Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
#align_import topology.metric_space.lipschitz from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Lipschitz continuous functions
A map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is called *Lipschitz continuous*
with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y` we have `edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`.
There is also a version asserting this inequality only for `x` and `y` in some set `s`.
Finally, `f : α → β` is called *locally Lipschitz continuous* if each `x : α` has a neighbourhood
on which `f` is Lipschitz continuous (with some constant).
In this file we provide various ways to prove that various combinations of Lipschitz continuous
functions are Lipschitz continuous. We also prove that Lipschitz continuous functions are
uniformly continuous, and that locally Lipschitz functions are continuous.
## Main definitions and lemmas
* `LipschitzWith K f`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0`
* `LipschitzOnWith K f s`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0` on a set `s`
* `LipschitzWith.uniformContinuous`: a Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous
* `LipschitzOnWith.uniformContinuousOn`: a function which is Lipschitz on a set `s` is uniformly
continuous on `s`.
* `LocallyLipschitz f`: states that `f` is locally Lipschitz
* `LocallyLipschitz.continuous`: a locally Lipschitz function is continuous.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjunction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. Constructors whose names end with `'` take `K : ℝ` as an
argument, and return `LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f`.
-/
universe u v w x
open Filter Function Set Topology NNReal ENNReal Bornology
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x}
/-- A function `f` is **Lipschitz continuous** with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y`
we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`. -/
def LipschitzWith [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) :=
∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
#align lipschitz_with LipschitzWith
/-- A function `f` is **Lipschitz continuous** with constant `K ≥ 0` **on `s`** if
for all `x, y` in `s` we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`. -/
def LipschitzOnWith [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β)
(s : Set α) :=
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
#align lipschitz_on_with LipschitzOnWith
/-- `f : α → β` is called **locally Lipschitz continuous** iff every point `x`
has a neighourhood on which `f` is Lipschitz. -/
def LocallyLipschitz [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ x : α, ∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f t
/-- Every function is Lipschitz on the empty set (with any Lipschitz constant). -/
@[simp]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_empty [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) :
LipschitzOnWith K f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
#align lipschitz_on_with_empty lipschitzOnWith_empty
/-- Being Lipschitz on a set is monotone w.r.t. that set. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.mono [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0} {s t : Set α}
{f : α → β} (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f t) (h : s ⊆ t) : LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
fun _x x_in _y y_in => hf (h x_in) (h y_in)
#align lipschitz_on_with.mono LipschitzOnWith.mono
/-- `f` is Lipschitz iff it is Lipschitz on the entire space. -/
@[simp]
theorem lipschitzOn_univ [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} :
LipschitzOnWith K f univ ↔ LipschitzWith K f := by simp [LipschitzOnWith, LipschitzWith]
#align lipschitz_on_univ lipschitzOn_univ
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} {s : Set α} : LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ LipschitzWith K (s.restrict f) := by
simp only [LipschitzOnWith, LipschitzWith, SetCoe.forall', restrict, Subtype.edist_eq]
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_restrict lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.to_restrict, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
#align lipschitz_on_with.to_restrict LipschitzOnWith.to_restrict
theorem MapsTo.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : MapsTo f s t) :
LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ LipschitzWith K (h.restrict f s t) :=
_root_.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
#align maps_to.lipschitz_on_with_iff_restrict MapsTo.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.to_restrict_mapsTo, _⟩ := MapsTo.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
#align lipschitz_on_with.to_restrict_maps_to LipschitzOnWith.to_restrict_mapsTo
namespace LipschitzWith
open EMetric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
protected theorem lipschitzOnWith (h : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) : LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
fun x _ y _ => h x y
#align lipschitz_with.lipschitz_on_with LipschitzWith.lipschitzOnWith
theorem edist_le_mul (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y :=
h x y
#align lipschitz_with.edist_le_mul LipschitzWith.edist_le_mul
theorem edist_le_mul_of_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hr : edist x y ≤ r) :
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(h x y).trans <| ENNReal.mul_left_mono hr
#align lipschitz_with.edist_le_mul_of_le LipschitzWith.edist_le_mul_of_le
theorem edist_lt_mul_of_lt (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (hr : edist x y < r) :
edist (f x) (f y) < K * r :=
(h x y).trans_lt <| (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_left (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hK) ENNReal.coe_ne_top).2 hr
#align lipschitz_with.edist_lt_mul_of_lt LipschitzWith.edist_lt_mul_of_lt
theorem mapsTo_emetric_closedBall (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (closedBall x r) (closedBall (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy => h.edist_le_mul_of_le hy
#align lipschitz_with.maps_to_emetric_closed_ball LipschitzWith.mapsTo_emetric_closedBall
theorem mapsTo_emetric_ball (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (ball x r) (ball (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy => h.edist_lt_mul_of_lt hK hy
#align lipschitz_with.maps_to_emetric_ball LipschitzWith.mapsTo_emetric_ball
theorem edist_lt_top (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {x y : α} (h : edist x y ≠ ⊤) :
edist (f x) (f y) < ⊤ :=
(hf x y).trans_lt <| ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top h
#align lipschitz_with.edist_lt_top LipschitzWith.edist_lt_top
theorem mul_edist_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) :
(K⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) * edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y := by
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul' (h x y)
#align lipschitz_with.mul_edist_le LipschitzWith.mul_edist_le
protected theorem of_edist_le (h : ∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
fun x y => by simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, h]
#align lipschitz_with.of_edist_le LipschitzWith.of_edist_le
protected theorem weaken (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {K' : ℝ≥0} (h : K ≤ K') : LipschitzWith K' f :=
fun x y => le_trans (hf x y) <| ENNReal.mul_right_mono (ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 h)
#align lipschitz_with.weaken LipschitzWith.weaken
theorem ediam_image_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) :
EMetric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * EMetric.diam s := by
apply EMetric.diam_le
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact hf.edist_le_mul_of_le (EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy)
#align lipschitz_with.ediam_image_le LipschitzWith.ediam_image_le
theorem edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {x y : α} {d : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : edist x y < d / K) : edist (f x) (f y) < d :=
calc
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y := hf x y
_ < d := ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div' h
#align lipschitz_with.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div LipschitzWith.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div
/-- A Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : UniformContinuous f :=
EMetric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε εpos =>
⟨ε / K, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ne_of_gt εpos, ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩, hf.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div⟩
#align lipschitz_with.uniform_continuous LipschitzWith.uniformContinuous
/-- A Lipschitz function is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : Continuous f :=
hf.uniformContinuous.continuous
#align lipschitz_with.continuous LipschitzWith.continuous
/-- Constant functions are Lipschitz (with any constant). -/
protected theorem const (b : β) : LipschitzWith 0 fun _ : α => b := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_self, zero_le]
#align lipschitz_with.const LipschitzWith.const
protected theorem const' (b : β) {K : ℝ≥0} : LipschitzWith K fun _ : α => b := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_self, zero_le]
/-- The identity is 1-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem id : LipschitzWith 1 (@id α) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
#align lipschitz_with.id LipschitzWith.id
/-- The inclusion of a subset is 1-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem subtype_val (s : Set α) : LipschitzWith 1 (Subtype.val : s → α) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
#align lipschitz_with.subtype_val LipschitzWith.subtype_val
#align lipschitz_with.subtype_coe LipschitzWith.subtype_val
theorem subtype_mk (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {p : β → Prop} (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
LipschitzWith K (fun x => ⟨f x, hp x⟩ : α → { y // p y }) :=
hf
#align lipschitz_with.subtype_mk LipschitzWith.subtype_mk
protected theorem eval {α : ι → Type u} [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)] [Fintype ι] (i : ι) :
LipschitzWith 1 (Function.eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun f g => by convert edist_le_pi_edist f g i
#align lipschitz_with.eval LipschitzWith.eval
/-- The restriction of a `K`-Lipschitz function is `K`-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem restrict (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) : LipschitzWith K (s.restrict f) :=
fun x y => hf x y
#align lipschitz_with.restrict LipschitzWith.restrict
/-- The composition of Lipschitz functions is Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem comp {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f)
(hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) : LipschitzWith (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) := fun x y =>
calc
edist (f (g x)) (f (g y)) ≤ Kf * edist (g x) (g y) := hf _ _
_ ≤ Kf * (Kg * edist x y) := ENNReal.mul_left_mono (hg _ _)
_ = (Kf * Kg : ℝ≥0) * edist x y := by rw [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.coe_mul]
#align lipschitz_with.comp LipschitzWith.comp
theorem comp_lipschitzOnWith {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g s) : LipschitzOnWith (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) s :=
lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict.mpr <| hf.comp hg.to_restrict
#align lipschitz_with.comp_lipschitz_on_with LipschitzWith.comp_lipschitzOnWith
protected theorem prod_fst : LipschitzWith 1 (@Prod.fst α β) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_max_left _ _
#align lipschitz_with.prod_fst LipschitzWith.prod_fst
protected theorem prod_snd : LipschitzWith 1 (@Prod.snd α β) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_max_right _ _
#align lipschitz_with.prod_snd LipschitzWith.prod_snd
/-- If `f` and `g` are Lipschitz functions, so is the induced map `f × g` to the product type. -/
protected theorem prod {f : α → β} {Kf : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) {g : α → γ} {Kg : ℝ≥0}
(hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) : LipschitzWith (max Kf Kg) fun x => (f x, g x) := by
intro x y
rw [ENNReal.coe_mono.map_max, Prod.edist_eq, ENNReal.max_mul]
exact max_le_max (hf x y) (hg x y)
#align lipschitz_with.prod LipschitzWith.prod
protected theorem prod_mk_left (a : α) : LipschitzWith 1 (Prod.mk a : β → α × β) := by
simpa only [max_eq_right zero_le_one] using (LipschitzWith.const a).prod LipschitzWith.id
#align lipschitz_with.prod_mk_left LipschitzWith.prod_mk_left
protected theorem prod_mk_right (b : β) : LipschitzWith 1 fun a : α => (a, b) := by
simpa only [max_eq_left zero_le_one] using LipschitzWith.id.prod (LipschitzWith.const b)
#align lipschitz_with.prod_mk_right LipschitzWith.prod_mk_right
protected theorem uncurry {f : α → β → γ} {Kα Kβ : ℝ≥0} (hα : ∀ b, LipschitzWith Kα fun a => f a b)
(hβ : ∀ a, LipschitzWith Kβ (f a)) : LipschitzWith (Kα + Kβ) (Function.uncurry f) := by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
simp only [Function.uncurry, ENNReal.coe_add, add_mul]
apply le_trans (edist_triangle _ (f a₂ b₁) _)
exact
add_le_add (le_trans (hα _ _ _) <| ENNReal.mul_left_mono <| le_max_left _ _)
(le_trans (hβ _ _ _) <| ENNReal.mul_left_mono <| le_max_right _ _)
#align lipschitz_with.uncurry LipschitzWith.uncurry
/-- Iterates of a Lipschitz function are Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem iterate {f : α → α} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : ∀ n, LipschitzWith (K ^ n) f^[n]
| 0 => by simpa only [pow_zero] using LipschitzWith.id
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ]; exact (LipschitzWith.iterate hf n).comp hf
#align lipschitz_with.iterate LipschitzWith.iterate
theorem edist_iterate_succ_le_geometric {f : α → α} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (x n) :
edist (f^[n] x) (f^[n + 1] x) ≤ edist x (f x) * (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n := by
rw [iterate_succ, mul_comm]
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_pow] using (hf.iterate n) x (f x)
#align lipschitz_with.edist_iterate_succ_le_geometric LipschitzWith.edist_iterate_succ_le_geometric
protected theorem mul_end {f g : Function.End α} {Kf Kg} (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f)
(hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) : LipschitzWith (Kf * Kg) (f * g : Function.End α) :=
hf.comp hg
#align lipschitz_with.mul LipschitzWith.mul_end
/-- The product of a list of Lipschitz continuous endomorphisms is a Lipschitz continuous
endomorphism. -/
protected theorem list_prod (f : ι → Function.End α) (K : ι → ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ i, LipschitzWith (K i) (f i)) : ∀ l : List ι, LipschitzWith (l.map K).prod (l.map f).prod
| [] => by simpa using LipschitzWith.id
| i::l => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons]
exact (h i).mul_end (LipschitzWith.list_prod f K h l)
#align lipschitz_with.list_prod LipschitzWith.list_prod
protected theorem pow_end {f : Function.End α} {K} (h : LipschitzWith K f) :
∀ n : ℕ, LipschitzWith (K ^ n) (f ^ n : Function.End α)
| 0 => by simpa only [pow_zero] using LipschitzWith.id
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (LipschitzWith.pow_end h n).mul_end h
#align lipschitz_with.pow LipschitzWith.pow_end
end LipschitzWith
namespace LipschitzOnWith
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
protected theorem uniformContinuousOn (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) : UniformContinuousOn f s :=
uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict.mpr (lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict.mp hf).uniformContinuous
#align lipschitz_on_with.uniform_continuous_on LipschitzOnWith.uniformContinuousOn
protected theorem continuousOn (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
hf.uniformContinuousOn.continuousOn
#align lipschitz_on_with.continuous_on LipschitzOnWith.continuousOn
theorem edist_le_mul_of_le (h : LipschitzOnWith K f s) {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : edist x y ≤ r) :
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(h hx hy).trans <| ENNReal.mul_left_mono hr
theorem edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{d : ℝ≥0∞} (hd : edist x y < d / K) : edist (f x) (f y) < d :=
hf.to_restrict.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div <|
show edist (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) ⟨y, hy⟩ < d / K from hd
#align lipschitz_on_with.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div LipschitzOnWith.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div
protected theorem comp {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {Kg : ℝ≥0} (hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g t)
(hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) (hmaps : MapsTo f s t) : LipschitzOnWith (Kg * K) (g ∘ f) s :=
lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict.mpr <| hg.to_restrict.comp (hf.to_restrict_mapsTo hmaps)
#align lipschitz_on_with.comp LipschitzOnWith.comp
/-- If `f` and `g` are Lipschitz on `s`, so is the induced map `f × g` to the product type. -/
protected theorem prod {g : α → γ} {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzOnWith Kf f s)
(hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g s) : LipschitzOnWith (max Kf Kg) (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := by
intro _ hx _ hy
rw [ENNReal.coe_mono.map_max, Prod.edist_eq, ENNReal.max_mul]
exact max_le_max (hf hx hy) (hg hx hy)
theorem ediam_image2_le (f : α → β → γ) {K₁ K₂ : ℝ≥0} (s : Set α) (t : Set β)
(hf₁ : ∀ b ∈ t, LipschitzOnWith K₁ (f · b) s) (hf₂ : ∀ a ∈ s, LipschitzOnWith K₂ (f a) t) :
EMetric.diam (Set.image2 f s t) ≤ ↑K₁ * EMetric.diam s + ↑K₂ * EMetric.diam t := by
simp only [EMetric.diam_le_iff, forall_image2_iff]
intro a₁ ha₁ b₁ hb₁ a₂ ha₂ b₂ hb₂
refine (edist_triangle _ (f a₂ b₁) _).trans ?_
exact
add_le_add
((hf₁ b₁ hb₁ ha₁ ha₂).trans <| ENNReal.mul_left_mono <| EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem ha₁ ha₂)
((hf₂ a₂ ha₂ hb₁ hb₂).trans <| ENNReal.mul_left_mono <| EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hb₁ hb₂)
#align lipschitz_on_with.ediam_image2_le LipschitzOnWith.ediam_image2_le
end LipschitzOnWith
namespace LocallyLipschitz
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ] {f : α → β}
/-- A Lipschitz function is locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma _root_.LipschitzWith.locallyLipschitz {K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) :
LocallyLipschitz f :=
fun _ ↦ ⟨K, univ, Filter.univ_mem, lipschitzOn_univ.mpr hf⟩
/-- The identity function is locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma id : LocallyLipschitz (@id α) := LipschitzWith.id.locallyLipschitz
/-- Constant functions are locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma const (b : β) : LocallyLipschitz (fun _ : α ↦ b) :=
(LipschitzWith.const b).locallyLipschitz
/-- A locally Lipschitz function is continuous. (The converse is false: for example,
$x ↦ \sqrt{x}$ is continuous, but not locally Lipschitz at 0.) -/
protected theorem continuous {f : α → β} (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) : Continuous f := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
rcases (hf x) with ⟨K, t, ht, hK⟩
exact (hK.continuousOn).continuousAt ht
/-- The composition of locally Lipschitz functions is locally Lipschitz. --/
protected lemma comp {f : β → γ} {g : α → β}
(hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (hg : LocallyLipschitz g) : LocallyLipschitz (f ∘ g) := by
intro x
-- g is Lipschitz on t ∋ x, f is Lipschitz on u ∋ g(x)
rcases hg x with ⟨Kg, t, ht, hgL⟩
rcases hf (g x) with ⟨Kf, u, hu, hfL⟩
refine ⟨Kf * Kg, t ∩ g⁻¹' u, inter_mem ht (hg.continuous.continuousAt hu), ?_⟩
exact hfL.comp (hgL.mono inter_subset_left)
((mapsTo_preimage g u).mono_left inter_subset_right)
/-- If `f` and `g` are locally Lipschitz, so is the induced map `f × g` to the product type. -/
protected lemma prod {f : α → β} (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) {g : α → γ} (hg : LocallyLipschitz g) :
LocallyLipschitz fun x => (f x, g x) := by
intro x
rcases hf x with ⟨Kf, t₁, h₁t, hfL⟩
rcases hg x with ⟨Kg, t₂, h₂t, hgL⟩
refine ⟨max Kf Kg, t₁ ∩ t₂, Filter.inter_mem h₁t h₂t, ?_⟩
exact (hfL.mono inter_subset_left).prod (hgL.mono inter_subset_right)
protected theorem prod_mk_left (a : α) : LocallyLipschitz (Prod.mk a : β → α × β) :=
(LipschitzWith.prod_mk_left a).locallyLipschitz
protected theorem prod_mk_right (b : β) : LocallyLipschitz (fun a : α => (a, b)) :=
(LipschitzWith.prod_mk_right b).locallyLipschitz
protected theorem iterate {f : α → α} (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) : ∀ n, LocallyLipschitz f^[n]
| 0 => by simpa only [pow_zero] using LocallyLipschitz.id
| n + 1 => by rw [iterate_add, iterate_one]; exact (hf.iterate n).comp hf
protected theorem mul_end {f g : Function.End α} (hf : LocallyLipschitz f)
(hg : LocallyLipschitz g) : LocallyLipschitz (f * g : Function.End α) := hf.comp hg
protected theorem pow_end {f : Function.End α} (h : LocallyLipschitz f) :
∀ n : ℕ, LocallyLipschitz (f ^ n : Function.End α)
| 0 => by simpa only [pow_zero] using LocallyLipschitz.id
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact (h.pow_end n).mul_end h
end LocallyLipschitz
/-- Consider a function `f : α × β → γ`. Suppose that it is continuous on each “vertical fiber”
`{a} × t`, `a ∈ s`, and is Lipschitz continuous on each “horizontal fiber” `s × {b}`, `b ∈ t`
with the same Lipschitz constant `K`. Then it is continuous on `s × t`. Moreover, it suffices
to require continuity on vertical fibers for `a` from a subset `s' ⊆ s` that is dense in `s`.
The actual statement uses (Lipschitz) continuity of `fun y ↦ f (a, y)` and `fun x ↦ f (x, b)`
instead of continuity of `f` on subsets of the product space. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Lipschitz.lean | 421 | 449 | theorem continuousOn_prod_of_subset_closure_continuousOn_lipschitzOnWith [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ] (f : α × β → γ) {s s' : Set α} {t : Set β}
(hs' : s' ⊆ s) (hss' : s ⊆ closure s') (K : ℝ≥0)
(ha : ∀ a ∈ s', ContinuousOn (fun y => f (a, y)) t)
(hb : ∀ b ∈ t, LipschitzOnWith K (fun x => f (x, b)) s) : ContinuousOn f (s ×ˢ t) := by |
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx : x ∈ s, hy : y ∈ t⟩
refine EMetric.nhds_basis_closed_eball.tendsto_right_iff.2 fun ε (ε0 : 0 < ε) => ?_
replace ε0 : 0 < ε / 2 := ENNReal.half_pos ε0.ne'
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ : ℝ≥0, 0 < δ ∧ (δ : ℝ≥0∞) * ↑(3 * K) < ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt ENNReal.coe_ne_top ε0.ne'
rw [← ENNReal.coe_pos] at δpos
rcases EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 (hss' hx) δ δpos with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
have A : s ∩ EMetric.ball x δ ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (EMetric.ball_mem_nhds _ δpos)
have B : t ∩ { b | edist (f (x', b)) (f (x', y)) ≤ ε / 2 } ∈ 𝓝[t] y :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (ha x' hx' y hy (EMetric.closedBall_mem_nhds (f (x', y)) ε0))
filter_upwards [nhdsWithin_prod A B] with ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨⟨has, hax⟩, ⟨hbt, hby⟩⟩
calc
edist (f (a, b)) (f (x, y)) ≤ edist (f (a, b)) (f (x', b)) + edist (f (x', b)) (f (x', y)) +
edist (f (x', y)) (f (x, y)) := edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
_ ≤ K * (δ + δ) + ε / 2 + K * δ := by
gcongr
· refine (hb b hbt).edist_le_mul_of_le has (hs' hx') ?_
exact (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans (add_le_add (le_of_lt hax) hxx'.le)
· exact hby
· exact (hb y hy).edist_le_mul_of_le (hs' hx') hx ((edist_comm _ _).trans_le hxx'.le)
_ = δ * ↑(3 * K) + ε / 2 := by push_cast; ring
_ ≤ ε / 2 + ε / 2 := by gcongr
_ = ε := ENNReal.add_halves _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Justus Springer
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.LocalizationLocalization
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.SheafCondition.Sites
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Functors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LocalizedModule
#align_import algebraic_geometry.Spec from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# $Spec$ as a functor to locally ringed spaces.
We define the functor $Spec$ from commutative rings to locally ringed spaces.
## Implementation notes
We define $Spec$ in three consecutive steps, each with more structure than the last:
1. `Spec.toTop`, valued in the category of topological spaces,
2. `Spec.toSheafedSpace`, valued in the category of sheafed spaces and
3. `Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace`, valued in the category of locally ringed spaces.
Additionally, we provide `Spec.toPresheafedSpace` as a composition of `Spec.toSheafedSpace` with
a forgetful functor.
## Related results
The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` is constructed in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/GammaSpecAdjunction.lean`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve perfomance #12737
noncomputable section
universe u v
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory
open StructureSheaf
open Spec (structureSheaf)
/-- The spectrum of a commutative ring, as a topological space.
-/
def Spec.topObj (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : TopCat :=
TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.Top_obj AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.topObj
@[simp] theorem Spec.topObj_forget {R} : (forget TopCat).obj (Spec.topObj R) = PrimeSpectrum R :=
rfl
/-- The induced map of a ring homomorphism on the ring spectra, as a morphism of topological spaces.
-/
def Spec.topMap {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) : Spec.topObj S ⟶ Spec.topObj R :=
PrimeSpectrum.comap f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.Top_map AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.topMap
@[simp]
theorem Spec.topMap_id (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : Spec.topMap (𝟙 R) = 𝟙 (Spec.topObj R) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.Top_map_id AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.topMap_id
@[simp]
theorem Spec.topMap_comp {R S T : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (g : S ⟶ T) :
Spec.topMap (f ≫ g) = Spec.topMap g ≫ Spec.topMap f :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.Top_map_comp AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.topMap_comp
-- Porting note: `simps!` generate some garbage lemmas, so choose manually,
-- if more is needed, add them here
/-- The spectrum, as a contravariant functor from commutative rings to topological spaces.
-/
@[simps! obj map]
def Spec.toTop : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ ⥤ TopCat where
obj R := Spec.topObj (unop R)
map {R S} f := Spec.topMap f.unop
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.to_Top AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.toTop
/-- The spectrum of a commutative ring, as a `SheafedSpace`.
-/
@[simps]
def Spec.sheafedSpaceObj (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : SheafedSpace CommRingCat where
carrier := Spec.topObj R
presheaf := (structureSheaf R).1
IsSheaf := (structureSheaf R).2
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.SheafedSpace_obj AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.sheafedSpaceObj
/-- The induced map of a ring homomorphism on the ring spectra, as a morphism of sheafed spaces.
-/
@[simps]
def Spec.sheafedSpaceMap {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) :
Spec.sheafedSpaceObj S ⟶ Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R where
base := Spec.topMap f
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
comap f (unop U) ((TopologicalSpace.Opens.map (Spec.topMap f)).obj (unop U)) fun _ => id
naturality := fun {_ _} _ => RingHom.ext fun _ => Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => rfl }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.SheafedSpace_map AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.sheafedSpaceMap
@[simp]
theorem Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_id {R : CommRingCat.{u}} :
Spec.sheafedSpaceMap (𝟙 R) = 𝟙 (Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R) :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ (Spec.topMap_id R) <| by
ext
dsimp
erw [comap_id (by simp)]
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.SheafedSpace_map_id AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_id
theorem Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_comp {R S T : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (g : S ⟶ T) :
Spec.sheafedSpaceMap (f ≫ g) = Spec.sheafedSpaceMap g ≫ Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ (Spec.topMap_comp f g) <| by
ext
-- Porting note: was one liner
-- `dsimp, rw category_theory.functor.map_id, rw category.comp_id, erw comap_comp f g, refl`
rw [NatTrans.comp_app, sheafedSpaceMap_c_app, whiskerRight_app, eqToHom_refl]
erw [(sheafedSpaceObj T).presheaf.map_id, Category.comp_id, comap_comp]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.SheafedSpace_map_comp AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_comp
/-- Spec, as a contravariant functor from commutative rings to sheafed spaces.
-/
@[simps]
def Spec.toSheafedSpace : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ ⥤ SheafedSpace CommRingCat where
obj R := Spec.sheafedSpaceObj (unop R)
map f := Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f.unop
map_comp f g := by simp [Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_comp]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.to_SheafedSpace AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.toSheafedSpace
/-- Spec, as a contravariant functor from commutative rings to presheafed spaces.
-/
def Spec.toPresheafedSpace : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ ⥤ PresheafedSpace CommRingCat :=
Spec.toSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.to_PresheafedSpace AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.toPresheafedSpace
@[simp]
theorem Spec.toPresheafedSpace_obj (R : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ) :
Spec.toPresheafedSpace.obj R = (Spec.sheafedSpaceObj (unop R)).toPresheafedSpace :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.to_PresheafedSpace_obj AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.toPresheafedSpace_obj
theorem Spec.toPresheafedSpace_obj_op (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
Spec.toPresheafedSpace.obj (op R) = (Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R).toPresheafedSpace :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.to_PresheafedSpace_obj_op AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.toPresheafedSpace_obj_op
@[simp]
theorem Spec.toPresheafedSpace_map (R S : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ) (f : R ⟶ S) :
Spec.toPresheafedSpace.map f = Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f.unop :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.to_PresheafedSpace_map AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.toPresheafedSpace_map
theorem Spec.toPresheafedSpace_map_op (R S : CommRingCat.{u}) (f : R ⟶ S) :
Spec.toPresheafedSpace.map f.op = Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.to_PresheafedSpace_map_op AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.toPresheafedSpace_map_op
theorem Spec.basicOpen_hom_ext {X : RingedSpace.{u}} {R : CommRingCat.{u}}
{α β : X ⟶ Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R} (w : α.base = β.base)
(h : ∀ r : R,
let U := PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen r
(toOpen R U ≫ α.c.app (op U)) ≫ X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by rw [w])) =
toOpen R U ≫ β.c.app (op U)) :
α = β := by
ext : 1
· exact w
· apply
((TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ β.base).obj X.sheaf).hom_ext _ PrimeSpectrum.isBasis_basic_opens
intro r
apply (StructureSheaf.to_basicOpen_epi R r).1
simpa using h r
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.basic_open_hom_ext AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.basicOpen_hom_ext
-- Porting note: `simps!` generate some garbage lemmas, so choose manually,
-- if more is needed, add them here
/-- The spectrum of a commutative ring, as a `LocallyRingedSpace`.
-/
@[simps! toSheafedSpace presheaf]
def Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : LocallyRingedSpace :=
{ Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R with
localRing := fun x =>
RingEquiv.localRing (A := Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal)
(Iso.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv <| stalkIso R x).symm }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.LocallyRingedSpace_obj AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_sheaf (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R).sheaf = structureSheaf R := rfl
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_sheaf' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj <| CommRingCat.of R).sheaf = structureSheaf R := rfl
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_presheaf_map (R : CommRingCat.{u}) {U V} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R).presheaf.map i =
(structureSheaf R).1.map i := rfl
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_presheaf' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj <| CommRingCat.of R).presheaf = (structureSheaf R).1 := rfl
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_presheaf_map' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] {U V} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj <| CommRingCat.of R).presheaf.map i =
(structureSheaf R).1.map i := rfl
@[elementwise]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Spec.lean | 232 | 238 | theorem stalkMap_toStalk {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (p : PrimeSpectrum S) :
toStalk R (PrimeSpectrum.comap f p) ≫ PresheafedSpace.stalkMap (Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f) p =
f ≫ toStalk S p := by |
erw [← toOpen_germ S ⊤ ⟨p, trivial⟩, ← toOpen_germ R ⊤ ⟨PrimeSpectrum.comap f p, trivial⟩,
Category.assoc, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap_germ (Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f) ⊤ ⟨p, trivial⟩,
Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_c_app, toOpen_comp_comap_assoc]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.QuasiCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.QuasiSeparated
#align_import algebraic_geometry.morphisms.quasi_separated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1a51edf13debfcbe223fa06b1cb353b9ed9751cc"
/-!
# Quasi-separated morphisms
A morphism of schemes `f : X ⟶ Y` is quasi-separated if the diagonal morphism `X ⟶ X ×[Y] X` is
quasi-compact.
A scheme is quasi-separated if the intersections of any two affine open sets is quasi-compact.
(`AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine`)
We show that a morphism is quasi-separated if the preimage of every affine open is quasi-separated.
We also show that this property is local at the target,
and is stable under compositions and base-changes.
## Main result
- `AlgebraicGeometry.is_localization_basicOpen_of_qcqs` (**Qcqs lemma**):
If `U` is qcqs, then `Γ(X, D(f)) ≃ Γ(X, U)_f` for every `f : Γ(X, U)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
/-- A morphism is `QuasiSeparated` if diagonal map is quasi-compact. -/
@[mk_iff]
class QuasiSeparated (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- A morphism is `QuasiSeparated` if diagonal map is quasi-compact. -/
diagonalQuasiCompact : QuasiCompact (pullback.diagonal f) := by infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated
/-- The `AffineTargetMorphismProperty` corresponding to `QuasiSeparated`, asserting that the
domain is a quasi-separated scheme. -/
def QuasiSeparated.affineProperty : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun X _ _ _ =>
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affineProperty
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier ↔ ∀ U V : X.affineOpens, IsCompact (U ∩ V : Set X.carrier) := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff]
constructor
· intro H U V; exact H U V U.1.2 U.2.isCompact V.1.2 V.2.isCompact
· intro H
suffices
∀ (U : Opens X.carrier) (_ : IsCompact U.1) (V : Opens X.carrier) (_ : IsCompact V.1),
IsCompact (U ⊓ V).1
by intro U V hU hU' hV hV'; exact this ⟨U, hU⟩ hU' ⟨V, hV⟩ hV'
intro U hU V hV
-- Porting note: it complains "unable to find motive", but telling Lean that motive is
-- underscore is actually sufficient, weird
apply compact_open_induction_on (P := _) V hV
· simp
· intro S _ V hV
change IsCompact (U.1 ∩ (S.1 ∪ V.1))
rw [Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
apply hV.union
clear hV
apply compact_open_induction_on (P := _) U hU
· simp
· intro S _ W hW
change IsCompact ((S.1 ∪ W.1) ∩ V.1)
rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
apply hW.union
apply H
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_iff_affine AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine
theorem quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal f ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine]
constructor
· intro H U V
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
haveI : IsAffine _ := V.2
let g : pullback (X.ofRestrict U.1.openEmbedding) (X.ofRestrict V.1.openEmbedding) ⟶ X :=
pullback.fst ≫ X.ofRestrict _
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` does not work here
have : IsOpenImmersion g := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ this.base_open.toEmbedding
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
erw [Subtype.range_coe, Subtype.range_coe] at e
rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace]
exact @Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _ (H _ _) e
· introv H h₁ h₂
let g : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ X := pullback.fst ≫ f₁
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` does not work here
have : IsOpenImmersion g := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ this.base_open.toEmbedding
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
simp_rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace] at H
exact
@Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _
(H ⟨⟨_, h₁.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩
⟨⟨_, h₂.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩)
e.symm
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_affine_property_iff_quasi_separated_space AlgebraicGeometry.quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact :
@QuasiSeparated = MorphismProperty.diagonal @QuasiCompact := by ext; exact quasiSeparated_iff _
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_diagonal_is_quasi_compact AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact
theorem quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq :
QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal = QuasiSeparated.affineProperty := by
funext; rw [quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace]; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_affine_property_diagonal_eq AlgebraicGeometry.quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal :
@QuasiSeparated = targetAffineLocally QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact, quasiCompact_eq_affineProperty]
exact
diagonal_targetAffineLocally_eq_targetAffineLocally _ QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_affine_property_diagonal AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty :
@QuasiSeparated = targetAffineLocally QuasiSeparated.affineProperty := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal, quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq]
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty
theorem QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal : QuasiSeparated.affineProperty.IsLocal :=
quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq ▸ QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_property_is_local AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal
instance (priority := 900) quasiSeparatedOfMono {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
QuasiSeparated f where
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_of_mono AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedOfMono
instance quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition :
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸
(MorphismProperty.diagonal_isStableUnderComposition
quasiCompact_respectsIso quasiCompact_stableUnderBaseChange)
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_stable_under_composition AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition
theorem quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange :
MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸
quasiCompact_stableUnderBaseChange.diagonal quasiCompact_respectsIso
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_stable_under_base_change AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange
instance quasiSeparatedComp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated f]
[QuasiSeparated g] : QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.comp_mem _ f g inferInstance inferInstance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_comp AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedComp
theorem quasiSeparated_respectsIso : MorphismProperty.RespectsIso @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸ quasiCompact_respectsIso.diagonal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_respects_iso AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_respectsIso
open List in
theorem QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[QuasiSeparated f,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier,
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (i : 𝒰.J),
QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier,
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f g).carrier,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)) (𝒰' :
∀ i : 𝒰.J, Scheme.OpenCover.{u} (pullback f (𝒰.map i))) (_ :
∀ i j, IsAffine ((𝒰' i).obj j)),
∀ (i : 𝒰.J) (j k : (𝒰' i).J),
CompactSpace (pullback ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k)).carrier] := by
have := QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal_affine_openCover_TFAE f
simp_rw [← quasiCompact_eq_affineProperty, ← quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact,
quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq] at this
exact this
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE
theorem QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target : PropertyIsLocalAtTarget @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal.symm ▸
QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal.targetAffineLocallyIsLocal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.is_local_at_target AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target
open List in
theorem QuasiSeparated.openCover_TFAE {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[QuasiSeparated f,
∃ 𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y,
∀ i : 𝒰.J, QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (i : 𝒰.J),
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ U : Opens Y.carrier, QuasiSeparated (f ∣_ U),
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion g],
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _),
∃ (ι : Type u) (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier) (_ : iSup U = ⊤),
∀ i, QuasiSeparated (f ∣_ U i)] :=
QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target.openCover_TFAE f
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.openCover_TFAE
theorem quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y] :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty,
QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal.affine_target_iff f, QuasiSeparated.affineProperty]
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_over_affine_iff AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier ↔ QuasiSeparated (terminal.from X) :=
(quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff _).symm
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_iff_quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated
theorem QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_iff {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y)
[∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ ∀ i, QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty,
QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal.affine_openCover_iff f 𝒰]
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_iff
theorem QuasiSeparated.openCover_iff {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ ∀ i, QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _) :=
QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target.openCover_iff f 𝒰
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.openCover_iff
instance {X Y S : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [QuasiSeparated g] :
QuasiSeparated (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) :=
quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange.fst f g inferInstance
instance {X Y S : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [QuasiSeparated f] :
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) :=
quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange.snd f g inferInstance
instance {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated f] [QuasiSeparated g] :
QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.comp_mem _ f g inferInstance inferInstance
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[hY : QuasiSeparatedSpace Y.carrier] [QuasiSeparated f] : QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated] at hY ⊢
have : f ≫ terminal.from Y = terminal.from X := terminalIsTerminal.hom_ext _ _
rw [← this]
infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_of_quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated
instance quasiSeparatedSpace_of_isAffine (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
constructor
intro U V hU hU' hV hV'
obtain ⟨s, hs, e⟩ := (isCompact_open_iff_eq_basicOpen_union _).mp ⟨hU', hU⟩
obtain ⟨s', hs', e'⟩ := (isCompact_open_iff_eq_basicOpen_union _).mp ⟨hV', hV⟩
rw [e, e', Set.iUnion₂_inter]
simp_rw [Set.inter_iUnion₂]
apply hs.isCompact_biUnion
intro i _
apply hs'.isCompact_biUnion
intro i' _
change IsCompact (X.basicOpen i ⊓ X.basicOpen i').1
rw [← Scheme.basicOpen_mul]
exact ((topIsAffineOpen _).basicOpenIsAffine _).isCompact
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_of_is_affine AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_of_isAffine
theorem IsAffineOpen.isQuasiSeparated {X : Scheme} {U : Opens X.carrier} (hU : IsAffineOpen U) :
IsQuasiSeparated (U : Set X.carrier) := by
rw [isQuasiSeparated_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace]
exacts [@AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_of_isAffine _ hU, U.isOpen]
#align algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open.is_quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen.isQuasiSeparated
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/QuasiSeparated.lean | 277 | 297 | theorem quasiSeparatedOfComp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [H : QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g)] :
QuasiSeparated f := by |
-- Porting note: rewrite `(QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1` directly fails, but
-- give it a name works
have h01 := (QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1
rw [h01]; clear h01
-- Porting note: rewrite `(QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE ...).out 0 2` directly fails, but
-- give it a name works
have h02 := (QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE (f ≫ g)).out 0 2
rw [h02] at H; clear h02
refine ⟨(Z.affineCover.pullbackCover g).bind fun x => Scheme.affineCover _, ?_, ?_⟩
-- constructor
· intro i; dsimp; infer_instance
rintro ⟨i, j⟩; dsimp at i j
-- replace H := H (Scheme.OpenCover.pullbackCover (Scheme.affineCover Z) g) i
specialize H _ i
-- rw [← isQuasiSeparated_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace] at H
refine @quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated _ _ ?_ H ?_
· exact pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) _ _ (by simp) (Category.comp_id _) ≫
(pullbackRightPullbackFstIso g (Z.affineCover.map i) f).hom
· exact inferInstance
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Complex
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.AsPolynomial
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.cyclotomic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7fdeecc0d03cd40f7a165e6cf00a4d2286db599f"
/-!
# Cyclotomic polynomials.
For `n : ℕ` and an integral domain `R`, we define a modified version of the `n`-th cyclotomic
polynomial with coefficients in `R`, denoted `cyclotomic' n R`, as `∏ (X - μ)`, where `μ` varies
over the primitive `n`th roots of unity. If there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R` then
this the standard definition. We then define the standard cyclotomic polynomial `cyclotomic n R`
with coefficients in any ring `R`.
## Main definition
* `cyclotomic n R` : the `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`.
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_cyclotomic` : The degree of `cyclotomic n` is `totient n`.
* `Polynomial.prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one` : `X ^ n - 1 = ∏ (cyclotomic i)`, where `i`
divides `n`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_eq_prod_X_pow_sub_one_pow_moebius` : The Möbius inversion formula for
`cyclotomic n R` over an abstract fraction field for `R[X]`.
## Implementation details
Our definition of `cyclotomic' n R` makes sense in any integral domain `R`, but the interesting
results hold if there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `R`. In particular, our definition is
not the standard one unless there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R`. For example,
`cyclotomic' 3 ℤ = 1`, since there are no primitive cube roots of unity in `ℤ`. The main example is
`R = ℂ`, we decided to work in general since the difficulties are essentially the same.
To get the standard cyclotomic polynomials, we use `unique_int_coeff_of_cycl`, with `R = ℂ`,
to get a polynomial with integer coefficients and then we map it to `R[X]`, for any ring `R`.
-/
open scoped Polynomial
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace Polynomial
section Cyclotomic'
section IsDomain
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
/-- The modified `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`, it is the usual cyclotomic
polynomial if there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `R`. -/
def cyclotomic' (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : R[X] :=
∏ μ ∈ primitiveRoots n R, (X - C μ)
#align polynomial.cyclotomic' Polynomial.cyclotomic'
/-- The zeroth modified cyclotomic polyomial is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_zero (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' 0 R = 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic', Finset.prod_empty, primitiveRoots_zero]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_zero Polynomial.cyclotomic'_zero
/-- The first modified cyclotomic polyomial is `X - 1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_one (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' 1 R = X - 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic', Finset.prod_singleton, RingHom.map_one,
IsPrimitiveRoot.primitiveRoots_one]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_one Polynomial.cyclotomic'_one
/-- The second modified cyclotomic polyomial is `X + 1` if the characteristic of `R` is not `2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_two (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (p : ℕ) [CharP R p] (hp : p ≠ 2) :
cyclotomic' 2 R = X + 1 := by
rw [cyclotomic']
have prim_root_two : primitiveRoots 2 R = {(-1 : R)} := by
simp only [Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, mem_primitiveRoots two_pos]
exact ⟨IsPrimitiveRoot.neg_one p hp, fun x => IsPrimitiveRoot.eq_neg_one_of_two_right⟩
simp only [prim_root_two, Finset.prod_singleton, RingHom.map_neg, RingHom.map_one, sub_neg_eq_add]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_two Polynomial.cyclotomic'_two
/-- `cyclotomic' n R` is monic. -/
theorem cyclotomic'.monic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
(cyclotomic' n R).Monic :=
monic_prod_of_monic _ _ fun _ _ => monic_X_sub_C _
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'.monic Polynomial.cyclotomic'.monic
/-- `cyclotomic' n R` is different from `0`. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' n R ≠ 0 :=
(cyclotomic'.monic n R).ne_zero
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_ne_zero Polynomial.cyclotomic'_ne_zero
/-- The natural degree of `cyclotomic' n R` is `totient n` if there is a primitive root of
unity in `R`. -/
theorem natDegree_cyclotomic' {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
(cyclotomic' n R).natDegree = Nat.totient n := by
rw [cyclotomic']
rw [natDegree_prod (primitiveRoots n R) fun z : R => X - C z]
· simp only [IsPrimitiveRoot.card_primitiveRoots h, mul_one, natDegree_X_sub_C, Nat.cast_id,
Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
intro z _
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero z
#align polynomial.nat_degree_cyclotomic' Polynomial.natDegree_cyclotomic'
/-- The degree of `cyclotomic' n R` is `totient n` if there is a primitive root of unity in `R`. -/
theorem degree_cyclotomic' {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
(cyclotomic' n R).degree = Nat.totient n := by
simp only [degree_eq_natDegree (cyclotomic'_ne_zero n R), natDegree_cyclotomic' h]
#align polynomial.degree_cyclotomic' Polynomial.degree_cyclotomic'
/-- The roots of `cyclotomic' n R` are the primitive `n`-th roots of unity. -/
theorem roots_of_cyclotomic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
(cyclotomic' n R).roots = (primitiveRoots n R).val := by
rw [cyclotomic']; exact roots_prod_X_sub_C (primitiveRoots n R)
#align polynomial.roots_of_cyclotomic Polynomial.roots_of_cyclotomic
/-- If there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `K`, then `X ^ n - 1 = ∏ (X - μ)`, where `μ`
varies over the `n`-th roots of unity. -/
theorem X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
X ^ n - 1 = ∏ ζ ∈ nthRootsFinset n R, (X - C ζ) := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset, ← Multiset.toFinset_eq (IsPrimitiveRoot.nthRoots_one_nodup h)]
simp only [Finset.prod_mk, RingHom.map_one]
rw [nthRoots]
have hmonic : (X ^ n - C (1 : R)).Monic := monic_X_pow_sub_C (1 : R) (ne_of_lt hpos).symm
symm
apply prod_multiset_X_sub_C_of_monic_of_roots_card_eq hmonic
rw [@natDegree_X_pow_sub_C R _ _ n 1, ← nthRoots]
exact IsPrimitiveRoot.card_nthRoots_one h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod Polynomial.X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod
end IsDomain
section Field
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- `cyclotomic' n K` splits. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_splits (n : ℕ) : Splits (RingHom.id K) (cyclotomic' n K) := by
apply splits_prod (RingHom.id K)
intro z _
simp only [splits_X_sub_C (RingHom.id K)]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_splits Polynomial.cyclotomic'_splits
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then `X ^ n - 1` splits. -/
theorem X_pow_sub_one_splits {ζ : K} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
Splits (RingHom.id K) (X ^ n - C (1 : K)) := by
rw [splits_iff_card_roots, ← nthRoots, IsPrimitiveRoot.card_nthRoots_one h, natDegree_X_pow_sub_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.X_pow_sub_one_splits Polynomial.X_pow_sub_one_splits
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then
`∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic' i K = X ^ n - 1`. -/
theorem prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic' i K = X ^ n - 1 := by
classical
have hd : (n.divisors : Set ℕ).PairwiseDisjoint fun k => primitiveRoots k K :=
fun x _ y _ hne => IsPrimitiveRoot.disjoint hne
simp only [X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod hpos h, cyclotomic', ← Finset.prod_biUnion hd,
h.nthRoots_one_eq_biUnion_primitiveRoots]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one Polynomial.prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then
`cyclotomic' n K = (X ^ k - 1) /ₘ (∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors k, cyclotomic' i K)`. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one_div {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
cyclotomic' n K = (X ^ n - 1) /ₘ ∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors n, cyclotomic' i K := by
rw [← prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one hpos h, ← Nat.cons_self_properDivisors hpos.ne',
Finset.prod_cons]
have prod_monic : (∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors n, cyclotomic' i K).Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic
intro i _
exact cyclotomic'.monic i K
rw [(div_modByMonic_unique (cyclotomic' n K) 0 prod_monic _).1]
simp only [degree_zero, zero_add]
refine ⟨by rw [mul_comm], ?_⟩
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
intro h
exact Monic.ne_zero prod_monic (degree_eq_bot.1 h)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one_div Polynomial.cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one_div
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then `cyclotomic' n K` comes from a
monic polynomial with integer coefficients. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 200 | 232 | theorem int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) : ∃ P : ℤ[X], map (Int.castRingHom K) P =
cyclotomic' n K ∧ P.degree = (cyclotomic' n K).degree ∧ P.Monic := by |
refine lifts_and_degree_eq_and_monic ?_ (cyclotomic'.monic n K)
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with k ihk generalizing ζ
rcases k.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· use 1
simp only [cyclotomic'_zero, coe_mapRingHom, Polynomial.map_one]
let B : K[X] := ∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors k, cyclotomic' i K
have Bmo : B.Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic
intro i _
exact cyclotomic'.monic i K
have Bint : B ∈ lifts (Int.castRingHom K) := by
refine Subsemiring.prod_mem (lifts (Int.castRingHom K)) ?_
intro x hx
have xsmall := (Nat.mem_properDivisors.1 hx).2
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := (Nat.mem_properDivisors.1 hx).1
rw [mul_comm] at hd
exact ihk x xsmall (h.pow hpos hd)
replace Bint := lifts_and_degree_eq_and_monic Bint Bmo
obtain ⟨B₁, hB₁, _, hB₁mo⟩ := Bint
let Q₁ : ℤ[X] := (X ^ k - 1) /ₘ B₁
have huniq : 0 + B * cyclotomic' k K = X ^ k - 1 ∧ (0 : K[X]).degree < B.degree := by
constructor
· rw [zero_add, mul_comm, ← prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one hpos h, ←
Nat.cons_self_properDivisors hpos.ne', Finset.prod_cons]
· simpa only [degree_zero, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot] using Bmo.ne_zero
replace huniq := div_modByMonic_unique (cyclotomic' k K) (0 : K[X]) Bmo huniq
simp only [lifts, RingHom.mem_rangeS]
use Q₁
rw [coe_mapRingHom, map_divByMonic (Int.castRingHom K) hB₁mo, hB₁, ← huniq.1]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attr
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.FinsetOps
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.finset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Finite sets
Terms of type `Finset α` are one way of talking about finite subsets of `α` in mathlib.
Below, `Finset α` is defined as a structure with 2 fields:
1. `val` is a `Multiset α` of elements;
2. `nodup` is a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
Finsets in Lean are constructive in that they have an underlying `List` that enumerates their
elements. In particular, any function that uses the data of the underlying list cannot depend on its
ordering. This is handled on the `Multiset` level by multiset API, so in most cases one needn't
worry about it explicitly.
Finsets give a basic foundation for defining finite sums and products over types:
1. `∑ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`;
2. `∏ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`.
Lean refers to these operations as big operators.
More information can be found in `Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset`.
Finsets are directly used to define fintypes in Lean.
A `Fintype α` instance for a type `α` consists of a universal `Finset α` containing every term of
`α`, called `univ`. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
There is also `univ'`, the noncomputable partner to `univ`,
which is defined to be `α` as a finset if `α` is finite,
and the empty finset otherwise. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
`Finset.card`, the size of a finset is defined in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card`.
This is then used to define `Fintype.card`, the size of a type.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset`: Defines a type for the finite subsets of `α`.
Constructing a `Finset` requires two pieces of data: `val`, a `Multiset α` of elements,
and `nodup`, a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
* `Finset.instMembershipFinset`: Defines membership `a ∈ (s : Finset α)`.
* `Finset.instCoeTCFinsetSet`: Provides a coercion `s : Finset α` to `s : Set α`.
* `Finset.instCoeSortFinsetType`: Coerce `s : Finset α` to the type of all `x ∈ s`.
* `Finset.induction_on`: Induction on finsets. To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty finset, and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the finset obtained by inserting a new element.
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Finset constructions
* `Finset.instSingletonFinset`: Denoted by `{a}`; the finset consisting of one element.
* `Finset.empty`: Denoted by `∅`. The finset associated to any type consisting of no elements.
* `Finset.range`: For any `n : ℕ`, `range n` is equal to `{0, 1, ... , n - 1} ⊆ ℕ`.
This convention is consistent with other languages and normalizes `card (range n) = n`.
Beware, `n` is not in `range n`.
* `Finset.attach`: Given `s : Finset α`, `attach s` forms a finset of elements of the subtype
`{a // a ∈ s}`; in other words, it attaches elements to a proof of membership in the set.
### Finsets from functions
* `Finset.filter`: Given a decidable predicate `p : α → Prop`, `s.filter p` is
the finset consisting of those elements in `s` satisfying the predicate `p`.
### The lattice structure on subsets of finsets
There is a natural lattice structure on the subsets of a set.
In Lean, we use lattice notation to talk about things involving unions and intersections. See
`Mathlib.Order.Lattice`. For the lattice structure on finsets, `⊥` is called `bot` with `⊥ = ∅` and
`⊤` is called `top` with `⊤ = univ`.
* `Finset.instHasSubsetFinset`: Lots of API about lattices, otherwise behaves as one would expect.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: Defines `s ∪ t` (or `s ⊔ t`) as the union of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.sup`/`Finset.biUnion` for finite unions.
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: Defines `s ∩ t` (or `s ⊓ t`) as the intersection of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.inf` for finite intersections.
### Operations on two or more finsets
* `insert` and `Finset.cons`: For any `a : α`, `insert s a` returns `s ∪ {a}`. `cons s a h`
returns the same except that it requires a hypothesis stating that `a` is not already in `s`.
This does not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.erase`: For any `a : α`, `erase s a` returns `s` with the element `a` removed.
* `Finset.instSDiffFinset`: Defines the set difference `s \ t` for finsets `s` and `t`.
* `Finset.product`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of `α × β`.
For arbitrary dependent products, see `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi`.
### Predicates on finsets
* `Disjoint`: defined via the lattice structure on finsets; two sets are disjoint if their
intersection is empty.
* `Finset.Nonempty`: A finset is nonempty if it has elements. This is equivalent to saying `s ≠ ∅`.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib.Data.Equiv` files describe a general type of equivalence, so look in there for any
lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that `s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen
assert_not_exists Multiset.Powerset
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Multiset Subtype Nat Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure Finset (α : Type*) where
/-- The underlying multiset -/
val : Multiset α
/-- `val` contains no duplicates -/
nodup : Nodup val
#align finset Finset
instance Multiset.canLiftFinset {α} : CanLift (Multiset α) (Finset α) Finset.val Multiset.Nodup :=
⟨fun m hm => ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
#align multiset.can_lift_finset Multiset.canLiftFinset
namespace Finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : Finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩, ⟨t, _⟩, h => by cases h; rfl
#align finset.eq_of_veq Finset.eq_of_veq
theorem val_injective : Injective (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ => eq_of_veq
#align finset.val_injective Finset.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem val_inj {s t : Finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
val_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.val_inj Finset.val_inj
@[simp]
theorem dedup_eq_self [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : dedup s.1 = s.1 :=
s.2.dedup
#align finset.dedup_eq_self Finset.dedup_eq_self
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Finset α)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
#align finset.has_decidable_eq Finset.decidableEq
/-! ### membership -/
instance : Membership α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_def Finset.mem_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_val {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s.1 ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_val Finset.mem_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @Finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_mk Finset.mem_mk
instance decidableMem [_h : DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Multiset.decidableMem _ _
#align finset.decidable_mem Finset.decidableMem
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ a = b) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ b = a) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
/-! ### set coercion -/
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
@[coe] def toSet (s : Finset α) : Set α :=
{ a | a ∈ s }
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : CoeTC (Finset α) (Set α) :=
⟨toSet⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ (s : Set α) ↔ a ∈ (s : Finset α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_coe Finset.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem {α} {s : Finset α} : { a | a ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align finset.set_of_mem Finset.setOf_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_mem {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) : ↑x ∈ s :=
x.2
#align finset.coe_mem Finset.coe_mem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mk_coe {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) {h} : (⟨x, h⟩ : (s : Set α)) = x :=
Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align finset.mk_coe Finset.mk_coe
instance decidableMem' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ (s : Set α)) :=
s.decidableMem _
#align finset.decidable_mem' Finset.decidableMem'
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans <| s₁.nodup.ext s₂.nodup
#align finset.ext_iff Finset.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
#align finset.ext Finset.ext
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
Set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
#align finset.coe_inj Finset.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective {α} : Injective ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) := fun _s _t => coe_inj.1
#align finset.coe_injective Finset.coe_injective
/-! ### type coercion -/
/-- Coercion from a finset to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type u} : CoeSort (Finset α) (Type u) :=
⟨fun s => { x // x ∈ s }⟩
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem forall_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align finset.forall_coe Finset.forall_coe
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem exists_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align finset.exists_coe Finset.exists_coe
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift (ι : Type*) (α : ι → Type*) [_ne : ∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
(s : Finset ι) : CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α (· ∈ s)
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift' (ι α : Type*) [_ne : Nonempty α] (s : Finset ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiFinsetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift' Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift'
instance FinsetCoe.canLift (s : Finset α) : CanLift α s (↑) fun a => a ∈ s where
prf a ha := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align finset.finset_coe.can_lift Finset.FinsetCoe.canLift
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sort_coe (s : Finset α) : ((s : Set α) : Sort _) = s :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_sort_coe Finset.coe_sort_coe
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
section Subset
variable {s t : Finset α}
instance : HasSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Finset α) where
le := (· ⊆ ·)
lt := (· ⊂ ·)
le_refl s a := id
le_trans s t u hst htu a ha := htu <| hst ha
le_antisymm s t hst hts := ext fun a => ⟨@hst _, @hts _⟩
instance : IsRefl (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
theorem subset_def : s ⊆ t ↔ s.1 ⊆ t.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_def Finset.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.ssubset_def Finset.ssubset_def
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ s :=
Multiset.Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.refl Finset.Subset.refl
protected theorem Subset.rfl {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.rfl Finset.Subset.rfl
protected theorem subset_of_eq {s t : Finset α} (h : s = t) : s ⊆ t :=
h ▸ Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset_of_eq Finset.subset_of_eq
theorem Subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ :=
Multiset.Subset.trans
#align finset.subset.trans Finset.Subset.trans
theorem Superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ := fun h' h =>
Subset.trans h h'
#align finset.superset.trans Finset.Superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
Multiset.mem_of_subset
#align finset.mem_of_subset Finset.mem_of_subset
theorem not_mem_mono {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) {a : α} : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align finset.not_mem_mono Finset.not_mem_mono
theorem Subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext fun a => ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
#align finset.subset.antisymm Finset.Subset.antisymm
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_iff Finset.subset_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_subset Finset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
le_iff_subset s₁.2
#align finset.val_le_iff Finset.val_le_iff
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
#align finset.subset.antisymm_iff Finset.Subset.antisymm_iff
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∉ t := by simp only [← coe_subset, Set.not_subset, mem_coe]
#align finset.not_subset Finset.not_subset
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.le_eq_subset Finset.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_subset : ((· < ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.lt_eq_subset Finset.lt_eq_subset
theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.le_iff_subset Finset.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.lt_iff_ssubset Finset.lt_iff_ssubset
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁ by simp only [Set.ssubset_def, Finset.coe_subset]
#align finset.coe_ssubset Finset.coe_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff <| not_congr val_le_iff
#align finset.val_lt_iff Finset.val_lt_iff
lemma val_strictMono : StrictMono (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ ↦ val_lt_iff.2
theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne _ _ s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
#align finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊂ s₂) : ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align finset.exists_of_ssubset Finset.exists_of_ssubset
instance isWellFounded_ssubset : IsWellFounded (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
Subrelation.isWellFounded (InvImage _ _) val_lt_iff.2
#align finset.is_well_founded_ssubset Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Finset α) :=
Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
#align finset.is_well_founded_lt Finset.wellFoundedLT
end Subset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
/-! ### Order embedding from `Finset α` to `Set α` -/
/-- Coercion to `Set α` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α :=
⟨⟨(↑), coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
#align finset.coe_emb Finset.coeEmb
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeEmb : ⇑(coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α) = ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_coe_emb Finset.coe_coeEmb
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.Nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def Nonempty (s : Finset α) : Prop := ∃ x : α, x ∈ s
#align finset.nonempty Finset.Nonempty
-- Porting note: Much longer than in Lean3
instance decidableNonempty {s : Finset α} : Decidable s.Nonempty :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (motive := fun s : Multiset α => Decidable (∃ a, a ∈ s)) s.1
(fun l : List α =>
match l with
| [] => isFalse <| by simp
| a::l => isTrue ⟨a, by simp⟩)
#align finset.decidable_nonempty Finset.decidableNonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonempty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_nonempty Finset.coe_nonempty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : Nonempty (s : Type _) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align finset.nonempty_coe_sort Finset.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.to_set⟩ := coe_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.to_set Finset.Nonempty.to_set
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align finset.nonempty.coe_sort Finset.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem Nonempty.exists_mem {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x : α, x ∈ s :=
h
#align finset.nonempty.bex Finset.Nonempty.exists_mem
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias Nonempty.bex := Nonempty.exists_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono {s t : Finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
Set.Nonempty.mono hst hs
#align finset.nonempty.mono Finset.Nonempty.mono
theorem Nonempty.forall_const {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) {p : Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s, p) ↔ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
⟨fun h => h x hx, fun h _ _ => h⟩
#align finset.nonempty.forall_const Finset.Nonempty.forall_const
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty s :=
nonempty_coe_sort.2
#align finset.nonempty.to_subtype Finset.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _hx⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align finset.nonempty.to_type Finset.Nonempty.to_type
/-! ### empty -/
section Empty
variable {s : Finset α}
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : Finset α :=
⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
#align finset.empty Finset.empty
instance : EmptyCollection (Finset α) :=
⟨Finset.empty⟩
instance inhabitedFinset : Inhabited (Finset α) :=
⟨∅⟩
#align finset.inhabited_finset Finset.inhabitedFinset
@[simp]
theorem empty_val : (∅ : Finset α).1 = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.empty_val Finset.empty_val
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : Finset α) := by
-- Porting note: was `id`. `a ∈ List.nil` is no longer definitionally equal to `False`
simp only [mem_def, empty_val, not_mem_zero, not_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_empty Finset.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Finset α).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => not_mem_empty x hx
#align finset.not_nonempty_empty Finset.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, nodup_zero⟩ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_zero Finset.mk_zero
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ := fun e =>
not_mem_empty a <| e ▸ h
#align finset.ne_empty_of_mem Finset.ne_empty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
(Exists.elim h) fun _a => ne_empty_of_mem
#align finset.nonempty.ne_empty Finset.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
zero_subset _
#align finset.empty_subset Finset.empty_subset
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
#align finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
-- Porting note: used `id`
⟨by rintro rfl x; apply not_mem_empty, fun h => eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
#align finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero {s : Finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
@val_inj _ s ∅
#align finset.val_eq_zero Finset.val_eq_zero
theorem subset_empty {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
#align finset.subset_empty Finset.subset_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_ssubset_empty (s : Finset α) : ¬s ⊂ ∅ := fun h =>
let ⟨_, he, _⟩ := exists_of_ssubset h
-- Porting note: was `he`
not_mem_empty _ he
#align finset.not_ssubset_empty Finset.not_ssubset_empty
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.Nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
#align finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
#align finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.not.trans not_not
#align finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
by_cases Or.inl fun h => Or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h)
#align finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_empty : ((∅ : Finset α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align finset.coe_empty Finset.coe_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by rw [← coe_empty, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_empty Finset.coe_eq_empty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : IsEmpty (s : Type _) ↔ s = ∅ := by
simpa using @Set.isEmpty_coe_sort α s
#align finset.is_empty_coe_sort Finset.isEmpty_coe_sort
instance instIsEmpty : IsEmpty (∅ : Finset α) :=
isEmpty_coe_sort.2 rfl
/-- A `Finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ :=
Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
#align finset.eq_empty_of_is_empty Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance : OrderBot (Finset α) where
bot := ∅
bot_le := empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.bot_eq_empty Finset.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Finset α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align finset.empty_ssubset Finset.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align finset.nonempty.empty_ssubset Finset.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
end Empty
/-! ### singleton -/
section Singleton
variable {s : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `{a} : Finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `DecidableEq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : Singleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).1 = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_val Finset.singleton_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Finset α) ↔ b = a :=
Multiset.mem_singleton
#align finset.mem_singleton Finset.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Finset α)) : x = y :=
mem_singleton.1 h
#align finset.eq_of_mem_singleton Finset.eq_of_mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : Finset α) ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr mem_singleton
#align finset.not_mem_singleton Finset.not_mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Finset α) :=
-- Porting note: was `Or.inl rfl`
mem_singleton.mpr rfl
#align finset.mem_singleton_self Finset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Finset α} : s.val = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← val_inj]
rfl
#align finset.val_eq_singleton_iff Finset.val_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Finset α) := fun _a _b h =>
mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _)
#align finset.singleton_injective Finset.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj : ({a} : Finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.singleton_inj Finset.singleton_inj
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
#align finset.singleton_nonempty Finset.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
#align finset.singleton_ne_empty Finset.singleton_ne_empty
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Finset α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align finset.empty_ssubset_singleton Finset.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : (({a} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_singleton Finset.coe_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (s : Set α) = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_singleton Finset.coe_eq_singleton
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_subset_singleton : (s : Set α) ⊆ {a} ↔ s ⊆ {a} := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
@[norm_cast]
lemma singleton_subset_coe : {a} ⊆ (s : Set α) ↔ {a} ⊆ s := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor <;> intro t
· rw [t]
exact ⟨Finset.mem_singleton_self _, fun _ => Finset.mem_singleton.1⟩
· ext
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨t.right _, fun r => r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· rintro ⟨hne, h_uniq⟩
rw [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem]
refine ⟨?_, h_uniq⟩
rw [← h_uniq hne.choose hne.choose_spec]
exact hne.choose_spec
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
theorem nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default [Unique α] {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty ↔ s = {default} := by
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default Finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
alias ⟨Nonempty.eq_singleton_default, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
#align finset.nonempty.eq_singleton_default Finset.Nonempty.eq_singleton_default
theorem singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : Finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s := by
simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, ExistsUnique]
#align finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem singleton_subset_set_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : ↑({a} : Finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [coe_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
#align finset.singleton_subset_set_iff Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
#align finset.singleton_subset_iff Finset.singleton_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton, Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq, coe_eq_empty, coe_eq_singleton]
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff Finset.subset_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Finset α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align finset.singleton_subset_singleton Finset.singleton_subset_singleton
protected theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align finset.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => mem_singleton
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff' Finset.subset_singleton_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_singleton, Set.ssubset_singleton_iff, coe_eq_empty]
#align finset.ssubset_singleton_iff Finset.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
/-- A finset is nontrivial if it has at least two elements. -/
protected abbrev Nontrivial (s : Finset α) : Prop := (s : Set α).Nontrivial
#align finset.nontrivial Finset.Nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_empty : ¬ (∅ : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_empty Finset.not_nontrivial_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_singleton : ¬ ({a} : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_singleton Finset.not_nontrivial_singleton
theorem Nontrivial.ne_singleton (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ {a} := by
rintro rfl; exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs
#align finset.nontrivial.ne_singleton Finset.Nontrivial.ne_singleton
nonrec lemma Nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.Nontrivial) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := hs.exists_ne _
theorem eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton]; exact Set.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha
#align finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨Nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
#align finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton Finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton
theorem Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.Nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.Nontrivial :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left <| Exists.intro a
#align finset.nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
instance instNontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Finset α) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨⟨{a}, ∅, singleton_ne_empty _⟩⟩
#align finset.nontrivial' Finset.instNontrivial
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Finset α) where
default := ∅
uniq _ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
instance (i : α) : Unique ({i} : Finset α) where
default := ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩
uniq j := Subtype.ext <| mem_singleton.mp j.2
@[simp]
lemma default_singleton (i : α) : ((default : ({i} : Finset α)) : α) = i := rfl
end Singleton
/-! ### cons -/
section Cons
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `DecidableEq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : Finset α :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
#align finset.cons Finset.cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {h} : b ∈ s.cons a h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons
#align finset.mem_cons Finset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Finset α} {hb : b ∉ s} (ha : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s hb :=
Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem ha
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) {h} : a ∈ cons a s h :=
Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _
#align finset.mem_cons_self Finset.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.cons_val Finset.cons_val
theorem forall_mem_cons (h : a ∉ s) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.forall_mem_cons Finset.forall_mem_cons
/-- Useful in proofs by induction. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_cons {p : α → Prop} {h : a ∉ s} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) (x)
(h : x ∈ s) : p x :=
H _ <| mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.forall_of_forall_cons Finset.forall_of_forall_cons
@[simp]
theorem mk_cons {s : Multiset α} (h : (a ::ₘ s).Nodup) :
(⟨a ::ₘ s, h⟩ : Finset α) = cons a ⟨s, (nodup_cons.1 h).2⟩ (nodup_cons.1 h).1 :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_cons Finset.mk_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_empty (a : α) : cons a ∅ (not_mem_empty _) = {a} := rfl
#align finset.cons_empty Finset.cons_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_cons.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩
#align finset.nonempty_cons Finset.nonempty_cons
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk {m : Multiset α} {hm} : (⟨m, hm⟩ : Finset α).Nonempty ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
induction m using Multiset.induction_on <;> simp
#align finset.nonempty_mk Finset.nonempty_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_cons {a s h} : (@cons α a s h : Set α) = insert a (s : Set α) := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_cons Finset.coe_cons
theorem subset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.subset_cons _ _
#align finset.subset_cons Finset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.ssubset_cons h
#align finset.ssubset_cons Finset.ssubset_cons
theorem cons_subset {h : a ∉ s} : s.cons a h ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
Multiset.cons_subset
#align finset.cons_subset Finset.cons_subset
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset_cons {hs ht} : s.cons a hs ⊆ t.cons a ht ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rwa [← coe_subset, coe_cons, coe_cons, Set.insert_subset_insert_iff, coe_subset]
#align finset.cons_subset_cons Finset.cons_subset_cons
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∉ s), s.cons a h ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset (ssubset_cons _) h⟩
obtain ⟨a, hs, ht⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, cons_subset.2 ⟨hs, h.subset⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset
end Cons
/-! ### disjoint -/
section Disjoint
variable {f : α → β} {s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
⟨fun h a hs ht => not_mem_empty a <|
singleton_subset_iff.mp (h (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hs) (singleton_subset_iff.mpr ht)),
fun h _ hs ht _ ha => (h (hs ha) (ht ha)).elim⟩
#align finset.disjoint_left Finset.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by
rw [_root_.disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align finset.disjoint_right Finset.disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b := by
simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
#align finset.disjoint_iff_ne Finset.disjoint_iff_ne
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_val : s.1.Disjoint t.1 ↔ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.disjoint_val Finset.disjoint_val
theorem _root_.Disjoint.forall_ne_finset (h : Disjoint s t) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : a ≠ b :=
disjoint_iff_ne.1 h _ ha _ hb
#align disjoint.forall_ne_finset Disjoint.forall_ne_finset
theorem not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
disjoint_left.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => by
rw [Classical.not_imp, not_not]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff Finset.not_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_left.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_left Finset.disjoint_of_subset_left
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_right.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_right.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_right Finset.disjoint_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_left (s : Finset α) : Disjoint ∅ s :=
disjoint_bot_left
#align finset.disjoint_empty_left Finset.disjoint_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_right (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s ∅ :=
disjoint_bot_right
#align finset.disjoint_empty_right Finset.disjoint_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint (singleton a) s ↔ a ∉ s := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_left Finset.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s (singleton a) ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_right Finset.disjoint_singleton_right
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Finset α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
rw [disjoint_singleton_left, mem_singleton]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton Finset.disjoint_singleton
theorem disjoint_self_iff_empty (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s s ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_self
#align finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty Finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem disjoint_coe : Disjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [Finset.disjoint_left, Set.disjoint_left, mem_coe]
#align finset.disjoint_coe Finset.disjoint_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_coe {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint (fun i => f i : ι → Set α) ↔ s.PairwiseDisjoint f :=
forall₅_congr fun _ _ _ _ _ => disjoint_coe
#align finset.pairwise_disjoint_coe Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_coe
end Disjoint
/-! ### disjoint union -/
/-- `disjUnion s t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`.
It is the same as `s ∪ t`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The hypothesis
ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) : Finset α :=
⟨s.1 + t.1, Multiset.nodup_add.2 ⟨s.2, t.2, disjoint_val.2 h⟩⟩
#align finset.disj_union Finset.disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjUnion {α s t h a} : a ∈ @disjUnion α s t h ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; rcases t with ⟨⟨t⟩⟩; apply List.mem_append
#align finset.mem_disj_union Finset.mem_disjUnion
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_disjUnion {s t : Finset α} (h : Disjoint s t) :
(disjUnion s t h : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem disjUnion_comm (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
disjUnion s t h = disjUnion t s h.symm :=
eq_of_veq <| add_comm _ _
#align finset.disj_union_comm Finset.disjUnion_comm
@[simp]
theorem empty_disjUnion (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint ∅ t := disjoint_bot_left) :
disjUnion ∅ t h = t :=
eq_of_veq <| zero_add _
#align finset.empty_disj_union Finset.empty_disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_empty (s : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right) :
disjUnion s ∅ h = s :=
eq_of_veq <| add_zero _
#align finset.disj_union_empty Finset.disjUnion_empty
theorem singleton_disjUnion (a : α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint {a} t) :
disjUnion {a} t h = cons a t (disjoint_singleton_left.mp h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_add _ _
#align finset.singleton_disj_union Finset.singleton_disjUnion
theorem disjUnion_singleton (s : Finset α) (a : α) (h : Disjoint s {a}) :
disjUnion s {a} h = cons a s (disjoint_singleton_right.mp h) := by
rw [disjUnion_comm, singleton_disjUnion]
#align finset.disj_union_singleton Finset.disjUnion_singleton
/-! ### insert -/
section Insert
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `insert a s` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. -/
instance : Insert α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩⟩
theorem insert_def (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩ :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_def Finset.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem insert_val (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = ndinsert a s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_val Finset.insert_val
theorem insert_val' (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = dedup (a ::ₘ s.1) := by
rw [dedup_cons, dedup_eq_self]; rfl
#align finset.insert_val' Finset.insert_val'
theorem insert_val_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 := by
rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.insert_val_of_not_mem Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert : a ∈ insert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
mem_ndinsert
#align finset.mem_insert Finset.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) : a ∈ insert a s :=
mem_ndinsert_self a s.1
#align finset.mem_insert_self Finset.mem_insert_self
theorem mem_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ insert b s :=
mem_ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.mem_insert_of_mem Finset.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (h : b ∈ insert a s) : b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
(mem_insert.1 h).resolve_left
#align finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (ha : b ∈ insert a s) (hb : b ∉ s) : b = a :=
(mem_insert.1 ha).resolve_right hb
#align finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
/-- A version of `LawfulSingleton.insert_emptyc_eq` that works with `dsimp`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF] lemma insert_empty : insert a (∅ : Finset α) = {a} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_eq_insert (a s h) : @cons α a s h = insert a s :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.cons_eq_insert Finset.cons_eq_insert
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : ↑(insert a s) = (insert a s : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_coe, mem_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff]
#align finset.coe_insert Finset.coe_insert
theorem mem_insert_coe {s : Finset α} {x y : α} : x ∈ insert y s ↔ x ∈ insert y (s : Set α) := by
simp
#align finset.mem_insert_coe Finset.mem_insert_coe
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => by ext; simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
eq_of_veq <| ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.insert_eq_of_mem Finset.insert_eq_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert_self _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align finset.insert_eq_self Finset.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align finset.insert_ne_self Finset.insert_ne_self
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : Finset α) = {a} :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_singleton_self _
#align finset.pair_eq_singleton Finset.pair_eq_singleton
theorem Insert.comm (a b : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, or_left_comm]
#align finset.insert.comm Finset.Insert.comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pair {a b : α} : (({a, b} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a, b} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_pair Finset.coe_pair
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_pair {s : Finset α} {a b : α} : (s : Set α) = {a, b} ↔ s = {a, b} := by
rw [← coe_pair, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_pair Finset.coe_eq_pair
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Finset α) = {b, a} :=
Insert.comm a b ∅
#align finset.pair_comm Finset.pair_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, ← or_assoc, or_self_iff]
#align finset.insert_idem Finset.insert_idem
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩
#align finset.insert_nonempty Finset.insert_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
(insert_nonempty a s).ne_empty
#align finset.insert_ne_empty Finset.insert_ne_empty
-- Porting note: explicit universe annotation is no longer required.
instance (i : α) (s : Finset α) : Nonempty ((insert i s : Finset α) : Set α) :=
(Finset.coe_nonempty.mpr (s.insert_nonempty i)).to_subtype
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem (s t : Finset α) {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ≠ insert a t := by
contrapose! h
simp [h]
#align finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem Finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, forall_eq, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.insert_subset Finset.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha,hs⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a s := fun _b => mem_insert_of_mem
#align finset.subset_insert Finset.subset_insert
@[gcongr]
theorem insert_subset_insert (a : α) {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
insert_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, Subset.trans h (subset_insert _ _)⟩
#align finset.insert_subset_insert Finset.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] lemma insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp_rw [← coe_subset]; simp [-coe_subset, ha]
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert_self _ _) ha, congr_arg (insert · s)⟩
#align finset.insert_inj Finset.insert_inj
theorem insert_inj_on (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn (fun a => insert a s) sᶜ := fun _ h _ _ =>
(insert_inj h).1
#align finset.insert_inj_on Finset.insert_inj_on
theorem ssubset_iff : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := mod_cast @Set.ssubset_iff_insert α s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff Finset.ssubset_iff
theorem ssubset_insert (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff.mpr ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align finset.ssubset_insert Finset.ssubset_insert
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (empty : p ∅)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : ∀ s, p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ => by
induction s using Multiset.induction with
| empty => exact empty
| cons a s IH =>
rw [mk_cons nd]
exact cons a _ _ (IH _)
#align finset.cons_induction Finset.cons_induction
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : p s :=
cons_induction h₁ h₂ s
#align finset.cons_induction_on Finset.cons_induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (empty : p ∅)
(insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : ∀ s, p s :=
cons_induction empty fun a s ha => (s.cons_eq_insert a ha).symm ▸ insert ha
#align finset.induction Finset.induction
/-- To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α)
(empty : p ∅) (insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
Finset.induction empty insert s
#align finset.induction_on Finset.induction_on
/-- To prove a proposition about `S : Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α ⊆ S`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element of `S`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (S : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Finset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) _ S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ has hqs hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 hs
h₂ hS sS has (hqs sS))
(Finset.Subset.refl S)
#align finset.induction_on' Finset.induction_on'
/-- To prove a proposition about a nonempty `s : Finset α`, it suffices to show it holds for all
singletons and that if it holds for nonempty `t : Finset α`, then it also holds for the `Finset`
obtained by inserting an element in `t`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Nonempty.cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : ∀ s : Finset α, s.Nonempty → Prop}
(singleton : ∀ a, p {a} (singleton_nonempty _))
(cons : ∀ a s (h : a ∉ s) (hs), p s hs → p (Finset.cons a s h) (nonempty_cons h))
{s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : p s hs := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => exact (not_nonempty_empty hs).elim
| cons a t ha h =>
obtain rfl | ht := t.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact singleton a
· exact cons a t ha ht (h ht)
#align finset.nonempty.cons_induction Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction
lemma Nonempty.exists_cons_eq (hs : s.Nonempty) : ∃ t a ha, cons a t ha = s :=
hs.cons_induction (fun a ↦ ⟨∅, a, _, cons_empty _⟩) fun _ _ _ _ _ ↦ ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩
/-- Inserting an element to a finite set is equivalent to the option type. -/
def subtypeInsertEquivOption {t : Finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
{ i // i ∈ insert x t } ≃ Option { i // i ∈ t } where
toFun y := if h : ↑y = x then none else some ⟨y, (mem_insert.mp y.2).resolve_left h⟩
invFun y := (y.elim ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ _⟩) fun z => ⟨z, mem_insert_of_mem z.2⟩
left_inv y := by
by_cases h : ↑y = x
· simp only [Subtype.ext_iff, h, Option.elim, dif_pos, Subtype.coe_mk]
· simp only [h, Option.elim, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_eta, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv := by
rintro (_ | y)
· simp only [Option.elim, dif_pos]
· have : ↑y ≠ x := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact h y.2
simp only [this, Option.elim, Subtype.eta, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align finset.subtype_insert_equiv_option Finset.subtypeInsertEquivOption
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_left : Disjoint (insert a s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_insert, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_left Finset.disjoint_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_right : Disjoint s (insert a t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_insert_left, _root_.disjoint_comm]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_right Finset.disjoint_insert_right
end Insert
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s ∪ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∪ t` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Union (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, t.2.ndunion s.1⟩⟩
/-- `s ∩ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∩ t` iff `a ∈ s` and `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Inter (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, s.2.ndinter t.1⟩⟩
instance : Lattice (Finset α) :=
{ Finset.partialOrder with
sup := (· ∪ ·)
sup_le := fun _ _ _ hs ht _ ha => (mem_ndunion.1 ha).elim (fun h => hs h) fun h => ht h
le_sup_left := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inl h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inr h
inf := (· ∩ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ht hu _ h => mem_ndinter.2 ⟨ht h, hu h⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).1
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).2 }
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : (Sup.sup : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Union.union :=
rfl
#align finset.sup_eq_union Finset.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : (Inf.inf : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Inter.inter :=
rfl
#align finset.inf_eq_inter Finset.inf_eq_inter
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
instance decidableDisjoint (U V : Finset α) : Decidable (Disjoint U V) :=
decidable_of_iff _ disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.decidable_disjoint Finset.decidableDisjoint
/-! #### union -/
theorem union_val_nd (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = ndunion s.1 t.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.union_val_nd Finset.union_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem union_val (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = s.1 ∪ t.1 :=
ndunion_eq_union s.2
#align finset.union_val Finset.union_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
mem_ndunion
#align finset.mem_union Finset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.disj_union_eq_union Finset.disjUnion_eq_union
theorem mem_union_left (t : Finset α) (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inl h
#align finset.mem_union_left Finset.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right (s : Finset α) (h : a ∈ t) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.mem_union_right Finset.mem_union_right
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s ∪ t, p a) ↔ (∀ a ∈ s, p a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ t, p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a => h a ∘ mem_union_left _, fun b => h b ∘ mem_union_right _⟩,
fun h _ab hab => (mem_union.mp hab).elim (h.1 _) (h.2 _)⟩
#align finset.forall_mem_union Finset.forall_mem_union
theorem not_mem_union : a ∉ s ∪ t ↔ a ∉ s ∧ a ∉ t := by rw [mem_union, not_or]
#align finset.not_mem_union Finset.not_mem_union
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∪ s₂) = (s₁ ∪ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_union
#align finset.coe_union Finset.coe_union
theorem union_subset (hs : s ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u → s ∪ t ⊆ u :=
sup_le <| le_iff_subset.2 hs
#align finset.union_subset Finset.union_subset
theorem subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_left _
#align finset.subset_union_left Finset.subset_union_left
theorem subset_union_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₂ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_right _
#align finset.subset_union_right Finset.subset_union_right
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union (hsu : s ⊆ u) (htv : t ⊆ v) : s ∪ t ⊆ u ∪ v :=
sup_le_sup (le_iff_subset.2 hsu) htv
#align finset.union_subset_union Finset.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align finset.union_subset_union_left Finset.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align finset.union_subset_union_right Finset.union_subset_union_right
theorem union_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ = s₂ ∪ s₁ := sup_comm _ _
#align finset.union_comm Finset.union_comm
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) := sup_assoc _ _ _
#align finset.union_assoc Finset.union_assoc
instance : Std.Associative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_idempotent (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s := sup_idem _
#align finset.union_idempotent Finset.union_idempotent
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_idempotent⟩
theorem union_subset_left (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u :=
subset_union_left.trans h
#align finset.union_subset_left Finset.union_subset_left
theorem union_subset_right {s t u : Finset α} (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u :=
Subset.trans subset_union_right h
#align finset.union_subset_right Finset.union_subset_right
theorem union_left_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_union, or_left_comm]
#align finset.union_left_comm Finset.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ t :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc, @or_comm (x ∈ t)]
#align finset.union_right_comm Finset.union_right_comm
theorem union_self (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s :=
union_idempotent s
#align finset.union_self Finset.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∪ ∅ = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.union_empty Finset.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∪ s = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_union Finset.empty_union
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inl {s t : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_left
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inr {s t : Finset α} (h : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_right
theorem insert_eq (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = {a} ∪ s :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_eq Finset.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem insert_union (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_assoc]
#align finset.insert_union Finset.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_left_comm]
#align finset.union_insert Finset.union_insert
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Finset α) :
insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t := by
simp only [insert_union, union_insert, insert_idem]
#align finset.insert_union_distrib Finset.insert_union_distrib
@[simp] lemma union_eq_left : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s := sup_eq_left
#align finset.union_eq_left_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_left
@[simp] lemma left_eq_union : s = s ∪ t ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_left]
#align finset.left_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.left_eq_union
@[simp] lemma union_eq_right : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t := sup_eq_right
#align finset.union_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_right
@[simp] lemma right_eq_union : s = t ∪ s ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_right]
#align finset.right_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.right_eq_union
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.union_congr_left Finset.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.union_congr_right Finset.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_left Finset.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_right Finset.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_left Finset.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_right Finset.disjoint_union_right
/-- To prove a relation on pairs of `Finset X`, it suffices to show that it is
* symmetric,
* it holds when one of the `Finset`s is empty,
* it holds for pairs of singletons,
* if it holds for `[a, c]` and for `[b, c]`, then it holds for `[a ∪ b, c]`.
-/
theorem induction_on_union (P : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) (symm : ∀ {a b}, P a b → P b a)
(empty_right : ∀ {a}, P a ∅) (singletons : ∀ {a b}, P {a} {b})
(union_of : ∀ {a b c}, P a c → P b c → P (a ∪ b) c) : ∀ a b, P a b := by
intro a b
refine Finset.induction_on b empty_right fun x s _xs hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
apply union_of _ (symm hi)
refine Finset.induction_on a empty_right fun a t _ta hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
exact union_of singletons (symm hi)
#align finset.induction_on_union Finset.induction_on_union
/-! #### inter -/
theorem inter_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = ndinter s₁.1 s₂.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.inter_val_nd Finset.inter_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem inter_val (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∩ s₂.1 :=
ndinter_eq_inter s₁.2
#align finset.inter_val Finset.inter_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ :=
mem_ndinter
#align finset.mem_inter Finset.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).1
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₂ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).2
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem mem_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
and_imp.1 mem_inter.2
#align finset.mem_inter_of_mem Finset.mem_inter_of_mem
theorem inter_subset_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₁ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_left
#align finset.inter_subset_left Finset.inter_subset_left
theorem inter_subset_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₂ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_right
#align finset.inter_subset_right Finset.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s₁ s₂ u : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊆ u → s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∩ u := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [subset_iff, mem_inter]
#align finset.subset_inter Finset.subset_inter
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∩ s₂) = (s₁ ∩ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_inter
#align finset.coe_inter Finset.coe_inter
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_left]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_left Finset.union_inter_cancel_left
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_right Finset.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₂ ∩ s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_comm]
#align finset.inter_comm Finset.inter_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_assoc]
#align finset.inter_assoc Finset.inter_assoc
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_left_comm]
#align finset.inter_left_comm Finset.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_right_comm]
#align finset.inter_right_comm Finset.inter_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (s : Finset α) : s ∩ s = s :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| and_self_iff
#align finset.inter_self Finset.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.inter_empty Finset.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∩ s = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_inter Finset.empty_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_self (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ s) = s := by
rw [inter_comm, union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.inter_union_self Finset.inter_union_self
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x = a ∨ x ∈ s₂ ↔ x ∈ s₂ := or_iff_right_of_imp <| by rintro rfl; exact h
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_left, this]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun x => by
have : ¬(x = a ∧ x ∈ s₂) := by rintro ⟨rfl, H⟩; exact h H
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_right, this, false_or_iff]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_not_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∈ s) : {a} ∩ s = {a} :=
show insert a ∅ ∩ s = insert a ∅ by rw [insert_inter_of_mem H, empty_inter]
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∉ s) : {a} ∩ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem <| by
simp only [mem_inter, mem_singleton]; rintro x ⟨rfl, h⟩; exact H h
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ {a} = {a} := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ {a} = ∅ := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_not_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_not_mem
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {x y s t : Finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) (h' : s ⊆ t) : x ∩ s ⊆ y ∩ t := by
intro a a_in
rw [Finset.mem_inter] at a_in ⊢
exact ⟨h a_in.1, h' a_in.2⟩
#align finset.inter_subset_inter Finset.inter_subset_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left (h : t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t ⊆ s ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl h
#align finset.inter_subset_inter_left Finset.inter_subset_inter_left
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter h Subset.rfl
#align finset.inter_subset_inter_right Finset.inter_subset_inter_right
theorem inter_subset_union : s ∩ t ⊆ s ∪ t :=
le_iff_subset.1 inf_le_sup
#align finset.inter_subset_union Finset.inter_subset_union
instance : DistribLattice (Finset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := fun a b c => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only
[sup_eq_union, inf_eq_inter, le_eq_subset, subset_iff, mem_inter, mem_union, and_imp,
or_imp, true_or_iff, imp_true_iff, true_and_iff, or_true_iff] }
@[simp]
theorem union_left_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ (s ∪ t) = s ∪ t := sup_left_idem _ _
#align finset.union_left_idem Finset.union_left_idem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem union_right_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ t = s ∪ t := sup_right_idem _ _
#align finset.union_right_idem Finset.union_right_idem
@[simp]
theorem inter_left_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (s ∩ t) = s ∩ t := inf_left_idem _ _
#align finset.inter_left_idem Finset.inter_left_idem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem inter_right_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ t = s ∩ t := inf_right_idem _ _
#align finset.inter_right_idem Finset.inter_right_idem
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align finset.inter_distrib_left Finset.inter_union_distrib_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align finset.inter_distrib_right Finset.union_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align finset.union_distrib_left Finset.union_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align finset.union_distrib_right Finset.inter_union_distrib_right
-- 2024-03-22
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_left := inter_union_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_right := union_inter_distrib_right
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_left := union_inter_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_right := inter_union_distrib_right
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_distrib_left Finset.union_union_distrib_left
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_distrib_right Finset.union_union_distrib_right
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_distrib_left Finset.inter_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_distrib_right Finset.inter_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_union_comm Finset.union_union_union_comm
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_inter_comm Finset.inter_inter_inter_comm
lemma union_eq_empty : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := sup_eq_bot_iff
#align finset.union_eq_empty_iff Finset.union_eq_empty
theorem union_subset_iff : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(sup_le_iff : s ⊔ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u)
#align finset.union_subset_iff Finset.union_subset_iff
theorem subset_inter_iff : s ⊆ t ∩ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ⊆ u :=
(le_inf_iff : s ≤ t ⊓ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u)
#align finset.subset_inter_iff Finset.subset_inter_iff
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
#align finset.inter_eq_left_iff_subset_iff_subset Finset.inter_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : t ∩ s = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_right
#align finset.inter_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.inter_eq_right
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.inter_congr_left Finset.inter_congr_left
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.inter_congr_right Finset.inter_congr_right
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
#align finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_left Finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
#align finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_right Finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_right
theorem ite_subset_union (s s' : Finset α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : ite P s s' ⊆ s ∪ s' :=
ite_le_sup s s' P
#align finset.ite_subset_union Finset.ite_subset_union
theorem inter_subset_ite (s s' : Finset α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : s ∩ s' ⊆ ite P s s' :=
inf_le_ite s s' P
#align finset.inter_subset_ite Finset.inter_subset_ite
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter Finset.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
#align finset.nonempty.not_disjoint Finset.Nonempty.not_disjoint
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
#align finset.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter Finset.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `erase s a` is the set `s - {a}`, that is, the elements of `s` which are
not equal to `a`. -/
def erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : Finset α :=
⟨_, s.2.erase a⟩
#align finset.erase Finset.erase
@[simp]
theorem erase_val (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (erase s a).1 = s.1.erase a :=
rfl
#align finset.erase_val Finset.erase_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_erase {a b : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ erase s b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ s :=
s.2.mem_erase_iff
#align finset.mem_erase Finset.mem_erase
theorem not_mem_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : a ∉ erase s a :=
s.2.not_mem_erase
#align finset.not_mem_erase Finset.not_mem_erase
-- While this can be solved by `simp`, this lemma is eligible for `dsimp`
@[nolint simpNF, simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.erase_empty Finset.erase_empty
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp $ by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
#align finset.erase_singleton Finset.erase_singleton
theorem ne_of_mem_erase : b ∈ erase s a → b ≠ a := fun h => (mem_erase.1 h).1
#align finset.ne_of_mem_erase Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
theorem mem_of_mem_erase : b ∈ erase s a → b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_of_mem_erase
#align finset.mem_of_mem_erase Finset.mem_of_mem_erase
theorem mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem : a ≠ b → a ∈ s → a ∈ erase s b := by
simp only [mem_erase]; exact And.intro
#align finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem
/-- An element of `s` that is not an element of `erase s a` must be`a`. -/
theorem eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase (hs : b ∈ s) (hsa : b ∉ s.erase a) : b = a := by
rw [mem_erase, not_and] at hsa
exact not_imp_not.mp hsa hs
#align finset.eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase Finset.eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase
@[simp]
theorem erase_eq_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase s a = s :=
eq_of_veq <| erase_of_not_mem h
#align finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem erase_eq_self : s.erase a = s ↔ a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ not_mem_erase _ _, erase_eq_of_not_mem⟩
#align finset.erase_eq_self Finset.erase_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or_iff, iff_self_iff, imp_true_iff]
#align finset.erase_insert_eq_erase Finset.erase_insert_eq_erase
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.erase_insert Finset.erase_insert
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
#align finset.erase_insert_of_ne Finset.erase_insert_of_ne
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
#align finset.erase_cons_of_ne Finset.erase_cons_of_ne
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and_iff]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
#align finset.insert_erase Finset.insert_erase
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_subset_erase (a : α) {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : erase s a ⊆ erase t a :=
val_le_iff.1 <| erase_le_erase _ <| val_le_iff.2 h
#align finset.erase_subset_erase Finset.erase_subset_erase
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase s a ⊆ s :=
Multiset.erase_subset _ _
#align finset.erase_subset Finset.erase_subset
theorem subset_erase {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ t.erase a ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.trans (erase_subset _ _), fun ha => not_mem_erase _ _ (h ha)⟩,
fun h _b hb => mem_erase.2 ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb h.2, h.1 hb⟩⟩
#align finset.subset_erase Finset.subset_erase
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : ↑(erase s a) = (s \ {a} : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_erase.trans <| by rw [and_comm, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, mem_coe]
#align finset.coe_erase Finset.coe_erase
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
#align finset.erase_ssubset Finset.erase_ssubset
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
#align finset.erase_ssubset_insert Finset.erase_ssubset_insert
theorem erase_ne_self : s.erase a ≠ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
erase_eq_self.not_left
#align finset.erase_ne_self Finset.erase_ne_self
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.erase_cons Finset.erase_cons
theorem erase_idem {a : α} {s : Finset α} : erase (erase s a) a = erase s a := by simp
#align finset.erase_idem Finset.erase_idem
theorem erase_right_comm {a b : α} {s : Finset α} : erase (erase s a) b = erase (erase s b) a := by
ext x
simp only [mem_erase, ← and_assoc]
rw [@and_comm (x ≠ a)]
#align finset.erase_right_comm Finset.erase_right_comm
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
#align finset.subset_insert_iff Finset.subset_insert_iff
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
#align finset.erase_insert_subset Finset.erase_insert_subset
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
#align finset.insert_erase_subset Finset.insert_erase_subset
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem Finset.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align finset.erase_subset_iff_of_mem Finset.erase_subset_iff_of_mem
theorem erase_inj {x y : α} (s : Finset α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.erase x = s.erase y ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase hx ?_, congr_arg _⟩
rw [← h]
simp
#align finset.erase_inj Finset.erase_inj
theorem erase_injOn (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn s.erase s := fun _ _ _ _ => (erase_inj s ‹_›).mp
#align finset.erase_inj_on Finset.erase_injOn
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
#align finset.erase_inj_on' Finset.erase_injOn'
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s \ t` is the set consisting of the elements of `s` that are not in `t`. -/
instance : SDiff (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s₁ s₂ => ⟨s₁.1 - s₂.1, nodup_of_le tsub_le_self s₁.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_val (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ \ s₂).val = s₁.val - s₂.val :=
rfl
#align finset.sdiff_val Finset.sdiff_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_sdiff : a ∈ s \ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t :=
mem_sub_of_nodup s.2
#align finset.mem_sdiff Finset.mem_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inter_sdiff_self (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ \ s₁) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem <| by
simp only [mem_inter, mem_sdiff]; rintro x ⟨h, _, hn⟩; exact hn h
#align finset.inter_sdiff_self Finset.inter_sdiff_self
instance : GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (Finset α) :=
{ sup_inf_sdiff := fun x y => by
simp only [ext_iff, mem_union, mem_sdiff, inf_eq_inter, sup_eq_union, mem_inter,
← and_or_left, em, and_true, implies_true]
inf_inf_sdiff := fun x y => by
simp only [ext_iff, inter_sdiff_self, inter_empty, inter_assoc, false_iff_iff, inf_eq_inter,
not_mem_empty, bot_eq_empty, not_false_iff, implies_true] }
theorem not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right (h : a ∈ t) : a ∉ s \ t := by
simp only [mem_sdiff, h, not_true, not_false_iff, and_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right Finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right
theorem not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left (h : a ∉ s) : a ∉ s \ t := by simp [h]
#align finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left Finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left
theorem union_sdiff_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
#align finset.union_sdiff_of_subset Finset.union_sdiff_of_subset
theorem sdiff_union_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂ \ s₁ ∪ s₁ = s₂ :=
(union_comm _ _).trans (union_sdiff_of_subset h)
#align finset.sdiff_union_of_subset Finset.sdiff_union_of_subset
lemma inter_sdiff_assoc (s t u : Finset α) : (s ∩ t) \ u = s ∩ (t \ u) := by
ext x; simp [and_assoc]
@[deprecated inter_sdiff_assoc (since := "2024-05-01")]
theorem inter_sdiff (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ u := (inter_sdiff_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align finset.inter_sdiff Finset.inter_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₂ \ s₁ ∩ s₁ = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self Finset.sdiff_inter_self
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem sdiff_self (s₁ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₁ = ∅ :=
_root_.sdiff_self
#align finset.sdiff_self Finset.sdiff_self
theorem sdiff_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
#align finset.sdiff_inter_distrib_right Finset.sdiff_inter_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self_left (s t : Finset α) : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self_left Finset.sdiff_inter_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self_right (s t : Finset α) : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self_right Finset.sdiff_inter_self_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_empty : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
#align finset.sdiff_empty Finset.sdiff_empty
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem sdiff_subset_sdiff (hst : s ⊆ t) (hvu : v ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ t \ v :=
sdiff_le_sdiff hst hvu
#align finset.sdiff_subset_sdiff Finset.sdiff_subset_sdiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sdiff (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ \ s₂) = (s₁ \ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_sdiff
#align finset.coe_sdiff Finset.coe_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem union_sdiff_self_eq_union : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self_right _ _
#align finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union Finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_union_self_eq_union : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self_left _ _
#align finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union Finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union
theorem union_sdiff_left (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_left Finset.union_sdiff_left
theorem union_sdiff_right (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_right Finset.union_sdiff_right
theorem union_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
h.sup_sdiff_cancel_left
#align finset.union_sdiff_cancel_left Finset.union_sdiff_cancel_left
theorem union_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
h.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
#align finset.union_sdiff_cancel_right Finset.union_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem union_sdiff_symm : s ∪ t \ s = t ∪ s \ t := by simp [union_comm]
#align finset.union_sdiff_symm Finset.union_sdiff_symm
theorem sdiff_union_inter (s t : Finset α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s :=
sup_sdiff_inf _ _
#align finset.sdiff_union_inter Finset.sdiff_union_inter
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem sdiff_idem (s t : Finset α) : (s \ t) \ t = s \ t :=
_root_.sdiff_idem
#align finset.sdiff_idem Finset.sdiff_idem
theorem subset_sdiff : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ Disjoint s u :=
le_iff_subset.symm.trans le_sdiff
#align finset.subset_sdiff Finset.subset_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
#align finset.sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset Finset.sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset
theorem sdiff_nonempty : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset.not
#align finset.sdiff_nonempty Finset.sdiff_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem empty_sdiff (s : Finset α) : ∅ \ s = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
#align finset.empty_sdiff Finset.empty_sdiff
theorem insert_sdiff_of_not_mem (s : Finset α) {t : Finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
insert x s \ t = insert x (s \ t) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert]
exact Set.insert_diff_of_not_mem _ h
#align finset.insert_sdiff_of_not_mem Finset.insert_sdiff_of_not_mem
theorem insert_sdiff_of_mem (s : Finset α) {x : α} (h : x ∈ t) : insert x s \ t = s \ t := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert]
exact Set.insert_diff_of_mem _ h
#align finset.insert_sdiff_of_mem Finset.insert_sdiff_of_mem
@[simp] lemma insert_sdiff_cancel (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ s = {a} := by
rw [insert_sdiff_of_not_mem _ ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_emptyc_eq]
@[simp]
theorem insert_sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : insert x s \ insert x t = s \ insert x t :=
insert_sdiff_of_mem _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
#align finset.insert_sdiff_insert Finset.insert_sdiff_insert
lemma insert_sdiff_insert' (hab : a ≠ b) (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ insert b s = {a} := by
ext; aesop
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
lemma cons_sdiff_cons (hab : a ≠ b) (ha hb) : s.cons a ha \ s.cons b hb = {a} := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, cons_eq_insert, insert_sdiff_insert' hab ha]
theorem sdiff_insert_of_not_mem {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) (t : Finset α) : s \ insert x t = s \ t := by
refine Subset.antisymm (sdiff_subset_sdiff (Subset.refl _) (subset_insert _ _)) fun y hy => ?_
simp only [mem_sdiff, mem_insert, not_or] at hy ⊢
exact ⟨hy.1, fun hxy => h <| hxy ▸ hy.1, hy.2⟩
#align finset.sdiff_insert_of_not_mem Finset.sdiff_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp] theorem sdiff_subset {s t : Finset α} : s \ t ⊆ s := le_iff_subset.mp sdiff_le
#align finset.sdiff_subset Finset.sdiff_subset
theorem sdiff_ssubset (h : t ⊆ s) (ht : t.Nonempty) : s \ t ⊂ s :=
sdiff_lt (le_iff_subset.mpr h) ht.ne_empty
#align finset.sdiff_ssubset Finset.sdiff_ssubset
theorem union_sdiff_distrib (s₁ s₂ t : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \ t = s₁ \ t ∪ s₂ \ t :=
sup_sdiff
#align finset.union_sdiff_distrib Finset.union_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_union_distrib (s t₁ t₂ : Finset α) : s \ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s \ t₁ ∩ (s \ t₂) :=
sdiff_sup
#align finset.sdiff_union_distrib Finset.sdiff_union_distrib
theorem union_sdiff_self (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_self Finset.union_sdiff_self
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ singleton a = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
#align finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase Finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
#align finset.erase_eq Finset.erase_eq
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
#align finset.disjoint_erase_comm Finset.disjoint_erase_comm
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
#align finset.disjoint_of_erase_left Finset.disjoint_of_erase_left
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
#align finset.disjoint_of_erase_right Finset.disjoint_of_erase_right
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,323 | 2,324 | theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by |
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
#align_import topology.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs products, sums, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, sum, disjoint union, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance instTopologicalSpaceSubtype {p : X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Subtype p) :=
induced (↑) t
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceProd [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X × Y) :=
induced Prod.fst t₁ ⊓ induced Prod.snd t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSum [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
coinduced Sum.inl t₁ ⊔ coinduced Sum.inr t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
#align Pi.topological_space Pi.topologicalSpace
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
#align ulift.topological_space ULift.topologicalSpace
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_mul continuous_ofMul
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_mul continuous_toMul
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_add continuous_ofAdd
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_add continuous_toAdd
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_mul isOpenMap_ofMul
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_mul isOpenMap_toMul
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_add isOpenMap_ofAdd
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_add isOpenMap_toAdd
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_mul isClosedMap_ofMul
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_mul isClosedMap_toMul
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_add isClosedMap_ofAdd
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_add isClosedMap_toAdd
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_mul nhds_ofMul
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_add nhds_ofAdd
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 (toMul x) = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_mul nhds_toMul
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 (toAdd x) = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_add nhds_toAdd
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_dual continuous_toDual
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_dual continuous_ofDual
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_dual isOpenMap_toDual
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_dual isOpenMap_ofDual
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_dual isClosedMap_toDual
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_dual isClosedMap_ofDual
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_dual nhds_toDual
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_dual nhds_ofDual
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
#align quotient.preimage_mem_nhds Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
#align dense.quotient Dense.quotient
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
#align dense_range.quotient DenseRange.quotient
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
#align sum.discrete_topology Sum.discreteTopology
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
#align sigma.discrete_topology Sigma.discreteTopology
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
#align mem_nhds_subtype mem_nhds_subtype
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
#align nhds_subtype nhds_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
#align nhds_within_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 249 | 252 | theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by |
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.circle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f333194f5ecd1482191452c5ea60b37d4d6afa08"
/-!
# Maps on the unit circle
In this file we prove some basic lemmas about `expMapCircle` and the restriction of `Complex.arg`
to the unit circle. These two maps define a partial equivalence between `circle` and `ℝ`, see
`circle.argPartialEquiv` and `circle.argEquiv`, that sends the whole circle to `(-π, π]`.
-/
open Complex Function Set
open Real
namespace circle
theorem injective_arg : Injective fun z : circle => arg z := fun z w h =>
Subtype.ext <| ext_abs_arg ((abs_coe_circle z).trans (abs_coe_circle w).symm) h
#align circle.injective_arg circle.injective_arg
@[simp]
theorem arg_eq_arg {z w : circle} : arg z = arg w ↔ z = w :=
injective_arg.eq_iff
#align circle.arg_eq_arg circle.arg_eq_arg
end circle
theorem arg_expMapCircle {x : ℝ} (h₁ : -π < x) (h₂ : x ≤ π) : arg (expMapCircle x) = x := by
rw [expMapCircle_apply, exp_mul_I, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I ⟨h₁, h₂⟩]
#align arg_exp_map_circle arg_expMapCircle
@[simp]
theorem expMapCircle_arg (z : circle) : expMapCircle (arg z) = z :=
circle.injective_arg <| arg_expMapCircle (neg_pi_lt_arg _) (arg_le_pi _)
#align exp_map_circle_arg expMapCircle_arg
namespace circle
/-- `Complex.arg ∘ (↑)` and `expMapCircle` define a partial equivalence between `circle` and `ℝ`
with `source = Set.univ` and `target = Set.Ioc (-π) π`. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
noncomputable def argPartialEquiv : PartialEquiv circle ℝ where
toFun := arg ∘ (↑)
invFun := expMapCircle
source := univ
target := Ioc (-π) π
map_source' _ _ := ⟨neg_pi_lt_arg _, arg_le_pi _⟩
map_target' := mapsTo_univ _ _
left_inv' z _ := expMapCircle_arg z
right_inv' _ hx := arg_expMapCircle hx.1 hx.2
#align circle.arg_local_equiv circle.argPartialEquiv
/-- `Complex.arg` and `expMapCircle` define an equivalence between `circle` and `(-π, π]`. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
noncomputable def argEquiv : circle ≃ Ioc (-π) π where
toFun z := ⟨arg z, neg_pi_lt_arg _, arg_le_pi _⟩
invFun := expMapCircle ∘ (↑)
left_inv _ := argPartialEquiv.left_inv trivial
right_inv x := Subtype.ext <| argPartialEquiv.right_inv x.2
#align circle.arg_equiv circle.argEquiv
end circle
theorem leftInverse_expMapCircle_arg : LeftInverse expMapCircle (arg ∘ (↑)) :=
expMapCircle_arg
#align left_inverse_exp_map_circle_arg leftInverse_expMapCircle_arg
theorem invOn_arg_expMapCircle : InvOn (arg ∘ (↑)) expMapCircle (Ioc (-π) π) univ :=
circle.argPartialEquiv.symm.invOn
#align inv_on_arg_exp_map_circle invOn_arg_expMapCircle
theorem surjOn_expMapCircle_neg_pi_pi : SurjOn expMapCircle (Ioc (-π) π) univ :=
circle.argPartialEquiv.symm.surjOn
#align surj_on_exp_map_circle_neg_pi_pi surjOn_expMapCircle_neg_pi_pi
theorem expMapCircle_eq_expMapCircle {x y : ℝ} :
expMapCircle x = expMapCircle y ↔ ∃ m : ℤ, x = y + m * (2 * π) := by
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, expMapCircle_apply, expMapCircle_apply, exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int]
refine exists_congr fun n => ?_
rw [← mul_assoc, ← add_mul, mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero]
norm_cast
#align exp_map_circle_eq_exp_map_circle expMapCircle_eq_expMapCircle
theorem periodic_expMapCircle : Periodic expMapCircle (2 * π) := fun z =>
expMapCircle_eq_expMapCircle.2 ⟨1, by rw [Int.cast_one, one_mul]⟩
#align periodic_exp_map_circle periodic_expMapCircle
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-14
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma.
See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12229 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem expMapCircle_two_pi : expMapCircle (2 * π) = 1 :=
periodic_expMapCircle.eq.trans expMapCircle_zero
#align exp_map_circle_two_pi expMapCircle_two_pi
theorem expMapCircle_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : expMapCircle (x - 2 * π) = expMapCircle x :=
periodic_expMapCircle.sub_eq x
#align exp_map_circle_sub_two_pi expMapCircle_sub_two_pi
theorem expMapCircle_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : expMapCircle (x + 2 * π) = expMapCircle x :=
periodic_expMapCircle x
#align exp_map_circle_add_two_pi expMapCircle_add_two_pi
/-- `expMapCircle`, applied to a `Real.Angle`. -/
noncomputable def Real.Angle.expMapCircle (θ : Real.Angle) : circle :=
periodic_expMapCircle.lift θ
#align real.angle.exp_map_circle Real.Angle.expMapCircle
@[simp]
theorem Real.Angle.expMapCircle_coe (x : ℝ) : Real.Angle.expMapCircle x = _root_.expMapCircle x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.exp_map_circle_coe Real.Angle.expMapCircle_coe
theorem Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle (θ : Real.Angle) :
(θ.expMapCircle : ℂ) = θ.cos + θ.sin * I := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simp [Complex.exp_mul_I]
#align real.angle.coe_exp_map_circle Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle
@[simp]
theorem Real.Angle.expMapCircle_zero : Real.Angle.expMapCircle 0 = 1 := by
rw [← Real.Angle.coe_zero, Real.Angle.expMapCircle_coe, _root_.expMapCircle_zero]
#align real.angle.exp_map_circle_zero Real.Angle.expMapCircle_zero
@[simp]
theorem Real.Angle.expMapCircle_neg (θ : Real.Angle) :
Real.Angle.expMapCircle (-θ) = (Real.Angle.expMapCircle θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.coe_neg, Real.Angle.expMapCircle_coe, _root_.expMapCircle_neg]
#align real.angle.exp_map_circle_neg Real.Angle.expMapCircle_neg
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Circle.lean | 142 | 146 | theorem Real.Angle.expMapCircle_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : Real.Angle.expMapCircle (θ₁ + θ₂) =
Real.Angle.expMapCircle θ₁ * Real.Angle.expMapCircle θ₂ := by |
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact _root_.expMapCircle_add _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives
This file defines the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` where `𝕜` is a
normed field and `F` is a normed space over this field. The derivative of
such a function `f` at a point `x` is given by an element `f' : F`.
The theory is developed analogously to the [Fréchet
derivatives](./fderiv.html). We first introduce predicates defined in terms
of the corresponding predicates for Fréchet derivatives:
- `HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
- `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
- `HasDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x`.
- `HasStrictDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability, i.e.,
`f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o (y - z)` as `y, z → x`.
For the last two notions we also define a functional version:
- `derivWithin f s x` is a derivative of `f` at `x` within `s`. If the
derivative does not exist, then `derivWithin f s x` equals zero.
- `deriv f x` is a derivative of `f` at `x`. If the derivative does not
exist, then `deriv f x` equals zero.
The theorems `fderivWithin_derivWithin` and `fderiv_deriv` show that the
one-dimensional derivatives coincide with the general Fréchet derivatives.
We also show the existence and compute the derivatives of:
- constants
- the identity function
- linear maps (in `Linear.lean`)
- addition (in `Add.lean`)
- sum of finitely many functions (in `Add.lean`)
- negation (in `Add.lean`)
- subtraction (in `Add.lean`)
- star (in `Star.lean`)
- multiplication of two functions in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Mul.lean`)
- multiplication of a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` and of a function in `𝕜 → E` (in `Mul.lean`)
- powers of a function (in `Pow.lean` and `ZPow.lean`)
- inverse `x → x⁻¹` (in `Inv.lean`)
- division (in `Inv.lean`)
- composition of a function in `𝕜 → F` with a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Comp.lean`)
- composition of a function in `F → E` with a function in `𝕜 → F` (in `Comp.lean`)
- inverse function (assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `Inverse.lean`)
- polynomials (in `Polynomial.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
We set up the simplifier so that it can compute the derivative of simple functions. For instance,
```lean
example (x : ℝ) :
deriv (fun x ↦ cos (sin x) * exp x) x = (cos(sin(x))-sin(sin(x))*cos(x))*exp(x) := by
simp; ring
```
The relationship between the derivative of a function and its definition from a standard
undergraduate course as the limit of the slope `(f y - f x) / (y - x)` as `y` tends to `𝓝[≠] x`
is developed in the file `Slope.lean`.
## Implementation notes
Most of the theorems are direct restatements of the corresponding theorems
for Fréchet derivatives.
The strategy to construct simp lemmas that give the simplifier the possibility to compute
derivatives is the same as the one for differentiability statements, as explained in
`FDeriv/Basic.lean`. See the explanations there.
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges along the filter `L`.
-/
def HasDerivAtFilter (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) (L : Filter 𝕜) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x L
#align has_deriv_at_filter HasDerivAtFilter
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def HasDerivWithinAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
#align has_deriv_within_at HasDerivWithinAt
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def HasDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
#align has_deriv_at HasDerivAt
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability.
That is, `f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. -/
def HasStrictDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x
#align has_strict_deriv_at HasStrictDerivAt
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • derivWithin f s x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def derivWithin (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x 1
#align deriv_within derivWithin
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivAt f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv f x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def deriv (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderiv 𝕜 f x 1
#align deriv deriv
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L` in terms of `HasDerivAtFilter` -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L := by simp [HasDerivAtFilter]
#align has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_has_deriv_at_filter hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L → HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter.mp
#align has_fderiv_at_filter.has_deriv_at_filter HasFDerivAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_fderiv_within_at_iff_has_deriv_within_at hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt
/-- Expressing `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasFDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_has_fderiv_within_at hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt.mp
#align has_fderiv_within_at.has_deriv_within_at HasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt.mp
#align has_deriv_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at HasDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasDerivAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_fderiv_at_iff_has_deriv_at hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x → HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt.mp
#align has_fderiv_at.has_deriv_at HasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x := by
simp [HasStrictDerivAt, HasStrictFDerivAt]
#align has_strict_fderiv_at_iff_has_strict_deriv_at hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x → HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt.mp
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.has_strict_deriv_at HasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt :
HasStrictDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_strict_deriv_at_iff_has_strict_fderiv_at hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasStrictDerivAt.hasStrictFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt
#align has_strict_deriv_at.has_strict_fderiv_at HasStrictDerivAt.hasStrictFDerivAt
/-- Expressing `HasDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasFDerivAt` -/
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasDerivAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
#align has_deriv_at.has_fderiv_at HasDerivAt.hasFDerivAt
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h]
simp
#align deriv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_of_derivWithin_ne_zero (h : derivWithin f s x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
not_imp_comm.1 derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h
#align differentiable_within_at_of_deriv_within_ne_zero differentiableWithinAt_of_derivWithin_ne_zero
theorem deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : deriv f x = 0 := by
unfold deriv
rw [fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h]
simp
#align deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt
theorem differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h : deriv f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
not_imp_comm.1 deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h
#align differentiable_at_of_deriv_ne_zero differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq_deriv (s : Set 𝕜) (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h₁ : HasDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq H h h₁
#align unique_diff_within_at.eq_deriv UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq_deriv
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_at_filter_iff_is_o hasDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' : 𝕜 => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) L (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
(fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝[s] x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_is_o hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝 x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_at_iff_is_o hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_at_iff_tendsto hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_deriv_at_filter.is_O_sub HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hf' : f' ≠ 0) :
(fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
suffices AntilipschitzWith ‖f'‖₊⁻¹ (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') from hf.isBigO_sub_rev this
AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') fun x => by
simp [norm_smul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (mt norm_eq_zero.1 hf')]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_deriv_at_filter.is_O_sub_rev HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivAt f f' x :=
h.hasFDerivAt
#align has_strict_deriv_at.has_deriv_at HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set' {s t : Set 𝕜} (y : 𝕜) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' y h
#align has_deriv_within_at_congr_set' hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set'
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set {s t : Set 𝕜} (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
#align has_deriv_within_at_congr_set hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.congr_set, _⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
#align has_deriv_within_at.congr_set HasDerivWithinAt.congr_set
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {x}) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _
#align has_deriv_within_at_diff_singleton hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
#align has_deriv_within_at_Ioi_iff_Ici hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ici_of_Ioi HasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_of_Ici HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iio x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iic x) x := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
#align has_deriv_within_at_Iio_iff_Iic hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Iic_of_Iio, HasDerivWithinAt.Iio_of_Iic⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic
#align has_deriv_within_at.Iic_of_Iio HasDerivWithinAt.Iic_of_Iio
#align has_deriv_within_at.Iio_of_Iic HasDerivWithinAt.Iio_of_Iic
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo [LinearOrder 𝕜] [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] {x y : 𝕜} (h : x < y) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioo x y) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter <| Iio_mem_nhds h
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_iff_Ioo HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ioo, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioo_of_Ioi⟩ := HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_of_Ioo HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ioo
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioo_of_Ioi HasDerivWithinAt.Ioo_of_Ioi
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h => f (x + h) - f x - h • f') =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
#align has_deriv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.mono h hst
#align has_deriv_at_filter.mono HasDerivAtFilter.mono
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.mono HasDerivWithinAt.mono
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem h hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.mono_of_mem HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem
#align has_deriv_within_at.nhds_within HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem
theorem HasDerivAt.hasDerivAtFilter (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter h hL
#align has_deriv_at.has_deriv_at_filter HasDerivAt.hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_at.has_deriv_within_at HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_within_at.differentiable_within_at HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt h
#align has_deriv_at.differentiable_at HasDerivAt.differentiableAt
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_univ : HasDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
#align has_deriv_within_at_univ hasDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem HasDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| h₀.hasFDerivAt.unique h₁
#align has_deriv_at.unique HasDerivAt.unique
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' h
#align has_deriv_within_at_inter' hasDerivWithinAt_inter'
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter h
#align has_deriv_within_at_inter hasDerivWithinAt_inter
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (ht : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x :=
hs.hasFDerivWithinAt.union ht.hasFDerivWithinAt
#align has_deriv_within_at.union HasDerivWithinAt.union
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAt f f' x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt h hs
#align has_deriv_within_at.has_deriv_at HasDerivWithinAt.hasDerivAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f s x) s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt
#align differentiable_at.has_deriv_at DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_deriv_iff : HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableAt, fun h => h.hasDerivAt⟩
#align has_deriv_at_deriv_iff hasDerivAt_deriv_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_derivWithin_iff :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f s x) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableWithinAt, fun h => h.hasDerivWithinAt⟩
#align has_deriv_within_at_deriv_within_iff hasDerivWithinAt_derivWithin_iff
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasDerivAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasDerivAt
#align differentiable_on.has_deriv_at DifferentiableOn.hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.deriv (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : deriv f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasDerivAt.unique h
#align has_deriv_at.deriv HasDerivAt.deriv
theorem deriv_eq {f' : 𝕜 → F} (h : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) : deriv f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).deriv
#align deriv_eq deriv_eq
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : derivWithin f s x = f' :=
hxs.eq_deriv _ h.differentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within HasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin
theorem fderivWithin_derivWithin : (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = derivWithin f s x :=
rfl
#align fderiv_within_deriv_within fderivWithin_derivWithin
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic.lean | 470 | 471 | theorem derivWithin_fderivWithin :
smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (derivWithin f s x) = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by | simp [derivWithin]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
#align_import data.fintype.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d78597269638367c3863d40d45108f52207e03cf"
/-!
# Finite types
This file defines a typeclass to state that a type is finite.
## Main declarations
* `Fintype α`: Typeclass saying that a type is finite. It takes as fields a `Finset` and a proof
that all terms of type `α` are in it.
* `Finset.univ`: The finset of all elements of a fintype.
See `Data.Fintype.Card` for the cardinality of a fintype,
the equivalence with `Fin (Fintype.card α)`, and pigeonhole principles.
## Instances
Instances for `Fintype` for
* `{x // p x}` are in this file as `Fintype.subtype`
* `Option α` are in `Data.Fintype.Option`
* `α × β` are in `Data.Fintype.Prod`
* `α ⊕ β` are in `Data.Fintype.Sum`
* `Σ (a : α), β a` are in `Data.Fintype.Sigma`
These files also contain appropriate `Infinite` instances for these types.
`Infinite` instances for `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `Multiset α`, and `List α` are in `Data.Fintype.Lattice`.
Types which have a surjection from/an injection to a `Fintype` are themselves fintypes.
See `Fintype.ofInjective` and `Fintype.ofSurjective`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- `Fintype α` means that `α` is finite, i.e. there are only
finitely many distinct elements of type `α`. The evidence of this
is a finset `elems` (a list up to permutation without duplicates),
together with a proof that everything of type `α` is in the list. -/
class Fintype (α : Type*) where
/-- The `Finset` containing all elements of a `Fintype` -/
elems : Finset α
/-- A proof that `elems` contains every element of the type -/
complete : ∀ x : α, x ∈ elems
#align fintype Fintype
namespace Finset
variable [Fintype α] {s t : Finset α}
/-- `univ` is the universal finite set of type `Finset α` implied from
the assumption `Fintype α`. -/
def univ : Finset α :=
@Fintype.elems α _
#align finset.univ Finset.univ
@[simp]
theorem mem_univ (x : α) : x ∈ (univ : Finset α) :=
Fintype.complete x
#align finset.mem_univ Finset.mem_univ
-- Porting note: removing @[simp], simp can prove it
theorem mem_univ_val : ∀ x, x ∈ (univ : Finset α).1 :=
mem_univ
#align finset.mem_univ_val Finset.mem_univ_val
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s := by simp [ext_iff]
#align finset.eq_univ_iff_forall Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall
theorem eq_univ_of_forall : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
#align finset.eq_univ_of_forall Finset.eq_univ_of_forall
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_univ : ↑(univ : Finset α) = (Set.univ : Set α) := by ext; simp
#align finset.coe_univ Finset.coe_univ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ : (s : Set α) = Set.univ ↔ s = univ := by rw [← coe_univ, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_univ Finset.coe_eq_univ
theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact eq_univ_of_forall fun y => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim y x]
#align finset.nonempty.eq_univ Finset.Nonempty.eq_univ
theorem univ_nonempty_iff : (univ : Finset α).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty α := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_univ, Set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
#align finset.univ_nonempty_iff Finset.univ_nonempty_iff
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem univ_nonempty [Nonempty α] : (univ : Finset α).Nonempty :=
univ_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›
#align finset.univ_nonempty Finset.univ_nonempty
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Finset α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← univ_nonempty_iff, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
#align finset.univ_eq_empty_iff Finset.univ_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty [IsEmpty α] : (univ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
univ_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
#align finset.univ_eq_empty Finset.univ_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem univ_unique [Unique α] : (univ : Finset α) = {default} :=
Finset.ext fun x => iff_of_true (mem_univ _) <| mem_singleton.2 <| Subsingleton.elim x default
#align finset.univ_unique Finset.univ_unique
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ univ := fun a _ => mem_univ a
#align finset.subset_univ Finset.subset_univ
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder (Finset α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (Finset α)) with
top := univ
le_top := subset_univ }
#align finset.bounded_order Finset.boundedOrder
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Finset α) = univ :=
rfl
#align finset.top_eq_univ Finset.top_eq_univ
theorem ssubset_univ_iff {s : Finset α} : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ :=
@lt_top_iff_ne_top _ _ _ s
#align finset.ssubset_univ_iff Finset.ssubset_univ_iff
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Finset α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
theorem codisjoint_left : Codisjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∉ s → a ∈ t := by
classical simp [codisjoint_iff, eq_univ_iff_forall, or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align finset.codisjoint_left Finset.codisjoint_left
theorem codisjoint_right : Codisjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∉ t → a ∈ s :=
Codisjoint_comm.trans codisjoint_left
#align finset.codisjoint_right Finset.codisjoint_right
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [DecidableEq α] {a : α}
instance booleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra (Finset α) :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBooleanAlgebra
#align finset.boolean_algebra Finset.booleanAlgebra
theorem sdiff_eq_inter_compl (s t : Finset α) : s \ t = s ∩ tᶜ :=
sdiff_eq
#align finset.sdiff_eq_inter_compl Finset.sdiff_eq_inter_compl
theorem compl_eq_univ_sdiff (s : Finset α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
rfl
#align finset.compl_eq_univ_sdiff Finset.compl_eq_univ_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem mem_compl : a ∈ sᶜ ↔ a ∉ s := by simp [compl_eq_univ_sdiff]
#align finset.mem_compl Finset.mem_compl
theorem not_mem_compl : a ∉ sᶜ ↔ a ∈ s := by rw [mem_compl, not_not]
#align finset.not_mem_compl Finset.not_mem_compl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_compl (s : Finset α) : ↑sᶜ = (↑s : Set α)ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_compl
#align finset.coe_compl Finset.coe_compl
@[simp] lemma compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s := @compl_le_compl_iff_le (Finset α) _ _ _
@[simp] lemma compl_ssubset_compl : sᶜ ⊂ tᶜ ↔ t ⊂ s := @compl_lt_compl_iff_lt (Finset α) _ _ _
lemma subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ := le_compl_iff_le_compl (α := Finset α)
@[simp] lemma subset_compl_singleton : s ⊆ {a}ᶜ ↔ a ∉ s := by
rw [subset_compl_comm, singleton_subset_iff, mem_compl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty : (∅ : Finset α)ᶜ = univ :=
compl_bot
#align finset.compl_empty Finset.compl_empty
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ : (univ : Finset α)ᶜ = ∅ :=
compl_top
#align finset.compl_univ Finset.compl_univ
@[simp]
theorem compl_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ :=
compl_eq_bot
#align finset.compl_eq_empty_iff Finset.compl_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_eq_univ_iff (s : Finset α) : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
compl_eq_top
#align finset.compl_eq_univ_iff Finset.compl_eq_univ_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_compl (s : Finset α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ :=
sup_compl_eq_top
#align finset.union_compl Finset.union_compl
@[simp]
theorem inter_compl (s : Finset α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ :=
inf_compl_eq_bot
#align finset.inter_compl Finset.inter_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ :=
compl_sup
#align finset.compl_union Finset.compl_union
@[simp]
theorem compl_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ :=
compl_inf
#align finset.compl_inter Finset.compl_inter
@[simp]
theorem compl_erase : (s.erase a)ᶜ = insert a sᶜ := by
ext
simp only [or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_insert, not_and, mem_compl, mem_erase]
#align finset.compl_erase Finset.compl_erase
@[simp]
theorem compl_insert : (insert a s)ᶜ = sᶜ.erase a := by
ext
simp only [not_or, mem_insert, iff_self_iff, mem_compl, mem_erase]
#align finset.compl_insert Finset.compl_insert
theorem insert_compl_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a (insert a s)ᶜ = sᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_insert, insert_erase (mem_compl.2 ha)]
@[simp]
theorem insert_compl_self (x : α) : insert x ({x}ᶜ : Finset α) = univ := by
rw [← compl_erase, erase_singleton, compl_empty]
#align finset.insert_compl_self Finset.insert_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable ¬p x] :
(univ.filter p)ᶜ = univ.filter fun x => ¬p x :=
ext <| by simp
#align finset.compl_filter Finset.compl_filter
theorem compl_ne_univ_iff_nonempty (s : Finset α) : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, Finset.Nonempty]
#align finset.compl_ne_univ_iff_nonempty Finset.compl_ne_univ_iff_nonempty
theorem compl_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α)ᶜ = univ.erase a := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_sdiff, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
#align finset.compl_singleton Finset.compl_singleton
theorem insert_inj_on' (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn (fun a => insert a s) (sᶜ : Finset α) := by
rw [coe_compl]
exact s.insert_inj_on
#align finset.insert_inj_on' Finset.insert_inj_on'
theorem image_univ_of_surjective [Fintype β] {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) :
univ.image f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| hf.forall.2 fun _ => mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_univ _
#align finset.image_univ_of_surjective Finset.image_univ_of_surjective
@[simp]
theorem image_univ_equiv [Fintype β] (f : β ≃ α) : univ.image f = univ :=
Finset.image_univ_of_surjective f.surjective
@[simp] lemma univ_inter (s : Finset α) : univ ∩ s = s := by ext a; simp
#align finset.univ_inter Finset.univ_inter
@[simp] lemma inter_univ (s : Finset α) : s ∩ univ = s := by rw [inter_comm, univ_inter]
#align finset.inter_univ Finset.inter_univ
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_univ : s ∩ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := inf_eq_top_iff
end BooleanAlgebra
-- @[simp] --Note this would loop with `Finset.univ_unique`
lemma singleton_eq_univ [Subsingleton α] (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α) = univ := by
ext b; simp [Subsingleton.elim a b]
theorem map_univ_of_surjective [Fintype β] {f : β ↪ α} (hf : Surjective f) : univ.map f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| hf.forall.2 fun _ => mem_map_of_mem _ <| mem_univ _
#align finset.map_univ_of_surjective Finset.map_univ_of_surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_univ_equiv [Fintype β] (f : β ≃ α) : univ.map f.toEmbedding = univ :=
map_univ_of_surjective f.surjective
#align finset.map_univ_equiv Finset.map_univ_equiv
theorem univ_map_equiv_to_embedding {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (e : α ≃ β) :
univ.map e.toEmbedding = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun b => mem_map.mpr ⟨e.symm b, mem_univ _, by simp⟩
#align finset.univ_map_equiv_to_embedding Finset.univ_map_equiv_to_embedding
@[simp]
theorem univ_filter_exists (f : α → β) [Fintype β] [DecidablePred fun y => ∃ x, f x = y]
[DecidableEq β] : (Finset.univ.filter fun y => ∃ x, f x = y) = Finset.univ.image f := by
ext
simp
#align finset.univ_filter_exists Finset.univ_filter_exists
/-- Note this is a special case of `(Finset.image_preimage f univ _).symm`. -/
theorem univ_filter_mem_range (f : α → β) [Fintype β] [DecidablePred fun y => y ∈ Set.range f]
[DecidableEq β] : (Finset.univ.filter fun y => y ∈ Set.range f) = Finset.univ.image f := by
letI : DecidablePred (fun y => ∃ x, f x = y) := by simpa using ‹_›
exact univ_filter_exists f
#align finset.univ_filter_mem_range Finset.univ_filter_mem_range
theorem coe_filter_univ (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(univ.filter p : Set α) = { x | p x } := by simp
#align finset.coe_filter_univ Finset.coe_filter_univ
@[simp] lemma subtype_eq_univ {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [Fintype {a // p a}] :
s.subtype p = univ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, p a → a ∈ s := by simp [ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma subtype_univ [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [Fintype {a // p a}] :
univ.subtype p = univ := by simp
end Finset
open Finset Function
namespace Fintype
instance decidablePiFintype {α} {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)] [Fintype α] :
DecidableEq (∀ a, β a) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ @Fintype.elems α _, f a = g a)
(by simp [Function.funext_iff, Fintype.complete])
#align fintype.decidable_pi_fintype Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance decidableForallFintype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [Fintype α] :
Decidable (∀ a, p a) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ @univ α _, p a) (by simp)
#align fintype.decidable_forall_fintype Fintype.decidableForallFintype
instance decidableExistsFintype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [Fintype α] :
Decidable (∃ a, p a) :=
decidable_of_iff (∃ a ∈ @univ α _, p a) (by simp)
#align fintype.decidable_exists_fintype Fintype.decidableExistsFintype
instance decidableMemRangeFintype [Fintype α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) :
DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f) := fun _ => Fintype.decidableExistsFintype
#align fintype.decidable_mem_range_fintype Fintype.decidableMemRangeFintype
instance decidableSubsingleton [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Decidable s.Subsingleton := decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a = b) Iff.rfl
section BundledHoms
instance decidableEqEquivFintype [DecidableEq β] [Fintype α] : DecidableEq (α ≃ β) := fun a b =>
decidable_of_iff (a.1 = b.1) Equiv.coe_fn_injective.eq_iff
#align fintype.decidable_eq_equiv_fintype Fintype.decidableEqEquivFintype
instance decidableEqEmbeddingFintype [DecidableEq β] [Fintype α] : DecidableEq (α ↪ β) := fun a b =>
decidable_of_iff ((a : α → β) = b) Function.Embedding.coe_injective.eq_iff
#align fintype.decidable_eq_embedding_fintype Fintype.decidableEqEmbeddingFintype
end BundledHoms
instance decidableInjectiveFintype [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] [Fintype α] :
DecidablePred (Injective : (α → β) → Prop) := fun x => by unfold Injective; infer_instance
#align fintype.decidable_injective_fintype Fintype.decidableInjectiveFintype
instance decidableSurjectiveFintype [DecidableEq β] [Fintype α] [Fintype β] :
DecidablePred (Surjective : (α → β) → Prop) := fun x => by unfold Surjective; infer_instance
#align fintype.decidable_surjective_fintype Fintype.decidableSurjectiveFintype
instance decidableBijectiveFintype [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] [Fintype α] [Fintype β] :
DecidablePred (Bijective : (α → β) → Prop) := fun x => by unfold Bijective; infer_instance
#align fintype.decidable_bijective_fintype Fintype.decidableBijectiveFintype
instance decidableRightInverseFintype [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :
Decidable (Function.RightInverse f g) :=
show Decidable (∀ x, g (f x) = x) by infer_instance
#align fintype.decidable_right_inverse_fintype Fintype.decidableRightInverseFintype
instance decidableLeftInverseFintype [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :
Decidable (Function.LeftInverse f g) :=
show Decidable (∀ x, f (g x) = x) by infer_instance
#align fintype.decidable_left_inverse_fintype Fintype.decidableLeftInverseFintype
/-- Construct a proof of `Fintype α` from a universal multiset -/
def ofMultiset [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s) : Fintype α :=
⟨s.toFinset, by simpa using H⟩
#align fintype.of_multiset Fintype.ofMultiset
/-- Construct a proof of `Fintype α` from a universal list -/
def ofList [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ l) : Fintype α :=
⟨l.toFinset, by simpa using H⟩
#align fintype.of_list Fintype.ofList
instance subsingleton (α : Type*) : Subsingleton (Fintype α) :=
⟨fun ⟨s₁, h₁⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂⟩ => by congr; simp [Finset.ext_iff, h₁, h₂]⟩
#align fintype.subsingleton Fintype.subsingleton
instance (α : Type*) : Lean.Meta.FastSubsingleton (Fintype α) := {}
/-- Given a predicate that can be represented by a finset, the subtype
associated to the predicate is a fintype. -/
protected def subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x) :
Fintype { x // p x } :=
⟨⟨s.1.pmap Subtype.mk fun x => (H x).1, s.nodup.pmap fun _ _ _ _ => congr_arg Subtype.val⟩,
fun ⟨x, px⟩ => Multiset.mem_pmap.2 ⟨x, (H x).2 px, rfl⟩⟩
#align fintype.subtype Fintype.subtype
/-- Construct a fintype from a finset with the same elements. -/
def ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) : Fintype p :=
Fintype.subtype s H
#align fintype.of_finset Fintype.ofFinset
/-- If `f : α → β` is a bijection and `α` is a fintype, then `β` is also a fintype. -/
def ofBijective [Fintype α] (f : α → β) (H : Function.Bijective f) : Fintype β :=
⟨univ.map ⟨f, H.1⟩, fun b =>
let ⟨_, e⟩ := H.2 b
e ▸ mem_map_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)⟩
#align fintype.of_bijective Fintype.ofBijective
/-- If `f : α → β` is a surjection and `α` is a fintype, then `β` is also a fintype. -/
def ofSurjective [DecidableEq β] [Fintype α] (f : α → β) (H : Function.Surjective f) : Fintype β :=
⟨univ.image f, fun b =>
let ⟨_, e⟩ := H b
e ▸ mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)⟩
#align fintype.of_surjective Fintype.ofSurjective
end Fintype
namespace Finset
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
@[simp]
lemma filter_univ_mem (s : Finset α) : univ.filter (· ∈ s) = s := by simp [filter_mem_eq_inter]
instance decidableCodisjoint : Decidable (Codisjoint s t) :=
decidable_of_iff _ codisjoint_left.symm
#align finset.decidable_codisjoint Finset.decidableCodisjoint
instance decidableIsCompl : Decidable (IsCompl s t) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ isCompl_iff
#align finset.decidable_is_compl Finset.decidableIsCompl
end Finset
section Inv
namespace Function
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq β]
namespace Injective
variable {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f)
/-- The inverse of an `hf : injective` function `f : α → β`, of the type `↥(Set.range f) → α`.
This is the computable version of `Function.invFun` that requires `Fintype α` and `DecidableEq β`,
or the function version of applying `(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm`.
This function should not usually be used for actual computation because for most cases,
an explicit inverse can be stated that has better computational properties.
This function computes by checking all terms `a : α` to find the `f a = b`, so it is O(N) where
`N = Fintype.card α`.
-/
def invOfMemRange : Set.range f → α := fun b =>
Finset.choose (fun a => f a = b) Finset.univ
((exists_unique_congr (by simp)).mp (hf.exists_unique_of_mem_range b.property))
#align function.injective.inv_of_mem_range Function.Injective.invOfMemRange
theorem left_inv_of_invOfMemRange (b : Set.range f) : f (hf.invOfMemRange b) = b :=
(Finset.choose_spec (fun a => f a = b) _ _).right
#align function.injective.left_inv_of_inv_of_mem_range Function.Injective.left_inv_of_invOfMemRange
@[simp]
theorem right_inv_of_invOfMemRange (a : α) : hf.invOfMemRange ⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩ = a :=
hf (Finset.choose_spec (fun a' => f a' = f a) _ _).right
#align function.injective.right_inv_of_inv_of_mem_range Function.Injective.right_inv_of_invOfMemRange
theorem invFun_restrict [Nonempty α] : (Set.range f).restrict (invFun f) = hf.invOfMemRange := by
ext ⟨b, h⟩
apply hf
simp [hf.left_inv_of_invOfMemRange, @invFun_eq _ _ _ f b (Set.mem_range.mp h)]
#align function.injective.inv_fun_restrict Function.Injective.invFun_restrict
theorem invOfMemRange_surjective : Function.Surjective hf.invOfMemRange := fun a =>
⟨⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩, by simp⟩
#align function.injective.inv_of_mem_range_surjective Function.Injective.invOfMemRange_surjective
end Injective
namespace Embedding
variable (f : α ↪ β) (b : Set.range f)
/-- The inverse of an embedding `f : α ↪ β`, of the type `↥(Set.range f) → α`.
This is the computable version of `Function.invFun` that requires `Fintype α` and `DecidableEq β`,
or the function version of applying `(Equiv.ofInjective f f.injective).symm`.
This function should not usually be used for actual computation because for most cases,
an explicit inverse can be stated that has better computational properties.
This function computes by checking all terms `a : α` to find the `f a = b`, so it is O(N) where
`N = Fintype.card α`.
-/
def invOfMemRange : α :=
f.injective.invOfMemRange b
#align function.embedding.inv_of_mem_range Function.Embedding.invOfMemRange
@[simp]
theorem left_inv_of_invOfMemRange : f (f.invOfMemRange b) = b :=
f.injective.left_inv_of_invOfMemRange b
#align function.embedding.left_inv_of_inv_of_mem_range Function.Embedding.left_inv_of_invOfMemRange
@[simp]
theorem right_inv_of_invOfMemRange (a : α) : f.invOfMemRange ⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩ = a :=
f.injective.right_inv_of_invOfMemRange a
#align function.embedding.right_inv_of_inv_of_mem_range Function.Embedding.right_inv_of_invOfMemRange
theorem invFun_restrict [Nonempty α] : (Set.range f).restrict (invFun f) = f.invOfMemRange := by
ext ⟨b, h⟩
apply f.injective
simp [f.left_inv_of_invOfMemRange, @invFun_eq _ _ _ f b (Set.mem_range.mp h)]
#align function.embedding.inv_fun_restrict Function.Embedding.invFun_restrict
theorem invOfMemRange_surjective : Function.Surjective f.invOfMemRange := fun a =>
⟨⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩, by simp⟩
#align function.embedding.inv_of_mem_range_surjective Function.Embedding.invOfMemRange_surjective
end Embedding
end Function
end Inv
namespace Fintype
/-- Given an injective function to a fintype, the domain is also a
fintype. This is noncomputable because injectivity alone cannot be
used to construct preimages. -/
noncomputable def ofInjective [Fintype β] (f : α → β) (H : Function.Injective f) : Fintype α :=
letI := Classical.dec
if hα : Nonempty α then
letI := Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty hα
ofSurjective (invFun f) (invFun_surjective H)
else ⟨∅, fun x => (hα ⟨x⟩).elim⟩
#align fintype.of_injective Fintype.ofInjective
/-- If `f : α ≃ β` and `α` is a fintype, then `β` is also a fintype. -/
def ofEquiv (α : Type*) [Fintype α] (f : α ≃ β) : Fintype β :=
ofBijective _ f.bijective
#align fintype.of_equiv Fintype.ofEquiv
/-- Any subsingleton type with a witness is a fintype (with one term). -/
def ofSubsingleton (a : α) [Subsingleton α] : Fintype α :=
⟨{a}, fun _ => Finset.mem_singleton.2 (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
#align fintype.of_subsingleton Fintype.ofSubsingleton
@[simp]
theorem univ_ofSubsingleton (a : α) [Subsingleton α] : @univ _ (ofSubsingleton a) = {a} :=
rfl
#align fintype.univ_of_subsingleton Fintype.univ_ofSubsingleton
/-- An empty type is a fintype. Not registered as an instance, to make sure that there aren't two
conflicting `Fintype ι` instances around when casing over whether a fintype `ι` is empty or not. -/
def ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Fintype α :=
⟨∅, isEmptyElim⟩
#align fintype.of_is_empty Fintype.ofIsEmpty
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofIsEmpty`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use `Finset.univ_eq_empty`. -/
theorem univ_ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : @univ α Fintype.ofIsEmpty = ∅ :=
rfl
#align fintype.univ_of_is_empty Fintype.univ_ofIsEmpty
instance : Fintype Empty := Fintype.ofIsEmpty
instance : Fintype PEmpty := Fintype.ofIsEmpty
end Fintype
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α}
/-- Construct a finset enumerating a set `s`, given a `Fintype` instance. -/
def toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Finset α :=
(@Finset.univ s _).map <| Function.Embedding.subtype _
#align set.to_finset Set.toFinset
@[congr]
theorem toFinset_congr {s t : Set α} [Fintype s] [Fintype t] (h : s = t) :
toFinset s = toFinset t := by subst h; congr; exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align set.to_finset_congr Set.toFinset_congr
@[simp]
theorem mem_toFinset {s : Set α} [Fintype s] {a : α} : a ∈ s.toFinset ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp [toFinset]
#align set.mem_to_finset Set.mem_toFinset
/-- Many `Fintype` instances for sets are defined using an extensionally equal `Finset`.
Rewriting `s.toFinset` with `Set.toFinset_ofFinset` replaces the term with such a `Finset`. -/
theorem toFinset_ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) :
@Set.toFinset _ p (Fintype.ofFinset s H) = s :=
Finset.ext fun x => by rw [@mem_toFinset _ _ (id _), H]
#align set.to_finset_of_finset Set.toFinset_ofFinset
/-- Membership of a set with a `Fintype` instance is decidable.
Using this as an instance leads to potential loops with `Subtype.fintype` under certain decidability
assumptions, so it should only be declared a local instance. -/
def decidableMemOfFintype [DecidableEq α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (a) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
decidable_of_iff _ mem_toFinset
#align set.decidable_mem_of_fintype Set.decidableMemOfFintype
@[simp]
theorem coe_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : (↑s.toFinset : Set α) = s :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_toFinset
#align set.coe_to_finset Set.coe_toFinset
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem toFinset_nonempty {s : Set α} [Fintype s] : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Finset.coe_nonempty, coe_toFinset]
#align set.to_finset_nonempty Set.toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inj {s t : Set α} [Fintype s] [Fintype t] : s.toFinset = t.toFinset ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← s.coe_toFinset, h, t.coe_toFinset], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align set.to_finset_inj Set.toFinset_inj
@[mono]
theorem toFinset_subset_toFinset [Fintype s] [Fintype t] : s.toFinset ⊆ t.toFinset ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp [Finset.subset_iff, Set.subset_def]
#align set.to_finset_subset_to_finset Set.toFinset_subset_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_ssubset [Fintype s] {t : Finset α} : s.toFinset ⊂ t ↔ s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, coe_toFinset]
#align set.to_finset_ssubset Set.toFinset_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem subset_toFinset {s : Finset α} [Fintype t] : s ⊆ t.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, coe_toFinset]
#align set.subset_to_finset Set.subset_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_toFinset {s : Finset α} [Fintype t] : s ⊂ t.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, coe_toFinset]
#align set.ssubset_to_finset Set.ssubset_toFinset
@[mono]
theorem toFinset_ssubset_toFinset [Fintype s] [Fintype t] : s.toFinset ⊂ t.toFinset ↔ s ⊂ t := by
simp only [Finset.ssubset_def, toFinset_subset_toFinset, ssubset_def]
#align set.to_finset_ssubset_to_finset Set.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_subset [Fintype s] {t : Finset α} : s.toFinset ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, coe_toFinset]
#align set.to_finset_subset Set.toFinset_subset
alias ⟨_, toFinset_mono⟩ := toFinset_subset_toFinset
#align set.to_finset_mono Set.toFinset_mono
alias ⟨_, toFinset_strict_mono⟩ := toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
#align set.to_finset_strict_mono Set.toFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_toFinset [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Disjoint s.toFinset t.toFinset ↔ Disjoint s t := by simp only [← disjoint_coe, coe_toFinset]
#align set.disjoint_to_finset Set.disjoint_toFinset
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α] (s t) [Fintype s] [Fintype t]
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter [Fintype (s ∩ t : Set _)] : (s ∩ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∩ t.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_inter Set.toFinset_inter
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union [Fintype (s ∪ t : Set _)] : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_union Set.toFinset_union
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_diff [Fintype (s \ t : Set _)] : (s \ t).toFinset = s.toFinset \ t.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_diff Set.toFinset_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_symmDiff [Fintype (s ∆ t : Set _)] :
(s ∆ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∆ t.toFinset := by
ext
simp [mem_symmDiff, Finset.mem_symmDiff]
#align set.to_finset_symm_diff Set.toFinset_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_compl [Fintype α] [Fintype (sᶜ : Set _)] : sᶜ.toFinset = s.toFinsetᶜ := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_compl Set.toFinset_compl
end DecidableEq
-- TODO The `↥` circumvents an elaboration bug. See comment on `Set.toFinset_univ`.
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_empty [Fintype (∅ : Set α)] : (∅ : Set α).toFinset = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_empty Set.toFinset_empty
/- TODO Without the coercion arrow (`↥`) there is an elaboration bug in the following two;
it essentially infers `Fintype.{v} (Set.univ.{u} : Set α)` with `v` and `u` distinct.
Reported in leanprover-community/lean#672 -/
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_univ [Fintype α] [Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)] :
(Set.univ : Set α).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_univ Set.toFinset_univ
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty [Fintype s] : s.toFinset = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
let A : Fintype (∅ : Set α) := Fintype.ofIsEmpty
rw [← toFinset_empty, toFinset_inj]
#align set.to_finset_eq_empty Set.toFinset_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_univ [Fintype α] [Fintype s] : s.toFinset = Finset.univ ↔ s = univ := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_toFinset, coe_univ]
#align set.to_finset_eq_univ Set.toFinset_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_setOf [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [Fintype { x | p x }] :
{ x | p x }.toFinset = Finset.univ.filter p := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_set_of Set.toFinset_setOf
--@[simp] Porting note: removing simp, simp can prove it
theorem toFinset_ssubset_univ [Fintype α] {s : Set α} [Fintype s] :
s.toFinset ⊂ Finset.univ ↔ s ⊂ univ := by rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_toFinset, coe_univ]
#align set.to_finset_ssubset_univ Set.toFinset_ssubset_univ
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_image [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype (f '' s)] :
(f '' s).toFinset = s.toFinset.image f :=
Finset.coe_injective <| by simp
#align set.to_finset_image Set.toFinset_image
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_range [DecidableEq α] [Fintype β] (f : β → α) [Fintype (Set.range f)] :
(Set.range f).toFinset = Finset.univ.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_range Set.toFinset_range
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attribute
theorem toFinset_singleton (a : α) [Fintype ({a} : Set α)] : ({a} : Set α).toFinset = {a} := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_singleton Set.toFinset_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_insert [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Set α} [Fintype (insert a s : Set α)]
[Fintype s] : (insert a s).toFinset = insert a s.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.to_finset_insert Set.toFinset_insert
theorem filter_mem_univ_eq_toFinset [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Finset.univ.filter (· ∈ s) = s.toFinset := by
ext
simp only [Finset.mem_univ, decide_eq_true_eq, forall_true_left, mem_filter,
true_and, mem_toFinset]
#align set.filter_mem_univ_eq_to_finset Set.filter_mem_univ_eq_toFinset
end Set
@[simp]
theorem Finset.toFinset_coe (s : Finset α) [Fintype (s : Set α)] : (s : Set α).toFinset = s :=
ext fun _ => Set.mem_toFinset
#align finset.to_finset_coe Finset.toFinset_coe
instance Fin.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Fin n) :=
⟨⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩, List.mem_finRange⟩
theorem Fin.univ_def (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)) = ⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩ :=
rfl
#align fin.univ_def Fin.univ_def
@[simp] theorem List.toFinset_finRange (n : ℕ) : (List.finRange n).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
ext; simp
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_val_map {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.val.map f = List.ofFn f := by
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, univ_def]
theorem Fin.univ_image_def {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.image f = (List.ofFn f).toFinset := by
simp [Finset.image]
theorem Fin.univ_map_def {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n ↪ α) :
Finset.univ.map f = ⟨List.ofFn f, List.nodup_ofFn.mpr f.injective⟩ := by
simp [Finset.map]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succAbove_univ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : univ.image i.succAbove = {i}ᶜ := by
ext m
simp
#align fin.image_succ_above_univ Fin.image_succAbove_univ
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Basic.lean | 828 | 829 | theorem Fin.image_succ_univ (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.succ = {0}ᶜ := by |
rw [← Fin.succAbove_zero, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.affine_subspace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e96bdfbd1e8c98a09ff75f7ac6204d142debc840"
/-!
# Affine spaces
This file defines affine subspaces (over modules) and the affine span of a set of points.
## Main definitions
* `AffineSubspace k P` is the type of affine subspaces. Unlike affine spaces, affine subspaces are
allowed to be empty, and lemmas that do not apply to empty affine subspaces have `Nonempty`
hypotheses. There is a `CompleteLattice` structure on affine subspaces.
* `AffineSubspace.direction` gives the `Submodule` spanned by the pairwise differences of points
in an `AffineSubspace`. There are various lemmas relating to the set of vectors in the
`direction`, and relating the lattice structure on affine subspaces to that on their directions.
* `AffineSubspace.parallel`, notation `∥`, gives the property of two affine subspaces being
parallel (one being a translate of the other).
* `affineSpan` gives the affine subspace spanned by a set of points, with `vectorSpan` giving its
direction. The `affineSpan` is defined in terms of `spanPoints`, which gives an explicit
description of the points contained in the affine span; `spanPoints` itself should generally only
be used when that description is required, with `affineSpan` being the main definition for other
purposes. Two other descriptions of the affine span are proved equivalent: it is the `sInf` of
affine subspaces containing the points, and (if `[Nontrivial k]`) it contains exactly those points
that are affine combinations of points in the given set.
## Implementation notes
`outParam` is used in the definition of `AddTorsor V P` to make `V` an implicit argument (deduced
from `P`) in most cases. As for modules, `k` is an explicit argument rather than implied by `P` or
`V`.
This file only provides purely algebraic definitions and results. Those depending on analysis or
topology are defined elsewhere; see `Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor` and `Topology.Algebra.Affine`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
open Set
section
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P]
/-- The submodule spanning the differences of a (possibly empty) set of points. -/
def vectorSpan (s : Set P) : Submodule k V :=
Submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s)
#align vector_span vectorSpan
/-- The definition of `vectorSpan`, for rewriting. -/
theorem vectorSpan_def (s : Set P) : vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s) :=
rfl
#align vector_span_def vectorSpan_def
/-- `vectorSpan` is monotone. -/
theorem vectorSpan_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : vectorSpan k s₁ ≤ vectorSpan k s₂ :=
Submodule.span_mono (vsub_self_mono h)
#align vector_span_mono vectorSpan_mono
variable (P)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem vectorSpan_empty : vectorSpan k (∅ : Set P) = (⊥ : Submodule k V) := by
rw [vectorSpan_def, vsub_empty, Submodule.span_empty]
#align vector_span_empty vectorSpan_empty
variable {P}
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a single point is `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem vectorSpan_singleton (p : P) : vectorSpan k ({p} : Set P) = ⊥ := by simp [vectorSpan_def]
#align vector_span_singleton vectorSpan_singleton
/-- The `s -ᵥ s` lies within the `vectorSpan k s`. -/
theorem vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan (s : Set P) : s -ᵥ s ⊆ ↑(vectorSpan k s) :=
Submodule.subset_span
#align vsub_set_subset_vector_span vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan
/-- Each pairwise difference is in the `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem vsub_mem_vectorSpan {s : Set P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vectorSpan k s :=
vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan k s (vsub_mem_vsub hp1 hp2)
#align vsub_mem_vector_span vsub_mem_vectorSpan
/-- The points in the affine span of a (possibly empty) set of points. Use `affineSpan` instead to
get an `AffineSubspace k P`. -/
def spanPoints (s : Set P) : Set P :=
{ p | ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ v ∈ vectorSpan k s, p = v +ᵥ p1 }
#align span_points spanPoints
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
theorem mem_spanPoints (p : P) (s : Set P) : p ∈ s → p ∈ spanPoints k s
| hp => ⟨p, hp, 0, Submodule.zero_mem _, (zero_vadd V p).symm⟩
#align mem_span_points mem_spanPoints
/-- A set is contained in its `spanPoints`. -/
theorem subset_spanPoints (s : Set P) : s ⊆ spanPoints k s := fun p => mem_spanPoints k p s
#align subset_span_points subset_spanPoints
/-- The `spanPoints` of a set is nonempty if and only if that set is. -/
@[simp]
theorem spanPoints_nonempty (s : Set P) : (spanPoints k s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
constructor
· contrapose
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
intro h
simp [h, spanPoints]
· exact fun h => h.mono (subset_spanPoints _ _)
#align span_points_nonempty spanPoints_nonempty
/-- Adding a point in the affine span and a vector in the spanning submodule produces a point in the
affine span. -/
theorem vadd_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_vectorSpan {s : Set P} {p : P} {v : V}
(hp : p ∈ spanPoints k s) (hv : v ∈ vectorSpan k s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ spanPoints k s := by
rcases hp with ⟨p2, ⟨hp2, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rw [hv2p, vadd_vadd]
exact ⟨p2, hp2, v + v2, (vectorSpan k s).add_mem hv hv2, rfl⟩
#align vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span vadd_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_vectorSpan
/-- Subtracting two points in the affine span produces a vector in the spanning submodule. -/
theorem vsub_mem_vectorSpan_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints {s : Set P} {p1 p2 : P}
(hp1 : p1 ∈ spanPoints k s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ spanPoints k s) : p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vectorSpan k s := by
rcases hp1 with ⟨p1a, ⟨hp1a, ⟨v1, ⟨hv1, hv1p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rcases hp2 with ⟨p2a, ⟨hp2a, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rw [hv1p, hv2p, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (v1 +ᵥ p1a), vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc]
have hv1v2 : v1 - v2 ∈ vectorSpan k s := (vectorSpan k s).sub_mem hv1 hv2
refine (vectorSpan k s).add_mem ?_ hv1v2
exact vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp1a hp2a
#align vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points vsub_mem_vectorSpan_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints
end
/-- An `AffineSubspace k P` is a subset of an `AffineSpace V P` that, if not empty, has an affine
space structure induced by a corresponding subspace of the `Module k V`. -/
structure AffineSubspace (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module k V] [AffineSpace V P] where
/-- The affine subspace seen as a subset. -/
carrier : Set P
smul_vsub_vadd_mem :
∀ (c : k) {p1 p2 p3 : P},
p1 ∈ carrier → p2 ∈ carrier → p3 ∈ carrier → c • (p1 -ᵥ p2 : V) +ᵥ p3 ∈ carrier
#align affine_subspace AffineSubspace
namespace Submodule
variable {k V : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
/-- Reinterpret `p : Submodule k V` as an `AffineSubspace k V`. -/
def toAffineSubspace (p : Submodule k V) : AffineSubspace k V where
carrier := p
smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ h₃ := p.add_mem (p.smul_mem _ (p.sub_mem h₁ h₂)) h₃
#align submodule.to_affine_subspace Submodule.toAffineSubspace
end Submodule
namespace AffineSubspace
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AffineSpace V P]
instance : SetLike (AffineSubspace k P) P where
coe := carrier
coe_injective' p q _ := by cases p; cases q; congr
/-- A point is in an affine subspace coerced to a set if and only if it is in that affine
subspace. -/
-- Porting note: removed `simp`, proof is `simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]`
theorem mem_coe (p : P) (s : AffineSubspace k P) : p ∈ (s : Set P) ↔ p ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.mem_coe AffineSubspace.mem_coe
variable {k P}
/-- The direction of an affine subspace is the submodule spanned by
the pairwise differences of points. (Except in the case of an empty
affine subspace, where the direction is the zero submodule, every
vector in the direction is the difference of two points in the affine
subspace.) -/
def direction (s : AffineSubspace k P) : Submodule k V :=
vectorSpan k (s : Set P)
#align affine_subspace.direction AffineSubspace.direction
/-- The direction equals the `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem direction_eq_vectorSpan (s : AffineSubspace k P) : s.direction = vectorSpan k (s : Set P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.direction_eq_vector_span AffineSubspace.direction_eq_vectorSpan
/-- Alternative definition of the direction when the affine subspace is nonempty. This is defined so
that the order on submodules (as used in the definition of `Submodule.span`) can be used in the
proof of `coe_direction_eq_vsub_set`, and is not intended to be used beyond that proof. -/
def directionOfNonempty {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) : Submodule k V where
carrier := (s : Set P) -ᵥ s
zero_mem' := by
cases' h with p hp
exact vsub_self p ▸ vsub_mem_vsub hp hp
add_mem' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩ ⟨p3, hp3, p4, hp4, rfl⟩
rw [← vadd_vsub_assoc]
refine vsub_mem_vsub ?_ hp4
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp3
rw [one_smul]
smul_mem' := by
rintro c _ ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩
rw [← vadd_vsub (c • (p1 -ᵥ p2)) p2]
refine vsub_mem_vsub ?_ hp2
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1 hp2 hp2
#align affine_subspace.direction_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.directionOfNonempty
/-- `direction_of_nonempty` gives the same submodule as `direction`. -/
theorem directionOfNonempty_eq_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
directionOfNonempty h = s.direction := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_le.2 Set.Subset.rfl)
rw [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe, directionOfNonempty, direction, Submodule.coe_set_mk,
AddSubmonoid.coe_set_mk]
exact vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan k _
#align affine_subspace.direction_of_nonempty_eq_direction AffineSubspace.directionOfNonempty_eq_direction
/-- The set of vectors in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace is given by `vsub_set`. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (s : Set P) -ᵥ s :=
directionOfNonempty_eq_direction h ▸ rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set
/-- A vector is in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace if and only if it is the subtraction
of two vectors in the subspace. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p1 -ᵥ p2 := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set h, Set.mem_vsub]
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, eq_comm]
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub
/-- Adding a vector in the direction to a point in the subspace produces a point in the
subspace. -/
theorem vadd_mem_of_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub ⟨p, hp⟩] at hv
rcases hv with ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩
rw [hv]
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp
rw [one_smul]
exact s.mem_coe k P _
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction
/-- Subtracting two points in the subspace produces a vector in the direction. -/
theorem vsub_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ s.direction :=
vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp1 hp2
#align affine_subspace.vsub_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vsub_mem_direction
/-- Adding a vector to a point in a subspace produces a point in the subspace if and only if the
vector is in the direction. -/
theorem vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} (v : V) {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ s ↔ v ∈ s.direction :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using vsub_mem_direction h hp, fun h => vadd_mem_of_mem_direction h hp⟩
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction
/-- Adding a vector in the direction to a point produces a point in the subspace if and only if
the original point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction)
{p : P} : v +ᵥ p ∈ s ↔ p ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv h⟩
convert vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) h
simp
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its direction equals the set of
vectors subtracting that point on the right. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (· -ᵥ p) '' s := by
rw [coe_direction_eq_vsub_set ⟨p, hp⟩]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro v ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p1 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (vsub_mem_direction hp1 hp2) hp, vadd_vsub _ _⟩
· rintro v ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p2, hp2, p, hp, rfl⟩
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its direction equals the set of
vectors subtracting that point on the left. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (p -ᵥ ·) '' s := by
ext v
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, ← Submodule.neg_mem_iff, ← SetLike.mem_coe,
coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_image]
conv_lhs =>
congr
ext
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_inj]
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction if and only if it results from
subtracting that point on the right. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p2 -ᵥ p := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp]
exact ⟨fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction if and only if it results from
subtracting that point on the left. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p -ᵥ p2 := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left hp]
exact ⟨fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that point on the right is in the
direction if and only if the other point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p2 -ᵥ p ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right hp]
simp
#align affine_subspace.vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem AffineSubspace.vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that point on the left is in the
direction if and only if the other point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p -ᵥ p2 ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left hp]
simp
#align affine_subspace.vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem AffineSubspace.vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem
/-- Two affine subspaces are equal if they have the same points. -/
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : AffineSubspace k P → Set P) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
#align affine_subspace.coe_injective AffineSubspace.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : AffineSubspace k P} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ q) : p = q :=
SetLike.ext h
#align affine_subspace.ext AffineSubspace.ext
-- Porting note: removed `simp`, proof is `simp only [SetLike.ext'_iff]`
theorem ext_iff (s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P) : (s₁ : Set P) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.symm
#align affine_subspace.ext_iff AffineSubspace.ext_iff
/-- Two affine subspaces with the same direction and nonempty intersection are equal. -/
theorem ext_of_direction_eq {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (hd : s1.direction = s2.direction)
(hn : ((s1 : Set P) ∩ s2).Nonempty) : s1 = s2 := by
ext p
have hq1 := Set.mem_of_mem_inter_left hn.some_mem
have hq2 := Set.mem_of_mem_inter_right hn.some_mem
constructor
· intro hp
rw [← vsub_vadd p hn.some]
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq2
rw [← hd]
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq1
· intro hp
rw [← vsub_vadd p hn.some]
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq1
rw [hd]
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq2
#align affine_subspace.ext_of_direction_eq AffineSubspace.ext_of_direction_eq
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- This is not an instance because it loops with `AddTorsor.nonempty`. -/
abbrev toAddTorsor (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : AddTorsor s.direction s where
vadd a b := ⟨(a : V) +ᵥ (b : P), vadd_mem_of_mem_direction a.2 b.2⟩
zero_vadd := fun a => by
ext
exact zero_vadd _ _
add_vadd a b c := by
ext
apply add_vadd
vsub a b := ⟨(a : P) -ᵥ (b : P), (vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem a.2 _).mpr b.2⟩
vsub_vadd' a b := by
ext
apply AddTorsor.vsub_vadd'
vadd_vsub' a b := by
ext
apply AddTorsor.vadd_vsub'
#align affine_subspace.to_add_torsor AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
attribute [local instance] toAddTorsor
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_vsub (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (a b : s) : ↑(a -ᵥ b) = (a : P) -ᵥ (b : P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_vsub AffineSubspace.coe_vsub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_vadd (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (a : s.direction) (b : s) :
↑(a +ᵥ b) = (a : V) +ᵥ (b : P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_vadd AffineSubspace.coe_vadd
/-- Embedding of an affine subspace to the ambient space, as an affine map. -/
protected def subtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : s →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun := (↑)
linear := s.direction.subtype
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype AffineSubspace.subtype
@[simp]
theorem subtype_linear (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] :
s.subtype.linear = s.direction.subtype := rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype_linear AffineSubspace.subtype_linear
theorem subtype_apply (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (p : s) : s.subtype p = p :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype_apply AffineSubspace.subtype_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeSubtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : (s.subtype : s → P) = ((↑) : s → P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_subtype AffineSubspace.coeSubtype
theorem injective_subtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : Function.Injective s.subtype :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align affine_subspace.injective_subtype AffineSubspace.injective_subtype
/-- Two affine subspaces with nonempty intersection are equal if and only if their directions are
equal. -/
theorem eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁)
(h₂ : p ∈ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁.direction = s₂.direction :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext_of_direction_eq h ⟨p, h₁, h₂⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem AffineSubspace.eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem
/-- Construct an affine subspace from a point and a direction. -/
def mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : AffineSubspace k P where
carrier := { q | ∃ v ∈ direction, q = v +ᵥ p }
smul_vsub_vadd_mem c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3 := by
rcases hp1 with ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩
rcases hp2 with ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩
rcases hp3 with ⟨v3, hv3, hp3⟩
use c • (v1 - v2) + v3, direction.add_mem (direction.smul_mem c (direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2)) hv3
simp [hp1, hp2, hp3, vadd_vadd]
#align affine_subspace.mk' AffineSubspace.mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains that point. -/
theorem self_mem_mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨0, ⟨direction.zero_mem, (zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.self_mem_mk' AffineSubspace.self_mem_mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains the result of adding a
vector in that direction to that point. -/
theorem vadd_mem_mk' {v : V} (p : P) {direction : Submodule k V} (hv : v ∈ direction) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_mk' AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction is nonempty. -/
theorem mk'_nonempty (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : (mk' p direction : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨p, self_mem_mk' p direction⟩
#align affine_subspace.mk'_nonempty AffineSubspace.mk'_nonempty
/-- The direction of an affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) :
(mk' p direction).direction = direction := by
ext v
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub (mk'_nonempty _ _)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨p1, ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩, p2, ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩, hv⟩
rw [hv, hp1, hp2, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2
· exact fun hv => ⟨v +ᵥ p, vadd_mem_mk' _ hv, p, self_mem_mk' _ _, (vadd_vsub _ _).symm⟩
#align affine_subspace.direction_mk' AffineSubspace.direction_mk'
/-- A point lies in an affine subspace constructed from another point and a direction if and only
if their difference is in that direction. -/
theorem mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem {p₁ p₂ : P} {direction : Submodule k V} :
p₂ ∈ mk' p₁ direction ↔ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ ∈ direction := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← direction_mk' p₁ direction]
exact vsub_mem_direction h (self_mem_mk' _ _)
· rw [← vsub_vadd p₂ p₁]
exact vadd_mem_mk' p₁ h
#align affine_subspace.mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem AffineSubspace.mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem
/-- Constructing an affine subspace from a point in a subspace and that subspace's direction
yields the original subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) : mk' p s.direction = s :=
ext_of_direction_eq (direction_mk' p s.direction) ⟨p, Set.mem_inter (self_mem_mk' _ _) hp⟩
#align affine_subspace.mk'_eq AffineSubspace.mk'_eq
/-- If an affine subspace contains a set of points, it contains the `spanPoints` of that set. -/
theorem spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe {s : Set P} {s1 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s ⊆ s1) :
spanPoints k s ⊆ s1 := by
rintro p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, hp⟩
rw [hp]
have hp1s1 : p1 ∈ (s1 : Set P) := Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp1 h
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hp1s1
have hs : vectorSpan k s ≤ s1.direction := vectorSpan_mono k h
rw [SetLike.le_def] at hs
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hv hs
#align affine_subspace.span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe AffineSubspace.spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe
end AffineSubspace
namespace Submodule
variable {k V : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
@[simp]
theorem mem_toAffineSubspace {p : Submodule k V} {x : V} :
x ∈ p.toAffineSubspace ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toAffineSubspace_direction (s : Submodule k V) : s.toAffineSubspace.direction = s := by
ext x; simp [← s.toAffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ s.zero_mem]
end Submodule
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/AffineSubspace.lean | 525 | 529 | theorem AffineMap.lineMap_mem {k V P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AddTorsor V P] {Q : AffineSubspace k P} {p₀ p₁ : P} (c : k) (h₀ : p₀ ∈ Q) (h₁ : p₁ ∈ Q) :
AffineMap.lineMap p₀ p₁ c ∈ Q := by |
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply]
exact Q.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c h₁ h₀ h₀
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.WithDensity
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
#align_import measure_theory.function.strongly_measurable.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3b52265189f3fb43aa631edffce5d060fafaf82f"
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure. We also provide almost everywhere versions of
these notions.
Almost everywhere strongly measurable functions form the largest class of functions that can be
integrated using the Bochner integral.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
* `AEStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `StronglyMeasurable` function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `FinStronglyMeasurable`
function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.sigmaFiniteSet`: a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
## Main statements
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, and for almost everywhere strongly
measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## References
* Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.FinStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure `μ` if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions. -/
def AEStronglyMeasurable
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, StronglyMeasurable g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEFinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions with support with finite measure. -/
def AEFinStronglyMeasurable
[Zero β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, FinStronglyMeasurable g μ ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEFinStronglyMeasurable
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
@[aesop 30% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
⟨f, hf, EventuallyEq.refl _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· have h_univ : f ⁻¹' {x} = Set.univ := by
ext1 y
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [h_univ]
exact MeasurableSet.univ
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable
@[nontriviality]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")]
alias stronglyMeasurable_of_fintype := StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_finite (since := "2024-02-06")]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_finite f
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {b : β} :
StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [One β] :
StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) :=
stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_one MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_one
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_zero MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_zero
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 164 | 169 | theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' {α β} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by |
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Basic
#align_import algebra.order.hom.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"28aa996fc6fb4317f0083c4e6daf79878d81be33"
/-!
# Algebraic order homomorphism classes
This file defines hom classes for common properties at the intersection of order theory and algebra.
## Typeclasses
Basic typeclasses
* `NonnegHomClass`: Homs are nonnegative: `∀ f a, 0 ≤ f a`
* `SubadditiveHomClass`: Homs are subadditive: `∀ f a b, f (a + b) ≤ f a + f b`
* `SubmultiplicativeHomClass`: Homs are submultiplicative: `∀ f a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b`
* `MulLEAddHomClass`: `∀ f a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a + f b`
* `NonarchimedeanHomClass`: `∀ a b, f (a + b) ≤ max (f a) (f b)`
Group norms
* `AddGroupSeminormClass`: Homs are nonnegative, subadditive, even and preserve zero.
* `GroupSeminormClass`: Homs are nonnegative, respect `f (a * b) ≤ f a + f b`, `f a⁻¹ = f a` and
preserve zero.
* `AddGroupNormClass`: Homs are seminorms such that `f x = 0 → x = 0` for all `x`.
* `GroupNormClass`: Homs are seminorms such that `f x = 0 → x = 1` for all `x`.
Ring norms
* `RingSeminormClass`: Homs are submultiplicative group norms.
* `RingNormClass`: Homs are ring seminorms that are also additive group norms.
* `MulRingSeminormClass`: Homs are ring seminorms that are multiplicative.
* `MulRingNormClass`: Homs are ring norms that are multiplicative.
## Notes
Typeclasses for seminorms are defined here while types of seminorms are defined in
`Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm` and `Analysis.Normed.Ring.Seminorm` because absolute values are
multiplicative ring norms but outside of this use we only consider real-valued seminorms.
## TODO
Finitary versions of the current lemmas.
-/
library_note "out-param inheritance"/--
Diamond inheritance cannot depend on `outParam`s in the following circumstances:
* there are three classes `Top`, `Middle`, `Bottom`
* all of these classes have a parameter `(α : outParam _)`
* all of these classes have an instance parameter `[Root α]` that depends on this `outParam`
* the `Root` class has two child classes: `Left` and `Right`, these are siblings in the hierarchy
* the instance `Bottom.toMiddle` takes a `[Left α]` parameter
* the instance `Middle.toTop` takes a `[Right α]` parameter
* there is a `Leaf` class that inherits from both `Left` and `Right`.
In that case, given instances `Bottom α` and `Leaf α`, Lean cannot synthesize a `Top α` instance,
even though the hypotheses of the instances `Bottom.toMiddle` and `Middle.toTop` are satisfied.
There are two workarounds:
* You could replace the bundled inheritance implemented by the instance `Middle.toTop` with
unbundled inheritance implemented by adding a `[Top α]` parameter to the `Middle` class. This is
the preferred option since it is also more compatible with Lean 4, at the cost of being more work
to implement and more verbose to use.
* You could weaken the `Bottom.toMiddle` instance by making it depend on a subclass of
`Middle.toTop`'s parameter, in this example replacing `[Left α]` with `[Leaf α]`.
-/
open Function
variable {ι F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-! ### Basics -/
/-- `NonnegHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of nonnegative morphisms. -/
class NonnegHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Zero β] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of any element is non negative. -/
apply_nonneg (f : F) : ∀ a, 0 ≤ f a
#align nonneg_hom_class NonnegHomClass
/-- `SubadditiveHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of subadditive morphisms. -/
class SubadditiveHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Add α] [Add β] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of a sum is less or equal than the sum of the images. -/
map_add_le_add (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a + b) ≤ f a + f b
#align subadditive_hom_class SubadditiveHomClass
/-- `SubmultiplicativeHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of submultiplicative morphisms. -/
@[to_additive SubadditiveHomClass]
class SubmultiplicativeHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Mul α] [Mul β] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of a product is less or equal than the product of the images. -/
map_mul_le_mul (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b
#align submultiplicative_hom_class SubmultiplicativeHomClass
/-- `MulLEAddHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of subadditive morphisms. -/
@[to_additive SubadditiveHomClass]
class MulLEAddHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Mul α] [Add β] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of a product is less or equal than the sum of the images. -/
map_mul_le_add (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a + f b
#align mul_le_add_hom_class MulLEAddHomClass
/-- `NonarchimedeanHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of non-archimedean morphisms. -/
class NonarchimedeanHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Add α] [LinearOrder β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of a sum is less or equal than the maximum of the images. -/
map_add_le_max (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a + b) ≤ max (f a) (f b)
#align nonarchimedean_hom_class NonarchimedeanHomClass
export NonnegHomClass (apply_nonneg)
export SubadditiveHomClass (map_add_le_add)
export SubmultiplicativeHomClass (map_mul_le_mul)
export MulLEAddHomClass (map_mul_le_add)
export NonarchimedeanHomClass (map_add_le_max)
attribute [simp] apply_nonneg
variable [FunLike F α β]
@[to_additive]
theorem le_map_mul_map_div [Group α] [CommSemigroup β] [LE β] [SubmultiplicativeHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (a b : α) : f a ≤ f b * f (a / b) := by
simpa only [mul_comm, div_mul_cancel] using map_mul_le_mul f (a / b) b
#align le_map_mul_map_div le_map_mul_map_div
#align le_map_add_map_sub le_map_add_map_sub
@[to_additive existing]
theorem le_map_add_map_div [Group α] [AddCommSemigroup β] [LE β] [MulLEAddHomClass F α β] (f : F)
(a b : α) : f a ≤ f b + f (a / b) := by
simpa only [add_comm, div_mul_cancel] using map_mul_le_add f (a / b) b
#align le_map_add_map_div le_map_add_map_div
-- #align le_map_add_map_sub le_map_add_map_sub
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: `to_additive` clashes
@[to_additive]
theorem le_map_div_mul_map_div [Group α] [CommSemigroup β] [LE β] [SubmultiplicativeHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (a b c : α) : f (a / c) ≤ f (a / b) * f (b / c) := by
simpa only [div_mul_div_cancel'] using map_mul_le_mul f (a / b) (b / c)
#align le_map_div_mul_map_div le_map_div_mul_map_div
#align le_map_sub_add_map_sub le_map_sub_add_map_sub
@[to_additive existing]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Hom/Basic.lean | 146 | 148 | theorem le_map_div_add_map_div [Group α] [AddCommSemigroup β] [LE β] [MulLEAddHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (a b c : α) : f (a / c) ≤ f (a / b) + f (b / c) := by |
simpa only [div_mul_div_cancel'] using map_mul_le_add f (a / b) (b / c)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
/-!
# The set lattice
This file provides usual set notation for unions and intersections, a `CompleteLattice` instance
for `Set α`, and some more set constructions.
## Main declarations
* `Set.iUnion`: **i**ndexed **union**. Union of an indexed family of sets.
* `Set.iInter`: **i**ndexed **inter**section. Intersection of an indexed family of sets.
* `Set.sInter`: **s**et **inter**section. Intersection of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `Set.sUnion`: **s**et **union**. Union of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.BooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.kernImage`: For a function `f : α → β`, `s.kernImage f` is the set of `y` such that
`f ⁻¹ y ⊆ s`.
* `Set.seq`: Union of the image of a set under a **seq**uence of functions. `seq s t` is the union
of `f '' t` over all `f ∈ s`, where `t : Set α` and `s : Set (α → β)`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
section GaloisConnection
variable {f : α → β}
protected theorem image_preimage : GaloisConnection (image f) (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
image_subset_iff
#align set.image_preimage Set.image_preimage
protected theorem preimage_kernImage : GaloisConnection (preimage f) (kernImage f) := fun _ _ =>
subset_kernImage_iff.symm
#align set.preimage_kern_image Set.preimage_kernImage
end GaloisConnection
section kernImage
variable {f : α → β}
lemma kernImage_mono : Monotone (kernImage f) :=
Set.preimage_kernImage.monotone_u
lemma kernImage_eq_compl {s : Set α} : kernImage f s = (f '' sᶜ)ᶜ :=
Set.preimage_kernImage.u_unique (Set.image_preimage.compl)
(fun t ↦ compl_compl (f ⁻¹' t) ▸ Set.preimage_compl)
lemma kernImage_compl {s : Set α} : kernImage f (sᶜ) = (f '' s)ᶜ := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, compl_compl]
lemma kernImage_empty : kernImage f ∅ = (range f)ᶜ := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, compl_empty, image_univ]
lemma kernImage_preimage_eq_iff {s : Set β} : kernImage f (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ (range f)ᶜ ⊆ s := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, ← preimage_compl, compl_eq_comm, eq_comm, image_preimage_eq_iff,
compl_subset_comm]
lemma compl_range_subset_kernImage {s : Set α} : (range f)ᶜ ⊆ kernImage f s := by
rw [← kernImage_empty]
exact kernImage_mono (empty_subset _)
lemma kernImage_union_preimage {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
kernImage f (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) = kernImage f s ∪ t := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, kernImage_eq_compl, compl_union, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage,
compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma kernImage_preimage_union {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
kernImage f (f ⁻¹' t ∪ s) = t ∪ kernImage f s := by
rw [union_comm, kernImage_union_preimage, union_comm]
end kernImage
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' j') -/
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' j') -/
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
#align set.Union_const Set.iUnion_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
#align set.Inter_const Set.iInter_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
#align set.Union_eq_const Set.iUnion_eq_const
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
#align set.Inter_eq_const Set.iInter_eq_const
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
#align set.compl_Union₂ Set.compl_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
#align set.compl_Inter Set.compl_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
#align set.compl_Inter₂ Set.compl_iInter₂
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
#align set.Union_eq_compl_Inter_compl Set.iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
#align set.Inter_eq_compl_Union_compl Set.iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
#align set.inter_Union Set.inter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
#align set.Union_inter Set.iUnion_inter
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
#align set.Union_union_distrib Set.iUnion_union_distrib
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
#align set.Inter_inter_distrib Set.iInter_inter_distrib
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
#align set.union_Union Set.union_iUnion
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
#align set.Union_union Set.iUnion_union
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
#align set.inter_Inter Set.inter_iInter
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
#align set.Inter_inter Set.iInter_inter
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_Inter Set.union_iInter
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.Inter_union Set.iInter_union
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
#align set.Union_diff Set.iUnion_diff
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
#align set.diff_Union Set.diff_iUnion
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
#align set.diff_Inter Set.diff_iInter
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
#align set.Union_inter_subset Set.iUnion_inter_subset
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_monotone Set.iUnion_inter_of_monotone
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_antitone Set.iUnion_inter_of_antitone
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_monotone Set.iInter_union_of_monotone
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_antitone Set.iInter_union_of_antitone
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
#align set.Union_Inter_subset Set.iUnion_iInter_subset
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
#align set.Union_option Set.iUnion_option
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
#align set.Inter_option Set.iInter_option
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_dite Set.iUnion_dite
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_ite Set.iUnion_ite
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_dite Set.iInter_dite
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_ite Set.iInter_ite
end
theorem image_projection_prod {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {v : ∀ i : ι, Set (α i)}
(hv : (pi univ v).Nonempty) (i : ι) :
((fun x : ∀ i : ι, α i => x i) '' ⋂ k, (fun x : ∀ j : ι, α j => x k) ⁻¹' v k) = v i := by
classical
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp [iInter_subset]
· intro y y_in
simp only [mem_image, mem_iInter, mem_preimage]
rcases hv with ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨Function.update z i y, ?_, update_same i y z⟩
rw [@forall_update_iff ι α _ z i y fun i t => t ∈ v i]
exact ⟨y_in, fun j _ => by simpa using hz j⟩
#align set.image_projection_prod Set.image_projection_prod
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
#align set.Inter_false Set.iInter_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
#align set.Union_false Set.iUnion_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
#align set.Inter_true Set.iInter_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
#align set.Union_true Set.iUnion_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
#align set.Inter_exists Set.iInter_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_exists Set.iUnion_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
#align set.Union_empty Set.iUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
#align set.Inter_univ Set.iInter_univ
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
#align set.Union_eq_empty Set.iUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
#align set.Inter_eq_univ Set.iInter_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_Union Set.nonempty_iUnion
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
#align set.nonempty_bUnion Set.nonempty_biUnion
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_nonempty_index Set.iUnion_nonempty_index
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_right Set.iInter_iInter_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align set.Union_Union_eq_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
#align set.Union_Union_eq_right Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
#align set.Inter_or Set.iInter_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
#align set.Union_or Set.iUnion_or
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (hp hq) -/
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
#align set.Union_and Set.iUnion_and
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (hp hq) -/
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
#align set.Inter_and Set.iInter_and
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i i') -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' i) -/
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
#align set.Union_comm Set.iUnion_comm
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i i') -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' i) -/
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
#align set.Inter_comm Set.iInter_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) -/
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
#align set.Union₂_comm Set.iUnion₂_comm
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) -/
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
#align set.Inter₂_comm Set.iInter₂_comm
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
#align set.bUnion_and Set.biUnion_and
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_and' Set.biUnion_and'
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
#align set.bInter_and Set.biInter_and
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_and' Set.biInter_and'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x h) -/
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
#align set.Union_Union_eq_or_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x h) -/
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_or_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_or_left
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
#align set.mem_bUnion Set.mem_biUnion
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
#align set.mem_bInter Set.mem_biInter
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
-- Porting note: Why is this not just `subset_iUnion₂ x xs`?
@subset_iUnion₂ β α (· ∈ s) (fun i _ => u i) x xs
#align set.subset_bUnion_of_mem Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
#align set.bInter_subset_of_mem Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bInter_subset_bInter_left Set.biInter_subset_biInter_left
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
#align set.bUnion_mono Set.biUnion_mono
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
#align set.bInter_mono Set.biInter_mono
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.bUnion_eq_Union Set.biUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
#align set.bInter_eq_Inter Set.biInter_eq_iInter
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
#align set.Union_subtype Set.iUnion_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
#align set.Inter_subtype Set.iInter_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align set.bInter_empty Set.biInter_empty
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
#align set.bInter_univ Set.biInter_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
#align set.bUnion_self Set.biUnion_self
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
#align set.Union_nonempty_self Set.iUnion_nonempty_self
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
#align set.bInter_singleton Set.biInter_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
#align set.bInter_union Set.biInter_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bInter_insert Set.biInter_insert
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
#align set.bInter_pair Set.biInter_pair
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
#align set.bInter_inter Set.biInter_inter
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
#align set.inter_bInter Set.inter_biInter
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
#align set.bUnion_empty Set.biUnion_empty
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
#align set.bUnion_univ Set.biUnion_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
#align set.bUnion_singleton Set.biUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.bUnion_of_singleton Set.biUnion_of_singleton
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
#align set.bUnion_union Set.biUnion_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
#align set.Union_coe_set Set.iUnion_coe_set
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
#align set.Inter_coe_set Set.iInter_coe_set
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bUnion_insert Set.biUnion_insert
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
#align set.bUnion_pair Set.biUnion_pair
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
#align set.inter_Union₂ Set.inter_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
#align set.Union₂_inter Set.iUnion₂_inter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
#align set.union_Inter₂ Set.union_iInter₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
#align set.Inter₂_union Set.iInter₂_union
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
#align set.mem_sUnion_of_mem Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
#align set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion Set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
#align set.sInter_subset_of_mem Set.sInter_subset_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀S :=
le_sSup tS
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_mem Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_subset Set.subset_sUnion_of_subset
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
#align set.sUnion_subset Set.sUnion_subset
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
#align set.sUnion_subset_iff Set.sUnion_subset_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
#align set.subset_sInter Set.subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
#align set.subset_sInter_iff Set.subset_sInter_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀S ⊆ ⋃₀T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sUnion_subset_sUnion Set.sUnion_subset_sUnion
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sInter_subset_sInter Set.sInter_subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
#align set.sUnion_empty Set.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
#align set.sInter_empty Set.sInter_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀{s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
#align set.sUnion_singleton Set.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
#align set.sInter_singleton Set.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
#align set.sUnion_eq_empty Set.sUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
#align set.sInter_eq_univ Set.sInter_eq_univ
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnion_powerset_gi :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_sUnion Set.nonempty_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(S ∪ T) = ⋃₀S ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_union
#align set.sUnion_union Set.sUnion_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
#align set.sInter_union Set.sInter_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_insert
#align set.sUnion_insert Set.sUnion_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
#align set.sInter_insert Set.sInter_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
#align set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty Set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
#align set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ Set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀{s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
#align set.sUnion_pair Set.sUnion_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
#align set.sInter_pair Set.sInter_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀(f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sSup_image
#align set.sUnion_image Set.sUnion_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
sInf_image
#align set.sInter_image Set.sInter_image
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sUnion_range Set.sUnion_range
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sInter_range Set.sInter_range
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion_eq_univ_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union₂_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff Set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.Inter_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter_eq_empty_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
#align set.Inter₂_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter₂_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.sInter_eq_empty_iff Set.sInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_Inter Set.nonempty_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- classical
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
#align set.nonempty_Inter₂ Set.nonempty_iInter₂
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_sInter Set.nonempty_sInter
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.compl_sUnion Set.compl_sUnion
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀S), compl_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl Set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀(compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
#align set.compl_sInter Set.compl_sInter
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀(compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
#align set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl Set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
#align set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty Set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align set.range_sigma_eq_Union_range Set.range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_sigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_sigma
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_psigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_psigma
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
cases' x with i a
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
#align set.Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self Set.iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
#align set.sigma.univ Set.Sigma.univ
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
#align set.sUnion_mono Set.sUnion_mono
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
#align set.Union_subset_Union_const Set.iUnion_subset_iUnion_const
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
#align set.Union_singleton_eq_range Set.iUnion_singleton_eq_range
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_of_singleton Set.iUnion_of_singleton
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
#align set.Union_of_singleton_coe Set.iUnion_of_singleton_coe
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
#align set.sUnion_eq_bUnion Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
#align set.sInter_eq_bInter Set.sInter_eq_biInter
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sUnion_eq_Union Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sInter_eq_Inter Set.sInter_eq_iInter
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
#align set.Union_of_empty Set.iUnion_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
#align set.Inter_of_empty Set.iInter_of_empty
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
#align set.union_eq_Union Set.union_eq_iUnion
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
#align set.inter_eq_Inter Set.inter_eq_iInter
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
#align set.sInter_union_sInter Set.sInter_union_sInter
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀s ∩ ⋃₀t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
#align set.sUnion_inter_sUnion Set.sUnion_inter_sUnion
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_Union Set.biUnion_iUnion
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_Union Set.biInter_iUnion
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
#align set.sUnion_Union Set.sUnion_iUnion
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
#align set.sInter_Union Set.sInter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
cases' hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
#align set.Union_range_eq_sUnion Set.iUnion_range_eq_sUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
cases' hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
#align set.Union_range_eq_Union Set.iUnion_range_eq_iUnion
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_left Set.union_distrib_iInter_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_left Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_right Set.union_distrib_iInter_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_right Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_right
section Function
/-! ### Lemmas about `Set.MapsTo`
Porting note: some lemmas in this section were upgraded from implications to `iff`s.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, MapsTo f s t :=
sUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_sUnion Set.mapsTo_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) t :=
iUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) t :=
iUnion₂_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂
theorem mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iUnion.2 fun i ↦ (H i).mono_right (subset_iUnion t i)
#align set.maps_to_Union_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Union₂_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sInter {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂₀ T) ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, MapsTo f s t :=
forall₂_swap
#align set.maps_to_sInter Set.mapsTo_sInter
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f s (t i) :=
mapsTo_sInter.trans forall_mem_range
#align set.maps_to_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f s (t i j) := by
simp only [mapsTo_iInter]
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂
theorem mapsTo_iInter_iInter {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iInter.2 fun i => (H i).mono_left (iInter_subset s i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_iInter_iInter (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂
theorem image_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : (f '' ⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, f '' s i :=
(mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_image f (s i)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter_subset Set.image_iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iInter₂_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (f : α → β) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j :=
(mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ fun i hi => mapsTo_image f (s i hi)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter₂_subset Set.image_iInter₂_subset
theorem image_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) : f '' ⋂₀ S ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, f '' s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
apply image_iInter₂_subset
#align set.image_sInter_subset Set.image_sInter_subset
/-! ### `restrictPreimage` -/
section
open Function
variable (s : Set β) {f : α → β} {U : ι → Set β} (hU : iUnion U = univ)
theorem injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Injective f ↔ ∀ i, Injective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_injective H, fun H x y e => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show f x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
injection @H i ⟨x, hi⟩ ⟨y, show f y ∈ U i from e ▸ hi⟩ (Subtype.ext e)
#align set.injective_iff_injective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Surjective f ↔ ∀ i, Surjective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_surjective H, fun H x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
exact ⟨_, congr_arg Subtype.val (H i ⟨x, hi⟩).choose_spec⟩
#align set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Bijective f ↔ ∀ i, Bijective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
rw [Bijective, injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU,
surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU]
simp [Bijective, forall_and]
#align set.bijective_iff_bijective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
end
/-! ### `InjOn` -/
theorem InjOn.image_iInter_eq [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {f : α → β} (h : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) :
(f '' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' s i := by
inhabit ι
refine Subset.antisymm (image_iInter_subset s f) fun y hy => ?_
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_image] at hy
choose x hx hy using hy
refine ⟨x default, mem_iInter.2 fun i => ?_, hy _⟩
suffices x default = x i by
rw [this]
apply hx
replace hx : ∀ i, x i ∈ ⋃ j, s j := fun i => (subset_iUnion _ _) (hx i)
apply h (hx _) (hx _)
simp only [hy]
#align set.inj_on.image_Inter_eq Set.InjOn.image_iInter_eq
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
theorem InjOn.image_biInter_eq {p : ι → Prop} {s : ∀ i, p i → Set α} (hp : ∃ i, p i)
{f : α → β} (h : InjOn f (⋃ (i) (hi), s i hi)) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (hi), s i hi) = ⋂ (i) (hi), f '' s i hi := by
simp only [iInter, iInf_subtype']
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 hp
apply InjOn.image_iInter_eq
simpa only [iUnion, iSup_subtype'] using h
#align set.inj_on.image_bInter_eq Set.InjOn.image_biInter_eq
theorem image_iInter {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (s : ι → Set α) :
(f '' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' s i := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp_rw [iInter_of_empty, image_univ_of_surjective hf.surjective]
· exact hf.injective.injOn.image_iInter_eq
#align set.image_Inter Set.image_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iInter₂ {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iInter hf]
#align set.image_Inter₂ Set.image_iInter₂
theorem inj_on_iUnion_of_directed {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, InjOn f (s i)) : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hx with ⟨i, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hy with ⟨j, hy⟩
rcases hs i j with ⟨k, hi, hj⟩
exact hf k (hi hx) (hj hy) hxy
#align set.inj_on_Union_of_directed Set.inj_on_iUnion_of_directed
/-! ### `SurjOn` -/
theorem surjOn_sUnion {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ t ∈ T, SurjOn f s t) :
SurjOn f s (⋃₀T) := fun _ ⟨t, ht, hx⟩ => H t ht hx
#align set.surj_on_sUnion Set.surjOn_sUnion
theorem surjOn_iUnion {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, SurjOn f s (t i)) :
SurjOn f s (⋃ i, t i) :=
surjOn_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 H
#align set.surj_on_Union Set.surjOn_iUnion
theorem surjOn_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) (t i)) : SurjOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
surjOn_iUnion fun i => (H i).mono (subset_iUnion _ _) (Subset.refl _)
#align set.surj_on_Union_Union Set.surjOn_iUnion_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem surjOn_iUnion₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, SurjOn f s (t i j)) : SurjOn f s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
surjOn_iUnion fun i => surjOn_iUnion (H i)
#align set.surj_on_Union₂ Set.surjOn_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem surjOn_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, SurjOn f (s i j) (t i j)) : SurjOn f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
surjOn_iUnion_iUnion fun i => surjOn_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.surj_on_Union₂_Union₂ Set.surjOn_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
theorem surjOn_iInter [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) t) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : SurjOn f (⋂ i, s i) t := by
intro y hy
rw [Hinj.image_iInter_eq, mem_iInter]
exact fun i => H i hy
#align set.surj_on_Inter Set.surjOn_iInter
theorem surjOn_iInter_iInter [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : SurjOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
surjOn_iInter (fun i => (H i).mono (Subset.refl _) (iInter_subset _ _)) Hinj
#align set.surj_on_Inter_Inter Set.surjOn_iInter_iInter
/-! ### `BijOn` -/
theorem bijOn_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i))
(Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : BijOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
⟨mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => (H i).mapsTo, Hinj, surjOn_iUnion_iUnion fun i => (H i).surjOn⟩
#align set.bij_on_Union Set.bijOn_iUnion
theorem bijOn_iInter [hi : Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : BijOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
⟨mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => (H i).mapsTo,
hi.elim fun i => (H i).injOn.mono (iInter_subset _ _),
surjOn_iInter_iInter (fun i => (H i).surjOn) Hinj⟩
#align set.bij_on_Inter Set.bijOn_iInter
theorem bijOn_iUnion_of_directed {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) {t : ι → Set β}
{f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) : BijOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
bijOn_iUnion H <| inj_on_iUnion_of_directed hs fun i => (H i).injOn
#align set.bij_on_Union_of_directed Set.bijOn_iUnion_of_directed
theorem bijOn_iInter_of_directed [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) : BijOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
bijOn_iInter H <| inj_on_iUnion_of_directed hs fun i => (H i).injOn
#align set.bij_on_Inter_of_directed Set.bijOn_iInter_of_directed
end Function
/-! ### `image`, `preimage` -/
section Image
theorem image_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set α} : (f '' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f '' s i := by
ext1 x
simp only [mem_image, mem_iUnion, ← exists_and_right, ← exists_and_left]
-- Porting note: `exists_swap` causes a `simp` loop in Lean4 so we use `rw` instead.
rw [exists_swap]
#align set.image_Union Set.image_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iUnion₂ (f : α → β) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iUnion]
#align set.image_Union₂ Set.image_iUnion₂
theorem univ_subtype {p : α → Prop} : (univ : Set (Subtype p)) = ⋃ (x) (h : p x), {⟨x, h⟩} :=
Set.ext fun ⟨x, h⟩ => by simp [h]
#align set.univ_subtype Set.univ_subtype
theorem range_eq_iUnion {ι} (f : ι → α) : range f = ⋃ i, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [@eq_comm α a]
#align set.range_eq_Union Set.range_eq_iUnion
theorem image_eq_iUnion (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = ⋃ i ∈ s, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [@eq_comm β b]
#align set.image_eq_Union Set.image_eq_iUnion
theorem biUnion_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋃ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) :=
iSup_range
#align set.bUnion_range Set.biUnion_range
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x y) -/
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋃ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) := by simpa using biUnion_range
#align set.Union_Union_eq' Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq'
theorem biInter_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋂ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋂ y, g (f y) :=
iInf_range
#align set.bInter_range Set.biInter_range
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x y) -/
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋂ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋂ y, g (f y) := by simpa using biInter_range
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq' Set.iInter_iInter_eq'
variable {s : Set γ} {f : γ → α} {g : α → Set β}
theorem biUnion_image : ⋃ x ∈ f '' s, g x = ⋃ y ∈ s, g (f y) :=
iSup_image
#align set.bUnion_image Set.biUnion_image
theorem biInter_image : ⋂ x ∈ f '' s, g x = ⋂ y ∈ s, g (f y) :=
iInf_image
#align set.bInter_image Set.biInter_image
end Image
section Preimage
theorem monotone_preimage {f : α → β} : Monotone (preimage f) := fun _ _ h => preimage_mono h
#align set.monotone_preimage Set.monotone_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f ⁻¹' s i :=
Set.ext <| by simp [preimage]
#align set.preimage_Union Set.preimage_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem preimage_iUnion₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by simp_rw [preimage_iUnion]
#align set.preimage_Union₂ Set.preimage_iUnion₂
theorem image_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set α)} : (f '' ⋃₀ s) = ⋃₀ (image f '' s) := by
ext b
simp only [mem_image, mem_sUnion, exists_prop, sUnion_image, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, ht₁, a, ht₂, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨t, ht₁, a, ht₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} : f ⁻¹' ⋃₀s = ⋃ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, preimage_iUnion₂]
#align set.preimage_sUnion Set.preimage_sUnion
theorem preimage_iInter {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f ⁻¹' s i := by
ext; simp
#align set.preimage_Inter Set.preimage_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem preimage_iInter₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by simp_rw [preimage_iInter]
#align set.preimage_Inter₂ Set.preimage_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sInter {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} : f ⁻¹' ⋂₀ s = ⋂ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, preimage_iInter₂]
#align set.preimage_sInter Set.preimage_sInter
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : ⋃ y ∈ s, f ⁻¹' {y} = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [← preimage_iUnion₂, biUnion_of_singleton]
#align set.bUnion_preimage_singleton Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton
theorem biUnion_range_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) : ⋃ y ∈ range f, f ⁻¹' {y} = univ := by
rw [biUnion_preimage_singleton, preimage_range]
#align set.bUnion_range_preimage_singleton Set.biUnion_range_preimage_singleton
end Preimage
section Prod
theorem prod_iUnion {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} : (s ×ˢ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ×ˢ t i := by
ext
simp
#align set.prod_Union Set.prod_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem prod_iUnion₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(s ×ˢ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ×ˢ t i j := by simp_rw [prod_iUnion]
#align set.prod_Union₂ Set.prod_iUnion₂
theorem prod_sUnion {s : Set α} {C : Set (Set β)} : s ×ˢ ⋃₀C = ⋃₀((fun t => s ×ˢ t) '' C) := by
simp_rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_image, prod_iUnion₂]
#align set.prod_sUnion Set.prod_sUnion
theorem iUnion_prod_const {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} : (⋃ i, s i) ×ˢ t = ⋃ i, s i ×ˢ t := by
ext
simp
#align set.Union_prod_const Set.iUnion_prod_const
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_prod_const {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ×ˢ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ×ˢ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_prod_const]
#align set.Union₂_prod_const Set.iUnion₂_prod_const
theorem sUnion_prod_const {C : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} :
⋃₀C ×ˢ t = ⋃₀((fun s : Set α => s ×ˢ t) '' C) := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, iUnion₂_prod_const, biUnion_image]
#align set.sUnion_prod_const Set.sUnion_prod_const
theorem iUnion_prod {ι ι' α β} (s : ι → Set α) (t : ι' → Set β) :
⋃ x : ι × ι', s x.1 ×ˢ t x.2 = (⋃ i : ι, s i) ×ˢ ⋃ i : ι', t i := by
ext
simp
#align set.Union_prod Set.iUnion_prod
/-- Analogue of `iSup_prod` for sets. -/
lemma iUnion_prod' (f : β × γ → Set α) : ⋃ x : β × γ, f x = ⋃ (i : β) (j : γ), f (i, j) :=
iSup_prod
theorem iUnion_prod_of_monotone [SemilatticeSup α] {s : α → Set β} {t : α → Set γ} (hs : Monotone s)
(ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ x, s x ×ˢ t x = (⋃ x, s x) ×ˢ ⋃ x, t x := by
ext ⟨z, w⟩; simp only [mem_prod, mem_iUnion, exists_imp, and_imp, iff_def]; constructor
· intro x hz hw
exact ⟨⟨x, hz⟩, x, hw⟩
· intro x hz x' hw
exact ⟨x ⊔ x', hs le_sup_left hz, ht le_sup_right hw⟩
#align set.Union_prod_of_monotone Set.iUnion_prod_of_monotone
theorem sInter_prod_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (T : Set (Set β)) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂ r ∈ S ×ˢ T, r.1 ×ˢ r.2 :=
subset_iInter₂ fun x hx _ hy => ⟨hy.1 x.1 hx.1, hy.2 x.2 hx.2⟩
#align set.sInter_prod_sInter_subset Set.sInter_prod_sInter_subset
theorem sInter_prod_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {T : Set (Set β)} (hS : S.Nonempty) (hT : T.Nonempty) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ r ∈ S ×ˢ T, r.1 ×ˢ r.2 := by
obtain ⟨s₁, h₁⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨s₂, h₂⟩ := hT
refine Set.Subset.antisymm (sInter_prod_sInter_subset S T) fun x hx => ?_
rw [mem_iInter₂] at hx
exact ⟨fun s₀ h₀ => (hx (s₀, s₂) ⟨h₀, h₂⟩).1, fun s₀ h₀ => (hx (s₁, s₀) ⟨h₁, h₀⟩).2⟩
#align set.sInter_prod_sInter Set.sInter_prod_sInter
theorem sInter_prod {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Nonempty) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ t = ⋂ s ∈ S, s ×ˢ t := by
rw [← sInter_singleton t, sInter_prod_sInter hS (singleton_nonempty t), sInter_singleton]
simp_rw [prod_singleton, mem_image, iInter_exists, biInter_and', iInter_iInter_eq_right]
#align set.sInter_prod Set.sInter_prod
theorem prod_sInter {T : Set (Set β)} (hT : T.Nonempty) (s : Set α) :
s ×ˢ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ t ∈ T, s ×ˢ t := by
rw [← sInter_singleton s, sInter_prod_sInter (singleton_nonempty s) hT, sInter_singleton]
simp_rw [singleton_prod, mem_image, iInter_exists, biInter_and', iInter_iInter_eq_right]
#align set.prod_sInter Set.prod_sInter
theorem prod_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} [hι : Nonempty ι] :
(s ×ˢ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ×ˢ t i := by
ext x
simp only [mem_prod, mem_iInter]
exact ⟨fun h i => ⟨h.1, h.2 i⟩, fun h => ⟨(h hι.some).1, fun i => (h i).2⟩⟩
#align prod_Inter Set.prod_iInter
end Prod
section Image2
variable (f : α → β → γ) {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
/-- The `Set.image2` version of `Set.image_eq_iUnion` -/
theorem image2_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = ⋃ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t), {f i j} := by
ext; simp [eq_comm]
#align set.image2_eq_Union Set.image2_eq_iUnion
theorem iUnion_image_left : ⋃ a ∈ s, f a '' t = image2 f s t := by
simp only [image2_eq_iUnion, image_eq_iUnion]
#align set.Union_image_left Set.iUnion_image_left
theorem iUnion_image_right : ⋃ b ∈ t, (f · b) '' s = image2 f s t := by
rw [image2_swap, iUnion_image_left]
#align set.Union_image_right Set.iUnion_image_right
theorem image2_iUnion_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋃ i, s i) t = ⋃ i, image2 f (s i) t := by
simp only [← image_prod, iUnion_prod_const, image_iUnion]
#align set.image2_Union_left Set.image2_iUnion_left
theorem image2_iUnion_right (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, image2 f s (t i) := by
simp only [← image_prod, prod_iUnion, image_iUnion]
#align set.image2_Union_right Set.image2_iUnion_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iUnion₂_left (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t = ⋃ (i) (j), image2 f (s i j) t := by simp_rw [image2_iUnion_left]
#align set.image2_Union₂_left Set.image2_iUnion₂_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iUnion₂_right (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), image2 f s (t i j) := by
simp_rw [image2_iUnion_right]
#align set.image2_Union₂_right Set.image2_iUnion₂_right
theorem image2_iInter_subset_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋂ i, s i) t ⊆ ⋂ i, image2 f (s i) t := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i => mem_image2_of_mem (hx _) hy
#align set.image2_Inter_subset_left Set.image2_iInter_subset_left
theorem image2_iInter_subset_right (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, image2 f s (t i) := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i => mem_image2_of_mem hx (hy _)
#align set.image2_Inter_subset_right Set.image2_iInter_subset_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iInter₂_subset_left (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) t ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), image2 f (s i j) t := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i j => mem_image2_of_mem (hx _ _) hy
#align set.image2_Inter₂_subset_left Set.image2_iInter₂_subset_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iInter₂_subset_right (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), image2 f s (t i j) := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i j => mem_image2_of_mem hx (hy _ _)
#align set.image2_Inter₂_subset_right Set.image2_iInter₂_subset_right
theorem prod_eq_biUnion_left : s ×ˢ t = ⋃ a ∈ s, (fun b => (a, b)) '' t := by
rw [iUnion_image_left, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_bUnion_left Set.prod_eq_biUnion_left
theorem prod_eq_biUnion_right : s ×ˢ t = ⋃ b ∈ t, (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
rw [iUnion_image_right, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_bUnion_right Set.prod_eq_biUnion_right
end Image2
section Seq
theorem seq_def {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} : seq s t = ⋃ f ∈ s, f '' t := by
rw [seq_eq_image2, iUnion_image_left]
#align set.seq_def Set.seq_def
theorem seq_subset {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} {u : Set β} :
seq s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, ∀ a ∈ t, (f : α → β) a ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
#align set.seq_subset Set.seq_subset
@[gcongr]
theorem seq_mono {s₀ s₁ : Set (α → β)} {t₀ t₁ : Set α} (hs : s₀ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₀ ⊆ t₁) :
seq s₀ t₀ ⊆ seq s₁ t₁ := image2_subset hs ht
#align set.seq_mono Set.seq_mono
theorem singleton_seq {f : α → β} {t : Set α} : Set.seq ({f} : Set (α → β)) t = f '' t :=
image2_singleton_left
#align set.singleton_seq Set.singleton_seq
theorem seq_singleton {s : Set (α → β)} {a : α} : Set.seq s {a} = (fun f : α → β => f a) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
#align set.seq_singleton Set.seq_singleton
theorem seq_seq {s : Set (β → γ)} {t : Set (α → β)} {u : Set α} :
seq s (seq t u) = seq (seq ((· ∘ ·) '' s) t) u := by
simp only [seq_eq_image2, image2_image_left]
exact .symm <| image2_assoc fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl
#align set.seq_seq Set.seq_seq
theorem image_seq {f : β → γ} {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} :
f '' seq s t = seq ((f ∘ ·) '' s) t := by
simp only [seq, image_image2, image2_image_left, comp_apply]
#align set.image_seq Set.image_seq
theorem prod_eq_seq {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : s ×ˢ t = (Prod.mk '' s).seq t := by
rw [seq_eq_image2, image2_image_left, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_seq Set.prod_eq_seq
theorem prod_image_seq_comm (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(Prod.mk '' s).seq t = seq ((fun b a => (a, b)) '' t) s := by
rw [← prod_eq_seq, ← image_swap_prod, prod_eq_seq, image_seq, ← image_comp]; rfl
#align set.prod_image_seq_comm Set.prod_image_seq_comm
theorem image2_eq_seq (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = seq (f '' s) t := by
rw [seq_eq_image2, image2_image_left]
#align set.image2_eq_seq Set.image2_eq_seq
end Seq
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
#align set.pi_def Set.pi_def
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
#align set.univ_pi_eq_Inter Set.univ_pi_eq_iInter
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
#align set.pi_diff_pi_subset Set.pi_diff_pi_subset
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
#align set.Union_univ_pi Set.iUnion_univ_pi
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
#align set.directed_on_Union Set.directedOn_iUnion
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-05")]
alias directed_on_iUnion := directedOn_iUnion
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
#align function.surjective.Union_comp Function.Surjective.iUnion_comp
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
#align function.surjective.Inter_comp Function.Surjective.iInter_comp
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t u : Set α} {f : α → β}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
#align set.disjoint_Union_left Set.disjoint_iUnion_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
#align set.disjoint_Union_right Set.disjoint_iUnion_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
#align set.disjoint_Union₂_left Set.disjoint_iUnion₂_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
#align set.disjoint_Union₂_right Set.disjoint_iUnion₂_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
#align set.disjoint_sUnion_left Set.disjoint_sUnion_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
#align set.disjoint_sUnion_right Set.disjoint_sUnion_right
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
#align set.Ici_supr Set.Ici_iSup
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
#align set.Iic_infi Set.Iic_iInf
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
#align set.Ici_supr₂ Set.Ici_iSup₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
#align set.Iic_infi₂ Set.Iic_iInf₂
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 2,151 | 2,151 | theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by | rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.finite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Finite sets
This file defines predicates for finite and infinite sets and provides
`Fintype` instances for many set constructions. It also proves basic facts
about finite sets and gives ways to manipulate `Set.Finite` expressions.
## Main definitions
* `Set.Finite : Set α → Prop`
* `Set.Infinite : Set α → Prop`
* `Set.toFinite` to prove `Set.Finite` for a `Set` from a `Finite` instance.
* `Set.Finite.toFinset` to noncomputably produce a `Finset` from a `Set.Finite` proof.
(See `Set.toFinset` for a computable version.)
## Implementation
A finite set is defined to be a set whose coercion to a type has a `Finite` instance.
There are two components to finiteness constructions. The first is `Fintype` instances for each
construction. This gives a way to actually compute a `Finset` that represents the set, and these
may be accessed using `set.toFinset`. This gets the `Finset` in the correct form, since otherwise
`Finset.univ : Finset s` is a `Finset` for the subtype for `s`. The second component is
"constructors" for `Set.Finite` that give proofs that `Fintype` instances exist classically given
other `Set.Finite` proofs. Unlike the `Fintype` instances, these *do not* use any decidability
instances since they do not compute anything.
## Tags
finite sets
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedRing
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set Function
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace Set
/-- A set is finite if the corresponding `Subtype` is finite,
i.e., if there exists a natural `n : ℕ` and an equivalence `s ≃ Fin n`. -/
protected def Finite (s : Set α) : Prop := Finite s
#align set.finite Set.Finite
-- The `protected` attribute does not take effect within the same namespace block.
end Set
namespace Set
theorem finite_def {s : Set α} : s.Finite ↔ Nonempty (Fintype s) :=
finite_iff_nonempty_fintype s
#align set.finite_def Set.finite_def
protected alias ⟨Finite.nonempty_fintype, _⟩ := finite_def
#align set.finite.nonempty_fintype Set.Finite.nonempty_fintype
theorem finite_coe_iff {s : Set α} : Finite s ↔ s.Finite := .rfl
#align set.finite_coe_iff Set.finite_coe_iff
/-- Constructor for `Set.Finite` using a `Finite` instance. -/
theorem toFinite (s : Set α) [Finite s] : s.Finite := ‹_›
#align set.to_finite Set.toFinite
/-- Construct a `Finite` instance for a `Set` from a `Finset` with the same elements. -/
protected theorem Finite.ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) : p.Finite :=
have := Fintype.ofFinset s H; p.toFinite
#align set.finite.of_finset Set.Finite.ofFinset
/-- Projection of `Set.Finite` to its `Finite` instance.
This is intended to be used with dot notation.
See also `Set.Finite.Fintype` and `Set.Finite.nonempty_fintype`. -/
protected theorem Finite.to_subtype {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Finite s := h
#align set.finite.to_subtype Set.Finite.to_subtype
/-- A finite set coerced to a type is a `Fintype`.
This is the `Fintype` projection for a `Set.Finite`.
Note that because `Finite` isn't a typeclass, this definition will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
protected noncomputable def Finite.fintype {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Fintype s :=
h.nonempty_fintype.some
#align set.finite.fintype Set.Finite.fintype
/-- Using choice, get the `Finset` that represents this `Set`. -/
protected noncomputable def Finite.toFinset {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Finset α :=
@Set.toFinset _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset
theorem Finite.toFinset_eq_toFinset {s : Set α} [Fintype s] (h : s.Finite) :
h.toFinset = s.toFinset := by
-- Porting note: was `rw [Finite.toFinset]; congr`
-- in Lean 4, a goal is left after `congr`
have : h.fintype = ‹_› := Subsingleton.elim _ _
rw [Finite.toFinset, this]
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinite_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : s.toFinite.toFinset = s.toFinset :=
s.toFinite.toFinset_eq_toFinset
#align set.to_finite_to_finset Set.toFinite_toFinset
theorem Finite.exists_finset {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) :
∃ s' : Finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases h.nonempty_fintype
exact ⟨s.toFinset, fun _ => mem_toFinset⟩
#align set.finite.exists_finset Set.Finite.exists_finset
theorem Finite.exists_finset_coe {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : ∃ s' : Finset α, ↑s' = s := by
cases h.nonempty_fintype
exact ⟨s.toFinset, s.coe_toFinset⟩
#align set.finite.exists_finset_coe Set.Finite.exists_finset_coe
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Finset α) (↑) Set.Finite where prf _ hs := hs.exists_finset_coe
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite.
This is protected so that it does not conflict with global `Infinite`. -/
protected def Infinite (s : Set α) : Prop :=
¬s.Finite
#align set.infinite Set.Infinite
@[simp]
theorem not_infinite {s : Set α} : ¬s.Infinite ↔ s.Finite :=
not_not
#align set.not_infinite Set.not_infinite
alias ⟨_, Finite.not_infinite⟩ := not_infinite
#align set.finite.not_infinite Set.Finite.not_infinite
attribute [simp] Finite.not_infinite
/-- See also `finite_or_infinite`, `fintypeOrInfinite`. -/
protected theorem finite_or_infinite (s : Set α) : s.Finite ∨ s.Infinite :=
em _
#align set.finite_or_infinite Set.finite_or_infinite
protected theorem infinite_or_finite (s : Set α) : s.Infinite ∨ s.Finite :=
em' _
#align set.infinite_or_finite Set.infinite_or_finite
/-! ### Basic properties of `Set.Finite.toFinset` -/
namespace Finite
variable {s t : Set α} {a : α} (hs : s.Finite) {ht : t.Finite}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_toFinset : a ∈ hs.toFinset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype _
#align set.finite.mem_to_finset Set.Finite.mem_toFinset
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_toFinset : (hs.toFinset : Set α) = s :=
@coe_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype
#align set.finite.coe_to_finset Set.Finite.coe_toFinset
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_nonempty : hs.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Finset.coe_nonempty, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_nonempty Set.Finite.toFinset_nonempty
/-- Note that this is an equality of types not holding definitionally. Use wisely. -/
theorem coeSort_toFinset : ↥hs.toFinset = ↥s := by
rw [← Finset.coe_sort_coe _, hs.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.coe_sort_to_finset Set.Finite.coeSort_toFinset
/-- The identity map, bundled as an equivalence between the subtypes of `s : Set α` and of
`h.toFinset : Finset α`, where `h` is a proof of finiteness of `s`. -/
@[simps!] def subtypeEquivToFinset : {x // x ∈ s} ≃ {x // x ∈ hs.toFinset} :=
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv fun _ ↦ hs.mem_toFinset.symm
variable {hs}
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_inj : hs.toFinset = ht.toFinset ↔ s = t :=
@toFinset_inj _ _ _ hs.fintype ht.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_inj Set.Finite.toFinset_inj
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_subset {t : Finset α} : hs.toFinset ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_subset Set.Finite.toFinset_subset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_ssubset {t : Finset α} : hs.toFinset ⊂ t ↔ s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_ssubset Set.Finite.toFinset_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem subset_toFinset {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ht.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.subset_to_finset Set.Finite.subset_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_toFinset {s : Finset α} : s ⊂ ht.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.ssubset_to_finset Set.Finite.ssubset_toFinset
@[mono]
protected theorem toFinset_subset_toFinset : hs.toFinset ⊆ ht.toFinset ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_subset_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset
@[mono]
protected theorem toFinset_ssubset_toFinset : hs.toFinset ⊂ ht.toFinset ↔ s ⊂ t := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_ssubset_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
alias ⟨_, toFinset_mono⟩ := Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset
#align set.finite.to_finset_mono Set.Finite.toFinset_mono
alias ⟨_, toFinset_strictMono⟩ := Finite.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
#align set.finite.to_finset_strict_mono Set.Finite.toFinset_strictMono
-- Porting note: attribute [protected] doesn't work
-- attribute [protected] toFinset_mono toFinset_strictMono
-- Porting note: `simp` can simplify LHS but then it simplifies something
-- in the generated `Fintype {x | p x}` instance and fails to apply `Set.toFinset_setOf`
@[simp high]
protected theorem toFinset_setOf [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : { x | p x }.Finite) : h.toFinset = Finset.univ.filter p := by
ext
-- Porting note: `simp` doesn't use the `simp` lemma `Set.toFinset_setOf` without the `_`
simp [Set.toFinset_setOf _]
#align set.finite.to_finset_set_of Set.Finite.toFinset_setOf
@[simp]
nonrec theorem disjoint_toFinset {hs : s.Finite} {ht : t.Finite} :
Disjoint hs.toFinset ht.toFinset ↔ Disjoint s t :=
@disjoint_toFinset _ _ _ hs.fintype ht.fintype
#align set.finite.disjoint_to_finset Set.Finite.disjoint_toFinset
protected theorem toFinset_inter [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∩ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∩ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_inter Set.Finite.toFinset_inter
protected theorem toFinset_union [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∪ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∪ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_union Set.Finite.toFinset_union
protected theorem toFinset_diff [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s \ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset \ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_diff Set.Finite.toFinset_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
protected theorem toFinset_symmDiff [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∆ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∆ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp [mem_symmDiff, Finset.mem_symmDiff]
#align set.finite.to_finset_symm_diff Set.Finite.toFinset_symmDiff
protected theorem toFinset_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (hs : s.Finite) (h : sᶜ.Finite) :
h.toFinset = hs.toFinsetᶜ := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_compl Set.Finite.toFinset_compl
protected theorem toFinset_univ [Fintype α] (h : (Set.univ : Set α).Finite) :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ := by
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_univ Set.Finite.toFinset_univ
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_eq_empty {h : s.Finite} : h.toFinset = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
@toFinset_eq_empty _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_empty Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_empty
protected theorem toFinset_empty (h : (∅ : Set α).Finite) : h.toFinset = ∅ := by
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_empty Set.Finite.toFinset_empty
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_eq_univ [Fintype α] {h : s.Finite} :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ ↔ s = univ :=
@toFinset_eq_univ _ _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_univ Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_univ
protected theorem toFinset_image [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).Finite) :
h.toFinset = hs.toFinset.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_image Set.Finite.toFinset_image
-- Porting note (#10618): now `simp` can prove it but it needs the `fintypeRange` instance
-- from the next section
protected theorem toFinset_range [DecidableEq α] [Fintype β] (f : β → α) (h : (range f).Finite) :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_range Set.Finite.toFinset_range
end Finite
/-! ### Fintype instances
Every instance here should have a corresponding `Set.Finite` constructor in the next section.
-/
section FintypeInstances
instance fintypeUniv [Fintype α] : Fintype (@univ α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv α (Equiv.Set.univ α).symm
#align set.fintype_univ Set.fintypeUniv
/-- If `(Set.univ : Set α)` is finite then `α` is a finite type. -/
noncomputable def fintypeOfFiniteUniv (H : (univ (α := α)).Finite) : Fintype α :=
@Fintype.ofEquiv _ (univ : Set α) H.fintype (Equiv.Set.univ _)
#align set.fintype_of_finite_univ Set.fintypeOfFiniteUniv
instance fintypeUnion [DecidableEq α] (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ∪ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_union Set.fintypeUnion
instance fintypeSep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred p] :
Fintype ({ a ∈ s | p a } : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.filter p) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_sep Set.fintypeSep
instance fintypeInter (s t : Set α) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ∩ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_inter Set.fintypeInter
/-- A `Fintype` instance for set intersection where the left set has a `Fintype` instance. -/
instance fintypeInterOfLeft (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.filter (· ∈ t)) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_inter_of_left Set.fintypeInterOfLeft
/-- A `Fintype` instance for set intersection where the right set has a `Fintype` instance. -/
instance fintypeInterOfRight (s t : Set α) [Fintype t] [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (t.toFinset.filter (· ∈ s)) <| by simp [and_comm]
#align set.fintype_inter_of_right Set.fintypeInterOfRight
/-- A `Fintype` structure on a set defines a `Fintype` structure on its subset. -/
def fintypeSubset (s : Set α) {t : Set α} [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (h : t ⊆ s) :
Fintype t := by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
apply Set.fintypeInterOfLeft
#align set.fintype_subset Set.fintypeSubset
instance fintypeDiff [DecidableEq α] (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s \ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset \ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_diff Set.fintypeDiff
instance fintypeDiffLeft (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
Fintype (s \ t : Set α) :=
Set.fintypeSep s (· ∈ tᶜ)
#align set.fintype_diff_left Set.fintypeDiffLeft
instance fintypeiUnion [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (PLift ι)] (f : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Fintype (f i)] :
Fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.univ.biUnion fun i : PLift ι => (f i.down).toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_Union Set.fintypeiUnion
instance fintypesUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Set (Set α)} [Fintype s]
[H : ∀ t : s, Fintype (t : Set α)] : Fintype (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact @Set.fintypeiUnion _ _ _ _ _ H
#align set.fintype_sUnion Set.fintypesUnion
/-- A union of sets with `Fintype` structure over a set with `Fintype` structure has a `Fintype`
structure. -/
def fintypeBiUnion [DecidableEq α] {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Fintype s] (t : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ s, Fintype (t i)) : Fintype (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
haveI : ∀ i : toFinset s, Fintype (t i) := fun i => H i (mem_toFinset.1 i.2)
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.attach.biUnion fun x => (t x).toFinset) fun x => by simp
#align set.fintype_bUnion Set.fintypeBiUnion
instance fintypeBiUnion' [DecidableEq α] {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Fintype s] (t : ι → Set α)
[∀ i, Fintype (t i)] : Fintype (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.biUnion fun x => (t x).toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_bUnion' Set.fintypeBiUnion'
section monad
attribute [local instance] Set.monad
/-- If `s : Set α` is a set with `Fintype` instance and `f : α → Set β` is a function such that
each `f a`, `a ∈ s`, has a `Fintype` structure, then `s >>= f` has a `Fintype` structure. -/
def fintypeBind {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (f : α → Set β)
(H : ∀ a ∈ s, Fintype (f a)) : Fintype (s >>= f) :=
Set.fintypeBiUnion s f H
#align set.fintype_bind Set.fintypeBind
instance fintypeBind' {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (f : α → Set β)
[∀ a, Fintype (f a)] : Fintype (s >>= f) :=
Set.fintypeBiUnion' s f
#align set.fintype_bind' Set.fintypeBind'
end monad
instance fintypeEmpty : Fintype (∅ : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset ∅ <| by simp
#align set.fintype_empty Set.fintypeEmpty
instance fintypeSingleton (a : α) : Fintype ({a} : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset {a} <| by simp
#align set.fintype_singleton Set.fintypeSingleton
instance fintypePure : ∀ a : α, Fintype (pure a : Set α) :=
Set.fintypeSingleton
#align set.fintype_pure Set.fintypePure
/-- A `Fintype` instance for inserting an element into a `Set` using the
corresponding `insert` function on `Finset`. This requires `DecidableEq α`.
There is also `Set.fintypeInsert'` when `a ∈ s` is decidable. -/
instance fintypeInsert (a : α) (s : Set α) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (insert a s.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_insert Set.fintypeInsert
/-- A `Fintype` structure on `insert a s` when inserting a new element. -/
def fintypeInsertOfNotMem {a : α} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset ⟨a ::ₘ s.toFinset.1, s.toFinset.nodup.cons (by simp [h])⟩ <| by simp
#align set.fintype_insert_of_not_mem Set.fintypeInsertOfNotMem
/-- A `Fintype` structure on `insert a s` when inserting a pre-existing element. -/
def fintypeInsertOfMem {a : α} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (h : a ∈ s) : Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset s.toFinset <| by simp [h]
#align set.fintype_insert_of_mem Set.fintypeInsertOfMem
/-- The `Set.fintypeInsert` instance requires decidable equality, but when `a ∈ s`
is decidable for this particular `a` we can still get a `Fintype` instance by using
`Set.fintypeInsertOfNotMem` or `Set.fintypeInsertOfMem`.
This instance pre-dates `Set.fintypeInsert`, and it is less efficient.
When `Set.decidableMemOfFintype` is made a local instance, then this instance would
override `Set.fintypeInsert` if not for the fact that its priority has been
adjusted. See Note [lower instance priority]. -/
instance (priority := 100) fintypeInsert' (a : α) (s : Set α) [Decidable <| a ∈ s] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then fintypeInsertOfMem s h else fintypeInsertOfNotMem s h
#align set.fintype_insert' Set.fintypeInsert'
instance fintypeImage [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Fintype s] : Fintype (f '' s) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.image f) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_image Set.fintypeImage
/-- If a function `f` has a partial inverse and sends a set `s` to a set with `[Fintype]` instance,
then `s` has a `Fintype` structure as well. -/
def fintypeOfFintypeImage (s : Set α) {f : α → β} {g} (I : IsPartialInv f g) [Fintype (f '' s)] :
Fintype s :=
Fintype.ofFinset ⟨_, (f '' s).toFinset.2.filterMap g <| injective_of_isPartialInv_right I⟩
fun a => by
suffices (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s by
simpa [exists_and_left.symm, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
rw [exists_swap]
suffices (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s by simpa [and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
simp [I _, (injective_of_isPartialInv I).eq_iff]
#align set.fintype_of_fintype_image Set.fintypeOfFintypeImage
instance fintypeRange [DecidableEq α] (f : ι → α) [Fintype (PLift ι)] : Fintype (range f) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.univ.image <| f ∘ PLift.down) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_range Set.fintypeRange
instance fintypeMap {α β} [DecidableEq β] :
∀ (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Fintype s], Fintype (f <$> s) :=
Set.fintypeImage
#align set.fintype_map Set.fintypeMap
instance fintypeLTNat (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i | i < n } :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.range n) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_lt_nat Set.fintypeLTNat
instance fintypeLENat (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i | i ≤ n } := by
simpa [Nat.lt_succ_iff] using Set.fintypeLTNat (n + 1)
#align set.fintype_le_nat Set.fintypeLENat
/-- This is not an instance so that it does not conflict with the one
in `Mathlib/Order/LocallyFinite.lean`. -/
def Nat.fintypeIio (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Iio n) :=
Set.fintypeLTNat n
#align set.nat.fintype_Iio Set.Nat.fintypeIio
instance fintypeProd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ×ˢ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_prod Set.fintypeProd
instance fintypeOffDiag [DecidableEq α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype s.offDiag :=
Fintype.ofFinset s.toFinset.offDiag <| by simp
#align set.fintype_off_diag Set.fintypeOffDiag
/-- `image2 f s t` is `Fintype` if `s` and `t` are. -/
instance fintypeImage2 [DecidableEq γ] (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [hs : Fintype s]
[ht : Fintype t] : Fintype (image2 f s t : Set γ) := by
rw [← image_prod]
apply Set.fintypeImage
#align set.fintype_image2 Set.fintypeImage2
instance fintypeSeq [DecidableEq β] (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Fintype f] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (f.seq s) := by
rw [seq_def]
apply Set.fintypeBiUnion'
#align set.fintype_seq Set.fintypeSeq
instance fintypeSeq' {α β : Type u} [DecidableEq β] (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Fintype f]
[Fintype s] : Fintype (f <*> s) :=
Set.fintypeSeq f s
#align set.fintype_seq' Set.fintypeSeq'
instance fintypeMemFinset (s : Finset α) : Fintype { a | a ∈ s } :=
Finset.fintypeCoeSort s
#align set.fintype_mem_finset Set.fintypeMemFinset
end FintypeInstances
end Set
theorem Equiv.set_finite_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hst : s ≃ t) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
simp_rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, hst.finite_iff]
#align equiv.set_finite_iff Equiv.set_finite_iff
/-! ### Finset -/
namespace Finset
/-- Gives a `Set.Finite` for the `Finset` coerced to a `Set`.
This is a wrapper around `Set.toFinite`. -/
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
#align finset.finite_to_set Finset.finite_toSet
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], now `simp` can prove it
theorem finite_toSet_toFinset (s : Finset α) : s.finite_toSet.toFinset = s := by
rw [toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_coe]
#align finset.finite_to_set_to_finset Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset
end Finset
namespace Multiset
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet (s : Multiset α) : { x | x ∈ s }.Finite := by
classical simpa only [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] using s.toFinset.finite_toSet
#align multiset.finite_to_set Multiset.finite_toSet
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.finite_toSet.toFinset = s.toFinset := by
ext x
simp
#align multiset.finite_to_set_to_finset Multiset.finite_toSet_toFinset
end Multiset
@[simp]
theorem List.finite_toSet (l : List α) : { x | x ∈ l }.Finite :=
(show Multiset α from ⟦l⟧).finite_toSet
#align list.finite_to_set List.finite_toSet
/-! ### Finite instances
There is seemingly some overlap between the following instances and the `Fintype` instances
in `Data.Set.Finite`. While every `Fintype` instance gives a `Finite` instance, those
instances that depend on `Fintype` or `Decidable` instances need an additional `Finite` instance
to be able to generally apply.
Some set instances do not appear here since they are consequences of others, for example
`Subtype.Finite` for subsets of a finite type.
-/
namespace Finite.Set
open scoped Classical
example {s : Set α} [Finite α] : Finite s :=
inferInstance
example : Finite (∅ : Set α) :=
inferInstance
example (a : α) : Finite ({a} : Set α) :=
inferInstance
instance finite_union (s t : Set α) [Finite s] [Finite t] : Finite (s ∪ t : Set α) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
cases nonempty_fintype t
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_union Finite.Set.finite_union
instance finite_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) [Finite s] : Finite ({ a ∈ s | p a } : Set α) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_sep Finite.Set.finite_sep
protected theorem subset (s : Set α) {t : Set α} [Finite s] (h : t ⊆ s) : Finite t := by
rw [← sep_eq_of_subset h]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.subset Finite.Set.subset
instance finite_inter_of_right (s t : Set α) [Finite t] : Finite (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset t inter_subset_right
#align finite.set.finite_inter_of_right Finite.Set.finite_inter_of_right
instance finite_inter_of_left (s t : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset s inter_subset_left
#align finite.set.finite_inter_of_left Finite.Set.finite_inter_of_left
instance finite_diff (s t : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (s \ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset s diff_subset
#align finite.set.finite_diff Finite.Set.finite_diff
instance finite_range (f : ι → α) [Finite ι] : Finite (range f) := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite (PLift ι)
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_range Finite.Set.finite_range
instance finite_iUnion [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (f i)] : Finite (⋃ i, f i) := by
rw [iUnion_eq_range_psigma]
apply Set.finite_range
#align finite.set.finite_Union Finite.Set.finite_iUnion
instance finite_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} [Finite s] [H : ∀ t : s, Finite (t : Set α)] :
Finite (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact @Finite.Set.finite_iUnion _ _ _ _ H
#align finite.set.finite_sUnion Finite.Set.finite_sUnion
theorem finite_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Finite s] (t : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ s, Finite (t i)) : Finite (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
haveI : ∀ i : s, Finite (t i) := fun i => H i i.property
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion Finite.Set.finite_biUnion
instance finite_biUnion' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Finite s] (t : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (t i)] :
Finite (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
finite_biUnion s t fun _ _ => inferInstance
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion' Finite.Set.finite_biUnion'
/-- Example: `Finite (⋃ (i < n), f i)` where `f : ℕ → Set α` and `[∀ i, Finite (f i)]`
(when given instances from `Order.Interval.Finset.Nat`).
-/
instance finite_biUnion'' {ι : Type*} (p : ι → Prop) [h : Finite { x | p x }] (t : ι → Set α)
[∀ i, Finite (t i)] : Finite (⋃ (x) (_ : p x), t x) :=
@Finite.Set.finite_biUnion' _ _ (setOf p) h t _
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion'' Finite.Set.finite_biUnion''
instance finite_iInter {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (t i)] :
Finite (⋂ i, t i) :=
Finite.Set.subset (t <| Classical.arbitrary ι) (iInter_subset _ _)
#align finite.set.finite_Inter Finite.Set.finite_iInter
instance finite_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (insert a s : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.finite_union {a} s
#align finite.set.finite_insert Finite.Set.finite_insert
instance finite_image (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Finite s] : Finite (f '' s) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_image Finite.Set.finite_image
instance finite_replacement [Finite α] (f : α → β) :
Finite {f x | x : α} :=
Finite.Set.finite_range f
#align finite.set.finite_replacement Finite.Set.finite_replacement
instance finite_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Finite s] [Finite t] :
Finite (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) :=
Finite.of_equiv _ (Equiv.Set.prod s t).symm
#align finite.set.finite_prod Finite.Set.finite_prod
instance finite_image2 (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Finite s] [Finite t] :
Finite (image2 f s t : Set γ) := by
rw [← image_prod]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_image2 Finite.Set.finite_image2
instance finite_seq (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Finite f] [Finite s] : Finite (f.seq s) := by
rw [seq_def]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_seq Finite.Set.finite_seq
end Finite.Set
namespace Set
/-! ### Constructors for `Set.Finite`
Every constructor here should have a corresponding `Fintype` instance in the previous section
(or in the `Fintype` module).
The implementation of these constructors ideally should be no more than `Set.toFinite`,
after possibly setting up some `Fintype` and classical `Decidable` instances.
-/
section SetFiniteConstructors
@[nontriviality]
theorem Finite.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (s : Set α) : s.Finite :=
s.toFinite
#align set.finite.of_subsingleton Set.Finite.of_subsingleton
theorem finite_univ [Finite α] : (@univ α).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
#align set.finite_univ Set.finite_univ
theorem finite_univ_iff : (@univ α).Finite ↔ Finite α := (Equiv.Set.univ α).finite_iff
#align set.finite_univ_iff Set.finite_univ_iff
alias ⟨_root_.Finite.of_finite_univ, _⟩ := finite_univ_iff
#align finite.of_finite_univ Finite.of_finite_univ
theorem Finite.subset {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {t : Set α} (ht : t ⊆ s) : t.Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
exact Finite.Set.subset _ ht
#align set.finite.subset Set.Finite.subset
theorem Finite.union {s t : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : (s ∪ t).Finite := by
rw [Set.Finite] at hs ht
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.union Set.Finite.union
theorem Finite.finite_of_compl {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (hsc : sᶜ.Finite) : Finite α := by
rw [← finite_univ_iff, ← union_compl_self s]
exact hs.union hsc
#align set.finite.finite_of_compl Set.Finite.finite_of_compl
theorem Finite.sup {s t : Set α} : s.Finite → t.Finite → (s ⊔ t).Finite :=
Finite.union
#align set.finite.sup Set.Finite.sup
theorem Finite.sep {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (p : α → Prop) : { a ∈ s | p a }.Finite :=
hs.subset <| sep_subset _ _
#align set.finite.sep Set.Finite.sep
theorem Finite.inter_of_left {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s ∩ t).Finite :=
hs.subset inter_subset_left
#align set.finite.inter_of_left Set.Finite.inter_of_left
theorem Finite.inter_of_right {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (t ∩ s).Finite :=
hs.subset inter_subset_right
#align set.finite.inter_of_right Set.Finite.inter_of_right
theorem Finite.inf_of_left {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s ⊓ t).Finite :=
h.inter_of_left t
#align set.finite.inf_of_left Set.Finite.inf_of_left
theorem Finite.inf_of_right {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (t ⊓ s).Finite :=
h.inter_of_right t
#align set.finite.inf_of_right Set.Finite.inf_of_right
protected lemma Infinite.mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s.Infinite → t.Infinite :=
mt fun ht ↦ ht.subset h
#align set.infinite.mono Set.Infinite.mono
theorem Finite.diff {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s \ t).Finite :=
hs.subset diff_subset
#align set.finite.diff Set.Finite.diff
theorem Finite.of_diff {s t : Set α} (hd : (s \ t).Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : s.Finite :=
(hd.union ht).subset <| subset_diff_union _ _
#align set.finite.of_diff Set.Finite.of_diff
theorem finite_iUnion [Finite ι] {f : ι → Set α} (H : ∀ i, (f i).Finite) : (⋃ i, f i).Finite :=
haveI := fun i => (H i).to_subtype
toFinite _
#align set.finite_Union Set.finite_iUnion
/-- Dependent version of `Finite.biUnion`. -/
theorem Finite.biUnion' {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) {t : ∀ i ∈ s, Set α}
(ht : ∀ i (hi : i ∈ s), (t i hi).Finite) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i ‹_›).Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply finite_iUnion fun i : s => ht i.1 i.2
#align set.finite.bUnion' Set.Finite.biUnion'
theorem Finite.biUnion {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) {t : ι → Set α}
(ht : ∀ i ∈ s, (t i).Finite) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i).Finite :=
hs.biUnion' ht
#align set.finite.bUnion Set.Finite.biUnion
theorem Finite.sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Finite) (H : ∀ t ∈ s, Set.Finite t) :
(⋃₀ s).Finite := by
simpa only [sUnion_eq_biUnion] using hs.biUnion H
#align set.finite.sUnion Set.Finite.sUnion
theorem Finite.sInter {α : Type*} {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (ht : t ∈ s) (hf : t.Finite) :
(⋂₀ s).Finite :=
hf.subset (sInter_subset_of_mem ht)
#align set.finite.sInter Set.Finite.sInter
/-- If sets `s i` are finite for all `i` from a finite set `t` and are empty for `i ∉ t`, then the
union `⋃ i, s i` is a finite set. -/
theorem Finite.iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Finite)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ t, (s i).Finite) (he : ∀ i, i ∉ t → s i = ∅) : (⋃ i, s i).Finite := by
suffices ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, s i by exact (ht.biUnion hs).subset this
refine iUnion_subset fun i x hx => ?_
by_cases hi : i ∈ t
· exact mem_biUnion hi hx
· rw [he i hi, mem_empty_iff_false] at hx
contradiction
#align set.finite.Union Set.Finite.iUnion
section monad
attribute [local instance] Set.monad
theorem Finite.bind {α β} {s : Set α} {f : α → Set β} (h : s.Finite) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, (f a).Finite) :
(s >>= f).Finite :=
h.biUnion hf
#align set.finite.bind Set.Finite.bind
end monad
@[simp]
theorem finite_empty : (∅ : Set α).Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_empty Set.finite_empty
protected theorem Infinite.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 <| by
rintro rfl
exact h finite_empty
#align set.infinite.nonempty Set.Infinite.nonempty
@[simp]
theorem finite_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_singleton Set.finite_singleton
theorem finite_pure (a : α) : (pure a : Set α).Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_pure Set.finite_pure
@[simp]
protected theorem Finite.insert (a : α) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : (insert a s).Finite :=
(finite_singleton a).union hs
#align set.finite.insert Set.Finite.insert
theorem Finite.image {s : Set α} (f : α → β) (hs : s.Finite) : (f '' s).Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.image Set.Finite.image
theorem finite_range (f : ι → α) [Finite ι] : (range f).Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_range Set.finite_range
lemma Finite.of_surjOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (f : α → β) (hf : SurjOn f s t) (hs : s.Finite) :
t.Finite := (hs.image _).subset hf
theorem Finite.dependent_image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (F : ∀ i ∈ s, β) :
{y : β | ∃ x hx, F x hx = y}.Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
simpa [range] using finite_range fun x : s => F x x.2
#align set.finite.dependent_image Set.Finite.dependent_image
theorem Finite.map {α β} {s : Set α} : ∀ f : α → β, s.Finite → (f <$> s).Finite :=
Finite.image
#align set.finite.map Set.Finite.map
theorem Finite.of_finite_image {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h : (f '' s).Finite) (hi : Set.InjOn f s) :
s.Finite :=
have := h.to_subtype
.of_injective _ hi.bijOn_image.bijective.injective
#align set.finite.of_finite_image Set.Finite.of_finite_image
section preimage
variable {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
theorem finite_of_finite_preimage (h : (f ⁻¹' s).Finite) (hs : s ⊆ range f) : s.Finite := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_of_subset hs]
exact Finite.image f h
#align set.finite_of_finite_preimage Set.finite_of_finite_preimage
theorem Finite.of_preimage (h : (f ⁻¹' s).Finite) (hf : Surjective f) : s.Finite :=
hf.image_preimage s ▸ h.image _
#align set.finite.of_preimage Set.Finite.of_preimage
theorem Finite.preimage (I : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) (h : s.Finite) : (f ⁻¹' s).Finite :=
(h.subset (image_preimage_subset f s)).of_finite_image I
#align set.finite.preimage Set.Finite.preimage
protected lemma Infinite.preimage (hs : s.Infinite) (hf : s ⊆ range f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Infinite :=
fun h ↦ hs <| finite_of_finite_preimage h hf
lemma Infinite.preimage' (hs : (s ∩ range f).Infinite) : (f ⁻¹' s).Infinite :=
(hs.preimage inter_subset_right).mono <| preimage_mono inter_subset_left
theorem Finite.preimage_embedding {s : Set β} (f : α ↪ β) (h : s.Finite) : (f ⁻¹' s).Finite :=
h.preimage fun _ _ _ _ h' => f.injective h'
#align set.finite.preimage_embedding Set.Finite.preimage_embedding
end preimage
theorem finite_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : Set.Finite { i | i < n } :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_lt_nat Set.finite_lt_nat
theorem finite_le_nat (n : ℕ) : Set.Finite { i | i ≤ n } :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_le_nat Set.finite_le_nat
section MapsTo
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → α} (hs : s.Finite) (hm : MapsTo f s s)
theorem Finite.surjOn_iff_bijOn_of_mapsTo : SurjOn f s s ↔ BijOn f s s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨hm, ?_, h⟩, BijOn.surjOn⟩
have : Finite s := finite_coe_iff.mpr hs
exact hm.restrict_inj.mp (Finite.injective_iff_surjective.mpr <| hm.restrict_surjective_iff.mpr h)
theorem Finite.injOn_iff_bijOn_of_mapsTo : InjOn f s ↔ BijOn f s s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨hm, h, ?_⟩, BijOn.injOn⟩
have : Finite s := finite_coe_iff.mpr hs
exact hm.restrict_surjective_iff.mp (Finite.injective_iff_surjective.mp <| hm.restrict_inj.mpr h)
end MapsTo
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
protected theorem Finite.prod (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
have := ht.to_subtype
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.prod Set.Finite.prod
theorem Finite.of_prod_left (h : (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).Finite) : t.Nonempty → s.Finite :=
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => (h.image Prod.fst).subset fun a ha => ⟨(a, b), ⟨ha, hb⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.finite.of_prod_left Set.Finite.of_prod_left
theorem Finite.of_prod_right (h : (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).Finite) : s.Nonempty → t.Finite :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (h.image Prod.snd).subset fun b hb => ⟨(a, b), ⟨ha, hb⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.finite.of_prod_right Set.Finite.of_prod_right
protected theorem Infinite.prod_left (hs : s.Infinite) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).Infinite :=
fun h => hs <| h.of_prod_left ht
#align set.infinite.prod_left Set.Infinite.prod_left
protected theorem Infinite.prod_right (ht : t.Infinite) (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).Infinite :=
fun h => ht <| h.of_prod_right hs
#align set.infinite.prod_right Set.Infinite.prod_right
protected theorem infinite_prod :
(s ×ˢ t).Infinite ↔ s.Infinite ∧ t.Nonempty ∨ t.Infinite ∧ s.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [Set.Infinite, @and_comm ¬_, ← Classical.not_imp]
by_contra!
exact h ((this.1 h.nonempty.snd).prod <| this.2 h.nonempty.fst)
· rintro (h | h)
· exact h.1.prod_left h.2
· exact h.1.prod_right h.2
#align set.infinite_prod Set.infinite_prod
theorem finite_prod : (s ×ˢ t).Finite ↔ (s.Finite ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (t.Finite ∨ s = ∅) := by
simp only [← not_infinite, Set.infinite_prod, not_or, not_and_or, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
#align set.finite_prod Set.finite_prod
protected theorem Finite.offDiag {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : s.offDiag.Finite :=
(hs.prod hs).subset s.offDiag_subset_prod
#align set.finite.off_diag Set.Finite.offDiag
protected theorem Finite.image2 (f : α → β → γ) (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
(image2 f s t).Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
have := ht.to_subtype
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.image2 Set.Finite.image2
end Prod
theorem Finite.seq {f : Set (α → β)} {s : Set α} (hf : f.Finite) (hs : s.Finite) :
(f.seq s).Finite :=
hf.image2 _ hs
#align set.finite.seq Set.Finite.seq
theorem Finite.seq' {α β : Type u} {f : Set (α → β)} {s : Set α} (hf : f.Finite) (hs : s.Finite) :
(f <*> s).Finite :=
hf.seq hs
#align set.finite.seq' Set.Finite.seq'
theorem finite_mem_finset (s : Finset α) : { a | a ∈ s }.Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_mem_finset Set.finite_mem_finset
theorem Subsingleton.finite {s : Set α} (h : s.Subsingleton) : s.Finite :=
h.induction_on finite_empty finite_singleton
#align set.subsingleton.finite Set.Subsingleton.finite
theorem Infinite.nontrivial {s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) : s.Nontrivial :=
not_subsingleton_iff.1 <| mt Subsingleton.finite hs
theorem finite_preimage_inl_and_inr {s : Set (Sum α β)} :
(Sum.inl ⁻¹' s).Finite ∧ (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s).Finite ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h => image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr s ▸ (h.1.image _).union (h.2.image _),
fun h => ⟨h.preimage Sum.inl_injective.injOn, h.preimage Sum.inr_injective.injOn⟩⟩
#align set.finite_preimage_inl_and_inr Set.finite_preimage_inl_and_inr
theorem exists_finite_iff_finset {p : Set α → Prop} :
(∃ s : Set α, s.Finite ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s : Finset α, p ↑s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hs, hps⟩ => ⟨hs.toFinset, hs.coe_toFinset.symm ▸ hps⟩, fun ⟨s, hs⟩ =>
⟨s, s.finite_toSet, hs⟩⟩
#align set.exists_finite_iff_finset Set.exists_finite_iff_finset
/-- There are finitely many subsets of a given finite set -/
theorem Finite.finite_subsets {α : Type u} {a : Set α} (h : a.Finite) : { b | b ⊆ a }.Finite := by
convert ((Finset.powerset h.toFinset).map Finset.coeEmb.1).finite_toSet
ext s
simpa [← @exists_finite_iff_finset α fun t => t ⊆ a ∧ t = s, Finite.subset_toFinset,
← and_assoc, Finset.coeEmb] using h.subset
#align set.finite.finite_subsets Set.Finite.finite_subsets
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {κ : ι → Type*} {t : ∀ i, Set (κ i)}
/-- Finite product of finite sets is finite -/
theorem Finite.pi (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Finite) : (pi univ t).Finite := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
lift t to ∀ d, Finset (κ d) using ht
classical
rw [← Fintype.coe_piFinset]
apply Finset.finite_toSet
#align set.finite.pi Set.Finite.pi
/-- Finite product of finite sets is finite. Note this is a variant of `Set.Finite.pi` without the
extra `i ∈ univ` binder. -/
lemma Finite.pi' (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Finite) : {f : ∀ i, κ i | ∀ i, f i ∈ t i}.Finite := by
simpa [Set.pi] using Finite.pi ht
end Pi
/-- A finite union of finsets is finite. -/
theorem union_finset_finite_of_range_finite (f : α → Finset β) (h : (range f).Finite) :
(⋃ a, (f a : Set β)).Finite := by
rw [← biUnion_range]
exact h.biUnion fun y _ => y.finite_toSet
#align set.union_finset_finite_of_range_finite Set.union_finset_finite_of_range_finite
theorem finite_range_ite {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} (hf : (range f).Finite)
(hg : (range g).Finite) : (range fun x => if p x then f x else g x).Finite :=
(hf.union hg).subset range_ite_subset
#align set.finite_range_ite Set.finite_range_ite
theorem finite_range_const {c : β} : (range fun _ : α => c).Finite :=
(finite_singleton c).subset range_const_subset
#align set.finite_range_const Set.finite_range_const
end SetFiniteConstructors
/-! ### Properties -/
instance Finite.inhabited : Inhabited { s : Set α // s.Finite } :=
⟨⟨∅, finite_empty⟩⟩
#align set.finite.inhabited Set.Finite.inhabited
@[simp]
theorem finite_union {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t).Finite ↔ s.Finite ∧ t.Finite :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.subset subset_union_left, h.subset subset_union_right⟩, fun ⟨hs, ht⟩ =>
hs.union ht⟩
#align set.finite_union Set.finite_union
theorem finite_image_iff {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hi : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).Finite ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h => h.of_finite_image hi, Finite.image _⟩
#align set.finite_image_iff Set.finite_image_iff
theorem univ_finite_iff_nonempty_fintype : (univ : Set α).Finite ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fintypeOfFiniteUniv h⟩, fun ⟨_i⟩ => finite_univ⟩
#align set.univ_finite_iff_nonempty_fintype Set.univ_finite_iff_nonempty_fintype
-- Porting note: moved `@[simp]` to `Set.toFinset_singleton` because `simp` can now simplify LHS
theorem Finite.toFinset_singleton {a : α} (ha : ({a} : Set α).Finite := finite_singleton _) :
ha.toFinset = {a} :=
Set.toFinite_toFinset _
#align set.finite.to_finset_singleton Set.Finite.toFinset_singleton
@[simp]
theorem Finite.toFinset_insert [DecidableEq α] {s : Set α} {a : α} (hs : (insert a s).Finite) :
hs.toFinset = insert a (hs.subset <| subset_insert _ _).toFinset :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_insert Set.Finite.toFinset_insert
theorem Finite.toFinset_insert' [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(hs.insert a).toFinset = insert a hs.toFinset :=
Finite.toFinset_insert _
#align set.finite.to_finset_insert' Set.Finite.toFinset_insert'
theorem Finite.toFinset_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
hs.toFinset ×ˢ ht.toFinset = (hs.prod ht).toFinset :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_prod Set.Finite.toFinset_prod
theorem Finite.toFinset_offDiag {s : Set α} [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) :
hs.offDiag.toFinset = hs.toFinset.offDiag :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_off_diag Set.Finite.toFinset_offDiag
theorem Finite.fin_embedding {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (f : Fin n ↪ α), range f = s :=
⟨_, (Fintype.equivFin (h.toFinset : Set α)).symm.asEmbedding, by
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, Equiv.asEmbedding_range, Finite.coe_toFinset, setOf_mem_eq]⟩
#align set.finite.fin_embedding Set.Finite.fin_embedding
theorem Finite.fin_param {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (f : Fin n → α), Injective f ∧ range f = s :=
let ⟨n, f, hf⟩ := h.fin_embedding
⟨n, f, f.injective, hf⟩
#align set.finite.fin_param Set.Finite.fin_param
theorem finite_option {s : Set (Option α)} : s.Finite ↔ { x : α | some x ∈ s }.Finite :=
⟨fun h => h.preimage_embedding Embedding.some, fun h =>
((h.image some).insert none).subset fun x =>
x.casesOn (fun _ => Or.inl rfl) fun _ hx => Or.inr <| mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
#align set.finite_option Set.finite_option
theorem finite_image_fst_and_snd_iff {s : Set (α × β)} :
(Prod.fst '' s).Finite ∧ (Prod.snd '' s).Finite ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h => (h.1.prod h.2).subset fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h, mem_image_of_mem _ h⟩,
fun h => ⟨h.image _, h.image _⟩⟩
#align set.finite_image_fst_and_snd_iff Set.finite_image_fst_and_snd_iff
theorem forall_finite_image_eval_iff {δ : Type*} [Finite δ] {κ : δ → Type*} {s : Set (∀ d, κ d)} :
(∀ d, (eval d '' s).Finite) ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h => (Finite.pi h).subset <| subset_pi_eval_image _ _, fun h _ => h.image _⟩
#align set.forall_finite_image_eval_iff Set.forall_finite_image_eval_iff
theorem finite_subset_iUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i) :
∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i := by
have := hs.to_subtype
choose f hf using show ∀ x : s, ∃ i, x.1 ∈ t i by simpa [subset_def] using h
refine ⟨range f, finite_range f, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_range, mem_iUnion]
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, hf _⟩
#align set.finite_subset_Union Set.finite_subset_iUnion
theorem eq_finite_iUnion_of_finite_subset_iUnion {ι} {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (tfin : t.Finite)
(h : t ⊆ ⋃ i, s i) :
∃ I : Set ι,
I.Finite ∧
∃ σ : { i | i ∈ I } → Set α, (∀ i, (σ i).Finite) ∧ (∀ i, σ i ⊆ s i) ∧ t = ⋃ i, σ i :=
let ⟨I, Ifin, hI⟩ := finite_subset_iUnion tfin h
⟨I, Ifin, fun x => s x ∩ t, fun i => tfin.subset inter_subset_right, fun i =>
inter_subset_left, by
ext x
rw [mem_iUnion]
constructor
· intro x_in
rcases mem_iUnion.mp (hI x_in) with ⟨i, _, ⟨hi, rfl⟩, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨H, x_in⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨i, -, H⟩
exact H⟩
#align set.eq_finite_Union_of_finite_subset_Union Set.eq_finite_iUnion_of_finite_subset_iUnion
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Finite.induction_on {C : Set α → Prop} {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) (H0 : C ∅)
(H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → Set.Finite s → C s → C (insert a s)) : C s := by
lift s to Finset α using h
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha hs
· rwa [Finset.coe_empty]
· rw [Finset.coe_cons]
exact @H1 a s ha (Set.toFinite _) hs
#align set.finite.induction_on Set.Finite.induction_on
/-- Analogous to `Finset.induction_on'`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Finite.induction_on' {C : Set α → Prop} {S : Set α} (h : S.Finite) (H0 : C ∅)
(H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → a ∉ s → C s → C (insert a s)) : C S := by
refine @Set.Finite.induction_on α (fun s => s ⊆ S → C s) S h (fun _ => H0) ?_ Subset.rfl
intro a s has _ hCs haS
rw [insert_subset_iff] at haS
exact H1 haS.1 haS.2 has (hCs haS.2)
#align set.finite.induction_on' Set.Finite.induction_on'
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Finite.dinduction_on {C : ∀ s : Set α, s.Finite → Prop} (s : Set α) (h : s.Finite)
(H0 : C ∅ finite_empty)
(H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → ∀ h : Set.Finite s, C s h → C (insert a s) (h.insert a)) : C s h :=
have : ∀ h : s.Finite, C s h :=
Finite.induction_on h (fun _ => H0) fun has hs ih _ => H1 has hs (ih _)
this h
#align set.finite.dinduction_on Set.Finite.dinduction_on
/-- Induction up to a finite set `S`. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Finite.lean | 1,208 | 1,217 | theorem Finite.induction_to {C : Set α → Prop} {S : Set α} (h : S.Finite)
(S0 : Set α) (hS0 : S0 ⊆ S) (H0 : C S0) (H1 : ∀ s ⊂ S, C s → ∃ a ∈ S \ s, C (insert a s)) :
C S := by |
have : Finite S := Finite.to_subtype h
have : Finite {T : Set α // T ⊆ S} := Finite.of_equiv (Set S) (Equiv.Set.powerset S).symm
rw [← Subtype.coe_mk (p := (· ⊆ S)) _ le_rfl]
rw [← Subtype.coe_mk (p := (· ⊆ S)) _ hS0] at H0
refine Finite.to_wellFoundedGT.wf.induction_bot' (fun s hs hs' ↦ ?_) H0
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha1, ha2⟩, ha'⟩ := H1 s (ssubset_of_ne_of_subset hs s.2) hs'
exact ⟨⟨insert a s.1, insert_subset ha1 s.2⟩, Set.ssubset_insert ha2, ha'⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Instances
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.list.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists Set.range
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
-- Porting note: Delete this attribute
-- attribute [inline] List.head!
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
#align list.unique_of_is_empty List.uniqueOfIsEmpty
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
#align list.cons_ne_nil List.cons_ne_nil
#align list.cons_ne_self List.cons_ne_self
#align list.head_eq_of_cons_eq List.head_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
#align list.tail_eq_of_cons_eq List.tail_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
#align list.cons_injective List.cons_injective
#align list.cons_inj List.cons_inj
#align list.cons_eq_cons List.cons_eq_cons
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
#align list.singleton_injective List.singleton_injective
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align list.singleton_inj List.singleton_inj
#align list.exists_cons_of_ne_nil List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
#align list.set_of_mem_cons List.set_of_mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
#align list.mem_singleton_self List.mem_singleton_self
#align list.eq_of_mem_singleton List.eq_of_mem_singleton
#align list.mem_singleton List.mem_singleton
#align list.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem List.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
#align decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.not_mem_append List.not_mem_append
#align list.ne_nil_of_mem List.ne_nil_of_mem
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias mem_split := append_of_mem
#align list.mem_split List.append_of_mem
#align list.mem_of_ne_of_mem List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
#align list.ne_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem List.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem
#align list.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.mem_map List.mem_map
#align list.exists_of_mem_map List.exists_of_mem_map
#align list.mem_map_of_mem List.mem_map_of_memₓ -- implicits order
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
#align list.mem_map_of_injective List.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
#align function.involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
#align list.mem_map_of_involutive List.mem_map_of_involutive
#align list.forall_mem_map_iff List.forall_mem_map_iffₓ -- universe order
#align list.map_eq_nil List.map_eq_nilₓ -- universe order
attribute [simp] List.mem_join
#align list.mem_join List.mem_join
#align list.exists_of_mem_join List.exists_of_mem_join
#align list.mem_join_of_mem List.mem_join_of_memₓ -- implicits order
attribute [simp] List.mem_bind
#align list.mem_bind List.mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3, And in Lean4
#align list.exists_of_mem_bind List.exists_of_mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
#align list.mem_bind_of_mem List.mem_bind_of_memₓ -- implicits order
#align list.bind_map List.bind_mapₓ -- implicits order
theorem map_bind (g : β → List γ) (f : α → β) :
∀ l : List α, (List.map f l).bind g = l.bind fun a => g (f a)
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by simp only [cons_bind, map_cons, map_bind _ _ l]
#align list.map_bind List.map_bind
/-! ### length -/
#align list.length_eq_zero List.length_eq_zero
#align list.length_singleton List.length_singleton
#align list.length_pos_of_mem List.length_pos_of_mem
#align list.exists_mem_of_length_pos List.exists_mem_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_iff_exists_mem List.length_pos_iff_exists_mem
alias ⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos
#align list.ne_nil_of_length_pos List.ne_nil_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_of_ne_nil List.length_pos_of_ne_nil
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
#align list.length_pos_iff_ne_nil List.length_pos_iff_ne_nil
#align list.exists_mem_of_ne_nil List.exists_mem_of_ne_nil
#align list.length_eq_one List.length_eq_one
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
#align list.exists_of_length_succ List.exists_of_length_succ
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· apply ih; simpa using hl
#align list.length_injective_iff List.length_injective_iff
@[simp default+1] -- Porting note: this used to be just @[simp]
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
#align list.length_injective List.length_injective
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_two List.length_eq_two
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_three List.length_eq_three
#align list.sublist.length_le List.Sublist.length_le
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
#align list.has_singleton List.instSingletonList
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_emptyc_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg (not_mem_nil _) }
#align list.empty_eq List.empty_eq
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
#align list.singleton_eq List.singleton_eq
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
#align list.insert_neg List.insert_neg
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
#align list.insert_pos List.insert_pos
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
#align list.doubleton_eq List.doubleton_eq
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
#align list.forall_mem_nil List.forall_mem_nil
#align list.forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
#align list.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons
#align list.forall_mem_singleton List.forall_mem_singleton
#align list.forall_mem_append List.forall_mem_append
#align list.not_exists_mem_nil List.not_exists_mem_nilₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of List.exists_mem_cons_ofₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of_exists List.exists_mem_cons_of_existsₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
#align list.or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons List.or_exists_of_exists_mem_consₓ -- bExists change
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
#align list.exists_mem_cons_iff List.exists_mem_cons_iff
/-! ### list subset -/
instance : IsTrans (List α) Subset where
trans := fun _ _ _ => List.Subset.trans
#align list.subset_def List.subset_def
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_left List.subset_append_of_subset_left
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_right List.subset_append_of_subset_right
#align list.cons_subset List.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
#align list.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem List.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
#align list.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset List.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.append_subset_iff List.append_subset
alias ⟨eq_nil_of_subset_nil, _⟩ := subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_of_subset_nil List.eq_nil_of_subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem
#align list.map_subset List.map_subset
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
#align list.map_subset_iff List.map_subset_iff
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
#align list.append_eq_has_append List.append_eq_has_append
#align list.singleton_append List.singleton_append
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right
#align list.append_eq_nil List.append_eq_nil
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.nil_eq_append_iff List.nil_eq_append
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias append_eq_cons_iff := append_eq_cons
#align list.append_eq_cons_iff List.append_eq_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias cons_eq_append_iff := cons_eq_append
#align list.cons_eq_append_iff List.cons_eq_append
#align list.append_eq_append_iff List.append_eq_append_iff
#align list.take_append_drop List.take_append_drop
#align list.append_inj List.append_inj
#align list.append_inj_right List.append_inj_rightₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left List.append_inj_leftₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj' List.append_inj'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_right' List.append_inj_right'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left' List.append_inj_left'ₓ -- implicits order
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_left_cancel := append_cancel_left
#align list.append_left_cancel List.append_cancel_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_right_cancel := append_cancel_right
#align list.append_right_cancel List.append_cancel_right
@[simp] theorem append_left_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [← append_left_inj (s₁ := x), nil_append]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_left {x y : List α} : y = x ++ y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_left_eq_self]
@[simp] theorem append_right_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = x ↔ y = [] := by
rw [← append_right_inj (t₁ := y), append_nil]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_right {x y : List α} : x = x ++ y ↔ y = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_right_eq_self]
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
#align list.append_right_injective List.append_right_injective
#align list.append_right_inj List.append_right_inj
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
#align list.append_left_injective List.append_left_injective
#align list.append_left_inj List.append_left_inj
#align list.map_eq_append_split List.map_eq_append_split
/-! ### replicate -/
@[simp] lemma replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = [] := rfl
#align list.replicate_zero List.replicate_zero
attribute [simp] replicate_succ
#align list.replicate_succ List.replicate_succ
lemma replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = [a] := rfl
#align list.replicate_one List.replicate_one
#align list.length_replicate List.length_replicate
#align list.mem_replicate List.mem_replicate
#align list.eq_of_mem_replicate List.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length]
#align list.eq_replicate_length List.eq_replicate_length
#align list.eq_replicate_of_mem List.eq_replicate_of_mem
#align list.eq_replicate List.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
induction m <;> simp [*, succ_add, replicate]
#align list.replicate_add List.replicate_add
theorem replicate_succ' (n) (a : α) : replicate (n + 1) a = replicate n a ++ [a] :=
replicate_add n 1 a
#align list.replicate_succ' List.replicate_succ'
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
#align list.replicate_subset_singleton List.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
#align list.subset_singleton_iff List.subset_singleton_iff
@[simp] theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (n) (a : α) :
map f (replicate n a) = replicate n (f a) := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, map]]
#align list.map_replicate List.map_replicate
@[simp] theorem tail_replicate (a : α) (n) :
tail (replicate n a) = replicate (n - 1) a := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.tail_replicate List.tail_replicate
@[simp] theorem join_replicate_nil (n : ℕ) : join (replicate n []) = @nil α := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, join, append_nil]]
#align list.join_replicate_nil List.join_replicate_nil
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align list.replicate_right_injective List.replicate_right_injective
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_right_inj List.replicate_right_inj
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
#align list.replicate_right_inj' List.replicate_right_inj'
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate · a)
#align list.replicate_left_injective List.replicate_left_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_left_inj List.replicate_left_inj
@[simp] theorem head_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) (h) : head (replicate n a) h = a := by
cases n <;> simp at h ⊢
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
#align list.mem_pure List.mem_pure
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.bind f :=
rfl
#align list.bind_eq_bind List.bind_eq_bind
#align list.bind_append List.append_bind
/-! ### concat -/
#align list.concat_nil List.concat_nil
#align list.concat_cons List.concat_cons
#align list.concat_eq_append List.concat_eq_append
#align list.init_eq_of_concat_eq List.init_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.last_eq_of_concat_eq List.last_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.concat_ne_nil List.concat_ne_nil
#align list.concat_append List.concat_append
#align list.length_concat List.length_concat
#align list.append_concat List.append_concat
/-! ### reverse -/
#align list.reverse_nil List.reverse_nil
#align list.reverse_core List.reverseAux
-- Porting note: Do we need this?
attribute [local simp] reverseAux
#align list.reverse_cons List.reverse_cons
#align list.reverse_core_eq List.reverseAux_eq
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
#align list.reverse_cons' List.reverse_cons'
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
#align list.reverse_singleton List.reverse_singleton
#align list.reverse_append List.reverse_append
#align list.reverse_concat List.reverse_concat
#align list.reverse_reverse List.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
#align list.reverse_involutive List.reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
#align list.reverse_injective List.reverse_injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
#align list.reverse_surjective List.reverse_surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
#align list.reverse_bijective List.reverse_bijective
@[simp]
theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : List α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_inj List.reverse_inj
theorem reverse_eq_iff {l l' : List α} : l.reverse = l' ↔ l = l'.reverse :=
reverse_involutive.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_iff List.reverse_eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_nil List.reverse_eq_nil_iff
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
#align list.concat_eq_reverse_cons List.concat_eq_reverse_cons
#align list.length_reverse List.length_reverse
-- Porting note: This one was @[simp] in mathlib 3,
-- but Lean contains a competing simp lemma reverse_map.
-- For now we remove @[simp] to avoid simplification loops.
-- TODO: Change Lean lemma to match mathlib 3?
theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
(reverse_map f l).symm
#align list.map_reverse List.map_reverse
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
#align list.map_reverse_core List.map_reverseAux
#align list.mem_reverse List.mem_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_replicate (n) (a : α) : reverse (replicate n a) = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate.2
⟨by rw [length_reverse, length_replicate],
fun b h => eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
#align list.reverse_replicate List.reverse_replicate
/-! ### empty -/
-- Porting note: this does not work as desired
-- attribute [simp] List.isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_iff_eq_nil {l : List α} : l.isEmpty ↔ l = [] := by cases l <;> simp [isEmpty]
#align list.empty_iff_eq_nil List.isEmpty_iff_eq_nil
/-! ### dropLast -/
#align list.length_init List.length_dropLast
/-! ### getLast -/
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons {a : α} {l : List α} :
∀ h : l ≠ nil, getLast (a :: l) (cons_ne_nil a l) = getLast l h := by
induction l <;> intros
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.last_cons List.getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l _ (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp only [getLast_append]
#align list.last_append_singleton List.getLast_append_singleton
-- Porting note: name should be fixed upstream
theorem getLast_append' (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l₁ l₂ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction' l₁ with _ _ ih
· simp
· simp only [cons_append]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
exact ih
#align list.last_append List.getLast_append'
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (concat_ne_nil a l) = a :=
getLast_concat ..
#align list.last_concat List.getLast_concat'
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
#align list.last_singleton List.getLast_singleton'
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
#align list.last_cons_cons List.getLast_cons_cons
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [a], h => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
#align list.init_append_last List.dropLast_append_getLast
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
#align list.last_congr List.getLast_congr
#align list.last_mem List.getLast_mem
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ (length_replicate _ _)) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
#align list.last_replicate_succ List.getLast_replicate_succ
/-! ### getLast? -/
-- Porting note: Moved earlier in file, for use in subsequent lemmas.
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_cons_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) :
getLast? (a :: b :: l) = getLast? (b :: l) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isNone : ∀ {l : List α}, (getLast? l).isNone ↔ l = []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isNone (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_none List.getLast?_isNone
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isSome : ∀ {l : List α}, l.getLast?.isSome ↔ l ≠ []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isSome (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_some List.getLast?_isSome
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
#align list.mem_last'_eq_last List.mem_getLast?_eq_getLast
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
#align list.last'_eq_last_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
#align list.mem_last'_cons List.mem_getLast?_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_getLast? {l : List α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.getLast?) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := mem_getLast?_eq_getLast ha
h₂.symm ▸ getLast_mem _
#align list.mem_of_mem_last' List.mem_of_mem_getLast?
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
#align list.init_append_last' List.dropLast_append_getLast?
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [a] => rfl
| [a, b] => rfl
| [a, b, c] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
#align list.ilast_eq_last' List.getLastI_eq_getLast?
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], a, l₂ => rfl
| [b], a, l₂ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
#align list.last'_append_cons List.getLast?_append_cons
#align list.last'_cons_cons List.getLast?_cons_cons
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
#align list.last'_append_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem getLast?_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
#align list.last'_append List.getLast?_append
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head_eq_head' List.head!_eq_head?
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_head List.surjective_head!
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
#align list.surjective_head' List.surjective_head?
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_tail List.surjective_tail
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
#align list.eq_cons_of_mem_head' List.eq_cons_of_mem_head?
theorem mem_of_mem_head? {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l.head?) : x ∈ l :=
(eq_cons_of_mem_head? h).symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
#align list.mem_of_mem_head' List.mem_of_mem_head?
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
#align list.head_cons List.head!_cons
#align list.tail_nil List.tail_nil
#align list.tail_cons List.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.head_append List.head!_append
theorem head?_append {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) : x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
#align list.head'_append List.head?_append
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
#align list.head'_append_of_ne_nil List.head?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
#align list.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
#align list.cons_head'_tail List.cons_head?_tail
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| a :: l, _ => rfl
#align list.head_mem_head' List.head!_mem_head?
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
#align list.cons_head_tail List.cons_head!_tail
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' := mem_cons_self l.head! l.tail
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
#align list.head_mem_self List.head!_mem_self
theorem head_mem {l : List α} : ∀ (h : l ≠ nil), l.head h ∈ l := by
cases l <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head?_map (f : α → β) (l) : head? (map f l) = (head? l).map f := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head'_map List.head?_map
theorem tail_append_of_ne_nil (l l' : List α) (h : l ≠ []) : (l ++ l').tail = l.tail ++ l' := by
cases l
· contradiction
· simp
#align list.tail_append_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_of_ne_nil
#align list.nth_le_eq_iff List.get_eq_iff
theorem get_eq_get? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = (l.get? i).get (by simp [get?_eq_get]) := by
simp [get_eq_iff]
#align list.some_nth_le_eq List.get?_eq_get
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false -- TODO(Mario): make replacements for theorems in this section
/-- nth element of a list `l` given `n < l.length`. -/
@[deprecated get (since := "2023-01-05")]
def nthLe (l : List α) (n) (h : n < l.length) : α := get l ⟨n, h⟩
#align list.nth_le List.nthLe
@[simp] theorem nthLe_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.nthLe i h = l.nthLe (i + 1) h' := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
#align list.nth_le_tail List.nthLe_tail
theorem nthLe_cons_aux {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : n < (a :: l).length) :
n - 1 < l.length := by
contrapose! h
rw [length_cons]
omega
#align list.nth_le_cons_aux List.nthLe_cons_aux
theorem nthLe_cons {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hl) :
(a :: l).nthLe n hl = if hn : n = 0 then a else l.nthLe (n - 1) (nthLe_cons_aux hn hl) := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [nthLe, h]
cases l
· rw [length_singleton, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hl
omega
cases n
· contradiction
rfl
#align list.nth_le_cons List.nthLe_cons
end deprecated
-- Porting note: List.modifyHead has @[simp], and Lean 4 treats this as
-- an invitation to unfold modifyHead in any context,
-- not just use the equational lemmas.
-- @[simp]
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem modifyHead_modifyHead (l : List α) (f g : α → α) :
(l.modifyHead f).modifyHead g = l.modifyHead (g ∘ f) := by cases l <;> simp
#align list.modify_head_modify_head List.modifyHead_modifyHead
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def reverseRecOn {motive : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) : motive l :=
match h : reverse l with
| [] => cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
nil
| head :: tail =>
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
append_singleton _ head <| reverseRecOn (reverse tail) nil append_singleton
termination_by l.length
decreasing_by
simp_wf
rw [← length_reverse l, h, length_cons]
simp [Nat.lt_succ]
#align list.reverse_rec_on List.reverseRecOn
@[simp]
theorem reverseRecOn_nil {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn [] nil append_singleton = nil := reverseRecOn.eq_1 ..
-- `unusedHavesSuffices` is getting confused by the unfolding of `reverseRecOn`
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem reverseRecOn_concat {motive : List α → Sort*} (x : α) (xs : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
append_singleton _ _ (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) xs nil append_singleton) := by
suffices ∀ ys (h : reverse (reverse xs) = ys),
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
cast (by simp [(reverse_reverse _).symm.trans h])
(append_singleton _ x (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) ys nil append_singleton)) by
exact this _ (reverse_reverse xs)
intros ys hy
conv_lhs => unfold reverseRecOn
split
next h => simp at h
next heq =>
revert heq
simp only [reverse_append, reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, singleton_append, cons.injEq]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
subst ys
rfl
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def bidirectionalRec {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
∀ l, motive l
| [] => nil
| [a] => singleton a
| a :: b :: l =>
let l' := dropLast (b :: l)
let b' := getLast (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
cast (by rw [← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)]) <|
cons_append a l' b' (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l')
termination_by l => l.length
#align list.bidirectional_rec List.bidirectionalRecₓ -- universe order
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_nil {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [] = nil := bidirectionalRec.eq_1 ..
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_singleton {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) (a : α):
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [a] = singleton a := by
simp [bidirectionalRec]
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_cons_append {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b])))
(a : α) (l : List α) (b : α) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append (a :: (l ++ [b])) =
cons_append a l b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bidirectionalRec
cases l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs =>
simp only [List.cons_append]
dsimp only [← List.cons_append]
suffices ∀ (ys init : List α) (hinit : init = ys) (last : α) (hlast : last = b),
(cons_append a init last
(bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append init)) =
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simp [hinit, hlast])
(cons_append a ys b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append ys)) by
rw [this (x :: xs) _ (by rw [dropLast_append_cons, dropLast_single, append_nil]) _ (by simp)]
simp
rintro ys init rfl last rfl
rfl
/-- Like `bidirectionalRec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
abbrev bidirectionalRecOn {C : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ a : α, C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectionalRec H0 H1 Hn l
#align list.bidirectional_rec_on List.bidirectionalRecOn
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
#align list.nil_sublist List.nil_sublist
#align list.sublist.refl List.Sublist.refl
#align list.sublist.trans List.Sublist.trans
#align list.sublist_cons List.sublist_cons
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist List.sublist_of_cons_sublist
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
#align list.sublist.cons_cons List.Sublist.cons_cons
#align list.sublist_append_left List.sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist_append_right List.sublist_append_right
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
#align list.sublist_cons_of_sublist List.sublist_cons_of_sublist
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_left List.sublist_append_of_sublist_left
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_right List.sublist_append_of_sublist_right
theorem tail_sublist : ∀ l : List α, tail l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a::l => sublist_cons a l
#align list.tail_sublist List.tail_sublist
@[gcongr] protected theorem Sublist.tail : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → tail l₁ <+ tail l₂
| _, _, slnil => .slnil
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ h => (tail_sublist _).trans h
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ _ h => h
theorem Sublist.of_cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} {a b : α} (h : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.tail
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons List.Sublist.of_cons_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")]
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {a} (h : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ := h.of_cons_cons
attribute [simp] cons_sublist_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")] alias cons_sublist_cons_iff := cons_sublist_cons
#align list.cons_sublist_cons_iff List.cons_sublist_cons_iff
#align list.append_sublist_append_left List.append_sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist.append_right List.Sublist.append_right
#align list.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist List.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist
#align list.sublist.reverse List.Sublist.reverse
#align list.reverse_sublist_iff List.reverse_sublist
#align list.append_sublist_append_right List.append_sublist_append_right
#align list.sublist.append List.Sublist.append
#align list.sublist.subset List.Sublist.subset
#align list.singleton_sublist List.singleton_sublist
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : List α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil <| s.subset
#align list.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil List.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil
-- Porting note: this lemma seems to have been renamed on the occasion of its move to Batteries
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
#align list.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil List.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
#align list.replicate_sublist_replicate List.replicate_sublist_replicate
theorem sublist_replicate_iff {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ} :
l <+ replicate n a ↔ ∃ k ≤ n, l = replicate k a :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨l.length, h.length_le.trans_eq (length_replicate _ _),
eq_replicate_length.mpr fun b hb => eq_of_mem_replicate (h.subset hb)⟩,
by rintro ⟨k, h, rfl⟩; exact (replicate_sublist_replicate _).mpr h⟩
#align list.sublist_replicate_iff List.sublist_replicate_iff
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length List.Sublist.eq_of_length
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length_le List.Sublist.eq_of_length_le
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
#align list.sublist.antisymm List.Sublist.antisymm
instance decidableSublist [DecidableEq α] : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [], _ => isTrue <| nil_sublist _
| _ :: _, [] => isFalse fun h => List.noConfusion <| eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ =>
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist l₁ l₂) <| h ▸ cons_sublist_cons.symm
else
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist (a :: l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, fun s =>
match a, l₁, s, h with
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ s', h => s'
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ t _, h => absurd rfl h⟩
#align list.decidable_sublist List.decidableSublist
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
#align list.index_of_nil List.indexOf_nil
/-
Porting note: The following proofs were simpler prior to the port. These proofs use the low-level
`findIdx.go`.
* `indexOf_cons_self`
* `indexOf_cons_eq`
* `indexOf_cons_ne`
* `indexOf_cons`
The ported versions of the earlier proofs are given in comments.
-/
-- indexOf_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_self (a : α) (l : List α) : indexOf a (a :: l) = 0 := by
rw [indexOf, findIdx_cons, beq_self_eq_true, cond]
#align list.index_of_cons_self List.indexOf_cons_self
-- fun e => if_pos e
theorem indexOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → indexOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact indexOf_cons_self b l
#align list.index_of_cons_eq List.indexOf_cons_eq
-- fun n => if_neg n
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → indexOf a (b :: l) = succ (indexOf a l)
| h => by simp only [indexOf, findIdx_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, h, ite_false]
#align list.index_of_cons_ne List.indexOf_cons_ne
#align list.index_of_cons List.indexOf_cons
theorem indexOf_eq_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction' l with b l ih
· exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _)
simp only [length, mem_cons, indexOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or_iff]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj'
#align list.index_of_eq_length List.indexOf_eq_length
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → indexOf a l = length l :=
indexOf_eq_length.2
#align list.index_of_of_not_mem List.indexOf_of_not_mem
theorem indexOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction' l with b l ih; · rfl
simp only [length, indexOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
#align list.index_of_le_length List.indexOf_le_length
theorem indexOf_lt_length {a} {l : List α} : indexOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.by_contradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| indexOf_eq_length.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne indexOf_le_length) fun h => indexOf_eq_length.1 h al⟩
#align list.index_of_lt_length List.indexOf_lt_length
theorem indexOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = indexOf a l₁ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· exfalso
exact not_mem_nil a h
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [indexOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
#align list.index_of_append_of_mem List.indexOf_append_of_mem
theorem indexOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + indexOf a l₂ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
rw [List.cons_append, indexOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
#align list.index_of_append_of_not_mem List.indexOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated get_of_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := get_of_mem h; ⟨i.1, i.2, h⟩
#align list.nth_le_of_mem List.nthLe_of_mem
@[deprecated get?_eq_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_get? {l : List α} {n} (h) : get? l n = some (nthLe l n h) := get?_eq_get _
#align list.nth_le_nth List.nthLe_get?
#align list.nth_len_le List.get?_len_le
@[simp]
theorem get?_length (l : List α) : l.get? l.length = none := get?_len_le le_rfl
#align list.nth_length List.get?_length
#align list.nth_eq_some List.get?_eq_some
#align list.nth_eq_none_iff List.get?_eq_none
#align list.nth_of_mem List.get?_of_mem
@[deprecated get_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_mem (l : List α) (n h) : nthLe l n h ∈ l := get_mem ..
#align list.nth_le_mem List.nthLe_mem
#align list.nth_mem List.get?_mem
@[deprecated mem_iff_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem mem_iff_nthLe {a} {l : List α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
mem_iff_get.trans ⟨fun ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩ => ⟨n, h, e⟩, fun ⟨n, h, e⟩ => ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩⟩
#align list.mem_iff_nth_le List.mem_iff_nthLe
#align list.mem_iff_nth List.mem_iff_get?
#align list.nth_zero List.get?_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-03")] alias get?_injective := get?_inj
#align list.nth_injective List.get?_inj
#align list.nth_map List.get?_map
@[deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nthLe (map f l) n H1 = f (nthLe l n H2) := get_map ..
#align list.nth_le_map List.nthLe_map
/-- A version of `get_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem get_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} :
f (get l n) = get (map f l) ⟨n.1, (l.length_map f).symm ▸ n.2⟩ := Eq.symm (get_map _)
/-- A version of `nthLe_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
@[deprecated get_map_rev (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nthLe l n H) = nthLe (map f l) n ((l.length_map f).symm ▸ H) :=
(nthLe_map f _ _).symm
#align list.nth_le_map_rev List.nthLe_map_rev
@[simp, deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nthLe (map f l) n H = f (nthLe l n (l.length_map f ▸ H)) := nthLe_map f _ _
#align list.nth_le_map' List.nthLe_map'
#align list.nth_le_of_eq List.get_of_eq
@[simp, deprecated get_singleton (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) : nthLe [a] n hn = a := get_singleton ..
#align list.nth_le_singleton List.get_singleton
#align list.nth_le_zero List.get_mk_zero
#align list.nth_le_append List.get_append
@[deprecated get_append_right' (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_append_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nthLe n h₂ = l₂.nthLe (n - l₁.length) (get_append_right_aux h₁ h₂) :=
get_append_right' h₁ h₂
#align list.nth_le_append_right_aux List.get_append_right_aux
#align list.nth_le_append_right List.nthLe_append_right
#align list.nth_le_replicate List.get_replicate
#align list.nth_append List.get?_append
#align list.nth_append_right List.get?_append_right
#align list.last_eq_nth_le List.getLast_eq_get
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_get l _).symm
#align list.nth_le_length_sub_one List.get_length_sub_one
#align list.nth_concat_length List.get?_concat_length
@[deprecated get_cons_length (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_cons_length : ∀ (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : ℕ) (h : n = xs.length),
(x :: xs).nthLe n (by simp [h]) = (x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs) := get_cons_length
#align list.nth_le_cons_length List.nthLe_cons_length
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_get_cons h, take, take]
#align list.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length List.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length
#align list.ext List.ext
-- TODO one may rename ext in the standard library, and it is also not clear
-- which of ext_get?, ext_get?', ext_get should be @[ext], if any
alias ext_get? := ext
theorem ext_get?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, get?_eq_none.mpr]
theorem ext_get?_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔ ∀ n, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _; rfl, ext_get?⟩
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_get?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_get?'⟩
@[deprecated ext_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem ext_nthLe {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀ n h₁ h₂, nthLe l₁ n h₁ = nthLe l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_get hl h
#align list.ext_le List.ext_nthLe
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h), get l ⟨indexOf a l, h⟩ = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, indexOf_cons, get, @indexOf_get _ _ l, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
#align list.index_of_nth_le List.indexOf_get
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get? [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
get? l (indexOf a l) = some a := by rw [get?_eq_get, indexOf_get (indexOf_lt_length.2 h)]
#align list.index_of_nth List.indexOf_get?
@[deprecated (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem get_reverse_aux₁ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i h1 h2), get (reverseAux l r) ⟨i + length l, h1⟩ = get r ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i => fun h1 _ => rfl
| a :: l, r, i => by
rw [show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l from Nat.add_right_comm i (length l) 1]
exact fun h1 h2 => get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) (i + 1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux1 List.get_reverse_aux₁
theorem indexOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
indexOf x l = indexOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨indexOf x l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨indexOf y l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [indexOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
#align list.index_of_inj List.indexOf_inj
theorem get_reverse_aux₂ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i : Nat) (h1) (h2),
get (reverseAux l r) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i, h1, h2 => absurd h2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| a :: l, r, 0, h1, _ => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) 0
rw [Nat.zero_add] at aux
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
| a :: l, r, i + 1, h1, h2 => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₂ l (a :: r) i
have heq : length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1) = length l - 1 - i := by rw [length]; omega
rw [← heq] at aux
apply aux
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux2 List.get_reverse_aux₂
@[simp] theorem get_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
get (reverse l) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩ :=
get_reverse_aux₂ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp, deprecated get_reverse (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
nthLe (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nthLe l i h2 :=
get_reverse ..
#align list.nth_le_reverse List.nthLe_reverse
theorem nthLe_reverse' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.reverse.length) (hn') :
l.reverse.nthLe n hn = l.nthLe (l.length - 1 - n) hn' := by
rw [eq_comm]
convert nthLe_reverse l.reverse n (by simpa) hn using 1
simp
#align list.nth_le_reverse' List.nthLe_reverse'
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := nthLe_reverse' ..
-- FIXME: prove it the other way around
attribute [deprecated get_reverse' (since := "2023-01-05")] nthLe_reverse'
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nthLe 0 (by omega)] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp only [get_singleton]
congr
omega
#align list.eq_cons_of_length_one List.eq_cons_of_length_one
end deprecated
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail {f g : List α → List α} (m : ℕ) :
∀ (n) (l : List α),
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g (m + n) =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g m) n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, a :: l => congr_arg (List.cons a) (modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail m n l)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le {f g : List α → List α} (m n : ℕ) (l : List α)
(h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g m =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g (m - n)) n := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.add_comm, modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same {f g : List α → List α} (n : ℕ) (l : List α) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g n = l.modifyNthTail (g ∘ f) n := by
rw [modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le n n l (le_refl n), Nat.sub_self]; rfl
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same
#align list.modify_nth_tail_id List.modifyNthTail_id
#align list.remove_nth_eq_nth_tail List.eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
#align list.update_nth_eq_modify_nth List.set_eq_modifyNth
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias removeNth_eq_nthTail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNth_eq_set (f : α → α) :
∀ (n) (l : List α), modifyNth f n l = ((fun a => set l n (f a)) <$> get? l n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, b :: l =>
(congr_arg (cons b) (modifyNth_eq_set f n l)).trans <| by cases h : get? l n <;> simp [h]
#align list.modify_nth_eq_update_nth List.modifyNth_eq_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth List.get?_modifyNth
theorem length_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _ => @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (· + 1) (length_modifyNthTail _ H _ _)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_length List.length_modifyNthTail
-- Porting note: Duplicate of `modify_get?_length`
-- (but with a substantially better name?)
-- @[simp]
theorem length_modifyNth (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modify_get?_length f
#align list.modify_nth_length List.length_modifyNth
#align list.update_nth_length List.length_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth_eq List.get?_modifyNth_eq
#align list.nth_modify_nth_ne List.get?_modifyNth_ne
#align list.nth_update_nth_eq List.get?_set_eq
#align list.nth_update_nth_of_lt List.get?_set_eq_of_lt
#align list.nth_update_nth_ne List.get?_set_ne
#align list.update_nth_nil List.set_nil
#align list.update_nth_succ List.set_succ
#align list.update_nth_comm List.set_comm
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_eq List.get_set_eq
@[simp]
theorem get_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a).get ⟨j, hj⟩ = l.get ⟨j, by simpa using hj⟩ := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.get?_eq_get, List.get?_set_ne _ _ h, List.get?_eq_get]
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_of_ne List.get_set_of_ne
#align list.mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth List.mem_or_eq_of_mem_set
/-! ### map -/
#align list.map_nil List.map_nil
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = foldr (fun a bs => f a :: bs) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.map_eq_foldr List.map_eq_foldr
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : List α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: l, h => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h
rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
#align list.map_congr List.map_congr
theorem map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : List α} : map f l = map g l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x := by
refine ⟨?_, map_congr⟩; intro h x hx
rw [mem_iff_get] at hx; rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
rw [get_map_rev f, get_map_rev g]
congr!
#align list.map_eq_map_iff List.map_eq_map_iff
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_concat List.map_concat
#align list.map_id'' List.map_id'
theorem map_id'' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : List α) : map f l = l := by
simp [show f = id from funext h]
#align list.map_id' List.map_id''
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : List α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero <| by rw [← length_map l f, h]; rfl
#align list.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil List.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : List (List α)) : map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) := by
induction L <;> [rfl; simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_join List.map_join
theorem bind_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_bind ..
#align list.bind_ret_eq_map List.bind_pure_eq_map
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated bind_pure_eq_map (since := "2024-03-24")]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (List.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
bind_pure_eq_map f l
theorem bind_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
List.bind l f = List.bind l g :=
(congr_arg List.join <| map_congr h : _)
#align list.bind_congr List.bind_congr
theorem infix_bind_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.bind f :=
List.infix_of_mem_join (List.mem_map_of_mem f h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
#align list.map_eq_map List.map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.map_tail List.map_tail
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
(map_map _ _ _).symm
#align list.comp_map List.comp_map
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
#align list.map_comp_map List.map_comp_map
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
#align list.map_injective_iff List.map_injective_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (fun a bs => bif p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as := by
induction' as with head tail
· rfl
· simp only [foldr]
cases hp : p head <;> simp [filter, *]
#align list.map_filter_eq_foldr List.map_filter_eq_foldr
theorem getLast_map (f : α → β) {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).getLast (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.getLast hl) := by
induction' l with l_hd l_tl l_ih
· apply (hl rfl).elim
· cases l_tl
· simp
· simpa using l_ih _
#align list.last_map List.getLast_map
theorem map_eq_replicate_iff {l : List α} {f : α → β} {b : β} :
l.map f = replicate l.length b ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = b := by
simp [eq_replicate]
#align list.map_eq_replicate_iff List.map_eq_replicate_iff
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : List α) (b : β) : map (const α b) l = replicate l.length b :=
map_eq_replicate_iff.mpr fun _ _ => rfl
#align list.map_const List.map_const
@[simp] theorem map_const' (l : List α) (b : β) : map (fun _ => b) l = replicate l.length b :=
map_const l b
#align list.map_const' List.map_const'
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
#align list.eq_of_mem_map_const List.eq_of_mem_map_const
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem nil_zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (l : List β) : zipWith f [] l = [] := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.nil_map₂ List.nil_zipWith
theorem zipWith_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : List α) : zipWith f l [] = [] := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.map₂_nil List.zipWith_nil
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_flip (f : α → β → γ) : ∀ as bs, zipWith (flip f) bs as = zipWith f as bs
| [], [] => rfl
| [], b :: bs => rfl
| a :: as, [] => rfl
| a :: as, b :: bs => by
simp! [zipWith_flip]
rfl
#align list.map₂_flip List.zipWith_flip
/-! ### take, drop -/
#align list.take_zero List.take_zero
#align list.take_nil List.take_nil
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : List α) : take (succ n) (a :: l) = a :: take n l :=
rfl
#align list.take_cons List.take_cons
#align list.take_length List.take_length
#align list.take_all_of_le List.take_all_of_le
#align list.take_left List.take_left
#align list.take_left' List.take_left'
#align list.take_take List.take_take
#align list.take_replicate List.take_replicate
#align list.map_take List.map_take
#align list.take_append_eq_append_take List.take_append_eq_append_take
#align list.take_append_of_le_length List.take_append_of_le_length
#align list.take_append List.take_append
#align list.nth_le_take List.get_take
#align list.nth_le_take' List.get_take'
#align list.nth_take List.get?_take
#align list.nth_take_of_succ List.nth_take_of_succ
#align list.take_succ List.take_succ
#align list.take_eq_nil_iff List.take_eq_nil_iff
#align list.take_eq_take List.take_eq_take
#align list.take_add List.take_add
#align list.init_eq_take List.dropLast_eq_take
#align list.init_take List.dropLast_take
#align list.init_cons_of_ne_nil List.dropLast_cons_of_ne_nil
#align list.init_append_of_ne_nil List.dropLast_append_of_ne_nil
#align list.drop_eq_nil_of_le List.drop_eq_nil_of_le
#align list.drop_eq_nil_iff_le List.drop_eq_nil_iff_le
#align list.tail_drop List.tail_drop
@[simp]
theorem drop_tail (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.tail.drop n = l.drop (n + 1) := by
rw [drop_add, drop_one]
theorem cons_get_drop_succ {l : List α} {n} :
l.get n :: l.drop (n.1 + 1) = l.drop n.1 :=
(drop_eq_get_cons n.2).symm
#align list.cons_nth_le_drop_succ List.cons_get_drop_succ
#align list.drop_nil List.drop_nil
#align list.drop_one List.drop_one
#align list.drop_add List.drop_add
#align list.drop_left List.drop_left
#align list.drop_left' List.drop_left'
#align list.drop_eq_nth_le_cons List.drop_eq_get_consₓ -- nth_le vs get
#align list.drop_length List.drop_length
#align list.drop_length_cons List.drop_length_cons
#align list.drop_append_eq_append_drop List.drop_append_eq_append_drop
#align list.drop_append_of_le_length List.drop_append_of_le_length
#align list.drop_append List.drop_append
#align list.drop_sizeof_le List.drop_sizeOf_le
#align list.nth_le_drop List.get_drop
#align list.nth_le_drop' List.get_drop'
#align list.nth_drop List.get?_drop
#align list.drop_drop List.drop_drop
#align list.drop_take List.drop_take
#align list.map_drop List.map_drop
#align list.modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop List.modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop
#align list.modify_nth_eq_take_drop List.modifyNth_eq_take_drop
#align list.modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop List.modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop
#align list.update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop List.set_eq_take_cons_drop
#align list.reverse_take List.reverse_take
#align list.update_nth_eq_nil List.set_eq_nil
section TakeI
variable [Inhabited α]
@[simp]
theorem takeI_length : ∀ n l, length (@takeI α _ n l) = n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ => congr_arg succ (takeI_length _ _)
#align list.take'_length List.takeI_length
@[simp]
theorem takeI_nil : ∀ n, takeI n (@nil α) = replicate n default
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => congr_arg (cons _) (takeI_nil _)
#align list.take'_nil List.takeI_nil
theorem takeI_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : List α}, n ≤ length l → takeI n l = take n l
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _, h => congr_arg (cons _) <| takeI_eq_take <| le_of_succ_le_succ h
#align list.take'_eq_take List.takeI_eq_take
@[simp]
theorem takeI_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : takeI (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(takeI_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, Nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
#align list.take'_left List.takeI_left
theorem takeI_left' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) : takeI n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ := by
rw [← h]; apply takeI_left
#align list.take'_left' List.takeI_left'
end TakeI
/- Porting note: in mathlib3 we just had `take` and `take'`. Now we have `take`, `takeI`, and
`takeD`. The following section replicates the theorems above but for `takeD`. -/
section TakeD
@[simp]
theorem takeD_length : ∀ n l a, length (@takeD α n l a) = n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _, _ => congr_arg succ (takeD_length _ _ _)
-- Porting note: `takeD_nil` is already in std
theorem takeD_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : List α} a, n ≤ length l → takeD n l a = take n l
| 0, _, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _, a, h => congr_arg (cons _) <| takeD_eq_take a <| le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp]
theorem takeD_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : takeD (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) a = l₁ :=
(takeD_eq_take a (by simp only [length_append, Nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem takeD_left' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n} {a} (h : length l₁ = n) : takeD n (l₁ ++ l₂) a = l₁ := by
rw [← h]; apply takeD_left
end TakeD
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
#align list.foldl_ext List.foldl_ext
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction' l with hd tl ih; · rfl
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
#align list.foldr_ext List.foldr_ext
#align list.foldl_nil List.foldl_nil
#align list.foldl_cons List.foldl_cons
#align list.foldr_nil List.foldr_nil
#align list.foldr_cons List.foldr_cons
#align list.foldl_append List.foldl_append
#align list.foldr_append List.foldr_append
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
#align list.foldl_fixed' List.foldl_fixed'
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
#align list.foldr_fixed' List.foldr_fixed'
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
#align list.foldl_fixed List.foldl_fixed
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
#align list.foldr_fixed List.foldr_fixed
@[simp]
theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : List (List β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a, [] => rfl
| a, l :: L => by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join f (foldl f a l) L]
#align list.foldl_join List.foldl_join
@[simp]
theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : List (List α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (fun l b => foldr f b l) b L
| a, [] => rfl
| a, l :: L => by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join f a L, foldr_cons]
#align list.foldr_join List.foldr_join
#align list.foldl_reverse List.foldl_reverse
#align list.foldr_reverse List.foldr_reverse
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem foldr_eta : ∀ l : List α, foldr cons [] l = l := by
simp only [foldr_self_append, append_nil, forall_const]
#align list.foldr_eta List.foldr_eta
@[simp]
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
rw [← foldr_reverse]; simp only [foldr_self_append, append_nil, reverse_reverse]
#align list.reverse_foldl List.reverse_foldl
#align list.foldl_map List.foldl_map
#align list.foldr_map List.foldr_map
theorem foldl_map' {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β) (a : α) (l : List α)
(h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
List.foldl f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (List.foldl f a l) := by
induction l generalizing a
· simp
· simp [*, h]
#align list.foldl_map' List.foldl_map'
theorem foldr_map' {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β) (a : α) (l : List α)
(h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
List.foldr f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (List.foldr f a l) := by
induction l generalizing a
· simp
· simp [*, h]
#align list.foldr_map' List.foldr_map'
#align list.foldl_hom List.foldl_hom
#align list.foldr_hom List.foldr_hom
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
#align list.foldl_hom₂ List.foldl_hom₂
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
#align list.foldr_hom₂ List.foldr_hom₂
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction' l with lh lt l_ih generalizing f
· exact hf
· apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
#align list.injective_foldl_comp List.injective_foldl_comp
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldr`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : α → β → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldrRecOn {C : β → Sort*} (l : List α) (op : α → β → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ l, C (op a b)) : C (foldr op b l) := by
induction l with
| nil => exact hb
| cons hd tl IH =>
refine hl _ ?_ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)
refine IH ?_
intro y hy x hx
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx)
#align list.foldr_rec_on List.foldrRecOn
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldl`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : β → α → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldlRecOn {C : β → Sort*} (l : List α) (op : β → α → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ l, C (op b a)) : C (foldl op b l) := by
induction l generalizing b with
| nil => exact hb
| cons hd tl IH =>
refine IH _ ?_ ?_
· exact hl b hb hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)
· intro y hy x hx
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx)
#align list.foldl_rec_on List.foldlRecOn
@[simp]
theorem foldrRecOn_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldrRecOn [] op b hb hl = hb :=
rfl
#align list.foldr_rec_on_nil List.foldrRecOn_nil
@[simp]
theorem foldrRecOn_cons {C : β → Sort*} (x : α) (l : List α) (op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ x :: l, C (op a b)) :
foldrRecOn (x :: l) op b hb hl =
hl _ (foldrRecOn l op b hb fun b hb a ha => hl b hb a (mem_cons_of_mem _ ha)) x
(mem_cons_self _ _) :=
rfl
#align list.foldr_rec_on_cons List.foldrRecOn_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldlRecOn_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : β → α → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldlRecOn [] op b hb hl = hb :=
rfl
#align list.foldl_rec_on_nil List.foldlRecOn_nil
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section Scanl
variable {f : β → α → β} {b : β} {a : α} {l : List α}
theorem length_scanl : ∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a, [] => rfl
| a, x :: l => by
rw [scanl, length_cons, length_cons, ← succ_eq_add_one, congr_arg succ]
exact length_scanl _ _
#align list.length_scanl List.length_scanl
@[simp]
theorem scanl_nil (b : β) : scanl f b nil = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.scanl_nil List.scanl_nil
@[simp]
theorem scanl_cons : scanl f b (a :: l) = [b] ++ scanl f (f b a) l := by
simp only [scanl, eq_self_iff_true, singleton_append, and_self_iff]
#align list.scanl_cons List.scanl_cons
@[simp]
theorem get?_zero_scanl : (scanl f b l).get? 0 = some b := by
cases l
· simp only [get?, scanl_nil]
· simp only [get?, scanl_cons, singleton_append]
#align list.nth_zero_scanl List.get?_zero_scanl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} : (scanl f b l).get ⟨0, h⟩ = b := by
cases l
· simp only [get, scanl_nil]
· simp only [get, scanl_cons, singleton_append]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp, deprecated get_zero_scanl (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} : (scanl f b l).nthLe 0 h = b :=
get_zero_scanl
#align list.nth_le_zero_scanl List.nthLe_zero_scanl
theorem get?_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} : (scanl f b l).get? (i + 1) =
((scanl f b l).get? i).bind fun x => (l.get? i).map fun y => f x y := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing b i
· symm
simp only [Option.bind_eq_none', get?, forall₂_true_iff, not_false_iff, Option.map_none',
scanl_nil, Option.not_mem_none, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [scanl_cons, singleton_append]
cases i
· simp only [Option.map_some', get?_zero_scanl, get?, Option.some_bind']
· simp only [hl, get?]
#align list.nth_succ_scanl List.get?_succ_scanl
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem nthLe_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nthLe (i + 1) h =
f ((scanl f b l).nthLe i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt h))
(l.nthLe i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l))))) := by
induction i generalizing b l with
| zero =>
cases l
· simp only [length, zero_eq, lt_self_iff_false] at h
· simp [scanl_cons, singleton_append, nthLe_zero_scanl, nthLe_cons]
| succ i hi =>
cases l
· simp only [length] at h
exact absurd h (by omega)
· simp_rw [scanl_cons]
rw [nthLe_append_right]
· simp only [length, Nat.zero_add 1, succ_add_sub_one, hi]; rfl
· simp only [length_singleton]; omega
#align list.nth_le_succ_scanl List.nthLe_succ_scanl
theorem get_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).get ⟨i + 1, h⟩ =
f ((scanl f b l).get ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt h⟩)
(l.get ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l)))⟩) :=
nthLe_succ_scanl
-- FIXME: we should do the proof the other way around
attribute [deprecated get_succ_scanl (since := "2023-01-05")] nthLe_succ_scanl
end Scanl
-- scanr
@[simp]
theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.scanr_nil List.scanr_nil
#noalign list.scanr_aux_cons
@[simp]
theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
scanr f b (a :: l) = foldr f b (a :: l) :: scanr f b l := by
simp only [scanr, foldr, cons.injEq, and_true]
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih => simp only [foldr, ih]
#align list.scanr_cons List.scanr_cons
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : Commutative f) (hassoc : Associative f)
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| a, b, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw [hassoc]
#align list.foldl1_eq_foldr1 List.foldl1_eq_foldr1
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; rfl
#align list.foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc List.foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
#align list.foldl_eq_foldr List.foldl_eq_foldr
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a, b, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
#align list.foldl_eq_of_comm' List.foldl_eq_of_comm'
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
#align list.foldl_eq_foldr' List.foldl_eq_foldr'
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c))
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a, b, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' ..]; rfl
#align list.foldr_eq_of_comm' List.foldr_eq_of_comm'
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op] [hc : Std.Commutative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂
| [], a₁, a₂ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ =>
calc
((a :: l) <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂) = l <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂ ⋆ a := by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
_ = a₁ ⋆ (a :: l) <*> a₂ := by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
#align list.foldl_assoc List.foldl_assoc
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], a₁, a₂ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
#align list.foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc List.foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
#align list.foldl_assoc_comm_cons List.foldl_assoc_comm_cons
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
#align list.mfoldl_nil List.foldlM_nil
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldr_nil List.foldrM_nil
#align list.mfoldl_cons List.foldlM_cons
/- Porting note: now in std; now assumes an instance of `LawfulMonad m`, so we make everything
`foldrM_eq_foldr` depend on one as well. (An instance of `LawfulMonad m` was already present for
everything following; this just moves it a few lines up.) -/
#align list.mfoldr_cons List.foldrM_cons
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.mfoldr_eq_foldr List.foldrM_eq_foldr
attribute [simp] mapM mapM'
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
#align list.mfoldl_eq_foldl List.foldlM_eq_foldl
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldl_append List.foldlM_append
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldr_append List.foldrM_append
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
#align list.intersperse_nil List.intersperse_nil
@[simp]
theorem intersperse_singleton (a b : α) : intersperse a [b] = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.intersperse_singleton List.intersperse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem intersperse_cons_cons (a b c : α) (tl : List α) :
intersperse a (b :: c :: tl) = b :: a :: intersperse a (c :: tl) :=
rfl
#align list.intersperse_cons_cons List.intersperse_cons_cons
/-! ### splitAt and splitOn -/
section SplitAtOn
/- Porting note: the new version of `splitOnP` uses a `Bool`-valued predicate instead of a
`Prop`-valued one. All downstream definitions have been updated to match. -/
variable (p : α → Bool) (xs ys : List α) (ls : List (List α)) (f : List α → List α)
/- Porting note: this had to be rewritten because of the new implementation of `splitAt`. It's
long in large part because `splitAt.go` (`splitAt`'s auxiliary function) works differently
in the case where n ≥ length l, requiring two separate cases (and two separate inductions). Still,
this can hopefully be golfed. -/
@[simp]
theorem splitAt_eq_take_drop (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : splitAt n l = (take n l, drop n l) := by
by_cases h : n < l.length <;> rw [splitAt, go_eq_take_drop]
· rw [if_pos h]; rfl
· rw [if_neg h, take_all_of_le <| le_of_not_lt h, drop_eq_nil_of_le <| le_of_not_lt h]
where
go_eq_take_drop (n : ℕ) (l xs : List α) (acc : Array α) : splitAt.go l xs n acc =
if n < xs.length then (acc.toList ++ take n xs, drop n xs) else (l, []) := by
split_ifs with h
· induction n generalizing xs acc with
| zero =>
rw [splitAt.go, take, drop, append_nil]
· intros h₁; rw [h₁] at h; contradiction
· intros; contradiction
| succ _ ih =>
cases xs with
| nil => contradiction
| cons hd tl =>
rw [length] at h
rw [splitAt.go, take, drop, append_cons, Array.toList_eq, ← Array.push_data,
← Array.toList_eq]
exact ih _ _ <| (by omega)
· induction n generalizing xs acc with
| zero =>
replace h : xs.length = 0 := by omega
rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h, splitAt.go]
| succ _ ih =>
cases xs with
| nil => rw [splitAt.go]
| cons hd tl =>
rw [length] at h
rw [splitAt.go]
exact ih _ _ <| not_imp_not.mpr (Nat.add_lt_add_right · 1) h
#align list.split_at_eq_take_drop List.splitAt_eq_take_drop
@[simp]
theorem splitOn_nil [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : [].splitOn a = [[]] :=
rfl
#align list.split_on_nil List.splitOn_nil
@[simp]
theorem splitOnP_nil : [].splitOnP p = [[]] :=
rfl
#align list.split_on_p_nil List.splitOnP_nilₓ
/- Porting note: `split_on_p_aux` and `split_on_p_aux'` were used to prove facts about
`split_on_p`. `splitOnP` has a different structure, and we need different facts about
`splitOnP.go`. Theorems involving `split_on_p_aux` have been omitted where possible. -/
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_ne_nil
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_spec
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux'
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_eq
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_nil
theorem splitOnP.go_ne_nil (xs acc : List α) : splitOnP.go p xs acc ≠ [] := by
induction xs generalizing acc <;> simp [go]; split <;> simp [*]
theorem splitOnP.go_acc (xs acc : List α) :
splitOnP.go p xs acc = modifyHead (acc.reverse ++ ·) (splitOnP p xs) := by
induction xs generalizing acc with
| nil => simp only [go, modifyHead, splitOnP_nil, append_nil]
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [splitOnP, go]; split
· simp only [modifyHead, reverse_nil, append_nil]
· rw [ih [hd], modifyHead_modifyHead, ih]
congr; funext x; simp only [reverse_cons, append_assoc]; rfl
theorem splitOnP_ne_nil (xs : List α) : xs.splitOnP p ≠ [] := splitOnP.go_ne_nil _ _ _
#align list.split_on_p_ne_nil List.splitOnP_ne_nilₓ
@[simp]
theorem splitOnP_cons (x : α) (xs : List α) :
(x :: xs).splitOnP p =
if p x then [] :: xs.splitOnP p else (xs.splitOnP p).modifyHead (cons x) := by
rw [splitOnP, splitOnP.go]; split <;> [rfl; simp [splitOnP.go_acc]]
#align list.split_on_p_cons List.splitOnP_consₓ
/-- The original list `L` can be recovered by joining the lists produced by `splitOnP p L`,
interspersed with the elements `L.filter p`. -/
theorem splitOnP_spec (as : List α) :
join (zipWith (· ++ ·) (splitOnP p as) (((as.filter p).map fun x => [x]) ++ [[]])) = as := by
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as' ih =>
rw [splitOnP_cons, filter]
by_cases h : p a
· rw [if_pos h, h, map, cons_append, zipWith, nil_append, join, cons_append, cons_inj]
exact ih
· rw [if_neg h, eq_false_of_ne_true h, join_zipWith (splitOnP_ne_nil _ _)
(append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ [[]] (cons_ne_nil [] [])), cons_inj]
exact ih
where
join_zipWith {xs ys : List (List α)} {a : α} (hxs : xs ≠ []) (hys : ys ≠ []) :
join (zipWith (fun x x_1 ↦ x ++ x_1) (modifyHead (cons a) xs) ys) =
a :: join (zipWith (fun x x_1 ↦ x ++ x_1) xs ys) := by
cases xs with | nil => contradiction | cons =>
cases ys with | nil => contradiction | cons => rfl
#align list.split_on_p_spec List.splitOnP_specₓ
/-- If no element satisfies `p` in the list `xs`, then `xs.splitOnP p = [xs]` -/
theorem splitOnP_eq_single (h : ∀ x ∈ xs, ¬p x) : xs.splitOnP p = [xs] := by
induction xs with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [splitOnP_cons, h hd (mem_cons_self hd tl), if_neg]
rw [ih <| forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h]
rfl
#align list.split_on_p_eq_single List.splitOnP_eq_singleₓ
/-- When a list of the form `[...xs, sep, ...as]` is split on `p`, the first element is `xs`,
assuming no element in `xs` satisfies `p` but `sep` does satisfy `p` -/
theorem splitOnP_first (h : ∀ x ∈ xs, ¬p x) (sep : α) (hsep : p sep) (as : List α) :
(xs ++ sep :: as).splitOnP p = xs :: as.splitOnP p := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp [hsep]
| cons hd tl ih => simp [h hd _, ih <| forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h]
#align list.split_on_p_first List.splitOnP_firstₓ
/-- `intercalate [x]` is the left inverse of `splitOn x` -/
theorem intercalate_splitOn (x : α) [DecidableEq α] : [x].intercalate (xs.splitOn x) = xs := by
simp only [intercalate, splitOn]
induction' xs with hd tl ih; · simp [join]
cases' h' : splitOnP (· == x) tl with hd' tl'; · exact (splitOnP_ne_nil _ tl h').elim
rw [h'] at ih
rw [splitOnP_cons]
split_ifs with h
· rw [beq_iff_eq] at h
subst h
simp [ih, join, h']
cases tl' <;> simpa [join, h'] using ih
#align list.intercalate_split_on List.intercalate_splitOn
/-- `splitOn x` is the left inverse of `intercalate [x]`, on the domain
consisting of each nonempty list of lists `ls` whose elements do not contain `x` -/
theorem splitOn_intercalate [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (hx : ∀ l ∈ ls, x ∉ l) (hls : ls ≠ []) :
([x].intercalate ls).splitOn x = ls := by
simp only [intercalate]
induction' ls with hd tl ih; · contradiction
cases tl
· suffices hd.splitOn x = [hd] by simpa [join]
refine splitOnP_eq_single _ _ ?_
intro y hy H
rw [eq_of_beq H] at hy
refine hx hd ?_ hy
simp
· simp only [intersperse_cons_cons, singleton_append, join]
specialize ih _ _
· intro l hl
apply hx l
simp only [mem_cons] at hl ⊢
exact Or.inr hl
· exact List.noConfusion
have := splitOnP_first (· == x) hd ?h x (beq_self_eq_true _)
case h =>
intro y hy H
rw [eq_of_beq H] at hy
exact hx hd (.head _) hy
simp only [splitOn] at ih ⊢
rw [this, ih]
#align list.split_on_intercalate List.splitOn_intercalate
end SplitAtOn
/- Porting note: new; here tentatively -/
/-! ### modifyLast -/
section ModifyLast
theorem modifyLast.go_append_one (f : α → α) (a : α) (tl : List α) (r : Array α) :
modifyLast.go f (tl ++ [a]) r = (r.toListAppend <| modifyLast.go f (tl ++ [a]) #[]) := by
cases tl with
| nil =>
simp only [nil_append, modifyLast.go]; rfl
| cons hd tl =>
simp only [cons_append]
rw [modifyLast.go, modifyLast.go]
case x_3 | x_3 => exact append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right tl [a] (cons_ne_nil a [])
rw [modifyLast.go_append_one _ _ tl _, modifyLast.go_append_one _ _ tl (Array.push #[] hd)]
simp only [Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.push_data, Array.data_toArray, nil_append, append_assoc]
theorem modifyLast_append_one (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
modifyLast f (l ++ [a]) = l ++ [f a] := by
cases l with
| nil =>
simp only [nil_append, modifyLast, modifyLast.go, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.data_toArray]
| cons _ tl =>
simp only [cons_append, modifyLast]
rw [modifyLast.go]
case x_3 => exact append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right tl [a] (cons_ne_nil a [])
rw [modifyLast.go_append_one, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.push_data, Array.data_toArray,
nil_append, cons_append, nil_append, cons_inj]
exact modifyLast_append_one _ _ tl
theorem modifyLast_append (f : α → α) (l₁ l₂ : List α) (_ : l₂ ≠ []) :
modifyLast f (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyLast f l₂ := by
cases l₂ with
| nil => contradiction
| cons hd tl =>
cases tl with
| nil => exact modifyLast_append_one _ hd _
| cons hd' tl' =>
rw [append_cons, ← nil_append (hd :: hd' :: tl'), append_cons [], nil_append,
modifyLast_append _ (l₁ ++ [hd]) (hd' :: tl') _, modifyLast_append _ [hd] (hd' :: tl') _,
append_assoc]
all_goals { exact cons_ne_nil _ _ }
end ModifyLast
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
#align list.pmap List.pmap
#align list.attach List.attach
@[simp] lemma attach_nil : ([] : List α).attach = [] := rfl
#align list.attach_nil List.attach_nil
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 2,504 | 2,509 | theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by |
induction' l with h t ih <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
#align_import probability.martingale.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ba074af83b6cf54c3104e59402b39410ddbd6dca"
/-!
# Martingales
A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if every
`f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. On the other hand, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a supermartingale
with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with resepct to `ℱ`
and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. Finally, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a
submartingale with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with
resepct to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i]`.
The definitions of filtration and adapted can be found in `Probability.Process.Stopping`.
### Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Martingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a martingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Supermartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a supermartingale with respect to
filtration `ℱ` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a submartingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
### Results
* `MeasureTheory.martingale_condexp f ℱ μ`: the sequence `fun i => μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i])` is a
martingale with respect to `ℱ` and `μ`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f g : ι → Ω → E} {ℱ : Filtration ι m0}
/-- A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if `f`
is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Martingale (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
#align measure_theory.martingale MeasureTheory.Martingale
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a supermartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Supermartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
#align measure_theory.supermartingale MeasureTheory.Supermartingale
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a submartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`. -/
def Submartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i]) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
#align measure_theory.submartingale MeasureTheory.Submartingale
theorem martingale_const (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (x : E) :
Martingale (fun _ _ => x) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_const ℱ _, fun i j _ => by rw [condexp_const (ℱ.le _)]⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_const MeasureTheory.martingale_const
theorem martingale_const_fun [OrderBot ι] (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : Ω → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[ℱ ⊥] f) (hfint : Integrable f μ) :
Martingale (fun _ => f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le, fun i j _ => ?_⟩
rw [condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le) hfint]
#align measure_theory.martingale_const_fun MeasureTheory.martingale_const_fun
variable (E)
theorem martingale_zero (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Martingale (0 : ι → Ω → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, fun i j _ => by rw [Pi.zero_apply, condexp_zero]; simp⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_zero MeasureTheory.martingale_zero
variable {E}
namespace Martingale
protected theorem adapted (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.martingale.adapted MeasureTheory.Martingale.adapted
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
#align measure_theory.martingale.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Martingale.stronglyMeasurable
theorem condexp_ae_eq (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) : μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2 i j hij
#align measure_theory.martingale.condexp_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Martingale.condexp_ae_eq
protected theorem integrable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
integrable_condexp.congr (hf.condexp_ae_eq (le_refl i))
#align measure_theory.martingale.integrable MeasureTheory.Martingale.integrable
theorem setIntegral_eq [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j)
{s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) : ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← @setIntegral_condexp _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ i) m0 _ _ _ (ℱ.le i) _ (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (ℱ.le i s hs) ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2 i j hij] with _ heq _ using heq.symm
#align measure_theory.martingale.set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.Martingale.setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq := setIntegral_eq
theorem add (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.add hg.adapted, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exact (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).add (hg.2 i j hij))
#align measure_theory.martingale.add MeasureTheory.Martingale.add
theorem neg (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.adapted.neg, fun i j hij => (condexp_neg (f j)).trans (hf.2 i j hij).neg⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale.neg MeasureTheory.Martingale.neg
theorem sub (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
#align measure_theory.martingale.sub MeasureTheory.Martingale.sub
theorem smul (c : ℝ) (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
refine (condexp_smul c (f j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).mono fun x hx => ?_)
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
#align measure_theory.martingale.smul MeasureTheory.Martingale.smul
theorem supermartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Supermartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale.supermartingale MeasureTheory.Martingale.supermartingale
theorem submartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).symm.le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale.submartingale MeasureTheory.Martingale.submartingale
end Martingale
theorem martingale_iff [PartialOrder E] :
Martingale f ℱ μ ↔ Supermartingale f ℱ μ ∧ Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.supermartingale, hf.submartingale⟩, fun ⟨hf₁, hf₂⟩ =>
⟨hf₁.1, fun i j hij => (hf₁.2.1 i j hij).antisymm (hf₂.2.1 i j hij)⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_iff MeasureTheory.martingale_iff
theorem martingale_condexp (f : Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω)
[SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] : Martingale (fun i => μ[f|ℱ i]) ℱ μ :=
⟨fun _ => stronglyMeasurable_condexp, fun _ j hij => condexp_condexp_of_le (ℱ.mono hij) (ℱ.le j)⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_condexp MeasureTheory.martingale_condexp
namespace Supermartingale
protected theorem adapted [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.adapted MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.adapted
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.stronglyMeasurable
protected theorem integrable [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
hf.2.2 i
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.integrable MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.integrable
theorem condexp_ae_le [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.condexp_ae_le MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.condexp_ae_le
theorem setIntegral_le [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) :
∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_condexp (ℱ.le i) (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_mono_ae integrable_condexp.integrableOn (hf.integrable i).integrableOn ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ heq using heq
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.set_integral_le MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.setIntegral_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_le := setIntegral_le
theorem add [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Supermartingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).add (hg.2.2 i)⟩
refine (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).le.trans ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij, hg.2.1 i j hij]
intros
refine add_le_add ?_ ?_ <;> assumption
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.add MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.add
theorem add_martingale [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
hf.add hg.supermartingale
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.add_martingale MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.add_martingale
theorem neg [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (-f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.neg, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).neg⟩
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condexp_neg (f j)).symm.le
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ _
simpa
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.neg MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.neg
end Supermartingale
namespace Submartingale
protected theorem adapted [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.submartingale.adapted MeasureTheory.Submartingale.adapted
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
#align measure_theory.submartingale.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Submartingale.stronglyMeasurable
protected theorem integrable [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
hf.2.2 i
#align measure_theory.submartingale.integrable MeasureTheory.Submartingale.integrable
theorem ae_le_condexp [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i] :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
#align measure_theory.submartingale.ae_le_condexp MeasureTheory.Submartingale.ae_le_condexp
theorem add [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).add (hg.2.2 i)⟩
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).symm.le
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij, hg.2.1 i j hij]
intros
refine add_le_add ?_ ?_ <;> assumption
#align measure_theory.submartingale.add MeasureTheory.Submartingale.add
theorem add_martingale [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
hf.add hg.submartingale
#align measure_theory.submartingale.add_martingale MeasureTheory.Submartingale.add_martingale
theorem neg [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (-f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.neg, fun i j hij => (condexp_neg (f j)).le.trans ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).neg⟩
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ _
simpa
#align measure_theory.submartingale.neg MeasureTheory.Submartingale.neg
/-- The converse of this lemma is `MeasureTheory.submartingale_of_setIntegral_le`. -/
theorem setIntegral_le [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) :
∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← integral_neg, ← integral_neg]
exact Supermartingale.setIntegral_le hf.neg hij hs
#align measure_theory.submartingale.set_integral_le MeasureTheory.Submartingale.setIntegral_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_le := setIntegral_le
theorem sub_supermartingale [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)]
(hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Supermartingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
#align measure_theory.submartingale.sub_supermartingale MeasureTheory.Submartingale.sub_supermartingale
theorem sub_martingale [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_supermartingale hg.supermartingale
#align measure_theory.submartingale.sub_martingale MeasureTheory.Submartingale.sub_martingale
protected theorem sup {f g : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (f ⊔ g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => @StronglyMeasurable.sup _ _ _ _ (ℱ i) _ _ _ (hf.adapted i) (hg.adapted i),
fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => Integrable.sup (hf.integrable _) (hg.integrable _)⟩
refine EventuallyLE.sup_le ?_ ?_
· exact EventuallyLE.trans (hf.2.1 i j hij)
(condexp_mono (hf.integrable _) (Integrable.sup (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j))
(eventually_of_forall fun x => le_max_left _ _))
· exact EventuallyLE.trans (hg.2.1 i j hij)
(condexp_mono (hg.integrable _) (Integrable.sup (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j))
(eventually_of_forall fun x => le_max_right _ _))
#align measure_theory.submartingale.sup MeasureTheory.Submartingale.sup
protected theorem pos {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f⁺) ℱ μ :=
hf.sup (martingale_zero _ _ _).submartingale
#align measure_theory.submartingale.pos MeasureTheory.Submartingale.pos
end Submartingale
section Submartingale
theorem submartingale_of_setIntegral_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted ℱ f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i j : ι,
i ≤ j → ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s → ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ) :
Submartingale f ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hadp, fun i j hij => ?_, hint⟩
suffices f i ≤ᵐ[μ.trim (ℱ.le i)] μ[f j|ℱ i] by exact ae_le_of_ae_le_trim this
suffices 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.trim (ℱ.le i)] μ[f j|ℱ i] - f i by
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
rwa [← sub_nonneg]
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
((integrable_condexp.sub (hint i)).trim _ (stronglyMeasurable_condexp.sub <| hadp i))
fun s hs _ => ?_
specialize hf i j hij s hs
rwa [← setIntegral_trim _ (stronglyMeasurable_condexp.sub <| hadp i) hs,
integral_sub' integrable_condexp.integrableOn (hint i).integrableOn, sub_nonneg,
setIntegral_condexp (ℱ.le i) (hint j) hs]
#align measure_theory.submartingale_of_set_integral_le MeasureTheory.submartingale_of_setIntegral_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias submartingale_of_set_integral_le := submartingale_of_setIntegral_le
theorem submartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted ℱ f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i]) :
Submartingale f ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hadp, fun i j hij => ?_, hint⟩
rw [← condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hadp _) (hint _), ← eventually_sub_nonneg]
exact EventuallyLE.trans (hf i j hij) (condexp_sub (hint _) (hint _)).le
#align measure_theory.submartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg MeasureTheory.submartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg
theorem Submartingale.condexp_sub_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι}
(hij : i ≤ j) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i] := by
by_cases h : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (ℱ.le i))
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite (ℱ.le i) h]
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condexp_sub (hf.integrable _) (hf.integrable _)).symm.le
rw [eventually_sub_nonneg,
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.adapted _) (hf.integrable _)]
exact hf.2.1 i j hij
#align measure_theory.submartingale.condexp_sub_nonneg MeasureTheory.Submartingale.condexp_sub_nonneg
theorem submartingale_iff_condexp_sub_nonneg [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} :
Submartingale f ℱ μ ↔
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i] :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.adapted, h.integrable, fun _ _ => h.condexp_sub_nonneg⟩, fun ⟨hadp, hint, h⟩ =>
submartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg hadp hint h⟩
#align measure_theory.submartingale_iff_condexp_sub_nonneg MeasureTheory.submartingale_iff_condexp_sub_nonneg
end Submartingale
namespace Supermartingale
theorem sub_submartingale [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.sub_submartingale MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.sub_submartingale
theorem sub_martingale [Preorder E] [CovariantClass E E (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_submartingale hg.submartingale
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.sub_martingale MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.sub_martingale
section
variable {F : Type*} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
[OrderedSMul ℝ F]
theorem smul_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).smul c⟩
refine (condexp_smul c (f j)).le.trans ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ hle
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply]
exact smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hle hc
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.smul_nonneg
theorem smul_nonpos {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≤ 0) (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(-c • f))]
exact (hf.smul_nonneg <| neg_nonneg.2 hc).neg
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.smul_nonpos MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.smul_nonpos
end
end Supermartingale
namespace Submartingale
section
variable {F : Type*} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
[OrderedSMul ℝ F]
theorem smul_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(c • -f))]
exact Supermartingale.neg (hf.neg.smul_nonneg hc)
#align measure_theory.submartingale.smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.Submartingale.smul_nonneg
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Basic.lean | 394 | 397 | theorem smul_nonpos {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≤ 0) (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by |
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(-c • f))]
exact (hf.smul_nonneg <| neg_nonneg.2 hc).neg
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
#align_import data.rat.cast from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"acebd8d49928f6ed8920e502a6c90674e75bd441"
/-!
# Some exiled lemmas about casting
These lemmas have been removed from `Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Defs`
to avoiding needing to import `Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic` there.
In fact, these lemmas don't appear to be used anywhere in Mathlib,
so perhaps this file can simply be deleted.
-/
namespace Rat
variable {α : Type*} [DivisionRing α]
-- Porting note: rewrote proof
@[simp]
theorem cast_inv_nat (n : ℕ) : ((n⁻¹ : ℚ) : α) = (n : α)⁻¹ := by
cases' n with n
· simp
rw [cast_def, inv_natCast_num, inv_natCast_den, if_neg n.succ_ne_zero,
Int.sign_eq_one_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr n.succ_pos), Int.cast_one, one_div]
#align rat.cast_inv_nat Rat.cast_inv_nat
-- Porting note: proof got a lot easier - is this still the intended statement?
@[simp]
theorem cast_inv_int (n : ℤ) : ((n⁻¹ : ℚ) : α) = (n : α)⁻¹ := by
cases' n with n n
· simp [ofInt_eq_cast, cast_inv_nat]
· simp only [ofInt_eq_cast, Int.cast_negSucc, ← Nat.cast_succ, cast_neg, inv_neg, cast_inv_nat]
#align rat.cast_inv_int Rat.cast_inv_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_nnratCast {K} [DivisionRing K] (q : ℚ≥0) :
((q : ℚ) : K) = (q : K) := by
rw [Rat.cast_def, NNRat.cast_def, NNRat.cast_def]
have hn := @num_div_eq_of_coprime q.num q.den ?hdp q.coprime_num_den
on_goal 1 => have hd := @den_div_eq_of_coprime q.num q.den ?hdp q.coprime_num_den
case hdp => simpa only [Nat.cast_pos] using q.den_pos
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_inj] at hn hd
rw [hn, hd, Int.cast_natCast]
/-- Casting a scientific literal via `ℚ` is the same as casting directly. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_ofScientific {K} [DivisionRing K] (m : ℕ) (s : Bool) (e : ℕ) :
(OfScientific.ofScientific m s e : ℚ) = (OfScientific.ofScientific m s e : K) := by
rw [← NNRat.cast_ofScientific (K := K), ← NNRat.cast_ofScientific, cast_nnratCast]
end Rat
namespace NNRat
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/Lemmas.lean | 64 | 67 | theorem cast_pow {K} [DivisionSemiring K] (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) :
NNRat.cast (q ^ n) = (NNRat.cast q : K) ^ n := by |
rw [cast_def, cast_def, den_pow, num_pow, Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, ← inv_pow,
← (Nat.cast_commute _ _).mul_pow, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
#align_import measure_theory.measure.measure_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace
open scoped Classical symmDiff
open Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_is_measurably_generated MeasureTheory.ae_isMeasurablyGenerated
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
#align measure_theory.ae_uIoc_iff MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union MeasureTheory.measure_union
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union' MeasureTheory.measure_union'
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_inter_add_diff
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_diff_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter' MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter'
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union] using measure_union disjoint_sdiff_sdiff (ht.diff hs)
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_add_measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_add_measure_compl
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion₀
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion₀
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset₀
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
#align measure_theory.tsum_meas_le_meas_Union_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_null' MeasureTheory.measure_diff_null'
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) : μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union' disjoint_sdiff_right hs, union_diff_self]
#align measure_theory.measure_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_add_diff
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : MeasurableSet t) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
Eq.symm <| ENNReal.sub_eq_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff' MeasureTheory.measure_diff'
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff MeasureTheory.measure_diff
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
#align measure_theory.le_measure_diff MeasureTheory.le_measure_diff
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := (WithTop.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩).symm
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} :
μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
#align measure_theory.measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_compl
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} {t : β → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ b, s b ⊆ t b) (h_le : ∀ b, μ (t b) ≤ μ (s b)) : μ (⋃ b, s b) = μ (⋃ b, t b) := by
rcases Classical.em (∃ b, μ (t b) = ∞) with (⟨b, hb⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ b, s b) = ∞ := top_unique (hb ▸ (h_le b).trans <| measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, t b) := Eq.symm <| top_unique <| hb ▸ measure_mono (subset_iUnion _ _)
push_neg at htop
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono (iUnion_mono hsub)) ?_
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
#align measure_theory.measure_union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_union_congr_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b, s b) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _b => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _b =>
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_toMeasurable
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_toMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_to_measurable_union MeasureTheory.measure_toMeasurable_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_union_toMeasurable
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i)) (H : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily
-measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable ι
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
generalize ht : Function.extend Encodable.encode s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion,
iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective, (· ∘ ·), Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty,
measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i => measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) :=
MeasurableSet.disjointed fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) ≤ μ (⋃ n, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun i => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} : μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
have hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) (Accumulate f) := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rli ↦ le_trans rli rik,
biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rlj ↦ le_trans rlj rjk⟩
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd.directed_val, ← iSup_subtype'']
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le _ k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (MeasurableSet.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => ?_)
· rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· rw [tsub_le_iff_right, ← measure_union, Set.union_comm]
· exact measure_mono (diff_subset_iff.1 Subset.rfl)
· apply disjoint_sdiff_left
· apply h i
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
#align measure_theory.measure_Inter_eq_infi MeasureTheory.measure_iInter_eq_iInf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
let s := fun i ↦ ⋂ j ≤ i, f j
have iInter_eq : ⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i, s i := by
ext x; simp [s]; constructor
· exact fun h _ j _ ↦ h j
· intro h i
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact h j i rij
have ms : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i) :=
fun i ↦ MeasurableSet.biInter (countable_univ.mono <| subset_univ _) fun i _ ↦ h i
have hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biInter_subset_biInter_left fun j rji ↦ le_trans rji rik,
biInter_subset_biInter_left fun i rij ↦ le_trans rij rjk⟩
have hfin' : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞ := by
rcases hfin with ⟨i, hi⟩
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact ⟨j, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hi <| measure_mono <| biInter_subset_of_mem rij⟩
exact iInter_eq ▸ measure_iInter_eq_iInf ms hd hfin'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Countable ι]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hm.directed_le]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Union MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup']
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n)) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf hs hm.directed_ge hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Inter MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iInter
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ∈ {j | j ≤ i}, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf' hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, MeasurableSet (s r)) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun l hl => ?_, fun L hL => ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin (s := Ioi a)] with r hr using hl.trans_le
(measure_mono (biInter_subset_of_mem hr))
obtain ⟨u, u_anti, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ι, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, a < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, ar, _⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto' ar with ⟨w, w_anti, w_mem, w_lim⟩
exact ⟨w, w_anti, fun n => (w_mem n).1, w_lim⟩
have A : Tendsto (μ ∘ s ∘ u) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s (u n)))) := by
refine tendsto_measure_iInter (fun n => hs _ (u_pos n)) ?_ ?_
· intro m n hmn
exact hm _ _ (u_pos n) (u_anti.antitone hmn)
· rcases hf with ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 r rpos).exists
refine ⟨n, ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hr.lt_top)⟩
exact measure_mono (hm _ _ (u_pos n) hn.le)
have B : ⋂ n, s (u n) = ⋂ r > a, s r := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro r rpos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ rpos).exists
exact Subset.trans (iInter_subset _ n) (hm (u n) r (u_pos n) hn.le)
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro n
apply biInter_subset_of_mem
exact u_pos n
rw [B] at A
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, μ (s (u n)) < L := ((tendsto_order.1 A).2 _ hL).exists
have : Ioc a (u n) ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, u_pos n⟩
filter_upwards [this] with r hr using lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (hm _ _ hr.1 hr.2)) hn
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_bInter_gt MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_biInter_gt
/-- One direction of the **Borel-Cantelli lemma** (sometimes called the "*first* Borel-Cantelli
lemma"): if (sᵢ) is a sequence of sets such that `∑ μ sᵢ` is finite, then the limit superior of the
`sᵢ` is a null set.
Note: for the *second* Borel-Cantelli lemma (applying to independent sets in a probability space),
see `ProbabilityTheory.measure_limsup_eq_one`. -/
theorem measure_limsup_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (hs : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (limsup s atTop) = 0 := by
-- First we replace the sequence `sₙ` with a sequence of measurable sets `tₙ ⊇ sₙ` of the same
-- measure.
set t : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (s n)
have ht : (∑' i, μ (t i)) ≠ ∞ := by simpa only [t, measure_toMeasurable] using hs
suffices μ (limsup t atTop) = 0 by
have A : s ≤ t := fun n => subset_toMeasurable μ (s n)
-- TODO default args fail
exact measure_mono_null (limsup_le_limsup (eventually_of_forall (Pi.le_def.mp A))) this
-- Next we unfold `limsup` for sets and replace equality with an inequality
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', Set.iInf_eq_iInter, Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, ←
nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
-- Finally, we estimate `μ (⋃ i, t (i + n))` by `∑ i', μ (t (i + n))`
refine
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto'
(tendsto_measure_iInter
(fun i => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun b => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) ?_
⟨0, ne_top_of_le_ne_top ht (measure_iUnion_le t)⟩)
(ENNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add (μ ∘ t) ht) fun n => measure_iUnion_le _
intro n m hnm x
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i + (m - n), by simpa only [add_assoc, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hnm] using hi⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_limsup_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_limsup_eq_zero
theorem measure_liminf_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (liminf s atTop) = 0 := by
rw [← le_zero_iff]
have : liminf s atTop ≤ limsup s atTop := liminf_le_limsup
exact (μ.mono this).trans (by simp [measure_limsup_eq_zero h])
#align measure_theory.measure_liminf_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_liminf_eq_zero
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : limsup (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.limsup_sdiff s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_limsup s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` above because of diamond; see #19041
theorem liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : liminf (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.liminf_sdiff s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_liminf s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align measure_theory.measure_if MeasureTheory.measure_if
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory MeasureTheory.le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.to_measure_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.toMeasure_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
#align measure_theory.le_to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.le_toMeasure_apply
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply₀ MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply₀
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
#align measure_theory.to_outer_measure_to_measure MeasureTheory.toOuterMeasure_toMeasure
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
#align measure_theory.bounded_by_measure MeasureTheory.boundedBy_measure
end OuterMeasure
section
/- Porting note: These variables are wrapped by an anonymous section because they interrupt
synthesizing instances in `MeasureSpace` section. -/
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_inter MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_inter
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero [MeasurableSpace α] : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.instZero
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_zero
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.subsingleton MeasureTheory.Measure.instSubsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
#align measure_theory.measure.eq_zero_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.eq_zero_of_isEmpty
instance instInhabited [MeasurableSpace α] : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.inhabited MeasureTheory.Measure.instInhabited
instance instAdd [MeasurableSpace α] : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_add MeasureTheory.Measure.instAdd
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.add_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_add
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.add_apply
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul [MeasurableSpace α] : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_apply
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_comm_class MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_scalar_tower MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsScalarTower
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_central_scalar MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsCentralScalar
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instMulAction
instance instAddCommMonoid [MeasurableSpace α] : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.add_comm_monoid MeasureTheory.Measure.instAddCommMonoid
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add_hom MeasureTheory.Measure.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_finset_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_finset_sum
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.finset_sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.finset_sum_apply
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.distrib_mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instDistribMulAction
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.module MeasureTheory.Measure.instModule
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, smul_apply, or_iff_right_iff_imp, mul_eq_zero]
simp only [IsEmpty.forall_iff, hc]
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_smul_measure_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_smul_measure_iff
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_add_inter_left MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_add_inter_right MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder [MeasurableSpace α] : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl m s := le_rfl
le_trans m₁ m₂ m₃ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
#align measure_theory.measure.partial_order MeasureTheory.Measure.instPartialOrder
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_le MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_le
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
#align measure_theory.measure.le_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.le_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.le_iff'
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
#align measure_theory.measure.lt_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.lt_iff
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
#align measure_theory.measure.lt_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.lt_iff'
instance covariantAddLE [MeasurableSpace α] :
CovariantClass (Measure α) (Measure α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.covariant_add_le MeasureTheory.Measure.covariantAddLE
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_add_left MeasureTheory.Measure.le_add_left
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_add_right MeasureTheory.Measure.le_add_right
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
#align measure_theory.measure.Inf_caratheodory MeasureTheory.Measure.sInf_caratheodory
instance [MeasurableSpace α] : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.Inf_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.sInf_apply
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun μ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf [MeasurableSpace α] : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
#align measure_theory.measure.complete_semilattice_Inf MeasureTheory.Measure.instCompleteSemilatticeInf
instance instCompleteLattice [MeasurableSpace α] : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun μ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
#align measure_theory.measure.complete_lattice MeasureTheory.Measure.instCompleteLattice
end sInf
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure_top MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top [MeasurableSpace α] :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_top MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_top
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.top_add MeasureTheory.Measure.top_add
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_top MeasureTheory.Measure.add_top
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_le MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_ne_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_pos
/-! ### Pushforward and pullback -/
/-- Lift a linear map between `OuterMeasure` spaces such that for each measure `μ` every measurable
set is caratheodory-measurable w.r.t. `f μ` to a linear map between `Measure` spaces. -/
def liftLinear {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β)
(hf : ∀ μ : Measure α, ‹_› ≤ (f μ.toOuterMeasure).caratheodory) :
Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure β where
toFun μ := (f μ.toOuterMeasure).toMeasure (hf μ)
map_add' μ₁ μ₂ := ext fun s hs => by
simp only [map_add, coe_add, Pi.add_apply, toMeasure_apply, add_toOuterMeasure,
OuterMeasure.coe_add, hs]
map_smul' c μ := ext fun s hs => by
simp only [LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply,
toMeasure_apply, smul_toOuterMeasure (R := ℝ≥0∞), OuterMeasure.coe_smul (R := ℝ≥0∞),
smul_apply, hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.lift_linear MeasureTheory.Measure.liftLinear
lemma liftLinear_apply₀ {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) {s : Set β}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (liftLinear f hf μ)) : liftLinear f hf μ s = f μ.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply₀ _ (hf μ) hs
@[simp]
theorem liftLinear_apply {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : liftLinear f hf μ s = f μ.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply _ (hf μ) hs
#align measure_theory.measure.lift_linear_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.liftLinear_apply
theorem le_liftLinear_apply {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) (s : Set β) :
f μ.toOuterMeasure s ≤ liftLinear f hf μ s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ (hf μ) s
#align measure_theory.measure.le_lift_linear_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_liftLinear_apply
/-- The pushforward of a measure as a linear map. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not
a measurable function. -/
def mapₗ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure β :=
if hf : Measurable f then
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.map f) fun μ _s hs t =>
le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory μ _ (hf hs) (f ⁻¹' t)
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ
theorem mapₗ_congr {f g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
mapₗ f μ = mapₗ g μ := by
ext1 s hs
simpa only [mapₗ, hf, hg, hs, dif_pos, liftLinear_apply, OuterMeasure.map_apply]
using measure_congr (h.preimage s)
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_congr
/-- The pushforward of a measure. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not an almost everywhere
measurable function. -/
irreducible_def map [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) : Measure β :=
if hf : AEMeasurable f μ then mapₗ (hf.mk f) μ else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.map MeasureTheory.Measure.map
theorem mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
mapₗ (hf.mk f) μ = map f μ := by simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_mk_apply_of_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable
theorem mapₗ_apply_of_measurable {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (μ : Measure α) :
mapₗ f μ = map f μ := by
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable]
exact mapₗ_congr hf hf.aemeasurable.measurable_mk hf.aemeasurable.ae_eq_mk
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_apply_of_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_apply_of_measurable
@[simp]
theorem map_add (μ ν : Measure α) {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ + ν).map f = μ.map f + ν.map f := by simp [← mapₗ_apply_of_measurable hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_add MeasureTheory.Measure.map_add
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : (0 : Measure α).map f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f (0 : Measure α) <;> simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_of_not_aemeasurable {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ¬AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.map f = 0 := by simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_of_not_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.map_of_not_aemeasurable
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Measure.map f μ = Measure.map g μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· have hg : AEMeasurable g μ := hf.congr h
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf, ← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hg]
exact
mapₗ_congr hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk (hf.ae_eq_mk.symm.trans (h.trans hg.ae_eq_mk))
· have hg : ¬AEMeasurable g μ := by simpa [← aemeasurable_congr h] using hf
simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable, hf, hg]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.map_congr
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β) :
(c • μ).map f = c • μ.map f := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc); · simp
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· have hfc : AEMeasurable f (c • μ) :=
⟨hf.mk f, hf.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).2 hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf, ← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hfc,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply]
congr 1
apply mapₗ_congr hfc.measurable_mk hf.measurable_mk
exact EventuallyEq.trans ((ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 hfc.ae_eq_mk.symm) hf.ae_eq_mk
· have hfc : ¬AEMeasurable f (c • μ) := by
intro hfc
exact hf ⟨hfc.mk f, hfc.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 hfc.ae_eq_mk⟩
simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable hf, map_of_not_aemeasurable hfc]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.map_smul
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul_nnreal (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β) :
(c • μ).map f = c • μ.map f :=
μ.map_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) f
#align measure_theory.measure.map_smul_nnreal MeasureTheory.Measure.map_smul_nnreal
variable {f : α → β}
lemma map_apply₀ {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (map f μ)) : μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map, dif_pos hf, mapₗ, dif_pos hf.measurable_mk] at hs ⊢
rw [liftLinear_apply₀ _ hs, measure_congr (hf.ae_eq_mk.preimage s)]
rfl
/-- We can evaluate the pushforward on measurable sets. For non-measurable sets, see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.le_map_apply` and `MeasurableEquiv.map_apply`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := map_apply₀ hf hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.map_apply_of_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable
@[simp]
theorem map_apply (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) :=
map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable hs
#align measure_theory.measure.map_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.map_apply
theorem map_toOuterMeasure (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(μ.map f).toOuterMeasure = (OuterMeasure.map f μ.toOuterMeasure).trim := by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_trim_iff]
intro s hs
simp [hf, hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.map_toOuterMeasure
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_iff (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.map f = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf .univ, preimage_univ]
@[simp] lemma mapₗ_eq_zero_iff (hf : Measurable f) : Measure.mapₗ f μ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [mapₗ_apply_of_measurable hf, map_eq_zero_iff hf.aemeasurable]
lemma map_ne_zero_iff (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.map f ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 := (map_eq_zero_iff hf).not
lemma mapₗ_ne_zero_iff (hf : Measurable f) : Measure.mapₗ f μ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
(mapₗ_eq_zero_iff hf).not
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map id μ = μ :=
ext fun _ => map_apply measurable_id
#align measure_theory.measure.map_id MeasureTheory.Measure.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : map (fun x => x) μ = μ :=
map_id
#align measure_theory.measure.map_id' MeasureTheory.Measure.map_id'
theorem map_map {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ.map f).map g = μ.map (g ∘ f) :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hf, hg, hs, hg hs, hg.comp hf, ← preimage_comp]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_map MeasureTheory.Measure.map_map
@[mono]
theorem map_mono {f : α → β} (h : μ ≤ ν) (hf : Measurable f) : μ.map f ≤ ν.map f :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simp [hf.aemeasurable, hs, h _]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.map_mono
/-- Even if `s` is not measurable, we can bound `map f μ s` from below.
See also `MeasurableEquiv.map_apply`. -/
theorem le_map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (s : Set β) : μ (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ μ.map f s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ μ (f ⁻¹' toMeasurable (μ.map f) s) := by gcongr; apply subset_toMeasurable
_ = μ.map f (toMeasurable (μ.map f) s) :=
(map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf <| measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).symm
_ = μ.map f s := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_map_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_map_apply
theorem le_map_apply_image {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (s : Set α) :
μ s ≤ μ.map f (f '' s) :=
(measure_mono (subset_preimage_image f s)).trans (le_map_apply hf _)
/-- Even if `s` is not measurable, `map f μ s = 0` implies that `μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0`. -/
theorem preimage_null_of_map_null {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : μ.map f s = 0) : μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.mp <| (le_map_apply hf s).trans_eq hs
#align measure_theory.measure.preimage_null_of_map_null MeasureTheory.Measure.preimage_null_of_map_null
theorem tendsto_ae_map {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : Tendsto f (ae μ) (ae (μ.map f)) :=
fun _ hs => preimage_null_of_map_null hf hs
#align measure_theory.measure.tendsto_ae_map MeasureTheory.Measure.tendsto_ae_map
/-- Pullback of a `Measure` as a linear map. If `f` sends each measurable set to a measurable
set, then for each measurable set `s` we have `comapₗ f μ s = μ (f '' s)`.
If the linearity is not needed, please use `comap` instead, which works for a larger class of
functions. -/
def comapₗ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Measure β →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
if hf : Injective f ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s) then
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.comap f) fun μ s hs t => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.comap_apply, image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1]
apply le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
exact hf.2 s hs
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ
theorem comapₗ_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comapₗ f μ s = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [comapₗ, dif_pos, liftLinear_apply _ hs, OuterMeasure.comap_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
exact ⟨hfi, hf⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ_apply
/-- Pullback of a `Measure`. If `f` sends each measurable set to a null-measurable set,
then for each measurable set `s` we have `comap f μ s = μ (f '' s)`. -/
def comap [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) : Measure α :=
if hf : Injective f ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ then
(OuterMeasure.comap f μ.toOuterMeasure).toMeasure fun s hs t => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.comap_apply, image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1]
exact (measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ (hf.2 s hs)).symm
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.comap MeasureTheory.Measure.comap
theorem comap_apply₀ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (comap f μ)) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [comap, dif_pos (And.intro hfi hf)] at hs ⊢
rw [toMeasure_apply₀ _ _ hs, OuterMeasure.comap_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_apply₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_apply₀
theorem le_comap_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ) (s : Set α) :
μ (f '' s) ≤ comap f μ s := by
rw [comap, dif_pos (And.intro hfi hf)]
exact le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_comap_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_comap_apply
theorem comap_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
comap_apply₀ f μ hfi (fun s hs => (hf s hs).nullMeasurableSet) hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_apply
theorem comapₗ_eq_comap {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comapₗ f μ s = comap f μ s :=
(comapₗ_apply f hfi hf μ hs).trans (comap_apply f hfi hf μ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ_eq_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ_eq_comap
theorem measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
(f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ) {s : Set α} (hs : comap f μ s = 0) :
μ (f '' s) = 0 :=
le_antisymm ((le_comap_apply f μ hfi hf s).trans hs.le) (zero_le _)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
{s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᵐ[comap f μ] t) : f '' s =ᵐ[μ] f '' t := by
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff] at hst ⊢
have h_eq_α : { a : α | ¬s a = t a } = s \ t ∪ t \ s := by
ext1 x
simp only [eq_iff_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_union, mem_diff]
tauto
have h_eq_β : { a : β | ¬(f '' s) a = (f '' t) a } = f '' s \ f '' t ∪ f '' t \ f '' s := by
ext1 x
simp only [eq_iff_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_union, mem_diff]
tauto
rw [← Set.image_diff hfi, ← Set.image_diff hfi, ← Set.image_union] at h_eq_β
rw [h_eq_β]
rw [h_eq_α] at hst
exact measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero f μ hfi hf hst
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap
theorem NullMeasurableSet.image {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.comap f)) : NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ := by
refine ⟨toMeasurable μ (f '' toMeasurable (μ.comap f) s), measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _, ?_⟩
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq ?_).symm
swap
· exact hf _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
have h : toMeasurable (comap f μ) s =ᵐ[comap f μ] s :=
NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq hs
exact ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap f μ hfi hf h.symm
#align measure_theory.measure.null_measurable_set.image MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurableSet.image
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,451 | 1,455 | theorem comap_preimage {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β)
{s : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (hf' : Measurable f)
(h : ∀ t, MeasurableSet t → NullMeasurableSet (f '' t) μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by |
rw [comap_apply₀ _ _ hf h (hf' hs).nullMeasurableSet, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
#align_import topology.continuous_on from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file defines relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
and proves their basic properties, including the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
#align nhds_bind_nhds_within nhds_bind_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
#align eventually_nhds_nhds_within eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align eventually_nhds_within_iff eventually_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
#align frequently_nhds_within_iff frequently_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
#align mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
#align eventually_nhds_within_nhds_within eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
#align nhds_within_eq nhdsWithin_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
#align nhds_within_univ nhdsWithin_univ
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set α} {a : α} (h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s)
(t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
#align nhds_within_has_basis nhdsWithin_hasBasis
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
#align nhds_within_basis_open nhdsWithin_basis_open
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_compl diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_diff diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
#align nhds_of_nhds_within_of_nhds nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually_eq mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
#align nhds_within_eq_iff_eventually_eq nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
#align nhds_within_le_iff nhdsWithin_le_iff
-- Porting note: golfed, dropped an unneeded assumption
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced' preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced'ₓ
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
#align mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
#align self_mem_nhds_within self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
#align eventually_mem_nhds_within eventually_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
#align inter_mem_nhds_within inter_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_mono (a : α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝[t] a :=
inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr h)
#align nhds_within_mono nhdsWithin_mono
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
#align pure_le_nhds_within pure_le_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
#align mem_of_mem_nhds_within mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
#align filter.eventually.self_of_nhds_within Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
#align tendsto_const_nhds_within tendsto_const_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
#align nhds_within_restrict'' nhdsWithin_restrict''
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
#align nhds_within_restrict' nhdsWithin_restrict'
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
#align nhds_within_restrict nhdsWithin_restrict
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
#align nhds_within_le_of_mem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
#align nhds_within_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within' nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin'
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds nhdsWithin_eq_nhds
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
#align is_open.nhds_within_eq IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced preimage_nhds_within_coinduced
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
#align nhds_within_empty nhdsWithin_empty
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
#align nhds_within_union nhdsWithin_union
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a :=
Set.Finite.induction_on hI (by simp) fun _ _ hT ↦ by
simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
#align nhds_within_bUnion nhdsWithin_biUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
#align nhds_within_sUnion nhdsWithin_sUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
#align nhds_within_Union nhdsWithin_iUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
#align nhds_within_inter nhdsWithin_inter
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
#align nhds_within_inter' nhdsWithin_inter'
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem' nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem'
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
#align nhds_within_singleton nhdsWithin_singleton
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
#align nhds_within_insert nhdsWithin_insert
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
#align mem_nhds_within_insert mem_nhdsWithin_insert
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
#align insert_mem_nhds_within_insert insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
#align insert_mem_nhds_iff insert_mem_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align nhds_within_compl_singleton_sup_pure nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure
theorem nhdsWithin_prod {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
#align nhds_within_prod nhdsWithin_prod
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
(hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq' nhdsWithin_pi_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
(hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq nhdsWithin_pi_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)]
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
#align nhds_within_pi_univ_eq nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : 𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq_bot nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : (𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
#align nhds_within_pi_ne_bot nhdsWithin_pi_neBot
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
#align filter.tendsto.piecewise_nhds_within Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
#align filter.tendsto.if_nhds_within Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
#align map_nhds_within map_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
#align tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
#align tendsto_nhds_within_mono_right tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
#align tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
#align eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhds_within eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhds_within tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
#align nhds_within_ne_bot_of_mem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
#align is_closed.mem_of_nhds_within_ne_bot IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
#align dense_range.nhds_within_ne_bot DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
#align mem_closure_pi mem_closure_pi
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
#align closure_pi_set closure_pi_set
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
#align dense_pi dense_pi
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align eventually_eq_nhds_within_iff eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
#align eventually_eq_nhds_within_of_eq_on eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
#align set.eq_on.eventually_eq_nhds_within Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
#align tendsto_nhds_within_congr tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
#align eventually_nhds_within_of_forall eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_iff tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_range tendsto_nhdsWithin_range
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
#align filter.eventually_eq.eq_of_nhds_within Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
#align eventually_nhds_within_of_eventually_nhds eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
#align mem_nhds_within_subtype mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
#align nhds_within_subtype nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
#align nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_coe nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
#align mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhds_within mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
#align tendsto_nhds_within_iff_subtype tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
#align continuous_on.continuous_within_at ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align continuous_within_at_univ continuousWithinAt_univ
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
#align continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
#align continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α} {y : β}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at *
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, Prod.map, nhds_prod_eq]
exact hf.prod_map hg
#align continuous_within_at.prod_map ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α]
{f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ⟨x.1, ·⟩) {b | (x.1, b) ∈ s} x.2 := by
rw [← x.eta]; simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, pure_prod,
← map_inf_principal_preimage]; rfl
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β]
{f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ⟨·, x.2⟩) {a | (a, x.2) ∈ s} x.1 := by
rw [← x.eta]; simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, prod_pure,
← map_inf_principal_preimage]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ⟨x.1, ·⟩) x.2 := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ]; exact continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left
theorem continuousAt_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ⟨·, x.2⟩) x.1 := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ]; exact continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right
theorem continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ a, ContinuousOn (f ⟨a, ·⟩) {b | (a, b) ∈ s} := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, Prod.forall, continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left]; rfl
theorem continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b, ContinuousOn (f ⟨·, b⟩) {a | (a, b) ∈ s} := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, Prod.forall, continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right]; apply forall_swap
/-- If a function `f a b` is such that `y ↦ f a b` is continuous for all `a`, and `a` lives in a
discrete space, then `f` is continuous, and vice versa. -/
theorem continuous_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ a, Continuous (f ⟨a, ·⟩) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_left
theorem continuous_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Continuous (f ⟨·, b⟩) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_right
theorem isOpenMap_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ a, IsOpenMap (f ⟨a, ·⟩) := by
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Prod.forall, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, pure_prod, map_map]
rfl
theorem isOpenMap_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ b, IsOpenMap (f ⟨·, b⟩) := by
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Prod.forall, forall_swap (α := α) (β := β), nhds_prod_eq,
nhds_discrete, prod_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem continuousWithinAt_pi {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} {x : α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (fun y => f y i) s x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
#align continuous_within_at_pi continuousWithinAt_pi
theorem continuousOn_pi {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} : ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (fun y => f y i) s :=
⟨fun h i x hx => tendsto_pi_nhds.1 (h x hx) i, fun h x hx => tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun i => h i x hx⟩
#align continuous_on_pi continuousOn_pi
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_pi' {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn (fun y => f y i) s) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
continuousOn_pi.2 hf
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] (i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : α → π i} {a : α} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) {g : α → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s a) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) s a :=
hf.tendsto.fin_insertNth i hg
#align continuous_within_at.fin_insert_nth ContinuousWithinAt.fin_insertNth
nonrec theorem ContinuousOn.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] (i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : α → π i} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {g : α → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
ContinuousOn (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) s := fun a ha =>
(hf a ha).fin_insertNth i (hg a ha)
#align continuous_on.fin_insert_nth ContinuousOn.fin_insertNth
theorem continuousOn_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
#align continuous_on_iff continuousOn_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 646 | 652 | theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by |
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Order.Bounded
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.PartENat
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.ordinal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7c2ce0c2da15516b4e65d0c9e254bb6dc93abd1f"
/-!
# Cardinals and ordinals
Relationships between cardinals and ordinals, properties of cardinals that are proved
using ordinals.
## Main definitions
* The function `Cardinal.aleph'` gives the cardinals listed by their ordinal
index, and is the inverse of `Cardinal.aleph/idx`.
`aleph' n = n`, `aleph' ω = ℵ₀`, `aleph' (ω + 1) = succ ℵ₀`, etc.
It is an order isomorphism between ordinals and cardinals.
* The function `Cardinal.aleph` gives the infinite cardinals listed by their
ordinal index. `aleph 0 = ℵ₀`, `aleph 1 = succ ℵ₀` is the first
uncountable cardinal, and so on. The notation `ω_` combines the latter with `Cardinal.ord`,
giving an enumeration of (infinite) initial ordinals.
Thus `ω_ 0 = ω` and `ω₁ = ω_ 1` is the first uncountable ordinal.
* The function `Cardinal.beth` enumerates the Beth cardinals. `beth 0 = ℵ₀`,
`beth (succ o) = 2 ^ beth o`, and for a limit ordinal `o`, `beth o` is the supremum of `beth a`
for `a < o`.
## Main Statements
* `Cardinal.mul_eq_max` and `Cardinal.add_eq_max` state that the product (resp. sum) of two infinite
cardinals is just their maximum. Several variations around this fact are also given.
* `Cardinal.mk_list_eq_mk` : when `α` is infinite, `α` and `List α` have the same cardinality.
* simp lemmas for inequalities between `bit0 a` and `bit1 b` are registered, making `simp`
able to prove inequalities about numeral cardinals.
## Tags
cardinal arithmetic (for infinite cardinals)
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Cardinal Equiv Order Ordinal
open scoped Classical
universe u v w
namespace Cardinal
section UsingOrdinals
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Ordinal.lean | 61 | 70 | theorem ord_isLimit {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by |
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact omega_isLimit
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Gabin Kolly
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Closure
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Semantics
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Encoding
#align_import model_theory.substructures from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0602c59878ff3d5f71dea69c2d32ccf2e93e5398"
/-!
# First-Order Substructures
This file defines substructures of first-order structures in a similar manner to the various
substructures appearing in the algebra library.
## Main Definitions
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Substructure` is defined so that `L.Substructure M` is the type of all
substructures of the `L`-structure `M`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure` is defined so that if `s : Set M`, `closure L s` is
the least substructure of `M` containing `s`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap` is defined so that `s.comap f` is the preimage of the
substructure `s` under the homomorphism `f`, as a substructure.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map` is defined so that `s.map f` is the image of the
substructure `s` under the homomorphism `f`, as a substructure.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Hom.range` is defined so that `f.range` is the range of the
homomorphism `f`, as a substructure.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Hom.domRestrict` and `FirstOrder.Language.Hom.codRestrict` restrict
the domain and codomain respectively of first-order homomorphisms to substructures.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.domRestrict` and `FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.codRestrict`
restrict the domain and codomain respectively of first-order embeddings to substructures.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.inclusion` is the inclusion embedding between substructures.
## Main Results
* `L.Substructure M` forms a `CompleteLattice`.
-/
universe u v w
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {M : Type w} {N P : Type*}
variable [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
open FirstOrder Cardinal
open Structure Cardinal
section ClosedUnder
open Set
variable {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n) (s : Set M)
/-- Indicates that a set in a given structure is a closed under a function symbol. -/
def ClosedUnder : Prop :=
∀ x : Fin n → M, (∀ i : Fin n, x i ∈ s) → funMap f x ∈ s
#align first_order.language.closed_under FirstOrder.Language.ClosedUnder
variable (L)
@[simp]
theorem closedUnder_univ : ClosedUnder f (univ : Set M) := fun _ _ => mem_univ _
#align first_order.language.closed_under_univ FirstOrder.Language.closedUnder_univ
variable {L f s} {t : Set M}
namespace ClosedUnder
theorem inter (hs : ClosedUnder f s) (ht : ClosedUnder f t) : ClosedUnder f (s ∩ t) := fun x h =>
mem_inter (hs x fun i => mem_of_mem_inter_left (h i)) (ht x fun i => mem_of_mem_inter_right (h i))
#align first_order.language.closed_under.inter FirstOrder.Language.ClosedUnder.inter
theorem inf (hs : ClosedUnder f s) (ht : ClosedUnder f t) : ClosedUnder f (s ⊓ t) :=
hs.inter ht
#align first_order.language.closed_under.inf FirstOrder.Language.ClosedUnder.inf
variable {S : Set (Set M)}
theorem sInf (hS : ∀ s, s ∈ S → ClosedUnder f s) : ClosedUnder f (sInf S) := fun x h s hs =>
hS s hs x fun i => h i s hs
#align first_order.language.closed_under.Inf FirstOrder.Language.ClosedUnder.sInf
end ClosedUnder
end ClosedUnder
variable (L) (M)
/-- A substructure of a structure `M` is a set closed under application of function symbols. -/
structure Substructure where
carrier : Set M
fun_mem : ∀ {n}, ∀ f : L.Functions n, ClosedUnder f carrier
#align first_order.language.substructure FirstOrder.Language.Substructure
#align first_order.language.substructure.carrier FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.carrier
#align first_order.language.substructure.fun_mem FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.fun_mem
variable {L} {M}
namespace Substructure
attribute [coe] Substructure.carrier
instance instSetLike : SetLike (L.Substructure M) M :=
⟨Substructure.carrier, fun p q h => by cases p; cases q; congr⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.set_like FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.instSetLike
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.coe (S : L.Substructure M) : Set M :=
S
#align first_order.language.substructure.simps.coe FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.Simps.coe
initialize_simps_projections Substructure (carrier → coe)
@[simp]
theorem mem_carrier {s : L.Substructure M} {x : M} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_carrier FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_carrier
/-- Two substructures are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : L.Substructure M} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align first_order.language.substructure.ext FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.ext
/-- Copy a substructure replacing `carrier` with a set that is equal to it. -/
protected def copy (S : L.Substructure M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = S) : L.Substructure M where
carrier := s
fun_mem _ f := hs.symm ▸ S.fun_mem _ f
#align first_order.language.substructure.copy FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.copy
end Substructure
variable {S : L.Substructure M}
theorem Term.realize_mem {α : Type*} (t : L.Term α) (xs : α → M) (h : ∀ a, xs a ∈ S) :
t.realize xs ∈ S := by
induction' t with a n f ts ih
· exact h a
· exact Substructure.fun_mem _ _ _ ih
#align first_order.language.term.realize_mem FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_mem
namespace Substructure
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy {s : Set M} (hs : s = S) : (S.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_copy FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq {s : Set M} (hs : s = S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align first_order.language.substructure.copy_eq FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.copy_eq
theorem constants_mem (c : L.Constants) : (c : M) ∈ S :=
mem_carrier.2 (S.fun_mem c _ finZeroElim)
#align first_order.language.substructure.constants_mem FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.constants_mem
/-- The substructure `M` of the structure `M`. -/
instance instTop : Top (L.Substructure M) :=
⟨{ carrier := Set.univ
fun_mem := fun {_} _ _ _ => Set.mem_univ _ }⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.has_top FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.instTop
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (L.Substructure M) :=
⟨⊤⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.inhabited FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.instInhabited
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : M) : x ∈ (⊤ : L.Substructure M) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_top FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : L.Substructure M) : Set M) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_top FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coe_top
/-- The inf of two substructures is their intersection. -/
instance instInf : Inf (L.Substructure M) :=
⟨fun S₁ S₂ =>
{ carrier := (S₁ : Set M) ∩ (S₂ : Set M)
fun_mem := fun {_} f => (S₁.fun_mem f).inf (S₂.fun_mem f) }⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.has_inf FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.instInf
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : L.Substructure M) :
((p ⊓ p' : L.Substructure M) : Set M) = (p : Set M) ∩ (p' : Set M) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_inf FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coe_inf
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : L.Substructure M} {x : M} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_inf FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_inf
instance instInfSet : InfSet (L.Substructure M) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ carrier := ⋂ t ∈ s, (t : Set M)
fun_mem := fun {n} f =>
ClosedUnder.sInf
(by
rintro _ ⟨t, rfl⟩
by_cases h : t ∈ s
· simpa [h] using t.fun_mem f
· simp [h]) }⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.has_Inf FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.instInfSet
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (L.Substructure M)) :
((sInf S : L.Substructure M) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_Inf FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coe_sInf
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (L.Substructure M)} {x : M} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_Inf FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_sInf
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → L.Substructure M} {x : M} :
(x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_infi FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_iInf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → L.Substructure M} :
((⨅ i, S i : L.Substructure M) : Set M) = ⋂ i, (S i : Set M) := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_infi FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coe_iInf
/-- Substructures of a structure form a complete lattice. -/
instance instCompleteLattice : CompleteLattice (L.Substructure M) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (L.Substructure M) fun _ =>
IsGLB.of_image
(fun {S T : L.Substructure M} => show (S : Set M) ≤ T ↔ S ≤ T from SetLike.coe_subset_coe)
isGLB_biInf with
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ x _ => mem_top x
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
sInf := InfSet.sInf
le_inf := fun _a _b _c ha hb _x hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right }
#align first_order.language.substructure.complete_lattice FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.instCompleteLattice
variable (L)
/-- The `L.Substructure` generated by a set. -/
def closure : LowerAdjoint ((↑) : L.Substructure M → Set M) :=
⟨fun s => sInf { S | s ⊆ S }, fun _ _ =>
⟨Set.Subset.trans fun _x hx => mem_sInf.2 fun _S hS => hS hx, fun h => sInf_le h⟩⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure
variable {L} {s : Set M}
theorem mem_closure {x : M} : x ∈ closure L s ↔ ∀ S : L.Substructure M, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_closure FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_closure
/-- The substructure generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp]
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure L s :=
(closure L).le_closure s
#align first_order.language.substructure.subset_closure FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : M} (hP : P ∉ closure L s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align first_order.language.substructure.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
@[simp]
theorem closed (S : L.Substructure M) : (closure L).closed (S : Set M) :=
congr rfl ((closure L).eq_of_le Set.Subset.rfl fun _x xS => mem_closure.2 fun _T hT => hT xS)
#align first_order.language.substructure.closed FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closed
open Set
/-- A substructure `S` includes `closure L s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_le : closure L s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
(closure L).closure_le_closed_iff_le s S.closed
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_le FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_le
/-- Substructure closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure L s ≤ closure L t`. -/
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set M⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure L s ≤ closure L t :=
(closure L).monotone h
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_mono FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_mono
theorem closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : s ⊆ S) (h₂ : S ≤ closure L s) : closure L s = S :=
(closure L).eq_of_le h₁ h₂
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_eq_of_le FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_eq_of_le
theorem coe_closure_eq_range_term_realize :
(closure L s : Set M) = range (@Term.realize L _ _ _ ((↑) : s → M)) := by
let S : L.Substructure M := ⟨range (Term.realize (L := L) ((↑) : s → M)), fun {n} f x hx => by
simp only [mem_range] at *
refine ⟨func f fun i => Classical.choose (hx i), ?_⟩
simp only [Term.realize, fun i => Classical.choose_spec (hx i)]⟩
change _ = (S : Set M)
rw [← SetLike.ext'_iff]
refine closure_eq_of_le (fun x hx => ⟨var ⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩) (le_sInf fun S' hS' => ?_)
rintro _ ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact t.realize_mem _ fun i => hS' i.2
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_closure_eq_range_term_realize FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coe_closure_eq_range_term_realize
instance small_closure [Small.{u} s] : Small.{u} (closure L s) := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_sort_coe, Substructure.coe_closure_eq_range_term_realize]
exact small_range _
#align first_order.language.substructure.small_closure FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.small_closure
theorem mem_closure_iff_exists_term {x : M} :
x ∈ closure L s ↔ ∃ t : L.Term s, t.realize ((↑) : s → M) = x := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_closure_eq_range_term_realize, mem_range]
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_closure_iff_exists_term FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_closure_iff_exists_term
theorem lift_card_closure_le_card_term : Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(closure L s) ≤ #(L.Term s) := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_sort_coe, coe_closure_eq_range_term_realize]
rw [← Cardinal.lift_id'.{w, max u w} #(L.Term s)]
exact Cardinal.mk_range_le_lift
#align first_order.language.substructure.lift_card_closure_le_card_term FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.lift_card_closure_le_card_term
theorem lift_card_closure_le :
Cardinal.lift.{u, w} #(closure L s) ≤
max ℵ₀ (Cardinal.lift.{u, w} #s + Cardinal.lift.{w, u} #(Σi, L.Functions i)) := by
rw [← lift_umax]
refine lift_card_closure_le_card_term.trans (Term.card_le.trans ?_)
rw [mk_sum, lift_umax.{w, u}]
#align first_order.language.substructure.lift_card_closure_le FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.lift_card_closure_le
variable (L)
theorem _root_.Set.Countable.substructure_closure
[Countable (Σl, L.Functions l)] (h : s.Countable) : Countable.{w + 1} (closure L s) := by
haveI : Countable s := h.to_subtype
rw [← mk_le_aleph0_iff, ← lift_le_aleph0]
exact lift_card_closure_le_card_term.trans mk_le_aleph0
#align set.countable.substructure_closure Set.Countable.substructure_closure
variable {L} (S)
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for all elements of `s`, and
is preserved under function symbols, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure of `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {p : M → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure L s) (Hs : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(Hfun : ∀ {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n), ClosedUnder f (setOf p)) : p x :=
(@closure_le L M _ ⟨setOf p, fun {_} => Hfun⟩ _).2 Hs h
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_induction FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_induction
/-- If `s` is a dense set in a structure `M`, `Substructure.closure L s = ⊤`, then in order to prove
that some predicate `p` holds for all `x : M` it suffices to verify `p x` for `x ∈ s`, and verify
that `p` is preserved under function symbols. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem dense_induction {p : M → Prop} (x : M) {s : Set M} (hs : closure L s = ⊤)
(Hs : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (Hfun : ∀ {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n), ClosedUnder f (setOf p)) : p x := by
have : ∀ x ∈ closure L s, p x := fun x hx => closure_induction hx Hs fun {n} => Hfun
simpa [hs] using this x
#align first_order.language.substructure.dense_induction FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.dense_induction
variable (L) (M)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure L M _) (↑) where
choice s _ := closure L s
gc := (closure L).gc
le_l_u _ := subset_closure
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.gi FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.gi
variable {L} {M}
/-- Closure of a substructure `S` equals `S`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_eq : closure L (S : Set M) = S :=
(Substructure.gi L M).l_u_eq S
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_eq FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_eq
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure L (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(Substructure.gi L M).gc.l_bot
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_empty FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_empty
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure L (univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top L M _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_univ FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_univ
theorem closure_union (s t : Set M) : closure L (s ∪ t) = closure L s ⊔ closure L t :=
(Substructure.gi L M).gc.l_sup
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_union FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_union
theorem closure_unionᵢ {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : closure L (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure L (s i) :=
(Substructure.gi L M).gc.l_iSup
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_Union FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_unionᵢ
instance small_bot : Small.{u} (⊥ : L.Substructure M) := by
rw [← closure_empty]
haveI : Small.{u} (∅ : Set M) := small_subsingleton _
exact Substructure.small_closure
#align first_order.language.substructure.small_bot FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.small_bot
/-!
### `comap` and `map`
-/
/-- The preimage of a substructure along a homomorphism is a substructure. -/
@[simps]
def comap (φ : M →[L] N) (S : L.Substructure N) : L.Substructure M where
carrier := φ ⁻¹' S
fun_mem {n} f x hx := by
rw [mem_preimage, φ.map_fun]
exact S.fun_mem f (φ ∘ x) hx
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_coe FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {S : L.Substructure N} {f : M →[L] N} {x : M} : x ∈ S.comap f ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_comap
theorem comap_comap (S : L.Substructure P) (g : N →[L] P) (f : M →[L] N) :
(S.comap g).comap f = S.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id (S : L.Substructure P) : S.comap (Hom.id _ _) = S :=
ext (by simp)
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_id FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_id
/-- The image of a substructure along a homomorphism is a substructure. -/
@[simps]
def map (φ : M →[L] N) (S : L.Substructure M) : L.Substructure N where
carrier := φ '' S
fun_mem {n} f x hx :=
(mem_image _ _ _).1
⟨funMap f fun i => Classical.choose (hx i),
S.fun_mem f _ fun i => (Classical.choose_spec (hx i)).1, by
simp only [Hom.map_fun, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => (Classical.choose_spec (hx i)).2)⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.map FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_coe FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : M →[L] N} {S : L.Substructure M} {y : N} :
y ∈ S.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_map FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_map
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : M →[L] N) {S : L.Substructure M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ S) : f x ∈ S.map f :=
mem_image_of_mem f hx
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_map_of_mem FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_map_of_mem
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : M →[L] N) (S : L.Substructure M) (x : S) : f x ∈ S.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
#align first_order.language.substructure.apply_coe_mem_map FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.apply_coe_mem_map
theorem map_map (g : N →[L] P) (f : M →[L] N) : (S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_image _ _ _
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_map FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : M →[L] N} {S : L.Substructure M} {T : L.Substructure N} :
S.map f ≤ T ↔ S ≤ T.comap f :=
image_subset_iff
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_le_iff_le_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (f : M →[L] N) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align first_order.language.substructure.gc_map_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.gc_map_comap
theorem map_le_of_le_comap {T : L.Substructure N} {f : M →[L] N} : S ≤ T.comap f → S.map f ≤ T :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_le_of_le_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_le_of_le_comap
theorem le_comap_of_map_le {T : L.Substructure N} {f : M →[L] N} : S.map f ≤ T → S ≤ T.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
#align first_order.language.substructure.le_comap_of_map_le FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.le_comap_of_map_le
theorem le_comap_map {f : M →[L] N} : S ≤ (S.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align first_order.language.substructure.le_comap_map FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.le_comap_map
theorem map_comap_le {S : L.Substructure N} {f : M →[L] N} : (S.comap f).map f ≤ S :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_comap_le FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_comap_le
theorem monotone_map {f : M →[L] N} : Monotone (map f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
#align first_order.language.substructure.monotone_map FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.monotone_map
theorem monotone_comap {f : M →[L] N} : Monotone (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_u
#align first_order.language.substructure.monotone_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.monotone_comap
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map {f : M →[L] N} : ((S.map f).comap f).map f = S.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l _
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_comap_map FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_comap_map
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap {S : L.Substructure N} {f : M →[L] N} :
((S.comap f).map f).comap f = S.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u _
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_map_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_map_comap
theorem map_sup (S T : L.Substructure M) (f : M →[L] N) : (S ⊔ T).map f = S.map f ⊔ T.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_sup FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_sup
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : M →[L] N) (s : ι → L.Substructure M) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_supr FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_iSup
theorem comap_inf (S T : L.Substructure N) (f : M →[L] N) :
(S ⊓ T).comap f = S.comap f ⊓ T.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_inf FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_inf
theorem comap_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : M →[L] N) (s : ι → L.Substructure N) :
(iInf s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_iInf
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_infi FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_iInf
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : M →[L] N) : (⊥ : L.Substructure M).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_bot FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem comap_top (f : M →[L] N) : (⊤ : L.Substructure N).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_top FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_top
@[simp]
theorem map_id (S : L.Substructure M) : S.map (Hom.id L M) = S :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨_, h, rfl⟩⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_id FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_id
theorem map_closure (f : M →[L] N) (s : Set M) : (closure L s).map f = closure L (f '' s) :=
Eq.symm <|
closure_eq_of_le (Set.image_subset f subset_closure) <|
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le.2 fun x hx => subset_closure ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_closure FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_closure
@[simp]
theorem closure_image (f : M →[L] N) : closure L (f '' s) = map f (closure L s) :=
(map_closure f s).symm
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_image FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_image
section GaloisCoinsertion
variable {ι : Type*} {f : M →[L] N} (hf : Function.Injective f)
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective. -/
def gciMapComap : GaloisCoinsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisCoinsertion fun S x => by simp [mem_comap, mem_map, hf.eq_iff]
#align first_order.language.substructure.gci_map_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.gciMapComap
theorem comap_map_eq_of_injective (S : L.Substructure M) : (S.map f).comap f = S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_l_eq _
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_map_eq_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_map_eq_of_injective
theorem comap_surjective_of_injective : Function.Surjective (comap f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_surjective
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_surjective_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_surjective_of_injective
theorem map_injective_of_injective : Function.Injective (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_injective
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_injective_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_injective_of_injective
theorem comap_inf_map_of_injective (S T : L.Substructure M) : (S.map f ⊓ T.map f).comap f = S ⊓ T :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_inf_l _ _
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_inf_map_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_inf_map_of_injective
theorem comap_iInf_map_of_injective (S : ι → L.Substructure M) :
(⨅ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iInf S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iInf_l _
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_infi_map_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_iInf_map_of_injective
theorem comap_sup_map_of_injective (S T : L.Substructure M) : (S.map f ⊔ T.map f).comap f = S ⊔ T :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_sup_l _ _
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_sup_map_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_sup_map_of_injective
theorem comap_iSup_map_of_injective (S : ι → L.Substructure M) :
(⨆ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iSup S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iSup_l _
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_supr_map_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_iSup_map_of_injective
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injective {S T : L.Substructure M} : S.map f ≤ T.map f ↔ S ≤ T :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_le_l_iff
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_le_map_iff_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_le_map_iff_of_injective
theorem map_strictMono_of_injective : StrictMono (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).strictMono_l
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_strict_mono_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_strictMono_of_injective
end GaloisCoinsertion
section GaloisInsertion
variable {ι : Type*} {f : M →[L] N} (hf : Function.Surjective f)
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective. -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisInsertion fun S x h =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
mem_map.2 ⟨y, by simp [hy, h]⟩
#align first_order.language.substructure.gi_map_comap FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.giMapComap
theorem map_comap_eq_of_surjective (S : L.Substructure N) : (S.comap f).map f = S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_u_eq _
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_comap_eq_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_comap_eq_of_surjective
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Function.Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap hf).l_surjective
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_surjective_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_surjective_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Function.Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).u_injective
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_injective_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_injective_of_surjective
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (S T : L.Substructure N) :
(S.comap f ⊓ T.comap f).map f = S ⊓ T :=
(giMapComap hf).l_inf_u _ _
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_inf_comap_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_inf_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (S : ι → L.Substructure N) :
(⨅ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iInf S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iInf_u _
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_infi_comap_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_iInf_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (S T : L.Substructure N) :
(S.comap f ⊔ T.comap f).map f = S ⊔ T :=
(giMapComap hf).l_sup_u _ _
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_sup_comap_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_sup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (S : ι → L.Substructure N) :
(⨆ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iSup S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iSup_u _
#align first_order.language.substructure.map_supr_comap_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.map_iSup_comap_of_surjective
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective {S T : L.Substructure N} : S.comap f ≤ T.comap f ↔ S ≤ T :=
(giMapComap hf).u_le_u_iff
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective
theorem comap_strictMono_of_surjective : StrictMono (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).strictMono_u
#align first_order.language.substructure.comap_strict_mono_of_surjective FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.comap_strictMono_of_surjective
end GaloisInsertion
instance inducedStructure {S : L.Substructure M} : L.Structure S where
funMap {_} f x := ⟨funMap f fun i => x i, S.fun_mem f (fun i => x i) fun i => (x i).2⟩
RelMap {_} r x := RelMap r fun i => (x i : M)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.substructure.induced_Structure FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.inducedStructure
/-- The natural embedding of an `L.Substructure` of `M` into `M`. -/
def subtype (S : L.Substructure M) : S ↪[L] M where
toFun := (↑)
inj' := Subtype.coe_injective
#align first_order.language.substructure.subtype FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coeSubtype : ⇑S.subtype = ((↑) : S → M) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_subtype FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coeSubtype
/-- The equivalence between the maximal substructure of a structure and the structure itself. -/
def topEquiv : (⊤ : L.Substructure M) ≃[L] M where
toFun := subtype ⊤
invFun m := ⟨m, mem_top m⟩
left_inv m := by simp
right_inv m := rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.top_equiv FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.topEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_topEquiv :
⇑(topEquiv : (⊤ : L.Substructure M) ≃[L] M) = ((↑) : (⊤ : L.Substructure M) → M) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_top_equiv FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coe_topEquiv
@[simp]
theorem realize_boundedFormula_top {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
{v : α → (⊤ : L.Substructure M)} {xs : Fin n → (⊤ : L.Substructure M)} :
φ.Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (((↑) : _ → M) ∘ v) ((↑) ∘ xs) := by
rw [← Substructure.topEquiv.realize_boundedFormula φ]
simp
#align first_order.language.substructure.realize_bounded_formula_top FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.realize_boundedFormula_top
@[simp]
theorem realize_formula_top {α : Type*} {φ : L.Formula α} {v : α → (⊤ : L.Substructure M)} :
φ.Realize v ↔ φ.Realize (((↑) : (⊤ : L.Substructure M) → M) ∘ v) := by
rw [← Substructure.topEquiv.realize_formula φ]
simp
#align first_order.language.substructure.realize_formula_top FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.realize_formula_top
/-- A dependent version of `Substructure.closure_induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction' (s : Set M) {p : ∀ x, x ∈ closure L s → Prop}
(Hs : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_closure h))
(Hfun : ∀ {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n), ClosedUnder f { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }) {x}
(hx : x ∈ closure L s) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ closure L s) (hc : p x hx) => hc
exact closure_induction hx (fun x hx => ⟨subset_closure hx, Hs x hx⟩) @Hfun
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_induction' FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_induction'
end Substructure
namespace LHom
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Substructure
variable {L' : Language} [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
/-- Reduces the language of a substructure along a language hom. -/
def substructureReduct : L'.Substructure M ↪o L.Substructure M where
toFun S :=
{ carrier := S
fun_mem := fun {n} f x hx => by
have h := S.fun_mem (φ.onFunction f) x hx
simp only [LHom.map_onFunction, Substructure.mem_carrier] at h
exact h }
inj' S T h := by
simp only [SetLike.coe_set_eq, Substructure.mk.injEq] at h
exact h
map_rel_iff' {S T} := Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.Lhom.substructure_reduct FirstOrder.Language.LHom.substructureReduct
@[simp]
theorem mem_substructureReduct {x : M} {S : L'.Substructure M} :
x ∈ φ.substructureReduct S ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.Lhom.mem_substructure_reduct FirstOrder.Language.LHom.mem_substructureReduct
@[simp]
theorem coe_substructureReduct {S : L'.Substructure M} : (φ.substructureReduct S : Set M) = ↑S :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.Lhom.coe_substructure_reduct FirstOrder.Language.LHom.coe_substructureReduct
end LHom
namespace Substructure
/-- Turns any substructure containing a constant set `A` into a `L[[A]]`-substructure. -/
def withConstants (S : L.Substructure M) {A : Set M} (h : A ⊆ S) : L[[A]].Substructure M where
carrier := S
fun_mem {n} f := by
cases' f with f f
· exact S.fun_mem f
· cases n
· exact fun _ _ => h f.2
· exact isEmptyElim f
#align first_order.language.substructure.with_constants FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.withConstants
variable {A : Set M} {s : Set M} (h : A ⊆ S)
@[simp]
theorem mem_withConstants {x : M} : x ∈ S.withConstants h ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.mem_with_constants FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.mem_withConstants
@[simp]
theorem coe_withConstants : (S.withConstants h : Set M) = ↑S :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.substructure.coe_with_constants FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.coe_withConstants
@[simp]
theorem reduct_withConstants :
(L.lhomWithConstants A).substructureReduct (S.withConstants h) = S := by
ext
simp
#align first_order.language.substructure.reduct_with_constants FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.reduct_withConstants
theorem subset_closure_withConstants : A ⊆ closure (L[[A]]) s := by
intro a ha
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]
let a' : L[[A]].Constants := Sum.inr ⟨a, ha⟩
exact constants_mem a'
#align first_order.language.substructure.subset_closure_with_constants FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.subset_closure_withConstants
theorem closure_withConstants_eq :
closure (L[[A]]) s =
(closure L (A ∪ s)).withConstants ((A.subset_union_left).trans subset_closure) := by
refine closure_eq_of_le ((A.subset_union_right).trans subset_closure) ?_
rw [← (L.lhomWithConstants A).substructureReduct.le_iff_le]
simp only [subset_closure, reduct_withConstants, closure_le, LHom.coe_substructureReduct,
Set.union_subset_iff, and_true_iff]
exact subset_closure_withConstants
#align first_order.language.substructure.closure_with_constants_eq FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.closure_withConstants_eq
end Substructure
namespace Hom
open Substructure
/-- The restriction of a first-order hom to a substructure `s ⊆ M` gives a hom `s → N`. -/
@[simps!]
def domRestrict (f : M →[L] N) (p : L.Substructure M) : p →[L] N :=
f.comp p.subtype.toHom
#align first_order.language.hom.dom_restrict FirstOrder.Language.Hom.domRestrict
#align first_order.language.hom.dom_restrict_to_fun FirstOrder.Language.Hom.domRestrict_toFun
/-- A first-order hom `f : M → N` whose values lie in a substructure `p ⊆ N` can be restricted to a
hom `M → p`. -/
@[simps]
def codRestrict (p : L.Substructure N) (f : M →[L] N) (h : ∀ c, f c ∈ p) : M →[L] p where
toFun c := ⟨f c, h c⟩
map_fun' {n} f x := by aesop
map_rel' {n} R x h := f.map_rel R x h
#align first_order.language.hom.cod_restrict FirstOrder.Language.Hom.codRestrict
#align first_order.language.hom.cod_restrict_to_fun_coe FirstOrder.Language.Hom.codRestrict_toFun_coe
@[simp]
theorem comp_codRestrict (f : M →[L] N) (g : N →[L] P) (p : L.Substructure P) (h : ∀ b, g b ∈ p) :
((codRestrict p g h).comp f : M →[L] p) = codRestrict p (g.comp f) fun _ => h _ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.comp_cod_restrict FirstOrder.Language.Hom.comp_codRestrict
@[simp]
theorem subtype_comp_codRestrict (f : M →[L] N) (p : L.Substructure N) (h : ∀ b, f b ∈ p) :
p.subtype.toHom.comp (codRestrict p f h) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.subtype_comp_cod_restrict FirstOrder.Language.Hom.subtype_comp_codRestrict
/-- The range of a first-order hom `f : M → N` is a submodule of `N`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range (f : M →[L] N) : L.Substructure N :=
(map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
#align first_order.language.hom.range FirstOrder.Language.Hom.range
theorem range_coe (f : M →[L] N) : (range f : Set N) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.range_coe FirstOrder.Language.Hom.range_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {f : M →[L] N} {x} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.mem_range FirstOrder.Language.Hom.mem_range
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Substructures.lean | 848 | 850 | theorem range_eq_map (f : M →[L] N) : f.range = map f ⊤ := by |
ext
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
#align_import linear_algebra.basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"13bce9a6b6c44f6b4c91ac1c1d2a816e2533d395"
/-!
# Bases
This file defines bases in a module or vector space.
It is inspired by Isabelle/HOL's linear algebra, and hence indirectly by HOL Light.
## Main definitions
All definitions are given for families of vectors, i.e. `v : ι → M` where `M` is the module or
vector space and `ι : Type*` is an arbitrary indexing type.
* `Basis ι R M` is the type of `ι`-indexed `R`-bases for a module `M`,
represented by a linear equiv `M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R`.
* the basis vectors of a basis `b : Basis ι R M` are available as `b i`, where `i : ι`
* `Basis.repr` is the isomorphism sending `x : M` to its coordinates `Basis.repr x : ι →₀ R`.
The converse, turning this isomorphism into a basis, is called `Basis.ofRepr`.
* If `ι` is finite, there is a variant of `repr` called `Basis.equivFun b : M ≃ₗ[R] ι → R`
(saving you from having to work with `Finsupp`). The converse, turning this isomorphism into
a basis, is called `Basis.ofEquivFun`.
* `Basis.constr b R f` constructs a linear map `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` given the values `f : ι → M₂` at the
basis elements `⇑b : ι → M₁`.
* `Basis.reindex` uses an equiv to map a basis to a different indexing set.
* `Basis.map` uses a linear equiv to map a basis to a different module.
## Main statements
* `Basis.mk`: a linear independent set of vectors spanning the whole module determines a basis
* `Basis.ext` states that two linear maps are equal if they coincide on a basis.
Similar results are available for linear equivs (if they coincide on the basis vectors),
elements (if their coordinates coincide) and the functions `b.repr` and `⇑b`.
## Implementation notes
We use families instead of sets because it allows us to say that two identical vectors are linearly
dependent. For bases, this is useful as well because we can easily derive ordered bases by using an
ordered index type `ι`.
## Tags
basis, bases
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open Function Set Submodule
variable {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M' M'' : Type*} {V : Type u} {V' : Type*}
section Module
variable [Semiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
section
variable (ι R M)
/-- A `Basis ι R M` for a module `M` is the type of `ι`-indexed `R`-bases of `M`.
The basis vectors are available as `DFunLike.coe (b : Basis ι R M) : ι → M`.
To turn a linear independent family of vectors spanning `M` into a basis, use `Basis.mk`.
They are internally represented as linear equivs `M ≃ₗ[R] (ι →₀ R)`,
available as `Basis.repr`.
-/
structure Basis where
/-- `Basis.ofRepr` constructs a basis given an assignment of coordinates to each vector. -/
ofRepr ::
/-- `repr` is the linear equivalence sending a vector `x` to its coordinates:
the `c`s such that `x = ∑ i, c i`. -/
repr : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R
#align basis Basis
#align basis.repr Basis.repr
#align basis.of_repr Basis.ofRepr
end
instance uniqueBasis [Subsingleton R] : Unique (Basis ι R M) :=
⟨⟨⟨default⟩⟩, fun ⟨b⟩ => by rw [Subsingleton.elim b]⟩
#align unique_basis uniqueBasis
namespace Basis
instance : Inhabited (Basis ι R (ι →₀ R)) :=
⟨.ofRepr (LinearEquiv.refl _ _)⟩
variable (b b₁ : Basis ι R M) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M)
section repr
theorem repr_injective : Injective (repr : Basis ι R M → M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R) := fun f g h => by
cases f; cases g; congr
#align basis.repr_injective Basis.repr_injective
/-- `b i` is the `i`th basis vector. -/
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Basis ι R M) ι M where
coe b i := b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i 1)
coe_injective' f g h := repr_injective <| LinearEquiv.symm_bijective.injective <|
LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective <| by ext; exact congr_fun h _
#align basis.fun_like Basis.instFunLike
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofRepr (e : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R) : ⇑(ofRepr e) = fun i => e.symm (Finsupp.single i 1) :=
rfl
#align basis.coe_of_repr Basis.coe_ofRepr
protected theorem injective [Nontrivial R] : Injective b :=
b.repr.symm.injective.comp fun _ _ => (Finsupp.single_left_inj (one_ne_zero : (1 : R) ≠ 0)).mp
#align basis.injective Basis.injective
theorem repr_symm_single_one : b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i 1) = b i :=
rfl
#align basis.repr_symm_single_one Basis.repr_symm_single_one
theorem repr_symm_single : b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i c) = c • b i :=
calc
b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i c) = b.repr.symm (c • Finsupp.single i (1 : R)) := by
{ rw [Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one] }
_ = c • b i := by rw [LinearEquiv.map_smul, repr_symm_single_one]
#align basis.repr_symm_single Basis.repr_symm_single
@[simp]
theorem repr_self : b.repr (b i) = Finsupp.single i 1 :=
LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply _ _
#align basis.repr_self Basis.repr_self
theorem repr_self_apply (j) [Decidable (i = j)] : b.repr (b i) j = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
rw [repr_self, Finsupp.single_apply]
#align basis.repr_self_apply Basis.repr_self_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_symm_apply (v) : b.repr.symm v = Finsupp.total ι M R b v :=
calc
b.repr.symm v = b.repr.symm (v.sum Finsupp.single) := by simp
_ = v.sum fun i vi => b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i vi) := map_finsupp_sum ..
_ = Finsupp.total ι M R b v := by simp only [repr_symm_single, Finsupp.total_apply]
#align basis.repr_symm_apply Basis.repr_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_repr_symm : ↑b.repr.symm = Finsupp.total ι M R b :=
LinearMap.ext fun v => b.repr_symm_apply v
#align basis.coe_repr_symm Basis.coe_repr_symm
@[simp]
theorem repr_total (v) : b.repr (Finsupp.total _ _ _ b v) = v := by
rw [← b.coe_repr_symm]
exact b.repr.apply_symm_apply v
#align basis.repr_total Basis.repr_total
@[simp]
theorem total_repr : Finsupp.total _ _ _ b (b.repr x) = x := by
rw [← b.coe_repr_symm]
exact b.repr.symm_apply_apply x
#align basis.total_repr Basis.total_repr
theorem repr_range : LinearMap.range (b.repr : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R) = Finsupp.supported R R univ := by
rw [LinearEquiv.range, Finsupp.supported_univ]
#align basis.repr_range Basis.repr_range
theorem mem_span_repr_support (m : M) : m ∈ span R (b '' (b.repr m).support) :=
(Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total _).2 ⟨b.repr m, by simp [Finsupp.mem_supported_support]⟩
#align basis.mem_span_repr_support Basis.mem_span_repr_support
theorem repr_support_subset_of_mem_span (s : Set ι) {m : M}
(hm : m ∈ span R (b '' s)) : ↑(b.repr m).support ⊆ s := by
rcases (Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total _).1 hm with ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩
rwa [repr_total, ← Finsupp.mem_supported R l]
#align basis.repr_support_subset_of_mem_span Basis.repr_support_subset_of_mem_span
theorem mem_span_image {m : M} {s : Set ι} : m ∈ span R (b '' s) ↔ ↑(b.repr m).support ⊆ s :=
⟨repr_support_subset_of_mem_span _ _, fun h ↦
span_mono (image_subset _ h) (mem_span_repr_support b _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem self_mem_span_image [Nontrivial R] {i : ι} {s : Set ι} :
b i ∈ span R (b '' s) ↔ i ∈ s := by
simp [mem_span_image, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
end repr
section Coord
/-- `b.coord i` is the linear function giving the `i`'th coordinate of a vector
with respect to the basis `b`.
`b.coord i` is an element of the dual space. In particular, for
finite-dimensional spaces it is the `ι`th basis vector of the dual space.
-/
@[simps!]
def coord : M →ₗ[R] R :=
Finsupp.lapply i ∘ₗ ↑b.repr
#align basis.coord Basis.coord
theorem forall_coord_eq_zero_iff {x : M} : (∀ i, b.coord i x = 0) ↔ x = 0 :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [b.coord_apply, DFunLike.ext_iff, Finsupp.zero_apply])
b.repr.map_eq_zero_iff
#align basis.forall_coord_eq_zero_iff Basis.forall_coord_eq_zero_iff
/-- The sum of the coordinates of an element `m : M` with respect to a basis. -/
noncomputable def sumCoords : M →ₗ[R] R :=
(Finsupp.lsum ℕ fun _ => LinearMap.id) ∘ₗ (b.repr : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R)
#align basis.sum_coords Basis.sumCoords
@[simp]
theorem coe_sumCoords : (b.sumCoords : M → R) = fun m => (b.repr m).sum fun _ => id :=
rfl
#align basis.coe_sum_coords Basis.coe_sumCoords
theorem coe_sumCoords_eq_finsum : (b.sumCoords : M → R) = fun m => ∑ᶠ i, b.coord i m := by
ext m
simp only [Basis.sumCoords, Basis.coord, Finsupp.lapply_apply, LinearMap.id_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_comp,
finsum_eq_sum _ (b.repr m).finite_support, Finsupp.sum, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset, id,
Finsupp.fun_support_eq]
#align basis.coe_sum_coords_eq_finsum Basis.coe_sumCoords_eq_finsum
@[simp high]
theorem coe_sumCoords_of_fintype [Fintype ι] : (b.sumCoords : M → R) = ∑ i, b.coord i := by
ext m
-- Porting note: - `eq_self_iff_true`
-- + `comp_apply` `LinearMap.coeFn_sum`
simp only [sumCoords, Finsupp.sum_fintype, LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, coord_apply,
id, Fintype.sum_apply, imp_true_iff, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_comp, comp_apply,
LinearMap.coeFn_sum]
#align basis.coe_sum_coords_of_fintype Basis.coe_sumCoords_of_fintype
@[simp]
theorem sumCoords_self_apply : b.sumCoords (b i) = 1 := by
simp only [Basis.sumCoords, LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, id, Basis.repr_self,
Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_comp, Finsupp.sum_single_index]
#align basis.sum_coords_self_apply Basis.sumCoords_self_apply
theorem dvd_coord_smul (i : ι) (m : M) (r : R) : r ∣ b.coord i (r • m) :=
⟨b.coord i m, by simp⟩
#align basis.dvd_coord_smul Basis.dvd_coord_smul
theorem coord_repr_symm (b : Basis ι R M) (i : ι) (f : ι →₀ R) :
b.coord i (b.repr.symm f) = f i := by
simp only [repr_symm_apply, coord_apply, repr_total]
#align basis.coord_repr_symm Basis.coord_repr_symm
end Coord
section Ext
variable {R₁ : Type*} [Semiring R₁] {σ : R →+* R₁} {σ' : R₁ →+* R}
variable [RingHomInvPair σ σ'] [RingHomInvPair σ' σ]
variable {M₁ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
/-- Two linear maps are equal if they are equal on basis vectors. -/
theorem ext {f₁ f₂ : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₁} (h : ∀ i, f₁ (b i) = f₂ (b i)) : f₁ = f₂ := by
ext x
rw [← b.total_repr x, Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum]
simp only [map_sum, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, h]
#align basis.ext Basis.ext
/-- Two linear equivs are equal if they are equal on basis vectors. -/
theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : M ≃ₛₗ[σ] M₁} (h : ∀ i, f₁ (b i) = f₂ (b i)) : f₁ = f₂ := by
ext x
rw [← b.total_repr x, Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum]
simp only [map_sum, LinearEquiv.map_smulₛₗ, h]
#align basis.ext' Basis.ext'
/-- Two elements are equal iff their coordinates are equal. -/
theorem ext_elem_iff {x y : M} : x = y ↔ ∀ i, b.repr x i = b.repr y i := by
simp only [← DFunLike.ext_iff, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
#align basis.ext_elem_iff Basis.ext_elem_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Basis.ext_elem⟩ := ext_elem_iff
#align basis.ext_elem Basis.ext_elem
theorem repr_eq_iff {b : Basis ι R M} {f : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R} :
↑b.repr = f ↔ ∀ i, f (b i) = Finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨fun h i => h ▸ b.repr_self i, fun h => b.ext fun i => (b.repr_self i).trans (h i).symm⟩
#align basis.repr_eq_iff Basis.repr_eq_iff
theorem repr_eq_iff' {b : Basis ι R M} {f : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R} :
b.repr = f ↔ ∀ i, f (b i) = Finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨fun h i => h ▸ b.repr_self i, fun h => b.ext' fun i => (b.repr_self i).trans (h i).symm⟩
#align basis.repr_eq_iff' Basis.repr_eq_iff'
theorem apply_eq_iff {b : Basis ι R M} {x : M} {i : ι} : b i = x ↔ b.repr x = Finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ b.repr_self i, fun h => b.repr.injective ((b.repr_self i).trans h.symm)⟩
#align basis.apply_eq_iff Basis.apply_eq_iff
/-- An unbundled version of `repr_eq_iff` -/
theorem repr_apply_eq (f : M → ι → R) (hadd : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(hsmul : ∀ (c : R) (x : M), f (c • x) = c • f x) (f_eq : ∀ i, f (b i) = Finsupp.single i 1)
(x : M) (i : ι) : b.repr x i = f x i := by
let f_i : M →ₗ[R] R :=
{ toFun := fun x => f x i
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
map_add' := fun _ _ => by beta_reduce; rw [hadd, Pi.add_apply]
map_smul' := fun _ _ => by simp [hsmul, Pi.smul_apply] }
have : Finsupp.lapply i ∘ₗ ↑b.repr = f_i := by
refine b.ext fun j => ?_
show b.repr (b j) i = f (b j) i
rw [b.repr_self, f_eq]
calc
b.repr x i = f_i x := by
{ rw [← this]
rfl }
_ = f x i := rfl
#align basis.repr_apply_eq Basis.repr_apply_eq
/-- Two bases are equal if they assign the same coordinates. -/
theorem eq_ofRepr_eq_repr {b₁ b₂ : Basis ι R M} (h : ∀ x i, b₁.repr x i = b₂.repr x i) : b₁ = b₂ :=
repr_injective <| by ext; apply h
#align basis.eq_of_repr_eq_repr Basis.eq_ofRepr_eq_repr
/-- Two bases are equal if their basis vectors are the same. -/
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_apply_eq {b₁ b₂ : Basis ι R M} : (∀ i, b₁ i = b₂ i) → b₁ = b₂ :=
DFunLike.ext _ _
#align basis.eq_of_apply_eq Basis.eq_of_apply_eq
end Ext
section Map
variable (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M')
/-- Apply the linear equivalence `f` to the basis vectors. -/
@[simps]
protected def map : Basis ι R M' :=
ofRepr (f.symm.trans b.repr)
#align basis.map Basis.map
@[simp]
theorem map_apply (i) : b.map f i = f (b i) :=
rfl
#align basis.map_apply Basis.map_apply
theorem coe_map : (b.map f : ι → M') = f ∘ b :=
rfl
end Map
section MapCoeffs
variable {R' : Type*} [Semiring R'] [Module R' M] (f : R ≃+* R')
(h : ∀ (c) (x : M), f c • x = c • x)
attribute [local instance] SMul.comp.isScalarTower
/-- If `R` and `R'` are isomorphic rings that act identically on a module `M`,
then a basis for `M` as `R`-module is also a basis for `M` as `R'`-module.
See also `Basis.algebraMapCoeffs` for the case where `f` is equal to `algebraMap`.
-/
@[simps (config := { simpRhs := true })]
def mapCoeffs : Basis ι R' M := by
letI : Module R' R := Module.compHom R (↑f.symm : R' →+* R)
haveI : IsScalarTower R' R M :=
{ smul_assoc := fun x y z => by
-- Porting note: `dsimp [(· • ·)]` is unavailable because
-- `HSMul.hsmul` becomes `SMul.smul`.
change (f.symm x * y) • z = x • (y • z)
rw [mul_smul, ← h, f.apply_symm_apply] }
exact ofRepr <| (b.repr.restrictScalars R').trans <|
Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv (Module.compHom.toLinearEquiv f.symm).symm
#align basis.map_coeffs Basis.mapCoeffs
theorem mapCoeffs_apply (i : ι) : b.mapCoeffs f h i = b i :=
apply_eq_iff.mpr <| by
-- Porting note: in Lean 3, these were automatically inferred from the definition of
-- `mapCoeffs`.
letI : Module R' R := Module.compHom R (↑f.symm : R' →+* R)
haveI : IsScalarTower R' R M :=
{ smul_assoc := fun x y z => by
-- Porting note: `dsimp [(· • ·)]` is unavailable because
-- `HSMul.hsmul` becomes `SMul.smul`.
change (f.symm x * y) • z = x • (y • z)
rw [mul_smul, ← h, f.apply_symm_apply] }
simp
#align basis.map_coeffs_apply Basis.mapCoeffs_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapCoeffs : (b.mapCoeffs f h : ι → M) = b :=
funext <| b.mapCoeffs_apply f h
#align basis.coe_map_coeffs Basis.coe_mapCoeffs
end MapCoeffs
section Reindex
variable (b' : Basis ι' R M')
variable (e : ι ≃ ι')
/-- `b.reindex (e : ι ≃ ι')` is a basis indexed by `ι'` -/
def reindex : Basis ι' R M :=
.ofRepr (b.repr.trans (Finsupp.domLCongr e))
#align basis.reindex Basis.reindex
theorem reindex_apply (i' : ι') : b.reindex e i' = b (e.symm i') :=
show (b.repr.trans (Finsupp.domLCongr e)).symm (Finsupp.single i' 1) =
b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single (e.symm i') 1)
by rw [LinearEquiv.symm_trans_apply, Finsupp.domLCongr_symm, Finsupp.domLCongr_single]
#align basis.reindex_apply Basis.reindex_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_reindex : (b.reindex e : ι' → M) = b ∘ e.symm :=
funext (b.reindex_apply e)
#align basis.coe_reindex Basis.coe_reindex
theorem repr_reindex_apply (i' : ι') : (b.reindex e).repr x i' = b.repr x (e.symm i') :=
show (Finsupp.domLCongr e : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) (b.repr x) i' = _ by simp
#align basis.repr_reindex_apply Basis.repr_reindex_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_reindex : (b.reindex e).repr x = (b.repr x).mapDomain e :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ <| by simp [repr_reindex_apply]
#align basis.repr_reindex Basis.repr_reindex
@[simp]
theorem reindex_refl : b.reindex (Equiv.refl ι) = b :=
eq_of_apply_eq fun i => by simp
#align basis.reindex_refl Basis.reindex_refl
/-- `simp` can prove this as `Basis.coe_reindex` + `EquivLike.range_comp` -/
theorem range_reindex : Set.range (b.reindex e) = Set.range b := by
simp [coe_reindex, range_comp]
#align basis.range_reindex Basis.range_reindex
@[simp]
theorem sumCoords_reindex : (b.reindex e).sumCoords = b.sumCoords := by
ext x
simp only [coe_sumCoords, repr_reindex]
exact Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index (fun _ => rfl) fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align basis.sum_coords_reindex Basis.sumCoords_reindex
/-- `b.reindex_range` is a basis indexed by `range b`, the basis vectors themselves. -/
def reindexRange : Basis (range b) R M :=
haveI := Classical.dec (Nontrivial R)
if h : Nontrivial R then
letI := h
b.reindex (Equiv.ofInjective b (Basis.injective b))
else
letI : Subsingleton R := not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp h
.ofRepr (Module.subsingletonEquiv R M (range b))
#align basis.reindex_range Basis.reindexRange
theorem reindexRange_self (i : ι) (h := Set.mem_range_self i) : b.reindexRange ⟨b i, h⟩ = b i := by
by_cases htr : Nontrivial R
· letI := htr
simp [htr, reindexRange, reindex_apply, Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm b.injective,
Subtype.coe_mk]
· letI : Subsingleton R := not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp htr
letI := Module.subsingleton R M
simp [reindexRange, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align basis.reindex_range_self Basis.reindexRange_self
theorem reindexRange_repr_self (i : ι) :
b.reindexRange.repr (b i) = Finsupp.single ⟨b i, mem_range_self i⟩ 1 :=
calc
b.reindexRange.repr (b i) = b.reindexRange.repr (b.reindexRange ⟨b i, mem_range_self i⟩) :=
congr_arg _ (b.reindexRange_self _ _).symm
_ = Finsupp.single ⟨b i, mem_range_self i⟩ 1 := b.reindexRange.repr_self _
#align basis.reindex_range_repr_self Basis.reindexRange_repr_self
@[simp]
theorem reindexRange_apply (x : range b) : b.reindexRange x = x := by
rcases x with ⟨bi, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩
exact b.reindexRange_self i
#align basis.reindex_range_apply Basis.reindexRange_apply
theorem reindexRange_repr' (x : M) {bi : M} {i : ι} (h : b i = bi) :
b.reindexRange.repr x ⟨bi, ⟨i, h⟩⟩ = b.repr x i := by
nontriviality
subst h
apply (b.repr_apply_eq (fun x i => b.reindexRange.repr x ⟨b i, _⟩) _ _ _ x i).symm
· intro x y
ext i
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearEquiv.map_add, Finsupp.coe_add]
· intro c x
ext i
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearEquiv.map_smul, Finsupp.coe_smul]
· intro i
ext j
simp only [reindexRange_repr_self]
apply Finsupp.single_apply_left (f := fun i => (⟨b i, _⟩ : Set.range b))
exact fun i j h => b.injective (Subtype.mk.inj h)
#align basis.reindex_range_repr' Basis.reindexRange_repr'
@[simp]
theorem reindexRange_repr (x : M) (i : ι) (h := Set.mem_range_self i) :
b.reindexRange.repr x ⟨b i, h⟩ = b.repr x i :=
b.reindexRange_repr' _ rfl
#align basis.reindex_range_repr Basis.reindexRange_repr
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq M]
/-- `b.reindexFinsetRange` is a basis indexed by `Finset.univ.image b`,
the finite set of basis vectors themselves. -/
def reindexFinsetRange : Basis (Finset.univ.image b) R M :=
b.reindexRange.reindex ((Equiv.refl M).subtypeEquiv (by simp))
#align basis.reindex_finset_range Basis.reindexFinsetRange
theorem reindexFinsetRange_self (i : ι) (h := Finset.mem_image_of_mem b (Finset.mem_univ i)) :
b.reindexFinsetRange ⟨b i, h⟩ = b i := by
rw [reindexFinsetRange, reindex_apply, reindexRange_apply]
rfl
#align basis.reindex_finset_range_self Basis.reindexFinsetRange_self
@[simp]
theorem reindexFinsetRange_apply (x : Finset.univ.image b) : b.reindexFinsetRange x = x := by
rcases x with ⟨bi, hbi⟩
rcases Finset.mem_image.mp hbi with ⟨i, -, rfl⟩
exact b.reindexFinsetRange_self i
#align basis.reindex_finset_range_apply Basis.reindexFinsetRange_apply
theorem reindexFinsetRange_repr_self (i : ι) :
b.reindexFinsetRange.repr (b i) =
Finsupp.single ⟨b i, Finset.mem_image_of_mem b (Finset.mem_univ i)⟩ 1 := by
ext ⟨bi, hbi⟩
rw [reindexFinsetRange, repr_reindex, Finsupp.mapDomain_equiv_apply, reindexRange_repr_self]
-- Porting note: replaced a `convert; refl` with `simp`
simp [Finsupp.single_apply]
#align basis.reindex_finset_range_repr_self Basis.reindexFinsetRange_repr_self
@[simp]
theorem reindexFinsetRange_repr (x : M) (i : ι)
(h := Finset.mem_image_of_mem b (Finset.mem_univ i)) :
b.reindexFinsetRange.repr x ⟨b i, h⟩ = b.repr x i := by simp [reindexFinsetRange]
#align basis.reindex_finset_range_repr Basis.reindexFinsetRange_repr
end Fintype
end Reindex
protected theorem linearIndependent : LinearIndependent R b :=
linearIndependent_iff.mpr fun l hl =>
calc
l = b.repr (Finsupp.total _ _ _ b l) := (b.repr_total l).symm
_ = 0 := by rw [hl, LinearEquiv.map_zero]
#align basis.linear_independent Basis.linearIndependent
protected theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (i) : b i ≠ 0 :=
b.linearIndependent.ne_zero i
#align basis.ne_zero Basis.ne_zero
protected theorem mem_span (x : M) : x ∈ span R (range b) :=
span_mono (image_subset_range _ _) (mem_span_repr_support b x)
#align basis.mem_span Basis.mem_span
@[simp]
protected theorem span_eq : span R (range b) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr fun x _ => b.mem_span x
#align basis.span_eq Basis.span_eq
theorem index_nonempty (b : Basis ι R M) [Nontrivial M] : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, y, ne⟩ : ∃ x y : M, x ≠ y := Nontrivial.exists_pair_ne
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ := not_forall.mp (mt b.ext_elem_iff.2 ne)
exact ⟨i⟩
#align basis.index_nonempty Basis.index_nonempty
/-- If the submodule `P` has a basis, `x ∈ P` iff it is a linear combination of basis vectors. -/
theorem mem_submodule_iff {P : Submodule R M} (b : Basis ι R P) {x : M} :
x ∈ P ↔ ∃ c : ι →₀ R, x = Finsupp.sum c fun i x => x • (b i : M) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [← P.range_subtype, ← Submodule.map_top, ← b.span_eq, Submodule.map_span, ← Set.range_comp,
← Finsupp.range_total]
simp [@eq_comm _ x, Function.comp, Finsupp.total_apply]
#align basis.mem_submodule_iff Basis.mem_submodule_iff
section Constr
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring S] [Module S M']
variable [SMulCommClass R S M']
/-- Construct a linear map given the value at the basis, called `Basis.constr b S f` where `b` is
a basis, `f` is the value of the linear map over the elements of the basis, and `S` is an
extra semiring (typically `S = R` or `S = ℕ`).
This definition is parameterized over an extra `Semiring S`,
such that `SMulCommClass R S M'` holds.
If `R` is commutative, you can set `S := R`; if `R` is not commutative,
you can recover an `AddEquiv` by setting `S := ℕ`.
See library note [bundled maps over different rings].
-/
def constr : (ι → M') ≃ₗ[S] M →ₗ[R] M' where
toFun f := (Finsupp.total M' M' R id).comp <| Finsupp.lmapDomain R R f ∘ₗ ↑b.repr
invFun f i := f (b i)
left_inv f := by
ext
simp
right_inv f := by
refine b.ext fun i => ?_
simp
map_add' f g := by
refine b.ext fun i => ?_
simp
map_smul' c f := by
refine b.ext fun i => ?_
simp
#align basis.constr Basis.constr
theorem constr_def (f : ι → M') :
constr (M' := M') b S f = Finsupp.total M' M' R id ∘ₗ Finsupp.lmapDomain R R f ∘ₗ ↑b.repr :=
rfl
#align basis.constr_def Basis.constr_def
theorem constr_apply (f : ι → M') (x : M) :
constr (M' := M') b S f x = (b.repr x).sum fun b a => a • f b := by
simp only [constr_def, LinearMap.comp_apply, Finsupp.lmapDomain_apply, Finsupp.total_apply]
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index] <;> simp [add_smul]
#align basis.constr_apply Basis.constr_apply
@[simp]
theorem constr_basis (f : ι → M') (i : ι) : (constr (M' := M') b S f : M → M') (b i) = f i := by
simp [Basis.constr_apply, b.repr_self]
#align basis.constr_basis Basis.constr_basis
theorem constr_eq {g : ι → M'} {f : M →ₗ[R] M'} (h : ∀ i, g i = f (b i)) :
constr (M' := M') b S g = f :=
b.ext fun i => (b.constr_basis S g i).trans (h i)
#align basis.constr_eq Basis.constr_eq
theorem constr_self (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (constr (M' := M') b S fun i => f (b i)) = f :=
b.constr_eq S fun _ => rfl
#align basis.constr_self Basis.constr_self
theorem constr_range {f : ι → M'} :
LinearMap.range (constr (M' := M') b S f) = span R (range f) := by
rw [b.constr_def S f, LinearMap.range_comp, LinearMap.range_comp, LinearEquiv.range, ←
Finsupp.supported_univ, Finsupp.lmapDomain_supported, ← Set.image_univ, ←
Finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total, Set.image_id]
#align basis.constr_range Basis.constr_range
@[simp]
theorem constr_comp (f : M' →ₗ[R] M') (v : ι → M') :
constr (M' := M') b S (f ∘ v) = f.comp (constr (M' := M') b S v) :=
b.ext fun i => by simp only [Basis.constr_basis, LinearMap.comp_apply, Function.comp]
#align basis.constr_comp Basis.constr_comp
end Constr
section Equiv
variable (b' : Basis ι' R M') (e : ι ≃ ι')
variable [AddCommMonoid M''] [Module R M'']
/-- If `b` is a basis for `M` and `b'` a basis for `M'`, and the index types are equivalent,
`b.equiv b' e` is a linear equivalence `M ≃ₗ[R] M'`, mapping `b i` to `b' (e i)`. -/
protected def equiv : M ≃ₗ[R] M' :=
b.repr.trans (b'.reindex e.symm).repr.symm
#align basis.equiv Basis.equiv
@[simp]
theorem equiv_apply : b.equiv b' e (b i) = b' (e i) := by simp [Basis.equiv]
#align basis.equiv_apply Basis.equiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem equiv_refl : b.equiv b (Equiv.refl ι) = LinearEquiv.refl R M :=
b.ext' fun i => by simp
#align basis.equiv_refl Basis.equiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem equiv_symm : (b.equiv b' e).symm = b'.equiv b e.symm :=
b'.ext' fun i => (b.equiv b' e).injective (by simp)
#align basis.equiv_symm Basis.equiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem equiv_trans {ι'' : Type*} (b'' : Basis ι'' R M'') (e : ι ≃ ι') (e' : ι' ≃ ι'') :
(b.equiv b' e).trans (b'.equiv b'' e') = b.equiv b'' (e.trans e') :=
b.ext' fun i => by simp
#align basis.equiv_trans Basis.equiv_trans
@[simp]
theorem map_equiv (b : Basis ι R M) (b' : Basis ι' R M') (e : ι ≃ ι') :
b.map (b.equiv b' e) = b'.reindex e.symm := by
ext i
simp
#align basis.map_equiv Basis.map_equiv
end Equiv
section Prod
variable (b' : Basis ι' R M')
/-- `Basis.prod` maps an `ι`-indexed basis for `M` and an `ι'`-indexed basis for `M'`
to an `ι ⊕ ι'`-index basis for `M × M'`.
For the specific case of `R × R`, see also `Basis.finTwoProd`. -/
protected def prod : Basis (Sum ι ι') R (M × M') :=
ofRepr ((b.repr.prod b'.repr).trans (Finsupp.sumFinsuppLEquivProdFinsupp R).symm)
#align basis.prod Basis.prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_repr_inl (x) (i) : (b.prod b').repr x (Sum.inl i) = b.repr x.1 i :=
rfl
#align basis.prod_repr_inl Basis.prod_repr_inl
@[simp]
theorem prod_repr_inr (x) (i) : (b.prod b').repr x (Sum.inr i) = b'.repr x.2 i :=
rfl
#align basis.prod_repr_inr Basis.prod_repr_inr
theorem prod_apply_inl_fst (i) : (b.prod b' (Sum.inl i)).1 = b i :=
b.repr.injective <| by
ext j
simp only [Basis.prod, Basis.coe_ofRepr, LinearEquiv.symm_trans_apply, LinearEquiv.prod_symm,
LinearEquiv.prod_apply, b.repr.apply_symm_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_symm, repr_self,
Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Finsupp.fst_sumFinsuppLEquivProdFinsupp]
apply Finsupp.single_apply_left Sum.inl_injective
#align basis.prod_apply_inl_fst Basis.prod_apply_inl_fst
theorem prod_apply_inr_fst (i) : (b.prod b' (Sum.inr i)).1 = 0 :=
b.repr.injective <| by
ext i
simp only [Basis.prod, Basis.coe_ofRepr, LinearEquiv.symm_trans_apply, LinearEquiv.prod_symm,
LinearEquiv.prod_apply, b.repr.apply_symm_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_symm, repr_self,
Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Finsupp.fst_sumFinsuppLEquivProdFinsupp, LinearEquiv.map_zero,
Finsupp.zero_apply]
apply Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne Sum.inr_ne_inl
#align basis.prod_apply_inr_fst Basis.prod_apply_inr_fst
theorem prod_apply_inl_snd (i) : (b.prod b' (Sum.inl i)).2 = 0 :=
b'.repr.injective <| by
ext j
simp only [Basis.prod, Basis.coe_ofRepr, LinearEquiv.symm_trans_apply, LinearEquiv.prod_symm,
LinearEquiv.prod_apply, b'.repr.apply_symm_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_symm, repr_self,
Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Finsupp.snd_sumFinsuppLEquivProdFinsupp, LinearEquiv.map_zero,
Finsupp.zero_apply]
apply Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne Sum.inl_ne_inr
#align basis.prod_apply_inl_snd Basis.prod_apply_inl_snd
theorem prod_apply_inr_snd (i) : (b.prod b' (Sum.inr i)).2 = b' i :=
b'.repr.injective <| by
ext i
simp only [Basis.prod, Basis.coe_ofRepr, LinearEquiv.symm_trans_apply, LinearEquiv.prod_symm,
LinearEquiv.prod_apply, b'.repr.apply_symm_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_symm, repr_self,
Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Finsupp.snd_sumFinsuppLEquivProdFinsupp]
apply Finsupp.single_apply_left Sum.inr_injective
#align basis.prod_apply_inr_snd Basis.prod_apply_inr_snd
@[simp]
theorem prod_apply (i) :
b.prod b' i = Sum.elim (LinearMap.inl R M M' ∘ b) (LinearMap.inr R M M' ∘ b') i := by
ext <;> cases i <;>
simp only [prod_apply_inl_fst, Sum.elim_inl, LinearMap.inl_apply, prod_apply_inr_fst,
Sum.elim_inr, LinearMap.inr_apply, prod_apply_inl_snd, prod_apply_inr_snd, Function.comp]
#align basis.prod_apply Basis.prod_apply
end Prod
section NoZeroSMulDivisors
-- Can't be an instance because the basis can't be inferred.
protected theorem noZeroSMulDivisors [NoZeroDivisors R] (b : Basis ι R M) :
NoZeroSMulDivisors R M :=
⟨fun {c x} hcx => by
exact or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun hx => by
rw [← b.total_repr x, ← LinearMap.map_smul] at hcx
have := linearIndependent_iff.mp b.linearIndependent (c • b.repr x) hcx
rw [smul_eq_zero] at this
exact this.resolve_right fun hr => hx (b.repr.map_eq_zero_iff.mp hr)⟩
#align basis.no_zero_smul_divisors Basis.noZeroSMulDivisors
protected theorem smul_eq_zero [NoZeroDivisors R] (b : Basis ι R M) {c : R} {x : M} :
c • x = 0 ↔ c = 0 ∨ x = 0 :=
@smul_eq_zero _ _ _ _ _ b.noZeroSMulDivisors _ _
#align basis.smul_eq_zero Basis.smul_eq_zero
theorem eq_bot_of_rank_eq_zero [NoZeroDivisors R] (b : Basis ι R M) (N : Submodule R M)
(rank_eq : ∀ {m : ℕ} (v : Fin m → N), LinearIndependent R ((↑) ∘ v : Fin m → M) → m = 0) :
N = ⊥ := by
rw [Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
contrapose! rank_eq with x_ne
refine ⟨1, fun _ => ⟨x, hx⟩, ?_, one_ne_zero⟩
rw [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff]
rintro g sum_eq i
cases' i with _ hi
simp only [Function.const_apply, Fin.default_eq_zero, Submodule.coe_mk, Finset.univ_unique,
Function.comp_const, Finset.sum_singleton] at sum_eq
convert (b.smul_eq_zero.mp sum_eq).resolve_right x_ne
#align eq_bot_of_rank_eq_zero Basis.eq_bot_of_rank_eq_zero
end NoZeroSMulDivisors
section Singleton
/-- `Basis.singleton ι R` is the basis sending the unique element of `ι` to `1 : R`. -/
protected def singleton (ι R : Type*) [Unique ι] [Semiring R] : Basis ι R R :=
ofRepr
{ toFun := fun x => Finsupp.single default x
invFun := fun f => f default
left_inv := fun x => by simp
right_inv := fun f => Finsupp.unique_ext (by simp)
map_add' := fun x y => by simp
map_smul' := fun c x => by simp }
#align basis.singleton Basis.singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_apply (ι R : Type*) [Unique ι] [Semiring R] (i) : Basis.singleton ι R i = 1 :=
apply_eq_iff.mpr (by simp [Basis.singleton])
#align basis.singleton_apply Basis.singleton_apply
@[simp]
theorem singleton_repr (ι R : Type*) [Unique ι] [Semiring R] (x i) :
(Basis.singleton ι R).repr x i = x := by simp [Basis.singleton, Unique.eq_default i]
#align basis.singleton_repr Basis.singleton_repr
theorem basis_singleton_iff {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (ι : Type*) [Unique ι] :
Nonempty (Basis ι R M) ↔ ∃ x ≠ 0, ∀ y : M, ∃ r : R, r • x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨b⟩
refine ⟨b default, b.linearIndependent.ne_zero _, ?_⟩
simpa [span_singleton_eq_top_iff, Set.range_unique] using b.span_eq
· rintro ⟨x, nz, w⟩
refine ⟨ofRepr <| LinearEquiv.symm
{ toFun := fun f => f default • x
invFun := fun y => Finsupp.single default (w y).choose
left_inv := fun f => Finsupp.unique_ext ?_
right_inv := fun y => ?_
map_add' := fun y z => ?_
map_smul' := fun c y => ?_ }⟩
· simp [Finsupp.add_apply, add_smul]
· simp only [Finsupp.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
rw [← smul_assoc]
· refine smul_left_injective _ nz ?_
simp only [Finsupp.single_eq_same]
exact (w (f default • x)).choose_spec
· simp only [Finsupp.single_eq_same]
exact (w y).choose_spec
#align basis.basis_singleton_iff Basis.basis_singleton_iff
end Singleton
section Empty
variable (M)
/-- If `M` is a subsingleton and `ι` is empty, this is the unique `ι`-indexed basis for `M`. -/
protected def empty [Subsingleton M] [IsEmpty ι] : Basis ι R M :=
ofRepr 0
#align basis.empty Basis.empty
instance emptyUnique [Subsingleton M] [IsEmpty ι] : Unique (Basis ι R M) where
default := Basis.empty M
uniq := fun _ => congr_arg ofRepr <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align basis.empty_unique Basis.emptyUnique
end Empty
end Basis
section Fintype
open Basis
open Fintype
/-- A module over `R` with a finite basis is linearly equivalent to functions from its basis to `R`.
-/
def Basis.equivFun [Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) : M ≃ₗ[R] ι → R :=
LinearEquiv.trans b.repr
({ Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite with
toFun := (↑)
map_add' := Finsupp.coe_add
map_smul' := Finsupp.coe_smul } :
(ι →₀ R) ≃ₗ[R] ι → R)
#align basis.equiv_fun Basis.equivFun
/-- A module over a finite ring that admits a finite basis is finite. -/
def Module.fintypeOfFintype [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M) [Fintype R] : Fintype M :=
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
Fintype.ofEquiv _ b.equivFun.toEquiv.symm
#align module.fintype_of_fintype Module.fintypeOfFintype
theorem Module.card_fintype [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M) [Fintype R] [Fintype M] :
card M = card R ^ card ι := by
classical
calc
card M = card (ι → R) := card_congr b.equivFun.toEquiv
_ = card R ^ card ι := card_fun
#align module.card_fintype Module.card_fintype
/-- Given a basis `v` indexed by `ι`, the canonical linear equivalence between `ι → R` and `M` maps
a function `x : ι → R` to the linear combination `∑_i x i • v i`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Basis.equivFun_symm_apply [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M) (x : ι → R) :
b.equivFun.symm x = ∑ i, x i • b i := by
simp [Basis.equivFun, Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum_fintype, Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite]
#align basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply Basis.equivFun_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem Basis.equivFun_apply [Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) (u : M) : b.equivFun u = b.repr u :=
rfl
#align basis.equiv_fun_apply Basis.equivFun_apply
@[simp]
theorem Basis.map_equivFun [Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
(b.map f).equivFun = f.symm.trans b.equivFun :=
rfl
#align basis.map_equiv_fun Basis.map_equivFun
theorem Basis.sum_equivFun [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M) (u : M) :
∑ i, b.equivFun u i • b i = u := by
rw [← b.equivFun_symm_apply, b.equivFun.symm_apply_apply]
#align basis.sum_equiv_fun Basis.sum_equivFun
theorem Basis.sum_repr [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M) (u : M) : ∑ i, b.repr u i • b i = u :=
b.sum_equivFun u
#align basis.sum_repr Basis.sum_repr
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Basis.lean | 934 | 935 | theorem Basis.equivFun_self [Finite ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι R M) (i j : ι) :
b.equivFun (b i) j = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by | rw [b.equivFun_apply, b.repr_self_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Thin
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.wide_pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f187f1074fa1857c94589cc653c786cadc4c35ff"
/-!
# Wide pullbacks
We define the category `WidePullbackShape`, (resp. `WidePushoutShape`) which is the category
obtained from a discrete category of type `J` by adjoining a terminal (resp. initial) element.
Limits of this shape are wide pullbacks (pushouts).
The convenience method `wideCospan` (`wideSpan`) constructs a functor from this category, hitting
the given morphisms.
We use `WidePullbackShape` to define ordinary pullbacks (pushouts) by using `J := WalkingPair`,
which allows easy proofs of some related lemmas.
Furthermore, wide pullbacks are used to show the existence of limits in the slice category.
Namely, if `C` has wide pullbacks then `C/B` has limits for any object `B` in `C`.
Typeclasses `HasWidePullbacks` and `HasFiniteWidePullbacks` assert the existence of wide
pullbacks and finite wide pullbacks.
-/
universe w w' v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable (J : Type w)
/-- A wide pullback shape for any type `J` can be written simply as `Option J`. -/
def WidePullbackShape := Option J
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape
-- Porting note: strangely this could be synthesized
instance : Inhabited (WidePullbackShape J) where
default := none
/-- A wide pushout shape for any type `J` can be written simply as `Option J`. -/
def WidePushoutShape := Option J
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape
instance : Inhabited (WidePushoutShape J) where
default := none
namespace WidePullbackShape
variable {J}
/-- The type of arrows for the shape indexing a wide pullback. -/
inductive Hom : WidePullbackShape J → WidePullbackShape J → Type w
| id : ∀ X, Hom X X
| term : ∀ j : J, Hom (some j) none
deriving DecidableEq
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.Hom
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name, generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
attribute [nolint unusedArguments] instDecidableEqHom
instance struct : CategoryStruct (WidePullbackShape J) where
Hom := Hom
id j := Hom.id j
comp f g := by
cases f
· exact g
cases g
apply Hom.term _
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.struct CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.struct
instance Hom.inhabited : Inhabited (Hom (none : WidePullbackShape J) none) :=
⟨Hom.id (none : WidePullbackShape J)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.hom.inhabited CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.Hom.inhabited
open Lean Elab Tactic
/- Pointing note: experimenting with manual scoping of aesop tactics. Attempted to define
aesop rule directing on `WidePushoutOut` and it didn't take for some reason -/
/-- An aesop tactic for bulk cases on morphisms in `WidePushoutShape` -/
def evalCasesBash : TacticM Unit := do
evalTactic
(← `(tactic| casesm* WidePullbackShape _,
(_: WidePullbackShape _) ⟶ (_ : WidePullbackShape _) ))
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] evalCasesBash
instance subsingleton_hom : Quiver.IsThin (WidePullbackShape J) := fun _ _ => by
constructor
intro a b
casesm* WidePullbackShape _, (_: WidePullbackShape _) ⟶ (_ : WidePullbackShape _)
· rfl
· rfl
· rfl
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.subsingleton_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.subsingleton_hom
instance category : SmallCategory (WidePullbackShape J) :=
thin_category
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.category CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.category
@[simp]
theorem hom_id (X : WidePullbackShape J) : Hom.id X = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.hom_id CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.hom_id
/- Porting note: we get a warning that we should change LHS to `sizeOf (𝟙 X)` but Lean cannot
find the category instance on `WidePullbackShape J` in that case. Once supplied in the proof,
the proposed proof of `simp [only WidePullbackShape.hom_id]` does not work -/
attribute [nolint simpNF] Hom.id.sizeOf_spec
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- Construct a functor out of the wide pullback shape given a J-indexed collection of arrows to a
fixed object.
-/
@[simps]
def wideCospan (B : C) (objs : J → C) (arrows : ∀ j : J, objs j ⟶ B) : WidePullbackShape J ⥤ C where
obj j := Option.casesOn j B objs
map f := by
cases' f with _ j
· apply 𝟙 _
· exact arrows j
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.wide_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.wideCospan
/-- Every diagram is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `wideCospan` -/
def diagramIsoWideCospan (F : WidePullbackShape J ⥤ C) :
F ≅ wideCospan (F.obj none) (fun j => F.obj (some j)) fun j => F.map (Hom.term j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun j => eqToIso <| by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.diagram_iso_wide_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.diagramIsoWideCospan
/-- Construct a cone over a wide cospan. -/
@[simps]
def mkCone {F : WidePullbackShape J ⥤ C} {X : C} (f : X ⟶ F.obj none) (π : ∀ j, X ⟶ F.obj (some j))
(w : ∀ j, π j ≫ F.map (Hom.term j) = f) : Cone F :=
{ pt := X
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
match j with
| none => f
| some j => π j
naturality := fun j j' f => by
cases j <;> cases j' <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [w] } }
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.mk_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.mkCone
/-- Wide pullback diagrams of equivalent index types are equivalent. -/
def equivalenceOfEquiv (J' : Type w') (h : J ≃ J') :
WidePullbackShape J ≌ WidePullbackShape J' where
functor := wideCospan none (fun j => some (h j)) fun j => Hom.term (h j)
inverse := wideCospan none (fun j => some (h.invFun j)) fun j => Hom.term (h.invFun j)
unitIso :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => by aesop_cat) fun f =>
by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
counitIso :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => by aesop_cat)
fun f => by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.equivalence_of_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.equivalenceOfEquiv
/-- Lifting universe and morphism levels preserves wide pullback diagrams. -/
def uliftEquivalence :
ULiftHom.{w'} (ULift.{w'} (WidePullbackShape J)) ≌ WidePullbackShape (ULift J) :=
(ULiftHomULiftCategory.equiv.{w', w', w, w} (WidePullbackShape J)).symm.trans
(equivalenceOfEquiv _ (Equiv.ulift.{w', w}.symm : J ≃ ULift.{w'} J))
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.ulift_equivalence CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullbackShape.uliftEquivalence
end WidePullbackShape
namespace WidePushoutShape
variable {J}
/-- The type of arrows for the shape indexing a wide pushout. -/
inductive Hom : WidePushoutShape J → WidePushoutShape J → Type w
| id : ∀ X, Hom X X
| init : ∀ j : J, Hom none (some j)
deriving DecidableEq
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.Hom
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name, generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
attribute [nolint unusedArguments] instDecidableEqHom
instance struct : CategoryStruct (WidePushoutShape J) where
Hom := Hom
id j := Hom.id j
comp f g := by
cases f
· exact g
cases g
apply Hom.init _
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.struct CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.struct
instance Hom.inhabited : Inhabited (Hom (none : WidePushoutShape J) none) :=
⟨Hom.id (none : WidePushoutShape J)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.hom.inhabited CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.Hom.inhabited
open Lean Elab Tactic
-- Pointing note: experimenting with manual scoping of aesop tactics; only this worked
/-- An aesop tactic for bulk cases on morphisms in `WidePushoutShape` -/
def evalCasesBash' : TacticM Unit := do
evalTactic
(← `(tactic| casesm* WidePushoutShape _,
(_: WidePushoutShape _) ⟶ (_ : WidePushoutShape _) ))
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] evalCasesBash'
instance subsingleton_hom : Quiver.IsThin (WidePushoutShape J) := fun _ _ => by
constructor
intro a b
casesm* WidePushoutShape _, (_: WidePushoutShape _) ⟶ (_ : WidePushoutShape _)
repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.subsingleton_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.subsingleton_hom
instance category : SmallCategory (WidePushoutShape J) :=
thin_category
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.category CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.category
@[simp]
theorem hom_id (X : WidePushoutShape J) : Hom.id X = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.hom_id CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.hom_id
/- Porting note: we get a warning that we should change LHS to `sizeOf (𝟙 X)` but Lean cannot
find the category instance on `WidePushoutShape J` in that case. Once supplied in the proof,
the proposed proof of `simp [only WidePushoutShape.hom_id]` does not work -/
attribute [nolint simpNF] Hom.id.sizeOf_spec
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- Construct a functor out of the wide pushout shape given a J-indexed collection of arrows from a
fixed object.
-/
@[simps]
def wideSpan (B : C) (objs : J → C) (arrows : ∀ j : J, B ⟶ objs j) : WidePushoutShape J ⥤ C where
obj j := Option.casesOn j B objs
map f := by
cases' f with _ j
· apply 𝟙 _
· exact arrows j
map_comp := fun f g => by
cases f
· simp only [Eq.ndrec, hom_id, eq_rec_constant, Category.id_comp]; congr
· cases g
simp only [Eq.ndrec, hom_id, eq_rec_constant, Category.comp_id]; congr
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.wide_span CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.wideSpan
/-- Every diagram is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `wideSpan` -/
def diagramIsoWideSpan (F : WidePushoutShape J ⥤ C) :
F ≅ wideSpan (F.obj none) (fun j => F.obj (some j)) fun j => F.map (Hom.init j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun j => eqToIso <| by cases j; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.diagram_iso_wide_span CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.diagramIsoWideSpan
/-- Construct a cocone over a wide span. -/
@[simps]
def mkCocone {F : WidePushoutShape J ⥤ C} {X : C} (f : F.obj none ⟶ X) (ι : ∀ j, F.obj (some j) ⟶ X)
(w : ∀ j, F.map (Hom.init j) ≫ ι j = f) : Cocone F :=
{ pt := X
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
match j with
| none => f
| some j => ι j
naturality := fun j j' f => by
cases j <;> cases j' <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [w] } }
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout_shape.mk_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushoutShape.mkCocone
/-- Wide pushout diagrams of equivalent index types are equivalent. -/
def equivalenceOfEquiv (J' : Type w') (h : J ≃ J') : WidePushoutShape J ≌ WidePushoutShape J' where
functor := wideSpan none (fun j => some (h j)) fun j => Hom.init (h j)
inverse := wideSpan none (fun j => some (h.invFun j)) fun j => Hom.init (h.invFun j)
unitIso :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => by aesop_cat) fun f => by
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
counitIso :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => by aesop_cat) fun f => by
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
/-- Lifting universe and morphism levels preserves wide pushout diagrams. -/
def uliftEquivalence :
ULiftHom.{w'} (ULift.{w'} (WidePushoutShape J)) ≌ WidePushoutShape (ULift J) :=
(ULiftHomULiftCategory.equiv.{w', w', w, w} (WidePushoutShape J)).symm.trans
(equivalenceOfEquiv _ (Equiv.ulift.{w', w}.symm : J ≃ ULift.{w'} J))
end WidePushoutShape
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- `HasWidePullbacks` represents a choice of wide pullback for every collection of morphisms -/
abbrev HasWidePullbacks : Prop :=
∀ J : Type w, HasLimitsOfShape (WidePullbackShape J) C
#align category_theory.limits.has_wide_pullbacks CategoryTheory.Limits.HasWidePullbacks
/-- `HasWidePushouts` represents a choice of wide pushout for every collection of morphisms -/
abbrev HasWidePushouts : Prop :=
∀ J : Type w, HasColimitsOfShape (WidePushoutShape J) C
#align category_theory.limits.has_wide_pushouts CategoryTheory.Limits.HasWidePushouts
variable {C J}
/-- `HasWidePullback B objs arrows` means that `wideCospan B objs arrows` has a limit. -/
abbrev HasWidePullback (B : C) (objs : J → C) (arrows : ∀ j : J, objs j ⟶ B) : Prop :=
HasLimit (WidePullbackShape.wideCospan B objs arrows)
#align category_theory.limits.has_wide_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.HasWidePullback
/-- `HasWidePushout B objs arrows` means that `wideSpan B objs arrows` has a colimit. -/
abbrev HasWidePushout (B : C) (objs : J → C) (arrows : ∀ j : J, B ⟶ objs j) : Prop :=
HasColimit (WidePushoutShape.wideSpan B objs arrows)
#align category_theory.limits.has_wide_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.HasWidePushout
/-- A choice of wide pullback. -/
noncomputable abbrev widePullback (B : C) (objs : J → C) (arrows : ∀ j : J, objs j ⟶ B)
[HasWidePullback B objs arrows] : C :=
limit (WidePullbackShape.wideCospan B objs arrows)
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.widePullback
/-- A choice of wide pushout. -/
noncomputable abbrev widePushout (B : C) (objs : J → C) (arrows : ∀ j : J, B ⟶ objs j)
[HasWidePushout B objs arrows] : C :=
colimit (WidePushoutShape.wideSpan B objs arrows)
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.widePushout
namespace WidePullback
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {B : C} {objs : J → C} (arrows : ∀ j : J, objs j ⟶ B)
variable [HasWidePullback B objs arrows]
/-- The `j`-th projection from the pullback. -/
noncomputable abbrev π (j : J) : widePullback _ _ arrows ⟶ objs j :=
limit.π (WidePullbackShape.wideCospan _ _ _) (Option.some j)
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.π CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.π
/-- The unique map to the base from the pullback. -/
noncomputable abbrev base : widePullback _ _ arrows ⟶ B :=
limit.π (WidePullbackShape.wideCospan _ _ _) Option.none
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.base CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.base
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem π_arrow (j : J) : π arrows j ≫ arrows _ = base arrows := by
apply limit.w (WidePullbackShape.wideCospan _ _ _) (WidePullbackShape.Hom.term j)
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.π_arrow CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.π_arrow
variable {arrows}
/-- Lift a collection of morphisms to a morphism to the pullback. -/
noncomputable abbrev lift {X : C} (f : X ⟶ B) (fs : ∀ j : J, X ⟶ objs j)
(w : ∀ j, fs j ≫ arrows j = f) : X ⟶ widePullback _ _ arrows :=
limit.lift (WidePullbackShape.wideCospan _ _ _) (WidePullbackShape.mkCone f fs <| w)
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.lift
variable (arrows)
variable {X : C} (f : X ⟶ B) (fs : ∀ j : J, X ⟶ objs j) (w : ∀ j, fs j ≫ arrows j = f)
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this so removed simp attribute
@[reassoc]
theorem lift_π (j : J) : lift f fs w ≫ π arrows j = fs _ := by
simp only [limit.lift_π, WidePullbackShape.mkCone_pt, WidePullbackShape.mkCone_π_app]
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.lift_π CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.lift_π
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this so removed simp attribute
@[reassoc]
theorem lift_base : lift f fs w ≫ base arrows = f := by
simp only [limit.lift_π, WidePullbackShape.mkCone_pt, WidePullbackShape.mkCone_π_app]
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.lift_base CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.lift_base
theorem eq_lift_of_comp_eq (g : X ⟶ widePullback _ _ arrows) :
(∀ j : J, g ≫ π arrows j = fs j) → g ≫ base arrows = f → g = lift f fs w := by
intro h1 h2
apply
(limit.isLimit (WidePullbackShape.wideCospan B objs arrows)).uniq
(WidePullbackShape.mkCone f fs <| w)
rintro (_ | _)
· apply h2
· apply h1
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.eq_lift_of_comp_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.eq_lift_of_comp_eq
theorem hom_eq_lift (g : X ⟶ widePullback _ _ arrows) :
g = lift (g ≫ base arrows) (fun j => g ≫ π arrows j) (by aesop_cat) := by
apply eq_lift_of_comp_eq
· aesop_cat
· rfl -- Porting note: quite a few missing refl's in aesop_cat now
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.hom_eq_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.hom_eq_lift
@[ext 1100]
theorem hom_ext (g1 g2 : X ⟶ widePullback _ _ arrows) : (∀ j : J,
g1 ≫ π arrows j = g2 ≫ π arrows j) → g1 ≫ base arrows = g2 ≫ base arrows → g1 = g2 := by
intro h1 h2
apply limit.hom_ext
rintro (_ | _)
· apply h2
· apply h1
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pullback.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePullback.hom_ext
end WidePullback
namespace WidePushout
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {B : C} {objs : J → C} (arrows : ∀ j : J, B ⟶ objs j)
variable [HasWidePushout B objs arrows]
/-- The `j`-th inclusion to the pushout. -/
noncomputable abbrev ι (j : J) : objs j ⟶ widePushout _ _ arrows :=
colimit.ι (WidePushoutShape.wideSpan _ _ _) (Option.some j)
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout.ι CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushout.ι
/-- The unique map from the head to the pushout. -/
noncomputable abbrev head : B ⟶ widePushout B objs arrows :=
colimit.ι (WidePushoutShape.wideSpan _ _ _) Option.none
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout.head CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushout.head
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem arrow_ι (j : J) : arrows j ≫ ι arrows j = head arrows := by
apply colimit.w (WidePushoutShape.wideSpan _ _ _) (WidePushoutShape.Hom.init j)
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout.arrow_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushout.arrow_ι
-- Porting note: this can simplify itself
attribute [nolint simpNF] WidePushout.arrow_ι WidePushout.arrow_ι_assoc
variable {arrows}
/-- Descend a collection of morphisms to a morphism from the pushout. -/
noncomputable abbrev desc {X : C} (f : B ⟶ X) (fs : ∀ j : J, objs j ⟶ X)
(w : ∀ j, arrows j ≫ fs j = f) : widePushout _ _ arrows ⟶ X :=
colimit.desc (WidePushoutShape.wideSpan B objs arrows) (WidePushoutShape.mkCocone f fs <| w)
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushout.desc
variable (arrows)
variable {X : C} (f : B ⟶ X) (fs : ∀ j : J, objs j ⟶ X) (w : ∀ j, arrows j ≫ fs j = f)
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this so removed simp attribute
@[reassoc]
theorem ι_desc (j : J) : ι arrows j ≫ desc f fs w = fs _ := by
simp only [colimit.ι_desc, WidePushoutShape.mkCocone_pt, WidePushoutShape.mkCocone_ι_app]
#align category_theory.limits.wide_pushout.ι_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.WidePushout.ι_desc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this so removed simp attribute
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/WidePullbacks.lean | 440 | 441 | theorem head_desc : head arrows ≫ desc f fs w = f := by |
simp only [colimit.ι_desc, WidePushoutShape.mkCocone_pt, WidePushoutShape.mkCocone_ι_app]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ioi_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ioi_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ioi a * Ici b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ioi_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ioi_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ioi b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
end ContravariantLT
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ -x`
-/
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioo Set.image_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 405 | 407 | theorem image_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) := by |
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Bases
#align_import order.filter.at_top_bot from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
/-!
# `Filter.atTop` and `Filter.atBot` filters on preorders, monoids and groups.
In this file we define the filters
* `Filter.atTop`: corresponds to `n → +∞`;
* `Filter.atBot`: corresponds to `n → -∞`.
Then we prove many lemmas like “if `f → +∞`, then `f ± c → +∞`”.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
variable {ι ι' α β γ : Type*}
open Set
namespace Filter
/-- `atTop` is the filter representing the limit `→ ∞` on an ordered set.
It is generated by the collection of up-sets `{b | a ≤ b}`.
(The preorder need not have a top element for this to be well defined,
and indeed is trivial when a top element exists.) -/
def atTop [Preorder α] : Filter α :=
⨅ a, 𝓟 (Ici a)
#align filter.at_top Filter.atTop
/-- `atBot` is the filter representing the limit `→ -∞` on an ordered set.
It is generated by the collection of down-sets `{b | b ≤ a}`.
(The preorder need not have a bottom element for this to be well defined,
and indeed is trivial when a bottom element exists.) -/
def atBot [Preorder α] : Filter α :=
⨅ a, 𝓟 (Iic a)
#align filter.at_bot Filter.atBot
theorem mem_atTop [Preorder α] (a : α) : { b : α | a ≤ b } ∈ @atTop α _ :=
mem_iInf_of_mem a <| Subset.refl _
#align filter.mem_at_top Filter.mem_atTop
theorem Ici_mem_atTop [Preorder α] (a : α) : Ici a ∈ (atTop : Filter α) :=
mem_atTop a
#align filter.Ici_mem_at_top Filter.Ici_mem_atTop
theorem Ioi_mem_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (x : α) : Ioi x ∈ (atTop : Filter α) :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := exists_gt x
mem_of_superset (mem_atTop z) fun _ h => lt_of_lt_of_le hz h
#align filter.Ioi_mem_at_top Filter.Ioi_mem_atTop
theorem mem_atBot [Preorder α] (a : α) : { b : α | b ≤ a } ∈ @atBot α _ :=
mem_iInf_of_mem a <| Subset.refl _
#align filter.mem_at_bot Filter.mem_atBot
theorem Iic_mem_atBot [Preorder α] (a : α) : Iic a ∈ (atBot : Filter α) :=
mem_atBot a
#align filter.Iic_mem_at_bot Filter.Iic_mem_atBot
theorem Iio_mem_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (x : α) : Iio x ∈ (atBot : Filter α) :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := exists_lt x
mem_of_superset (mem_atBot z) fun _ h => lt_of_le_of_lt h hz
#align filter.Iio_mem_at_bot Filter.Iio_mem_atBot
theorem disjoint_atBot_principal_Ioi [Preorder α] (x : α) : Disjoint atBot (𝓟 (Ioi x)) :=
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem (Iic_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl) (Iic_mem_atBot x) (mem_principal_self _)
#align filter.disjoint_at_bot_principal_Ioi Filter.disjoint_atBot_principal_Ioi
theorem disjoint_atTop_principal_Iio [Preorder α] (x : α) : Disjoint atTop (𝓟 (Iio x)) :=
@disjoint_atBot_principal_Ioi αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.disjoint_at_top_principal_Iio Filter.disjoint_atTop_principal_Iio
theorem disjoint_atTop_principal_Iic [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (x : α) :
Disjoint atTop (𝓟 (Iic x)) :=
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem (Iic_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl).symm (Ioi_mem_atTop x)
(mem_principal_self _)
#align filter.disjoint_at_top_principal_Iic Filter.disjoint_atTop_principal_Iic
theorem disjoint_atBot_principal_Ici [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (x : α) :
Disjoint atBot (𝓟 (Ici x)) :=
@disjoint_atTop_principal_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align filter.disjoint_at_bot_principal_Ici Filter.disjoint_atBot_principal_Ici
theorem disjoint_pure_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (x : α) : Disjoint (pure x) atTop :=
Disjoint.symm <| (disjoint_atTop_principal_Iic x).mono_right <| le_principal_iff.2 <|
mem_pure.2 right_mem_Iic
#align filter.disjoint_pure_at_top Filter.disjoint_pure_atTop
theorem disjoint_pure_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (x : α) : Disjoint (pure x) atBot :=
@disjoint_pure_atTop αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align filter.disjoint_pure_at_bot Filter.disjoint_pure_atBot
theorem not_tendsto_const_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (x : α) (l : Filter β) [l.NeBot] :
¬Tendsto (fun _ => x) l atTop :=
tendsto_const_pure.not_tendsto (disjoint_pure_atTop x)
#align filter.not_tendsto_const_at_top Filter.not_tendsto_const_atTop
theorem not_tendsto_const_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (x : α) (l : Filter β) [l.NeBot] :
¬Tendsto (fun _ => x) l atBot :=
tendsto_const_pure.not_tendsto (disjoint_pure_atBot x)
#align filter.not_tendsto_const_at_bot Filter.not_tendsto_const_atBot
theorem disjoint_atBot_atTop [PartialOrder α] [Nontrivial α] :
Disjoint (atBot : Filter α) atTop := by
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨x, y, hne⟩
by_cases hle : x ≤ y
· refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem ?_ (Iic_mem_atBot x) (Ici_mem_atTop y)
exact Iic_disjoint_Ici.2 (hle.lt_of_ne hne).not_le
· refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem ?_ (Iic_mem_atBot y) (Ici_mem_atTop x)
exact Iic_disjoint_Ici.2 hle
#align filter.disjoint_at_bot_at_top Filter.disjoint_atBot_atTop
theorem disjoint_atTop_atBot [PartialOrder α] [Nontrivial α] : Disjoint (atTop : Filter α) atBot :=
disjoint_atBot_atTop.symm
#align filter.disjoint_at_top_at_bot Filter.disjoint_atTop_atBot
theorem hasAntitoneBasis_atTop [Nonempty α] [Preorder α] [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] :
(@atTop α _).HasAntitoneBasis Ici :=
.iInf_principal fun _ _ ↦ Ici_subset_Ici.2
theorem atTop_basis [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] : (@atTop α _).HasBasis (fun _ => True) Ici :=
hasAntitoneBasis_atTop.1
#align filter.at_top_basis Filter.atTop_basis
theorem atTop_eq_generate_Ici [SemilatticeSup α] : atTop = generate (range (Ici (α := α))) := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα|hα
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· simp [(atTop_basis (α := α)).eq_generate, range]
theorem atTop_basis' [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) : (@atTop α _).HasBasis (fun x => a ≤ x) Ici :=
⟨fun _ =>
(@atTop_basis α ⟨a⟩ _).mem_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨x, _, hx⟩ => ⟨x ⊔ a, le_sup_right, fun _y hy => hx (le_trans le_sup_left hy)⟩,
fun ⟨x, _, hx⟩ => ⟨x, trivial, hx⟩⟩⟩
#align filter.at_top_basis' Filter.atTop_basis'
theorem atBot_basis [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] : (@atBot α _).HasBasis (fun _ => True) Iic :=
@atTop_basis αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.at_bot_basis Filter.atBot_basis
theorem atBot_basis' [SemilatticeInf α] (a : α) : (@atBot α _).HasBasis (fun x => x ≤ a) Iic :=
@atTop_basis' αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.at_bot_basis' Filter.atBot_basis'
@[instance]
theorem atTop_neBot [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] : NeBot (atTop : Filter α) :=
atTop_basis.neBot_iff.2 fun _ => nonempty_Ici
#align filter.at_top_ne_bot Filter.atTop_neBot
@[instance]
theorem atBot_neBot [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] : NeBot (atBot : Filter α) :=
@atTop_neBot αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.at_bot_ne_bot Filter.atBot_neBot
@[simp]
theorem mem_atTop_sets [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {s : Set α} :
s ∈ (atTop : Filter α) ↔ ∃ a : α, ∀ b ≥ a, b ∈ s :=
atTop_basis.mem_iff.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => true_and_iff _
#align filter.mem_at_top_sets Filter.mem_atTop_sets
@[simp]
theorem mem_atBot_sets [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] {s : Set α} :
s ∈ (atBot : Filter α) ↔ ∃ a : α, ∀ b ≤ a, b ∈ s :=
@mem_atTop_sets αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align filter.mem_at_bot_sets Filter.mem_atBot_sets
@[simp]
theorem eventually_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x) ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ≥ a, p b :=
mem_atTop_sets
#align filter.eventually_at_top Filter.eventually_atTop
@[simp]
theorem eventually_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in atBot, p x) ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ≤ a, p b :=
mem_atBot_sets
#align filter.eventually_at_bot Filter.eventually_atBot
theorem eventually_ge_atTop [Preorder α] (a : α) : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, a ≤ x :=
mem_atTop a
#align filter.eventually_ge_at_top Filter.eventually_ge_atTop
theorem eventually_le_atBot [Preorder α] (a : α) : ∀ᶠ x in atBot, x ≤ a :=
mem_atBot a
#align filter.eventually_le_at_bot Filter.eventually_le_atBot
theorem eventually_gt_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, a < x :=
Ioi_mem_atTop a
#align filter.eventually_gt_at_top Filter.eventually_gt_atTop
theorem eventually_ne_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, x ≠ a :=
(eventually_gt_atTop a).mono fun _ => ne_of_gt
#align filter.eventually_ne_at_top Filter.eventually_ne_atTop
protected theorem Tendsto.eventually_gt_atTop [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (c : β) : ∀ᶠ x in l, c < f x :=
hf.eventually (eventually_gt_atTop c)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_gt_at_top Filter.Tendsto.eventually_gt_atTop
protected theorem Tendsto.eventually_ge_atTop [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (c : β) : ∀ᶠ x in l, c ≤ f x :=
hf.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop c)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_ge_at_top Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ge_atTop
protected theorem Tendsto.eventually_ne_atTop [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (c : β) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ c :=
hf.eventually (eventually_ne_atTop c)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_ne_at_top Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne_atTop
protected theorem Tendsto.eventually_ne_atTop' [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {f : α → β}
{l : Filter α} (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (c : α) : ∀ᶠ x in l, x ≠ c :=
(hf.eventually_ne_atTop (f c)).mono fun _ => ne_of_apply_ne f
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_ne_at_top' Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne_atTop'
theorem eventually_lt_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : ∀ᶠ x in atBot, x < a :=
Iio_mem_atBot a
#align filter.eventually_lt_at_bot Filter.eventually_lt_atBot
theorem eventually_ne_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : ∀ᶠ x in atBot, x ≠ a :=
(eventually_lt_atBot a).mono fun _ => ne_of_lt
#align filter.eventually_ne_at_bot Filter.eventually_ne_atBot
protected theorem Tendsto.eventually_lt_atBot [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (c : β) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < c :=
hf.eventually (eventually_lt_atBot c)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_lt_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.eventually_lt_atBot
protected theorem Tendsto.eventually_le_atBot [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (c : β) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ c :=
hf.eventually (eventually_le_atBot c)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_le_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.eventually_le_atBot
protected theorem Tendsto.eventually_ne_atBot [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (c : β) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ c :=
hf.eventually (eventually_ne_atBot c)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_ne_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne_atBot
theorem eventually_forall_ge_atTop [Preorder α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ y, x ≤ y → p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ hx x le_rfl, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rcases (hasBasis_iInf_principal_finite _).eventually_iff.1 h with ⟨S, hSf, hS⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_iInter hSf (V := fun x ↦ Ici x.1) (fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl) fun x hx y hy ↦ ?_
simp only [mem_iInter] at hS hx
exact hS fun z hz ↦ le_trans (hx ⟨z, hz⟩) hy
theorem eventually_forall_le_atBot [Preorder α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in atBot, ∀ y, y ≤ x → p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in atBot, p x :=
eventually_forall_ge_atTop (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem Tendsto.eventually_forall_ge_atTop {α β : Type*} [Preorder β] {l : Filter α}
{p : β → Prop} {f : α → β} (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (h_evtl : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ y, f x ≤ y → p y := by
rw [← Filter.eventually_forall_ge_atTop] at h_evtl; exact (h_evtl.comap f).filter_mono hf.le_comap
theorem Tendsto.eventually_forall_le_atBot {α β : Type*} [Preorder β] {l : Filter α}
{p : β → Prop} {f : α → β} (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (h_evtl : ∀ᶠ x in atBot, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ y, y ≤ f x → p y := by
rw [← Filter.eventually_forall_le_atBot] at h_evtl; exact (h_evtl.comap f).filter_mono hf.le_comap
theorem atTop_basis_Ioi [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] [NoMaxOrder α] :
(@atTop α _).HasBasis (fun _ => True) Ioi :=
atTop_basis.to_hasBasis (fun a ha => ⟨a, ha, Ioi_subset_Ici_self⟩) fun a ha =>
(exists_gt a).imp fun _b hb => ⟨ha, Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hb⟩
#align filter.at_top_basis_Ioi Filter.atTop_basis_Ioi
lemma atTop_basis_Ioi' [SemilatticeSup α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : atTop.HasBasis (a < ·) Ioi :=
have : Nonempty α := ⟨a⟩
atTop_basis_Ioi.to_hasBasis (fun b _ ↦
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt (a ⊔ b)
⟨c, le_sup_left.trans_lt hc, Ioi_subset_Ioi <| le_sup_right.trans hc.le⟩) fun b _ ↦
⟨b, trivial, Subset.rfl⟩
theorem atTop_countable_basis [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] [Countable α] :
HasCountableBasis (atTop : Filter α) (fun _ => True) Ici :=
{ atTop_basis with countable := to_countable _ }
#align filter.at_top_countable_basis Filter.atTop_countable_basis
theorem atBot_countable_basis [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] [Countable α] :
HasCountableBasis (atBot : Filter α) (fun _ => True) Iic :=
{ atBot_basis with countable := to_countable _ }
#align filter.at_bot_countable_basis Filter.atBot_countable_basis
instance (priority := 200) atTop.isCountablyGenerated [Preorder α] [Countable α] :
(atTop : Filter <| α).IsCountablyGenerated :=
isCountablyGenerated_seq _
#align filter.at_top.is_countably_generated Filter.atTop.isCountablyGenerated
instance (priority := 200) atBot.isCountablyGenerated [Preorder α] [Countable α] :
(atBot : Filter <| α).IsCountablyGenerated :=
isCountablyGenerated_seq _
#align filter.at_bot.is_countably_generated Filter.atBot.isCountablyGenerated
theorem _root_.IsTop.atTop_eq [Preorder α] {a : α} (ha : IsTop a) : atTop = 𝓟 (Ici a) :=
(iInf_le _ _).antisymm <| le_iInf fun b ↦ principal_mono.2 <| Ici_subset_Ici.2 <| ha b
theorem _root_.IsBot.atBot_eq [Preorder α] {a : α} (ha : IsBot a) : atBot = 𝓟 (Iic a) :=
ha.toDual.atTop_eq
theorem OrderTop.atTop_eq (α) [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] : (atTop : Filter α) = pure ⊤ := by
rw [isTop_top.atTop_eq, Ici_top, principal_singleton]
#align filter.order_top.at_top_eq Filter.OrderTop.atTop_eq
theorem OrderBot.atBot_eq (α) [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] : (atBot : Filter α) = pure ⊥ :=
@OrderTop.atTop_eq αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.order_bot.at_bot_eq Filter.OrderBot.atBot_eq
@[nontriviality]
theorem Subsingleton.atTop_eq (α) [Subsingleton α] [Preorder α] : (atTop : Filter α) = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs x => ?_
rw [atTop, ciInf_subsingleton x, mem_principal] at hs
exact hs left_mem_Ici
#align filter.subsingleton.at_top_eq Filter.Subsingleton.atTop_eq
@[nontriviality]
theorem Subsingleton.atBot_eq (α) [Subsingleton α] [Preorder α] : (atBot : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
@Subsingleton.atTop_eq αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.subsingleton.at_bot_eq Filter.Subsingleton.atBot_eq
theorem tendsto_atTop_pure [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] (f : α → β) :
Tendsto f atTop (pure <| f ⊤) :=
(OrderTop.atTop_eq α).symm ▸ tendsto_pure_pure _ _
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_pure Filter.tendsto_atTop_pure
theorem tendsto_atBot_pure [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] (f : α → β) :
Tendsto f atBot (pure <| f ⊥) :=
@tendsto_atTop_pure αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_pure Filter.tendsto_atBot_pure
theorem Eventually.exists_forall_of_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x) : ∃ a, ∀ b ≥ a, p b :=
eventually_atTop.mp h
#align filter.eventually.exists_forall_of_at_top Filter.Eventually.exists_forall_of_atTop
theorem Eventually.exists_forall_of_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in atBot, p x) : ∃ a, ∀ b ≤ a, p b :=
eventually_atBot.mp h
#align filter.eventually.exists_forall_of_at_bot Filter.Eventually.exists_forall_of_atBot
lemma exists_eventually_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {r : α → β → Prop} :
(∃ b, ∀ᶠ a in atTop, r a b) ↔ ∀ᶠ a₀ in atTop, ∃ b, ∀ a ≥ a₀, r a b := by
simp_rw [eventually_atTop, ← exists_swap (α := α)]
exact exists_congr fun a ↦ .symm <| forall_ge_iff <| Monotone.exists fun _ _ _ hb H n hn ↦
H n (hb.trans hn)
lemma exists_eventually_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] {r : α → β → Prop} :
(∃ b, ∀ᶠ a in atBot, r a b) ↔ ∀ᶠ a₀ in atBot, ∃ b, ∀ a ≤ a₀, r a b := by
simp_rw [eventually_atBot, ← exists_swap (α := α)]
exact exists_congr fun a ↦ .symm <| forall_le_iff <| Antitone.exists fun _ _ _ hb H n hn ↦
H n (hn.trans hb)
theorem frequently_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in atTop, p x) ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ≥ a, p b :=
atTop_basis.frequently_iff.trans <| by simp
#align filter.frequently_at_top Filter.frequently_atTop
theorem frequently_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in atBot, p x) ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ≤ a, p b :=
@frequently_atTop αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align filter.frequently_at_bot Filter.frequently_atBot
theorem frequently_atTop' [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] [NoMaxOrder α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in atTop, p x) ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b > a, p b :=
atTop_basis_Ioi.frequently_iff.trans <| by simp
#align filter.frequently_at_top' Filter.frequently_atTop'
theorem frequently_atBot' [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] [NoMinOrder α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in atBot, p x) ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b < a, p b :=
@frequently_atTop' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align filter.frequently_at_bot' Filter.frequently_atBot'
theorem Frequently.forall_exists_of_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in atTop, p x) : ∀ a, ∃ b ≥ a, p b :=
frequently_atTop.mp h
#align filter.frequently.forall_exists_of_at_top Filter.Frequently.forall_exists_of_atTop
theorem Frequently.forall_exists_of_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in atBot, p x) : ∀ a, ∃ b ≤ a, p b :=
frequently_atBot.mp h
#align filter.frequently.forall_exists_of_at_bot Filter.Frequently.forall_exists_of_atBot
theorem map_atTop_eq [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {f : α → β} :
atTop.map f = ⨅ a, 𝓟 (f '' { a' | a ≤ a' }) :=
(atTop_basis.map f).eq_iInf
#align filter.map_at_top_eq Filter.map_atTop_eq
theorem map_atBot_eq [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] {f : α → β} :
atBot.map f = ⨅ a, 𝓟 (f '' { a' | a' ≤ a }) :=
@map_atTop_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align filter.map_at_bot_eq Filter.map_atBot_eq
theorem tendsto_atTop [Preorder β] {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f atTop ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ a in f, b ≤ m a := by
simp only [atTop, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ici]
#align filter.tendsto_at_top Filter.tendsto_atTop
theorem tendsto_atBot [Preorder β] {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f atBot ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ a in f, m a ≤ b :=
@tendsto_atTop α βᵒᵈ _ m f
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot Filter.tendsto_atBot
theorem tendsto_atTop_mono' [Preorder β] (l : Filter α) ⦃f₁ f₂ : α → β⦄ (h : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h₁ : Tendsto f₁ l atTop) : Tendsto f₂ l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop.2 fun b => by filter_upwards [tendsto_atTop.1 h₁ b, h] with x using le_trans
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_mono' Filter.tendsto_atTop_mono'
theorem tendsto_atBot_mono' [Preorder β] (l : Filter α) ⦃f₁ f₂ : α → β⦄ (h : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) :
Tendsto f₂ l atBot → Tendsto f₁ l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_mono' _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ h
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_mono' Filter.tendsto_atBot_mono'
theorem tendsto_atTop_mono [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ n, f n ≤ g n) :
Tendsto f l atTop → Tendsto g l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono' l <| eventually_of_forall h
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_mono Filter.tendsto_atTop_mono
theorem tendsto_atBot_mono [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ n, f n ≤ g n) :
Tendsto g l atBot → Tendsto f l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_mono _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ h
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_mono Filter.tendsto_atBot_mono
lemma atTop_eq_generate_of_forall_exists_le [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
(atTop : Filter α) = generate (Ici '' s) := by
rw [atTop_eq_generate_Ici]
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_generate_iff]
rintro - ⟨y, -, rfl⟩
exact mem_generate_of_mem ⟨y, rfl⟩
· rw [le_generate_iff]
rintro - ⟨x, -, -, rfl⟩
rcases hs x with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
have A : Ici y ∈ generate (Ici '' s) := mem_generate_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem _ ys)
have B : Ici y ⊆ Ici x := Ici_subset_Ici.2 hy
exact sets_of_superset (generate (Ici '' s)) A B
lemma atTop_eq_generate_of_not_bddAbove [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : ¬ BddAbove s) :
(atTop : Filter α) = generate (Ici '' s) := by
refine atTop_eq_generate_of_forall_exists_le fun x ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ := not_bddAbove_iff.mp hs x
exact ⟨y, hy, hy'.le⟩
end Filter
namespace OrderIso
open Filter
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem comap_atTop (e : α ≃o β) : comap e atTop = atTop := by
simp [atTop, ← e.surjective.iInf_comp]
#align order_iso.comap_at_top OrderIso.comap_atTop
@[simp]
theorem comap_atBot (e : α ≃o β) : comap e atBot = atBot :=
e.dual.comap_atTop
#align order_iso.comap_at_bot OrderIso.comap_atBot
@[simp]
theorem map_atTop (e : α ≃o β) : map (e : α → β) atTop = atTop := by
rw [← e.comap_atTop, map_comap_of_surjective e.surjective]
#align order_iso.map_at_top OrderIso.map_atTop
@[simp]
theorem map_atBot (e : α ≃o β) : map (e : α → β) atBot = atBot :=
e.dual.map_atTop
#align order_iso.map_at_bot OrderIso.map_atBot
theorem tendsto_atTop (e : α ≃o β) : Tendsto e atTop atTop :=
e.map_atTop.le
#align order_iso.tendsto_at_top OrderIso.tendsto_atTop
theorem tendsto_atBot (e : α ≃o β) : Tendsto e atBot atBot :=
e.map_atBot.le
#align order_iso.tendsto_at_bot OrderIso.tendsto_atBot
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_atTop_iff {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} (e : α ≃o β) :
Tendsto (fun x => e (f x)) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [← e.comap_atTop, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align order_iso.tendsto_at_top_iff OrderIso.tendsto_atTop_iff
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_atBot_iff {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} (e : α ≃o β) :
Tendsto (fun x => e (f x)) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atBot :=
e.dual.tendsto_atTop_iff
#align order_iso.tendsto_at_bot_iff OrderIso.tendsto_atBot_iff
end OrderIso
namespace Filter
/-!
### Sequences
-/
theorem inf_map_atTop_neBot_iff [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {F : Filter β} {u : α → β} :
NeBot (F ⊓ map u atTop) ↔ ∀ U ∈ F, ∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, u n ∈ U := by
simp_rw [inf_neBot_iff_frequently_left, frequently_map, frequently_atTop]; rfl
#align filter.inf_map_at_top_ne_bot_iff Filter.inf_map_atTop_neBot_iff
theorem inf_map_atBot_neBot_iff [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] {F : Filter β} {u : α → β} :
NeBot (F ⊓ map u atBot) ↔ ∀ U ∈ F, ∀ N, ∃ n ≤ N, u n ∈ U :=
@inf_map_atTop_neBot_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align filter.inf_map_at_bot_ne_bot_iff Filter.inf_map_atBot_neBot_iff
theorem extraction_of_frequently_atTop' {P : ℕ → Prop} (h : ∀ N, ∃ n > N, P n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, P (φ n) := by
choose u hu hu' using h
refine ⟨fun n => u^[n + 1] 0, strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n => ?_, fun n => ?_⟩
· exact Trans.trans (hu _) (Function.iterate_succ_apply' _ _ _).symm
· simpa only [Function.iterate_succ_apply'] using hu' _
#align filter.extraction_of_frequently_at_top' Filter.extraction_of_frequently_atTop'
theorem extraction_of_frequently_atTop {P : ℕ → Prop} (h : ∃ᶠ n in atTop, P n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, P (φ n) := by
rw [frequently_atTop'] at h
exact extraction_of_frequently_atTop' h
#align filter.extraction_of_frequently_at_top Filter.extraction_of_frequently_atTop
theorem extraction_of_eventually_atTop {P : ℕ → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, P n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, P (φ n) :=
extraction_of_frequently_atTop h.frequently
#align filter.extraction_of_eventually_at_top Filter.extraction_of_eventually_atTop
theorem extraction_forall_of_frequently {P : ℕ → ℕ → Prop} (h : ∀ n, ∃ᶠ k in atTop, P n k) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, P n (φ n) := by
simp only [frequently_atTop'] at h
choose u hu hu' using h
use (fun n => Nat.recOn n (u 0 0) fun n v => u (n + 1) v : ℕ → ℕ)
constructor
· apply strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ
intro n
apply hu
· intro n
cases n <;> simp [hu']
#align filter.extraction_forall_of_frequently Filter.extraction_forall_of_frequently
theorem extraction_forall_of_eventually {P : ℕ → ℕ → Prop} (h : ∀ n, ∀ᶠ k in atTop, P n k) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, P n (φ n) :=
extraction_forall_of_frequently fun n => (h n).frequently
#align filter.extraction_forall_of_eventually Filter.extraction_forall_of_eventually
theorem extraction_forall_of_eventually' {P : ℕ → ℕ → Prop} (h : ∀ n, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, P n k) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, P n (φ n) :=
extraction_forall_of_eventually (by simp [eventually_atTop, h])
#align filter.extraction_forall_of_eventually' Filter.extraction_forall_of_eventually'
theorem Eventually.atTop_of_arithmetic {p : ℕ → Prop} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hp : ∀ k < n, ∀ᶠ a in atTop, p (n * a + k)) : ∀ᶠ a in atTop, p a := by
simp only [eventually_atTop] at hp ⊢
choose! N hN using hp
refine ⟨(Finset.range n).sup (n * N ·), fun b hb => ?_⟩
rw [← Nat.div_add_mod b n]
have hlt := Nat.mod_lt b hn.bot_lt
refine hN _ hlt _ ?_
rw [ge_iff_le, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le hn.bot_lt, mul_comm]
exact (Finset.le_sup (f := (n * N ·)) (Finset.mem_range.2 hlt)).trans hb
theorem exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] {u : α → β}
(h : Tendsto u atTop atTop) (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ a' ≥ a, b ≤ u a' := by
have : Nonempty α := ⟨a⟩
have : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ u x :=
(eventually_ge_atTop a).and (h.eventually <| eventually_ge_atTop b)
exact this.exists
#align filter.exists_le_of_tendsto_at_top Filter.exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop
-- @[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem exists_le_of_tendsto_atBot [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] {u : α → β}
(h : Tendsto u atTop atBot) : ∀ a b, ∃ a' ≥ a, u a' ≤ b :=
@exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
#align filter.exists_le_of_tendsto_at_bot Filter.exists_le_of_tendsto_atBot
theorem exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : α → β}
(h : Tendsto u atTop atTop) (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ a' ≥ a, b < u a' := by
cases' exists_gt b with b' hb'
rcases exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop h a b' with ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
exact ⟨a', ha', lt_of_lt_of_le hb' ha''⟩
#align filter.exists_lt_of_tendsto_at_top Filter.exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop
-- @[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem exists_lt_of_tendsto_atBot [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β] {u : α → β}
(h : Tendsto u atTop atBot) : ∀ a b, ∃ a' ≥ a, u a' < b :=
@exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ h
#align filter.exists_lt_of_tendsto_at_bot Filter.exists_lt_of_tendsto_atBot
/-- If `u` is a sequence which is unbounded above,
then after any point, it reaches a value strictly greater than all previous values.
-/
theorem high_scores [LinearOrder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : ℕ → β} (hu : Tendsto u atTop atTop) :
∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, ∀ k < n, u k < u n := by
intro N
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, - : k ≤ N, hku : ∀ l ≤ N, u l ≤ u k⟩ : ∃ k ≤ N, ∀ l ≤ N, u l ≤ u k :=
exists_max_image _ u (finite_le_nat N) ⟨N, le_refl N⟩
have ex : ∃ n ≥ N, u k < u n := exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop hu _ _
obtain ⟨n : ℕ, hnN : n ≥ N, hnk : u k < u n, hn_min : ∀ m, m < n → N ≤ m → u m ≤ u k⟩ :
∃ n ≥ N, u k < u n ∧ ∀ m, m < n → N ≤ m → u m ≤ u k := by
rcases Nat.findX ex with ⟨n, ⟨hnN, hnk⟩, hn_min⟩
push_neg at hn_min
exact ⟨n, hnN, hnk, hn_min⟩
use n, hnN
rintro (l : ℕ) (hl : l < n)
have hlk : u l ≤ u k := by
cases' (le_total l N : l ≤ N ∨ N ≤ l) with H H
· exact hku l H
· exact hn_min l hl H
calc
u l ≤ u k := hlk
_ < u n := hnk
#align filter.high_scores Filter.high_scores
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- If `u` is a sequence which is unbounded below,
then after any point, it reaches a value strictly smaller than all previous values.
-/
-- @[nolint ge_or_gt] Porting note: restore attribute
theorem low_scores [LinearOrder β] [NoMinOrder β] {u : ℕ → β} (hu : Tendsto u atTop atBot) :
∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, ∀ k < n, u n < u k :=
@high_scores βᵒᵈ _ _ _ hu
#align filter.low_scores Filter.low_scores
/-- If `u` is a sequence which is unbounded above,
then it `Frequently` reaches a value strictly greater than all previous values.
-/
theorem frequently_high_scores [LinearOrder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : ℕ → β}
(hu : Tendsto u atTop atTop) : ∃ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ k < n, u k < u n := by
simpa [frequently_atTop] using high_scores hu
#align filter.frequently_high_scores Filter.frequently_high_scores
/-- If `u` is a sequence which is unbounded below,
then it `Frequently` reaches a value strictly smaller than all previous values.
-/
theorem frequently_low_scores [LinearOrder β] [NoMinOrder β] {u : ℕ → β}
(hu : Tendsto u atTop atBot) : ∃ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ k < n, u n < u k :=
@frequently_high_scores βᵒᵈ _ _ _ hu
#align filter.frequently_low_scores Filter.frequently_low_scores
theorem strictMono_subseq_of_tendsto_atTop {β : Type*} [LinearOrder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : ℕ → β}
(hu : Tendsto u atTop atTop) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ StrictMono (u ∘ φ) :=
let ⟨φ, h, h'⟩ := extraction_of_frequently_atTop (frequently_high_scores hu)
⟨φ, h, fun _ m hnm => h' m _ (h hnm)⟩
#align filter.strict_mono_subseq_of_tendsto_at_top Filter.strictMono_subseq_of_tendsto_atTop
theorem strictMono_subseq_of_id_le {u : ℕ → ℕ} (hu : ∀ n, n ≤ u n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ StrictMono (u ∘ φ) :=
strictMono_subseq_of_tendsto_atTop (tendsto_atTop_mono hu tendsto_id)
#align filter.strict_mono_subseq_of_id_le Filter.strictMono_subseq_of_id_le
theorem _root_.StrictMono.tendsto_atTop {φ : ℕ → ℕ} (h : StrictMono φ) : Tendsto φ atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono h.id_le tendsto_id
#align strict_mono.tendsto_at_top StrictMono.tendsto_atTop
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [OrderedAddCommMonoid β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_left' (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono' l (hf.mono fun _ => le_add_of_nonneg_left) hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_left' Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_left'
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_nonpos_left' (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ 0) (hg : Tendsto g l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_left' _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_nonpos_left' Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_nonpos_left'
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_left (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_left' (eventually_of_forall hf) hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_left Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_left
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_nonpos_left (hf : ∀ x, f x ≤ 0) (hg : Tendsto g l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_left _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_nonpos_left Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_nonpos_left
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_right' (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, 0 ≤ g x) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono' l (monotone_mem (fun _ => le_add_of_nonneg_right) hg) hf
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_right' Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_right'
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_nonpos_right' (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≤ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_right' _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_nonpos_right' Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_nonpos_right'
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_right (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (hg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ g x) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_right' hf (eventually_of_forall hg)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_right Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_right
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_nonpos_right (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_right _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_nonpos_right Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_nonpos_right
theorem tendsto_atTop_add (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_nonneg_left' (tendsto_atTop.mp hf 0) hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add Filter.tendsto_atTop_add
theorem tendsto_atBot_add (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (hg : Tendsto g l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add Filter.tendsto_atBot_add
theorem Tendsto.nsmul_atTop (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Tendsto (fun x => n • f x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop.2 fun y =>
(tendsto_atTop.1 hf y).mp <|
(tendsto_atTop.1 hf 0).mono fun x h₀ hy =>
calc
y ≤ f x := hy
_ = 1 • f x := (one_nsmul _).symm
_ ≤ n • f x := nsmul_le_nsmul_left h₀ hn
#align filter.tendsto.nsmul_at_top Filter.Tendsto.nsmul_atTop
theorem Tendsto.nsmul_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Tendsto (fun x => n • f x) l atBot :=
@Tendsto.nsmul_atTop α βᵒᵈ _ l f hf n hn
#align filter.tendsto.nsmul_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.nsmul_atBot
#noalign filter.tendsto_bit0_at_top
#noalign filter.tendsto_bit0_at_bot
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_add_const_left (C : β) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => C + f x) l atTop) :
Tendsto f l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop.2 fun b => (tendsto_atTop.1 hf (C + b)).mono fun _ => le_of_add_le_add_left
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_of_add_const_left Filter.tendsto_atTop_of_add_const_left
-- Porting note: the "order dual" trick timeouts
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_add_const_left (C : β) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => C + f x) l atBot) :
Tendsto f l atBot :=
tendsto_atBot.2 fun b => (tendsto_atBot.1 hf (C + b)).mono fun _ => le_of_add_le_add_left
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_of_add_const_left Filter.tendsto_atBot_of_add_const_left
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_add_const_right (C : β) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => f x + C) l atTop) :
Tendsto f l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop.2 fun b => (tendsto_atTop.1 hf (b + C)).mono fun _ => le_of_add_le_add_right
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_of_add_const_right Filter.tendsto_atTop_of_add_const_right
-- Porting note: the "order dual" trick timeouts
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_add_const_right (C : β) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => f x + C) l atBot) :
Tendsto f l atBot :=
tendsto_atBot.2 fun b => (tendsto_atBot.1 hf (b + C)).mono fun _ => le_of_add_le_add_right
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_of_add_const_right Filter.tendsto_atBot_of_add_const_right
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_left' (C) (hC : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ C)
(h : Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop) : Tendsto g l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_of_add_const_left C
(tendsto_atTop_mono' l (hC.mono fun x hx => add_le_add_right hx (g x)) h)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_left' Filter.tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_left'
-- Porting note: the "order dual" trick timeouts
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_left' (C) (hC : ∀ᶠ x in l, C ≤ f x)
(h : Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot) : Tendsto g l atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_of_add_const_left C
(tendsto_atBot_mono' l (hC.mono fun x hx => add_le_add_right hx (g x)) h)
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_of_add_bdd_below_left' Filter.tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_left'
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_left (C) (hC : ∀ x, f x ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop → Tendsto g l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_left' C (univ_mem' hC)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_left Filter.tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_left
-- Porting note: the "order dual" trick timeouts
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_left (C) (hC : ∀ x, C ≤ f x) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot → Tendsto g l atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_left' C (univ_mem' hC)
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_of_add_bdd_below_left Filter.tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_left
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_right' (C) (hC : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≤ C)
(h : Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop) : Tendsto f l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_of_add_const_right C
(tendsto_atTop_mono' l (hC.mono fun x hx => add_le_add_left hx (f x)) h)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_right' Filter.tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_right'
-- Porting note: the "order dual" trick timeouts
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_right' (C) (hC : ∀ᶠ x in l, C ≤ g x)
(h : Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot) : Tendsto f l atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_of_add_const_right C
(tendsto_atBot_mono' l (hC.mono fun x hx => add_le_add_left hx (f x)) h)
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_of_add_bdd_below_right' Filter.tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_right'
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_right (C) (hC : ∀ x, g x ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop → Tendsto f l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_right' C (univ_mem' hC)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_right Filter.tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_right
-- Porting note: the "order dual" trick timeouts
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_right (C) (hC : ∀ x, C ≤ g x) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot → Tendsto f l atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_right' C (univ_mem' hC)
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_of_add_bdd_below_right Filter.tendsto_atBot_of_add_bdd_below_right
end OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
section OrderedGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup β] (l : Filter α) {f g : α → β}
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_left_of_le' (C : β) (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, C ≤ f x) (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
@tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_left' _ _ _ l (fun x => -f x) (fun x => f x + g x) (-C) (by simpa)
(by simpa)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le' Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_left_of_le'
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_left_of_ge' (C : β) (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ C) (hg : Tendsto g l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_left_of_le' _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ C hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_left_of_ge' Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_left_of_ge'
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_left_of_le (C : β) (hf : ∀ x, C ≤ f x) (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_left_of_le' l C (univ_mem' hf) hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_left_of_le
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_left_of_ge (C : β) (hf : ∀ x, f x ≤ C) (hg : Tendsto g l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_left_of_le _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ C hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_left_of_ge Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_left_of_ge
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_right_of_le' (C : β) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, C ≤ g x) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
@tendsto_atTop_of_add_bdd_above_right' _ _ _ l (fun x => f x + g x) (fun x => -g x) (-C)
(by simp [hg]) (by simp [hf])
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_right_of_le' Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_right_of_le'
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_right_of_ge' (C : β) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_right_of_le' _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ C hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_right_of_ge' Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_right_of_ge'
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_right_of_le (C : β) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (hg : ∀ x, C ≤ g x) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_right_of_le' l C hf (univ_mem' hg)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_right_of_le Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_right_of_le
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_right_of_ge (C : β) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + g x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_right_of_le _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ C hf hg
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_right_of_ge Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_right_of_ge
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_const_left (C : β) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => C + f x) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_left_of_le' l C (univ_mem' fun _ => le_refl C) hf
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_const_left Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_const_left
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_const_left (C : β) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => C + f x) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_const_left _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ C hf
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_const_left Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_const_left
theorem tendsto_atTop_add_const_right (C : β) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + C) l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_right_of_le' l C hf (univ_mem' fun _ => le_refl C)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_add_const_right Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_const_right
theorem tendsto_atBot_add_const_right (C : β) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x + C) l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ C hf
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_add_const_right Filter.tendsto_atBot_add_const_right
theorem map_neg_atBot : map (Neg.neg : β → β) atBot = atTop :=
(OrderIso.neg β).map_atBot
#align filter.map_neg_at_bot Filter.map_neg_atBot
theorem map_neg_atTop : map (Neg.neg : β → β) atTop = atBot :=
(OrderIso.neg β).map_atTop
#align filter.map_neg_at_top Filter.map_neg_atTop
theorem comap_neg_atBot : comap (Neg.neg : β → β) atBot = atTop :=
(OrderIso.neg β).comap_atTop
#align filter.comap_neg_at_bot Filter.comap_neg_atBot
theorem comap_neg_atTop : comap (Neg.neg : β → β) atTop = atBot :=
(OrderIso.neg β).comap_atBot
#align filter.comap_neg_at_top Filter.comap_neg_atTop
theorem tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot : Tendsto (Neg.neg : β → β) atTop atBot :=
(OrderIso.neg β).tendsto_atTop
#align filter.tendsto_neg_at_top_at_bot Filter.tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot
theorem tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop : Tendsto (Neg.neg : β → β) atBot atTop :=
@tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot βᵒᵈ _
#align filter.tendsto_neg_at_bot_at_top Filter.tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop
variable {l}
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_neg_atTop_iff : Tendsto (fun x => -f x) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atBot :=
(OrderIso.neg β).tendsto_atBot_iff
#align filter.tendsto_neg_at_top_iff Filter.tendsto_neg_atTop_iff
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_neg_atBot_iff : Tendsto (fun x => -f x) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atTop :=
(OrderIso.neg β).tendsto_atTop_iff
#align filter.tendsto_neg_at_bot_iff Filter.tendsto_neg_atBot_iff
end OrderedGroup
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring α] {l : Filter β} {f g : β → α}
#noalign filter.tendsto_bit1_at_top
theorem Tendsto.atTop_mul_atTop (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atTop := by
refine tendsto_atTop_mono' _ ?_ hg
filter_upwards [hg.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop 0),
hf.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop 1)] with _ using le_mul_of_one_le_left
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_mul_at_top Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul_atTop
theorem tendsto_mul_self_atTop : Tendsto (fun x : α => x * x) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_id.atTop_mul_atTop tendsto_id
#align filter.tendsto_mul_self_at_top Filter.tendsto_mul_self_atTop
/-- The monomial function `x^n` tends to `+∞` at `+∞` for any positive natural `n`.
A version for positive real powers exists as `tendsto_rpow_atTop`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x : α => x ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono' _ ((eventually_ge_atTop 1).mono fun _x hx => le_self_pow hx hn) tendsto_id
#align filter.tendsto_pow_at_top Filter.tendsto_pow_atTop
end OrderedSemiring
theorem zero_pow_eventuallyEq [MonoidWithZero α] :
(fun n : ℕ => (0 : α) ^ n) =ᶠ[atTop] fun _ => 0 :=
eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, fun _n hn ↦ zero_pow $ Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 hn⟩
#align filter.zero_pow_eventually_eq Filter.zero_pow_eventuallyEq
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing α] {l : Filter β} {f g : β → α}
theorem Tendsto.atTop_mul_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (hg : Tendsto g l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atBot := by
have := hf.atTop_mul_atTop <| tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop.comp hg
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, neg_neg] using tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot.comp this
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_mul_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul_atBot
theorem Tendsto.atBot_mul_atTop (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atBot := by
have : Tendsto (fun x => -f x * g x) l atTop :=
(tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop.comp hf).atTop_mul_atTop hg
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, neg_neg] using tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot.comp this
#align filter.tendsto.at_bot_mul_at_top Filter.Tendsto.atBot_mul_atTop
theorem Tendsto.atBot_mul_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (hg : Tendsto g l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atTop := by
have : Tendsto (fun x => -f x * -g x) l atTop :=
(tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop.comp hf).atTop_mul_atTop (tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop.comp hg)
simpa only [neg_mul_neg] using this
#align filter.tendsto.at_bot_mul_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.atBot_mul_atBot
end OrderedRing
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α]
/-- $\lim_{x\to+\infty}|x|=+\infty$ -/
theorem tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop : Tendsto (abs : α → α) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono le_abs_self tendsto_id
#align filter.tendsto_abs_at_top_at_top Filter.tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop
/-- $\lim_{x\to-\infty}|x|=+\infty$ -/
theorem tendsto_abs_atBot_atTop : Tendsto (abs : α → α) atBot atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono neg_le_abs tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop
#align filter.tendsto_abs_at_bot_at_top Filter.tendsto_abs_atBot_atTop
@[simp]
theorem comap_abs_atTop : comap (abs : α → α) atTop = atBot ⊔ atTop := by
refine
le_antisymm (((atTop_basis.comap _).le_basis_iff (atBot_basis.sup atTop_basis)).2 ?_)
(sup_le tendsto_abs_atBot_atTop.le_comap tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop.le_comap)
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ -
refine ⟨max (-a) b, trivial, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [mem_preimage, mem_Ici, le_abs', max_le_iff, ← min_neg_neg, le_min_iff, neg_neg] at hx
exact hx.imp And.left And.right
#align filter.comap_abs_at_top Filter.comap_abs_atTop
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {l : Filter β} {f : β → α}
theorem Tendsto.atTop_of_const_mul {c : α} (hc : 0 < c) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => c * f x) l atTop) :
Tendsto f l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop.2 fun b => (tendsto_atTop.1 hf (c * b)).mono
fun _x hx => le_of_mul_le_mul_left hx hc
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_of_const_mul Filter.Tendsto.atTop_of_const_mul
theorem Tendsto.atTop_of_mul_const {c : α} (hc : 0 < c) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => f x * c) l atTop) :
Tendsto f l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop.2 fun b => (tendsto_atTop.1 hf (b * c)).mono
fun _x hx => le_of_mul_le_mul_right hx hc
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_of_mul_const Filter.Tendsto.atTop_of_mul_const
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_iff {n : ℕ} : Tendsto (fun x : α => x ^ n) atTop atTop ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun h hn => by simp only [hn, pow_zero, not_tendsto_const_atTop] at h, tendsto_pow_atTop⟩
#align filter.tendsto_pow_at_top_iff Filter.tendsto_pow_atTop_iff
end LinearOrderedSemiring
theorem not_tendsto_pow_atTop_atBot [LinearOrderedRing α] :
∀ {n : ℕ}, ¬Tendsto (fun x : α => x ^ n) atTop atBot
| 0 => by simp [not_tendsto_const_atBot]
| n + 1 => (tendsto_pow_atTop n.succ_ne_zero).not_tendsto disjoint_atTop_atBot
#align filter.not_tendsto_pow_at_top_at_bot Filter.not_tendsto_pow_atTop_atBot
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [LinearOrderedSemifield α] {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} {r c : α} {n : ℕ}
/-!
### Multiplication by constant: iff lemmas
-/
/-- If `r` is a positive constant, `fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to infinity along a filter
if and only if `f` tends to infinity along the same filter. -/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos (hr : 0 < r) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atTop :=
⟨fun h => h.atTop_of_const_mul hr, fun h =>
Tendsto.atTop_of_const_mul (inv_pos.2 hr) <| by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hr.ne'] ⟩
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_top_of_pos Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos
/-- If `r` is a positive constant, `fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to infinity along a filter
if and only if `f` tends to infinity along the same filter. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atTop_of_pos (hr : 0 < r) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos hr
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_top_of_pos Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atTop_of_pos
/-- If `r` is a positive constant, `x ↦ f x / r` tends to infinity along a filter
if and only if `f` tends to infinity along the same filter. -/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atTop_of_pos (hr : 0 < r) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using tendsto_mul_const_atTop_of_pos (inv_pos.2 hr)
/-- If `f` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`, then
`fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to infinity if and only if `0 < r. `-/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_pos [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atTop ↔ 0 < r := by
refine ⟨fun hrf => not_le.mp fun hr => ?_, fun hr => (tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos hr).mpr h⟩
rcases ((h.eventually_ge_atTop 0).and (hrf.eventually_gt_atTop 0)).exists with ⟨x, hx, hrx⟩
exact (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hr hx).not_lt hrx
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_top_iff_pos Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_pos
/-- If `f` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`, then
`fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to infinity if and only if `0 < r. `-/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff_pos [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atTop ↔ 0 < r := by
simp only [mul_comm _ r, tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_pos h]
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_top_iff_pos Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff_pos
/-- If `f` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`, then
`x ↦ f x * r` tends to infinity if and only if `0 < r. `-/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atTop_iff_pos [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atTop ↔ 0 < r := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff_pos h, inv_pos]
/-- If `f` tends to infinity along a filter, then `f` multiplied by a positive
constant (on the left) also tends to infinity. For a version working in `ℕ` or `ℤ`, use
`Filter.Tendsto.const_mul_atTop'` instead. -/
theorem Tendsto.const_mul_atTop (hr : 0 < r) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atTop :=
(tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.const_mul_at_top Filter.Tendsto.const_mul_atTop
/-- If a function `f` tends to infinity along a filter, then `f` multiplied by a positive
constant (on the right) also tends to infinity. For a version working in `ℕ` or `ℤ`, use
`Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul_const'` instead. -/
theorem Tendsto.atTop_mul_const (hr : 0 < r) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atTop :=
(tendsto_mul_const_atTop_of_pos hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_mul_const Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul_const
/-- If a function `f` tends to infinity along a filter, then `f` divided by a positive
constant also tends to infinity. -/
theorem Tendsto.atTop_div_const (hr : 0 < r) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / r) l atTop := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.atTop_mul_const (inv_pos.2 hr)
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_div_const Filter.Tendsto.atTop_div_const
theorem tendsto_const_mul_pow_atTop (hn : n ≠ 0) (hc : 0 < c) :
Tendsto (fun x => c * x ^ n) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.const_mul_atTop hc (tendsto_pow_atTop hn)
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_top Filter.tendsto_const_mul_pow_atTop
theorem tendsto_const_mul_pow_atTop_iff :
Tendsto (fun x => c * x ^ n) atTop atTop ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ 0 < c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => tendsto_const_mul_pow_atTop h.1 h.2⟩
· rintro rfl
simp only [pow_zero, not_tendsto_const_atTop] at h
· rcases ((h.eventually_gt_atTop 0).and (eventually_ge_atTop 0)).exists with ⟨k, hck, hk⟩
exact pos_of_mul_pos_left hck (pow_nonneg hk _)
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_top_iff Filter.tendsto_const_mul_pow_atTop_iff
lemma tendsto_zpow_atTop_atTop {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 < n) : Tendsto (fun x : α ↦ x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
lift n to ℕ+ using hn; simp
#align tendsto_zpow_at_top_at_top Filter.tendsto_zpow_atTop_atTop
end LinearOrderedSemifield
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField α] {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} {r : α}
/-- If `r` is a positive constant, `fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to negative infinity along a filter
if and only if `f` tends to negative infinity along the same filter. -/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_pos (hr : 0 < r) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simpa only [← mul_neg, ← tendsto_neg_atTop_iff] using tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos hr
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_bot_of_pos Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_pos
/-- If `r` is a positive constant, `fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to negative infinity along a filter
if and only if `f` tends to negative infinity along the same filter. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atBot_of_pos (hr : 0 < r) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_pos hr
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_bot_of_pos Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atBot_of_pos
/-- If `r` is a positive constant, `fun x ↦ f x / r` tends to negative infinity along a filter
if and only if `f` tends to negative infinity along the same filter. -/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atBot_of_pos (hr : 0 < r) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atBot_of_pos, hr]
/-- If `r` is a negative constant, `fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to infinity along a filter `l`
if and only if `f` tends to negative infinity along `l`. -/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_neg (hr : r < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simpa only [neg_mul, tendsto_neg_atBot_iff] using tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hr)
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_top_of_neg Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_neg
/-- If `r` is a negative constant, `fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to infinity along a filter `l`
if and only if `f` tends to negative infinity along `l`. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atTop_of_neg (hr : r < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_neg hr
/-- If `r` is a negative constant, `fun x ↦ f x / r` tends to infinity along a filter `l`
if and only if `f` tends to negative infinity along `l`. -/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atTop_of_neg (hr : r < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atTop_of_neg, hr]
/-- If `r` is a negative constant, `fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to negative infinity along a filter `l`
if and only if `f` tends to infinity along `l`. -/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg (hr : r < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simpa only [neg_mul, tendsto_neg_atTop_iff] using tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hr)
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_bot_of_neg Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg
/-- If `r` is a negative constant, `fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to negative infinity along a filter `l`
if and only if `f` tends to infinity along `l`. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atBot_of_neg (hr : r < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg hr
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_bot_of_neg Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atBot_of_neg
/-- If `r` is a negative constant, `fun x ↦ f x / r` tends to negative infinity along a filter `l`
if and only if `f` tends to infinity along `l`. -/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atBot_of_neg (hr : r < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atBot_of_neg, hr]
/-- The function `fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter
if and only if `r > 0` and `f` tends to infinity or `r < 0` and `f` tends to negative infinity. -/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff [NeBot l] :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atTop ↔ 0 < r ∧ Tendsto f l atTop ∨ r < 0 ∧ Tendsto f l atBot := by
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | rfl | hr)
· simp [hr, hr.not_lt, tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_neg]
· simp [not_tendsto_const_atTop]
· simp [hr, hr.not_lt, tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos]
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_top_iff Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff
/-- The function `fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter
if and only if `r > 0` and `f` tends to infinity or `r < 0` and `f` tends to negative infinity. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff [NeBot l] :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atTop ↔ 0 < r ∧ Tendsto f l atTop ∨ r < 0 ∧ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simp only [mul_comm _ r, tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff]
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_top_iff Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff
/-- The function `fun x ↦ f x / r` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter
if and only if `r > 0` and `f` tends to infinity or `r < 0` and `f` tends to negative infinity. -/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atTop_iff [NeBot l] :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atTop ↔ 0 < r ∧ Tendsto f l atTop ∨ r < 0 ∧ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff]
/-- The function `fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter
if and only if `r > 0` and `f` tends to negative infinity or `r < 0` and `f` tends to infinity. -/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff [NeBot l] :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atBot ↔ 0 < r ∧ Tendsto f l atBot ∨ r < 0 ∧ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simp only [← tendsto_neg_atTop_iff, ← mul_neg, tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff, neg_neg]
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_bot_iff Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff
/-- The function `fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter
if and only if `r > 0` and `f` tends to negative infinity or `r < 0` and `f` tends to infinity. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff [NeBot l] :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atBot ↔ 0 < r ∧ Tendsto f l atBot ∨ r < 0 ∧ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simp only [mul_comm _ r, tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff]
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_bot_iff Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff
/-- The function `fun x ↦ f x / r` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter
if and only if `r > 0` and `f` tends to negative infinity or `r < 0` and `f` tends to infinity. -/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atBot_iff [NeBot l] :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atBot ↔ 0 < r ∧ Tendsto f l atBot ∨ r < 0 ∧ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff]
/-- If `f` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`,
then `fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to infinity if and only if `r < 0. `-/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_neg [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atTop ↔ r < 0 := by
simp [tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff, h, h.not_tendsto disjoint_atBot_atTop]
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_top_iff_neg Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_neg
/-- If `f` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`,
then `fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to infinity if and only if `r < 0. `-/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff_neg [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atTop ↔ r < 0 := by
simp only [mul_comm _ r, tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_neg h]
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_top_iff_neg Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff_neg
/-- If `f` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`,
then `fun x ↦ f x / r` tends to infinity if and only if `r < 0. `-/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atTop_iff_neg [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atTop ↔ r < 0 := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atTop_iff_neg h]
/-- If `f` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`, then
`fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to negative infinity if and only if `0 < r. `-/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_pos [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atBot ↔ 0 < r := by
simp [tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff, h, h.not_tendsto disjoint_atBot_atTop]
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_bot_iff_pos Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_pos
/-- If `f` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`, then
`fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to negative infinity if and only if `0 < r. `-/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff_pos [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atBot ↔ 0 < r := by
simp only [mul_comm _ r, tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_pos h]
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_bot_iff_pos Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff_pos
/-- If `f` tends to negative infinity along a nontrivial filter `l`, then
`fun x ↦ f x / r` tends to negative infinity if and only if `0 < r. `-/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atBot_iff_pos [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atBot ↔ 0 < r := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff_pos h]
/-- If `f` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter,
`fun x ↦ r * f x` tends to negative infinity if and only if `r < 0. `-/
theorem tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_neg [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atBot ↔ r < 0 := by
simp [tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff, h, h.not_tendsto disjoint_atTop_atBot]
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_at_bot_iff_neg Filter.tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_neg
/-- If `f` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter,
`fun x ↦ f x * r` tends to negative infinity if and only if `r < 0. `-/
theorem tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff_neg [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atBot ↔ r < 0 := by
simp only [mul_comm _ r, tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_neg h]
#align filter.tendsto_mul_const_at_bot_iff_neg Filter.tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff_neg
/-- If `f` tends to infinity along a nontrivial filter,
`fun x ↦ f x / r` tends to negative infinity if and only if `r < 0. `-/
lemma tendsto_div_const_atBot_iff_neg [NeBot l] (h : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atBot ↔ r < 0 := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, tendsto_mul_const_atBot_iff_neg h]
/-- If a function `f` tends to infinity along a filter,
then `f` multiplied by a negative constant (on the left) tends to negative infinity. -/
theorem Tendsto.const_mul_atTop_of_neg (hr : r < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atBot :=
(tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.neg_const_mul_at_top Filter.Tendsto.const_mul_atTop_of_neg
/-- If a function `f` tends to infinity along a filter,
then `f` multiplied by a negative constant (on the right) tends to negative infinity. -/
theorem Tendsto.atTop_mul_const_of_neg (hr : r < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atBot :=
(tendsto_mul_const_atBot_of_neg hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_mul_neg_const Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul_const_of_neg
/-- If a function `f` tends to infinity along a filter,
then `f` divided by a negative constant tends to negative infinity. -/
lemma Tendsto.atTop_div_const_of_neg (hr : r < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / r) l atBot := (tendsto_div_const_atBot_of_neg hr).2 hf
/-- If a function `f` tends to negative infinity along a filter, then `f` multiplied by
a positive constant (on the left) also tends to negative infinity. -/
theorem Tendsto.const_mul_atBot (hr : 0 < r) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atBot :=
(tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_pos hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.const_mul_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.const_mul_atBot
/-- If a function `f` tends to negative infinity along a filter, then `f` multiplied by
a positive constant (on the right) also tends to negative infinity. -/
theorem Tendsto.atBot_mul_const (hr : 0 < r) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atBot :=
(tendsto_mul_const_atBot_of_pos hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.at_bot_mul_const Filter.Tendsto.atBot_mul_const
/-- If a function `f` tends to negative infinity along a filter, then `f` divided by
a positive constant also tends to negative infinity. -/
theorem Tendsto.atBot_div_const (hr : 0 < r) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / r) l atBot := (tendsto_div_const_atBot_of_pos hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.at_bot_div_const Filter.Tendsto.atBot_div_const
/-- If a function `f` tends to negative infinity along a filter,
then `f` multiplied by a negative constant (on the left) tends to positive infinity. -/
theorem Tendsto.const_mul_atBot_of_neg (hr : r < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => r * f x) l atTop :=
(tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_neg hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.neg_const_mul_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.const_mul_atBot_of_neg
/-- If a function tends to negative infinity along a filter,
then `f` multiplied by a negative constant (on the right) tends to positive infinity. -/
theorem Tendsto.atBot_mul_const_of_neg (hr : r < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x * r) l atTop :=
(tendsto_mul_const_atTop_of_neg hr).2 hf
#align filter.tendsto.at_bot_mul_neg_const Filter.Tendsto.atBot_mul_const_of_neg
theorem tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_atTop {c : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hc : c < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => c * x ^ n) atTop atBot :=
(tendsto_pow_atTop hn).const_mul_atTop_of_neg hc
#align filter.tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_at_top Filter.tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_atTop
theorem tendsto_const_mul_pow_atBot_iff {c : α} {n : ℕ} :
Tendsto (fun x => c * x ^ n) atTop atBot ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ c < 0 := by
simp only [← tendsto_neg_atTop_iff, ← neg_mul, tendsto_const_mul_pow_atTop_iff, neg_pos]
#align filter.tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_bot_iff Filter.tendsto_const_mul_pow_atBot_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-06")]
alias Tendsto.neg_const_mul_atTop := Tendsto.const_mul_atTop_of_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-06")]
alias Tendsto.atTop_mul_neg_const := Tendsto.atTop_mul_const_of_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-06")]
alias Tendsto.neg_const_mul_atBot := Tendsto.const_mul_atBot_of_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-06")]
alias Tendsto.atBot_mul_neg_const := Tendsto.atBot_mul_const_of_neg
end LinearOrderedField
open Filter
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto f atTop l ↔ ∀ s ∈ l, ∃ a, ∀ b ≥ a, f b ∈ s := by
simp only [tendsto_def, mem_atTop_sets, mem_preimage]
#align filter.tendsto_at_top' Filter.tendsto_atTop'
theorem tendsto_atBot' [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto f atBot l ↔ ∀ s ∈ l, ∃ a, ∀ b ≤ a, f b ∈ s :=
@tendsto_atTop' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot' Filter.tendsto_atBot'
theorem tendsto_atTop_principal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → α} {s : Set α} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ s := by
simp_rw [tendsto_iff_comap, comap_principal, le_principal_iff, mem_atTop_sets, mem_preimage]
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_principal Filter.tendsto_atTop_principal
theorem tendsto_atBot_principal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeInf β] {f : β → α} {s : Set α} :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ N, ∀ n ≤ N, f n ∈ s :=
@tendsto_atTop_principal _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_principal Filter.tendsto_atBot_principal
/-- A function `f` grows to `+∞` independent of an order-preserving embedding `e`. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_atTop [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} :
Tendsto f atTop atTop ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ i : α, ∀ a : α, i ≤ a → b ≤ f a :=
Iff.trans tendsto_iInf <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_atTop_principal
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_at_top Filter.tendsto_atTop_atTop
theorem tendsto_atTop_atBot [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} :
Tendsto f atTop atBot ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ i : α, ∀ a : α, i ≤ a → f a ≤ b :=
@tendsto_atTop_atTop α βᵒᵈ _ _ _ f
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_at_bot Filter.tendsto_atTop_atBot
theorem tendsto_atBot_atTop [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} :
Tendsto f atBot atTop ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ i : α, ∀ a : α, a ≤ i → b ≤ f a :=
@tendsto_atTop_atTop αᵒᵈ β _ _ _ f
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_at_top Filter.tendsto_atBot_atTop
theorem tendsto_atBot_atBot [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} :
Tendsto f atBot atBot ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ i : α, ∀ a : α, a ≤ i → f a ≤ b :=
@tendsto_atTop_atTop αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ f
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot Filter.tendsto_atBot_atBot
theorem tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f)
(h : ∀ b, ∃ a, b ≤ f a) : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_iInf.2 fun b =>
tendsto_principal.2 <|
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h b
mem_of_superset (mem_atTop a) fun _a' ha' => le_trans ha (hf ha')
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone Filter.tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone
theorem tendsto_atTop_atBot_of_antitone [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f)
(h : ∀ b, ∃ a, f a ≤ b) : Tendsto f atTop atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ hf h
theorem tendsto_atBot_atBot_of_monotone [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f)
(h : ∀ b, ∃ a, f a ≤ b) : Tendsto f atBot atBot :=
tendsto_iInf.2 fun b => tendsto_principal.2 <|
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h b; mem_of_superset (mem_atBot a) fun _a' ha' => le_trans (hf ha') ha
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_of_monotone Filter.tendsto_atBot_atBot_of_monotone
theorem tendsto_atBot_atTop_of_antitone [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f)
(h : ∀ b, ∃ a, b ≤ f a) : Tendsto f atBot atTop :=
@tendsto_atBot_atBot_of_monotone _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ hf h
theorem tendsto_atTop_atTop_iff_of_monotone [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Monotone f) : Tendsto f atTop atTop ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ a : α, b ≤ f a :=
tendsto_atTop_atTop.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => exists_congr fun a =>
⟨fun h => h a (le_refl a), fun h _a' ha' => le_trans h <| hf ha'⟩
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_at_top_iff_of_monotone Filter.tendsto_atTop_atTop_iff_of_monotone
theorem tendsto_atTop_atBot_iff_of_antitone [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Antitone f) : Tendsto f atTop atBot ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ a : α, f a ≤ b :=
@tendsto_atTop_atTop_iff_of_monotone _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ hf
theorem tendsto_atBot_atBot_iff_of_monotone [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Monotone f) : Tendsto f atBot atBot ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ a : α, f a ≤ b :=
tendsto_atBot_atBot.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => exists_congr fun a =>
⟨fun h => h a (le_refl a), fun h _a' ha' => le_trans (hf ha') h⟩
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_iff_of_monotone Filter.tendsto_atBot_atBot_iff_of_monotone
theorem tendsto_atBot_atTop_iff_of_antitone [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Antitone f) : Tendsto f atBot atTop ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ a : α, b ≤ f a :=
@tendsto_atBot_atBot_iff_of_monotone _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ hf
alias _root_.Monotone.tendsto_atTop_atTop := tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone
#align monotone.tendsto_at_top_at_top Monotone.tendsto_atTop_atTop
alias _root_.Monotone.tendsto_atBot_atBot := tendsto_atBot_atBot_of_monotone
#align monotone.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot Monotone.tendsto_atBot_atBot
alias _root_.Monotone.tendsto_atTop_atTop_iff := tendsto_atTop_atTop_iff_of_monotone
#align monotone.tendsto_at_top_at_top_iff Monotone.tendsto_atTop_atTop_iff
alias _root_.Monotone.tendsto_atBot_atBot_iff := tendsto_atBot_atBot_iff_of_monotone
#align monotone.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_iff Monotone.tendsto_atBot_atBot_iff
theorem comap_embedding_atTop [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] {e : β → γ}
(hm : ∀ b₁ b₂, e b₁ ≤ e b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂) (hu : ∀ c, ∃ b, c ≤ e b) : comap e atTop = atTop :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf fun b =>
le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_comap.2 ⟨Ici (e b), mem_atTop _, fun _ => (hm _ _).1⟩)
(tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone (fun _ _ => (hm _ _).2) hu).le_comap
#align filter.comap_embedding_at_top Filter.comap_embedding_atTop
theorem comap_embedding_atBot [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] {e : β → γ}
(hm : ∀ b₁ b₂, e b₁ ≤ e b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂) (hu : ∀ c, ∃ b, e b ≤ c) : comap e atBot = atBot :=
@comap_embedding_atTop βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ _ _ e (Function.swap hm) hu
#align filter.comap_embedding_at_bot Filter.comap_embedding_atBot
theorem tendsto_atTop_embedding [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] {f : α → β} {e : β → γ} {l : Filter α}
(hm : ∀ b₁ b₂, e b₁ ≤ e b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂) (hu : ∀ c, ∃ b, c ≤ e b) :
Tendsto (e ∘ f) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [← comap_embedding_atTop hm hu, tendsto_comap_iff]
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_embedding Filter.tendsto_atTop_embedding
/-- A function `f` goes to `-∞` independent of an order-preserving embedding `e`. -/
theorem tendsto_atBot_embedding [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] {f : α → β} {e : β → γ} {l : Filter α}
(hm : ∀ b₁ b₂, e b₁ ≤ e b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂) (hu : ∀ c, ∃ b, e b ≤ c) :
Tendsto (e ∘ f) l atBot ↔ Tendsto f l atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_embedding α βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ _ _ f e l (Function.swap hm) hu
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_embedding Filter.tendsto_atBot_embedding
theorem tendsto_finset_range : Tendsto Finset.range atTop atTop :=
Finset.range_mono.tendsto_atTop_atTop Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
#align filter.tendsto_finset_range Filter.tendsto_finset_range
theorem atTop_finset_eq_iInf : (atTop : Filter (Finset α)) = ⨅ x : α, 𝓟 (Ici {x}) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i => le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_atTop ({i} : Finset α)) ?_
refine
le_iInf fun s =>
le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_iInf_of_iInter s.finite_toSet (fun i => mem_principal_self _) ?_
simp only [subset_def, mem_iInter, SetCoe.forall, mem_Ici, Finset.le_iff_subset,
Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.subset_iff, forall_eq]
exact fun t => id
#align filter.at_top_finset_eq_infi Filter.atTop_finset_eq_iInf
/-- If `f` is a monotone sequence of `Finset`s and each `x` belongs to one of `f n`, then
`Tendsto f atTop atTop`. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_finset_of_monotone [Preorder β] {f : β → Finset α} (h : Monotone f)
(h' : ∀ x : α, ∃ n, x ∈ f n) : Tendsto f atTop atTop := by
simp only [atTop_finset_eq_iInf, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
intro a
rcases h' a with ⟨b, hb⟩
exact (eventually_ge_atTop b).mono fun b' hb' => (Finset.singleton_subset_iff.2 hb).trans (h hb')
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_finset_of_monotone Filter.tendsto_atTop_finset_of_monotone
alias _root_.Monotone.tendsto_atTop_finset := tendsto_atTop_finset_of_monotone
#align monotone.tendsto_at_top_finset Monotone.tendsto_atTop_finset
-- Porting note: add assumption `DecidableEq β` so that the lemma applies to any instance
theorem tendsto_finset_image_atTop_atTop [DecidableEq β] {i : β → γ} {j : γ → β}
(h : Function.LeftInverse j i) : Tendsto (Finset.image j) atTop atTop :=
(Finset.image_mono j).tendsto_atTop_finset fun a =>
⟨{i a}, by simp only [Finset.image_singleton, h a, Finset.mem_singleton]⟩
#align filter.tendsto_finset_image_at_top_at_top Filter.tendsto_finset_image_atTop_atTop
theorem tendsto_finset_preimage_atTop_atTop {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Tendsto (fun s : Finset β => s.preimage f (hf.injOn)) atTop atTop :=
(Finset.monotone_preimage hf).tendsto_atTop_finset fun x =>
⟨{f x}, Finset.mem_preimage.2 <| Finset.mem_singleton_self _⟩
#align filter.tendsto_finset_preimage_at_top_at_top Filter.tendsto_finset_preimage_atTop_atTop
-- Porting note: generalized from `SemilatticeSup` to `Preorder`
theorem prod_atTop_atTop_eq [Preorder α] [Preorder β] :
(atTop : Filter α) ×ˢ (atTop : Filter β) = (atTop : Filter (α × β)) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
simpa [atTop, prod_iInf_left, prod_iInf_right, iInf_prod] using iInf_comm
#align filter.prod_at_top_at_top_eq Filter.prod_atTop_atTop_eq
-- Porting note: generalized from `SemilatticeSup` to `Preorder`
theorem prod_atBot_atBot_eq [Preorder β₁] [Preorder β₂] :
(atBot : Filter β₁) ×ˢ (atBot : Filter β₂) = (atBot : Filter (β₁ × β₂)) :=
@prod_atTop_atTop_eq β₁ᵒᵈ β₂ᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.prod_at_bot_at_bot_eq Filter.prod_atBot_atBot_eq
-- Porting note: generalized from `SemilatticeSup` to `Preorder`
theorem prod_map_atTop_eq {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} [Preorder β₁] [Preorder β₂]
(u₁ : β₁ → α₁) (u₂ : β₂ → α₂) : map u₁ atTop ×ˢ map u₂ atTop = map (Prod.map u₁ u₂) atTop := by
rw [prod_map_map_eq, prod_atTop_atTop_eq, Prod.map_def]
#align filter.prod_map_at_top_eq Filter.prod_map_atTop_eq
-- Porting note: generalized from `SemilatticeSup` to `Preorder`
theorem prod_map_atBot_eq {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} [Preorder β₁] [Preorder β₂]
(u₁ : β₁ → α₁) (u₂ : β₂ → α₂) : map u₁ atBot ×ˢ map u₂ atBot = map (Prod.map u₁ u₂) atBot :=
@prod_map_atTop_eq _ _ β₁ᵒᵈ β₂ᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align filter.prod_map_at_bot_eq Filter.prod_map_atBot_eq
theorem Tendsto.subseq_mem {F : Filter α} {V : ℕ → Set α} (h : ∀ n, V n ∈ F) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : Tendsto u atTop F) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, u (φ n) ∈ V n :=
extraction_forall_of_eventually'
(fun n => tendsto_atTop'.mp hu _ (h n) : ∀ n, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, u k ∈ V n)
#align filter.tendsto.subseq_mem Filter.Tendsto.subseq_mem
theorem tendsto_atBot_diagonal [SemilatticeInf α] : Tendsto (fun a : α => (a, a)) atBot atBot := by
rw [← prod_atBot_atBot_eq]
exact tendsto_id.prod_mk tendsto_id
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_diagonal Filter.tendsto_atBot_diagonal
theorem tendsto_atTop_diagonal [SemilatticeSup α] : Tendsto (fun a : α => (a, a)) atTop atTop := by
rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq]
exact tendsto_id.prod_mk tendsto_id
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_diagonal Filter.tendsto_atTop_diagonal
theorem Tendsto.prod_map_prod_atBot [SemilatticeInf γ] {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β} {f : α → γ}
{g : β → γ} (hf : Tendsto f F atBot) (hg : Tendsto g G atBot) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) atBot := by
rw [← prod_atBot_atBot_eq]
exact hf.prod_map hg
#align filter.tendsto.prod_map_prod_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.prod_map_prod_atBot
theorem Tendsto.prod_map_prod_atTop [SemilatticeSup γ] {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β} {f : α → γ}
{g : β → γ} (hf : Tendsto f F atTop) (hg : Tendsto g G atTop) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) atTop := by
rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq]
exact hf.prod_map hg
#align filter.tendsto.prod_map_prod_at_top Filter.Tendsto.prod_map_prod_atTop
theorem Tendsto.prod_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf γ] {f g : α → γ}
(hf : Tendsto f atBot atBot) (hg : Tendsto g atBot atBot) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) atBot atBot := by
rw [← prod_atBot_atBot_eq]
exact hf.prod_map_prod_atBot hg
#align filter.tendsto.prod_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.prod_atBot
theorem Tendsto.prod_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup γ] {f g : α → γ}
(hf : Tendsto f atTop atTop) (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) atTop atTop := by
rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq]
exact hf.prod_map_prod_atTop hg
#align filter.tendsto.prod_at_top Filter.Tendsto.prod_atTop
theorem eventually_atBot_prod_self [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] {p : α × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in atBot, p x) ↔ ∃ a, ∀ k l, k ≤ a → l ≤ a → p (k, l) := by
simp [← prod_atBot_atBot_eq, (@atBot_basis α _ _).prod_self.eventually_iff]
#align filter.eventually_at_bot_prod_self Filter.eventually_atBot_prod_self
theorem eventually_atTop_prod_self [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {p : α × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x) ↔ ∃ a, ∀ k l, a ≤ k → a ≤ l → p (k, l) :=
eventually_atBot_prod_self (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.eventually_at_top_prod_self Filter.eventually_atTop_prod_self
theorem eventually_atBot_prod_self' [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α] {p : α × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in atBot, p x) ↔ ∃ a, ∀ k ≤ a, ∀ l ≤ a, p (k, l) := by
simp only [eventually_atBot_prod_self, forall_cond_comm]
#align filter.eventually_at_bot_prod_self' Filter.eventually_atBot_prod_self'
theorem eventually_atTop_prod_self' [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {p : α × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x) ↔ ∃ a, ∀ k ≥ a, ∀ l ≥ a, p (k, l) := by
simp only [eventually_atTop_prod_self, forall_cond_comm]
#align filter.eventually_at_top_prod_self' Filter.eventually_atTop_prod_self'
theorem eventually_atTop_curry [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] {p : α × β → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x : α × β in Filter.atTop, p x) : ∀ᶠ k in atTop, ∀ᶠ l in atTop, p (k, l) := by
rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq] at hp
exact hp.curry
#align filter.eventually_at_top_curry Filter.eventually_atTop_curry
theorem eventually_atBot_curry [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] {p : α × β → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x : α × β in Filter.atBot, p x) : ∀ᶠ k in atBot, ∀ᶠ l in atBot, p (k, l) :=
@eventually_atTop_curry αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ hp
#align filter.eventually_at_bot_curry Filter.eventually_atBot_curry
/-- A function `f` maps upwards closed sets (atTop sets) to upwards closed sets when it is a
Galois insertion. The Galois "insertion" and "connection" is weakened to only require it to be an
insertion and a connection above `b'`. -/
theorem map_atTop_eq_of_gc [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : α → β} (g : β → α) (b' : β)
(hf : Monotone f) (gc : ∀ a, ∀ b ≥ b', f a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ g b) (hgi : ∀ b ≥ b', b ≤ f (g b)) :
map f atTop = atTop := by
refine
le_antisymm
(hf.tendsto_atTop_atTop fun b => ⟨g (b ⊔ b'), le_sup_left.trans <| hgi _ le_sup_right⟩) ?_
rw [@map_atTop_eq _ _ ⟨g b'⟩]
refine le_iInf fun a => iInf_le_of_le (f a ⊔ b') <| principal_mono.2 fun b hb => ?_
rw [mem_Ici, sup_le_iff] at hb
exact ⟨g b, (gc _ _ hb.2).1 hb.1, le_antisymm ((gc _ _ hb.2).2 le_rfl) (hgi _ hb.2)⟩
#align filter.map_at_top_eq_of_gc Filter.map_atTop_eq_of_gc
theorem map_atBot_eq_of_gc [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] {f : α → β} (g : β → α) (b' : β)
(hf : Monotone f) (gc : ∀ a, ∀ b ≤ b', b ≤ f a ↔ g b ≤ a) (hgi : ∀ b ≤ b', f (g b) ≤ b) :
map f atBot = atBot :=
@map_atTop_eq_of_gc αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ hf.dual gc hgi
#align filter.map_at_bot_eq_of_gc Filter.map_atBot_eq_of_gc
theorem map_val_atTop_of_Ici_subset [SemilatticeSup α] {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : Ici a ⊆ s) :
map ((↑) : s → α) atTop = atTop := by
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨a, h le_rfl⟩⟩
have : Directed (· ≥ ·) fun x : s => 𝓟 (Ici x) := fun x y ↦ by
use ⟨x ⊔ y ⊔ a, h le_sup_right⟩
simp only [principal_mono, Ici_subset_Ici, ← Subtype.coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_mk]
exact ⟨le_sup_left.trans le_sup_left, le_sup_right.trans le_sup_left⟩
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, atTop, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_map, mem_setOf_eq,
map_iInf_eq this, map_principal]
constructor
· intro x
refine mem_of_superset (mem_iInf_of_mem ⟨x ⊔ a, h le_sup_right⟩ (mem_principal_self _)) ?_
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact le_trans le_sup_left (Subtype.coe_le_coe.2 hy)
· intro x
filter_upwards [mem_atTop (↑x ⊔ a)] with b hb
exact ⟨⟨b, h <| le_sup_right.trans hb⟩, Subtype.coe_le_coe.1 (le_sup_left.trans hb), rfl⟩
#align filter.map_coe_at_top_of_Ici_subset Filter.map_val_atTop_of_Ici_subset
/-- The image of the filter `atTop` on `Ici a` under the coercion equals `atTop`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_val_Ici_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) : map ((↑) : Ici a → α) atTop = atTop :=
map_val_atTop_of_Ici_subset (Subset.refl _)
#align filter.map_coe_Ici_at_top Filter.map_val_Ici_atTop
/-- The image of the filter `atTop` on `Ioi a` under the coercion equals `atTop`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_val_Ioi_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
map ((↑) : Ioi a → α) atTop = atTop :=
let ⟨_b, hb⟩ := exists_gt a
map_val_atTop_of_Ici_subset <| Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hb
#align filter.map_coe_Ioi_at_top Filter.map_val_Ioi_atTop
/-- The `atTop` filter for an open interval `Ioi a` comes from the `atTop` filter in the ambient
order. -/
theorem atTop_Ioi_eq [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) : atTop = comap ((↑) : Ioi a → α) atTop := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty (Ioi a) with h|⟨⟨b, hb⟩⟩
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· rw [← map_val_atTop_of_Ici_subset (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hb), comap_map Subtype.coe_injective]
#align filter.at_top_Ioi_eq Filter.atTop_Ioi_eq
/-- The `atTop` filter for an open interval `Ici a` comes from the `atTop` filter in the ambient
order. -/
theorem atTop_Ici_eq [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) : atTop = comap ((↑) : Ici a → α) atTop := by
rw [← map_val_Ici_atTop a, comap_map Subtype.coe_injective]
#align filter.at_top_Ici_eq Filter.atTop_Ici_eq
/-- The `atBot` filter for an open interval `Iio a` comes from the `atBot` filter in the ambient
order. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_val_Iio_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) :
map ((↑) : Iio a → α) atBot = atBot :=
@map_val_Ioi_atTop αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align filter.map_coe_Iio_at_bot Filter.map_val_Iio_atBot
/-- The `atBot` filter for an open interval `Iio a` comes from the `atBot` filter in the ambient
order. -/
theorem atBot_Iio_eq [SemilatticeInf α] (a : α) : atBot = comap ((↑) : Iio a → α) atBot :=
@atTop_Ioi_eq αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.at_bot_Iio_eq Filter.atBot_Iio_eq
/-- The `atBot` filter for an open interval `Iic a` comes from the `atBot` filter in the ambient
order. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_val_Iic_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] (a : α) : map ((↑) : Iic a → α) atBot = atBot :=
@map_val_Ici_atTop αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.map_coe_Iic_at_bot Filter.map_val_Iic_atBot
/-- The `atBot` filter for an open interval `Iic a` comes from the `atBot` filter in the ambient
order. -/
theorem atBot_Iic_eq [SemilatticeInf α] (a : α) : atBot = comap ((↑) : Iic a → α) atBot :=
@atTop_Ici_eq αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.at_bot_Iic_eq Filter.atBot_Iic_eq
theorem tendsto_Ioi_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] {a : α} {f : β → Ioi a} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l atTop := by
rw [atTop_Ioi_eq, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.tendsto_Ioi_at_top Filter.tendsto_Ioi_atTop
theorem tendsto_Iio_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] {a : α} {f : β → Iio a} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l atBot ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l atBot := by
rw [atBot_Iio_eq, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.tendsto_Iio_at_bot Filter.tendsto_Iio_atBot
theorem tendsto_Ici_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] {a : α} {f : β → Ici a} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l atTop := by
rw [atTop_Ici_eq, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.tendsto_Ici_at_top Filter.tendsto_Ici_atTop
theorem tendsto_Iic_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] {a : α} {f : β → Iic a} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l atBot ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l atBot := by
rw [atBot_Iic_eq, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.tendsto_Iic_at_bot Filter.tendsto_Iic_atBot
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS doesn't simplify. It does.
theorem tendsto_comp_val_Ioi_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} {f : α → β}
{l : Filter β} : Tendsto (fun x : Ioi a => f x) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f atTop l := by
rw [← map_val_Ioi_atTop a, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.tendsto_comp_coe_Ioi_at_top Filter.tendsto_comp_val_Ioi_atTop
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS doesn't simplify. It does.
theorem tendsto_comp_val_Ici_atTop [SemilatticeSup α] {a : α} {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto (fun x : Ici a => f x) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f atTop l := by
rw [← map_val_Ici_atTop a, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.tendsto_comp_coe_Ici_at_top Filter.tendsto_comp_val_Ici_atTop
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS doesn't simplify. It does.
theorem tendsto_comp_val_Iio_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} {f : α → β}
{l : Filter β} : Tendsto (fun x : Iio a => f x) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f atBot l := by
rw [← map_val_Iio_atBot a, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.tendsto_comp_coe_Iio_at_bot Filter.tendsto_comp_val_Iio_atBot
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS doesn't simplify. It does.
theorem tendsto_comp_val_Iic_atBot [SemilatticeInf α] {a : α} {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto (fun x : Iic a => f x) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f atBot l := by
rw [← map_val_Iic_atBot a, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.tendsto_comp_coe_Iic_at_bot Filter.tendsto_comp_val_Iic_atBot
theorem map_add_atTop_eq_nat (k : ℕ) : map (fun a => a + k) atTop = atTop :=
map_atTop_eq_of_gc (fun a => a - k) k (fun a b h => add_le_add_right h k)
(fun a b h => (le_tsub_iff_right h).symm) fun a h => by rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
#align filter.map_add_at_top_eq_nat Filter.map_add_atTop_eq_nat
theorem map_sub_atTop_eq_nat (k : ℕ) : map (fun a => a - k) atTop = atTop :=
map_atTop_eq_of_gc (fun a => a + k) 0 (fun a b h => tsub_le_tsub_right h _)
(fun a b _ => tsub_le_iff_right) fun b _ => by rw [add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align filter.map_sub_at_top_eq_nat Filter.map_sub_atTop_eq_nat
theorem tendsto_add_atTop_nat (k : ℕ) : Tendsto (fun a => a + k) atTop atTop :=
le_of_eq (map_add_atTop_eq_nat k)
#align filter.tendsto_add_at_top_nat Filter.tendsto_add_atTop_nat
theorem tendsto_sub_atTop_nat (k : ℕ) : Tendsto (fun a => a - k) atTop atTop :=
le_of_eq (map_sub_atTop_eq_nat k)
#align filter.tendsto_sub_at_top_nat Filter.tendsto_sub_atTop_nat
theorem tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat {f : ℕ → α} {l : Filter α} (k : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun n => f (n + k)) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f atTop l :=
show Tendsto (f ∘ fun n => n + k) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f atTop l by
rw [← tendsto_map'_iff, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
#align filter.tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat Filter.tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat
theorem map_div_atTop_eq_nat (k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k) : map (fun a => a / k) atTop = atTop :=
map_atTop_eq_of_gc (fun b => b * k + (k - 1)) 1 (fun a b h => Nat.div_le_div_right h)
-- Porting note: there was a parse error in `calc`, use `simp` instead
(fun a b _ => by simp only [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul hk, Nat.succ_eq_add_one,
add_assoc, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hk.ne'), add_mul, one_mul])
fun b _ =>
calc
b = b * k / k := by rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel b hk]
_ ≤ (b * k + (k - 1)) / k := Nat.div_le_div_right <| Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align filter.map_div_at_top_eq_nat Filter.map_div_atTop_eq_nat
/-- If `u` is a monotone function with linear ordered codomain and the range of `u` is not bounded
above, then `Tendsto u atTop atTop`. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone' [Preorder ι] [LinearOrder α] {u : ι → α} (h : Monotone u)
(H : ¬BddAbove (range u)) : Tendsto u atTop atTop := by
apply h.tendsto_atTop_atTop
intro b
rcases not_bddAbove_iff.1 H b with ⟨_, ⟨N, rfl⟩, hN⟩
exact ⟨N, le_of_lt hN⟩
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone' Filter.tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone'
/-- If `u` is a monotone function with linear ordered codomain and the range of `u` is not bounded
below, then `Tendsto u atBot atBot`. -/
theorem tendsto_atBot_atBot_of_monotone' [Preorder ι] [LinearOrder α] {u : ι → α} (h : Monotone u)
(H : ¬BddBelow (range u)) : Tendsto u atBot atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone' ιᵒᵈ αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h.dual H
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_of_monotone' Filter.tendsto_atBot_atBot_of_monotone'
theorem unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β]
{f : α → β} (h : Tendsto f atTop atTop) : ¬BddAbove (range f) := by
rintro ⟨M, hM⟩
cases' mem_atTop_sets.mp (h <| Ioi_mem_atTop M) with a ha
apply lt_irrefl M
calc
M < f a := ha a le_rfl
_ ≤ M := hM (Set.mem_range_self a)
#align filter.unbounded_of_tendsto_at_top Filter.unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop
theorem unbounded_of_tendsto_atBot [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β]
{f : α → β} (h : Tendsto f atTop atBot) : ¬BddBelow (range f) :=
@unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align filter.unbounded_of_tendsto_at_bot Filter.unbounded_of_tendsto_atBot
theorem unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β]
{f : α → β} (h : Tendsto f atBot atTop) : ¬BddAbove (range f) :=
@unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align filter.unbounded_of_tendsto_at_top' Filter.unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop'
theorem unbounded_of_tendsto_atBot' [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeInf α] [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β]
{f : α → β} (h : Tendsto f atBot atBot) : ¬BddBelow (range f) :=
@unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align filter.unbounded_of_tendsto_at_bot' Filter.unbounded_of_tendsto_atBot'
/-- If a monotone function `u : ι → α` tends to `atTop` along *some* non-trivial filter `l`, then
it tends to `atTop` along `atTop`. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_monotone_of_filter [Preorder ι] [Preorder α] {l : Filter ι} {u : ι → α}
(h : Monotone u) [NeBot l] (hu : Tendsto u l atTop) : Tendsto u atTop atTop :=
h.tendsto_atTop_atTop fun b => (hu.eventually (mem_atTop b)).exists
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_of_monotone_of_filter Filter.tendsto_atTop_of_monotone_of_filter
/-- If a monotone function `u : ι → α` tends to `atBot` along *some* non-trivial filter `l`, then
it tends to `atBot` along `atBot`. -/
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_monotone_of_filter [Preorder ι] [Preorder α] {l : Filter ι} {u : ι → α}
(h : Monotone u) [NeBot l] (hu : Tendsto u l atBot) : Tendsto u atBot atBot :=
@tendsto_atTop_of_monotone_of_filter ιᵒᵈ αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ h.dual _ hu
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_of_monotone_of_filter Filter.tendsto_atBot_of_monotone_of_filter
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_monotone_of_subseq [Preorder ι] [Preorder α] {u : ι → α} {φ : ι' → ι}
(h : Monotone u) {l : Filter ι'} [NeBot l] (H : Tendsto (u ∘ φ) l atTop) :
Tendsto u atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_of_monotone_of_filter h (tendsto_map' H)
#align filter.tendsto_at_top_of_monotone_of_subseq Filter.tendsto_atTop_of_monotone_of_subseq
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_monotone_of_subseq [Preorder ι] [Preorder α] {u : ι → α} {φ : ι' → ι}
(h : Monotone u) {l : Filter ι'} [NeBot l] (H : Tendsto (u ∘ φ) l atBot) :
Tendsto u atBot atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_of_monotone_of_filter h (tendsto_map' H)
#align filter.tendsto_at_bot_of_monotone_of_subseq Filter.tendsto_atBot_of_monotone_of_subseq
/-- Let `f` and `g` be two maps to the same commutative monoid. This lemma gives a sufficient
condition for comparison of the filter `atTop.map (fun s ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b)` with
`atTop.map (fun s ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, g b)`. This is useful to compare the set of limit points of
`Π b in s, f b` as `s → atTop` with the similar set for `g`. -/
@[to_additive "Let `f` and `g` be two maps to the same commutative additive monoid. This lemma gives
a sufficient condition for comparison of the filter `atTop.map (fun s ↦ ∑ b ∈ s, f b)` with
`atTop.map (fun s ↦ ∑ b ∈ s, g b)`. This is useful to compare the set of limit points of
`∑ b ∈ s, f b` as `s → atTop` with the similar set for `g`."]
theorem map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq [CommMonoid α] {f : β → α} {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ,
∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' → ∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b) :
(atTop.map fun s : Finset β => ∏ b ∈ s, f b) ≤
atTop.map fun s : Finset γ => ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
classical
refine ((atTop_basis.map _).le_basis_iff (atTop_basis.map _)).2 fun b _ => ?_
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := h_eq b
refine ⟨v, trivial, ?_⟩
simpa [image_subset_iff] using hv
#align filter.map_at_top_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq Filter.map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq
#align filter.map_at_top_finset_sum_le_of_sum_eq Filter.map_atTop_finset_sum_le_of_sum_eq
theorem HasAntitoneBasis.eventually_subset [Preorder ι] {l : Filter α} {s : ι → Set α}
(hl : l.HasAntitoneBasis s) {t : Set α} (ht : t ∈ l) : ∀ᶠ i in atTop, s i ⊆ t :=
let ⟨i, _, hi⟩ := hl.1.mem_iff.1 ht
(eventually_ge_atTop i).mono fun _j hj => (hl.antitone hj).trans hi
#align filter.has_antitone_basis.eventually_subset Filter.HasAntitoneBasis.eventually_subset
protected theorem HasAntitoneBasis.tendsto [Preorder ι] {l : Filter α} {s : ι → Set α}
(hl : l.HasAntitoneBasis s) {φ : ι → α} (h : ∀ i : ι, φ i ∈ s i) : Tendsto φ atTop l :=
fun _t ht => mem_map.2 <| (hl.eventually_subset ht).mono fun i hi => hi (h i)
#align filter.has_antitone_basis.tendsto Filter.HasAntitoneBasis.tendsto
theorem HasAntitoneBasis.comp_mono [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι] [Preorder ι'] {l : Filter α}
{s : ι' → Set α} (hs : l.HasAntitoneBasis s) {φ : ι → ι'} (φ_mono : Monotone φ)
(hφ : Tendsto φ atTop atTop) : l.HasAntitoneBasis (s ∘ φ) :=
⟨hs.1.to_hasBasis
(fun n _ => (hφ.eventually_ge_atTop n).exists.imp fun _m hm => ⟨trivial, hs.antitone hm⟩)
fun n _ => ⟨φ n, trivial, Subset.rfl⟩,
hs.antitone.comp_monotone φ_mono⟩
#align filter.has_antitone_basis.comp_mono Filter.HasAntitoneBasis.comp_mono
theorem HasAntitoneBasis.comp_strictMono {l : Filter α} {s : ℕ → Set α} (hs : l.HasAntitoneBasis s)
{φ : ℕ → ℕ} (hφ : StrictMono φ) : l.HasAntitoneBasis (s ∘ φ) :=
hs.comp_mono hφ.monotone hφ.tendsto_atTop
#align filter.has_antitone_basis.comp_strict_mono Filter.HasAntitoneBasis.comp_strictMono
/-- Given an antitone basis `s : ℕ → Set α` of a filter, extract an antitone subbasis `s ∘ φ`,
`φ : ℕ → ℕ`, such that `m < n` implies `r (φ m) (φ n)`. This lemma can be used to extract an
antitone basis with basis sets decreasing "sufficiently fast". -/
theorem HasAntitoneBasis.subbasis_with_rel {f : Filter α} {s : ℕ → Set α}
(hs : f.HasAntitoneBasis s) {r : ℕ → ℕ → Prop} (hr : ∀ m, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, r m n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ (∀ ⦃m n⦄, m < n → r (φ m) (φ n)) ∧ f.HasAntitoneBasis (s ∘ φ) := by
rsuffices ⟨φ, hφ, hrφ⟩ : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ m n, m < n → r (φ m) (φ n)
· exact ⟨φ, hφ, hrφ, hs.comp_strictMono hφ⟩
have : ∀ t : Set ℕ, t.Finite → ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ m ∈ t, m < n ∧ r m n := fun t ht =>
(eventually_all_finite ht).2 fun m _ => (eventually_gt_atTop m).and (hr _)
rcases seq_of_forall_finite_exists fun t ht => (this t ht).exists with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
simp only [forall_mem_image, forall_and, mem_Iio] at hφ
exact ⟨φ, forall_swap.2 hφ.1, forall_swap.2 hφ.2⟩
#align filter.has_antitone_basis.subbasis_with_rel Filter.HasAntitoneBasis.subbasis_with_rel
/-- If `f` is a nontrivial countably generated filter, then there exists a sequence that converges
to `f`. -/
theorem exists_seq_tendsto (f : Filter α) [IsCountablyGenerated f] [NeBot f] :
∃ x : ℕ → α, Tendsto x atTop f := by
obtain ⟨B, h⟩ := f.exists_antitone_basis
choose x hx using fun n => Filter.nonempty_of_mem (h.mem n)
exact ⟨x, h.tendsto hx⟩
#align filter.exists_seq_tendsto Filter.exists_seq_tendsto
theorem exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop (α : Type*) [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α]
[(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] :
∃ xs : ℕ → α, Monotone xs ∧ Tendsto xs atTop atTop := by
obtain ⟨ys, h⟩ := exists_seq_tendsto (atTop : Filter α)
let xs : ℕ → α := fun n => Finset.sup' (Finset.range (n + 1)) Finset.nonempty_range_succ ys
have h_mono : Monotone xs := fun i j hij ↦ by
simp only [xs] -- Need to unfold `xs` and do alpha reduction, otherwise `gcongr` fails
gcongr
refine ⟨xs, h_mono, tendsto_atTop_mono (fun n ↦ Finset.le_sup' _ ?_) h⟩
simp
#align exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_at_top_at_top Filter.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop
theorem exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot (α : Type*) [SemilatticeInf α] [Nonempty α]
[h2 : (atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] :
∃ xs : ℕ → α, Antitone xs ∧ Tendsto xs atTop atBot :=
@exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop αᵒᵈ _ _ h2
#align exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_at_top_at_bot Filter.exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot
/-- An abstract version of continuity of sequentially continuous functions on metric spaces:
if a filter `k` is countably generated then `Tendsto f k l` iff for every sequence `u`
converging to `k`, `f ∘ u` tends to `l`. -/
theorem tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto {f : α → β} {k : Filter α} {l : Filter β} [k.IsCountablyGenerated] :
Tendsto f k l ↔ ∀ x : ℕ → α, Tendsto x atTop k → Tendsto (f ∘ x) atTop l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.comp hx, fun H s hs => ?_⟩
contrapose! H
have : NeBot (k ⊓ 𝓟 (f ⁻¹' sᶜ)) := by simpa [neBot_iff, inf_principal_eq_bot]
rcases (k ⊓ 𝓟 (f ⁻¹' sᶜ)).exists_seq_tendsto with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [tendsto_inf, tendsto_principal] at hx
refine ⟨x, hx.1, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases (hx.2.and (h hs)).exists with ⟨N, hnmem, hmem⟩
exact hnmem hmem
#align filter.tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto Filter.tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto
theorem tendsto_of_seq_tendsto {f : α → β} {k : Filter α} {l : Filter β} [k.IsCountablyGenerated] :
(∀ x : ℕ → α, Tendsto x atTop k → Tendsto (f ∘ x) atTop l) → Tendsto f k l :=
tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto.2
#align filter.tendsto_of_seq_tendsto Filter.tendsto_of_seq_tendsto
theorem eventually_iff_seq_eventually {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {p : ι → Prop}
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
(∀ᶠ n in l, p n) ↔ ∀ x : ℕ → ι, Tendsto x atTop l → ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, p (x n) := by
simpa using tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto (f := id) (l := 𝓟 {x | p x})
#align filter.eventually_iff_seq_eventually Filter.eventually_iff_seq_eventually
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/AtTopBot.lean | 1,995 | 1,999 | theorem frequently_iff_seq_frequently {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {p : ι → Prop}
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
(∃ᶠ n in l, p n) ↔ ∃ x : ℕ → ι, Tendsto x atTop l ∧ ∃ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, p (x n) := by |
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iff_seq_eventually (l := l)]
push_neg; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Bitraversable.Basic
#align_import control.bitraversable.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"58581d0fe523063f5651df0619be2bf65012a94a"
/-!
# Bitraversable Lemmas
## Main definitions
* tfst - traverse on first functor argument
* tsnd - traverse on second functor argument
## Lemmas
Combination of
* bitraverse
* tfst
* tsnd
with the applicatives `id` and `comp`
## References
* Hackage: <https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.12.0.0/docs/Data-Bitraversable.html>
## Tags
traversable bitraversable functor bifunctor applicative
-/
universe u
variable {t : Type u → Type u → Type u} [Bitraversable t]
variable {β : Type u}
namespace Bitraversable
open Functor LawfulApplicative
variable {F G : Type u → Type u} [Applicative F] [Applicative G]
/-- traverse on the first functor argument -/
abbrev tfst {α α'} (f : α → F α') : t α β → F (t α' β) :=
bitraverse f pure
#align bitraversable.tfst Bitraversable.tfst
/-- traverse on the second functor argument -/
abbrev tsnd {α α'} (f : α → F α') : t β α → F (t β α') :=
bitraverse pure f
#align bitraversable.tsnd Bitraversable.tsnd
variable [LawfulBitraversable t] [LawfulApplicative F] [LawfulApplicative G]
@[higher_order tfst_id]
theorem id_tfst : ∀ {α β} (x : t α β), tfst (F := Id) pure x = pure x :=
id_bitraverse
#align bitraversable.id_tfst Bitraversable.id_tfst
@[higher_order tsnd_id]
theorem id_tsnd : ∀ {α β} (x : t α β), tsnd (F := Id) pure x = pure x :=
id_bitraverse
#align bitraversable.id_tsnd Bitraversable.id_tsnd
@[higher_order tfst_comp_tfst]
theorem comp_tfst {α₀ α₁ α₂ β} (f : α₀ → F α₁) (f' : α₁ → G α₂) (x : t α₀ β) :
Comp.mk (tfst f' <$> tfst f x) = tfst (Comp.mk ∘ map f' ∘ f) x := by
rw [← comp_bitraverse]
simp only [Function.comp, tfst, map_pure, Pure.pure]
#align bitraversable.comp_tfst Bitraversable.comp_tfst
@[higher_order tfst_comp_tsnd]
theorem tfst_tsnd {α₀ α₁ β₀ β₁} (f : α₀ → F α₁) (f' : β₀ → G β₁) (x : t α₀ β₀) :
Comp.mk (tfst f <$> tsnd f' x)
= bitraverse (Comp.mk ∘ pure ∘ f) (Comp.mk ∘ map pure ∘ f') x := by
rw [← comp_bitraverse]
simp only [Function.comp, map_pure]
#align bitraversable.tfst_tsnd Bitraversable.tfst_tsnd
@[higher_order tsnd_comp_tfst]
theorem tsnd_tfst {α₀ α₁ β₀ β₁} (f : α₀ → F α₁) (f' : β₀ → G β₁) (x : t α₀ β₀) :
Comp.mk (tsnd f' <$> tfst f x)
= bitraverse (Comp.mk ∘ map pure ∘ f) (Comp.mk ∘ pure ∘ f') x := by
rw [← comp_bitraverse]
simp only [Function.comp, map_pure]
#align bitraversable.tsnd_tfst Bitraversable.tsnd_tfst
@[higher_order tsnd_comp_tsnd]
theorem comp_tsnd {α β₀ β₁ β₂} (g : β₀ → F β₁) (g' : β₁ → G β₂) (x : t α β₀) :
Comp.mk (tsnd g' <$> tsnd g x) = tsnd (Comp.mk ∘ map g' ∘ g) x := by
rw [← comp_bitraverse]
simp only [Function.comp, map_pure]
rfl
#align bitraversable.comp_tsnd Bitraversable.comp_tsnd
open Bifunctor
-- Porting note: This private theorem wasn't needed
-- private theorem pure_eq_id_mk_comp_id {α} : pure = id.mk ∘ @id α := rfl
open Function
@[higher_order]
theorem tfst_eq_fst_id {α α' β} (f : α → α') (x : t α β) :
tfst (F := Id) (pure ∘ f) x = pure (fst f x) := by
apply bitraverse_eq_bimap_id
#align bitraversable.tfst_eq_fst_id Bitraversable.tfst_eq_fst_id
@[higher_order]
| Mathlib/Control/Bitraversable/Lemmas.lean | 116 | 118 | theorem tsnd_eq_snd_id {α β β'} (f : β → β') (x : t α β) :
tsnd (F := Id) (pure ∘ f) x = pure (snd f x) := by |
apply bitraverse_eq_bimap_id
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Isabel Longbottom, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
#align_import set_theory.game.pgame from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8900d545017cd21961daa2a1734bb658ef52c618"
/-!
# Combinatorial (pre-)games.
The basic theory of combinatorial games, following Conway's book `On Numbers and Games`. We
construct "pregames", define an ordering and arithmetic operations on them, then show that the
operations descend to "games", defined via the equivalence relation `p ≈ q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ q ≤ p`.
The surreal numbers will be built as a quotient of a subtype of pregames.
A pregame (`SetTheory.PGame` below) is axiomatised via an inductive type, whose sole constructor
takes two types (thought of as indexing the possible moves for the players Left and Right), and a
pair of functions out of these types to `SetTheory.PGame` (thought of as describing the resulting
game after making a move).
Combinatorial games themselves, as a quotient of pregames, are constructed in `Game.lean`.
## Conway induction
By construction, the induction principle for pregames is exactly "Conway induction". That is, to
prove some predicate `SetTheory.PGame → Prop` holds for all pregames, it suffices to prove
that for every pregame `g`, if the predicate holds for every game resulting from making a move,
then it also holds for `g`.
While it is often convenient to work "by induction" on pregames, in some situations this becomes
awkward, so we also define accessor functions `SetTheory.PGame.LeftMoves`,
`SetTheory.PGame.RightMoves`, `SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft` and `SetTheory.PGame.moveRight`.
There is a relation `PGame.Subsequent p q`, saying that
`p` can be reached by playing some non-empty sequence of moves starting from `q`, an instance
`WellFounded Subsequent`, and a local tactic `pgame_wf_tac` which is helpful for discharging proof
obligations in inductive proofs relying on this relation.
## Order properties
Pregames have both a `≤` and a `<` relation, satisfying the usual properties of a `Preorder`. The
relation `0 < x` means that `x` can always be won by Left, while `0 ≤ x` means that `x` can be won
by Left as the second player.
It turns out to be quite convenient to define various relations on top of these. We define the "less
or fuzzy" relation `x ⧏ y` as `¬ y ≤ x`, the equivalence relation `x ≈ y` as `x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x`, and
the fuzzy relation `x ‖ y` as `x ⧏ y ∧ y ⧏ x`. If `0 ⧏ x`, then `x` can be won by Left as the
first player. If `x ≈ 0`, then `x` can be won by the second player. If `x ‖ 0`, then `x` can be won
by the first player.
Statements like `zero_le_lf`, `zero_lf_le`, etc. unfold these definitions. The theorems `le_def` and
`lf_def` give a recursive characterisation of each relation in terms of themselves two moves later.
The theorems `zero_le`, `zero_lf`, etc. also take into account that `0` has no moves.
Later, games will be defined as the quotient by the `≈` relation; that is to say, the
`Antisymmetrization` of `SetTheory.PGame`.
## Algebraic structures
We next turn to defining the operations necessary to make games into a commutative additive group.
Addition is defined for $x = \{xL | xR\}$ and $y = \{yL | yR\}$ by $x + y = \{xL + y, x + yL | xR +
y, x + yR\}$. Negation is defined by $\{xL | xR\} = \{-xR | -xL\}$.
The order structures interact in the expected way with addition, so we have
```
theorem le_iff_sub_nonneg {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y ↔ 0 ≤ y - x := sorry
theorem lt_iff_sub_pos {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ 0 < y - x := sorry
```
We show that these operations respect the equivalence relation, and hence descend to games. At the
level of games, these operations satisfy all the laws of a commutative group. To prove the necessary
equivalence relations at the level of pregames, we introduce the notion of a `Relabelling` of a
game, and show, for example, that there is a relabelling between `x + (y + z)` and `(x + y) + z`.
## Future work
* The theory of dominated and reversible positions, and unique normal form for short games.
* Analysis of basic domineering positions.
* Hex.
* Temperature.
* The development of surreal numbers, based on this development of combinatorial games, is still
quite incomplete.
## References
The material here is all drawn from
* [Conway, *On numbers and games*][conway2001]
An interested reader may like to formalise some of the material from
* [Andreas Blass, *A game semantics for linear logic*][MR1167694]
* [André Joyal, *Remarques sur la théorie des jeux à deux personnes*][joyal1997]
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace SetTheory
open Function Relation
-- We'd like to be able to use multi-character auto-implicits in this file.
set_option relaxedAutoImplicit true
/-! ### Pre-game moves -/
/-- The type of pre-games, before we have quotiented
by equivalence (`PGame.Setoid`). In ZFC, a combinatorial game is constructed from
two sets of combinatorial games that have been constructed at an earlier
stage. To do this in type theory, we say that a pre-game is built
inductively from two families of pre-games indexed over any type
in Type u. The resulting type `PGame.{u}` lives in `Type (u+1)`,
reflecting that it is a proper class in ZFC. -/
inductive PGame : Type (u + 1)
| mk : ∀ α β : Type u, (α → PGame) → (β → PGame) → PGame
#align pgame SetTheory.PGame
compile_inductive% PGame
namespace PGame
/-- The indexing type for allowable moves by Left. -/
def LeftMoves : PGame → Type u
| mk l _ _ _ => l
#align pgame.left_moves SetTheory.PGame.LeftMoves
/-- The indexing type for allowable moves by Right. -/
def RightMoves : PGame → Type u
| mk _ r _ _ => r
#align pgame.right_moves SetTheory.PGame.RightMoves
/-- The new game after Left makes an allowed move. -/
def moveLeft : ∀ g : PGame, LeftMoves g → PGame
| mk _l _ L _ => L
#align pgame.move_left SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft
/-- The new game after Right makes an allowed move. -/
def moveRight : ∀ g : PGame, RightMoves g → PGame
| mk _ _r _ R => R
#align pgame.move_right SetTheory.PGame.moveRight
@[simp]
theorem leftMoves_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).LeftMoves = xl :=
rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_mk SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_mk
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).moveLeft = xL :=
rfl
#align pgame.move_left_mk SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_mk
@[simp]
theorem rightMoves_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).RightMoves = xr :=
rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_mk SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_mk
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).moveRight = xR :=
rfl
#align pgame.move_right_mk SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_mk
-- TODO define this at the level of games, as well, and perhaps also for finsets of games.
/-- Construct a pre-game from list of pre-games describing the available moves for Left and Right.
-/
def ofLists (L R : List PGame.{u}) : PGame.{u} :=
mk (ULift (Fin L.length)) (ULift (Fin R.length)) (fun i => L.get i.down) fun j ↦ R.get j.down
#align pgame.of_lists SetTheory.PGame.ofLists
theorem leftMoves_ofLists (L R : List PGame) : (ofLists L R).LeftMoves = ULift (Fin L.length) :=
rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_ofLists
theorem rightMoves_ofLists (L R : List PGame) : (ofLists L R).RightMoves = ULift (Fin R.length) :=
rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_ofLists
/-- Converts a number into a left move for `ofLists`. -/
def toOfListsLeftMoves {L R : List PGame} : Fin L.length ≃ (ofLists L R).LeftMoves :=
((Equiv.cast (leftMoves_ofLists L R).symm).trans Equiv.ulift).symm
#align pgame.to_of_lists_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.toOfListsLeftMoves
/-- Converts a number into a right move for `ofLists`. -/
def toOfListsRightMoves {L R : List PGame} : Fin R.length ≃ (ofLists L R).RightMoves :=
((Equiv.cast (rightMoves_ofLists L R).symm).trans Equiv.ulift).symm
#align pgame.to_of_lists_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.toOfListsRightMoves
theorem ofLists_moveLeft {L R : List PGame} (i : Fin L.length) :
(ofLists L R).moveLeft (toOfListsLeftMoves i) = L.get i :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_left SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem ofLists_moveLeft' {L R : List PGame} (i : (ofLists L R).LeftMoves) :
(ofLists L R).moveLeft i = L.get (toOfListsLeftMoves.symm i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_left' SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveLeft'
theorem ofLists_moveRight {L R : List PGame} (i : Fin R.length) :
(ofLists L R).moveRight (toOfListsRightMoves i) = R.get i :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_right SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveRight
@[simp]
theorem ofLists_moveRight' {L R : List PGame} (i : (ofLists L R).RightMoves) :
(ofLists L R).moveRight i = R.get (toOfListsRightMoves.symm i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_right' SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveRight'
/-- A variant of `PGame.recOn` expressed in terms of `PGame.moveLeft` and `PGame.moveRight`.
Both this and `PGame.recOn` describe Conway induction on games. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def moveRecOn {C : PGame → Sort*} (x : PGame)
(IH : ∀ y : PGame, (∀ i, C (y.moveLeft i)) → (∀ j, C (y.moveRight j)) → C y) : C x :=
x.recOn fun yl yr yL yR => IH (mk yl yr yL yR)
#align pgame.move_rec_on SetTheory.PGame.moveRecOn
/-- `IsOption x y` means that `x` is either a left or right option for `y`. -/
@[mk_iff]
inductive IsOption : PGame → PGame → Prop
| moveLeft {x : PGame} (i : x.LeftMoves) : IsOption (x.moveLeft i) x
| moveRight {x : PGame} (i : x.RightMoves) : IsOption (x.moveRight i) x
#align pgame.is_option SetTheory.PGame.IsOption
theorem IsOption.mk_left {xl xr : Type u} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xl) :
(xL i).IsOption (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@IsOption.moveLeft (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.is_option.mk_left SetTheory.PGame.IsOption.mk_left
theorem IsOption.mk_right {xl xr : Type u} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xr) :
(xR i).IsOption (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@IsOption.moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.is_option.mk_right SetTheory.PGame.IsOption.mk_right
theorem wf_isOption : WellFounded IsOption :=
⟨fun x =>
moveRecOn x fun x IHl IHr =>
Acc.intro x fun y h => by
induction' h with _ i _ j
· exact IHl i
· exact IHr j⟩
#align pgame.wf_is_option SetTheory.PGame.wf_isOption
/-- `Subsequent x y` says that `x` can be obtained by playing some nonempty sequence of moves from
`y`. It is the transitive closure of `IsOption`. -/
def Subsequent : PGame → PGame → Prop :=
TransGen IsOption
#align pgame.subsequent SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent
instance : IsTrans _ Subsequent :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsTrans _ (TransGen _)
@[trans]
theorem Subsequent.trans {x y z} : Subsequent x y → Subsequent y z → Subsequent x z :=
TransGen.trans
#align pgame.subsequent.trans SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.trans
theorem wf_subsequent : WellFounded Subsequent :=
wf_isOption.transGen
#align pgame.wf_subsequent SetTheory.PGame.wf_subsequent
instance : WellFoundedRelation PGame :=
⟨_, wf_subsequent⟩
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.moveLeft {x : PGame} (i : x.LeftMoves) : Subsequent (x.moveLeft i) x :=
TransGen.single (IsOption.moveLeft i)
#align pgame.subsequent.move_left SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.moveRight {x : PGame} (j : x.RightMoves) : Subsequent (x.moveRight j) x :=
TransGen.single (IsOption.moveRight j)
#align pgame.subsequent.move_right SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.moveRight
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_left {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xl) :
Subsequent (xL i) (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@Subsequent.moveLeft (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.subsequent.mk_left SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.mk_left
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_right {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j : xr) :
Subsequent (xR j) (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@Subsequent.moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) j
#align pgame.subsequent.mk_right SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.mk_right
/--
Discharges proof obligations of the form `⊢ Subsequent ..` arising in termination proofs
of definitions using well-founded recursion on `PGame`.
-/
macro "pgame_wf_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic| solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 8 })
[Prod.Lex.left, Prod.Lex.right, PSigma.Lex.left, PSigma.Lex.right,
Subsequent.moveLeft, Subsequent.moveRight, Subsequent.mk_left, Subsequent.mk_right,
Subsequent.trans] )
-- Register some consequences of pgame_wf_tac as simp-lemmas for convenience
-- (which are applied by default for WF goals)
-- This is different from mk_right from the POV of the simplifier,
-- because the unifier can't solve `xr =?= RightMoves (mk xl xr xL xR)` at reducible transparency.
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_right' (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j : RightMoves (mk xl xr xL xR)) :
Subsequent (xR j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveRight_mk_left (xL : xl → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xL i).moveRight j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveRight_mk_right (xR : xr → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xR i).moveRight j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveLeft_mk_left (xL : xl → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xL i).moveLeft j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveLeft_mk_right (xR : xr → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xR i).moveLeft j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
-- Porting note: linter claims these lemmas don't simplify?
open Subsequent in attribute [nolint simpNF] mk_left mk_right mk_right'
moveRight_mk_left moveRight_mk_right moveLeft_mk_left moveLeft_mk_right
/-! ### Basic pre-games -/
/-- The pre-game `Zero` is defined by `0 = { | }`. -/
instance : Zero PGame :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, PEmpty, PEmpty.elim, PEmpty.elim⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_leftMoves : LeftMoves 0 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_leftMoves
@[simp]
theorem zero_rightMoves : RightMoves 0 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_rightMoves
instance isEmpty_zero_leftMoves : IsEmpty (LeftMoves 0) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_zero_leftMoves
instance isEmpty_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (RightMoves 0) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_zero_rightMoves
instance : Inhabited PGame :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The pre-game `One` is defined by `1 = { 0 | }`. -/
instance instOnePGame : One PGame :=
⟨⟨PUnit, PEmpty, fun _ => 0, PEmpty.elim⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_leftMoves : LeftMoves 1 = PUnit :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.one_leftMoves
@[simp]
theorem one_moveLeft (x) : moveLeft 1 x = 0 :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_move_left SetTheory.PGame.one_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem one_rightMoves : RightMoves 1 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.one_rightMoves
instance uniqueOneLeftMoves : Unique (LeftMoves 1) :=
PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniqueOneLeftMoves
instance isEmpty_one_rightMoves : IsEmpty (RightMoves 1) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_one_rightMoves
/-! ### Pre-game order relations -/
/-- The less or equal relation on pre-games.
If `0 ≤ x`, then Left can win `x` as the second player. -/
instance le : LE PGame :=
⟨Sym2.GameAdd.fix wf_isOption fun x y le =>
(∀ i, ¬le y (x.moveLeft i) (Sym2.GameAdd.snd_fst <| IsOption.moveLeft i)) ∧
∀ j, ¬le (y.moveRight j) x (Sym2.GameAdd.fst_snd <| IsOption.moveRight j)⟩
/-- The less or fuzzy relation on pre-games.
If `0 ⧏ x`, then Left can win `x` as the first player. -/
def LF (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
¬y ≤ x
#align pgame.lf SetTheory.PGame.LF
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infixl:50 " ⧏ " => PGame.LF
@[simp]
protected theorem not_le {x y : PGame} : ¬x ≤ y ↔ y ⧏ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align pgame.not_le SetTheory.PGame.not_le
@[simp]
theorem not_lf {x y : PGame} : ¬x ⧏ y ↔ y ≤ x :=
Classical.not_not
#align pgame.not_lf SetTheory.PGame.not_lf
theorem _root_.LE.le.not_gf {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y → ¬y ⧏ x :=
not_lf.2
#align has_le.le.not_gf LE.le.not_gf
theorem LF.not_ge {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y → ¬y ≤ x :=
id
#align pgame.lf.not_ge SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_ge
/-- Definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏`.
The ordering here is chosen so that `And.left` refer to moves by Left, and `And.right` refer to
moves by Right. -/
theorem le_iff_forall_lf {x y : PGame} :
x ≤ y ↔ (∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ y) ∧ ∀ j, x ⧏ y.moveRight j := by
unfold LE.le le
simp only
rw [Sym2.GameAdd.fix_eq]
rfl
#align pgame.le_iff_forall_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_iff_forall_lf
/-- Definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games built using the constructor. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk {xl xr xL xR yl yr yL yR} :
mk xl xr xL xR ≤ mk yl yr yL yR ↔ (∀ i, xL i ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR) ∧ ∀ j, mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ yR j :=
le_iff_forall_lf
#align pgame.mk_le_mk SetTheory.PGame.mk_le_mk
theorem le_of_forall_lf {x y : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ y) (h₂ : ∀ j, x ⧏ y.moveRight j) :
x ≤ y :=
le_iff_forall_lf.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align pgame.le_of_forall_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_of_forall_lf
/-- Definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games, in terms of `≤`.
The ordering here is chosen so that `or.inl` refer to moves by Left, and `or.inr` refer to
moves by Right. -/
theorem lf_iff_exists_le {x y : PGame} :
x ⧏ y ↔ (∃ i, x ≤ y.moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ y := by
rw [LF, le_iff_forall_lf, not_and_or]
simp
#align pgame.lf_iff_exists_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_iff_exists_le
/-- Definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games built using the constructor. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_lf_mk {xl xr xL xR yl yr yL yR} :
mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR ↔ (∃ i, mk xl xr xL xR ≤ yL i) ∨ ∃ j, xR j ≤ mk yl yr yL yR :=
lf_iff_exists_le
#align pgame.mk_lf_mk SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf_mk
theorem le_or_gf (x y : PGame) : x ≤ y ∨ y ⧏ x := by
rw [← PGame.not_le]
apply em
#align pgame.le_or_gf SetTheory.PGame.le_or_gf
theorem moveLeft_lf_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) (i) : x.moveLeft i ⧏ y :=
(le_iff_forall_lf.1 h).1 i
#align pgame.move_left_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_lf_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.moveLeft_lf := moveLeft_lf_of_le
#align has_le.le.move_left_lf LE.le.moveLeft_lf
theorem lf_moveRight_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) (j) : x ⧏ y.moveRight j :=
(le_iff_forall_lf.1 h).2 j
#align pgame.lf_move_right_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_moveRight_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.lf_moveRight := lf_moveRight_of_le
#align has_le.le.lf_move_right LE.le.lf_moveRight
theorem lf_of_moveRight_le {x y : PGame} {j} (h : x.moveRight j ≤ y) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_exists_le.2 <| Or.inr ⟨j, h⟩
#align pgame.lf_of_move_right_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_moveRight_le
theorem lf_of_le_moveLeft {x y : PGame} {i} (h : x ≤ y.moveLeft i) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_exists_le.2 <| Or.inl ⟨i, h⟩
#align pgame.lf_of_le_move_left SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_moveLeft
theorem lf_of_le_mk {xl xr xL xR y} : mk xl xr xL xR ≤ y → ∀ i, xL i ⧏ y :=
moveLeft_lf_of_le
#align pgame.lf_of_le_mk SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_mk
theorem lf_of_mk_le {x yl yr yL yR} : x ≤ mk yl yr yL yR → ∀ j, x ⧏ yR j :=
lf_moveRight_of_le
#align pgame.lf_of_mk_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_mk_le
theorem mk_lf_of_le {xl xr y j} (xL) {xR : xr → PGame} : xR j ≤ y → mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ y :=
@lf_of_moveRight_le (mk _ _ _ _) y j
#align pgame.mk_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf_of_le
theorem lf_mk_of_le {x yl yr} {yL : yl → PGame} (yR) {i} : x ≤ yL i → x ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR :=
@lf_of_le_moveLeft x (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.lf_mk_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_mk_of_le
/- We prove that `x ≤ y → y ≤ z → x ≤ z` inductively, by also simultaneously proving its cyclic
reorderings. This auxiliary lemma is used during said induction. -/
private theorem le_trans_aux {x y z : PGame}
(h₁ : ∀ {i}, y ≤ z → z ≤ x.moveLeft i → y ≤ x.moveLeft i)
(h₂ : ∀ {j}, z.moveRight j ≤ x → x ≤ y → z.moveRight j ≤ y) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ z :=
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => PGame.not_le.1 fun h => (h₁ hyz h).not_gf <| hxy.moveLeft_lf i)
fun j => PGame.not_le.1 fun h => (h₂ h hxy).not_gf <| hyz.lf_moveRight j
instance : Preorder PGame :=
{ PGame.le with
le_refl := fun x => by
induction' x with _ _ _ _ IHl IHr
exact
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => lf_of_le_moveLeft (IHl i)) fun i => lf_of_moveRight_le (IHr i)
le_trans := by
suffices
∀ {x y z : PGame},
(x ≤ y → y ≤ z → x ≤ z) ∧ (y ≤ z → z ≤ x → y ≤ x) ∧ (z ≤ x → x ≤ y → z ≤ y) from
fun x y z => this.1
intro x y z
induction' x with xl xr xL xR IHxl IHxr generalizing y z
induction' y with yl yr yL yR IHyl IHyr generalizing z
induction' z with zl zr zL zR IHzl IHzr
exact
⟨le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHxl i).2.1) fun {j} => (IHzr j).2.2,
le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHyl i).2.2) fun {j} => (IHxr j).1,
le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHzl i).1) fun {j} => (IHyr j).2.1⟩
lt := fun x y => x ≤ y ∧ x ⧏ y }
theorem lt_iff_le_and_lf {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ x ⧏ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align pgame.lt_iff_le_and_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_iff_le_and_lf
theorem lt_of_le_of_lf {x y : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : x ⧏ y) : x < y :=
⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align pgame.lt_of_le_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_of_le_of_lf
theorem lf_of_lt {x y : PGame} (h : x < y) : x ⧏ y :=
h.2
#align pgame.lf_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.lf := lf_of_lt
#align has_lt.lt.lf LT.lt.lf
theorem lf_irrefl (x : PGame) : ¬x ⧏ x :=
le_rfl.not_gf
#align pgame.lf_irrefl SetTheory.PGame.lf_irrefl
instance : IsIrrefl _ (· ⧏ ·) :=
⟨lf_irrefl⟩
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_le_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : y ⧏ z) : x ⧏ z := by
rw [← PGame.not_le] at h₂ ⊢
exact fun h₃ => h₂ (h₃.trans h₁)
#align pgame.lf_of_le_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_of_lf
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance : Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ⧏ ·) (· ⧏ ·) := ⟨lf_of_le_of_lf⟩
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_le {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y ≤ z) : x ⧏ z := by
rw [← PGame.not_le] at h₁ ⊢
exact fun h₃ => h₁ (h₂.trans h₃)
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_le
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance : Trans (· ⧏ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ⧏ ·) := ⟨lf_of_lf_of_le⟩
alias _root_.LE.le.trans_lf := lf_of_le_of_lf
#align has_le.le.trans_lf LE.le.trans_lf
alias LF.trans_le := lf_of_lf_of_le
#align pgame.lf.trans_le SetTheory.PGame.LF.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lt_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : y ⧏ z) : x ⧏ z :=
h₁.le.trans_lf h₂
#align pgame.lf_of_lt_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lt_of_lf
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_lt {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y < z) : x ⧏ z :=
h₁.trans_le h₂.le
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.trans_lf := lf_of_lt_of_lf
#align has_lt.lt.trans_lf LT.lt.trans_lf
alias LF.trans_lt := lf_of_lf_of_lt
#align pgame.lf.trans_lt SetTheory.PGame.LF.trans_lt
theorem moveLeft_lf {x : PGame} : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ x :=
le_rfl.moveLeft_lf
#align pgame.move_left_lf SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_lf
theorem lf_moveRight {x : PGame} : ∀ j, x ⧏ x.moveRight j :=
le_rfl.lf_moveRight
#align pgame.lf_move_right SetTheory.PGame.lf_moveRight
theorem lf_mk {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i) : xL i ⧏ mk xl xr xL xR :=
@moveLeft_lf (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.lf_mk SetTheory.PGame.lf_mk
theorem mk_lf {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j) : mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ xR j :=
@lf_moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) j
#align pgame.mk_lf SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf
/-- This special case of `PGame.le_of_forall_lf` is useful when dealing with surreals, where `<` is
preferred over `⧏`. -/
theorem le_of_forall_lt {x y : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i < y) (h₂ : ∀ j, x < y.moveRight j) :
x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => (h₁ i).lf) fun i => (h₂ i).lf
#align pgame.le_of_forall_lt SetTheory.PGame.le_of_forall_lt
/-- The definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games, in terms of `≤` two moves later. -/
theorem le_def {x y : PGame} :
x ≤ y ↔
(∀ i, (∃ i', x.moveLeft i ≤ y.moveLeft i') ∨ ∃ j, (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j ≤ y) ∧
∀ j, (∃ i, x ≤ (y.moveRight j).moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j', x.moveRight j' ≤ y.moveRight j := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
conv =>
lhs
simp only [lf_iff_exists_le]
#align pgame.le_def SetTheory.PGame.le_def
/-- The definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏` two moves later. -/
theorem lf_def {x y : PGame} :
x ⧏ y ↔
(∃ i, (∀ i', x.moveLeft i' ⧏ y.moveLeft i) ∧ ∀ j, x ⧏ (y.moveLeft i).moveRight j) ∨
∃ j, (∀ i, (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i ⧏ y) ∧ ∀ j', x.moveRight j ⧏ y.moveRight j' := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
conv =>
lhs
simp only [le_iff_forall_lf]
#align pgame.lf_def SetTheory.PGame.lf_def
/-- The definition of `0 ≤ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ⧏`. -/
theorem zero_le_lf {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ x ↔ ∀ j, 0 ⧏ x.moveRight j := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
simp
#align pgame.zero_le_lf SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_lf
/-- The definition of `x ≤ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏ 0`. -/
theorem le_zero_lf {x : PGame} : x ≤ 0 ↔ ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ 0 := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
simp
#align pgame.le_zero_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_zero_lf
/-- The definition of `0 ⧏ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ≤`. -/
theorem zero_lf_le {x : PGame} : 0 ⧏ x ↔ ∃ i, 0 ≤ x.moveLeft i := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
simp
#align pgame.zero_lf_le SetTheory.PGame.zero_lf_le
/-- The definition of `x ⧏ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `≤ 0`. -/
theorem lf_zero_le {x : PGame} : x ⧏ 0 ↔ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ 0 := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
simp
#align pgame.lf_zero_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_zero_le
/-- The definition of `0 ≤ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ≤` two moves later. -/
theorem zero_le {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ x ↔ ∀ j, ∃ i, 0 ≤ (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i := by
rw [le_def]
simp
#align pgame.zero_le SetTheory.PGame.zero_le
/-- The definition of `x ≤ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `≤ 0` two moves later. -/
theorem le_zero {x : PGame} : x ≤ 0 ↔ ∀ i, ∃ j, (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j ≤ 0 := by
rw [le_def]
simp
#align pgame.le_zero SetTheory.PGame.le_zero
/-- The definition of `0 ⧏ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ⧏` two moves later. -/
theorem zero_lf {x : PGame} : 0 ⧏ x ↔ ∃ i, ∀ j, 0 ⧏ (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j := by
rw [lf_def]
simp
#align pgame.zero_lf SetTheory.PGame.zero_lf
/-- The definition of `x ⧏ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏ 0` two moves later. -/
theorem lf_zero {x : PGame} : x ⧏ 0 ↔ ∃ j, ∀ i, (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i ⧏ 0 := by
rw [lf_def]
simp
#align pgame.lf_zero SetTheory.PGame.lf_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_le_of_isEmpty_rightMoves (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.RightMoves] : 0 ≤ x :=
zero_le.2 isEmptyElim
#align pgame.zero_le_of_is_empty_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_of_isEmpty_rightMoves
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_of_isEmpty_leftMoves (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.LeftMoves] : x ≤ 0 :=
le_zero.2 isEmptyElim
#align pgame.le_zero_of_is_empty_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.le_zero_of_isEmpty_leftMoves
/-- Given a game won by the right player when they play second, provide a response to any move by
left. -/
noncomputable def rightResponse {x : PGame} (h : x ≤ 0) (i : x.LeftMoves) :
(x.moveLeft i).RightMoves :=
Classical.choose <| (le_zero.1 h) i
#align pgame.right_response SetTheory.PGame.rightResponse
/-- Show that the response for right provided by `rightResponse` preserves the right-player-wins
condition. -/
theorem rightResponse_spec {x : PGame} (h : x ≤ 0) (i : x.LeftMoves) :
(x.moveLeft i).moveRight (rightResponse h i) ≤ 0 :=
Classical.choose_spec <| (le_zero.1 h) i
#align pgame.right_response_spec SetTheory.PGame.rightResponse_spec
/-- Given a game won by the left player when they play second, provide a response to any move by
right. -/
noncomputable def leftResponse {x : PGame} (h : 0 ≤ x) (j : x.RightMoves) :
(x.moveRight j).LeftMoves :=
Classical.choose <| (zero_le.1 h) j
#align pgame.left_response SetTheory.PGame.leftResponse
/-- Show that the response for left provided by `leftResponse` preserves the left-player-wins
condition. -/
theorem leftResponse_spec {x : PGame} (h : 0 ≤ x) (j : x.RightMoves) :
0 ≤ (x.moveRight j).moveLeft (leftResponse h j) :=
Classical.choose_spec <| (zero_le.1 h) j
#align pgame.left_response_spec SetTheory.PGame.leftResponse_spec
#noalign pgame.upper_bound
#noalign pgame.upper_bound_right_moves_empty
#noalign pgame.le_upper_bound
#noalign pgame.upper_bound_mem_upper_bounds
/-- A small family of pre-games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_range_of_small [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → PGame.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) := by
let x : PGame.{u} := ⟨Σ i, (f $ (equivShrink.{u} ι).symm i).LeftMoves, PEmpty,
fun x ↦ moveLeft _ x.2, PEmpty.elim⟩
refine ⟨x, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← (equivShrink ι).symm_apply_apply i, le_iff_forall_lf]
simpa [x] using fun j ↦ @moveLeft_lf x ⟨equivShrink ι i, j⟩
/-- A small set of pre-games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_of_small (s : Set PGame.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s := by
simpa using bddAbove_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → PGame.{u})
#align pgame.bdd_above_of_small SetTheory.PGame.bddAbove_of_small
#noalign pgame.lower_bound
#noalign pgame.lower_bound_left_moves_empty
#noalign pgame.lower_bound_le
#noalign pgame.lower_bound_mem_lower_bounds
/-- A small family of pre-games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_range_of_small [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → PGame.{u}) : BddBelow (Set.range f) := by
let x : PGame.{u} := ⟨PEmpty, Σ i, (f $ (equivShrink.{u} ι).symm i).RightMoves, PEmpty.elim,
fun x ↦ moveRight _ x.2⟩
refine ⟨x, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← (equivShrink ι).symm_apply_apply i, le_iff_forall_lf]
simpa [x] using fun j ↦ @lf_moveRight x ⟨equivShrink ι i, j⟩
/-- A small set of pre-games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_of_small (s : Set PGame.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddBelow s := by
simpa using bddBelow_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → PGame.{u})
#align pgame.bdd_below_of_small SetTheory.PGame.bddBelow_of_small
/-- The equivalence relation on pre-games. Two pre-games `x`, `y` are equivalent if `x ≤ y` and
`y ≤ x`.
If `x ≈ 0`, then the second player can always win `x`. -/
def Equiv (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x
#align pgame.equiv SetTheory.PGame.Equiv
-- Porting note: deleted the scoped notation due to notation overloading with the setoid
-- instance and this causes the PGame.equiv docstring to not show up on hover.
instance : IsEquiv _ PGame.Equiv where
refl _ := ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨xy, yx⟩ ⟨yz, zy⟩ => ⟨xy.trans yz, zy.trans yx⟩
symm _ _ := And.symm
-- Porting note: moved the setoid instance from Basic.lean to here
instance setoid : Setoid PGame :=
⟨Equiv, refl, symm, Trans.trans⟩
#align pgame.setoid SetTheory.PGame.setoid
theorem Equiv.le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≈ y) : x ≤ y :=
h.1
#align pgame.equiv.le SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.le
theorem Equiv.ge {x y : PGame} (h : x ≈ y) : y ≤ x :=
h.2
#align pgame.equiv.ge SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.ge
@[refl, simp]
theorem equiv_rfl {x : PGame} : x ≈ x :=
refl x
#align pgame.equiv_rfl SetTheory.PGame.equiv_rfl
theorem equiv_refl (x : PGame) : x ≈ x :=
refl x
#align pgame.equiv_refl SetTheory.PGame.equiv_refl
@[symm]
protected theorem Equiv.symm {x y : PGame} : (x ≈ y) → (y ≈ x) :=
symm
#align pgame.equiv.symm SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem Equiv.trans {x y z : PGame} : (x ≈ y) → (y ≈ z) → (x ≈ z) :=
_root_.trans
#align pgame.equiv.trans SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_comm {x y : PGame} : (x ≈ y) ↔ (y ≈ x) :=
comm
#align pgame.equiv_comm SetTheory.PGame.equiv_comm
theorem equiv_of_eq {x y : PGame} (h : x = y) : x ≈ y := by subst h; rfl
#align pgame.equiv_of_eq SetTheory.PGame.equiv_of_eq
@[trans]
theorem le_of_le_of_equiv {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : y ≈ z) : x ≤ z :=
h₁.trans h₂.1
#align pgame.le_of_le_of_equiv SetTheory.PGame.le_of_le_of_equiv
instance : Trans
((· ≤ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· ≈ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· ≤ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop) where
trans := le_of_le_of_equiv
@[trans]
theorem le_of_equiv_of_le {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≈ y) : y ≤ z → x ≤ z :=
h₁.1.trans
#align pgame.le_of_equiv_of_le SetTheory.PGame.le_of_equiv_of_le
instance : Trans
((· ≈ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· ≤ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· ≤ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop) where
trans := le_of_equiv_of_le
theorem LF.not_equiv {x y : PGame} (h : x ⧏ y) : ¬(x ≈ y) := fun h' => h.not_ge h'.2
#align pgame.lf.not_equiv SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_equiv
theorem LF.not_equiv' {x y : PGame} (h : x ⧏ y) : ¬(y ≈ x) := fun h' => h.not_ge h'.1
#align pgame.lf.not_equiv' SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_equiv'
theorem LF.not_gt {x y : PGame} (h : x ⧏ y) : ¬y < x := fun h' => h.not_ge h'.le
#align pgame.lf.not_gt SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_gt
theorem le_congr_imp {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) (h : x₁ ≤ y₁) : x₂ ≤ y₂ :=
hx.2.trans (h.trans hy.1)
#align pgame.le_congr_imp SetTheory.PGame.le_congr_imp
theorem le_congr {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ≤ y₁ ↔ x₂ ≤ y₂ :=
⟨le_congr_imp hx hy, le_congr_imp (Equiv.symm hx) (Equiv.symm hy)⟩
#align pgame.le_congr SetTheory.PGame.le_congr
theorem le_congr_left {x₁ x₂ y : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ ≤ y ↔ x₂ ≤ y :=
le_congr hx equiv_rfl
#align pgame.le_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.le_congr_left
theorem le_congr_right {x y₁ y₂ : PGame} (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x ≤ y₁ ↔ x ≤ y₂ :=
le_congr equiv_rfl hy
#align pgame.le_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.le_congr_right
theorem lf_congr {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ⧏ y₁ ↔ x₂ ⧏ y₂ :=
PGame.not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr (le_congr hy hx)).trans PGame.not_le
#align pgame.lf_congr SetTheory.PGame.lf_congr
theorem lf_congr_imp {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ⧏ y₁ → x₂ ⧏ y₂ :=
(lf_congr hx hy).1
#align pgame.lf_congr_imp SetTheory.PGame.lf_congr_imp
theorem lf_congr_left {x₁ x₂ y : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ ⧏ y ↔ x₂ ⧏ y :=
lf_congr hx equiv_rfl
#align pgame.lf_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.lf_congr_left
theorem lf_congr_right {x y₁ y₂ : PGame} (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x ⧏ y₁ ↔ x ⧏ y₂ :=
lf_congr equiv_rfl hy
#align pgame.lf_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.lf_congr_right
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_equiv {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y ≈ z) : x ⧏ z :=
lf_congr_imp equiv_rfl h₂ h₁
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_equiv SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_equiv
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_equiv_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≈ y) : y ⧏ z → x ⧏ z :=
lf_congr_imp (Equiv.symm h₁) equiv_rfl
#align pgame.lf_of_equiv_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_equiv_of_lf
@[trans]
theorem lt_of_lt_of_equiv {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : y ≈ z) : x < z :=
h₁.trans_le h₂.1
#align pgame.lt_of_lt_of_equiv SetTheory.PGame.lt_of_lt_of_equiv
@[trans]
theorem lt_of_equiv_of_lt {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≈ y) : y < z → x < z :=
h₁.1.trans_lt
#align pgame.lt_of_equiv_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lt_of_equiv_of_lt
instance : Trans
((· ≈ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· < ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· < ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop) where
trans := lt_of_equiv_of_lt
theorem lt_congr_imp {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) (h : x₁ < y₁) : x₂ < y₂ :=
hx.2.trans_lt (h.trans_le hy.1)
#align pgame.lt_congr_imp SetTheory.PGame.lt_congr_imp
theorem lt_congr {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ < y₁ ↔ x₂ < y₂ :=
⟨lt_congr_imp hx hy, lt_congr_imp (Equiv.symm hx) (Equiv.symm hy)⟩
#align pgame.lt_congr SetTheory.PGame.lt_congr
theorem lt_congr_left {x₁ x₂ y : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ < y ↔ x₂ < y :=
lt_congr hx equiv_rfl
#align pgame.lt_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.lt_congr_left
theorem lt_congr_right {x y₁ y₂ : PGame} (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x < y₁ ↔ x < y₂ :=
lt_congr equiv_rfl hy
#align pgame.lt_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.lt_congr_right
theorem lt_or_equiv_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) : x < y ∨ (x ≈ y) :=
and_or_left.mp ⟨h, (em <| y ≤ x).symm.imp_left PGame.not_le.1⟩
#align pgame.lt_or_equiv_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lt_or_equiv_of_le
theorem lf_or_equiv_or_gf (x y : PGame) : x ⧏ y ∨ (x ≈ y) ∨ y ⧏ x := by
by_cases h : x ⧏ y
· exact Or.inl h
· right
cases' lt_or_equiv_of_le (PGame.not_lf.1 h) with h' h'
· exact Or.inr h'.lf
· exact Or.inl (Equiv.symm h')
#align pgame.lf_or_equiv_or_gf SetTheory.PGame.lf_or_equiv_or_gf
theorem equiv_congr_left {y₁ y₂ : PGame} : (y₁ ≈ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁, (x₁ ≈ y₁) ↔ (x₁ ≈ y₂) :=
⟨fun h _ => ⟨fun h' => Equiv.trans h' h, fun h' => Equiv.trans h' (Equiv.symm h)⟩,
fun h => (h y₁).1 <| equiv_rfl⟩
#align pgame.equiv_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.equiv_congr_left
theorem equiv_congr_right {x₁ x₂ : PGame} : (x₁ ≈ x₂) ↔ ∀ y₁, (x₁ ≈ y₁) ↔ (x₂ ≈ y₁) :=
⟨fun h _ => ⟨fun h' => Equiv.trans (Equiv.symm h) h', fun h' => Equiv.trans h h'⟩,
fun h => (h x₂).2 <| equiv_rfl⟩
#align pgame.equiv_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.equiv_congr_right
theorem equiv_of_mk_equiv {x y : PGame} (L : x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves)
(R : x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves) (hl : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ≈ y.moveLeft (L i))
(hr : ∀ j, x.moveRight j ≈ y.moveRight (R j)) : x ≈ y := by
constructor <;> rw [le_def]
· exact ⟨fun i => Or.inl ⟨_, (hl i).1⟩, fun j => Or.inr ⟨_, by simpa using (hr (R.symm j)).1⟩⟩
· exact ⟨fun i => Or.inl ⟨_, by simpa using (hl (L.symm i)).2⟩, fun j => Or.inr ⟨_, (hr j).2⟩⟩
#align pgame.equiv_of_mk_equiv SetTheory.PGame.equiv_of_mk_equiv
/-- The fuzzy, confused, or incomparable relation on pre-games.
If `x ‖ 0`, then the first player can always win `x`. -/
def Fuzzy (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
x ⧏ y ∧ y ⧏ x
#align pgame.fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infixl:50 " ‖ " => PGame.Fuzzy
@[symm]
theorem Fuzzy.swap {x y : PGame} : x ‖ y → y ‖ x :=
And.symm
#align pgame.fuzzy.swap SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.swap
instance : IsSymm _ (· ‖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Fuzzy.swap⟩
theorem Fuzzy.swap_iff {x y : PGame} : x ‖ y ↔ y ‖ x :=
⟨Fuzzy.swap, Fuzzy.swap⟩
#align pgame.fuzzy.swap_iff SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.swap_iff
theorem fuzzy_irrefl (x : PGame) : ¬x ‖ x := fun h => lf_irrefl x h.1
#align pgame.fuzzy_irrefl SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_irrefl
instance : IsIrrefl _ (· ‖ ·) :=
⟨fuzzy_irrefl⟩
theorem lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y ↔ x < y ∨ x ‖ y := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_lf, Fuzzy, ← PGame.not_le]
tauto
#align pgame.lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy
theorem lf_of_fuzzy {x y : PGame} (h : x ‖ y) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy.2 (Or.inr h)
#align pgame.lf_of_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_fuzzy
alias Fuzzy.lf := lf_of_fuzzy
#align pgame.fuzzy.lf SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.lf
theorem lt_or_fuzzy_of_lf {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y → x < y ∨ x ‖ y :=
lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy.1
#align pgame.lt_or_fuzzy_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_or_fuzzy_of_lf
theorem Fuzzy.not_equiv {x y : PGame} (h : x ‖ y) : ¬(x ≈ y) := fun h' => h'.1.not_gf h.2
#align pgame.fuzzy.not_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.not_equiv
theorem Fuzzy.not_equiv' {x y : PGame} (h : x ‖ y) : ¬(y ≈ x) := fun h' => h'.2.not_gf h.2
#align pgame.fuzzy.not_equiv' SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.not_equiv'
theorem not_fuzzy_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) : ¬x ‖ y := fun h' => h'.2.not_ge h
#align pgame.not_fuzzy_of_le SetTheory.PGame.not_fuzzy_of_le
theorem not_fuzzy_of_ge {x y : PGame} (h : y ≤ x) : ¬x ‖ y := fun h' => h'.1.not_ge h
#align pgame.not_fuzzy_of_ge SetTheory.PGame.not_fuzzy_of_ge
theorem Equiv.not_fuzzy {x y : PGame} (h : x ≈ y) : ¬x ‖ y :=
not_fuzzy_of_le h.1
#align pgame.equiv.not_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.not_fuzzy
theorem Equiv.not_fuzzy' {x y : PGame} (h : x ≈ y) : ¬y ‖ x :=
not_fuzzy_of_le h.2
#align pgame.equiv.not_fuzzy' SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.not_fuzzy'
theorem fuzzy_congr {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ‖ y₁ ↔ x₂ ‖ y₂ :=
show _ ∧ _ ↔ _ ∧ _ by rw [lf_congr hx hy, lf_congr hy hx]
#align pgame.fuzzy_congr SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_congr
theorem fuzzy_congr_imp {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ‖ y₁ → x₂ ‖ y₂ :=
(fuzzy_congr hx hy).1
#align pgame.fuzzy_congr_imp SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_congr_imp
theorem fuzzy_congr_left {x₁ x₂ y : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ ‖ y ↔ x₂ ‖ y :=
fuzzy_congr hx equiv_rfl
#align pgame.fuzzy_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_congr_left
theorem fuzzy_congr_right {x y₁ y₂ : PGame} (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x ‖ y₁ ↔ x ‖ y₂ :=
fuzzy_congr equiv_rfl hy
#align pgame.fuzzy_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_congr_right
@[trans]
theorem fuzzy_of_fuzzy_of_equiv {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ‖ y) (h₂ : y ≈ z) : x ‖ z :=
(fuzzy_congr_right h₂).1 h₁
#align pgame.fuzzy_of_fuzzy_of_equiv SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_of_fuzzy_of_equiv
@[trans]
theorem fuzzy_of_equiv_of_fuzzy {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≈ y) (h₂ : y ‖ z) : x ‖ z :=
(fuzzy_congr_left h₁).2 h₂
#align pgame.fuzzy_of_equiv_of_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_of_equiv_of_fuzzy
/-- Exactly one of the following is true (although we don't prove this here). -/
theorem lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy (x y : PGame) : x < y ∨ (x ≈ y) ∨ y < x ∨ x ‖ y := by
cases' le_or_gf x y with h₁ h₁ <;> cases' le_or_gf y x with h₂ h₂
· right
left
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
· left
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
· right
right
left
exact ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
· right
right
right
exact ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align pgame.lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy
theorem lt_or_equiv_or_gf (x y : PGame) : x < y ∨ (x ≈ y) ∨ y ⧏ x := by
rw [lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy, Fuzzy.swap_iff]
exact lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy x y
#align pgame.lt_or_equiv_or_gf SetTheory.PGame.lt_or_equiv_or_gf
/-! ### Relabellings -/
/-- `Relabelling x y` says that `x` and `y` are really the same game, just dressed up differently.
Specifically, there is a bijection between the moves for Left in `x` and in `y`, and similarly
for Right, and under these bijections we inductively have `Relabelling`s for the consequent games.
-/
inductive Relabelling : PGame.{u} → PGame.{u} → Type (u + 1)
|
mk :
∀ {x y : PGame} (L : x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves) (R : x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves),
(∀ i, Relabelling (x.moveLeft i) (y.moveLeft (L i))) →
(∀ j, Relabelling (x.moveRight j) (y.moveRight (R j))) → Relabelling x y
#align pgame.relabelling SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infixl:50 " ≡r " => PGame.Relabelling
namespace Relabelling
variable {x y : PGame.{u}}
/-- A constructor for relabellings swapping the equivalences. -/
def mk' (L : y.LeftMoves ≃ x.LeftMoves) (R : y.RightMoves ≃ x.RightMoves)
(hL : ∀ i, x.moveLeft (L i) ≡r y.moveLeft i) (hR : ∀ j, x.moveRight (R j) ≡r y.moveRight j) :
x ≡r y :=
⟨L.symm, R.symm, fun i => by simpa using hL (L.symm i), fun j => by simpa using hR (R.symm j)⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.mk' SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk'
/-- The equivalence between left moves of `x` and `y` given by the relabelling. -/
def leftMovesEquiv : x ≡r y → x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves
| ⟨L,_, _,_⟩ => L
#align pgame.relabelling.left_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.leftMovesEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mk_leftMovesEquiv {x y L R hL hR} : (@Relabelling.mk x y L R hL hR).leftMovesEquiv = L :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabelling.mk_left_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk_leftMovesEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mk'_leftMovesEquiv {x y L R hL hR} :
(@Relabelling.mk' x y L R hL hR).leftMovesEquiv = L.symm :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabelling.mk'_left_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk'_leftMovesEquiv
/-- The equivalence between right moves of `x` and `y` given by the relabelling. -/
def rightMovesEquiv : x ≡r y → x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves
| ⟨_, R, _, _⟩ => R
#align pgame.relabelling.right_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.rightMovesEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mk_rightMovesEquiv {x y L R hL hR} : (@Relabelling.mk x y L R hL hR).rightMovesEquiv = R :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabelling.mk_right_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk_rightMovesEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mk'_rightMovesEquiv {x y L R hL hR} :
(@Relabelling.mk' x y L R hL hR).rightMovesEquiv = R.symm :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabelling.mk'_right_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk'_rightMovesEquiv
/-- A left move of `x` is a relabelling of a left move of `y`. -/
def moveLeft : ∀ (r : x ≡r y) (i : x.LeftMoves), x.moveLeft i ≡r y.moveLeft (r.leftMovesEquiv i)
| ⟨_, _, hL, _⟩ => hL
#align pgame.relabelling.move_left SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.moveLeft
/-- A left move of `y` is a relabelling of a left move of `x`. -/
def moveLeftSymm :
∀ (r : x ≡r y) (i : y.LeftMoves), x.moveLeft (r.leftMovesEquiv.symm i) ≡r y.moveLeft i
| ⟨L, R, hL, hR⟩, i => by simpa using hL (L.symm i)
#align pgame.relabelling.move_left_symm SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.moveLeftSymm
/-- A right move of `x` is a relabelling of a right move of `y`. -/
def moveRight :
∀ (r : x ≡r y) (i : x.RightMoves), x.moveRight i ≡r y.moveRight (r.rightMovesEquiv i)
| ⟨_, _, _, hR⟩ => hR
#align pgame.relabelling.move_right SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.moveRight
/-- A right move of `y` is a relabelling of a right move of `x`. -/
def moveRightSymm :
∀ (r : x ≡r y) (i : y.RightMoves), x.moveRight (r.rightMovesEquiv.symm i) ≡r y.moveRight i
| ⟨L, R, hL, hR⟩, i => by simpa using hR (R.symm i)
#align pgame.relabelling.move_right_symm SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.moveRightSymm
/-- The identity relabelling. -/
@[refl]
def refl (x : PGame) : x ≡r x :=
⟨Equiv.refl _, Equiv.refl _, fun i => refl _, fun j => refl _⟩
termination_by x
#align pgame.relabelling.refl SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.refl
instance (x : PGame) : Inhabited (x ≡r x) :=
⟨refl _⟩
/-- Flip a relabelling. -/
@[symm]
def symm : ∀ {x y : PGame}, x ≡r y → y ≡r x
| _, _, ⟨L, R, hL, hR⟩ => mk' L R (fun i => (hL i).symm) fun j => (hR j).symm
#align pgame.relabelling.symm SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.symm
theorem le {x y : PGame} (r : x ≡r y) : x ≤ y :=
le_def.2
⟨fun i => Or.inl ⟨_, (r.moveLeft i).le⟩, fun j =>
Or.inr ⟨_, (r.moveRightSymm j).le⟩⟩
termination_by x
#align pgame.relabelling.le SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.le
theorem ge {x y : PGame} (r : x ≡r y) : y ≤ x :=
r.symm.le
#align pgame.relabelling.ge SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.ge
/-- A relabelling lets us prove equivalence of games. -/
theorem equiv (r : x ≡r y) : x ≈ y :=
⟨r.le, r.ge⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.equiv
/-- Transitivity of relabelling. -/
@[trans]
def trans : ∀ {x y z : PGame}, x ≡r y → y ≡r z → x ≡r z
| _, _, _, ⟨L₁, R₁, hL₁, hR₁⟩, ⟨L₂, R₂, hL₂, hR₂⟩ =>
⟨L₁.trans L₂, R₁.trans R₂, fun i => (hL₁ i).trans (hL₂ _), fun j => (hR₁ j).trans (hR₂ _)⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.trans SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.trans
/-- Any game without left or right moves is a relabelling of 0. -/
def isEmpty (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.LeftMoves] [IsEmpty x.RightMoves] : x ≡r 0 :=
⟨Equiv.equivPEmpty _, Equiv.equivOfIsEmpty _ _, isEmptyElim, isEmptyElim⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.is_empty SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.isEmpty
end Relabelling
theorem Equiv.isEmpty (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.LeftMoves] [IsEmpty x.RightMoves] : x ≈ 0 :=
(Relabelling.isEmpty x).equiv
#align pgame.equiv.is_empty SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.isEmpty
instance {x y : PGame} : Coe (x ≡r y) (x ≈ y) :=
⟨Relabelling.equiv⟩
/-- Replace the types indexing the next moves for Left and Right by equivalent types. -/
def relabel {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves) : PGame :=
⟨xl', xr', x.moveLeft ∘ el, x.moveRight ∘ er⟩
#align pgame.relabel SetTheory.PGame.relabel
@[simp]
theorem relabel_moveLeft' {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves)
(i : xl') : moveLeft (relabel el er) i = x.moveLeft (el i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabel_move_left' SetTheory.PGame.relabel_moveLeft'
theorem relabel_moveLeft {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves)
(i : x.LeftMoves) : moveLeft (relabel el er) (el.symm i) = x.moveLeft i := by simp
#align pgame.relabel_move_left SetTheory.PGame.relabel_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem relabel_moveRight' {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves)
(j : xr') : moveRight (relabel el er) j = x.moveRight (er j) :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabel_move_right' SetTheory.PGame.relabel_moveRight'
theorem relabel_moveRight {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves)
(j : x.RightMoves) : moveRight (relabel el er) (er.symm j) = x.moveRight j := by simp
#align pgame.relabel_move_right SetTheory.PGame.relabel_moveRight
/-- The game obtained by relabelling the next moves is a relabelling of the original game. -/
def relabelRelabelling {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves) :
x ≡r relabel el er :=
-- Porting note: needed to add `rfl`
Relabelling.mk' el er (fun i => by simp; rfl) (fun j => by simp; rfl)
#align pgame.relabel_relabelling SetTheory.PGame.relabelRelabelling
/-! ### Negation -/
/-- The negation of `{L | R}` is `{-R | -L}`. -/
def neg : PGame → PGame
| ⟨l, r, L, R⟩ => ⟨r, l, fun i => neg (R i), fun i => neg (L i)⟩
#align pgame.neg SetTheory.PGame.neg
instance : Neg PGame :=
⟨neg⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_def {xl xr xL xR} : -mk xl xr xL xR = mk xr xl (fun j => -xR j) fun i => -xL i :=
rfl
#align pgame.neg_def SetTheory.PGame.neg_def
instance : InvolutiveNeg PGame :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Neg PGame) with
neg_neg := fun x => by
induction' x with xl xr xL xR ihL ihR
simp_rw [neg_def, ihL, ihR] }
instance : NegZeroClass PGame :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Zero PGame), inferInstanceAs (Neg PGame) with
neg_zero := by
dsimp [Zero.zero, Neg.neg, neg]
congr <;> funext i <;> cases i }
@[simp]
theorem neg_ofLists (L R : List PGame) :
-ofLists L R = ofLists (R.map fun x => -x) (L.map fun x => -x) := by
simp only [ofLists, neg_def, List.get_map, mk.injEq, List.length_map, true_and]
constructor
all_goals
apply hfunext
· simp
· rintro ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩ ⟨⟨b, hb⟩⟩ h
have :
∀ {m n} (_ : m = n) {b : ULift (Fin m)} {c : ULift (Fin n)} (_ : HEq b c),
(b.down : ℕ) = ↑c.down := by
rintro m n rfl b c
simp only [heq_eq_eq]
rintro rfl
rfl
congr 5
exact this (List.length_map _ _).symm h
#align pgame.neg_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.neg_ofLists
theorem isOption_neg {x y : PGame} : IsOption x (-y) ↔ IsOption (-x) y := by
rw [isOption_iff, isOption_iff, or_comm]
cases y;
apply or_congr <;>
· apply exists_congr
intro
rw [neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
rfl
#align pgame.is_option_neg SetTheory.PGame.isOption_neg
@[simp]
theorem isOption_neg_neg {x y : PGame} : IsOption (-x) (-y) ↔ IsOption x y := by
rw [isOption_neg, neg_neg]
#align pgame.is_option_neg_neg SetTheory.PGame.isOption_neg_neg
theorem leftMoves_neg : ∀ x : PGame, (-x).LeftMoves = x.RightMoves
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_neg SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_neg
theorem rightMoves_neg : ∀ x : PGame, (-x).RightMoves = x.LeftMoves
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_neg SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_neg
/-- Turns a right move for `x` into a left move for `-x` and vice versa.
Even though these types are the same (not definitionally so), this is the preferred way to convert
between them. -/
def toLeftMovesNeg {x : PGame} : x.RightMoves ≃ (-x).LeftMoves :=
Equiv.cast (leftMoves_neg x).symm
#align pgame.to_left_moves_neg SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNeg
/-- Turns a left move for `x` into a right move for `-x` and vice versa.
Even though these types are the same (not definitionally so), this is the preferred way to convert
between them. -/
def toRightMovesNeg {x : PGame} : x.LeftMoves ≃ (-x).RightMoves :=
Equiv.cast (rightMoves_neg x).symm
#align pgame.to_right_moves_neg SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNeg
theorem moveLeft_neg {x : PGame} (i) : (-x).moveLeft (toLeftMovesNeg i) = -x.moveRight i := by
cases x
rfl
#align pgame.move_left_neg SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_neg
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_neg' {x : PGame} (i) : (-x).moveLeft i = -x.moveRight (toLeftMovesNeg.symm i) := by
cases x
rfl
#align pgame.move_left_neg' SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_neg'
theorem moveRight_neg {x : PGame} (i) : (-x).moveRight (toRightMovesNeg i) = -x.moveLeft i := by
cases x
rfl
#align pgame.move_right_neg SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_neg
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_neg' {x : PGame} (i) :
(-x).moveRight i = -x.moveLeft (toRightMovesNeg.symm i) := by
cases x
rfl
#align pgame.move_right_neg' SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_neg'
theorem moveLeft_neg_symm {x : PGame} (i) :
x.moveLeft (toRightMovesNeg.symm i) = -(-x).moveRight i := by simp
#align pgame.move_left_neg_symm SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_neg_symm
theorem moveLeft_neg_symm' {x : PGame} (i) :
x.moveLeft i = -(-x).moveRight (toRightMovesNeg i) := by simp
#align pgame.move_left_neg_symm' SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_neg_symm'
theorem moveRight_neg_symm {x : PGame} (i) :
x.moveRight (toLeftMovesNeg.symm i) = -(-x).moveLeft i := by simp
#align pgame.move_right_neg_symm SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_neg_symm
theorem moveRight_neg_symm' {x : PGame} (i) :
x.moveRight i = -(-x).moveLeft (toLeftMovesNeg i) := by simp
#align pgame.move_right_neg_symm' SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_neg_symm'
/-- If `x` has the same moves as `y`, then `-x` has the same moves as `-y`. -/
def Relabelling.negCongr : ∀ {x y : PGame}, x ≡r y → -x ≡r -y
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨L, R, hL, hR⟩ =>
⟨R, L, fun j => (hR j).negCongr, fun i => (hL i).negCongr⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.neg_congr SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.negCongr
private theorem neg_le_lf_neg_iff : ∀ {x y : PGame.{u}}, (-y ≤ -x ↔ x ≤ y) ∧ (-y ⧏ -x ↔ x ⧏ y)
| mk xl xr xL xR, mk yl yr yL yR => by
simp_rw [neg_def, mk_le_mk, mk_lf_mk, ← neg_def]
constructor
· rw [and_comm]
apply and_congr <;> exact forall_congr' fun _ => neg_le_lf_neg_iff.2
· rw [or_comm]
apply or_congr <;> exact exists_congr fun _ => neg_le_lf_neg_iff.1
termination_by x y => (x, y)
@[simp]
theorem neg_le_neg_iff {x y : PGame} : -y ≤ -x ↔ x ≤ y :=
neg_le_lf_neg_iff.1
#align pgame.neg_le_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_le_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_lf_neg_iff {x y : PGame} : -y ⧏ -x ↔ x ⧏ y :=
neg_le_lf_neg_iff.2
#align pgame.neg_lf_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_lf_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_lt_neg_iff {x y : PGame} : -y < -x ↔ x < y := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_lf, lt_iff_le_and_lf, neg_le_neg_iff, neg_lf_neg_iff]
#align pgame.neg_lt_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_lt_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_equiv_neg_iff {x y : PGame} : (-x ≈ -y) ↔ (x ≈ y) := by
show Equiv (-x) (-y) ↔ Equiv x y
rw [Equiv, Equiv, neg_le_neg_iff, neg_le_neg_iff, and_comm]
#align pgame.neg_equiv_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_equiv_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_fuzzy_neg_iff {x y : PGame} : -x ‖ -y ↔ x ‖ y := by
rw [Fuzzy, Fuzzy, neg_lf_neg_iff, neg_lf_neg_iff, and_comm]
#align pgame.neg_fuzzy_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_fuzzy_neg_iff
theorem neg_le_iff {x y : PGame} : -y ≤ x ↔ -x ≤ y := by rw [← neg_neg x, neg_le_neg_iff, neg_neg]
#align pgame.neg_le_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_le_iff
theorem neg_lf_iff {x y : PGame} : -y ⧏ x ↔ -x ⧏ y := by rw [← neg_neg x, neg_lf_neg_iff, neg_neg]
#align pgame.neg_lf_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_lf_iff
theorem neg_lt_iff {x y : PGame} : -y < x ↔ -x < y := by rw [← neg_neg x, neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_neg]
#align pgame.neg_lt_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_lt_iff
theorem neg_equiv_iff {x y : PGame} : (-x ≈ y) ↔ (x ≈ -y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, neg_equiv_neg_iff, neg_neg]
#align pgame.neg_equiv_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_equiv_iff
theorem neg_fuzzy_iff {x y : PGame} : -x ‖ y ↔ x ‖ -y := by
rw [← neg_neg y, neg_fuzzy_neg_iff, neg_neg]
#align pgame.neg_fuzzy_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_fuzzy_iff
theorem le_neg_iff {x y : PGame} : y ≤ -x ↔ x ≤ -y := by rw [← neg_neg x, neg_le_neg_iff, neg_neg]
#align pgame.le_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.le_neg_iff
theorem lf_neg_iff {x y : PGame} : y ⧏ -x ↔ x ⧏ -y := by rw [← neg_neg x, neg_lf_neg_iff, neg_neg]
#align pgame.lf_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.lf_neg_iff
theorem lt_neg_iff {x y : PGame} : y < -x ↔ x < -y := by rw [← neg_neg x, neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_neg]
#align pgame.lt_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.lt_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_le_zero_iff {x : PGame} : -x ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ x := by rw [neg_le_iff, neg_zero]
#align pgame.neg_le_zero_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_le_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_le_neg_iff {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ -x ↔ x ≤ 0 := by rw [le_neg_iff, neg_zero]
#align pgame.zero_le_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_lf_zero_iff {x : PGame} : -x ⧏ 0 ↔ 0 ⧏ x := by rw [neg_lf_iff, neg_zero]
#align pgame.neg_lf_zero_iff SetTheory.PGame.neg_lf_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_lf_neg_iff {x : PGame} : 0 ⧏ -x ↔ x ⧏ 0 := by rw [lf_neg_iff, neg_zero]
#align pgame.zero_lf_neg_iff SetTheory.PGame.zero_lf_neg_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/PGame.lean | 1,453 | 1,453 | theorem neg_lt_zero_iff {x : PGame} : -x < 0 ↔ 0 < x := by | rw [neg_lt_iff, neg_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRightNhds
#align_import topology.algebra.order.group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84dc0bd6619acaea625086d6f53cb35cdd554219"
/-!
# Topology on a linear ordered additive commutative group
In this file we prove that a linear ordered additive commutative group with order topology is a
topological group. We also prove continuity of `abs : G → G` and provide convenience lemmas like
`ContinuousAt.abs`.
-/
open Set Filter
open Topology Filter
variable {α G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup G] [OrderTopology G]
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → G}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.topologicalAddGroup :
TopologicalAddGroup G where
continuous_add := by
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
refine LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases dense_or_discrete 0 ε with (⟨δ, δ0, δε⟩ | ⟨_h₁, h₂⟩)
· -- If there exists `δ ∈ (0, ε)`, then we choose `δ`-nhd of `a` and `(ε-δ)`-nhd of `b`
filter_upwards [(eventually_abs_sub_lt a δ0).prod_nhds
(eventually_abs_sub_lt b (sub_pos.2 δε))]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx : |x - a| < δ, hy : |y - b| < ε - δ⟩
rw [add_sub_add_comm]
calc
|x - a + (y - b)| ≤ |x - a| + |y - b| := abs_add _ _
_ < δ + (ε - δ) := add_lt_add hx hy
_ = ε := add_sub_cancel _ _
· -- Otherwise `ε`-nhd of each point `a` is `{a}`
have hε : ∀ {x y}, |x - y| < ε → x = y := by
intro x y h
simpa [sub_eq_zero] using h₂ _ h
filter_upwards [(eventually_abs_sub_lt a ε0).prod_nhds (eventually_abs_sub_lt b ε0)]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx : |x - a| < ε, hy : |y - b| < ε⟩
simpa [hε hx, hε hy]
continuous_neg :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun a =>
LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds.2 fun ε ε0 =>
(eventually_abs_sub_lt a ε0).mono fun x hx => by rwa [neg_sub_neg, abs_sub_comm]
#align linear_ordered_add_comm_group.topological_add_group LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.topologicalAddGroup
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_abs : Continuous (abs : G → G) :=
continuous_id.max continuous_neg
#align continuous_abs continuous_abs
protected theorem Filter.Tendsto.abs {a : G} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun x => |f x|) l (𝓝 |a|) :=
(continuous_abs.tendsto _).comp h
#align filter.tendsto.abs Filter.Tendsto.abs
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Order/Group.lean | 67 | 73 | theorem tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero (f : α → G) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 0) ↔ Tendsto (abs ∘ f) l (𝓝 0) := by |
refine ⟨fun h => (abs_zero : |(0 : G)| = 0) ▸ h.abs, fun h => ?_⟩
have : Tendsto (fun a => -|f a|) l (𝓝 0) := (neg_zero : -(0 : G) = 0) ▸ h.neg
exact
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le this h (fun x => neg_abs_le <| f x) fun x =>
le_abs_self <| f x
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
#align_import data.nat.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e00d81bdcbf77c8188bbd18f5524ddc3ed8cac6"
/-!
# Natural number logarithms
This file defines two `ℕ`-valued analogs of the logarithm of `n` with base `b`:
* `log b n`: Lower logarithm, or floor **log**. Greatest `k` such that `b^k ≤ n`.
* `clog b n`: Upper logarithm, or **c**eil **log**. Least `k` such that `n ≤ b^k`.
These are interesting because, for `1 < b`, `Nat.log b` and `Nat.clog b` are respectively right and
left adjoints of `Nat.pow b`. See `pow_le_iff_le_log` and `le_pow_iff_clog_le`.
-/
namespace Nat
/-! ### Floor logarithm -/
/-- `log b n`, is the logarithm of natural number `n` in base `b`. It returns the largest `k : ℕ`
such that `b^k ≤ n`, so if `b^k = n`, it returns exactly `k`. -/
--@[pp_nodot] porting note: unknown attribute
def log (b : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| n => if h : b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b then log b (n / b) + 1 else 0
decreasing_by
-- putting this in the def triggers the `unusedHavesSuffices` linter:
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/428
have : n / b < n := div_lt_self ((Nat.zero_lt_one.trans h.2).trans_le h.1) h.2
decreasing_trivial
#align nat.log Nat.log
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 0 ↔ n < b ∨ b ≤ 1 := by
rw [log, dite_eq_right_iff]
simp only [Nat.add_eq_zero_iff, Nat.one_ne_zero, and_false, imp_false, not_and_or, not_le, not_lt]
#align nat.log_eq_zero_iff Nat.log_eq_zero_iff
theorem log_of_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : n < b) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inl hb)
#align nat.log_of_lt Nat.log_of_lt
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (n) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inr hb)
#align nat.log_of_left_le_one Nat.log_of_left_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_pos_iff {b n : ℕ} : 0 < log b n ↔ b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b := by
rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, log_eq_zero_iff, not_or, not_lt, not_le]
#align nat.log_pos_iff Nat.log_pos_iff
theorem log_pos {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hbn : b ≤ n) : 0 < log b n :=
log_pos_iff.2 ⟨hbn, hb⟩
#align nat.log_pos Nat.log_pos
theorem log_of_one_lt_of_le {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (hn : b ≤ n) : log b n = log b (n / b) + 1 := by
rw [log]
exact if_pos ⟨hn, h⟩
#align nat.log_of_one_lt_of_le Nat.log_of_one_lt_of_le
@[simp] lemma log_zero_left : ∀ n, log 0 n = 0 := log_of_left_le_one $ Nat.zero_le _
#align nat.log_zero_left Nat.log_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : ℕ) : log b 0 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (le_total 1 b)
#align nat.log_zero_right Nat.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ n, log 1 n = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
#align nat.log_one_left Nat.log_one_left
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : ℕ) : log b 1 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (lt_or_le _ _)
#align nat.log_one_right Nat.log_one_right
/-- `pow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection. See also `Nat.pow_le_of_le_log` and
`Nat.le_log_of_pow_le` for individual implications under weaker assumptions. -/
theorem pow_le_iff_le_log {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
b ^ x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ log b y := by
induction' y using Nat.strong_induction_on with y ih generalizing x
cases x with
| zero => dsimp; omega
| succ x =>
rw [log]; split_ifs with h
· have b_pos : 0 < b := lt_of_succ_lt hb
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← ih (y / b) (div_lt_self
(Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hy) hb) (Nat.div_pos h.1 b_pos).ne', le_div_iff_mul_le b_pos,
pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm]
· exact iff_of_false (fun hby => h ⟨(le_self_pow x.succ_ne_zero _).trans hby, hb⟩)
(not_succ_le_zero _)
#align nat.pow_le_iff_le_log Nat.pow_le_iff_le_log
theorem lt_pow_iff_log_lt {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x ↔ log b y < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy)
#align nat.lt_pow_iff_log_lt Nat.lt_pow_iff_log_lt
theorem pow_le_of_le_log {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (h : x ≤ log b y) : b ^ x ≤ y := by
refine (le_or_lt b 1).elim (fun hb => ?_) fun hb => (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).2 h
rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.le_zero] at h
rwa [h, Nat.pow_zero, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.pow_le_of_le_log Nat.pow_le_of_le_log
theorem le_log_of_pow_le {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (h : b ^ x ≤ y) : x ≤ log b y := by
rcases ne_or_eq y 0 with (hy | rfl)
exacts [(pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).1 h, (h.not_lt (Nat.pow_pos (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb))).elim]
#align nat.le_log_of_pow_le Nat.le_log_of_pow_le
theorem pow_log_le_self (b : ℕ) {x : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
pow_le_of_le_log hx le_rfl
#align nat.pow_log_le_self Nat.pow_log_le_self
theorem log_lt_of_lt_pow {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x → log b y < x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (pow_le_of_le_log hy)
#align nat.log_lt_of_lt_pow Nat.log_lt_of_lt_pow
theorem lt_pow_of_log_lt {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : log b y < x → y < b ^ x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (le_log_of_pow_le hb)
#align nat.lt_pow_of_log_lt Nat.lt_pow_of_log_lt
theorem lt_pow_succ_log_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : x < b ^ (log b x).succ :=
lt_pow_of_log_lt hb (lt_succ_self _)
#align nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self Nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self
theorem log_eq_iff {b m n : ℕ} (h : m ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) :
log b n = m ↔ b ^ m ≤ n ∧ n < b ^ (m + 1) := by
rcases em (1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) with (⟨hb, hn⟩ | hbn)
· rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← pow_le_iff_le_log, ← lt_pow_iff_log_lt, and_comm] <;>
assumption
have hm : m ≠ 0 := h.resolve_right hbn
rw [not_and_or, not_lt, Ne, not_not] at hbn
rcases hbn with (hb | rfl)
· obtain rfl | rfl := le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 hb
any_goals
simp only [ne_eq, zero_eq, reduceSucc, lt_self_iff_false, not_lt_zero, false_and, or_false]
at h
simp [h, eq_comm (a := 0), Nat.zero_pow (Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 _)] <;> omega
· simp [@eq_comm _ 0, hm]
#align nat.log_eq_iff Nat.log_eq_iff
theorem log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow {b m n : ℕ} (h₁ : b ^ m ≤ n) (h₂ : n < b ^ (m + 1)) :
log b n = m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· rw [Nat.pow_one] at h₂
exact log_of_lt h₂
· exact (log_eq_iff (Or.inl hm)).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align nat.log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow Nat.log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow
theorem log_pow {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : log b (b ^ x) = x :=
log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow le_rfl (Nat.pow_lt_pow_right hb x.lt_succ_self)
#align nat.log_pow Nat.log_pow
theorem log_eq_one_iff' {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ b ≤ n ∧ n < b * b := by
rw [log_eq_iff (Or.inl Nat.one_ne_zero), Nat.pow_add, Nat.pow_one]
#align nat.log_eq_one_iff' Nat.log_eq_one_iff'
theorem log_eq_one_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ n < b * b ∧ 1 < b ∧ b ≤ n :=
log_eq_one_iff'.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, lt_mul_self_iff.1 (h.1.trans_lt h.2), h.1⟩, fun h => ⟨h.2.2, h.1⟩⟩
#align nat.log_eq_one_iff Nat.log_eq_one_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Log.lean | 172 | 175 | theorem log_mul_base {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : log b (n * b) = log b n + 1 := by |
apply log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow <;> rw [pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm b]
exacts [Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (pow_log_le_self _ hn),
(Nat.mul_lt_mul_right (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb)).2 (lt_pow_succ_log_self hb _)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attr
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.FinsetOps
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.finset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Finite sets
Terms of type `Finset α` are one way of talking about finite subsets of `α` in mathlib.
Below, `Finset α` is defined as a structure with 2 fields:
1. `val` is a `Multiset α` of elements;
2. `nodup` is a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
Finsets in Lean are constructive in that they have an underlying `List` that enumerates their
elements. In particular, any function that uses the data of the underlying list cannot depend on its
ordering. This is handled on the `Multiset` level by multiset API, so in most cases one needn't
worry about it explicitly.
Finsets give a basic foundation for defining finite sums and products over types:
1. `∑ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`;
2. `∏ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`.
Lean refers to these operations as big operators.
More information can be found in `Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset`.
Finsets are directly used to define fintypes in Lean.
A `Fintype α` instance for a type `α` consists of a universal `Finset α` containing every term of
`α`, called `univ`. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
There is also `univ'`, the noncomputable partner to `univ`,
which is defined to be `α` as a finset if `α` is finite,
and the empty finset otherwise. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
`Finset.card`, the size of a finset is defined in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card`.
This is then used to define `Fintype.card`, the size of a type.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset`: Defines a type for the finite subsets of `α`.
Constructing a `Finset` requires two pieces of data: `val`, a `Multiset α` of elements,
and `nodup`, a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
* `Finset.instMembershipFinset`: Defines membership `a ∈ (s : Finset α)`.
* `Finset.instCoeTCFinsetSet`: Provides a coercion `s : Finset α` to `s : Set α`.
* `Finset.instCoeSortFinsetType`: Coerce `s : Finset α` to the type of all `x ∈ s`.
* `Finset.induction_on`: Induction on finsets. To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty finset, and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the finset obtained by inserting a new element.
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Finset constructions
* `Finset.instSingletonFinset`: Denoted by `{a}`; the finset consisting of one element.
* `Finset.empty`: Denoted by `∅`. The finset associated to any type consisting of no elements.
* `Finset.range`: For any `n : ℕ`, `range n` is equal to `{0, 1, ... , n - 1} ⊆ ℕ`.
This convention is consistent with other languages and normalizes `card (range n) = n`.
Beware, `n` is not in `range n`.
* `Finset.attach`: Given `s : Finset α`, `attach s` forms a finset of elements of the subtype
`{a // a ∈ s}`; in other words, it attaches elements to a proof of membership in the set.
### Finsets from functions
* `Finset.filter`: Given a decidable predicate `p : α → Prop`, `s.filter p` is
the finset consisting of those elements in `s` satisfying the predicate `p`.
### The lattice structure on subsets of finsets
There is a natural lattice structure on the subsets of a set.
In Lean, we use lattice notation to talk about things involving unions and intersections. See
`Mathlib.Order.Lattice`. For the lattice structure on finsets, `⊥` is called `bot` with `⊥ = ∅` and
`⊤` is called `top` with `⊤ = univ`.
* `Finset.instHasSubsetFinset`: Lots of API about lattices, otherwise behaves as one would expect.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: Defines `s ∪ t` (or `s ⊔ t`) as the union of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.sup`/`Finset.biUnion` for finite unions.
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: Defines `s ∩ t` (or `s ⊓ t`) as the intersection of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.inf` for finite intersections.
### Operations on two or more finsets
* `insert` and `Finset.cons`: For any `a : α`, `insert s a` returns `s ∪ {a}`. `cons s a h`
returns the same except that it requires a hypothesis stating that `a` is not already in `s`.
This does not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.erase`: For any `a : α`, `erase s a` returns `s` with the element `a` removed.
* `Finset.instSDiffFinset`: Defines the set difference `s \ t` for finsets `s` and `t`.
* `Finset.product`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of `α × β`.
For arbitrary dependent products, see `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi`.
### Predicates on finsets
* `Disjoint`: defined via the lattice structure on finsets; two sets are disjoint if their
intersection is empty.
* `Finset.Nonempty`: A finset is nonempty if it has elements. This is equivalent to saying `s ≠ ∅`.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib.Data.Equiv` files describe a general type of equivalence, so look in there for any
lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that `s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen
assert_not_exists Multiset.Powerset
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Multiset Subtype Nat Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure Finset (α : Type*) where
/-- The underlying multiset -/
val : Multiset α
/-- `val` contains no duplicates -/
nodup : Nodup val
#align finset Finset
instance Multiset.canLiftFinset {α} : CanLift (Multiset α) (Finset α) Finset.val Multiset.Nodup :=
⟨fun m hm => ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
#align multiset.can_lift_finset Multiset.canLiftFinset
namespace Finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : Finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩, ⟨t, _⟩, h => by cases h; rfl
#align finset.eq_of_veq Finset.eq_of_veq
theorem val_injective : Injective (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ => eq_of_veq
#align finset.val_injective Finset.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem val_inj {s t : Finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
val_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.val_inj Finset.val_inj
@[simp]
theorem dedup_eq_self [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : dedup s.1 = s.1 :=
s.2.dedup
#align finset.dedup_eq_self Finset.dedup_eq_self
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Finset α)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
#align finset.has_decidable_eq Finset.decidableEq
/-! ### membership -/
instance : Membership α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_def Finset.mem_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_val {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s.1 ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_val Finset.mem_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @Finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_mk Finset.mem_mk
instance decidableMem [_h : DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Multiset.decidableMem _ _
#align finset.decidable_mem Finset.decidableMem
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ a = b) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ b = a) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
/-! ### set coercion -/
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
@[coe] def toSet (s : Finset α) : Set α :=
{ a | a ∈ s }
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : CoeTC (Finset α) (Set α) :=
⟨toSet⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ (s : Set α) ↔ a ∈ (s : Finset α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_coe Finset.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem {α} {s : Finset α} : { a | a ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align finset.set_of_mem Finset.setOf_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_mem {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) : ↑x ∈ s :=
x.2
#align finset.coe_mem Finset.coe_mem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mk_coe {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) {h} : (⟨x, h⟩ : (s : Set α)) = x :=
Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align finset.mk_coe Finset.mk_coe
instance decidableMem' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ (s : Set α)) :=
s.decidableMem _
#align finset.decidable_mem' Finset.decidableMem'
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans <| s₁.nodup.ext s₂.nodup
#align finset.ext_iff Finset.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
#align finset.ext Finset.ext
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
Set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
#align finset.coe_inj Finset.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective {α} : Injective ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) := fun _s _t => coe_inj.1
#align finset.coe_injective Finset.coe_injective
/-! ### type coercion -/
/-- Coercion from a finset to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type u} : CoeSort (Finset α) (Type u) :=
⟨fun s => { x // x ∈ s }⟩
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem forall_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align finset.forall_coe Finset.forall_coe
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem exists_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align finset.exists_coe Finset.exists_coe
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift (ι : Type*) (α : ι → Type*) [_ne : ∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
(s : Finset ι) : CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α (· ∈ s)
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift' (ι α : Type*) [_ne : Nonempty α] (s : Finset ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiFinsetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift' Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift'
instance FinsetCoe.canLift (s : Finset α) : CanLift α s (↑) fun a => a ∈ s where
prf a ha := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align finset.finset_coe.can_lift Finset.FinsetCoe.canLift
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sort_coe (s : Finset α) : ((s : Set α) : Sort _) = s :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_sort_coe Finset.coe_sort_coe
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
section Subset
variable {s t : Finset α}
instance : HasSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Finset α) where
le := (· ⊆ ·)
lt := (· ⊂ ·)
le_refl s a := id
le_trans s t u hst htu a ha := htu <| hst ha
le_antisymm s t hst hts := ext fun a => ⟨@hst _, @hts _⟩
instance : IsRefl (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
theorem subset_def : s ⊆ t ↔ s.1 ⊆ t.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_def Finset.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.ssubset_def Finset.ssubset_def
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ s :=
Multiset.Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.refl Finset.Subset.refl
protected theorem Subset.rfl {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.rfl Finset.Subset.rfl
protected theorem subset_of_eq {s t : Finset α} (h : s = t) : s ⊆ t :=
h ▸ Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset_of_eq Finset.subset_of_eq
theorem Subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ :=
Multiset.Subset.trans
#align finset.subset.trans Finset.Subset.trans
theorem Superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ := fun h' h =>
Subset.trans h h'
#align finset.superset.trans Finset.Superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
Multiset.mem_of_subset
#align finset.mem_of_subset Finset.mem_of_subset
theorem not_mem_mono {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) {a : α} : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align finset.not_mem_mono Finset.not_mem_mono
theorem Subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext fun a => ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
#align finset.subset.antisymm Finset.Subset.antisymm
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_iff Finset.subset_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_subset Finset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
le_iff_subset s₁.2
#align finset.val_le_iff Finset.val_le_iff
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
#align finset.subset.antisymm_iff Finset.Subset.antisymm_iff
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∉ t := by simp only [← coe_subset, Set.not_subset, mem_coe]
#align finset.not_subset Finset.not_subset
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.le_eq_subset Finset.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_subset : ((· < ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.lt_eq_subset Finset.lt_eq_subset
theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.le_iff_subset Finset.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.lt_iff_ssubset Finset.lt_iff_ssubset
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁ by simp only [Set.ssubset_def, Finset.coe_subset]
#align finset.coe_ssubset Finset.coe_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff <| not_congr val_le_iff
#align finset.val_lt_iff Finset.val_lt_iff
lemma val_strictMono : StrictMono (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ ↦ val_lt_iff.2
theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne _ _ s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
#align finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊂ s₂) : ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align finset.exists_of_ssubset Finset.exists_of_ssubset
instance isWellFounded_ssubset : IsWellFounded (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
Subrelation.isWellFounded (InvImage _ _) val_lt_iff.2
#align finset.is_well_founded_ssubset Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Finset α) :=
Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
#align finset.is_well_founded_lt Finset.wellFoundedLT
end Subset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
/-! ### Order embedding from `Finset α` to `Set α` -/
/-- Coercion to `Set α` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α :=
⟨⟨(↑), coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
#align finset.coe_emb Finset.coeEmb
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeEmb : ⇑(coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α) = ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_coe_emb Finset.coe_coeEmb
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.Nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def Nonempty (s : Finset α) : Prop := ∃ x : α, x ∈ s
#align finset.nonempty Finset.Nonempty
-- Porting note: Much longer than in Lean3
instance decidableNonempty {s : Finset α} : Decidable s.Nonempty :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (motive := fun s : Multiset α => Decidable (∃ a, a ∈ s)) s.1
(fun l : List α =>
match l with
| [] => isFalse <| by simp
| a::l => isTrue ⟨a, by simp⟩)
#align finset.decidable_nonempty Finset.decidableNonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonempty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_nonempty Finset.coe_nonempty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : Nonempty (s : Type _) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align finset.nonempty_coe_sort Finset.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.to_set⟩ := coe_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.to_set Finset.Nonempty.to_set
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align finset.nonempty.coe_sort Finset.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem Nonempty.exists_mem {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x : α, x ∈ s :=
h
#align finset.nonempty.bex Finset.Nonempty.exists_mem
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias Nonempty.bex := Nonempty.exists_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono {s t : Finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
Set.Nonempty.mono hst hs
#align finset.nonempty.mono Finset.Nonempty.mono
theorem Nonempty.forall_const {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) {p : Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s, p) ↔ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
⟨fun h => h x hx, fun h _ _ => h⟩
#align finset.nonempty.forall_const Finset.Nonempty.forall_const
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty s :=
nonempty_coe_sort.2
#align finset.nonempty.to_subtype Finset.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _hx⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align finset.nonempty.to_type Finset.Nonempty.to_type
/-! ### empty -/
section Empty
variable {s : Finset α}
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : Finset α :=
⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
#align finset.empty Finset.empty
instance : EmptyCollection (Finset α) :=
⟨Finset.empty⟩
instance inhabitedFinset : Inhabited (Finset α) :=
⟨∅⟩
#align finset.inhabited_finset Finset.inhabitedFinset
@[simp]
theorem empty_val : (∅ : Finset α).1 = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.empty_val Finset.empty_val
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : Finset α) := by
-- Porting note: was `id`. `a ∈ List.nil` is no longer definitionally equal to `False`
simp only [mem_def, empty_val, not_mem_zero, not_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_empty Finset.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Finset α).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => not_mem_empty x hx
#align finset.not_nonempty_empty Finset.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, nodup_zero⟩ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_zero Finset.mk_zero
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ := fun e =>
not_mem_empty a <| e ▸ h
#align finset.ne_empty_of_mem Finset.ne_empty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
(Exists.elim h) fun _a => ne_empty_of_mem
#align finset.nonempty.ne_empty Finset.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
zero_subset _
#align finset.empty_subset Finset.empty_subset
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
#align finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
-- Porting note: used `id`
⟨by rintro rfl x; apply not_mem_empty, fun h => eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
#align finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero {s : Finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
@val_inj _ s ∅
#align finset.val_eq_zero Finset.val_eq_zero
theorem subset_empty {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
#align finset.subset_empty Finset.subset_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_ssubset_empty (s : Finset α) : ¬s ⊂ ∅ := fun h =>
let ⟨_, he, _⟩ := exists_of_ssubset h
-- Porting note: was `he`
not_mem_empty _ he
#align finset.not_ssubset_empty Finset.not_ssubset_empty
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.Nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
#align finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
#align finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.not.trans not_not
#align finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
by_cases Or.inl fun h => Or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h)
#align finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_empty : ((∅ : Finset α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align finset.coe_empty Finset.coe_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by rw [← coe_empty, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_empty Finset.coe_eq_empty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : IsEmpty (s : Type _) ↔ s = ∅ := by
simpa using @Set.isEmpty_coe_sort α s
#align finset.is_empty_coe_sort Finset.isEmpty_coe_sort
instance instIsEmpty : IsEmpty (∅ : Finset α) :=
isEmpty_coe_sort.2 rfl
/-- A `Finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ :=
Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
#align finset.eq_empty_of_is_empty Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance : OrderBot (Finset α) where
bot := ∅
bot_le := empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.bot_eq_empty Finset.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Finset α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align finset.empty_ssubset Finset.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align finset.nonempty.empty_ssubset Finset.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
end Empty
/-! ### singleton -/
section Singleton
variable {s : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `{a} : Finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `DecidableEq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : Singleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).1 = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_val Finset.singleton_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Finset α) ↔ b = a :=
Multiset.mem_singleton
#align finset.mem_singleton Finset.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Finset α)) : x = y :=
mem_singleton.1 h
#align finset.eq_of_mem_singleton Finset.eq_of_mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : Finset α) ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr mem_singleton
#align finset.not_mem_singleton Finset.not_mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Finset α) :=
-- Porting note: was `Or.inl rfl`
mem_singleton.mpr rfl
#align finset.mem_singleton_self Finset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Finset α} : s.val = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← val_inj]
rfl
#align finset.val_eq_singleton_iff Finset.val_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Finset α) := fun _a _b h =>
mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _)
#align finset.singleton_injective Finset.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj : ({a} : Finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.singleton_inj Finset.singleton_inj
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
#align finset.singleton_nonempty Finset.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
#align finset.singleton_ne_empty Finset.singleton_ne_empty
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Finset α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align finset.empty_ssubset_singleton Finset.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : (({a} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_singleton Finset.coe_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (s : Set α) = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_singleton Finset.coe_eq_singleton
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_subset_singleton : (s : Set α) ⊆ {a} ↔ s ⊆ {a} := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
@[norm_cast]
lemma singleton_subset_coe : {a} ⊆ (s : Set α) ↔ {a} ⊆ s := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor <;> intro t
· rw [t]
exact ⟨Finset.mem_singleton_self _, fun _ => Finset.mem_singleton.1⟩
· ext
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨t.right _, fun r => r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· rintro ⟨hne, h_uniq⟩
rw [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem]
refine ⟨?_, h_uniq⟩
rw [← h_uniq hne.choose hne.choose_spec]
exact hne.choose_spec
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
theorem nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default [Unique α] {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty ↔ s = {default} := by
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default Finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
alias ⟨Nonempty.eq_singleton_default, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
#align finset.nonempty.eq_singleton_default Finset.Nonempty.eq_singleton_default
theorem singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : Finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s := by
simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, ExistsUnique]
#align finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem singleton_subset_set_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : ↑({a} : Finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [coe_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
#align finset.singleton_subset_set_iff Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
#align finset.singleton_subset_iff Finset.singleton_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton, Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq, coe_eq_empty, coe_eq_singleton]
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff Finset.subset_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Finset α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align finset.singleton_subset_singleton Finset.singleton_subset_singleton
protected theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align finset.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => mem_singleton
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff' Finset.subset_singleton_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_singleton, Set.ssubset_singleton_iff, coe_eq_empty]
#align finset.ssubset_singleton_iff Finset.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
/-- A finset is nontrivial if it has at least two elements. -/
protected abbrev Nontrivial (s : Finset α) : Prop := (s : Set α).Nontrivial
#align finset.nontrivial Finset.Nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_empty : ¬ (∅ : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_empty Finset.not_nontrivial_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_singleton : ¬ ({a} : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_singleton Finset.not_nontrivial_singleton
theorem Nontrivial.ne_singleton (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ {a} := by
rintro rfl; exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs
#align finset.nontrivial.ne_singleton Finset.Nontrivial.ne_singleton
nonrec lemma Nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.Nontrivial) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := hs.exists_ne _
theorem eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton]; exact Set.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha
#align finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨Nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
#align finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton Finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton
theorem Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.Nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.Nontrivial :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left <| Exists.intro a
#align finset.nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
instance instNontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Finset α) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨⟨{a}, ∅, singleton_ne_empty _⟩⟩
#align finset.nontrivial' Finset.instNontrivial
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Finset α) where
default := ∅
uniq _ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
instance (i : α) : Unique ({i} : Finset α) where
default := ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩
uniq j := Subtype.ext <| mem_singleton.mp j.2
@[simp]
lemma default_singleton (i : α) : ((default : ({i} : Finset α)) : α) = i := rfl
end Singleton
/-! ### cons -/
section Cons
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `DecidableEq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : Finset α :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
#align finset.cons Finset.cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {h} : b ∈ s.cons a h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons
#align finset.mem_cons Finset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Finset α} {hb : b ∉ s} (ha : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s hb :=
Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem ha
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) {h} : a ∈ cons a s h :=
Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _
#align finset.mem_cons_self Finset.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.cons_val Finset.cons_val
theorem forall_mem_cons (h : a ∉ s) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.forall_mem_cons Finset.forall_mem_cons
/-- Useful in proofs by induction. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_cons {p : α → Prop} {h : a ∉ s} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) (x)
(h : x ∈ s) : p x :=
H _ <| mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.forall_of_forall_cons Finset.forall_of_forall_cons
@[simp]
theorem mk_cons {s : Multiset α} (h : (a ::ₘ s).Nodup) :
(⟨a ::ₘ s, h⟩ : Finset α) = cons a ⟨s, (nodup_cons.1 h).2⟩ (nodup_cons.1 h).1 :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_cons Finset.mk_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_empty (a : α) : cons a ∅ (not_mem_empty _) = {a} := rfl
#align finset.cons_empty Finset.cons_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_cons.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩
#align finset.nonempty_cons Finset.nonempty_cons
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk {m : Multiset α} {hm} : (⟨m, hm⟩ : Finset α).Nonempty ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
induction m using Multiset.induction_on <;> simp
#align finset.nonempty_mk Finset.nonempty_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_cons {a s h} : (@cons α a s h : Set α) = insert a (s : Set α) := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_cons Finset.coe_cons
theorem subset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.subset_cons _ _
#align finset.subset_cons Finset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.ssubset_cons h
#align finset.ssubset_cons Finset.ssubset_cons
theorem cons_subset {h : a ∉ s} : s.cons a h ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
Multiset.cons_subset
#align finset.cons_subset Finset.cons_subset
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset_cons {hs ht} : s.cons a hs ⊆ t.cons a ht ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rwa [← coe_subset, coe_cons, coe_cons, Set.insert_subset_insert_iff, coe_subset]
#align finset.cons_subset_cons Finset.cons_subset_cons
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∉ s), s.cons a h ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset (ssubset_cons _) h⟩
obtain ⟨a, hs, ht⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, cons_subset.2 ⟨hs, h.subset⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset
end Cons
/-! ### disjoint -/
section Disjoint
variable {f : α → β} {s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
⟨fun h a hs ht => not_mem_empty a <|
singleton_subset_iff.mp (h (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hs) (singleton_subset_iff.mpr ht)),
fun h _ hs ht _ ha => (h (hs ha) (ht ha)).elim⟩
#align finset.disjoint_left Finset.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by
rw [_root_.disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align finset.disjoint_right Finset.disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b := by
simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
#align finset.disjoint_iff_ne Finset.disjoint_iff_ne
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_val : s.1.Disjoint t.1 ↔ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.disjoint_val Finset.disjoint_val
theorem _root_.Disjoint.forall_ne_finset (h : Disjoint s t) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : a ≠ b :=
disjoint_iff_ne.1 h _ ha _ hb
#align disjoint.forall_ne_finset Disjoint.forall_ne_finset
theorem not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
disjoint_left.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => by
rw [Classical.not_imp, not_not]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff Finset.not_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_left.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_left Finset.disjoint_of_subset_left
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_right.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_right.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_right Finset.disjoint_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_left (s : Finset α) : Disjoint ∅ s :=
disjoint_bot_left
#align finset.disjoint_empty_left Finset.disjoint_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_right (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s ∅ :=
disjoint_bot_right
#align finset.disjoint_empty_right Finset.disjoint_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint (singleton a) s ↔ a ∉ s := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_left Finset.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s (singleton a) ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_right Finset.disjoint_singleton_right
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Finset α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
rw [disjoint_singleton_left, mem_singleton]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton Finset.disjoint_singleton
theorem disjoint_self_iff_empty (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s s ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_self
#align finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty Finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem disjoint_coe : Disjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [Finset.disjoint_left, Set.disjoint_left, mem_coe]
#align finset.disjoint_coe Finset.disjoint_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_coe {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint (fun i => f i : ι → Set α) ↔ s.PairwiseDisjoint f :=
forall₅_congr fun _ _ _ _ _ => disjoint_coe
#align finset.pairwise_disjoint_coe Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_coe
end Disjoint
/-! ### disjoint union -/
/-- `disjUnion s t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`.
It is the same as `s ∪ t`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The hypothesis
ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) : Finset α :=
⟨s.1 + t.1, Multiset.nodup_add.2 ⟨s.2, t.2, disjoint_val.2 h⟩⟩
#align finset.disj_union Finset.disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjUnion {α s t h a} : a ∈ @disjUnion α s t h ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; rcases t with ⟨⟨t⟩⟩; apply List.mem_append
#align finset.mem_disj_union Finset.mem_disjUnion
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_disjUnion {s t : Finset α} (h : Disjoint s t) :
(disjUnion s t h : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem disjUnion_comm (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
disjUnion s t h = disjUnion t s h.symm :=
eq_of_veq <| add_comm _ _
#align finset.disj_union_comm Finset.disjUnion_comm
@[simp]
theorem empty_disjUnion (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint ∅ t := disjoint_bot_left) :
disjUnion ∅ t h = t :=
eq_of_veq <| zero_add _
#align finset.empty_disj_union Finset.empty_disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_empty (s : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right) :
disjUnion s ∅ h = s :=
eq_of_veq <| add_zero _
#align finset.disj_union_empty Finset.disjUnion_empty
theorem singleton_disjUnion (a : α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint {a} t) :
disjUnion {a} t h = cons a t (disjoint_singleton_left.mp h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_add _ _
#align finset.singleton_disj_union Finset.singleton_disjUnion
theorem disjUnion_singleton (s : Finset α) (a : α) (h : Disjoint s {a}) :
disjUnion s {a} h = cons a s (disjoint_singleton_right.mp h) := by
rw [disjUnion_comm, singleton_disjUnion]
#align finset.disj_union_singleton Finset.disjUnion_singleton
/-! ### insert -/
section Insert
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `insert a s` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. -/
instance : Insert α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩⟩
theorem insert_def (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩ :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_def Finset.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem insert_val (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = ndinsert a s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_val Finset.insert_val
theorem insert_val' (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = dedup (a ::ₘ s.1) := by
rw [dedup_cons, dedup_eq_self]; rfl
#align finset.insert_val' Finset.insert_val'
theorem insert_val_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 := by
rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.insert_val_of_not_mem Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert : a ∈ insert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
mem_ndinsert
#align finset.mem_insert Finset.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) : a ∈ insert a s :=
mem_ndinsert_self a s.1
#align finset.mem_insert_self Finset.mem_insert_self
theorem mem_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ insert b s :=
mem_ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.mem_insert_of_mem Finset.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (h : b ∈ insert a s) : b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
(mem_insert.1 h).resolve_left
#align finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (ha : b ∈ insert a s) (hb : b ∉ s) : b = a :=
(mem_insert.1 ha).resolve_right hb
#align finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
/-- A version of `LawfulSingleton.insert_emptyc_eq` that works with `dsimp`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF] lemma insert_empty : insert a (∅ : Finset α) = {a} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_eq_insert (a s h) : @cons α a s h = insert a s :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.cons_eq_insert Finset.cons_eq_insert
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : ↑(insert a s) = (insert a s : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_coe, mem_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff]
#align finset.coe_insert Finset.coe_insert
theorem mem_insert_coe {s : Finset α} {x y : α} : x ∈ insert y s ↔ x ∈ insert y (s : Set α) := by
simp
#align finset.mem_insert_coe Finset.mem_insert_coe
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => by ext; simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
eq_of_veq <| ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.insert_eq_of_mem Finset.insert_eq_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert_self _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align finset.insert_eq_self Finset.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align finset.insert_ne_self Finset.insert_ne_self
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : Finset α) = {a} :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_singleton_self _
#align finset.pair_eq_singleton Finset.pair_eq_singleton
theorem Insert.comm (a b : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, or_left_comm]
#align finset.insert.comm Finset.Insert.comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pair {a b : α} : (({a, b} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a, b} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_pair Finset.coe_pair
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_pair {s : Finset α} {a b : α} : (s : Set α) = {a, b} ↔ s = {a, b} := by
rw [← coe_pair, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_pair Finset.coe_eq_pair
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Finset α) = {b, a} :=
Insert.comm a b ∅
#align finset.pair_comm Finset.pair_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, ← or_assoc, or_self_iff]
#align finset.insert_idem Finset.insert_idem
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩
#align finset.insert_nonempty Finset.insert_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
(insert_nonempty a s).ne_empty
#align finset.insert_ne_empty Finset.insert_ne_empty
-- Porting note: explicit universe annotation is no longer required.
instance (i : α) (s : Finset α) : Nonempty ((insert i s : Finset α) : Set α) :=
(Finset.coe_nonempty.mpr (s.insert_nonempty i)).to_subtype
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem (s t : Finset α) {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ≠ insert a t := by
contrapose! h
simp [h]
#align finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem Finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, forall_eq, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.insert_subset Finset.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha,hs⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a s := fun _b => mem_insert_of_mem
#align finset.subset_insert Finset.subset_insert
@[gcongr]
theorem insert_subset_insert (a : α) {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
insert_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, Subset.trans h (subset_insert _ _)⟩
#align finset.insert_subset_insert Finset.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] lemma insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp_rw [← coe_subset]; simp [-coe_subset, ha]
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert_self _ _) ha, congr_arg (insert · s)⟩
#align finset.insert_inj Finset.insert_inj
theorem insert_inj_on (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn (fun a => insert a s) sᶜ := fun _ h _ _ =>
(insert_inj h).1
#align finset.insert_inj_on Finset.insert_inj_on
theorem ssubset_iff : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := mod_cast @Set.ssubset_iff_insert α s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff Finset.ssubset_iff
theorem ssubset_insert (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff.mpr ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align finset.ssubset_insert Finset.ssubset_insert
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (empty : p ∅)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : ∀ s, p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ => by
induction s using Multiset.induction with
| empty => exact empty
| cons a s IH =>
rw [mk_cons nd]
exact cons a _ _ (IH _)
#align finset.cons_induction Finset.cons_induction
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : p s :=
cons_induction h₁ h₂ s
#align finset.cons_induction_on Finset.cons_induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (empty : p ∅)
(insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : ∀ s, p s :=
cons_induction empty fun a s ha => (s.cons_eq_insert a ha).symm ▸ insert ha
#align finset.induction Finset.induction
/-- To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α)
(empty : p ∅) (insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
Finset.induction empty insert s
#align finset.induction_on Finset.induction_on
/-- To prove a proposition about `S : Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α ⊆ S`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element of `S`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (S : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Finset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) _ S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ has hqs hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 hs
h₂ hS sS has (hqs sS))
(Finset.Subset.refl S)
#align finset.induction_on' Finset.induction_on'
/-- To prove a proposition about a nonempty `s : Finset α`, it suffices to show it holds for all
singletons and that if it holds for nonempty `t : Finset α`, then it also holds for the `Finset`
obtained by inserting an element in `t`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Nonempty.cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : ∀ s : Finset α, s.Nonempty → Prop}
(singleton : ∀ a, p {a} (singleton_nonempty _))
(cons : ∀ a s (h : a ∉ s) (hs), p s hs → p (Finset.cons a s h) (nonempty_cons h))
{s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : p s hs := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => exact (not_nonempty_empty hs).elim
| cons a t ha h =>
obtain rfl | ht := t.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact singleton a
· exact cons a t ha ht (h ht)
#align finset.nonempty.cons_induction Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction
lemma Nonempty.exists_cons_eq (hs : s.Nonempty) : ∃ t a ha, cons a t ha = s :=
hs.cons_induction (fun a ↦ ⟨∅, a, _, cons_empty _⟩) fun _ _ _ _ _ ↦ ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩
/-- Inserting an element to a finite set is equivalent to the option type. -/
def subtypeInsertEquivOption {t : Finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
{ i // i ∈ insert x t } ≃ Option { i // i ∈ t } where
toFun y := if h : ↑y = x then none else some ⟨y, (mem_insert.mp y.2).resolve_left h⟩
invFun y := (y.elim ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ _⟩) fun z => ⟨z, mem_insert_of_mem z.2⟩
left_inv y := by
by_cases h : ↑y = x
· simp only [Subtype.ext_iff, h, Option.elim, dif_pos, Subtype.coe_mk]
· simp only [h, Option.elim, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_eta, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv := by
rintro (_ | y)
· simp only [Option.elim, dif_pos]
· have : ↑y ≠ x := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact h y.2
simp only [this, Option.elim, Subtype.eta, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align finset.subtype_insert_equiv_option Finset.subtypeInsertEquivOption
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_left : Disjoint (insert a s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_insert, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_left Finset.disjoint_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_right : Disjoint s (insert a t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_insert_left, _root_.disjoint_comm]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_right Finset.disjoint_insert_right
end Insert
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s ∪ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∪ t` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Union (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, t.2.ndunion s.1⟩⟩
/-- `s ∩ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∩ t` iff `a ∈ s` and `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Inter (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, s.2.ndinter t.1⟩⟩
instance : Lattice (Finset α) :=
{ Finset.partialOrder with
sup := (· ∪ ·)
sup_le := fun _ _ _ hs ht _ ha => (mem_ndunion.1 ha).elim (fun h => hs h) fun h => ht h
le_sup_left := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inl h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inr h
inf := (· ∩ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ht hu _ h => mem_ndinter.2 ⟨ht h, hu h⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).1
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).2 }
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : (Sup.sup : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Union.union :=
rfl
#align finset.sup_eq_union Finset.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : (Inf.inf : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Inter.inter :=
rfl
#align finset.inf_eq_inter Finset.inf_eq_inter
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
instance decidableDisjoint (U V : Finset α) : Decidable (Disjoint U V) :=
decidable_of_iff _ disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.decidable_disjoint Finset.decidableDisjoint
/-! #### union -/
theorem union_val_nd (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = ndunion s.1 t.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.union_val_nd Finset.union_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem union_val (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = s.1 ∪ t.1 :=
ndunion_eq_union s.2
#align finset.union_val Finset.union_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
mem_ndunion
#align finset.mem_union Finset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.disj_union_eq_union Finset.disjUnion_eq_union
theorem mem_union_left (t : Finset α) (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inl h
#align finset.mem_union_left Finset.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right (s : Finset α) (h : a ∈ t) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.mem_union_right Finset.mem_union_right
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s ∪ t, p a) ↔ (∀ a ∈ s, p a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ t, p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a => h a ∘ mem_union_left _, fun b => h b ∘ mem_union_right _⟩,
fun h _ab hab => (mem_union.mp hab).elim (h.1 _) (h.2 _)⟩
#align finset.forall_mem_union Finset.forall_mem_union
theorem not_mem_union : a ∉ s ∪ t ↔ a ∉ s ∧ a ∉ t := by rw [mem_union, not_or]
#align finset.not_mem_union Finset.not_mem_union
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∪ s₂) = (s₁ ∪ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_union
#align finset.coe_union Finset.coe_union
theorem union_subset (hs : s ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u → s ∪ t ⊆ u :=
sup_le <| le_iff_subset.2 hs
#align finset.union_subset Finset.union_subset
theorem subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_left _
#align finset.subset_union_left Finset.subset_union_left
theorem subset_union_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₂ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_right _
#align finset.subset_union_right Finset.subset_union_right
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union (hsu : s ⊆ u) (htv : t ⊆ v) : s ∪ t ⊆ u ∪ v :=
sup_le_sup (le_iff_subset.2 hsu) htv
#align finset.union_subset_union Finset.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align finset.union_subset_union_left Finset.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align finset.union_subset_union_right Finset.union_subset_union_right
theorem union_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ = s₂ ∪ s₁ := sup_comm _ _
#align finset.union_comm Finset.union_comm
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) := sup_assoc _ _ _
#align finset.union_assoc Finset.union_assoc
instance : Std.Associative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_idempotent (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s := sup_idem _
#align finset.union_idempotent Finset.union_idempotent
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_idempotent⟩
theorem union_subset_left (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u :=
subset_union_left.trans h
#align finset.union_subset_left Finset.union_subset_left
theorem union_subset_right {s t u : Finset α} (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u :=
Subset.trans subset_union_right h
#align finset.union_subset_right Finset.union_subset_right
theorem union_left_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_union, or_left_comm]
#align finset.union_left_comm Finset.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ t :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc, @or_comm (x ∈ t)]
#align finset.union_right_comm Finset.union_right_comm
theorem union_self (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s :=
union_idempotent s
#align finset.union_self Finset.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∪ ∅ = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.union_empty Finset.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∪ s = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_union Finset.empty_union
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inl {s t : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_left
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inr {s t : Finset α} (h : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_right
theorem insert_eq (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = {a} ∪ s :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_eq Finset.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem insert_union (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_assoc]
#align finset.insert_union Finset.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_left_comm]
#align finset.union_insert Finset.union_insert
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Finset α) :
insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t := by
simp only [insert_union, union_insert, insert_idem]
#align finset.insert_union_distrib Finset.insert_union_distrib
@[simp] lemma union_eq_left : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s := sup_eq_left
#align finset.union_eq_left_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_left
@[simp] lemma left_eq_union : s = s ∪ t ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_left]
#align finset.left_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.left_eq_union
@[simp] lemma union_eq_right : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t := sup_eq_right
#align finset.union_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_right
@[simp] lemma right_eq_union : s = t ∪ s ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_right]
#align finset.right_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.right_eq_union
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.union_congr_left Finset.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.union_congr_right Finset.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_left Finset.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_right Finset.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_left Finset.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_right Finset.disjoint_union_right
/-- To prove a relation on pairs of `Finset X`, it suffices to show that it is
* symmetric,
* it holds when one of the `Finset`s is empty,
* it holds for pairs of singletons,
* if it holds for `[a, c]` and for `[b, c]`, then it holds for `[a ∪ b, c]`.
-/
theorem induction_on_union (P : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) (symm : ∀ {a b}, P a b → P b a)
(empty_right : ∀ {a}, P a ∅) (singletons : ∀ {a b}, P {a} {b})
(union_of : ∀ {a b c}, P a c → P b c → P (a ∪ b) c) : ∀ a b, P a b := by
intro a b
refine Finset.induction_on b empty_right fun x s _xs hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
apply union_of _ (symm hi)
refine Finset.induction_on a empty_right fun a t _ta hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
exact union_of singletons (symm hi)
#align finset.induction_on_union Finset.induction_on_union
/-! #### inter -/
theorem inter_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = ndinter s₁.1 s₂.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.inter_val_nd Finset.inter_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem inter_val (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∩ s₂.1 :=
ndinter_eq_inter s₁.2
#align finset.inter_val Finset.inter_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ :=
mem_ndinter
#align finset.mem_inter Finset.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).1
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₂ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).2
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem mem_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
and_imp.1 mem_inter.2
#align finset.mem_inter_of_mem Finset.mem_inter_of_mem
theorem inter_subset_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₁ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_left
#align finset.inter_subset_left Finset.inter_subset_left
theorem inter_subset_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₂ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_right
#align finset.inter_subset_right Finset.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s₁ s₂ u : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊆ u → s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∩ u := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [subset_iff, mem_inter]
#align finset.subset_inter Finset.subset_inter
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∩ s₂) = (s₁ ∩ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_inter
#align finset.coe_inter Finset.coe_inter
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_left]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_left Finset.union_inter_cancel_left
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_right Finset.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₂ ∩ s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_comm]
#align finset.inter_comm Finset.inter_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_assoc]
#align finset.inter_assoc Finset.inter_assoc
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_left_comm]
#align finset.inter_left_comm Finset.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_right_comm]
#align finset.inter_right_comm Finset.inter_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (s : Finset α) : s ∩ s = s :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| and_self_iff
#align finset.inter_self Finset.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.inter_empty Finset.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∩ s = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_inter Finset.empty_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_self (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ s) = s := by
rw [inter_comm, union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.inter_union_self Finset.inter_union_self
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x = a ∨ x ∈ s₂ ↔ x ∈ s₂ := or_iff_right_of_imp <| by rintro rfl; exact h
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_left, this]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun x => by
have : ¬(x = a ∧ x ∈ s₂) := by rintro ⟨rfl, H⟩; exact h H
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_right, this, false_or_iff]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_not_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∈ s) : {a} ∩ s = {a} :=
show insert a ∅ ∩ s = insert a ∅ by rw [insert_inter_of_mem H, empty_inter]
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∉ s) : {a} ∩ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem <| by
simp only [mem_inter, mem_singleton]; rintro x ⟨rfl, h⟩; exact H h
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ {a} = {a} := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ {a} = ∅ := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_not_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_not_mem
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {x y s t : Finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) (h' : s ⊆ t) : x ∩ s ⊆ y ∩ t := by
intro a a_in
rw [Finset.mem_inter] at a_in ⊢
exact ⟨h a_in.1, h' a_in.2⟩
#align finset.inter_subset_inter Finset.inter_subset_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left (h : t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t ⊆ s ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl h
#align finset.inter_subset_inter_left Finset.inter_subset_inter_left
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter h Subset.rfl
#align finset.inter_subset_inter_right Finset.inter_subset_inter_right
theorem inter_subset_union : s ∩ t ⊆ s ∪ t :=
le_iff_subset.1 inf_le_sup
#align finset.inter_subset_union Finset.inter_subset_union
instance : DistribLattice (Finset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := fun a b c => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only
[sup_eq_union, inf_eq_inter, le_eq_subset, subset_iff, mem_inter, mem_union, and_imp,
or_imp, true_or_iff, imp_true_iff, true_and_iff, or_true_iff] }
@[simp]
theorem union_left_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ (s ∪ t) = s ∪ t := sup_left_idem _ _
#align finset.union_left_idem Finset.union_left_idem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem union_right_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ t = s ∪ t := sup_right_idem _ _
#align finset.union_right_idem Finset.union_right_idem
@[simp]
theorem inter_left_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (s ∩ t) = s ∩ t := inf_left_idem _ _
#align finset.inter_left_idem Finset.inter_left_idem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem inter_right_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ t = s ∩ t := inf_right_idem _ _
#align finset.inter_right_idem Finset.inter_right_idem
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align finset.inter_distrib_left Finset.inter_union_distrib_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align finset.inter_distrib_right Finset.union_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align finset.union_distrib_left Finset.union_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align finset.union_distrib_right Finset.inter_union_distrib_right
-- 2024-03-22
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_left := inter_union_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_right := union_inter_distrib_right
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_left := union_inter_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_right := inter_union_distrib_right
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_distrib_left Finset.union_union_distrib_left
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_distrib_right Finset.union_union_distrib_right
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_distrib_left Finset.inter_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_distrib_right Finset.inter_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_union_comm Finset.union_union_union_comm
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_inter_comm Finset.inter_inter_inter_comm
lemma union_eq_empty : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := sup_eq_bot_iff
#align finset.union_eq_empty_iff Finset.union_eq_empty
theorem union_subset_iff : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(sup_le_iff : s ⊔ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u)
#align finset.union_subset_iff Finset.union_subset_iff
theorem subset_inter_iff : s ⊆ t ∩ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ⊆ u :=
(le_inf_iff : s ≤ t ⊓ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u)
#align finset.subset_inter_iff Finset.subset_inter_iff
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
#align finset.inter_eq_left_iff_subset_iff_subset Finset.inter_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : t ∩ s = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_right
#align finset.inter_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.inter_eq_right
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.inter_congr_left Finset.inter_congr_left
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.inter_congr_right Finset.inter_congr_right
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
#align finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_left Finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
#align finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_right Finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_right
theorem ite_subset_union (s s' : Finset α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : ite P s s' ⊆ s ∪ s' :=
ite_le_sup s s' P
#align finset.ite_subset_union Finset.ite_subset_union
theorem inter_subset_ite (s s' : Finset α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : s ∩ s' ⊆ ite P s s' :=
inf_le_ite s s' P
#align finset.inter_subset_ite Finset.inter_subset_ite
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter Finset.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
#align finset.nonempty.not_disjoint Finset.Nonempty.not_disjoint
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
#align finset.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter Finset.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `erase s a` is the set `s - {a}`, that is, the elements of `s` which are
not equal to `a`. -/
def erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : Finset α :=
⟨_, s.2.erase a⟩
#align finset.erase Finset.erase
@[simp]
theorem erase_val (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (erase s a).1 = s.1.erase a :=
rfl
#align finset.erase_val Finset.erase_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_erase {a b : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ erase s b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ s :=
s.2.mem_erase_iff
#align finset.mem_erase Finset.mem_erase
theorem not_mem_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : a ∉ erase s a :=
s.2.not_mem_erase
#align finset.not_mem_erase Finset.not_mem_erase
-- While this can be solved by `simp`, this lemma is eligible for `dsimp`
@[nolint simpNF, simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.erase_empty Finset.erase_empty
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp $ by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
#align finset.erase_singleton Finset.erase_singleton
theorem ne_of_mem_erase : b ∈ erase s a → b ≠ a := fun h => (mem_erase.1 h).1
#align finset.ne_of_mem_erase Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
theorem mem_of_mem_erase : b ∈ erase s a → b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_of_mem_erase
#align finset.mem_of_mem_erase Finset.mem_of_mem_erase
theorem mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem : a ≠ b → a ∈ s → a ∈ erase s b := by
simp only [mem_erase]; exact And.intro
#align finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem
/-- An element of `s` that is not an element of `erase s a` must be`a`. -/
theorem eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase (hs : b ∈ s) (hsa : b ∉ s.erase a) : b = a := by
rw [mem_erase, not_and] at hsa
exact not_imp_not.mp hsa hs
#align finset.eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase Finset.eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase
@[simp]
theorem erase_eq_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase s a = s :=
eq_of_veq <| erase_of_not_mem h
#align finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem erase_eq_self : s.erase a = s ↔ a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ not_mem_erase _ _, erase_eq_of_not_mem⟩
#align finset.erase_eq_self Finset.erase_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or_iff, iff_self_iff, imp_true_iff]
#align finset.erase_insert_eq_erase Finset.erase_insert_eq_erase
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.erase_insert Finset.erase_insert
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
#align finset.erase_insert_of_ne Finset.erase_insert_of_ne
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
#align finset.erase_cons_of_ne Finset.erase_cons_of_ne
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and_iff]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
#align finset.insert_erase Finset.insert_erase
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_subset_erase (a : α) {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : erase s a ⊆ erase t a :=
val_le_iff.1 <| erase_le_erase _ <| val_le_iff.2 h
#align finset.erase_subset_erase Finset.erase_subset_erase
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase s a ⊆ s :=
Multiset.erase_subset _ _
#align finset.erase_subset Finset.erase_subset
theorem subset_erase {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ t.erase a ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.trans (erase_subset _ _), fun ha => not_mem_erase _ _ (h ha)⟩,
fun h _b hb => mem_erase.2 ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb h.2, h.1 hb⟩⟩
#align finset.subset_erase Finset.subset_erase
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : ↑(erase s a) = (s \ {a} : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_erase.trans <| by rw [and_comm, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, mem_coe]
#align finset.coe_erase Finset.coe_erase
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
#align finset.erase_ssubset Finset.erase_ssubset
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
#align finset.erase_ssubset_insert Finset.erase_ssubset_insert
theorem erase_ne_self : s.erase a ≠ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
erase_eq_self.not_left
#align finset.erase_ne_self Finset.erase_ne_self
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.erase_cons Finset.erase_cons
theorem erase_idem {a : α} {s : Finset α} : erase (erase s a) a = erase s a := by simp
#align finset.erase_idem Finset.erase_idem
theorem erase_right_comm {a b : α} {s : Finset α} : erase (erase s a) b = erase (erase s b) a := by
ext x
simp only [mem_erase, ← and_assoc]
rw [@and_comm (x ≠ a)]
#align finset.erase_right_comm Finset.erase_right_comm
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
#align finset.subset_insert_iff Finset.subset_insert_iff
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
#align finset.erase_insert_subset Finset.erase_insert_subset
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
#align finset.insert_erase_subset Finset.insert_erase_subset
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem Finset.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align finset.erase_subset_iff_of_mem Finset.erase_subset_iff_of_mem
theorem erase_inj {x y : α} (s : Finset α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.erase x = s.erase y ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase hx ?_, congr_arg _⟩
rw [← h]
simp
#align finset.erase_inj Finset.erase_inj
theorem erase_injOn (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn s.erase s := fun _ _ _ _ => (erase_inj s ‹_›).mp
#align finset.erase_inj_on Finset.erase_injOn
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
#align finset.erase_inj_on' Finset.erase_injOn'
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s \ t` is the set consisting of the elements of `s` that are not in `t`. -/
instance : SDiff (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s₁ s₂ => ⟨s₁.1 - s₂.1, nodup_of_le tsub_le_self s₁.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_val (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ \ s₂).val = s₁.val - s₂.val :=
rfl
#align finset.sdiff_val Finset.sdiff_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_sdiff : a ∈ s \ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t :=
mem_sub_of_nodup s.2
#align finset.mem_sdiff Finset.mem_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inter_sdiff_self (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ \ s₁) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem <| by
simp only [mem_inter, mem_sdiff]; rintro x ⟨h, _, hn⟩; exact hn h
#align finset.inter_sdiff_self Finset.inter_sdiff_self
instance : GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (Finset α) :=
{ sup_inf_sdiff := fun x y => by
simp only [ext_iff, mem_union, mem_sdiff, inf_eq_inter, sup_eq_union, mem_inter,
← and_or_left, em, and_true, implies_true]
inf_inf_sdiff := fun x y => by
simp only [ext_iff, inter_sdiff_self, inter_empty, inter_assoc, false_iff_iff, inf_eq_inter,
not_mem_empty, bot_eq_empty, not_false_iff, implies_true] }
theorem not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right (h : a ∈ t) : a ∉ s \ t := by
simp only [mem_sdiff, h, not_true, not_false_iff, and_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right Finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right
theorem not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left (h : a ∉ s) : a ∉ s \ t := by simp [h]
#align finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left Finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left
theorem union_sdiff_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
#align finset.union_sdiff_of_subset Finset.union_sdiff_of_subset
theorem sdiff_union_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂ \ s₁ ∪ s₁ = s₂ :=
(union_comm _ _).trans (union_sdiff_of_subset h)
#align finset.sdiff_union_of_subset Finset.sdiff_union_of_subset
lemma inter_sdiff_assoc (s t u : Finset α) : (s ∩ t) \ u = s ∩ (t \ u) := by
ext x; simp [and_assoc]
@[deprecated inter_sdiff_assoc (since := "2024-05-01")]
theorem inter_sdiff (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ u := (inter_sdiff_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align finset.inter_sdiff Finset.inter_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₂ \ s₁ ∩ s₁ = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self Finset.sdiff_inter_self
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem sdiff_self (s₁ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₁ = ∅ :=
_root_.sdiff_self
#align finset.sdiff_self Finset.sdiff_self
theorem sdiff_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
#align finset.sdiff_inter_distrib_right Finset.sdiff_inter_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self_left (s t : Finset α) : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self_left Finset.sdiff_inter_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self_right (s t : Finset α) : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self_right Finset.sdiff_inter_self_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_empty : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
#align finset.sdiff_empty Finset.sdiff_empty
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem sdiff_subset_sdiff (hst : s ⊆ t) (hvu : v ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ t \ v :=
sdiff_le_sdiff hst hvu
#align finset.sdiff_subset_sdiff Finset.sdiff_subset_sdiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sdiff (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ \ s₂) = (s₁ \ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_sdiff
#align finset.coe_sdiff Finset.coe_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem union_sdiff_self_eq_union : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self_right _ _
#align finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union Finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_union_self_eq_union : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self_left _ _
#align finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union Finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union
theorem union_sdiff_left (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_left Finset.union_sdiff_left
theorem union_sdiff_right (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_right Finset.union_sdiff_right
theorem union_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
h.sup_sdiff_cancel_left
#align finset.union_sdiff_cancel_left Finset.union_sdiff_cancel_left
theorem union_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
h.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
#align finset.union_sdiff_cancel_right Finset.union_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem union_sdiff_symm : s ∪ t \ s = t ∪ s \ t := by simp [union_comm]
#align finset.union_sdiff_symm Finset.union_sdiff_symm
theorem sdiff_union_inter (s t : Finset α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s :=
sup_sdiff_inf _ _
#align finset.sdiff_union_inter Finset.sdiff_union_inter
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem sdiff_idem (s t : Finset α) : (s \ t) \ t = s \ t :=
_root_.sdiff_idem
#align finset.sdiff_idem Finset.sdiff_idem
theorem subset_sdiff : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ Disjoint s u :=
le_iff_subset.symm.trans le_sdiff
#align finset.subset_sdiff Finset.subset_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
#align finset.sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset Finset.sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset
theorem sdiff_nonempty : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset.not
#align finset.sdiff_nonempty Finset.sdiff_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem empty_sdiff (s : Finset α) : ∅ \ s = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
#align finset.empty_sdiff Finset.empty_sdiff
theorem insert_sdiff_of_not_mem (s : Finset α) {t : Finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
insert x s \ t = insert x (s \ t) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert]
exact Set.insert_diff_of_not_mem _ h
#align finset.insert_sdiff_of_not_mem Finset.insert_sdiff_of_not_mem
theorem insert_sdiff_of_mem (s : Finset α) {x : α} (h : x ∈ t) : insert x s \ t = s \ t := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert]
exact Set.insert_diff_of_mem _ h
#align finset.insert_sdiff_of_mem Finset.insert_sdiff_of_mem
@[simp] lemma insert_sdiff_cancel (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ s = {a} := by
rw [insert_sdiff_of_not_mem _ ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_emptyc_eq]
@[simp]
theorem insert_sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : insert x s \ insert x t = s \ insert x t :=
insert_sdiff_of_mem _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
#align finset.insert_sdiff_insert Finset.insert_sdiff_insert
lemma insert_sdiff_insert' (hab : a ≠ b) (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ insert b s = {a} := by
ext; aesop
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
lemma cons_sdiff_cons (hab : a ≠ b) (ha hb) : s.cons a ha \ s.cons b hb = {a} := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, cons_eq_insert, insert_sdiff_insert' hab ha]
theorem sdiff_insert_of_not_mem {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) (t : Finset α) : s \ insert x t = s \ t := by
refine Subset.antisymm (sdiff_subset_sdiff (Subset.refl _) (subset_insert _ _)) fun y hy => ?_
simp only [mem_sdiff, mem_insert, not_or] at hy ⊢
exact ⟨hy.1, fun hxy => h <| hxy ▸ hy.1, hy.2⟩
#align finset.sdiff_insert_of_not_mem Finset.sdiff_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp] theorem sdiff_subset {s t : Finset α} : s \ t ⊆ s := le_iff_subset.mp sdiff_le
#align finset.sdiff_subset Finset.sdiff_subset
theorem sdiff_ssubset (h : t ⊆ s) (ht : t.Nonempty) : s \ t ⊂ s :=
sdiff_lt (le_iff_subset.mpr h) ht.ne_empty
#align finset.sdiff_ssubset Finset.sdiff_ssubset
theorem union_sdiff_distrib (s₁ s₂ t : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \ t = s₁ \ t ∪ s₂ \ t :=
sup_sdiff
#align finset.union_sdiff_distrib Finset.union_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_union_distrib (s t₁ t₂ : Finset α) : s \ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s \ t₁ ∩ (s \ t₂) :=
sdiff_sup
#align finset.sdiff_union_distrib Finset.sdiff_union_distrib
theorem union_sdiff_self (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_self Finset.union_sdiff_self
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ singleton a = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
#align finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase Finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
#align finset.erase_eq Finset.erase_eq
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
#align finset.disjoint_erase_comm Finset.disjoint_erase_comm
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
#align finset.disjoint_of_erase_left Finset.disjoint_of_erase_left
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,318 | 2,320 | theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by |
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.geom_sum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Partial sums of geometric series
This file determines the values of the geometric series $\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i$ and
$\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i y^{n-1-i}$ and variants thereof. We also provide some bounds on the
"geometric" sum of `a/b^i` where `a b : ℕ`.
## Main statements
* `geom_sum_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^i=\frac{x^n-x^m}{x-1}$ in a division ring.
* `geom_sum₂_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^iy^{n - 1 - i}=\frac{x^n-y^{n-m}x^m}{x-y}$
in a field.
Several variants are recorded, generalising in particular to the case of a noncommutative ring in
which `x` and `y` commute. Even versions not using division or subtraction, valid in each semiring,
are recorded.
-/
-- Porting note: corrected type in the description of `geom_sum₂_Ico` (in the doc string only).
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Finset MulOpposite
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem geom_sum_succ {x : α} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = (x * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) + 1 := by
simp only [mul_sum, ← pow_succ', sum_range_succ', pow_zero]
#align geom_sum_succ geom_sum_succ
theorem geom_sum_succ' {x : α} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = x ^ n + ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
(sum_range_succ _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
#align geom_sum_succ' geom_sum_succ'
theorem geom_sum_zero (x : α) : ∑ i ∈ range 0, x ^ i = 0 :=
rfl
#align geom_sum_zero geom_sum_zero
theorem geom_sum_one (x : α) : ∑ i ∈ range 1, x ^ i = 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
#align geom_sum_one geom_sum_one
@[simp]
theorem geom_sum_two {x : α} : ∑ i ∈ range 2, x ^ i = x + 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
#align geom_sum_two geom_sum_two
@[simp]
theorem zero_geom_sum : ∀ {n}, ∑ i ∈ range n, (0 : α) ^ i = if n = 0 then 0 else 1
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| n + 2 => by
rw [geom_sum_succ']
simp [zero_geom_sum]
#align zero_geom_sum zero_geom_sum
theorem one_geom_sum (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, (1 : α) ^ i = n := by simp
#align one_geom_sum one_geom_sum
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem op_geom_sum (x : α) (n : ℕ) : op (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, op x ^ i := by
simp
#align op_geom_sum op_geom_sum
-- Porting note: linter suggested to change left hand side
@[simp]
theorem op_geom_sum₂ (x y : α) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ (n - 1 - i) * op x ^ i =
∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ i * op x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
rw [← sum_range_reflect]
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le] at j_in
congr
apply tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_right j_in
#align op_geom_sum₂ op_geom_sum₂
theorem geom_sum₂_with_one (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * 1 ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
sum_congr rfl fun i _ => by rw [one_pow, mul_one]
#align geom_sum₂_with_one geom_sum₂_with_one
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul_add {x y : α} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n := by
let f : ℕ → ℕ → α := fun m i : ℕ => (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (m - 1 - i)
-- Porting note: adding `hf` here, because below in two places `dsimp [f]` didn't work
have hf : ∀ m i : ℕ, f m i = (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (m - 1 - i) := by
simp only [ge_iff_le, tsub_le_iff_right, forall_const]
change (∑ i ∈ range n, (f n) i) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n
induction' n with n ih
· rw [range_zero, sum_empty, zero_mul, zero_add, pow_zero, pow_zero]
· have f_last : f (n + 1) n = (x + y) ^ n := by
rw [hf, ← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, Nat.add_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one]
have f_succ : ∀ i, i ∈ range n → f (n + 1) i = y * f n i := fun i hi => by
rw [hf]
have : Commute y ((x + y) ^ i) := (h.symm.add_right (Commute.refl y)).pow_right i
rw [← mul_assoc, this.eq, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ' y (n - 1 - i)]
congr 2
rw [add_tsub_cancel_right, ← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_comm 1 i]
have : i + 1 + (n - (i + 1)) = n := add_tsub_cancel_of_le (mem_range.mp hi)
rw [add_comm (i + 1)] at this
rw [← this, add_tsub_cancel_right, add_comm i 1, ← add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
rw [pow_succ' (x + y), add_mul, sum_range_succ_comm, add_mul, f_last, add_assoc]
rw [(((Commute.refl x).add_right h).pow_right n).eq]
congr 1
rw [sum_congr rfl f_succ, ← mul_sum, pow_succ' y, mul_assoc, ← mul_add y, ih]
#align commute.geom_sum₂_mul_add Commute.geom_sum₂_mul_add
end Semiring
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_geom_sum [Ring α] {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range n, (-1 : α) ^ i = if Even n then 0 else 1 := by
induction' n with k hk
· simp
· simp only [geom_sum_succ', Nat.even_add_one, hk]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.neg_one_pow, add_zero]
· rw [(Nat.odd_iff_not_even.2 h).neg_one_pow, neg_add_self]
#align neg_one_geom_sum neg_one_geom_sum
theorem geom_sum₂_self {α : Type*} [CommRing α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) = n * x ^ (n - 1) :=
calc
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ (i + (n - 1 - i)) := by
simp_rw [← pow_add]
_ = ∑ _i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ (n - 1) :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi =>
congr_arg _ <| add_tsub_cancel_of_le <| Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi
_ = (Finset.range n).card • x ^ (n - 1) := Finset.sum_const _
_ = n * x ^ (n - 1) := by rw [Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul]
#align geom_sum₂_self geom_sum₂_self
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_add [CommSemiring α] (x y : α) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
#align geom_sum₂_mul_add geom_sum₂_mul_add
theorem geom_sum_mul_add [Semiring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + 1) ^ i) * x + 1 = (x + 1) ^ n := by
have := (Commute.one_right x).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
rw [one_pow, geom_sum₂_with_one] at this
exact this
#align geom_sum_mul_add geom_sum_mul_add
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul [Ring α] {x y : α} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
have := (h.sub_left (Commute.refl y)).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
rw [sub_add_cancel] at this
rw [← this, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align commute.geom_sum₂_mul Commute.geom_sum₂_mul
theorem Commute.mul_neg_geom_sum₂ [Ring α] {x y : α} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
((y - x) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = y ^ n - x ^ n := by
apply op_injective
simp only [op_mul, op_sub, op_geom_sum₂, op_pow]
simp [(Commute.op h.symm).geom_sum₂_mul n]
#align commute.mul_neg_geom_sum₂ Commute.mul_neg_geom_sum₂
theorem Commute.mul_geom_sum₂ [Ring α] {x y : α} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
rw [← neg_sub (y ^ n), ← h.mul_neg_geom_sum₂, ← neg_mul, neg_sub]
#align commute.mul_geom_sum₂ Commute.mul_geom_sum₂
theorem geom_sum₂_mul [CommRing α] (x y : α) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_mul n
#align geom_sum₂_mul geom_sum₂_mul
theorem Commute.sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow [Ring α] {x y : α} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n :=
Dvd.intro _ <| h.mul_geom_sum₂ _
theorem sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow [CommRing α] (x y : α) (n : ℕ) : x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
#align sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow
theorem one_sub_dvd_one_sub_pow [Ring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
1 - x ∣ 1 - x ^ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_pow n]
exact (Commute.one_left x).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
theorem sub_one_dvd_pow_sub_one [Ring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
x - 1 ∣ x ^ n - 1 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_pow n]
exact (Commute.one_right x).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
theorem nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x y n : ℕ) : x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n := by
rcases le_or_lt y x with h | h
· have : y ^ n ≤ x ^ n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left h _
exact mod_cast sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x : ℤ) (↑y) n
· have : x ^ n ≤ y ^ n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left h.le _
exact (Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le this).symm ▸ dvd_zero (x - y)
#align nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow
theorem Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow [CommRing α] (x y : α) {n : ℕ} (h : Odd n) :
x + y ∣ x ^ n + y ^ n := by
have h₁ := geom_sum₂_mul x (-y) n
rw [Odd.neg_pow h y, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_neg_eq_add] at h₁
exact Dvd.intro_left _ h₁
#align odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow
theorem Odd.nat_add_dvd_pow_add_pow (x y : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : Odd n) : x + y ∣ x ^ n + y ^ n :=
mod_cast Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow (x : ℤ) (↑y) h
#align odd.nat_add_dvd_pow_add_pow Odd.nat_add_dvd_pow_add_pow
theorem geom_sum_mul [Ring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - 1 := by
have := (Commute.one_right x).geom_sum₂_mul n
rw [one_pow, geom_sum₂_with_one] at this
exact this
#align geom_sum_mul geom_sum_mul
theorem mul_geom_sum [Ring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) : ((x - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = x ^ n - 1 :=
op_injective <| by simpa using geom_sum_mul (op x) n
#align mul_geom_sum mul_geom_sum
theorem geom_sum_mul_neg [Ring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 - x ^ n := by
have := congr_arg Neg.neg (geom_sum_mul x n)
rw [neg_sub, ← mul_neg, neg_sub] at this
exact this
#align geom_sum_mul_neg geom_sum_mul_neg
theorem mul_neg_geom_sum [Ring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) : ((1 - x) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = 1 - x ^ n :=
op_injective <| by simpa using geom_sum_mul_neg (op x) n
#align mul_neg_geom_sum mul_neg_geom_sum
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_comm {α : Type u} [Semiring α] {x y : α} (n : ℕ)
(h : Commute x y) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, y ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
cases n; · simp
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
rw [← Finset.sum_flip]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
simpa [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp (Finset.mem_range.mp hi))] using h.pow_pow _ _
#align commute.geom_sum₂_comm Commute.geom_sum₂_comm
theorem geom_sum₂_comm {α : Type u} [CommSemiring α] (x y : α) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, y ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_comm n
#align geom_sum₂_comm geom_sum₂_comm
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂ [DivisionRing α] {x y : α} (h' : Commute x y) (h : x ≠ y)
(n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) := by
have : x - y ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← h'.geom_sum₂_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
#align commute.geom_sum₂ Commute.geom_sum₂
theorem geom₂_sum [Field α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂ h n
#align geom₂_sum geom₂_sum
theorem geom_sum_eq [DivisionRing α] {x : α} (h : x ≠ 1) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - 1) / (x - 1) := by
have : x - 1 ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← geom_sum_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
#align geom_sum_eq geom_sum_eq
protected theorem Commute.mul_geom_sum₂_Ico [Ring α] {x y : α} (h : Commute x y) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn]
have :
∑ k ∈ range m, x ^ k * y ^ (n - 1 - k) =
∑ k ∈ range m, x ^ k * (y ^ (n - m) * y ^ (m - 1 - k)) := by
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [← pow_add]
congr
rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, add_comm] at j_in
have h' : n - m + (m - (1 + j)) = n - (1 + j) := tsub_add_tsub_cancel hmn j_in
rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub m, h', ← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub]
rw [this]
simp_rw [pow_mul_comm y (n - m) _]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc]
rw [← sum_mul, mul_sub, h.mul_geom_sum₂, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_geom_sum₂, sub_mul, ← pow_add,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right (x ^ n) (x ^ m * y ^ (n - m)) (y ^ n)]
#align commute.mul_geom_sum₂_Ico Commute.mul_geom_sum₂_Ico
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_succ_eq {α : Type u} [Ring α] {x y : α} (h : Commute x y)
{n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i * y ^ (n - i) =
x ^ n + y * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, sum_range_succ_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one, add_right_inj, ← mul_assoc,
(h.symm.pow_right _).eq, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ']
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
suffices n - 1 - i + 1 = n - i by rw [this]
cases' n with n
· exact absurd (List.mem_range.mp hi) i.not_lt_zero
· rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (List.mem_range.mp hi)),
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr n.succ_pos)]
#align commute.geom_sum₂_succ_eq Commute.geom_sum₂_succ_eq
theorem geom_sum₂_succ_eq {α : Type u} [CommRing α] (x y : α) {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i * y ^ (n - i) =
x ^ n + y * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_succ_eq
#align geom_sum₂_succ_eq geom_sum₂_succ_eq
theorem mul_geom_sum₂_Ico [CommRing α] (x y : α) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) :=
(Commute.all x y).mul_geom_sum₂_Ico hmn
#align mul_geom_sum₂_Ico mul_geom_sum₂_Ico
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul [Ring α] {x y : α} (h : Commute x y) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m := by
apply op_injective
simp only [op_sub, op_mul, op_pow, op_sum]
have : (∑ k ∈ Ico m n, MulOpposite.op y ^ (n - 1 - k) * MulOpposite.op x ^ k) =
∑ k ∈ Ico m n, MulOpposite.op x ^ k * MulOpposite.op y ^ (n - 1 - k) := by
refine sum_congr rfl fun k _ => ?_
have hp := Commute.pow_pow (Commute.op h.symm) (n - 1 - k) k
simpa [Commute, SemiconjBy] using hp
simp only [this]
-- Porting note: gives deterministic timeout without this intermediate `have`
convert (Commute.op h).mul_geom_sum₂_Ico hmn
#align commute.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul
theorem geom_sum_Ico_mul [Ring α] (x : α) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - x ^ m := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, sub_mul, geom_sum_mul, geom_sum_mul, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
#align geom_sum_Ico_mul geom_sum_Ico_mul
theorem geom_sum_Ico_mul_neg [Ring α] (x : α) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = x ^ m - x ^ n := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, sub_mul, geom_sum_mul_neg, geom_sum_mul_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left]
#align geom_sum_Ico_mul_neg geom_sum_Ico_mul_neg
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico [DivisionRing α] {x y : α} (h : Commute x y) (hxy : x ≠ y)
{m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = (x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m) / (x - y) := by
have : x - y ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← h.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul hmn, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
#align commute.geom_sum₂_Ico Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico
theorem geom_sum₂_Ico [Field α] {x y : α} (hxy : x ≠ y) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = (x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m) / (x - y) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_Ico hxy hmn
#align geom_sum₂_Ico geom_sum₂_Ico
theorem geom_sum_Ico [DivisionRing α] {x : α} (hx : x ≠ 1) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - x ^ m) / (x - 1) := by
simp only [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, geom_sum_eq hx, div_sub_div_same, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
#align geom_sum_Ico geom_sum_Ico
theorem geom_sum_Ico' [DivisionRing α] {x : α} (hx : x ≠ 1) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i = (x ^ m - x ^ n) / (1 - x) := by
simp only [geom_sum_Ico hx hmn]
convert neg_div_neg_eq (x ^ m - x ^ n) (1 - x) using 2 <;> abel
#align geom_sum_Ico' geom_sum_Ico'
theorem geom_sum_Ico_le_of_lt_one [LinearOrderedField α] {x : α} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x < 1)
{m n : ℕ} : ∑ i ∈ Ico m n, x ^ i ≤ x ^ m / (1 - x) := by
rcases le_or_lt m n with (hmn | hmn)
· rw [geom_sum_Ico' h'x.ne hmn]
apply div_le_div (pow_nonneg hx _) _ (sub_pos.2 h'x) le_rfl
simpa using pow_nonneg hx _
· rw [Ico_eq_empty, sum_empty]
· apply div_nonneg (pow_nonneg hx _)
simpa using h'x.le
· simpa using hmn.le
#align geom_sum_Ico_le_of_lt_one geom_sum_Ico_le_of_lt_one
theorem geom_sum_inv [DivisionRing α] {x : α} (hx1 : x ≠ 1) (hx0 : x ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x⁻¹ ^ i = (x - 1)⁻¹ * (x - x⁻¹ ^ n * x) := by
have h₁ : x⁻¹ ≠ 1 := by rwa [inv_eq_one_div, Ne, div_eq_iff_mul_eq hx0, one_mul]
have h₂ : x⁻¹ - 1 ≠ 0 := mt sub_eq_zero.1 h₁
have h₃ : x - 1 ≠ 0 := mt sub_eq_zero.1 hx1
have h₄ : x * (x ^ n)⁻¹ = (x ^ n)⁻¹ * x :=
Nat.recOn n (by simp) fun n h => by
rw [pow_succ', mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, h, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hx0, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel hx0]
rw [geom_sum_eq h₁, div_eq_iff_mul_eq h₂, ← mul_right_inj' h₃, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
mul_inv_cancel h₃]
simp [mul_add, add_mul, mul_inv_cancel hx0, mul_assoc, h₄, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm,
add_left_comm]
rw [add_comm _ (-x), add_assoc, add_assoc _ _ 1]
#align geom_sum_inv geom_sum_inv
variable {β : Type*}
-- TODO: for consistency, the next two lemmas should be moved to the root namespace
theorem RingHom.map_geom_sum [Semiring α] [Semiring β] (x : α) (n : ℕ) (f : α →+* β) :
f (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, f x ^ i := by simp [map_sum f]
#align ring_hom.map_geom_sum RingHom.map_geom_sum
theorem RingHom.map_geom_sum₂ [Semiring α] [Semiring β] (x y : α) (n : ℕ) (f : α →+* β) :
f (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = ∑ i ∈ range n, f x ^ i * f y ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
simp [map_sum f]
#align ring_hom.map_geom_sum₂ RingHom.map_geom_sum₂
/-! ### Geometric sum with `ℕ`-division -/
theorem Nat.pred_mul_geom_sum_le (a b n : ℕ) :
((b - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range n.succ, a / b ^ i) ≤ a * b - a / b ^ n :=
calc
((b - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range n.succ, a / b ^ i) =
(∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ (i + 1) * b) + a * b - ((∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ i) + a / b ^ n) := by
rw [tsub_mul, mul_comm, sum_mul, one_mul, sum_range_succ', sum_range_succ, pow_zero,
Nat.div_one]
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ i) + a * b - ((∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ i) + a / b ^ n) := by
refine tsub_le_tsub_right (add_le_add_right (sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_) _) _
rw [pow_succ', mul_comm b]
rw [← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul]
exact Nat.div_mul_le_self _ _
_ = a * b - a / b ^ n := add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_left _ _ _
#align nat.pred_mul_geom_sum_le Nat.pred_mul_geom_sum_le
theorem Nat.geom_sum_le {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (a n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ i ≤ a * b / (b - 1) := by
refine (Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le <| tsub_pos_of_lt hb).2 ?_
cases' n with n
· rw [sum_range_zero, zero_mul]
exact Nat.zero_le _
rw [mul_comm]
exact (Nat.pred_mul_geom_sum_le a b n).trans tsub_le_self
#align nat.geom_sum_le Nat.geom_sum_le
theorem Nat.geom_sum_Ico_le {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (a n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ Ico 1 n, a / b ^ i ≤ a / (b - 1) := by
cases' n with n
· rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le (zero_le_one' ℕ), sum_empty]
exact Nat.zero_le _
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left a]
calc
(a + ∑ i ∈ Ico 1 n.succ, a / b ^ i) = a / b ^ 0 + ∑ i ∈ Ico 1 n.succ, a / b ^ i := by
rw [pow_zero, Nat.div_one]
_ = ∑ i ∈ range n.succ, a / b ^ i := by
rw [range_eq_Ico, ← Nat.Ico_insert_succ_left (Nat.succ_pos _), sum_insert]
exact fun h => zero_lt_one.not_le (mem_Ico.1 h).1
_ ≤ a * b / (b - 1) := Nat.geom_sum_le hb a _
_ = (a * 1 + a * (b - 1)) / (b - 1) := by
rw [← mul_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le (one_le_two.trans hb)]
_ = a + a / (b - 1) := by rw [mul_one, Nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ (tsub_pos_of_lt hb), add_comm]
#align nat.geom_sum_Ico_le Nat.geom_sum_Ico_le
section Order
variable {n : ℕ} {x : α}
theorem geom_sum_pos [StrictOrderedSemiring α] (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
sum_pos' (fun k _ => pow_nonneg hx _) ⟨0, mem_range.2 hn.bot_lt, by simp⟩
#align geom_sum_pos geom_sum_pos
theorem geom_sum_pos_and_lt_one [StrictOrderedRing α] (hx : x < 0) (hx' : 0 < x + 1) (hn : 1 < n) :
(0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) ∧ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i < 1 := by
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n (show 2 ≤ n from hn)
· rw [geom_sum_two]
exact ⟨hx', (add_lt_iff_neg_right _).2 hx⟩
clear hn
intro n _ ihn
rw [geom_sum_succ, add_lt_iff_neg_right, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add', neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact
⟨mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_left (neg_nonneg.2 hx.le) (neg_lt_iff_pos_add'.2 hx') ihn.2.le,
mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos hx ihn.1⟩
#align geom_sum_pos_and_lt_one geom_sum_pos_and_lt_one
theorem geom_sum_alternating_of_le_neg_one [StrictOrderedRing α] (hx : x + 1 ≤ 0) (n : ℕ) :
if Even n then (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) ≤ 0 else 1 ≤ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by
have hx0 : x ≤ 0 := (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one).trans hx
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, range_zero, sum_empty, le_refl, ite_true, even_zero]
simp only [Nat.even_add_one, geom_sum_succ]
split_ifs at ih with h
· rw [if_neg (not_not_intro h), le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos hx0 ih
· rw [if_pos h]
refine (add_le_add_right ?_ _).trans hx
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left ih hx0
#align geom_sum_alternating_of_le_neg_one geom_sum_alternating_of_le_neg_one
theorem geom_sum_alternating_of_lt_neg_one [StrictOrderedRing α] (hx : x + 1 < 0) (hn : 1 < n) :
if Even n then (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) < 0 else 1 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by
have hx0 : x < 0 := ((le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).2 zero_le_one).trans_lt hx
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n (show 2 ≤ n from hn)
· simp only [geom_sum_two, lt_add_iff_pos_left, ite_true, gt_iff_lt, hx, even_two]
clear hn
intro n _ ihn
simp only [Nat.even_add_one, geom_sum_succ]
by_cases hn' : Even n
· rw [if_pos hn'] at ihn
rw [if_neg, lt_add_iff_pos_left]
· exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg hx0 ihn
· exact not_not_intro hn'
· rw [if_neg hn'] at ihn
rw [if_pos]
swap
· exact hn'
have := add_lt_add_right (mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left ihn hx0) 1
rw [mul_one] at this
exact this.trans hx
#align geom_sum_alternating_of_lt_neg_one geom_sum_alternating_of_lt_neg_one
theorem geom_sum_pos' [LinearOrderedRing α] (hx : 0 < x + 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by
obtain _ | _ | n := n
· cases hn rfl
· simp only [zero_add, range_one, sum_singleton, pow_zero, zero_lt_one]
obtain hx' | hx' := lt_or_le x 0
· exact (geom_sum_pos_and_lt_one hx' hx n.one_lt_succ_succ).1
· exact geom_sum_pos hx' (by simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff])
#align geom_sum_pos' geom_sum_pos'
theorem Odd.geom_sum_pos [LinearOrderedRing α] (h : Odd n) : 0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | k)
· exact ((show ¬Odd 0 by decide) h).elim
· simp only [zero_add, range_one, sum_singleton, pow_zero, zero_lt_one]
rw [Nat.odd_iff_not_even] at h
rcases lt_trichotomy (x + 1) 0 with (hx | hx | hx)
· have := geom_sum_alternating_of_lt_neg_one hx k.one_lt_succ_succ
simp only [h, if_false] at this
exact zero_lt_one.trans this
· simp only [eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hx, h, neg_one_geom_sum, if_false, zero_lt_one]
· exact geom_sum_pos' hx k.succ.succ_ne_zero
#align odd.geom_sum_pos Odd.geom_sum_pos
theorem geom_sum_pos_iff [LinearOrderedRing α] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) ↔ Odd n ∨ 0 < x + 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, ← not_le, ← Nat.even_iff_not_odd]
refine fun hn hx => h.not_le ?_
simpa [if_pos hn] using geom_sum_alternating_of_le_neg_one hx n
· rintro (hn | hx')
· exact hn.geom_sum_pos
· exact geom_sum_pos' hx' hn
#align geom_sum_pos_iff geom_sum_pos_iff
theorem geom_sum_ne_zero [LinearOrderedRing α] (hx : x ≠ -1) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i ≠ 0 := by
obtain _ | _ | n := n
· cases hn rfl
· simp only [zero_add, range_one, sum_singleton, pow_zero, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
rw [Ne, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← Ne] at hx
obtain h | h := hx.lt_or_lt
· have := geom_sum_alternating_of_lt_neg_one h n.one_lt_succ_succ
split_ifs at this
· exact this.ne
· exact (zero_lt_one.trans this).ne'
· exact (geom_sum_pos' h n.succ.succ_ne_zero).ne'
#align geom_sum_ne_zero geom_sum_ne_zero
| Mathlib/Algebra/GeomSum.lean | 567 | 575 | theorem geom_sum_eq_zero_iff_neg_one [LinearOrderedRing α] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i = 0 ↔ x = -1 ∧ Even n := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, @fun ⟨h, hn⟩ => by simp only [h, hn, neg_one_geom_sum, if_true]⟩
contrapose! h
have hx := eq_or_ne x (-1)
cases' hx with hx hx
· rw [hx, neg_one_geom_sum]
simp only [h hx, ite_false, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
· exact geom_sum_ne_zero hx hn
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Atlas
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.VectorBundle.FiberwiseLinear
import Mathlib.Topology.VectorBundle.Constructions
#align_import geometry.manifold.vector_bundle.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
/-! # Smooth vector bundles
This file defines smooth vector bundles over a smooth manifold.
Let `E` be a topological vector bundle, with model fiber `F` and base space `B`. We consider `E` as
carrying a charted space structure given by its trivializations -- these are charts to `B × F`.
Then, by "composition", if `B` is itself a charted space over `H` (e.g. a smooth manifold), then `E`
is also a charted space over `H × F`.
Now, we define `SmoothVectorBundle` as the `Prop` of having smooth transition functions.
Recall the structure groupoid `smoothFiberwiseLinear` on `B × F` consisting of smooth, fiberwise
linear partial homeomorphisms. We show that our definition of "smooth vector bundle" implies
`HasGroupoid` for this groupoid, and show (by a "composition" of `HasGroupoid` instances) that
this means that a smooth vector bundle is a smooth manifold.
Since `SmoothVectorBundle` is a mixin, it should be easy to make variants and for many such
variants to coexist -- vector bundles can be smooth vector bundles over several different base
fields, they can also be C^k vector bundles, etc.
## Main definitions and constructions
* `FiberBundle.chartedSpace`: A fiber bundle `E` over a base `B` with model fiber `F` is naturally
a charted space modelled on `B × F`.
* `FiberBundle.chartedSpace'`: Let `B` be a charted space modelled on `HB`. Then a fiber bundle
`E` over a base `B` with model fiber `F` is naturally a charted space modelled on `HB.prod F`.
* `SmoothVectorBundle`: Mixin class stating that a (topological) `VectorBundle` is smooth, in the
sense of having smooth transition functions.
* `SmoothFiberwiseLinear.hasGroupoid`: For a smooth vector bundle `E` over `B` with fiber
modelled on `F`, the change-of-co-ordinates between two trivializations `e`, `e'` for `E`,
considered as charts to `B × F`, is smooth and fiberwise linear, in the sense of belonging to the
structure groupoid `smoothFiberwiseLinear`.
* `Bundle.TotalSpace.smoothManifoldWithCorners`: A smooth vector bundle is naturally a smooth
manifold.
* `VectorBundleCore.smoothVectorBundle`: If a (topological) `VectorBundleCore` is smooth,
in the sense of having smooth transition functions (cf. `VectorBundleCore.IsSmooth`),
then the vector bundle constructed from it is a smooth vector bundle.
* `VectorPrebundle.smoothVectorBundle`: If a `VectorPrebundle` is smooth,
in the sense of having smooth transition functions (cf. `VectorPrebundle.IsSmooth`),
then the vector bundle constructed from it is a smooth vector bundle.
* `Bundle.Prod.smoothVectorBundle`: The direct sum of two smooth vector bundles is a smooth vector
bundle.
-/
assert_not_exists mfderiv
open Bundle Set PartialHomeomorph
open Function (id_def)
open Filter
open scoped Manifold Bundle Topology
variable {𝕜 B B' F M : Type*} {E : B → Type*}
/-! ### Charted space structure on a fiber bundle -/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)] [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)]
{HB : Type*} [TopologicalSpace HB] [TopologicalSpace B] [ChartedSpace HB B] [FiberBundle F E]
/-- A fiber bundle `E` over a base `B` with model fiber `F` is naturally a charted space modelled on
`B × F`. -/
instance FiberBundle.chartedSpace' : ChartedSpace (B × F) (TotalSpace F E) where
atlas := (fun e : Trivialization F (π F E) => e.toPartialHomeomorph) '' trivializationAtlas F E
chartAt x := (trivializationAt F E x.proj).toPartialHomeomorph
mem_chart_source x :=
(trivializationAt F E x.proj).mem_source.mpr (mem_baseSet_trivializationAt F E x.proj)
chart_mem_atlas _ := mem_image_of_mem _ (trivialization_mem_atlas F E _)
#align fiber_bundle.charted_space FiberBundle.chartedSpace'
theorem FiberBundle.chartedSpace'_chartAt (x : TotalSpace F E) :
chartAt (B × F) x = (trivializationAt F E x.proj).toPartialHomeomorph :=
rfl
/- Porting note: In Lean 3, the next instance was inside a section with locally reducible
`ModelProd` and it used `ModelProd B F` as the intermediate space. Using `B × F` in the middle
gives the same instance.
-/
--attribute [local reducible] ModelProd
/-- Let `B` be a charted space modelled on `HB`. Then a fiber bundle `E` over a base `B` with model
fiber `F` is naturally a charted space modelled on `HB.prod F`. -/
instance FiberBundle.chartedSpace : ChartedSpace (ModelProd HB F) (TotalSpace F E) :=
ChartedSpace.comp _ (B × F) _
#align fiber_bundle.charted_space' FiberBundle.chartedSpace
theorem FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt (x : TotalSpace F E) :
chartAt (ModelProd HB F) x =
(trivializationAt F E x.proj).toPartialHomeomorph ≫ₕ
(chartAt HB x.proj).prod (PartialHomeomorph.refl F) := by
dsimp only [chartAt_comp, prodChartedSpace_chartAt, FiberBundle.chartedSpace'_chartAt,
chartAt_self_eq]
rw [Trivialization.coe_coe, Trivialization.coe_fst' _ (mem_baseSet_trivializationAt F E x.proj)]
#align fiber_bundle.charted_space_chart_at FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt
theorem FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt_symm_fst (x : TotalSpace F E) (y : ModelProd HB F)
(hy : y ∈ (chartAt (ModelProd HB F) x).target) :
((chartAt (ModelProd HB F) x).symm y).proj = (chartAt HB x.proj).symm y.1 := by
simp only [FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt, mfld_simps] at hy ⊢
exact (trivializationAt F E x.proj).proj_symm_apply hy.2
#align fiber_bundle.charted_space_chart_at_symm_fst FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt_symm_fst
end
section
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
[TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)] [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)] {EB : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup EB] [NormedSpace 𝕜 EB] {HB : Type*} [TopologicalSpace HB]
(IB : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 EB HB) (E' : B → Type*) [∀ x, Zero (E' x)] {EM : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup EM] [NormedSpace 𝕜 EM] {HM : Type*} [TopologicalSpace HM]
{IM : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 EM HM} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace HM M]
[Is : SmoothManifoldWithCorners IM M] {n : ℕ∞}
variable [TopologicalSpace B] [ChartedSpace HB B] [FiberBundle F E]
protected theorem FiberBundle.extChartAt (x : TotalSpace F E) :
extChartAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) x =
(trivializationAt F E x.proj).toPartialEquiv ≫
(extChartAt IB x.proj).prod (PartialEquiv.refl F) := by
simp_rw [extChartAt, FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt, extend]
simp only [PartialEquiv.trans_assoc, mfld_simps]
-- Porting note: should not be needed
rw [PartialEquiv.prod_trans, PartialEquiv.refl_trans]
#align fiber_bundle.ext_chart_at FiberBundle.extChartAt
protected theorem FiberBundle.extChartAt_target (x : TotalSpace F E) :
(extChartAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) x).target =
((extChartAt IB x.proj).target ∩
(extChartAt IB x.proj).symm ⁻¹' (trivializationAt F E x.proj).baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
rw [FiberBundle.extChartAt, PartialEquiv.trans_target, Trivialization.target_eq, inter_prod]
rfl
theorem FiberBundle.writtenInExtChartAt_trivializationAt {x : TotalSpace F E} {y}
(hy : y ∈ (extChartAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) x).target) :
writtenInExtChartAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) x
(trivializationAt F E x.proj) y = y :=
writtenInExtChartAt_chartAt_comp _ _ hy
theorem FiberBundle.writtenInExtChartAt_trivializationAt_symm {x : TotalSpace F E} {y}
(hy : y ∈ (extChartAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) x).target) :
writtenInExtChartAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) (trivializationAt F E x.proj x)
(trivializationAt F E x.proj).toPartialHomeomorph.symm y = y :=
writtenInExtChartAt_chartAt_symm_comp _ _ hy
/-! ### Smoothness of maps in/out fiber bundles
Note: For these results we don't need that the bundle is a smooth vector bundle, or even a vector
bundle at all, just that it is a fiber bundle over a charted base space.
-/
namespace Bundle
variable {IB}
/-- Characterization of C^n functions into a smooth vector bundle. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_totalSpace (f : M → TotalSpace F E) {s : Set M} {x₀ : M} :
ContMDiffWithinAt IM (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) n f s x₀ ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt IM IB n (fun x => (f x).proj) s x₀ ∧
ContMDiffWithinAt IM 𝓘(𝕜, F) n (fun x ↦ (trivializationAt F E (f x₀).proj (f x)).2) s x₀ := by
simp (config := { singlePass := true }) only [contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target]
rw [and_and_and_comm, ← FiberBundle.continuousWithinAt_totalSpace, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hf
simp_rw [modelWithCornersSelf_prod, FiberBundle.extChartAt, Function.comp,
PartialEquiv.trans_apply, PartialEquiv.prod_coe, PartialEquiv.refl_coe,
extChartAt_self_apply, modelWithCornersSelf_coe, Function.id_def, ← chartedSpaceSelf_prod]
refine (contMDiffWithinAt_prod_iff _).trans (and_congr ?_ Iff.rfl)
have h1 : (fun x => (f x).proj) ⁻¹' (trivializationAt F E (f x₀).proj).baseSet ∈ 𝓝[s] x₀ :=
((FiberBundle.continuous_proj F E).continuousWithinAt.comp hf (mapsTo_image f s))
((Trivialization.open_baseSet _).mem_nhds (mem_baseSet_trivializationAt F E _))
refine EventuallyEq.contMDiffWithinAt_iff (eventually_of_mem h1 fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· simp_rw [Function.comp, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, Trivialization.coe_coe]
rw [Trivialization.coe_fst']
exact hx
· simp only [mfld_simps]
#align bundle.cont_mdiff_within_at_total_space Bundle.contMDiffWithinAt_totalSpace
/-- Characterization of C^n functions into a smooth vector bundle. -/
theorem contMDiffAt_totalSpace (f : M → TotalSpace F E) (x₀ : M) :
ContMDiffAt IM (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) n f x₀ ↔
ContMDiffAt IM IB n (fun x => (f x).proj) x₀ ∧
ContMDiffAt IM 𝓘(𝕜, F) n (fun x => (trivializationAt F E (f x₀).proj (f x)).2) x₀ := by
simp_rw [← contMDiffWithinAt_univ]; exact contMDiffWithinAt_totalSpace f
#align bundle.cont_mdiff_at_total_space Bundle.contMDiffAt_totalSpace
/-- Characterization of C^n sections of a smooth vector bundle. -/
theorem contMDiffAt_section (s : ∀ x, E x) (x₀ : B) :
ContMDiffAt IB (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) n (fun x => TotalSpace.mk' F x (s x)) x₀ ↔
ContMDiffAt IB 𝓘(𝕜, F) n (fun x ↦ (trivializationAt F E x₀ ⟨x, s x⟩).2) x₀ := by
simp_rw [contMDiffAt_totalSpace, and_iff_right_iff_imp]; intro; exact contMDiffAt_id
#align bundle.cont_mdiff_at_section Bundle.contMDiffAt_section
variable (E)
theorem contMDiff_proj : ContMDiff (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) IB n (π F E) := fun x ↦ by
have : ContMDiffAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) n id x := contMDiffAt_id
rw [contMDiffAt_totalSpace] at this
exact this.1
#align bundle.cont_mdiff_proj Bundle.contMDiff_proj
theorem smooth_proj : Smooth (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) IB (π F E) :=
contMDiff_proj E
#align bundle.smooth_proj Bundle.smooth_proj
theorem contMDiffOn_proj {s : Set (TotalSpace F E)} :
ContMDiffOn (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) IB n (π F E) s :=
(Bundle.contMDiff_proj E).contMDiffOn
#align bundle.cont_mdiff_on_proj Bundle.contMDiffOn_proj
theorem smoothOn_proj {s : Set (TotalSpace F E)} : SmoothOn (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) IB (π F E) s :=
contMDiffOn_proj E
#align bundle.smooth_on_proj Bundle.smoothOn_proj
theorem contMDiffAt_proj {p : TotalSpace F E} : ContMDiffAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) IB n (π F E) p :=
(Bundle.contMDiff_proj E).contMDiffAt
#align bundle.cont_mdiff_at_proj Bundle.contMDiffAt_proj
theorem smoothAt_proj {p : TotalSpace F E} : SmoothAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) IB (π F E) p :=
Bundle.contMDiffAt_proj E
#align bundle.smooth_at_proj Bundle.smoothAt_proj
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_proj {s : Set (TotalSpace F E)} {p : TotalSpace F E} :
ContMDiffWithinAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) IB n (π F E) s p :=
(Bundle.contMDiffAt_proj E).contMDiffWithinAt
#align bundle.cont_mdiff_within_at_proj Bundle.contMDiffWithinAt_proj
theorem smoothWithinAt_proj {s : Set (TotalSpace F E)} {p : TotalSpace F E} :
SmoothWithinAt (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) IB (π F E) s p :=
Bundle.contMDiffWithinAt_proj E
#align bundle.smooth_within_at_proj Bundle.smoothWithinAt_proj
variable (𝕜) [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
variable [∀ x, Module 𝕜 (E x)] [VectorBundle 𝕜 F E]
theorem smooth_zeroSection : Smooth IB (IB.prod 𝓘(𝕜, F)) (zeroSection F E) := fun x ↦ by
unfold zeroSection
rw [Bundle.contMDiffAt_section]
apply (contMDiffAt_const (c := 0)).congr_of_eventuallyEq
filter_upwards [(trivializationAt F E x).open_baseSet.mem_nhds
(mem_baseSet_trivializationAt F E x)] with y hy
using congr_arg Prod.snd <| (trivializationAt F E x).zeroSection 𝕜 hy
#align bundle.smooth_zero_section Bundle.smooth_zeroSection
end Bundle
end
/-! ### Smooth vector bundles -/
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {EB : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup EB] [NormedSpace 𝕜 EB]
{HB : Type*} [TopologicalSpace HB] (IB : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 EB HB) [TopologicalSpace B]
[ChartedSpace HB B] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners IB B] {EM : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup EM]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 EM] {HM : Type*} [TopologicalSpace HM] {IM : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 EM HM}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace HM M] [Is : SmoothManifoldWithCorners IM M] {n : ℕ∞}
[∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module 𝕜 (E x)] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
section WithTopology
variable [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)] [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)] (F E)
variable [FiberBundle F E] [VectorBundle 𝕜 F E]
/-- When `B` is a smooth manifold with corners with respect to a model `IB` and `E` is a
topological vector bundle over `B` with fibers isomorphic to `F`, then `SmoothVectorBundle F E IB`
registers that the bundle is smooth, in the sense of having smooth transition functions.
This is a mixin, not carrying any new data. -/
class SmoothVectorBundle : Prop where
protected smoothOn_coordChangeL :
∀ (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [MemTrivializationAtlas e] [MemTrivializationAtlas e'],
SmoothOn IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (fun b : B => (e.coordChangeL 𝕜 e' b : F →L[𝕜] F))
(e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet)
#align smooth_vector_bundle SmoothVectorBundle
#align smooth_vector_bundle.smooth_on_coord_change SmoothVectorBundle.smoothOn_coordChangeL
variable [SmoothVectorBundle F E IB]
section SmoothCoordChange
variable {F E}
variable (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [MemTrivializationAtlas e] [MemTrivializationAtlas e']
theorem smoothOn_coordChangeL :
SmoothOn IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (fun b : B => (e.coordChangeL 𝕜 e' b : F →L[𝕜] F))
(e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :=
SmoothVectorBundle.smoothOn_coordChangeL e e'
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/VectorBundle/Basic.lean | 308 | 313 | theorem smoothOn_symm_coordChangeL :
SmoothOn IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (fun b : B => ((e.coordChangeL 𝕜 e' b).symm : F →L[𝕜] F))
(e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) := by |
rw [inter_comm]
refine (SmoothVectorBundle.smoothOn_coordChangeL e' e).congr fun b hb ↦ ?_
rw [e.symm_coordChangeL e' hb]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.graded_algebra.homogeneous_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4e861f25ba5ceef42ba0712d8ffeb32f38ad6441"
/-!
# Homogeneous ideals of a graded algebra
This file defines homogeneous ideals of `GradedRing 𝒜` where `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A` and
operations on them.
## Main definitions
For any `I : Ideal A`:
* `Ideal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 I`: The property that an ideal is closed under `GradedRing.proj`.
* `HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜`: The structure extending ideals which satisfy `Ideal.IsHomogeneous`.
* `Ideal.homogeneousCore I 𝒜`: The largest homogeneous ideal smaller than `I`.
* `Ideal.homogeneousHull I 𝒜`: The smallest homogeneous ideal larger than `I`.
## Main statements
* `HomogeneousIdeal.completeLattice`: `Ideal.IsHomogeneous` is preserved by `⊥`, `⊤`, `⊔`, `⊓`,
`⨆`, `⨅`, and so the subtype of homogeneous ideals inherits a complete lattice structure.
* `Ideal.homogeneousCore.gi`: `Ideal.homogeneousCore` forms a galois insertion with coercion.
* `Ideal.homogeneousHull.gi`: `Ideal.homogeneousHull` forms a galois insertion with coercion.
## Implementation notes
We introduce `Ideal.homogeneousCore'` earlier than might be expected so that we can get access
to `Ideal.IsHomogeneous.iff_exists` as quickly as possible.
## Tags
graded algebra, homogeneous
-/
open SetLike DirectSum Set
open Pointwise DirectSum
variable {ι σ R A : Type*}
section HomogeneousDef
variable [Semiring A]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜]
variable (I : Ideal A)
/-- An `I : Ideal A` is homogeneous if for every `r ∈ I`, all homogeneous components
of `r` are in `I`. -/
def Ideal.IsHomogeneous : Prop :=
∀ (i : ι) ⦃r : A⦄, r ∈ I → (DirectSum.decompose 𝒜 r i : A) ∈ I
#align ideal.is_homogeneous Ideal.IsHomogeneous
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/HomogeneousIdeal.lean | 64 | 69 | theorem Ideal.IsHomogeneous.mem_iff {I} (hI : Ideal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 I) {x} :
x ∈ I ↔ ∀ i, (decompose 𝒜 x i : A) ∈ I := by |
classical
refine ⟨fun hx i ↦ hI i hx, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← DirectSum.sum_support_decompose 𝒜 x]
exact Ideal.sum_mem _ (fun i _ ↦ hx i)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Free.Coherence
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Monoidal
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.rigid.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3d7987cda72abc473c7cdbbb075170e9ac620042"
/-!
# Rigid (autonomous) monoidal categories
This file defines rigid (autonomous) monoidal categories and the necessary theory about
exact pairings and duals.
## Main definitions
* `ExactPairing` of two objects of a monoidal category
* Type classes `HasLeftDual` and `HasRightDual` that capture that a pairing exists
* The `rightAdjointMate f` as a morphism `fᘁ : Yᘁ ⟶ Xᘁ` for a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`
* The classes of `RightRigidCategory`, `LeftRigidCategory` and `RigidCategory`
## Main statements
* `comp_rightAdjointMate`: The adjoint mates of the composition is the composition of
adjoint mates.
## Notations
* `η_` and `ε_` denote the coevaluation and evaluation morphism of an exact pairing.
* `Xᘁ` and `ᘁX` denote the right and left dual of an object, as well as the adjoint
mate of a morphism.
## Future work
* Show that `X ⊗ Y` and `Yᘁ ⊗ Xᘁ` form an exact pairing.
* Show that the left adjoint mate of the right adjoint mate of a morphism is the morphism itself.
* Simplify constructions in the case where a symmetry or braiding is present.
* Show that `ᘁ` gives an equivalence of categories `C ≅ (Cᵒᵖ)ᴹᵒᵖ`.
* Define pivotal categories (rigid categories equipped with a natural isomorphism `ᘁᘁ ≅ 𝟙 C`).
## Notes
Although we construct the adjunction `tensorLeft Y ⊣ tensorLeft X` from `ExactPairing X Y`,
this is not a bijective correspondence.
I think the correct statement is that `tensorLeft Y` and `tensorLeft X` are
module endofunctors of `C` as a right `C` module category,
and `ExactPairing X Y` is in bijection with adjunctions compatible with this right `C` action.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/rigid+monoidal+category>
## Tags
rigid category, monoidal category
-/
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- An exact pairing is a pair of objects `X Y : C` which admit
a coevaluation and evaluation morphism which fulfill two triangle equalities. -/
class ExactPairing (X Y : C) where
/-- Coevaluation of an exact pairing.
Do not use directly. Use `ExactPairing.coevaluation` instead. -/
coevaluation' : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⊗ Y
/-- Evaluation of an exact pairing.
Do not use directly. Use `ExactPairing.evaluation` instead. -/
evaluation' : Y ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C
coevaluation_evaluation' :
Y ◁ coevaluation' ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ evaluation' ▷ Y = (ρ_ Y).hom ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
aesop_cat
evaluation_coevaluation' :
coevaluation' ▷ X ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ X ◁ evaluation' = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.exact_pairing CategoryTheory.ExactPairing
namespace ExactPairing
-- Porting note: as there is no mechanism equivalent to `[]` in Lean 3 to make
-- arguments for class fields explicit,
-- we now repeat all the fields without primes.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Making.20variable.20in.20class.20field.20explicit
variable (X Y : C)
variable [ExactPairing X Y]
/-- Coevaluation of an exact pairing. -/
def coevaluation : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⊗ Y := @coevaluation' _ _ _ X Y _
/-- Evaluation of an exact pairing. -/
def evaluation : Y ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C := @evaluation' _ _ _ X Y _
@[inherit_doc] notation "η_" => ExactPairing.coevaluation
@[inherit_doc] notation "ε_" => ExactPairing.evaluation
lemma coevaluation_evaluation :
Y ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ X _ ▷ Y = (ρ_ Y).hom ≫ (λ_ Y).inv :=
coevaluation_evaluation'
lemma evaluation_coevaluation :
η_ _ _ ▷ X ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ X ◁ ε_ _ Y = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv :=
evaluation_coevaluation'
lemma coevaluation_evaluation'' :
Y ◁ η_ X Y ⊗≫ ε_ X Y ▷ Y = ⊗𝟙 := by
convert coevaluation_evaluation X Y <;> simp [monoidalComp]
lemma evaluation_coevaluation'' :
η_ X Y ▷ X ⊗≫ X ◁ ε_ X Y = ⊗𝟙 := by
convert evaluation_coevaluation X Y <;> simp [monoidalComp]
end ExactPairing
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ExactPairing.coevaluation_evaluation
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ExactPairing.evaluation_coevaluation
instance exactPairingUnit : ExactPairing (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) where
coevaluation' := (ρ_ _).inv
evaluation' := (ρ_ _).hom
coevaluation_evaluation' := by rw [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]; coherence
evaluation_coevaluation' := by rw [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]; coherence
#align category_theory.exact_pairing_unit CategoryTheory.exactPairingUnit
/-- A class of objects which have a right dual. -/
class HasRightDual (X : C) where
/-- The right dual of the object `X`. -/
rightDual : C
[exact : ExactPairing X rightDual]
#align category_theory.has_right_dual CategoryTheory.HasRightDual
/-- A class of objects which have a left dual. -/
class HasLeftDual (Y : C) where
/-- The left dual of the object `X`. -/
leftDual : C
[exact : ExactPairing leftDual Y]
#align category_theory.has_left_dual CategoryTheory.HasLeftDual
attribute [instance] HasRightDual.exact
attribute [instance] HasLeftDual.exact
open ExactPairing HasRightDual HasLeftDual MonoidalCategory
@[inherit_doc] prefix:1024 "ᘁ" => leftDual
@[inherit_doc] postfix:1024 "ᘁ" => rightDual
instance hasRightDualUnit : HasRightDual (𝟙_ C) where
rightDual := 𝟙_ C
#align category_theory.has_right_dual_unit CategoryTheory.hasRightDualUnit
instance hasLeftDualUnit : HasLeftDual (𝟙_ C) where
leftDual := 𝟙_ C
#align category_theory.has_left_dual_unit CategoryTheory.hasLeftDualUnit
instance hasRightDualLeftDual {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : HasRightDual ᘁX where
rightDual := X
#align category_theory.has_right_dual_left_dual CategoryTheory.hasRightDualLeftDual
instance hasLeftDualRightDual {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : HasLeftDual Xᘁ where
leftDual := X
#align category_theory.has_left_dual_right_dual CategoryTheory.hasLeftDualRightDual
@[simp]
theorem leftDual_rightDual {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : ᘁXᘁ = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.left_dual_right_dual CategoryTheory.leftDual_rightDual
@[simp]
theorem rightDual_leftDual {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : (ᘁX)ᘁ = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.right_dual_left_dual CategoryTheory.rightDual_leftDual
/-- The right adjoint mate `fᘁ : Xᘁ ⟶ Yᘁ` of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def rightAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Yᘁ ⟶ Xᘁ :=
(ρ_ _).inv ≫ _ ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ _ ◁ f ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ _).hom
#align category_theory.right_adjoint_mate CategoryTheory.rightAdjointMate
/-- The left adjoint mate `ᘁf : ᘁY ⟶ ᘁX` of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def leftAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) : ᘁY ⟶ ᘁX :=
(λ_ _).inv ≫ η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ _ ≫ (_ ◁ f) ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom
#align category_theory.left_adjoint_mate CategoryTheory.leftAdjointMate
@[inherit_doc] notation f "ᘁ" => rightAdjointMate f
@[inherit_doc] notation "ᘁ" f => leftAdjointMate f
@[simp]
theorem rightAdjointMate_id {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : (𝟙 X)ᘁ = 𝟙 (Xᘁ) := by
simp [rightAdjointMate]
#align category_theory.right_adjoint_mate_id CategoryTheory.rightAdjointMate_id
@[simp]
theorem leftAdjointMate_id {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : (ᘁ(𝟙 X)) = 𝟙 (ᘁX) := by
simp [leftAdjointMate]
#align category_theory.left_adjoint_mate_id CategoryTheory.leftAdjointMate_id
theorem rightAdjointMate_comp {X Y Z : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : Xᘁ ⟶ Z} :
fᘁ ≫ g =
(ρ_ (Yᘁ)).inv ≫
_ ◁ η_ X (Xᘁ) ≫ _ ◁ (f ⊗ g) ≫ (α_ (Yᘁ) Y Z).inv ≫ ε_ Y (Yᘁ) ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ Z).hom :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ Yᘁ ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ≫ Yᘁ ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ (ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ g) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [rightAdjointMate]; coherence
_ = _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange, tensorHom_def]; coherence
#align category_theory.right_adjoint_mate_comp CategoryTheory.rightAdjointMate_comp
theorem leftAdjointMate_comp {X Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : (ᘁX) ⟶ Z} :
(ᘁf) ≫ g =
(λ_ _).inv ≫
η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ _ ≫ (g ⊗ f) ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ (ᘁY) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ▷ (ᘁY) ⊗≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ g ▷ 𝟙_ C) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [leftAdjointMate]; coherence
_ = _ := by
rw [whisker_exchange, tensorHom_def']; coherence
#align category_theory.left_adjoint_mate_comp CategoryTheory.leftAdjointMate_comp
/-- The composition of right adjoint mates is the adjoint mate of the composition. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_rightAdjointMate {X Y Z : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] [HasRightDual Z]
{f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g)ᘁ = gᘁ ≫ fᘁ := by
rw [rightAdjointMate_comp]
simp only [rightAdjointMate, comp_whiskerRight]
simp only [← Category.assoc]; congr 3; simp only [Category.assoc]
simp only [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]; congr 2
symm
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (Y ⊗ Yᘁ) ◁ η_ X Xᘁ) ⊗≫ Y ◁ Yᘁ ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫
Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [tensorHom_def']; coherence
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ (X ⊗ Xᘁ) ≫ (Y ⊗ Yᘁ) ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ) ⊗≫
Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ) ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ≫ f ▷ Xᘁ ≫ g ▷ Xᘁ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; coherence
#align category_theory.comp_right_adjoint_mate CategoryTheory.comp_rightAdjointMate
/-- The composition of left adjoint mates is the adjoint mate of the composition. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_leftAdjointMate {X Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] [HasLeftDual Z] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : Y ⟶ Z} : (ᘁf ≫ g) = (ᘁg) ≫ ᘁf := by
rw [leftAdjointMate_comp]
simp only [leftAdjointMate, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
simp only [← Category.assoc]; congr 3; simp only [Category.assoc]
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight]; congr 2
symm
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ ((𝟙_ C) ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ ((ᘁY) ⊗ Y)) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ▷ (ᘁY) ▷ Y ⊗≫
(ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [tensorHom_def]; coherence
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ⊗≫ (((ᘁX) ⊗ X) ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ f) ▷ ((ᘁY) ⊗ Y)) ⊗≫
(ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ⊗≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ f) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ (Y ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ⊗≫ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; coherence
#align category_theory.comp_left_adjoint_mate CategoryTheory.comp_leftAdjointMate
/-- Given an exact pairing on `Y Y'`,
we get a bijection on hom-sets `(Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z)`
by "pulling the string on the left" up or down.
This gives the adjunction `tensorLeftAdjunction Y Y' : tensorLeft Y' ⊣ tensorLeft Y`.
This adjunction is often referred to as "Frobenius reciprocity" in the
fusion categories / planar algebras / subfactors literature.
-/
def tensorLeftHomEquiv (X Y Y' Z : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : (Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z) where
toFun f := (λ_ _).inv ≫ η_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ f
invFun f := Y' ◁ f ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ _).hom
left_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ▷ X ⊗≫ ((Y' ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
coherence
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ▷ X ⊗≫ f := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = f := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; coherence
right_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Y' ▷ X ≫ (Y ⊗ Y') ◁ f) ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
coherence
_ = f ⊗≫ (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ▷ Z ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = f := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; coherence
#align category_theory.tensor_left_hom_equiv CategoryTheory.tensorLeftHomEquiv
/-- Given an exact pairing on `Y Y'`,
we get a bijection on hom-sets `(X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y')`
by "pulling the string on the right" up or down.
-/
def tensorRightHomEquiv (X Y Y' Z : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : (X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y') where
toFun f := (ρ_ _).inv ≫ _ ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ f ▷ _
invFun f := f ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom
left_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ X ◁ η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ (f ▷ (Y' ⊗ Y) ≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
coherence
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ X ◁ (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = f := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; coherence
right_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (X ◁ η_ Y Y' ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Y')) ⊗≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y' ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
coherence
_ = f ⊗≫ Z ◁ (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = f := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; coherence
#align category_theory.tensor_right_hom_equiv CategoryTheory.tensorRightHomEquiv
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_naturality {X Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z)
(g : Z ⟶ Z') :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z') (f ≫ g) = (tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z) f ≫ Y ◁ g := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]
#align category_theory.tensor_left_hom_equiv_naturality CategoryTheory.tensorLeftHomEquiv_naturality
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_naturality {X X' Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ X')
(g : X' ⟶ Y ⊗ Z) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm (f ≫ g) =
_ ◁ f ≫ (tensorLeftHomEquiv X' Y Y' Z).symm g := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]
#align category_theory.tensor_left_hom_equiv_symm_naturality CategoryTheory.tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_naturality
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_naturality {X Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z)
(g : Z ⟶ Z') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z') (f ≫ g) = (tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z) f ≫ g ▷ Y' := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv]
#align category_theory.tensor_right_hom_equiv_naturality CategoryTheory.tensorRightHomEquiv_naturality
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_naturality {X X' Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ X')
(g : X' ⟶ Z ⊗ Y') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm (f ≫ g) =
f ▷ Y ≫ (tensorRightHomEquiv X' Y Y' Z).symm g := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv]
#align category_theory.tensor_right_hom_equiv_symm_naturality CategoryTheory.tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_naturality
/-- If `Y Y'` have an exact pairing,
then the functor `tensorLeft Y'` is left adjoint to `tensorLeft Y`.
-/
def tensorLeftAdjunction (Y Y' : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : tensorLeft Y' ⊣ tensorLeft Y :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun X Z => tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z
homEquiv_naturality_left_symm := fun f g => tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_naturality f g
homEquiv_naturality_right := fun f g => tensorLeftHomEquiv_naturality f g }
#align category_theory.tensor_left_adjunction CategoryTheory.tensorLeftAdjunction
/-- If `Y Y'` have an exact pairing,
then the functor `tensor_right Y` is left adjoint to `tensor_right Y'`.
-/
def tensorRightAdjunction (Y Y' : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : tensorRight Y ⊣ tensorRight Y' :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun X Z => tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z
homEquiv_naturality_left_symm := fun f g => tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_naturality f g
homEquiv_naturality_right := fun f g => tensorRightHomEquiv_naturality f g }
#align category_theory.tensor_right_adjunction CategoryTheory.tensorRightAdjunction
/--
If `Y` has a left dual `ᘁY`, then it is a closed object, with the internal hom functor `Y ⟶[C] -`
given by left tensoring by `ᘁY`.
This has to be a definition rather than an instance to avoid diamonds, for example between
`category_theory.monoidal_closed.functor_closed` and
`CategoryTheory.Monoidal.functorHasLeftDual`. Moreover, in concrete applications there is often
a more useful definition of the internal hom object than `ᘁY ⊗ X`, in which case the closed
structure shouldn't come from `has_left_dual` (e.g. in the category `FinVect k`, it is more
convenient to define the internal hom as `Y →ₗ[k] X` rather than `ᘁY ⊗ X` even though these are
naturally isomorphic).
-/
def closedOfHasLeftDual (Y : C) [HasLeftDual Y] : Closed Y where
adj := tensorLeftAdjunction (ᘁY) Y
#align category_theory.closed_of_has_left_dual CategoryTheory.closedOfHasLeftDual
/-- `tensorLeftHomEquiv` commutes with tensoring on the right -/
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_tensor {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z)
(g : X' ⟶ Z') :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv (X ⊗ X') Y Y' (Z ⊗ Z')).symm ((f ⊗ g) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom) =
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm f ⊗ g) := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, tensorHom_def']
#align category_theory.tensor_left_hom_equiv_tensor CategoryTheory.tensorLeftHomEquiv_tensor
/-- `tensorRightHomEquiv` commutes with tensoring on the left -/
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_tensor {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y')
(g : X' ⟶ Z') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv (X' ⊗ X) Y Y' (Z' ⊗ Z)).symm ((g ⊗ f) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv) =
(α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (g ⊗ (tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm f) := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv, tensorHom_def]
#align category_theory.tensor_right_hom_equiv_tensor CategoryTheory.tensorRightHomEquiv_tensor
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerLeft {Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y']
(f : Y' ⟶ Z) : (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _).symm (η_ _ _ ≫ Y ◁ f) = (ρ_ _).hom ≫ f := by
calc
_ = Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ((Y' ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]; coherence
_ = (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = _ := by rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; coherence
#align category_theory.tensor_left_hom_equiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_id_tensor CategoryTheory.tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerLeft
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerRight {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X]
[HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _).symm (η_ _ _ ≫ f ▷ (Xᘁ)) = (ρ_ _).hom ≫ fᘁ := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, rightAdjointMate]
simp
#align category_theory.tensor_left_hom_equiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_tensor_id CategoryTheory.tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerRight
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X]
[HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(tensorRightHomEquiv _ (ᘁY) _ _).symm (η_ (ᘁX) X ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f) = (λ_ _).hom ≫ ᘁf := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv, leftAdjointMate]
simp
#align category_theory.tensor_right_hom_equiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_id_tensor CategoryTheory.tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerLeft
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerRight {Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y']
(f : Y ⟶ Z) : (tensorRightHomEquiv _ Y _ _).symm (η_ Y Y' ≫ f ▷ Y') = (λ_ _).hom ≫ f :=
calc
_ = η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ (f ▷ (Y' ⊗ Y) ≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv]; coherence
_ = (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = _ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; coherence
#align category_theory.tensor_right_hom_equiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_tensor_id CategoryTheory.tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerRight
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_whiskerLeft_comp_evaluation {Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual Z] (f : Y ⟶ ᘁZ) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (Z ◁ f ≫ ε_ _ _) = f ≫ (ρ_ _).inv :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ (ᘁZ) Z ▷ Y ≫ ((ᘁZ) ⊗ Z) ◁ f) ⊗≫ (ᘁZ) ◁ ε_ (ᘁZ) Z := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]; coherence
_ = f ⊗≫ (η_ (ᘁZ) Z ▷ (ᘁZ) ⊗≫ (ᘁZ) ◁ ε_ (ᘁZ) Z) := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = _ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; coherence
#align category_theory.tensor_left_hom_equiv_id_tensor_comp_evaluation CategoryTheory.tensorLeftHomEquiv_whiskerLeft_comp_evaluation
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_whiskerRight_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (f ▷ _ ≫ ε_ _ _) = (ᘁf) ≫ (ρ_ _).inv := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, leftAdjointMate]
simp
#align category_theory.tensor_left_hom_equiv_tensor_id_comp_evaluation CategoryTheory.tensorLeftHomEquiv_whiskerRight_comp_evaluation
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_whiskerLeft_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : (tensorRightHomEquiv _ _ _ _) ((Yᘁ) ◁ f ≫ ε_ _ _) = fᘁ ≫ (λ_ _).inv := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv, rightAdjointMate]
simp
#align category_theory.tensor_right_hom_equiv_id_tensor_comp_evaluation CategoryTheory.tensorRightHomEquiv_whiskerLeft_comp_evaluation
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_whiskerRight_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] (f : Y ⟶ Xᘁ) :
(tensorRightHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (f ▷ X ≫ ε_ X (Xᘁ)) = f ≫ (λ_ _).inv :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Y ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ≫ f ▷ (X ⊗ Xᘁ)) ⊗≫ ε_ X Xᘁ ▷ Xᘁ := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv]; coherence
_ = f ⊗≫ (Xᘁ ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ ε_ X Xᘁ ▷ Xᘁ) := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; coherence
_ = _ := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; coherence
#align category_theory.tensor_right_hom_equiv_tensor_id_comp_evaluation CategoryTheory.tensorRightHomEquiv_whiskerRight_comp_evaluation
-- Next four lemmas passing `fᘁ` or `ᘁf` through (co)evaluations.
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Rigid/Basic.lean | 489 | 492 | theorem coevaluation_comp_rightAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
η_ Y (Yᘁ) ≫ _ ◁ (fᘁ) = η_ _ _ ≫ f ▷ _ := by |
apply_fun (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ Y (Yᘁ) _).symm
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Quot
import Mathlib.Tactic.Cases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
import Mathlib.Tactic.MkIffOfInductiveProp
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
#align_import logic.relation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3365b20c2ffa7c35e47e5209b89ba9abdddf3ffe"
/-!
# Relation closures
This file defines the reflexive, transitive, and reflexive transitive closures of relations.
It also proves some basic results on definitions such as `EqvGen`.
Note that this is about unbundled relations, that is terms of types of the form `α → β → Prop`. For
the bundled version, see `Rel`.
## Definitions
* `Relation.ReflGen`: Reflexive closure. `ReflGen r` relates everything `r` related, plus for all
`a` it relates `a` with itself. So `ReflGen r a b ↔ r a b ∨ a = b`.
* `Relation.TransGen`: Transitive closure. `TransGen r` relates everything `r` related
transitively. So `TransGen r a b ↔ ∃ x₀ ... xₙ, r a x₀ ∧ r x₀ x₁ ∧ ... ∧ r xₙ b`.
* `Relation.ReflTransGen`: Reflexive transitive closure. `ReflTransGen r` relates everything
`r` related transitively, plus for all `a` it relates `a` with itself. So
`ReflTransGen r a b ↔ (∃ x₀ ... xₙ, r a x₀ ∧ r x₀ x₁ ∧ ... ∧ r xₙ b) ∨ a = b`. It is the same as
the reflexive closure of the transitive closure, or the transitive closure of the reflexive
closure. In terms of rewriting systems, this means that `a` can be rewritten to `b` in a number of
rewrites.
* `Relation.Comp`: Relation composition. We provide notation `∘r`. For `r : α → β → Prop` and
`s : β → γ → Prop`, `r ∘r s`relates `a : α` and `c : γ` iff there exists `b : β` that's related to
both.
* `Relation.Map`: Image of a relation under a pair of maps. For `r : α → β → Prop`, `f : α → γ`,
`g : β → δ`, `Map r f g` is the relation `γ → δ → Prop` relating `f a` and `g b` for all `a`, `b`
related by `r`.
* `Relation.Join`: Join of a relation. For `r : α → α → Prop`, `Join r a b ↔ ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c`. In
terms of rewriting systems, this means that `a` and `b` can be rewritten to the same term.
-/
open Function
variable {α β γ δ ε ζ : Type*}
section NeImp
variable {r : α → α → Prop}
theorem IsRefl.reflexive [IsRefl α r] : Reflexive r := fun x ↦ IsRefl.refl x
#align is_refl.reflexive IsRefl.reflexive
/-- To show a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
it suffices to show it holds when `x ≠ y`. -/
theorem Reflexive.rel_of_ne_imp (h : Reflexive r) {x y : α} (hr : x ≠ y → r x y) : r x y := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· exact hxy ▸ h x
· exact hr hxy
#align reflexive.rel_of_ne_imp Reflexive.rel_of_ne_imp
/-- If a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
then it holds whether or not `x ≠ y`. -/
theorem Reflexive.ne_imp_iff (h : Reflexive r) {x y : α} : x ≠ y → r x y ↔ r x y :=
⟨h.rel_of_ne_imp, fun hr _ ↦ hr⟩
#align reflexive.ne_imp_iff Reflexive.ne_imp_iff
/-- If a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
then it holds whether or not `x ≠ y`. Unlike `Reflexive.ne_imp_iff`, this uses `[IsRefl α r]`. -/
theorem reflexive_ne_imp_iff [IsRefl α r] {x y : α} : x ≠ y → r x y ↔ r x y :=
IsRefl.reflexive.ne_imp_iff
#align reflexive_ne_imp_iff reflexive_ne_imp_iff
protected theorem Symmetric.iff (H : Symmetric r) (x y : α) : r x y ↔ r y x :=
⟨fun h ↦ H h, fun h ↦ H h⟩
#align symmetric.iff Symmetric.iff
theorem Symmetric.flip_eq (h : Symmetric r) : flip r = r :=
funext₂ fun _ _ ↦ propext <| h.iff _ _
#align symmetric.flip_eq Symmetric.flip_eq
theorem Symmetric.swap_eq : Symmetric r → swap r = r :=
Symmetric.flip_eq
#align symmetric.swap_eq Symmetric.swap_eq
theorem flip_eq_iff : flip r = r ↔ Symmetric r :=
⟨fun h _ _ ↦ (congr_fun₂ h _ _).mp, Symmetric.flip_eq⟩
#align flip_eq_iff flip_eq_iff
theorem swap_eq_iff : swap r = r ↔ Symmetric r :=
flip_eq_iff
#align swap_eq_iff swap_eq_iff
end NeImp
section Comap
variable {r : β → β → Prop}
theorem Reflexive.comap (h : Reflexive r) (f : α → β) : Reflexive (r on f) := fun a ↦ h (f a)
#align reflexive.comap Reflexive.comap
theorem Symmetric.comap (h : Symmetric r) (f : α → β) : Symmetric (r on f) := fun _ _ hab ↦ h hab
#align symmetric.comap Symmetric.comap
theorem Transitive.comap (h : Transitive r) (f : α → β) : Transitive (r on f) :=
fun _ _ _ hab hbc ↦ h hab hbc
#align transitive.comap Transitive.comap
theorem Equivalence.comap (h : Equivalence r) (f : α → β) : Equivalence (r on f) :=
⟨h.reflexive.comap f, @(h.symmetric.comap f), @(h.transitive.comap f)⟩
#align equivalence.comap Equivalence.comap
end Comap
namespace Relation
section Comp
variable {r : α → β → Prop} {p : β → γ → Prop} {q : γ → δ → Prop}
/-- The composition of two relations, yielding a new relation. The result
relates a term of `α` and a term of `γ` if there is an intermediate
term of `β` related to both.
-/
def Comp (r : α → β → Prop) (p : β → γ → Prop) (a : α) (c : γ) : Prop :=
∃ b, r a b ∧ p b c
#align relation.comp Relation.Comp
@[inherit_doc]
local infixr:80 " ∘r " => Relation.Comp
theorem comp_eq : r ∘r (· = ·) = r :=
funext fun _ ↦ funext fun b ↦ propext <|
Iff.intro (fun ⟨_, h, Eq⟩ ↦ Eq ▸ h) fun h ↦ ⟨b, h, rfl⟩
#align relation.comp_eq Relation.comp_eq
theorem eq_comp : (· = ·) ∘r r = r :=
funext fun a ↦ funext fun _ ↦ propext <|
Iff.intro (fun ⟨_, Eq, h⟩ ↦ Eq.symm ▸ h) fun h ↦ ⟨a, rfl, h⟩
#align relation.eq_comp Relation.eq_comp
theorem iff_comp {r : Prop → α → Prop} : (· ↔ ·) ∘r r = r := by
have : (· ↔ ·) = (· = ·) := by funext a b; exact iff_eq_eq
rw [this, eq_comp]
#align relation.iff_comp Relation.iff_comp
theorem comp_iff {r : α → Prop → Prop} : r ∘r (· ↔ ·) = r := by
have : (· ↔ ·) = (· = ·) := by funext a b; exact iff_eq_eq
rw [this, comp_eq]
#align relation.comp_iff Relation.comp_iff
theorem comp_assoc : (r ∘r p) ∘r q = r ∘r p ∘r q := by
funext a d
apply propext
constructor
· exact fun ⟨c, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, hcd⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hab, c, hbc, hcd⟩
· exact fun ⟨b, hab, c, hbc, hcd⟩ ↦ ⟨c, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, hcd⟩
#align relation.comp_assoc Relation.comp_assoc
theorem flip_comp : flip (r ∘r p) = flip p ∘r flip r := by
funext c a
apply propext
constructor
· exact fun ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hbc, hab⟩
· exact fun ⟨b, hbc, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩
#align relation.flip_comp Relation.flip_comp
end Comp
section Fibration
variable (rα : α → α → Prop) (rβ : β → β → Prop) (f : α → β)
/-- A function `f : α → β` is a fibration between the relation `rα` and `rβ` if for all
`a : α` and `b : β`, whenever `b : β` and `f a` are related by `rβ`, `b` is the image
of some `a' : α` under `f`, and `a'` and `a` are related by `rα`. -/
def Fibration :=
∀ ⦃a b⦄, rβ b (f a) → ∃ a', rα a' a ∧ f a' = b
#align relation.fibration Relation.Fibration
variable {rα rβ}
/-- If `f : α → β` is a fibration between relations `rα` and `rβ`, and `a : α` is
accessible under `rα`, then `f a` is accessible under `rβ`. -/
theorem _root_.Acc.of_fibration (fib : Fibration rα rβ f) {a} (ha : Acc rα a) : Acc rβ (f a) := by
induction' ha with a _ ih
refine Acc.intro (f a) fun b hr ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a', hr', rfl⟩ := fib hr
exact ih a' hr'
#align acc.of_fibration Acc.of_fibration
theorem _root_.Acc.of_downward_closed (dc : ∀ {a b}, rβ b (f a) → ∃ c, f c = b) (a : α)
(ha : Acc (InvImage rβ f) a) : Acc rβ (f a) :=
ha.of_fibration f fun a _ h ↦
let ⟨a', he⟩ := dc h
-- Porting note: Lean 3 did not need the motive
⟨a', he.substr (p := fun x ↦ rβ x (f a)) h, he⟩
#align acc.of_downward_closed Acc.of_downward_closed
end Fibration
section Map
variable {r : α → β → Prop} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {c : γ} {d : δ}
/-- The map of a relation `r` through a pair of functions pushes the
relation to the codomains of the functions. The resulting relation is
defined by having pairs of terms related if they have preimages
related by `r`.
-/
protected def Map (r : α → β → Prop) (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : γ → δ → Prop := fun c d ↦
∃ a b, r a b ∧ f a = c ∧ g b = d
#align relation.map Relation.Map
lemma map_apply : Relation.Map r f g c d ↔ ∃ a b, r a b ∧ f a = c ∧ g b = d := Iff.rfl
#align relation.map_apply Relation.map_apply
@[simp] lemma map_map (r : α → β → Prop) (f₁ : α → γ) (g₁ : β → δ) (f₂ : γ → ε) (g₂ : δ → ζ) :
Relation.Map (Relation.Map r f₁ g₁) f₂ g₂ = Relation.Map r (f₂ ∘ f₁) (g₂ ∘ g₁) := by
ext a b
simp_rw [Relation.Map, Function.comp_apply, ← exists_and_right, @exists_comm γ, @exists_comm δ]
refine exists₂_congr fun a b ↦ ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨_, _, ⟨⟨h.1, rfl, rfl⟩, h.2⟩⟩⟩
rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨hab, rfl, rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨hab, h⟩
#align relation.map_map Relation.map_map
@[simp]
lemma map_apply_apply (hf : Injective f) (hg : Injective g) (r : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (b : β) :
Relation.Map r f g (f a) (g b) ↔ r a b := by simp [Relation.Map, hf.eq_iff, hg.eq_iff]
@[simp] lemma map_id_id (r : α → β → Prop) : Relation.Map r id id = r := by ext; simp [Relation.Map]
#align relation.map_id_id Relation.map_id_id
instance [Decidable (∃ a b, r a b ∧ f a = c ∧ g b = d)] : Decidable (Relation.Map r f g c d) :=
‹Decidable _›
end Map
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {a b c d : α}
/-- `ReflTransGen r`: reflexive transitive closure of `r` -/
@[mk_iff ReflTransGen.cases_tail_iff]
inductive ReflTransGen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : ReflTransGen r a a
| tail {b c} : ReflTransGen r a b → r b c → ReflTransGen r a c
#align relation.refl_trans_gen Relation.ReflTransGen
#align relation.refl_trans_gen.cases_tail_iff Relation.ReflTransGen.cases_tail_iff
attribute [refl] ReflTransGen.refl
/-- `ReflGen r`: reflexive closure of `r` -/
@[mk_iff]
inductive ReflGen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : ReflGen r a a
| single {b} : r a b → ReflGen r a b
#align relation.refl_gen Relation.ReflGen
#align relation.refl_gen_iff Relation.reflGen_iff
/-- `TransGen r`: transitive closure of `r` -/
@[mk_iff]
inductive TransGen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| single {b} : r a b → TransGen r a b
| tail {b c} : TransGen r a b → r b c → TransGen r a c
#align relation.trans_gen Relation.TransGen
#align relation.trans_gen_iff Relation.transGen_iff
attribute [refl] ReflGen.refl
namespace ReflGen
theorem to_reflTransGen : ∀ {a b}, ReflGen r a b → ReflTransGen r a b
| a, _, refl => by rfl
| a, b, single h => ReflTransGen.tail ReflTransGen.refl h
#align relation.refl_gen.to_refl_trans_gen Relation.ReflGen.to_reflTransGen
theorem mono {p : α → α → Prop} (hp : ∀ a b, r a b → p a b) : ∀ {a b}, ReflGen r a b → ReflGen p a b
| a, _, ReflGen.refl => by rfl
| a, b, single h => single (hp a b h)
#align relation.refl_gen.mono Relation.ReflGen.mono
instance : IsRefl α (ReflGen r) :=
⟨@refl α r⟩
end ReflGen
namespace ReflTransGen
@[trans]
theorem trans (hab : ReflTransGen r a b) (hbc : ReflTransGen r b c) : ReflTransGen r a c := by
induction hbc with
| refl => assumption
| tail _ hcd hac => exact hac.tail hcd
#align relation.refl_trans_gen.trans Relation.ReflTransGen.trans
theorem single (hab : r a b) : ReflTransGen r a b :=
refl.tail hab
#align relation.refl_trans_gen.single Relation.ReflTransGen.single
theorem head (hab : r a b) (hbc : ReflTransGen r b c) : ReflTransGen r a c := by
induction hbc with
| refl => exact refl.tail hab
| tail _ hcd hac => exact hac.tail hcd
#align relation.refl_trans_gen.head Relation.ReflTransGen.head
theorem symmetric (h : Symmetric r) : Symmetric (ReflTransGen r) := by
intro x y h
induction' h with z w _ b c
· rfl
· apply Relation.ReflTransGen.head (h b) c
#align relation.refl_trans_gen.symmetric Relation.ReflTransGen.symmetric
theorem cases_tail : ReflTransGen r a b → b = a ∨ ∃ c, ReflTransGen r a c ∧ r c b :=
(cases_tail_iff r a b).1
#align relation.refl_trans_gen.cases_tail Relation.ReflTransGen.cases_tail
@[elab_as_elim]
| Mathlib/Logic/Relation.lean | 324 | 332 | theorem head_induction_on {P : ∀ a : α, ReflTransGen r a b → Prop} {a : α} (h : ReflTransGen r a b)
(refl : P b refl)
(head : ∀ {a c} (h' : r a c) (h : ReflTransGen r c b), P c h → P a (h.head h')) : P a h := by |
induction h with
| refl => exact refl
| @tail b c _ hbc ih =>
apply ih
· exact head hbc _ refl
· exact fun h1 h2 ↦ head h1 (h2.tail hbc)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finite
/-!
# The rank nullity theorem
In this file we provide the rank nullity theorem as a typeclass, and prove various corollaries
of the theorem. The main definition is `HasRankNullity.{u} R`, which states that
1. Every `R`-module `M : Type u` has a linear independent subset of cardinality `Module.rank R M`.
2. `rank (M ⧸ N) + rank N = rank M` for every `R`-module `M : Type u` and every `N : Submodule R M`.
The following instances are provided in mathlib:
1. `DivisionRing.hasRankNullity` for division rings in `LinearAlgebra/Dimension/DivisionRing.lean`.
2. `IsDomain.hasRankNullity` for commutative domains in `LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Localization.lean`.
TODO: prove the rank-nullity theorem for `[Ring R] [IsDomain R] [StrongRankCondition R]`.
See `nonempty_oreSet_of_strongRankCondition` for a start.
-/
universe u v
open Function Set Cardinal
variable {R} {M M₁ M₂ M₃ : Type u} {M' : Type v} [Ring R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃] [AddCommGroup M']
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M']
/--
`HasRankNullity.{u}` is a class of rings satisfying
1. Every `R`-module `M : Type u` has a linear independent subset of cardinality `Module.rank R M`.
2. `rank (M ⧸ N) + rank N = rank M` for every `R`-module `M : Type u` and every `N : Submodule R M`.
Usually such a ring satisfies `HasRankNullity.{w}` for all universes `w`, and the universe
argument is there because of technical limitations to universe polymorphism.
See `DivisionRing.hasRankNullity` and `IsDomain.hasRankNullity`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasRankNullity (R : Type v) [inst : Ring R] : Prop where
exists_set_linearIndependent : ∀ (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M],
∃ s : Set M, #s = Module.rank R M ∧ LinearIndependent (ι := s) R Subtype.val
rank_quotient_add_rank : ∀ {M : Type u} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (N : Submodule R M),
Module.rank R (M ⧸ N) + Module.rank R N = Module.rank R M
variable [HasRankNullity.{u} R]
lemma rank_quotient_add_rank (N : Submodule R M) :
Module.rank R (M ⧸ N) + Module.rank R N = Module.rank R M :=
HasRankNullity.rank_quotient_add_rank N
#align rank_quotient_add_rank rank_quotient_add_rank
variable (R M) in
lemma exists_set_linearIndependent :
∃ s : Set M, #s = Module.rank R M ∧ LinearIndependent (ι := s) R Subtype.val :=
HasRankNullity.exists_set_linearIndependent M
variable (R) in
instance (priority := 100) : Nontrivial R := by
refine (subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun H ↦ ?_
have := rank_quotient_add_rank (R := R) (M := PUnit) ⊥
simp [one_add_one_eq_two] at this
theorem lift_rank_range_add_rank_ker (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
lift.{u} (Module.rank R (LinearMap.range f)) + lift.{v} (Module.rank R (LinearMap.ker f)) =
lift.{v} (Module.rank R M) := by
haveI := fun p : Submodule R M => Classical.decEq (M ⧸ p)
rw [← f.quotKerEquivRange.lift_rank_eq, ← lift_add, rank_quotient_add_rank]
/-- The **rank-nullity theorem** -/
theorem rank_range_add_rank_ker (f : M →ₗ[R] M₁) :
Module.rank R (LinearMap.range f) + Module.rank R (LinearMap.ker f) = Module.rank R M := by
haveI := fun p : Submodule R M => Classical.decEq (M ⧸ p)
rw [← f.quotKerEquivRange.rank_eq, rank_quotient_add_rank]
#align rank_range_add_rank_ker rank_range_add_rank_ker
theorem lift_rank_eq_of_surjective {f : M →ₗ[R] M'} (h : Surjective f) :
lift.{v} (Module.rank R M) =
lift.{u} (Module.rank R M') + lift.{v} (Module.rank R (LinearMap.ker f)) := by
rw [← lift_rank_range_add_rank_ker f, ← rank_range_of_surjective f h]
theorem rank_eq_of_surjective {f : M →ₗ[R] M₁} (h : Surjective f) :
Module.rank R M = Module.rank R M₁ + Module.rank R (LinearMap.ker f) := by
rw [← rank_range_add_rank_ker f, ← rank_range_of_surjective f h]
#align rank_eq_of_surjective rank_eq_of_surjective
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/RankNullity.lean | 91 | 109 | theorem exists_linearIndependent_of_lt_rank [StrongRankCondition R]
{s : Set M} (hs : LinearIndependent (ι := s) R Subtype.val) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ #t = Module.rank R M ∧ LinearIndependent (ι := t) R Subtype.val := by |
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := exists_set_linearIndependent R (M ⧸ Submodule.span R s)
choose sec hsec using Submodule.Quotient.mk_surjective (Submodule.span R s)
have hsec' : Submodule.Quotient.mk ∘ sec = id := funext hsec
have hst : Disjoint s (sec '' t) := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
rintro _ ⟨hxs, ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩⟩
apply ht'.ne_zero ⟨x, hxt⟩
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, ← hsec x, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero]
exact Submodule.subset_span hxs
refine ⟨s ∪ sec '' t, subset_union_left, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Cardinal.mk_union_of_disjoint hst, Cardinal.mk_image_eq, ht,
← rank_quotient_add_rank (Submodule.span R s), add_comm, rank_span_set hs]
exact HasLeftInverse.injective ⟨Submodule.Quotient.mk, hsec⟩
· apply LinearIndependent.union_of_quotient Submodule.subset_span hs
rwa [Function.comp, linearIndependent_image (hsec'.symm ▸ injective_id).injOn.image_of_comp,
← image_comp, hsec', image_id]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
#align_import probability.cond_count from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"117e93f82b5f959f8193857370109935291f0cc4"
/-!
# Classical probability
The classical formulation of probability states that the probability of an event occurring in a
finite probability space is the ratio of that event to all possible events.
This notion can be expressed with measure theory using
the counting measure. In particular, given the sets `s` and `t`, we define the probability of `t`
occurring in `s` to be `|s|⁻¹ * |s ∩ t|`. With this definition, we recover the probability over
the entire sample space when `s = Set.univ`.
Classical probability is often used in combinatorics and we prove some useful lemmas in this file
for that purpose.
## Main definition
* `ProbabilityTheory.condCount`: given a set `s`, `condCount s` is the counting measure
conditioned on `s`. This is a probability measure when `s` is finite and nonempty.
## Notes
The original aim of this file is to provide a measure theoretic method of describing the
probability an element of a set `s` satisfies some predicate `P`. Our current formulation still
allow us to describe this by abusing the definitional equality of sets and predicates by simply
writing `condCount s P`. We should avoid this however as none of the lemmas are written for
predicates.
-/
noncomputable section
open ProbabilityTheory
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- Given a set `s`, `condCount s` is the counting measure conditioned on `s`. In particular,
`condCount s t` is the proportion of `s` that is contained in `t`.
This is a probability measure when `s` is finite and nonempty and is given by
`ProbabilityTheory.condCount_isProbabilityMeasure`. -/
def condCount (s : Set Ω) : Measure Ω :=
Measure.count[|s]
#align probability_theory.cond_count ProbabilityTheory.condCount
@[simp]
theorem condCount_empty_meas : (condCount ∅ : Measure Ω) = 0 := by simp [condCount]
#align probability_theory.cond_count_empty_meas ProbabilityTheory.condCount_empty_meas
theorem condCount_empty {s : Set Ω} : condCount s ∅ = 0 := by simp
#align probability_theory.cond_count_empty ProbabilityTheory.condCount_empty
theorem finite_of_condCount_ne_zero {s t : Set Ω} (h : condCount s t ≠ 0) : s.Finite := by
by_contra hs'
simp [condCount, cond, Measure.count_apply_infinite hs'] at h
#align probability_theory.finite_of_cond_count_ne_zero ProbabilityTheory.finite_of_condCount_ne_zero
theorem condCount_univ [Fintype Ω] {s : Set Ω} :
condCount Set.univ s = Measure.count s / Fintype.card Ω := by
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, ← ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, Set.univ_inter]
congr
rw [← Finset.coe_univ, Measure.count_apply, Finset.univ.tsum_subtype' fun _ => (1 : ENNReal)]
· simp [Finset.card_univ]
· exact (@Finset.coe_univ Ω _).symm ▸ MeasurableSet.univ
#align probability_theory.cond_count_univ ProbabilityTheory.condCount_univ
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass Ω]
theorem condCount_isProbabilityMeasure {s : Set Ω} (hs : s.Finite) (hs' : s.Nonempty) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (condCount s) :=
{ measure_univ := by
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet, Set.inter_univ, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel]
· exact fun h => hs'.ne_empty <| Measure.empty_of_count_eq_zero h
· exact (Measure.count_apply_lt_top.2 hs).ne }
#align probability_theory.cond_count_is_probability_measure ProbabilityTheory.condCount_isProbabilityMeasure
theorem condCount_singleton (ω : Ω) (t : Set Ω) [Decidable (ω ∈ t)] :
condCount {ω} t = if ω ∈ t then 1 else 0 := by
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ (measurableSet_singleton ω), Measure.count_singleton, inv_one,
one_mul]
split_ifs
· rw [(by simpa : ({ω} : Set Ω) ∩ t = {ω}), Measure.count_singleton]
· rw [(by simpa : ({ω} : Set Ω) ∩ t = ∅), Measure.count_empty]
#align probability_theory.cond_count_singleton ProbabilityTheory.condCount_singleton
variable {s t u : Set Ω}
theorem condCount_inter_self (hs : s.Finite) : condCount s (s ∩ t) = condCount s t := by
rw [condCount, cond_inter_self _ hs.measurableSet]
#align probability_theory.cond_count_inter_self ProbabilityTheory.condCount_inter_self
theorem condCount_self (hs : s.Finite) (hs' : s.Nonempty) : condCount s s = 1 := by
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet, Set.inter_self, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel]
· exact fun h => hs'.ne_empty <| Measure.empty_of_count_eq_zero h
· exact (Measure.count_apply_lt_top.2 hs).ne
#align probability_theory.cond_count_self ProbabilityTheory.condCount_self
theorem condCount_eq_one_of (hs : s.Finite) (hs' : s.Nonempty) (ht : s ⊆ t) :
condCount s t = 1 := by
haveI := condCount_isProbabilityMeasure hs hs'
refine eq_of_le_of_not_lt prob_le_one ?_
rw [not_lt, ← condCount_self hs hs']
exact measure_mono ht
#align probability_theory.cond_count_eq_one_of ProbabilityTheory.condCount_eq_one_of
theorem pred_true_of_condCount_eq_one (h : condCount s t = 1) : s ⊆ t := by
have hsf := finite_of_condCount_ne_zero (by rw [h]; exact one_ne_zero)
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ hsf.measurableSet, mul_comm] at h
replace h := ENNReal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
rw [inv_inv, Measure.count_apply_finite _ hsf, Measure.count_apply_finite _ (hsf.inter_of_left _),
Nat.cast_inj] at h
suffices s ∩ t = s by exact this ▸ fun x hx => hx.2
rw [← @Set.Finite.toFinset_inj _ _ _ (hsf.inter_of_left _) hsf]
exact Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.Finite.toFinset_mono s.inter_subset_left) h.ge
#align probability_theory.pred_true_of_cond_count_eq_one ProbabilityTheory.pred_true_of_condCount_eq_one
theorem condCount_eq_zero_iff (hs : s.Finite) : condCount s t = 0 ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ := by
simp [condCount, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet, Measure.count_apply_eq_top, Set.not_infinite.2 hs,
Measure.count_apply_finite _ (hs.inter_of_left _)]
#align probability_theory.cond_count_eq_zero_iff ProbabilityTheory.condCount_eq_zero_iff
theorem condCount_of_univ (hs : s.Finite) (hs' : s.Nonempty) : condCount s Set.univ = 1 :=
condCount_eq_one_of hs hs' s.subset_univ
#align probability_theory.cond_count_of_univ ProbabilityTheory.condCount_of_univ
theorem condCount_inter (hs : s.Finite) :
condCount s (t ∩ u) = condCount (s ∩ t) u * condCount s t := by
by_cases hst : s ∩ t = ∅
· rw [hst, condCount_empty_meas, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, zero_mul,
condCount_eq_zero_iff hs, ← Set.inter_assoc, hst, Set.empty_inter]
rw [condCount, condCount, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet,
cond_apply _ (hs.inter_of_left _).measurableSet, mul_comm _ (Measure.count (s ∩ t)),
← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (Measure.count (s ∩ t)), ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, one_mul,
mul_comm, Set.inter_assoc]
· rwa [← Measure.count_eq_zero_iff] at hst
· exact (Measure.count_apply_lt_top.2 <| hs.inter_of_left _).ne
#align probability_theory.cond_count_inter ProbabilityTheory.condCount_inter
theorem condCount_inter' (hs : s.Finite) :
condCount s (t ∩ u) = condCount (s ∩ u) t * condCount s u := by
rw [← Set.inter_comm]
exact condCount_inter hs
#align probability_theory.cond_count_inter' ProbabilityTheory.condCount_inter'
theorem condCount_union (hs : s.Finite) (htu : Disjoint t u) :
condCount s (t ∪ u) = condCount s t + condCount s u := by
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet,
cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet, Set.inter_union_distrib_left, measure_union, mul_add]
exacts [htu.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right, (hs.inter_of_left _).measurableSet]
#align probability_theory.cond_count_union ProbabilityTheory.condCount_union
| Mathlib/Probability/CondCount.lean | 164 | 167 | theorem condCount_compl (t : Set Ω) (hs : s.Finite) (hs' : s.Nonempty) :
condCount s t + condCount s tᶜ = 1 := by |
rw [← condCount_union hs disjoint_compl_right, Set.union_compl_self,
(condCount_isProbabilityMeasure hs hs').measure_univ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import algebra.group_with_zero.units.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df5e9937a06fdd349fc60106f54b84d47b1434f0"
/-!
# Lemmas about units in a `MonoidWithZero` or a `GroupWithZero`.
We also define `Ring.inverse`, a globally defined function on any ring
(in fact any `MonoidWithZero`), which inverts units and sends non-units to zero.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists Multiplicative
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {α M₀ G₀ M₀' G₀' F F' : Type*}
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
namespace Units
/-- An element of the unit group of a nonzero monoid with zero represented as an element
of the monoid is nonzero. -/
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] (u : M₀ˣ) : (u : M₀) ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one u.mul_inv
#align units.ne_zero Units.ne_zero
-- We can't use `mul_eq_zero` + `Units.ne_zero` in the next two lemmas because we don't assume
-- `Nonzero M₀`.
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : a * u = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_left h ↑u⁻¹, fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h u⟩
#align units.mul_left_eq_zero Units.mul_left_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : ↑u * a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_right (↑u⁻¹) h, mul_eq_zero_of_right (u : M₀)⟩
#align units.mul_right_eq_zero Units.mul_right_eq_zero
end Units
namespace IsUnit
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] {a : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.ne_zero
#align is_unit.ne_zero IsUnit.ne_zero
theorem mul_right_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a * b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.mul_right_eq_zero
#align is_unit.mul_right_eq_zero IsUnit.mul_right_eq_zero
theorem mul_left_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (hb : IsUnit b) : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hb
hu ▸ u.mul_left_eq_zero
#align is_unit.mul_left_eq_zero IsUnit.mul_left_eq_zero
end IsUnit
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_zero_iff : IsUnit (0 : M₀) ↔ (0 : M₀) = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, a, (a0 : 0 * a = 1), _⟩, rfl⟩ => by rwa [zero_mul] at a0, fun h =>
@isUnit_of_subsingleton _ _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) 0⟩
#align is_unit_zero_iff isUnit_zero_iff
-- Porting note: removed `simp` tag because `simpNF` says it's redundant
theorem not_isUnit_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : ¬IsUnit (0 : M₀) :=
mt isUnit_zero_iff.1 zero_ne_one
#align not_is_unit_zero not_isUnit_zero
namespace Ring
open scoped Classical
/-- Introduce a function `inverse` on a monoid with zero `M₀`, which sends `x` to `x⁻¹` if `x` is
invertible and to `0` otherwise. This definition is somewhat ad hoc, but one needs a fully (rather
than partially) defined inverse function for some purposes, including for calculus.
Note that while this is in the `Ring` namespace for brevity, it requires the weaker assumption
`MonoidWithZero M₀` instead of `Ring M₀`. -/
noncomputable def inverse : M₀ → M₀ := fun x => if h : IsUnit x then ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) else 0
#align ring.inverse Ring.inverse
/-- By definition, if `x` is invertible then `inverse x = x⁻¹`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_unit (u : M₀ˣ) : inverse (u : M₀) = (u⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) := by
rw [inverse, dif_pos u.isUnit, IsUnit.unit_of_val_units]
#align ring.inverse_unit Ring.inverse_unit
/-- By definition, if `x` is not invertible then `inverse x = 0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_non_unit (x : M₀) (h : ¬IsUnit x) : inverse x = 0 :=
dif_neg h
#align ring.inverse_non_unit Ring.inverse_non_unit
theorem mul_inverse_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * inverse x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.mul_inv]
#align ring.mul_inverse_cancel Ring.mul_inverse_cancel
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Units/Basic.lean | 113 | 115 | theorem inverse_mul_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * x = 1 := by |
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.inv_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π
#align complex.arg Complex.arg
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / abs x := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg,
Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1 (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2,
Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
#align complex.sin_arg Complex.sin_arg
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / abs x := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (abs.pos hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
#align complex.cos_arg Complex.cos_arg
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 54 | 58 | theorem abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ↑(abs x) * exp (arg x * I) = x := by |
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : abs x ≠ 0 := abs.ne_zero hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm (abs x)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
#align_import data.set.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file defines the product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i` along with the diagonal of a
type.
## Main declarations
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun _ => And.decidable
#align set.decidable_mem_prod Set.decidableMemProd
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
#align set.prod_mono Set.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
#align set.prod_mono_left Set.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
#align set.prod_mono_right Set.prod_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
#align set.prod_self_subset_prod_self Set.prod_self_subset_prod_self
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
#align set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self Set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
#align set.prod_subset_iff Set.prod_subset_iff
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
#align set.forall_prod_set Set.forall_prod_set
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
#align set.exists_prod_set Set.exists_prod_set
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact and_false_iff _
#align set.prod_empty Set.prod_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_prod Set.empty_prod
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact true_and_iff _
#align set.univ_prod_univ Set.univ_prod_univ
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.univ_prod Set.univ_prod
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.prod_univ Set.prod_univ
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.singleton_prod Set.singleton_prod
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 117 | 119 | theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by |
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3fb84046afd187b710170887195d50bada934ee"
/-!
# The derivative of a linear equivalence
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
continuous linear equivalences.
We also prove the usual formula for the derivative of the inverse function, assuming it exists.
The inverse function theorem is in `Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/InverseFunctionTheorem/FDeriv.lean`.
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter Asymptotics ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_strict_fderiv_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_within_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAtFilter
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_within_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
#align continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.fderivWithin hxs
#align continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.fderivWithin
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiable
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_on ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine
⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f) s x :=
iso.symm.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H
rwa [← Function.comp.assoc iso.symm iso f, iso.symm_comp_self] at this
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← differentiableWithinAt_univ,
iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
rw [DifferentiableOn, DifferentiableOn]
simp only [iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
rw [← differentiableOn_univ, ← differentiableOn_univ]
exact iso.comp_differentiableOn_iff
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H⟩
have A : f = iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f := by
rw [← Function.comp.assoc, iso.symm_comp_self]
rfl
have B : f' = (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
rw [A, B]
exact iso.symm.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H⟩
convert iso.symm.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H using 1 <;>
ext z <;> apply (iso.symm_apply_apply _).symm
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x := by
rw [← iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm,
ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff']
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· rw [fderiv.comp_fderivWithin x iso.differentiableAt h hxs, iso.fderiv]
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x := mt iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_zero]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ]
exact iso.comp_fderivWithin uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv
lemma _root_.fderivWithin_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G))
(hs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) s x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
change fderivWithin 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) s x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ hs]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) (x : E) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
change fderiv 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp' (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) =
fun x ↦ (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
ext x : 1
exact fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp L f x
theorem comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.differentiableWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 ((f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.differentiableWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, iso.self_comp_symm] at this
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiableAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f (iso x) := by
simp only [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff,
preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiableOn_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
refine ⟨fun H y hy => ?_, fun H y hy => iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.2 (H _ hy)⟩
rw [← iso.apply_symm_apply y, ← comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
apply H
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiable_iff {f : F → G} :
Differentiable 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [← differentiableOn_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff, preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.hasFDerivWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
have A : f = (f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm := by
rw [Function.comp.assoc, iso.self_comp_symm]
rfl
have B : f' = (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)).comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
rw [A, B]
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.hasFDerivWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) f' (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc,
iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff', preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_right_fderivWithin {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E}
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ⁻¹' s) x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 f s (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x)
· exact (iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff.2 h.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x := by
intro h'
exact h (iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h')
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderivWithin
theorem comp_right_fderiv {f : F → G} {x : E} :
fderiv 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x = (fderiv 𝕜 f (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ, ← iso.comp_right_fderivWithin, preimage_univ]
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderiv
end ContinuousLinearEquiv
namespace LinearIsometryEquiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear isometry equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasStrictFDerivAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.has_strict_fderiv_at LinearIsometryEquiv.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivWithinAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.has_fderiv_within_at LinearIsometryEquiv.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.has_fderiv_at LinearIsometryEquiv.hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.differentiable_at LinearIsometryEquiv.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.differentiable_within_at LinearIsometryEquiv.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
#align linear_isometry_equiv.fderiv LinearIsometryEquiv.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).fderivWithin hxs
#align linear_isometry_equiv.fderiv_within LinearIsometryEquiv.fderivWithin
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.differentiable LinearIsometryEquiv.differentiable
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
#align linear_isometry_equiv.differentiable_on LinearIsometryEquiv.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_differentiable_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableOn_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_differentiable_on_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiable_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_differentiable_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff' LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_fderivWithin hxs
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_fderiv_within LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderivWithin
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_fderiv
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_fderiv LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderiv
theorem comp_fderiv' {f : G → E} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) = fun x ↦ (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
ext x : 1
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderiv iso
end LinearIsometryEquiv
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in some neighborhood of `a`, `g` is continuous at `a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `g a` in the strict sense, then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`
in the strict sense.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have an
inverse function. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.of_local_left_inverse {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {g : F → E} {a : F}
(hg : ContinuousAt g a) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (g a))
(hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f (g y) = y) : HasStrictFDerivAt g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a := by
replace hg := hg.prod_map' hg
replace hfg := hfg.prod_mk_nhds hfg
have :
(fun p : F × F => g p.1 - g p.2 - f'.symm (p.1 - p.2)) =O[𝓝 (a, a)] fun p : F × F =>
f' (g p.1 - g p.2) - (p.1 - p.2) := by
refine ((f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).isBigO_comp _ _).congr (fun x => ?_) fun _ => rfl
simp
refine this.trans_isLittleO ?_
clear this
refine ((hf.comp_tendsto hg).symm.congr'
(hfg.mono ?_) (eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl)).trans_isBigO ?_
· rintro p ⟨hp1, hp2⟩
simp [hp1, hp2]
· refine (hf.isBigO_sub_rev.comp_tendsto hg).congr' (eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl)
(hfg.mono ?_)
rintro p ⟨hp1, hp2⟩
simp only [(· ∘ ·), hp1, hp2]
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.of_local_left_inverse HasStrictFDerivAt.of_local_left_inverse
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in some neighborhood of `a`, `g` is continuous at `a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `g a`, then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.of_local_left_inverse {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {g : F → E} {a : F}
(hg : ContinuousAt g a) (hf : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (g a))
(hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f (g y) = y) : HasFDerivAt g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a := by
have : (fun x : F => g x - g a - f'.symm (x - a)) =O[𝓝 a]
fun x : F => f' (g x - g a) - (x - a) := by
refine ((f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).isBigO_comp _ _).congr (fun x => ?_) fun _ => rfl
simp
refine HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO <| this.trans_isLittleO ?_
clear this
refine ((hf.isLittleO.comp_tendsto hg).symm.congr' (hfg.mono ?_) .rfl).trans_isBigO ?_
· intro p hp
simp [hp, hfg.self_of_nhds]
· refine ((hf.isBigO_sub_rev f'.antilipschitz).comp_tendsto hg).congr'
(eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl) (hfg.mono ?_)
rintro p hp
simp only [(· ∘ ·), hp, hfg.self_of_nhds]
#align has_fderiv_at.of_local_left_inverse HasFDerivAt.of_local_left_inverse
/-- If `f` is a partial homeomorphism defined on a neighbourhood of `f.symm a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` in the sense of strict differentiability at `f.symm a`, then `f.symm` has
the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem PartialHomeomorph.hasStrictFDerivAt_symm (f : PartialHomeomorph E F) {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F}
{a : F} (ha : a ∈ f.target) (htff' : HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (f.symm a)) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f.symm (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a :=
htff'.of_local_left_inverse (f.symm.continuousAt ha) (f.eventually_right_inverse ha)
#align local_homeomorph.has_strict_fderiv_at_symm PartialHomeomorph.hasStrictFDerivAt_symm
/-- If `f` is a partial homeomorphism defined on a neighbourhood of `f.symm a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `f.symm a`, then `f.symm` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem PartialHomeomorph.hasFDerivAt_symm (f : PartialHomeomorph E F) {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {a : F}
(ha : a ∈ f.target) (htff' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (f.symm a)) :
HasFDerivAt f.symm (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a :=
htff'.of_local_left_inverse (f.symm.continuousAt ha) (f.eventually_right_inverse ha)
#align local_homeomorph.has_fderiv_at_symm PartialHomeomorph.hasFDerivAt_symm
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.eventually_ne (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hf' : ∃ C, ∀ z, ‖z‖ ≤ C * ‖f' z‖) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[s \ {x}] x, f z ≠ f x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, eventually_inf_principal]
have A : (fun z => z - x) =O[𝓝[s] x] fun z => f' (z - x) :=
isBigO_iff.2 <| hf'.imp fun C hC => eventually_of_forall fun z => hC _
have : (fun z => f z - f x) ~[𝓝[s] x] fun z => f' (z - x) := h.isLittleO.trans_isBigO A
simpa [not_imp_not, sub_eq_zero] using (A.trans this.isBigO_symm).eq_zero_imp
#align has_fderiv_within_at.eventually_ne HasFDerivWithinAt.eventually_ne
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Equiv.lean | 468 | 470 | theorem HasFDerivAt.eventually_ne (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hf' : ∃ C, ∀ z, ‖z‖ ≤ C * ‖f' z‖) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] x, f z ≠ f x := by |
simpa only [compl_eq_univ_diff] using (hasFDerivWithinAt_univ.2 h).eventually_ne hf'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Geoffrey Irving. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Geoffrey Irving
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
/-!
# Various complex special functions are analytic
`exp`, `log`, and `cpow` are analytic, since they are differentiable.
-/
open Complex Set
open scoped Topology
variable {E : Type} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
variable {f g : E → ℂ} {z : ℂ} {x : E} {s : Set E}
/-- `exp` is entire -/
theorem analyticOn_cexp : AnalyticOn ℂ exp univ := by
rw [analyticOn_univ_iff_differentiable]; exact differentiable_exp
/-- `exp` is analytic at any point -/
theorem analyticAt_cexp : AnalyticAt ℂ exp z :=
analyticOn_cexp z (mem_univ _)
/-- `exp ∘ f` is analytic -/
theorem AnalyticAt.cexp (fa : AnalyticAt ℂ f x) : AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z ↦ exp (f z)) x :=
analyticAt_cexp.comp fa
/-- `exp ∘ f` is analytic -/
theorem AnalyticOn.cexp (fs : AnalyticOn ℂ f s) : AnalyticOn ℂ (fun z ↦ exp (f z)) s :=
fun z n ↦ analyticAt_cexp.comp (fs z n)
/-- `log` is analytic away from nonpositive reals -/
theorem analyticAt_clog (m : z ∈ slitPlane) : AnalyticAt ℂ log z := by
rw [analyticAt_iff_eventually_differentiableAt]
filter_upwards [isOpen_slitPlane.eventually_mem m]
intro z m
exact differentiableAt_id.clog m
/-- `log` is analytic away from nonpositive reals -/
theorem AnalyticAt.clog (fa : AnalyticAt ℂ f x) (m : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z ↦ log (f z)) x :=
(analyticAt_clog m).comp fa
/-- `log` is analytic away from nonpositive reals -/
theorem AnalyticOn.clog (fs : AnalyticOn ℂ f s) (m : ∀ z ∈ s, f z ∈ slitPlane) :
AnalyticOn ℂ (fun z ↦ log (f z)) s :=
fun z n ↦ (analyticAt_clog (m z n)).comp (fs z n)
/-- `f z ^ g z` is analytic if `f z` is not a nonpositive real -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Analytic.lean | 57 | 64 | theorem AnalyticAt.cpow (fa : AnalyticAt ℂ f x) (ga : AnalyticAt ℂ g x)
(m : f x ∈ slitPlane) : AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z ↦ f z ^ g z) x := by |
have e : (fun z ↦ f z ^ g z) =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun z ↦ exp (log (f z) * g z) := by
filter_upwards [(fa.continuousAt.eventually_ne (slitPlane_ne_zero m))]
intro z fz
simp only [fz, cpow_def, if_false]
rw [analyticAt_congr e]
exact ((fa.clog m).mul ga).cexp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LocallyConvex
#align_import analysis.locally_convex.with_seminorms from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b31173ee05c911d61ad6a05bd2196835c932e0ec"
/-!
# Topology induced by a family of seminorms
## Main definitions
* `SeminormFamily.basisSets`: The set of open seminorm balls for a family of seminorms.
* `SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis`: A module filter basis formed by the open balls.
* `Seminorm.IsBounded`: A linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is bounded iff every seminorm in `F` can be
bounded by a finite number of seminorms in `E`.
## Main statements
* `WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace`: A space equipped with a family of seminorms is locally
convex.
* `WithSeminorms.firstCountable`: A space is first countable if it's topology is induced by a
countable family of seminorms.
## Continuity of semilinear maps
If `E` and `F` are topological vector space with the topology induced by a family of seminorms, then
we have a direct method to prove that a linear map is continuous:
* `Seminorm.continuous_from_bounded`: A bounded linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is continuous.
If the topology of a space `E` is induced by a family of seminorms, then we can characterize von
Neumann boundedness in terms of that seminorm family. Together with
`LinearMap.continuous_of_locally_bounded` this gives general criterion for continuity.
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex
-/
open NormedField Set Seminorm TopologicalSpace Filter List
open NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕝 𝕝₂ E F G ι ι' : Type*}
section FilterBasis
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable (𝕜 E ι)
/-- An abbreviation for indexed families of seminorms. This is mainly to allow for dot-notation. -/
abbrev SeminormFamily :=
ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E
#align seminorm_family SeminormFamily
variable {𝕜 E ι}
namespace SeminormFamily
/-- The sets of a filter basis for the neighborhood filter of 0. -/
def basisSets (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : Set (Set E) :=
⋃ (s : Finset ι) (r) (_ : 0 < r), singleton (ball (s.sup p) (0 : E) r)
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets SeminormFamily.basisSets
variable (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
theorem basisSets_iff {U : Set E} :
U ∈ p.basisSets ↔ ∃ (i : Finset ι) (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ U = ball (i.sup p) 0 r := by
simp only [basisSets, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_singleton_iff]
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_iff SeminormFamily.basisSets_iff
theorem basisSets_mem (i : Finset ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (i.sup p).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨i, _, hr, rfl⟩
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_mem SeminormFamily.basisSets_mem
theorem basisSets_singleton_mem (i : ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (p i).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨{i}, _, hr, by rw [Finset.sup_singleton]⟩
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_singleton_mem SeminormFamily.basisSets_singleton_mem
theorem basisSets_nonempty [Nonempty ι] : p.basisSets.Nonempty := by
let i := Classical.arbitrary ι
refine nonempty_def.mpr ⟨(p i).ball 0 1, ?_⟩
exact p.basisSets_singleton_mem i zero_lt_one
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_nonempty SeminormFamily.basisSets_nonempty
theorem basisSets_intersect (U V : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) (hV : V ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ z ∈ p.basisSets, z ⊆ U ∩ V := by
classical
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r₁, hr₁, hU⟩
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hV with ⟨t, r₂, hr₂, hV⟩
use ((s ∪ t).sup p).ball 0 (min r₁ r₂)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem (s ∪ t) (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩), ?_⟩
rw [hU, hV, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩),
ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₁, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₂]
exact
Set.subset_inter
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_left hi, ball_mono <| min_le_left _ _⟩)
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_right hi, ball_mono <| min_le_right _ _⟩)
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_intersect SeminormFamily.basisSets_intersect
theorem basisSets_zero (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : (0 : E) ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨ι', r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, mem_ball_zero, map_zero]
exact hr
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_zero SeminormFamily.basisSets_zero
theorem basisSets_add (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V + V ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / 2)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr zero_lt_two), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_add_ball_subset (s.sup p) (r / 2) (r / 2) 0 0) ?_
rw [hU, add_zero, add_halves']
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_add SeminormFamily.basisSets_add
theorem basisSets_neg (U) (hU' : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V ⊆ (fun x : E => -x) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU' with ⟨s, r, _, hU⟩
rw [hU, neg_preimage, neg_ball (s.sup p), neg_zero]
exact ⟨U, hU', Eq.subset hU⟩
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_neg SeminormFamily.basisSets_neg
/-- The `addGroupFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def addGroupFilterBasis [Nonempty ι] : AddGroupFilterBasis E :=
addGroupFilterBasisOfComm p.basisSets p.basisSets_nonempty p.basisSets_intersect p.basisSets_zero
p.basisSets_add p.basisSets_neg
#align seminorm_family.add_group_filter_basis SeminormFamily.addGroupFilterBasis
theorem basisSets_smul_right (v : E) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∀ᶠ x : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x • v ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, Filter.eventually_iff]
simp_rw [(s.sup p).mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h : 0 < (s.sup p) v
· simp_rw [(lt_div_iff h).symm]
rw [← _root_.ball_zero_eq]
exact Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (div_pos hr h)
simp_rw [le_antisymm (not_lt.mp h) (apply_nonneg _ v), mul_zero, hr]
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_univ (mem_univ 0)
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_smul_right SeminormFamily.basisSets_smul_right
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem basisSets_smul (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜), ∃ W ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V • W ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
refine ⟨Metric.ball 0 √r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 √r, p.basisSets_mem s (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_smul_ball (s.sup p) √r √r) ?_
rw [hU, Real.mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt hr)]
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_smul SeminormFamily.basisSets_smul
theorem basisSets_smul_left (x : 𝕜) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V ⊆ (fun y : E => x • y) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU]
by_cases h : x ≠ 0
· rw [(s.sup p).smul_ball_preimage 0 r x h, smul_zero]
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / ‖x‖)
exact ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h)), Subset.rfl⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 r, p.basisSets_mem s hr, ?_⟩
simp only [not_ne_iff.mp h, Set.subset_def, mem_ball_zero, hr, mem_univ, map_zero, imp_true_iff,
preimage_const_of_mem, zero_smul]
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_smul_left SeminormFamily.basisSets_smul_left
/-- The `moduleFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def moduleFilterBasis : ModuleFilterBasis 𝕜 E where
toAddGroupFilterBasis := p.addGroupFilterBasis
smul' := p.basisSets_smul _
smul_left' := p.basisSets_smul_left
smul_right' := p.basisSets_smul_right
#align seminorm_family.module_filter_basis SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis
theorem filter_eq_iInf (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.filter = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i => ?_) ?_
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.le_basis_iff
(Metric.nhds_basis_ball.comap _)]
intro ε hε
refine ⟨(p i).ball 0 ε, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← (Finset.sup_singleton : _ = p i)]
exact p.basisSets_mem {i} hε
· rw [id, (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball]
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.ge_iff]
rintro U (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets)
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [id, Seminorm.ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, s.iInter_mem_sets]
exact fun i _ =>
Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem i
⟨Metric.ball 0 r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 hr,
Eq.subset (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball.symm⟩
#align seminorm_family.filter_eq_infi SeminormFamily.filter_eq_iInf
end SeminormFamily
end FilterBasis
section Bounded
namespace Seminorm
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
-- Todo: This should be phrased entirely in terms of the von Neumann bornology.
/-- The proposition that a linear map is bounded between spaces with families of seminorms. -/
def IsBounded (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : Prop :=
∀ i, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p
#align seminorm.is_bounded Seminorm.IsBounded
theorem isBounded_const (ι' : Type*) [Nonempty ι'] {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
IsBounded p (fun _ : ι' => q) f ↔ ∃ (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0), q.comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
simp only [IsBounded, forall_const]
#align seminorm.is_bounded_const Seminorm.isBounded_const
theorem const_isBounded (ι : Type*) [Nonempty ι] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : IsBounded (fun _ : ι => p) q f ↔ ∀ i, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • p := by
constructor <;> intro h i
· rcases h i with ⟨s, C, h⟩
exact ⟨C, le_trans h (smul_le_smul (Finset.sup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl) le_rfl)⟩
use {Classical.arbitrary ι}
simp only [h, Finset.sup_singleton]
#align seminorm.const_is_bounded Seminorm.const_isBounded
theorem isBounded_sup {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F} {f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F}
(hf : IsBounded p q f) (s' : Finset ι') :
∃ (C : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset ι), (s'.sup q).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
classical
obtain rfl | _ := s'.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨1, ∅, by simp [Seminorm.bot_eq_zero]⟩
choose fₛ fC hf using hf
use s'.card • s'.sup fC, Finset.biUnion s' fₛ
have hs : ∀ i : ι', i ∈ s' → (q i).comp f ≤ s'.sup fC • (Finset.biUnion s' fₛ).sup p := by
intro i hi
refine (hf i).trans (smul_le_smul ?_ (Finset.le_sup hi))
exact Finset.sup_mono (Finset.subset_biUnion_of_mem fₛ hi)
refine (comp_mono f (finset_sup_le_sum q s')).trans ?_
simp_rw [← pullback_apply, map_sum, pullback_apply]
refine (Finset.sum_le_sum hs).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sum_const, smul_assoc]
#align seminorm.is_bounded_sup Seminorm.isBounded_sup
end Seminorm
end Bounded
section Topology
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι]
/-- The proposition that the topology of `E` is induced by a family of seminorms `p`. -/
structure WithSeminorms (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) [topology : TopologicalSpace E] : Prop where
topology_eq_withSeminorms : topology = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology
#align with_seminorms WithSeminorms
theorem WithSeminorms.withSeminorms_eq {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} [t : TopologicalSpace E]
(hp : WithSeminorms p) : t = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology :=
hp.1
#align with_seminorms.with_seminorms_eq WithSeminorms.withSeminorms_eq
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
theorem WithSeminorms.topologicalAddGroup (hp : WithSeminorms p) : TopologicalAddGroup E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup _
#align with_seminorms.topological_add_group WithSeminorms.topologicalAddGroup
theorem WithSeminorms.continuousSMul (hp : WithSeminorms p) : ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact ModuleFilterBasis.continuousSMul _
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun s : Set E => s ∈ p.basisSets) id := by
rw [congr_fun (congr_arg (@nhds E) hp.1) 0]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis _
#align with_seminorms.has_basis WithSeminorms.hasBasis
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_zero_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball 0 sr.2 := by
refine ⟨fun V => ?_⟩
simp only [hp.hasBasis.mem_iff, SeminormFamily.basisSets_iff, Prod.exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
exact ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
· rintro ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
#align with_seminorms.has_basis_zero_ball WithSeminorms.hasBasis_zero_ball
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) {x : E} :
(𝓝 (x : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball x sr.2 := by
have : TopologicalAddGroup E := hp.topologicalAddGroup
rw [← map_add_left_nhds_zero]
convert hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.map (x + ·) using 1
ext sr : 1
-- Porting note: extra type ascriptions needed on `0`
have : (sr.fst.sup p).ball (x +ᵥ (0 : E)) sr.snd = x +ᵥ (sr.fst.sup p).ball 0 sr.snd :=
Eq.symm (Seminorm.vadd_ball (sr.fst.sup p))
rwa [vadd_eq_add, add_zero] at this
#align with_seminorms.has_basis_ball WithSeminorms.hasBasis_ball
/-- The `x`-neighbourhoods of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around `x`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (U : Set E) :
U ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
rw [hp.hasBasis_ball.mem_iff, Prod.exists]
#align with_seminorms.mem_nhds_iff WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff
/-- The open sets of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around all of their points. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.isOpen_iff_mem_balls (hp : WithSeminorms p) (U : Set E) :
IsOpen U ↔ ∀ x ∈ U, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
simp_rw [← WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff hp _ U, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
#align with_seminorms.is_open_iff_mem_balls WithSeminorms.isOpen_iff_mem_balls
/- Note that through the following lemmas, one also immediately has that separating families
of seminorms induce T₂ and T₃ topologies by `TopologicalAddGroup.t2Space`
and `TopologicalAddGroup.t3Space` -/
/-- A separating family of seminorms induces a T₁ topology. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(h : ∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ∃ i, p i x ≠ 0) : T1Space E := by
have := hp.topologicalAddGroup
refine TopologicalAddGroup.t1Space _ ?_
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, hp.isOpen_iff_mem_balls]
rintro x (hx : x ≠ 0)
cases' h x hx with i pi_nonzero
refine ⟨{i}, p i x, by positivity, subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_singleton, mem_ball, zero_sub, map_neg_eq_map, not_lt]
#align with_seminorms.t1_of_separating WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating
/-- A family of seminorms inducing a T₁ topology is separating. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.separating_of_T1 [T1Space E] (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃ i, p i x ≠ 0 := by
have := ((t1Space_TFAE E).out 0 9).mp (inferInstanceAs <| T1Space E)
by_contra! h
refine hx (this ?_)
rw [hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.specializes_iff]
rintro ⟨s, r⟩ (hr : 0 < r)
simp only [ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball_zero, h, hr, forall_true_iff]
#align with_seminorms.separating_of_t1 WithSeminorms.separating_of_T1
/-- A family of seminorms is separating iff it induces a T₁ topology. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.separating_iff_T1 (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ∃ i, p i x ≠ 0) ↔ T1Space E := by
refine ⟨WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating hp, ?_⟩
intro
exact WithSeminorms.separating_of_T1 hp
#align with_seminorms.separating_iff_t1 WithSeminorms.separating_iff_T1
end Topology
section Tendsto
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
/-- Convergence along filters for `WithSeminorms`.
Variant with `Finset.sup`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds' (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) {f : Filter F} (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u f (𝓝 y₀) ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (ε), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ x in f, s.sup p (u x - y₀) < ε := by
simp [hp.hasBasis_ball.tendsto_right_iff]
#align with_seminorms.tendsto_nhds' WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds'
/-- Convergence along filters for `WithSeminorms`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) {f : Filter F} (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u f (𝓝 y₀) ↔ ∀ i ε, 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ x in f, p i (u x - y₀) < ε := by
rw [hp.tendsto_nhds' u y₀]
exact
⟨fun h i => by simpa only [Finset.sup_singleton] using h {i}, fun h s ε hε =>
(s.eventually_all.2 fun i _ => h i ε hε).mono fun _ => finset_sup_apply_lt hε⟩
#align with_seminorms.tendsto_nhds WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds
variable [SemilatticeSup F] [Nonempty F]
/-- Limit `→ ∞` for `WithSeminorms`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds_atTop (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u Filter.atTop (𝓝 y₀) ↔
∀ i ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x₀, ∀ x, x₀ ≤ x → p i (u x - y₀) < ε := by
rw [hp.tendsto_nhds u y₀]
exact forall₃_congr fun _ _ _ => Filter.eventually_atTop
#align with_seminorms.tendsto_nhds_at_top WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds_atTop
end Tendsto
section TopologicalAddGroup
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [Nonempty ι]
section TopologicalSpace
variable [t : TopologicalSpace E]
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_of_nhds [TopologicalAddGroup E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
(h : 𝓝 (0 : E) = p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.filter) : WithSeminorms p := by
refine
⟨TopologicalAddGroup.ext inferInstance p.addGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup ?_⟩
rw [AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_eq]
exact h
#align seminorm_family.with_seminorms_of_nhds SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_of_nhds
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_of_hasBasis [TopologicalAddGroup E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
(h : (𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun s : Set E => s ∈ p.basisSets) id) : WithSeminorms p :=
p.withSeminorms_of_nhds <|
Filter.HasBasis.eq_of_same_basis h p.addGroupFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis
#align seminorm_family.with_seminorms_of_has_basis SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_of_hasBasis
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf [TopologicalAddGroup E]
(p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : WithSeminorms p ↔ (𝓝 (0 : E)) = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) := by
rw [← p.filter_eq_iInf]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, p.withSeminorms_of_nhds⟩
rw [h.topology_eq_withSeminorms]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_eq _
#align seminorm_family.with_seminorms_iff_nhds_eq_infi SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf
/-- The topology induced by a family of seminorms is exactly the infimum of the ones induced by
each seminorm individually. We express this as a characterization of `WithSeminorms p`. -/
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_topologicalSpace_eq_iInf [TopologicalAddGroup E]
(p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
WithSeminorms p ↔
t = ⨅ i, (p i).toSeminormedAddCommGroup.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
rw [p.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf,
TopologicalAddGroup.ext_iff inferInstance (topologicalAddGroup_iInf fun i => inferInstance),
nhds_iInf]
congrm _ = ⨅ i, ?_
exact @comap_norm_nhds_zero _ (p i).toSeminormedAddGroup
#align seminorm_family.with_seminorms_iff_topological_space_eq_infi SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_topologicalSpace_eq_iInf
theorem WithSeminorms.continuous_seminorm {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(i : ι) : Continuous (p i) := by
have := hp.topologicalAddGroup
rw [p.withSeminorms_iff_topologicalSpace_eq_iInf.mp hp]
exact continuous_iInf_dom (@continuous_norm _ (p i).toSeminormedAddGroup)
#align with_seminorms.continuous_seminorm WithSeminorms.continuous_seminorm
end TopologicalSpace
/-- The uniform structure induced by a family of seminorms is exactly the infimum of the ones
induced by each seminorm individually. We express this as a characterization of
`WithSeminorms p`. -/
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_uniformSpace_eq_iInf [u : UniformSpace E]
[UniformAddGroup E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
WithSeminorms p ↔ u = ⨅ i, (p i).toSeminormedAddCommGroup.toUniformSpace := by
rw [p.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf,
UniformAddGroup.ext_iff inferInstance (uniformAddGroup_iInf fun i => inferInstance),
UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf]
congrm _ = ⨅ i, ?_
exact @comap_norm_nhds_zero _ (p i).toAddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
#align seminorm_family.with_seminorms_iff_uniform_space_eq_infi SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_uniformSpace_eq_iInf
end TopologicalAddGroup
section NormedSpace
/-- The topology of a `NormedSpace 𝕜 E` is induced by the seminorm `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`. -/
theorem norm_withSeminorms (𝕜 E) [NormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] :
WithSeminorms fun _ : Fin 1 => normSeminorm 𝕜 E := by
let p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E (Fin 1) := fun _ => normSeminorm 𝕜 E
refine
⟨SeminormedAddCommGroup.toTopologicalAddGroup.ext
p.addGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup ?_⟩
refine Filter.HasBasis.eq_of_same_basis Metric.nhds_basis_ball ?_
rw [← ball_normSeminorm 𝕜 E]
refine
Filter.HasBasis.to_hasBasis p.addGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis ?_ fun r hr =>
⟨(normSeminorm 𝕜 E).ball 0 r, p.basisSets_singleton_mem 0 hr, rfl.subset⟩
rintro U (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets)
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
use r, hr
rw [hU, id]
by_cases h : s.Nonempty
· rw [Finset.sup_const h]
rw [Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp h, Finset.sup_empty, ball_bot _ hr]
exact Set.subset_univ _
#align norm_with_seminorms norm_withSeminorms
end NormedSpace
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
theorem WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded {s : Set E} (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ I : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, I.sup p x < r := by
rw [hp.hasBasis.isVonNBounded_iff]
constructor
· intro h I
simp only [id] at h
specialize h ((I.sup p).ball 0 1) (p.basisSets_mem I zero_lt_one)
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨r, hr, h⟩
cases' NormedField.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 r with a ha
specialize h a (le_of_lt ha)
rw [Seminorm.smul_ball_zero (norm_pos_iff.1 <| hr.trans ha), mul_one] at h
refine ⟨‖a‖, lt_trans hr ha, ?_⟩
intro x hx
specialize h hx
exact (Finset.sup I p).mem_ball_zero.mp h
intro h s' hs'
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hs' with ⟨I, r, hr, hs'⟩
rw [id, hs']
rcases h I with ⟨r', _, h'⟩
simp_rw [← (I.sup p).mem_ball_zero] at h'
refine Absorbs.mono_right ?_ h'
exact (Finset.sup I p).ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hr
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align with_seminorms.is_vonN_bounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded
theorem WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded (f : G → E) {s : Set G}
(hp : WithSeminorms p) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (f '' s) ↔
∀ I : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, I.sup p (f x) < r := by
simp_rw [hp.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded, Set.forall_mem_image]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align with_seminorms.image_is_vonN_bounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded
theorem WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded {s : Set E} (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ i : ι, ∃ r > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, p i x < r := by
rw [hp.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded]
constructor
· intro hI i
convert hI {i}
rw [Finset.sup_singleton]
intro hi I
by_cases hI : I.Nonempty
· choose r hr h using hi
have h' : 0 < I.sup' hI r := by
rcases hI with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (hr i) (Finset.le_sup' r hi)
refine ⟨I.sup' hI r, h', fun x hx => finset_sup_apply_lt h' fun i hi => ?_⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (h i x hx) ?_
simp only [Finset.le_sup'_iff, exists_prop]
exact ⟨i, hi, (Eq.refl _).le⟩
simp only [Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp hI, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, Pi.zero_apply,
exists_prop]
exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun _ _ => zero_lt_one⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align with_seminorms.is_vonN_bounded_iff_seminorm_bounded WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded
theorem WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded (f : G → E) {s : Set G}
(hp : WithSeminorms p) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (f '' s) ↔ ∀ i : ι, ∃ r > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, p i (f x) < r := by
simp_rw [hp.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded, Set.forall_mem_image]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align with_seminorms.image_is_vonN_bounded_iff_seminorm_bounded WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded
end NontriviallyNormedField
-- TODO: the names in this section are not very predictable
section continuous_of_bounded
namespace Seminorm
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕝] [Module 𝕝 E]
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable [NormedField 𝕝₂] [Module 𝕝₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {τ₁₂ : 𝕝 →+* 𝕝₂} [RingHomIsometric τ₁₂]
variable [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι']
theorem continuous_of_continuous_comp {q : SeminormFamily 𝕝₂ F ι'} [TopologicalSpace E]
[TopologicalAddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace F] (hq : WithSeminorms q)
(f : E →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] F) (hf : ∀ i, Continuous ((q i).comp f)) : Continuous f := by
have : TopologicalAddGroup F := hq.topologicalAddGroup
refine continuous_of_continuousAt_zero f ?_
simp_rw [ContinuousAt, f.map_zero, q.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf.mp hq, Filter.tendsto_iInf,
Filter.tendsto_comap_iff]
intro i
convert (hf i).continuousAt.tendsto
exact (map_zero _).symm
#align seminorm.continuous_of_continuous_comp Seminorm.continuous_of_continuous_comp
theorem continuous_iff_continuous_comp {q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι'} [TopologicalSpace E]
[TopologicalAddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace F] (hq : WithSeminorms q) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous ((q i).comp f) :=
-- Porting note: if we *don't* use dot notation for `Continuous.comp`, Lean tries to show
-- continuity of `((q i).comp f) ∘ id` because it doesn't see that `((q i).comp f)` is
-- actually a composition of functions.
⟨fun h i => (hq.continuous_seminorm i).comp h, continuous_of_continuous_comp hq f⟩
#align seminorm.continuous_iff_continuous_comp Seminorm.continuous_iff_continuous_comp
theorem continuous_from_bounded {p : SeminormFamily 𝕝 E ι} {q : SeminormFamily 𝕝₂ F ι'}
{_ : TopologicalSpace E} (hp : WithSeminorms p) {_ : TopologicalSpace F} (hq : WithSeminorms q)
(f : E →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] F) (hf : Seminorm.IsBounded p q f) : Continuous f := by
have : TopologicalAddGroup E := hp.topologicalAddGroup
refine continuous_of_continuous_comp hq _ fun i => ?_
rcases hf i with ⟨s, C, hC⟩
rw [← Seminorm.finset_sup_smul] at hC
-- Note: we deduce continuouty of `s.sup (C • p)` from that of `∑ i ∈ s, C • p i`.
-- The reason is that there is no `continuous_finset_sup`, and even if it were we couldn't
-- really use it since `ℝ` is not an `OrderBot`.
refine Seminorm.continuous_of_le ?_ (hC.trans <| Seminorm.finset_sup_le_sum _ _)
change Continuous (fun x ↦ Seminorm.coeFnAddMonoidHom _ _ (∑ i ∈ s, C • p i) x)
simp_rw [map_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
exact (continuous_finset_sum _ fun i _ ↦ (hp.continuous_seminorm i).const_smul (C : ℝ))
#align seminorm.continuous_from_bounded Seminorm.continuous_from_bounded
theorem cont_withSeminorms_normedSpace (F) [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕝₂ F]
[TopologicalSpace E] {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(f : E →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] F) (hf : ∃ (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0), (normSeminorm 𝕝₂ F).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p) :
Continuous f := by
rw [← Seminorm.isBounded_const (Fin 1)] at hf
exact continuous_from_bounded hp (norm_withSeminorms 𝕝₂ F) f hf
#align seminorm.cont_with_seminorms_normed_space Seminorm.cont_withSeminorms_normedSpace
theorem cont_normedSpace_to_withSeminorms (E) [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕝 E]
[TopologicalSpace F] {q : ι → Seminorm 𝕝₂ F} (hq : WithSeminorms q)
(f : E →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] F) (hf : ∀ i : ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • normSeminorm 𝕝 E) :
Continuous f := by
rw [← Seminorm.const_isBounded (Fin 1)] at hf
exact continuous_from_bounded (norm_withSeminorms 𝕝 E) hq f hf
#align seminorm.cont_normed_space_to_with_seminorms Seminorm.cont_normedSpace_to_withSeminorms
/-- Let `E` and `F` be two topological vector spaces over a `NontriviallyNormedField`, and assume
that the topology of `F` is generated by some family of seminorms `q`. For a family `f` of linear
maps from `E` to `F`, the following are equivalent:
* `f` is equicontinuous at `0`.
* `f` is equicontinuous.
* `f` is uniformly equicontinuous.
* For each `q i`, the family of seminorms `k ↦ (q i) ∘ (f k)` is bounded by some continuous
seminorm `p` on `E`.
* For each `q i`, the seminorm `⊔ k, (q i) ∘ (f k)` is well-defined and continuous.
In particular, if you can determine all continuous seminorms on `E`, that gives you a complete
characterization of equicontinuity for linear maps from `E` to `F`. For example `E` and `F` are
both normed spaces, you get `NormedSpace.equicontinuous_TFAE`. -/
protected theorem _root_.WithSeminorms.equicontinuous_TFAE {κ : Type*}
{q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι'} [UniformSpace E] [UniformAddGroup E] [u : UniformSpace F]
[hu : UniformAddGroup F] (hq : WithSeminorms q) [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
(f : κ → E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : TFAE
[ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) ∘ f) 0,
Equicontinuous ((↑) ∘ f),
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) ∘ f),
∀ i, ∃ p : Seminorm 𝕜 E, Continuous p ∧ ∀ k, (q i).comp (f k) ≤ p,
∀ i, BddAbove (range fun k ↦ (q i).comp (f k)) ∧ Continuous (⨆ k, (q i).comp (f k)) ] := by
-- We start by reducing to the case where the target is a seminormed space
rw [q.withSeminorms_iff_uniformSpace_eq_iInf.mp hq, uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng,
equicontinuous_iInf_rng, equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng]
refine forall_tfae [_, _, _, _, _] fun i ↦ ?_
let _ : SeminormedAddCommGroup F := (q i).toSeminormedAddCommGroup
clear u hu hq
-- Now we can prove the equivalence in this setting
simp only [List.map]
tfae_have 1 → 3
· exact uniformEquicontinuous_of_equicontinuousAt_zero f
tfae_have 3 → 2
· exact UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous
tfae_have 2 → 1
· exact fun H ↦ H 0
tfae_have 3 → 5
· intro H
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 0, ∀ k, q i (f k x) ≤ 1 := by
filter_upwards [Metric.equicontinuousAt_iff_right.mp (H.equicontinuous 0) 1 one_pos]
with x hx k
simpa using (hx k).le
have bdd : BddAbove (range fun k ↦ (q i).comp (f k)) :=
Seminorm.bddAbove_of_absorbent (absorbent_nhds_zero this)
(fun x hx ↦ ⟨1, forall_mem_range.mpr hx⟩)
rw [← Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq bdd]
refine ⟨bdd, Seminorm.continuous' (r := 1) ?_⟩
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
simpa only [closedBall_iSup bdd _ one_pos, mem_iInter, mem_closedBall_zero] using hx
tfae_have 5 → 4
· exact fun H ↦ ⟨⨆ k, (q i).comp (f k), Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq H.1 ▸ H.2, le_ciSup H.1⟩
tfae_have 4 → 1 -- This would work over any `NormedField`
· intro ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩
exact Metric.equicontinuousAt_of_continuity_modulus p (map_zero p ▸ hp.tendsto 0) _ <|
eventually_of_forall fun x k ↦ by simpa using hfp k x
tfae_finish
theorem _root_.WithSeminorms.uniformEquicontinuous_iff_exists_continuous_seminorm {κ : Type*}
{q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι'} [UniformSpace E] [UniformAddGroup E] [u : UniformSpace F]
[hu : UniformAddGroup F] (hq : WithSeminorms q) [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
(f : κ → E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) ∘ f) ↔
∀ i, ∃ p : Seminorm 𝕜 E, Continuous p ∧ ∀ k, (q i).comp (f k) ≤ p :=
(hq.equicontinuous_TFAE f).out 2 3
theorem _root_.WithSeminorms.uniformEquicontinuous_iff_bddAbove_and_continuous_iSup {κ : Type*}
{q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι'} [UniformSpace E] [UniformAddGroup E] [u : UniformSpace F]
[hu : UniformAddGroup F] (hq : WithSeminorms q) [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
(f : κ → E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) ∘ f) ↔ ∀ i,
BddAbove (range fun k ↦ (q i).comp (f k)) ∧
Continuous (⨆ k, (q i).comp (f k)) :=
(hq.equicontinuous_TFAE f).out 2 4
end Seminorm
section Congr
namespace WithSeminorms
variable [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι']
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
/-- Two families of seminorms `p` and `q` on the same space generate the same topology
if each `p i` is bounded by some `C • Finset.sup s q` and vice-versa.
We formulate these boundedness assumptions as `Seminorm.IsBounded q p LinearMap.id` (and
vice-versa) to reuse the API. Furthermore, we don't actually state it as an equality of topologies
but as a way to deduce `WithSeminorms q` from `WithSeminorms p`, since this should be more
useful in practice. -/
protected theorem congr {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} {q : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι'}
[t : TopologicalSpace E] (hp : WithSeminorms p) (hpq : Seminorm.IsBounded p q LinearMap.id)
(hqp : Seminorm.IsBounded q p LinearMap.id) : WithSeminorms q := by
constructor
rw [hp.topology_eq_withSeminorms]
clear hp t
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_ <;>
rw [← continuous_id_iff_le] <;>
refine continuous_from_bounded (.mk (topology := _) rfl) (.mk (topology := _) rfl)
LinearMap.id (by assumption)
protected theorem finset_sups {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} [TopologicalSpace E]
(hp : WithSeminorms p) : WithSeminorms (fun s : Finset ι ↦ s.sup p) := by
refine hp.congr ?_ ?_
· intro s
refine ⟨s, 1, ?_⟩
rw [one_smul]
rfl
· intro i
refine ⟨{{i}}, 1, ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_singleton, Finset.sup_singleton, one_smul]
rfl
protected theorem partial_sups [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
[TopologicalSpace E] (hp : WithSeminorms p) : WithSeminorms (fun i ↦ (Finset.Iic i).sup p) := by
refine hp.congr ?_ ?_
· intro i
refine ⟨Finset.Iic i, 1, ?_⟩
rw [one_smul]
rfl
· intro i
refine ⟨{i}, 1, ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_singleton, one_smul]
exact (Finset.le_sup (Finset.mem_Iic.mpr le_rfl) : p i ≤ (Finset.Iic i).sup p)
protected theorem congr_equiv {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} [t : TopologicalSpace E]
(hp : WithSeminorms p) (e : ι' ≃ ι) : WithSeminorms (p ∘ e) := by
refine hp.congr ?_ ?_ <;>
intro i <;>
[use {e i}, 1; use {e.symm i}, 1] <;>
simp
end WithSeminorms
end Congr
end continuous_of_bounded
section bounded_of_continuous
namespace Seminorm
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
{p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
/-- In a semi-`NormedSpace`, a continuous seminorm is zero on elements of norm `0`. -/
lemma map_eq_zero_of_norm_zero (q : Seminorm 𝕜 F)
(hq : Continuous q) {x : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 0) : q x = 0 :=
(map_zero q) ▸
((specializes_iff_mem_closure.mpr <| mem_closure_zero_iff_norm.mpr hx).map hq).eq.symm
/-- Let `F` be a semi-`NormedSpace` over a `NontriviallyNormedField`, and let `q` be a
seminorm on `F`. If `q` is continuous, then it is uniformly controlled by the norm, that is there
is some `C > 0` such that `∀ x, q x ≤ C * ‖x‖`.
The continuity ensures boundedness on a ball of some radius `ε`. The nontriviality of the
norm is then used to rescale any element into an element of norm in `[ε/C, ε[`, thus with a
controlled image by `q`. The control of `q` at the original element follows by rescaling. -/
lemma bound_of_continuous_normedSpace (q : Seminorm 𝕜 F)
(hq : Continuous q) : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ (∀ x : F, q x ≤ C * ‖x‖) := by
have hq' : Tendsto q (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) := map_zero q ▸ hq.tendsto 0
rcases NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt.mem_iff.mp (hq' <| Iio_mem_nhds one_pos)
with ⟨ε, ε_pos, hε⟩
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
have : 0 < ‖c‖ / ε := by positivity
refine ⟨‖c‖ / ε, this, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
by_cases hx : ‖x‖ = 0
· rw [hx, mul_zero]
exact le_of_eq (map_eq_zero_of_norm_zero q hq hx)
· refine (normSeminorm 𝕜 F).bound_of_shell q ε_pos hc (fun x hle hlt ↦ ?_) hx
refine (le_of_lt <| show q x < _ from hε hlt).trans ?_
rwa [← div_le_iff' this, one_div_div]
/-- Let `E` be a topological vector space (over a `NontriviallyNormedField`) whose topology is
generated by some family of seminorms `p`, and let `q` be a seminorm on `E`. If `q` is continuous,
then it is uniformly controlled by *finitely many* seminorms of `p`, that is there
is some finset `s` of the index set and some `C > 0` such that `q ≤ C • s.sup p`. -/
lemma bound_of_continuous [Nonempty ι] [t : TopologicalSpace E] (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (hq : Continuous q) :
∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, C ≠ 0 ∧ q ≤ C • s.sup p := by
-- The continuity of `q` gives us a finset `s` and a real `ε > 0`
-- such that `hε : (s.sup p).ball 0 ε ⊆ q.ball 0 1`.
rcases hp.hasBasis.mem_iff.mp (ball_mem_nhds hq one_pos) with ⟨V, hV, hε⟩
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hV with ⟨s, ε, ε_pos, rfl⟩
-- Now forget that `E` already had a topology and view it as the (semi)normed space
-- `(E, s.sup p)`.
clear hp hq t
let _ : SeminormedAddCommGroup E := (s.sup p).toSeminormedAddCommGroup
let _ : NormedSpace 𝕜 E := { norm_smul_le := fun a b ↦ le_of_eq (map_smul_eq_mul (s.sup p) a b) }
-- The inclusion `hε` tells us exactly that `q` is *still* continuous for this new topology
have : Continuous q :=
Seminorm.continuous (r := 1) (mem_of_superset (Metric.ball_mem_nhds _ ε_pos) hε)
-- Hence we can conclude by applying `bound_of_continuous_normedSpace`.
rcases bound_of_continuous_normedSpace q this with ⟨C, C_pos, hC⟩
exact ⟨s, ⟨C, C_pos.le⟩, fun H ↦ C_pos.ne.symm (congr_arg NNReal.toReal H), hC⟩
-- Note that the key ingredient for this proof is that, by scaling arguments hidden in
-- `Seminorm.continuous`, we only have to look at the `q`-ball of radius one, and the `s` we get
-- from that will automatically work for all other radii.
end Seminorm
end bounded_of_continuous
section LocallyConvexSpace
open LocallyConvexSpace
variable [Nonempty ι] [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module ℝ E]
[IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
theorem WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
LocallyConvexSpace ℝ E := by
have := hp.topologicalAddGroup
apply ofBasisZero ℝ E id fun s => s ∈ p.basisSets
· rw [hp.1, AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_eq _, AddGroupFilterBasis.N_zero]
exact FilterBasis.hasBasis _
· intro s hs
change s ∈ Set.iUnion _ at hs
simp_rw [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨I, r, _, rfl⟩
exact convex_ball _ _ _
#align with_seminorms.to_locally_convex_space WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace
end LocallyConvexSpace
section NormedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] [SeminormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- Not an instance since `𝕜` can't be inferred. See `NormedSpace.toLocallyConvexSpace` for a
slightly weaker instance version. -/
theorem NormedSpace.toLocallyConvexSpace' [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] :
LocallyConvexSpace ℝ E :=
(norm_withSeminorms 𝕜 E).toLocallyConvexSpace
#align normed_space.to_locally_convex_space' NormedSpace.toLocallyConvexSpace'
/-- See `NormedSpace.toLocallyConvexSpace'` for a slightly stronger version which is not an
instance. -/
instance NormedSpace.toLocallyConvexSpace [NormedSpace ℝ E] : LocallyConvexSpace ℝ E :=
NormedSpace.toLocallyConvexSpace' ℝ
#align normed_space.to_locally_convex_space NormedSpace.toLocallyConvexSpace
end NormedSpace
section TopologicalConstructions
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
/-- The family of seminorms obtained by composing each seminorm by a linear map. -/
def SeminormFamily.comp (q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι :=
fun i => (q i).comp f
#align seminorm_family.comp SeminormFamily.comp
theorem SeminormFamily.comp_apply (q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι) (i : ι) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
q.comp f i = (q i).comp f :=
rfl
#align seminorm_family.comp_apply SeminormFamily.comp_apply
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/WithSeminorms.lean | 902 | 906 | theorem SeminormFamily.finset_sup_comp (q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι) (s : Finset ι)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : (s.sup q).comp f = s.sup (q.comp f) := by |
ext x
rw [Seminorm.comp_apply, Seminorm.finset_sup_apply, Seminorm.finset_sup_apply]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Geißer, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.DiophantineApproximation
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
#align_import number_theory.pell from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7ad820c4997738e2f542f8a20f32911f52020e26"
/-!
# Pell's Equation
*Pell's Equation* is the equation $x^2 - d y^2 = 1$, where $d$ is a positive integer
that is not a square, and one is interested in solutions in integers $x$ and $y$.
In this file, we aim at providing all of the essential theory of Pell's Equation for general $d$
(as opposed to the contents of `NumberTheory.PellMatiyasevic`, which is specific to the case
$d = a^2 - 1$ for some $a > 1$).
We begin by defining a type `Pell.Solution₁ d` for solutions of the equation,
show that it has a natural structure as an abelian group, and prove some basic
properties.
We then prove the following
**Theorem.** Let $d$ be a positive integer that is not a square. Then the equation
$x^2 - d y^2 = 1$ has a nontrivial (i.e., with $y \ne 0$) solution in integers.
See `Pell.exists_of_not_isSquare` and `Pell.Solution₁.exists_nontrivial_of_not_isSquare`.
We then define the *fundamental solution* to be the solution
with smallest $x$ among all solutions satisfying $x > 1$ and $y > 0$.
We show that every solution is a power (in the sense of the group structure mentioned above)
of the fundamental solution up to a (common) sign,
see `Pell.IsFundamental.eq_zpow_or_neg_zpow`, and that a (positive) solution has this property
if and only if it is fundamental, see `Pell.pos_generator_iff_fundamental`.
## References
* [K. Ireland, M. Rosen, *A classical introduction to modern number theory*
(Section 17.5)][IrelandRosen1990]
## Tags
Pell's equation
## TODO
* Extend to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = -1` and further generalizations.
* Connect solutions to the continued fraction expansion of `√d`.
-/
namespace Pell
/-!
### Group structure of the solution set
We define a structure of a commutative multiplicative group with distributive negation
on the set of all solutions to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`.
The type of such solutions is `Pell.Solution₁ d`. It corresponds to a pair of integers `x` and `y`
and a proof that `(x, y)` is indeed a solution.
The multiplication is given by `(x, y) * (x', y') = (x*y' + d*y*y', x*y' + y*x')`.
This is obtained by mapping `(x, y)` to `x + y*√d` and multiplying the results.
In fact, we define `Pell.Solution₁ d` to be `↥(unitary (ℤ√d))` and transport
the "commutative group with distributive negation" structure from `↥(unitary (ℤ√d))`.
We then set up an API for `Pell.Solution₁ d`.
-/
open Zsqrtd
/-- An element of `ℤ√d` has norm one (i.e., `a.re^2 - d*a.im^2 = 1`) if and only if
it is contained in the submonoid of unitary elements.
TODO: merge this result with `Pell.isPell_iff_mem_unitary`. -/
theorem is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary {d : ℤ} {a : ℤ√d} :
a.re ^ 2 - d * a.im ^ 2 = 1 ↔ a ∈ unitary (ℤ√d) := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary, norm_def, sq, sq, ← mul_assoc]
#align pell.is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary Pell.is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary
-- We use `solution₁ d` to allow for a more general structure `solution d m` that
-- encodes solutions to `x^2 - d*y^2 = m` to be added later.
/-- `Pell.Solution₁ d` is the type of solutions to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`.
We define this in terms of elements of `ℤ√d` of norm one.
-/
def Solution₁ (d : ℤ) : Type :=
↥(unitary (ℤ√d))
#align pell.solution₁ Pell.Solution₁
namespace Solution₁
variable {d : ℤ}
-- Porting note(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020): manual deriving
instance instCommGroup : CommGroup (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (CommGroup (unitary (ℤ√d)))
#align pell.solution₁.comm_group Pell.Solution₁.instCommGroup
instance instHasDistribNeg : HasDistribNeg (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (HasDistribNeg (unitary (ℤ√d)))
#align pell.solution₁.has_distrib_neg Pell.Solution₁.instHasDistribNeg
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (unitary (ℤ√d)))
#align pell.solution₁.inhabited Pell.Solution₁.instInhabited
instance : Coe (Solution₁ d) (ℤ√d) where coe := Subtype.val
/-- The `x` component of a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
protected def x (a : Solution₁ d) : ℤ :=
(a : ℤ√d).re
#align pell.solution₁.x Pell.Solution₁.x
/-- The `y` component of a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
protected def y (a : Solution₁ d) : ℤ :=
(a : ℤ√d).im
#align pell.solution₁.y Pell.Solution₁.y
/-- The proof that `a` is a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
theorem prop (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ^ 2 - d * a.y ^ 2 = 1 :=
is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary.mpr a.property
#align pell.solution₁.prop Pell.Solution₁.prop
/-- An alternative form of the equation, suitable for rewriting `x^2`. -/
theorem prop_x (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ^ 2 = 1 + d * a.y ^ 2 := by rw [← a.prop]; ring
#align pell.solution₁.prop_x Pell.Solution₁.prop_x
/-- An alternative form of the equation, suitable for rewriting `d * y^2`. -/
theorem prop_y (a : Solution₁ d) : d * a.y ^ 2 = a.x ^ 2 - 1 := by rw [← a.prop]; ring
#align pell.solution₁.prop_y Pell.Solution₁.prop_y
/-- Two solutions are equal if their `x` and `y` components are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {a b : Solution₁ d} (hx : a.x = b.x) (hy : a.y = b.y) : a = b :=
Subtype.ext <| Zsqrtd.ext _ _ hx hy
#align pell.solution₁.ext Pell.Solution₁.ext
/-- Construct a solution from `x`, `y` and a proof that the equation is satisfied. -/
def mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : Solution₁ d where
val := ⟨x, y⟩
property := is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary.mp prop
#align pell.solution₁.mk Pell.Solution₁.mk
@[simp]
theorem x_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (mk x y prop).x = x :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_mk Pell.Solution₁.x_mk
@[simp]
theorem y_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (mk x y prop).y = y :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_mk Pell.Solution₁.y_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (↑(mk x y prop) : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, y⟩ :=
Zsqrtd.ext _ _ (x_mk x y prop) (y_mk x y prop)
#align pell.solution₁.coe_mk Pell.Solution₁.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem x_one : (1 : Solution₁ d).x = 1 :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_one Pell.Solution₁.x_one
@[simp]
theorem y_one : (1 : Solution₁ d).y = 0 :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_one Pell.Solution₁.y_one
@[simp]
theorem x_mul (a b : Solution₁ d) : (a * b).x = a.x * b.x + d * (a.y * b.y) := by
rw [← mul_assoc]
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_mul Pell.Solution₁.x_mul
@[simp]
theorem y_mul (a b : Solution₁ d) : (a * b).y = a.x * b.y + a.y * b.x :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_mul Pell.Solution₁.y_mul
@[simp]
theorem x_inv (a : Solution₁ d) : a⁻¹.x = a.x :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_inv Pell.Solution₁.x_inv
@[simp]
theorem y_inv (a : Solution₁ d) : a⁻¹.y = -a.y :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_inv Pell.Solution₁.y_inv
@[simp]
theorem x_neg (a : Solution₁ d) : (-a).x = -a.x :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_neg Pell.Solution₁.x_neg
@[simp]
theorem y_neg (a : Solution₁ d) : (-a).y = -a.y :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_neg Pell.Solution₁.y_neg
/-- When `d` is negative, then `x` or `y` must be zero in a solution. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_d_neg (h₀ : d < 0) (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x = 0 ∨ a.y = 0 := by
have h := a.prop
contrapose! h
have h1 := sq_pos_of_ne_zero h.1
have h2 := sq_pos_of_ne_zero h.2
nlinarith
#align pell.solution₁.eq_zero_of_d_neg Pell.Solution₁.eq_zero_of_d_neg
/-- A solution has `x ≠ 0`. -/
theorem x_ne_zero (h₀ : 0 ≤ d) (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ≠ 0 := by
intro hx
have h : 0 ≤ d * a.y ^ 2 := mul_nonneg h₀ (sq_nonneg _)
rw [a.prop_y, hx, sq, zero_mul, zero_sub] at h
exact not_le.mpr (neg_one_lt_zero : (-1 : ℤ) < 0) h
#align pell.solution₁.x_ne_zero Pell.Solution₁.x_ne_zero
/-- A solution with `x > 1` must have `y ≠ 0`. -/
theorem y_ne_zero_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : a.y ≠ 0 := by
intro hy
have prop := a.prop
rw [hy, sq (0 : ℤ), zero_mul, mul_zero, sub_zero] at prop
exact lt_irrefl _ (((one_lt_sq_iff <| zero_le_one.trans ha.le).mpr ha).trans_eq prop)
#align pell.solution₁.y_ne_zero_of_one_lt_x Pell.Solution₁.y_ne_zero_of_one_lt_x
/-- If a solution has `x > 1`, then `d` is positive. -/
theorem d_pos_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : 0 < d := by
refine pos_of_mul_pos_left ?_ (sq_nonneg a.y)
rw [a.prop_y, sub_pos]
exact one_lt_pow ha two_ne_zero
#align pell.solution₁.d_pos_of_one_lt_x Pell.Solution₁.d_pos_of_one_lt_x
/-- If a solution has `x > 1`, then `d` is not a square. -/
theorem d_nonsquare_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : ¬IsSquare d := by
have hp := a.prop
rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← sq, ← mul_pow, sq_sub_sq, Int.mul_eq_one_iff_eq_one_or_neg_one] at hp
rcases hp with (⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩ | ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩) <;> omega
#align pell.solution₁.d_nonsquare_of_one_lt_x Pell.Solution₁.d_nonsquare_of_one_lt_x
/-- A solution with `x = 1` is trivial. -/
theorem eq_one_of_x_eq_one (h₀ : d ≠ 0) {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : a.x = 1) : a = 1 := by
have prop := a.prop_y
rw [ha, one_pow, sub_self, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right h₀, sq_eq_zero_iff] at prop
exact ext ha prop
#align pell.solution₁.eq_one_of_x_eq_one Pell.Solution₁.eq_one_of_x_eq_one
/-- A solution is `1` or `-1` if and only if `y = 0`. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one_iff_y_eq_zero {a : Solution₁ d} : a = 1 ∨ a = -1 ↔ a.y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.elim (fun h => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h], fun H => ?_⟩
have prop := a.prop
rw [H, sq (0 : ℤ), mul_zero, mul_zero, sub_zero, sq_eq_one_iff] at prop
exact prop.imp (fun h => ext h H) fun h => ext h H
#align pell.solution₁.eq_one_or_neg_one_iff_y_eq_zero Pell.Solution₁.eq_one_or_neg_one_iff_y_eq_zero
/-- The set of solutions with `x > 0` is closed under multiplication. -/
theorem x_mul_pos {a b : Solution₁ d} (ha : 0 < a.x) (hb : 0 < b.x) : 0 < (a * b).x := by
simp only [x_mul]
refine neg_lt_iff_pos_add'.mp (abs_lt.mp ?_).1
rw [← abs_of_pos ha, ← abs_of_pos hb, ← abs_mul, ← sq_lt_sq, mul_pow a.x, a.prop_x, b.prop_x, ←
sub_pos]
ring_nf
rcases le_or_lt 0 d with h | h
· positivity
· rw [(eq_zero_of_d_neg h a).resolve_left ha.ne', (eq_zero_of_d_neg h b).resolve_left hb.ne']
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [zero_pow two_ne_zero, zero_add, zero_mul, zero_add]
-- exact one_pos
-- but this relied on the exact output of `ring_nf`
simp
#align pell.solution₁.x_mul_pos Pell.Solution₁.x_mul_pos
/-- The set of solutions with `x` and `y` positive is closed under multiplication. -/
theorem y_mul_pos {a b : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) (hbx : 0 < b.x)
(hby : 0 < b.y) : 0 < (a * b).y := by
simp only [y_mul]
positivity
#align pell.solution₁.y_mul_pos Pell.Solution₁.y_mul_pos
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` positive, then all its powers with natural exponents
have positive `x`. -/
theorem x_pow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (n : ℕ) : 0 < (a ^ n).x := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, pow_zero, x_one, zero_lt_one]
· rw [pow_succ]
exact x_mul_pos ih hax
#align pell.solution₁.x_pow_pos Pell.Solution₁.x_pow_pos
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` and `y` positive, then all its powers with positive
natural exponents have positive `y`. -/
theorem y_pow_succ_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) (n : ℕ) :
0 < (a ^ n.succ).y := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, ← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero, hay, pow_one]
· rw [pow_succ']
exact y_mul_pos hax hay (x_pow_pos hax _) ih
#align pell.solution₁.y_pow_succ_pos Pell.Solution₁.y_pow_succ_pos
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` and `y` positive, then all its powers with positive
exponents have positive `y`. -/
theorem y_zpow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 < n) :
0 < (a ^ n).y := by
lift n to ℕ using hn.le
norm_cast at hn ⊢
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hn]
exact y_pow_succ_pos hax hay _
#align pell.solution₁.y_zpow_pos Pell.Solution₁.y_zpow_pos
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` positive, then all its powers have positive `x`. -/
theorem x_zpow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (n : ℤ) : 0 < (a ^ n).x := by
cases n with
| ofNat n =>
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact x_pow_pos hax n
| negSucc n =>
rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact x_pow_pos hax (n + 1)
#align pell.solution₁.x_zpow_pos Pell.Solution₁.x_zpow_pos
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` and `y` positive, then the `y` component of any power
has the same sign as the exponent. -/
theorem sign_y_zpow_eq_sign_of_x_pos_of_y_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y)
(n : ℤ) : (a ^ n).y.sign = n.sign := by
rcases n with ((_ | n) | n)
· rfl
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact Int.sign_eq_one_of_pos (y_pow_succ_pos hax hay n)
· rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact Int.sign_eq_neg_one_of_neg (neg_neg_of_pos (y_pow_succ_pos hax hay n))
#align pell.solution₁.sign_y_zpow_eq_sign_of_x_pos_of_y_pos Pell.Solution₁.sign_y_zpow_eq_sign_of_x_pos_of_y_pos
/-- If `a` is any solution, then one of `a`, `a⁻¹`, `-a`, `-a⁻¹` has
positive `x` and nonnegative `y`. -/
theorem exists_pos_variant (h₀ : 0 < d) (a : Solution₁ d) :
∃ b : Solution₁ d, 0 < b.x ∧ 0 ≤ b.y ∧ a ∈ ({b, b⁻¹, -b, -b⁻¹} : Set (Solution₁ d)) := by
refine
(lt_or_gt_of_ne (a.x_ne_zero h₀.le)).elim
((le_total 0 a.y).elim (fun hy hx => ⟨-a⁻¹, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩) fun hy hx => ⟨-a, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩)
((le_total 0 a.y).elim (fun hy hx => ⟨a, hx, hy, ?_⟩) fun hy hx => ⟨a⁻¹, hx, ?_, ?_⟩) <;>
simp only [neg_neg, inv_inv, neg_inv, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, true_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, x_neg, x_inv, y_neg, y_inv, neg_pos, neg_nonneg, or_true_iff] <;>
assumption
#align pell.solution₁.exists_pos_variant Pell.Solution₁.exists_pos_variant
end Solution₁
section Existence
/-!
### Existence of nontrivial solutions
-/
variable {d : ℤ}
open Set Real
/-- If `d` is a positive integer that is not a square, then there is a nontrivial solution
to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`. -/
theorem exists_of_not_isSquare (h₀ : 0 < d) (hd : ¬IsSquare d) :
∃ x y : ℤ, x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
let ξ : ℝ := √d
have hξ : Irrational ξ := by
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt 2 d (sq_sqrt <| Int.cast_nonneg.mpr h₀.le) ?_ two_pos
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine hd ⟨x, @Int.cast_injective ℝ _ _ d (x * x) ?_⟩
rw [← sq_sqrt <| Int.cast_nonneg.mpr h₀.le, Int.cast_mul, ← hx, sq]
obtain ⟨M, hM₁⟩ := exists_int_gt (2 * |ξ| + 1)
have hM : {q : ℚ | |q.1 ^ 2 - d * (q.2 : ℤ) ^ 2| < M}.Infinite := by
refine Infinite.mono (fun q h => ?_) (infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq_of_irrational hξ)
have h0 : 0 < (q.2 : ℝ) ^ 2 := pow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr q.pos) 2
have h1 : (q.num : ℝ) / (q.den : ℝ) = q := mod_cast q.num_div_den
rw [mem_setOf, abs_sub_comm, ← @Int.cast_lt ℝ, ← div_lt_div_right (abs_pos_of_pos h0)]
push_cast
rw [← abs_div, abs_sq, sub_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h0.ne', ← div_pow, h1, ←
sq_sqrt (Int.cast_pos.mpr h₀).le, sq_sub_sq, abs_mul, ← mul_one_div]
refine mul_lt_mul'' (((abs_add ξ q).trans ?_).trans_lt hM₁) h (abs_nonneg _) (abs_nonneg _)
rw [two_mul, add_assoc, add_le_add_iff_left, ← sub_le_iff_le_add']
rw [mem_setOf, abs_sub_comm] at h
refine (abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub (q : ℝ) ξ).trans (h.le.trans ?_)
rw [div_le_one h0, one_le_sq_iff_one_le_abs, Nat.abs_cast, Nat.one_le_cast]
exact q.pos
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ : ∃ m : ℤ, {q : ℚ | q.1 ^ 2 - d * (q.den : ℤ) ^ 2 = m}.Infinite := by
contrapose! hM
simp only [not_infinite] at hM ⊢
refine (congr_arg _ (ext fun x => ?_)).mp (Finite.biUnion (finite_Ioo (-M) M) fun m _ => hM m)
simp only [abs_lt, mem_setOf, mem_Ioo, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
have hm₀ : m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := hm.nonempty
rw [mem_setOf, sub_eq_zero, mul_comm] at hq
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := (Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero).mp ⟨d, hq⟩
rw [ha, mul_pow, mul_right_inj' (pow_pos (Int.natCast_pos.mpr q.pos) 2).ne'] at hq
exact hd ⟨a, sq a ▸ hq.symm⟩
haveI := neZero_iff.mpr (Int.natAbs_ne_zero.mpr hm₀)
let f : ℚ → ZMod m.natAbs × ZMod m.natAbs := fun q => (q.num, q.den)
obtain ⟨q₁, h₁ : q₁.num ^ 2 - d * (q₁.den : ℤ) ^ 2 = m,
q₂, h₂ : q₂.num ^ 2 - d * (q₂.den : ℤ) ^ 2 = m, hne, hqf⟩ :=
hm.exists_ne_map_eq_of_mapsTo (mapsTo_univ f _) finite_univ
obtain ⟨hq1 : (q₁.num : ZMod m.natAbs) = q₂.num, hq2 : (q₁.den : ZMod m.natAbs) = q₂.den⟩ :=
Prod.ext_iff.mp hqf
have hd₁ : m ∣ q₁.num * q₂.num - d * (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [← Int.natAbs_dvd, ← ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
push_cast
rw [hq1, hq2, ← sq, ← sq]
norm_cast
rw [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Int.natAbs_dvd, Nat.cast_pow, ← h₂]
have hd₂ : m ∣ q₁.num * q₂.den - q₂.num * q₁.den := by
rw [← Int.natAbs_dvd, ← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub]
push_cast
rw [hq1, hq2]
replace hm₀ : (m : ℚ) ≠ 0 := Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hm₀
refine ⟨(q₁.num * q₂.num - d * (q₁.den * q₂.den)) / m, (q₁.num * q₂.den - q₂.num * q₁.den) / m,
?_, ?_⟩
· qify [hd₁, hd₂]
field_simp [hm₀]
norm_cast
conv_rhs =>
rw [sq]
congr
· rw [← h₁]
· rw [← h₂]
push_cast
ring
· qify [hd₂]
refine div_ne_zero_iff.mpr ⟨?_, hm₀⟩
exact mod_cast mt sub_eq_zero.mp (mt Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul.mpr hne)
#align pell.exists_of_not_is_square Pell.exists_of_not_isSquare
/-- If `d` is a positive integer, then there is a nontrivial solution
to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` if and only if `d` is not a square. -/
theorem exists_iff_not_isSquare (h₀ : 0 < d) :
(∃ x y : ℤ, x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1 ∧ y ≠ 0) ↔ ¬IsSquare d := by
refine ⟨?_, exists_of_not_isSquare h₀⟩
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy, hy⟩ ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [← sq, ← mul_pow, sq_sub_sq] at hxy
simpa [hy, mul_self_pos.mp h₀, sub_eq_add_neg, eq_neg_self_iff] using Int.eq_of_mul_eq_one hxy
#align pell.exists_iff_not_is_square Pell.exists_iff_not_isSquare
namespace Solution₁
/-- If `d` is a positive integer that is not a square, then there exists a nontrivial solution
to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`. -/
theorem exists_nontrivial_of_not_isSquare (h₀ : 0 < d) (hd : ¬IsSquare d) :
∃ a : Solution₁ d, a ≠ 1 ∧ a ≠ -1 := by
obtain ⟨x, y, prop, hy⟩ := exists_of_not_isSquare h₀ hd
refine ⟨mk x y prop, fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩ <;> apply_fun Solution₁.y at H <;>
simp [hy] at H
#align pell.solution₁.exists_nontrivial_of_not_is_square Pell.Solution₁.exists_nontrivial_of_not_isSquare
/-- If `d` is a positive integer that is not a square, then there exists a solution
to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` with `x > 1` and `y > 0`. -/
theorem exists_pos_of_not_isSquare (h₀ : 0 < d) (hd : ¬IsSquare d) :
∃ a : Solution₁ d, 1 < a.x ∧ 0 < a.y := by
obtain ⟨x, y, h, hy⟩ := exists_of_not_isSquare h₀ hd
refine ⟨mk |x| |y| (by rwa [sq_abs, sq_abs]), ?_, abs_pos.mpr hy⟩
rw [x_mk, ← one_lt_sq_iff_one_lt_abs, eq_add_of_sub_eq h, lt_add_iff_pos_right]
exact mul_pos h₀ (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hy)
#align pell.solution₁.exists_pos_of_not_is_square Pell.Solution₁.exists_pos_of_not_isSquare
end Solution₁
end Existence
/-! ### Fundamental solutions
We define the notion of a *fundamental solution* of Pell's equation and
show that it exists and is unique (when `d` is positive and non-square)
and generates the group of solutions up to sign.
-/
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- We define a solution to be *fundamental* if it has `x > 1` and `y > 0`
and its `x` is the smallest possible among solutions with `x > 1`. -/
def IsFundamental (a : Solution₁ d) : Prop :=
1 < a.x ∧ 0 < a.y ∧ ∀ {b : Solution₁ d}, 1 < b.x → a.x ≤ b.x
#align pell.is_fundamental Pell.IsFundamental
namespace IsFundamental
open Solution₁
/-- A fundamental solution has positive `x`. -/
theorem x_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a) : 0 < a.x :=
zero_lt_one.trans h.1
#align pell.is_fundamental.x_pos Pell.IsFundamental.x_pos
/-- If a fundamental solution exists, then `d` must be positive. -/
theorem d_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a) : 0 < d :=
d_pos_of_one_lt_x h.1
#align pell.is_fundamental.d_pos Pell.IsFundamental.d_pos
/-- If a fundamental solution exists, then `d` must be a non-square. -/
theorem d_nonsquare {a : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a) : ¬IsSquare d :=
d_nonsquare_of_one_lt_x h.1
#align pell.is_fundamental.d_nonsquare Pell.IsFundamental.d_nonsquare
/-- If there is a fundamental solution, it is unique. -/
theorem subsingleton {a b : Solution₁ d} (ha : IsFundamental a) (hb : IsFundamental b) : a = b := by
have hx := le_antisymm (ha.2.2 hb.1) (hb.2.2 ha.1)
refine Solution₁.ext hx ?_
have : d * a.y ^ 2 = d * b.y ^ 2 := by rw [a.prop_y, b.prop_y, hx]
exact (sq_eq_sq ha.2.1.le hb.2.1.le).mp (Int.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left ha.d_pos.ne' this)
#align pell.is_fundamental.subsingleton Pell.IsFundamental.subsingleton
/-- If `d` is positive and not a square, then a fundamental solution exists. -/
theorem exists_of_not_isSquare (h₀ : 0 < d) (hd : ¬IsSquare d) :
∃ a : Solution₁ d, IsFundamental a := by
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := exists_pos_of_not_isSquare h₀ hd
-- convert to `x : ℕ` to be able to use `Nat.find`
have P : ∃ x' : ℕ, 1 < x' ∧ ∃ y' : ℤ, 0 < y' ∧ (x' : ℤ) ^ 2 - d * y' ^ 2 = 1 := by
have hax := a.prop
lift a.x to ℕ using by positivity with ax
norm_cast at ha₁
exact ⟨ax, ha₁, a.y, ha₂, hax⟩
classical
-- to avoid having to show that the predicate is decidable
let x₁ := Nat.find P
obtain ⟨hx, y₁, hy₀, hy₁⟩ := Nat.find_spec P
refine ⟨mk x₁ y₁ hy₁, by rw [x_mk]; exact mod_cast hx, hy₀, fun {b} hb => ?_⟩
rw [x_mk]
have hb' := (Int.toNat_of_nonneg <| zero_le_one.trans hb.le).symm
have hb'' := hb
rw [hb'] at hb ⊢
norm_cast at hb ⊢
refine Nat.find_min' P ⟨hb, |b.y|, abs_pos.mpr <| y_ne_zero_of_one_lt_x hb'', ?_⟩
rw [← hb', sq_abs]
exact b.prop
#align pell.is_fundamental.exists_of_not_is_square Pell.IsFundamental.exists_of_not_isSquare
/-- The map sending an integer `n` to the `y`-coordinate of `a^n` for a fundamental
solution `a` is stritcly increasing. -/
theorem y_strictMono {a : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a) :
StrictMono fun n : ℤ => (a ^ n).y := by
have H : ∀ n : ℤ, 0 ≤ n → (a ^ n).y < (a ^ (n + 1)).y := by
intro n hn
rw [← sub_pos, zpow_add, zpow_one, y_mul, add_sub_assoc]
rw [show (a ^ n).y * a.x - (a ^ n).y = (a ^ n).y * (a.x - 1) by ring]
refine
add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (mul_pos (x_zpow_pos h.x_pos _) h.2.1)
(mul_nonneg ?_ (by rw [sub_nonneg]; exact h.1.le))
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hn)
· simp only [zpow_zero, y_one, le_refl]
· exact (y_zpow_pos h.x_pos h.2.1 hn).le
refine strictMono_int_of_lt_succ fun n => ?_
rcases le_or_lt 0 n with hn | hn
· exact H n hn
· let m : ℤ := -n - 1
have hm : n = -m - 1 := by simp only [m, neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_tsub_cancel_left]
rw [hm, sub_add_cancel, ← neg_add', zpow_neg, zpow_neg, y_inv, y_inv, neg_lt_neg_iff]
exact H _ (by omega)
#align pell.is_fundamental.y_strict_mono Pell.IsFundamental.y_strictMono
/-- If `a` is a fundamental solution, then `(a^m).y < (a^n).y` if and only if `m < n`. -/
theorem zpow_y_lt_iff_lt {a : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a) (m n : ℤ) :
(a ^ m).y < (a ^ n).y ↔ m < n := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => h.y_strictMono H⟩
contrapose! H
exact h.y_strictMono.monotone H
#align pell.is_fundamental.zpow_y_lt_iff_lt Pell.IsFundamental.zpow_y_lt_iff_lt
/-- The `n`th power of a fundamental solution is trivial if and only if `n = 0`. -/
theorem zpow_eq_one_iff {a : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a) (n : ℤ) : a ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← zpow_zero a]
exact ⟨fun H => h.y_strictMono.injective (congr_arg Solution₁.y H), fun H => H ▸ rfl⟩
#align pell.is_fundamental.zpow_eq_one_iff Pell.IsFundamental.zpow_eq_one_iff
/-- A power of a fundamental solution is never equal to the negative of a power of this
fundamental solution. -/
theorem zpow_ne_neg_zpow {a : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a) {n n' : ℤ} : a ^ n ≠ -a ^ n' := by
intro hf
apply_fun Solution₁.x at hf
have H := x_zpow_pos h.x_pos n
rw [hf, x_neg, lt_neg, neg_zero] at H
exact lt_irrefl _ ((x_zpow_pos h.x_pos n').trans H)
#align pell.is_fundamental.zpow_ne_neg_zpow Pell.IsFundamental.zpow_ne_neg_zpow
/-- The `x`-coordinate of a fundamental solution is a lower bound for the `x`-coordinate
of any positive solution. -/
theorem x_le_x {a₁ : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a₁) {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 1 < a.x) :
a₁.x ≤ a.x :=
h.2.2 hax
#align pell.is_fundamental.x_le_x Pell.IsFundamental.x_le_x
/-- The `y`-coordinate of a fundamental solution is a lower bound for the `y`-coordinate
of any positive solution. -/
theorem y_le_y {a₁ : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a₁) {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 1 < a.x)
(hay : 0 < a.y) : a₁.y ≤ a.y := by
have H : d * (a₁.y ^ 2 - a.y ^ 2) = a₁.x ^ 2 - a.x ^ 2 := by rw [a.prop_x, a₁.prop_x]; ring
rw [← abs_of_pos hay, ← abs_of_pos h.2.1, ← sq_le_sq, ← mul_le_mul_left h.d_pos, ← sub_nonpos, ←
mul_sub, H, sub_nonpos, sq_le_sq, abs_of_pos (zero_lt_one.trans h.1),
abs_of_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hax)]
exact h.x_le_x hax
#align pell.is_fundamental.y_le_y Pell.IsFundamental.y_le_y
-- helper lemma for the next three results
theorem x_mul_y_le_y_mul_x {a₁ : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a₁) {a : Solution₁ d}
(hax : 1 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) : a.x * a₁.y ≤ a.y * a₁.x := by
rw [← abs_of_pos <| zero_lt_one.trans hax, ← abs_of_pos hay, ← abs_of_pos h.x_pos, ←
abs_of_pos h.2.1, ← abs_mul, ← abs_mul, ← sq_le_sq, mul_pow, mul_pow, a.prop_x, a₁.prop_x, ←
sub_nonneg]
ring_nf
rw [sub_nonneg, sq_le_sq, abs_of_pos hay, abs_of_pos h.2.1]
exact h.y_le_y hax hay
#align pell.is_fundamental.x_mul_y_le_y_mul_x Pell.IsFundamental.x_mul_y_le_y_mul_x
/-- If we multiply a positive solution with the inverse of a fundamental solution,
the `y`-coordinate remains nonnegative. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Pell.lean | 618 | 621 | theorem mul_inv_y_nonneg {a₁ : Solution₁ d} (h : IsFundamental a₁) {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 1 < a.x)
(hay : 0 < a.y) : 0 ≤ (a * a₁⁻¹).y := by |
simpa only [y_inv, mul_neg, y_mul, le_neg_add_iff_add_le, add_zero] using
h.x_mul_y_le_y_mul_x hax hay
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty
import Mathlib.Init.Logic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Inhabit
#align_import logic.unique from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4658a649d216f57e99621708b09dcb3dcccbd23"
/-!
# Types with a unique term
In this file we define a typeclass `Unique`,
which expresses that a type has a unique term.
In other words, a type that is `Inhabited` and a `Subsingleton`.
## Main declaration
* `Unique`: a typeclass that expresses that a type has a unique term.
## Main statements
* `Unique.mk'`: an inhabited subsingleton type is `Unique`. This can not be an instance because it
would lead to loops in typeclass inference.
* `Function.Surjective.unique`: if the domain of a surjective function is `Unique`, then its
codomain is `Unique` as well.
* `Function.Injective.subsingleton`: if the codomain of an injective function is `Subsingleton`,
then its domain is `Subsingleton` as well.
* `Function.Injective.unique`: if the codomain of an injective function is `Subsingleton` and its
domain is `Inhabited`, then its domain is `Unique`.
## Implementation details
The typeclass `Unique α` is implemented as a type,
rather than a `Prop`-valued predicate,
for good definitional properties of the default term.
-/
universe u v w
/-- `Unique α` expresses that `α` is a type with a unique term `default`.
This is implemented as a type, rather than a `Prop`-valued predicate,
for good definitional properties of the default term. -/
@[ext]
structure Unique (α : Sort u) extends Inhabited α where
/-- In a `Unique` type, every term is equal to the default element (from `Inhabited`). -/
uniq : ∀ a : α, a = default
#align unique Unique
#align unique.ext_iff Unique.ext_iff
#align unique.ext Unique.ext
attribute [class] Unique
-- The simplifier can already prove this using `eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton`
attribute [nolint simpNF] Unique.mk.injEq
theorem unique_iff_exists_unique (α : Sort u) : Nonempty (Unique α) ↔ ∃! _ : α, True :=
⟨fun ⟨u⟩ ↦ ⟨u.default, trivial, fun a _ ↦ u.uniq a⟩,
fun ⟨a, _, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨⟨a⟩, fun _ ↦ h _ trivial⟩⟩⟩
#align unique_iff_exists_unique unique_iff_exists_unique
theorem unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique {α} (p : α → Prop) :
Nonempty (Unique (Subtype p)) ↔ ∃! a, p a :=
⟨fun ⟨u⟩ ↦ ⟨u.default.1, u.default.2, fun a h ↦ congr_arg Subtype.val (u.uniq ⟨a, h⟩)⟩,
fun ⟨a, ha, he⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ by
congr
exact he b hb⟩⟩⟩
#align unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique
/-- Given an explicit `a : α` with `Subsingleton α`, we can construct
a `Unique α` instance. This is a def because the typeclass search cannot
arbitrarily invent the `a : α` term. Nevertheless, these instances are all
equivalent by `Unique.Subsingleton.unique`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev uniqueOfSubsingleton {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (a : α) : Unique α where
default := a
uniq _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align unique_of_subsingleton uniqueOfSubsingleton
instance PUnit.unique : Unique PUnit.{u} where
default := PUnit.unit
uniq x := subsingleton x _
-- Porting note:
-- This should not require a nolint,
-- but it is currently failing due to a problem in the linter discussed at
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.60simpNF.60.20error.20.22unknown.20metavariable.22
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem PUnit.default_eq_unit : (default : PUnit) = PUnit.unit :=
rfl
#align punit.default_eq_star PUnit.default_eq_unit
/-- Every provable proposition is unique, as all proofs are equal. -/
def uniqueProp {p : Prop} (h : p) : Unique.{0} p where
default := h
uniq _ := rfl
#align unique_prop uniqueProp
instance : Unique True :=
uniqueProp trivial
namespace Unique
open Function
section
variable {α : Sort*} [Unique α]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) : Inhabited α :=
toInhabited ‹Unique α›
theorem eq_default (a : α) : a = default :=
uniq _ a
#align unique.eq_default Unique.eq_default
theorem default_eq (a : α) : default = a :=
(uniq _ a).symm
#align unique.default_eq Unique.default_eq
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) instSubsingleton : Subsingleton α :=
subsingleton_of_forall_eq _ eq_default
theorem forall_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a, p a) ↔ p default :=
⟨fun h ↦ h _, fun h x ↦ by rwa [Unique.eq_default x]⟩
#align unique.forall_iff Unique.forall_iff
theorem exists_iff {p : α → Prop} : Exists p ↔ p default :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ eq_default a ▸ ha, Exists.intro default⟩
#align unique.exists_iff Unique.exists_iff
end
variable {α : Sort*}
@[ext]
protected theorem subsingleton_unique' : ∀ h₁ h₂ : Unique α, h₁ = h₂
| ⟨⟨x⟩, h⟩, ⟨⟨y⟩, _⟩ => by congr; rw [h x, h y]
#align unique.subsingleton_unique' Unique.subsingleton_unique'
instance subsingleton_unique : Subsingleton (Unique α) :=
⟨Unique.subsingleton_unique'⟩
/-- Construct `Unique` from `Inhabited` and `Subsingleton`. Making this an instance would create
a loop in the class inheritance graph. -/
abbrev mk' (α : Sort u) [h₁ : Inhabited α] [Subsingleton α] : Unique α :=
{ h₁ with uniq := fun _ ↦ Subsingleton.elim _ _ }
#align unique.mk' Unique.mk'
end Unique
theorem unique_iff_subsingleton_and_nonempty (α : Sort u) :
Nonempty (Unique α) ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun ⟨u⟩ ↦ by constructor <;> exact inferInstance,
fun ⟨hs, hn⟩ ↦ ⟨by inhabit α; exact Unique.mk' α⟩⟩
#align unique_iff_subsingleton_and_nonempty unique_iff_subsingleton_and_nonempty
variable {α : Sort*}
@[simp]
theorem Pi.default_def {β : α → Sort v} [∀ a, Inhabited (β a)] :
@default (∀ a, β a) _ = fun a : α ↦ @default (β a) _ :=
rfl
#align pi.default_def Pi.default_def
theorem Pi.default_apply {β : α → Sort v} [∀ a, Inhabited (β a)] (a : α) :
@default (∀ a, β a) _ a = default :=
rfl
#align pi.default_apply Pi.default_apply
instance Pi.unique {β : α → Sort v} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] : Unique (∀ a, β a) where
uniq := fun _ ↦ funext fun _ ↦ Unique.eq_default _
/-- There is a unique function on an empty domain. -/
instance Pi.uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] (β : α → Sort v) : Unique (∀ a, β a) where
default := isEmptyElim
uniq _ := funext isEmptyElim
theorem eq_const_of_subsingleton {β : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) (a : α) :
f = Function.const α (f a) :=
funext fun x ↦ Subsingleton.elim x a ▸ rfl
theorem eq_const_of_unique {β : Sort*} [Unique α] (f : α → β) : f = Function.const α (f default) :=
eq_const_of_subsingleton ..
#align eq_const_of_unique eq_const_of_unique
theorem heq_const_of_unique [Unique α] {β : α → Sort v} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
HEq f (Function.const α (f default)) :=
(Function.hfunext rfl) fun i _ _ ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim i default]; rfl
#align heq_const_of_unique heq_const_of_unique
namespace Function
variable {β : Sort*} {f : α → β}
/-- If the codomain of an injective function is a subsingleton, then the domain
is a subsingleton as well. -/
protected theorem Injective.subsingleton (hf : Injective f) [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun _ _ ↦ hf <| Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
#align function.injective.subsingleton Function.Injective.subsingleton
/-- If the domain of a surjective function is a subsingleton, then the codomain is a subsingleton as
well. -/
protected theorem Surjective.subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hf : Surjective f) : Subsingleton β :=
⟨hf.forall₂.2 fun x y ↦ congr_arg f <| Subsingleton.elim x y⟩
#align function.surjective.subsingleton Function.Surjective.subsingleton
/-- If the domain of a surjective function is a singleton,
then the codomain is a singleton as well. -/
protected def Surjective.unique {α : Sort u} (f : α → β) (hf : Surjective f) [Unique.{u} α] :
Unique β :=
@Unique.mk' _ ⟨f default⟩ hf.subsingleton
#align function.surjective.unique Function.Surjective.unique
/-- If `α` is inhabited and admits an injective map to a subsingleton type, then `α` is `Unique`. -/
protected def Injective.unique [Inhabited α] [Subsingleton β] (hf : Injective f) : Unique α :=
@Unique.mk' _ _ hf.subsingleton
#align function.injective.unique Function.Injective.unique
/-- If a constant function is surjective, then the codomain is a singleton. -/
def Surjective.uniqueOfSurjectiveConst (α : Type*) {β : Type*} (b : β)
(h : Function.Surjective (Function.const α b)) : Unique β :=
@uniqueOfSubsingleton _ (subsingleton_of_forall_eq b <| h.forall.mpr fun _ ↦ rfl) b
#align function.surjective.unique_of_surjective_const Function.Surjective.uniqueOfSurjectiveConst
end Function
section Pi
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : ι → Sort*}
/-- Given one value over a unique, we get a dependent function. -/
def uniqueElim [Unique ι] (x : α (default : ι)) (i : ι) : α i := by
rw [Unique.eq_default i]
exact x
@[simp]
theorem uniqueElim_default {_ : Unique ι} (x : α (default : ι)) : uniqueElim x (default : ι) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem uniqueElim_const {β : Sort*} {_ : Unique ι} (x : β) (i : ι) :
uniqueElim (α := fun _ ↦ β) x i = x :=
rfl
end Pi
-- TODO: Mario turned this off as a simp lemma in Batteries, wanting to profile it.
attribute [local simp] eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton in
| Mathlib/Logic/Unique.lean | 259 | 261 | theorem Unique.bijective {A B} [Unique A] [Unique B] {f : A → B} : Function.Bijective f := by |
rw [Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse]
refine ⟨default, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> intro x <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.l2Space
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ContinuousMapDense
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Periodic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.StoneWeierstrass
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FundThmCalculus
#align_import analysis.fourier.add_circle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8f9fea08977f7e450770933ee6abb20733b47c92"
/-!
# Fourier analysis on the additive circle
This file contains basic results on Fourier series for functions on the additive circle
`AddCircle T = ℝ / ℤ • T`.
## Main definitions
* `haarAddCircle`, Haar measure on `AddCircle T`, normalized to have total measure `1`. (Note
that this is not the same normalisation as the standard measure defined in `Integral.Periodic`,
so we do not declare it as a `MeasureSpace` instance, to avoid confusion.)
* for `n : ℤ`, `fourier n` is the monomial `fun x => exp (2 π i n x / T)`,
bundled as a continuous map from `AddCircle T` to `ℂ`.
* `fourierBasis` is the Hilbert basis of `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle` given by the images of the
monomials `fourier n`.
* `fourierCoeff f n`, for `f : AddCircle T → E` (with `E` a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space), is
the `n`-th Fourier coefficient of `f`, defined as an integral over `AddCircle T`. The lemma
`fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, a + T]` for any real
`a`.
* `fourierCoeffOn`, for `f : ℝ → E` and `a < b` reals, is the `n`-th Fourier
coefficient of the unique periodic function of period `b - a` which agrees with `f` on `(a, b]`.
The lemma `fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, b]`.
## Main statements
The theorem `span_fourier_closure_eq_top` states that the span of the monomials `fourier n` is
dense in `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`, i.e. that its `Submodule.topologicalClosure` is `⊤`. This follows
from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem after checking that the span is a subalgebra, is closed under
conjugation, and separates points.
Using this and general theory on approximation of Lᵖ functions by continuous functions, we deduce
(`span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top`) that for any `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the span of the Fourier monomials is
dense in the Lᵖ space of `AddCircle T`. For `p = 2` we show (`orthonormal_fourier`) that the
monomials are also orthonormal, so they form a Hilbert basis for L², which is named as
`fourierBasis`; in particular, for `L²` functions `f`, the Fourier series of `f` converges to `f`
in the `L²` topology (`hasSum_fourier_series_L2`). Parseval's identity, `tsum_sq_fourierCoeff`, is
a direct consequence.
For continuous maps `f : AddCircle T → ℂ`, the theorem
`hasSum_fourier_series_of_summable` states that if the sequence of Fourier
coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series `∑ (i : ℤ), fourierCoeff f i * fourier i`
converges to `f` in the uniform-convergence topology of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped ENNReal ComplexConjugate Real
open TopologicalSpace ContinuousMap MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Algebra Submodule Set
variable {T : ℝ}
namespace AddCircle
/-! ### Measure on `AddCircle T`
In this file we use the Haar measure on `AddCircle T` normalised to have total measure 1 (which is
**not** the same as the standard measure defined in `Topology.Instances.AddCircle`). -/
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- Haar measure on the additive circle, normalised to have total measure 1. -/
def haarAddCircle : Measure (AddCircle T) :=
addHaarMeasure ⊤
#align add_circle.haar_add_circle AddCircle.haarAddCircle
-- Porting note: was `deriving IsAddHaarMeasure` on `haarAddCircle`
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
Measure.isAddHaarMeasure_addHaarMeasure ⊤
instance : IsProbabilityMeasure (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
IsProbabilityMeasure.mk addHaarMeasure_self
theorem volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle :
(volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) = ENNReal.ofReal T • (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
rfl
#align add_circle.volume_eq_smul_haar_add_circle AddCircle.volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle
end AddCircle
open AddCircle
section Monomials
/-- The family of exponential monomials `fun x => exp (2 π i n x / T)`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and
considered as bundled continuous maps from `ℝ / ℤ • T` to `ℂ`. -/
def fourier (n : ℤ) : C(AddCircle T, ℂ) where
toFun x := toCircle (n • x :)
continuous_toFun := continuous_induced_dom.comp <| continuous_toCircle.comp <| continuous_zsmul _
#align fourier fourier
@[simp]
theorem fourier_apply {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier n x = toCircle (n • x :) :=
rfl
#align fourier_apply fourier_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_coe_apply'`
theorem fourier_coe_apply {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
fourier n (x : AddCircle T) = Complex.exp (2 * π * Complex.I * n * x / T) := by
rw [fourier_apply, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, toCircle, Function.Periodic.lift_coe,
expMapCircle_apply, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_div, Complex.ofReal_mul, zsmul_eq_mul,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_intCast]
norm_num
congr 1; ring
#align fourier_coe_apply fourier_coe_apply
@[simp]
theorem fourier_coe_apply' {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
toCircle (n • (x : AddCircle T) :) = Complex.exp (2 * π * Complex.I * n * x / T) := by
rw [← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_coe_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_zero'`
theorem fourier_zero {x : AddCircle T} : fourier 0 x = 1 := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp only [fourier_coe_apply]
norm_num
#align fourier_zero fourier_zero
@[simp]
theorem fourier_zero' {x : AddCircle T} : @toCircle T 0 = (1 : ℂ) := by
have : fourier 0 x = @toCircle T 0 := by rw [fourier_apply, zero_smul]
rw [← this]; exact fourier_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is *also* `fourier_zero'`
theorem fourier_eval_zero (n : ℤ) : fourier n (0 : AddCircle T) = 1 := by
rw [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, fourier_coe_apply, Complex.ofReal_zero, mul_zero,
zero_div, Complex.exp_zero]
#align fourier_eval_zero fourier_eval_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem fourier_one {x : AddCircle T} : fourier 1 x = toCircle x := by rw [fourier_apply, one_zsmul]
#align fourier_one fourier_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_neg'`
theorem fourier_neg {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier (-n) x = conj (fourier n x) := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp_rw [fourier_apply, toCircle]
rw [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul]
simp_rw [Function.Periodic.lift_coe, ← coe_inv_circle_eq_conj, ← expMapCircle_neg,
neg_smul, mul_neg]
#align fourier_neg fourier_neg
@[simp]
theorem fourier_neg' {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : @toCircle T (-(n • x)) = conj (fourier n x) := by
rw [← neg_smul, ← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_neg
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_add'`
theorem fourier_add {m n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier (m+n) x = fourier m x * fourier n x := by
simp_rw [fourier_apply, add_zsmul, toCircle_add, coe_mul_unitSphere]
#align fourier_add fourier_add
@[simp]
theorem fourier_add' {m n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} :
toCircle ((m + n) • x :) = fourier m x * fourier n x := by
rw [← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_add
theorem fourier_norm [Fact (0 < T)] (n : ℤ) : ‖@fourier T n‖ = 1 := by
rw [ContinuousMap.norm_eq_iSup_norm]
have : ∀ x : AddCircle T, ‖fourier n x‖ = 1 := fun x => abs_coe_circle _
simp_rw [this]
exact @ciSup_const _ _ _ Zero.instNonempty _
#align fourier_norm fourier_norm
/-- For `n ≠ 0`, a translation by `T / 2 / n` negates the function `fourier n`. -/
theorem fourier_add_half_inv_index {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hT : 0 < T) (x : AddCircle T) :
@fourier T n (x + ↑(T / 2 / n)) = -fourier n x := by
rw [fourier_apply, zsmul_add, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, toCircle_add, coe_mul_unitSphere]
have : (n : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by simpa using hn
have : (@toCircle T (n • (T / 2 / n) : ℝ) : ℂ) = -1 := by
rw [zsmul_eq_mul, toCircle, Function.Periodic.lift_coe, expMapCircle_apply]
replace hT := Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hT.ne'
convert Complex.exp_pi_mul_I using 3
field_simp; ring
rw [this]; simp
#align fourier_add_half_inv_index fourier_add_half_inv_index
/-- The star subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` . -/
def fourierSubalgebra : StarSubalgebra ℂ C(AddCircle T, ℂ) where
toSubalgebra := Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range fourier)
star_mem' := by
show Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range (fourier (T := T))) ≤
star (Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range (fourier (T := T))))
refine adjoin_le ?_
rintro - ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact subset_adjoin ⟨-n, ext fun _ => fourier_neg⟩
#align fourier_subalgebra fourierSubalgebra
/-- The star subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is in fact the
linear span of these functions. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_coe :
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (@fourierSubalgebra T).toSubalgebra = span ℂ (range (@fourier T)) := by
apply adjoin_eq_span_of_subset
refine Subset.trans ?_ Submodule.subset_span
intro x hx
refine Submonoid.closure_induction hx (fun _ => id) ⟨0, ?_⟩ ?_
· ext1 z; exact fourier_zero
· rintro _ _ ⟨m, rfl⟩ ⟨n, rfl⟩
refine ⟨m + n, ?_⟩
ext1 z
exact fourier_add
#align fourier_subalgebra_coe fourierSubalgebra_coe
/- a post-port refactor made `fourierSubalgebra` into a `StarSubalgebra`, and eliminated
`conjInvariantSubalgebra` entirely, making this lemma irrelevant. -/
#noalign fourier_subalgebra_conj_invariant
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- The subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ`
separates points. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_separatesPoints : (@fourierSubalgebra T).SeparatesPoints := by
intro x y hxy
refine ⟨_, ⟨fourier 1, subset_adjoin ⟨1, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
dsimp only; rw [fourier_one, fourier_one]
contrapose! hxy
rw [Subtype.coe_inj] at hxy
exact injective_toCircle hT.elim.ne' hxy
#align fourier_subalgebra_separates_points fourierSubalgebra_separatesPoints
/-- The subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is dense. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_closure_eq_top : (@fourierSubalgebra T).topologicalClosure = ⊤ :=
ContinuousMap.starSubalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints fourierSubalgebra
fourierSubalgebra_separatesPoints
#align fourier_subalgebra_closure_eq_top fourierSubalgebra_closure_eq_top
/-- The linear span of the monomials `fourier n` is dense in `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`. -/
theorem span_fourier_closure_eq_top : (span ℂ (range <| @fourier T)).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [← fourierSubalgebra_coe]
exact congr_arg (Subalgebra.toSubmodule <| StarSubalgebra.toSubalgebra ·)
fourierSubalgebra_closure_eq_top
#align span_fourier_closure_eq_top span_fourier_closure_eq_top
/-- The family of monomials `fourier n`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and considered as
elements of the `Lp` space of functions `AddCircle T → ℂ`. -/
abbrev fourierLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (n : ℤ) : Lp ℂ p (@haarAddCircle T hT) :=
toLp (E := ℂ) p haarAddCircle ℂ (fourier n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align fourier_Lp fourierLp
theorem coeFn_fourierLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (n : ℤ) :
@fourierLp T hT p _ n =ᵐ[haarAddCircle] fourier n :=
coeFn_toLp haarAddCircle (fourier n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align coe_fn_fourier_Lp coeFn_fourierLp
/-- For each `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the linear span of the monomials `fourier n` is dense in
`Lp ℂ p haarAddCircle`. -/
theorem span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top {p : ℝ≥0∞} [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hp : p ≠ ∞) :
(span ℂ (range (@fourierLp T _ p _))).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
convert
(ContinuousMap.toLp_denseRange ℂ (@haarAddCircle T hT) hp ℂ).topologicalClosure_map_submodule
span_fourier_closure_eq_top
erw [map_span, range_comp]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align span_fourier_Lp_closure_eq_top span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top
/-- The monomials `fourier n` are an orthonormal set with respect to normalised Haar measure. -/
theorem orthonormal_fourier : Orthonormal ℂ (@fourierLp T _ 2 _) := by
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite]
intro i j
rw [ContinuousMap.inner_toLp (@haarAddCircle T hT) (fourier i) (fourier j)]
simp_rw [← fourier_neg, ← fourier_add]
split_ifs with h
· simp_rw [h, neg_add_self]
have : ⇑(@fourier T 0) = (fun _ => 1 : AddCircle T → ℂ) := by ext1; exact fourier_zero
rw [this, integral_const, measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, Complex.real_smul,
Complex.ofReal_one, mul_one]
have hij : -i + j ≠ 0 := by
rw [add_comm]
exact sub_ne_zero.mpr (Ne.symm h)
convert integral_eq_zero_of_add_right_eq_neg (μ := haarAddCircle)
(fourier_add_half_inv_index hij hT.elim)
#align orthonormal_fourier orthonormal_fourier
end Monomials
section ScopeHT
-- everything from here on needs `0 < T`
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
section fourierCoeff
variable {E : Type} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]
/-- The `n`-th Fourier coefficient of a function `AddCircle T → E`, for `E` a complete normed
`ℂ`-vector space, defined as the integral over `AddCircle T` of `fourier (-n) t • f t`. -/
def fourierCoeff (f : AddCircle T → E) (n : ℤ) : E :=
∫ t : AddCircle T, fourier (-n) t • f t ∂haarAddCircle
#align fourier_coeff fourierCoeff
/-- The Fourier coefficients of a function on `AddCircle T` can be computed as an integral
over `[a, a + T]`, for any real `a`. -/
theorem fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral (f : AddCircle T → E) (n : ℤ) (a : ℝ) :
fourierCoeff f n = (1 / T) • ∫ x in a..a + T, @fourier T (-n) x • f x := by
have : ∀ x : ℝ, @fourier T (-n) x • f x = (fun z : AddCircle T => @fourier T (-n) z • f z) x := by
intro x; rfl
-- After leanprover/lean4#3124, we need to add `singlePass := true` to avoid an infinite loop.
simp_rw (config := {singlePass := true}) [this]
rw [fourierCoeff, AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage T a (fun z => _ • _),
volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle, integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hT.out.le,
← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hT.out.ne', one_smul]
#align fourier_coeff_eq_interval_integral fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral
theorem fourierCoeff.const_smul (f : AddCircle T → E) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (c • f :) n = c • fourierCoeff f n := by
simp_rw [fourierCoeff, Pi.smul_apply, ← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul,
smul_assoc, integral_smul]
#align fourier_coeff.const_smul fourierCoeff.const_smul
theorem fourierCoeff.const_mul (f : AddCircle T → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (fun x => c * f x) n = c * fourierCoeff f n :=
fourierCoeff.const_smul f c n
#align fourier_coeff.const_mul fourierCoeff.const_mul
/-- For a function on `ℝ`, the Fourier coefficients of `f` on `[a, b]` are defined as the
Fourier coefficients of the unique periodic function agreeing with `f` on `Ioc a b`. -/
def fourierCoeffOn {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℤ) : E :=
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIoc (b - a) a f) n
#align fourier_coeff_on fourierCoeffOn
theorem fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab f n =
(1 / (b - a)) • ∫ x in a..b, fourier (-n) (x : AddCircle (b - a)) • f x := by
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
rw [fourierCoeffOn, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral _ _ a, add_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
congr 1
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hab.le]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
rw [liftIoc_coe_apply]
rwa [add_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
#align fourier_coeff_on_eq_integral fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral
theorem fourierCoeffOn.const_smul {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab (c • f) n = c • fourierCoeffOn hab f n := by
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
apply fourierCoeff.const_smul
#align fourier_coeff_on.const_smul fourierCoeffOn.const_smul
theorem fourierCoeffOn.const_mul {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab (fun x => c * f x) n = c * fourierCoeffOn hab f n :=
fourierCoeffOn.const_smul _ _ _ _
#align fourier_coeff_on.const_mul fourierCoeffOn.const_mul
theorem fourierCoeff_liftIoc_eq {a : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIoc T a f) n =
fourierCoeffOn (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out) f n := by
rw [fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral, add_sub_cancel_left a T]
· congr 1
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae (ae_of_all _ fun x hx => ?_)
rw [liftIoc_coe_apply]
rwa [uIoc_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out).le] at hx
#align fourier_coeff_lift_Ioc_eq fourierCoeff_liftIoc_eq
theorem fourierCoeff_liftIco_eq {a : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIco T a f) n =
fourierCoeffOn (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out) f n := by
rw [fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral _ _ a, add_sub_cancel_left a T]
congr 1
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out).le]
iterate 2 rw [integral_Ioc_eq_integral_Ioo]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioo fun x hx => ?_
rw [liftIco_coe_apply (Ioo_subset_Ico_self hx)]
#align fourier_coeff_lift_Ico_eq fourierCoeff_liftIco_eq
end fourierCoeff
section FourierL2
/-- We define `fourierBasis` to be a `ℤ`-indexed Hilbert basis for `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle`,
which by definition is an isometric isomorphism from `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle` to `ℓ²(ℤ, ℂ)`. -/
def fourierBasis : HilbertBasis ℤ ℂ (Lp ℂ 2 <| @haarAddCircle T hT) :=
HilbertBasis.mk orthonormal_fourier (span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top (by norm_num)).ge
#align fourier_basis fourierBasis
/-- The elements of the Hilbert basis `fourierBasis` are the functions `fourierLp 2`, i.e. the
monomials `fourier n` on the circle considered as elements of `L²`. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_fourierBasis : ⇑(@fourierBasis T hT) = @fourierLp T hT 2 _ :=
HilbertBasis.coe_mk _ _
#align coe_fourier_basis coe_fourierBasis
/-- Under the isometric isomorphism `fourierBasis` from `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle` to `ℓ²(ℤ, ℂ)`, the
`i`-th coefficient is `fourierCoeff f i`, i.e., the integral over `AddCircle T` of
`fun t => fourier (-i) t * f t` with respect to the Haar measure of total mass 1. -/
theorem fourierBasis_repr (f : Lp ℂ 2 <| @haarAddCircle T hT) (i : ℤ) :
fourierBasis.repr f i = fourierCoeff f i := by
trans ∫ t : AddCircle T, conj ((@fourierLp T hT 2 _ i : AddCircle T → ℂ) t) * f t ∂haarAddCircle
· rw [fourierBasis.repr_apply_apply f i, MeasureTheory.L2.inner_def, coe_fourierBasis]
simp only [RCLike.inner_apply]
· apply integral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [coeFn_fourierLp 2 i] with _ ht
rw [ht, ← fourier_neg, smul_eq_mul]
#align fourier_basis_repr fourierBasis_repr
/-- The Fourier series of an `L2` function `f` sums to `f`, in the `L²` space of `AddCircle T`. -/
theorem hasSum_fourier_series_L2 (f : Lp ℂ 2 <| @haarAddCircle T hT) :
HasSum (fun i => fourierCoeff f i • fourierLp 2 i) f := by
simp_rw [← fourierBasis_repr]; rw [← coe_fourierBasis]
exact HilbertBasis.hasSum_repr fourierBasis f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_sum_fourier_series_L2 hasSum_fourier_series_L2
/-- **Parseval's identity**: for an `L²` function `f` on `AddCircle T`, the sum of the squared
norms of the Fourier coefficients equals the `L²` norm of `f`. -/
theorem tsum_sq_fourierCoeff (f : Lp ℂ 2 <| @haarAddCircle T hT) :
∑' i : ℤ, ‖fourierCoeff f i‖ ^ 2 = ∫ t : AddCircle T, ‖f t‖ ^ 2 ∂haarAddCircle := by
simp_rw [← fourierBasis_repr]
have H₁ : ‖fourierBasis.repr f‖ ^ 2 = ∑' i, ‖fourierBasis.repr f i‖ ^ 2 := by
apply_mod_cast lp.norm_rpow_eq_tsum ?_ (fourierBasis.repr f)
norm_num
have H₂ : ‖fourierBasis.repr f‖ ^ 2 = ‖f‖ ^ 2 := by simp
have H₃ := congr_arg RCLike.re (@L2.inner_def (AddCircle T) ℂ ℂ _ _ _ _ _ f f)
rw [← integral_re] at H₃
· simp only [← norm_sq_eq_inner] at H₃
rw [← H₁, H₂, H₃]
· exact L2.integrable_inner f f
#align tsum_sq_fourier_coeff tsum_sq_fourierCoeff
end FourierL2
section Convergence
variable (f : C(AddCircle T, ℂ))
theorem fourierCoeff_toLp (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (toLp (E := ℂ) 2 haarAddCircle ℂ f) n = fourierCoeff f n :=
integral_congr_ae (Filter.EventuallyEq.mul (Filter.eventually_of_forall (by tauto))
(ContinuousMap.coeFn_toAEEqFun haarAddCircle f))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align fourier_coeff_to_Lp fourierCoeff_toLp
variable {f}
/-- If the sequence of Fourier coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series converges
uniformly to `f`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/AddCircle.lean | 459 | 465 | theorem hasSum_fourier_series_of_summable (h : Summable (fourierCoeff f)) :
HasSum (fun i => fourierCoeff f i • fourier i) f := by |
have sum_L2 := hasSum_fourier_series_L2 (toLp (E := ℂ) 2 haarAddCircle ℂ f)
simp_rw [fourierCoeff_toLp] at sum_L2
refine ContinuousMap.hasSum_of_hasSum_Lp (.of_norm ?_) sum_L2
simp_rw [norm_smul, fourier_norm, mul_one]
exact h.norm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Benjamin Davidson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Benjamin Davidson, Devon Tuma, Eric Rodriguez, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Group
#align_import topology.algebra.order.field from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9a59dcb7a2d06bf55da57b9030169219980660cd"
/-!
# Topologies on linear ordered fields
In this file we prove that a linear ordered field with order topology has continuous multiplication
and division (apart from zero in the denominator). We also prove theorems like
`Filter.Tendsto.mul_atTop`: if `f` tends to a positive number and `g` tends to positive infinity,
then `f * g` tends to positive infinity.
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Pointwise Topology
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
/-- If a (possibly non-unital and/or non-associative) ring `R` admits a submultiplicative
nonnegative norm `norm : R → 𝕜`, where `𝕜` is a linear ordered field, and the open balls
`{ x | norm x < ε }`, `ε > 0`, form a basis of neighborhoods of zero, then `R` is a topological
ring. -/
theorem TopologicalRing.of_norm {R 𝕜 : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [LinearOrderedField 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalAddGroup R] (norm : R → 𝕜)
(norm_nonneg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ norm x) (norm_mul_le : ∀ x y, norm (x * y) ≤ norm x * norm y)
(nhds_basis : (𝓝 (0 : R)).HasBasis ((0 : 𝕜) < ·) (fun ε ↦ { x | norm x < ε })) :
TopologicalRing R := by
have h0 : ∀ f : R → R, ∀ c ≥ (0 : 𝕜), (∀ x, norm (f x) ≤ c * norm x) →
Tendsto f (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) := by
refine fun f c c0 hf ↦ (nhds_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis).2 fun ε ε0 ↦ ?_
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε0 c with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨δ, δ0, fun x hx ↦ (hf _).trans_lt ?_⟩
exact (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_of_lt hx) c0).trans_lt hδ
apply TopologicalRing.of_addGroup_of_nhds_zero
case hmul =>
refine ((nhds_basis.prod nhds_basis).tendsto_iff nhds_basis).2 fun ε ε0 ↦ ?_
refine ⟨(1, ε), ⟨one_pos, ε0⟩, fun (x, y) ⟨hx, hy⟩ => ?_⟩
simp only [sub_zero] at *
calc norm (x * y) ≤ norm x * norm y := norm_mul_le _ _
_ < ε := mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt_of_nonneg hx.le hy (norm_nonneg _)
case hmul_left => exact fun x => h0 _ (norm x) (norm_nonneg _) (norm_mul_le x)
case hmul_right =>
exact fun y => h0 (· * y) (norm y) (norm_nonneg y) fun x =>
(norm_mul_le x y).trans_eq (mul_comm _ _)
variable {𝕜 α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
{l : Filter α} {f g : α → 𝕜}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedField.topologicalRing : TopologicalRing 𝕜 :=
.of_norm abs abs_nonneg (fun _ _ ↦ (abs_mul _ _).le) <| by
simpa using nhds_basis_abs_sub_lt (0 : 𝕜)
/-- In a linearly ordered field with the order topology, if `f` tends to `Filter.atTop` and `g`
tends to a positive constant `C` then `f * g` tends to `Filter.atTop`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul {C : 𝕜} (hC : 0 < C) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop)
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 C)) : Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atTop := by
refine tendsto_atTop_mono' _ ?_ (hf.atTop_mul_const (half_pos hC))
filter_upwards [hg.eventually (lt_mem_nhds (half_lt_self hC)), hf.eventually_ge_atTop 0]
with x hg hf using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hg.le hf
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_mul Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul
/-- In a linearly ordered field with the order topology, if `f` tends to a positive constant `C` and
`g` tends to `Filter.atTop` then `f * g` tends to `Filter.atTop`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.mul_atTop {C : 𝕜} (hC : 0 < C) (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 C))
(hg : Tendsto g l atTop) : Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atTop := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using hg.atTop_mul hC hf
#align filter.tendsto.mul_at_top Filter.Tendsto.mul_atTop
/-- In a linearly ordered field with the order topology, if `f` tends to `Filter.atTop` and `g`
tends to a negative constant `C` then `f * g` tends to `Filter.atBot`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul_neg {C : 𝕜} (hC : C < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l atTop)
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 C)) : Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atBot := by
have := hf.atTop_mul (neg_pos.2 hC) hg.neg
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, neg_neg] using tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot.comp this
#align filter.tendsto.at_top_mul_neg Filter.Tendsto.atTop_mul_neg
/-- In a linearly ordered field with the order topology, if `f` tends to a negative constant `C` and
`g` tends to `Filter.atTop` then `f * g` tends to `Filter.atBot`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.neg_mul_atTop {C : 𝕜} (hC : C < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 C))
(hg : Tendsto g l atTop) : Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atBot := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using hg.atTop_mul_neg hC hf
#align filter.tendsto.neg_mul_at_top Filter.Tendsto.neg_mul_atTop
/-- In a linearly ordered field with the order topology, if `f` tends to `Filter.atBot` and `g`
tends to a positive constant `C` then `f * g` tends to `Filter.atBot`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.atBot_mul {C : 𝕜} (hC : 0 < C) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot)
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 C)) : Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atBot := by
have := (tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop.comp hf).atTop_mul hC hg
simpa [(· ∘ ·)] using tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot.comp this
#align filter.tendsto.at_bot_mul Filter.Tendsto.atBot_mul
/-- In a linearly ordered field with the order topology, if `f` tends to `Filter.atBot` and `g`
tends to a negative constant `C` then `f * g` tends to `Filter.atTop`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.atBot_mul_neg {C : 𝕜} (hC : C < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l atBot)
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 C)) : Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atTop := by
have := (tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop.comp hf).atTop_mul_neg hC hg
simpa [(· ∘ ·)] using tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop.comp this
#align filter.tendsto.at_bot_mul_neg Filter.Tendsto.atBot_mul_neg
/-- In a linearly ordered field with the order topology, if `f` tends to a positive constant `C` and
`g` tends to `Filter.atBot` then `f * g` tends to `Filter.atBot`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.mul_atBot {C : 𝕜} (hC : 0 < C) (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 C))
(hg : Tendsto g l atBot) : Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atBot := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using hg.atBot_mul hC hf
#align filter.tendsto.mul_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.mul_atBot
/-- In a linearly ordered field with the order topology, if `f` tends to a negative constant `C` and
`g` tends to `Filter.atBot` then `f * g` tends to `Filter.atTop`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.neg_mul_atBot {C : 𝕜} (hC : C < 0) (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 C))
(hg : Tendsto g l atBot) : Tendsto (fun x => f x * g x) l atTop := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using hg.atBot_mul_neg hC hf
#align filter.tendsto.neg_mul_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.neg_mul_atBot
@[simp]
lemma inv_atTop₀ : (atTop : Filter 𝕜)⁻¹ = 𝓝[>] 0 :=
(((atTop_basis_Ioi' (0 : 𝕜)).map _).comp_surjective inv_surjective).eq_of_same_basis <|
(nhdsWithin_Ioi_basis _).congr (by simp) fun a ha ↦ by simp [inv_Ioi (inv_pos.2 ha)]
@[simp] lemma inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero : (𝓝[>] (0 : 𝕜))⁻¹ = atTop := by
rw [← inv_atTop₀, inv_inv]
/-- The function `x ↦ x⁻¹` tends to `+∞` on the right of `0`. -/
theorem tendsto_inv_zero_atTop : Tendsto (fun x : 𝕜 => x⁻¹) (𝓝[>] (0 : 𝕜)) atTop :=
inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero.le
#align tendsto_inv_zero_at_top tendsto_inv_zero_atTop
/-- The function `r ↦ r⁻¹` tends to `0` on the right as `r → +∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_inv_atTop_zero' : Tendsto (fun r : 𝕜 => r⁻¹) atTop (𝓝[>] (0 : 𝕜)) :=
inv_atTop₀.le
#align tendsto_inv_at_top_zero' tendsto_inv_atTop_zero'
theorem tendsto_inv_atTop_zero : Tendsto (fun r : 𝕜 => r⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_atTop_zero'.mono_right inf_le_left
#align tendsto_inv_at_top_zero tendsto_inv_atTop_zero
theorem Filter.Tendsto.div_atTop {a : 𝕜} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact mul_zero a ▸ h.mul (tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp hg)
#align filter.tendsto.div_at_top Filter.Tendsto.div_atTop
theorem Filter.Tendsto.inv_tendsto_atTop (h : Tendsto f l atTop) : Tendsto f⁻¹ l (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.inv_tendsto_at_top Filter.Tendsto.inv_tendsto_atTop
theorem Filter.Tendsto.inv_tendsto_zero (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[>] 0)) : Tendsto f⁻¹ l atTop :=
tendsto_inv_zero_atTop.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.inv_tendsto_zero Filter.Tendsto.inv_tendsto_zero
/-- The function `x^(-n)` tends to `0` at `+∞` for any positive natural `n`.
A version for positive real powers exists as `tendsto_rpow_neg_atTop`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Order/Field.lean | 160 | 162 | theorem tendsto_pow_neg_atTop {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x : 𝕜 => x ^ (-(n : ℤ))) atTop (𝓝 0) := by |
simpa only [zpow_neg, zpow_natCast] using (@tendsto_pow_atTop 𝕜 _ _ hn).inv_tendsto_atTop
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetToL1
#align_import measure_theory.integral.bochner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Bochner integral
The Bochner integral extends the definition of the Lebesgue integral to functions that map from a
measure space into a Banach space (complete normed vector space). It is constructed here by
extending the integral on simple functions.
## Main definitions
The Bochner integral is defined through the extension process described in the file `SetToL1`,
which follows these steps:
1. Define the integral of the indicator of a set. This is `weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal * x`.
`weightedSMul μ` is shown to be linear in the value `x` and `DominatedFinMeasAdditive`
(defined in the file `SetToL1`) with respect to the set `s`.
2. Define the integral on simple functions of the type `SimpleFunc α E` (notation : `α →ₛ E`)
where `E` is a real normed space. (See `SimpleFunc.integral` for details.)
3. Transfer this definition to define the integral on `L1.simpleFunc α E` (notation :
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E`), see `L1.simpleFunc.integral`. Show that this integral is a continuous linear
map from `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` to `E`.
4. Define the Bochner integral on L1 functions by extending the integral on integrable simple
functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` using `ContinuousLinearMap.extend` and the fact that the embedding of
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E` into `α →₁[μ] E` is dense.
5. Define the Bochner integral on functions as the Bochner integral of its equivalence class in L1
space, if it is in L1, and 0 otherwise.
The result of that construction is `∫ a, f a ∂μ`, which is definitionally equal to
`setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f`. Some basic properties of the integral
(like linearity) are particular cases of the properties of `setToFun` (which are described in the
file `SetToL1`).
## Main statements
1. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → E`, where `α` is a measure
space and `E` is a real normed space.
* `integral_zero` : `∫ 0 ∂μ = 0`
* `integral_add` : `∫ x, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f ∂μ + ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_neg` : `∫ x, - f x ∂μ = - ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_sub` : `∫ x, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ - ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_smul` : `∫ x, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_congr_ae` : `f =ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `norm_integral_le_integral_norm` : `‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ`
2. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → ℝ`, where `α` is a measure
space.
* `integral_nonneg_of_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos_of_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonneg` : `0 ≤ f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos` : `f ≤ 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
3. Propositions connecting the Bochner integral with the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions,
which is called `lintegral` and has the notation `∫⁻`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` :
`∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f⁺ x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f⁻ x ∂μ`,
where `f⁺` is the positive part of `f` and `f⁻` is the negative part of `f`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`
4. (In the file `DominatedConvergence`)
`tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence` : the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
5. (In the file `SetIntegral`) integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm`
* `LinearIsometry.integral_comp_comm`
## Notes
Some tips on how to prove a proposition if the API for the Bochner integral is not enough so that
you need to unfold the definition of the Bochner integral and go back to simple functions.
One method is to use the theorem `Integrable.induction` in the file `SimpleFuncDenseLp` (or one
of the related results, like `Lp.induction` for functions in `Lp`), which allows you to prove
something for an arbitrary integrable function.
Another method is using the following steps.
See `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` for a complicated example, which proves
that `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, with the first integral sign being the Bochner integral of a real-valued
function `f : α → ℝ`, and second and third integral sign being the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued
functions (called `lintegral`). The proof of `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part`
is scattered in sections with the name `posPart`.
Here are the usual steps of proving that a property `p`, say `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, holds for all
functions :
1. First go to the `L¹` space.
For example, if you see `ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal <| ‖f a‖)`, that is the norm of
`f` in `L¹` space. Rewrite using `L1.norm_of_fun_eq_lintegral_norm`.
2. Show that the set `{f ∈ L¹ | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}` is closed in `L¹` using `isClosed_eq`.
3. Show that the property holds for all simple functions `s` in `L¹` space.
Typically, you need to convert various notions to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart, using lemmas
like `L1.integral_coe_eq_integral`.
4. Since simple functions are dense in `L¹`,
```
univ = closure {s simple}
= closure {s simple | ∫ s = ∫⁻ s⁺ - ∫⁻ s⁻} : the property holds for all simple functions
⊆ closure {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}
= {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻} : closure of a closed set is itself
```
Use `isClosed_property` or `DenseRange.induction_on` for this argument.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ E` : simple functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/Integration`)
* `α →₁[μ] E` : functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable functions (defined in
`MeasureTheory/LpSpace`)
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` : simple functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable simple
functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/SimpleFuncDense`)
* `∫ a, f a ∂μ` : integral of `f` with respect to a measure `μ`
* `∫ a, f a` : integral of `f` with respect to `volume`, the default measure on the ambient type
We also define notations for integral on a set, which are described in the file
`MeasureTheory/SetIntegral`.
Note : `ₛ` is typed using `\_s`. Sometimes it shows as a box if the font is missing.
## Tags
Bochner integral, simple function, function space, Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Differentiable
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*}
section WeightedSMul
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a set `s`, return the continuous linear map `fun x => (μ s).toReal • x`. The extension
of that set function through `setToL1` gives the Bochner integral of L1 functions. -/
def weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : F →L[ℝ] F :=
(μ s).toReal • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) (x : F) :
weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal • x := by simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_apply MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} :
weightedSMul (0 : Measure α) = (0 : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1; simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_zero_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_empty {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
weightedSMul μ ∅ = (0 : F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_empty MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_empty
theorem weightedSMul_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hνs : ν s ≠ ∞) :
(weightedSMul (μ + ν) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul ν s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
rw [Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.toReal_add hμs hνs, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_add_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_add_measure
theorem weightedSMul_smul_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} :
(weightedSMul (c • μ) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = c.toReal • weightedSMul μ s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, smul_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul_measure
theorem weightedSMul_congr (s t : Set α) (hst : μ s = μ t) :
(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr 2
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_congr MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_congr
theorem weightedSMul_null {s : Set α} (h_zero : μ s = 0) : (weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = 0 := by
ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply, h_zero]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_null MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_null
theorem weightedSMul_union' (s t : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [add_apply, weightedSMul_apply,
measure_union (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr h_inter) ht,
ENNReal.toReal_add hs_finite ht_finite, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union' MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union'
@[nolint unusedArguments]
theorem weightedSMul_union (s t : Set α) (_hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t :=
weightedSMul_union' s t ht hs_finite ht_finite h_inter
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union
theorem weightedSMul_smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (c : 𝕜)
(s : Set α) (x : F) : weightedSMul μ s (c • x) = c • weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul
theorem norm_weightedSMul_le (s : Set α) : ‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ ≤ (μ s).toReal :=
calc
‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ = ‖(μ s).toReal‖ * ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F‖ :=
norm_smul (μ s).toReal (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F)
_ ≤ ‖(μ s).toReal‖ :=
((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left norm_id_le (norm_nonneg _)).trans (mul_one _).le)
_ = abs (μ s).toReal := Real.norm_eq_abs _
_ = (μ s).toReal := abs_eq_self.mpr ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.norm_weighted_smul_le MeasureTheory.norm_weightedSMul_le
theorem dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul μ : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) 1 :=
⟨weightedSMul_union, fun s _ _ => (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le⟩
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul MeasureTheory.dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_nonneg (s : Set α) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp only [weightedSMul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, coe_smul', _root_.id, coe_id', Pi.smul_apply]
exact mul_nonneg toReal_nonneg hx
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_nonneg
end WeightedSMul
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section PosPart
variable [LinearOrder E] [Zero E] [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- Positive part of a simple function. -/
def posPart (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
f.map fun b => max b 0
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function. -/
def negPart [Neg E] (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart
theorem posPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (posPart f).map norm = posPart f := by
ext; rw [map_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]; exact le_max_right _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm
theorem negPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (negPart f).map norm = negPart f := by
rw [negPart]; exact posPart_map_norm _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm
theorem posPart_sub_negPart (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : f.posPart - f.negPart = f := by
simp only [posPart, negPart]
ext a
rw [coe_sub]
exact max_zero_sub_eq_self (f a)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_sub_neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_sub_negPart
end PosPart
section Integral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of simple functions
Define the Bochner integral of simple functions of the type `α →ₛ β` where `β` is a normed group,
and prove basic property of this integral.
-/
open Finset
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {G F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α}
/-- Bochner integral of simple functions whose codomain is a real `NormedSpace`.
This is equal to `∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x` (see `integral_eq`). -/
def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) : F :=
f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_def MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_def
theorem integral_eq {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
simp [integral, setToSimpleFunc, weightedSMul_apply]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_sum_filter [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [integral_def, setToSimpleFunc_eq_sum_filter]; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_filter MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter
/-- The Bochner integral is equal to a sum over any set that includes `f.range` (except `0`). -/
theorem integral_eq_sum_of_subset [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {f : α →ₛ F} {s : Finset F}
(hs : (f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ s) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter, Finset.sum_subset hs]
rintro x - hx; rw [Finset.mem_filter, not_and_or, Ne, Classical.not_not] at hx
-- Porting note: reordered for clarity
rcases hx.symm with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range] at hx
-- Porting note: added
simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists] at hx
rw [preimage_eq_empty] <;> simp [Set.disjoint_singleton_left, hx]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_of_subset MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem integral_const {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (y : F) :
(const α y).integral μ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by
classical
calc
(const α y).integral μ = ∑ z ∈ {y}, (μ (const α y ⁻¹' {z})).toReal • z :=
integral_eq_sum_of_subset <| (filter_subset _ _).trans (range_const_subset _ _)
_ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by simp [Set.preimage] -- Porting note: added `Set.preimage`
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_piecewise_zero {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : (piecewise s hs f 0).integral μ = f.integral (μ.restrict s) := by
classical
refine (integral_eq_sum_of_subset ?_).trans
((sum_congr rfl fun y hy => ?_).trans (integral_eq_sum_filter _ _).symm)
· intro y hy
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, coe_piecewise, coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator,
mem_range_indicator] at *
rcases hy with ⟨⟨rfl, -⟩ | ⟨x, -, rfl⟩, h₀⟩
exacts [(h₀ rfl).elim, ⟨Set.mem_range_self _, h₀⟩]
· dsimp
rw [Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, indicator_preimage_of_not_mem,
Measure.restrict_apply (f.measurableSet_preimage _)]
exact fun h₀ => (mem_filter.1 hy).2 (Eq.symm h₀)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_piecewise_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_piecewise_zero
/-- Calculate the integral of `g ∘ f : α →ₛ F`, where `f` is an integrable function from `α` to `E`
and `g` is a function from `E` to `F`. We require `g 0 = 0` so that `g ∘ f` is integrable. -/
theorem map_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (g : E → F) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
(f.map g).integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) • g x :=
map_setToSimpleFunc _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_integral
/-- `SimpleFunc.integral` and `SimpleFunc.lintegral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion.
See `integral_eq_lintegral` for a simpler version. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral' {f : α →ₛ E} {g : E → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg0 : g 0 = 0)
(ht : ∀ b, g b ≠ ∞) :
(f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ g)).integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ) := by
have hf' : f.FinMeasSupp μ := integrable_iff_finMeasSupp.1 hf
simp only [← map_apply g f, lintegral_eq_lintegral]
rw [map_integral f _ hf, map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun b _ => ?_
-- Porting note: added `Function.comp_apply`
rw [smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, mul_comm, Function.comp_apply]
· rintro a -
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· rw [a0, hg0, zero_mul]; exact WithTop.zero_ne_top
· apply mul_ne_top (ht a) (hf'.meas_preimage_singleton_ne_zero a0).ne
· simp [hg0]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral'
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem integral_congr {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f.integral μ = g.integral μ :=
setToSimpleFunc_congr (weightedSMul μ) (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union hf h
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
/-- `SimpleFunc.bintegral` and `SimpleFunc.integral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →ₛ ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
f.integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ ENNReal.ofReal) :=
h_pos.mono fun a h => (ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h).symm
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral' hf]
exacts [integral_congr hf this, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, fun b => ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_add {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f + g) = integral μ f + integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_add _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_neg {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) : integral μ (-f) = -integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_neg _ weightedSMul_union hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_neg MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_neg
theorem integral_sub {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f - g) = integral μ f - integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_sub _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_sub MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_sub
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
integral μ (c • f) = c • integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_smul _ weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * (μ s).toReal) {f : α →ₛ E}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * (f.map norm).integral μ :=
calc
‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) * ‖x‖ :=
norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm f hf
_ = C * (f.map norm).integral μ := by
rw [map_integral f norm hf norm_zero]; simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_set_to_simple_func_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖f.integral μ‖ ≤ (f.map norm).integral μ := by
refine (norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm _ (fun s _ _ => ?_) hf).trans (one_mul _).le
exact (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_integral_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
theorem integral_add_measure {ν} (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + ν)) :
f.integral (μ + ν) = f.integral μ + f.integral ν := by
simp_rw [integral_def]
refine setToSimpleFunc_add_left'
(weightedSMul μ) (weightedSMul ν) (weightedSMul (μ + ν)) (fun s _ hμνs => ?_) hf
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.add_ne_top] at hμνs
rw [weightedSMul_add_measure _ _ hμνs.1 hμνs.2]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add_measure
end Integral
end SimpleFunc
namespace L1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `L1`
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖f‖ = ((toSimpleFunc f).map norm).integral μ := by
rw [norm_eq_sum_mul f, (toSimpleFunc f).map_integral norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f) norm_zero]
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_eq_integral
section PosPart
/-- Positive part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
nonrec def posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
⟨Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ), by
rcases f with ⟨f, s, hsf⟩
use s.posPart
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Lp.coe_posPart, ← hsf, AEEqFun.posPart_mk,
SimpleFunc.coe_map, mk_eq_mk]
-- Porting note: added
simp [SimpleFunc.posPart, Function.comp, EventuallyEq.rfl] ⟩
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
def negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (posPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_posPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (negPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.negPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_negPart
end PosPart
section SimpleFuncIntegral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of `L1`
Define the Bochner integral on `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` by extension from the simple functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`,
and prove basic properties of this integral. -/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] {F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space. -/
def integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : E :=
(toSimpleFunc f).integral μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral
nonrec theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ} (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc f) :
integral f = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ((toSimpleFunc f) a) ∂μ) := by
rw [integral, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h_pos]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_eq_setToL1S (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = setToL1S (weightedSMul μ) f := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_set_to_L1s MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_setToL1S
nonrec theorem integral_congr {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
integral f = integral g :=
SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g :=
setToL1S_add _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union _ _
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f :=
setToL1S_smul _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_integral_le_norm (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := by
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral]
exact (toSimpleFunc f).norm_integral_le_integral_norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_integral_le_norm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_norm
variable {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
def integralCLM' : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous ⟨⟨integral, integral_add⟩, integral_smul⟩ 1 fun f =>
le_trans (norm_integral_le_norm _) <| by rw [one_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM'
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' α E ℝ μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
local notation "Integral" => integralCLM α E μ
open ContinuousLinearMap
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖Integral‖ ≤ 1 :=
-- Porting note: Old proof was `LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _`
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one (fun f => by
rw [one_mul]
exact norm_integral_le_norm f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_Integral_le_one
section PosPart
theorem posPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (posPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).posPart := by
have eq : ∀ a, (toSimpleFunc f).posPart a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := fun a => rfl
have ae_eq : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, toSimpleFunc (posPart f) a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (posPart f), Lp.coeFn_posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ),
toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f] with _ _ h₂ h₃
convert h₂ using 1
-- Porting note: added
rw [h₃]
refine ae_eq.mono fun a h => ?_
rw [h, eq]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem negPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (negPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).negPart := by
rw [SimpleFunc.negPart, MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart]
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc (-f), neg_toSimpleFunc f]
intro a h₁ h₂
rw [h₁]
show max _ _ = max _ _
rw [h₂]
rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : integral f = ‖posPart f‖ - ‖negPart f‖ := by
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₁ : (toSimpleFunc f).posPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₂ : (toSimpleFunc f).negPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [negPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral, norm_eq_integral, ← SimpleFunc.integral_sub]
· show (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ =
((toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm - (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm).integral μ
apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
filter_upwards [ae_eq₁, ae_eq₂] with _ h₁ h₂
show _ = _ - _
rw [← h₁, ← h₂]
have := (toSimpleFunc f).posPart_sub_negPart
conv_lhs => rw [← this]
rfl
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).pos_part.congr ae_eq₁
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).neg_part.congr ae_eq₂
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end SimpleFuncIntegral
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ _ _ _ μ _
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace E]
section IntegrationInL1
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable (𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
nonrec def integralCLM' : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
(integralCLM' α E 𝕜 μ).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.uniformInducing
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM'
variable {𝕜}
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' ℝ
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM
-- Porting note: added `(E := E)` in several places below.
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space -/
irreducible_def integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : E :=
integralCLM (E := E) f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral
theorem integral_eq (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral f = integralCLM (E := E) f := by
simp only [integral]
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToL1 (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
integral f = setToL1 (E := E) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_set_to_L1 MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_setToL1
@[norm_cast]
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
L1.integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) = SimpleFunc.integral f := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral]
exact setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_L1_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral
variable (α E)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : integral (0 : α →₁[μ] E) = 0 := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_zero integralCLM
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_zero MeasureTheory.L1.integral_zero
variable {α E}
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_add integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.integral_add
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (-f) = -integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_neg integralCLM f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_neg MeasureTheory.L1.integral_neg
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_sub (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f - g) = integral f - integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_sub integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_sub
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f := by
simp only [integral]
show (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) (c • f) = c • (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) f
exact map_smul (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) c f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.integral_smul
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ μ _ _
local notation "sIntegral" => @SimpleFunc.integralCLM α E _ _ μ _
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ ≤ 1 :=
norm_setToL1_le (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) zero_le_one
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one
theorem nnnorm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖₊ ≤ 1 :=
norm_Integral_le_one
theorem norm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖integral f‖ = ‖integralCLM (E := E) f‖ := by simp only [integral]
_ ≤ ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ * ‖f‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ 1 * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right norm_Integral_le_one <| norm_nonneg _
_ = ‖f‖ := one_mul _
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_integral_le MeasureTheory.L1.norm_integral_le
theorem nnnorm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ :=
norm_integral_le f
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact L1.integralCLM.continuous
#align measure_theory.L1.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.L1.continuous_integral
section PosPart
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) :
integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖ := by
-- Use `isClosed_property` and `isClosed_eq`
refine @isClosed_property _ _ _ ((↑) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) → α →₁[μ] ℝ)
(fun f : α →₁[μ] ℝ => integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) (isClosed_eq ?_ ?_) ?_ f
· simp only [integral]
exact cont _
· refine Continuous.sub (continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_posPart)
(continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_negPart)
-- Show that the property holds for all simple functions in the `L¹` space.
· intro s
norm_cast
exact SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end IntegrationInL1
end L1
/-!
## The Bochner integral on functions
Define the Bochner integral on functions generally to be the `L1` Bochner integral, for integrable
functions, and 0 otherwise; prove its basic properties.
-/
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [hE : CompleteSpace E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
{G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
section
open scoped Classical
/-- The Bochner integral -/
irreducible_def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → G) : G :=
if _ : CompleteSpace G then
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.integral MeasureTheory.integral
end
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => integral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => integral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
section Properties
open ContinuousLinearMap MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
variable {f g : α → E} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem integral_eq (f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) := by
simp [integral, hE, hf]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq MeasureTheory.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToFun (f : α → E) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = setToFun μ (weightedSMul μ) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral, hE, L1.integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_set_to_fun MeasureTheory.integral_eq_setToFun
theorem L1.integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : L1.integral f = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral, integral_eq_setToFun]
exact (L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_integral
theorem integral_undef {f : α → G} (h : ¬Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp [integral, hG, h]
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_undef MeasureTheory.integral_undef
theorem Integrable.of_integral_ne_zero {f : α → G} (h : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≠ 0) : Integrable f μ :=
Not.imp_symm integral_undef h
theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → G} (h : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 :=
integral_undef <| not_and_of_not_left _ h
#align measure_theory.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
variable (α G)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : ∫ _ : α, (0 : G) ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_zero (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_zero MeasureTheory.integral_zero
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero' : integral μ (0 : α → G) = 0 :=
integral_zero α G
#align measure_theory.integral_zero' MeasureTheory.integral_zero'
variable {α G}
theorem integrable_of_integral_eq_one {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 1) : Integrable f μ :=
.of_integral_ne_zero <| h ▸ one_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one MeasureTheory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one
theorem integral_add {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_add (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_add MeasureTheory.integral_add
theorem integral_add' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f + g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_add hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_add' MeasureTheory.integral_add'
theorem integral_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → G} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
∫ a, ∑ i ∈ s, f i a ∂μ = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫ a, f i a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_finset_sum (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) s hf
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.integral_finset_sum
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α → G) : ∫ a, -f a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_neg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_neg MeasureTheory.integral_neg
theorem integral_neg' (f : α → G) : ∫ a, (-f) a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
#align measure_theory.integral_neg' MeasureTheory.integral_neg'
theorem integral_sub {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_sub (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_sub MeasureTheory.integral_sub
theorem integral_sub' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f - g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_sub hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_sub' MeasureTheory.integral_sub'
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 G] (c : 𝕜) (f : α → G) :
∫ a, c • f a ∂μ = c • ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_smul (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) weightedSMul_smul c f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_smul MeasureTheory.integral_smul
theorem integral_mul_left {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_smul r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_left MeasureTheory.integral_mul_left
theorem integral_mul_right {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by
simp only [mul_comm]; exact integral_mul_left r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_right MeasureTheory.integral_mul_right
theorem integral_div {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a / r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) / r := by
simpa only [← div_eq_mul_inv] using integral_mul_right r⁻¹ f
#align measure_theory.integral_div MeasureTheory.integral_div
theorem integral_congr_ae {f g : α → G} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_congr_ae (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) h
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.integral_congr_ae
-- Porting note: `nolint simpNF` added because simplify fails on left-hand side
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, (hf.toL1 f) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [MeasureTheory.integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_toL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf
· simp [MeasureTheory.integral, hG]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] G => ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.continuous_integral
theorem norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm (f : α → G) :
‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq f hf, ← Integrable.norm_toL1_eq_lintegral_norm f hf]
exact L1.norm_integral_le _
· rw [integral_undef hf, norm_zero]; exact toReal_nonneg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm
theorem ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm (f : α → G) :
(‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
exact norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm f
#align measure_theory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm MeasureTheory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_ae {f : α → G} (hf : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
simp [integral_congr_ae hf, integral_zero]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G}
(hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) {l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_zero, NNReal.tendsto_coe, ← ENNReal.tendsto_coe,
ENNReal.coe_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_set_lintegral_zero (ne_of_lt hf) hs) (fun i => zero_le _)
fun i => ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `f` is integrable, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ)
{l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) :=
hf.2.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero hs
#align measure_theory.integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias Integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ)
(hF : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f hfi hFi hF
· simp [integral, hG, tendsto_const_nhds]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_of_L1 MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_integral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi.restrict ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [hFi] with i hi using hi.restrict
· simp_rw [← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm] at hF ⊢
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds hF (fun _ ↦ zero_le')
(fun _ ↦ snorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1 := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_ s
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1' := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1'
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [FirstCountableTopology X]
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => F x a) s x₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousWithinAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_within_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousWithinAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousAt (fun x => F x a) x₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousOn_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ x ∈ s, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousOn (fun x => F x a) s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousOn_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousOn_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_on_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousOn_of_dominated
theorem continuous_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ) (h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ) (h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Continuous fun x => F x a) :
Continuous fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuous_of_dominated
/-- The Bochner integral of a real-valued function `f : α → ℝ` is the difference between the
integral of the positive part of `f` and the integral of the negative part of `f`. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ =
ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (f a) ∂μ) - ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) := by
let f₁ := hf.toL1 f
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₁ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.posPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_posPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (le_max_right _ _)]
rw [Real.coe_toNNReal', NNReal.coe_mk]
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₂ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.negPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_negPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
simp only [Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_neg]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonpos (min_le_right _ _), ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero]
rw [eq₁, eq₂, integral, dif_pos, dif_pos]
exact L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part hfi]
have h_min : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· refine hf.mono ?_
simp only [Pi.zero_apply]
intro a h
simp only [h, neg_nonpos, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfm.aemeasurable.neg
rw [h_min, zero_toReal, _root_.sub_zero]
· rw [integral_undef hfi]
simp_rw [Integrable, hfm, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, true_and_iff,
Classical.not_not] at hfi
have : ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae (hf.mono fun a h => ?_)
dsimp only
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h]
rw [this, hfi]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hf.norm]
· simp_rw [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
· filter_upwards; simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, imp_true_iff]
#align measure_theory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
rw [integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.aestronglyMeasurable,
ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hf.2)]
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (f a) : ℝ) ∂μ - ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (-f a) : ℝ) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_sub hf.real_toNNReal]
· simp
· exact hf.neg.real_toNNReal
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part
theorem integral_nonneg_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : CompleteSpace ℝ := by infer_instance
simp only [integral_def, A, L1.integral_def, dite_true, ge_iff_le]
exact setToFun_nonneg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
(fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_nonneg s) hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg_of_ae
theorem lintegral_coe_eq_integral (f : α → ℝ≥0) (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => (f x).coe_nonneg)
hfi.aestronglyMeasurable, ← ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]
convert hfi.hasFiniteIntegral
-- Porting note: `convert` no longer unfolds `HasFiniteIntegral`
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, NNReal.nnnorm_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral
theorem ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, f x ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] (‖f ·‖) := f_nn.mono fun _x hx ↦ (abs_of_nonneg hx).symm
simp_rw [integral_congr_ae this, ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hfi,
← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (this.symm.fun_comp ENNReal.ofReal)
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_eq_lintegral_of_real MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal
theorem integral_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
∫ a, (f a).toReal ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ).toReal := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hfm.ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable,
lintegral_congr_ae (ofReal_toReal_ae_eq hf)]
exact eventually_of_forall fun x => ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.integral_to_real MeasureTheory.integral_toReal
theorem lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ)
{b : ℝ≥0} : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b ↔ ∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b := by
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral f hfi, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.coe_le_coe,
Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le
theorem integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} {b : ℝ≥0} (h : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b) :
∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun a => (f a : ℝ)) μ
· exact (lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le hf).1 h
· rw [integral_undef hf]; exact b.2
#align measure_theory.integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le MeasureTheory.integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le
theorem integral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg
theorem integral_nonpos_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 := by
have hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] -f := hf.mono fun a h => by rwa [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.zero_apply, neg_nonneg]
have : 0 ≤ ∫ a, -f a ∂μ := integral_nonneg_of_ae hf
rwa [integral_neg, neg_nonneg] at this
#align measure_theory.integral_nonpos_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonpos_of_ae
theorem integral_nonpos {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
integral_nonpos_of_ae <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonpos MeasureTheory.integral_nonpos
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff,
← ENNReal.not_lt_top, ← hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal hf, hfi.2, not_true_eq_false, or_false_iff]
-- Porting note: split into parts, to make `rw` and `simp` work
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· rw [← hf.le_iff_eq, Filter.EventuallyEq, Filter.EventuallyLE]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact (ENNReal.measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfi.1.aemeasurable)
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
lemma integral_eq_iff_of_ae_le {f g : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h_le ↦ EventuallyEq.symm ?_, fun h ↦ integral_congr_ae h⟩
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero,
← integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae ((sub_nonneg_ae _ _).mpr hfg) (hg.sub hf)]
simpa [Pi.sub_apply, integral_sub hg hf, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 1,270 | 1,274 | theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by |
simp_rw [(integral_nonneg_of_ae hf).lt_iff_ne, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, @eq_comm ℝ 0,
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Pi.zero_apply,
Function.support]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Scott Morrison, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.BundledHom
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Basic
#align_import topology.category.Top.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
/-!
# Category instance for topological spaces
We introduce the bundled category `TopCat` of topological spaces together with the functors
`TopCat.discrete` and `TopCat.trivial` from the category of types to `TopCat` which equip a type
with the corresponding discrete, resp. trivial, topology. For a proof that these functors are left,
resp. right adjoint to the forgetful functor, see `Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Adjunctions`.
-/
open CategoryTheory
open TopologicalSpace
universe u
/-- The category of topological spaces and continuous maps. -/
@[to_additive existing TopCat]
def TopCat : Type (u + 1) :=
Bundled TopologicalSpace
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top TopCat
namespace TopCat
instance bundledHom : BundledHom @ContinuousMap where
toFun := @ContinuousMap.toFun
id := @ContinuousMap.id
comp := @ContinuousMap.comp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.bundled_hom TopCat.bundledHom
deriving instance LargeCategory for TopCat
-- Porting note: currently no derive handler for ConcreteCategory
-- see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
instance concreteCategory : ConcreteCategory TopCat :=
inferInstanceAs <| ConcreteCategory (Bundled TopologicalSpace)
instance : CoeSort TopCat Type* where
coe X := X.α
instance topologicalSpaceUnbundled (X : TopCat) : TopologicalSpace X :=
X.str
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.topological_space_unbundled TopCat.topologicalSpaceUnbundled
-- We leave this temporarily as a reminder of the downstream instances #13170
-- -- Porting note: cannot find a coercion to function otherwise
-- -- attribute [instance] ConcreteCategory.instFunLike in
-- instance (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : CoeFun (X ⟶ Y) fun _ => X → Y where
-- coe (f : C(X, Y)) := f
instance instFunLike (X Y : TopCat) : FunLike (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
inferInstanceAs <| FunLike C(X, Y) X Y
instance instMonoidHomClass (X Y : TopCat) : ContinuousMapClass (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
inferInstanceAs <| ContinuousMapClass C(X, Y) X Y
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem id_app (X : TopCat.{u}) (x : ↑X) : (𝟙 X : X ⟶ X) x = x := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.id_app TopCat.id_app
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem comp_app {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x : X) :
(f ≫ g : X → Z) x = g (f x) := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.comp_app TopCat.comp_app
@[simp] theorem coe_id (X : TopCat.{u}) : (𝟙 X : X → X) = id := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_comp {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g : X → Z) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma hom_inv_id_apply {X Y : TopCat} (f : X ≅ Y) (x : X) : f.inv (f.hom x) = x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun f.hom_inv_id x
@[simp]
lemma inv_hom_id_apply {X Y : TopCat} (f : X ≅ Y) (y : Y) : f.hom (f.inv y) = y :=
DFunLike.congr_fun f.inv_hom_id y
/-- Construct a bundled `Top` from the underlying type and the typeclass. -/
def of (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : TopCat :=
-- Porting note: needed to call inferInstance
⟨X, inferInstance⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.of TopCat.of
instance topologicalSpace_coe (X : TopCat) : TopologicalSpace X :=
X.str
-- Porting note: cannot see through forget; made reducible to get closer to Lean 3 behavior
@[instance] abbrev topologicalSpace_forget
(X : TopCat) : TopologicalSpace <| (forget TopCat).obj X :=
X.str
@[simp]
theorem coe_of (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : (of X : Type u) = X := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.coe_of TopCat.coe_of
/--
Replace a function coercion for a morphism `TopCat.of X ⟶ TopCat.of Y` with the definitionally
equal function coercion for a continuous map `C(X, Y)`.
-/
@[simp] theorem coe_of_of {X Y : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
{f : C(X, Y)} {x} :
@DFunLike.coe (TopCat.of X ⟶ TopCat.of Y) ((CategoryTheory.forget TopCat).obj (TopCat.of X))
(fun _ ↦ (CategoryTheory.forget TopCat).obj (TopCat.of Y)) ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
f x =
@DFunLike.coe C(X, Y) X
(fun _ ↦ Y) _
f x :=
rfl
instance inhabited : Inhabited TopCat :=
⟨TopCat.of Empty⟩
-- Porting note: added to ease the port of `AlgebraicTopology.TopologicalSimplex`
lemma hom_apply {X Y : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) (x : X) : f x = ContinuousMap.toFun f x := rfl
/-- The discrete topology on any type. -/
def discrete : Type u ⥤ TopCat.{u} where
obj X := ⟨X , ⊥⟩
map f := @ContinuousMap.mk _ _ ⊥ ⊥ f continuous_bot
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.discrete TopCat.discrete
instance {X : Type u} : DiscreteTopology (discrete.obj X) :=
⟨rfl⟩
/-- The trivial topology on any type. -/
def trivial : Type u ⥤ TopCat.{u} where
obj X := ⟨X, ⊤⟩
map f := @ContinuousMap.mk _ _ ⊤ ⊤ f continuous_top
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.trivial TopCat.trivial
/-- Any homeomorphisms induces an isomorphism in `Top`. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfHomeo {X Y : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ≃ₜ Y) : X ≅ Y where
-- Porting note: previously ⟨f⟩ for hom (inv) and tidy closed proofs
hom := f.toContinuousMap
inv := f.symm.toContinuousMap
hom_inv_id := by ext; exact f.symm_apply_apply _
inv_hom_id := by ext; exact f.apply_symm_apply _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.iso_of_homeo TopCat.isoOfHomeo
/-- Any isomorphism in `Top` induces a homeomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def homeoOfIso {X Y : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ≅ Y) : X ≃ₜ Y where
toFun := f.hom
invFun := f.inv
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp
continuous_toFun := f.hom.continuous
continuous_invFun := f.inv.continuous
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.homeo_of_iso TopCat.homeoOfIso
@[simp]
theorem of_isoOfHomeo {X Y : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ≃ₜ Y) : homeoOfIso (isoOfHomeo f) = f := by
-- Porting note: unfold some defs now
dsimp [homeoOfIso, isoOfHomeo]
ext
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.of_iso_of_homeo TopCat.of_isoOfHomeo
@[simp]
theorem of_homeoOfIso {X Y : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ≅ Y) : isoOfHomeo (homeoOfIso f) = f := by
-- Porting note: unfold some defs now
dsimp [homeoOfIso, isoOfHomeo]
ext
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.of_homeo_of_iso TopCat.of_homeoOfIso
-- Porting note: simpNF requested partially simped version below
theorem openEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
OpenEmbedding (f ≫ g) ↔ OpenEmbedding f :=
(TopCat.homeoOfIso (asIso g)).openEmbedding.of_comp_iff f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.open_embedding_iff_comp_is_iso TopCat.openEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso
@[simp]
theorem openEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso' {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
OpenEmbedding ((forget TopCat).map f ≫ (forget TopCat).map g) ↔ OpenEmbedding f := by
simp only [← Functor.map_comp]
exact openEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso f g
-- Porting note: simpNF requested partially simped version below
theorem openEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
OpenEmbedding (f ≫ g) ↔ OpenEmbedding g := by
constructor
· intro h
convert h.comp (TopCat.homeoOfIso (asIso f).symm).openEmbedding
exact congrArg _ (IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc f g).symm
· exact fun h => h.comp (TopCat.homeoOfIso (asIso f)).openEmbedding
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.open_embedding_iff_is_iso_comp TopCat.openEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Basic.lean | 217 | 220 | theorem openEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp' {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
OpenEmbedding ((forget TopCat).map f ≫ (forget TopCat).map g) ↔ OpenEmbedding g := by |
simp only [← Functor.map_comp]
exact openEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp f g
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Exact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
#align_import category_theory.preadditive.projective from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3974a774a707e2e06046a14c0eaef4654584fada"
/-!
# Projective objects and categories with enough projectives
An object `P` is called *projective* if every morphism out of `P` factors through every epimorphism.
A category `C` *has enough projectives* if every object admits an epimorphism from some
projective object.
`CategoryTheory.Projective.over X` picks an arbitrary such projective object, and
`CategoryTheory.Projective.π X : CategoryTheory.Projective.over X ⟶ X` is the corresponding
epimorphism.
Given a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`, `CategoryTheory.Projective.left f` is a projective object over
`CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel f`, and `Projective.d f : Projective.left f ⟶ X` is the morphism
`π (kernel f) ≫ kernel.ι f`.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Opposite
universe v u v' u'
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/--
An object `P` is called *projective* if every morphism out of `P` factors through every epimorphism.
-/
class Projective (P : C) : Prop where
factors : ∀ {E X : C} (f : P ⟶ X) (e : E ⟶ X) [Epi e], ∃ f', f' ≫ e = f
#align category_theory.projective CategoryTheory.Projective
lemma Limits.IsZero.projective {X : C} (h : IsZero X) : Projective X where
factors _ _ _ := ⟨h.to_ _, h.eq_of_src _ _⟩
section
/-- A projective presentation of an object `X` consists of an epimorphism `f : P ⟶ X`
from some projective object `P`.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): was @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure ProjectivePresentation (X : C) where
p : C
[projective : Projective p]
f : p ⟶ X
[epi : Epi f]
#align category_theory.projective_presentation CategoryTheory.ProjectivePresentation
attribute [instance] ProjectivePresentation.projective ProjectivePresentation.epi
variable (C)
/-- A category "has enough projectives" if for every object `X` there is a projective object `P` and
an epimorphism `P ↠ X`. -/
class EnoughProjectives : Prop where
presentation : ∀ X : C, Nonempty (ProjectivePresentation X)
#align category_theory.enough_projectives CategoryTheory.EnoughProjectives
end
namespace Projective
/--
An arbitrarily chosen factorisation of a morphism out of a projective object through an epimorphism.
-/
def factorThru {P X E : C} [Projective P] (f : P ⟶ X) (e : E ⟶ X) [Epi e] : P ⟶ E :=
(Projective.factors f e).choose
#align category_theory.projective.factor_thru CategoryTheory.Projective.factorThru
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem factorThru_comp {P X E : C} [Projective P] (f : P ⟶ X) (e : E ⟶ X) [Epi e] :
factorThru f e ≫ e = f :=
(Projective.factors f e).choose_spec
#align category_theory.projective.factor_thru_comp CategoryTheory.Projective.factorThru_comp
section
open ZeroObject
instance zero_projective [HasZeroObject C] : Projective (0 : C) :=
(isZero_zero C).projective
#align category_theory.projective.zero_projective CategoryTheory.Projective.zero_projective
end
theorem of_iso {P Q : C} (i : P ≅ Q) (hP : Projective P) : Projective Q where
factors f e e_epi :=
let ⟨f', hf'⟩ := Projective.factors (i.hom ≫ f) e
⟨i.inv ≫ f', by simp [hf']⟩
#align category_theory.projective.of_iso CategoryTheory.Projective.of_iso
theorem iso_iff {P Q : C} (i : P ≅ Q) : Projective P ↔ Projective Q :=
⟨of_iso i, of_iso i.symm⟩
#align category_theory.projective.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Projective.iso_iff
/-- The axiom of choice says that every type is a projective object in `Type`. -/
instance (X : Type u) : Projective X where
factors f e _ :=
have he : Function.Surjective e := surjective_of_epi e
⟨fun x => (he (f x)).choose, funext fun x ↦ (he (f x)).choose_spec⟩
instance Type.enoughProjectives : EnoughProjectives (Type u) where
presentation X := ⟨⟨X, 𝟙 X⟩⟩
#align category_theory.projective.Type.enough_projectives CategoryTheory.Projective.Type.enoughProjectives
instance {P Q : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct P Q] [Projective P] [Projective Q] : Projective (P ⨿ Q) where
factors f e epi := ⟨coprod.desc (factorThru (coprod.inl ≫ f) e) (factorThru (coprod.inr ≫ f) e),
by aesop_cat⟩
instance {β : Type v} (g : β → C) [HasCoproduct g] [∀ b, Projective (g b)] : Projective (∐ g) where
factors f e epi := ⟨Sigma.desc fun b => factorThru (Sigma.ι g b ≫ f) e, by aesop_cat⟩
instance {P Q : C} [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasBinaryBiproduct P Q] [Projective P] [Projective Q] :
Projective (P ⊞ Q) where
factors f e epi := ⟨biprod.desc (factorThru (biprod.inl ≫ f) e) (factorThru (biprod.inr ≫ f) e),
by aesop_cat⟩
instance {β : Type v} (g : β → C) [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasBiproduct g] [∀ b, Projective (g b)] :
Projective (⨁ g) where
factors f e epi := ⟨biproduct.desc fun b => factorThru (biproduct.ι g b ≫ f) e, by aesop_cat⟩
theorem projective_iff_preservesEpimorphisms_coyoneda_obj (P : C) :
Projective P ↔ (coyoneda.obj (op P)).PreservesEpimorphisms :=
⟨fun hP =>
⟨fun f _ =>
(epi_iff_surjective _).2 fun g =>
have : Projective (unop (op P)) := hP
⟨factorThru g f, factorThru_comp _ _⟩⟩,
fun _ =>
⟨fun f e _ =>
(epi_iff_surjective _).1 (inferInstance : Epi ((coyoneda.obj (op P)).map e)) f⟩⟩
#align category_theory.projective.projective_iff_preserves_epimorphisms_coyoneda_obj CategoryTheory.Projective.projective_iff_preservesEpimorphisms_coyoneda_obj
section EnoughProjectives
variable [EnoughProjectives C]
/-- `Projective.over X` provides an arbitrarily chosen projective object equipped with
an epimorphism `Projective.π : Projective.over X ⟶ X`.
-/
def over (X : C) : C :=
(EnoughProjectives.presentation X).some.p
#align category_theory.projective.over CategoryTheory.Projective.over
instance projective_over (X : C) : Projective (over X) :=
(EnoughProjectives.presentation X).some.projective
#align category_theory.projective.projective_over CategoryTheory.Projective.projective_over
/-- The epimorphism `projective.π : projective.over X ⟶ X`
from the arbitrarily chosen projective object over `X`.
-/
def π (X : C) : over X ⟶ X :=
(EnoughProjectives.presentation X).some.f
#align category_theory.projective.π CategoryTheory.Projective.π
instance π_epi (X : C) : Epi (π X) :=
(EnoughProjectives.presentation X).some.epi
#align category_theory.projective.π_epi CategoryTheory.Projective.π_epi
section
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f]
/-- When `C` has enough projectives, the object `Projective.syzygies f` is
an arbitrarily chosen projective object over `kernel f`.
-/
def syzygies : C := over (kernel f)
#align category_theory.projective.syzygies CategoryTheory.Projective.syzygies
instance : Projective (syzygies f) := inferInstanceAs (Projective (over _))
/-- When `C` has enough projectives,
`Projective.d f : Projective.syzygies f ⟶ X` is the composition
`π (kernel f) ≫ kernel.ι f`.
(When `C` is abelian, we have `exact (projective.d f) f`.)
-/
abbrev d : syzygies f ⟶ X :=
π (kernel f) ≫ kernel.ι f
#align category_theory.projective.d CategoryTheory.Projective.d
end
end EnoughProjectives
end Projective
namespace Adjunction
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C}
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Projective.lean | 208 | 214 | theorem map_projective (adj : F ⊣ G) [G.PreservesEpimorphisms] (P : C) (hP : Projective P) :
Projective (F.obj P) where
factors f g _ := by |
rcases hP.factors (adj.unit.app P ≫ G.map f) (G.map g) with ⟨f', hf'⟩
use F.map f' ≫ adj.counit.app _
rw [Category.assoc, ← Adjunction.counit_naturality, ← Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp, hf']
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.connectivity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b99e2d58a5e6861833fa8de11e51a81144258db4"
/-!
# Graph connectivity
In a simple graph,
* A *walk* is a finite sequence of adjacent vertices, and can be
thought of equally well as a sequence of directed edges.
* A *trail* is a walk whose edges each appear no more than once.
* A *path* is a trail whose vertices appear no more than once.
* A *cycle* is a nonempty trail whose first and last vertices are the
same and whose vertices except for the first appear no more than once.
**Warning:** graph theorists mean something different by "path" than
do homotopy theorists. A "walk" in graph theory is a "path" in
homotopy theory. Another warning: some graph theorists use "path" and
"simple path" for "walk" and "path."
Some definitions and theorems have inspiration from multigraph
counterparts in [Chou1994].
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Walk` (with accompanying pattern definitions
`SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'` and `SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'`)
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail`, `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath`, and `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle`.
* `SimpleGraph.Path`
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.map` and `SimpleGraph.Path.map` for the induced map on walks,
given an (injective) graph homomorphism.
* `SimpleGraph.Reachable` for the relation of whether there exists
a walk between a given pair of vertices
* `SimpleGraph.Preconnected` and `SimpleGraph.Connected` are predicates
on simple graphs for whether every vertex can be reached from every other,
and in the latter case, whether the vertex type is nonempty.
* `SimpleGraph.ConnectedComponent` is the type of connected components of
a given graph.
* `SimpleGraph.IsBridge` for whether an edge is a bridge edge
## Main statements
* `SimpleGraph.isBridge_iff_mem_and_forall_cycle_not_mem` characterizes bridge edges in terms of
there being no cycle containing them.
## Tags
walks, trails, paths, circuits, cycles, bridge edges
-/
open Function
universe u v w
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {V'' : Type w}
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph V') (G'' : SimpleGraph V'')
/-- A walk is a sequence of adjacent vertices. For vertices `u v : V`,
the type `walk u v` consists of all walks starting at `u` and ending at `v`.
We say that a walk *visits* the vertices it contains. The set of vertices a
walk visits is `SimpleGraph.Walk.support`.
See `SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'` and `SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'` for patterns that
can be useful in definitions since they make the vertices explicit. -/
inductive Walk : V → V → Type u
| nil {u : V} : Walk u u
| cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : Walk v w) : Walk u w
deriving DecidableEq
#align simple_graph.walk SimpleGraph.Walk
attribute [refl] Walk.nil
@[simps]
instance Walk.instInhabited (v : V) : Inhabited (G.Walk v v) := ⟨Walk.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.inhabited SimpleGraph.Walk.instInhabited
/-- The one-edge walk associated to a pair of adjacent vertices. -/
@[match_pattern, reducible]
def Adj.toWalk {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Walk u v :=
Walk.cons h Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.adj.to_walk SimpleGraph.Adj.toWalk
namespace Walk
variable {G}
/-- Pattern to get `Walk.nil` with the vertex as an explicit argument. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev nil' (u : V) : G.Walk u u := Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.walk.nil' SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'
/-- Pattern to get `Walk.cons` with the vertices as explicit arguments. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev cons' (u v w : V) (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) : G.Walk u w := Walk.cons h p
#align simple_graph.walk.cons' SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'
/-- Change the endpoints of a walk using equalities. This is helpful for relaxing
definitional equality constraints and to be able to state otherwise difficult-to-state
lemmas. While this is a simple wrapper around `Eq.rec`, it gives a canonical way to write it.
The simp-normal form is for the `copy` to be pushed outward. That way calculations can
occur within the "copy context." -/
protected def copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') : G.Walk u' v' :=
hu ▸ hv ▸ p
#align simple_graph.walk.copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_rfl_rfl {u v} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.copy rfl rfl = p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_rfl_rfl SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_rfl_rfl
@[simp]
theorem copy_copy {u v u' v' u'' v''} (p : G.Walk u v)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hu' : u' = u'') (hv' : v' = v'') :
(p.copy hu hv).copy hu' hv' = p.copy (hu.trans hu') (hv.trans hv') := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_nil {u u'} (hu : u = u') : (Walk.nil : G.Walk u u).copy hu hu = Walk.nil := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_nil
theorem copy_cons {u v w u' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (hu : u = u') (hw : w = w') :
(Walk.cons h p).copy hu hw = Walk.cons (hu ▸ h) (p.copy rfl hw) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_copy {u v w v' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v' w') (hv : v' = v) (hw : w' = w) :
Walk.cons h (p.copy hv hw) = (Walk.cons (hv ▸ h) p).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_copy
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_ne {u v : V} (hne : u ≠ v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v), ∃ (w : V) (h : G.Adj u w) (p' : G.Walk w v), p = cons h p'
| nil => (hne rfl).elim
| cons h p' => ⟨_, h, p', rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne
/-- The length of a walk is the number of edges/darts along it. -/
def length {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ
| nil => 0
| cons _ q => q.length.succ
#align simple_graph.walk.length SimpleGraph.Walk.length
/-- The concatenation of two compatible walks. -/
@[trans]
def append {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk v w → G.Walk u w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => cons h (p.append q)
#align simple_graph.walk.append SimpleGraph.Walk.append
/-- The reversed version of `SimpleGraph.Walk.cons`, concatenating an edge to
the end of a walk. -/
def concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) : G.Walk u w := p.append (cons h nil)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concat
theorem concat_eq_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
p.concat h = p.append (cons h nil) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_eq_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_eq_append
/-- The concatenation of the reverse of the first walk with the second walk. -/
protected def reverseAux {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u w → G.Walk v w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => Walk.reverseAux p (cons (G.symm h) q)
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux
/-- The walk in reverse. -/
@[symm]
def reverse {u v : V} (w : G.Walk u v) : G.Walk v u := w.reverseAux nil
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse
/-- Get the `n`th vertex from a walk, where `n` is generally expected to be
between `0` and `p.length`, inclusive.
If `n` is greater than or equal to `p.length`, the result is the path's endpoint. -/
def getVert {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ → V
| nil, _ => u
| cons _ _, 0 => u
| cons _ q, n + 1 => q.getVert n
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert
@[simp]
theorem getVert_zero {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert 0 = u := by cases w <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_zero
theorem getVert_of_length_le {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : w.length ≤ i) :
w.getVert i = v := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
cases i
· cases hi
· exact ih (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_of_length_le SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_of_length_le
@[simp]
theorem getVert_length {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert w.length = v :=
w.getVert_of_length_le rfl.le
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_length SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_length
theorem adj_getVert_succ {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < w.length) :
G.Adj (w.getVert i) (w.getVert (i + 1)) := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons hxy _ ih =>
cases i
· simp [getVert, hxy]
· exact ih (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_get_vert_succ SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_getVert_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_append {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(cons h p).append q = cons h (p.append q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_nil_append {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h nil).append p = cons h p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_nil_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.append nil = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => rw [cons_append, ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem nil_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : nil.append p = p :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.nil_append
theorem append_assoc {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
p.append (q.append r) = (p.append q).append r := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p' ih =>
dsimp only [append]
rw [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_assoc SimpleGraph.Walk.append_assoc
@[simp]
theorem append_copy_copy {u v w u' v' w'} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w') :
(p.copy hu hv).append (q.copy hv hw) = (p.append q).copy hu hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.append_copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.append_copy_copy
theorem concat_nil {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : nil.concat h = cons h nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_nil
@[simp]
theorem concat_cons {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (h' : G.Adj w x) :
(cons h p).concat h' = cons h (p.concat h') := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_cons
theorem append_concat {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (h : G.Adj w x) :
p.append (q.concat h) = (p.append q).concat h := append_assoc _ _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.append_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.append_concat
theorem concat_append {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(p.concat h).append q = p.append (cons h q) := by
rw [concat_eq_append, ← append_assoc, cons_nil_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_append
/-- A non-trivial `cons` walk is representable as a `concat` walk. -/
theorem exists_cons_eq_concat {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
∃ (x : V) (q : G.Walk u x) (h' : G.Adj x w), cons h p = q.concat h' := by
induction p generalizing u with
| nil => exact ⟨_, nil, h, rfl⟩
| cons h' p ih =>
obtain ⟨y, q, h'', hc⟩ := ih h'
refine ⟨y, cons h q, h'', ?_⟩
rw [concat_cons, hc]
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_cons_eq_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_cons_eq_concat
/-- A non-trivial `concat` walk is representable as a `cons` walk. -/
theorem exists_concat_eq_cons {u v w : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w),
∃ (x : V) (h' : G.Adj u x) (q : G.Walk x w), p.concat h = cons h' q
| nil, h => ⟨_, h, nil, rfl⟩
| cons h' p, h => ⟨_, h', Walk.concat p h, concat_cons _ _ _⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_concat_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_concat_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).reverse = nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_nil
theorem reverse_singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : (cons h nil).reverse = cons (G.symm h) nil :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_singleton SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_reverseAux {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk w x) (h : G.Adj w u) :
(cons h p).reverseAux q = p.reverseAux (cons (G.symm h) q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem append_reverseAux {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk u x) :
(p.append q).reverseAux r = q.reverseAux (p.reverseAux r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => exact ih q (cons (G.symm h) r)
#align simple_graph.walk.append_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.append_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem reverseAux_append {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
(p.reverseAux q).append r = p.reverseAux (q.append r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => simp [ih (cons (G.symm h) q)]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_append
protected theorem reverseAux_eq_reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
p.reverseAux q = p.reverse.append q := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_eq_reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_eq_reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).reverse = p.reverse.append (cons (G.symm h) nil) := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).reverse = p.reverse.copy hv hu := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_copy
@[simp]
theorem reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).reverse = q.reverse.append p.reverse := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).reverse = cons (G.symm h) p.reverse := by simp [concat_eq_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_concat
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).length = 0 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.length_nil
@[simp]
theorem length_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).length = p.length + 1 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons
@[simp]
theorem length_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).length = p.length := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.length_copy
@[simp]
theorem length_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_append SimpleGraph.Walk.length_append
@[simp]
theorem length_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).length = p.length + 1 := length_append _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.length_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.length_concat
@[simp]
protected theorem length_reverseAux {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
(p.reverseAux q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverseAux
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.length = p.length := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverse
theorem eq_of_length_eq_zero {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 0 → u = v
| nil, _ => rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero
theorem adj_of_length_eq_one {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 1 → G.Adj u v
| cons h nil, _ => h
@[simp]
theorem exists_length_eq_zero_iff {u v : V} : (∃ p : G.Walk u v, p.length = 0) ↔ u = v := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
exact eq_of_length_eq_zero hp
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨nil, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem length_eq_zero_iff {u : V} {p : G.Walk u u} : p.length = 0 ↔ p = nil := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.length_eq_zero_iff
theorem getVert_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (i : ℕ) :
(p.append q).getVert i = if i < p.length then p.getVert i else q.getVert (i - p.length) := by
induction p generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons h p ih => cases i <;> simp [getVert, ih, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
theorem getVert_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (i : ℕ) :
p.reverse.getVert i = p.getVert (p.length - i) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p ih =>
simp only [reverse_cons, getVert_append, length_reverse, ih, length_cons]
split_ifs
next hi =>
rw [Nat.succ_sub hi.le]
simp [getVert]
next hi =>
obtain rfl | hi' := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_not_lt hi
· simp [getVert]
· rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hi') rfl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le hi']
simp [getVert]
section ConcatRec
variable {motive : ∀ u v : V, G.Walk u v → Sort*} (Hnil : ∀ {u : V}, motive u u nil)
(Hconcat : ∀ {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w), motive u v p → motive u w (p.concat h))
/-- Auxiliary definition for `SimpleGraph.Walk.concatRec` -/
def concatRecAux {u v : V} : (p : G.Walk u v) → motive v u p.reverse
| nil => Hnil
| cons h p => reverse_cons h p ▸ Hconcat p.reverse h.symm (concatRecAux p)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_rec_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.concatRecAux
/-- Recursor on walks by inducting on `SimpleGraph.Walk.concat`.
This is inducting from the opposite end of the walk compared
to `SimpleGraph.Walk.rec`, which inducts on `SimpleGraph.Walk.cons`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def concatRec {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : motive u v p :=
reverse_reverse p ▸ concatRecAux @Hnil @Hconcat p.reverse
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_rec SimpleGraph.Walk.concatRec
@[simp]
theorem concatRec_nil (u : V) :
@concatRec _ _ motive @Hnil @Hconcat _ _ (nil : G.Walk u u) = Hnil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_rec_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concatRec_nil
@[simp]
theorem concatRec_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
@concatRec _ _ motive @Hnil @Hconcat _ _ (p.concat h) =
Hconcat p h (concatRec @Hnil @Hconcat p) := by
simp only [concatRec]
apply eq_of_heq
apply rec_heq_of_heq
trans concatRecAux @Hnil @Hconcat (cons h.symm p.reverse)
· congr
simp
· rw [concatRecAux, rec_heq_iff_heq]
congr <;> simp [heq_rec_iff_heq]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_rec_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concatRec_concat
end ConcatRec
theorem concat_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v u) : p.concat h ≠ nil := by
cases p <;> simp [concat]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_ne_nil
theorem concat_inj {u v v' w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {h : G.Adj v w} {p' : G.Walk u v'}
{h' : G.Adj v' w} (he : p.concat h = p'.concat h') : ∃ hv : v = v', p.copy rfl hv = p' := by
induction p with
| nil =>
cases p'
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
simp only [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he.symm
| cons _ _ ih =>
rw [concat_cons] at he
cases p'
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he
· rw [concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := ih he
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_inj SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_inj
/-- The `support` of a walk is the list of vertices it visits in order. -/
def support {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List V
| nil => [u]
| cons _ p => u :: p.support
#align simple_graph.walk.support SimpleGraph.Walk.support
/-- The `darts` of a walk is the list of darts it visits in order. -/
def darts {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List G.Dart
| nil => []
| cons h p => ⟨(u, _), h⟩ :: p.darts
#align simple_graph.walk.darts SimpleGraph.Walk.darts
/-- The `edges` of a walk is the list of edges it visits in order.
This is defined to be the list of edges underlying `SimpleGraph.Walk.darts`. -/
def edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : List (Sym2 V) := p.darts.map Dart.edge
#align simple_graph.walk.edges SimpleGraph.Walk.edges
@[simp]
theorem support_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).support = [u] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nil
@[simp]
theorem support_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).support = u :: p.support := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_cons
@[simp]
theorem support_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).support = p.support.concat w := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.support_concat
@[simp]
theorem support_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).support = p.support := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.support_copy
theorem support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support = p.support ++ p'.support.tail := by
induction p <;> cases p' <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.support_append
@[simp]
theorem support_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.support = p.support.reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [support_append, *]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.support_reverse
@[simp]
theorem support_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support ≠ [] := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_ne_nil
theorem tail_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support.tail = p.support.tail ++ p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, List.tail_append_of_ne_nil _ _ (support_ne_nil _)]
#align simple_graph.walk.tail_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.tail_support_append
theorem support_eq_cons {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support = u :: p.support.tail := by
cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem start_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : u ∈ p.support := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.start_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.start_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support := by induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : { w | w ∈ p.support }.Nonempty :=
⟨u, by simp⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nonempty SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nonempty
theorem mem_support_iff {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
w ∈ p.support ↔ w = u ∨ w ∈ p.support.tail := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_iff
theorem mem_support_nil_iff {u v : V} : u ∈ (nil : G.Walk v v).support ↔ u = v := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_nil_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_nil_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_tail_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support.tail ↔ t ∈ p.support.tail ∨ t ∈ p'.support.tail := by
rw [tail_support_append, List.mem_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_tail_support_of_ne {u v : V} (h : u ≠ v) (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support.tail := by
obtain ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_cons_of_ne h p
simp
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem mem_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support ↔ t ∈ p.support ∨ t ∈ p'.support := by
simp only [mem_support_iff, mem_tail_support_append_iff]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne t v <;> obtain rfl | h' := eq_or_ne t u <;>
-- this `have` triggers the unusedHavesSuffices linter:
(try have := h'.symm) <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_support_append_left {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : p.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by
simp only [Walk.support_append, List.subset_append_left]
#align simple_graph.walk.subset_support_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.subset_support_append_left
@[simp]
theorem subset_support_append_right {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : q.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by
intro h
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_support_append_iff, or_true_iff, imp_true_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.subset_support_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.subset_support_append_right
theorem coe_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
(p.support : Multiset V) = {u} + p.support.tail := by cases p <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support
theorem coe_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
((p.append p').support : Multiset V) = {u} + p.support.tail + p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, ← Multiset.coe_add, coe_support]
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support_append
theorem coe_support_append' [DecidableEq V] {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
((p.append p').support : Multiset V) = p.support + p'.support - {v} := by
rw [support_append, ← Multiset.coe_add]
simp only [coe_support]
rw [add_comm ({v} : Multiset V)]
simp only [← add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support_append' SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support_append'
theorem chain_adj_support {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk v w), List.Chain G.Adj u p.support
| nil => List.Chain.cons h List.Chain.nil
| cons h' p => List.Chain.cons h (chain_adj_support h' p)
#align simple_graph.walk.chain_adj_support SimpleGraph.Walk.chain_adj_support
theorem chain'_adj_support {u v : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk u v), List.Chain' G.Adj p.support
| nil => List.Chain.nil
| cons h p => chain_adj_support h p
#align simple_graph.walk.chain'_adj_support SimpleGraph.Walk.chain'_adj_support
theorem chain_dartAdj_darts {d : G.Dart} {v w : V} (h : d.snd = v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
List.Chain G.DartAdj d p.darts := by
induction p generalizing d with
| nil => exact List.Chain.nil
-- Porting note: needed to defer `h` and `rfl` to help elaboration
| cons h' p ih => exact List.Chain.cons (by exact h) (ih (by rfl))
#align simple_graph.walk.chain_dart_adj_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.chain_dartAdj_darts
theorem chain'_dartAdj_darts {u v : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk u v), List.Chain' G.DartAdj p.darts
| nil => trivial
-- Porting note: needed to defer `rfl` to help elaboration
| cons h p => chain_dartAdj_darts (by rfl) p
#align simple_graph.walk.chain'_dart_adj_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.chain'_dartAdj_darts
/-- Every edge in a walk's edge list is an edge of the graph.
It is written in this form (rather than using `⊆`) to avoid unsightly coercions. -/
theorem edges_subset_edgeSet {u v : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) ⦃e : Sym2 V⦄, e ∈ p.edges → e ∈ G.edgeSet
| cons h' p', e, h => by
cases h
· exact h'
next h' => exact edges_subset_edgeSet p' h'
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_subset_edge_set SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_subset_edgeSet
theorem adj_of_mem_edges {u v x y : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : s(x, y) ∈ p.edges) : G.Adj x y :=
edges_subset_edgeSet p h
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_of_mem_edges
@[simp]
theorem darts_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).darts = [] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_nil
@[simp]
theorem darts_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).darts = ⟨(u, v), h⟩ :: p.darts := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_cons
@[simp]
theorem darts_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).darts = p.darts.concat ⟨(v, w), h⟩ := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_concat
@[simp]
theorem darts_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).darts = p.darts := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_copy
@[simp]
theorem darts_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').darts = p.darts ++ p'.darts := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_append SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_append
@[simp]
theorem darts_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.reverse.darts = (p.darts.map Dart.symm).reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [*, Sym2.eq_swap]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_reverse
theorem mem_darts_reverse {u v : V} {d : G.Dart} {p : G.Walk u v} :
d ∈ p.reverse.darts ↔ d.symm ∈ p.darts := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_darts_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_darts_reverse
theorem cons_map_snd_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : (u :: p.darts.map (·.snd)) = p.support := by
induction p <;> simp! [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_map_snd_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_map_snd_darts
theorem map_snd_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.map (·.snd) = p.support.tail := by
simpa using congr_arg List.tail (cons_map_snd_darts p)
#align simple_graph.walk.map_snd_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.map_snd_darts
theorem map_fst_darts_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.darts.map (·.fst) ++ [v] = p.support := by
induction p <;> simp! [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.map_fst_darts_append SimpleGraph.Walk.map_fst_darts_append
theorem map_fst_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.map (·.fst) = p.support.dropLast := by
simpa! using congr_arg List.dropLast (map_fst_darts_append p)
#align simple_graph.walk.map_fst_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.map_fst_darts
@[simp]
theorem edges_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).edges = [] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_nil
@[simp]
theorem edges_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).edges = s(u, v) :: p.edges := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_cons
@[simp]
theorem edges_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).edges = p.edges.concat s(v, w) := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_concat
@[simp]
theorem edges_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).edges = p.edges := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_copy
@[simp]
theorem edges_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').edges = p.edges ++ p'.edges := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_append SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_append
@[simp]
theorem edges_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.edges = p.edges.reverse := by
simp [edges, List.map_reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support.length = p.length + 1 := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_support SimpleGraph.Walk.length_support
@[simp]
theorem length_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.length = p.length := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.length_darts
@[simp]
theorem length_edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.edges.length = p.length := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.length_edges
theorem dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts {u v : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) {d : G.Dart}, d ∈ p.darts → d.fst ∈ p.support
| cons h p', d, hd => by
simp only [support_cons, darts_cons, List.mem_cons] at hd ⊢
rcases hd with (rfl | hd)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd)
#align simple_graph.walk.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts
theorem dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) {d : G.Dart}
(h : d ∈ p.darts) : d.snd ∈ p.support := by
simpa using p.reverse.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts (by simp [h] : d.symm ∈ p.reverse.darts)
#align simple_graph.walk.dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts
theorem fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (he : s(t, u) ∈ p.edges) :
t ∈ p.support := by
obtain ⟨d, hd, he⟩ := List.mem_map.mp he
rw [dart_edge_eq_mk'_iff'] at he
rcases he with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd
· exact dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd
#align simple_graph.walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges
theorem snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (he : s(t, u) ∈ p.edges) :
u ∈ p.support := by
rw [Sym2.eq_swap] at he
exact p.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges he
#align simple_graph.walk.snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges
theorem darts_nodup_of_support_nodup {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) :
p.darts.Nodup := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [darts_cons, support_cons, List.nodup_cons] at h ⊢
exact ⟨fun h' => h.1 (dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts p' h'), ih h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_nodup_of_support_nodup SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_nodup_of_support_nodup
theorem edges_nodup_of_support_nodup {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) :
p.edges.Nodup := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [edges_cons, support_cons, List.nodup_cons] at h ⊢
exact ⟨fun h' => h.1 (fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges p' h'), ih h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_nodup_of_support_nodup SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_nodup_of_support_nodup
/-- Predicate for the empty walk.
Solves the dependent type problem where `p = G.Walk.nil` typechecks
only if `p` has defeq endpoints. -/
inductive Nil : {v w : V} → G.Walk v w → Prop
| nil {u : V} : Nil (nil : G.Walk u u)
variable {u v w : V}
@[simp] lemma nil_nil : (nil : G.Walk u u).Nil := Nil.nil
@[simp] lemma not_nil_cons {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} : ¬ (cons h p).Nil := nofun
instance (p : G.Walk v w) : Decidable p.Nil :=
match p with
| nil => isTrue .nil
| cons _ _ => isFalse nofun
protected lemma Nil.eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil → v = w | .nil => rfl
lemma not_nil_of_ne {p : G.Walk v w} : v ≠ w → ¬ p.Nil := mt Nil.eq
lemma nil_iff_support_eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil ↔ p.support = [v] := by
cases p <;> simp
lemma nil_iff_length_eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil ↔ p.length = 0 := by
cases p <;> simp
lemma not_nil_iff {p : G.Walk v w} :
¬ p.Nil ↔ ∃ (u : V) (h : G.Adj v u) (q : G.Walk u w), p = cons h q := by
cases p <;> simp [*]
/-- A walk with its endpoints defeq is `Nil` if and only if it is equal to `nil`. -/
lemma nil_iff_eq_nil : ∀ {p : G.Walk v v}, p.Nil ↔ p = nil
| .nil | .cons _ _ => by simp
alias ⟨Nil.eq_nil, _⟩ := nil_iff_eq_nil
@[elab_as_elim]
def notNilRec {motive : {u w : V} → (p : G.Walk u w) → (h : ¬ p.Nil) → Sort*}
(cons : {u v w : V} → (h : G.Adj u v) → (q : G.Walk v w) → motive (cons h q) not_nil_cons)
(p : G.Walk u w) : (hp : ¬ p.Nil) → motive p hp :=
match p with
| nil => fun hp => absurd .nil hp
| .cons h q => fun _ => cons h q
/-- The second vertex along a non-nil walk. -/
def sndOfNotNil (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : V :=
p.notNilRec (@fun _ u _ _ _ => u) hp
@[simp] lemma adj_sndOfNotNil {p : G.Walk v w} (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
G.Adj v (p.sndOfNotNil hp) :=
p.notNilRec (fun h _ => h) hp
/-- The walk obtained by removing the first dart of a non-nil walk. -/
def tail (p : G.Walk u v) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : G.Walk (p.sndOfNotNil hp) v :=
p.notNilRec (fun _ q => q) hp
/-- The first dart of a walk. -/
@[simps]
def firstDart (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : G.Dart where
fst := v
snd := p.sndOfNotNil hp
adj := p.adj_sndOfNotNil hp
lemma edge_firstDart (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
(p.firstDart hp).edge = s(v, p.sndOfNotNil hp) := rfl
variable {x y : V} -- TODO: rename to u, v, w instead?
@[simp] lemma cons_tail_eq (p : G.Walk x y) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
cons (p.adj_sndOfNotNil hp) (p.tail hp) = p :=
p.notNilRec (fun _ _ => rfl) hp
@[simp] lemma cons_support_tail (p : G.Walk x y) (hp : ¬p.Nil) :
x :: (p.tail hp).support = p.support := by
rw [← support_cons, cons_tail_eq]
@[simp] lemma length_tail_add_one {p : G.Walk x y} (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
(p.tail hp).length + 1 = p.length := by
rw [← length_cons, cons_tail_eq]
@[simp] lemma nil_copy {x' y' : V} {p : G.Walk x y} (hx : x = x') (hy : y = y') :
(p.copy hx hy).Nil = p.Nil := by
subst_vars; rfl
@[simp] lemma support_tail (p : G.Walk v v) (hp) :
(p.tail hp).support = p.support.tail := by
rw [← cons_support_tail p hp, List.tail_cons]
/-! ### Trails, paths, circuits, cycles -/
/-- A *trail* is a walk with no repeating edges. -/
@[mk_iff isTrail_def]
structure IsTrail {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Prop where
edges_nodup : p.edges.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isTrail_def
/-- A *path* is a walk with no repeating vertices.
Use `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.mk'` for a simpler constructor. -/
structure IsPath {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) extends IsTrail p : Prop where
support_nodup : p.support.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_trail : is_trail p` in structure
protected lemma IsPath.isTrail {p : Walk G u v}(h : IsPath p) : IsTrail p := h.toIsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.to_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.isTrail
/-- A *circuit* at `u : V` is a nonempty trail beginning and ending at `u`. -/
@[mk_iff isCircuit_def]
structure IsCircuit {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) extends IsTrail p : Prop where
ne_nil : p ≠ nil
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isCircuit_def
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_trail : is_trail p` in structure
protected lemma IsCircuit.isTrail {p : Walk G u u} (h : IsCircuit p) : IsTrail p := h.toIsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit.to_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit.isTrail
/-- A *cycle* at `u : V` is a circuit at `u` whose only repeating vertex
is `u` (which appears exactly twice). -/
structure IsCycle {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) extends IsCircuit p : Prop where
support_nodup : p.support.tail.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_circuit : is_circuit p` in structure
protected lemma IsCycle.isCircuit {p : Walk G u u} (h : IsCycle p) : IsCircuit p := h.toIsCircuit
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle.to_circuit SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle.isCircuit
@[simp]
theorem isTrail_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isTrail_copy
theorem IsPath.mk' {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) : p.IsPath :=
⟨⟨edges_nodup_of_support_nodup h⟩, h⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.mk' SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.mk'
theorem isPath_def {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.IsPath ↔ p.support.Nodup :=
⟨IsPath.support_nodup, IsPath.mk'⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_def
@[simp]
theorem isPath_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).IsPath ↔ p.IsPath := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_copy
@[simp]
theorem isCircuit_copy {u u'} (p : G.Walk u u) (hu : u = u') :
(p.copy hu hu).IsCircuit ↔ p.IsCircuit := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isCircuit_copy
lemma IsCircuit.not_nil {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : IsCircuit p) : ¬ p.Nil := (hp.ne_nil ·.eq_nil)
theorem isCycle_def {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) :
p.IsCycle ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ p ≠ nil ∧ p.support.tail.Nodup :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.1.1, h.1.2, h.2⟩) fun h => ⟨⟨h.1, h.2.1⟩, h.2.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isCycle_def
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_copy {u u'} (p : G.Walk u u) (hu : u = u') :
(p.copy hu hu).IsCycle ↔ p.IsCycle := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isCycle_copy
lemma IsCycle.not_nil {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : IsCycle p) : ¬ p.Nil := (hp.ne_nil ·.eq_nil)
@[simp]
theorem IsTrail.nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).IsTrail :=
⟨by simp [edges]⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.nil
theorem IsTrail.of_cons {u v w : V} {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} :
(cons h p).IsTrail → p.IsTrail := by simp [isTrail_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_isTrail_iff {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ s(u, v) ∉ p.edges := by simp [isTrail_def, and_comm]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_trail_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isTrail_iff
theorem IsTrail.reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : p.IsTrail) : p.reverse.IsTrail := by
simpa [isTrail_def] using h
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_isTrail_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail := by
constructor <;>
· intro h
convert h.reverse _
try rw [reverse_reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_is_trail_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_isTrail_iff
theorem IsTrail.of_append_left {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsTrail) : p.IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, edges_append, List.nodup_append] at h
exact ⟨h.1⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_append_left
theorem IsTrail.of_append_right {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsTrail) : q.IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, edges_append, List.nodup_append] at h
exact ⟨h.2.1⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_append_right
theorem IsTrail.count_edges_le_one [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail)
(e : Sym2 V) : p.edges.count e ≤ 1 :=
List.nodup_iff_count_le_one.mp h.edges_nodup e
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.count_edges_le_one SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.count_edges_le_one
theorem IsTrail.count_edges_eq_one [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail)
{e : Sym2 V} (he : e ∈ p.edges) : p.edges.count e = 1 :=
List.count_eq_one_of_mem h.edges_nodup he
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.count_edges_eq_one SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.count_edges_eq_one
theorem IsPath.nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).IsPath := by constructor <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.nil
theorem IsPath.of_cons {u v w : V} {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} :
(cons h p).IsPath → p.IsPath := by simp [isPath_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_isPath_iff {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).IsPath ↔ p.IsPath ∧ u ∉ p.support := by
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [isPath_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_path_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isPath_iff
protected lemma IsPath.cons {p : Walk G v w} (hp : p.IsPath) (hu : u ∉ p.support) {h : G.Adj u v} :
(cons h p).IsPath :=
(cons_isPath_iff _ _).2 ⟨hp, hu⟩
@[simp]
theorem isPath_iff_eq_nil {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) : p.IsPath ↔ p = nil := by
cases p <;> simp [IsPath.nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_iff_eq_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_iff_eq_nil
theorem IsPath.reverse {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsPath) : p.reverse.IsPath := by
simpa [isPath_def] using h
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.reverse
@[simp]
theorem isPath_reverse_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.IsPath ↔ p.IsPath := by
constructor <;> intro h <;> convert h.reverse; simp
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_reverse_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_reverse_iff
theorem IsPath.of_append_left {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w} :
(p.append q).IsPath → p.IsPath := by
simp only [isPath_def, support_append]
exact List.Nodup.of_append_left
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_append_left
theorem IsPath.of_append_right {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsPath) : q.IsPath := by
rw [← isPath_reverse_iff] at h ⊢
rw [reverse_append] at h
apply h.of_append_left
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_append_right
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.not_of_nil {u : V} : ¬(nil : G.Walk u u).IsCycle := fun h => h.ne_nil rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle.not_of_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle.not_of_nil
lemma IsCycle.ne_bot : ∀ {p : G.Walk u u}, p.IsCycle → G ≠ ⊥
| nil, hp => by cases hp.ne_nil rfl
| cons h _, hp => by rintro rfl; exact h
lemma IsCycle.three_le_length {v : V} {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : p.IsCycle) : 3 ≤ p.length := by
have ⟨⟨hp, hp'⟩, _⟩ := hp
match p with
| .nil => simp at hp'
| .cons h .nil => simp at h
| .cons _ (.cons _ .nil) => simp at hp
| .cons _ (.cons _ (.cons _ _)) => simp_rw [SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons]; omega
theorem cons_isCycle_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk v u) (h : G.Adj u v) :
(Walk.cons h p).IsCycle ↔ p.IsPath ∧ ¬s(u, v) ∈ p.edges := by
simp only [Walk.isCycle_def, Walk.isPath_def, Walk.isTrail_def, edges_cons, List.nodup_cons,
support_cons, List.tail_cons]
have : p.support.Nodup → p.edges.Nodup := edges_nodup_of_support_nodup
tauto
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_cycle_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isCycle_iff
lemma IsPath.tail {p : G.Walk u v} (hp : p.IsPath) (hp' : ¬ p.Nil) : (p.tail hp').IsPath := by
rw [Walk.isPath_def] at hp ⊢
rw [← cons_support_tail _ hp', List.nodup_cons] at hp
exact hp.2
/-! ### About paths -/
instance [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Decidable p.IsPath := by
rw [isPath_def]
infer_instance
theorem IsPath.length_lt [Fintype V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (hp : p.IsPath) :
p.length < Fintype.card V := by
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← length_support]
exact hp.support_nodup.length_le_card
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.length_lt SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.length_lt
/-! ### Walk decompositions -/
section WalkDecomp
variable [DecidableEq V]
/-- Given a vertex in the support of a path, give the path up until (and including) that vertex. -/
def takeUntil {v w : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk v w) (u : V), u ∈ p.support → G.Walk v u
| nil, u, h => by rw [mem_support_nil_iff.mp h]
| cons r p, u, h =>
if hx : v = u then
by subst u; exact Walk.nil
else
cons r (takeUntil p u <| by
cases h
· exact (hx rfl).elim
· assumption)
#align simple_graph.walk.take_until SimpleGraph.Walk.takeUntil
/-- Given a vertex in the support of a path, give the path from (and including) that vertex to
the end. In other words, drop vertices from the front of a path until (and not including)
that vertex. -/
def dropUntil {v w : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk v w) (u : V), u ∈ p.support → G.Walk u w
| nil, u, h => by rw [mem_support_nil_iff.mp h]
| cons r p, u, h =>
if hx : v = u then by
subst u
exact cons r p
else dropUntil p u <| by
cases h
· exact (hx rfl).elim
· assumption
#align simple_graph.walk.drop_until SimpleGraph.Walk.dropUntil
/-- The `takeUntil` and `dropUntil` functions split a walk into two pieces.
The lemma `SimpleGraph.Walk.count_support_takeUntil_eq_one` specifies where this split occurs. -/
@[simp]
theorem take_spec {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).append (p.dropUntil u h) = p := by
induction p
· rw [mem_support_nil_iff] at h
subst u
rfl
· cases h
· simp!
· simp! only
split_ifs with h' <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.take_spec SimpleGraph.Walk.take_spec
theorem mem_support_iff_exists_append {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
{p : G.Walk u v} : w ∈ p.support ↔ ∃ (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w v), p = q.append r := by
classical
constructor
· exact fun h => ⟨_, _, (p.take_spec h).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨q, r, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_support_append_iff, end_mem_support, start_mem_support, or_self_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_iff_exists_append SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_iff_exists_append
@[simp]
theorem count_support_takeUntil_eq_one {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).support.count u = 1 := by
induction p
· rw [mem_support_nil_iff] at h
subst u
simp!
· cases h
· simp!
· simp! only
split_ifs with h' <;> rw [eq_comm] at h' <;> subst_vars <;> simp! [*, List.count_cons]
#align simple_graph.walk.count_support_take_until_eq_one SimpleGraph.Walk.count_support_takeUntil_eq_one
theorem count_edges_takeUntil_le_one {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) (x : V) :
(p.takeUntil u h).edges.count s(u, x) ≤ 1 := by
induction' p with u' u' v' w' ha p' ih
· rw [mem_support_nil_iff] at h
subst u
simp!
· cases h
· simp!
· simp! only
split_ifs with h'
· subst h'
simp
· rw [edges_cons, List.count_cons]
split_ifs with h''
· rw [Sym2.eq_iff] at h''
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h''
· exact (h' rfl).elim
· cases p' <;> simp!
· apply ih
#align simple_graph.walk.count_edges_take_until_le_one SimpleGraph.Walk.count_edges_takeUntil_le_one
@[simp]
theorem takeUntil_copy {u v w v' w'} (p : G.Walk v w) (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w')
(h : u ∈ (p.copy hv hw).support) :
(p.copy hv hw).takeUntil u h = (p.takeUntil u (by subst_vars; exact h)).copy hv rfl := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.take_until_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.takeUntil_copy
@[simp]
theorem dropUntil_copy {u v w v' w'} (p : G.Walk v w) (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w')
(h : u ∈ (p.copy hv hw).support) :
(p.copy hv hw).dropUntil u h = (p.dropUntil u (by subst_vars; exact h)).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.drop_until_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.dropUntil_copy
theorem support_takeUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).support ⊆ p.support := fun x hx => by
rw [← take_spec p h, mem_support_append_iff]
exact Or.inl hx
#align simple_graph.walk.support_take_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.support_takeUntil_subset
theorem support_dropUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.dropUntil u h).support ⊆ p.support := fun x hx => by
rw [← take_spec p h, mem_support_append_iff]
exact Or.inr hx
#align simple_graph.walk.support_drop_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.support_dropUntil_subset
theorem darts_takeUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).darts ⊆ p.darts := fun x hx => by
rw [← take_spec p h, darts_append, List.mem_append]
exact Or.inl hx
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_take_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_takeUntil_subset
theorem darts_dropUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.dropUntil u h).darts ⊆ p.darts := fun x hx => by
rw [← take_spec p h, darts_append, List.mem_append]
exact Or.inr hx
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_drop_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_dropUntil_subset
theorem edges_takeUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).edges ⊆ p.edges :=
List.map_subset _ (p.darts_takeUntil_subset h)
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_take_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_takeUntil_subset
theorem edges_dropUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.dropUntil u h).edges ⊆ p.edges :=
List.map_subset _ (p.darts_dropUntil_subset h)
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_drop_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_dropUntil_subset
theorem length_takeUntil_le {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).length ≤ p.length := by
have := congr_arg Walk.length (p.take_spec h)
rw [length_append] at this
exact Nat.le.intro this
#align simple_graph.walk.length_take_until_le SimpleGraph.Walk.length_takeUntil_le
theorem length_dropUntil_le {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.dropUntil u h).length ≤ p.length := by
have := congr_arg Walk.length (p.take_spec h)
rw [length_append, add_comm] at this
exact Nat.le.intro this
#align simple_graph.walk.length_drop_until_le SimpleGraph.Walk.length_dropUntil_le
protected theorem IsTrail.takeUntil {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk v w} (hc : p.IsTrail)
(h : u ∈ p.support) : (p.takeUntil u h).IsTrail :=
IsTrail.of_append_left (by rwa [← take_spec _ h] at hc)
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.take_until SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.takeUntil
protected theorem IsTrail.dropUntil {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk v w} (hc : p.IsTrail)
(h : u ∈ p.support) : (p.dropUntil u h).IsTrail :=
IsTrail.of_append_right (by rwa [← take_spec _ h] at hc)
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.drop_until SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.dropUntil
protected theorem IsPath.takeUntil {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk v w} (hc : p.IsPath)
(h : u ∈ p.support) : (p.takeUntil u h).IsPath :=
IsPath.of_append_left (by rwa [← take_spec _ h] at hc)
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.take_until SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.takeUntil
-- Porting note: p was previously accidentally an explicit argument
protected theorem IsPath.dropUntil {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk v w} (hc : p.IsPath)
(h : u ∈ p.support) : (p.dropUntil u h).IsPath :=
IsPath.of_append_right (by rwa [← take_spec _ h] at hc)
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.drop_until SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.dropUntil
/-- Rotate a loop walk such that it is centered at the given vertex. -/
def rotate {u v : V} (c : G.Walk v v) (h : u ∈ c.support) : G.Walk u u :=
(c.dropUntil u h).append (c.takeUntil u h)
#align simple_graph.walk.rotate SimpleGraph.Walk.rotate
@[simp]
theorem support_rotate {u v : V} (c : G.Walk v v) (h : u ∈ c.support) :
(c.rotate h).support.tail ~r c.support.tail := by
simp only [rotate, tail_support_append]
apply List.IsRotated.trans List.isRotated_append
rw [← tail_support_append, take_spec]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_rotate SimpleGraph.Walk.support_rotate
theorem rotate_darts {u v : V} (c : G.Walk v v) (h : u ∈ c.support) :
(c.rotate h).darts ~r c.darts := by
simp only [rotate, darts_append]
apply List.IsRotated.trans List.isRotated_append
rw [← darts_append, take_spec]
#align simple_graph.walk.rotate_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.rotate_darts
theorem rotate_edges {u v : V} (c : G.Walk v v) (h : u ∈ c.support) :
(c.rotate h).edges ~r c.edges :=
(rotate_darts c h).map _
#align simple_graph.walk.rotate_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.rotate_edges
protected theorem IsTrail.rotate {u v : V} {c : G.Walk v v} (hc : c.IsTrail) (h : u ∈ c.support) :
(c.rotate h).IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, (c.rotate_edges h).perm.nodup_iff]
exact hc.edges_nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.rotate SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.rotate
protected theorem IsCircuit.rotate {u v : V} {c : G.Walk v v} (hc : c.IsCircuit)
(h : u ∈ c.support) : (c.rotate h).IsCircuit := by
refine ⟨hc.isTrail.rotate _, ?_⟩
cases c
· exact (hc.ne_nil rfl).elim
· intro hn
have hn' := congr_arg length hn
rw [rotate, length_append, add_comm, ← length_append, take_spec] at hn'
simp at hn'
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit.rotate SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit.rotate
protected theorem IsCycle.rotate {u v : V} {c : G.Walk v v} (hc : c.IsCycle) (h : u ∈ c.support) :
(c.rotate h).IsCycle := by
refine ⟨hc.isCircuit.rotate _, ?_⟩
rw [List.IsRotated.nodup_iff (support_rotate _ _)]
exact hc.support_nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle.rotate SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle.rotate
end WalkDecomp
/-- Given a set `S` and a walk `w` from `u` to `v` such that `u ∈ S` but `v ∉ S`,
there exists a dart in the walk whose start is in `S` but whose end is not. -/
theorem exists_boundary_dart {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (S : Set V) (uS : u ∈ S) (vS : v ∉ S) :
∃ d : G.Dart, d ∈ p.darts ∧ d.fst ∈ S ∧ d.snd ∉ S := by
induction' p with _ x y w a p' ih
· cases vS uS
· by_cases h : y ∈ S
· obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := ih h vS
exact ⟨d, List.Mem.tail _ hd, hcd⟩
· exact ⟨⟨(x, y), a⟩, List.Mem.head _, uS, h⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_boundary_dart SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_boundary_dart
end Walk
/-! ### Type of paths -/
/-- The type for paths between two vertices. -/
abbrev Path (u v : V) := { p : G.Walk u v // p.IsPath }
#align simple_graph.path SimpleGraph.Path
namespace Path
variable {G G'}
@[simp]
protected theorem isPath {u v : V} (p : G.Path u v) : (p : G.Walk u v).IsPath := p.property
#align simple_graph.path.is_path SimpleGraph.Path.isPath
@[simp]
protected theorem isTrail {u v : V} (p : G.Path u v) : (p : G.Walk u v).IsTrail :=
p.property.isTrail
#align simple_graph.path.is_trail SimpleGraph.Path.isTrail
/-- The length-0 path at a vertex. -/
@[refl, simps]
protected def nil {u : V} : G.Path u u :=
⟨Walk.nil, Walk.IsPath.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.path.nil SimpleGraph.Path.nil
/-- The length-1 path between a pair of adjacent vertices. -/
@[simps]
def singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Path u v :=
⟨Walk.cons h Walk.nil, by simp [h.ne]⟩
#align simple_graph.path.singleton SimpleGraph.Path.singleton
theorem mk'_mem_edges_singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) :
s(u, v) ∈ (singleton h : G.Walk u v).edges := by simp [singleton]
#align simple_graph.path.mk_mem_edges_singleton SimpleGraph.Path.mk'_mem_edges_singleton
/-- The reverse of a path is another path. See also `SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse`. -/
@[symm, simps]
def reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Path u v) : G.Path v u :=
⟨Walk.reverse p, p.property.reverse⟩
#align simple_graph.path.reverse SimpleGraph.Path.reverse
theorem count_support_eq_one [DecidableEq V] {u v w : V} {p : G.Path u v}
(hw : w ∈ (p : G.Walk u v).support) : (p : G.Walk u v).support.count w = 1 :=
List.count_eq_one_of_mem p.property.support_nodup hw
#align simple_graph.path.count_support_eq_one SimpleGraph.Path.count_support_eq_one
theorem count_edges_eq_one [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} {p : G.Path u v} (e : Sym2 V)
(hw : e ∈ (p : G.Walk u v).edges) : (p : G.Walk u v).edges.count e = 1 :=
List.count_eq_one_of_mem p.property.isTrail.edges_nodup hw
#align simple_graph.path.count_edges_eq_one SimpleGraph.Path.count_edges_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem nodup_support {u v : V} (p : G.Path u v) : (p : G.Walk u v).support.Nodup :=
(Walk.isPath_def _).mp p.property
#align simple_graph.path.nodup_support SimpleGraph.Path.nodup_support
theorem loop_eq {v : V} (p : G.Path v v) : p = Path.nil := by
obtain ⟨_ | _, h⟩ := p
· rfl
· simp at h
#align simple_graph.path.loop_eq SimpleGraph.Path.loop_eq
theorem not_mem_edges_of_loop {v : V} {e : Sym2 V} {p : G.Path v v} :
¬e ∈ (p : G.Walk v v).edges := by simp [p.loop_eq]
#align simple_graph.path.not_mem_edges_of_loop SimpleGraph.Path.not_mem_edges_of_loop
theorem cons_isCycle {u v : V} (p : G.Path v u) (h : G.Adj u v)
(he : ¬s(u, v) ∈ (p : G.Walk v u).edges) : (Walk.cons h ↑p).IsCycle := by
simp [Walk.isCycle_def, Walk.cons_isTrail_iff, he]
#align simple_graph.path.cons_is_cycle SimpleGraph.Path.cons_isCycle
end Path
/-! ### Walks to paths -/
namespace Walk
variable {G} [DecidableEq V]
/-- Given a walk, produces a walk from it by bypassing subwalks between repeated vertices.
The result is a path, as shown in `SimpleGraph.Walk.bypass_isPath`.
This is packaged up in `SimpleGraph.Walk.toPath`. -/
def bypass {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u v
| nil => nil
| cons ha p =>
let p' := p.bypass
if hs : u ∈ p'.support then
p'.dropUntil u hs
else
cons ha p'
#align simple_graph.walk.bypass SimpleGraph.Walk.bypass
@[simp]
theorem bypass_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).bypass = p.bypass.copy hu hv := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.bypass_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.bypass_copy
theorem bypass_isPath {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.bypass.IsPath := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [bypass]
split_ifs with hs
· exact ih.dropUntil hs
· simp [*, cons_isPath_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.bypass_is_path SimpleGraph.Walk.bypass_isPath
theorem length_bypass_le {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.bypass.length ≤ p.length := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
simp only [bypass]
split_ifs
· trans
· apply length_dropUntil_le
rw [length_cons]
omega
· rw [length_cons, length_cons]
exact Nat.add_le_add_right ih 1
#align simple_graph.walk.length_bypass_le SimpleGraph.Walk.length_bypass_le
lemma bypass_eq_self_of_length_le {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : p.length ≤ p.bypass.length) :
p.bypass = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p ih =>
simp only [Walk.bypass]
split_ifs with hb
· exfalso
simp only [hb, Walk.bypass, Walk.length_cons, dif_pos] at h
apply Nat.not_succ_le_self p.length
calc p.length + 1
_ ≤ (p.bypass.dropUntil _ _).length := h
_ ≤ p.bypass.length := Walk.length_dropUntil_le p.bypass hb
_ ≤ p.length := Walk.length_bypass_le _
· simp only [hb, Walk.bypass, Walk.length_cons, not_false_iff, dif_neg,
Nat.add_le_add_iff_right] at h
rw [ih h]
/-- Given a walk, produces a path with the same endpoints using `SimpleGraph.Walk.bypass`. -/
def toPath {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : G.Path u v :=
⟨p.bypass, p.bypass_isPath⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.to_path SimpleGraph.Walk.toPath
theorem support_bypass_subset {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.bypass.support ⊆ p.support := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ _ ih =>
simp! only
split_ifs
· apply List.Subset.trans (support_dropUntil_subset _ _)
apply List.subset_cons_of_subset
assumption
· rw [support_cons]
apply List.cons_subset_cons
assumption
#align simple_graph.walk.support_bypass_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.support_bypass_subset
theorem support_toPath_subset {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
(p.toPath : G.Walk u v).support ⊆ p.support :=
support_bypass_subset _
#align simple_graph.walk.support_to_path_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.support_toPath_subset
theorem darts_bypass_subset {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.bypass.darts ⊆ p.darts := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ _ ih =>
simp! only
split_ifs
· apply List.Subset.trans (darts_dropUntil_subset _ _)
apply List.subset_cons_of_subset _ ih
· rw [darts_cons]
exact List.cons_subset_cons _ ih
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_bypass_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_bypass_subset
theorem edges_bypass_subset {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.bypass.edges ⊆ p.edges :=
List.map_subset _ p.darts_bypass_subset
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_bypass_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_bypass_subset
theorem darts_toPath_subset {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : (p.toPath : G.Walk u v).darts ⊆ p.darts :=
darts_bypass_subset _
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_to_path_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_toPath_subset
theorem edges_toPath_subset {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : (p.toPath : G.Walk u v).edges ⊆ p.edges :=
edges_bypass_subset _
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_to_path_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_toPath_subset
end Walk
/-! ### Mapping paths -/
namespace Walk
variable {G G' G''}
/-- Given a graph homomorphism, map walks to walks. -/
protected def map (f : G →g G') {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → G'.Walk (f u) (f v)
| nil => nil
| cons h p => cons (f.map_adj h) (p.map f)
#align simple_graph.walk.map SimpleGraph.Walk.map
variable (f : G →g G') (f' : G' →g G'') {u v u' v' : V} (p : G.Walk u v)
@[simp]
theorem map_nil : (nil : G.Walk u u).map f = nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.map_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.map_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_cons {w : V} (h : G.Adj w u) : (cons h p).map f = cons (f.map_adj h) (p.map f) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.map_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_copy (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).map f = (p.map f).copy (hu ▸ rfl) (hv ▸ rfl) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.map_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.map_copy
@[simp]
theorem map_id (p : G.Walk u v) : p.map Hom.id = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ p' ih => simp [ih p']
#align simple_graph.walk.map_id SimpleGraph.Walk.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_map : (p.map f).map f' = p.map (f'.comp f) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.map_map SimpleGraph.Walk.map_map
/-- Unlike categories, for graphs vertex equality is an important notion, so needing to be able to
work with equality of graph homomorphisms is a necessary evil. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity.lean | 1,638 | 1,641 | theorem map_eq_of_eq {f : G →g G'} (f' : G →g G') (h : f = f') :
p.map f = (p.map f').copy (h ▸ rfl) (h ▸ rfl) := by |
subst_vars
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.List
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
#align_import computability.primrec from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2738d2ca56cbc63be80c3bd48e9ed90ad94e947d"
/-!
# The primitive recursive functions
The primitive recursive functions are the least collection of functions
`ℕ → ℕ` which are closed under projections (using the `pair`
pairing function), composition, zero, successor, and primitive recursion
(i.e. `Nat.rec` where the motive is `C n := ℕ`).
We can extend this definition to a large class of basic types by
using canonical encodings of types as natural numbers (Gödel numbering),
which we implement through the type class `Encodable`. (More precisely,
we need that the composition of encode with decode yields a
primitive recursive function, so we have the `Primcodable` type class
for this.)
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open Denumerable Encodable Function
namespace Nat
-- Porting note: elim is no longer required because lean 4 is better
-- at inferring motive types (I think this is the reason)
-- and worst case, we can always explicitly write (motive := fun _ => C)
-- without having to then add all the other underscores
-- /-- The non-dependent recursor on naturals. -/
-- def elim {C : Sort*} : C → (ℕ → C → C) → ℕ → C :=
-- @Nat.rec fun _ => C
-- example {C : Sort*} (base : C) (succ : ℕ → C → C) (a : ℕ) :
-- a.elim base succ = a.rec base succ := rfl
#align nat.elim Nat.rec
#align nat.elim_zero Nat.rec_zero
#align nat.elim_succ Nat.rec_add_one
-- Porting note: cases is no longer required because lean 4 is better
-- at inferring motive types (I think this is the reason)
-- /-- Cases on whether the input is 0 or a successor. -/
-- def cases {C : Sort*} (a : C) (f : ℕ → C) : ℕ → C :=
-- Nat.elim a fun n _ => f n
-- example {C : Sort*} (a : C) (f : ℕ → C) (n : ℕ) :
-- n.cases a f = n.casesOn a f := rfl
#align nat.cases Nat.casesOn
#align nat.cases_zero Nat.rec_zero
#align nat.cases_succ Nat.rec_add_one
/-- Calls the given function on a pair of entries `n`, encoded via the pairing function. -/
@[simp, reducible]
def unpaired {α} (f : ℕ → ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : α :=
f n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2
#align nat.unpaired Nat.unpaired
/-- The primitive recursive functions `ℕ → ℕ`. -/
protected inductive Primrec : (ℕ → ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Nat.Primrec fun _ => 0
| protected succ : Nat.Primrec succ
| left : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.1
| right : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => pair (f n) (g n)
| comp {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => f (g n)
| prec {f g} :
Nat.Primrec f →
Nat.Primrec g →
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.rec (f z) fun y IH => g <| pair z <| pair y IH)
#align nat.primrec Nat.Primrec
namespace Primrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Nat.Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
#align nat.primrec.of_eq Nat.Primrec.of_eq
theorem const : ∀ n : ℕ, Nat.Primrec fun _ => n
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => Primrec.succ.comp (const n)
#align nat.primrec.const Nat.Primrec.const
protected theorem id : Nat.Primrec id :=
(left.pair right).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align nat.primrec.id Nat.Primrec.id
theorem prec1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) :
Nat.Primrec fun n => n.rec m fun y IH => f <| Nat.pair y IH :=
((prec (const m) (hf.comp right)).comp (zero.pair Primrec.id)).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align nat.primrec.prec1 Nat.Primrec.prec1
theorem casesOn1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Nat.Primrec (Nat.casesOn · m f) :=
(prec1 m (hf.comp left)).of_eq <| by simp
#align nat.primrec.cases1 Nat.Primrec.casesOn1
-- Porting note: `Nat.Primrec.casesOn` is already declared as a recursor.
theorem casesOn' {f g} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (hg : Nat.Primrec g) :
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.casesOn (f z) fun y => g <| Nat.pair z y) :=
(prec hf (hg.comp (pair left (left.comp right)))).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align nat.primrec.cases Nat.Primrec.casesOn'
protected theorem swap : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap Nat.pair)) :=
(pair right left).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align nat.primrec.swap Nat.Primrec.swap
theorem swap' {f} (hf : Nat.Primrec (unpaired f)) : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap f)) :=
(hf.comp .swap).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align nat.primrec.swap' Nat.Primrec.swap'
theorem pred : Nat.Primrec pred :=
(casesOn1 0 Primrec.id).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp [*]
#align nat.primrec.pred Nat.Primrec.pred
theorem add : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· + ·)) :=
(prec .id ((Primrec.succ.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.add_assoc]
#align nat.primrec.add Nat.Primrec.add
theorem sub : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· - ·)) :=
(prec .id ((pred.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.sub_add_eq]
#align nat.primrec.sub Nat.Primrec.sub
theorem mul : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· * ·)) :=
(prec zero (add.comp (pair left (right.comp right)))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, mul_succ, add_comm _ (unpair p).fst]
#align nat.primrec.mul Nat.Primrec.mul
theorem pow : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· ^ ·)) :=
(prec (const 1) (mul.comp (pair (right.comp right) left))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.pow_succ]
#align nat.primrec.pow Nat.Primrec.pow
end Primrec
end Nat
/-- A `Primcodable` type is an `Encodable` type for which
the encode/decode functions are primitive recursive. -/
class Primcodable (α : Type*) extends Encodable α where
-- Porting note: was `prim [] `.
-- This means that `prim` does not take the type explicitly in Lean 4
prim : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (decode n)
#align primcodable Primcodable
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance (priority := 10) ofDenumerable (α) [Denumerable α] : Primcodable α :=
⟨Nat.Primrec.succ.of_eq <| by simp⟩
#align primcodable.of_denumerable Primcodable.ofDenumerable
/-- Builds a `Primcodable` instance from an equivalence to a `Primcodable` type. -/
def ofEquiv (α) {β} [Primcodable α] (e : β ≃ α) : Primcodable β :=
{ __ := Encodable.ofEquiv α e
prim := (@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by
rw [decode_ofEquiv]
cases (@decode α _ n) <;>
simp [encode_ofEquiv] }
#align primcodable.of_equiv Primcodable.ofEquiv
instance empty : Primcodable Empty :=
⟨zero⟩
#align primcodable.empty Primcodable.empty
instance unit : Primcodable PUnit :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 zero).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp⟩
#align primcodable.unit Primcodable.unit
instance option {α : Type*} [h : Primcodable α] : Primcodable (Option α) :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 ((casesOn1 0 (.comp .succ .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _))).of_eq fun n => by
cases n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n =>
rw [decode_option_succ]
cases H : @decode α _ n <;> simp [H]⟩
#align primcodable.option Primcodable.option
instance bool : Primcodable Bool :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 (casesOn1 2 zero)).of_eq fun n => match n with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| (n + 2) => by rw [decode_ge_two] <;> simp⟩
#align primcodable.bool Primcodable.bool
end Primcodable
/-- `Primrec f` means `f` is primitive recursive (after
encoding its input and output as natural numbers). -/
def Primrec {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
Nat.Primrec fun n => encode ((@decode α _ n).map f)
#align primrec Primrec
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
protected theorem encode : Primrec (@encode α _) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
#align primrec.encode Primrec.encode
protected theorem decode : Primrec (@decode α _) :=
Nat.Primrec.succ.comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)
#align primrec.decode Primrec.decode
theorem dom_denumerable {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec fun n => encode (f (ofNat α n)) :=
⟨fun h => (pred.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp, fun h =>
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp⟩
#align primrec.dom_denumerable Primrec.dom_denumerable
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} : Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec f :=
dom_denumerable
#align primrec.nat_iff Primrec.nat_iff
theorem encdec : Primrec fun n => encode (@decode α _ n) :=
nat_iff.2 Primcodable.prim
#align primrec.encdec Primrec.encdec
theorem option_some : Primrec (@some α) :=
((casesOn1 0 (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp
#align primrec.option_some Primrec.option_some
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
#align primrec.of_eq Primrec.of_eq
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec fun _ : α => x :=
((casesOn1 0 (.const (encode x).succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
#align primrec.const Primrec.const
protected theorem id : Primrec (@id α) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α).of_eq <| by simp
#align primrec.id Primrec.id
theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) :=
((casesOn1 0 (.comp hf (pred.comp hg))).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
#align primrec.comp Primrec.comp
theorem succ : Primrec Nat.succ :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.succ
#align primrec.succ Primrec.succ
theorem pred : Primrec Nat.pred :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.pred
#align primrec.pred Primrec.pred
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => Nat.Primrec.of_eq h fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl, Primrec.encode.comp⟩
#align primrec.encode_iff Primrec.encode_iff
theorem ofNat_iff {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Primrec fun n => f (ofNat α n) :=
dom_denumerable.trans <| nat_iff.symm.trans encode_iff
#align primrec.of_nat_iff Primrec.ofNat_iff
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Primrec (ofNat α) :=
ofNat_iff.1 Primrec.id
#align primrec.of_nat Primrec.ofNat
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => some (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| pred.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
#align primrec.option_some_iff Primrec.option_some_iff
theorem of_equiv {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e :=
letI : Primcodable β := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 Primrec.encode
#align primrec.of_equiv Primrec.of_equiv
theorem of_equiv_symm {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e.symm :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 (show Primrec fun a => encode (e (e.symm a)) by simp [Primrec.encode])
#align primrec.of_equiv_symm Primrec.of_equiv_symm
theorem of_equiv_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → β} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv_symm.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv.comp⟩
#align primrec.of_equiv_iff Primrec.of_equiv_iff
theorem of_equiv_symm_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e.symm (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv_symm.comp⟩
#align primrec.of_equiv_symm_iff Primrec.of_equiv_symm_iff
end Primrec
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance prod {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primcodable (α × β) :=
⟨((casesOn' zero ((casesOn' zero .succ).comp (pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1; · simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp⟩
#align primcodable.prod Primcodable.prod
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem fst {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.fst α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp left)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
#align primrec.fst Primrec.fst
theorem snd {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.snd α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp right)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
#align primrec.snd Primrec.snd
theorem pair {α β γ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => (f a, g a) :=
((casesOn1 0
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp <|
.pair (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hf) (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hg))).comp
(@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq
fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
#align primrec.pair Primrec.pair
theorem unpair : Primrec Nat.unpair :=
(pair (nat_iff.2 .left) (nat_iff.2 .right)).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align primrec.unpair Primrec.unpair
theorem list_get?₁ : ∀ l : List α, Primrec l.get?
| [] => dom_denumerable.2 zero
| a :: l =>
dom_denumerable.2 <|
(casesOn1 (encode a).succ <| dom_denumerable.1 <| list_get?₁ l).of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
#align primrec.list_nth₁ Primrec.list_get?₁
end Primrec
/-- `Primrec₂ f` means `f` is a binary primitive recursive function.
This is technically unnecessary since we can always curry all
the arguments together, but there are enough natural two-arg
functions that it is convenient to express this directly. -/
def Primrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
#align primrec₂ Primrec₂
/-- `PrimrecPred p` means `p : α → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive predicate, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecPred {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :=
Primrec fun a => decide (p a)
#align primrec_pred PrimrecPred
/-- `PrimrecRel p` means `p : α → β → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive relation, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → β → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecRel {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (s : α → β → Prop)
[∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] :=
Primrec₂ fun a b => decide (s a b)
#align primrec_rel PrimrecRel
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Primrec₂ f := hf
theorem of_eq {f g : α → β → σ} (hg : Primrec₂ f) (H : ∀ a b, f a b = g a b) : Primrec₂ g :=
(by funext a b; apply H : f = g) ▸ hg
#align primrec₂.of_eq Primrec₂.of_eq
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (_ : β) => x :=
Primrec.const _
#align primrec₂.const Primrec₂.const
protected theorem pair : Primrec₂ (@Prod.mk α β) :=
.pair .fst .snd
#align primrec₂.pair Primrec₂.pair
theorem left : Primrec₂ fun (a : α) (_ : β) => a :=
.fst
#align primrec₂.left Primrec₂.left
theorem right : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (b : β) => b :=
.snd
#align primrec₂.right Primrec₂.right
theorem natPair : Primrec₂ Nat.pair := by simp [Primrec₂, Primrec]; constructor
#align primrec₂.mkpair Primrec₂.natPair
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ → α} : Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.comp natPair, fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair⟩
#align primrec₂.unpaired Primrec₂.unpaired
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ} : Nat.Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
#align primrec₂.unpaired' Primrec₂.unpaired'
theorem encode_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => encode (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.encode_iff
#align primrec₂.encode_iff Primrec₂.encode_iff
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => some (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.option_some_iff
#align primrec₂.option_some_iff Primrec₂.option_some_iff
theorem ofNat_iff {α β σ} [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔ Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => f (ofNat α m) (ofNat β n) :=
(Primrec.ofNat_iff.trans <| by simp).trans unpaired
#align primrec₂.of_nat_iff Primrec₂.ofNat_iff
theorem uncurry {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec (Function.uncurry f) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
rw [show Function.uncurry f = fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 from funext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => rfl]; rfl
#align primrec₂.uncurry Primrec₂.uncurry
theorem curry {f : α × β → σ} : Primrec₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ Primrec f := by
rw [← uncurry, Function.uncurry_curry]
#align primrec₂.curry Primrec₂.curry
end Primrec₂
section Comp
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem Primrec.comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
#align primrec.comp₂ Primrec.comp₂
theorem Primrec₂.comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec h) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
Primrec.comp hf (hg.pair hh)
#align primrec₂.comp Primrec₂.comp
theorem Primrec₂.comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Primrec₂ f)
(hg : Primrec₂ g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
#align primrec₂.comp₂ Primrec₂.comp₂
theorem PrimrecPred.comp {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α → β} :
PrimrecPred p → Primrec f → PrimrecPred fun a => p (f a) :=
Primrec.comp
#align primrec_pred.comp PrimrecPred.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp {R : β → γ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec f → Primrec g → PrimrecPred fun a => R (f a) (g a) :=
Primrec₂.comp
#align primrec_rel.comp PrimrecRel.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp₂ {R : γ → δ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β → γ}
{g : α → β → δ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec₂ f → Primrec₂ g → PrimrecRel fun a b => R (f a b) (g a b) :=
PrimrecRel.comp
#align primrec_rel.comp₂ PrimrecRel.comp₂
end Comp
theorem PrimrecPred.of_eq {α} [Primcodable α] {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (H : ∀ a, p a ↔ q a) : PrimrecPred q :=
Primrec.of_eq hp fun a => Bool.decide_congr (H a)
#align primrec_pred.of_eq PrimrecPred.of_eq
theorem PrimrecRel.of_eq {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {r s : α → β → Prop}
[∀ a b, Decidable (r a b)] [∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] (hr : PrimrecRel r)
(H : ∀ a b, r a b ↔ s a b) : PrimrecRel s :=
Primrec₂.of_eq hr fun a b => Bool.decide_congr (H a b)
#align primrec_rel.of_eq PrimrecRel.of_eq
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem swap {f : α → β → σ} (h : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec₂ (swap f) :=
h.comp₂ Primrec₂.right Primrec₂.left
#align primrec₂.swap Primrec₂.swap
theorem nat_iff {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec₂ f ↔ Nat.Primrec
(.unpaired fun m n => encode <| (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) := by
have :
∀ (a : Option α) (b : Option β),
Option.map (fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2)
(Option.bind a fun a : α => Option.map (Prod.mk a) b) =
Option.bind a fun a => Option.map (f a) b := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
simp [Primrec₂, Primrec, this]
#align primrec₂.nat_iff Primrec₂.nat_iff
theorem nat_iff' {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔
Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => Option.map (f a) (@decode β _ n) :=
nat_iff.trans <| unpaired'.trans encode_iff
#align primrec₂.nat_iff' Primrec₂.nat_iff'
end Primrec₂
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun _ => rfl
#align primrec.to₂ Primrec.to₂
theorem nat_rec {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ × β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => n.rec (motive := fun _ => β) (f a) fun n IH => g a (n, IH) :=
Primrec₂.nat_iff.2 <|
((Nat.Primrec.casesOn' .zero <|
(Nat.Primrec.prec hf <|
.comp hg <|
Nat.Primrec.left.pair <|
(Nat.Primrec.left.comp .right).pair <|
Nat.Primrec.pred.comp <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp .right).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.right.pair <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp Nat.Primrec.left).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.id.pair <| (@Primcodable.prim α).comp Nat.Primrec.left).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, id_eq, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val, decode_nat,
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map, Option.map_some']
cases' @decode α _ n.unpair.1 with a; · rfl
simp only [Nat.pred_eq_sub_one, encode_some, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, encodek, Option.map_some',
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map]
induction' n.unpair.2 with m <;> simp [encodek]
simp [*, encodek]
#align primrec.nat_elim Primrec.nat_rec
theorem nat_rec' {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ × β → β}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).rec (motive := fun _ => β) (g a) fun n IH => h a (n, IH) :=
(nat_rec hg hh).comp .id hf
#align primrec.nat_elim' Primrec.nat_rec'
theorem nat_rec₁ {f : ℕ → α → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec (Nat.rec a f) :=
nat_rec' .id (const a) <| comp₂ hf Primrec₂.right
#align primrec.nat_elim₁ Primrec.nat_rec₁
theorem nat_casesOn' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn (f a) (g a) : β) :=
nat_rec hf <| hg.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| comp₂ fst Primrec₂.right
#align primrec.nat_cases' Primrec.nat_casesOn'
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => ((f a).casesOn (g a) (h a) : β) :=
(nat_casesOn' hg hh).comp .id hf
#align primrec.nat_cases Primrec.nat_casesOn
theorem nat_casesOn₁ {f : ℕ → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec f) :
Primrec (fun (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn a f : α)) :=
nat_casesOn .id (const a) (comp₂ hf .right)
#align primrec.nat_cases₁ Primrec.nat_casesOn₁
theorem nat_iterate {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => (h a)^[f a] (g a) :=
(nat_rec' hf hg (hh.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| snd.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq fun a => by
induction f a <;> simp [*, -Function.iterate_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
#align primrec.nat_iterate Primrec.nat_iterate
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Primrec o)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
encode_iff.1 <|
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 ho) (encode_iff.2 hf) <|
pred.comp₂ <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.2 <|
(Primrec₂.nat_iff'.1 hg).comp₂ ((@Primrec.encode α _).comp fst).to₂
Primrec₂.right).of_eq
fun a => by cases' o a with b <;> simp [encodek]
#align primrec.option_cases Primrec.option_casesOn
theorem option_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(option_casesOn hf (const none) hg).of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
#align primrec.option_bind Primrec.option_bind
theorem option_bind₁ {f : α → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun o => Option.bind o f :=
option_bind .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
#align primrec.option_bind₁ Primrec.option_bind₁
theorem option_map {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) :=
(option_bind hf (option_some.comp₂ hg)).of_eq fun x => by cases f x <;> rfl
#align primrec.option_map Primrec.option_map
theorem option_map₁ {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec (Option.map f) :=
option_map .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
#align primrec.option_map₁ Primrec.option_map₁
theorem option_iget [Inhabited α] : Primrec (@Option.iget α _) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const <| @default α _) .right).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
#align primrec.option_iget Primrec.option_iget
theorem option_isSome : Primrec (@Option.isSome α) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const false) (const true).to₂).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
#align primrec.option_is_some Primrec.option_isSome
theorem option_getD : Primrec₂ (@Option.getD α) :=
Primrec.of_eq (option_casesOn Primrec₂.left Primrec₂.right .right) fun ⟨o, a⟩ => by
cases o <;> rfl
#align primrec.option_get_or_else Primrec.option_getD
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).bind (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [encodek] using h.comp fst ((@Primrec.encode β _).comp snd), fun h =>
option_bind (Primrec.decode.comp snd) <| h.comp (fst.comp fst) snd⟩
#align primrec.bind_decode_iff Primrec.bind_decode_iff
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
simp only [Option.map_eq_bind]
exact bind_decode_iff.trans Primrec₂.option_some_iff
#align primrec.map_decode_iff Primrec.map_decode_iff
theorem nat_add : Primrec₂ ((· + ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.add
#align primrec.nat_add Primrec.nat_add
theorem nat_sub : Primrec₂ ((· - ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.sub
#align primrec.nat_sub Primrec.nat_sub
theorem nat_mul : Primrec₂ ((· * ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.mul
#align primrec.nat_mul Primrec.nat_mul
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Primrec c) (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => bif (c a) then (f a) else (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
#align primrec.cond Primrec.cond
theorem ite {c : α → Prop} [DecidablePred c] {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : PrimrecPred c)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => if c a then f a else g a := by
simpa [Bool.cond_decide] using cond hc hf hg
#align primrec.ite Primrec.ite
theorem nat_le : PrimrecRel ((· ≤ ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_casesOn nat_sub (const true) (const false).to₂).of_eq fun p => by
dsimp [swap]
cases' e : p.1 - p.2 with n
· simp [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 e]
· simp [not_le.2 (Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e)]
#align primrec.nat_le Primrec.nat_le
theorem nat_min : Primrec₂ (@min ℕ _) :=
ite nat_le fst snd
#align primrec.nat_min Primrec.nat_min
theorem nat_max : Primrec₂ (@max ℕ _) :=
ite (nat_le.comp fst snd) snd fst
#align primrec.nat_max Primrec.nat_max
theorem dom_bool (f : Bool → α) : Primrec f :=
(cond .id (const (f true)) (const (f false))).of_eq fun b => by cases b <;> rfl
#align primrec.dom_bool Primrec.dom_bool
theorem dom_bool₂ (f : Bool → Bool → α) : Primrec₂ f :=
(cond fst ((dom_bool (f true)).comp snd) ((dom_bool (f false)).comp snd)).of_eq fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
cases a <;> rfl
#align primrec.dom_bool₂ Primrec.dom_bool₂
protected theorem not : Primrec not :=
dom_bool _
#align primrec.bnot Primrec.not
protected theorem and : Primrec₂ and :=
dom_bool₂ _
#align primrec.band Primrec.and
protected theorem or : Primrec₂ or :=
dom_bool₂ _
#align primrec.bor Primrec.or
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.not {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : PrimrecPred p) :
PrimrecPred fun a => ¬p a :=
(Primrec.not.comp hp).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align primrec.not PrimrecPred.not
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.and {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∧ q a :=
(Primrec.and.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align primrec.and PrimrecPred.and
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.or {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∨ q a :=
(Primrec.or.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
#align primrec.or PrimrecPred.or
-- Porting note: It is unclear whether we want to boolean versions
-- of these lemmas, just the prop versions, or both
-- The boolean versions are often actually easier to use
-- but did not exist in Lean 3
protected theorem beq [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (@BEq.beq α _) :=
have : PrimrecRel fun a b : ℕ => a = b :=
(PrimrecPred.and nat_le nat_le.swap).of_eq fun a => by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
(this.comp₂ (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq
fun a b => encode_injective.eq_iff
protected theorem eq [DecidableEq α] : PrimrecRel (@Eq α) := Primrec.beq
#align primrec.eq Primrec.eq
theorem nat_lt : PrimrecRel ((· < ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_le.comp snd fst).not.of_eq fun p => by simp
#align primrec.nat_lt Primrec.nat_lt
theorem option_guard {p : α → β → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (p a b)] (hp : PrimrecRel p) {f : α → β}
(hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun a => Option.guard (p a) (f a) :=
ite (hp.comp Primrec.id hf) (option_some_iff.2 hf) (const none)
#align primrec.option_guard Primrec.option_guard
theorem option_orElse : Primrec₂ ((· <|> ·) : Option α → Option α → Option α) :=
(option_casesOn fst snd (fst.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun ⟨o₁, o₂⟩ => by cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> rfl
#align primrec.option_orelse Primrec.option_orElse
protected theorem decode₂ : Primrec (decode₂ α) :=
option_bind .decode <|
option_guard (Primrec.beq.comp₂ (by exact encode_iff.mpr snd) (by exact fst.comp fst)) snd
#align primrec.decode₂ Primrec.decode₂
theorem list_findIdx₁ {p : α → β → Bool} (hp : Primrec₂ p) :
∀ l : List β, Primrec fun a => l.findIdx (p a)
| [] => const 0
| a :: l => (cond (hp.comp .id (const a)) (const 0) (succ.comp (list_findIdx₁ hp l))).of_eq fun n =>
by simp [List.findIdx_cons]
#align primrec.list_find_index₁ Primrec.list_findIdx₁
theorem list_indexOf₁ [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) : Primrec fun a => l.indexOf a :=
list_findIdx₁ (.swap .beq) l
#align primrec.list_index_of₁ Primrec.list_indexOf₁
theorem dom_fintype [Finite α] (f : α → σ) : Primrec f :=
let ⟨l, _, m⟩ := Finite.exists_univ_list α
option_some_iff.1 <| by
haveI := decidableEqOfEncodable α
refine ((list_get?₁ (l.map f)).comp (list_indexOf₁ l)).of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [List.get?_map, List.indexOf_get? (m a), Option.map_some']
#align primrec.dom_fintype Primrec.dom_fintype
-- Porting note: These are new lemmas
-- I added it because it actually simplified the proofs
-- and because I couldn't understand the original proof
/-- A function is `PrimrecBounded` if its size is bounded by a primitive recursive function -/
def PrimrecBounded (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ g : α → ℕ, Primrec g ∧ ∀ x, encode (f x) ≤ g x
theorem nat_findGreatest {f : α → ℕ} {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x n, Decidable (p x n)]
(hf : Primrec f) (hp : PrimrecRel p) : Primrec fun x => (f x).findGreatest (p x) :=
(nat_rec' (h := fun x nih => if p x (nih.1 + 1) then nih.1 + 1 else nih.2)
hf (const 0) (ite (hp.comp fst (snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp))
(snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp) (snd.comp snd))).of_eq fun x => by
induction f x <;> simp [Nat.findGreatest, *]
/-- To show a function `f : α → ℕ` is primitive recursive, it is enough to show that the function
is bounded by a primitive recursive function and that its graph is primitive recursive -/
theorem of_graph {f : α → ℕ} (h₁ : PrimrecBounded f)
(h₂ : PrimrecRel fun a b => f a = b) : Primrec f := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨g, pg, hg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x⟩
refine (nat_findGreatest pg h₂).of_eq fun n => ?_
exact (Nat.findGreatest_spec (P := fun b => f n = b) (hg n) rfl).symm
-- We show that division is primitive recursive by showing that the graph is
theorem nat_div : Primrec₂ ((· / ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) := by
refine of_graph ⟨_, fst, fun p => Nat.div_le_self _ _⟩ ?_
have : PrimrecRel fun (a : ℕ × ℕ) (b : ℕ) => (a.2 = 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨
(0 < a.2 ∧ b * a.2 ≤ a.1 ∧ a.1 < (b + 1) * a.2) :=
PrimrecPred.or
(.and (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp (fst |> snd.comp)) (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp snd))
(.and (nat_lt.comp (const 0) (fst |> snd.comp)) <|
.and (nat_le.comp (nat_mul.comp snd (fst |> snd.comp)) (fst |> fst.comp))
(nat_lt.comp (fst.comp fst) (nat_mul.comp (Primrec.succ.comp snd) (snd.comp fst))))
refine this.of_eq ?_
rintro ⟨a, k⟩ q
if H : k = 0 then simp [H, eq_comm]
else
have : q * k ≤ a ∧ a < (q + 1) * k ↔ q = a / k := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← (@Nat.lt_succ _ q), Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H),
Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H)]
simpa [H, zero_lt_iff, eq_comm (b := q)]
#align primrec.nat_div Primrec.nat_div
theorem nat_mod : Primrec₂ ((· % ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
(nat_sub.comp fst (nat_mul.comp snd nat_div)).to₂.of_eq fun m n => by
apply Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add
simp [add_comm (m % n), Nat.div_add_mod]
#align primrec.nat_mod Primrec.nat_mod
theorem nat_bodd : Primrec Nat.bodd :=
(Primrec.beq.comp (nat_mod.comp .id (const 2)) (const 1)).of_eq fun n => by
cases H : n.bodd <;> simp [Nat.mod_two_of_bodd, H]
#align primrec.nat_bodd Primrec.nat_bodd
theorem nat_div2 : Primrec Nat.div2 :=
(nat_div.comp .id (const 2)).of_eq fun n => n.div2_val.symm
#align primrec.nat_div2 Primrec.nat_div2
-- Porting note: this is no longer used
-- theorem nat_boddDiv2 : Primrec Nat.boddDiv2 := pair nat_bodd nat_div2
#noalign primrec.nat_bodd_div2
-- Porting note: bit0 is deprecated
theorem nat_double : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n) :=
nat_mul.comp (const _) Primrec.id
#align primrec.nat_bit0 Primrec.nat_double
-- Porting note: bit1 is deprecated
theorem nat_double_succ : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n + 1) :=
nat_double |> Primrec.succ.comp
#align primrec.nat_bit1 Primrec.nat_double_succ
-- Porting note: this is no longer used
-- theorem nat_div_mod : Primrec₂ fun n k : ℕ => (n / k, n % k) := pair nat_div nat_mod
#noalign primrec.nat_div_mod
end Primrec
section
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
variable (H : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (@decode (List β) _ n))
open Primrec
private def prim : Primcodable (List β) := ⟨H⟩
private theorem list_casesOn' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun b l => h a (b, l) :=
letI := prim H
have :
@Primrec _ (Option σ) _ _ fun a =>
(@decode (Option (β × List β)) _ (encode (f a))).map fun o => Option.casesOn o (g a) (h a) :=
((@map_decode_iff _ (Option (β × List β)) _ _ _ _ _).2 <|
to₂ <|
option_casesOn snd (hg.comp fst) (hh.comp₂ (fst.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) Primrec₂.right)).comp
.id (encode_iff.2 hf)
option_some_iff.1 <| this.of_eq fun a => by cases' f a with b l <;> simp [encodek]
private theorem list_foldl' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → σ × β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a) := by
letI := prim H
let G (a : α) (IH : σ × List β) : σ × List β := List.casesOn IH.2 IH fun b l => (h a (IH.1, b), l)
have hG : Primrec₂ G := list_casesOn' H (snd.comp snd) snd <|
to₂ <|
pair (hh.comp (fst.comp fst) <| pair ((fst.comp snd).comp fst) (fst.comp snd))
(snd.comp snd)
let F := fun (a : α) (n : ℕ) => (G a)^[n] (g a, f a)
have hF : Primrec fun a => (F a (encode (f a))).1 :=
(fst.comp <|
nat_iterate (encode_iff.2 hf) (pair hg hf) <|
hG)
suffices ∀ a n, F a n = (((f a).take n).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a), (f a).drop n) by
refine hF.of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [this, List.take_all_of_le (length_le_encode _)]
introv
dsimp only [F]
generalize f a = l
generalize g a = x
induction' n with n IH generalizing l x
· rfl
simp only [iterate_succ, comp_apply]
cases' l with b l <;> simp [IH]
private theorem list_cons' : (haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ (@List.cons β)) :=
letI := prim H
encode_iff.1 (succ.comp <| Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 fst) (encode_iff.2 snd))
private theorem list_reverse' :
haveI := prim H
Primrec (@List.reverse β) :=
letI := prim H
(list_foldl' H .id (const []) <| to₂ <| ((list_cons' H).comp snd fst).comp snd).of_eq
(suffices ∀ l r, List.foldl (fun (s : List β) (b : β) => b :: s) r l = List.reverseAux l r from
fun l => this l []
fun l => by induction l <;> simp [*, List.reverseAux])
end
namespace Primcodable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β]
open Primrec
instance sum : Primcodable (Sum α β) :=
⟨Primrec.nat_iff.1 <|
(encode_iff.2
(cond nat_bodd
(((@Primrec.decode β _).comp nat_div2).option_map <|
to₂ <| nat_double_succ.comp (Primrec.encode.comp snd))
(((@Primrec.decode α _).comp nat_div2).option_map <|
to₂ <| nat_double.comp (Primrec.encode.comp snd)))).of_eq
fun n =>
show _ = encode (decodeSum n) by
simp only [decodeSum, Nat.boddDiv2_eq]
cases Nat.bodd n <;> simp [decodeSum]
· cases @decode α _ n.div2 <;> rfl
· cases @decode β _ n.div2 <;> rfl⟩
#align primcodable.sum Primcodable.sum
instance list : Primcodable (List α) :=
⟨letI H := @Primcodable.prim (List ℕ) _
have : Primrec₂ fun (a : α) (o : Option (List ℕ)) => o.map (List.cons (encode a)) :=
option_map snd <| (list_cons' H).comp ((@Primrec.encode α _).comp (fst.comp fst)) snd
have :
Primrec fun n =>
(ofNat (List ℕ) n).reverse.foldl
(fun o m => (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => o.map (List.cons (encode a))) (some []) :=
list_foldl' H ((list_reverse' H).comp (.ofNat (List ℕ))) (const (some []))
(Primrec.comp₂ (bind_decode_iff.2 <| .swap this) Primrec₂.right)
nat_iff.1 <|
(encode_iff.2 this).of_eq fun n => by
rw [List.foldl_reverse]
apply Nat.case_strong_induction_on n; · simp
intro n IH; simp
cases' @decode α _ n.unpair.1 with a; · rfl
simp only [decode_eq_ofNat, Option.some.injEq, Option.some_bind, Option.map_some']
suffices ∀ (o : Option (List ℕ)) (p), encode o = encode p →
encode (Option.map (List.cons (encode a)) o) = encode (Option.map (List.cons a) p) from
this _ _ (IH _ (Nat.unpair_right_le n))
intro o p IH
cases o <;> cases p
· rfl
· injection IH
· injection IH
· exact congr_arg (fun k => (Nat.pair (encode a) k).succ.succ) (Nat.succ.inj IH)⟩
#align primcodable.list Primcodable.list
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem sum_inl : Primrec (@Sum.inl α β) :=
encode_iff.1 <| nat_double.comp Primrec.encode
#align primrec.sum_inl Primrec.sum_inl
theorem sum_inr : Primrec (@Sum.inr α β) :=
encode_iff.1 <| nat_double_succ.comp Primrec.encode
#align primrec.sum_inr Primrec.sum_inr
theorem sum_casesOn {f : α → Sum β γ} {g : α → β → σ} {h : α → γ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec₂ g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) : @Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(cond (nat_bodd.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf)
(option_map (Primrec.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hh)
(option_map (Primrec.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hg)).of_eq
fun a => by cases' f a with b c <;> simp [Nat.div2_val, encodek]
#align primrec.sum_cases Primrec.sum_casesOn
theorem list_cons : Primrec₂ (@List.cons α) :=
list_cons' Primcodable.prim
#align primrec.list_cons Primrec.list_cons
theorem list_casesOn {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β → σ} :
Primrec f →
Primrec g →
Primrec₂ h → @Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun b l => h a (b, l) :=
list_casesOn' Primcodable.prim
#align primrec.list_cases Primrec.list_casesOn
theorem list_foldl {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → σ × β → σ} :
Primrec f →
Primrec g → Primrec₂ h → Primrec fun a => (f a).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a) :=
list_foldl' Primcodable.prim
#align primrec.list_foldl Primrec.list_foldl
theorem list_reverse : Primrec (@List.reverse α) :=
list_reverse' Primcodable.prim
#align primrec.list_reverse Primrec.list_reverse
theorem list_foldr {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × σ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).foldr (fun b s => h a (b, s)) (g a) :=
(list_foldl (list_reverse.comp hf) hg <| to₂ <| hh.comp fst <| (pair snd fst).comp snd).of_eq
fun a => by simp [List.foldl_reverse]
#align primrec.list_foldr Primrec.list_foldr
theorem list_head? : Primrec (@List.head? α) :=
(list_casesOn .id (const none) (option_some_iff.2 <| fst.comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun l => by
cases l <;> rfl
#align primrec.list_head' Primrec.list_head?
theorem list_headI [Inhabited α] : Primrec (@List.headI α _) :=
(option_iget.comp list_head?).of_eq fun l => l.head!_eq_head?.symm
#align primrec.list_head Primrec.list_headI
theorem list_tail : Primrec (@List.tail α) :=
(list_casesOn .id (const []) (snd.comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
#align primrec.list_tail Primrec.list_tail
theorem list_rec {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β × σ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.recOn (f a) (g a) fun b l IH => h a (b, l, IH) :=
let F (a : α) := (f a).foldr (fun (b : β) (s : List β × σ) => (b :: s.1, h a (b, s))) ([], g a)
have : Primrec F :=
list_foldr hf (pair (const []) hg) <|
to₂ <| pair ((list_cons.comp fst (fst.comp snd)).comp snd) hh
(snd.comp this).of_eq fun a => by
suffices F a = (f a, List.recOn (f a) (g a) fun b l IH => h a (b, l, IH)) by rw [this]
dsimp [F]
induction' f a with b l IH <;> simp [*]
#align primrec.list_rec Primrec.list_rec
theorem list_get? : Primrec₂ (@List.get? α) :=
let F (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :=
l.foldl
(fun (s : Sum ℕ α) (a : α) =>
Sum.casesOn s (@Nat.casesOn (fun _ => Sum ℕ α) · (Sum.inr a) Sum.inl) Sum.inr)
(Sum.inl n)
have hF : Primrec₂ F :=
(list_foldl fst (sum_inl.comp snd)
((sum_casesOn fst (nat_casesOn snd (sum_inr.comp <| snd.comp fst) (sum_inl.comp snd).to₂).to₂
(sum_inr.comp snd).to₂).comp
snd).to₂).to₂
have :
@Primrec _ (Option α) _ _ fun p : List α × ℕ => Sum.casesOn (F p.1 p.2) (fun _ => none) some :=
sum_casesOn hF (const none).to₂ (option_some.comp snd).to₂
this.to₂.of_eq fun l n => by
dsimp; symm
induction' l with a l IH generalizing n; · rfl
cases' n with n
· dsimp [F]
clear IH
induction' l with _ l IH <;> simp [*]
· apply IH
#align primrec.list_nth Primrec.list_get?
theorem list_getD (d : α) : Primrec₂ fun l n => List.getD l n d := by
simp only [List.getD_eq_getD_get?]
exact option_getD.comp₂ list_get? (const _)
#align primrec.list_nthd Primrec.list_getD
theorem list_getI [Inhabited α] : Primrec₂ (@List.getI α _) :=
list_getD _
#align primrec.list_inth Primrec.list_getI
theorem list_append : Primrec₂ ((· ++ ·) : List α → List α → List α) :=
(list_foldr fst snd <| to₂ <| comp (@list_cons α _) snd).to₂.of_eq fun l₁ l₂ => by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
#align primrec.list_append Primrec.list_append
theorem list_concat : Primrec₂ fun l (a : α) => l ++ [a] :=
list_append.comp fst (list_cons.comp snd (const []))
#align primrec.list_concat Primrec.list_concat
theorem list_map {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) :=
(list_foldr hf (const []) <|
to₂ <| list_cons.comp (hg.comp fst (fst.comp snd)) (snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a => by induction f a <;> simp [*]
#align primrec.list_map Primrec.list_map
theorem list_range : Primrec List.range :=
(nat_rec' .id (const []) ((list_concat.comp snd fst).comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun n => by
simp; induction n <;> simp [*, List.range_succ]
#align primrec.list_range Primrec.list_range
theorem list_join : Primrec (@List.join α) :=
(list_foldr .id (const []) <| to₂ <| comp (@list_append α _) snd).of_eq fun l => by
dsimp; induction l <;> simp [*]
#align primrec.list_join Primrec.list_join
theorem list_bind {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → List σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec (fun a => (f a).bind (g a)) := list_join.comp (list_map hf hg)
theorem optionToList : Primrec (Option.toList : Option α → List α) :=
(option_casesOn Primrec.id (const [])
((list_cons.comp Primrec.id (const [])).comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq
(fun o => by rcases o <;> simp)
theorem listFilterMap {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → Option σ}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) : Primrec fun a => (f a).filterMap (g a) :=
(list_bind hf (comp₂ optionToList hg)).of_eq
fun _ ↦ Eq.symm <| List.filterMap_eq_bind_toList _ _
theorem list_length : Primrec (@List.length α) :=
(list_foldr (@Primrec.id (List α) _) (const 0) <| to₂ <| (succ.comp <| snd.comp snd).to₂).of_eq
fun l => by dsimp; induction l <;> simp [*]
#align primrec.list_length Primrec.list_length
theorem list_findIdx {f : α → List β} {p : α → β → Bool}
(hf : Primrec f) (hp : Primrec₂ p) : Primrec fun a => (f a).findIdx (p a) :=
(list_foldr hf (const 0) <|
to₂ <| cond (hp.comp fst <| fst.comp snd) (const 0) (succ.comp <| snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a => by dsimp; induction f a <;> simp [List.findIdx_cons, *]
#align primrec.list_find_index Primrec.list_findIdx
theorem list_indexOf [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (@List.indexOf α _) :=
to₂ <| list_findIdx snd <| Primrec.beq.comp₂ snd.to₂ (fst.comp fst).to₂
#align primrec.list_index_of Primrec.list_indexOfₓ
theorem nat_strong_rec (f : α → ℕ → σ) {g : α → List σ → Option σ} (hg : Primrec₂ g)
(H : ∀ a n, g a ((List.range n).map (f a)) = some (f a n)) : Primrec₂ f :=
suffices Primrec₂ fun a n => (List.range n).map (f a) from
Primrec₂.option_some_iff.1 <|
(list_get?.comp (this.comp fst (succ.comp snd)) snd).to₂.of_eq fun a n => by
simp [List.get?_range (Nat.lt_succ_self n)]
Primrec₂.option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_rec (const (some []))
(to₂ <|
option_bind (snd.comp snd) <|
to₂ <|
option_map (hg.comp (fst.comp fst) snd)
(to₂ <| list_concat.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))).of_eq
fun a n => by
simp; induction' n with n IH; · rfl
simp [IH, H, List.range_succ]
#align primrec.nat_strong_rec Primrec.nat_strong_rec
theorem listLookup [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (List.lookup : α → List (α × β) → Option β) :=
(to₂ <| list_rec snd (const none) <|
to₂ <|
cond (Primrec.beq.comp (fst.comp fst) (fst.comp $ fst.comp snd))
(option_some.comp $ snd.comp $ fst.comp snd)
(snd.comp $ snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a ps => by
induction' ps with p ps ih <;> simp[List.lookup, *]
cases ha : a == p.1 <;> simp[ha]
| Mathlib/Computability/Primrec.lean | 1,174 | 1,233 | theorem nat_omega_rec' (f : β → σ) {m : β → ℕ} {l : β → List β} {g : β → List σ → Option σ}
(hm : Primrec m) (hl : Primrec l) (hg : Primrec₂ g)
(Ord : ∀ b, ∀ b' ∈ l b, m b' < m b)
(H : ∀ b, g b ((l b).map f) = some (f b)) : Primrec f := by |
haveI : DecidableEq β := Encodable.decidableEqOfEncodable β
let mapGraph (M : List (β × σ)) (bs : List β) : List σ := bs.bind (Option.toList <| M.lookup ·)
let bindList (b : β) : ℕ → List β := fun n ↦ n.rec [b] fun _ bs ↦ bs.bind l
let graph (b : β) : ℕ → List (β × σ) := fun i ↦ i.rec [] fun i ih ↦
(bindList b (m b - i)).filterMap fun b' ↦ (g b' $ mapGraph ih (l b')).map (b', ·)
have mapGraph_primrec : Primrec₂ mapGraph :=
to₂ <| list_bind snd <| optionToList.comp₂ <| listLookup.comp₂ .right (fst.comp₂ .left)
have bindList_primrec : Primrec₂ (bindList) :=
nat_rec' snd
(list_cons.comp fst (const []))
(to₂ <| list_bind (snd.comp snd) (hl.comp₂ .right))
have graph_primrec : Primrec₂ (graph) :=
to₂ <| nat_rec' snd (const []) <|
to₂ <| listFilterMap
(bindList_primrec.comp
(fst.comp fst)
(nat_sub.comp (hm.comp $ fst.comp fst) (fst.comp snd))) <|
to₂ <| option_map
(hg.comp snd (mapGraph_primrec.comp (snd.comp $ snd.comp fst) (hl.comp snd)))
(Primrec₂.pair.comp₂ (snd.comp₂ .left) .right)
have : Primrec (fun b => ((graph b (m b + 1)).get? 0).map Prod.snd) :=
option_map (list_get?.comp (graph_primrec.comp Primrec.id (succ.comp hm)) (const 0))
(snd.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)
exact option_some_iff.mp <| this.of_eq <| fun b ↦ by
have graph_eq_map_bindList (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ m b + 1) :
graph b i = (bindList b (m b + 1 - i)).map fun x ↦ (x, f x) := by
have bindList_eq_nil : bindList b (m b + 1) = [] :=
have bindList_m_lt (k : ℕ) : ∀ b' ∈ bindList b k, m b' < m b + 1 - k := by
induction' k with k ih <;> simp [bindList]
intro a₂ a₁ ha₁ ha₂
have : k ≤ m b :=
Nat.lt_succ.mp (by simpa using Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub $ Nat.zero_lt_of_lt (ih a₁ ha₁))
have : m a₁ ≤ m b - k :=
Nat.lt_succ.mp (by rw [← Nat.succ_sub this]; simpa using ih a₁ ha₁)
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Ord a₁ a₂ ha₂) this
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr
(by intro b' ha'; by_contra; simpa using bindList_m_lt (m b + 1) b' ha')
have mapGraph_graph {bs bs' : List β} (has : bs' ⊆ bs) :
mapGraph (bs.map $ fun x => (x, f x)) bs' = bs'.map f := by
induction' bs' with b bs' ih <;> simp [mapGraph]
· have : b ∈ bs ∧ bs' ⊆ bs := by simpa using has
rcases this with ⟨ha, has'⟩
simpa [List.lookup_graph f ha] using ih has'
have graph_succ : ∀ i, graph b (i + 1) =
(bindList b (m b - i)).filterMap fun b' =>
(g b' <| mapGraph (graph b i) (l b')).map (b', ·) := fun _ => rfl
have bindList_succ : ∀ i, bindList b (i + 1) = (bindList b i).bind l := fun _ => rfl
induction' i with i ih
· symm; simpa [graph] using bindList_eq_nil
· simp [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, graph_succ, bindList_succ, ih (Nat.le_of_lt hi),
Nat.succ_sub (Nat.lt_succ.mp hi)]
apply List.filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some.mpr
intro b' ha'; simp; rw [mapGraph_graph]
· exact H b'
· exact (List.infix_bind_of_mem ha' l).subset
simp [graph_eq_map_bindList (m b + 1) (Nat.le_refl _), bindList]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Eval
#align_import number_theory.primes_congruent_one from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Primes congruent to one
We prove that, for any positive `k : ℕ`, there are infinitely many primes `p` such that
`p ≡ 1 [MOD k]`.
-/
namespace Nat
open Polynomial Nat Filter
open scoped Nat
/-- For any positive `k : ℕ` there exists an arbitrarily large prime `p` such that
`p ≡ 1 [MOD k]`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PrimesCongruentOne.lean | 26 | 57 | theorem exists_prime_gt_modEq_one {k : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (hk0 : k ≠ 0) :
∃ p : ℕ, Nat.Prime p ∧ n < p ∧ p ≡ 1 [MOD k] := by |
rcases (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hk0).eq_or_lt with (rfl | hk1)
· rcases exists_infinite_primes (n + 1) with ⟨p, hnp, hp⟩
exact ⟨p, hp, hnp, modEq_one⟩
let b := k * (n !)
have hgt : 1 < (eval (↑b) (cyclotomic k ℤ)).natAbs := by
rcases le_iff_exists_add'.1 hk1.le with ⟨k, rfl⟩
have hb : 2 ≤ b := le_mul_of_le_of_one_le hk1 n.factorial_pos
calc
1 ≤ b - 1 := le_tsub_of_add_le_left hb
_ < (eval (b : ℤ) (cyclotomic (k + 1) ℤ)).natAbs :=
sub_one_lt_natAbs_cyclotomic_eval hk1 (succ_le_iff.1 hb).ne'
let p := minFac (eval (↑b) (cyclotomic k ℤ)).natAbs
haveI hprime : Fact p.Prime := ⟨minFac_prime (ne_of_lt hgt).symm⟩
have hroot : IsRoot (cyclotomic k (ZMod p)) (castRingHom (ZMod p) b) := by
have : ((b : ℤ) : ZMod p) = ↑(Int.castRingHom (ZMod p) b) := by simp
rw [IsRoot.def, ← map_cyclotomic_int k (ZMod p), eval_map, coe_castRingHom,
← Int.cast_natCast, this, eval₂_hom, Int.coe_castRingHom, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
apply Int.dvd_natAbs.1
exact mod_cast minFac_dvd (eval (↑b) (cyclotomic k ℤ)).natAbs
have hpb : ¬p ∣ b :=
hprime.1.coprime_iff_not_dvd.1 (coprime_of_root_cyclotomic hk0.bot_lt hroot).symm
refine ⟨p, hprime.1, not_le.1 fun habs => ?_, ?_⟩
· exact hpb (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (dvd_factorial (minFac_pos _) habs) _)
· have hdiv : orderOf (b : ZMod p) ∣ p - 1 :=
ZMod.orderOf_dvd_card_sub_one (mt (CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff _ _ _).1 hpb)
haveI : NeZero (k : ZMod p) :=
NeZero.of_not_dvd (ZMod p) fun hpk => hpb (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left hpk _)
have : k = orderOf (b : ZMod p) := (isRoot_cyclotomic_iff.mp hroot).eq_orderOf
rw [← this] at hdiv
exact ((modEq_iff_dvd' hprime.1.pos).2 hdiv).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
#align_import order.complete_boolean_algebra from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"71b36b6f3bbe3b44e6538673819324d3ee9fcc96"
/-!
# Frames, completely distributive lattices and complete Boolean algebras
In this file we define and provide API for (co)frames, completely distributive lattices and
complete Boolean algebras.
We distinguish two different distributivity properties:
1. `inf_iSup_eq : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i` (finite `⊓` distributes over infinite `⨆`).
This is required by `Frame`, `CompleteDistribLattice`, and `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`
(`Coframe`, etc., require the dual property).
2. `iInf_iSup_eq : (⨅ i, ⨆ j, f i j) = ⨆ s, ⨅ i, f i (s i)`
(infinite `⨅` distributes over infinite `⨆`).
This stronger property is called "completely distributive",
and is required by `CompletelyDistribLattice` and `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`.
## Typeclasses
* `Order.Frame`: Frame: A complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`.
* `Order.Coframe`: Coframe: A complete lattice whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`.
* `CompleteDistribLattice`: Complete distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose `⊓` and `⊔`
distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`: Complete Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompletelyDistribLattice`: Completely distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose
`⨅` and `⨆` satisfy `iInf_iSup_eq`.
* `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`: Complete Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: Complete atomic Boolean algebra:
A complete Boolean algebra which is additionally completely distributive.
(This implies that it's (co)atom(ist)ic.)
A set of opens gives rise to a topological space precisely if it forms a frame. Such a frame is also
completely distributive, but not all frames are. `Filter` is a coframe but not a completely
distributive lattice.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Complete Heyting algebra*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_Heyting_algebra)
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {κ : ι → Sort w'}
/-- A frame, aka complete Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
class Order.Frame (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α where
/-- `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf (a : α) (s : Set α) : a ⊓ sSup s ≤ ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b
#align order.frame Order.Frame
/-- A coframe, aka complete Brouwer algebra or complete co-Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice
whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
class Order.Coframe (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α where
/-- `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf (a : α) (s : Set α) : ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b ≤ a ⊔ sInf s
#align order.coframe Order.Coframe
open Order
/-- A complete distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⊔` and `⊓` respectively
distribute over `⨅` and `⨆`. -/
class CompleteDistribLattice (α : Type*) extends Frame α, Coframe α
#align complete_distrib_lattice CompleteDistribLattice
/-- In a complete distributive lattice, `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
add_decl_doc CompleteDistribLattice.iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf
/-- A completely distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⨅` and `⨆`
distribute over each other. -/
class CompletelyDistribLattice (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α where
protected iInf_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} {κ : ι → Type u} (f : ∀ a, κ a → α) :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)
theorem le_iInf_iSup [CompleteLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)) ≤ ⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b :=
iSup_le fun _ => le_iInf fun a => le_trans (iInf_le _ a) (le_iSup _ _)
theorem iInf_iSup_eq [CompletelyDistribLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a) :=
(le_antisymm · le_iInf_iSup) <| calc
_ = ⨅ a : range (range <| f ·), ⨆ b : a.1, b.1 := by
simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iInf_range, iSup_subtype, iSup_range]
_ = _ := CompletelyDistribLattice.iInf_iSup_eq _
_ ≤ _ := iSup_le fun g => by
refine le_trans ?_ <| le_iSup _ fun a => Classical.choose (g ⟨_, a, rfl⟩).2
refine le_iInf fun a => le_trans (iInf_le _ ⟨range (f a), a, rfl⟩) ?_
rw [← Classical.choose_spec (g ⟨_, a, rfl⟩).2]
theorem iSup_iInf_le [CompleteLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ a, ⨅ b, f a b) ≤ ⨅ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨆ a, f a (g a) :=
le_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem iSup_iInf_eq [CompletelyDistribLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ a, ⨅ b, f a b) = ⨅ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨆ a, f a (g a) := by
refine le_antisymm iSup_iInf_le ?_
rw [iInf_iSup_eq]
refine iSup_le fun g => ?_
have ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, ∀ b, ∃ f, ∃ h : a = g f, h ▸ b = f (g f) := of_not_not fun h => by
push_neg at h
choose h hh using h
have := hh _ h rfl
contradiction
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ a)
refine le_iInf fun b => ?_
obtain ⟨h, rfl, rfl⟩ := ha b
exact iInf_le _ _
instance (priority := 100) CompletelyDistribLattice.toCompleteDistribLattice
[CompletelyDistribLattice α] : CompleteDistribLattice α where
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf a s := calc
_ = ⨅ b : s, ⨆ x : Bool, cond x a b := by simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iSup_bool_eq, cond]
_ = _ := iInf_iSup_eq
_ ≤ _ := iSup_le fun f => by
if h : ∀ i, f i = false then
simp [h, iInf_subtype, ← sInf_eq_iInf]
else
have ⟨i, h⟩ : ∃ i, f i = true := by simpa using h
refine le_trans (iInf_le _ i) ?_
simp [h]
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s := calc
_ = ⨅ x : Bool, ⨆ y : cond x PUnit s, match x with | true => a | false => y.1 := by
simp_rw [iInf_bool_eq, cond, iSup_const, iSup_subtype, sSup_eq_iSup]
_ = _ := iInf_iSup_eq
_ ≤ _ := by
simp_rw [iInf_bool_eq]
refine iSup_le fun g => le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (g false).1)
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (g false).2)
rfl
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLinearOrder.toCompletelyDistribLattice [CompleteLinearOrder α] :
CompletelyDistribLattice α where
iInf_iSup_eq {α β} g := by
let lhs := ⨅ a, ⨆ b, g a b
let rhs := ⨆ h : ∀ a, β a, ⨅ a, g a (h a)
suffices lhs ≤ rhs from le_antisymm this le_iInf_iSup
if h : ∃ x, rhs < x ∧ x < lhs then
rcases h with ⟨x, hr, hl⟩
suffices rhs ≥ x from nomatch not_lt.2 this hr
have : ∀ a, ∃ b, x < g a b := fun a =>
lt_iSup_iff.1 <| lt_of_not_le fun h =>
lt_irrefl x (lt_of_lt_of_le hl (le_trans (iInf_le _ a) h))
choose f hf using this
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ f)
exact le_iInf fun a => le_of_lt (hf a)
else
refine le_of_not_lt fun hrl : rhs < lhs => not_le_of_lt hrl ?_
replace h : ∀ x, x ≤ rhs ∨ lhs ≤ x := by
simpa only [not_exists, not_and_or, not_or, not_lt] using h
have : ∀ a, ∃ b, rhs < g a b := fun a =>
lt_iSup_iff.1 <| lt_of_lt_of_le hrl (iInf_le _ a)
choose f hf using this
have : ∀ a, lhs ≤ g a (f a) := fun a =>
(h (g a (f a))).resolve_left (by simpa using hf a)
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ f)
exact le_iInf fun a => this _
section Frame
variable [Frame α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
instance OrderDual.instCoframe : Coframe αᵒᵈ where
__ := instCompleteLattice
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf := @Frame.inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf α _
#align order_dual.coframe OrderDual.instCoframe
theorem inf_sSup_eq : a ⊓ sSup s = ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b :=
(Frame.inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf _ _).antisymm iSup_inf_le_inf_sSup
#align inf_Sup_eq inf_sSup_eq
theorem sSup_inf_eq : sSup s ⊓ b = ⨆ a ∈ s, a ⊓ b := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using @inf_sSup_eq α _ s b
#align Sup_inf_eq sSup_inf_eq
theorem iSup_inf_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ a = ⨆ i, f i ⊓ a := by
rw [iSup, sSup_inf_eq, iSup_range]
#align supr_inf_eq iSup_inf_eq
theorem inf_iSup_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using iSup_inf_eq f a
#align inf_supr_eq inf_iSup_eq
theorem iSup₂_inf_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) :
(⨆ (i) (j), f i j) ⊓ a = ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ⊓ a := by
simp only [iSup_inf_eq]
#align bsupr_inf_eq iSup₂_inf_eq
theorem inf_iSup₂_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) :
(a ⊓ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⨆ (i) (j), a ⊓ f i j := by
simp only [inf_iSup_eq]
#align inf_bsupr_eq inf_iSup₂_eq
theorem iSup_inf_iSup {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α} :
((⨆ i, f i) ⊓ ⨆ j, g j) = ⨆ i : ι × ι', f i.1 ⊓ g i.2 := by
simp_rw [iSup_inf_eq, inf_iSup_eq, iSup_prod]
#align supr_inf_supr iSup_inf_iSup
theorem biSup_inf_biSup {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) ⊓ ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) = ⨆ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, f (p : ι × ι').1 ⊓ g p.2 := by
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_inf_iSup]
exact (Equiv.surjective _).iSup_congr (Equiv.Set.prod s t).symm fun x => rfl
#align bsupr_inf_bsupr biSup_inf_biSup
theorem sSup_inf_sSup : sSup s ⊓ sSup t = ⨆ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : α × α).1 ⊓ p.2 := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_inf_biSup]
#align Sup_inf_Sup sSup_inf_sSup
theorem iSup_disjoint_iff {f : ι → α} : Disjoint (⨆ i, f i) a ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (f i) a := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, iSup_inf_eq, iSup_eq_bot]
#align supr_disjoint_iff iSup_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iSup_iff {f : ι → α} : Disjoint a (⨆ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint a (f i) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using @iSup_disjoint_iff
#align disjoint_supr_iff disjoint_iSup_iff
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteBooleanAlgebra.lean | 233 | 235 | theorem iSup₂_disjoint_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} :
Disjoint (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) a ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (f i j) a := by |
simp_rw [iSup_disjoint_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FinsuppVectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.mv_polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials over commutative rings
This file contains basic facts about multivariate polynomials over commutative rings, for example
that the monomials form a basis.
## Main definitions
* `restrictTotalDegree σ R m`: the subspace of multivariate polynomials indexed by `σ` over the
commutative ring `R` of total degree at most `m`.
* `restrictDegree σ R m`: the subspace of multivariate polynomials indexed by `σ` over the
commutative ring `R` such that the degree in each individual variable is at most `m`.
## Main statements
* The multivariate polynomial ring over a commutative semiring of characteristic `p` has
characteristic `p`, and similarly for `CharZero`.
* `basisMonomials`: shows that the monomials form a basis of the vector space of multivariate
polynomials.
## TODO
Generalise to noncommutative (semi)rings
-/
noncomputable section
open Set LinearMap Submodule
open Polynomial
universe u v
variable (σ : Type u) (R : Type v) [CommSemiring R] (p m : ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
section CharP
instance [CharP R p] : CharP (MvPolynomial σ R) p where
cast_eq_zero_iff' n := by rw [← C_eq_coe_nat, ← C_0, C_inj, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R p]
end CharP
section CharZero
instance [CharZero R] : CharZero (MvPolynomial σ R) where
cast_injective x y hxy := by rwa [← C_eq_coe_nat, ← C_eq_coe_nat, C_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at hxy
end CharZero
section Homomorphism
theorem mapRange_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(f : R →+* S) : Finsupp.mapRange f f.map_zero p = map f p := by
rw [p.as_sum, Finsupp.mapRange_finset_sum, map_sum (map f)]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_monomial, ← single_eq_monomial, Finsupp.mapRange_single, single_eq_monomial]
#align mv_polynomial.map_range_eq_map MvPolynomial.mapRange_eq_map
end Homomorphism
section Degree
variable {σ}
/-- The submodule of polynomials that are sum of monomials in the set `s`. -/
def restrictSupport (s : Set (σ →₀ ℕ)) : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.supported _ _ s
/-- `restrictSupport R s` has a canonical `R`-basis indexed by `s`. -/
def basisRestrictSupport (s : Set (σ →₀ ℕ)) : Basis s R (restrictSupport R s) where
repr := Finsupp.supportedEquivFinsupp s
theorem restrictSupport_mono {s t : Set (σ →₀ ℕ)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
restrictSupport R s ≤ restrictSupport R t := Finsupp.supported_mono h
variable (σ)
/-- The submodule of polynomials of total degree less than or equal to `m`. -/
def restrictTotalDegree (m : ℕ) : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
restrictSupport R { n | (n.sum fun _ e => e) ≤ m }
#align mv_polynomial.restrict_total_degree MvPolynomial.restrictTotalDegree
/-- The submodule of polynomials such that the degree with respect to each individual variable is
less than or equal to `m`. -/
def restrictDegree (m : ℕ) : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
restrictSupport R { n | ∀ i, n i ≤ m }
#align mv_polynomial.restrict_degree MvPolynomial.restrictDegree
variable {R}
theorem mem_restrictTotalDegree (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p ∈ restrictTotalDegree σ R m ↔ p.totalDegree ≤ m := by
rw [totalDegree, Finset.sup_le_iff]
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.mem_restrict_total_degree MvPolynomial.mem_restrictTotalDegree
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 113 | 116 | theorem mem_restrictDegree (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) :
p ∈ restrictDegree σ R n ↔ ∀ s ∈ p.support, ∀ i, (s : σ →₀ ℕ) i ≤ n := by |
rw [restrictDegree, restrictSupport, Finsupp.mem_supported]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
#align_import data.polynomial.ring_division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efcf8022aac8e01df8d302dcebdbc25d6a886c8"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We prove basic results about univariate polynomials.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {p q : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {z : S}
(hz : aeval z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < p.natDegree :=
natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root hp (algebraMap R S) hz inj
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pos_of_aeval_root Polynomial.natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root
theorem degree_pos_of_aeval_root [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {z : S} (hz : aeval z p = 0)
(inj : ∀ x : R, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < p.degree :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root hp hz inj)
#align polynomial.degree_pos_of_aeval_root Polynomial.degree_pos_of_aeval_root
theorem modByMonic_eq_of_dvd_sub (hq : q.Monic) {p₁ p₂ : R[X]} (h : q ∣ p₁ - p₂) :
p₁ %ₘ q = p₂ %ₘ q := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨f, sub_eq⟩ := h
refine (div_modByMonic_unique (p₂ /ₘ q + f) _ hq ⟨?_, degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq⟩).2
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mp sub_eq, mul_add, ← add_assoc, modByMonic_add_div _ hq, add_comm]
#align polynomial.mod_by_monic_eq_of_dvd_sub Polynomial.modByMonic_eq_of_dvd_sub
theorem add_modByMonic (p₁ p₂ : R[X]) : (p₁ + p₂) %ₘ q = p₁ %ₘ q + p₂ %ₘ q := by
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· cases' subsingleton_or_nontrivial R with hR hR
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· exact
(div_modByMonic_unique (p₁ /ₘ q + p₂ /ₘ q) _ hq
⟨by
rw [mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, modByMonic_add_div _ hq, ← add_assoc,
add_comm (q * _), modByMonic_add_div _ hq],
(degree_add_le _ _).trans_lt
(max_lt (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq) (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq))⟩).2
· simp_rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic _ hq]
#align polynomial.add_mod_by_monic Polynomial.add_modByMonic
theorem smul_modByMonic (c : R) (p : R[X]) : c • p %ₘ q = c • (p %ₘ q) := by
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· cases' subsingleton_or_nontrivial R with hR hR
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· exact
(div_modByMonic_unique (c • (p /ₘ q)) (c • (p %ₘ q)) hq
⟨by rw [mul_smul_comm, ← smul_add, modByMonic_add_div p hq],
(degree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq)⟩).2
· simp_rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic _ hq]
#align polynomial.smul_mod_by_monic Polynomial.smul_modByMonic
/-- `_ %ₘ q` as an `R`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def modByMonicHom (q : R[X]) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p %ₘ q
map_add' := add_modByMonic
map_smul' := smul_modByMonic
#align polynomial.mod_by_monic_hom Polynomial.modByMonicHom
theorem neg_modByMonic (p mod : R[X]) : (-p) %ₘ mod = - (p %ₘ mod) :=
(modByMonicHom mod).map_neg p
theorem sub_modByMonic (a b mod : R[X]) : (a - b) %ₘ mod = a %ₘ mod - b %ₘ mod :=
(modByMonicHom mod).map_sub a b
end
section
variable [Ring S]
theorem aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root [Algebra R S] {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.Monic) {x : S}
(hx : aeval x q = 0) : aeval x (p %ₘ q) = aeval x p := by
--`eval₂_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root` doesn't work here as it needs commutativity
rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div p hq, _root_.map_sub, _root_.map_mul, hx, zero_mul,
sub_zero]
#align polynomial.aeval_mod_by_monic_eq_self_of_root Polynomial.aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root
end
end CommRing
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
instance : NoZeroDivisors R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h := by
rw [← leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero ?_
rw [← leadingCoeff_zero, ← leadingCoeff_mul, h]
theorem natDegree_mul (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) : (p*q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree (mul_ne_zero hp hq),
Nat.cast_add, ← degree_eq_natDegree hp, ← degree_eq_natDegree hq, degree_mul]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul Polynomial.natDegree_mul
theorem trailingDegree_mul : (p * q).trailingDegree = p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, zero_mul, trailingDegree_zero, top_add]
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mul_zero, trailingDegree_zero, add_top]
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq,
trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (mul_ne_zero hp hq), natTrailingDegree_mul hp hq]
apply WithTop.coe_add
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_mul Polynomial.trailingDegree_mul
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (p ^ n) = n * natDegree p := by
classical
obtain rfl | hp := eq_or_ne p 0
· obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0 <;> simp [*]
exact natDegree_pow' $ by
rw [← leadingCoeff_pow, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]; exact pow_ne_zero _ hp
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pow Polynomial.natDegree_pow
theorem degree_le_mul_left (p : R[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree (p * q) := by
classical
exact if hp : p = 0 then by simp only [hp, zero_mul, le_refl]
else by
rw [degree_mul, degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq];
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
#align polynomial.degree_le_mul_left Polynomial.degree_le_mul_left
theorem natDegree_le_of_dvd {p q : R[X]} (h1 : p ∣ q) (h2 : q ≠ 0) : p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree := by
rcases h1 with ⟨q, rfl⟩; rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at h2
rw [natDegree_mul h2.1 h2.2]; exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_of_dvd Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_dvd
theorem degree_le_of_dvd {p q : R[X]} (h1 : p ∣ q) (h2 : q ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
rcases h1 with ⟨q, rfl⟩; rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at h2
exact degree_le_mul_left p h2.2
#align polynomial.degree_le_of_dvd Polynomial.degree_le_of_dvd
theorem eq_zero_of_dvd_of_degree_lt {p q : R[X]} (h₁ : p ∣ q) (h₂ : degree q < degree p) :
q = 0 := by
by_contra hc
exact (lt_iff_not_ge _ _).mp h₂ (degree_le_of_dvd h₁ hc)
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_degree_lt Polynomial.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_degree_lt
theorem eq_zero_of_dvd_of_natDegree_lt {p q : R[X]} (h₁ : p ∣ q) (h₂ : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
q = 0 := by
by_contra hc
exact (lt_iff_not_ge _ _).mp h₂ (natDegree_le_of_dvd h₁ hc)
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_natDegree_lt
theorem not_dvd_of_degree_lt {p q : R[X]} (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : q.degree < p.degree) : ¬p ∣ q := by
by_contra hcontra
exact h0 (eq_zero_of_dvd_of_degree_lt hcontra hl)
#align polynomial.not_dvd_of_degree_lt Polynomial.not_dvd_of_degree_lt
theorem not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt {p q : R[X]} (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : q.natDegree < p.natDegree) :
¬p ∣ q := by
by_contra hcontra
exact h0 (eq_zero_of_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hcontra hl)
#align polynomial.not_dvd_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt
/-- This lemma is useful for working with the `intDegree` of a rational function. -/
theorem natDegree_sub_eq_of_prod_eq {p₁ p₂ q₁ q₂ : R[X]} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ 0) (hq₁ : q₁ ≠ 0)
(hp₂ : p₂ ≠ 0) (hq₂ : q₂ ≠ 0) (h_eq : p₁ * q₂ = p₂ * q₁) :
(p₁.natDegree : ℤ) - q₁.natDegree = (p₂.natDegree : ℤ) - q₂.natDegree := by
rw [sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add]
norm_cast
rw [← natDegree_mul hp₁ hq₂, ← natDegree_mul hp₂ hq₁, h_eq]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sub_eq_of_prod_eq Polynomial.natDegree_sub_eq_of_prod_eq
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_of_isUnit (h : IsUnit p) : natDegree p = 0 := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := h.exists_right_inv
have := natDegree_mul (left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one hq) (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one hq)
rw [hq, natDegree_one, eq_comm, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact this.1
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_zero_of_is_unit Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_of_isUnit
theorem degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit [Nontrivial R] (h : IsUnit p) : degree p = 0 :=
(natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero.mp <| natDegree_eq_zero_of_isUnit h).antisymm
(zero_le_degree_iff.mpr h.ne_zero)
#align polynomial.degree_eq_zero_of_is_unit Polynomial.degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit
@[simp]
theorem degree_coe_units [Nontrivial R] (u : R[X]ˣ) : degree (u : R[X]) = 0 :=
degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit ⟨u, rfl⟩
#align polynomial.degree_coe_units Polynomial.degree_coe_units
/-- Characterization of a unit of a polynomial ring over an integral domain `R`.
See `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent` when `R` is a commutative ring. -/
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit p ↔ ∃ r : R, IsUnit r ∧ C r = p :=
⟨fun hp =>
⟨p.coeff 0,
let h := eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero (natDegree_eq_zero_of_isUnit hp)
⟨isUnit_C.1 (h ▸ hp), h.symm⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, hr, hrp⟩ => hrp ▸ isUnit_C.2 hr⟩
#align polynomial.is_unit_iff Polynomial.isUnit_iff
theorem not_isUnit_of_degree_pos (p : R[X])
(hpl : 0 < p.degree) : ¬ IsUnit p := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· simp [Subsingleton.elim p 0] at hpl
intro h
simp [degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit h] at hpl
theorem not_isUnit_of_natDegree_pos (p : R[X])
(hpl : 0 < p.natDegree) : ¬ IsUnit p :=
not_isUnit_of_degree_pos _ (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp hpl)
variable [CharZero R]
end NoZeroDivisors
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem irreducible_of_monic (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f = 1 ∨ g = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h f g hf hg hp => (h.2 f g hp.symm).imp hf.eq_one_of_isUnit hg.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h =>
⟨hp1 ∘ hp.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun f g hfg =>
(h (g * C f.leadingCoeff) (f * C g.leadingCoeff) ?_ ?_ ?_).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one f _)
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one g _)⟩⟩
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, mul_comm, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, ← C_mul, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, hp.leadingCoeff, C_1, mul_one,
mul_comm, ← hfg]
#align polynomial.irreducible_of_monic Polynomial.irreducible_of_monic
theorem Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree (hp : p.Monic) :
Irreducible p ↔
p ≠ 1 ∧ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f.natDegree = 0 ∨ g.natDegree = 0 := by
by_cases hp1 : p = 1; · simp [hp1]
rw [irreducible_of_monic hp hp1, and_iff_right hp1]
refine forall₄_congr fun a b ha hb => ?_
rw [ha.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, hb.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one]
#align polynomial.monic.irreducible_iff_nat_degree Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree
theorem Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree' (hp : p.Monic) : Irreducible p ↔ p ≠ 1 ∧
∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → g.natDegree ∉ Ioc 0 (p.natDegree / 2) := by
simp_rw [hp.irreducible_iff_natDegree, mem_Ioc, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le zero_lt_two, mul_two]
apply and_congr_right'
constructor <;> intro h f g hf hg he <;> subst he
· rw [hf.natDegree_mul hg, add_le_add_iff_right]
exact fun ha => (h f g hf hg rfl).elim (ha.1.trans_le ha.2).ne' ha.1.ne'
· simp_rw [hf.natDegree_mul hg, pos_iff_ne_zero] at h
contrapose! h
obtain hl | hl := le_total f.natDegree g.natDegree
· exact ⟨g, f, hg, hf, mul_comm g f, h.1, add_le_add_left hl _⟩
· exact ⟨f, g, hf, hg, rfl, h.2, add_le_add_right hl _⟩
#align polynomial.monic.irreducible_iff_nat_degree' Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree'
/-- Alternate phrasing of `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree'` where we only have to check
one divisor at a time. -/
theorem Monic.irreducible_iff_lt_natDegree_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ q, Monic q → natDegree q ∈ Finset.Ioc 0 (natDegree p / 2) → ¬ q ∣ p := by
rw [hp.irreducible_iff_natDegree', and_iff_right hp1]
constructor
· rintro h g hg hdg ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact h f g (hg.of_mul_monic_left hp) hg (mul_comm f g) hdg
· rintro h f g - hg rfl hdg
exact h g hg hdg (dvd_mul_left g f)
theorem Monic.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff (hm : p.Monic) (hnd : p.natDegree = 2) :
¬Irreducible p ↔ ∃ c₁ c₂, p.coeff 0 = c₁ * c₂ ∧ p.coeff 1 = c₁ + c₂ := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· simp [natDegree_of_subsingleton] at hnd
rw [hm.irreducible_iff_natDegree', and_iff_right, hnd]
· push_neg
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl, hdb⟩
simp only [zero_lt_two, Nat.div_self, ge_iff_le,
Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton, zero_add, mem_singleton] at hdb
have hda := hnd
rw [ha.natDegree_mul hb, hdb] at hda
use a.coeff 0, b.coeff 0, mul_coeff_zero a b
simpa only [nextCoeff, hnd, add_right_cancel hda, hdb] using ha.nextCoeff_mul hb
· rintro ⟨c₁, c₂, hmul, hadd⟩
refine
⟨X + C c₁, X + C c₂, monic_X_add_C _, monic_X_add_C _, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, hnd, Finset.sum_range_succ, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Finset.sum_range_one, ← hnd, hm.coeff_natDegree, hnd, hmul, hadd, C_mul, C_add, C_1]
ring
· rw [mem_Ioc, natDegree_X_add_C _]
simp
· rintro rfl
simp [natDegree_one] at hnd
#align polynomial.monic.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff Polynomial.Monic.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff
theorem root_mul : IsRoot (p * q) a ↔ IsRoot p a ∨ IsRoot q a := by
simp_rw [IsRoot, eval_mul, mul_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.root_mul Polynomial.root_mul
theorem root_or_root_of_root_mul (h : IsRoot (p * q) a) : IsRoot p a ∨ IsRoot q a :=
root_mul.1 h
#align polynomial.root_or_root_of_root_mul Polynomial.root_or_root_of_root_mul
end NoZeroDivisors
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
instance : IsDomain R[X] :=
NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
end Ring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
theorem Monic.C_dvd_iff_isUnit {p : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) {a : R} :
C a ∣ p ↔ IsUnit a :=
⟨fun h => isUnit_iff_dvd_one.mpr <|
hp.coeff_natDegree ▸ (C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff _ _).mp h p.natDegree,
fun ha => (ha.map C).dvd⟩
theorem degree_pos_of_not_isUnit_of_dvd_monic {a p : R[X]} (ha : ¬ IsUnit a)
(hap : a ∣ p) (hp : Monic p) :
0 < degree a :=
lt_of_not_ge <| fun h => ha <| by
rw [Polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h] at hap ⊢
simpa [hp.C_dvd_iff_isUnit, isUnit_C] using hap
theorem natDegree_pos_of_not_isUnit_of_dvd_monic {a p : R[X]} (ha : ¬ IsUnit a)
(hap : a ∣ p) (hp : Monic p) :
0 < natDegree a :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mpr <| degree_pos_of_not_isUnit_of_dvd_monic ha hap hp
theorem degree_pos_of_monic_of_not_isUnit {a : R[X]} (hu : ¬ IsUnit a) (ha : Monic a) :
0 < degree a :=
degree_pos_of_not_isUnit_of_dvd_monic hu dvd_rfl ha
theorem natDegree_pos_of_monic_of_not_isUnit {a : R[X]} (hu : ¬ IsUnit a) (ha : Monic a) :
0 < natDegree a :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mpr <| degree_pos_of_monic_of_not_isUnit hu ha
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero_of_smul (P : R[X]) (h : ∀ r : R, r • P = 0 → r = 0) :
∀ (Q : R[X]), P * Q = 0 → Q = 0 := by
intro Q hQ
suffices ∀ i, P.coeff i • Q = 0 by
rw [← leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
apply h
simpa [ext_iff, mul_comm Q.leadingCoeff] using fun i ↦ congr_arg (·.coeff Q.natDegree) (this i)
apply Nat.strong_decreasing_induction
· use P.natDegree
intro i hi
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hi, zero_smul]
intro l IH
obtain _|hl := (natDegree_smul_le (P.coeff l) Q).lt_or_eq
· apply eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero_of_smul _ h (P.coeff l • Q)
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, mul_left_comm, hQ, mul_zero]
suffices P.coeff l * Q.leadingCoeff = 0 by
rwa [← leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← coeff_natDegree, coeff_smul, hl, coeff_natDegree, smul_eq_mul]
let m := Q.natDegree
suffices (P * Q).coeff (l + m) = P.coeff l * Q.leadingCoeff by rw [← this, hQ, coeff_zero]
rw [coeff_mul]
apply Finset.sum_eq_single (l, m) _ (by simp)
simp only [Finset.mem_antidiagonal, ne_eq, Prod.forall, Prod.mk.injEq, not_and]
intro i j hij H
obtain hi|rfl|hi := lt_trichotomy i l
· have hj : m < j := by omega
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hj, mul_zero]
· omega
· rw [← coeff_C_mul, ← smul_eq_C_mul, IH _ hi, coeff_zero]
termination_by Q => Q.natDegree
open nonZeroDivisors in
/-- *McCoy theorem*: a polynomial `P : R[X]` is a zerodivisor if and only if there is `a : R`
such that `a ≠ 0` and `a • P = 0`. -/
theorem nmem_nonZeroDivisors_iff {P : R[X]} : P ∉ R[X]⁰ ↔ ∃ a : R, a ≠ 0 ∧ a • P = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hP ↦ ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ h1 ↦ ha <| C_eq_zero.1 <| (h1 _) <| smul_eq_C_mul a ▸ h⟩
by_contra! h
obtain ⟨Q, hQ⟩ := _root_.nmem_nonZeroDivisors_iff.1 hP
refine hQ.2 (eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero_of_smul P (fun a ha ↦ ?_) Q (mul_comm P _ ▸ hQ.1))
contrapose! ha
exact h a ha
open nonZeroDivisors in
protected lemma mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff {P : R[X]} : P ∈ R[X]⁰ ↔ ∀ a : R, a • P = 0 → a = 0 := by
simpa [not_imp_not] using (nmem_nonZeroDivisors_iff (P := P)).not
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
/- Porting note: the ML3 proof no longer worked because of a conflict in the
inferred type and synthesized type for `DecidableRel` when using `Nat.le_find_iff` from
`Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div` After some discussion on [Zulip]
(https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/decidability.20leakage)
introduced `Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_eq_nat_find_of_nonzero` to contain the issue
-/
/-- The multiplicity of `a` as root of a nonzero polynomial `p` is at least `n` iff
`(X - a) ^ n` divides `p`. -/
theorem le_rootMultiplicity_iff {p : R[X]} (p0 : p ≠ 0) {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ rootMultiplicity a p ↔ (X - C a) ^ n ∣ p := by
classical
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_nat_find_of_nonzero p0, @Nat.le_find_iff _ (_)]
simp_rw [Classical.not_not]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h m hm => (pow_dvd_pow _ hm).trans h⟩
cases' n with n;
· rw [pow_zero]
apply one_dvd;
· exact h n n.lt_succ_self
#align polynomial.le_root_multiplicity_iff Polynomial.le_rootMultiplicity_iff
theorem rootMultiplicity_le_iff {p : R[X]} (p0 : p ≠ 0) (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
rootMultiplicity a p ≤ n ↔ ¬(X - C a) ^ (n + 1) ∣ p := by
rw [← (le_rootMultiplicity_iff p0).not, not_le, Nat.lt_add_one_iff]
#align polynomial.root_multiplicity_le_iff Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_le_iff
theorem pow_rootMultiplicity_not_dvd {p : R[X]} (p0 : p ≠ 0) (a : R) :
¬(X - C a) ^ (rootMultiplicity a p + 1) ∣ p := by rw [← rootMultiplicity_le_iff p0]
#align polynomial.pow_root_multiplicity_not_dvd Polynomial.pow_rootMultiplicity_not_dvd
theorem X_sub_C_pow_dvd_iff {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} :
(X - C t) ^ n ∣ p ↔ X ^ n ∣ p.comp (X + C t) := by
convert (map_dvd_iff <| algEquivAevalXAddC t).symm using 2
simp [C_eq_algebraMap]
theorem comp_X_add_C_eq_zero_iff {p : R[X]} (t : R) :
p.comp (X + C t) = 0 ↔ p = 0 := AddEquivClass.map_eq_zero_iff (algEquivAevalXAddC t)
theorem comp_X_add_C_ne_zero_iff {p : R[X]} (t : R) :
p.comp (X + C t) ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := Iff.not <| comp_X_add_C_eq_zero_iff t
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
p.rootMultiplicity t = (p.comp (X + C t)).rootMultiplicity 0 := by
classical
simp_rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, comp_X_add_C_eq_zero_iff]
congr; ext; congr 1
rw [C_0, sub_zero]
convert (multiplicity.multiplicity_map_eq <| algEquivAevalXAddC t).symm using 2
simp [C_eq_algebraMap]
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree' {p : R[X]} :
p.rootMultiplicity 0 = p.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp only [h, rootMultiplicity_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [rootMultiplicity_le_iff h, map_zero, sub_zero, X_pow_dvd_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨p.natTrailingDegree,
fun h' ↦ trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.2 h <| h' <| Nat.lt.base _⟩
· rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff h, map_zero, sub_zero, X_pow_dvd_iff]
exact fun _ ↦ coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
p.rootMultiplicity t = (p.comp (X + C t)).natTrailingDegree :=
rootMultiplicity_eq_rootMultiplicity.trans rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree'
theorem eval_divByMonic_eq_trailingCoeff_comp {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
(p /ₘ (X - C t) ^ p.rootMultiplicity t).eval t = (p.comp (X + C t)).trailingCoeff := by
obtain rfl | hp := eq_or_ne p 0
· rw [zero_divByMonic, eval_zero, zero_comp, trailingCoeff_zero]
have mul_eq := p.pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq t
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t
set g := p /ₘ (X - C t) ^ m
have : (g.comp (X + C t)).coeff 0 = g.eval t := by
rw [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero, eval_comp, eval_add, eval_X, eval_C, zero_add]
rw [← congr_arg (comp · <| X + C t) mul_eq, mul_comp, pow_comp, sub_comp, X_comp, C_comp,
add_sub_cancel_right, ← reverse_leadingCoeff, reverse_X_pow_mul, reverse_leadingCoeff,
trailingCoeff, Nat.le_zero.1 (natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero <|
this ▸ eval_divByMonic_pow_rootMultiplicity_ne_zero t hp), this]
section nonZeroDivisors
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
theorem Monic.mem_nonZeroDivisors {p : R[X]} (h : p.Monic) : p ∈ R[X]⁰ :=
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff.2 fun _ hx ↦ (mul_left_eq_zero_iff h).1 hx
theorem mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (h : p.leadingCoeff ∈ R⁰) : p ∈ R[X]⁰ := by
refine mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff.2 fun x hx ↦ leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 ?_
by_contra hx'
rw [← mul_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff h] at hx'
simp only [← leadingCoeff_mul' hx', hx, leadingCoeff_zero, not_true] at hx'
end nonZeroDivisors
theorem rootMultiplicity_mul_X_sub_C_pow {p : R[X]} {a : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0) :
(p * (X - C a) ^ n).rootMultiplicity a = p.rootMultiplicity a + n := by
have h2 := monic_X_sub_C a |>.pow n |>.mul_left_ne_zero h
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [rootMultiplicity_le_iff h2, add_assoc, add_comm n, ← add_assoc, pow_add,
dvd_cancel_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C a |>.pow n |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
exact pow_rootMultiplicity_not_dvd h a
· rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff h2, pow_add]
exact mul_dvd_mul_right (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd p a) _
/-- The multiplicity of `a` as root of `(X - a) ^ n` is `n`. -/
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_pow [Nontrivial R] (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
rootMultiplicity a ((X - C a) ^ n) = n := by
have := rootMultiplicity_mul_X_sub_C_pow (a := a) (n := n) C.map_one_ne_zero
rwa [rootMultiplicity_C, map_one, one_mul, zero_add] at this
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.root_multiplicity_X_sub_C_pow Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_pow
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_self [Nontrivial R] {x : R} :
rootMultiplicity x (X - C x) = 1 :=
pow_one (X - C x) ▸ rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_pow x 1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.root_multiplicity_X_sub_C_self Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_self
-- Porting note: swapped instance argument order
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] [DecidableEq R] {x y : R} :
rootMultiplicity x (X - C y) = if x = y then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with hxy
· rw [hxy]
exact rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_self
exact rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (mt root_X_sub_C.mp (Ne.symm hxy))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.root_multiplicity_X_sub_C Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C
/-- The multiplicity of `p + q` is at least the minimum of the multiplicities. -/
theorem rootMultiplicity_add {p q : R[X]} (a : R) (hzero : p + q ≠ 0) :
min (rootMultiplicity a p) (rootMultiplicity a q) ≤ rootMultiplicity a (p + q) := by
rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff hzero]
exact min_pow_dvd_add (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd p a) (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd q a)
#align polynomial.root_multiplicity_add Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_add
theorem le_rootMultiplicity_mul {p q : R[X]} (x : R) (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
rootMultiplicity x p + rootMultiplicity x q ≤ rootMultiplicity x (p * q) := by
rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff hpq, pow_add]
exact mul_dvd_mul (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd p x) (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd q x)
theorem rootMultiplicity_mul' {p q : R[X]} {x : R}
(hpq : (p /ₘ (X - C x) ^ p.rootMultiplicity x).eval x *
(q /ₘ (X - C x) ^ q.rootMultiplicity x).eval x ≠ 0) :
rootMultiplicity x (p * q) = rootMultiplicity x p + rootMultiplicity x q := by
simp_rw [eval_divByMonic_eq_trailingCoeff_comp] at hpq
simp_rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree, mul_comp, natTrailingDegree_mul' hpq]
variable [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_coe_units (u : R[X]ˣ) : natDegree (u : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_coe_units u)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_coe_units Polynomial.natDegree_coe_units
theorem coeff_coe_units_zero_ne_zero (u : R[X]ˣ) : coeff (u : R[X]) 0 ≠ 0 := by
conv in 0 => rw [← natDegree_coe_units u]
rw [← leadingCoeff, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
exact Units.ne_zero _
#align polynomial.coeff_coe_units_zero_ne_zero Polynomial.coeff_coe_units_zero_ne_zero
theorem degree_eq_degree_of_associated (h : Associated p q) : degree p = degree q := by
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
simp [hu.symm]
#align polynomial.degree_eq_degree_of_associated Polynomial.degree_eq_degree_of_associated
theorem degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_root (hi : Irreducible p) {x : R} (hx : IsRoot p x) :
degree p = 1 :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := dvd_iff_isRoot.2 hx
have : IsUnit (X - C x) ∨ IsUnit g := hi.isUnit_or_isUnit hg
this.elim
(fun h => by
have h₁ : degree (X - C x) = 1 := degree_X_sub_C x
have h₂ : degree (X - C x) = 0 := degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit h
rw [h₁] at h₂; exact absurd h₂ (by decide))
fun hgu => by rw [hg, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit hgu, add_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_root Polynomial.degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_root
/-- Division by a monic polynomial doesn't change the leading coefficient. -/
theorem leadingCoeff_divByMonic_of_monic {R : Type u} [CommRing R] {p q : R[X]} (hmonic : q.Monic)
(hdegree : q.degree ≤ p.degree) : (p /ₘ q).leadingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff := by
nontriviality
have h : q.leadingCoeff * (p /ₘ q).leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
simpa [divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hmonic, hmonic.leadingCoeff,
Nat.WithBot.one_le_iff_zero_lt] using hdegree
nth_rw 2 [← modByMonic_add_div p hmonic]
rw [leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt, leadingCoeff_monic_mul hmonic]
rw [degree_mul' h, degree_add_divByMonic hmonic hdegree]
exact (degree_modByMonic_lt p hmonic).trans_le hdegree
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_div_by_monic_of_monic Polynomial.leadingCoeff_divByMonic_of_monic
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/RingDivision.lean | 608 | 614 | theorem leadingCoeff_divByMonic_X_sub_C (p : R[X]) (hp : degree p ≠ 0) (a : R) :
leadingCoeff (p /ₘ (X - C a)) = leadingCoeff p := by |
nontriviality
cases' hp.lt_or_lt with hd hd
· rw [degree_eq_bot.mp <| Nat.WithBot.lt_zero_iff.mp hd, zero_divByMonic]
refine leadingCoeff_divByMonic_of_monic (monic_X_sub_C a) ?_
rwa [degree_X_sub_C, Nat.WithBot.one_le_iff_zero_lt]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e7f0ddbf65bd7181a85edb74b64bdc35ba4bdc74"
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
assert_not_exists Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
#align ideal.map Ideal.map
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
#align ideal.comap Ideal.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
#align ideal.map_mono Ideal.map_mono
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
#align ideal.mem_map_of_mem Ideal.mem_map_of_mem
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
#align ideal.apply_coe_mem_map Ideal.apply_coe_mem_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
#align ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.mem_comap Ideal.mem_comap
theorem comap_mono (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
#align ideal.comap_mono Ideal.comap_mono
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
#align ideal.comap_ne_top Ideal.comap_ne_top
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R] [rcg : RingHomClass G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : Ideal R) (hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
#align ideal.map_le_comap_of_inv_on Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inv_on
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g := fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
#align ideal.comap_le_map_of_inv_on Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inv_on
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal R) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
#align ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
#align ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
#align ideal.is_prime.comap Ideal.IsPrime.comap
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
#align ideal.map_top Ideal.map_top
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
#align ideal.gc_map_comap Ideal.gc_map_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
#align ideal.comap_id Ideal.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
#align ideal.map_id Ideal.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align ideal.comap_comap Ideal.comap_comap
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
#align ideal.map_map Ideal.map_map
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
#align ideal.map_span Ideal.map_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
#align ideal.map_le_of_le_comap Ideal.map_le_of_le_comap
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
#align ideal.le_comap_of_map_le Ideal.le_comap_of_map_le
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align ideal.le_comap_map Ideal.le_comap_map
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align ideal.map_comap_le Ideal.map_comap_le
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
#align ideal.comap_top Ideal.comap_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
#align ideal.comap_eq_top_iff Ideal.comap_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align ideal.map_bot Ideal.map_bot
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
#align ideal.map_comap_map Ideal.map_comap_map
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
#align ideal.comap_map_comap Ideal.comap_map_comap
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
#align ideal.map_sup Ideal.map_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
#align ideal.comap_inf Ideal.comap_inf
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
#align ideal.map_supr Ideal.map_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
#align ideal.comap_infi Ideal.comap_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
#align ideal.map_Sup Ideal.map_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
#align ideal.comap_Inf Ideal.comap_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
#align ideal.comap_Inf' Ideal.comap_sInf'
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
⟨comap_ne_top f H.ne_top, fun {x y} h => H.mem_or_mem <| by rwa [mem_comap, map_mul] at h⟩
#align ideal.comap_is_prime Ideal.comap_isPrime
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
#align ideal.map_inf_le Ideal.map_inf_le
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
#align ideal.le_comap_sup Ideal.le_comap_sup
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact (_root_.map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _)
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
#align ideal.smul_top_eq_map Ideal.smul_top_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
#align ideal.coe_restrict_scalars Ideal.coe_restrictScalars
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I J : Ideal S) : (I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ hx =>
Submodule.mul_induction_on hx (fun _ hx _ hy => Submodule.mul_mem_mul hx hy) fun _ _ =>
Submodule.add_mem _)
(Submodule.mul_le.mpr fun _ hx _ hy => Ideal.mul_mem_mul hx hy)
#align ideal.restrict_scalars_mul Ideal.restrictScalars_mul
section Surjective
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
#align ideal.map_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_comap_of_surjective
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
#align ideal.gi_map_comap Ideal.giMapComap
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
#align ideal.map_surjective_of_surjective Ideal.map_surjective_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
#align ideal.comap_injective_of_surjective Ideal.comap_injective_of_surjective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
#align ideal.map_sup_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_sup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
#align ideal.map_supr_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_iSup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
#align ideal.map_inf_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_inf_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
#align ideal.map_infi_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_iInf_comap_of_surjective
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction H (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
#align ideal.mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective Ideal.mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
#align ideal.mem_map_iff_of_surjective Ideal.mem_map_iff_of_surjective
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
#align ideal.le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective Ideal.le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
#align ideal.map_eq_submodule_map Ideal.map_eq_submodule_map
end Surjective
section Injective
variable (hf : Function.Injective f)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 358 | 361 | theorem comap_bot_le_of_injective : comap f ⊥ ≤ I := by |
refine le_trans (fun x hx => ?_) bot_le
rw [mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx
exact Eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ Submodule.zero_mem ⊥
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Support
#align_import topology.uniform_space.compact from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"735b22f8f9ff9792cf4212d7cb051c4c994bc685"
/-!
# Compact separated uniform spaces
## Main statements
* `compactSpace_uniformity`: On a compact uniform space, the topology determines the
uniform structure, entourages are exactly the neighborhoods of the diagonal.
* `uniformSpace_of_compact_t2`: every compact T2 topological structure is induced by a uniform
structure. This uniform structure is described in the previous item.
* **Heine-Cantor** theorem: continuous functions on compact uniform spaces with values in uniform
spaces are automatically uniformly continuous. There are several variations, the main one is
`CompactSpace.uniformContinuous_of_continuous`.
## Implementation notes
The construction `uniformSpace_of_compact_t2` is not declared as an instance, as it would badly
loop.
## Tags
uniform space, uniform continuity, compact space
-/
open scoped Classical
open Uniformity Topology Filter UniformSpace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
/-!
### Uniformity on compact spaces
-/
/-- On a compact uniform space, the topology determines the uniform structure, entourages are
exactly the neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Compact.lean | 51 | 60 | theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_eq_uniformity [CompactSpace α] : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) = 𝓤 α := by |
refine nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity.antisymm ?_
have :
(𝓤 (α × α)).HasBasis (fun U => U ∈ 𝓤 α) fun U =>
(fun p : (α × α) × α × α => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), p.1.2, p.2.2)) ⁻¹' U ×ˢ U := by
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
exact (𝓤 α).basis_sets.prod_self.comap _
refine (isCompact_diagonal.nhdsSet_basis_uniformity this).ge_iff.2 fun U hU => ?_
exact mem_of_superset hU fun ⟨x, y⟩ hxy => mem_iUnion₂.2
⟨(x, x), rfl, refl_mem_uniformity hU, hxy⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
/-!
# The set lattice
This file provides usual set notation for unions and intersections, a `CompleteLattice` instance
for `Set α`, and some more set constructions.
## Main declarations
* `Set.iUnion`: **i**ndexed **union**. Union of an indexed family of sets.
* `Set.iInter`: **i**ndexed **inter**section. Intersection of an indexed family of sets.
* `Set.sInter`: **s**et **inter**section. Intersection of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `Set.sUnion`: **s**et **union**. Union of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.BooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.kernImage`: For a function `f : α → β`, `s.kernImage f` is the set of `y` such that
`f ⁻¹ y ⊆ s`.
* `Set.seq`: Union of the image of a set under a **seq**uence of functions. `seq s t` is the union
of `f '' t` over all `f ∈ s`, where `t : Set α` and `s : Set (α → β)`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
section GaloisConnection
variable {f : α → β}
protected theorem image_preimage : GaloisConnection (image f) (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
image_subset_iff
#align set.image_preimage Set.image_preimage
protected theorem preimage_kernImage : GaloisConnection (preimage f) (kernImage f) := fun _ _ =>
subset_kernImage_iff.symm
#align set.preimage_kern_image Set.preimage_kernImage
end GaloisConnection
section kernImage
variable {f : α → β}
lemma kernImage_mono : Monotone (kernImage f) :=
Set.preimage_kernImage.monotone_u
lemma kernImage_eq_compl {s : Set α} : kernImage f s = (f '' sᶜ)ᶜ :=
Set.preimage_kernImage.u_unique (Set.image_preimage.compl)
(fun t ↦ compl_compl (f ⁻¹' t) ▸ Set.preimage_compl)
lemma kernImage_compl {s : Set α} : kernImage f (sᶜ) = (f '' s)ᶜ := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, compl_compl]
lemma kernImage_empty : kernImage f ∅ = (range f)ᶜ := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, compl_empty, image_univ]
lemma kernImage_preimage_eq_iff {s : Set β} : kernImage f (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ (range f)ᶜ ⊆ s := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, ← preimage_compl, compl_eq_comm, eq_comm, image_preimage_eq_iff,
compl_subset_comm]
lemma compl_range_subset_kernImage {s : Set α} : (range f)ᶜ ⊆ kernImage f s := by
rw [← kernImage_empty]
exact kernImage_mono (empty_subset _)
lemma kernImage_union_preimage {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
kernImage f (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) = kernImage f s ∪ t := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, kernImage_eq_compl, compl_union, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage,
compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma kernImage_preimage_union {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
kernImage f (f ⁻¹' t ∪ s) = t ∪ kernImage f s := by
rw [union_comm, kernImage_union_preimage, union_comm]
end kernImage
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' j') -/
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' j') -/
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
#align set.Union_const Set.iUnion_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
#align set.Inter_const Set.iInter_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
#align set.Union_eq_const Set.iUnion_eq_const
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
#align set.Inter_eq_const Set.iInter_eq_const
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
#align set.compl_Union₂ Set.compl_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
#align set.compl_Inter Set.compl_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
#align set.compl_Inter₂ Set.compl_iInter₂
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
#align set.Union_eq_compl_Inter_compl Set.iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
#align set.Inter_eq_compl_Union_compl Set.iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
#align set.inter_Union Set.inter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
#align set.Union_inter Set.iUnion_inter
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
#align set.Union_union_distrib Set.iUnion_union_distrib
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
#align set.Inter_inter_distrib Set.iInter_inter_distrib
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
#align set.union_Union Set.union_iUnion
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
#align set.Union_union Set.iUnion_union
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
#align set.inter_Inter Set.inter_iInter
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
#align set.Inter_inter Set.iInter_inter
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_Inter Set.union_iInter
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.Inter_union Set.iInter_union
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
#align set.Union_diff Set.iUnion_diff
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
#align set.diff_Union Set.diff_iUnion
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
#align set.diff_Inter Set.diff_iInter
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
#align set.Union_inter_subset Set.iUnion_inter_subset
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_monotone Set.iUnion_inter_of_monotone
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_antitone Set.iUnion_inter_of_antitone
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_monotone Set.iInter_union_of_monotone
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_antitone Set.iInter_union_of_antitone
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
#align set.Union_Inter_subset Set.iUnion_iInter_subset
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
#align set.Union_option Set.iUnion_option
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
#align set.Inter_option Set.iInter_option
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_dite Set.iUnion_dite
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_ite Set.iUnion_ite
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_dite Set.iInter_dite
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_ite Set.iInter_ite
end
theorem image_projection_prod {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {v : ∀ i : ι, Set (α i)}
(hv : (pi univ v).Nonempty) (i : ι) :
((fun x : ∀ i : ι, α i => x i) '' ⋂ k, (fun x : ∀ j : ι, α j => x k) ⁻¹' v k) = v i := by
classical
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp [iInter_subset]
· intro y y_in
simp only [mem_image, mem_iInter, mem_preimage]
rcases hv with ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨Function.update z i y, ?_, update_same i y z⟩
rw [@forall_update_iff ι α _ z i y fun i t => t ∈ v i]
exact ⟨y_in, fun j _ => by simpa using hz j⟩
#align set.image_projection_prod Set.image_projection_prod
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
#align set.Inter_false Set.iInter_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
#align set.Union_false Set.iUnion_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
#align set.Inter_true Set.iInter_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
#align set.Union_true Set.iUnion_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
#align set.Inter_exists Set.iInter_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_exists Set.iUnion_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
#align set.Union_empty Set.iUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
#align set.Inter_univ Set.iInter_univ
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
#align set.Union_eq_empty Set.iUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
#align set.Inter_eq_univ Set.iInter_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_Union Set.nonempty_iUnion
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
#align set.nonempty_bUnion Set.nonempty_biUnion
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_nonempty_index Set.iUnion_nonempty_index
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_right Set.iInter_iInter_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align set.Union_Union_eq_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
#align set.Union_Union_eq_right Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
#align set.Inter_or Set.iInter_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
#align set.Union_or Set.iUnion_or
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (hp hq) -/
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
#align set.Union_and Set.iUnion_and
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (hp hq) -/
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
#align set.Inter_and Set.iInter_and
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i i') -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' i) -/
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
#align set.Union_comm Set.iUnion_comm
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i i') -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' i) -/
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
#align set.Inter_comm Set.iInter_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) -/
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
#align set.Union₂_comm Set.iUnion₂_comm
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) -/
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
#align set.Inter₂_comm Set.iInter₂_comm
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
#align set.bUnion_and Set.biUnion_and
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_and' Set.biUnion_and'
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
#align set.bInter_and Set.biInter_and
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_and' Set.biInter_and'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x h) -/
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
#align set.Union_Union_eq_or_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x h) -/
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_or_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_or_left
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
#align set.mem_bUnion Set.mem_biUnion
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
#align set.mem_bInter Set.mem_biInter
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
-- Porting note: Why is this not just `subset_iUnion₂ x xs`?
@subset_iUnion₂ β α (· ∈ s) (fun i _ => u i) x xs
#align set.subset_bUnion_of_mem Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
#align set.bInter_subset_of_mem Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bInter_subset_bInter_left Set.biInter_subset_biInter_left
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
#align set.bUnion_mono Set.biUnion_mono
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
#align set.bInter_mono Set.biInter_mono
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.bUnion_eq_Union Set.biUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
#align set.bInter_eq_Inter Set.biInter_eq_iInter
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
#align set.Union_subtype Set.iUnion_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
#align set.Inter_subtype Set.iInter_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align set.bInter_empty Set.biInter_empty
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
#align set.bInter_univ Set.biInter_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
#align set.bUnion_self Set.biUnion_self
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
#align set.Union_nonempty_self Set.iUnion_nonempty_self
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
#align set.bInter_singleton Set.biInter_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
#align set.bInter_union Set.biInter_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bInter_insert Set.biInter_insert
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
#align set.bInter_pair Set.biInter_pair
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
#align set.bInter_inter Set.biInter_inter
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
#align set.inter_bInter Set.inter_biInter
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
#align set.bUnion_empty Set.biUnion_empty
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
#align set.bUnion_univ Set.biUnion_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
#align set.bUnion_singleton Set.biUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.bUnion_of_singleton Set.biUnion_of_singleton
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
#align set.bUnion_union Set.biUnion_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
#align set.Union_coe_set Set.iUnion_coe_set
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
#align set.Inter_coe_set Set.iInter_coe_set
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bUnion_insert Set.biUnion_insert
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
#align set.bUnion_pair Set.biUnion_pair
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
#align set.inter_Union₂ Set.inter_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
#align set.Union₂_inter Set.iUnion₂_inter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
#align set.union_Inter₂ Set.union_iInter₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
#align set.Inter₂_union Set.iInter₂_union
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
#align set.mem_sUnion_of_mem Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
#align set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion Set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
#align set.sInter_subset_of_mem Set.sInter_subset_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀S :=
le_sSup tS
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_mem Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_subset Set.subset_sUnion_of_subset
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
#align set.sUnion_subset Set.sUnion_subset
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
#align set.sUnion_subset_iff Set.sUnion_subset_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
#align set.subset_sInter Set.subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
#align set.subset_sInter_iff Set.subset_sInter_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀S ⊆ ⋃₀T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sUnion_subset_sUnion Set.sUnion_subset_sUnion
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sInter_subset_sInter Set.sInter_subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
#align set.sUnion_empty Set.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
#align set.sInter_empty Set.sInter_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀{s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
#align set.sUnion_singleton Set.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
#align set.sInter_singleton Set.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
#align set.sUnion_eq_empty Set.sUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
#align set.sInter_eq_univ Set.sInter_eq_univ
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnion_powerset_gi :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_sUnion Set.nonempty_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(S ∪ T) = ⋃₀S ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_union
#align set.sUnion_union Set.sUnion_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
#align set.sInter_union Set.sInter_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_insert
#align set.sUnion_insert Set.sUnion_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
#align set.sInter_insert Set.sInter_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
#align set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty Set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
#align set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ Set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀{s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
#align set.sUnion_pair Set.sUnion_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
#align set.sInter_pair Set.sInter_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀(f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sSup_image
#align set.sUnion_image Set.sUnion_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
sInf_image
#align set.sInter_image Set.sInter_image
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sUnion_range Set.sUnion_range
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sInter_range Set.sInter_range
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion_eq_univ_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union₂_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff Set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.Inter_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter_eq_empty_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
#align set.Inter₂_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter₂_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.sInter_eq_empty_iff Set.sInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_Inter Set.nonempty_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- classical
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
#align set.nonempty_Inter₂ Set.nonempty_iInter₂
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_sInter Set.nonempty_sInter
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.compl_sUnion Set.compl_sUnion
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀S), compl_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl Set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀(compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
#align set.compl_sInter Set.compl_sInter
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀(compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
#align set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl Set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
#align set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty Set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align set.range_sigma_eq_Union_range Set.range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_sigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_sigma
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_psigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_psigma
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
cases' x with i a
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
#align set.Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self Set.iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
#align set.sigma.univ Set.Sigma.univ
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
#align set.sUnion_mono Set.sUnion_mono
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
#align set.Union_subset_Union_const Set.iUnion_subset_iUnion_const
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
#align set.Union_singleton_eq_range Set.iUnion_singleton_eq_range
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_of_singleton Set.iUnion_of_singleton
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
#align set.Union_of_singleton_coe Set.iUnion_of_singleton_coe
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
#align set.sUnion_eq_bUnion Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
#align set.sInter_eq_bInter Set.sInter_eq_biInter
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sUnion_eq_Union Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sInter_eq_Inter Set.sInter_eq_iInter
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
#align set.Union_of_empty Set.iUnion_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
#align set.Inter_of_empty Set.iInter_of_empty
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
#align set.union_eq_Union Set.union_eq_iUnion
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
#align set.inter_eq_Inter Set.inter_eq_iInter
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
#align set.sInter_union_sInter Set.sInter_union_sInter
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀s ∩ ⋃₀t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
#align set.sUnion_inter_sUnion Set.sUnion_inter_sUnion
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_Union Set.biUnion_iUnion
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_Union Set.biInter_iUnion
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
#align set.sUnion_Union Set.sUnion_iUnion
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
#align set.sInter_Union Set.sInter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
cases' hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
#align set.Union_range_eq_sUnion Set.iUnion_range_eq_sUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
cases' hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
#align set.Union_range_eq_Union Set.iUnion_range_eq_iUnion
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_left Set.union_distrib_iInter_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_left Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_right Set.union_distrib_iInter_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_right Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_right
section Function
/-! ### Lemmas about `Set.MapsTo`
Porting note: some lemmas in this section were upgraded from implications to `iff`s.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, MapsTo f s t :=
sUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_sUnion Set.mapsTo_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) t :=
iUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) t :=
iUnion₂_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂
theorem mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iUnion.2 fun i ↦ (H i).mono_right (subset_iUnion t i)
#align set.maps_to_Union_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Union₂_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sInter {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂₀ T) ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, MapsTo f s t :=
forall₂_swap
#align set.maps_to_sInter Set.mapsTo_sInter
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f s (t i) :=
mapsTo_sInter.trans forall_mem_range
#align set.maps_to_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f s (t i j) := by
simp only [mapsTo_iInter]
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂
theorem mapsTo_iInter_iInter {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iInter.2 fun i => (H i).mono_left (iInter_subset s i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_iInter_iInter (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂
theorem image_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : (f '' ⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, f '' s i :=
(mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_image f (s i)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter_subset Set.image_iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iInter₂_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (f : α → β) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j :=
(mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ fun i hi => mapsTo_image f (s i hi)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter₂_subset Set.image_iInter₂_subset
theorem image_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) : f '' ⋂₀ S ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, f '' s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
apply image_iInter₂_subset
#align set.image_sInter_subset Set.image_sInter_subset
/-! ### `restrictPreimage` -/
section
open Function
variable (s : Set β) {f : α → β} {U : ι → Set β} (hU : iUnion U = univ)
theorem injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Injective f ↔ ∀ i, Injective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_injective H, fun H x y e => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show f x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
injection @H i ⟨x, hi⟩ ⟨y, show f y ∈ U i from e ▸ hi⟩ (Subtype.ext e)
#align set.injective_iff_injective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Surjective f ↔ ∀ i, Surjective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_surjective H, fun H x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
exact ⟨_, congr_arg Subtype.val (H i ⟨x, hi⟩).choose_spec⟩
#align set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Bijective f ↔ ∀ i, Bijective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
rw [Bijective, injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU,
surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU]
simp [Bijective, forall_and]
#align set.bijective_iff_bijective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
end
/-! ### `InjOn` -/
theorem InjOn.image_iInter_eq [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {f : α → β} (h : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) :
(f '' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' s i := by
inhabit ι
refine Subset.antisymm (image_iInter_subset s f) fun y hy => ?_
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_image] at hy
choose x hx hy using hy
refine ⟨x default, mem_iInter.2 fun i => ?_, hy _⟩
suffices x default = x i by
rw [this]
apply hx
replace hx : ∀ i, x i ∈ ⋃ j, s j := fun i => (subset_iUnion _ _) (hx i)
apply h (hx _) (hx _)
simp only [hy]
#align set.inj_on.image_Inter_eq Set.InjOn.image_iInter_eq
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
theorem InjOn.image_biInter_eq {p : ι → Prop} {s : ∀ i, p i → Set α} (hp : ∃ i, p i)
{f : α → β} (h : InjOn f (⋃ (i) (hi), s i hi)) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (hi), s i hi) = ⋂ (i) (hi), f '' s i hi := by
simp only [iInter, iInf_subtype']
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 hp
apply InjOn.image_iInter_eq
simpa only [iUnion, iSup_subtype'] using h
#align set.inj_on.image_bInter_eq Set.InjOn.image_biInter_eq
theorem image_iInter {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (s : ι → Set α) :
(f '' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' s i := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp_rw [iInter_of_empty, image_univ_of_surjective hf.surjective]
· exact hf.injective.injOn.image_iInter_eq
#align set.image_Inter Set.image_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iInter₂ {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iInter hf]
#align set.image_Inter₂ Set.image_iInter₂
theorem inj_on_iUnion_of_directed {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, InjOn f (s i)) : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hx with ⟨i, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hy with ⟨j, hy⟩
rcases hs i j with ⟨k, hi, hj⟩
exact hf k (hi hx) (hj hy) hxy
#align set.inj_on_Union_of_directed Set.inj_on_iUnion_of_directed
/-! ### `SurjOn` -/
theorem surjOn_sUnion {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ t ∈ T, SurjOn f s t) :
SurjOn f s (⋃₀T) := fun _ ⟨t, ht, hx⟩ => H t ht hx
#align set.surj_on_sUnion Set.surjOn_sUnion
theorem surjOn_iUnion {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, SurjOn f s (t i)) :
SurjOn f s (⋃ i, t i) :=
surjOn_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 H
#align set.surj_on_Union Set.surjOn_iUnion
theorem surjOn_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) (t i)) : SurjOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
surjOn_iUnion fun i => (H i).mono (subset_iUnion _ _) (Subset.refl _)
#align set.surj_on_Union_Union Set.surjOn_iUnion_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem surjOn_iUnion₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, SurjOn f s (t i j)) : SurjOn f s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
surjOn_iUnion fun i => surjOn_iUnion (H i)
#align set.surj_on_Union₂ Set.surjOn_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem surjOn_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, SurjOn f (s i j) (t i j)) : SurjOn f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
surjOn_iUnion_iUnion fun i => surjOn_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.surj_on_Union₂_Union₂ Set.surjOn_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
theorem surjOn_iInter [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) t) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : SurjOn f (⋂ i, s i) t := by
intro y hy
rw [Hinj.image_iInter_eq, mem_iInter]
exact fun i => H i hy
#align set.surj_on_Inter Set.surjOn_iInter
theorem surjOn_iInter_iInter [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : SurjOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
surjOn_iInter (fun i => (H i).mono (Subset.refl _) (iInter_subset _ _)) Hinj
#align set.surj_on_Inter_Inter Set.surjOn_iInter_iInter
/-! ### `BijOn` -/
theorem bijOn_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i))
(Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : BijOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
⟨mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => (H i).mapsTo, Hinj, surjOn_iUnion_iUnion fun i => (H i).surjOn⟩
#align set.bij_on_Union Set.bijOn_iUnion
theorem bijOn_iInter [hi : Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : BijOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
⟨mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => (H i).mapsTo,
hi.elim fun i => (H i).injOn.mono (iInter_subset _ _),
surjOn_iInter_iInter (fun i => (H i).surjOn) Hinj⟩
#align set.bij_on_Inter Set.bijOn_iInter
theorem bijOn_iUnion_of_directed {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) {t : ι → Set β}
{f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) : BijOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
bijOn_iUnion H <| inj_on_iUnion_of_directed hs fun i => (H i).injOn
#align set.bij_on_Union_of_directed Set.bijOn_iUnion_of_directed
theorem bijOn_iInter_of_directed [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) : BijOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
bijOn_iInter H <| inj_on_iUnion_of_directed hs fun i => (H i).injOn
#align set.bij_on_Inter_of_directed Set.bijOn_iInter_of_directed
end Function
/-! ### `image`, `preimage` -/
section Image
theorem image_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set α} : (f '' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f '' s i := by
ext1 x
simp only [mem_image, mem_iUnion, ← exists_and_right, ← exists_and_left]
-- Porting note: `exists_swap` causes a `simp` loop in Lean4 so we use `rw` instead.
rw [exists_swap]
#align set.image_Union Set.image_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iUnion₂ (f : α → β) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iUnion]
#align set.image_Union₂ Set.image_iUnion₂
theorem univ_subtype {p : α → Prop} : (univ : Set (Subtype p)) = ⋃ (x) (h : p x), {⟨x, h⟩} :=
Set.ext fun ⟨x, h⟩ => by simp [h]
#align set.univ_subtype Set.univ_subtype
theorem range_eq_iUnion {ι} (f : ι → α) : range f = ⋃ i, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [@eq_comm α a]
#align set.range_eq_Union Set.range_eq_iUnion
theorem image_eq_iUnion (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = ⋃ i ∈ s, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [@eq_comm β b]
#align set.image_eq_Union Set.image_eq_iUnion
theorem biUnion_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋃ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) :=
iSup_range
#align set.bUnion_range Set.biUnion_range
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x y) -/
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋃ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) := by simpa using biUnion_range
#align set.Union_Union_eq' Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq'
theorem biInter_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋂ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋂ y, g (f y) :=
iInf_range
#align set.bInter_range Set.biInter_range
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x y) -/
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋂ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋂ y, g (f y) := by simpa using biInter_range
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq' Set.iInter_iInter_eq'
variable {s : Set γ} {f : γ → α} {g : α → Set β}
theorem biUnion_image : ⋃ x ∈ f '' s, g x = ⋃ y ∈ s, g (f y) :=
iSup_image
#align set.bUnion_image Set.biUnion_image
theorem biInter_image : ⋂ x ∈ f '' s, g x = ⋂ y ∈ s, g (f y) :=
iInf_image
#align set.bInter_image Set.biInter_image
end Image
section Preimage
theorem monotone_preimage {f : α → β} : Monotone (preimage f) := fun _ _ h => preimage_mono h
#align set.monotone_preimage Set.monotone_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f ⁻¹' s i :=
Set.ext <| by simp [preimage]
#align set.preimage_Union Set.preimage_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem preimage_iUnion₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by simp_rw [preimage_iUnion]
#align set.preimage_Union₂ Set.preimage_iUnion₂
theorem image_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set α)} : (f '' ⋃₀ s) = ⋃₀ (image f '' s) := by
ext b
simp only [mem_image, mem_sUnion, exists_prop, sUnion_image, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, ht₁, a, ht₂, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨t, ht₁, a, ht₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} : f ⁻¹' ⋃₀s = ⋃ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, preimage_iUnion₂]
#align set.preimage_sUnion Set.preimage_sUnion
theorem preimage_iInter {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f ⁻¹' s i := by
ext; simp
#align set.preimage_Inter Set.preimage_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem preimage_iInter₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by simp_rw [preimage_iInter]
#align set.preimage_Inter₂ Set.preimage_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sInter {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} : f ⁻¹' ⋂₀ s = ⋂ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, preimage_iInter₂]
#align set.preimage_sInter Set.preimage_sInter
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : ⋃ y ∈ s, f ⁻¹' {y} = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [← preimage_iUnion₂, biUnion_of_singleton]
#align set.bUnion_preimage_singleton Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton
theorem biUnion_range_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) : ⋃ y ∈ range f, f ⁻¹' {y} = univ := by
rw [biUnion_preimage_singleton, preimage_range]
#align set.bUnion_range_preimage_singleton Set.biUnion_range_preimage_singleton
end Preimage
section Prod
theorem prod_iUnion {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} : (s ×ˢ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ×ˢ t i := by
ext
simp
#align set.prod_Union Set.prod_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem prod_iUnion₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(s ×ˢ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ×ˢ t i j := by simp_rw [prod_iUnion]
#align set.prod_Union₂ Set.prod_iUnion₂
theorem prod_sUnion {s : Set α} {C : Set (Set β)} : s ×ˢ ⋃₀C = ⋃₀((fun t => s ×ˢ t) '' C) := by
simp_rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_image, prod_iUnion₂]
#align set.prod_sUnion Set.prod_sUnion
theorem iUnion_prod_const {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} : (⋃ i, s i) ×ˢ t = ⋃ i, s i ×ˢ t := by
ext
simp
#align set.Union_prod_const Set.iUnion_prod_const
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_prod_const {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ×ˢ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ×ˢ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_prod_const]
#align set.Union₂_prod_const Set.iUnion₂_prod_const
theorem sUnion_prod_const {C : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} :
⋃₀C ×ˢ t = ⋃₀((fun s : Set α => s ×ˢ t) '' C) := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, iUnion₂_prod_const, biUnion_image]
#align set.sUnion_prod_const Set.sUnion_prod_const
theorem iUnion_prod {ι ι' α β} (s : ι → Set α) (t : ι' → Set β) :
⋃ x : ι × ι', s x.1 ×ˢ t x.2 = (⋃ i : ι, s i) ×ˢ ⋃ i : ι', t i := by
ext
simp
#align set.Union_prod Set.iUnion_prod
/-- Analogue of `iSup_prod` for sets. -/
lemma iUnion_prod' (f : β × γ → Set α) : ⋃ x : β × γ, f x = ⋃ (i : β) (j : γ), f (i, j) :=
iSup_prod
theorem iUnion_prod_of_monotone [SemilatticeSup α] {s : α → Set β} {t : α → Set γ} (hs : Monotone s)
(ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ x, s x ×ˢ t x = (⋃ x, s x) ×ˢ ⋃ x, t x := by
ext ⟨z, w⟩; simp only [mem_prod, mem_iUnion, exists_imp, and_imp, iff_def]; constructor
· intro x hz hw
exact ⟨⟨x, hz⟩, x, hw⟩
· intro x hz x' hw
exact ⟨x ⊔ x', hs le_sup_left hz, ht le_sup_right hw⟩
#align set.Union_prod_of_monotone Set.iUnion_prod_of_monotone
theorem sInter_prod_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (T : Set (Set β)) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂ r ∈ S ×ˢ T, r.1 ×ˢ r.2 :=
subset_iInter₂ fun x hx _ hy => ⟨hy.1 x.1 hx.1, hy.2 x.2 hx.2⟩
#align set.sInter_prod_sInter_subset Set.sInter_prod_sInter_subset
theorem sInter_prod_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {T : Set (Set β)} (hS : S.Nonempty) (hT : T.Nonempty) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ r ∈ S ×ˢ T, r.1 ×ˢ r.2 := by
obtain ⟨s₁, h₁⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨s₂, h₂⟩ := hT
refine Set.Subset.antisymm (sInter_prod_sInter_subset S T) fun x hx => ?_
rw [mem_iInter₂] at hx
exact ⟨fun s₀ h₀ => (hx (s₀, s₂) ⟨h₀, h₂⟩).1, fun s₀ h₀ => (hx (s₁, s₀) ⟨h₁, h₀⟩).2⟩
#align set.sInter_prod_sInter Set.sInter_prod_sInter
theorem sInter_prod {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Nonempty) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ t = ⋂ s ∈ S, s ×ˢ t := by
rw [← sInter_singleton t, sInter_prod_sInter hS (singleton_nonempty t), sInter_singleton]
simp_rw [prod_singleton, mem_image, iInter_exists, biInter_and', iInter_iInter_eq_right]
#align set.sInter_prod Set.sInter_prod
theorem prod_sInter {T : Set (Set β)} (hT : T.Nonempty) (s : Set α) :
s ×ˢ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ t ∈ T, s ×ˢ t := by
rw [← sInter_singleton s, sInter_prod_sInter (singleton_nonempty s) hT, sInter_singleton]
simp_rw [singleton_prod, mem_image, iInter_exists, biInter_and', iInter_iInter_eq_right]
#align set.prod_sInter Set.prod_sInter
theorem prod_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} [hι : Nonempty ι] :
(s ×ˢ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ×ˢ t i := by
ext x
simp only [mem_prod, mem_iInter]
exact ⟨fun h i => ⟨h.1, h.2 i⟩, fun h => ⟨(h hι.some).1, fun i => (h i).2⟩⟩
#align prod_Inter Set.prod_iInter
end Prod
section Image2
variable (f : α → β → γ) {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
/-- The `Set.image2` version of `Set.image_eq_iUnion` -/
theorem image2_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = ⋃ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t), {f i j} := by
ext; simp [eq_comm]
#align set.image2_eq_Union Set.image2_eq_iUnion
theorem iUnion_image_left : ⋃ a ∈ s, f a '' t = image2 f s t := by
simp only [image2_eq_iUnion, image_eq_iUnion]
#align set.Union_image_left Set.iUnion_image_left
theorem iUnion_image_right : ⋃ b ∈ t, (f · b) '' s = image2 f s t := by
rw [image2_swap, iUnion_image_left]
#align set.Union_image_right Set.iUnion_image_right
theorem image2_iUnion_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋃ i, s i) t = ⋃ i, image2 f (s i) t := by
simp only [← image_prod, iUnion_prod_const, image_iUnion]
#align set.image2_Union_left Set.image2_iUnion_left
theorem image2_iUnion_right (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, image2 f s (t i) := by
simp only [← image_prod, prod_iUnion, image_iUnion]
#align set.image2_Union_right Set.image2_iUnion_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iUnion₂_left (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t = ⋃ (i) (j), image2 f (s i j) t := by simp_rw [image2_iUnion_left]
#align set.image2_Union₂_left Set.image2_iUnion₂_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iUnion₂_right (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), image2 f s (t i j) := by
simp_rw [image2_iUnion_right]
#align set.image2_Union₂_right Set.image2_iUnion₂_right
theorem image2_iInter_subset_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋂ i, s i) t ⊆ ⋂ i, image2 f (s i) t := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i => mem_image2_of_mem (hx _) hy
#align set.image2_Inter_subset_left Set.image2_iInter_subset_left
theorem image2_iInter_subset_right (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, image2 f s (t i) := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i => mem_image2_of_mem hx (hy _)
#align set.image2_Inter_subset_right Set.image2_iInter_subset_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iInter₂_subset_left (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) t ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), image2 f (s i j) t := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i j => mem_image2_of_mem (hx _ _) hy
#align set.image2_Inter₂_subset_left Set.image2_iInter₂_subset_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iInter₂_subset_right (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), image2 f s (t i j) := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i j => mem_image2_of_mem hx (hy _ _)
#align set.image2_Inter₂_subset_right Set.image2_iInter₂_subset_right
theorem prod_eq_biUnion_left : s ×ˢ t = ⋃ a ∈ s, (fun b => (a, b)) '' t := by
rw [iUnion_image_left, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_bUnion_left Set.prod_eq_biUnion_left
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,922 | 1,923 | theorem prod_eq_biUnion_right : s ×ˢ t = ⋃ b ∈ t, (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by |
rw [iUnion_image_right, image2_mk_eq_prod]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
#align_import algebra.order.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"afdb43429311b885a7988ea15d0bac2aac80f69c"
/-!
# Floor and ceil
## Summary
We define the natural- and integer-valued floor and ceil functions on linearly ordered rings.
## Main Definitions
* `FloorSemiring`: An ordered semiring with natural-valued floor and ceil.
* `Nat.floor a`: Greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. Equal to `0` if `a < 0`.
* `Nat.ceil a`: Least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n`.
* `FloorRing`: A linearly ordered ring with integer-valued floor and ceil.
* `Int.floor a`: Greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`.
* `Int.ceil a`: Least integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`.
* `Int.fract a`: Fractional part of `a`, defined as `a - floor a`.
* `round a`: Nearest integer to `a`. It rounds halves towards infinity.
## Notations
* `⌊a⌋₊` is `Nat.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉₊` is `Nat.ceil a`.
* `⌊a⌋` is `Int.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉` is `Int.ceil a`.
The index `₊` in the notations for `Nat.floor` and `Nat.ceil` is used in analogy to the notation
for `nnnorm`.
## TODO
`LinearOrderedRing`/`LinearOrderedSemiring` can be relaxed to `OrderedRing`/`OrderedSemiring` in
many lemmas.
## Tags
rounding, floor, ceil
-/
open Set
variable {F α β : Type*}
/-! ### Floor semiring -/
/-- A `FloorSemiring` is an ordered semiring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℕ` satisfying `∀ (n : ℕ) (x : α), n ≤ ⌊x⌋ ↔ (n : α) ≤ x)`.
Note that many lemmas require a `LinearOrder`. Please see the above `TODO`. -/
class FloorSemiring (α) [OrderedSemiring α] where
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor a` computes the greatest natural `n` such that `(n : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil a` computes the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ (n : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor` of a negative element is zero. -/
floor_of_neg {a : α} (ha : a < 0) : floor a = 0
/-- A natural number `n` is smaller than `FloorSemiring.floor a` iff its coercion to `α` is
smaller than `a`. -/
gc_floor {a : α} {n : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ floor a ↔ (n : α) ≤ a
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℕ → α`. -/
gc_ceil : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_semiring FloorSemiring
instance : FloorSemiring ℕ where
floor := id
ceil := id
floor_of_neg ha := (Nat.not_lt_zero _ ha).elim
gc_floor _ := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil n a := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
namespace Nat
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
/-- `⌊a⌋₊` is the greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. If `a` is negative, then `⌊a⌋₊ = 0`. -/
def floor : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.floor
#align nat.floor Nat.floor
/-- `⌈a⌉₊` is the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n` -/
def ceil : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.ceil
#align nat.ceil Nat.ceil
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat : (Nat.floor : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.floor_nat Nat.floor_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_nat : (Nat.ceil : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.ceil_nat Nat.ceil_nat
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋₊" => Nat.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉₊" => Nat.ceil a
end OrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
theorem le_floor_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a :=
FloorSemiring.gc_floor ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff Nat.le_floor_iff
theorem le_floor (h : (n : α) ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ :=
(le_floor_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h).2 h
#align nat.le_floor Nat.le_floor
theorem floor_lt (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.floor_lt Nat.floor_lt
theorem floor_lt_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
(floor_lt ha).trans <| by rw [Nat.cast_one]
#align nat.floor_lt_one Nat.floor_lt_one
theorem lt_of_floor_lt (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < n) : a < n :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' => (le_floor h').not_lt h
#align nat.lt_of_floor_lt Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
theorem lt_one_of_floor_lt_one (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1) : a < 1 := mod_cast lt_of_floor_lt h
#align nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one Nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one
theorem floor_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : α) ≤ a :=
(le_floor_iff ha).1 le_rfl
#align nat.floor_le Nat.floor_le
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊.succ :=
lt_of_floor_lt <| Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align nat.lt_succ_floor Nat.lt_succ_floor
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by simpa using lt_succ_floor a
#align nat.lt_floor_add_one Nat.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor_iff, Nat.cast_le]
exact n.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_coe Nat.floor_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-08")] alias floor_coe := floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_zero Nat.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_one Nat.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
Nat.floor_natCast _
theorem floor_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 :=
ha.lt_or_eq.elim FloorSemiring.floor_of_neg <| by
rintro rfl
exact floor_zero
#align nat.floor_of_nonpos Nat.floor_of_nonpos
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℕ) := fun a b h => by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact le_floor ((floor_le ha).trans h)
#align nat.floor_mono Nat.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋₊ ≤ ⌊y⌋₊ := floor_mono
theorem le_floor_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact
iff_of_false (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn).not_le
(not_le_of_lt <| ha.trans_lt <| cast_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
· exact le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff' Nat.le_floor_iff'
@[simp]
theorem one_le_floor_iff (x : α) : 1 ≤ ⌊x⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
mod_cast @le_floor_iff' α _ _ x 1 one_ne_zero
#align nat.one_le_floor_iff Nat.one_le_floor_iff
theorem floor_lt' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff' hn
#align nat.floor_lt' Nat.floor_lt'
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero`
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero, cast_one]
#align nat.floor_pos Nat.floor_pos
theorem pos_of_floor_pos (h : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊) : 0 < a :=
(le_or_lt a 0).resolve_left fun ha => lt_irrefl 0 <| by rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha] at h
#align nat.pos_of_floor_pos Nat.pos_of_floor_pos
theorem lt_of_lt_floor (h : n < ⌊a⌋₊) : ↑n < a :=
(Nat.cast_lt.2 h).trans_le <| floor_le (pos_of_floor_pos <| (Nat.zero_le n).trans_lt h).le
#align nat.lt_of_lt_floor Nat.lt_of_lt_floor
theorem floor_le_of_le (h : a ≤ n) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ n :=
le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.2 lt_of_lt_floor h
#align nat.floor_le_of_le Nat.floor_le_of_le
theorem floor_le_one_of_le_one (h : a ≤ 1) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ 1 :=
floor_le_of_le <| h.trans_eq <| Nat.cast_one.symm
#align nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one Nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← lt_one_iff, ← @cast_one α]
exact floor_lt' Nat.one_ne_zero
#align nat.floor_eq_zero Nat.floor_eq_zero
theorem floor_eq_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff ha, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt ha, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff Nat.floor_eq_iff
theorem floor_eq_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff' hn, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt' (Nat.add_one_ne_zero n),
Nat.lt_add_one_iff, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff' Nat.floor_eq_iff'
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℕ) : ∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), ⌊a⌋₊ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
(floor_eq_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h₀).mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℕ) :
∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), (⌊a⌋₊ : α) = n :=
fun x hx => mod_cast floor_eq_on_Ico n x hx
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico' Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico'
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_zero : (floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iio 1 :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_floor_zero Nat.preimage_floor_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(n:α)`
theorem preimage_floor_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ico (n:α) (n + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff' hn
#align nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection (ceil : α → ℕ) (↑) :=
FloorSemiring.gc_ceil
#align nat.gc_ceil_coe Nat.gc_ceil_coe
@[simp]
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n :=
gc_ceil_coe _ _
#align nat.ceil_le Nat.ceil_le
theorem lt_ceil : n < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align nat.lt_ceil Nat.lt_ceil
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : n + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a := by
rw [← Nat.lt_ceil, Nat.add_one_le_iff]
#align nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add 1, Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.one_le_ceil_iff Nat.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one Nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ :=
ceil_le.1 le_rfl
#align nat.le_ceil Nat.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α] (z : ℤ) :
⌈(z : α)⌉₊ = z.toNat :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
simp only [ceil_le, Int.toNat_le]
norm_cast
#align nat.ceil_int_cast Nat.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, cast_le]
#align nat.ceil_nat_cast Nat.ceil_natCast
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℕ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align nat.ceil_mono Nat.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉₊ ≤ ⌈y⌉₊ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_zero Nat.ceil_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_one : ⌈(1 : α)⌉₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_one Nat.ceil_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌉₊ = n := ceil_natCast n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_zero : ⌈a⌉₊ = 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by rw [← Nat.le_zero, ceil_le, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_eq_zero Nat.ceil_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_pos Nat.ceil_pos
theorem lt_of_ceil_lt (h : ⌈a⌉₊ < n) : a < n :=
(le_ceil a).trans_lt (Nat.cast_lt.2 h)
#align nat.lt_of_ceil_lt Nat.lt_of_ceil_lt
theorem le_of_ceil_le (h : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n) : a ≤ n :=
(le_ceil a).trans (Nat.cast_le.2 h)
#align nat.le_of_ceil_le Nat.le_of_ceil_le
theorem floor_le_ceil (a : α) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact cast_le.1 ((floor_le ha).trans <| le_ceil _)
#align nat.floor_le_ceil Nat.floor_le_ceil
theorem floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos {a b : α} (h : a < b) (h' : 0 < b) : ⌊a⌋₊ < ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 a with (ha | ha)
· rw [floor_lt ha]
exact h.trans_le (le_ceil _)
· rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha.le, lt_ceil, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos Nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos
theorem ceil_eq_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌈a⌉₊ = n ↔ ↑(n - 1) < a ∧ a ≤ n := by
rw [← ceil_le, ← not_le, ← ceil_le, not_le,
tsub_lt_iff_right (Nat.add_one_le_iff.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hn)), Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.ceil_eq_iff Nat.ceil_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ceil_zero : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iic 0 :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_ceil_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(↑(n - 1))`
theorem preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ioc (↑(n - 1) : α) n :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_iff hn
#align nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Intervals -/
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioo a b = Set.Ioo ⌊a⌋₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioo Nat.preimage_Ioo
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico {a b : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ico a b = Set.Ico ⌈a⌉₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Ico Nat.preimage_Ico
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioc a b = Set.Ioc ⌊a⌋₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, le_floor_iff, hb, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioc Nat.preimage_Ioc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc {a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Icc a b = Set.Icc ⌈a⌉₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, hb, le_floor_iff]
#align nat.preimage_Icc Nat.preimage_Icc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioi a = Set.Ioi ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioi Nat.preimage_Ioi
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ici a = Set.Ici ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le]
#align nat.preimage_Ici Nat.preimage_Ici
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iio a = Set.Iio ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Iio Nat.preimage_Iio
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iic a = Set.Iic ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [le_floor_iff, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Iic Nat.preimage_Iic
theorem floor_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by
rw [le_floor_iff (add_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg)]
obtain hb | hb := le_total n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_le_add_iff_right, add_le_add_iff_right,
le_floor_iff ha]
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_left_comm _ b, add_left_comm _ (b : α)]
refine iff_of_true ?_ le_self_add
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right <| ha.trans <| le_add_of_nonneg_right d.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_add_nat Nat.floor_add_nat
theorem floor_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a + 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_nat ha 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.floor_add_one Nat.floor_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat ha n
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
⌊a - n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - n := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha, floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le (ha.trans n.cast_nonneg)), zero_tsub]
rcases le_total a n with h | h
· rw [floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le h), eq_comm, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le]
exact Nat.cast_le.1 ((Nat.floor_le ha).trans h)
· rw [eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le (le_floor h), ← floor_add_nat _, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_left ((add_zero _).trans_le h)
#align nat.floor_sub_nat Nat.floor_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_one [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - 1 :=
mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by
rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, not_iff_not, lt_ceil]
obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_lt_add_iff_right, add_lt_add_iff_right,
lt_ceil]
· exact iff_of_true (lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt ha <| cast_lt.2 hb) (Nat.lt_add_left _ hb)
#align nat.ceil_add_nat Nat.ceil_add_nat
theorem ceil_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌈a + 1⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_nat ha 1`
rw [cast_one.symm, ceil_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.ceil_add_one Nat.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat ha n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : α) < a + 1 :=
lt_ceil.1 <| (Nat.lt_succ_self _).trans_le (ceil_add_one ha).ge
#align nat.ceil_lt_add_one Nat.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ + ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add]
exact _root_.add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align nat.ceil_add_le Nat.ceil_add_le
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋₊ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| lt_floor_add_one a
#align nat.sub_one_lt_floor Nat.sub_one_lt_floor
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [LinearOrderedSemifield α] [FloorSemiring α]
-- TODO: should these lemmas be `simp`? `norm_cast`?
theorem floor_div_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a / n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / n := by
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha
· rw [floor_of_nonpos, floor_of_nonpos ha]
· simp
apply div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· rw [cast_zero, div_zero, Nat.div_zero, floor_zero]
refine (floor_eq_iff ?_).2 ?_
· exact div_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
constructor
· exact cast_div_le.trans (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (floor_le ha) n.cast_nonneg)
rw [div_lt_iff, add_mul, one_mul, ← cast_mul, ← cast_add, ← floor_lt ha]
· exact lt_div_mul_add hn
· exact cast_pos.2 hn
#align nat.floor_div_nat Nat.floor_div_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_div_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a / (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_div_nat a n
/-- Natural division is the floor of field division. -/
theorem floor_div_eq_div (m n : ℕ) : ⌊(m : α) / n⌋₊ = m / n := by
convert floor_div_nat (m : α) n
rw [m.floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_div_eq_div Nat.floor_div_eq_div
end LinearOrderedSemifield
end Nat
/-- There exists at most one `FloorSemiring` structure on a linear ordered semiring. -/
theorem subsingleton_floorSemiring {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] :
Subsingleton (FloorSemiring α) := by
refine ⟨fun H₁ H₂ => ?_⟩
have : H₁.ceil = H₂.ceil := funext fun a => (H₁.gc_ceil.l_unique H₂.gc_ceil) fun n => rfl
have : H₁.floor = H₂.floor := by
ext a
cases' lt_or_le a 0 with h h
· rw [H₁.floor_of_neg, H₂.floor_of_neg] <;> exact h
· refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun n => ?_
rw [H₁.gc_floor, H₂.gc_floor] <;> exact h
cases H₁
cases H₂
congr
#align subsingleton_floor_semiring subsingleton_floorSemiring
/-! ### Floor rings -/
/-- A `FloorRing` is a linear ordered ring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℤ` satisfying `∀ (z : ℤ) (a : α), z ≤ floor a ↔ (z : α) ≤ a)`.
-/
class FloorRing (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] where
/-- `FloorRing.floor a` computes the greatest integer `z` such that `(z : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil a` computes the least integer `z` such that `a ≤ (z : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the upper adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_ring FloorRing
instance : FloorRing ℤ where
floor := id
ceil := id
gc_coe_floor a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil_coe a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `floor` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofFloor (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (floor : α → ℤ)
(gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor
ceil := fun a => -floor (-a)
gc_coe_floor
gc_ceil_coe := fun a z => by rw [neg_le, ← gc_coe_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff] }
#align floor_ring.of_floor FloorRing.ofFloor
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `ceil` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofCeil (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (ceil : α → ℤ)
(gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor := fun a => -ceil (-a)
ceil
gc_coe_floor := fun a z => by rw [le_neg, gc_ceil_coe, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
gc_ceil_coe }
#align floor_ring.of_ceil FloorRing.ofCeil
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α] {z : ℤ} {a : α}
/-- `Int.floor a` is the greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`. It is denoted with `⌊a⌋`. -/
def floor : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.floor
#align int.floor Int.floor
/-- `Int.ceil a` is the smallest integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`. It is denoted with `⌈a⌉`. -/
def ceil : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.ceil
#align int.ceil Int.ceil
/-- `Int.fract a`, the fractional part of `a`, is `a` minus its floor. -/
def fract (a : α) : α :=
a - floor a
#align int.fract Int.fract
@[simp]
theorem floor_int : (Int.floor : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.floor_int Int.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_int : (Int.ceil : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_int Int.ceil_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_int : (Int.fract : ℤ → ℤ) = 0 :=
funext fun x => by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_int Int.fract_int
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋" => Int.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉" => Int.ceil a
-- Mathematical notation for `fract a` is usually `{a}`. Let's not even go there.
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_floor_eq : @FloorRing.floor = @Int.floor :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_floor_eq Int.floorRing_floor_eq
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_ceil_eq : @FloorRing.ceil = @Int.ceil :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_ceil_eq Int.floorRing_ceil_eq
/-! #### Floor -/
theorem gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection ((↑) : ℤ → α) floor :=
FloorRing.gc_coe_floor
#align int.gc_coe_floor Int.gc_coe_floor
theorem le_floor : z ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ (z : α) ≤ a :=
(gc_coe_floor z a).symm
#align int.le_floor Int.le_floor
theorem floor_lt : ⌊a⌋ < z ↔ a < z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_floor
#align int.floor_lt Int.floor_lt
theorem floor_le (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a :=
gc_coe_floor.l_u_le a
#align int.floor_le Int.floor_le
theorem floor_nonneg : 0 ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ 0 ≤ a := by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_zero]
#align int.floor_nonneg Int.floor_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_sub_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ z - 1 ↔ a < z := by rw [← floor_lt, le_sub_one_iff]
#align int.floor_le_sub_one_iff Int.floor_le_sub_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_neg_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
rw [← zero_sub (1 : ℤ), floor_le_sub_one_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.floor_le_neg_one_iff Int.floor_le_neg_one_iff
theorem floor_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ 0 := by
rw [← @cast_le α, Int.cast_zero]
exact (floor_le a).trans ha
#align int.floor_nonpos Int.floor_nonpos
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋.succ :=
floor_lt.1 <| Int.lt_succ_self _
#align int.lt_succ_floor Int.lt_succ_floor
@[simp]
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
simpa only [Int.succ, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one] using lt_succ_floor a
#align int.lt_floor_add_one Int.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (lt_floor_add_one a)
#align int.sub_one_lt_floor Int.sub_one_lt_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌊(z : α)⌋ = z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_le]
#align int.floor_int_cast Int.floor_intCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.floor_nat_cast Int.floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_zero Int.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_one Int.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌋ = n :=
floor_natCast n
@[mono]
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℤ) :=
gc_coe_floor.monotone_u
#align int.floor_mono Int.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋ ≤ ⌊y⌋ := floor_mono
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor`
rw [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor, cast_one]
#align int.floor_pos Int.floor_pos
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a + z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub]
#align int.floor_add_int Int.floor_add_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌊a + 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_int a 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_one Int.floor_add_one
theorem le_floor_add (a b : α) : ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ ≤ ⌊a + b⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (floor_le _) (floor_le _)
#align int.le_floor_add Int.le_floor_add
theorem le_floor_add_floor (a b : α) : ⌊a + b⌋ - 1 ≤ ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ := by
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub, sub_le_comm, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
refine le_trans ?_ (sub_one_lt_floor _).le
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', ← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
exact floor_le _
#align int.le_floor_add_floor Int.le_floor_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_int_add (z : ℤ) (a : α) : ⌊↑z + a⌋ = z + ⌊a⌋ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using floor_add_int a z
#align int.floor_int_add Int.floor_int_add
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_nat Int.floor_add_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ⌊↑n + a⌋ = n + ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_int_add]
#align int.floor_nat_add Int.floor_nat_add
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a⌋ = OfNat.ofNat n + ⌊a⌋ :=
floor_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a - z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (floor_add_int _ _)
#align int.floor_sub_int Int.floor_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a - n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_sub_int]
#align int.floor_sub_nat Int.floor_sub_nat
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_one (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - 1 := mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing α] [FloorRing α]
{a b : α} (h : ⌊a⌋ = ⌊b⌋) : |a - b| < 1 := by
have : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one a
have : b < ⌊b⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one b
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) = ⌊b⌋ := Int.cast_inj.2 h
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a := floor_le a
have : (⌊b⌋ : α) ≤ b := floor_le b
exact abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor Int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor
theorem floor_eq_iff : ⌊a⌋ = z ↔ ↑z ≤ a ∧ a < z + 1 := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, le_floor, ← Int.lt_add_one_iff, floor_lt, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
and_comm]
#align int.floor_eq_iff Int.floor_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero_iff : ⌊a⌋ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ico (0 : α) 1 := by simp [floor_eq_iff]
#align int.floor_eq_zero_iff Int.floor_eq_zero_iff
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), ⌊a⌋ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
floor_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico Int.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), (⌊a⌋ : α) = n := fun a ha =>
congr_arg _ <| floor_eq_on_Ico n a ha
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico' Int.floor_eq_on_Ico'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_singleton (m : ℤ) : (floor : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ico (m : α) (m + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_floor_singleton Int.preimage_floor_singleton
/-! #### Fractional part -/
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_floor (a : α) : a - ⌊a⌋ = fract a :=
rfl
#align int.self_sub_floor Int.self_sub_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_fract (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) + fract a = a :=
add_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.floor_add_fract Int.floor_add_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_floor (a : α) : fract a + ⌊a⌋ = a :=
sub_add_cancel _ _
#align int.fract_add_floor Int.fract_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_int Int.fract_add_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_nat (a : α) (m : ℕ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_nat Int.fract_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_one (a : α) : fract (a + 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_add_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem fract_int_add (m : ℤ) (a : α) : fract (↑m + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_int]
#align int.fract_int_add Int.fract_int_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : fract (↑n + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_one_add (a : α) : fract (1 + a) = fract a := mod_cast fract_nat_add 1 a
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a) = fract a :=
fract_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a - m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_int Int.fract_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : fract (a - n) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_nat Int.fract_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_one (a : α) : fract (a - 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_sub_nat a n
-- Was a duplicate lemma under a bad name
#align int.fract_int_nat Int.fract_int_add
theorem fract_add_le (a b : α) : fract (a + b) ≤ fract a + fract b := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_le_sub_iff_left, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_le]
exact le_floor_add _ _
#align int.fract_add_le Int.fract_add_le
theorem fract_add_fract_le (a b : α) : fract a + fract b ≤ fract (a + b) + 1 := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact mod_cast le_floor_add_floor a b
#align int.fract_add_fract_le Int.fract_add_fract_le
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_fract (a : α) : a - fract a = ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.self_sub_fract Int.self_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_self (a : α) : fract a - a = -⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel_left _ _
#align int.fract_sub_self Int.fract_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ fract a :=
sub_nonneg.2 <| floor_le _
#align int.fract_nonneg Int.fract_nonneg
/-- The fractional part of `a` is positive if and only if `a ≠ ⌊a⌋`. -/
lemma fract_pos : 0 < fract a ↔ a ≠ ⌊a⌋ :=
(fract_nonneg a).lt_iff_ne.trans <| ne_comm.trans sub_ne_zero
#align int.fract_pos Int.fract_pos
theorem fract_lt_one (a : α) : fract a < 1 :=
sub_lt_comm.1 <| sub_one_lt_floor _
#align int.fract_lt_one Int.fract_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem fract_zero : fract (0 : α) = 0 := by rw [fract, floor_zero, cast_zero, sub_self]
#align int.fract_zero Int.fract_zero
@[simp]
theorem fract_one : fract (1 : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_one Int.fract_one
theorem abs_fract : |fract a| = fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| fract_nonneg a
#align int.abs_fract Int.abs_fract
@[simp]
theorem abs_one_sub_fract : |1 - fract a| = 1 - fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| sub_nonneg.mpr (fract_lt_one a).le
#align int.abs_one_sub_fract Int.abs_one_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_intCast (z : ℤ) : fract (z : α) = 0 := by
unfold fract
rw [floor_intCast]
exact sub_self _
#align int.fract_int_cast Int.fract_intCast
@[simp]
theorem fract_natCast (n : ℕ) : fract (n : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_nat_cast Int.fract_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) : α) = 0 :=
fract_natCast n
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem fract_floor (a : α) : fract (⌊a⌋ : α) = 0 :=
fract_intCast _
#align int.fract_floor Int.fract_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_fract (a : α) : ⌊fract a⌋ = 0 := by
rw [floor_eq_iff, Int.cast_zero, zero_add]; exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.floor_fract Int.floor_fract
theorem fract_eq_iff {a b : α} : fract a = b ↔ 0 ≤ b ∧ b < 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, ⟨⌊a⌋, sub_sub_cancel _ _⟩⟩,
by
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, z, hz⟩
rw [← self_sub_floor, eq_comm, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_comm, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, hz,
Int.cast_inj, floor_eq_iff, ← hz]
constructor <;> simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc] ⟩
#align int.fract_eq_iff Int.fract_eq_iff
theorem fract_eq_fract {a b : α} : fract a = fract b ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => ⟨⌊a⌋ - ⌊b⌋, by unfold fract at h; rw [Int.cast_sub, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub.1 h]⟩,
by
rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
refine fract_eq_iff.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, z + ⌊b⌋, ?_⟩
rw [eq_add_of_sub_eq hz, add_comm, Int.cast_add]
exact add_sub_sub_cancel _ _ _⟩
#align int.fract_eq_fract Int.fract_eq_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_eq_self {a : α} : fract a = a ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ a < 1 :=
fract_eq_iff.trans <| and_assoc.symm.trans <| and_iff_left ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align int.fract_eq_self Int.fract_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (a : α) : fract (fract a) = fract a :=
fract_eq_self.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.fract_fract Int.fract_fract
theorem fract_add (a b : α) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract (a + b) - fract a - fract b = z :=
⟨⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ - ⌊a + b⌋, by
unfold fract
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, cast_add, cast_neg]
abel⟩
#align int.fract_add Int.fract_add
theorem fract_neg {x : α} (hx : fract x ≠ 0) : fract (-x) = 1 - fract x := by
rw [fract_eq_iff]
constructor
· rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, zero_add]
exact (fract_lt_one x).le
refine ⟨sub_lt_self _ (lt_of_le_of_ne' (fract_nonneg x) hx), -⌊x⌋ - 1, ?_⟩
simp only [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, cast_sub, cast_neg, cast_one, sub_left_inj]
conv in -x => rw [← floor_add_fract x]
simp [-floor_add_fract]
#align int.fract_neg Int.fract_neg
@[simp]
theorem fract_neg_eq_zero {x : α} : fract (-x) = 0 ↔ fract x = 0 := by
simp only [fract_eq_iff, le_refl, zero_lt_one, tsub_zero, true_and_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ <;> use -z <;> simp [← hz]
#align int.fract_neg_eq_zero Int.fract_neg_eq_zero
theorem fract_mul_nat (a : α) (b : ℕ) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract a * b - fract (a * b) = z := by
induction' b with c hc
· use 0; simp
· rcases hc with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, mul_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
rcases fract_add (a * c) a with ⟨y, hy⟩
use z - y
rw [Int.cast_sub, ← hz, ← hy]
abel
#align int.fract_mul_nat Int.fract_mul_nat
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
theorem preimage_fract (s : Set α) :
fract ⁻¹' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x => x - (m:α)) ⁻¹' (s ∩ Ico (0 : α) 1) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⌊x⌋, h, fract_nonneg x, fract_lt_one x⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨m, hms, hm0, hm1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊x⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 hm0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 hm1⟩
exact hms
#align int.preimage_fract Int.preimage_fract
theorem image_fract (s : Set α) : fract '' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x : α => x - m) '' s ∩ Ico 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_image, mem_inter_iff, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⌊y⌋, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, fract_nonneg y, fract_lt_one y⟩
· rintro ⟨m, ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩, h0, h1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊y⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 h0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 h1⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩
#align int.image_fract Int.image_fract
section LinearOrderedField
variable {k : Type*} [LinearOrderedField k] [FloorRing k] {b : k}
theorem fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico (a b : k) (ha : 0 < a) : fract (b / a) * a ∈ Ico 0 a :=
⟨(mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right ha).2 (fract_nonneg (b / a)),
(mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left ha).2 (fract_lt_one (b / a))⟩
#align int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico Int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico
theorem fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq (a b : k) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
fract (b / a) * a + ⌊b / a⌋ • a = b := by
rw [zsmul_eq_mul, ← add_mul, fract_add_floor, div_mul_cancel₀ b ha]
#align int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq Int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq
theorem sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg (a : k) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a - ⌊a / b⌋ * b :=
sub_nonneg_of_le <| (le_div_iff hb).1 <| floor_le _
#align int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg
theorem sub_floor_div_mul_lt (a : k) (hb : 0 < b) : a - ⌊a / b⌋ * b < b :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| by
-- Porting note: `← one_add_mul` worked in mathlib3 without the argument
rw [← one_add_mul _ b, ← div_lt_iff hb, add_comm]
exact lt_floor_add_one _
#align int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt
theorem fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod {m n : ℕ} : fract ((m : k) / n) = ↑(m % n) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
have hn' : 0 < (n : k) := by
norm_cast
refine fract_eq_iff.mpr ⟨?_, ?_, m / n, ?_⟩
· positivity
· simpa only [div_lt_one hn', Nat.cast_lt] using m.mod_lt hn
· rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← mul_right_inj' hn'.ne', mul_div_cancel₀ _ hn'.ne', mul_add,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ hn'.ne']
norm_cast
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Nat.mod_add_div m n]
#align int.fract_div_nat_cast_eq_div_nat_cast_mod Int.fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod
-- TODO Generalise this to allow `n : ℤ` using `Int.fmod` instead of `Int.mod`.
theorem fract_div_intCast_eq_div_intCast_mod {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} :
fract ((m : k) / n) = ↑(m % n) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
replace hn : 0 < (n : k) := by norm_cast
have : ∀ {l : ℤ}, 0 ≤ l → fract ((l : k) / n) = ↑(l % n) / n := by
intros l hl
obtain ⟨l₀, rfl | rfl⟩ := l.eq_nat_or_neg
· rw [cast_natCast, ← natCast_mod, cast_natCast, fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod]
· rw [Right.nonneg_neg_iff, natCast_nonpos_iff] at hl
simp [hl, zero_mod]
obtain ⟨m₀, rfl | rfl⟩ := m.eq_nat_or_neg
· exact this (ofNat_nonneg m₀)
let q := ⌈↑m₀ / (n : k)⌉
let m₁ := q * ↑n - (↑m₀ : ℤ)
have hm₁ : 0 ≤ m₁ := by
simpa [m₁, ← @cast_le k, ← div_le_iff hn] using FloorRing.gc_ceil_coe.le_u_l _
calc
fract ((Int.cast (-(m₀ : ℤ)) : k) / (n : k))
-- Porting note: the `rw [cast_neg, cast_natCast]` was `push_cast`
= fract (-(m₀ : k) / n) := by rw [cast_neg, cast_natCast]
_ = fract ((m₁ : k) / n) := ?_
_ = Int.cast (m₁ % (n : ℤ)) / Nat.cast n := this hm₁
_ = Int.cast (-(↑m₀ : ℤ) % ↑n) / Nat.cast n := ?_
· rw [← fract_int_add q, ← mul_div_cancel_right₀ (q : k) hn.ne', ← add_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
-- Porting note: the `simp` was `push_cast`
simp [m₁]
· congr 2
change (q * ↑n - (↑m₀ : ℤ)) % ↑n = _
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm (q * ↑n), add_mul_emod_self]
#align int.fract_div_int_cast_eq_div_int_cast_mod Int.fract_div_intCast_eq_div_intCast_mod
end LinearOrderedField
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil ((↑) : ℤ → α) :=
FloorRing.gc_ceil_coe
#align int.gc_ceil_coe Int.gc_ceil_coe
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉ ≤ z ↔ a ≤ z :=
gc_ceil_coe a z
#align int.ceil_le Int.ceil_le
theorem floor_neg : ⌊-a⌋ = -⌈a⌉ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun z => by rw [le_neg, ceil_le, le_floor, Int.cast_neg, le_neg]
#align int.floor_neg Int.floor_neg
theorem ceil_neg : ⌈-a⌉ = -⌊a⌋ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun z => by rw [neg_le, ceil_le, le_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le]
#align int.ceil_neg Int.ceil_neg
theorem lt_ceil : z < ⌈a⌉ ↔ (z : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align int.lt_ceil Int.lt_ceil
@[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : z + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉ ↔ (z : α) < a := by rw [← lt_ceil, add_one_le_iff]
#align int.add_one_le_ceil_iff Int.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add (1 : ℤ), add_one_le_ceil_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.one_le_ceil_iff Int.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉ ≤ ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align int.ceil_le_floor_add_one Int.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉ :=
gc_ceil_coe.le_u_l a
#align int.le_ceil Int.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌈(z : α)⌉ = z :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_le]
#align int.ceil_int_cast Int.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.ceil_nat_cast Int.ceil_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌉ = n := ceil_natCast n
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℤ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align int.ceil_mono Int.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉ ≤ ⌈y⌉ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈a + z⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + z := by
rw [← neg_inj, neg_add', ← floor_neg, ← floor_neg, neg_add', floor_sub_int]
#align int.ceil_add_int Int.ceil_add_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + n := by rw [← Int.cast_natCast, ceil_add_int]
#align int.ceil_add_nat Int.ceil_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a + 1⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_int a (1 : ℤ)`
rw [← ceil_add_int a (1 : ℤ), cast_one]
#align int.ceil_add_one Int.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈a - z⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (ceil_add_int _ _)
#align int.ceil_sub_int Int.ceil_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a - n⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - n := by
convert ceil_sub_int a n using 1
simp
#align int.ceil_sub_nat Int.ceil_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_one (a : α) : ⌈a - 1⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - 1 := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← ceil_add_one, sub_add_cancel]
#align int.ceil_sub_one Int.ceil_sub_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (a : α) : (⌈a⌉ : α) < a + 1 := by
rw [← lt_ceil, ← Int.cast_one, ceil_add_int]
apply lt_add_one
#align int.ceil_lt_add_one Int.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉ ≤ ⌈a⌉ + ⌈b⌉ := by
rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align int.ceil_add_le Int.ceil_add_le
theorem ceil_add_ceil_le (a b : α) : ⌈a⌉ + ⌈b⌉ ≤ ⌈a + b⌉ + 1 := by
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, ceil_le, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, le_sub_comm]
refine (ceil_lt_add_one _).le.trans ?_
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le', ← add_assoc, add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_ceil _
#align int.ceil_add_ceil_le Int.ceil_add_ceil_le
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align int.ceil_pos Int.ceil_pos
@[simp]
theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, ceil_intCast]
#align int.ceil_zero Int.ceil_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_one : ⌈(1 : α)⌉ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, ceil_intCast]
#align int.ceil_one Int.ceil_one
theorem ceil_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 ≤ ⌈a⌉ := mod_cast ha.trans (le_ceil a)
#align int.ceil_nonneg Int.ceil_nonneg
theorem ceil_eq_iff : ⌈a⌉ = z ↔ ↑z - 1 < a ∧ a ≤ z := by
rw [← ceil_le, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_sub, ← lt_ceil, Int.sub_one_lt_iff, le_antisymm_iff,
and_comm]
#align int.ceil_eq_iff Int.ceil_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_zero_iff : ⌈a⌉ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ioc (-1 : α) 0 := by simp [ceil_eq_iff]
#align int.ceil_eq_zero_iff Int.ceil_eq_zero_iff
theorem ceil_eq_on_Ioc (z : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ioc (z - 1 : α) z, ⌈a⌉ = z := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
ceil_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc Int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc
theorem ceil_eq_on_Ioc' (z : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ioc (z - 1 : α) z, (⌈a⌉ : α) = z := fun a ha =>
mod_cast ceil_eq_on_Ioc z a ha
#align int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc' Int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc'
theorem floor_le_ceil (a : α) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ ⌈a⌉ :=
cast_le.1 <| (floor_le _).trans <| le_ceil _
#align int.floor_le_ceil Int.floor_le_ceil
theorem floor_lt_ceil_of_lt {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ⌊a⌋ < ⌈b⌉ :=
cast_lt.1 <| (floor_le a).trans_lt <| h.trans_le <| le_ceil b
#align int.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt Int.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m : α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ceil_singleton (m : ℤ) : (ceil : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ioc ((m : α) - 1) m :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_ceil_singleton Int.preimage_ceil_singleton
theorem fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil (a : α) : fract a = 0 ∨ fract a = a + 1 - (⌈a⌉ : α) := by
rcases eq_or_ne (fract a) 0 with ha | ha
· exact Or.inl ha
right
suffices (⌈a⌉ : α) = ⌊a⌋ + 1 by
rw [this, ← self_sub_fract]
abel
norm_cast
rw [ceil_eq_iff]
refine ⟨?_, _root_.le_of_lt <| by simp⟩
rw [cast_add, cast_one, add_tsub_cancel_right, ← self_sub_fract a, sub_lt_self_iff]
exact ha.symm.lt_of_le (fract_nonneg a)
#align int.fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil Int.fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil
theorem ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract (ha : fract a ≠ 0) : (⌈a⌉ : α) = a + 1 - fract a := by
rw [(or_iff_right ha).mp (fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil a)]
abel
#align int.ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract Int.ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract
theorem ceil_sub_self_eq (ha : fract a ≠ 0) : (⌈a⌉ : α) - a = 1 - fract a := by
rw [(or_iff_right ha).mp (fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil a)]
abel
#align int.ceil_sub_self_eq Int.ceil_sub_self_eq
/-! #### Intervals -/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioo a b = Set.Ioo ⌊a⌋ ⌈b⌉ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Ioo Int.preimage_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ico a b = Set.Ico ⌈a⌉ ⌈b⌉ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Ico Int.preimage_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioc a b = Set.Ioc ⌊a⌋ ⌊b⌋ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Ioc Int.preimage_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Icc a b = Set.Icc ⌈a⌉ ⌊b⌋ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Icc Int.preimage_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioi a = Set.Ioi ⌊a⌋ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt]
#align int.preimage_Ioi Int.preimage_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ici a = Set.Ici ⌈a⌉ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le]
#align int.preimage_Ici Int.preimage_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iio a = Set.Iio ⌈a⌉ := by
ext
simp [lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Iio Int.preimage_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iic a = Set.Iic ⌊a⌋ := by
ext
simp [le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Iic Int.preimage_Iic
end Int
open Int
/-! ### Round -/
section round
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α]
/-- `round` rounds a number to the nearest integer. `round (1 / 2) = 1` -/
def round (x : α) : ℤ :=
if 2 * fract x < 1 then ⌊x⌋ else ⌈x⌉
#align round round
@[simp]
theorem round_zero : round (0 : α) = 0 := by simp [round]
#align round_zero round_zero
@[simp]
theorem round_one : round (1 : α) = 1 := by simp [round]
#align round_one round_one
@[simp]
theorem round_natCast (n : ℕ) : round (n : α) = n := by simp [round]
#align round_nat_cast round_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem round_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : round (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)) = n :=
round_natCast n
@[simp]
theorem round_intCast (n : ℤ) : round (n : α) = n := by simp [round]
#align round_int_cast round_intCast
@[simp]
theorem round_add_int (x : α) (y : ℤ) : round (x + y) = round x + y := by
rw [round, round, Int.fract_add_int, Int.floor_add_int, Int.ceil_add_int, ← apply_ite₂, ite_self]
#align round_add_int round_add_int
@[simp]
theorem round_add_one (a : α) : round (a + 1) = round a + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert round_add_int a 1`
rw [← round_add_int a 1, cast_one]
#align round_add_one round_add_one
@[simp]
theorem round_sub_int (x : α) (y : ℤ) : round (x - y) = round x - y := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
norm_cast
rw [round_add_int, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align round_sub_int round_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem round_sub_one (a : α) : round (a - 1) = round a - 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert round_sub_int a 1`
rw [← round_sub_int a 1, cast_one]
#align round_sub_one round_sub_one
@[simp]
theorem round_add_nat (x : α) (y : ℕ) : round (x + y) = round x + y :=
mod_cast round_add_int x y
#align round_add_nat round_add_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem round_add_ofNat (x : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
round (x + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = round x + OfNat.ofNat n :=
round_add_nat x n
@[simp]
theorem round_sub_nat (x : α) (y : ℕ) : round (x - y) = round x - y :=
mod_cast round_sub_int x y
#align round_sub_nat round_sub_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem round_sub_ofNat (x : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
round (x - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = round x - OfNat.ofNat n :=
round_sub_nat x n
@[simp]
theorem round_int_add (x : α) (y : ℤ) : round ((y : α) + x) = y + round x := by
rw [add_comm, round_add_int, add_comm]
#align round_int_add round_int_add
@[simp]
theorem round_nat_add (x : α) (y : ℕ) : round ((y : α) + x) = y + round x := by
rw [add_comm, round_add_nat, add_comm]
#align round_nat_add round_nat_add
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem round_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (x : α) :
round ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + x) = OfNat.ofNat n + round x :=
round_nat_add x n
theorem abs_sub_round_eq_min (x : α) : |x - round x| = min (fract x) (1 - fract x) := by
simp_rw [round, min_def_lt, two_mul, ← lt_tsub_iff_left]
cases' lt_or_ge (fract x) (1 - fract x) with hx hx
· rw [if_pos hx, if_pos hx, self_sub_floor, abs_fract]
· have : 0 < fract x := by
replace hx : 0 < fract x + fract x := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (tsub_le_iff_left.mp hx)
simpa only [← two_mul, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left, zero_lt_two] using hx
rw [if_neg (not_lt.mpr hx), if_neg (not_lt.mpr hx), abs_sub_comm, ceil_sub_self_eq this.ne.symm,
abs_one_sub_fract]
#align abs_sub_round_eq_min abs_sub_round_eq_min
theorem round_le (x : α) (z : ℤ) : |x - round x| ≤ |x - z| := by
rw [abs_sub_round_eq_min, min_le_iff]
rcases le_or_lt (z : α) x with (hx | hx) <;> [left; right]
· conv_rhs => rw [abs_eq_self.mpr (sub_nonneg.mpr hx), ← fract_add_floor x, add_sub_assoc]
simpa only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, sub_nonneg, cast_le] using le_floor.mpr hx
· rw [abs_eq_neg_self.mpr (sub_neg.mpr hx).le]
conv_rhs => rw [← fract_add_floor x]
rw [add_sub_assoc, add_comm, neg_add, neg_sub, le_add_neg_iff_add_le, sub_add_cancel,
le_sub_comm]
norm_cast
exact floor_le_sub_one_iff.mpr hx
#align round_le round_le
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField α] [FloorRing α]
theorem round_eq (x : α) : round x = ⌊x + 1 / 2⌋ := by
simp_rw [round, (by simp only [lt_div_iff', two_pos] : 2 * fract x < 1 ↔ fract x < 1 / 2)]
cases' lt_or_le (fract x) (1 / 2) with hx hx
· conv_rhs => rw [← fract_add_floor x, add_assoc, add_left_comm, floor_int_add]
rw [if_pos hx, self_eq_add_right, floor_eq_iff, cast_zero, zero_add]
constructor
· linarith [fract_nonneg x]
· linarith
· have : ⌊fract x + 1 / 2⌋ = 1 := by
rw [floor_eq_iff]
constructor
· norm_num
linarith
· norm_num
linarith [fract_lt_one x]
rw [if_neg (not_lt.mpr hx), ← fract_add_floor x, add_assoc, add_left_comm, floor_int_add,
ceil_add_int, add_comm _ ⌊x⌋, add_right_inj, ceil_eq_iff, this, cast_one, sub_self]
constructor
· linarith
· linarith [fract_lt_one x]
#align round_eq round_eq
@[simp]
theorem round_two_inv : round (2⁻¹ : α) = 1 := by
simp only [round_eq, ← one_div, add_halves', floor_one]
#align round_two_inv round_two_inv
@[simp]
theorem round_neg_two_inv : round (-2⁻¹ : α) = 0 := by
simp only [round_eq, ← one_div, add_left_neg, floor_zero]
#align round_neg_two_inv round_neg_two_inv
@[simp]
theorem round_eq_zero_iff {x : α} : round x = 0 ↔ x ∈ Ico (-(1 / 2)) ((1 : α) / 2) := by
rw [round_eq, floor_eq_zero_iff, add_mem_Ico_iff_left]
norm_num
#align round_eq_zero_iff round_eq_zero_iff
theorem abs_sub_round (x : α) : |x - round x| ≤ 1 / 2 := by
rw [round_eq, abs_sub_le_iff]
have := floor_le (x + 1 / 2)
have := lt_floor_add_one (x + 1 / 2)
constructor <;> linarith
#align abs_sub_round abs_sub_round
theorem abs_sub_round_div_natCast_eq {m n : ℕ} :
|(m : α) / n - round ((m : α) / n)| = ↑(min (m % n) (n - m % n)) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
have hn' : 0 < (n : α) := by
norm_cast
rw [abs_sub_round_eq_min, Nat.cast_min, ← min_div_div_right hn'.le,
fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod, Nat.cast_sub (m.mod_lt hn).le, sub_div, div_self hn'.ne']
#align abs_sub_round_div_nat_cast_eq abs_sub_round_div_natCast_eq
end LinearOrderedField
end round
namespace Nat
variable [LinearOrderedSemiring α] [LinearOrderedSemiring β] [FloorSemiring α] [FloorSemiring β]
variable [FunLike F α β] [RingHomClass F α β] {a : α} {b : β}
theorem floor_congr (h : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : α) ≤ a ↔ (n : β) ≤ b) : ⌊a⌋₊ = ⌊b⌋₊ := by
have h₀ : 0 ≤ a ↔ 0 ≤ b := by simpa only [cast_zero] using h 0
obtain ha | ha := lt_or_le a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha.le, floor_of_nonpos (le_of_not_le <| h₀.not.mp ha.not_le)]
exact (le_floor <| (h _).1 <| floor_le ha).antisymm (le_floor <| (h _).2 <| floor_le <| h₀.1 ha)
#align nat.floor_congr Nat.floor_congr
theorem ceil_congr (h : ∀ n : ℕ, a ≤ n ↔ b ≤ n) : ⌈a⌉₊ = ⌈b⌉₊ :=
(ceil_le.2 <| (h _).2 <| le_ceil _).antisymm <| ceil_le.2 <| (h _).1 <| le_ceil _
#align nat.ceil_congr Nat.ceil_congr
theorem map_floor (f : F) (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) : ⌊f a⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ :=
floor_congr fun n => by rw [← map_natCast f, hf.le_iff_le]
#align nat.map_floor Nat.map_floor
theorem map_ceil (f : F) (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) : ⌈f a⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ :=
ceil_congr fun n => by rw [← map_natCast f, hf.le_iff_le]
#align nat.map_ceil Nat.map_ceil
end Nat
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [LinearOrderedRing β] [FloorRing α] [FloorRing β]
variable [FunLike F α β] [RingHomClass F α β] {a : α} {b : β}
theorem floor_congr (h : ∀ n : ℤ, (n : α) ≤ a ↔ (n : β) ≤ b) : ⌊a⌋ = ⌊b⌋ :=
(le_floor.2 <| (h _).1 <| floor_le _).antisymm <| le_floor.2 <| (h _).2 <| floor_le _
#align int.floor_congr Int.floor_congr
theorem ceil_congr (h : ∀ n : ℤ, a ≤ n ↔ b ≤ n) : ⌈a⌉ = ⌈b⌉ :=
(ceil_le.2 <| (h _).2 <| le_ceil _).antisymm <| ceil_le.2 <| (h _).1 <| le_ceil _
#align int.ceil_congr Int.ceil_congr
theorem map_floor (f : F) (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) : ⌊f a⌋ = ⌊a⌋ :=
floor_congr fun n => by rw [← map_intCast f, hf.le_iff_le]
#align int.map_floor Int.map_floor
theorem map_ceil (f : F) (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) : ⌈f a⌉ = ⌈a⌉ :=
ceil_congr fun n => by rw [← map_intCast f, hf.le_iff_le]
#align int.map_ceil Int.map_ceil
theorem map_fract (f : F) (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) : fract (f a) = f (fract a) := by
simp_rw [fract, map_sub, map_intCast, map_floor _ hf]
#align int.map_fract Int.map_fract
end Int
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedField α] [LinearOrderedField β] [FloorRing α] [FloorRing β]
variable [FunLike F α β] [RingHomClass F α β] {a : α} {b : β}
theorem map_round (f : F) (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) : round (f a) = round a := by
have H : f 2 = 2 := map_natCast f 2
simp_rw [round_eq, ← map_floor _ hf, map_add, one_div, map_inv₀, H]
-- Porting note: was
-- simp_rw [round_eq, ← map_floor _ hf, map_add, one_div, map_inv₀, map_bit0, map_one]
-- Would have thought that `map_natCast` would replace `map_bit0, map_one` but seems not
#align int.map_round Int.map_round
end Int
section FloorRingToSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α]
/-! #### A floor ring as a floor semiring -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) FloorRing.toFloorSemiring : FloorSemiring α where
floor a := ⌊a⌋.toNat
ceil a := ⌈a⌉.toNat
floor_of_neg {a} ha := Int.toNat_of_nonpos (Int.floor_nonpos ha.le)
gc_floor {a n} ha := by rw [Int.le_toNat (Int.floor_nonneg.2 ha), Int.le_floor, Int.cast_natCast]
gc_ceil a n := by rw [Int.toNat_le, Int.ceil_le, Int.cast_natCast]
#align floor_ring.to_floor_semiring FloorRing.toFloorSemiring
theorem Int.floor_toNat (a : α) : ⌊a⌋.toNat = ⌊a⌋₊ :=
rfl
#align int.floor_to_nat Int.floor_toNat
theorem Int.ceil_toNat (a : α) : ⌈a⌉.toNat = ⌈a⌉₊ :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_to_nat Int.ceil_toNat
@[simp]
theorem Nat.floor_int : (Nat.floor : ℤ → ℕ) = Int.toNat :=
rfl
#align nat.floor_int Nat.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem Nat.ceil_int : (Nat.ceil : ℤ → ℕ) = Int.toNat :=
rfl
#align nat.ceil_int Nat.ceil_int
variable {a : α}
theorem Int.ofNat_floor_eq_floor (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : ℤ) = ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.floor_toNat, Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.floor_nonneg.2 ha)]
#align nat.cast_floor_eq_int_floor Int.ofNat_floor_eq_floor
theorem Int.ofNat_ceil_eq_ceil (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : ℤ) = ⌈a⌉ := by
rw [← Int.ceil_toNat, Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.ceil_nonneg ha)]
#align nat.cast_ceil_eq_int_ceil Int.ofNat_ceil_eq_ceil
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,736 | 1,737 | theorem natCast_floor_eq_intCast_floor (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : α) = ⌊a⌋ := by |
rw [← Int.ofNat_floor_eq_floor ha, Int.cast_natCast]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import order.upper_lower.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c0c52abb75074ed8b73a948341f50521fbf43b4c"
/-!
# Up-sets and down-sets
This file defines upper and lower sets in an order.
## Main declarations
* `IsUpperSet`: Predicate for a set to be an upper set. This means every element greater than a
member of the set is in the set itself.
* `IsLowerSet`: Predicate for a set to be a lower set. This means every element less than a member
of the set is in the set itself.
* `UpperSet`: The type of upper sets.
* `LowerSet`: The type of lower sets.
* `upperClosure`: The greatest upper set containing a set.
* `lowerClosure`: The least lower set containing a set.
* `UpperSet.Ici`: Principal upper set. `Set.Ici` as an upper set.
* `UpperSet.Ioi`: Strict principal upper set. `Set.Ioi` as an upper set.
* `LowerSet.Iic`: Principal lower set. `Set.Iic` as a lower set.
* `LowerSet.Iio`: Strict principal lower set. `Set.Iio` as a lower set.
## Notation
* `×ˢ` is notation for `UpperSet.prod` / `LowerSet.prod`.
## Notes
Upper sets are ordered by **reverse** inclusion. This convention is motivated by the fact that this
makes them order-isomorphic to lower sets and antichains, and matches the convention on `Filter`.
## TODO
Lattice structure on antichains. Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-! ### Unbundled upper/lower sets -/
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
/-- An upper set in an order `α` is a set such that any element greater than one of its members is
also a member. Also called up-set, upward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsUpperSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a ≤ b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_upper_set IsUpperSet
/-- A lower set in an order `α` is a set such that any element less than one of its members is also
a member. Also called down-set, downward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsLowerSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b ≤ a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_lower_set IsLowerSet
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_empty isUpperSet_empty
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_empty isLowerSet_empty
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_univ isUpperSet_univ
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_univ isLowerSet_univ
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_upper_set.compl IsUpperSet.compl
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_lower_set.compl IsLowerSet.compl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
#align is_upper_set_compl isUpperSet_compl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
#align is_lower_set_compl isLowerSet_compl
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.union IsUpperSet.union
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.union IsLowerSet.union
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.inter IsUpperSet.inter
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.inter IsLowerSet.inter
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_upper_set_sUnion isUpperSet_sUnion
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_lower_set_sUnion isLowerSet_sUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Union isUpperSet_iUnion
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Union isLowerSet_iUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Union₂ isUpperSet_iUnion₂
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Union₂ isLowerSet_iUnion₂
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_upper_set_sInter isUpperSet_sInter
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_lower_set_sInter isLowerSet_sInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Inter isUpperSet_iInter
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Inter isLowerSet_iInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Inter₂ isUpperSet_iInter₂
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Inter₂ isLowerSet_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.to_dual IsUpperSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.to_dual IsLowerSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.of_dual IsUpperSet.ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.of_dual IsLowerSet.ofDual
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
#align is_upper_set_Ici isUpperSet_Ici
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
#align is_lower_set_Iic isLowerSet_Iic
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
#align is_upper_set_Ioi isUpperSet_Ioi
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
#align is_lower_set_Iio isLowerSet_Iio
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_upper_set_iff_Ici_subset isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_lower_set_iff_Iic_subset isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
#align is_upper_set.Ici_subset IsUpperSet.Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
#align is_lower_set.Iic_subset IsLowerSet.Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
#align is_upper_set.Ioi_subset IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
#align is_lower_set.Iio_subset IsLowerSet.Iio_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
#align is_upper_set.ord_connected IsUpperSet.ordConnected
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
#align is_lower_set.ord_connected IsLowerSet.ordConnected
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
#align is_upper_set.preimage IsUpperSet.preimage
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
#align is_lower_set.preimage IsLowerSet.preimage
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
#align is_upper_set.image IsUpperSet.image
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
#align is_lower_set.image IsLowerSet.image
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.monotone_mem Set.monotone_mem
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
#align set.antitone_mem Set.antitone_mem
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_set_of isUpperSet_setOf
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
#align is_lower_set_set_of isLowerSet_setOf
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
#align is_lower_set.top_mem IsLowerSet.top_mem
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
#align is_upper_set.top_mem IsUpperSet.top_mem
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
#align is_upper_set.not_top_mem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
#align is_upper_set.bot_mem IsUpperSet.bot_mem
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
#align is_lower_set.bot_mem IsLowerSet.bot_mem
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
#align is_lower_set.not_bot_mem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
#align is_upper_set.not_bdd_above IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
#align not_bdd_above_Ici not_bddAbove_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
#align not_bdd_above_Ioi not_bddAbove_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
#align is_lower_set.not_bdd_below IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
#align not_bdd_below_Iic not_bddBelow_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
#align not_bdd_below_Iio not_bddBelow_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
#align is_upper_set_iff_forall_lt isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
#align is_lower_set_iff_forall_lt isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_upper_set_iff_Ioi_subset isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_lower_set_iff_Iio_subset isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
#align is_upper_set.total IsUpperSet.total
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
#align is_lower_set.total IsLowerSet.total
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Bundled upper/lower sets -/
section LE
variable [LE α]
/-- The type of upper sets of an order. -/
structure UpperSet (α : Type*) [LE α] where
/-- The carrier of an `UpperSet`. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The carrier of an `UpperSet` is an upper set. -/
upper' : IsUpperSet carrier
#align upper_set UpperSet
/-- The type of lower sets of an order. -/
structure LowerSet (α : Type*) [LE α] where
/-- The carrier of a `LowerSet`. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The carrier of a `LowerSet` is a lower set. -/
lower' : IsLowerSet carrier
#align lower_set LowerSet
namespace UpperSet
instance : SetLike (UpperSet α) α where
coe := UpperSet.carrier
coe_injective' s t h := by cases s; cases t; congr
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (s : UpperSet α) : Set α := s
initialize_simps_projections UpperSet (carrier → coe)
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : UpperSet α} : (s : Set α) = t → s = t :=
SetLike.ext'
#align upper_set.ext UpperSet.ext
@[simp]
theorem carrier_eq_coe (s : UpperSet α) : s.carrier = s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.carrier_eq_coe UpperSet.carrier_eq_coe
@[simp] protected lemma upper (s : UpperSet α) : IsUpperSet (s : Set α) := s.upper'
#align upper_set.upper UpperSet.upper
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (s : Set α) (hs) : mk s hs = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {s : Set α} (hs) {a : α} : a ∈ mk s hs ↔ a ∈ s := Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_mk UpperSet.mem_mk
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
instance : SetLike (LowerSet α) α where
coe := LowerSet.carrier
coe_injective' s t h := by cases s; cases t; congr
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (s : LowerSet α) : Set α := s
initialize_simps_projections LowerSet (carrier → coe)
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : LowerSet α} : (s : Set α) = t → s = t :=
SetLike.ext'
#align lower_set.ext LowerSet.ext
@[simp]
theorem carrier_eq_coe (s : LowerSet α) : s.carrier = s :=
rfl
#align lower_set.carrier_eq_coe LowerSet.carrier_eq_coe
@[simp] protected lemma lower (s : LowerSet α) : IsLowerSet (s : Set α) := s.lower'
#align lower_set.lower LowerSet.lower
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (s : Set α) (hs) : mk s hs = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {s : Set α} (hs) {a : α} : a ∈ mk s hs ↔ a ∈ s := Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_mk LowerSet.mem_mk
end LowerSet
/-! #### Order -/
namespace UpperSet
variable {S : Set (UpperSet α)} {s t : UpperSet α} {a : α}
instance : Sup (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∩ t, s.upper.inter t.upper⟩⟩
instance : Inf (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∪ t, s.upper.union t.upper⟩⟩
instance : Top (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⟨∅, isUpperSet_empty⟩⟩
instance : Bot (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⟨univ, isUpperSet_univ⟩⟩
instance : SupSet (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s, isUpperSet_iInter₂ fun s _ => s.upper⟩⟩
instance : InfSet (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isUpperSet_iUnion₂ fun s _ => s.upper⟩⟩
instance completelyDistribLattice : CompletelyDistribLattice (UpperSet α) :=
(toDual.injective.comp SetLike.coe_injective).completelyDistribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) rfl rfl
instance : Inhabited (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊆ t ↔ t ≤ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.coe_subset_coe UpperSet.coe_subset_coe
@[simp 1100, norm_cast] lemma coe_ssubset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊂ t ↔ t < s := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : UpperSet α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_top UpperSet.coe_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : UpperSet α) : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_bot UpperSet.coe_bot
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ : (s : Set α) = univ ↔ s = ⊥ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align upper_set.coe_eq_univ UpperSet.coe_eq_univ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ⊤ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align upper_set.coe_eq_empty UpperSet.coe_eq_empty
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonempty : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ⊤ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans coe_eq_empty.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : UpperSet α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∩ t :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_sup UpperSet.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : UpperSet α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_inf UpperSet.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_Sup UpperSet.coe_sSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set α) = ⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_Inf UpperSet.coe_sInf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iSup (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (↑(⨆ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋂ i, f i := by simp [iSup]
#align upper_set.coe_supr UpperSet.coe_iSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (↑(⨅ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋃ i, f i := by simp [iInf]
#align upper_set.coe_infi UpperSet.coe_iInf
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(↑(⨆ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋂ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iSup]
#align upper_set.coe_supr₂ UpperSet.coe_iSup₂
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(↑(⨅ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋃ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iInf]
#align upper_set.coe_infi₂ UpperSet.coe_iInf₂
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_top : a ∉ (⊤ : UpperSet α) :=
id
#align upper_set.not_mem_top UpperSet.not_mem_top
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot : a ∈ (⊥ : UpperSet α) :=
trivial
#align upper_set.mem_bot UpperSet.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup_iff : a ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_sup_iff UpperSet.mem_sup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf_iff : a ∈ s ⊓ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_inf_iff UpperSet.mem_inf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup_iff : a ∈ sSup S ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iInter₂
#align upper_set.mem_Sup_iff UpperSet.mem_sSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf_iff : a ∈ sInf S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iUnion₂.trans <| by simp only [exists_prop, SetLike.mem_coe]
#align upper_set.mem_Inf_iff UpperSet.mem_sInf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup_iff {f : ι → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup]
exact mem_iInter
#align upper_set.mem_supr_iff UpperSet.mem_iSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf_iff {f : ι → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iInf]
exact mem_iUnion
#align upper_set.mem_infi_iff UpperSet.mem_iInf_iff
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem mem_iSup₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, a ∈ f i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iSup_iff]
#align upper_set.mem_supr₂_iff UpperSet.mem_iSup₂_iff
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem mem_iInf₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∃ i j, a ∈ f i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInf_iff]
#align upper_set.mem_infi₂_iff UpperSet.mem_iInf₂_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem codisjoint_coe : Codisjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp [disjoint_iff, codisjoint_iff, SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align upper_set.codisjoint_coe UpperSet.codisjoint_coe
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
variable {S : Set (LowerSet α)} {s t : LowerSet α} {a : α}
instance : Sup (LowerSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∪ t, fun _ _ h => Or.imp (s.lower h) (t.lower h)⟩⟩
instance : Inf (LowerSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∩ t, fun _ _ h => And.imp (s.lower h) (t.lower h)⟩⟩
instance : Top (LowerSet α) :=
⟨⟨univ, fun _ _ _ => id⟩⟩
instance : Bot (LowerSet α) :=
⟨⟨∅, fun _ _ _ => id⟩⟩
instance : SupSet (LowerSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isLowerSet_iUnion₂ fun s _ => s.lower⟩⟩
instance : InfSet (LowerSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s, isLowerSet_iInter₂ fun s _ => s.lower⟩⟩
instance completelyDistribLattice : CompletelyDistribLattice (LowerSet α) :=
SetLike.coe_injective.completelyDistribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
(fun _ => rfl) rfl rfl
instance : Inhabited (LowerSet α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_subset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊆ t ↔ s ≤ t := Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.coe_subset_coe LowerSet.coe_subset_coe
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ssubset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊂ t ↔ s < t := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : LowerSet α) : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_top LowerSet.coe_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : LowerSet α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_bot LowerSet.coe_bot
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ : (s : Set α) = univ ↔ s = ⊤ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align lower_set.coe_eq_univ LowerSet.coe_eq_univ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ⊥ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align lower_set.coe_eq_empty LowerSet.coe_eq_empty
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonempty : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ⊥ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans coe_eq_empty.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : LowerSet α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_sup LowerSet.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : LowerSet α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∩ t :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_inf LowerSet.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup (S : Set (LowerSet α)) : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_Sup LowerSet.coe_sSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (LowerSet α)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set α) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_Inf LowerSet.coe_sInf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iSup (f : ι → LowerSet α) : (↑(⨆ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋃ i, f i := by
simp_rw [iSup, coe_sSup, mem_range, iUnion_exists, iUnion_iUnion_eq']
#align lower_set.coe_supr LowerSet.coe_iSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf (f : ι → LowerSet α) : (↑(⨅ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋂ i, f i := by
simp_rw [iInf, coe_sInf, mem_range, iInter_exists, iInter_iInter_eq']
#align lower_set.coe_infi LowerSet.coe_iInf
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α) :
(↑(⨆ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋃ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iSup]
#align lower_set.coe_supr₂ LowerSet.coe_iSup₂
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α) :
(↑(⨅ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋂ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iInf]
#align lower_set.coe_infi₂ LowerSet.coe_iInf₂
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : a ∈ (⊤ : LowerSet α) :=
trivial
#align lower_set.mem_top LowerSet.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : a ∉ (⊥ : LowerSet α) :=
id
#align lower_set.not_mem_bot LowerSet.not_mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup_iff : a ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_sup_iff LowerSet.mem_sup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf_iff : a ∈ s ⊓ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_inf_iff LowerSet.mem_inf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup_iff : a ∈ sSup S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iUnion₂.trans <| by simp only [exists_prop, SetLike.mem_coe]
#align lower_set.mem_Sup_iff LowerSet.mem_sSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf_iff : a ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iInter₂
#align lower_set.mem_Inf_iff LowerSet.mem_sInf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup_iff {f : ι → LowerSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ i, f i) ↔ ∃ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup]
exact mem_iUnion
#align lower_set.mem_supr_iff LowerSet.mem_iSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf_iff {f : ι → LowerSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iInf]
exact mem_iInter
#align lower_set.mem_infi_iff LowerSet.mem_iInf_iff
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem mem_iSup₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∃ i j, a ∈ f i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iSup_iff]
#align lower_set.mem_supr₂_iff LowerSet.mem_iSup₂_iff
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem mem_iInf₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, a ∈ f i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInf_iff]
#align lower_set.mem_infi₂_iff LowerSet.mem_iInf₂_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem disjoint_coe : Disjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp [disjoint_iff, SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align lower_set.disjoint_coe LowerSet.disjoint_coe
end LowerSet
/-! #### Complement -/
/-- The complement of a lower set as an upper set. -/
def UpperSet.compl (s : UpperSet α) : LowerSet α :=
⟨sᶜ, s.upper.compl⟩
#align upper_set.compl UpperSet.compl
/-- The complement of a lower set as an upper set. -/
def LowerSet.compl (s : LowerSet α) : UpperSet α :=
⟨sᶜ, s.lower.compl⟩
#align lower_set.compl LowerSet.compl
namespace UpperSet
variable {s t : UpperSet α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem coe_compl (s : UpperSet α) : (s.compl : Set α) = (↑s)ᶜ :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_compl UpperSet.coe_compl
@[simp]
theorem mem_compl_iff : a ∈ s.compl ↔ a ∉ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_compl_iff UpperSet.mem_compl_iff
@[simp]
nonrec theorem compl_compl (s : UpperSet α) : s.compl.compl = s :=
UpperSet.ext <| compl_compl _
#align upper_set.compl_compl UpperSet.compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_le_compl : s.compl ≤ t.compl ↔ s ≤ t :=
compl_subset_compl
#align upper_set.compl_le_compl UpperSet.compl_le_compl
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_sup (s t : UpperSet α) : (s ⊔ t).compl = s.compl ⊔ t.compl :=
LowerSet.ext compl_inf
#align upper_set.compl_sup UpperSet.compl_sup
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_inf (s t : UpperSet α) : (s ⊓ t).compl = s.compl ⊓ t.compl :=
LowerSet.ext compl_sup
#align upper_set.compl_inf UpperSet.compl_inf
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_top : (⊤ : UpperSet α).compl = ⊤ :=
LowerSet.ext compl_empty
#align upper_set.compl_top UpperSet.compl_top
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : UpperSet α).compl = ⊥ :=
LowerSet.ext compl_univ
#align upper_set.compl_bot UpperSet.compl_bot
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_sSup (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (sSup S).compl = ⨆ s ∈ S, UpperSet.compl s :=
LowerSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_sSup, compl_iInter₂, LowerSet.coe_iSup₂]
#align upper_set.compl_Sup UpperSet.compl_sSup
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_sInf (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (sInf S).compl = ⨅ s ∈ S, UpperSet.compl s :=
LowerSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_sInf, compl_iUnion₂, LowerSet.coe_iInf₂]
#align upper_set.compl_Inf UpperSet.compl_sInf
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_iSup (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (⨆ i, f i).compl = ⨆ i, (f i).compl :=
LowerSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_iSup, compl_iInter, LowerSet.coe_iSup]
#align upper_set.compl_supr UpperSet.compl_iSup
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_iInf (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (⨅ i, f i).compl = ⨅ i, (f i).compl :=
LowerSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_iInf, compl_iUnion, LowerSet.coe_iInf]
#align upper_set.compl_infi UpperSet.compl_iInf
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem compl_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(⨆ (i) (j), f i j).compl = ⨆ (i) (j), (f i j).compl := by simp_rw [UpperSet.compl_iSup]
#align upper_set.compl_supr₂ UpperSet.compl_iSup₂
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem compl_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(⨅ (i) (j), f i j).compl = ⨅ (i) (j), (f i j).compl := by simp_rw [UpperSet.compl_iInf]
#align upper_set.compl_infi₂ UpperSet.compl_iInf₂
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
variable {s t : LowerSet α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem coe_compl (s : LowerSet α) : (s.compl : Set α) = (↑s)ᶜ :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_compl LowerSet.coe_compl
@[simp]
theorem mem_compl_iff : a ∈ s.compl ↔ a ∉ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_compl_iff LowerSet.mem_compl_iff
@[simp]
nonrec theorem compl_compl (s : LowerSet α) : s.compl.compl = s :=
LowerSet.ext <| compl_compl _
#align lower_set.compl_compl LowerSet.compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_le_compl : s.compl ≤ t.compl ↔ s ≤ t :=
compl_subset_compl
#align lower_set.compl_le_compl LowerSet.compl_le_compl
protected theorem compl_sup (s t : LowerSet α) : (s ⊔ t).compl = s.compl ⊔ t.compl :=
UpperSet.ext compl_sup
#align lower_set.compl_sup LowerSet.compl_sup
protected theorem compl_inf (s t : LowerSet α) : (s ⊓ t).compl = s.compl ⊓ t.compl :=
UpperSet.ext compl_inf
#align lower_set.compl_inf LowerSet.compl_inf
protected theorem compl_top : (⊤ : LowerSet α).compl = ⊤ :=
UpperSet.ext compl_univ
#align lower_set.compl_top LowerSet.compl_top
protected theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : LowerSet α).compl = ⊥ :=
UpperSet.ext compl_empty
#align lower_set.compl_bot LowerSet.compl_bot
protected theorem compl_sSup (S : Set (LowerSet α)) : (sSup S).compl = ⨆ s ∈ S, LowerSet.compl s :=
UpperSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_sSup, compl_iUnion₂, UpperSet.coe_iSup₂]
#align lower_set.compl_Sup LowerSet.compl_sSup
protected theorem compl_sInf (S : Set (LowerSet α)) : (sInf S).compl = ⨅ s ∈ S, LowerSet.compl s :=
UpperSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_sInf, compl_iInter₂, UpperSet.coe_iInf₂]
#align lower_set.compl_Inf LowerSet.compl_sInf
protected theorem compl_iSup (f : ι → LowerSet α) : (⨆ i, f i).compl = ⨆ i, (f i).compl :=
UpperSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_iSup, compl_iUnion, UpperSet.coe_iSup]
#align lower_set.compl_supr LowerSet.compl_iSup
protected theorem compl_iInf (f : ι → LowerSet α) : (⨅ i, f i).compl = ⨅ i, (f i).compl :=
UpperSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_iInf, compl_iInter, UpperSet.coe_iInf]
#align lower_set.compl_infi LowerSet.compl_iInf
@[simp]
theorem compl_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α) :
(⨆ (i) (j), f i j).compl = ⨆ (i) (j), (f i j).compl := by simp_rw [LowerSet.compl_iSup]
#align lower_set.compl_supr₂ LowerSet.compl_iSup₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α) :
(⨅ (i) (j), f i j).compl = ⨅ (i) (j), (f i j).compl := by simp_rw [LowerSet.compl_iInf]
#align lower_set.compl_infi₂ LowerSet.compl_iInf₂
end LowerSet
/-- Upper sets are order-isomorphic to lower sets under complementation. -/
@[simps]
def upperSetIsoLowerSet : UpperSet α ≃o LowerSet α where
toFun := UpperSet.compl
invFun := LowerSet.compl
left_inv := UpperSet.compl_compl
right_inv := LowerSet.compl_compl
map_rel_iff' := UpperSet.compl_le_compl
#align upper_set_iso_lower_set upperSetIsoLowerSet
end LE
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
instance UpperSet.isTotal_le : IsTotal (UpperSet α) (· ≤ ·) := ⟨fun s t => t.upper.total s.upper⟩
#align upper_set.is_total_le UpperSet.isTotal_le
instance LowerSet.isTotal_le : IsTotal (LowerSet α) (· ≤ ·) := ⟨fun s t => s.lower.total t.lower⟩
#align lower_set.is_total_le LowerSet.isTotal_le
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (UpperSet α) :=
{ UpperSet.completelyDistribLattice with
le_total := IsTotal.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _
decidableEq := Classical.decRel _
decidableLT := Classical.decRel _ }
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (LowerSet α) :=
{ LowerSet.completelyDistribLattice with
le_total := IsTotal.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _
decidableEq := Classical.decRel _
decidableLT := Classical.decRel _ }
end LinearOrder
/-! #### Map -/
section
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
namespace UpperSet
variable {f : α ≃o β} {s t : UpperSet α} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- An order isomorphism of preorders induces an order isomorphism of their upper sets. -/
def map (f : α ≃o β) : UpperSet α ≃o UpperSet β where
toFun s := ⟨f '' s, s.upper.image f⟩
invFun t := ⟨f ⁻¹' t, t.upper.preimage f.monotone⟩
left_inv _ := ext <| f.preimage_image _
right_inv _ := ext <| f.image_preimage _
map_rel_iff' := image_subset_image_iff f.injective
#align upper_set.map UpperSet.map
@[simp]
theorem symm_map (f : α ≃o β) : (map f).symm = map f.symm :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun s => ext <| by convert Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
#align upper_set.symm_map UpperSet.symm_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map : b ∈ map f s ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [← f.symm_symm, ← symm_map, f.symm_symm]
rfl
#align upper_set.mem_map UpperSet.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_refl : map (OrderIso.refl α) = OrderIso.refl _ := by
ext
simp
#align upper_set.map_refl UpperSet.map_refl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β ≃o γ) (f : α ≃o β) : map g (map f s) = map (f.trans g) s := by
ext
simp
#align upper_set.map_map UpperSet.map_map
variable (f s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map : (map f s : Set β) = f '' s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_map UpperSet.coe_map
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
variable {f : α ≃o β} {s t : LowerSet α} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- An order isomorphism of preorders induces an order isomorphism of their lower sets. -/
def map (f : α ≃o β) : LowerSet α ≃o LowerSet β where
toFun s := ⟨f '' s, s.lower.image f⟩
invFun t := ⟨f ⁻¹' t, t.lower.preimage f.monotone⟩
left_inv _ := SetLike.coe_injective <| f.preimage_image _
right_inv _ := SetLike.coe_injective <| f.image_preimage _
map_rel_iff' := image_subset_image_iff f.injective
#align lower_set.map LowerSet.map
@[simp]
theorem symm_map (f : α ≃o β) : (map f).symm = map f.symm :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun s => ext <| by convert Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
#align lower_set.symm_map LowerSet.symm_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : α ≃o β} {b : β} : b ∈ map f s ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [← f.symm_symm, ← symm_map, f.symm_symm]
rfl
#align lower_set.mem_map LowerSet.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_refl : map (OrderIso.refl α) = OrderIso.refl _ := by
ext
simp
#align lower_set.map_refl LowerSet.map_refl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β ≃o γ) (f : α ≃o β) : map g (map f s) = map (f.trans g) s := by
ext
simp
#align lower_set.map_map LowerSet.map_map
variable (f s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map : (map f s : Set β) = f '' s :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_map LowerSet.coe_map
end LowerSet
namespace UpperSet
@[simp]
theorem compl_map (f : α ≃o β) (s : UpperSet α) : (map f s).compl = LowerSet.map f s.compl :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_compl_eq f.bijective).symm
#align upper_set.compl_map UpperSet.compl_map
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
@[simp]
theorem compl_map (f : α ≃o β) (s : LowerSet α) : (map f s).compl = UpperSet.map f s.compl :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_compl_eq f.bijective).symm
#align lower_set.compl_map LowerSet.compl_map
end LowerSet
end
/-! #### Principal sets -/
namespace UpperSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : UpperSet α} {a b : α}
/-- The smallest upper set containing a given element. -/
nonrec def Ici (a : α) : UpperSet α :=
⟨Ici a, isUpperSet_Ici a⟩
#align upper_set.Ici UpperSet.Ici
/-- The smallest upper set containing a given element. -/
nonrec def Ioi (a : α) : UpperSet α :=
⟨Ioi a, isUpperSet_Ioi a⟩
#align upper_set.Ioi UpperSet.Ioi
@[simp]
theorem coe_Ici (a : α) : ↑(Ici a) = Set.Ici a :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_Ici UpperSet.coe_Ici
@[simp]
theorem coe_Ioi (a : α) : ↑(Ioi a) = Set.Ioi a :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_Ioi UpperSet.coe_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ici_iff : b ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_Ici_iff UpperSet.mem_Ici_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioi_iff : b ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_Ioi_iff UpperSet.mem_Ioi_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_Ici (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) : map f (Ici a) = Ici (f a) := by
ext
simp
#align upper_set.map_Ici UpperSet.map_Ici
@[simp]
theorem map_Ioi (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) : map f (Ioi a) = Ioi (f a) := by
ext
simp
#align upper_set.map_Ioi UpperSet.map_Ioi
theorem Ici_le_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a ≤ Ioi a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align upper_set.Ici_le_Ioi UpperSet.Ici_le_Ioi
@[simp]
nonrec theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Ici_bot
#align upper_set.Ici_bot UpperSet.Ici_bot
@[simp]
nonrec theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Ioi_top
#align upper_set.Ioi_top UpperSet.Ioi_top
@[simp] lemma Ici_ne_top : Ici a ≠ ⊤ := SetLike.coe_ne_coe.1 nonempty_Ici.ne_empty
@[simp] lemma Ici_lt_top : Ici a < ⊤ := lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 Ici_ne_top
@[simp] lemma le_Ici : s ≤ Ici a ↔ a ∈ s := ⟨fun h ↦ h le_rfl, fun ha ↦ s.upper.Ici_subset ha⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
nonrec lemma Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → UpperSet α) := fun _a _b hab ↦
Ici_injective <| congr_arg ((↑) : _ → Set α) hab
@[simp] lemma Ici_inj : Ici a = Ici b ↔ a = b := Ici_injective.eq_iff
lemma Ici_ne_Ici : Ici a ≠ Ici b ↔ a ≠ b := Ici_inj.not
end PartialOrder
@[simp]
theorem Ici_sup [SemilatticeSup α] (a b : α) : Ici (a ⊔ b) = Ici a ⊔ Ici b :=
ext Ici_inter_Ici.symm
#align upper_set.Ici_sup UpperSet.Ici_sup
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_sSup (S : Set α) : Ici (sSup S) = ⨆ a ∈ S, Ici a :=
SetLike.ext fun c => by simp only [mem_Ici_iff, mem_iSup_iff, sSup_le_iff]
#align upper_set.Ici_Sup UpperSet.Ici_sSup
@[simp]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, Ici (f i) :=
SetLike.ext fun c => by simp only [mem_Ici_iff, mem_iSup_iff, iSup_le_iff]
#align upper_set.Ici_supr UpperSet.Ici_iSup
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⨆ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
#align upper_set.Ici_supr₂ UpperSet.Ici_iSup₂
end CompleteLattice
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : LowerSet α} {a b : α}
/-- Principal lower set. `Set.Iic` as a lower set. The smallest lower set containing a given
element. -/
nonrec def Iic (a : α) : LowerSet α :=
⟨Iic a, isLowerSet_Iic a⟩
#align lower_set.Iic LowerSet.Iic
/-- Strict principal lower set. `Set.Iio` as a lower set. -/
nonrec def Iio (a : α) : LowerSet α :=
⟨Iio a, isLowerSet_Iio a⟩
#align lower_set.Iio LowerSet.Iio
@[simp]
theorem coe_Iic (a : α) : ↑(Iic a) = Set.Iic a :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_Iic LowerSet.coe_Iic
@[simp]
theorem coe_Iio (a : α) : ↑(Iio a) = Set.Iio a :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_Iio LowerSet.coe_Iio
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iic_iff : b ∈ Iic a ↔ b ≤ a :=
Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_Iic_iff LowerSet.mem_Iic_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iio_iff : b ∈ Iio a ↔ b < a :=
Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_Iio_iff LowerSet.mem_Iio_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_Iic (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) : map f (Iic a) = Iic (f a) := by
ext
simp
#align lower_set.map_Iic LowerSet.map_Iic
@[simp]
theorem map_Iio (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) : map f (Iio a) = Iio (f a) := by
ext
simp
#align lower_set.map_Iio LowerSet.map_Iio
theorem Ioi_le_Ici (a : α) : Ioi a ≤ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align lower_set.Ioi_le_Ici LowerSet.Ioi_le_Ici
@[simp]
nonrec theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Iic_top
#align lower_set.Iic_top LowerSet.Iic_top
@[simp]
nonrec theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Iio_bot
#align lower_set.Iio_bot LowerSet.Iio_bot
@[simp] lemma Iic_ne_bot : Iic a ≠ ⊥ := SetLike.coe_ne_coe.1 nonempty_Iic.ne_empty
@[simp] lemma bot_lt_Iic : ⊥ < Iic a := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 Iic_ne_bot
@[simp] lemma Iic_le : Iic a ≤ s ↔ a ∈ s := ⟨fun h ↦ h le_rfl, fun ha ↦ s.lower.Iic_subset ha⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
nonrec lemma Iic_injective : Injective (Iic : α → LowerSet α) := fun _a _b hab ↦
Iic_injective <| congr_arg ((↑) : _ → Set α) hab
@[simp] lemma Iic_inj : Iic a = Iic b ↔ a = b := Iic_injective.eq_iff
lemma Iic_ne_Iic : Iic a ≠ Iic b ↔ a ≠ b := Iic_inj.not
end PartialOrder
@[simp]
theorem Iic_inf [SemilatticeInf α] (a b : α) : Iic (a ⊓ b) = Iic a ⊓ Iic b :=
SetLike.coe_injective Iic_inter_Iic.symm
#align lower_set.Iic_inf LowerSet.Iic_inf
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_sInf (S : Set α) : Iic (sInf S) = ⨅ a ∈ S, Iic a :=
SetLike.ext fun c => by simp only [mem_Iic_iff, mem_iInf₂_iff, le_sInf_iff]
#align lower_set.Iic_Inf LowerSet.Iic_sInf
@[simp]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, Iic (f i) :=
SetLike.ext fun c => by simp only [mem_Iic_iff, mem_iInf_iff, le_iInf_iff]
#align lower_set.Iic_infi LowerSet.Iic_iInf
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⨅ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
#align lower_set.Iic_infi₂ LowerSet.Iic_iInf₂
end CompleteLattice
end LowerSet
section closure
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s t : Set α} {x : α}
/-- The greatest upper set containing a given set. -/
def upperClosure (s : Set α) : UpperSet α :=
⟨{ x | ∃ a ∈ s, a ≤ x }, fun _ _ hle h => h.imp fun _x hx => ⟨hx.1, hx.2.trans hle⟩⟩
#align upper_closure upperClosure
/-- The least lower set containing a given set. -/
def lowerClosure (s : Set α) : LowerSet α :=
⟨{ x | ∃ a ∈ s, x ≤ a }, fun _ _ hle h => h.imp fun _x hx => ⟨hx.1, hle.trans hx.2⟩⟩
#align lower_closure lowerClosure
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: move `GaloisInsertion`s up, use them to prove lemmas
@[simp]
theorem mem_upperClosure : x ∈ upperClosure s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_upper_closure mem_upperClosure
@[simp]
theorem mem_lowerClosure : x ∈ lowerClosure s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_lower_closure mem_lowerClosure
-- We do not tag those two as `simp` to respect the abstraction.
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_upperClosure (s : Set α) : ↑(upperClosure s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, Ici a := by
ext
simp
#align coe_upper_closure coe_upperClosure
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_lowerClosure (s : Set α) : ↑(lowerClosure s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, Iic a := by
ext
simp
#align coe_lower_closure coe_lowerClosure
instance instDecidablePredMemUpperClosure [DecidablePred (∃ a ∈ s, a ≤ ·)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ upperClosure s) := ‹DecidablePred _›
instance instDecidablePredMemLowerClosure [DecidablePred (∃ a ∈ s, · ≤ a)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ lowerClosure s) := ‹DecidablePred _›
theorem subset_upperClosure : s ⊆ upperClosure s := fun x hx => ⟨x, hx, le_rfl⟩
#align subset_upper_closure subset_upperClosure
theorem subset_lowerClosure : s ⊆ lowerClosure s := fun x hx => ⟨x, hx, le_rfl⟩
#align subset_lower_closure subset_lowerClosure
theorem upperClosure_min (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : ↑(upperClosure s) ⊆ t :=
fun _a ⟨_b, hb, hba⟩ => ht hba <| h hb
#align upper_closure_min upperClosure_min
theorem lowerClosure_min (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : ↑(lowerClosure s) ⊆ t :=
fun _a ⟨_b, hb, hab⟩ => ht hab <| h hb
#align lower_closure_min lowerClosure_min
protected theorem IsUpperSet.upperClosure (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ↑(upperClosure s) = s :=
(upperClosure_min Subset.rfl hs).antisymm subset_upperClosure
#align is_upper_set.upper_closure IsUpperSet.upperClosure
protected theorem IsLowerSet.lowerClosure (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ↑(lowerClosure s) = s :=
(lowerClosure_min Subset.rfl hs).antisymm subset_lowerClosure
#align is_lower_set.lower_closure IsLowerSet.lowerClosure
@[simp]
protected theorem UpperSet.upperClosure (s : UpperSet α) : upperClosure (s : Set α) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective s.2.upperClosure
#align upper_set.upper_closure UpperSet.upperClosure
@[simp]
protected theorem LowerSet.lowerClosure (s : LowerSet α) : lowerClosure (s : Set α) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective s.2.lowerClosure
#align lower_set.lower_closure LowerSet.lowerClosure
@[simp]
theorem upperClosure_image (f : α ≃o β) :
upperClosure (f '' s) = UpperSet.map f (upperClosure s) := by
rw [← f.symm_symm, ← UpperSet.symm_map, f.symm_symm]
ext
simp [-UpperSet.symm_map, UpperSet.map, OrderIso.symm, ← f.le_symm_apply]
#align upper_closure_image upperClosure_image
@[simp]
theorem lowerClosure_image (f : α ≃o β) :
lowerClosure (f '' s) = LowerSet.map f (lowerClosure s) := by
rw [← f.symm_symm, ← LowerSet.symm_map, f.symm_symm]
ext
simp [-LowerSet.symm_map, LowerSet.map, OrderIso.symm, ← f.symm_apply_le]
#align lower_closure_image lowerClosure_image
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 1,477 | 1,479 | theorem UpperSet.iInf_Ici (s : Set α) : ⨅ a ∈ s, UpperSet.Ici a = upperClosure s := by |
ext
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import algebra.quandle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"28aa996fc6fb4317f0083c4e6daf79878d81be33"
/-!
# Racks and Quandles
This file defines racks and quandles, algebraic structures for sets
that bijectively act on themselves with a self-distributivity
property. If `R` is a rack and `act : R → (R ≃ R)` is the self-action,
then the self-distributivity is, equivalently, that
```
act (act x y) = act x * act y * (act x)⁻¹
```
where multiplication is composition in `R ≃ R` as a group.
Quandles are racks such that `act x x = x` for all `x`.
One example of a quandle (not yet in mathlib) is the action of a Lie
algebra on itself, defined by `act x y = Ad (exp x) y`.
Quandles and racks were independently developed by multiple
mathematicians. David Joyce introduced quandles in his thesis
[Joyce1982] to define an algebraic invariant of knot and link
complements that is analogous to the fundamental group of the
exterior, and he showed that the quandle associated to an oriented
knot is invariant up to orientation-reversed mirror image. Racks were
used by Fenn and Rourke for framed codimension-2 knots and
links in [FennRourke1992]. Unital shelves are discussed in [crans2017].
The name "rack" came from wordplay by Conway and Wraith for the "wrack
and ruin" of forgetting everything but the conjugation operation for a
group.
## Main definitions
* `Shelf` is a type with a self-distributive action
* `UnitalShelf` is a shelf with a left and right unit
* `Rack` is a shelf whose action for each element is invertible
* `Quandle` is a rack whose action for an element fixes that element
* `Quandle.conj` defines a quandle of a group acting on itself by conjugation.
* `ShelfHom` is homomorphisms of shelves, racks, and quandles.
* `Rack.EnvelGroup` gives the universal group the rack maps to as a conjugation quandle.
* `Rack.oppositeRack` gives the rack with the action replaced by its inverse.
## Main statements
* `Rack.EnvelGroup` is left adjoint to `Quandle.Conj` (`toEnvelGroup.map`).
The universality statements are `toEnvelGroup.univ` and `toEnvelGroup.univ_uniq`.
## Implementation notes
"Unital racks" are uninteresting (see `Rack.assoc_iff_id`, `UnitalShelf.assoc`), so we do not
define them.
## Notation
The following notation is localized in `quandles`:
* `x ◃ y` is `Shelf.act x y`
* `x ◃⁻¹ y` is `Rack.inv_act x y`
* `S →◃ S'` is `ShelfHom S S'`
Use `open quandles` to use these.
## Todo
* If `g` is the Lie algebra of a Lie group `G`, then `(x ◃ y) = Ad (exp x) x` forms a quandle.
* If `X` is a symmetric space, then each point has a corresponding involution that acts on `X`,
forming a quandle.
* Alexander quandle with `a ◃ b = t * b + (1 - t) * b`, with `a` and `b` elements
of a module over `Z[t,t⁻¹]`.
* If `G` is a group, `H` a subgroup, and `z` in `H`, then there is a quandle `(G/H;z)` defined by
`yH ◃ xH = yzy⁻¹xH`. Every homogeneous quandle (i.e., a quandle `Q` whose automorphism group acts
transitively on `Q` as a set) is isomorphic to such a quandle.
There is a generalization to this arbitrary quandles in [Joyce's paper (Theorem 7.2)][Joyce1982].
## Tags
rack, quandle
-/
open MulOpposite
universe u v
/-- A *Shelf* is a structure with a self-distributive binary operation.
The binary operation is regarded as a left action of the type on itself.
-/
class Shelf (α : Type u) where
/-- The action of the `Shelf` over `α`-/
act : α → α → α
/-- A verification that `act` is self-distributive-/
self_distrib : ∀ {x y z : α}, act x (act y z) = act (act x y) (act x z)
#align shelf Shelf
/--
A *unital shelf* is a shelf equipped with an element `1` such that, for all elements `x`,
we have both `x ◃ 1` and `1 ◃ x` equal `x`.
-/
class UnitalShelf (α : Type u) extends Shelf α, One α :=
(one_act : ∀ a : α, act 1 a = a)
(act_one : ∀ a : α, act a 1 = a)
#align unital_shelf UnitalShelf
/-- The type of homomorphisms between shelves.
This is also the notion of rack and quandle homomorphisms.
-/
@[ext]
structure ShelfHom (S₁ : Type*) (S₂ : Type*) [Shelf S₁] [Shelf S₂] where
/-- The function under the Shelf Homomorphism -/
toFun : S₁ → S₂
/-- The homomorphism property of a Shelf Homomorphism-/
map_act' : ∀ {x y : S₁}, toFun (Shelf.act x y) = Shelf.act (toFun x) (toFun y)
#align shelf_hom ShelfHom
#align shelf_hom.ext_iff ShelfHom.ext_iff
#align shelf_hom.ext ShelfHom.ext
/-- A *rack* is an automorphic set (a set with an action on itself by
bijections) that is self-distributive. It is a shelf such that each
element's action is invertible.
The notations `x ◃ y` and `x ◃⁻¹ y` denote the action and the
inverse action, respectively, and they are right associative.
-/
class Rack (α : Type u) extends Shelf α where
/-- The inverse actions of the elements -/
invAct : α → α → α
/-- Proof of left inverse -/
left_inv : ∀ x, Function.LeftInverse (invAct x) (act x)
/-- Proof of right inverse -/
right_inv : ∀ x, Function.RightInverse (invAct x) (act x)
#align rack Rack
/-- Action of a Shelf-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃ " => Shelf.act
/-- Inverse Action of a Rack-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃⁻¹ " => Rack.invAct
/-- Shelf Homomorphism-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:25 " →◃ " => ShelfHom
open Quandles
namespace UnitalShelf
open Shelf
variable {S : Type*} [UnitalShelf S]
/--
A monoid is *graphic* if, for all `x` and `y`, the *graphic identity*
`(x * y) * x = x * y` holds. For a unital shelf, this graphic
identity holds.
-/
lemma act_act_self_eq (x y : S) : (x ◃ y) ◃ x = x ◃ y := by
have h : (x ◃ y) ◃ x = (x ◃ y) ◃ (x ◃ 1) := by rw [act_one]
rw [h, ← Shelf.self_distrib, act_one]
#align unital_shelf.act_act_self_eq UnitalShelf.act_act_self_eq
lemma act_idem (x : S) : (x ◃ x) = x := by rw [← act_one x, ← Shelf.self_distrib, act_one]
#align unital_shelf.act_idem UnitalShelf.act_idem
lemma act_self_act_eq (x y : S) : x ◃ (x ◃ y) = x ◃ y := by
have h : x ◃ (x ◃ y) = (x ◃ 1) ◃ (x ◃ y) := by rw [act_one]
rw [h, ← Shelf.self_distrib, one_act]
#align unital_shelf.act_self_act_eq UnitalShelf.act_self_act_eq
/--
The associativity of a unital shelf comes for free.
-/
lemma assoc (x y z : S) : (x ◃ y) ◃ z = x ◃ y ◃ z := by
rw [self_distrib, self_distrib, act_act_self_eq, act_self_act_eq]
#align unital_shelf.assoc UnitalShelf.assoc
end UnitalShelf
namespace Rack
variable {R : Type*} [Rack R]
-- Porting note: No longer a need for `Rack.self_distrib`
export Shelf (self_distrib)
-- porting note, changed name to `act'` to not conflict with `Shelf.act`
/-- A rack acts on itself by equivalences.
-/
def act' (x : R) : R ≃ R where
toFun := Shelf.act x
invFun := invAct x
left_inv := left_inv x
right_inv := right_inv x
#align rack.act Rack.act'
@[simp]
theorem act'_apply (x y : R) : act' x y = x ◃ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_apply Rack.act'_apply
@[simp]
theorem act'_symm_apply (x y : R) : (act' x).symm y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_symm_apply Rack.act'_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_apply (x y : R) : (act' x)⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.inv_act_apply Rack.invAct_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_act_eq (x y : R) : x ◃⁻¹ x ◃ y = y :=
left_inv x y
#align rack.inv_act_act_eq Rack.invAct_act_eq
@[simp]
theorem act_invAct_eq (x y : R) : x ◃ x ◃⁻¹ y = y :=
right_inv x y
#align rack.act_inv_act_eq Rack.act_invAct_eq
theorem left_cancel (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃ y = x ◃ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel Rack.left_cancel
theorem left_cancel_inv (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).symm.injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel_inv Rack.left_cancel_inv
theorem self_distrib_inv {x y z : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y ◃⁻¹ z = (x ◃⁻¹ y) ◃⁻¹ x ◃⁻¹ z := by
rw [← left_cancel (x ◃⁻¹ y), right_inv, ← left_cancel x, right_inv, self_distrib]
repeat' rw [right_inv]
#align rack.self_distrib_inv Rack.self_distrib_inv
/-- The *adjoint action* of a rack on itself is `op'`, and the adjoint
action of `x ◃ y` is the conjugate of the action of `y` by the action
of `x`. It is another way to understand the self-distributivity axiom.
This is used in the natural rack homomorphism `toConj` from `R` to
`Conj (R ≃ R)` defined by `op'`.
-/
theorem ad_conj {R : Type*} [Rack R] (x y : R) : act' (x ◃ y) = act' x * act' y * (act' x)⁻¹ := by
rw [eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]; ext z
apply self_distrib.symm
#align rack.ad_conj Rack.ad_conj
/-- The opposite rack, swapping the roles of `◃` and `◃⁻¹`.
-/
instance oppositeRack : Rack Rᵐᵒᵖ where
act x y := op (invAct (unop x) (unop y))
self_distrib := by
intro x y z
induction x using MulOpposite.rec'
induction y using MulOpposite.rec'
induction z using MulOpposite.rec'
simp only [op_inj, unop_op, op_unop]
rw [self_distrib_inv]
invAct x y := op (Shelf.act (unop x) (unop y))
left_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
right_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
#align rack.opposite_rack Rack.oppositeRack
@[simp]
theorem op_act_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃ op y = op (x ◃⁻¹ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_act_op_eq Rack.op_act_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem op_invAct_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃⁻¹ op y = op (x ◃ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_inv_act_op_eq Rack.op_invAct_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_act_act_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃ x) ◃ y = x ◃ y := by rw [← right_inv x y, ← self_distrib]
#align rack.self_act_act_eq Rack.self_act_act_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_invAct_invAct_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃⁻¹ x) ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y := by
have h := @self_act_act_eq _ _ (op x) (op y)
simpa using h
#align rack.self_inv_act_inv_act_eq Rack.self_invAct_invAct_eq
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Quandle.lean | 293 | 297 | theorem self_act_invAct_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃ x) ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y := by |
rw [← left_cancel (x ◃ x)]
rw [right_inv]
rw [self_act_act_eq]
rw [right_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import algebra.order.group.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b599f4e4e5cf1fbcb4194503671d3d9e569c1fce"
/-!
# Ordered groups
This file develops the basics of ordered groups.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
-/
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive commutative group is an additive commutative group
with a partial order in which addition is strictly monotone. -/
class OrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Addition is monotone in an ordered additive commutative group. -/
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
#align ordered_add_comm_group OrderedAddCommGroup
/-- An ordered commutative group is a commutative group
with a partial order in which multiplication is strictly monotone. -/
class OrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends CommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Multiplication is monotone in an ordered commutative group. -/
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c * a ≤ c * b
#align ordered_comm_group OrderedCommGroup
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance OrderedCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := OrderedCommGroup.mul_le_mul_left b c bc a
#align ordered_comm_group.to_covariant_class_left_le OrderedCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_covariant_class_left_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) OrderedCommGroup.toOrderedCancelCommMonoid [OrderedCommGroup α] :
OrderedCancelCommMonoid α :=
{ ‹OrderedCommGroup α› with le_of_mul_le_mul_left := fun a b c ↦ le_of_mul_le_mul_left' }
#align ordered_comm_group.to_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid OrderedCommGroup.toOrderedCancelCommMonoid
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid OrderedAddCommGroup.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
example (α : Type u) [OrderedAddCommGroup α] : CovariantClass α α (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
IsRightCancelAdd.covariant_swap_add_lt_of_covariant_swap_add_le α
-- Porting note: this instance is not used,
-- and causes timeouts after lean4#2210.
-- It was introduced in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/17564
-- but without the motivation clearly explained.
/-- A choice-free shortcut instance. -/
@[to_additive "A choice-free shortcut instance."]
theorem OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
ContravariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
#align ordered_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_left_le OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_left_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le
-- Porting note: this instance is not used,
-- and causes timeouts after lean4#2210.
-- See further explanation on `OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le`.
/-- A choice-free shortcut instance. -/
@[to_additive "A choice-free shortcut instance."]
theorem OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
ContravariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_right' bc a⁻¹
#align ordered_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_right_le OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_right_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le
section Group
variable [Group α]
section TypeclassesLeftLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.inv_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align left.inv_le_one_iff Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align left.neg_nonpos_iff Left.neg_nonpos_iff
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.one_le_inv_iff : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align left.one_le_inv_iff Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align left.nonneg_neg_iff Left.nonneg_neg_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le : b ≤ a⁻¹ * c ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align le_neg_add_iff_add_le le_neg_add_iff_add_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul : b⁻¹ * a ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left b, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul
#align neg_add_le_iff_le_add neg_add_le_iff_le_add
@[to_additive neg_le_iff_add_nonneg']
theorem inv_le_iff_one_le_mul' : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_left a).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align inv_le_iff_one_le_mul' inv_le_iff_one_le_mul'
#align neg_le_iff_add_nonneg' neg_le_iff_add_nonneg'
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b * a ≤ 1 :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_left b).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left
#align le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_left le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_left
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_mul_iff_le : 1 ≤ b⁻¹ * a ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left b, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align le_inv_mul_iff_le le_inv_mul_iff_le
#align le_neg_add_iff_le le_neg_add_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ * b ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a :=
-- Porting note: why is the `_root_` needed?
_root_.trans inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul <| by rw [mul_one]
#align inv_mul_le_one_iff inv_mul_le_one_iff
#align neg_add_nonpos_iff neg_add_nonpos_iff
end TypeclassesLeftLE
section TypeclassesLeftLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) Left.neg_pos_iff "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.one_lt_inv_iff : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
#align left.one_lt_inv_iff Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align left.neg_pos_iff Left.neg_pos_iff
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.inv_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
#align left.inv_lt_one_iff Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align left.neg_neg_iff Left.neg_neg_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt : b < a⁻¹ * c ↔ a * b < c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_neg_add_iff_add_lt lt_neg_add_iff_add_lt
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul : b⁻¹ * a < c ↔ a < b * c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left b, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul' : a⁻¹ < b ↔ 1 < a * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left a).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul' inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul'
#align neg_lt_iff_pos_add' neg_lt_iff_pos_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one' : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b * a < 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left b).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one' lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one'
#align lt_neg_iff_add_neg' lt_neg_iff_add_neg'
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_mul_iff_lt : 1 < b⁻¹ * a ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left b, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align lt_inv_mul_iff_lt lt_inv_mul_iff_lt
#align lt_neg_add_iff_lt lt_neg_add_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ * b < 1 ↔ b < a :=
_root_.trans inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul <| by rw [mul_one]
#align inv_mul_lt_one_iff inv_mul_lt_one_iff
#align neg_add_neg_iff neg_add_neg_iff
end TypeclassesLeftLT
section TypeclassesRightLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.inv_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right a]
simp
#align right.inv_le_one_iff Right.inv_le_one_iff
#align right.neg_nonpos_iff Right.neg_nonpos_iff
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.one_le_inv_iff : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right a]
simp
#align right.one_le_inv_iff Right.one_le_inv_iff
#align right.nonneg_neg_iff Right.nonneg_neg_iff
@[to_additive neg_le_iff_add_nonneg]
theorem inv_le_iff_one_le_mul : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ b * a :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right a).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align inv_le_iff_one_le_mul inv_le_iff_one_le_mul
#align neg_le_iff_add_nonneg neg_le_iff_add_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right
#align le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul
#align add_neg_le_iff_le_add add_neg_le_iff_le_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le : c ≤ a * b⁻¹ ↔ c * b ≤ a :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le
#align le_add_neg_iff_add_le le_add_neg_iff_add_le
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_one_iff_le : a * b⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul.trans <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_le_one_iff_le mul_inv_le_one_iff_le
#align add_neg_nonpos_iff_le add_neg_nonpos_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_inv_iff_le : 1 ≤ a * b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_mul_inv_iff_le le_mul_inv_iff_le
#align le_add_neg_iff_le le_add_neg_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_one_iff : b * a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a :=
_root_.trans mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_le_one_iff mul_inv_le_one_iff
#align add_neg_nonpos_iff add_neg_nonpos_iff
end TypeclassesRightLE
section TypeclassesRightLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.inv_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right a, inv_mul_self, one_mul]
#align right.inv_lt_one_iff Right.inv_lt_one_iff
#align right.neg_neg_iff Right.neg_neg_iff
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) Right.neg_pos_iff "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.one_lt_inv_iff : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right a, inv_mul_self, one_mul]
#align right.one_lt_inv_iff Right.one_lt_inv_iff
#align right.neg_pos_iff Right.neg_pos_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul : a⁻¹ < b ↔ 1 < b * a :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right a).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul
#align neg_lt_iff_pos_add neg_lt_iff_pos_add
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one : a < b⁻¹ ↔ a * b < 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one
#align lt_neg_iff_add_neg lt_neg_iff_add_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul : a * b⁻¹ < c ↔ a < c * b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt : c < a * b⁻¹ ↔ c * b < a :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt : a * b⁻¹ < 1 ↔ a < b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, inv_mul_cancel_right, one_mul]
#align inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt
#align neg_add_neg_iff_lt neg_add_neg_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_inv_iff_lt : 1 < a * b⁻¹ ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align lt_mul_inv_iff_lt lt_mul_inv_iff_lt
#align lt_add_neg_iff_lt lt_add_neg_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_one_iff : b * a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ b < a :=
_root_.trans mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_lt_one_iff mul_inv_lt_one_iff
#align add_neg_neg_iff add_neg_neg_iff
end TypeclassesRightLT
section TypeclassesLeftRightLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)]
{a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_inv_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a, ← mul_le_mul_iff_right b]
simp
#align inv_le_inv_iff inv_le_inv_iff
#align neg_le_neg_iff neg_le_neg_iff
alias ⟨le_of_neg_le_neg, _⟩ := neg_le_neg_iff
#align le_of_neg_le_neg le_of_neg_le_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff : a * b⁻¹ ≤ d⁻¹ * c ↔ d * a ≤ c * b := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left d, ← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff
#align add_neg_le_neg_add_iff add_neg_le_neg_add_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_le_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a / b ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ b := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_le_self_iff div_le_self_iff
#align sub_le_self_iff sub_le_self_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_div_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ 1 := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align le_div_self_iff le_div_self_iff
#align le_sub_self_iff le_sub_self_iff
alias ⟨_, sub_le_self⟩ := sub_le_self_iff
#align sub_le_self sub_le_self
end TypeclassesLeftRightLE
section TypeclassesLeftRightLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)]
{a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_inv_iff : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, ← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b]
simp
#align inv_lt_inv_iff inv_lt_inv_iff
#align neg_lt_neg_iff neg_lt_neg_iff
@[to_additive neg_lt]
theorem inv_lt' : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by rw [← inv_lt_inv_iff, inv_inv]
#align inv_lt' inv_lt'
#align neg_lt neg_lt
@[to_additive lt_neg]
theorem lt_inv' : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_lt_inv_iff, inv_inv]
#align lt_inv' lt_inv'
#align lt_neg lt_neg
alias ⟨lt_inv_of_lt_inv, _⟩ := lt_inv'
#align lt_inv_of_lt_inv lt_inv_of_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive] lt_inv_of_lt_inv
#align lt_neg_of_lt_neg lt_neg_of_lt_neg
alias ⟨inv_lt_of_inv_lt', _⟩ := inv_lt'
#align inv_lt_of_inv_lt' inv_lt_of_inv_lt'
attribute [to_additive neg_lt_of_neg_lt] inv_lt_of_inv_lt'
#align neg_lt_of_neg_lt neg_lt_of_neg_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff : a * b⁻¹ < d⁻¹ * c ↔ d * a < c * b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left d, ← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff
#align add_neg_lt_neg_add_iff add_neg_lt_neg_add_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_lt_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a / b < a ↔ 1 < b := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_lt_self_iff div_lt_self_iff
#align sub_lt_self_iff sub_lt_self_iff
alias ⟨_, sub_lt_self⟩ := sub_lt_self_iff
#align sub_lt_self sub_lt_self
end TypeclassesLeftRightLT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LeftLE
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.inv_le_self (h : 1 ≤ a) : a⁻¹ ≤ a :=
le_trans (Left.inv_le_one_iff.mpr h) h
#align left.inv_le_self Left.inv_le_self
#align left.neg_le_self Left.neg_le_self
alias neg_le_self := Left.neg_le_self
#align neg_le_self neg_le_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.self_le_inv (h : a ≤ 1) : a ≤ a⁻¹ :=
le_trans h (Left.one_le_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align left.self_le_inv Left.self_le_inv
#align left.self_le_neg Left.self_le_neg
end LeftLE
section LeftLT
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.inv_lt_self (h : 1 < a) : a⁻¹ < a :=
(Left.inv_lt_one_iff.mpr h).trans h
#align left.inv_lt_self Left.inv_lt_self
#align left.neg_lt_self Left.neg_lt_self
alias neg_lt_self := Left.neg_lt_self
#align neg_lt_self neg_lt_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.self_lt_inv (h : a < 1) : a < a⁻¹ :=
lt_trans h (Left.one_lt_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align left.self_lt_inv Left.self_lt_inv
#align left.self_lt_neg Left.self_lt_neg
end LeftLT
section RightLE
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.inv_le_self (h : 1 ≤ a) : a⁻¹ ≤ a :=
le_trans (Right.inv_le_one_iff.mpr h) h
#align right.inv_le_self Right.inv_le_self
#align right.neg_le_self Right.neg_le_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.self_le_inv (h : a ≤ 1) : a ≤ a⁻¹ :=
le_trans h (Right.one_le_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align right.self_le_inv Right.self_le_inv
#align right.self_le_neg Right.self_le_neg
end RightLE
section RightLT
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.inv_lt_self (h : 1 < a) : a⁻¹ < a :=
(Right.inv_lt_one_iff.mpr h).trans h
#align right.inv_lt_self Right.inv_lt_self
#align right.neg_lt_self Right.neg_lt_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.self_lt_inv (h : a < 1) : a < a⁻¹ :=
lt_trans h (Right.one_lt_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align right.self_lt_inv Right.self_lt_inv
#align right.self_lt_neg Right.self_lt_neg
end RightLT
end Preorder
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α]
section LE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul' : c⁻¹ * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b * c := by rw [inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul' inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul'
#align neg_add_le_iff_le_add' neg_add_le_iff_le_add'
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `a ≤ c * b`
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul' : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul' mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul'
#align add_neg_le_iff_le_add' add_neg_le_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive add_neg_le_add_neg_iff]
theorem mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff' : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c * d⁻¹ ↔ a * d ≤ c * b := by
rw [mul_comm c, mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff' mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff'
#align add_neg_le_add_neg_iff add_neg_le_add_neg_iff
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul' : c⁻¹ * a < b ↔ a < b * c := by rw [inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul' inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul'
#align neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add' neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add'
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `a < c * b`
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul' : a * b⁻¹ < c ↔ a < b * c := by
rw [← inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul' mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul'
#align add_neg_lt_iff_le_add' add_neg_lt_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff]
theorem mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff' : a * b⁻¹ < c * d⁻¹ ↔ a * d < c * b := by
rw [mul_comm c, mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff' mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff'
#align add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff
end LT
end CommGroup
alias ⟨one_le_of_inv_le_one, _⟩ := Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align one_le_of_inv_le_one one_le_of_inv_le_one
attribute [to_additive] one_le_of_inv_le_one
#align nonneg_of_neg_nonpos nonneg_of_neg_nonpos
alias ⟨le_one_of_one_le_inv, _⟩ := Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align le_one_of_one_le_inv le_one_of_one_le_inv
attribute [to_additive nonpos_of_neg_nonneg] le_one_of_one_le_inv
#align nonpos_of_neg_nonneg nonpos_of_neg_nonneg
alias ⟨lt_of_inv_lt_inv, _⟩ := inv_lt_inv_iff
#align lt_of_inv_lt_inv lt_of_inv_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive] lt_of_inv_lt_inv
#align lt_of_neg_lt_neg lt_of_neg_lt_neg
alias ⟨one_lt_of_inv_lt_one, _⟩ := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align one_lt_of_inv_lt_one one_lt_of_inv_lt_one
attribute [to_additive] one_lt_of_inv_lt_one
#align pos_of_neg_neg pos_of_neg_neg
alias inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt
attribute [to_additive] inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt
#align neg_neg_iff_pos neg_neg_iff_pos
alias inv_lt_one' := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align inv_lt_one' inv_lt_one'
attribute [to_additive neg_lt_zero] inv_lt_one'
#align neg_lt_zero neg_lt_zero
alias ⟨inv_of_one_lt_inv, _⟩ := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align inv_of_one_lt_inv inv_of_one_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_of_neg_pos] inv_of_one_lt_inv
#align neg_of_neg_pos neg_of_neg_pos
alias ⟨_, one_lt_inv_of_inv⟩ := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align one_lt_inv_of_inv one_lt_inv_of_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_pos_of_neg] one_lt_inv_of_inv
#align neg_pos_of_neg neg_pos_of_neg
alias ⟨mul_le_of_le_inv_mul, _⟩ := le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align mul_le_of_le_inv_mul mul_le_of_le_inv_mul
attribute [to_additive] mul_le_of_le_inv_mul
#align add_le_of_le_neg_add add_le_of_le_neg_add
alias ⟨_, le_inv_mul_of_mul_le⟩ := le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align le_inv_mul_of_mul_le le_inv_mul_of_mul_le
attribute [to_additive] le_inv_mul_of_mul_le
#align le_neg_add_of_add_le le_neg_add_of_add_le
alias ⟨_, inv_mul_le_of_le_mul⟩ := inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul
#align inv_mul_le_of_le_mul inv_mul_le_of_le_mul
-- Porting note: was `inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul`
attribute [to_additive] inv_mul_le_of_le_mul
alias ⟨mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul, _⟩ := lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul
attribute [to_additive] mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul
#align add_lt_of_lt_neg_add add_lt_of_lt_neg_add
alias ⟨_, lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt⟩ := lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt
attribute [to_additive] lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt
#align lt_neg_add_of_add_lt lt_neg_add_of_add_lt
alias ⟨lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt, inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul⟩ := inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul
attribute [to_additive] lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align lt_add_of_neg_add_lt lt_add_of_neg_add_lt
attribute [to_additive] inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul
#align neg_add_lt_of_lt_add neg_add_lt_of_lt_add
alias lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left := lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left
attribute [to_additive] lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left
#align lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left
alias inv_le_one' := Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align inv_le_one' inv_le_one'
attribute [to_additive neg_nonpos] inv_le_one'
#align neg_nonpos neg_nonpos
alias one_le_inv' := Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align one_le_inv' one_le_inv'
attribute [to_additive neg_nonneg] one_le_inv'
#align neg_nonneg neg_nonneg
alias one_lt_inv' := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align one_lt_inv' one_lt_inv'
attribute [to_additive neg_pos] one_lt_inv'
#align neg_pos neg_pos
alias OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' := mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.mul_lt_mul_left' OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left] OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_add_comm_group.add_lt_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.le_of_mul_le_mul_left OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
#align ordered_add_comm_group.le_of_add_le_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.le_of_add_le_add_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
#align ordered_add_comm_group.lt_of_add_lt_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.lt_of_add_lt_add_left
-- Most of the lemmas that are primed in this section appear in ordered_field.
-- I (DT) did not try to minimise the assumptions.
section Group
variable [Group α] [LE α]
section Right
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_div_iff_right (c : α) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_le_mul_iff_right _
#align div_le_div_iff_right div_le_div_iff_right
#align sub_le_sub_iff_right sub_le_sub_iff_right
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub_right]
theorem div_le_div_right' (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
(div_le_div_iff_right c).2 h
#align div_le_div_right' div_le_div_right'
#align sub_le_sub_right sub_le_sub_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sub_nonneg]
theorem one_le_div' : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align one_le_div' one_le_div'
#align sub_nonneg sub_nonneg
alias ⟨le_of_sub_nonneg, sub_nonneg_of_le⟩ := sub_nonneg
#align sub_nonneg_of_le sub_nonneg_of_le
#align le_of_sub_nonneg le_of_sub_nonneg
@[to_additive sub_nonpos]
theorem div_le_one' : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_le_one' div_le_one'
#align sub_nonpos sub_nonpos
alias ⟨le_of_sub_nonpos, sub_nonpos_of_le⟩ := sub_nonpos
#align sub_nonpos_of_le sub_nonpos_of_le
#align le_of_sub_nonpos le_of_sub_nonpos
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le : a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_div_iff_mul_le le_div_iff_mul_le
#align le_sub_iff_add_le le_sub_iff_add_le
alias ⟨add_le_of_le_sub_right, le_sub_right_of_add_le⟩ := le_sub_iff_add_le
#align add_le_of_le_sub_right add_le_of_le_sub_right
#align le_sub_right_of_add_le le_sub_right_of_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_iff_le_mul : a / c ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right c, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_le_iff_le_mul div_le_iff_le_mul
#align sub_le_iff_le_add sub_le_iff_le_add
-- Note: we intentionally don't have `@[simp]` for the additive version,
-- since the LHS simplifies with `tsub_le_iff_right`
attribute [simp] div_le_iff_le_mul
-- TODO: Should we get rid of `sub_le_iff_le_add` in favor of
-- (a renamed version of) `tsub_le_iff_right`?
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) AddGroup.toHasOrderedSub {α : Type*} [AddGroup α] [LE α]
[CovariantClass α α (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·)] : OrderedSub α :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => sub_le_iff_le_add⟩
#align add_group.to_has_ordered_sub AddGroup.toHasOrderedSub
end Right
section Left
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)]
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_div_iff_left (a : α) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_le_mul_iff_left a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_left,
inv_mul_cancel_left, inv_le_inv_iff]
#align div_le_div_iff_left div_le_div_iff_left
#align sub_le_sub_iff_left sub_le_sub_iff_left
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub_left]
theorem div_le_div_left' (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
(div_le_div_iff_left c).2 h
#align div_le_div_left' div_le_div_left'
#align sub_le_sub_left sub_le_sub_left
end Left
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α]
section LE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive sub_le_sub_iff]
theorem div_le_div_iff' : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff'
#align div_le_div_iff' div_le_div_iff'
#align sub_le_sub_iff sub_le_sub_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le' : b ≤ c / a ↔ a * b ≤ c := by rw [le_div_iff_mul_le, mul_comm]
#align le_div_iff_mul_le' le_div_iff_mul_le'
#align le_sub_iff_add_le' le_sub_iff_add_le'
alias ⟨add_le_of_le_sub_left, le_sub_left_of_add_le⟩ := le_sub_iff_add_le'
#align le_sub_left_of_add_le le_sub_left_of_add_le
#align add_le_of_le_sub_left add_le_of_le_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_iff_le_mul' : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by rw [div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align div_le_iff_le_mul' div_le_iff_le_mul'
#align sub_le_iff_le_add' sub_le_iff_le_add'
alias ⟨le_add_of_sub_left_le, sub_left_le_of_le_add⟩ := sub_le_iff_le_add'
#align sub_left_le_of_le_add sub_left_le_of_le_add
#align le_add_of_sub_left_le le_add_of_sub_left_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_div_iff_le_mul : b⁻¹ ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ a * b :=
le_div_iff_mul_le.trans inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul'
#align inv_le_div_iff_le_mul inv_le_div_iff_le_mul
#align neg_le_sub_iff_le_add neg_le_sub_iff_le_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_div_iff_le_mul' : a⁻¹ ≤ b / c ↔ c ≤ a * b := by rw [inv_le_div_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_le_div_iff_le_mul' inv_le_div_iff_le_mul'
#align neg_le_sub_iff_le_add' neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_comm : a / b ≤ c ↔ a / c ≤ b :=
div_le_iff_le_mul'.trans div_le_iff_le_mul.symm
#align div_le_comm div_le_comm
#align sub_le_comm sub_le_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_comm : a ≤ b / c ↔ c ≤ b / a :=
le_div_iff_mul_le'.trans le_div_iff_mul_le.symm
#align le_div_comm le_div_comm
#align le_sub_comm le_sub_comm
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub]
theorem div_le_div'' (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a / d ≤ b / c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm b, mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
exact mul_le_mul' hab hcd
#align div_le_div'' div_le_div''
#align sub_le_sub sub_le_sub
end Preorder
end CommGroup
-- Most of the lemmas that are primed in this section appear in ordered_field.
-- I (DT) did not try to minimise the assumptions.
section Group
variable [Group α] [LT α]
section Right
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_lt_div_iff_right (c : α) : a / c < b / c ↔ a < b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_lt_mul_iff_right _
#align div_lt_div_iff_right div_lt_div_iff_right
#align sub_lt_sub_iff_right sub_lt_sub_iff_right
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_lt_sub_right]
theorem div_lt_div_right' (h : a < b) (c : α) : a / c < b / c :=
(div_lt_div_iff_right c).2 h
#align div_lt_div_right' div_lt_div_right'
#align sub_lt_sub_right sub_lt_sub_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sub_pos]
theorem one_lt_div' : 1 < a / b ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align one_lt_div' one_lt_div'
#align sub_pos sub_pos
alias ⟨lt_of_sub_pos, sub_pos_of_lt⟩ := sub_pos
#align lt_of_sub_pos lt_of_sub_pos
#align sub_pos_of_lt sub_pos_of_lt
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sub_neg "For `a - -b = a + b`, see `sub_neg_eq_add`."]
theorem div_lt_one' : a / b < 1 ↔ a < b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_lt_one' div_lt_one'
#align sub_neg sub_neg
alias ⟨lt_of_sub_neg, sub_neg_of_lt⟩ := sub_neg
#align lt_of_sub_neg lt_of_sub_neg
#align sub_neg_of_lt sub_neg_of_lt
alias sub_lt_zero := sub_neg
#align sub_lt_zero sub_lt_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt : a < c / b ↔ a * b < c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align lt_div_iff_mul_lt lt_div_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_sub_iff_add_lt lt_sub_iff_add_lt
alias ⟨add_lt_of_lt_sub_right, lt_sub_right_of_add_lt⟩ := lt_sub_iff_add_lt
#align add_lt_of_lt_sub_right add_lt_of_lt_sub_right
#align lt_sub_right_of_add_lt lt_sub_right_of_add_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul : a / c < b ↔ a < b * c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right c, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_lt_iff_lt_mul div_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align sub_lt_iff_lt_add sub_lt_iff_lt_add
alias ⟨lt_add_of_sub_right_lt, sub_right_lt_of_lt_add⟩ := sub_lt_iff_lt_add
#align lt_add_of_sub_right_lt lt_add_of_sub_right_lt
#align sub_right_lt_of_lt_add sub_right_lt_of_lt_add
end Right
section Left
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)]
{a b c : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_lt_div_iff_left (a : α) : a / b < a / c ↔ c < b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_left,
inv_mul_cancel_left, inv_lt_inv_iff]
#align div_lt_div_iff_left div_lt_div_iff_left
#align sub_lt_sub_iff_left sub_lt_sub_iff_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul : a⁻¹ < b / c ↔ c < a * b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt, inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul]
#align inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul
#align neg_lt_sub_iff_lt_add neg_lt_sub_iff_lt_add
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_lt_sub_left]
theorem div_lt_div_left' (h : a < b) (c : α) : c / b < c / a :=
(div_lt_div_iff_left c).2 h
#align div_lt_div_left' div_lt_div_left'
#align sub_lt_sub_left sub_lt_sub_left
end Left
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α]
section LT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive sub_lt_sub_iff]
theorem div_lt_div_iff' : a / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff'
#align div_lt_div_iff' div_lt_div_iff'
#align sub_lt_sub_iff sub_lt_sub_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt' : b < c / a ↔ a * b < c := by rw [lt_div_iff_mul_lt, mul_comm]
#align lt_div_iff_mul_lt' lt_div_iff_mul_lt'
#align lt_sub_iff_add_lt' lt_sub_iff_add_lt'
alias ⟨add_lt_of_lt_sub_left, lt_sub_left_of_add_lt⟩ := lt_sub_iff_add_lt'
#align lt_sub_left_of_add_lt lt_sub_left_of_add_lt
#align add_lt_of_lt_sub_left add_lt_of_lt_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul' : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c := by rw [div_lt_iff_lt_mul, mul_comm]
#align div_lt_iff_lt_mul' div_lt_iff_lt_mul'
#align sub_lt_iff_lt_add' sub_lt_iff_lt_add'
alias ⟨lt_add_of_sub_left_lt, sub_left_lt_of_lt_add⟩ := sub_lt_iff_lt_add'
#align lt_add_of_sub_left_lt lt_add_of_sub_left_lt
#align sub_left_lt_of_lt_add sub_left_lt_of_lt_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul' : b⁻¹ < a / c ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_div_iff_mul_lt.trans inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul'
#align inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul' inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul'
#align neg_lt_sub_iff_lt_add' neg_lt_sub_iff_lt_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_comm : a / b < c ↔ a / c < b :=
div_lt_iff_lt_mul'.trans div_lt_iff_lt_mul.symm
#align div_lt_comm div_lt_comm
#align sub_lt_comm sub_lt_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_div_comm : a < b / c ↔ c < b / a :=
lt_div_iff_mul_lt'.trans lt_div_iff_mul_lt.symm
#align lt_div_comm lt_div_comm
#align lt_sub_comm lt_sub_comm
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_lt_sub]
theorem div_lt_div'' (hab : a < b) (hcd : c < d) : a / d < b / c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm b, mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt hab hcd
#align div_lt_div'' div_lt_div''
#align sub_lt_sub sub_lt_sub
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma lt_or_lt_of_div_lt_div : a / d < b / c → a < b ∨ c < d := by
contrapose!; exact fun h ↦ div_le_div'' h.1 h.2
end LinearOrder
end CommGroup
section LinearOrder
variable [Group α] [LinearOrder α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) cmp_sub_zero]
theorem cmp_div_one' [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] (a b : α) :
cmp (a / b) 1 = cmp a b := by rw [← cmp_mul_right' _ _ b, one_mul, div_mul_cancel]
#align cmp_div_one' cmp_div_one'
#align cmp_sub_zero cmp_sub_zero
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)]
section VariableNames
variable {a b c : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_forall_one_lt_lt_mul (h : ∀ ε : α, 1 < ε → a < b * ε) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_not_lt fun h₁ => lt_irrefl a (by simpa using h _ (lt_inv_mul_iff_lt.mpr h₁))
#align le_of_forall_one_lt_lt_mul le_of_forall_one_lt_lt_mul
#align le_of_forall_pos_lt_add le_of_forall_pos_lt_add
@[to_additive]
theorem le_iff_forall_one_lt_lt_mul : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ ε, 1 < ε → a < b * ε :=
⟨fun h _ => lt_mul_of_le_of_one_lt h, le_of_forall_one_lt_lt_mul⟩
#align le_iff_forall_one_lt_lt_mul le_iff_forall_one_lt_lt_mul
#align le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add
/- I (DT) introduced this lemma to prove (the additive version `sub_le_sub_flip` of)
`div_le_div_flip` below. Now I wonder what is the point of either of these lemmas... -/
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_inv_mul_iff [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] :
a / b ≤ a⁻¹ * b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff]
exact
⟨fun h => not_lt.mp fun k => not_lt.mpr h (mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt k k), fun h =>
mul_le_mul' h h⟩
#align div_le_inv_mul_iff div_le_inv_mul_iff
#align sub_le_neg_add_iff sub_le_neg_add_iff
-- What is the point of this lemma? See comment about `div_le_inv_mul_iff` above.
-- Note: we intentionally don't have `@[simp]` for the additive version,
-- since the LHS simplifies with `tsub_le_iff_right`
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_div_flip {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α]
[CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b : α} : a / b ≤ b / a ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv b, mul_comm]
exact div_le_inv_mul_iff
#align div_le_div_flip div_le_div_flip
#align sub_le_sub_flip sub_le_sub_flip
end VariableNames
end LinearOrder
/-!
### Linearly ordered commutative groups
-/
/-- A linearly ordered additive commutative group is an
additive commutative group with a linear order in which
addition is monotone. -/
class LinearOrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedAddCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
#align linear_ordered_add_comm_group LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
/-- A linearly ordered commutative group with an additively absorbing `⊤` element.
Instances should include number systems with an infinite element adjoined. -/
class LinearOrderedAddCommGroupWithTop (α : Type*) extends LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop α,
SubNegMonoid α, Nontrivial α where
protected neg_top : -(⊤ : α) = ⊤
protected add_neg_cancel : ∀ a : α, a ≠ ⊤ → a + -a = 0
#align linear_ordered_add_comm_group_with_top LinearOrderedAddCommGroupWithTop
/-- A linearly ordered commutative group is a
commutative group with a linear order in which
multiplication is monotone. -/
@[to_additive]
class LinearOrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
#align linear_ordered_comm_group LinearOrderedCommGroup
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [LinearOrderedCommGroup α] {a b c : α}
@[to_additive LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left]
theorem LinearOrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' (a b : α) (h : a < b) (c : α) : c * a < c * b :=
_root_.mul_lt_mul_left' h c
#align linear_ordered_comm_group.mul_lt_mul_left' LinearOrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
#align linear_ordered_add_comm_group.add_lt_add_left LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_neg_eq]
theorem eq_one_of_inv_eq' (h : a⁻¹ = a) : a = 1 :=
match lt_trichotomy a 1 with
| Or.inl h₁ =>
have : 1 < a := h ▸ one_lt_inv_of_inv h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
| Or.inr (Or.inl h₁) => h₁
| Or.inr (Or.inr h₁) =>
have : a < 1 := h ▸ inv_lt_one'.mpr h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
#align eq_one_of_inv_eq' eq_one_of_inv_eq'
#align eq_zero_of_neg_eq eq_zero_of_neg_eq
@[to_additive exists_zero_lt]
theorem exists_one_lt' [Nontrivial α] : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Decidable.exists_ne (1 : α)
obtain h|h := hy.lt_or_lt
· exact ⟨y⁻¹, one_lt_inv'.mpr h⟩
· exact ⟨y, h⟩
#align exists_one_lt' exists_one_lt'
#align exists_zero_lt exists_zero_lt
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMaxOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMaxOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a * y, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' a hy⟩⟩
#align linear_ordered_comm_group.to_no_max_order LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMaxOrder
#align linear_ordered_add_comm_group.to_no_max_order LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.to_noMaxOrder
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMinOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMinOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a / y, (div_lt_self_iff a).mpr hy⟩⟩
#align linear_ordered_comm_group.to_no_min_order LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMinOrder
#align linear_ordered_add_comm_group.to_no_min_order LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.to_noMinOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.toLinearOrderedCancelCommMonoid
[LinearOrderedCommGroup α] : LinearOrderedCancelCommMonoid α :=
{ ‹LinearOrderedCommGroup α›, OrderedCommGroup.toOrderedCancelCommMonoid with }
#align linear_ordered_comm_group.to_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid LinearOrderedCommGroup.toLinearOrderedCancelCommMonoid
#align linear_ordered_add_comm_group.to_linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.toLinearOrderedAddCancelCommMonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Defs.lean | 1,173 | 1,173 | theorem inv_le_self_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by | simp [inv_le_iff_one_le_mul']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Init.Logic
import Mathlib.Init.Function
import Mathlib.Init.Algebra.Classes
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Basic
#align_import logic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3365b20c2ffa7c35e47e5209b89ba9abdddf3ffe"
#align_import init.ite_simp from "leanprover-community/lean"@"4a03bdeb31b3688c31d02d7ff8e0ff2e5d6174db"
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
attribute [local instance 10] Classical.propDecidable
section Miscellany
-- Porting note: the following `inline` attributes have been omitted,
-- on the assumption that this issue has been dealt with properly in Lean 4.
-- /- We add the `inline` attribute to optimize VM computation using these declarations.
-- For example, `if p ∧ q then ... else ...` will not evaluate the decidability
-- of `q` if `p` is false. -/
-- attribute [inline]
-- And.decidable Or.decidable Decidable.false Xor.decidable Iff.decidable Decidable.true
-- Implies.decidable Not.decidable Ne.decidable Bool.decidableEq Decidable.toBool
attribute [simp] cast_eq cast_heq imp_false
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
#align hidden hidden
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
#align decidable_eq_of_subsingleton decidableEq_of_subsingleton
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
#align pempty PEmpty
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
#align congr_heq congr_heq
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
#align congr_arg_heq congr_arg_heq
theorem ULift.down_injective {α : Sort _} : Function.Injective (@ULift.down α)
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩, _ => by congr
#align ulift.down_injective ULift.down_injective
@[simp] theorem ULift.down_inj {α : Sort _} {a b : ULift α} : a.down = b.down ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ULift.down_injective h, fun h ↦ by rw [h]⟩
#align ulift.down_inj ULift.down_inj
theorem PLift.down_injective : Function.Injective (@PLift.down α)
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩, _ => by congr
#align plift.down_injective PLift.down_injective
@[simp] theorem PLift.down_inj {a b : PLift α} : a.down = b.down ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ PLift.down_injective h, fun h ↦ by rw [h]⟩
#align plift.down_inj PLift.down_inj
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
#align eq_iff_eq_cancel_left eq_iff_eq_cancel_left
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
#align eq_iff_eq_cancel_right eq_iff_eq_cancel_right
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
#align ne_and_eq_iff_right ne_and_eq_iff_right
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
#align fact Fact
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
#align fact_iff fact_iff
#align fact.elim Fact.elim
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
#align function.swap₂ Function.swap₂
-- Porting note: these don't work as intended any more
-- /-- If `x : α . tac_name` then `x.out : α`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
-- nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
-- argument to `simp`. -/
-- def autoParam'.out {α : Sort*} {n : Name} (x : autoParam' α n) : α := x
-- /-- If `x : α := d` then `x.out : α`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
-- nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
-- argument to `simp`. -/
-- def optParam.out {α : Sort*} {d : α} (x : α := d) : α := x
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
instance : IsRefl Prop Iff := ⟨Iff.refl⟩
instance : IsTrans Prop Iff := ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ Iff.trans⟩
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
#align iff.imp Iff.imp
#align eq_true_eq_id eq_true_eq_id
#align imp_and_distrib imp_and
#align imp_iff_right imp_iff_rightₓ -- reorder implicits
#align imp_iff_not imp_iff_notₓ -- reorder implicits
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b := Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
#align imp_iff_right_iff imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c := Decidable.and_or_imp
#align and_or_imp and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
#align function.mt Function.mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
#align dec_em dec_em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
#align dec_em' dec_em'
alias em := Classical.em
#align em em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
#align em' em'
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
#align or_not or_not
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
#align decidable.eq_or_ne Decidable.eq_or_ne
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
#align decidable.ne_or_eq Decidable.ne_or_eq
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
#align eq_or_ne eq_or_ne
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
#align ne_or_eq ne_or_eq
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p := Decidable.by_contradiction
#align classical.by_contradiction by_contradiction
#align by_contradiction by_contradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
#align classical.by_cases by_cases
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
#align by_contra by_contra
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
#align not_not Classical.not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
#align of_not_not of_not_not
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
#align not_ne_iff not_ne_iff
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := Decidable.of_not_imp
#align of_not_imp of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
#align not.decidable_imp_symm Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := Not.decidable_imp_symm
#align not.imp_symm Not.imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := Decidable.not_imp_comm
#align not_imp_comm not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := Decidable.not_imp_self
#align not_imp_self not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c := ⟨Function.swap, Function.swap⟩
#align imp.swap Imp.swap
alias Iff.not := not_congr
#align iff.not Iff.not
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
#align iff.not_left Iff.not_left
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
#align iff.not_right Iff.not_right
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
#align iff.ne Iff.ne
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
#align iff.ne_left Iff.ne_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
#align iff.ne_right Iff.ne_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Xor']
#align xor_true xor_true
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
#align xor_false xor_false
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
#align xor_comm xor_comm
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
#align xor_self xor_self
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
#align xor_not_left xor_not_left
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
#align xor_not_right xor_not_right
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
#align xor_not_not xor_not_not
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
#align xor.or Xor'.or
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
#align iff.and Iff.and
#align and_congr_left and_congr_leftₓ -- reorder implicits
#align and_congr_right' and_congr_right'ₓ -- reorder implicits
#align and.right_comm and_right_comm
#align and_and_distrib_left and_and_left
#align and_and_distrib_right and_and_right
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
#align and.rotate And.rotate
#align and.congr_right_iff and_congr_right_iff
#align and.congr_left_iff and_congr_left_iffₓ -- reorder implicits
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
#align iff.or Iff.or
#align or_congr_left' or_congr_left
#align or_congr_right' or_congr_rightₓ -- reorder implicits
#align or.right_comm or_right_comm
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
#align or.rotate Or.rotate
@[deprecated Or.imp]
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_of_imp {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a ∨ b) (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → d) :
c ∨ d :=
Or.imp h₂ h₃ h₁
#align or_of_or_of_imp_of_imp or_of_or_of_imp_of_imp
@[deprecated Or.imp_left]
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_left {a c b : Prop} (h₁ : a ∨ c) (h : a → b) : b ∨ c := Or.imp_left h h₁
#align or_of_or_of_imp_left or_of_or_of_imp_left
@[deprecated Or.imp_right]
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_right {c a b : Prop} (h₁ : c ∨ a) (h : a → b) : c ∨ b := Or.imp_right h h₁
#align or_of_or_of_imp_right or_of_or_of_imp_right
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
#align or.elim3 Or.elim3
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
#align or.imp3 Or.imp3
#align or_imp_distrib or_imp
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
#align or_iff_not_imp_left Classical.or_iff_not_imp_left
#align or_iff_not_imp_right Classical.or_iff_not_imp_right
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := Decidable.not_or_of_imp
#align not_or_of_imp not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
#align decidable.or_not_of_imp Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := Decidable.or_not_of_imp
#align or_not_of_imp or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
#align imp_iff_not_or imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b := Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
#align imp_iff_or_not imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := Decidable.not_imp_not
#align not_imp_not not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
#align function.mtr Function.mtr
#align decidable.or_congr_left Decidable.or_congr_left'
#align decidable.or_congr_right Decidable.or_congr_right'
#align decidable.or_iff_not_imp_right Decidable.or_iff_not_imp_rightₓ -- reorder implicits
#align decidable.imp_iff_or_not Decidable.imp_iff_or_notₓ -- reorder implicits
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
Decidable.or_congr_left' h
#align or_congr_left or_congr_left'
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c := Decidable.or_congr_right' h
#align or_congr_right or_congr_right'ₓ -- reorder implicits
#align or_iff_left or_iff_leftₓ -- reorder implicits
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
#align and_or_distrib_left and_or_left
#align or_and_distrib_right or_and_right
#align or_and_distrib_left or_and_left
#align and_or_distrib_right and_or_right
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
#align iff.iff Iff.iff
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
#align iff_mpr_iff_true_intro iff_mpr_iff_true_intro
#align decidable.imp_or_distrib Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) := Decidable.imp_or
#align imp_or_distrib imp_or
#align decidable.imp_or_distrib' Decidable.imp_or'
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) := Decidable.imp_or'
#align imp_or_distrib' imp_or'ₓ -- universes
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
#align not_imp not_imp
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := Decidable.peirce _ _
#align peirce peirce
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := Decidable.not_iff_not
#align not_iff_not not_iff_not
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := Decidable.not_iff_comm
#align not_iff_comm not_iff_comm
theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := Decidable.not_iff
#align not_iff not_iff
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬a) := Decidable.iff_not_comm
#align iff_not_comm iff_not_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ a ∧ b ∨ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
Decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
#align iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
theorem iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b) :=
Decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
#align iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ a → b := Decidable.not_and_not_right
#align not_and_not_right not_and_not_right
#align decidable_of_iff decidable_of_iff
#align decidable_of_iff' decidable_of_iff'
#align decidable_of_bool decidable_of_bool
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
#align decidable.not_and_distrib Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not_not
#align decidable.not_and_distrib' Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not_not'
/-- One of **de Morgan's laws**: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_or : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not_not
#align not_and_distrib not_and_or
#align not_or_distrib not_or
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∧ ¬b) := Decidable.or_iff_not_and_not
#align or_iff_not_and_not or_iff_not_and_not
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ ¬b) := Decidable.and_iff_not_or_not
#align and_iff_not_or_not and_iff_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor (P Q : Prop) : ¬Xor' P Q ↔ (P ↔ Q) := by
simp only [not_and, Xor', not_or, not_not, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
#align not_xor not_xor
theorem xor_iff_not_iff (P Q : Prop) : Xor' P Q ↔ ¬ (P ↔ Q) := (not_xor P Q).not_right
#align xor_iff_not_iff xor_iff_not_iff
theorem xor_iff_iff_not : Xor' a b ↔ (a ↔ ¬b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_right a, not_not]
#align xor_iff_iff_not xor_iff_iff_not
theorem xor_iff_not_iff' : Xor' a b ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_left _ b, not_not]
#align xor_iff_not_iff' xor_iff_not_iff'
end Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem' := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem'
#align has_mem.mem.ne_of_not_mem Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem
#align has_mem.mem.ne_of_not_mem' Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem'
section Equality
-- todo: change name
theorem forall_cond_comm {α} {s : α → Prop} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a, s a → ∀ b, s b → p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, s a → s b → p a b :=
⟨fun h a b ha hb ↦ h a ha b hb, fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a b ha hb⟩
#align ball_cond_comm forall_cond_comm
theorem forall_mem_comm {α β} [Membership α β] {s : β} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a (_ : a ∈ s) b (_ : b ∈ s), p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → p a b :=
forall_cond_comm
#align ball_mem_comm forall_mem_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_cond_comm := forall_cond_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_mem_comm := forall_mem_comm
#align ne_of_apply_ne ne_of_apply_ne
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c := h₂ ▸ h₁
alias Eq.trans_ne := ne_of_eq_of_ne
alias Ne.trans_eq := ne_of_ne_of_eq
#align eq.trans_ne Eq.trans_ne
#align ne.trans_eq Ne.trans_eq
theorem eq_equivalence {α : Sort*} : Equivalence (@Eq α) :=
⟨Eq.refl, @Eq.symm _, @Eq.trans _⟩
#align eq_equivalence eq_equivalence
-- These were migrated to Batteries but the `@[simp]` attributes were (mysteriously?) removed.
attribute [simp] eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
#align eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mp_eq_cast
#align eq_mpr_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
#align cast_cast cast_cast
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (Eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h := rfl
#align congr_refl_left congr_refl_left
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (Eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a := rfl
#align congr_refl_right congr_refl_right
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (Eq.refl a) = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
#align congr_arg_refl congr_arg_refl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) : congr_fun (Eq.refl f) a = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
#align congr_fun_rfl congr_fun_rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (fun a ↦ f a b) p := rfl
#align congr_fun_congr_arg congr_fun_congr_arg
#align heq_of_cast_eq heq_of_cast_eq
#align cast_eq_iff_heq cast_eq_iff_heq
theorem Eq.rec_eq_cast {α : Sort _} {P : α → Sort _} {x y : α} (h : x = y) (z : P x) :
h ▸ z = cast (congr_arg P h) z := by induction h; rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem. More general version of `eqRec_heq`
theorem eqRec_heq' {α : Sort*} {a' : α} {motive : (a : α) → a' = a → Sort*}
(p : motive a' (rfl : a' = a')) {a : α} (t : a' = a) :
HEq (@Eq.rec α a' motive p a t) p := by
subst t; rfl
set_option autoImplicit true in
theorem rec_heq_of_heq {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} (e : a = b) (h : HEq x y) :
HEq (e ▸ x) y := by subst e; exact h
#align rec_heq_of_heq rec_heq_of_heq
set_option autoImplicit true in
theorem rec_heq_iff_heq {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} {e : a = b} :
HEq (e ▸ x) y ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
#align rec_heq_iff_heq rec_heq_iff_heq
set_option autoImplicit true in
theorem heq_rec_iff_heq {C : α → Sort*} {x : β} {y : C a} {e : a = b} :
HEq x (e ▸ y) ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
#align heq_rec_iff_heq heq_rec_iff_heq
#align eq.congr Eq.congr
#align eq.congr_left Eq.congr_left
#align eq.congr_right Eq.congr_right
#align congr_arg2 congr_arg₂
#align congr_fun₂ congr_fun₂
#align congr_fun₃ congr_fun₃
#align funext₂ funext₂
#align funext₃ funext₃
end Equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section Quantifiers
section Dependent
variable {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*} {δ : ∀ a b, γ a b → Sort*}
{ε : ∀ a b c, δ a b c → Sort*}
theorem pi_congr {β' : α → Sort _} (h : ∀ a, β a = β' a) : (∀ a, β a) = ∀ a, β' a :=
(funext h : β = β') ▸ rfl
#align pi_congr pi_congr
-- Porting note: some higher order lemmas such as `forall₂_congr` and `exists₂_congr`
-- were moved to `Batteries`
theorem forall₂_imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) → ∀ a b, q a b :=
forall_imp fun i ↦ forall_imp <| h i
#align forall₂_imp forall₂_imp
theorem forall₃_imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) → ∀ a b c, q a b c :=
forall_imp fun a ↦ forall₂_imp <| h a
#align forall₃_imp forall₃_imp
theorem Exists₂.imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) → ∃ a b, q a b :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists.imp <| h a
#align Exists₂.imp Exists₂.imp
theorem Exists₃.imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) → ∃ a b c, q a b c :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists₂.imp <| h a
#align Exists₃.imp Exists₃.imp
end Dependent
variable {α β : Sort*} {p q : α → Prop}
#align exists_imp_exists' Exists.imp'
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y := ⟨swap, swap⟩
#align forall_swap forall_swap
theorem forall₂_swap
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∀ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := ⟨swap₂, swap₂⟩
#align forall₂_swap forall₂_swap
/-- We intentionally restrict the type of `α` in this lemma so that this is a safer to use in simp
than `forall_swap`. -/
theorem imp_forall_iff {α : Type*} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} : (p → ∀ x, q x) ↔ ∀ x, p → q x :=
forall_swap
#align imp_forall_iff imp_forall_iff
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨y, x, h⟩, fun ⟨y, x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
#align exists_swap exists_swap
#align forall_exists_index forall_exists_index
#align exists_imp_distrib exists_imp
#align not_exists_of_forall_not not_exists_of_forall_not
#align Exists.some Exists.choose
#align Exists.some_spec Exists.choose_spec
#align decidable.not_forall Decidable.not_forall
export Classical (not_forall)
#align not_forall Classical.not_forall
#align decidable.not_forall_not Decidable.not_forall_not
theorem not_forall_not : (¬∀ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := Decidable.not_forall_not
#align not_forall_not not_forall_not
#align decidable.not_exists_not Decidable.not_exists_not
export Classical (not_exists_not)
#align not_exists_not Classical.not_exists_not
lemma forall_or_exists_not (P : α → Prop) : (∀ a, P a) ∨ ∃ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_forall]; exact em _
lemma exists_or_forall_not (P : α → Prop) : (∃ a, P a) ∨ ∀ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_exists]; exact em _
theorem forall_imp_iff_exists_imp {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} [ha : Nonempty α] :
(∀ x, p x) → b ↔ ∃ x, p x → b := by
let ⟨a⟩ := ha
refine ⟨fun h ↦ not_forall_not.1 fun h' ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ h ↦ hx (h x)⟩
exact if hb : b then h' a fun _ ↦ hb else hb <| h fun x ↦ (_root_.not_imp.1 (h' x)).1
#align forall_imp_iff_exists_imp forall_imp_iff_exists_imp
@[mfld_simps]
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → True) ↔ True := imp_true_iff _
#align forall_true_iff forall_true_iff
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ True) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ ↦ of_iff_true (h _)
#align forall_true_iff' forall_true_iff'
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₂_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → True) ↔ True := by simp
#align forall_2_true_iff forall₂_true_iff
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₃_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ (a) (b : β a), γ a b → True) ↔ True := by simp
#align forall_3_true_iff forall₃_true_iff
@[simp] theorem exists_unique_iff_exists [Subsingleton α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃! x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.exists, Exists.imp fun x hx ↦ ⟨hx, fun y _ ↦ Subsingleton.elim y x⟩⟩
#align exists_unique_iff_exists exists_unique_iff_exists
-- forall_forall_const is no longer needed
#align exists_const exists_const
theorem exists_unique_const {b : Prop} (α : Sort*) [i : Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] :
(∃! _ : α, b) ↔ b := by simp
#align exists_unique_const exists_unique_const
#align forall_and_distrib forall_and
#align exists_or_distrib exists_or
#align exists_and_distrib_left exists_and_left
#align exists_and_distrib_right exists_and_right
theorem Decidable.and_forall_ne [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {p : α → Prop} :
(p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b := by
simp only [← @forall_eq _ p a, ← forall_and, ← or_imp, Decidable.em, forall_const]
#align decidable.and_forall_ne Decidable.and_forall_ne
theorem and_forall_ne (a : α) : (p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b :=
Decidable.and_forall_ne a
#align and_forall_ne and_forall_ne
theorem Ne.ne_or_ne {x y : α} (z : α) (h : x ≠ y) : x ≠ z ∨ y ≠ z :=
not_and_or.1 <| mt (and_imp.2 (· ▸ ·)) h.symm
#align ne.ne_or_ne Ne.ne_or_ne
@[simp] theorem exists_unique_eq {a' : α} : ∃! a, a = a' := by
simp only [eq_comm, ExistsUnique, and_self, forall_eq', exists_eq']
#align exists_unique_eq exists_unique_eq
@[simp] theorem exists_unique_eq' {a' : α} : ∃! a, a' = a := by
simp only [ExistsUnique, and_self, forall_eq', exists_eq']
#align exists_unique_eq' exists_unique_eq'
@[simp]
theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a := ⟨a', rfl⟩
#align exists_apply_eq_apply' exists_apply_eq_apply'
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2 {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f x y = f a b :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2' {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f a b = f x y :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3 {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f x y z = f a b c :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3' {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f a b c = f x y z :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: an alternative workaround theorem:
theorem exists_apply_eq (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ f : α → β, f a = b := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, hp, hq⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
#align exists_exists_and_eq_and exists_exists_and_eq_and
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
#align exists_exists_eq_and exists_exists_eq_and
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_exists_and_eq_and {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ f a b = c) ∧ r c) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ r (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_exists_and_eq {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, ∃ b, f a b = c) ∧ p c) ↔ ∃ a, ∃ b, p (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, b, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_or_eq_left (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ x : α, x = y ∨ p x := ⟨y, .inl rfl⟩
#align exists_or_eq_left exists_or_eq_left
@[simp] theorem exists_or_eq_right (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ x : α, p x ∨ x = y := ⟨y, .inr rfl⟩
#align exists_or_eq_right exists_or_eq_right
@[simp] theorem exists_or_eq_left' (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ x : α, y = x ∨ p x := ⟨y, .inl rfl⟩
#align exists_or_eq_left' exists_or_eq_left'
@[simp] theorem exists_or_eq_right' (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ x : α, p x ∨ y = x := ⟨y, .inr rfl⟩
#align exists_or_eq_right' exists_or_eq_right'
theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, f a = b → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
#align forall_apply_eq_imp_iff forall_apply_eq_imp_iff'
#align forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' forall_apply_eq_imp_iff
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 845 | 846 | theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, b = f a → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
/-!
# Hausdorff distance
The Hausdorff distance on subsets of a metric (or emetric) space.
Given two subsets `s` and `t` of a metric space, their Hausdorff distance is the smallest `d`
such that any point `s` is within `d` of a point in `t`, and conversely. This quantity
is often infinite (think of `s` bounded and `t` unbounded), and therefore better
expressed in the setting of emetric spaces.
## Main definitions
This files introduces:
* `EMetric.infEdist x s`, the infimum edistance of a point `x` to a set `s` in an emetric space
* `EMetric.hausdorffEdist s t`, the Hausdorff edistance of two sets in an emetric space
* Versions of these notions on metric spaces, called respectively `Metric.infDist`
and `Metric.hausdorffDist`
## Main results
* `infEdist_closure`: the edistance to a set and its closure coincide
* `EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero`: a point `x` belongs to the closure of `s` iff
`infEdist x s = 0`
* `IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist`: if `s` is compact and non-empty, there exists a point `y`
which attains this edistance
* `IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed`: every open set `U` can be written as the increasing union
of countably many closed subsets of `U`
* `hausdorffEdist_closure`: replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance
* `hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure`: two sets have Hausdorff edistance zero
iff their closures coincide
* the Hausdorff edistance is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality
* in particular, closed sets in an emetric space are an emetric space
(this is shown in `EMetricSpace.closeds.emetricspace`)
* versions of these notions on metric spaces
* `hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded`: if two sets in a metric space
are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff edistance.
## Tags
metric space, Hausdorff distance
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Pointwise Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace EMetric
section InfEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The minimal edistance of a point to a set -/
def infEdist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ y ∈ s, edist x y
#align emetric.inf_edist EMetric.infEdist
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_empty : infEdist x ∅ = ∞ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align emetric.inf_edist_empty EMetric.infEdist_empty
theorem le_infEdist {d} : d ≤ infEdist x s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, d ≤ edist x y := by
simp only [infEdist, le_iInf_iff]
#align emetric.le_inf_edist EMetric.le_infEdist
/-- The edist to a union is the minimum of the edists -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_union : infEdist x (s ∪ t) = infEdist x s ⊓ infEdist x t :=
iInf_union
#align emetric.inf_edist_union EMetric.infEdist_union
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) (x : α) : infEdist x (⋃ i, f i) = ⨅ i, infEdist x (f i) :=
iInf_iUnion f _
#align emetric.inf_edist_Union EMetric.infEdist_iUnion
lemma infEdist_biUnion {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) (x : α) :
infEdist x (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, infEdist x (f i) := by simp only [infEdist_iUnion]
/-- The edist to a singleton is the edistance to the single point of this singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_singleton : infEdist x {y} = edist x y :=
iInf_singleton
#align emetric.inf_edist_singleton EMetric.infEdist_singleton
/-- The edist to a set is bounded above by the edist to any of its points -/
theorem infEdist_le_edist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y :=
iInf₂_le y h
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem
/-- If a point `x` belongs to `s`, then its edist to `s` vanishes -/
theorem infEdist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| @edist_self _ _ x ▸ infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h
#align emetric.inf_edist_zero_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_zero_of_mem
/-- The edist is antitone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infEdist_anti (h : s ⊆ t) : infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s :=
iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h
#align emetric.inf_edist_anti EMetric.infEdist_anti
/-- The edist to a set is `< r` iff there exists a point in the set at edistance `< r` -/
theorem infEdist_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : infEdist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infEdist, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align emetric.inf_edist_lt_iff EMetric.infEdist_lt_iff
/-- The edist of `x` to `s` is bounded by the sum of the edist of `y` to `s` and
the edist from `x` to `y` -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist : infEdist x s ≤ infEdist y s + edist x y :=
calc
⨅ z ∈ s, edist x z ≤ ⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z + edist x y :=
iInf₂_mono fun z _ => (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
_ = (⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z) + edist x y := by simp only [ENNReal.iInf_add]
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
theorem infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y + infEdist y s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_add_inf_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist
theorem edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam (hy : y ∈ s) : edist x y ≤ infEdist x s + diam s := by
simp_rw [infEdist, ENNReal.iInf_add]
refine le_iInf₂ fun i hi => ?_
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x i + edist i y := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ edist x i + diam s := add_le_add le_rfl (edist_le_diam_of_mem hi hy)
#align emetric.edist_le_inf_edist_add_ediam EMetric.edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam
/-- The edist to a set depends continuously on the point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infEdist : Continuous fun x => infEdist x s :=
continuous_of_le_add_edist 1 (by simp) <| by
simp only [one_mul, infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist, forall₂_true_iff]
#align emetric.continuous_inf_edist EMetric.continuous_infEdist
/-- The edist to a set and to its closure coincide -/
theorem infEdist_closure : infEdist x (closure s) = infEdist x s := by
refine le_antisymm (infEdist_anti subset_closure) ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_
have ε0 : 0 < (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x (closure s) < infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right h.ne ε0.ne'
obtain ⟨y : α, ycs : y ∈ closure s, hy : edist x y < infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
obtain ⟨z : α, zs : z ∈ s, dyz : edist y z < ↑ε / 2⟩ := EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 ycs (ε / 2) ε0
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zs
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_le_add (le_of_lt hy) (le_of_lt dyz)
_ = infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
#align emetric.inf_edist_closure EMetric.infEdist_closure
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero : x ∈ closure s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← infEdist_closure]
exact infEdist_zero_of_mem h,
fun h =>
EMetric.mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε εpos => infEdist_lt_iff.mp <| by rwa [h]⟩
#align emetric.mem_closure_iff_inf_edist_zero EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed (h : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 := by
rw [← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, h.closure_eq]
#align emetric.mem_iff_inf_edist_zero_of_closed EMetric.mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed
/-- The infimum edistance of a point to a set is positive if and only if the point is not in the
closure of the set. -/
theorem infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x E ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align emetric.inf_edist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure EMetric.infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure
theorem infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x (closure E) ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [infEdist_closure, infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure]
#align emetric.inf_edist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure EMetric.infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure
theorem exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ ENNReal.ofReal ε < infEdist x E := by
rw [← infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure, ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn] at h
rcases h with ⟨ε, ⟨_, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩⟩
exact ⟨ε, ⟨ENNReal.ofReal_pos.mp ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩
#align emetric.exists_real_pos_lt_inf_edist_of_not_mem_closure EMetric.exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r < infEdist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s := by
rw [disjoint_left]
intro y hy h'y
apply lt_irrefl (infEdist x s)
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x y := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h'y
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall, edist_comm] at hy
_ < infEdist x s := h
#align emetric.disjoint_closed_ball_of_lt_inf_edist EMetric.disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist
/-- The infimum edistance is invariant under isometries -/
theorem infEdist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infEdist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infEdist x t := by
simp only [infEdist, iInf_image, hΦ.edist_eq]
#align emetric.inf_edist_image EMetric.infEdist_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_smul {M} [SMul M α] [IsometricSMul M α] (c : M) (x : α) (s : Set α) :
infEdist (c • x) (c • s) = infEdist x s :=
infEdist_image (isometry_smul _ _)
#align emetric.inf_edist_smul EMetric.infEdist_smul
#align emetric.inf_edist_vadd EMetric.infEdist_vadd
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed {U : Set α} (hU : IsOpen U) :
∃ F : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, IsClosed (F n)) ∧ (∀ n, F n ⊆ U) ∧ ⋃ n, F n = U ∧ Monotone F := by
obtain ⟨a, a_pos, a_lt_one⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ≥0∞, 0 < a ∧ a < 1 := exists_between zero_lt_one
let F := fun n : ℕ => (fun x => infEdist x Uᶜ) ⁻¹' Ici (a ^ n)
have F_subset : ∀ n, F n ⊆ U := fun n x hx ↦ by
by_contra h
have : infEdist x Uᶜ ≠ 0 := ((ENNReal.pow_pos a_pos _).trans_le hx).ne'
exact this (infEdist_zero_of_mem h)
refine ⟨F, fun n => IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Ici, F_subset, ?_, ?_⟩
· show ⋃ n, F n = U
refine Subset.antisymm (by simp only [iUnion_subset_iff, F_subset, forall_const]) fun x hx => ?_
have : ¬x ∈ Uᶜ := by simpa using hx
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed hU.isClosed_compl] at this
have B : 0 < infEdist x Uᶜ := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using this
have : Filter.Tendsto (fun n => a ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one a_lt_one
rcases ((tendsto_order.1 this).2 _ B).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Ici, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨n, hn.le⟩
show Monotone F
intro m n hmn x hx
simp only [F, mem_Ici, mem_preimage] at hx ⊢
apply le_trans (pow_le_pow_right_of_le_one' a_lt_one.le hmn) hx
#align is_open.exists_Union_is_closed IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infEdist x s = edist x y := by
have A : Continuous fun y => edist x y := continuous_const.edist continuous_id
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne A.continuousOn
exact ⟨y, ys, le_antisymm (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) (by rwa [le_infEdist])⟩
#align is_compact.exists_inf_edist_eq_edist IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist
theorem exists_pos_forall_lt_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hst : Disjoint s t) :
∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (r : ℝ≥0∞) < edist x y := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· use 1
simp
obtain ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne continuous_infEdist.continuousOn
have : 0 < infEdist x t :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun H => hst.le_bot ⟨hx, (mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht).mpr H⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 this with ⟨r, h₀, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, ENNReal.coe_pos.mp h₀, fun y hy z hz => hr.trans_le <| le_infEdist.1 (h hy) z hz⟩
#align emetric.exists_pos_forall_lt_edist EMetric.exists_pos_forall_lt_edist
end InfEdist
/-! ### The Hausdorff distance as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between two sets is the smallest `r` such that each set
is contained in the `r`-neighborhood of the other one -/
irreducible_def hausdorffEdist {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (s t : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(⨆ x ∈ s, infEdist x t) ⊔ ⨆ y ∈ t, infEdist y s
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_def EMetric.hausdorffEdist_def
section HausdorffEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t u : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-- The Hausdorff edistance of a set to itself vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self : hausdorffEdist s s = 0 := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_idem, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
exact fun x hx => infEdist_zero_of_mem hx
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_self EMetric.hausdorffEdist_self
/-- The Haudorff edistances of `s` to `t` and of `t` to `s` coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_comm : hausdorffEdist s t = hausdorffEdist t s := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def]; apply sup_comm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_comm EMetric.hausdorffEdist_comm
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by bounding the edistance of any point
in each set to the other set -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x t ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, infEdist x s ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
exact ⟨H1, H2⟩
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_of_inf_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by exhibiting, for any point in each set,
another point in the other set at controlled distance -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, edist x y ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist (fun x xs ↦ ?_) (fun x xt ↦ ?_)
· rcases H1 x xs with ⟨y, yt, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem yt) hy
· rcases H2 x xt with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) hy
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_of_mem_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist
/-- The distance to a set is controlled by the Hausdorff distance. -/
theorem infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
refine le_trans ?_ le_sup_left
exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) x h
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_Hausdorff_edist_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, then any point in one of the sets has
a corresponding point at distance `< r` in the other set. -/
theorem exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ∈ s) (H : hausdorffEdist s t < r) :
∃ y ∈ t, edist x y < r :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp <|
calc
infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem h
_ < r := H
#align emetric.exists_edist_lt_of_Hausdorff_edist_lt EMetric.exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt
/-- The distance from `x` to `s` or `t` is controlled in terms of the Hausdorff distance
between `s` and `t`. -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist :
infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t :=
ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => by
have ε0 : (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x s < infEdist x s + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).1.ne ε0
obtain ⟨y : α, ys : y ∈ s, dxy : edist x y < infEdist x s + ↑ε / 2⟩ := infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
have : hausdorffEdist s t < hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).2.ne ε0
obtain ⟨z : α, zt : z ∈ t, dyz : edist y z < hausdorffEdist s t + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt ys this
calc
infEdist x t ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zt
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x s + ε / 2 + (hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2) := add_le_add dxy.le dyz.le
_ = infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t + ε := by
simp [ENNReal.add_halves, add_comm, add_left_comm]
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_Hausdorff_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
/-- The Hausdorff edistance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_image (h : Isometry Φ) :
hausdorffEdist (Φ '' s) (Φ '' t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, iSup_image, infEdist_image h]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_image EMetric.hausdorffEdist_image
/-- The Hausdorff distance is controlled by the diameter of the union. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_ediam (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
hausdorffEdist s t ≤ diam (s ∪ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨y, yt⟩
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist ?_ ?_
· intro z hz
exact ⟨y, yt, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_left hz) (subset_union_right yt)⟩
· intro z hz
exact ⟨x, xs, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_right hz) (subset_union_left xs)⟩
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_ediam EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_ediam
/-- The Hausdorff distance satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_triangle : hausdorffEdist s u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
simp only [sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
constructor
· show ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xs =>
calc
infEdist x u ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs) _
· show ∀ x ∈ u, infEdist x s ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xu =>
calc
infEdist x s ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist u t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xu) _
_ = hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm, add_comm]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_triangle EMetric.hausdorffEdist_triangle
/-- Two sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they have the same closure. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ closure s = closure t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, ENNReal.sup_eq_zero, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero, ← subset_def,
← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, subset_antisymm_iff, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between a set and its closure vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self_closure : hausdorffEdist s (closure s) = 0 := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, closure_closure]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_self_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_self_closure
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₁ : hausdorffEdist (closure s) t = hausdorffEdist s t := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist (closure s) s + hausdorffEdist s t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist s t := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm]
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s (closure s) + hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := by simp
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure₁ EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure₁
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₂ : hausdorffEdist s (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp [@hausdorffEdist_comm _ _ s _]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure₂ EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure₂
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between sets or their closures is the same. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure : hausdorffEdist (closure s) (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure
/-- Two closed sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ s = t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, hs.closure_eq, ht.closure_eq]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed EMetric.hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed
/-- The Haudorff edistance to the empty set is infinite. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_empty (ne : s.Nonempty) : hausdorffEdist s ∅ = ∞ := by
rcases ne with ⟨x, xs⟩
have : infEdist x ∅ ≤ hausdorffEdist s ∅ := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs
simpa using this
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_empty EMetric.hausdorffEdist_empty
/-- If a set is at finite Hausdorff edistance of a nonempty set, it is nonempty. -/
theorem nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (hs : s.Nonempty) (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
t.Nonempty :=
t.eq_empty_or_nonempty.resolve_left fun ht ↦ fin (ht.symm ▸ hausdorffEdist_empty hs)
#align emetric.nonempty_of_Hausdorff_edist_ne_top EMetric.nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top
theorem empty_or_nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
(s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅) ∨ (s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ht | ht
· exact Or.inl ⟨hs, ht⟩
· rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
exact Or.inr ⟨nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top ht fin, ht⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hs, nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top hs fin⟩
#align emetric.empty_or_nonempty_of_Hausdorff_edist_ne_top EMetric.empty_or_nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top
end HausdorffEdist
-- section
end EMetric
/-! Now, we turn to the same notions in metric spaces. To avoid the difficulties related to
`sInf` and `sSup` on `ℝ` (which is only conditionally complete), we use the notions in `ℝ≥0∞`
formulated in terms of the edistance, and coerce them to `ℝ`.
Then their properties follow readily from the corresponding properties in `ℝ≥0∞`,
modulo some tedious rewriting of inequalities from one to the other. -/
--namespace
namespace Metric
section
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {s t u : Set α} {x y : α} {Φ : α → β}
open EMetric
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ`. -/
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set -/
def infDist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (infEdist x s)
#align metric.inf_dist Metric.infDist
theorem infDist_eq_iInf : infDist x s = ⨅ y : s, dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infEdist, iInf_subtype', ENNReal.toReal_iInf]
· simp only [dist_edist]
· exact fun _ ↦ edist_ne_top _ _
#align metric.inf_dist_eq_infi Metric.infDist_eq_iInf
/-- The minimal distance is always nonnegative -/
theorem infDist_nonneg : 0 ≤ infDist x s := toReal_nonneg
#align metric.inf_dist_nonneg Metric.infDist_nonneg
/-- The minimal distance to the empty set is 0 (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.infEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`) -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_empty : infDist x ∅ = 0 := by simp [infDist]
#align metric.inf_dist_empty Metric.infDist_empty
/-- In a metric space, the minimal edistance to a nonempty set is finite. -/
theorem infEdist_ne_top (h : s.Nonempty) : infEdist x s ≠ ⊤ := by
rcases h with ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hy)
#align metric.inf_edist_ne_top Metric.infEdist_ne_top
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: make it a `simp` lemma
theorem infEdist_eq_top_iff : infEdist x s = ∞ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs <;> simp [*, Nonempty.ne_empty, infEdist_ne_top]
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set containing it vanishes. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [infEdist_zero_of_mem h, infDist]
#align metric.inf_dist_zero_of_mem Metric.infDist_zero_of_mem
/-- The minimal distance to a singleton is the distance to the unique point in this singleton. -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_singleton : infDist x {y} = dist x y := by simp [infDist, dist_edist]
#align metric.inf_dist_singleton Metric.infDist_singleton
/-- The minimal distance to a set is bounded by the distance to any point in this set. -/
theorem infDist_le_dist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infDist x s ≤ dist x y := by
rw [dist_edist, infDist]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h)
#align metric.inf_dist_le_dist_of_mem Metric.infDist_le_dist_of_mem
/-- The minimal distance is monotone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x t ≤ infDist x s :=
ENNReal.toReal_mono (infEdist_ne_top hs) (infEdist_anti h)
#align metric.inf_dist_le_inf_dist_of_subset Metric.infDist_le_infDist_of_subset
/-- The minimal distance to a set `s` is `< r` iff there exists a point in `s` at distance `< r`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDistance.lean | 537 | 539 | theorem infDist_lt_iff {r : ℝ} (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < r := by |
simp_rw [infDist, ← ENNReal.lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (infEdist_ne_top hs), infEdist_lt_iff,
ENNReal.lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (edist_ne_top _ _), ← dist_edist]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import order.symm_diff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6eb334bd8f3433d5b08ba156b8ec3e6af47e1904"
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
#align symm_diff symmDiff
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
#align bihimp bihimp
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_def symmDiff_def
theorem bihimp_def [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
#align bihimp_def bihimp_def
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_eq_xor symmDiff_eq_Xor'
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _).symm.trans Iff.comm
#align bihimp_iff_iff bihimp_iff_iff
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
#align bool.symm_diff_eq_bxor Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_symm_diff toDual_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_bihimp ofDual_bihimp
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
#align symm_diff_comm symmDiff_comm
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
#align symm_diff_is_comm symmDiff_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
#align symm_diff_self symmDiff_self
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_bot symmDiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
#align bot_symm_diff bot_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
#align symm_diff_eq_bot symmDiff_eq_bot
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_le symmDiff_of_le
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_ge symmDiff_of_ge
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
#align symm_diff_le symmDiff_le
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align symm_diff_le_iff symmDiff_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
#align symm_diff_le_sup symmDiff_le_sup
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.symm_diff_eq_sup Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
#align symm_diff_sdiff symmDiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_sdiff_inf symmDiff_sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
#align symm_diff_sdiff_eq_sup symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_symm_diff_eq_sup sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
#align symm_diff_sup_inf symmDiff_sup_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align inf_sup_symm_diff inf_sup_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align symm_diff_symm_diff_inf symmDiff_symmDiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
#align inf_symm_diff_symm_diff inf_symmDiff_symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_triangle symmDiff_triangle
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_bihimp toDual_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_symm_diff ofDual_symmDiff
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
#align bihimp_comm bihimp_comm
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
#align bihimp_is_comm bihimp_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
#align bihimp_self bihimp_self
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
#align bihimp_top bihimp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
#align top_bihimp top_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_eq_top bihimp_eq_top
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
#align bihimp_of_le bihimp_of_le
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
#align bihimp_of_ge bihimp_of_ge
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
#align le_bihimp le_bihimp
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
#align le_bihimp_iff le_bihimp_iff
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
#align inf_le_bihimp inf_le_bihimp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
#align bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
#align codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
#align himp_bihimp himp_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
#align sup_himp_bihimp sup_himp_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_himp_eq_inf bihimp_himp_eq_inf
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align himp_bihimp_eq_inf himp_bihimp_eq_inf
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_inf_sup bihimp_inf_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align sup_inf_bihimp sup_inf_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_bihimp_sup bihimp_bihimp_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align sup_bihimp_bihimp sup_bihimp_bihimp
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align bihimp_triangle bihimp_triangle
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 343 | 343 | theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by | simp [symmDiff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.NNReal
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.asymptotics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b9eaaa7686280fad8cce467f5c3c57ee6ce77f8"
/-!
# Limits and asymptotics of power functions at `+∞`
This file contains results about the limiting behaviour of power functions at `+∞`. For convenience
some results on asymptotics as `x → 0` (those which are not just continuity statements) are also
located here.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real Topology NNReal ENNReal Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
/-!
## Limits at `+∞`
-/
section Limits
open Real Filter
/-- The function `x ^ y` tends to `+∞` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ y) atTop atTop := by
rw [tendsto_atTop_atTop]
intro b
use max b 0 ^ (1 / y)
intro x hx
exact
le_of_max_le_left
(by
convert rpow_le_rpow (rpow_nonneg (le_max_right b 0) (1 / y)) hx (le_of_lt hy)
using 1
rw [← rpow_mul (le_max_right b 0), (eq_div_iff (ne_of_gt hy)).mp rfl, Real.rpow_one])
#align tendsto_rpow_at_top tendsto_rpow_atTop
/-- The function `x ^ (-y)` tends to `0` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_neg_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ (-y)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
Tendsto.congr' (eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) fun _ hx => (rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) y).symm)
(tendsto_rpow_atTop hy).inv_tendsto_atTop
#align tendsto_rpow_neg_at_top tendsto_rpow_neg_atTop
open Asymptotics in
lemma tendsto_rpow_atTop_of_base_lt_one (b : ℝ) (hb₀ : -1 < b) (hb₁ : b < 1) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 (0:ℝ)) := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with hb|rfl|hb
case inl => -- b < 0
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos hb.le, hb.ne, ite_false]
rw [← isLittleO_const_iff (c := (1:ℝ)) one_ne_zero, (one_mul (1 : ℝ)).symm]
refine IsLittleO.mul_isBigO ?exp ?cos
case exp =>
rw [isLittleO_const_iff one_ne_zero]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg ?_).mpr tendsto_id
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, log_neg_iff (by linarith)]
linarith
case cos =>
rw [isBigO_iff]
exact ⟨1, eventually_of_forall fun x => by simp [Real.abs_cos_le_one]⟩
case inr.inl => -- b = 0
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (Iff.mpr pure_le_nhds_iff rfl)
rw [tendsto_pure]
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with _ hx
simp [hx]
case inr.inr => -- b > 0
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos hb]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg ?_).mpr tendsto_id
exact (log_neg_iff hb).mpr hb₁
lemma tendsto_rpow_atTop_of_base_gt_one (b : ℝ) (hb : 1 < b) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot (𝓝 (0:ℝ)) := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_pos ?_).mpr tendsto_id
exact (log_pos_iff (by positivity)).mpr <| by aesop
lemma tendsto_rpow_atBot_of_base_lt_one (b : ℝ) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b < 1) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot atTop := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atTop.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_neg <| tendsto_id (α := ℝ)).mpr ?_
exact (log_neg_iff hb₀).mpr hb₁
lemma tendsto_rpow_atBot_of_base_gt_one (b : ℝ) (hb : 1 < b) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot (𝓝 0) := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_pos <| tendsto_id (α := ℝ)).mpr ?_
exact (log_pos_iff (by positivity)).mpr <| by aesop
/-- The function `x ^ (a / (b * x + c))` tends to `1` at `+∞`, for any real numbers `a`, `b`, and
`c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (a b c : ℝ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ (a / (b * x + c))) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
refine
Tendsto.congr' ?_
((tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one.comp
(by
simpa only [mul_zero, pow_one] using
(tendsto_const_nhds (x := a)).mul
(tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop b c 1 hb))).comp
tendsto_log_atTop)
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro x hx
simp only [Set.mem_Ioi, Function.comp_apply] at hx ⊢
rw [exp_log hx, ← exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx (a / (b * x + c))), log_rpow hx (a / (b * x + c))]
field_simp
#align tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add
/-- The function `x ^ (1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_div : Tendsto (fun x => x ^ ((1 : ℝ) / x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (1 : ℝ) _ (0 : ℝ) zero_ne_one
ring
#align tendsto_rpow_div tendsto_rpow_div
/-- The function `x ^ (-1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_neg_div : Tendsto (fun x => x ^ (-(1 : ℝ) / x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (-(1 : ℝ)) _ (0 : ℝ) zero_ne_one
ring
#align tendsto_rpow_neg_div tendsto_rpow_neg_div
/-- The function `exp(x) / x ^ s` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any real number `s`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_div_rpow_atTop (s : ℝ) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => exp x / x ^ s) atTop atTop := by
cases' archimedean_iff_nat_lt.1 Real.instArchimedean s with n hn
refine tendsto_atTop_mono' _ ?_ (tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n)
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop (0 : ℝ), eventually_ge_atTop (1 : ℝ)] with x hx₀ hx₁
rw [div_le_div_left (exp_pos _) (pow_pos hx₀ _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx₀ _), ← Real.rpow_natCast]
exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx₁ hn.le
#align tendsto_exp_div_rpow_at_top tendsto_exp_div_rpow_atTop
/-- The function `exp (b * x) / x ^ s` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any real `s` and `b > 0`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop (s : ℝ) (b : ℝ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => exp (b * x) / x ^ s) atTop atTop := by
refine ((tendsto_rpow_atTop hb).comp (tendsto_exp_div_rpow_atTop (s / b))).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop (0 : ℝ)] with x hx₀
simp [Real.div_rpow, (exp_pos x).le, rpow_nonneg, ← Real.rpow_mul, ← exp_mul,
mul_comm x, hb.ne', *]
#align tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_at_top tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop
/-- The function `x ^ s * exp (-b * x)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any real `s` and `b > 0`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero (s : ℝ) (b : ℝ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s b hb).inv_tendsto_atTop.congr' ?_
filter_upwards with x using by simp [exp_neg, inv_div, div_eq_mul_inv _ (exp _)]
#align tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_at_top_nhds_0 tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_0 := tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero
nonrec theorem NNReal.tendsto_rpow_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y) atTop atTop := by
rw [Filter.tendsto_atTop_atTop]
intro b
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := tendsto_atTop_atTop.mp (tendsto_rpow_atTop hy) b
use c.toNNReal
intro a ha
exact mod_cast hc a (Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe.mp ha)
#align nnreal.tendsto_rpow_at_top NNReal.tendsto_rpow_atTop
theorem ENNReal.tendsto_rpow_at_top {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ y) (𝓝 ⊤) (𝓝 ⊤) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
intro x
obtain ⟨c, _, hc⟩ :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff atTop_basis_Ioi).mp (NNReal.tendsto_rpow_atTop hy) x trivial
have hc' : Set.Ioi ↑c ∈ 𝓝 (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) := Ioi_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_lt_top
filter_upwards [hc'] with a ha
by_cases ha' : a = ⊤
· simp [ha', hy]
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha'
-- Porting note: reduced defeq abuse
simp only [Set.mem_Ioi, coe_lt_coe] at ha hc
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hy.le]
exact mod_cast hc a ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_rpow_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_rpow_at_top
end Limits
/-!
## Asymptotic results: `IsBigO`, `IsLittleO` and `IsTheta`
-/
namespace Complex
section
variable {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℂ}
open Asymptotics
theorem isTheta_exp_arg_mul_im (hl : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => |(g x).im|) :
(fun x => Real.exp (arg (f x) * im (g x))) =Θ[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) := by
rcases hl with ⟨b, hb⟩
refine Real.isTheta_exp_comp_one.2 ⟨π * b, ?_⟩
rw [eventually_map] at hb ⊢
refine hb.mono fun x hx => ?_
erw [abs_mul]
exact mul_le_mul (abs_arg_le_pi _) hx (abs_nonneg _) Real.pi_pos.le
#align complex.is_Theta_exp_arg_mul_im Complex.isTheta_exp_arg_mul_im
theorem isBigO_cpow_rpow (hl : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => |(g x).im|) :
(fun x => f x ^ g x) =O[l] fun x => abs (f x) ^ (g x).re :=
calc
(fun x => f x ^ g x) =O[l]
(show α → ℝ from fun x => abs (f x) ^ (g x).re / Real.exp (arg (f x) * im (g x))) :=
isBigO_of_le _ fun x => (abs_cpow_le _ _).trans (le_abs_self _)
_ =Θ[l] (show α → ℝ from fun x => abs (f x) ^ (g x).re / (1 : ℝ)) :=
((isTheta_refl _ _).div (isTheta_exp_arg_mul_im hl))
_ =ᶠ[l] (show α → ℝ from fun x => abs (f x) ^ (g x).re) := by
simp only [ofReal_one, div_one]
rfl
#align complex.is_O_cpow_rpow Complex.isBigO_cpow_rpow
theorem isTheta_cpow_rpow (hl_im : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => |(g x).im|)
(hl : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = 0 → re (g x) = 0 → g x = 0) :
(fun x => f x ^ g x) =Θ[l] fun x => abs (f x) ^ (g x).re :=
calc
(fun x => f x ^ g x) =Θ[l]
(show α → ℝ from fun x => abs (f x) ^ (g x).re / Real.exp (arg (f x) * im (g x))) :=
isTheta_of_norm_eventuallyEq' <| hl.mono fun x => abs_cpow_of_imp
_ =Θ[l] (show α → ℝ from fun x => abs (f x) ^ (g x).re / (1 : ℝ)) :=
((isTheta_refl _ _).div (isTheta_exp_arg_mul_im hl_im))
_ =ᶠ[l] (show α → ℝ from fun x => abs (f x) ^ (g x).re) := by
simp only [ofReal_one, div_one]
rfl
#align complex.is_Theta_cpow_rpow Complex.isTheta_cpow_rpow
theorem isTheta_cpow_const_rpow {b : ℂ} (hl : b.re = 0 → b ≠ 0 → ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ 0) :
(fun x => f x ^ b) =Θ[l] fun x => abs (f x) ^ b.re :=
isTheta_cpow_rpow isBoundedUnder_const <| by
-- Porting note: was
-- simpa only [eventually_imp_distrib_right, Ne.def, ← not_frequently, not_imp_not, Imp.swap]
-- using hl
-- but including `Imp.swap` caused an infinite loop
convert hl
rw [eventually_imp_distrib_right]
tauto
#align complex.is_Theta_cpow_const_rpow Complex.isTheta_cpow_const_rpow
end
end Complex
open Real
namespace Asymptotics
variable {α : Type*} {r c : ℝ} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ}
theorem IsBigOWith.rpow (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hg : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
IsBigOWith (c ^ r) l (fun x => f x ^ r) fun x => g x ^ r := by
apply IsBigOWith.of_bound
filter_upwards [hg, h.bound] with x hgx hx
calc
|f x ^ r| ≤ |f x| ^ r := abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow _ _
_ ≤ (c * |g x|) ^ r := rpow_le_rpow (abs_nonneg _) hx hr
_ = c ^ r * |g x ^ r| := by rw [mul_rpow hc (abs_nonneg _), abs_rpow_of_nonneg hgx]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.rpow Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.rpow
theorem IsBigO.rpow (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hg : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g) (h : f =O[l] g) :
(fun x => f x ^ r) =O[l] fun x => g x ^ r :=
let ⟨_, hc, h'⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(h'.rpow hc hr hg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.rpow Asymptotics.IsBigO.rpow
theorem IsTheta.rpow (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f) (hg : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g) (h : f =Θ[l] g) :
(fun x => f x ^ r) =Θ[l] fun x => g x ^ r :=
⟨h.1.rpow hr hg, h.2.rpow hr hf⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Asymptotics.lean | 279 | 283 | theorem IsLittleO.rpow (hr : 0 < r) (hg : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g) (h : f =o[l] g) :
(fun x => f x ^ r) =o[l] fun x => g x ^ r := by |
refine .of_isBigOWith fun c hc ↦ ?_
rw [← rpow_inv_rpow hc.le hr.ne']
refine (h.forall_isBigOWith ?_).rpow ?_ ?_ hg <;> positivity
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DirectSum.Finsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FinsuppVectorSpace
#align_import linear_algebra.tensor_product_basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f784cc6142443d9ee623a20788c282112c322081"
/-!
# Bases and dimensionality of tensor products of modules
These can not go into `LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct` since they depend on
`LinearAlgebra.FinsuppVectorSpace` which in turn imports `LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set LinearMap Submodule
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {ι : Type*} {κ : Type*}
[CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
/-- If `b : ι → M` and `c : κ → N` are bases then so is `fun i ↦ b i.1 ⊗ₜ c i.2 : ι × κ → M ⊗ N`. -/
def Basis.tensorProduct (b : Basis ι S M) (c : Basis κ R N) :
Basis (ι × κ) S (TensorProduct R M N) :=
Finsupp.basisSingleOne.map
((TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.congr b.repr c.repr).trans <|
(finsuppTensorFinsupp R S _ _ _ _).trans <|
Finsupp.lcongr (Equiv.refl _) (TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.rid R S S)).symm
#align basis.tensor_product Basis.tensorProduct
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Basis.lean | 39 | 41 | theorem Basis.tensorProduct_apply (b : Basis ι R M) (c : Basis κ R N) (i : ι) (j : κ) :
Basis.tensorProduct b c (i, j) = b i ⊗ₜ c j := by |
simp [Basis.tensorProduct]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
/-!
# Angles between vectors
This file defines unoriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `InnerProductGeometry.angle` is the undirected angle between two vectors.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
assert_not_exists HasFDerivAt
assert_not_exists ConformalAt
noncomputable section
open Real Set
open Real
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] {x y : V}
/-- The undirected angle between two vectors. If either vector is 0,
this is π/2. See `Orientation.oangle` for the corresponding oriented angle
definition. -/
def angle (x y : V) : ℝ :=
Real.arccos (⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖))
#align inner_product_geometry.angle InnerProductGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => angle y.1 y.2) x :=
Real.continuous_arccos.continuousAt.comp <|
continuous_inner.continuousAt.div
((continuous_norm.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_norm.comp continuous_snd)).continuousAt
(by simp [hx1, hx2])
#align inner_product_geometry.continuous_at_angle InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle
theorem angle_smul_smul {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x y : V) : angle (c • x) (c • y) = angle x y := by
have : c * c ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hc hc
rw [angle, angle, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, norm_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
mul_mul_mul_comm _ ‖x‖, abs_mul_abs_self, ← mul_assoc c c, mul_div_mul_left _ _ this]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_smul InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_smul
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.angle_map {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] (f : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (u v : E) :
angle (f u) (f v) = angle u v := by
rw [angle, angle, f.inner_map_map, f.norm_map, f.norm_map]
#align linear_isometry.angle_map LinearIsometry.angle_map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Submodule.angle_coe {s : Submodule ℝ V} (x y : s) :
angle (x : V) (y : V) = angle x y :=
s.subtypeₗᵢ.angle_map x y
#align submodule.angle_coe Submodule.angle_coe
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors. -/
theorem cos_angle (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :=
Real.cos_arccos (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_angle InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle
/-- The angle between two vectors does not depend on their order. -/
theorem angle_comm (x y : V) : angle x y = angle y x := by
unfold angle
rw [real_inner_comm, mul_comm]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_comm InnerProductGeometry.angle_comm
/-- The angle between the negation of two vectors. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Basic.lean | 90 | 92 | theorem angle_neg_neg (x y : V) : angle (-x) (-y) = angle x y := by |
unfold angle
rw [inner_neg_neg, norm_neg, norm_neg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monomial
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.WithBot
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.definitions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"808ea4ebfabeb599f21ec4ae87d6dc969597887f"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The definitions include
`degree`, `Monic`, `leadingCoeff`
Results include
- `degree_mul` : The degree of the product is the sum of degrees
- `leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq` and `leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt` :
The leading_coefficient of a sum is determined by the leading coefficients and degrees
-/
-- Porting note: `Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop` should be imported for `Nat.cast_withBot`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
#align polynomial.degree Polynomial.degree
theorem supDegree_eq_degree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree WithBot.some = p.degree :=
max_eq_sup_coe
theorem degree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => degree p < degree q :=
InvImage.wf degree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.degree_lt_wf Polynomial.degree_lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation R[X] :=
⟨_, degree_lt_wf⟩
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbot' 0
#align polynomial.nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`-/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
#align polynomial.leading_coeff Polynomial.leadingCoeff
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.monic Polynomial.Monic
@[nontriviality]
theorem monic_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : R[X]) : Monic p :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton Polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.monic.def Polynomial.Monic.def
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
#align polynomial.monic.decidable Polynomial.Monic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.leading_coeff Polynomial.Monic.leadingCoeff
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.Monic.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_zero Polynomial.degree_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_degree_zero Polynomial.natDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align polynomial.degree_eq_bot Polynomial.degree_eq_bot
@[nontriviality]
theorem degree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, degree_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem natDegree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : natDegree p = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, natDegree_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.natDegree_of_subsingleton
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
#align polynomial.degree_eq_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree
theorem supDegree_eq_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree id = p.natDegree := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp
apply WithBot.coe_injective
rw [← AddMonoidAlgebra.supDegree_withBot_some_comp, Function.comp_id, supDegree_eq_degree,
degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_withBot]
rwa [support_toFinsupp, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, support_eq_empty]
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_withBot` is required.
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbot'_coe]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
#align polynomial.degree_ne_of_nat_degree_ne Polynomial.degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.le_u_l _
#align polynomial.degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align polynomial.le_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.le_degree_of_ne_zero
theorem le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : n ≤ natDegree p := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree]
· exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
· rintro rfl
exact h rfl
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_ne_zero
theorem le_natDegree_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → a ≤ natDegree p :=
le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_mem_supp
theorem degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (pn : p.degree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.degree = n :=
pn.antisymm (le_degree_of_ne_zero p1)
#align polynomial.degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
theorem natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n ≠ 0) :
p.natDegree = n :=
pn.antisymm (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero p1)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
#align polynomial.degree_mono Polynomial.degree_mono
theorem supp_subset_range (h : natDegree p < m) : p.support ⊆ Finset.range m := fun _n hn =>
mem_range.2 <| (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hn).trans_lt h
#align polynomial.supp_subset_range Polynomial.supp_subset_range
theorem supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ : p.support ⊆ Finset.range (natDegree p + 1) :=
supp_subset_range (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
#align polynomial.supp_subset_range_nat_degree_succ Polynomial.supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
#align polynomial.degree_le_degree Polynomial.degree_le_degree
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbot'_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbot'_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_iff_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
#align polynomial.degree_le_of_nat_degree_le Polynomial.degree_le_of_natDegree_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_of_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.monotone_l hpq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_lt_natDegree {p q : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (hpq : p.degree < q.degree) :
p.natDegree < q.natDegree := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· exact (not_lt_bot <| hq ▸ hpq).elim
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq, Nat.cast_lt] at hpq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree_lt_natDegree
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 246 | 248 | theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by |
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.WithDensity
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
#align_import measure_theory.function.strongly_measurable.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3b52265189f3fb43aa631edffce5d060fafaf82f"
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure. We also provide almost everywhere versions of
these notions.
Almost everywhere strongly measurable functions form the largest class of functions that can be
integrated using the Bochner integral.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
* `AEStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `StronglyMeasurable` function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `FinStronglyMeasurable`
function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.sigmaFiniteSet`: a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
## Main statements
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, and for almost everywhere strongly
measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## References
* Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.FinStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure `μ` if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions. -/
def AEStronglyMeasurable
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, StronglyMeasurable g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEFinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions with support with finite measure. -/
def AEFinStronglyMeasurable
[Zero β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, FinStronglyMeasurable g μ ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEFinStronglyMeasurable
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
@[aesop 30% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
⟨f, hf, EventuallyEq.refl _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· have h_univ : f ⁻¹' {x} = Set.univ := by
ext1 y
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [h_univ]
exact MeasurableSet.univ
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable
@[nontriviality]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")]
alias stronglyMeasurable_of_fintype := StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_finite (since := "2024-02-06")]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_finite f
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {b : β} :
StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [One β] :
StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) :=
stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_one MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_one
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_zero MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_zero
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' {α β} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const' MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const'
-- Porting note: changed binding type of `MeasurableSpace α`.
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_const' fun x y => by rw [Subsingleton.elim x y]
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable'
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.approx MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.approx
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.approx_bounded MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx_bounded_of_norm_le MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx_bounded_ae MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approxBounded_ae
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.norm_approx_bounded_le MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.norm_approxBounded_le
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· simp only [@Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' _ _ ⊥ _ _ f,
eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
#align strongly_measurable_bot_iff stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurable_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq]
refine fun n => (measure_biUnion_finset_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
refine ENNReal.sum_lt_top_iff.mpr fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.fin_strongly_measurable_of_set_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.finStronglyMeasurable
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurable
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align continuous.comp_strongly_measurable Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_mul_support MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_mulSupport
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_support MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_support
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mono MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mono
protected theorem prod_mk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prod_mk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.prod_mk MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.prod_mk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.comp_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.of_uncurry_left MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_uncurry_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_right
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.of_uncurry_right MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_uncurry_right
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.add MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.add
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mul_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mul_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.add_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.add_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_mul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_mul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_add MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_add
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.inv MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.inv
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.neg MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.neg
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.div MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.div
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.sub MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [TopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [TopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.smul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.smul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.vadd MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.vadd
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_smul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_smul
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_smul' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk stronglyMeasurable_const)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.smul_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.smul_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.vadd_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.vadd_const
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCommGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a strongly measurable function and a measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable_add
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (f + g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ φ n x + g x) atTop (𝓝 (f + g)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ (hφ x).add tendsto_const_nhds)
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.simpleFunc_add _
end Arithmetic
section MulAction
variable {M G G₀ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M β] [ContinuousConstSMul M β]
variable [Group G] [MulAction G β] [ContinuousConstSMul G β]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [MulAction G₀ β] [ContinuousConstSMul G₀ β]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : G) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
#align strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
nonrec theorem _root_.IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : M}
(hc : IsUnit c) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff u
#align is_unit.strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
#align strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff₀ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀
end MulAction
section Order
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
open Filter
open Filter
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [Sup β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.sup MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.sup
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [Inf β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.inf MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.inf
end Order
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact stronglyMeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
#align list.strongly_measurable_prod' List.stronglyMeasurable_prod'
#align list.strongly_measurable_sum' List.stronglyMeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hl
#align list.strongly_measurable_prod List.stronglyMeasurable_prod
#align list.strongly_measurable_sum List.stronglyMeasurable_sum
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_prod' Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod'
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_sum' Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hs
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_prod Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_sum Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_sum
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Finset.prod_induction _ _ (fun _a _b ha hb => ha.mul hb) (@stronglyMeasurable_one α M _ _ _) hf
#align finset.strongly_measurable_prod' Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod'
#align finset.strongly_measurable_sum' Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a := by
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hf
#align finset.strongly_measurable_prod Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod
#align finset.strongly_measurable_sum Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum
end CommMonoid
/-- The range of a strongly measurable function is separable. -/
protected theorem isSeparable_range {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (range f) := by
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ n, range (hf.approx n))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun n => (hf.approx n).finite_range.isSeparable
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto (hf.tendsto_approx x)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.is_separable_range MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.isSeparable_range
theorem separableSpace_range_union_singleton {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {b : β} :
SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {b} : Set β) :=
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
(hf.isSeparable_range.union (finite_singleton _).isSeparable).separableSpace
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.separable_space_range_union_singleton MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
section SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- In a space with second countable topology, measurable implies strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopology β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (hf : Measurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
nontriviality β; inhabit β
exact ⟨SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf Set.univ default (Set.mem_univ _), fun x ↦
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf (Set.mem_univ _) (by rw [closure_univ]; simp)⟩
#align measurable.strongly_measurable Measurable.stronglyMeasurable
/-- In a space with second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are equivalent. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β] : StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h⟩
#align strongly_measurable_iff_measurable stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_id [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] : StronglyMeasurable (id : α → α) :=
measurable_id.stronglyMeasurable
#align strongly_measurable_id stronglyMeasurable_id
end SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is strongly measurable if and only if it is measurable and has separable
range. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] :
StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f ∧ IsSeparable (range f) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.measurable, H.isSeparable_range⟩, fun ⟨Hm, Hsep⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
have := Hsep.secondCountableTopology
have Hm' : StronglyMeasurable (rangeFactorization f) := Hm.subtype_mk.stronglyMeasurable
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp_stronglyMeasurable Hm'
#align strongly_measurable_iff_measurable_separable stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable
/-- A continuous function is strongly measurable when either the source space or the target space
is second-countable. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize β
cases h.out
· rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.measurable, ?_⟩
exact isSeparable_range hf
· exact hf.measurable.stronglyMeasurable
#align continuous.strongly_measurable Continuous.stronglyMeasurable
/-- A continuous function whose support is contained in a compact set is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) {k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(h'f : mulSupport f ⊆ k) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace β := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨hf.measurable, (isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact hf hk h'f).isSeparable⟩
/-- A continuous function with compact support is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_hasCompactMulSupport
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactMulSupport f) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact h'f (subset_mulTSupport f)
/-- A continuous function with compact support on a product space is strongly measurable for the
product sigma-algebra. The subtlety is that we do not assume that the spaces are separable, so the
product of the Borel sigma algebras might not contain all open sets, but still it contains enough
of them to approximate compactly supported continuous functions. -/
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.stronglyMeasurable_of_prod {X Y : Type*} [Zero α]
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
{f : X × Y → α} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize α
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨h'f.measurable_of_prod hf, ?_⟩
letI : PseudoMetricSpace α := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
exact IsCompact.isSeparable (s := range f) (h'f.isCompact_range hf)
/-- If `g` is a topological embedding, then `f` is strongly measurable iff `g ∘ f` is. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 758 | 775 | theorem _root_.Embedding.comp_stronglyMeasurable_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : Embedding g) : (StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x)) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f := by |
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric γ
borelize β γ
refine
⟨fun H => stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun H =>
hg.continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable H⟩
· let G : β → range g := rangeFactorization g
have hG : ClosedEmbedding G :=
{ hg.codRestrict _ _ with
isClosed_range := by
rw [surjective_onto_range.range_eq]
exact isClosed_univ }
have : Measurable (G ∘ f) := Measurable.subtype_mk H.measurable
exact hG.measurableEmbedding.measurable_comp_iff.1 this
· have : IsSeparable (g ⁻¹' range (g ∘ f)) := hg.isSeparable_preimage H.isSeparable_range
rwa [range_comp, hg.inj.preimage_image] at this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NthRewrite
#align_import data.nat.gcd.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Definitions and properties of `Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, and `Nat.coprime`
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `GCDMonoid.gcd` and
`GCDMonoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `IsCoprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `Nat.coprime`, see
`Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
-/
namespace Nat
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
#align nat.gcd_greatest Nat.gcd_greatest
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + k * m) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + k * m), gcd_rec m n]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_right_right Nat.gcd_add_mul_right_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m * k) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + m * k), gcd_rec m n]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right Nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (k * m + n) = gcd m n := by simp [add_comm _ n]
#align nat.gcd_mul_right_add_right Nat.gcd_mul_right_add_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (m * k + n) = gcd m n := by simp [add_comm _ n]
#align nat.gcd_mul_left_add_right Nat.gcd_mul_left_add_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m + k * n) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_mul_right_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_right_left Nat.gcd_add_mul_right_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m + n * k) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_mul_left_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_left_left Nat.gcd_add_mul_left_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (k * n + m) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_right_add_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_mul_right_add_left Nat.gcd_mul_right_add_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (n * k + m) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_left_add_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_mul_left_add_left Nat.gcd_mul_left_add_left
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of an addition of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_self_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m) = gcd m n :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (gcd_add_mul_right_right m n 1)
#align nat.gcd_add_self_right Nat.gcd_add_self_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_self_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m + n) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_self_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_self_left Nat.gcd_add_self_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_add_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m + n) m = gcd n m := by rw [add_comm, gcd_add_self_left]
#align nat.gcd_self_add_left Nat.gcd_self_add_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_add_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (m + n) = gcd m n := by
rw [add_comm, gcd_add_self_right]
#align nat.gcd_self_add_right Nat.gcd_self_add_right
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of a subtraction of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem gcd_sub_self_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd (n - m) m = gcd n m := by
calc
gcd (n - m) m = gcd (n - m + m) m := by rw [← gcd_add_self_left (n - m) m]
_ = gcd n m := by rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_sub_self_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd m (n - m) = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_sub_self_left h, gcd_comm]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_sub_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd (n - m) n = gcd m n := by
have := Nat.sub_add_cancel h
rw [gcd_comm m n, ← this, gcd_add_self_left (n - m) m]
have : gcd (n - m) n = gcd (n - m) m := by
nth_rw 2 [← Nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
rw [gcd_add_self_right, gcd_comm]
convert this
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_sub_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd n (n - m) = gcd n m := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_self_sub_left h, gcd_comm]
/-! ### `lcm` -/
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
#align nat.lcm_dvd_mul Nat.lcm_dvd_mul
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩, and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
#align nat.lcm_dvd_iff Nat.lcm_dvd_iff
theorem lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n := by
simp_rw [pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact lcm_ne_zero
#align nat.lcm_pos Nat.lcm_pos
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = m * n.lcm k := by
apply dvd_antisymm
· exact lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_left n k)) (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_right n k))
· have h : m ∣ lcm (m * n) (m * k) := (dvd_mul_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (m * n) (m * k))
rw [← dvd_div_iff h, lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_div_iff h, dvd_div_iff h, ← lcm_dvd_iff]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * n := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm k n, lcm_mul_left, mul_comm]
/-!
### `Coprime`
See also `Nat.coprime_of_dvd` and `Nat.coprime_of_dvd'` to prove `Nat.Coprime m n`.
-/
instance (m n : ℕ) : Decidable (Coprime m n) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (gcd m n = 1))
theorem Coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [← one_mul (lcm m n), ← h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
#align nat.coprime.lcm_eq_mul Nat.Coprime.lcm_eq_mul
theorem Coprime.symmetric : Symmetric Coprime := fun _ _ => Coprime.symm
#align nat.coprime.symmetric Nat.Coprime.symmetric
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k n) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ m :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h n⟩
#align nat.coprime.dvd_mul_right Nat.Coprime.dvd_mul_right
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k m) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ n :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_right h m⟩
#align nat.coprime.dvd_mul_left Nat.Coprime.dvd_mul_left
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (n + m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_right]
#align nat.coprime_add_self_right Nat.coprime_add_self_right
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [add_comm, coprime_add_self_right]
#align nat.coprime_self_add_right Nat.coprime_self_add_right
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_left]
#align nat.coprime_add_self_left Nat.coprime_add_self_left
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_add_left]
#align nat.coprime_self_add_left Nat.coprime_self_add_left
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (n + k * m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_right]
#align nat.coprime_add_mul_right_right Nat.coprime_add_mul_right_right
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (n + m * k) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_right]
#align nat.coprime_add_mul_left_right Nat.coprime_add_mul_left_right
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (k * m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_right]
#align nat.coprime_mul_right_add_right Nat.coprime_mul_right_add_right
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (m * k + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_right]
#align nat.coprime_mul_left_add_right Nat.coprime_mul_left_add_right
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (m + k * n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_left]
#align nat.coprime_add_mul_right_left Nat.coprime_add_mul_right_left
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (m + n * k) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_left]
#align nat.coprime_add_mul_left_left Nat.coprime_add_mul_left_left
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (k * n + m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_left]
#align nat.coprime_mul_right_add_left Nat.coprime_mul_right_add_left
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (n * k + m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_left]
#align nat.coprime_mul_left_add_left Nat.coprime_mul_left_add_left
@[simp]
theorem coprime_sub_self_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime (n - m) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_sub_self_left h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_sub_self_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime m (n - m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_sub_self_right h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_sub_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime (n - m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_sub_left h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_sub_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime n (n - m) ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_sub_right h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_pow_left_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a b : ℕ) :
Nat.Coprime (a ^ n) b ↔ Nat.Coprime a b := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne'
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.coprime_mul_iff_left]
exact ⟨And.right, fun hab => ⟨hab.pow_left _, hab⟩⟩
#align nat.coprime_pow_left_iff Nat.coprime_pow_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem coprime_pow_right_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a b : ℕ) :
Nat.Coprime a (b ^ n) ↔ Nat.Coprime a b := by
rw [Nat.coprime_comm, coprime_pow_left_iff hn, Nat.coprime_comm]
#align nat.coprime_pow_right_iff Nat.coprime_pow_right_iff
theorem not_coprime_zero_zero : ¬Coprime 0 0 := by simp
#align nat.not_coprime_zero_zero Nat.not_coprime_zero_zero
theorem coprime_one_left_iff (n : ℕ) : Coprime 1 n ↔ True := by simp [Coprime]
#align nat.coprime_one_left_iff Nat.coprime_one_left_iff
theorem coprime_one_right_iff (n : ℕ) : Coprime n 1 ↔ True := by simp [Coprime]
#align nat.coprime_one_right_iff Nat.coprime_one_right_iff
theorem gcd_mul_of_coprime_of_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (hac : Coprime a c) (b_dvd_c : b ∣ c) :
gcd (a * b) c = b := by
rcases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd b_dvd_c with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [gcd_mul_right]
convert one_mul b
exact Coprime.coprime_mul_right_right hac
#align nat.gcd_mul_of_coprime_of_dvd Nat.gcd_mul_of_coprime_of_dvd
theorem Coprime.eq_of_mul_eq_zero {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) (hmn : m * n = 0) :
m = 0 ∧ n = 1 ∨ m = 1 ∧ n = 0 :=
(Nat.eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hmn).imp (fun hm => ⟨hm, n.coprime_zero_left.mp <| hm ▸ h⟩) fun hn =>
let eq := hn ▸ h.symm
⟨m.coprime_zero_left.mp <| eq, hn⟩
#align nat.coprime.eq_of_mul_eq_zero Nat.Coprime.eq_of_mul_eq_zero
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`.
See `exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul` for the more general but less constructive version for other
`GCDMonoid`s. -/
def prodDvdAndDvdOfDvdProd {m n k : ℕ} (H : k ∣ m * n) :
{ d : { m' // m' ∣ m } × { n' // n' ∣ n } // k = d.1 * d.2 } := by
cases h0 : gcd k m with
| zero =>
obtain rfl : k = 0 := eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
obtain rfl : m = 0 := eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
exact ⟨⟨⟨0, dvd_refl 0⟩, ⟨n, dvd_refl n⟩⟩, (zero_mul n).symm⟩
| succ tmp =>
have hpos : 0 < gcd k m := h0.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_succ _; clear h0 tmp
have hd : gcd k m * (k / gcd k m) = k := Nat.mul_div_cancel' (gcd_dvd_left k m)
refine ⟨⟨⟨gcd k m, gcd_dvd_right k m⟩, ⟨k / gcd k m, ?_⟩⟩, hd.symm⟩
apply Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left hpos
rw [hd, ← gcd_mul_right]
exact dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) H
#align nat.prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod Nat.prodDvdAndDvdOfDvdProd
theorem dvd_mul {x m n : ℕ} : x ∣ m * n ↔ ∃ y z, y ∣ m ∧ z ∣ n ∧ y * z = x := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨⟨⟨y, hy⟩, ⟨z, hz⟩⟩, rfl⟩ := prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod h
exact ⟨y, z, hy, hz, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨y, z, hy, hz, rfl⟩
exact mul_dvd_mul hy hz
#align nat.dvd_mul Nat.dvd_mul
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff {a b n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ∣ b ^ n ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd h _⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (gcd a b) with g0 | g0
· simp [eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right g0]
rcases exists_coprime' g0 with ⟨g, a', b', g0', co, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [mul_pow, mul_pow] at h
replace h := Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (pow_pos g0' _) h
have := pow_dvd_pow a' <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0
rw [pow_one, (co.pow n n).eq_one_of_dvd h] at this
simp [eq_one_of_dvd_one this]
#align nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff
theorem coprime_iff_isRelPrime {m n : ℕ} : m.Coprime n ↔ IsRelPrime m n := by
simp_rw [coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, IsRelPrime, ← and_imp, ← dvd_gcd_iff, isUnit_iff_dvd_one]
exact ⟨fun h _ ↦ (h ▸ ·), (dvd_one.mp <| · dvd_rfl)⟩
/-- If `k:ℕ` divides coprime `a` and `b` then `k = 1` -/
theorem eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes {a b k : ℕ} (h_ab_coprime : Coprime a b) (hka : k ∣ a)
(hkb : k ∣ b) : k = 1 :=
dvd_one.mp (isUnit_iff_dvd_one.mp <| coprime_iff_isRelPrime.mp h_ab_coprime hka hkb)
#align nat.eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes Nat.eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 330 | 343 | theorem Coprime.mul_add_mul_ne_mul {m n a b : ℕ} (cop : Coprime m n) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * m + b * n ≠ m * n := by |
intro h
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ : n ∣ a :=
cop.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
((Nat.dvd_add_iff_left (Nat.dvd_mul_left n b)).mpr
((congr_arg _ h).mpr (Nat.dvd_mul_left n m)))
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ : m ∣ b :=
cop.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
((Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (Nat.dvd_mul_left m (n * x))).mpr
((congr_arg _ h).mpr (Nat.dvd_mul_right m n)))
rw [mul_comm, mul_ne_zero_iff, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
refine mul_ne_zero hb.2 ha.2 (eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_left (ne_of_gt (add_le_add ha.1 hb.1)) ?_)
rw [← mul_assoc, ← h, add_mul, add_mul, mul_comm _ n, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm y]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Ines Wright, Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Solvable
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Sylow
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
#align_import group_theory.nilpotent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2bbc7e3884ba234309d2a43b19144105a753292e"
/-!
# Nilpotent groups
An API for nilpotent groups, that is, groups for which the upper central series
reaches `⊤`.
## Main definitions
Recall that if `H K : Subgroup G` then `⁅H, K⁆ : Subgroup G` is the subgroup of `G` generated
by the commutators `hkh⁻¹k⁻¹`. Recall also Lean's conventions that `⊤` denotes the
subgroup `G` of `G`, and `⊥` denotes the trivial subgroup `{1}`.
* `upperCentralSeries G : ℕ → Subgroup G` : the upper central series of a group `G`.
This is an increasing sequence of normal subgroups `H n` of `G` with `H 0 = ⊥` and
`H (n + 1) / H n` is the centre of `G / H n`.
* `lowerCentralSeries G : ℕ → Subgroup G` : the lower central series of a group `G`.
This is a decreasing sequence of normal subgroups `H n` of `G` with `H 0 = ⊤` and
`H (n + 1) = ⁅H n, G⁆`.
* `IsNilpotent` : A group G is nilpotent if its upper central series reaches `⊤`, or
equivalently if its lower central series reaches `⊥`.
* `nilpotency_class` : the length of the upper central series of a nilpotent group.
* `IsAscendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop` and
* `IsDescendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop` : Note that in the literature
a "central series" for a group is usually defined to be a *finite* sequence of normal subgroups
`H 0`, `H 1`, ..., starting at `⊤`, finishing at `⊥`, and with each `H n / H (n + 1)`
central in `G / H (n + 1)`. In this formalisation it is convenient to have two weaker predicates
on an infinite sequence of subgroups `H n` of `G`: we say a sequence is a *descending central
series* if it starts at `G` and `⁅H n, ⊤⁆ ⊆ H (n + 1)` for all `n`. Note that this series
may not terminate at `⊥`, and the `H i` need not be normal. Similarly a sequence is an
*ascending central series* if `H 0 = ⊥` and `⁅H (n + 1), ⊤⁆ ⊆ H n` for all `n`, again with no
requirement that the series reaches `⊤` or that the `H i` are normal.
## Main theorems
`G` is *defined* to be nilpotent if the upper central series reaches `⊤`.
* `nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series` : `G` is nilpotent iff some ascending central
series reaches `⊤`.
* `nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series` : `G` is nilpotent iff some descending central
series reaches `⊥`.
* `nilpotent_iff_lower` : `G` is nilpotent iff the lower central series reaches `⊥`.
* The `nilpotency_class` can likewise be obtained from these equivalent
definitions, see `least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass`,
`least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass` and
`lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass`.
* If `G` is nilpotent, then so are its subgroups, images, quotients and preimages.
Binary and finite products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent.
Infinite products are nilpotent if their nilpotent class is bounded.
Corresponding lemmas about the `nilpotency_class` are provided.
* The `nilpotency_class` of `G ⧸ center G` is given explicitly, and an induction principle
is derived from that.
* `IsNilpotent.to_isSolvable`: If `G` is nilpotent, it is solvable.
## Warning
A "central series" is usually defined to be a finite sequence of normal subgroups going
from `⊥` to `⊤` with the property that each subquotient is contained within the centre of
the associated quotient of `G`. This means that if `G` is not nilpotent, then
none of what we have called `upperCentralSeries G`, `lowerCentralSeries G` or
the sequences satisfying `IsAscendingCentralSeries` or `IsDescendingCentralSeries`
are actually central series. Note that the fact that the upper and lower central series
are not central series if `G` is not nilpotent is a standard abuse of notation.
-/
open Subgroup
section WithGroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H]
/-- If `H` is a normal subgroup of `G`, then the set `{x : G | ∀ y : G, x*y*x⁻¹*y⁻¹ ∈ H}`
is a subgroup of `G` (because it is the preimage in `G` of the centre of the
quotient group `G/H`.)
-/
def upperCentralSeriesStep : Subgroup G where
carrier := { x : G | ∀ y : G, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' y := by simp [Subgroup.one_mem]
mul_mem' {a b ha hb y} := by
convert Subgroup.mul_mem _ (ha (b * y * b⁻¹)) (hb y) using 1
group
inv_mem' {x hx y} := by
specialize hx y⁻¹
rw [mul_assoc, inv_inv] at hx ⊢
exact Subgroup.Normal.mem_comm inferInstance hx
#align upper_central_series_step upperCentralSeriesStep
theorem mem_upperCentralSeriesStep (x : G) :
x ∈ upperCentralSeriesStep H ↔ ∀ y, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H := Iff.rfl
#align mem_upper_central_series_step mem_upperCentralSeriesStep
open QuotientGroup
/-- The proof that `upperCentralSeriesStep H` is the preimage of the centre of `G/H` under
the canonical surjection. -/
theorem upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center :
upperCentralSeriesStep H = Subgroup.comap (mk' H) (center (G ⧸ H)) := by
ext
rw [mem_comap, mem_center_iff, forall_mk]
apply forall_congr'
intro y
rw [coe_mk', ← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, ← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, eq_comm, eq_iff_div_mem,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc]
#align upper_central_series_step_eq_comap_center upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center
instance : Normal (upperCentralSeriesStep H) := by
rw [upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center]
infer_instance
variable (G)
/-- An auxiliary type-theoretic definition defining both the upper central series of
a group, and a proof that it is normal, all in one go. -/
def upperCentralSeriesAux : ℕ → Σ'H : Subgroup G, Normal H
| 0 => ⟨⊥, inferInstance⟩
| n + 1 =>
let un := upperCentralSeriesAux n
let _un_normal := un.2
⟨upperCentralSeriesStep un.1, inferInstance⟩
#align upper_central_series_aux upperCentralSeriesAux
/-- `upperCentralSeries G n` is the `n`th term in the upper central series of `G`. -/
def upperCentralSeries (n : ℕ) : Subgroup G :=
(upperCentralSeriesAux G n).1
#align upper_central_series upperCentralSeries
instance upperCentralSeries_normal (n : ℕ) : Normal (upperCentralSeries G n) :=
(upperCentralSeriesAux G n).2
@[simp]
theorem upperCentralSeries_zero : upperCentralSeries G 0 = ⊥ := rfl
#align upper_central_series_zero upperCentralSeries_zero
@[simp]
theorem upperCentralSeries_one : upperCentralSeries G 1 = center G := by
ext
simp only [upperCentralSeries, upperCentralSeriesAux, upperCentralSeriesStep,
Subgroup.mem_center_iff, mem_mk, mem_bot, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact forall_congr' fun y => by rw [mul_inv_eq_one, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, eq_comm]
#align upper_central_series_one upperCentralSeries_one
/-- The `n+1`st term of the upper central series `H i` has underlying set equal to the `x` such
that `⁅x,G⁆ ⊆ H n`-/
theorem mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff (n : ℕ) (x : G) :
x ∈ upperCentralSeries G (n + 1) ↔ ∀ y : G, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ upperCentralSeries G n :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_upper_central_series_succ_iff mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff
-- is_nilpotent is already defined in the root namespace (for elements of rings).
/-- A group `G` is nilpotent if its upper central series is eventually `G`. -/
class Group.IsNilpotent (G : Type*) [Group G] : Prop where
nilpotent' : ∃ n : ℕ, upperCentralSeries G n = ⊤
#align group.is_nilpotent Group.IsNilpotent
-- Porting note: add lemma since infer kinds are unsupported in the definition of `IsNilpotent`
lemma Group.IsNilpotent.nilpotent (G : Type*) [Group G] [IsNilpotent G] :
∃ n : ℕ, upperCentralSeries G n = ⊤ := Group.IsNilpotent.nilpotent'
open Group
variable {G}
/-- A sequence of subgroups of `G` is an ascending central series if `H 0` is trivial and
`⁅H (n + 1), G⁆ ⊆ H n` for all `n`. Note that we do not require that `H n = G` for some `n`. -/
def IsAscendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop :=
H 0 = ⊥ ∧ ∀ (x : G) (n : ℕ), x ∈ H (n + 1) → ∀ g, x * g * x⁻¹ * g⁻¹ ∈ H n
#align is_ascending_central_series IsAscendingCentralSeries
/-- A sequence of subgroups of `G` is a descending central series if `H 0` is `G` and
`⁅H n, G⁆ ⊆ H (n + 1)` for all `n`. Note that we do not require that `H n = {1}` for some `n`. -/
def IsDescendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) :=
H 0 = ⊤ ∧ ∀ (x : G) (n : ℕ), x ∈ H n → ∀ g, x * g * x⁻¹ * g⁻¹ ∈ H (n + 1)
#align is_descending_central_series IsDescendingCentralSeries
/-- Any ascending central series for a group is bounded above by the upper central series. -/
theorem ascending_central_series_le_upper (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) (hH : IsAscendingCentralSeries H) :
∀ n : ℕ, H n ≤ upperCentralSeries G n
| 0 => hH.1.symm ▸ le_refl ⊥
| n + 1 => by
intro x hx
rw [mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff]
exact fun y => ascending_central_series_le_upper H hH n (hH.2 x n hx y)
#align ascending_central_series_le_upper ascending_central_series_le_upper
variable (G)
/-- The upper central series of a group is an ascending central series. -/
theorem upperCentralSeries_isAscendingCentralSeries :
IsAscendingCentralSeries (upperCentralSeries G) :=
⟨rfl, fun _x _n h => h⟩
#align upper_central_series_is_ascending_central_series upperCentralSeries_isAscendingCentralSeries
theorem upperCentralSeries_mono : Monotone (upperCentralSeries G) := by
refine monotone_nat_of_le_succ ?_
intro n x hx y
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc y x⁻¹ y⁻¹]
exact mul_mem hx (Normal.conj_mem (upperCentralSeries_normal G n) x⁻¹ (inv_mem hx) y)
#align upper_central_series_mono upperCentralSeries_mono
/-- A group `G` is nilpotent iff there exists an ascending central series which reaches `G` in
finitely many steps. -/
theorem nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series :
IsNilpotent G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ∃ H : ℕ → Subgroup G, IsAscendingCentralSeries H ∧ H n = ⊤ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, nH⟩
exact ⟨_, _, upperCentralSeries_isAscendingCentralSeries G, nH⟩
· rintro ⟨n, H, hH, hn⟩
use n
rw [eq_top_iff, ← hn]
exact ascending_central_series_le_upper H hH n
#align nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series
theorem is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending {H : ℕ → Subgroup G} {n : ℕ} (hn : H n = ⊤)
(hasc : IsAscendingCentralSeries H) : IsDescendingCentralSeries fun m : ℕ => H (n - m) := by
cases' hasc with h0 hH
refine ⟨hn, fun x m hx g => ?_⟩
dsimp at hx
by_cases hm : n ≤ m
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_of_le hm, h0, Subgroup.mem_bot] at hx
subst hx
rw [show (1 : G) * g * (1⁻¹ : G) * g⁻¹ = 1 by group]
exact Subgroup.one_mem _
· push_neg at hm
apply hH
convert hx using 1
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hm), Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
#align is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending
theorem is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending {H : ℕ → Subgroup G} {n : ℕ} (hn : H n = ⊥)
(hdesc : IsDescendingCentralSeries H) : IsAscendingCentralSeries fun m : ℕ => H (n - m) := by
cases' hdesc with h0 hH
refine ⟨hn, fun x m hx g => ?_⟩
dsimp only at hx ⊢
by_cases hm : n ≤ m
· have hnm : n - m = 0 := tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hm
rw [hnm, h0]
exact mem_top _
· push_neg at hm
convert hH x _ hx g using 1
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hm), Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
#align is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending
/-- A group `G` is nilpotent iff there exists a descending central series which reaches the
trivial group in a finite time. -/
theorem nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series :
IsNilpotent G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ∃ H : ℕ → Subgroup G, IsDescendingCentralSeries H ∧ H n = ⊥ := by
rw [nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, H, hH, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun m => H (n - m), is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending G hn hH, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [tsub_self]
exact hH.1
· rintro ⟨n, H, hH, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun m => H (n - m), is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending G hn hH, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [tsub_self]
exact hH.1
#align nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series
/-- The lower central series of a group `G` is a sequence `H n` of subgroups of `G`, defined
by `H 0` is all of `G` and for `n≥1`, `H (n + 1) = ⁅H n, G⁆` -/
def lowerCentralSeries (G : Type*) [Group G] : ℕ → Subgroup G
| 0 => ⊤
| n + 1 => ⁅lowerCentralSeries G n, ⊤⁆
#align lower_central_series lowerCentralSeries
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries G 0 = ⊤ := rfl
#align lower_central_series_zero lowerCentralSeries_zero
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_one : lowerCentralSeries G 1 = commutator G := rfl
#align lower_central_series_one lowerCentralSeries_one
theorem mem_lowerCentralSeries_succ_iff (n : ℕ) (q : G) :
q ∈ lowerCentralSeries G (n + 1) ↔
q ∈ closure { x | ∃ p ∈ lowerCentralSeries G n,
∃ q ∈ (⊤ : Subgroup G), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ = x } := Iff.rfl
#align mem_lower_central_series_succ_iff mem_lowerCentralSeries_succ_iff
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ (n : ℕ) :
lowerCentralSeries G (n + 1) =
closure { x | ∃ p ∈ lowerCentralSeries G n, ∃ q ∈ (⊤ : Subgroup G), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ = x } :=
rfl
#align lower_central_series_succ lowerCentralSeries_succ
instance lowerCentralSeries_normal (n : ℕ) : Normal (lowerCentralSeries G n) := by
induction' n with d hd
· exact (⊤ : Subgroup G).normal_of_characteristic
· exact @Subgroup.commutator_normal _ _ (lowerCentralSeries G d) ⊤ hd _
theorem lowerCentralSeries_antitone : Antitone (lowerCentralSeries G) := by
refine antitone_nat_of_succ_le fun n x hx => ?_
simp only [mem_lowerCentralSeries_succ_iff, exists_prop, mem_top, exists_true_left,
true_and_iff] at hx
refine
closure_induction hx ?_ (Subgroup.one_mem _) (@Subgroup.mul_mem _ _ _) (@Subgroup.inv_mem _ _ _)
rintro y ⟨z, hz, a, ha⟩
rw [← ha, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc a z⁻¹ a⁻¹]
exact mul_mem hz (Normal.conj_mem (lowerCentralSeries_normal n) z⁻¹ (inv_mem hz) a)
#align lower_central_series_antitone lowerCentralSeries_antitone
/-- The lower central series of a group is a descending central series. -/
theorem lowerCentralSeries_isDescendingCentralSeries :
IsDescendingCentralSeries (lowerCentralSeries G) := by
constructor
· rfl
intro x n hxn g
exact commutator_mem_commutator hxn (mem_top g)
#align lower_central_series_is_descending_central_series lowerCentralSeries_isDescendingCentralSeries
/-- Any descending central series for a group is bounded below by the lower central series. -/
theorem descending_central_series_ge_lower (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) (hH : IsDescendingCentralSeries H) :
∀ n : ℕ, lowerCentralSeries G n ≤ H n
| 0 => hH.1.symm ▸ le_refl ⊤
| n + 1 => commutator_le.mpr fun x hx q _ =>
hH.2 x n (descending_central_series_ge_lower H hH n hx) q
#align descending_central_series_ge_lower descending_central_series_ge_lower
/-- A group is nilpotent if and only if its lower central series eventually reaches
the trivial subgroup. -/
theorem nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries : IsNilpotent G ↔ ∃ n, lowerCentralSeries G n = ⊥ := by
rw [nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, H, ⟨h0, hs⟩, hn⟩
use n
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hn]
exact descending_central_series_ge_lower H ⟨h0, hs⟩ n
· rintro ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, lowerCentralSeries G, lowerCentralSeries_isDescendingCentralSeries, hn⟩
#align nilpotent_iff_lower_central_series nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries
section Classical
open scoped Classical
variable [hG : IsNilpotent G]
variable (G)
/-- The nilpotency class of a nilpotent group is the smallest natural `n` such that
the `n`'th term of the upper central series is `G`. -/
noncomputable def Group.nilpotencyClass : ℕ := Nat.find (IsNilpotent.nilpotent G)
#align group.nilpotency_class Group.nilpotencyClass
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem upperCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass : upperCentralSeries G (Group.nilpotencyClass G) = ⊤ :=
Nat.find_spec (IsNilpotent.nilpotent G)
#align upper_central_series_nilpotency_class upperCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass
theorem upperCentralSeries_eq_top_iff_nilpotencyClass_le {n : ℕ} :
upperCentralSeries G n = ⊤ ↔ Group.nilpotencyClass G ≤ n := by
constructor
· intro h
exact Nat.find_le h
· intro h
rw [eq_top_iff, ← upperCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass]
exact upperCentralSeries_mono _ h
#align upper_central_series_eq_top_iff_nilpotency_class_le upperCentralSeries_eq_top_iff_nilpotencyClass_le
/-- The nilpotency class of a nilpotent `G` is equal to the smallest `n` for which an ascending
central series reaches `G` in its `n`'th term. -/
theorem least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass :
Nat.find ((nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series G).mp hG) =
Group.nilpotencyClass G := by
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_mono ?_) (Nat.find_mono ?_)
· intro n hn
exact ⟨upperCentralSeries G, upperCentralSeries_isAscendingCentralSeries G, hn⟩
· rintro n ⟨H, ⟨hH, hn⟩⟩
rw [← top_le_iff, ← hn]
exact ascending_central_series_le_upper H hH n
#align least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotency_class least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass
/-- The nilpotency class of a nilpotent `G` is equal to the smallest `n` for which the descending
central series reaches `⊥` in its `n`'th term. -/
theorem least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass :
Nat.find ((nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series G).mp hG) =
Group.nilpotencyClass G := by
rw [← least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_mono ?_) (Nat.find_mono ?_)
· rintro n ⟨H, ⟨hH, hn⟩⟩
refine ⟨fun m => H (n - m), is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending G hn hH, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [tsub_self]
exact hH.1
· rintro n ⟨H, ⟨hH, hn⟩⟩
refine ⟨fun m => H (n - m), is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending G hn hH, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [tsub_self]
exact hH.1
#align least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotency_class least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass
/-- The nilpotency class of a nilpotent `G` is equal to the length of the lower central series. -/
theorem lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass :
Nat.find (nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries.mp hG) = Group.nilpotencyClass (G := G) := by
rw [← least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_mono ?_) (Nat.find_mono ?_)
· rintro n ⟨H, ⟨hH, hn⟩⟩
rw [← le_bot_iff, ← hn]
exact descending_central_series_ge_lower H hH n
· rintro n h
exact ⟨lowerCentralSeries G, ⟨lowerCentralSeries_isDescendingCentralSeries, h⟩⟩
#align lower_central_series_length_eq_nilpotency_class lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass
@[simp]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Nilpotent.lean | 427 | 430 | theorem lowerCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass :
lowerCentralSeries G (Group.nilpotencyClass G) = ⊥ := by |
rw [← lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
exact Nat.find_spec (nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries.mp hG)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDenseLp
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsLemma
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
#align_import measure_theory.function.continuous_map_dense from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e0736bb5b48bdadbca19dbd857e12bee38ccfbb8"
/-!
# Approximation in Lᵖ by continuous functions
This file proves that bounded continuous functions are dense in `Lp E p μ`, for `p < ∞`, if the
domain `α` of the functions is a normal topological space and the measure `μ` is weakly regular.
It also proves the same results for approximation by continuous functions with compact support
when the space is locally compact and `μ` is regular.
The result is presented in several versions. First concrete versions giving an approximation
up to `ε` in these various contexts, and then abstract versions stating that the topological
closure of the relevant subgroups of `Lp` are the whole space.
* `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le` states that, in a locally compact
space, an `ℒp` function can be approximated by continuous functions with compact support,
in the sense that `snorm (f - g) p μ` is small.
* `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_rpow_sub_le`: same result, but expressed in
terms of `∫ ‖f - g‖^p`.
Versions with `Integrable` instead of `Memℒp` are specialized to the case `p = 1`.
Versions with `boundedContinuous` instead of `HasCompactSupport` drop the locally
compact assumption and give only approximation by a bounded continuous function.
* `MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction_dense`: The subgroup
`MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction` of `Lp E p μ`, the additive subgroup of
`Lp E p μ` consisting of equivalence classes containing a continuous representative, is dense in
`Lp E p μ`.
* `BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp_denseRange`: For finite-measure `μ`, the continuous linear
map `BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp p μ 𝕜` from `α →ᵇ E` to `Lp E p μ` has dense range.
* `ContinuousMap.toLp_denseRange`: For compact `α` and finite-measure `μ`, the continuous linear
map `ContinuousMap.toLp p μ 𝕜` from `C(α, E)` to `Lp E p μ` has dense range.
Note that for `p = ∞` this result is not true: the characteristic function of the set `[0, ∞)` in
`ℝ` cannot be continuously approximated in `L∞`.
The proof is in three steps. First, since simple functions are dense in `Lp`, it suffices to prove
the result for a scalar multiple of a characteristic function of a measurable set `s`. Secondly,
since the measure `μ` is weakly regular, the set `s` can be approximated above by an open set and
below by a closed set. Finally, since the domain `α` is normal, we use Urysohn's lemma to find a
continuous function interpolating between these two sets.
## Related results
Are you looking for a result on "directional" approximation (above or below with respect to an
order) of functions whose codomain is `ℝ≥0∞` or `ℝ`, by semicontinuous functions? See the
Vitali-Carathéodory theorem, in the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/VitaliCaratheodory.lean`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology BoundedContinuousFunction
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace ContinuousMap Set Bornology
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [T4Space α] [BorelSpace α]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {μ : Measure α} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- A variant of Urysohn's lemma, `ℒ^p` version, for an outer regular measure `μ`:
consider two sets `s ⊆ u` which are respectively closed and open with `μ s < ∞`, and a vector `c`.
Then one may find a continuous function `f` equal to `c` on `s` and to `0` outside of `u`,
bounded by `‖c‖` everywhere, and such that the `ℒ^p` norm of `f - s.indicator (fun y ↦ c)` is
arbitrarily small. Additionally, this function `f` belongs to `ℒ^p`. -/
theorem exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed [μ.OuterRegular] (hp : p ≠ ∞) {s u : Set α}
(s_closed : IsClosed s) (u_open : IsOpen u) (hsu : s ⊆ u) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ f : α → E,
Continuous f ∧
snorm (fun x => f x - s.indicator (fun _y => c) x) p μ ≤ ε ∧
(∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖c‖) ∧ Function.support f ⊆ u ∧ Memℒp f p μ := by
obtain ⟨η, η_pos, hη⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _x => c) p μ ≤ ε :=
exists_snorm_indicator_le hp c hε
have ηpos : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < η := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 η_pos
obtain ⟨V, sV, V_open, h'V, hV⟩ : ∃ (V : Set α), V ⊇ s ∧ IsOpen V ∧ μ V < ∞ ∧ μ (V \ s) < η :=
s_closed.measurableSet.exists_isOpen_diff_lt hs ηpos.ne'
let v := u ∩ V
have hsv : s ⊆ v := subset_inter hsu sV
have hμv : μ v < ∞ := (measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt h'V
obtain ⟨g, hgv, hgs, hg_range⟩ :=
exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed (u_open.inter V_open).isClosed_compl s_closed
(disjoint_compl_left_iff.2 hsv)
-- Multiply this by `c` to get a continuous approximation to the function `f`; the key point is
-- that this is pointwise bounded by the indicator of the set `v \ s`, which has small measure.
have g_norm : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ = g x := fun x => by rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (hg_range x).1]
have gc_bd0 : ∀ x, ‖g x • c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ := by
intro x
simp only [norm_smul, g_norm x]
apply mul_le_of_le_one_left (norm_nonneg _)
exact (hg_range x).2
have gc_bd :
∀ x, ‖g x • c - s.indicator (fun _x => c) x‖ ≤ ‖(v \ s).indicator (fun _x => c) x‖ := by
intro x
by_cases hv : x ∈ v
· rw [← Set.diff_union_of_subset hsv] at hv
cases' hv with hsv hs
· simpa only [hsv.2, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, sub_zero, hsv,
Set.indicator_of_mem] using gc_bd0 x
· simp [hgs hs, hs]
· simp [hgv hv, show x ∉ s from fun h => hv (hsv h)]
have gc_support : (Function.support fun x : α => g x • c) ⊆ v := by
refine Function.support_subset_iff'.2 fun x hx => ?_
simp only [hgv hx, Pi.zero_apply, zero_smul]
have gc_mem : Memℒp (fun x => g x • c) p μ := by
refine Memℒp.smul_of_top_left (memℒp_top_const _) ?_
refine ⟨g.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
have : snorm (v.indicator fun _x => (1 : ℝ)) p μ < ⊤ := by
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, hμv.ne, nnnorm_one, ENNReal.coe_one, one_div, one_mul, Ne,
ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, inv_lt_zero, false_and_iff, or_false_iff, not_and, not_lt,
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, imp_true_iff]
refine (snorm_mono fun x => ?_).trans_lt this
by_cases hx : x ∈ v
· simp only [hx, abs_of_nonneg (hg_range x).1, (hg_range x).2, Real.norm_eq_abs,
indicator_of_mem, CstarRing.norm_one]
· simp only [hgv hx, Pi.zero_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_zero, abs_nonneg]
refine
⟨fun x => g x • c, g.continuous.smul continuous_const, (snorm_mono gc_bd).trans ?_, gc_bd0,
gc_support.trans inter_subset_left, gc_mem⟩
exact hη _ ((measure_mono (diff_subset_diff inter_subset_right Subset.rfl)).trans hV.le)
#align measure_theory.exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed MeasureTheory.exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed
/-- In a locally compact space, any function in `ℒp` can be approximated by compactly supported
continuous functions when `p < ∞`, version in terms of `snorm`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ContinuousMapDense.lean | 139 | 188 | theorem Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] [μ.Regular]
(hp : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → E, HasCompactSupport g ∧ snorm (f - g) p μ ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Memℒp g p μ := by |
suffices H :
∃ g : α → E, snorm (f - g) p μ ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Memℒp g p μ ∧ HasCompactSupport g by
rcases H with ⟨g, hg, g_cont, g_mem, g_support⟩
exact ⟨g, g_support, hg, g_cont, g_mem⟩
-- It suffices to check that the set of functions we consider approximates characteristic
-- functions, is stable under addition and consists of ae strongly measurable functions.
-- First check the latter easy facts.
apply hf.induction_dense hp _ _ _ _ hε
rotate_left
-- stability under addition
· rintro f g ⟨f_cont, f_mem, hf⟩ ⟨g_cont, g_mem, hg⟩
exact ⟨f_cont.add g_cont, f_mem.add g_mem, hf.add hg⟩
-- ae strong measurability
· rintro f ⟨_f_cont, f_mem, _hf⟩
exact f_mem.aestronglyMeasurable
-- We are left with approximating characteristic functions.
-- This follows from `exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed`.
intro c t ht htμ ε hε
rcases exists_Lp_half E μ p hε with ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩
obtain ⟨η, ηpos, hη⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _x => c) p μ ≤ δ :=
exists_snorm_indicator_le hp c δpos.ne'
have hη_pos' : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < η := ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ηpos
obtain ⟨s, st, s_compact, μs⟩ : ∃ s, s ⊆ t ∧ IsCompact s ∧ μ (t \ s) < η :=
ht.exists_isCompact_diff_lt htμ.ne hη_pos'.ne'
have hsμ : μ s < ∞ := (measure_mono st).trans_lt htμ
have I1 : snorm ((s.indicator fun _y => c) - t.indicator fun _y => c) p μ ≤ δ := by
rw [← snorm_neg, neg_sub, ← indicator_diff st]
exact hη _ μs.le
obtain ⟨k, k_compact, sk⟩ : ∃ k : Set α, IsCompact k ∧ s ⊆ interior k :=
exists_compact_superset s_compact
rcases exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed hp s_compact.isClosed isOpen_interior sk hsμ.ne c
δpos.ne' with
⟨f, f_cont, I2, _f_bound, f_support, f_mem⟩
have I3 : snorm (f - t.indicator fun _y => c) p μ ≤ ε := by
convert
(hδ _ _
(f_mem.aestronglyMeasurable.sub
(aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator s_compact.measurableSet))
((aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator s_compact.measurableSet).sub
(aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator ht))
I2 I1).le using 2
simp only [sub_add_sub_cancel]
refine ⟨f, I3, f_cont, f_mem, HasCompactSupport.intro k_compact fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← Function.nmem_support]
contrapose! hx
exact interior_subset (f_support hx)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Independent
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Affine bases and barycentric coordinates
Suppose `P` is an affine space modelled on the module `V` over the ring `k`, and `p : ι → P` is an
affine-independent family of points spanning `P`. Given this data, each point `q : P` may be written
uniquely as an affine combination: `q = w₀ p₀ + w₁ p₁ + ⋯` for some (finitely-supported) weights
`wᵢ`. For each `i : ι`, we thus have an affine map `P →ᵃ[k] k`, namely `q ↦ wᵢ`. This family of
maps is known as the family of barycentric coordinates. It is defined in this file.
## The construction
Fixing `i : ι`, and allowing `j : ι` to range over the values `j ≠ i`, we obtain a basis `bᵢ` of `V`
defined by `bᵢ j = p j -ᵥ p i`. Let `fᵢ j : V →ₗ[k] k` be the corresponding dual basis and let
`fᵢ = ∑ j, fᵢ j : V →ₗ[k] k` be the corresponding "sum of all coordinates" form. Then the `i`th
barycentric coordinate of `q : P` is `1 - fᵢ (q -ᵥ p i)`.
## Main definitions
* `AffineBasis`: a structure representing an affine basis of an affine space.
* `AffineBasis.coord`: the map `P →ᵃ[k] k` corresponding to `i : ι`.
* `AffineBasis.coord_apply_eq`: the behaviour of `AffineBasis.coord i` on `p i`.
* `AffineBasis.coord_apply_ne`: the behaviour of `AffineBasis.coord i` on `p j` when `j ≠ i`.
* `AffineBasis.coord_apply`: the behaviour of `AffineBasis.coord i` on `p j` for general `j`.
* `AffineBasis.coord_apply_combination`: the characterisation of `AffineBasis.coord i` in terms
of affine combinations, i.e., `AffineBasis.coord i (w₀ p₀ + w₁ p₁ + ⋯) = wᵢ`.
## TODO
* Construct the affine equivalence between `P` and `{ f : ι →₀ k | f.sum = 1 }`.
-/
open Affine
open Set
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
/-- An affine basis is a family of affine-independent points whose span is the top subspace. -/
structure AffineBasis (ι : Type u₁) (k : Type u₂) {V : Type u₃} (P : Type u₄) [AddCommGroup V]
[AffineSpace V P] [Ring k] [Module k V] where
protected toFun : ι → P
protected ind' : AffineIndependent k toFun
protected tot' : affineSpan k (range toFun) = ⊤
#align affine_basis AffineBasis
variable {ι ι' k V P : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [AffineSpace V P]
namespace AffineBasis
section Ring
variable [Ring k] [Module k V] (b : AffineBasis ι k P) {s : Finset ι} {i j : ι} (e : ι ≃ ι')
/-- The unique point in a single-point space is the simplest example of an affine basis. -/
instance : Inhabited (AffineBasis PUnit k PUnit) :=
⟨⟨id, affineIndependent_of_subsingleton k id, by simp⟩⟩
instance instFunLike : FunLike (AffineBasis ι k P) ι P where
coe := AffineBasis.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
#align affine_basis.fun_like AffineBasis.instFunLike
@[ext]
theorem ext {b₁ b₂ : AffineBasis ι k P} (h : (b₁ : ι → P) = b₂) : b₁ = b₂ :=
DFunLike.coe_injective h
#align affine_basis.ext AffineBasis.ext
theorem ind : AffineIndependent k b :=
b.ind'
#align affine_basis.ind AffineBasis.ind
theorem tot : affineSpan k (range b) = ⊤ :=
b.tot'
#align affine_basis.tot AffineBasis.tot
protected theorem nonempty : Nonempty ι :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun hι => by
simpa only [@range_eq_empty _ _ hι, AffineSubspace.span_empty, bot_ne_top] using b.tot
#align affine_basis.nonempty AffineBasis.nonempty
/-- Composition of an affine basis and an equivalence of index types. -/
def reindex (e : ι ≃ ι') : AffineBasis ι' k P :=
⟨b ∘ e.symm, b.ind.comp_embedding e.symm.toEmbedding, by
rw [e.symm.surjective.range_comp]
exact b.3⟩
#align affine_basis.reindex AffineBasis.reindex
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_reindex : ⇑(b.reindex e) = b ∘ e.symm :=
rfl
#align affine_basis.coe_reindex AffineBasis.coe_reindex
@[simp]
theorem reindex_apply (i' : ι') : b.reindex e i' = b (e.symm i') :=
rfl
#align affine_basis.reindex_apply AffineBasis.reindex_apply
@[simp]
theorem reindex_refl : b.reindex (Equiv.refl _) = b :=
ext rfl
#align affine_basis.reindex_refl AffineBasis.reindex_refl
/-- Given an affine basis for an affine space `P`, if we single out one member of the family, we
obtain a linear basis for the model space `V`.
The linear basis corresponding to the singled-out member `i : ι` is indexed by `{j : ι // j ≠ i}`
and its `j`th element is `b j -ᵥ b i`. (See `basisOf_apply`.) -/
noncomputable def basisOf (i : ι) : Basis { j : ι // j ≠ i } k V :=
Basis.mk ((affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k b i).mp b.ind)
(by
suffices
Submodule.span k (range fun j : { x // x ≠ i } => b ↑j -ᵥ b i) = vectorSpan k (range b) by
rw [this, ← direction_affineSpan, b.tot, AffineSubspace.direction_top]
conv_rhs => rw [← image_univ]
rw [vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne k b (mem_univ i)]
congr
ext v
simp)
#align affine_basis.basis_of AffineBasis.basisOf
@[simp]
theorem basisOf_apply (i : ι) (j : { j : ι // j ≠ i }) : b.basisOf i j = b ↑j -ᵥ b i := by
simp [basisOf]
#align affine_basis.basis_of_apply AffineBasis.basisOf_apply
@[simp]
theorem basisOf_reindex (i : ι') :
(b.reindex e).basisOf i =
(b.basisOf <| e.symm i).reindex (e.subtypeEquiv fun _ => e.eq_symm_apply.not) := by
ext j
simp
#align affine_basis.basis_of_reindex AffineBasis.basisOf_reindex
/-- The `i`th barycentric coordinate of a point. -/
noncomputable def coord (i : ι) : P →ᵃ[k] k where
toFun q := 1 - (b.basisOf i).sumCoords (q -ᵥ b i)
linear := -(b.basisOf i).sumCoords
map_vadd' q v := by
dsimp only
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, LinearMap.map_add, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.neg_apply,
sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap, add_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align affine_basis.coord AffineBasis.coord
@[simp]
theorem linear_eq_sumCoords (i : ι) : (b.coord i).linear = -(b.basisOf i).sumCoords :=
rfl
#align affine_basis.linear_eq_sum_coords AffineBasis.linear_eq_sumCoords
@[simp]
theorem coord_reindex (i : ι') : (b.reindex e).coord i = b.coord (e.symm i) := by
ext
classical simp [AffineBasis.coord]
#align affine_basis.coord_reindex AffineBasis.coord_reindex
@[simp]
theorem coord_apply_eq (i : ι) : b.coord i (b i) = 1 := by
simp only [coord, Basis.coe_sumCoords, LinearEquiv.map_zero, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, sub_zero,
AffineMap.coe_mk, Finsupp.sum_zero_index, vsub_self]
#align affine_basis.coord_apply_eq AffineBasis.coord_apply_eq
@[simp]
theorem coord_apply_ne (h : i ≠ j) : b.coord i (b j) = 0 := by
-- Porting note:
-- in mathlib3 we didn't need to given the `fun j => j ≠ i` argument to `Subtype.coe_mk`,
-- but I don't think we can complain: this proof was over-golfed.
rw [coord, AffineMap.coe_mk, ← @Subtype.coe_mk _ (fun j => j ≠ i) j h.symm, ← b.basisOf_apply,
Basis.sumCoords_self_apply, sub_self]
#align affine_basis.coord_apply_ne AffineBasis.coord_apply_ne
theorem coord_apply [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) : b.coord i (b j) = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h <;> simp [h]
#align affine_basis.coord_apply AffineBasis.coord_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Basis.lean | 187 | 191 | theorem coord_apply_combination_of_mem (hi : i ∈ s) {w : ι → k} (hw : s.sum w = 1) :
b.coord i (s.affineCombination k b w) = w i := by |
classical simp only [coord_apply, hi, Finset.affineCombination_eq_linear_combination, if_true,
mul_boole, hw, Function.comp_apply, smul_eq_mul, s.sum_ite_eq,
s.map_affineCombination b w hw]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import combinatorics.composition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
/-!
# Compositions
A composition of a natural number `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum
of positive integers. Combinatorially, it corresponds to a decomposition of `{0, ..., n-1}` into
non-empty blocks of consecutive integers, where the `iⱼ` are the lengths of the blocks.
This notion is closely related to that of a partition of `n`, but in a composition of `n` the
order of the `iⱼ`s matters.
We implement two different structures covering these two viewpoints on compositions. The first
one, made of a list of positive integers summing to `n`, is the main one and is called
`Composition n`. The second one is useful for combinatorial arguments (for instance to show that
the number of compositions of `n` is `2^(n-1)`). It is given by a subset of `{0, ..., n}`
containing `0` and `n`, where the elements of the subset (other than `n`) correspond to the leftmost
points of each block. The main API is built on `Composition n`, and we provide an equivalence
between the two types.
## Main functions
* `c : Composition n` is a structure, made of a list of integers which are all positive and
add up to `n`.
* `composition_card` states that the cardinality of `Composition n` is exactly
`2^(n-1)`, which is proved by constructing an equiv with `CompositionAsSet n` (see below), which
is itself in bijection with the subsets of `Fin (n-1)` (this holds even for `n = 0`, where `-` is
nat subtraction).
Let `c : Composition n` be a composition of `n`. Then
* `c.blocks` is the list of blocks in `c`.
* `c.length` is the number of blocks in the composition.
* `c.blocks_fun : Fin c.length → ℕ` is the realization of `c.blocks` as a function on
`Fin c.length`. This is the main object when using compositions to understand the composition of
analytic functions.
* `c.sizeUpTo : ℕ → ℕ` is the sum of the size of the blocks up to `i`.;
* `c.embedding i : Fin (c.blocks_fun i) → Fin n` is the increasing embedding of the `i`-th block in
`Fin n`;
* `c.index j`, for `j : Fin n`, is the index of the block containing `j`.
* `Composition.ones n` is the composition of `n` made of ones, i.e., `[1, ..., 1]`.
* `Composition.single n (hn : 0 < n)` is the composition of `n` made of a single block of size `n`.
Compositions can also be used to split lists. Let `l` be a list of length `n` and `c` a composition
of `n`.
* `l.splitWrtComposition c` is a list of lists, made of the slices of `l` corresponding to the
blocks of `c`.
* `join_splitWrtComposition` states that splitting a list and then joining it gives back the
original list.
* `joinSplitWrtComposition_join` states that joining a list of lists, and then splitting it back
according to the right composition, gives back the original list of lists.
We turn to the second viewpoint on compositions, that we realize as a finset of `Fin (n+1)`.
`c : CompositionAsSet n` is a structure made of a finset of `Fin (n+1)` called `c.boundaries`
and proofs that it contains `0` and `n`. (Taking a finset of `Fin n` containing `0` would not
make sense in the edge case `n = 0`, while the previous description works in all cases).
The elements of this set (other than `n`) correspond to leftmost points of blocks.
Thus, there is an equiv between `Composition n` and `CompositionAsSet n`. We
only construct basic API on `CompositionAsSet` (notably `c.length` and `c.blocks`) to be able
to construct this equiv, called `compositionEquiv n`. Since there is a straightforward equiv
between `CompositionAsSet n` and finsets of `{1, ..., n-1}` (obtained by removing `0` and `n`
from a `CompositionAsSet` and called `compositionAsSetEquiv n`), we deduce that
`CompositionAsSet n` and `Composition n` are both fintypes of cardinality `2^(n - 1)`
(see `compositionAsSet_card` and `composition_card`).
## Implementation details
The main motivation for this structure and its API is in the construction of the composition of
formal multilinear series, and the proof that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The representation of a composition as a list is very handy as lists are very flexible and already
have a well-developed API.
## Tags
Composition, partition
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_(combinatorics)>
-/
open List
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- A composition of `n` is a list of positive integers summing to `n`. -/
@[ext]
structure Composition (n : ℕ) where
/-- List of positive integers summing to `n`-/
blocks : List ℕ
/-- Proof of positivity for `blocks`-/
blocks_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ blocks → 0 < i
/-- Proof that `blocks` sums to `n`-/
blocks_sum : blocks.sum = n
#align composition Composition
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n`, by seeing it as non-empty blocks of
consecutive integers in `{0, ..., n-1}`. We register every block by its left end-point, yielding
a finset containing `0`. As this does not make sense for `n = 0`, we add `n` to this finset, and
get a finset of `{0, ..., n}` containing `0` and `n`. This is the data in the structure
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
@[ext]
structure CompositionAsSet (n : ℕ) where
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n` as consecutive integers `{0, ..., n-1}`-/
boundaries : Finset (Fin n.succ)
/-- Proof that `0` is a member of `boundaries`-/
zero_mem : (0 : Fin n.succ) ∈ boundaries
/-- Last element of the composition-/
getLast_mem : Fin.last n ∈ boundaries
#align composition_as_set CompositionAsSet
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (CompositionAsSet n) :=
⟨⟨Finset.univ, Finset.mem_univ _, Finset.mem_univ _⟩⟩
/-!
### Compositions
A composition of an integer `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum of
positive integers.
-/
namespace Composition
variable (c : Composition n)
instance (n : ℕ) : ToString (Composition n) :=
⟨fun c => toString c.blocks⟩
/-- The length of a composition, i.e., the number of blocks in the composition. -/
abbrev length : ℕ :=
c.blocks.length
#align composition.length Composition.length
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
rfl
#align composition.blocks_length Composition.blocks_length
/-- The blocks of a composition, seen as a function on `Fin c.length`. When composing analytic
functions using compositions, this is the main player. -/
def blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ := c.blocks.get
#align composition.blocks_fun Composition.blocksFun
theorem ofFn_blocksFun : ofFn c.blocksFun = c.blocks :=
ofFn_get _
#align composition.of_fn_blocks_fun Composition.ofFn_blocksFun
theorem sum_blocksFun : ∑ i, c.blocksFun i = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← ofFn_blocksFun, sum_ofFn]
#align composition.sum_blocks_fun Composition.sum_blocksFun
theorem blocksFun_mem_blocks (i : Fin c.length) : c.blocksFun i ∈ c.blocks :=
get_mem _ _ _
#align composition.blocks_fun_mem_blocks Composition.blocksFun_mem_blocks
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : 1 ≤ i :=
c.blocks_pos h
#align composition.one_le_blocks Composition.one_le_blocks
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks' {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ :=
c.one_le_blocks (get_mem (blocks c) i h)
#align composition.one_le_blocks' Composition.one_le_blocks'
@[simp]
theorem blocks_pos' (i : ℕ) (h : i < c.length) : 0 < c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ :=
c.one_le_blocks' h
#align composition.blocks_pos' Composition.blocks_pos'
theorem one_le_blocksFun (i : Fin c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocksFun i :=
c.one_le_blocks (c.blocksFun_mem_blocks i)
#align composition.one_le_blocks_fun Composition.one_le_blocksFun
theorem length_le : c.length ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact length_le_sum_of_one_le _ fun i hi => c.one_le_blocks hi
#align composition.length_le Composition.length_le
theorem length_pos_of_pos (h : 0 < n) : 0 < c.length := by
apply length_pos_of_sum_pos
convert h
exact c.blocks_sum
#align composition.length_pos_of_pos Composition.length_pos_of_pos
/-- The sum of the sizes of the blocks in a composition up to `i`. -/
def sizeUpTo (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(c.blocks.take i).sum
#align composition.size_up_to Composition.sizeUpTo
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_zero : c.sizeUpTo 0 = 0 := by simp [sizeUpTo]
#align composition.size_up_to_zero Composition.sizeUpTo_zero
theorem sizeUpTo_ofLength_le (i : ℕ) (h : c.length ≤ i) : c.sizeUpTo i = n := by
dsimp [sizeUpTo]
convert c.blocks_sum
exact take_all_of_le h
#align composition.size_up_to_of_length_le Composition.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_length : c.sizeUpTo c.length = n :=
c.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le c.length le_rfl
#align composition.size_up_to_length Composition.sizeUpTo_length
theorem sizeUpTo_le (i : ℕ) : c.sizeUpTo i ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← sum_take_add_sum_drop _ i]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align composition.size_up_to_le Composition.sizeUpTo_le
theorem sizeUpTo_succ {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ := by
simp only [sizeUpTo]
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ h]
#align composition.size_up_to_succ Composition.sizeUpTo_succ
theorem sizeUpTo_succ' (i : Fin c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo ((i : ℕ) + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i :=
c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2
#align composition.size_up_to_succ' Composition.sizeUpTo_succ'
theorem sizeUpTo_strict_mono {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : c.sizeUpTo i < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := by
rw [c.sizeUpTo_succ h]
simp
#align composition.size_up_to_strict_mono Composition.sizeUpTo_strict_mono
theorem monotone_sizeUpTo : Monotone c.sizeUpTo :=
monotone_sum_take _
#align composition.monotone_size_up_to Composition.monotone_sizeUpTo
/-- The `i`-th boundary of a composition, i.e., the leftmost point of the `i`-th block. We include
a virtual point at the right of the last block, to make for a nice equiv with
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
def boundary : Fin (c.length + 1) ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono fun i => ⟨c.sizeUpTo i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_le i)⟩) <|
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => c.sizeUpTo_strict_mono hi
#align composition.boundary Composition.boundary
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : c.boundary 0 = 0 := by simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.boundary_zero Composition.boundary_zero
@[simp]
theorem boundary_last : c.boundary (Fin.last c.length) = Fin.last n := by
simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.boundary_last Composition.boundary_last
/-- The boundaries of a composition, i.e., the leftmost point of all the blocks. We include
a virtual point at the right of the last block, to make for a nice equiv with
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
def boundaries : Finset (Fin (n + 1)) :=
Finset.univ.map c.boundary.toEmbedding
#align composition.boundaries Composition.boundaries
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 := by simp [boundaries]
#align composition.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length Composition.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length
/-- To `c : Composition n`, one can associate a `CompositionAsSet n` by registering the leftmost
point of each block, and adding a virtual point at the right of the last block. -/
def toCompositionAsSet : CompositionAsSet n where
boundaries := c.boundaries
zero_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨0, And.intro True.intro rfl⟩
getLast_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨Fin.last c.length, And.intro True.intro c.boundary_last⟩
#align composition.to_composition_as_set Composition.toCompositionAsSet
/-- The canonical increasing bijection between `Fin (c.length + 1)` and `c.boundaries` is
exactly `c.boundary`. -/
theorem orderEmbOfFin_boundaries :
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length = c.boundary := by
refine (Finset.orderEmbOfFin_unique' _ ?_).symm
exact fun i => (Finset.mem_map' _).2 (Finset.mem_univ _)
#align composition.order_emb_of_fin_boundaries Composition.orderEmbOfFin_boundaries
/-- Embedding the `i`-th block of a composition (identified with `Fin (c.blocks_fun i)`) into
`Fin n` at the relevant position. -/
def embedding (i : Fin c.length) : Fin (c.blocksFun i) ↪o Fin n :=
(Fin.natAddOrderEmb <| c.sizeUpTo i).trans <| Fin.castLEOrderEmb <|
calc
c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i = c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := (c.sizeUpTo_succ _).symm
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo c.length := monotone_sum_take _ i.2
_ = n := c.sizeUpTo_length
#align composition.embedding Composition.embedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.embedding i j : ℕ) = c.sizeUpTo i + j :=
rfl
#align composition.coe_embedding Composition.coe_embedding
/-- `index_exists` asserts there is some `i` with `j < c.size_up_to (i+1)`.
In the next definition `index` we use `Nat.find` to produce the minimal such index.
-/
theorem index_exists {j : ℕ} (h : j < n) : ∃ i : ℕ, j < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) ∧ i < c.length := by
have n_pos : 0 < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le j) h
have : 0 < c.blocks.sum := by rwa [← c.blocks_sum] at n_pos
have length_pos : 0 < c.blocks.length := length_pos_of_sum_pos (blocks c) this
refine ⟨c.length - 1, ?_, Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt length_pos)⟩
have : c.length - 1 + 1 = c.length := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos length_pos
simp [this, h]
#align composition.index_exists Composition.index_exists
/-- `c.index j` is the index of the block in the composition `c` containing `j`. -/
def index (j : Fin n) : Fin c.length :=
⟨Nat.find (c.index_exists j.2), (Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).2⟩
#align composition.index Composition.index
theorem lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ (j : Fin n) : (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (c.index j).succ :=
(Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).1
#align composition.lt_size_up_to_index_succ Composition.lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ
theorem sizeUpTo_index_le (j : Fin n) : c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) ≤ j := by
by_contra H
set i := c.index j
push_neg at H
have i_pos : (0 : ℕ) < i := by
by_contra! i_pos
revert H
simp [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 i_pos, c.sizeUpTo_zero]
let i₁ := (i : ℕ).pred
have i₁_lt_i : i₁ < i := Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt i_pos)
have i₁_succ : i₁ + 1 = i := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos i_pos
have := Nat.find_min (c.index_exists j.2) i₁_lt_i
simp [lt_trans i₁_lt_i (c.index j).2, i₁_succ] at this
exact Nat.lt_le_asymm H this
#align composition.size_up_to_index_le Composition.sizeUpTo_index_le
/-- Mapping an element `j` of `Fin n` to the element in the block containing it, identified with
`Fin (c.blocks_fun (c.index j))` through the canonical increasing bijection. -/
def invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) :=
⟨j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j), by
rw [tsub_lt_iff_right, add_comm, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ _ _
· exact sizeUpTo_index_le _ _⟩
#align composition.inv_embedding Composition.invEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : (c.invEmbedding j : ℕ) = j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) :=
rfl
#align composition.coe_inv_embedding Composition.coe_invEmbedding
theorem embedding_comp_inv (j : Fin n) : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) = j := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_index_le j)
#align composition.embedding_comp_inv Composition.embedding_comp_inv
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ c.sizeUpTo i ≤ j ∧ (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i : ℕ).succ := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases Set.mem_range.2 h with ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [Fin.ext_iff] at hk
dsimp at hk
rw [← hk]
simp [sizeUpTo_succ', k.is_lt]
· intro h
apply Set.mem_range.2
refine ⟨⟨j - c.sizeUpTo i, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_iff_left, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact h.2
· exact h.1
· rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact add_tsub_cancel_of_le h.1
#align composition.mem_range_embedding_iff Composition.mem_range_embedding_iff
/-- The embeddings of different blocks of a composition are disjoint. -/
theorem disjoint_range {i₁ i₂ : Fin c.length} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
Disjoint (Set.range (c.embedding i₁)) (Set.range (c.embedding i₂)) := by
classical
wlog h' : i₁ < i₂
· exact (this c h.symm (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h')).symm
by_contra d
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ :
∃ x : Fin n, x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₁) ∧ x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₂) :=
Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 d
have A : (i₁ : ℕ).succ ≤ i₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h'
apply lt_irrefl (x : ℕ)
calc
(x : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i₁ : ℕ).succ := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₁).2
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo (i₂ : ℕ) := monotone_sum_take _ A
_ ≤ x := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₂).1
#align composition.disjoint_range Composition.disjoint_range
theorem mem_range_embedding (j : Fin n) : j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) := by
have : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) :=
Set.mem_range_self _
rwa [c.embedding_comp_inv j] at this
#align composition.mem_range_embedding Composition.mem_range_embedding
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff' {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ i = c.index j := by
constructor
· rw [← not_imp_not]
intro h
exact Set.disjoint_right.1 (c.disjoint_range h) (c.mem_range_embedding j)
· intro h
rw [h]
exact c.mem_range_embedding j
#align composition.mem_range_embedding_iff' Composition.mem_range_embedding_iff'
theorem index_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
c.index (c.embedding i j) = i := by
symm
rw [← mem_range_embedding_iff']
apply Set.mem_range_self
#align composition.index_embedding Composition.index_embedding
theorem invEmbedding_comp (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.invEmbedding (c.embedding i j) : ℕ) = j := by
simp_rw [coe_invEmbedding, index_embedding, coe_embedding, add_tsub_cancel_left]
#align composition.inv_embedding_comp Composition.invEmbedding_comp
/-- Equivalence between the disjoint union of the blocks (each of them seen as
`Fin (c.blocks_fun i)`) with `Fin n`. -/
def blocksFinEquiv : (Σi : Fin c.length, Fin (c.blocksFun i)) ≃ Fin n where
toFun x := c.embedding x.1 x.2
invFun j := ⟨c.index j, c.invEmbedding j⟩
left_inv x := by
rcases x with ⟨i, y⟩
dsimp
congr; · exact c.index_embedding _ _
rw [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
· exact c.invEmbedding_comp _ _
· rw [c.index_embedding]
right_inv j := c.embedding_comp_inv j
#align composition.blocks_fin_equiv Composition.blocksFinEquiv
theorem blocksFun_congr {n₁ n₂ : ℕ} (c₁ : Composition n₁) (c₂ : Composition n₂) (i₁ : Fin c₁.length)
(i₂ : Fin c₂.length) (hn : n₁ = n₂) (hc : c₁.blocks = c₂.blocks) (hi : (i₁ : ℕ) = i₂) :
c₁.blocksFun i₁ = c₂.blocksFun i₂ := by
cases hn
rw [← Composition.ext_iff] at hc
cases hc
congr
rwa [Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.blocks_fun_congr Composition.blocksFun_congr
/-- Two compositions (possibly of different integers) coincide if and only if they have the
same sequence of blocks. -/
theorem sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq {c : Σn, Composition n} {c' : Σn, Composition n} :
c = c' ↔ c.2.blocks = c'.2.blocks := by
refine ⟨fun H => by rw [H], fun H => ?_⟩
rcases c with ⟨n, c⟩
rcases c' with ⟨n', c'⟩
have : n = n' := by rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← c'.blocks_sum, H]
induction this
congr
ext1
exact H
#align composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq Composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq
/-! ### The composition `Composition.ones` -/
/-- The composition made of blocks all of size `1`. -/
def ones (n : ℕ) : Composition n :=
⟨replicate n (1 : ℕ), fun {i} hi => by simp [List.eq_of_mem_replicate hi], by simp⟩
#align composition.ones Composition.ones
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (Composition n) :=
⟨Composition.ones n⟩
@[simp]
theorem ones_length (n : ℕ) : (ones n).length = n :=
List.length_replicate n 1
#align composition.ones_length Composition.ones_length
@[simp]
theorem ones_blocks (n : ℕ) : (ones n).blocks = replicate n (1 : ℕ) :=
rfl
#align composition.ones_blocks Composition.ones_blocks
@[simp]
theorem ones_blocksFun (n : ℕ) (i : Fin (ones n).length) : (ones n).blocksFun i = 1 := by
simp only [blocksFun, ones, blocks, i.2, List.get_replicate]
#align composition.ones_blocks_fun Composition.ones_blocksFun
@[simp]
theorem ones_sizeUpTo (n : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : (ones n).sizeUpTo i = min i n := by
simp [sizeUpTo, ones_blocks, take_replicate]
#align composition.ones_size_up_to Composition.ones_sizeUpTo
@[simp]
theorem ones_embedding (i : Fin (ones n).length) (h : 0 < (ones n).blocksFun i) :
(ones n).embedding i ⟨0, h⟩ = ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (ones n).length_le⟩ := by
ext
simpa using i.2.le
#align composition.ones_embedding Composition.ones_embedding
theorem eq_ones_iff {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ ∀ i ∈ c.blocks, i = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact fun i => eq_of_mem_replicate
· intro H
ext1
have A : c.blocks = replicate c.blocks.length 1 := eq_replicate_of_mem H
have : c.blocks.length = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, A]
simp
rw [A, this, ones_blocks]
#align composition.eq_ones_iff Composition.eq_ones_iff
theorem ne_ones_iff {c : Composition n} : c ≠ ones n ↔ ∃ i ∈ c.blocks, 1 < i := by
refine (not_congr eq_ones_iff).trans ?_
have : ∀ j ∈ c.blocks, j = 1 ↔ j ≤ 1 := fun j hj => by simp [le_antisymm_iff, c.one_le_blocks hj]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [this]
#align composition.ne_ones_iff Composition.ne_ones_iff
theorem eq_ones_iff_length {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ c.length = n := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ones_length n
· contrapose
intro H length_n
apply lt_irrefl n
calc
n = ∑ i : Fin c.length, 1 := by simp [length_n]
_ < ∑ i : Fin c.length, c.blocksFun i := by
{
obtain ⟨i, hi, i_blocks⟩ : ∃ i ∈ c.blocks, 1 < i := ne_ones_iff.1 H
rw [← ofFn_blocksFun, mem_ofFn c.blocksFun, Set.mem_range] at hi
obtain ⟨j : Fin c.length, hj : c.blocksFun j = i⟩ := hi
rw [← hj] at i_blocks
exact Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => one_le_blocksFun c i) ⟨j, Finset.mem_univ _, i_blocks⟩
}
_ = n := c.sum_blocksFun
#align composition.eq_ones_iff_length Composition.eq_ones_iff_length
theorem eq_ones_iff_le_length {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ n ≤ c.length := by
simp [eq_ones_iff_length, le_antisymm_iff, c.length_le]
#align composition.eq_ones_iff_le_length Composition.eq_ones_iff_le_length
/-! ### The composition `Composition.single` -/
/-- The composition made of a single block of size `n`. -/
def single (n : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) : Composition n :=
⟨[n], by simp [h], by simp⟩
#align composition.single Composition.single
@[simp]
theorem single_length {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : (single n h).length = 1 :=
rfl
#align composition.single_length Composition.single_length
@[simp]
theorem single_blocks {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : (single n h).blocks = [n] :=
rfl
#align composition.single_blocks Composition.single_blocks
@[simp]
theorem single_blocksFun {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (i : Fin (single n h).length) :
(single n h).blocksFun i = n := by simp [blocksFun, single, blocks, i.2]
#align composition.single_blocks_fun Composition.single_blocksFun
@[simp]
theorem single_embedding {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (i : Fin n) :
((single n h).embedding (0 : Fin 1)) i = i := by
ext
simp
#align composition.single_embedding Composition.single_embedding
theorem eq_single_iff_length {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) {c : Composition n} :
c = single n h ↔ c.length = 1 := by
constructor
· intro H
rw [H]
exact single_length h
· intro H
ext1
have A : c.blocks.length = 1 := H ▸ c.blocks_length
have B : c.blocks.sum = n := c.blocks_sum
rw [eq_cons_of_length_one A] at B ⊢
simpa [single_blocks] using B
#align composition.eq_single_iff_length Composition.eq_single_iff_length
theorem ne_single_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {c : Composition n} :
c ≠ single n hn ↔ ∀ i, c.blocksFun i < n := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨⟨0, by simp⟩, by simp⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [eq_single_iff_length]
have : ∀ j : Fin c.length, j = i := by
intro j
by_contra ji
apply lt_irrefl (∑ k, c.blocksFun k)
calc
∑ k, c.blocksFun k ≤ c.blocksFun i := by simp only [c.sum_blocksFun, hi]
_ < ∑ k, c.blocksFun k :=
Finset.single_lt_sum ji (Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) (c.one_le_blocksFun j)
fun _ _ _ => zero_le _
simpa using Fintype.card_eq_one_of_forall_eq this
#align composition.ne_single_iff Composition.ne_single_iff
end Composition
/-!
### Splitting a list
Given a list of length `n` and a composition `c` of `n`, one can split `l` into `c.length` sublists
of respective lengths `c.blocks_fun 0`, ..., `c.blocks_fun (c.length-1)`. This is inverse to the
join operation.
-/
namespace List
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Auxiliary for `List.splitWrtComposition`. -/
def splitWrtCompositionAux : List α → List ℕ → List (List α)
| _, [] => []
| l, n::ns =>
let (l₁, l₂) := l.splitAt n
l₁::splitWrtCompositionAux l₂ ns
#align list.split_wrt_composition_aux List.splitWrtCompositionAux
/-- Given a list of length `n` and a composition `[i₁, ..., iₖ]` of `n`, split `l` into a list of
`k` lists corresponding to the blocks of the composition, of respective lengths `i₁`, ..., `iₖ`.
This makes sense mostly when `n = l.length`, but this is not necessary for the definition. -/
def splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition n) : List (List α) :=
splitWrtCompositionAux l c.blocks
#align list.split_wrt_composition List.splitWrtComposition
-- Porting note: can't refer to subeqn in Lean 4 this way, and seems to definitionally simp
--attribute [local simp] splitWrtCompositionAux.equations._eqn_1
@[local simp]
theorem splitWrtCompositionAux_cons (l : List α) (n ns) :
l.splitWrtCompositionAux (n::ns) = take n l::(drop n l).splitWrtCompositionAux ns := by
simp [splitWrtCompositionAux]
#align list.split_wrt_composition_aux_cons List.splitWrtCompositionAux_cons
theorem length_splitWrtCompositionAux (l : List α) (ns) :
length (l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns) = ns.length := by
induction ns generalizing l
· simp [splitWrtCompositionAux, *]
· simp [*]
#align list.length_split_wrt_composition_aux List.length_splitWrtCompositionAux
/-- When one splits a list along a composition `c`, the number of sublists thus created is
`c.length`. -/
@[simp]
theorem length_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition n) :
length (l.splitWrtComposition c) = c.length :=
length_splitWrtCompositionAux _ _
#align list.length_split_wrt_composition List.length_splitWrtComposition
theorem map_length_splitWrtCompositionAux {ns : List ℕ} :
∀ {l : List α}, ns.sum ≤ l.length → map length (l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns) = ns := by
induction' ns with n ns IH <;> intro l h <;> simp at h
· simp [splitWrtCompositionAux]
have := le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) h
simp only [splitWrtCompositionAux_cons, this]; dsimp
rw [length_take, IH] <;> simp [length_drop]
· assumption
· exact le_tsub_of_add_le_left h
#align list.map_length_split_wrt_composition_aux List.map_length_splitWrtCompositionAux
/-- When one splits a list along a composition `c`, the lengths of the sublists thus created are
given by the block sizes in `c`. -/
theorem map_length_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition l.length) :
map length (l.splitWrtComposition c) = c.blocks :=
map_length_splitWrtCompositionAux (le_of_eq c.blocks_sum)
#align list.map_length_split_wrt_composition List.map_length_splitWrtComposition
theorem length_pos_of_mem_splitWrtComposition {l l' : List α} {c : Composition l.length}
(h : l' ∈ l.splitWrtComposition c) : 0 < length l' := by
have : l'.length ∈ (l.splitWrtComposition c).map List.length :=
List.mem_map_of_mem List.length h
rw [map_length_splitWrtComposition] at this
exact c.blocks_pos this
#align list.length_pos_of_mem_split_wrt_composition List.length_pos_of_mem_splitWrtComposition
theorem sum_take_map_length_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition l.length) (i : ℕ) :
(((l.splitWrtComposition c).map length).take i).sum = c.sizeUpTo i := by
congr
exact map_length_splitWrtComposition l c
#align list.sum_take_map_length_split_wrt_composition List.sum_take_map_length_splitWrtComposition
theorem get_splitWrtCompositionAux (l : List α) (ns : List ℕ) {i : ℕ} (hi) :
(l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns).get ⟨i, hi⟩ =
(l.take (ns.take (i + 1)).sum).drop (ns.take i).sum := by
induction' ns with n ns IH generalizing l i
· cases hi
cases' i with i
· rw [Nat.add_zero, List.take_zero, sum_nil]
simpa using get_mk_zero hi
· simp only [splitWrtCompositionAux, get_cons_succ, IH, take,
sum_cons, Nat.add_eq, add_zero, splitAt_eq_take_drop, drop_take, drop_drop]
rw [add_comm (sum _) n, Nat.add_sub_add_left]
#align list.nth_le_split_wrt_composition_aux List.get_splitWrtCompositionAux
/-- The `i`-th sublist in the splitting of a list `l` along a composition `c`, is the slice of `l`
between the indices `c.sizeUpTo i` and `c.sizeUpTo (i+1)`, i.e., the indices in the `i`-th
block of the composition. -/
theorem get_splitWrtComposition' (l : List α) (c : Composition n) {i : ℕ}
(hi : i < (l.splitWrtComposition c).length) :
(l.splitWrtComposition c).get ⟨i, hi⟩ = (l.take (c.sizeUpTo (i + 1))).drop (c.sizeUpTo i) :=
get_splitWrtCompositionAux _ _ _
#align list.nth_le_split_wrt_composition List.get_splitWrtComposition'
-- Porting note: restatement of `get_splitWrtComposition`
theorem get_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition n)
(i : Fin (l.splitWrtComposition c).length) :
get (l.splitWrtComposition c) i = (l.take (c.sizeUpTo (i + 1))).drop (c.sizeUpTo i) :=
get_splitWrtComposition' _ _ _
theorem join_splitWrtCompositionAux {ns : List ℕ} :
∀ {l : List α}, ns.sum = l.length → (l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns).join = l := by
induction' ns with n ns IH <;> intro l h <;> simp at h
· exact (length_eq_zero.1 h.symm).symm
simp only [splitWrtCompositionAux_cons]; dsimp
rw [IH]
· simp
· rw [length_drop, ← h, add_tsub_cancel_left]
#align list.join_split_wrt_composition_aux List.join_splitWrtCompositionAux
/-- If one splits a list along a composition, and then joins the sublists, one gets back the
original list. -/
@[simp]
theorem join_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition l.length) :
(l.splitWrtComposition c).join = l :=
join_splitWrtCompositionAux c.blocks_sum
#align list.join_split_wrt_composition List.join_splitWrtComposition
/-- If one joins a list of lists and then splits the join along the right composition, one gets
back the original list of lists. -/
@[simp]
theorem splitWrtComposition_join (L : List (List α)) (c : Composition L.join.length)
(h : map length L = c.blocks) : splitWrtComposition (join L) c = L := by
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff, eq_iff_join_eq, join_splitWrtComposition,
map_length_splitWrtComposition, h]
#align list.split_wrt_composition_join List.splitWrtComposition_join
end List
/-!
### Compositions as sets
Combinatorial viewpoints on compositions, seen as finite subsets of `Fin (n+1)` containing `0` and
`n`, where the points of the set (other than `n`) correspond to the leftmost points of each block.
-/
/-- Bijection between compositions of `n` and subsets of `{0, ..., n-2}`, defined by
considering the restriction of the subset to `{1, ..., n-1}` and shifting to the left by one. -/
def compositionAsSetEquiv (n : ℕ) : CompositionAsSet n ≃ Finset (Fin (n - 1)) where
toFun c :=
{ i : Fin (n - 1) |
(⟨1 + (i : ℕ), by
apply (add_lt_add_left i.is_lt 1).trans_le
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm]
exact add_le_add (Nat.sub_le n 1) (le_refl 1)⟩ :
Fin n.succ) ∈
c.boundaries }.toFinset
invFun s :=
{ boundaries :=
{ i : Fin n.succ |
i = 0 ∨ i = Fin.last n ∨ ∃ (j : Fin (n - 1)) (_hj : j ∈ s), (i : ℕ) = j + 1 }.toFinset
zero_mem := by simp
getLast_mem := by simp }
left_inv := by
intro c
ext i
simp only [add_comm, Set.toFinset_setOf, Finset.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, true_and, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨j, hj1, hj2⟩)
· exact c.zero_mem
· exact c.getLast_mem
· convert hj1
· simp only [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro i_mem i_ne_zero i_ne_last
simp? [Fin.ext_iff] at i_ne_zero i_ne_last says
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_last]
at i_ne_zero i_ne_last
have A : (1 + (i - 1) : ℕ) = (i : ℕ) := by
rw [add_comm]
exact Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr i_ne_zero)
refine ⟨⟨i - 1, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· have : (i : ℕ) < n + 1 := i.2
simp? [Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq, i_ne_last] at this says
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq, i_ne_last, or_false] at this
exact Nat.pred_lt_pred i_ne_zero this
· convert i_mem
simp only [ge_iff_le]
rwa [add_comm]
· simp only [ge_iff_le]
symm
rwa [add_comm]
right_inv := by
intro s
ext i
have : 1 + (i : ℕ) ≠ n := by
apply ne_of_lt
convert add_lt_add_left i.is_lt 1
rw [add_comm]
apply (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos _).symm
exact (zero_le i.val).trans_lt (i.2.trans_le (Nat.sub_le n 1))
simp only [add_comm, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_last, exists_prop, Set.toFinset_setOf,
Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, add_eq_zero_iff, and_false,
add_left_inj, false_or, true_and]
erw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
simp [this, false_or_iff, add_right_inj, add_eq_zero_iff, one_ne_zero, false_and_iff,
Fin.val_mk]
constructor
· intro h
cases' h with n h
· rw [add_comm] at this
contradiction
· cases' h with w h; cases' h with h₁ h₂
rw [← Fin.ext_iff] at h₂
rwa [h₂]
· intro h
apply Or.inr
use i, h
#align composition_as_set_equiv compositionAsSetEquiv
instance compositionAsSetFintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (CompositionAsSet n) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ (compositionAsSetEquiv n).symm
#align composition_as_set_fintype compositionAsSetFintype
theorem compositionAsSet_card (n : ℕ) : Fintype.card (CompositionAsSet n) = 2 ^ (n - 1) := by
have : Fintype.card (Finset (Fin (n - 1))) = 2 ^ (n - 1) := by simp
rw [← this]
exact Fintype.card_congr (compositionAsSetEquiv n)
#align composition_as_set_card compositionAsSet_card
namespace CompositionAsSet
variable (c : CompositionAsSet n)
theorem boundaries_nonempty : c.boundaries.Nonempty :=
⟨0, c.zero_mem⟩
#align composition_as_set.boundaries_nonempty CompositionAsSet.boundaries_nonempty
theorem card_boundaries_pos : 0 < Finset.card c.boundaries :=
Finset.card_pos.mpr c.boundaries_nonempty
#align composition_as_set.card_boundaries_pos CompositionAsSet.card_boundaries_pos
/-- Number of blocks in a `CompositionAsSet`. -/
def length : ℕ :=
Finset.card c.boundaries - 1
#align composition_as_set.length CompositionAsSet.length
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 :=
(tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt c.card_boundaries_pos)).mp rfl
#align composition_as_set.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length CompositionAsSet.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length
theorem length_lt_card_boundaries : c.length < c.boundaries.card := by
rw [c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length]
exact lt_add_one _
#align composition_as_set.length_lt_card_boundaries CompositionAsSet.length_lt_card_boundaries
theorem lt_length (i : Fin c.length) : (i : ℕ) + 1 < c.boundaries.card :=
lt_tsub_iff_right.mp i.2
#align composition_as_set.lt_length CompositionAsSet.lt_length
theorem lt_length' (i : Fin c.length) : (i : ℕ) < c.boundaries.card :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_succ i) (c.lt_length i)
#align composition_as_set.lt_length' CompositionAsSet.lt_length'
/-- Canonical increasing bijection from `Fin c.boundaries.card` to `c.boundaries`. -/
def boundary : Fin c.boundaries.card ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin rfl
#align composition_as_set.boundary CompositionAsSet.boundary
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : (c.boundary ⟨0, c.card_boundaries_pos⟩ : Fin (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [boundary, Finset.orderEmbOfFin_zero rfl c.card_boundaries_pos]
exact le_antisymm (Finset.min'_le _ _ c.zero_mem) (Fin.zero_le _)
#align composition_as_set.boundary_zero CompositionAsSet.boundary_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Composition.lean | 895 | 897 | theorem boundary_length : c.boundary ⟨c.length, c.length_lt_card_boundaries⟩ = Fin.last n := by |
convert Finset.orderEmbOfFin_last rfl c.card_boundaries_pos
exact le_antisymm (Finset.le_max' _ _ c.getLast_mem) (Fin.le_last _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
#align_import algebra.big_operators.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Big operators
In this file we define products and sums indexed by finite sets (specifically, `Finset`).
## Notation
We introduce the following notation.
Let `s` be a `Finset α`, and `f : α → β` a function.
* `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f` (assuming `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f` (assuming `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
* `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
## Implementation Notes
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists AddCommMonoidWithOne
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
variable {ι κ α β γ : Type*}
open Fin Function
namespace Finset
/-- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is the product of `f x`
as `x` ranges over the elements of the finite set `s`.
-/
@[to_additive "`∑ x ∈ s, f x` is the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements
of the finite set `s`."]
protected def prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : β :=
(s.1.map f).prod
#align finset.prod Finset.prod
#align finset.sum Finset.sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset α) (hs : s.Nodup) (f : α → β) :
(⟨s, hs⟩ : Finset α).prod f = (s.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_mk Finset.prod_mk
#align finset.sum_mk Finset.sum_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_val [CommMonoid α] (s : Finset α) : s.1.prod = s.prod id := by
rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_val Finset.prod_val
#align finset.sum_val Finset.sum_val
end Finset
library_note "operator precedence of big operators"/--
There is no established mathematical convention
for the operator precedence of big operators like `∏` and `∑`.
We will have to make a choice.
Online discussions, such as https://math.stackexchange.com/q/185538/30839
seem to suggest that `∏` and `∑` should have the same precedence,
and that this should be somewhere between `*` and `+`.
The latter have precedence levels `70` and `65` respectively,
and we therefore choose the level `67`.
In practice, this means that parentheses should be placed as follows:
```lean
∑ k ∈ K, (a k + b k) = ∑ k ∈ K, a k + ∑ k ∈ K, b k →
∏ k ∈ K, a k * b k = (∏ k ∈ K, a k) * (∏ k ∈ K, b k)
```
(Example taken from page 490 of Knuth's *Concrete Mathematics*.)
-/
namespace BigOperators
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder Lean Meta
-- TODO: contribute this modification back to `extBinder`
/-- A `bigOpBinder` is like an `extBinder` and has the form `x`, `x : ty`, or `x pred`
where `pred` is a `binderPred` like `< 2`.
Unlike `extBinder`, `x` is a term. -/
syntax bigOpBinder := term:max ((" : " term) <|> binderPred)?
/-- A BigOperator binder in parentheses -/
syntax bigOpBinderParenthesized := " (" bigOpBinder ")"
/-- A list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinderCollection := bigOpBinderParenthesized+
/-- A single (unparenthesized) binder, or a list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinders := bigOpBinderCollection <|> (ppSpace bigOpBinder)
/-- Collects additional binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinder`.
Note: this is not extensible at the moment, unlike the usual `bigOpBinder` expansions. -/
def processBigOpBinder (processed : (Array (Term × Term)))
(binder : TSyntax ``bigOpBinder) : MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
set_option hygiene false in
withRef binder do
match binder with
| `(bigOpBinder| $x:term) =>
match x with
| `(($a + $b = $n)) => -- Maybe this is too cute.
return processed |>.push (← `(⟨$a, $b⟩), ← `(Finset.Nat.antidiagonal $n))
| _ => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``(Finset.univ))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x : $t) => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``((Finset.univ : Finset $t)))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ∈ $s) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(finset% $s))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x < $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iio $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≤ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iic $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x > $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ioi $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≥ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ici $n))
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collects the binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinders`. -/
def processBigOpBinders (binders : TSyntax ``bigOpBinders) :
MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
match binders with
| `(bigOpBinders| $b:bigOpBinder) => processBigOpBinder #[] b
| `(bigOpBinders| $[($bs:bigOpBinder)]*) => bs.foldlM processBigOpBinder #[]
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collect the binderIdents into a `⟨...⟩` expression. -/
def bigOpBindersPattern (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
let ts := processed.map Prod.fst
if ts.size == 1 then
return ts[0]!
else
`(⟨$ts,*⟩)
/-- Collect the terms into a product of sets. -/
def bigOpBindersProd (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
if processed.isEmpty then
`((Finset.univ : Finset Unit))
else if processed.size == 1 then
return processed[0]!.2
else
processed.foldrM (fun s p => `(SProd.sprod $(s.2) $p)) processed.back.2
(start := processed.size - 1)
/--
- `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∑ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∑ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.sum (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∑ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∑" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigsum) "∑ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
/--
- `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∏ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∏ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.prod (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∏ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∏" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigprod) "∏ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsum)
| `(∑ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.sum (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.sum $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
macro_rules (kind := bigprod)
| `(∏ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.prod (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.prod $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
/-- (Deprecated, use `∑ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∑ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigsumin) "∑ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsumin)
| `(∑ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∑ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
/-- (Deprecated, use `∏ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∏ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigprodin) "∏ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigprodin)
| `(∏ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∏ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
open Lean Meta Parser.Term PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.prod`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the product is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.prod] def delabFinsetProd : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∏ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∏ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.sum`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the sum is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.sum] def delabFinsetSum : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∑ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∑ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
end BigOperators
namespace Finset
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_multiset_prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = (s.1.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod
#align finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_map_val [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.1.map f).prod = ∏ a ∈ s, f a :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_map_val Finset.prod_map_val
#align finset.sum_map_val Finset.sum_map_val
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_fold [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = s.fold ((· * ·) : β → β → β) 1 f :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_fold Finset.prod_eq_fold
#align finset.sum_eq_fold Finset.sum_eq_fold
@[simp]
theorem sum_multiset_singleton (s : Finset α) : (s.sum fun x => {x}) = s.val := by
simp only [sum_eq_multiset_sum, Multiset.sum_map_singleton]
#align finset.sum_multiset_singleton Finset.sum_multiset_singleton
end Finset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_prod [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {G : Type*} [FunLike G β γ] [MonoidHomClass G β γ]
(g : G) (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : g (∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g (f x) := by
simp only [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, map_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align map_prod map_prod
#align map_sum map_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, ⇑(f x) :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.coeFn β γ) _ _
#align monoid_hom.coe_finset_prod MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_finset_sum AddMonoidHom.coe_finset_sum
/-- See also `Finset.prod_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"See also `Finset.sum_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ`"]
theorem MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α)
(b : β) : (∏ x ∈ s, f x) b = ∏ x ∈ s, f x b :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.eval b) _ _
#align monoid_hom.finset_prod_apply MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.finset_sum_apply AddMonoidHom.finset_sum_apply
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_empty : ∏ x ∈ ∅, f x = 1 :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_empty Finset.prod_empty
#align finset.sum_empty Finset.sum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_of_empty Finset.prod_of_empty
#align finset.sum_of_empty Finset.sum_of_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (h : a ∉ s) : ∏ x ∈ cons a s h, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.prod_cons Finset.prod_cons
#align finset.sum_cons Finset.sum_cons
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_insert [DecidableEq α] : a ∉ s → ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_insert
#align finset.prod_insert Finset.prod_insert
#align finset.sum_insert Finset.sum_insert
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
by_cases hm : a ∈ s
· simp_rw [insert_eq_of_mem hm]
· rw [prod_insert hm, h hm, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem Finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem
#align finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_one [DecidableEq α] (h : f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
#align finset.prod_insert_one Finset.prod_insert_one
#align finset.sum_insert_zero Finset.sum_insert_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_insert_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) {f : α → M} :
(∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x) / f a = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ∏ x ∈ singleton a, f x = f a :=
Eq.trans fold_singleton <| mul_one _
#align finset.prod_singleton Finset.prod_singleton
#align finset.sum_singleton Finset.sum_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pair [DecidableEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) :
(∏ x ∈ ({a, b} : Finset α), f x) = f a * f b := by
rw [prod_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_pair Finset.prod_pair
#align finset.sum_pair Finset.sum_pair
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const_one : (∏ _x ∈ s, (1 : β)) = 1 := by
simp only [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_const', Multiset.prod_replicate, one_pow]
#align finset.prod_const_one Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.sum_const_zero Finset.sum_const_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_image [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, g x = g y → x = y) → ∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (g x) :=
fold_image
#align finset.prod_image Finset.prod_image
#align finset.sum_image Finset.sum_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_map (s : Finset α) (e : α ↪ γ) (f : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.map e, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (e x) := by
rw [Finset.prod, Finset.map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_map Finset.prod_map
#align finset.sum_map Finset.sum_map
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_attach (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s.attach, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
classical rw [← prod_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn, attach_image_val]
#align finset.prod_attach Finset.prod_attach
#align finset.sum_attach Finset.sum_attach
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem prod_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) : (∀ x ∈ s₂, f x = g x) → s₁.prod f = s₂.prod g := by
rw [h]; exact fold_congr
#align finset.prod_congr Finset.prod_congr
#align finset.sum_congr Finset.sum_congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_one {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ _x ∈ s, 1 := Finset.prod_congr rfl h
_ = 1 := Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_one Finset.prod_eq_one
#align finset.sum_eq_zero Finset.sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjUnion (h) :
∏ x ∈ s₁.disjUnion s₂ h, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjUnion h)
rw [one_mul]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_union Finset.prod_disjUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_union Finset.sum_disjUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjiUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Finset α) (h) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjiUnion t h, f x = ∏ i ∈ s, ∏ x ∈ t i, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjiUnion h)
dsimp [Finset.prod, Multiset.prod, Multiset.fold, Finset.disjUnion, Finset.fold]
congr
exact prod_const_one.symm
#align finset.prod_disj_Union Finset.prod_disjiUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_Union Finset.sum_disjiUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union_inter [DecidableEq α] :
(∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
fold_union_inter
#align finset.prod_union_inter Finset.prod_union_inter
#align finset.sum_union_inter Finset.sum_union_inter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union [DecidableEq α] (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp h]; exact (mul_one _).symm
#align finset.prod_union Finset.prod_union
#align finset.sum_union Finset.sum_union
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
(s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
have := Classical.decEq α
rw [← prod_union (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s s p), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
#align finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
#align finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not Finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not
section ToList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_to_list (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.toList.map f).prod = s.prod f := by
rw [Finset.prod, ← Multiset.prod_coe, ← Multiset.map_coe, Finset.coe_toList]
#align finset.prod_to_list Finset.prod_to_list
#align finset.sum_to_list Finset.sum_to_list
end ToList
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (prod_map s σ.toEmbedding f).symm
exact (map_perm hs).symm
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp Equiv.Perm.prod_comp
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp Equiv.Perm.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp' (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x) x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x (σ.symm x) := by
convert σ.prod_comp s (fun x => f x (σ.symm x)) hs
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp' Equiv.Perm.prod_comp'
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp' Equiv.Perm.sum_comp'
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_insert [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (insert a s).powerset, f t =
(∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) * ∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f (insert a t) := by
rw [powerset_insert, prod_union, prod_image]
· exact insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn.mono fun t ht ↦ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 ht) ha
· aesop (add simp [disjoint_left, insert_subset_iff])
#align finset.prod_powerset_insert Finset.prod_powerset_insert
#align finset.sum_powerset_insert Finset.sum_powerset_insert
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_cons (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (s.cons a ha).powerset, f t = (∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) *
∏ t ∈ s.powerset.attach, f (cons a t $ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 t.2) ha) := by
classical
simp_rw [cons_eq_insert]
rw [prod_powerset_insert ha, prod_attach _ fun t ↦ f (insert a t)]
/-- A product over `powerset s` is equal to the double product over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over `powerset s` is equal to the double sum over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`"]
lemma prod_powerset (s : Finset α) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ powerset s, f t = ∏ j ∈ range (card s + 1), ∏ t ∈ powersetCard j s, f t := by
rw [powerset_card_disjiUnion, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_powerset Finset.prod_powerset
#align finset.sum_powerset Finset.sum_powerset
end CommMonoid
end Finset
section
open Finset
variable [Fintype α] [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompl.prod_mul_prod {s t : Finset α} (h : IsCompl s t) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ t, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(Finset.prod_disjUnion h.disjoint).symm.trans <| by
classical rw [Finset.disjUnion_eq_union, ← Finset.sup_eq_union, h.sup_eq_top]; rfl
#align is_compl.prod_mul_prod IsCompl.prod_mul_prod
#align is_compl.sum_add_sum IsCompl.sum_add_sum
end
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
/-- Multiplying the products of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole product.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype`. -/
@[to_additive "Adding the sums of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole sum.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype`. "]
theorem prod_mul_prod_compl [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
IsCompl.prod_mul_prod isCompl_compl f
#align finset.prod_mul_prod_compl Finset.prod_mul_prod_compl
#align finset.sum_add_sum_compl Finset.sum_add_sum_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_compl_mul_prod [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i) * ∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(@isCompl_compl _ s _).symm.prod_mul_prod f
#align finset.prod_compl_mul_prod Finset.prod_compl_mul_prod
#align finset.sum_compl_add_sum Finset.sum_compl_add_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
(∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_of_subset h]
#align finset.prod_sdiff Finset.prod_sdiff
#align finset.sum_sdiff Finset.sum_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset_one_on_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, g x = 1)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f x = g x) : ∏ i ∈ s₁, f i = ∏ i ∈ s₂, g i := by
rw [← prod_sdiff h, prod_eq_one hg, one_mul]
exact prod_congr rfl hfg
#align finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
#align finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff Finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ → f x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
prod_subset_one_on_sdiff h (by simpa) fun _ _ => rfl
#align finset.prod_subset Finset.prod_subset
#align finset.sum_subset Finset.sum_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_disj_sum (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : Sum α γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, f x = (∏ x ∈ s, f (Sum.inl x)) * ∏ x ∈ t, f (Sum.inr x) := by
rw [← map_inl_disjUnion_map_inr, prod_disjUnion, prod_map, prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_sum Finset.prod_disj_sum
#align finset.sum_disj_sum Finset.sum_disj_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sum_elim (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : α → β) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, Sum.elim f g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by simp
#align finset.prod_sum_elim Finset.prod_sum_elim
#align finset.sum_sum_elim Finset.sum_sum_elim
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_biUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α}
(hs : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) : ∏ x ∈ s.biUnion t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ i ∈ t x, f i := by
rw [← disjiUnion_eq_biUnion _ _ hs, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_bUnion Finset.prod_biUnion
#align finset.sum_bUnion Finset.sum_biUnion
/-- Product over a sigma type equals the product of fiberwise products. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.prod_sigma'`. -/
@[to_additive "Sum over a sigma type equals the sum of fiberwise sums. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.sum_sigma'`"]
theorem prod_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : Sigma σ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x = ∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f ⟨a, s⟩ := by
simp_rw [← disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk, prod_disjiUnion, prod_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
#align finset.prod_sigma Finset.prod_sigma
#align finset.sum_sigma Finset.sum_sigma
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sigma' {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : ∀ a, σ a → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f a s) = ∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x.1 x.2 :=
Eq.symm <| prod_sigma s t fun x => f x.1 x.2
#align finset.prod_sigma' Finset.prod_sigma'
#align finset.sum_sigma' Finset.sum_sigma'
section bij
variable {ι κ α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α}
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the product, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the sum, rather than being a non-dependent function."]
theorem prod_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
congr_arg Multiset.prod (Multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup f g s.2 t.2 i hi i_inj i_surj h)
#align finset.prod_bij Finset.prod_bij
#align finset.sum_bij Finset.sum_bij
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the products, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather than
as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the sums, rather than being non-dependent functions."]
theorem prod_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, ι) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
refine prod_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩) h
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
#align finset.prod_bij' Finset.prod_bij'
#align finset.sum_bij' Finset.sum_bij'
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the sum."]
lemma prod_nbij (i : ι → κ) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set ι).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set ι).SurjOn i t) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj) h
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the products.
The difference with `Finset.prod_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the products, rather than on the entire types.
-/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the sums.
The difference with `Finset.sum_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the sums, rather than on the entire types."]
lemma prod_nbij' (i : ι → κ) (j : κ → ι) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv h
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_equiv (e : ι ≃ κ) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) (hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := by refine prod_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hfg <;> simp [hst]
#align finset.equiv.prod_comp_finset Finset.prod_equiv
#align finset.equiv.sum_comp_finset Finset.sum_equiv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_bijective (e : ι → κ) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t)
(hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := prod_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst hfg
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_injOn (e : ι → κ) (he : Set.InjOn e s) (hest : Set.MapsTo e s t)
(h' : ∀ i ∈ t, i ∉ e '' s → g i = 1) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ j ∈ t, g j := by
classical
exact (prod_nbij e (fun a ↦ mem_image_of_mem e) he (by simp [Set.surjOn_image]) h).trans <|
prod_subset (image_subset_iff.2 hest) <| by simpa using h'
variable [DecidableEq κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f (g i) :=
prod_congr rfl fun j _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hi).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to h]
#align finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to
#align finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x ↦ g x = y, f (g x) :=
prod_congr rfl fun y _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hx).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to h _
variable [Fintype κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
#align finset.prod_fiberwise Finset.prod_fiberwise
#align finset.sum_fiberwise Finset.sum_fiberwise
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise' (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
end bij
/-- Taking a product over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the product over `Fintype.piFinset t`.
`univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`, but differ
in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`. -/
@[to_additive "Taking a sum over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the sum over
`Fintype.piFinset t`. `univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`,
but differ in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`."]
lemma prod_univ_pi [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {κ : ι → Type*} (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i))
(f : (∀ i ∈ (univ : Finset ι), κ i) → β) :
∏ x ∈ univ.pi t, f x = ∏ x ∈ Fintype.piFinset t, f fun a _ ↦ x a := by
apply prod_nbij' (fun x i ↦ x i $ mem_univ _) (fun x i _ ↦ x i) <;> simp
#align finset.prod_univ_pi Finset.prod_univ_pi
#align finset.sum_univ_pi Finset.sum_univ_pi
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_diag [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α × α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s.diag, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f (i, i) := by
apply prod_nbij' Prod.fst (fun i ↦ (i, i)) <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (c, a) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.1, p.2))
apply prod_equiv (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product Finset.prod_finset_product
#align finset.sum_finset_product Finset.sum_finset_product
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product' (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f c a :=
prod_finset_product r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product' Finset.prod_finset_product'
#align finset.sum_finset_product' Finset.sum_finset_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α × γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (a, c) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.2, p.1))
apply prod_equiv ((Equiv.prodComm _ _).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm) <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right Finset.prod_finset_product_right
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right Finset.sum_finset_product_right
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right' (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α → γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f a c :=
prod_finset_product_right r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right' Finset.prod_finset_product_right'
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right' Finset.sum_finset_product_right'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_image' [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} (h : γ → β)
(eq : ∀ c ∈ s, f (g c) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = g c, h x) :
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, h x :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.image g, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = x, h x :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _x hx =>
let ⟨c, hcs, hc⟩ := mem_image.1 hx
hc ▸ eq c hcs
_ = ∏ x ∈ s, h x := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _x => mem_image_of_mem g) _
#align finset.prod_image' Finset.prod_image'
#align finset.sum_image' Finset.sum_image'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mul_distrib : ∏ x ∈ s, f x * g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]; rfl) fold_op_distrib
#align finset.prod_mul_distrib Finset.prod_mul_distrib
#align finset.sum_add_distrib Finset.sum_add_distrib
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_comm (f g h i : α → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, f a * g a) * ∏ a ∈ s, h a * i a = (∏ a ∈ s, f a * h a) * ∏ a ∈ s, g a * i a := by
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_mul_mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product (s ×ˢ t) s (fun _a => t) fun _p => mem_product
#align finset.prod_product Finset.prod_product
#align finset.sum_product Finset.sum_product
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product`"]
theorem prod_product' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y :=
prod_product
#align finset.prod_product' Finset.prod_product'
#align finset.sum_product' Finset.sum_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product_right {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product_right (s ×ˢ t) t (fun _a => s) fun _p => mem_product.trans and_comm
#align finset.prod_product_right Finset.prod_product_right
#align finset.sum_product_right Finset.sum_product_right
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product_right`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product_right`"]
theorem prod_product_right' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_product_right
#align finset.prod_product_right' Finset.prod_product_right'
#align finset.sum_product_right' Finset.sum_product_right'
/-- Generalization of `Finset.prod_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on the outer
variable. -/
@[to_additive "Generalization of `Finset.sum_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on
the outer variable."]
theorem prod_comm' {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α} {t' : Finset α} {s' : α → Finset γ}
(h : ∀ x y, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t x ↔ x ∈ s' y ∧ y ∈ t') {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t x, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t', ∏ x ∈ s' y, f x y := by
classical
have : ∀ z : γ × α, (z ∈ s.biUnion fun x => (t x).map <| Function.Embedding.sectr x _) ↔
z.1 ∈ s ∧ z.2 ∈ t z.1 := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_map, Function.Embedding.sectr_apply, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right, ← and_assoc]
exact
(prod_finset_product' _ _ _ this).symm.trans
((prod_finset_product_right' _ _ _) fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (this _).trans ((h x y).trans and_comm))
#align finset.prod_comm' Finset.prod_comm'
#align finset.sum_comm' Finset.sum_comm'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_comm {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_comm' fun _ _ => Iff.rfl
#align finset.prod_comm Finset.prod_comm
#align finset.sum_comm Finset.sum_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel [CommMonoid γ] {r : β → γ → Prop} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Finset α}
(h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀ a b c, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (∏ x ∈ s, f x) (∏ x ∈ s, g x) := by
delta Finset.prod
apply Multiset.prod_hom_rel <;> assumption
#align finset.prod_hom_rel Finset.prod_hom_rel
#align finset.sum_hom_rel Finset.sum_hom_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_of_ne {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 → p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
(prod_subset (filter_subset _ _)) fun x => by
classical
rw [not_imp_comm, mem_filter]
exact fun h₁ h₂ => ⟨h₁, by simpa using hp _ h₁ h₂⟩
#align finset.prod_filter_of_ne Finset.prod_filter_of_ne
#align finset.sum_filter_of_ne Finset.sum_filter_of_ne
-- If we use `[DecidableEq β]` here, some rewrites fail because they find a wrong `Decidable`
-- instance first; `{∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)}` doesn't work with `rw ← prod_filter_ne_one`
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_ne_one (s : Finset α) [∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)] :
∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_filter_of_ne fun _ _ => id
#align finset.prod_filter_ne_one Finset.prod_filter_ne_one
#align finset.sum_filter_ne_zero Finset.sum_filter_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α → β) :
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 :=
calc
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s.filter p, if p a then f a else 1 :=
prod_congr rfl fun a h => by rw [if_pos]; simpa using (mem_filter.1 h).2
_ = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 := by
{ refine prod_subset (filter_subset _ s) fun x hs h => ?_
rw [mem_filter, not_and] at h
exact if_neg (by simpa using h hs) }
#align finset.prod_filter Finset.prod_filter
#align finset.sum_filter Finset.sum_filter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h : a ∈ s)
(h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ {a}, f x := by
{ refine (prod_subset ?_ ?_).symm
· intro _ H
rwa [mem_singleton.1 H]
· simpa only [mem_singleton] }
_ = f a := prod_singleton _ _
#align finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1)
(h₁ : a ∉ s → f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
by_cases (prod_eq_single_of_mem a · h₀) fun this =>
(prod_congr rfl fun b hb => h₀ b hb <| by rintro rfl; exact this hb).trans <|
prod_const_one.trans (h₁ this).symm
#align finset.prod_eq_single Finset.prod_eq_single
#align finset.sum_eq_single Finset.sum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_left [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₂, a ∉ s₁ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₁, f a :=
Eq.symm <|
prod_subset subset_union_left fun _a ha ha' ↦ hs _ ((mem_union.1 ha).resolve_left ha') ha'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_right [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₁, a ∉ s₂ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₂, f a := by rw [union_comm, prod_union_eq_left hs]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s)
(hn : a ≠ b) (h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; let s' := ({a, b} : Finset α)
have hu : s' ⊆ s := by
refine insert_subset_iff.mpr ?_
apply And.intro ha
apply singleton_subset_iff.mpr hb
have hf : ∀ c ∈ s, c ∉ s' → f c = 1 := by
intro c hc hcs
apply h₀ c hc
apply not_or.mp
intro hab
apply hcs
rw [mem_insert, mem_singleton]
exact hab
rw [← prod_subset hu hf]
exact Finset.prod_pair hn
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (hn : a ≠ b)
(h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) (ha : a ∉ s → f a = 1) (hb : b ∉ s → f b = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; by_cases h₁ : a ∈ s <;> by_cases h₂ : b ∈ s
· exact prod_eq_mul_of_mem a b h₁ h₂ hn h₀
· rw [hb h₂, mul_one]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem a h₁
exact fun c hc hca => h₀ c hc ⟨hca, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩
· rw [ha h₁, one_mul]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem b h₂
exact fun c hc hcb => h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, hcb⟩
· rw [ha h₁, hb h₂, mul_one]
exact
_root_.trans
(prod_congr rfl fun c hc =>
h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩)
prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_mul Finset.prod_eq_mul
#align finset.sum_eq_add Finset.sum_eq_add
-- Porting note: simpNF linter complains that LHS doesn't simplify, but it does
/-- A product over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)
"A sum over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`."]
theorem prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x := by
conv_lhs => erw [← prod_map (s.subtype p) (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f]
exact prod_congr (subtype_map _) fun x _hx => rfl
#align finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter
/-- If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a product
over `s.subtype p` equals that product over `s`. -/
@[to_additive "If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a sum
over `s.subtype p` equals that sum over `s`."]
theorem prod_subtype_of_mem (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter, filter_true_of_mem]
simpa using h
#align finset.prod_subtype_of_mem Finset.prod_subtype_of_mem
#align finset.sum_subtype_of_mem Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem
/-- A product of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
product in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
sum in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`."]
theorem prod_subtype_map_embedding {p : α → Prop} {s : Finset { x // p x }} {f : { x // p x } → β}
{g : α → β} (h : ∀ x : { x // p x }, x ∈ s → g x = f x) :
(∏ x ∈ s.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [Finset.prod_map]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl h
#align finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding Finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding
#align finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding
variable (f s)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort_eq_attach (f : s → β) : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.attach, f i :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach
#align finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := prod_attach _ _
#align finset.prod_coe_sort Finset.prod_coe_sort
#align finset.sum_coe_sort Finset.sum_coe_sort
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_coe (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (∏ i : (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_coe_sort s f
#align finset.prod_finset_coe Finset.prod_finset_coe
#align finset.sum_finset_coe Finset.sum_finset_coe
variable {f s}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtype {p : α → Prop} {F : Fintype (Subtype p)} (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
(f : α → β) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a : Subtype p, f a := by
have : (· ∈ s) = p := Set.ext h
subst p
rw [← prod_coe_sort]
congr!
#align finset.prod_subtype Finset.prod_subtype
#align finset.sum_subtype Finset.sum_subtype
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage' (f : ι → κ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f)] (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter (· ∈ Set.range f), g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ preimage s f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ image f (preimage s f hf), g x :=
Eq.symm <| prod_image <| by simpa only [mem_preimage, Set.InjOn] using hf
_ = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => x ∈ Set.range f, g x := by rw [image_preimage]
#align finset.prod_preimage' Finset.prod_preimage'
#align finset.sum_preimage' Finset.sum_preimage'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∉ Set.range f → g x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
classical rw [prod_preimage', prod_filter_of_ne]; exact fun x hx ↦ Not.imp_symm (hg x hx)
#align finset.prod_preimage Finset.prod_preimage
#align finset.sum_preimage Finset.sum_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage_of_bij (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf.injOn, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
prod_preimage _ _ hf.injOn g fun _ hs h_f ↦ (h_f <| hf.subset_range hs).elim
#align finset.prod_preimage_of_bij Finset.prod_preimage_of_bij
#align finset.sum_preimage_of_bij Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_set_coe (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : (∏ i : s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
(Finset.prod_subtype s.toFinset (fun _ ↦ Set.mem_toFinset) f).symm
/-- The product of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the product of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 1` off `s`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the sum of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 0` off `s`."]
theorem prod_congr_set {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {β : Type*} [Fintype β] (s : Set β)
[DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (f : β → α) (g : s → α) (w : ∀ (x : β) (h : x ∈ s), f x = g ⟨x, h⟩)
(w' : ∀ x : β, x ∉ s → f x = 1) : Finset.univ.prod f = Finset.univ.prod g := by
rw [← @Finset.prod_subset _ _ s.toFinset Finset.univ f _ (by simp)]
· rw [Finset.prod_subtype]
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
exact fun ⟨x, h⟩ _ => w x h
· simp
· rintro x _ h
exact w' x (by simpa using h)
#align finset.prod_congr_set Finset.prod_congr_set
#align finset.sum_congr_set Finset.sum_congr_set
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p}
[DecidablePred fun x => ¬p x] (f : ∀ x : α, p x → γ) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → γ) (h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
calc
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) *
∏ x ∈ s.filter (¬p ·), h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) :=
(prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s p _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ _).symm (prod_attach _ _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_congr rfl fun x _hx ↦
congr_arg h (dif_pos <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
(prod_congr rfl fun x _hx => congr_arg h (dif_neg <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
#align finset.prod_apply_dite Finset.prod_apply_dite
#align finset.sum_apply_dite Finset.sum_apply_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {_hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ)
(h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if p x then f x else g x)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (f x)) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, h (g x) :=
(prod_apply_dite _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ (h ∘ f)) (prod_attach _ (h ∘ g))
#align finset.prod_apply_ite Finset.prod_apply_ite
#align finset.sum_apply_ite Finset.sum_apply_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f : ∀ x : α, p x → β)
(g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, f x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, g x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) := by
simp [prod_apply_dite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_dite Finset.prod_dite
#align finset.sum_dite Finset.sum_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, g x := by
simp [prod_apply_ite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_ite Finset.prod_ite
#align finset.sum_ite Finset.sum_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
rw [prod_ite, filter_false_of_mem, filter_true_of_mem]
· simp only [prod_empty, one_mul]
all_goals intros; apply h; assumption
#align finset.prod_ite_of_false Finset.prod_ite_of_false
#align finset.sum_ite_of_false Finset.sum_ite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
simp_rw [← ite_not (p _)]
apply prod_ite_of_false
simpa
#align finset.prod_ite_of_true Finset.prod_ite_of_true
#align finset.sum_ite_of_true Finset.sum_ite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ) (k : γ → β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) : (∏ x ∈ s, k (if p x then f x else g x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, k (g x) := by
simp_rw [apply_ite k]
exact prod_ite_of_false _ _ h
#align finset.prod_apply_ite_of_false Finset.prod_apply_ite_of_false
#align finset.sum_apply_ite_of_false Finset.sum_apply_ite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ) (k : γ → β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : (∏ x ∈ s, k (if p x then f x else g x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, k (f x) := by
simp_rw [apply_ite k]
exact prod_ite_of_true _ _ h
#align finset.prod_apply_ite_of_true Finset.prod_apply_ite_of_true
#align finset.sum_apply_ite_of_true Finset.sum_apply_ite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_extend_by_one [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (if i ∈ s then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _i hi => if_pos hi
#align finset.prod_extend_by_one Finset.prod_extend_by_one
#align finset.sum_extend_by_zero Finset.sum_extend_by_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_mem [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (if i ∈ t then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i := by
rw [← Finset.prod_filter, Finset.filter_mem_eq_inter]
#align finset.prod_ite_mem Finset.prod_ite_mem
#align finset.sum_ite_mem Finset.sum_ite_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : ∀ x : α, a = x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : a = x then b x h else 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl]
· intros _ _ h
rw [dif_neg]
exact h.symm
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_one]
intros
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
contradiction
#align finset.prod_dite_eq Finset.prod_dite_eq
#align finset.sum_dite_eq Finset.sum_dite_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : ∀ x : α, x = a → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : x = a then b x h else 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl]
· intros _ _ h
rw [dif_neg]
exact h
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_one]
intros
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
contradiction
#align finset.prod_dite_eq' Finset.prod_dite_eq'
#align finset.sum_dite_eq' Finset.sum_dite_eq'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, ite (a = x) (b x) 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq s a fun x _ => b x
#align finset.prod_ite_eq Finset.prod_ite_eq
#align finset.sum_ite_eq Finset.sum_ite_eq
/-- A product taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality test on the index and whose
alternative is `1` has value either the term at that index or `1`.
The difference with `Finset.prod_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `Eq` are swapped. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "A sum taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality
test on the index and whose alternative is `0` has value either the term at that index or `0`.
The difference with `Finset.sum_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `Eq` are swapped."]
theorem prod_ite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, ite (x = a) (b x) 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' s a fun x _ => b x
#align finset.prod_ite_eq' Finset.prod_ite_eq'
#align finset.sum_ite_eq' Finset.sum_ite_eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_index (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ if p then s else t, f x = if p then ∏ x ∈ s, f x else ∏ x ∈ t, f x :=
apply_ite (fun s => ∏ x ∈ s, f x) _ _ _
#align finset.prod_ite_index Finset.prod_ite_index
#align finset.sum_ite_index Finset.sum_ite_index
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_irrel (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : Finset α) (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p then f x else g x) = if p then ∏ x ∈ s, f x else ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
split_ifs with h <;> rfl
#align finset.prod_ite_irrel Finset.prod_ite_irrel
#align finset.sum_ite_irrel Finset.sum_ite_irrel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_irrel (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : Finset α) (f : p → α → β) (g : ¬p → α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : p then f h x else g h x) =
if h : p then ∏ x ∈ s, f h x else ∏ x ∈ s, g h x := by
split_ifs with h <;> rfl
#align finset.prod_dite_irrel Finset.prod_dite_irrel
#align finset.sum_dite_irrel Finset.sum_dite_irrel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_pi_mulSingle' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (x : β) (s : Finset α) :
∏ a' ∈ s, Pi.mulSingle a x a' = if a ∈ s then x else 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' _ _ _
#align finset.prod_pi_mul_single' Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle'
#align finset.sum_pi_single' Finset.sum_pi_single'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_pi_mulSingle {β : α → Type*} [DecidableEq α] [∀ a, CommMonoid (β a)] (a : α)
(f : ∀ a, β a) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ a' ∈ s, Pi.mulSingle a' (f a') a) = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 :=
prod_dite_eq _ _ _
#align finset.prod_pi_mul_single Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α → β) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ s, mulSupport (f i) := by
simp only [mulSupport_subset_iff', Set.mem_iUnion, not_exists, nmem_mulSupport]
exact fun x ↦ prod_eq_one
#align function.mul_support_prod Finset.mulSupport_prod
#align function.support_sum Finset.support_sum
section indicator
open Set
variable {κ : Type*}
/-- Consider a product of `g i (f i)` over a finset. Suppose `g` is a function such as
`n ↦ (· ^ n)`, which maps a second argument of `1` to `1`. Then if `f` is replaced by the
corresponding multiplicative indicator function, the finset may be replaced by a possibly larger
finset without changing the value of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Consider a sum of `g i (f i)` over a finset. Suppose `g` is a function such as
`n ↦ (n • ·)`, which maps a second argument of `0` to `0` (or a weighted sum of `f i * h i` or
`f i • h i`, where `f` gives the weights that are multiplied by some other function `h`). Then if
`f` is replaced by the corresponding indicator function, the finset may be replaced by a possibly
larger finset without changing the value of the sum."]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one [One α] (f : ι → α) (g : ι → α → β) {s t : Finset ι}
(h : s ⊆ t) (hg : ∀ a, g a 1 = 1) :
∏ i ∈ t, g i (mulIndicator ↑s f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, g i (f i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ i ∈ s, g i (mulIndicator ↑s f i) := by rw [prod_subset h fun i _ hn ↦ by simp [hn, hg]]
-- Porting note: This did not use to need the implicit argument
_ = _ := prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ congr_arg _ <| mulIndicator_of_mem (α := ι) hi f
#align set.prod_mul_indicator_subset_of_eq_one Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one
#align set.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero Finset.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero
/-- Taking the product of an indicator function over a possibly larger finset is the same as
taking the original function over the original finset. -/
@[to_additive "Summing an indicator function over a possibly larger `Finset` is the same as summing
the original function over the original finset."]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_subset (f : ι → β) {s t : Finset ι} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∏ i ∈ t, mulIndicator (↑s) f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one _ (fun _ ↦ id) h fun _ ↦ rfl
#align set.prod_mul_indicator_subset Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset
#align set.sum_indicator_subset Finset.sum_indicator_subset
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → κ → β) (t : ι → Set κ) (g : ι → κ)
[DecidablePred fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i] :
∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) (f i) (g i) = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i, f i (g i) := by
refine (prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s (fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i) _).symm.trans <|
Eq.trans (congr_arg₂ (· * ·) ?_ ?_) (mul_one _)
· exact prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ mulIndicator_of_mem (mem_filter.1 hx).2 _
· exact prod_eq_one fun x hx ↦ mulIndicator_of_not_mem (mem_filter.1 hx).2 _
#align finset.prod_mul_indicator_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_inter [DecidableEq ι] (s t : Finset ι) (f : ι → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (t : Set ι).mulIndicator f i = ∏ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i := by
rw [← filter_mem_eq_inter, prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter]; rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_prod (s : Finset ι) (t : Set κ) (f : ι → κ → β) :
mulIndicator t (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator t (f i) :=
map_prod (mulIndicatorHom _ _) _ _
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_prod Finset.mulIndicator_prod
#align set.indicator_finset_sum Finset.indicator_sum
variable {κ : Type*}
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_biUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set κ) {f : κ → β} :
((s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint t) →
mulIndicator (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) f = fun a ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) f a := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s (by simp) fun i s hi ih hs ↦ funext fun j ↦ ?_
rw [prod_insert hi, set_biUnion_insert, mulIndicator_union_of_not_mem_inter,
ih (hs.subset <| subset_insert _ _)]
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, not_and]
exact fun hji i' hi' hji' ↦ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi' hi).symm <|
hs.elim_set (mem_insert_self _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem hi') _ hji hji'
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_bUnion Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion
#align set.indicator_finset_bUnion Finset.indicator_biUnion
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_biUnion_apply (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set κ) {f : κ → β}
(h : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint t) (x : κ) :
mulIndicator (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) f x = ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) f x := by
rw [mulIndicator_biUnion s t h]
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_bUnion_apply Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion_apply
#align set.indicator_finset_bUnion_apply Finset.indicator_biUnion_apply
end indicator
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_bij_ne_one {s : Finset α} {t : Finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 1 → γ) (hi : ∀ a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂, i a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ = i a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, g b ≠ 1 → ∃ a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ = b) (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a = g (i a h₁ h₂)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x := by rw [prod_filter_ne_one]
_ = ∏ x ∈ t.filter fun x => g x ≠ 1, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a ha => i a (mem_filter.mp ha).1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp ha).2)
?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
_ = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := prod_filter_ne_one _
· intros a ha
refine (mem_filter.mp ha).elim ?_
intros h₁ h₂
refine (mem_filter.mpr ⟨hi a h₁ _, ?_⟩)
specialize h a h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
rwa [← h]
· intros a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂
refine (mem_filter.mp ha₁).elim fun _ha₁₁ _ha₁₂ ↦ ?_
refine (mem_filter.mp ha₂).elim fun _ha₂₁ _ha₂₂ ↦ ?_
apply i_inj
· intros b hb
refine (mem_filter.mp hb).elim fun h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂, eq⟩ := i_surj b h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
exact ⟨a, mem_filter.mpr ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, eq⟩
· refine (fun a ha => (mem_filter.mp ha).elim fun h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_)
exact h a h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
#align finset.prod_bij_ne_one Finset.prod_bij_ne_one
#align finset.sum_bij_ne_zero Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x)
(f : ∀ x : α, p x → β) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) = ∏ x : s, g x.val (h x.val x.property) := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x hx => ⟨x, hx⟩) (fun x _ ↦ x) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finset.prod_dite_of_false Finset.prod_dite_of_false
#align finset.sum_dite_of_false Finset.sum_dite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(f : ∀ x : α, p x → β) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) = ∏ x : s, f x.val (h x.val x.property) := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x hx => ⟨x, hx⟩) (fun x _ ↦ x) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finset.prod_dite_of_true Finset.prod_dite_of_true
#align finset.sum_dite_of_true Finset.sum_dite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem nonempty_of_prod_ne_one (h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun H => False.elim <| h <| H.symm ▸ prod_empty) id
#align finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one Finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one
#align finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero Finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one (h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1) : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 1 := by
classical
rw [← prod_filter_ne_one] at h
rcases nonempty_of_prod_ne_one h with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, (mem_filter.1 hx).1, by simpa using (mem_filter.1 hx).2⟩
#align finset.exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one Finset.exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one
#align finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero Finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ_comm (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + 1), f x) = f n * ∏ x ∈ range n, f x := by
rw [range_succ, prod_insert not_mem_range_self]
#align finset.prod_range_succ_comm Finset.prod_range_succ_comm
#align finset.sum_range_succ_comm Finset.sum_range_succ_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + 1), f x) = (∏ x ∈ range n, f x) * f n := by
simp only [mul_comm, prod_range_succ_comm]
#align finset.prod_range_succ Finset.prod_range_succ
#align finset.sum_range_succ Finset.sum_range_succ
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ' (f : ℕ → β) :
∀ n : ℕ, (∏ k ∈ range (n + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ range n, f (k + 1)) * f 0
| 0 => prod_range_succ _ _
| n + 1 => by rw [prod_range_succ _ n, mul_right_comm, ← prod_range_succ' _ n, prod_range_succ]
#align finset.prod_range_succ' Finset.prod_range_succ'
#align finset.sum_range_succ' Finset.sum_range_succ'
@[to_additive]
theorem eventually_constant_prod {u : ℕ → β} {N : ℕ} (hu : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : N ≤ n) :
(∏ k ∈ range n, u k) = ∏ k ∈ range N, u k := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl : n = N + m⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hn
clear hn
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· simp [← add_assoc, prod_range_succ, hm, hu]
#align finset.eventually_constant_prod Finset.eventually_constant_prod
#align finset.eventually_constant_sum Finset.eventually_constant_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_add (f : ℕ → β) (n m : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + m), f x) = (∏ x ∈ range n, f x) * ∏ x ∈ range m, f (n + x) := by
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· erw [Nat.add_succ, prod_range_succ, prod_range_succ, hm, mul_assoc]
#align finset.prod_range_add Finset.prod_range_add
#align finset.sum_range_add Finset.sum_range_add
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_add_div_prod_range {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] (f : ℕ → α) (n m : ℕ) :
(∏ k ∈ range (n + m), f k) / ∏ k ∈ range n, f k = ∏ k ∈ Finset.range m, f (n + k) :=
div_eq_of_eq_mul' (prod_range_add f n m)
#align finset.prod_range_add_div_prod_range Finset.prod_range_add_div_prod_range
#align finset.sum_range_add_sub_sum_range Finset.sum_range_add_sub_sum_range
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_zero (f : ℕ → β) : ∏ k ∈ range 0, f k = 1 := by rw [range_zero, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_range_zero Finset.prod_range_zero
#align finset.sum_range_zero Finset.sum_range_zero
@[to_additive sum_range_one]
theorem prod_range_one (f : ℕ → β) : ∏ k ∈ range 1, f k = f 0 := by
rw [range_one, prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_range_one Finset.prod_range_one
#align finset.sum_range_one Finset.sum_range_one
open List
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_map_count [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) :
(l.map f).prod = ∏ m ∈ l.toFinset, f m ^ l.count m := by
induction' l with a s IH; · simp only [map_nil, prod_nil, count_nil, pow_zero, prod_const_one]
simp only [List.map, List.prod_cons, toFinset_cons, IH]
by_cases has : a ∈ s.toFinset
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_erase has, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ← mul_assoc, count_cons_self, pow_succ']
congr 1
refine prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [count_cons_of_ne (ne_of_mem_erase hx)]
rw [prod_insert has, count_cons_self, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt mem_toFinset.2 has), pow_one]
congr 1
refine prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [count_cons_of_ne]
rintro rfl
exact has hx
#align finset.prod_list_map_count Finset.prod_list_map_count
#align finset.sum_list_map_count Finset.sum_list_map_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_count [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (s : List α) :
s.prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, m ^ s.count m := by simpa using prod_list_map_count s id
#align finset.prod_list_count Finset.prod_list_count
#align finset.sum_list_count Finset.sum_list_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_count_of_subset [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (m : List α) (s : Finset α)
(hs : m.toFinset ⊆ s) : m.prod = ∏ i ∈ s, i ^ m.count i := by
rw [prod_list_count]
refine prod_subset hs fun x _ hx => ?_
rw [mem_toFinset] at hx
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem hx, pow_zero]
#align finset.prod_list_count_of_subset Finset.prod_list_count_of_subset
#align finset.sum_list_count_of_subset Finset.sum_list_count_of_subset
theorem sum_filter_count_eq_countP [DecidableEq α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α) :
∑ x ∈ l.toFinset.filter p, l.count x = l.countP p := by
simp [Finset.sum, sum_map_count_dedup_filter_eq_countP p l]
#align finset.sum_filter_count_eq_countp Finset.sum_filter_count_eq_countP
open Multiset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_map_count [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M]
(f : α → M) : (s.map f).prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, f m ^ s.count m := by
refine Quot.induction_on s fun l => ?_
simp [prod_list_map_count l f]
#align finset.prod_multiset_map_count Finset.prod_multiset_map_count
#align finset.sum_multiset_map_count Finset.sum_multiset_map_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_count [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, m ^ s.count m := by
convert prod_multiset_map_count s id
rw [Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_multiset_count Finset.prod_multiset_count
#align finset.sum_multiset_count Finset.sum_multiset_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_count_of_subset [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (m : Multiset α) (s : Finset α)
(hs : m.toFinset ⊆ s) : m.prod = ∏ i ∈ s, i ^ m.count i := by
revert hs
refine Quot.induction_on m fun l => ?_
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', prod_coe, coe_count]
apply prod_list_count_of_subset l s
#align finset.prod_multiset_count_of_subset Finset.prod_multiset_count_of_subset
#align finset.sum_multiset_count_of_subset Finset.sum_multiset_count_of_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mem_multiset [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (f : { x // x ∈ m } → β) (g : α → β)
(hfg : ∀ x, f x = g x) : ∏ x : { x // x ∈ m }, f x = ∏ x ∈ m.toFinset, g x := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x _ ↦ x) (fun x hx ↦ ⟨x, Multiset.mem_toFinset.1 hx⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp [hfg]
#align finset.prod_mem_multiset Finset.prod_mem_multiset
#align finset.sum_mem_multiset Finset.sum_mem_multiset
/-- To prove a property of a product, it suffices to prove that
the property is multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive "To prove a property of a sum, it suffices to prove that
the property is additive and holds on summands."]
theorem prod_induction {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) (p : M → Prop)
(hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (unit : p 1) (base : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) :
p <| ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
Multiset.prod_induction _ _ hom unit (Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.mpr base)
#align finset.prod_induction Finset.prod_induction
#align finset.sum_induction Finset.sum_induction
/-- To prove a property of a product, it suffices to prove that
the property is multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive "To prove a property of a sum, it suffices to prove that
the property is additive and holds on summands."]
theorem prod_induction_nonempty {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) (p : M → Prop)
(hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (nonempty : s.Nonempty) (base : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) :
p <| ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
Multiset.prod_induction_nonempty p hom (by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty.mp nonempty])
(Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.mpr base)
#align finset.prod_induction_nonempty Finset.prod_induction_nonempty
#align finset.sum_induction_nonempty Finset.sum_induction_nonempty
/-- For any product along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative-monoid-valued function, we can verify
that it's equal to a different function just by checking ratios of adjacent terms.
This is a multiplicative discrete analogue of the fundamental theorem of calculus. -/
@[to_additive "For any sum along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative-monoid-valued function, we can
verify that it's equal to a different function just by checking differences of adjacent terms.
This is a discrete analogue of the fundamental theorem of calculus."]
theorem prod_range_induction (f s : ℕ → β) (base : s 0 = 1)
(step : ∀ n, s (n + 1) = s n * f n) (n : ℕ) :
∏ k ∈ Finset.range n, f k = s n := by
induction' n with k hk
· rw [Finset.prod_range_zero, base]
· simp only [hk, Finset.prod_range_succ, step, mul_comm]
#align finset.prod_range_induction Finset.prod_range_induction
#align finset.sum_range_induction Finset.sum_range_induction
/-- A telescoping product along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative group valued function reduces to
the ratio of the last and first factors. -/
@[to_additive "A telescoping sum along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of an additive commutative group valued
function reduces to the difference of the last and first terms."]
theorem prod_range_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ i ∈ range n, f (i + 1) / f i) = f n / f 0 := by apply prod_range_induction <;> simp
#align finset.prod_range_div Finset.prod_range_div
#align finset.sum_range_sub Finset.sum_range_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_div' {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ i ∈ range n, f i / f (i + 1)) = f 0 / f n := by apply prod_range_induction <;> simp
#align finset.prod_range_div' Finset.prod_range_div'
#align finset.sum_range_sub' Finset.sum_range_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_prod_range_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
f n = f 0 * ∏ i ∈ range n, f (i + 1) / f i := by rw [prod_range_div, mul_div_cancel]
#align finset.eq_prod_range_div Finset.eq_prod_range_div
#align finset.eq_sum_range_sub Finset.eq_sum_range_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_prod_range_div' {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
f n = ∏ i ∈ range (n + 1), if i = 0 then f 0 else f i / f (i - 1) := by
conv_lhs => rw [Finset.eq_prod_range_div f]
simp [Finset.prod_range_succ', mul_comm]
#align finset.eq_prod_range_div' Finset.eq_prod_range_div'
#align finset.eq_sum_range_sub' Finset.eq_sum_range_sub'
/-- A telescoping sum along `{0, ..., n-1}` of an `ℕ`-valued function
reduces to the difference of the last and first terms
when the function we are summing is monotone.
-/
theorem sum_range_tsub [CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α]
[ContravariantClass α α (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] {f : ℕ → α} (h : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, (f (i + 1) - f i) = f n - f 0 := by
apply sum_range_induction
case base => apply tsub_self
case step =>
intro n
have h₁ : f n ≤ f (n + 1) := h (Nat.le_succ _)
have h₂ : f 0 ≤ f n := h (Nat.zero_le _)
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h₂, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h₁]
#align finset.sum_range_tsub Finset.sum_range_tsub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const (b : β) : ∏ _x ∈ s, b = b ^ s.card :=
(congr_arg _ <| s.val.map_const b).trans <| Multiset.prod_replicate s.card b
#align finset.prod_const Finset.prod_const
#align finset.sum_const Finset.sum_const
@[to_additive sum_eq_card_nsmul]
theorem prod_eq_pow_card {b : β} (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = b) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = b ^ s.card :=
(prod_congr rfl hf).trans <| prod_const _
#align finset.prod_eq_pow_card Finset.prod_eq_pow_card
#align finset.sum_eq_card_nsmul Finset.sum_eq_card_nsmul
@[to_additive card_nsmul_add_sum]
theorem pow_card_mul_prod {b : β} : b ^ s.card * ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, b * f a :=
(Finset.prod_const b).symm ▸ prod_mul_distrib.symm
@[to_additive sum_add_card_nsmul]
theorem prod_mul_pow_card {b : β} : (∏ a ∈ s, f a) * b ^ s.card = ∏ a ∈ s, f a * b :=
(Finset.prod_const b).symm ▸ prod_mul_distrib.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_prod_const (b : β) : ∀ n, b ^ n = ∏ _k ∈ range n, b := by simp
#align finset.pow_eq_prod_const Finset.pow_eq_prod_const
#align finset.nsmul_eq_sum_const Finset.nsmul_eq_sum_const
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pow (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ^ n = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) ^ n :=
Multiset.prod_map_pow
#align finset.prod_pow Finset.prod_pow
#align finset.sum_nsmul Finset.sum_nsmul
@[to_additive sum_nsmul_assoc]
lemma prod_pow_eq_pow_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℕ) (a : β) :
∏ i ∈ s, a ^ f i = a ^ ∑ i ∈ s, f i :=
cons_induction (by simp) (fun _ _ _ _ ↦ by simp [prod_cons, sum_cons, pow_add, *]) s
#align finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum Finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum
/-- A product over `Finset.powersetCard` which only depends on the size of the sets is constant. -/
@[to_additive
"A sum over `Finset.powersetCard` which only depends on the size of the sets is constant."]
lemma prod_powersetCard (n : ℕ) (s : Finset α) (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ t ∈ powersetCard n s, f t.card = f n ^ s.card.choose n := by
rw [prod_eq_pow_card, card_powersetCard]; rintro a ha; rw [(mem_powersetCard.1 ha).2]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_flip {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → β) :
(∏ r ∈ range (n + 1), f (n - r)) = ∏ k ∈ range (n + 1), f k := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [prod_range_one, prod_range_one]
· rw [prod_range_succ', prod_range_succ _ (Nat.succ n)]
simp [← ih]
#align finset.prod_flip Finset.prod_flip
#align finset.sum_flip Finset.sum_flip
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_involution {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} :
∀ (g : ∀ a ∈ s, α) (_ : ∀ a ha, f a * f (g a ha) = 1) (_ : ∀ a ha, f a ≠ 1 → g a ha ≠ a)
(g_mem : ∀ a ha, g a ha ∈ s) (_ : ∀ a ha, g (g a ha) (g_mem a ha) = a),
∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; haveI := Classical.decEq β
exact
Finset.strongInductionOn s fun s ih g h g_ne g_mem g_inv =>
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun hs => hs.symm ▸ rfl) fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
have hmem : ∀ y ∈ (s.erase x).erase (g x hx), y ∈ s := fun y hy =>
mem_of_mem_erase (mem_of_mem_erase hy)
have g_inj : ∀ {x hx y hy}, g x hx = g y hy → x = y := fun {x hx y hy} h => by
rw [← g_inv x hx, ← g_inv y hy]; simp [h]
have ih' : (∏ y ∈ erase (erase s x) (g x hx), f y) = (1 : β) :=
ih ((s.erase x).erase (g x hx))
⟨Subset.trans (erase_subset _ _) (erase_subset _ _), fun h =>
not_mem_erase (g x hx) (s.erase x) (h (g_mem x hx))⟩
(fun y hy => g y (hmem y hy)) (fun y hy => h y (hmem y hy))
(fun y hy => g_ne y (hmem y hy))
(fun y hy =>
mem_erase.2
⟨fun h : g y _ = g x hx => by simp [g_inj h] at hy,
mem_erase.2
⟨fun h : g y _ = x => by
have : y = g x hx := g_inv y (hmem y hy) ▸ by simp [h]
simp [this] at hy, g_mem y (hmem y hy)⟩⟩)
fun y hy => g_inv y (hmem y hy)
if hx1 : f x = 1 then
ih' ▸
Eq.symm
(prod_subset hmem fun y hy hy₁ =>
have : y = x ∨ y = g x hx := by
simpa [hy, -not_and, mem_erase, not_and_or, or_comm] using hy₁
this.elim (fun hy => hy.symm ▸ hx1) fun hy =>
h x hx ▸ hy ▸ hx1.symm ▸ (one_mul _).symm)
else by
rw [← insert_erase hx, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
insert_erase (mem_erase.2 ⟨g_ne x hx hx1, g_mem x hx⟩),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ih', mul_one, h x hx]
#align finset.prod_involution Finset.prod_involution
#align finset.sum_involution Finset.sum_involution
/-- The product of the composition of functions `f` and `g`, is the product over `b ∈ s.image g` of
`f b` to the power of the cardinality of the fibre of `b`. See also `Finset.prod_image`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the composition of functions `f` and `g`, is the sum over `b ∈ s.image g`
of `f b` times of the cardinality of the fibre of `b`. See also `Finset.sum_image`."]
theorem prod_comp [DecidableEq γ] (f : γ → β) (g : α → γ) :
∏ a ∈ s, f (g a) = ∏ b ∈ s.image g, f b ^ (s.filter fun a => g a = b).card := by
simp_rw [← prod_const, prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' fun _ ↦ mem_image_of_mem _]
#align finset.prod_comp Finset.prod_comp
#align finset.sum_comp Finset.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_piecewise [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f g : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, (t.piecewise f g) x) = (∏ x ∈ s ∩ t, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s \ t, g x := by
erw [prod_ite, filter_mem_eq_inter, ← sdiff_eq_filter]
#align finset.prod_piecewise Finset.prod_piecewise
#align finset.sum_piecewise Finset.sum_piecewise
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_inter_mul_prod_diff [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s ∩ t, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s \ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (s.prod_piecewise t f f).symm
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Finset.piecewise]
#align finset.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff Finset.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff
#align finset.sum_inter_add_sum_diff Finset.sum_inter_add_sum_diff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s)
(f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f i * ∏ x ∈ s \ {i}, f x := by
convert (s.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff {i} f).symm
simp [h]
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton Finset.prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton
#align finset.sum_eq_add_sum_diff_singleton Finset.sum_eq_add_sum_diff_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s)
(f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = (∏ x ∈ s \ {i}, f x) * f i := by
rw [prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton h, mul_comm]
#align finset.prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul Finset.prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul
#align finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Fintype.prod_eq_mul_prod_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (a : α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i, f i = f a * ∏ i ∈ {a}ᶜ, f i :=
prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton (mem_univ a) f
#align fintype.prod_eq_mul_prod_compl Fintype.prod_eq_mul_prod_compl
#align fintype.sum_eq_add_sum_compl Fintype.sum_eq_add_sum_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Fintype.prod_eq_prod_compl_mul [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (a : α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i ∈ {a}ᶜ, f i) * f a :=
prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem_univ a) f
#align fintype.prod_eq_prod_compl_mul Fintype.prod_eq_prod_compl_mul
#align fintype.sum_eq_sum_compl_add Fintype.sum_eq_sum_compl_add
theorem dvd_prod_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∈ s) : f a ∣ ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
classical
rw [Finset.prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton ha]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align finset.dvd_prod_of_mem Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem
/-- A product can be partitioned into a product of products, each equivalent under a setoid. -/
@[to_additive "A sum can be partitioned into a sum of sums, each equivalent under a setoid."]
theorem prod_partition (R : Setoid α) [DecidableRel R.r] :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ xbar ∈ s.image Quotient.mk'', ∏ y ∈ s.filter (⟦·⟧ = xbar), f y := by
refine (Finset.prod_image' f fun x _hx => ?_).symm
rfl
#align finset.prod_partition Finset.prod_partition
#align finset.sum_partition Finset.sum_partition
/-- If we can partition a product into subsets that cancel out, then the whole product cancels. -/
@[to_additive "If we can partition a sum into subsets that cancel out, then the whole sum cancels."]
theorem prod_cancels_of_partition_cancels (R : Setoid α) [DecidableRel R.r]
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ s.filter fun y => y ≈ x, f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 := by
rw [prod_partition R, ← Finset.prod_eq_one]
intro xbar xbar_in_s
obtain ⟨x, x_in_s, rfl⟩ := mem_image.mp xbar_in_s
simp only [← Quotient.eq] at h
exact h x x_in_s
#align finset.prod_cancels_of_partition_cancels Finset.prod_cancels_of_partition_cancels
#align finset.sum_cancels_of_partition_cancels Finset.sum_cancels_of_partition_cancels
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_update_of_not_mem [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∉ s) (f : α → β)
(b : β) : ∏ x ∈ s, Function.update f i b x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
apply prod_congr rfl
intros j hj
have : j ≠ i := by
rintro rfl
exact h hj
simp [this]
#align finset.prod_update_of_not_mem Finset.prod_update_of_not_mem
#align finset.sum_update_of_not_mem Finset.sum_update_of_not_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_update_of_mem [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s) (f : α → β) (b : β) :
∏ x ∈ s, Function.update f i b x = b * ∏ x ∈ s \ singleton i, f x := by
rw [update_eq_piecewise, prod_piecewise]
simp [h]
#align finset.prod_update_of_mem Finset.prod_update_of_mem
#align finset.sum_update_of_mem Finset.sum_update_of_mem
/-- If a product of a `Finset` of size at most 1 has a given value, so
do the terms in that product. -/
@[to_additive eq_of_card_le_one_of_sum_eq "If a sum of a `Finset` of size at most 1 has a given
value, so do the terms in that sum."]
theorem eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq {s : Finset α} (hc : s.card ≤ 1) {f : α → β} {b : β}
(h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = b) : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = b := by
intro x hx
by_cases hc0 : s.card = 0
· exact False.elim (card_ne_zero_of_mem hx hc0)
· have h1 : s.card = 1 := le_antisymm hc (Nat.one_le_of_lt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0))
rw [card_eq_one] at h1
cases' h1 with x2 hx2
rw [hx2, mem_singleton] at hx
simp_rw [hx2] at h
rw [hx]
rw [prod_singleton] at h
exact h
#align finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq Finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq
#align finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_sum_eq Finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_sum_eq
/-- Taking a product over `s : Finset α` is the same as multiplying the value on a single element
`f a` by the product of `s.erase a`.
See `Multiset.prod_map_erase` for the `Multiset` version. -/
@[to_additive "Taking a sum over `s : Finset α` is the same as adding the value on a single element
`f a` to the sum over `s.erase a`.
See `Multiset.sum_map_erase` for the `Multiset` version."]
theorem mul_prod_erase [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
(f a * ∏ x ∈ s.erase a, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [← prod_insert (not_mem_erase a s), insert_erase h]
#align finset.mul_prod_erase Finset.mul_prod_erase
#align finset.add_sum_erase Finset.add_sum_erase
/-- A variant of `Finset.mul_prod_erase` with the multiplication swapped. -/
@[to_additive "A variant of `Finset.add_sum_erase` with the addition swapped."]
theorem prod_erase_mul [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
(∏ x ∈ s.erase a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_erase s f h]
#align finset.prod_erase_mul Finset.prod_erase_mul
#align finset.sum_erase_add Finset.sum_erase_add
/-- If a function applied at a point is 1, a product is unchanged by
removing that point, if present, from a `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "If a function applied at a point is 0, a sum is unchanged by
removing that point, if present, from a `Finset`."]
theorem prod_erase [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) {f : α → β} {a : α} (h : f a = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s.erase a, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
refine prod_subset sdiff_subset fun x hx hnx => ?_
rw [sdiff_singleton_eq_erase] at hnx
rwa [eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase hx hnx]
#align finset.prod_erase Finset.prod_erase
#align finset.sum_erase Finset.sum_erase
/-- See also `Finset.prod_boole`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_boole`."]
theorem prod_ite_one (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i → p j → i = j) (a : β) :
∏ i ∈ s, ite (p i) a 1 = ite (∃ i ∈ s, p i) a 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨i, hi, hpi⟩ := h
rw [prod_eq_single_of_mem _ hi, if_pos hpi]
exact fun j hj hji ↦ if_neg fun hpj ↦ hji <| h _ hj _ hi hpj hpi
· push_neg at h
rw [prod_eq_one]
exact fun i hi => if_neg (h i hi)
#align finset.prod_ite_one Finset.prod_ite_one
#align finset.sum_ite_zero Finset.sum_ite_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_erase_lt_of_one_lt {γ : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [OrderedCommMonoid γ]
[CovariantClass γ γ (· * ·) (· < ·)] {s : Finset α} {d : α} (hd : d ∈ s) {f : α → γ}
(hdf : 1 < f d) : ∏ m ∈ s.erase d, f m < ∏ m ∈ s, f m := by
conv in ∏ m ∈ s, f m => rw [← Finset.insert_erase hd]
rw [Finset.prod_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase d s)]
exact lt_mul_of_one_lt_left' _ hdf
#align finset.prod_erase_lt_of_one_lt Finset.prod_erase_lt_of_one_lt
#align finset.sum_erase_lt_of_pos Finset.sum_erase_lt_of_pos
/-- If a product is 1 and the function is 1 except possibly at one
point, it is 1 everywhere on the `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "If a sum is 0 and the function is 0 except possibly at one
point, it is 0 everywhere on the `Finset`."]
theorem eq_one_of_prod_eq_one {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} {a : α} (hp : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1)
(h1 : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≠ a → f x = 1) : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1 := by
intro x hx
classical
by_cases h : x = a
· rw [h]
rw [h] at hx
rw [← prod_subset (singleton_subset_iff.2 hx) fun t ht ha => h1 t ht (not_mem_singleton.1 ha),
prod_singleton] at hp
exact hp
· exact h1 x hx h
#align finset.eq_one_of_prod_eq_one Finset.eq_one_of_prod_eq_one
#align finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero Finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive sum_boole_nsmul]
theorem prod_pow_boole [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
(∏ x ∈ s, f x ^ ite (a = x) 1 0) = ite (a ∈ s) (f a) 1 := by simp
#align finset.prod_pow_boole Finset.prod_pow_boole
theorem prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd {S : Finset α} (g1 g2 : α → β) (h : ∀ a ∈ S, g1 a ∣ g2 a) :
S.prod g1 ∣ S.prod g2 := by
classical
induction' S using Finset.induction_on' with a T _haS _hTS haT IH
· simp
· rw [Finset.prod_insert haT, prod_insert haT]
exact mul_dvd_mul (h a <| T.mem_insert_self a) <| IH fun b hb ↦ h b <| mem_insert_of_mem hb
#align finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd
theorem prod_dvd_prod_of_subset {ι M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (s t : Finset ι) (f : ι → M)
(h : s ⊆ t) : (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ∣ ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
Multiset.prod_dvd_prod_of_le <| Multiset.map_le_map <| by simpa
#align finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_subset Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_subset
end CommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [DecidableEq ι] [CancelCommMonoid α] {s t : Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sdiff_eq_prod_sdiff_iff :
∏ i ∈ s \ t, f i = ∏ i ∈ t \ s, f i ↔ ∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
eq_comm.trans $ eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul $ by
rw [← prod_union disjoint_sdiff_self_left, ← prod_union disjoint_sdiff_self_left,
sdiff_union_self_eq_union, sdiff_union_self_eq_union, union_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sdiff_ne_prod_sdiff_iff :
∏ i ∈ s \ t, f i ≠ ∏ i ∈ t \ s, f i ↔ ∏ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
prod_sdiff_eq_prod_sdiff_iff.not
end CancelCommMonoid
theorem card_eq_sum_ones (s : Finset α) : s.card = ∑ x ∈ s, 1 := by simp
#align finset.card_eq_sum_ones Finset.card_eq_sum_ones
theorem sum_const_nat {m : ℕ} {f : α → ℕ} (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = m) :
∑ x ∈ s, f x = card s * m := by
rw [← Nat.nsmul_eq_mul, ← sum_const]
apply sum_congr rfl h₁
#align finset.sum_const_nat Finset.sum_const_nat
lemma sum_card_fiberwise_eq_card_filter {κ : Type*} [DecidableEq κ] (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ)
(g : ι → κ) : ∑ j ∈ t, (s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j).card = (s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t).card := by
simpa only [card_eq_sum_ones] using sum_fiberwise_eq_sum_filter _ _ _ _
lemma card_filter (p) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
(filter p s).card = ∑ a ∈ s, ite (p a) 1 0 := by simp [sum_ite]
#align finset.card_filter Finset.card_filter
section Opposite
open MulOpposite
/-- Moving to the opposite additive commutative monoid commutes with summing. -/
@[simp]
theorem op_sum [AddCommMonoid β] {s : Finset α} (f : α → β) :
op (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, op (f x) :=
map_sum (opAddEquiv : β ≃+ βᵐᵒᵖ) _ _
#align finset.op_sum Finset.op_sum
@[simp]
theorem unop_sum [AddCommMonoid β] {s : Finset α} (f : α → βᵐᵒᵖ) :
unop (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, unop (f x) :=
map_sum (opAddEquiv : β ≃+ βᵐᵒᵖ).symm _ _
#align finset.unop_sum Finset.unop_sum
end Opposite
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_inv_distrib : (∏ x ∈ s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ x ∈ s, f x)⁻¹ :=
Multiset.prod_map_inv
#align finset.prod_inv_distrib Finset.prod_inv_distrib
#align finset.sum_neg_distrib Finset.sum_neg_distrib
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_div_distrib : ∏ x ∈ s, f x / g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) / ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
Multiset.prod_map_div
#align finset.prod_div_distrib Finset.prod_div_distrib
#align finset.sum_sub_distrib Finset.sum_sub_distrib
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_zpow (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) (n : ℤ) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a ^ n = (∏ a ∈ s, f a) ^ n :=
Multiset.prod_map_zpow
#align finset.prod_zpow Finset.prod_zpow
#align finset.sum_zsmul Finset.sum_zsmul
end DivisionCommMonoid
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup β] [DecidableEq α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_sdiff_eq_div (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₂, f x) / ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq', prod_sdiff h]
#align finset.prod_sdiff_eq_div Finset.prod_sdiff_eq_div
#align finset.sum_sdiff_eq_sub Finset.sum_sdiff_eq_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sdiff_div_prod_sdiff :
(∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x) / ∏ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₂, f x) / ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x := by
simp [← Finset.prod_sdiff (@inf_le_left _ _ s₁ s₂), ← Finset.prod_sdiff (@inf_le_right _ _ s₁ s₂)]
#align finset.prod_sdiff_div_prod_sdiff Finset.prod_sdiff_div_prod_sdiff
#align finset.sum_sdiff_sub_sum_sdiff Finset.sum_sdiff_sub_sum_sdiff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_erase_eq_div {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
∏ x ∈ s.erase a, f x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) / f a := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq', prod_erase_mul _ _ h]
#align finset.prod_erase_eq_div Finset.prod_erase_eq_div
#align finset.sum_erase_eq_sub Finset.sum_erase_eq_sub
end CommGroup
@[simp]
theorem card_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) :
card (s.sigma t) = ∑ a ∈ s, card (t a) :=
Multiset.card_sigma _ _
#align finset.card_sigma Finset.card_sigma
@[simp]
theorem card_disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).card = s.sum fun i => (t i).card :=
Multiset.card_bind _ _
#align finset.card_disj_Union Finset.card_disjiUnion
theorem card_biUnion [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : α → Finset β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → Disjoint (t x) (t y)) :
(s.biUnion t).card = ∑ u ∈ s, card (t u) :=
calc
(s.biUnion t).card = ∑ i ∈ s.biUnion t, 1 := card_eq_sum_ones _
_ = ∑ a ∈ s, ∑ _i ∈ t a, 1 := Finset.sum_biUnion h
_ = ∑ u ∈ s, card (t u) := by simp_rw [card_eq_sum_ones]
#align finset.card_bUnion Finset.card_biUnion
theorem card_biUnion_le [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : α → Finset β} :
(s.biUnion t).card ≤ ∑ a ∈ s, (t a).card :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
Finset.induction_on s (by simp) fun a s has ih =>
calc
((insert a s).biUnion t).card ≤ (t a).card + (s.biUnion t).card := by
{ rw [biUnion_insert]; exact Finset.card_union_le _ _ }
_ ≤ ∑ a ∈ insert a s, card (t a) := by rw [sum_insert has]; exact Nat.add_le_add_left ih _
#align finset.card_bUnion_le Finset.card_biUnion_le
theorem card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) : s.card = ∑ a ∈ t, (s.filter fun x => f x = a).card := by
simp only [card_eq_sum_ones, sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to H]
#align finset.card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise Finset.card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise
theorem card_eq_sum_card_image [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) :
s.card = ∑ a ∈ s.image f, (s.filter fun x => f x = a).card :=
card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise fun _ => mem_image_of_mem _
#align finset.card_eq_sum_card_image Finset.card_eq_sum_card_image
theorem mem_sum {f : α → Multiset β} (s : Finset α) (b : β) :
(b ∈ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a := by
classical
refine s.induction_on (by simp) ?_
intro a t hi ih
simp [sum_insert hi, ih, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align finset.mem_sum Finset.mem_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_unique_nonempty {α β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] [Unique α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(h : s.Nonempty) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f default := by
rw [h.eq_singleton_default, Finset.prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_unique_nonempty Finset.prod_unique_nonempty
#align finset.sum_unique_nonempty Finset.sum_unique_nonempty
theorem sum_nat_mod (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) % n = (∑ i ∈ s, f i % n) % n :=
(Multiset.sum_nat_mod _ _).trans <| by rw [Finset.sum, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.sum_nat_mod Finset.sum_nat_mod
theorem prod_nat_mod (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → ℕ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) % n = (∏ i ∈ s, f i % n) % n :=
(Multiset.prod_nat_mod _ _).trans <| by rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_nat_mod Finset.prod_nat_mod
theorem sum_int_mod (s : Finset α) (n : ℤ) (f : α → ℤ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) % n = (∑ i ∈ s, f i % n) % n :=
(Multiset.sum_int_mod _ _).trans <| by rw [Finset.sum, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.sum_int_mod Finset.sum_int_mod
theorem prod_int_mod (s : Finset α) (n : ℤ) (f : α → ℤ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) % n = (∏ i ∈ s, f i % n) % n :=
(Multiset.prod_int_mod _ _).trans <| by rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_int_mod Finset.prod_int_mod
end Finset
namespace Fintype
variable {ι κ α : Type*} [Fintype ι] [Fintype κ]
open Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
/-- `Fintype.prod_bijective` is a variant of `Finset.prod_bij` that accepts `Function.Bijective`.
See `Function.Bijective.prod_comp` for a version without `h`. -/
@[to_additive "`Fintype.sum_bijective` is a variant of `Finset.sum_bij` that accepts
`Function.Bijective`.
See `Function.Bijective.sum_comp` for a version without `h`. "]
lemma prod_bijective (e : ι → κ) (he : e.Bijective) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α)
(h : ∀ x, f x = g (e x)) : ∏ x, f x = ∏ x, g x :=
prod_equiv (.ofBijective e he) (by simp) (by simp [h])
#align fintype.prod_bijective Fintype.prod_bijective
#align fintype.sum_bijective Fintype.sum_bijective
@[to_additive] alias _root_.Function.Bijective.finset_prod := prod_bijective
/-- `Fintype.prod_equiv` is a specialization of `Finset.prod_bij` that
automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Equiv.prod_comp` for a version without `h`.
-/
@[to_additive "`Fintype.sum_equiv` is a specialization of `Finset.sum_bij` that
automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Equiv.sum_comp` for a version without `h`."]
lemma prod_equiv (e : ι ≃ κ) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α) (h : ∀ x, f x = g (e x)) :
∏ x, f x = ∏ x, g x := prod_bijective _ e.bijective _ _ h
#align fintype.prod_equiv Fintype.prod_equiv
#align fintype.sum_equiv Fintype.sum_equiv
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.Function.Bijective.prod_comp {e : ι → κ} (he : e.Bijective) (g : κ → α) :
∏ i, g (e i) = ∏ i, g i := prod_bijective _ he _ _ fun _ ↦ rfl
#align function.bijective.prod_comp Function.Bijective.prod_comp
#align function.bijective.sum_comp Function.Bijective.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.Equiv.prod_comp (e : ι ≃ κ) (g : κ → α) : ∏ i, g (e i) = ∏ i, g i :=
prod_equiv e _ _ fun _ ↦ rfl
#align equiv.prod_comp Equiv.prod_comp
#align equiv.sum_comp Equiv.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_injective (e : ι → κ) (he : Injective e) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α)
(h' : ∀ i ∉ Set.range e, g i = 1) (h : ∀ i, f i = g (e i)) : ∏ i, f i = ∏ j, g j :=
prod_of_injOn e he.injOn (by simp) (by simpa using h') (fun i _ ↦ h i)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise [DecidableEq κ] (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j, ∏ i : {i // g i = j}, f i = ∏ i, f i := by
rw [← Finset.prod_fiberwise _ g f]
congr with j
exact (prod_subtype _ (by simp) _).symm
#align fintype.prod_fiberwise Fintype.prod_fiberwise
#align fintype.sum_fiberwise Fintype.sum_fiberwise
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise' [DecidableEq κ] (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j, ∏ _i : {i // g i = j}, f j = ∏ i, f (g i) := by
rw [← Finset.prod_fiberwise' _ g f]
congr with j
exact (prod_subtype _ (by simp) fun _ ↦ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_unique {α β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] [Unique α] [Fintype α] (f : α → β) :
∏ x : α, f x = f default := by rw [univ_unique, prod_singleton]
#align fintype.prod_unique Fintype.prod_unique
#align fintype.sum_unique Fintype.sum_unique
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_empty {α β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] [IsEmpty α] [Fintype α] (f : α → β) :
∏ x : α, f x = 1 :=
Finset.prod_of_empty _
#align fintype.prod_empty Fintype.prod_empty
#align fintype.sum_empty Fintype.sum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subsingleton {α β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] [Subsingleton α] [Fintype α] (f : α → β)
(a : α) : ∏ x : α, f x = f a := by
haveI : Unique α := uniqueOfSubsingleton a
rw [prod_unique f, Subsingleton.elim default a]
#align fintype.prod_subsingleton Fintype.prod_subsingleton
#align fintype.sum_subsingleton Fintype.sum_subsingleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [CommMonoid β] (p : α → Prop)
(f : α → β) [DecidablePred p] :
(∏ i : { x // p x }, f i) * ∏ i : { x // ¬p x }, f i = ∏ i, f i := by
classical
let s := { x | p x }.toFinset
rw [← Finset.prod_subtype s, ← Finset.prod_subtype sᶜ]
· exact Finset.prod_mul_prod_compl _ _
· simp [s]
· simp [s]
#align fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype
#align fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype Fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype
@[to_additive] lemma prod_subset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} (h : ∀ i, f i ≠ 1 → i ∈ s) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
Finset.prod_subset s.subset_univ $ by simpa [not_imp_comm (a := _ ∈ s)]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_ite_eq_ite_exists (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (h : ∀ i j, p i → p j → i = j)
(a : α) : ∏ i, ite (p i) a 1 = ite (∃ i, p i) a 1 := by
simp [prod_ite_one univ p (by simpa using h)]
variable [DecidableEq ι]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_dite_eq`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_dite_eq`."] lemma prod_dite_eq (i : ι) (f : ∀ j, i = j → α) :
∏ j, (if h : i = j then f j h else 1) = f i rfl := by
rw [Finset.prod_dite_eq, if_pos (mem_univ _)]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_dite_eq'`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_dite_eq'`."] lemma prod_dite_eq' (i : ι) (f : ∀ j, j = i → α) :
∏ j, (if h : j = i then f j h else 1) = f i rfl := by
rw [Finset.prod_dite_eq', if_pos (mem_univ _)]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_ite_eq`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_ite_eq`."]
lemma prod_ite_eq (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : ∏ j, (if i = j then f j else 1) = f i := by
rw [Finset.prod_ite_eq, if_pos (mem_univ _)]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_ite_eq'`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_ite_eq'`."]
lemma prod_ite_eq' (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : ∏ j, (if j = i then f j else 1) = f i := by
rw [Finset.prod_ite_eq', if_pos (mem_univ _)]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_pi_single`."]
lemma prod_pi_mulSingle {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CommMonoid (α i)] (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, α i) :
∏ j, Pi.mulSingle j (f j) i = f i := prod_dite_eq _ _
/-- See also `Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle'`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_pi_single'`."]
lemma prod_pi_mulSingle' (i : ι) (a : α) : ∏ j, Pi.mulSingle i a j = a := prod_dite_eq' _ _
end CommMonoid
end Fintype
namespace Finset
variable [CommMonoid α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_attach_univ [Fintype ι] (f : {i // i ∈ @univ ι _} → α) :
∏ i ∈ univ.attach, f i = ∏ i, f ⟨i, mem_univ _⟩ :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv mem_univ) _ _ $ by simp
#align finset.prod_attach_univ Finset.prod_attach_univ
#align finset.sum_attach_univ Finset.sum_attach_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_erase_attach [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι} (f : ι → α) (i : ↑s) :
∏ j ∈ s.attach.erase i, f ↑j = ∏ j ∈ s.erase ↑i, f j := by
rw [← Function.Embedding.coe_subtype, ← prod_map]
simp [attach_map_val]
end Finset
namespace List
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_toFinset {M : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) :
∀ {l : List α} (_hl : l.Nodup), l.toFinset.prod f = (l.map f).prod
| [], _ => by simp
| a :: l, hl => by
let ⟨not_mem, hl⟩ := List.nodup_cons.mp hl
simp [Finset.prod_insert (mt List.mem_toFinset.mp not_mem), prod_toFinset _ hl]
#align list.prod_to_finset List.prod_toFinset
#align list.sum_to_finset List.sum_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem sum_toFinset_count_eq_length [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
∑ a in l.toFinset, l.count a = l.length := by
simpa using (Finset.sum_list_map_count l fun _ => (1 : ℕ)).symm
end List
namespace Multiset
theorem disjoint_list_sum_left {a : Multiset α} {l : List (Multiset α)} :
Multiset.Disjoint l.sum a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, Multiset.Disjoint b a := by
induction' l with b bs ih
· simp only [zero_disjoint, List.not_mem_nil, IsEmpty.forall_iff, forall_const, List.sum_nil]
· simp_rw [List.sum_cons, disjoint_add_left, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp]
simp [and_congr_left_iff, iff_self_iff, ih]
#align multiset.disjoint_list_sum_left Multiset.disjoint_list_sum_left
theorem disjoint_list_sum_right {a : Multiset α} {l : List (Multiset α)} :
Multiset.Disjoint a l.sum ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, Multiset.Disjoint a b := by
simpa only [@disjoint_comm _ a] using disjoint_list_sum_left
#align multiset.disjoint_list_sum_right Multiset.disjoint_list_sum_right
theorem disjoint_sum_left {a : Multiset α} {i : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
Multiset.Disjoint i.sum a ↔ ∀ b ∈ i, Multiset.Disjoint b a :=
Quotient.inductionOn i fun l => by
rw [quot_mk_to_coe, Multiset.sum_coe]
exact disjoint_list_sum_left
#align multiset.disjoint_sum_left Multiset.disjoint_sum_left
theorem disjoint_sum_right {a : Multiset α} {i : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
Multiset.Disjoint a i.sum ↔ ∀ b ∈ i, Multiset.Disjoint a b := by
simpa only [@disjoint_comm _ a] using disjoint_sum_left
#align multiset.disjoint_sum_right Multiset.disjoint_sum_right
theorem disjoint_finset_sum_left {β : Type*} {i : Finset β} {f : β → Multiset α} {a : Multiset α} :
Multiset.Disjoint (i.sum f) a ↔ ∀ b ∈ i, Multiset.Disjoint (f b) a := by
convert @disjoint_sum_left _ a (map f i.val)
simp [and_congr_left_iff, iff_self_iff]
#align multiset.disjoint_finset_sum_left Multiset.disjoint_finset_sum_left
theorem disjoint_finset_sum_right {β : Type*} {i : Finset β} {f : β → Multiset α}
{a : Multiset α} : Multiset.Disjoint a (i.sum f) ↔ ∀ b ∈ i, Multiset.Disjoint a (f b) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using disjoint_finset_sum_left
#align multiset.disjoint_finset_sum_right Multiset.disjoint_finset_sum_right
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_sum_count_eq (s : Multiset α) : ∑ a in s.toFinset, s.count a = card s := by
simpa using (Finset.sum_multiset_map_count s (fun _ => (1 : ℕ))).symm
#align multiset.to_finset_sum_count_eq Multiset.toFinset_sum_count_eq
@[simp]
theorem sum_count_eq [Fintype α] (s : Multiset α) : ∑ a, s.count a = Multiset.card s := by
rw [← toFinset_sum_count_eq, ← Finset.sum_filter_ne_zero]
congr
ext
simp
theorem count_sum' {s : Finset β} {a : α} {f : β → Multiset α} :
count a (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, count a (f x) := by
dsimp only [Finset.sum]
rw [count_sum]
#align multiset.count_sum' Multiset.count_sum'
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_sum_count_nsmul_eq (s : Multiset α) :
∑ a ∈ s.toFinset, s.count a • {a} = s := by
rw [← Finset.sum_multiset_map_count, Multiset.sum_map_singleton]
#align multiset.to_finset_sum_count_nsmul_eq Multiset.toFinset_sum_count_nsmul_eq
theorem exists_smul_of_dvd_count (s : Multiset α) {k : ℕ}
(h : ∀ a : α, a ∈ s → k ∣ Multiset.count a s) : ∃ u : Multiset α, s = k • u := by
use ∑ a ∈ s.toFinset, (s.count a / k) • {a}
have h₂ :
(∑ x ∈ s.toFinset, k • (count x s / k) • ({x} : Multiset α)) =
∑ x ∈ s.toFinset, count x s • {x} := by
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [← mul_nsmul', Nat.mul_div_cancel' (h x (mem_toFinset.mp hx))]
rw [← Finset.sum_nsmul, h₂, toFinset_sum_count_nsmul_eq]
#align multiset.exists_smul_of_dvd_count Multiset.exists_smul_of_dvd_count
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/Finset.lean | 2,493 | 2,496 | theorem toFinset_prod_dvd_prod [CommMonoid α] (S : Multiset α) : S.toFinset.prod id ∣ S.prod := by |
rw [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
refine Multiset.prod_dvd_prod_of_le ?_
simp [Multiset.dedup_le S]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monad.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
#align_import category_theory.monad.algebra from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"14b69e9f3c16630440a2cbd46f1ddad0d561dee7"
/-!
# Eilenberg-Moore (co)algebras for a (co)monad
This file defines Eilenberg-Moore (co)algebras for a (co)monad,
and provides the category instance for them.
Further it defines the adjoint pair of free and forgetful functors, respectively
from and to the original category, as well as the adjoint pair of forgetful and
cofree functors, respectively from and to the original category.
## References
* [Riehl, *Category theory in context*, Section 5.2.4][riehl2017]
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
universe v₁ u₁
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [category_theory universes].
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
namespace Monad
/-- An Eilenberg-Moore algebra for a monad `T`.
cf Definition 5.2.3 in [Riehl][riehl2017]. -/
structure Algebra (T : Monad C) : Type max u₁ v₁ where
/-- The underlying object associated to an algebra. -/
A : C
/-- The structure morphism associated to an algebra. -/
a : (T : C ⥤ C).obj A ⟶ A
/-- The unit axiom associated to an algebra. -/
unit : T.η.app A ≫ a = 𝟙 A := by aesop_cat
/-- The associativity axiom associated to an algebra. -/
assoc : T.μ.app A ≫ a = (T : C ⥤ C).map a ≫ a := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monad.algebra CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra
-- Porting note: Manually adding aligns.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.A CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.A
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.a CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.a
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.unit CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.unit
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.assoc CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.assoc
attribute [reassoc] Algebra.unit Algebra.assoc
namespace Algebra
variable {T : Monad C}
/-- A morphism of Eilenberg–Moore algebras for the monad `T`. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : Algebra T) where
/-- The underlying morphism associated to a morphism of algebras. -/
f : A.A ⟶ B.A
/-- Compatibility with the structure morphism, for a morphism of algebras. -/
h : (T : C ⥤ C).map f ≫ B.a = A.a ≫ f := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.hom CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.Hom
-- Porting note: Manually adding aligns.
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.hom.f CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.Hom.f
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.hom.h CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.Hom.h
-- Porting note: no need to restate axioms in lean4.
--restate_axiom hom.h
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.h
namespace Hom
/-- The identity homomorphism for an Eilenberg–Moore algebra. -/
def id (A : Algebra T) : Hom A A where f := 𝟙 A.A
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.hom.id CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.Hom.id
instance (A : Algebra T) : Inhabited (Hom A A) :=
⟨{ f := 𝟙 _ }⟩
/-- Composition of Eilenberg–Moore algebra homomorphisms. -/
def comp {P Q R : Algebra T} (f : Hom P Q) (g : Hom Q R) : Hom P R where f := f.f ≫ g.f
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.hom.comp CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.Hom.comp
end Hom
instance : CategoryStruct (Algebra T) where
Hom := Hom
id := Hom.id
comp := @Hom.comp _ _ _
-- Porting note: Adding this ext lemma to help automation below.
@[ext]
lemma Hom.ext' (X Y : Algebra T) (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f.f = g.f) : f = g := Hom.ext _ _ h
@[simp]
theorem comp_eq_comp {A A' A'' : Algebra T} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A' ⟶ A'') :
Algebra.Hom.comp f g = f ≫ g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.comp_eq_comp CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.comp_eq_comp
@[simp]
theorem id_eq_id (A : Algebra T) : Algebra.Hom.id A = 𝟙 A :=
rfl
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.id_eq_id CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.id_eq_id
@[simp]
theorem id_f (A : Algebra T) : (𝟙 A : A ⟶ A).f = 𝟙 A.A :=
rfl
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.id_f CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.id_f
@[simp]
theorem comp_f {A A' A'' : Algebra T} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A' ⟶ A'') : (f ≫ g).f = f.f ≫ g.f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.comp_f CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.comp_f
/-- The category of Eilenberg-Moore algebras for a monad.
cf Definition 5.2.4 in [Riehl][riehl2017]. -/
instance eilenbergMoore : Category (Algebra T) where
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.EilenbergMoore CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.eilenbergMoore
/--
To construct an isomorphism of algebras, it suffices to give an isomorphism of the carriers which
commutes with the structure morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def isoMk {A B : Algebra T} (h : A.A ≅ B.A)
(w : (T : C ⥤ C).map h.hom ≫ B.a = A.a ≫ h.hom := by aesop_cat) : A ≅ B where
hom := { f := h.hom }
inv :=
{ f := h.inv
h := by
rw [h.eq_comp_inv, Category.assoc, ← w, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc]
simp }
#align category_theory.monad.algebra.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Monad.Algebra.isoMk
end Algebra
variable (T : Monad C)
/-- The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category, forgetting the algebraic structure. -/
@[simps]
def forget : Algebra T ⥤ C where
obj A := A.A
map f := f.f
#align category_theory.monad.forget CategoryTheory.Monad.forget
/-- The free functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category, constructing an algebra for any object. -/
@[simps]
def free : C ⥤ Algebra T where
obj X :=
{ A := T.obj X
a := T.μ.app X
assoc := (T.assoc _).symm }
map f :=
{ f := T.map f
h := T.μ.naturality _ }
#align category_theory.monad.free CategoryTheory.Monad.free
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Algebra T) :=
⟨(free T).obj default⟩
-- The other two `simps` projection lemmas can be derived from these two, so `simp_nf` complains if
-- those are added too
/-- The adjunction between the free and forgetful constructions for Eilenberg-Moore algebras for
a monad. cf Lemma 5.2.8 of [Riehl][riehl2017]. -/
@[simps! unit counit]
def adj : T.free ⊣ T.forget :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun X Y =>
{ toFun := fun f => T.η.app X ≫ f.f
invFun := fun f =>
{ f := T.map f ≫ Y.a
h := by
dsimp
simp [← Y.assoc, ← T.μ.naturality_assoc] }
left_inv := fun f => by
ext
dsimp
simp
right_inv := fun f => by
dsimp only [forget_obj]
rw [← T.η.naturality_assoc, Y.unit]
apply Category.comp_id } }
#align category_theory.monad.adj CategoryTheory.Monad.adj
/-- Given an algebra morphism whose carrier part is an isomorphism, we get an algebra isomorphism.
-/
theorem algebra_iso_of_iso {A B : Algebra T} (f : A ⟶ B) [IsIso f.f] : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨{ f := inv f.f
h := by
rw [IsIso.eq_comp_inv f.f, Category.assoc, ← f.h]
simp },
by aesop_cat⟩⟩
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_iso_of_iso CategoryTheory.Monad.algebra_iso_of_iso
instance forget_reflects_iso : T.forget.ReflectsIsomorphisms where
-- Porting note: Is this the right approach to introduce instances?
reflects {_ _} f := fun [IsIso f.f] => algebra_iso_of_iso T f
#align category_theory.monad.forget_reflects_iso CategoryTheory.Monad.forget_reflects_iso
instance forget_faithful : T.forget.Faithful where
#align category_theory.monad.forget_faithful CategoryTheory.Monad.forget_faithful
/-- Given an algebra morphism whose carrier part is an epimorphism, we get an algebra epimorphism.
-/
theorem algebra_epi_of_epi {X Y : Algebra T} (f : X ⟶ Y) [h : Epi f.f] : Epi f :=
(forget T).epi_of_epi_map h
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_epi_of_epi CategoryTheory.Monad.algebra_epi_of_epi
/-- Given an algebra morphism whose carrier part is a monomorphism, we get an algebra monomorphism.
-/
theorem algebra_mono_of_mono {X Y : Algebra T} (f : X ⟶ Y) [h : Mono f.f] : Mono f :=
(forget T).mono_of_mono_map h
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_mono_of_mono CategoryTheory.Monad.algebra_mono_of_mono
instance : T.forget.IsRightAdjoint :=
⟨T.free, ⟨T.adj⟩⟩
/--
Given a monad morphism from `T₂` to `T₁`, we get a functor from the algebras of `T₁` to algebras of
`T₂`.
-/
@[simps]
def algebraFunctorOfMonadHom {T₁ T₂ : Monad C} (h : T₂ ⟶ T₁) : Algebra T₁ ⥤ Algebra T₂ where
obj A :=
{ A := A.A
a := h.app A.A ≫ A.a
unit := by
dsimp
simp [A.unit]
assoc := by
dsimp
simp [A.assoc] }
map f := { f := f.f }
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_functor_of_monad_hom CategoryTheory.Monad.algebraFunctorOfMonadHom
/--
The identity monad morphism induces the identity functor from the category of algebras to itself.
-/
-- Porting note: `semireducible -> default`
@[simps (config := { rhsMd := .default })]
def algebraFunctorOfMonadHomId {T₁ : Monad C} : algebraFunctorOfMonadHom (𝟙 T₁) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun X => Algebra.isoMk (Iso.refl _)
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_id CategoryTheory.Monad.algebraFunctorOfMonadHomId
/-- A composition of monad morphisms gives the composition of corresponding functors.
-/
@[simps (config := { rhsMd := .default })]
def algebraFunctorOfMonadHomComp {T₁ T₂ T₃ : Monad C} (f : T₁ ⟶ T₂) (g : T₂ ⟶ T₃) :
algebraFunctorOfMonadHom (f ≫ g) ≅ algebraFunctorOfMonadHom g ⋙ algebraFunctorOfMonadHom f :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun X => Algebra.isoMk (Iso.refl _)
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_comp CategoryTheory.Monad.algebraFunctorOfMonadHomComp
/-- If `f` and `g` are two equal morphisms of monads, then the functors of algebras induced by them
are isomorphic.
We define it like this as opposed to using `eqToIso` so that the components are nicer to prove
lemmas about.
-/
@[simps (config := { rhsMd := .default })]
def algebraFunctorOfMonadHomEq {T₁ T₂ : Monad C} {f g : T₁ ⟶ T₂} (h : f = g) :
algebraFunctorOfMonadHom f ≅ algebraFunctorOfMonadHom g :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun X => Algebra.isoMk (Iso.refl _)
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_eq CategoryTheory.Monad.algebraFunctorOfMonadHomEq
/-- Isomorphic monads give equivalent categories of algebras. Furthermore, they are equivalent as
categories over `C`, that is, we have `algebraEquivOfIsoMonads h ⋙ forget = forget`.
-/
@[simps]
def algebraEquivOfIsoMonads {T₁ T₂ : Monad C} (h : T₁ ≅ T₂) : Algebra T₁ ≌ Algebra T₂ where
functor := algebraFunctorOfMonadHom h.inv
inverse := algebraFunctorOfMonadHom h.hom
unitIso :=
algebraFunctorOfMonadHomId.symm ≪≫
algebraFunctorOfMonadHomEq (by simp) ≪≫ algebraFunctorOfMonadHomComp _ _
counitIso :=
(algebraFunctorOfMonadHomComp _ _).symm ≪≫
algebraFunctorOfMonadHomEq (by simp) ≪≫ algebraFunctorOfMonadHomId
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_equiv_of_iso_monads CategoryTheory.Monad.algebraEquivOfIsoMonads
@[simp]
theorem algebra_equiv_of_iso_monads_comp_forget {T₁ T₂ : Monad C} (h : T₁ ⟶ T₂) :
algebraFunctorOfMonadHom h ⋙ forget _ = forget _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.monad.algebra_equiv_of_iso_monads_comp_forget CategoryTheory.Monad.algebra_equiv_of_iso_monads_comp_forget
end Monad
namespace Comonad
/-- An Eilenberg-Moore coalgebra for a comonad `T`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): linter not ported yet
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure Coalgebra (G : Comonad C) : Type max u₁ v₁ where
/-- The underlying object associated to a coalgebra. -/
A : C
/-- The structure morphism associated to a coalgebra. -/
a : A ⟶ (G : C ⥤ C).obj A
/-- The counit axiom associated to a coalgebra. -/
counit : a ≫ G.ε.app A = 𝟙 A := by aesop_cat
/-- The coassociativity axiom associated to a coalgebra. -/
coassoc : a ≫ G.δ.app A = a ≫ G.map a := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra
-- Porting note: manually adding aligns.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.A CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.A
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.a CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.a
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.counit CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.counit
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.coassoc CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.coassoc
-- Porting note: no need to restate axioms in lean4.
--restate_axiom coalgebra.counit'
--restate_axiom coalgebra.coassoc'
attribute [reassoc] Coalgebra.counit Coalgebra.coassoc
namespace Coalgebra
variable {G : Comonad C}
/-- A morphism of Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras for the comonad `G`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): linter not ported yet
--@[ext, nolint has_nonempty_instance]
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : Coalgebra G) where
/-- The underlying morphism associated to a morphism of coalgebras. -/
f : A.A ⟶ B.A
/-- Compatibility with the structure morphism, for a morphism of coalgebras. -/
h : A.a ≫ (G : C ⥤ C).map f = f ≫ B.a := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.hom CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.Hom
-- Porting note: Manually adding aligns.
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.hom.f CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.Hom.f
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.hom.h CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.Hom.h
-- Porting note: no need to restate axioms in lean4.
--restate_axiom hom.h
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.h
namespace Hom
/-- The identity homomorphism for an Eilenberg–Moore coalgebra. -/
def id (A : Coalgebra G) : Hom A A where f := 𝟙 A.A
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.hom.id CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.Hom.id
/-- Composition of Eilenberg–Moore coalgebra homomorphisms. -/
def comp {P Q R : Coalgebra G} (f : Hom P Q) (g : Hom Q R) : Hom P R where f := f.f ≫ g.f
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.hom.comp CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.Hom.comp
end Hom
/-- The category of Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras for a comonad. -/
instance : CategoryStruct (Coalgebra G) where
Hom := Hom
id := Hom.id
comp := @Hom.comp _ _ _
-- Porting note: Adding ext lemma to help automation below.
@[ext]
lemma Hom.ext' (X Y : Coalgebra G) (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f.f = g.f) : f = g := Hom.ext _ _ h
@[simp]
theorem comp_eq_comp {A A' A'' : Coalgebra G} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A' ⟶ A'') :
Coalgebra.Hom.comp f g = f ≫ g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.comp_eq_comp CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.comp_eq_comp
@[simp]
theorem id_eq_id (A : Coalgebra G) : Coalgebra.Hom.id A = 𝟙 A :=
rfl
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.id_eq_id CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.id_eq_id
@[simp]
theorem id_f (A : Coalgebra G) : (𝟙 A : A ⟶ A).f = 𝟙 A.A :=
rfl
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.id_f CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.id_f
@[simp]
theorem comp_f {A A' A'' : Coalgebra G} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A' ⟶ A'') : (f ≫ g).f = f.f ≫ g.f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.comp_f CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.comp_f
/-- The category of Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras for a comonad. -/
instance eilenbergMoore : Category (Coalgebra G) where
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.EilenbergMoore CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.eilenbergMoore
/--
To construct an isomorphism of coalgebras, it suffices to give an isomorphism of the carriers which
commutes with the structure morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def isoMk {A B : Coalgebra G} (h : A.A ≅ B.A)
(w : A.a ≫ (G : C ⥤ C).map h.hom = h.hom ≫ B.a := by aesop_cat) : A ≅ B where
hom := { f := h.hom }
inv :=
{ f := h.inv
h := by
rw [h.eq_inv_comp, ← reassoc_of% w, ← Functor.map_comp]
simp }
#align category_theory.comonad.coalgebra.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Comonad.Coalgebra.isoMk
end Coalgebra
variable (G : Comonad C)
/-- The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category, forgetting the coalgebraic
structure. -/
@[simps]
def forget : Coalgebra G ⥤ C where
obj A := A.A
map f := f.f
#align category_theory.comonad.forget CategoryTheory.Comonad.forget
/-- The cofree functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category, constructing a coalgebra for any
object. -/
@[simps]
def cofree : C ⥤ Coalgebra G where
obj X :=
{ A := G.obj X
a := G.δ.app X
coassoc := (G.coassoc _).symm }
map f :=
{ f := G.map f
h := (G.δ.naturality _).symm }
#align category_theory.comonad.cofree CategoryTheory.Comonad.cofree
-- The other two `simps` projection lemmas can be derived from these two, so `simp_nf` complains if
-- those are added too
/-- The adjunction between the cofree and forgetful constructions for Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras
for a comonad.
-/
@[simps! unit counit]
def adj : G.forget ⊣ G.cofree :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun X Y =>
{ toFun := fun f =>
{ f := X.a ≫ G.map f
h := by
dsimp
simp [← Coalgebra.coassoc_assoc] }
invFun := fun g => g.f ≫ G.ε.app Y
left_inv := fun f => by
dsimp
rw [Category.assoc, G.ε.naturality, Functor.id_map, X.counit_assoc]
right_inv := fun g => by
ext1; dsimp
rw [Functor.map_comp, g.h_assoc, cofree_obj_a, Comonad.right_counit]
apply comp_id } }
#align category_theory.comonad.adj CategoryTheory.Comonad.adj
/-- Given a coalgebra morphism whose carrier part is an isomorphism, we get a coalgebra isomorphism.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monad/Algebra.lean | 472 | 477 | theorem coalgebra_iso_of_iso {A B : Coalgebra G} (f : A ⟶ B) [IsIso f.f] : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨{ f := inv f.f
h := by |
rw [IsIso.eq_inv_comp f.f, ← f.h_assoc]
simp },
by aesop_cat⟩⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import analysis.convex.between from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"571e13cacbed7bf042fd3058ce27157101433842"
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
#align affine_segment affineSegment
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
#align affine_segment_eq_segment affineSegment_eq_segment
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
#align affine_segment_comm affineSegment_comm
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
#align left_mem_affine_segment left_mem_affineSegment
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
#align right_mem_affine_segment right_mem_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
-- Porting note: added as this doesn't do anything in `simp_rw` any more
rw [affineSegment]
-- Note: when adding "simp made no progress" in lean4#2336,
-- had to change `lineMap_same` to `lineMap_same _`. Not sure why?
-- Porting note: added `_ _` and `Function.const`
simp_rw [lineMap_same _, AffineMap.coe_const _ _, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
#align affine_segment_same affineSegment_same
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
#align affine_segment_image affineSegment_image
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vadd_image affineSegment_const_vadd_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_vadd_const_image affineSegment_vadd_const_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vsub_image affineSegment_const_vsub_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_vsub_const_image affineSegment_vsub_const_image
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vadd_affine_segment mem_const_vadd_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vadd_const_affine_segment mem_vadd_const_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vsub_affine_segment mem_const_vsub_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vsub_const_affine_segment mem_vsub_const_affineSegment
variable (R)
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
#align wbtw Wbtw
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
#align sbtw Sbtw
variable {R}
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align wbtw.map Wbtw.map
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
#align function.injective.wbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
#align function.injective.sbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.wbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.sbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vadd_iff wbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vadd_const_iff wbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vsub_iff wbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vsub_const_iff wbtw_vsub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vadd_iff sbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vadd_const_iff sbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vsub_iff sbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vsub_const_iff sbtw_vsub_const_iff
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
#align sbtw.wbtw Sbtw.wbtw
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
#align sbtw.ne_left Sbtw.ne_left
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
#align sbtw.left_ne Sbtw.left_ne
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
#align sbtw.ne_right Sbtw.ne_right
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
#align sbtw.right_ne Sbtw.right_ne
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
#align sbtw.mem_image_Ioo Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align wbtw.mem_affine_span Wbtw.mem_affineSpan
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
#align wbtw_comm wbtw_comm
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
#align wbtw.symm Wbtw.symm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
#align sbtw_comm sbtw_comm
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
#align sbtw.symm Sbtw.symm
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_left wbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_right wbtw_self_right
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· -- Porting note: Originally `simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h`
have ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := h
rw [h₂.symm, lineMap_same_apply]
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
#align wbtw_self_iff wbtw_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_left not_sbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_right not_sbtw_self_right
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
#align wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
#align wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
#align sbtw.left_ne_right Sbtw.left_ne_right
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
#align sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self not_sbtw_self
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨wbtw_self_left _ _ _, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
#align wbtw_swap_left_iff wbtw_swap_left_iff
theorem wbtw_swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_comm (z := y), eq_comm]
exact wbtw_swap_left_iff R x
#align wbtw_swap_right_iff wbtw_swap_right_iff
theorem wbtw_rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_swap_right_iff, eq_comm]
#align wbtw_rotate_iff wbtw_rotate_iff
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_swap_left_iff R z, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.swap_left_iff Wbtw.swap_left_iff
theorem Wbtw.swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by rw [← wbtw_swap_right_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.swap_right_iff Wbtw.swap_right_iff
theorem Wbtw.rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_rotate_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.rotate_iff Wbtw.rotate_iff
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R y x z := fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.swap_left_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_swap_left Sbtw.not_swap_left
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R x z y := fun hs => h.ne_right (h.wbtw.swap_right_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_swap_right Sbtw.not_swap_right
theorem Sbtw.not_rotate [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : ¬Wbtw R z x y :=
fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.rotate_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_rotate Sbtw.not_rotate
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Wbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, lineMap_same_apply]
simp
rw [or_iff_right hxy, Wbtw, affineSegment, (lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
#align wbtw_line_map_iff wbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Sbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne, and_comm, and_congr_right]
intro hxy
rw [(lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
#align sbtw_line_map_iff sbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Wbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 :=
wbtw_lineMap_iff
#align wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Sbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 :=
sbtw_lineMap_iff
#align sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment, Set.mem_image]
simp_rw [lineMap_apply_ring]
simp
#align wbtw_zero_one_iff wbtw_zero_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_zero_one_iff]
#align wbtw_one_zero_iff wbtw_one_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Sbtw, wbtw_zero_one_iff, Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_Ioo]
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1.1.lt_of_ne (Ne.symm h.2.1), h.1.2.lt_of_ne h.2.2⟩, fun h =>
⟨⟨h.1.le, h.2.le⟩, h.1.ne', h.2.ne⟩⟩
#align sbtw_zero_one_iff sbtw_zero_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_comm, sbtw_zero_one_iff]
#align sbtw_one_zero_iff sbtw_one_zero_iff
theorem Wbtw.trans_left {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z) (h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : Wbtw R w x z := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨t₂ * t₁, ⟨mul_nonneg ht₂.1 ht₁.1, mul_le_one ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁.2⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, lineMap_vsub_left, smul_smul]
#align wbtw.trans_left Wbtw.trans_left
theorem Wbtw.trans_right {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z) (h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R w y z := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_left h₂
#align wbtw.trans_right Wbtw.trans_right
theorem Wbtw.trans_sbtw_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R w x y) : Sbtw R w x z := by
refine ⟨h₁.trans_left h₂.wbtw, h₂.ne_left, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact h₂.right_ne ((wbtw_swap_right_iff R w).1 ⟨h₁, h₂.wbtw⟩)
#align wbtw.trans_sbtw_left Wbtw.trans_sbtw_left
theorem Wbtw.trans_sbtw_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R x y z) : Sbtw R w y z := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
rw [sbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_sbtw_left h₂
#align wbtw.trans_sbtw_right Wbtw.trans_sbtw_right
theorem Sbtw.trans_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R w x y) : Sbtw R w x z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_sbtw_left h₂
#align sbtw.trans_left Sbtw.trans_left
theorem Sbtw.trans_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R x y z) : Sbtw R w y z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_sbtw_right h₂
#align sbtw.trans_right Sbtw.trans_right
theorem Wbtw.trans_left_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) (h : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
exact h (h₁.swap_right_iff.1 h₂)
#align wbtw.trans_left_ne Wbtw.trans_left_ne
theorem Wbtw.trans_right_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) (h : w ≠ x) : w ≠ y := by
rintro rfl
exact h (h₁.swap_left_iff.1 h₂)
#align wbtw.trans_right_ne Wbtw.trans_right_ne
theorem Sbtw.trans_wbtw_left_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : x ≠ z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_left_ne h₂ h₁.ne_right
#align sbtw.trans_wbtw_left_ne Sbtw.trans_wbtw_left_ne
theorem Sbtw.trans_wbtw_right_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) : w ≠ y :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_right_ne h₂ h₁.left_ne
#align sbtw.trans_wbtw_right_ne Sbtw.trans_wbtw_right_ne
theorem Sbtw.affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_pair [NoZeroDivisors R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V]
{ι : Type*} {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent R p) {w w₁ w₂ : ι → R} {s : Finset ι}
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1)
(h : s.affineCombination R p w ∈
line[R, s.affineCombination R p w₁, s.affineCombination R p w₂])
{i : ι} (his : i ∈ s) (hs : Sbtw R (w₁ i) (w i) (w₂ i)) :
Sbtw R (s.affineCombination R p w₁) (s.affineCombination R p w)
(s.affineCombination R p w₂) := by
rw [affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_pair ha hw hw₁ hw₂] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr i his, sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff] at hs
change ∀ i ∈ s, w i = (r • (w₂ - w₁) + w₁) i at hr
rw [s.affineCombination_congr hr fun _ _ => rfl]
rw [← s.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, s.weightedVSub_const_smul,
← s.affineCombination_vsub, ← lineMap_apply, sbtw_lineMap_iff, and_iff_left hs.2,
← @vsub_ne_zero V, s.affineCombination_vsub]
intro hz
have hw₁w₂ : (∑ i ∈ s, (w₁ - w₂) i) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, hw₁, hw₂, sub_self]
refine hs.1 ?_
have ha' := ha s (w₁ - w₂) hw₁w₂ hz i his
rwa [Pi.sub_apply, sub_eq_zero] at ha'
#align sbtw.affine_combination_of_mem_affine_span_pair Sbtw.affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_pair
end OrderedRing
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [StrictOrderedCommRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (y -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ y) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
simp_rw [lineMap_apply]
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap; · simp
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap; · simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
simp only [vadd_vsub, smul_smul, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← sub_smul]
ring_nf
#align wbtw.same_ray_vsub Wbtw.sameRay_vsub
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (y -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ x) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, _⟩, rfl⟩
simpa [lineMap_apply] using SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left (z -ᵥ x) ht0
#align wbtw.same_ray_vsub_left Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_left
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (z -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ y) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨_, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
simpa [lineMap_apply, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_smul] using
SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_right (z -ᵥ x) (sub_nonneg.2 ht1)
#align wbtw.same_ray_vsub_right Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_right
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable {R}
/-- Suppose lines from two vertices of a triangle to interior points of the opposite side meet at
`p`. Then `p` lies in the interior of the first (and by symmetry the other) segment from a
vertex to the point on the opposite side. -/
theorem sbtw_of_sbtw_of_sbtw_of_mem_affineSpan_pair [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V]
{t : Affine.Triangle R P} {i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3} (h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) {p₁ p₂ p : P}
(h₁ : Sbtw R (t.points i₂) p₁ (t.points i₃)) (h₂ : Sbtw R (t.points i₁) p₂ (t.points i₃))
(h₁' : p ∈ line[R, t.points i₁, p₁]) (h₂' : p ∈ line[R, t.points i₂, p₂]) :
Sbtw R (t.points i₁) p p₁ := by
-- Should not be needed; see comments on local instances in `Data.Sign`.
letI : DecidableRel ((· < ·) : R → R → Prop) := LinearOrderedRing.decidableLT
have h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃ := by
rintro rfl
simp at h₂
have h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃ := by
rintro rfl
simp at h₁
have h3 : ∀ i : Fin 3, i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ ∨ i = i₃ := by
clear h₁ h₂ h₁' h₂'
-- Porting note: Originally `decide!`
intro i
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases i₁ <;> fin_cases i₂ <;> fin_cases i₃ <;> simp at h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ ⊢
have hu : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin 3)) = {i₁, i₂, i₃} := by
clear h₁ h₂ h₁' h₂'
-- Porting note: Originally `decide!`
fin_cases i₁ <;> fin_cases i₂ <;> fin_cases i₃
<;> simp (config := {decide := true}) at h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ ⊢
have hp : p ∈ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
have hle : line[R, t.points i₁, p₁] ≤ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
refine affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem (mem_affineSpan R (Set.mem_range_self _)) ?_
have hle : line[R, t.points i₂, t.points i₃] ≤ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
refine affineSpan_mono R ?_
simp [Set.insert_subset_iff]
rw [AffineSubspace.le_def'] at hle
exact hle _ h₁.wbtw.mem_affineSpan
rw [AffineSubspace.le_def'] at hle
exact hle _ h₁'
have h₁i := h₁.mem_image_Ioo
have h₂i := h₂.mem_image_Ioo
rw [Set.mem_image] at h₁i h₂i
rcases h₁i with ⟨r₁, ⟨hr₁0, hr₁1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases h₂i with ⟨r₂, ⟨hr₂0, hr₂1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_of_fintype hp with ⟨w, hw, rfl⟩
have h₁s :=
sign_eq_of_affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_single_lineMap t.independent hw (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ hr₁0 hr₁1 h₁'
have h₂s :=
sign_eq_of_affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_single_lineMap t.independent hw (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) h₁₂.symm h₂₃ h₁₃ hr₂0 hr₂1 h₂'
rw [← Finset.univ.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights R t.points
(Finset.mem_univ i₁),
← Finset.univ.affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights t.points (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _)] at h₁' ⊢
refine
Sbtw.affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_pair t.independent hw
(Finset.univ.sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights R (Finset.mem_univ _))
(Finset.univ.sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights (Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) _)
h₁' (Finset.mem_univ i₁) ?_
rw [Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self,
Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne h₁₂ h₁₃, sbtw_one_zero_iff]
have hs : ∀ i : Fin 3, SignType.sign (w i) = SignType.sign (w i₃) := by
intro i
rcases h3 i with (rfl | rfl | rfl)
· exact h₂s
· exact h₁s
· rfl
have hss : SignType.sign (∑ i, w i) = 1 := by simp [hw]
have hs' := sign_sum Finset.univ_nonempty (SignType.sign (w i₃)) fun i _ => hs i
rw [hs'] at hss
simp_rw [hss, sign_eq_one_iff] at hs
refine ⟨hs i₁, ?_⟩
rw [hu] at hw
rw [Finset.sum_insert, Finset.sum_insert, Finset.sum_singleton] at hw
· by_contra hle
rw [not_lt] at hle
exact (hle.trans_lt (lt_add_of_pos_right _ (Left.add_pos (hs i₂) (hs i₃)))).ne' hw
· simpa using h₂₃
· simpa [not_or] using ⟨h₁₂, h₁₃⟩
#align sbtw_of_sbtw_of_sbtw_of_mem_affine_span_pair sbtw_of_sbtw_of_sbtw_of_mem_affineSpan_pair
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable {R}
theorem wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici {x y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ↔ x = y ∨ z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases hr0.lt_or_eq with (hr0' | rfl)
· rw [Set.mem_image]
refine Or.inr ⟨r⁻¹, one_le_inv hr0' hr1, ?_⟩
simp only [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, vadd_vsub]
rw [inv_mul_cancel hr0'.ne', one_smul, vsub_vadd]
· simp
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩)
· exact wbtw_self_left _ _ _
· rw [Set.mem_Ici] at hr
refine ⟨r⁻¹, ⟨inv_nonneg.2 (zero_le_one.trans hr), inv_le_one hr⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, vadd_vsub]
rw [inv_mul_cancel (one_pos.trans_le hr).ne', one_smul, vsub_vadd]
#align wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici
theorem Wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : x ≠ y) :
z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) :=
(wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici.1 h).resolve_left hne
#align wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne Wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne
theorem Wbtw.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : x ≠ y) :
z ∈ line[R, x, y] := by
rcases h.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne hne with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align wbtw.right_mem_affine_span_of_left_ne Wbtw.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne
theorem sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ x ≠ y ∧ z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_ne, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩ := h.wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne h.left_ne
rw [Set.mem_Ici] at hr
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (hrlt | rfl)
· exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hrlt
· exfalso
simp at h
· rcases h with ⟨hne, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hr
refine
⟨wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici.2
(Or.inr (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hr Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self))),
hne.symm, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub]
nth_rw 1 [← one_smul R (y -ᵥ x)]
rw [← sub_smul, smul_ne_zero_iff, vsub_ne_zero, sub_ne_zero]
exact ⟨hr.ne, hne.symm⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_IoI sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi
theorem Sbtw.right_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) :=
(sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi.1 h).2
#align sbtw.right_mem_image_Ioi Sbtw.right_mem_image_Ioi
theorem Sbtw.right_mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ∈ line[R, x, y] :=
h.wbtw.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne h.left_ne
#align sbtw.right_mem_affine_span Sbtw.right_mem_affineSpan
theorem wbtw_iff_right_eq_or_left_mem_image_Ici {x y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ↔ z = y ∨ x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici]
#align wbtw_iff_right_eq_or_left_mem_image_Ici wbtw_iff_right_eq_or_left_mem_image_Ici
theorem Wbtw.left_mem_image_Ici_of_right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : z ≠ y) :
x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) :=
h.symm.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne hne
#align wbtw.left_mem_image_Ici_of_right_ne Wbtw.left_mem_image_Ici_of_right_ne
theorem Wbtw.left_mem_affineSpan_of_right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : z ≠ y) :
x ∈ line[R, z, y] :=
h.symm.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne hne
#align wbtw.left_mem_affine_span_of_right_ne Wbtw.left_mem_affineSpan_of_right_ne
theorem sbtw_iff_right_ne_and_left_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ z ≠ y ∧ x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) := by
rw [sbtw_comm, sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align sbtw_iff_right_ne_and_left_mem_image_IoI sbtw_iff_right_ne_and_left_mem_image_Ioi
theorem Sbtw.left_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) :=
h.symm.right_mem_image_Ioi
#align sbtw.left_mem_image_Ioi Sbtw.left_mem_image_Ioi
theorem Sbtw.left_mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ∈ line[R, z, y] :=
h.symm.right_mem_affineSpan
#align sbtw.left_mem_affine_span Sbtw.left_mem_affineSpan
theorem wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_le (x : P) (v : V) {r₁ r₂ : R} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁)
(hr₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) : Wbtw R x (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) := by
refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, ⟨div_nonneg hr₁ (hr₁.trans hr₂), div_le_one_of_le hr₂ (hr₁.trans hr₂)⟩, ?_⟩
by_cases h : r₁ = 0; · simp [h]
simp [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, ((hr₁.lt_of_ne' h).trans_le hr₂).ne.symm]
#align wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_le wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_le
theorem wbtw_or_wbtw_smul_vadd_of_nonneg (x : P) (v : V) {r₁ r₂ : R} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
Wbtw R x (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) ∨ Wbtw R x (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) := by
rcases le_total r₁ r₂ with (h | h)
· exact Or.inl (wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_le x v hr₁ h)
· exact Or.inr (wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_le x v hr₂ h)
#align wbtw_or_wbtw_smul_vadd_of_nonneg wbtw_or_wbtw_smul_vadd_of_nonneg
theorem wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_le (x : P) (v : V) {r₁ r₂ : R} (hr₁ : r₁ ≤ 0)
(hr₂ : r₂ ≤ r₁) : Wbtw R x (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) := by
convert wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_le x (-v) (Left.nonneg_neg_iff.2 hr₁)
(neg_le_neg_iff.2 hr₂) using 1 <;>
rw [neg_smul_neg]
#align wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_le wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_le
theorem wbtw_or_wbtw_smul_vadd_of_nonpos (x : P) (v : V) {r₁ r₂ : R} (hr₁ : r₁ ≤ 0) (hr₂ : r₂ ≤ 0) :
Wbtw R x (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) ∨ Wbtw R x (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) := by
rcases le_total r₁ r₂ with (h | h)
· exact Or.inr (wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_le x v hr₂ h)
· exact Or.inl (wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_le x v hr₁ h)
#align wbtw_or_wbtw_smul_vadd_of_nonpos wbtw_or_wbtw_smul_vadd_of_nonpos
theorem wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (x : P) (v : V) {r₁ r₂ : R} (hr₁ : r₁ ≤ 0)
(hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) : Wbtw R (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) x (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) := by
convert wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_le (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) v (Left.nonneg_neg_iff.2 hr₁)
(neg_le_sub_iff_le_add.2 ((le_add_iff_nonneg_left r₁).2 hr₂)) using 1 <;>
simp [sub_smul, ← add_vadd]
#align wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_nonneg wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_nonneg
theorem wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (x : P) (v : V) {r₁ r₂ : R} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁)
(hr₂ : r₂ ≤ 0) : Wbtw R (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) x (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) := by
rw [wbtw_comm]
exact wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_nonneg x v hr₂ hr₁
#align wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_nonpos wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_nonpos
theorem Wbtw.trans_left_right {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z) (h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) :
Wbtw R x y z := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩
refine
⟨(t₁ - t₂ * t₁) / (1 - t₂ * t₁),
⟨div_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 (mul_le_of_le_one_left ht₁.1 ht₂.2))
(sub_nonneg.2 (mul_le_one ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁.2)),
div_le_one_of_le (sub_le_sub_right ht₁.2 _) (sub_nonneg.2 (mul_le_one ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁.2))⟩,
?_⟩
simp only [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, ← add_vadd, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, vadd_vsub, vadd_right_cancel_iff, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_sub_div_same]
nth_rw 1 [← mul_one (t₁ - t₂ * t₁)]
rw [← mul_sub, mul_div_assoc]
by_cases h : 1 - t₂ * t₁ = 0
· rw [sub_eq_zero, eq_comm] at h
rw [h]
suffices t₁ = 1 by simp [this]
exact
eq_of_le_of_not_lt ht₁.2 fun ht₁lt =>
(mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_right ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁lt).ne h
· rw [div_self h]
ring_nf
#align wbtw.trans_left_right Wbtw.trans_left_right
theorem Wbtw.trans_right_left {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z) (h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R w x y := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_left_right h₂
#align wbtw.trans_right_left Wbtw.trans_right_left
theorem Sbtw.trans_left_right {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w y z) (h₂ : Sbtw R w x y) :
Sbtw R x y z :=
⟨h₁.wbtw.trans_left_right h₂.wbtw, h₂.right_ne, h₁.ne_right⟩
#align sbtw.trans_left_right Sbtw.trans_left_right
theorem Sbtw.trans_right_left {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w x z) (h₂ : Sbtw R x y z) :
Sbtw R w x y :=
⟨h₁.wbtw.trans_right_left h₂.wbtw, h₁.ne_left, h₂.left_ne⟩
#align sbtw.trans_right_left Sbtw.trans_right_left
theorem Wbtw.collinear {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : Collinear R ({x, y, z} : Set P) := by
rw [collinear_iff_exists_forall_eq_smul_vadd]
refine ⟨x, z -ᵥ x, ?_⟩
intro p hp
simp_rw [Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hp
rcases hp with (rfl | rfl | rfl)
· refine ⟨0, ?_⟩
simp
· rcases h with ⟨t, -, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, rfl⟩
· refine ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp
#align wbtw.collinear Wbtw.collinear
theorem Collinear.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Collinear R ({x, y, z} : Set P)) :
Wbtw R x y z ∨ Wbtw R y z x ∨ Wbtw R z x y := by
rw [collinear_iff_of_mem (Set.mem_insert _ _)] at h
rcases h with ⟨v, h⟩
simp_rw [Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at h
have hy := h y (Or.inr (Or.inl rfl))
have hz := h z (Or.inr (Or.inr rfl))
rcases hy with ⟨ty, rfl⟩
rcases hz with ⟨tz, rfl⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy ty 0 with (hy0 | rfl | hy0)
· rcases lt_trichotomy tz 0 with (hz0 | rfl | hz0)
· rw [wbtw_comm (z := x)]
rw [← or_assoc]
exact Or.inl (wbtw_or_wbtw_smul_vadd_of_nonpos _ _ hy0.le hz0.le)
· simp
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr (wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_nonpos _ _ hz0.le hy0.le))
· simp
· rcases lt_trichotomy tz 0 with (hz0 | rfl | hz0)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonpos_of_nonneg _ _ hz0.le hy0.le))
· simp
· rw [wbtw_comm (z := x)]
rw [← or_assoc]
exact Or.inl (wbtw_or_wbtw_smul_vadd_of_nonneg _ _ hy0.le hz0.le)
#align collinear.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw Collinear.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw
theorem wbtw_iff_sameRay_vsub {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ SameRay R (y -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ y) := by
refine ⟨Wbtw.sameRay_vsub, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with (h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩)
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
simp [h]
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
simp [h]
· refine
⟨r₂ / (r₁ + r₂),
⟨div_nonneg hr₂.le (add_nonneg hr₁.le hr₂.le),
div_le_one_of_le (le_add_of_nonneg_left hr₁.le) (add_nonneg hr₁.le hr₂.le)⟩,
?_⟩
have h' : z = r₂⁻¹ • r₁ • (y -ᵥ x) +ᵥ y := by simp [h, hr₂.ne']
rw [eq_comm]
simp only [lineMap_apply, h', vadd_vsub_assoc, smul_smul, ← add_smul, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq,
smul_add]
convert (one_smul R (y -ᵥ x)).symm
field_simp [(add_pos hr₁ hr₂).ne', hr₂.ne']
ring
#align wbtw_iff_same_ray_vsub wbtw_iff_sameRay_vsub
variable (R)
theorem wbtw_pointReflection (x y : P) : Wbtw R y x (pointReflection R x y) := by
refine ⟨2⁻¹, ⟨by norm_num, by norm_num⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, pointReflection_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, ← two_smul R (x -ᵥ y)]
simp
#align wbtw_point_reflection wbtw_pointReflection
theorem sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne {x y : P} (h : x ≠ y) : Sbtw R y x (pointReflection R x y) := by
refine ⟨wbtw_pointReflection _ _ _, h, ?_⟩
nth_rw 1 [← pointReflection_self R x]
exact (pointReflection_involutive R x).injective.ne h
#align sbtw_point_reflection_of_ne sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne
theorem wbtw_midpoint (x y : P) : Wbtw R x (midpoint R x y) y := by
convert wbtw_pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) x
rw [pointReflection_midpoint_left]
#align wbtw_midpoint wbtw_midpoint
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 921 | 924 | theorem sbtw_midpoint_of_ne {x y : P} (h : x ≠ y) : Sbtw R x (midpoint R x y) y := by |
have h : midpoint R x y ≠ x := by simp [h]
convert sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne R h
rw [pointReflection_midpoint_left]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulhwi Cha. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bulhwi Cha, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.Char
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.String.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Misc
import Batteries.Tactic.SeqFocus
namespace String
attribute [ext] ext
theorem lt_trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : String} : s₁ < s₂ → s₂ < s₃ → s₁ < s₃ :=
List.lt_trans' (α := Char) Nat.lt_trans
(fun h1 h2 => Nat.not_lt.2 <| Nat.le_trans (Nat.not_lt.1 h2) (Nat.not_lt.1 h1))
theorem lt_antisymm {s₁ s₂ : String} (h₁ : ¬s₁ < s₂) (h₂ : ¬s₂ < s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext <| List.lt_antisymm' (α := Char)
(fun h1 h2 => Char.le_antisymm (Nat.not_lt.1 h2) (Nat.not_lt.1 h1)) h₁ h₂
instance : Batteries.TransOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq
String.lt_irrefl String.lt_trans String.lt_antisymm
instance : Batteries.LTOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq
String.lt_irrefl String.lt_trans String.lt_antisymm
instance : Batteries.BEqOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq String.lt_irrefl
@[simp] theorem mk_length (s : List Char) : (String.mk s).length = s.length := rfl
attribute [simp] toList -- prefer `String.data` over `String.toList` in lemmas
private theorem add_csize_pos : 0 < i + csize c :=
Nat.add_pos_right _ (csize_pos c)
private theorem ne_add_csize_add_self : i ≠ n + csize c + i :=
Nat.ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left add_csize_pos)
private theorem ne_self_add_add_csize : i ≠ i + (n + csize c) :=
Nat.ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right add_csize_pos)
/-- The UTF-8 byte length of a list of characters. (This is intended for specification purposes.) -/
@[inline] def utf8Len : List Char → Nat := utf8ByteSize.go
@[simp] theorem utf8ByteSize.go_eq : utf8ByteSize.go = utf8Len := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8ByteSize_mk (cs) : utf8ByteSize ⟨cs⟩ = utf8Len cs := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_nil : utf8Len [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_cons (c cs) : utf8Len (c :: cs) = utf8Len cs + csize c := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_append (cs₁ cs₂) : utf8Len (cs₁ ++ cs₂) = utf8Len cs₁ + utf8Len cs₂ := by
induction cs₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.add_right_comm]
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_reverseAux (cs₁ cs₂) :
utf8Len (cs₁.reverseAux cs₂) = utf8Len cs₁ + utf8Len cs₂ := by
induction cs₁ generalizing cs₂ <;> simp [*, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm]
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_reverse (cs) : utf8Len cs.reverse = utf8Len cs := utf8Len_reverseAux ..
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_eq_zero : utf8Len l = 0 ↔ l = [] := by
cases l <;> simp [Nat.ne_of_gt add_csize_pos]
section
open List
theorem utf8Len_le_of_sublist : ∀ {cs₁ cs₂}, cs₁ <+ cs₂ → utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂
| _, _, .slnil => Nat.le_refl _
| _, _, .cons _ h => Nat.le_trans (utf8Len_le_of_sublist h) (Nat.le_add_right ..)
| _, _, .cons₂ _ h => Nat.add_le_add_right (utf8Len_le_of_sublist h) _
theorem utf8Len_le_of_infix (h : cs₁ <:+: cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
theorem utf8Len_le_of_suffix (h : cs₁ <:+ cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
theorem utf8Len_le_of_prefix (h : cs₁ <+: cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
end
@[simp] theorem endPos_eq (cs : List Char) : endPos ⟨cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ := rfl
namespace Pos
attribute [ext] ext
theorem lt_addChar (p : Pos) (c : Char) : p < p + c := Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (csize_pos _)
private theorem zero_ne_addChar {i : Pos} {c : Char} : 0 ≠ i + c :=
ne_of_lt add_csize_pos
/-- A string position is valid if it is equal to the UTF-8 length of an initial substring of `s`. -/
def Valid (s : String) (p : Pos) : Prop :=
∃ cs cs', cs ++ cs' = s.1 ∧ p.1 = utf8Len cs
@[simp] theorem valid_zero : Valid s 0 := ⟨[], s.1, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem valid_endPos : Valid s (endPos s) := ⟨s.1, [], by simp, rfl⟩
theorem Valid.mk (cs cs' : List Char) : Valid ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ := ⟨cs, cs', rfl, rfl⟩
theorem Valid.le_endPos : ∀ {s p}, Valid s p → p ≤ endPos s
| ⟨_⟩, ⟨_⟩, ⟨cs, cs', rfl, rfl⟩ => by simp [Nat.le_add_right]
end Pos
theorem endPos_eq_zero : ∀ (s : String), endPos s = 0 ↔ s = ""
| ⟨_⟩ => Pos.ext_iff.trans <| utf8Len_eq_zero.trans ext_iff.symm
theorem isEmpty_iff (s : String) : isEmpty s ↔ s = "" :=
(beq_iff_eq ..).trans (endPos_eq_zero _)
/--
Induction along the valid positions in a list of characters.
(This definition is intended only for specification purposes.)
-/
def utf8InductionOn {motive : List Char → Pos → Sort u}
(s : List Char) (i p : Pos)
(nil : ∀ i, motive [] i)
(eq : ∀ c cs, motive (c :: cs) p)
(ind : ∀ (c : Char) cs i, i ≠ p → motive cs (i + c) → motive (c :: cs) i) :
motive s i :=
match s with
| [] => nil i
| c::cs =>
if h : i = p then
h ▸ eq c cs
else ind c cs i h (utf8InductionOn cs (i + c) p nil eq ind)
theorem utf8GetAux_add_right_cancel (s : List Char) (i p n : Nat) :
utf8GetAux s ⟨i + n⟩ ⟨p + n⟩ = utf8GetAux s ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ := by
apply utf8InductionOn s ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ (motive := fun s i =>
utf8GetAux s ⟨i.byteIdx + n⟩ ⟨p + n⟩ = utf8GetAux s i ⟨p⟩) <;>
simp [utf8GetAux]
intro c cs ⟨i⟩ h ih
simp [Pos.ext_iff, Pos.addChar_eq] at h ⊢
simp [Nat.add_right_cancel_iff, h]
rw [Nat.add_right_comm]
exact ih
theorem utf8GetAux_addChar_right_cancel (s : List Char) (i p : Pos) (c : Char) :
utf8GetAux s (i + c) (p + c) = utf8GetAux s i p := utf8GetAux_add_right_cancel ..
theorem utf8GetAux_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) {i p : Nat} (hp : i + utf8Len cs = p) :
utf8GetAux (cs ++ cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = cs'.headD default := by
match cs, cs' with
| [], [] => rfl
| [], c::cs' => simp [← hp, utf8GetAux]
| c::cs, cs' =>
simp [utf8GetAux, -List.headD_eq_head?]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc => simp [← hp, Pos.ext_iff]; exact ne_self_add_add_csize
refine utf8GetAux_of_valid cs cs' ?_
simpa [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm] using hp
theorem get_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) : get ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = cs'.headD default :=
utf8GetAux_of_valid _ _ (Nat.zero_add _)
theorem get_cons_addChar (c : Char) (cs : List Char) (i : Pos) :
get ⟨c :: cs⟩ (i + c) = get ⟨cs⟩ i := by
simp [get, utf8GetAux, Pos.zero_ne_addChar, utf8GetAux_addChar_right_cancel]
theorem utf8GetAux?_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) {i p : Nat} (hp : i + utf8Len cs = p) :
utf8GetAux? (cs ++ cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = cs'.head? := by
match cs, cs' with
| [], [] => rfl
| [], c::cs' => simp [← hp, utf8GetAux?]
| c::cs, cs' =>
simp [utf8GetAux?]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc => simp [← hp, Pos.ext_iff]; exact ne_self_add_add_csize
refine utf8GetAux?_of_valid cs cs' ?_
simpa [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm] using hp
theorem get?_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) : get? ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = cs'.head? :=
utf8GetAux?_of_valid _ _ (Nat.zero_add _)
theorem utf8SetAux_of_valid (c' : Char) (cs cs' : List Char) {i p : Nat} (hp : i + utf8Len cs = p) :
utf8SetAux c' (cs ++ cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = cs ++ cs'.modifyHead fun _ => c' := by
match cs, cs' with
| [], [] => rfl
| [], c::cs' => simp [← hp, utf8SetAux]
| c::cs, cs' =>
simp [utf8SetAux]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc => simp [← hp, Pos.ext_iff]; exact ne_self_add_add_csize
refine congrArg (c::·) (utf8SetAux_of_valid c' cs cs' ?_)
simpa [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm] using hp
theorem set_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) (c' : Char) :
set ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ c' = ⟨cs ++ cs'.modifyHead fun _ => c'⟩ :=
ext (utf8SetAux_of_valid _ _ _ (Nat.zero_add _))
theorem modify_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) :
modify ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ f = ⟨cs ++ cs'.modifyHead f⟩ := by
rw [modify, set_of_valid, get_of_valid]; cases cs' <;> rfl
theorem next_of_valid' (cs cs' : List Char) :
next ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs + csize (cs'.headD default)⟩ := by
simp only [next, get_of_valid]; rfl
theorem next_of_valid (cs : List Char) (c : Char) (cs' : List Char) :
next ⟨cs ++ c :: cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs + csize c⟩ := next_of_valid' ..
@[simp] theorem atEnd_iff (s : String) (p : Pos) : atEnd s p ↔ s.endPos ≤ p :=
decide_eq_true_iff _
theorem valid_next {p : Pos} (h : p.Valid s) (h₂ : p < s.endPos) : (next s p).Valid s := by
match s, p, h with
| ⟨_⟩, ⟨_⟩, ⟨cs, [], rfl, rfl⟩ => simp at h₂
| ⟨_⟩, ⟨_⟩, ⟨cs, c::cs', rfl, rfl⟩ =>
rw [utf8ByteSize.go_eq, next_of_valid]
simpa using Pos.Valid.mk (cs ++ [c]) cs'
theorem utf8PrevAux_of_valid {cs cs' : List Char} {c : Char} {i p : Nat}
(hp : i + (utf8Len cs + csize c) = p) :
utf8PrevAux (cs ++ c :: cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = ⟨i + utf8Len cs⟩ := by
match cs with
| [] => simp [utf8PrevAux, ← hp, Pos.addChar_eq]
| c'::cs =>
simp [utf8PrevAux, Pos.addChar_eq, ← hp]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc =>
simp [Pos.ext_iff]; rw [Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.add_left_comm]; apply ne_add_csize_add_self
refine (utf8PrevAux_of_valid (by simp [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm])).trans ?_
simp [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
theorem prev_of_valid (cs : List Char) (c : Char) (cs' : List Char) :
prev ⟨cs ++ c :: cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs + csize c⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ := by
simp [prev]; refine (if_neg (Pos.ne_of_gt add_csize_pos)).trans ?_
rw [utf8PrevAux_of_valid] <;> simp
theorem prev_of_valid' (cs cs' : List Char) :
prev ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs.dropLast⟩ := by
match cs, cs.eq_nil_or_concat with
| _, .inl rfl => rfl
| _, .inr ⟨cs, c, rfl⟩ => simp [prev_of_valid]
theorem front_eq (s : String) : front s = s.1.headD default := by
unfold front; exact get_of_valid [] s.1
theorem back_eq (s : String) : back s = s.1.getLastD default := by
match s, s.1.eq_nil_or_concat with
| ⟨_⟩, .inl rfl => rfl
| ⟨_⟩, .inr ⟨cs, c, rfl⟩ => simp [back, prev_of_valid, get_of_valid]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/String/Lemmas.lean | 247 | 250 | theorem atEnd_of_valid (cs : List Char) (cs' : List Char) :
atEnd ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ ↔ cs' = [] := by |
rw [atEnd_iff]
cases cs' <;> simp [Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right add_csize_pos]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
#align_import algebra.cubic_discriminant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"930133160e24036d5242039fe4972407cd4f1222"
/-!
# Cubics and discriminants
This file defines cubic polynomials over a semiring and their discriminants over a splitting field.
## Main definitions
* `Cubic`: the structure representing a cubic polynomial.
* `Cubic.disc`: the discriminant of a cubic polynomial.
## Main statements
* `Cubic.disc_ne_zero_iff_roots_nodup`: the cubic discriminant is not equal to zero if and only if
the cubic has no duplicate roots.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_equation
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant
## Tags
cubic, discriminant, polynomial, root
-/
noncomputable section
/-- The structure representing a cubic polynomial. -/
@[ext]
structure Cubic (R : Type*) where
(a b c d : R)
#align cubic Cubic
namespace Cubic
open Cubic Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable {R S F K : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default, default⟩⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
section Basic
variable {P Q : Cubic R} {a b c d a' b' c' d' : R} [Semiring R]
/-- Convert a cubic polynomial to a polynomial. -/
def toPoly (P : Cubic R) : R[X] :=
C P.a * X ^ 3 + C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d
#align cubic.to_poly Cubic.toPoly
theorem C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {w x y z : S} :
C w * (X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨w, w * -(x + y + z), w * (x * y + x * z + y * z), w * -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
simp only [toPoly, C_neg, C_add, C_mul]
ring1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cubic.C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq Cubic.C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq
theorem prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {x y z : S} :
(X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨1, -(x + y + z), x * y + x * z + y * z, -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
rw [← one_mul <| X - C x, ← C_1, C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq, one_mul, one_mul, one_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq Cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq
/-! ### Coefficients -/
section Coeff
private theorem coeffs : (∀ n > 3, P.toPoly.coeff n = 0) ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a ∧
P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d := by
simp only [toPoly, coeff_add, coeff_C, coeff_C_mul_X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
intro n hn
repeat' rw [if_neg]
any_goals linarith only [hn]
repeat' rw [zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 3 < n) : P.toPoly.coeff n = 0 :=
coeffs.1 n hn
#align cubic.coeff_eq_zero Cubic.coeff_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_a : P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a :=
coeffs.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_a Cubic.coeff_eq_a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_b : P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b :=
coeffs.2.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_b Cubic.coeff_eq_b
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_c : P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c :=
coeffs.2.2.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_c Cubic.coeff_eq_c
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_d : P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d :=
coeffs.2.2.2.2
#align cubic.coeff_eq_d Cubic.coeff_eq_d
theorem a_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.a = Q.a := by rw [← coeff_eq_a, h, coeff_eq_a]
#align cubic.a_of_eq Cubic.a_of_eq
theorem b_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.b = Q.b := by rw [← coeff_eq_b, h, coeff_eq_b]
#align cubic.b_of_eq Cubic.b_of_eq
theorem c_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.c = Q.c := by rw [← coeff_eq_c, h, coeff_eq_c]
#align cubic.c_of_eq Cubic.c_of_eq
theorem d_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.d = Q.d := by rw [← coeff_eq_d, h, coeff_eq_d]
#align cubic.d_of_eq Cubic.d_of_eq
theorem toPoly_injective (P Q : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly ↔ P = Q :=
⟨fun h ↦ Cubic.ext P Q (a_of_eq h) (b_of_eq h) (c_of_eq h) (d_of_eq h), congr_arg toPoly⟩
#align cubic.to_poly_injective Cubic.toPoly_injective
theorem of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [toPoly, ha, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_a_eq_zero Cubic.of_a_eq_zero
theorem of_a_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩ = C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d :=
of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.of_a_eq_zero'
theorem of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, hb, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_b_eq_zero Cubic.of_b_eq_zero
theorem of_b_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩ = C c * X + C d :=
of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_b_eq_zero' Cubic.of_b_eq_zero'
theorem of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.d := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, hc, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_c_eq_zero Cubic.of_c_eq_zero
theorem of_c_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩ = C d :=
of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.of_c_eq_zero'
theorem of_d_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 0) :
P.toPoly = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, hd, C_0]
#align cubic.of_d_eq_zero Cubic.of_d_eq_zero
theorem of_d_eq_zero' : (⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩ : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_d_eq_zero' Cubic.of_d_eq_zero'
theorem zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero'
#align cubic.zero Cubic.zero
theorem toPoly_eq_zero_iff (P : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = 0 ↔ P = 0 := by
rw [← zero, toPoly_injective]
#align cubic.to_poly_eq_zero_iff Cubic.toPoly_eq_zero_iff
private theorem ne_zero (h0 : P.a ≠ 0 ∨ P.b ≠ 0 ∨ P.c ≠ 0 ∨ P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h0
rw [(toPoly_eq_zero_iff P).mp h0]
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp ne_zero).1 ha
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).1 hb
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero (hc : P.c ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).2).1 hc
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero (hd : P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).2).2 hd
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.a :=
leadingCoeff_cubic ha
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = a :=
leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.b := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, leadingCoeff_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = b :=
leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.c := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, leadingCoeff_linear hc]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = c :=
leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) :
P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.d := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, leadingCoeff_C]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_eq_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero
-- @[simp] -- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).leadingCoeff = d :=
leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero'
theorem monic_of_a_eq_one (ha : P.a = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero (ha ▸ one_ne_zero), ha]
#align cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one
theorem monic_of_a_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨1, b, c, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_a_eq_one rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_b_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero ha (hb ▸ one_ne_zero), hb]
#align cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one
theorem monic_of_b_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 1, c, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_b_eq_one rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_c_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero ha hb (hc ▸ one_ne_zero), hc]
#align cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one
theorem monic_of_c_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 1, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_c_eq_one rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_d_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 1) :
P.toPoly.Monic := by
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, hd]
#align cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one
theorem monic_of_d_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, 1⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_d_eq_one rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one'
end Coeff
/-! ### Degrees -/
section Degree
/-- The equivalence between cubic polynomials and polynomials of degree at most three. -/
@[simps]
def equiv : Cubic R ≃ { p : R[X] // p.degree ≤ 3 } where
toFun P := ⟨P.toPoly, degree_cubic_le⟩
invFun f := ⟨coeff f 3, coeff f 2, coeff f 1, coeff f 0⟩
left_inv P := by ext <;> simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, coeffs]
right_inv f := by
-- Porting note: Added `simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] <;> ring_nf`
-- There's probably a better way to do this.
ext (_ | _ | _ | _ | n) <;> simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] <;> ring_nf
<;> try simp only [coeffs]
have h3 : 3 < 4 + n := by linarith only
rw [coeff_eq_zero h3,
(degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) 3).mp f.2 _ <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr (by exact h3)]
#align cubic.equiv Cubic.equiv
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 3 :=
degree_cubic ha
#align cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).degree = 3 :=
degree_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 2 := by
simpa only [of_a_eq_zero ha] using degree_quadratic_le
#align cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_a_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).degree ≤ 2 :=
degree_of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 2 := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, degree_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).degree = 2 :=
degree_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [of_b_eq_zero ha hb] using degree_linear_le
#align cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_b_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).degree ≤ 1 :=
degree_of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 1 := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, degree_linear hc]
#align cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).degree = 1 :=
degree_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
#align cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc] using degree_C_le
#align cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).degree ≤ 0 :=
degree_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.degree = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, degree_C hd]
#align cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_ne_zero' (hd : d ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).degree = 0 :=
degree_of_d_ne_zero rfl rfl rfl hd
#align cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 0) :
P.toPoly.degree = ⊥ := by
rw [of_d_eq_zero ha hb hc hd, degree_zero]
#align cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero
-- @[simp] -- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem degree_of_d_eq_zero' : (⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩ : Cubic R).toPoly.degree = ⊥ :=
degree_of_d_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly.degree = ⊥ :=
degree_of_d_eq_zero'
#align cubic.degree_of_zero Cubic.degree_of_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree = 3 :=
natDegree_cubic ha
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).natDegree = 3 :=
natDegree_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_a_ne_zero'
theorem natDegree_of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree ≤ 2 := by
simpa only [of_a_eq_zero ha] using natDegree_quadratic_le
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_eq_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_a_eq_zero
theorem natDegree_of_a_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).natDegree ≤ 2 :=
natDegree_of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_a_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree = 2 := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, natDegree_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).natDegree = 2 :=
natDegree_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero'
| Mathlib/Algebra/CubicDiscriminant.lean | 409 | 410 | theorem natDegree_of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree ≤ 1 := by |
simpa only [of_b_eq_zero ha hb] using natDegree_linear_le
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Unitization
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.StarSubalgebra
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.ContinuousMapZero
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Weierstrass
#align_import topology.continuous_function.stone_weierstrass from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"16e59248c0ebafabd5d071b1cd41743eb8698ffb"
/-!
# The Stone-Weierstrass theorem
If a subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, where `X` is a compact topological space,
separates points, then it is dense.
We argue as follows.
* In any subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, if `f ∈ A`, then `abs f ∈ A.topologicalClosure`.
This follows from the Weierstrass approximation theorem on `[-‖f‖, ‖f‖]` by
approximating `abs` uniformly thereon by polynomials.
* This ensures that `A.topologicalClosure` is actually a sublattice:
if it contains `f` and `g`, then it contains the pointwise supremum `f ⊔ g`
and the pointwise infimum `f ⊓ g`.
* Any nonempty sublattice `L` of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points is dense,
by a nice argument approximating a given `f` above and below using separating functions.
For each `x y : X`, we pick a function `g x y ∈ L` so `g x y x = f x` and `g x y y = f y`.
By continuity these functions remain close to `f` on small patches around `x` and `y`.
We use compactness to identify a certain finitely indexed infimum of finitely indexed supremums
which is then close to `f` everywhere, obtaining the desired approximation.
* Finally we put these pieces together. `L = A.topologicalClosure` is a nonempty sublattice
which separates points since `A` does, and so is dense (in fact equal to `⊤`).
We then prove the complex version for star subalgebras `A`, by separately approximating
the real and imaginary parts using the real subalgebra of real-valued functions in `A`
(which still separates points, by taking the norm-square of a separating function).
## Future work
Extend to cover the case of subalgebras of the continuous functions vanishing at infinity,
on non-compact spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace ContinuousMap
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [CompactSpace X]
open scoped Polynomial
/-- Turn a function `f : C(X, ℝ)` into a continuous map into `Set.Icc (-‖f‖) (‖f‖)`,
thereby explicitly attaching bounds.
-/
def attachBound (f : C(X, ℝ)) : C(X, Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖) where
toFun x := ⟨f x, ⟨neg_norm_le_apply f x, apply_le_norm f x⟩⟩
#align continuous_map.attach_bound ContinuousMap.attachBound
@[simp]
theorem attachBound_apply_coe (f : C(X, ℝ)) (x : X) : ((attachBound f) x : ℝ) = f x :=
rfl
#align continuous_map.attach_bound_apply_coe ContinuousMap.attachBound_apply_coe
theorem polynomial_comp_attachBound (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) (g : ℝ[X]) :
(g.toContinuousMapOn (Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖)).comp (f : C(X, ℝ)).attachBound =
Polynomial.aeval f g := by
ext
simp only [ContinuousMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, ContinuousMap.attachBound_apply_coe,
Polynomial.toContinuousMapOn_apply, Polynomial.aeval_subalgebra_coe,
Polynomial.aeval_continuousMap_apply, Polynomial.toContinuousMap_apply]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [ContinuousMap.attachBound_apply_coe]
#align continuous_map.polynomial_comp_attach_bound ContinuousMap.polynomial_comp_attachBound
/-- Given a continuous function `f` in a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)`, postcomposing by a polynomial
gives another function in `A`.
This lemma proves something slightly more subtle than this:
we take `f`, and think of it as a function into the restricted target `Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖)`,
and then postcompose with a polynomial function on that interval.
This is in fact the same situation as above, and so also gives a function in `A`.
-/
theorem polynomial_comp_attachBound_mem (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) (g : ℝ[X]) :
(g.toContinuousMapOn (Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖)).comp (f : C(X, ℝ)).attachBound ∈ A := by
rw [polynomial_comp_attachBound]
apply SetLike.coe_mem
#align continuous_map.polynomial_comp_attach_bound_mem ContinuousMap.polynomial_comp_attachBound_mem
theorem comp_attachBound_mem_closure (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A)
(p : C(Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖, ℝ)) : p.comp (attachBound (f : C(X, ℝ))) ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
-- `p` itself is in the closure of polynomials, by the Weierstrass theorem,
have mem_closure : p ∈ (polynomialFunctions (Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖)).topologicalClosure :=
continuousMap_mem_polynomialFunctions_closure _ _ p
-- and so there are polynomials arbitrarily close.
have frequently_mem_polynomials := mem_closure_iff_frequently.mp mem_closure
-- To prove `p.comp (attachBound f)` is in the closure of `A`,
-- we show there are elements of `A` arbitrarily close.
apply mem_closure_iff_frequently.mpr
-- To show that, we pull back the polynomials close to `p`,
refine
((compRightContinuousMap ℝ (attachBound (f : C(X, ℝ)))).continuousAt
p).tendsto.frequently_map
_ ?_ frequently_mem_polynomials
-- but need to show that those pullbacks are actually in `A`.
rintro _ ⟨g, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, compRightContinuousMap_apply,
Polynomial.toContinuousMapOnAlgHom_apply]
apply polynomial_comp_attachBound_mem
#align continuous_map.comp_attach_bound_mem_closure ContinuousMap.comp_attachBound_mem_closure
theorem abs_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) :
|(f : C(X, ℝ))| ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
let f' := attachBound (f : C(X, ℝ))
let abs : C(Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖, ℝ) := { toFun := fun x : Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖ => |(x : ℝ)| }
change abs.comp f' ∈ A.topologicalClosure
apply comp_attachBound_mem_closure
#align continuous_map.abs_mem_subalgebra_closure ContinuousMap.abs_mem_subalgebra_closure
theorem inf_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f g : A) :
(f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊓ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
rw [inf_eq_half_smul_add_sub_abs_sub' ℝ]
refine
A.topologicalClosure.smul_mem
(A.topologicalClosure.sub_mem
(A.topologicalClosure.add_mem (A.le_topologicalClosure f.property)
(A.le_topologicalClosure g.property))
?_)
_
exact mod_cast abs_mem_subalgebra_closure A _
#align continuous_map.inf_mem_subalgebra_closure ContinuousMap.inf_mem_subalgebra_closure
theorem inf_mem_closed_subalgebra (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (h : IsClosed (A : Set C(X, ℝ)))
(f g : A) : (f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊓ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A := by
convert inf_mem_subalgebra_closure A f g
apply SetLike.ext'
symm
erw [closure_eq_iff_isClosed]
exact h
#align continuous_map.inf_mem_closed_subalgebra ContinuousMap.inf_mem_closed_subalgebra
theorem sup_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f g : A) :
(f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊔ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
rw [sup_eq_half_smul_add_add_abs_sub' ℝ]
refine
A.topologicalClosure.smul_mem
(A.topologicalClosure.add_mem
(A.topologicalClosure.add_mem (A.le_topologicalClosure f.property)
(A.le_topologicalClosure g.property))
?_)
_
exact mod_cast abs_mem_subalgebra_closure A _
#align continuous_map.sup_mem_subalgebra_closure ContinuousMap.sup_mem_subalgebra_closure
theorem sup_mem_closed_subalgebra (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (h : IsClosed (A : Set C(X, ℝ)))
(f g : A) : (f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊔ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A := by
convert sup_mem_subalgebra_closure A f g
apply SetLike.ext'
symm
erw [closure_eq_iff_isClosed]
exact h
#align continuous_map.sup_mem_closed_subalgebra ContinuousMap.sup_mem_closed_subalgebra
open scoped Topology
-- Here's the fun part of Stone-Weierstrass!
theorem sublattice_closure_eq_top (L : Set C(X, ℝ)) (nA : L.Nonempty)
(inf_mem : ∀ᵉ (f ∈ L) (g ∈ L), f ⊓ g ∈ L)
(sup_mem : ∀ᵉ (f ∈ L) (g ∈ L), f ⊔ g ∈ L) (sep : L.SeparatesPointsStrongly) :
closure L = ⊤ := by
-- We start by boiling down to a statement about close approximation.
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro f -
refine
Filter.Frequently.mem_closure
((Filter.HasBasis.frequently_iff Metric.nhds_basis_ball).mpr fun ε pos => ?_)
simp only [exists_prop, Metric.mem_ball]
-- It will be helpful to assume `X` is nonempty later,
-- so we get that out of the way here.
by_cases nX : Nonempty X
swap
· exact ⟨nA.some, (dist_lt_iff pos).mpr fun x => False.elim (nX ⟨x⟩), nA.choose_spec⟩
/-
The strategy now is to pick a family of continuous functions `g x y` in `A`
with the property that `g x y x = f x` and `g x y y = f y`
(this is immediate from `h : SeparatesPointsStrongly`)
then use continuity to see that `g x y` is close to `f` near both `x` and `y`,
and finally using compactness to produce the desired function `h`
as a maximum over finitely many `x` of a minimum over finitely many `y` of the `g x y`.
-/
dsimp only [Set.SeparatesPointsStrongly] at sep
choose g hg w₁ w₂ using sep f
-- For each `x y`, we define `U x y` to be `{z | f z - ε < g x y z}`,
-- and observe this is a neighbourhood of `y`.
let U : X → X → Set X := fun x y => {z | f z - ε < g x y z}
have U_nhd_y : ∀ x y, U x y ∈ 𝓝 y := by
intro x y
refine IsOpen.mem_nhds ?_ ?_
· apply isOpen_lt <;> continuity
· rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, w₂]
exact sub_lt_self _ pos
-- Fixing `x` for a moment, we have a family of functions `fun y ↦ g x y`
-- which on different patches (the `U x y`) are greater than `f z - ε`.
-- Taking the supremum of these functions
-- indexed by a finite collection of patches which cover `X`
-- will give us an element of `A` that is globally greater than `f z - ε`
-- and still equal to `f x` at `x`.
-- Since `X` is compact, for every `x` there is some finset `ys t`
-- so the union of the `U x y` for `y ∈ ys x` still covers everything.
let ys : X → Finset X := fun x => (CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover (U x) (U_nhd_y x)).choose
let ys_w : ∀ x, ⋃ y ∈ ys x, U x y = ⊤ := fun x =>
(CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover (U x) (U_nhd_y x)).choose_spec
have ys_nonempty : ∀ x, (ys x).Nonempty := fun x =>
Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty _ _ nX (ys_w x)
-- Thus for each `x` we have the desired `h x : A` so `f z - ε < h x z` everywhere
-- and `h x x = f x`.
let h : X → L := fun x =>
⟨(ys x).sup' (ys_nonempty x) fun y => (g x y : C(X, ℝ)),
Finset.sup'_mem _ sup_mem _ _ _ fun y _ => hg x y⟩
have lt_h : ∀ x z, f z - ε < (h x : X → ℝ) z := by
intro x z
obtain ⟨y, ym, zm⟩ := Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top _ _ (ys_w x) z
dsimp
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, coe_sup', Finset.sup'_apply, Finset.lt_sup'_iff]
exact ⟨y, ym, zm⟩
have h_eq : ∀ x, (h x : X → ℝ) x = f x := by intro x; simp [w₁]
-- For each `x`, we define `W x` to be `{z | h x z < f z + ε}`,
let W : X → Set X := fun x => {z | (h x : X → ℝ) z < f z + ε}
-- This is still a neighbourhood of `x`.
have W_nhd : ∀ x, W x ∈ 𝓝 x := by
intro x
refine IsOpen.mem_nhds ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: mathlib3 `continuity` found `continuous_set_coe`
apply isOpen_lt (continuous_set_coe _ _)
continuity
· dsimp only [W, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [h_eq]
exact lt_add_of_pos_right _ pos
-- Since `X` is compact, there is some finset `ys t`
-- so the union of the `W x` for `x ∈ xs` still covers everything.
let xs : Finset X := (CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover W W_nhd).choose
let xs_w : ⋃ x ∈ xs, W x = ⊤ := (CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover W W_nhd).choose_spec
have xs_nonempty : xs.Nonempty := Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty _ _ nX xs_w
-- Finally our candidate function is the infimum over `x ∈ xs` of the `h x`.
-- This function is then globally less than `f z + ε`.
let k : (L : Type _) :=
⟨xs.inf' xs_nonempty fun x => (h x : C(X, ℝ)),
Finset.inf'_mem _ inf_mem _ _ _ fun x _ => (h x).2⟩
refine ⟨k.1, ?_, k.2⟩
-- We just need to verify the bound, which we do pointwise.
rw [dist_lt_iff pos]
intro z
-- We rewrite into this particular form,
-- so that simp lemmas about inequalities involving `Finset.inf'` can fire.
rw [show ∀ a b ε : ℝ, dist a b < ε ↔ a < b + ε ∧ b - ε < a by
intros; simp only [← Metric.mem_ball, Real.ball_eq_Ioo, Set.mem_Ioo, and_comm]]
fconstructor
· dsimp
simp only [Finset.inf'_lt_iff, ContinuousMap.inf'_apply]
exact Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top _ _ xs_w z
· dsimp
simp only [Finset.lt_inf'_iff, ContinuousMap.inf'_apply]
rintro x -
apply lt_h
#align continuous_map.sublattice_closure_eq_top ContinuousMap.sublattice_closure_eq_top
/-- The **Stone-Weierstrass Approximation Theorem**,
that a subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, where `X` is a compact topological space,
is dense if it separates points.
-/
theorem subalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ))
(w : A.SeparatesPoints) : A.topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
-- The closure of `A` is closed under taking `sup` and `inf`,
-- and separates points strongly (since `A` does),
-- so we can apply `sublattice_closure_eq_top`.
apply SetLike.ext'
let L := A.topologicalClosure
have n : Set.Nonempty (L : Set C(X, ℝ)) := ⟨(1 : C(X, ℝ)), A.le_topologicalClosure A.one_mem⟩
convert
sublattice_closure_eq_top (L : Set C(X, ℝ)) n
(fun f fm g gm => inf_mem_closed_subalgebra L A.isClosed_topologicalClosure ⟨f, fm⟩ ⟨g, gm⟩)
(fun f fm g gm => sup_mem_closed_subalgebra L A.isClosed_topologicalClosure ⟨f, fm⟩ ⟨g, gm⟩)
(Subalgebra.SeparatesPoints.strongly
(Subalgebra.separatesPoints_monotone A.le_topologicalClosure w))
simp [L]
#align continuous_map.subalgebra_topological_closure_eq_top_of_separates_points ContinuousMap.subalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints
/-- An alternative statement of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem.
If `A` is a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points (and `X` is compact),
every real-valued continuous function on `X` is a uniform limit of elements of `A`.
-/
theorem continuousMap_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separatesPoints (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ))
(w : A.SeparatesPoints) (f : C(X, ℝ)) : f ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
rw [subalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints A w]
simp
#align continuous_map.continuous_map_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separates_points ContinuousMap.continuousMap_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separatesPoints
/-- An alternative statement of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem,
for those who like their epsilons.
If `A` is a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points (and `X` is compact),
every real-valued continuous function on `X` is within any `ε > 0` of some element of `A`.
-/
theorem exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuousMap_of_separatesPoints (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ))
(w : A.SeparatesPoints) (f : C(X, ℝ)) (ε : ℝ) (pos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : A, ‖(g : C(X, ℝ)) - f‖ < ε := by
have w :=
mem_closure_iff_frequently.mp (continuousMap_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separatesPoints A w f)
rw [Metric.nhds_basis_ball.frequently_iff] at w
obtain ⟨g, H, m⟩ := w ε pos
rw [Metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at H
exact ⟨⟨g, m⟩, H⟩
#align continuous_map.exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuous_map_of_separates_points ContinuousMap.exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuousMap_of_separatesPoints
/-- An alternative statement of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem,
for those who like their epsilons and don't like bundled continuous functions.
If `A` is a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points (and `X` is compact),
every real-valued continuous function on `X` is within any `ε > 0` of some element of `A`.
-/
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousFunction/StoneWeierstrass.lean | 326 | 331 | theorem exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuous_of_separatesPoints (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ))
(w : A.SeparatesPoints) (f : X → ℝ) (c : Continuous f) (ε : ℝ) (pos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : A, ∀ x, ‖(g : X → ℝ) x - f x‖ < ε := by |
obtain ⟨g, b⟩ := exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuousMap_of_separatesPoints A w ⟨f, c⟩ ε pos
use g
rwa [norm_lt_iff _ pos] at b
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Defs
#align_import ring_theory.finiteness from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c813ed7de0f5115f956239124e9b30f3a621966f"
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Submodule.FG`, `Ideal.FG`
These express that some object is finitely generated as *submodule* over some base ring.
- `Module.Finite`, `RingHom.Finite`, `AlgHom.Finite`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as module* over some base ring.
## Main results
* `exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul` is Nakayama's lemma, in the following form:
if N is a finitely generated submodule of an ambient R-module M and I is an ideal of R
such that N ⊆ IN, then there exists r ∈ 1 + I such that rN = 0.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
namespace Submodule
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
open Set
/-- A submodule of `M` is finitely generated if it is the span of a finite subset of `M`. -/
def FG (N : Submodule R M) : Prop :=
∃ S : Finset M, Submodule.span R ↑S = N
#align submodule.fg Submodule.FG
theorem fg_def {N : Submodule R M} : N.FG ↔ ∃ S : Set M, S.Finite ∧ span R S = N :=
⟨fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨_, Finset.finite_toSet t, h⟩, by
rintro ⟨t', h, rfl⟩
rcases Finite.exists_finset_coe h with ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, rfl⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_def Submodule.fg_def
theorem fg_iff_addSubmonoid_fg (P : Submodule ℕ M) : P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubmonoid.FG :=
⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by simpa [← span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure] using hS⟩, fun ⟨S, hS⟩ =>
⟨S, by simpa [← span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure] using hS⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_iff_add_submonoid_fg Submodule.fg_iff_addSubmonoid_fg
theorem fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] (P : Submodule ℤ G) :
P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubgroup.FG :=
⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS⟩, fun ⟨S, hS⟩ =>
⟨S, by simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg Submodule.fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Finiteness.lean | 69 | 77 | theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by |
rw [fg_def]
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
obtain ⟨n, f, rfl⟩ := Sfin.fin_embedding
exact ⟨n, f, hS⟩
· rintro ⟨n, s, hs⟩
exact ⟨range s, finite_range s, hs⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Apurva Nakade. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Apurva Nakade
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Surreal.Basic
#align_import set_theory.surreal.dyadic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
/-!
# Dyadic numbers
Dyadic numbers are obtained by localizing ℤ away from 2. They are the initial object in the category
of rings with no 2-torsion.
## Dyadic surreal numbers
We construct dyadic surreal numbers using the canonical map from ℤ[2 ^ {-1}] to surreals.
As we currently do not have a ring structure on `Surreal` we construct this map explicitly. Once we
have the ring structure, this map can be constructed directly by sending `2 ^ {-1}` to `half`.
## Embeddings
The above construction gives us an abelian group embedding of ℤ into `Surreal`. The goal is to
extend this to an embedding of dyadic rationals into `Surreal` and use Cauchy sequences of dyadic
rational numbers to construct an ordered field embedding of ℝ into `Surreal`.
-/
universe u
namespace SetTheory
namespace PGame
/-- For a natural number `n`, the pre-game `powHalf (n + 1)` is recursively defined as
`{0 | powHalf n}`. These are the explicit expressions of powers of `1 / 2`. By definition, we have
`powHalf 0 = 1` and `powHalf 1 ≈ 1 / 2` and we prove later on that
`powHalf (n + 1) + powHalf (n + 1) ≈ powHalf n`. -/
def powHalf : ℕ → PGame
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => ⟨PUnit, PUnit, 0, fun _ => powHalf n⟩
#align pgame.pow_half SetTheory.PGame.powHalf
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_zero : powHalf 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_zero SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_zero
theorem powHalf_leftMoves (n) : (powHalf n).LeftMoves = PUnit := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_leftMoves
theorem powHalf_zero_rightMoves : (powHalf 0).RightMoves = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_zero_rightMoves
theorem powHalf_succ_rightMoves (n) : (powHalf (n + 1)).RightMoves = PUnit :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_rightMoves
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_moveLeft (n i) : (powHalf n).moveLeft i = 0 := by cases n <;> cases i <;> rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_move_left SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_succ_moveRight (n i) : (powHalf (n + 1)).moveRight i = powHalf n :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_move_right SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_moveRight
instance uniquePowHalfLeftMoves (n) : Unique (powHalf n).LeftMoves := by
cases n <;> exact PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_pow_half_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniquePowHalfLeftMoves
instance isEmpty_powHalf_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (powHalf 0).RightMoves :=
inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty)
#align pgame.is_empty_pow_half_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_powHalf_zero_rightMoves
instance uniquePowHalfSuccRightMoves (n) : Unique (powHalf (n + 1)).RightMoves :=
PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_pow_half_succ_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniquePowHalfSuccRightMoves
@[simp]
theorem birthday_half : birthday (powHalf 1) = 2 := by
rw [birthday_def]; simp
#align pgame.birthday_half SetTheory.PGame.birthday_half
/-- For all natural numbers `n`, the pre-games `powHalf n` are numeric. -/
theorem numeric_powHalf (n) : (powHalf n).Numeric := by
induction' n with n hn
· exact numeric_one
· constructor
· simpa using hn.moveLeft_lt default
· exact ⟨fun _ => numeric_zero, fun _ => hn⟩
#align pgame.numeric_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.numeric_powHalf
theorem powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf (n : ℕ) : powHalf (n + 1) < powHalf n :=
(numeric_powHalf (n + 1)).lt_moveRight default
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_lt_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf
theorem powHalf_succ_le_powHalf (n : ℕ) : powHalf (n + 1) ≤ powHalf n :=
(powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf n).le
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_le_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_le_powHalf
theorem powHalf_le_one (n : ℕ) : powHalf n ≤ 1 := by
induction' n with n hn
· exact le_rfl
· exact (powHalf_succ_le_powHalf n).trans hn
#align pgame.pow_half_le_one SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_le_one
theorem powHalf_succ_lt_one (n : ℕ) : powHalf (n + 1) < 1 :=
(powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf n).trans_le <| powHalf_le_one n
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_lt_one SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_lt_one
theorem powHalf_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < powHalf n := by
rw [← lf_iff_lt numeric_zero (numeric_powHalf n), zero_lf_le]; simp
#align pgame.pow_half_pos SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_pos
theorem zero_le_powHalf (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ powHalf n :=
(powHalf_pos n).le
#align pgame.zero_le_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_powHalf
theorem add_powHalf_succ_self_eq_powHalf (n) : powHalf (n + 1) + powHalf (n + 1) ≈ powHalf n := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n hn
constructor <;> rw [le_iff_forall_lf] <;> constructor
· rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> apply lf_of_lt
· calc
0 + powHalf n.succ ≈ powHalf n.succ := zero_add_equiv _
_ < powHalf n := powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf n
· calc
powHalf n.succ + 0 ≈ powHalf n.succ := add_zero_equiv _
_ < powHalf n := powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf n
· cases' n with n
· rintro ⟨⟩
rintro ⟨⟩
apply lf_of_moveRight_le
swap
· exact Sum.inl default
calc
powHalf n.succ + powHalf (n.succ + 1) ≤ powHalf n.succ + powHalf n.succ :=
add_le_add_left (powHalf_succ_le_powHalf _) _
_ ≈ powHalf n := hn _ (Nat.lt_succ_self n)
· simp only [powHalf_moveLeft, forall_const]
apply lf_of_lt
calc
0 ≈ 0 + 0 := Equiv.symm (add_zero_equiv 0)
_ ≤ powHalf n.succ + 0 := add_le_add_right (zero_le_powHalf _) _
_ < powHalf n.succ + powHalf n.succ := add_lt_add_left (powHalf_pos _) _
· rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> apply lf_of_lt
· calc
powHalf n ≈ powHalf n + 0 := Equiv.symm (add_zero_equiv _)
_ < powHalf n + powHalf n.succ := add_lt_add_left (powHalf_pos _) _
· calc
powHalf n ≈ 0 + powHalf n := Equiv.symm (zero_add_equiv _)
_ < powHalf n.succ + powHalf n := add_lt_add_right (powHalf_pos _) _
#align pgame.add_pow_half_succ_self_eq_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.add_powHalf_succ_self_eq_powHalf
theorem half_add_half_equiv_one : powHalf 1 + powHalf 1 ≈ 1 :=
add_powHalf_succ_self_eq_powHalf 0
#align pgame.half_add_half_equiv_one SetTheory.PGame.half_add_half_equiv_one
end PGame
end SetTheory
namespace Surreal
open SetTheory PGame
/-- Powers of the surreal number `half`. -/
def powHalf (n : ℕ) : Surreal :=
⟦⟨PGame.powHalf n, PGame.numeric_powHalf n⟩⟧
#align surreal.pow_half Surreal.powHalf
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_zero : powHalf 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align surreal.pow_half_zero Surreal.powHalf_zero
@[simp]
theorem double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf (n : ℕ) : 2 • powHalf n.succ = powHalf n := by
rw [two_nsmul]; exact Quotient.sound (PGame.add_powHalf_succ_self_eq_powHalf n)
#align surreal.double_pow_half_succ_eq_pow_half Surreal.double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_pow_two_powHalf (n : ℕ) : 2 ^ n • powHalf n = 1 := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, pow_zero, powHalf_zero, one_smul]
· rw [← hn, ← double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf n, smul_smul (2 ^ n) 2 (powHalf n.succ), mul_comm,
pow_succ']
#align surreal.nsmul_pow_two_pow_half Surreal.nsmul_pow_two_powHalf
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_pow_two_powHalf' (n k : ℕ) : 2 ^ n • powHalf (n + k) = powHalf k := by
induction' k with k hk
· simp only [add_zero, Surreal.nsmul_pow_two_powHalf, Nat.zero_eq, eq_self_iff_true,
Surreal.powHalf_zero]
· rw [← double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf (n + k), ← double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf k,
smul_algebra_smul_comm] at hk
rwa [← zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff' two_ne_zero]
#align surreal.nsmul_pow_two_pow_half' Surreal.nsmul_pow_two_powHalf'
theorem zsmul_pow_two_powHalf (m : ℤ) (n k : ℕ) :
(m * 2 ^ n) • powHalf (n + k) = m • powHalf k := by
rw [mul_zsmul]
congr
norm_cast
exact nsmul_pow_two_powHalf' n k
#align surreal.zsmul_pow_two_pow_half Surreal.zsmul_pow_two_powHalf
theorem dyadic_aux {m₁ m₂ : ℤ} {y₁ y₂ : ℕ} (h₂ : m₁ * 2 ^ y₁ = m₂ * 2 ^ y₂) :
m₁ • powHalf y₂ = m₂ • powHalf y₁ := by
revert m₁ m₂
wlog h : y₁ ≤ y₂
· intro m₁ m₂ aux; exact (this (le_of_not_le h) aux.symm).symm
intro m₁ m₂ h₂
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp h
rw [add_comm, pow_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_eq_mul_right_iff] at h₂
cases' h₂ with h₂ h₂
· rw [h₂, add_comm, zsmul_pow_two_powHalf m₂ c y₁]
· have := Nat.one_le_pow y₁ 2 Nat.succ_pos'
norm_cast at h₂; omega
#align surreal.dyadic_aux Surreal.dyadic_aux
/-- The additive monoid morphism `dyadicMap` sends ⟦⟨m, 2^n⟩⟧ to m • half ^ n. -/
def dyadicMap : Localization.Away (2 : ℤ) →+ Surreal where
toFun x :=
(Localization.liftOn x fun x y => x • powHalf (Submonoid.log y)) <| by
intro m₁ m₂ n₁ n₂ h₁
obtain ⟨⟨n₃, y₃, hn₃⟩, h₂⟩ := Localization.r_iff_exists.mp h₁
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, mul_eq_mul_left_iff] at h₂
cases h₂
· obtain ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ := n₁.prop
obtain ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ := n₂.prop
simp only at ha₁ ha₂ ⊢
have hn₁ : n₁ = Submonoid.pow 2 a₁ := Subtype.ext ha₁.symm
have hn₂ : n₂ = Submonoid.pow 2 a₂ := Subtype.ext ha₂.symm
have h₂ : 1 < (2 : ℤ).natAbs := one_lt_two
rw [hn₁, hn₂, Submonoid.log_pow_int_eq_self h₂, Submonoid.log_pow_int_eq_self h₂]
apply dyadic_aux
rwa [ha₁, ha₂, mul_comm, mul_comm m₂]
· have : (1 : ℤ) ≤ 2 ^ y₃ := mod_cast Nat.one_le_pow y₃ 2 Nat.succ_pos'
linarith
map_zero' := Localization.liftOn_zero _ _
map_add' x y :=
Localization.induction_on₂ x y <| by
rintro ⟨a, ⟨b, ⟨b', rfl⟩⟩⟩ ⟨c, ⟨d, ⟨d', rfl⟩⟩⟩
have h₂ : 1 < (2 : ℤ).natAbs := one_lt_two
have hpow₂ := Submonoid.log_pow_int_eq_self h₂
simp_rw [Submonoid.pow_apply] at hpow₂
simp_rw [Localization.add_mk, Localization.liftOn_mk,
Submonoid.log_mul (Int.pow_right_injective h₂), hpow₂]
calc
(2 ^ b' * c + 2 ^ d' * a) • powHalf (b' + d') =
(c * 2 ^ b') • powHalf (b' + d') + (a * 2 ^ d') • powHalf (d' + b') := by
simp only [add_smul, mul_comm, add_comm]
_ = c • powHalf d' + a • powHalf b' := by simp only [zsmul_pow_two_powHalf]
_ = a • powHalf b' + c • powHalf d' := add_comm _ _
#align surreal.dyadic_map Surreal.dyadicMap
@[simp]
theorem dyadicMap_apply (m : ℤ) (p : Submonoid.powers (2 : ℤ)) :
dyadicMap (IsLocalization.mk' (Localization (Submonoid.powers 2)) m p) =
m • powHalf (Submonoid.log p) := by
rw [← Localization.mk_eq_mk']; rfl
#align surreal.dyadic_map_apply Surreal.dyadicMap_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `dyadicMap_apply_pow'`
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Surreal/Dyadic.lean | 270 | 273 | theorem dyadicMap_apply_pow (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) :
dyadicMap (IsLocalization.mk' (Localization (Submonoid.powers 2)) m (Submonoid.pow 2 n)) =
m • powHalf n := by |
rw [dyadicMap_apply, @Submonoid.log_pow_int_eq_self 2 one_lt_two]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
#align_import data.int.bitwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0743cc5d9d86bcd1bba10f480e948a257d65056f"
#align_import init.data.int.bitwise from "leanprover-community/lean"@"855e5b74e3a52a40552e8f067169d747d48743fd"
/-!
# Bitwise operations on integers
Possibly only of archaeological significance.
## Recursors
* `Int.bitCasesOn`: Parity disjunction. Something is true/defined on `ℤ` if it's true/defined for
even and for odd values.
-/
namespace Int
/-- `div2 n = n/2`-/
def div2 : ℤ → ℤ
| (n : ℕ) => n.div2
| -[n +1] => negSucc n.div2
#align int.div2 Int.div2
/-- `bodd n` returns `true` if `n` is odd-/
def bodd : ℤ → Bool
| (n : ℕ) => n.bodd
| -[n +1] => not (n.bodd)
#align int.bodd Int.bodd
-- Porting note: `bit0, bit1` deprecated, do we need to adapt `bit`?
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- `bit b` appends the digit `b` to the binary representation of
its integer input. -/
def bit (b : Bool) : ℤ → ℤ :=
cond b bit1 bit0
#align int.bit Int.bit
/-- `testBit m n` returns whether the `(n+1)ˢᵗ` least significant bit is `1` or `0`-/
def testBit : ℤ → ℕ → Bool
| (m : ℕ), n => Nat.testBit m n
| -[m +1], n => !(Nat.testBit m n)
#align int.test_bit Int.testBit
/-- `Int.natBitwise` is an auxiliary definition for `Int.bitwise`. -/
def natBitwise (f : Bool → Bool → Bool) (m n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
cond (f false false) -[ Nat.bitwise (fun x y => not (f x y)) m n +1] (Nat.bitwise f m n)
#align int.nat_bitwise Int.natBitwise
/-- `Int.bitwise` applies the function `f` to pairs of bits in the same position in
the binary representations of its inputs. -/
def bitwise (f : Bool → Bool → Bool) : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => natBitwise f m n
| (m : ℕ), -[n +1] => natBitwise (fun x y => f x (not y)) m n
| -[m +1], (n : ℕ) => natBitwise (fun x y => f (not x) y) m n
| -[m +1], -[n +1] => natBitwise (fun x y => f (not x) (not y)) m n
#align int.bitwise Int.bitwise
/-- `lnot` flips all the bits in the binary representation of its input -/
def lnot : ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ) => -[m +1]
| -[m +1] => m
#align int.lnot Int.lnot
/-- `lor` takes two integers and returns their bitwise `or`-/
def lor : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => m ||| n
| (m : ℕ), -[n +1] => -[Nat.ldiff n m +1]
| -[m +1], (n : ℕ) => -[Nat.ldiff m n +1]
| -[m +1], -[n +1] => -[m &&& n +1]
#align int.lor Int.lor
/-- `land` takes two integers and returns their bitwise `and`-/
def land : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => m &&& n
| (m : ℕ), -[n +1] => Nat.ldiff m n
| -[m +1], (n : ℕ) => Nat.ldiff n m
| -[m +1], -[n +1] => -[m ||| n +1]
#align int.land Int.land
-- Porting note: I don't know why `Nat.ldiff` got the prime, but I'm matching this change here
/-- `ldiff a b` performs bitwise set difference. For each corresponding
pair of bits taken as booleans, say `aᵢ` and `bᵢ`, it applies the
boolean operation `aᵢ ∧ bᵢ` to obtain the `iᵗʰ` bit of the result. -/
def ldiff : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.ldiff m n
| (m : ℕ), -[n +1] => m &&& n
| -[m +1], (n : ℕ) => -[m ||| n +1]
| -[m +1], -[n +1] => Nat.ldiff n m
#align int.ldiff Int.ldiff
-- Porting note: I don't know why `Nat.xor'` got the prime, but I'm matching this change here
/-- `xor` computes the bitwise `xor` of two natural numbers-/
protected def xor : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => (m ^^^ n)
| (m : ℕ), -[n +1] => -[(m ^^^ n) +1]
| -[m +1], (n : ℕ) => -[(m ^^^ n) +1]
| -[m +1], -[n +1] => (m ^^^ n)
#align int.lxor Int.xor
/-- `m <<< n` produces an integer whose binary representation
is obtained by left-shifting the binary representation of `m` by `n` places -/
instance : ShiftLeft ℤ where
shiftLeft
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.shiftLeft' false m n
| (m : ℕ), -[n +1] => m >>> (Nat.succ n)
| -[m +1], (n : ℕ) => -[Nat.shiftLeft' true m n +1]
| -[m +1], -[n +1] => -[m >>> (Nat.succ n) +1]
#align int.shiftl ShiftLeft.shiftLeft
/-- `m >>> n` produces an integer whose binary representation
is obtained by right-shifting the binary representation of `m` by `n` places -/
instance : ShiftRight ℤ where
shiftRight m n := m <<< (-n)
#align int.shiftr ShiftRight.shiftRight
/-! ### bitwise ops -/
@[simp]
theorem bodd_zero : bodd 0 = false :=
rfl
#align int.bodd_zero Int.bodd_zero
@[simp]
theorem bodd_one : bodd 1 = true :=
rfl
#align int.bodd_one Int.bodd_one
theorem bodd_two : bodd 2 = false :=
rfl
#align int.bodd_two Int.bodd_two
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bodd_coe (n : ℕ) : Int.bodd n = Nat.bodd n :=
rfl
#align int.bodd_coe Int.bodd_coe
@[simp]
theorem bodd_subNatNat (m n : ℕ) : bodd (subNatNat m n) = xor m.bodd n.bodd := by
apply subNatNat_elim m n fun m n i => bodd i = xor m.bodd n.bodd <;>
intros i j <;>
simp only [Int.bodd, Int.bodd_coe, Nat.bodd_add] <;>
cases Nat.bodd i <;> simp
#align int.bodd_sub_nat_nat Int.bodd_subNatNat
@[simp]
theorem bodd_negOfNat (n : ℕ) : bodd (negOfNat n) = n.bodd := by
cases n <;> simp (config := {decide := true})
rfl
#align int.bodd_neg_of_nat Int.bodd_negOfNat
@[simp]
theorem bodd_neg (n : ℤ) : bodd (-n) = bodd n := by
cases n with
| ofNat =>
rw [← negOfNat_eq, bodd_negOfNat]
simp
| negSucc n =>
rw [neg_negSucc, bodd_coe, Nat.bodd_succ]
change (!Nat.bodd n) = !(bodd n)
rw [bodd_coe]
-- Porting note: Heavily refactored proof, used to work all with `simp`:
-- `cases n <;> simp [Neg.neg, Int.natCast_eq_ofNat, Int.neg, bodd, -of_nat_eq_coe]`
#align int.bodd_neg Int.bodd_neg
@[simp]
theorem bodd_add (m n : ℤ) : bodd (m + n) = xor (bodd m) (bodd n) := by
cases' m with m m <;>
cases' n with n n <;>
simp only [ofNat_eq_coe, ofNat_add_negSucc, negSucc_add_ofNat,
negSucc_add_negSucc, bodd_subNatNat] <;>
simp only [negSucc_coe, bodd_neg, bodd_coe, ← Nat.bodd_add, Bool.xor_comm, ← Nat.cast_add]
rw [← Nat.succ_add, add_assoc]
-- Porting note: Heavily refactored proof, used to work all with `simp`:
-- `by cases m with m m; cases n with n n; unfold has_add.add;`
-- `simp [int.add, -of_nat_eq_coe, bool.xor_comm]`
#align int.bodd_add Int.bodd_add
@[simp]
theorem bodd_mul (m n : ℤ) : bodd (m * n) = (bodd m && bodd n) := by
cases' m with m m <;> cases' n with n n <;>
simp only [ofNat_eq_coe, ofNat_mul_negSucc, negSucc_mul_ofNat, ofNat_mul_ofNat,
negSucc_mul_negSucc] <;>
simp only [negSucc_coe, bodd_neg, bodd_coe, ← Nat.bodd_mul]
-- Porting note: Heavily refactored proof, used to be:
-- `by cases m with m m; cases n with n n;`
-- `simp [← int.mul_def, int.mul, -of_nat_eq_coe, bool.xor_comm]`
#align int.bodd_mul Int.bodd_mul
theorem bodd_add_div2 : ∀ n, cond (bodd n) 1 0 + 2 * div2 n = n
| (n : ℕ) => by
rw [show (cond (bodd n) 1 0 : ℤ) = (cond (bodd n) 1 0 : ℕ) by cases bodd n <;> rfl]
exact congr_arg ofNat n.bodd_add_div2
| -[n+1] => by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (congr_arg negSucc n.bodd_add_div2)
dsimp [bodd]; cases Nat.bodd n <;> dsimp [cond, not, div2, Int.mul]
· change -[2 * Nat.div2 n+1] = _
rw [zero_add]
· rw [zero_add, add_comm]
rfl
#align int.bodd_add_div2 Int.bodd_add_div2
theorem div2_val : ∀ n, div2 n = n / 2
| (n : ℕ) => congr_arg ofNat n.div2_val
| -[n+1] => congr_arg negSucc n.div2_val
#align int.div2_val Int.div2_val
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated]
theorem bit0_val (n : ℤ) : bit0 n = 2 * n :=
(two_mul _).symm
#align int.bit0_val Int.bit0_val
@[deprecated]
theorem bit1_val (n : ℤ) : bit1 n = 2 * n + 1 :=
congr_arg (· + (1 : ℤ)) (bit0_val _)
#align int.bit1_val Int.bit1_val
theorem bit_val (b n) : bit b n = 2 * n + cond b 1 0 := by
cases b
· apply (bit0_val n).trans (add_zero _).symm
· apply bit1_val
#align int.bit_val Int.bit_val
theorem bit_decomp (n : ℤ) : bit (bodd n) (div2 n) = n :=
(bit_val _ _).trans <| (add_comm _ _).trans <| bodd_add_div2 _
#align int.bit_decomp Int.bit_decomp
/-- Defines a function from `ℤ` conditionally, if it is defined for odd and even integers separately
using `bit`. -/
def bitCasesOn.{u} {C : ℤ → Sort u} (n) (h : ∀ b n, C (bit b n)) : C n := by
rw [← bit_decomp n]
apply h
#align int.bit_cases_on Int.bitCasesOn
@[simp]
theorem bit_zero : bit false 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align int.bit_zero Int.bit_zero
@[simp]
theorem bit_coe_nat (b) (n : ℕ) : bit b n = Nat.bit b n := by
rw [bit_val, Nat.bit_val]
cases b <;> rfl
#align int.bit_coe_nat Int.bit_coe_nat
@[simp]
theorem bit_negSucc (b) (n : ℕ) : bit b -[n+1] = -[Nat.bit (not b) n+1] := by
rw [bit_val, Nat.bit_val]
cases b <;> rfl
#align int.bit_neg_succ Int.bit_negSucc
@[simp]
theorem bodd_bit (b n) : bodd (bit b n) = b := by
rw [bit_val]
cases b <;> cases bodd n <;> simp [(show bodd 2 = false by rfl)]
#align int.bodd_bit Int.bodd_bit
@[simp, deprecated]
theorem bodd_bit0 (n : ℤ) : bodd (bit0 n) = false :=
bodd_bit false n
#align int.bodd_bit0 Int.bodd_bit0
@[simp, deprecated]
theorem bodd_bit1 (n : ℤ) : bodd (bit1 n) = true :=
bodd_bit true n
#align int.bodd_bit1 Int.bodd_bit1
@[deprecated]
theorem bit0_ne_bit1 (m n : ℤ) : bit0 m ≠ bit1 n :=
mt (congr_arg bodd) <| by simp
#align int.bit0_ne_bit1 Int.bit0_ne_bit1
@[deprecated]
theorem bit1_ne_bit0 (m n : ℤ) : bit1 m ≠ bit0 n :=
(bit0_ne_bit1 _ _).symm
#align int.bit1_ne_bit0 Int.bit1_ne_bit0
@[deprecated]
theorem bit1_ne_zero (m : ℤ) : bit1 m ≠ 0 := by simpa only [bit0_zero] using bit1_ne_bit0 m 0
#align int.bit1_ne_zero Int.bit1_ne_zero
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem testBit_bit_zero (b) : ∀ n, testBit (bit b n) 0 = b
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [bit_coe_nat]; apply Nat.testBit_bit_zero
| -[n+1] => by
rw [bit_negSucc]; dsimp [testBit]; rw [Nat.testBit_bit_zero]; clear testBit_bit_zero;
cases b <;>
rfl
#align int.test_bit_zero Int.testBit_bit_zero
@[simp]
theorem testBit_bit_succ (m b) : ∀ n, testBit (bit b n) (Nat.succ m) = testBit n m
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [bit_coe_nat]; apply Nat.testBit_bit_succ
| -[n+1] => by
dsimp only [testBit]
simp only [bit_negSucc]
cases b <;> simp only [Bool.not_false, Bool.not_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ]
#align int.test_bit_succ Int.testBit_bit_succ
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO
-- private unsafe def bitwise_tac : tactic Unit :=
-- sorry
-- #align int.bitwise_tac int.bitwise_tac
-- Porting note: Was `bitwise_tac` in mathlib
theorem bitwise_or : bitwise or = lor := by
funext m n
cases' m with m m <;> cases' n with n n <;> try {rfl}
<;> simp only [bitwise, natBitwise, Bool.not_false, Bool.or_true, cond_true, lor, Nat.ldiff,
negSucc.injEq, Bool.true_or, Nat.land]
· rw [Nat.bitwise_swap, Function.swap]
congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
· congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
· congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
#align int.bitwise_or Int.bitwise_or
-- Porting note: Was `bitwise_tac` in mathlib
theorem bitwise_and : bitwise and = land := by
funext m n
cases' m with m m <;> cases' n with n n <;> try {rfl}
<;> simp only [bitwise, natBitwise, Bool.not_false, Bool.or_true,
cond_false, cond_true, lor, Nat.ldiff, Bool.and_true, negSucc.injEq,
Bool.and_false, Nat.land]
· rw [Nat.bitwise_swap, Function.swap]
congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
· congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
#align int.bitwise_and Int.bitwise_and
-- Porting note: Was `bitwise_tac` in mathlib
theorem bitwise_diff : (bitwise fun a b => a && not b) = ldiff := by
funext m n
cases' m with m m <;> cases' n with n n <;> try {rfl}
<;> simp only [bitwise, natBitwise, Bool.not_false, Bool.or_true,
cond_false, cond_true, lor, Nat.ldiff, Bool.and_true, negSucc.injEq,
Bool.and_false, Nat.land, Bool.not_true, ldiff, Nat.lor]
· congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
· congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
· rw [Nat.bitwise_swap, Function.swap]
congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
#align int.bitwise_diff Int.bitwise_diff
-- Porting note: Was `bitwise_tac` in mathlib
theorem bitwise_xor : bitwise xor = Int.xor := by
funext m n
cases' m with m m <;> cases' n with n n <;> try {rfl}
<;> simp only [bitwise, natBitwise, Bool.not_false, Bool.or_true, Bool.bne_eq_xor,
cond_false, cond_true, lor, Nat.ldiff, Bool.and_true, negSucc.injEq, Bool.false_xor,
Bool.true_xor, Bool.and_false, Nat.land, Bool.not_true, ldiff,
HOr.hOr, OrOp.or, Nat.lor, Int.xor, HXor.hXor, Xor.xor, Nat.xor]
· congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
· congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
· congr
funext x y
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
#align int.bitwise_xor Int.bitwise_xor
@[simp]
theorem bitwise_bit (f : Bool → Bool → Bool) (a m b n) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
cases' m with m m <;> cases' n with n n <;>
simp [bitwise, ofNat_eq_coe, bit_coe_nat, natBitwise, Bool.not_false, Bool.not_eq_false',
bit_negSucc]
· by_cases h : f false false <;> simp (config := {decide := true}) [h]
· by_cases h : f false true <;> simp (config := {decide := true}) [h]
· by_cases h : f true false <;> simp (config := {decide := true}) [h]
· by_cases h : f true true <;> simp (config := {decide := true}) [h]
#align int.bitwise_bit Int.bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem lor_bit (a m b n) : lor (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a || b) (lor m n) := by
rw [← bitwise_or, bitwise_bit]
#align int.lor_bit Int.lor_bit
@[simp]
theorem land_bit (a m b n) : land (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && b) (land m n) := by
rw [← bitwise_and, bitwise_bit]
#align int.land_bit Int.land_bit
@[simp]
theorem ldiff_bit (a m b n) : ldiff (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && not b) (ldiff m n) := by
rw [← bitwise_diff, bitwise_bit]
#align int.ldiff_bit Int.ldiff_bit
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Bitwise.lean | 417 | 418 | theorem lxor_bit (a m b n) : Int.xor (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (xor a b) (Int.xor m n) := by |
rw [← bitwise_xor, bitwise_bit]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetToL1
#align_import measure_theory.integral.bochner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Bochner integral
The Bochner integral extends the definition of the Lebesgue integral to functions that map from a
measure space into a Banach space (complete normed vector space). It is constructed here by
extending the integral on simple functions.
## Main definitions
The Bochner integral is defined through the extension process described in the file `SetToL1`,
which follows these steps:
1. Define the integral of the indicator of a set. This is `weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal * x`.
`weightedSMul μ` is shown to be linear in the value `x` and `DominatedFinMeasAdditive`
(defined in the file `SetToL1`) with respect to the set `s`.
2. Define the integral on simple functions of the type `SimpleFunc α E` (notation : `α →ₛ E`)
where `E` is a real normed space. (See `SimpleFunc.integral` for details.)
3. Transfer this definition to define the integral on `L1.simpleFunc α E` (notation :
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E`), see `L1.simpleFunc.integral`. Show that this integral is a continuous linear
map from `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` to `E`.
4. Define the Bochner integral on L1 functions by extending the integral on integrable simple
functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` using `ContinuousLinearMap.extend` and the fact that the embedding of
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E` into `α →₁[μ] E` is dense.
5. Define the Bochner integral on functions as the Bochner integral of its equivalence class in L1
space, if it is in L1, and 0 otherwise.
The result of that construction is `∫ a, f a ∂μ`, which is definitionally equal to
`setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f`. Some basic properties of the integral
(like linearity) are particular cases of the properties of `setToFun` (which are described in the
file `SetToL1`).
## Main statements
1. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → E`, where `α` is a measure
space and `E` is a real normed space.
* `integral_zero` : `∫ 0 ∂μ = 0`
* `integral_add` : `∫ x, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f ∂μ + ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_neg` : `∫ x, - f x ∂μ = - ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_sub` : `∫ x, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ - ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_smul` : `∫ x, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_congr_ae` : `f =ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `norm_integral_le_integral_norm` : `‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ`
2. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → ℝ`, where `α` is a measure
space.
* `integral_nonneg_of_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos_of_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonneg` : `0 ≤ f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos` : `f ≤ 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
3. Propositions connecting the Bochner integral with the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions,
which is called `lintegral` and has the notation `∫⁻`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` :
`∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f⁺ x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f⁻ x ∂μ`,
where `f⁺` is the positive part of `f` and `f⁻` is the negative part of `f`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`
4. (In the file `DominatedConvergence`)
`tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence` : the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
5. (In the file `SetIntegral`) integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm`
* `LinearIsometry.integral_comp_comm`
## Notes
Some tips on how to prove a proposition if the API for the Bochner integral is not enough so that
you need to unfold the definition of the Bochner integral and go back to simple functions.
One method is to use the theorem `Integrable.induction` in the file `SimpleFuncDenseLp` (or one
of the related results, like `Lp.induction` for functions in `Lp`), which allows you to prove
something for an arbitrary integrable function.
Another method is using the following steps.
See `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` for a complicated example, which proves
that `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, with the first integral sign being the Bochner integral of a real-valued
function `f : α → ℝ`, and second and third integral sign being the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued
functions (called `lintegral`). The proof of `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part`
is scattered in sections with the name `posPart`.
Here are the usual steps of proving that a property `p`, say `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, holds for all
functions :
1. First go to the `L¹` space.
For example, if you see `ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal <| ‖f a‖)`, that is the norm of
`f` in `L¹` space. Rewrite using `L1.norm_of_fun_eq_lintegral_norm`.
2. Show that the set `{f ∈ L¹ | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}` is closed in `L¹` using `isClosed_eq`.
3. Show that the property holds for all simple functions `s` in `L¹` space.
Typically, you need to convert various notions to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart, using lemmas
like `L1.integral_coe_eq_integral`.
4. Since simple functions are dense in `L¹`,
```
univ = closure {s simple}
= closure {s simple | ∫ s = ∫⁻ s⁺ - ∫⁻ s⁻} : the property holds for all simple functions
⊆ closure {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}
= {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻} : closure of a closed set is itself
```
Use `isClosed_property` or `DenseRange.induction_on` for this argument.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ E` : simple functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/Integration`)
* `α →₁[μ] E` : functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable functions (defined in
`MeasureTheory/LpSpace`)
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` : simple functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable simple
functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/SimpleFuncDense`)
* `∫ a, f a ∂μ` : integral of `f` with respect to a measure `μ`
* `∫ a, f a` : integral of `f` with respect to `volume`, the default measure on the ambient type
We also define notations for integral on a set, which are described in the file
`MeasureTheory/SetIntegral`.
Note : `ₛ` is typed using `\_s`. Sometimes it shows as a box if the font is missing.
## Tags
Bochner integral, simple function, function space, Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Differentiable
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*}
section WeightedSMul
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a set `s`, return the continuous linear map `fun x => (μ s).toReal • x`. The extension
of that set function through `setToL1` gives the Bochner integral of L1 functions. -/
def weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : F →L[ℝ] F :=
(μ s).toReal • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) (x : F) :
weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal • x := by simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_apply MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} :
weightedSMul (0 : Measure α) = (0 : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1; simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_zero_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_empty {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
weightedSMul μ ∅ = (0 : F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_empty MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_empty
theorem weightedSMul_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hνs : ν s ≠ ∞) :
(weightedSMul (μ + ν) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul ν s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
rw [Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.toReal_add hμs hνs, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_add_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_add_measure
theorem weightedSMul_smul_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} :
(weightedSMul (c • μ) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = c.toReal • weightedSMul μ s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, smul_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul_measure
theorem weightedSMul_congr (s t : Set α) (hst : μ s = μ t) :
(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr 2
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_congr MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_congr
theorem weightedSMul_null {s : Set α} (h_zero : μ s = 0) : (weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = 0 := by
ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply, h_zero]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_null MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_null
theorem weightedSMul_union' (s t : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [add_apply, weightedSMul_apply,
measure_union (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr h_inter) ht,
ENNReal.toReal_add hs_finite ht_finite, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union' MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union'
@[nolint unusedArguments]
theorem weightedSMul_union (s t : Set α) (_hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t :=
weightedSMul_union' s t ht hs_finite ht_finite h_inter
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union
theorem weightedSMul_smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (c : 𝕜)
(s : Set α) (x : F) : weightedSMul μ s (c • x) = c • weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul
theorem norm_weightedSMul_le (s : Set α) : ‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ ≤ (μ s).toReal :=
calc
‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ = ‖(μ s).toReal‖ * ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F‖ :=
norm_smul (μ s).toReal (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F)
_ ≤ ‖(μ s).toReal‖ :=
((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left norm_id_le (norm_nonneg _)).trans (mul_one _).le)
_ = abs (μ s).toReal := Real.norm_eq_abs _
_ = (μ s).toReal := abs_eq_self.mpr ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.norm_weighted_smul_le MeasureTheory.norm_weightedSMul_le
theorem dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul μ : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) 1 :=
⟨weightedSMul_union, fun s _ _ => (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le⟩
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul MeasureTheory.dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_nonneg (s : Set α) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp only [weightedSMul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, coe_smul', _root_.id, coe_id', Pi.smul_apply]
exact mul_nonneg toReal_nonneg hx
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_nonneg
end WeightedSMul
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section PosPart
variable [LinearOrder E] [Zero E] [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- Positive part of a simple function. -/
def posPart (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
f.map fun b => max b 0
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function. -/
def negPart [Neg E] (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 274 | 275 | theorem posPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (posPart f).map norm = posPart f := by |
ext; rw [map_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]; exact le_max_right _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.BigOperators
#align_import data.dfinsupp.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6623e6af705e97002a9054c1c05a980180276fc1"
/-!
# Dependent functions with finite support
For a non-dependent version see `data/finsupp.lean`.
## Notation
This file introduces the notation `Π₀ a, β a` as notation for `DFinsupp β`, mirroring the `α →₀ β`
notation used for `Finsupp`. This works for nested binders too, with `Π₀ a b, γ a b` as notation
for `DFinsupp (fun a ↦ DFinsupp (γ a))`.
## Implementation notes
The support is internally represented (in the primed `DFinsupp.support'`) as a `Multiset` that
represents a superset of the true support of the function, quotiented by the always-true relation so
that this does not impact equality. This approach has computational benefits over storing a
`Finset`; it allows us to add together two finitely-supported functions without
having to evaluate the resulting function to recompute its support (which would required
decidability of `b = 0` for `b : β i`).
The true support of the function can still be recovered with `DFinsupp.support`; but these
decidability obligations are now postponed to when the support is actually needed. As a consequence,
there are two ways to sum a `DFinsupp`: with `DFinsupp.sum` which works over an arbitrary function
but requires recomputation of the support and therefore a `Decidable` argument; and with
`DFinsupp.sumAddHom` which requires an additive morphism, using its properties to show that
summing over a superset of the support is sufficient.
`Finsupp` takes an altogether different approach here; it uses `Classical.Decidable` and declares
the `Add` instance as noncomputable. This design difference is independent of the fact that
`DFinsupp` is dependently-typed and `Finsupp` is not; in future, we may want to align these two
definitions, or introduce two more definitions for the other combinations of decisions.
-/
universe u u₁ u₂ v v₁ v₂ v₃ w x y l
variable {ι : Type u} {γ : Type w} {β : ι → Type v} {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
variable (β)
/-- A dependent function `Π i, β i` with finite support, with notation `Π₀ i, β i`.
Note that `DFinsupp.support` is the preferred API for accessing the support of the function,
`DFinsupp.support'` is an implementation detail that aids computability; see the implementation
notes in this file for more information. -/
structure DFinsupp [∀ i, Zero (β i)] : Type max u v where mk' ::
/-- The underlying function of a dependent function with finite support (aka `DFinsupp`). -/
toFun : ∀ i, β i
/-- The support of a dependent function with finite support (aka `DFinsupp`). -/
support' : Trunc { s : Multiset ι // ∀ i, i ∈ s ∨ toFun i = 0 }
#align dfinsupp DFinsupp
variable {β}
/-- `Π₀ i, β i` denotes the type of dependent functions with finite support `DFinsupp β`. -/
notation3 "Π₀ "(...)", "r:(scoped f => DFinsupp f) => r
namespace DFinsupp
section Basic
variable [∀ i, Zero (β i)] [∀ i, Zero (β₁ i)] [∀ i, Zero (β₂ i)]
instance instDFunLike : DFunLike (Π₀ i, β i) ι β :=
⟨fun f => f.toFun, fun ⟨f₁, s₁⟩ ⟨f₂, s₁⟩ ↦ fun (h : f₁ = f₂) ↦ by
subst h
congr
apply Subsingleton.elim ⟩
#align dfinsupp.fun_like DFinsupp.instDFunLike
/-- Helper instance for when there are too many metavariables to apply `DFunLike.coeFunForall`
directly. -/
instance : CoeFun (Π₀ i, β i) fun _ => ∀ i, β i :=
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : Π₀ i, β i) : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.to_fun_eq_coe DFinsupp.toFun_eq_coe
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : Π₀ i, β i} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align dfinsupp.ext DFinsupp.ext
#align dfinsupp.ext_iff DFunLike.ext_iff
#align dfinsupp.coe_fn_injective DFunLike.coe_injective
lemma ne_iff {f g : Π₀ i, β i} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ i, f i ≠ g i := DFunLike.ne_iff
instance : Zero (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨⟨0, Trunc.mk <| ⟨∅, fun _ => Or.inr rfl⟩⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk' (f : ∀ i, β i) (s) : ⇑(⟨f, s⟩ : Π₀ i, β i) = f := rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_mk' DFinsupp.coe_mk'
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 := rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_zero DFinsupp.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply (i : ι) : (0 : Π₀ i, β i) i = 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.zero_apply DFinsupp.zero_apply
/-- The composition of `f : β₁ → β₂` and `g : Π₀ i, β₁ i` is
`mapRange f hf g : Π₀ i, β₂ i`, well defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled:
* `DFinsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `DFinsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `dfinsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `dfinsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (x : Π₀ i, β₁ i) : Π₀ i, β₂ i :=
⟨fun i => f i (x i),
x.support'.map fun s => ⟨s.1, fun i => (s.2 i).imp_right fun h : x i = 0 => by
rw [← hf i, ← h]⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.map_range DFinsupp.mapRange
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (i : ι) :
mapRange f hf g i = f i (g i) :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_apply DFinsupp.mapRange_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (h : ∀ i, id (0 : β₁ i) = 0 := fun i => rfl) (g : Π₀ i : ι, β₁ i) :
mapRange (fun i => (id : β₁ i → β₁ i)) h g = g := by
ext
rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_id DFinsupp.mapRange_id
theorem mapRange_comp (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (f₂ : ∀ i, β i → β₁ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : ∀ i, f₂ i 0 = 0) (h : ∀ i, (f i ∘ f₂ i) 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i : ι, β i) :
mapRange (fun i => f i ∘ f₂ i) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) := by
ext
simp only [mapRange_apply]; rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_comp DFinsupp.mapRange_comp
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) :
mapRange f hf (0 : Π₀ i, β₁ i) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [mapRange_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, hf]
#align dfinsupp.map_range_zero DFinsupp.mapRange_zero
/-- Let `f i` be a binary operation `β₁ i → β₂ i → β i` such that `f i 0 0 = 0`.
Then `zipWith f hf` is a binary operation `Π₀ i, β₁ i → Π₀ i, β₂ i → Π₀ i, β i`. -/
def zipWith (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0) (x : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (y : Π₀ i, β₂ i) :
Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨fun i => f i (x i) (y i), by
refine x.support'.bind fun xs => ?_
refine y.support'.map fun ys => ?_
refine ⟨xs + ys, fun i => ?_⟩
obtain h1 | (h1 : x i = 0) := xs.prop i
· left
rw [Multiset.mem_add]
left
exact h1
obtain h2 | (h2 : y i = 0) := ys.prop i
· left
rw [Multiset.mem_add]
right
exact h2
right; rw [← hf, ← h1, ← h2]⟩
#align dfinsupp.zip_with DFinsupp.zipWith
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i)
(g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i) (i : ι) : zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ i = f i (g₁ i) (g₂ i) :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.zip_with_apply DFinsupp.zipWith_apply
section Piecewise
variable (x y : Π₀ i, β i) (s : Set ι) [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ s)]
/-- `x.piecewise y s` is the finitely supported function equal to `x` on the set `s`,
and to `y` on its complement. -/
def piecewise : Π₀ i, β i :=
zipWith (fun i x y => if i ∈ s then x else y) (fun _ => ite_self 0) x y
#align dfinsupp.piecewise DFinsupp.piecewise
theorem piecewise_apply (i : ι) : x.piecewise y s i = if i ∈ s then x i else y i :=
zipWith_apply _ _ x y i
#align dfinsupp.piecewise_apply DFinsupp.piecewise_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_piecewise : ⇑(x.piecewise y s) = s.piecewise x y := by
ext
apply piecewise_apply
#align dfinsupp.coe_piecewise DFinsupp.coe_piecewise
end Piecewise
end Basic
section Algebra
instance [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] : Add (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨zipWith (fun _ => (· + ·)) fun _ => add_zero 0⟩
theorem add_apply [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) :
(g₁ + g₂) i = g₁ i + g₂ i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.add_apply DFinsupp.add_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(g₁ + g₂) = g₁ + g₂ :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_add DFinsupp.coe_add
instance addZeroClass [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] : AddZeroClass (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] [∀ i, IsLeftCancelAdd (β i)] :
IsLeftCancelAdd (Π₀ i, β i) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] [∀ i, IsRightCancelAdd (β i)] :
IsRightCancelAdd (Π₀ i, β i) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] [∀ i, IsCancelAdd (β i)] :
IsCancelAdd (Π₀ i, β i) where
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance doesn't apply as `ℕ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance hasNatScalar [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] : SMul ℕ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun c v => v.mapRange (fun _ => (c • ·)) fun _ => nsmul_zero _⟩
#align dfinsupp.has_nat_scalar DFinsupp.hasNatScalar
theorem nsmul_apply [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] (b : ℕ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (b • v) i = b • v i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.nsmul_apply DFinsupp.nsmul_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nsmul [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] (b : ℕ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(b • v) = b • ⇑v :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_nsmul DFinsupp.coe_nsmul
instance [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] : AddMonoid (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _
/-- Coercion from a `DFinsupp` to a pi type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coeFnAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ ∀ i, β i where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align dfinsupp.coe_fn_add_monoid_hom DFinsupp.coeFnAddMonoidHom
/-- Evaluation at a point is an `AddMonoidHom`. This is the finitely-supported version of
`Pi.evalAddMonoidHom`. -/
def evalAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (i : ι) : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ β i :=
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom β i).comp coeFnAddMonoidHom
#align dfinsupp.eval_add_monoid_hom DFinsupp.evalAddMonoidHom
instance addCommMonoid [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : AddCommMonoid (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_sum {α} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] (s : Finset α) (g : α → Π₀ i, β i) :
⇑(∑ a ∈ s, g a) = ∑ a ∈ s, ⇑(g a) :=
map_sum coeFnAddMonoidHom g s
#align dfinsupp.coe_finset_sum DFinsupp.coe_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem finset_sum_apply {α} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] (s : Finset α) (g : α → Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) :
(∑ a ∈ s, g a) i = ∑ a ∈ s, g a i :=
map_sum (evalAddMonoidHom i) g s
#align dfinsupp.finset_sum_apply DFinsupp.finset_sum_apply
instance [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] : Neg (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun f => f.mapRange (fun _ => Neg.neg) fun _ => neg_zero⟩
theorem neg_apply [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (g : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (-g) i = -g i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.neg_apply DFinsupp.neg_apply
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (g : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(-g) = -g := rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_neg DFinsupp.coe_neg
instance [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] : Sub (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨zipWith (fun _ => Sub.sub) fun _ => sub_zero 0⟩
theorem sub_apply [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (g₁ - g₂) i = g₁ i - g₂ i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.sub_apply DFinsupp.sub_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(g₁ - g₂) = g₁ - g₂ :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_sub DFinsupp.coe_sub
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance doesn't apply as `ℤ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance hasIntScalar [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] : SMul ℤ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun c v => v.mapRange (fun _ => (c • ·)) fun _ => zsmul_zero _⟩
#align dfinsupp.has_int_scalar DFinsupp.hasIntScalar
theorem zsmul_apply [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (b : ℤ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (b • v) i = b • v i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.zsmul_apply DFinsupp.zsmul_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zsmul [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (b : ℤ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(b • v) = b • ⇑v :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_zsmul DFinsupp.coe_zsmul
instance [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] : AddGroup (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addGroup _ coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _)
fun _ _ => coe_zsmul _ _
instance addCommGroup [∀ i, AddCommGroup (β i)] : AddCommGroup (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup _ coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _)
fun _ _ => coe_zsmul _ _
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a semiring action from an action on each
coordinate. -/
instance [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] : SMul γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun c v => v.mapRange (fun _ => (c • ·)) fun _ => smul_zero _⟩
theorem smul_apply [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] (b : γ)
(v : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (b • v) i = b • v i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.smul_apply DFinsupp.smul_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] (b : γ)
(v : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(b • v) = b • ⇑v :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_smul DFinsupp.coe_smul
instance smulCommClass {δ : Type*} [Monoid γ] [Monoid δ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)]
[∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction δ (β i)] [∀ i, SMulCommClass γ δ (β i)] :
SMulCommClass γ δ (Π₀ i, β i) where
smul_comm r s m := ext fun i => by simp only [smul_apply, smul_comm r s (m i)]
instance isScalarTower {δ : Type*} [Monoid γ] [Monoid δ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)]
[∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction δ (β i)] [SMul γ δ]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower γ δ (β i)] : IsScalarTower γ δ (Π₀ i, β i) where
smul_assoc r s m := ext fun i => by simp only [smul_apply, smul_assoc r s (m i)]
instance isCentralScalar [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)]
[∀ i, DistribMulAction γᵐᵒᵖ (β i)] [∀ i, IsCentralScalar γ (β i)] :
IsCentralScalar γ (Π₀ i, β i) where
op_smul_eq_smul r m := ext fun i => by simp only [smul_apply, op_smul_eq_smul r (m i)]
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a `DistribMulAction` structure from such a
structure on each coordinate. -/
instance distribMulAction [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] :
DistribMulAction γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
Function.Injective.distribMulAction coeFnAddMonoidHom DFunLike.coe_injective coe_smul
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a module structure from such a structure on
each coordinate. -/
instance module [Semiring γ] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, Module γ (β i)] :
Module γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DistribMulAction γ (Π₀ i, β i)) with
zero_smul := fun c => ext fun i => by simp only [smul_apply, zero_smul, zero_apply]
add_smul := fun c x y => ext fun i => by simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, add_smul] }
#align dfinsupp.module DFinsupp.module
end Algebra
section FilterAndSubtypeDomain
/-- `Filter p f` is the function which is `f i` if `p i` is true and 0 otherwise. -/
def filter [∀ i, Zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : Π₀ i, β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨fun i => if p i then x i else 0,
x.support'.map fun xs =>
⟨xs.1, fun i => (xs.prop i).imp_right fun H : x i = 0 => by simp only [H, ite_self]⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.filter DFinsupp.filter
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply [∀ i, Zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.filter p i = if p i then f i else 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.filter_apply DFinsupp.filter_apply
theorem filter_apply_pos [∀ i, Zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) {i : ι}
(h : p i) : f.filter p i = f i := by simp only [filter_apply, if_pos h]
#align dfinsupp.filter_apply_pos DFinsupp.filter_apply_pos
theorem filter_apply_neg [∀ i, Zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) {i : ι}
(h : ¬p i) : f.filter p i = 0 := by simp only [filter_apply, if_neg h]
#align dfinsupp.filter_apply_neg DFinsupp.filter_apply_neg
theorem filter_pos_add_filter_neg [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (f : Π₀ i, β i) (p : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] : (f.filter p + f.filter fun i => ¬p i) = f :=
ext fun i => by
simp only [add_apply, filter_apply]; split_ifs <;> simp only [add_zero, zero_add]
#align dfinsupp.filter_pos_add_filter_neg DFinsupp.filter_pos_add_filter_neg
@[simp]
theorem filter_zero [∀ i, Zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(0 : Π₀ i, β i).filter p = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align dfinsupp.filter_zero DFinsupp.filter_zero
@[simp]
theorem filter_add [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f g : Π₀ i, β i) :
(f + g).filter p = f.filter p + g.filter p := by
ext
simp [ite_add_zero]
#align dfinsupp.filter_add DFinsupp.filter_add
@[simp]
theorem filter_smul [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] (p : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] (r : γ) (f : Π₀ i, β i) : (r • f).filter p = r • f.filter p := by
ext
simp [smul_apply, smul_ite]
#align dfinsupp.filter_smul DFinsupp.filter_smul
variable (γ β)
/-- `DFinsupp.filter` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def filterAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(Π₀ i, β i) →+ Π₀ i, β i where
toFun := filter p
map_zero' := filter_zero p
map_add' := filter_add p
#align dfinsupp.filter_add_monoid_hom DFinsupp.filterAddMonoidHom
#align dfinsupp.filter_add_monoid_hom_apply DFinsupp.filterAddMonoidHom_apply
/-- `DFinsupp.filter` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def filterLinearMap [Semiring γ] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, Module γ (β i)] (p : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] : (Π₀ i, β i) →ₗ[γ] Π₀ i, β i where
toFun := filter p
map_add' := filter_add p
map_smul' := filter_smul p
#align dfinsupp.filter_linear_map DFinsupp.filterLinearMap
#align dfinsupp.filter_linear_map_apply DFinsupp.filterLinearMap_apply
variable {γ β}
@[simp]
theorem filter_neg [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
(-f).filter p = -f.filter p :=
(filterAddMonoidHom β p).map_neg f
#align dfinsupp.filter_neg DFinsupp.filter_neg
@[simp]
theorem filter_sub [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f g : Π₀ i, β i) :
(f - g).filter p = f.filter p - g.filter p :=
(filterAddMonoidHom β p).map_sub f g
#align dfinsupp.filter_sub DFinsupp.filter_sub
/-- `subtypeDomain p f` is the restriction of the finitely supported function
`f` to the subtype `p`. -/
def subtypeDomain [∀ i, Zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : Π₀ i, β i) :
Π₀ i : Subtype p, β i :=
⟨fun i => x (i : ι),
x.support'.map fun xs =>
⟨(Multiset.filter p xs.1).attach.map fun j => ⟨j.1, (Multiset.mem_filter.1 j.2).2⟩, fun i =>
(xs.prop i).imp_left fun H =>
Multiset.mem_map.2
⟨⟨i, Multiset.mem_filter.2 ⟨H, i.2⟩⟩, Multiset.mem_attach _ _, Subtype.eta _ _⟩⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain DFinsupp.subtypeDomain
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_zero [∀ i, Zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
subtypeDomain p (0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_zero DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_zero
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_apply [∀ i, Zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {i : Subtype p}
{v : Π₀ i, β i} : (subtypeDomain p v) i = v i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_apply DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_apply
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_add [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
(v v' : Π₀ i, β i) : (v + v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p + v'.subtypeDomain p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_add DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_add
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_smul [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (r : γ) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
(r • f).subtypeDomain p = r • f.subtypeDomain p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_smul DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_smul
variable (γ β)
/-- `subtypeDomain` but as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(Π₀ i : ι, β i) →+ Π₀ i : Subtype p, β i where
toFun := subtypeDomain p
map_zero' := subtypeDomain_zero
map_add' := subtypeDomain_add
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_add_monoid_hom DFinsupp.subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_add_monoid_hom_apply DFinsupp.subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom_apply
/-- `DFinsupp.subtypeDomain` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeDomainLinearMap [Semiring γ] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, Module γ (β i)]
(p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : (Π₀ i, β i) →ₗ[γ] Π₀ i : Subtype p, β i where
toFun := subtypeDomain p
map_add' := subtypeDomain_add
map_smul' := subtypeDomain_smul
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_linear_map DFinsupp.subtypeDomainLinearMap
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_linear_map_apply DFinsupp.subtypeDomainLinearMap_apply
variable {γ β}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_neg [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {v : Π₀ i, β i} :
(-v).subtypeDomain p = -v.subtypeDomain p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_neg DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_neg
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_sub [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
{v v' : Π₀ i, β i} : (v - v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p - v'.subtypeDomain p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_sub DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_sub
end FilterAndSubtypeDomain
variable [DecidableEq ι]
section Basic
variable [∀ i, Zero (β i)]
theorem finite_support (f : Π₀ i, β i) : Set.Finite { i | f i ≠ 0 } :=
Trunc.induction_on f.support' fun xs ↦
xs.1.finite_toSet.subset fun i H ↦ ((xs.prop i).resolve_right H)
#align dfinsupp.finite_support DFinsupp.finite_support
/-- Create an element of `Π₀ i, β i` from a finset `s` and a function `x`
defined on this `Finset`. -/
def mk (s : Finset ι) (x : ∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β (i : ι)) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨fun i => if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0,
Trunc.mk ⟨s.1, fun i => if H : i ∈ s then Or.inl H else Or.inr <| dif_neg H⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.mk DFinsupp.mk
variable {s : Finset ι} {x : ∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β i} {i : ι}
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.mk_apply DFinsupp.mk_apply
theorem mk_of_mem (hi : i ∈ s) : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = x ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
dif_pos hi
#align dfinsupp.mk_of_mem DFinsupp.mk_of_mem
theorem mk_of_not_mem (hi : i ∉ s) : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = 0 :=
dif_neg hi
#align dfinsupp.mk_of_not_mem DFinsupp.mk_of_not_mem
theorem mk_injective (s : Finset ι) : Function.Injective (@mk ι β _ _ s) := by
intro x y H
ext i
have h1 : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = (mk s y : ∀ i, β i) i := by rw [H]
obtain ⟨i, hi : i ∈ s⟩ := i
dsimp only [mk_apply, Subtype.coe_mk] at h1
simpa only [dif_pos hi] using h1
#align dfinsupp.mk_injective DFinsupp.mk_injective
instance unique [∀ i, Subsingleton (β i)] : Unique (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.unique
#align dfinsupp.unique DFinsupp.unique
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] : Unique (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.unique
#align dfinsupp.unique_of_is_empty DFinsupp.uniqueOfIsEmpty
/-- Given `Fintype ι`, `equivFunOnFintype` is the `Equiv` between `Π₀ i, β i` and `Π i, β i`.
(All dependent functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps apply]
def equivFunOnFintype [Fintype ι] : (Π₀ i, β i) ≃ ∀ i, β i where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := ⟨f, Trunc.mk ⟨Finset.univ.1, fun _ => Or.inl <| Finset.mem_univ_val _⟩⟩
left_inv _ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype_apply DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype_apply
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFintype_symm_coe [Fintype ι] (f : Π₀ i, β i) : equivFunOnFintype.symm f = f :=
Equiv.symm_apply_apply _ _
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype_symm_coe DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype_symm_coe
/-- The function `single i b : Π₀ i, β i` sends `i` to `b`
and all other points to `0`. -/
def single (i : ι) (b : β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨Pi.single i b,
Trunc.mk ⟨{i}, fun j => (Decidable.eq_or_ne j i).imp (by simp) fun h => Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.single DFinsupp.single
theorem single_eq_pi_single {i b} : ⇑(single i b : Π₀ i, β i) = Pi.single i b :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_pi_single DFinsupp.single_eq_pi_single
@[simp]
theorem single_apply {i i' b} :
(single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = if h : i = i' then Eq.recOn h b else 0 := by
rw [single_eq_pi_single, Pi.single, Function.update]
simp [@eq_comm _ i i']
#align dfinsupp.single_apply DFinsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem single_zero (i) : (single i 0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| Pi.single_zero _
#align dfinsupp.single_zero DFinsupp.single_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem single_eq_same {i b} : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i = b := by
simp only [single_apply, dite_eq_ite, ite_true]
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_same DFinsupp.single_eq_same
theorem single_eq_of_ne {i i' b} (h : i ≠ i') : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = 0 := by
simp only [single_apply, dif_neg h]
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_of_ne DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne
theorem single_injective {i} : Function.Injective (single i : β i → Π₀ i, β i) := fun _ _ H =>
Pi.single_injective β i <| DFunLike.coe_injective.eq_iff.mpr H
#align dfinsupp.single_injective DFinsupp.single_injective
/-- Like `Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff`, but with a `HEq` due to dependent types -/
theorem single_eq_single_iff (i j : ι) (xi : β i) (xj : β j) :
DFinsupp.single i xi = DFinsupp.single j xj ↔ i = j ∧ HEq xi xj ∨ xi = 0 ∧ xj = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hij : i = j
· subst hij
exact Or.inl ⟨rfl, heq_of_eq (DFinsupp.single_injective h)⟩
· have h_coe : ⇑(DFinsupp.single i xi) = DFinsupp.single j xj := congr_arg (⇑) h
have hci := congr_fun h_coe i
have hcj := congr_fun h_coe j
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_same] at hci hcj
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne (Ne.symm hij)] at hci
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne hij] at hcj
exact Or.inr ⟨hci, hcj.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, hxi⟩ | ⟨hi, hj⟩)
· rw [eq_of_heq hxi]
· rw [hi, hj, DFinsupp.single_zero, DFinsupp.single_zero]
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_single_iff DFinsupp.single_eq_single_iff
/-- `DFinsupp.single a b` is injective in `a`. For the statement that it is injective in `b`, see
`DFinsupp.single_injective` -/
theorem single_left_injective {b : ∀ i : ι, β i} (h : ∀ i, b i ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective (fun i => single i (b i) : ι → Π₀ i, β i) := fun _ _ H =>
(((single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _).mp H).resolve_right fun hb => h _ hb.1).left
#align dfinsupp.single_left_injective DFinsupp.single_left_injective
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero {i : ι} {xi : β i} : single i xi = 0 ↔ xi = 0 := by
rw [← single_zero i, single_eq_single_iff]
simp
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_zero DFinsupp.single_eq_zero
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/Basic.lean | 680 | 688 | theorem filter_single (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (i : ι) (x : β i) :
(single i x).filter p = if p i then single i x else 0 := by |
ext j
have := apply_ite (fun x : Π₀ i, β i => x j) (p i) (single i x) 0
dsimp at this
rw [filter_apply, this]
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· rfl
· rw [single_eq_of_ne hij, ite_self, ite_self]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
#align_import algebra.order.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"afdb43429311b885a7988ea15d0bac2aac80f69c"
/-!
# Floor and ceil
## Summary
We define the natural- and integer-valued floor and ceil functions on linearly ordered rings.
## Main Definitions
* `FloorSemiring`: An ordered semiring with natural-valued floor and ceil.
* `Nat.floor a`: Greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. Equal to `0` if `a < 0`.
* `Nat.ceil a`: Least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n`.
* `FloorRing`: A linearly ordered ring with integer-valued floor and ceil.
* `Int.floor a`: Greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`.
* `Int.ceil a`: Least integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`.
* `Int.fract a`: Fractional part of `a`, defined as `a - floor a`.
* `round a`: Nearest integer to `a`. It rounds halves towards infinity.
## Notations
* `⌊a⌋₊` is `Nat.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉₊` is `Nat.ceil a`.
* `⌊a⌋` is `Int.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉` is `Int.ceil a`.
The index `₊` in the notations for `Nat.floor` and `Nat.ceil` is used in analogy to the notation
for `nnnorm`.
## TODO
`LinearOrderedRing`/`LinearOrderedSemiring` can be relaxed to `OrderedRing`/`OrderedSemiring` in
many lemmas.
## Tags
rounding, floor, ceil
-/
open Set
variable {F α β : Type*}
/-! ### Floor semiring -/
/-- A `FloorSemiring` is an ordered semiring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℕ` satisfying `∀ (n : ℕ) (x : α), n ≤ ⌊x⌋ ↔ (n : α) ≤ x)`.
Note that many lemmas require a `LinearOrder`. Please see the above `TODO`. -/
class FloorSemiring (α) [OrderedSemiring α] where
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor a` computes the greatest natural `n` such that `(n : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil a` computes the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ (n : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor` of a negative element is zero. -/
floor_of_neg {a : α} (ha : a < 0) : floor a = 0
/-- A natural number `n` is smaller than `FloorSemiring.floor a` iff its coercion to `α` is
smaller than `a`. -/
gc_floor {a : α} {n : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ floor a ↔ (n : α) ≤ a
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℕ → α`. -/
gc_ceil : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_semiring FloorSemiring
instance : FloorSemiring ℕ where
floor := id
ceil := id
floor_of_neg ha := (Nat.not_lt_zero _ ha).elim
gc_floor _ := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil n a := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
namespace Nat
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
/-- `⌊a⌋₊` is the greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. If `a` is negative, then `⌊a⌋₊ = 0`. -/
def floor : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.floor
#align nat.floor Nat.floor
/-- `⌈a⌉₊` is the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n` -/
def ceil : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.ceil
#align nat.ceil Nat.ceil
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat : (Nat.floor : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.floor_nat Nat.floor_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_nat : (Nat.ceil : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.ceil_nat Nat.ceil_nat
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋₊" => Nat.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉₊" => Nat.ceil a
end OrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
theorem le_floor_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a :=
FloorSemiring.gc_floor ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff Nat.le_floor_iff
theorem le_floor (h : (n : α) ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ :=
(le_floor_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h).2 h
#align nat.le_floor Nat.le_floor
theorem floor_lt (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.floor_lt Nat.floor_lt
theorem floor_lt_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
(floor_lt ha).trans <| by rw [Nat.cast_one]
#align nat.floor_lt_one Nat.floor_lt_one
theorem lt_of_floor_lt (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < n) : a < n :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' => (le_floor h').not_lt h
#align nat.lt_of_floor_lt Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
theorem lt_one_of_floor_lt_one (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1) : a < 1 := mod_cast lt_of_floor_lt h
#align nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one Nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one
theorem floor_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : α) ≤ a :=
(le_floor_iff ha).1 le_rfl
#align nat.floor_le Nat.floor_le
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊.succ :=
lt_of_floor_lt <| Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align nat.lt_succ_floor Nat.lt_succ_floor
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by simpa using lt_succ_floor a
#align nat.lt_floor_add_one Nat.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor_iff, Nat.cast_le]
exact n.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_coe Nat.floor_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-08")] alias floor_coe := floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_zero Nat.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_one Nat.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
Nat.floor_natCast _
theorem floor_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 :=
ha.lt_or_eq.elim FloorSemiring.floor_of_neg <| by
rintro rfl
exact floor_zero
#align nat.floor_of_nonpos Nat.floor_of_nonpos
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℕ) := fun a b h => by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact le_floor ((floor_le ha).trans h)
#align nat.floor_mono Nat.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋₊ ≤ ⌊y⌋₊ := floor_mono
theorem le_floor_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact
iff_of_false (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn).not_le
(not_le_of_lt <| ha.trans_lt <| cast_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
· exact le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff' Nat.le_floor_iff'
@[simp]
theorem one_le_floor_iff (x : α) : 1 ≤ ⌊x⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
mod_cast @le_floor_iff' α _ _ x 1 one_ne_zero
#align nat.one_le_floor_iff Nat.one_le_floor_iff
theorem floor_lt' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff' hn
#align nat.floor_lt' Nat.floor_lt'
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero`
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero, cast_one]
#align nat.floor_pos Nat.floor_pos
theorem pos_of_floor_pos (h : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊) : 0 < a :=
(le_or_lt a 0).resolve_left fun ha => lt_irrefl 0 <| by rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha] at h
#align nat.pos_of_floor_pos Nat.pos_of_floor_pos
theorem lt_of_lt_floor (h : n < ⌊a⌋₊) : ↑n < a :=
(Nat.cast_lt.2 h).trans_le <| floor_le (pos_of_floor_pos <| (Nat.zero_le n).trans_lt h).le
#align nat.lt_of_lt_floor Nat.lt_of_lt_floor
theorem floor_le_of_le (h : a ≤ n) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ n :=
le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.2 lt_of_lt_floor h
#align nat.floor_le_of_le Nat.floor_le_of_le
theorem floor_le_one_of_le_one (h : a ≤ 1) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ 1 :=
floor_le_of_le <| h.trans_eq <| Nat.cast_one.symm
#align nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one Nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← lt_one_iff, ← @cast_one α]
exact floor_lt' Nat.one_ne_zero
#align nat.floor_eq_zero Nat.floor_eq_zero
theorem floor_eq_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff ha, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt ha, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff Nat.floor_eq_iff
theorem floor_eq_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff' hn, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt' (Nat.add_one_ne_zero n),
Nat.lt_add_one_iff, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff' Nat.floor_eq_iff'
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℕ) : ∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), ⌊a⌋₊ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
(floor_eq_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h₀).mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℕ) :
∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), (⌊a⌋₊ : α) = n :=
fun x hx => mod_cast floor_eq_on_Ico n x hx
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico' Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico'
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_zero : (floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iio 1 :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_floor_zero Nat.preimage_floor_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(n:α)`
theorem preimage_floor_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ico (n:α) (n + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff' hn
#align nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection (ceil : α → ℕ) (↑) :=
FloorSemiring.gc_ceil
#align nat.gc_ceil_coe Nat.gc_ceil_coe
@[simp]
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n :=
gc_ceil_coe _ _
#align nat.ceil_le Nat.ceil_le
theorem lt_ceil : n < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align nat.lt_ceil Nat.lt_ceil
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : n + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a := by
rw [← Nat.lt_ceil, Nat.add_one_le_iff]
#align nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add 1, Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.one_le_ceil_iff Nat.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one Nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ :=
ceil_le.1 le_rfl
#align nat.le_ceil Nat.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α] (z : ℤ) :
⌈(z : α)⌉₊ = z.toNat :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
simp only [ceil_le, Int.toNat_le]
norm_cast
#align nat.ceil_int_cast Nat.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, cast_le]
#align nat.ceil_nat_cast Nat.ceil_natCast
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℕ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align nat.ceil_mono Nat.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉₊ ≤ ⌈y⌉₊ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_zero Nat.ceil_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_one : ⌈(1 : α)⌉₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_one Nat.ceil_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌉₊ = n := ceil_natCast n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_zero : ⌈a⌉₊ = 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by rw [← Nat.le_zero, ceil_le, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_eq_zero Nat.ceil_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_pos Nat.ceil_pos
theorem lt_of_ceil_lt (h : ⌈a⌉₊ < n) : a < n :=
(le_ceil a).trans_lt (Nat.cast_lt.2 h)
#align nat.lt_of_ceil_lt Nat.lt_of_ceil_lt
theorem le_of_ceil_le (h : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n) : a ≤ n :=
(le_ceil a).trans (Nat.cast_le.2 h)
#align nat.le_of_ceil_le Nat.le_of_ceil_le
theorem floor_le_ceil (a : α) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact cast_le.1 ((floor_le ha).trans <| le_ceil _)
#align nat.floor_le_ceil Nat.floor_le_ceil
theorem floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos {a b : α} (h : a < b) (h' : 0 < b) : ⌊a⌋₊ < ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 a with (ha | ha)
· rw [floor_lt ha]
exact h.trans_le (le_ceil _)
· rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha.le, lt_ceil, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos Nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos
theorem ceil_eq_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌈a⌉₊ = n ↔ ↑(n - 1) < a ∧ a ≤ n := by
rw [← ceil_le, ← not_le, ← ceil_le, not_le,
tsub_lt_iff_right (Nat.add_one_le_iff.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hn)), Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.ceil_eq_iff Nat.ceil_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ceil_zero : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iic 0 :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_ceil_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(↑(n - 1))`
theorem preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ioc (↑(n - 1) : α) n :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_iff hn
#align nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Intervals -/
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioo a b = Set.Ioo ⌊a⌋₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioo Nat.preimage_Ioo
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico {a b : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ico a b = Set.Ico ⌈a⌉₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Ico Nat.preimage_Ico
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioc a b = Set.Ioc ⌊a⌋₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, le_floor_iff, hb, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioc Nat.preimage_Ioc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc {a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Icc a b = Set.Icc ⌈a⌉₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, hb, le_floor_iff]
#align nat.preimage_Icc Nat.preimage_Icc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioi a = Set.Ioi ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioi Nat.preimage_Ioi
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ici a = Set.Ici ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le]
#align nat.preimage_Ici Nat.preimage_Ici
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iio a = Set.Iio ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Iio Nat.preimage_Iio
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iic a = Set.Iic ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [le_floor_iff, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Iic Nat.preimage_Iic
theorem floor_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by
rw [le_floor_iff (add_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg)]
obtain hb | hb := le_total n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_le_add_iff_right, add_le_add_iff_right,
le_floor_iff ha]
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_left_comm _ b, add_left_comm _ (b : α)]
refine iff_of_true ?_ le_self_add
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right <| ha.trans <| le_add_of_nonneg_right d.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_add_nat Nat.floor_add_nat
theorem floor_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a + 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_nat ha 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.floor_add_one Nat.floor_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat ha n
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
⌊a - n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - n := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha, floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le (ha.trans n.cast_nonneg)), zero_tsub]
rcases le_total a n with h | h
· rw [floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le h), eq_comm, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le]
exact Nat.cast_le.1 ((Nat.floor_le ha).trans h)
· rw [eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le (le_floor h), ← floor_add_nat _, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_left ((add_zero _).trans_le h)
#align nat.floor_sub_nat Nat.floor_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_one [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - 1 :=
mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by
rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, not_iff_not, lt_ceil]
obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_lt_add_iff_right, add_lt_add_iff_right,
lt_ceil]
· exact iff_of_true (lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt ha <| cast_lt.2 hb) (Nat.lt_add_left _ hb)
#align nat.ceil_add_nat Nat.ceil_add_nat
theorem ceil_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌈a + 1⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_nat ha 1`
rw [cast_one.symm, ceil_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.ceil_add_one Nat.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat ha n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : α) < a + 1 :=
lt_ceil.1 <| (Nat.lt_succ_self _).trans_le (ceil_add_one ha).ge
#align nat.ceil_lt_add_one Nat.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ + ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add]
exact _root_.add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align nat.ceil_add_le Nat.ceil_add_le
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋₊ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| lt_floor_add_one a
#align nat.sub_one_lt_floor Nat.sub_one_lt_floor
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [LinearOrderedSemifield α] [FloorSemiring α]
-- TODO: should these lemmas be `simp`? `norm_cast`?
theorem floor_div_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a / n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / n := by
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha
· rw [floor_of_nonpos, floor_of_nonpos ha]
· simp
apply div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· rw [cast_zero, div_zero, Nat.div_zero, floor_zero]
refine (floor_eq_iff ?_).2 ?_
· exact div_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
constructor
· exact cast_div_le.trans (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (floor_le ha) n.cast_nonneg)
rw [div_lt_iff, add_mul, one_mul, ← cast_mul, ← cast_add, ← floor_lt ha]
· exact lt_div_mul_add hn
· exact cast_pos.2 hn
#align nat.floor_div_nat Nat.floor_div_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_div_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a / (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_div_nat a n
/-- Natural division is the floor of field division. -/
theorem floor_div_eq_div (m n : ℕ) : ⌊(m : α) / n⌋₊ = m / n := by
convert floor_div_nat (m : α) n
rw [m.floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_div_eq_div Nat.floor_div_eq_div
end LinearOrderedSemifield
end Nat
/-- There exists at most one `FloorSemiring` structure on a linear ordered semiring. -/
theorem subsingleton_floorSemiring {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] :
Subsingleton (FloorSemiring α) := by
refine ⟨fun H₁ H₂ => ?_⟩
have : H₁.ceil = H₂.ceil := funext fun a => (H₁.gc_ceil.l_unique H₂.gc_ceil) fun n => rfl
have : H₁.floor = H₂.floor := by
ext a
cases' lt_or_le a 0 with h h
· rw [H₁.floor_of_neg, H₂.floor_of_neg] <;> exact h
· refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun n => ?_
rw [H₁.gc_floor, H₂.gc_floor] <;> exact h
cases H₁
cases H₂
congr
#align subsingleton_floor_semiring subsingleton_floorSemiring
/-! ### Floor rings -/
/-- A `FloorRing` is a linear ordered ring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℤ` satisfying `∀ (z : ℤ) (a : α), z ≤ floor a ↔ (z : α) ≤ a)`.
-/
class FloorRing (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] where
/-- `FloorRing.floor a` computes the greatest integer `z` such that `(z : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil a` computes the least integer `z` such that `a ≤ (z : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the upper adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_ring FloorRing
instance : FloorRing ℤ where
floor := id
ceil := id
gc_coe_floor a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil_coe a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `floor` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofFloor (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (floor : α → ℤ)
(gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor
ceil := fun a => -floor (-a)
gc_coe_floor
gc_ceil_coe := fun a z => by rw [neg_le, ← gc_coe_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff] }
#align floor_ring.of_floor FloorRing.ofFloor
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `ceil` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofCeil (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (ceil : α → ℤ)
(gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor := fun a => -ceil (-a)
ceil
gc_coe_floor := fun a z => by rw [le_neg, gc_ceil_coe, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
gc_ceil_coe }
#align floor_ring.of_ceil FloorRing.ofCeil
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α] {z : ℤ} {a : α}
/-- `Int.floor a` is the greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`. It is denoted with `⌊a⌋`. -/
def floor : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.floor
#align int.floor Int.floor
/-- `Int.ceil a` is the smallest integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`. It is denoted with `⌈a⌉`. -/
def ceil : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.ceil
#align int.ceil Int.ceil
/-- `Int.fract a`, the fractional part of `a`, is `a` minus its floor. -/
def fract (a : α) : α :=
a - floor a
#align int.fract Int.fract
@[simp]
theorem floor_int : (Int.floor : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.floor_int Int.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_int : (Int.ceil : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_int Int.ceil_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_int : (Int.fract : ℤ → ℤ) = 0 :=
funext fun x => by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_int Int.fract_int
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋" => Int.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉" => Int.ceil a
-- Mathematical notation for `fract a` is usually `{a}`. Let's not even go there.
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_floor_eq : @FloorRing.floor = @Int.floor :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_floor_eq Int.floorRing_floor_eq
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_ceil_eq : @FloorRing.ceil = @Int.ceil :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_ceil_eq Int.floorRing_ceil_eq
/-! #### Floor -/
theorem gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection ((↑) : ℤ → α) floor :=
FloorRing.gc_coe_floor
#align int.gc_coe_floor Int.gc_coe_floor
theorem le_floor : z ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ (z : α) ≤ a :=
(gc_coe_floor z a).symm
#align int.le_floor Int.le_floor
theorem floor_lt : ⌊a⌋ < z ↔ a < z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_floor
#align int.floor_lt Int.floor_lt
theorem floor_le (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a :=
gc_coe_floor.l_u_le a
#align int.floor_le Int.floor_le
theorem floor_nonneg : 0 ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ 0 ≤ a := by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_zero]
#align int.floor_nonneg Int.floor_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_sub_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ z - 1 ↔ a < z := by rw [← floor_lt, le_sub_one_iff]
#align int.floor_le_sub_one_iff Int.floor_le_sub_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_neg_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
rw [← zero_sub (1 : ℤ), floor_le_sub_one_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.floor_le_neg_one_iff Int.floor_le_neg_one_iff
theorem floor_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ 0 := by
rw [← @cast_le α, Int.cast_zero]
exact (floor_le a).trans ha
#align int.floor_nonpos Int.floor_nonpos
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋.succ :=
floor_lt.1 <| Int.lt_succ_self _
#align int.lt_succ_floor Int.lt_succ_floor
@[simp]
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
simpa only [Int.succ, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one] using lt_succ_floor a
#align int.lt_floor_add_one Int.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (lt_floor_add_one a)
#align int.sub_one_lt_floor Int.sub_one_lt_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌊(z : α)⌋ = z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_le]
#align int.floor_int_cast Int.floor_intCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.floor_nat_cast Int.floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_zero Int.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_one Int.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌋ = n :=
floor_natCast n
@[mono]
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℤ) :=
gc_coe_floor.monotone_u
#align int.floor_mono Int.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋ ≤ ⌊y⌋ := floor_mono
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor`
rw [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor, cast_one]
#align int.floor_pos Int.floor_pos
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a + z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub]
#align int.floor_add_int Int.floor_add_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌊a + 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_int a 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_one Int.floor_add_one
theorem le_floor_add (a b : α) : ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ ≤ ⌊a + b⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (floor_le _) (floor_le _)
#align int.le_floor_add Int.le_floor_add
theorem le_floor_add_floor (a b : α) : ⌊a + b⌋ - 1 ≤ ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ := by
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub, sub_le_comm, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
refine le_trans ?_ (sub_one_lt_floor _).le
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', ← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
exact floor_le _
#align int.le_floor_add_floor Int.le_floor_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_int_add (z : ℤ) (a : α) : ⌊↑z + a⌋ = z + ⌊a⌋ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using floor_add_int a z
#align int.floor_int_add Int.floor_int_add
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_nat Int.floor_add_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ⌊↑n + a⌋ = n + ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_int_add]
#align int.floor_nat_add Int.floor_nat_add
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a⌋ = OfNat.ofNat n + ⌊a⌋ :=
floor_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a - z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (floor_add_int _ _)
#align int.floor_sub_int Int.floor_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a - n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_sub_int]
#align int.floor_sub_nat Int.floor_sub_nat
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_one (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - 1 := mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing α] [FloorRing α]
{a b : α} (h : ⌊a⌋ = ⌊b⌋) : |a - b| < 1 := by
have : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one a
have : b < ⌊b⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one b
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) = ⌊b⌋ := Int.cast_inj.2 h
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a := floor_le a
have : (⌊b⌋ : α) ≤ b := floor_le b
exact abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor Int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor
theorem floor_eq_iff : ⌊a⌋ = z ↔ ↑z ≤ a ∧ a < z + 1 := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, le_floor, ← Int.lt_add_one_iff, floor_lt, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
and_comm]
#align int.floor_eq_iff Int.floor_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero_iff : ⌊a⌋ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ico (0 : α) 1 := by simp [floor_eq_iff]
#align int.floor_eq_zero_iff Int.floor_eq_zero_iff
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), ⌊a⌋ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
floor_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico Int.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), (⌊a⌋ : α) = n := fun a ha =>
congr_arg _ <| floor_eq_on_Ico n a ha
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico' Int.floor_eq_on_Ico'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_singleton (m : ℤ) : (floor : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ico (m : α) (m + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_floor_singleton Int.preimage_floor_singleton
/-! #### Fractional part -/
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_floor (a : α) : a - ⌊a⌋ = fract a :=
rfl
#align int.self_sub_floor Int.self_sub_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_fract (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) + fract a = a :=
add_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.floor_add_fract Int.floor_add_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_floor (a : α) : fract a + ⌊a⌋ = a :=
sub_add_cancel _ _
#align int.fract_add_floor Int.fract_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_int Int.fract_add_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_nat (a : α) (m : ℕ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_nat Int.fract_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_one (a : α) : fract (a + 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_add_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem fract_int_add (m : ℤ) (a : α) : fract (↑m + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_int]
#align int.fract_int_add Int.fract_int_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : fract (↑n + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_one_add (a : α) : fract (1 + a) = fract a := mod_cast fract_nat_add 1 a
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a) = fract a :=
fract_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a - m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_int Int.fract_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : fract (a - n) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_nat Int.fract_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_one (a : α) : fract (a - 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_sub_nat a n
-- Was a duplicate lemma under a bad name
#align int.fract_int_nat Int.fract_int_add
theorem fract_add_le (a b : α) : fract (a + b) ≤ fract a + fract b := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_le_sub_iff_left, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_le]
exact le_floor_add _ _
#align int.fract_add_le Int.fract_add_le
theorem fract_add_fract_le (a b : α) : fract a + fract b ≤ fract (a + b) + 1 := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact mod_cast le_floor_add_floor a b
#align int.fract_add_fract_le Int.fract_add_fract_le
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_fract (a : α) : a - fract a = ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.self_sub_fract Int.self_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_self (a : α) : fract a - a = -⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel_left _ _
#align int.fract_sub_self Int.fract_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ fract a :=
sub_nonneg.2 <| floor_le _
#align int.fract_nonneg Int.fract_nonneg
/-- The fractional part of `a` is positive if and only if `a ≠ ⌊a⌋`. -/
lemma fract_pos : 0 < fract a ↔ a ≠ ⌊a⌋ :=
(fract_nonneg a).lt_iff_ne.trans <| ne_comm.trans sub_ne_zero
#align int.fract_pos Int.fract_pos
theorem fract_lt_one (a : α) : fract a < 1 :=
sub_lt_comm.1 <| sub_one_lt_floor _
#align int.fract_lt_one Int.fract_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem fract_zero : fract (0 : α) = 0 := by rw [fract, floor_zero, cast_zero, sub_self]
#align int.fract_zero Int.fract_zero
@[simp]
theorem fract_one : fract (1 : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_one Int.fract_one
theorem abs_fract : |fract a| = fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| fract_nonneg a
#align int.abs_fract Int.abs_fract
@[simp]
theorem abs_one_sub_fract : |1 - fract a| = 1 - fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| sub_nonneg.mpr (fract_lt_one a).le
#align int.abs_one_sub_fract Int.abs_one_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_intCast (z : ℤ) : fract (z : α) = 0 := by
unfold fract
rw [floor_intCast]
exact sub_self _
#align int.fract_int_cast Int.fract_intCast
@[simp]
theorem fract_natCast (n : ℕ) : fract (n : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_nat_cast Int.fract_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) : α) = 0 :=
fract_natCast n
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem fract_floor (a : α) : fract (⌊a⌋ : α) = 0 :=
fract_intCast _
#align int.fract_floor Int.fract_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_fract (a : α) : ⌊fract a⌋ = 0 := by
rw [floor_eq_iff, Int.cast_zero, zero_add]; exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.floor_fract Int.floor_fract
theorem fract_eq_iff {a b : α} : fract a = b ↔ 0 ≤ b ∧ b < 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, ⟨⌊a⌋, sub_sub_cancel _ _⟩⟩,
by
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, z, hz⟩
rw [← self_sub_floor, eq_comm, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_comm, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, hz,
Int.cast_inj, floor_eq_iff, ← hz]
constructor <;> simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc] ⟩
#align int.fract_eq_iff Int.fract_eq_iff
theorem fract_eq_fract {a b : α} : fract a = fract b ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => ⟨⌊a⌋ - ⌊b⌋, by unfold fract at h; rw [Int.cast_sub, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub.1 h]⟩,
by
rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
refine fract_eq_iff.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, z + ⌊b⌋, ?_⟩
rw [eq_add_of_sub_eq hz, add_comm, Int.cast_add]
exact add_sub_sub_cancel _ _ _⟩
#align int.fract_eq_fract Int.fract_eq_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_eq_self {a : α} : fract a = a ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ a < 1 :=
fract_eq_iff.trans <| and_assoc.symm.trans <| and_iff_left ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align int.fract_eq_self Int.fract_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (a : α) : fract (fract a) = fract a :=
fract_eq_self.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.fract_fract Int.fract_fract
theorem fract_add (a b : α) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract (a + b) - fract a - fract b = z :=
⟨⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ - ⌊a + b⌋, by
unfold fract
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, cast_add, cast_neg]
abel⟩
#align int.fract_add Int.fract_add
theorem fract_neg {x : α} (hx : fract x ≠ 0) : fract (-x) = 1 - fract x := by
rw [fract_eq_iff]
constructor
· rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, zero_add]
exact (fract_lt_one x).le
refine ⟨sub_lt_self _ (lt_of_le_of_ne' (fract_nonneg x) hx), -⌊x⌋ - 1, ?_⟩
simp only [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, cast_sub, cast_neg, cast_one, sub_left_inj]
conv in -x => rw [← floor_add_fract x]
simp [-floor_add_fract]
#align int.fract_neg Int.fract_neg
@[simp]
theorem fract_neg_eq_zero {x : α} : fract (-x) = 0 ↔ fract x = 0 := by
simp only [fract_eq_iff, le_refl, zero_lt_one, tsub_zero, true_and_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ <;> use -z <;> simp [← hz]
#align int.fract_neg_eq_zero Int.fract_neg_eq_zero
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,086 | 1,094 | theorem fract_mul_nat (a : α) (b : ℕ) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract a * b - fract (a * b) = z := by |
induction' b with c hc
· use 0; simp
· rcases hc with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, mul_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
rcases fract_add (a * c) a with ⟨y, hy⟩
use z - y
rw [Int.cast_sub, ← hz, ← hy]
abel
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.lpSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.PiLp
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Bounded
#align_import analysis.normed_space.lp_equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6afc9b06856ad973f6a2619e3e8a0a8d537a58f2"
/-!
# Equivalences among $L^p$ spaces
In this file we collect a variety of equivalences among various $L^p$ spaces. In particular,
when `α` is a `Fintype`, given `E : α → Type u` and `p : ℝ≥0∞`, there is a natural linear isometric
equivalence `lpPiLpₗᵢₓ : lp E p ≃ₗᵢ PiLp p E`. In addition, when `α` is a discrete topological
space, the bounded continuous functions `α →ᵇ β` correspond exactly to `lp (fun _ ↦ β) ∞`.
Here there can be more structure, including ring and algebra structures,
and we implement these equivalences accordingly as well.
We keep this as a separate file so that the various $L^p$ space files don't import the others.
Recall that `PiLp` is just a type synonym for `Π i, E i` but given a different metric and norm
structure, although the topological, uniform and bornological structures coincide definitionally.
These structures are only defined on `PiLp` for `Fintype α`, so there are no issues of convergence
to consider.
While `PreLp` is also a type synonym for `Π i, E i`, it allows for infinite index types. On this
type there is a predicate `Memℓp` which says that the relevant `p`-norm is finite and `lp E p` is
the subtype of `PreLp` satisfying `Memℓp`.
## TODO
* Equivalence between `lp` and `MeasureTheory.Lp`, for `f : α → E` (i.e., functions rather than
pi-types) and the counting measure on `α`
-/
open scoped ENNReal
section LpPiLp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {α : Type*} {E : α → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section Finite
variable [Finite α]
/-- When `α` is `Finite`, every `f : PreLp E p` satisfies `Memℓp f p`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/LpEquiv.lean | 54 | 58 | theorem Memℓp.all (f : ∀ i, E i) : Memℓp f p := by |
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | _h)
· exact memℓp_zero_iff.mpr { i : α | f i ≠ 0 }.toFinite
· exact memℓp_infty_iff.mpr (Set.Finite.bddAbove (Set.range fun i : α ↦ ‖f i‖).toFinite)
· cases nonempty_fintype α; exact memℓp_gen ⟨Finset.univ.sum _, hasSum_fintype _⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.natural_ops from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
/-!
# Natural operations on ordinals
The goal of this file is to define natural addition and multiplication on ordinals, also known as
the Hessenberg sum and product, and provide a basic API. The natural addition of two ordinals
`a ♯ b` is recursively defined as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for `a' < a`
and `b' < b`. The natural multiplication `a ⨳ b` is likewise recursively defined as the least
ordinal such that `a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b'` for any `a' < a` and
`b' < b`.
These operations form a rich algebraic structure: they're commutative, associative, preserve order,
have the usual `0` and `1` from ordinals, and distribute over one another.
Moreover, these operations are the addition and multiplication of ordinals when viewed as
combinatorial `Game`s. This makes them particularly useful for game theory.
Finally, both operations admit simple, intuitive descriptions in terms of the Cantor normal form.
The natural addition of two ordinals corresponds to adding their Cantor normal forms as if they were
polynomials in `ω`. Likewise, their natural multiplication corresponds to multiplying the Cantor
normal forms as polynomials.
# Implementation notes
Given the rich algebraic structure of these two operations, we choose to create a type synonym
`NatOrdinal`, where we provide the appropriate instances. However, to avoid casting back and forth
between both types, we attempt to prove and state most results on `Ordinal`.
# Todo
- Prove the characterizations of natural addition and multiplication in terms of the Cantor normal
form.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u v
open Function Order
noncomputable section
/-! ### Basic casts between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal` -/
/-- A type synonym for ordinals with natural addition and multiplication. -/
def NatOrdinal : Type _ :=
-- Porting note: used to derive LinearOrder & SuccOrder but need to manually define
Ordinal deriving Zero, Inhabited, One, WellFoundedRelation
#align nat_ordinal NatOrdinal
instance NatOrdinal.linearOrder : LinearOrder NatOrdinal := {Ordinal.linearOrder with}
instance NatOrdinal.succOrder : SuccOrder NatOrdinal := {Ordinal.succOrder with}
/-- The identity function between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def Ordinal.toNatOrdinal : Ordinal ≃o NatOrdinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal Ordinal.toNatOrdinal
/-- The identity function between `NatOrdinal` and `Ordinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def NatOrdinal.toOrdinal : NatOrdinal ≃o Ordinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal NatOrdinal.toOrdinal
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_symm_eq : NatOrdinal.toOrdinal.symm = Ordinal.toNatOrdinal :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_symm_eq NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_symm_eq
-- Porting note: used to use dot notation, but doesn't work in Lean 4 with `OrderIso`
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_toNatOrdinal (a : NatOrdinal) :
Ordinal.toNatOrdinal (NatOrdinal.toOrdinal a) = a := rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_to_nat_ordinal NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_toNatOrdinal
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded NatOrdinal (· < ·) :=
Ordinal.lt_wf
#align nat_ordinal.lt_wf NatOrdinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedLT NatOrdinal :=
Ordinal.wellFoundedLT
instance : IsWellOrder NatOrdinal (· < ·) :=
Ordinal.isWellOrder
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_zero : toOrdinal 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_zero NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_one : toOrdinal 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_one NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_one
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_eq_zero (a) : toOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_eq_zero NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_eq_one (a) : toOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_eq_one NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_max : toOrdinal (max a b) = max (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_max NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_max
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_min : toOrdinal (min a b)= min (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_min NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_min
theorem succ_def (a : NatOrdinal) : succ a = toNatOrdinal (toOrdinal a + 1) :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.succ_def NatOrdinal.succ_def
/-- A recursor for `NatOrdinal`. Use as `induction x using NatOrdinal.rec`. -/
protected def rec {β : NatOrdinal → Sort*} (h : ∀ a, β (toNatOrdinal a)) : ∀ a, β a := fun a =>
h (toOrdinal a)
#align nat_ordinal.rec NatOrdinal.rec
/-- `Ordinal.induction` but for `NatOrdinal`. -/
theorem induction {p : NatOrdinal → Prop} : ∀ (i) (_ : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j), p i :=
Ordinal.induction
#align nat_ordinal.induction NatOrdinal.induction
end NatOrdinal
namespace Ordinal
variable {a b c : Ordinal.{u}}
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_symm_eq : toNatOrdinal.symm = NatOrdinal.toOrdinal :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_symm_eq Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_symm_eq
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_toOrdinal (a : Ordinal) : NatOrdinal.toOrdinal (toNatOrdinal a) = a :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_to_ordinal Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_toOrdinal
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_zero : toNatOrdinal 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_zero Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_one : toNatOrdinal 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_one Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_one
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_zero (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_eq_zero Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_one (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_eq_one Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_max (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (max a b) = max (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_max Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_max
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_min (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (linearOrder.min a b) = linearOrder.min (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_min Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_min
/-! We place the definitions of `nadd` and `nmul` before actually developing their API, as this
guarantees we only need to open the `NaturalOps` locale once. -/
/-- Natural addition on ordinals `a ♯ b`, also known as the Hessenberg sum, is recursively defined
as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for all `a' < a` and `b' < b`. In contrast
to normal ordinal addition, it is commutative.
Natural addition can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from adding up
corresponding coefficients in the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b`. -/
noncomputable def nadd : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal
| a, b =>
max (blsub.{u, u} a fun a' _ => nadd a' b) (blsub.{u, u} b fun b' _ => nadd a b')
termination_by o₁ o₂ => (o₁, o₂)
#align ordinal.nadd Ordinal.nadd
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:65 " ♯ " => Ordinal.nadd
open NaturalOps
/-- Natural multiplication on ordinals `a ⨳ b`, also known as the Hessenberg product, is recursively
defined as the least ordinal such that `a ⨳ b + a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b + a ⨳ b'` for all
`a' < a` and `b < b'`. In contrast to normal ordinal multiplication, it is commutative and
distributive (over natural addition).
Natural multiplication can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from multiplying
the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b` as if they were polynomials in `ω`. Addition of exponents is
done via natural addition. -/
noncomputable def nmul : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}
| a, b => sInf {c | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, nmul a' b ♯ nmul a b' < c ♯ nmul a' b'}
termination_by a b => (a, b)
#align ordinal.nmul Ordinal.nmul
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:70 " ⨳ " => Ordinal.nmul
/-! ### Natural addition -/
theorem nadd_def (a b : Ordinal) :
a ♯ b = max (blsub.{u, u} a fun a' _ => a' ♯ b) (blsub.{u, u} b fun b' _ => a ♯ b') := by
rw [nadd]
#align ordinal.nadd_def Ordinal.nadd_def
theorem lt_nadd_iff : a < b ♯ c ↔ (∃ b' < b, a ≤ b' ♯ c) ∨ ∃ c' < c, a ≤ b ♯ c' := by
rw [nadd_def]
simp [lt_blsub_iff]
#align ordinal.lt_nadd_iff Ordinal.lt_nadd_iff
theorem nadd_le_iff : b ♯ c ≤ a ↔ (∀ b' < b, b' ♯ c < a) ∧ ∀ c' < c, b ♯ c' < a := by
rw [nadd_def]
simp [blsub_le_iff]
#align ordinal.nadd_le_iff Ordinal.nadd_le_iff
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_left (h : b < c) (a) : a ♯ b < a ♯ c :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_left Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_left
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_right (h : b < c) (a) : b ♯ a < c ♯ a :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_right Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_right
theorem nadd_le_nadd_left (h : b ≤ c) (a) : a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_left h a).le
· exact le_rfl
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_left Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_left
theorem nadd_le_nadd_right (h : b ≤ c) (a) : b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_right h a).le
· exact le_rfl
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_right Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_right
variable (a b)
theorem nadd_comm : ∀ a b, a ♯ b = b ♯ a
| a, b => by
rw [nadd_def, nadd_def, max_comm]
congr <;> ext <;> apply nadd_comm
termination_by a b => (a,b)
#align ordinal.nadd_comm Ordinal.nadd_comm
theorem blsub_nadd_of_mono {f : ∀ c < a ♯ b, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) :
-- Porting note: needed to add universe hint blsub.{u,v} in the line below
blsub.{u,v} _ f =
max (blsub.{u, v} a fun a' ha' => f (a' ♯ b) <| nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b)
(blsub.{u, v} b fun b' hb' => f (a ♯ b') <| nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) := by
apply (blsub_le_iff.2 fun i h => _).antisymm (max_le _ _)
· intro i h
rcases lt_nadd_iff.1 h with (⟨a', ha', hi⟩ | ⟨b', hb', hi⟩)
· exact lt_max_of_lt_left ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ ha'))
· exact lt_max_of_lt_right ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ hb'))
all_goals
apply blsub_le_of_brange_subset.{u, u, v}
rintro c ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩
apply mem_brange_self
#align ordinal.blsub_nadd_of_mono Ordinal.blsub_nadd_of_mono
theorem nadd_assoc (a b c) : a ♯ b ♯ c = a ♯ (b ♯ c) := by
rw [nadd_def a (b ♯ c), nadd_def, blsub_nadd_of_mono, blsub_nadd_of_mono, max_assoc]
· congr <;> ext <;> apply nadd_assoc
· exact fun _ _ h => nadd_le_nadd_left h a
· exact fun _ _ h => nadd_le_nadd_right h c
termination_by (a, b, c)
#align ordinal.nadd_assoc Ordinal.nadd_assoc
@[simp]
theorem nadd_zero : a ♯ 0 = a := by
induction' a using Ordinal.induction with a IH
rw [nadd_def, blsub_zero, max_zero_right]
convert blsub_id a
rename_i hb
exact IH _ hb
#align ordinal.nadd_zero Ordinal.nadd_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_nadd : 0 ♯ a = a := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_zero]
#align ordinal.zero_nadd Ordinal.zero_nadd
@[simp]
theorem nadd_one : a ♯ 1 = succ a := by
induction' a using Ordinal.induction with a IH
rw [nadd_def, blsub_one, nadd_zero, max_eq_right_iff, blsub_le_iff]
intro i hi
rwa [IH i hi, succ_lt_succ_iff]
#align ordinal.nadd_one Ordinal.nadd_one
@[simp]
theorem one_nadd : 1 ♯ a = succ a := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_one]
#align ordinal.one_nadd Ordinal.one_nadd
theorem nadd_succ : a ♯ succ b = succ (a ♯ b) := by rw [← nadd_one (a ♯ b), nadd_assoc, nadd_one]
#align ordinal.nadd_succ Ordinal.nadd_succ
theorem succ_nadd : succ a ♯ b = succ (a ♯ b) := by rw [← one_nadd (a ♯ b), ← nadd_assoc, one_nadd]
#align ordinal.succ_nadd Ordinal.succ_nadd
@[simp]
theorem nadd_nat (n : ℕ) : a ♯ n = a + n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, nadd_succ, add_succ, hn]
#align ordinal.nadd_nat Ordinal.nadd_nat
@[simp]
theorem nat_nadd (n : ℕ) : ↑n ♯ a = a + n := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_nat]
#align ordinal.nat_nadd Ordinal.nat_nadd
theorem add_le_nadd : a + b ≤ a ♯ b := by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp
| H₂ c h =>
rwa [add_succ, nadd_succ, succ_le_succ_iff]
| H₃ c hc H =>
simp_rw [← IsNormal.blsub_eq.{u, u} (add_isNormal a) hc, blsub_le_iff]
exact fun i hi => (H i hi).trans_lt (nadd_lt_nadd_left hi a)
#align ordinal.add_le_nadd Ordinal.add_le_nadd
end Ordinal
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal NaturalOps
instance : Add NatOrdinal :=
⟨nadd⟩
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass NatOrdinal.{u} NatOrdinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _ _ h => nadd_lt_nadd_left h a⟩
#align nat_ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt NatOrdinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass NatOrdinal.{u} NatOrdinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a _ _ h => nadd_le_nadd_left h a⟩
#align nat_ordinal.add_covariant_class_le NatOrdinal.add_covariantClass_le
instance add_contravariantClass_le :
ContravariantClass NatOrdinal.{u} NatOrdinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c h => by
by_contra! h'
exact h.not_lt (add_lt_add_left h' a)⟩
#align nat_ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le NatOrdinal.add_contravariantClass_le
instance orderedCancelAddCommMonoid : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid NatOrdinal :=
{ NatOrdinal.linearOrder with
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := nadd_assoc
add_le_add_left := fun a b => add_le_add_left
le_of_add_le_add_left := fun a b c => le_of_add_le_add_left
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_nadd
add_zero := nadd_zero
add_comm := nadd_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec }
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne NatOrdinal :=
AddMonoidWithOne.unary
@[simp]
theorem add_one_eq_succ : ∀ a : NatOrdinal, a + 1 = succ a :=
nadd_one
#align nat_ordinal.add_one_eq_succ NatOrdinal.add_one_eq_succ
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_cast_nat (n : ℕ) : toOrdinal n = n := by
induction' n with n hn
· rfl
· change (toOrdinal n) ♯ 1 = n + 1
rw [hn]; exact nadd_one n
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_cast_nat NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_cast_nat
end NatOrdinal
open NatOrdinal
open NaturalOps
namespace Ordinal
theorem nadd_eq_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ♯ b = toOrdinal (toNatOrdinal a + toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nadd_eq_add Ordinal.nadd_eq_add
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_cast_nat (n : ℕ) : toNatOrdinal n = n := by
rw [← toOrdinal_cast_nat n]
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_cast_nat Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_cast_nat
theorem lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_left : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b < a ♯ c → b < c :=
@lt_of_add_lt_add_left NatOrdinal _ _ _
#align ordinal.lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_left Ordinal.lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_left
theorem lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_right : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a < c ♯ a → b < c :=
@lt_of_add_lt_add_right NatOrdinal _ _ _
#align ordinal.lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_right Ordinal.lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_right
theorem le_of_nadd_le_nadd_left : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c → b ≤ c :=
@le_of_add_le_add_left NatOrdinal _ _ _
#align ordinal.le_of_nadd_le_nadd_left Ordinal.le_of_nadd_le_nadd_left
theorem le_of_nadd_le_nadd_right : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a → b ≤ c :=
@le_of_add_le_add_right NatOrdinal _ _ _
#align ordinal.le_of_nadd_le_nadd_right Ordinal.le_of_nadd_le_nadd_right
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left : ∀ (a) {b c}, a ♯ b < a ♯ c ↔ b < c :=
@add_lt_add_iff_left NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right : ∀ (a) {b c}, b ♯ a < c ♯ a ↔ b < c :=
@add_lt_add_iff_right NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right
theorem nadd_le_nadd_iff_left : ∀ (a) {b c}, a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
@add_le_add_iff_left NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_iff_left Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_iff_left
theorem nadd_le_nadd_iff_right : ∀ (a) {b c}, b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a ↔ b ≤ c :=
@_root_.add_le_add_iff_right NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_iff_right Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_iff_right
theorem nadd_le_nadd : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a ♯ c ≤ b ♯ d :=
@add_le_add NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd
theorem nadd_lt_nadd : ∀ {a b c d}, a < b → c < d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le : ∀ {a b c d}, a < b → c ≤ d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c < d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt
theorem nadd_left_cancel : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = a ♯ c → b = c :=
@_root_.add_left_cancel NatOrdinal _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_left_cancel Ordinal.nadd_left_cancel
theorem nadd_right_cancel : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = c ♯ b → a = c :=
@_root_.add_right_cancel NatOrdinal _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_right_cancel Ordinal.nadd_right_cancel
theorem nadd_left_cancel_iff : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = a ♯ c ↔ b = c :=
@add_left_cancel_iff NatOrdinal _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_left_cancel_iff Ordinal.nadd_left_cancel_iff
theorem nadd_right_cancel_iff : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a = c ♯ a ↔ b = c :=
@add_right_cancel_iff NatOrdinal _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_right_cancel_iff Ordinal.nadd_right_cancel_iff
theorem le_nadd_self {a b} : a ≤ b ♯ a := by simpa using nadd_le_nadd_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
#align ordinal.le_nadd_self Ordinal.le_nadd_self
theorem le_nadd_left {a b c} (h : a ≤ c) : a ≤ b ♯ c :=
le_nadd_self.trans (nadd_le_nadd_left h b)
#align ordinal.le_nadd_left Ordinal.le_nadd_left
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/NaturalOps.lean | 494 | 494 | theorem le_self_nadd {a b} : a ≤ a ♯ b := by | simpa using nadd_le_nadd_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.LinearMap
/-!
# `map` and `comap` for `Submodule`s
## Main declarations
* `Submodule.map`: The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂`
* `Submodule.comap`: The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂`
* `Submodule.giMapComap`: `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective.
* `Submodule.gciMapComap`: `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective.
## Tags
submodule, subspace, linear map, pushforward, pullback
-/
open Function Pointwise Set
variable {R : Type*} {R₁ : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
namespace Submodule
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable (p p' : Submodule R M) (q q' : Submodule R₂ M₂)
variable {x : M}
section
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂` -/
def map (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
{ p.toAddSubmonoid.map f with
carrier := f '' p
smul_mem' := by
rintro c x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := σ₁₂.surjective c
exact ⟨_, p.smul_mem a hy, map_smulₛₗ f _ _⟩ }
#align submodule.map Submodule.map
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : (map f p : Set M₂) = f '' p :=
rfl
#align submodule.map_coe Submodule.map_coe
theorem map_toAddSubmonoid (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid.map (f : M →+ M₂) :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
#align submodule.map_to_add_submonoid Submodule.map_toAddSubmonoid
theorem map_toAddSubmonoid' (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
#align submodule.map_to_add_submonoid' Submodule.map_toAddSubmonoid'
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_map {A A₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [AddCommGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A) :
(AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule s).map f.toIntLinearMap =
AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MonoidHom.coe_toAdditive_map {G G₂ : Type*} [Group G] [Group G₂] (f : G →* G₂)
(s : Subgroup G) :
s.toAddSubgroup.map (MonoidHom.toAdditive f) = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toMultiplicative_map {G G₂ : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddGroup G₂]
(f : G →+ G₂) (s : AddSubgroup G) :
s.toSubgroup.map (AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f) = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {x : M₂} : x ∈ map f p ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ p ∧ f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_map Submodule.mem_map
theorem mem_map_of_mem {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {r} (h : r ∈ p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align submodule.mem_map_of_mem Submodule.mem_map_of_mem
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) {p : Submodule R M} (r : p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
mem_map_of_mem r.prop
#align submodule.apply_coe_mem_map Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) p = p :=
Submodule.ext fun a => by simp
#align submodule.map_id Submodule.map_id
theorem map_comp [RingHomSurjective σ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective σ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (p : Submodule R M) : map (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) p = map g (map f p) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp only [← image_comp, map_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp, comp_apply]
#align submodule.map_comp Submodule.map_comp
theorem map_mono {f : F} {p p' : Submodule R M} : p ≤ p' → map f p ≤ map f p' :=
image_subset _
#align submodule.map_mono Submodule.map_mono
@[simp]
theorem map_zero : map (0 : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) p = ⊥ :=
have : ∃ x : M, x ∈ p := ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩
ext <| by simp [this, eq_comm]
#align submodule.map_zero Submodule.map_zero
theorem map_add_le (f g : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) : map (f + g) p ≤ map f p ⊔ map g p := by
rintro x ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩
exact add_mem_sup (mem_map_of_mem hm) (mem_map_of_mem hm)
#align submodule.map_add_le Submodule.map_add_le
theorem map_inf_le (f : F) {p q : Submodule R M} :
(p ⊓ q).map f ≤ p.map f ⊓ q.map f :=
image_inter_subset f p q
theorem map_inf (f : F) {p q : Submodule R M} (hf : Injective f) :
(p ⊓ q).map f = p.map f ⊓ q.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_inter hf
theorem range_map_nonempty (N : Submodule R M) :
(Set.range (fun ϕ => Submodule.map ϕ N : (M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) → Submodule R₂ M₂)).Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.mem_range.mpr ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
#align submodule.range_map_nonempty Submodule.range_map_nonempty
end
section SemilinearMap
variable {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The pushforward of a submodule by an injective linear map is
linearly equivalent to the original submodule. See also `LinearEquiv.submoduleMap` for a
computable version when `f` has an explicit inverse. -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M) :
p ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] p.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f p i with
map_add' := by
intros
simp only [coe_add, map_add, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.Set.image_apply]
rfl
map_smul' := by
intros
-- Note: #8386 changed `map_smulₛₗ` into `map_smulₛₗ _`
simp only [coe_smul_of_tower, map_smulₛₗ _, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.Set.image_apply]
rfl }
#align submodule.equiv_map_of_injective Submodule.equivMapOfInjective
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M) (x : p) :
(equivMapOfInjective f i p x : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
#align submodule.coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply Submodule.coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply
@[simp]
theorem map_equivMapOfInjective_symm_apply (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M)
(x : p.map f) : f ((equivMapOfInjective f i p).symm x) = x := by
rw [← LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply (equivMapOfInjective f i p) x, coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply,
i.eq_iff, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂` -/
def comap (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : Submodule R M :=
{ p.toAddSubmonoid.comap f with
carrier := f ⁻¹' p
-- Note: #8386 added `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul_mem' := fun a x h => by simp [p.smul_mem (σ₁₂ a) h, map_smulₛₗ _] }
#align submodule.comap Submodule.comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_coe (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : (comap f p : Set M) = f ⁻¹' p :=
rfl
#align submodule.comap_coe Submodule.comap_coe
@[simp]
theorem AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_comap {A A₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [AddCommGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A₂) :
(AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule s).comap f.toIntLinearMap =
AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule (s.comap f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} : x ∈ comap f p ↔ f x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_comap Submodule.mem_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : comap (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) p = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
#align submodule.comap_id Submodule.comap_id
theorem comap_comp (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (p : Submodule R₃ M₃) :
comap (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) p = comap f (comap g p) :=
rfl
#align submodule.comap_comp Submodule.comap_comp
theorem comap_mono {f : F} {q q' : Submodule R₂ M₂} : q ≤ q' → comap f q ≤ comap f q' :=
preimage_mono
#align submodule.comap_mono Submodule.comap_mono
theorem le_comap_pow_of_le_comap (p : Submodule R M) {f : M →ₗ[R] M} (h : p ≤ p.comap f) (k : ℕ) :
p ≤ p.comap (f ^ k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp [LinearMap.one_eq_id]
· simp [LinearMap.iterate_succ, comap_comp, h.trans (comap_mono ih)]
#align submodule.le_comap_pow_of_le_comap Submodule.le_comap_pow_of_le_comap
section
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
map f p ≤ q ↔ p ≤ comap f q :=
image_subset_iff
#align submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap Submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)
| _, _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
#align submodule.gc_map_comap Submodule.gc_map_comap
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : F) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align submodule.map_bot Submodule.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem map_sup (f : F) : map f (p ⊔ p') = map f p ⊔ map f p' :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
#align submodule.map_sup Submodule.map_sup
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (p : ι → Submodule R M) :
map f (⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, map f (p i) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
#align submodule.map_supr Submodule.map_iSup
end
@[simp]
theorem comap_top (f : F) : comap f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align submodule.comap_top Submodule.comap_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_inf (f : F) : comap f (q ⊓ q') = comap f q ⊓ comap f q' :=
rfl
#align submodule.comap_inf Submodule.comap_inf
@[simp]
theorem comap_iInf [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (p : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
comap f (⨅ i, p i) = ⨅ i, comap f (p i) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
#align submodule.comap_infi Submodule.comap_iInf
@[simp]
theorem comap_zero : comap (0 : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) q = ⊤ :=
ext <| by simp
#align submodule.comap_zero Submodule.comap_zero
theorem map_comap_le [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (comap f q) ≤ q :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align submodule.map_comap_le Submodule.map_comap_le
theorem le_comap_map [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : p ≤ comap f (map f p) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align submodule.le_comap_map Submodule.le_comap_map
section GaloisInsertion
variable {f : F} (hf : Surjective f)
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂]
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective. -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisInsertion fun S x hx => by
rcases hf x with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_comap]
exact ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩
#align submodule.gi_map_comap Submodule.giMapComap
theorem map_comap_eq_of_surjective (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
(giMapComap hf).l_u_eq _
#align submodule.map_comap_eq_of_surjective Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_surjective
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Function.Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap hf).l_surjective
#align submodule.map_surjective_of_surjective Submodule.map_surjective_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Function.Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).u_injective
#align submodule.comap_injective_of_surjective Submodule.comap_injective_of_surjective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(p.comap f ⊔ q.comap f).map f = p ⊔ q :=
(giMapComap hf).l_sup_u _ _
#align submodule.map_sup_comap_of_surjective Submodule.map_sup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_sujective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(⨆ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iSup S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iSup_u _
#align submodule.map_supr_comap_of_sujective Submodule.map_iSup_comap_of_sujective
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(p.comap f ⊓ q.comap f).map f = p ⊓ q :=
(giMapComap hf).l_inf_u _ _
#align submodule.map_inf_comap_of_surjective Submodule.map_inf_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(⨅ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iInf S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iInf_u _
#align submodule.map_infi_comap_of_surjective Submodule.map_iInf_comap_of_surjective
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) : p.comap f ≤ q.comap f ↔ p ≤ q :=
(giMapComap hf).u_le_u_iff
#align submodule.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective Submodule.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective
theorem comap_strictMono_of_surjective : StrictMono (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).strictMono_u
#align submodule.comap_strict_mono_of_surjective Submodule.comap_strictMono_of_surjective
end GaloisInsertion
section GaloisCoinsertion
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F} (hf : Injective f)
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective. -/
def gciMapComap : GaloisCoinsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisCoinsertion fun S x => by
simp [mem_comap, mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro y hy hxy
rw [hf.eq_iff] at hxy
rwa [← hxy]
#align submodule.gci_map_comap Submodule.gciMapComap
theorem comap_map_eq_of_injective (p : Submodule R M) : (p.map f).comap f = p :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_l_eq _
#align submodule.comap_map_eq_of_injective Submodule.comap_map_eq_of_injective
theorem comap_surjective_of_injective : Function.Surjective (comap f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_surjective
#align submodule.comap_surjective_of_injective Submodule.comap_surjective_of_injective
theorem map_injective_of_injective : Function.Injective (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_injective
#align submodule.map_injective_of_injective Submodule.map_injective_of_injective
theorem comap_inf_map_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : (p.map f ⊓ q.map f).comap f = p ⊓ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_inf_l _ _
#align submodule.comap_inf_map_of_injective Submodule.comap_inf_map_of_injective
theorem comap_iInf_map_of_injective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R M) :
(⨅ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iInf S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iInf_l _
#align submodule.comap_infi_map_of_injective Submodule.comap_iInf_map_of_injective
theorem comap_sup_map_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : (p.map f ⊔ q.map f).comap f = p ⊔ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_sup_l _ _
#align submodule.comap_sup_map_of_injective Submodule.comap_sup_map_of_injective
theorem comap_iSup_map_of_injective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R M) :
(⨆ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iSup S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iSup_l _
#align submodule.comap_supr_map_of_injective Submodule.comap_iSup_map_of_injective
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : p.map f ≤ q.map f ↔ p ≤ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_le_l_iff
#align submodule.map_le_map_iff_of_injective Submodule.map_le_map_iff_of_injective
theorem map_strictMono_of_injective : StrictMono (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).strictMono_l
#align submodule.map_strict_mono_of_injective Submodule.map_strictMono_of_injective
end GaloisCoinsertion
end SemilinearMap
section OrderIso
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {F : Type*}
/-- A linear isomorphism induces an order isomorphism of submodules. -/
@[simps symm_apply apply]
def orderIsoMapComapOfBijective [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
(f : F) (hf : Bijective f) : Submodule R M ≃o Submodule R₂ M₂ where
toFun := map f
invFun := comap f
left_inv := comap_map_eq_of_injective hf.injective
right_inv := map_comap_eq_of_surjective hf.surjective
map_rel_iff' := map_le_map_iff_of_injective hf.injective _ _
/-- A linear isomorphism induces an order isomorphism of submodules. -/
@[simps! symm_apply apply]
def orderIsoMapComap [EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] (f : F) :
Submodule R M ≃o Submodule R₂ M₂ := orderIsoMapComapOfBijective f (EquivLike.bijective f)
#align submodule.order_iso_map_comap Submodule.orderIsoMapComap
end OrderIso
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
--TODO(Mario): is there a way to prove this from order properties?
theorem map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M}
{p' : Submodule R₂ M₂} : map f p ⊓ p' = map f (p ⊓ comap f p') :=
le_antisymm (by rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩)
(le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 inf_le_right))
#align submodule.map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap Submodule.map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_subtype : map p.subtype (comap p.subtype p') = p ⊓ p' :=
ext fun x => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩; exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩⟩
#align submodule.map_comap_subtype Submodule.map_comap_subtype
theorem eq_zero_of_bot_submodule : ∀ b : (⊥ : Submodule R M), b = 0
| ⟨b', hb⟩ => Subtype.eq <| show b' = 0 from (mem_bot R).1 hb
#align submodule.eq_zero_of_bot_submodule Submodule.eq_zero_of_bot_submodule
/-- The infimum of a family of invariant submodule of an endomorphism is also an invariant
submodule. -/
theorem _root_.LinearMap.iInf_invariant {σ : R →+* R} [RingHomSurjective σ] {ι : Sort*}
(f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M) {p : ι → Submodule R M} (hf : ∀ i, ∀ v ∈ p i, f v ∈ p i) :
∀ v ∈ iInf p, f v ∈ iInf p := by
have : ∀ i, (p i).map f ≤ p i := by
rintro i - ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact hf i v hv
suffices (iInf p).map f ≤ iInf p by exact fun v hv => this ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact le_iInf fun i => (Submodule.map_mono (iInf_le p i)).trans (this i)
#align linear_map.infi_invariant LinearMap.iInf_invariant
theorem disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot {p q : Submodule R M} : Disjoint p q ↔ comap p.subtype q = ⊥ := by
rw [← (map_injective_of_injective (show Injective p.subtype from Subtype.coe_injective)).eq_iff,
map_comap_subtype, map_bot, disjoint_iff]
#align submodule.disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot Submodule.disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (p : Submodule R M)
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map (-f) p = map f p :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ => hy ▸ ⟨-x, show -x ∈ p from neg_mem hx, map_neg f x⟩, fun ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ =>
hy ▸ ⟨-x, show -x ∈ p from neg_mem hx, (map_neg (-f) _).trans (neg_neg (f x))⟩⟩
#align submodule.map_neg Submodule.map_neg
@[simp]
lemma comap_neg {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : Submodule R M₂} :
p.comap (-f) = p.comap f := by
ext; simp
end AddCommGroup
end Submodule
namespace Submodule
variable {K : Type*} {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
variable [Semifield K]
variable [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
variable [AddCommMonoid V₂] [Module K V₂]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Map.lean | 478 | 480 | theorem comap_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.comap (a • f) = p.comap f := by |
ext b; simp only [Submodule.mem_comap, p.smul_mem_iff h, LinearMap.smul_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.arctan from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# The `arctan` function.
Inequalities, identities and `Real.tan` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)`
and the whole line.
The result of `arctan x + arctan y` is given by `arctan_add`, `arctan_add_eq_add_pi` or
`arctan_add_eq_sub_pi` depending on whether `x * y < 1` and `0 < x`. As an application of
`arctan_add` we give four Machin-like formulas (linear combinations of arctangents equal to
`π / 4 = arctan 1`), including John Machin's original one at
`four_mul_arctan_inv_5_sub_arctan_inv_239`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Real
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology Real
theorem tan_add {x y : ℝ}
(h : ((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_sub, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_div,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_tan] using
@Complex.tan_add (x : ℂ) (y : ℂ) (by convert h <;> norm_cast)
#align real.tan_add Real.tan_add
theorem tan_add' {x y : ℝ}
(h : (∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) :=
tan_add (Or.inl h)
#align real.tan_add' Real.tan_add'
theorem tan_two_mul {x : ℝ} : tan (2 * x) = 2 * tan x / (1 - tan x ^ 2) := by
have := @Complex.tan_two_mul x
norm_cast at *
#align real.tan_two_mul Real.tan_two_mul
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
#align real.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two Real.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two
theorem continuousOn_tan : ContinuousOn tan {x | cos x ≠ 0} := by
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x => sin x / cos x) {x | cos x ≠ 0} by
have h_eq : (fun x => sin x / cos x) = tan := by ext1 x; rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
rwa [h_eq] at this
exact continuousOn_sin.div continuousOn_cos fun x => id
#align real.continuous_on_tan Real.continuousOn_tan
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_tan : Continuous fun x : {x | cos x ≠ 0} => tan x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_tan
#align real.continuous_tan Real.continuous_tan
theorem continuousOn_tan_Ioo : ContinuousOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
refine ContinuousOn.mono continuousOn_tan fun x => ?_
simp only [and_imp, mem_Ioo, mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [cos_eq_zero_iff]
rintro hx_gt hx_lt ⟨r, hxr_eq⟩
rcases le_or_lt 0 r with h | h
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_lt
refine hx_lt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
simp [h]
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_gt
refine hx_gt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul,
mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
have hr_le : r ≤ -1 := by rwa [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right] at h
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, mul_comm, ← le_div_iff]
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
rw [← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg]; norm_cast
· exact zero_lt_two
#align real.continuous_on_tan_Ioo Real.continuousOn_tan_Ioo
theorem surjOn_tan : SurjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) univ :=
have := neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos
continuousOn_tan_Ioo.surjOn_of_tendsto (nonempty_Ioo.2 this)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atBot this]; exact tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atTop this]; exact tendsto_tan_pi_div_two)
#align real.surj_on_tan Real.surjOn_tan
theorem tan_surjective : Function.Surjective tan := fun _ => surjOn_tan.subset_range trivial
#align real.tan_surjective Real.tan_surjective
theorem image_tan_Ioo : tan '' Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) = univ :=
univ_subset_iff.1 surjOn_tan
#align real.image_tan_Ioo Real.image_tan_Ioo
/-- `Real.tan` as an `OrderIso` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)` and `ℝ`. -/
def tanOrderIso : Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o ℝ :=
(strictMonoOn_tan.orderIso _ _).trans <|
(OrderIso.setCongr _ _ image_tan_Ioo).trans OrderIso.Set.univ
#align real.tan_order_iso Real.tanOrderIso
/-- Inverse of the `tan` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 < arctan x` and
`arctan x < π / 2` -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def arctan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
tanOrderIso.symm x
#align real.arctan Real.arctan
@[simp]
theorem tan_arctan (x : ℝ) : tan (arctan x) = x :=
tanOrderIso.apply_symm_apply x
#align real.tan_arctan Real.tan_arctan
theorem arctan_mem_Ioo (x : ℝ) : arctan x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arctan_mem_Ioo Real.arctan_mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem range_arctan : range arctan = Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
((EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _).trans Subtype.range_coe
#align real.range_arctan Real.range_arctan
theorem arctan_tan {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : arctan (tan x) = x :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| tanOrderIso.symm_apply_apply ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.arctan_tan Real.arctan_tan
theorem cos_arctan_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < cos (arctan x) :=
cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x
#align real.cos_arctan_pos Real.cos_arctan_pos
theorem cos_sq_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) ^ 2 = 1 / (1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x).ne', tan_arctan]
#align real.cos_sq_arctan Real.cos_sq_arctan
theorem sin_arctan (x : ℝ) : sin (arctan x) = x / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [← tan_div_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
#align real.sin_arctan Real.sin_arctan
theorem cos_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) = 1 / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
#align real.cos_arctan Real.cos_arctan
theorem arctan_lt_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arctan x < π / 2 :=
(arctan_mem_Ioo x).2
#align real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) < arctan x :=
(arctan_mem_Ioo x).1
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan
theorem arctan_eq_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arctan x = arcsin (x / √(1 + x ^ 2)) :=
Eq.symm <| arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (sin_arctan x) (mem_Icc_of_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x)
#align real.arctan_eq_arcsin Real.arctan_eq_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_arctan {x : ℝ} (h : x ∈ Ioo (-(1 : ℝ)) 1) :
arcsin x = arctan (x / √(1 - x ^ 2)) := by
rw_mod_cast [arctan_eq_arcsin, div_pow, sq_sqrt, one_add_div, div_div, ← sqrt_mul,
mul_div_cancel₀, sub_add_cancel, sqrt_one, div_one] <;> simp at h <;> nlinarith [h.1, h.2]
#align real.arcsin_eq_arctan Real.arcsin_eq_arctan
@[simp]
theorem arctan_zero : arctan 0 = 0 := by simp [arctan_eq_arcsin]
#align real.arctan_zero Real.arctan_zero
@[mono]
theorem arctan_strictMono : StrictMono arctan := tanOrderIso.symm.strictMono
theorem arctan_injective : arctan.Injective := arctan_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem arctan_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arctan x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
.trans (by rw [arctan_zero]) arctan_injective.eq_iff
theorem tendsto_arctan_atTop : Tendsto arctan atTop (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) :=
tendsto_Ioo_atTop.mp tanOrderIso.symm.tendsto_atTop
theorem tendsto_arctan_atBot : Tendsto arctan atBot (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) :=
tendsto_Ioo_atBot.mp tanOrderIso.symm.tendsto_atBot
theorem arctan_eq_of_tan_eq {x y : ℝ} (h : tan x = y) (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arctan y = x :=
injOn_tan (arctan_mem_Ioo _) hx (by rw [tan_arctan, h])
#align real.arctan_eq_of_tan_eq Real.arctan_eq_of_tan_eq
@[simp]
theorem arctan_one : arctan 1 = π / 4 :=
arctan_eq_of_tan_eq tan_pi_div_four <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.arctan_one Real.arctan_one
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Arctan.lean | 198 | 198 | theorem arctan_neg (x : ℝ) : arctan (-x) = -arctan x := by | simp [arctan_eq_arcsin, neg_div]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
#align_import analysis.normed_space.exponential from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"62748956a1ece9b26b33243e2e3a2852176666f5"
/-!
# Exponential in a Banach algebra
In this file, we define `exp 𝕂 : 𝔸 → 𝔸`, the exponential map in a topological algebra `𝔸` over a
field `𝕂`.
While for most interesting results we need `𝔸` to be normed algebra, we do not require this in the
definition in order to make `exp` independent of a particular choice of norm. The definition also
does not require that `𝔸` be complete, but we need to assume it for most results.
We then prove some basic results, but we avoid importing derivatives here to minimize dependencies.
Results involving derivatives and comparisons with `Real.exp` and `Complex.exp` can be found in
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exponential`.
## Main results
We prove most result for an arbitrary field `𝕂`, and then specialize to `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`.
### General case
- `NormedSpace.exp_add_of_commute_of_mem_ball` : if `𝕂` has characteristic zero,
then given two commuting elements `x` and `y` in the disk of convergence, we have
`exp 𝕂 (x+y) = (exp 𝕂 x) * (exp 𝕂 y)`
- `NormedSpace.exp_add_of_mem_ball` : if `𝕂` has characteristic zero and `𝔸` is commutative,
then given two elements `x` and `y` in the disk of convergence, we have
`exp 𝕂 (x+y) = (exp 𝕂 x) * (exp 𝕂 y)`
- `NormedSpace.exp_neg_of_mem_ball` : if `𝕂` has characteristic zero and `𝔸` is a division ring,
then given an element `x` in the disk of convergence, we have `exp 𝕂 (-x) = (exp 𝕂 x)⁻¹`.
### `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`
- `expSeries_radius_eq_top` : the `FormalMultilinearSeries` defining `exp 𝕂` has infinite
radius of convergence
- `NormedSpace.exp_add_of_commute` : given two commuting elements `x` and `y`, we have
`exp 𝕂 (x+y) = (exp 𝕂 x) * (exp 𝕂 y)`
- `NormedSpace.exp_add` : if `𝔸` is commutative, then we have `exp 𝕂 (x+y) = (exp 𝕂 x) * (exp 𝕂 y)`
for any `x` and `y`
- `NormedSpace.exp_neg` : if `𝔸` is a division ring, then we have `exp 𝕂 (-x) = (exp 𝕂 x)⁻¹`.
- `exp_sum_of_commute` : the analogous result to `NormedSpace.exp_add_of_commute` for `Finset.sum`.
- `exp_sum` : the analogous result to `NormedSpace.exp_add` for `Finset.sum`.
- `NormedSpace.exp_nsmul` : repeated addition in the domain corresponds to
repeated multiplication in the codomain.
- `NormedSpace.exp_zsmul` : repeated addition in the domain corresponds to
repeated multiplication in the codomain.
### Other useful compatibility results
- `NormedSpace.exp_eq_exp` : if `𝔸` is a normed algebra over two fields `𝕂` and `𝕂'`,
then `exp 𝕂 = exp 𝕂' 𝔸`
### Notes
We put nearly all the statements in this file in the `NormedSpace` namespace,
to avoid collisions with the `Real` or `Complex` namespaces.
As of 2023-11-16 due to bad instances in Mathlib
```
import Mathlib
open Real
#time example (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x := exp_pos _ -- 250ms
#time example (x : ℝ) : 0 < Real.exp x := exp_pos _ -- 2ms
```
This is because `exp x` tries the `NormedSpace.exp` function defined here,
and generates a slow coercion search from `Real` to `Type`, to fit the first argument here.
We will resolve this slow coercion separately,
but we want to move `exp` out of the root namespace in any case to avoid this ambiguity.
In the long term is may be possible to replace `Real.exp` and `Complex.exp` with this one.
-/
namespace NormedSpace
open Filter RCLike ContinuousMultilinearMap NormedField Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ENNReal
section TopologicalAlgebra
variable (𝕂 𝔸 : Type*) [Field 𝕂] [Ring 𝔸] [Algebra 𝕂 𝔸] [TopologicalSpace 𝔸] [TopologicalRing 𝔸]
/-- `expSeries 𝕂 𝔸` is the `FormalMultilinearSeries` whose `n`-th term is the map
`(xᵢ) : 𝔸ⁿ ↦ (1/n! : 𝕂) • ∏ xᵢ`. Its sum is the exponential map `exp 𝕂 : 𝔸 → 𝔸`. -/
def expSeries : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕂 𝔸 𝔸 := fun n =>
(n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕂 n 𝔸
#align exp_series NormedSpace.expSeries
variable {𝔸}
/-- `exp 𝕂 : 𝔸 → 𝔸` is the exponential map determined by the action of `𝕂` on `𝔸`.
It is defined as the sum of the `FormalMultilinearSeries` `expSeries 𝕂 𝔸`.
Note that when `𝔸 = Matrix n n 𝕂`, this is the **Matrix Exponential**; see
[`Analysis.NormedSpace.MatrixExponential`](./MatrixExponential) for lemmas specific to that
case. -/
noncomputable def exp (x : 𝔸) : 𝔸 :=
(expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).sum x
#align exp NormedSpace.exp
variable {𝕂}
theorem expSeries_apply_eq (x : 𝔸) (n : ℕ) :
(expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x) = (n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n := by simp [expSeries]
#align exp_series_apply_eq NormedSpace.expSeries_apply_eq
theorem expSeries_apply_eq' (x : 𝔸) :
(fun n => expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x) = fun n => (n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n :=
funext (expSeries_apply_eq x)
#align exp_series_apply_eq' NormedSpace.expSeries_apply_eq'
theorem expSeries_sum_eq (x : 𝔸) : (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).sum x = ∑' n : ℕ, (n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n :=
tsum_congr fun n => expSeries_apply_eq x n
#align exp_series_sum_eq NormedSpace.expSeries_sum_eq
theorem exp_eq_tsum : exp 𝕂 = fun x : 𝔸 => ∑' n : ℕ, (n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n :=
funext expSeries_sum_eq
#align exp_eq_tsum NormedSpace.exp_eq_tsum
theorem expSeries_apply_zero (n : ℕ) :
(expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => (0 : 𝔸)) = Pi.single (f := fun _ => 𝔸) 0 1 n := by
rw [expSeries_apply_eq]
cases' n with n
· rw [pow_zero, Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one, inv_one, one_smul, Pi.single_eq_same]
· rw [zero_pow (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), smul_zero, Pi.single_eq_of_ne n.succ_ne_zero]
#align exp_series_apply_zero NormedSpace.expSeries_apply_zero
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 𝕂 (0 : 𝔸) = 1 := by
simp_rw [exp_eq_tsum, ← expSeries_apply_eq, expSeries_apply_zero, tsum_pi_single]
#align exp_zero NormedSpace.exp_zero
@[simp]
theorem exp_op [T2Space 𝔸] (x : 𝔸) : exp 𝕂 (MulOpposite.op x) = MulOpposite.op (exp 𝕂 x) := by
simp_rw [exp, expSeries_sum_eq, ← MulOpposite.op_pow, ← MulOpposite.op_smul, tsum_op]
#align exp_op NormedSpace.exp_op
@[simp]
theorem exp_unop [T2Space 𝔸] (x : 𝔸ᵐᵒᵖ) :
exp 𝕂 (MulOpposite.unop x) = MulOpposite.unop (exp 𝕂 x) := by
simp_rw [exp, expSeries_sum_eq, ← MulOpposite.unop_pow, ← MulOpposite.unop_smul, tsum_unop]
#align exp_unop NormedSpace.exp_unop
theorem star_exp [T2Space 𝔸] [StarRing 𝔸] [ContinuousStar 𝔸] (x : 𝔸) :
star (exp 𝕂 x) = exp 𝕂 (star x) := by
simp_rw [exp_eq_tsum, ← star_pow, ← star_inv_natCast_smul, ← tsum_star]
#align star_exp NormedSpace.star_exp
variable (𝕂)
theorem _root_.IsSelfAdjoint.exp [T2Space 𝔸] [StarRing 𝔸] [ContinuousStar 𝔸] {x : 𝔸}
(h : IsSelfAdjoint x) : IsSelfAdjoint (exp 𝕂 x) :=
(star_exp x).trans <| h.symm ▸ rfl
#align is_self_adjoint.exp IsSelfAdjoint.exp
theorem _root_.Commute.exp_right [T2Space 𝔸] {x y : 𝔸} (h : Commute x y) :
Commute x (exp 𝕂 y) := by
rw [exp_eq_tsum]
exact Commute.tsum_right x fun n => (h.pow_right n).smul_right _
#align commute.exp_right Commute.exp_right
theorem _root_.Commute.exp_left [T2Space 𝔸] {x y : 𝔸} (h : Commute x y) : Commute (exp 𝕂 x) y :=
(h.symm.exp_right 𝕂).symm
#align commute.exp_left Commute.exp_left
theorem _root_.Commute.exp [T2Space 𝔸] {x y : 𝔸} (h : Commute x y) : Commute (exp 𝕂 x) (exp 𝕂 y) :=
(h.exp_left _).exp_right _
#align commute.exp Commute.exp
end TopologicalAlgebra
section TopologicalDivisionAlgebra
variable {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [Field 𝕂] [DivisionRing 𝔸] [Algebra 𝕂 𝔸] [TopologicalSpace 𝔸]
[TopologicalRing 𝔸]
theorem expSeries_apply_eq_div (x : 𝔸) (n : ℕ) : (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x) = x ^ n / n ! := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← (Nat.cast_commute n ! (x ^ n)).inv_left₀.eq, ← smul_eq_mul,
expSeries_apply_eq, inv_natCast_smul_eq 𝕂 𝔸]
#align exp_series_apply_eq_div NormedSpace.expSeries_apply_eq_div
theorem expSeries_apply_eq_div' (x : 𝔸) :
(fun n => expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x) = fun n => x ^ n / n ! :=
funext (expSeries_apply_eq_div x)
#align exp_series_apply_eq_div' NormedSpace.expSeries_apply_eq_div'
theorem expSeries_sum_eq_div (x : 𝔸) : (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).sum x = ∑' n : ℕ, x ^ n / n ! :=
tsum_congr (expSeries_apply_eq_div x)
#align exp_series_sum_eq_div NormedSpace.expSeries_sum_eq_div
theorem exp_eq_tsum_div : exp 𝕂 = fun x : 𝔸 => ∑' n : ℕ, x ^ n / n ! :=
funext expSeries_sum_eq_div
#align exp_eq_tsum_div NormedSpace.exp_eq_tsum_div
end TopologicalDivisionAlgebra
section Normed
section AnyFieldAnyAlgebra
variable {𝕂 𝔸 𝔹 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕂]
variable [NormedRing 𝔸] [NormedRing 𝔹] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔹]
theorem norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
Summable fun n => ‖expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x‖ :=
(expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).summable_norm_apply hx
#align norm_exp_series_summable_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball
theorem norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball' (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
Summable fun n => ‖(n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n‖ := by
change Summable (norm ∘ _)
rw [← expSeries_apply_eq']
exact norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball x hx
#align norm_exp_series_summable_of_mem_ball' NormedSpace.norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball'
section CompleteAlgebra
variable [CompleteSpace 𝔸]
theorem expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
Summable fun n => expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x :=
(norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball x hx).of_norm
#align exp_series_summable_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball
theorem expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball' (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
Summable fun n => (n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n :=
(norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball' x hx).of_norm
#align exp_series_summable_of_mem_ball' NormedSpace.expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball'
theorem expSeries_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasSum (fun n => expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x) (exp 𝕂 x) :=
FormalMultilinearSeries.hasSum (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸) hx
#align exp_series_has_sum_exp_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.expSeries_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball
theorem expSeries_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball' (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasSum (fun n => (n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n) (exp 𝕂 x) := by
rw [← expSeries_apply_eq']
exact expSeries_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball x hx
#align exp_series_has_sum_exp_of_mem_ball' NormedSpace.expSeries_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball'
theorem hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_exp_of_radius_pos (h : 0 < (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (exp 𝕂) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸) 0 (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius :=
(expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).hasFPowerSeriesOnBall h
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball_exp_of_radius_pos NormedSpace.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_exp_of_radius_pos
theorem hasFPowerSeriesAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (h : 0 < (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (exp 𝕂) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸) 0 :=
(hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_exp_of_radius_pos h).hasFPowerSeriesAt
#align has_fpower_series_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos NormedSpace.hasFPowerSeriesAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos
theorem continuousOn_exp : ContinuousOn (exp 𝕂 : 𝔸 → 𝔸) (EMetric.ball 0 (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :=
FormalMultilinearSeries.continuousOn
#align continuous_on_exp NormedSpace.continuousOn_exp
theorem analyticAt_exp_of_mem_ball (x : 𝔸) (hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
AnalyticAt 𝕂 (exp 𝕂) x := by
by_cases h : (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius = 0
· rw [h] at hx; exact (ENNReal.not_lt_zero hx).elim
· have h := pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr h
exact (hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_exp_of_radius_pos h).analyticAt_of_mem hx
#align analytic_at_exp_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.analyticAt_exp_of_mem_ball
/-- In a Banach-algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` of characteristic zero, if `x` and `y` are
in the disk of convergence and commute, then `exp 𝕂 (x + y) = (exp 𝕂 x) * (exp 𝕂 y)`. -/
theorem exp_add_of_commute_of_mem_ball [CharZero 𝕂] {x y : 𝔸} (hxy : Commute x y)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius)
(hy : y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) : exp 𝕂 (x + y) = exp 𝕂 x * exp 𝕂 y := by
rw [exp_eq_tsum,
tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm
(norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball' x hx) (norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball' y hy)]
dsimp only
conv_lhs =>
congr
ext
rw [hxy.add_pow' _, Finset.smul_sum]
refine tsum_congr fun n => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun kl hkl => ?_
rw [nsmul_eq_smul_cast 𝕂, smul_smul, smul_mul_smul, ← Finset.mem_antidiagonal.mp hkl,
Nat.cast_add_choose, Finset.mem_antidiagonal.mp hkl]
congr 1
have : (n ! : 𝕂) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr n.factorial_ne_zero
field_simp [this]
#align exp_add_of_commute_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.exp_add_of_commute_of_mem_ball
/-- `exp 𝕂 x` has explicit two-sided inverse `exp 𝕂 (-x)`. -/
noncomputable def invertibleExpOfMemBall [CharZero 𝕂] {x : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) : Invertible (exp 𝕂 x) where
invOf := exp 𝕂 (-x)
invOf_mul_self := by
have hnx : -x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, ← neg_zero, edist_neg_neg]
exact hx
rw [← exp_add_of_commute_of_mem_ball (Commute.neg_left <| Commute.refl x) hnx hx, neg_add_self,
exp_zero]
mul_invOf_self := by
have hnx : -x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, ← neg_zero, edist_neg_neg]
exact hx
rw [← exp_add_of_commute_of_mem_ball (Commute.neg_right <| Commute.refl x) hx hnx, add_neg_self,
exp_zero]
#align invertible_exp_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.invertibleExpOfMemBall
theorem isUnit_exp_of_mem_ball [CharZero 𝕂] {x : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) : IsUnit (exp 𝕂 x) :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (invertibleExpOfMemBall hx)
#align is_unit_exp_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.isUnit_exp_of_mem_ball
theorem invOf_exp_of_mem_ball [CharZero 𝕂] {x : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) [Invertible (exp 𝕂 x)] :
⅟ (exp 𝕂 x) = exp 𝕂 (-x) := by
letI := invertibleExpOfMemBall hx; convert (rfl : ⅟ (exp 𝕂 x) = _)
#align inv_of_exp_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.invOf_exp_of_mem_ball
/-- Any continuous ring homomorphism commutes with `exp`. -/
theorem map_exp_of_mem_ball {F} [FunLike F 𝔸 𝔹] [RingHomClass F 𝔸 𝔹] (f : F) (hf : Continuous f)
(x : 𝔸) (hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
f (exp 𝕂 x) = exp 𝕂 (f x) := by
rw [exp_eq_tsum, exp_eq_tsum]
refine ((expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball' _ hx).hasSum.map f hf).tsum_eq.symm.trans ?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp_rw [map_inv_natCast_smul f 𝕂 𝕂, map_pow]
#align map_exp_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.map_exp_of_mem_ball
end CompleteAlgebra
theorem algebraMap_exp_comm_of_mem_ball [CompleteSpace 𝕂] (x : 𝕂)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝕂) (expSeries 𝕂 𝕂).radius) :
algebraMap 𝕂 𝔸 (exp 𝕂 x) = exp 𝕂 (algebraMap 𝕂 𝔸 x) :=
map_exp_of_mem_ball _ (continuous_algebraMap 𝕂 𝔸) _ hx
#align algebra_map_exp_comm_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.algebraMap_exp_comm_of_mem_ball
end AnyFieldAnyAlgebra
section AnyFieldDivisionAlgebra
variable {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕂] [NormedDivisionRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔸]
variable (𝕂)
theorem norm_expSeries_div_summable_of_mem_ball (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
Summable fun n => ‖x ^ n / (n ! : 𝔸)‖ := by
change Summable (norm ∘ _)
rw [← expSeries_apply_eq_div' (𝕂 := 𝕂) x]
exact norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball x hx
#align norm_exp_series_div_summable_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.norm_expSeries_div_summable_of_mem_ball
theorem expSeries_div_summable_of_mem_ball [CompleteSpace 𝔸] (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) : Summable fun n => x ^ n / n ! :=
(norm_expSeries_div_summable_of_mem_ball 𝕂 x hx).of_norm
#align exp_series_div_summable_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.expSeries_div_summable_of_mem_ball
theorem expSeries_div_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball [CompleteSpace 𝔸] (x : 𝔸)
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasSum (fun n => x ^ n / n !) (exp 𝕂 x) := by
rw [← expSeries_apply_eq_div' (𝕂 := 𝕂) x]
exact expSeries_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball x hx
#align exp_series_div_has_sum_exp_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.expSeries_div_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball
variable {𝕂}
theorem exp_neg_of_mem_ball [CharZero 𝕂] [CompleteSpace 𝔸] {x : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) : exp 𝕂 (-x) = (exp 𝕂 x)⁻¹ :=
letI := invertibleExpOfMemBall hx
invOf_eq_inv (exp 𝕂 x)
#align exp_neg_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.exp_neg_of_mem_ball
end AnyFieldDivisionAlgebra
section AnyFieldCommAlgebra
variable {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕂] [NormedCommRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔸]
[CompleteSpace 𝔸]
/-- In a commutative Banach-algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` of characteristic zero,
`exp 𝕂 (x+y) = (exp 𝕂 x) * (exp 𝕂 y)` for all `x`, `y` in the disk of convergence. -/
theorem exp_add_of_mem_ball [CharZero 𝕂] {x y : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius)
(hy : y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) : exp 𝕂 (x + y) = exp 𝕂 x * exp 𝕂 y :=
exp_add_of_commute_of_mem_ball (Commute.all x y) hx hy
#align exp_add_of_mem_ball NormedSpace.exp_add_of_mem_ball
end AnyFieldCommAlgebra
section RCLike
section AnyAlgebra
variable (𝕂 𝔸 𝔹 : Type*) [RCLike 𝕂] [NormedRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔸]
variable [NormedRing 𝔹] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔹]
/-- In a normed algebra `𝔸` over `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`, the series defining the exponential map
has an infinite radius of convergence. -/
theorem expSeries_radius_eq_top : (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius = ∞ := by
refine (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm fun r => ?_
refine .of_norm_bounded_eventually _ (Real.summable_pow_div_factorial r) ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_cofinite_ne 0] with n hn
rw [norm_mul, norm_norm (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n), expSeries]
rw [norm_smul (n ! : 𝕂)⁻¹ (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕂 n 𝔸)]
-- Porting note: Lean needed this to be explicit for some reason
rw [norm_inv, norm_pow, NNReal.norm_eq, norm_natCast, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
have : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕂 n 𝔸‖ ≤ 1 :=
norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_le_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (div_nonneg (pow_nonneg r.coe_nonneg n) n !.cast_nonneg) this
#align exp_series_radius_eq_top NormedSpace.expSeries_radius_eq_top
theorem expSeries_radius_pos : 0 < (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius := by
rw [expSeries_radius_eq_top]
exact WithTop.zero_lt_top
#align exp_series_radius_pos NormedSpace.expSeries_radius_pos
variable {𝕂 𝔸 𝔹}
theorem norm_expSeries_summable (x : 𝔸) : Summable fun n => ‖expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x‖ :=
norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball x ((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align norm_exp_series_summable NormedSpace.norm_expSeries_summable
theorem norm_expSeries_summable' (x : 𝔸) : Summable fun n => ‖(n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n‖ :=
norm_expSeries_summable_of_mem_ball' x ((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align norm_exp_series_summable' NormedSpace.norm_expSeries_summable'
section CompleteAlgebra
variable [CompleteSpace 𝔸]
theorem expSeries_summable (x : 𝔸) : Summable fun n => expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x :=
(norm_expSeries_summable x).of_norm
#align exp_series_summable NormedSpace.expSeries_summable
theorem expSeries_summable' (x : 𝔸) : Summable fun n => (n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n :=
(norm_expSeries_summable' x).of_norm
#align exp_series_summable' NormedSpace.expSeries_summable'
theorem expSeries_hasSum_exp (x : 𝔸) : HasSum (fun n => expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 n fun _ => x) (exp 𝕂 x) :=
expSeries_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball x ((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align exp_series_has_sum_exp NormedSpace.expSeries_hasSum_exp
theorem exp_series_hasSum_exp' (x : 𝔸) : HasSum (fun n => (n !⁻¹ : 𝕂) • x ^ n) (exp 𝕂 x) :=
expSeries_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball' x ((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align exp_series_has_sum_exp' NormedSpace.exp_series_hasSum_exp'
theorem exp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (exp 𝕂) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸) 0 ∞ :=
expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸 ▸ hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_exp_of_radius_pos (expSeries_radius_pos _ _)
#align exp_has_fpower_series_on_ball NormedSpace.exp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall
theorem exp_hasFPowerSeriesAt_zero : HasFPowerSeriesAt (exp 𝕂) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸) 0 :=
exp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesAt
#align exp_has_fpower_series_at_zero NormedSpace.exp_hasFPowerSeriesAt_zero
@[continuity]
theorem exp_continuous : Continuous (exp 𝕂 : 𝔸 → 𝔸) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ, ← Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (0 : 𝔸), ←
expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸]
exact continuousOn_exp
#align exp_continuous NormedSpace.exp_continuous
open Topology in
lemma _root_.Filter.Tendsto.exp {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f : α → 𝔸} {a : 𝔸}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp 𝕂 (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp 𝕂 a)) :=
(exp_continuous.tendsto _).comp hf
theorem exp_analytic (x : 𝔸) : AnalyticAt 𝕂 (exp 𝕂) x :=
analyticAt_exp_of_mem_ball x ((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align exp_analytic NormedSpace.exp_analytic
/-- In a Banach-algebra `𝔸` over `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`, if `x` and `y` commute, then
`exp 𝕂 (x+y) = (exp 𝕂 x) * (exp 𝕂 y)`. -/
theorem exp_add_of_commute {x y : 𝔸} (hxy : Commute x y) : exp 𝕂 (x + y) = exp 𝕂 x * exp 𝕂 y :=
exp_add_of_commute_of_mem_ball hxy ((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align exp_add_of_commute NormedSpace.exp_add_of_commute
section
variable (𝕂)
/-- `exp 𝕂 x` has explicit two-sided inverse `exp 𝕂 (-x)`. -/
noncomputable def invertibleExp (x : 𝔸) : Invertible (exp 𝕂 x) :=
invertibleExpOfMemBall <| (expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _
#align invertible_exp NormedSpace.invertibleExp
theorem isUnit_exp (x : 𝔸) : IsUnit (exp 𝕂 x) :=
isUnit_exp_of_mem_ball <| (expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _
#align is_unit_exp NormedSpace.isUnit_exp
theorem invOf_exp (x : 𝔸) [Invertible (exp 𝕂 x)] : ⅟ (exp 𝕂 x) = exp 𝕂 (-x) :=
invOf_exp_of_mem_ball <| (expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _
#align inv_of_exp NormedSpace.invOf_exp
theorem _root_.Ring.inverse_exp (x : 𝔸) : Ring.inverse (exp 𝕂 x) = exp 𝕂 (-x) :=
letI := invertibleExp 𝕂 x
Ring.inverse_invertible _
#align ring.inverse_exp Ring.inverse_exp
theorem exp_mem_unitary_of_mem_skewAdjoint [StarRing 𝔸] [ContinuousStar 𝔸] {x : 𝔸}
(h : x ∈ skewAdjoint 𝔸) : exp 𝕂 x ∈ unitary 𝔸 := by
rw [unitary.mem_iff, star_exp, skewAdjoint.mem_iff.mp h, ←
exp_add_of_commute (Commute.refl x).neg_left, ← exp_add_of_commute (Commute.refl x).neg_right,
add_left_neg, add_right_neg, exp_zero, and_self_iff]
#align exp_mem_unitary_of_mem_skew_adjoint NormedSpace.exp_mem_unitary_of_mem_skewAdjoint
end
/-- In a Banach-algebra `𝔸` over `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`, if a family of elements `f i` mutually
commute then `exp 𝕂 (∑ i, f i) = ∏ i, exp 𝕂 (f i)`. -/
theorem exp_sum_of_commute {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → 𝔸)
(h : (s : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j => Commute (f i) (f j)) :
exp 𝕂 (∑ i ∈ s, f i) =
s.noncommProd (fun i => exp 𝕂 (f i)) fun i hi j hj _ => (h.of_refl hi hj).exp 𝕂 := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s ha ih
· simp
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ ha, Finset.sum_insert ha, exp_add_of_commute,
ih (h.mono <| Finset.subset_insert _ _)]
refine Commute.sum_right _ _ _ fun i hi => ?_
exact h.of_refl (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _) (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
#align exp_sum_of_commute NormedSpace.exp_sum_of_commute
theorem exp_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : 𝔸) : exp 𝕂 (n • x) = exp 𝕂 x ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [zero_smul, pow_zero, exp_zero]
· rw [succ_nsmul, pow_succ, exp_add_of_commute ((Commute.refl x).smul_left n), ih]
#align exp_nsmul NormedSpace.exp_nsmul
variable (𝕂)
/-- Any continuous ring homomorphism commutes with `NormedSpace.exp`. -/
theorem map_exp {F} [FunLike F 𝔸 𝔹] [RingHomClass F 𝔸 𝔹] (f : F) (hf : Continuous f) (x : 𝔸) :
f (exp 𝕂 x) = exp 𝕂 (f x) :=
map_exp_of_mem_ball f hf x <| (expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _
#align map_exp NormedSpace.map_exp
theorem exp_smul {G} [Monoid G] [MulSemiringAction G 𝔸] [ContinuousConstSMul G 𝔸] (g : G) (x : 𝔸) :
exp 𝕂 (g • x) = g • exp 𝕂 x :=
(map_exp 𝕂 (MulSemiringAction.toRingHom G 𝔸 g) (continuous_const_smul g) x).symm
#align exp_smul NormedSpace.exp_smul
theorem exp_units_conj (y : 𝔸ˣ) (x : 𝔸) : exp 𝕂 (y * x * ↑y⁻¹ : 𝔸) = y * exp 𝕂 x * ↑y⁻¹ :=
exp_smul _ (ConjAct.toConjAct y) x
#align exp_units_conj NormedSpace.exp_units_conj
theorem exp_units_conj' (y : 𝔸ˣ) (x : 𝔸) : exp 𝕂 (↑y⁻¹ * x * y) = ↑y⁻¹ * exp 𝕂 x * y :=
exp_units_conj _ _ _
#align exp_units_conj' NormedSpace.exp_units_conj'
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_exp [CompleteSpace 𝔹] (x : 𝔸 × 𝔹) : (exp 𝕂 x).fst = exp 𝕂 x.fst :=
map_exp _ (RingHom.fst 𝔸 𝔹) continuous_fst x
#align prod.fst_exp Prod.fst_exp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_exp [CompleteSpace 𝔹] (x : 𝔸 × 𝔹) : (exp 𝕂 x).snd = exp 𝕂 x.snd :=
map_exp _ (RingHom.snd 𝔸 𝔹) continuous_snd x
#align prod.snd_exp Prod.snd_exp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Pi.exp_apply {ι : Type*} {𝔸 : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [∀ i, NormedRing (𝔸 i)]
[∀ i, NormedAlgebra 𝕂 (𝔸 i)] [∀ i, CompleteSpace (𝔸 i)] (x : ∀ i, 𝔸 i) (i : ι) :
exp 𝕂 x i = exp 𝕂 (x i) :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_fintype ι
map_exp _ (Pi.evalRingHom 𝔸 i) (continuous_apply _) x
#align pi.exp_apply Pi.exp_apply
theorem _root_.Pi.exp_def {ι : Type*} {𝔸 : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [∀ i, NormedRing (𝔸 i)]
[∀ i, NormedAlgebra 𝕂 (𝔸 i)] [∀ i, CompleteSpace (𝔸 i)] (x : ∀ i, 𝔸 i) :
exp 𝕂 x = fun i => exp 𝕂 (x i) :=
funext <| Pi.exp_apply 𝕂 x
#align pi.exp_def Pi.exp_def
theorem _root_.Function.update_exp {ι : Type*} {𝔸 : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [DecidableEq ι]
[∀ i, NormedRing (𝔸 i)] [∀ i, NormedAlgebra 𝕂 (𝔸 i)] [∀ i, CompleteSpace (𝔸 i)] (x : ∀ i, 𝔸 i)
(j : ι) (xj : 𝔸 j) :
Function.update (exp 𝕂 x) j (exp 𝕂 xj) = exp 𝕂 (Function.update x j xj) := by
ext i
simp_rw [Pi.exp_def]
exact (Function.apply_update (fun i => exp 𝕂) x j xj i).symm
#align function.update_exp Function.update_exp
end CompleteAlgebra
theorem algebraMap_exp_comm (x : 𝕂) : algebraMap 𝕂 𝔸 (exp 𝕂 x) = exp 𝕂 (algebraMap 𝕂 𝔸 x) :=
algebraMap_exp_comm_of_mem_ball x <| (expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝕂).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _
#align algebra_map_exp_comm NormedSpace.algebraMap_exp_comm
end AnyAlgebra
section DivisionAlgebra
variable {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕂] [NormedDivisionRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔸]
variable (𝕂)
theorem norm_expSeries_div_summable (x : 𝔸) : Summable fun n => ‖(x ^ n / n ! : 𝔸)‖ :=
norm_expSeries_div_summable_of_mem_ball 𝕂 x
((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align norm_exp_series_div_summable NormedSpace.norm_expSeries_div_summable
variable [CompleteSpace 𝔸]
theorem expSeries_div_summable (x : 𝔸) : Summable fun n => x ^ n / n ! :=
(norm_expSeries_div_summable 𝕂 x).of_norm
#align exp_series_div_summable NormedSpace.expSeries_div_summable
theorem expSeries_div_hasSum_exp (x : 𝔸) : HasSum (fun n => x ^ n / n !) (exp 𝕂 x) :=
expSeries_div_hasSum_exp_of_mem_ball 𝕂 x ((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align exp_series_div_has_sum_exp NormedSpace.expSeries_div_hasSum_exp
variable {𝕂}
theorem exp_neg (x : 𝔸) : exp 𝕂 (-x) = (exp 𝕂 x)⁻¹ :=
exp_neg_of_mem_ball <| (expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _
#align exp_neg NormedSpace.exp_neg
theorem exp_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : 𝔸) : exp 𝕂 (z • x) = exp 𝕂 x ^ z := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := z.eq_nat_or_neg
· rw [zpow_natCast, natCast_zsmul, exp_nsmul]
· rw [zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, neg_smul, exp_neg, natCast_zsmul, exp_nsmul]
#align exp_zsmul NormedSpace.exp_zsmul
theorem exp_conj (y : 𝔸) (x : 𝔸) (hy : y ≠ 0) : exp 𝕂 (y * x * y⁻¹) = y * exp 𝕂 x * y⁻¹ :=
exp_units_conj _ (Units.mk0 y hy) x
#align exp_conj NormedSpace.exp_conj
theorem exp_conj' (y : 𝔸) (x : 𝔸) (hy : y ≠ 0) : exp 𝕂 (y⁻¹ * x * y) = y⁻¹ * exp 𝕂 x * y :=
exp_units_conj' _ (Units.mk0 y hy) x
#align exp_conj' NormedSpace.exp_conj'
end DivisionAlgebra
section CommAlgebra
variable {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕂] [NormedCommRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔸] [CompleteSpace 𝔸]
/-- In a commutative Banach-algebra `𝔸` over `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`,
`exp 𝕂 (x+y) = (exp 𝕂 x) * (exp 𝕂 y)`. -/
theorem exp_add {x y : 𝔸} : exp 𝕂 (x + y) = exp 𝕂 x * exp 𝕂 y :=
exp_add_of_mem_ball ((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
((expSeries_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
#align exp_add NormedSpace.exp_add
/-- A version of `NormedSpace.exp_sum_of_commute` for a commutative Banach-algebra. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Exponential.lean | 662 | 664 | theorem exp_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → 𝔸) : exp 𝕂 (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, exp 𝕂 (f i) := by |
rw [exp_sum_of_commute, Finset.noncommProd_eq_prod]
exact fun i _hi j _hj _ => Commute.all _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
#align_import data.analysis.filter from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Computational realization of filters (experimental)
This file provides infrastructure to compute with filters.
## Main declarations
* `CFilter`: Realization of a filter base. Note that this is in the generality of filters on
lattices, while `Filter` is filters of sets (so corresponding to `CFilter (Set α) σ`).
* `Filter.Realizer`: Realization of a `Filter`. `CFilter` that generates the given filter.
-/
open Set Filter
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO write doc strings
/-- A `CFilter α σ` is a realization of a filter (base) on `α`,
represented by a type `σ` together with operations for the top element and
the binary `inf` operation. -/
structure CFilter (α σ : Type*) [PartialOrder α] where
f : σ → α
pt : σ
inf : σ → σ → σ
inf_le_left : ∀ a b : σ, f (inf a b) ≤ f a
inf_le_right : ∀ a b : σ, f (inf a b) ≤ f b
#align cfilter CFilter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*}
instance [Inhabited α] [SemilatticeInf α] : Inhabited (CFilter α α) :=
⟨{ f := id
pt := default
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ ↦ inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ ↦ inf_le_right }⟩
namespace CFilter
section
variable [PartialOrder α] (F : CFilter α σ)
instance : CoeFun (CFilter α σ) fun _ ↦ σ → α :=
⟨CFilter.f⟩
/- Porting note: Due to the CoeFun instance, the lhs of this lemma has a variable (f) as its head
symbol (simpnf linter problem). Replacing it with a DFunLike instance would not be mathematically
meaningful here, since the coercion to f cannot be injective, hence need to remove @[simp]. -/
-- @[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f pt inf h₁ h₂ a) : (@CFilter.mk α σ _ f pt inf h₁ h₂) a = f a :=
rfl
#align cfilter.coe_mk CFilter.coe_mk
/-- Map a `CFilter` to an equivalent representation type. -/
def ofEquiv (E : σ ≃ τ) : CFilter α σ → CFilter α τ
| ⟨f, p, g, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
{ f := fun a ↦ f (E.symm a)
pt := E p
inf := fun a b ↦ E (g (E.symm a) (E.symm b))
inf_le_left := fun a b ↦ by simpa using h₁ (E.symm a) (E.symm b)
inf_le_right := fun a b ↦ by simpa using h₂ (E.symm a) (E.symm b) }
#align cfilter.of_equiv CFilter.ofEquiv
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Analysis/Filter.lean | 74 | 75 | theorem ofEquiv_val (E : σ ≃ τ) (F : CFilter α σ) (a : τ) : F.ofEquiv E a = F (E.symm a) := by |
cases F; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.Order.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8ea5598db6caeddde6cb734aa179cc2408dbd345"
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r o h`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.lift.initialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.lift.principalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. This definition is universe polymorphic:
`Ordinal.omega.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in a specific
universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module
assert_not_exists Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Well order on an arbitrary type -/
section WellOrderingThm
-- Porting note: `parameter` does not work
-- parameter {σ : Type u}
variable {σ : Type u}
open Function
theorem nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal : Nonempty (σ ↪ Cardinal.{u}) :=
(Embedding.total _ _).resolve_left fun ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ =>
let g : σ → Cardinal.{u} := invFun f
let ⟨x, (hx : g x = 2 ^ sum g)⟩ := invFun_surjective hf (2 ^ sum g)
have : g x ≤ sum g := le_sum.{u, u} g x
not_le_of_gt (by rw [hx]; exact cantor _) this
#align nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal
/-- An embedding of any type to the set of cardinals. -/
def embeddingToCardinal : σ ↪ Cardinal.{u} :=
Classical.choice nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal
#align embedding_to_cardinal embeddingToCardinal
/-- Any type can be endowed with a well order, obtained by pulling back the well order over
cardinals by some embedding. -/
def WellOrderingRel : σ → σ → Prop :=
embeddingToCardinal ⁻¹'o (· < ·)
#align well_ordering_rel WellOrderingRel
instance WellOrderingRel.isWellOrder : IsWellOrder σ WellOrderingRel :=
(RelEmbedding.preimage _ _).isWellOrder
#align well_ordering_rel.is_well_order WellOrderingRel.isWellOrder
instance IsWellOrder.subtype_nonempty : Nonempty { r // IsWellOrder σ r } :=
⟨⟨WellOrderingRel, inferInstance⟩⟩
#align is_well_order.subtype_nonempty IsWellOrder.subtype_nonempty
end WellOrderingThm
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Well_order WellOrder
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (o : WellOrder) : mk o.α o.r o.wo = o := by
cases o
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Well_order.eta WellOrder.eta
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_equivalent Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
#align ordinal Ordinal
instance hasWellFoundedOut (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.out.α :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
#align has_well_founded_out hasWellFoundedOut
instance linearOrderOut (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.out.α :=
IsWellOrder.linearOrder o.out.r
#align linear_order_out linearOrderOut
instance isWellOrder_out_lt (o : Ordinal) : IsWellOrder o.out.α (· < ·) :=
o.out.wo
#align is_well_order_out_lt isWellOrder_out_lt
namespace Ordinal
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
#align ordinal.type Ordinal.type
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order. For the embedding as a principal segment, see
`typein.principalSeg`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : Ordinal :=
type (Subrel r { b | r b a })
#align ordinal.typein Ordinal.typein
@[simp]
theorem type_def' (w : WellOrder) : ⟦w⟧ = type w.r := by
cases w
rfl
#align ordinal.type_def' Ordinal.type_def'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem type_def (r) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : (⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧ : Ordinal) = type r := by
rfl
#align ordinal.type_def Ordinal.type_def
@[simp]
theorem type_out (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal.type o.out.r = o := by
rw [Ordinal.type, WellOrder.eta, Quotient.out_eq]
#align ordinal.type_out Ordinal.type_out
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
#align ordinal.type_eq Ordinal.type_eq
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
#align rel_iso.ordinal_type_eq RelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lt (o : Ordinal) : type ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop) = o :=
(type_def' _).symm.trans <| Quotient.out_eq o
#align ordinal.type_lt Ordinal.type_lt
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_eq_zero_of_empty Ordinal.type_eq_zero_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
#align ordinal.type_eq_zero_iff_is_empty Ordinal.type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
#align ordinal.type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty Ordinal.type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
#align ordinal.type_ne_zero_of_nonempty Ordinal.type_ne_zero_of_nonempty
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_pempty Ordinal.type_pEmpty
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
#align ordinal.type_empty Ordinal.type_empty
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Unique α] : type r = 1 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_eq_one_of_unique Ordinal.type_eq_one_of_unique
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => @type_eq_one_of_unique α r _ h⟩
#align ordinal.type_eq_one_iff_unique Ordinal.type_eq_one_iff_unique
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_punit Ordinal.type_pUnit
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_unit Ordinal.type_unit
@[simp]
theorem out_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.out.α ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.out.α (· < ·), type_lt]
#align ordinal.out_empty_iff_eq_zero Ordinal.out_empty_iff_eq_zero
theorem eq_zero_of_out_empty (o : Ordinal) [h : IsEmpty o.out.α] : o = 0 :=
out_empty_iff_eq_zero.1 h
#align ordinal.eq_zero_of_out_empty Ordinal.eq_zero_of_out_empty
instance isEmpty_out_zero : IsEmpty (0 : Ordinal).out.α :=
out_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
#align ordinal.is_empty_out_zero Ordinal.isEmpty_out_zero
@[simp]
theorem out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.out.α ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.out.α (· < ·), type_lt]
#align ordinal.out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero Ordinal.out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_out_nonempty (o : Ordinal) [h : Nonempty o.out.α] : o ≠ 0 :=
out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.1 h
#align ordinal.ne_zero_of_out_nonempty Ordinal.ne_zero_of_out_nonempty
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
#align ordinal.one_ne_zero Ordinal.one_ne_zero
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
--@[simp] -- Porting note: not in simp nf, added aux lemma below
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_preimage Ordinal.type_preimage
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- `simpNF` incorrectly complains the LHS doesn't simplify.
theorem type_preimage_aux {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
@type _ (fun x y => r (f x) (f y)) (inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder β (↑f ⁻¹'o r))) = type r := by
convert (RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
#align ordinal.induction_on Ordinal.inductionOn
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨(InitialSeg.ofIso f.symm).trans <| h.trans (InitialSeg.ofIso g)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨(InitialSeg.ofIso f).trans <| h.trans (InitialSeg.ofIso g.symm)⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.equivLT f.symm <| h.ltLe (InitialSeg.ofIso g)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨PrincipalSeg.equivLT f <| h.ltLe (InitialSeg.ofIso g.symm)⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.ltLe g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
Sum.recOn f.ltOrEq (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨InitialSeg.ofIso g.symm⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.type_le_iff Ordinal.type_le_iff
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
#align ordinal.type_le_iff' Ordinal.type_le_iff'
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
#align initial_seg.ordinal_type_le InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
#align rel_embedding.ordinal_type_le RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le
@[simp]
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.type_lt_iff Ordinal.type_lt_iff
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
#align principal_seg.ordinal_type_lt PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
#align ordinal.zero_le Ordinal.zero_le
instance orderBot : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.bot_eq_zero Ordinal.bot_eq_zero
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
#align ordinal.le_zero Ordinal.le_zero
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
#align ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
#align ordinal.not_lt_zero Ordinal.not_lt_zero
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
#align ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos
instance zeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance NeZero.one : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
#align ordinal.ne_zero.one Ordinal.NeZero.one
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegOut α β` is the initial segment embedding
of `α` to `β`, as map from a model type for `α` to a model type for `β`. -/
def initialSegOut {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) :
InitialSeg ((· < ·) : α.out.α → α.out.α → Prop) ((· < ·) : β.out.α → β.out.α → Prop) := by
change α.out.r ≼i β.out.r
rw [← Quotient.out_eq α, ← Quotient.out_eq β] at h; revert h
cases Quotient.out α; cases Quotient.out β; exact Classical.choice
#align ordinal.initial_seg_out Ordinal.initialSegOut
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegOut α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α` to `β`, as map from a model type for `α` to a model type for `β`. -/
def principalSegOut {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) :
PrincipalSeg ((· < ·) : α.out.α → α.out.α → Prop) ((· < ·) : β.out.α → β.out.α → Prop) := by
change α.out.r ≺i β.out.r
rw [← Quotient.out_eq α, ← Quotient.out_eq β] at h; revert h
cases Quotient.out α; cases Quotient.out β; exact Classical.choice
#align ordinal.principal_seg_out Ordinal.principalSegOut
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
⟨PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _⟩
#align ordinal.typein_lt_type Ordinal.typein_lt_type
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.out.α) :
@typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_lt o]
apply typein_lt_type
#align ordinal.typein_lt_self Ordinal.typein_lt_self
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
Eq.symm <|
Quot.sound
⟨RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.codRestrict _ f f.lt_top) fun ⟨a, h⟩ => by
rcases f.down.1 h with ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨b, rfl⟩⟩
#align ordinal.typein_top Ordinal.typein_top
@[simp]
theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : Ordinal.typein s (f a) = Ordinal.typein r a :=
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨RelIso.ofSurjective
(RelEmbedding.codRestrict _ ((Subrel.relEmbedding _ _).trans f) fun ⟨x, h⟩ => by
rw [RelEmbedding.trans_apply]; exact f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h)
fun ⟨y, h⟩ => by
rcases f.init h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨a, f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.1 h⟩,
Subtype.eq <| RelEmbedding.trans_apply _ _ _⟩⟩
#align ordinal.typein_apply Ordinal.typein_apply
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => by
have : f.top.1 = a := by
let f' := PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a
let g' := f.trans (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r b)
have : g'.top = f'.top := by rw [Subsingleton.elim f' g']
exact this
rw [← this]
exact f.top.2, fun h =>
⟨PrincipalSeg.codRestrict _ (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a) (fun x => @trans _ r _ _ _ _ x.2 h) h⟩⟩
#align ordinal.typein_lt_typein Ordinal.typein_lt_typein
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
∃ a, typein r a = o :=
inductionOn o (fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.top, typein_top _⟩) h
#align ordinal.typein_surj Ordinal.typein_surj
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
injective_of_increasing r (· < ·) (typein r) (typein_lt_typein r).2
#align ordinal.typein_injective Ordinal.typein_injective
@[simp]
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
#align ordinal.typein_inj Ordinal.typein_inj
/-- Principal segment version of the `typein` function, embedding a well order into
ordinals as a principal segment. -/
def typein.principalSeg {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
@PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) :=
⟨⟨⟨typein r, typein_injective r⟩, typein_lt_typein r⟩, type r,
fun _ ↦ ⟨typein_surj r, fun ⟨a, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ typein_lt_type r a⟩⟩
#align ordinal.typein.principal_seg Ordinal.typein.principalSeg
@[simp]
theorem typein.principalSeg_coe (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
(typein.principalSeg r : α → Ordinal) = typein r :=
rfl
#align ordinal.typein.principal_seg_coe Ordinal.typein.principalSeg_coe
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals. -/
/-- `enum r o h` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those
less than the order type of `r`, to the elements of `α`. -/
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (o) (h : o < type r) : α :=
(typein.principalSeg r).subrelIso ⟨o, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
typein r (enum r o h) = o :=
(typein.principalSeg r).apply_subrelIso _
#align ordinal.typein_enum Ordinal.typein_enum
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r (type s) h = f.top :=
(typein.principalSeg r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
#align ordinal.enum_type Ordinal.enum_type
@[simp]
theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
enum r (typein r a) (typein_lt_type r a) = a :=
enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a)
#align ordinal.enum_typein Ordinal.enum_typein
theorem enum_lt_enum {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h₁ : o₁ < type r)
(h₂ : o₂ < type r) : r (enum r o₁ h₁) (enum r o₂ h₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ := by
rw [← typein_lt_typein r, typein_enum, typein_enum]
#align ordinal.enum_lt_enum Ordinal.enum_lt_enum
theorem relIso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) :
∀ (hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s), f (enum r o hr) = enum s o hs := by
refine inductionOn o ?_; rintro γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩
rw [enum_type g, enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ltEquiv g f)]; rfl
#align ordinal.rel_iso_enum' Ordinal.relIso_enum'
theorem relIso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r o hr) =
enum s o
(by
convert hr using 1
apply Quotient.sound
exact ⟨f.symm⟩) :=
relIso_enum' _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.rel_iso_enum Ordinal.relIso_enum
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Ordinal (· < ·) :=
/-
wellFounded_iff_wellFounded_subrel.mpr (·.induction_on fun ⟨_, r, wo⟩ ↦
RelHomClass.wellFounded (typein.principalSeg r).subrelIso wo.wf)
-/
⟨fun a =>
inductionOn a fun α r wo =>
suffices ∀ a, Acc (· < ·) (typein r a) from
⟨_, fun o h =>
let ⟨a, e⟩ := typein_surj r h
e ▸ this a⟩
fun a =>
Acc.recOn (wo.wf.apply a) fun x _ IH =>
⟨_, fun o h => by
rcases typein_surj r (lt_trans h (typein_lt_type r _)) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact IH _ ((typein_lt_typein r).1 h)⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lt_wf Ordinal.lt_wf
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation Ordinal :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
/-- Reformulation of well founded induction on ordinals as a lemma that works with the
`induction` tactic, as in `induction i using Ordinal.induction with | h i IH => ?_`. -/
theorem induction {p : Ordinal.{u} → Prop} (i : Ordinal.{u}) (h : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j) :
p i :=
lt_wf.induction i h
#align ordinal.induction Ordinal.induction
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinality of any type on which a relation with that order
type is defined. -/
def card : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Quotient.map WellOrder.α fun _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.toEquiv⟩
#align ordinal.card Ordinal.card
@[simp]
theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : card (type r) = #α :=
rfl
#align ordinal.card_type Ordinal.card_type
-- Porting note: nolint, simpNF linter falsely claims the lemma never applies
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) :
#{ y // r y x } = (typein r x).card :=
rfl
#align ordinal.card_typein Ordinal.card_typein
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ _ _ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩ => ⟨f⟩
#align ordinal.card_le_card Ordinal.card_le_card
@[simp]
theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
#align ordinal.card_zero Ordinal.card_zero
@[simp]
theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
#align ordinal.card_one Ordinal.card_one
/-! ### Lifting ordinals to a higher universe -/
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hint .{u} below
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `Ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `Ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. For the initial segment version,
see `lift.initialSeg`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (o : Ordinal.{v}) : Ordinal.{max v u} :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w => type <| ULift.down.{u} ⁻¹'o w.r) fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift Ordinal.lift
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hints ULift.down.{v,u} below
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: Not in simpnf, added aux lemma below
theorem type_uLift (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
type (ULift.down.{v,u} ⁻¹'o r) = lift.{v} (type r) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })
rfl
#align ordinal.type_ulift Ordinal.type_uLift
-- Porting note: simpNF linter falsely claims that this never applies
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem type_uLift_aux (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
@type.{max v u} _ (fun x y => r (ULift.down.{v,u} x) (ULift.down.{v,u} y))
(inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder (ULift α) (ULift.down ⁻¹'o r))) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop}
{s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
lift.{v} (type r) = lift.{u} (type s) :=
((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <|
f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm).ordinal_type_eq
#align rel_iso.ordinal_lift_type_eq RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq
-- @[simp]
theorem type_lift_preimage {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (type (f ⁻¹'o r)) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_lift_preimage Ordinal.type_lift_preimage
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem type_lift_preimage_aux {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (@type _ (fun x y => r (f x) (f y))
(inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder β (f ⁻¹'o r)))) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp lemma never applies, tested
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a =>
inductionOn a fun _ r _ =>
Quotient.sound ⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_umax Ordinal.lift_umax
/-- `lift.{max v u, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp lemma never applies, tested
theorem lift_umax' : lift.{max v u, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
lift_umax
#align ordinal.lift_umax' Ordinal.lift_umax'
/-- An ordinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp lemma never applies, tested
theorem lift_id' (a : Ordinal) : lift a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ r _ => Quotient.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r⟩
#align ordinal.lift_id' Ordinal.lift_id'
/-- An ordinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u}
#align ordinal.lift_id Ordinal.lift_id
/-- An ordinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id' a
#align ordinal.lift_uzero Ordinal.lift_uzero
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift (a : Ordinal) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans <|
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_lift Ordinal.lift_lift
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) ≤ lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).trans <|
f.trans (InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s))⟩,
fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).trans <|
f.trans (InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm)⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_type_le Ordinal.lift_type_le
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) = lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'.trans
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s)⟩,
fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_type_eq Ordinal.lift_type_eq
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) < lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) := by
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (@Equiv.ulift.{max v w} α ⁻¹'o r) r
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift.{max v w} r) _
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (@Equiv.ulift.{max u w} β ⁻¹'o s) s
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift.{max u w} s) _
exact ⟨fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(f.equivLT (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).ltLe
(InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s))⟩,
fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(f.equivLT (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).ltLe
(InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm)⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_type_lt Ordinal.lift_type_lt
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u,v} a ≤ lift.{u,v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_type_le.{_,_,u}
#align ordinal.lift_le Ordinal.lift_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u,v} a = lift.{u,v} b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
#align ordinal.lift_inj Ordinal.lift_inj
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u,v} a < lift.{u,v} b ↔ a < b := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
#align ordinal.lift_lt Ordinal.lift_lt
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
#align ordinal.lift_zero Ordinal.lift_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
type_eq_one_of_unique _
#align ordinal.lift_one Ordinal.lift_one
@[simp]
theorem lift_card (a) : Cardinal.lift.{u,v} (card a)= card (lift.{u,v} a) :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align ordinal.lift_card Ordinal.lift_card
theorem lift_down' {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}}
(h : card.{max u v} b ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v,u} a) : ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b :=
let ⟨c, e⟩ := Cardinal.lift_down h
Cardinal.inductionOn c
(fun α =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ e' => by
rw [card_type, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{max u v, u} #β, ← Cardinal.lift_umax.{u, v},
lift_mk_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}] at e'
cases' e' with f
have g := RelIso.preimage f s
haveI := (g : f ⁻¹'o s ↪r s).isWellOrder
have := lift_type_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}.2 ⟨g⟩
rw [lift_id, lift_umax.{u, v}] at this
exact ⟨_, this⟩)
e
#align ordinal.lift_down' Ordinal.lift_down'
theorem lift_down {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} (h : b ≤ lift.{v,u} a) :
∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b :=
@lift_down' (card a) _ (by rw [lift_card]; exact card_le_card h)
#align ordinal.lift_down Ordinal.lift_down
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h
⟨a', e, lift_le.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
#align ordinal.le_lift_iff Ordinal.le_lift_iff
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h)
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
#align ordinal.lt_lift_iff Ordinal.lt_lift_iff
/-- Initial segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `ordinal.{u}` in
`ordinal.{v}` as an initial segment when `u ≤ v`. -/
def lift.initialSeg : @InitialSeg Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{max u v} (· < ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨⟨⟨lift.{v}, fun _ _ => lift_inj.1⟩, lift_lt⟩, fun _ _ h => lift_down (le_of_lt h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift.initial_seg Ordinal.lift.initialSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift.initialSeg_coe : (lift.initialSeg.{u,v} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{v,u} :=
rfl
#align ordinal.lift.initial_seg_coe Ordinal.lift.initialSeg_coe
/-! ### The first infinite ordinal `omega` -/
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega : Ordinal.{u} :=
lift <| @type ℕ (· < ·) _
#align ordinal.omega Ordinal.omega
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ω" => Ordinal.omega
/-- Note that the presence of this lemma makes `simp [omega]` form a loop. -/
@[simp]
theorem type_nat_lt : @type ℕ (· < ·) _ = ω :=
(lift_id _).symm
#align ordinal.type_nat_lt Ordinal.type_nat_lt
@[simp]
theorem card_omega : card ω = ℵ₀ :=
rfl
#align ordinal.card_omega Ordinal.card_omega
@[simp]
theorem lift_omega : lift ω = ω :=
lift_lift _
#align ordinal.lift_omega Ordinal.lift_omega
/-!
### Definition and first properties of addition on ordinals
In this paragraph, we introduce the addition on ordinals, and prove just enough properties to
deduce that the order on ordinals is total (and therefore well-founded). Further properties of
the addition, together with properties of the other operations, are proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
-/
/-- `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`. -/
instance add : Add Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ =>
Quotient.liftOn₂ o₁ o₂ (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => type (Sum.Lex r s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.sumLexCongr f g⟩⟩
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Ordinal.{u} where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
one := 1
zero_add o :=
inductionOn o fun α r _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(emptySum PEmpty α).symm, Sum.lex_inr_inr⟩⟩
add_zero o :=
inductionOn o fun α r _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(sumEmpty α PEmpty).symm, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩⟩
add_assoc o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨⟨sumAssoc _ _ _, by
intros a b
rcases a with (⟨a | a⟩ | a) <;> rcases b with (⟨b | b⟩ | b) <;>
simp only [sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl, sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr, sumAssoc_apply_inr,
Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl]⟩⟩
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem card_add (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : card (o₁ + o₂) = card o₁ + card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ __ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align ordinal.card_add Ordinal.card_add
@[simp]
theorem type_sum_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Sum.Lex r s) = type r + type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_sum_lex Ordinal.type_sum_lex
@[simp]
theorem card_nat (n : ℕ) : card.{u} n = n := by
induction n <;> [simp; simp only [card_add, card_one, Nat.cast_succ, *]]
#align ordinal.card_nat Ordinal.card_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem card_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
card.{u} (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
card_nat n
-- Porting note: Rewritten proof of elim, previous version was difficult to debug
instance add_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) where
elim := fun c a b h => by
revert h c
refine inductionOn a (fun α₁ r₁ _ ↦ ?_)
refine inductionOn b (fun α₂ r₂ _ ↦ ?_)
rintro c ⟨⟨⟨f, fo⟩, fi⟩⟩
refine inductionOn c (fun β s _ ↦ ?_)
refine ⟨⟨⟨(Embedding.refl.{u+1} _).sumMap f, ?_⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· intros a b
match a, b with
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl b => exact Sum.lex_inl_inl.trans Sum.lex_inl_inl.symm
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inr b => apply iff_of_true <;> apply Sum.Lex.sep
| Sum.inr a, Sum.inl b => apply iff_of_false <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inl
| Sum.inr a, Sum.inr b => exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.trans <| fo.trans Sum.lex_inr_inr.symm
· intros a b H
match a, b, H with
| _, Sum.inl b, _ => exact ⟨Sum.inl b, rfl⟩
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inr b, H => exact (Sum.lex_inr_inl H).elim
| Sum.inr a, Sum.inr b, H =>
let ⟨w, h⟩ := fi _ _ (Sum.lex_inr_inr.1 H)
exact ⟨Sum.inr w, congr_arg Sum.inr h⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_le Ordinal.add_covariantClass_le
-- Porting note: Rewritten proof of elim, previous version was difficult to debug
instance add_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·) where
elim := fun c a b h => by
revert h c
refine inductionOn a (fun α₁ r₁ _ ↦ ?_)
refine inductionOn b (fun α₂ r₂ _ ↦ ?_)
rintro c ⟨⟨⟨f, fo⟩, fi⟩⟩
refine inductionOn c (fun β s _ ↦ ?_)
exact @RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le _ _ (Sum.Lex r₁ s) (Sum.Lex r₂ s) _ _
⟨f.sumMap (Embedding.refl _), by
intro a b
constructor <;> intro H
· cases' a with a a <;> cases' b with b b <;> cases H <;> constructor <;>
[rwa [← fo]; assumption]
· cases H <;> constructor <;> [rwa [fo]; assumption]⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.add_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_add_right (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ a + b := by
simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
#align ordinal.le_add_right Ordinal.le_add_right
theorem le_add_left (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + a := by
simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
#align ordinal.le_add_left Ordinal.le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b =>
match lt_or_eq_of_le (le_add_left b a), lt_or_eq_of_le (le_add_right a b) with
| Or.inr h, _ => by rw [h]; exact Or.inl (le_add_right _ _)
| _, Or.inr h => by rw [h]; exact Or.inr (le_add_left _ _)
| Or.inl h₁, Or.inl h₂ => by
revert h₁ h₂
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α₁ r₁ _
refine inductionOn b ?_
intro α₂ r₂ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩
rw [← typein_top f, ← typein_top g, le_iff_lt_or_eq, le_iff_lt_or_eq,
typein_lt_typein, typein_lt_typein]
rcases trichotomous_of (Sum.Lex r₁ r₂) g.top f.top with (h | h | h) <;>
[exact Or.inl (Or.inl h); (left; right; rw [h]); exact Or.inr (Or.inl h)]
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Ordinal :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance isWellOrder : IsWellOrder Ordinal (· < ·) where
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Ordinal :=
IsWellOrder.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
theorem max_zero_left : ∀ a : Ordinal, max 0 a = a :=
max_bot_left
#align ordinal.max_zero_left Ordinal.max_zero_left
theorem max_zero_right : ∀ a : Ordinal, max a 0 = a :=
max_bot_right
#align ordinal.max_zero_right Ordinal.max_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem max_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
max_eq_bot
#align ordinal.max_eq_zero Ordinal.max_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Ordinal) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
#align ordinal.Inf_empty Ordinal.sInf_empty
/-! ### Successor order properties -/
private theorem succ_le_iff' {a b : Ordinal} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨lt_of_lt_of_le
(inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
⟨⟨⟨⟨fun x => Sum.inl x, fun _ _ => Sum.inl.inj⟩, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩,
Sum.inr PUnit.unit, fun b =>
Sum.recOn b (fun x => ⟨fun _ => ⟨x, rfl⟩, fun _ => Sum.Lex.sep _ _⟩) fun x =>
Sum.lex_inr_inr.trans ⟨False.elim, fun ⟨x, H⟩ => Sum.inl_ne_inr H⟩⟩⟩),
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β s hs ⟨⟨f, t, hf⟩⟩ => by
haveI := hs
refine ⟨⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.rec f fun _ => t) (fun a b ↦ ?_), fun a b ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rcases a with (a | _) <;> rcases b with (b | _)
· simpa only [Sum.lex_inl_inl] using f.map_rel_iff.2
· intro
rw [hf]
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
· exact False.elim ∘ Sum.lex_inr_inl
· exact False.elim ∘ Sum.lex_inr_inr.1
· rcases a with (a | _)
· intro h
have := @PrincipalSeg.init _ _ _ _ _ ⟨f, t, hf⟩ _ _ h
cases' this with w h
exact ⟨Sum.inl w, h⟩
· intro h
cases' (hf b).1 h with w h
exact ⟨Sum.inl w, h⟩⟩
instance noMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder Ordinal :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨_, succ_le_iff'.1 le_rfl⟩⟩
instance succOrder : SuccOrder Ordinal.{u} :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun o => o + 1) succ_le_iff'
@[simp]
theorem add_one_eq_succ (o : Ordinal) : o + 1 = succ o :=
rfl
#align ordinal.add_one_eq_succ Ordinal.add_one_eq_succ
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 :=
zero_add 1
#align ordinal.succ_zero Ordinal.succ_zero
-- Porting note: Proof used to be rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_one : succ (1 : Ordinal) = 2 := by congr; simp only [Nat.unaryCast, zero_add]
#align ordinal.succ_one Ordinal.succ_one
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align ordinal.add_succ Ordinal.add_succ
theorem one_le_iff_pos {o : Ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ 0 < o := by rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
#align ordinal.one_le_iff_pos Ordinal.one_le_iff_pos
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero Ordinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero
theorem succ_pos (o : Ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
bot_lt_succ o
#align ordinal.succ_pos Ordinal.succ_pos
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : Ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt <| succ_pos o
#align ordinal.succ_ne_zero Ordinal.succ_ne_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 1,078 | 1,079 | theorem lt_one_iff_zero {a : Ordinal} : a < 1 ↔ a = 0 := by |
simpa using @lt_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.fractional_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ed90a7d327c3a5caf65a6faf7e8a0d63c4605df7"
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P] [loc : IsLocalization S P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P'] [loc' : IsLocalization S P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P''] [loc'' : IsLocalization S P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, g.map_smul, hb']⟩
#align is_fractional.map IsFractional.map
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map FractionalIdeal.map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_map FractionalIdeal.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
#align fractional_ideal.mem_map FractionalIdeal.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
#align fractional_ideal.map_id FractionalIdeal.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
#align fractional_ideal.map_comp FractionalIdeal.map_comp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.map_coeIdeal
@[simp]
theorem map_one : (1 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 1 :=
map_coeIdeal g ⊤
#align fractional_ideal.map_one FractionalIdeal.map_one
@[simp]
theorem map_zero : (0 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 0 :=
map_coeIdeal g 0
#align fractional_ideal.map_zero FractionalIdeal.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_add : (I + J).map g = I.map g + J.map g :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_sup _ _ _)
#align fractional_ideal.map_add FractionalIdeal.map_add
@[simp]
theorem map_mul : (I * J).map g = I.map g * J.map g := by
simp only [mul_def]
exact coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_mul _ _ _)
#align fractional_ideal.map_mul FractionalIdeal.map_mul
@[simp]
theorem map_map_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : (I.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P')).map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P) = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.symm_comp, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_map_symm FractionalIdeal.map_map_symm
@[simp]
theorem map_symm_map (I : FractionalIdeal S P') (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(I.map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P)).map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.comp_symm, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_symm_map FractionalIdeal.map_symm_map
theorem map_mem_map {f : P →ₐ[R] P'} (h : Function.Injective f) {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
f x ∈ map f I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_map.trans ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', x'_eq⟩ => h x'_eq ▸ hx', fun h => ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_mem_map FractionalIdeal.map_mem_map
theorem map_injective (f : P →ₐ[R] P') (h : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') := fun _ _ hIJ =>
ext fun _ => (map_mem_map h).symm.trans (hIJ.symm ▸ map_mem_map h)
#align fractional_ideal.map_injective FractionalIdeal.map_injective
/-- If `g` is an equivalence, `map g` is an isomorphism -/
def mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' where
toFun := map g
invFun := map g.symm
map_add' I J := map_add I J _
map_mul' I J := map_mul I J _
left_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
right_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.comp_symm, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coeFun_mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(mapEquiv g : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') = map g :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_fun_map_equiv FractionalIdeal.coeFun_mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) : mapEquiv g I = map (↑g) I :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_apply FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
((mapEquiv g).symm : FractionalIdeal S P' ≃+* _) = mapEquiv g.symm :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_symm FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv AlgEquiv.refl = RingEquiv.refl (FractionalIdeal S P) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun x => by simp
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_refl FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_refl
theorem isFractional_span_iff {s : Set P} :
IsFractional S (span R s) ↔ ∃ a ∈ S, ∀ b : P, b ∈ s → IsInteger R (a • b) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ => ⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb => h b (subset_span hb)⟩, fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ =>
⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb =>
span_induction hb h
(by
rw [smul_zero]
exact isInteger_zero)
(fun x y hx hy => by
rw [smul_add]
exact isInteger_add hx hy)
fun s x hx => by
rw [smul_comm]
exact isInteger_smul hx⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_span_iff FractionalIdeal.isFractional_span_iff
theorem isFractional_of_fg {I : Submodule R P} (hI : I.FG) : IsFractional S I := by
rcases hI with ⟨I, rfl⟩
rcases exist_integer_multiples_of_finset S I with ⟨⟨s, hs1⟩, hs⟩
rw [isFractional_span_iff]
exact ⟨s, hs1, hs⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_of_fg FractionalIdeal.isFractional_of_fg
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P} (hx : x ∈ I * J) :
∃ T T' : Finset P, (T : Set P) ⊆ I ∧ (T' : Set P) ⊆ J ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set P) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul (by simpa using mem_coe.mpr hx)
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul FractionalIdeal.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul
variable (S)
theorem coeIdeal_fg (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R) :
FG ((I : FractionalIdeal S P) : Submodule R P) ↔ I.FG :=
coeSubmodule_fg _ inj _
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_fg FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_fg
variable {S}
theorem fg_unit (I : (FractionalIdeal S P)ˣ) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
Submodule.fg_unit <| Units.map (coeSubmoduleHom S P).toMonoidHom I
#align fractional_ideal.fg_unit FractionalIdeal.fg_unit
theorem fg_of_isUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P) (h : IsUnit I) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
fg_unit h.unit
#align fractional_ideal.fg_of_is_unit FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit
theorem _root_.Ideal.fg_of_isUnit (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R)
(h : IsUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P)) : I.FG := by
rw [← coeIdeal_fg S inj I]
exact FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit I h
#align ideal.fg_of_is_unit Ideal.fg_of_isUnit
variable (S P P')
/-- `canonicalEquiv f f'` is the canonical equivalence between the fractional
ideals in `P` and in `P'`, which are both localizations of `R` at `S`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def canonicalEquiv : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' :=
mapEquiv
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv P P' (RingEquiv.refl R)
(show S.map _ = S by rw [RingEquiv.toMonoidHom_refl, Submonoid.map_id]) with
commutes' := fun r => ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ _ }
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mem_canonicalEquiv_apply {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P'} :
x ∈ canonicalEquiv S P P' I ↔
∃ y ∈ I,
IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R) (fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy)
(y : P) =
x := by
rw [canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_apply, mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mem_canonical_equiv_apply FractionalIdeal.mem_canonicalEquiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_symm : (canonicalEquiv S P P').symm = canonicalEquiv S P' P :=
RingEquiv.ext fun I =>
SetLike.ext_iff.mpr fun x => by
rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply, canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_symm, mapEquiv_apply,
mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_symm FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_symm
theorem canonicalEquiv_flip (I) : canonicalEquiv S P P' (canonicalEquiv S P' P I) = I := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_symm]; erw [RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_flip FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_flip
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
canonicalEquiv S P' P'' (canonicalEquiv S P P' I) = canonicalEquiv S P P'' I := by
ext
simp only [IsLocalization.map_map, RingHomInvPair.comp_eq₂, mem_canonicalEquiv_apply,
exists_prop, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv
theorem canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] :
(canonicalEquiv S P P').trans (canonicalEquiv S P' P'') = canonicalEquiv S P P'' :=
RingEquiv.ext (canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv S P P' P'')
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_trans_canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : canonicalEquiv S P P' I = I := by
ext
simp [IsLocalization.map_eq]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_self : canonicalEquiv S P P = RingEquiv.refl _ := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv S P P]
convert (canonicalEquiv S P P).symm_trans_self
exact (canonicalEquiv_symm S P P).symm
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_self FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_self
end
section IsFractionRing
/-!
### `IsFractionRing` section
This section concerns fractional ideals in the field of fractions,
i.e. the type `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` where `IsFractionRing R K`.
-/
variable {K K' : Type*} [Field K] [Field K']
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra R K'] [IsFractionRing R K']
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (h : K →ₐ[R] K')
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals contain a nonzero integer. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∃ x, x ≠ 0 ∧ algebraMap R K x ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨y : K, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hI)
have y_ne_zero : y ≠ 0 := by simpa using y_not_mem
obtain ⟨z, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ := exists_integer_multiple R⁰ y
refine ⟨x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Ne, ← @IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff R _ K, hx, Algebra.smul_def]
exact mul_ne_zero (IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors z.2) y_ne_zero
· rw [hx]
exact smul_mem _ _ y_mem
#align fractional_ideal.exists_ne_zero_mem_is_integer FractionalIdeal.exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger
theorem map_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) : I.map h ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, x_ne_zero, hx⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
contrapose! x_ne_zero with map_eq_zero
refine IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp (eq_zero_iff.mp map_eq_zero _ (mem_map.mpr ?_))
exact ⟨algebraMap R K x, hx, h.commutes x⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.map_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] : I.map h = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨not_imp_not.mp (map_ne_zero _), fun hI => hI.symm ▸ map_zero h⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_eq_zero_iff FractionalIdeal.map_eq_zero_iff
theorem coeIdeal_injective : Function.Injective (fun (I : Ideal R) ↦ (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)) :=
coeIdeal_injective' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_injective FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_injective
theorem coeIdeal_inj {I J : Ideal R} :
(I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ↔ I = J :=
coeIdeal_inj' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_inj FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 ↔ I = ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_eq_zero' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_eq_zero FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_zero
theorem coeIdeal_ne_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 ↔ I ≠ ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 ↔ I = 1 := by
simpa only [Ideal.one_eq_top] using coeIdeal_inj
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_eq_one FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one
theorem coeIdeal_ne_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coeIdeal_eq_one
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_one FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_one
theorem num_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} : I.num = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ zero_of_num_eq_bot zero_not_mem_nonZeroDivisors h,
fun h ↦ h ▸ num_zero_eq (IsFractionRing.injective R K)⟩
end IsFractionRing
section Quotient
/-!
### `quotient` section
This section defines the ideal quotient of fractional ideals.
In this section we need that each non-zero `y : R` has an inverse in
the localization, i.e. that the localization is a field. We satisfy this
assumption by taking `S = nonZeroDivisors R`, `R`'s localization at which
is a field because `R` is a domain.
-/
open scoped Classical
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [frac : IsFractionRing R₁ K]
instance : Nontrivial (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
have this : (1 : K) ∈ (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := by
rw [← (algebraMap R₁ K).map_one]
simpa only [h] using coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1
one_ne_zero ((mem_zero_iff _).mp this)⟩⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : I ≠ 0 := fun hI =>
zero_ne_one' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
(by
convert h
simp [hI])
#align fractional_ideal.ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one FractionalIdeal.ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one
variable [IsDomain R₁]
theorem _root_.IsFractional.div_of_nonzero {I J : Submodule R₁ K} :
IsFractional R₁⁰ I → IsFractional R₁⁰ J → J ≠ 0 → IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J)
| ⟨aI, haI, hI⟩, ⟨aJ, haJ, hJ⟩, h => by
obtain ⟨y, mem_J, not_mem_zero⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (show 0 < J by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h)
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hJ y mem_J
use aI * y'
constructor
· apply (nonZeroDivisors R₁).mul_mem haI (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr _)
intro y'_eq_zero
have : algebraMap R₁ K aJ * y = 0 := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, ← hy', y'_eq_zero, RingHom.map_zero]
have y_zero :=
(mul_eq_zero.mp this).resolve_left
(mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap R₁ K)).1 (IsFractionRing.injective _ _) _)
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp haJ))
apply not_mem_zero
simpa
intro b hb
convert hI _ (hb _ (Submodule.smul_mem _ aJ mem_J)) using 1
rw [← hy', mul_comm b, ← Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul]
#align is_fractional.div_of_nonzero IsFractional.div_of_nonzero
theorem fractional_div_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
I.isFractional.div_of_nonzero J.isFractional fun H =>
h <| coeToSubmodule_injective <| H.trans coe_zero.symm
#align fractional_ideal.fractional_div_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.fractional_div_of_nonzero
noncomputable instance : Div (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨fun I J => if h : J = 0 then 0 else ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩⟩
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
@[simp]
theorem div_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align fractional_ideal.div_zero FractionalIdeal.div_zero
theorem div_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
I / J = ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align fractional_ideal.div_nonzero FractionalIdeal.div_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem coe_div {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
(↑(I / J) : Submodule R₁ K) = ↑I / (↑J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_neg hJ)
#align fractional_ideal.coe_div FractionalIdeal.coe_div
theorem mem_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) {x} :
x ∈ I / J ↔ ∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I := by
rw [div_nonzero h]
exact Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem
#align fractional_ideal.mem_div_iff_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.mem_div_iff_of_nonzero
theorem mul_one_div_le_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, div_zero, mul_zero]
exact zero_le 1
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI, coe_one]
apply Submodule.mul_one_div_le_one
#align fractional_ideal.mul_one_div_le_one FractionalIdeal.mul_one_div_le_one
theorem le_self_mul_one_div {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * (1 / I) := by
by_cases hI_nz : I = 0
· rw [hI_nz, div_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI_nz, coe_one]
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one] at hI
exact Submodule.le_self_mul_one_div hI
#align fractional_ideal.le_self_mul_one_div FractionalIdeal.le_self_mul_one_div
theorem le_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ y ∈ J', x * y ∈ J :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mp (h hx), fun h x hx =>
(mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mpr (h x hx)⟩
#align fractional_ideal.le_div_iff_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.le_div_iff_of_nonzero
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ I * J' ≤ J := by
rw [div_nonzero hJ']
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [← coe_le_coe (I := I * J') (J := J), coe_mul]
exact Submodule.le_div_iff_mul_le
#align fractional_ideal.le_div_iff_mul_le FractionalIdeal.le_div_iff_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem div_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 1 = I := by
rw [div_nonzero (one_ne_zero' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K))]
ext
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mp h 1 ((algebraMap R₁ K).map_one ▸ coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1)
· apply mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mpr
rintro y ⟨y', _, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [mul_comm, Algebra.linearMap_apply, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ y' h
#align fractional_ideal.div_one FractionalIdeal.div_one
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) :
J = 1 / I := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hx hy
#align fractional_ideal.eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right FractionalIdeal.eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right
theorem mul_div_self_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨1 / I, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right I J hJ]⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mul_div_self_cancel_iff FractionalIdeal.mul_div_self_cancel_iff
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
theorem map_div (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(I / J).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = I.map h / J.map h := by
by_cases H : J = 0
· rw [H, div_zero, map_zero, div_zero]
· -- Porting note: `simp` wouldn't apply these lemmas so do them manually using `rw`
rw [← coeToSubmodule_inj, div_nonzero H, div_nonzero (map_ne_zero _ H)]
simp [Submodule.map_div]
#align fractional_ideal.map_div FractionalIdeal.map_div
-- Porting note: doesn't need to be @[simp] because this follows from `map_one` and `map_div`
theorem map_one_div (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(1 / I).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = 1 / I.map h := by rw [map_div, map_one]
#align fractional_ideal.map_one_div FractionalIdeal.map_one_div
end Quotient
section Field
variable {R₁ K L : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [Algebra K L] [IsFractionRing K L]
theorem eq_zero_or_one (I : FractionalIdeal K⁰ L) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hI
simp_rw [@SetLike.ext_iff _ _ _ I 1, mem_one_iff]
intro x
constructor
· intro x_mem
obtain ⟨n, d, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective K⁰ x
refine ⟨n / d, ?_⟩
rw [map_div₀, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div]
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, y_ne, y_mem⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
rw [← div_mul_cancel₀ x y_ne, RingHom.map_mul, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact smul_mem (M := L) I (x / y) y_mem
#align fractional_ideal.eq_zero_or_one FractionalIdeal.eq_zero_or_one
theorem eq_zero_or_one_of_isField (hF : IsField R₁) (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 :=
letI : Field R₁ := hF.toField
eq_zero_or_one I
#align fractional_ideal.eq_zero_or_one_of_is_field FractionalIdeal.eq_zero_or_one_of_isField
end Field
section PrincipalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
open scoped Classical
variable (R₁)
/-- `FractionalIdeal.span_finset R₁ s f` is the fractional ideal of `R₁` generated by `f '' s`. -/
-- Porting note: `@[simps]` generated a `Subtype.val` coercion instead of a
-- `FractionalIdeal.coeToSubmodule` coercion
def spanFinset {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K :=
⟨Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s), by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples R₁⁰ s f
refine ⟨a', a'.2, fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction hx ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ha' i hi
· rw [smul_zero]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_zero
· intro x y hx hy
rw [smul_add]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_add hx hy
· intro c x hx
rw [smul_comm]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_smul hx⟩
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset FractionalIdeal.spanFinset
@[simp] lemma spanFinset_coe {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) :
(spanFinset R₁ s f : Submodule R₁ K) = Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s) :=
rfl
variable {R₁}
@[simp]
theorem spanFinset_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f = 0 ↔ ∀ j ∈ s, f j = 0 := by
simp only [← coeToSubmodule_inj, spanFinset_coe, coe_zero, Submodule.span_eq_bot,
Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset_eq_zero FractionalIdeal.spanFinset_eq_zero
theorem spanFinset_ne_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ j ∈ s, f j ≠ 0 := by simp
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.spanFinset_ne_zero
open Submodule.IsPrincipal
theorem isFractional_span_singleton (x : P) : IsFractional S (span R {x} : Submodule R P) :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_integer_multiple S x
isFractional_span_iff.mpr ⟨a, a.2, fun _ hx' => (Set.mem_singleton_iff.mp hx').symm ▸ ha⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.isFractional_span_singleton
variable (S)
/-- `spanSingleton x` is the fractional ideal generated by `x` if `0 ∉ S` -/
irreducible_def spanSingleton (x : P) : FractionalIdeal S P :=
⟨span R {x}, isFractional_span_singleton x⟩
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton
-- local attribute [semireducible] span_singleton
@[simp]
theorem coe_spanSingleton (x : P) : (spanSingleton S x : Submodule R P) = span R {x} := by
rw [spanSingleton]
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.coe_spanSingleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_spanSingleton {x y : P} : x ∈ spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : R, z • y = x := by
rw [spanSingleton]
exact Submodule.mem_span_singleton
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.mem_spanSingleton
theorem mem_spanSingleton_self (x : P) : x ∈ spanSingleton S x :=
(mem_spanSingleton S).mpr ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_singleton_self FractionalIdeal.mem_spanSingleton_self
variable (P) in
/-- A version of `FractionalIdeal.den_mul_self_eq_num` in terms of fractional ideals. -/
theorem den_mul_self_eq_num' (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
spanSingleton S (algebraMap R P I.den) * I = I.num := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
dsimp only
rw [coe_mul, ← smul_eq_mul, coe_spanSingleton, smul_eq_mul, Submodule.span_singleton_mul]
convert I.den_mul_self_eq_num using 1
ext
erw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_smul_set]
simp [Algebra.smul_def]
variable {S}
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_le_iff_mem {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
spanSingleton S x ≤ I ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_spanSingleton, Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, mem_coe]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_le_iff_mem
theorem spanSingleton_eq_spanSingleton [NoZeroSMulDivisors R P] {x y : P} :
spanSingleton S x = spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : Rˣ, z • x = y := by
rw [← Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, spanSingleton, spanSingleton]
exact Subtype.mk_eq_mk
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_eq_spanSingleton
theorem eq_spanSingleton_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal S P) [IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P)] :
I = spanSingleton S (generator (I : Submodule R P)) := by
-- Porting note: this used to be `coeToSubmodule_injective (span_singleton_generator ↑I).symm`
-- but Lean 4 struggled to unify everything. Turned it into an explicit `rw`.
rw [spanSingleton, ← coeToSubmodule_inj, coe_mk, span_singleton_generator]
#align fractional_ideal.eq_span_singleton_of_principal FractionalIdeal.eq_spanSingleton_of_principal
theorem isPrincipal_iff (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P) ↔ ∃ x, I = spanSingleton S x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨@generator _ _ _ _ _ (↑I) h, @eq_spanSingleton_of_principal _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I h⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => { principal' := ⟨x, Eq.trans (congr_arg _ hx) (coe_spanSingleton _ x)⟩ }⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_principal_iff FractionalIdeal.isPrincipal_iff
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_zero : spanSingleton S (0 : P) = 0 := by
ext
simp [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_zero FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_zero
theorem spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff {y : P} : spanSingleton S y = 0 ↔ y = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
span_eq_bot.mp (by simpa using congr_arg Subtype.val h : span R {y} = ⊥) y (mem_singleton y),
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_eq_zero_iff FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff
theorem spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff {y : P} : spanSingleton S y ≠ 0 ↔ y ≠ 0 :=
not_congr spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_ne_zero_iff FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_one : spanSingleton S (1 : P) = 1 := by
ext
refine (mem_spanSingleton S).trans ((exists_congr ?_).trans (mem_one_iff S).symm)
intro x'
rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_one FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_one
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton (x y : P) :
spanSingleton S x * spanSingleton S y = spanSingleton S (x * y) := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, coe_spanSingleton, span_mul_span, singleton_mul_singleton]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_pow (x : P) (n : ℕ) : spanSingleton S x ^ n = spanSingleton S (x ^ n) := by
induction' n with n hn
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, spanSingleton_one]
· rw [pow_succ, hn, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, pow_succ]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_pow FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_pow
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_span_singleton (x : R) :
(↑(Ideal.span {x} : Ideal R) : FractionalIdeal S P) = spanSingleton S (algebraMap R P x) := by
ext y
refine (mem_coeIdeal S).trans (Iff.trans ?_ (mem_spanSingleton S).symm)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hy'
use x'
rw [smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
· rintro ⟨y', rfl⟩
refine ⟨y' * x, Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mpr ⟨y', rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_span_singleton
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_spanSingleton {P'} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P'] [IsLocalization S P']
(x : P) :
canonicalEquiv S P P' (spanSingleton S x) =
spanSingleton S
(IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R)
(fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy) x) := by
apply SetLike.ext_iff.mpr
intro y
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_spanSingleton]
obtain ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ := (mem_canonicalEquiv_apply _ _ _).mp h
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton _).mp hx'
use z
rw [IsLocalization.map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
· rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply]
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton _).mp h
use z • x
use (mem_spanSingleton _).mpr ⟨z, rfl⟩
simp [IsLocalization.map_smul]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_spanSingleton
theorem mem_singleton_mul {x y : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
y ∈ spanSingleton S x * I ↔ ∃ y' ∈ I, y = x * y' := by
constructor
· intro h
refine FractionalIdeal.mul_induction_on h ?_ ?_
· intro x' hx' y' hy'
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton S).mp hx'
use a • y', Submodule.smul_mem (I : Submodule R P) a hy'
rw [← ha, Algebra.mul_smul_comm, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc]
· rintro _ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
exact ⟨y + y', Submodule.add_mem (I : Submodule R P) hy hy', (mul_add _ _ _).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
exact mul_mem_mul ((mem_spanSingleton S).mpr ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩) hy'
#align fractional_ideal.mem_singleton_mul FractionalIdeal.mem_singleton_mul
variable (K)
theorem mk'_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal {I J : Ideal R₁} {x y : R₁} (hy : y ∈ R₁⁰) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' K x ⟨y, hy⟩) * I = (J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ↔
Ideal.span {x} * I = Ideal.span {y} * J := by
have :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' _ (1 : R₁) ⟨y, hy⟩) *
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (algebraMap R₁ K y) =
1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_comm, ← IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one,
IsLocalization.mk'_self, spanSingleton_one]
let y' : (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)ˣ := Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ this
have coe_y' : ↑y' = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' K (1 : R₁) ⟨y, hy⟩) := rfl
refine Iff.trans ?_ (y'.mul_right_inj.trans coeIdeal_inj)
rw [coe_y', coeIdeal_mul, coeIdeal_span_singleton, coeIdeal_mul, coeIdeal_span_singleton, ←
mul_assoc, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, ← mul_assoc, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton,
mul_comm (mk' _ _ _), ← IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, mul_comm (mk' _ _ _), ←
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, IsLocalization.mk'_self, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
#align fractional_ideal.mk'_mul_coe_ideal_eq_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.mk'_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal
variable {K}
theorem spanSingleton_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal {I J : Ideal R₁} {z : K} :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ z * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) = J ↔
Ideal.span {((IsLocalization.sec R₁⁰ z).1 : R₁)} * I =
Ideal.span {((IsLocalization.sec R₁⁰ z).2 : R₁)} * J := by
rw [← mk'_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal K (IsLocalization.sec R₁⁰ z).2.prop,
IsLocalization.mk'_sec K z]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_mul_coe_ideal_eq_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal
variable [IsDomain R₁]
theorem one_div_spanSingleton (x : K) : 1 / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = spanSingleton R₁⁰ x⁻¹ :=
if h : x = 0 then by simp [h] else (eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right _ _ (by simp [h])).symm
#align fractional_ideal.one_div_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.one_div_spanSingleton
@[simp]
theorem div_spanSingleton (J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (d : K) :
J / spanSingleton R₁⁰ d = spanSingleton R₁⁰ d⁻¹ * J := by
rw [← one_div_spanSingleton]
by_cases hd : d = 0
· simp only [hd, spanSingleton_zero, div_zero, zero_mul]
have h_spand : spanSingleton R₁⁰ d ≠ 0 := mt spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff.mp hd
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
dsimp only [val_eq_coe] at hx ⊢ -- Porting note: get rid of the partially applied `coe`s
rw [coe_div h_spand, Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem] at hx
specialize hx d (mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ d)
have h_xd : x = d⁻¹ * (x * d) := by field_simp
rw [coe_mul, one_div_spanSingleton, h_xd]
exact Submodule.mul_mem_mul (mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ _) hx
· rw [le_div_iff_mul_le h_spand, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, one_div_spanSingleton,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, inv_mul_cancel hd, spanSingleton_one, mul_one]
#align fractional_ideal.div_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.div_spanSingleton
theorem exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :
∃ (a : R₁) (aI : Ideal R₁), a ≠ 0 ∧ I = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (algebraMap R₁ K a)⁻¹ * aI := by
obtain ⟨a_inv, nonzero, ha⟩ := I.isFractional
have nonzero := mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp nonzero
have map_a_nonzero : algebraMap R₁ K a_inv ≠ 0 :=
mt IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp nonzero
refine
⟨a_inv,
Submodule.comap (Algebra.linearMap R₁ K) ↑(spanSingleton R₁⁰ (algebraMap R₁ K a_inv) * I),
nonzero, ext fun x => Iff.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ mem_singleton_mul.symm⟩
· intro hx
obtain ⟨x', hx'⟩ := ha x hx
rw [Algebra.smul_def] at hx'
refine ⟨algebraMap R₁ K x', (mem_coeIdeal _).mpr ⟨x', mem_singleton_mul.mpr ?_, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· exact ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
· rw [hx', ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel map_a_nonzero, one_mul]
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp hy
obtain ⟨y', hy', hx'⟩ := mem_singleton_mul.mp hx'
rw [Algebra.linearMap_apply] at hx'
rwa [hx', ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel map_a_nonzero, one_mul]
#align fractional_ideal.exists_eq_span_singleton_mul FractionalIdeal.exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `J` is nonzero. -/
theorem ideal_factor_ne_zero {R} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K]
[IsFractionRing R K] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R} {J : Ideal R}
(haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) : J ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ by
rw [h, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, coeIdeal_bot, MulZeroClass.mul_zero] at haJ
exact hI haJ
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `a` is nonzero. -/
theorem constant_factor_ne_zero {R} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K]
[IsFractionRing R K] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R} {J : Ideal R}
(haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
(Ideal.span {a} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ by
rw [Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot] at h
rw [h, RingHom.map_zero, inv_zero, spanSingleton_zero, MulZeroClass.zero_mul] at haJ
exact hI haJ
instance isPrincipal {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [Algebra R K]
[IsFractionRing R K] (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) : (I : Submodule R K).IsPrincipal := by
obtain ⟨a, aI, -, ha⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
use (algebraMap R K a)⁻¹ * algebraMap R K (generator aI)
suffices I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K a)⁻¹ * algebraMap R K (generator aI)) by
rw [spanSingleton] at this
exact congr_arg Subtype.val this
conv_lhs => rw [ha, ← span_singleton_generator aI]
rw [Ideal.submodule_span_eq, coeIdeal_span_singleton (generator aI),
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]
#align fractional_ideal.is_principal FractionalIdeal.isPrincipal
theorem le_spanSingleton_mul_iff {x : P} {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} :
I ≤ spanSingleton S x * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (hzI : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ spanSingleton _ x * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI by
simp only [mem_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
#align fractional_ideal.le_span_singleton_mul_iff FractionalIdeal.le_spanSingleton_mul_iff
theorem spanSingleton_mul_le_iff {x : P} {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} :
spanSingleton _ x * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J := by
simp only [mul_le, mem_singleton_mul, mem_spanSingleton]
constructor
· intro h zI hzI
exact h x ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩ zI hzI
· rintro h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩ zI hzI
rw [Algebra.smul_mul_assoc]
exact Submodule.smul_mem J.1 _ (h zI hzI)
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_mul_le_iff FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_mul_le_iff
theorem eq_spanSingleton_mul {x : P} {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} :
I = spanSingleton _ x * J ↔ (∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI) ∧ ∀ z ∈ J, x * z ∈ I := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_spanSingleton_mul_iff, spanSingleton_mul_le_iff]
#align fractional_ideal.eq_span_singleton_mul FractionalIdeal.eq_spanSingleton_mul
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 904 | 909 | theorem num_le (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
(I.num : FractionalIdeal S P) ≤ I := by |
rw [← I.den_mul_self_eq_num', spanSingleton_mul_le_iff]
intro _ h
rw [← Algebra.smul_def]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
#align_import field_theory.ratfunc from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf9bbbcf0c1c1ead18280b0d010e417b10abb1b6"
/-!
# The field structure of rational functions
## Main definitions
Working with rational functions as polynomials:
- `RatFunc.instField` provides a field structure
You can use `IsFractionRing` API to treat `RatFunc` as the field of fractions of polynomials:
* `algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps polynomials to rational functions
* `IsFractionRing.algEquiv` maps other fields of fractions of `K[X]` to `RatFunc K`,
in particular:
* `FractionRing.algEquiv K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps the generic field of
fraction construction to `RatFunc K`. Combine this with `AlgEquiv.restrictScalars` to change
the `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K[X]] RatFunc K` to `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K] RatFunc K`.
Working with rational functions as fractions:
- `RatFunc.num` and `RatFunc.denom` give the numerator and denominator.
These values are chosen to be coprime and such that `RatFunc.denom` is monic.
Lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other types, by mapping and dividing, as long
as the homomorphism retains the non-zero-divisor property:
- `RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom` lifts a `K[X] →*₀ G₀` to
a `RatFunc K →*₀ G₀`, where `[CommRing K] [CommGroupWithZero G₀]`
- `RatFunc.liftRingHom` lifts a `K[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc K →+* L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L]`
- `RatFunc.liftAlgHom` lifts a `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] [Algebra S L]`
This is satisfied by injective homs.
We also have lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other polynomials,
with the same condition on retaining the non-zero-divisor property across the map:
- `RatFunc.map` lifts `K[X] →* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapRingHom` lifts `K[X] →+* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapAlgHom` lifts `K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]` when
`[CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]`
-/
universe u v
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Field
variable [CommRing K]
/-- The zero rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def zero : RatFunc K :=
⟨0⟩
#align ratfunc.zero RatFunc.zero
instance : Zero (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.zero⟩
-- Porting note: added `OfNat.ofNat`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [zero_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/Basic.lean | 75 | 76 | theorem ofFractionRing_zero : (ofFractionRing 0 : RatFunc K) = 0 := by |
simp only [Zero.zero, OfNat.ofNat, RatFunc.zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
#align real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
#align real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow Real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
#align real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul Real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
#align real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
#align real.rpow_add Real.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
#align real.rpow_add' Real.rpow_add'
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
#align real.rpow_add_of_nonneg Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
#align real.le_rpow_add Real.le_rpow_add
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
#align real.rpow_sum_of_pos Real.rpow_sum_of_pos
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
#align real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg Real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg Real.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub Real.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub' Real.rpow_sub'
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
#align complex.of_real_cpow Complex.ofReal_cpow
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, abs.map_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg,
arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx), ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
#align complex.of_real_cpow_of_nonpos Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(abs x ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [abs.pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = (abs x) ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = (abs x) ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem abs_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, abs_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (abs.pos hz)]
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero Complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero
theorem abs_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact abs_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [map_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, map_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_imp Complex.abs_cpow_of_imp
theorem abs_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : abs (z ^ w) ≤ abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (abs_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align complex.abs_cpow_le Complex.abs_cpow_le
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
#align complex.abs_cpow_real Complex.abs_cpow_real
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : abs (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← abs_cpow_real]; simp [-abs_cpow_real]
#align complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat Complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℂ) : abs (x ^ y) = x ^ y.re := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne'), arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le,
zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, div_one, abs_of_nonneg hx.le]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 343 | 345 | theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y : ℂ} (hy : re y ≠ 0) :
abs (x ^ y) = x ^ re y := by |
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp [*, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg, _root_.abs_of_nonneg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import order.filter.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
## Main definitions
* `Filter` : filters on a set;
* `Filter.principal` : filter of all sets containing a given set;
* `Filter.map`, `Filter.comap` : operations on filters;
* `Filter.Tendsto` : limit with respect to filters;
* `Filter.Eventually` : `f.eventually p` means `{x | p x} ∈ f`;
* `Filter.Frequently` : `f.frequently p` means `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`;
* `filter_upwards [h₁, ..., hₙ]` :
a tactic that takes a list of proofs `hᵢ : sᵢ ∈ f`,
and replaces a goal `s ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ s₁ → ... → x ∈ sₙ → x ∈ s`;
* `Filter.NeBot f` : a utility class stating that `f` is a non-trivial filter.
Filters on a type `X` are sets of sets of `X` satisfying three conditions. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
In this file, we define the type `Filter X` of filters on `X`, and endow it with a complete lattice
structure. This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The general notion of limit of a map with respect to filters on the source and target types
is `Filter.Tendsto`. It is defined in terms of the order and the push-forward operation.
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
For instance, anticipating on Topology.Basic, the statement: "if a sequence `u` converges to
some `x` and `u n` belongs to a set `M` for `n` large enough then `x` is in the closure of
`M`" is formalized as: `Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) → (∀ᶠ n in atTop, u n ∈ M) → x ∈ closure M`,
which is a special case of `mem_closure_of_tendsto` from Topology.Basic.
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set Order
open scoped Classical
universe u v w x y
/-- A filter `F` on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. We do not forbid this collection to be
all sets of `α`. -/
structure Filter (α : Type*) where
/-- The set of sets that belong to the filter. -/
sets : Set (Set α)
/-- The set `Set.univ` belongs to any filter. -/
univ_sets : Set.univ ∈ sets
/-- If a set belongs to a filter, then its superset belongs to the filter as well. -/
sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets
/-- If two sets belong to a filter, then their intersection belongs to the filter as well. -/
inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets
#align filter Filter
/-- If `F` is a filter on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ F` as on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*} : Membership (Set α) (Filter α) :=
⟨fun U F => U ∈ F.sets⟩
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_mk {t : Set (Set α)} {h₁ h₂ h₃} : s ∈ mk t h₁ h₂ h₃ ↔ s ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_mk Filter.mem_mk
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_sets : s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sets Filter.mem_sets
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
#align filter.inhabited_mem Filter.inhabitedMem
theorem filter_eq : ∀ {f g : Filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align filter.filter_eq Filter.filter_eq
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
#align filter.filter_eq_iff Filter.filter_eq_iff
protected theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g := by
simp only [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff, Filter.mem_sets]
#align filter.ext_iff Filter.ext_iff
@[ext]
protected theorem ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g) → f = g :=
Filter.ext_iff.2
#align filter.ext Filter.ext
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
#align filter.coext Filter.coext
@[simp]
theorem univ_mem : univ ∈ f :=
f.univ_sets
#align filter.univ_mem Filter.univ_mem
theorem mem_of_superset {x y : Set α} (hx : x ∈ f) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : y ∈ f :=
f.sets_of_superset hx hxy
#align filter.mem_of_superset Filter.mem_of_superset
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
theorem inter_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : s ∩ t ∈ f :=
f.inter_sets hs ht
#align filter.inter_mem Filter.inter_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_iff Filter.inter_mem_iff
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.diff_mem Filter.diff_mem
theorem univ_mem' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s) : s ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset univ_mem fun x _ => h x
#align filter.univ_mem' Filter.univ_mem'
theorem mp_mem (hs : s ∈ f) (h : { x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t } ∈ f) : t ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hs h) fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ h₁
#align filter.mp_mem Filter.mp_mem
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
#align filter.congr_sets Filter.congr_sets
/-- Override `sets` field of a filter to provide better definitional equality. -/
protected def copy (f : Filter α) (S : Set (Set α)) (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : Filter α where
sets := S
univ_sets := (hmem _).2 univ_mem
sets_of_superset h hsub := (hmem _).2 <| mem_of_superset ((hmem _).1 h) hsub
inter_sets h₁ h₂ := (hmem _).2 <| inter_mem ((hmem _).1 h₁) ((hmem _).1 h₂)
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
@[simp] lemma mem_copy {S hmem} : s ∈ f.copy S hmem ↔ s ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem biInter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Finite) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
Finite.induction_on hf (by simp) fun _ _ hs => by simp [hs]
#align filter.bInter_mem Filter.biInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem biInter_finset_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} (is : Finset β) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
biInter_mem is.finite_toSet
#align filter.bInter_finset_mem Filter.biInter_finset_mem
alias _root_.Finset.iInter_mem_sets := biInter_finset_mem
#align finset.Inter_mem_sets Finset.iInter_mem_sets
-- attribute [protected] Finset.iInter_mem_sets porting note: doesn't work
@[simp]
theorem sInter_mem {s : Set (Set α)} (hfin : s.Finite) : ⋂₀ s ∈ f ↔ ∀ U ∈ s, U ∈ f := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem hfin]
#align filter.sInter_mem Filter.sInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem iInter_mem {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Finite β] : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f :=
(sInter_mem (finite_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align filter.Inter_mem Filter.iInter_mem
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_subset_iff Filter.exists_mem_subset_iff
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
#align filter.monotone_mem Filter.monotone_mem
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_and_iff Filter.exists_mem_and_iff
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
#align filter.forall_in_swap Filter.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
/--
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f` and terms
`h₁ : t₁ ∈ f, ⋯, hₙ : tₙ ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ t₁ → ⋯ → x ∈ tₙ → x ∈ s`.
The list is an optional parameter, `[]` being its default value.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ], intros a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ }`.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] using e` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
Combining both shortcuts is done by writing `filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ using e`.
Note that in this case, the `aᵢ` terms can be used in `e`.
-/
syntax (name := filterUpwards) "filter_upwards" (" [" term,* "]")?
(" with" (ppSpace colGt term:max)*)? (" using " term)? : tactic
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| filter_upwards $[[$[$args],*]]? $[with $wth*]? $[using $usingArg]?) => do
let config : ApplyConfig := {newGoals := ApplyNewGoals.nonDependentOnly}
for e in args.getD #[] |>.reverse do
let goal ← getMainGoal
replaceMainGoal <| ← goal.withContext <| runTermElab do
let m ← mkFreshExprMVar none
let lem ← Term.elabTermEnsuringType
(← ``(Filter.mp_mem $e $(← Term.exprToSyntax m))) (← goal.getType)
goal.assign lem
return [m.mvarId!]
liftMetaTactic fun goal => do
goal.apply (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels ``Filter.univ_mem') config
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| dsimp (config := {zeta := false}) only [Set.mem_setOf_eq])
if let some l := wth then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| intro $[$l]*)
if let some e := usingArg then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| exact $e)
end Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
section Principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : Set α) : Filter α where
sets := { t | s ⊆ t }
univ_sets := subset_univ s
sets_of_superset hx := Subset.trans hx
inter_sets := subset_inter
#align filter.principal Filter.principal
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "𝓟" => Filter.principal
@[simp] theorem mem_principal {s t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓟 t ↔ t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal Filter.mem_principal
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal_self Filter.mem_principal_self
end Principal
open Filter
section Join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : Filter (Filter α)) : Filter α where
sets := { s | { t : Filter α | s ∈ t } ∈ f }
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, univ_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, setOf_true]
sets_of_superset hx xy := mem_of_superset hx fun f h => mem_of_superset h xy
inter_sets hx hy := mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx hy) fun f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => inter_mem h₁ h₂
#align filter.join Filter.join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {s : Set α} {f : Filter (Filter α)} : s ∈ join f ↔ { t | s ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_join Filter.mem_join
end Join
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance : PartialOrder (Filter α) where
le f g := ∀ ⦃U : Set α⦄, U ∈ g → U ∈ f
le_antisymm a b h₁ h₂ := filter_eq <| Subset.antisymm h₂ h₁
le_refl a := Subset.rfl
le_trans a b c h₁ h₂ := Subset.trans h₂ h₁
theorem le_def : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g, x ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.le_def Filter.le_def
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align filter.not_le Filter.not_le
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
#align filter.generate_sets Filter.GenerateSets
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
#align filter.generate Filter.generate
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
#align filter.sets_iff_generate Filter.le_generate_iff
theorem mem_generate_iff {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} :
U ∈ generate s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, Set.Finite t ∧ ⋂₀ t ⊆ U := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction h with
| @basic V V_in =>
exact ⟨{V}, singleton_subset_iff.2 V_in, finite_singleton _, (sInter_singleton _).subset⟩
| univ => exact ⟨∅, empty_subset _, finite_empty, subset_univ _⟩
| superset _ hVW hV =>
rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, ht, htV.trans hVW⟩
| inter _ _ hV hW =>
rcases hV, hW with ⟨⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩, u, hus, hu, huW⟩
exact
⟨t ∪ u, union_subset hts hus, ht.union hu,
(sInter_union _ _).subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter htV huW⟩
· rcases h with ⟨t, hts, tfin, h⟩
exact mem_of_superset ((sInter_mem tfin).2 fun V hV => GenerateSets.basic <| hts hV) h
#align filter.mem_generate_iff Filter.mem_generate_iff
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
#align filter.mk_of_closure Filter.mkOfClosure
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.mk_of_closure_sets Filter.mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
#align filter.gi_generate Filter.giGenerate
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : Inf (Filter α) :=
⟨fun f g : Filter α =>
{ sets := { s | ∃ a ∈ f, ∃ b ∈ g, s = a ∩ b }
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem, _, univ_mem, by simp⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ xy
refine
⟨a ∪ y, mem_of_superset ha subset_union_left, b ∪ y,
mem_of_superset hb subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_union_distrib_right, union_eq_self_of_subset_left xy]
inter_sets := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a ∩ c, inter_mem ha hc, b ∩ d, inter_mem hb hd, ?_⟩
ac_rfl }⟩
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_inf_iff Filter.mem_inf_iff
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_left Filter.mem_inf_of_left
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_right Filter.mem_inf_of_right
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_inf Filter.inter_mem_inf
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
#align filter.mem_inf_of_inter Filter.mem_inf_of_inter
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_iff_superset Filter.mem_inf_iff_superset
instance : Top (Filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := { s | ∀ x, x ∈ s }
univ_sets := fun x => mem_univ x
sets_of_superset := fun hx hxy a => hxy (hx a)
inter_sets := fun hx hy _ => mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
theorem mem_top_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_top_iff_forall Filter.mem_top_iff_forall
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ s = univ := by
rw [mem_top_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.mem_top Filter.mem_top
section CompleteLattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for some lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) :=
{ @OrderDual.instCompleteLattice _ (giGenerate α).liftCompleteLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _s hs => (mem_top.1 hs).symm ▸ univ_mem
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
sSup := join ∘ 𝓟
le_sSup := fun _ _f hf _s hs => hs hf
sSup_le := fun _ _f hf _s hs _g hg => hf _ hg hs }
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
/-- A filter is `NeBot` if it is not equal to `⊥`, or equivalently the empty set does not belong to
the filter. Bourbaki include this assumption in the definition of a filter but we prefer to have a
`CompleteLattice` structure on `Filter _`, so we use a typeclass argument in lemmas instead. -/
class NeBot (f : Filter α) : Prop where
/-- The filter is nontrivial: `f ≠ ⊥` or equivalently, `∅ ∉ f`. -/
ne' : f ≠ ⊥
#align filter.ne_bot Filter.NeBot
theorem neBot_iff {f : Filter α} : NeBot f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align filter.ne_bot_iff Filter.neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
#align filter.ne_bot.ne Filter.NeBot.ne
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
#align filter.not_ne_bot Filter.not_neBot
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.mono Filter.NeBot.mono
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
#align filter.ne_bot_of_le Filter.neBot_of_le
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.sup_ne_bot Filter.sup_neBot
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
#align filter.not_disjoint_self_iff Filter.not_disjoint_self_iff
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
#align filter.bot_sets_eq Filter.bot_sets_eq
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
#align filter.sup_sets_eq Filter.sup_sets_eq
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
#align filter.Sup_sets_eq Filter.sSup_sets_eq
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
#align filter.supr_sets_eq Filter.iSup_sets_eq
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
#align filter.generate_empty Filter.generate_empty
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
#align filter.generate_univ Filter.generate_univ
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
#align filter.generate_union Filter.generate_union
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
#align filter.generate_Union Filter.generate_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : Filter α) :=
trivial
#align filter.mem_bot Filter.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sup Filter.mem_sup
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
#align filter.union_mem_sup Filter.union_mem_sup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {x : Set α} {s : Set (Filter α)} : x ∈ sSup s ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, x ∈ (f : Filter α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_Sup Filter.mem_sSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter]
#align filter.mem_supr Filter.mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
#align filter.supr_ne_bot Filter.iSup_neBot
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
show generate _ = generate _ from congr_arg _ <| congr_arg sSup <| (range_comp _ _).symm
#align filter.infi_eq_generate Filter.iInf_eq_generate
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
#align filter.mem_infi_of_mem Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem
theorem mem_iInf_of_iInter {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} {I : Set ι} (I_fin : I.Finite)
{V : I → Set α} (hV : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i) (hU : ⋂ i, V i ⊆ U) : U ∈ ⨅ i, s i := by
haveI := I_fin.fintype
refine mem_of_superset (iInter_mem.2 fun i => ?_) hU
exact mem_iInf_of_mem (i : ι) (hV _)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_Inter Filter.mem_iInf_of_iInter
theorem mem_iInf {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔ ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : I → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
constructor
· rw [iInf_eq_generate, mem_generate_iff]
rintro ⟨t, tsub, tfin, tinter⟩
rcases eq_finite_iUnion_of_finite_subset_iUnion tfin tsub with ⟨I, Ifin, σ, σfin, σsub, rfl⟩
rw [sInter_iUnion] at tinter
set V := fun i => U ∪ ⋂₀ σ i with hV
have V_in : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i := by
rintro i
have : ⋂₀ σ i ∈ s i := by
rw [sInter_mem (σfin _)]
apply σsub
exact mem_of_superset this subset_union_right
refine ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, ?_⟩
rwa [hV, ← union_iInter, union_eq_self_of_subset_right]
· rintro ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInf_of_iInter Ifin V_in Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_infi Filter.mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf' {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔
∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : ι → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧
(∀ i ∉ I, V i = univ) ∧ (U = ⋂ i ∈ I, V i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
simp only [mem_iInf, SetCoe.forall', biInter_eq_iInter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨I, If, V, hVs, _, hVU, _⟩ => ⟨I, If, fun i => V i, fun i => hVs i, hVU⟩⟩
rintro ⟨I, If, V, hV, rfl⟩
refine ⟨I, If, fun i => if hi : i ∈ I then V ⟨i, hi⟩ else univ, fun i => ?_, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [hV _, univ_mem]
· exact dif_neg hi
· simp only [iInter_dite, biInter_eq_iInter, dif_pos (Subtype.coe_prop _), Subtype.coe_eta,
iInter_univ, inter_univ, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
#align filter.mem_infi' Filter.mem_iInf'
theorem exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} {s}
(hs : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) : ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i :=
let ⟨_, _, V, hVs, _, _, hVU'⟩ := mem_iInf'.1 hs; ⟨V, hVs, hVU'⟩
#align filter.exists_Inter_of_mem_infi Filter.exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf_of_finite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
(s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i := by
refine ⟨exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun i => mem_iInf_of_mem i (ht i)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_finite Filter.mem_iInf_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
#align filter.le_principal_iff Filter.le_principal_iff
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
#align filter.Iic_principal Filter.Iic_principal
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, iff_self_iff, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_mono Filter.principal_mono
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
#align filter.monotone_principal Filter.monotone_principal
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
#align filter.principal_eq_iff_eq Filter.principal_eq_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
#align filter.join_principal_eq_Sup Filter.join_principal_eq_sSup
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.principal_univ Filter.principal_univ
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
#align filter.principal_empty Filter.principal_empty
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
#align filter.generate_eq_binfi Filter.generate_eq_biInf
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
#align filter.empty_mem_iff_bot Filter.empty_mem_iff_bot
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
#align filter.nonempty_of_mem Filter.nonempty_of_mem
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
#align filter.ne_bot.nonempty_of_mem Filter.NeBot.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
#align filter.empty_not_mem Filter.empty_not_mem
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
#align filter.nonempty_of_ne_bot Filter.nonempty_of_neBot
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
#align filter.compl_not_mem Filter.compl_not_mem
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
#align filter.filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty Filter.filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
#align filter.disjoint_iff Filter.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem Filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.not_disjoint Filter.NeBot.not_disjoint
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
#align filter.inf_eq_bot_iff Filter.inf_eq_bot_iff
theorem _root_.Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {l : ι → Filter α}
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on l)) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on s) := by
have : Pairwise fun i j => ∃ (s : {s // s ∈ l i}) (t : {t // t ∈ l j}), Disjoint s.1 t.1 := by
simpa only [Pairwise, Function.onFun, Filter.disjoint_iff, exists_prop, Subtype.exists] using hd
choose! s t hst using this
refine ⟨fun i => ⋂ j, @s i j ∩ @t j i, fun i => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exacts [iInter_mem.2 fun j => inter_mem (@s i j).2 (@t j i).2,
(hst hij).mono ((iInter_subset _ j).trans inter_subset_left)
((iInter_subset _ i).trans inter_subset_right)]
#align pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter {ι : Type*} {l : ι → Filter α} {t : Set ι}
(hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint l) (ht : t.Finite) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ t.PairwiseDisjoint s := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rcases (hd.subtype _ _).exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint with ⟨s, hsl, hsd⟩
lift s to (i : t) → {s // s ∈ l i} using hsl
rcases @Subtype.exists_pi_extension ι (fun i => { s // s ∈ l i }) _ _ s with ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun i => s i, fun i => (s i).2, hsd.set_of_subtype _ _⟩
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.exists_mem_filter Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
#align filter.unique Filter.unique
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
#align filter.eq_top_of_ne_bot Filter.eq_top_of_neBot
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
#align filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot Filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, NeBot.ne <| forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1
fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
#align filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty Filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
#align filter.eq_Inf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans exists_range_iff.symm
#align filter.eq_infi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
#align filter.eq_binfi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_memₓ
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
-- Porting note: it was just `congr_arg filter.sets this.symm`
(congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm).trans <| by simp only
#align filter.infi_sets_eq Filter.iInf_sets_eq
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
#align filter.mem_infi_of_directed Filter.mem_iInf_of_directed
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
#align filter.mem_binfi_of_directed Filter.mem_biInf_of_directed
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
#align filter.binfi_sets_eq Filter.biInf_sets_eq
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset ι, (⨅ i ∈ t, f i).sets := by
rw [iInf_eq_iInf_finset, iInf_sets_eq]
exact directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ => biInf_mono
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite' (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset (PLift ι), (⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i)).sets := by
rw [← iInf_sets_eq_finite, ← Equiv.plift.surjective.iInf_comp, Equiv.plift_apply]
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite' Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite'
theorem mem_iInf_finite {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset ι, s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f i :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite Filter.mem_iInf_finite
theorem mem_iInf_finite' {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset (PLift ι), s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i) :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite' f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite' Filter.mem_iInf_finite'
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
#align filter.sup_join Filter.sup_join
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
#align filter.supr_join Filter.iSup_join
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
-- The dual version does not hold! `Filter α` is not a `CompleteDistribLattice`. -/
instance : Coframe (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf := fun f s t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [iInf_subtype']
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_sets_eq_finite, mem_iUnion] at h₂
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := h₂
rw [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hu
suffices ⨅ i : s, f ⊔ ↑i ≤ f ⊔ u.inf fun i => ↑i from this ⟨h₁, hu⟩
refine Finset.induction_on u (le_sup_of_le_right le_top) ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ u _ ih
rw [Finset.inf_insert, sup_inf_left]
exact le_inf (iInf_le _ _) ih }
theorem mem_iInf_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Filter β} {t : Set β} :
(t ∈ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) ↔ ∃ p : α → Set β, (∀ a ∈ s, p a ∈ f a) ∧ t = ⋂ a ∈ s, p a := by
simp only [← Finset.set_biInter_coe, biInter_eq_iInter, iInf_subtype']
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases (mem_iInf_of_finite _).1 h with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
refine ⟨fun a => if h : a ∈ s then p ⟨a, h⟩ else univ,
fun a ha => by simpa [ha] using hp ⟨a, ha⟩, ?_⟩
refine iInter_congr_of_surjective id surjective_id ?_
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
simp [ha]
· rintro ⟨p, hpf, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun a => mem_iInf_of_mem a (hpf a a.2)
#align filter.mem_infi_finset Filter.mem_iInf_finset
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed'
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed'
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed'
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iInf_sets_induct {f : ι → Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ iInf f) {p : Set α → Prop}
(uni : p univ) (ins : ∀ {i s₁ s₂}, s₁ ∈ f i → p s₂ → p (s₁ ∩ s₂)) : p s := by
rw [mem_iInf_finite'] at hs
simp only [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨is, his⟩
induction is using Finset.induction_on generalizing s with
| empty => rwa [mem_top.1 his]
| insert _ ih =>
rw [Finset.inf_insert, mem_inf_iff] at his
rcases his with ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, rfl⟩
exact ins hs₁ (ih hs₂)
#align filter.infi_sets_induct Filter.iInf_sets_induct
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
#align filter.inf_principal Filter.inf_principal
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
#align filter.sup_principal Filter.sup_principal
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
#align filter.supr_principal Filter.iSup_principal
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
#align filter.principal_eq_bot_iff Filter.principal_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align filter.principal_ne_bot_iff Filter.principal_neBot_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
#align set.nonempty.principal_ne_bot Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
#align filter.is_compl_principal Filter.isCompl_principal
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal' Filter.mem_inf_principal'
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal Filter.mem_inf_principal
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
#align filter.supr_inf_principal Filter.iSup_inf_principal
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
#align filter.mem_of_eq_bot Filter.mem_of_eq_bot
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
#align filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl Filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_le_iff Filter.principal_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal_finset {ι : Type w} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs
· simp
· rw [Finset.iInf_insert, Finset.set_biInter_insert, hs, inf_principal]
#align filter.infi_principal_finset Filter.iInf_principal_finset
theorem iInf_principal {ι : Sort w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype (PLift ι)
rw [← iInf_plift_down, ← iInter_plift_down]
simpa using iInf_principal_finset Finset.univ (f <| PLift.down ·)
/-- A special case of `iInf_principal` that is safe to mark `simp`. -/
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal' {ι : Type w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) :=
iInf_principal _
#align filter.infi_principal Filter.iInf_principal
theorem iInf_principal_finite {ι : Type w} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
lift s to Finset ι using hs
exact mod_cast iInf_principal_finset s f
#align filter.infi_principal_finite Filter.iInf_principal_finite
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
#align filter.join_mono Filter.join_mono
/-! ### Eventually -/
/-- `f.Eventually p` or `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | p x} ∈ f`. E.g., `∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that `p` holds true for sufficiently large `x`. -/
protected def Eventually (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
{ x | p x } ∈ f
#align filter.eventually Filter.Eventually
@[inherit_doc Filter.Eventually]
notation3 "∀ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p f) => r
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_iff Filter.eventually_iff
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_mem_set Filter.eventually_mem_set
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
#align filter.ext' Filter.ext'
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
#align filter.eventually.filter_mono Filter.Eventually.filter_mono
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
#align filter.eventually_of_mem Filter.eventually_of_mem
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
#align filter.eventually.and Filter.Eventually.and
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
#align filter.eventually_true Filter.eventually_true
theorem eventually_of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
#align filter.eventually_of_forall Filter.eventually_of_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
#align filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot Filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
#align filter.eventually_const Filter.eventually_const
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
#align filter.eventually.exists_mem Filter.Eventually.exists_mem
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
#align filter.eventually.mp Filter.Eventually.mp
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (eventually_of_forall hq)
#align filter.eventually.mono Filter.Eventually.mono
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
#align filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall Filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
#align filter.eventually_and Filter.eventually_and
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
#align filter.eventually.congr Filter.Eventually.congr
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
#align filter.eventually_congr Filter.eventually_congr
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p i x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using iInter_mem
#align filter.eventually_all Filter.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all_finite {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using biInter_mem hI
#align filter.eventually_all_finite Filter.eventually_all_finite
alias _root_.Set.Finite.eventually_all := eventually_all_finite
#align set.finite.eventually_all Set.Finite.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Set.Finite.eventually_all
@[simp] theorem eventually_all_finset {ι} (I : Finset ι) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x :=
I.finite_toSet.eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_all_finset Filter.eventually_all_finset
alias _root_.Finset.eventually_all := eventually_all_finset
#align finset.eventually_all Finset.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Finset.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_left Filter.eventually_or_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_right Filter.eventually_or_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
#align filter.eventually_bot Filter.eventually_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_top Filter.eventually_top
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_sup Filter.eventually_sup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_Sup Filter.eventually_sSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
#align filter.eventually_supr Filter.eventually_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_principal Filter.eventually_principal
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
#align filter.eventually_inf Filter.eventually_inf
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_inf_principal Filter.eventually_inf_principal
/-! ### Frequently -/
/-- `f.Frequently p` or `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`. E.g., `∃ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that there exist arbitrarily large `x` for which `p` holds true. -/
protected def Frequently (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
¬∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x
#align filter.frequently Filter.Frequently
@[inherit_doc Filter.Frequently]
notation3 "∃ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Frequently p f) => r
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
#align filter.eventually.frequently Filter.Eventually.frequently
theorem frequently_of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (eventually_of_forall h)
#align filter.frequently_of_forall Filter.frequently_of_forall
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
#align filter.frequently.mp Filter.Frequently.mp
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
#align filter.frequently.filter_mono Filter.Frequently.filter_mono
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (eventually_of_forall hpq)
#align filter.frequently.mono Filter.Frequently.mono
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
#align filter.frequently.and_eventually Filter.Frequently.and_eventually
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
#align filter.eventually.and_frequently Filter.Eventually.and_frequently
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := eventually_of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
#align filter.frequently.exists Filter.Frequently.exists
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
#align filter.eventually.exists Filter.Eventually.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp q hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
#align filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and Filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
#align filter.frequently_iff Filter.frequently_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.not_eventually Filter.not_eventually
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
#align filter.not_frequently Filter.not_frequently
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
#align filter.frequently_true_iff_ne_bot Filter.frequently_true_iff_neBot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
#align filter.frequently_false Filter.frequently_false
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align filter.frequently_const Filter.frequently_const
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib Filter.frequently_or_distrib
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_left Filter.frequently_or_distrib_left
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_right Filter.frequently_or_distrib_right
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib Filter.frequently_imp_distrib
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_left Filter.frequently_and_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_right Filter.frequently_and_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_bot Filter.frequently_bot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.frequently_top Filter.frequently_top
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
#align filter.frequently_principal Filter.frequently_principal
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
#align filter.frequently_sup Filter.frequently_sup
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
#align filter.frequently_Sup Filter.frequently_sSup
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
#align filter.frequently_supr Filter.frequently_iSup
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
#align filter.eventually.choice Filter.Eventually.choice
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
/-- Two functions `f` and `g` are *eventually equal* along a filter `l` if the set of `x` such that
`f x = g x` belongs to `l`. -/
def EventuallyEq (l : Filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x
#align filter.eventually_eq Filter.EventuallyEq
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 f " =ᶠ[" l:50 "] " g:50 => EventuallyEq l f g
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x :=
h
#align filter.eventually_eq.eventually Filter.EventuallyEq.eventually
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.rw Filter.EventuallyEq.rw
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| eventually_of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
#align filter.eventually_eq_set Filter.eventuallyEq_set
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
#align filter.eventually_eq.mem_iff Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_iff
#align filter.eventually.set_eq Filter.Eventually.set_eq
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
#align filter.eventually_eq_univ Filter.eventuallyEq_univ
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
#align filter.eventually_eq.exists_mem Filter.EventuallyEq.exists_mem
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
#align filter.eventually_eq_of_mem Filter.eventuallyEq_of_mem
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
#align filter.eventually_eq_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
#align filter.eventually_eq.filter_mono Filter.EventuallyEq.filter_mono
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.refl Filter.EventuallyEq.refl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
#align filter.eventually_eq.rfl Filter.EventuallyEq.rfl
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.symm Filter.EventuallyEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans Filter.EventuallyEq.trans
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prod_mk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
#align filter.eventually_eq.prod_mk Filter.EventuallyEq.prod_mk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
#align filter.eventually_eq.fun_comp Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prod_mk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
#align filter.eventually_eq.comp₂ Filter.EventuallyEq.comp₂
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.mul Filter.EventuallyEq.mul
#align filter.eventually_eq.add Filter.EventuallyEq.add
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ):
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
#align filter.eventually_eq.const_smul Filter.EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
#align filter.eventually_eq.inv Filter.EventuallyEq.inv
#align filter.eventually_eq.neg Filter.EventuallyEq.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.div Filter.EventuallyEq.div
#align filter.eventually_eq.sub Filter.EventuallyEq.sub
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
#align filter.eventually_eq.const_vadd Filter.EventuallyEq.const_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.smul Filter.EventuallyEq.smul
#align filter.eventually_eq.vadd Filter.EventuallyEq.vadd
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Sup β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.sup Filter.EventuallyEq.sup
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Inf β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.inf Filter.EventuallyEq.inf
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
#align filter.eventually_eq.preimage Filter.EventuallyEq.preimage
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.inter Filter.EventuallyEq.inter
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.union Filter.EventuallyEq.union
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
#align filter.eventually_eq.compl Filter.EventuallyEq.compl
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
#align filter.eventually_eq.diff Filter.EventuallyEq.diff
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
#align filter.eventually_eq_empty Filter.eventuallyEq_empty
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
#align filter.inter_eventually_eq_left Filter.inter_eventuallyEq_left
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
#align filter.inter_eventually_eq_right Filter.inter_eventuallyEq_right
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq_principal Filter.eventuallyEq_principal
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_eq_inf_principal_iff Filter.eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.sub_eq Filter.EventuallyEq.sub_eq
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
#align filter.eventually_eq_iff_sub Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_sub
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
/-- A function `f` is eventually less than or equal to a function `g` at a filter `l`. -/
def EventuallyLE (l : Filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x
#align filter.eventually_le Filter.EventuallyLE
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 f " ≤ᶠ[" l:50 "] " g:50 => EventuallyLE l f g
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
#align filter.eventually_le.congr Filter.EventuallyLE.congr
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
#align filter.eventually_le_congr Filter.eventuallyLE_congr
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
#align filter.eventually_eq.le Filter.EventuallyEq.le
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
#align filter.eventually_le.refl Filter.EventuallyLE.refl
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
#align filter.eventually_le.rfl Filter.EventuallyLE.rfl
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
#align filter.eventually_le.trans Filter.EventuallyLE.trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_le Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_le
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
#align filter.eventually_le.trans_eq Filter.EventuallyLE.trans_eq
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
#align filter.eventually_le.antisymm Filter.EventuallyLE.antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
#align filter.eventually_le_antisymm_iff Filter.eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
#align filter.eventually_le.le_iff_eq Filter.EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
#align filter.eventually.ne_of_lt Filter.Eventually.ne_of_lt
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
#align filter.eventually.ne_top_of_lt Filter.Eventually.ne_top_of_lt
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
#align filter.eventually.lt_top_of_ne Filter.Eventually.lt_top_of_ne
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
#align filter.eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top Filter.Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
#align filter.eventually_le.inter Filter.EventuallyLE.inter
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
#align filter.eventually_le.union Filter.EventuallyLE.union
protected lemma EventuallyLE.iUnion [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋃ i, s i) ≤ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(eventually_all.2 h).mono fun _x hx hx' ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 hx'; mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hx i hi⟩
protected lemma EventuallyEq.iUnion [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋃ i, s i) =ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.iUnion fun i ↦ (h i).le).antisymm <| .iUnion fun i ↦ (h i).symm.le
protected lemma EventuallyLE.iInter [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋂ i, s i) ≤ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(eventually_all.2 h).mono fun _x hx hx' ↦ mem_iInter.2 fun i ↦ hx i (mem_iInter.1 hx' i)
protected lemma EventuallyEq.iInter [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋂ i, s i) =ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.iInter fun i ↦ (h i).le).antisymm <| .iInter fun i ↦ (h i).symm.le
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact .iUnion fun i ↦ hle i.1 i.2
alias EventuallyLE.biUnion := Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
(EventuallyLE.biUnion hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).le).antisymm <|
.biUnion hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).symm.le
alias EventuallyEq.biUnion := Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biInter_eq_iInter, biInter_eq_iInter]
exact .iInter fun i ↦ hle i.1 i.2
alias EventuallyLE.biInter := Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iInter
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
(EventuallyLE.biInter hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).le).antisymm <|
.biInter hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).symm.le
alias EventuallyEq.biInter := Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iInter
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyLE_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biUnion s.finite_toSet hle
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyEq_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biUnion s.finite_toSet heq
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyLE_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biInter s.finite_toSet hle
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyEq_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biInter s.finite_toSet heq
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
#align filter.eventually_le.compl Filter.EventuallyLE.compl
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
#align filter.eventually_le.diff Filter.EventuallyLE.diff
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
#align filter.set_eventually_le_iff_mem_inf_principal Filter.set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and_iff, le_principal_iff]
#align filter.set_eventually_le_iff_inf_principal_le Filter.set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
#align filter.set_eventually_eq_iff_inf_principal Filter.set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul [MulZeroClass β] [PartialOrder β] [PosMulMono β] [MulPosMono β]
{l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) (hg₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g₁)
(hf₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg, hg₀, hf₀] with x using _root_.mul_le_mul
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_le_mul Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul
@[to_additive EventuallyLE.add_le_add]
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul' [Mul β] [Preorder β] [CovariantClass β β (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)]
[CovariantClass β β (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β}
(hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.mul_le_mul' hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_le_mul' Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul'
#align filter.eventually_le.add_le_add Filter.EventuallyLE.add_le_add
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_nonneg [OrderedSemiring β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f)
(hg : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g) : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f * g := by filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x using _root_.mul_nonneg
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_nonneg Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_nonneg
theorem eventually_sub_nonneg [OrderedRing β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
0 ≤ᶠ[l] g - f ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_congr <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => sub_nonneg
#align filter.eventually_sub_nonneg Filter.eventually_sub_nonneg
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.sup Filter.EventuallyLE.sup
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.sup_le Filter.EventuallyLE.sup_le
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
#align filter.eventually_le.le_sup_of_le_left Filter.EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
#align filter.eventually_le.le_sup_of_le_right Filter.EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
#align filter.join_le Filter.join_le
/-! ### Push-forwards, pull-backs, and the monad structure -/
section Map
/-- The forward map of a filter -/
def map (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := preimage m ⁻¹' f.sets
univ_sets := univ_mem
sets_of_superset hs st := mem_of_superset hs <| preimage_mono st
inter_sets hs ht := inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.map Filter.map
@[simp]
theorem map_principal {s : Set α} {f : α → β} : map f (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (Set.image f s) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => image_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.map_principal Filter.map_principal
variable {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
@[simp]
theorem eventually_map {P : β → Prop} : (∀ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∀ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_map Filter.eventually_map
@[simp]
theorem frequently_map {P : β → Prop} : (∃ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∃ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.frequently_map Filter.frequently_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map : t ∈ map m f ↔ m ⁻¹' t ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map Filter.mem_map
theorem mem_map' : t ∈ map m f ↔ { x | m x ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map' Filter.mem_map'
theorem image_mem_map (hs : s ∈ f) : m '' s ∈ map m f :=
f.sets_of_superset hs <| subset_preimage_image m s
#align filter.image_mem_map Filter.image_mem_map
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Filter.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem image_mem_map_iff (hf : Injective m) : m '' s ∈ map m f ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← preimage_image_eq s hf], image_mem_map⟩
#align filter.image_mem_map_iff Filter.image_mem_map_iff
theorem range_mem_map : range m ∈ map m f := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact image_mem_map univ_mem
#align filter.range_mem_map Filter.range_mem_map
theorem mem_map_iff_exists_image : t ∈ map m f ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, m '' s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun ht => ⟨m ⁻¹' t, ht, image_preimage_subset _ _⟩, fun ⟨_, hs, ht⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (image_mem_map hs) ht⟩
#align filter.mem_map_iff_exists_image Filter.mem_map_iff_exists_image
@[simp]
theorem map_id : Filter.map id f = f :=
filter_eq <| rfl
#align filter.map_id Filter.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : Filter.map (fun x => x) f = f :=
map_id
#align filter.map_id' Filter.map_id'
@[simp]
theorem map_compose : Filter.map m' ∘ Filter.map m = Filter.map (m' ∘ m) :=
funext fun _ => filter_eq <| rfl
#align filter.map_compose Filter.map_compose
@[simp]
theorem map_map : Filter.map m' (Filter.map m f) = Filter.map (m' ∘ m) f :=
congr_fun Filter.map_compose f
#align filter.map_map Filter.map_map
/-- If functions `m₁` and `m₂` are eventually equal at a filter `f`, then
they map this filter to the same filter. -/
theorem map_congr {m₁ m₂ : α → β} {f : Filter α} (h : m₁ =ᶠ[f] m₂) : map m₁ f = map m₂ f :=
Filter.ext' fun _ => eventually_congr (h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl)
#align filter.map_congr Filter.map_congr
end Map
section Comap
/-- The inverse map of a filter. A set `s` belongs to `Filter.comap m f` if either of the following
equivalent conditions hold.
1. There exists a set `t ∈ f` such that `m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s`. This is used as a definition.
2. The set `kernImage m s = {y | ∀ x, m x = y → x ∈ s}` belongs to `f`, see `Filter.mem_comap'`.
3. The set `(m '' sᶜ)ᶜ` belongs to `f`, see `Filter.mem_comap_iff_compl` and
`Filter.compl_mem_comap`. -/
def comap (m : α → β) (f : Filter β) : Filter α where
sets := { s | ∃ t ∈ f, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s }
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, by simp only [subset_univ, preimage_univ]⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab => ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩ =>
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁, inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂⟩
#align filter.comap Filter.comap
variable {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α}
theorem mem_comap' : s ∈ comap f l ↔ { y | ∀ ⦃x⦄, f x = y → x ∈ s } ∈ l :=
⟨fun ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht fun y hy x hx => hts <| mem_preimage.2 <| by rwa [hx],
fun h => ⟨_, h, fun x hx => hx rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.mem_comap' Filter.mem_comap'
-- TODO: it would be nice to use `kernImage` much more to take advantage of common name and API,
-- and then this would become `mem_comap'`
theorem mem_comap'' : s ∈ comap f l ↔ kernImage f s ∈ l :=
mem_comap'
/-- RHS form is used, e.g., in the definition of `UniformSpace`. -/
lemma mem_comap_prod_mk {x : α} {s : Set β} {F : Filter (α × β)} :
s ∈ comap (Prod.mk x) F ↔ {p : α × β | p.fst = x → p.snd ∈ s} ∈ F := by
simp_rw [mem_comap', Prod.ext_iff, and_imp, @forall_swap β (_ = _), forall_eq, eq_comm]
#align filter.mem_comap_prod_mk Filter.mem_comap_prod_mk
@[simp]
theorem eventually_comap : (∀ᶠ a in comap f l, p a) ↔ ∀ᶠ b in l, ∀ a, f a = b → p a :=
mem_comap'
#align filter.eventually_comap Filter.eventually_comap
@[simp]
theorem frequently_comap : (∃ᶠ a in comap f l, p a) ↔ ∃ᶠ b in l, ∃ a, f a = b ∧ p a := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_comap, not_exists, _root_.not_and]
#align filter.frequently_comap Filter.frequently_comap
theorem mem_comap_iff_compl : s ∈ comap f l ↔ (f '' sᶜ)ᶜ ∈ l := by
simp only [mem_comap'', kernImage_eq_compl]
#align filter.mem_comap_iff_compl Filter.mem_comap_iff_compl
theorem compl_mem_comap : sᶜ ∈ comap f l ↔ (f '' s)ᶜ ∈ l := by rw [mem_comap_iff_compl, compl_compl]
#align filter.compl_mem_comap Filter.compl_mem_comap
end Comap
section KernMap
/-- The analog of `kernImage` for filters. A set `s` belongs to `Filter.kernMap m f` if either of
the following equivalent conditions hold.
1. There exists a set `t ∈ f` such that `s = kernImage m t`. This is used as a definition.
2. There exists a set `t` such that `tᶜ ∈ f` and `sᶜ = m '' t`, see `Filter.mem_kernMap_iff_compl`
and `Filter.compl_mem_kernMap`.
This definition because it gives a right adjoint to `Filter.comap`, and because it has a nice
interpretation when working with `co-` filters (`Filter.cocompact`, `Filter.cofinite`, ...).
For example, `kernMap m (cocompact α)` is the filter generated by the complements of the sets
`m '' K` where `K` is a compact subset of `α`. -/
def kernMap (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := (kernImage m) '' f.sets
univ_sets := ⟨univ, f.univ_sets, by simp [kernImage_eq_compl]⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro _ t ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩ hst
refine ⟨s ∪ m ⁻¹' t, mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [kernImage_union_preimage, union_eq_right.mpr hst]
inter_sets := by
rintro _ _ ⟨s₁, h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁ ∩ s₂, f.inter_sets h₁ h₂, Set.preimage_kernImage.u_inf⟩
variable {m : α → β} {f : Filter α}
theorem mem_kernMap {s : Set β} : s ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, kernImage m t = s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_kernMap_iff_compl {s : Set β} : s ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t, tᶜ ∈ f ∧ m '' t = sᶜ := by
rw [mem_kernMap, compl_surjective.exists]
refine exists_congr (fun x ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦ ?_)
rw [kernImage_compl, compl_eq_comm, eq_comm]
theorem compl_mem_kernMap {s : Set β} : sᶜ ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t, tᶜ ∈ f ∧ m '' t = s := by
simp_rw [mem_kernMap_iff_compl, compl_compl]
end KernMap
/-- The monadic bind operation on filter is defined the usual way in terms of `map` and `join`.
Unfortunately, this `bind` does not result in the expected applicative. See `Filter.seq` for the
applicative instance. -/
def bind (f : Filter α) (m : α → Filter β) : Filter β :=
join (map m f)
#align filter.bind Filter.bind
/-- The applicative sequentiation operation. This is not induced by the bind operation. -/
def seq (f : Filter (α → β)) (g : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := { s | ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ m ∈ u, ∀ x ∈ t, (m : α → β) x ∈ s }
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, univ, univ_mem, fun _ _ _ _ => trivial⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, h⟩ hst =>
⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, fun _ hx _ hy => hst <| h _ hx _ hy⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨t₀, ht₀, t₁, ht₁, ht⟩ ⟨u₀, hu₀, u₁, hu₁, hu⟩ =>
⟨t₀ ∩ u₀, inter_mem ht₀ hu₀, t₁ ∩ u₁, inter_mem ht₁ hu₁, fun _ ⟨hx₀, hx₁⟩ _ ⟨hy₀, hy₁⟩ =>
⟨ht _ hx₀ _ hy₀, hu _ hx₁ _ hy₁⟩⟩
#align filter.seq Filter.seq
/-- `pure x` is the set of sets that contain `x`. It is equal to `𝓟 {x}` but
with this definition we have `s ∈ pure a` defeq `a ∈ s`. -/
instance : Pure Filter :=
⟨fun x =>
{ sets := { s | x ∈ s }
inter_sets := And.intro
sets_of_superset := fun hs hst => hst hs
univ_sets := trivial }⟩
instance : Bind Filter :=
⟨@Filter.bind⟩
instance : Functor Filter where map := @Filter.map
instance : LawfulFunctor (Filter : Type u → Type u) where
id_map _ := map_id
comp_map _ _ _ := map_map.symm
map_const := rfl
theorem pure_sets (a : α) : (pure a : Filter α).sets = { s | a ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align filter.pure_sets Filter.pure_sets
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ (pure a : Filter α) ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_pure Filter.mem_pure
@[simp]
theorem eventually_pure {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in pure a, p x) ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_pure Filter.eventually_pure
@[simp]
theorem principal_singleton (a : α) : 𝓟 {a} = pure a :=
Filter.ext fun s => by simp only [mem_pure, mem_principal, singleton_subset_iff]
#align filter.principal_singleton Filter.principal_singleton
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
#align filter.map_pure Filter.map_pure
theorem pure_le_principal (a : α) : pure a ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp
@[simp] theorem join_pure (f : Filter α) : join (pure f) = f := rfl
#align filter.join_pure Filter.join_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_bind (a : α) (m : α → Filter β) : bind (pure a) m = m a := by
simp only [Bind.bind, bind, map_pure, join_pure]
#align filter.pure_bind Filter.pure_bind
theorem map_bind {α β} (m : β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : α → Filter β) :
map m (bind f g) = bind f (map m ∘ g) :=
rfl
theorem bind_map {α β} (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) (g : β → Filter γ) :
(bind (map m f) g) = bind f (g ∘ m) :=
rfl
/-!
### `Filter` as a `Monad`
In this section we define `Filter.monad`, a `Monad` structure on `Filter`s. This definition is not
an instance because its `Seq` projection is not equal to the `Filter.seq` function we use in the
`Applicative` instance on `Filter`.
-/
section
/-- The monad structure on filters. -/
protected def monad : Monad Filter where map := @Filter.map
#align filter.monad Filter.monad
attribute [local instance] Filter.monad
protected theorem lawfulMonad : LawfulMonad Filter where
map_const := rfl
id_map _ := rfl
seqLeft_eq _ _ := rfl
seqRight_eq _ _ := rfl
pure_seq _ _ := rfl
bind_pure_comp _ _ := rfl
bind_map _ _ := rfl
pure_bind _ _ := rfl
bind_assoc _ _ _ := rfl
#align filter.is_lawful_monad Filter.lawfulMonad
end
instance : Alternative Filter where
seq := fun x y => x.seq (y ())
failure := ⊥
orElse x y := x ⊔ y ()
@[simp]
theorem map_def {α β} (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : m <$> f = map m f :=
rfl
#align filter.map_def Filter.map_def
@[simp]
theorem bind_def {α β} (f : Filter α) (m : α → Filter β) : f >>= m = bind f m :=
rfl
#align filter.bind_def Filter.bind_def
/-! #### `map` and `comap` equations -/
section Map
variable {f f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g g₁ g₂ : Filter β} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
@[simp] theorem mem_comap : s ∈ comap m g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_comap Filter.mem_comap
theorem preimage_mem_comap (ht : t ∈ g) : m ⁻¹' t ∈ comap m g :=
⟨t, ht, Subset.rfl⟩
#align filter.preimage_mem_comap Filter.preimage_mem_comap
theorem Eventually.comap {p : β → Prop} (hf : ∀ᶠ b in g, p b) (f : α → β) :
∀ᶠ a in comap f g, p (f a) :=
preimage_mem_comap hf
#align filter.eventually.comap Filter.Eventually.comap
theorem comap_id : comap id f = f :=
le_antisymm (fun _ => preimage_mem_comap) fun _ ⟨_, ht, hst⟩ => mem_of_superset ht hst
#align filter.comap_id Filter.comap_id
theorem comap_id' : comap (fun x => x) f = f := comap_id
#align filter.comap_id' Filter.comap_id'
theorem comap_const_of_not_mem {x : β} (ht : t ∈ g) (hx : x ∉ t) : comap (fun _ : α => x) g = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| mem_comap'.2 <| mem_of_superset ht fun _ hx' _ h => hx <| h.symm ▸ hx'
#align filter.comap_const_of_not_mem Filter.comap_const_of_not_mem
theorem comap_const_of_mem {x : β} (h : ∀ t ∈ g, x ∈ t) : comap (fun _ : α => x) g = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun _ hs => univ_mem' fun _ => h _ (mem_comap'.1 hs) rfl
#align filter.comap_const_of_mem Filter.comap_const_of_mem
theorem map_const [NeBot f] {c : β} : (f.map fun _ => c) = pure c := by
ext s
by_cases h : c ∈ s <;> simp [h]
#align filter.map_const Filter.map_const
theorem comap_comap {m : γ → β} {n : β → α} : comap m (comap n f) = comap (n ∘ m) f :=
Filter.coext fun s => by simp only [compl_mem_comap, image_image, (· ∘ ·)]
#align filter.comap_comap Filter.comap_comap
section comm
/-!
The variables in the following lemmas are used as in this diagram:
```
φ
α → β
θ ↓ ↓ ψ
γ → δ
ρ
```
-/
variable {φ : α → β} {θ : α → γ} {ψ : β → δ} {ρ : γ → δ} (H : ψ ∘ φ = ρ ∘ θ)
theorem map_comm (F : Filter α) : map ψ (map φ F) = map ρ (map θ F) := by
rw [Filter.map_map, H, ← Filter.map_map]
#align filter.map_comm Filter.map_comm
theorem comap_comm (G : Filter δ) : comap φ (comap ψ G) = comap θ (comap ρ G) := by
rw [Filter.comap_comap, H, ← Filter.comap_comap]
#align filter.comap_comm Filter.comap_comm
end comm
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.filter_map {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) :=
map_comm h.comp_eq
#align function.semiconj.filter_map Function.Semiconj.filter_map
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.filter_map {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (map f) (map g) :=
h.semiconj.filter_map
#align function.commute.filter_map Function.Commute.filter_map
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.filter_comap {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (comap f) (comap gb) (comap ga) :=
comap_comm h.comp_eq.symm
#align function.semiconj.filter_comap Function.Semiconj.filter_comap
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.filter_comap {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (comap f) (comap g) :=
h.semiconj.filter_comap
#align function.commute.filter_comap Function.Commute.filter_comap
section
open Filter
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.filter_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInverse g f) :
LeftInverse (map g) (map f) := fun F ↦ by
rw [map_map, hfg.comp_eq_id, map_id]
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.filter_comap {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInverse g f) :
RightInverse (comap g) (comap f) := fun F ↦ by
rw [comap_comap, hfg.comp_eq_id, comap_id]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.filter_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInverse g f) : RightInverse (map g) (map f) :=
hfg.filter_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.filter_comap {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInverse g f) : LeftInverse (comap g) (comap f) :=
hfg.filter_comap
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.filter_map_Iic {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInvOn g f s) :
LeftInvOn (map g) (map f) (Iic <| 𝓟 s) := fun F (hF : F ≤ 𝓟 s) ↦ by
have : (g ∘ f) =ᶠ[𝓟 s] id := by simpa only [eventuallyEq_principal] using hfg
rw [map_map, map_congr (this.filter_mono hF), map_id]
nonrec theorem _root_.Set.RightInvOn.filter_map_Iic {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInvOn g f t) : RightInvOn (map g) (map f) (Iic <| 𝓟 t) :=
hfg.filter_map_Iic
end
@[simp]
theorem comap_principal {t : Set β} : comap m (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' t) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨_u, hu, b⟩ => (preimage_mono hu).trans b,
fun h => ⟨t, Subset.rfl, h⟩⟩
#align filter.comap_principal Filter.comap_principal
theorem principal_subtype {α : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set s) :
𝓟 t = comap (↑) (𝓟 (((↑) : s → α) '' t)) := by
rw [comap_principal, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.coe_injective]
#align principal_subtype Filter.principal_subtype
@[simp]
theorem comap_pure {b : β} : comap m (pure b) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [← principal_singleton, comap_principal]
#align filter.comap_pure Filter.comap_pure
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map m f ≤ g ↔ f ≤ comap m g :=
⟨fun h _ ⟨_, ht, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset (h ht) hts, fun h _ ht => h ⟨_, ht, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.map_le_iff_le_comap Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (m : α → β) : GaloisConnection (map m) (comap m) :=
fun _ _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
#align filter.gc_map_comap Filter.gc_map_comap
theorem comap_le_iff_le_kernMap : comap m g ≤ f ↔ g ≤ kernMap m f := by
simp [Filter.le_def, mem_comap'', mem_kernMap, -mem_comap]
theorem gc_comap_kernMap (m : α → β) : GaloisConnection (comap m) (kernMap m) :=
fun _ _ ↦ comap_le_iff_le_kernMap
theorem kernMap_principal {s : Set α} : kernMap m (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (kernImage m s) := by
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (fun g ↦ ?_)
rw [← comap_le_iff_le_kernMap, le_principal_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_comap'']
@[mono]
theorem map_mono : Monotone (map m) :=
(gc_map_comap m).monotone_l
#align filter.map_mono Filter.map_mono
@[mono]
theorem comap_mono : Monotone (comap m) :=
(gc_map_comap m).monotone_u
#align filter.comap_mono Filter.comap_mono
/-- Temporary lemma that we can tag with `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr, deprecated] theorem map_le_map (h : F ≤ G) : map m F ≤ map m G := map_mono h
/-- Temporary lemma that we can tag with `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr, deprecated] theorem comap_le_comap (h : F ≤ G) : comap m F ≤ comap m G := comap_mono h
@[simp] theorem map_bot : map m ⊥ = ⊥ := (gc_map_comap m).l_bot
#align filter.map_bot Filter.map_bot
@[simp] theorem map_sup : map m (f₁ ⊔ f₂) = map m f₁ ⊔ map m f₂ := (gc_map_comap m).l_sup
#align filter.map_sup Filter.map_sup
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {f : ι → Filter α} : map m (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, map m (f i) :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_iSup
#align filter.map_supr Filter.map_iSup
@[simp]
theorem map_top (f : α → β) : map f ⊤ = 𝓟 (range f) := by
rw [← principal_univ, map_principal, image_univ]
#align filter.map_top Filter.map_top
@[simp] theorem comap_top : comap m ⊤ = ⊤ := (gc_map_comap m).u_top
#align filter.comap_top Filter.comap_top
@[simp] theorem comap_inf : comap m (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊓ comap m g₂ := (gc_map_comap m).u_inf
#align filter.comap_inf Filter.comap_inf
@[simp]
theorem comap_iInf {f : ι → Filter β} : comap m (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, comap m (f i) :=
(gc_map_comap m).u_iInf
#align filter.comap_infi Filter.comap_iInf
theorem le_comap_top (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) : l ≤ comap f ⊤ := by
rw [comap_top]
exact le_top
#align filter.le_comap_top Filter.le_comap_top
theorem map_comap_le : map m (comap m g) ≤ g :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_u_le _
#align filter.map_comap_le Filter.map_comap_le
theorem le_comap_map : f ≤ comap m (map m f) :=
(gc_map_comap m).le_u_l _
#align filter.le_comap_map Filter.le_comap_map
@[simp]
theorem comap_bot : comap m ⊥ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp only [empty_subset, preimage_empty]⟩
#align filter.comap_bot Filter.comap_bot
theorem neBot_of_comap (h : (comap m g).NeBot) : g.NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff] at *
contrapose! h
rw [h]
exact comap_bot
#align filter.ne_bot_of_comap Filter.neBot_of_comap
theorem comap_inf_principal_range : comap m (g ⊓ 𝓟 (range m)) = comap m g := by
simp
#align filter.comap_inf_principal_range Filter.comap_inf_principal_range
theorem disjoint_comap (h : Disjoint g₁ g₂) : Disjoint (comap m g₁) (comap m g₂) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← comap_inf, h.eq_bot, comap_bot]
#align filter.disjoint_comap Filter.disjoint_comap
theorem comap_iSup {ι} {f : ι → Filter β} {m : α → β} : comap m (iSup f) = ⨆ i, comap m (f i) :=
(gc_comap_kernMap m).l_iSup
#align filter.comap_supr Filter.comap_iSup
theorem comap_sSup {s : Set (Filter β)} {m : α → β} : comap m (sSup s) = ⨆ f ∈ s, comap m f := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, comap_iSup, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.comap_Sup Filter.comap_sSup
theorem comap_sup : comap m (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊔ comap m g₂ := by
rw [sup_eq_iSup, comap_iSup, iSup_bool_eq, Bool.cond_true, Bool.cond_false]
#align filter.comap_sup Filter.comap_sup
theorem map_comap (f : Filter β) (m : α → β) : (f.comap m).map m = f ⊓ 𝓟 (range m) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_inf map_comap_le <| le_principal_iff.2 range_mem_map) ?_
rintro t' ⟨t, ht, sub⟩
refine mem_inf_principal.2 (mem_of_superset ht ?_)
rintro _ hxt ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact sub hxt
#align filter.map_comap Filter.map_comap
theorem map_comap_setCoe_val (f : Filter β) (s : Set β) :
(f.comap ((↑) : s → β)).map (↑) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
rw [map_comap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_comap_of_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) : (f.comap m).map m = f := by
rw [map_comap, inf_eq_left.2 (le_principal_iff.2 hf)]
#align filter.map_comap_of_mem Filter.map_comap_of_mem
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Filter α) (Filter β) (map c) fun f => ∀ᶠ x : α in f, p x where
prf f hf := ⟨comap c f, map_comap_of_mem <| hf.mono CanLift.prf⟩
#align filter.can_lift Filter.canLift
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f g : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) :
comap m f ≤ comap m g ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨fun h => map_comap_of_mem hf ▸ (map_mono h).trans map_comap_le, fun h => comap_mono h⟩
#align filter.comap_le_comap_iff Filter.comap_le_comap_iff
theorem map_comap_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (l : Filter β) :
map f (comap f l) = l :=
map_comap_of_mem <| by simp only [hf.range_eq, univ_mem]
#align filter.map_comap_of_surjective Filter.map_comap_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (comap f) :=
LeftInverse.injective <| map_comap_of_surjective hf
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.filter_map_top {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(congr_arg _ comap_top).symm.trans <| map_comap_of_surjective hf ⊤
#align function.surjective.filter_map_top Function.Surjective.filter_map_top
theorem subtype_coe_map_comap (s : Set α) (f : Filter α) :
map ((↑) : s → α) (comap ((↑) : s → α) f) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s := by rw [map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
#align filter.subtype_coe_map_comap Filter.subtype_coe_map_comap
theorem image_mem_of_mem_comap {f : Filter α} {c : β → α} (h : range c ∈ f) {W : Set β}
(W_in : W ∈ comap c f) : c '' W ∈ f := by
rw [← map_comap_of_mem h]
exact image_mem_map W_in
#align filter.image_mem_of_mem_comap Filter.image_mem_of_mem_comap
theorem image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap {f : Filter α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ f) {W : Set U}
(W_in : W ∈ comap ((↑) : U → α) f) : (↑) '' W ∈ f :=
image_mem_of_mem_comap (by simp [h]) W_in
#align filter.image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap Filter.image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap
theorem comap_map {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (h : Injective m) : comap m (map m f) = f :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
mem_of_superset (preimage_mem_comap <| image_mem_map hs) <| by
simp only [preimage_image_eq s h, Subset.rfl])
le_comap_map
#align filter.comap_map Filter.comap_map
theorem mem_comap_iff {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (inj : Injective m) (large : Set.range m ∈ f)
{S : Set α} : S ∈ comap m f ↔ m '' S ∈ f := by
rw [← image_mem_map_iff inj, map_comap_of_mem large]
#align filter.mem_comap_iff Filter.mem_comap_iff
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injOn {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : s ∈ l₁)
(h₂ : s ∈ l₂) (hinj : InjOn f s) : map f l₁ ≤ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂ :=
⟨fun h _t ht =>
mp_mem h₁ <|
mem_of_superset (h <| image_mem_map (inter_mem h₂ ht)) fun _y ⟨_x, ⟨hxs, hxt⟩, hxy⟩ hys =>
hinj hxs hys hxy ▸ hxt,
fun h => map_mono h⟩
#align filter.map_le_map_iff_of_inj_on Filter.map_le_map_iff_of_injOn
theorem map_le_map_iff {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) :
map m f ≤ map m g ↔ f ≤ g := by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map hm]
#align filter.map_le_map_iff Filter.map_le_map_iff
theorem map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} {s : Set α} (hsf : s ∈ f) (hsg : s ∈ g)
(hm : InjOn m s) : map m f = map m g ↔ f = g := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, map_le_map_iff_of_injOn hsf hsg hm,
map_le_map_iff_of_injOn hsg hsf hm]
#align filter.map_eq_map_iff_of_inj_on Filter.map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn
theorem map_inj {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) : map m f = map m g ↔ f = g :=
map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn univ_mem univ_mem hm.injOn
#align filter.map_inj Filter.map_inj
theorem map_injective {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) : Injective (map m) := fun _ _ =>
(map_inj hm).1
#align filter.map_injective Filter.map_injective
theorem comap_neBot_iff {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} : NeBot (comap m f) ↔ ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t := by
simp only [← forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot, mem_comap, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
exact ⟨fun h t t_in => h (m ⁻¹' t) t t_in Subset.rfl, fun h s t ht hst => (h t ht).imp hst⟩
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_neBot_iff
theorem comap_neBot {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t) : NeBot (comap m f) :=
comap_neBot_iff.mpr hm
#align filter.comap_ne_bot Filter.comap_neBot
theorem comap_neBot_iff_frequently {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} :
NeBot (comap m f) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in f, y ∈ range m := by
simp only [comap_neBot_iff, frequently_iff, mem_range, @and_comm (_ ∈ _), exists_exists_eq_and]
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently Filter.comap_neBot_iff_frequently
theorem comap_neBot_iff_compl_range {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} :
NeBot (comap m f) ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∉ f :=
comap_neBot_iff_frequently
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff_compl_range Filter.comap_neBot_iff_compl_range
theorem comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} : comap m f = ⊥ ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∈ f :=
not_iff_not.mp <| neBot_iff.symm.trans comap_neBot_iff_compl_range
#align filter.comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range Filter.comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range
theorem comap_surjective_eq_bot {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : Surjective m) :
comap m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ := by
rw [comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range, hm.range_eq, compl_univ, empty_mem_iff_bot]
#align filter.comap_surjective_eq_bot Filter.comap_surjective_eq_bot
theorem disjoint_comap_iff (h : Surjective m) :
Disjoint (comap m g₁) (comap m g₂) ↔ Disjoint g₁ g₂ := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← comap_inf, comap_surjective_eq_bot h]
#align filter.disjoint_comap_iff Filter.disjoint_comap_iff
theorem NeBot.comap_of_range_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (_ : NeBot f) (hm : range m ∈ f) :
NeBot (comap m f) :=
comap_neBot_iff_frequently.2 <| Eventually.frequently hm
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_range_mem Filter.NeBot.comap_of_range_mem
@[simp]
theorem comap_fst_neBot_iff {f : Filter α} :
(f.comap (Prod.fst : α × β → α)).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ Nonempty β := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; simp [*]
· simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, *]
#align filter.comap_fst_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_fst_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_fst_neBot [Nonempty β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] :
(f.comap (Prod.fst : α × β → α)).NeBot :=
comap_fst_neBot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
#align filter.comap_fst_ne_bot Filter.comap_fst_neBot
@[simp]
theorem comap_snd_neBot_iff {f : Filter β} :
(f.comap (Prod.snd : α × β → β)).NeBot ↔ Nonempty α ∧ f.NeBot := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; simp
· simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, hα]
#align filter.comap_snd_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_snd_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_snd_neBot [Nonempty α] {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] :
(f.comap (Prod.snd : α × β → β)).NeBot :=
comap_snd_neBot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
#align filter.comap_snd_ne_bot Filter.comap_snd_neBot
theorem comap_eval_neBot_iff' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {i : ι} {f : Filter (α i)} :
(comap (eval i) f).NeBot ↔ (∀ j, Nonempty (α j)) ∧ NeBot f := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty (∀ j, α j) with H H
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]
simp [← Classical.nonempty_pi]
· have : ∀ j, Nonempty (α j) := Classical.nonempty_pi.1 H
simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, *]
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot_iff' Filter.comap_eval_neBot_iff'
@[simp]
theorem comap_eval_neBot_iff {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, Nonempty (α j)] {i : ι}
{f : Filter (α i)} : (comap (eval i) f).NeBot ↔ NeBot f := by simp [comap_eval_neBot_iff', *]
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_eval_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_eval_neBot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, Nonempty (α j)] (i : ι)
(f : Filter (α i)) [NeBot f] : (comap (eval i) f).NeBot :=
comap_eval_neBot_iff.2 ‹_›
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot Filter.comap_eval_neBot
theorem comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α}
(hs : m '' s ∈ f) : NeBot (comap m f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := by
refine ⟨compl_compl s ▸ mt mem_of_eq_bot ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
rcases hf.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hs ht) with ⟨_, ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩, hxt⟩
exact absurd hxs (hts hxt)
#align filter.comap_inf_principal_ne_bot_of_image_mem Filter.comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem
theorem comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal {s : Set γ} {l : Filter γ} [h : NeBot l] (h' : l ≤ 𝓟 s) :
NeBot (comap ((↑) : s → γ) l) :=
h.comap_of_range_mem <| (@Subtype.range_coe γ s).symm ▸ h' (mem_principal_self s)
#align filter.comap_coe_ne_bot_of_le_principal Filter.comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal
theorem NeBot.comap_of_surj {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) (hm : Surjective m) :
NeBot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem <| univ_mem' hm
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_surj Filter.NeBot.comap_of_surj
theorem NeBot.comap_of_image_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α}
(hs : m '' s ∈ f) : NeBot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem <| mem_of_superset hs (image_subset_range _ _)
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_image_mem Filter.NeBot.comap_of_image_mem
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff : map m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot]
exact id, fun h => by simp only [h, map_bot]⟩
#align filter.map_eq_bot_iff Filter.map_eq_bot_iff
theorem map_neBot_iff (f : α → β) {F : Filter α} : NeBot (map f F) ↔ NeBot F := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.map_ne_bot_iff Filter.map_neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.map (hf : NeBot f) (m : α → β) : NeBot (map m f) :=
(map_neBot_iff m).2 hf
#align filter.ne_bot.map Filter.NeBot.map
theorem NeBot.of_map : NeBot (f.map m) → NeBot f :=
(map_neBot_iff m).1
#align filter.ne_bot.of_map Filter.NeBot.of_map
instance map_neBot [hf : NeBot f] : NeBot (f.map m) :=
hf.map m
#align filter.map_ne_bot Filter.map_neBot
theorem sInter_comap_sets (f : α → β) (F : Filter β) : ⋂₀ (comap f F).sets = ⋂ U ∈ F, f ⁻¹' U := by
ext x
suffices (∀ (A : Set α) (B : Set β), B ∈ F → f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A → x ∈ A) ↔
∀ B : Set β, B ∈ F → f x ∈ B by
simp only [mem_sInter, mem_iInter, Filter.mem_sets, mem_comap, this, and_imp, exists_prop,
mem_preimage, exists_imp]
constructor
· intro h U U_in
simpa only [Subset.rfl, forall_prop_of_true, mem_preimage] using h (f ⁻¹' U) U U_in
· intro h V U U_in f_U_V
exact f_U_V (h U U_in)
#align filter.sInter_comap_sets Filter.sInter_comap_sets
end Map
-- this is a generic rule for monotone functions:
theorem map_iInf_le {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (iInf f) ≤ ⨅ i, map m (f i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => map_mono <| iInf_le _ _
#align filter.map_infi_le Filter.map_iInf_le
theorem map_iInf_eq {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] :
map m (iInf f) = ⨅ i, map m (f i) :=
map_iInf_le.antisymm fun s (hs : m ⁻¹' s ∈ iInf f) =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := (mem_iInf_of_directed hf _).1 hs
have : ⨅ i, map m (f i) ≤ 𝓟 s :=
iInf_le_of_le i <| by simpa only [le_principal_iff, mem_map]
Filter.le_principal_iff.1 this
#align filter.map_infi_eq Filter.map_iInf_eq
theorem map_biInf_eq {ι : Type w} {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} {p : ι → Prop}
(h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) { x | p x }) (ne : ∃ i, p i) :
map m (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), map m (f i) := by
haveI := nonempty_subtype.2 ne
simp only [iInf_subtype']
exact map_iInf_eq h.directed_val
#align filter.map_binfi_eq Filter.map_biInf_eq
theorem map_inf_le {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (f ⊓ g) ≤ map m f ⊓ map m g :=
(@map_mono _ _ m).map_inf_le f g
#align filter.map_inf_le Filter.map_inf_le
theorem map_inf {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (h : Injective m) :
map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g := by
refine map_inf_le.antisymm ?_
rintro t ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, ht : m ⁻¹' t = s₁ ∩ s₂⟩
refine mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂) ?_
rw [← image_inter h, image_subset_iff, ht]
#align filter.map_inf Filter.map_inf
theorem map_inf' {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} {t : Set α} (htf : t ∈ f) (htg : t ∈ g)
(h : InjOn m t) : map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g := by
lift f to Filter t using htf; lift g to Filter t using htg
replace h : Injective (m ∘ ((↑) : t → α)) := h.injective
simp only [map_map, ← map_inf Subtype.coe_injective, map_inf h]
#align filter.map_inf' Filter.map_inf'
lemma disjoint_of_map {α β : Type*} {F G : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : Disjoint (map f F) (map f G)) : Disjoint F G :=
disjoint_iff.mpr <| map_eq_bot_iff.mp <| le_bot_iff.mp <| trans map_inf_le (disjoint_iff.mp h)
theorem disjoint_map {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} :
Disjoint (map m f₁) (map m f₂) ↔ Disjoint f₁ f₂ := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← map_inf hm, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.disjoint_map Filter.disjoint_map
theorem map_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : Filter β) : map e.symm f = comap e f :=
map_injective e.injective <| by
rw [map_map, e.self_comp_symm, map_id, map_comap_of_surjective e.surjective]
#align filter.map_equiv_symm Filter.map_equiv_symm
theorem map_eq_comap_of_inverse {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {n : β → α} (h₁ : m ∘ n = id)
(h₂ : n ∘ m = id) : map m f = comap n f :=
map_equiv_symm ⟨n, m, congr_fun h₁, congr_fun h₂⟩ f
#align filter.map_eq_comap_of_inverse Filter.map_eq_comap_of_inverse
theorem comap_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : Filter α) : comap e.symm f = map e f :=
(map_eq_comap_of_inverse e.self_comp_symm e.symm_comp_self).symm
#align filter.comap_equiv_symm Filter.comap_equiv_symm
theorem map_swap_eq_comap_swap {f : Filter (α × β)} : Prod.swap <$> f = comap Prod.swap f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse Prod.swap_swap_eq Prod.swap_swap_eq
#align filter.map_swap_eq_comap_swap Filter.map_swap_eq_comap_swap
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_eq_comap {f : Filter ((α × β) × γ × δ)} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) f =
comap (fun p : (α × γ) × β × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse (funext fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl) (funext fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl)
#align filter.map_swap4_eq_comap Filter.map_swap4_eq_comap
theorem le_map {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {g : Filter β} (h : ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g) : g ≤ f.map m :=
fun _ hs => mem_of_superset (h _ hs) <| image_preimage_subset _ _
#align filter.le_map Filter.le_map
theorem le_map_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {g : Filter β} : g ≤ f.map m ↔ ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g :=
⟨fun h _ hs => h (image_mem_map hs), le_map⟩
#align filter.le_map_iff Filter.le_map_iff
protected theorem push_pull (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) = map f F ⊓ G := by
apply le_antisymm
· calc
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) ≤ map f F ⊓ (map f <| comap f G) := map_inf_le
_ ≤ map f F ⊓ G := inf_le_inf_left (map f F) map_comap_le
· rintro U ⟨V, V_in, W, ⟨Z, Z_in, hZ⟩, h⟩
apply mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map V_in) Z_in
calc
f '' V ∩ Z = f '' (V ∩ f ⁻¹' Z) := by rw [image_inter_preimage]
_ ⊆ f '' (V ∩ W) := image_subset _ (inter_subset_inter_right _ ‹_›)
_ = f '' (f ⁻¹' U) := by rw [h]
_ ⊆ U := image_preimage_subset f U
#align filter.push_pull Filter.push_pull
protected theorem push_pull' (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
map f (comap f G ⊓ F) = G ⊓ map f F := by simp only [Filter.push_pull, inf_comm]
#align filter.push_pull' Filter.push_pull'
theorem principal_eq_map_coe_top (s : Set α) : 𝓟 s = map ((↑) : s → α) ⊤ := by simp
#align filter.principal_eq_map_coe_top Filter.principal_eq_map_coe_top
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
F ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ comap ((↑) : s → α) F = ⊥ := by
rw [principal_eq_map_coe_top s, ← Filter.push_pull', inf_top_eq, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap
section Applicative
theorem singleton_mem_pure {a : α} : {a} ∈ (pure a : Filter α) :=
mem_singleton a
#align filter.singleton_mem_pure Filter.singleton_mem_pure
theorem pure_injective : Injective (pure : α → Filter α) := fun a _ hab =>
(Filter.ext_iff.1 hab { x | a = x }).1 rfl
#align filter.pure_injective Filter.pure_injective
instance pure_neBot {α : Type u} {a : α} : NeBot (pure a) :=
⟨mt empty_mem_iff_bot.2 <| not_mem_empty a⟩
#align filter.pure_ne_bot Filter.pure_neBot
@[simp]
theorem le_pure_iff {f : Filter α} {a : α} : f ≤ pure a ↔ {a} ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_singleton, le_principal_iff]
#align filter.le_pure_iff Filter.le_pure_iff
theorem mem_seq_def {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, (x : α → β) y ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_seq_def Filter.mem_seq_def
theorem mem_seq_iff {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Set.seq u t ⊆ s := by
simp only [mem_seq_def, seq_subset, exists_prop, iff_self_iff]
#align filter.mem_seq_iff Filter.mem_seq_iff
theorem mem_map_seq_iff {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {m : α → β → γ} {s : Set γ} :
s ∈ (f.map m).seq g ↔ ∃ t u, t ∈ g ∧ u ∈ f ∧ ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, m x y ∈ s :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hts⟩ => ⟨s, m ⁻¹' t, hs, ht, fun _ => hts _⟩)
fun ⟨t, s, ht, hs, hts⟩ =>
⟨m '' s, image_mem_map hs, t, ht, fun _ ⟨_, has, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ hts _ has⟩
#align filter.mem_map_seq_iff Filter.mem_map_seq_iff
theorem seq_mem_seq {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : s.seq t ∈ f.seq g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun f hf a ha => ⟨f, hf, a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.seq_mem_seq Filter.seq_mem_seq
theorem le_seq {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {h : Filter β}
(hh : ∀ t ∈ f, ∀ u ∈ g, Set.seq t u ∈ h) : h ≤ seq f g := fun _ ⟨_, ht, _, hu, hs⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hh _ ht _ hu) fun _ ⟨_, hm, _, ha, eq⟩ => eq ▸ hs _ hm _ ha
#align filter.le_seq Filter.le_seq
@[mono]
theorem seq_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (α → β)} {g₁ g₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.seq g₁ ≤ f₂.seq g₂ :=
le_seq fun _ hs _ ht => seq_mem_seq (hf hs) (hg ht)
#align filter.seq_mono Filter.seq_mono
@[simp]
theorem pure_seq_eq_map (g : α → β) (f : Filter α) : seq (pure g) f = f.map g := by
refine le_antisymm (le_map fun s hs => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rw [← singleton_seq]
apply seq_mem_seq _ hs
exact singleton_mem_pure
· refine sets_of_superset (map g f) (image_mem_map ht) ?_
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩
#align filter.pure_seq_eq_map Filter.pure_seq_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem seq_pure (f : Filter (α → β)) (a : α) : seq f (pure a) = map (fun g : α → β => g a) f := by
refine le_antisymm (le_map fun s hs => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rw [← seq_singleton]
exact seq_mem_seq hs singleton_mem_pure
· refine sets_of_superset (map (fun g : α → β => g a) f) (image_mem_map hs) ?_
rintro b ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hg, a, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.seq_pure Filter.seq_pure
@[simp]
theorem seq_assoc (x : Filter α) (g : Filter (α → β)) (h : Filter (β → γ)) :
seq h (seq g x) = seq (seq (map (· ∘ ·) h) g) x := by
refine le_antisymm (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rcases mem_seq_iff.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, hs⟩
rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hu with ⟨w, hw, hu⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono ((Set.seq_mono hu Subset.rfl).trans hs) Subset.rfl)
rw [← Set.seq_seq]
exact seq_mem_seq hw (seq_mem_seq hv ht)
· rcases mem_seq_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, ht⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono Subset.rfl ht)
rw [Set.seq_seq]
exact seq_mem_seq (seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map hs) hu) hv
#align filter.seq_assoc Filter.seq_assoc
theorem prod_map_seq_comm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
(map Prod.mk f).seq g = seq (map (fun b a => (a, b)) g) f := by
refine le_antisymm (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono hs Subset.rfl)
rw [← Set.prod_image_seq_comm]
exact seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map ht) hu
· rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono hs Subset.rfl)
rw [Set.prod_image_seq_comm]
exact seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map ht) hu
#align filter.prod_map_seq_comm Filter.prod_map_seq_comm
theorem seq_eq_filter_seq {α β : Type u} (f : Filter (α → β)) (g : Filter α) :
f <*> g = seq f g :=
rfl
#align filter.seq_eq_filter_seq Filter.seq_eq_filter_seq
instance : LawfulApplicative (Filter : Type u → Type u) where
map_pure := map_pure
seqLeft_eq _ _ := rfl
seqRight_eq _ _ := rfl
seq_pure := seq_pure
pure_seq := pure_seq_eq_map
seq_assoc := seq_assoc
instance : CommApplicative (Filter : Type u → Type u) :=
⟨fun f g => prod_map_seq_comm f g⟩
end Applicative
/-! #### `bind` equations -/
section Bind
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bind {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in bind f m, p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ᶠ y in m x, p y :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_bind Filter.eventually_bind
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_bind {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ =ᶠ[bind f m] g₂ ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, g₁ =ᶠ[m x] g₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq_bind Filter.eventuallyEq_bind
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyLE_bind [LE γ] {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ ≤ᶠ[bind f m] g₂ ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, g₁ ≤ᶠ[m x] g₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_le_bind Filter.eventuallyLE_bind
theorem mem_bind' {s : Set β} {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} :
s ∈ bind f m ↔ { a | s ∈ m a } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_bind' Filter.mem_bind'
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {s : Set β} {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} :
s ∈ bind f m ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, s ∈ m x :=
calc
s ∈ bind f m ↔ { a | s ∈ m a } ∈ f := Iff.rfl
_ ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ { a | s ∈ m a } := exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
_ ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, s ∈ m x := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_bind Filter.mem_bind
theorem bind_le {f : Filter α} {g : α → Filter β} {l : Filter β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, g x ≤ l) :
f.bind g ≤ l :=
join_le <| eventually_map.2 h
#align filter.bind_le Filter.bind_le
@[mono]
theorem bind_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : α → Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[f₁] g₂) :
bind f₁ g₁ ≤ bind f₂ g₂ := by
refine le_trans (fun s hs => ?_) (join_mono <| map_mono hf)
simp only [mem_join, mem_bind', mem_map] at hs ⊢
filter_upwards [hg, hs] with _ hx hs using hx hs
#align filter.bind_mono Filter.bind_mono
theorem bind_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {g : α → Filter β} {s : Set β} :
(f.bind fun x => g x ⊓ 𝓟 s) = f.bind g ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
Filter.ext fun s => by simp only [mem_bind, mem_inf_principal]
#align filter.bind_inf_principal Filter.bind_inf_principal
theorem sup_bind {f g : Filter α} {h : α → Filter β} : bind (f ⊔ g) h = bind f h ⊔ bind g h := rfl
#align filter.sup_bind Filter.sup_bind
theorem principal_bind {s : Set α} {f : α → Filter β} : bind (𝓟 s) f = ⨆ x ∈ s, f x :=
show join (map f (𝓟 s)) = ⨆ x ∈ s, f x by
simp only [sSup_image, join_principal_eq_sSup, map_principal, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.principal_bind Filter.principal_bind
end Bind
/-! ### Limits -/
/-- `Filter.Tendsto` is the generic "limit of a function" predicate.
`Tendsto f l₁ l₂` asserts that for every `l₂` neighborhood `a`,
the `f`-preimage of `a` is an `l₁` neighborhood. -/
def Tendsto (f : α → β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :=
l₁.map f ≤ l₂
#align filter.tendsto Filter.Tendsto
theorem tendsto_def {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, f ⁻¹' s ∈ l₁ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_def Filter.tendsto_def
theorem tendsto_iff_eventually {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃p : β → Prop⦄, (∀ᶠ y in l₂, p y) → ∀ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_iff_eventually Filter.tendsto_iff_eventually
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, ∀ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem Filter.tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem
lemma Tendsto.eventually_mem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {s : Set β}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : s ∈ l₂) : ∀ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∈ s :=
hf h
theorem Tendsto.eventually {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : β → Prop}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : ∀ᶠ y in l₂, p y) : ∀ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x) :=
hf h
#align filter.tendsto.eventually Filter.Tendsto.eventually
theorem not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
¬Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∃ s ∈ l₂, ∃ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∉ s := by
simp only [tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem, not_forall, exists_prop, not_eventually]
#align filter.not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem Filter.not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem
theorem Tendsto.frequently {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : β → Prop}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : ∃ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x)) : ∃ᶠ y in l₂, p y :=
mt hf.eventually h
#align filter.tendsto.frequently Filter.Tendsto.frequently
theorem Tendsto.frequently_map {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(f : α → β) (c : Filter.Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (w : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) (h : ∃ᶠ x in l₁, p x) :
∃ᶠ y in l₂, q y :=
c.frequently (h.mono w)
#align filter.tendsto.frequently_map Filter.Tendsto.frequently_map
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_bot {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} : Tendsto f ⊥ l := by simp [Tendsto]
#align filter.tendsto_bot Filter.tendsto_bot
@[simp] theorem tendsto_top {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} : Tendsto f l ⊤ := le_top
#align filter.tendsto_top Filter.tendsto_top
theorem le_map_of_right_inverse {mab : α → β} {mba : β → α} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
(h₁ : mab ∘ mba =ᶠ[g] id) (h₂ : Tendsto mba g f) : g ≤ map mab f := by
rw [← @map_id _ g, ← map_congr h₁, ← map_map]
exact map_mono h₂
#align filter.le_map_of_right_inverse Filter.le_map_of_right_inverse
theorem tendsto_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {f : α → β} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} :
Tendsto f la lb := by simp only [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty la, tendsto_bot]
#align filter.tendsto_of_is_empty Filter.tendsto_of_isEmpty
theorem eventuallyEq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} {fa : Filter α}
{fb : Filter β} (hleft : ∀ᶠ x in fa, g₁ (f x) = x) (hright : ∀ᶠ y in fb, f (g₂ y) = y)
(htendsto : Tendsto g₂ fb fa) : g₁ =ᶠ[fb] g₂ :=
(htendsto.eventually hleft).mp <| hright.mono fun _ hr hl => (congr_arg g₁ hr.symm).trans hl
#align filter.eventually_eq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv Filter.eventuallyEq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv
theorem tendsto_iff_comap {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂.comap f :=
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align filter.tendsto_iff_comap Filter.tendsto_iff_comap
alias ⟨Tendsto.le_comap, _⟩ := tendsto_iff_comap
#align filter.tendsto.le_comap Filter.Tendsto.le_comap
protected theorem Tendsto.disjoint {f : α → β} {la₁ la₂ : Filter α} {lb₁ lb₂ : Filter β}
(h₁ : Tendsto f la₁ lb₁) (hd : Disjoint lb₁ lb₂) (h₂ : Tendsto f la₂ lb₂) : Disjoint la₁ la₂ :=
(disjoint_comap hd).mono h₁.le_comap h₂.le_comap
#align filter.tendsto.disjoint Filter.Tendsto.disjoint
theorem tendsto_congr' {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (hl : f₁ =ᶠ[l₁] f₂) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ ↔ Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ := by rw [Tendsto, Tendsto, map_congr hl]
#align filter.tendsto_congr' Filter.tendsto_congr'
theorem Tendsto.congr' {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (hl : f₁ =ᶠ[l₁] f₂)
(h : Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂) : Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_congr' hl).1 h
#align filter.tendsto.congr' Filter.Tendsto.congr'
theorem tendsto_congr {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ ↔ Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
tendsto_congr' (univ_mem' h)
#align filter.tendsto_congr Filter.tendsto_congr
theorem Tendsto.congr {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ → Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_congr h).1
#align filter.tendsto.congr Filter.Tendsto.congr
theorem tendsto_id' {x y : Filter α} : Tendsto id x y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_id' Filter.tendsto_id'
theorem tendsto_id {x : Filter α} : Tendsto id x x :=
le_refl x
#align filter.tendsto_id Filter.tendsto_id
theorem Tendsto.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} {z : Filter γ}
(hg : Tendsto g y z) (hf : Tendsto f x y) : Tendsto (g ∘ f) x z := fun _ hs => hf (hg hs)
#align filter.tendsto.comp Filter.Tendsto.comp
protected theorem Tendsto.iterate {f : α → α} {l : Filter α} (h : Tendsto f l l) :
∀ n, Tendsto (f^[n]) l l
| 0 => tendsto_id
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
theorem Tendsto.mono_left {f : α → β} {x y : Filter α} {z : Filter β} (hx : Tendsto f x z)
(h : y ≤ x) : Tendsto f y z :=
(map_mono h).trans hx
#align filter.tendsto.mono_left Filter.Tendsto.mono_left
theorem Tendsto.mono_right {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y z : Filter β} (hy : Tendsto f x y)
(hz : y ≤ z) : Tendsto f x z :=
le_trans hy hz
#align filter.tendsto.mono_right Filter.Tendsto.mono_right
theorem Tendsto.neBot {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} (h : Tendsto f x y) [hx : NeBot x] :
NeBot y :=
(hx.map _).mono h
#align filter.tendsto.ne_bot Filter.Tendsto.neBot
theorem tendsto_map {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} : Tendsto f x (map f x) :=
le_refl (map f x)
#align filter.tendsto_map Filter.tendsto_map
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_map'_iff {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f (map g x) y ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ g) x y := by
rw [Tendsto, Tendsto, map_map]
#align filter.tendsto_map'_iff Filter.tendsto_map'_iff
alias ⟨_, tendsto_map'⟩ := tendsto_map'_iff
#align filter.tendsto_map' Filter.tendsto_map'
theorem tendsto_comap {f : α → β} {x : Filter β} : Tendsto f (comap f x) x :=
map_comap_le
#align filter.tendsto_comap Filter.tendsto_comap
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comap_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : Filter α} {c : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f a (c.comap g) ↔ Tendsto (g ∘ f) a c :=
⟨fun h => tendsto_comap.comp h, fun h => map_le_iff_le_comap.mp <| by rwa [map_map]⟩
#align filter.tendsto_comap_iff Filter.tendsto_comap_iff
theorem tendsto_comap'_iff {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {i : γ → α} (h : range i ∈ f) :
Tendsto (m ∘ i) (comap i f) g ↔ Tendsto m f g := by
rw [Tendsto, ← map_compose]
simp only [(· ∘ ·), map_comap_of_mem h, Tendsto]
#align filter.tendsto_comap'_iff Filter.tendsto_comap'_iff
theorem Tendsto.of_tendsto_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β} {c : Filter γ}
(hfg : Tendsto (g ∘ f) a c) (hg : comap g c ≤ b) : Tendsto f a b := by
rw [tendsto_iff_comap] at hfg ⊢
calc
a ≤ comap (g ∘ f) c := hfg
_ ≤ comap f b := by simpa [comap_comap] using comap_mono hg
#align filter.tendsto.of_tendsto_comp Filter.Tendsto.of_tendsto_comp
theorem comap_eq_of_inverse {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {φ : α → β} (ψ : β → α) (eq : ψ ∘ φ = id)
(hφ : Tendsto φ f g) (hψ : Tendsto ψ g f) : comap φ g = f := by
refine ((comap_mono <| map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hψ).trans ?_).antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hφ)
rw [comap_comap, eq, comap_id]
#align filter.comap_eq_of_inverse Filter.comap_eq_of_inverse
theorem map_eq_of_inverse {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {φ : α → β} (ψ : β → α) (eq : φ ∘ ψ = id)
(hφ : Tendsto φ f g) (hψ : Tendsto ψ g f) : map φ f = g := by
refine le_antisymm hφ (le_trans ?_ (map_mono hψ))
rw [map_map, eq, map_id]
#align filter.map_eq_of_inverse Filter.map_eq_of_inverse
theorem tendsto_inf {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y₁ y₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f x (y₁ ⊓ y₂) ↔ Tendsto f x y₁ ∧ Tendsto f x y₂ := by
simp only [Tendsto, le_inf_iff, iff_self_iff]
#align filter.tendsto_inf Filter.tendsto_inf
theorem tendsto_inf_left {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : Filter α} {y : Filter β} (h : Tendsto f x₁ y) :
Tendsto f (x₁ ⊓ x₂) y :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) h
#align filter.tendsto_inf_left Filter.tendsto_inf_left
theorem tendsto_inf_right {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : Filter α} {y : Filter β} (h : Tendsto f x₂ y) :
Tendsto f (x₁ ⊓ x₂) y :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) h
#align filter.tendsto_inf_right Filter.tendsto_inf_right
theorem Tendsto.inf {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : Filter α} {y₁ y₂ : Filter β} (h₁ : Tendsto f x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : Tendsto f x₂ y₂) : Tendsto f (x₁ ⊓ x₂) (y₁ ⊓ y₂) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_inf_left h₁, tendsto_inf_right h₂⟩
#align filter.tendsto.inf Filter.Tendsto.inf
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_iInf {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y : ι → Filter β} :
Tendsto f x (⨅ i, y i) ↔ ∀ i, Tendsto f x (y i) := by
simp only [Tendsto, iff_self_iff, le_iInf_iff]
#align filter.tendsto_infi Filter.tendsto_iInf
theorem tendsto_iInf' {f : α → β} {x : ι → Filter α} {y : Filter β} (i : ι)
(hi : Tendsto f (x i) y) : Tendsto f (⨅ i, x i) y :=
hi.mono_left <| iInf_le _ _
#align filter.tendsto_infi' Filter.tendsto_iInf'
theorem tendsto_iInf_iInf {f : α → β} {x : ι → Filter α} {y : ι → Filter β}
(h : ∀ i, Tendsto f (x i) (y i)) : Tendsto f (iInf x) (iInf y) :=
tendsto_iInf.2 fun i => tendsto_iInf' i (h i)
#align filter.tendsto_infi_infi Filter.tendsto_iInf_iInf
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_sup {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : Filter α} {y : Filter β} :
Tendsto f (x₁ ⊔ x₂) y ↔ Tendsto f x₁ y ∧ Tendsto f x₂ y := by
simp only [Tendsto, map_sup, sup_le_iff]
#align filter.tendsto_sup Filter.tendsto_sup
theorem Tendsto.sup {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : Filter α} {y : Filter β} :
Tendsto f x₁ y → Tendsto f x₂ y → Tendsto f (x₁ ⊔ x₂) y := fun h₁ h₂ => tendsto_sup.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align filter.tendsto.sup Filter.Tendsto.sup
theorem Tendsto.sup_sup {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : Filter α} {y₁ y₂ : Filter β}
(h₁ : Tendsto f x₁ y₁) (h₂ : Tendsto f x₂ y₂) : Tendsto f (x₁ ⊔ x₂) (y₁ ⊔ y₂) :=
tendsto_sup.mpr ⟨h₁.mono_right le_sup_left, h₂.mono_right le_sup_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_iSup {f : α → β} {x : ι → Filter α} {y : Filter β} :
Tendsto f (⨆ i, x i) y ↔ ∀ i, Tendsto f (x i) y := by simp only [Tendsto, map_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
#align filter.tendsto_supr Filter.tendsto_iSup
theorem tendsto_iSup_iSup {f : α → β} {x : ι → Filter α} {y : ι → Filter β}
(h : ∀ i, Tendsto f (x i) (y i)) : Tendsto f (iSup x) (iSup y) :=
tendsto_iSup.2 fun i => (h i).mono_right <| le_iSup _ _
#align filter.tendsto_supr_supr Filter.tendsto_iSup_iSup
@[simp] theorem tendsto_principal {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
Tendsto f l (𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ᶠ a in l, f a ∈ s := by
simp only [Tendsto, le_principal_iff, mem_map', Filter.Eventually]
#align filter.tendsto_principal Filter.tendsto_principal
-- Porting note: was a `simp` lemma
theorem tendsto_principal_principal {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
Tendsto f (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t := by
simp only [tendsto_principal, eventually_principal]
#align filter.tendsto_principal_principal Filter.tendsto_principal_principal
@[simp] theorem tendsto_pure {f : α → β} {a : Filter α} {b : β} :
Tendsto f a (pure b) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in a, f x = b := by
simp only [Tendsto, le_pure_iff, mem_map', mem_singleton_iff, Filter.Eventually]
#align filter.tendsto_pure Filter.tendsto_pure
theorem tendsto_pure_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) : Tendsto f (pure a) (pure (f a)) :=
tendsto_pure.2 rfl
#align filter.tendsto_pure_pure Filter.tendsto_pure_pure
theorem tendsto_const_pure {a : Filter α} {b : β} : Tendsto (fun _ => b) a (pure b) :=
tendsto_pure.2 <| univ_mem' fun _ => rfl
#align filter.tendsto_const_pure Filter.tendsto_const_pure
theorem pure_le_iff {a : α} {l : Filter α} : pure a ≤ l ↔ ∀ s ∈ l, a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.pure_le_iff Filter.pure_le_iff
theorem tendsto_pure_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto f (pure a) l ↔ ∀ s ∈ l, f a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_pure_left Filter.tendsto_pure_left
@[simp]
theorem map_inf_principal_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} {l : Filter α} :
map f (l ⊓ 𝓟 (f ⁻¹' s)) = map f l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
Filter.ext fun t => by simp only [mem_map', mem_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage]
#align filter.map_inf_principal_preimage Filter.map_inf_principal_preimage
/-- If two filters are disjoint, then a function cannot tend to both of them along a non-trivial
filter. -/
theorem Tendsto.not_tendsto {f : α → β} {a : Filter α} {b₁ b₂ : Filter β} (hf : Tendsto f a b₁)
[NeBot a] (hb : Disjoint b₁ b₂) : ¬Tendsto f a b₂ := fun hf' =>
(tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hf, hf'⟩).neBot.ne hb.eq_bot
#align filter.tendsto.not_tendsto Filter.Tendsto.not_tendsto
protected theorem Tendsto.if {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop}
[∀ x, Decidable (p x)] (h₀ : Tendsto f (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 { x | p x }) l₂)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 { x | ¬p x }) l₂) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [tendsto_def, mem_inf_principal] at *
intro s hs
filter_upwards [h₀ s hs, h₁ s hs] with x hp₀ hp₁
rw [mem_preimage]
split_ifs with h
exacts [hp₀ h, hp₁ h]
#align filter.tendsto.if Filter.Tendsto.if
protected theorem Tendsto.if' {α β : Type*} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {f g : α → β}
{p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (hg : Tendsto g l₁ l₂) :
Tendsto (fun a => if p a then f a else g a) l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_inf_left hf).if (tendsto_inf_left hg)
#align filter.tendsto.if' Filter.Tendsto.if'
protected theorem Tendsto.piecewise {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α}
[∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] (h₀ : Tendsto f (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 s) l₂) (h₁ : Tendsto g (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ) l₂) :
Tendsto (piecewise s f g) l₁ l₂ :=
Tendsto.if h₀ h₁
#align filter.tendsto.piecewise Filter.Tendsto.piecewise
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
#align set.eq_on.eventually_eq Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
#align set.eq_on.eventually_eq_of_mem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.eventually_of_forall h
#align has_subset.subset.eventually_le HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE
theorem Set.MapsTo.tendsto {α β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (h : MapsTo f s t) :
Filter.Tendsto f (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t) :=
Filter.tendsto_principal_principal.2 h
#align set.maps_to.tendsto Set.MapsTo.tendsto
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto {f' : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g : γ → α} {lc : Filter γ}
(hg : Tendsto g lc l) : f ∘ g =ᶠ[lc] f' ∘ g :=
hg.eventually H
#align filter.eventually_eq.comp_tendsto Filter.EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto
theorem Filter.map_mapsTo_Iic_iff_tendsto {m : α → β} :
MapsTo (map m) (Iic F) (Iic G) ↔ Tendsto m F G :=
⟨fun hm ↦ hm right_mem_Iic, fun hm _ ↦ hm.mono_left⟩
alias ⟨_, Filter.Tendsto.map_mapsTo_Iic⟩ := Filter.map_mapsTo_Iic_iff_tendsto
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 3,352 | 3,354 | theorem Filter.map_mapsTo_Iic_iff_mapsTo {m : α → β} :
MapsTo (map m) (Iic <| 𝓟 s) (Iic <| 𝓟 t) ↔ MapsTo m s t := by |
rw [map_mapsTo_Iic_iff_tendsto, tendsto_principal_principal, MapsTo]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 153 | 165 | theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by |
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.