Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
#align_import category_theory.extensive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
/-!
# Universal colimits and van Kampen colimits
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.IsUniversalColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal
if it is stable under pullbacks.
- `CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van
Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`,
`c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/van+Kampen+colimit
- [Stephen Lack and Paweł Sobociński, Adhesive Categories][adhesive2004]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {K : Type*} [Category K] {D : Type*} [Category D]
section NatTrans
/-- A natural transformation is equifibered if every commutative square of the following form is
a pullback.
```
F(X) → F(Y)
↓ ↓
G(X) → G(Y)
```
-/
def NatTrans.Equifibered {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j : J⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), IsPullback (F.map f) (α.app i) (α.app j) (G.map f)
#align category_theory.nat_trans.equifibered CategoryTheory.NatTrans.Equifibered
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α] : Equifibered α :=
fun _ _ f => IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨NatTrans.naturality _ f⟩
#align category_theory.nat_trans.equifibered_of_is_iso CategoryTheory.NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.comp {F G H : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} (hα : Equifibered α)
(hβ : Equifibered β) : Equifibered (α ≫ β) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).paste_vert (hβ f)
#align category_theory.nat_trans.equifibered.comp CategoryTheory.NatTrans.Equifibered.comp
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerRight {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (hα : Equifibered α)
(H : C ⥤ D) [∀ (i j : J) (f : j ⟶ i), PreservesLimit (cospan (α.app i) (G.map f)) H] :
Equifibered (whiskerRight α H) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).map H
#align category_theory.nat_trans.equifibered.whisker_right CategoryTheory.NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerRight
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerLeft {K : Type*} [Category K] {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G}
(hα : Equifibered α) (H : K ⥤ J) : Equifibered (whiskerLeft H α) :=
fun _ _ f => hα (H.map f)
theorem mapPair_equifibered {F F' : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ F') :
NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩
all_goals
dsimp; simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩
#align category_theory.map_pair_equifibered CategoryTheory.mapPair_equifibered
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_discrete {ι : Type*} {F G : Discrete ι ⥤ C}
(α : F ⟶ G) : NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩
simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by rw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]⟩
end NatTrans
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal if it is stable under pullbacks. -/
def IsUniversalColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
(∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)) → Nonempty (IsColimit c')
#align category_theory.is_universal_colimit CategoryTheory.IsUniversalColimit
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the
pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`, `c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
TODO: Show that this is iff the functor `C ⥤ Catᵒᵖ` sending `x` to `C/x` preserves it.
TODO: Show that this is iff the inclusion functor `C ⥤ Span(C)` preserves it.
-/
def IsVanKampenColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ ∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)
#align category_theory.is_van_kampen_colimit CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.isUniversal {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun _ c' α f h hα => (H c' α f h hα).mpr
#align category_theory.is_van_kampen_colimit.is_universal CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit.isUniversal
/-- A universal colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsUniversalColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsUniversalColimit c) : IsColimit c := by
refine ((h c (𝟙 F) (𝟙 c.pt : _) (by rw [Functor.map_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp])
(NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) fun j => ?_).some
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 c.pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by erw [NatTrans.id_app, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩
/-- A van Kampen colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsVanKampenColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsColimit c :=
h.isUniversal.isColimit
#align category_theory.is_van_kampen_colimit.is_colimit CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit.isColimit
theorem IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit [HasStrictInitialObjects C] {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) :
IsVanKampenColimit (asEmptyCocone X) := by
intro F' c' α f hf hα
have : F' = Functor.empty C := by apply Functor.hext <;> rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
subst this
haveI := h.isIso_to f
refine ⟨by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩,
fun _ => ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit h (Cocones.ext (asIso f).symm <| by rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩)⟩⟩
#align category_theory.is_initial.is_van_kampen_colimit CategoryTheory.IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit
section Functor
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsUniversalColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα H
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
apply hc c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα
intro j
rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
have : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsVanKampenColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
rw [H c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα]
apply forall_congr'
intro j
conv_lhs => rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
haveI : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩).paste_vert_iff (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
#align category_theory.is_van_kampen_colimit.of_iso CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα
refine (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _))).trans ?_
apply forall_congr'
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
have : IsPullback (α.app j ≫ c.ι.app j) (α.app j) (𝟙 _) (c.ι.app j) :=
IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩
rw [← IsPullback.paste_vert_iff this _, Category.comp_id]
exact (congr_app e j).symm
theorem IsUniversalColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα H
apply (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)))
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} : IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso (inv α) hc)
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)),
IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso α⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G] [ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(hc : IsUniversalColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun F' c' α f h hα H ↦
⟨ReflectsColimit.reflects (hc (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G) (fun j ↦ (H j).map G)).some⟩
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[∀ (i j : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ F.obj j) (g : i ⟶ j), PreservesLimit (cospan f (F.map g)) G]
[∀ (i : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan f (c.ι.app i)) G]
[ReflectsLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G]
[PreservesColimitsOfShape J G]
[ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(H : IsVanKampenColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
intro F' c' α f h hα
refine (Iff.trans ?_ (H (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G))).trans (forall_congr' fun j => ?_)
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨isColimitOfPreserves G h.some⟩, fun h => ⟨isColimitOfReflects G h.some⟩⟩
· exact IsPullback.map_iff G (NatTrans.congr_app h.symm j)
#align category_theory.is_van_kampen_colimit.of_map CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.mapCocone_iff (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[G.IsEquivalence] : IsVanKampenColimit (G.mapCocone c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone G, fun hc ↦ by
let e : F ⋙ G ⋙ Functor.inv G ≅ F := NatIso.hcomp (Iso.refl F) G.asEquivalence.unitIso.symm
apply IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone G.inv
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff e.inv).mp
exact hc.of_iso (Cocones.ext (G.asEquivalence.unitIso.app c.pt) (fun j => (by simp [e])))⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit (c.whisker e.functor) := by
intro F' c' α f e' hα H
convert hc (c'.whisker e.inverse) (whiskerLeft e.inverse α ≫ (e.invFunIdAssoc F).hom) f ?_
((hα.whiskerLeft _).comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) ?_ using 1
· exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv e.symm).nonempty_congr
· convert congr_arg (whiskerLeft e.inverse) e'
ext
simp
· intro k
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
refine (H (e.inverse.obj k)).paste_vert ?_
have : IsIso (𝟙 (Cocone.whisker e.functor c).pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} :
IsUniversalColimit (c.whisker e.functor) ↔ IsUniversalColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ ((hc.whiskerEquivalence e.symm).precompose_isIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F).inv).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)), IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence e⟩
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit (c.whisker e.functor) := by
intro F' c' α f e' hα
convert hc (c'.whisker e.inverse) (whiskerLeft e.inverse α ≫ (e.invFunIdAssoc F).hom) f ?_
((hα.whiskerLeft _).comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) using 1
· exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv e.symm).nonempty_congr
· simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Cocone.whisker_pt, Cocone.whisker_ι,
whiskerLeft_app, NatTrans.comp_app, Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc_hom_app, Functor.id_obj]
constructor
· intro H k
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
refine (H (e.inverse.obj k)).paste_vert ?_
have : IsIso (𝟙 (Cocone.whisker e.functor c).pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
· intro H j
have : α.app j
= F'.map (e.unit.app _) ≫ α.app _ ≫ F.map (e.counit.app (e.functor.obj j)) := by
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
rw [← Category.id_comp f, this]
refine IsPullback.paste_vert ?_ (H (e.functor.obj j))
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
· ext k
simpa using congr_app e' (e.inverse.obj k)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} :
IsVanKampenColimit (c.whisker e.functor) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ ((hc.whiskerEquivalence e.symm).precompose_isIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F).inv).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)), IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence e⟩
theorem isVanKampenColimit_of_evaluation [HasPullbacks D] [HasColimitsOfShape J D] (F : J ⥤ C ⥤ D)
(c : Cocone F) (hc : ∀ x : C, IsVanKampenColimit (((evaluation C D).obj x).mapCocone c)) :
IsVanKampenColimit c := by
intro F' c' α f e hα
have := fun x => hc x (((evaluation C D).obj x).mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α _)
(((evaluation C D).obj x).map f)
(by
ext y
dsimp
exact NatTrans.congr_app (NatTrans.congr_app e y) x)
(hα.whiskerRight _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨hc'⟩ j
refine ⟨⟨(NatTrans.congr_app e j).symm⟩, ⟨evaluationJointlyReflectsLimits _ ?_⟩⟩
refine fun x => (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm ?_
exact ((this x).mp ⟨PreservesColimit.preserves hc'⟩ _).isLimit
· exact fun H => ⟨evaluationJointlyReflectsColimits _ fun x =>
((this x).mpr fun j => (H j).map ((evaluation C D).obj x)).some⟩
#align category_theory.is_van_kampen_colimit_of_evaluation CategoryTheory.isVanKampenColimit_of_evaluation
end Functor
section reflective
theorem IsUniversalColimit.map_reflective
{Gl : C ⥤ D} {Gr : D ⥤ C} (adj : Gl ⊣ Gr) [Gr.Full] [Gr.Faithful]
{F : J ⥤ D} {c : Cocone (F ⋙ Gr)}
(H : IsUniversalColimit c)
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), HasPullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)]
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)) Gl] :
IsUniversalColimit (Gl.mapCocone c) := by
have := adj.rightAdjointPreservesLimits
have : PreservesColimitsOfSize.{u', v'} Gl := adj.leftAdjointPreservesColimits
intros F' c' α f h hα hc'
have : HasPullback (Gl.map (Gr.map f)) (Gl.map (adj.unit.app c.pt)) :=
⟨⟨_, isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit _ pullback.condition
(IsPullback.of_hasPullback _ _).isLimit⟩⟩
let α' := α ≫ (Functor.associator _ _ _).hom ≫ whiskerLeft F adj.counit ≫ F.rightUnitor.hom
have hα' : NatTrans.Equifibered α' := hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)
have hadj : ∀ X, Gl.map (adj.unit.app X) = inv (adj.counit.app _) := by
intro X
apply IsIso.eq_inv_of_inv_hom_id
exact adj.left_triangle_components _
haveI : ∀ X, IsIso (Gl.map (adj.unit.app X)) := by
simp_rw [hadj]
infer_instance
have hα'' : ∀ j, Gl.map (Gr.map <| α'.app j) = adj.counit.app _ ≫ α.app j := by
intro j
rw [← cancel_mono (adj.counit.app <| F.obj j)]
dsimp [α']
simp only [Category.comp_id, Adjunction.counit_naturality_assoc, Category.id_comp,
Adjunction.counit_naturality, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp]
have hc'' : ∀ j, α.app j ≫ Gl.map (c.ι.app j) = c'.ι.app j ≫ f := NatTrans.congr_app h
let β := isoWhiskerLeft F' (asIso adj.counit) ≪≫ F'.rightUnitor
let c'' : Cocone (F' ⋙ Gr) := by
refine
{ pt := pullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app _)
ι := { app := fun j ↦ pullback.lift (Gr.map <| c'.ι.app j) (Gr.map (α'.app j) ≫ c.ι.app j) ?_
naturality := ?_ } }
· rw [← Gr.map_comp, ← hc'']
erw [← adj.unit_naturality]
rw [Gl.map_comp, hα'']
dsimp
simp only [Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp, adj.right_triangle_components_assoc]
· intros i j g
dsimp [α']
ext
all_goals simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc,
← Functor.map_comp, pullback.lift_fst, pullback.lift_snd, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc]
· congr 1
exact c'.w _
· rw [α.naturality_assoc]
dsimp
rw [adj.counit_naturality, ← Category.assoc, Gr.map_comp_assoc]
congr 1
exact c.w _
let cf : (Cocones.precompose β.hom).obj c' ⟶ Gl.mapCocone c'' := by
refine { hom := pullback.lift ?_ f ?_ ≫ (PreservesPullback.iso _ _ _).inv, w := ?_ }
· exact inv <| adj.counit.app c'.pt
· rw [IsIso.inv_comp_eq, ← adj.counit_naturality_assoc f, ← cancel_mono (adj.counit.app <|
Gl.obj c.pt), Category.assoc, Category.assoc, adj.left_triangle_components]
erw [Category.comp_id]
rfl
· intro j
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.comp_inv_eq]
ext
all_goals simp only [PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst, PreservesPullback.iso_hom_snd,
pullback.lift_fst, pullback.lift_snd, Category.assoc,
Functor.mapCocone_ι_app, ← Gl.map_comp]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, adj.counit_naturality]
dsimp [β]
rw [Category.comp_id]
· rw [Gl.map_comp, hα'', Category.assoc, hc'']
dsimp [β]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc]
have : cf.hom ≫ (PreservesPullback.iso _ _ _).hom ≫ pullback.fst ≫ adj.counit.app _ = 𝟙 _ := by
simp only [IsIso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Category.assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc]
have : IsIso cf := by
apply @Cocones.cocone_iso_of_hom_iso (i := ?_)
rw [← IsIso.eq_comp_inv] at this
rw [this]
infer_instance
have ⟨Hc''⟩ := H c'' (whiskerRight α' Gr) pullback.snd ?_ (hα'.whiskerRight Gr) ?_
· exact ⟨IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv β c' <|
(isColimitOfPreserves Gl Hc'').ofIsoColimit (asIso cf).symm⟩
· ext j
dsimp
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc,
Functor.map_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
· intro j
apply IsPullback.of_right _ _ (IsPullback.of_hasPullback _ _)
· dsimp [α']
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp,
pullback.lift_fst]
rw [← Category.comp_id (Gr.map f)]
refine ((hc' j).map Gr).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨?_⟩)
rw [← adj.unit_naturality, Category.comp_id, ← Category.assoc,
← Category.id_comp (Gr.map ((Gl.mapCocone c).ι.app j))]
congr 1
rw [← cancel_mono (Gr.map (adj.counit.app (F.obj j)))]
dsimp
simp only [Category.comp_id, Adjunction.right_triangle_components, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
· dsimp
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp,
pullback.lift_snd]
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.map_reflective [HasColimitsOfShape J C]
{Gl : C ⥤ D} {Gr : D ⥤ C} (adj : Gl ⊣ Gr) [Gr.Full] [Gr.Faithful]
{F : J ⥤ D} {c : Cocone (F ⋙ Gr)} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), HasPullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)]
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)) Gl]
[∀ X i (f : X ⟶ c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan f (c.ι.app i)) Gl] :
IsVanKampenColimit (Gl.mapCocone c) := by
have := adj.rightAdjointPreservesLimits
have : PreservesColimitsOfSize.{u', v'} Gl := adj.leftAdjointPreservesColimits
intro F' c' α f h hα
refine ⟨?_, H.isUniversal.map_reflective adj c' α f h hα⟩
intro ⟨hc'⟩ j
let α' := α ≫ (Functor.associator _ _ _).hom ≫ whiskerLeft F adj.counit ≫ F.rightUnitor.hom
have hα' : NatTrans.Equifibered α' := hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)
have hα'' : ∀ j, Gl.map (Gr.map <| α'.app j) = adj.counit.app _ ≫ α.app j := by
intro j
rw [← cancel_mono (adj.counit.app <| F.obj j)]
dsimp [α']
simp only [Category.comp_id, Adjunction.counit_naturality_assoc, Category.id_comp,
Adjunction.counit_naturality, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp]
let β := isoWhiskerLeft F' (asIso adj.counit) ≪≫ F'.rightUnitor
let hl := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv β c').symm hc'
let hr := isColimitOfPreserves Gl (colimit.isColimit <| F' ⋙ Gr)
have : α.app j = β.inv.app _ ≫ Gl.map (Gr.map <| α'.app j) := by
rw [hα'']
simp [β]
rw [this]
have : f = (hl.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hr).hom ≫
Gl.map (colimit.desc _ ⟨_, whiskerRight α' Gr ≫ c.2⟩) := by
symm
convert @IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_desc _ _ _ _ ((F' ⋙ Gr) ⋙ Gl)
(Gl.mapCocone ⟨_, (whiskerRight α' Gr ≫ c.2 : _)⟩) _ _ hl hr using 2
· apply hr.hom_ext
intro j
rw [hr.fac, Functor.mapCocone_ι_app, ← Gl.map_comp, colimit.cocone_ι, colimit.ι_desc]
rfl
· clear_value α'
apply hl.hom_ext
intro j
rw [hl.fac]
dsimp [β]
simp only [Category.comp_id, hα'', Category.assoc, Gl.map_comp]
congr 1
exact (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
rw [this]
have := ((H (colimit.cocone <| F' ⋙ Gr) (whiskerRight α' Gr)
(colimit.desc _ ⟨_, whiskerRight α' Gr ≫ c.2⟩) ?_ (hα'.whiskerRight Gr)).mp
⟨(getColimitCocone <| F' ⋙ Gr).2⟩ j).map Gl
· convert IsPullback.paste_vert _ this
refine IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨?_⟩
rw [← IsIso.inv_comp_eq, ← Category.assoc, NatIso.inv_inv_app]
exact IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom hl hr _
· clear_value α'
ext j
simp
end reflective
section Initial
theorem hasStrictInitial_of_isUniversal [HasInitial C]
(H : IsUniversalColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 (⊥_ C)) (𝟙 (⊥_ C)))) : HasStrictInitialObjects C :=
hasStrictInitialObjects_of_initial_is_strict
(by
intro A f
suffices IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A)) by
obtain ⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩ := Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' this (f ≫ initial.to A) (𝟙 A)
rcases(Category.id_comp _).symm.trans h₂ with rfl
exact ⟨⟨_, ((Category.id_comp _).symm.trans h₁).symm, initialIsInitial.hom_ext _ _⟩⟩
refine (H (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)) (mapPair f f) f (by ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp)
(mapPair_equifibered _) ?_).some
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;>
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨(Category.id_comp _).trans (Category.comp_id _).symm⟩)
#align category_theory.has_strict_initial_of_is_universal CategoryTheory.hasStrictInitial_of_isUniversal
theorem isVanKampenColimit_of_isEmpty [HasStrictInitialObjects C] [IsEmpty J] {F : J ⥤ C}
(c : Cocone F) (hc : IsColimit c) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
have : IsInitial c.pt := by
have := (IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv (Functor.uniqueFromEmpty _) _).symm
(hc.whiskerEquivalence (equivalenceOfIsEmpty (Discrete PEmpty.{1}) J))
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit this (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl c.pt) (fun {X} ↦ isEmptyElim X))
replace this := IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit this
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff
(equivalenceOfIsEmpty (Discrete PEmpty.{1}) J)).mp
exact (this.precompose_isIso (Functor.uniqueFromEmpty
((equivalenceOfIsEmpty (Discrete PEmpty.{1}) J).functor ⋙ F)).hom).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
end Initial
section BinaryCoproduct
variable {X Y : C}
theorem BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_iff (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
IsVanKampenColimit c ↔
∀ {X' Y' : C} (c' : BinaryCofan X' Y') (αX : X' ⟶ X) (αY : Y' ⟶ Y) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : αX ≫ c.inl = c'.inl ≫ f) (_ : αY ≫ c.inr = c'.inr ≫ f),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ IsPullback c'.inl αX f c.inl ∧ IsPullback c'.inr αY f c.inr := by
constructor
· introv H hαX hαY
rw [H c' (mapPair αX αY) f (by ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> assumption) (mapPair_equifibered _)]
constructor
· intro H
exact ⟨H _, H _⟩
· rintro H ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [H.1, H.2]
· introv H F' hα h
let X' := F'.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
let Y' := F'.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
have : F' = pair X' Y' := by
apply Functor.hext
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩ <;> simp
clear_value X' Y'
subst this
change BinaryCofan X' Y' at c'
rw [H c' _ _ _ (NatTrans.congr_app hα ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩)
(NatTrans.congr_app hα ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)]
constructor
· rintro H ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [H.1, H.2]
· intro H
exact ⟨H _, H _⟩
#align category_theory.binary_cofan.is_van_kampen_iff CategoryTheory.BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_iff
theorem BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_mk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y)
(cofans : ∀ X Y : C, BinaryCofan X Y) (colimits : ∀ X Y, IsColimit (cofans X Y))
(cones : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z), PullbackCone f g)
(limits : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z), IsLimit (cones f g))
(h₁ : ∀ {X' Y' : C} (αX : X' ⟶ X) (αY : Y' ⟶ Y) (f : (cofans X' Y').pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : αX ≫ c.inl = (cofans X' Y').inl ≫ f) (_ : αY ≫ c.inr = (cofans X' Y').inr ≫ f),
IsPullback (cofans X' Y').inl αX f c.inl ∧ IsPullback (cofans X' Y').inr αY f c.inr)
(h₂ : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ c.pt),
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (cones f c.inl).fst (cones f c.inr).fst)) :
IsVanKampenColimit c := by
rw [BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_iff]
introv hX hY
constructor
· rintro ⟨h⟩
let e := h.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimits _ _)
obtain ⟨hl, hr⟩ := h₁ αX αY (e.inv ≫ f) (by simp [e, hX]) (by simp [e, hY])
constructor
· rw [← Category.id_comp αX, ← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc e f]
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 X') := inferInstance
have : c'.inl ≫ e.hom = 𝟙 X' ≫ (cofans X' Y').inl := by
dsimp [e]
simp
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨this⟩).paste_vert hl
· rw [← Category.id_comp αY, ← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc e f]
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 Y') := inferInstance
have : c'.inr ≫ e.hom = 𝟙 Y' ≫ (cofans X' Y').inr := by
dsimp [e]
simp
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨this⟩).paste_vert hr
· rintro ⟨H₁, H₂⟩
refine ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ?_ <| (isoBinaryCofanMk _).symm⟩
let e₁ : X' ≅ _ := H₁.isLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limits _ _)
let e₂ : Y' ≅ _ := H₂.isLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limits _ _)
have he₁ : c'.inl = e₁.hom ≫ (cones f c.inl).fst := by simp [e₁]
have he₂ : c'.inr = e₂.hom ≫ (cones f c.inr).fst := by simp [e₂]
rw [he₁, he₂]
apply BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso (BinaryCofan.mk _ _)
apply BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso (BinaryCofan.mk _ _)
exact h₂ f
#align category_theory.binary_cofan.is_van_kampen_mk CategoryTheory.BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_mk
theorem BinaryCofan.mono_inr_of_isVanKampen [HasInitial C] {X Y : C} {c : BinaryCofan X Y}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : Mono c.inr := by
refine PullbackCone.mono_of_isLimitMkIdId _ (IsPullback.isLimit ?_)
refine (h (BinaryCofan.mk (initial.to Y) (𝟙 Y)) (mapPair (initial.to X) (𝟙 Y)) c.inr ?_
(mapPair_equifibered _)).mp ⟨?_⟩ ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
· ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp; simp
· exact ((BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr initialIsInitial _).mpr (by
dsimp
infer_instance)).some
#align category_theory.binary_cofan.mono_inr_of_is_van_kampen CategoryTheory.BinaryCofan.mono_inr_of_isVanKampen
theorem BinaryCofan.isPullback_initial_to_of_isVanKampen [HasInitial C] {c : BinaryCofan X Y}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsPullback (initial.to _) (initial.to _) c.inl c.inr := by
refine ((h (BinaryCofan.mk (initial.to Y) (𝟙 Y)) (mapPair (initial.to X) (𝟙 Y)) c.inr ?_
(mapPair_equifibered _)).mp ⟨?_⟩ ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).flip
· ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp; simp
· exact ((BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr initialIsInitial _).mpr (by
dsimp
infer_instance)).some
#align category_theory.binary_cofan.is_pullback_initial_to_of_is_van_kampen CategoryTheory.BinaryCofan.isPullback_initial_to_of_isVanKampen
end BinaryCoproduct
section FiniteCoproducts
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/VanKampen.lean | 603 | 658 | theorem isUniversalColimit_extendCofan {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → C)
{c₁ : Cofan fun i : Fin n ↦ f i.succ} {c₂ : BinaryCofan (f 0) c₁.pt}
(t₁ : IsUniversalColimit c₁) (t₂ : IsUniversalColimit c₂)
[∀ {Z} (i : Z ⟶ c₂.pt), HasPullback c₂.inr i] :
IsUniversalColimit (extendCofan c₁ c₂) := by |
intro F c α i e hα H
let F' : Fin (n + 1) → C := F.obj ∘ Discrete.mk
have : F = Discrete.functor F' := by
apply Functor.hext
· exact fun i ↦ rfl
· rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩
simp [F']
have t₁' := @t₁ (Discrete.functor (fun j ↦ F.obj ⟨j.succ⟩))
(Cofan.mk (pullback c₂.inr i) fun j ↦ pullback.lift (α.app _ ≫ c₁.inj _) (c.ι.app _) ?_)
(Discrete.natTrans fun i ↦ α.app _) pullback.fst ?_ (NatTrans.equifibered_of_discrete _) ?_
rotate_left
· simpa only [Functor.const_obj_obj, pair_obj_right, Discrete.functor_obj, Category.assoc,
extendCofan_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app, extendCofan_ι_app,
Fin.cases_succ, Functor.const_map_app] using congr_app e ⟨j.succ⟩
· ext j
dsimp
simp only [limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app, Cofan.inj]
· intro j
simp only [pair_obj_right, Functor.const_obj_obj, Discrete.functor_obj, id_eq,
extendCofan_pt, eq_mpr_eq_cast, Cofan.mk_pt, Cofan.mk_ι_app, Discrete.natTrans_app]
refine IsPullback.of_right ?_ ?_ (IsPullback.of_hasPullback (BinaryCofan.inr c₂) i).flip
· simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, pair_obj_right, limit.lift_π,
PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app]
exact H _
· simp only [limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app, Cofan.inj]
obtain ⟨H₁⟩ := t₁'
have t₂' := @t₂ (pair (F.obj ⟨0⟩) (pullback c₂.inr i)) (BinaryCofan.mk (c.ι.app ⟨0⟩) pullback.snd)
(mapPair (α.app _) pullback.fst) i ?_ (mapPair_equifibered _) ?_
rotate_left
· ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· simpa [mapPair] using congr_app e ⟨0⟩
· simpa using pullback.condition
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· simp only [pair_obj_right, Functor.const_obj_obj, pair_obj_left, BinaryCofan.mk_pt,
BinaryCofan.ι_app_left, BinaryCofan.mk_inl, mapPair_left]
exact H ⟨0⟩
· simp only [pair_obj_right, Functor.const_obj_obj, BinaryCofan.mk_pt, BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,
BinaryCofan.mk_inr, mapPair_right]
exact (IsPullback.of_hasPullback (BinaryCofan.inr c₂) i).flip
obtain ⟨H₂⟩ := t₂'
clear_value F'
subst this
refine ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (extendCofanIsColimit
(fun i ↦ (Discrete.functor F').obj ⟨i⟩) H₁ H₂) <| Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) ?_⟩
dsimp
rintro ⟨j⟩
simp only [Discrete.functor_obj, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt,
PullbackCone.mk_π_app, Category.comp_id]
induction' j using Fin.inductionOn
· simp only [Fin.cases_zero]
· simp only [Fin.cases_succ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import data.finsupp.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f69db8cecc668e2d5894d7e9bfc491da60db3b9f"
/-!
# Miscellaneous definitions, lemmas, and constructions using finsupp
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp.graph`: the finset of input and output pairs with non-zero outputs.
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`: `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv.
* `Finsupp.mapDomain`: maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by a function and by summing.
* `Finsupp.comapDomain`: postcomposition of a `Finsupp` with a function injective on the preimage
of its support.
* `Finsupp.some`: restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported
function on `α`.
* `Finsupp.filter`: `filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true
and 0 otherwise.
* `Finsupp.frange`: the image of a finitely supported function on its support.
* `Finsupp.subtype_domain`: the restriction of a finitely supported function `f` to a subtype.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* This file is currently ~1600 lines long and is quite a miscellany of definitions and lemmas,
so it should be divided into smaller pieces.
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `graph` -/
section Graph
variable [Zero M]
/-- The graph of a finitely supported function over its support, i.e. the finset of input and output
pairs with non-zero outputs. -/
def graph (f : α →₀ M) : Finset (α × M) :=
f.support.map ⟨fun a => Prod.mk a (f a), fun _ _ h => (Prod.mk.inj h).1⟩
#align finsupp.graph Finsupp.graph
theorem mk_mem_graph_iff {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} : (a, m) ∈ f.graph ↔ f a = m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [graph, mem_map, mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, ha, rfl, -⟩
exact ⟨rfl, ha⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
#align finsupp.mk_mem_graph_iff Finsupp.mk_mem_graph_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff {c : α × M} {f : α →₀ M} : c ∈ f.graph ↔ f c.1 = c.2 ∧ c.2 ≠ 0 := by
cases c
exact mk_mem_graph_iff
#align finsupp.mem_graph_iff Finsupp.mem_graph_iff
theorem mk_mem_graph (f : α →₀ M) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ f.support) : (a, f a) ∈ f.graph :=
mk_mem_graph_iff.2 ⟨rfl, mem_support_iff.1 ha⟩
#align finsupp.mk_mem_graph Finsupp.mk_mem_graph
theorem apply_eq_of_mem_graph {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} (h : (a, m) ∈ f.graph) : f a = m :=
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).1
#align finsupp.apply_eq_of_mem_graph Finsupp.apply_eq_of_mem_graph
@[simp 1100] -- Porting note: change priority to appease `simpNF`
theorem not_mem_graph_snd_zero (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : (a, (0 : M)) ∉ f.graph := fun h =>
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).2.irrefl
#align finsupp.not_mem_graph_snd_zero Finsupp.not_mem_graph_snd_zero
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_graph [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ M) : f.graph.image Prod.fst = f.support := by
classical simp only [graph, map_eq_image, image_image, Embedding.coeFn_mk, (· ∘ ·), image_id']
#align finsupp.image_fst_graph Finsupp.image_fst_graph
theorem graph_injective (α M) [Zero M] : Injective (@graph α M _) := by
intro f g h
classical
have hsup : f.support = g.support := by rw [← image_fst_graph, h, image_fst_graph]
refine ext_iff'.2 ⟨hsup, fun x hx => apply_eq_of_mem_graph <| h.symm ▸ ?_⟩
exact mk_mem_graph _ (hsup ▸ hx)
#align finsupp.graph_injective Finsupp.graph_injective
@[simp]
theorem graph_inj {f g : α →₀ M} : f.graph = g.graph ↔ f = g :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff
#align finsupp.graph_inj Finsupp.graph_inj
@[simp]
theorem graph_zero : graph (0 : α →₀ M) = ∅ := by simp [graph]
#align finsupp.graph_zero Finsupp.graph_zero
@[simp]
theorem graph_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.graph = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff' graph_zero
#align finsupp.graph_eq_empty Finsupp.graph_eq_empty
end Graph
end Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
namespace Finsupp
section Equiv
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf' : f.symm 0 = 0) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f hf : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm hf' : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
#align finsupp.map_range.equiv Finsupp.mapRange.equiv
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_refl : mapRange.equiv (Equiv.refl M) rfl rfl = Equiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
Equiv.ext mapRange_id
#align finsupp.map_range.equiv_refl Finsupp.mapRange.equiv_refl
theorem mapRange.equiv_trans (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf') (f₂ : N ≃ P) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (hf₂') :
(mapRange.equiv (f.trans f₂) (by rw [Equiv.trans_apply, hf, hf₂])
(by rw [Equiv.symm_trans_apply, hf₂', hf']) :
(α →₀ _) ≃ _) =
(mapRange.equiv f hf hf').trans (mapRange.equiv f₂ hf₂ hf₂') :=
Equiv.ext <| mapRange_comp f₂ hf₂ f hf ((congrArg f₂ hf).trans hf₂)
#align finsupp.map_range.equiv_trans Finsupp.mapRange.equiv_trans
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_symm (f : M ≃ N) (hf hf') :
((mapRange.equiv f hf hf').symm : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) = mapRange.equiv f.symm hf' hf :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.map_range.equiv_symm Finsupp.mapRange.equiv_symm
end Equiv
section ZeroHom
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Composition with a fixed zero-preserving homomorphism is itself a zero-preserving homomorphism
on functions. -/
@[simps]
def mapRange.zeroHom (f : ZeroHom M N) : ZeroHom (α →₀ M) (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
#align finsupp.map_range.zero_hom Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_id : mapRange.zeroHom (ZeroHom.id M) = ZeroHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
ZeroHom.ext mapRange_id
#align finsupp.map_range.zero_hom_id Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom_id
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_comp (f : ZeroHom N P) (f₂ : ZeroHom M N) :
(mapRange.zeroHom (f.comp f₂) : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) =
(mapRange.zeroHom f).comp (mapRange.zeroHom f₂) :=
ZeroHom.ext <| mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
#align finsupp.map_range.zero_hom_comp Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom_comp
end ZeroHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [AddMonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Composition with a fixed additive homomorphism is itself an additive homomorphism on functions.
-/
@[simps]
def mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ N where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
map_add' a b := by dsimp only; exact mapRange_add f.map_add _ _; -- Porting note: `dsimp` needed
#align finsupp.map_range.add_monoid_hom Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_id :
mapRange.addMonoidHom (AddMonoidHom.id M) = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext mapRange_id
#align finsupp.map_range.add_monoid_hom_id Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom_id
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_comp (f : N →+ P) (f₂ : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f.comp f₂) : (α →₀ _) →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom f₂) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <|
mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
#align finsupp.map_range.add_monoid_hom_comp Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom_comp
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_toZeroHom (f : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).toZeroHom = (mapRange.zeroHom f.toZeroHom : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) :=
ZeroHom.ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.map_range.add_monoid_hom_to_zero_hom Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom_toZeroHom
theorem mapRange_multiset_sum (f : F) (m : Multiset (α →₀ M)) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) m.sum = (m.map fun x => mapRange f (map_zero f) x).sum :=
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ _) →+ _).map_multiset_sum _
#align finsupp.map_range_multiset_sum Finsupp.mapRange_multiset_sum
theorem mapRange_finset_sum (f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (∑ x ∈ s, g x) = ∑ x ∈ s, mapRange f (map_zero f) (g x) :=
map_sum (mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N)) _ _
#align finsupp.map_range_finset_sum Finsupp.mapRange_finset_sum
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange.AddMonoidHom` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.addEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ N) :=
{ mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl }
#align finsupp.map_range.add_equiv Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_refl : mapRange.addEquiv (AddEquiv.refl M) = AddEquiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
AddEquiv.ext mapRange_id
#align finsupp.map_range.add_equiv_refl Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv_refl
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_trans (f : M ≃+ N) (f₂ : N ≃+ P) :
(mapRange.addEquiv (f.trans f₂) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ P)) =
(mapRange.addEquiv f).trans (mapRange.addEquiv f₂) :=
AddEquiv.ext (mapRange_comp _ f₂.map_zero _ f.map_zero (by simp))
#align finsupp.map_range.add_equiv_trans Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv_trans
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_symm (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f).symm : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) = mapRange.addEquiv f.symm :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.map_range.add_equiv_symm Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toAddMonoidHom (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) : _ →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ _) →+ _) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.map_range.add_equiv_to_add_monoid_hom Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv_toAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) :
↑(mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) =
(mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) f.map_zero f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.map_range.add_equiv_to_equiv Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv
end AddMonoidHom
end Finsupp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `equivCongrLeft` -/
section EquivCongrLeft
variable [Zero M]
namespace Finsupp
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, we can map `l : α →₀ M` to `equivMapDomain f l : β →₀ M` (computably)
by mapping the support forwards and the function backwards. -/
def equivMapDomain (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := l.support.map f.toEmbedding
toFun a := l (f.symm a)
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [Finset.mem_map_equiv, mem_support_toFun]; rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain Finsupp.equivMapDomain
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (b : β) :
equivMapDomain f l b = l (f.symm b) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_apply Finsupp.equivMapDomain_apply
theorem equivMapDomain_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : β →₀ M) (a : α) :
equivMapDomain f.symm l a = l (f a) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_symm_apply Finsupp.equivMapDomain_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_refl (l : α →₀ M) : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) l = l := by ext x; rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_refl Finsupp.equivMapDomain_refl
theorem equivMapDomain_refl' : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) = @id (α →₀ M) := by ext x; rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_refl' Finsupp.equivMapDomain_refl'
theorem equivMapDomain_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain (f.trans g) l = equivMapDomain g (equivMapDomain f l) := by ext x; rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_trans Finsupp.equivMapDomain_trans
theorem equivMapDomain_trans' (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
@equivMapDomain _ _ M _ (f.trans g) = equivMapDomain g ∘ equivMapDomain f := by ext x; rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_trans' Finsupp.equivMapDomain_trans'
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_single (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : M) :
equivMapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b := by
classical
ext x
simp only [single_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, equivMapDomain_apply]
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_single Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_zero {f : α ≃ β} : equivMapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) := by
ext; simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_zero Finsupp.equivMapDomain_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_equivMapDomain [CommMonoid N] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (g : β → M → N):
prod (equivMapDomain f l) g = prod l (fun a m => g (f a) m) := by
simp [prod, equivMapDomain]
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, the finitely supported function spaces are also in bijection:
`(α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M)`.
This is the finitely-supported version of `Equiv.piCongrLeft`. -/
def equivCongrLeft (f : α ≃ β) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M) := by
refine ⟨equivMapDomain f, equivMapDomain f.symm, fun f => ?_, fun f => ?_⟩ <;> ext x <;>
simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
#align finsupp.equiv_congr_left Finsupp.equivCongrLeft
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : equivCongrLeft f l = equivMapDomain f l :=
rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_congr_left_apply Finsupp.equivCongrLeft_apply
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_symm (f : α ≃ β) :
(@equivCongrLeft _ _ M _ f).symm = equivCongrLeft f.symm :=
rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_congr_left_symm Finsupp.equivCongrLeft_symm
end Finsupp
end EquivCongrLeft
section CastFinsupp
variable [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M)
namespace Nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_prod [CommSemiring R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_prod _ _
#align nat.cast_finsupp_prod Nat.cast_finsupp_prod
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [CommSemiring R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_sum _ _
#align nat.cast_finsupp_sum Nat.cast_finsupp_sum
end Nat
namespace Int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_prod [CommRing R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_prod _ _
#align int.cast_finsupp_prod Int.cast_finsupp_prod
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [CommRing R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_sum _ _
#align int.cast_finsupp_sum Int.cast_finsupp_sum
end Int
namespace Rat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_sum _ _
#align rat.cast_finsupp_sum Rat.cast_finsupp_sum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_prod [Field R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_prod _ _
#align rat.cast_finsupp_prod Rat.cast_finsupp_prod
end Rat
end CastFinsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapDomain` -/
namespace Finsupp
section MapDomain
variable [AddCommMonoid M] {v v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M}
/-- Given `f : α → β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `mapDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `a : β` is the sum
of `v x` over all `x` such that `f x = a`. -/
def mapDomain (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M :=
v.sum fun a => single (f a)
#align finsupp.map_domain Finsupp.mapDomain
theorem mapDomain_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : α →₀ M) (a : α) :
mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum_eq_single a, single_eq_same]
· intro b _ hba
exact single_eq_of_ne (hf.ne hba)
· intro _
rw [single_zero, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
#align finsupp.map_domain_apply Finsupp.mapDomain_apply
theorem mapDomain_notin_range {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f x a = 0 := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero fun a' _ => single_eq_of_ne fun eq => h <| eq ▸ Set.mem_range_self _
#align finsupp.map_domain_notin_range Finsupp.mapDomain_notin_range
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_id : mapDomain id v = v :=
sum_single _
#align finsupp.map_domain_id Finsupp.mapDomain_id
theorem mapDomain_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
mapDomain (g ∘ f) v = mapDomain g (mapDomain f v) := by
refine ((sum_sum_index ?_ ?_).trans ?_).symm
· intro
exact single_zero _
· intro
exact single_add _
refine sum_congr fun _ _ => sum_single_index ?_
exact single_zero _
#align finsupp.map_domain_comp Finsupp.mapDomain_comp
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_single {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : M} : mapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b :=
sum_single_index <| single_zero _
#align finsupp.map_domain_single Finsupp.mapDomain_single
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_zero {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) :=
sum_zero_index
#align finsupp.map_domain_zero Finsupp.mapDomain_zero
theorem mapDomain_congr {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ x ∈ v.support, f x = g x) :
v.mapDomain f = v.mapDomain g :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ H => by simp only [h _ H]
#align finsupp.map_domain_congr Finsupp.mapDomain_congr
theorem mapDomain_add {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) = mapDomain f v₁ + mapDomain f v₂ :=
sum_add_index' (fun _ => single_zero _) fun _ => single_add _
#align finsupp.map_domain_add Finsupp.mapDomain_add
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_equiv_apply {f : α ≃ β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) :
mapDomain f x a = x (f.symm a) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← f.apply_symm_apply a]
exact mapDomain_apply f.injective _ _
#align finsupp.map_domain_equiv_apply Finsupp.mapDomain_equiv_apply
/-- `Finsupp.mapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α → β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun := mapDomain f
map_zero' := mapDomain_zero
map_add' _ _ := mapDomain_add
#align finsupp.map_domain.add_monoid_hom Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_id : mapDomain.addMonoidHom id = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_id
#align finsupp.map_domain.add_monoid_hom_id Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom_id
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f ∘ g) : (α →₀ M) →+ γ →₀ M) =
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom g) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_comp
#align finsupp.map_domain.add_monoid_hom_comp Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp
theorem mapDomain_finset_sum {f : α → β} {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (∑ i ∈ s, v i) = ∑ i ∈ s, mapDomain f (v i) :=
map_sum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) _ _
#align finsupp.map_domain_finset_sum Finsupp.mapDomain_finset_sum
theorem mapDomain_sum [Zero N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ N} {v : α → N → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
map_finsupp_sum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M) _ _
#align finsupp.map_domain_sum Finsupp.mapDomain_sum
theorem mapDomain_support [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} :
(s.mapDomain f).support ⊆ s.support.image f :=
Finset.Subset.trans support_sum <|
Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.biUnion_mono fun a _ => support_single_subset) <| by
rw [Finset.biUnion_singleton]
#align finsupp.map_domain_support Finsupp.mapDomain_support
theorem mapDomain_apply' (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (hS : (x.support : Set α) ⊆ S)
(hf : Set.InjOn f S) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ S) : mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
classical
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
simp_rw [single_apply]
by_cases hax : a ∈ x.support
· rw [← Finset.add_sum_erase _ _ hax, if_pos rfl]
convert add_zero (x a)
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact (hf.mono hS).ne (Finset.mem_of_mem_erase hi) hax (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hi)
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hax]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact hf.ne (hS hi) ha (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi hax)
#align finsupp.map_domain_apply' Finsupp.mapDomain_apply'
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (s : α →₀ M)
(hf : Set.InjOn f s.support) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm mapDomain_support <| by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Ne] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨hx_w, hx_h_left, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_support_iff, Ne]
rw [mapDomain_apply' (↑s.support : Set _) _ _ hf]
· exact hx_h_left
· simp only [mem_coe, mem_support_iff, Ne]
exact hx_h_left
· exact Subset.refl _
#align finsupp.map_domain_support_of_inj_on Finsupp.mapDomain_support_of_injOn
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injective [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(s : α →₀ M) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
mapDomain_support_of_injOn s hf.injOn
#align finsupp.map_domain_support_of_injective Finsupp.mapDomain_support_of_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(h_zero : ∀ b, h b 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀ b m₁ m₂, h b (m₁ + m₂) = h b m₁ * h b m₂) :
(mapDomain f s).prod h = s.prod fun a m => h (f a) m :=
(prod_sum_index h_zero h_add).trans <| prod_congr fun _ _ => prod_single_index (h_zero _)
#align finsupp.prod_map_domain_index Finsupp.prod_mapDomain_index
#align finsupp.sum_map_domain_index Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index
-- Note that in `prod_mapDomain_index`, `M` is still an additive monoid,
-- so there is no analogous version in terms of `MonoidHom`.
/-- A version of `sum_mapDomain_index` that takes a bundled `AddMonoidHom`,
rather than separate linearity hypotheses.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mapDomain_index_addMonoidHom [AddCommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M}
(h : β → M →+ N) : ((mapDomain f s).sum fun b m => h b m) = s.sum fun a m => h (f a) m :=
sum_mapDomain_index (fun b => (h b).map_zero) (fun b _ _ => (h b).map_add _ _)
#align finsupp.sum_map_domain_index_add_monoid_hom Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index_addMonoidHom
theorem embDomain_eq_mapDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : embDomain f v = mapDomain f v := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [mapDomain_apply f.injective, embDomain_apply]
· rw [mapDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range] <;> assumption
#align finsupp.emb_domain_eq_map_domain Finsupp.embDomain_eq_mapDomain
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index_inj [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (s.mapDomain f).prod h = s.prod fun a b => h (f a) b := by
rw [← Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk f hf, ← embDomain_eq_mapDomain, prod_embDomain]
#align finsupp.prod_map_domain_index_inj Finsupp.prod_mapDomain_index_inj
#align finsupp.sum_map_domain_index_inj Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index_inj
theorem mapDomain_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) := by
intro v₁ v₂ eq
ext a
have : mapDomain f v₁ (f a) = mapDomain f v₂ (f a) := by rw [eq]
rwa [mapDomain_apply hf, mapDomain_apply hf] at this
#align finsupp.map_domain_injective Finsupp.mapDomain_injective
/-- When `f` is an embedding we have an embedding `(α →₀ ℕ) ↪ (β →₀ ℕ)` given by `mapDomain`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomainEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ ℕ) ↪ β →₀ ℕ :=
⟨Finsupp.mapDomain f, Finsupp.mapDomain_injective f.injective⟩
#align finsupp.map_domain_embedding Finsupp.mapDomainEmbedding
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (g : M →+ N) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom g) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom g).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) := by
ext
simp only [AddMonoidHom.coe_comp, Finsupp.mapRange_single, Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom_apply,
Finsupp.singleAddHom_apply, eq_self_iff_true, Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.mapDomain_single,
Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom_apply]
#align finsupp.map_domain.add_monoid_hom_comp_map_range Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange
/-- When `g` preserves addition, `mapRange` and `mapDomain` commute. -/
theorem mapDomain_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) (g : M → N) (h0 : g 0 = 0)
(hadd : ∀ x y, g (x + y) = g x + g y) :
mapDomain f (mapRange g h0 v) = mapRange g h0 (mapDomain f v) :=
let g' : M →+ N :=
{ toFun := g
map_zero' := h0
map_add' := hadd }
DFunLike.congr_fun (mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange f g') v
#align finsupp.map_domain_map_range Finsupp.mapDomain_mapRange
theorem sum_update_add [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] (f : ι →₀ α) (i : ι) (a : α)
(g : ι → α → β) (hg : ∀ i, g i 0 = 0)
(hgg : ∀ (j : ι) (a₁ a₂ : α), g j (a₁ + a₂) = g j a₁ + g j a₂) :
(f.update i a).sum g + g i (f i) = f.sum g + g i a := by
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg]
conv_rhs => rw [← Finsupp.update_self f i]
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg, add_assoc, add_assoc]
congr 1
rw [add_comm, sum_single_index (hg _), sum_single_index (hg _)]
#align finsupp.sum_update_add Finsupp.sum_update_add
theorem mapDomain_injOn (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (hf : Set.InjOn f S) :
Set.InjOn (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) { w | (w.support : Set α) ⊆ S } := by
intro v₁ hv₁ v₂ hv₂ eq
ext a
classical
by_cases h : a ∈ v₁.support ∪ v₂.support
· rw [← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₁ hf _, ← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₂ hf _, eq] <;>
· apply Set.union_subset hv₁ hv₂
exact mod_cast h
· simp only [not_or, mem_union, not_not, mem_support_iff] at h
simp [h]
#align finsupp.map_domain_inj_on Finsupp.mapDomain_injOn
theorem equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain {M} [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain f l = mapDomain f l := by ext x; simp [mapDomain_equiv_apply]
#align finsupp.equiv_map_domain_eq_map_domain Finsupp.equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain
end MapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `comapDomain` -/
section ComapDomain
/-- Given `f : α → β`, `l : β →₀ M` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective on
the preimage of `l.support`, `comapDomain f l hf` is the finitely supported function
from `α` to `M` given by composing `l` with `f`. -/
@[simps support]
def comapDomain [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support)) :
α →₀ M where
support := l.support.preimage f hf
toFun a := l (f a)
mem_support_toFun := by
intro a
simp only [Finset.mem_def.symm, Finset.mem_preimage]
exact l.mem_support_toFun (f a)
#align finsupp.comap_domain Finsupp.comapDomain
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_apply [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support))
(a : α) : comapDomain f l hf a = l (f a) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.comap_domain_apply Finsupp.comapDomain_apply
theorem sum_comapDomain [Zero M] [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (g : β → M → N)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) :
(comapDomain f l hf.injOn).sum (g ∘ f) = l.sum g := by
simp only [sum, comapDomain_apply, (· ∘ ·), comapDomain]
exact Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij f _ hf fun x => g x (l x)
#align finsupp.sum_comap_domain Finsupp.sum_comapDomain
theorem eq_zero_of_comapDomain_eq_zero [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) : comapDomain f l hf.injOn = 0 → l = 0 := by
rw [← support_eq_empty, ← support_eq_empty, comapDomain]
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false_iff, mem_preimage]
intro h a ha
cases' hf.2.2 ha with b hb
exact h b (hb.2.symm ▸ ha)
#align finsupp.eq_zero_of_comap_domain_eq_zero Finsupp.eq_zero_of_comapDomain_eq_zero
section FInjective
section Zero
variable [Zero M]
lemma embDomain_comapDomain {f : α ↪ β} {g : β →₀ M} (hg : ↑g.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
embDomain f (comapDomain f g f.injective.injOn) = g := by
ext b
by_cases hb : b ∈ Set.range f
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hb
rw [embDomain_apply, comapDomain_apply]
· replace hg : g b = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.mp <| mt (hg ·) hb
rw [embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ hb, hg]
/-- Note the `hif` argument is needed for this to work in `rw`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_zero (f : α → β)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(0 : β →₀ M).support) := Finset.coe_empty ▸ (Set.injOn_empty f)) :
comapDomain f (0 : β →₀ M) hif = (0 : α →₀ M) := by
ext
rfl
#align finsupp.comap_domain_zero Finsupp.comapDomain_zero
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_single (f : α → β) (a : α) (m : M)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' (single (f a) m).support)) :
comapDomain f (Finsupp.single (f a) m) hif = Finsupp.single a m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp only [single_zero, comapDomain_zero]
· rw [eq_single_iff, comapDomain_apply, comapDomain_support, ← Finset.coe_subset, coe_preimage,
support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton, coe_singleton, single_eq_same]
rw [support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton] at hif
exact ⟨fun x hx => hif hx rfl hx, rfl⟩
#align finsupp.comap_domain_single Finsupp.comapDomain_single
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M] {f : α → β}
theorem comapDomain_add (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) (hv₁ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₁.support))
(hv₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₂.support)) (hv₁₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(v₁ + v₂).support)) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hv₁₂ = comapDomain f v₁ hv₁ + comapDomain f v₂ hv₂ := by
ext
simp only [comapDomain_apply, coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
#align finsupp.comap_domain_add Finsupp.comapDomain_add
/-- A version of `Finsupp.comapDomain_add` that's easier to use. -/
theorem comapDomain_add_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hf.injOn =
comapDomain f v₁ hf.injOn + comapDomain f v₂ hf.injOn :=
comapDomain_add _ _ _ _ _
#align finsupp.comap_domain_add_of_injective Finsupp.comapDomain_add_of_injective
/-- `Finsupp.comapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def comapDomain.addMonoidHom (hf : Function.Injective f) : (β →₀ M) →+ α →₀ M where
toFun x := comapDomain f x hf.injOn
map_zero' := comapDomain_zero f
map_add' := comapDomain_add_of_injective hf
#align finsupp.comap_domain.add_monoid_hom Finsupp.comapDomain.addMonoidHom
end AddZeroClass
variable [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → β)
theorem mapDomain_comapDomain (hf : Function.Injective f) (l : β →₀ M)
(hl : ↑l.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f (comapDomain f l hf.injOn) = l := by
conv_rhs => rw [← embDomain_comapDomain (f := ⟨f, hf⟩) hl (M := M), embDomain_eq_mapDomain]
rfl
#align finsupp.map_domain_comap_domain Finsupp.mapDomain_comapDomain
end FInjective
end ComapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about finitely supported functions whose support is an `Option` type -/
section Option
/-- Restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported function on `α`. -/
def some [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) : α →₀ M :=
f.comapDomain Option.some fun _ => by simp
#align finsupp.some Finsupp.some
@[simp]
theorem some_apply [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) (a : α) : f.some a = f (Option.some a) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.some_apply Finsupp.some_apply
@[simp]
theorem some_zero [Zero M] : (0 : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align finsupp.some_zero Finsupp.some_zero
@[simp]
theorem some_add [AddCommMonoid M] (f g : Option α →₀ M) : (f + g).some = f.some + g.some := by
ext
simp
#align finsupp.some_add Finsupp.some_add
@[simp]
theorem some_single_none [Zero M] (m : M) : (single none m : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align finsupp.some_single_none Finsupp.some_single_none
@[simp]
theorem some_single_some [Zero M] (a : α) (m : M) :
(single (Option.some a) m : Option α →₀ M).some = single a m := by
classical
ext b
simp [single_apply]
#align finsupp.some_single_some Finsupp.some_single_some
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_option_index [AddCommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N] (f : Option α →₀ M)
(b : Option α → M → N) (h_zero : ∀ o, b o 0 = 1)
(h_add : ∀ o m₁ m₂, b o (m₁ + m₂) = b o m₁ * b o m₂) :
f.prod b = b none (f none) * f.some.prod fun a => b (Option.some a) := by
classical
apply induction_linear f
· simp [some_zero, h_zero]
· intro f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂
rw [Finsupp.prod_add_index, h₁, h₂, some_add, Finsupp.prod_add_index]
· simp only [h_add, Pi.add_apply, Finsupp.coe_add]
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
all_goals simp [h_zero, h_add]
· rintro (_ | a) m <;> simp [h_zero, h_add]
#align finsupp.prod_option_index Finsupp.prod_option_index
#align finsupp.sum_option_index Finsupp.sum_option_index
theorem sum_option_index_smul [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (f : Option α →₀ R)
(b : Option α → M) :
(f.sum fun o r => r • b o) = f none • b none + f.some.sum fun a r => r • b (Option.some a) :=
f.sum_option_index _ (fun _ => zero_smul _ _) fun _ _ _ => add_smul _ _ _
#align finsupp.sum_option_index_smul Finsupp.sum_option_index_smul
end Option
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.filter` -/
section Filter
section Zero
variable [Zero M] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M)
/--
`Finsupp.filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true and `0`
otherwise. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M) : α →₀ M where
toFun a := if p a then f a else 0
support := f.support.filter p
mem_support_toFun a := by
beta_reduce -- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed to activate `split_ifs`
split_ifs with h <;>
· simp only [h, mem_filter, mem_support_iff]
tauto
#align finsupp.filter Finsupp.filter
theorem filter_apply (a : α) : f.filter p a = if p a then f a else 0 := rfl
#align finsupp.filter_apply Finsupp.filter_apply
theorem filter_eq_indicator : ⇑(f.filter p) = Set.indicator { x | p x } f := by
ext
simp [filter_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
#align finsupp.filter_eq_indicator Finsupp.filter_eq_indicator
theorem filter_eq_zero_iff : f.filter p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 := by
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align finsupp.filter_eq_zero_iff Finsupp.filter_eq_zero_iff
theorem filter_eq_self_iff : f.filter p = f ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 → p x := by
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, Set.indicator_apply_eq_self, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
not_imp_comm]
#align finsupp.filter_eq_self_iff Finsupp.filter_eq_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply_pos {a : α} (h : p a) : f.filter p a = f a := if_pos h
#align finsupp.filter_apply_pos Finsupp.filter_apply_pos
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply_neg {a : α} (h : ¬p a) : f.filter p a = 0 := if_neg h
#align finsupp.filter_apply_neg Finsupp.filter_apply_neg
@[simp]
theorem support_filter : (f.filter p).support = f.support.filter p := rfl
#align finsupp.support_filter Finsupp.support_filter
theorem filter_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).filter p = 0 := by
classical rw [← support_eq_empty, support_filter, support_zero, Finset.filter_empty]
#align finsupp.filter_zero Finsupp.filter_zero
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_of_pos {a : α} {b : M} (h : p a) : (single a b).filter p = single a b :=
(filter_eq_self_iff _ _).2 fun _ hx => (single_apply_ne_zero.1 hx).1.symm ▸ h
#align finsupp.filter_single_of_pos Finsupp.filter_single_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_of_neg {a : α} {b : M} (h : ¬p a) : (single a b).filter p = 0 :=
(filter_eq_zero_iff _ _).2 fun _ hpx =>
single_apply_eq_zero.2 fun hxa => absurd hpx (hxa.symm ▸ h)
#align finsupp.filter_single_of_neg Finsupp.filter_single_of_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_index [CommMonoid N] (g : α → M → N) :
(f.filter p).prod g = ∏ x ∈ (f.filter p).support, g x (f x) := by
classical
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [support_filter, Finset.mem_filter] at hx
rw [filter_apply_pos _ _ hx.2]
#align finsupp.prod_filter_index Finsupp.prod_filter_index
#align finsupp.sum_filter_index Finsupp.sum_filter_index
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not [CommMonoid N] (g : α → M → N) :
(f.filter p).prod g * (f.filter fun a => ¬p a).prod g = f.prod g := by
classical simp_rw [prod_filter_index, support_filter, Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not,
Finsupp.prod]
#align finsupp.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not Finsupp.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
#align finsupp.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not Finsupp.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_div_prod_filter [CommGroup G] (g : α → M → G) :
f.prod g / (f.filter p).prod g = (f.filter fun a => ¬p a).prod g :=
div_eq_of_eq_mul' (prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not _ _ _).symm
#align finsupp.prod_div_prod_filter Finsupp.prod_div_prod_filter
#align finsupp.sum_sub_sum_filter Finsupp.sum_sub_sum_filter
end Zero
theorem filter_pos_add_filter_neg [AddZeroClass M] (f : α →₀ M) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(f.filter p + f.filter fun a => ¬p a) = f :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [coe_add, filter_eq_indicator]
exact Set.indicator_self_add_compl { x | p x } f
#align finsupp.filter_pos_add_filter_neg Finsupp.filter_pos_add_filter_neg
end Filter
/-! ### Declarations about `frange` -/
section Frange
variable [Zero M]
/-- `frange f` is the image of `f` on the support of `f`. -/
def frange (f : α →₀ M) : Finset M :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
Finset.image f f.support
#align finsupp.frange Finsupp.frange
theorem mem_frange {f : α →₀ M} {y : M} : y ∈ f.frange ↔ y ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ x, f x = y := by
rw [frange, @Finset.mem_image _ _ (Classical.decEq _) _ f.support]
exact ⟨fun ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩ => ⟨hx2 ▸ mem_support_iff.1 hx1, x, hx2⟩, fun ⟨hy, x, hx⟩ =>
⟨x, mem_support_iff.2 (hx.symm ▸ hy), hx⟩⟩
-- Porting note: maybe there is a better way to fix this, but (1) it wasn't seeing past `frange`
-- the definition, and (2) it needed the `Classical.decEq` instance again.
#align finsupp.mem_frange Finsupp.mem_frange
theorem zero_not_mem_frange {f : α →₀ M} : (0 : M) ∉ f.frange := fun H => (mem_frange.1 H).1 rfl
#align finsupp.zero_not_mem_frange Finsupp.zero_not_mem_frange
theorem frange_single {x : α} {y : M} : frange (single x y) ⊆ {y} := fun r hr =>
let ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := mem_frange.1 hr
ht2 ▸ by
classical
rw [single_apply] at ht2 ⊢
split_ifs at ht2 ⊢
· exact Finset.mem_singleton_self _
· exact (t ht2.symm).elim
#align finsupp.frange_single Finsupp.frange_single
end Frange
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.subtypeDomain` -/
section SubtypeDomain
section Zero
variable [Zero M] {p : α → Prop}
/--
`subtypeDomain p f` is the restriction of the finitely supported function `f` to subtype `p`. -/
def subtypeDomain (p : α → Prop) (f : α →₀ M) : Subtype p →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decPred p
f.support.subtype p
toFun := f ∘ Subtype.val
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [@mem_subtype _ _ (Classical.decPred p), mem_support_iff]; rfl
#align finsupp.subtype_domain Finsupp.subtypeDomain
@[simp]
theorem support_subtypeDomain [D : DecidablePred p] {f : α →₀ M} :
(subtypeDomain p f).support = f.support.subtype p := by rw [Subsingleton.elim D] <;> rfl
#align finsupp.support_subtype_domain Finsupp.support_subtypeDomain
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_apply {a : Subtype p} {v : α →₀ M} : (subtypeDomain p v) a = v a.val :=
rfl
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_apply Finsupp.subtypeDomain_apply
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_zero : subtypeDomain p (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_zero Finsupp.subtypeDomain_zero
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff' {f : α →₀ M} : f.subtypeDomain p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 := by
classical simp_rw [← support_eq_empty, support_subtypeDomain, subtype_eq_empty,
not_mem_support_iff]
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_eq_zero_iff' Finsupp.subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff'
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff {f : α →₀ M} (hf : ∀ x ∈ f.support, p x) :
f.subtypeDomain p = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff'.trans
⟨fun H =>
ext fun x => by
classical exact if hx : p x then H x hx else not_mem_support_iff.1 <| mt (hf x) hx,
fun H x _ => by simp [H]⟩
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_eq_zero_iff Finsupp.subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtypeDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {v : α →₀ M} {h : α → M → N}
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.support, p x) : (v.subtypeDomain p).prod (fun a b ↦ h a b) = v.prod h := by
refine Finset.prod_bij (fun p _ ↦ p) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finsupp.prod_subtype_domain_index Finsupp.prod_subtypeDomain_index
#align finsupp.sum_subtype_domain_index Finsupp.sum_subtypeDomain_index
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M] {p : α → Prop} {v v' : α →₀ M}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_add {v v' : α →₀ M} :
(v + v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p + v'.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_add Finsupp.subtypeDomain_add
/-- `subtypeDomain` but as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ M) →+ Subtype p →₀ M where
toFun := subtypeDomain p
map_zero' := subtypeDomain_zero
map_add' _ _ := subtypeDomain_add
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_add_monoid_hom Finsupp.subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom
/-- `Finsupp.filter` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def filterAddHom (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]: (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ M where
toFun := filter p
map_zero' := filter_zero p
map_add' f g := DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [filter_eq_indicator, coe_add]
exact Set.indicator_add { x | p x } f g
#align finsupp.filter_add_hom Finsupp.filterAddHom
@[simp]
theorem filter_add [DecidablePred p] {v v' : α →₀ M} :
(v + v').filter p = v.filter p + v'.filter p :=
(filterAddHom p).map_add v v'
#align finsupp.filter_add Finsupp.filter_add
end AddZeroClass
section CommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid M] {p : α → Prop}
theorem subtypeDomain_sum {s : Finset ι} {h : ι → α →₀ M} :
(∑ c ∈ s, h c).subtypeDomain p = ∑ c ∈ s, (h c).subtypeDomain p :=
map_sum subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom _ s
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_sum Finsupp.subtypeDomain_sum
theorem subtypeDomain_finsupp_sum [Zero N] {s : β →₀ N} {h : β → N → α →₀ M} :
(s.sum h).subtypeDomain p = s.sum fun c d => (h c d).subtypeDomain p :=
subtypeDomain_sum
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_finsupp_sum Finsupp.subtypeDomain_finsupp_sum
theorem filter_sum [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α →₀ M) :
(∑ a ∈ s, f a).filter p = ∑ a ∈ s, filter p (f a) :=
map_sum (filterAddHom p) f s
#align finsupp.filter_sum Finsupp.filter_sum
theorem filter_eq_sum (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M) :
f.filter p = ∑ i ∈ f.support.filter p, single i (f i) :=
(f.filter p).sum_single.symm.trans <|
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => by
rw [filter_apply_pos _ _ (mem_filter.1 hx).2]
#align finsupp.filter_eq_sum Finsupp.filter_eq_sum
end CommMonoid
section Group
variable [AddGroup G] {p : α → Prop} {v v' : α →₀ G}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_neg : (-v).subtypeDomain p = -v.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_neg Finsupp.subtypeDomain_neg
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_sub : (v - v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p - v'.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.subtype_domain_sub Finsupp.subtypeDomain_sub
@[simp]
theorem single_neg (a : α) (b : G) : single a (-b) = -single a b :=
(singleAddHom a : G →+ _).map_neg b
#align finsupp.single_neg Finsupp.single_neg
@[simp]
theorem single_sub (a : α) (b₁ b₂ : G) : single a (b₁ - b₂) = single a b₁ - single a b₂ :=
(singleAddHom a : G →+ _).map_sub b₁ b₂
#align finsupp.single_sub Finsupp.single_sub
@[simp]
theorem erase_neg (a : α) (f : α →₀ G) : erase a (-f) = -erase a f :=
(eraseAddHom a : (_ →₀ G) →+ _).map_neg f
#align finsupp.erase_neg Finsupp.erase_neg
@[simp]
theorem erase_sub (a : α) (f₁ f₂ : α →₀ G) : erase a (f₁ - f₂) = erase a f₁ - erase a f₂ :=
(eraseAddHom a : (_ →₀ G) →+ _).map_sub f₁ f₂
#align finsupp.erase_sub Finsupp.erase_sub
@[simp]
theorem filter_neg (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ G) : filter p (-f) = -filter p f :=
(filterAddHom p : (_ →₀ G) →+ _).map_neg f
#align finsupp.filter_neg Finsupp.filter_neg
@[simp]
theorem filter_sub (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f₁ f₂ : α →₀ G) :
filter p (f₁ - f₂) = filter p f₁ - filter p f₂ :=
(filterAddHom p : (_ →₀ G) →+ _).map_sub f₁ f₂
#align finsupp.filter_sub Finsupp.filter_sub
end Group
end SubtypeDomain
theorem mem_support_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid M] {s : Multiset (α →₀ M)} (a : α) :
a ∈ s.sum.support → ∃ f ∈ s, a ∈ (f : α →₀ M).support :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun h => False.elim (by simp at h))
(by
intro f s ih ha
by_cases h : a ∈ f.support
· exact ⟨f, Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
· simp only [Multiset.sum_cons, mem_support_iff, add_apply, not_mem_support_iff.1 h,
zero_add] at ha
rcases ih (mem_support_iff.2 ha) with ⟨f', h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨f', Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem h₀, h₁⟩)
#align finsupp.mem_support_multiset_sum Finsupp.mem_support_multiset_sum
theorem mem_support_finset_sum [AddCommMonoid M] {s : Finset ι} {h : ι → α →₀ M} (a : α)
(ha : a ∈ (∑ c ∈ s, h c).support) : ∃ c ∈ s, a ∈ (h c).support :=
let ⟨_, hf, hfa⟩ := mem_support_multiset_sum a ha
let ⟨c, hc, Eq⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.1 hf
⟨c, hc, Eq.symm ▸ hfa⟩
#align finsupp.mem_support_finset_sum Finsupp.mem_support_finset_sum
/-! ### Declarations about `curry` and `uncurry` -/
section CurryUncurry
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N]
/-- Given a finitely supported function `f` from a product type `α × β` to `γ`,
`curry f` is the "curried" finitely supported function from `α` to the type of
finitely supported functions from `β` to `γ`. -/
protected def curry (f : α × β →₀ M) : α →₀ β →₀ M :=
f.sum fun p c => single p.1 (single p.2 c)
#align finsupp.curry Finsupp.curry
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (f : α × β →₀ M) (x : α) (y : β) : f.curry x y = f (x, y) := by
classical
have : ∀ b : α × β, single b.fst (single b.snd (f b)) x y = if b = (x, y) then f b else 0 := by
rintro ⟨b₁, b₂⟩
simp only [ne_eq, single_apply, Prod.ext_iff, ite_and]
split_ifs <;> simp [single_apply, *]
rw [Finsupp.curry, sum_apply, sum_apply, sum_eq_single, this, if_pos rfl]
· intro b _ b_ne
rw [this b, if_neg b_ne]
· intro _
rw [single_zero, single_zero, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
#align finsupp.curry_apply Finsupp.curry_apply
theorem sum_curry_index (f : α × β →₀ M) (g : α → β → M → N) (hg₀ : ∀ a b, g a b 0 = 0)
(hg₁ : ∀ a b c₀ c₁, g a b (c₀ + c₁) = g a b c₀ + g a b c₁) :
(f.curry.sum fun a f => f.sum (g a)) = f.sum fun p c => g p.1 p.2 c := by
rw [Finsupp.curry]
trans
· exact
sum_sum_index (fun a => sum_zero_index) fun a b₀ b₁ =>
sum_add_index' (fun a => hg₀ _ _) fun c d₀ d₁ => hg₁ _ _ _ _
congr; funext p c
trans
· exact sum_single_index sum_zero_index
exact sum_single_index (hg₀ _ _)
#align finsupp.sum_curry_index Finsupp.sum_curry_index
/-- Given a finitely supported function `f` from `α` to the type of
finitely supported functions from `β` to `M`,
`uncurry f` is the "uncurried" finitely supported function from `α × β` to `M`. -/
protected def uncurry (f : α →₀ β →₀ M) : α × β →₀ M :=
f.sum fun a g => g.sum fun b c => single (a, b) c
#align finsupp.uncurry Finsupp.uncurry
/-- `finsuppProdEquiv` defines the `Equiv` between `((α × β) →₀ M)` and `(α →₀ (β →₀ M))` given by
currying and uncurrying. -/
def finsuppProdEquiv : (α × β →₀ M) ≃ (α →₀ β →₀ M) where
toFun := Finsupp.curry
invFun := Finsupp.uncurry
left_inv f := by
rw [Finsupp.uncurry, sum_curry_index]
· simp_rw [Prod.mk.eta, sum_single]
· intros
apply single_zero
· intros
apply single_add
right_inv f := by
simp only [Finsupp.curry, Finsupp.uncurry, sum_sum_index, sum_zero_index, sum_add_index,
sum_single_index, single_zero, single_add, eq_self_iff_true, forall_true_iff,
forall₃_true_iff, (single_sum _ _ _).symm, sum_single]
#align finsupp.finsupp_prod_equiv Finsupp.finsuppProdEquiv
theorem filter_curry (f : α × β →₀ M) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(f.filter fun a : α × β => p a.1).curry = f.curry.filter p := by
classical
rw [Finsupp.curry, Finsupp.curry, Finsupp.sum, Finsupp.sum, filter_sum, support_filter,
sum_filter]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl ?_
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ _
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_apply_pos, filter_single_of_pos] <;> exact h
· rwa [filter_single_of_neg]
#align finsupp.filter_curry Finsupp.filter_curry
theorem support_curry [DecidableEq α] (f : α × β →₀ M) :
f.curry.support ⊆ f.support.image Prod.fst := by
rw [← Finset.biUnion_singleton]
refine Finset.Subset.trans support_sum ?_
exact Finset.biUnion_mono fun a _ => support_single_subset
#align finsupp.support_curry Finsupp.support_curry
end CurryUncurry
/-! ### Declarations about finitely supported functions whose support is a `Sum` type -/
section Sum
/-- `Finsupp.sumElim f g` maps `inl x` to `f x` and `inr y` to `g y`. -/
def sumElim {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) : Sum α β →₀ γ :=
onFinset
(by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
haveI := Classical.decEq β
exact f.support.map ⟨_, Sum.inl_injective⟩ ∪ g.support.map ⟨_, Sum.inr_injective⟩)
(Sum.elim f g) fun ab h => by
cases' ab with a b <;>
letI := Classical.decEq α <;> letI := Classical.decEq β <;>
-- porting note (#10754): had to add these `DecidableEq` instances
simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr] at h <;>
simpa
#align finsupp.sum_elim Finsupp.sumElim
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sumElim {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) :
⇑(sumElim f g) = Sum.elim f g :=
rfl
#align finsupp.coe_sum_elim Finsupp.coe_sumElim
theorem sumElim_apply {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) (x : Sum α β) :
sumElim f g x = Sum.elim f g x :=
rfl
#align finsupp.sum_elim_apply Finsupp.sumElim_apply
theorem sumElim_inl {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) (x : α) :
sumElim f g (Sum.inl x) = f x :=
rfl
#align finsupp.sum_elim_inl Finsupp.sumElim_inl
theorem sumElim_inr {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) (x : β) :
sumElim f g (Sum.inr x) = g x :=
rfl
#align finsupp.sum_elim_inr Finsupp.sumElim_inr
/-- The equivalence between `(α ⊕ β) →₀ γ` and `(α →₀ γ) × (β →₀ γ)`.
This is the `Finsupp` version of `Equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] : (Sum α β →₀ γ) ≃ (α →₀ γ) × (β →₀ γ) where
toFun f :=
⟨f.comapDomain Sum.inl Sum.inl_injective.injOn,
f.comapDomain Sum.inr Sum.inr_injective.injOn⟩
invFun fg := sumElim fg.1 fg.2
left_inv f := by
ext ab
cases' ab with a b <;> simp
right_inv fg := by ext <;> simp
#align finsupp.sum_finsupp_equiv_prod_finsupp Finsupp.sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp
theorem fst_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : Sum α β →₀ γ) (x : α) :
(sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp f).1 x = f (Sum.inl x) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.fst_sum_finsupp_equiv_prod_finsupp Finsupp.fst_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp
theorem snd_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : Sum α β →₀ γ) (y : β) :
(sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp f).2 y = f (Sum.inr y) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.snd_sum_finsupp_equiv_prod_finsupp Finsupp.snd_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp
theorem sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inl {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (fg : (α →₀ γ) × (β →₀ γ))
(x : α) : (sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp.symm fg) (Sum.inl x) = fg.1 x :=
rfl
#align finsupp.sum_finsupp_equiv_prod_finsupp_symm_inl Finsupp.sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inl
theorem sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inr {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (fg : (α →₀ γ) × (β →₀ γ))
(y : β) : (sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp.symm fg) (Sum.inr y) = fg.2 y :=
rfl
#align finsupp.sum_finsupp_equiv_prod_finsupp_symm_inr Finsupp.sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inr
variable [AddMonoid M]
/-- The additive equivalence between `(α ⊕ β) →₀ M` and `(α →₀ M) × (β →₀ M)`.
This is the `Finsupp` version of `Equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow`. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp {α β : Type*} : (Sum α β →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ M) × (β →₀ M) :=
{ sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp with
map_add' := by
intros
ext <;>
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Prod.fst_add, Prod.snd_add, add_apply,
snd_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp, fst_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp] }
#align finsupp.sum_finsupp_add_equiv_prod_finsupp Finsupp.sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp
theorem fst_sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp {α β : Type*} (f : Sum α β →₀ M) (x : α) :
(sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp f).1 x = f (Sum.inl x) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.fst_sum_finsupp_add_equiv_prod_finsupp Finsupp.fst_sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp
theorem snd_sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp {α β : Type*} (f : Sum α β →₀ M) (y : β) :
(sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp f).2 y = f (Sum.inr y) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.snd_sum_finsupp_add_equiv_prod_finsupp Finsupp.snd_sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp
theorem sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inl {α β : Type*} (fg : (α →₀ M) × (β →₀ M)) (x : α) :
(sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp.symm fg) (Sum.inl x) = fg.1 x :=
rfl
#align finsupp.sum_finsupp_add_equiv_prod_finsupp_symm_inl Finsupp.sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inl
theorem sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inr {α β : Type*} (fg : (α →₀ M) × (β →₀ M)) (y : β) :
(sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp.symm fg) (Sum.inr y) = fg.2 y :=
rfl
#align finsupp.sum_finsupp_add_equiv_prod_finsupp_symm_inr Finsupp.sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inr
end Sum
/-! ### Declarations about scalar multiplication -/
section
variable [Zero M] [MonoidWithZero R] [MulActionWithZero R M]
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- `simpNF` incorrectly complains the LHS doesn't simplify.
theorem single_smul (a b : α) (f : α → M) (r : R) : single a r b • f a = single a (r • f b) b := by
by_cases h : a = b <;> simp [h]
#align finsupp.single_smul Finsupp.single_smul
end
section
variable [Monoid G] [MulAction G α] [AddCommMonoid M]
/-- Scalar multiplication acting on the domain.
This is not an instance as it would conflict with the action on the range.
See the `instance_diamonds` test for examples of such conflicts. -/
def comapSMul : SMul G (α →₀ M) where smul g := mapDomain (g • ·)
#align finsupp.comap_has_smul Finsupp.comapSMul
attribute [local instance] comapSMul
theorem comapSMul_def (g : G) (f : α →₀ M) : g • f = mapDomain (g • ·) f :=
rfl
#align finsupp.comap_smul_def Finsupp.comapSMul_def
@[simp]
theorem comapSMul_single (g : G) (a : α) (b : M) : g • single a b = single (g • a) b :=
mapDomain_single
#align finsupp.comap_smul_single Finsupp.comapSMul_single
/-- `Finsupp.comapSMul` is multiplicative -/
def comapMulAction : MulAction G (α →₀ M) where
one_smul f := by rw [comapSMul_def, one_smul_eq_id, mapDomain_id]
mul_smul g g' f := by
rw [comapSMul_def, comapSMul_def, comapSMul_def, ← comp_smul_left, mapDomain_comp]
#align finsupp.comap_mul_action Finsupp.comapMulAction
attribute [local instance] comapMulAction
/-- `Finsupp.comapSMul` is distributive -/
def comapDistribMulAction : DistribMulAction G (α →₀ M) where
smul_zero g := by
ext a
simp only [comapSMul_def]
simp
smul_add g f f' := by
ext
simp only [comapSMul_def]
simp [mapDomain_add]
#align finsupp.comap_distrib_mul_action Finsupp.comapDistribMulAction
end
section
variable [Group G] [MulAction G α] [AddCommMonoid M]
attribute [local instance] comapSMul comapMulAction comapDistribMulAction
/-- When `G` is a group, `Finsupp.comapSMul` acts by precomposition with the action of `g⁻¹`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem comapSMul_apply (g : G) (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g • f) a = f (g⁻¹ • a) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← smul_inv_smul g a]
exact mapDomain_apply (MulAction.injective g) _ (g⁻¹ • a)
#align finsupp.comap_smul_apply Finsupp.comapSMul_apply
end
section
instance smulZeroClass [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] : SMulZeroClass R (α →₀ M) where
smul a v := v.mapRange (a • ·) (smul_zero _)
smul_zero a := by
ext
apply smul_zero
#align finsupp.smul_zero_class Finsupp.smulZeroClass
/-!
Throughout this section, some `Monoid` and `Semiring` arguments are specified with `{}` instead of
`[]`. See note [implicit instance arguments].
-/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] (b : R) (v : α →₀ M) : ⇑(b • v) = b • ⇑v :=
rfl
#align finsupp.coe_smul Finsupp.coe_smul
theorem smul_apply [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] (b : R) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) :
(b • v) a = b • v a :=
rfl
#align finsupp.smul_apply Finsupp.smul_apply
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.finsupp [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] {k : R}
(hk : IsSMulRegular M k) : IsSMulRegular (α →₀ M) k :=
fun _ _ h => ext fun i => hk (DFunLike.congr_fun h i)
#align is_smul_regular.finsupp IsSMulRegular.finsupp
instance faithfulSMul [Nonempty α] [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] [FaithfulSMul R M] :
FaithfulSMul R (α →₀ M) where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul h :=
let ⟨a⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun m : M => by simpa using DFunLike.congr_fun (h (single a m)) a
#align finsupp.faithful_smul Finsupp.faithfulSMul
instance instSMulWithZero [Zero R] [Zero M] [SMulWithZero R M] : SMulWithZero R (α →₀ M) where
zero_smul f := by ext i; exact zero_smul _ _
variable (α M)
instance distribSMul [AddZeroClass M] [DistribSMul R M] : DistribSMul R (α →₀ M) where
smul := (· • ·)
smul_add _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_add _ _ _
smul_zero _ := ext fun _ => smul_zero _
#align finsupp.distrib_smul Finsupp.distribSMul
instance distribMulAction [Monoid R] [AddMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] :
DistribMulAction R (α →₀ M) :=
{ Finsupp.distribSMul _ _ with
one_smul := fun x => ext fun y => one_smul R (x y)
mul_smul := fun r s x => ext fun y => mul_smul r s (x y) }
#align finsupp.distrib_mul_action Finsupp.distribMulAction
instance isScalarTower [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] [SMulZeroClass S M] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S M] : IsScalarTower R S (α →₀ M) where
smul_assoc _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_assoc _ _ _
instance smulCommClass [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] [SMulZeroClass S M] [SMulCommClass R S M] :
SMulCommClass R S (α →₀ M) where
smul_comm _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_comm _ _ _
#align finsupp.smul_comm_class Finsupp.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsCentralScalar R M] :
IsCentralScalar R (α →₀ M) where
op_smul_eq_smul _ _ := ext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _
#align finsupp.is_central_scalar Finsupp.isCentralScalar
instance module [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] : Module R (α →₀ M) :=
{ toDistribMulAction := Finsupp.distribMulAction α M
zero_smul := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_smul _ _
add_smul := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_smul _ _ _ }
#align finsupp.module Finsupp.module
variable {α M}
theorem support_smul [AddMonoid M] [SMulZeroClass R M] {b : R} {g : α →₀ M} :
(b • g).support ⊆ g.support := fun a => by
simp only [smul_apply, mem_support_iff, Ne]
exact mt fun h => h.symm ▸ smul_zero _
#align finsupp.support_smul Finsupp.support_smul
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] {b : R}
(hb : b ≠ 0) {g : α →₀ M} : (b • g).support = g.support :=
Finset.ext fun a => by simp [Finsupp.smul_apply, hb]
#align finsupp.support_smul_eq Finsupp.support_smul_eq
section
variable {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
@[simp]
theorem filter_smul {_ : Monoid R} [AddMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] {b : R} {v : α →₀ M} :
(b • v).filter p = b • v.filter p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [filter_eq_indicator, coe_smul]
exact Set.indicator_const_smul { x | p x } b v
#align finsupp.filter_smul Finsupp.filter_smul
end
theorem mapDomain_smul {_ : Monoid R} [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] {f : α → β} (b : R)
(v : α →₀ M) : mapDomain f (b • v) = b • mapDomain f v :=
mapDomain_mapRange _ _ _ _ (smul_add b)
#align finsupp.map_domain_smul Finsupp.mapDomain_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_single [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M] (c : R) (a : α) (b : M) :
c • Finsupp.single a b = Finsupp.single a (c • b) :=
mapRange_single
#align finsupp.smul_single Finsupp.smul_single
-- Porting note: removed `simp` because `simpNF` can prove it.
theorem smul_single' {_ : Semiring R} (c : R) (a : α) (b : R) :
c • Finsupp.single a b = Finsupp.single a (c * b) :=
smul_single _ _ _
#align finsupp.smul_single' Finsupp.smul_single'
theorem mapRange_smul {_ : Monoid R} [AddMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] [AddMonoid N]
[DistribMulAction R N] {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} (c : R) (v : α →₀ M)
(hsmul : ∀ x, f (c • x) = c • f x) : mapRange f hf (c • v) = c • mapRange f hf v := by
erw [← mapRange_comp]
· have : f ∘ (c • ·) = (c • ·) ∘ f := funext hsmul
simp_rw [this]
apply mapRange_comp
simp only [Function.comp_apply, smul_zero, hf]
#align finsupp.map_range_smul Finsupp.mapRange_smul
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean | 1,594 | 1,595 | theorem smul_single_one [Semiring R] (a : α) (b : R) : b • single a (1 : R) = single a b := by |
rw [smul_single, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Set
#align_import data.set.intervals.order_iso from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d012cd09a9b256d870751284dd6a29882b0be105"
/-!
# Lemmas about images of intervals under order isomorphisms.
-/
open Set
namespace OrderIso
section Preorder
variable {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.le_iff_le]
#align order_iso.preimage_Iic OrderIso.preimage_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.le_iff_le]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ici OrderIso.preimage_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.lt_iff_lt]
#align order_iso.preimage_Iio OrderIso.preimage_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.lt_iff_lt]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ioi OrderIso.preimage_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align order_iso.preimage_Icc OrderIso.preimage_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ico OrderIso.preimage_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ioc OrderIso.preimage_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ioo OrderIso.preimage_Ioo
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/OrderIso.lean | 68 | 69 | theorem image_Iic (e : α ≃o β) (a : α) : e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) := by |
rw [e.image_eq_preimage, e.symm.preimage_Iic, e.symm_symm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.oangle`, with notation `∡`, is the oriented angle determined by three
points.
-/
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
/-- A fixed choice of positive orientation of Euclidean space `ℝ²` -/
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
/-- The oriented angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and `p₃`, modulo `2 * π`. If
either of those points equals `p₂`, this is 0. See `EuclideanGeometry.angle` for the
corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle EuclideanGeometry.oangle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when neither end point equals the middle point. -/
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (o.continuousAt_oangle hf1 hf2).comp ((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_oangle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_oangle
/-- The angle ∡AAB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left
/-- The angle ∡ABB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_right
/-- The angle ∡ABA at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left_right
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the last two points are not equal.
-/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- Reversing the order of the points passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rev
/-- Adding an angle to that with the order of the points reversed results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev
/-- An oriented angle is zero if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
/-- An oriented angle is `π` if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
`π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
/-- An oriented angle is not zero or `π` if and only if the three points are affinely
independent. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 218 | 225 | theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by |
rw [oangle, o.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub ℝ _ (1 : Fin 3), ←
linearIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (1 : Fin 3)).toEquiv]
convert Iff.rfl
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.RestrictScalars
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.comp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives of compositions of functions
In this file we prove the chain rule for the following cases:
* `HasDerivAt.comp` etc: `f : 𝕜' → 𝕜'` composed with `g : 𝕜 → 𝕜'`;
* `HasDerivAt.scomp` etc: `f : 𝕜' → E` composed with `g : 𝕜 → 𝕜'`;
* `HasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt` etc: `f : E → F` composed with `g : 𝕜 → E`;
Here `𝕜` is the base normed field, `E` and `F` are normed spaces over `𝕜` and `𝕜'` is an algebra
over `𝕜` (e.g., `𝕜'=𝕜` or `𝕜=ℝ`, `𝕜'=ℂ`).
We also give versions with the `of_eq` suffix, which require an equality proof instead
of definitional equality of the different points used in the composition. These versions are
often more flexible to use.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`analysis/calculus/deriv/basic`.
## Keywords
derivative, chain rule
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter ENNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
section Composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of a vector function and a scalar function
We use `scomp` in lemmas on composition of vector valued and scalar valued functions, and `comp`
in lemmas on composition of scalar valued functions, in analogy for `smul` and `mul` (and also
because the `comp` version with the shorter name will show up much more often in applications).
The formula for the derivative involves `smul` in `scomp` lemmas, which can be reduced to
usual multiplication in `comp` lemmas.
-/
/- For composition lemmas, we put x explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition -/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] {s' t' : Set 𝕜'} {h : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {h₁ : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {h₂ : 𝕜' → 𝕜'} {h' h₂' : 𝕜'}
{h₁' : 𝕜} {g₁ : 𝕜' → F} {g₁' : F} {L' : Filter 𝕜'} {y : 𝕜'} (x)
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh hL).hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_deriv_at_filter.scomp HasDerivAtFilter.scomp
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' y L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hy : y = h x) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hL
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') : HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hh.continuousAt, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall hs⟩
#align has_deriv_within_at.scomp_has_deriv_at HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' y)
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp_hasDerivAt x hh hs
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| hh.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.scomp HasDerivWithinAt.scomp
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Comp.lean | 101 | 104 | theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x := by |
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hst
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
#align uniform_space_of_dist UniformSpace.ofDist
-- Porting note: dropped the `dist_self` argument
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun x hx y => hx.elim⟩ (fun s ⟨c, hc⟩ t h => ⟨c, fun x hx y hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
#align bornology.of_dist Bornology.ofDistₓ
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
dist : α → α → ℝ
#align has_dist Dist
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
#noalign pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist_tac -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore
/-- Pseudo metric and Metric spaces
A pseudo metric space is endowed with a distance for which the requirement `d(x,y)=0 → x = y` might
not hold. A metric space is a pseudo metric space such that `d(x,y)=0 → x = y`.
Each pseudo metric space induces a canonical `UniformSpace` and hence a canonical
`TopologicalSpace` This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `UniformSpace`
structure. When instantiating a `PseudoMetricSpace` structure, the uniformity fields are not
necessary, they will be filled in by default. In the same way, each (pseudo) metric space induces a
(pseudo) emetric space structure. It is included in the structure, but filled in by default.
-/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends Dist α : Type u where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y)
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add := by _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space PseudoMetricSpace
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with d _ _ _ ed hed U hU B hB
cases' m' with d' _ _ _ ed' hed' U' hU' B' hB'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
#align pseudo_metric_space.ext PseudoMetricSpace.ext
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_edist PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
#align pseudo_metric_space.of_dist_topology PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
#align dist_self dist_self
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
#align dist_comm dist_comm
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
#align edist_dist edist_dist
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
#align dist_triangle dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_left dist_triangle_left
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_right dist_triangle_right
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
#align dist_triangle4 dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_left dist_triangle4_left
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_right dist_triangle4_right
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, dist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
dist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ dist (f m) (f n) + dist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_dist dist_le_Ico_sum_dist
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align dist_le_range_sum_dist dist_le_range_sum_dist
/-- A version of `dist_le_Ico_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le
/-- A version of `dist_le_range_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
#align swap_dist swap_dist
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
#align abs_dist_sub_le abs_dist_sub_le
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
#align dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align abs_dist abs_dist
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
#align has_nndist NNDist
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_nndist PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
#align dist_nndist dist_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
#align coe_nndist coe_nndist
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align edist_nndist edist_nndist
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
#align nndist_edist nndist_edist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
#align coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
#align edist_lt_coe edist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align edist_le_coe edist_le_coe
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
#align edist_lt_top edist_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
#align edist_ne_top edist_ne_top
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes-/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
#align nndist_self nndist_self
-- Porting note: `dist_nndist` and `coe_nndist` moved up
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_lt_coe dist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_le_coe dist_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
#align edist_lt_of_real edist_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
#align edist_le_of_real edist_le_ofReal
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist`-/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
#align nndist_dist nndist_dist
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
#align nndist_comm nndist_comm
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance-/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle nndist_triangle
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_left nndist_triangle_left
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_right nndist_triangle_right
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
#align dist_edist dist_edist
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
#align metric.ball Metric.ball
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_ball Metric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball' Metric.mem_ball'
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
#align metric.pos_of_mem_ball Metric.pos_of_mem_ball
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_ball_self Metric.mem_ball_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_ball Metric.nonempty_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
#align metric.ball_eq_empty Metric.ball_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
#align metric.ball_zero Metric.ball_zero
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball Metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
#align metric.ball_eq_ball Metric.ball_eq_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
#align metric.ball_eq_ball' Metric.ball_eq_ball'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_ball_nat
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat_succ Metric.iUnion_ball_nat_succ
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
#align metric.closed_ball Metric.closedBall
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_closed_ball Metric.mem_closedBall
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball' Metric.mem_closedBall'
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
#align metric.sphere Metric.sphere
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_sphere Metric.mem_sphere
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
#align metric.mem_sphere' Metric.mem_sphere'
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
#align metric.ne_of_mem_sphere Metric.ne_of_mem_sphere
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
#align metric.nonneg_of_mem_sphere Metric.nonneg_of_mem_sphere
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
#align metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_neg Metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_neg
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
#align metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton Metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
#align metric.sphere_is_empty_of_subsingleton Metric.sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball_self Metric.mem_closedBall_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_closed_ball Metric.nonempty_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_empty Metric.closedBall_eq_empty
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_sphere_of_nonpos Metric.closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
#align metric.ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.ball_subset_closedBall
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
#align metric.sphere_subset_closed_ball Metric.sphere_subset_closedBall
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
#align metric.closed_ball_disjoint_ball Metric.closedBall_disjoint_ball
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
#align metric.ball_disjoint_closed_ball Metric.ball_disjoint_closedBall
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.ball_disjoint_ball Metric.ball_disjoint_ball
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
#align metric.closed_ball_disjoint_closed_ball Metric.closedBall_disjoint_closedBall
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
#align metric.sphere_disjoint_ball Metric.sphere_disjoint_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
#align metric.ball_union_sphere Metric.ball_union_sphere
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
#align metric.sphere_union_ball Metric.sphere_union_ball
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
#align metric.closed_ball_diff_sphere Metric.closedBall_diff_sphere
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
#align metric.closed_ball_diff_ball Metric.closedBall_diff_ball
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball_comm Metric.mem_ball_comm
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball_comm Metric.mem_closedBall_comm
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
#align metric.mem_sphere_comm Metric.mem_sphere_comm
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
#align metric.ball_subset_ball Metric.ball_subset_ball
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_bInter_ball Metric.closedBall_eq_bInter_ball
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
#align metric.ball_subset_ball' Metric.ball_subset_ball'
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.closedBall_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_closed_ball' Metric.closedBall_subset_closedBall'
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_ball Metric.closedBall_subset_ball
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_ball' Metric.closedBall_subset_ball'
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
#align metric.dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closed_ball_inter_closed_ball Metric.dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closed_ball_inter_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closed_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
#align metric.Union_closed_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_closedBall_nat
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
#align metric.Union_inter_closed_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
#align metric.ball_subset Metric.ball_subset
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
#align metric.ball_half_subset Metric.ball_half_subset
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
#align metric.exists_ball_subset_ball Metric.exists_ball_subset_ball
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
#align metric.forall_of_forall_mem_closed_ball Metric.forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
#align metric.forall_of_forall_mem_ball Metric.forall_of_forall_mem_ball
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
#align metric.is_bounded_iff Metric.isBounded_iff
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_eventually Metric.isBounded_iff_eventually
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_exists_ge Metric.isBounded_iff_exists_ge
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_nndist Metric.isBounded_iff_nndist
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
#align metric.to_uniform_space_eq Metric.toUniformSpace_eq
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
#align metric.mk_uniformity_basis Metric.mk_uniformity_basis
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_rat Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_rat
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_pow Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_pow
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_lt Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_lt
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
#align metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
#align metric.mem_uniformity_dist Metric.mem_uniformity_dist
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, id⟩
#align metric.dist_mem_uniformity Metric.dist_mem_uniformity
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.uniform_continuous_iff Metric.uniformContinuous_iff
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.uniform_continuous_on_iff Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
#align metric.uniform_continuous_on_iff_le Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff_le
nonrec theorem uniformInducing_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ :=
uniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_dist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_dist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, gt_iff_lt, preimage_setOf_eq, Prod.map_apply, mem_setOf]
nonrec theorem uniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ := by
rw [uniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, uniformInducing_iff]
#align metric.uniform_embedding_iff Metric.uniformEmbedding_iff
/-- If a map between pseudometric spaces is a uniform embedding then the distance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`. -/
theorem controlled_of_uniformEmbedding [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} (h : UniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (uniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
#align metric.controlled_of_uniform_embedding Metric.controlled_of_uniformEmbedding
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.totallyBounded_iff
#align metric.totally_bounded_iff Metric.totallyBounded_iff
/-- A pseudometric space is totally bounded if one can reconstruct up to any ε>0 any element of the
space from finitely many data. -/
theorem totallyBounded_of_finite_discretization {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ),
∃ (β : Type u) (_ : Fintype β) (F : s → β), ∀ x y, F x = F y → dist (x : α) y < ε) :
TotallyBounded s := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rw [hs]
exact totallyBounded_empty
rcases hs with ⟨x0, hx0⟩
haveI : Inhabited s := ⟨⟨x0, hx0⟩⟩
refine totallyBounded_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases H ε ε0 with ⟨β, fβ, F, hF⟩
let Finv := Function.invFun F
refine ⟨range (Subtype.val ∘ Finv), finite_range _, fun x xs => ?_⟩
let x' := Finv (F ⟨x, xs⟩)
have : F x' = F ⟨x, xs⟩ := Function.invFun_eq ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨_, ⟨F ⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩, hF _ _ this.symm⟩
#align metric.totally_bounded_of_finite_discretization Metric.totallyBounded_of_finite_discretization
theorem finite_approx_of_totallyBounded {s : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε := by
intro ε ε_pos
rw [totallyBounded_iff_subset] at hs
exact hs _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε_pos)
#align metric.finite_approx_of_totally_bounded Metric.finite_approx_of_totallyBounded
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `dist` -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter β} :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n : ι × β in p ×ˢ p', dist (f n.snd) (F n.fst n.snd) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hn => hε hn
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_iff Metric.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, dist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
#align metric.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on_iff Metric.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, dist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_on_iff Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, dist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, nhdsWithin_univ,
mem_univ, forall_const, exists_prop]
#align metric.tendsto_locally_uniformly_iff Metric.tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, dist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff]
simp
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_iff Metric.tendstoUniformly_iff
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, dist x y < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.cauchy_iff
#align metric.cauchy_iff Metric.cauchy_iff
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball Metric.nhds_basis_ball
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
#align metric.mem_nhds_iff Metric.mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
#align metric.eventually_nhds_iff Metric.eventually_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
#align metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball Metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ {x}, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ {i}, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
#align metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ {i}, pa i → ∀ {x}, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
#align metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff Metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
#align metric.nhds_basis_closed_ball Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ Metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos Metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_pow Metric.nhds_basis_ball_pow
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
#align metric.nhds_basis_closed_ball_pow Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall_pow
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
#align metric.is_open_iff Metric.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
#align metric.is_open_ball Metric.isOpen_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
#align metric.ball_mem_nhds Metric.ball_mem_nhds
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.closed_ball_mem_nhds Metric.closedBall_mem_nhds
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.closed_ball_mem_nhds_of_mem Metric.closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
#align metric.nhds_within_basis_ball Metric.nhdsWithin_basis_ball
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
#align metric.mem_nhds_within_iff Metric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_within_nhds_within Metric.tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and_iff]
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_within_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_at_iff Metric.continuousAt_iff
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_within_at_iff Metric.continuousWithinAt_iff
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
#align metric.continuous_on_iff Metric.continuousOn_iff
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
#align metric.continuous_iff Metric.continuous_iff
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
#align metric.tendsto_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhds
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_at_iff' Metric.continuousAt_iff'
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_within_at_iff' Metric.continuousWithinAt_iff'
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
#align metric.continuous_on_iff' Metric.continuousOn_iff'
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
#align metric.continuous_iff' Metric.continuous_iff'
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
#align metric.tendsto_at_top Metric.tendsto_atTop
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
#align metric.tendsto_at_top' Metric.tendsto_atTop'
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
#align metric.is_open_singleton_iff Metric.isOpen_singleton_iff
/-- Given a point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a pseudometric space, there is an open ball
centered at `x` and intersecting `s` only at `x`. -/
theorem exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete [DiscreteTopology s] {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ ε > 0, Metric.ball x ε ∩ s = {x} :=
nhds_basis_ball.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align metric.exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete Metric.exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
/-- Given a point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a pseudometric space, there is a closed ball
of positive radius centered at `x` and intersecting `s` only at `x`. -/
theorem exists_closedBall_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology s] {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ ε > 0, Metric.closedBall x ε ∩ s = {x} :=
nhds_basis_closedBall.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align metric.exists_closed_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete Metric.exists_closedBall_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
#align dense.exists_dist_lt Dense.exists_dist_lt
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
#align dense_range.exists_dist_lt DenseRange.exists_dist_lt
end Metric
open Metric
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
#align metric.uniformity_edist Metric.uniformity_edist
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_pseudo_emetric_space PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace
/-- Expressing the uniformity in terms of `edist` -/
@[deprecated _root_.uniformity_basis_edist]
protected theorem Metric.uniformity_basis_edist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
uniformity_basis_edist
#align pseudo_metric.uniformity_basis_edist Metric.uniformity_basis_edist
/-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
#align metric.eball_top_eq_univ Metric.eball_top_eq_univ
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : EMetric.ball x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = ball x ε := by
ext y
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, mem_ball, edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align metric.emetric_ball Metric.emetric_ball
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} : EMetric.ball x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_ball]
simp
#align metric.emetric_ball_nnreal Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
EMetric.closedBall x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = closedBall x ε := by
ext y; simp [edist_le_ofReal h]
#align metric.emetric_closed_ball Metric.emetric_closedBall
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} :
EMetric.closedBall x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_closedBall ε.coe_nonneg, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align metric.emetric_closed_ball_nnreal Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_top (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ⊤ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => edist_lt_top _ _
#align metric.emetric_ball_top Metric.emetric_ball_top
theorem Metric.inseparable_iff {x y : α} : Inseparable x y ↔ dist x y = 0 := by
rw [EMetric.inseparable_iff, edist_nndist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
#align metric.inseparable_iff Metric.inseparable_iff
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled uniform structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given uniform structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_dist := H.trans PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist }
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_uniformity PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : m.replaceUniformity H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_uniformity_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq
-- ensure that the bornology is unchanged when replacing the uniformity.
example {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity m H).toBornology = m.toBornology := rfl
/-- Build a new pseudo metric space from an old one where the bundled topological structure is
provably (but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given topological structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : PseudoMetricSpace γ :=
@PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity γ (m.toUniformSpace.replaceTopology H) m rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_topology PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : m.replaceTopology H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_topology_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the pseudoemetric space. In this definition, the
distance is given separately, to be able to prescribe some expression which is not defeq to the
push-forward of the edistance to reals. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist {α : Type u} [e : PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(dist : α → α → ℝ) (edist_ne_top : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤)
(h : ∀ x y, dist x y = ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) : PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist := dist
dist_self x := by simp [h]
dist_comm x y := by simp [h, edist_comm]
dist_triangle x y z := by
simp only [h]
exact ENNReal.toReal_le_add (edist_triangle _ _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _)
edist := edist
edist_dist _ _ := by simp only [h, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _)]
toUniformSpace := e.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := e.uniformity_edist.trans <| by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (edist_ne_top _ _), h]
using (Metric.uniformity_edist_aux fun x y : α => (edist x y).toNNReal).symm
#align pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space_of_dist PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the emetric space. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist (fun x y => ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) h fun _ _ =>
rfl
#align pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled bornology structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given bornology structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toBornology := B
cobounded_sets := Set.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 fun s =>
(H s).trans <| by rw [isBounded_iff, mem_setOf_eq, compl_compl] }
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_bornology PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq {α} [m : PseudoMetricSpace α] [B : Bornology α]
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology _ H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_bornology_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq
-- ensure that the uniformity is unchanged when replacing the bornology.
example {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology m H).toUniformSpace = m.toUniformSpace := rfl
section Real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a pseudometric space. -/
instance Real.pseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ where
dist x y := |x - y|
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero]
dist_comm x y := abs_sub_comm _ _
dist_triangle x y z := abs_sub_le _ _ _
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
#align real.pseudo_metric_space Real.pseudoMetricSpace
theorem Real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = |x - y| := rfl
#align real.dist_eq Real.dist_eq
theorem Real.nndist_eq (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (x - y) := rfl
#align real.nndist_eq Real.nndist_eq
theorem Real.nndist_eq' (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (y - x) :=
nndist_comm _ _
#align real.nndist_eq' Real.nndist_eq'
theorem Real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = |x| := by simp [Real.dist_eq]
#align real.dist_0_eq_abs Real.dist_0_eq_abs
theorem Real.sub_le_dist (x y : ℝ) : x - y ≤ dist x y := by
rw [Real.dist_eq, le_abs]
exact Or.inl (le_refl _)
theorem Real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y z : ℝ} (h : y ∈ uIcc x z) : dist x y ≤ dist x z := by
simpa only [dist_comm x] using abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc h
#align real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y z : ℝ} (h : y ∈ uIcc x z) : dist y z ≤ dist x z := by
simpa only [dist_comm _ z] using abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc h
#align real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y x' y' : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ uIcc x' y') (hy : y ∈ uIcc x' y') :
dist x y ≤ dist x' y' :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc (by rwa [uIcc_comm]) (by rwa [uIcc_comm])
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc {x y x' y' : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc x' y') (hy : y ∈ Icc x' y') :
dist x y ≤ y' - x' := by
simpa only [Real.dist_eq, abs_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 <| hx.1.trans hx.2), neg_sub] using
Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc (Icc_subset_uIcc hx) (Icc_subset_uIcc hy)
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
dist x y ≤ 1 := by simpa only [sub_zero] using Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc hx hy
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01
instance : OrderTopology ℝ :=
orderTopology_of_nhds_abs fun x => by
simp only [nhds_basis_ball.eq_biInf, ball, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_comm]
theorem Real.ball_eq_Ioo (x r : ℝ) : ball x r = Ioo (x - r) (x + r) :=
Set.ext fun y => by
rw [mem_ball, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_lt_iff, mem_Ioo, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add',
sub_lt_comm]
#align real.ball_eq_Ioo Real.ball_eq_Ioo
theorem Real.closedBall_eq_Icc {x r : ℝ} : closedBall x r = Icc (x - r) (x + r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff, mem_Icc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add',
sub_le_comm]
#align real.closed_ball_eq_Icc Real.closedBall_eq_Icc
theorem Real.Ioo_eq_ball (x y : ℝ) : Ioo x y = ball ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.ball_eq_Ioo, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
#align real.Ioo_eq_ball Real.Ioo_eq_ball
theorem Real.Icc_eq_closedBall (x y : ℝ) : Icc x y = closedBall ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
#align real.Icc_eq_closed_ball Real.Icc_eq_closedBall
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem; see `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'` for the
general case. -/
theorem squeeze_zero' {α} {f g : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (hf : ∀ᶠ t in t₀, 0 ≤ f t)
(hft : ∀ᶠ t in t₀, f t ≤ g t) (g0 : Tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds g0 hf hft
#align squeeze_zero' squeeze_zero'
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem; see `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le`
and `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'` for the general case. -/
theorem squeeze_zero {α} {f g : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (hf : ∀ t, 0 ≤ f t) (hft : ∀ t, f t ≤ g t)
(g0 : Tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall hf) (eventually_of_forall hft) g0
#align squeeze_zero squeeze_zero
theorem Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero :
𝓤 α = comap (fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
ext s
simp only [mem_uniformity_dist, (nhds_basis_ball.comap _).mem_iff]
simp [subset_def, Real.dist_0_eq_abs]
#align metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero
theorem cauchySeq_iff_tendsto_dist_atTop_0 [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ Tendsto (fun n : β × β => dist (u n.1) (u n.2)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto, Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, tendsto_comap_iff,
Function.comp_def]
simp_rw [Prod.map_apply]
#align cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto_dist_at_top_0 cauchySeq_iff_tendsto_dist_atTop_0
theorem tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : ι → α × α} {p : Filter ι} :
Tendsto f p (𝓤 α) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => dist (f x).1 (f x).2) p (𝓝 0) := by
rw [Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist {f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {p : Filter ι} {a : α}
(h₁ : Tendsto f₁ p (𝓝 a)) (h : Tendsto (fun x => dist (f₁ x) (f₂ x)) p (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto f₂ p (𝓝 a) :=
h₁.congr_uniformity <| tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 h
#align filter.tendsto.congr_dist Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist
alias tendsto_of_tendsto_of_dist := Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist
#align tendsto_of_tendsto_of_dist tendsto_of_tendsto_of_dist
theorem tendsto_iff_of_dist {f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {p : Filter ι} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto (fun x => dist (f₁ x) (f₂ x)) p (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f₁ p (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto f₂ p (𝓝 a) :=
Uniform.tendsto_congr <| tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 h
#align tendsto_iff_of_dist tendsto_iff_of_dist
/-- If `u` is a neighborhood of `x`, then for small enough `r`, the closed ball
`Metric.closedBall x r` is contained in `u`. -/
theorem eventually_closedBall_subset {x : α} {u : Set α} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∀ᶠ r in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), closedBall x r ⊆ u := by
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε, 0 < ε ∧ closedBall x ε ⊆ u := nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff.1 hu
have : Iic ε ∈ 𝓝 (0 : ℝ) := Iic_mem_nhds εpos
filter_upwards [this] with _ hr using Subset.trans (closedBall_subset_closedBall hr) hε
#align eventually_closed_ball_subset eventually_closedBall_subset
theorem tendsto_closedBall_smallSets (x : α) : Tendsto (closedBall x) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 x).smallSets :=
tendsto_smallSets_iff.2 fun _ ↦ eventually_closedBall_subset
end Real
/-- Pseudometric space structure pulled back by a function. -/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (m : PseudoMetricSpace β) :
PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist x y := dist (f x) (f y)
dist_self x := dist_self _
dist_comm x y := dist_comm _ _
dist_triangle x y z := dist_triangle _ _ _
edist x y := edist (f x) (f y)
edist_dist x y := edist_dist _ _
toUniformSpace := UniformSpace.comap f m.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := (uniformity_basis_dist.comap _).eq_biInf
toBornology := Bornology.induced f
cobounded_sets := Set.ext fun s => mem_comap_iff_compl.trans <| by
simp only [← isBounded_def, isBounded_iff, forall_mem_image, mem_setOf]
#align pseudo_metric_space.induced PseudoMetricSpace.induced
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by an inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `TopologicalSpace`
structure. -/
def Inducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β} [TopologicalSpace α] [m : PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Inducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceTopology (.induced f m) hf.induced
#align inducing.comap_pseudo_metric_space Inducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by a uniform inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `UniformSpace`
structure. -/
def UniformInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β} [UniformSpace α] [m : PseudoMetricSpace β]
(f : α → β) (h : UniformInducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceUniformity (.induced f m) h.comap_uniformity.symm
#align uniform_inducing.comap_pseudo_metric_space UniformInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace
instance Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace {p : α → Prop} : PseudoMetricSpace (Subtype p) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced Subtype.val ‹_›
#align subtype.pseudo_metric_space Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace
theorem Subtype.dist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : dist x y = dist (x : α) y :=
rfl
#align subtype.dist_eq Subtype.dist_eq
theorem Subtype.nndist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : nndist x y = nndist (x : α) y :=
rfl
#align subtype.nndist_eq Subtype.nndist_eq
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance instPseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : dist (unop x) (unop y) = dist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.dist_unop MulOpposite.dist_unop
#align add_opposite.dist_unop AddOpposite.dist_unop
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_op (x y : α) : dist (op x) (op y) = dist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.dist_op MulOpposite.dist_op
#align add_opposite.dist_op AddOpposite.dist_op
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : nndist (unop x) (unop y) = nndist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.nndist_unop MulOpposite.nndist_unop
#align add_opposite.nndist_unop AddOpposite.nndist_unop
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_op (x y : α) : nndist (op x) (op y) = nndist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.nndist_op MulOpposite.nndist_op
#align add_opposite.nndist_op AddOpposite.nndist_op
end MulOpposite
section NNReal
instance : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ≥0 := Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace
theorem NNReal.dist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : dist a b = |(a : ℝ) - b| := rfl
#align nnreal.dist_eq NNReal.dist_eq
theorem NNReal.nndist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : nndist a b = max (a - b) (b - a) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ => by
simp only [max_le_iff, tsub_le_iff_right (α := ℝ≥0)]
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nndist, dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff,
tsub_le_iff_right, NNReal.coe_add]
#align nnreal.nndist_eq NNReal.nndist_eq
@[simp]
theorem NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist 0 z = z := by
simp only [NNReal.nndist_eq, max_eq_right, tsub_zero, zero_tsub, zero_le']
#align nnreal.nndist_zero_eq_val NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val
@[simp]
theorem NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val' (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist z 0 = z := by
rw [nndist_comm]
exact NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val z
#align nnreal.nndist_zero_eq_val' NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val'
theorem NNReal.le_add_nndist (a b : ℝ≥0) : a ≤ b + nndist a b := by
suffices (a : ℝ) ≤ (b : ℝ) + dist a b by
rwa [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_nndist]
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact le_of_abs_le (dist_eq a b).ge
#align nnreal.le_add_nndist NNReal.le_add_nndist
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Ico 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico (c : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Ico 0 c.toNNReal := by
by_cases c_pos : 0 < c
· convert NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' ⟨c, c_pos.le⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_pos.le]
simp [not_lt.mp c_pos]
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Icc 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc {c : ℝ} (c_nn : 0 ≤ c) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Icc 0 c.toNNReal := by
convert NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' ⟨c, c_nn⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_nn]
end NNReal
section ULift
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (ULift β) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced ULift.down ‹_›
theorem ULift.dist_eq (x y : ULift β) : dist x y = dist x.down y.down := rfl
#align ulift.dist_eq ULift.dist_eq
theorem ULift.nndist_eq (x y : ULift β) : nndist x y = nndist x.down y.down := rfl
#align ulift.nndist_eq ULift.nndist_eq
@[simp]
theorem ULift.dist_up_up (x y : β) : dist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = dist x y := rfl
#align ulift.dist_up_up ULift.dist_up_up
@[simp]
theorem ULift.nndist_up_up (x y : β) : nndist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = nndist x y := rfl
#align ulift.nndist_up_up ULift.nndist_up_up
end ULift
section Prod
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
-- Porting note: added `let`, otherwise `simp` failed
instance Prod.pseudoMetricSpaceMax : PseudoMetricSpace (α × β) :=
let i := PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
(fun x y : α × β => dist x.1 y.1 ⊔ dist x.2 y.2)
(fun x y => (max_lt (edist_lt_top _ _) (edist_lt_top _ _)).ne) fun x y => by
simp only [sup_eq_max, dist_edist, ← ENNReal.toReal_max (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _),
Prod.edist_eq]
i.replaceBornology fun s => by
simp only [← isBounded_image_fst_and_snd, isBounded_iff_eventually, forall_mem_image, ←
eventually_and, ← forall_and, ← max_le_iff]
rfl
#align prod.pseudo_metric_space_max Prod.pseudoMetricSpaceMax
theorem Prod.dist_eq {x y : α × β} : dist x y = max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) := rfl
#align prod.dist_eq Prod.dist_eq
@[simp]
theorem dist_prod_same_left {x : α} {y₁ y₂ : β} : dist (x, y₁) (x, y₂) = dist y₁ y₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
#align dist_prod_same_left dist_prod_same_left
@[simp]
theorem dist_prod_same_right {x₁ x₂ : α} {y : β} : dist (x₁, y) (x₂, y) = dist x₁ x₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
#align dist_prod_same_right dist_prod_same_right
theorem ball_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) : ball x r ×ˢ ball y r = ball (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
#align ball_prod_same ball_prod_same
theorem closedBall_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall x r ×ˢ closedBall y r = closedBall (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
#align closed_ball_prod_same closedBall_prod_same
theorem sphere_prod (x : α × β) (r : ℝ) :
sphere x r = sphere x.1 r ×ˢ closedBall x.2 r ∪ closedBall x.1 r ×ˢ sphere x.2 r := by
obtain hr | rfl | hr := lt_trichotomy r 0
· simp [hr]
· cases x
simp_rw [← closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos le_rfl, union_self, closedBall_prod_same]
· ext ⟨x', y'⟩
simp_rw [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_prod, Metric.mem_closedBall, Metric.mem_sphere, Prod.dist_eq,
max_eq_iff]
refine or_congr (and_congr_right ?_) (and_comm.trans (and_congr_left ?_))
all_goals rintro rfl; rfl
#align sphere_prod sphere_prod
end Prod
-- Porting note: 3 new lemmas
theorem dist_dist_dist_le_left (x y z : α) : dist (dist x z) (dist y z) ≤ dist x y :=
abs_dist_sub_le ..
theorem dist_dist_dist_le_right (x y z : α) : dist (dist x y) (dist x z) ≤ dist y z := by
simpa only [dist_comm x] using dist_dist_dist_le_left y z x
theorem dist_dist_dist_le (x y x' y' : α) : dist (dist x y) (dist x' y') ≤ dist x x' + dist y y' :=
(dist_triangle _ _ _).trans <|
add_le_add (dist_dist_dist_le_left _ _ _) (dist_dist_dist_le_right _ _ _)
theorem uniformContinuous_dist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2 :=
Metric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε ε0 =>
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a b} h =>
calc dist (dist a.1 a.2) (dist b.1 b.2) ≤ dist a.1 b.1 + dist a.2 b.2 :=
dist_dist_dist_le _ _ _ _
_ ≤ dist a b + dist a b := add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)
_ < ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_lt_add h h
_ = ε := add_halves ε⟩
#align uniform_continuous_dist uniformContinuous_dist
protected theorem UniformContinuous.dist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun b => dist (f b) (g b) :=
uniformContinuous_dist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align uniform_continuous.dist UniformContinuous.dist
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_dist : Continuous fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_dist.continuous
#align continuous_dist continuous_dist
@[continuity, fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.dist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => dist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_dist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
#align continuous.dist Continuous.dist
protected theorem Filter.Tendsto.dist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
Tendsto (fun x => dist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (dist a b)) :=
(continuous_dist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
#align filter.tendsto.dist Filter.Tendsto.dist
theorem nhds_comap_dist (a : α) : ((𝓝 (0 : ℝ)).comap (dist · a)) = 𝓝 a := by
simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity α, Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, comap_comap,
(· ∘ ·), dist_comm]
#align nhds_comap_dist nhds_comap_dist
theorem tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a : α} :
Tendsto f x (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun b => dist (f b) a) x (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← nhds_comap_dist a, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero
theorem continuous_iff_continuous_dist [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous fun x : β × β => dist (f x.1) (f x.2) :=
⟨fun h => h.fst'.dist h.snd', fun h =>
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 <|
(h.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)).tendsto' _ _ <| dist_self _⟩
#align continuous_iff_continuous_dist continuous_iff_continuous_dist
theorem uniformContinuous_nndist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => nndist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_dist.subtype_mk _
#align uniform_continuous_nndist uniformContinuous_nndist
protected theorem UniformContinuous.nndist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
uniformContinuous_nndist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align uniform_continuous.nndist UniformContinuous.nndist
theorem continuous_nndist : Continuous fun p : α × α => nndist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_nndist.continuous
#align continuous_nndist continuous_nndist
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.nndist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_nndist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
#align continuous.nndist Continuous.nndist
protected theorem Filter.Tendsto.nndist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
Tendsto (fun x => nndist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (nndist a b)) :=
(continuous_nndist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
#align filter.tendsto.nndist Filter.Tendsto.nndist
namespace Metric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_ball : IsClosed (closedBall x ε) :=
isClosed_le (continuous_id.dist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align metric.is_closed_ball Metric.isClosed_ball
theorem isClosed_sphere : IsClosed (sphere x ε) :=
isClosed_eq (continuous_id.dist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align metric.is_closed_sphere Metric.isClosed_sphere
@[simp]
theorem closure_closedBall : closure (closedBall x ε) = closedBall x ε :=
isClosed_ball.closure_eq
#align metric.closure_closed_ball Metric.closure_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem closure_sphere : closure (sphere x ε) = sphere x ε :=
isClosed_sphere.closure_eq
#align metric.closure_sphere Metric.closure_sphere
theorem closure_ball_subset_closedBall : closure (ball x ε) ⊆ closedBall x ε :=
closure_minimal ball_subset_closedBall isClosed_ball
#align metric.closure_ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.closure_ball_subset_closedBall
theorem frontier_ball_subset_sphere : frontier (ball x ε) ⊆ sphere x ε :=
frontier_lt_subset_eq (continuous_id.dist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align metric.frontier_ball_subset_sphere Metric.frontier_ball_subset_sphere
theorem frontier_closedBall_subset_sphere : frontier (closedBall x ε) ⊆ sphere x ε :=
frontier_le_subset_eq (continuous_id.dist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align metric.frontier_closed_ball_subset_sphere Metric.frontier_closedBall_subset_sphere
theorem ball_subset_interior_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ interior (closedBall x ε) :=
interior_maximal ball_subset_closedBall isOpen_ball
#align metric.ball_subset_interior_closed_ball Metric.ball_subset_interior_closedBall
/-- ε-characterization of the closure in pseudometric spaces-/
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ b ∈ s, dist a b < ε :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by simp only [mem_ball, dist_comm]
#align metric.mem_closure_iff Metric.mem_closure_iff
theorem mem_closure_range_iff {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < ε := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff, exists_range_iff]
#align metric.mem_closure_range_iff Metric.mem_closure_range_iff
theorem mem_closure_range_iff_nat {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1) :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ).trans <| by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_comm, exists_range_iff, forall_const]
#align metric.mem_closure_range_iff_nat Metric.mem_closure_range_iff_nat
theorem mem_of_closed' {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {a : α} :
a ∈ s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ b ∈ s, dist a b < ε := by
simpa only [hs.closure_eq] using @mem_closure_iff _ _ s a
#align metric.mem_of_closed' Metric.mem_of_closed'
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : α) : closedBall x 0 = closure {x} :=
Subset.antisymm
(fun _y hy =>
mem_closure_iff.2 fun _ε ε0 => ⟨x, mem_singleton x, (mem_closedBall.1 hy).trans_lt ε0⟩)
(closure_minimal (singleton_subset_iff.2 (dist_self x).le) isClosed_ball)
#align metric.closed_ball_zero' Metric.closedBall_zero'
lemma eventually_isCompact_closedBall [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ r in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), IsCompact (closedBall x r) := by
rcases exists_compact_mem_nhds x with ⟨s, s_compact, hs⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_closedBall_subset hs] with r hr
exact IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset s_compact isClosed_ball hr
lemma exists_isCompact_closedBall [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] (x : α) :
∃ r, 0 < r ∧ IsCompact (closedBall x r) := by
have : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[>] 0, IsCompact (closedBall x r) :=
eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds (eventually_isCompact_closedBall x)
simpa only [and_comm] using (this.and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
theorem dense_iff {s : Set α} : Dense s ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r > 0, (ball x r ∩ s).Nonempty :=
forall_congr' fun x => by
simp only [mem_closure_iff, Set.Nonempty, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, mem_ball', and_comm]
#align metric.dense_iff Metric.dense_iff
theorem denseRange_iff {f : β → α} : DenseRange f ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r > 0, ∃ y, dist x (f y) < r :=
forall_congr' fun x => by simp only [mem_closure_iff, exists_range_iff]
#align metric.dense_range_iff Metric.denseRange_iff
-- Porting note: `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.separableSpace` moved to `EMetricSpace`
/-- The preimage of a separable set by an inducing map is separable. -/
protected theorem _root_.Inducing.isSeparable_preimage {f : β → α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : Inducing f) {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : IsSeparable (f ⁻¹' s) := by
have : SeparableSpace s := hs.separableSpace
have : SecondCountableTopology s := UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable _
have : Inducing ((mapsTo_preimage f s).restrict _ _ _) :=
(hf.comp inducing_subtype_val).codRestrict _
have := this.secondCountableTopology
exact .of_subtype _
#align inducing.is_separable_preimage Inducing.isSeparable_preimage
protected theorem _root_.Embedding.isSeparable_preimage {f : β → α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : Embedding f) {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : IsSeparable (f ⁻¹' s) :=
hf.toInducing.isSeparable_preimage hs
#align embedding.is_separable_preimage Embedding.isSeparable_preimage
/-- If a map is continuous on a separable set `s`, then the image of `s` is also separable. -/
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.isSeparable_image [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsSeparable s) : IsSeparable (f '' s) := by
rw [image_eq_range, ← image_univ]
exact (isSeparable_univ_iff.2 hs.separableSpace).image hf.restrict
#align continuous_on.is_separable_image ContinuousOn.isSeparable_image
end Metric
/-- A compact set is separable. -/
theorem IsCompact.isSeparable {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) : IsSeparable s :=
haveI : CompactSpace s := isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp hs
.of_subtype s
#align is_compact.is_separable IsCompact.isSeparable
section Pi
open Finset
variable {π : β → Type*} [Fintype β] [∀ b, PseudoMetricSpace (π b)]
/-- A finite product of pseudometric spaces is a pseudometric space, with the sup distance. -/
instance pseudoMetricSpacePi : PseudoMetricSpace (∀ b, π b) := by
/- we construct the instance from the pseudoemetric space instance to avoid checking again that
the uniformity is the same as the product uniformity, but we register nevertheless a nice
formula for the distance -/
let i := PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
(fun f g : ∀ b, π b => ((sup univ fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ))
(fun f g => ((Finset.sup_lt_iff bot_lt_top).2 fun b _ => edist_lt_top _ _).ne)
(fun f g => by
simp only [edist_pi_def, edist_nndist, ← ENNReal.coe_finset_sup, ENNReal.coe_toReal])
refine i.replaceBornology fun s => ?_
simp only [← isBounded_def, isBounded_iff_eventually, ← forall_isBounded_image_eval_iff,
forall_mem_image, ← Filter.eventually_all, Function.eval_apply, @dist_nndist (π _)]
refine eventually_congr ((eventually_ge_atTop 0).mono fun C hC ↦ ?_)
lift C to ℝ≥0 using hC
refine ⟨fun H x hx y hy ↦ NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 <| Finset.sup_le fun b _ ↦ H b hx hy,
fun H b x hx y hy ↦ NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 ?_⟩
simpa only using Finset.sup_le_iff.1 (NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| H hx hy) b (Finset.mem_univ b)
#align pseudo_metric_space_pi pseudoMetricSpacePi
theorem nndist_pi_def (f g : ∀ b, π b) : nndist f g = sup univ fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
NNReal.eq rfl
#align nndist_pi_def nndist_pi_def
theorem dist_pi_def (f g : ∀ b, π b) : dist f g = (sup univ fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) : ℝ≥0) :=
rfl
#align dist_pi_def dist_pi_def
theorem nndist_pi_le_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ≥0} :
nndist f g ≤ r ↔ ∀ b, nndist (f b) (g b) ≤ r := by simp [nndist_pi_def]
#align nndist_pi_le_iff nndist_pi_le_iff
theorem nndist_pi_lt_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) :
nndist f g < r ↔ ∀ b, nndist (f b) (g b) < r := by
rw [← bot_eq_zero'] at hr
simp [nndist_pi_def, Finset.sup_lt_iff hr]
#align nndist_pi_lt_iff nndist_pi_lt_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PseudoMetric.lean | 1,920 | 1,926 | theorem nndist_pi_eq_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) :
nndist f g = r ↔ (∃ i, nndist (f i) (g i) = r) ∧ ∀ b, nndist (f b) (g b) ≤ r := by |
rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, nndist_pi_lt_iff hr, nndist_pi_le_iff, not_forall, and_comm]
simp_rw [not_lt, and_congr_left_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
intro h
refine exists_congr fun b => ?_
apply (and_iff_right <| h _).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice
#align_import combinatorics.set_family.compression.down from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Down-compressions
This file defines down-compression.
Down-compressing `𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)` along `a : α` means removing `a` from the elements of `𝒜`,
when the resulting set is not already in `𝒜`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.nonMemberSubfamily`: `𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a` is the subfamily of sets not containing
`a`.
* `Finset.memberSubfamily`: `𝒜.memberSubfamily a` is the image of the subfamily of sets containing
`a` under removing `a`.
* `Down.compression`: Down-compression.
## Notation
`𝓓 a 𝒜` is notation for `Down.compress a 𝒜` in locale `SetFamily`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, down-compression
-/
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α} {a : α}
namespace Finset
/-- Elements of `𝒜` that do not contain `a`. -/
def nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
𝒜.filter fun s => a ∉ s
#align finset.non_member_subfamily Finset.nonMemberSubfamily
/-- Image of the elements of `𝒜` which contain `a` under removing `a`. Finsets that do not contain
`a` such that `insert a s ∈ 𝒜`. -/
def memberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
(𝒜.filter fun s => a ∈ s).image fun s => erase s a
#align finset.member_subfamily Finset.memberSubfamily
@[simp]
theorem mem_nonMemberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ↔ s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp [nonMemberSubfamily]
#align finset.mem_non_member_subfamily Finset.mem_nonMemberSubfamily
@[simp]
theorem mem_memberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ↔ insert a s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨insert a s, ⟨h.1, by simp⟩, erase_insert h.2⟩⟩
rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs1, hs2⟩, rfl⟩
rw [insert_erase hs2]
exact ⟨hs1, not_mem_erase _ _⟩
#align finset.mem_member_subfamily Finset.mem_memberSubfamily
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_inter_distrib _ _ _
#align finset.non_member_subfamily_inter Finset.nonMemberSubfamily_inter
theorem memberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
unfold memberSubfamily
rw [filter_inter_distrib, image_inter_of_injOn _ _ ((erase_injOn' _).mono _)]
simp
#align finset.member_subfamily_inter Finset.memberSubfamily_inter
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_union _ _ _
#align finset.non_member_subfamily_union Finset.nonMemberSubfamily_union
theorem memberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, filter_union, image_union]
#align finset.member_subfamily_union Finset.memberSubfamily_union
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/Down.lean | 91 | 96 | theorem card_memberSubfamily_add_card_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜.memberSubfamily a).card + (𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).card = 𝒜.card := by |
rw [memberSubfamily, nonMemberSubfamily, card_image_of_injOn]
· conv_rhs => rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (fun s => (a ∈ s))]
· apply (erase_injOn' _).mono
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ArithMult
#align_import number_theory.arithmetic_function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Convolution
This file defines arithmetic functions, which are functions from `ℕ` to a specified type that map 0
to 0. In the literature, they are often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. These arithmetic
functions are endowed with a multiplication, given by Dirichlet convolution, and pointwise addition,
to form the Dirichlet ring.
## Main Definitions
* `ArithmeticFunction R` consists of functions `f : ℕ → R` such that `f 0 = 0`.
* An arithmetic function `f` `IsMultiplicative` when `x.coprime y → f (x * y) = f x * f y`.
* The pointwise operations `pmul` and `ppow` differ from the multiplication
and power instances on `ArithmeticFunction R`, which use Dirichlet multiplication.
* `ζ` is the arithmetic function such that `ζ x = 1` for `0 < x`.
* `σ k` is the arithmetic function such that `σ k x = ∑ y ∈ divisors x, y ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `pow k` is the arithmetic function such that `pow k x = x ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `id` is the identity arithmetic function on `ℕ`.
* `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`.
* `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n` counted with multiplicity.
* `μ` is the Möbius function (spelled `moebius` in code).
## Main Results
* Several forms of Möbius inversion:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
* And variants that apply when the equalities only hold on a set `S : Set ℕ` such that
`m ∣ n → n ∈ S → m ∈ S`:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
## Notation
All notation is localized in the namespace `ArithmeticFunction`.
The arithmetic functions `ζ`, `σ`, `ω`, `Ω` and `μ` have Greek letter names.
In addition, there are separate locales `ArithmeticFunction.zeta` for `ζ`,
`ArithmeticFunction.sigma` for `σ`, `ArithmeticFunction.omega` for `ω`,
`ArithmeticFunction.Omega` for `Ω`, and `ArithmeticFunction.Moebius` for `μ`,
to allow for selective access to these notations.
The arithmetic function $$n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$$ is given custom notation
`∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` when applied to `n`.
## Tags
arithmetic functions, dirichlet convolution, divisors
-/
open Finset
open Nat
variable (R : Type*)
/-- An arithmetic function is a function from `ℕ` that maps 0 to 0. In the literature, they are
often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. Multiplication on `ArithmeticFunctions` is by
Dirichlet convolution. -/
def ArithmeticFunction [Zero R] :=
ZeroHom ℕ R
#align nat.arithmetic_function ArithmeticFunction
instance ArithmeticFunction.zero [Zero R] : Zero (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Zero (ZeroHom ℕ R))
instance [Zero R] : Inhabited (ArithmeticFunction R) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZeroHom ℕ R))
variable {R}
namespace ArithmeticFunction
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
-- porting note: used to be `CoeFun`
instance : FunLike (ArithmeticFunction R) ℕ R :=
inferInstanceAs (FunLike (ZeroHom ℕ R) ℕ R)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.toFun = f := rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.to_fun_eq ArithmeticFunction.toFun_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : ℕ → R) (hf) : @DFunLike.coe (ArithmeticFunction R) _ _ _
(ZeroHom.mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f 0 = 0 :=
ZeroHom.map_zero' f
#align nat.arithmetic_function.map_zero ArithmeticFunction.map_zero
theorem coe_inj {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f : ℕ → R) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_inj ArithmeticFunction.coe_inj
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : ℕ} : (0 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
ZeroHom.zero_apply x
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zero_apply ArithmeticFunction.zero_apply
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : ArithmeticFunction R⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
ZeroHom.ext h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ext ArithmeticFunction.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ext_iff ArithmeticFunction.ext_iff
section One
variable [One R]
instance one : One (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨⟨fun x => ite (x = 1) 1 0, rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_apply {x : ℕ} : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = ite (x = 1) 1 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_apply ArithmeticFunction.one_apply
@[simp]
theorem one_one : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_one ArithmeticFunction.one_one
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 1) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
if_neg h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_apply_ne ArithmeticFunction.one_apply_ne
end One
end Zero
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℕ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `natCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe] -- Porting note: added `coe` tag.
def natToArithmeticFunction [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℕ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance natCoe [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℕ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨natToArithmeticFunction⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe ArithmeticFunction.natCoe
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_nat (f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : natToArithmeticFunction f = f :=
ext fun _ => cast_id _
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_nat ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_nat
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_apply [AddMonoidWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_apply ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_apply
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℤ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `intCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def ofInt [AddGroupWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℤ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance intCoe [AddGroupWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℤ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨ofInt⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe ArithmeticFunction.intCoe
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_int (f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ofInt f = f :=
ext fun _ => Int.cast_id
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_int ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_int
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_apply [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x := rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_apply ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
((f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = (f : ArithmeticFunction R) := by
ext
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_coe ArithmeticFunction.coe_coe
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_one ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_one
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_one [AddGroupWithOne R] : ((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) :
ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_one ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_one
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid R]
instance add : Add (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => f n + g n, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} : (f + g) n = f n + g n :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_apply ArithmeticFunction.add_apply
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.zero R,
ArithmeticFunction.add with
add_assoc := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_assoc _ _ _
zero_add := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_add _
add_zero := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_zero _
nsmul := nsmulRec }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_monoid ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid
end AddMonoid
instance instAddMonoidWithOne [AddMonoidWithOne R] : AddMonoidWithOne (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.one with
natCast := fun n => ⟨fun x => if x = 1 then (n : R) else 0, by simp⟩
natCast_zero := by ext; simp
natCast_succ := fun n => by ext x; by_cases h : x = 1 <;> simp [h] }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_monoid_with_one ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with add_comm := fun _ _ => ext fun _ => add_comm _ _ }
instance [NegZeroClass R] : Neg (ArithmeticFunction R) where
neg f := ⟨fun n => -f n, by simp⟩
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with
add_left_neg := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_left_neg _
zsmul := zsmulRec }
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ show AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) by infer_instance with
add_comm := fun _ _ ↦ add_comm _ _ }
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [Zero R] [AddCommMonoid M] [SMul R M]
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance : SMul (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {g : ArithmeticFunction M} {n : ℕ} :
(f • g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.smul_apply ArithmeticFunction.smul_apply
end SMul
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance [Semiring R] : Mul (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨(· • ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} :
(f * g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst * g x.snd :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.mul_apply
theorem mul_apply_one [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f * g) 1 = f 1 * g 1 := by simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_apply_one ArithmeticFunction.mul_apply_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCoe_mul [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = f * g := by
ext n
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_mul ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCoe_mul [Ring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ↑f * g := by
ext n
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_mul ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_mul
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
theorem mul_smul' (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (h : ArithmeticFunction M) :
(f * g) • h = f • g • h := by
ext n
simp only [mul_apply, smul_apply, sum_smul, mul_smul, smul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l * j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i * k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp mul_assoc)
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_smul' ArithmeticFunction.mul_smul'
theorem one_smul' (b : ArithmeticFunction M) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) • b = b := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(1, x)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y1ne : y.fst ≠ 1 := by
intro con
simp only [Con, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, one_mul, Ne] at ymem
simp only [mem_singleton, Prod.ext_iff] at ynmem
-- Porting note: `tauto` worked from here.
cases y
subst con
simp only [true_and, one_mul, x0, not_false_eq_true, and_true] at ynmem ymem
tauto
simp [y1ne]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_smul' ArithmeticFunction.one_smul'
end Module
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ one := One.one
mul := Mul.mul
one_mul := one_smul'
mul_one := fun f => by
ext x
rw [mul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(x, 1)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y2ne : y.snd ≠ 1 := by
intro con
cases y; subst con -- Porting note: added
simp only [Con, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_one, Ne] at ymem
simp only [mem_singleton, Prod.ext_iff] at ynmem
tauto
simp [y2ne]
mul_assoc := mul_smul' }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.monoid ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid
instance instSemiring : Semiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: I reorganized this instance
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne,
ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.instAddCommMonoid with
zero_mul := fun f => by
ext
simp only [mul_apply, zero_mul, sum_const_zero, zero_apply]
mul_zero := fun f => by
ext
simp only [mul_apply, sum_const_zero, mul_zero, zero_apply]
left_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp only [← sum_add_distrib, mul_add, mul_apply, add_apply]
right_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp only [← sum_add_distrib, add_mul, mul_apply, add_apply] }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.semiring ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
ext
rw [mul_apply, ← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, sum_map]
simp [mul_comm] }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
add_left_neg := add_left_neg
mul_comm := mul_comm
zsmul := (· • ·) }
instance {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
Module (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) where
one_smul := one_smul'
mul_smul := mul_smul'
smul_add r x y := by
ext
simp only [sum_add_distrib, smul_add, smul_apply, add_apply]
smul_zero r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, smul_zero, zero_apply]
add_smul r s x := by
ext
simp only [add_smul, sum_add_distrib, smul_apply, add_apply]
zero_smul r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, zero_smul, zero_apply]
section Zeta
/-- `ζ 0 = 0`, otherwise `ζ x = 1`. The Dirichlet Series is the Riemann `ζ`. -/
def zeta : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun x => ite (x = 0) 0 1, rfl⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.zeta] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_apply {x : ℕ} : ζ x = if x = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.zeta_apply
theorem zeta_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 0) : ζ x = 1 :=
if_neg h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_apply_ne ArithmeticFunction.zeta_apply_ne
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]`, LHS not in normal form
theorem coe_zeta_smul_apply {M} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
{f : ArithmeticFunction M} {x : ℕ} :
((↑ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) • f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [smul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.snd
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (left_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, one_smul]
· rw [← map_div_left_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_smul_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_zeta_smul_apply
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]` to make the linter happy.
theorem coe_zeta_mul_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(↑ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_smul_apply
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_zeta_mul_apply
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]` to make the linter happy.
theorem coe_mul_zeta_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [mul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.1
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (right_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, mul_one]
· rw [← map_div_right_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_mul_zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_mul_zeta_apply
theorem zeta_mul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_mul_apply
-- Porting note: was `by rw [← nat_coe_nat ζ, coe_zeta_mul_apply]`. Is this `theorem` obsolete?
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.zeta_mul_apply
theorem mul_zeta_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_mul_zeta_apply
-- Porting note: was `by rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_mul_zeta_apply]`. Is this `theorem` obsolete=
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.mul_zeta_apply
end Zeta
open ArithmeticFunction
section Pmul
/-- This is the pointwise product of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pmul [MulZeroClass R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun x => f x * g x, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul ArithmeticFunction.pmul
@[simp]
theorem pmul_apply [MulZeroClass R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} : f.pmul g x = f x * g x :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_apply ArithmeticFunction.pmul_apply
theorem pmul_comm [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul g = g.pmul f := by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_comm ArithmeticFunction.pmul_comm
lemma pmul_assoc [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f₁ f₂ f₃ : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pmul (pmul f₁ f₂) f₃ = pmul f₁ (pmul f₂ f₃) := by
ext
simp only [pmul_apply, mul_assoc]
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring R]
@[simp]
theorem pmul_zeta (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul ↑ζ = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_zeta ArithmeticFunction.pmul_zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_pmul (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R).pmul f = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_pmul ArithmeticFunction.zeta_pmul
end NonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- This is the pointwise power of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def ppow (f : ArithmeticFunction R) (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
if h0 : k = 0 then ζ else ⟨fun x ↦ f x ^ k, by simp_rw [map_zero, zero_pow h0]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow ArithmeticFunction.ppow
@[simp]
theorem ppow_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f.ppow 0 = ζ := by rw [ppow, dif_pos rfl]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_zero ArithmeticFunction.ppow_zero
@[simp]
theorem ppow_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k x : ℕ} (kpos : 0 < k) : f.ppow k x = f x ^ k := by
rw [ppow, dif_neg (Nat.ne_of_gt kpos)]
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_apply ArithmeticFunction.ppow_apply
theorem ppow_succ' {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} : f.ppow (k + 1) = f.pmul (f.ppow k) := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ']
induction k <;> simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_succ ArithmeticFunction.ppow_succ'
theorem ppow_succ {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} {kpos : 0 < k} :
f.ppow (k + 1) = (f.ppow k).pmul f := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ]
induction k <;> simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_succ' ArithmeticFunction.ppow_succ
end Pmul
section Pdiv
/-- This is the pointwise division of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pdiv [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun n => f n / g n, by simp only [map_zero, ne_eq, not_true, div_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_apply [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (n : ℕ) :
pdiv f g n = f n / g n := rfl
/-- This result only holds for `DivisionSemiring`s instead of `GroupWithZero`s because zeta takes
values in ℕ, and hence the coercion requires an `AddMonoidWithOne`. TODO: Generalise zeta -/
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_zeta [DivisionSemiring R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pdiv f zeta = f := by
ext n
cases n <;> simp [succ_ne_zero]
end Pdiv
section ProdPrimeFactors
/-- The map $n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$ as an arithmetic function -/
def prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) : ArithmeticFunction R where
toFun d := if d = 0 then 0 else ∏ p ∈ d.primeFactors, f p
map_zero' := if_pos rfl
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` is custom notation for `prodPrimeFactors f n` -/
scoped syntax (name := bigproddvd) "∏ᵖ " extBinder " ∣ " term ", " term:67 : term
scoped macro_rules (kind := bigproddvd)
| `(∏ᵖ $x:ident ∣ $n, $r) => `(prodPrimeFactors (fun $x ↦ $r) $n)
@[simp]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f: ℕ → R} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p :=
if_neg hn
end ProdPrimeFactors
/-- Multiplicative functions -/
def IsMultiplicative [MonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : Prop :=
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative
namespace IsMultiplicative
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R]
@[simp, arith_mult]
theorem map_one {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h : f.IsMultiplicative) : f 1 = 1 :=
h.1
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_one ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_one
@[simp]
theorem map_mul_of_coprime {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m.Coprime n) : f (m * n) = f m * f n :=
hf.2 h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime
end MonoidWithZero
theorem map_prod {ι : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (g : ι → ℕ) {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (s : Finset ι) (hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Coprime on g)) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih hs
· simp [hf]
rw [coe_insert, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (Coprime.symmetric.comap g)] at hs
rw [prod_insert has, prod_insert has, hf.map_mul_of_coprime, ih hs.1]
exact .prod_right fun i hi => hs.2 _ hi (hi.ne_of_not_mem has).symm
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_prod ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_prod
theorem map_prod_of_prime [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : ∀ p ∈ t, p.Prime) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod _ h_mult t fun x hx y hy hxy => (coprime_primes (ht x hx) (ht y hy)).mpr hxy
theorem map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f) (l : ℕ)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : t ⊆ l.primeFactors) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod_of_prime h_mult t fun _ a => prime_of_mem_primeFactors (ht a)
@[arith_mult]
theorem natCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} [Semiring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: was `by simp [cop, h]`
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.nat_cast ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast := natCast
@[arith_mult]
theorem intCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} [Ring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: was `by simp [cop, h]`
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.int_cast ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast := intCast
@[arith_mult]
theorem mul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f * g) := by
refine ⟨by simp [hf.1, hg.1], ?_⟩
simp only [mul_apply]
intro m n cop
rw [sum_mul_sum, ← sum_product']
symm
apply sum_nbij fun ((i, j), k, l) ↦ (i * k, j * l)
· rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ h
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Nat.mul_eq_zero, Ne]
constructor
· ring
rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero] at *
apply not_or_of_not ha hb
· simp only [Set.InjOn, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product, Prod.mk.inj_iff]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩ ⟨⟨c1, c2⟩, ⟨d1, d2⟩⟩ hcd h
simp only [Prod.mk.inj_iff] at h
ext <;> dsimp only
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one,
mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.2, mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.1, mul_comm c1 d1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_right, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one,
one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.2, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· simp only [Set.SurjOn, Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product,
Set.mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk.inj_iff]
rintro ⟨b1, b2⟩ h
dsimp at h
use ((b1.gcd m, b2.gcd m), (b1.gcd n, b2.gcd n))
rw [← cop.gcd_mul _, ← cop.gcd_mul _, ← h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop h.1,
Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop.symm _]
· rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp [h.2.1, h.2.2]
rw [mul_comm n m, h.1]
· simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
dsimp only
rw [hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_right_right,
hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_left_right]
ring
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.mul ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.mul
@[arith_mult]
theorem pmul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f.pmul g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pmul_apply, hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop, hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop]
ring⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.pmul ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.pmul
@[arith_mult]
theorem pdiv [CommGroupWithZero R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : IsMultiplicative f)
(hg : IsMultiplicative g) : IsMultiplicative (pdiv f g) :=
⟨ by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pdiv_apply, map_mul_of_coprime hf cop, map_mul_of_coprime hg cop,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv]
apply mul_mul_mul_comm ⟩
/-- For any multiplicative function `f` and any `n > 0`,
we can evaluate `f n` by evaluating `f` at `p ^ k` over the factorization of `n` -/
nonrec -- Porting note: added
theorem multiplicative_factorization [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => f (p ^ k) :=
multiplicative_factorization f (fun _ _ => hf.2) hf.1 hn
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.multiplicative_factorization ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.multiplicative_factorization
/-- A recapitulation of the definition of multiplicative that is simpler for proofs -/
theorem iff_ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} :
IsMultiplicative f ↔
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≠ 0 → n ≠ 0 → m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n := by
refine and_congr_right' (forall₂_congr fun m n => ⟨fun h _ _ => h, fun h hmn => ?_⟩)
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
exact h hm hn hmn
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.iff_ne_zero ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero
/-- Two multiplicative functions `f` and `g` are equal if and only if
they agree on prime powers -/
theorem eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (g : ArithmeticFunction R) (hg : g.IsMultiplicative) :
f = g ↔ ∀ p i : ℕ, Nat.Prime p → f (p ^ i) = g (p ^ i) := by
constructor
· intro h p i _
rw [h]
intro h
ext n
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero]
rw [multiplicative_factorization f hf hn, multiplicative_factorization g hg hn]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun p hp ↦ h p _ (Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers
@[arith_mult]
theorem prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) :
IsMultiplicative (prodPrimeFactors f) := by
rw [iff_ne_zero]
simp only [ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, prodPrimeFactors_apply, primeFactors_one,
prod_empty, true_and]
intro x y hx hy hxy
have hxy₀ : x * y ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hx hy
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hxy₀, prodPrimeFactors_apply hx, prodPrimeFactors_apply hy,
Nat.primeFactors_mul hx hy, ← Finset.prod_union hxy.disjoint_primeFactors]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) (hg : IsMultiplicative g) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, (f + g) p = (f * g) n := by
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero]
simp_rw [add_apply (f:=f) (g:=g)]
rw [Finset.prod_add, mul_apply, sum_divisorsAntidiagonal (f · * g ·),
← divisors_filter_squarefree_of_squarefree hn, sum_divisors_filter_squarefree hn.ne_zero,
factors_eq]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro t ht
rw [t.prod_val, Function.id_def,
← prod_primeFactors_sdiff_of_squarefree hn (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
hf.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n t (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
← hg.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n (_ \ t) Finset.sdiff_subset]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ArithmeticFunction.lean | 813 | 838 | theorem lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} :
f (x.lcm y) * f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y := by |
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp only [hx, f.map_zero, zero_mul, Nat.lcm_zero_left, Nat.gcd_zero_left]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp only [hy, f.map_zero, mul_zero, Nat.lcm_zero_right, Nat.gcd_zero_right, zero_mul]
have hgcd_ne_zero : x.gcd y ≠ 0 := gcd_ne_zero_left hx
have hlcm_ne_zero : x.lcm y ≠ 0 := lcm_ne_zero hx hy
have hfi_zero : ∀ {i}, f (i ^ 0) = 1 := by
intro i; rw [Nat.pow_zero, hf.1]
iterate 4 rw [hf.multiplicative_factorization f (by assumption),
Finsupp.prod_of_support_subset _ _ _ (fun _ _ => hfi_zero)
(s := (x.primeFactors ⊔ y.primeFactors))]
· rw [← Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro p _
rcases Nat.le_or_le (x.factorization p) (y.factorization p) with h | h <;>
simp only [factorization_lcm hx hy, ge_iff_le, Finsupp.sup_apply, h, sup_of_le_right,
sup_of_le_left, inf_of_le_right, Nat.factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.inf_apply,
inf_of_le_left, mul_comm]
· apply Finset.subset_union_right
· apply Finset.subset_union_left
· rw [factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.support_inf, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.inter_subset_union
· simp [factorization_lcm hx hy]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BallAction
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Calculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.Algebra.LieGroup
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Real
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Basic
#align_import geometry.manifold.instances.sphere from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0dc4079202c28226b2841a51eb6d3cc2135bb80f"
/-!
# Manifold structure on the sphere
This file defines stereographic projection from the sphere in an inner product space `E`, and uses
it to put a smooth manifold structure on the sphere.
## Main results
For a unit vector `v` in `E`, the definition `stereographic` gives the stereographic projection
centred at `v`, a partial homeomorphism from the sphere to `(ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ` (the orthogonal complement of
`v`).
For finite-dimensional `E`, we then construct a smooth manifold instance on the sphere; the charts
here are obtained by composing the partial homeomorphisms `stereographic` with arbitrary isometries
from `(ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ` to Euclidean space.
We prove two lemmas about smooth maps:
* `contMDiff_coe_sphere` states that the coercion map from the sphere into `E` is smooth;
this is a useful tool for constructing smooth maps *from* the sphere.
* `contMDiff.codRestrict_sphere` states that a map from a manifold into the sphere is
smooth if its lift to a map to `E` is smooth; this is a useful tool for constructing smooth maps
*to* the sphere.
As an application we prove `contMdiffNegSphere`, that the antipodal map is smooth.
Finally, we equip the `circle` (defined in `Analysis.Complex.Circle` to be the sphere in `ℂ`
centred at `0` of radius `1`) with the following structure:
* a charted space with model space `EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin 1)` (inherited from `Metric.Sphere`)
* a Lie group with model with corners `𝓡 1`
We furthermore show that `expMapCircle` (defined in `Analysis.Complex.Circle` to be the natural
map `fun t ↦ exp (t * I)` from `ℝ` to `circle`) is smooth.
## Implementation notes
The model space for the charted space instance is `EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)`, where `n` is a
natural number satisfying the typeclass assumption `[Fact (finrank ℝ E = n + 1)]`. This may seem a
little awkward, but it is designed to circumvent the problem that the literal expression for the
dimension of the model space (up to definitional equality) determines the type. If one used the
naive expression `EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin (finrank ℝ E - 1))` for the model space, then the sphere in
`ℂ` would be a manifold with model space `EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin (2 - 1))` but not with model space
`EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin 1)`.
## TODO
Relate the stereographic projection to the inversion of the space.
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
noncomputable section
open Metric FiniteDimensional Function
open scoped Manifold
section StereographicProjection
variable (v : E)
/-! ### Construction of the stereographic projection -/
/-- Stereographic projection, forward direction. This is a map from an inner product space `E` to
the orthogonal complement of an element `v` of `E`. It is smooth away from the affine hyperplane
through `v` parallel to the orthogonal complement. It restricts on the sphere to the stereographic
projection. -/
def stereoToFun (x : E) : (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ :=
(2 / ((1 : ℝ) - innerSL ℝ v x)) • orthogonalProjection (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ x
#align stereo_to_fun stereoToFun
variable {v}
@[simp]
theorem stereoToFun_apply (x : E) :
stereoToFun v x = (2 / ((1 : ℝ) - innerSL ℝ v x)) • orthogonalProjection (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ x :=
rfl
#align stereo_to_fun_apply stereoToFun_apply
theorem contDiffOn_stereoToFun :
ContDiffOn ℝ ⊤ (stereoToFun v) {x : E | innerSL _ v x ≠ (1 : ℝ)} := by
refine ContDiffOn.smul ?_ (orthogonalProjection (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ).contDiff.contDiffOn
refine contDiff_const.contDiffOn.div ?_ ?_
· exact (contDiff_const.sub (innerSL ℝ v).contDiff).contDiffOn
· intro x h h'
exact h (sub_eq_zero.mp h').symm
#align cont_diff_on_stereo_to_fun contDiffOn_stereoToFun
theorem continuousOn_stereoToFun :
ContinuousOn (stereoToFun v) {x : E | innerSL _ v x ≠ (1 : ℝ)} :=
contDiffOn_stereoToFun.continuousOn
#align continuous_on_stereo_to_fun continuousOn_stereoToFun
variable (v)
/-- Auxiliary function for the construction of the reverse direction of the stereographic
projection. This is a map from the orthogonal complement of a unit vector `v` in an inner product
space `E` to `E`; we will later prove that it takes values in the unit sphere.
For most purposes, use `stereoInvFun`, not `stereoInvFunAux`. -/
def stereoInvFunAux (w : E) : E :=
(‖w‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ • ((4 : ℝ) • w + (‖w‖ ^ 2 - 4) • v)
#align stereo_inv_fun_aux stereoInvFunAux
variable {v}
@[simp]
theorem stereoInvFunAux_apply (w : E) :
stereoInvFunAux v w = (‖w‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ • ((4 : ℝ) • w + (‖w‖ ^ 2 - 4) • v) :=
rfl
#align stereo_inv_fun_aux_apply stereoInvFunAux_apply
theorem stereoInvFunAux_mem (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) {w : E} (hw : w ∈ (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ) :
stereoInvFunAux v w ∈ sphere (0 : E) 1 := by
have h₁ : (0 : ℝ) < ‖w‖ ^ 2 + 4 := by positivity
suffices ‖(4 : ℝ) • w + (‖w‖ ^ 2 - 4) • v‖ = ‖w‖ ^ 2 + 4 by
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_inv, this,
abs_of_pos h₁, stereoInvFunAux_apply, inv_mul_cancel h₁.ne']
suffices ‖(4 : ℝ) • w + (‖w‖ ^ 2 - 4) • v‖ ^ 2 = (‖w‖ ^ 2 + 4) ^ 2 by
simpa [sq_eq_sq_iff_abs_eq_abs, abs_of_pos h₁] using this
rw [Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left] at hw
simp [norm_add_sq_real, norm_smul, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, hw, mul_pow,
Real.norm_eq_abs, hv]
ring
#align stereo_inv_fun_aux_mem stereoInvFunAux_mem
theorem hasFDerivAt_stereoInvFunAux (v : E) :
HasFDerivAt (stereoInvFunAux v) (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ E) 0 := by
have h₀ : HasFDerivAt (fun w : E => ‖w‖ ^ 2) (0 : E →L[ℝ] ℝ) 0 := by
convert (hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq (0 : E)).hasFDerivAt
simp
have h₁ : HasFDerivAt (fun w : E => (‖w‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹) (0 : E →L[ℝ] ℝ) 0 := by
convert (hasFDerivAt_inv _).comp _ (h₀.add (hasFDerivAt_const 4 0)) <;> simp
have h₂ : HasFDerivAt (fun w => (4 : ℝ) • w + (‖w‖ ^ 2 - 4) • v)
((4 : ℝ) • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ E) 0 := by
convert ((hasFDerivAt_const (4 : ℝ) 0).smul (hasFDerivAt_id 0)).add
((h₀.sub (hasFDerivAt_const (4 : ℝ) 0)).smul (hasFDerivAt_const v 0)) using 1
ext w
simp
convert h₁.smul h₂ using 1
ext w
simp
#align has_fderiv_at_stereo_inv_fun_aux hasFDerivAt_stereoInvFunAux
theorem hasFDerivAt_stereoInvFunAux_comp_coe (v : E) :
HasFDerivAt (stereoInvFunAux v ∘ ((↑) : (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ → E)) (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ.subtypeL 0 := by
have : HasFDerivAt (stereoInvFunAux v) (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ E) ((ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ.subtypeL 0) :=
hasFDerivAt_stereoInvFunAux v
convert this.comp (0 : (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ) (by apply ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt)
#align has_fderiv_at_stereo_inv_fun_aux_comp_coe hasFDerivAt_stereoInvFunAux_comp_coe
theorem contDiff_stereoInvFunAux : ContDiff ℝ ⊤ (stereoInvFunAux v) := by
have h₀ : ContDiff ℝ ⊤ fun w : E => ‖w‖ ^ 2 := contDiff_norm_sq ℝ
have h₁ : ContDiff ℝ ⊤ fun w : E => (‖w‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ := by
refine (h₀.add contDiff_const).inv ?_
intro x
nlinarith
have h₂ : ContDiff ℝ ⊤ fun w => (4 : ℝ) • w + (‖w‖ ^ 2 - 4) • v := by
refine (contDiff_const.smul contDiff_id).add ?_
exact (h₀.sub contDiff_const).smul contDiff_const
exact h₁.smul h₂
#align cont_diff_stereo_inv_fun_aux contDiff_stereoInvFunAux
/-- Stereographic projection, reverse direction. This is a map from the orthogonal complement of a
unit vector `v` in an inner product space `E` to the unit sphere in `E`. -/
def stereoInvFun (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ) : sphere (0 : E) 1 :=
⟨stereoInvFunAux v (w : E), stereoInvFunAux_mem hv w.2⟩
#align stereo_inv_fun stereoInvFun
@[simp]
theorem stereoInvFun_apply (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ) :
(stereoInvFun hv w : E) = (‖w‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ • ((4 : ℝ) • w + (‖w‖ ^ 2 - 4) • v) :=
rfl
#align stereo_inv_fun_apply stereoInvFun_apply
theorem stereoInvFun_ne_north_pole (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ) :
stereoInvFun hv w ≠ (⟨v, by simp [hv]⟩ : sphere (0 : E) 1) := by
refine Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 ?_
rw [← inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one _ hv]
· have hw : ⟪v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.mp w.2
have hw' : (‖(w : E)‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ * (‖(w : E)‖ ^ 2 - 4) < 1 := by
refine (inv_mul_lt_iff' ?_).mpr ?_
· nlinarith
linarith
simpa [real_inner_comm, inner_add_right, inner_smul_right, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, hw,
hv] using hw'
· simpa using stereoInvFunAux_mem hv w.2
#align stereo_inv_fun_ne_north_pole stereoInvFun_ne_north_pole
theorem continuous_stereoInvFun (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) : Continuous (stereoInvFun hv) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 (contDiff_stereoInvFunAux.continuous.comp continuous_subtype_val)
#align continuous_stereo_inv_fun continuous_stereoInvFun
theorem stereo_left_inv (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) {x : sphere (0 : E) 1} (hx : (x : E) ≠ v) :
stereoInvFun hv (stereoToFun v x) = x := by
ext
simp only [stereoToFun_apply, stereoInvFun_apply, smul_add]
-- name two frequently-occuring quantities and write down their basic properties
set a : ℝ := innerSL _ v x
set y := orthogonalProjection (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ x
have split : ↑x = a • v + ↑y := by
convert (orthogonalProjection_add_orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (ℝ ∙ v) x).symm
exact (orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton ℝ hv x).symm
have hvy : ⟪v, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.mp y.2
have pythag : 1 = a ^ 2 + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have hvy' : ⟪a • v, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by simp only [inner_smul_left, hvy, mul_zero]
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero _ _ hvy' using 2
· simp [← split]
· simp [norm_smul, hv, ← sq, sq_abs]
· exact sq _
-- two facts which will be helpful for clearing denominators in the main calculation
have ha : 1 - a ≠ 0 := by
have : a < 1 := (inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one hv (by simp)).mpr hx.symm
linarith
-- the core of the problem is these two algebraic identities:
have h₁ : (2 ^ 2 / (1 - a) ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ * 4 * (2 / (1 - a)) = 1 := by
field_simp; simp only [Submodule.coe_norm] at *; nlinarith
have h₂ : (2 ^ 2 / (1 - a) ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ * (2 ^ 2 / (1 - a) ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 - 4) = a := by
field_simp
transitivity (1 - a) ^ 2 * (a * (2 ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 + 4 * (1 - a) ^ 2))
· congr
simp only [Submodule.coe_norm] at *
nlinarith
ring!
convert
congr_arg₂ Add.add (congr_arg (fun t => t • (y : E)) h₁) (congr_arg (fun t => t • v) h₂) using 1
· simp [a, inner_add_right, inner_smul_right, hvy, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, hv, mul_smul,
mul_pow, Real.norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, norm_smul]
-- Porting note: used to be simp only [split, add_comm] but get maxRec errors
rw [split, add_comm]
ac_rfl
-- Porting note: this branch did not exit in ml3
· rw [split, add_comm]
congr!
dsimp
rw [one_smul]
#align stereo_left_inv stereo_left_inv
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/Instances/Sphere.lean | 257 | 268 | theorem stereo_right_inv (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ) : stereoToFun v (stereoInvFun hv w) = w := by |
have : 2 / (1 - (‖(w : E)‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ * (‖(w : E)‖ ^ 2 - 4)) * (‖(w : E)‖ ^ 2 + 4)⁻¹ * 4 = 1 := by
field_simp; ring
convert congr_arg (· • w) this
· have h₁ : orthogonalProjection (ℝ ∙ v)ᗮ v = 0 :=
orthogonalProjection_orthogonalComplement_singleton_eq_zero v
-- Porting note: was innerSL _ and now just inner
have h₃ : inner v w = (0 : ℝ) := Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.mp w.2
-- Porting note: was innerSL _ and now just inner
have h₄ : inner v v = (1 : ℝ) := by simp [real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, hv]
simp [h₁, h₃, h₄, ContinuousLinearMap.map_add, ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul, mul_smul]
· simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import order.filter.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
## Main definitions
* `Filter` : filters on a set;
* `Filter.principal` : filter of all sets containing a given set;
* `Filter.map`, `Filter.comap` : operations on filters;
* `Filter.Tendsto` : limit with respect to filters;
* `Filter.Eventually` : `f.eventually p` means `{x | p x} ∈ f`;
* `Filter.Frequently` : `f.frequently p` means `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`;
* `filter_upwards [h₁, ..., hₙ]` :
a tactic that takes a list of proofs `hᵢ : sᵢ ∈ f`,
and replaces a goal `s ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ s₁ → ... → x ∈ sₙ → x ∈ s`;
* `Filter.NeBot f` : a utility class stating that `f` is a non-trivial filter.
Filters on a type `X` are sets of sets of `X` satisfying three conditions. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
In this file, we define the type `Filter X` of filters on `X`, and endow it with a complete lattice
structure. This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The general notion of limit of a map with respect to filters on the source and target types
is `Filter.Tendsto`. It is defined in terms of the order and the push-forward operation.
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
For instance, anticipating on Topology.Basic, the statement: "if a sequence `u` converges to
some `x` and `u n` belongs to a set `M` for `n` large enough then `x` is in the closure of
`M`" is formalized as: `Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) → (∀ᶠ n in atTop, u n ∈ M) → x ∈ closure M`,
which is a special case of `mem_closure_of_tendsto` from Topology.Basic.
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set Order
open scoped Classical
universe u v w x y
/-- A filter `F` on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. We do not forbid this collection to be
all sets of `α`. -/
structure Filter (α : Type*) where
/-- The set of sets that belong to the filter. -/
sets : Set (Set α)
/-- The set `Set.univ` belongs to any filter. -/
univ_sets : Set.univ ∈ sets
/-- If a set belongs to a filter, then its superset belongs to the filter as well. -/
sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets
/-- If two sets belong to a filter, then their intersection belongs to the filter as well. -/
inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets
#align filter Filter
/-- If `F` is a filter on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ F` as on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*} : Membership (Set α) (Filter α) :=
⟨fun U F => U ∈ F.sets⟩
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_mk {t : Set (Set α)} {h₁ h₂ h₃} : s ∈ mk t h₁ h₂ h₃ ↔ s ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_mk Filter.mem_mk
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_sets : s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sets Filter.mem_sets
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
#align filter.inhabited_mem Filter.inhabitedMem
theorem filter_eq : ∀ {f g : Filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align filter.filter_eq Filter.filter_eq
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
#align filter.filter_eq_iff Filter.filter_eq_iff
protected theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g := by
simp only [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff, Filter.mem_sets]
#align filter.ext_iff Filter.ext_iff
@[ext]
protected theorem ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g) → f = g :=
Filter.ext_iff.2
#align filter.ext Filter.ext
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
#align filter.coext Filter.coext
@[simp]
theorem univ_mem : univ ∈ f :=
f.univ_sets
#align filter.univ_mem Filter.univ_mem
theorem mem_of_superset {x y : Set α} (hx : x ∈ f) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : y ∈ f :=
f.sets_of_superset hx hxy
#align filter.mem_of_superset Filter.mem_of_superset
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
theorem inter_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : s ∩ t ∈ f :=
f.inter_sets hs ht
#align filter.inter_mem Filter.inter_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_iff Filter.inter_mem_iff
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.diff_mem Filter.diff_mem
theorem univ_mem' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s) : s ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset univ_mem fun x _ => h x
#align filter.univ_mem' Filter.univ_mem'
theorem mp_mem (hs : s ∈ f) (h : { x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t } ∈ f) : t ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hs h) fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ h₁
#align filter.mp_mem Filter.mp_mem
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
#align filter.congr_sets Filter.congr_sets
/-- Override `sets` field of a filter to provide better definitional equality. -/
protected def copy (f : Filter α) (S : Set (Set α)) (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : Filter α where
sets := S
univ_sets := (hmem _).2 univ_mem
sets_of_superset h hsub := (hmem _).2 <| mem_of_superset ((hmem _).1 h) hsub
inter_sets h₁ h₂ := (hmem _).2 <| inter_mem ((hmem _).1 h₁) ((hmem _).1 h₂)
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
@[simp] lemma mem_copy {S hmem} : s ∈ f.copy S hmem ↔ s ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem biInter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Finite) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
Finite.induction_on hf (by simp) fun _ _ hs => by simp [hs]
#align filter.bInter_mem Filter.biInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem biInter_finset_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} (is : Finset β) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
biInter_mem is.finite_toSet
#align filter.bInter_finset_mem Filter.biInter_finset_mem
alias _root_.Finset.iInter_mem_sets := biInter_finset_mem
#align finset.Inter_mem_sets Finset.iInter_mem_sets
-- attribute [protected] Finset.iInter_mem_sets porting note: doesn't work
@[simp]
theorem sInter_mem {s : Set (Set α)} (hfin : s.Finite) : ⋂₀ s ∈ f ↔ ∀ U ∈ s, U ∈ f := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem hfin]
#align filter.sInter_mem Filter.sInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem iInter_mem {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Finite β] : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f :=
(sInter_mem (finite_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align filter.Inter_mem Filter.iInter_mem
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_subset_iff Filter.exists_mem_subset_iff
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
#align filter.monotone_mem Filter.monotone_mem
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_and_iff Filter.exists_mem_and_iff
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
#align filter.forall_in_swap Filter.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
/--
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f` and terms
`h₁ : t₁ ∈ f, ⋯, hₙ : tₙ ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ t₁ → ⋯ → x ∈ tₙ → x ∈ s`.
The list is an optional parameter, `[]` being its default value.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ], intros a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ }`.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] using e` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
Combining both shortcuts is done by writing `filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ using e`.
Note that in this case, the `aᵢ` terms can be used in `e`.
-/
syntax (name := filterUpwards) "filter_upwards" (" [" term,* "]")?
(" with" (ppSpace colGt term:max)*)? (" using " term)? : tactic
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| filter_upwards $[[$[$args],*]]? $[with $wth*]? $[using $usingArg]?) => do
let config : ApplyConfig := {newGoals := ApplyNewGoals.nonDependentOnly}
for e in args.getD #[] |>.reverse do
let goal ← getMainGoal
replaceMainGoal <| ← goal.withContext <| runTermElab do
let m ← mkFreshExprMVar none
let lem ← Term.elabTermEnsuringType
(← ``(Filter.mp_mem $e $(← Term.exprToSyntax m))) (← goal.getType)
goal.assign lem
return [m.mvarId!]
liftMetaTactic fun goal => do
goal.apply (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels ``Filter.univ_mem') config
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| dsimp (config := {zeta := false}) only [Set.mem_setOf_eq])
if let some l := wth then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| intro $[$l]*)
if let some e := usingArg then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| exact $e)
end Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
section Principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : Set α) : Filter α where
sets := { t | s ⊆ t }
univ_sets := subset_univ s
sets_of_superset hx := Subset.trans hx
inter_sets := subset_inter
#align filter.principal Filter.principal
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "𝓟" => Filter.principal
@[simp] theorem mem_principal {s t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓟 t ↔ t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal Filter.mem_principal
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal_self Filter.mem_principal_self
end Principal
open Filter
section Join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : Filter (Filter α)) : Filter α where
sets := { s | { t : Filter α | s ∈ t } ∈ f }
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, univ_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, setOf_true]
sets_of_superset hx xy := mem_of_superset hx fun f h => mem_of_superset h xy
inter_sets hx hy := mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx hy) fun f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => inter_mem h₁ h₂
#align filter.join Filter.join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {s : Set α} {f : Filter (Filter α)} : s ∈ join f ↔ { t | s ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_join Filter.mem_join
end Join
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance : PartialOrder (Filter α) where
le f g := ∀ ⦃U : Set α⦄, U ∈ g → U ∈ f
le_antisymm a b h₁ h₂ := filter_eq <| Subset.antisymm h₂ h₁
le_refl a := Subset.rfl
le_trans a b c h₁ h₂ := Subset.trans h₂ h₁
theorem le_def : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g, x ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.le_def Filter.le_def
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align filter.not_le Filter.not_le
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
#align filter.generate_sets Filter.GenerateSets
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
#align filter.generate Filter.generate
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
#align filter.sets_iff_generate Filter.le_generate_iff
theorem mem_generate_iff {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} :
U ∈ generate s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, Set.Finite t ∧ ⋂₀ t ⊆ U := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction h with
| @basic V V_in =>
exact ⟨{V}, singleton_subset_iff.2 V_in, finite_singleton _, (sInter_singleton _).subset⟩
| univ => exact ⟨∅, empty_subset _, finite_empty, subset_univ _⟩
| superset _ hVW hV =>
rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, ht, htV.trans hVW⟩
| inter _ _ hV hW =>
rcases hV, hW with ⟨⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩, u, hus, hu, huW⟩
exact
⟨t ∪ u, union_subset hts hus, ht.union hu,
(sInter_union _ _).subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter htV huW⟩
· rcases h with ⟨t, hts, tfin, h⟩
exact mem_of_superset ((sInter_mem tfin).2 fun V hV => GenerateSets.basic <| hts hV) h
#align filter.mem_generate_iff Filter.mem_generate_iff
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
#align filter.mk_of_closure Filter.mkOfClosure
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.mk_of_closure_sets Filter.mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
#align filter.gi_generate Filter.giGenerate
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : Inf (Filter α) :=
⟨fun f g : Filter α =>
{ sets := { s | ∃ a ∈ f, ∃ b ∈ g, s = a ∩ b }
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem, _, univ_mem, by simp⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ xy
refine
⟨a ∪ y, mem_of_superset ha subset_union_left, b ∪ y,
mem_of_superset hb subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_union_distrib_right, union_eq_self_of_subset_left xy]
inter_sets := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a ∩ c, inter_mem ha hc, b ∩ d, inter_mem hb hd, ?_⟩
ac_rfl }⟩
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_inf_iff Filter.mem_inf_iff
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_left Filter.mem_inf_of_left
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_right Filter.mem_inf_of_right
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_inf Filter.inter_mem_inf
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
#align filter.mem_inf_of_inter Filter.mem_inf_of_inter
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_iff_superset Filter.mem_inf_iff_superset
instance : Top (Filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := { s | ∀ x, x ∈ s }
univ_sets := fun x => mem_univ x
sets_of_superset := fun hx hxy a => hxy (hx a)
inter_sets := fun hx hy _ => mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
theorem mem_top_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_top_iff_forall Filter.mem_top_iff_forall
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ s = univ := by
rw [mem_top_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.mem_top Filter.mem_top
section CompleteLattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for some lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) :=
{ @OrderDual.instCompleteLattice _ (giGenerate α).liftCompleteLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _s hs => (mem_top.1 hs).symm ▸ univ_mem
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
sSup := join ∘ 𝓟
le_sSup := fun _ _f hf _s hs => hs hf
sSup_le := fun _ _f hf _s hs _g hg => hf _ hg hs }
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
/-- A filter is `NeBot` if it is not equal to `⊥`, or equivalently the empty set does not belong to
the filter. Bourbaki include this assumption in the definition of a filter but we prefer to have a
`CompleteLattice` structure on `Filter _`, so we use a typeclass argument in lemmas instead. -/
class NeBot (f : Filter α) : Prop where
/-- The filter is nontrivial: `f ≠ ⊥` or equivalently, `∅ ∉ f`. -/
ne' : f ≠ ⊥
#align filter.ne_bot Filter.NeBot
theorem neBot_iff {f : Filter α} : NeBot f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align filter.ne_bot_iff Filter.neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
#align filter.ne_bot.ne Filter.NeBot.ne
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
#align filter.not_ne_bot Filter.not_neBot
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.mono Filter.NeBot.mono
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
#align filter.ne_bot_of_le Filter.neBot_of_le
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.sup_ne_bot Filter.sup_neBot
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
#align filter.not_disjoint_self_iff Filter.not_disjoint_self_iff
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
#align filter.bot_sets_eq Filter.bot_sets_eq
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
#align filter.sup_sets_eq Filter.sup_sets_eq
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
#align filter.Sup_sets_eq Filter.sSup_sets_eq
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
#align filter.supr_sets_eq Filter.iSup_sets_eq
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
#align filter.generate_empty Filter.generate_empty
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
#align filter.generate_univ Filter.generate_univ
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
#align filter.generate_union Filter.generate_union
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
#align filter.generate_Union Filter.generate_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : Filter α) :=
trivial
#align filter.mem_bot Filter.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sup Filter.mem_sup
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
#align filter.union_mem_sup Filter.union_mem_sup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {x : Set α} {s : Set (Filter α)} : x ∈ sSup s ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, x ∈ (f : Filter α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_Sup Filter.mem_sSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter]
#align filter.mem_supr Filter.mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
#align filter.supr_ne_bot Filter.iSup_neBot
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
show generate _ = generate _ from congr_arg _ <| congr_arg sSup <| (range_comp _ _).symm
#align filter.infi_eq_generate Filter.iInf_eq_generate
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
#align filter.mem_infi_of_mem Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem
theorem mem_iInf_of_iInter {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} {I : Set ι} (I_fin : I.Finite)
{V : I → Set α} (hV : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i) (hU : ⋂ i, V i ⊆ U) : U ∈ ⨅ i, s i := by
haveI := I_fin.fintype
refine mem_of_superset (iInter_mem.2 fun i => ?_) hU
exact mem_iInf_of_mem (i : ι) (hV _)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_Inter Filter.mem_iInf_of_iInter
theorem mem_iInf {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔ ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : I → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
constructor
· rw [iInf_eq_generate, mem_generate_iff]
rintro ⟨t, tsub, tfin, tinter⟩
rcases eq_finite_iUnion_of_finite_subset_iUnion tfin tsub with ⟨I, Ifin, σ, σfin, σsub, rfl⟩
rw [sInter_iUnion] at tinter
set V := fun i => U ∪ ⋂₀ σ i with hV
have V_in : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i := by
rintro i
have : ⋂₀ σ i ∈ s i := by
rw [sInter_mem (σfin _)]
apply σsub
exact mem_of_superset this subset_union_right
refine ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, ?_⟩
rwa [hV, ← union_iInter, union_eq_self_of_subset_right]
· rintro ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInf_of_iInter Ifin V_in Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_infi Filter.mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf' {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔
∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : ι → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧
(∀ i ∉ I, V i = univ) ∧ (U = ⋂ i ∈ I, V i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
simp only [mem_iInf, SetCoe.forall', biInter_eq_iInter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨I, If, V, hVs, _, hVU, _⟩ => ⟨I, If, fun i => V i, fun i => hVs i, hVU⟩⟩
rintro ⟨I, If, V, hV, rfl⟩
refine ⟨I, If, fun i => if hi : i ∈ I then V ⟨i, hi⟩ else univ, fun i => ?_, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [hV _, univ_mem]
· exact dif_neg hi
· simp only [iInter_dite, biInter_eq_iInter, dif_pos (Subtype.coe_prop _), Subtype.coe_eta,
iInter_univ, inter_univ, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
#align filter.mem_infi' Filter.mem_iInf'
theorem exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} {s}
(hs : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) : ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i :=
let ⟨_, _, V, hVs, _, _, hVU'⟩ := mem_iInf'.1 hs; ⟨V, hVs, hVU'⟩
#align filter.exists_Inter_of_mem_infi Filter.exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf_of_finite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
(s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i := by
refine ⟨exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun i => mem_iInf_of_mem i (ht i)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_finite Filter.mem_iInf_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
#align filter.le_principal_iff Filter.le_principal_iff
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
#align filter.Iic_principal Filter.Iic_principal
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, iff_self_iff, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_mono Filter.principal_mono
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
#align filter.monotone_principal Filter.monotone_principal
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
#align filter.principal_eq_iff_eq Filter.principal_eq_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
#align filter.join_principal_eq_Sup Filter.join_principal_eq_sSup
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.principal_univ Filter.principal_univ
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
#align filter.principal_empty Filter.principal_empty
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
#align filter.generate_eq_binfi Filter.generate_eq_biInf
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
#align filter.empty_mem_iff_bot Filter.empty_mem_iff_bot
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
#align filter.nonempty_of_mem Filter.nonempty_of_mem
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
#align filter.ne_bot.nonempty_of_mem Filter.NeBot.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
#align filter.empty_not_mem Filter.empty_not_mem
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
#align filter.nonempty_of_ne_bot Filter.nonempty_of_neBot
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
#align filter.compl_not_mem Filter.compl_not_mem
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
#align filter.filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty Filter.filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
#align filter.disjoint_iff Filter.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem Filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.not_disjoint Filter.NeBot.not_disjoint
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
#align filter.inf_eq_bot_iff Filter.inf_eq_bot_iff
theorem _root_.Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {l : ι → Filter α}
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on l)) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on s) := by
have : Pairwise fun i j => ∃ (s : {s // s ∈ l i}) (t : {t // t ∈ l j}), Disjoint s.1 t.1 := by
simpa only [Pairwise, Function.onFun, Filter.disjoint_iff, exists_prop, Subtype.exists] using hd
choose! s t hst using this
refine ⟨fun i => ⋂ j, @s i j ∩ @t j i, fun i => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exacts [iInter_mem.2 fun j => inter_mem (@s i j).2 (@t j i).2,
(hst hij).mono ((iInter_subset _ j).trans inter_subset_left)
((iInter_subset _ i).trans inter_subset_right)]
#align pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter {ι : Type*} {l : ι → Filter α} {t : Set ι}
(hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint l) (ht : t.Finite) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ t.PairwiseDisjoint s := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rcases (hd.subtype _ _).exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint with ⟨s, hsl, hsd⟩
lift s to (i : t) → {s // s ∈ l i} using hsl
rcases @Subtype.exists_pi_extension ι (fun i => { s // s ∈ l i }) _ _ s with ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun i => s i, fun i => (s i).2, hsd.set_of_subtype _ _⟩
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.exists_mem_filter Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
#align filter.unique Filter.unique
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
#align filter.eq_top_of_ne_bot Filter.eq_top_of_neBot
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
#align filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot Filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, NeBot.ne <| forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1
fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
#align filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty Filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
#align filter.eq_Inf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans exists_range_iff.symm
#align filter.eq_infi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
#align filter.eq_binfi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_memₓ
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
-- Porting note: it was just `congr_arg filter.sets this.symm`
(congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm).trans <| by simp only
#align filter.infi_sets_eq Filter.iInf_sets_eq
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
#align filter.mem_infi_of_directed Filter.mem_iInf_of_directed
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
#align filter.mem_binfi_of_directed Filter.mem_biInf_of_directed
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
#align filter.binfi_sets_eq Filter.biInf_sets_eq
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset ι, (⨅ i ∈ t, f i).sets := by
rw [iInf_eq_iInf_finset, iInf_sets_eq]
exact directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ => biInf_mono
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite' (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset (PLift ι), (⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i)).sets := by
rw [← iInf_sets_eq_finite, ← Equiv.plift.surjective.iInf_comp, Equiv.plift_apply]
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite' Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite'
theorem mem_iInf_finite {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset ι, s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f i :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite Filter.mem_iInf_finite
theorem mem_iInf_finite' {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset (PLift ι), s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i) :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite' f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite' Filter.mem_iInf_finite'
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
#align filter.sup_join Filter.sup_join
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
#align filter.supr_join Filter.iSup_join
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
-- The dual version does not hold! `Filter α` is not a `CompleteDistribLattice`. -/
instance : Coframe (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf := fun f s t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [iInf_subtype']
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_sets_eq_finite, mem_iUnion] at h₂
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := h₂
rw [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hu
suffices ⨅ i : s, f ⊔ ↑i ≤ f ⊔ u.inf fun i => ↑i from this ⟨h₁, hu⟩
refine Finset.induction_on u (le_sup_of_le_right le_top) ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ u _ ih
rw [Finset.inf_insert, sup_inf_left]
exact le_inf (iInf_le _ _) ih }
theorem mem_iInf_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Filter β} {t : Set β} :
(t ∈ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) ↔ ∃ p : α → Set β, (∀ a ∈ s, p a ∈ f a) ∧ t = ⋂ a ∈ s, p a := by
simp only [← Finset.set_biInter_coe, biInter_eq_iInter, iInf_subtype']
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases (mem_iInf_of_finite _).1 h with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
refine ⟨fun a => if h : a ∈ s then p ⟨a, h⟩ else univ,
fun a ha => by simpa [ha] using hp ⟨a, ha⟩, ?_⟩
refine iInter_congr_of_surjective id surjective_id ?_
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
simp [ha]
· rintro ⟨p, hpf, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun a => mem_iInf_of_mem a (hpf a a.2)
#align filter.mem_infi_finset Filter.mem_iInf_finset
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed'
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed'
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed'
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iInf_sets_induct {f : ι → Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ iInf f) {p : Set α → Prop}
(uni : p univ) (ins : ∀ {i s₁ s₂}, s₁ ∈ f i → p s₂ → p (s₁ ∩ s₂)) : p s := by
rw [mem_iInf_finite'] at hs
simp only [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨is, his⟩
induction is using Finset.induction_on generalizing s with
| empty => rwa [mem_top.1 his]
| insert _ ih =>
rw [Finset.inf_insert, mem_inf_iff] at his
rcases his with ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, rfl⟩
exact ins hs₁ (ih hs₂)
#align filter.infi_sets_induct Filter.iInf_sets_induct
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
#align filter.inf_principal Filter.inf_principal
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
#align filter.sup_principal Filter.sup_principal
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
#align filter.supr_principal Filter.iSup_principal
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
#align filter.principal_eq_bot_iff Filter.principal_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align filter.principal_ne_bot_iff Filter.principal_neBot_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
#align set.nonempty.principal_ne_bot Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
#align filter.is_compl_principal Filter.isCompl_principal
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal' Filter.mem_inf_principal'
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal Filter.mem_inf_principal
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
#align filter.supr_inf_principal Filter.iSup_inf_principal
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
#align filter.mem_of_eq_bot Filter.mem_of_eq_bot
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
#align filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl Filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_le_iff Filter.principal_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal_finset {ι : Type w} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs
· simp
· rw [Finset.iInf_insert, Finset.set_biInter_insert, hs, inf_principal]
#align filter.infi_principal_finset Filter.iInf_principal_finset
theorem iInf_principal {ι : Sort w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype (PLift ι)
rw [← iInf_plift_down, ← iInter_plift_down]
simpa using iInf_principal_finset Finset.univ (f <| PLift.down ·)
/-- A special case of `iInf_principal` that is safe to mark `simp`. -/
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal' {ι : Type w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) :=
iInf_principal _
#align filter.infi_principal Filter.iInf_principal
theorem iInf_principal_finite {ι : Type w} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
lift s to Finset ι using hs
exact mod_cast iInf_principal_finset s f
#align filter.infi_principal_finite Filter.iInf_principal_finite
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
#align filter.join_mono Filter.join_mono
/-! ### Eventually -/
/-- `f.Eventually p` or `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | p x} ∈ f`. E.g., `∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that `p` holds true for sufficiently large `x`. -/
protected def Eventually (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
{ x | p x } ∈ f
#align filter.eventually Filter.Eventually
@[inherit_doc Filter.Eventually]
notation3 "∀ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p f) => r
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_iff Filter.eventually_iff
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_mem_set Filter.eventually_mem_set
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
#align filter.ext' Filter.ext'
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
#align filter.eventually.filter_mono Filter.Eventually.filter_mono
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
#align filter.eventually_of_mem Filter.eventually_of_mem
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
#align filter.eventually.and Filter.Eventually.and
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
#align filter.eventually_true Filter.eventually_true
theorem eventually_of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
#align filter.eventually_of_forall Filter.eventually_of_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
#align filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot Filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
#align filter.eventually_const Filter.eventually_const
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
#align filter.eventually.exists_mem Filter.Eventually.exists_mem
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
#align filter.eventually.mp Filter.Eventually.mp
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (eventually_of_forall hq)
#align filter.eventually.mono Filter.Eventually.mono
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
#align filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall Filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
#align filter.eventually_and Filter.eventually_and
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
#align filter.eventually.congr Filter.Eventually.congr
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
#align filter.eventually_congr Filter.eventually_congr
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p i x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using iInter_mem
#align filter.eventually_all Filter.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all_finite {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using biInter_mem hI
#align filter.eventually_all_finite Filter.eventually_all_finite
alias _root_.Set.Finite.eventually_all := eventually_all_finite
#align set.finite.eventually_all Set.Finite.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Set.Finite.eventually_all
@[simp] theorem eventually_all_finset {ι} (I : Finset ι) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x :=
I.finite_toSet.eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_all_finset Filter.eventually_all_finset
alias _root_.Finset.eventually_all := eventually_all_finset
#align finset.eventually_all Finset.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Finset.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_left Filter.eventually_or_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_right Filter.eventually_or_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
#align filter.eventually_bot Filter.eventually_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_top Filter.eventually_top
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_sup Filter.eventually_sup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_Sup Filter.eventually_sSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
#align filter.eventually_supr Filter.eventually_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_principal Filter.eventually_principal
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
#align filter.eventually_inf Filter.eventually_inf
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_inf_principal Filter.eventually_inf_principal
/-! ### Frequently -/
/-- `f.Frequently p` or `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`. E.g., `∃ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that there exist arbitrarily large `x` for which `p` holds true. -/
protected def Frequently (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
¬∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x
#align filter.frequently Filter.Frequently
@[inherit_doc Filter.Frequently]
notation3 "∃ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Frequently p f) => r
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
#align filter.eventually.frequently Filter.Eventually.frequently
theorem frequently_of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (eventually_of_forall h)
#align filter.frequently_of_forall Filter.frequently_of_forall
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
#align filter.frequently.mp Filter.Frequently.mp
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
#align filter.frequently.filter_mono Filter.Frequently.filter_mono
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (eventually_of_forall hpq)
#align filter.frequently.mono Filter.Frequently.mono
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
#align filter.frequently.and_eventually Filter.Frequently.and_eventually
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
#align filter.eventually.and_frequently Filter.Eventually.and_frequently
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := eventually_of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
#align filter.frequently.exists Filter.Frequently.exists
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
#align filter.eventually.exists Filter.Eventually.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp q hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
#align filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and Filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
#align filter.frequently_iff Filter.frequently_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.not_eventually Filter.not_eventually
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
#align filter.not_frequently Filter.not_frequently
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
#align filter.frequently_true_iff_ne_bot Filter.frequently_true_iff_neBot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
#align filter.frequently_false Filter.frequently_false
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align filter.frequently_const Filter.frequently_const
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib Filter.frequently_or_distrib
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_left Filter.frequently_or_distrib_left
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_right Filter.frequently_or_distrib_right
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib Filter.frequently_imp_distrib
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_left Filter.frequently_and_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_right Filter.frequently_and_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_bot Filter.frequently_bot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.frequently_top Filter.frequently_top
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
#align filter.frequently_principal Filter.frequently_principal
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
#align filter.frequently_sup Filter.frequently_sup
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
#align filter.frequently_Sup Filter.frequently_sSup
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
#align filter.frequently_supr Filter.frequently_iSup
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
#align filter.eventually.choice Filter.Eventually.choice
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
/-- Two functions `f` and `g` are *eventually equal* along a filter `l` if the set of `x` such that
`f x = g x` belongs to `l`. -/
def EventuallyEq (l : Filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x
#align filter.eventually_eq Filter.EventuallyEq
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 f " =ᶠ[" l:50 "] " g:50 => EventuallyEq l f g
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x :=
h
#align filter.eventually_eq.eventually Filter.EventuallyEq.eventually
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.rw Filter.EventuallyEq.rw
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| eventually_of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
#align filter.eventually_eq_set Filter.eventuallyEq_set
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
#align filter.eventually_eq.mem_iff Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_iff
#align filter.eventually.set_eq Filter.Eventually.set_eq
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
#align filter.eventually_eq_univ Filter.eventuallyEq_univ
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
#align filter.eventually_eq.exists_mem Filter.EventuallyEq.exists_mem
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
#align filter.eventually_eq_of_mem Filter.eventuallyEq_of_mem
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
#align filter.eventually_eq_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
#align filter.eventually_eq.filter_mono Filter.EventuallyEq.filter_mono
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.refl Filter.EventuallyEq.refl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
#align filter.eventually_eq.rfl Filter.EventuallyEq.rfl
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.symm Filter.EventuallyEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans Filter.EventuallyEq.trans
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prod_mk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
#align filter.eventually_eq.prod_mk Filter.EventuallyEq.prod_mk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
#align filter.eventually_eq.fun_comp Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prod_mk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
#align filter.eventually_eq.comp₂ Filter.EventuallyEq.comp₂
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.mul Filter.EventuallyEq.mul
#align filter.eventually_eq.add Filter.EventuallyEq.add
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ):
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
#align filter.eventually_eq.const_smul Filter.EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
#align filter.eventually_eq.inv Filter.EventuallyEq.inv
#align filter.eventually_eq.neg Filter.EventuallyEq.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.div Filter.EventuallyEq.div
#align filter.eventually_eq.sub Filter.EventuallyEq.sub
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
#align filter.eventually_eq.const_vadd Filter.EventuallyEq.const_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.smul Filter.EventuallyEq.smul
#align filter.eventually_eq.vadd Filter.EventuallyEq.vadd
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Sup β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.sup Filter.EventuallyEq.sup
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Inf β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.inf Filter.EventuallyEq.inf
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
#align filter.eventually_eq.preimage Filter.EventuallyEq.preimage
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.inter Filter.EventuallyEq.inter
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.union Filter.EventuallyEq.union
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
#align filter.eventually_eq.compl Filter.EventuallyEq.compl
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
#align filter.eventually_eq.diff Filter.EventuallyEq.diff
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
#align filter.eventually_eq_empty Filter.eventuallyEq_empty
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
#align filter.inter_eventually_eq_left Filter.inter_eventuallyEq_left
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
#align filter.inter_eventually_eq_right Filter.inter_eventuallyEq_right
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq_principal Filter.eventuallyEq_principal
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_eq_inf_principal_iff Filter.eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.sub_eq Filter.EventuallyEq.sub_eq
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
#align filter.eventually_eq_iff_sub Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_sub
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
/-- A function `f` is eventually less than or equal to a function `g` at a filter `l`. -/
def EventuallyLE (l : Filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x
#align filter.eventually_le Filter.EventuallyLE
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 f " ≤ᶠ[" l:50 "] " g:50 => EventuallyLE l f g
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
#align filter.eventually_le.congr Filter.EventuallyLE.congr
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
#align filter.eventually_le_congr Filter.eventuallyLE_congr
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
#align filter.eventually_eq.le Filter.EventuallyEq.le
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
#align filter.eventually_le.refl Filter.EventuallyLE.refl
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
#align filter.eventually_le.rfl Filter.EventuallyLE.rfl
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
#align filter.eventually_le.trans Filter.EventuallyLE.trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_le Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_le
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
#align filter.eventually_le.trans_eq Filter.EventuallyLE.trans_eq
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
#align filter.eventually_le.antisymm Filter.EventuallyLE.antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
#align filter.eventually_le_antisymm_iff Filter.eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
#align filter.eventually_le.le_iff_eq Filter.EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
#align filter.eventually.ne_of_lt Filter.Eventually.ne_of_lt
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
#align filter.eventually.ne_top_of_lt Filter.Eventually.ne_top_of_lt
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
#align filter.eventually.lt_top_of_ne Filter.Eventually.lt_top_of_ne
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
#align filter.eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top Filter.Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
#align filter.eventually_le.inter Filter.EventuallyLE.inter
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
#align filter.eventually_le.union Filter.EventuallyLE.union
protected lemma EventuallyLE.iUnion [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋃ i, s i) ≤ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(eventually_all.2 h).mono fun _x hx hx' ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 hx'; mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hx i hi⟩
protected lemma EventuallyEq.iUnion [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋃ i, s i) =ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.iUnion fun i ↦ (h i).le).antisymm <| .iUnion fun i ↦ (h i).symm.le
protected lemma EventuallyLE.iInter [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋂ i, s i) ≤ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(eventually_all.2 h).mono fun _x hx hx' ↦ mem_iInter.2 fun i ↦ hx i (mem_iInter.1 hx' i)
protected lemma EventuallyEq.iInter [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋂ i, s i) =ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.iInter fun i ↦ (h i).le).antisymm <| .iInter fun i ↦ (h i).symm.le
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact .iUnion fun i ↦ hle i.1 i.2
alias EventuallyLE.biUnion := Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
(EventuallyLE.biUnion hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).le).antisymm <|
.biUnion hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).symm.le
alias EventuallyEq.biUnion := Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biInter_eq_iInter, biInter_eq_iInter]
exact .iInter fun i ↦ hle i.1 i.2
alias EventuallyLE.biInter := Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iInter
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
(EventuallyLE.biInter hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).le).antisymm <|
.biInter hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).symm.le
alias EventuallyEq.biInter := Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iInter
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyLE_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biUnion s.finite_toSet hle
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyEq_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biUnion s.finite_toSet heq
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyLE_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biInter s.finite_toSet hle
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyEq_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biInter s.finite_toSet heq
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
#align filter.eventually_le.compl Filter.EventuallyLE.compl
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
#align filter.eventually_le.diff Filter.EventuallyLE.diff
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
#align filter.set_eventually_le_iff_mem_inf_principal Filter.set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and_iff, le_principal_iff]
#align filter.set_eventually_le_iff_inf_principal_le Filter.set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
#align filter.set_eventually_eq_iff_inf_principal Filter.set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul [MulZeroClass β] [PartialOrder β] [PosMulMono β] [MulPosMono β]
{l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) (hg₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g₁)
(hf₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg, hg₀, hf₀] with x using _root_.mul_le_mul
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_le_mul Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul
@[to_additive EventuallyLE.add_le_add]
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul' [Mul β] [Preorder β] [CovariantClass β β (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)]
[CovariantClass β β (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β}
(hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.mul_le_mul' hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_le_mul' Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul'
#align filter.eventually_le.add_le_add Filter.EventuallyLE.add_le_add
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_nonneg [OrderedSemiring β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f)
(hg : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g) : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f * g := by filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x using _root_.mul_nonneg
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_nonneg Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_nonneg
theorem eventually_sub_nonneg [OrderedRing β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
0 ≤ᶠ[l] g - f ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_congr <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => sub_nonneg
#align filter.eventually_sub_nonneg Filter.eventually_sub_nonneg
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.sup Filter.EventuallyLE.sup
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.sup_le Filter.EventuallyLE.sup_le
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
#align filter.eventually_le.le_sup_of_le_left Filter.EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
#align filter.eventually_le.le_sup_of_le_right Filter.EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
#align filter.join_le Filter.join_le
/-! ### Push-forwards, pull-backs, and the monad structure -/
section Map
/-- The forward map of a filter -/
def map (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := preimage m ⁻¹' f.sets
univ_sets := univ_mem
sets_of_superset hs st := mem_of_superset hs <| preimage_mono st
inter_sets hs ht := inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.map Filter.map
@[simp]
theorem map_principal {s : Set α} {f : α → β} : map f (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (Set.image f s) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => image_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.map_principal Filter.map_principal
variable {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
@[simp]
theorem eventually_map {P : β → Prop} : (∀ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∀ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_map Filter.eventually_map
@[simp]
theorem frequently_map {P : β → Prop} : (∃ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∃ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.frequently_map Filter.frequently_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map : t ∈ map m f ↔ m ⁻¹' t ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map Filter.mem_map
theorem mem_map' : t ∈ map m f ↔ { x | m x ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map' Filter.mem_map'
theorem image_mem_map (hs : s ∈ f) : m '' s ∈ map m f :=
f.sets_of_superset hs <| subset_preimage_image m s
#align filter.image_mem_map Filter.image_mem_map
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Filter.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem image_mem_map_iff (hf : Injective m) : m '' s ∈ map m f ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← preimage_image_eq s hf], image_mem_map⟩
#align filter.image_mem_map_iff Filter.image_mem_map_iff
theorem range_mem_map : range m ∈ map m f := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact image_mem_map univ_mem
#align filter.range_mem_map Filter.range_mem_map
theorem mem_map_iff_exists_image : t ∈ map m f ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, m '' s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun ht => ⟨m ⁻¹' t, ht, image_preimage_subset _ _⟩, fun ⟨_, hs, ht⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (image_mem_map hs) ht⟩
#align filter.mem_map_iff_exists_image Filter.mem_map_iff_exists_image
@[simp]
theorem map_id : Filter.map id f = f :=
filter_eq <| rfl
#align filter.map_id Filter.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : Filter.map (fun x => x) f = f :=
map_id
#align filter.map_id' Filter.map_id'
@[simp]
theorem map_compose : Filter.map m' ∘ Filter.map m = Filter.map (m' ∘ m) :=
funext fun _ => filter_eq <| rfl
#align filter.map_compose Filter.map_compose
@[simp]
theorem map_map : Filter.map m' (Filter.map m f) = Filter.map (m' ∘ m) f :=
congr_fun Filter.map_compose f
#align filter.map_map Filter.map_map
/-- If functions `m₁` and `m₂` are eventually equal at a filter `f`, then
they map this filter to the same filter. -/
theorem map_congr {m₁ m₂ : α → β} {f : Filter α} (h : m₁ =ᶠ[f] m₂) : map m₁ f = map m₂ f :=
Filter.ext' fun _ => eventually_congr (h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl)
#align filter.map_congr Filter.map_congr
end Map
section Comap
/-- The inverse map of a filter. A set `s` belongs to `Filter.comap m f` if either of the following
equivalent conditions hold.
1. There exists a set `t ∈ f` such that `m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s`. This is used as a definition.
2. The set `kernImage m s = {y | ∀ x, m x = y → x ∈ s}` belongs to `f`, see `Filter.mem_comap'`.
3. The set `(m '' sᶜ)ᶜ` belongs to `f`, see `Filter.mem_comap_iff_compl` and
`Filter.compl_mem_comap`. -/
def comap (m : α → β) (f : Filter β) : Filter α where
sets := { s | ∃ t ∈ f, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s }
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, by simp only [subset_univ, preimage_univ]⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab => ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩ =>
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁, inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂⟩
#align filter.comap Filter.comap
variable {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α}
theorem mem_comap' : s ∈ comap f l ↔ { y | ∀ ⦃x⦄, f x = y → x ∈ s } ∈ l :=
⟨fun ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht fun y hy x hx => hts <| mem_preimage.2 <| by rwa [hx],
fun h => ⟨_, h, fun x hx => hx rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.mem_comap' Filter.mem_comap'
-- TODO: it would be nice to use `kernImage` much more to take advantage of common name and API,
-- and then this would become `mem_comap'`
theorem mem_comap'' : s ∈ comap f l ↔ kernImage f s ∈ l :=
mem_comap'
/-- RHS form is used, e.g., in the definition of `UniformSpace`. -/
lemma mem_comap_prod_mk {x : α} {s : Set β} {F : Filter (α × β)} :
s ∈ comap (Prod.mk x) F ↔ {p : α × β | p.fst = x → p.snd ∈ s} ∈ F := by
simp_rw [mem_comap', Prod.ext_iff, and_imp, @forall_swap β (_ = _), forall_eq, eq_comm]
#align filter.mem_comap_prod_mk Filter.mem_comap_prod_mk
@[simp]
theorem eventually_comap : (∀ᶠ a in comap f l, p a) ↔ ∀ᶠ b in l, ∀ a, f a = b → p a :=
mem_comap'
#align filter.eventually_comap Filter.eventually_comap
@[simp]
theorem frequently_comap : (∃ᶠ a in comap f l, p a) ↔ ∃ᶠ b in l, ∃ a, f a = b ∧ p a := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_comap, not_exists, _root_.not_and]
#align filter.frequently_comap Filter.frequently_comap
theorem mem_comap_iff_compl : s ∈ comap f l ↔ (f '' sᶜ)ᶜ ∈ l := by
simp only [mem_comap'', kernImage_eq_compl]
#align filter.mem_comap_iff_compl Filter.mem_comap_iff_compl
theorem compl_mem_comap : sᶜ ∈ comap f l ↔ (f '' s)ᶜ ∈ l := by rw [mem_comap_iff_compl, compl_compl]
#align filter.compl_mem_comap Filter.compl_mem_comap
end Comap
section KernMap
/-- The analog of `kernImage` for filters. A set `s` belongs to `Filter.kernMap m f` if either of
the following equivalent conditions hold.
1. There exists a set `t ∈ f` such that `s = kernImage m t`. This is used as a definition.
2. There exists a set `t` such that `tᶜ ∈ f` and `sᶜ = m '' t`, see `Filter.mem_kernMap_iff_compl`
and `Filter.compl_mem_kernMap`.
This definition because it gives a right adjoint to `Filter.comap`, and because it has a nice
interpretation when working with `co-` filters (`Filter.cocompact`, `Filter.cofinite`, ...).
For example, `kernMap m (cocompact α)` is the filter generated by the complements of the sets
`m '' K` where `K` is a compact subset of `α`. -/
def kernMap (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := (kernImage m) '' f.sets
univ_sets := ⟨univ, f.univ_sets, by simp [kernImage_eq_compl]⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro _ t ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩ hst
refine ⟨s ∪ m ⁻¹' t, mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [kernImage_union_preimage, union_eq_right.mpr hst]
inter_sets := by
rintro _ _ ⟨s₁, h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁ ∩ s₂, f.inter_sets h₁ h₂, Set.preimage_kernImage.u_inf⟩
variable {m : α → β} {f : Filter α}
theorem mem_kernMap {s : Set β} : s ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, kernImage m t = s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_kernMap_iff_compl {s : Set β} : s ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t, tᶜ ∈ f ∧ m '' t = sᶜ := by
rw [mem_kernMap, compl_surjective.exists]
refine exists_congr (fun x ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦ ?_)
rw [kernImage_compl, compl_eq_comm, eq_comm]
theorem compl_mem_kernMap {s : Set β} : sᶜ ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t, tᶜ ∈ f ∧ m '' t = s := by
simp_rw [mem_kernMap_iff_compl, compl_compl]
end KernMap
/-- The monadic bind operation on filter is defined the usual way in terms of `map` and `join`.
Unfortunately, this `bind` does not result in the expected applicative. See `Filter.seq` for the
applicative instance. -/
def bind (f : Filter α) (m : α → Filter β) : Filter β :=
join (map m f)
#align filter.bind Filter.bind
/-- The applicative sequentiation operation. This is not induced by the bind operation. -/
def seq (f : Filter (α → β)) (g : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := { s | ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ m ∈ u, ∀ x ∈ t, (m : α → β) x ∈ s }
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, univ, univ_mem, fun _ _ _ _ => trivial⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, h⟩ hst =>
⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, fun _ hx _ hy => hst <| h _ hx _ hy⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨t₀, ht₀, t₁, ht₁, ht⟩ ⟨u₀, hu₀, u₁, hu₁, hu⟩ =>
⟨t₀ ∩ u₀, inter_mem ht₀ hu₀, t₁ ∩ u₁, inter_mem ht₁ hu₁, fun _ ⟨hx₀, hx₁⟩ _ ⟨hy₀, hy₁⟩ =>
⟨ht _ hx₀ _ hy₀, hu _ hx₁ _ hy₁⟩⟩
#align filter.seq Filter.seq
/-- `pure x` is the set of sets that contain `x`. It is equal to `𝓟 {x}` but
with this definition we have `s ∈ pure a` defeq `a ∈ s`. -/
instance : Pure Filter :=
⟨fun x =>
{ sets := { s | x ∈ s }
inter_sets := And.intro
sets_of_superset := fun hs hst => hst hs
univ_sets := trivial }⟩
instance : Bind Filter :=
⟨@Filter.bind⟩
instance : Functor Filter where map := @Filter.map
instance : LawfulFunctor (Filter : Type u → Type u) where
id_map _ := map_id
comp_map _ _ _ := map_map.symm
map_const := rfl
theorem pure_sets (a : α) : (pure a : Filter α).sets = { s | a ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align filter.pure_sets Filter.pure_sets
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ (pure a : Filter α) ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_pure Filter.mem_pure
@[simp]
theorem eventually_pure {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in pure a, p x) ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_pure Filter.eventually_pure
@[simp]
theorem principal_singleton (a : α) : 𝓟 {a} = pure a :=
Filter.ext fun s => by simp only [mem_pure, mem_principal, singleton_subset_iff]
#align filter.principal_singleton Filter.principal_singleton
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
#align filter.map_pure Filter.map_pure
theorem pure_le_principal (a : α) : pure a ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp
@[simp] theorem join_pure (f : Filter α) : join (pure f) = f := rfl
#align filter.join_pure Filter.join_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_bind (a : α) (m : α → Filter β) : bind (pure a) m = m a := by
simp only [Bind.bind, bind, map_pure, join_pure]
#align filter.pure_bind Filter.pure_bind
theorem map_bind {α β} (m : β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : α → Filter β) :
map m (bind f g) = bind f (map m ∘ g) :=
rfl
theorem bind_map {α β} (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) (g : β → Filter γ) :
(bind (map m f) g) = bind f (g ∘ m) :=
rfl
/-!
### `Filter` as a `Monad`
In this section we define `Filter.monad`, a `Monad` structure on `Filter`s. This definition is not
an instance because its `Seq` projection is not equal to the `Filter.seq` function we use in the
`Applicative` instance on `Filter`.
-/
section
/-- The monad structure on filters. -/
protected def monad : Monad Filter where map := @Filter.map
#align filter.monad Filter.monad
attribute [local instance] Filter.monad
protected theorem lawfulMonad : LawfulMonad Filter where
map_const := rfl
id_map _ := rfl
seqLeft_eq _ _ := rfl
seqRight_eq _ _ := rfl
pure_seq _ _ := rfl
bind_pure_comp _ _ := rfl
bind_map _ _ := rfl
pure_bind _ _ := rfl
bind_assoc _ _ _ := rfl
#align filter.is_lawful_monad Filter.lawfulMonad
end
instance : Alternative Filter where
seq := fun x y => x.seq (y ())
failure := ⊥
orElse x y := x ⊔ y ()
@[simp]
theorem map_def {α β} (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : m <$> f = map m f :=
rfl
#align filter.map_def Filter.map_def
@[simp]
theorem bind_def {α β} (f : Filter α) (m : α → Filter β) : f >>= m = bind f m :=
rfl
#align filter.bind_def Filter.bind_def
/-! #### `map` and `comap` equations -/
section Map
variable {f f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g g₁ g₂ : Filter β} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
@[simp] theorem mem_comap : s ∈ comap m g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_comap Filter.mem_comap
theorem preimage_mem_comap (ht : t ∈ g) : m ⁻¹' t ∈ comap m g :=
⟨t, ht, Subset.rfl⟩
#align filter.preimage_mem_comap Filter.preimage_mem_comap
theorem Eventually.comap {p : β → Prop} (hf : ∀ᶠ b in g, p b) (f : α → β) :
∀ᶠ a in comap f g, p (f a) :=
preimage_mem_comap hf
#align filter.eventually.comap Filter.Eventually.comap
theorem comap_id : comap id f = f :=
le_antisymm (fun _ => preimage_mem_comap) fun _ ⟨_, ht, hst⟩ => mem_of_superset ht hst
#align filter.comap_id Filter.comap_id
theorem comap_id' : comap (fun x => x) f = f := comap_id
#align filter.comap_id' Filter.comap_id'
theorem comap_const_of_not_mem {x : β} (ht : t ∈ g) (hx : x ∉ t) : comap (fun _ : α => x) g = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| mem_comap'.2 <| mem_of_superset ht fun _ hx' _ h => hx <| h.symm ▸ hx'
#align filter.comap_const_of_not_mem Filter.comap_const_of_not_mem
theorem comap_const_of_mem {x : β} (h : ∀ t ∈ g, x ∈ t) : comap (fun _ : α => x) g = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun _ hs => univ_mem' fun _ => h _ (mem_comap'.1 hs) rfl
#align filter.comap_const_of_mem Filter.comap_const_of_mem
theorem map_const [NeBot f] {c : β} : (f.map fun _ => c) = pure c := by
ext s
by_cases h : c ∈ s <;> simp [h]
#align filter.map_const Filter.map_const
theorem comap_comap {m : γ → β} {n : β → α} : comap m (comap n f) = comap (n ∘ m) f :=
Filter.coext fun s => by simp only [compl_mem_comap, image_image, (· ∘ ·)]
#align filter.comap_comap Filter.comap_comap
section comm
/-!
The variables in the following lemmas are used as in this diagram:
```
φ
α → β
θ ↓ ↓ ψ
γ → δ
ρ
```
-/
variable {φ : α → β} {θ : α → γ} {ψ : β → δ} {ρ : γ → δ} (H : ψ ∘ φ = ρ ∘ θ)
theorem map_comm (F : Filter α) : map ψ (map φ F) = map ρ (map θ F) := by
rw [Filter.map_map, H, ← Filter.map_map]
#align filter.map_comm Filter.map_comm
theorem comap_comm (G : Filter δ) : comap φ (comap ψ G) = comap θ (comap ρ G) := by
rw [Filter.comap_comap, H, ← Filter.comap_comap]
#align filter.comap_comm Filter.comap_comm
end comm
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.filter_map {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) :=
map_comm h.comp_eq
#align function.semiconj.filter_map Function.Semiconj.filter_map
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.filter_map {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (map f) (map g) :=
h.semiconj.filter_map
#align function.commute.filter_map Function.Commute.filter_map
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.filter_comap {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (comap f) (comap gb) (comap ga) :=
comap_comm h.comp_eq.symm
#align function.semiconj.filter_comap Function.Semiconj.filter_comap
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.filter_comap {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (comap f) (comap g) :=
h.semiconj.filter_comap
#align function.commute.filter_comap Function.Commute.filter_comap
section
open Filter
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.filter_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInverse g f) :
LeftInverse (map g) (map f) := fun F ↦ by
rw [map_map, hfg.comp_eq_id, map_id]
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.filter_comap {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInverse g f) :
RightInverse (comap g) (comap f) := fun F ↦ by
rw [comap_comap, hfg.comp_eq_id, comap_id]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.filter_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInverse g f) : RightInverse (map g) (map f) :=
hfg.filter_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.filter_comap {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInverse g f) : LeftInverse (comap g) (comap f) :=
hfg.filter_comap
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.filter_map_Iic {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInvOn g f s) :
LeftInvOn (map g) (map f) (Iic <| 𝓟 s) := fun F (hF : F ≤ 𝓟 s) ↦ by
have : (g ∘ f) =ᶠ[𝓟 s] id := by simpa only [eventuallyEq_principal] using hfg
rw [map_map, map_congr (this.filter_mono hF), map_id]
nonrec theorem _root_.Set.RightInvOn.filter_map_Iic {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInvOn g f t) : RightInvOn (map g) (map f) (Iic <| 𝓟 t) :=
hfg.filter_map_Iic
end
@[simp]
theorem comap_principal {t : Set β} : comap m (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' t) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨_u, hu, b⟩ => (preimage_mono hu).trans b,
fun h => ⟨t, Subset.rfl, h⟩⟩
#align filter.comap_principal Filter.comap_principal
theorem principal_subtype {α : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set s) :
𝓟 t = comap (↑) (𝓟 (((↑) : s → α) '' t)) := by
rw [comap_principal, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.coe_injective]
#align principal_subtype Filter.principal_subtype
@[simp]
theorem comap_pure {b : β} : comap m (pure b) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [← principal_singleton, comap_principal]
#align filter.comap_pure Filter.comap_pure
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map m f ≤ g ↔ f ≤ comap m g :=
⟨fun h _ ⟨_, ht, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset (h ht) hts, fun h _ ht => h ⟨_, ht, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.map_le_iff_le_comap Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (m : α → β) : GaloisConnection (map m) (comap m) :=
fun _ _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
#align filter.gc_map_comap Filter.gc_map_comap
theorem comap_le_iff_le_kernMap : comap m g ≤ f ↔ g ≤ kernMap m f := by
simp [Filter.le_def, mem_comap'', mem_kernMap, -mem_comap]
theorem gc_comap_kernMap (m : α → β) : GaloisConnection (comap m) (kernMap m) :=
fun _ _ ↦ comap_le_iff_le_kernMap
theorem kernMap_principal {s : Set α} : kernMap m (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (kernImage m s) := by
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (fun g ↦ ?_)
rw [← comap_le_iff_le_kernMap, le_principal_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_comap'']
@[mono]
theorem map_mono : Monotone (map m) :=
(gc_map_comap m).monotone_l
#align filter.map_mono Filter.map_mono
@[mono]
theorem comap_mono : Monotone (comap m) :=
(gc_map_comap m).monotone_u
#align filter.comap_mono Filter.comap_mono
/-- Temporary lemma that we can tag with `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr, deprecated] theorem map_le_map (h : F ≤ G) : map m F ≤ map m G := map_mono h
/-- Temporary lemma that we can tag with `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr, deprecated] theorem comap_le_comap (h : F ≤ G) : comap m F ≤ comap m G := comap_mono h
@[simp] theorem map_bot : map m ⊥ = ⊥ := (gc_map_comap m).l_bot
#align filter.map_bot Filter.map_bot
@[simp] theorem map_sup : map m (f₁ ⊔ f₂) = map m f₁ ⊔ map m f₂ := (gc_map_comap m).l_sup
#align filter.map_sup Filter.map_sup
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {f : ι → Filter α} : map m (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, map m (f i) :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_iSup
#align filter.map_supr Filter.map_iSup
@[simp]
theorem map_top (f : α → β) : map f ⊤ = 𝓟 (range f) := by
rw [← principal_univ, map_principal, image_univ]
#align filter.map_top Filter.map_top
@[simp] theorem comap_top : comap m ⊤ = ⊤ := (gc_map_comap m).u_top
#align filter.comap_top Filter.comap_top
@[simp] theorem comap_inf : comap m (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊓ comap m g₂ := (gc_map_comap m).u_inf
#align filter.comap_inf Filter.comap_inf
@[simp]
theorem comap_iInf {f : ι → Filter β} : comap m (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, comap m (f i) :=
(gc_map_comap m).u_iInf
#align filter.comap_infi Filter.comap_iInf
theorem le_comap_top (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) : l ≤ comap f ⊤ := by
rw [comap_top]
exact le_top
#align filter.le_comap_top Filter.le_comap_top
theorem map_comap_le : map m (comap m g) ≤ g :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_u_le _
#align filter.map_comap_le Filter.map_comap_le
theorem le_comap_map : f ≤ comap m (map m f) :=
(gc_map_comap m).le_u_l _
#align filter.le_comap_map Filter.le_comap_map
@[simp]
theorem comap_bot : comap m ⊥ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp only [empty_subset, preimage_empty]⟩
#align filter.comap_bot Filter.comap_bot
theorem neBot_of_comap (h : (comap m g).NeBot) : g.NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff] at *
contrapose! h
rw [h]
exact comap_bot
#align filter.ne_bot_of_comap Filter.neBot_of_comap
theorem comap_inf_principal_range : comap m (g ⊓ 𝓟 (range m)) = comap m g := by
simp
#align filter.comap_inf_principal_range Filter.comap_inf_principal_range
theorem disjoint_comap (h : Disjoint g₁ g₂) : Disjoint (comap m g₁) (comap m g₂) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← comap_inf, h.eq_bot, comap_bot]
#align filter.disjoint_comap Filter.disjoint_comap
theorem comap_iSup {ι} {f : ι → Filter β} {m : α → β} : comap m (iSup f) = ⨆ i, comap m (f i) :=
(gc_comap_kernMap m).l_iSup
#align filter.comap_supr Filter.comap_iSup
theorem comap_sSup {s : Set (Filter β)} {m : α → β} : comap m (sSup s) = ⨆ f ∈ s, comap m f := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, comap_iSup, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.comap_Sup Filter.comap_sSup
theorem comap_sup : comap m (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊔ comap m g₂ := by
rw [sup_eq_iSup, comap_iSup, iSup_bool_eq, Bool.cond_true, Bool.cond_false]
#align filter.comap_sup Filter.comap_sup
theorem map_comap (f : Filter β) (m : α → β) : (f.comap m).map m = f ⊓ 𝓟 (range m) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_inf map_comap_le <| le_principal_iff.2 range_mem_map) ?_
rintro t' ⟨t, ht, sub⟩
refine mem_inf_principal.2 (mem_of_superset ht ?_)
rintro _ hxt ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact sub hxt
#align filter.map_comap Filter.map_comap
theorem map_comap_setCoe_val (f : Filter β) (s : Set β) :
(f.comap ((↑) : s → β)).map (↑) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
rw [map_comap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_comap_of_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) : (f.comap m).map m = f := by
rw [map_comap, inf_eq_left.2 (le_principal_iff.2 hf)]
#align filter.map_comap_of_mem Filter.map_comap_of_mem
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Filter α) (Filter β) (map c) fun f => ∀ᶠ x : α in f, p x where
prf f hf := ⟨comap c f, map_comap_of_mem <| hf.mono CanLift.prf⟩
#align filter.can_lift Filter.canLift
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f g : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) :
comap m f ≤ comap m g ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨fun h => map_comap_of_mem hf ▸ (map_mono h).trans map_comap_le, fun h => comap_mono h⟩
#align filter.comap_le_comap_iff Filter.comap_le_comap_iff
theorem map_comap_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (l : Filter β) :
map f (comap f l) = l :=
map_comap_of_mem <| by simp only [hf.range_eq, univ_mem]
#align filter.map_comap_of_surjective Filter.map_comap_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (comap f) :=
LeftInverse.injective <| map_comap_of_surjective hf
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.filter_map_top {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(congr_arg _ comap_top).symm.trans <| map_comap_of_surjective hf ⊤
#align function.surjective.filter_map_top Function.Surjective.filter_map_top
theorem subtype_coe_map_comap (s : Set α) (f : Filter α) :
map ((↑) : s → α) (comap ((↑) : s → α) f) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s := by rw [map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
#align filter.subtype_coe_map_comap Filter.subtype_coe_map_comap
theorem image_mem_of_mem_comap {f : Filter α} {c : β → α} (h : range c ∈ f) {W : Set β}
(W_in : W ∈ comap c f) : c '' W ∈ f := by
rw [← map_comap_of_mem h]
exact image_mem_map W_in
#align filter.image_mem_of_mem_comap Filter.image_mem_of_mem_comap
theorem image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap {f : Filter α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ f) {W : Set U}
(W_in : W ∈ comap ((↑) : U → α) f) : (↑) '' W ∈ f :=
image_mem_of_mem_comap (by simp [h]) W_in
#align filter.image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap Filter.image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap
theorem comap_map {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (h : Injective m) : comap m (map m f) = f :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
mem_of_superset (preimage_mem_comap <| image_mem_map hs) <| by
simp only [preimage_image_eq s h, Subset.rfl])
le_comap_map
#align filter.comap_map Filter.comap_map
theorem mem_comap_iff {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (inj : Injective m) (large : Set.range m ∈ f)
{S : Set α} : S ∈ comap m f ↔ m '' S ∈ f := by
rw [← image_mem_map_iff inj, map_comap_of_mem large]
#align filter.mem_comap_iff Filter.mem_comap_iff
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injOn {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : s ∈ l₁)
(h₂ : s ∈ l₂) (hinj : InjOn f s) : map f l₁ ≤ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂ :=
⟨fun h _t ht =>
mp_mem h₁ <|
mem_of_superset (h <| image_mem_map (inter_mem h₂ ht)) fun _y ⟨_x, ⟨hxs, hxt⟩, hxy⟩ hys =>
hinj hxs hys hxy ▸ hxt,
fun h => map_mono h⟩
#align filter.map_le_map_iff_of_inj_on Filter.map_le_map_iff_of_injOn
theorem map_le_map_iff {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) :
map m f ≤ map m g ↔ f ≤ g := by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map hm]
#align filter.map_le_map_iff Filter.map_le_map_iff
theorem map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} {s : Set α} (hsf : s ∈ f) (hsg : s ∈ g)
(hm : InjOn m s) : map m f = map m g ↔ f = g := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, map_le_map_iff_of_injOn hsf hsg hm,
map_le_map_iff_of_injOn hsg hsf hm]
#align filter.map_eq_map_iff_of_inj_on Filter.map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn
theorem map_inj {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) : map m f = map m g ↔ f = g :=
map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn univ_mem univ_mem hm.injOn
#align filter.map_inj Filter.map_inj
theorem map_injective {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) : Injective (map m) := fun _ _ =>
(map_inj hm).1
#align filter.map_injective Filter.map_injective
theorem comap_neBot_iff {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} : NeBot (comap m f) ↔ ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t := by
simp only [← forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot, mem_comap, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
exact ⟨fun h t t_in => h (m ⁻¹' t) t t_in Subset.rfl, fun h s t ht hst => (h t ht).imp hst⟩
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_neBot_iff
theorem comap_neBot {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t) : NeBot (comap m f) :=
comap_neBot_iff.mpr hm
#align filter.comap_ne_bot Filter.comap_neBot
theorem comap_neBot_iff_frequently {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} :
NeBot (comap m f) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in f, y ∈ range m := by
simp only [comap_neBot_iff, frequently_iff, mem_range, @and_comm (_ ∈ _), exists_exists_eq_and]
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently Filter.comap_neBot_iff_frequently
theorem comap_neBot_iff_compl_range {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} :
NeBot (comap m f) ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∉ f :=
comap_neBot_iff_frequently
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff_compl_range Filter.comap_neBot_iff_compl_range
theorem comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} : comap m f = ⊥ ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∈ f :=
not_iff_not.mp <| neBot_iff.symm.trans comap_neBot_iff_compl_range
#align filter.comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range Filter.comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range
theorem comap_surjective_eq_bot {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : Surjective m) :
comap m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ := by
rw [comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range, hm.range_eq, compl_univ, empty_mem_iff_bot]
#align filter.comap_surjective_eq_bot Filter.comap_surjective_eq_bot
theorem disjoint_comap_iff (h : Surjective m) :
Disjoint (comap m g₁) (comap m g₂) ↔ Disjoint g₁ g₂ := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← comap_inf, comap_surjective_eq_bot h]
#align filter.disjoint_comap_iff Filter.disjoint_comap_iff
theorem NeBot.comap_of_range_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (_ : NeBot f) (hm : range m ∈ f) :
NeBot (comap m f) :=
comap_neBot_iff_frequently.2 <| Eventually.frequently hm
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_range_mem Filter.NeBot.comap_of_range_mem
@[simp]
theorem comap_fst_neBot_iff {f : Filter α} :
(f.comap (Prod.fst : α × β → α)).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ Nonempty β := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; simp [*]
· simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, *]
#align filter.comap_fst_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_fst_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_fst_neBot [Nonempty β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] :
(f.comap (Prod.fst : α × β → α)).NeBot :=
comap_fst_neBot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
#align filter.comap_fst_ne_bot Filter.comap_fst_neBot
@[simp]
theorem comap_snd_neBot_iff {f : Filter β} :
(f.comap (Prod.snd : α × β → β)).NeBot ↔ Nonempty α ∧ f.NeBot := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; simp
· simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, hα]
#align filter.comap_snd_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_snd_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_snd_neBot [Nonempty α] {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] :
(f.comap (Prod.snd : α × β → β)).NeBot :=
comap_snd_neBot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
#align filter.comap_snd_ne_bot Filter.comap_snd_neBot
theorem comap_eval_neBot_iff' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {i : ι} {f : Filter (α i)} :
(comap (eval i) f).NeBot ↔ (∀ j, Nonempty (α j)) ∧ NeBot f := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty (∀ j, α j) with H H
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]
simp [← Classical.nonempty_pi]
· have : ∀ j, Nonempty (α j) := Classical.nonempty_pi.1 H
simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, *]
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot_iff' Filter.comap_eval_neBot_iff'
@[simp]
theorem comap_eval_neBot_iff {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, Nonempty (α j)] {i : ι}
{f : Filter (α i)} : (comap (eval i) f).NeBot ↔ NeBot f := by simp [comap_eval_neBot_iff', *]
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_eval_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_eval_neBot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, Nonempty (α j)] (i : ι)
(f : Filter (α i)) [NeBot f] : (comap (eval i) f).NeBot :=
comap_eval_neBot_iff.2 ‹_›
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot Filter.comap_eval_neBot
theorem comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α}
(hs : m '' s ∈ f) : NeBot (comap m f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := by
refine ⟨compl_compl s ▸ mt mem_of_eq_bot ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
rcases hf.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hs ht) with ⟨_, ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩, hxt⟩
exact absurd hxs (hts hxt)
#align filter.comap_inf_principal_ne_bot_of_image_mem Filter.comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem
theorem comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal {s : Set γ} {l : Filter γ} [h : NeBot l] (h' : l ≤ 𝓟 s) :
NeBot (comap ((↑) : s → γ) l) :=
h.comap_of_range_mem <| (@Subtype.range_coe γ s).symm ▸ h' (mem_principal_self s)
#align filter.comap_coe_ne_bot_of_le_principal Filter.comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal
theorem NeBot.comap_of_surj {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) (hm : Surjective m) :
NeBot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem <| univ_mem' hm
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_surj Filter.NeBot.comap_of_surj
theorem NeBot.comap_of_image_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α}
(hs : m '' s ∈ f) : NeBot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem <| mem_of_superset hs (image_subset_range _ _)
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_image_mem Filter.NeBot.comap_of_image_mem
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff : map m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot]
exact id, fun h => by simp only [h, map_bot]⟩
#align filter.map_eq_bot_iff Filter.map_eq_bot_iff
theorem map_neBot_iff (f : α → β) {F : Filter α} : NeBot (map f F) ↔ NeBot F := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.map_ne_bot_iff Filter.map_neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.map (hf : NeBot f) (m : α → β) : NeBot (map m f) :=
(map_neBot_iff m).2 hf
#align filter.ne_bot.map Filter.NeBot.map
theorem NeBot.of_map : NeBot (f.map m) → NeBot f :=
(map_neBot_iff m).1
#align filter.ne_bot.of_map Filter.NeBot.of_map
instance map_neBot [hf : NeBot f] : NeBot (f.map m) :=
hf.map m
#align filter.map_ne_bot Filter.map_neBot
theorem sInter_comap_sets (f : α → β) (F : Filter β) : ⋂₀ (comap f F).sets = ⋂ U ∈ F, f ⁻¹' U := by
ext x
suffices (∀ (A : Set α) (B : Set β), B ∈ F → f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A → x ∈ A) ↔
∀ B : Set β, B ∈ F → f x ∈ B by
simp only [mem_sInter, mem_iInter, Filter.mem_sets, mem_comap, this, and_imp, exists_prop,
mem_preimage, exists_imp]
constructor
· intro h U U_in
simpa only [Subset.rfl, forall_prop_of_true, mem_preimage] using h (f ⁻¹' U) U U_in
· intro h V U U_in f_U_V
exact f_U_V (h U U_in)
#align filter.sInter_comap_sets Filter.sInter_comap_sets
end Map
-- this is a generic rule for monotone functions:
theorem map_iInf_le {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (iInf f) ≤ ⨅ i, map m (f i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => map_mono <| iInf_le _ _
#align filter.map_infi_le Filter.map_iInf_le
theorem map_iInf_eq {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] :
map m (iInf f) = ⨅ i, map m (f i) :=
map_iInf_le.antisymm fun s (hs : m ⁻¹' s ∈ iInf f) =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := (mem_iInf_of_directed hf _).1 hs
have : ⨅ i, map m (f i) ≤ 𝓟 s :=
iInf_le_of_le i <| by simpa only [le_principal_iff, mem_map]
Filter.le_principal_iff.1 this
#align filter.map_infi_eq Filter.map_iInf_eq
theorem map_biInf_eq {ι : Type w} {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} {p : ι → Prop}
(h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) { x | p x }) (ne : ∃ i, p i) :
map m (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), map m (f i) := by
haveI := nonempty_subtype.2 ne
simp only [iInf_subtype']
exact map_iInf_eq h.directed_val
#align filter.map_binfi_eq Filter.map_biInf_eq
theorem map_inf_le {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (f ⊓ g) ≤ map m f ⊓ map m g :=
(@map_mono _ _ m).map_inf_le f g
#align filter.map_inf_le Filter.map_inf_le
theorem map_inf {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (h : Injective m) :
map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g := by
refine map_inf_le.antisymm ?_
rintro t ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, ht : m ⁻¹' t = s₁ ∩ s₂⟩
refine mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂) ?_
rw [← image_inter h, image_subset_iff, ht]
#align filter.map_inf Filter.map_inf
theorem map_inf' {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} {t : Set α} (htf : t ∈ f) (htg : t ∈ g)
(h : InjOn m t) : map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g := by
lift f to Filter t using htf; lift g to Filter t using htg
replace h : Injective (m ∘ ((↑) : t → α)) := h.injective
simp only [map_map, ← map_inf Subtype.coe_injective, map_inf h]
#align filter.map_inf' Filter.map_inf'
lemma disjoint_of_map {α β : Type*} {F G : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : Disjoint (map f F) (map f G)) : Disjoint F G :=
disjoint_iff.mpr <| map_eq_bot_iff.mp <| le_bot_iff.mp <| trans map_inf_le (disjoint_iff.mp h)
theorem disjoint_map {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} :
Disjoint (map m f₁) (map m f₂) ↔ Disjoint f₁ f₂ := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← map_inf hm, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.disjoint_map Filter.disjoint_map
theorem map_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : Filter β) : map e.symm f = comap e f :=
map_injective e.injective <| by
rw [map_map, e.self_comp_symm, map_id, map_comap_of_surjective e.surjective]
#align filter.map_equiv_symm Filter.map_equiv_symm
theorem map_eq_comap_of_inverse {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {n : β → α} (h₁ : m ∘ n = id)
(h₂ : n ∘ m = id) : map m f = comap n f :=
map_equiv_symm ⟨n, m, congr_fun h₁, congr_fun h₂⟩ f
#align filter.map_eq_comap_of_inverse Filter.map_eq_comap_of_inverse
theorem comap_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : Filter α) : comap e.symm f = map e f :=
(map_eq_comap_of_inverse e.self_comp_symm e.symm_comp_self).symm
#align filter.comap_equiv_symm Filter.comap_equiv_symm
theorem map_swap_eq_comap_swap {f : Filter (α × β)} : Prod.swap <$> f = comap Prod.swap f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse Prod.swap_swap_eq Prod.swap_swap_eq
#align filter.map_swap_eq_comap_swap Filter.map_swap_eq_comap_swap
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_eq_comap {f : Filter ((α × β) × γ × δ)} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) f =
comap (fun p : (α × γ) × β × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse (funext fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl) (funext fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl)
#align filter.map_swap4_eq_comap Filter.map_swap4_eq_comap
theorem le_map {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {g : Filter β} (h : ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g) : g ≤ f.map m :=
fun _ hs => mem_of_superset (h _ hs) <| image_preimage_subset _ _
#align filter.le_map Filter.le_map
theorem le_map_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {g : Filter β} : g ≤ f.map m ↔ ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g :=
⟨fun h _ hs => h (image_mem_map hs), le_map⟩
#align filter.le_map_iff Filter.le_map_iff
protected theorem push_pull (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) = map f F ⊓ G := by
apply le_antisymm
· calc
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) ≤ map f F ⊓ (map f <| comap f G) := map_inf_le
_ ≤ map f F ⊓ G := inf_le_inf_left (map f F) map_comap_le
· rintro U ⟨V, V_in, W, ⟨Z, Z_in, hZ⟩, h⟩
apply mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map V_in) Z_in
calc
f '' V ∩ Z = f '' (V ∩ f ⁻¹' Z) := by rw [image_inter_preimage]
_ ⊆ f '' (V ∩ W) := image_subset _ (inter_subset_inter_right _ ‹_›)
_ = f '' (f ⁻¹' U) := by rw [h]
_ ⊆ U := image_preimage_subset f U
#align filter.push_pull Filter.push_pull
protected theorem push_pull' (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
map f (comap f G ⊓ F) = G ⊓ map f F := by simp only [Filter.push_pull, inf_comm]
#align filter.push_pull' Filter.push_pull'
theorem principal_eq_map_coe_top (s : Set α) : 𝓟 s = map ((↑) : s → α) ⊤ := by simp
#align filter.principal_eq_map_coe_top Filter.principal_eq_map_coe_top
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
F ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ comap ((↑) : s → α) F = ⊥ := by
rw [principal_eq_map_coe_top s, ← Filter.push_pull', inf_top_eq, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap
section Applicative
theorem singleton_mem_pure {a : α} : {a} ∈ (pure a : Filter α) :=
mem_singleton a
#align filter.singleton_mem_pure Filter.singleton_mem_pure
theorem pure_injective : Injective (pure : α → Filter α) := fun a _ hab =>
(Filter.ext_iff.1 hab { x | a = x }).1 rfl
#align filter.pure_injective Filter.pure_injective
instance pure_neBot {α : Type u} {a : α} : NeBot (pure a) :=
⟨mt empty_mem_iff_bot.2 <| not_mem_empty a⟩
#align filter.pure_ne_bot Filter.pure_neBot
@[simp]
theorem le_pure_iff {f : Filter α} {a : α} : f ≤ pure a ↔ {a} ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_singleton, le_principal_iff]
#align filter.le_pure_iff Filter.le_pure_iff
theorem mem_seq_def {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, (x : α → β) y ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_seq_def Filter.mem_seq_def
theorem mem_seq_iff {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Set.seq u t ⊆ s := by
simp only [mem_seq_def, seq_subset, exists_prop, iff_self_iff]
#align filter.mem_seq_iff Filter.mem_seq_iff
theorem mem_map_seq_iff {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {m : α → β → γ} {s : Set γ} :
s ∈ (f.map m).seq g ↔ ∃ t u, t ∈ g ∧ u ∈ f ∧ ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, m x y ∈ s :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hts⟩ => ⟨s, m ⁻¹' t, hs, ht, fun _ => hts _⟩)
fun ⟨t, s, ht, hs, hts⟩ =>
⟨m '' s, image_mem_map hs, t, ht, fun _ ⟨_, has, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ hts _ has⟩
#align filter.mem_map_seq_iff Filter.mem_map_seq_iff
theorem seq_mem_seq {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : s.seq t ∈ f.seq g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun f hf a ha => ⟨f, hf, a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.seq_mem_seq Filter.seq_mem_seq
theorem le_seq {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {h : Filter β}
(hh : ∀ t ∈ f, ∀ u ∈ g, Set.seq t u ∈ h) : h ≤ seq f g := fun _ ⟨_, ht, _, hu, hs⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hh _ ht _ hu) fun _ ⟨_, hm, _, ha, eq⟩ => eq ▸ hs _ hm _ ha
#align filter.le_seq Filter.le_seq
@[mono]
theorem seq_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (α → β)} {g₁ g₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.seq g₁ ≤ f₂.seq g₂ :=
le_seq fun _ hs _ ht => seq_mem_seq (hf hs) (hg ht)
#align filter.seq_mono Filter.seq_mono
@[simp]
theorem pure_seq_eq_map (g : α → β) (f : Filter α) : seq (pure g) f = f.map g := by
refine le_antisymm (le_map fun s hs => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rw [← singleton_seq]
apply seq_mem_seq _ hs
exact singleton_mem_pure
· refine sets_of_superset (map g f) (image_mem_map ht) ?_
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩
#align filter.pure_seq_eq_map Filter.pure_seq_eq_map
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,884 | 2,890 | theorem seq_pure (f : Filter (α → β)) (a : α) : seq f (pure a) = map (fun g : α → β => g a) f := by |
refine le_antisymm (le_map fun s hs => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rw [← seq_singleton]
exact seq_mem_seq hs singleton_mem_pure
· refine sets_of_superset (map (fun g : α → β => g a) f) (image_mem_map hs) ?_
rintro b ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hg, a, ht, rfl⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.function.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
/-!
# Measurability of `⌊x⌋` etc
In this file we prove that `Int.floor`, `Int.ceil`, `Int.fract`, `Nat.floor`, and `Nat.ceil` are
measurable under some assumptions on the (semi)ring.
-/
open Set
section FloorRing
variable {α R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [LinearOrderedRing R] [FloorRing R] [TopologicalSpace R]
[OrderTopology R] [MeasurableSpace R]
theorem Int.measurable_floor [OpensMeasurableSpace R] : Measurable (Int.floor : R → ℤ) :=
measurable_to_countable fun x => by
simpa only [Int.preimage_floor_singleton] using measurableSet_Ico
#align int.measurable_floor Int.measurable_floor
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.floor [OpensMeasurableSpace R] {f : α → R} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun x => ⌊f x⌋ :=
Int.measurable_floor.comp hf
#align measurable.floor Measurable.floor
theorem Int.measurable_ceil [OpensMeasurableSpace R] : Measurable (Int.ceil : R → ℤ) :=
measurable_to_countable fun x => by
simpa only [Int.preimage_ceil_singleton] using measurableSet_Ioc
#align int.measurable_ceil Int.measurable_ceil
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.ceil [OpensMeasurableSpace R] {f : α → R} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun x => ⌈f x⌉ :=
Int.measurable_ceil.comp hf
#align measurable.ceil Measurable.ceil
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Floor.lean | 47 | 50 | theorem measurable_fract [BorelSpace R] : Measurable (Int.fract : R → R) := by |
intro s hs
rw [Int.preimage_fract]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun z => measurable_id.sub_const _ (hs.inter measurableSet_Ico)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Floris van Doorn, Gabriel Ebner, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"52fa514ec337dd970d71d8de8d0fd68b455a1e54"
/-!
# Conditionally complete linear order structure on `ℕ`
In this file we
* define a `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot` structure on `ℕ`;
* prove a few lemmas about `iSup`/`iInf`/`Set.iUnion`/`Set.iInter` and natural numbers.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Nat
open scoped Classical
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, n ∈ s then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h else 0⟩
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h else 0⟩
theorem sInf_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h :=
dif_pos _
#align nat.Inf_def Nat.sInf_def
theorem sSup_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) :
sSup s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h :=
dif_pos _
#align nat.Sup_def Nat.sSup_def
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Infinite) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦
let ⟨k, hks, hk⟩ := h.exists_gt n
(hn k hks).not_lt hk
#align set.infinite.nat.Sup_eq_zero Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} : sInf s = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s ∨ s = ∅ := by
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h
simp only [or_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, iff_true_iff, iInf, InfSet.sInf,
mem_empty_iff_false, exists_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
| inr h => simp only [h.ne_empty, or_false_iff, Nat.sInf_def, h, Nat.find_eq_zero]
#align nat.Inf_eq_zero Nat.sInf_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = 0 := by
rw [sInf_eq_zero]
right
rfl
#align nat.Inf_empty Nat.sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInf_of_empty {ι : Sort*} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℕ) : iInf f = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
#align nat.infi_of_empty Nat.iInf_of_empty
/-- This combines `Nat.iInf_of_empty` with `ciInf_const`. -/
@[simp]
lemma iInf_const_zero {ι : Sort*} : ⨅ i : ι, 0 = 0 :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty ι).elim (fun h ↦ by simp) fun h ↦ sInf_eq_zero.2 <| by simp
theorem sInf_mem {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s := by
rw [Nat.sInf_def h]
exact Nat.find_spec h
#align nat.Inf_mem Nat.sInf_mem
theorem not_mem_of_lt_sInf {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m < sInf s) : m ∉ s := by
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h; apply not_mem_empty
| inr h => rw [Nat.sInf_def h] at hm; exact Nat.find_min h hm
#align nat.not_mem_of_lt_Inf Nat.not_mem_of_lt_sInf
protected theorem sInf_le {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ m := by
rw [Nat.sInf_def ⟨m, hm⟩]
exact Nat.find_min' ⟨m, hm⟩ hm
#align nat.Inf_le Nat.sInf_le
theorem nonempty_of_pos_sInf {s : Set ℕ} (h : 0 < sInf s) : s.Nonempty := by
by_contra contra
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at contra
have h' : sInf s ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt h
apply h'
rw [Nat.sInf_eq_zero]
right
assumption
#align nat.nonempty_of_pos_Inf Nat.nonempty_of_pos_sInf
theorem nonempty_of_sInf_eq_succ {s : Set ℕ} {k : ℕ} (h : sInf s = k + 1) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_pos_sInf (h.symm ▸ succ_pos k : sInf s > 0)
#align nat.nonempty_of_Inf_eq_succ Nat.nonempty_of_sInf_eq_succ
theorem eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed {s : Set ℕ} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hs' : ∀ k₁ k₂ : ℕ, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s) : s = Ici (sInf s) :=
ext fun n ↦ ⟨fun H ↦ Nat.sInf_le H, fun H ↦ hs' (sInf s) n H (sInf_mem hs)⟩
#align nat.eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed Nat.eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed
theorem sInf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff {s : Set ℕ} (hs : ∀ k₁ k₂ : ℕ, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s)
(k : ℕ) : sInf s = k + 1 ↔ k + 1 ∈ s ∧ k ∉ s := by
constructor
· intro H
rw [eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed (nonempty_of_sInf_eq_succ _) hs, H, mem_Ici, mem_Ici]
· exact ⟨le_rfl, k.not_succ_le_self⟩;
· exact k
· assumption
· rintro ⟨H, H'⟩
rw [sInf_def (⟨_, H⟩ : s.Nonempty), find_eq_iff]
exact ⟨H, fun n hnk hns ↦ H' <| hs n k (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp hnk) hns⟩
#align nat.Inf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff Nat.sInf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff
/-- This instance is necessary, otherwise the lattice operations would be derived via
`ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot` and marked as noncomputable. -/
instance : Lattice ℕ :=
LinearOrder.toLattice
noncomputable instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ℕ :=
{ (inferInstance : OrderBot ℕ), (LinearOrder.toLattice : Lattice ℕ),
(inferInstance : LinearOrder ℕ) with
-- sup := sSup -- Porting note: removed, unnecessary?
-- inf := sInf -- Porting note: removed, unnecessary?
le_csSup := fun s a hb ha ↦ by rw [sSup_def hb]; revert a ha; exact @Nat.find_spec _ _ hb
csSup_le := fun s a _ ha ↦ by rw [sSup_def ⟨a, ha⟩]; exact Nat.find_min' _ ha
le_csInf := fun s a hs hb ↦ by
rw [sInf_def hs]; exact hb (@Nat.find_spec (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ _)
csInf_le := fun s a _ ha ↦ by rw [sInf_def ⟨a, ha⟩]; exact Nat.find_min' _ ha
csSup_empty := by
simp only [sSup_def, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, forall_const, forall_prop_of_false,
not_false_iff, exists_const]
apply bot_unique (Nat.find_min' _ _)
trivial
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := by
intro s hs
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left, sSup,
mem_empty_iff_false, IsEmpty.forall_iff, forall_const, exists_const, dite_true]
rw [dif_neg]
· exact le_antisymm (zero_le _) (find_le trivial)
· exact hs
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s hs ↦ by simp at hs }
theorem sSup_mem {s : Set ℕ} (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddAbove s) : sSup s ∈ s :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h₂
h₁.csSup_mem ((finite_le_nat k).subset hk)
#align nat.Sup_mem Nat.sSup_mem
theorem sInf_add {n : ℕ} {p : ℕ → Prop} (hn : n ≤ sInf { m | p m }) :
sInf { m | p (m + n) } + n = sInf { m | p m } := by
obtain h | ⟨m, hm⟩ := { m | p (m + n) }.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [h, Nat.sInf_empty, zero_add]
obtain hnp | hnp := hn.eq_or_lt
· exact hnp
suffices hp : p (sInf { m | p m } - n + n) from (h.subset hp).elim
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel hn]
exact csInf_mem (nonempty_of_pos_sInf <| n.zero_le.trans_lt hnp)
· have hp : ∃ n, n ∈ { m | p m } := ⟨_, hm⟩
rw [Nat.sInf_def ⟨m, hm⟩, Nat.sInf_def hp]
rw [Nat.sInf_def hp] at hn
exact find_add hn
#align nat.Inf_add Nat.sInf_add
theorem sInf_add' {n : ℕ} {p : ℕ → Prop} (h : 0 < sInf { m | p m }) :
sInf { m | p m } + n = sInf { m | p (m - n) } := by
suffices h₁ : n ≤ sInf {m | p (m - n)} by
convert sInf_add h₁
simp_rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := nonempty_of_pos_sInf h
refine
le_csInf ⟨m + n, ?_⟩ fun b hb ↦
le_of_not_lt fun hbn ↦
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ?_ (not_mem_of_lt_sInf h) (Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le hbn.le)
· dsimp
rwa [Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
· exact hb
#align nat.Inf_add' Nat.sInf_add'
section
variable {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α]
theorem iSup_lt_succ (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ k < n + 1, u k = (⨆ k < n, u k) ⊔ u n := by
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq, iSup_or, iSup_sup_eq]
#align nat.supr_lt_succ Nat.iSup_lt_succ
theorem iSup_lt_succ' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ k < n + 1, u k = u 0 ⊔ ⨆ k < n, u (k + 1) := by
rw [← sup_iSup_nat_succ]
simp
#align nat.supr_lt_succ' Nat.iSup_lt_succ'
theorem iInf_lt_succ (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨅ k < n + 1, u k = (⨅ k < n, u k) ⊓ u n :=
@iSup_lt_succ αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align nat.infi_lt_succ Nat.iInf_lt_succ
theorem iInf_lt_succ' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨅ k < n + 1, u k = u 0 ⊓ ⨅ k < n, u (k + 1) :=
@iSup_lt_succ' αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align nat.infi_lt_succ' Nat.iInf_lt_succ'
theorem iSup_le_succ (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ k ≤ n + 1, u k = (⨆ k ≤ n, u k) ⊔ u (n + 1) := by
simp_rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, iSup_lt_succ]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Lattice.lean | 211 | 212 | theorem iSup_le_succ' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ k ≤ n + 1, u k = u 0 ⊔ ⨆ k ≤ n, u (k + 1) := by |
simp_rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, iSup_lt_succ']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
#align_import data.num.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
/-
Porting note:
`bit0` and `bit1` are deprecated because it is mainly used to represent number literal in Lean3 but
not in Lean4 anymore. However, this file uses them for encoding numbers so this linter is
unnecessary.
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false
-- Porting note: Required for the notation `-[n+1]`.
open Int Function
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_one PosNum.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_one' PosNum.cast_one'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 (n : α) :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_bit0 PosNum.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = _root_.bit1 (n : α) :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_bit1 PosNum.cast_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => (Nat.cast_bit0 _).trans <| congr_arg _root_.bit0 p.cast_to_nat
| bit1 p => (Nat.cast_bit1 _).trans <| congr_arg _root_.bit1 p.cast_to_nat
#align pos_num.cast_to_nat PosNum.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
#align pos_num.to_nat_to_int PosNum.to_nat_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_to_int PosNum.cast_to_int
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit0 (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
#align pos_num.succ_to_nat PosNum.succ_to_nat
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.one_add PosNum.one_add
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.add_one PosNum.add_one
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg _root_.bit0 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
#align pos_num.add_to_nat PosNum.add_to_nat
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 a, bit0 b => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 a, bit0 b => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
#align pos_num.add_succ PosNum.add_succ
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, _root_.bit0 n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (_root_.bit0 p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
#align pos_num.bit0_of_bit0 PosNum.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : _root_.bit1 n = bit1 n :=
show _root_.bit0 n + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
#align pos_num.bit1_of_bit1 PosNum.bit1_of_bit1
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
#align pos_num.mul_to_nat PosNum.mul_to_nat
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
#align pos_num.to_nat_pos PosNum.to_nat_pos
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
#align pos_num.cmp_to_nat_lemma PosNum.cmp_to_nat_lemma
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> cases' n with n n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.cmp_swap PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
#align pos_num.cmp_to_nat PosNum.cmp_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align pos_num.lt_to_nat PosNum.lt_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
#align pos_num.le_to_nat PosNum.le_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.add_zero Num.add_zero
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zero_add Num.zero_add
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
#align num.add_one Num.add_one
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos p, pos q => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
#align num.add_succ Num.add_succ
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
#align num.bit0_of_bit0 Num.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
#align num.bit1_of_bit1 Num.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
#align num.of_nat'_zero Num.ofNat'_zero
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq rfl _ _
#align num.of_nat'_bit Num.ofNat'_bit
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
#align num.of_nat'_one Num.ofNat'_one
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
#align num.bit1_succ Num.bit1_succ
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond, _root_.bit1]
-- Porting note: `cc` was not ported yet so `exact Nat.add_left_comm n 1 1` is used.
· erw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by
simpa [Nat.bit, _root_.bit1, _root_.bit0] using Nat.add_left_comm n 1 1,
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
#align num.of_nat'_succ Num.ofNat'_succ
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
#align num.add_of_nat' Num.add_ofNat'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_zero Num.cast_zero
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_zero' Num.cast_zero'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_one Num.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
#align num.cast_pos Num.cast_pos
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
#align num.succ'_to_nat Num.succ'_to_nat
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
#align num.succ_to_nat Num.succ_to_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
#align num.cast_to_nat Num.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
#align num.add_to_nat Num.add_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
#align num.mul_to_nat Num.mul_to_nat
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos b => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
#align num.cmp_to_nat Num.cmp_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align num.lt_to_nat Num.lt_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
#align num.le_to_nat Num.le_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit false, of_to_nat' p]; rfl
| bit1 p => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true, of_to_nat' p]; rfl
#align pos_num.of_to_nat' PosNum.of_to_nat'
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
#align num.of_to_nat' Num.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) := LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
#align num.to_nat_inj Num.to_nat_inj
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
#align num.add_monoid Num.addMonoid
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
#align num.add_monoid_with_one Num.addMonoidWithOne
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
#align num.comm_semiring Num.commSemiring
instance orderedCancelAddCommMonoid : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid Num where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
#align num.ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid Num.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid
instance linearOrderedSemiring : LinearOrderedSemiring Num :=
{ Num.commSemiring,
Num.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid with
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
decidableLT := Num.decidableLT
decidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
decidableEq := instDecidableEqNum
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
#align num.linear_ordered_semiring Num.linearOrderedSemiring
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
#align num.add_of_nat Num.add_of_nat
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
#align num.to_nat_to_int Num.to_nat_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_to_int Num.cast_to_int
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
#align num.to_of_nat Num.to_of_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
#align num.of_nat_cast Num.of_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias of_nat_cast := of_natCast
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
#align num.of_nat_inj Num.of_nat_inj
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
#align num.of_to_nat Num.of_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
#align num.dvd_to_nat Num.dvd_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
#align pos_num.of_to_nat PosNum.of_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
#align pos_num.to_nat_inj PosNum.to_nat_inj
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (_root_.bit0 n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 n => rfl
#align pos_num.pred'_to_nat PosNum.pred'_to_nat
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
#align pos_num.pred'_succ' PosNum.pred'_succ'
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
#align pos_num.succ'_pred' PosNum.succ'_pred'
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
#align pos_num.has_dvd PosNum.dvd
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
#align pos_num.dvd_to_nat PosNum.dvd_to_nat
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, Nat.size_bit0 <| ne_of_gt <| to_nat_pos n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, Nat.size_bit1]
#align pos_num.size_to_nat PosNum.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
#align pos_num.size_eq_nat_size PosNum.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
#align pos_num.nat_size_to_nat PosNum.natSize_to_nat
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
#align pos_num.nat_size_pos PosNum.natSize_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
#align pos_num.add_comm_semigroup PosNum.addCommSemigroup
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
#align pos_num.comm_monoid PosNum.commMonoid
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
#align pos_num.distrib PosNum.distrib
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
decidableLT := by infer_instance
decidableLE := by infer_instance
decidableEq := by infer_instance
#align pos_num.linear_order PosNum.linearOrder
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
#align pos_num.cast_to_num PosNum.cast_to_num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> rfl
#align pos_num.bit_to_nat PosNum.bit_to_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_add PosNum.cast_add
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
#align pos_num.cast_succ PosNum.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
#align pos_num.cast_inj PosNum.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [LinearOrderedSemiring α] (n : PosNum) : (1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
#align pos_num.one_le_cast PosNum.one_le_cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [LinearOrderedSemiring α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
#align pos_num.cast_pos PosNum.cast_pos
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [Semiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_mul PosNum.cast_mul
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
#align pos_num.cmp_eq PosNum.cmp_eq
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_lt PosNum.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
#align pos_num.cast_le PosNum.cast_le
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align num.bit_to_nat Num.bit_to_nat
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_succ' Num.cast_succ'
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
#align num.cast_succ Num.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [Semiring α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_add Num.cast_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [Semiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, _root_.bit0, cast_add]; rfl
#align num.cast_bit0 Num.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [Semiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = _root_.bit1 (n : α) := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, _root_.bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
#align num.cast_bit1 Num.cast_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [Semiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
#align num.cast_mul Num.cast_mul
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
#align num.size_to_nat Num.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
#align num.size_eq_nat_size Num.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
#align num.nat_size_to_nat Num.natSize_to_nat
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by
rw [ofNat'] at IH ⊢
rw [Nat.binaryRec_eq, IH]
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_bit0` & `Nat.cast_bit1` are not `simp` theorems anymore.
· cases b <;> simp [Nat.bit, bit0_of_bit0, bit1_of_bit1, Nat.cast_bit0, Nat.cast_bit1]
· rfl
#align num.of_nat'_eq Num.ofNat'_eq
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zneg_to_znum Num.zneg_toZNum
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zneg_to_znum_neg Num.zneg_toZNumNeg
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
#align num.to_znum_inj Num.toZNum_inj
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align num.cast_to_znum Num.cast_toZNum
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [AddGroup α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align num.cast_to_znum_neg Num.cast_toZNumNeg
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align num.add_to_znum Num.add_toZNum
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
#align pos_num.pred_to_nat PosNum.pred_to_nat
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
#align pos_num.sub'_one PosNum.sub'_one
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
#align pos_num.one_sub' PosNum.one_sub'
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
#align pos_num.lt_iff_cmp PosNum.lt_iff_cmp
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
#align pos_num.le_iff_cmp PosNum.le_iff_cmp
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
#align num.pred_to_nat Num.pred_to_nat
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
#align num.ppred_to_nat Num.ppred_to_nat
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
#align num.cmp_swap Num.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
#align num.cmp_eq Num.cmp_eq
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
#align num.cast_lt Num.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
#align num.cast_le Num.cast_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
#align num.cast_inj Num.cast_inj
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
#align num.lt_iff_cmp Num.lt_iff_cmp
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
#align num.le_iff_cmp Num.le_iff_cmp
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
cases' m with m <;> cases' n with n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have : ∀ (b) (n : PosNum), (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
intros b _; cases b <;> rfl
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> cases' n with n n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat
rw [show ∀ b n, (pos (PosNum.bit b n) : ℕ) = Nat.bit b ↑n by
intros b _; cases b <;> rfl]
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
#align num.bitwise_to_nat Num.castNum_eq_bitwise
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
-- Porting note: A name of an implicit local hypothesis is not available so
-- `cases_type*` is used.
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.lor_to_nat Num.castNum_or
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.land_to_nat Num.castNum_and
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.ldiff_to_nat Num.castNum_ldiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.lxor_to_nat Num.castNum_ldiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH,
Nat.bit0_val, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
#align num.shiftl_to_nat Num.castNum_shiftLeft
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
cases' m with m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr];
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
cases' m with m m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (_root_.bit1 m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (_root_.bit0 m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val]
#align num.shiftr_to_nat Num.castNum_shiftRight
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
-- Porting note: `unfold` → `dsimp only`
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> cases' m with m m
<;> dsimp only [PosNum.testBit, Nat.zero_eq]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
#align num.test_bit_to_nat Num.castNum_testBit
end Num
namespace ZNum
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ((0 : ZNum) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_zero ZNum.cast_zero
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : (ZNum.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_zero' ZNum.cast_zero'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ((1 : ZNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_one ZNum.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] (n : PosNum) : (pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_pos ZNum.cast_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] (n : PosNum) : (neg n : α) = -n :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_neg ZNum.cast_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zneg [AddGroup α] [One α] : ∀ n, ((-n : ZNum) : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| pos _p => rfl
| neg _p => (neg_neg _).symm
#align znum.cast_zneg ZNum.cast_zneg
theorem neg_zero : (-0 : ZNum) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.neg_zero ZNum.neg_zero
theorem zneg_pos (n : PosNum) : -pos n = neg n :=
rfl
#align znum.zneg_pos ZNum.zneg_pos
theorem zneg_neg (n : PosNum) : -neg n = pos n :=
rfl
#align znum.zneg_neg ZNum.zneg_neg
theorem zneg_zneg (n : ZNum) : - -n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_zneg ZNum.zneg_zneg
theorem zneg_bit1 (n : ZNum) : -n.bit1 = (-n).bitm1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_bit1 ZNum.zneg_bit1
theorem zneg_bitm1 (n : ZNum) : -n.bitm1 = (-n).bit1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_bitm1 ZNum.zneg_bitm1
theorem zneg_succ (n : ZNum) : -n.succ = (-n).pred := by
cases n <;> try { rfl }; rw [succ, Num.zneg_toZNumNeg]; rfl
#align znum.zneg_succ ZNum.zneg_succ
theorem zneg_pred (n : ZNum) : -n.pred = (-n).succ := by
rw [← zneg_zneg (succ (-n)), zneg_succ, zneg_zneg]
#align znum.zneg_pred ZNum.zneg_pred
@[simp]
theorem abs_to_nat : ∀ n, (abs n : ℕ) = Int.natAbs n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg Int.natAbs p.to_nat_to_int
| neg p => show Int.natAbs ((p : ℕ) : ℤ) = Int.natAbs (-p) by rw [p.to_nat_to_int, Int.natAbs_neg]
#align znum.abs_to_nat ZNum.abs_to_nat
@[simp]
theorem abs_toZNum : ∀ n : Num, abs n.toZNum = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align znum.abs_to_znum ZNum.abs_toZNum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, ((n : ℤ) : α) = n
| 0 => by rw [cast_zero, cast_zero, Int.cast_zero]
| pos p => by rw [cast_pos, cast_pos, PosNum.cast_to_int]
| neg p => by rw [cast_neg, cast_neg, Int.cast_neg, PosNum.cast_to_int]
#align znum.cast_to_int ZNum.cast_to_int
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : ZNum, bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos a => congr_arg pos a.bit0_of_bit0
| neg a => congr_arg neg a.bit0_of_bit0
#align znum.bit0_of_bit0 ZNum.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : ZNum, bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos a => congr_arg pos a.bit1_of_bit1
| neg a => show PosNum.sub' 1 (_root_.bit0 a) = _ by rw [PosNum.one_sub', a.bit0_of_bit0]; rfl
#align znum.bit1_of_bit1 ZNum.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, (n.bit0 : α) = bit0 (n : α)
| 0 => (add_zero _).symm
| pos p => by rw [ZNum.bit0, cast_pos, cast_pos]; rfl
| neg p => by
rw [ZNum.bit0, cast_neg, cast_neg, PosNum.cast_bit0, _root_.bit0, _root_.bit0, neg_add_rev]
#align znum.cast_bit0 ZNum.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, (n.bit1 : α) = bit1 (n : α)
| 0 => by simp [ZNum.bit1, _root_.bit1, _root_.bit0]
| pos p => by rw [ZNum.bit1, cast_pos, cast_pos]; rfl
| neg p => by
rw [ZNum.bit1, cast_neg, cast_neg]
cases' e : pred' p with a <;>
have ep : p = _ := (succ'_pred' p).symm.trans (congr_arg Num.succ' e)
· conv at ep => change p = 1
subst p
simp [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0]
-- Porting note: `rw [Num.succ']` yields a `match` pattern.
· dsimp only [Num.succ'] at ep
subst p
have : (↑(-↑a : ℤ) : α) = -1 + ↑(-↑a + 1 : ℤ) := by simp [add_comm (- ↑a : ℤ) 1]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0] using this
#align znum.cast_bit1 ZNum.cast_bit1
@[simp]
theorem cast_bitm1 [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : ZNum) : (n.bitm1 : α) = bit0 (n : α) - 1 := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← zneg_zneg n]
rw [← zneg_bit1, cast_zneg, cast_bit1]
have : ((-1 + n + n : ℤ) : α) = (n + n + -1 : ℤ) := by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
#align znum.cast_bitm1 ZNum.cast_bitm1
theorem add_zero (n : ZNum) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.add_zero ZNum.add_zero
theorem zero_add (n : ZNum) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zero_add ZNum.zero_add
theorem add_one : ∀ n : ZNum, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.add_one
| neg p => by cases p <;> rfl
#align znum.add_one ZNum.add_one
end ZNum
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
theorem cast_to_znum : ∀ n : PosNum, (n : ZNum) = ZNum.pos n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => (ZNum.bit0_of_bit0 p).trans <| congr_arg _ (cast_to_znum p)
| bit1 p => (ZNum.bit1_of_bit1 p).trans <| congr_arg _ (cast_to_znum p)
#align pos_num.cast_to_znum PosNum.cast_to_znum
theorem cast_sub' [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ m n : PosNum, (sub' m n : α) = m - n
| a, 1 => by
rw [sub'_one, Num.cast_toZNum, ← Num.cast_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, ← Nat.sub_one]
simp [PosNum.cast_pos]
| 1, b => by
rw [one_sub', Num.cast_toZNumNeg, ← neg_sub, neg_inj, ← Num.cast_to_nat, pred'_to_nat,
← Nat.sub_one]
simp [PosNum.cast_pos]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit0, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((a + -b + (a + -b) : ℤ) : α) = a + a + (-b + -b) := by simp [add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bitm1, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + (-b + -1)) : ℤ) : α) = (a + -1 + (-b + -b) : ℤ) := by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit1, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + (-b + 1)) : ℤ) : α) = (a + 1 + (-b + -b) : ℤ) := by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit0, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + -b) : ℤ) : α) = a + (-b + -b) := by simp [add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
#align pos_num.cast_sub' PosNum.cast_sub'
theorem to_nat_eq_succ_pred (n : PosNum) : (n : ℕ) = n.pred' + 1 := by
rw [← Num.succ'_to_nat, n.succ'_pred']
#align pos_num.to_nat_eq_succ_pred PosNum.to_nat_eq_succ_pred
theorem to_int_eq_succ_pred (n : PosNum) : (n : ℤ) = (n.pred' : ℕ) + 1 := by
rw [← n.to_nat_to_int, to_nat_eq_succ_pred]; rfl
#align pos_num.to_int_eq_succ_pred PosNum.to_int_eq_succ_pred
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ m n : Num, (sub' m n : α) = m - n
| 0, 0 => (sub_zero _).symm
| pos _a, 0 => (sub_zero _).symm
| 0, pos _b => (zero_sub _).symm
| pos _a, pos _b => PosNum.cast_sub' _ _
#align num.cast_sub' Num.cast_sub'
theorem toZNum_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.succ.toZNum = n.toZNum.succ
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
#align num.to_znum_succ Num.toZNum_succ
theorem toZNumNeg_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.succ.toZNumNeg = n.toZNumNeg.pred
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
#align num.to_znum_neg_succ Num.toZNumNeg_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ : ∀ n : ZNum, n.pred.succ = n
| 0 => rfl
| ZNum.neg p => show toZNumNeg (pos p).succ'.pred' = _ by rw [PosNum.pred'_succ']; rfl
| ZNum.pos p => by rw [ZNum.pred, ← toZNum_succ, Num.succ, PosNum.succ'_pred', toZNum]
#align num.pred_succ Num.pred_succ
-- Porting note: `erw [ZNum.ofInt', ZNum.ofInt']` yields `match` so
-- `change` & `dsimp` are required.
theorem succ_ofInt' : ∀ n, ZNum.ofInt' (n + 1) = ZNum.ofInt' n + 1
| (n : ℕ) => by
change ZNum.ofInt' (n + 1 : ℕ) = ZNum.ofInt' (n : ℕ) + 1
dsimp only [ZNum.ofInt', ZNum.ofInt']
rw [Num.ofNat'_succ, Num.add_one, toZNum_succ, ZNum.add_one]
| -[0+1] => by
change ZNum.ofInt' 0 = ZNum.ofInt' (-[0+1]) + 1
dsimp only [ZNum.ofInt', ZNum.ofInt']
rw [ofNat'_succ, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| -[(n + 1)+1] => by
change ZNum.ofInt' -[n+1] = ZNum.ofInt' -[(n + 1)+1] + 1
dsimp only [ZNum.ofInt', ZNum.ofInt']
rw [@Num.ofNat'_succ (n + 1), Num.add_one, toZNumNeg_succ,
@ofNat'_succ n, Num.add_one, ZNum.add_one, pred_succ]
#align num.succ_of_int' Num.succ_ofInt'
theorem ofInt'_toZNum : ∀ n : ℕ, toZNum n = ZNum.ofInt' n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, toZNum_succ, ofInt'_toZNum n, Nat.cast_succ, succ_ofInt',
ZNum.add_one]
#align num.of_int'_to_znum Num.ofInt'_toZNum
theorem mem_ofZNum' : ∀ {m : Num} {n : ZNum}, m ∈ ofZNum' n ↔ n = toZNum m
| 0, 0 => ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
| pos m, 0 => ⟨nofun, nofun⟩
| m, ZNum.pos p =>
Option.some_inj.trans <| by cases m <;> constructor <;> intro h <;> try cases h <;> rfl
| m, ZNum.neg p => ⟨nofun, fun h => by cases m <;> cases h⟩
#align num.mem_of_znum' Num.mem_ofZNum'
theorem ofZNum'_toNat : ∀ n : ZNum, (↑) <$> ofZNum' n = Int.toNat' n
| 0 => rfl
| ZNum.pos p => show _ = Int.toNat' p by rw [← PosNum.to_nat_to_int p]; rfl
| ZNum.neg p =>
(congr_arg fun x => Int.toNat' (-x)) <|
show ((p.pred' + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = p by rw [← succ'_to_nat]; simp
#align num.of_znum'_to_nat Num.ofZNum'_toNat
@[simp]
theorem ofZNum_toNat : ∀ n : ZNum, (ofZNum n : ℕ) = Int.toNat n
| 0 => rfl
| ZNum.pos p => show _ = Int.toNat p by rw [← PosNum.to_nat_to_int p]; rfl
| ZNum.neg p =>
(congr_arg fun x => Int.toNat (-x)) <|
show ((p.pred' + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = p by rw [← succ'_to_nat]; simp
#align num.of_znum_to_nat Num.ofZNum_toNat
@[simp]
theorem cast_ofZNum [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : ZNum) : (ofZNum n : α) = Int.toNat n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ofZNum_toNat]
#align num.cast_of_znum Num.cast_ofZNum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem sub_to_nat (m n) : ((m - n : Num) : ℕ) = m - n :=
show (ofZNum _ : ℕ) = _ by
rw [ofZNum_toNat, cast_sub', ← to_nat_to_int, ← to_nat_to_int, Int.toNat_sub]
#align num.sub_to_nat Num.sub_to_nat
end Num
namespace ZNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ m n, ((m + n : ZNum) : α) = m + n
| 0, a => by cases a <;> exact (_root_.zero_add _).symm
| b, 0 => by cases b <;> exact (_root_.add_zero _).symm
| pos a, pos b => PosNum.cast_add _ _
| pos a, neg b => by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using PosNum.cast_sub' (α := α) _ _
| neg a, pos b =>
have : (↑b + -↑a : α) = -↑a + ↑b := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_int a, ← PosNum.cast_to_int b, ← Int.cast_neg, ← Int.cast_add (-a)]
simp [add_comm]
(PosNum.cast_sub' _ _).trans <| (sub_eq_add_neg _ _).trans this
| neg a, neg b =>
show -(↑(a + b) : α) = -a + -b by
rw [PosNum.cast_add, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, neg_neg,
← PosNum.cast_to_int a, ← PosNum.cast_to_int b, ← Int.cast_add, ← Int.cast_add, add_comm]
#align znum.cast_add ZNum.cast_add
@[simp]
theorem cast_succ [AddGroupWithOne α] (n) : ((succ n : ZNum) : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
#align znum.cast_succ ZNum.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_int : ∀ m n, ((m * n : ZNum) : ℤ) = m * n
| 0, a => by cases a <;> exact (zero_mul _).symm
| b, 0 => by cases b <;> exact (mul_zero _).symm
| pos a, pos b => PosNum.cast_mul a b
| pos a, neg b => show -↑(a * b) = ↑a * -↑b by rw [PosNum.cast_mul, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg]
| neg a, pos b => show -↑(a * b) = -↑a * ↑b by rw [PosNum.cast_mul, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
| neg a, neg b => show ↑(a * b) = -↑a * -↑b by rw [PosNum.cast_mul, neg_mul_neg]
#align znum.mul_to_int ZNum.mul_to_int
theorem cast_mul [Ring α] (m n) : ((m * n : ZNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_int, mul_to_int, Int.cast_mul, cast_to_int, cast_to_int]
#align znum.cast_mul ZNum.cast_mul
theorem ofInt'_neg : ∀ n : ℤ, ofInt' (-n) = -ofInt' n
| -[n+1] => show ofInt' (n + 1 : ℕ) = _ by simp only [ofInt', Num.zneg_toZNumNeg]
| 0 => show Num.toZNum (Num.ofNat' 0) = -Num.toZNum (Num.ofNat' 0) by rw [Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => show Num.toZNumNeg _ = -Num.toZNum _ by rw [Num.zneg_toZNum]
#align znum.of_int'_neg ZNum.ofInt'_neg
-- Porting note: `erw [ofInt']` yields `match` so `dsimp` is required.
theorem of_to_int' : ∀ n : ZNum, ZNum.ofInt' n = n
| 0 => by dsimp [ofInt', cast_zero]; erw [Num.ofNat'_zero, Num.toZNum]
| pos a => by rw [cast_pos, ← PosNum.cast_to_nat, ← Num.ofInt'_toZNum, PosNum.of_to_nat]; rfl
| neg a => by
rw [cast_neg, ofInt'_neg, ← PosNum.cast_to_nat, ← Num.ofInt'_toZNum, PosNum.of_to_nat]; rfl
#align znum.of_to_int' ZNum.of_to_int'
theorem to_int_inj {m n : ZNum} : (m : ℤ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_int' h, congr_arg _⟩
#align znum.to_int_inj ZNum.to_int_inj
theorem cmp_to_int : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℤ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℤ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]
cases PosNum.cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> [simp; exact congr_arg pos; simp [GT.gt]]
| neg a, neg b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat b a; revert this; dsimp [cmp]
cases PosNum.cmp b a <;> dsimp <;> [simp; simp (config := { contextual := true }); simp [GT.gt]]
| pos a, 0 => PosNum.cast_pos _
| pos a, neg b => lt_trans (neg_lt_zero.2 <| PosNum.cast_pos _) (PosNum.cast_pos _)
| 0, neg b => neg_lt_zero.2 <| PosNum.cast_pos _
| neg a, 0 => neg_lt_zero.2 <| PosNum.cast_pos _
| neg a, pos b => lt_trans (neg_lt_zero.2 <| PosNum.cast_pos _) (PosNum.cast_pos _)
| 0, pos b => PosNum.cast_pos _
#align znum.cmp_to_int ZNum.cmp_to_int
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_int {m n : ZNum} : (m : ℤ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℤ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_int m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align znum.lt_to_int ZNum.lt_to_int
theorem le_to_int {m n : ZNum} : (m : ℤ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_int
#align znum.le_to_int ZNum.le_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedRing α] {m n : ZNum} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_int m, ← cast_to_int n, Int.cast_lt, lt_to_int]
#align znum.cast_lt ZNum.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedRing α] {m n : ZNum} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
#align znum.cast_le ZNum.cast_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [LinearOrderedRing α] {m n : ZNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_int m, ← cast_to_int n, Int.cast_inj (α := α), to_int_inj]
#align znum.cast_inj ZNum.cast_inj
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `ZNum`s to one about `Int`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : ZNum) (m : ZNum) : n ≤ n + m * m := by
transfer_rw
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_int_inj] | rw [← lt_to_int] | rw [← le_to_int]
repeat first | rw [cast_add] | rw [mul_to_int] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `ZNum`s by transferring them to the `Int` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : ZNum) (m : ZNum) : n ≤ n + m * m := by
transfer
exact mul_self_nonneg _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder ZNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name, generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
decidableEq := instDecidableEqZNum
decidableLE := ZNum.decidableLE
decidableLT := ZNum.decidableLT
#align znum.linear_order ZNum.linearOrder
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid ZNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup ZNum :=
{ ZNum.addMonoid with
add_comm := by transfer
neg := Neg.neg
zsmul := zsmulRec
add_left_neg := by transfer }
#align znum.add_comm_group ZNum.addCommGroup
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne ZNum :=
{ ZNum.addMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := fun n => ZNum.ofInt' n
natCast_zero := show (Num.ofNat' 0).toZNum = 0 by rw [Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
natCast_succ := fun n =>
show (Num.ofNat' (n + 1)).toZNum = (Num.ofNat' n).toZNum + 1 by
rw [Num.ofNat'_succ, Num.add_one, Num.toZNum_succ, ZNum.add_one] }
#align znum.add_monoid_with_one ZNum.addMonoidWithOne
-- Porting note: These theorems should be declared out of the instance, otherwise timeouts.
private theorem mul_comm : ∀ (a b : ZNum), a * b = b * a := by transfer
private theorem add_le_add_left : ∀ (a b : ZNum), a ≤ b → ∀ (c : ZNum), c + a ≤ c + b := by
intro a b h c
revert h
transfer_rw
exact fun h => _root_.add_le_add_left h c
instance linearOrderedCommRing : LinearOrderedCommRing ZNum :=
{ ZNum.linearOrder, ZNum.addCommGroup, ZNum.addMonoidWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc := by transfer
zero_mul := by transfer
mul_zero := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
left_distrib := by
transfer
simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by
transfer
simp [mul_add, _root_.mul_comm]
mul_comm := mul_comm
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩
add_le_add_left := add_le_add_left
mul_pos := fun a b =>
show 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b by
transfer_rw
apply mul_pos
zero_le_one := by decide }
#align znum.linear_ordered_comm_ring ZNum.linearOrderedCommRing
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_sub [Ring α] (m n) : ((m - n : ZNum) : α) = m - n := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align znum.cast_sub ZNum.cast_sub
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem neg_of_int : ∀ n, ((-n : ℤ) : ZNum) = -n
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => rfl
| 0 => by rw [Int.cast_neg]
| -[n+1] => (zneg_zneg _).symm
#align znum.neg_of_int ZNum.neg_of_int
@[simp]
theorem ofInt'_eq : ∀ n : ℤ, ZNum.ofInt' n = n
| (n : ℕ) => rfl
| -[n+1] => by
show Num.toZNumNeg (n + 1 : ℕ) = -(n + 1 : ℕ)
rw [← neg_inj, neg_neg, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.zneg_toZNumNeg, Num.toZNum_succ,
Nat.cast_succ, ZNum.add_one]
rfl
#align znum.of_int'_eq ZNum.ofInt'_eq
@[simp]
theorem of_nat_toZNum (n : ℕ) : Num.toZNum n = n :=
rfl
#align znum.of_nat_to_znum ZNum.of_nat_toZNum
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_int`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_int (n : ZNum) : ((n : ℤ) : ZNum) = n := by rw [← ofInt'_eq, of_to_int']
#align znum.of_to_int ZNum.of_to_int
theorem to_of_int (n : ℤ) : ((n : ZNum) : ℤ) = n :=
Int.inductionOn' n 0 (by simp) (by simp) (by simp)
#align znum.to_of_int ZNum.to_of_int
@[simp]
theorem of_nat_toZNumNeg (n : ℕ) : Num.toZNumNeg n = -n := by rw [← of_nat_toZNum, Num.zneg_toZNum]
#align znum.of_nat_to_znum_neg ZNum.of_nat_toZNumNeg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_intCast [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : ℤ) : ((n : ZNum) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_int, to_of_int]
#align znum.of_int_cast ZNum.of_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias of_int_cast := of_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,552 | 1,553 | theorem of_natCast [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : ZNum) : α) = n := by |
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, of_intCast, Int.cast_natCast]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Antilipschitz
#align_import topology.metric_space.isometry from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b1859b6d4636fdbb78c5d5cefd24530653cfd3eb"
/-!
# Isometries
We define isometries, i.e., maps between emetric spaces that preserve
the edistance (on metric spaces, these are exactly the maps that preserve distances),
and prove their basic properties. We also introduce isometric bijections.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `eq_of_dist_eq_zero` we start setting up the
theory for `PseudoMetricSpace` and we specialize to `MetricSpace` when needed.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Function Set
open scoped Topology ENNReal
/-- An isometry (also known as isometric embedding) is a map preserving the edistance
between pseudoemetric spaces, or equivalently the distance between pseudometric space. -/
def Isometry [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ x1 x2 : α, edist (f x1) (f x2) = edist x1 x2
#align isometry Isometry
/-- On pseudometric spaces, a map is an isometry if and only if it preserves nonnegative
distances. -/
theorem isometry_iff_nndist_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x y, nndist (f x) (f y) = nndist x y := by
simp only [Isometry, edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_inj]
#align isometry_iff_nndist_eq isometry_iff_nndist_eq
/-- On pseudometric spaces, a map is an isometry if and only if it preserves distances. -/
theorem isometry_iff_dist_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) = dist x y := by
simp only [isometry_iff_nndist_eq, ← coe_nndist, NNReal.coe_inj]
#align isometry_iff_dist_eq isometry_iff_dist_eq
/-- An isometry preserves distances. -/
alias ⟨Isometry.dist_eq, _⟩ := isometry_iff_dist_eq
#align isometry.dist_eq Isometry.dist_eq
/-- A map that preserves distances is an isometry -/
alias ⟨_, Isometry.of_dist_eq⟩ := isometry_iff_dist_eq
#align isometry.of_dist_eq Isometry.of_dist_eq
/-- An isometry preserves non-negative distances. -/
alias ⟨Isometry.nndist_eq, _⟩ := isometry_iff_nndist_eq
#align isometry.nndist_eq Isometry.nndist_eq
/-- A map that preserves non-negative distances is an isometry. -/
alias ⟨_, Isometry.of_nndist_eq⟩ := isometry_iff_nndist_eq
#align isometry.of_nndist_eq Isometry.of_nndist_eq
namespace Isometry
section PseudoEmetricIsometry
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {f : α → β} {x y z : α} {s : Set α}
/-- An isometry preserves edistances. -/
theorem edist_eq (hf : Isometry f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) = edist x y :=
hf x y
#align isometry.edist_eq Isometry.edist_eq
theorem lipschitz (h : Isometry f) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun x y => (h x y).le
#align isometry.lipschitz Isometry.lipschitz
theorem antilipschitz (h : Isometry f) : AntilipschitzWith 1 f := fun x y => by
simp only [h x y, ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, le_refl]
#align isometry.antilipschitz Isometry.antilipschitz
/-- Any map on a subsingleton is an isometry -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem _root_.isometry_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : Isometry f := fun x y => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x y]; simp
#align isometry_subsingleton isometry_subsingleton
/-- The identity is an isometry -/
theorem _root_.isometry_id : Isometry (id : α → α) := fun _ _ => rfl
#align isometry_id isometry_id
theorem prod_map {δ} [PseudoEMetricSpace δ] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ} (hf : Isometry f)
(hg : Isometry g) : Isometry (Prod.map f g) := fun x y => by
simp only [Prod.edist_eq, hf.edist_eq, hg.edist_eq, Prod.map_apply]
#align isometry.prod_map Isometry.prod_map
theorem _root_.isometry_dcomp {ι} [Fintype ι] {α β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (β i)] (f : ∀ i, α i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, Isometry (f i)) :
Isometry (fun g : (i : ι) → α i => fun i => f i (g i)) := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_pi_def, (hf _).edist_eq]
#align isometry_dcomp isometry_dcomp
/-- The composition of isometries is an isometry. -/
theorem comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Isometry g) (hf : Isometry f) : Isometry (g ∘ f) :=
fun _ _ => (hg _ _).trans (hf _ _)
#align isometry.comp Isometry.comp
/-- An isometry from a metric space is a uniform continuous map -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous (hf : Isometry f) : UniformContinuous f :=
hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
#align isometry.uniform_continuous Isometry.uniformContinuous
/-- An isometry from a metric space is a uniform inducing map -/
protected theorem uniformInducing (hf : Isometry f) : UniformInducing f :=
hf.antilipschitz.uniformInducing hf.uniformContinuous
#align isometry.uniform_inducing Isometry.uniformInducing
theorem tendsto_nhds_iff {ι : Type*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {a : Filter ι} {b : α}
(hf : Isometry f) : Filter.Tendsto g a (𝓝 b) ↔ Filter.Tendsto (f ∘ g) a (𝓝 (f b)) :=
hf.uniformInducing.inducing.tendsto_nhds_iff
#align isometry.tendsto_nhds_iff Isometry.tendsto_nhds_iff
/-- An isometry is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous (hf : Isometry f) : Continuous f :=
hf.lipschitz.continuous
#align isometry.continuous Isometry.continuous
/-- The right inverse of an isometry is an isometry. -/
theorem right_inv {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : Isometry f) (hg : RightInverse g f) : Isometry g :=
fun x y => by rw [← h, hg _, hg _]
#align isometry.right_inv Isometry.right_inv
theorem preimage_emetric_closedBall (h : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
f ⁻¹' EMetric.closedBall (f x) r = EMetric.closedBall x r := by
ext y
simp [h.edist_eq]
#align isometry.preimage_emetric_closed_ball Isometry.preimage_emetric_closedBall
theorem preimage_emetric_ball (h : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
f ⁻¹' EMetric.ball (f x) r = EMetric.ball x r := by
ext y
simp [h.edist_eq]
#align isometry.preimage_emetric_ball Isometry.preimage_emetric_ball
/-- Isometries preserve the diameter in pseudoemetric spaces. -/
theorem ediam_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set α) : EMetric.diam (f '' s) = EMetric.diam s :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp only [EMetric.diam_le_iff, forall_mem_image, hf.edist_eq]
#align isometry.ediam_image Isometry.ediam_image
theorem ediam_range (hf : Isometry f) : EMetric.diam (range f) = EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf.ediam_image univ
#align isometry.ediam_range Isometry.ediam_range
theorem mapsTo_emetric_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (EMetric.ball x r) (EMetric.ball (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_emetric_ball x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_emetric_ball Isometry.mapsTo_emetric_ball
theorem mapsTo_emetric_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (EMetric.closedBall x r) (EMetric.closedBall (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_emetric_closedBall x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_emetric_closed_ball Isometry.mapsTo_emetric_closedBall
/-- The injection from a subtype is an isometry -/
theorem _root_.isometry_subtype_coe {s : Set α} : Isometry ((↑) : s → α) := fun _ _ => rfl
#align isometry_subtype_coe isometry_subtype_coe
theorem comp_continuousOn_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Isometry f) {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} :
ContinuousOn (f ∘ g) s ↔ ContinuousOn g s :=
hf.uniformInducing.inducing.continuousOn_iff.symm
#align isometry.comp_continuous_on_iff Isometry.comp_continuousOn_iff
theorem comp_continuous_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Isometry f) {g : γ → α} :
Continuous (f ∘ g) ↔ Continuous g :=
hf.uniformInducing.inducing.continuous_iff.symm
#align isometry.comp_continuous_iff Isometry.comp_continuous_iff
end PseudoEmetricIsometry
--section
section EmetricIsometry
variable [EMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is injective -/
protected theorem injective (h : Isometry f) : Injective f :=
h.antilipschitz.injective
#align isometry.injective Isometry.injective
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is a uniform embedding -/
protected theorem uniformEmbedding (hf : Isometry f) : UniformEmbedding f :=
hf.antilipschitz.uniformEmbedding hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
#align isometry.uniform_embedding Isometry.uniformEmbedding
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is an embedding -/
protected theorem embedding (hf : Isometry f) : Embedding f :=
hf.uniformEmbedding.embedding
#align isometry.embedding Isometry.embedding
/-- An isometry from a complete emetric space is a closed embedding -/
theorem closedEmbedding [CompleteSpace α] [EMetricSpace γ] {f : α → γ} (hf : Isometry f) :
ClosedEmbedding f :=
hf.antilipschitz.closedEmbedding hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
#align isometry.closed_embedding Isometry.closedEmbedding
end EmetricIsometry
--section
section PseudoMetricIsometry
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- An isometry preserves the diameter in pseudometric spaces. -/
theorem diam_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set α) : Metric.diam (f '' s) = Metric.diam s := by
rw [Metric.diam, Metric.diam, hf.ediam_image]
#align isometry.diam_image Isometry.diam_image
theorem diam_range (hf : Isometry f) : Metric.diam (range f) = Metric.diam (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf.diam_image univ
#align isometry.diam_range Isometry.diam_range
theorem preimage_setOf_dist (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (p : ℝ → Prop) :
f ⁻¹' { y | p (dist y (f x)) } = { y | p (dist y x) } := by
ext y
simp [hf.dist_eq]
#align isometry.preimage_set_of_dist Isometry.preimage_setOf_dist
theorem preimage_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (f x) r = Metric.closedBall x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· ≤ r)
#align isometry.preimage_closed_ball Isometry.preimage_closedBall
theorem preimage_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.ball (f x) r = Metric.ball x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· < r)
#align isometry.preimage_ball Isometry.preimage_ball
theorem preimage_sphere (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.sphere (f x) r = Metric.sphere x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· = r)
#align isometry.preimage_sphere Isometry.preimage_sphere
theorem mapsTo_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.ball x r) (Metric.ball (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_ball x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_ball Isometry.mapsTo_ball
theorem mapsTo_sphere (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.sphere x r) (Metric.sphere (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_sphere x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_sphere Isometry.mapsTo_sphere
theorem mapsTo_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.closedBall x r) (Metric.closedBall (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_closedBall x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_closed_ball Isometry.mapsTo_closedBall
end PseudoMetricIsometry
-- section
end Isometry
-- namespace
/-- A uniform embedding from a uniform space to a metric space is an isometry with respect to the
induced metric space structure on the source space. -/
theorem UniformEmbedding.to_isometry {α β} [UniformSpace α] [MetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : UniformEmbedding f) : (letI := h.comapMetricSpace f; Isometry f) :=
let _ := h.comapMetricSpace f
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
#align uniform_embedding.to_isometry UniformEmbedding.to_isometry
/-- An embedding from a topological space to a metric space is an isometry with respect to the
induced metric space structure on the source space. -/
theorem Embedding.to_isometry {α β} [TopologicalSpace α] [MetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : Embedding f) : (letI := h.comapMetricSpace f; Isometry f) :=
let _ := h.comapMetricSpace f
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
#align embedding.to_isometry Embedding.to_isometry
-- such a bijection need not exist
/-- `α` and `β` are isometric if there is an isometric bijection between them. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): was @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure IsometryEquiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
extends α ≃ β where
isometry_toFun : Isometry toFun
#align isometry_equiv IsometryEquiv
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:25 " ≃ᵢ " => IsometryEquiv
namespace IsometryEquiv
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add `IsometryEquivClass`
theorem toEquiv_injective : Injective (toEquiv : (α ≃ᵢ β) → (α ≃ β))
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align isometry_equiv.to_equiv_inj IsometryEquiv.toEquiv_injective
@[simp] theorem toEquiv_inj {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ β} : e₁.toEquiv = e₂.toEquiv ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
toEquiv_injective.eq_iff
instance : EquivLike (α ≃ᵢ β) α β where
coe e := e.toEquiv
inv e := e.toEquiv.symm
left_inv e := e.left_inv
right_inv e := e.right_inv
coe_injective' _ _ h _ := toEquiv_injective <| DFunLike.ext' h
theorem coe_eq_toEquiv (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (a : α) : h a = h.toEquiv a := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_eq_to_equiv IsometryEquiv.coe_eq_toEquiv
@[simp] theorem coe_toEquiv (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toEquiv = h := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_to_equiv IsometryEquiv.coe_toEquiv
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h) : ⇑(mk e h) = e := rfl
protected theorem isometry (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Isometry h :=
h.isometry_toFun
#align isometry_equiv.isometry IsometryEquiv.isometry
protected theorem bijective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Bijective h :=
h.toEquiv.bijective
#align isometry_equiv.bijective IsometryEquiv.bijective
protected theorem injective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Injective h :=
h.toEquiv.injective
#align isometry_equiv.injective IsometryEquiv.injective
protected theorem surjective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Surjective h :=
h.toEquiv.surjective
#align isometry_equiv.surjective IsometryEquiv.surjective
protected theorem edist_eq (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x y : α) : edist (h x) (h y) = edist x y :=
h.isometry.edist_eq x y
#align isometry_equiv.edist_eq IsometryEquiv.edist_eq
protected theorem dist_eq {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
(x y : α) : dist (h x) (h y) = dist x y :=
h.isometry.dist_eq x y
#align isometry_equiv.dist_eq IsometryEquiv.dist_eq
protected theorem nndist_eq {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
(x y : α) : nndist (h x) (h y) = nndist x y :=
h.isometry.nndist_eq x y
#align isometry_equiv.nndist_eq IsometryEquiv.nndist_eq
protected theorem continuous (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Continuous h :=
h.isometry.continuous
#align isometry_equiv.continuous IsometryEquiv.continuous
@[simp]
theorem ediam_image (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (s : Set α) : EMetric.diam (h '' s) = EMetric.diam s :=
h.isometry.ediam_image s
#align isometry_equiv.ediam_image IsometryEquiv.ediam_image
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃h₁ h₂ : α ≃ᵢ β⦄ (H : ∀ x, h₁ x = h₂ x) : h₁ = h₂ :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
#align isometry_equiv.ext IsometryEquiv.ext
/-- Alternative constructor for isometric bijections,
taking as input an isometry, and a right inverse. -/
def mk' {α : Type u} [EMetricSpace α] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) (hfg : ∀ x, f (g x) = x)
(hf : Isometry f) : α ≃ᵢ β where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv _ := hf.injective <| hfg _
right_inv := hfg
isometry_toFun := hf
#align isometry_equiv.mk' IsometryEquiv.mk'
/-- The identity isometry of a space. -/
protected def refl (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ Equiv.refl α with isometry_toFun := isometry_id }
#align isometry_equiv.refl IsometryEquiv.refl
/-- The composition of two isometric isomorphisms, as an isometric isomorphism. -/
protected def trans (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) : α ≃ᵢ γ :=
{ Equiv.trans h₁.toEquiv h₂.toEquiv with
isometry_toFun := h₂.isometry_toFun.comp h₁.isometry_toFun }
#align isometry_equiv.trans IsometryEquiv.trans
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) (x : α) : h₁.trans h₂ x = h₂ (h₁ x) :=
rfl
#align isometry_equiv.trans_apply IsometryEquiv.trans_apply
/-- The inverse of an isometric isomorphism, as an isometric isomorphism. -/
protected def symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : β ≃ᵢ α where
isometry_toFun := h.isometry.right_inv h.right_inv
toEquiv := h.toEquiv.symm
#align isometry_equiv.symm IsometryEquiv.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : α → β := h
#align isometry_equiv.simps.apply IsometryEquiv.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : β → α :=
h.symm
#align isometry_equiv.simps.symm_apply IsometryEquiv.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections IsometryEquiv (toEquiv_toFun → apply, toEquiv_invFun → symm_apply)
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : h.symm.symm = h := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.symm_symm IsometryEquiv.symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Bijective (IsometryEquiv.symm : (α ≃ᵢ β) → β ≃ᵢ α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (y : β) : h (h.symm y) = y :=
h.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply y
#align isometry_equiv.apply_symm_apply IsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) : h.symm (h x) = x :=
h.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply x
#align isometry_equiv.symm_apply_apply IsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply
theorem symm_apply_eq (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {x : α} {y : β} : h.symm y = x ↔ y = h x :=
h.toEquiv.symm_apply_eq
#align isometry_equiv.symm_apply_eq IsometryEquiv.symm_apply_eq
theorem eq_symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {x : α} {y : β} : x = h.symm y ↔ h x = y :=
h.toEquiv.eq_symm_apply
#align isometry_equiv.eq_symm_apply IsometryEquiv.eq_symm_apply
theorem symm_comp_self (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : (h.symm : β → α) ∘ h = id := funext h.left_inv
#align isometry_equiv.symm_comp_self IsometryEquiv.symm_comp_self
theorem self_comp_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : (h : α → β) ∘ h.symm = id := funext h.right_inv
#align isometry_equiv.self_comp_symm IsometryEquiv.self_comp_symm
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_univ (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : range h = univ :=
h.toEquiv.range_eq_univ
#align isometry_equiv.range_eq_univ IsometryEquiv.range_eq_univ
theorem image_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : image h.symm = preimage h :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h.symm.toEquiv.left_inv h.symm.toEquiv.right_inv
#align isometry_equiv.image_symm IsometryEquiv.image_symm
theorem preimage_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : preimage h.symm = image h :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h.toEquiv.left_inv h.toEquiv.right_inv).symm
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_symm IsometryEquiv.preimage_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_apply (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) (x : γ) :
(h₁.trans h₂).symm x = h₁.symm (h₂.symm x) :=
rfl
#align isometry_equiv.symm_trans_apply IsometryEquiv.symm_trans_apply
theorem ediam_univ (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) = EMetric.diam (univ : Set β) := by
rw [← h.range_eq_univ, h.isometry.ediam_range]
#align isometry_equiv.ediam_univ IsometryEquiv.ediam_univ
@[simp]
theorem ediam_preimage (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (s : Set β) : EMetric.diam (h ⁻¹' s) = EMetric.diam s := by
rw [← image_symm, ediam_image]
#align isometry_equiv.ediam_preimage IsometryEquiv.ediam_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_emetric_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h ⁻¹' EMetric.ball x r = EMetric.ball (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_emetric_ball (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_emetric_ball IsometryEquiv.preimage_emetric_ball
@[simp]
theorem preimage_emetric_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h ⁻¹' EMetric.closedBall x r = EMetric.closedBall (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_emetric_closedBall (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_emetric_closed_ball IsometryEquiv.preimage_emetric_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem image_emetric_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h '' EMetric.ball x r = EMetric.ball (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_emetric_ball, symm_symm]
#align isometry_equiv.image_emetric_ball IsometryEquiv.image_emetric_ball
@[simp]
theorem image_emetric_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h '' EMetric.closedBall x r = EMetric.closedBall (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_emetric_closedBall, symm_symm]
#align isometry_equiv.image_emetric_closed_ball IsometryEquiv.image_emetric_closedBall
/-- The (bundled) homeomorphism associated to an isometric isomorphism. -/
@[simps toEquiv]
protected def toHomeomorph (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : α ≃ₜ β where
continuous_toFun := h.continuous
continuous_invFun := h.symm.continuous
toEquiv := h.toEquiv
#align isometry_equiv.to_homeomorph IsometryEquiv.toHomeomorph
#align isometry_equiv.to_homeomorph_to_equiv IsometryEquiv.toHomeomorph_toEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHomeomorph (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toHomeomorph = h :=
rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_to_homeomorph IsometryEquiv.coe_toHomeomorph
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHomeomorph_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toHomeomorph.symm = h.symm :=
rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_to_homeomorph_symm IsometryEquiv.coe_toHomeomorph_symm
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuousOn_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : γ → α} {s : Set γ} :
ContinuousOn (h ∘ f) s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuousOn_iff _ _
#align isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_on_iff IsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuous_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : γ → α} :
Continuous (h ∘ f) ↔ Continuous f :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuous_iff
#align isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_iff IsometryEquiv.comp_continuous_iff
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuous_iff' {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : β → γ} :
Continuous (f ∘ h) ↔ Continuous f :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuous_iff'
#align isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_iff' IsometryEquiv.comp_continuous_iff'
/-- The group of isometries. -/
instance : Group (α ≃ᵢ α) where
one := IsometryEquiv.refl _
mul e₁ e₂ := e₂.trans e₁
inv := IsometryEquiv.symm
mul_assoc e₁ e₂ e₃ := rfl
one_mul e := ext fun _ => rfl
mul_one e := ext fun _ => rfl
mul_left_inv e := ext e.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : α ≃ᵢ α) = id := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_one IsometryEquiv.coe_one
@[simp] theorem coe_mul (e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ α) : ⇑(e₁ * e₂) = e₁ ∘ e₂ := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_mul IsometryEquiv.coe_mul
theorem mul_apply (e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : (e₁ * e₂) x = e₁ (e₂ x) := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.mul_apply IsometryEquiv.mul_apply
@[simp] theorem inv_apply_self (e : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : e⁻¹ (e x) = x := e.symm_apply_apply x
#align isometry_equiv.inv_apply_self IsometryEquiv.inv_apply_self
@[simp] theorem apply_inv_self (e : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : e (e⁻¹ x) = x := e.apply_symm_apply x
#align isometry_equiv.apply_inv_self IsometryEquiv.apply_inv_self
theorem completeSpace_iff (e : α ≃ᵢ β) : CompleteSpace α ↔ CompleteSpace β := by
simp only [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ, ← e.range_eq_univ, ← image_univ,
isComplete_image_iff e.isometry.uniformInducing]
#align isometry_equiv.complete_space_iff IsometryEquiv.completeSpace_iff
protected theorem completeSpace [CompleteSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵢ β) : CompleteSpace α :=
e.completeSpace_iff.2 ‹_›
#align isometry_equiv.complete_space IsometryEquiv.completeSpace
variable (ι α)
/-- `Equiv.funUnique` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def funUnique [Unique ι] [Fintype ι] : (ι → α) ≃ᵢ α where
toEquiv := Equiv.funUnique ι α
isometry_toFun x hx := by simp [edist_pi_def, Finset.univ_unique, Finset.sup_singleton]
#align isometry_equiv.fun_unique IsometryEquiv.funUnique
/-- `piFinTwoEquiv` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def piFinTwo (α : Fin 2 → Type*) [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)] : (∀ i, α i) ≃ᵢ α 0 × α 1 where
toEquiv := piFinTwoEquiv α
isometry_toFun x hx := by simp [edist_pi_def, Fin.univ_succ, Prod.edist_eq]
#align isometry_equiv.pi_fin_two IsometryEquiv.piFinTwo
end PseudoEMetricSpace
section PseudoMetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
@[simp]
theorem diam_image (s : Set α) : Metric.diam (h '' s) = Metric.diam s :=
h.isometry.diam_image s
#align isometry_equiv.diam_image IsometryEquiv.diam_image
@[simp]
theorem diam_preimage (s : Set β) : Metric.diam (h ⁻¹' s) = Metric.diam s := by
rw [← image_symm, diam_image]
#align isometry_equiv.diam_preimage IsometryEquiv.diam_preimage
theorem diam_univ : Metric.diam (univ : Set α) = Metric.diam (univ : Set β) :=
congr_arg ENNReal.toReal h.ediam_univ
#align isometry_equiv.diam_univ IsometryEquiv.diam_univ
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.ball x r = Metric.ball (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_ball (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_ball IsometryEquiv.preimage_ball
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sphere (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.sphere x r = Metric.sphere (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_sphere (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_sphere IsometryEquiv.preimage_sphere
@[simp]
theorem preimage_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall x r = Metric.closedBall (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_closedBall (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_closed_ball IsometryEquiv.preimage_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem image_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ) : h '' Metric.ball x r = Metric.ball (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_ball, symm_symm]
#align isometry_equiv.image_ball IsometryEquiv.image_ball
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Isometry.lean | 631 | 633 | theorem image_sphere (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
h '' Metric.sphere x r = Metric.sphere (h x) r := by |
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_sphere, symm_symm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker, Devon Tuma, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Constructions
/-!
# Uniform distributions and probability mass functions
This file defines two related notions of uniform distributions, which will be unified in the future.
# Uniform distributions
Defines the uniform distribution for any set with finite measure.
## Main definitions
* `IsUniform X s ℙ μ` : A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` under `ℙ` if the
push-forward measure agrees with the rescaled restricted measure `μ`.
# Uniform probability mass functions
This file defines a number of uniform `PMF` distributions from various inputs,
uniformly drawing from the corresponding object.
## Main definitions
`PMF.uniformOfFinset` gives each element in the set equal probability,
with `0` probability for elements not in the set.
`PMF.uniformOfFintype` gives all elements equal probability,
equal to the inverse of the size of the `Fintype`.
`PMF.ofMultiset` draws randomly from the given `Multiset`, treating duplicate values as distinct.
Each probability is given by the count of the element divided by the size of the `Multiset`
# To Do:
* Refactor the `PMF` definitions to come from a `uniformMeasure` on a `Finset`/`Fintype`/`Multiset`.
-/
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
-- TODO: We can't `open ProbabilityTheory` without opening the `ProbabilityTheory` locale :(
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure PMF
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E] {m : Measure E} {μ : Measure E}
namespace pdf
variable {Ω : Type*}
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
/-- A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` if its push-forward measure is
`(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s`. -/
def IsUniform (X : Ω → E) (s : Set E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :=
map X ℙ = ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s
#align measure_theory.pdf.is_uniform MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform
namespace IsUniform
theorem aemeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
dsimp [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at hu
by_contra h
rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable h] at hu
apply zero_ne_one' ℝ≥0∞
calc
0 = (0 : Measure E) Set.univ := rfl
_ = _ := by rw [hu, smul_apply, restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ,
Set.univ_inter, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hns hnt]
theorem absolutelyContinuous {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hu]; exact ProbabilityTheory.cond_absolutelyContinuous
theorem measure_preimage {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) {A : Set E} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
ℙ (X ⁻¹' A) = μ (s ∩ A) / μ s := by
rwa [← map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) hA, hu, ProbabilityTheory.cond_apply',
ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
#align measure_theory.pdf.is_uniform.measure_preimage MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.measure_preimage
theorem isProbabilityMeasure {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ :=
⟨by
have : X ⁻¹' Set.univ = Set.univ := Set.preimage_univ
rw [← this, hu.measure_preimage hns hnt MeasurableSet.univ, Set.inter_univ,
ENNReal.div_self hns hnt]⟩
#align measure_theory.pdf.is_uniform.is_probability_measure MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.isProbabilityMeasure
theorem toMeasurable_iff {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ ↔ IsUniform X s ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform
rw [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
protected theorem toMeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform at *
rwa [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
theorem hasPDF {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
let t := toMeasurable μ s
apply hasPDF_of_map_eq_withDensity (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) (t.indicator ((μ t)⁻¹ • 1)) <|
(measurable_one.aemeasurable.const_smul (μ t)⁻¹).indicator (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)
rw [hu, withDensity_indicator (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s), withDensity_smul _ measurable_one,
withDensity_one, restrict_toMeasurable hnt, measure_toMeasurable, ProbabilityTheory.cond]
#align measure_theory.pdf.is_uniform.has_pdf MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.hasPDF
theorem pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E}
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) (hμs : μ s = 0 ∨ μ s = ∞) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rcases hμs with H|H
· simp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond, H, ENNReal.inv_zero, restrict_eq_zero.mpr H,
smul_zero] at hu
simp [pdf, hu]
· simp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond, H, ENNReal.inv_top, zero_smul] at hu
simp [pdf, hu]
theorem pdf_eq {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hms : MeasurableSet s)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) := by
by_cases hnt : μ s = ∞
· simp [pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top hu (Or.inr hnt), hnt]
by_cases hns : μ s = 0
· filter_upwards [measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.mp hns,
pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top hu (Or.inl hns)] with x hx h'x
simp [hx, h'x, hns]
have : HasPDF X ℙ μ := hasPDF hns hnt hu
have : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ := isProbabilityMeasure hns hnt hu
apply (eq_of_map_eq_withDensity _ _).mp
· rw [hu, withDensity_indicator hms, withDensity_smul _ measurable_one, withDensity_one,
ProbabilityTheory.cond]
· exact (measurable_one.aemeasurable.const_smul (μ s)⁻¹).indicator hms
theorem pdf_toReal_ae_eq {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hms : MeasurableSet s)
(hX : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
(fun x => (pdf X ℙ μ x).toReal) =ᵐ[μ] fun x =>
(s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) x).toReal :=
Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp (pdf_eq hms hX) ENNReal.toReal
#align measure_theory.pdf.is_uniform.pdf_to_real_ae_eq MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.pdf_toReal_ae_eq
variable {X : Ω → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
theorem mul_pdf_integrable (hcs : IsCompact s) (huX : IsUniform X s ℙ) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => x * (pdf X ℙ volume x).toReal := by
by_cases hnt : volume s = 0 ∨ volume s = ∞
· have I : Integrable (fun x ↦ x * ENNReal.toReal (0)) := by simp
apply I.congr
filter_upwards [pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top huX hnt] with x hx
simp [hx]
simp only [not_or] at hnt
have : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ := isProbabilityMeasure hnt.1 hnt.2 huX
constructor
· exact aestronglyMeasurable_id.mul
(measurable_pdf X ℙ).aemeasurable.ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable
refine hasFiniteIntegral_mul (pdf_eq hcs.measurableSet huX) ?_
set ind := (volume s)⁻¹ • (1 : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞)
have : ∀ x, ↑‖x‖₊ * s.indicator ind x = s.indicator (fun x => ‖x‖₊ * ind x) x := fun x =>
(s.indicator_mul_right (fun x => ↑‖x‖₊) ind).symm
simp only [ind, this, lintegral_indicator _ hcs.measurableSet, mul_one, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
Pi.one_apply, Pi.smul_apply]
rw [lintegral_mul_const _ measurable_nnnorm.coe_nnreal_ennreal]
exact (ENNReal.mul_lt_top (set_lintegral_lt_top_of_isCompact hnt.2 hcs continuous_nnnorm).ne
(ENNReal.inv_lt_top.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hnt.1)).ne).ne
#align measure_theory.pdf.is_uniform.mul_pdf_integrable MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.mul_pdf_integrable
/-- A real uniform random variable `X` with support `s` has expectation
`(λ s)⁻¹ * ∫ x in s, x ∂λ` where `λ` is the Lebesgue measure. -/
theorem integral_eq (huX : IsUniform X s ℙ) :
∫ x, X x ∂ℙ = (volume s)⁻¹.toReal * ∫ x in s, x := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← integral_smul_measure]
dsimp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at huX
rw [← huX]
by_cases hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ
· exact (integral_map hX aestronglyMeasurable_id).symm
· rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable hX, integral_zero_measure, integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable]
rwa [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable]
#align measure_theory.pdf.is_uniform.integral_eq MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.integral_eq
end IsUniform
variable {X : Ω → E}
lemma IsUniform.cond {s : Set E} :
IsUniform (id : E → E) s (ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s) μ := by
unfold IsUniform
rw [Measure.map_id]
/-- The density of the uniform measure on a set with respect to itself. This allows us to abstract
away the choice of random variable and probability space. -/
def uniformPDF (s : Set E) (x : E) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) x
/-- Check that indeed any uniform random variable has the uniformPDF. -/
lemma uniformPDF_eq_pdf {s : Set E} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hu : pdf.IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
(fun x ↦ uniformPDF s x μ) =ᵐ[μ] pdf X ℙ μ := by
unfold uniformPDF
exact Filter.EventuallyEq.trans (pdf.IsUniform.pdf_eq hs hu).symm (ae_eq_refl _)
/-- Alternative way of writing the uniformPDF. -/
lemma uniformPDF_ite {s : Set E} {x : E} :
uniformPDF s x μ = if x ∈ s then (μ s)⁻¹ else 0 := by
unfold uniformPDF
unfold Set.indicator
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
end pdf
end MeasureTheory
noncomputable section
namespace PMF
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open scoped Classical NNReal ENNReal
section UniformOfFinset
/-- Uniform distribution taking the same non-zero probability on the nonempty finset `s` -/
def uniformOfFinset (s : Finset α) (hs : s.Nonempty) : PMF α := by
refine ofFinset (fun a => if a ∈ s then s.card⁻¹ else 0) s ?_ ?_
· simp only [Finset.sum_ite_mem, Finset.inter_self, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
have : (s.card : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, Finset.card_eq_zero] using
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.1 hs
exact ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel this <| ENNReal.natCast_ne_top s.card
· exact fun x hx => by simp only [hx, if_false]
#align pmf.uniform_of_finset PMF.uniformOfFinset
variable {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem uniformOfFinset_apply (a : α) :
uniformOfFinset s hs a = if a ∈ s then (s.card : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ else 0 :=
rfl
#align pmf.uniform_of_finset_apply PMF.uniformOfFinset_apply
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Uniform.lean | 243 | 244 | theorem uniformOfFinset_apply_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : uniformOfFinset s hs a = (s.card : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by |
simp [ha]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import data.nat.part_enat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
#align part_enat PartENat
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
#align part_enat.some PartENat.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_some PartENat.dom_some
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm x y := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add x := Part.ext' (true_and_iff _) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero x := Part.ext' (and_true_iff _) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc x y z := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (true_and_iff _).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.some_eq_coe PartENat.some_eq_natCast
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
#align part_enat.coe_inj PartENat.natCast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_coe PartENat.dom_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Sup PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
#align part_enat.le_def PartENat.le_def
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
#align part_enat.cases_on' PartENat.casesOn'
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
#align part_enat.cases_on PartENat.casesOn
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (false_and_iff _) fun h => h.left.elim
#align part_enat.top_add PartENat.top_add
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
#align part_enat.add_top PartENat.add_top
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
#align part_enat.coe_get PartENat.natCast_get
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_coe' PartENat.get_natCast'
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
#align part_enat.get_coe PartENat.get_natCast
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_add_get PartENat.coe_add_get
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_add PartENat.get_add
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_zero PartENat.get_zero
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_one PartENat.get_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom) :
Part.get (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) h = (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x)) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_some PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_of_dom PartENat.dom_of_le_of_dom
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_some PartENat.dom_of_le_some
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_coe PartENat.dom_of_le_natCast
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by rw [le_def])
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
#align part_enat.decidable_le PartENat.decidableLe
-- Porting note: Removed. Use `Nat.castAddMonoidHom` instead.
#noalign part_enat.coe_hom
#noalign part_enat.coe_coe_hom
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
#align part_enat.lt_def PartENat.lt_def
noncomputable instance orderedAddCommMonoid : OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder, PartENat.addCommMonoid with
add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
#align part_enat.semilattice_sup PartENat.semilatticeSup
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
#align part_enat.order_bot PartENat.orderBot
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
#align part_enat.order_top PartENat.orderTop
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
#align part_enat.coe_le_coe PartENat.coe_le_coe
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
#align part_enat.coe_lt_coe PartENat.coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 318 | 321 | theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by |
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.setoid.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
/-!
# Equivalence relations
This file defines the complete lattice of equivalence relations on a type, results about the
inductively defined equivalence closure of a binary relation, and the analogues of some isomorphism
theorems for quotients of arbitrary types.
## Implementation notes
The function `Rel` and lemmas ending in ' make it easier to talk about different
equivalence relations on the same type.
The complete lattice instance for equivalence relations could have been defined by lifting
the Galois insertion of equivalence relations on α into binary relations on α, and then using
`CompleteLattice.copy` to define a complete lattice instance with more appropriate
definitional equalities (a similar example is `Filter.CompleteLattice` in
`Order/Filter/Basic.lean`). This does not save space, however, and is less clear.
Partitions are not defined as a separate structure here; users are encouraged to
reason about them using the existing `Setoid` and its infrastructure.
## Tags
setoid, equivalence, iseqv, relation, equivalence relation
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- A version of `Setoid.r` that takes the equivalence relation as an explicit argument. -/
def Setoid.Rel (r : Setoid α) : α → α → Prop :=
@Setoid.r _ r
#align setoid.rel Setoid.Rel
instance Setoid.decidableRel (r : Setoid α) [h : DecidableRel r.r] : DecidableRel r.Rel :=
h
#align setoid.decidable_rel Setoid.decidableRel
/-- A version of `Quotient.eq'` compatible with `Setoid.Rel`, to make rewriting possible. -/
theorem Quotient.eq_rel {r : Setoid α} {x y} :
(Quotient.mk' x : Quotient r) = Quotient.mk' y ↔ r.Rel x y :=
Quotient.eq
#align quotient.eq_rel Quotient.eq_rel
namespace Setoid
@[ext]
theorem ext' {r s : Setoid α} (H : ∀ a b, r.Rel a b ↔ s.Rel a b) : r = s :=
ext H
#align setoid.ext' Setoid.ext'
theorem ext_iff {r s : Setoid α} : r = s ↔ ∀ a b, r.Rel a b ↔ s.Rel a b :=
⟨fun h _ _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, ext'⟩
#align setoid.ext_iff Setoid.ext_iff
/-- Two equivalence relations are equal iff their underlying binary operations are equal. -/
theorem eq_iff_rel_eq {r₁ r₂ : Setoid α} : r₁ = r₂ ↔ r₁.Rel = r₂.Rel :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, fun h => Setoid.ext' fun _ _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl⟩
#align setoid.eq_iff_rel_eq Setoid.eq_iff_rel_eq
/-- Defining `≤` for equivalence relations. -/
instance : LE (Setoid α) :=
⟨fun r s => ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r.Rel x y → s.Rel x y⟩
theorem le_def {r s : Setoid α} : r ≤ s ↔ ∀ {x y}, r.Rel x y → s.Rel x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align setoid.le_def Setoid.le_def
@[refl]
theorem refl' (r : Setoid α) (x) : r.Rel x x := r.iseqv.refl x
#align setoid.refl' Setoid.refl'
@[symm]
theorem symm' (r : Setoid α) : ∀ {x y}, r.Rel x y → r.Rel y x := r.iseqv.symm
#align setoid.symm' Setoid.symm'
@[trans]
theorem trans' (r : Setoid α) : ∀ {x y z}, r.Rel x y → r.Rel y z → r.Rel x z := r.iseqv.trans
#align setoid.trans' Setoid.trans'
theorem comm' (s : Setoid α) {x y} : s.Rel x y ↔ s.Rel y x :=
⟨s.symm', s.symm'⟩
#align setoid.comm' Setoid.comm'
/-- The kernel of a function is an equivalence relation. -/
def ker (f : α → β) : Setoid α :=
⟨(· = ·) on f, eq_equivalence.comap f⟩
#align setoid.ker Setoid.ker
/-- The kernel of the quotient map induced by an equivalence relation r equals r. -/
@[simp]
theorem ker_mk_eq (r : Setoid α) : ker (@Quotient.mk'' _ r) = r :=
ext' fun _ _ => Quotient.eq
#align setoid.ker_mk_eq Setoid.ker_mk_eq
theorem ker_apply_mk_out {f : α → β} (a : α) : f (haveI := Setoid.ker f; ⟦a⟧.out) = f a :=
@Quotient.mk_out _ (Setoid.ker f) a
#align setoid.ker_apply_mk_out Setoid.ker_apply_mk_out
theorem ker_apply_mk_out' {f : α → β} (a : α) :
f (Quotient.mk _ a : Quotient <| Setoid.ker f).out' = f a :=
@Quotient.mk_out' _ (Setoid.ker f) a
#align setoid.ker_apply_mk_out' Setoid.ker_apply_mk_out'
theorem ker_def {f : α → β} {x y : α} : (ker f).Rel x y ↔ f x = f y :=
Iff.rfl
#align setoid.ker_def Setoid.ker_def
/-- Given types `α`, `β`, the product of two equivalence relations `r` on `α` and `s` on `β`:
`(x₁, x₂), (y₁, y₂) ∈ α × β` are related by `r.prod s` iff `x₁` is related to `y₁`
by `r` and `x₂` is related to `y₂` by `s`. -/
protected def prod (r : Setoid α) (s : Setoid β) :
Setoid (α × β) where
r x y := r.Rel x.1 y.1 ∧ s.Rel x.2 y.2
iseqv :=
⟨fun x => ⟨r.refl' x.1, s.refl' x.2⟩, fun h => ⟨r.symm' h.1, s.symm' h.2⟩,
fun h₁ h₂ => ⟨r.trans' h₁.1 h₂.1, s.trans' h₁.2 h₂.2⟩⟩
#align setoid.prod Setoid.prod
/-- The infimum of two equivalence relations. -/
instance : Inf (Setoid α) :=
⟨fun r s =>
⟨fun x y => r.Rel x y ∧ s.Rel x y,
⟨fun x => ⟨r.refl' x, s.refl' x⟩, fun h => ⟨r.symm' h.1, s.symm' h.2⟩, fun h1 h2 =>
⟨r.trans' h1.1 h2.1, s.trans' h1.2 h2.2⟩⟩⟩⟩
/-- The infimum of 2 equivalence relations r and s is the same relation as the infimum
of the underlying binary operations. -/
theorem inf_def {r s : Setoid α} : (r ⊓ s).Rel = r.Rel ⊓ s.Rel :=
rfl
#align setoid.inf_def Setoid.inf_def
theorem inf_iff_and {r s : Setoid α} {x y} : (r ⊓ s).Rel x y ↔ r.Rel x y ∧ s.Rel x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align setoid.inf_iff_and Setoid.inf_iff_and
/-- The infimum of a set of equivalence relations. -/
instance : InfSet (Setoid α) :=
⟨fun S =>
{ r := fun x y => ∀ r ∈ S, r.Rel x y
iseqv := ⟨fun x r _ => r.refl' x, fun h r hr => r.symm' <| h r hr, fun h1 h2 r hr =>
r.trans' (h1 r hr) <| h2 r hr⟩ }⟩
/-- The underlying binary operation of the infimum of a set of equivalence relations
is the infimum of the set's image under the map to the underlying binary operation. -/
theorem sInf_def {s : Set (Setoid α)} : (sInf s).Rel = sInf (Rel '' s) := by
ext
simp only [sInf_image, iInf_apply, iInf_Prop_eq]
rfl
#align setoid.Inf_def Setoid.sInf_def
instance : PartialOrder (Setoid α) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt r s := r ≤ s ∧ ¬s ≤ r
le_refl _ _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ hr hs _ _ h := hs <| hr h
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm _ _ h1 h2 := Setoid.ext' fun _ _ => ⟨fun h => h1 h, fun h => h2 h⟩
/-- The complete lattice of equivalence relations on a type, with bottom element `=`
and top element the trivial equivalence relation. -/
instance completeLattice : CompleteLattice (Setoid α) :=
{ (completeLatticeOfInf (Setoid α)) fun _ =>
⟨fun _ hr _ _ h => h _ hr, fun _ hr _ _ h _ hr' => hr hr' h⟩ with
inf := Inf.inf
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ _ h => h.1
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ _ h => h.2
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h1 h2 _ _ h => ⟨h1 h, h2 h⟩
top := ⟨fun _ _ => True, ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun h => h, fun h1 _ => h1⟩⟩
le_top := fun _ _ _ _ => trivial
bot := ⟨(· = ·), ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun h => h.symm, fun h1 h2 => h1.trans h2⟩⟩
bot_le := fun r x _ h => h ▸ r.2.1 x }
#align setoid.complete_lattice Setoid.completeLattice
@[simp]
theorem top_def : (⊤ : Setoid α).Rel = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align setoid.top_def Setoid.top_def
@[simp]
theorem bot_def : (⊥ : Setoid α).Rel = (· = ·) :=
rfl
#align setoid.bot_def Setoid.bot_def
theorem eq_top_iff {s : Setoid α} : s = (⊤ : Setoid α) ↔ ∀ x y : α, s.Rel x y := by
rw [_root_.eq_top_iff, Setoid.le_def, Setoid.top_def]
simp only [Pi.top_apply, Prop.top_eq_true, forall_true_left]
#align setoid.eq_top_iff Setoid.eq_top_iff
lemma sInf_equiv {S : Set (Setoid α)} {x y : α} :
letI := sInf S
x ≈ y ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s.Rel x y := Iff.rfl
lemma quotient_mk_sInf_eq {S : Set (Setoid α)} {x y : α} :
Quotient.mk (sInf S) x = Quotient.mk (sInf S) y ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s.Rel x y := by
simp
rfl
/-- The map induced between quotients by a setoid inequality. -/
def map_of_le {s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Quotient s → Quotient t :=
Quotient.map' id h
/-- The map from the quotient of the infimum of a set of setoids into the quotient
by an element of this set. -/
def map_sInf {S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) :
Quotient (sInf S) → Quotient s :=
Setoid.map_of_le fun _ _ a ↦ a s h
/-- The inductively defined equivalence closure of a binary relation r is the infimum
of the set of all equivalence relations containing r. -/
theorem eqvGen_eq (r : α → α → Prop) :
EqvGen.Setoid r = sInf { s : Setoid α | ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → s.Rel x y } :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ _ H =>
EqvGen.rec (fun _ _ h _ hs => hs h) (refl' _) (fun _ _ _ => symm' _)
(fun _ _ _ _ _ => trans' _) H)
(sInf_le fun _ _ h => EqvGen.rel _ _ h)
#align setoid.eqv_gen_eq Setoid.eqvGen_eq
/-- The supremum of two equivalence relations r and s is the equivalence closure of the binary
relation `x is related to y by r or s`. -/
theorem sup_eq_eqvGen (r s : Setoid α) :
r ⊔ s = EqvGen.Setoid fun x y => r.Rel x y ∨ s.Rel x y := by
rw [eqvGen_eq]
apply congr_arg sInf
simp only [le_def, or_imp, ← forall_and]
#align setoid.sup_eq_eqv_gen Setoid.sup_eq_eqvGen
/-- The supremum of 2 equivalence relations r and s is the equivalence closure of the
supremum of the underlying binary operations. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Setoid/Basic.lean | 240 | 241 | theorem sup_def {r s : Setoid α} : r ⊔ s = EqvGen.Setoid (r.Rel ⊔ s.Rel) := by |
rw [sup_eq_eqvGen]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudriashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudriashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Closure
#align_import analysis.convex.hull from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
/-!
# Convex hull
This file defines the convex hull of a set `s` in a module. `convexHull 𝕜 s` is the smallest convex
set containing `s`. In order theory speak, this is a closure operator.
## Implementation notes
`convexHull` is defined as a closure operator. This gives access to the `ClosureOperator` API
while the impact on writing code is minimal as `convexHull 𝕜 s` is automatically elaborated as
`(convexHull 𝕜) s`.
-/
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section convexHull
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable (𝕜)
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
/-- The convex hull of a set `s` is the minimal convex set that includes `s`. -/
@[simps! isClosed]
def convexHull : ClosureOperator (Set E) := .ofCompletePred (Convex 𝕜) fun _ ↦ convex_sInter
#align convex_hull convexHull
variable (s : Set E)
theorem subset_convexHull : s ⊆ convexHull 𝕜 s :=
(convexHull 𝕜).le_closure s
#align subset_convex_hull subset_convexHull
theorem convex_convexHull : Convex 𝕜 (convexHull 𝕜 s) := (convexHull 𝕜).isClosed_closure s
#align convex_convex_hull convex_convexHull
theorem convexHull_eq_iInter : convexHull 𝕜 s = ⋂ (t : Set E) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : Convex 𝕜 t), t := by
simp [convexHull, iInter_subtype, iInter_and]
#align convex_hull_eq_Inter convexHull_eq_iInter
variable {𝕜 s} {t : Set E} {x y : E}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Hull.lean | 62 | 63 | theorem mem_convexHull_iff : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ t, s ⊆ t → Convex 𝕜 t → x ∈ t := by |
simp_rw [convexHull_eq_iInter, mem_iInter]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# The `abel` tactic
Evaluate expressions in the language of additive, commutative monoids and groups.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
open Lean Elab Meta Tactic Qq
initialize registerTraceClass `abel
initialize registerTraceClass `abel.detail
/-- The `Context` for a call to `abel`.
Stores a few options for this call, and caches some common subexpressions
such as typeclass instances and `0 : α`.
-/
structure Context where
/-- The type of the ambient additive commutative group or monoid. -/
α : Expr
/-- The universe level for `α`. -/
univ : Level
/-- The expression representing `0 : α`. -/
α0 : Expr
/-- Specify whether we are in an additive commutative group or an additive commutative monoid. -/
isGroup : Bool
/-- The `AddCommGroup α` or `AddCommMonoid α` expression. -/
inst : Expr
/-- Populate a `context` object for evaluating `e`. -/
def mkContext (e : Expr) : MetaM Context := do
let α ← inferType e
let c ← synthInstance (← mkAppM ``AddCommMonoid #[α])
let cg ← synthInstance? (← mkAppM ``AddCommGroup #[α])
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
_ ← isDefEq (.sort (.succ u)) (← inferType α)
let α0 ← Expr.ofNat α 0
match cg with
| some cg => return ⟨α, u, α0, true, cg⟩
| _ => return ⟨α, u, α0, false, c⟩
/-- The monad for `Abel` contains, in addition to the `AtomM` state,
some information about the current type we are working over, so that we can consistently
use group lemmas or monoid lemmas as appropriate. -/
abbrev M := ReaderT Context AtomM
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [inst : AddWhatever α], _` to the
implicit parameters in the context, and the given list of arguments. -/
def Context.app (c : Context) (n : Name) (inst : Expr) : Array Expr → Expr :=
mkAppN (((@Expr.const n [c.univ]).app c.α).app inst)
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [inst α], _` to the implicit parameters in the
context, and the given list of arguments.
Compared to `context.app`, this takes the name of the typeclass, rather than an
inferred typeclass instance.
-/
def Context.mkApp (c : Context) (n inst : Name) (l : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
return c.app n (← synthInstance ((Expr.const inst [c.univ]).app c.α)) l
/-- Add the letter "g" to the end of the name, e.g. turning `term` into `termg`.
This is used to choose between declarations taking `AddCommMonoid` and those
taking `AddCommGroup` instances.
-/
def addG : Name → Name
| .str p s => .str p (s ++ "g")
| n => n
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [AddComm{Monoid,Group} α]` to the given list of arguments.
Will use the `AddComm{Monoid,Group}` instance that has been cached in the context.
-/
def iapp (n : Name) (xs : Array Expr) : M Expr := do
let c ← read
return c.app (if c.isGroup then addG n else n) c.inst xs
/-- A type synonym used by `abel` to represent `n • x + a` in an additive commutative monoid. -/
def term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n : ℕ) (x a : α) : α := n • x + a
/-- A type synonym used by `abel` to represent `n • x + a` in an additive commutative group. -/
def termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n : ℤ) (x a : α) : α := n • x + a
/-- Evaluate a term with coefficient `n`, atom `x` and successor terms `a`. -/
def mkTerm (n x a : Expr) : M Expr := iapp ``term #[n, x, a]
/-- Interpret an integer as a coefficient to a term. -/
def intToExpr (n : ℤ) : M Expr := do
Expr.ofInt (mkConst (if (← read).isGroup then ``Int else ``Nat) []) n
/-- A normal form for `abel`.
Expressions are represented as a list of terms of the form `e = n • x`,
where `n : ℤ` and `x` is an arbitrary element of the additive commutative monoid or group.
We explicitly track the `Expr` forms of `e` and `n`, even though they could be reconstructed,
for efficiency. -/
inductive NormalExpr : Type
| zero (e : Expr) : NormalExpr
| nterm (e : Expr) (n : Expr × ℤ) (x : ℕ × Expr) (a : NormalExpr) : NormalExpr
deriving Inhabited
/-- Extract the expression from a normal form. -/
def NormalExpr.e : NormalExpr → Expr
| .zero e => e
| .nterm e .. => e
instance : Coe NormalExpr Expr where coe := NormalExpr.e
/-- Construct the normal form representing a single term. -/
def NormalExpr.term' (n : Expr × ℤ) (x : ℕ × Expr) (a : NormalExpr) : M NormalExpr :=
return .nterm (← mkTerm n.1 x.2 a) n x a
/-- Construct the normal form representing zero. -/
def NormalExpr.zero' : M NormalExpr := return NormalExpr.zero (← read).α0
open NormalExpr
theorem const_add_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (k n x a a') (h : k + a = a') :
k + @term α _ n x a = term n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, term, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem const_add_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (k n x a a') (h : k + a = a') :
k + @termg α _ n x a = termg n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, termg, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_const {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n x a k a') (h : a + k = a') :
@term α _ n x a + k = term n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, term, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_constg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n x a k a') (h : a + k = a') :
@termg α _ n x a + k = termg n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, termg, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n₁ x a₁ n₂ a₂ n' a') (h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n')
(h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') : @term α _ n₁ x a₁ + @term α _ n₂ x a₂ = term n' x a' := by
simp [h₁.symm, h₂.symm, term, add_nsmul, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem term_add_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n₁ x a₁ n₂ a₂ n' a')
(h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n') (h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') :
@termg α _ n₁ x a₁ + @termg α _ n₂ x a₂ = termg n' x a' := by
simp only [termg, h₁.symm, add_zsmul, h₂.symm]
exact add_add_add_comm (n₁ • x) a₁ (n₂ • x) a₂
theorem zero_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (x a) : @term α _ 0 x a = a := by
simp [term, zero_nsmul, one_nsmul]
theorem zero_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (x a) : @termg α _ 0 x a = a := by
simp [termg, zero_zsmul]
/--
Interpret the sum of two expressions in `abel`'s normal form.
-/
partial def evalAdd : NormalExpr → NormalExpr → M (NormalExpr × Expr)
| zero _, e₂ => do
let p ← mkAppM ``zero_add #[e₂]
return (e₂, p)
| e₁, zero _ => do
let p ← mkAppM ``add_zero #[e₁]
return (e₁, p)
| he₁@(nterm e₁ n₁ x₁ a₁), he₂@(nterm e₂ n₂ x₂ a₂) => do
if x₁.1 = x₂.1 then
let n' ← Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.eval (← mkAppM ``HAdd.hAdd #[n₁.1, n₂.1])
let (a', h₂) ← evalAdd a₁ a₂
let k := n₁.2 + n₂.2
let p₁ ← iapp ``term_add_term
#[n₁.1, x₁.2, a₁, n₂.1, a₂, n'.expr, a', ← n'.getProof, h₂]
if k = 0 then do
let p ← mkEqTrans p₁ (← iapp ``zero_term #[x₁.2, a'])
return (a', p)
else return (← term' (n'.expr, k) x₁ a', p₁)
else if x₁.1 < x₂.1 then do
let (a', h) ← evalAdd a₁ he₂
return (← term' n₁ x₁ a', ← iapp ``term_add_const #[n₁.1, x₁.2, a₁, e₂, a', h])
else do
let (a', h) ← evalAdd he₁ a₂
return (← term' n₂ x₂ a', ← iapp ``const_add_term #[e₁, n₂.1, x₂.2, a₂, a', h])
| Mathlib/Tactic/Abel.lean | 188 | 190 | theorem term_neg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n x a n' a')
(h₁ : -n = n') (h₂ : -a = a') : -@termg α _ n x a = termg n' x a' := by |
simpa [h₂.symm, h₁.symm, termg] using add_comm _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.WithDensity
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
#align_import measure_theory.function.strongly_measurable.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3b52265189f3fb43aa631edffce5d060fafaf82f"
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure. We also provide almost everywhere versions of
these notions.
Almost everywhere strongly measurable functions form the largest class of functions that can be
integrated using the Bochner integral.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
* `AEStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `StronglyMeasurable` function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `FinStronglyMeasurable`
function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.sigmaFiniteSet`: a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
## Main statements
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, and for almost everywhere strongly
measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## References
* Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.FinStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure `μ` if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions. -/
def AEStronglyMeasurable
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, StronglyMeasurable g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEFinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions with support with finite measure. -/
def AEFinStronglyMeasurable
[Zero β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, FinStronglyMeasurable g μ ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEFinStronglyMeasurable
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
@[aesop 30% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
⟨f, hf, EventuallyEq.refl _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· have h_univ : f ⁻¹' {x} = Set.univ := by
ext1 y
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [h_univ]
exact MeasurableSet.univ
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable
@[nontriviality]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")]
alias stronglyMeasurable_of_fintype := StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_finite (since := "2024-02-06")]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_finite f
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {b : β} :
StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [One β] :
StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) :=
stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_one MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_one
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_zero MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_zero
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' {α β} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const' MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const'
-- Porting note: changed binding type of `MeasurableSpace α`.
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_const' fun x y => by rw [Subsingleton.elim x y]
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable'
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.approx MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.approx
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.approx_bounded MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx_bounded_of_norm_le MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx_bounded_ae MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approxBounded_ae
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.norm_approx_bounded_le MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.norm_approxBounded_le
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· simp only [@Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' _ _ ⊥ _ _ f,
eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
#align strongly_measurable_bot_iff stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurable_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq]
refine fun n => (measure_biUnion_finset_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
refine ENNReal.sum_lt_top_iff.mpr fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.fin_strongly_measurable_of_set_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.finStronglyMeasurable
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurable
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align continuous.comp_strongly_measurable Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_mul_support MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_mulSupport
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_support MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_support
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mono MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mono
protected theorem prod_mk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prod_mk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.prod_mk MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.prod_mk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.comp_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.of_uncurry_left MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_uncurry_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_right
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.of_uncurry_right MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_uncurry_right
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.add MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.add
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mul_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mul_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.add_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.add_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_mul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_mul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_add MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_add
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.inv MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.inv
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.neg MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.neg
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.div MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.div
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.sub MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [TopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [TopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.smul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.smul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.vadd MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.vadd
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_smul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_smul
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_smul' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk stronglyMeasurable_const)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.smul_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.smul_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.vadd_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.vadd_const
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCommGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a strongly measurable function and a measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable_add
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (f + g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ φ n x + g x) atTop (𝓝 (f + g)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ (hφ x).add tendsto_const_nhds)
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.simpleFunc_add _
end Arithmetic
section MulAction
variable {M G G₀ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M β] [ContinuousConstSMul M β]
variable [Group G] [MulAction G β] [ContinuousConstSMul G β]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [MulAction G₀ β] [ContinuousConstSMul G₀ β]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : G) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
#align strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
nonrec theorem _root_.IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : M}
(hc : IsUnit c) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff u
#align is_unit.strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
#align strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff₀ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀
end MulAction
section Order
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
open Filter
open Filter
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [Sup β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.sup MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.sup
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [Inf β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.inf MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.inf
end Order
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact stronglyMeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
#align list.strongly_measurable_prod' List.stronglyMeasurable_prod'
#align list.strongly_measurable_sum' List.stronglyMeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hl
#align list.strongly_measurable_prod List.stronglyMeasurable_prod
#align list.strongly_measurable_sum List.stronglyMeasurable_sum
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_prod' Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod'
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_sum' Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hs
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_prod Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_sum Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_sum
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Finset.prod_induction _ _ (fun _a _b ha hb => ha.mul hb) (@stronglyMeasurable_one α M _ _ _) hf
#align finset.strongly_measurable_prod' Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod'
#align finset.strongly_measurable_sum' Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a := by
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hf
#align finset.strongly_measurable_prod Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod
#align finset.strongly_measurable_sum Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum
end CommMonoid
/-- The range of a strongly measurable function is separable. -/
protected theorem isSeparable_range {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (range f) := by
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ n, range (hf.approx n))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun n => (hf.approx n).finite_range.isSeparable
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto (hf.tendsto_approx x)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.is_separable_range MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.isSeparable_range
theorem separableSpace_range_union_singleton {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {b : β} :
SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {b} : Set β) :=
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
(hf.isSeparable_range.union (finite_singleton _).isSeparable).separableSpace
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.separable_space_range_union_singleton MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
section SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- In a space with second countable topology, measurable implies strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopology β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (hf : Measurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
nontriviality β; inhabit β
exact ⟨SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf Set.univ default (Set.mem_univ _), fun x ↦
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf (Set.mem_univ _) (by rw [closure_univ]; simp)⟩
#align measurable.strongly_measurable Measurable.stronglyMeasurable
/-- In a space with second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are equivalent. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β] : StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h⟩
#align strongly_measurable_iff_measurable stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_id [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] : StronglyMeasurable (id : α → α) :=
measurable_id.stronglyMeasurable
#align strongly_measurable_id stronglyMeasurable_id
end SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is strongly measurable if and only if it is measurable and has separable
range. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] :
StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f ∧ IsSeparable (range f) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.measurable, H.isSeparable_range⟩, fun ⟨Hm, Hsep⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
have := Hsep.secondCountableTopology
have Hm' : StronglyMeasurable (rangeFactorization f) := Hm.subtype_mk.stronglyMeasurable
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp_stronglyMeasurable Hm'
#align strongly_measurable_iff_measurable_separable stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable
/-- A continuous function is strongly measurable when either the source space or the target space
is second-countable. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize β
cases h.out
· rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.measurable, ?_⟩
exact isSeparable_range hf
· exact hf.measurable.stronglyMeasurable
#align continuous.strongly_measurable Continuous.stronglyMeasurable
/-- A continuous function whose support is contained in a compact set is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) {k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(h'f : mulSupport f ⊆ k) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace β := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨hf.measurable, (isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact hf hk h'f).isSeparable⟩
/-- A continuous function with compact support is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_hasCompactMulSupport
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactMulSupport f) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact h'f (subset_mulTSupport f)
/-- A continuous function with compact support on a product space is strongly measurable for the
product sigma-algebra. The subtlety is that we do not assume that the spaces are separable, so the
product of the Borel sigma algebras might not contain all open sets, but still it contains enough
of them to approximate compactly supported continuous functions. -/
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.stronglyMeasurable_of_prod {X Y : Type*} [Zero α]
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
{f : X × Y → α} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize α
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨h'f.measurable_of_prod hf, ?_⟩
letI : PseudoMetricSpace α := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
exact IsCompact.isSeparable (s := range f) (h'f.isCompact_range hf)
/-- If `g` is a topological embedding, then `f` is strongly measurable iff `g ∘ f` is. -/
theorem _root_.Embedding.comp_stronglyMeasurable_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : Embedding g) : (StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x)) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric γ
borelize β γ
refine
⟨fun H => stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun H =>
hg.continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable H⟩
· let G : β → range g := rangeFactorization g
have hG : ClosedEmbedding G :=
{ hg.codRestrict _ _ with
isClosed_range := by
rw [surjective_onto_range.range_eq]
exact isClosed_univ }
have : Measurable (G ∘ f) := Measurable.subtype_mk H.measurable
exact hG.measurableEmbedding.measurable_comp_iff.1 this
· have : IsSeparable (g ⁻¹' range (g ∘ f)) := hg.isSeparable_preimage H.isSeparable_range
rwa [range_comp, hg.inj.preimage_image] at this
#align embedding.comp_strongly_measurable_iff Embedding.comp_stronglyMeasurable_iff
/-- A sequential limit of strongly measurable functions is strongly measurable. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (u : Filter ι) [NeBot u] [IsCountablyGenerated u]
{f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) (lim : Tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) :
StronglyMeasurable g := by
borelize β
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' u (fun i => (hf i).measurable) lim
· rcases u.exists_seq_tendsto with ⟨v, hv⟩
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ i, range (f (v i)))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun i => (hf (v i)).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at lim
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto ((lim x).comp hv)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
#align strongly_measurable_of_tendsto stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto
protected theorem piecewise {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
{_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (Set.piecewise s f g) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hf.tendsto_approx x
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hg.tendsto_approx x
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.piecewise MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.piecewise
/-- this is slightly different from `StronglyMeasurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`StronglyMeasurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact StronglyMeasurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) stronglyMeasurable_const
stronglyMeasurable_const`, but replacing `StronglyMeasurable.ite` by
`StronglyMeasurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
protected theorem ite {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {p : α → Prop}
{_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a }) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
StronglyMeasurable.piecewise hp hf hg
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ite MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.ite
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {g' : γ → β}
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg' : StronglyMeasurable g') :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.extend g f g') := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.extend (hf.approx n) g hg (hg'.approx n), ?_⟩
intro x
by_cases hx : ∃ y, g y = x
· rcases hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simpa only [SimpleFunc.extend_apply, hg.injective, Injective.extend_apply] using
hf.tendsto_approx y
· simpa only [hx, SimpleFunc.extend_apply', not_false_iff, extend_apply'] using
hg'.tendsto_approx x
#align measurable_embedding.strongly_measurable_extend MeasurableEmbedding.stronglyMeasurable_extend
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.exists_stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hne : γ → Nonempty β) :
∃ f' : γ → β, StronglyMeasurable f' ∧ f' ∘ g = f :=
⟨Function.extend g f fun x => Classical.choice (hne x),
hg.stronglyMeasurable_extend hf (stronglyMeasurable_const' fun _ _ => rfl),
funext fun _ => hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _⟩
#align measurable_embedding.exists_strongly_measurable_extend MeasurableEmbedding.exists_stronglyMeasurable_extend
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (s t : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t) (hc : StronglyMeasurable fun a : s => f a)
(hd : StronglyMeasurable fun a : t => f a) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality β; inhabit β
suffices Function.extend Subtype.val (fun x : s ↦ f x)
(Function.extend (↑) (fun x : t ↦ f x) fun _ ↦ default) = f from
this ▸ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).stronglyMeasurable_extend hc <|
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe ht).stronglyMeasurable_extend hd stronglyMeasurable_const
ext x
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· lift x to s using hxs
simp [Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
· lift x to t using (h trivial).resolve_left hxs
rw [extend_apply', Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
exact fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ hxs <| hy ▸ y.2
#align strongly_measurable_of_strongly_measurable_union_cover stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h₁ : StronglyMeasurable (s.restrict f)) (h₂ : StronglyMeasurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover s sᶜ hs hs.compl (union_compl_self s).ge h₁
h₂
#align strongly_measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl stronglyMeasurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl
@[measurability]
protected theorem indicator {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.indicator MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.indicator
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem dist {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f g : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => dist (f x) (g x) :=
continuous_dist.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.dist MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.dist
@[measurability]
protected theorem norm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖ :=
continuous_norm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.norm MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.norm
@[measurability]
protected theorem nnnorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖₊ :=
continuous_nnnorm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.nnnorm MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.nnnorm
@[measurability]
protected theorem ennnorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
{f : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
(ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf.nnnorm).measurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ennnorm MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.ennnorm
@[measurability]
protected theorem real_toNNReal {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x).toNNReal :=
continuous_real_toNNReal.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.real_to_nnreal MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.real_toNNReal
theorem measurableSet_eq_fun {m : MeasurableSpace α} {E} [TopologicalSpace E] [MetrizableSpace E]
{f g : α → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
MeasurableSet { x | f x = g x } := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prod_mk hg).measurable isClosed_diagonal.measurableSet
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_eq_fun MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_eq_fun
theorem measurableSet_lt {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [LinearOrder β]
[OrderClosedTopology β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {f g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : MeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } := by
borelize (β × β)
exact (hf.prod_mk hg).measurable isOpen_lt_prod.measurableSet
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_lt MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_lt
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 922 | 926 | theorem measurableSet_le {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Preorder β]
[OrderClosedTopology β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {f g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : MeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } := by |
borelize (β × β)
exact (hf.prod_mk hg).measurable isClosed_le_prod.measurableSet
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Supported
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Truncated
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.mul_coeff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Leading terms of Witt vector multiplication
The goal of this file is to study the leading terms of the formula for the `n+1`st coefficient
of a product of Witt vectors `x` and `y` over a ring of characteristic `p`.
We aim to isolate the `n+1`st coefficients of `x` and `y`, and express the rest of the product
in terms of a function of the lower coefficients.
For most of this file we work with terms of type `MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ`.
We will eventually evaluate them in `k`, but first we must take care of a calculation
that needs to happen in characteristic 0.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.nth_mul_coeff`: expresses the coefficient of a product of Witt vectors
in terms of the previous coefficients of the multiplicands.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace WittVector
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
variable {k : Type*} [CommRing k]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
-- Porting note: new notation
local notation "𝕄" => MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ
open Finset MvPolynomial
/--
```
(∑ i ∈ range n, (y.coeff i)^(p^(n-i)) * p^i.val) *
(∑ i ∈ range n, (y.coeff i)^(p^(n-i)) * p^i.val)
```
-/
def wittPolyProd (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) *
rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n)
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod WittVector.wittPolyProd
theorem wittPolyProd_vars (n : ℕ) : (wittPolyProd p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [wittPolyProd]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_rename _ _) ?_
simp [wittPolynomial_vars, image_subset_iff]
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_vars WittVector.wittPolyProd_vars
/-- The "remainder term" of `WittVector.wittPolyProd`. See `mul_polyOfInterest_aux2`. -/
def wittPolyProdRemainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
∑ i ∈ range n, (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i)
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_remainder WittVector.wittPolyProdRemainder
theorem wittPolyProdRemainder_vars (n : ℕ) :
(wittPolyProdRemainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range n := by
rw [wittPolyProdRemainder]
refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
have : (p : 𝕄) = C (p : ℤ) := by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast]
rw [this, vars_C]
apply empty_subset
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
apply Subset.trans (wittMul_vars _ _)
apply product_subset_product (Subset.refl _)
simp only [mem_range, range_subset] at hx ⊢
exact hx
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_remainder_vars WittVector.wittPolyProdRemainder_vars
/-- `remainder p n` represents the remainder term from `mul_polyOfInterest_aux3`.
`wittPolyProd p (n+1)` will have variables up to `n+1`,
but `remainder` will only have variables up to `n`.
-/
def remainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
(∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 0)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))) *
∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 1)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))
#align witt_vector.remainder WittVector.remainder
theorem remainder_vars (n : ℕ) : (remainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [remainder]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
rw [rename_monomial, vars_monomial, Finsupp.mapDomain_single]
· apply Subset.trans Finsupp.support_single_subset
simpa using mem_range.mp hx
· apply pow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.out.ne_zero
#align witt_vector.remainder_vars WittVector.remainder_vars
/-- This is the polynomial whose degree we want to get a handle on. -/
def polyOfInterest (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
wittMul p (n + 1) + (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) -
X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) -
X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1))
#align witt_vector.poly_of_interest WittVector.polyOfInterest
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i) = wittPolyProd p n := by
simp only [wittPolyProd]
convert wittStructureInt_prop p (X (0 : Fin 2) * X 1) n using 1
· simp only [wittPolynomial, wittMul]
rw [AlgHom.map_sum]
congr 1 with i
congr 1
have hsupp : (Finsupp.single i (p ^ (n - i))).support = {i} := by
rw [Finsupp.support_eq_singleton]
simp only [and_true_iff, Finsupp.single_eq_same, eq_self_iff_true, Ne]
exact pow_ne_zero _ hp.out.ne_zero
simp only [bind₁_monomial, hsupp, Int.cast_natCast, prod_singleton, eq_intCast,
Finsupp.single_eq_same, C_pow, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, true_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true,
Int.cast_pow]
· simp only [map_mul, bind₁_X_right]
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux1 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux1
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux2 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ n * wittMul p n + wittPolyProdRemainder p n = wittPolyProd p n := by
convert mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 p n
rw [sum_range_succ, add_comm, Nat.sub_self, pow_zero, pow_one]
rfl
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux2 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux2
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 (n : ℕ) : wittPolyProd p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
remainder p n := by
-- a useful auxiliary fact
have mvpz : (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) = MvPolynomial.C ((p : ℤ) ^ (n + 1)) := by norm_cast
-- Porting note: the original proof applies `sum_range_succ` through a non-`conv` rewrite,
-- but this does not work in Lean 4; the whole proof also times out very badly. The proof has been
-- nearly totally rewritten here and now finishes quite fast.
rw [wittPolyProd, wittPolynomial, AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_sum]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_lhs =>
arg 2
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_rhs =>
enter [1, 1, 2, 2]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_rhs =>
enter [1, 2, 2]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
simp only [add_mul, mul_add]
rw [add_comm _ (remainder p n)]
simp only [add_assoc]
apply congrArg (Add.add _)
ring
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux3 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux3
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/MulCoeff.lean | 179 | 186 | theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux4 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * wittMul p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(remainder p n - wittPolyProdRemainder p (n + 1)) := by |
rw [← add_sub_assoc, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, mul_polyOfInterest_aux2]
exact mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Order.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ULift
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
#align_import order.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
/-!
# (Semi-)lattices
Semilattices are partially ordered sets with join (least upper bound, or `sup`) or meet (greatest
lower bound, or `inf`) operations. Lattices are posets that are both join-semilattices and
meet-semilattices.
Distributive lattices are lattices which satisfy any of four equivalent distributivity properties,
of `sup` over `inf`, on the left or on the right.
## Main declarations
* `SemilatticeSup`: a type class for join semilattices
* `SemilatticeSup.mk'`: an alternative constructor for `SemilatticeSup` via proofs that `⊔` is
commutative, associative and idempotent.
* `SemilatticeInf`: a type class for meet semilattices
* `SemilatticeSup.mk'`: an alternative constructor for `SemilatticeInf` via proofs that `⊓` is
commutative, associative and idempotent.
* `Lattice`: a type class for lattices
* `Lattice.mk'`: an alternative constructor for `Lattice` via proofs that `⊔` and `⊓` are
commutative, associative and satisfy a pair of "absorption laws".
* `DistribLattice`: a type class for distributive lattices.
## Notations
* `a ⊔ b`: the supremum or join of `a` and `b`
* `a ⊓ b`: the infimum or meet of `a` and `b`
## TODO
* (Semi-)lattice homomorphisms
* Alternative constructors for distributive lattices from the other distributive properties
## Tags
semilattice, lattice
-/
/-- See if the term is `a ⊂ b` and the goal is `a ⊆ b`. -/
@[gcongr_forward] def exactSubsetOfSSubset : Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.ForwardExt where
eval h goal := do goal.assignIfDefeq (← Lean.Meta.mkAppM ``subset_of_ssubset #[h])
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
#align le_antisymm' le_antisymm
/-!
### Join-semilattices
-/
-- TODO: automatic construction of dual definitions / theorems
/-- A `SemilatticeSup` is a join-semilattice, that is, a partial order
with a join (a.k.a. lub / least upper bound, sup / supremum) operation
`⊔` which is the least element larger than both factors. -/
class SemilatticeSup (α : Type u) extends Sup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- The supremum is an upper bound on the first argument -/
protected le_sup_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ a ⊔ b
/-- The supremum is an upper bound on the second argument -/
protected le_sup_right : ∀ a b : α, b ≤ a ⊔ b
/-- The supremum is the *least* upper bound -/
protected sup_le : ∀ a b c : α, a ≤ c → b ≤ c → a ⊔ b ≤ c
#align semilattice_sup SemilatticeSup
/--
A type with a commutative, associative and idempotent binary `sup` operation has the structure of a
join-semilattice.
The partial order is defined so that `a ≤ b` unfolds to `a ⊔ b = b`; cf. `sup_eq_right`.
-/
def SemilatticeSup.mk' {α : Type*} [Sup α] (sup_comm : ∀ a b : α, a ⊔ b = b ⊔ a)
(sup_assoc : ∀ a b c : α, a ⊔ b ⊔ c = a ⊔ (b ⊔ c)) (sup_idem : ∀ a : α, a ⊔ a = a) :
SemilatticeSup α where
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le a b := a ⊔ b = b
le_refl := sup_idem
le_trans a b c hab hbc := by dsimp; rw [← hbc, ← sup_assoc, hab]
le_antisymm a b hab hba := by rwa [← hba, sup_comm]
le_sup_left a b := by dsimp; rw [← sup_assoc, sup_idem]
le_sup_right a b := by dsimp; rw [sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem]
sup_le a b c hac hbc := by dsimp; rwa [sup_assoc, hbc]
#align semilattice_sup.mk' SemilatticeSup.mk'
instance OrderDual.instSup (α : Type*) [Inf α] : Sup αᵒᵈ :=
⟨((· ⊓ ·) : α → α → α)⟩
instance OrderDual.instInf (α : Type*) [Sup α] : Inf αᵒᵈ :=
⟨((· ⊔ ·) : α → α → α)⟩
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_left : a ≤ a ⊔ b :=
SemilatticeSup.le_sup_left a b
#align le_sup_left le_sup_left
#align le_sup_left' le_sup_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-04")] alias le_sup_left' := le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_right : b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
SemilatticeSup.le_sup_right a b
#align le_sup_right le_sup_right
#align le_sup_right' le_sup_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-04")] alias le_sup_right' := le_sup_right
theorem le_sup_of_le_left (h : c ≤ a) : c ≤ a ⊔ b :=
le_trans h le_sup_left
#align le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_of_le_left
theorem le_sup_of_le_right (h : c ≤ b) : c ≤ a ⊔ b :=
le_trans h le_sup_right
#align le_sup_of_le_right le_sup_of_le_right
theorem lt_sup_of_lt_left (h : c < a) : c < a ⊔ b :=
h.trans_le le_sup_left
#align lt_sup_of_lt_left lt_sup_of_lt_left
theorem lt_sup_of_lt_right (h : c < b) : c < a ⊔ b :=
h.trans_le le_sup_right
#align lt_sup_of_lt_right lt_sup_of_lt_right
theorem sup_le : a ≤ c → b ≤ c → a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
SemilatticeSup.sup_le a b c
#align sup_le sup_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_le_iff : a ⊔ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h : a ⊔ b ≤ c => ⟨le_trans le_sup_left h, le_trans le_sup_right h⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => sup_le h₁ h₂⟩
#align sup_le_iff sup_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_left : a ⊔ b = a ↔ b ≤ a :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans <| by simp [le_rfl]
#align sup_eq_left sup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_right : a ⊔ b = b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans <| by simp [le_rfl]
#align sup_eq_right sup_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_sup : a = a ⊔ b ↔ b ≤ a :=
eq_comm.trans sup_eq_left
#align left_eq_sup left_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem right_eq_sup : b = a ⊔ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans sup_eq_right
#align right_eq_sup right_eq_sup
alias ⟨_, sup_of_le_left⟩ := sup_eq_left
#align sup_of_le_left sup_of_le_left
alias ⟨le_of_sup_eq, sup_of_le_right⟩ := sup_eq_right
#align sup_of_le_right sup_of_le_right
#align le_of_sup_eq le_of_sup_eq
attribute [simp] sup_of_le_left sup_of_le_right
@[simp]
theorem left_lt_sup : a < a ⊔ b ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
le_sup_left.lt_iff_ne.trans <| not_congr left_eq_sup
#align left_lt_sup left_lt_sup
@[simp]
theorem right_lt_sup : b < a ⊔ b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
le_sup_right.lt_iff_ne.trans <| not_congr right_eq_sup
#align right_lt_sup right_lt_sup
theorem left_or_right_lt_sup (h : a ≠ b) : a < a ⊔ b ∨ b < a ⊔ b :=
h.not_le_or_not_le.symm.imp left_lt_sup.2 right_lt_sup.2
#align left_or_right_lt_sup left_or_right_lt_sup
theorem le_iff_exists_sup : a ≤ b ↔ ∃ c, b = a ⊔ c := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨b, (sup_eq_right.mpr h).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨c, rfl : _ = _ ⊔ _⟩
exact le_sup_left
#align le_iff_exists_sup le_iff_exists_sup
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_le_sup (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ d :=
sup_le (le_sup_of_le_left h₁) (le_sup_of_le_right h₂)
#align sup_le_sup sup_le_sup
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_le_sup_left (h₁ : a ≤ b) (c) : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup le_rfl h₁
#align sup_le_sup_left sup_le_sup_left
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_le_sup_right (h₁ : a ≤ b) (c) : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c :=
sup_le_sup h₁ le_rfl
#align sup_le_sup_right sup_le_sup_right
theorem sup_idem (a : α) : a ⊔ a = a := by simp
#align sup_idem sup_idem
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := α) (· ⊔ ·) := ⟨sup_idem⟩
theorem sup_comm (a b : α) : a ⊔ b = b ⊔ a := by apply le_antisymm <;> simp
#align sup_comm sup_comm
instance : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⊔ ·) := ⟨sup_comm⟩
theorem sup_assoc (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⊔ c = a ⊔ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun x => by simp only [sup_le_iff]; rw [and_assoc]
#align sup_assoc sup_assoc
instance : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ⊔ ·) := ⟨sup_assoc⟩
theorem sup_left_right_swap (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⊔ c = c ⊔ b ⊔ a := by
rw [sup_comm, sup_comm a, sup_assoc]
#align sup_left_right_swap sup_left_right_swap
theorem sup_left_idem (a b : α) : a ⊔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊔ b := by simp
#align sup_left_idem sup_left_idem
theorem sup_right_idem (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⊔ b = a ⊔ b := by simp
#align sup_right_idem sup_right_idem
theorem sup_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⊔ (b ⊔ c) = b ⊔ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [← sup_assoc, ← sup_assoc, @sup_comm α _ a]
#align sup_left_comm sup_left_comm
theorem sup_right_comm (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⊔ c = a ⊔ c ⊔ b := by
rw [sup_assoc, sup_assoc, sup_comm b]
#align sup_right_comm sup_right_comm
theorem sup_sup_sup_comm (a b c d : α) : a ⊔ b ⊔ (c ⊔ d) = a ⊔ c ⊔ (b ⊔ d) := by
rw [sup_assoc, sup_left_comm b, ← sup_assoc]
#align sup_sup_sup_comm sup_sup_sup_comm
theorem sup_sup_distrib_left (a b c : α) : a ⊔ (b ⊔ c) = a ⊔ b ⊔ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [sup_sup_sup_comm, sup_idem]
#align sup_sup_distrib_left sup_sup_distrib_left
theorem sup_sup_distrib_right (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⊔ c = a ⊔ c ⊔ (b ⊔ c) := by
rw [sup_sup_sup_comm, sup_idem]
#align sup_sup_distrib_right sup_sup_distrib_right
theorem sup_congr_left (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) (hc : c ≤ a ⊔ b) : a ⊔ b = a ⊔ c :=
(sup_le le_sup_left hb).antisymm <| sup_le le_sup_left hc
#align sup_congr_left sup_congr_left
theorem sup_congr_right (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ⊔ c = b ⊔ c :=
(sup_le ha le_sup_right).antisymm <| sup_le hb le_sup_right
#align sup_congr_right sup_congr_right
theorem sup_eq_sup_iff_left : a ⊔ b = a ⊔ c ↔ b ≤ a ⊔ c ∧ c ≤ a ⊔ b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h ▸ le_sup_right, h.symm ▸ le_sup_right⟩, fun h => sup_congr_left h.1 h.2⟩
#align sup_eq_sup_iff_left sup_eq_sup_iff_left
theorem sup_eq_sup_iff_right : a ⊔ c = b ⊔ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h ▸ le_sup_left, h.symm ▸ le_sup_left⟩, fun h => sup_congr_right h.1 h.2⟩
#align sup_eq_sup_iff_right sup_eq_sup_iff_right
theorem Ne.lt_sup_or_lt_sup (hab : a ≠ b) : a < a ⊔ b ∨ b < a ⊔ b :=
hab.symm.not_le_or_not_le.imp left_lt_sup.2 right_lt_sup.2
#align ne.lt_sup_or_lt_sup Ne.lt_sup_or_lt_sup
/-- If `f` is monotone, `g` is antitone, and `f ≤ g`, then for all `a`, `b` we have `f a ≤ g b`. -/
theorem Monotone.forall_le_of_antitone {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : Antitone g) (h : f ≤ g) (m n : α) : f m ≤ g n :=
calc
f m ≤ f (m ⊔ n) := hf le_sup_left
_ ≤ g (m ⊔ n) := h _
_ ≤ g n := hg le_sup_right
#align monotone.forall_le_of_antitone Monotone.forall_le_of_antitone
theorem SemilatticeSup.ext_sup {α} {A B : SemilatticeSup α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y)
(x y : α) :
(haveI := A; x ⊔ y) = x ⊔ y :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [sup_le_iff]; rw [← H, @sup_le_iff α A, H, H]
#align semilattice_sup.ext_sup SemilatticeSup.ext_sup
theorem SemilatticeSup.ext {α} {A B : SemilatticeSup α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
A = B := by
have ss : A.toSup = B.toSup := by ext; apply SemilatticeSup.ext_sup H
cases A
cases B
cases PartialOrder.ext H
congr
#align semilattice_sup.ext SemilatticeSup.ext
theorem ite_le_sup (s s' : α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : ite P s s' ≤ s ⊔ s' :=
if h : P then (if_pos h).trans_le le_sup_left else (if_neg h).trans_le le_sup_right
#align ite_le_sup ite_le_sup
end SemilatticeSup
/-!
### Meet-semilattices
-/
/-- A `SemilatticeInf` is a meet-semilattice, that is, a partial order
with a meet (a.k.a. glb / greatest lower bound, inf / infimum) operation
`⊓` which is the greatest element smaller than both factors. -/
class SemilatticeInf (α : Type u) extends Inf α, PartialOrder α where
/-- The infimum is a lower bound on the first argument -/
protected inf_le_left : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ≤ a
/-- The infimum is a lower bound on the second argument -/
protected inf_le_right : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ≤ b
/-- The infimum is the *greatest* lower bound -/
protected le_inf : ∀ a b c : α, a ≤ b → a ≤ c → a ≤ b ⊓ c
#align semilattice_inf SemilatticeInf
instance OrderDual.instSemilatticeSup (α) [SemilatticeInf α] : SemilatticeSup αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder αᵒᵈ)
__ := inferInstanceAs (Sup αᵒᵈ)
le_sup_left := @SemilatticeInf.inf_le_left α _
le_sup_right := @SemilatticeInf.inf_le_right α _
sup_le := fun _ _ _ hca hcb => @SemilatticeInf.le_inf α _ _ _ _ hca hcb
instance OrderDual.instSemilatticeInf (α) [SemilatticeSup α] : SemilatticeInf αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder αᵒᵈ)
__ := inferInstanceAs (Inf αᵒᵈ)
inf_le_left := @le_sup_left α _
inf_le_right := @le_sup_right α _
le_inf := fun _ _ _ hca hcb => @sup_le α _ _ _ _ hca hcb
theorem SemilatticeSup.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : SemilatticeSup α] :
OrderDual.instSemilatticeSup αᵒᵈ = H :=
SemilatticeSup.ext fun _ _ => Iff.rfl
#align semilattice_sup.dual_dual SemilatticeSup.dual_dual
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_left : a ⊓ b ≤ a :=
SemilatticeInf.inf_le_left a b
#align inf_le_left inf_le_left
#align inf_le_left' inf_le_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-04")] alias inf_le_left' := inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_right : a ⊓ b ≤ b :=
SemilatticeInf.inf_le_right a b
#align inf_le_right inf_le_right
#align inf_le_right' inf_le_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-04")] alias inf_le_right' := inf_le_right
theorem le_inf : a ≤ b → a ≤ c → a ≤ b ⊓ c :=
SemilatticeInf.le_inf a b c
#align le_inf le_inf
theorem inf_le_of_left_le (h : a ≤ c) : a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
le_trans inf_le_left h
#align inf_le_of_left_le inf_le_of_left_le
theorem inf_le_of_right_le (h : b ≤ c) : a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
le_trans inf_le_right h
#align inf_le_of_right_le inf_le_of_right_le
theorem inf_lt_of_left_lt (h : a < c) : a ⊓ b < c :=
lt_of_le_of_lt inf_le_left h
#align inf_lt_of_left_lt inf_lt_of_left_lt
theorem inf_lt_of_right_lt (h : b < c) : a ⊓ b < c :=
lt_of_le_of_lt inf_le_right h
#align inf_lt_of_right_lt inf_lt_of_right_lt
@[simp]
theorem le_inf_iff : a ≤ b ⊓ c ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≤ c :=
@sup_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align le_inf_iff le_inf_iff
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_left : a ⊓ b = a ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans <| by simp [le_rfl]
#align inf_eq_left inf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_right : a ⊓ b = b ↔ b ≤ a :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans <| by simp [le_rfl]
#align inf_eq_right inf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_inf : a = a ⊓ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans inf_eq_left
#align left_eq_inf left_eq_inf
@[simp]
theorem right_eq_inf : b = a ⊓ b ↔ b ≤ a :=
eq_comm.trans inf_eq_right
#align right_eq_inf right_eq_inf
alias ⟨le_of_inf_eq, inf_of_le_left⟩ := inf_eq_left
#align inf_of_le_left inf_of_le_left
#align le_of_inf_eq le_of_inf_eq
alias ⟨_, inf_of_le_right⟩ := inf_eq_right
#align inf_of_le_right inf_of_le_right
attribute [simp] inf_of_le_left inf_of_le_right
@[simp]
theorem inf_lt_left : a ⊓ b < a ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
@left_lt_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align inf_lt_left inf_lt_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_lt_right : a ⊓ b < b ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
@right_lt_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align inf_lt_right inf_lt_right
theorem inf_lt_left_or_right (h : a ≠ b) : a ⊓ b < a ∨ a ⊓ b < b :=
@left_or_right_lt_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
#align inf_lt_left_or_right inf_lt_left_or_right
@[gcongr]
theorem inf_le_inf (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) : a ⊓ c ≤ b ⊓ d :=
@sup_le_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
#align inf_le_inf inf_le_inf
@[gcongr]
theorem inf_le_inf_right (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ≤ c) : b ⊓ a ≤ c ⊓ a :=
inf_le_inf h le_rfl
#align inf_le_inf_right inf_le_inf_right
@[gcongr]
theorem inf_le_inf_left (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ≤ c) : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⊓ c :=
inf_le_inf le_rfl h
#align inf_le_inf_left inf_le_inf_left
theorem inf_idem (a : α) : a ⊓ a = a := by simp
#align inf_idem inf_idem
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := α) (· ⊓ ·) := ⟨inf_idem⟩
theorem inf_comm (a b : α) : a ⊓ b = b ⊓ a := @sup_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align inf_comm inf_comm
instance : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⊓ ·) := ⟨inf_comm⟩
theorem inf_assoc (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b ⊓ c = a ⊓ (b ⊓ c) := @sup_assoc αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_assoc inf_assoc
instance : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ⊓ ·) := ⟨inf_assoc⟩
theorem inf_left_right_swap (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b ⊓ c = c ⊓ b ⊓ a :=
@sup_left_right_swap αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_left_right_swap inf_left_right_swap
theorem inf_left_idem (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊓ b := by simp
#align inf_left_idem inf_left_idem
theorem inf_right_idem (a b : α) : a ⊓ b ⊓ b = a ⊓ b := by simp
#align inf_right_idem inf_right_idem
theorem inf_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⊓ (b ⊓ c) = b ⊓ (a ⊓ c) :=
@sup_left_comm αᵒᵈ _ a b c
#align inf_left_comm inf_left_comm
theorem inf_right_comm (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b ⊓ c = a ⊓ c ⊓ b :=
@sup_right_comm αᵒᵈ _ a b c
#align inf_right_comm inf_right_comm
theorem inf_inf_inf_comm (a b c d : α) : a ⊓ b ⊓ (c ⊓ d) = a ⊓ c ⊓ (b ⊓ d) :=
@sup_sup_sup_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align inf_inf_inf_comm inf_inf_inf_comm
theorem inf_inf_distrib_left (a b c : α) : a ⊓ (b ⊓ c) = a ⊓ b ⊓ (a ⊓ c) :=
@sup_sup_distrib_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_inf_distrib_left inf_inf_distrib_left
theorem inf_inf_distrib_right (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b ⊓ c = a ⊓ c ⊓ (b ⊓ c) :=
@sup_sup_distrib_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_inf_distrib_right inf_inf_distrib_right
theorem inf_congr_left (hb : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hc : a ⊓ b ≤ c) : a ⊓ b = a ⊓ c :=
@sup_congr_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ hb hc
#align inf_congr_left inf_congr_left
theorem inf_congr_right (h1 : b ⊓ c ≤ a) (h2 : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ⊓ c = b ⊓ c :=
@sup_congr_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ h1 h2
#align inf_congr_right inf_congr_right
theorem inf_eq_inf_iff_left : a ⊓ b = a ⊓ c ↔ a ⊓ c ≤ b ∧ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
@sup_eq_sup_iff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_eq_inf_iff_left inf_eq_inf_iff_left
theorem inf_eq_inf_iff_right : a ⊓ c = b ⊓ c ↔ b ⊓ c ≤ a ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b :=
@sup_eq_sup_iff_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_eq_inf_iff_right inf_eq_inf_iff_right
theorem Ne.inf_lt_or_inf_lt : a ≠ b → a ⊓ b < a ∨ a ⊓ b < b :=
@Ne.lt_sup_or_lt_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align ne.inf_lt_or_inf_lt Ne.inf_lt_or_inf_lt
theorem SemilatticeInf.ext_inf {α} {A B : SemilatticeInf α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y)
(x y : α) :
(haveI := A; x ⊓ y) = x ⊓ y :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c => by simp only [le_inf_iff]; rw [← H, @le_inf_iff α A, H, H]
#align semilattice_inf.ext_inf SemilatticeInf.ext_inf
theorem SemilatticeInf.ext {α} {A B : SemilatticeInf α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
A = B := by
have ss : A.toInf = B.toInf := by ext; apply SemilatticeInf.ext_inf H
cases A
cases B
cases PartialOrder.ext H
congr
#align semilattice_inf.ext SemilatticeInf.ext
theorem SemilatticeInf.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : SemilatticeInf α] :
OrderDual.instSemilatticeInf αᵒᵈ = H :=
SemilatticeInf.ext fun _ _ => Iff.rfl
#align semilattice_inf.dual_dual SemilatticeInf.dual_dual
theorem inf_le_ite (s s' : α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : s ⊓ s' ≤ ite P s s' :=
@ite_le_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align inf_le_ite inf_le_ite
end SemilatticeInf
/--
A type with a commutative, associative and idempotent binary `inf` operation has the structure of a
meet-semilattice.
The partial order is defined so that `a ≤ b` unfolds to `b ⊓ a = a`; cf. `inf_eq_right`.
-/
def SemilatticeInf.mk' {α : Type*} [Inf α] (inf_comm : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b = b ⊓ a)
(inf_assoc : ∀ a b c : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ c = a ⊓ (b ⊓ c)) (inf_idem : ∀ a : α, a ⊓ a = a) :
SemilatticeInf α := by
haveI : SemilatticeSup αᵒᵈ := SemilatticeSup.mk' inf_comm inf_assoc inf_idem
haveI i := OrderDual.instSemilatticeInf αᵒᵈ
exact i
#align semilattice_inf.mk' SemilatticeInf.mk'
/-!
### Lattices
-/
/-- A lattice is a join-semilattice which is also a meet-semilattice. -/
class Lattice (α : Type u) extends SemilatticeSup α, SemilatticeInf α
#align lattice Lattice
instance OrderDual.instLattice (α) [Lattice α] : Lattice αᵒᵈ where
__ := OrderDual.instSemilatticeSup α
__ := OrderDual.instSemilatticeInf α
/-- The partial orders from `SemilatticeSup_mk'` and `SemilatticeInf_mk'` agree
if `sup` and `inf` satisfy the lattice absorption laws `sup_inf_self` (`a ⊔ a ⊓ b = a`)
and `inf_sup_self` (`a ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a`). -/
theorem semilatticeSup_mk'_partialOrder_eq_semilatticeInf_mk'_partialOrder
{α : Type*} [Sup α] [Inf α]
(sup_comm : ∀ a b : α, a ⊔ b = b ⊔ a) (sup_assoc : ∀ a b c : α, a ⊔ b ⊔ c = a ⊔ (b ⊔ c))
(sup_idem : ∀ a : α, a ⊔ a = a) (inf_comm : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b = b ⊓ a)
(inf_assoc : ∀ a b c : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ c = a ⊓ (b ⊓ c)) (inf_idem : ∀ a : α, a ⊓ a = a)
(sup_inf_self : ∀ a b : α, a ⊔ a ⊓ b = a) (inf_sup_self : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a) :
@SemilatticeSup.toPartialOrder _ (SemilatticeSup.mk' sup_comm sup_assoc sup_idem) =
@SemilatticeInf.toPartialOrder _ (SemilatticeInf.mk' inf_comm inf_assoc inf_idem) :=
PartialOrder.ext fun a b =>
show a ⊔ b = b ↔ b ⊓ a = a from
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, inf_comm, inf_sup_self], fun h => by rw [← h, sup_comm, sup_inf_self]⟩
#align semilattice_sup_mk'_partial_order_eq_semilattice_inf_mk'_partial_order semilatticeSup_mk'_partialOrder_eq_semilatticeInf_mk'_partialOrder
/-- A type with a pair of commutative and associative binary operations which satisfy two absorption
laws relating the two operations has the structure of a lattice.
The partial order is defined so that `a ≤ b` unfolds to `a ⊔ b = b`; cf. `sup_eq_right`.
-/
def Lattice.mk' {α : Type*} [Sup α] [Inf α] (sup_comm : ∀ a b : α, a ⊔ b = b ⊔ a)
(sup_assoc : ∀ a b c : α, a ⊔ b ⊔ c = a ⊔ (b ⊔ c)) (inf_comm : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b = b ⊓ a)
(inf_assoc : ∀ a b c : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ c = a ⊓ (b ⊓ c)) (sup_inf_self : ∀ a b : α, a ⊔ a ⊓ b = a)
(inf_sup_self : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a) : Lattice α :=
have sup_idem : ∀ b : α, b ⊔ b = b := fun b =>
calc
b ⊔ b = b ⊔ b ⊓ (b ⊔ b) := by rw [inf_sup_self]
_ = b := by rw [sup_inf_self]
have inf_idem : ∀ b : α, b ⊓ b = b := fun b =>
calc
b ⊓ b = b ⊓ (b ⊔ b ⊓ b) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = b := by rw [inf_sup_self]
let semilatt_inf_inst := SemilatticeInf.mk' inf_comm inf_assoc inf_idem
let semilatt_sup_inst := SemilatticeSup.mk' sup_comm sup_assoc sup_idem
have partial_order_eq : @SemilatticeSup.toPartialOrder _ semilatt_sup_inst =
@SemilatticeInf.toPartialOrder _ semilatt_inf_inst :=
semilatticeSup_mk'_partialOrder_eq_semilatticeInf_mk'_partialOrder _ _ _ _ _ _
sup_inf_self inf_sup_self
{ semilatt_sup_inst, semilatt_inf_inst with
inf_le_left := fun a b => by
rw [partial_order_eq]
apply inf_le_left,
inf_le_right := fun a b => by
rw [partial_order_eq]
apply inf_le_right,
le_inf := fun a b c => by
rw [partial_order_eq]
apply le_inf }
#align lattice.mk' Lattice.mk'
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] {a b c d : α}
theorem inf_le_sup : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
inf_le_left.trans le_sup_left
#align inf_le_sup inf_le_sup
theorem sup_le_inf : a ⊔ b ≤ a ⊓ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align sup_le_inf sup_le_inf
@[simp] lemma inf_eq_sup : a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b ↔ a = b := by rw [← inf_le_sup.ge_iff_eq, sup_le_inf]
#align inf_eq_sup inf_eq_sup
@[simp] lemma sup_eq_inf : a ⊔ b = a ⊓ b ↔ a = b := eq_comm.trans inf_eq_sup
#align sup_eq_inf sup_eq_inf
@[simp] lemma inf_lt_sup : a ⊓ b < a ⊔ b ↔ a ≠ b := by rw [inf_le_sup.lt_iff_ne, Ne, inf_eq_sup]
#align inf_lt_sup inf_lt_sup
lemma inf_eq_and_sup_eq_iff : a ⊓ b = c ∧ a ⊔ b = c ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl := sup_eq_inf.1 (h.2.trans h.1.symm)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨inf_idem _, sup_idem _⟩
#align inf_eq_and_sup_eq_iff inf_eq_and_sup_eq_iff
/-!
#### Distributivity laws
-/
-- TODO: better names?
theorem sup_inf_le : a ⊔ b ⊓ c ≤ (a ⊔ b) ⊓ (a ⊔ c) :=
le_inf (sup_le_sup_left inf_le_left _) (sup_le_sup_left inf_le_right _)
#align sup_inf_le sup_inf_le
theorem le_inf_sup : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ⊓ c ≤ a ⊓ (b ⊔ c) :=
sup_le (inf_le_inf_left _ le_sup_left) (inf_le_inf_left _ le_sup_right)
#align le_inf_sup le_inf_sup
theorem inf_sup_self : a ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a := by simp
#align inf_sup_self inf_sup_self
theorem sup_inf_self : a ⊔ a ⊓ b = a := by simp
#align sup_inf_self sup_inf_self
theorem sup_eq_iff_inf_eq : a ⊔ b = b ↔ a ⊓ b = a := by rw [sup_eq_right, ← inf_eq_left]
#align sup_eq_iff_inf_eq sup_eq_iff_inf_eq
theorem Lattice.ext {α} {A B : Lattice α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
A = B := by
cases A
cases B
cases SemilatticeSup.ext H
cases SemilatticeInf.ext H
congr
#align lattice.ext Lattice.ext
end Lattice
/-!
### Distributive lattices
-/
/-- A distributive lattice is a lattice that satisfies any of four
equivalent distributive properties (of `sup` over `inf` or `inf` over `sup`,
on the left or right).
The definition here chooses `le_sup_inf`: `(x ⊔ y) ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ≤ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z)`. To prove distributivity
from the dual law, use `DistribLattice.of_inf_sup_le`.
A classic example of a distributive lattice
is the lattice of subsets of a set, and in fact this example is
generic in the sense that every distributive lattice is realizable
as a sublattice of a powerset lattice. -/
class DistribLattice (α) extends Lattice α where
/-- The infimum distributes over the supremum -/
protected le_sup_inf : ∀ x y z : α, (x ⊔ y) ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ≤ x ⊔ y ⊓ z
#align distrib_lattice DistribLattice
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] {x y z : α}
theorem le_sup_inf : ∀ {x y z : α}, (x ⊔ y) ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ≤ x ⊔ y ⊓ z :=
fun {x y z} => DistribLattice.le_sup_inf x y z
#align le_sup_inf le_sup_inf
theorem sup_inf_left (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⊓ c = (a ⊔ b) ⊓ (a ⊔ c) :=
le_antisymm sup_inf_le le_sup_inf
#align sup_inf_left sup_inf_left
theorem sup_inf_right (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b ⊔ c = (a ⊔ c) ⊓ (b ⊔ c) := by
simp only [sup_inf_left, sup_comm _ c, eq_self_iff_true]
#align sup_inf_right sup_inf_right
theorem inf_sup_left (a b c : α) : a ⊓ (b ⊔ c) = a ⊓ b ⊔ a ⊓ c :=
calc
a ⊓ (b ⊔ c) = a ⊓ (a ⊔ c) ⊓ (b ⊔ c) := by rw [inf_sup_self]
_ = a ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⊔ c) := by simp only [inf_assoc, sup_inf_right, eq_self_iff_true]
_ = (a ⊔ a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⊔ c) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = (a ⊓ b ⊔ a) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⊔ c) := by rw [sup_comm]
_ = a ⊓ b ⊔ a ⊓ c := by rw [sup_inf_left]
#align inf_sup_left inf_sup_left
instance OrderDual.instDistribLattice (α : Type*) [DistribLattice α] : DistribLattice αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (Lattice αᵒᵈ)
le_sup_inf _ _ _ := (inf_sup_left _ _ _).le
theorem inf_sup_right (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ c = a ⊓ c ⊔ b ⊓ c := by
simp only [inf_sup_left, inf_comm _ c, eq_self_iff_true]
#align inf_sup_right inf_sup_right
theorem le_of_inf_le_sup_le (h₁ : x ⊓ z ≤ y ⊓ z) (h₂ : x ⊔ z ≤ y ⊔ z) : x ≤ y :=
calc
x ≤ y ⊓ z ⊔ x := le_sup_right
_ = (y ⊔ x) ⊓ (x ⊔ z) := by rw [sup_inf_right, sup_comm x]
_ ≤ (y ⊔ x) ⊓ (y ⊔ z) := inf_le_inf_left _ h₂
_ = y ⊔ x ⊓ z := by rw [← sup_inf_left]
_ ≤ y ⊔ y ⊓ z := sup_le_sup_left h₁ _
_ ≤ _ := sup_le (le_refl y) inf_le_left
#align le_of_inf_le_sup_le le_of_inf_le_sup_le
theorem eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq {a b c : α} (h₁ : b ⊓ a = c ⊓ a) (h₂ : b ⊔ a = c ⊔ a) : b = c :=
le_antisymm (le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_of_eq h₁) (le_of_eq h₂))
(le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_of_eq h₁.symm) (le_of_eq h₂.symm))
#align eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq
end DistribLattice
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Prove distributivity of an existing lattice from the dual distributive law. -/
abbrev DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe
[Lattice α] (inf_sup_le : ∀ a b c : α, a ⊓ (b ⊔ c) ≤ a ⊓ b ⊔ a ⊓ c) : DistribLattice α where
le_sup_inf := (@OrderDual.instDistribLattice αᵒᵈ {inferInstanceAs (Lattice αᵒᵈ) with
le_sup_inf := inf_sup_le}).le_sup_inf
#align distrib_lattice.of_inf_sup_le DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe
/-!
### Lattices derived from linear orders
-/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrder.toLattice {α : Type u} [o : LinearOrder α] : Lattice α where
__ := o
sup := max
le_sup_left := le_max_left; le_sup_right := le_max_right; sup_le _ _ _ := max_le
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left; inf_le_right := min_le_right; le_inf _ _ _ := le_min
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b c d : α}
theorem sup_eq_max : a ⊔ b = max a b :=
rfl
#align sup_eq_max sup_eq_max
theorem inf_eq_min : a ⊓ b = min a b :=
rfl
#align inf_eq_min inf_eq_min
theorem sup_ind (a b : α) {p : α → Prop} (ha : p a) (hb : p b) : p (a ⊔ b) :=
(IsTotal.total a b).elim (fun h : a ≤ b => by rwa [sup_eq_right.2 h]) fun h => by
rwa [sup_eq_left.2 h]
#align sup_ind sup_ind
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_iff : a ≤ b ⊔ c ↔ a ≤ b ∨ a ≤ c := by
exact ⟨fun h =>
(le_total c b).imp
(fun bc => by rwa [sup_eq_left.2 bc] at h)
(fun bc => by rwa [sup_eq_right.2 bc] at h),
fun h => h.elim le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_of_le_right⟩
#align le_sup_iff le_sup_iff
@[simp]
theorem lt_sup_iff : a < b ⊔ c ↔ a < b ∨ a < c := by
exact ⟨fun h =>
(le_total c b).imp
(fun bc => by rwa [sup_eq_left.2 bc] at h)
(fun bc => by rwa [sup_eq_right.2 bc] at h),
fun h => h.elim lt_sup_of_lt_left lt_sup_of_lt_right⟩
#align lt_sup_iff lt_sup_iff
@[simp]
theorem sup_lt_iff : b ⊔ c < a ↔ b < a ∧ c < a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_sup_left.trans_lt h, le_sup_right.trans_lt h⟩,
fun h => sup_ind (p := (· < a)) b c h.1 h.2⟩
#align sup_lt_iff sup_lt_iff
theorem inf_ind (a b : α) {p : α → Prop} : p a → p b → p (a ⊓ b) :=
@sup_ind αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_ind inf_ind
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_iff : b ⊓ c ≤ a ↔ b ≤ a ∨ c ≤ a :=
@le_sup_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_le_iff inf_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem inf_lt_iff : b ⊓ c < a ↔ b < a ∨ c < a :=
@lt_sup_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_lt_iff inf_lt_iff
@[simp]
theorem lt_inf_iff : a < b ⊓ c ↔ a < b ∧ a < c :=
@sup_lt_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align lt_inf_iff lt_inf_iff
variable (a b c d)
theorem max_max_max_comm : max (max a b) (max c d) = max (max a c) (max b d) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align max_max_max_comm max_max_max_comm
theorem min_min_min_comm : min (min a b) (min c d) = min (min a c) (min b d) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align min_min_min_comm min_min_min_comm
end LinearOrder
theorem sup_eq_maxDefault [SemilatticeSup α] [DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop)]
[IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] :
(· ⊔ ·) = (maxDefault : α → α → α) := by
ext x y
unfold maxDefault
split_ifs with h'
exacts [sup_of_le_right h', sup_of_le_left <| (total_of (· ≤ ·) x y).resolve_left h']
#align sup_eq_max_default sup_eq_maxDefault
| Mathlib/Order/Lattice.lean | 862 | 868 | theorem inf_eq_minDefault [SemilatticeInf α] [DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop)]
[IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] :
(· ⊓ ·) = (minDefault : α → α → α) := by |
ext x y
unfold minDefault
split_ifs with h'
exacts [inf_of_le_left h', inf_of_le_right <| (total_of (· ≤ ·) x y).resolve_left h']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Isabel Longbottom, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
#align_import set_theory.game.pgame from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8900d545017cd21961daa2a1734bb658ef52c618"
/-!
# Combinatorial (pre-)games.
The basic theory of combinatorial games, following Conway's book `On Numbers and Games`. We
construct "pregames", define an ordering and arithmetic operations on them, then show that the
operations descend to "games", defined via the equivalence relation `p ≈ q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ q ≤ p`.
The surreal numbers will be built as a quotient of a subtype of pregames.
A pregame (`SetTheory.PGame` below) is axiomatised via an inductive type, whose sole constructor
takes two types (thought of as indexing the possible moves for the players Left and Right), and a
pair of functions out of these types to `SetTheory.PGame` (thought of as describing the resulting
game after making a move).
Combinatorial games themselves, as a quotient of pregames, are constructed in `Game.lean`.
## Conway induction
By construction, the induction principle for pregames is exactly "Conway induction". That is, to
prove some predicate `SetTheory.PGame → Prop` holds for all pregames, it suffices to prove
that for every pregame `g`, if the predicate holds for every game resulting from making a move,
then it also holds for `g`.
While it is often convenient to work "by induction" on pregames, in some situations this becomes
awkward, so we also define accessor functions `SetTheory.PGame.LeftMoves`,
`SetTheory.PGame.RightMoves`, `SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft` and `SetTheory.PGame.moveRight`.
There is a relation `PGame.Subsequent p q`, saying that
`p` can be reached by playing some non-empty sequence of moves starting from `q`, an instance
`WellFounded Subsequent`, and a local tactic `pgame_wf_tac` which is helpful for discharging proof
obligations in inductive proofs relying on this relation.
## Order properties
Pregames have both a `≤` and a `<` relation, satisfying the usual properties of a `Preorder`. The
relation `0 < x` means that `x` can always be won by Left, while `0 ≤ x` means that `x` can be won
by Left as the second player.
It turns out to be quite convenient to define various relations on top of these. We define the "less
or fuzzy" relation `x ⧏ y` as `¬ y ≤ x`, the equivalence relation `x ≈ y` as `x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x`, and
the fuzzy relation `x ‖ y` as `x ⧏ y ∧ y ⧏ x`. If `0 ⧏ x`, then `x` can be won by Left as the
first player. If `x ≈ 0`, then `x` can be won by the second player. If `x ‖ 0`, then `x` can be won
by the first player.
Statements like `zero_le_lf`, `zero_lf_le`, etc. unfold these definitions. The theorems `le_def` and
`lf_def` give a recursive characterisation of each relation in terms of themselves two moves later.
The theorems `zero_le`, `zero_lf`, etc. also take into account that `0` has no moves.
Later, games will be defined as the quotient by the `≈` relation; that is to say, the
`Antisymmetrization` of `SetTheory.PGame`.
## Algebraic structures
We next turn to defining the operations necessary to make games into a commutative additive group.
Addition is defined for $x = \{xL | xR\}$ and $y = \{yL | yR\}$ by $x + y = \{xL + y, x + yL | xR +
y, x + yR\}$. Negation is defined by $\{xL | xR\} = \{-xR | -xL\}$.
The order structures interact in the expected way with addition, so we have
```
theorem le_iff_sub_nonneg {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y ↔ 0 ≤ y - x := sorry
theorem lt_iff_sub_pos {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ 0 < y - x := sorry
```
We show that these operations respect the equivalence relation, and hence descend to games. At the
level of games, these operations satisfy all the laws of a commutative group. To prove the necessary
equivalence relations at the level of pregames, we introduce the notion of a `Relabelling` of a
game, and show, for example, that there is a relabelling between `x + (y + z)` and `(x + y) + z`.
## Future work
* The theory of dominated and reversible positions, and unique normal form for short games.
* Analysis of basic domineering positions.
* Hex.
* Temperature.
* The development of surreal numbers, based on this development of combinatorial games, is still
quite incomplete.
## References
The material here is all drawn from
* [Conway, *On numbers and games*][conway2001]
An interested reader may like to formalise some of the material from
* [Andreas Blass, *A game semantics for linear logic*][MR1167694]
* [André Joyal, *Remarques sur la théorie des jeux à deux personnes*][joyal1997]
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace SetTheory
open Function Relation
-- We'd like to be able to use multi-character auto-implicits in this file.
set_option relaxedAutoImplicit true
/-! ### Pre-game moves -/
/-- The type of pre-games, before we have quotiented
by equivalence (`PGame.Setoid`). In ZFC, a combinatorial game is constructed from
two sets of combinatorial games that have been constructed at an earlier
stage. To do this in type theory, we say that a pre-game is built
inductively from two families of pre-games indexed over any type
in Type u. The resulting type `PGame.{u}` lives in `Type (u+1)`,
reflecting that it is a proper class in ZFC. -/
inductive PGame : Type (u + 1)
| mk : ∀ α β : Type u, (α → PGame) → (β → PGame) → PGame
#align pgame SetTheory.PGame
compile_inductive% PGame
namespace PGame
/-- The indexing type for allowable moves by Left. -/
def LeftMoves : PGame → Type u
| mk l _ _ _ => l
#align pgame.left_moves SetTheory.PGame.LeftMoves
/-- The indexing type for allowable moves by Right. -/
def RightMoves : PGame → Type u
| mk _ r _ _ => r
#align pgame.right_moves SetTheory.PGame.RightMoves
/-- The new game after Left makes an allowed move. -/
def moveLeft : ∀ g : PGame, LeftMoves g → PGame
| mk _l _ L _ => L
#align pgame.move_left SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft
/-- The new game after Right makes an allowed move. -/
def moveRight : ∀ g : PGame, RightMoves g → PGame
| mk _ _r _ R => R
#align pgame.move_right SetTheory.PGame.moveRight
@[simp]
theorem leftMoves_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).LeftMoves = xl :=
rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_mk SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_mk
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).moveLeft = xL :=
rfl
#align pgame.move_left_mk SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_mk
@[simp]
theorem rightMoves_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).RightMoves = xr :=
rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_mk SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_mk
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).moveRight = xR :=
rfl
#align pgame.move_right_mk SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_mk
-- TODO define this at the level of games, as well, and perhaps also for finsets of games.
/-- Construct a pre-game from list of pre-games describing the available moves for Left and Right.
-/
def ofLists (L R : List PGame.{u}) : PGame.{u} :=
mk (ULift (Fin L.length)) (ULift (Fin R.length)) (fun i => L.get i.down) fun j ↦ R.get j.down
#align pgame.of_lists SetTheory.PGame.ofLists
theorem leftMoves_ofLists (L R : List PGame) : (ofLists L R).LeftMoves = ULift (Fin L.length) :=
rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_ofLists
theorem rightMoves_ofLists (L R : List PGame) : (ofLists L R).RightMoves = ULift (Fin R.length) :=
rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_ofLists
/-- Converts a number into a left move for `ofLists`. -/
def toOfListsLeftMoves {L R : List PGame} : Fin L.length ≃ (ofLists L R).LeftMoves :=
((Equiv.cast (leftMoves_ofLists L R).symm).trans Equiv.ulift).symm
#align pgame.to_of_lists_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.toOfListsLeftMoves
/-- Converts a number into a right move for `ofLists`. -/
def toOfListsRightMoves {L R : List PGame} : Fin R.length ≃ (ofLists L R).RightMoves :=
((Equiv.cast (rightMoves_ofLists L R).symm).trans Equiv.ulift).symm
#align pgame.to_of_lists_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.toOfListsRightMoves
theorem ofLists_moveLeft {L R : List PGame} (i : Fin L.length) :
(ofLists L R).moveLeft (toOfListsLeftMoves i) = L.get i :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_left SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem ofLists_moveLeft' {L R : List PGame} (i : (ofLists L R).LeftMoves) :
(ofLists L R).moveLeft i = L.get (toOfListsLeftMoves.symm i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_left' SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveLeft'
theorem ofLists_moveRight {L R : List PGame} (i : Fin R.length) :
(ofLists L R).moveRight (toOfListsRightMoves i) = R.get i :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_right SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveRight
@[simp]
theorem ofLists_moveRight' {L R : List PGame} (i : (ofLists L R).RightMoves) :
(ofLists L R).moveRight i = R.get (toOfListsRightMoves.symm i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_right' SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveRight'
/-- A variant of `PGame.recOn` expressed in terms of `PGame.moveLeft` and `PGame.moveRight`.
Both this and `PGame.recOn` describe Conway induction on games. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def moveRecOn {C : PGame → Sort*} (x : PGame)
(IH : ∀ y : PGame, (∀ i, C (y.moveLeft i)) → (∀ j, C (y.moveRight j)) → C y) : C x :=
x.recOn fun yl yr yL yR => IH (mk yl yr yL yR)
#align pgame.move_rec_on SetTheory.PGame.moveRecOn
/-- `IsOption x y` means that `x` is either a left or right option for `y`. -/
@[mk_iff]
inductive IsOption : PGame → PGame → Prop
| moveLeft {x : PGame} (i : x.LeftMoves) : IsOption (x.moveLeft i) x
| moveRight {x : PGame} (i : x.RightMoves) : IsOption (x.moveRight i) x
#align pgame.is_option SetTheory.PGame.IsOption
theorem IsOption.mk_left {xl xr : Type u} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xl) :
(xL i).IsOption (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@IsOption.moveLeft (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.is_option.mk_left SetTheory.PGame.IsOption.mk_left
theorem IsOption.mk_right {xl xr : Type u} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xr) :
(xR i).IsOption (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@IsOption.moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.is_option.mk_right SetTheory.PGame.IsOption.mk_right
theorem wf_isOption : WellFounded IsOption :=
⟨fun x =>
moveRecOn x fun x IHl IHr =>
Acc.intro x fun y h => by
induction' h with _ i _ j
· exact IHl i
· exact IHr j⟩
#align pgame.wf_is_option SetTheory.PGame.wf_isOption
/-- `Subsequent x y` says that `x` can be obtained by playing some nonempty sequence of moves from
`y`. It is the transitive closure of `IsOption`. -/
def Subsequent : PGame → PGame → Prop :=
TransGen IsOption
#align pgame.subsequent SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent
instance : IsTrans _ Subsequent :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsTrans _ (TransGen _)
@[trans]
theorem Subsequent.trans {x y z} : Subsequent x y → Subsequent y z → Subsequent x z :=
TransGen.trans
#align pgame.subsequent.trans SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.trans
theorem wf_subsequent : WellFounded Subsequent :=
wf_isOption.transGen
#align pgame.wf_subsequent SetTheory.PGame.wf_subsequent
instance : WellFoundedRelation PGame :=
⟨_, wf_subsequent⟩
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.moveLeft {x : PGame} (i : x.LeftMoves) : Subsequent (x.moveLeft i) x :=
TransGen.single (IsOption.moveLeft i)
#align pgame.subsequent.move_left SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.moveRight {x : PGame} (j : x.RightMoves) : Subsequent (x.moveRight j) x :=
TransGen.single (IsOption.moveRight j)
#align pgame.subsequent.move_right SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.moveRight
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_left {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xl) :
Subsequent (xL i) (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@Subsequent.moveLeft (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.subsequent.mk_left SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.mk_left
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_right {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j : xr) :
Subsequent (xR j) (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@Subsequent.moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) j
#align pgame.subsequent.mk_right SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.mk_right
/--
Discharges proof obligations of the form `⊢ Subsequent ..` arising in termination proofs
of definitions using well-founded recursion on `PGame`.
-/
macro "pgame_wf_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic| solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 8 })
[Prod.Lex.left, Prod.Lex.right, PSigma.Lex.left, PSigma.Lex.right,
Subsequent.moveLeft, Subsequent.moveRight, Subsequent.mk_left, Subsequent.mk_right,
Subsequent.trans] )
-- Register some consequences of pgame_wf_tac as simp-lemmas for convenience
-- (which are applied by default for WF goals)
-- This is different from mk_right from the POV of the simplifier,
-- because the unifier can't solve `xr =?= RightMoves (mk xl xr xL xR)` at reducible transparency.
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_right' (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j : RightMoves (mk xl xr xL xR)) :
Subsequent (xR j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveRight_mk_left (xL : xl → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xL i).moveRight j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveRight_mk_right (xR : xr → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xR i).moveRight j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveLeft_mk_left (xL : xl → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xL i).moveLeft j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveLeft_mk_right (xR : xr → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xR i).moveLeft j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
-- Porting note: linter claims these lemmas don't simplify?
open Subsequent in attribute [nolint simpNF] mk_left mk_right mk_right'
moveRight_mk_left moveRight_mk_right moveLeft_mk_left moveLeft_mk_right
/-! ### Basic pre-games -/
/-- The pre-game `Zero` is defined by `0 = { | }`. -/
instance : Zero PGame :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, PEmpty, PEmpty.elim, PEmpty.elim⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_leftMoves : LeftMoves 0 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_leftMoves
@[simp]
theorem zero_rightMoves : RightMoves 0 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_rightMoves
instance isEmpty_zero_leftMoves : IsEmpty (LeftMoves 0) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_zero_leftMoves
instance isEmpty_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (RightMoves 0) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_zero_rightMoves
instance : Inhabited PGame :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The pre-game `One` is defined by `1 = { 0 | }`. -/
instance instOnePGame : One PGame :=
⟨⟨PUnit, PEmpty, fun _ => 0, PEmpty.elim⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_leftMoves : LeftMoves 1 = PUnit :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.one_leftMoves
@[simp]
theorem one_moveLeft (x) : moveLeft 1 x = 0 :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_move_left SetTheory.PGame.one_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem one_rightMoves : RightMoves 1 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.one_rightMoves
instance uniqueOneLeftMoves : Unique (LeftMoves 1) :=
PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniqueOneLeftMoves
instance isEmpty_one_rightMoves : IsEmpty (RightMoves 1) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_one_rightMoves
/-! ### Pre-game order relations -/
/-- The less or equal relation on pre-games.
If `0 ≤ x`, then Left can win `x` as the second player. -/
instance le : LE PGame :=
⟨Sym2.GameAdd.fix wf_isOption fun x y le =>
(∀ i, ¬le y (x.moveLeft i) (Sym2.GameAdd.snd_fst <| IsOption.moveLeft i)) ∧
∀ j, ¬le (y.moveRight j) x (Sym2.GameAdd.fst_snd <| IsOption.moveRight j)⟩
/-- The less or fuzzy relation on pre-games.
If `0 ⧏ x`, then Left can win `x` as the first player. -/
def LF (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
¬y ≤ x
#align pgame.lf SetTheory.PGame.LF
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infixl:50 " ⧏ " => PGame.LF
@[simp]
protected theorem not_le {x y : PGame} : ¬x ≤ y ↔ y ⧏ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align pgame.not_le SetTheory.PGame.not_le
@[simp]
theorem not_lf {x y : PGame} : ¬x ⧏ y ↔ y ≤ x :=
Classical.not_not
#align pgame.not_lf SetTheory.PGame.not_lf
theorem _root_.LE.le.not_gf {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y → ¬y ⧏ x :=
not_lf.2
#align has_le.le.not_gf LE.le.not_gf
theorem LF.not_ge {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y → ¬y ≤ x :=
id
#align pgame.lf.not_ge SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_ge
/-- Definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏`.
The ordering here is chosen so that `And.left` refer to moves by Left, and `And.right` refer to
moves by Right. -/
theorem le_iff_forall_lf {x y : PGame} :
x ≤ y ↔ (∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ y) ∧ ∀ j, x ⧏ y.moveRight j := by
unfold LE.le le
simp only
rw [Sym2.GameAdd.fix_eq]
rfl
#align pgame.le_iff_forall_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_iff_forall_lf
/-- Definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games built using the constructor. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk {xl xr xL xR yl yr yL yR} :
mk xl xr xL xR ≤ mk yl yr yL yR ↔ (∀ i, xL i ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR) ∧ ∀ j, mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ yR j :=
le_iff_forall_lf
#align pgame.mk_le_mk SetTheory.PGame.mk_le_mk
theorem le_of_forall_lf {x y : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ y) (h₂ : ∀ j, x ⧏ y.moveRight j) :
x ≤ y :=
le_iff_forall_lf.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align pgame.le_of_forall_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_of_forall_lf
/-- Definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games, in terms of `≤`.
The ordering here is chosen so that `or.inl` refer to moves by Left, and `or.inr` refer to
moves by Right. -/
theorem lf_iff_exists_le {x y : PGame} :
x ⧏ y ↔ (∃ i, x ≤ y.moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ y := by
rw [LF, le_iff_forall_lf, not_and_or]
simp
#align pgame.lf_iff_exists_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_iff_exists_le
/-- Definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games built using the constructor. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_lf_mk {xl xr xL xR yl yr yL yR} :
mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR ↔ (∃ i, mk xl xr xL xR ≤ yL i) ∨ ∃ j, xR j ≤ mk yl yr yL yR :=
lf_iff_exists_le
#align pgame.mk_lf_mk SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf_mk
theorem le_or_gf (x y : PGame) : x ≤ y ∨ y ⧏ x := by
rw [← PGame.not_le]
apply em
#align pgame.le_or_gf SetTheory.PGame.le_or_gf
theorem moveLeft_lf_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) (i) : x.moveLeft i ⧏ y :=
(le_iff_forall_lf.1 h).1 i
#align pgame.move_left_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_lf_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.moveLeft_lf := moveLeft_lf_of_le
#align has_le.le.move_left_lf LE.le.moveLeft_lf
theorem lf_moveRight_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) (j) : x ⧏ y.moveRight j :=
(le_iff_forall_lf.1 h).2 j
#align pgame.lf_move_right_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_moveRight_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.lf_moveRight := lf_moveRight_of_le
#align has_le.le.lf_move_right LE.le.lf_moveRight
theorem lf_of_moveRight_le {x y : PGame} {j} (h : x.moveRight j ≤ y) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_exists_le.2 <| Or.inr ⟨j, h⟩
#align pgame.lf_of_move_right_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_moveRight_le
theorem lf_of_le_moveLeft {x y : PGame} {i} (h : x ≤ y.moveLeft i) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_exists_le.2 <| Or.inl ⟨i, h⟩
#align pgame.lf_of_le_move_left SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_moveLeft
theorem lf_of_le_mk {xl xr xL xR y} : mk xl xr xL xR ≤ y → ∀ i, xL i ⧏ y :=
moveLeft_lf_of_le
#align pgame.lf_of_le_mk SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_mk
theorem lf_of_mk_le {x yl yr yL yR} : x ≤ mk yl yr yL yR → ∀ j, x ⧏ yR j :=
lf_moveRight_of_le
#align pgame.lf_of_mk_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_mk_le
theorem mk_lf_of_le {xl xr y j} (xL) {xR : xr → PGame} : xR j ≤ y → mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ y :=
@lf_of_moveRight_le (mk _ _ _ _) y j
#align pgame.mk_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf_of_le
theorem lf_mk_of_le {x yl yr} {yL : yl → PGame} (yR) {i} : x ≤ yL i → x ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR :=
@lf_of_le_moveLeft x (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.lf_mk_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_mk_of_le
/- We prove that `x ≤ y → y ≤ z → x ≤ z` inductively, by also simultaneously proving its cyclic
reorderings. This auxiliary lemma is used during said induction. -/
private theorem le_trans_aux {x y z : PGame}
(h₁ : ∀ {i}, y ≤ z → z ≤ x.moveLeft i → y ≤ x.moveLeft i)
(h₂ : ∀ {j}, z.moveRight j ≤ x → x ≤ y → z.moveRight j ≤ y) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ z :=
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => PGame.not_le.1 fun h => (h₁ hyz h).not_gf <| hxy.moveLeft_lf i)
fun j => PGame.not_le.1 fun h => (h₂ h hxy).not_gf <| hyz.lf_moveRight j
instance : Preorder PGame :=
{ PGame.le with
le_refl := fun x => by
induction' x with _ _ _ _ IHl IHr
exact
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => lf_of_le_moveLeft (IHl i)) fun i => lf_of_moveRight_le (IHr i)
le_trans := by
suffices
∀ {x y z : PGame},
(x ≤ y → y ≤ z → x ≤ z) ∧ (y ≤ z → z ≤ x → y ≤ x) ∧ (z ≤ x → x ≤ y → z ≤ y) from
fun x y z => this.1
intro x y z
induction' x with xl xr xL xR IHxl IHxr generalizing y z
induction' y with yl yr yL yR IHyl IHyr generalizing z
induction' z with zl zr zL zR IHzl IHzr
exact
⟨le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHxl i).2.1) fun {j} => (IHzr j).2.2,
le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHyl i).2.2) fun {j} => (IHxr j).1,
le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHzl i).1) fun {j} => (IHyr j).2.1⟩
lt := fun x y => x ≤ y ∧ x ⧏ y }
theorem lt_iff_le_and_lf {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ x ⧏ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align pgame.lt_iff_le_and_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_iff_le_and_lf
theorem lt_of_le_of_lf {x y : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : x ⧏ y) : x < y :=
⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align pgame.lt_of_le_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_of_le_of_lf
theorem lf_of_lt {x y : PGame} (h : x < y) : x ⧏ y :=
h.2
#align pgame.lf_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.lf := lf_of_lt
#align has_lt.lt.lf LT.lt.lf
theorem lf_irrefl (x : PGame) : ¬x ⧏ x :=
le_rfl.not_gf
#align pgame.lf_irrefl SetTheory.PGame.lf_irrefl
instance : IsIrrefl _ (· ⧏ ·) :=
⟨lf_irrefl⟩
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_le_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : y ⧏ z) : x ⧏ z := by
rw [← PGame.not_le] at h₂ ⊢
exact fun h₃ => h₂ (h₃.trans h₁)
#align pgame.lf_of_le_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_of_lf
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance : Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ⧏ ·) (· ⧏ ·) := ⟨lf_of_le_of_lf⟩
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_le {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y ≤ z) : x ⧏ z := by
rw [← PGame.not_le] at h₁ ⊢
exact fun h₃ => h₁ (h₂.trans h₃)
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_le
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance : Trans (· ⧏ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ⧏ ·) := ⟨lf_of_lf_of_le⟩
alias _root_.LE.le.trans_lf := lf_of_le_of_lf
#align has_le.le.trans_lf LE.le.trans_lf
alias LF.trans_le := lf_of_lf_of_le
#align pgame.lf.trans_le SetTheory.PGame.LF.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lt_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : y ⧏ z) : x ⧏ z :=
h₁.le.trans_lf h₂
#align pgame.lf_of_lt_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lt_of_lf
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_lt {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y < z) : x ⧏ z :=
h₁.trans_le h₂.le
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.trans_lf := lf_of_lt_of_lf
#align has_lt.lt.trans_lf LT.lt.trans_lf
alias LF.trans_lt := lf_of_lf_of_lt
#align pgame.lf.trans_lt SetTheory.PGame.LF.trans_lt
theorem moveLeft_lf {x : PGame} : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ x :=
le_rfl.moveLeft_lf
#align pgame.move_left_lf SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_lf
theorem lf_moveRight {x : PGame} : ∀ j, x ⧏ x.moveRight j :=
le_rfl.lf_moveRight
#align pgame.lf_move_right SetTheory.PGame.lf_moveRight
theorem lf_mk {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i) : xL i ⧏ mk xl xr xL xR :=
@moveLeft_lf (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.lf_mk SetTheory.PGame.lf_mk
theorem mk_lf {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j) : mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ xR j :=
@lf_moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) j
#align pgame.mk_lf SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf
/-- This special case of `PGame.le_of_forall_lf` is useful when dealing with surreals, where `<` is
preferred over `⧏`. -/
theorem le_of_forall_lt {x y : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i < y) (h₂ : ∀ j, x < y.moveRight j) :
x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => (h₁ i).lf) fun i => (h₂ i).lf
#align pgame.le_of_forall_lt SetTheory.PGame.le_of_forall_lt
/-- The definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games, in terms of `≤` two moves later. -/
theorem le_def {x y : PGame} :
x ≤ y ↔
(∀ i, (∃ i', x.moveLeft i ≤ y.moveLeft i') ∨ ∃ j, (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j ≤ y) ∧
∀ j, (∃ i, x ≤ (y.moveRight j).moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j', x.moveRight j' ≤ y.moveRight j := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
conv =>
lhs
simp only [lf_iff_exists_le]
#align pgame.le_def SetTheory.PGame.le_def
/-- The definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏` two moves later. -/
theorem lf_def {x y : PGame} :
x ⧏ y ↔
(∃ i, (∀ i', x.moveLeft i' ⧏ y.moveLeft i) ∧ ∀ j, x ⧏ (y.moveLeft i).moveRight j) ∨
∃ j, (∀ i, (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i ⧏ y) ∧ ∀ j', x.moveRight j ⧏ y.moveRight j' := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
conv =>
lhs
simp only [le_iff_forall_lf]
#align pgame.lf_def SetTheory.PGame.lf_def
/-- The definition of `0 ≤ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ⧏`. -/
theorem zero_le_lf {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ x ↔ ∀ j, 0 ⧏ x.moveRight j := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
simp
#align pgame.zero_le_lf SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_lf
/-- The definition of `x ≤ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏ 0`. -/
theorem le_zero_lf {x : PGame} : x ≤ 0 ↔ ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ 0 := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
simp
#align pgame.le_zero_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_zero_lf
/-- The definition of `0 ⧏ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ≤`. -/
theorem zero_lf_le {x : PGame} : 0 ⧏ x ↔ ∃ i, 0 ≤ x.moveLeft i := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
simp
#align pgame.zero_lf_le SetTheory.PGame.zero_lf_le
/-- The definition of `x ⧏ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `≤ 0`. -/
theorem lf_zero_le {x : PGame} : x ⧏ 0 ↔ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ 0 := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
simp
#align pgame.lf_zero_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_zero_le
/-- The definition of `0 ≤ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ≤` two moves later. -/
theorem zero_le {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ x ↔ ∀ j, ∃ i, 0 ≤ (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i := by
rw [le_def]
simp
#align pgame.zero_le SetTheory.PGame.zero_le
/-- The definition of `x ≤ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `≤ 0` two moves later. -/
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/PGame.lean | 677 | 679 | theorem le_zero {x : PGame} : x ≤ 0 ↔ ∀ i, ∃ j, (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j ≤ 0 := by |
rw [le_def]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Martin Dvorak. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Martin Dvorak, Kyle Miller, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.cross_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"91288e351d51b3f0748f0a38faa7613fb0ae2ada"
/-!
# Cross products
This module defines the cross product of vectors in $R^3$ for $R$ a commutative ring,
as a bilinear map.
## Main definitions
* `crossProduct` is the cross product of pairs of vectors in $R^3$.
## Main results
* `triple_product_eq_det`
* `cross_dot_cross`
* `jacobi_cross`
## Notation
The locale `Matrix` gives the following notation:
* `×₃` for the cross product
## Tags
crossproduct
-/
open Matrix
open Matrix
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
/-- The cross product of two vectors in $R^3$ for $R$ a commutative ring. -/
def crossProduct : (Fin 3 → R) →ₗ[R] (Fin 3 → R) →ₗ[R] Fin 3 → R := by
apply LinearMap.mk₂ R fun a b : Fin 3 → R =>
![a 1 * b 2 - a 2 * b 1, a 2 * b 0 - a 0 * b 2, a 0 * b 1 - a 1 * b 0]
· intros
simp_rw [vec3_add, Pi.add_apply]
apply vec3_eq <;> ring
· intros
simp_rw [smul_vec3, Pi.smul_apply, smul_sub, smul_mul_assoc]
· intros
simp_rw [vec3_add, Pi.add_apply]
apply vec3_eq <;> ring
· intros
simp_rw [smul_vec3, Pi.smul_apply, smul_sub, mul_smul_comm]
#align cross_product crossProduct
scoped[Matrix] infixl:74 " ×₃ " => crossProduct
theorem cross_apply (a b : Fin 3 → R) :
a ×₃ b = ![a 1 * b 2 - a 2 * b 1, a 2 * b 0 - a 0 * b 2, a 0 * b 1 - a 1 * b 0] := rfl
#align cross_apply cross_apply
section ProductsProperties
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma,
likely due to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3807 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem cross_anticomm (v w : Fin 3 → R) : -(v ×₃ w) = w ×₃ v := by
simp [cross_apply, mul_comm]
#align cross_anticomm cross_anticomm
alias neg_cross := cross_anticomm
#align neg_cross neg_cross
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma,
likely due to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3807 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CrossProduct.lean | 86 | 87 | theorem cross_anticomm' (v w : Fin 3 → R) : v ×₃ w + w ×₃ v = 0 := by |
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, cross_anticomm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.IntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.roots_of_unity.minpoly from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7fdeecc0d03cd40f7a165e6cf00a4d2286db599f"
/-!
# Minimal polynomial of roots of unity
We gather several results about minimal polynomial of root of unity.
## Main results
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.totient_le_degree_minpoly`: The degree of the minimal polynomial of an `n`-th
primitive root of unity is at least `totient n`.
-/
open minpoly Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CommRing
variable {n : ℕ} {K : Type*} [CommRing K] {μ : K} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot μ n)
/-- `μ` is integral over `ℤ`. -/
-- Porting note: `hpos` was in the `variable` line, with an `omit` in mathlib3 just after this
-- declaration. For some reason, in Lean4, `hpos` gets included also in the declarations below,
-- even if it is not used in the proof.
theorem isIntegral (hpos : 0 < n) : IsIntegral ℤ μ := by
use X ^ n - 1
constructor
· exact monic_X_pow_sub_C 1 (ne_of_lt hpos).symm
· simp only [((IsPrimitiveRoot.iff_def μ n).mp h).left, eval₂_one, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_sub,
sub_self]
#align is_primitive_root.is_integral IsPrimitiveRoot.isIntegral
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K] [CharZero K]
/-- The minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` divides `X ^ n - 1`. -/
theorem minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one : minpoly ℤ μ ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | h0)
· simp
apply minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (isIntegral h h0)
simp only [((IsPrimitiveRoot.iff_def μ n).mp h).left, aeval_X_pow, eq_intCast, Int.cast_one,
aeval_one, AlgHom.map_sub, sub_self]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_primitive_root.minpoly_dvd_X_pow_sub_one IsPrimitiveRoot.minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one
/-- The reduction modulo `p` of the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` is separable. -/
theorem separable_minpoly_mod {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
Separable (map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ)) := by
have hdvd : map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ) ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by
convert RingHom.map_dvd (mapRingHom (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)))
(minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one h)
simp only [map_sub, map_pow, coe_mapRingHom, map_X, map_one]
refine Separable.of_dvd (separable_X_pow_sub_C 1 ?_ one_ne_zero) hdvd
by_contra hzero
exact hdiv ((ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd n p).1 hzero)
#align is_primitive_root.separable_minpoly_mod IsPrimitiveRoot.separable_minpoly_mod
/-- The reduction modulo `p` of the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` is squarefree. -/
theorem squarefree_minpoly_mod {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
Squarefree (map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ)) :=
(separable_minpoly_mod h hdiv).squarefree
#align is_primitive_root.squarefree_minpoly_mod IsPrimitiveRoot.squarefree_minpoly_mod
/-- Let `P` be the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` and `Q` be the minimal polynomial of
`μ ^ p`, where `p` is a natural number that does not divide `n`. Then `P` divides `expand ℤ p Q`. -/
theorem minpoly_dvd_expand {p : ℕ} (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
minpoly ℤ μ ∣ expand ℤ p (minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)) := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· simp_all
letI : IsIntegrallyClosed ℤ := GCDMonoid.toIsIntegrallyClosed
refine minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (h.isIntegral hpos) ?_
rw [aeval_def, coe_expand, ← comp, eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_comp, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X,
eval_comp, eval_pow, eval_X, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← aeval_def]
exact minpoly.aeval _ _
#align is_primitive_root.minpoly_dvd_expand IsPrimitiveRoot.minpoly_dvd_expand
/-- Let `P` be the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` and `Q` be the minimal polynomial of
`μ ^ p`, where `p` is a prime that does not divide `n`. Then `P` divides `Q ^ p` modulo `p`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Minpoly.lean | 95 | 104 | theorem minpoly_dvd_pow_mod {p : ℕ} [hprime : Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ) ∣
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)) ^ p := by |
set Q := minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)
have hfrob :
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) Q ^ p = map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (expand ℤ p Q) := by
rw [← ZMod.expand_card, map_expand]
rw [hfrob]
apply RingHom.map_dvd (mapRingHom (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)))
exact minpoly_dvd_expand h hdiv
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NthRewrite
#align_import data.nat.gcd.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Definitions and properties of `Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, and `Nat.coprime`
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `GCDMonoid.gcd` and
`GCDMonoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `IsCoprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `Nat.coprime`, see
`Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
-/
namespace Nat
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
#align nat.gcd_greatest Nat.gcd_greatest
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + k * m) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + k * m), gcd_rec m n]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_right_right Nat.gcd_add_mul_right_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m * k) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + m * k), gcd_rec m n]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right Nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 45 | 45 | theorem gcd_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (k * m + n) = gcd m n := by | simp [add_comm _ n]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.BaseChange
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Solvable
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
#align_import algebra.lie.nilpotent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
/-!
# Nilpotent Lie algebras
Like groups, Lie algebras admit a natural concept of nilpotency. More generally, any Lie module
carries a natural concept of nilpotency. We define these here via the lower central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.lowerCentralSeries`
* `LieModule.IsNilpotent`
## Tags
lie algebra, lower central series, nilpotent
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section NilpotentModules
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable (k : ℕ) (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
namespace LieSubmodule
/-- A generalisation of the lower central series. The zeroth term is a specified Lie submodule of
a Lie module. In the case when we specify the top ideal `⊤` of the Lie algebra, regarded as a Lie
module over itself, we get the usual lower central series of a Lie algebra.
It can be more convenient to work with this generalisation when considering the lower central series
of a Lie submodule, regarded as a Lie module in its own right, since it provides a type-theoretic
expression of the fact that the terms of the Lie submodule's lower central series are also Lie
submodules of the enclosing Lie module.
See also `LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap` and
`LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs` below, as well as `LieSubmodule.ucs`. -/
def lcs : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
(fun N => ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆)^[k]
#align lie_submodule.lcs LieSubmodule.lcs
@[simp]
theorem lcs_zero (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : N.lcs 0 = N :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.lcs_zero LieSubmodule.lcs_zero
@[simp]
theorem lcs_succ : N.lcs (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N.lcs k⁆ :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' (fun N' => ⁅⊤, N'⁆) k N
#align lie_submodule.lcs_succ LieSubmodule.lcs_succ
@[simp]
lemma lcs_sup {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M} {k : ℕ} :
(N₁ ⊔ N₂).lcs k = N₁.lcs k ⊔ N₂.lcs k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp only [LieSubmodule.lcs_succ, ih, LieSubmodule.lie_sup]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable (R L M)
/-- The lower central series of Lie submodules of a Lie module. -/
def lowerCentralSeries : LieSubmodule R L M :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs k
#align lie_module.lower_central_series LieModule.lowerCentralSeries
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries R L M 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align lie_module.lower_central_series_zero LieModule.lowerCentralSeries_zero
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ :
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), lowerCentralSeries R L M k⁆ :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs_succ k
#align lie_module.lower_central_series_succ LieModule.lowerCentralSeries_succ
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
open LieModule
theorem lcs_le_self : N.lcs k ≤ N := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp only [lcs_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right _ _ ⊤ ih).trans (N.lie_le_right ⊤)
#align lie_submodule.lcs_le_self LieSubmodule.lcs_le_self
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap : lowerCentralSeries R L N k = (N.lcs k).comap N.incl := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp only [lcs_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ] at ih ⊢
have : N.lcs k ≤ N.incl.range := by
rw [N.range_incl]
apply lcs_le_self
rw [ih, LieSubmodule.comap_bracket_eq _ _ N.incl N.ker_incl this]
#align lie_submodule.lower_central_series_eq_lcs_comap LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap
theorem lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs : (lowerCentralSeries R L N k).map N.incl = N.lcs k := by
rw [lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.map_comap_incl, inf_eq_right]
apply lcs_le_self
#align lie_submodule.lower_central_series_map_eq_lcs LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable {M₂ : Type w₁} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂] [LieModule R L M₂]
variable (R L M)
theorem antitone_lowerCentralSeries : Antitone <| lowerCentralSeries R L M := by
intro l k
induction' k with k ih generalizing l <;> intro h
· exact (Nat.le_zero.mp h).symm ▸ le_rfl
· rcases Nat.of_le_succ h with (hk | hk)
· rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right _ _ ⊤ (ih hk)).trans (LieSubmodule.lie_le_right _ _)
· exact hk.symm ▸ le_rfl
#align lie_module.antitone_lower_central_series LieModule.antitone_lowerCentralSeries
theorem eventually_iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq [IsArtinian R M] :
∀ᶠ l in Filter.atTop, ⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = lowerCentralSeries R L M l := by
have h_wf : WellFounded ((· > ·) : (LieSubmodule R L M)ᵒᵈ → (LieSubmodule R L M)ᵒᵈ → Prop) :=
LieSubmodule.wellFounded_of_isArtinian R L M
obtain ⟨n, hn : ∀ m, n ≤ m → lowerCentralSeries R L M n = lowerCentralSeries R L M m⟩ :=
WellFounded.monotone_chain_condition.mp h_wf ⟨_, antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M⟩
refine Filter.eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨n, fun l hl ↦ le_antisymm (iInf_le _ _) (le_iInf fun m ↦ ?_)⟩
rcases le_or_lt l m with h | h
· rw [← hn _ hl, ← hn _ (hl.trans h)]
· exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (le_of_lt h)
theorem trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot : IsTrivial L M ↔ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 = ⊥ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· erw [eq_bot_iff, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨x, n, hn⟩; rw [← hn, h.trivial]; simp
· rw [LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff] at h; apply IsTrivial.mk; intro x m; apply h
apply LieSubmodule.subset_lieSpan
-- Porting note: was `use x, m; rfl`
simp only [LieSubmodule.top_coe, Subtype.exists, LieSubmodule.mem_top, exists_prop, true_and,
Set.mem_setOf]
exact ⟨x, m, rfl⟩
#align lie_module.trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot LieModule.trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries (x : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x)^[k] m ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L M k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Function.iterate_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, LieSubmodule.mem_top]
· simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ',
toEnd_apply_apply]
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie _ _ (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ih
#align lie_module.iterate_to_endomorphism_mem_lower_central_series LieModule.iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ (x y : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y)^[k] m ∈
lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
have hk : 2 * k.succ = (2 * k + 1) + 1 := rfl
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ', hk,
toEnd_apply_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, toEnd_apply_apply]
refine LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie _ _ (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ?_
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie _ _ (LieSubmodule.mem_top y) ih
variable {R L M}
theorem map_lowerCentralSeries_le (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, lowerCentralSeries_zero, le_top]
· simp only [LieModule.lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right _ _ ⊤ ih
#align lie_module.map_lower_central_series_le LieModule.map_lowerCentralSeries_le
lemma map_lowerCentralSeries_eq {f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f = lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
apply le_antisymm (map_lowerCentralSeries_le k f)
induction' k with k ih
· rwa [lowerCentralSeries_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, top_le_iff, f.map_top, f.range_eq_top]
· simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
apply LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right
assumption
variable (R L M)
open LieAlgebra
theorem derivedSeries_le_lowerCentralSeries (k : ℕ) :
derivedSeries R L k ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L L k := by
induction' k with k h
· rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero]
· have h' : derivedSeries R L k ≤ ⊤ := by simp only [le_top]
rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie _ _ _ _ h' h
#align lie_module.derived_series_le_lower_central_series LieModule.derivedSeries_le_lowerCentralSeries
/-- A Lie module is nilpotent if its lower central series reaches 0 (in a finite number of
steps). -/
class IsNilpotent : Prop where
nilpotent : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥
#align lie_module.is_nilpotent LieModule.IsNilpotent
theorem exists_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent R L M] :
∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
IsNilpotent.nilpotent
@[simp] lemma iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent R L M] :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent R L M
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact iInf_le _ _
/-- See also `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_ucs_eq_top`. -/
theorem isNilpotent_iff : IsNilpotent R L M ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.nilpotent, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align lie_module.is_nilpotent_iff LieModule.isNilpotent_iff
variable {R L M}
theorem _root_.LieSubmodule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_lcs_eq_bot (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
LieModule.IsNilpotent R L N ↔ ∃ k, N.lcs k = ⊥ := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff]
refine exists_congr fun k => ?_
rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap k, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot,
inf_eq_right.mpr (N.lcs_le_self k)]
#align lie_submodule.is_nilpotent_iff_exists_lcs_eq_bot LieSubmodule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_lcs_eq_bot
variable (R L M)
instance (priority := 100) trivialIsNilpotent [IsTrivial L M] : IsNilpotent R L M :=
⟨by use 1; change ⁅⊤, ⊤⁆ = ⊥; simp⟩
#align lie_module.trivial_is_nilpotent LieModule.trivialIsNilpotent
theorem exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero [hM : IsNilpotent R L M] :
∃ k : ℕ, ∀ x : L, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := hM
use k
intro x; ext m
rw [LinearMap.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← @LieSubmodule.mem_bot R L M, ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries R L M x m k
#align lie_module.nilpotent_endo_of_nilpotent_module LieModule.exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent R L M] (x : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x) := by
change ∃ k, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0
have := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
tauto
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent₂ [IsNilpotent R L M] (x y : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y) := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := exists_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent R L M
replace hM : lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hM]; exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (by omega)
use k
ext m
rw [LinearMap.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← LieSubmodule.mem_bot (R := R) (L := L), ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ R L M x y m k
@[simp] lemma maxGenEigenSpace_toEnd_eq_top [IsNilpotent R L M] (x : L) :
((toEnd R L M x).maxGenEigenspace 0) = ⊤ := by
ext m
simp only [Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace, zero_smul, sub_zero, Submodule.mem_top,
iff_true]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
exact ⟨k, by simp [hk x]⟩
/-- If the quotient of a Lie module `M` by a Lie submodule on which the Lie algebra acts trivially
is nilpotent then `M` is nilpotent.
This is essentially the Lie module equivalent of the fact that a central
extension of nilpotent Lie algebras is nilpotent. See `LieAlgebra.nilpotent_of_nilpotent_quotient`
below for the corresponding result for Lie algebras. -/
theorem nilpotentOfNilpotentQuotient {N : LieSubmodule R L M} (h₁ : N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M)
(h₂ : IsNilpotent R L (M ⧸ N)) : IsNilpotent R L M := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h₂
use k + 1
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
suffices lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N by
replace this := LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right _ _ ⊤ (le_trans this h₁)
rwa [ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot, le_bot_iff] at this
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, ← le_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact map_lowerCentralSeries_le k (LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk' N)
#align lie_module.nilpotent_of_nilpotent_quotient LieModule.nilpotentOfNilpotentQuotient
theorem isNilpotent_quotient_iff :
IsNilpotent R L (M ⧸ N) ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
rw [LieModule.isNilpotent_iff]
refine exists_congr fun k ↦ ?_
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, map_lowerCentralSeries_eq k
(LieSubmodule.Quotient.surjective_mk' N)]
theorem iInf_lcs_le_of_isNilpotent_quot (h : IsNilpotent R L (M ⧸ N)) :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (isNilpotent_quotient_iff R L M N).mp h
exact iInf_le_of_le k hk
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie module `M` with lower central series `M = C₀ ≥ C₁ ≥ ⋯ ≥ Cₖ = ⊥`, this is
the natural number `k` (the number of inclusions).
For a non-nilpotent module, we use the junk value 0. -/
noncomputable def nilpotencyLength : ℕ :=
sInf {k | lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥}
#align lie_module.nilpotency_length LieModule.nilpotencyLength
@[simp]
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff [IsNilpotent R L M] :
nilpotencyLength R L M = 0 ↔ Subsingleton M := by
let s := {k | lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥}
have hs : s.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (by infer_instance : IsNilpotent R L M)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩
change sInf s = 0 ↔ _
rw [← LieSubmodule.subsingleton_iff R L M, ← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ←
lowerCentralSeries_zero, @eq_comm (LieSubmodule R L M)]
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ Nat.sInf_mem hs, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [Nat.sInf_eq_zero]
exact Or.inl h
#align lie_module.nilpotency_length_eq_zero_iff LieModule.nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff (k : ℕ) :
nilpotencyLength R L M = k + 1 ↔
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⊥ ∧ lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≠ ⊥ := by
let s := {k | lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥}
change sInf s = k + 1 ↔ k + 1 ∈ s ∧ k ∉ s
have hs : ∀ k₁ k₂, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s := by
rintro k₁ k₂ h₁₂ (h₁ : lowerCentralSeries R L M k₁ = ⊥)
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (h₁ ▸ antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M h₁₂)
exact Nat.sInf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff hs k
#align lie_module.nilpotency_length_eq_succ_iff LieModule.nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff
@[simp]
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_one_iff [Nontrivial M] :
nilpotencyLength R L M = 1 ↔ IsTrivial L M := by
rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff, ← trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot]
simp
theorem isTrivial_of_nilpotencyLength_le_one [IsNilpotent R L M] (h : nilpotencyLength R L M ≤ 1) :
IsTrivial L M := by
nontriviality M
cases' Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.mp h with h h
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff] at h; infer_instance
· rwa [nilpotencyLength_eq_one_iff] at h
/-- Given a non-trivial nilpotent Lie module `M` with lower central series
`M = C₀ ≥ C₁ ≥ ⋯ ≥ Cₖ = ⊥`, this is the `k-1`th term in the lower central series (the last
non-trivial term).
For a trivial or non-nilpotent module, this is the bottom submodule, `⊥`. -/
noncomputable def lowerCentralSeriesLast : LieSubmodule R L M :=
match nilpotencyLength R L M with
| 0 => ⊥
| k + 1 => lowerCentralSeries R L M k
#align lie_module.lower_central_series_last LieModule.lowerCentralSeriesLast
theorem lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv :
lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M := by
rw [lowerCentralSeriesLast]
cases' h : nilpotencyLength R L M with k
· exact bot_le
· rw [le_max_triv_iff_bracket_eq_bot]
rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff, lowerCentralSeries_succ] at h
exact h.1
#align lie_module.lower_central_series_last_le_max_triv LieModule.lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv
theorem nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast [Nontrivial M] [IsNilpotent R L M] :
Nontrivial (lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M) := by
rw [LieSubmodule.nontrivial_iff_ne_bot, lowerCentralSeriesLast]
cases h : nilpotencyLength R L M
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton] at h
contradiction
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff] at h
exact h.2
#align lie_module.nontrivial_lower_central_series_last LieModule.nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast
theorem lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_of_not_isTrivial [IsNilpotent R L M] (h : ¬ IsTrivial L M) :
lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 := by
rw [lowerCentralSeriesLast]
replace h : 1 < nilpotencyLength R L M := by
by_contra contra
have := isTrivial_of_nilpotencyLength_le_one R L M (not_lt.mp contra)
contradiction
cases' hk : nilpotencyLength R L M with k <;> rw [hk] at h
· contradiction
· exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries _ _ _ (Nat.lt_succ.mp h)
/-- For a nilpotent Lie module `M` of a Lie algebra `L`, the first term in the lower central series
of `M` contains a non-zero element on which `L` acts trivially unless the entire action is trivial.
Taking `M = L`, this provides a useful characterisation of Abelian-ness for nilpotent Lie
algebras. -/
lemma disjoint_lowerCentralSeries_maxTrivSubmodule_iff [IsNilpotent R L M] :
Disjoint (lowerCentralSeries R L M 1) (maxTrivSubmodule R L M) ↔ IsTrivial L M := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simp⟩
nontriviality M
by_contra contra
have : lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 ⊓ maxTrivSubmodule R L M :=
le_inf_iff.mpr ⟨lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_of_not_isTrivial R L M contra,
lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv R L M⟩
suffices ¬ Nontrivial (lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M) by
exact this (nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M)
rw [h.eq_bot, le_bot_iff] at this
exact this ▸ not_nontrivial _
theorem nontrivial_max_triv_of_isNilpotent [Nontrivial M] [IsNilpotent R L M] :
Nontrivial (maxTrivSubmodule R L M) :=
Set.nontrivial_mono (lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv R L M)
(nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M)
#align lie_module.nontrivial_max_triv_of_is_nilpotent LieModule.nontrivial_max_triv_of_isNilpotent
@[simp]
theorem coe_lcs_range_toEnd_eq (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R (toEnd R L M).range M k : Submodule R M) =
lowerCentralSeries R L M k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', ←
(lowerCentralSeries R (toEnd R L M).range M k).mem_coeSubmodule, ih]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨-, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩, -, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, LieSubmodule.mem_top _, n, hn, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, -, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact
⟨⟨toEnd R L M x, LieHom.mem_range_self _ x⟩, LieSubmodule.mem_top _, n, hn, rfl⟩
#align lie_module.coe_lcs_range_to_endomorphism_eq LieModule.coe_lcs_range_toEnd_eq
@[simp]
theorem isNilpotent_range_toEnd_iff :
IsNilpotent R (toEnd R L M).range M ↔ IsNilpotent R L M := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ <;> use k <;>
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff] at hk ⊢ <;>
simpa using hk
#align lie_module.is_nilpotent_range_to_endomorphism_iff LieModule.isNilpotent_range_toEnd_iff
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M}
/-- The upper (aka ascending) central series.
See also `LieSubmodule.lcs`. -/
def ucs (k : ℕ) : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
normalizer^[k]
#align lie_submodule.ucs LieSubmodule.ucs
@[simp]
theorem ucs_zero : N.ucs 0 = N :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.ucs_zero LieSubmodule.ucs_zero
@[simp]
theorem ucs_succ (k : ℕ) : N.ucs (k + 1) = (N.ucs k).normalizer :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' normalizer k N
#align lie_submodule.ucs_succ LieSubmodule.ucs_succ
theorem ucs_add (k l : ℕ) : N.ucs (k + l) = (N.ucs l).ucs k :=
Function.iterate_add_apply normalizer k l N
#align lie_submodule.ucs_add LieSubmodule.ucs_add
@[mono]
theorem ucs_mono (k : ℕ) (h : N₁ ≤ N₂) : N₁.ucs k ≤ N₂.ucs k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simpa
simp only [ucs_succ]
-- Porting note: `mono` makes no progress
apply monotone_normalizer ih
#align lie_submodule.ucs_mono LieSubmodule.ucs_mono
theorem ucs_eq_self_of_normalizer_eq_self (h : N₁.normalizer = N₁) (k : ℕ) : N₁.ucs k = N₁ := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· rwa [ucs_succ, ih]
#align lie_submodule.ucs_eq_self_of_normalizer_eq_self LieSubmodule.ucs_eq_self_of_normalizer_eq_self
/-- If a Lie module `M` contains a self-normalizing Lie submodule `N`, then all terms of the upper
central series of `M` are contained in `N`.
An important instance of this situation arises from a Cartan subalgebra `H ⊆ L` with the roles of
`L`, `M`, `N` played by `H`, `L`, `H`, respectively. -/
theorem ucs_le_of_normalizer_eq_self (h : N₁.normalizer = N₁) (k : ℕ) :
(⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).ucs k ≤ N₁ := by
rw [← ucs_eq_self_of_normalizer_eq_self h k]
mono
simp
#align lie_submodule.ucs_le_of_normalizer_eq_self LieSubmodule.ucs_le_of_normalizer_eq_self
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Nilpotent.lean | 511 | 514 | theorem lcs_add_le_iff (l k : ℕ) : N₁.lcs (l + k) ≤ N₂ ↔ N₁.lcs l ≤ N₂.ucs k := by |
induction' k with k ih generalizing l
· simp
rw [(by abel : l + (k + 1) = l + 1 + k), ih, ucs_succ, lcs_succ, top_lie_le_iff_le_normalizer]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
#align_import algebra.homology.image_to_kernel from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"618ea3d5c99240cd7000d8376924906a148bf9ff"
/-!
# Image-to-kernel comparison maps
Whenever `f : A ⟶ B` and `g : B ⟶ C` satisfy `w : f ≫ g = 0`,
we have `image_le_kernel f g w : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g`
(assuming the appropriate images and kernels exist).
`imageToKernel f g w` is the corresponding morphism between objects in `C`.
We define `homology' f g w` of such a pair as the cokernel of `imageToKernel f g w`.
Note: As part of the transition to the new homology API, `homology` is temporarily
renamed `homology'`. It is planned that this definition shall be removed and replaced by
`ShortComplex.homology`.
-/
universe v u w
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g]
theorem image_le_kernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g :=
imageSubobject_le_mk _ _ (kernel.lift _ _ w) (by simp)
#align image_le_kernel image_le_kernel
/-- The canonical morphism `imageSubobject f ⟶ kernelSubobject g` when `f ≫ g = 0`.
-/
def imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : (imageSubobject f : V) ⟶ (kernelSubobject g : V) :=
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (image_le_kernel _ _ w)
#align image_to_kernel imageToKernel
instance (w : f ≫ g = 0) : Mono (imageToKernel f g w) := by
dsimp only [imageToKernel]
infer_instance
/-- Prefer `imageToKernel`. -/
@[simp]
theorem subobject_ofLE_as_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) (h) :
Subobject.ofLE (imageSubobject f) (kernelSubobject g) h = imageToKernel f g w :=
rfl
#align subobject_of_le_as_image_to_kernel subobject_ofLE_as_imageToKernel
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
-- Porting note: removed elementwise attribute which does not seem to be helpful here
-- a more suitable lemma is added below
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageToKernel_arrow (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f g w ≫ (kernelSubobject g).arrow = (imageSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [imageToKernel]
#align image_to_kernel_arrow imageToKernel_arrow
@[simp]
lemma imageToKernel_arrow_apply [ConcreteCategory V] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(x : (forget V).obj (Subobject.underlying.obj (imageSubobject f))) :
(kernelSubobject g).arrow (imageToKernel f g w x) =
(imageSubobject f).arrow x := by
rw [← comp_apply, imageToKernel_arrow]
-- This is less useful as a `simp` lemma than it initially appears,
-- as it "loses" the information the morphism factors through the image.
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
factorThruImageSubobject f ≫ imageToKernel f g w = factorThruKernelSubobject g f w := by
ext
simp
#align factor_thru_image_subobject_comp_image_to_kernel factorThruImageSubobject_comp_imageToKernel
end
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C)
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_zero_left [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] {w} :
imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g w = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_zero_left imageToKernel_zero_left
theorem imageToKernel_zero_right [HasImages V] {w} :
imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) w =
(imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ inv (kernelSubobject (0 : B ⟶ C)).arrow := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_zero_right imageToKernel_zero_right
section
variable [HasKernels V] [HasImages V]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_right {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) (by simp [reassoc_of% w]) =
imageToKernel f g w ≫ Subobject.ofLE _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_le g h) := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_comp_right imageToKernel_comp_right
theorem imageToKernel_comp_left {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g (by simp [w]) =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫ imageToKernel f g w := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_comp_left imageToKernel_comp_left
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_mono {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) [Mono h] (w) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) w =
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_mono h).mp (by simpa using w : (f ≫ g) ≫ h = 0 ≫ h)) ≫
(Subobject.isoOfEq _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_mono g h)).inv := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_comp_mono imageToKernel_comp_mono
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_epi_comp {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) [Epi h] (w) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g w =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_epi h).mp (by simpa using w : h ≫ f ≫ g = h ≫ 0)) := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_epi_comp imageToKernel_epi_comp
end
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_hom_inv_comp [HasEqualizers V] [HasImages V] {Z : V} {i : B ≅ Z} (w) :
imageToKernel (f ≫ i.hom) (i.inv ≫ g) w =
(imageSubobjectCompIso _ _).hom ≫
imageToKernel f g (by simpa using w) ≫ (kernelSubobjectIsoComp i.inv g).inv := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_comp_hom_inv_comp imageToKernel_comp_hom_inv_comp
open ZeroObject
/-- `imageToKernel` for `A --0--> B --g--> C`, where `g` is a mono is itself an epi
(i.e. the sequence is exact at `B`).
-/
instance imageToKernel_epi_of_zero_of_mono [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] [Mono g] :
Epi (imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g (by simp)) :=
epi_of_target_iso_zero _ (kernelSubobjectIso g ≪≫ kernel.ofMono g)
#align image_to_kernel_epi_of_zero_of_mono imageToKernel_epi_of_zero_of_mono
/-- `imageToKernel` for `A --f--> B --0--> C`, where `g` is an epi is itself an epi
(i.e. the sequence is exact at `B`).
-/
instance imageToKernel_epi_of_epi_of_zero [HasImages V] [Epi f] :
Epi (imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) (by simp)) := by
simp only [imageToKernel_zero_right]
haveI := epi_image_of_epi f
rw [← imageSubobject_arrow]
exact @epi_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ (epi_comp _ _) _ _
#align image_to_kernel_epi_of_epi_of_zero imageToKernel_epi_of_epi_of_zero
end
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g]
/-- The homology of a pair of morphisms `f : A ⟶ B` and `g : B ⟶ C` satisfying `f ≫ g = 0`
is the cokernel of the `imageToKernel` morphism for `f` and `g`.
-/
def homology' {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
[HasCokernel (imageToKernel f g w)] : V :=
cokernel (imageToKernel f g w)
#align homology homology'
section
variable (w : f ≫ g = 0) [HasCokernel (imageToKernel f g w)]
/-- The morphism from cycles to homology. -/
def homology'.π : (kernelSubobject g : V) ⟶ homology' f g w :=
cokernel.π _
#align homology.π homology'.π
@[simp]
theorem homology'.condition : imageToKernel f g w ≫ homology'.π f g w = 0 :=
cokernel.condition _
#align homology.condition homology'.condition
/-- To construct a map out of homology, it suffices to construct a map out of the cycles
which vanishes on boundaries.
-/
def homology'.desc {D : V} (k : (kernelSubobject g : V) ⟶ D) (p : imageToKernel f g w ≫ k = 0) :
homology' f g w ⟶ D :=
cokernel.desc _ k p
#align homology.desc homology'.desc
-- Porting note: removed elementwise attribute which does not seem to be helpful here
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem homology'.π_desc {D : V} (k : (kernelSubobject g : V) ⟶ D)
(p : imageToKernel f g w ≫ k = 0) : homology'.π f g w ≫ homology'.desc f g w k p = k := by
simp [homology'.π, homology'.desc]
#align homology.π_desc homology'.π_desc
/-- To check two morphisms out of `homology' f g w` are equal, it suffices to check on cycles. -/
@[ext]
theorem homology'.ext {D : V} {k k' : homology' f g w ⟶ D}
(p : homology'.π f g w ≫ k = homology'.π f g w ≫ k') : k = k' :=
coequalizer.hom_ext p
#align homology.ext homology'.ext
/-- The cokernel of the map `Im f ⟶ Ker 0` is isomorphic to the cokernel of `f.` -/
def homology'OfZeroRight [HasCokernel (imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) comp_zero)] [HasCokernel f]
[HasCokernel (image.ι f)] [Epi (factorThruImage f)] :
homology' f (0 : B ⟶ C) comp_zero ≅ cokernel f :=
(cokernel.mapIso _ _ (imageSubobjectIso _) ((kernelSubobjectIso 0).trans kernelZeroIsoSource)
(by simp)).trans
(cokernelImageι _)
#align homology_of_zero_right homology'OfZeroRight
/-- The kernel of the map `Im 0 ⟶ Ker f` is isomorphic to the kernel of `f.` -/
def homology'OfZeroLeft [HasZeroObject V] [HasKernels V] [HasImage (0 : A ⟶ B)]
[HasCokernel (imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g zero_comp)] :
homology' (0 : A ⟶ B) g zero_comp ≅ kernel g :=
((cokernelIsoOfEq <| imageToKernel_zero_left _).trans cokernelZeroIsoTarget).trans
(kernelSubobjectIso _)
#align homology_of_zero_left homology'OfZeroLeft
/-- `homology 0 0 _` is just the middle object. -/
@[simps]
def homology'ZeroZero [HasZeroObject V] [HasImage (0 : A ⟶ B)]
[HasCokernel (imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) (0 : B ⟶ C) zero_comp)] :
homology' (0 : A ⟶ B) (0 : B ⟶ C) zero_comp ≅ B where
hom := homology'.desc (0 : A ⟶ B) (0 : B ⟶ C) zero_comp (kernelSubobject 0).arrow (by simp)
inv := inv (kernelSubobject 0).arrow ≫ homology'.π _ _ _
#align homology_zero_zero homology'ZeroZero
end
section
variable {f g} (w : f ≫ g = 0) {A' B' C' : V} {f' : A' ⟶ B'} [HasImage f'] {g' : B' ⟶ C'}
[HasKernel g'] (w' : f' ≫ g' = 0) (α : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') [HasImageMap α]
(β : Arrow.mk g ⟶ Arrow.mk g') {A₁ B₁ C₁ : V} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B₁} [HasImage f₁] {g₁ : B₁ ⟶ C₁}
[HasKernel g₁] (w₁ : f₁ ≫ g₁ = 0) {A₂ B₂ C₂ : V} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B₂} [HasImage f₂] {g₂ : B₂ ⟶ C₂}
[HasKernel g₂] (w₂ : f₂ ≫ g₂ = 0) {A₃ B₃ C₃ : V} {f₃ : A₃ ⟶ B₃} [HasImage f₃] {g₃ : B₃ ⟶ C₃}
[HasKernel g₃] (w₃ : f₃ ≫ g₃ = 0) (α₁ : Arrow.mk f₁ ⟶ Arrow.mk f₂) [HasImageMap α₁]
(β₁ : Arrow.mk g₁ ⟶ Arrow.mk g₂) (α₂ : Arrow.mk f₂ ⟶ Arrow.mk f₃) [HasImageMap α₂]
(β₂ : Arrow.mk g₂ ⟶ Arrow.mk g₃)
/-- Given compatible commutative squares between
a pair `f g` and a pair `f' g'` satisfying `f ≫ g = 0` and `f' ≫ g' = 0`,
the `imageToKernel` morphisms intertwine the induced map on kernels and the induced map on images.
-/
@[reassoc]
theorem imageSubobjectMap_comp_imageToKernel (p : α.right = β.left) :
imageToKernel f g w ≫ kernelSubobjectMap β = imageSubobjectMap α ≫ imageToKernel f' g' w' := by
ext
simp [p]
#align image_subobject_map_comp_image_to_kernel imageSubobjectMap_comp_imageToKernel
variable [HasCokernel (imageToKernel f g w)] [HasCokernel (imageToKernel f' g' w')]
variable [HasCokernel (imageToKernel f₁ g₁ w₁)]
variable [HasCokernel (imageToKernel f₂ g₂ w₂)]
variable [HasCokernel (imageToKernel f₃ g₃ w₃)]
/-- Given compatible commutative squares between
a pair `f g` and a pair `f' g'` satisfying `f ≫ g = 0` and `f' ≫ g' = 0`,
we get a morphism on homology.
-/
def homology'.map (p : α.right = β.left) : homology' f g w ⟶ homology' f' g' w' :=
cokernel.desc _ (kernelSubobjectMap β ≫ cokernel.π _) <| by
rw [imageSubobjectMap_comp_imageToKernel_assoc w w' α β p]
simp only [cokernel.condition, comp_zero]
#align homology.map homology'.map
-- Porting note: removed elementwise attribute which does not seem to be helpful here,
-- the correct lemma is stated below
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem homology'.π_map (p : α.right = β.left) :
homology'.π f g w ≫ homology'.map w w' α β p =
kernelSubobjectMap β ≫ homology'.π f' g' w' := by
simp only [homology'.π, homology'.map, cokernel.π_desc]
#align homology.π_map homology'.π_map
section
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
@[simp]
lemma homology'.π_map_apply [ConcreteCategory.{w} V] (p : α.right = β.left)
(x : (forget V).obj (Subobject.underlying.obj (kernelSubobject g))) :
homology'.map w w' α β p (homology'.π f g w x) =
homology'.π f' g' w' (kernelSubobjectMap β x) := by
simp only [← comp_apply, homology'.π_map w w' α β p]
end
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem homology'.map_desc (p : α.right = β.left) {D : V} (k : (kernelSubobject g' : V) ⟶ D)
(z : imageToKernel f' g' w' ≫ k = 0) :
homology'.map w w' α β p ≫ homology'.desc f' g' w' k z =
homology'.desc f g w (kernelSubobjectMap β ≫ k)
(by simp only [imageSubobjectMap_comp_imageToKernel_assoc w w' α β p, z, comp_zero]) := by
ext
simp only [homology'.π_desc, homology'.π_map_assoc]
#align homology.map_desc homology'.map_desc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ImageToKernel.lean | 324 | 326 | theorem homology'.map_id : homology'.map w w (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) rfl = 𝟙 _ := by |
ext
simp only [homology'.π_map, kernelSubobjectMap_id, Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Exponential
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Chebyshev
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.chebyshev from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# Multiple angle formulas in terms of Chebyshev polynomials
This file gives the trigonometric characterizations of Chebyshev polynomials, for both the real
(`Real.cos`) and complex (`Complex.cos`) cosine.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
namespace Polynomial.Chebyshev
open Polynomial
variable {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
@[simp]
theorem aeval_T (x : A) (n : ℤ) : aeval x (T R n) = (T A n).eval x := by
rw [aeval_def, eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_T]
#align polynomial.chebyshev.aeval_T Polynomial.Chebyshev.aeval_T
@[simp]
theorem aeval_U (x : A) (n : ℤ) : aeval x (U R n) = (U A n).eval x := by
rw [aeval_def, eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_U]
#align polynomial.chebyshev.aeval_U Polynomial.Chebyshev.aeval_U
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eval_T (x : R) (n : ℤ) :
algebraMap R A ((T R n).eval x) = (T A n).eval (algebraMap R A x) := by
rw [← aeval_algebraMap_apply_eq_algebraMap_eval, aeval_T]
#align polynomial.chebyshev.algebra_map_eval_T Polynomial.Chebyshev.algebraMap_eval_T
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eval_U (x : R) (n : ℤ) :
algebraMap R A ((U R n).eval x) = (U A n).eval (algebraMap R A x) := by
rw [← aeval_algebraMap_apply_eq_algebraMap_eval, aeval_U]
#align polynomial.chebyshev.algebra_map_eval_U Polynomial.Chebyshev.algebraMap_eval_U
-- Porting note: added type ascriptions to the statement
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem complex_ofReal_eval_T : ∀ (x : ℝ) n, (((T ℝ n).eval x : ℝ) : ℂ) = (T ℂ n).eval (x : ℂ) :=
@algebraMap_eval_T ℝ ℂ _ _ _
#align polynomial.chebyshev.complex_of_real_eval_T Polynomial.Chebyshev.complex_ofReal_eval_T
-- Porting note: added type ascriptions to the statement
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem complex_ofReal_eval_U : ∀ (x : ℝ) n, (((U ℝ n).eval x : ℝ) : ℂ) = (U ℂ n).eval (x : ℂ) :=
@algebraMap_eval_U ℝ ℂ _ _ _
#align polynomial.chebyshev.complex_of_real_eval_U Polynomial.Chebyshev.complex_ofReal_eval_U
/-! ### Complex versions -/
section Complex
open Complex
variable (θ : ℂ)
/-- The `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind evaluates on `cos θ` to the
value `cos (n * θ)`. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Chebyshev.lean | 73 | 86 | theorem T_complex_cos (n : ℤ) : (T ℂ n).eval (cos θ) = cos (n * θ) := by |
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [T_add_two, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_X, eval_ofNat, ih1, ih2, sub_eq_iff_eq_add,
cos_add_cos]
push_cast
ring_nf
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [T_sub_one, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_X, eval_ofNat, ih1, ih2, sub_eq_iff_eq_add',
cos_add_cos]
push_cast
ring_nf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
#align real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
#align real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow Real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
#align real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul Real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
#align real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
#align real.rpow_add Real.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
#align real.rpow_add' Real.rpow_add'
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
#align real.rpow_add_of_nonneg Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
#align real.le_rpow_add Real.le_rpow_add
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
#align real.rpow_sum_of_pos Real.rpow_sum_of_pos
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
#align real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg Real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg Real.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub Real.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub' Real.rpow_sub'
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
#align complex.of_real_cpow Complex.ofReal_cpow
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, abs.map_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg,
arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx), ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
#align complex.of_real_cpow_of_nonpos Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(abs x ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [abs.pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = (abs x) ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = (abs x) ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem abs_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, abs_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (abs.pos hz)]
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero Complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero
theorem abs_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact abs_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [map_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, map_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_imp Complex.abs_cpow_of_imp
theorem abs_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : abs (z ^ w) ≤ abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (abs_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align complex.abs_cpow_le Complex.abs_cpow_le
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
#align complex.abs_cpow_real Complex.abs_cpow_real
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : abs (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← abs_cpow_real]; simp [-abs_cpow_real]
#align complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat Complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℂ) : abs (x ^ y) = x ^ y.re := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne'), arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le,
zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, div_one, abs_of_nonneg hx.le]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y : ℂ} (hy : re y ≠ 0) :
abs (x ^ y) = x ^ re y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp [*, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg, _root_.abs_of_nonneg]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_re_ne_zero (n : ℕ) {s : ℂ} (hs : s.re ≠ 0) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [norm_eq_abs, ← ofReal_natCast, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg hs]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [norm_eq_abs, ← ofReal_natCast, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) : 0 < ‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ :=
(norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos hn _).symm ▸ Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _
theorem cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (z : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ (↑y * z) = (↑(x ^ y) : ℂ) ^ z := by
rw [cpow_mul, ofReal_cpow hx]
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, neg_lt_zero]; exact Real.pi_pos
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im]; exact Real.pi_pos.le
#align complex.cpow_mul_of_real_nonneg Complex.cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg
end Complex
/-! ### Positivity extension -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is positive (namely 1)
when the exponent is zero. The other cases are done in `evalRpow`. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (0 : ℝ)]
def evalRpowZero : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ (0 : ℝ)) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_zero_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is nonnegative when
the base is nonnegative and positive when the base is positive. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (_ : ℝ)]
def evalRpow : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ ($b : ℝ)) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa =>
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_pos_of_pos $pa $b))
| .nonnegative pa =>
pure (.nonnegative q(Real.rpow_nonneg $pa $b))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-!
## Further algebraic properties of `rpow`
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
rw [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_cpow (rpow_nonneg hx _),
Complex.ofReal_cpow hx, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.cpow_mul, Complex.ofReal_cpow hx] <;>
simp only [(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, (Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, Complex.ofReal_im,
neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
#align real.rpow_mul Real.rpow_mul
theorem rpow_add_int {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_def, rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_add,
Complex.cpow_add _ _ (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx), Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.cpow_intCast, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, mul_comm, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.rpow_add_int Real.rpow_add_int
theorem rpow_add_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_int hx y n
#align real.rpow_add_nat Real.rpow_add_nat
theorem rpow_sub_int {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_int hx y (-n)
#align real.rpow_sub_int Real.rpow_sub_int
theorem rpow_sub_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_sub_int hx y n
#align real.rpow_sub_nat Real.rpow_sub_nat
lemma rpow_add_int' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_add_nat' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_sub_int' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_sub_nat' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_natCast]
theorem rpow_add_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_nat hx y 1
#align real.rpow_add_one Real.rpow_add_one
theorem rpow_sub_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_nat hx y 1
#align real.rpow_sub_one Real.rpow_sub_one
lemma rpow_add_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_sub_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [← rpow_natCast]
simp only [Nat.cast_ofNat]
#align real.rpow_two Real.rpow_two
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹ by rwa [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_one] at H
simp only [rpow_intCast, zpow_one, zpow_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg_one Real.rpow_neg_one
theorem mul_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
iterate 2 rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg]; split_ifs with h_ifs <;> simp_all
· rw [log_mul ‹_› ‹_›, add_mul, exp_add, rpow_def_of_pos (hy.lt_of_ne' ‹_›)]
all_goals positivity
#align real.mul_rpow Real.mul_rpow
theorem inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm]
#align real.inv_rpow Real.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
#align real.div_rpow Real.div_rpow
theorem log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x ^ y) = y * log x := by
apply exp_injective
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y]
#align real.log_rpow Real.log_rpow
theorem mul_log_eq_log_iff {x y z : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hz : 0 < z) :
y * log x = log z ↔ x ^ y = z :=
⟨fun h ↦ log_injOn_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) hz <| log_rpow hx _ |>.trans h,
by rintro rfl; rw [log_rpow hx]⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
#align real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
#align real.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
/-! Note: lemmas about `(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r)` such as `Real.finset_prod_rpow` are proved
in `Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean` instead. -/
/-!
## Order and monotonicity
-/
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z := by
rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hx; cases' hx with hx hx
· rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)]
exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa [← hx] at hxy) _
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow Real.rpow_lt_rpow
theorem strictMonoOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
StrictMonoOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow ha hab hr
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁'); · rfl
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with (rfl | h₂'); · simp
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
#align real.rpow_le_rpow Real.rpow_le_rpow
theorem monotoneOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
MonotoneOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow ha hab hr
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_lt_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_pos.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans_le hxy
rw [← inv_le_inv, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_le_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_nonneg.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), fun h => rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_iff Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h ↦ rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx h hz.le,
fun h ↦ rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hy h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy hx hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hx _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff _ hy hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 621 | 623 | theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by |
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.BigOperators
#align_import data.matrix.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"eba5bb3155cab51d80af00e8d7d69fa271b1302b"
/-!
# Matrices
This file defines basic properties of matrices.
Matrices with rows indexed by `m`, columns indexed by `n`, and entries of type `α` are represented
with `Matrix m n α`. For the typical approach of counting rows and columns,
`Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α` can be used.
## Notation
The locale `Matrix` gives the following notation:
* `⬝ᵥ` for `Matrix.dotProduct`
* `*ᵥ` for `Matrix.mulVec`
* `ᵥ*` for `Matrix.vecMul`
* `ᵀ` for `Matrix.transpose`
* `ᴴ` for `Matrix.conjTranspose`
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
universe u u' v w
/-- `Matrix m n R` is the type of matrices with entries in `R`, whose rows are indexed by `m`
and whose columns are indexed by `n`. -/
def Matrix (m : Type u) (n : Type u') (α : Type v) : Type max u u' v :=
m → n → α
#align matrix Matrix
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
section Ext
variable {M N : Matrix m n α}
theorem ext_iff : (∀ i j, M i j = N i j) ↔ M = N :=
⟨fun h => funext fun i => funext <| h i, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align matrix.ext_iff Matrix.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext : (∀ i j, M i j = N i j) → M = N :=
ext_iff.mp
#align matrix.ext Matrix.ext
end Ext
/-- Cast a function into a matrix.
The two sides of the equivalence are definitionally equal types. We want to use an explicit cast
to distinguish the types because `Matrix` has different instances to pi types (such as `Pi.mul`,
which performs elementwise multiplication, vs `Matrix.mul`).
If you are defining a matrix, in terms of its entries, use `of (fun i j ↦ _)`. The
purpose of this approach is to ensure that terms of the form `(fun i j ↦ _) * (fun i j ↦ _)` do not
appear, as the type of `*` can be misleading.
Porting note: In Lean 3, it is also safe to use pattern matching in a definition as `| i j := _`,
which can only be unfolded when fully-applied. leanprover/lean4#2042 means this does not
(currently) work in Lean 4.
-/
def of : (m → n → α) ≃ Matrix m n α :=
Equiv.refl _
#align matrix.of Matrix.of
@[simp]
theorem of_apply (f : m → n → α) (i j) : of f i j = f i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.of_apply Matrix.of_apply
@[simp]
theorem of_symm_apply (f : Matrix m n α) (i j) : of.symm f i j = f i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.of_symm_apply Matrix.of_symm_apply
/-- `M.map f` is the matrix obtained by applying `f` to each entry of the matrix `M`.
This is available in bundled forms as:
* `AddMonoidHom.mapMatrix`
* `LinearMap.mapMatrix`
* `RingHom.mapMatrix`
* `AlgHom.mapMatrix`
* `Equiv.mapMatrix`
* `AddEquiv.mapMatrix`
* `LinearEquiv.mapMatrix`
* `RingEquiv.mapMatrix`
* `AlgEquiv.mapMatrix`
-/
def map (M : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) : Matrix m n β :=
of fun i j => f (M i j)
#align matrix.map Matrix.map
@[simp]
theorem map_apply {M : Matrix m n α} {f : α → β} {i : m} {j : n} : M.map f i j = f (M i j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.map_apply Matrix.map_apply
@[simp]
theorem map_id (M : Matrix m n α) : M.map id = M := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.map_id Matrix.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' (M : Matrix m n α) : M.map (·) = M := map_id M
@[simp]
theorem map_map {M : Matrix m n α} {β γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
(M.map f).map g = M.map (g ∘ f) := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.map_map Matrix.map_map
theorem map_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective fun M : Matrix m n α => M.map f := fun _ _ h =>
ext fun i j => hf <| ext_iff.mpr h i j
#align matrix.map_injective Matrix.map_injective
/-- The transpose of a matrix. -/
def transpose (M : Matrix m n α) : Matrix n m α :=
of fun x y => M y x
#align matrix.transpose Matrix.transpose
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `transpose`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem transpose_apply (M : Matrix m n α) (i j) : transpose M i j = M j i :=
rfl
#align matrix.transpose_apply Matrix.transpose_apply
@[inherit_doc]
scoped postfix:1024 "ᵀ" => Matrix.transpose
/-- The conjugate transpose of a matrix defined in term of `star`. -/
def conjTranspose [Star α] (M : Matrix m n α) : Matrix n m α :=
M.transpose.map star
#align matrix.conj_transpose Matrix.conjTranspose
@[inherit_doc]
scoped postfix:1024 "ᴴ" => Matrix.conjTranspose
instance inhabited [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Matrix m n α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Inhabited <| m → n → α
-- Porting note: new, Lean3 found this automatically
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
instance add [Add α] : Add (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.instAdd
instance addSemigroup [AddSemigroup α] : AddSemigroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.addSemigroup
instance addCommSemigroup [AddCommSemigroup α] : AddCommSemigroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.addCommSemigroup
instance zero [Zero α] : Zero (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.instZero
instance addZeroClass [AddZeroClass α] : AddZeroClass (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.addZeroClass
instance addMonoid [AddMonoid α] : AddMonoid (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance addCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid α] : AddCommMonoid (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance neg [Neg α] : Neg (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.instNeg
instance sub [Sub α] : Sub (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.instSub
instance addGroup [AddGroup α] : AddGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance addCommGroup [AddCommGroup α] : AddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance unique [Unique α] : Unique (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.unique
instance subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (Matrix m n α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Subsingleton <| m → n → α
instance nonempty [Nonempty m] [Nonempty n] [Nontrivial α] : Nontrivial (Matrix m n α) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance smul [SMul R α] : SMul R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.instSMul
instance smulCommClass [SMul R α] [SMul S α] [SMulCommClass R S α] :
SMulCommClass R S (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.smulCommClass
instance isScalarTower [SMul R S] [SMul R α] [SMul S α] [IsScalarTower R S α] :
IsScalarTower R S (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
instance isCentralScalar [SMul R α] [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ α] [IsCentralScalar R α] :
IsCentralScalar R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.isCentralScalar
instance mulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R α] : MulAction R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.mulAction _
instance distribMulAction [Monoid R] [AddMonoid α] [DistribMulAction R α] :
DistribMulAction R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.distribMulAction _
instance module [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Module R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
-- Porting note (#10756): added the following section with simp lemmas because `simp` fails
-- to apply the corresponding lemmas in the namespace `Pi`.
-- (e.g. `Pi.zero_apply` used on `OfNat.ofNat 0 i j`)
section
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply [Zero α] (i : m) (j : n) : (0 : Matrix m n α) i j = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply [Add α] (A B : Matrix m n α) (i : m) (j : n) :
(A + B) i j = (A i j) + (B i j) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul β α] (r : β) (A : Matrix m n α) (i : m) (j : n) :
(r • A) i j = r • (A i j) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply [Sub α] (A B : Matrix m n α) (i : m) (j : n) :
(A - B) i j = (A i j) - (B i j) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply [Neg α] (A : Matrix m n α) (i : m) (j : n) :
(-A) i j = -(A i j) := rfl
end
/-! simp-normal form pulls `of` to the outside. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_zero [Zero α] : of (0 : m → n → α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align matrix.of_zero Matrix.of_zero
@[simp]
theorem of_add_of [Add α] (f g : m → n → α) : of f + of g = of (f + g) :=
rfl
#align matrix.of_add_of Matrix.of_add_of
@[simp]
theorem of_sub_of [Sub α] (f g : m → n → α) : of f - of g = of (f - g) :=
rfl
#align matrix.of_sub_of Matrix.of_sub_of
@[simp]
theorem neg_of [Neg α] (f : m → n → α) : -of f = of (-f) :=
rfl
#align matrix.neg_of Matrix.neg_of
@[simp]
theorem smul_of [SMul R α] (r : R) (f : m → n → α) : r • of f = of (r • f) :=
rfl
#align matrix.smul_of Matrix.smul_of
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero [Zero α] [Zero β] (f : α → β) (h : f 0 = 0) :
(0 : Matrix m n α).map f = 0 := by
ext
simp [h]
#align matrix.map_zero Matrix.map_zero
protected theorem map_add [Add α] [Add β] (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f (a₁ + a₂) = f a₁ + f a₂)
(M N : Matrix m n α) : (M + N).map f = M.map f + N.map f :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _ _
#align matrix.map_add Matrix.map_add
protected theorem map_sub [Sub α] [Sub β] (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f (a₁ - a₂) = f a₁ - f a₂)
(M N : Matrix m n α) : (M - N).map f = M.map f - N.map f :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _ _
#align matrix.map_sub Matrix.map_sub
theorem map_smul [SMul R α] [SMul R β] (f : α → β) (r : R) (hf : ∀ a, f (r • a) = r • f a)
(M : Matrix m n α) : (r • M).map f = r • M.map f :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _
#align matrix.map_smul Matrix.map_smul
/-- The scalar action via `Mul.toSMul` is transformed by the same map as the elements
of the matrix, when `f` preserves multiplication. -/
theorem map_smul' [Mul α] [Mul β] (f : α → β) (r : α) (A : Matrix n n α)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f (a₁ * a₂) = f a₁ * f a₂) : (r • A).map f = f r • A.map f :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _ _
#align matrix.map_smul' Matrix.map_smul'
/-- The scalar action via `mul.toOppositeSMul` is transformed by the same map as the
elements of the matrix, when `f` preserves multiplication. -/
theorem map_op_smul' [Mul α] [Mul β] (f : α → β) (r : α) (A : Matrix n n α)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f (a₁ * a₂) = f a₁ * f a₂) :
(MulOpposite.op r • A).map f = MulOpposite.op (f r) • A.map f :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _ _
#align matrix.map_op_smul' Matrix.map_op_smul'
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.matrix [SMul R S] {k : R} (hk : IsSMulRegular S k) :
IsSMulRegular (Matrix m n S) k :=
IsSMulRegular.pi fun _ => IsSMulRegular.pi fun _ => hk
#align is_smul_regular.matrix IsSMulRegular.matrix
theorem _root_.IsLeftRegular.matrix [Mul α] {k : α} (hk : IsLeftRegular k) :
IsSMulRegular (Matrix m n α) k :=
hk.isSMulRegular.matrix
#align is_left_regular.matrix IsLeftRegular.matrix
instance subsingleton_of_empty_left [IsEmpty m] : Subsingleton (Matrix m n α) :=
⟨fun M N => by
ext i
exact isEmptyElim i⟩
#align matrix.subsingleton_of_empty_left Matrix.subsingleton_of_empty_left
instance subsingleton_of_empty_right [IsEmpty n] : Subsingleton (Matrix m n α) :=
⟨fun M N => by
ext i j
exact isEmptyElim j⟩
#align matrix.subsingleton_of_empty_right Matrix.subsingleton_of_empty_right
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
/-- `diagonal d` is the square matrix such that `(diagonal d) i i = d i` and `(diagonal d) i j = 0`
if `i ≠ j`.
Note that bundled versions exist as:
* `Matrix.diagonalAddMonoidHom`
* `Matrix.diagonalLinearMap`
* `Matrix.diagonalRingHom`
* `Matrix.diagonalAlgHom`
-/
def diagonal [Zero α] (d : n → α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i j => if i = j then d i else 0
#align matrix.diagonal Matrix.diagonal
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `diagonal`, see mathlib4#3024
theorem diagonal_apply [Zero α] (d : n → α) (i j) : diagonal d i j = if i = j then d i else 0 :=
rfl
#align matrix.diagonal_apply Matrix.diagonal_apply
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_apply_eq [Zero α] (d : n → α) (i : n) : (diagonal d) i i = d i := by
simp [diagonal]
#align matrix.diagonal_apply_eq Matrix.diagonal_apply_eq
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_apply_ne [Zero α] (d : n → α) {i j : n} (h : i ≠ j) : (diagonal d) i j = 0 := by
simp [diagonal, h]
#align matrix.diagonal_apply_ne Matrix.diagonal_apply_ne
theorem diagonal_apply_ne' [Zero α] (d : n → α) {i j : n} (h : j ≠ i) : (diagonal d) i j = 0 :=
diagonal_apply_ne d h.symm
#align matrix.diagonal_apply_ne' Matrix.diagonal_apply_ne'
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_eq_diagonal_iff [Zero α] {d₁ d₂ : n → α} :
diagonal d₁ = diagonal d₂ ↔ ∀ i, d₁ i = d₂ i :=
⟨fun h i => by simpa using congr_arg (fun m : Matrix n n α => m i i) h, fun h => by
rw [show d₁ = d₂ from funext h]⟩
#align matrix.diagonal_eq_diagonal_iff Matrix.diagonal_eq_diagonal_iff
theorem diagonal_injective [Zero α] : Function.Injective (diagonal : (n → α) → Matrix n n α) :=
fun d₁ d₂ h => funext fun i => by simpa using Matrix.ext_iff.mpr h i i
#align matrix.diagonal_injective Matrix.diagonal_injective
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_zero [Zero α] : (diagonal fun _ => 0 : Matrix n n α) = 0 := by
ext
simp [diagonal]
#align matrix.diagonal_zero Matrix.diagonal_zero
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_transpose [Zero α] (v : n → α) : (diagonal v)ᵀ = diagonal v := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j
· simp [h, transpose]
· simp [h, transpose, diagonal_apply_ne' _ h]
#align matrix.diagonal_transpose Matrix.diagonal_transpose
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_add [AddZeroClass α] (d₁ d₂ : n → α) :
diagonal d₁ + diagonal d₂ = diagonal fun i => d₁ i + d₂ i := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j <;>
simp [h]
#align matrix.diagonal_add Matrix.diagonal_add
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_smul [Zero α] [SMulZeroClass R α] (r : R) (d : n → α) :
diagonal (r • d) = r • diagonal d := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [h]
#align matrix.diagonal_smul Matrix.diagonal_smul
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_neg [NegZeroClass α] (d : n → α) :
-diagonal d = diagonal fun i => -d i := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j <;>
simp [h]
#align matrix.diagonal_neg Matrix.diagonal_neg
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid α] (d₁ d₂ : n → α) :
diagonal d₁ - diagonal d₂ = diagonal fun i => d₁ i - d₂ i := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j <;>
simp [h]
instance [Zero α] [NatCast α] : NatCast (Matrix n n α) where
natCast m := diagonal fun _ => m
@[norm_cast]
theorem diagonal_natCast [Zero α] [NatCast α] (m : ℕ) : diagonal (fun _ : n => (m : α)) = m := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem diagonal_natCast' [Zero α] [NatCast α] (m : ℕ) : diagonal ((m : n → α)) = m := rfl
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem diagonal_ofNat [Zero α] [NatCast α] (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
diagonal (fun _ : n => no_index (OfNat.ofNat m : α)) = OfNat.ofNat m := rfl
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem diagonal_ofNat' [Zero α] [NatCast α] (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
diagonal (no_index (OfNat.ofNat m : n → α)) = OfNat.ofNat m := rfl
instance [Zero α] [IntCast α] : IntCast (Matrix n n α) where
intCast m := diagonal fun _ => m
@[norm_cast]
theorem diagonal_intCast [Zero α] [IntCast α] (m : ℤ) : diagonal (fun _ : n => (m : α)) = m := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem diagonal_intCast' [Zero α] [IntCast α] (m : ℤ) : diagonal ((m : n → α)) = m := rfl
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
#align matrix.diagonal_add_monoid_hom Matrix.diagonalAddMonoidHom
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
#align matrix.diagonal_linear_map Matrix.diagonalLinearMap
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_map [Zero α] [Zero β] {f : α → β} (h : f 0 = 0) {d : n → α} :
(diagonal d).map f = diagonal fun m => f (d m) := by
ext
simp only [diagonal_apply, map_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp [h]
#align matrix.diagonal_map Matrix.diagonal_map
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_conjTranspose [AddMonoid α] [StarAddMonoid α] (v : n → α) :
(diagonal v)ᴴ = diagonal (star v) := by
rw [conjTranspose, diagonal_transpose, diagonal_map (star_zero _)]
rfl
#align matrix.diagonal_conj_transpose Matrix.diagonal_conjTranspose
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
instance one : One (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨diagonal fun _ => 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem diagonal_one : (diagonal fun _ => 1 : Matrix n n α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align matrix.diagonal_one Matrix.diagonal_one
theorem one_apply {i j} : (1 : Matrix n n α) i j = if i = j then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
#align matrix.one_apply Matrix.one_apply
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_eq (i) : (1 : Matrix n n α) i i = 1 :=
diagonal_apply_eq _ i
#align matrix.one_apply_eq Matrix.one_apply_eq
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_ne {i j} : i ≠ j → (1 : Matrix n n α) i j = 0 :=
diagonal_apply_ne _
#align matrix.one_apply_ne Matrix.one_apply_ne
theorem one_apply_ne' {i j} : j ≠ i → (1 : Matrix n n α) i j = 0 :=
diagonal_apply_ne' _
#align matrix.one_apply_ne' Matrix.one_apply_ne'
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 556 | 560 | theorem map_one [Zero β] [One β] (f : α → β) (h₀ : f 0 = 0) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) :
(1 : Matrix n n α).map f = (1 : Matrix n n β) := by |
ext
simp only [one_apply, map_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp [h₀, h₁]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.NNReal
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SumOverResidueClass
#align_import analysis.p_series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b9eaaa7686280fad8cce467f5c3c57ee6ce77f8"
/-!
# Convergence of `p`-series
In this file we prove that the series `∑' k in ℕ, 1 / k ^ p` converges if and only if `p > 1`.
The proof is based on the
[Cauchy condensation test](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_condensation_test): `∑ k, f k`
converges if and only if so does `∑ k, 2 ^ k f (2 ^ k)`. We prove this test in
`NNReal.summable_condensed_iff` and `summable_condensed_iff_of_nonneg`, then use it to prove
`summable_one_div_rpow`. After this transformation, a `p`-series turns into a geometric series.
## Tags
p-series, Cauchy condensation test
-/
/-!
### Schlömilch's generalization of the Cauchy condensation test
In this section we prove the Schlömilch's generalization of the Cauchy condensation test:
for a strictly increasing `u : ℕ → ℕ` with ratio of successive differences bounded and an
antitone `f : ℕ → ℝ≥0` or `f : ℕ → ℝ`, `∑ k, f k` converges if and only if
so does `∑ k, (u (k + 1) - u k) * f (u k)`. Instead of giving a monolithic proof, we split it
into a series of lemmas with explicit estimates of partial sums of each series in terms of the
partial sums of the other series.
-/
/--
A sequence `u` has the property that its ratio of successive differences is bounded
when there is a positive real number `C` such that, for all n ∈ ℕ,
(u (n + 2) - u (n + 1)) ≤ C * (u (n + 1) - u n)
-/
def SuccDiffBounded (C : ℕ) (u : ℕ → ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ n : ℕ, u (n + 2) - u (n + 1) ≤ C • (u (n + 1) - u n)
namespace Finset
variable {M : Type*} [OrderedAddCommMonoid M] {f : ℕ → M} {u : ℕ → ℕ}
theorem le_sum_schlomilch' (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (h_pos : ∀ n, 0 < u n)
(hu : Monotone u) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ Ico (u 0) (u n), f k) ≤ ∑ k ∈ range n, (u (k + 1) - u k) • f (u k) := by
induction' n with n ihn
· simp
suffices (∑ k ∈ Ico (u n) (u (n + 1)), f k) ≤ (u (n + 1) - u n) • f (u n) by
rw [sum_range_succ, ← sum_Ico_consecutive]
· exact add_le_add ihn this
exacts [hu n.zero_le, hu n.le_succ]
have : ∀ k ∈ Ico (u n) (u (n + 1)), f k ≤ f (u n) := fun k hk =>
hf (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (h_pos n)) (mem_Ico.mp hk).1
convert sum_le_sum this
simp [pow_succ, mul_two]
| Mathlib/Analysis/PSeries.lean | 64 | 68 | theorem le_sum_condensed' (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ Ico 1 (2 ^ n), f k) ≤ ∑ k ∈ range n, 2 ^ k • f (2 ^ k) := by |
convert le_sum_schlomilch' hf (fun n => pow_pos zero_lt_two n)
(fun m n hm => pow_le_pow_right one_le_two hm) n using 2
simp [pow_succ, mul_two, two_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Matthew Robert Ballard
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Digits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.MaxPowDiv
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import number_theory.padics.padic_val from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60fa54e778c9e85d930efae172435f42fb0d71f7"
/-!
# `p`-adic Valuation
This file defines the `p`-adic valuation on `ℕ`, `ℤ`, and `ℚ`.
The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` is the difference of the multiplicities of `p` in the numerator and
denominator of `q`. This function obeys the standard properties of a valuation, with the appropriate
assumptions on `p`. The `p`-adic valuations on `ℕ` and `ℤ` agree with that on `ℚ`.
The valuation induces a norm on `ℚ`. This norm is defined in padicNorm.lean.
## Notations
This file uses the local notation `/.` for `Rat.mk`.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
## Calculations with `p`-adic valuations
* `padicValNat_factorial`: Legendre's Theorem. The `p`-adic valuation of `n!` is the sum of the
quotients `n / p ^ i`. This sum is expressed over the finset `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound
greater than `log p n`. See `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_factorial` for the same result but stated in the
language of prime multiplicity.
* `sub_one_mul_padicValNat_factorial`: Legendre's Theorem. Taking (`p - 1`) times
the `p`-adic valuation of `n!` equals `n` minus the sum of base `p` digits of `n`.
* `padicValNat_choose`: Kummer's Theorem. The `p`-adic valuation of `n.choose k` is the number
of carries when `k` and `n - k` are added in base `p`. This sum is expressed over the finset
`Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than `log p n`. See `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_choose` for the
same result but stated in the language of prime multiplicity.
* `sub_one_mul_padicValNat_choose_eq_sub_sum_digits`: Kummer's Theorem. Taking (`p - 1`) times the
`p`-adic valuation of the binomial `n` over `k` equals the sum of the digits of `k` plus the sum of
the digits of `n - k` minus the sum of digits of `n`, all base `p`.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation
-/
universe u
open Nat
open Rat
open multiplicity
/-- For `p ≠ 1`, the `p`-adic valuation of a natural `n ≠ 0` is the largest natural number `k` such
that `p^k` divides `n`. If `n = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValNat p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValNat (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if h : p ≠ 1 ∧ 0 < n then (multiplicity p n).get (multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.2 h) else 0
#align padic_val_nat padicValNat
namespace padicValNat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
/-- `padicValNat p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValNat p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValNat]
#align padic_val_nat.zero padicValNat.zero
/-- `padicValNat p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValNat p 1 = 0 := by
unfold padicValNat
split_ifs
· simp
· rfl
#align padic_val_nat.one padicValNat.one
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValNat p p` is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValNat p p = 1 := by
have neq_one : ¬p = 1 ↔ True := iff_of_true hp.ne' trivial
have eq_zero_false : p = 0 ↔ False := iff_false_intro (zero_lt_one.trans hp).ne'
simp [padicValNat, neq_one, eq_zero_false]
#align padic_val_nat.self padicValNat.self
@[simp]
theorem eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : padicValNat p n = 0 ↔ p = 1 ∨ n = 0 ∨ ¬p ∣ n := by
simp only [padicValNat, dite_eq_right_iff, PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe, Nat.cast_zero,
multiplicity_eq_zero, and_imp, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ← or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align padic_val_nat.eq_zero_iff padicValNat.eq_zero_iff
theorem eq_zero_of_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (h : ¬p ∣ n) : padicValNat p n = 0 :=
eq_zero_iff.2 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr h
#align padic_val_nat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd
open Nat.maxPowDiv
theorem maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity {p n : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hn : 0 < n) :
p.maxPowDiv n = multiplicity p n := by
apply multiplicity.unique <| pow_dvd p n
intro h
apply Nat.not_lt.mpr <| le_of_dvd hp hn h
simp
theorem maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity_get {p n : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hn : 0 < n) (h : Finite p n) :
p.maxPowDiv n = (multiplicity p n).get h := by
rw [PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe.mpr]
apply maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity hp hn|>.symm
/-- Allows for more efficient code for `padicValNat` -/
@[csimp]
theorem padicValNat_eq_maxPowDiv : @padicValNat = @maxPowDiv := by
ext p n
by_cases h : 1 < p ∧ 0 < n
· dsimp [padicValNat]
rw [dif_pos ⟨Nat.ne_of_gt h.1,h.2⟩, maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity_get h.1 h.2]
· simp only [not_and_or,not_gt_eq,Nat.le_zero] at h
apply h.elim
· intro h
interval_cases p
· simp [Classical.em]
· dsimp [padicValNat, maxPowDiv]
rw [go, if_neg, dif_neg] <;> simp
· intro h
simp [h]
end padicValNat
/-- For `p ≠ 1`, the `p`-adic valuation of an integer `z ≠ 0` is the largest natural number `k` such
that `p^k` divides `z`. If `x = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValInt p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValInt (p : ℕ) (z : ℤ) : ℕ :=
padicValNat p z.natAbs
#align padic_val_int padicValInt
namespace padicValInt
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
theorem of_ne_one_ne_zero {z : ℤ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
padicValInt p z =
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) z).get
(by
apply multiplicity.finite_int_iff.2
simp [hp, hz]) := by
rw [padicValInt, padicValNat, dif_pos (And.intro hp (Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hz))]
simp only [multiplicity.Int.natAbs p z]
#align padic_val_int.of_ne_one_ne_zero padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero
/-- `padicValInt p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValInt p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.zero padicValInt.zero
/-- `padicValInt p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValInt p 1 = 0 := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.one padicValInt.one
/-- The `p`-adic value of a natural is its `p`-adic value as an integer. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_nat {n : ℕ} : padicValInt p n = padicValNat p n := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.of_nat padicValInt.of_nat
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValInt p p` is `1`. -/
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValInt p p = 1 := by simp [padicValNat.self hp]
#align padic_val_int.self padicValInt.self
theorem eq_zero_of_not_dvd {z : ℤ} (h : ¬(p : ℤ) ∣ z) : padicValInt p z = 0 := by
rw [padicValInt, padicValNat]
split_ifs <;> simp [multiplicity.Int.natAbs, multiplicity_eq_zero.2 h]
#align padic_val_int.eq_zero_of_not_dvd padicValInt.eq_zero_of_not_dvd
end padicValInt
/-- `padicValRat` defines the valuation of a rational `q` to be the valuation of `q.num` minus the
valuation of `q.den`. If `q = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValRat p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValRat (p : ℕ) (q : ℚ) : ℤ :=
padicValInt p q.num - padicValNat p q.den
#align padic_val_rat padicValRat
lemma padicValRat_def (p : ℕ) (q : ℚ) :
padicValRat p q = padicValInt p q.num - padicValNat p q.den :=
rfl
namespace padicValRat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
/-- `padicValRat p q` is symmetric in `q`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem neg (q : ℚ) : padicValRat p (-q) = padicValRat p q := by
simp [padicValRat, padicValInt]
#align padic_val_rat.neg padicValRat.neg
/-- `padicValRat p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValRat p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.zero padicValRat.zero
/-- `padicValRat p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValRat p 1 = 0 := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.one padicValRat.one
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is its `p`-adic_value as a rational. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_int {z : ℤ} : padicValRat p z = padicValInt p z := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.of_int padicValRat.of_int
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is the multiplicity of `p` in `z`. -/
theorem of_int_multiplicity {z : ℤ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (z : ℚ) = (multiplicity (p : ℤ) z).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp, hz⟩) := by
rw [of_int, padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero hp hz]
#align padic_val_rat.of_int_multiplicity padicValRat.of_int_multiplicity
theorem multiplicity_sub_multiplicity {q : ℚ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p q =
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) q.num).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp, Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hq⟩) -
(multiplicity p q.den).get
(by
rw [← finite_iff_dom, finite_nat_iff]
exact ⟨hp, q.pos⟩) := by
rw [padicValRat, padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero hp, padicValNat, dif_pos]
· exact ⟨hp, q.pos⟩
· exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hq
#align padic_val_rat.multiplicity_sub_multiplicity padicValRat.multiplicity_sub_multiplicity
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is its `p`-adic value as a rational. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_nat {n : ℕ} : padicValRat p n = padicValNat p n := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.of_nat padicValRat.of_nat
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValRat p p` is `1`. -/
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValRat p p = 1 := by simp [hp]
#align padic_val_rat.self padicValRat.self
end padicValRat
section padicValNat
variable {p : ℕ}
theorem zero_le_padicValRat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ padicValRat p n := by simp
#align zero_le_padic_val_rat_of_nat zero_le_padicValRat_of_nat
/-- `padicValRat` coincides with `padicValNat`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem padicValRat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : ↑(padicValNat p n) = padicValRat p n := by simp
#align padic_val_rat_of_nat padicValRat_of_nat
/-- A simplification of `padicValNat` when one input is prime, by analogy with
`padicValRat_def`. -/
theorem padicValNat_def [hp : Fact p.Prime] {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
padicValNat p n = (multiplicity p n).get (multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.2 ⟨hp.out.ne_one, hn⟩) :=
dif_pos ⟨hp.out.ne_one, hn⟩
#align padic_val_nat_def padicValNat_def
theorem padicValNat_def' {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hn : 0 < n) :
↑(padicValNat p n) = multiplicity p n := by simp [padicValNat, hp, hn]
#align padic_val_nat_def' padicValNat_def'
@[simp]
theorem padicValNat_self [Fact p.Prime] : padicValNat p p = 1 := by
rw [padicValNat_def (@Fact.out p.Prime).pos]
simp
#align padic_val_nat_self padicValNat_self
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicVal.lean | 293 | 296 | theorem one_le_padicValNat_of_dvd {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hn : 0 < n) (div : p ∣ n) :
1 ≤ padicValNat p n := by |
rwa [← PartENat.coe_le_coe, padicValNat_def' hp.out.ne_one hn, ← pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity,
pow_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Torsion
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
#align_import linear_algebra.dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a5f8186becdbc826190ced4312f8199f9db6a5"
/-!
# Conditions for rank to be finite
Also contains characterization for when rank equals zero or rank equals one.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v v' w
variable {R : Type u} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {ι : Type w}
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M₁]
attribute [local instance] nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set FiniteDimensional
theorem rank_le {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : Finset M, (LinearIndependent R fun i : s => (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
Module.rank R M ≤ n := by
rw [Module.rank_def]
apply ciSup_le'
rintro ⟨s, li⟩
exact linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded H _ li
#align rank_le rank_le
section RankZero
/-- See `rank_zero_iff` for a stronger version with `NoZeroSMulDivisor R M`. -/
lemma rank_eq_zero_iff :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ ∀ x : M, ∃ a : R, a ≠ 0 ∧ a • x = 0 := by
nontriviality R
constructor
· contrapose!
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
have : LinearIndependent R (fun _ : Unit ↦ x) :=
linearIndependent_iff.mpr (fun l hl ↦ Finsupp.unique_ext <| not_not.mp fun H ↦
hx _ H ((Finsupp.total_unique _ _ _).symm.trans hl))
simpa using this.cardinal_lift_le_rank
· intro h
rw [← le_zero_iff, Module.rank_def]
apply ciSup_le'
intro ⟨s, hs⟩
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff, ← not_nonempty_iff]
rintro ⟨i : s⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := h i
apply ha
simpa using DFunLike.congr_fun (linearIndependent_iff.mp hs (Finsupp.single i a) (by simpa)) i
variable [Nontrivial R]
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
theorem rank_zero_iff_forall_zero :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ ∀ x : M, x = 0 := by
simp_rw [rank_eq_zero_iff, smul_eq_zero, and_or_left, not_and_self_iff, false_or,
exists_and_right, and_iff_right (exists_ne (0 : R))]
#align rank_zero_iff_forall_zero rank_zero_iff_forall_zero
/-- See `rank_subsingleton` for the reason that `Nontrivial R` is needed.
Also see `rank_eq_zero_iff` for the version without `NoZeroSMulDivisor R M`. -/
theorem rank_zero_iff : Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ Subsingleton M :=
rank_zero_iff_forall_zero.trans (subsingleton_iff_forall_eq 0).symm
#align rank_zero_iff rank_zero_iff
theorem rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero : 0 < Module.rank R M ↔ ∃ x : M, x ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simpa using rank_zero_iff_forall_zero
#align rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero
theorem rank_pos_iff_nontrivial : 0 < Module.rank R M ↔ Nontrivial M :=
rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero.trans (nontrivial_iff_exists_ne 0).symm
#align rank_pos_iff_nontrivial rank_pos_iff_nontrivial
lemma rank_eq_zero_iff_isTorsion {R M} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ Module.IsTorsion R M := by
rw [Module.IsTorsion, rank_eq_zero_iff]
simp [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero]
theorem rank_pos [Nontrivial M] : 0 < Module.rank R M :=
rank_pos_iff_nontrivial.mpr ‹_›
#align rank_pos rank_pos
variable (R M)
/-- See `rank_subsingleton` that assumes `Subsingleton R` instead. -/
theorem rank_subsingleton' [Subsingleton M] : Module.rank R M = 0 :=
rank_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun _ ↦ ⟨1, one_ne_zero, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem rank_punit : Module.rank R PUnit = 0 := rank_subsingleton' _ _
#align rank_punit rank_punit
@[simp]
theorem rank_bot : Module.rank R (⊥ : Submodule R M) = 0 := rank_subsingleton' _ _
#align rank_bot rank_bot
variable {R M}
theorem exists_mem_ne_zero_of_rank_pos {s : Submodule R M} (h : 0 < Module.rank R s) :
∃ b : M, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot fun eq => by rw [eq, rank_bot] at h; exact lt_irrefl _ h
#align exists_mem_ne_zero_of_rank_pos exists_mem_ne_zero_of_rank_pos
end RankZero
section Finite
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_nat [Module.Free R M] {n : ℕ} (h : Module.rank R M = n) :
Module.Finite R M := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨⟨ι, b⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
have := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.mp <|
b.linearIndependent.cardinal_le_rank |>.trans_eq h |>.trans_lt <| nat_lt_aleph0 n
exact Module.Finite.of_basis b
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(h : Module.rank R M = 0) :
Module.Finite R M := by
nontriviality R
rw [rank_zero_iff] at h
infer_instance
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_one [Module.Free R M] (h : Module.rank R M = 1) :
Module.Finite R M :=
Module.finite_of_rank_eq_nat <| h.trans Nat.cast_one.symm
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite type. -/
theorem Basis.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : Nonempty (Fintype ι) := by
rwa [← Cardinal.lift_lt, ← b.mk_eq_rank, Cardinal.lift_aleph0, Cardinal.lift_lt_aleph0,
Cardinal.lt_aleph0_iff_fintype] at h
#align basis.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph_0 Basis.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite type. -/
noncomputable def Basis.fintypeIndexOfRankLtAleph0 {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : Fintype ι :=
Classical.choice (b.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 h)
#align basis.fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph_0 Basis.fintypeIndexOfRankLtAleph0
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite set. -/
theorem Basis.finite_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (b : Basis s R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : s.Finite :=
finite_def.2 (b.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 h)
#align basis.finite_index_of_rank_lt_aleph_0 Basis.finite_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0
namespace LinearIndependent
theorem cardinal_mk_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{ι : Type w} {b : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R b) : #ι ≤ finrank R M := by
rw [← lift_le.{max v w}]
simpa only [← finrank_eq_rank, lift_natCast, lift_le_nat_iff] using h.cardinal_lift_le_rank
#align finite_dimensional.cardinal_mk_le_finrank_of_linear_independent LinearIndependent.cardinal_mk_le_finrank
theorem fintype_card_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R b) :
Fintype.card ι ≤ finrank R M := by
simpa using h.cardinal_mk_le_finrank
#align finite_dimensional.fintype_card_le_finrank_of_linear_independent LinearIndependent.fintype_card_le_finrank
theorem finset_card_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{b : Finset M} (h : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : b → M)) :
b.card ≤ finrank R M := by
rw [← Fintype.card_coe]
exact h.fintype_card_le_finrank
#align finite_dimensional.finset_card_le_finrank_of_linear_independent LinearIndependent.finset_card_le_finrank
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Finite.lean | 186 | 192 | theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite {ι : Type w}
[Module.Finite R M] {v : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R v) : #ι < ℵ₀ := by |
apply Cardinal.lift_lt.1
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply h.cardinal_lift_le_rank
· rw [← finrank_eq_rank, Cardinal.lift_aleph0, Cardinal.lift_natCast]
apply Cardinal.nat_lt_aleph0
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OreLocalization.Basic
#align_import group_theory.monoid_localization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10ee941346c27bdb5e87bb3535100c0b1f08ac41"
/-!
# Localizations of commutative monoids
Localizing a commutative ring at one of its submonoids does not rely on the ring's addition, so
we can generalize localizations to commutative monoids.
We characterize the localization of a commutative monoid `M` at a submonoid `S` up to
isomorphism; that is, a commutative monoid `N` is the localization of `M` at `S` iff we can find a
monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` satisfying 3 properties:
1. For all `y ∈ S`, `f y` is a unit;
2. For all `z : N`, there exists `(x, y) : M × S` such that `z * f y = f x`;
3. For all `x, y : M` such that `f x = f y`, there exists `c ∈ S` such that `x * c = y * c`.
(The converse is a consequence of 1.)
Given such a localization map `f : M →* N`, we can define the surjection
`Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'` sending `(x, y) : M × S` to `f x * (f y)⁻¹`, and
`Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift`, the homomorphism from `N` induced by a homomorphism from `M` which
maps elements of `S` to invertible elements of the codomain. Similarly, given commutative monoids
`P, Q`, a submonoid `T` of `P` and a localization map for `T` from `P` to `Q`, then a homomorphism
`g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T` induces a homomorphism of localizations, `LocalizationMap.map`,
from `N` to `Q`. We treat the special case of localizing away from an element in the sections
`AwayMap` and `Away`.
We also define the quotient of `M × S` by the unique congruence relation (equivalence relation
preserving a binary operation) `r` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S`
satisfying '`∀ y ∈ S`, `(1, 1) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`', we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`
whenever `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r`. We show this relation is equivalent to the standard
localization relation.
This defines the localization as a quotient type, `Localization`, but the majority of
subsequent lemmas in the file are given in terms of localizations up to isomorphism, using maps
which satisfy the characteristic predicate.
The Grothendieck group construction corresponds to localizing at the top submonoid, namely making
every element invertible.
## Implementation notes
In maths it is natural to reason up to isomorphism, but in Lean we cannot naturally `rewrite` one
structure with an isomorphic one; one way around this is to isolate a predicate characterizing
a structure up to isomorphism, and reason about things that satisfy the predicate.
The infimum form of the localization congruence relation is chosen as 'canonical' here, since it
shortens some proofs.
To apply a localization map `f` as a function, we use `f.toMap`, as coercions don't work well for
this structure.
To reason about the localization as a quotient type, use `mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'` and associated
lemmas. These show the quotient map `mk : M → S → Localization S` equals the
surjection `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by the map
`Localization.monoidOf : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S (Localization S)` (where `of` establishes the
localization as a quotient type satisfies the characteristic predicate). The lemma
`mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'` hence gives you access to the results in the rest of the file, which are about
the `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by any localization map.
## TODO
* Show that the localization at the top monoid is a group.
* Generalise to (nonempty) subsemigroups.
* If we acquire more bundlings, we can make `Localization.mkOrderEmbedding` be an ordered monoid
embedding.
## Tags
localization, monoid localization, quotient monoid, congruence relation, characteristic predicate,
commutative monoid, grothendieck group
-/
open Function
namespace AddSubmonoid
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (S : AddSubmonoid M) (N : Type*) [AddCommMonoid N]
/-- The type of AddMonoid homomorphisms satisfying the characteristic predicate: if `f : M →+ N`
satisfies this predicate, then `N` is isomorphic to the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure LocalizationMap extends AddMonoidHom M N where
map_add_units' : ∀ y : S, IsAddUnit (toFun y)
surj' : ∀ z : N, ∃ x : M × S, z + toFun x.2 = toFun x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ x y, toFun x = toFun y → ∃ c : S, ↑c + x = ↑c + y
#align add_submonoid.localization_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: no docstrings for AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_add_units'
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.surj' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_eq
/-- The AddMonoidHom underlying a `LocalizationMap` of `AddCommMonoid`s. -/
add_decl_doc LocalizationMap.toAddMonoidHom
end AddSubmonoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (S : Submonoid M) (N : Type*) [CommMonoid N] {P : Type*}
[CommMonoid P]
namespace Submonoid
/-- The type of monoid homomorphisms satisfying the characteristic predicate: if `f : M →* N`
satisfies this predicate, then `N` is isomorphic to the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure LocalizationMap extends MonoidHom M N where
map_units' : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (toFun y)
surj' : ∀ z : N, ∃ x : M × S, z * toFun x.2 = toFun x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ x y, toFun x = toFun y → ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = c * y
#align submonoid.localization_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: no docstrings for Submonoid.LocalizationMap
attribute [nolint docBlame] Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_units' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.surj'
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_eq
attribute [to_additive] Submonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: this translation already exists
-- attribute [to_additive] Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMonoidHom
/-- The monoid hom underlying a `LocalizationMap`. -/
add_decl_doc LocalizationMap.toMonoidHom
end Submonoid
namespace Localization
-- Porting note: this does not work so it is done explicitly instead
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `Localization `AddLocalization
-- run_cmd Elab.Command.liftCoreM <| ToAdditive.insertTranslation `Localization `AddLocalization
/-- The congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a submonoid of `M`, whose
quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`, defined as the unique congruence relation on
`M × S` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S` where for all `y ∈ S`,
`(1, 1) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`, we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r` implies
`(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`. -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r
"The congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` an `AddCommMonoid` and `S` an `AddSubmonoid` of `M`,
whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`, defined as the unique congruence relation on
`M × S` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S` where for all `y ∈ S`,
`(0, 0) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`, we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r` implies
`(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`."]
def r (S : Submonoid M) : Con (M × S) :=
sInf { c | ∀ y : S, c 1 (y, y) }
#align localization.r Localization.r
#align add_localization.r AddLocalization.r
/-- An alternate form of the congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a
submonoid of `M`, whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r'
"An alternate form of the congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a
submonoid of `M`, whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`."]
def r' : Con (M × S) := by
-- note we multiply by `c` on the left so that we can later generalize to `•`
refine
{ r := fun a b : M × S ↦ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑b.2 * a.1) = c * (a.2 * b.1)
iseqv := ⟨fun a ↦ ⟨1, rfl⟩, fun ⟨c, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨c, hc.symm⟩, ?_⟩
mul' := ?_ }
· rintro a b c ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩
use t₂ * t₁ * b.2
simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul]
calc
(t₂ * t₁ * b.2 : M) * (c.2 * a.1) = t₂ * c.2 * (t₁ * (b.2 * a.1)) := by ac_rfl
_ = t₁ * a.2 * (t₂ * (c.2 * b.1)) := by rw [ht₁]; ac_rfl
_ = t₂ * t₁ * b.2 * (a.2 * c.1) := by rw [ht₂]; ac_rfl
· rintro a b c d ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩
use t₂ * t₁
calc
(t₂ * t₁ : M) * (b.2 * d.2 * (a.1 * c.1)) = t₂ * (d.2 * c.1) * (t₁ * (b.2 * a.1)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (t₂ * t₁ : M) * (a.2 * c.2 * (b.1 * d.1)) := by rw [ht₁, ht₂]; ac_rfl
#align localization.r' Localization.r'
#align add_localization.r' AddLocalization.r'
/-- The congruence relation used to localize a `CommMonoid` at a submonoid can be expressed
equivalently as an infimum (see `Localization.r`) or explicitly
(see `Localization.r'`). -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r_eq_r'
"The additive congruence relation used to localize an `AddCommMonoid` at a submonoid can be
expressed equivalently as an infimum (see `AddLocalization.r`) or explicitly
(see `AddLocalization.r'`)."]
theorem r_eq_r' : r S = r' S :=
le_antisymm (sInf_le fun _ ↦ ⟨1, by simp⟩) <|
le_sInf fun b H ⟨p, q⟩ ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ by
rw [← one_mul (p, q), ← one_mul (x, y)]
refine b.trans (b.mul (H (t * y)) (b.refl _)) ?_
convert b.symm (b.mul (H (t * q)) (b.refl (x, y))) using 1
dsimp only [Prod.mk_mul_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul] at ht ⊢
simp_rw [mul_assoc, ht, mul_comm y q]
#align localization.r_eq_r' Localization.r_eq_r'
#align add_localization.r_eq_r' AddLocalization.r_eq_r'
variable {S}
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r_iff_exists]
theorem r_iff_exists {x y : M × S} : r S x y ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑y.2 * x.1) = c * (x.2 * y.1) := by
rw [r_eq_r' S]; rfl
#align localization.r_iff_exists Localization.r_iff_exists
#align add_localization.r_iff_exists AddLocalization.r_iff_exists
end Localization
/-- The localization of a `CommMonoid` at one of its submonoids (as a quotient type). -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization
"The localization of an `AddCommMonoid` at one of its submonoids (as a quotient type)."]
def Localization := (Localization.r S).Quotient
#align localization Localization
#align add_localization AddLocalization
namespace Localization
@[to_additive]
instance inhabited : Inhabited (Localization S) := Con.Quotient.inhabited
#align localization.inhabited Localization.inhabited
#align add_localization.inhabited AddLocalization.inhabited
/-- Multiplication in a `Localization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ * ⟨c, d⟩ = ⟨a * c, b * d⟩`. -/
@[to_additive "Addition in an `AddLocalization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ + ⟨c, d⟩ = ⟨a + c, b + d⟩`.
Should not be confused with the ring localization counterpart `Localization.add`, which maps
`⟨a, b⟩ + ⟨c, d⟩` to `⟨d * a + b * c, b * d⟩`."]
protected irreducible_def mul : Localization S → Localization S → Localization S :=
(r S).commMonoid.mul
#align localization.mul Localization.mul
#align add_localization.add AddLocalization.add
@[to_additive]
instance : Mul (Localization S) := ⟨Localization.mul S⟩
/-- The identity element of a `Localization` is defined as `⟨1, 1⟩`. -/
@[to_additive "The identity element of an `AddLocalization` is defined as `⟨0, 0⟩`.
Should not be confused with the ring localization counterpart `Localization.zero`,
which is defined as `⟨0, 1⟩`."]
protected irreducible_def one : Localization S := (r S).commMonoid.one
#align localization.one Localization.one
#align add_localization.zero AddLocalization.zero
@[to_additive]
instance : One (Localization S) := ⟨Localization.one S⟩
/-- Exponentiation in a `Localization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ ^ n = ⟨a ^ n, b ^ n⟩`.
This is a separate `irreducible` def to ensure the elaborator doesn't waste its time
trying to unify some huge recursive definition with itself, but unfolded one step less.
-/
@[to_additive "Multiplication with a natural in an `AddLocalization` is defined as
`n • ⟨a, b⟩ = ⟨n • a, n • b⟩`.
This is a separate `irreducible` def to ensure the elaborator doesn't waste its time
trying to unify some huge recursive definition with itself, but unfolded one step less."]
protected irreducible_def npow : ℕ → Localization S → Localization S := (r S).commMonoid.npow
#align localization.npow Localization.npow
#align add_localization.nsmul AddLocalization.nsmul
@[to_additive]
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid (Localization S) where
mul := (· * ·)
one := 1
mul_assoc x y z := show (x.mul S y).mul S z = x.mul S (y.mul S z) by
rw [Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_assoc
mul_comm x y := show x.mul S y = y.mul S x by
rw [Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_comm
mul_one x := show x.mul S (.one S) = x by
rw [Localization.mul, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_one
one_mul x := show (Localization.one S).mul S x = x by
rw [Localization.mul, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.one_mul
npow := Localization.npow S
npow_zero x := show Localization.npow S 0 x = .one S by
rw [Localization.npow, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.npow_zero
npow_succ n x := show Localization.npow S n.succ x = (Localization.npow S n x).mul S x by
rw [Localization.npow, Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.npow_succ
variable {S}
/-- Given a `CommMonoid` `M` and submonoid `S`, `mk` sends `x : M`, `y ∈ S` to the equivalence
class of `(x, y)` in the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an `AddCommMonoid` `M` and submonoid `S`, `mk` sends `x : M`, `y ∈ S` to
the equivalence class of `(x, y)` in the localization of `M` at `S`."]
def mk (x : M) (y : S) : Localization S := (r S).mk' (x, y)
#align localization.mk Localization.mk
#align add_localization.mk AddLocalization.mk
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff {a c : M} {b d : S} : mk a b = mk c d ↔ r S ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨c, d⟩ := (r S).eq
#align localization.mk_eq_mk_iff Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff
#align add_localization.mk_eq_mk_iff AddLocalization.mk_eq_mk_iff
universe u
/-- Dependent recursion principle for `Localizations`: given elements `f a b : p (mk a b)`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d` (with the correct coercions),
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"Dependent recursion principle for `AddLocalizations`: given elements `f a b : p (mk a b)`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d` (with the correct coercions),
then `f` is defined on the whole `AddLocalization S`."]
def rec {p : Localization S → Sort u} (f : ∀ (a : M) (b : S), p (mk a b))
(H : ∀ {a c : M} {b d : S} (h : r S (a, b) (c, d)),
(Eq.ndrec (f a b) (mk_eq_mk_iff.mpr h) : p (mk c d)) = f c d) (x) : p x :=
Quot.rec (fun y ↦ Eq.ndrec (f y.1 y.2) (by rfl)) (fun y z h ↦ by cases y; cases z; exact H h) x
#align localization.rec Localization.rec
#align add_localization.rec AddLocalization.rec
/-- Copy of `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂` for `Localization` -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "Copy of `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂` for `AddLocalization`"]
def recOnSubsingleton₂ {r : Localization S → Localization S → Sort u}
[h : ∀ (a c : M) (b d : S), Subsingleton (r (mk a b) (mk c d))] (x y : Localization S)
(f : ∀ (a c : M) (b d : S), r (mk a b) (mk c d)) : r x y :=
@Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' _ _ _ _ r (Prod.rec fun _ _ => Prod.rec fun _ _ => h _ _ _ _) x y
(Prod.rec fun _ _ => Prod.rec fun _ _ => f _ _ _ _)
#align localization.rec_on_subsingleton₂ Localization.recOnSubsingleton₂
#align add_localization.rec_on_subsingleton₂ AddLocalization.recOnSubsingleton₂
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_mul (a c : M) (b d : S) : mk a b * mk c d = mk (a * c) (b * d) :=
show Localization.mul S _ _ = _ by rw [Localization.mul]; rfl
#align localization.mk_mul Localization.mk_mul
#align add_localization.mk_add AddLocalization.mk_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_one : mk 1 (1 : S) = 1 :=
show mk _ _ = .one S by rw [Localization.one]; rfl
#align localization.mk_one Localization.mk_one
#align add_localization.mk_zero AddLocalization.mk_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_pow (n : ℕ) (a : M) (b : S) : mk a b ^ n = mk (a ^ n) (b ^ n) :=
show Localization.npow S _ _ = _ by rw [Localization.npow]; rfl
#align localization.mk_pow Localization.mk_pow
#align add_localization.mk_nsmul AddLocalization.mk_nsmul
-- Porting note: mathport translated `rec` to `ndrec` in the name of this lemma
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ndrec_mk {p : Localization S → Sort u} (f : ∀ (a : M) (b : S), p (mk a b)) (H) (a : M)
(b : S) : (rec f H (mk a b) : p (mk a b)) = f a b := rfl
#align localization.rec_mk Localization.ndrec_mk
#align add_localization.rec_mk AddLocalization.ndrec_mk
/-- Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f a b : p`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
-- Porting note: the attribute `elab_as_elim` fails with `unexpected eliminator resulting type p`
-- @[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
@[to_additive
"Non-dependent recursion principle for `AddLocalization`s: given elements `f a b : p`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`."]
def liftOn {p : Sort u} (x : Localization S) (f : M → S → p)
(H : ∀ {a c : M} {b d : S}, r S (a, b) (c, d) → f a b = f c d) : p :=
rec f (fun h ↦ (by simpa only [eq_rec_constant] using H h)) x
#align localization.lift_on Localization.liftOn
#align add_localization.lift_on AddLocalization.liftOn
@[to_additive]
theorem liftOn_mk {p : Sort u} (f : M → S → p) (H) (a : M) (b : S) :
liftOn (mk a b) f H = f a b := rfl
#align localization.lift_on_mk Localization.liftOn_mk
#align add_localization.lift_on_mk AddLocalization.liftOn_mk
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem ind {p : Localization S → Prop} (H : ∀ y : M × S, p (mk y.1 y.2)) (x) : p x :=
rec (fun a b ↦ H (a, b)) (fun _ ↦ rfl) x
#align localization.ind Localization.ind
#align add_localization.ind AddLocalization.ind
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on {p : Localization S → Prop} (x) (H : ∀ y : M × S, p (mk y.1 y.2)) : p x :=
ind H x
#align localization.induction_on Localization.induction_on
#align add_localization.induction_on AddLocalization.induction_on
/-- Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f x y : p`
for all `x` and `y`, such that `r S x x'` and `r S y y'` implies `f x y = f x' y'`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
-- Porting note: the attribute `elab_as_elim` fails with `unexpected eliminator resulting type p`
-- @[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
@[to_additive
"Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f x y : p`
for all `x` and `y`, such that `r S x x'` and `r S y y'` implies `f x y = f x' y'`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`."]
def liftOn₂ {p : Sort u} (x y : Localization S) (f : M → S → M → S → p)
(H : ∀ {a a' b b' c c' d d'}, r S (a, b) (a', b') → r S (c, d) (c', d') →
f a b c d = f a' b' c' d') : p :=
liftOn x (fun a b ↦ liftOn y (f a b) fun hy ↦ H ((r S).refl _) hy) fun hx ↦
induction_on y fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ H hx ((r S).refl _)
#align localization.lift_on₂ Localization.liftOn₂
#align add_localization.lift_on₂ AddLocalization.liftOn₂
@[to_additive]
theorem liftOn₂_mk {p : Sort*} (f : M → S → M → S → p) (H) (a c : M) (b d : S) :
liftOn₂ (mk a b) (mk c d) f H = f a b c d := rfl
#align localization.lift_on₂_mk Localization.liftOn₂_mk
#align add_localization.lift_on₂_mk AddLocalization.liftOn₂_mk
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on₂ {p : Localization S → Localization S → Prop} (x y)
(H : ∀ x y : M × S, p (mk x.1 x.2) (mk y.1 y.2)) : p x y :=
induction_on x fun x ↦ induction_on y <| H x
#align localization.induction_on₂ Localization.induction_on₂
#align add_localization.induction_on₂ AddLocalization.induction_on₂
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on₃ {p : Localization S → Localization S → Localization S → Prop} (x y z)
(H : ∀ x y z : M × S, p (mk x.1 x.2) (mk y.1 y.2) (mk z.1 z.2)) : p x y z :=
induction_on₂ x y fun x y ↦ induction_on z <| H x y
#align localization.induction_on₃ Localization.induction_on₃
#align add_localization.induction_on₃ AddLocalization.induction_on₃
@[to_additive]
theorem one_rel (y : S) : r S 1 (y, y) := fun _ hb ↦ hb y
#align localization.one_rel Localization.one_rel
#align add_localization.zero_rel AddLocalization.zero_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem r_of_eq {x y : M × S} (h : ↑y.2 * x.1 = ↑x.2 * y.1) : r S x y :=
r_iff_exists.2 ⟨1, by rw [h]⟩
#align localization.r_of_eq Localization.r_of_eq
#align add_localization.r_of_eq AddLocalization.r_of_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_self (a : S) : mk (a : M) a = 1 := by
symm
rw [← mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff]
exact one_rel a
#align localization.mk_self Localization.mk_self
#align add_localization.mk_self AddLocalization.mk_self
section Scalar
variable {R R₁ R₂ : Type*}
/-- Scalar multiplication in a monoid localization is defined as `c • ⟨a, b⟩ = ⟨c • a, b⟩`. -/
protected irreducible_def smul [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] (c : R) (z : Localization S) :
Localization S :=
Localization.liftOn z (fun a b ↦ mk (c • a) b)
(fun {a a' b b'} h ↦ mk_eq_mk_iff.2 (by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := b
let ⟨b', hb'⟩ := b'
rw [r_eq_r'] at h ⊢
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := h
use t
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at ht ⊢
-- TODO: this definition should take `SMulCommClass R M M` instead of `IsScalarTower R M M` if
-- we ever want to generalize to the non-commutative case.
haveI : SMulCommClass R M M :=
⟨fun r m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_comm m₁, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
simp only [mul_smul_comm, ht]))
#align localization.smul Localization.smul
instance instSMulLocalization [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] : SMul R (Localization S) where
smul := Localization.smul
theorem smul_mk [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] (c : R) (a b) :
c • (mk a b : Localization S) = mk (c • a) b := by
simp only [HSMul.hSMul, instHSMul, SMul.smul, instSMulLocalization, Localization.smul]
show liftOn (mk a b) (fun a b => mk (c • a) b) _ = _
exact liftOn_mk (fun a b => mk (c • a) b) _ a b
#align localization.smul_mk Localization.smul_mk
instance [SMul R₁ M] [SMul R₂ M] [IsScalarTower R₁ M M] [IsScalarTower R₂ M M]
[SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ M] : SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (Localization S) where
smul_comm s t := Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_comm s t r]
instance [SMul R₁ M] [SMul R₂ M] [IsScalarTower R₁ M M] [IsScalarTower R₂ M M] [SMul R₁ R₂]
[IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ M] : IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (Localization S) where
smul_assoc s t := Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_assoc s t r]
instance smulCommClass_right {R : Type*} [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
SMulCommClass R (Localization S) (Localization S) where
smul_comm s :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by
simp only [smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, mk_mul, mul_comm r₁, smul_mul_assoc]
#align localization.smul_comm_class_right Localization.smulCommClass_right
instance isScalarTower_right {R : Type*} [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
IsScalarTower R (Localization S) (Localization S) where
smul_assoc s :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, mk_mul, smul_mul_assoc]
#align localization.is_scalar_tower_right Localization.isScalarTower_right
instance [SMul R M] [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsScalarTower R M M] [IsScalarTower Rᵐᵒᵖ M M]
[IsCentralScalar R M] : IsCentralScalar R (Localization S) where
op_smul_eq_smul s :=
Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, op_smul_eq_smul]
instance [Monoid R] [MulAction R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] : MulAction R (Localization S) where
one_smul :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intros
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, one_smul]
mul_smul s₁ s₂ :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intros
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, mul_smul]
instance [Monoid R] [MulDistribMulAction R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
MulDistribMulAction R (Localization S) where
smul_one s := by simp only [← Localization.mk_one, Localization.smul_mk, smul_one]
smul_mul s x y :=
Localization.induction_on₂ x y <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by simp only [Localization.smul_mk, Localization.mk_mul, smul_mul']
end Scalar
end Localization
variable {S N}
namespace MonoidHom
/-- Makes a localization map from a `CommMonoid` hom satisfying the characteristic predicate. -/
@[to_additive
"Makes a localization map from an `AddCommMonoid` hom satisfying the characteristic predicate."]
def toLocalizationMap (f : M →* N) (H1 : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y))
(H2 : ∀ z, ∃ x : M × S, z * f x.2 = f x.1) (H3 : ∀ x y, f x = f y → ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = ↑c * y) :
Submonoid.LocalizationMap S N :=
{ f with
map_units' := H1
surj' := H2
exists_of_eq := H3 }
#align monoid_hom.to_localization_map MonoidHom.toLocalizationMap
#align add_monoid_hom.to_localization_map AddMonoidHom.toLocalizationMap
end MonoidHom
namespace Submonoid
namespace LocalizationMap
/-- Short for `toMonoidHom`; used to apply a localization map as a function. -/
@[to_additive "Short for `toAddMonoidHom`; used to apply a localization map as a function."]
abbrev toMap (f : LocalizationMap S N) := f.toMonoidHom
#align submonoid.localization_map.to_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.to_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext {f g : LocalizationMap S N} (h : ∀ x, f.toMap x = g.toMap x) : f = g := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, MonoidHom.mk.injEq]
exact OneHom.ext h
#align submonoid.localization_map.ext Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ext
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.ext AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem ext_iff {f g : LocalizationMap S N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f.toMap x = g.toMap x :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ h ▸ rfl, ext⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.ext_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ext_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.ext_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ext_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem toMap_injective : Function.Injective (@LocalizationMap.toMap _ _ S N _) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ext <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h
#align submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap_injective
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem map_units (f : LocalizationMap S N) (y : S) : IsUnit (f.toMap y) :=
f.2 y
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_units Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_units
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_add_units AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_addUnits
@[to_additive]
theorem surj (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z : N) : ∃ x : M × S, z * f.toMap x.2 = f.toMap x.1 :=
f.3 z
#align submonoid.localization_map.surj Submonoid.LocalizationMap.surj
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.surj AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.surj
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, and `z w : N`, there exist `z' w' : M` and `d : S`
such that `f z' / f d = z` and `f w' / f d = w`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, and `z w : N`, there exist `z' w' : M` and `d : S`
such that `f z' - f d = z` and `f w' - f d = w`."]
theorem surj₂ (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z w : N) : ∃ z' w' : M, ∃ d : S,
(z * f.toMap d = f.toMap z') ∧ (w * f.toMap d = f.toMap w') := by
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := surj f z
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := surj f w
refine ⟨a.1 * b.2, a.2 * b.1, a.2 * b.2, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [mul_def, map_mul, ← ha]
exact (mul_assoc z _ _).symm
· simp_rw [mul_def, map_mul, ← hb]
exact mul_left_comm w _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_exists (f : LocalizationMap S N) {x y} :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = c * y := Iff.intro (f.4 x y)
fun ⟨c, h⟩ ↦ by
replace h := congr_arg f.toMap h
rw [map_mul, map_mul] at h
exact (f.map_units c).mul_right_inj.mp h
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_exists Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_exists AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, a section function sending `z : N` to some
`(x, y) : M × S` such that `f x * (f y)⁻¹ = z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, a section function sending `z : N`
to some `(x, y) : M × S` such that `f x - f y = z`."]
noncomputable def sec (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z : N) : M × S := Classical.choose <| f.surj z
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec
@[to_additive]
theorem sec_spec {f : LocalizationMap S N} (z : N) :
z * f.toMap (f.sec z).2 = f.toMap (f.sec z).1 := Classical.choose_spec <| f.surj z
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec
@[to_additive]
theorem sec_spec' {f : LocalizationMap S N} (z : N) :
f.toMap (f.sec z).1 = f.toMap (f.sec z).2 * z := by rw [mul_comm, sec_spec]
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec'
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `w * (f y)⁻¹ = z ↔ w = f y * z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `w - f y = z ↔ w = f y + z`."]
theorem mul_inv_left {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) (y : S) (w z : N) :
w * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ = z ↔ w = f y * z := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact Units.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg_left
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `z = w * (f y)⁻¹ ↔ z * f y = w`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `z = w - f y ↔ z + f y = w`."]
theorem mul_inv_right {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) (y : S) (w z : N) :
z = w * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ ↔ z * f y = w := by
rw [eq_comm, mul_inv_left h, mul_comm, eq_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg_right
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all `x₁ x₂ : M` and `y₁, y₂ ∈ S`, we have
`f x₁ * (f y₁)⁻¹ = f x₂ * (f y₂)⁻¹ ↔ f (x₁ * y₂) = f (x₂ * y₁)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `x₁ x₂ : M` and `y₁, y₂ ∈ S`, we have
`f x₁ - f y₁ = f x₂ - f y₂ ↔ f (x₁ + y₂) = f (x₂ + y₁)`."]
theorem mul_inv {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f x₁ * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y₁)⁻¹ =
f x₂ * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y₂)⁻¹ ↔
f (x₁ * y₂) = f (x₂ * y₁) := by
rw [mul_inv_right h, mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f y₂), ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left h, mul_comm x₂,
f.map_mul, f.map_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`y, z ∈ S`, we have `(f y)⁻¹ = (f z)⁻¹ → f y = f z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `y, z ∈ S`, we have `- (f y) = - (f z) → f y = f z`."]
theorem inv_inj {f : M →* N} (hf : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {y z : S}
(h : (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf y)⁻¹ = (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf z)⁻¹) :
f y = f z := by
rw [← mul_one (f y), eq_comm, ← mul_inv_left hf y (f z) 1, h]
exact Units.inv_mul (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf z)⁻¹
#align submonoid.localization_map.inv_inj Submonoid.LocalizationMap.inv_inj
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.neg_inj AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.neg_inj
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`y ∈ S`, `(f y)⁻¹` is unique. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `y ∈ S`, `- (f y)` is unique."]
theorem inv_unique {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {y : S} {z : N} (H : f y * z = 1) :
(IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ = z := by
rw [← one_mul _⁻¹, Units.val_mul, mul_inv_left]
exact H.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.inv_unique Submonoid.LocalizationMap.inv_unique
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.neg_unique AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.neg_unique
variable (f : LocalizationMap S N)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_right_cancel {x y} {c : S} (h : f.toMap (c * x) = f.toMap (c * y)) :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y := by
rw [f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul] at h
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := f.map_units c
rw [← hu] at h
exact (Units.mul_right_inj u).1 h
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_right_cancel Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_right_cancel
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_right_cancel AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_right_cancel
@[to_additive]
theorem map_left_cancel {x y} {c : S} (h : f.toMap (x * c) = f.toMap (y * c)) :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y :=
f.map_right_cancel <| by rw [mul_comm _ x, mul_comm _ y, h]
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_left_cancel Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_left_cancel
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_left_cancel AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_left_cancel
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, the surjection sending `(x, y) : M × S` to
`f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, the surjection sending `(x, y) : M × S`
to `f x - f y`."]
noncomputable def mk' (f : LocalizationMap S N) (x : M) (y : S) : N :=
f.toMap x * ↑(IsUnit.liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units y)⁻¹
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul (x₁ x₂ : M) (y₁ y₂ : S) : f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) (y₁ * y₂) = f.mk' x₁ y₁ * f.mk' x₂ y₂ :=
(mul_inv_left f.map_units _ _ _).2 <|
show _ = _ * (_ * _ * (_ * _)) by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right f.map_units, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ (f.toMap x₂), ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right f.map_units,
Submonoid.coe_mul, f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul]
ac_rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_one (x) : f.mk' x (1 : S) = f.toMap x := by
rw [mk', MonoidHom.map_one]
exact mul_one _
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_one Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_one
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_zero AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_zero
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N` for a submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `z : N` we have that if
`x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`, then `f x * (f y)⁻¹ = z`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `z : N`
we have that if `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`, then `f x - f y = z`."]
theorem mk'_sec (z : N) : f.mk' (f.sec z).1 (f.sec z).2 = z :=
show _ * _ = _ by rw [← sec_spec, mul_inv_left, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_sec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_sec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_sec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_sec
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_surjective (z : N) : ∃ (x : _) (y : S), f.mk' x y = z :=
⟨(f.sec z).1, (f.sec z).2, f.mk'_sec z⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_surjective Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_surjective
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_surjective AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_spec (x) (y : S) : f.mk' x y * f.toMap y = f.toMap x :=
show _ * _ * _ = _ by rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f.toMap y), ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_spec' (x) (y : S) : f.toMap y * f.mk' x y = f.toMap x := by rw [mul_comm, mk'_spec]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq {x} {y : S} {z} : z = f.mk' x y ↔ z * f.toMap y = f.toMap x :=
⟨fun H ↦ by rw [H, mk'_spec], fun H ↦ by erw [mul_inv_right, H]⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_mk'_iff_add_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_mk'_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul {x} {y : S} {z} : f.mk' x y = z ↔ f.toMap x = z * f.toMap y := by
rw [eq_comm, eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, eq_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ f.toMap (y₂ * x₁) = f.toMap (y₁ * x₂) :=
⟨fun H ↦ by
rw [f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul, f.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.1 H,← mul_assoc, mk'_spec',
mul_comm ((toMap f) x₂) _],
fun H ↦ by
rw [mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul, mk', mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f.toMap y₁), ← mul_assoc, ←
f.toMap.map_mul, mul_comm x₂, ← H, ← mul_comm x₁, f.toMap.map_mul,
mul_inv_right f.map_units]⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq' {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ f.toMap (x₁ * y₂) = f.toMap (x₂ * y₁) := by
simp only [f.mk'_eq_iff_eq, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq'
@[to_additive]
protected theorem eq {a₁ b₁} {a₂ b₂ : S} :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑b₂ * a₁) = c * (a₂ * b₁) :=
f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.trans <| f.eq_iff_exists
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq
@[to_additive]
protected theorem eq' {a₁ b₁} {a₂ b₂ : S} :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ ↔ Localization.r S (a₁, a₂) (b₁, b₂) := by
rw [f.eq, Localization.r_iff_exists]
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_eq (g : LocalizationMap S P) {x y} : f.toMap x = f.toMap y ↔ g.toMap x = g.toMap y :=
f.eq_iff_exists.trans g.eq_iff_exists.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq (g : LocalizationMap S P) {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ g.mk' x₁ y₁ = g.mk' x₂ y₂ :=
f.eq'.trans g.eq'.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `x₁ : M` and `y₁ ∈ S`,
if `x₂ : M, y₂ ∈ S` are such that `f x₁ * (f y₁)⁻¹ * f y₂ = f x₂`, then there exists `c ∈ S`
such that `x₁ * y₂ * c = x₂ * y₁ * c`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `x₁ : M`
and `y₁ ∈ S`, if `x₂ : M, y₂ ∈ S` are such that `(f x₁ - f y₁) + f y₂ = f x₂`, then there exists
`c ∈ S` such that `x₁ + y₂ + c = x₂ + y₁ + c`."]
theorem exists_of_sec_mk' (x) (y : S) :
∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑(f.sec <| f.mk' x y).2 * x) = c * (y * (f.sec <| f.mk' x y).1) :=
f.eq_iff_exists.1 <| f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.1 <| (mk'_sec _ _).symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.exists_of_sec_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_sec_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.exists_of_sec_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_sec_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_eq {a₁ b₁ : M} {a₂ b₂ : S} (H : ↑a₂ * b₁ = ↑b₂ * a₁) :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ :=
f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.2 <| H ▸ rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_eq' {a₁ b₁ : M} {a₂ b₂ : S} (H : b₁ * ↑a₂ = a₁ * ↑b₂) :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ :=
f.mk'_eq_of_eq <| by simpa only [mul_comm] using H
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_cancel (a : M) (b c : S) :
f.mk' (a * c) (b * c) = f.mk' a b :=
mk'_eq_of_eq' f (by rw [Submonoid.coe_mul, mul_comm (b:M), mul_assoc])
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_same {a b} {d : S} :
f.mk' a d = f.mk' b d ↔ ∃ c : S, c * a = c * b := by
rw [mk'_eq_iff_eq', map_mul, map_mul, ← eq_iff_exists f]
exact (map_units f d).mul_left_inj
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_self' (y : S) : f.mk' (y : M) y = 1 :=
show _ * _ = _ by rw [mul_inv_left, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_self (x) (H : x ∈ S) : f.mk' x ⟨x, H⟩ = 1 := mk'_self' f ⟨x, H⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul (x₁ x₂) (y : S) : f.toMap x₁ * f.mk' x₂ y = f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) y := by
rw [← mk'_one, ← mk'_mul, one_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_mk'_eq_mk'_of_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_mk'_eq_mk'_of_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul (x₁ x₂) (y : S) : f.mk' x₂ y * f.toMap x₁ = f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) y := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_eq_mk'_of_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_eq_mk'_of_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mk'_one_eq_mk' (x) (y : S) : f.toMap x * f.mk' 1 y = f.mk' x y := by
rw [mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_mk'_one_eq_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_mk'_one_eq_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_mk'_zero_eq_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_mk'_zero_eq_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_mul_cancel_right (x : M) (y : S) : f.mk' (x * y) y = f.toMap x := by
rw [← mul_mk'_one_eq_mk', f.toMap.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_mk'_one_eq_mk', mk'_self', mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_cancel_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_cancel_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_cancel_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul_cancel_left (x) (y : S) : f.mk' ((y : M) * x) y = f.toMap x := by
rw [mul_comm, mk'_mul_cancel_right]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_cancel_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_cancel_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_cancel_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_cancel_left
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_comp (j : N →* P) (y : S) : IsUnit (j.comp f.toMap y) :=
⟨Units.map j <| IsUnit.liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units y,
show j _ = j _ from congr_arg j <| IsUnit.coe_liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units _⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.is_unit_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.isUnit_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.is_add_unit_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.isAddUnit_comp
variable {g : M →* P}
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ Units P`, `f x = f y → g x = g y` for all `x y : M`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g(S) ⊆ AddUnits P`, `f x = f y → g x = g y`
for all `x y : M`."]
theorem eq_of_eq (hg : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (g y)) {x y} (h : f.toMap x = f.toMap y) : g x = g y := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := f.eq_iff_exists.1 h
rw [← one_mul (g x), ← IsUnit.liftRight_inv_mul (g.restrict S) hg c]
show _ * g c * _ = _
rw [mul_assoc, ← g.map_mul, hc, mul_comm, mul_inv_left hg, g.map_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_of_eq
/-- Given `CommMonoid`s `M, P`, Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids
`S, T` respectively, and `g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T`, `f x = f y` implies
`k (g x) = k (g y)`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given `AddCommMonoid`s `M, P`, Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids
`S, T` respectively, and `g : M →+ P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T`, `f x = f y`
implies `k (g x) = k (g y)`."]
theorem comp_eq_of_eq {T : Submonoid P} {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q] (hg : ∀ y : S, g y ∈ T)
(k : LocalizationMap T Q) {x y} (h : f.toMap x = f.toMap y) : k.toMap (g x) = k.toMap (g y) :=
f.eq_of_eq (fun y : S ↦ show IsUnit (k.toMap.comp g y) from k.map_units ⟨g y, hg y⟩) h
#align submonoid.localization_map.comp_eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.comp_eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.comp_eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.comp_eq_of_eq
variable (hg : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (g y))
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism induced from
`N` to `P` sending `z : N` to `g x * (g y)⁻¹`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such that
`z = f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N` for a submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism
induced from `N` to `P` sending `z : N` to `g x - g y`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such that
`z = f x - f y`."]
noncomputable def lift : N →* P where
toFun z := g (f.sec z).1 * (IsUnit.liftRight (g.restrict S) hg (f.sec z).2)⁻¹
map_one' := by rw [mul_inv_left, mul_one]; exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by rw [← sec_spec, one_mul])
map_mul' x y := by
dsimp only
rw [mul_inv_left hg, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right hg, mul_comm _ (g (f.sec y).1), ←
mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right hg]
repeat rw [← g.map_mul]
exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by simp_rw [f.toMap.map_mul, sec_spec']; ac_rfl)
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism induced from
`N` to `P` maps `f x * (f y)⁻¹` to `g x * (g y)⁻¹` for all `x : M, y ∈ S`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism
induced from `N` to `P` maps `f x - f y` to `g x - g y` for all `x : M, y ∈ S`."]
theorem lift_mk' (x y) : f.lift hg (f.mk' x y) = g x * (IsUnit.liftRight (g.restrict S) hg y)⁻¹ :=
(mul_inv hg).2 <|
f.eq_of_eq hg <| by
simp_rw [f.toMap.map_mul, sec_spec', mul_assoc, f.mk'_spec, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N, v : P`, we have
`f.lift hg z = v ↔ g x = g y * v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an
`AddCommMonoid` map `g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all
`z : N, v : P`, we have `f.lift hg z = v ↔ g x = g y + v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_spec (z v) : f.lift hg z = v ↔ g (f.sec z).1 = g (f.sec z).2 * v :=
mul_inv_left hg _ _ v
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N, v w : P`, we have
`f.lift hg z * w = v ↔ g x * w = g y * v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid` map
`g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all
`z : N, v w : P`, we have `f.lift hg z + w = v ↔ g x + w = g y + v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such
that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_spec_mul (z w v) : f.lift hg z * w = v ↔ g (f.sec z).1 * w = g (f.sec z).2 * v := by
erw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left hg, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec_add
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_mk'_spec (x v) (y : S) : f.lift hg (f.mk' x y) = v ↔ g x = g y * v := by
rw [f.lift_mk' hg]; exact mul_inv_left hg _ _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk'_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk'_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'_spec
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`f.lift hg z * g y = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid`
map `g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`f.lift hg z + g y = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_mul_right (z) : f.lift hg z * g (f.sec z).2 = g (f.sec z).1 := by
erw [mul_assoc, IsUnit.liftRight_inv_mul, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mul_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mul_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_add_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_add_right
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`g y * f.lift hg z = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid` map
`g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`g y + f.lift hg z = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_mul_left (z) : g (f.sec z).2 * f.lift hg z = g (f.sec z).1 := by
rw [mul_comm, lift_mul_right]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mul_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mul_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_add_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_eq (x : M) : f.lift hg (f.toMap x) = g x := by
rw [lift_spec, ← g.map_mul]; exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by rw [sec_spec', f.toMap.map_mul])
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_eq_iff {x y : M × S} :
f.lift hg (f.mk' x.1 x.2) = f.lift hg (f.mk' y.1 y.2) ↔ g (x.1 * y.2) = g (y.1 * x.2) := by
rw [lift_mk', lift_mk', mul_inv hg]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp : (f.lift hg).comp f.toMap = g := by ext; exact f.lift_eq hg _
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_of_comp (j : N →* P) : f.lift (f.isUnit_comp j) = j := by
ext
rw [lift_spec]
show j _ = j _ * _
erw [← j.map_mul, sec_spec']
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_of_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_of_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_of_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_of_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem epic_of_localizationMap {j k : N →* P} (h : ∀ a, j.comp f.toMap a = k.comp f.toMap a) :
j = k := by
rw [← f.lift_of_comp j, ← f.lift_of_comp k]
congr 1 with x; exact h x
#align submonoid.localization_map.epic_of_localization_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.epic_of_localizationMap
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.epic_of_localization_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.epic_of_localizationMap
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_unique {j : N →* P} (hj : ∀ x, j (f.toMap x) = g x) : f.lift hg = j := by
ext
rw [lift_spec, ← hj, ← hj, ← j.map_mul]
apply congr_arg
rw [← sec_spec']
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_unique Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_unique
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_unique AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_unique
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_id (x) : f.lift f.map_units x = x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (f.lift_of_comp <| MonoidHom.id N) x
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_id Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_id
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_id AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_id
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and
`k : M →* Q` for a Submonoid `T ⊆ M`, such that `S ≤ T`, and we have
`l : M →* A`, the composition of the induced map `f.lift` for `k` with
the induced map `k.lift` for `l` is equal to the induced map `f.lift` for `l`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and
`k : M →+ Q` for a Submonoid `T ⊆ M`, such that `S ≤ T`, and we have
`l : M →+ A`, the composition of the induced map `f.lift` for `k` with
the induced map `k.lift` for `l` is equal to the induced map `f.lift` for `l`"]
theorem lift_comp_lift {T : Submonoid M} (hST : S ≤ T) {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q]
(k : LocalizationMap T Q) {A : Type*} [CommMonoid A] {l : M →* A}
(hl : ∀ w : T, IsUnit (l w)) :
(k.lift hl).comp (f.lift (map_units k ⟨_, hST ·.2⟩)) =
f.lift (hl ⟨_, hST ·.2⟩) := .symm <|
lift_unique _ _ fun x ↦ by rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply,
MonoidHom.comp_assoc, lift_comp, lift_comp]
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_comp_lift_eq {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q] (k : LocalizationMap S Q)
{A : Type*} [CommMonoid A] {l : M →* A} (hl : ∀ w : S, IsUnit (l w)) :
(k.lift hl).comp (f.lift k.map_units) = f.lift hl :=
lift_comp_lift f le_rfl k hl
/-- Given two Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : M →* P` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, the hom
from `P` to `N` induced by `f` is left inverse to the hom from `N` to `P` induced by `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Given two Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : M →+ P` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, the hom
from `P` to `N` induced by `f` is left inverse to the hom from `N` to `P` induced by `k`."]
theorem lift_left_inverse {k : LocalizationMap S P} (z : N) :
k.lift f.map_units (f.lift k.map_units z) = z :=
(DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_comp_lift_eq f k f.map_units) z).trans (lift_id f z)
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_left_inverse Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_left_inverse
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_left_inverse AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_left_inverse
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_surjective_iff :
Function.Surjective (f.lift hg) ↔ ∀ v : P, ∃ x : M × S, v * g x.2 = g x.1 := by
constructor
· intro H v
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := H v
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := f.surj z
use x
rw [← hz, f.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq.2 hx, lift_mk', mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (g ↑x.2)]
erw [IsUnit.mul_liftRight_inv (g.restrict S) hg, mul_one]
· intro H v
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := H v
use f.mk' x.1 x.2
rw [lift_mk', mul_inv_left hg, mul_comm, ← hx]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_surjective_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_surjective_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_surjective_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_surjective_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_injective_iff :
Function.Injective (f.lift hg) ↔ ∀ x y, f.toMap x = f.toMap y ↔ g x = g y := by
constructor
· intro H x y
constructor
· exact f.eq_of_eq hg
· intro h
rw [← f.lift_eq hg, ← f.lift_eq hg] at h
exact H h
· intro H z w h
obtain ⟨_, _⟩ := f.surj z
obtain ⟨_, _⟩ := f.surj w
rw [← f.mk'_sec z, ← f.mk'_sec w]
exact (mul_inv f.map_units).2 ((H _ _).2 <| (mul_inv hg).1 h)
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_injective_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_injective_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_injective_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_injective_iff
variable {T : Submonoid P} (hy : ∀ y : S, g y ∈ T) {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q]
(k : LocalizationMap T Q)
/-- Given a `CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P` where for Submonoids `S ⊆ M, T ⊆ P` we have
`g(S) ⊆ T`, the induced Monoid homomorphism from the Localization of `M` at `S` to the
Localization of `P` at `T`: if `f : M →* N` and `k : P →* Q` are Localization maps for `S` and
`T` respectively, we send `z : N` to `k (g x) * (k (g y))⁻¹`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such
that `z = f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an `AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P` where for Submonoids `S ⊆ M, T ⊆ P` we have
`g(S) ⊆ T`, the induced AddMonoid homomorphism from the Localization of `M` at `S` to the
Localization of `P` at `T`: if `f : M →+ N` and `k : P →+ Q` are Localization maps for `S` and
`T` respectively, we send `z : N` to `k (g x) - k (g y)`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such
that `z = f x - f y`."]
noncomputable def map : N →* Q :=
@lift _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f (k.toMap.comp g) fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map
variable {k}
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq (x) : f.map hy k (f.toMap x) = k.toMap (g x) :=
f.lift_eq (fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩) x
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comp : (f.map hy k).comp f.toMap = k.toMap.comp g :=
f.lift_comp fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mk' (x) (y : S) : f.map hy k (f.mk' x y) = k.mk' (g x) ⟨g y, hy y⟩ := by
rw [map, lift_mk', mul_inv_left]
show k.toMap (g x) = k.toMap (g y) * _
rw [mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul]
exact (k.mk'_mul_cancel_left (g x) ⟨g y, hy y⟩).symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_mk'
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if a
`CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →* Q`, then for all `z : N`,
`u : Q`, we have `f.map hy k z = u ↔ k (g x) = k (g y) * u` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if an
`AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →+ Q`, then for all `z : N`,
`u : Q`, we have `f.map hy k z = u ↔ k (g x) = k (g y) + u` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem map_spec (z u) : f.map hy k z = u ↔ k.toMap (g (f.sec z).1) = k.toMap (g (f.sec z).2) * u :=
f.lift_spec (fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩) _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_spec
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if a
`CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →* Q`, then for all `z : N`,
we have `f.map hy k z * k (g y) = k (g x)` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if an
`AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →+ Q`, then for all `z : N`,
we have `f.map hy k z + k (g y) = k (g x)` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem map_mul_right (z) : f.map hy k z * k.toMap (g (f.sec z).2) = k.toMap (g (f.sec z).1) :=
f.lift_mul_right (fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩) _
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_mul_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_mul_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_add_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_add_right
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if a
`CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →* Q`, then for all `z : N`,
we have `k (g y) * f.map hy k z = k (g x)` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively if an
`AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →+ Q`, then for all `z : N`,
we have `k (g y) + f.map hy k z = k (g x)` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem map_mul_left (z) : k.toMap (g (f.sec z).2) * f.map hy k z = k.toMap (g (f.sec z).1) := by
rw [mul_comm, f.map_mul_right]
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_mul_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_mul_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_add_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id (z : N) : f.map (fun y ↦ show MonoidHom.id M y ∈ S from y.2) f z = z :=
f.lift_id z
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_id Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_id
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_id AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_id
/-- If `CommMonoid` homs `g : M →* P, l : P →* A` induce maps of localizations, the composition
of the induced maps equals the map of localizations induced by `l ∘ g`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `AddCommMonoid` homs `g : M →+ P, l : P →+ A` induce maps of localizations, the composition
of the induced maps equals the map of localizations induced by `l ∘ g`."]
theorem map_comp_map {A : Type*} [CommMonoid A] {U : Submonoid A} {R} [CommMonoid R]
(j : LocalizationMap U R) {l : P →* A} (hl : ∀ w : T, l w ∈ U) :
(k.map hl j).comp (f.map hy k) =
f.map (fun x ↦ show l.comp g x ∈ U from hl ⟨g x, hy x⟩) j := by
ext z
show j.toMap _ * _ = j.toMap (l _) * _
rw [mul_inv_left, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right]
show j.toMap _ * j.toMap (l (g _)) = j.toMap (l _) * _
rw [← j.toMap.map_mul, ← j.toMap.map_mul, ← l.map_mul, ← l.map_mul]
exact
k.comp_eq_of_eq hl j
(by rw [k.toMap.map_mul, k.toMap.map_mul, sec_spec', mul_assoc, map_mul_right])
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_comp_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_comp_map
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_comp_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_comp_map
/-- If `CommMonoid` homs `g : M →* P, l : P →* A` induce maps of localizations, the composition
of the induced maps equals the map of localizations induced by `l ∘ g`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `AddCommMonoid` homs `g : M →+ P, l : P →+ A` induce maps of localizations, the composition
of the induced maps equals the map of localizations induced by `l ∘ g`."]
theorem map_map {A : Type*} [CommMonoid A] {U : Submonoid A} {R} [CommMonoid R]
(j : LocalizationMap U R) {l : P →* A} (hl : ∀ w : T, l w ∈ U) (x) :
k.map hl j (f.map hy k x) = f.map (fun x ↦ show l.comp g x ∈ U from hl ⟨g x, hy x⟩) j x := by
-- Porting note: Lean has a hard time figuring out what the implicit arguments should be
-- when calling `map_comp_map`. Hence the original line below has to be replaced by a much more
-- explicit one
-- rw [← f.map_comp_map hy j hl]
rw [← @map_comp_map M _ S N _ P _ f g T hy Q _ k A _ U R _ j l hl]
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, comp_apply]
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_map
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_map
/-- Given an injective `CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P`, and a submonoid `S ⊆ M`,
the induced monoid homomorphism from the localization of `M` at `S` to the
localization of `P` at `g S`, is injective.
-/
@[to_additive "Given an injective `AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P`, and a
submonoid `S ⊆ M`, the induced monoid homomorphism from the localization of `M` at `S`
to the localization of `P` at `g S`, is injective. "]
theorem map_injective_of_injective (hg : Injective g) (k : LocalizationMap (S.map g) Q) :
Injective (map f (apply_coe_mem_map g S) k) := fun z w hizw ↦ by
set i := map f (apply_coe_mem_map g S) k
have ifkg (a : M) : i (f.toMap a) = k.toMap (g a) := map_eq f (apply_coe_mem_map g S) a
let ⟨z', w', x, hxz, hxw⟩ := surj₂ f z w
have : k.toMap (g z') = k.toMap (g w') := by
rw [← ifkg, ← ifkg, ← hxz, ← hxw, map_mul, map_mul, hizw]
obtain ⟨⟨_, c, hc, rfl⟩, eq⟩ := k.exists_of_eq _ _ this
simp_rw [← map_mul, hg.eq_iff] at eq
rw [← (f.map_units x).mul_left_inj, hxz, hxw, f.eq_iff_exists]
exact ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, eq⟩
section AwayMap
variable (x : M)
/-- Given `x : M`, the type of `CommMonoid` homomorphisms `f : M →* N` such that `N`
is isomorphic to the Localization of `M` at the Submonoid generated by `x`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Given `x : M`, the type of `AddCommMonoid` homomorphisms `f : M →+ N` such that `N`
is isomorphic to the localization of `M` at the AddSubmonoid generated by `x`."]
def AwayMap (N' : Type*) [CommMonoid N'] := LocalizationMap (powers x) N'
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap
variable (F : AwayMap x N)
/-- Given `x : M` and a Localization map `F : M →* N` away from `x`, `invSelf` is `(F x)⁻¹`. -/
noncomputable def AwayMap.invSelf : N := F.mk' 1 ⟨x, mem_powers _⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map.inv_self Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.invSelf
/-- Given `x : M`, a Localization map `F : M →* N` away from `x`, and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g x` is invertible, the homomorphism induced from `N` to `P` sending
`z : N` to `g y * (g x)⁻ⁿ`, where `y : M, n : ℕ` are such that `z = F y * (F x)⁻ⁿ`. -/
noncomputable def AwayMap.lift (hg : IsUnit (g x)) : N →* P :=
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift F fun y ↦
show IsUnit (g y.1) by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := y.2
rw [← hn, g.map_pow]
exact IsUnit.pow n hg
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift
@[simp]
theorem AwayMap.lift_eq (hg : IsUnit (g x)) (a : M) : F.lift x hg (F.toMap a) = g a :=
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq _ _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift_eq
@[simp]
theorem AwayMap.lift_comp (hg : IsUnit (g x)) : (F.lift x hg).comp F.toMap = g :=
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift_comp
/-- Given `x y : M` and Localization maps `F : M →* N, G : M →* P` away from `x` and `x * y`
respectively, the homomorphism induced from `N` to `P`. -/
noncomputable def awayToAwayRight (y : M) (G : AwayMap (x * y) P) : N →* P :=
F.lift x <|
show IsUnit (G.toMap x) from
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one (G.toMap x) (G.mk' y ⟨x * y, mem_powers _⟩) <| by
rw [mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, mk'_self]
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_to_away_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.awayToAwayRight
end AwayMap
end LocalizationMap
end Submonoid
namespace AddSubmonoid
namespace LocalizationMap
section AwayMap
variable {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] (x : A) {B : Type*} [AddCommMonoid B] (F : AwayMap x B)
{C : Type*} [AddCommMonoid C] {g : A →+ C}
/-- Given `x : A` and a Localization map `F : A →+ B` away from `x`, `neg_self` is `- (F x)`. -/
noncomputable def AwayMap.negSelf : B :=
F.mk' 0 ⟨x, mem_multiples _⟩
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map.neg_self AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.negSelf
/-- Given `x : A`, a localization map `F : A →+ B` away from `x`, and a map of `AddCommMonoid`s
`g : A →+ C` such that `g x` is invertible, the homomorphism induced from `B` to `C` sending
`z : B` to `g y - n • g x`, where `y : A, n : ℕ` are such that `z = F y - n • F x`. -/
noncomputable def AwayMap.lift (hg : IsAddUnit (g x)) : B →+ C :=
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift F fun y ↦
show IsAddUnit (g y.1) by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := y.2
rw [← hn]
dsimp
rw [g.map_nsmul]
exact IsAddUnit.map (nsmulAddMonoidHom n : C →+ C) hg
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift
@[simp]
theorem AwayMap.lift_eq (hg : IsAddUnit (g x)) (a : A) : F.lift x hg (F.toMap a) = g a :=
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq _ _ _
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift_eq
@[simp]
theorem AwayMap.lift_comp (hg : IsAddUnit (g x)) : (F.lift x hg).comp F.toMap = g :=
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp _ _
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift_comp
/-- Given `x y : A` and Localization maps `F : A →+ B, G : A →+ C` away from `x` and `x + y`
respectively, the homomorphism induced from `B` to `C`. -/
noncomputable def awayToAwayRight (y : A) (G : AwayMap (x + y) C) : B →+ C :=
F.lift x <|
show IsAddUnit (G.toMap x) from
isAddUnit_of_add_eq_zero (G.toMap x) (G.mk' y ⟨x + y, mem_multiples _⟩) <| by
rw [add_mk'_eq_mk'_of_add, mk'_self]
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_to_away_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.awayToAwayRight
end AwayMap
end LocalizationMap
end AddSubmonoid
namespace Submonoid
namespace LocalizationMap
variable (f : S.LocalizationMap N) {g : M →* P} (hg : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (g y)) {T : Submonoid P}
{Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q]
/-- If `f : M →* N` and `k : M →* P` are Localization maps for a Submonoid `S`, we get an
isomorphism of `N` and `P`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f : M →+ N` and `k : M →+ R` are Localization maps for an AddSubmonoid `S`, we get an
isomorphism of `N` and `R`."]
noncomputable def mulEquivOfLocalizations (k : LocalizationMap S P) : N ≃* P :=
{ toFun := f.lift k.map_units
invFun := k.lift f.map_units
left_inv := f.lift_left_inverse
right_inv := k.lift_left_inverse
map_mul' := MonoidHom.map_mul _ }
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_apply {k : LocalizationMap S P} {x} :
f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k x = f.lift k.map_units x := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_symm_apply {k : LocalizationMap S P} {x} :
(f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k).symm x = k.lift f.map_units x := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_symm_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_symm_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_symm_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_symm_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_symm_eq_mulEquivOfLocalizations {k : LocalizationMap S P} :
(k.mulEquivOfLocalizations f).symm = f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_symm_eq_mul_equiv_of_localizations Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_symm_eq_mulEquivOfLocalizations
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_symm_eq_add_equiv_of_localizations AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_symm_eq_addEquivOfLocalizations
/-- If `f : M →* N` is a Localization map for a Submonoid `S` and `k : N ≃* P` is an isomorphism
of `CommMonoid`s, `k ∘ f` is a Localization map for `M` at `S`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f : M →+ N` is a Localization map for a Submonoid `S` and `k : N ≃+ P` is an isomorphism
of `AddCommMonoid`s, `k ∘ f` is a Localization map for `M` at `S`."]
def ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (k : N ≃* P) : LocalizationMap S P :=
(k.toMonoidHom.comp f.toMap).toLocalizationMap (fun y ↦ isUnit_comp f k.toMonoidHom y)
(fun v ↦
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := k.toEquiv.surjective v
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := f.surj z
⟨x, show v * k _ = k _ by rw [← hx, k.map_mul, ← hz]; rfl⟩)
fun x y ↦ (k.apply_eq_iff_eq.trans f.eq_iff_exists).1
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply {k : N ≃* P} (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap x = k (f.toMap x) := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_eq {k : N ≃* P} :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap = k.toMonoidHom.comp f.toMap := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem symm_comp_ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply {k : N ≃* P} (x) :
k.symm ((f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap x) = f.toMap x := k.symm_apply_apply (f.toMap x)
#align submonoid.localization_map.symm_comp_of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.symm_comp_ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.symm_comp_of_add_equiv_of_localizations_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.symm_comp_ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem symm_comp_ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply' {k : P ≃* N} (x) :
k ((f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k.symm).toMap x) = f.toMap x := k.apply_symm_apply (f.toMap x)
#align submonoid.localization_map.symm_comp_of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_apply' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.symm_comp_ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.symm_comp_of_add_equiv_of_localizations_apply' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.symm_comp_ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_apply'
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_eq_iff_eq {k : N ≃* P} {x y} :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap x = y ↔ f.toMap x = k.symm y :=
k.toEquiv.eq_symm_apply.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_eq_iff_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_eq_iff_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_eq_iff_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive addEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv (k : LocalizationMap S P) :
f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k) = k :=
toMap_injective <| f.lift_comp k.map_units
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_right_inv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_right_inv AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[to_additive addEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv_apply]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv_apply {k : LocalizationMap S P} {x} :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k)).toMap x = k.toMap x := by simp
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_right_inv_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_right_inv_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_left_inv (k : N ≃* P) :
f.mulEquivOfLocalizations (f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k) = k :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (f.lift_of_comp k.toMonoidHom) x
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_left_inv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_left_inv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_left_neg AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_left_neg
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_left_inv_apply {k : N ≃* P} (x) :
f.mulEquivOfLocalizations (f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k) x = k x := by simp
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_left_inv_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_left_inv_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_left_neg_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_left_neg_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_id : f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (MulEquiv.refl N) = f := by
ext; rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_id Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_id
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_id AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_id
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_comp {k : N ≃* P} {j : P ≃* Q} :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (k.trans j)).toMap =
j.toMonoidHom.comp (f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap := by
ext; rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_comp
/-- Given `CommMonoid`s `M, P` and Submonoids `S ⊆ M, T ⊆ P`, if `f : M →* N` is a Localization
map for `S` and `k : P ≃* M` is an isomorphism of `CommMonoid`s such that `k(T) = S`, `f ∘ k`
is a Localization map for `T`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given `AddCommMonoid`s `M, P` and `AddSubmonoid`s `S ⊆ M, T ⊆ P`, if `f : M →* N` is a
Localization map for `S` and `k : P ≃+ M` is an isomorphism of `AddCommMonoid`s such that
`k(T) = S`, `f ∘ k` is a Localization map for `T`."]
def ofMulEquivOfDom {k : P ≃* M} (H : T.map k.toMonoidHom = S) : LocalizationMap T N :=
let H' : S.comap k.toMonoidHom = T :=
H ▸ (SetLike.coe_injective <| T.1.1.preimage_image_eq k.toEquiv.injective)
(f.toMap.comp k.toMonoidHom).toLocalizationMap
(fun y ↦
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := f.map_units ⟨k y, H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem k y.2⟩
⟨z, hz⟩)
(fun z ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := f.surj z
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := k.toEquiv.surjective x.1
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := k.toEquiv.surjective x.2
⟨(v, ⟨w, H' ▸ show k w ∈ S from hw.symm ▸ x.2.2⟩),
show z * f.toMap (k.toEquiv w) = f.toMap (k.toEquiv v) by erw [hv, hw, hx]⟩)
fun x y ↦
show f.toMap _ = f.toMap _ → _ by
erw [f.eq_iff_exists]
exact
fun ⟨c, hc⟩ ↦
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := k.toEquiv.surjective c
⟨⟨d, H' ▸ show k d ∈ S from hd.symm ▸ c.2⟩, by
erw [← hd, ← k.map_mul, ← k.map_mul] at hc; exact k.toEquiv.injective hc⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_apply {k : P ≃* M} (H : T.map k.toMonoidHom = S) (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfDom H).toMap x = f.toMap (k x) := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_eq {k : P ≃* M} (H : T.map k.toMonoidHom = S) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfDom H).toMap = f.toMap.comp k.toMonoidHom := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_comp_symm {k : P ≃* M} (H : T.map k.toMonoidHom = S) (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfDom H).toMap (k.symm x) = f.toMap x :=
congr_arg f.toMap <| k.apply_symm_apply x
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_comp_symm Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_comp_symm
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_comp_symm AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_comp_symm
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_comp {k : M ≃* P} (H : T.map k.symm.toMonoidHom = S) (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfDom H).toMap (k x) = f.toMap x := congr_arg f.toMap <| k.symm_apply_apply x
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_comp
/-- A special case of `f ∘ id = f`, `f` a Localization map. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "A special case of `f ∘ id = f`, `f` a Localization map."]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_id :
f.ofMulEquivOfDom
(show S.map (MulEquiv.refl M).toMonoidHom = S from
Submonoid.ext fun x ↦ ⟨fun ⟨_, hy, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ hy, fun h ↦ ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩) = f := by
ext; rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_id Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_id
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_id AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_id
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* U` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, an
isomorphism `j : M ≃* P` such that `j(S) = T` induces an isomorphism of localizations `N ≃* U`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ U` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, an
isomorphism `j : M ≃+ P` such that `j(S) = T` induces an isomorphism of localizations `N ≃+ U`."]
noncomputable def mulEquivOfMulEquiv (k : LocalizationMap T Q) {j : M ≃* P}
(H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) : N ≃* Q :=
f.mulEquivOfLocalizations <| k.ofMulEquivOfDom H
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq_map_apply {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P}
(H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) (x) :
f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H x =
f.map (fun y : S ↦ show j.toMonoidHom y ∈ T from H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2) k x := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_eq_map_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq_map_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv_eq_map_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv_eq_map_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq_map {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P}
(H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) :
(f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H).toMonoidHom =
f.map (fun y : S ↦ show j.toMonoidHom y ∈ T from H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2) k := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_eq_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq_map
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv_eq_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv_eq_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P} (H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T)
(x) :
f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H (f.toMap x) = k.toMap (j x) :=
f.map_eq (fun y : S ↦ H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2) _
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mulEquivOfMulEquiv_mk' {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P} (H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T)
(x y) :
f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H (f.mk' x y) = k.mk' (j x) ⟨j y, H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2⟩ :=
f.map_mk' (fun y : S ↦ H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2) _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv_apply {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P}
(H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H)).toMap x = k.toMap (j x) :=
ext_iff.1 (f.mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv (k.ofMulEquivOfDom H)) x
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_add_equiv_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.of_addEquivOfAddEquiv_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P} (H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H)).toMap = k.toMap.comp j.toMonoidHom :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv_apply H
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_add_equiv AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.of_addEquivOfAddEquiv
@[to_additive]
theorem toMap_injective_iff (f : LocalizationMap S N) :
Injective (LocalizationMap.toMap f) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ S → IsLeftRegular x := by
rw [Injective]
constructor <;> intro h
· intro x hx y z hyz
simp_rw [LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists] at h
apply (fun y z _ => h) y z x
lift x to S using hx
use x
· intro a b hab
rw [LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists] at hab
obtain ⟨c,hc⟩ := hab
apply (fun x a => h a) c (SetLike.coe_mem c) hc
end LocalizationMap
end Submonoid
namespace Localization
variable (S)
/-- Natural homomorphism sending `x : M`, `M` a `CommMonoid`, to the equivalence class of
`(x, 1)` in the Localization of `M` at a Submonoid. -/
@[to_additive
"Natural homomorphism sending `x : M`, `M` an `AddCommMonoid`, to the equivalence class of
`(x, 0)` in the Localization of `M` at a Submonoid."]
def monoidOf : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S (Localization S) :=
{ (r S).mk'.comp <| MonoidHom.inl M
S with
toFun := fun x ↦ mk x 1
map_one' := mk_one
map_mul' := fun x y ↦ by dsimp only; rw [mk_mul, mul_one]
map_units' := fun y ↦
isUnit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨mk 1 y, by dsimp only; rw [mk_mul, mul_one, one_mul, mk_self]⟩
surj' := fun z ↦ induction_on z fun x ↦
⟨x, by dsimp only; rw [mk_mul, mul_comm x.fst, ← mk_mul, mk_self, one_mul]⟩
exists_of_eq := fun x y ↦ Iff.mp <|
mk_eq_mk_iff.trans <|
r_iff_exists.trans <|
show (∃ c : S, ↑c * (1 * x) = c * (1 * y)) ↔ _ by rw [one_mul, one_mul] }
#align localization.monoid_of Localization.monoidOf
#align add_localization.add_monoid_of AddLocalization.addMonoidOf
variable {S}
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk (x) : mk x 1 = (monoidOf S).toMap x := rfl
#align localization.mk_one_eq_monoid_of_mk Localization.mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk
#align add_localization.mk_zero_eq_add_monoid_of_mk AddLocalization.mk_zero_eq_addMonoidOf_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply (x y) : mk x y = (monoidOf S).mk' x y :=
show _ = _ * _ from
(Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv_right (monoidOf S).map_units _ _ _).2 <| by
rw [← mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk, ← mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk, mk_mul x y y 1, mul_comm y 1]
conv => rhs; rw [← mul_one 1]; rw [← mul_one x]
exact mk_eq_mk_iff.2 (Con.symm _ <| (Localization.r S).mul (Con.refl _ (x, 1)) <| one_rel _)
#align localization.mk_eq_monoid_of_mk'_apply Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply
#align add_localization.mk_eq_add_monoid_of_mk'_apply AddLocalization.mk_eq_addMonoidOf_mk'_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_eq_monoidOf_mk' : mk = (monoidOf S).mk' :=
funext fun _ ↦ funext fun _ ↦ mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply _ _
#align localization.mk_eq_monoid_of_mk' Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'
#align add_localization.mk_eq_add_monoid_of_mk' AddLocalization.mk_eq_addMonoidOf_mk'
universe u
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOn_mk' {p : Sort u} (f : M → S → p) (H) (a : M) (b : S) :
liftOn ((monoidOf S).mk' a b) f H = f a b := by rw [← mk_eq_monoidOf_mk', liftOn_mk]
#align localization.lift_on_mk' Localization.liftOn_mk'
#align add_localization.lift_on_mk' AddLocalization.liftOn_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOn₂_mk' {p : Sort*} (f : M → S → M → S → p) (H) (a c : M) (b d : S) :
liftOn₂ ((monoidOf S).mk' a b) ((monoidOf S).mk' c d) f H = f a b c d := by
rw [← mk_eq_monoidOf_mk', liftOn₂_mk]
#align localization.lift_on₂_mk' Localization.liftOn₂_mk'
#align add_localization.lift_on₂_mk' AddLocalization.liftOn₂_mk'
variable (f : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S N)
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S`, we get an isomorphism between
the Localization of `M` at `S` as a quotient type and `N`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S`, we get an isomorphism between
the Localization of `M` at `S` as a quotient type and `N`."]
noncomputable def mulEquivOfQuotient (f : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S N) : Localization S ≃* N :=
(monoidOf S).mulEquivOfLocalizations f
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient
variable {f}
-- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_apply (x) : mulEquivOfQuotient f x = (monoidOf S).lift f.map_units x :=
rfl
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient_apply Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient_apply
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient_apply AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_mk' (x y) : mulEquivOfQuotient f ((monoidOf S).mk' x y) = f.mk' x y :=
(monoidOf S).lift_mk' _ _ _
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient_mk' Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient_mk'
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient_mk' AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_mk (x y) : mulEquivOfQuotient f (mk x y) = f.mk' x y := by
rw [mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply]; exact mulEquivOfQuotient_mk' _ _
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient_mk Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient_mk
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient_mk AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient_mk
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/MonoidLocalization.lean | 1,782 | 1,783 | theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_monoidOf (x) :
mulEquivOfQuotient f ((monoidOf S).toMap x) = f.toMap x := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
#align_import number_theory.ramification_inertia from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"039a089d2a4b93c761b234f3e5f5aeb752bac60f"
/-!
# Ramification index and inertia degree
Given `P : Ideal S` lying over `p : Ideal R` for the ring extension `f : R →+* S`
(assuming `P` and `p` are prime or maximal where needed),
the **ramification index** `Ideal.ramificationIdx f p P` is the multiplicity of `P` in `map f p`,
and the **inertia degree** `Ideal.inertiaDeg f p P` is the degree of the field extension
`(S / P) : (R / p)`.
## Main results
The main theorem `Ideal.sum_ramification_inertia` states that for all coprime `P` lying over `p`,
`Σ P, ramification_idx f p P * inertia_deg f p P` equals the degree of the field extension
`Frac(S) : Frac(R)`.
## Implementation notes
Often the above theory is set up in the case where:
* `R` is the ring of integers of a number field `K`,
* `L` is a finite separable extension of `K`,
* `S` is the integral closure of `R` in `L`,
* `p` and `P` are maximal ideals,
* `P` is an ideal lying over `p`
We will try to relax the above hypotheses as much as possible.
## Notation
In this file, `e` stands for the ramification index and `f` for the inertia degree of `P` over `p`,
leaving `p` and `P` implicit.
-/
namespace Ideal
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
variable {S : Type v} [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S)
variable (p : Ideal R) (P : Ideal S)
open FiniteDimensional
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
section DecEq
open scoped Classical
/-- The ramification index of `P` over `p` is the largest exponent `n` such that
`p` is contained in `P^n`.
In particular, if `p` is not contained in `P^n`, then the ramification index is 0.
If there is no largest such `n` (e.g. because `p = ⊥`), then `ramificationIdx` is
defined to be 0.
-/
noncomputable def ramificationIdx : ℕ := sSup {n | map f p ≤ P ^ n}
#align ideal.ramification_idx Ideal.ramificationIdx
variable {f p P}
theorem ramificationIdx_eq_find (h : ∃ n, ∀ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ n) :
ramificationIdx f p P = Nat.find h :=
Nat.sSup_def h
#align ideal.ramification_idx_eq_find Ideal.ramificationIdx_eq_find
theorem ramificationIdx_eq_zero (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k ∧ n < k) :
ramificationIdx f p P = 0 :=
dif_neg (by push_neg; exact h)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_eq_zero Ideal.ramificationIdx_eq_zero
theorem ramificationIdx_spec {n : ℕ} (hle : map f p ≤ P ^ n) (hgt : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ (n + 1)) :
ramificationIdx f p P = n := by
let Q : ℕ → Prop := fun m => ∀ k : ℕ, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ m
have : Q n := by
intro k hk
refine le_of_not_lt fun hnk => ?_
exact hgt (hk.trans (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hnk))
rw [ramificationIdx_eq_find ⟨n, this⟩]
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_min' _ this) (le_of_not_gt fun h : Nat.find _ < n => ?_)
obtain this' := Nat.find_spec ⟨n, this⟩
exact h.not_le (this' _ hle)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_spec Ideal.ramificationIdx_spec
theorem ramificationIdx_lt {n : ℕ} (hgt : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ n) : ramificationIdx f p P < n := by
cases' n with n n
· simp at hgt
· rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff]
have : ∀ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ n := by
refine fun k hk => le_of_not_lt fun hnk => ?_
exact hgt (hk.trans (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hnk))
rw [ramificationIdx_eq_find ⟨n, this⟩]
exact Nat.find_min' ⟨n, this⟩ this
#align ideal.ramification_idx_lt Ideal.ramificationIdx_lt
@[simp]
theorem ramificationIdx_bot : ramificationIdx f ⊥ P = 0 :=
dif_neg <| not_exists.mpr fun n hn => n.lt_succ_self.not_le (hn _ (by simp))
#align ideal.ramification_idx_bot Ideal.ramificationIdx_bot
@[simp]
theorem ramificationIdx_of_not_le (h : ¬map f p ≤ P) : ramificationIdx f p P = 0 :=
ramificationIdx_spec (by simp) (by simpa using h)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_of_not_le Ideal.ramificationIdx_of_not_le
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/RamificationInertia.lean | 116 | 118 | theorem ramificationIdx_ne_zero {e : ℕ} (he : e ≠ 0) (hle : map f p ≤ P ^ e)
(hnle : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ (e + 1)) : ramificationIdx f p P ≠ 0 := by |
rwa [ramificationIdx_spec hle hnle]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuyang Zhao. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.mv_polynomial.tower from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bb168510ef455e9280a152e7f31673cabd3d7496"
/-!
# Algebra towers for multivariate polynomial
This file proves some basic results about the algebra tower structure for the type
`MvPolynomial σ R`.
This structure itself is provided elsewhere as `MvPolynomial.isScalarTower`
When you update this file, you can also try to make a corresponding update in
`RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower`.
-/
variable (R A B : Type*) {σ : Type*}
namespace MvPolynomial
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra A B] [Algebra R B]
variable [IsScalarTower R A B]
variable {R B}
theorem aeval_map_algebraMap (x : σ → B) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval x (map (algebraMap R A) p) = aeval x p := by
rw [aeval_def, aeval_def, eval₂_map, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq R A B]
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_map_algebra_map MvPolynomial.aeval_map_algebraMap
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra A B] [Algebra R B] [IsScalarTower R A B]
variable {R A}
theorem aeval_algebraMap_apply (x : σ → A) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval (algebraMap A B ∘ x) p = algebraMap A B (MvPolynomial.aeval x p) := by
rw [aeval_def, aeval_def, ← coe_eval₂Hom, ← coe_eval₂Hom, map_eval₂Hom, ←
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
-- Porting note: added
simp only [Function.comp]
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_algebra_map_apply MvPolynomial.aeval_algebraMap_apply
theorem aeval_algebraMap_eq_zero_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors A B] [Nontrivial B] (x : σ → A)
(p : MvPolynomial σ R) : aeval (algebraMap A B ∘ x) p = 0 ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_algebraMap_apply, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_eq_zero,
iff_false_intro (one_ne_zero' B), or_false_iff]
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_algebra_map_eq_zero_iff MvPolynomial.aeval_algebraMap_eq_zero_iff
theorem aeval_algebraMap_eq_zero_iff_of_injective {x : σ → A} {p : MvPolynomial σ R}
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap A B)) :
aeval (algebraMap A B ∘ x) p = 0 ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_algebraMap_apply, ← (algebraMap A B).map_zero, h.eq_iff]
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_algebra_map_eq_zero_iff_of_injective MvPolynomial.aeval_algebraMap_eq_zero_iff_of_injective
end CommSemiring
end MvPolynomial
namespace Subalgebra
open MvPolynomial
section CommSemiring
variable {R A} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/Tower.lean | 81 | 82 | theorem mvPolynomial_aeval_coe (S : Subalgebra R A) (x : σ → S) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval (fun i => (x i : A)) p = aeval x p := by | convert aeval_algebraMap_apply A x p
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Multiset
#align_import data.nat.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
/-!
# Finite intervals of naturals
This file proves that `ℕ` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
## TODO
Some lemmas can be generalized using `OrderedGroup`, `CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid` or `SuccOrder`
and subsequently be moved upstream to `Order.Interval.Finset`.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists Ring
open Finset Nat
variable (a b c : ℕ)
namespace Nat
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℕ where
finsetIcc a b := ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIco a b := ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIoc a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIoo a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
theorem Icc_eq_range' : Icc a b = ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Icc_eq_range' Nat.Icc_eq_range'
theorem Ico_eq_range' : Ico a b = ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ico_eq_range' Nat.Ico_eq_range'
theorem Ioc_eq_range' : Ioc a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ioc_eq_range' Nat.Ioc_eq_range'
theorem Ioo_eq_range' : Ioo a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ioo_eq_range' Nat.Ioo_eq_range'
theorem uIcc_eq_range' :
uIcc a b = ⟨List.range' (min a b) (max a b + 1 - min a b), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ := rfl
#align nat.uIcc_eq_range' Nat.uIcc_eq_range'
theorem Iio_eq_range : Iio = range := by
ext b x
rw [mem_Iio, mem_range]
#align nat.Iio_eq_range Nat.Iio_eq_range
@[simp]
theorem Ico_zero_eq_range : Ico 0 = range := by rw [← Nat.bot_eq_zero, ← Iio_eq_Ico, Iio_eq_range]
#align nat.Ico_zero_eq_range Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range
lemma range_eq_Icc_zero_sub_one (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0): range n = Icc 0 (n - 1) := by
ext b
simp_all only [mem_Icc, zero_le, true_and, mem_range]
exact lt_iff_le_pred (zero_lt_of_ne_zero hn)
theorem _root_.Finset.range_eq_Ico : range = Ico 0 :=
Ico_zero_eq_range.symm
#align finset.range_eq_Ico Finset.range_eq_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : (Icc a b).card = b + 1 - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Icc Nat.card_Icc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : (Ico a b).card = b - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ico Nat.card_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : (Ioc a b).card = b - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ioc Nat.card_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : (Ioo a b).card = b - a - 1 :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ioo Nat.card_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : (uIcc a b).card = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_Icc _ _).trans $ by rw [← Int.natCast_inj, sup_eq_max, inf_eq_min, Int.ofNat_sub] <;> omega
#align nat.card_uIcc Nat.card_uIcc
@[simp]
lemma card_Iic : (Iic b).card = b + 1 := by rw [Iic_eq_Icc, card_Icc, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
#align nat.card_Iic Nat.card_Iic
@[simp]
theorem card_Iio : (Iio b).card = b := by rw [Iio_eq_Ico, card_Ico, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
#align nat.card_Iio Nat.card_Iio
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIcc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Icc]
#align nat.card_fintype_Icc Nat.card_fintypeIcc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIco : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = b - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ico]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ico Nat.card_fintypeIco
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = b - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ioc]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ioc Nat.card_fintypeIoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ioo]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ioo Nat.card_fintypeIoo
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIic : Fintype.card (Set.Iic b) = b + 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Iic]
#align nat.card_fintype_Iic Nat.card_fintypeIic
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIio : Fintype.card (Set.Iio b) = b := by rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Iio]
#align nat.card_fintype_Iio Nat.card_fintypeIio
-- TODO@Yaël: Generalize all the following lemmas to `SuccOrder`
theorem Icc_succ_left : Icc a.succ b = Ioc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff]
#align nat.Icc_succ_left Nat.Icc_succ_left
theorem Ico_succ_right : Ico a b.succ = Icc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Icc, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_right Nat.Ico_succ_right
theorem Ico_succ_left : Ico a.succ b = Ioo a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioo, succ_le_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_left Nat.Ico_succ_left
theorem Icc_pred_right {b : ℕ} (h : 0 < b) : Icc a (b - 1) = Ico a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ico, lt_iff_le_pred h]
#align nat.Icc_pred_right Nat.Icc_pred_right
theorem Ico_succ_succ : Ico a.succ b.succ = Ioc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_succ Nat.Ico_succ_succ
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_singleton : Ico a (a + 1) = {a} := by rw [Ico_succ_right, Icc_self]
#align nat.Ico_succ_singleton Nat.Ico_succ_singleton
@[simp]
theorem Ico_pred_singleton {a : ℕ} (h : 0 < a) : Ico (a - 1) a = {a - 1} := by
rw [← Icc_pred_right _ h, Icc_self]
#align nat.Ico_pred_singleton Nat.Ico_pred_singleton
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Nat.lean | 183 | 183 | theorem Ioc_succ_singleton : Ioc b (b + 1) = {b + 1} := by | rw [← Nat.Icc_succ_left, Icc_self]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.ZPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.integral.circle_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# Integral over a circle in `ℂ`
In this file we define `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` to be the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$ and
prove some properties of this integral. We give definition and prove most lemmas for a function
`f : ℂ → E`, where `E` is a complex Banach space. For this reason,
some lemmas use, e.g., `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` instead of `f z / (z - c)`.
## Main definitions
* `circleMap c R`: the exponential map $θ ↦ c + R e^{θi}$;
* `CircleIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and
radius `R` if `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`;
* `circleIntegral f c R`: the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$;
* `cauchyPowerSeries f c R`: the power series that is equal to
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \oint_{|z-c|=R} \left(\frac{w-c}{z - c}\right)^n \frac{1}{z-c}f(z)\,dz$ at
`w - c`. The coefficients of this power series depend only on `f ∘ circleMap c R`, and the power
series converges to `f w` if `f` is differentiable on the closed ball `Metric.closedBall c R`
and `w` belongs to the corresponding open ball.
## Main statements
* `hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`: for any circle integrable function `f`, the power series
`cauchyPowerSeries f c R`, `R > 0`, converges to the Cauchy integral
`(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z` on the open disc `Metric.ball c R`;
* `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, and
`circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`: formulas for `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n`,
`n : ℤ`. These lemmas cover the following cases:
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`: in this case the
function is not integrable, so the integral is equal to its default value (zero);
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, `n ≠ -1`: in the cases not covered by the previous
lemma, we have `(z - w) ^ n = ((z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))'`, thus the integral equals zero;
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`, `n = -1`, `|w - c| < R`: in this case the
integral is equal to `2πi`.
The case `n = -1`, `|w -c| > R` is not covered by these lemmas. While it is possible to construct
an explicit primitive, it is easier to apply Cauchy theorem, so we postpone the proof till we have
this theorem (see #10000).
## Notation
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$.
## Tags
integral, circle, Cauchy integral
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open scoped Real NNReal Interval Pointwise Topology
open Complex MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Metric Function Set Filter Asymptotics
/-!
### `circleMap`, a parametrization of a circle
-/
/-- The exponential map $θ ↦ c + R e^{θi}$. The range of this map is the circle in `ℂ` with center
`c` and radius `|R|`. -/
def circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : ℝ → ℂ := fun θ => c + R * exp (θ * I)
#align circle_map circleMap
/-- `circleMap` is `2π`-periodic. -/
theorem periodic_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Periodic (circleMap c R) (2 * π) := fun θ => by
simp [circleMap, add_mul, exp_periodic _]
#align periodic_circle_map periodic_circleMap
theorem Set.Countable.preimage_circleMap {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (c : ℂ) {R : ℝ}
(hR : R ≠ 0) : (circleMap c R ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
show (((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) ⁻¹' ((· * I) ⁻¹'
(exp ⁻¹' ((R * ·) ⁻¹' ((c + ·) ⁻¹' s))))).Countable from
(((hs.preimage (add_right_injective _)).preimage <|
mul_right_injective₀ <| ofReal_ne_zero.2 hR).preimage_cexp.preimage <|
mul_left_injective₀ I_ne_zero).preimage ofReal_injective
#align set.countable.preimage_circle_map Set.Countable.preimage_circleMap
@[simp]
theorem circleMap_sub_center (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : circleMap c R θ - c = circleMap 0 R θ := by
simp [circleMap]
#align circle_map_sub_center circleMap_sub_center
theorem circleMap_zero (R θ : ℝ) : circleMap 0 R θ = R * exp (θ * I) :=
zero_add _
#align circle_map_zero circleMap_zero
@[simp]
theorem abs_circleMap_zero (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : abs (circleMap 0 R θ) = |R| := by simp [circleMap]
#align abs_circle_map_zero abs_circleMap_zero
theorem circleMap_mem_sphere' (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : circleMap c R θ ∈ sphere c |R| := by simp
#align circle_map_mem_sphere' circleMap_mem_sphere'
theorem circleMap_mem_sphere (c : ℂ) {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R) (θ : ℝ) :
circleMap c R θ ∈ sphere c R := by
simpa only [_root_.abs_of_nonneg hR] using circleMap_mem_sphere' c R θ
#align circle_map_mem_sphere circleMap_mem_sphere
theorem circleMap_mem_closedBall (c : ℂ) {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R) (θ : ℝ) :
circleMap c R θ ∈ closedBall c R :=
sphere_subset_closedBall (circleMap_mem_sphere c hR θ)
#align circle_map_mem_closed_ball circleMap_mem_closedBall
theorem circleMap_not_mem_ball (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : circleMap c R θ ∉ ball c R := by
simp [dist_eq, le_abs_self]
#align circle_map_not_mem_ball circleMap_not_mem_ball
theorem circleMap_ne_mem_ball {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {w : ℂ} (hw : w ∈ ball c R) (θ : ℝ) :
circleMap c R θ ≠ w :=
(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hw (circleMap_not_mem_ball _ _ _)).symm
#align circle_map_ne_mem_ball circleMap_ne_mem_ball
/-- The range of `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : range (circleMap c R) = sphere c |R| :=
calc
range (circleMap c R) = c +ᵥ R • range fun θ : ℝ => exp (θ * I) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [← image_vadd, ← image_smul, ← range_comp,
vadd_eq_add, circleMap, Function.comp_def, real_smul]
_ = sphere c |R| := by
rw [Complex.range_exp_mul_I, smul_sphere R 0 zero_le_one]
simp
#align range_circle_map range_circleMap
/-- The image of `(0, 2π]` under `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem image_circleMap_Ioc (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : circleMap c R '' Ioc 0 (2 * π) = sphere c |R| := by
rw [← range_circleMap, ← (periodic_circleMap c R).image_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos 0, zero_add]
#align image_circle_map_Ioc image_circleMap_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem circleMap_eq_center_iff {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} : circleMap c R θ = c ↔ R = 0 := by
simp [circleMap, exp_ne_zero]
#align circle_map_eq_center_iff circleMap_eq_center_iff
@[simp]
theorem circleMap_zero_radius (c : ℂ) : circleMap c 0 = const ℝ c :=
funext fun _ => circleMap_eq_center_iff.2 rfl
#align circle_map_zero_radius circleMap_zero_radius
theorem circleMap_ne_center {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) {θ : ℝ} : circleMap c R θ ≠ c :=
mt circleMap_eq_center_iff.1 hR
#align circle_map_ne_center circleMap_ne_center
theorem hasDerivAt_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (circleMap c R) (circleMap 0 R θ * I) θ := by
simpa only [mul_assoc, one_mul, ofRealCLM_apply, circleMap, ofReal_one, zero_add]
using (((ofRealCLM.hasDerivAt (x := θ)).mul_const I).cexp.const_mul (R : ℂ)).const_add c
#align has_deriv_at_circle_map hasDerivAt_circleMap
/- TODO: prove `ContDiff ℝ (circleMap c R)`. This needs a version of `ContDiff.mul`
for multiplication in a normed algebra over the base field. -/
theorem differentiable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (circleMap c R) := fun θ =>
(hasDerivAt_circleMap c R θ).differentiableAt
#align differentiable_circle_map differentiable_circleMap
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Continuous (circleMap c R) :=
(differentiable_circleMap c R).continuous
#align continuous_circle_map continuous_circleMap
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Measurable (circleMap c R) :=
(continuous_circleMap c R).measurable
#align measurable_circle_map measurable_circleMap
@[simp]
theorem deriv_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : deriv (circleMap c R) θ = circleMap 0 R θ * I :=
(hasDerivAt_circleMap _ _ _).deriv
#align deriv_circle_map deriv_circleMap
theorem deriv_circleMap_eq_zero_iff {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} :
deriv (circleMap c R) θ = 0 ↔ R = 0 := by simp [I_ne_zero]
#align deriv_circle_map_eq_zero_iff deriv_circleMap_eq_zero_iff
theorem deriv_circleMap_ne_zero {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) :
deriv (circleMap c R) θ ≠ 0 :=
mt deriv_circleMap_eq_zero_iff.1 hR
#align deriv_circle_map_ne_zero deriv_circleMap_ne_zero
theorem lipschitzWith_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : LipschitzWith (Real.nnabs R) (circleMap c R) :=
lipschitzWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le (differentiable_circleMap _ _) fun θ =>
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by simp
#align lipschitz_with_circle_map lipschitzWith_circleMap
theorem continuous_circleMap_inv {R : ℝ} {z w : ℂ} (hw : w ∈ ball z R) :
Continuous fun θ => (circleMap z R θ - w)⁻¹ := by
have : ∀ θ, circleMap z R θ - w ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [sub_ne_zero]
exact fun θ => circleMap_ne_mem_ball hw θ
-- Porting note: was `continuity`
exact Continuous.inv₀ (by continuity) this
#align continuous_circle_map_inv continuous_circleMap_inv
/-!
### Integrability of a function on a circle
-/
/-- We say that a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and radius `R` if
the function `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`.
Note that the actual function used in the definition of `circleIntegral` is
`(deriv (circleMap c R) θ) • f (circleMap c R θ)`. Integrability of this function is equivalent
to integrability of `f ∘ circleMap c R` whenever `R ≠ 0`. -/
def CircleIntegrable (f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Prop :=
IntervalIntegrable (fun θ : ℝ => f (circleMap c R θ)) volume 0 (2 * π)
#align circle_integrable CircleIntegrable
@[simp]
theorem circleIntegrable_const (a : E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : CircleIntegrable (fun _ => a) c R :=
intervalIntegrable_const
#align circle_integrable_const circleIntegrable_const
namespace CircleIntegrable
variable {f g : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ}
nonrec theorem add (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R) (hg : CircleIntegrable g c R) :
CircleIntegrable (f + g) c R :=
hf.add hg
#align circle_integrable.add CircleIntegrable.add
nonrec theorem neg (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R) : CircleIntegrable (-f) c R :=
hf.neg
#align circle_integrable.neg CircleIntegrable.neg
/-- The function we actually integrate over `[0, 2π]` in the definition of `circleIntegral` is
integrable. -/
theorem out [NormedSpace ℂ E] (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun θ : ℝ => deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)) volume 0
(2 * π) := by
simp only [CircleIntegrable, deriv_circleMap, intervalIntegrable_iff] at *
refine (hf.norm.const_mul |R|).mono' ?_ ?_
· exact ((continuous_circleMap _ _).aestronglyMeasurable.mul_const I).smul hf.aestronglyMeasurable
· simp [norm_smul]
#align circle_integrable.out CircleIntegrable.out
end CircleIntegrable
@[simp]
theorem circleIntegrable_zero_radius {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} : CircleIntegrable f c 0 := by
simp [CircleIntegrable]
#align circle_integrable_zero_radius circleIntegrable_zero_radius
theorem circleIntegrable_iff [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} (R : ℝ) :
CircleIntegrable f c R ↔ IntervalIntegrable (fun θ : ℝ =>
deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)) volume 0 (2 * π) := by
by_cases h₀ : R = 0
· simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [h₀, const]
refine ⟨fun h => h.out, fun h => ?_⟩
simp only [CircleIntegrable, intervalIntegrable_iff, deriv_circleMap] at h ⊢
refine (h.norm.const_mul |R|⁻¹).mono' ?_ ?_
· have H : ∀ {θ}, circleMap 0 R θ * I ≠ 0 := fun {θ} => by simp [h₀, I_ne_zero]
simpa only [inv_smul_smul₀ H]
using ((continuous_circleMap 0 R).aestronglyMeasurable.mul_const
I).aemeasurable.inv.aestronglyMeasurable.smul h.aestronglyMeasurable
· simp [norm_smul, h₀]
#align circle_integrable_iff circleIntegrable_iff
theorem ContinuousOn.circleIntegrable' {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (sphere c |R|)) : CircleIntegrable f c R :=
(hf.comp_continuous (continuous_circleMap _ _) (circleMap_mem_sphere' _ _)).intervalIntegrable _ _
#align continuous_on.circle_integrable' ContinuousOn.circleIntegrable'
theorem ContinuousOn.circleIntegrable {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R)
(hf : ContinuousOn f (sphere c R)) : CircleIntegrable f c R :=
ContinuousOn.circleIntegrable' <| (_root_.abs_of_nonneg hR).symm ▸ hf
#align continuous_on.circle_integrable ContinuousOn.circleIntegrable
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01: the simpNF linter now times out on this lemma. -/
/-- The function `fun z ↦ (z - w) ^ n`, `n : ℤ`, is circle integrable on the circle with center `c`
and radius `|R|` if and only if `R = 0` or `0 ≤ n`, or `w` does not belong to this circle. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem circleIntegrable_sub_zpow_iff {c w : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {n : ℤ} :
CircleIntegrable (fun z => (z - w) ^ n) c R ↔ R = 0 ∨ 0 ≤ n ∨ w ∉ sphere c |R| := by
constructor
· intro h; contrapose! h; rcases h with ⟨hR, hn, hw⟩
simp only [circleIntegrable_iff R, deriv_circleMap]
rw [← image_circleMap_Ioc] at hw; rcases hw with ⟨θ, hθ, rfl⟩
replace hθ : θ ∈ [[0, 2 * π]] := Icc_subset_uIcc (Ioc_subset_Icc_self hθ)
refine not_intervalIntegrable_of_sub_inv_isBigO_punctured ?_ Real.two_pi_pos.ne hθ
set f : ℝ → ℂ := fun θ' => circleMap c R θ' - circleMap c R θ
have : ∀ᶠ θ' in 𝓝[≠] θ, f θ' ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) 1 \ {0} := by
suffices ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] circleMap c R θ, z - circleMap c R θ ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) 1 \ {0} from
((differentiable_circleMap c R θ).hasDerivAt.tendsto_punctured_nhds
(deriv_circleMap_ne_zero hR)).eventually this
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (ball_mem_nhds _ zero_lt_one)]
simp_all [dist_eq, sub_eq_zero]
refine (((hasDerivAt_circleMap c R θ).isBigO_sub.mono inf_le_left).inv_rev
(this.mono fun θ' h₁ h₂ => absurd h₂ h₁.2)).trans ?_
refine IsBigO.of_bound |R|⁻¹ (this.mono fun θ' hθ' => ?_)
set x := abs (f θ')
suffices x⁻¹ ≤ x ^ n by
simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left₀, abs_eq_zero.not.2 hR, norm_eq_abs, map_inv₀,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, map_mul, abs_circleMap_zero, abs_I, mul_one, abs_zpow, Ne,
not_false_iff] using this
have : x ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 := by simpa [x, and_comm] using hθ'
rw [← zpow_neg_one]
refine (zpow_strictAnti this.1 this.2).le_iff_le.2 (Int.lt_add_one_iff.1 ?_); exact hn
· rintro (rfl | H)
exacts [circleIntegrable_zero_radius,
((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).zpow₀ _ fun z hz =>
H.symm.imp_left fun (hw : w ∉ sphere c |R|) =>
sub_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hz hw).circleIntegrable']
#align circle_integrable_sub_zpow_iff circleIntegrable_sub_zpow_iff
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem circleIntegrable_sub_inv_iff {c w : ℂ} {R : ℝ} :
CircleIntegrable (fun z => (z - w)⁻¹) c R ↔ R = 0 ∨ w ∉ sphere c |R| := by
simp only [← zpow_neg_one, circleIntegrable_sub_zpow_iff]; norm_num
#align circle_integrable_sub_inv_iff circleIntegrable_sub_inv_iff
variable [NormedSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]
/-- Definition for $\oint_{|z-c|=R} f(z)\,dz$. -/
def circleIntegral (f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : E :=
∫ θ : ℝ in (0)..2 * π, deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)
#align circle_integral circleIntegral
notation3 "∮ "(...)" in ""C("c", "R")"", "r:(scoped f => circleIntegral f c R) => r
theorem circleIntegral_def_Icc (f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∫ θ in Icc 0 (2 * π),
deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ) := by
rw [circleIntegral, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le Real.two_pi_pos.le,
Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioc_ae_eq_Icc]
#align circle_integral_def_Icc circleIntegral_def_Icc
namespace circleIntegral
@[simp]
theorem integral_radius_zero (f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) : (∮ z in C(c, 0), f z) = 0 := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [circleIntegral, const]
#align circle_integral.integral_radius_zero circleIntegral.integral_radius_zero
theorem integral_congr {f g : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R) (h : EqOn f g (sphere c R)) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), g z :=
intervalIntegral.integral_congr fun θ _ => by simp only [h (circleMap_mem_sphere _ hR _)]
#align circle_integral.integral_congr circleIntegral.integral_congr
theorem integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul (f : ℂ → E) (c w : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • (z - w) • f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), f z := by
rcases eq_or_ne R 0 with (rfl | hR); · simp only [integral_radius_zero]
have : (circleMap c R ⁻¹' {w}).Countable := (countable_singleton _).preimage_circleMap c hR
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae ((this.ae_not_mem _).mono fun θ hθ _' => ?_)
change circleMap c R θ ≠ w at hθ
simp only [inv_smul_smul₀ (sub_ne_zero.2 <| hθ)]
#align circle_integral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul
theorem integral_undef {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hf : ¬CircleIntegrable f c R) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = 0 :=
intervalIntegral.integral_undef (mt (circleIntegrable_iff R).mpr hf)
#align circle_integral.integral_undef circleIntegral.integral_undef
theorem integral_sub {f g : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R)
(hg : CircleIntegrable g c R) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z - g z) = (∮ z in C(c, R), f z) - ∮ z in C(c, R), g z := by
simp only [circleIntegral, smul_sub, intervalIntegral.integral_sub hf.out hg.out]
#align circle_integral.integral_sub circleIntegral.integral_sub
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const' {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ z ∈ sphere c |R|, ‖f z‖ ≤ C) : ‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ 2 * π * |R| * C :=
calc
‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ |R| * C * |2 * π - 0| :=
intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const fun θ _ =>
calc
‖deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)‖ = |R| * ‖f (circleMap c R θ)‖ := by
simp [norm_smul]
_ ≤ |R| * C :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hf _ <| circleMap_mem_sphere' _ _ _) (abs_nonneg _)
_ = 2 * π * |R| * C := by rw [sub_zero, _root_.abs_of_pos Real.two_pi_pos]; ac_rfl
#align circle_integral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const' circleIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const'
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R C : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R)
(hf : ∀ z ∈ sphere c R, ‖f z‖ ≤ C) : ‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ 2 * π * R * C :=
have : |R| = R := abs_of_nonneg hR
calc
‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ 2 * π * |R| * C := norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const' <| by rwa [this]
_ = 2 * π * R * C := by rw [this]
#align circle_integral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const circleIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleIntegral.lean | 411 | 416 | theorem norm_two_pi_i_inv_smul_integral_le_of_norm_le_const {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R C : ℝ}
(hR : 0 ≤ R) (hf : ∀ z ∈ sphere c R, ‖f z‖ ≤ C) :
‖(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ R * C := by |
have : ‖(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹‖ = (2 * π)⁻¹ := by simp [Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [norm_smul, this, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_le_iff Real.two_pi_pos, mul_comm (R * C), ← mul_assoc]
exact norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const hR hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Ineq
#align_import group_theory.perm.sign from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# Sign of a permutation
The main definition of this file is `Equiv.Perm.sign`,
associating a `ℤˣ` sign with a permutation.
Other lemmas have been moved to `Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fintype`
-/
universe u v
open Equiv Function Fintype Finset
variable {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] {β : Type v}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-- `modSwap i j` contains permutations up to swapping `i` and `j`.
We use this to partition permutations in `Matrix.det_zero_of_row_eq`, such that each partition
sums up to `0`.
-/
def modSwap (i j : α) : Setoid (Perm α) :=
⟨fun σ τ => σ = τ ∨ σ = swap i j * τ, fun σ => Or.inl (refl σ), fun {σ τ} h =>
Or.casesOn h (fun h => Or.inl h.symm) fun h => Or.inr (by rw [h, swap_mul_self_mul]),
fun {σ τ υ} hστ hτυ => by
cases' hστ with hστ hστ <;> cases' hτυ with hτυ hτυ <;> try rw [hστ, hτυ, swap_mul_self_mul] <;>
simp [hστ, hτυ] -- Porting note: should close goals, but doesn't
· simp [hστ, hτυ]
· simp [hστ, hτυ]
· simp [hστ, hτυ]⟩
#align equiv.perm.mod_swap Equiv.Perm.modSwap
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (i j : α) :
DecidableRel (modSwap i j).r :=
fun _ _ => Or.decidable
/-- Given a list `l : List α` and a permutation `f : Perm α` such that the nonfixed points of `f`
are in `l`, recursively factors `f` as a product of transpositions. -/
def swapFactorsAux :
∀ (l : List α) (f : Perm α),
(∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) → { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g }
| [] => fun f h =>
⟨[],
Equiv.ext fun x => by
rw [List.prod_nil]
exact (Classical.not_not.1 (mt h (List.not_mem_nil _))).symm,
by simp⟩
| x::l => fun f h =>
if hfx : x = f x then
swapFactorsAux l f fun {y} hy =>
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem (fun h : y = x => by simp [h, hfx.symm] at hy) (h hy)
else
let m :=
swapFactorsAux l (swap x (f x) * f) fun {y} hy =>
have : f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h this.1)
⟨swap x (f x)::m.1, by
rw [List.prod_cons, m.2.1, ← mul_assoc, mul_def (swap x (f x)), swap_swap, ← one_def,
one_mul],
fun {g} hg => ((List.mem_cons).1 hg).elim (fun h => ⟨x, f x, hfx, h⟩) (m.2.2 _)⟩
#align equiv.perm.swap_factors_aux Equiv.Perm.swapFactorsAux
/-- `swapFactors` represents a permutation as a product of a list of transpositions.
The representation is non unique and depends on the linear order structure.
For types without linear order `truncSwapFactors` can be used. -/
def swapFactors [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] (f : Perm α) :
{ l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g } :=
swapFactorsAux ((@univ α _).sort (· ≤ ·)) f fun {_ _} => (mem_sort _).2 (mem_univ _)
#align equiv.perm.swap_factors Equiv.Perm.swapFactors
/-- This computably represents the fact that any permutation can be represented as the product of
a list of transpositions. -/
def truncSwapFactors [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) :
Trunc { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g } :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (@univ α _).1 (fun l h => Trunc.mk (swapFactorsAux l f (h _)))
(show ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ (@univ α _).1 from fun _ _ => mem_univ _)
#align equiv.perm.trunc_swap_factors Equiv.Perm.truncSwapFactors
/-- An induction principle for permutations. If `P` holds for the identity permutation, and
is preserved under composition with a non-trivial swap, then `P` holds for all permutations. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem swap_induction_on [Finite α] {P : Perm α → Prop} (f : Perm α) :
P 1 → (∀ f x y, x ≠ y → P f → P (swap x y * f)) → P f := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
cases' (truncSwapFactors f).out with l hl
induction' l with g l ih generalizing f
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [hl.left.symm, List.prod_nil, forall_true_iff]
· intro h1 hmul_swap
rcases hl.2 g (by simp) with ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [← hl.1, List.prod_cons, hxy.2]
exact
hmul_swap _ _ _ hxy.1
(ih _ ⟨rfl, fun v hv => hl.2 _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hv)⟩ h1 hmul_swap)
#align equiv.perm.swap_induction_on Equiv.Perm.swap_induction_on
theorem closure_isSwap [Finite α] : Subgroup.closure { σ : Perm α | IsSwap σ } = ⊤ := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
refine eq_top_iff.mpr fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := Subtype.mem (truncSwapFactors x).out
rw [← h1]
exact Subgroup.list_prod_mem _ fun y hy => Subgroup.subset_closure (h2 y hy)
#align equiv.perm.closure_is_swap Equiv.Perm.closure_isSwap
/-- Like `swap_induction_on`, but with the composition on the right of `f`.
An induction principle for permutations. If `P` holds for the identity permutation, and
is preserved under composition with a non-trivial swap, then `P` holds for all permutations. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem swap_induction_on' [Finite α] {P : Perm α → Prop} (f : Perm α) :
P 1 → (∀ f x y, x ≠ y → P f → P (f * swap x y)) → P f := fun h1 IH =>
inv_inv f ▸ swap_induction_on f⁻¹ h1 fun f => IH f⁻¹
#align equiv.perm.swap_induction_on' Equiv.Perm.swap_induction_on'
theorem isConj_swap {w x y z : α} (hwx : w ≠ x) (hyz : y ≠ z) : IsConj (swap w x) (swap y z) :=
isConj_iff.2
(have h :
∀ {y z : α},
y ≠ z → w ≠ z → swap w y * swap x z * swap w x * (swap w y * swap x z)⁻¹ = swap y z :=
fun {y z} hyz hwz => by
rw [mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, swap_inv, mul_assoc (swap w y), mul_assoc (swap w y), ←
mul_assoc _ (swap x z), swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwx hwz, ← mul_assoc,
swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwz.symm hyz.symm]
if hwz : w = z then
have hwy : w ≠ y := by rw [hwz]; exact hyz.symm
⟨swap w z * swap x y, by rw [swap_comm y z, h hyz.symm hwy]⟩
else ⟨swap w y * swap x z, h hyz hwz⟩)
#align equiv.perm.is_conj_swap Equiv.Perm.isConj_swap
/-- set of all pairs (⟨a, b⟩ : Σ a : fin n, fin n) such that b < a -/
def finPairsLT (n : ℕ) : Finset (Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n) :=
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).sigma fun a => (range a).attachFin fun _ hm => (mem_range.1 hm).trans a.2
#align equiv.perm.fin_pairs_lt Equiv.Perm.finPairsLT
theorem mem_finPairsLT {n : ℕ} {a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n} : a ∈ finPairsLT n ↔ a.2 < a.1 := by
simp only [finPairsLT, Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, true_and_iff, mem_attachFin, mem_range, mem_univ,
mem_sigma]
#align equiv.perm.mem_fin_pairs_lt Equiv.Perm.mem_finPairsLT
/-- `signAux σ` is the sign of a permutation on `Fin n`, defined as the parity of the number of
pairs `(x₁, x₂)` such that `x₂ < x₁` but `σ x₁ ≤ σ x₂` -/
def signAux {n : ℕ} (a : Perm (Fin n)) : ℤˣ :=
∏ x ∈ finPairsLT n, if a x.1 ≤ a x.2 then -1 else 1
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux Equiv.Perm.signAux
@[simp]
theorem signAux_one (n : ℕ) : signAux (1 : Perm (Fin n)) = 1 := by
unfold signAux
conv => rhs; rw [← @Finset.prod_const_one _ _ (finPairsLT n)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun a ha => if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).not_le
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_one Equiv.Perm.signAux_one
/-- `signBijAux f ⟨a, b⟩` returns the pair consisting of `f a` and `f b` in decreasing order. -/
def signBijAux {n : ℕ} (f : Perm (Fin n)) (a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n) : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n :=
if _ : f a.2 < f a.1 then ⟨f a.1, f a.2⟩ else ⟨f a.2, f a.1⟩
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux Equiv.Perm.signBijAux
theorem signBijAux_injOn {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
(finPairsLT n : Set (Σ _, Fin n)).InjOn (signBijAux f) := by
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ hb h
dsimp [signBijAux] at h
rw [Finset.mem_coe, mem_finPairsLT] at *
have : ¬b₁ < b₂ := hb.le.not_lt
split_ifs at h <;>
simp_all [(Equiv.injective f).eq_iff, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff, heq_iff_eq]
· exact absurd this (not_le.mpr ha)
· exact absurd this (not_le.mpr ha)
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_inj Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_injOn
theorem signBijAux_surj {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
∀ a ∈ finPairsLT n, ∃ b ∈ finPairsLT n, signBijAux f b = a :=
fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha =>
if hxa : f⁻¹ a₂ < f⁻¹ a₁ then
⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₁, f⁻¹ a₂⟩, mem_finPairsLT.2 hxa, by
dsimp [signBijAux]
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, if_pos (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha)]⟩
else
⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₂, f⁻¹ a₁⟩,
mem_finPairsLT.2 <|
(le_of_not_gt hxa).lt_of_ne fun h => by
simp [mem_finPairsLT, f⁻¹.injective h, lt_irrefl] at ha, by
dsimp [signBijAux]
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).le.not_lt]⟩
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_surj Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_surj
theorem signBijAux_mem {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
∀ a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n, a ∈ finPairsLT n → signBijAux f a ∈ finPairsLT n :=
fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha => by
unfold signBijAux
split_ifs with h
· exact mem_finPairsLT.2 h
· exact mem_finPairsLT.2
((le_of_not_gt h).lt_of_ne fun h => (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).ne (f.injective h.symm))
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_mem Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_mem
@[simp]
theorem signAux_inv {n : ℕ} (f : Perm (Fin n)) : signAux f⁻¹ = signAux f :=
prod_nbij (signBijAux f⁻¹) signBijAux_mem signBijAux_injOn signBijAux_surj fun ⟨a, b⟩ hab ↦
if h : f⁻¹ b < f⁻¹ a then by
simp_all [signBijAux, dif_pos h, if_neg h.not_le, apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 hab).not_le]
else by
simp_all [signBijAux, if_pos (le_of_not_gt h), dif_neg h, apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
if_pos (mem_finPairsLT.1 hab).le]
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_inv Equiv.Perm.signAux_inv
theorem signAux_mul {n : ℕ} (f g : Perm (Fin n)) : signAux (f * g) = signAux f * signAux g := by
rw [← signAux_inv g]
unfold signAux
rw [← prod_mul_distrib]
refine prod_nbij (signBijAux g) signBijAux_mem signBijAux_injOn signBijAux_surj ?_
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ hab
dsimp only [signBijAux]
rw [mul_apply, mul_apply]
rw [mem_finPairsLT] at hab
by_cases h : g b < g a
· rw [dif_pos h]
simp only [not_le_of_gt hab, mul_one, mul_ite, mul_neg, Perm.inv_apply_self, if_false]
· rw [dif_neg h, inv_apply_self, inv_apply_self, if_pos hab.le]
by_cases h₁ : f (g b) ≤ f (g a)
· have : f (g b) ≠ f (g a) := by
rw [Ne, f.injective.eq_iff, g.injective.eq_iff]
exact ne_of_lt hab
rw [if_pos h₁, if_neg (h₁.lt_of_ne this).not_le]
rfl
· rw [if_neg h₁, if_pos (lt_of_not_ge h₁).le]
rfl
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_mul Equiv.Perm.signAux_mul
private theorem signAux_swap_zero_one' (n : ℕ) : signAux (swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1) = -1 :=
show _ = ∏ x ∈ {(⟨1, 0⟩ : Σ a : Fin (n + 2), Fin (n + 2))},
if (Equiv.swap 0 1) x.1 ≤ swap 0 1 x.2 then (-1 : ℤˣ) else 1 by
refine Eq.symm (prod_subset (fun ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [mem_finPairsLT, Fin.one_pos]) fun a ha₁ ha₂ => ?_)
rcases a with ⟨a₁, a₂⟩
replace ha₁ : a₂ < a₁ := mem_finPairsLT.1 ha₁
dsimp only
rcases a₁.zero_le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· exact absurd a₂.zero_le ha₁.not_le
rcases a₂.zero_le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H')
· simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, mem_singleton, Sigma.mk.inj_iff] at ha₂
have : 1 < a₁ := lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.succ_le_of_lt ha₁)
(Ne.symm (by intro h; apply ha₂; simp [h]))
have h01 : Equiv.swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 0 = 1 := by simp
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H) ha₂, h01, if_neg this.not_le]
· have le : 1 ≤ a₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt H'
have lt : 1 < a₁ := le.trans_lt ha₁
have h01 : Equiv.swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 1 = 0 := by simp only [swap_apply_right]
rcases le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | lt')
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne H.ne' lt.ne', h01, if_neg H.not_le]
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H) (ne_of_gt lt),
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H') (ne_of_gt lt'), if_neg ha₁.not_le]
private theorem signAux_swap_zero_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
signAux (swap (⟨0, lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) hn⟩ : Fin n) ⟨1, lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) hn⟩) =
-1 := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· norm_num at hn
· norm_num at hn
· exact signAux_swap_zero_one' n
theorem signAux_swap : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x y : Fin n} (_hxy : x ≠ y), signAux (swap x y) = -1
| 0, x, y => by intro; exact Fin.elim0 x
| 1, x, y => by
dsimp [signAux, swap, swapCore]
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, not_true, ite_true, le_refl, prod_const,
IsEmpty.forall_iff]
| n + 2, x, y => fun hxy => by
have h2n : 2 ≤ n + 2 := by exact le_add_self
rw [← isConj_iff_eq, ← signAux_swap_zero_one h2n]
exact (MonoidHom.mk' signAux signAux_mul).map_isConj
(isConj_swap hxy (by exact of_decide_eq_true rfl))
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_swap Equiv.Perm.signAux_swap
/-- When the list `l : List α` contains all nonfixed points of the permutation `f : Perm α`,
`signAux2 l f` recursively calculates the sign of `f`. -/
def signAux2 : List α → Perm α → ℤˣ
| [], _ => 1
| x::l, f => if x = f x then signAux2 l f else -signAux2 l (swap x (f x) * f)
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux2 Equiv.Perm.signAux2
theorem signAux_eq_signAux2 {n : ℕ} :
∀ (l : List α) (f : Perm α) (e : α ≃ Fin n) (_h : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l),
signAux ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) = signAux2 l f
| [], f, e, h => by
have : f = 1 := Equiv.ext fun y => Classical.not_not.1 (mt (h y) (List.not_mem_nil _))
rw [this, one_def, Equiv.trans_refl, Equiv.symm_trans_self, ← one_def, signAux_one, signAux2]
| x::l, f, e, h => by
rw [signAux2]
by_cases hfx : x = f x
· rw [if_pos hfx]
exact
signAux_eq_signAux2 l f _ fun y (hy : f y ≠ y) =>
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem (fun h : y = x => by simp [h, hfx.symm] at hy) (h y hy)
· have hy : ∀ y : α, (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y → y ∈ l := fun y hy =>
have : f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h _ this.1)
have : (e.symm.trans (swap x (f x) * f)).trans e =
swap (e x) (e (f x)) * (e.symm.trans f).trans e := by
ext
rw [← Equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans, mul_def, Equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans, mul_def]
repeat (rw [trans_apply])
simp [swap, swapCore]
split_ifs <;> rfl
have hefx : e x ≠ e (f x) := mt e.injective.eq_iff.1 hfx
rw [if_neg hfx, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e hy, this, signAux_mul, signAux_swap hefx]
simp only [neg_neg, one_mul, neg_mul]
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 Equiv.Perm.signAux_eq_signAux2
/-- When the multiset `s : Multiset α` contains all nonfixed points of the permutation `f : Perm α`,
`signAux2 f _` recursively calculates the sign of `f`. -/
def signAux3 [Finite α] (f : Perm α) {s : Multiset α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → ℤˣ :=
Quotient.hrecOn s (fun l _ => signAux2 l f) fun l₁ l₂ h ↦ by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
refine Function.hfunext (forall_congr fun _ ↦ propext h.mem_iff) fun h₁ h₂ _ ↦ ?_
rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => h₁ _, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => h₂ _]
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux3 Equiv.Perm.signAux3
theorem signAux3_mul_and_swap [Finite α] (f g : Perm α) (s : Multiset α) (hs : ∀ x, x ∈ s) :
signAux3 (f * g) hs = signAux3 f hs * signAux3 g hs ∧
Pairwise fun x y => signAux3 (swap x y) hs = -1 := by
obtain ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin α
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn with | _ l => ?_
show
signAux2 l (f * g) = signAux2 l f * signAux2 l g ∧
Pairwise fun x y => signAux2 l (swap x y) = -1
have hfg : (e.symm.trans (f * g)).trans e = (e.symm.trans f).trans e * (e.symm.trans g).trans e :=
Equiv.ext fun h => by simp [mul_apply]
constructor
· rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, ←
signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _,
hfg, signAux_mul]
· intro x y hxy
rw [← e.injective.ne_iff] at hxy
rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, symm_trans_swap_trans, signAux_swap hxy]
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux3_mul_and_swap Equiv.Perm.signAux3_mul_and_swap
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Sign.lean | 354 | 364 | theorem signAux3_symm_trans_trans [Finite α] [DecidableEq β] [Finite β] (f : Perm α) (e : α ≃ β)
{s : Multiset α} {t : Multiset β} (hs : ∀ x, x ∈ s) (ht : ∀ x, x ∈ t) :
signAux3 ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) ht = signAux3 f hs := by |
-- Porting note: switched from term mode to tactic mode
induction' t, s using Quotient.inductionOn₂ with t s ht hs
show signAux2 _ _ = signAux2 _ _
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin β with ⟨n, ⟨e'⟩⟩
rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e' fun _ _ => ht _,
← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ (e.trans e') fun _ _ => hs _]
exact congr_arg signAux
(Equiv.ext fun x => by simp [Equiv.coe_trans, apply_eq_iff_eq, symm_trans_apply])
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Quasispectrum
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Spectrum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Liouville
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Polynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.RadiusLiminf
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.CharacterSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Exponential
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.UnitizationL1
#align_import analysis.normed_space.spectrum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d608fc5d4e69d4cc21885913fb573a88b0deb521"
/-!
# The spectrum of elements in a complete normed algebra
This file contains the basic theory for the resolvent and spectrum of a Banach algebra.
## Main definitions
* `spectralRadius : ℝ≥0∞`: supremum of `‖k‖₊` for all `k ∈ spectrum 𝕜 a`
* `NormedRing.algEquivComplexOfComplete`: **Gelfand-Mazur theorem** For a complex
Banach division algebra, the natural `algebraMap ℂ A` is an algebra isomorphism whose inverse
is given by selecting the (unique) element of `spectrum ℂ a`
## Main statements
* `spectrum.isOpen_resolventSet`: the resolvent set is open.
* `spectrum.isClosed`: the spectrum is closed.
* `spectrum.subset_closedBall_norm`: the spectrum is a subset of closed disk of radius
equal to the norm.
* `spectrum.isCompact`: the spectrum is compact.
* `spectrum.spectralRadius_le_nnnorm`: the spectral radius is bounded above by the norm.
* `spectrum.hasDerivAt_resolvent`: the resolvent function is differentiable on the resolvent set.
* `spectrum.pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div_tendsto_nhds_spectralRadius`: Gelfand's formula for the
spectral radius in Banach algebras over `ℂ`.
* `spectrum.nonempty`: the spectrum of any element in a complex Banach algebra is nonempty.
## TODO
* compute all derivatives of `resolvent a`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open NormedSpace -- For `NormedSpace.exp`.
/-- The *spectral radius* is the supremum of the `nnnorm` (`‖·‖₊`) of elements in the spectrum,
coerced into an element of `ℝ≥0∞`. Note that it is possible for `spectrum 𝕜 a = ∅`. In this
case, `spectralRadius a = 0`. It is also possible that `spectrum 𝕜 a` be unbounded (though
not for Banach algebras, see `spectrum.isBounded`, below). In this case,
`spectralRadius a = ∞`. -/
noncomputable def spectralRadius (𝕜 : Type*) {A : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [Ring A] [Algebra 𝕜 A]
(a : A) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ k ∈ spectrum 𝕜 a, ‖k‖₊
#align spectral_radius spectralRadius
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {A : Type*}
namespace spectrum
section SpectrumCompact
open Filter
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A]
local notation "σ" => spectrum 𝕜
local notation "ρ" => resolventSet 𝕜
local notation "↑ₐ" => algebraMap 𝕜 A
@[simp]
theorem SpectralRadius.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton A] (a : A) : spectralRadius 𝕜 a = 0 := by
simp [spectralRadius]
#align spectrum.spectral_radius.of_subsingleton spectrum.SpectralRadius.of_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem spectralRadius_zero : spectralRadius 𝕜 (0 : A) = 0 := by
nontriviality A
simp [spectralRadius]
#align spectrum.spectral_radius_zero spectrum.spectralRadius_zero
theorem mem_resolventSet_of_spectralRadius_lt {a : A} {k : 𝕜} (h : spectralRadius 𝕜 a < ‖k‖₊) :
k ∈ ρ a :=
Classical.not_not.mp fun hn => h.not_le <| le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) k hn
#align spectrum.mem_resolvent_set_of_spectral_radius_lt spectrum.mem_resolventSet_of_spectralRadius_lt
variable [CompleteSpace A]
theorem isOpen_resolventSet (a : A) : IsOpen (ρ a) :=
Units.isOpen.preimage ((continuous_algebraMap 𝕜 A).sub continuous_const)
#align spectrum.is_open_resolvent_set spectrum.isOpen_resolventSet
protected theorem isClosed (a : A) : IsClosed (σ a) :=
(isOpen_resolventSet a).isClosed_compl
#align spectrum.is_closed spectrum.isClosed
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Spectrum.lean | 104 | 113 | theorem mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt_mul {a : A} {k : 𝕜} (h : ‖a‖ * ‖(1 : A)‖ < ‖k‖) : k ∈ ρ a := by |
rw [resolventSet, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
nontriviality A
have hk : k ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ((mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)).trans_lt h).ne'
letI ku := Units.map ↑ₐ.toMonoidHom (Units.mk0 k hk)
rw [← inv_inv ‖(1 : A)‖,
mul_inv_lt_iff (inv_pos.2 <| norm_pos_iff.2 (one_ne_zero : (1 : A) ≠ 0))] at h
have hku : ‖-a‖ < ‖(↑ku⁻¹ : A)‖⁻¹ := by simpa [ku, norm_algebraMap] using h
simpa [ku, sub_eq_add_neg, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] using (ku.add (-a) hku).isUnit
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
continuity
#align complex.continuous_sin Complex.continuous_sin
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
#align complex.continuous_on_sin Complex.continuousOn_sin
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
continuity
#align complex.continuous_cos Complex.continuous_cos
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
#align complex.continuous_on_cos Complex.continuousOn_cos
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
continuity
#align complex.continuous_sinh Complex.continuous_sinh
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
continuity
#align complex.continuous_cosh Complex.continuous_cosh
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
#align real.continuous_sin Real.continuous_sin
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
#align real.continuous_on_sin Real.continuousOn_sin
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
#align real.continuous_cos Real.continuous_cos
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
#align real.continuous_on_cos Real.continuousOn_cos
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
#align real.continuous_sinh Real.continuous_sinh
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
#align real.continuous_cosh Real.continuous_cosh
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
#align real.exists_cos_eq_zero Real.exists_cos_eq_zero
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
#align real.pi Real.pi
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
#align real.cos_pi_div_two Real.cos_pi_div_two
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
#align real.one_le_pi_div_two Real.one_le_pi_div_two
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
#align real.pi_div_two_le_two Real.pi_div_two_le_two
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
#align real.two_le_pi Real.two_le_pi
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
#align real.pi_le_four Real.pi_le_four
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
#align real.pi_pos Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
#align real.pi_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
#align real.pi_div_two_pos Real.pi_div_two_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.two_pi_pos Real.two_pi_pos
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
#align nnreal.pi NNReal.pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_real_pi NNReal.coe_real_pi
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
#align nnreal.pi_pos NNReal.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
#align nnreal.pi_ne_zero NNReal.pi_ne_zero
end NNReal
namespace Real
open Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
#align real.sin_pi Real.sin_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
#align real.cos_pi Real.cos_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
#align real.sin_two_pi Real.sin_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
#align real.cos_two_pi Real.cos_two_pi
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
#align real.sin_antiperiodic Real.sin_antiperiodic
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
#align real.sin_periodic Real.sin_periodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
#align real.sin_add_pi Real.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
#align real.sin_add_two_pi Real.sin_add_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
#align real.sin_sub_pi Real.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
#align real.sin_sub_two_pi Real.sin_sub_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
#align real.sin_pi_sub Real.sin_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
#align real.sin_two_pi_sub Real.sin_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
#align real.sin_nat_mul_pi Real.sin_nat_mul_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
#align real.sin_int_mul_pi Real.sin_int_mul_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
#align real.sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi Real.sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
#align real.sin_add_int_mul_two_pi Real.sin_add_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
#align real.sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi Real.sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
#align real.sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi Real.sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub Real.sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub Real.sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.coe_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
#align real.cos_antiperiodic Real.cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
#align real.cos_periodic Real.cos_periodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
#align real.cos_add_pi Real.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
#align real.cos_add_two_pi Real.cos_add_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
#align real.cos_sub_pi Real.cos_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
#align real.cos_sub_two_pi Real.cos_sub_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
#align real.cos_pi_sub Real.cos_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
#align real.cos_two_pi_sub Real.cos_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
#align real.cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
#align real.cos_add_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_add_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
#align real.cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
#align real.cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
#align real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi Real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
#align real.sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo Real.sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
#align real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
#align real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
#align real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
#align real.sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le Real.sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
#align real.sin_pi_div_two Real.sin_pi_div_two
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
#align real.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
#align real.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
#align real.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
#align real.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
#align real.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
#align real.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
#align real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
#align real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
#align real.cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le Real.cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align real.cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le Real.cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
#align real.sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq Real.sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
#align real.cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq Real.cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt Real.sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.sin_ne_zero_iff
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq Real.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel ((Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero _ _).2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
#align real.cos_eq_one_iff Real.cos_eq_one_iff
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align real.cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt Real.cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
#align real.sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two Real.sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
#align real.strict_mono_on_sin Real.strictMonoOn_sin
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
#align real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
#align real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two Real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
#align real.strict_anti_on_cos Real.strictAntiOn_cos
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
#align real.cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
#align real.sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two Real.sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
#align real.inj_on_sin Real.injOn_sin
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
#align real.inj_on_cos Real.injOn_cos
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
#align real.surj_on_sin Real.surjOn_sin
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
#align real.surj_on_cos Real.surjOn_cos
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
#align real.sin_mem_Icc Real.sin_mem_Icc
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
#align real.cos_mem_Icc Real.cos_mem_Icc
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
#align real.maps_to_sin Real.mapsTo_sin
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
#align real.maps_to_cos Real.mapsTo_cos
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
#align real.bij_on_sin Real.bijOn_sin
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
#align real.bij_on_cos Real.bijOn_cos
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
#align real.range_cos Real.range_cos
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
#align real.range_sin Real.range_sin
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
#align real.range_cos_infinite Real.range_cos_infinite
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
#align real.range_sin_infinite Real.range_sin_infinite
section CosDivSq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrtTwoAddSeries x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp]
noncomputable def sqrtTwoAddSeries (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 => x
| n + 1 => √(2 + sqrtTwoAddSeries x n)
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero : sqrtTwoAddSeries x 0 = x := by simp
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_zero Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_one : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 1 = √2 := by simp
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_one Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_one
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_two : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 2 = √(2 + √2) := by simp
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_two Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_two
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n
| 0 => le_refl 0
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries x n
| 0 => h
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_nonneg Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two : ∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n < 2
| 0 => by norm_num
| n + 1 => by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt']
· refine (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two n).trans_le ?_
norm_num
· exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg n)
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_lt_two Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x (n + 1) = sqrtTwoAddSeries (√(2 + x)) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ _ _, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_succ Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x n ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries y n
| 0 => h
| n + 1 => by
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left h _) _)
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_monotone_left Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, cos (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
have A : (1 : ℝ) < 2 ^ (n + 1) := one_lt_pow one_lt_two n.succ_ne_zero
have B : π / 2 ^ (n + 1) < π := div_lt_self pi_pos A
have C : 0 < π / 2 ^ (n + 1) := by positivity
rw [pow_succ, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_over_two_pow n, sqrtTwoAddSeries,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div, one_mul, ← div_mul_eq_div_div, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;>
linarith [sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg le_rfl n]
#align real.cos_pi_over_two_pow Real.cos_pi_over_two_pow
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
#align real.sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow Real.sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 4 := by
rw [sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow, sqrtTwoAddSeries, div_pow, sq_sqrt, add_div, ← sub_sub]
· congr
· norm_num
· norm_num
· exact add_nonneg two_pos.le (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg _)
#align real.sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ Real.sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) = √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq two_ne_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_sq_eq, mul_pow,
sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul]
· congr <;> norm_num
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two _).le
refine mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ ?_) zero_le_two
· positivity
· exact div_le_self pi_pos.le <| one_le_pow_of_one_le one_le_two _
#align real.sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ Real.sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_four : cos (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
#align real.cos_pi_div_four Real.cos_pi_div_four
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_four : sin (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
#align real.sin_pi_div_four Real.sin_pi_div_four
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_eight : cos (π / 8) = √(2 + √2) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
#align real.cos_pi_div_eight Real.cos_pi_div_eight
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_eight : sin (π / 8) = √(2 - √2) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
#align real.sin_pi_div_eight Real.sin_pi_div_eight
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (π / 16) = √(2 + √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
#align real.cos_pi_div_sixteen Real.cos_pi_div_sixteen
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (π / 16) = √(2 - √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
#align real.sin_pi_div_sixteen Real.sin_pi_div_sixteen
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (π / 32) = √(2 + √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
#align real.cos_pi_div_thirty_two Real.cos_pi_div_thirty_two
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (π / 32) = √(2 - √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
#align real.sin_pi_div_thirty_two Real.sin_pi_div_thirty_two
-- This section is also a convenient location for other explicit values of `sin` and `cos`.
/-- The cosine of `π / 3` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_three : cos (π / 3) = 1 / 2 := by
have h₁ : (2 * cos (π / 3) - 1) ^ 2 * (2 * cos (π / 3) + 2) = 0 := by
have : cos (3 * (π / 3)) = cos π := by
congr 1
ring
linarith [cos_pi, cos_three_mul (π / 3)]
cases' mul_eq_zero.mp h₁ with h h
· linarith [pow_eq_zero h]
· have : cos π < cos (π / 3) := by
refine cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ le_rfl ?_ <;> linarith [pi_pos]
linarith [cos_pi]
#align real.cos_pi_div_three Real.cos_pi_div_three
/-- The cosine of `π / 6` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [show (6 : ℝ) = 3 * 2 by norm_num, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_div_three, one_add_div,
← div_mul_eq_div_div, two_add_one_eq_three, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.cos_pi_div_six Real.cos_pi_div_six
/-- The square of the cosine of `π / 6` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [cos_pi_div_six, div_pow, sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
#align real.sq_cos_pi_div_six Real.sq_cos_pi_div_six
/-- The sine of `π / 6` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_six : sin (π / 6) = 1 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_three]
congr
ring
#align real.sin_pi_div_six Real.sin_pi_div_six
/-- The square of the sine of `π / 3` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← sq_cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
#align real.sq_sin_pi_div_three Real.sq_sin_pi_div_three
/-- The sine of `π / 3` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
#align real.sin_pi_div_three Real.sin_pi_div_three
end CosDivSq
/-- `Real.sin` as an `OrderIso` between `[-(π / 2), π / 2]` and `[-1, 1]`. -/
def sinOrderIso : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.orderIso _ _).trans <| OrderIso.setCongr _ _ bijOn_sin.image_eq
#align real.sin_order_iso Real.sinOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : (sinOrderIso x : ℝ) = sin x :=
rfl
#align real.coe_sin_order_iso_apply Real.coe_sinOrderIso_apply
theorem sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : sinOrderIso x = ⟨sin x, sin_mem_Icc x⟩ :=
rfl
#align real.sin_order_iso_apply Real.sinOrderIso_apply
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_four : tan (π / 4) = 1 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_pi_div_four, sin_pi_div_four]
have h : √2 / 2 > 0 := by positivity
exact div_self (ne_of_gt h)
#align real.tan_pi_div_four Real.tan_pi_div_four
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_two : tan (π / 2) = 0 := by simp [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
#align real.tan_pi_div_two Real.tan_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_six : tan (π / 6) = 1 / sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_six, cos_pi_div_six]
ring
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_three : tan (π / 3) = sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_three, cos_pi_div_three]
ring
theorem tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith)) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hxp⟩)
#align real.tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two Real.tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two
theorem tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| Or.inl hx0, Or.inl hxp => le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| Or.inl _, Or.inr hxp => by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| Or.inr hx0, _ => by simp [hx0.symm]
#align real.tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two Real.tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
#align real.tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt Real.tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt
theorem tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) :
tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith))
#align real.tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le Real.tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le
theorem strictMonoOn_tan : StrictMonoOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
rintro x hx y hy hlt
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos,
div_lt_div_iff (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hy), mul_comm, ← sub_pos, ← sin_sub]
exact sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (sub_pos.2 hlt) <| by linarith [hx.1, hy.2]
#align real.strict_mono_on_tan Real.strictMonoOn_tan
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
strictMonoOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ hxy
#align real.tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two Real.tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hy₂ hxy
#align real.tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two Real.tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two
theorem injOn_tan : InjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_tan.injOn
#align real.inj_on_tan Real.injOn_tan
theorem tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
injOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ hxy
#align real.tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two Real.tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan π := by
simpa only [Function.Periodic, tan_eq_sin_div_cos] using sin_antiperiodic.div cos_antiperiodic
#align real.tan_periodic Real.tan_periodic
-- Porting note (#10756): added theorem
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi : tan π = 0 := by rw [tan_periodic.eq, tan_zero]
theorem tan_add_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x + π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic x
#align real.tan_add_pi Real.tan_add_pi
theorem tan_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x - π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq x
#align real.tan_sub_pi Real.tan_sub_pi
theorem tan_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.sub_eq'
#align real.tan_pi_sub Real.tan_pi_sub
theorem tan_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π / 2 - x) = (tan x)⁻¹ := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos, inv_div, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_pi_div_two_sub]
#align real.tan_pi_div_two_sub Real.tan_pi_div_two_sub
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_eq n
#align real.tan_nat_mul_pi Real.tan_nat_mul_pi
theorem tan_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_eq n
#align real.tan_int_mul_pi Real.tan_int_mul_pi
theorem tan_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.nat_mul n x
#align real.tan_add_nat_mul_pi Real.tan_add_nat_mul_pi
theorem tan_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.int_mul n x
#align real.tan_add_int_mul_pi Real.tan_add_int_mul_pi
theorem tan_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
#align real.tan_sub_nat_mul_pi Real.tan_sub_nat_mul_pi
theorem tan_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
#align real.tan_sub_int_mul_pi Real.tan_sub_int_mul_pi
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.tan_nat_mul_pi_sub Real.tan_nat_mul_pi_sub
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.tan_int_mul_pi_sub Real.tan_int_mul_pi_sub
theorem tendsto_sin_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
#align real.tendsto_sin_pi_div_two Real.tendsto_sin_pi_div_two
theorem tendsto_cos_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio
(right_mem_Ioc.mpr (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos))] with x hx using cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
#align real.tendsto_cos_pi_div_two Real.tendsto_cos_pi_div_two
theorem tendsto_tan_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) atTop := by
convert tendsto_cos_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_zero.atTop_mul zero_lt_one tendsto_sin_pi_div_two
using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
#align real.tendsto_tan_pi_div_two Real.tendsto_tan_pi_div_two
theorem tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝 (-1)) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto using 2
simp
#align real.tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two Real.tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two
theorem tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi
(left_mem_Ico.mpr (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos))] with x hx using cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
#align real.tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two Real.tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two
theorem tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) atBot := by
convert tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_zero.atTop_mul_neg (by norm_num)
tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
#align real.tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two Real.tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two
end Real
namespace Complex
open Real
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {z : ℂ} : sin z = 0 ↔ cos z = 1 ∨ cos z = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
#align complex.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq Complex.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
calc
cos (π / 2) = Real.cos (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_cos]; simp
_ = 0 := by simp
#align complex.cos_pi_div_two Complex.cos_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
calc
sin (π / 2) = Real.sin (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_sin]; simp
_ = 1 := by simp
#align complex.sin_pi_div_two Complex.sin_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sin, Real.sin_pi]; simp
#align complex.sin_pi Complex.sin_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by rw [← ofReal_cos, Real.cos_pi]; simp
#align complex.cos_pi Complex.cos_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
#align complex.sin_two_pi Complex.sin_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
#align complex.cos_two_pi Complex.cos_two_pi
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
#align complex.sin_antiperiodic Complex.sin_antiperiodic
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
#align complex.sin_periodic Complex.sin_periodic
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
#align complex.sin_add_pi Complex.sin_add_pi
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
#align complex.sin_add_two_pi Complex.sin_add_two_pi
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
#align complex.sin_sub_pi Complex.sin_sub_pi
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
#align complex.sin_sub_two_pi Complex.sin_sub_two_pi
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
#align complex.sin_pi_sub Complex.sin_pi_sub
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
#align complex.sin_two_pi_sub Complex.sin_two_pi_sub
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
#align complex.sin_nat_mul_pi Complex.sin_nat_mul_pi
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
#align complex.sin_int_mul_pi Complex.sin_int_mul_pi
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
#align complex.sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi Complex.sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
#align complex.sin_add_int_mul_two_pi Complex.sin_add_int_mul_two_pi
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
#align complex.sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi Complex.sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
#align complex.sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi Complex.sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
#align complex.sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub Complex.sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
#align complex.sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub Complex.sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 1,217 | 1,217 | theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by | simp [cos_add]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
#align_import data.polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
#align polynomial Polynomial
#align polynomial.of_finsupp Polynomial.ofFinsupp
#align polynomial.to_finsupp Polynomial.toFinsupp
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
#align polynomial.forall_iff_forall_finsupp Polynomial.forall_iff_forall_finsupp
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
#align polynomial.exists_iff_exists_finsupp Polynomial.exists_iff_exists_finsupp
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
#align polynomial.eta Polynomial.eta
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
#align polynomial.has_zero Polynomial.zero
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
#align polynomial.one Polynomial.one
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
#align polynomial.has_add Polynomial.add'
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
#align polynomial.has_neg Polynomial.neg'
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
#align polynomial.has_sub Polynomial.sub
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
#align polynomial.has_mul Polynomial.mul'
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
#align polynomial.smul_zero_class Polynomial.smulZeroClass
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
#align polynomial.has_pow Polynomial.pow
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_zero Polynomial.ofFinsupp_zero
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_one Polynomial.ofFinsupp_one
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_add Polynomial.ofFinsupp_add
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_neg Polynomial.ofFinsupp_neg
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_sub Polynomial.ofFinsupp_sub
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_mul Polynomial.ofFinsupp_mul
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_smul Polynomial.ofFinsupp_smul
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_pow Polynomial.ofFinsupp_pow
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_zero Polynomial.toFinsupp_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_one Polynomial.toFinsupp_one
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_add Polynomial.toFinsupp_add
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_neg Polynomial.toFinsupp_neg
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_sub Polynomial.toFinsupp_sub
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_mul Polynomial.toFinsupp_mul
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_smul Polynomial.toFinsupp_smul
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_pow Polynomial.toFinsupp_pow
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
#align is_smul_regular.polynomial IsSMulRegular.polynomial
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_injective Polynomial.toFinsupp_injective
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_inj Polynomial.toFinsupp_inj
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_eq_zero Polynomial.toFinsupp_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_eq_one Polynomial.toFinsupp_eq_one
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_inj Polynomial.ofFinsupp_inj
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_eq_zero Polynomial.ofFinsupp_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_eq_one Polynomial.ofFinsupp_eq_one
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
#align polynomial.inhabited Polynomial.inhabited
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
#align polynomial.has_nat_cast Polynomial.instNatCast
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero toFinsupp_one
toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_smul _ _) toFinsupp_pow fun _ => rfl with
toAdd := Polynomial.add'
toMul := Polynomial.mul'
toZero := Polynomial.zero
toOne := Polynomial.one
nsmul := (· • ·)
npow := fun n x => (x ^ n) }
#align polynomial.semiring Polynomial.semiring
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective
toFinsupp_smul with
toSMulZeroClass := Polynomial.smulZeroClass }
#align polynomial.distrib_smul Polynomial.distribSMul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul with
toSMul := Polynomial.smulZeroClass.toSMul }
#align polynomial.distrib_mul_action Polynomial.distribMulAction
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
#align polynomial.has_faithful_smul Polynomial.faithfulSMul
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective
toFinsupp_smul with
toDistribMulAction := Polynomial.distribMulAction }
#align polynomial.module Polynomial.module
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
#align polynomial.smul_comm_class Polynomial.smulCommClass
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
#align polynomial.is_scalar_tower Polynomial.isScalarTower
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩;
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
#align polynomial.is_scalar_tower_right Polynomial.isScalarTower_right
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
#align polynomial.is_central_scalar Polynomial.isCentralScalar
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
#align polynomial.unique Polynomial.unique
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso Polynomial.toFinsuppIso
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso_apply Polynomial.toFinsuppIso_apply
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso_symm_apply Polynomial.toFinsuppIso_symm_apply
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_sum Polynomial.ofFinsupp_sum
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_sum Polynomial.toFinsupp_sum
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient.
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: The original generated theorem is same to `support_ofFinsupp` and
-- the new generated theorem is different, so this attribute should be
-- removed.
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
#align polynomial.support Polynomial.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
#align polynomial.support_of_finsupp Polynomial.support_ofFinsupp
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.support_zero Polynomial.support_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
#align polynomial.support_eq_empty Polynomial.support_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : p.support.card = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.card_support_eq_zero Polynomial.card_support_eq_zero
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
#align polynomial.monomial Polynomial.monomial
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_monomial Polynomial.toFinsupp_monomial
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_single Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_right Polynomial.monomial_zero_right
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_one Polynomial.monomial_zero_one
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
#align polynomial.monomial_add Polynomial.monomial_add
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_monomial Polynomial.monomial_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
· simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, mul_add, add_comm]
#align polynomial.monomial_pow Polynomial.monomial_pow
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp; rw [smul_single]
#align polynomial.smul_monomial Polynomial.smul_monomial
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
#align polynomial.monomial_injective Polynomial.monomial_injective
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
#align polynomial.monomial_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.monomial_eq_zero_iff
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
#align polynomial.support_add Polynomial.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
#align polynomial.C Polynomial.C
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_left Polynomial.monomial_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_C Polynomial.toFinsupp_C
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.C_0 Polynomial.C_0
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.C_1 Polynomial.C_1
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
#align polynomial.C_mul Polynomial.C_mul
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
#align polynomial.C_add Polynomial.C_add
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
#align polynomial.smul_C Polynomial.smul_C
set_option linter.deprecated false in
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_bit0 : C (bit0 a) = bit0 (C a) :=
C_add
#align polynomial.C_bit0 Polynomial.C_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_bit1 : C (bit1 a) = bit1 (C a) := by simp [bit1, C_bit0]
#align polynomial.C_bit1 Polynomial.C_bit1
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
#align polynomial.C_pow Polynomial.C_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
#align polynomial.C_eq_nat_cast Polynomial.C_eq_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias C_eq_nat_cast := C_eq_natCast
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
#align polynomial.C_mul_monomial Polynomial.C_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_C Polynomial.monomial_mul_C
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
#align polynomial.X Polynomial.X
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_one_one_eq_X Polynomial.monomial_one_one_eq_X
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp [monomial_zero_one]
· rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow Polynomial.monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_X Polynomial.toFinsupp_X
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
-- Porting note: `ofFinsupp.injEq` is required.
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
-- Porting note: Was `ext`.
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
#align polynomial.X_mul Polynomial.X_mul
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul Polynomial.X_pow_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
#align polynomial.X_mul_C Polynomial.X_mul_C
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_C Polynomial.X_pow_mul_C
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc Polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc_C Polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc_C
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
#align polynomial.commute_X Polynomial.commute_X
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
#align polynomial.commute_X_pow Polynomial.commute_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
erw [monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_X Polynomial.monomial_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_X_pow Polynomial.monomial_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
#align polynomial.X_mul_monomial Polynomial.X_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_monomial Polynomial.X_pow_mul_monomial
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: The original generated theorem is same to `coeff_ofFinsupp` and
-- the new generated theorem is different, so this attribute should be
-- removed.
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
#align polynomial.coeff Polynomial.coeff
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
-- Porting note: `ofFinsupp.injEq` is required.
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
#align polynomial.coeff_injective Polynomial.coeff_injective
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
#align polynomial.coeff_inj Polynomial.coeff_inj
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_apply Polynomial.toFinsupp_apply
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
#align polynomial.coeff_monomial Polynomial.coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coeff_zero Polynomial.coeff_zero
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
#align polynomial.coeff_one Polynomial.coeff_one
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
#align polynomial.coeff_one_zero Polynomial.coeff_one_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
#align polynomial.coeff_X_one Polynomial.coeff_X_one
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
#align polynomial.coeff_X_zero Polynomial.coeff_X_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
#align polynomial.coeff_monomial_succ Polynomial.coeff_monomial_succ
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
#align polynomial.coeff_X Polynomial.coeff_X
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
#align polynomial.coeff_X_of_ne_one Polynomial.coeff_X_of_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
#align polynomial.mem_support_iff Polynomial.mem_support_iff
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.not_mem_support_iff Polynomial.not_mem_support_iff
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
#align polynomial.coeff_C Polynomial.coeff_C
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
#align polynomial.coeff_C_zero Polynomial.coeff_C_zero
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
#align polynomial.coeff_C_ne_zero Polynomial.coeff_C_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coeff_nat_cast_ite := coeff_natCast_ite
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (no_index (OfNat.ofNat a : R[X])) 0 = OfNat.ofNat a :=
coeff_monomial
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (no_index (OfNat.ofNat a : R[X])) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_eq_ofNat]
simp
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
#align polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial Polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
#align polynomial.C_mul_X_eq_monomial Polynomial.C_mul_X_eq_monomial
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_C_mul_X Polynomial.toFinsupp_C_mul_X
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
#align polynomial.C_injective Polynomial.C_injective
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
#align polynomial.C_inj Polynomial.C_inj
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
#align polynomial.C_eq_zero Polynomial.C_eq_zero
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
#align polynomial.C_ne_zero Polynomial.C_ne_zero
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
#align polynomial.subsingleton_iff_subsingleton Polynomial.subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align polynomial.nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne Polynomial.Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
#align polynomial.forall_eq_iff_forall_eq Polynomial.forall_eq_iff_forall_eq
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [coeff, DFunLike.ext_iff]`
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
#align polynomial.ext_iff Polynomial.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
#align polynomial.ext Polynomial.ext
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
#align polynomial.add_submonoid_closure_set_of_eq_monomial Polynomial.addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
#align polynomial.add_hom_ext Polynomial.addHom_ext
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
#align polynomial.add_hom_ext' Polynomial.addHom_ext'
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
#align polynomial.lhom_ext' Polynomial.lhom_ext'
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_zero_of_eq_zero
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
#align polynomial.support_monomial Polynomial.support_monomial
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
#align polynomial.support_monomial' Polynomial.support_monomial'
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
#align polynomial.support_C_mul_X Polynomial.support_C_mul_X
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
#align polynomial.support_C_mul_X' Polynomial.support_C_mul_X'
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
#align polynomial.support_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.support_C_mul_X_pow
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
#align polynomial.support_C_mul_X_pow' Polynomial.support_C_mul_X_pow'
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
#align polynomial.support_binomial' Polynomial.support_binomial'
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
#align polynomial.support_trinomial' Polynomial.support_trinomial'
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction' n with n hn
· rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
· rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
#align polynomial.X_pow_eq_monomial Polynomial.X_pow_eq_monomial
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_X_pow Polynomial.toFinsupp_X_pow
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
#align polynomial.smul_X_eq_monomial Polynomial.smul_X_eq_monomial
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
#align polynomial.support_X_pow Polynomial.support_X_pow
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
#align polynomial.support_X_empty Polynomial.support_X_empty
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
#align polynomial.support_X Polynomial.support_X
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
#align polynomial.monomial_left_inj Polynomial.monomial_left_inj
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
#align polynomial.binomial_eq_binomial Polynomial.binomial_eq_binomial
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
#align polynomial.nat_cast_mul Polynomial.natCast_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_mul := natCast_mul
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
#align polynomial.sum Polynomial.sum
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.sum_def Polynomial.sum_def
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
#align polynomial.sum_eq_of_subset Polynomial.sum_eq_of_subset
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
#align polynomial.mul_eq_sum_sum Polynomial.mul_eq_sum_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
#align polynomial.sum_zero_index Polynomial.sum_zero_index
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
#align polynomial.sum_monomial_index Polynomial.sum_monomial_index
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
#align polynomial.sum_C_index Polynomial.sum_C_index
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
@[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
(X : R[X]).sum f = f 1 1 :=
sum_monomial_index 1 f hf
#align polynomial.sum_X_index Polynomial.sum_X_index
theorem sum_add_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p q : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) :
(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f := by
rw [show p + q = ⟨p.toFinsupp + q.toFinsupp⟩ from add_def p q]
exact Finsupp.sum_add_index (fun i _ ↦ hf i) (fun a _ b₁ b₂ ↦ h_add a b₁ b₂)
#align polynomial.sum_add_index Polynomial.sum_add_index
theorem sum_add' {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum (f + g) = p.sum f + p.sum g := by simp [sum_def, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
#align polynomial.sum_add' Polynomial.sum_add'
theorem sum_add {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
(p.sum fun n x => f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g :=
sum_add' _ _ _
#align polynomial.sum_add Polynomial.sum_add
theorem sum_smul_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b * a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index hf
#align polynomial.sum_smul_index Polynomial.sum_smul_index
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq : ∀ p : R[X], (p.sum fun n a => monomial n a) = p
| ⟨_p⟩ => (ofFinsupp_sum _ _).symm.trans (congr_arg _ <| Finsupp.sum_single _)
#align polynomial.sum_monomial_eq Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq
theorem sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq (p : R[X]) : (p.sum fun n a => C a * X ^ n) = p := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, sum_monomial_eq]
#align polynomial.sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq Polynomial.sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq
/-- `erase p n` is the polynomial `p` in which the `X^n` term has been erased. -/
irreducible_def erase (n : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p.erase n⟩
#align polynomial.erase Polynomial.erase
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : toFinsupp (p.erase n) = p.toFinsupp.erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_erase Polynomial.toFinsupp_erase
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 1,070 | 1,073 | theorem ofFinsupp_erase (p : R[ℕ]) (n : ℕ) :
(⟨p.erase n⟩ : R[X]) = (⟨p⟩ : R[X]).erase n := by |
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.StructurePolynomial
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f1944b30c97c5eb626e498307dec8b022a05bd0a"
/-!
# Witt vectors
In this file we define the type of `p`-typical Witt vectors and ring operations on it.
The ring axioms are verified in `Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Basic.lean`.
For a fixed commutative ring `R` and prime `p`,
a Witt vector `x : 𝕎 R` is an infinite sequence `ℕ → R` of elements of `R`.
However, the ring operations `+` and `*` are not defined in the obvious component-wise way.
Instead, these operations are defined via certain polynomials
using the machinery in `Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean`.
The `n`th value of the sum of two Witt vectors can depend on the `0`-th through `n`th values
of the summands. This effectively simulates a “carrying” operation.
## Main definitions
* `WittVector p R`: the type of `p`-typical Witt vectors with coefficients in `R`.
* `WittVector.coeff x n`: projects the `n`th value of the Witt vector `x`.
## Notation
We use notation `𝕎 R`, entered `\bbW`, for the Witt vectors over `R`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `WittVector p R` is the ring of `p`-typical Witt vectors over the commutative ring `R`,
where `p` is a prime number.
If `p` is invertible in `R`, this ring is isomorphic to `ℕ → R` (the product of `ℕ` copies of `R`).
If `R` is a ring of characteristic `p`, then `WittVector p R` is a ring of characteristic `0`.
The canonical example is `WittVector p (ZMod p)`,
which is isomorphic to the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]`. -/
structure WittVector (p : ℕ) (R : Type*) where mk' ::
/-- `x.coeff n` is the `n`th coefficient of the Witt vector `x`.
This concept does not have a standard name in the literature.
-/
coeff : ℕ → R
#align witt_vector WittVector
-- Porting note: added to make the `p` argument explicit
/-- Construct a Witt vector `mk p x : 𝕎 R` from a sequence `x` of elements of `R`. -/
def WittVector.mk (p : ℕ) {R : Type*} (coeff : ℕ → R) : WittVector p R := mk' coeff
variable {p : ℕ}
/- We cannot make this `localized` notation, because the `p` on the RHS doesn't occur on the left
Hiding the `p` in the notation is very convenient, so we opt for repeating the `local notation`
in other files that use Witt vectors. -/
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
namespace WittVector
variable {R : Type*}
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : 𝕎 R} (h : ∀ n, x.coeff n = y.coeff n) : x = y := by
cases x
cases y
simp only at h
simp [Function.funext_iff, h]
#align witt_vector.ext WittVector.ext
theorem ext_iff {x y : 𝕎 R} : x = y ↔ ∀ n, x.coeff n = y.coeff n :=
⟨fun h n => by rw [h], ext⟩
#align witt_vector.ext_iff WittVector.ext_iff
variable (p)
theorem coeff_mk (x : ℕ → R) : (mk p x).coeff = x :=
rfl
#align witt_vector.coeff_mk WittVector.coeff_mk
/- These instances are not needed for the rest of the development,
but it is interesting to establish early on that `WittVector p` is a lawful functor. -/
instance : Functor (WittVector p) where
map f v := mk p (f ∘ v.coeff)
mapConst a _ := mk p fun _ => a
instance : LawfulFunctor (WittVector p) where
map_const := rfl
-- Porting note: no longer needs to deconstruct `v` to conclude `{coeff := v.coeff} = v`
id_map _ := rfl
comp_map _ _ _ := rfl
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R]
open MvPolynomial
section RingOperations
/-- The polynomials used for defining the element `0` of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittZero : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 0 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p 0
#align witt_vector.witt_zero WittVector.wittZero
/-- The polynomials used for defining the element `1` of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittOne : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 0 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p 1
#align witt_vector.witt_one WittVector.wittOne
/-- The polynomials used for defining the addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittAdd : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 + X 1)
#align witt_vector.witt_add WittVector.wittAdd
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittNSMul (n : ℕ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (n • X (0 : (Fin 1)))
#align witt_vector.witt_nsmul WittVector.wittNSMul
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittZSMul (n : ℤ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (n • X (0 : (Fin 1)))
#align witt_vector.witt_zsmul WittVector.wittZSMul
/-- The polynomials used for describing the subtraction of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittSub : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 - X 1)
#align witt_vector.witt_sub WittVector.wittSub
/-- The polynomials used for defining the multiplication of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittMul : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 * X 1)
#align witt_vector.witt_mul WittVector.wittMul
/-- The polynomials used for defining the negation of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittNeg : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (-X 0)
#align witt_vector.witt_neg WittVector.wittNeg
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittPow (n : ℕ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 ^ n)
#align witt_vector.witt_pow WittVector.wittPow
variable {p}
/-- An auxiliary definition used in `WittVector.eval`.
Evaluates a polynomial whose variables come from the disjoint union of `k` copies of `ℕ`,
with a curried evaluation `x`.
This can be defined more generally but we use only a specific instance here. -/
def peval {k : ℕ} (φ : MvPolynomial (Fin k × ℕ) ℤ) (x : Fin k → ℕ → R) : R :=
aeval (Function.uncurry x) φ
#align witt_vector.peval WittVector.peval
/-- Let `φ` be a family of polynomials, indexed by natural numbers, whose variables come from the
disjoint union of `k` copies of `ℕ`, and let `xᵢ` be a Witt vector for `0 ≤ i < k`.
`eval φ x` evaluates `φ` mapping the variable `X_(i, n)` to the `n`th coefficient of `xᵢ`.
Instantiating `φ` with certain polynomials defined in
`Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean` establishes the
ring operations on `𝕎 R`. For example, `WittVector.wittAdd` is such a `φ` with `k = 2`;
evaluating this at `(x₀, x₁)` gives us the sum of two Witt vectors `x₀ + x₁`.
-/
def eval {k : ℕ} (φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin k × ℕ) ℤ) (x : Fin k → 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => peval (φ n) fun i => (x i).coeff
#align witt_vector.eval WittVector.eval
variable (R) [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Zero (𝕎 R) :=
⟨eval (wittZero p) ![]⟩
instance : Inhabited (𝕎 R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One (𝕎 R) :=
⟨eval (wittOne p) ![]⟩
instance : Add (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittAdd p) ![x, y]⟩
instance : Sub (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittSub p) ![x, y]⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun n x => eval (wittNSMul p n) ![x]⟩
#align witt_vector.has_nat_scalar WittVector.hasNatScalar
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun n x => eval (wittZSMul p n) ![x]⟩
#align witt_vector.has_int_scalar WittVector.hasIntScalar
instance : Mul (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittMul p) ![x, y]⟩
instance : Neg (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x => eval (wittNeg p) ![x]⟩
instance hasNatPow : Pow (𝕎 R) ℕ :=
⟨fun x n => eval (wittPow p n) ![x]⟩
#align witt_vector.has_nat_pow WittVector.hasNatPow
instance : NatCast (𝕎 R) :=
⟨Nat.unaryCast⟩
instance : IntCast (𝕎 R) :=
⟨Int.castDef⟩
end RingOperations
section WittStructureSimplifications
@[simp]
theorem wittZero_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : wittZero p n = 0 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittZero, wittStructureRat, bind₁, aeval_zero', constantCoeff_xInTermsOfW,
RingHom.map_zero, AlgHom.map_zero, map_wittStructureInt]
#align witt_vector.witt_zero_eq_zero WittVector.wittZero_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem wittOne_zero_eq_one : wittOne p 0 = 1 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittOne, wittStructureRat, xInTermsOfW_zero, AlgHom.map_one, RingHom.map_one,
bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
#align witt_vector.witt_one_zero_eq_one WittVector.wittOne_zero_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem wittOne_pos_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : wittOne p n = 0 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittOne, wittStructureRat, RingHom.map_zero, AlgHom.map_one, RingHom.map_one,
map_wittStructureInt]
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on with | h n IH => ?_
rw [xInTermsOfW_eq]
simp only [AlgHom.map_mul, AlgHom.map_sub, AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_pow, bind₁_X_right,
bind₁_C_right]
rw [sub_mul, one_mul]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single 0]
· simp only [invOf_eq_inv, one_mul, inv_pow, tsub_zero, RingHom.map_one, pow_zero]
simp only [one_pow, one_mul, xInTermsOfW_zero, sub_self, bind₁_X_right]
· intro i hin hi0
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hin
rw [IH _ hin (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hi0), zero_pow (pow_ne_zero _ hp.1.ne_zero), mul_zero]
· rw [Finset.mem_range]; intro; contradiction
#align witt_vector.witt_one_pos_eq_zero WittVector.wittOne_pos_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem wittAdd_zero : wittAdd p 0 = X (0, 0) + X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittAdd, wittStructureRat, AlgHom.map_add, RingHom.map_add, rename_X,
xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
#align witt_vector.witt_add_zero WittVector.wittAdd_zero
@[simp]
theorem wittSub_zero : wittSub p 0 = X (0, 0) - X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittSub, wittStructureRat, AlgHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_sub, rename_X,
xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
#align witt_vector.witt_sub_zero WittVector.wittSub_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Defs.lean | 272 | 275 | theorem wittMul_zero : wittMul p 0 = X (0, 0) * X (1, 0) := by |
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittMul, wittStructureRat, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero,
RingHom.map_mul, bind₁_X_right, AlgHom.map_mul, map_wittStructureInt]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Cycle factors of a permutation
Let `β` be a `Fintype` and `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleOf`: `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of `f` that `x` belongs to.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleFactors`: `f.cycleFactors` is a list of disjoint cyclic permutations
that multiply to `f`.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-!
### `cycleOf`
-/
section CycleOf
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of the permutation `f` to which `x` belongs. -/
def cycleOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : Perm α :=
ofSubtype (subtypePerm f fun _ => sameCycle_apply_right.symm : Perm { y // SameCycle f x y })
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of Equiv.Perm.cycleOf
theorem cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) (x y : α) :
cycleOf f x y = if SameCycle f x y then f y else y := by
dsimp only [cycleOf]
split_ifs with h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_mem
exact h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem
exact h
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply
theorem cycleOf_inv (f : Perm α) (x : α) : (cycleOf f x)⁻¹ = cycleOf f⁻¹ x :=
Equiv.ext fun y => by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_inv_apply_right]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_inv Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_inv
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_pow_apply_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro n
induction' n with n hn
· rfl
· rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, cycleOf_apply, hn, if_pos, pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨n, rfl⟩
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_pow_apply_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_pow_apply_self
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_zpow_apply_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) :
∀ n : ℤ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro z
induction' z with z hz
· exact cycleOf_pow_apply_self f x z
· rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_inv, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_pow_apply_self]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_zpow_apply_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_zpow_apply_self
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_apply : SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = f y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _
#align equiv.perm.same_cycle.cycle_of_apply Equiv.Perm.SameCycle.cycleOf_apply
theorem cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle : ¬SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_of_not_same_cycle Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_eq (h : SameCycle f x y) : cycleOf f x = cycleOf f y := by
ext z
rw [Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hz
· exact (h.symm.trans hz).cycleOf_apply.symm
· exact (cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle (mt h.trans hz)).symm
#align equiv.perm.same_cycle.cycle_of_eq Equiv.Perm.SameCycle.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) (k : ℤ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
rw [SameCycle.cycleOf_apply]
· rw [add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply]
· exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_apply_zpow_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) (k : ℕ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self f x k using 1
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_apply_pow_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) : cycleOf f x (f x) = f (f x) := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self f x 1 using 1
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_apply_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_apply_self
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) : cycleOf f x x = f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_self
theorem IsCycle.cycleOf_eq (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) : cycleOf f x = f :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
if h : SameCycle f x y then by rw [h.cycleOf_apply]
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle h,
Classical.not_not.1 (mt ((isCycle_iff_sameCycle hx).1 hf).2 h)]
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle.cycle_of_eq Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_eq_one_iff (f : Perm α) : cycleOf f x = 1 ↔ f x = x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, cycleOf_apply, one_apply]
refine ⟨fun h => (if_pos (SameCycle.refl f x)).symm.trans (h x), fun h y => ?_⟩
by_cases hy : f y = y
· rw [hy, ite_self]
· exact if_neg (mt SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff (by tauto))
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_eq_one_iff Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply (f : Perm α) (x : α) : cycleOf f (f x) = cycleOf f x :=
(sameCycle_apply_right.2 SameCycle.rfl).symm.cycleOf_eq
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_self_apply Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_self_apply
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_pow (f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) (x : α) : cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.pow_left.cycleOf_eq
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_self_apply_pow Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_self_apply_pow
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_zpow (f : Perm α) (n : ℤ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.zpow_left.cycleOf_eq
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_self_apply_zpow Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_self_apply_zpow
protected theorem IsCycle.cycleOf (hf : IsCycle f) : cycleOf f x = if f x = x then 1 else f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rwa [if_pos hx, cycleOf_eq_one_iff]
· rwa [if_neg hx, hf.cycleOf_eq]
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle.cycle_of Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.cycleOf
theorem cycleOf_one (x : α) : cycleOf 1 x = 1 :=
(cycleOf_eq_one_iff 1).mpr rfl
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_one Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_one
theorem isCycle_cycleOf (f : Perm α) (hx : f x ≠ x) : IsCycle (cycleOf f x) :=
have : cycleOf f x x ≠ x := by rwa [SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply]
(isCycle_iff_sameCycle this).2 @fun y =>
⟨fun h => mt h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 this, fun h =>
if hxy : SameCycle f x y then
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hxy
⟨i, by rw [cycleOf_zpow_apply_self, hi]⟩
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy] at h
exact (h rfl).elim⟩
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle_cycle_of Equiv.Perm.isCycle_cycleOf
@[simp]
theorem two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff : 2 ≤ card (cycleOf f x).support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by simpa using (isCycle_cycleOf _ h).two_le_card_support⟩
contrapose! h
rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at h
simp [h]
#align equiv.perm.two_le_card_support_cycle_of_iff Equiv.Perm.two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Factors.lean | 186 | 188 | theorem card_support_cycleOf_pos_iff : 0 < card (cycleOf f x).support ↔ f x ≠ x := by |
rw [← two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff, ← Nat.succ_le_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => Or.resolve_left h.eq_or_lt (card_support_ne_one _).symm, zero_lt_two.trans_le⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
#align_import data.set.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file defines the product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i` along with the diagonal of a
type.
## Main declarations
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun _ => And.decidable
#align set.decidable_mem_prod Set.decidableMemProd
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
#align set.prod_mono Set.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
#align set.prod_mono_left Set.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
#align set.prod_mono_right Set.prod_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
#align set.prod_self_subset_prod_self Set.prod_self_subset_prod_self
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
#align set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self Set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
#align set.prod_subset_iff Set.prod_subset_iff
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
#align set.forall_prod_set Set.forall_prod_set
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
#align set.exists_prod_set Set.exists_prod_set
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact and_false_iff _
#align set.prod_empty Set.prod_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_prod Set.empty_prod
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact true_and_iff _
#align set.univ_prod_univ Set.univ_prod_univ
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.univ_prod Set.univ_prod
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.prod_univ Set.prod_univ
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.singleton_prod Set.singleton_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.prod_singleton Set.prod_singleton
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by simp
#align set.singleton_prod_singleton Set.singleton_prod_singleton
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
#align set.union_prod Set.union_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
#align set.prod_union Set.prod_union
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.inter_prod Set.inter_prod
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.prod_inter Set.prod_inter
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align set.prod_inter_prod Set.prod_inter_prod
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
#align set.disjoint_prod Set.disjoint_prod
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_left Set.Disjoint.set_prod_left
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_right Set.Disjoint.set_prod_right
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp]
#align set.insert_prod Set.insert_prod
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
-- porting note (#10745):
-- was `simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp, Imp.swap]`
simp only [mem_prod, mem_insert_iff, image, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.injEq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hx, rfl|hy⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, hy⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩|⟨hx, hy⟩ := h
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inl rfl⟩
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inr hy⟩
#align set.prod_insert Set.prod_insert
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_eq Set.prod_preimage_eq
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_left Set.prod_preimage_left
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_right Set.prod_preimage_right
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_prod_map_prod Set.preimage_prod_map_prod
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.mk_preimage_prod Set.mk_preimage_prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left Set.mk_preimage_prod_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right Set.mk_preimage_prod_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
#align set.preimage_swap_prod Set.preimage_swap_prod
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
#align set.image_swap_prod Set.image_swap_prod
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
#align set.prod_image_image_eq Set.prod_image_image_eq
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_range_eq Set.prod_range_range_eq
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prod_map {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
#align set.range_prod_map Set.range_prod_map
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_univ_eq Set.prod_range_univ_eq
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_univ_range_eq Set.prod_univ_range_eq
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prod_map]
apply range_comp_subset_range
#align set.range_pair_subset Set.range_pair_subset
theorem Nonempty.prod : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty.prod Set.Nonempty.prod
theorem Nonempty.fst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.1, hx.1⟩
#align set.nonempty.fst Set.Nonempty.fst
theorem Nonempty.snd : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.2, hx.2⟩
#align set.nonempty.snd Set.Nonempty.snd
@[simp]
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
#align set.prod_nonempty_iff Set.prod_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
#align set.prod_eq_empty_iff Set.prod_eq_empty_iff
theorem prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : Set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s ×ˢ t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.prod_sub_preimage_iff Set.prod_sub_preimage_iff
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) '' s ⊆ (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mk_mem_prod (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem g hx)
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a '' t ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right
theorem prod_subset_preimage_fst (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
inter_subset_left
#align set.prod_subset_preimage_fst Set.prod_subset_preimage_fst
theorem fst_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_fst s t
#align set.fst_image_prod_subset Set.fst_image_prod_subset
theorem fst_image_prod (s : Set β) {t : Set α} (ht : t.Nonempty) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t = s :=
(fst_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht
⟨(y, x), ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.fst_image_prod Set.fst_image_prod
theorem prod_subset_preimage_snd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
inter_subset_right
#align set.prod_subset_preimage_snd Set.prod_subset_preimage_snd
theorem snd_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s t
#align set.snd_image_prod_subset Set.snd_image_prod_subset
theorem snd_image_prod {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t = t :=
(snd_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y y_in =>
let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := hs
⟨(x, y), ⟨x_in, y_in⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.snd_image_prod Set.snd_image_prod
theorem prod_diff_prod : s ×ˢ t \ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ = s ×ˢ (t \ t₁) ∪ (s \ s₁) ×ˢ t := by
ext x
by_cases h₁ : x.1 ∈ s₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : x.2 ∈ t₁ <;> simp [*]
#align set.prod_diff_prod Set.prod_diff_prod
/-- A product set is included in a product set if and only factors are included, or a factor of the
first set is empty. -/
theorem prod_subset_prod_iff : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁ ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by rwa [prod_nonempty_iff] at h
refine ⟨fun H => Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have := image_subset (Prod.fst : α × β → α) H
rwa [fst_image_prod _ st.2, fst_image_prod _ (h.mono H).snd] at this
· have := image_subset (Prod.snd : α × β → β) H
rwa [snd_image_prod st.1, snd_image_prod (h.mono H).fst] at this
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, or_false_iff] at H
exact prod_mono H.1 H.2
#align set.prod_subset_prod_iff Set.prod_subset_prod_iff
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ := by
constructor
· intro heq
have h₁ : (s₁ ×ˢ t₁ : Set _).Nonempty := by rwa [← heq]
rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at h h₁
rw [← fst_image_prod s h.2, ← fst_image_prod s₁ h₁.2, heq, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff, ←
snd_image_prod h.1 t, ← snd_image_prod h₁.1 t₁, heq]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty Set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ ∨ (s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (s₁ = ∅ ∨ t₁ = ∅) := by
symm
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (s ×ˢ t) with h | h
· simp_rw [h, @eq_comm _ ∅, prod_eq_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h, true_and_iff,
or_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h
rw [prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty h]
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, prod_eq_empty_iff] at h
simp_rw [h, false_and_iff, or_false_iff]
#align set.prod_eq_prod_iff Set.prod_eq_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_iff_eq (ht : t.Nonempty) : s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ↔ s = s₁ := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_iff, ht.ne_empty, and_true_iff, or_iff_left_iff_imp,
or_false_iff]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align set.prod_eq_iff_eq Set.prod_eq_iff_eq
section Mono
variable [Preorder α] {f : α → Set β} {g : α → Set γ}
theorem _root_.Monotone.set_prod (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
#align monotone.set_prod Monotone.set_prod
theorem _root_.Antitone.set_prod (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
#align antitone.set_prod Antitone.set_prod
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.set_prod (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
#align monotone_on.set_prod MonotoneOn.set_prod
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.set_prod (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
#align antitone_on.set_prod AntitoneOn.set_prod
end Mono
end Prod
/-! ### Diagonal
In this section we prove some lemmas about the diagonal set `{p | p.1 = p.2}` and the diagonal map
`fun x ↦ (x, x)`.
-/
section Diagonal
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α}
lemma diagonal_nonempty [Nonempty α] : (diagonal α).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun x => ⟨_, mem_diagonal x⟩
#align set.diagonal_nonempty Set.diagonal_nonempty
instance decidableMemDiagonal [h : DecidableEq α] (x : α × α) : Decidable (x ∈ diagonal α) :=
h x.1 x.2
#align set.decidable_mem_diagonal Set.decidableMemDiagonal
theorem preimage_coe_coe_diagonal (s : Set α) :
Prod.map (fun x : s => (x : α)) (fun x : s => (x : α)) ⁻¹' diagonal α = diagonal s := by
ext ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
simp [Set.diagonal]
#align set.preimage_coe_coe_diagonal Set.preimage_coe_coe_diagonal
@[simp]
theorem range_diag : (range fun x => (x, x)) = diagonal α := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [diagonal, eq_comm]
#align set.range_diag Set.range_diag
theorem diagonal_subset_iff {s} : diagonal α ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, (x, x) ∈ s := by
rw [← range_diag, range_subset_iff]
#align set.diagonal_subset_iff Set.diagonal_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint : s ×ˢ t ⊆ (diagonal α)ᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
prod_subset_iff.trans disjoint_iff_forall_ne.symm
#align set.prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint Set.prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint
@[simp]
theorem diag_preimage_prod (s t : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align set.diag_preimage_prod Set.diag_preimage_prod
theorem diag_preimage_prod_self (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s = s :=
inter_self s
#align set.diag_preimage_prod_self Set.diag_preimage_prod_self
theorem diag_image (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) '' s = diagonal α ∩ s ×ˢ s := by
rw [← range_diag, ← image_preimage_eq_range_inter, diag_preimage_prod_self]
#align set.diag_image Set.diag_image
theorem diagonal_eq_univ_iff : diagonal α = univ ↔ Subsingleton α := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, eq_univ_iff_forall, Prod.forall, mem_diagonal_iff]
theorem diagonal_eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : diagonal α = univ := diagonal_eq_univ_iff.2 ‹_›
end Diagonal
/-- A function is `Function.const α a` for some `a` if and only if `∀ x y, f x = f y`. -/
theorem range_const_eq_diagonal {α β : Type*} [hβ : Nonempty β] :
range (const α) = {f : α → β | ∀ x y, f x = f y} := by
refine (range_eq_iff _ _).mpr ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl, fun f hf ↦ ?_⟩
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with h|⟨⟨a⟩⟩
· exact hβ.elim fun b ↦ ⟨b, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· exact ⟨f a, funext fun x ↦ hf _ _⟩
end Set
section Pullback
open Set
variable {X Y Z}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y Z$. -/
abbrev Function.Pullback (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) := {p : X × Z // f p.1 = g p.2}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y X$. -/
abbrev Function.PullbackSelf (f : X → Y) := f.Pullback f
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the first factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : X := p.val.1
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the second factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : Z := p.val.2
open Function.Pullback in
lemma Function.pullback_comm_sq (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) :
f ∘ @fst X Y Z f g = g ∘ @snd X Y Z f g := funext fun p ↦ p.2
/-- The diagonal map $\Delta: X \to X \times_Y X$. -/
def toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (x : X) : f.Pullback f := ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
/-- The diagonal $\Delta(X) \subseteq X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.pullbackDiagonal (f : X → Y) : Set (f.Pullback f) := {p | p.fst = p.snd}
/-- Three functions between the three pairs of spaces $X_i, Y_i, Z_i$ that are compatible
induce a function $X_1 \times_{Y_1} Z_1 \to X_2 \times_{Y_2} Z_2$. -/
def Function.mapPullback {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂}
{f₁ : X₁ → Y₁} {g₁ : Z₁ → Y₁} {f₂ : X₂ → Y₂} {g₂ : Z₂ → Y₂}
(mapX : X₁ → X₂) (mapY : Y₁ → Y₂) (mapZ : Z₁ → Z₂)
(commX : f₂ ∘ mapX = mapY ∘ f₁) (commZ : g₂ ∘ mapZ = mapY ∘ g₁)
(p : f₁.Pullback g₁) : f₂.Pullback g₂ :=
⟨(mapX p.fst, mapZ p.snd),
(congr_fun commX _).trans <| (congr_arg mapY p.2).trans <| congr_fun commZ.symm _⟩
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_Z (X \times_Y Z) \to X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@snd X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → f.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback fst g fst (pullback_comm_sq f g) (pullback_comm_sq f g)
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_X (X \times_Y Z) \to Z \times_Y Z$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@fst X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → g.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback snd f snd (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm
open Function.PullbackSelf Function.Pullback
theorem preimage_map_fst_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
@map_fst X Y Z f g ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (@snd X Y Z f g) := by
ext ⟨⟨p₁, p₂⟩, he⟩
simp_rw [pullbackDiagonal, mem_setOf, Subtype.ext_iff, Prod.ext_iff]
exact (and_iff_left he).symm
theorem Function.Injective.preimage_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → X} (inj : g.Injective) :
mapPullback g id g (by rfl) (by rfl) ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (f ∘ g) :=
ext fun _ ↦ inj.eq_iff
theorem image_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (s : Set X) :
toPullbackDiag f '' s = pullbackDiagonal f ∩ Subtype.val ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, hx, hx⟩
· obtain ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ := x
rintro ⟨rfl : x = y, h2x⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ h2x.1
theorem range_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : range (toPullbackDiag f) = pullbackDiagonal f := by
rw [← image_univ, image_toPullbackDiag, univ_prod_univ, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
theorem injective_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : (toPullbackDiag f).Injective :=
fun _ _ h ↦ congr_arg Prod.fst (congr_arg Subtype.val h)
end Pullback
namespace Set
section OffDiag
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} {x : α × α} {a : α}
theorem offDiag_mono : Monotone (offDiag : Set α → Set (α × α)) := fun _ _ h _ =>
And.imp (@h _) <| And.imp_left <| @h _
#align set.off_diag_mono Set.offDiag_mono
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_nonempty : s.offDiag.Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [offDiag, Set.Nonempty, Set.Nontrivial]
#align set.off_diag_nonempty Set.offDiag_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_eq_empty : s.offDiag = ∅ ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← not_nontrivial_iff, offDiag_nonempty.not]
#align set.off_diag_eq_empty Set.offDiag_eq_empty
alias ⟨_, Nontrivial.offDiag_nonempty⟩ := offDiag_nonempty
#align set.nontrivial.off_diag_nonempty Set.Nontrivial.offDiag_nonempty
alias ⟨_, Subsingleton.offDiag_eq_empty⟩ := offDiag_nonempty
#align set.subsingleton.off_diag_eq_empty Set.Subsingleton.offDiag_eq_empty
variable (s t)
theorem offDiag_subset_prod : s.offDiag ⊆ s ×ˢ s := fun _ hx => ⟨hx.1, hx.2.1⟩
#align set.off_diag_subset_prod Set.offDiag_subset_prod
theorem offDiag_eq_sep_prod : s.offDiag = { x ∈ s ×ˢ s | x.1 ≠ x.2 } :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc.symm
#align set.off_diag_eq_sep_prod Set.offDiag_eq_sep_prod
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_empty : (∅ : Set α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp
#align set.off_diag_empty Set.offDiag_empty
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp
#align set.off_diag_singleton Set.offDiag_singleton
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_univ : (univ : Set α).offDiag = (diagonal α)ᶜ :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.off_diag_univ Set.offDiag_univ
@[simp]
theorem prod_sdiff_diagonal : s ×ˢ s \ diagonal α = s.offDiag :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
#align set.prod_sdiff_diagonal Set.prod_sdiff_diagonal
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_diagonal_offDiag : Disjoint (diagonal α) s.offDiag :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ hd ho => ho.2.2 hd
#align set.disjoint_diagonal_off_diag Set.disjoint_diagonal_offDiag
theorem offDiag_inter : (s ∩ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∩ t.offDiag :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_offDiag, mem_inter_iff]
tauto
#align set.off_diag_inter Set.offDiag_inter
variable {s t}
theorem offDiag_union (h : Disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ t.offDiag ∪ s ×ˢ t ∪ t ×ˢ s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_offDiag, mem_union, ne_eq, mem_prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨h0|h0, h1|h1, h2⟩ <;> simp [h0, h1, h2]
· rintro (((⟨h0, h1, h2⟩|⟨h0, h1, h2⟩)|⟨h0, h1⟩)|⟨h0, h1⟩) <;> simp [*]
· rintro h3
rw [h3] at h0
exact Set.disjoint_left.mp h h0 h1
· rintro h3
rw [h3] at h0
exact (Set.disjoint_right.mp h h0 h1).elim
#align set.off_diag_union Set.offDiag_union
theorem offDiag_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ {a} ×ˢ s ∪ s ×ˢ {a} := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, offDiag_union, offDiag_singleton, union_empty, union_right_comm]
rw [disjoint_left]
rintro b hb (rfl : b = a)
exact ha hb
#align set.off_diag_insert Set.offDiag_insert
end OffDiag
/-! ### Cartesian set-indexed product of sets -/
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {α β : ι → Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set ι} {t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {i : ι}
@[simp]
theorem empty_pi (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : pi ∅ s = univ := by
ext
simp [pi]
#align set.empty_pi Set.empty_pi
theorem subsingleton_univ_pi (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Subsingleton) :
(univ.pi t).Subsingleton := fun _f hf _g hg ↦ funext fun i ↦
(ht i) (hf _ <| mem_univ _) (hg _ <| mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ (s : Set ι) : (pi s fun i => (univ : Set (α i))) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ _ _ => mem_univ _
#align set.pi_univ Set.pi_univ
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_ite (s : Set ι) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
(pi univ fun i => if i ∈ s then t i else univ) = s.pi t := by
ext; simp_rw [Set.mem_pi]; apply forall_congr'; intro i; split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem pi_mono (h : ∀ i ∈ s, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : pi s t₁ ⊆ pi s t₂ := fun _ hx i hi => h i hi <| hx i hi
#align set.pi_mono Set.pi_mono
theorem pi_inter_distrib : (s.pi fun i => t i ∩ t₁ i) = s.pi t ∩ s.pi t₁ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [forall_and, mem_pi, mem_inter_iff]
#align set.pi_inter_distrib Set.pi_inter_distrib
theorem pi_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s₁, t₁ i = t₂ i) : s₁.pi t₁ = s₂.pi t₂ :=
h ▸ ext fun _ => forall₂_congr fun i hi => h' i hi ▸ Iff.rfl
#align set.pi_congr Set.pi_congr
theorem pi_eq_empty (hs : i ∈ s) (ht : t i = ∅) : s.pi t = ∅ := by
ext f
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, not_forall, iff_false_iff, mem_pi, Classical.not_imp]
exact ⟨i, hs, by simp [ht]⟩
#align set.pi_eq_empty Set.pi_eq_empty
theorem univ_pi_eq_empty (ht : t i = ∅) : pi univ t = ∅ :=
pi_eq_empty (mem_univ i) ht
#align set.univ_pi_eq_empty Set.univ_pi_eq_empty
theorem pi_nonempty_iff : (s.pi t).Nonempty ↔ ∀ i, ∃ x, i ∈ s → x ∈ t i := by
simp [Classical.skolem, Set.Nonempty]
#align set.pi_nonempty_iff Set.pi_nonempty_iff
theorem univ_pi_nonempty_iff : (pi univ t).Nonempty ↔ ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty := by
simp [Classical.skolem, Set.Nonempty]
#align set.univ_pi_nonempty_iff Set.univ_pi_nonempty_iff
theorem pi_eq_empty_iff : s.pi t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, IsEmpty (α i) ∨ i ∈ s ∧ t i = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, pi_nonempty_iff]
push_neg
refine exists_congr fun i => ?_
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty (α i) <;> simp [*, forall_and, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.pi_eq_empty_iff Set.pi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem univ_pi_eq_empty_iff : pi univ t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, t i = ∅ := by
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, univ_pi_nonempty_iff]
#align set.univ_pi_eq_empty_iff Set.univ_pi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem univ_pi_empty [h : Nonempty ι] : pi univ (fun _ => ∅ : ∀ i, Set (α i)) = ∅ :=
univ_pi_eq_empty_iff.2 <| h.elim fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align set.univ_pi_empty Set.univ_pi_empty
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_univ_pi : Disjoint (pi univ t₁) (pi univ t₂) ↔ ∃ i, Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← pi_inter_distrib, univ_pi_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.disjoint_univ_pi Set.disjoint_univ_pi
theorem Disjoint.set_pi (hi : i ∈ s) (ht : Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i)) : Disjoint (s.pi t₁) (s.pi t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h₁ h₂ => disjoint_left.1 ht (h₁ _ hi) (h₂ _ hi)
#align set.disjoint.set_pi Set.Disjoint.set_pi
theorem uniqueElim_preimage [Unique ι] (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
uniqueElim ⁻¹' pi univ t = t (default : ι) := by ext; simp [Unique.forall_iff]
section Nonempty
variable [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
theorem pi_eq_empty_iff' : s.pi t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t i = ∅ := by simp [pi_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.pi_eq_empty_iff' Set.pi_eq_empty_iff'
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_pi : Disjoint (s.pi t₁) (s.pi t₂) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← pi_inter_distrib, pi_eq_empty_iff']
#align set.disjoint_pi Set.disjoint_pi
end Nonempty
-- Porting note: Removing `simp` - LHS does not simplify
theorem range_dcomp (f : ∀ i, α i → β i) :
(range fun g : ∀ i, α i => fun i => f i (g i)) = pi univ fun i => range (f i) := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ fun x hx => ?_
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ i -
exact ⟨x i, rfl⟩
· choose y hy using hx
exact ⟨fun i => y i trivial, funext fun i => hy i trivial⟩
#align set.range_dcomp Set.range_dcomp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 807 | 810 | theorem insert_pi (i : ι) (s : Set ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
pi (insert i s) t = eval i ⁻¹' t i ∩ pi s t := by |
ext
simp [pi, or_imp, forall_and]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.nat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file deals with prime numbers: natural numbers `p ≥ 2` whose only divisors are `p` and `1`.
## Important declarations
- `Nat.Prime`: the predicate that expresses that a natural number `p` is prime
- `Nat.Primes`: the subtype of natural numbers that are prime
- `Nat.minFac n`: the minimal prime factor of a natural number `n ≠ 1`
- `Nat.exists_infinite_primes`: Euclid's theorem that there exist infinitely many prime numbers.
This also appears as `Nat.not_bddAbove_setOf_prime` and `Nat.infinite_setOf_prime` (the latter
in `Data.Nat.PrimeFin`).
- `Nat.prime_iff`: `Nat.Prime` coincides with the general definition of `Prime`
- `Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime`: a non-unit natural number is
only divisible by `1` iff it is prime
-/
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- `Nat.Prime p` means that `p` is a prime number, that is, a natural number
at least 2 whose only divisors are `p` and `1`. -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed @[pp_nodot]
def Prime (p : ℕ) :=
Irreducible p
#align nat.prime Nat.Prime
theorem irreducible_iff_nat_prime (a : ℕ) : Irreducible a ↔ Nat.Prime a :=
Iff.rfl
#align irreducible_iff_nat_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime 0
| h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align nat.not_prime_zero Nat.not_prime_zero
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime 1
| h => h.ne_one rfl
#align nat.not_prime_one Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : Prime n) : n ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero h
#align nat.prime.ne_zero Nat.Prime.ne_zero
theorem Prime.pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < p :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.pos Nat.Prime.pos
theorem Prime.two_le : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Prime p → 2 ≤ p
| 0, h => (not_prime_zero h).elim
| 1, h => (not_prime_one h).elim
| _ + 2, _ => le_add_self
#align nat.prime.two_le Nat.Prime.two_le
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p → 1 < p :=
Prime.two_le
#align nat.prime.one_lt Nat.Prime.one_lt
lemma Prime.one_le {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : 1 ≤ p := hp.one_lt.le
instance Prime.one_lt' (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (1 < p) :=
⟨hp.1.one_lt⟩
#align nat.prime.one_lt' Nat.Prime.one_lt'
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : p ≠ 1 :=
hp.one_lt.ne'
#align nat.prime.ne_one Nat.Prime.ne_one
theorem Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (m : ℕ) (hm : m ∣ p) :
m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hm
have := pp.isUnit_or_isUnit hn
rw [Nat.isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff] at this
apply Or.imp_right _ this
rintro rfl
rw [hn, mul_one]
#align nat.prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd
theorem prime_def_lt'' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.two_le, h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
-- Porting note: needed to make ℕ explicit
have h1 := (@one_lt_two ℕ ..).trans_le h.1
refine ⟨mt Nat.isUnit_iff.mp h1.ne', fun a b hab => ?_⟩
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff]
apply Or.imp_right _ (h.2 a _)
· rintro rfl
rw [← mul_right_inj' (pos_of_gt h1).ne', ← hab, mul_one]
· rw [hab]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align nat.prime_def_lt'' Nat.prime_def_lt''
theorem prime_def_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m < p, m ∣ p → m = 1 :=
prime_def_lt''.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨fun h l d => (h d).resolve_right (ne_of_lt l), fun h d =>
(le_of_dvd (le_of_succ_le p2) d).lt_or_eq_dec.imp_left fun l => h l d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt Nat.prime_def_lt
theorem prime_def_lt' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m < p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun m =>
⟨fun h m2 l d => not_lt_of_ge m2 ((h l d).symm ▸ by decide), fun h l d => by
rcases m with (_ | _ | m)
· rw [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd d] at p2
revert p2
decide
· rfl
· exact (h le_add_self l).elim d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt' Nat.prime_def_lt'
theorem prime_def_le_sqrt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ≤ sqrt p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt'.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
⟨fun a m m2 l => a m m2 <| lt_of_le_of_lt l <| sqrt_lt_self p2, fun a =>
have : ∀ {m k : ℕ}, m ≤ k → 1 < m → p ≠ m * k := fun {m k} mk m1 e =>
a m m1 (le_sqrt.2 (e.symm ▸ Nat.mul_le_mul_left m mk)) ⟨k, e⟩
fun m m2 l ⟨k, e⟩ => by
rcases le_total m k with mk | km
· exact this mk m2 e
· rw [mul_comm] at e
refine this km (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ (zero_le m)) e
rwa [one_mul, ← e]⟩
#align nat.prime_def_le_sqrt Nat.prime_def_le_sqrt
theorem prime_of_coprime (n : ℕ) (h1 : 1 < n) (h : ∀ m < n, m ≠ 0 → n.Coprime m) : Prime n := by
refine prime_def_lt.mpr ⟨h1, fun m mlt mdvd => ?_⟩
have hm : m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at mdvd
exact mlt.ne' mdvd
exact (h m mlt hm).symm.eq_one_of_dvd mdvd
#align nat.prime_of_coprime Nat.prime_of_coprime
section
/-- This instance is slower than the instance `decidablePrime` defined below,
but has the advantage that it works in the kernel for small values.
If you need to prove that a particular number is prime, in any case
you should not use `by decide`, but rather `by norm_num`, which is
much faster.
-/
@[local instance]
def decidablePrime1 (p : ℕ) : Decidable (Prime p) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ prime_def_lt'
#align nat.decidable_prime_1 Nat.decidablePrime1
theorem prime_two : Prime 2 := by decide
#align nat.prime_two Nat.prime_two
theorem prime_three : Prime 3 := by decide
#align nat.prime_three Nat.prime_three
theorem prime_five : Prime 5 := by decide
theorem Prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h_two : p ≠ 2)
(h_three : p ≠ 3) : 5 ≤ p := by
by_contra! h
revert h_two h_three hp
-- Porting note (#11043): was `decide!`
match p with
| 0 => decide
| 1 => decide
| 2 => decide
| 3 => decide
| 4 => decide
| n + 5 => exact (h.not_le le_add_self).elim
#align nat.prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three Nat.Prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three
end
theorem Prime.pred_pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < pred p :=
lt_pred_iff.2 pp.one_lt
#align nat.prime.pred_pos Nat.Prime.pred_pos
theorem succ_pred_prime {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : succ (pred p) = p :=
succ_pred_eq_of_pos pp.pos
#align nat.succ_pred_prime Nat.succ_pred_prime
theorem dvd_prime {p m : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : m ∣ p ↔ m = 1 ∨ m = p :=
⟨fun d => pp.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd m d, fun h =>
h.elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ one_dvd _) fun e => e.symm ▸ dvd_rfl⟩
#align nat.dvd_prime Nat.dvd_prime
theorem dvd_prime_two_le {p m : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (H : 2 ≤ m) : m ∣ p ↔ m = p :=
(dvd_prime pp).trans <| or_iff_right_of_imp <| Not.elim <| ne_of_gt H
#align nat.dvd_prime_two_le Nat.dvd_prime_two_le
theorem prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq {p q : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (qp : q.Prime) : p ∣ q ↔ p = q :=
dvd_prime_two_le qp (Prime.two_le pp)
#align nat.prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq Nat.prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq
theorem Prime.not_dvd_one {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
Irreducible.not_dvd_one pp
#align nat.prime.not_dvd_one Nat.Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem prime_mul_iff {a b : ℕ} : Nat.Prime (a * b) ↔ a.Prime ∧ b = 1 ∨ b.Prime ∧ a = 1 := by
simp only [iff_self_iff, irreducible_mul_iff, ← irreducible_iff_nat_prime, Nat.isUnit_iff]
#align nat.prime_mul_iff Nat.prime_mul_iff
theorem not_prime_mul {a b : ℕ} (a1 : a ≠ 1) (b1 : b ≠ 1) : ¬Prime (a * b) := by
simp [prime_mul_iff, _root_.not_or, *]
#align nat.not_prime_mul Nat.not_prime_mul
theorem not_prime_mul' {a b n : ℕ} (h : a * b = n) (h₁ : a ≠ 1) (h₂ : b ≠ 1) : ¬Prime n :=
h ▸ not_prime_mul h₁ h₂
#align nat.not_prime_mul' Nat.not_prime_mul'
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_eq {p a : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (a1 : a ≠ 1) : a ∣ p ↔ p = a := by
refine ⟨?_, by rintro rfl; rfl⟩
rintro ⟨j, rfl⟩
rcases prime_mul_iff.mp hp with (⟨_, rfl⟩ | ⟨_, rfl⟩)
· exact mul_one _
· exact (a1 rfl).elim
#align nat.prime.dvd_iff_eq Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_eq
section MinFac
theorem minFac_lemma (n k : ℕ) (h : ¬n < k * k) : sqrt n - k < sqrt n + 2 - k :=
(tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right <| le_sqrt.2 <| le_of_not_gt h).2 <| Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (by decide)
#align nat.min_fac_lemma Nat.minFac_lemma
/--
If `n < k * k`, then `minFacAux n k = n`, if `k | n`, then `minFacAux n k = k`.
Otherwise, `minFacAux n k = minFacAux n (k+2)` using well-founded recursion.
If `n` is odd and `1 < n`, then `minFacAux n 3` is the smallest prime factor of `n`.
By default this well-founded recursion would be irreducible.
This prevents use `decide` to resolve `Nat.prime n` for small values of `n`,
so we mark this as `@[semireducible]`.
In future, we may want to remove this annotation and instead use `norm_num` instead of `decide`
in these situations.
-/
@[semireducible] def minFacAux (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| k =>
if n < k * k then n
else
if k ∣ n then k
else
minFacAux n (k + 2)
termination_by k => sqrt n + 2 - k
decreasing_by simp_wf; apply minFac_lemma n k; assumption
#align nat.min_fac_aux Nat.minFacAux
/-- Returns the smallest prime factor of `n ≠ 1`. -/
def minFac (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if 2 ∣ n then 2 else minFacAux n 3
#align nat.min_fac Nat.minFac
@[simp]
theorem minFac_zero : minFac 0 = 2 :=
rfl
#align nat.min_fac_zero Nat.minFac_zero
@[simp]
theorem minFac_one : minFac 1 = 1 := by
simp [minFac, minFacAux]
#align nat.min_fac_one Nat.minFac_one
@[simp]
theorem minFac_two : minFac 2 = 2 := by
simp [minFac, minFacAux]
theorem minFac_eq (n : ℕ) : minFac n = if 2 ∣ n then 2 else minFacAux n 3 := rfl
#align nat.min_fac_eq Nat.minFac_eq
private def minFacProp (n k : ℕ) :=
2 ≤ k ∧ k ∣ n ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m
theorem minFacAux_has_prop {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) :
∀ k i, k = 2 * i + 3 → (∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m) → minFacProp n (minFacAux n k)
| k => fun i e a => by
rw [minFacAux]
by_cases h : n < k * k <;> simp [h]
· have pp : Prime n :=
prime_def_le_sqrt.2
⟨n2, fun m m2 l d => not_lt_of_ge l <| lt_of_lt_of_le (sqrt_lt.2 h) (a m m2 d)⟩
exact ⟨n2, dvd_rfl, fun m m2 d => le_of_eq ((dvd_prime_two_le pp m2).1 d).symm⟩
have k2 : 2 ≤ k := by
subst e
apply Nat.le_add_left
by_cases dk : k ∣ n <;> simp [dk]
· exact ⟨k2, dk, a⟩
· refine
have := minFac_lemma n k h
minFacAux_has_prop n2 (k + 2) (i + 1) (by simp [k, e, left_distrib, add_right_comm])
fun m m2 d => ?_
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (a m m2 d) with me | ml
· subst me
contradiction
apply (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ml).resolve_left
intro me
rw [← me, e] at d
have d' : 2 * (i + 2) ∣ n := d
have := a _ le_rfl (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd d')
rw [e] at this
exact absurd this (by contradiction)
termination_by k => sqrt n + 2 - k
#align nat.min_fac_aux_has_prop Nat.minFacAux_has_prop
theorem minFac_has_prop {n : ℕ} (n1 : n ≠ 1) : minFacProp n (minFac n) := by
by_cases n0 : n = 0
· simp [n0, minFacProp, GE.ge]
have n2 : 2 ≤ n := by
revert n0 n1
rcases n with (_ | _ | _) <;> simp [succ_le_succ]
simp only [minFac_eq, Nat.isUnit_iff]
by_cases d2 : 2 ∣ n <;> simp [d2]
· exact ⟨le_rfl, d2, fun k k2 _ => k2⟩
· refine
minFacAux_has_prop n2 3 0 rfl fun m m2 d => (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le m2).resolve_left (mt ?_ d2)
exact fun e => e.symm ▸ d
#align nat.min_fac_has_prop Nat.minFac_has_prop
theorem minFac_dvd (n : ℕ) : minFac n ∣ n :=
if n1 : n = 1 then by simp [n1] else (minFac_has_prop n1).2.1
#align nat.min_fac_dvd Nat.minFac_dvd
theorem minFac_prime {n : ℕ} (n1 : n ≠ 1) : Prime (minFac n) :=
let ⟨f2, fd, a⟩ := minFac_has_prop n1
prime_def_lt'.2 ⟨f2, fun m m2 l d => not_le_of_gt l (a m m2 (d.trans fd))⟩
#align nat.min_fac_prime Nat.minFac_prime
theorem minFac_le_of_dvd {n : ℕ} : ∀ {m : ℕ}, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → minFac n ≤ m := by
by_cases n1 : n = 1 <;> [exact fun m2 _ => n1.symm ▸ le_trans (by simp) m2;
apply (minFac_has_prop n1).2.2]
#align nat.min_fac_le_of_dvd Nat.minFac_le_of_dvd
theorem minFac_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < minFac n := by
by_cases n1 : n = 1 <;> [exact n1.symm ▸ (by simp); exact (minFac_prime n1).pos]
#align nat.min_fac_pos Nat.minFac_pos
theorem minFac_le {n : ℕ} (H : 0 < n) : minFac n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd H (minFac_dvd n)
#align nat.min_fac_le Nat.minFac_le
theorem le_minFac {m n : ℕ} : n = 1 ∨ m ≤ minFac n ↔ ∀ p, Prime p → p ∣ n → m ≤ p :=
⟨fun h p pp d =>
h.elim (by rintro rfl; cases pp.not_dvd_one d) fun h =>
le_trans h <| minFac_le_of_dvd pp.two_le d,
fun H => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun n1 => H _ (minFac_prime n1) (minFac_dvd _)⟩
#align nat.le_min_fac Nat.le_minFac
theorem le_minFac' {m n : ℕ} : n = 1 ∨ m ≤ minFac n ↔ ∀ p, 2 ≤ p → p ∣ n → m ≤ p :=
⟨fun h p (pp : 1 < p) d =>
h.elim (by rintro rfl; cases not_le_of_lt pp (le_of_dvd (by decide) d)) fun h =>
le_trans h <| minFac_le_of_dvd pp d,
fun H => le_minFac.2 fun p pp d => H p pp.two_le d⟩
#align nat.le_min_fac' Nat.le_minFac'
theorem prime_def_minFac {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ minFac p = p :=
⟨fun pp =>
⟨pp.two_le,
let ⟨f2, fd, _⟩ := minFac_has_prop <| ne_of_gt pp.one_lt
((dvd_prime pp).1 fd).resolve_left (ne_of_gt f2)⟩,
fun ⟨p2, e⟩ => e ▸ minFac_prime (ne_of_gt p2)⟩
#align nat.prime_def_min_fac Nat.prime_def_minFac
@[simp]
theorem Prime.minFac_eq {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : minFac p = p :=
(prime_def_minFac.1 hp).2
#align nat.prime.min_fac_eq Nat.Prime.minFac_eq
/-- This instance is faster in the virtual machine than `decidablePrime1`,
but slower in the kernel.
If you need to prove that a particular number is prime, in any case
you should not use `by decide`, but rather `by norm_num`, which is
much faster.
-/
instance decidablePrime (p : ℕ) : Decidable (Prime p) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ prime_def_minFac
#align nat.decidable_prime Nat.decidablePrime
theorem not_prime_iff_minFac_lt {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) : ¬Prime n ↔ minFac n < n :=
(not_congr <| prime_def_minFac.trans <| and_iff_right n2).trans <|
(lt_iff_le_and_ne.trans <| and_iff_right <| minFac_le <| le_of_succ_le n2).symm
#align nat.not_prime_iff_min_fac_lt Nat.not_prime_iff_minFac_lt
theorem minFac_le_div {n : ℕ} (pos : 0 < n) (np : ¬Prime n) : minFac n ≤ n / minFac n :=
match minFac_dvd n with
| ⟨0, h0⟩ => absurd pos <| by rw [h0, mul_zero]; decide
| ⟨1, h1⟩ => by
rw [mul_one] at h1
rw [prime_def_minFac, not_and_or, ← h1, eq_self_iff_true, _root_.not_true, or_false_iff,
not_le] at np
rw [le_antisymm (le_of_lt_succ np) (succ_le_of_lt pos), minFac_one, Nat.div_one]
| ⟨x + 2, hx⟩ => by
conv_rhs =>
congr
rw [hx]
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (minFac_pos _)]
exact minFac_le_of_dvd (le_add_left 2 x) ⟨minFac n, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
#align nat.min_fac_le_div Nat.minFac_le_div
/-- The square of the smallest prime factor of a composite number `n` is at most `n`.
-/
theorem minFac_sq_le_self {n : ℕ} (w : 0 < n) (h : ¬Prime n) : minFac n ^ 2 ≤ n :=
have t : minFac n ≤ n / minFac n := minFac_le_div w h
calc
minFac n ^ 2 = minFac n * minFac n := sq (minFac n)
_ ≤ n / minFac n * minFac n := Nat.mul_le_mul_right (minFac n) t
_ ≤ n := div_mul_le_self n (minFac n)
#align nat.min_fac_sq_le_self Nat.minFac_sq_le_self
@[simp]
theorem minFac_eq_one_iff {n : ℕ} : minFac n = 1 ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hn
have := minFac_prime hn
rw [h] at this
exact not_prime_one this
· rintro rfl
rfl
#align nat.min_fac_eq_one_iff Nat.minFac_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem minFac_eq_two_iff (n : ℕ) : minFac n = 2 ↔ 2 ∣ n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact minFac_dvd n
· intro h
have ub := minFac_le_of_dvd (le_refl 2) h
have lb := minFac_pos n
refine ub.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h' => ?_
have := le_antisymm (Nat.succ_le_of_lt lb) (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h')
rw [eq_comm, Nat.minFac_eq_one_iff] at this
subst this
exact not_lt_of_le (le_of_dvd zero_lt_one h) one_lt_two
#align nat.min_fac_eq_two_iff Nat.minFac_eq_two_iff
end MinFac
theorem exists_dvd_of_not_prime {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) (np : ¬Prime n) : ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_dvd _, ne_of_gt (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt n2)).one_lt,
ne_of_lt <| (not_prime_iff_minFac_lt n2).1 np⟩
#align nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime Nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime
theorem exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) (np : ¬Prime n) :
∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ 2 ≤ m ∧ m < n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_dvd _, (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt n2)).two_le,
(not_prime_iff_minFac_lt n2).1 np⟩
#align nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 Nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime2
theorem not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (h1 : m ∣ n) (h2 : m ≠ 1) (h3 : m ≠ n) : ¬Prime n :=
fun h => Or.elim (h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd m h1) h2 h3
theorem not_prime_of_dvd_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (h1 : m ∣ n) (h2 : 2 ≤ m) (h3 : m < n) : ¬Prime n :=
not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne h1 (ne_of_gt h2) (ne_of_lt h3)
theorem not_prime_iff_exists_dvd_ne {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : (¬Prime n) ↔ ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n :=
⟨exists_dvd_of_not_prime h, fun ⟨_, h1, h2, h3⟩ => not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne h1 h2 h3⟩
theorem not_prime_iff_exists_dvd_lt {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : (¬Prime n) ↔ ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ 2 ≤ m ∧ m < n :=
⟨exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 h, fun ⟨_, h1, h2, h3⟩ => not_prime_of_dvd_of_lt h1 h2 h3⟩
theorem exists_prime_and_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ∃ p, Prime p ∧ p ∣ n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_prime hn, minFac_dvd _⟩
#align nat.exists_prime_and_dvd Nat.exists_prime_and_dvd
theorem dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd {a b : ℕ}
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ a → p * a ∣ b) : a ∣ b := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 1
· apply one_dvd
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_prime_and_dvd ha
exact _root_.trans (dvd_mul_left a p) (hdvd p hp.1 hp.2)
#align nat.dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd Nat.dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
/-- Euclid's theorem on the **infinitude of primes**.
Here given in the form: for every `n`, there exists a prime number `p ≥ n`. -/
theorem exists_infinite_primes (n : ℕ) : ∃ p, n ≤ p ∧ Prime p :=
let p := minFac (n ! + 1)
have f1 : n ! + 1 ≠ 1 := ne_of_gt <| succ_lt_succ <| factorial_pos _
have pp : Prime p := minFac_prime f1
have np : n ≤ p :=
le_of_not_ge fun h =>
have h₁ : p ∣ n ! := dvd_factorial (minFac_pos _) h
have h₂ : p ∣ 1 := (Nat.dvd_add_iff_right h₁).2 (minFac_dvd _)
pp.not_dvd_one h₂
⟨p, np, pp⟩
#align nat.exists_infinite_primes Nat.exists_infinite_primes
/-- A version of `Nat.exists_infinite_primes` using the `BddAbove` predicate. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_setOf_prime : ¬BddAbove { p | Prime p } := by
rw [not_bddAbove_iff]
intro n
obtain ⟨p, hi, hp⟩ := exists_infinite_primes n.succ
exact ⟨p, hp, hi⟩
#align nat.not_bdd_above_set_of_prime Nat.not_bddAbove_setOf_prime
theorem Prime.eq_two_or_odd {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p = 2 ∨ p % 2 = 1 :=
p.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one.imp_left fun h =>
((hp.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd 2 (dvd_of_mod_eq_zero h)).resolve_left (by decide)).symm
#align nat.prime.eq_two_or_odd Nat.Prime.eq_two_or_odd
theorem Prime.eq_two_or_odd' {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p = 2 ∨ Odd p :=
Or.imp_right (fun h => ⟨p / 2, (div_add_mod p 2).symm.trans (congr_arg _ h)⟩) hp.eq_two_or_odd
#align nat.prime.eq_two_or_odd' Nat.Prime.eq_two_or_odd'
theorem Prime.even_iff {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : Even p ↔ p = 2 := by
rw [even_iff_two_dvd, prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq prime_two hp, eq_comm]
#align nat.prime.even_iff Nat.Prime.even_iff
theorem Prime.odd_of_ne_two {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h_two : p ≠ 2) : Odd p :=
hp.eq_two_or_odd'.resolve_left h_two
#align nat.prime.odd_of_ne_two Nat.Prime.odd_of_ne_two
theorem Prime.even_sub_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h2 : p ≠ 2) : Even (p - 1) :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := hp.odd_of_ne_two h2; ⟨n, by rw [hn, Nat.add_sub_cancel, two_mul]⟩
#align nat.prime.even_sub_one Nat.Prime.even_sub_one
/-- A prime `p` satisfies `p % 2 = 1` if and only if `p ≠ 2`. -/
theorem Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] : p % 2 = 1 ↔ p ≠ 2 := by
refine ⟨fun h hf => ?_, (Nat.Prime.eq_two_or_odd <| @Fact.out p.Prime _).resolve_left⟩
rw [hf] at h
simp at h
#align nat.prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two Nat.Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two
theorem coprime_of_dvd {m n : ℕ} (H : ∀ k, Prime k → k ∣ m → ¬k ∣ n) : Coprime m n := by
rw [coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one]
by_contra g2
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpdvd⟩ := exists_prime_and_dvd g2
apply H p hp <;> apply dvd_trans hpdvd
· exact gcd_dvd_left _ _
· exact gcd_dvd_right _ _
#align nat.coprime_of_dvd Nat.coprime_of_dvd
theorem coprime_of_dvd' {m n : ℕ} (H : ∀ k, Prime k → k ∣ m → k ∣ n → k ∣ 1) : Coprime m n :=
coprime_of_dvd fun k kp km kn => not_le_of_gt kp.one_lt <| le_of_dvd zero_lt_one <| H k kp km kn
#align nat.coprime_of_dvd' Nat.coprime_of_dvd'
theorem factors_lemma {k} : (k + 2) / minFac (k + 2) < k + 2 :=
div_lt_self (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) (minFac_prime (by
apply Nat.ne_of_gt
apply Nat.succ_lt_succ
apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
)).one_lt
#align nat.factors_lemma Nat.factors_lemma
theorem Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : Coprime p n ↔ ¬p ∣ n :=
⟨fun co d => pp.not_dvd_one <| co.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left (by simp [d]), fun nd =>
coprime_of_dvd fun m m2 mp => ((prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq m2 pp).1 mp).symm ▸ nd⟩
#align nat.prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_not_coprime {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : p ∣ n ↔ ¬Coprime p n :=
iff_not_comm.2 pp.coprime_iff_not_dvd
#align nat.prime.dvd_iff_not_coprime Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_not_coprime
theorem Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ} : ¬Coprime m n ↔ ∃ p, Prime p ∧ p ∣ m ∧ p ∣ n := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro h
exact
⟨minFac (gcd m n), minFac_prime h, (minFac_dvd (gcd m n)).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n),
(minFac_dvd (gcd m n)).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)⟩
· intro h
cases' h with p hp
apply Nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (Prime.one_lt hp.1) hp.2.1 hp.2.2
#align nat.prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd
theorem Prime.dvd_mul {p m n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : p ∣ m * n ↔ p ∣ m ∨ p ∣ n :=
⟨fun H => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => (pp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).dvd_of_dvd_mul_left H,
Or.rec (fun h : p ∣ m => h.mul_right _) fun h : p ∣ n => h.mul_left _⟩
#align nat.prime.dvd_mul Nat.Prime.dvd_mul
theorem Prime.not_dvd_mul {p m n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (Hm : ¬p ∣ m) (Hn : ¬p ∣ n) : ¬p ∣ m * n :=
mt pp.dvd_mul.1 <| by simp [Hm, Hn]
#align nat.prime.not_dvd_mul Nat.Prime.not_dvd_mul
@[simp] lemma coprime_two_left : Coprime 2 n ↔ Odd n := by
rw [prime_two.coprime_iff_not_dvd, odd_iff_not_even, even_iff_two_dvd]
@[simp] lemma coprime_two_right : n.Coprime 2 ↔ Odd n := coprime_comm.trans coprime_two_left
alias ⟨Coprime.odd_of_left, _root_.Odd.coprime_two_left⟩ := coprime_two_left
alias ⟨Coprime.odd_of_right, _root_.Odd.coprime_two_right⟩ := coprime_two_right
theorem prime_iff {p : ℕ} : p.Prime ↔ _root_.Prime p :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.ne_zero, h.not_unit, fun _ _ => h.dvd_mul.mp⟩, Prime.irreducible⟩
#align nat.prime_iff Nat.prime_iff
alias ⟨Prime.prime, _root_.Prime.nat_prime⟩ := prime_iff
#align nat.prime.prime Nat.Prime.prime
#align prime.nat_prime Prime.nat_prime
-- Porting note: attributes `protected`, `nolint dup_namespace` removed
theorem irreducible_iff_prime {p : ℕ} : Irreducible p ↔ _root_.Prime p :=
prime_iff
#align nat.irreducible_iff_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_prime
theorem Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow {p m n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (h : p ∣ m ^ n) : p ∣ m :=
pp.prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow h
#align nat.prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow Nat.Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow
theorem Prime.not_prime_pow' {x n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ¬(x ^ n).Prime :=
not_irreducible_pow hn
#align nat.prime.pow_not_prime' Nat.Prime.not_prime_pow'
theorem Prime.not_prime_pow {x n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : ¬(x ^ n).Prime :=
not_prime_pow' ((two_le_iff _).mp hn).2
#align nat.prime.pow_not_prime Nat.Prime.not_prime_pow
theorem Prime.eq_one_of_pow {x n : ℕ} (h : (x ^ n).Prime) : n = 1 :=
not_imp_not.mp Prime.not_prime_pow' h
#align nat.prime.eq_one_of_pow Nat.Prime.eq_one_of_pow
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Prime.lean | 632 | 635 | theorem Prime.pow_eq_iff {p a k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : a ^ k = p ↔ a = p ∧ k = 1 := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [h.1, h.2, pow_one]⟩
rw [← h] at hp
rw [← h, hp.eq_one_of_pow, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff, pow_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Induced
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
#align_import topology.order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
/-!
# Ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies
Topologies on a fixed type `α` are ordered, by reverse inclusion. That is, for topologies `t₁` and
`t₂` on `α`, we write `t₁ ≤ t₂` if every set open in `t₂` is also open in `t₁`. (One also calls
`t₁` *finer* than `t₂`, and `t₂` *coarser* than `t₁`.)
Any function `f : α → β` induces
* `TopologicalSpace.induced f : TopologicalSpace β → TopologicalSpace α`;
* `TopologicalSpace.coinduced f : TopologicalSpace α → TopologicalSpace β`.
Continuity, the ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies are related as follows:
* The identity map `(α, t₁) → (α, t₂)` is continuous iff `t₁ ≤ t₂`.
* A map `f : (α, t) → (β, u)` is continuous
* iff `t ≤ TopologicalSpace.induced f u` (`continuous_iff_le_induced`)
* iff `TopologicalSpace.coinduced f t ≤ u` (`continuous_iff_coinduced_le`).
Topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology and `⊤` the indiscrete
topology.
For a function `f : α → β`, `(TopologicalSpace.coinduced f, TopologicalSpace.induced f)` is a Galois
connection between topologies on `α` and topologies on `β`.
## Implementation notes
There is a Galois insertion between topologies on `α` (with the inclusion ordering) and all
collections of sets in `α`. The complete lattice structure on topologies on `α` is defined as the
reverse of the one obtained via this Galois insertion. More precisely, we use the corresponding
Galois coinsertion between topologies on `α` (with the reversed inclusion ordering) and collections
of sets in `α` (with the reversed inclusion ordering).
## Tags
finer, coarser, induced topology, coinduced topology
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology
universe u v w
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type u}
/-- The open sets of the least topology containing a collection of basic sets. -/
inductive GenerateOpen (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic : ∀ s ∈ g, GenerateOpen g s
| univ : GenerateOpen g univ
| inter : ∀ s t, GenerateOpen g s → GenerateOpen g t → GenerateOpen g (s ∩ t)
| sUnion : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (∀ s ∈ S, GenerateOpen g s) → GenerateOpen g (⋃₀ S)
#align topological_space.generate_open TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen
/-- The smallest topological space containing the collection `g` of basic sets -/
def generateFrom (g : Set (Set α)) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen := GenerateOpen g
isOpen_univ := GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := GenerateOpen.sUnion
#align topological_space.generate_from TopologicalSpace.generateFrom
theorem isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem {g : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ g) :
IsOpen[generateFrom g] s :=
GenerateOpen.basic s hs
#align topological_space.is_open_generate_from_of_mem TopologicalSpace.isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem
theorem nhds_generateFrom {g : Set (Set α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (generateFrom g) a = ⨅ s ∈ { s | a ∈ s ∧ s ∈ g }, 𝓟 s := by
letI := generateFrom g
rw [nhds_def]
refine le_antisymm (biInf_mono fun s ⟨as, sg⟩ => ⟨as, .basic _ sg⟩) <| le_iInf₂ ?_
rintro s ⟨ha, hs⟩
induction hs with
| basic _ hs => exact iInf₂_le _ ⟨ha, hs⟩
| univ => exact le_top.trans_eq principal_univ.symm
| inter _ _ _ _ hs ht => exact (le_inf (hs ha.1) (ht ha.2)).trans_eq inf_principal
| sUnion _ _ hS =>
let ⟨t, htS, hat⟩ := ha
exact (hS t htS hat).trans (principal_mono.2 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem htS)
#align topological_space.nhds_generate_from TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom
lemma tendsto_nhds_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} {g : Set (Set β)}
{b : β} : Tendsto m f (@nhds β (generateFrom g) b) ↔ ∀ s ∈ g, b ∈ s → m ⁻¹' s ∈ f := by
simp only [nhds_generateFrom, @forall_swap (b ∈ _), tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp,
tendsto_principal]; rfl
@[deprecated] alias ⟨_, tendsto_nhds_generateFrom⟩ := tendsto_nhds_generateFrom_iff
#align topological_space.tendsto_nhds_generate_from TopologicalSpace.tendsto_nhds_generateFrom
/-- Construct a topology on α given the filter of neighborhoods of each point of α. -/
protected def mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen s := ∀ a ∈ s, s ∈ n a
isOpen_univ _ _ := univ_mem
isOpen_inter := fun _s _t hs ht x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩ => inter_mem (hs x hxs) (ht x hxt)
isOpen_sUnion := fun _s hs _a ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hs x hx _ hxa) (subset_sUnion_of_mem hx)
#align topological_space.mk_of_nhds TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis {n : α → Filter α} {ι : α → Sort*} {p : ∀ a, ι a → Prop}
{s : ∀ a, ι a → Set α} (hb : ∀ a, (n a).HasBasis (p a) (s a))
(hpure : ∀ a i, p a i → a ∈ s a i) (hopen : ∀ a i, p a i → ∀ᶠ x in n a, s a i ∈ n x) (a : α) :
@nhds α (.mkOfNhds n) a = n a := by
let t : TopologicalSpace α := .mkOfNhds n
apply le_antisymm
· intro U hU
replace hpure : pure ≤ n := fun x ↦ (hb x).ge_iff.2 (hpure x)
refine mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨{x | U ∈ n x}, fun x hx ↦ hpure x hx, fun x hx ↦ ?_, hU⟩
rcases (hb x).mem_iff.1 hx with ⟨i, hpi, hi⟩
exact (hopen x i hpi).mono fun y hy ↦ mem_of_superset hy hi
· exact (nhds_basis_opens a).ge_iff.2 fun U ⟨haU, hUo⟩ ↦ hUo a haU
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) (a : α) (h₀ : pure ≤ n)
(h₁ : ∀ a, ∀ s ∈ n a, ∀ᶠ y in n a, s ∈ n y) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds n) a = n a :=
nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun a ↦ (n a).basis_sets) h₀ h₁ _
#align topological_space.nhds_mk_of_nhds TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_single [DecidableEq α] {a₀ : α} {l : Filter α} (h : pure a₀ ≤ l) (b : α) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds (update pure a₀ l)) b =
(update pure a₀ l : α → Filter α) b := by
refine nhds_mkOfNhds _ _ (le_update_iff.mpr ⟨h, fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩) fun a s hs => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne a a₀ with (rfl | ha)
· filter_upwards [hs] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne b a with (rfl | hb)
· exact hs
· rwa [update_noteq hb]
· simpa only [update_noteq ha, mem_pure, eventually_pure] using hs
#align topological_space.nhds_mk_of_nhds_single TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds_single
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_filterBasis (B : α → FilterBasis α) (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ x, ∀ n ∈ B x, x ∈ n)
(h₁ : ∀ x, ∀ n ∈ B x, ∃ n₁ ∈ B x, ∀ x' ∈ n₁, ∃ n₂ ∈ B x', n₂ ⊆ n) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds fun x => (B x).filter) a = (B a).filter :=
nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun a ↦ (B a).hasBasis) h₀ h₁ a
#align topological_space.nhds_mk_of_nhds_filter_basis TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds_filterBasis
section Lattice
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- The ordering on topologies on the type `α`. `t ≤ s` if every set open in `s` is also open in `t`
(`t` is finer than `s`). -/
instance : PartialOrder (TopologicalSpace α) :=
{ PartialOrder.lift (fun t => OrderDual.toDual IsOpen[t]) (fun _ _ => TopologicalSpace.ext) with
le := fun s t => ∀ U, IsOpen[t] U → IsOpen[s] U }
protected theorem le_def {α} {t s : TopologicalSpace α} : t ≤ s ↔ IsOpen[s] ≤ IsOpen[t] :=
Iff.rfl
#align topological_space.le_def TopologicalSpace.le_def
theorem le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen {g : Set (Set α)} {t : TopologicalSpace α} :
t ≤ generateFrom g ↔ g ⊆ { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
⟨fun ht s hs => ht _ <| .basic s hs, fun hg _s hs =>
hs.recOn (fun _ h => hg h) isOpen_univ (fun _ _ _ _ => IsOpen.inter) fun _ _ => isOpen_sUnion⟩
#align topological_space.le_generate_from_iff_subset_is_open TopologicalSpace.le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen
/-- If `s` equals the collection of open sets in the topology it generates, then `s` defines a
topology. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : { u | GenerateOpen s u } = s) :
TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen u := u ∈ s
isOpen_univ := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.sUnion
#align topological_space.mk_of_closure TopologicalSpace.mkOfClosure
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : { u | GenerateOpen s u } = s} :
TopologicalSpace.mkOfClosure s hs = generateFrom s :=
TopologicalSpace.ext hs.symm
#align topological_space.mk_of_closure_sets TopologicalSpace.mkOfClosure_sets
theorem gc_generateFrom (α) :
GaloisConnection (fun t : TopologicalSpace α => OrderDual.toDual { s | IsOpen[t] s })
(generateFrom ∘ OrderDual.ofDual) := fun _ _ =>
le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen.symm
/-- The Galois coinsertion between `TopologicalSpace α` and `(Set (Set α))ᵒᵈ` whose lower part sends
a topology to its collection of open subsets, and whose upper part sends a collection of subsets
of `α` to the topology they generate. -/
def gciGenerateFrom (α : Type*) :
GaloisCoinsertion (fun t : TopologicalSpace α => OrderDual.toDual { s | IsOpen[t] s })
(generateFrom ∘ OrderDual.ofDual) where
gc := gc_generateFrom α
u_l_le _ s hs := TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.basic s hs
choice g hg := TopologicalSpace.mkOfClosure g
(Subset.antisymm hg <| le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
#align gi_generate_from TopologicalSpace.gciGenerateFrom
/-- Topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology
and `⊤` the indiscrete topology. The infimum of a collection of topologies
is the topology generated by all their open sets, while the supremum is the
topology whose open sets are those sets open in every member of the collection. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (TopologicalSpace α) := (gciGenerateFrom α).liftCompleteLattice
@[mono]
theorem generateFrom_anti {α} {g₁ g₂ : Set (Set α)} (h : g₁ ⊆ g₂) :
generateFrom g₂ ≤ generateFrom g₁ :=
(gc_generateFrom _).monotone_u h
#align topological_space.generate_from_anti TopologicalSpace.generateFrom_anti
theorem generateFrom_setOf_isOpen (t : TopologicalSpace α) :
generateFrom { s | IsOpen[t] s } = t :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_l_eq t
#align topological_space.generate_from_set_of_is_open TopologicalSpace.generateFrom_setOf_isOpen
theorem leftInverse_generateFrom :
LeftInverse generateFrom fun t : TopologicalSpace α => { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_l_leftInverse
#align topological_space.left_inverse_generate_from TopologicalSpace.leftInverse_generateFrom
theorem generateFrom_surjective : Surjective (generateFrom : Set (Set α) → TopologicalSpace α) :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_surjective
#align topological_space.generate_from_surjective TopologicalSpace.generateFrom_surjective
theorem setOf_isOpen_injective : Injective fun t : TopologicalSpace α => { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).l_injective
#align topological_space.set_of_is_open_injective TopologicalSpace.setOf_isOpen_injective
end Lattice
end TopologicalSpace
section Lattice
variable {α : Type*} {t t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {s : Set α}
theorem IsOpen.mono (hs : IsOpen[t₂] s) (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : IsOpen[t₁] s := h s hs
#align is_open.mono IsOpen.mono
theorem IsClosed.mono (hs : IsClosed[t₂] s) (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : IsClosed[t₁] s :=
(@isOpen_compl_iff α s t₁).mp <| hs.isOpen_compl.mono h
#align is_closed.mono IsClosed.mono
theorem closure.mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : closure[t₁] s ⊆ closure[t₂] s :=
@closure_minimal _ s (@closure _ t₂ s) t₁ subset_closure (IsClosed.mono isClosed_closure h)
theorem isOpen_implies_isOpen_iff : (∀ s, IsOpen[t₁] s → IsOpen[t₂] s) ↔ t₂ ≤ t₁ :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_open_implies_is_open_iff isOpen_implies_isOpen_iff
/-- The only open sets in the indiscrete topology are the empty set and the whole space. -/
theorem TopologicalSpace.isOpen_top_iff {α} (U : Set α) : IsOpen[⊤] U ↔ U = ∅ ∨ U = univ :=
⟨fun h => by
induction h with
| basic _ h => exact False.elim h
| univ => exact .inr rfl
| inter _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ =>
rcases h₁ with (rfl | rfl) <;> rcases h₂ with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
| sUnion _ _ ih => exact sUnion_mem_empty_univ ih, by
rintro (rfl | rfl)
exacts [@isOpen_empty _ ⊤, @isOpen_univ _ ⊤]⟩
#align topological_space.is_open_top_iff TopologicalSpace.isOpen_top_iff
/-- A topological space is discrete if every set is open, that is,
its topology equals the discrete topology `⊥`. -/
class DiscreteTopology (α : Type*) [t : TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The `TopologicalSpace` structure on a type with discrete topology is equal to `⊥`. -/
eq_bot : t = ⊥
#align discrete_topology DiscreteTopology
theorem discreteTopology_bot (α : Type*) : @DiscreteTopology α ⊥ :=
@DiscreteTopology.mk α ⊥ rfl
#align discrete_topology_bot discreteTopology_bot
section DiscreteTopology
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] {β : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_discrete (s : Set α) : IsOpen s := (@DiscreteTopology.eq_bot α _).symm ▸ trivial
#align is_open_discrete isOpen_discrete
@[simp] theorem isClosed_discrete (s : Set α) : IsClosed s := ⟨isOpen_discrete _⟩
#align is_closed_discrete isClosed_discrete
@[simp] theorem closure_discrete (s : Set α) : closure s = s := (isClosed_discrete _).closure_eq
@[simp] theorem dense_discrete {s : Set α} : Dense s ↔ s = univ := by simp [dense_iff_closure_eq]
@[simp]
theorem denseRange_discrete {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} : DenseRange f ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [DenseRange, dense_discrete, range_iff_surjective]
@[nontriviality, continuity]
theorem continuous_of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} : Continuous f :=
continuous_def.2 fun _ _ => isOpen_discrete _
#align continuous_of_discrete_topology continuous_of_discreteTopology
/-- A function to a discrete topological space is continuous if and only if the preimage of every
singleton is open. -/
theorem continuous_discrete_rng [TopologicalSpace β] [DiscreteTopology β]
{f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ∀ b : β, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' {b}) :=
⟨fun h b => (isOpen_discrete _).preimage h, fun h => ⟨fun s _ => by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s, preimage_iUnion₂]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => h _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nhds_discrete (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] : @nhds α _ = pure :=
le_antisymm (fun _ s hs => (isOpen_discrete s).mem_nhds hs) pure_le_nhds
#align nhds_discrete nhds_discrete
theorem mem_nhds_discrete {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s := by rw [nhds_discrete, mem_pure]
#align mem_nhds_discrete mem_nhds_discrete
end DiscreteTopology
theorem le_of_nhds_le_nhds (h : ∀ x, @nhds α t₁ x ≤ @nhds α t₂ x) : t₁ ≤ t₂ := fun s => by
rw [@isOpen_iff_mem_nhds _ _ t₁, @isOpen_iff_mem_nhds α _ t₂]
exact fun hs a ha => h _ (hs _ ha)
#align le_of_nhds_le_nhds le_of_nhds_le_nhds
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-01")]
alias eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds := TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds
#align eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds
theorem eq_bot_of_singletons_open {t : TopologicalSpace α} (h : ∀ x, IsOpen[t] {x}) : t = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun s _ => biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ isOpen_biUnion fun x _ => h x
#align eq_bot_of_singletons_open eq_bot_of_singletons_open
theorem forall_open_iff_discrete {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] :
(∀ s : Set X, IsOpen s) ↔ DiscreteTopology X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨eq_bot_of_singletons_open fun _ => h _⟩, @isOpen_discrete _ _⟩
#align forall_open_iff_discrete forall_open_iff_discrete
theorem discreteTopology_iff_forall_isClosed [TopologicalSpace α] :
DiscreteTopology α ↔ ∀ s : Set α, IsClosed s :=
forall_open_iff_discrete.symm.trans <| compl_surjective.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦
isOpen_compl_iff
theorem singletons_open_iff_discrete {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] :
(∀ a : X, IsOpen ({a} : Set X)) ↔ DiscreteTopology X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨eq_bot_of_singletons_open h⟩, fun a _ => @isOpen_discrete _ _ a _⟩
#align singletons_open_iff_discrete singletons_open_iff_discrete
theorem discreteTopology_iff_singleton_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace α] :
DiscreteTopology α ↔ ∀ x : α, {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [← singletons_open_iff_discrete, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq]
#align discrete_topology_iff_singleton_mem_nhds discreteTopology_iff_singleton_mem_nhds
/-- This lemma characterizes discrete topological spaces as those whose singletons are
neighbourhoods. -/
theorem discreteTopology_iff_nhds [TopologicalSpace α] :
DiscreteTopology α ↔ ∀ x : α, 𝓝 x = pure x := by
simp only [discreteTopology_iff_singleton_mem_nhds, ← nhds_neBot.le_pure_iff, le_pure_iff]
#align discrete_topology_iff_nhds discreteTopology_iff_nhds
theorem discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne [TopologicalSpace α] :
DiscreteTopology α ↔ ∀ x : α, 𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ := by
simp only [discreteTopology_iff_singleton_mem_nhds, nhdsWithin, inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl]
#align discrete_topology_iff_nhds_ne discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne
/-- If the codomain of a continuous injective function has discrete topology,
then so does the domain.
See also `Embedding.discreteTopology` for an important special case. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective
{β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α → β}
(hc : Continuous f) (hinj : Injective f) : DiscreteTopology α :=
forall_open_iff_discrete.1 fun s ↦ hinj.preimage_image s ▸ (isOpen_discrete _).preimage hc
end Lattice
section GaloisConnection
variable {α β γ : Type*}
theorem isOpen_induced_iff [t : TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} :
IsOpen[t.induced f] s ↔ ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ f ⁻¹' t = s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_open_induced_iff isOpen_induced_iff
theorem isClosed_induced_iff [t : TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} :
IsClosed[t.induced f] s ↔ ∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ f ⁻¹' t = s := by
letI := t.induced f
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_induced_iff]
exact compl_surjective.exists.trans (by simp only [preimage_compl, compl_inj_iff])
#align is_closed_induced_iff isClosed_induced_iff
theorem isOpen_coinduced {t : TopologicalSpace α} {s : Set β} {f : α → β} :
IsOpen[t.coinduced f] s ↔ IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_open_coinduced isOpen_coinduced
theorem preimage_nhds_coinduced [TopologicalSpace α] {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {a : α}
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (TopologicalSpace.coinduced π ‹_›) (π a)) : π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
letI := TopologicalSpace.coinduced π ‹_›
rcases mem_nhds_iff.mp hs with ⟨V, hVs, V_op, mem_V⟩
exact mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨π ⁻¹' V, Set.preimage_mono hVs, V_op, mem_V⟩
#align preimage_nhds_coinduced preimage_nhds_coinduced
variable {t t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t' : TopologicalSpace β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
theorem Continuous.coinduced_le (h : Continuous[t, t'] f) : t.coinduced f ≤ t' :=
(@continuous_def α β t t').1 h
#align continuous.coinduced_le Continuous.coinduced_le
theorem coinduced_le_iff_le_induced {f : α → β} {tα : TopologicalSpace α}
{tβ : TopologicalSpace β} : tα.coinduced f ≤ tβ ↔ tα ≤ tβ.induced f :=
⟨fun h _s ⟨_t, ht, hst⟩ => hst ▸ h _ ht, fun h s hs => h _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩⟩
#align coinduced_le_iff_le_induced coinduced_le_iff_le_induced
theorem Continuous.le_induced (h : Continuous[t, t'] f) : t ≤ t'.induced f :=
coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 h.coinduced_le
#align continuous.le_induced Continuous.le_induced
theorem gc_coinduced_induced (f : α → β) :
GaloisConnection (TopologicalSpace.coinduced f) (TopologicalSpace.induced f) := fun _ _ =>
coinduced_le_iff_le_induced
#align gc_coinduced_induced gc_coinduced_induced
theorem induced_mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : t₁.induced g ≤ t₂.induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).monotone_u h
#align induced_mono induced_mono
theorem coinduced_mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : t₁.coinduced f ≤ t₂.coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).monotone_l h
#align coinduced_mono coinduced_mono
@[simp]
theorem induced_top : (⊤ : TopologicalSpace α).induced g = ⊤ :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_top
#align induced_top induced_top
@[simp]
theorem induced_inf : (t₁ ⊓ t₂).induced g = t₁.induced g ⊓ t₂.induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_inf
#align induced_inf induced_inf
@[simp]
theorem induced_iInf {ι : Sort w} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α} :
(⨅ i, t i).induced g = ⨅ i, (t i).induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_iInf
#align induced_infi induced_iInf
@[simp]
theorem coinduced_bot : (⊥ : TopologicalSpace α).coinduced f = ⊥ :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_bot
#align coinduced_bot coinduced_bot
@[simp]
theorem coinduced_sup : (t₁ ⊔ t₂).coinduced f = t₁.coinduced f ⊔ t₂.coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_sup
#align coinduced_sup coinduced_sup
@[simp]
theorem coinduced_iSup {ι : Sort w} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α} :
(⨆ i, t i).coinduced f = ⨆ i, (t i).coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_iSup
#align coinduced_supr coinduced_iSup
theorem induced_id [t : TopologicalSpace α] : t.induced id = t :=
TopologicalSpace.ext <|
funext fun s => propext <| ⟨fun ⟨_, hs, h⟩ => h ▸ hs, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩⟩
#align induced_id induced_id
theorem induced_compose {tγ : TopologicalSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
(tγ.induced g).induced f = tγ.induced (g ∘ f) :=
TopologicalSpace.ext <|
funext fun _ => propext
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨s, hs, h₂⟩, h₁⟩ => h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨preimage g s, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, h ▸ rfl⟩⟩
#align induced_compose induced_compose
theorem induced_const [t : TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} : (t.induced fun _ : β => x) = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top (@continuous_const β α ⊤ t x).le_induced
#align induced_const induced_const
theorem coinduced_id [t : TopologicalSpace α] : t.coinduced id = t :=
TopologicalSpace.ext rfl
#align coinduced_id coinduced_id
theorem coinduced_compose [tα : TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
(tα.coinduced f).coinduced g = tα.coinduced (g ∘ f) :=
TopologicalSpace.ext rfl
#align coinduced_compose coinduced_compose
theorem Equiv.induced_symm {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) :
TopologicalSpace.induced e.symm = TopologicalSpace.coinduced e := by
ext t U
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, isOpen_coinduced]
simp only [e.symm.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image, exists_eq_right, ← preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm]
#align equiv.induced_symm Equiv.induced_symm
theorem Equiv.coinduced_symm {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) :
TopologicalSpace.coinduced e.symm = TopologicalSpace.induced e :=
e.symm.induced_symm.symm
#align equiv.coinduced_symm Equiv.coinduced_symm
end GaloisConnection
-- constructions using the complete lattice structure
section Constructions
open TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
instance inhabitedTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} : Inhabited (TopologicalSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
#align inhabited_topological_space inhabitedTopologicalSpace
instance (priority := 100) Subsingleton.uniqueTopologicalSpace [Subsingleton α] :
Unique (TopologicalSpace α) where
default := ⊥
uniq t :=
eq_bot_of_singletons_open fun x =>
Subsingleton.set_cases (@isOpen_empty _ t) (@isOpen_univ _ t) ({x} : Set α)
#align subsingleton.unique_topological_space Subsingleton.uniqueTopologicalSpace
instance (priority := 100) Subsingleton.discreteTopology [t : TopologicalSpace α] [Subsingleton α] :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨Unique.eq_default t⟩
#align subsingleton.discrete_topology Subsingleton.discreteTopology
instance : TopologicalSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology Empty := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace PEmpty := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology PEmpty := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology PUnit := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology Bool := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology ℕ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace ℤ := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology ℤ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance {n} : TopologicalSpace (Fin n) := ⊥
instance {n} : DiscreteTopology (Fin n) := ⟨rfl⟩
instance sierpinskiSpace : TopologicalSpace Prop :=
generateFrom {{True}}
#align sierpinski_space sierpinskiSpace
theorem continuous_empty_function [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [IsEmpty β]
(f : α → β) : Continuous f :=
letI := Function.isEmpty f
continuous_of_discreteTopology
#align continuous_empty_function continuous_empty_function
theorem le_generateFrom {t : TopologicalSpace α} {g : Set (Set α)} (h : ∀ s ∈ g, IsOpen s) :
t ≤ generateFrom g :=
le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen.2 h
#align le_generate_from le_generateFrom
theorem induced_generateFrom_eq {α β} {b : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
(generateFrom b).induced f = generateFrom (preimage f '' b) :=
le_antisymm (le_generateFrom <| forall_mem_image.2 fun s hs => ⟨s, GenerateOpen.basic _ hs, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 <| le_generateFrom fun _s hs => .basic _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hs))
#align induced_generate_from_eq induced_generateFrom_eq
theorem le_induced_generateFrom {α β} [t : TopologicalSpace α] {b : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ a : Set β, a ∈ b → IsOpen (f ⁻¹' a)) : t ≤ induced f (generateFrom b) := by
rw [induced_generateFrom_eq]
apply le_generateFrom
simp only [mem_image, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp]
exact h
#align le_induced_generate_from le_induced_generateFrom
/-- This construction is left adjoint to the operation sending a topology on `α`
to its neighborhood filter at a fixed point `a : α`. -/
def nhdsAdjoint (a : α) (f : Filter α) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen s := a ∈ s → s ∈ f
isOpen_univ _ := univ_mem
isOpen_inter := fun _s _t hs ht ⟨has, hat⟩ => inter_mem (hs has) (ht hat)
isOpen_sUnion := fun _k hk ⟨u, hu, hau⟩ => mem_of_superset (hk u hu hau) (subset_sUnion_of_mem hu)
#align nhds_adjoint nhdsAdjoint
theorem gc_nhds (a : α) : GaloisConnection (nhdsAdjoint a) fun t => @nhds α t a := fun f t => by
rw [le_nhds_iff]
exact ⟨fun H s hs has => H _ has hs, fun H s has hs => H _ hs has⟩
#align gc_nhds gc_nhds
theorem nhds_mono {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {a : α} (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) :
@nhds α t₁ a ≤ @nhds α t₂ a :=
(gc_nhds a).monotone_u h
#align nhds_mono nhds_mono
theorem le_iff_nhds {α : Type*} (t t' : TopologicalSpace α) :
t ≤ t' ↔ ∀ x, @nhds α t x ≤ @nhds α t' x :=
⟨fun h _ => nhds_mono h, le_of_nhds_le_nhds⟩
#align le_iff_nhds le_iff_nhds
theorem isOpen_singleton_nhdsAdjoint {α : Type*} {a b : α} (f : Filter α) (hb : b ≠ a) :
IsOpen[nhdsAdjoint a f] {b} := fun h ↦
absurd h hb.symm
#align is_open_singleton_nhds_adjoint isOpen_singleton_nhdsAdjoint
theorem nhds_nhdsAdjoint_same (a : α) (f : Filter α) :
@nhds α (nhdsAdjoint a f) a = pure a ⊔ f := by
let _ := nhdsAdjoint a f
apply le_antisymm
· rintro t ⟨hat : a ∈ t, htf : t ∈ f⟩
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds (fun _ ↦ htf) hat
· exact sup_le (pure_le_nhds _) ((gc_nhds a).le_u_l f)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-10")]
alias nhdsAdjoint_nhds := nhds_nhdsAdjoint_same
#align nhds_adjoint_nhds nhdsAdjoint_nhds
theorem nhds_nhdsAdjoint_of_ne {a b : α} (f : Filter α) (h : b ≠ a) :
@nhds α (nhdsAdjoint a f) b = pure b :=
let _ := nhdsAdjoint a f
(isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure _).1 <| isOpen_singleton_nhdsAdjoint f h
@[deprecated nhds_nhdsAdjoint_of_ne (since := "2024-02-10")]
theorem nhdsAdjoint_nhds_of_ne (a : α) (f : Filter α) {b : α} (h : b ≠ a) :
@nhds α (nhdsAdjoint a f) b = pure b :=
nhds_nhdsAdjoint_of_ne f h
#align nhds_adjoint_nhds_of_ne nhdsAdjoint_nhds_of_ne
theorem nhds_nhdsAdjoint [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (f : Filter α) :
@nhds α (nhdsAdjoint a f) = update pure a (pure a ⊔ f) :=
eq_update_iff.2 ⟨nhds_nhdsAdjoint_same .., fun _ ↦ nhds_nhdsAdjoint_of_ne _⟩
theorem le_nhdsAdjoint_iff' {a : α} {f : Filter α} {t : TopologicalSpace α} :
t ≤ nhdsAdjoint a f ↔ @nhds α t a ≤ pure a ⊔ f ∧ ∀ b ≠ a, @nhds α t b = pure b := by
classical
simp_rw [le_iff_nhds, nhds_nhdsAdjoint, forall_update_iff, (pure_le_nhds _).le_iff_eq]
#align le_nhds_adjoint_iff' le_nhdsAdjoint_iff'
theorem le_nhdsAdjoint_iff {α : Type*} (a : α) (f : Filter α) (t : TopologicalSpace α) :
t ≤ nhdsAdjoint a f ↔ @nhds α t a ≤ pure a ⊔ f ∧ ∀ b ≠ a, IsOpen[t] {b} := by
simp only [le_nhdsAdjoint_iff', @isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure α t]
#align le_nhds_adjoint_iff le_nhdsAdjoint_iff
theorem nhds_iInf {ι : Sort*} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α} {a : α} :
@nhds α (iInf t) a = ⨅ i, @nhds α (t i) a :=
(gc_nhds a).u_iInf
#align nhds_infi nhds_iInf
theorem nhds_sInf {s : Set (TopologicalSpace α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (sInf s) a = ⨅ t ∈ s, @nhds α t a :=
(gc_nhds a).u_sInf
#align nhds_Inf nhds_sInf
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: timeouts without `b₁ := t₁`
theorem nhds_inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {a : α} :
@nhds α (t₁ ⊓ t₂) a = @nhds α t₁ a ⊓ @nhds α t₂ a :=
(gc_nhds a).u_inf (b₁ := t₁)
#align nhds_inf nhds_inf
theorem nhds_top {a : α} : @nhds α ⊤ a = ⊤ :=
(gc_nhds a).u_top
#align nhds_top nhds_top
theorem isOpen_sup {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {s : Set α} :
IsOpen[t₁ ⊔ t₂] s ↔ IsOpen[t₁] s ∧ IsOpen[t₂] s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_open_sup isOpen_sup
open TopologicalSpace
variable {γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {ι : Sort*}
theorem continuous_iff_coinduced_le {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₂] f ↔ coinduced f t₁ ≤ t₂ :=
continuous_def
#align continuous_iff_coinduced_le continuous_iff_coinduced_le
theorem continuous_iff_le_induced {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₂] f ↔ t₁ ≤ induced f t₂ :=
Iff.trans continuous_iff_coinduced_le (gc_coinduced_induced f _ _)
#align continuous_iff_le_induced continuous_iff_le_induced
lemma continuous_generateFrom_iff {t : TopologicalSpace α} {b : Set (Set β)} :
Continuous[t, generateFrom b] f ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen]
simp only [isOpen_coinduced, preimage_id', subset_def, mem_setOf]
@[deprecated] alias ⟨_, continuous_generateFrom⟩ := continuous_generateFrom_iff
#align continuous_generated_from continuous_generateFrom
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_induced_dom {t : TopologicalSpace β} : Continuous[induced f t, t] f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.2 le_rfl
#align continuous_induced_dom continuous_induced_dom
theorem continuous_induced_rng {g : γ → α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace γ} :
Continuous[t₁, induced f t₂] g ↔ Continuous[t₁, t₂] (f ∘ g) := by
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, induced_compose]
#align continuous_induced_rng continuous_induced_rng
theorem continuous_coinduced_rng {t : TopologicalSpace α} :
Continuous[t, coinduced f t] f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 le_rfl
#align continuous_coinduced_rng continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_coinduced_dom {g : β → γ} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace γ} :
Continuous[coinduced f t₁, t₂] g ↔ Continuous[t₁, t₂] (g ∘ f) := by
simp only [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, coinduced_compose]
#align continuous_coinduced_dom continuous_coinduced_dom
theorem continuous_le_dom {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} (h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁)
(h₂ : Continuous[t₁, t₃] f) : Continuous[t₂, t₃] f := by
rw [continuous_iff_le_induced] at h₂ ⊢
exact le_trans h₁ h₂
#align continuous_le_dom continuous_le_dom
theorem continuous_le_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} (h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃)
(h₂ : Continuous[t₁, t₂] f) : Continuous[t₁, t₃] f := by
rw [continuous_iff_coinduced_le] at h₂ ⊢
exact le_trans h₂ h₁
#align continuous_le_rng continuous_le_rng
theorem continuous_sup_dom {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁ ⊔ t₂, t₃] f ↔ Continuous[t₁, t₃] f ∧ Continuous[t₂, t₃] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, sup_le_iff]
#align continuous_sup_dom continuous_sup_dom
theorem continuous_sup_rng_left {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₂] f → Continuous[t₁, t₂ ⊔ t₃] f :=
continuous_le_rng le_sup_left
#align continuous_sup_rng_left continuous_sup_rng_left
theorem continuous_sup_rng_right {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₃] f → Continuous[t₁, t₂ ⊔ t₃] f :=
continuous_le_rng le_sup_right
#align continuous_sup_rng_right continuous_sup_rng_right
theorem continuous_sSup_dom {T : Set (TopologicalSpace α)} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[sSup T, t₂] f ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, Continuous[t, t₂] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, sSup_le_iff]
#align continuous_Sup_dom continuous_sSup_dom
theorem continuous_sSup_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : Set (TopologicalSpace β)}
{t : TopologicalSpace β} (h₁ : t ∈ t₂) (hf : Continuous[t₁, t] f) :
Continuous[t₁, sSup t₂] f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 <| le_sSup_of_le h₁ <| continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 hf
#align continuous_Sup_rng continuous_sSup_rng
theorem continuous_iSup_dom {t₁ : ι → TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[iSup t₁, t₂] f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous[t₁ i, t₂] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, iSup_le_iff]
#align continuous_supr_dom continuous_iSup_dom
theorem continuous_iSup_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : ι → TopologicalSpace β} {i : ι}
(h : Continuous[t₁, t₂ i] f) : Continuous[t₁, iSup t₂] f :=
continuous_sSup_rng ⟨i, rfl⟩ h
#align continuous_supr_rng continuous_iSup_rng
theorem continuous_inf_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₂ ⊓ t₃] f ↔ Continuous[t₁, t₂] f ∧ Continuous[t₁, t₃] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, le_inf_iff]
#align continuous_inf_rng continuous_inf_rng
theorem continuous_inf_dom_left {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₃] f → Continuous[t₁ ⊓ t₂, t₃] f :=
continuous_le_dom inf_le_left
#align continuous_inf_dom_left continuous_inf_dom_left
theorem continuous_inf_dom_right {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₂, t₃] f → Continuous[t₁ ⊓ t₂, t₃] f :=
continuous_le_dom inf_le_right
#align continuous_inf_dom_right continuous_inf_dom_right
theorem continuous_sInf_dom {t₁ : Set (TopologicalSpace α)} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β}
{t : TopologicalSpace α} (h₁ : t ∈ t₁) :
Continuous[t, t₂] f → Continuous[sInf t₁, t₂] f :=
continuous_le_dom <| sInf_le h₁
#align continuous_Inf_dom continuous_sInf_dom
theorem continuous_sInf_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {T : Set (TopologicalSpace β)} :
Continuous[t₁, sInf T] f ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, Continuous[t₁, t] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, le_sInf_iff]
#align continuous_Inf_rng continuous_sInf_rng
theorem continuous_iInf_dom {t₁ : ι → TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {i : ι} :
Continuous[t₁ i, t₂] f → Continuous[iInf t₁, t₂] f :=
continuous_le_dom <| iInf_le _ _
#align continuous_infi_dom continuous_iInf_dom
theorem continuous_iInf_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : ι → TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, iInf t₂] f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous[t₁, t₂ i] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, le_iInf_iff]
#align continuous_infi_rng continuous_iInf_rng
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_bot {t : TopologicalSpace β} : Continuous[⊥, t] f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.2 bot_le
#align continuous_bot continuous_bot
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_top {t : TopologicalSpace α} : Continuous[t, ⊤] f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 le_top
#align continuous_top continuous_top
theorem continuous_id_iff_le {t t' : TopologicalSpace α} : Continuous[t, t'] id ↔ t ≤ t' :=
@continuous_def _ _ t t' id
#align continuous_id_iff_le continuous_id_iff_le
theorem continuous_id_of_le {t t' : TopologicalSpace α} (h : t ≤ t') : Continuous[t, t'] id :=
continuous_id_iff_le.2 h
#align continuous_id_of_le continuous_id_of_le
-- 𝓝 in the induced topology
theorem mem_nhds_induced [T : TopologicalSpace α] (f : β → α) (a : β) (s : Set β) :
s ∈ @nhds β (TopologicalSpace.induced f T) a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (f a), f ⁻¹' u ⊆ s := by
letI := T.induced f
simp_rw [mem_nhds_iff, isOpen_induced_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, usub, ⟨v, openv, rfl⟩, au⟩
exact ⟨v, ⟨v, Subset.rfl, openv, au⟩, usub⟩
· rintro ⟨u, ⟨v, vsubu, openv, amem⟩, finvsub⟩
exact ⟨f ⁻¹' v, (Set.preimage_mono vsubu).trans finvsub, ⟨⟨v, openv, rfl⟩, amem⟩⟩
#align mem_nhds_induced mem_nhds_induced
theorem nhds_induced [T : TopologicalSpace α] (f : β → α) (a : β) :
@nhds β (TopologicalSpace.induced f T) a = comap f (𝓝 (f a)) := by
ext s
rw [mem_nhds_induced, mem_comap]
#align nhds_induced nhds_induced
theorem induced_iff_nhds_eq [tα : TopologicalSpace α] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] (f : β → α) :
tβ = tα.induced f ↔ ∀ b, 𝓝 b = comap f (𝓝 <| f b) := by
simp only [ext_iff_nhds, nhds_induced]
#align induced_iff_nhds_eq induced_iff_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhds_induced_of_surjective [T : TopologicalSpace α] {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f)
(a : β) : map f (@nhds β (TopologicalSpace.induced f T) a) = 𝓝 (f a) := by
rw [nhds_induced, map_comap_of_surjective hf]
#align map_nhds_induced_of_surjective map_nhds_induced_of_surjective
end Constructions
section Induced
open TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
variable [t : TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
theorem isOpen_induced_eq {s : Set α} :
IsOpen[induced f t] s ↔ s ∈ preimage f '' { s | IsOpen s } :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_open_induced_eq isOpen_induced_eq
theorem isOpen_induced {s : Set β} (h : IsOpen s) : IsOpen[induced f t] (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨s, h, rfl⟩
#align is_open_induced isOpen_induced
theorem map_nhds_induced_eq (a : α) : map f (@nhds α (induced f t) a) = 𝓝[range f] f a := by
rw [nhds_induced, Filter.map_comap, nhdsWithin]
#align map_nhds_induced_eq map_nhds_induced_eq
theorem map_nhds_induced_of_mem {a : α} (h : range f ∈ 𝓝 (f a)) :
map f (@nhds α (induced f t) a) = 𝓝 (f a) := by rw [nhds_induced, Filter.map_comap_of_mem h]
#align map_nhds_induced_of_mem map_nhds_induced_of_mem
theorem closure_induced {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
a ∈ @closure α (t.induced f) s ↔ f a ∈ closure (f '' s) := by
letI := t.induced f
simp only [mem_closure_iff_frequently, nhds_induced, frequently_comap, mem_image, and_comm]
#align closure_induced closure_induced
| Mathlib/Topology/Order.lean | 873 | 876 | theorem isClosed_induced_iff' {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
IsClosed[t.induced f] s ↔ ∀ a, f a ∈ closure (f '' s) → a ∈ s := by |
letI := t.induced f
simp only [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed, subset_def, closure_induced]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.order.to_interval_mod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [hα : Archimedean α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
#align to_Ico_div toIcoDiv
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul_mem_Ico sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ico_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
#align to_Ioc_div toIocDiv
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul_mem_Ioc sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ico_mod toIcoMod
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ioc_mod toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico toIcoMod_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico' toIcoMod_mem_Ico'
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_mod_mem_Ioc toIocMod_mem_Ioc
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
#align left_le_to_Ico_mod left_le_toIcoMod
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
#align left_lt_to_Ioc_mod left_lt_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
#align to_Ico_mod_lt_right toIcoMod_lt_right
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_right toIocMod_le_right
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_self toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_self toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_self toIcoMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_self toIocMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ico_mod self_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_mod self_sub_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_to_Ico_div_zsmul toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_to_Ioc_div_zsmul toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ico_mod toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ioc_mod toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_iff toIcoMod_eq_iff
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_iff toIocMod_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_left toIcoDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_left toIocDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_left toIcoMod_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_left toIocMod_apply_left
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_right toIcoDiv_apply_right
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_right toIocDiv_apply_right
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_right toIcoMod_apply_right
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_right toIocMod_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul toIcoDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul' toIcoDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul toIocDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul' toIocDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_add toIcoDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_add toIocDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul' toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul toIocDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul' toIocDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right toIcoDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right' toIcoDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right toIocDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right' toIocDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ico_div_add_left toIcoDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ico_div_add_left' toIcoDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left toIocDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left' toIocDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub toIcoDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub' toIcoDiv_sub'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub toIocDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub' toIocDiv_sub'
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add' toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add'
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add' toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add'
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
#align to_Ico_div_neg toIcoDiv_neg
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ico_div_neg' toIcoDiv_neg'
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_neg toIocDiv_neg
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ioc_div_neg' toIocDiv_neg'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul toIcoMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul' toIcoMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul toIocMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul' toIocMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_mod_zsmul_add toIcoMod_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_zsmul_add' toIcoMod_zsmul_add'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_zsmul_add toIocMod_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_mod_zsmul_add' toIocMod_zsmul_add'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_zsmul toIcoMod_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul']
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_zsmul' toIcoMod_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_zsmul toIocMod_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul']
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_zsmul' toIocMod_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b + p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_add_right toIcoMod_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a + p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_add_right' toIcoMod_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b + p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_right toIocMod_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a + p) b = toIocMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_right' toIocMod_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_left toIcoMod_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right', add_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_left' toIcoMod_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_left toIocMod_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right', add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_left' toIocMod_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_sub toIcoMod_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a - p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_sub' toIcoMod_sub'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub toIocMod_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a - p) b = toIocMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub' toIocMod_sub'
theorem toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - c) = toIcoMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_eq_sub toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub
theorem toIocMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - c) = toIocMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_eq_sub toIocMod_sub_eq_sub
theorem toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a (b + c) = toIcoMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_right_eq_add toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add
theorem toIocMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIocMod hp a (b + c) = toIocMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_right_eq_add toIocMod_add_right_eq_add
theorem toIcoMod_neg (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (-b) = p - toIocMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ico_mod_neg toIcoMod_neg
theorem toIcoMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (-a) b = p - toIocMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ico_mod_neg' toIcoMod_neg'
theorem toIocMod_neg (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (-b) = p - toIcoMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIcoMod, toIocDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ioc_mod_neg toIocMod_neg
theorem toIocMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (-a) b = p - toIcoMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ioc_mod_neg' toIocMod_neg'
theorem toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a c - toIcoDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIcoMod_zsmul_add]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_to_Ico_mod toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod
theorem toIocMod_eq_toIocMod : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a c - toIocDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIocMod_zsmul_add]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_to_Ioc_mod toIocMod_eq_toIocMod
/-! ### Links between the `Ico` and `Ioc` variants applied to the same element -/
section IcoIoc
namespace AddCommGroup
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = a :=
modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [toIcoMod_add_zsmul, toIcoMod_apply_left], fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a b, eq_add_of_sub_eq h⟩⟩
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_to_Ico_mod_eq_left AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left
theorem modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIocMod hp a b = a + p := by
refine modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a b + 1, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩
rw [toIocMod_add_zsmul, toIocMod_apply_left]
· rwa [add_one_zsmul, add_left_comm, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_to_Ioc_mod_eq_right AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_left, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left
#align add_comm_group.modeq.to_Ico_mod_eq_left AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_left
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_right, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right
#align add_comm_group.modeq.to_Ico_mod_eq_right AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_right
variable (a b)
open List in
theorem tfae_modEq :
TFAE
[a ≡ b [PMOD p], ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p), toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b,
toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b] := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp]
tfae_have 3 → 2
· rw [← not_exists, not_imp_not]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).trans
((toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).symm
tfae_have 4 → 3
· intro h
rw [← h, Ne, eq_comm, add_right_eq_self]
exact hp.ne'
tfae_have 1 → 4
· intro h
rw [h, eq_comm, toIocMod_eq_iff, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
refine ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right a hp, toIcoDiv hp a b - 1, ?_⟩
rw [sub_one_zsmul, add_add_add_comm, add_right_neg, add_zero]
conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, h]
tfae_have 2 → 1
· rw [← not_exists, not_imp_comm]
have h' := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b
exact fun h => ⟨_, h'.1.lt_of_ne' h, h'.2⟩
tfae_finish
#align add_comm_group.tfae_modeq AddCommGroup.tfae_modEq
variable {a b}
theorem modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p) :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 1
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 2
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_to_Ico_mod_ne_to_Ioc_mod AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 3
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_to_Ico_mod_add_period_eq_to_Ioc_mod AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b :=
(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod _).not_left
#align add_comm_group.not_modeq_iff_to_Ico_mod_eq_to_Ioc_mod AddCommGroup.not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_right_inj,
(zsmul_strictMono_left hp).injective.eq_iff]
#align add_comm_group.not_modeq_iff_to_Ico_div_eq_to_Ioc_div AddCommGroup.not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
sub_sub, sub_right_inj, ← add_one_zsmul, (zsmul_strictMono_left hp).injective.eq_iff]
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_to_Ico_div_eq_to_Ioc_div_add_one AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one
end AddCommGroup
open AddCommGroup
/-- If `a` and `b` fall within the same cycle WRT `c`, then they are congruent modulo `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_inj {c : α} : toIcoMod hp c a = toIcoMod hp c b ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod, modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
#align to_Ico_mod_inj toIcoMod_inj
alias ⟨_, AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod⟩ := toIcoMod_inj
#align add_comm_group.modeq.to_Ico_mod_eq_to_Ico_mod AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod
theorem Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo :
{ b | toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b } = ⋃ z : ℤ, Set.Ioo (a + z • p) (a + p + z • p) := by
ext1;
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_iUnion, ← Set.sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, ←
not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod, modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod hp, not_forall,
Classical.not_not]
#align Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_Union_Ioo Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo
theorem toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b ⩿ toIcoDiv hp a b := by
suffices toIocDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b ∨ toIocDiv hp a b + 1 = toIcoDiv hp a b by
rwa [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, ← Order.succ_eq_iff_covBy]
rw [eq_comm, ← not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv, eq_comm, ←
modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one]
exact em' _
#align to_Ioc_div_wcovby_to_Ico_div toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv
theorem toIcoMod_le_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact zsmul_mono_left hp.le (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le
#align to_Ico_mod_le_to_Ioc_mod toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
theorem toIocMod_le_toIcoMod_add (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left, sub_le_iff_le_add, ← add_one_zsmul,
(zsmul_strictMono_left hp).le_iff_le]
apply (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le_succ
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_to_Ico_mod_add toIocMod_le_toIcoMod_add
end IcoIoc
open AddCommGroup
theorem toIcoMod_eq_self : toIcoMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_self toIcoMod_eq_self
theorem toIocMod_eq_self : toIocMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_self toIocMod_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_to_Ico_mod toIcoMod_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_to_Ioc_mod toIcoMod_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_to_Ioc_mod toIocMod_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_to_Ico_mod toIocMod_toIcoMod
theorem toIcoMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIcoMod hp a) p :=
toIcoMod_add_right hp a
#align to_Ico_mod_periodic toIcoMod_periodic
theorem toIocMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIocMod hp a) p :=
toIocMod_add_right hp a
#align to_Ioc_mod_periodic toIocMod_periodic
-- helper lemmas for when `a = 0`
section Zero
theorem toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIcoMod_neg, neg_zero]
#align to_Ico_mod_zero_sub_comm toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm
theorem toIocMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIocMod_neg, neg_zero]
#align to_Ioc_mod_zero_sub_comm toIocMod_zero_sub_comm
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, zero_add]
#align to_Ico_div_eq_sub toIcoDiv_eq_sub
theorem toIocDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, zero_add]
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_sub toIocDiv_eq_sub
theorem toIcoMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_sub toIcoMod_eq_sub
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_sub toIocMod_eq_sub
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_to_Ioc_mod_zero toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero
theorem toIocMod_add_toIcoMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [_root_.add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_to_Ico_mod_zero toIocMod_add_toIcoMod_zero
end Zero
/-- `toIcoMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ico a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIcoMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' b <| toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIcoMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIcoMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_Ico_mod QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIcoMod hp a b, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_Ico_mod_coe QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_coe
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIcoMod hp a 0, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_Ico_mod_zero QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_zero
/-- `toIocMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ioc a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIocMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' b <| toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIocMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIocMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_Ioc_mod QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIocMod hp a b, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_Ioc_mod_coe QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_coe
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIocMod hp a 0, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_Ioc_mod_zero QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_zero
/-!
### The circular order structure on `α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p`
-/
section Circular
private theorem toIxxMod_iff (x₁ x₂ x₃ : α) : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp 0 (x₂ - x₁) + toIcoMod hp 0 (x₁ - x₃) ≤ p := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_sub, toIocMod_eq_sub _ x₁, add_le_add_iff_right, ← neg_sub x₁ x₃, toIocMod_neg,
neg_zero, le_sub_iff_add_le]
private theorem toIxxMod_cyclic_left {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} (h : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃) :
toIcoMod hp x₂ x₃ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₁ := by
let x₂' := toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂
let x₃' := toIcoMod hp x₂' x₃
have h : x₂' ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' := by simpa [x₃']
have h₂₁ : x₂' < x₁ + p := toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _
have h₃₂ : x₃' - p < x₂' := sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _)
suffices hequiv : x₃' ≤ toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ by
obtain ⟨z, hd⟩ : ∃ z : ℤ, x₂ = x₂' + z • p := ((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).1 rfl).2
rw [hd, toIocMod_add_zsmul', toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_le_add_iff_right]
assumption -- Porting note: was `simpa`
rcases le_or_lt x₃' (x₁ + p) with h₃₁ | h₁₃
· suffices hIoc₂₁ : toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ = x₁ + p from hIoc₂₁.symm.trans_ge h₃₁
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨h₂₁, by simp [x₂', left_le_toIcoMod]⟩, -1, by simp⟩
have hIoc₁₃ : toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' = x₃' - p := by
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 h₁₃, le_of_lt (h₃₂.trans h₂₁)⟩, 1, by simp⟩
have not_h₃₂ := (h.trans hIoc₁₃.le).not_lt
contradiction
private theorem toIxxMod_antisymm (h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c)
(h₁₃₂ : toIcoMod hp a c ≤ toIocMod hp a b) :
b ≡ a [PMOD p] ∨ c ≡ b [PMOD p] ∨ a ≡ c [PMOD p] := by
by_contra! h
rw [modEq_comm] at h
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.2.2] at h₁₂₃
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.1] at h₁₃₂
exact h.2.1 ((toIcoMod_inj _).1 <| h₁₃₂.antisymm h₁₂₃)
private theorem toIxxMod_total' (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp b a ≤ toIocMod hp b c ∨ toIcoMod hp b c ≤ toIocMod hp b a := by
/- an essential ingredient is the lemma saying {a-b} + {b-a} = period if a ≠ b (and = 0 if a = b).
Thus if a ≠ b and b ≠ c then ({a-b} + {b-c}) + ({c-b} + {b-a}) = 2 * period, so one of
`{a-b} + {b-c}` and `{c-b} + {b-a}` must be `≤ period` -/
have := congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp a b) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp c b)
simp only [add_add_add_comm] at this -- Porting note (#10691): Was `rw`
rw [_root_.add_comm (toIocMod _ _ _), add_add_add_comm, ← two_nsmul] at this
replace := min_le_of_add_le_two_nsmul this.le
rw [min_le_iff] at this
rw [toIxxMod_iff, toIxxMod_iff]
refine this.imp (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _) (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _)
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
private theorem toIxxMod_total (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c ∨ toIcoMod hp c b ≤ toIocMod hp c a :=
(toIxxMod_total' _ _ _ _).imp_right <| toIxxMod_cyclic_left _
private theorem toIxxMod_trans {x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ : α}
(h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₁)
(h₂₃₄ : toIcoMod hp x₂ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₂) :
toIcoMod hp x₁ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₁ := by
constructor
· suffices h : ¬x₃ ≡ x₂ [PMOD p] by
have h₁₂₃' := toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h₁₂₃.1)
have h₂₃₄' := toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h₂₃₄.1)
rw [(not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).1 h] at h₂₃₄'
exact toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (h₁₂₃'.trans h₂₃₄')
by_contra h
rw [(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp).1 h] at h₁₂₃
exact h₁₂₃.2 (left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _).le
· rw [not_le] at h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄ ⊢
exact (h₁₂₃.2.trans_le (toIcoMod_le_toIocMod _ x₃ x₂)).trans h₂₃₄.2
namespace QuotientAddGroup
variable [hp' : Fact (0 < p)]
instance : Btw (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) where
btw x₁ x₂ x₃ := (equivIcoMod hp'.out 0 (x₂ - x₁) : α) ≤ equivIocMod hp'.out 0 (x₃ - x₁)
theorem btw_coe_iff' {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} :
Btw.btw (x₁ : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) x₂ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp'.out 0 (x₂ - x₁) ≤ toIocMod hp'.out 0 (x₃ - x₁) :=
Iff.rfl
#align quotient_add_group.btw_coe_iff' QuotientAddGroup.btw_coe_iff'
-- maybe harder to use than the primed one?
theorem btw_coe_iff {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} :
Btw.btw (x₁ : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) x₂ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp'.out x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp'.out x₁ x₃ := by
rw [btw_coe_iff', toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
#align quotient_add_group.btw_coe_iff QuotientAddGroup.btw_coe_iff
instance circularPreorder : CircularPreorder (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) where
btw_refl x := show _ ≤ _ by simp [sub_self, hp'.out.le]
btw_cyclic_left {x₁ x₂ x₃} h := by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h ⊢
apply toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h
sbtw := _
sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw := Iff.rfl
sbtw_trans_left {x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄} (h₁₂₃ : _ ∧ _) (h₂₃₄ : _ ∧ _) :=
show _ ∧ _ by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₄ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄ ⊢
apply toIxxMod_trans _ h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄
#align quotient_add_group.circular_preorder QuotientAddGroup.circularPreorder
instance circularOrder : CircularOrder (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.circularPreorder with
btw_antisymm := fun {x₁ x₂ x₃} h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁ => by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
rw [btw_cyclic] at h₃₂₁
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁
simp_rw [← modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples]
exact toIxxMod_antisymm _ h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁
btw_total := fun x₁ x₂ x₃ => by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff]
apply toIxxMod_total }
#align quotient_add_group.circular_order QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder
end QuotientAddGroup
end Circular
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
/-!
### Connections to `Int.floor` and `Int.fract`
-/
section LinearOrderedField
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α] [FloorRing α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_floor (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = ⌊(b - a) / p⌋ := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp ?_
rw [Set.mem_Ico, zsmul_eq_mul, ← sub_nonneg, add_comm, sub_right_comm, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add,
sub_right_comm _ _ a]
exact ⟨Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ hp, Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ hp⟩
#align to_Ico_div_eq_floor toIcoDiv_eq_floor
theorem toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = -⌊(a + p - b) / p⌋ := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp ?_
rw [Set.mem_Ioc, zsmul_eq_mul, Int.cast_neg, neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add, ← sub_nonneg,
sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
refine ⟨?_, Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ hp⟩
rw [← add_lt_add_iff_right p, add_assoc, add_comm b, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, add_comm (_ * _), ←
sub_lt_iff_lt_add]
exact Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ hp
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_neg_floor toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor
theorem toIcoDiv_zero_one (b : α) : toIcoDiv (zero_lt_one' α) 0 b = ⌊b⌋ := by
simp [toIcoDiv_eq_floor]
#align to_Ico_div_zero_one toIcoDiv_zero_one
theorem toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp a b = a + Int.fract ((b - a) / p) * p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_eq_floor, Int.fract]
field_simp
ring
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_add_fract_mul toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul
theorem toIcoMod_eq_fract_mul (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b = Int.fract (b / p) * p := by
simp [toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_fract_mul toIcoMod_eq_fract_mul
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub_fract_mul (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp a b = a + p - Int.fract ((a + p - b) / p) * p := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor, Int.fract]
field_simp
ring
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_sub_fract_mul toIocMod_eq_sub_fract_mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 1,041 | 1,042 | theorem toIcoMod_zero_one (b : α) : toIcoMod (zero_lt_one' α) 0 b = Int.fract b := by |
simp [toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.MkIffOfInductiveProp
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
#align_import logic.small.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d012cd09a9b256d870751284dd6a29882b0be105"
/-!
# Small types
A type is `w`-small if there exists an equivalence to some `S : Type w`.
We provide a noncomputable model `Shrink α : Type w`, and `equivShrink α : α ≃ Shrink α`.
A subsingleton type is `w`-small for any `w`.
If `α ≃ β`, then `Small.{w} α ↔ Small.{w} β`.
See `Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic` for further instances and theorems.
-/
universe u w v v'
/-- A type is `Small.{w}` if there exists an equivalence to some `S : Type w`.
-/
@[mk_iff, pp_with_univ]
class Small (α : Type v) : Prop where
/-- If a type is `Small.{w}`, then there exists an equivalence with some `S : Type w` -/
equiv_small : ∃ S : Type w, Nonempty (α ≃ S)
#align small Small
/-- Constructor for `Small α` from an explicit witness type and equivalence.
-/
theorem Small.mk' {α : Type v} {S : Type w} (e : α ≃ S) : Small.{w} α :=
⟨⟨S, ⟨e⟩⟩⟩
#align small.mk' Small.mk'
/-- An arbitrarily chosen model in `Type w` for a `w`-small type.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Shrink (α : Type v) [Small.{w} α] : Type w :=
Classical.choose (@Small.equiv_small α _)
#align shrink Shrink
/-- The noncomputable equivalence between a `w`-small type and a model.
-/
noncomputable def equivShrink (α : Type v) [Small.{w} α] : α ≃ Shrink α :=
Nonempty.some (Classical.choose_spec (@Small.equiv_small α _))
#align equiv_shrink equivShrink
@[ext]
| Mathlib/Logic/Small/Defs.lean | 56 | 58 | theorem Shrink.ext {α : Type v} [Small.{w} α] {x y : Shrink α}
(w : (equivShrink _).symm x = (equivShrink _).symm y) : x = y := by |
simpa using w
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.finite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Finite sets
This file defines predicates for finite and infinite sets and provides
`Fintype` instances for many set constructions. It also proves basic facts
about finite sets and gives ways to manipulate `Set.Finite` expressions.
## Main definitions
* `Set.Finite : Set α → Prop`
* `Set.Infinite : Set α → Prop`
* `Set.toFinite` to prove `Set.Finite` for a `Set` from a `Finite` instance.
* `Set.Finite.toFinset` to noncomputably produce a `Finset` from a `Set.Finite` proof.
(See `Set.toFinset` for a computable version.)
## Implementation
A finite set is defined to be a set whose coercion to a type has a `Finite` instance.
There are two components to finiteness constructions. The first is `Fintype` instances for each
construction. This gives a way to actually compute a `Finset` that represents the set, and these
may be accessed using `set.toFinset`. This gets the `Finset` in the correct form, since otherwise
`Finset.univ : Finset s` is a `Finset` for the subtype for `s`. The second component is
"constructors" for `Set.Finite` that give proofs that `Fintype` instances exist classically given
other `Set.Finite` proofs. Unlike the `Fintype` instances, these *do not* use any decidability
instances since they do not compute anything.
## Tags
finite sets
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedRing
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set Function
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace Set
/-- A set is finite if the corresponding `Subtype` is finite,
i.e., if there exists a natural `n : ℕ` and an equivalence `s ≃ Fin n`. -/
protected def Finite (s : Set α) : Prop := Finite s
#align set.finite Set.Finite
-- The `protected` attribute does not take effect within the same namespace block.
end Set
namespace Set
theorem finite_def {s : Set α} : s.Finite ↔ Nonempty (Fintype s) :=
finite_iff_nonempty_fintype s
#align set.finite_def Set.finite_def
protected alias ⟨Finite.nonempty_fintype, _⟩ := finite_def
#align set.finite.nonempty_fintype Set.Finite.nonempty_fintype
theorem finite_coe_iff {s : Set α} : Finite s ↔ s.Finite := .rfl
#align set.finite_coe_iff Set.finite_coe_iff
/-- Constructor for `Set.Finite` using a `Finite` instance. -/
theorem toFinite (s : Set α) [Finite s] : s.Finite := ‹_›
#align set.to_finite Set.toFinite
/-- Construct a `Finite` instance for a `Set` from a `Finset` with the same elements. -/
protected theorem Finite.ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) : p.Finite :=
have := Fintype.ofFinset s H; p.toFinite
#align set.finite.of_finset Set.Finite.ofFinset
/-- Projection of `Set.Finite` to its `Finite` instance.
This is intended to be used with dot notation.
See also `Set.Finite.Fintype` and `Set.Finite.nonempty_fintype`. -/
protected theorem Finite.to_subtype {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Finite s := h
#align set.finite.to_subtype Set.Finite.to_subtype
/-- A finite set coerced to a type is a `Fintype`.
This is the `Fintype` projection for a `Set.Finite`.
Note that because `Finite` isn't a typeclass, this definition will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
protected noncomputable def Finite.fintype {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Fintype s :=
h.nonempty_fintype.some
#align set.finite.fintype Set.Finite.fintype
/-- Using choice, get the `Finset` that represents this `Set`. -/
protected noncomputable def Finite.toFinset {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Finset α :=
@Set.toFinset _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset
theorem Finite.toFinset_eq_toFinset {s : Set α} [Fintype s] (h : s.Finite) :
h.toFinset = s.toFinset := by
-- Porting note: was `rw [Finite.toFinset]; congr`
-- in Lean 4, a goal is left after `congr`
have : h.fintype = ‹_› := Subsingleton.elim _ _
rw [Finite.toFinset, this]
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinite_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : s.toFinite.toFinset = s.toFinset :=
s.toFinite.toFinset_eq_toFinset
#align set.to_finite_to_finset Set.toFinite_toFinset
theorem Finite.exists_finset {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) :
∃ s' : Finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases h.nonempty_fintype
exact ⟨s.toFinset, fun _ => mem_toFinset⟩
#align set.finite.exists_finset Set.Finite.exists_finset
theorem Finite.exists_finset_coe {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : ∃ s' : Finset α, ↑s' = s := by
cases h.nonempty_fintype
exact ⟨s.toFinset, s.coe_toFinset⟩
#align set.finite.exists_finset_coe Set.Finite.exists_finset_coe
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Finset α) (↑) Set.Finite where prf _ hs := hs.exists_finset_coe
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite.
This is protected so that it does not conflict with global `Infinite`. -/
protected def Infinite (s : Set α) : Prop :=
¬s.Finite
#align set.infinite Set.Infinite
@[simp]
theorem not_infinite {s : Set α} : ¬s.Infinite ↔ s.Finite :=
not_not
#align set.not_infinite Set.not_infinite
alias ⟨_, Finite.not_infinite⟩ := not_infinite
#align set.finite.not_infinite Set.Finite.not_infinite
attribute [simp] Finite.not_infinite
/-- See also `finite_or_infinite`, `fintypeOrInfinite`. -/
protected theorem finite_or_infinite (s : Set α) : s.Finite ∨ s.Infinite :=
em _
#align set.finite_or_infinite Set.finite_or_infinite
protected theorem infinite_or_finite (s : Set α) : s.Infinite ∨ s.Finite :=
em' _
#align set.infinite_or_finite Set.infinite_or_finite
/-! ### Basic properties of `Set.Finite.toFinset` -/
namespace Finite
variable {s t : Set α} {a : α} (hs : s.Finite) {ht : t.Finite}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_toFinset : a ∈ hs.toFinset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype _
#align set.finite.mem_to_finset Set.Finite.mem_toFinset
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_toFinset : (hs.toFinset : Set α) = s :=
@coe_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype
#align set.finite.coe_to_finset Set.Finite.coe_toFinset
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_nonempty : hs.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Finset.coe_nonempty, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_nonempty Set.Finite.toFinset_nonempty
/-- Note that this is an equality of types not holding definitionally. Use wisely. -/
theorem coeSort_toFinset : ↥hs.toFinset = ↥s := by
rw [← Finset.coe_sort_coe _, hs.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.coe_sort_to_finset Set.Finite.coeSort_toFinset
/-- The identity map, bundled as an equivalence between the subtypes of `s : Set α` and of
`h.toFinset : Finset α`, where `h` is a proof of finiteness of `s`. -/
@[simps!] def subtypeEquivToFinset : {x // x ∈ s} ≃ {x // x ∈ hs.toFinset} :=
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv fun _ ↦ hs.mem_toFinset.symm
variable {hs}
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_inj : hs.toFinset = ht.toFinset ↔ s = t :=
@toFinset_inj _ _ _ hs.fintype ht.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_inj Set.Finite.toFinset_inj
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_subset {t : Finset α} : hs.toFinset ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_subset Set.Finite.toFinset_subset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_ssubset {t : Finset α} : hs.toFinset ⊂ t ↔ s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_ssubset Set.Finite.toFinset_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem subset_toFinset {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ht.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.subset_to_finset Set.Finite.subset_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_toFinset {s : Finset α} : s ⊂ ht.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.ssubset_to_finset Set.Finite.ssubset_toFinset
@[mono]
protected theorem toFinset_subset_toFinset : hs.toFinset ⊆ ht.toFinset ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_subset_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset
@[mono]
protected theorem toFinset_ssubset_toFinset : hs.toFinset ⊂ ht.toFinset ↔ s ⊂ t := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_ssubset_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
alias ⟨_, toFinset_mono⟩ := Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset
#align set.finite.to_finset_mono Set.Finite.toFinset_mono
alias ⟨_, toFinset_strictMono⟩ := Finite.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
#align set.finite.to_finset_strict_mono Set.Finite.toFinset_strictMono
-- Porting note: attribute [protected] doesn't work
-- attribute [protected] toFinset_mono toFinset_strictMono
-- Porting note: `simp` can simplify LHS but then it simplifies something
-- in the generated `Fintype {x | p x}` instance and fails to apply `Set.toFinset_setOf`
@[simp high]
protected theorem toFinset_setOf [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : { x | p x }.Finite) : h.toFinset = Finset.univ.filter p := by
ext
-- Porting note: `simp` doesn't use the `simp` lemma `Set.toFinset_setOf` without the `_`
simp [Set.toFinset_setOf _]
#align set.finite.to_finset_set_of Set.Finite.toFinset_setOf
@[simp]
nonrec theorem disjoint_toFinset {hs : s.Finite} {ht : t.Finite} :
Disjoint hs.toFinset ht.toFinset ↔ Disjoint s t :=
@disjoint_toFinset _ _ _ hs.fintype ht.fintype
#align set.finite.disjoint_to_finset Set.Finite.disjoint_toFinset
protected theorem toFinset_inter [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∩ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∩ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_inter Set.Finite.toFinset_inter
protected theorem toFinset_union [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∪ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∪ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_union Set.Finite.toFinset_union
protected theorem toFinset_diff [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s \ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset \ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_diff Set.Finite.toFinset_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
protected theorem toFinset_symmDiff [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∆ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∆ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp [mem_symmDiff, Finset.mem_symmDiff]
#align set.finite.to_finset_symm_diff Set.Finite.toFinset_symmDiff
protected theorem toFinset_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (hs : s.Finite) (h : sᶜ.Finite) :
h.toFinset = hs.toFinsetᶜ := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_compl Set.Finite.toFinset_compl
protected theorem toFinset_univ [Fintype α] (h : (Set.univ : Set α).Finite) :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ := by
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_univ Set.Finite.toFinset_univ
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_eq_empty {h : s.Finite} : h.toFinset = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
@toFinset_eq_empty _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_empty Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_empty
protected theorem toFinset_empty (h : (∅ : Set α).Finite) : h.toFinset = ∅ := by
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_empty Set.Finite.toFinset_empty
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_eq_univ [Fintype α] {h : s.Finite} :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ ↔ s = univ :=
@toFinset_eq_univ _ _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_univ Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_univ
protected theorem toFinset_image [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).Finite) :
h.toFinset = hs.toFinset.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_image Set.Finite.toFinset_image
-- Porting note (#10618): now `simp` can prove it but it needs the `fintypeRange` instance
-- from the next section
protected theorem toFinset_range [DecidableEq α] [Fintype β] (f : β → α) (h : (range f).Finite) :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_range Set.Finite.toFinset_range
end Finite
/-! ### Fintype instances
Every instance here should have a corresponding `Set.Finite` constructor in the next section.
-/
section FintypeInstances
instance fintypeUniv [Fintype α] : Fintype (@univ α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv α (Equiv.Set.univ α).symm
#align set.fintype_univ Set.fintypeUniv
/-- If `(Set.univ : Set α)` is finite then `α` is a finite type. -/
noncomputable def fintypeOfFiniteUniv (H : (univ (α := α)).Finite) : Fintype α :=
@Fintype.ofEquiv _ (univ : Set α) H.fintype (Equiv.Set.univ _)
#align set.fintype_of_finite_univ Set.fintypeOfFiniteUniv
instance fintypeUnion [DecidableEq α] (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ∪ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_union Set.fintypeUnion
instance fintypeSep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred p] :
Fintype ({ a ∈ s | p a } : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.filter p) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_sep Set.fintypeSep
instance fintypeInter (s t : Set α) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ∩ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_inter Set.fintypeInter
/-- A `Fintype` instance for set intersection where the left set has a `Fintype` instance. -/
instance fintypeInterOfLeft (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.filter (· ∈ t)) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_inter_of_left Set.fintypeInterOfLeft
/-- A `Fintype` instance for set intersection where the right set has a `Fintype` instance. -/
instance fintypeInterOfRight (s t : Set α) [Fintype t] [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (t.toFinset.filter (· ∈ s)) <| by simp [and_comm]
#align set.fintype_inter_of_right Set.fintypeInterOfRight
/-- A `Fintype` structure on a set defines a `Fintype` structure on its subset. -/
def fintypeSubset (s : Set α) {t : Set α} [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (h : t ⊆ s) :
Fintype t := by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
apply Set.fintypeInterOfLeft
#align set.fintype_subset Set.fintypeSubset
instance fintypeDiff [DecidableEq α] (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s \ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset \ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_diff Set.fintypeDiff
instance fintypeDiffLeft (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
Fintype (s \ t : Set α) :=
Set.fintypeSep s (· ∈ tᶜ)
#align set.fintype_diff_left Set.fintypeDiffLeft
instance fintypeiUnion [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (PLift ι)] (f : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Fintype (f i)] :
Fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.univ.biUnion fun i : PLift ι => (f i.down).toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_Union Set.fintypeiUnion
instance fintypesUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Set (Set α)} [Fintype s]
[H : ∀ t : s, Fintype (t : Set α)] : Fintype (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact @Set.fintypeiUnion _ _ _ _ _ H
#align set.fintype_sUnion Set.fintypesUnion
/-- A union of sets with `Fintype` structure over a set with `Fintype` structure has a `Fintype`
structure. -/
def fintypeBiUnion [DecidableEq α] {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Fintype s] (t : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ s, Fintype (t i)) : Fintype (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
haveI : ∀ i : toFinset s, Fintype (t i) := fun i => H i (mem_toFinset.1 i.2)
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.attach.biUnion fun x => (t x).toFinset) fun x => by simp
#align set.fintype_bUnion Set.fintypeBiUnion
instance fintypeBiUnion' [DecidableEq α] {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Fintype s] (t : ι → Set α)
[∀ i, Fintype (t i)] : Fintype (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.biUnion fun x => (t x).toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_bUnion' Set.fintypeBiUnion'
section monad
attribute [local instance] Set.monad
/-- If `s : Set α` is a set with `Fintype` instance and `f : α → Set β` is a function such that
each `f a`, `a ∈ s`, has a `Fintype` structure, then `s >>= f` has a `Fintype` structure. -/
def fintypeBind {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (f : α → Set β)
(H : ∀ a ∈ s, Fintype (f a)) : Fintype (s >>= f) :=
Set.fintypeBiUnion s f H
#align set.fintype_bind Set.fintypeBind
instance fintypeBind' {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (f : α → Set β)
[∀ a, Fintype (f a)] : Fintype (s >>= f) :=
Set.fintypeBiUnion' s f
#align set.fintype_bind' Set.fintypeBind'
end monad
instance fintypeEmpty : Fintype (∅ : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset ∅ <| by simp
#align set.fintype_empty Set.fintypeEmpty
instance fintypeSingleton (a : α) : Fintype ({a} : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset {a} <| by simp
#align set.fintype_singleton Set.fintypeSingleton
instance fintypePure : ∀ a : α, Fintype (pure a : Set α) :=
Set.fintypeSingleton
#align set.fintype_pure Set.fintypePure
/-- A `Fintype` instance for inserting an element into a `Set` using the
corresponding `insert` function on `Finset`. This requires `DecidableEq α`.
There is also `Set.fintypeInsert'` when `a ∈ s` is decidable. -/
instance fintypeInsert (a : α) (s : Set α) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (insert a s.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_insert Set.fintypeInsert
/-- A `Fintype` structure on `insert a s` when inserting a new element. -/
def fintypeInsertOfNotMem {a : α} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset ⟨a ::ₘ s.toFinset.1, s.toFinset.nodup.cons (by simp [h])⟩ <| by simp
#align set.fintype_insert_of_not_mem Set.fintypeInsertOfNotMem
/-- A `Fintype` structure on `insert a s` when inserting a pre-existing element. -/
def fintypeInsertOfMem {a : α} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (h : a ∈ s) : Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset s.toFinset <| by simp [h]
#align set.fintype_insert_of_mem Set.fintypeInsertOfMem
/-- The `Set.fintypeInsert` instance requires decidable equality, but when `a ∈ s`
is decidable for this particular `a` we can still get a `Fintype` instance by using
`Set.fintypeInsertOfNotMem` or `Set.fintypeInsertOfMem`.
This instance pre-dates `Set.fintypeInsert`, and it is less efficient.
When `Set.decidableMemOfFintype` is made a local instance, then this instance would
override `Set.fintypeInsert` if not for the fact that its priority has been
adjusted. See Note [lower instance priority]. -/
instance (priority := 100) fintypeInsert' (a : α) (s : Set α) [Decidable <| a ∈ s] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then fintypeInsertOfMem s h else fintypeInsertOfNotMem s h
#align set.fintype_insert' Set.fintypeInsert'
instance fintypeImage [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Fintype s] : Fintype (f '' s) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.image f) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_image Set.fintypeImage
/-- If a function `f` has a partial inverse and sends a set `s` to a set with `[Fintype]` instance,
then `s` has a `Fintype` structure as well. -/
def fintypeOfFintypeImage (s : Set α) {f : α → β} {g} (I : IsPartialInv f g) [Fintype (f '' s)] :
Fintype s :=
Fintype.ofFinset ⟨_, (f '' s).toFinset.2.filterMap g <| injective_of_isPartialInv_right I⟩
fun a => by
suffices (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s by
simpa [exists_and_left.symm, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
rw [exists_swap]
suffices (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s by simpa [and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
simp [I _, (injective_of_isPartialInv I).eq_iff]
#align set.fintype_of_fintype_image Set.fintypeOfFintypeImage
instance fintypeRange [DecidableEq α] (f : ι → α) [Fintype (PLift ι)] : Fintype (range f) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.univ.image <| f ∘ PLift.down) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_range Set.fintypeRange
instance fintypeMap {α β} [DecidableEq β] :
∀ (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Fintype s], Fintype (f <$> s) :=
Set.fintypeImage
#align set.fintype_map Set.fintypeMap
instance fintypeLTNat (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i | i < n } :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.range n) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_lt_nat Set.fintypeLTNat
instance fintypeLENat (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i | i ≤ n } := by
simpa [Nat.lt_succ_iff] using Set.fintypeLTNat (n + 1)
#align set.fintype_le_nat Set.fintypeLENat
/-- This is not an instance so that it does not conflict with the one
in `Mathlib/Order/LocallyFinite.lean`. -/
def Nat.fintypeIio (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Iio n) :=
Set.fintypeLTNat n
#align set.nat.fintype_Iio Set.Nat.fintypeIio
instance fintypeProd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ×ˢ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_prod Set.fintypeProd
instance fintypeOffDiag [DecidableEq α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype s.offDiag :=
Fintype.ofFinset s.toFinset.offDiag <| by simp
#align set.fintype_off_diag Set.fintypeOffDiag
/-- `image2 f s t` is `Fintype` if `s` and `t` are. -/
instance fintypeImage2 [DecidableEq γ] (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [hs : Fintype s]
[ht : Fintype t] : Fintype (image2 f s t : Set γ) := by
rw [← image_prod]
apply Set.fintypeImage
#align set.fintype_image2 Set.fintypeImage2
instance fintypeSeq [DecidableEq β] (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Fintype f] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (f.seq s) := by
rw [seq_def]
apply Set.fintypeBiUnion'
#align set.fintype_seq Set.fintypeSeq
instance fintypeSeq' {α β : Type u} [DecidableEq β] (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Fintype f]
[Fintype s] : Fintype (f <*> s) :=
Set.fintypeSeq f s
#align set.fintype_seq' Set.fintypeSeq'
instance fintypeMemFinset (s : Finset α) : Fintype { a | a ∈ s } :=
Finset.fintypeCoeSort s
#align set.fintype_mem_finset Set.fintypeMemFinset
end FintypeInstances
end Set
theorem Equiv.set_finite_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hst : s ≃ t) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
simp_rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, hst.finite_iff]
#align equiv.set_finite_iff Equiv.set_finite_iff
/-! ### Finset -/
namespace Finset
/-- Gives a `Set.Finite` for the `Finset` coerced to a `Set`.
This is a wrapper around `Set.toFinite`. -/
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
#align finset.finite_to_set Finset.finite_toSet
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], now `simp` can prove it
theorem finite_toSet_toFinset (s : Finset α) : s.finite_toSet.toFinset = s := by
rw [toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_coe]
#align finset.finite_to_set_to_finset Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset
end Finset
namespace Multiset
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet (s : Multiset α) : { x | x ∈ s }.Finite := by
classical simpa only [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] using s.toFinset.finite_toSet
#align multiset.finite_to_set Multiset.finite_toSet
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.finite_toSet.toFinset = s.toFinset := by
ext x
simp
#align multiset.finite_to_set_to_finset Multiset.finite_toSet_toFinset
end Multiset
@[simp]
theorem List.finite_toSet (l : List α) : { x | x ∈ l }.Finite :=
(show Multiset α from ⟦l⟧).finite_toSet
#align list.finite_to_set List.finite_toSet
/-! ### Finite instances
There is seemingly some overlap between the following instances and the `Fintype` instances
in `Data.Set.Finite`. While every `Fintype` instance gives a `Finite` instance, those
instances that depend on `Fintype` or `Decidable` instances need an additional `Finite` instance
to be able to generally apply.
Some set instances do not appear here since they are consequences of others, for example
`Subtype.Finite` for subsets of a finite type.
-/
namespace Finite.Set
open scoped Classical
example {s : Set α} [Finite α] : Finite s :=
inferInstance
example : Finite (∅ : Set α) :=
inferInstance
example (a : α) : Finite ({a} : Set α) :=
inferInstance
instance finite_union (s t : Set α) [Finite s] [Finite t] : Finite (s ∪ t : Set α) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
cases nonempty_fintype t
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_union Finite.Set.finite_union
instance finite_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) [Finite s] : Finite ({ a ∈ s | p a } : Set α) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_sep Finite.Set.finite_sep
protected theorem subset (s : Set α) {t : Set α} [Finite s] (h : t ⊆ s) : Finite t := by
rw [← sep_eq_of_subset h]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.subset Finite.Set.subset
instance finite_inter_of_right (s t : Set α) [Finite t] : Finite (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset t inter_subset_right
#align finite.set.finite_inter_of_right Finite.Set.finite_inter_of_right
instance finite_inter_of_left (s t : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset s inter_subset_left
#align finite.set.finite_inter_of_left Finite.Set.finite_inter_of_left
instance finite_diff (s t : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (s \ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset s diff_subset
#align finite.set.finite_diff Finite.Set.finite_diff
instance finite_range (f : ι → α) [Finite ι] : Finite (range f) := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite (PLift ι)
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_range Finite.Set.finite_range
instance finite_iUnion [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (f i)] : Finite (⋃ i, f i) := by
rw [iUnion_eq_range_psigma]
apply Set.finite_range
#align finite.set.finite_Union Finite.Set.finite_iUnion
instance finite_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} [Finite s] [H : ∀ t : s, Finite (t : Set α)] :
Finite (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact @Finite.Set.finite_iUnion _ _ _ _ H
#align finite.set.finite_sUnion Finite.Set.finite_sUnion
theorem finite_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Finite s] (t : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ s, Finite (t i)) : Finite (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
haveI : ∀ i : s, Finite (t i) := fun i => H i i.property
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion Finite.Set.finite_biUnion
instance finite_biUnion' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Finite s] (t : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (t i)] :
Finite (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
finite_biUnion s t fun _ _ => inferInstance
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion' Finite.Set.finite_biUnion'
/-- Example: `Finite (⋃ (i < n), f i)` where `f : ℕ → Set α` and `[∀ i, Finite (f i)]`
(when given instances from `Order.Interval.Finset.Nat`).
-/
instance finite_biUnion'' {ι : Type*} (p : ι → Prop) [h : Finite { x | p x }] (t : ι → Set α)
[∀ i, Finite (t i)] : Finite (⋃ (x) (_ : p x), t x) :=
@Finite.Set.finite_biUnion' _ _ (setOf p) h t _
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion'' Finite.Set.finite_biUnion''
instance finite_iInter {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (t i)] :
Finite (⋂ i, t i) :=
Finite.Set.subset (t <| Classical.arbitrary ι) (iInter_subset _ _)
#align finite.set.finite_Inter Finite.Set.finite_iInter
instance finite_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (insert a s : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.finite_union {a} s
#align finite.set.finite_insert Finite.Set.finite_insert
instance finite_image (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Finite s] : Finite (f '' s) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_image Finite.Set.finite_image
instance finite_replacement [Finite α] (f : α → β) :
Finite {f x | x : α} :=
Finite.Set.finite_range f
#align finite.set.finite_replacement Finite.Set.finite_replacement
instance finite_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Finite s] [Finite t] :
Finite (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) :=
Finite.of_equiv _ (Equiv.Set.prod s t).symm
#align finite.set.finite_prod Finite.Set.finite_prod
instance finite_image2 (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Finite s] [Finite t] :
Finite (image2 f s t : Set γ) := by
rw [← image_prod]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_image2 Finite.Set.finite_image2
instance finite_seq (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Finite f] [Finite s] : Finite (f.seq s) := by
rw [seq_def]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_seq Finite.Set.finite_seq
end Finite.Set
namespace Set
/-! ### Constructors for `Set.Finite`
Every constructor here should have a corresponding `Fintype` instance in the previous section
(or in the `Fintype` module).
The implementation of these constructors ideally should be no more than `Set.toFinite`,
after possibly setting up some `Fintype` and classical `Decidable` instances.
-/
section SetFiniteConstructors
@[nontriviality]
theorem Finite.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (s : Set α) : s.Finite :=
s.toFinite
#align set.finite.of_subsingleton Set.Finite.of_subsingleton
theorem finite_univ [Finite α] : (@univ α).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
#align set.finite_univ Set.finite_univ
theorem finite_univ_iff : (@univ α).Finite ↔ Finite α := (Equiv.Set.univ α).finite_iff
#align set.finite_univ_iff Set.finite_univ_iff
alias ⟨_root_.Finite.of_finite_univ, _⟩ := finite_univ_iff
#align finite.of_finite_univ Finite.of_finite_univ
theorem Finite.subset {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {t : Set α} (ht : t ⊆ s) : t.Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
exact Finite.Set.subset _ ht
#align set.finite.subset Set.Finite.subset
theorem Finite.union {s t : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : (s ∪ t).Finite := by
rw [Set.Finite] at hs ht
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.union Set.Finite.union
theorem Finite.finite_of_compl {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (hsc : sᶜ.Finite) : Finite α := by
rw [← finite_univ_iff, ← union_compl_self s]
exact hs.union hsc
#align set.finite.finite_of_compl Set.Finite.finite_of_compl
theorem Finite.sup {s t : Set α} : s.Finite → t.Finite → (s ⊔ t).Finite :=
Finite.union
#align set.finite.sup Set.Finite.sup
theorem Finite.sep {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (p : α → Prop) : { a ∈ s | p a }.Finite :=
hs.subset <| sep_subset _ _
#align set.finite.sep Set.Finite.sep
theorem Finite.inter_of_left {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s ∩ t).Finite :=
hs.subset inter_subset_left
#align set.finite.inter_of_left Set.Finite.inter_of_left
theorem Finite.inter_of_right {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (t ∩ s).Finite :=
hs.subset inter_subset_right
#align set.finite.inter_of_right Set.Finite.inter_of_right
theorem Finite.inf_of_left {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s ⊓ t).Finite :=
h.inter_of_left t
#align set.finite.inf_of_left Set.Finite.inf_of_left
theorem Finite.inf_of_right {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (t ⊓ s).Finite :=
h.inter_of_right t
#align set.finite.inf_of_right Set.Finite.inf_of_right
protected lemma Infinite.mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s.Infinite → t.Infinite :=
mt fun ht ↦ ht.subset h
#align set.infinite.mono Set.Infinite.mono
theorem Finite.diff {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s \ t).Finite :=
hs.subset diff_subset
#align set.finite.diff Set.Finite.diff
theorem Finite.of_diff {s t : Set α} (hd : (s \ t).Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : s.Finite :=
(hd.union ht).subset <| subset_diff_union _ _
#align set.finite.of_diff Set.Finite.of_diff
theorem finite_iUnion [Finite ι] {f : ι → Set α} (H : ∀ i, (f i).Finite) : (⋃ i, f i).Finite :=
haveI := fun i => (H i).to_subtype
toFinite _
#align set.finite_Union Set.finite_iUnion
/-- Dependent version of `Finite.biUnion`. -/
theorem Finite.biUnion' {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) {t : ∀ i ∈ s, Set α}
(ht : ∀ i (hi : i ∈ s), (t i hi).Finite) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i ‹_›).Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply finite_iUnion fun i : s => ht i.1 i.2
#align set.finite.bUnion' Set.Finite.biUnion'
theorem Finite.biUnion {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) {t : ι → Set α}
(ht : ∀ i ∈ s, (t i).Finite) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i).Finite :=
hs.biUnion' ht
#align set.finite.bUnion Set.Finite.biUnion
theorem Finite.sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Finite) (H : ∀ t ∈ s, Set.Finite t) :
(⋃₀ s).Finite := by
simpa only [sUnion_eq_biUnion] using hs.biUnion H
#align set.finite.sUnion Set.Finite.sUnion
theorem Finite.sInter {α : Type*} {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (ht : t ∈ s) (hf : t.Finite) :
(⋂₀ s).Finite :=
hf.subset (sInter_subset_of_mem ht)
#align set.finite.sInter Set.Finite.sInter
/-- If sets `s i` are finite for all `i` from a finite set `t` and are empty for `i ∉ t`, then the
union `⋃ i, s i` is a finite set. -/
theorem Finite.iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Finite)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ t, (s i).Finite) (he : ∀ i, i ∉ t → s i = ∅) : (⋃ i, s i).Finite := by
suffices ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, s i by exact (ht.biUnion hs).subset this
refine iUnion_subset fun i x hx => ?_
by_cases hi : i ∈ t
· exact mem_biUnion hi hx
· rw [he i hi, mem_empty_iff_false] at hx
contradiction
#align set.finite.Union Set.Finite.iUnion
section monad
attribute [local instance] Set.monad
theorem Finite.bind {α β} {s : Set α} {f : α → Set β} (h : s.Finite) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, (f a).Finite) :
(s >>= f).Finite :=
h.biUnion hf
#align set.finite.bind Set.Finite.bind
end monad
@[simp]
theorem finite_empty : (∅ : Set α).Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_empty Set.finite_empty
protected theorem Infinite.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 <| by
rintro rfl
exact h finite_empty
#align set.infinite.nonempty Set.Infinite.nonempty
@[simp]
theorem finite_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_singleton Set.finite_singleton
theorem finite_pure (a : α) : (pure a : Set α).Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_pure Set.finite_pure
@[simp]
protected theorem Finite.insert (a : α) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : (insert a s).Finite :=
(finite_singleton a).union hs
#align set.finite.insert Set.Finite.insert
theorem Finite.image {s : Set α} (f : α → β) (hs : s.Finite) : (f '' s).Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.image Set.Finite.image
theorem finite_range (f : ι → α) [Finite ι] : (range f).Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_range Set.finite_range
lemma Finite.of_surjOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (f : α → β) (hf : SurjOn f s t) (hs : s.Finite) :
t.Finite := (hs.image _).subset hf
theorem Finite.dependent_image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (F : ∀ i ∈ s, β) :
{y : β | ∃ x hx, F x hx = y}.Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
simpa [range] using finite_range fun x : s => F x x.2
#align set.finite.dependent_image Set.Finite.dependent_image
theorem Finite.map {α β} {s : Set α} : ∀ f : α → β, s.Finite → (f <$> s).Finite :=
Finite.image
#align set.finite.map Set.Finite.map
theorem Finite.of_finite_image {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h : (f '' s).Finite) (hi : Set.InjOn f s) :
s.Finite :=
have := h.to_subtype
.of_injective _ hi.bijOn_image.bijective.injective
#align set.finite.of_finite_image Set.Finite.of_finite_image
section preimage
variable {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
theorem finite_of_finite_preimage (h : (f ⁻¹' s).Finite) (hs : s ⊆ range f) : s.Finite := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_of_subset hs]
exact Finite.image f h
#align set.finite_of_finite_preimage Set.finite_of_finite_preimage
theorem Finite.of_preimage (h : (f ⁻¹' s).Finite) (hf : Surjective f) : s.Finite :=
hf.image_preimage s ▸ h.image _
#align set.finite.of_preimage Set.Finite.of_preimage
theorem Finite.preimage (I : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) (h : s.Finite) : (f ⁻¹' s).Finite :=
(h.subset (image_preimage_subset f s)).of_finite_image I
#align set.finite.preimage Set.Finite.preimage
protected lemma Infinite.preimage (hs : s.Infinite) (hf : s ⊆ range f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Infinite :=
fun h ↦ hs <| finite_of_finite_preimage h hf
lemma Infinite.preimage' (hs : (s ∩ range f).Infinite) : (f ⁻¹' s).Infinite :=
(hs.preimage inter_subset_right).mono <| preimage_mono inter_subset_left
theorem Finite.preimage_embedding {s : Set β} (f : α ↪ β) (h : s.Finite) : (f ⁻¹' s).Finite :=
h.preimage fun _ _ _ _ h' => f.injective h'
#align set.finite.preimage_embedding Set.Finite.preimage_embedding
end preimage
theorem finite_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : Set.Finite { i | i < n } :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_lt_nat Set.finite_lt_nat
theorem finite_le_nat (n : ℕ) : Set.Finite { i | i ≤ n } :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_le_nat Set.finite_le_nat
section MapsTo
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → α} (hs : s.Finite) (hm : MapsTo f s s)
theorem Finite.surjOn_iff_bijOn_of_mapsTo : SurjOn f s s ↔ BijOn f s s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨hm, ?_, h⟩, BijOn.surjOn⟩
have : Finite s := finite_coe_iff.mpr hs
exact hm.restrict_inj.mp (Finite.injective_iff_surjective.mpr <| hm.restrict_surjective_iff.mpr h)
theorem Finite.injOn_iff_bijOn_of_mapsTo : InjOn f s ↔ BijOn f s s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨hm, h, ?_⟩, BijOn.injOn⟩
have : Finite s := finite_coe_iff.mpr hs
exact hm.restrict_surjective_iff.mp (Finite.injective_iff_surjective.mp <| hm.restrict_inj.mpr h)
end MapsTo
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
protected theorem Finite.prod (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
have := ht.to_subtype
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.prod Set.Finite.prod
theorem Finite.of_prod_left (h : (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).Finite) : t.Nonempty → s.Finite :=
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => (h.image Prod.fst).subset fun a ha => ⟨(a, b), ⟨ha, hb⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.finite.of_prod_left Set.Finite.of_prod_left
theorem Finite.of_prod_right (h : (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).Finite) : s.Nonempty → t.Finite :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (h.image Prod.snd).subset fun b hb => ⟨(a, b), ⟨ha, hb⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.finite.of_prod_right Set.Finite.of_prod_right
protected theorem Infinite.prod_left (hs : s.Infinite) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).Infinite :=
fun h => hs <| h.of_prod_left ht
#align set.infinite.prod_left Set.Infinite.prod_left
protected theorem Infinite.prod_right (ht : t.Infinite) (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).Infinite :=
fun h => ht <| h.of_prod_right hs
#align set.infinite.prod_right Set.Infinite.prod_right
protected theorem infinite_prod :
(s ×ˢ t).Infinite ↔ s.Infinite ∧ t.Nonempty ∨ t.Infinite ∧ s.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [Set.Infinite, @and_comm ¬_, ← Classical.not_imp]
by_contra!
exact h ((this.1 h.nonempty.snd).prod <| this.2 h.nonempty.fst)
· rintro (h | h)
· exact h.1.prod_left h.2
· exact h.1.prod_right h.2
#align set.infinite_prod Set.infinite_prod
theorem finite_prod : (s ×ˢ t).Finite ↔ (s.Finite ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (t.Finite ∨ s = ∅) := by
simp only [← not_infinite, Set.infinite_prod, not_or, not_and_or, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
#align set.finite_prod Set.finite_prod
protected theorem Finite.offDiag {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : s.offDiag.Finite :=
(hs.prod hs).subset s.offDiag_subset_prod
#align set.finite.off_diag Set.Finite.offDiag
protected theorem Finite.image2 (f : α → β → γ) (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
(image2 f s t).Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
have := ht.to_subtype
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.image2 Set.Finite.image2
end Prod
theorem Finite.seq {f : Set (α → β)} {s : Set α} (hf : f.Finite) (hs : s.Finite) :
(f.seq s).Finite :=
hf.image2 _ hs
#align set.finite.seq Set.Finite.seq
theorem Finite.seq' {α β : Type u} {f : Set (α → β)} {s : Set α} (hf : f.Finite) (hs : s.Finite) :
(f <*> s).Finite :=
hf.seq hs
#align set.finite.seq' Set.Finite.seq'
theorem finite_mem_finset (s : Finset α) : { a | a ∈ s }.Finite :=
toFinite _
#align set.finite_mem_finset Set.finite_mem_finset
theorem Subsingleton.finite {s : Set α} (h : s.Subsingleton) : s.Finite :=
h.induction_on finite_empty finite_singleton
#align set.subsingleton.finite Set.Subsingleton.finite
theorem Infinite.nontrivial {s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) : s.Nontrivial :=
not_subsingleton_iff.1 <| mt Subsingleton.finite hs
theorem finite_preimage_inl_and_inr {s : Set (Sum α β)} :
(Sum.inl ⁻¹' s).Finite ∧ (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s).Finite ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h => image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr s ▸ (h.1.image _).union (h.2.image _),
fun h => ⟨h.preimage Sum.inl_injective.injOn, h.preimage Sum.inr_injective.injOn⟩⟩
#align set.finite_preimage_inl_and_inr Set.finite_preimage_inl_and_inr
theorem exists_finite_iff_finset {p : Set α → Prop} :
(∃ s : Set α, s.Finite ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s : Finset α, p ↑s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hs, hps⟩ => ⟨hs.toFinset, hs.coe_toFinset.symm ▸ hps⟩, fun ⟨s, hs⟩ =>
⟨s, s.finite_toSet, hs⟩⟩
#align set.exists_finite_iff_finset Set.exists_finite_iff_finset
/-- There are finitely many subsets of a given finite set -/
theorem Finite.finite_subsets {α : Type u} {a : Set α} (h : a.Finite) : { b | b ⊆ a }.Finite := by
convert ((Finset.powerset h.toFinset).map Finset.coeEmb.1).finite_toSet
ext s
simpa [← @exists_finite_iff_finset α fun t => t ⊆ a ∧ t = s, Finite.subset_toFinset,
← and_assoc, Finset.coeEmb] using h.subset
#align set.finite.finite_subsets Set.Finite.finite_subsets
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {κ : ι → Type*} {t : ∀ i, Set (κ i)}
/-- Finite product of finite sets is finite -/
theorem Finite.pi (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Finite) : (pi univ t).Finite := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
lift t to ∀ d, Finset (κ d) using ht
classical
rw [← Fintype.coe_piFinset]
apply Finset.finite_toSet
#align set.finite.pi Set.Finite.pi
/-- Finite product of finite sets is finite. Note this is a variant of `Set.Finite.pi` without the
extra `i ∈ univ` binder. -/
lemma Finite.pi' (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Finite) : {f : ∀ i, κ i | ∀ i, f i ∈ t i}.Finite := by
simpa [Set.pi] using Finite.pi ht
end Pi
/-- A finite union of finsets is finite. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Finite.lean | 1,058 | 1,061 | theorem union_finset_finite_of_range_finite (f : α → Finset β) (h : (range f).Finite) :
(⋃ a, (f a : Set β)).Finite := by |
rw [← biUnion_range]
exact h.biUnion fun y _ => y.finite_toSet
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformMulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Star
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Int
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Bornology
#align_import topology.instances.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9a59dcb7a2d06bf55da57b9030169219980660cd"
/-!
# Topological properties of ℝ
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Filter Int Metric Set TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped Topology Uniformity Interval
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
instance : NoncompactSpace ℝ := Int.closedEmbedding_coe_real.noncompactSpace
theorem Real.uniformContinuous_add : UniformContinuous fun p : ℝ × ℝ => p.1 + p.2 :=
Metric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abs ε0
⟨δ, δ0, fun h =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := max_lt_iff.1 h
Hδ h₁ h₂⟩
#align real.uniform_continuous_add Real.uniformContinuous_add
theorem Real.uniformContinuous_neg : UniformContinuous (@Neg.neg ℝ _) :=
Metric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε ε0 =>
⟨_, ε0, fun h => by rw [dist_comm] at h; simpa only [Real.dist_eq, neg_sub_neg] using h⟩
#align real.uniform_continuous_neg Real.uniformContinuous_neg
instance : ContinuousStar ℝ := ⟨continuous_id⟩
instance : UniformAddGroup ℝ :=
UniformAddGroup.mk' Real.uniformContinuous_add Real.uniformContinuous_neg
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : TopologicalAddGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : TopologicalRing ℝ := inferInstance
instance : TopologicalDivisionRing ℝ := inferInstance
instance : ProperSpace ℝ where
isCompact_closedBall x r := by
rw [Real.closedBall_eq_Icc]
apply isCompact_Icc
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ := secondCountable_of_proper
theorem Real.isTopologicalBasis_Ioo_rat :
@IsTopologicalBasis ℝ _ (⋃ (a : ℚ) (b : ℚ) (_ : a < b), {Ioo (a : ℝ) b}) :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [isOpen_Ioo])
fun a v hav hv =>
let ⟨l, u, ⟨hl, hu⟩, h⟩ := mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.mp (IsOpen.mem_nhds hv hav)
let ⟨q, hlq, hqa⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hl
let ⟨p, hap, hpu⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hu
⟨Ioo q p, by
simp only [mem_iUnion]
exact ⟨q, p, Rat.cast_lt.1 <| hqa.trans hap, rfl⟩, ⟨hqa, hap⟩, fun a' ⟨hqa', ha'p⟩ =>
h ⟨hlq.trans hqa', ha'p.trans hpu⟩⟩
#align real.is_topological_basis_Ioo_rat Real.isTopologicalBasis_Ioo_rat
@[simp]
theorem Real.cobounded_eq : cobounded ℝ = atBot ⊔ atTop := by
simp only [← comap_dist_right_atTop (0 : ℝ), Real.dist_eq, sub_zero, comap_abs_atTop]
@[deprecated] alias Real.cocompact_eq := cocompact_eq_atBot_atTop
#align real.cocompact_eq Real.cocompact_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-07")] alias Real.atBot_le_cocompact := atBot_le_cocompact
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-07")] alias Real.atTop_le_cocompact := atTop_le_cocompact
/- TODO(Mario): Prove that these are uniform isomorphisms instead of uniform embeddings
lemma uniform_embedding_add_rat {r : ℚ} : uniform_embedding (fun p : ℚ => p + r) :=
_
lemma uniform_embedding_mul_rat {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : uniform_embedding ((*) q) :=
_ -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/Real.lean | 92 | 94 | theorem Real.mem_closure_iff {s : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ y ∈ s, |y - x| < ε := by |
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball, Real.dist_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.GramSchmidtOrtho
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Orientation
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.orientation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bd65478311e4dfd41f48bf38c7e3b02fb75d0163"
/-!
# Orientations of real inner product spaces.
This file provides definitions and proves lemmas about orientations of real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `OrthonormalBasis.adjustToOrientation` takes an orthonormal basis and an orientation, and
returns an orthonormal basis with that orientation: either the original orthonormal basis, or one
constructed by negating a single (arbitrary) basis vector.
* `Orientation.finOrthonormalBasis` is an orthonormal basis, indexed by `Fin n`, with the given
orientation.
* `Orientation.volumeForm` is a nonvanishing top-dimensional alternating form on an oriented real
inner product space, uniquely defined by compatibility with the orientation and inner product
structure.
## Main theorems
* `Orientation.volumeForm_apply_le` states that the result of applying the volume form to a set of
`n` vectors, where `n` is the dimension the inner product space, is bounded by the product of the
lengths of the vectors.
* `Orientation.abs_volumeForm_apply_of_pairwise_orthogonal` states that the result of applying the
volume form to a set of `n` orthogonal vectors, where `n` is the dimension the inner product
space, is equal up to sign to the product of the lengths of the vectors.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
open FiniteDimensional
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace OrthonormalBasis
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] [ne : Nonempty ι] (e f : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ E)
(x : Orientation ℝ E ι)
/-- The change-of-basis matrix between two orthonormal bases with the same orientation has
determinant 1. -/
theorem det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_same_orientation
(h : e.toBasis.orientation = f.toBasis.orientation) : e.toBasis.det f = 1 := by
apply (e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_real f).resolve_right
have : 0 < e.toBasis.det f := by
rw [e.toBasis.orientation_eq_iff_det_pos] at h
simpa using h
linarith
#align orthonormal_basis.det_to_matrix_orthonormal_basis_of_same_orientation OrthonormalBasis.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_same_orientation
/-- The change-of-basis matrix between two orthonormal bases with the opposite orientations has
determinant -1. -/
theorem det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_opposite_orientation
(h : e.toBasis.orientation ≠ f.toBasis.orientation) : e.toBasis.det f = -1 := by
contrapose! h
simp [e.toBasis.orientation_eq_iff_det_pos,
(e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_real f).resolve_right h]
#align orthonormal_basis.det_to_matrix_orthonormal_basis_of_opposite_orientation OrthonormalBasis.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_opposite_orientation
variable {e f}
/-- Two orthonormal bases with the same orientation determine the same "determinant" top-dimensional
form on `E`, and conversely. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Orientation.lean | 76 | 84 | theorem same_orientation_iff_det_eq_det :
e.toBasis.det = f.toBasis.det ↔ e.toBasis.orientation = f.toBasis.orientation := by |
constructor
· intro h
dsimp [Basis.orientation]
congr
· intro h
rw [e.toBasis.det.eq_smul_basis_det f.toBasis]
simp [e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_same_orientation f h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf_of_types from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# The sheaf condition for a presieve
We define what it means for a presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v` to be a sheaf *for* a particular
presieve `R` on `X`:
* A *family of elements* `x` for `P` at `R` is an element `x_f` of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`. See `FamilyOfElements`.
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and `f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` both in `R`,
and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂` such that `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`, the restriction of
`x_f₁` along `g₁` agrees with the restriction of `x_f₂` along `g₂`.
See `FamilyOfElements.Compatible`.
* An *amalgamation* `t` for the family is an element of `P X` such that for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`, the restriction of `t` on `f` is `x_f`.
See `FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation`.
We then say `P` is *separated* for `R` if every compatible family has at most one amalgamation,
and it is a *sheaf* for `R` if every compatible family has a unique amalgamation.
See `IsSeparatedFor` and `IsSheafFor`.
In the special case where `R` is a sieve, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R` and `g : Z ⟶ Y`, the restriction of
`x_f` along `g` agrees with `x_(g ≫ f)` (which is well defined since `g ≫ f` is in `R`).
See `FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible` and `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
In the special case where `C` has pullbacks, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` both in `R`,
the restriction of `x_f` along `π₁ : pullback f g ⟶ Y` agrees with the restriction of `x_g`
along `π₂ : pullback f g ⟶ Z`.
See `FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible` and `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
We also provide equivalent conditions to satisfy alternate definitions given in the literature.
* Stacks: The condition of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z8 is virtually identical to the
statement of `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition` (since the bijection described there carries
the same information as the unique existence.)
* Maclane-Moerdijk [MM92]: Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`, the definitions of `IsSheaf`
are equivalent. There are also alternate definitions given:
- Yoneda condition: Defined in `yonedaSheafCondition` and equivalence in
`isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
- Matching family for presieves with pullback: `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
## Implementation
The sheaf condition is given as a proposition, rather than a subsingleton in `Type (max u₁ v)`.
This doesn't seem to make a big difference, other than making a couple of definitions noncomputable,
but it means that equivalent conditions can be given as `↔` statements rather than `≃` statements,
which can be convenient.
## References
* [MM92]: *Sheaves in geometry and logic*, Saunders MacLane, and Ieke Moerdijk:
Chapter III, Section 4.
* [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, P. T. Johnstone: C2.1.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL (sheaves on a pretopology or site)
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00ZB (sheaves on a topology)
-/
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presieve
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {P Q U : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w}
variable {X Y : C} {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf `P` given a collection of arrows `R` with fixed codomain `X`
consists of an element of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R`.
A presheaf is a sheaf (resp, separated) if every *compatible* family of elements has exactly one
(resp, at most one) amalgamation.
This data is referred to as a `family` in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. It is also a concrete
version of the elements of the middle object in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM which is
more useful for direct calculations. It is also used implicitly in Definition C2.1.2 in [Elephant].
-/
def FamilyOfElements (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f → P.obj (op Y)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements
instance : Inhabited (FamilyOfElements P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
⟨fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf on the presieve `R₂` can be restricted to a smaller presieve
`R₁`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) :
FamilyOfElements P R₂ → FamilyOfElements P R₁ := fun x _ f hf => x f (h _ hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.restrict
/-- The image of a family of elements by a morphism of presheaves. -/
def FamilyOfElements.map (p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) :
FamilyOfElements Q R :=
fun _ f hf => φ.app _ (p f hf)
@[simp]
lemma FamilyOfElements.map_apply
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : R f) :
p.map φ f hf = φ.app _ (p f hf) := rfl
lemma FamilyOfElements.restrict_map
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {R' : Presieve X} (h : R' ≤ R) :
(p.restrict h).map φ = (p.map φ).restrict h := rfl
/-- A family of elements for the arrow set `R` is *compatible* if for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and
`f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` in `R`, and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂`, if the square `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`
commutes then the elements of `P Z` obtained by restricting the element of `P Y₁` along `g₁` and
restricting the element of `P Y₂` along `g₂` are the same.
In special cases, this condition can be simplified, see `pullbackCompatible_iff` and
`compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is referred to as a "compatible family" in Definition C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and on nlab:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.Compatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.Compatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂ Z⦄ (g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁) (g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂) ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂ → P.map g₁.op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map g₂.op (x f₂ h₂)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible
/--
If the category `C` has pullbacks, this is an alternative condition for a family of elements to be
compatible: For any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` in the presieve `R`, the restriction of the
given elements for `f` and `g` to the pullback agree.
This is equivalent to being compatible (provided `C` has pullbacks), shown in
`pullbackCompatible_iff`.
This is the definition for a "matching" family given in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
Equation (5). Viewing the type `FamilyOfElements` as the middle object of the fork in
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM, this condition expresses that `pr₀* (x) = pr₁* (x)`,
using the notation defined there.
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.PullbackCompatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂⦄ ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks h₁ h₂
P.map (pullback.fst : Limits.pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ _).op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map pullback.snd.op (x f₂ h₂)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.pullback_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible
theorem pullbackCompatible_iff (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] :
x.Compatible ↔ x.PullbackCompatible := by
constructor
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂
apply t
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
apply pullback.condition
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
rw [← pullback.lift_fst _ _ comm, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, t hf₁ hf₂,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
#align category_theory.presieve.pullback_compatible_iff CategoryTheory.Presieve.pullbackCompatible_iff
/-- The restriction of a compatible family is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂)
{x : FamilyOfElements P R₂} : x.Compatible → (x.restrict h).Compatible :=
fun q _ _ _ g₁ g₂ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm => q g₁ g₂ (h _ h₁) (h _ h₂) comm
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict
/-- Extend a family of elements to the sieve generated by an arrow set.
This is the construction described as "easy" in Lemma C2.1.3 of [Elephant].
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) := fun _ _ hf =>
P.map hf.choose_spec.choose.op (x _ hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.1)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
/-- The extension of a compatible family to the generated sieve is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.Compatible := by
intro _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm
iterate 2 erw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]; rw [← op_comp]
apply hx
simp [comm, h₁.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2, h₂.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend
/-- The extension of a family agrees with the original family. -/
theorem extend_agrees {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : R f) :
x.sieveExtend f (le_generate R Y hf) = x f hf := by
have h := (le_generate R Y hf).choose_spec
unfold FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
rw [t h.choose (𝟙 _) _ hf _]
· simp
· rw [id_comp]
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
#align category_theory.presieve.extend_agrees CategoryTheory.Presieve.extend_agrees
/-- The restriction of an extension is the original. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.restrict (le_generate R) = x := by
funext Y f hf
exact extend_agrees t hf
#align category_theory.presieve.restrict_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.restrict_extend
/--
If the arrow set for a family of elements is actually a sieve (i.e. it is downward closed) then the
consistency condition can be simplified.
This is an equivalent condition, see `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is the notion of "matching" given for families on sieves given in [MM92], Chapter III,
Section 4, Equation 1, and nlab: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/matching+family.
See also the discussion before Lemma C2.1.4 of [Elephant].
-/
def FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y Z⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (hf), x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible
theorem compatible_iff_sieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
x.Compatible ↔ x.SieveCompatible := by
constructor
· intro h Y Z f g hf
simpa using h (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
· intro h Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ k
simp_rw [← h f₁ g₁ h₁, ← h f₂ g₂ h₂]
congr
#align category_theory.presieve.compatible_iff_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.compatible_iff_sieveCompatible
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.to_sieveCompatible {x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)}
(t : x.Compatible) : x.SieveCompatible :=
(compatible_iff_sieveCompatible x).1 t
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.to_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.to_sieveCompatible
/--
Given a family of elements `x` for the sieve `S` generated by a presieve `R`, if `x` is restricted
to `R` and then extended back up to `S`, the resulting extension equals `x`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem extend_restrict {x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R)} (t : x.Compatible) :
(x.restrict (le_generate R)).sieveExtend = x := by
rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at t
funext _ _ h
apply (t _ _ _).symm.trans
congr
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
#align category_theory.presieve.extend_restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.extend_restrict
/--
Two compatible families on the sieve generated by a presieve `R` are equal if and only if they are
equal when restricted to `R`.
-/
theorem restrict_inj {x₁ x₂ : FamilyOfElements P (generate R)} (t₁ : x₁.Compatible)
(t₂ : x₂.Compatible) : x₁.restrict (le_generate R) = x₂.restrict (le_generate R) → x₁ = x₂ :=
fun h => by
rw [← extend_restrict t₁, ← extend_restrict t₂]
-- Porting note: congr fails to make progress
apply congr_arg
exact h
#align category_theory.presieve.restrict_inj CategoryTheory.Presieve.restrict_inj
/-- Compatible families of elements for a presheaf of types `P` and a presieve `R`
are in 1-1 correspondence with compatible families for the same presheaf and
the sieve generated by `R`, through extension and restriction. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def compatibleEquivGenerateSieveCompatible :
{ x : FamilyOfElements P R // x.Compatible } ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.sieveExtend, x.2.sieveExtend⟩
invFun x := ⟨x.1.restrict (le_generate R), x.2.restrict _⟩
left_inv x := Subtype.ext (restrict_extend x.2)
right_inv x := Subtype.ext (extend_restrict x.2)
#align category_theory.presieve.compatible_equiv_generate_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.compatibleEquivGenerateSieveCompatible
theorem FamilyOfElements.comp_of_compatible (S : Sieve X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S}
(t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : S f) {Z} (g : Z ⟶ Y) :
x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf) := by
simpa using t (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_of_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.comp_of_compatible
section FunctorPullback
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C) {Z : D}
variable {T : Presieve (F.obj Z)} {x : FamilyOfElements P T}
/--
Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `F(X)`, we can realize it as a family of elements of
`S.functorPullback F`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.functorPullback (x : FamilyOfElements P T) :
FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) (T.functorPullback F) := fun _ f hf => x (F.map f) hf
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.functor_pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.functorPullback
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.functorPullback (h : x.Compatible) :
(x.functorPullback F).Compatible := by
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
exact h (F.map g₁) (F.map g₂) h₁ h₂ (by simp only [← F.map_comp, eq])
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.functor_pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.functorPullback
end FunctorPullback
/-- Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `X` whose values factors through `F`, we can
realize it as a family of elements of `S.functorPushforward F`. Since the preimage is obtained by
choice, this is not well-defined generally.
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.functorPushforward {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C)
{X : D} {T : Presieve X} (x : FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) T) :
FamilyOfElements P (T.functorPushforward F) := fun Y f h => by
obtain ⟨Z, g, h, h₁, _⟩ := getFunctorPushforwardStructure h
exact P.map h.op (x g h₁)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.functor_pushforward CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.functorPushforward
section Pullback
/-- Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `X`, and a map `Y ⟶ X`, we can obtain a
family of elements of `S.pullback f` by taking the same elements.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.pullback (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
FamilyOfElements P (S.pullback f : Presieve Y) := fun _ g hg => x (g ≫ f) hg
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.pullback
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.pullback (f : Y ⟶ X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S}
(h : x.Compatible) : (x.pullback f).Compatible := by
simp only [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at h ⊢
intro W Z f₁ f₂ hf
unfold FamilyOfElements.pullback
rw [← h (f₁ ≫ f) f₂ hf]
congr 1
simp only [assoc]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.pullback
end Pullback
/-- Given a morphism of presheaves `f : P ⟶ Q`, we can take a family of elements valued in `P` to a
family of elements valued in `Q` by composing with `f`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap (f : P ⟶ Q) (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements Q R := fun Y g hg => f.app (op Y) (x g hg)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_presheaf_map CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap
@[simp]
theorem FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_id (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
x.compPresheafMap (𝟙 P) = x :=
rfl
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_presheaf_map_id CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_id
@[simp]
theorem FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_comp (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (f : P ⟶ Q)
(g : Q ⟶ U) : (x.compPresheafMap f).compPresheafMap g = x.compPresheafMap (f ≫ g) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_prersheaf_map_comp CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_comp
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.compPresheafMap (f : P ⟶ Q) {x : FamilyOfElements P R}
(h : x.Compatible) : (x.compPresheafMap f).Compatible := by
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
unfold FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap
rwa [← FunctorToTypes.naturality, ← FunctorToTypes.naturality, h]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.comp_presheaf_map CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.compPresheafMap
/--
The given element `t` of `P.obj (op X)` is an *amalgamation* for the family of elements `x` if every
restriction `P.map f.op t = x_f` for every arrow `f` in the presieve `R`.
This is the definition given in https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents,
and https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/matching+family, as well as [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
equation (2).
-/
def FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t : P.obj (op X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (h : R f), P.map f.op t = x f h
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.is_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation
theorem FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation.compPresheafMap {x : FamilyOfElements P R} {t} (f : P ⟶ Q)
(h : x.IsAmalgamation t) : (x.compPresheafMap f).IsAmalgamation (f.app (op X) t) := by
intro Y g hg
dsimp [FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap]
change (f.app _ ≫ Q.map _) _ = _
rw [← f.naturality, types_comp_apply, h g hg]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.is_amalgamation.comp_presheaf_map CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation.compPresheafMap
theorem is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation (x : FamilyOfElements P R)
(h : ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) : x.Compatible := by
cases' h with t ht
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ comm
rw [← ht _ h₁, ← ht _ h₂, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, comm]
simp
#align category_theory.presieve.is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presieve.is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation
theorem isAmalgamation_restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) (x : FamilyOfElements P R₂)
(t : P.obj (op X)) (ht : x.IsAmalgamation t) : (x.restrict h).IsAmalgamation t := fun Y f hf =>
ht f (h Y hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.is_amalgamation_restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.isAmalgamation_restrict
theorem isAmalgamation_sieveExtend {R : Presieve X} (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t : P.obj (op X))
(ht : x.IsAmalgamation t) : x.sieveExtend.IsAmalgamation t := by
intro Y f hf
dsimp [FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend]
rw [← ht _, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
#align category_theory.presieve.is_amalgamation_sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.isAmalgamation_sieveExtend
/-- A presheaf is separated for a presieve if there is at most one amalgamation. -/
def IsSeparatedFor (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t₁ t₂), x.IsAmalgamation t₁ → x.IsAmalgamation t₂ → t₁ = t₂
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSeparatedFor
theorem IsSeparatedFor.ext {R : Presieve X} (hR : IsSeparatedFor P R) {t₁ t₂ : P.obj (op X)}
(h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (_ : R f), P.map f.op t₁ = P.map f.op t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
hR (fun _ f _ => P.map f.op t₂) t₁ t₂ (fun _ _ hf => h hf) fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for.ext CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSeparatedFor.ext
theorem isSeparatedFor_iff_generate :
IsSeparatedFor P R ↔ IsSeparatedFor P (generate R : Presieve X) := by
constructor
· intro h x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply h (x.restrict (le_generate R)) t₁ t₂ _ _
· exact isAmalgamation_restrict _ x t₁ ht₁
· exact isAmalgamation_restrict _ x t₂ ht₂
· intro h x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply h x.sieveExtend
· exact isAmalgamation_sieveExtend x t₁ ht₁
· exact isAmalgamation_sieveExtend x t₂ ht₂
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for_iff_generate CategoryTheory.Presieve.isSeparatedFor_iff_generate
theorem isSeparatedFor_top (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSeparatedFor P (⊤ : Presieve X) :=
fun x t₁ t₂ h₁ h₂ => by
have q₁ := h₁ (𝟙 X) (by tauto)
have q₂ := h₂ (𝟙 X) (by tauto)
simp only [op_id, FunctorToTypes.map_id_apply] at q₁ q₂
rw [q₁, q₂]
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for_top CategoryTheory.Presieve.isSeparatedFor_top
/-- We define `P` to be a sheaf for the presieve `R` if every compatible family has a unique
amalgamation.
This is the definition of a sheaf for the given presieve given in C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents.
Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`,
this is equivalent to the definition of a sheaf in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4.
-/
def IsSheafFor (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃! t, x.IsAmalgamation t
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor
/-- This is an equivalent condition to be a sheaf, which is useful for the abstraction to local
operators on elementary toposes. However this definition is defined only for sieves, not presieves.
The equivalence between this and `IsSheafFor` is given in `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
This version is also useful to establish that being a sheaf is preserved under isomorphism of
presheaves.
See the discussion before Equation (3) of [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. See also C2.1.4 of
[Elephant]. This is also a direct reformulation of <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z8>.
-/
def YonedaSheafCondition (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) (S : Sieve X) : Prop :=
∀ f : S.functor ⟶ P, ∃! g, S.functorInclusion ≫ g = f
#align category_theory.presieve.yoneda_sheaf_condition CategoryTheory.Presieve.YonedaSheafCondition
-- TODO: We can generalize the universe parameter v₁ above by composing with
-- appropriate `ulift_functor`s.
/-- (Implementation). This is a (primarily internal) equivalence between natural transformations
and compatible families.
Cf the discussion after Lemma 7.47.10 in <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00YW>. See also
the proof of C2.1.4 of [Elephant], and the discussion in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4.
-/
def natTransEquivCompatibleFamily {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} :
(S.functor ⟶ P) ≃ { x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun α := by
refine ⟨fun Y f hf => ?_, ?_⟩
· apply α.app (op Y) ⟨_, hf⟩
· rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
intro Y Z f g hf
dsimp
rw [← FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ α g.op]
rfl
invFun t :=
{ app := fun Y f => t.1 _ f.2
naturality := fun Y Z g => by
ext ⟨f, hf⟩
apply t.2.to_sieveCompatible _ }
left_inv α := by
ext X ⟨_, _⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rfl
#align category_theory.presieve.nat_trans_equiv_compatible_family CategoryTheory.Presieve.natTransEquivCompatibleFamily
/-- (Implementation). A lemma useful to prove `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`. -/
theorem extension_iff_amalgamation {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (x : S.functor ⟶ P) (g : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) :
S.functorInclusion ≫ g = x ↔
(natTransEquivCompatibleFamily x).1.IsAmalgamation (yonedaEquiv g) := by
change _ ↔ ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (h : S f), P.map f.op (yonedaEquiv g) = x.app (op Y) ⟨f, h⟩
constructor
· rintro rfl Y f hf
rw [yonedaEquiv_naturality]
dsimp
simp [yonedaEquiv_apply]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
· intro h
ext Y ⟨f, hf⟩
convert h f hf
rw [yonedaEquiv_naturality]
dsimp [yonedaEquiv]
simp
#align category_theory.presieve.extension_iff_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presieve.extension_iff_amalgamation
/-- The yoneda version of the sheaf condition is equivalent to the sheaf condition.
C2.1.4 of [Elephant].
-/
theorem isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} :
IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X) ↔ YonedaSheafCondition P S := by
rw [IsSheafFor, YonedaSheafCondition]
simp_rw [extension_iff_amalgamation]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr_left' natTransEquivCompatibleFamily]
rw [Subtype.forall]
apply forall₂_congr
intro x hx
rw [Equiv.exists_unique_congr_left _]
simp
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for_iff_yoneda_sheaf_condition CategoryTheory.Presieve.isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition
/--
If `P` is a sheaf for the sieve `S` on `X`, a natural transformation from `S` (viewed as a functor)
to `P` can be (uniquely) extended to all of `yoneda.obj X`.
f
S → P
↓ ↗
yX
-/
noncomputable def IsSheafFor.extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X))
(f : S.functor ⟶ P) : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).exists.choose
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for.extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor.extend
/--
Show that the extension of `f : S.functor ⟶ P` to all of `yoneda.obj X` is in fact an extension, ie
that the triangle below commutes, provided `P` is a sheaf for `S`
f
S → P
↓ ↗
yX
-/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem IsSheafFor.functorInclusion_comp_extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P S)
(f : S.functor ⟶ P) : S.functorInclusion ≫ h.extend f = f :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).exists.choose_spec
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for.functor_inclusion_comp_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor.functorInclusion_comp_extend
/-- The extension of `f` to `yoneda.obj X` is unique. -/
theorem IsSheafFor.unique_extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P S) {f : S.functor ⟶ P}
(t : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) (ht : S.functorInclusion ≫ t = f) : t = h.extend f :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).unique ht (h.functorInclusion_comp_extend f)
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for.unique_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor.unique_extend
/--
If `P` is a sheaf for the sieve `S` on `X`, then if two natural transformations from `yoneda.obj X`
to `P` agree when restricted to the subfunctor given by `S`, they are equal.
-/
theorem IsSheafFor.hom_ext {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X))
(t₁ t₂ : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) (ht : S.functorInclusion ≫ t₁ = S.functorInclusion ≫ t₂) :
t₁ = t₂ :=
(h.unique_extend t₁ ht).trans (h.unique_extend t₂ rfl).symm
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor.hom_ext
/-- `P` is a sheaf for `R` iff it is separated for `R` and there exists an amalgamation. -/
theorem isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor :
(IsSeparatedFor P R ∧ ∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) ↔
IsSheafFor P R := by
rw [IsSeparatedFor, ← forall_and]
apply forall_congr'
intro x
constructor
· intro z hx
exact exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique (z.2 hx) z.1
· intro h
refine ⟨?_, ExistsUnique.exists ∘ h⟩
intro t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply (h _).unique ht₁ ht₂
exact is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation x ⟨_, ht₂⟩
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for_and_exists_is_amalgamation_iff_sheaf_for CategoryTheory.Presieve.isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor
/-- If `P` is separated for `R` and every family has an amalgamation, then `P` is a sheaf for `R`.
-/
theorem IsSeparatedFor.isSheafFor (t : IsSeparatedFor P R) :
(∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) → IsSheafFor P R := by
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
exact And.intro t
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for.is_sheaf_for CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSeparatedFor.isSheafFor
/-- If `P` is a sheaf for `R`, it is separated for `R`. -/
theorem IsSheafFor.isSeparatedFor : IsSheafFor P R → IsSeparatedFor P R := fun q =>
(isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor.2 q).1
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for.is_separated_for CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor.isSeparatedFor
/-- Get the amalgamation of the given compatible family, provided we have a sheaf. -/
noncomputable def IsSheafFor.amalgamate (t : IsSheafFor P R) (x : FamilyOfElements P R)
(hx : x.Compatible) : P.obj (op X) :=
(t x hx).exists.choose
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for.amalgamate CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor.amalgamate
theorem IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation (t : IsSheafFor P R) {x : FamilyOfElements P R}
(hx : x.Compatible) : x.IsAmalgamation (t.amalgamate x hx) :=
(t x hx).exists.choose_spec
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for.is_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation
@[simp]
theorem IsSheafFor.valid_glue (t : IsSheafFor P R) {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible)
(f : Y ⟶ X) (Hf : R f) : P.map f.op (t.amalgamate x hx) = x f Hf :=
t.isAmalgamation hx f Hf
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for.valid_glue CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue
/-- C2.1.3 in [Elephant] -/
theorem isSheafFor_iff_generate (R : Presieve X) :
IsSheafFor P R ↔ IsSheafFor P (generate R : Presieve X) := by
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
rw [← isSeparatedFor_iff_generate]
apply and_congr (Iff.refl _)
constructor
· intro q x hx
apply Exists.imp _ (q _ (hx.restrict (le_generate R)))
intro t ht
simpa [hx] using isAmalgamation_sieveExtend _ _ ht
· intro q x hx
apply Exists.imp _ (q _ hx.sieveExtend)
intro t ht
simpa [hx] using isAmalgamation_restrict (le_generate R) _ _ ht
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for_iff_generate CategoryTheory.Presieve.isSheafFor_iff_generate
/-- Every presheaf is a sheaf for the family {𝟙 X}.
[Elephant] C2.1.5(i)
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean | 644 | 650 | theorem isSheafFor_singleton_iso (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSheafFor P (Presieve.singleton (𝟙 X)) := by |
intro x _
refine ⟨x _ (Presieve.singleton_self _), ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
simp
· intro t ht
simpa using ht _ (Presieve.singleton_self _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sublists
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
#align_import group_theory.free_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f93c11933efbc3c2f0299e47b8ff83e9b539cbf6"
/-!
# Free groups
This file defines free groups over a type. Furthermore, it is shown that the free group construction
is an instance of a monad. For the result that `FreeGroup` is the left adjoint to the forgetful
functor from groups to types, see `Algebra/Category/Group/Adjunctions`.
## Main definitions
* `FreeGroup`/`FreeAddGroup`: the free group (resp. free additive group) associated to a type
`α` defined as the words over `a : α × Bool` modulo the relation `a * x * x⁻¹ * b = a * b`.
* `FreeGroup.mk`/`FreeAddGroup.mk`: the canonical quotient map `List (α × Bool) → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.of`/`FreeAddGroup.of`: the canonical injection `α → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.lift f`/`FreeAddGroup.lift`: the canonical group homomorphism `FreeGroup α →* G`
given a group `G` and a function `f : α → G`.
## Main statements
* `FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser`/`FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser`: The Church-Rosser theorem for word
reduction (also known as Newman's diamond lemma).
* `FreeGroup.freeGroupUnitEquivInt`: The free group over the one-point type
is isomorphic to the integers.
* The free group construction is an instance of a monad.
## Implementation details
First we introduce the one step reduction relation `FreeGroup.Red.Step`:
`w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v`, its reflexive transitive closure `FreeGroup.Red.trans`
and prove that its join is an equivalence relation. Then we introduce `FreeGroup α` as a quotient
over `FreeGroup.Red.Step`.
For the additive version we introduce the same relation under a different name so that we can
distinguish the quotient types more easily.
## Tags
free group, Newman's diamond lemma, Church-Rosser theorem
-/
open Relation
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u}
attribute [local simp] List.append_eq_has_append
-- Porting note: to_additive.map_namespace is not supported yet
-- worked around it by putting a few extra manual mappings (but not too many all in all)
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `FreeGroup `FreeAddGroup
/-- Reduction step for the additive free group relation: `w + x + (-x) + v ~> w + v` -/
inductive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeAddGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
#align free_add_group.red.step FreeAddGroup.Red.Step
attribute [simp] FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not
/-- Reduction step for the multiplicative free group relation: `w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step]
inductive FreeGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
#align free_group.red.step FreeGroup.Red.Step
attribute [simp] FreeGroup.Red.Step.not
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red "Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step`"]
def Red : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop :=
ReflTransGen Red.Step
#align free_group.red FreeGroup.Red
#align free_add_group.red FreeAddGroup.Red
@[to_additive (attr := refl)]
theorem Red.refl : Red L L :=
ReflTransGen.refl
#align free_group.red.refl FreeGroup.Red.refl
#align free_add_group.red.refl FreeAddGroup.Red.refl
@[to_additive (attr := trans)]
theorem Red.trans : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₂ L₃ → Red L₁ L₃ :=
ReflTransGen.trans
#align free_group.red.trans FreeGroup.Red.trans
#align free_add_group.red.trans FreeAddGroup.Red.trans
namespace Red
/-- Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there are words
`w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃xx⁻¹w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄` -/
@[to_additive "Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there
are words `w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃ + x + (-x) + w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄`"]
theorem Step.length : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → L₂.length + 2 = L₁.length
| _, _, @Red.Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by rw [List.length_append, List.length_append]; rfl
#align free_group.red.step.length FreeGroup.Red.Step.length
#align free_add_group.red.step.length FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.length
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.not_rev {x b} : Step (L₁ ++ (x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂) := by
cases b <;> exact Step.not
#align free_group.red.step.bnot_rev FreeGroup.Red.Step.not_rev
#align free_add_group.red.step.bnot_rev FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not {x b} : Red.Step ((x, b) :: (x, !b) :: L) L :=
@Step.not _ [] _ _ _
#align free_group.red.step.cons_bnot FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_not
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_bnot FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not_rev {x b} : Red.Step ((x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L) L :=
@Red.Step.not_rev _ [] _ _ _
#align free_group.red.step.cons_bnot_rev FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_not_rev
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_bnot_rev FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_not_rev
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₂ L₃ → Step (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₁ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by rw [← List.append_assoc, ← List.append_assoc]; constructor
#align free_group.red.step.append_left FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_left
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_left FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons {x} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Red.Step (x :: L₁) (x :: L₂) :=
@Step.append_left _ [x] _ _ H
#align free_group.red.step.cons FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_right : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → Step (L₁ ++ L₃) (L₂ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by simp
#align free_group.red.step.append_right FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_right
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_right FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_right
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_nil : ¬Step [] L := by
generalize h' : [] = L'
intro h
cases' h with L₁ L₂
simp [List.nil_eq_append] at h'
#align free_group.red.not_step_nil FreeGroup.Red.not_step_nil
#align free_add_group.red.not_step_nil FreeAddGroup.Red.not_step_nil
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_left_iff {a : α} {b : Bool} :
Step ((a, b) :: L₁) L₂ ↔ (∃ L, Step L₁ L ∧ L₂ = (a, b) :: L) ∨ L₁ = (a, ! b) :: L₂ := by
constructor
· generalize hL : ((a, b) :: L₁ : List _) = L
rintro @⟨_ | ⟨p, s'⟩, e, a', b'⟩
· simp at hL
simp [*]
· simp at hL
rcases hL with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
refine Or.inl ⟨s' ++ e, Step.not, ?_⟩
simp
· rintro (⟨L, h, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact Step.cons h
· exact Step.cons_not
#align free_group.red.step.cons_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_singleton : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, ¬Step [p] L
| (a, b) => by simp [Step.cons_left_iff, not_step_nil]
#align free_group.red.not_step_singleton FreeGroup.Red.not_step_singleton
#align free_add_group.red.not_step_singleton FreeAddGroup.Red.not_step_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_cons_iff : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, Step (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [Step.cons_left_iff, iff_def, or_imp]
#align free_group.red.step.cons_cons_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_cons_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_cons_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_cons_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left_iff : ∀ L, Step (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂
| [] => by simp
| p :: l => by simp [Step.append_left_iff l, Step.cons_cons_iff]
#align free_group.red.step.append_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond_aux :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)} {x1 b1 x2 b2},
L₁ ++ (x1, b1) :: (x1, !b1) :: L₂ = L₃ ++ (x2, b2) :: (x2, !b2) :: L₄ →
L₁ ++ L₂ = L₃ ++ L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step (L₁ ++ L₂) L₅ ∧ Red.Step (L₃ ++ L₄) L₅
| [], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, [(x3, b3)], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [(x3, b3)], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; simp; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.cons_not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; simp; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.cons_not, Red.Step.not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: tl, _, (x4, b4) :: tl2, _, _, _, _, _, H =>
let ⟨H1, H2⟩ := List.cons.inj H
match Step.diamond_aux H2 with
| Or.inl H3 => Or.inl <| by simp [H1, H3]
| Or.inr ⟨L₅, H3, H4⟩ => Or.inr ⟨_, Step.cons H3, by simpa [H1] using Step.cons H4⟩
#align free_group.red.step.diamond_aux FreeGroup.Red.Step.diamond_aux
#align free_add_group.red.step.diamond_aux FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.diamond_aux
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)},
Red.Step L₁ L₃ → Red.Step L₂ L₄ → L₁ = L₂ → L₃ = L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step L₃ L₅ ∧ Red.Step L₄ L₅
| _, _, _, _, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.not, H => Step.diamond_aux H
#align free_group.red.step.diamond FreeGroup.Red.Step.diamond
#align free_add_group.red.step.diamond FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.diamond
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.to_red : Step L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₂ :=
ReflTransGen.single
#align free_group.red.step.to_red FreeGroup.Red.Step.to_red
#align free_add_group.red.step.to_red FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.to_red
/-- **Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma. -/
@[to_additive
"**Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma."]
theorem church_rosser : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₃ → Join Red L₂ L₃ :=
Relation.church_rosser fun a b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| b, c, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, hcd.to_red⟩
#align free_group.red.church_rosser FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser
#align free_add_group.red.church_rosser FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons {p} : Red L₁ L₂ → Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) :=
ReflTransGen.lift (List.cons p) fun _ _ => Step.cons
#align free_group.red.cons_cons FreeGroup.Red.cons_cons
#align free_add_group.red.cons_cons FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_cons
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons_iff (p) : Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq₁ : (p :: L₁ : List _) = LL₁
generalize eq₂ : (p :: L₂ : List _) = LL₂
intro h
induction' h using Relation.ReflTransGen.head_induction_on
with L₁ L₂ h₁₂ h ih
generalizing L₁ L₂
· subst_vars
cases eq₂
constructor
· subst_vars
cases' p with a b
rw [Step.cons_left_iff] at h₁₂
rcases h₁₂ with (⟨L, h₁₂, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact (ih rfl rfl).head h₁₂
· exact (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not_rev)
cons_cons
#align free_group.red.cons_cons_iff FreeGroup.Red.cons_cons_iff
#align free_add_group.red.cons_cons_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_cons_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append_left_iff : ∀ L, Red (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| p :: L => by simp [append_append_left_iff L, cons_cons_iff]
#align free_group.red.append_append_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.append_append_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.append_append_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.append_append_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append (h₁ : Red L₁ L₃) (h₂ : Red L₂ L₄) : Red (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₃ ++ L₄) :=
(h₁.lift (fun L => L ++ L₂) fun _ _ => Step.append_right).trans ((append_append_left_iff _).2 h₂)
#align free_group.red.append_append FreeGroup.Red.append_append
#align free_add_group.red.append_append FreeAddGroup.Red.append_append
@[to_additive]
theorem to_append_iff : Red L (L₁ ++ L₂) ↔ ∃ L₃ L₄, L = L₃ ++ L₄ ∧ Red L₃ L₁ ∧ Red L₄ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq : L₁ ++ L₂ = L₁₂
intro h
induction' h with L' L₁₂ hLL' h ih generalizing L₁ L₂
· exact ⟨_, _, eq.symm, by rfl, by rfl⟩
· cases' h with s e a b
rcases List.append_eq_append_iff.1 eq with (⟨s', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨e', rfl, rfl⟩)
· have : L₁ ++ (s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e) = L₁ ++ s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂.tail Step.not⟩
· have : s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e' ++ L₂ = s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: (e' ++ L₂) :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁.tail Step.not, h₂⟩)
fun ⟨L₃, L₄, Eq, h₃, h₄⟩ => Eq.symm ▸ append_append h₃ h₄
#align free_group.red.to_append_iff FreeGroup.Red.to_append_iff
#align free_add_group.red.to_append_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.to_append_iff
/-- The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself."]
theorem nil_iff : Red [] L ↔ L = [] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => Red.not_step_nil
#align free_group.red.nil_iff FreeGroup.Red.nil_iff
#align free_add_group.red.nil_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.nil_iff
/-- A letter only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "A letter only reduces to itself."]
theorem singleton_iff {x} : Red [x] L₁ ↔ L₁ = [x] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => not_step_singleton
#align free_group.red.singleton_iff FreeGroup.Red.singleton_iff
#align free_add_group.red.singleton_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.singleton_iff
/-- If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `xw` reduces to the empty word, then `w` reduces
to `x⁻¹` -/
@[to_additive
"If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `x + w` reduces to the empty word, then `w`
reduces to `-x`."]
theorem cons_nil_iff_singleton {x b} : Red ((x, b) :: L) [] ↔ Red L [(x, not b)] :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
have h₁ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) [(x, not b)] := cons_cons h
have h₂ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) L := ReflTransGen.single Step.cons_not_rev
let ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩ := church_rosser h₁ h₂
rw [singleton_iff] at h₁
subst L'
assumption)
fun h => (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not
#align free_group.red.cons_nil_iff_singleton FreeGroup.Red.cons_nil_iff_singleton
#align free_add_group.red.cons_nil_iff_singleton FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_nil_iff_singleton
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeGroup/Basic.lean | 342 | 350 | theorem red_iff_irreducible {x1 b1 x2 b2} (h : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2)) :
Red [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] L ↔ L = [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] := by |
apply reflTransGen_iff_eq
generalize eq : [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] = L'
intro L h'
cases h'
simp [List.cons_eq_append, List.nil_eq_append] at eq
rcases eq with ⟨rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
simp at h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
/-!
# The set lattice
This file provides usual set notation for unions and intersections, a `CompleteLattice` instance
for `Set α`, and some more set constructions.
## Main declarations
* `Set.iUnion`: **i**ndexed **union**. Union of an indexed family of sets.
* `Set.iInter`: **i**ndexed **inter**section. Intersection of an indexed family of sets.
* `Set.sInter`: **s**et **inter**section. Intersection of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `Set.sUnion`: **s**et **union**. Union of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.BooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.kernImage`: For a function `f : α → β`, `s.kernImage f` is the set of `y` such that
`f ⁻¹ y ⊆ s`.
* `Set.seq`: Union of the image of a set under a **seq**uence of functions. `seq s t` is the union
of `f '' t` over all `f ∈ s`, where `t : Set α` and `s : Set (α → β)`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
section GaloisConnection
variable {f : α → β}
protected theorem image_preimage : GaloisConnection (image f) (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
image_subset_iff
#align set.image_preimage Set.image_preimage
protected theorem preimage_kernImage : GaloisConnection (preimage f) (kernImage f) := fun _ _ =>
subset_kernImage_iff.symm
#align set.preimage_kern_image Set.preimage_kernImage
end GaloisConnection
section kernImage
variable {f : α → β}
lemma kernImage_mono : Monotone (kernImage f) :=
Set.preimage_kernImage.monotone_u
lemma kernImage_eq_compl {s : Set α} : kernImage f s = (f '' sᶜ)ᶜ :=
Set.preimage_kernImage.u_unique (Set.image_preimage.compl)
(fun t ↦ compl_compl (f ⁻¹' t) ▸ Set.preimage_compl)
lemma kernImage_compl {s : Set α} : kernImage f (sᶜ) = (f '' s)ᶜ := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, compl_compl]
lemma kernImage_empty : kernImage f ∅ = (range f)ᶜ := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, compl_empty, image_univ]
lemma kernImage_preimage_eq_iff {s : Set β} : kernImage f (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ (range f)ᶜ ⊆ s := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, ← preimage_compl, compl_eq_comm, eq_comm, image_preimage_eq_iff,
compl_subset_comm]
lemma compl_range_subset_kernImage {s : Set α} : (range f)ᶜ ⊆ kernImage f s := by
rw [← kernImage_empty]
exact kernImage_mono (empty_subset _)
lemma kernImage_union_preimage {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
kernImage f (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) = kernImage f s ∪ t := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, kernImage_eq_compl, compl_union, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage,
compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma kernImage_preimage_union {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
kernImage f (f ⁻¹' t ∪ s) = t ∪ kernImage f s := by
rw [union_comm, kernImage_union_preimage, union_comm]
end kernImage
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' j') -/
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' j') -/
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
#align set.Union_const Set.iUnion_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
#align set.Inter_const Set.iInter_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
#align set.Union_eq_const Set.iUnion_eq_const
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
#align set.Inter_eq_const Set.iInter_eq_const
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
#align set.compl_Union₂ Set.compl_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
#align set.compl_Inter Set.compl_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
#align set.compl_Inter₂ Set.compl_iInter₂
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
#align set.Union_eq_compl_Inter_compl Set.iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
#align set.Inter_eq_compl_Union_compl Set.iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
#align set.inter_Union Set.inter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
#align set.Union_inter Set.iUnion_inter
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
#align set.Union_union_distrib Set.iUnion_union_distrib
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
#align set.Inter_inter_distrib Set.iInter_inter_distrib
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
#align set.union_Union Set.union_iUnion
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
#align set.Union_union Set.iUnion_union
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
#align set.inter_Inter Set.inter_iInter
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
#align set.Inter_inter Set.iInter_inter
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_Inter Set.union_iInter
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.Inter_union Set.iInter_union
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
#align set.Union_diff Set.iUnion_diff
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
#align set.diff_Union Set.diff_iUnion
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
#align set.diff_Inter Set.diff_iInter
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
#align set.Union_inter_subset Set.iUnion_inter_subset
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_monotone Set.iUnion_inter_of_monotone
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_antitone Set.iUnion_inter_of_antitone
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_monotone Set.iInter_union_of_monotone
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_antitone Set.iInter_union_of_antitone
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
#align set.Union_Inter_subset Set.iUnion_iInter_subset
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
#align set.Union_option Set.iUnion_option
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
#align set.Inter_option Set.iInter_option
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_dite Set.iUnion_dite
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_ite Set.iUnion_ite
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_dite Set.iInter_dite
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_ite Set.iInter_ite
end
theorem image_projection_prod {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {v : ∀ i : ι, Set (α i)}
(hv : (pi univ v).Nonempty) (i : ι) :
((fun x : ∀ i : ι, α i => x i) '' ⋂ k, (fun x : ∀ j : ι, α j => x k) ⁻¹' v k) = v i := by
classical
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp [iInter_subset]
· intro y y_in
simp only [mem_image, mem_iInter, mem_preimage]
rcases hv with ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨Function.update z i y, ?_, update_same i y z⟩
rw [@forall_update_iff ι α _ z i y fun i t => t ∈ v i]
exact ⟨y_in, fun j _ => by simpa using hz j⟩
#align set.image_projection_prod Set.image_projection_prod
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
#align set.Inter_false Set.iInter_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
#align set.Union_false Set.iUnion_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
#align set.Inter_true Set.iInter_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
#align set.Union_true Set.iUnion_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
#align set.Inter_exists Set.iInter_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_exists Set.iUnion_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
#align set.Union_empty Set.iUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
#align set.Inter_univ Set.iInter_univ
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
#align set.Union_eq_empty Set.iUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
#align set.Inter_eq_univ Set.iInter_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_Union Set.nonempty_iUnion
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
#align set.nonempty_bUnion Set.nonempty_biUnion
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_nonempty_index Set.iUnion_nonempty_index
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_right Set.iInter_iInter_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align set.Union_Union_eq_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
#align set.Union_Union_eq_right Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
#align set.Inter_or Set.iInter_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
#align set.Union_or Set.iUnion_or
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (hp hq) -/
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
#align set.Union_and Set.iUnion_and
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (hp hq) -/
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
#align set.Inter_and Set.iInter_and
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i i') -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' i) -/
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
#align set.Union_comm Set.iUnion_comm
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i i') -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' i) -/
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
#align set.Inter_comm Set.iInter_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) -/
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
#align set.Union₂_comm Set.iUnion₂_comm
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) -/
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
#align set.Inter₂_comm Set.iInter₂_comm
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
#align set.bUnion_and Set.biUnion_and
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_and' Set.biUnion_and'
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
#align set.bInter_and Set.biInter_and
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_and' Set.biInter_and'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x h) -/
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
#align set.Union_Union_eq_or_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x h) -/
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_or_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_or_left
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
#align set.mem_bUnion Set.mem_biUnion
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
#align set.mem_bInter Set.mem_biInter
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
-- Porting note: Why is this not just `subset_iUnion₂ x xs`?
@subset_iUnion₂ β α (· ∈ s) (fun i _ => u i) x xs
#align set.subset_bUnion_of_mem Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
#align set.bInter_subset_of_mem Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bInter_subset_bInter_left Set.biInter_subset_biInter_left
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
#align set.bUnion_mono Set.biUnion_mono
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
#align set.bInter_mono Set.biInter_mono
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.bUnion_eq_Union Set.biUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
#align set.bInter_eq_Inter Set.biInter_eq_iInter
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
#align set.Union_subtype Set.iUnion_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
#align set.Inter_subtype Set.iInter_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align set.bInter_empty Set.biInter_empty
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
#align set.bInter_univ Set.biInter_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
#align set.bUnion_self Set.biUnion_self
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
#align set.Union_nonempty_self Set.iUnion_nonempty_self
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
#align set.bInter_singleton Set.biInter_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
#align set.bInter_union Set.biInter_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bInter_insert Set.biInter_insert
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
#align set.bInter_pair Set.biInter_pair
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
#align set.bInter_inter Set.biInter_inter
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
#align set.inter_bInter Set.inter_biInter
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
#align set.bUnion_empty Set.biUnion_empty
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
#align set.bUnion_univ Set.biUnion_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
#align set.bUnion_singleton Set.biUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.bUnion_of_singleton Set.biUnion_of_singleton
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
#align set.bUnion_union Set.biUnion_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
#align set.Union_coe_set Set.iUnion_coe_set
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
#align set.Inter_coe_set Set.iInter_coe_set
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bUnion_insert Set.biUnion_insert
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
#align set.bUnion_pair Set.biUnion_pair
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
#align set.inter_Union₂ Set.inter_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
#align set.Union₂_inter Set.iUnion₂_inter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
#align set.union_Inter₂ Set.union_iInter₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
#align set.Inter₂_union Set.iInter₂_union
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
#align set.mem_sUnion_of_mem Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
#align set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion Set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
#align set.sInter_subset_of_mem Set.sInter_subset_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀S :=
le_sSup tS
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_mem Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_subset Set.subset_sUnion_of_subset
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
#align set.sUnion_subset Set.sUnion_subset
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
#align set.sUnion_subset_iff Set.sUnion_subset_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
#align set.subset_sInter Set.subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
#align set.subset_sInter_iff Set.subset_sInter_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀S ⊆ ⋃₀T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sUnion_subset_sUnion Set.sUnion_subset_sUnion
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sInter_subset_sInter Set.sInter_subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
#align set.sUnion_empty Set.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
#align set.sInter_empty Set.sInter_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀{s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
#align set.sUnion_singleton Set.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
#align set.sInter_singleton Set.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
#align set.sUnion_eq_empty Set.sUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
#align set.sInter_eq_univ Set.sInter_eq_univ
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnion_powerset_gi :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_sUnion Set.nonempty_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(S ∪ T) = ⋃₀S ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_union
#align set.sUnion_union Set.sUnion_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
#align set.sInter_union Set.sInter_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_insert
#align set.sUnion_insert Set.sUnion_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
#align set.sInter_insert Set.sInter_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
#align set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty Set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
#align set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ Set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀{s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
#align set.sUnion_pair Set.sUnion_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
#align set.sInter_pair Set.sInter_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀(f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sSup_image
#align set.sUnion_image Set.sUnion_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
sInf_image
#align set.sInter_image Set.sInter_image
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sUnion_range Set.sUnion_range
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sInter_range Set.sInter_range
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion_eq_univ_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union₂_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff Set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.Inter_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter_eq_empty_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
#align set.Inter₂_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter₂_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.sInter_eq_empty_iff Set.sInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_Inter Set.nonempty_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- classical
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
#align set.nonempty_Inter₂ Set.nonempty_iInter₂
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_sInter Set.nonempty_sInter
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.compl_sUnion Set.compl_sUnion
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀S), compl_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl Set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀(compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
#align set.compl_sInter Set.compl_sInter
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀(compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
#align set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl Set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
#align set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty Set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align set.range_sigma_eq_Union_range Set.range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_sigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_sigma
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_psigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_psigma
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
cases' x with i a
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
#align set.Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self Set.iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
#align set.sigma.univ Set.Sigma.univ
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
#align set.sUnion_mono Set.sUnion_mono
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
#align set.Union_subset_Union_const Set.iUnion_subset_iUnion_const
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
#align set.Union_singleton_eq_range Set.iUnion_singleton_eq_range
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_of_singleton Set.iUnion_of_singleton
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
#align set.Union_of_singleton_coe Set.iUnion_of_singleton_coe
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
#align set.sUnion_eq_bUnion Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
#align set.sInter_eq_bInter Set.sInter_eq_biInter
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sUnion_eq_Union Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sInter_eq_Inter Set.sInter_eq_iInter
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
#align set.Union_of_empty Set.iUnion_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
#align set.Inter_of_empty Set.iInter_of_empty
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
#align set.union_eq_Union Set.union_eq_iUnion
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
#align set.inter_eq_Inter Set.inter_eq_iInter
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
#align set.sInter_union_sInter Set.sInter_union_sInter
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀s ∩ ⋃₀t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
#align set.sUnion_inter_sUnion Set.sUnion_inter_sUnion
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_Union Set.biUnion_iUnion
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_Union Set.biInter_iUnion
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
#align set.sUnion_Union Set.sUnion_iUnion
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
#align set.sInter_Union Set.sInter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
cases' hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
#align set.Union_range_eq_sUnion Set.iUnion_range_eq_sUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
cases' hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
#align set.Union_range_eq_Union Set.iUnion_range_eq_iUnion
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_left Set.union_distrib_iInter_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_left Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_right Set.union_distrib_iInter_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_right Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_right
section Function
/-! ### Lemmas about `Set.MapsTo`
Porting note: some lemmas in this section were upgraded from implications to `iff`s.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, MapsTo f s t :=
sUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_sUnion Set.mapsTo_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) t :=
iUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) t :=
iUnion₂_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂
theorem mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iUnion.2 fun i ↦ (H i).mono_right (subset_iUnion t i)
#align set.maps_to_Union_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Union₂_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sInter {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂₀ T) ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, MapsTo f s t :=
forall₂_swap
#align set.maps_to_sInter Set.mapsTo_sInter
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f s (t i) :=
mapsTo_sInter.trans forall_mem_range
#align set.maps_to_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f s (t i j) := by
simp only [mapsTo_iInter]
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂
theorem mapsTo_iInter_iInter {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iInter.2 fun i => (H i).mono_left (iInter_subset s i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_iInter_iInter (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂
theorem image_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : (f '' ⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, f '' s i :=
(mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_image f (s i)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter_subset Set.image_iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iInter₂_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (f : α → β) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j :=
(mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ fun i hi => mapsTo_image f (s i hi)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter₂_subset Set.image_iInter₂_subset
theorem image_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) : f '' ⋂₀ S ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, f '' s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
apply image_iInter₂_subset
#align set.image_sInter_subset Set.image_sInter_subset
/-! ### `restrictPreimage` -/
section
open Function
variable (s : Set β) {f : α → β} {U : ι → Set β} (hU : iUnion U = univ)
theorem injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Injective f ↔ ∀ i, Injective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_injective H, fun H x y e => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show f x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
injection @H i ⟨x, hi⟩ ⟨y, show f y ∈ U i from e ▸ hi⟩ (Subtype.ext e)
#align set.injective_iff_injective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Surjective f ↔ ∀ i, Surjective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_surjective H, fun H x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
exact ⟨_, congr_arg Subtype.val (H i ⟨x, hi⟩).choose_spec⟩
#align set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Bijective f ↔ ∀ i, Bijective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
rw [Bijective, injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU,
surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU]
simp [Bijective, forall_and]
#align set.bijective_iff_bijective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
end
/-! ### `InjOn` -/
theorem InjOn.image_iInter_eq [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {f : α → β} (h : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) :
(f '' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' s i := by
inhabit ι
refine Subset.antisymm (image_iInter_subset s f) fun y hy => ?_
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_image] at hy
choose x hx hy using hy
refine ⟨x default, mem_iInter.2 fun i => ?_, hy _⟩
suffices x default = x i by
rw [this]
apply hx
replace hx : ∀ i, x i ∈ ⋃ j, s j := fun i => (subset_iUnion _ _) (hx i)
apply h (hx _) (hx _)
simp only [hy]
#align set.inj_on.image_Inter_eq Set.InjOn.image_iInter_eq
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
theorem InjOn.image_biInter_eq {p : ι → Prop} {s : ∀ i, p i → Set α} (hp : ∃ i, p i)
{f : α → β} (h : InjOn f (⋃ (i) (hi), s i hi)) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (hi), s i hi) = ⋂ (i) (hi), f '' s i hi := by
simp only [iInter, iInf_subtype']
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 hp
apply InjOn.image_iInter_eq
simpa only [iUnion, iSup_subtype'] using h
#align set.inj_on.image_bInter_eq Set.InjOn.image_biInter_eq
theorem image_iInter {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (s : ι → Set α) :
(f '' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' s i := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp_rw [iInter_of_empty, image_univ_of_surjective hf.surjective]
· exact hf.injective.injOn.image_iInter_eq
#align set.image_Inter Set.image_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iInter₂ {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iInter hf]
#align set.image_Inter₂ Set.image_iInter₂
theorem inj_on_iUnion_of_directed {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, InjOn f (s i)) : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hx with ⟨i, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hy with ⟨j, hy⟩
rcases hs i j with ⟨k, hi, hj⟩
exact hf k (hi hx) (hj hy) hxy
#align set.inj_on_Union_of_directed Set.inj_on_iUnion_of_directed
/-! ### `SurjOn` -/
theorem surjOn_sUnion {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ t ∈ T, SurjOn f s t) :
SurjOn f s (⋃₀T) := fun _ ⟨t, ht, hx⟩ => H t ht hx
#align set.surj_on_sUnion Set.surjOn_sUnion
theorem surjOn_iUnion {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, SurjOn f s (t i)) :
SurjOn f s (⋃ i, t i) :=
surjOn_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 H
#align set.surj_on_Union Set.surjOn_iUnion
theorem surjOn_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) (t i)) : SurjOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
surjOn_iUnion fun i => (H i).mono (subset_iUnion _ _) (Subset.refl _)
#align set.surj_on_Union_Union Set.surjOn_iUnion_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem surjOn_iUnion₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, SurjOn f s (t i j)) : SurjOn f s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
surjOn_iUnion fun i => surjOn_iUnion (H i)
#align set.surj_on_Union₂ Set.surjOn_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem surjOn_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, SurjOn f (s i j) (t i j)) : SurjOn f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
surjOn_iUnion_iUnion fun i => surjOn_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.surj_on_Union₂_Union₂ Set.surjOn_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
theorem surjOn_iInter [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) t) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : SurjOn f (⋂ i, s i) t := by
intro y hy
rw [Hinj.image_iInter_eq, mem_iInter]
exact fun i => H i hy
#align set.surj_on_Inter Set.surjOn_iInter
theorem surjOn_iInter_iInter [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : SurjOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
surjOn_iInter (fun i => (H i).mono (Subset.refl _) (iInter_subset _ _)) Hinj
#align set.surj_on_Inter_Inter Set.surjOn_iInter_iInter
/-! ### `BijOn` -/
theorem bijOn_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i))
(Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : BijOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
⟨mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => (H i).mapsTo, Hinj, surjOn_iUnion_iUnion fun i => (H i).surjOn⟩
#align set.bij_on_Union Set.bijOn_iUnion
theorem bijOn_iInter [hi : Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : BijOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
⟨mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => (H i).mapsTo,
hi.elim fun i => (H i).injOn.mono (iInter_subset _ _),
surjOn_iInter_iInter (fun i => (H i).surjOn) Hinj⟩
#align set.bij_on_Inter Set.bijOn_iInter
theorem bijOn_iUnion_of_directed {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) {t : ι → Set β}
{f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) : BijOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
bijOn_iUnion H <| inj_on_iUnion_of_directed hs fun i => (H i).injOn
#align set.bij_on_Union_of_directed Set.bijOn_iUnion_of_directed
theorem bijOn_iInter_of_directed [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) : BijOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
bijOn_iInter H <| inj_on_iUnion_of_directed hs fun i => (H i).injOn
#align set.bij_on_Inter_of_directed Set.bijOn_iInter_of_directed
end Function
/-! ### `image`, `preimage` -/
section Image
theorem image_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set α} : (f '' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f '' s i := by
ext1 x
simp only [mem_image, mem_iUnion, ← exists_and_right, ← exists_and_left]
-- Porting note: `exists_swap` causes a `simp` loop in Lean4 so we use `rw` instead.
rw [exists_swap]
#align set.image_Union Set.image_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iUnion₂ (f : α → β) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iUnion]
#align set.image_Union₂ Set.image_iUnion₂
theorem univ_subtype {p : α → Prop} : (univ : Set (Subtype p)) = ⋃ (x) (h : p x), {⟨x, h⟩} :=
Set.ext fun ⟨x, h⟩ => by simp [h]
#align set.univ_subtype Set.univ_subtype
theorem range_eq_iUnion {ι} (f : ι → α) : range f = ⋃ i, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [@eq_comm α a]
#align set.range_eq_Union Set.range_eq_iUnion
theorem image_eq_iUnion (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = ⋃ i ∈ s, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [@eq_comm β b]
#align set.image_eq_Union Set.image_eq_iUnion
theorem biUnion_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋃ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) :=
iSup_range
#align set.bUnion_range Set.biUnion_range
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x y) -/
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋃ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) := by simpa using biUnion_range
#align set.Union_Union_eq' Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq'
theorem biInter_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋂ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋂ y, g (f y) :=
iInf_range
#align set.bInter_range Set.biInter_range
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x y) -/
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋂ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋂ y, g (f y) := by simpa using biInter_range
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq' Set.iInter_iInter_eq'
variable {s : Set γ} {f : γ → α} {g : α → Set β}
theorem biUnion_image : ⋃ x ∈ f '' s, g x = ⋃ y ∈ s, g (f y) :=
iSup_image
#align set.bUnion_image Set.biUnion_image
theorem biInter_image : ⋂ x ∈ f '' s, g x = ⋂ y ∈ s, g (f y) :=
iInf_image
#align set.bInter_image Set.biInter_image
end Image
section Preimage
theorem monotone_preimage {f : α → β} : Monotone (preimage f) := fun _ _ h => preimage_mono h
#align set.monotone_preimage Set.monotone_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f ⁻¹' s i :=
Set.ext <| by simp [preimage]
#align set.preimage_Union Set.preimage_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem preimage_iUnion₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by simp_rw [preimage_iUnion]
#align set.preimage_Union₂ Set.preimage_iUnion₂
theorem image_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set α)} : (f '' ⋃₀ s) = ⋃₀ (image f '' s) := by
ext b
simp only [mem_image, mem_sUnion, exists_prop, sUnion_image, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, ht₁, a, ht₂, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨t, ht₁, a, ht₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} : f ⁻¹' ⋃₀s = ⋃ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, preimage_iUnion₂]
#align set.preimage_sUnion Set.preimage_sUnion
theorem preimage_iInter {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f ⁻¹' s i := by
ext; simp
#align set.preimage_Inter Set.preimage_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem preimage_iInter₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by simp_rw [preimage_iInter]
#align set.preimage_Inter₂ Set.preimage_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sInter {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} : f ⁻¹' ⋂₀ s = ⋂ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, preimage_iInter₂]
#align set.preimage_sInter Set.preimage_sInter
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : ⋃ y ∈ s, f ⁻¹' {y} = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [← preimage_iUnion₂, biUnion_of_singleton]
#align set.bUnion_preimage_singleton Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton
theorem biUnion_range_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) : ⋃ y ∈ range f, f ⁻¹' {y} = univ := by
rw [biUnion_preimage_singleton, preimage_range]
#align set.bUnion_range_preimage_singleton Set.biUnion_range_preimage_singleton
end Preimage
section Prod
theorem prod_iUnion {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} : (s ×ˢ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ×ˢ t i := by
ext
simp
#align set.prod_Union Set.prod_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem prod_iUnion₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(s ×ˢ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ×ˢ t i j := by simp_rw [prod_iUnion]
#align set.prod_Union₂ Set.prod_iUnion₂
theorem prod_sUnion {s : Set α} {C : Set (Set β)} : s ×ˢ ⋃₀C = ⋃₀((fun t => s ×ˢ t) '' C) := by
simp_rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_image, prod_iUnion₂]
#align set.prod_sUnion Set.prod_sUnion
theorem iUnion_prod_const {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} : (⋃ i, s i) ×ˢ t = ⋃ i, s i ×ˢ t := by
ext
simp
#align set.Union_prod_const Set.iUnion_prod_const
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_prod_const {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ×ˢ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ×ˢ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_prod_const]
#align set.Union₂_prod_const Set.iUnion₂_prod_const
theorem sUnion_prod_const {C : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} :
⋃₀C ×ˢ t = ⋃₀((fun s : Set α => s ×ˢ t) '' C) := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, iUnion₂_prod_const, biUnion_image]
#align set.sUnion_prod_const Set.sUnion_prod_const
theorem iUnion_prod {ι ι' α β} (s : ι → Set α) (t : ι' → Set β) :
⋃ x : ι × ι', s x.1 ×ˢ t x.2 = (⋃ i : ι, s i) ×ˢ ⋃ i : ι', t i := by
ext
simp
#align set.Union_prod Set.iUnion_prod
/-- Analogue of `iSup_prod` for sets. -/
lemma iUnion_prod' (f : β × γ → Set α) : ⋃ x : β × γ, f x = ⋃ (i : β) (j : γ), f (i, j) :=
iSup_prod
theorem iUnion_prod_of_monotone [SemilatticeSup α] {s : α → Set β} {t : α → Set γ} (hs : Monotone s)
(ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ x, s x ×ˢ t x = (⋃ x, s x) ×ˢ ⋃ x, t x := by
ext ⟨z, w⟩; simp only [mem_prod, mem_iUnion, exists_imp, and_imp, iff_def]; constructor
· intro x hz hw
exact ⟨⟨x, hz⟩, x, hw⟩
· intro x hz x' hw
exact ⟨x ⊔ x', hs le_sup_left hz, ht le_sup_right hw⟩
#align set.Union_prod_of_monotone Set.iUnion_prod_of_monotone
theorem sInter_prod_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (T : Set (Set β)) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂ r ∈ S ×ˢ T, r.1 ×ˢ r.2 :=
subset_iInter₂ fun x hx _ hy => ⟨hy.1 x.1 hx.1, hy.2 x.2 hx.2⟩
#align set.sInter_prod_sInter_subset Set.sInter_prod_sInter_subset
theorem sInter_prod_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {T : Set (Set β)} (hS : S.Nonempty) (hT : T.Nonempty) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ r ∈ S ×ˢ T, r.1 ×ˢ r.2 := by
obtain ⟨s₁, h₁⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨s₂, h₂⟩ := hT
refine Set.Subset.antisymm (sInter_prod_sInter_subset S T) fun x hx => ?_
rw [mem_iInter₂] at hx
exact ⟨fun s₀ h₀ => (hx (s₀, s₂) ⟨h₀, h₂⟩).1, fun s₀ h₀ => (hx (s₁, s₀) ⟨h₁, h₀⟩).2⟩
#align set.sInter_prod_sInter Set.sInter_prod_sInter
theorem sInter_prod {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Nonempty) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ t = ⋂ s ∈ S, s ×ˢ t := by
rw [← sInter_singleton t, sInter_prod_sInter hS (singleton_nonempty t), sInter_singleton]
simp_rw [prod_singleton, mem_image, iInter_exists, biInter_and', iInter_iInter_eq_right]
#align set.sInter_prod Set.sInter_prod
theorem prod_sInter {T : Set (Set β)} (hT : T.Nonempty) (s : Set α) :
s ×ˢ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ t ∈ T, s ×ˢ t := by
rw [← sInter_singleton s, sInter_prod_sInter (singleton_nonempty s) hT, sInter_singleton]
simp_rw [singleton_prod, mem_image, iInter_exists, biInter_and', iInter_iInter_eq_right]
#align set.prod_sInter Set.prod_sInter
theorem prod_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} [hι : Nonempty ι] :
(s ×ˢ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ×ˢ t i := by
ext x
simp only [mem_prod, mem_iInter]
exact ⟨fun h i => ⟨h.1, h.2 i⟩, fun h => ⟨(h hι.some).1, fun i => (h i).2⟩⟩
#align prod_Inter Set.prod_iInter
end Prod
section Image2
variable (f : α → β → γ) {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
/-- The `Set.image2` version of `Set.image_eq_iUnion` -/
theorem image2_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = ⋃ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t), {f i j} := by
ext; simp [eq_comm]
#align set.image2_eq_Union Set.image2_eq_iUnion
theorem iUnion_image_left : ⋃ a ∈ s, f a '' t = image2 f s t := by
simp only [image2_eq_iUnion, image_eq_iUnion]
#align set.Union_image_left Set.iUnion_image_left
theorem iUnion_image_right : ⋃ b ∈ t, (f · b) '' s = image2 f s t := by
rw [image2_swap, iUnion_image_left]
#align set.Union_image_right Set.iUnion_image_right
theorem image2_iUnion_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋃ i, s i) t = ⋃ i, image2 f (s i) t := by
simp only [← image_prod, iUnion_prod_const, image_iUnion]
#align set.image2_Union_left Set.image2_iUnion_left
theorem image2_iUnion_right (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, image2 f s (t i) := by
simp only [← image_prod, prod_iUnion, image_iUnion]
#align set.image2_Union_right Set.image2_iUnion_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iUnion₂_left (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t = ⋃ (i) (j), image2 f (s i j) t := by simp_rw [image2_iUnion_left]
#align set.image2_Union₂_left Set.image2_iUnion₂_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iUnion₂_right (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), image2 f s (t i j) := by
simp_rw [image2_iUnion_right]
#align set.image2_Union₂_right Set.image2_iUnion₂_right
theorem image2_iInter_subset_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋂ i, s i) t ⊆ ⋂ i, image2 f (s i) t := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i => mem_image2_of_mem (hx _) hy
#align set.image2_Inter_subset_left Set.image2_iInter_subset_left
theorem image2_iInter_subset_right (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, image2 f s (t i) := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i => mem_image2_of_mem hx (hy _)
#align set.image2_Inter_subset_right Set.image2_iInter_subset_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iInter₂_subset_left (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) t ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), image2 f (s i j) t := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i j => mem_image2_of_mem (hx _ _) hy
#align set.image2_Inter₂_subset_left Set.image2_iInter₂_subset_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iInter₂_subset_right (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), image2 f s (t i j) := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i j => mem_image2_of_mem hx (hy _ _)
#align set.image2_Inter₂_subset_right Set.image2_iInter₂_subset_right
theorem prod_eq_biUnion_left : s ×ˢ t = ⋃ a ∈ s, (fun b => (a, b)) '' t := by
rw [iUnion_image_left, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_bUnion_left Set.prod_eq_biUnion_left
theorem prod_eq_biUnion_right : s ×ˢ t = ⋃ b ∈ t, (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
rw [iUnion_image_right, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_bUnion_right Set.prod_eq_biUnion_right
end Image2
section Seq
theorem seq_def {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} : seq s t = ⋃ f ∈ s, f '' t := by
rw [seq_eq_image2, iUnion_image_left]
#align set.seq_def Set.seq_def
theorem seq_subset {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} {u : Set β} :
seq s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, ∀ a ∈ t, (f : α → β) a ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
#align set.seq_subset Set.seq_subset
@[gcongr]
theorem seq_mono {s₀ s₁ : Set (α → β)} {t₀ t₁ : Set α} (hs : s₀ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₀ ⊆ t₁) :
seq s₀ t₀ ⊆ seq s₁ t₁ := image2_subset hs ht
#align set.seq_mono Set.seq_mono
theorem singleton_seq {f : α → β} {t : Set α} : Set.seq ({f} : Set (α → β)) t = f '' t :=
image2_singleton_left
#align set.singleton_seq Set.singleton_seq
theorem seq_singleton {s : Set (α → β)} {a : α} : Set.seq s {a} = (fun f : α → β => f a) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
#align set.seq_singleton Set.seq_singleton
theorem seq_seq {s : Set (β → γ)} {t : Set (α → β)} {u : Set α} :
seq s (seq t u) = seq (seq ((· ∘ ·) '' s) t) u := by
simp only [seq_eq_image2, image2_image_left]
exact .symm <| image2_assoc fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl
#align set.seq_seq Set.seq_seq
theorem image_seq {f : β → γ} {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} :
f '' seq s t = seq ((f ∘ ·) '' s) t := by
simp only [seq, image_image2, image2_image_left, comp_apply]
#align set.image_seq Set.image_seq
theorem prod_eq_seq {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : s ×ˢ t = (Prod.mk '' s).seq t := by
rw [seq_eq_image2, image2_image_left, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_seq Set.prod_eq_seq
theorem prod_image_seq_comm (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(Prod.mk '' s).seq t = seq ((fun b a => (a, b)) '' t) s := by
rw [← prod_eq_seq, ← image_swap_prod, prod_eq_seq, image_seq, ← image_comp]; rfl
#align set.prod_image_seq_comm Set.prod_image_seq_comm
theorem image2_eq_seq (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = seq (f '' s) t := by
rw [seq_eq_image2, image2_image_left]
#align set.image2_eq_seq Set.image2_eq_seq
end Seq
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,982 | 1,984 | theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by |
ext
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Circumcenter
#align_import geometry.euclidean.monge_point from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1a4df69ca1a9a0e5e26bfe12e2b92814216016d0"
/-!
# Monge point and orthocenter
This file defines the orthocenter of a triangle, via its n-dimensional
generalization, the Monge point of a simplex.
## Main definitions
* `mongePoint` is the Monge point of a simplex, defined in terms of
its position on the Euler line and then shown to be the point of
concurrence of the Monge planes.
* `mongePlane` is a Monge plane of an (n+2)-simplex, which is the
(n+1)-dimensional affine subspace of the subspace spanned by the
simplex that passes through the centroid of an n-dimensional face
and is orthogonal to the opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the
same as an altitude).
* `altitude` is the line that passes through a vertex of a simplex and
is orthogonal to the opposite face.
* `orthocenter` is defined, for the case of a triangle, to be the same
as its Monge point, then shown to be the point of concurrence of the
altitudes.
* `OrthocentricSystem` is a predicate on sets of points that says
whether they are four points, one of which is the orthocenter of the
other three (in which case various other properties hold, including
that each is the orthocenter of the other three).
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altitude_(triangle)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monge_point>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthocentric_system>
* Małgorzata Buba-Brzozowa, [The Monge Point and the 3(n+1) Point
Sphere of an
n-Simplex](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f8b/0f623459c76dac2e49255737f8f0f4725d16.pdf)
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry PointsWithCircumcenterIndex
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The Monge point of a simplex (in 2 or more dimensions) is a
generalization of the orthocenter of a triangle. It is defined to be
the intersection of the Monge planes, where a Monge plane is the
(n-1)-dimensional affine subspace of the subspace spanned by the
simplex that passes through the centroid of an (n-2)-dimensional face
and is orthogonal to the opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the
same as an altitude). The circumcenter O, centroid G and Monge point
M are collinear in that order on the Euler line, with OG : GM = (n-1): 2.
Here, we use that ratio to define the Monge point (so resulting
in a point that equals the centroid in 0 or 1 dimensions), and then
show in subsequent lemmas that the point so defined lies in the Monge
planes and is their unique point of intersection. -/
def mongePoint {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
(((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) / ((n - 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)) •
((univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))).centroid ℝ s.points -ᵥ s.circumcenter) +ᵥ
s.circumcenter
#align affine.simplex.monge_point Affine.Simplex.mongePoint
/-- The position of the Monge point in relation to the circumcenter
and centroid. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.mongePoint =
(((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) / ((n - 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)) •
((univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))).centroid ℝ s.points -ᵥ s.circumcenter) +ᵥ
s.circumcenter :=
rfl
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter Affine.Simplex.mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter
/-- The Monge point lies in the affine span. -/
theorem mongePoint_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.mongePoint ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ (centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (card_fin (n + 1)))
s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_mem_affine_span Affine.Simplex.mongePoint_mem_affineSpan
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same Monge point. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(h : Set.range s₁.points = Set.range s₂.points) : s₁.mongePoint = s₂.mongePoint := by
simp_rw [mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter, centroid_eq_of_range_eq h,
circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq h]
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_eq_of_range_eq Affine.Simplex.mongePoint_eq_of_range_eq
/-- The weights for the Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2) → ℝ
| pointIndex _ => ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹
| circumcenterIndex => -2 / ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter Affine.Simplex.mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter
/-- `mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, sum_const, card_fin,
nsmul_eq_mul]
-- Porting note: replaced
-- have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Nat.succ_ne_zero _
field_simp [n.cast_add_one_ne_zero]
ring
#align affine.simplex.sum_monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter Affine.Simplex.sum_mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) :
s.mongePoint =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2))).affineCombination ℝ
s.pointsWithCircumcenter (mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n) := by
rw [mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, affineCombination_vsub,
← LinearMap.map_smul, weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination]
congr with i
rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Pi.sub_apply]
-- Porting note: replaced
-- have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Nat.succ_ne_zero _
have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := n.cast_add_one_ne_zero
cases i <;>
simp_rw [centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter] <;>
rw [add_tsub_assoc_of_le (by decide : 1 ≤ 2), (by decide : 2 - 1 = 1)]
· rw [if_pos (mem_univ _), sub_zero, add_zero, card_fin]
-- Porting note: replaced
-- have hn3 : (n + 2 + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Nat.succ_ne_zero _
have hn3 : (n + 2 + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
field_simp [hn1, hn3, mul_comm]
· field_simp [hn1]
ring
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter Affine.Simplex.mongePoint_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter
/-- The weights for the Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the
centroid of an n-dimensional face, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. This definition is only valid when `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2) → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0
| circumcenterIndex => -2 / ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter Affine.Simplex.mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter
/-- `mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` is the
result of subtracting `centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` from
`mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ =
mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n - centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {i₁, i₂}ᶜ := by
ext i
cases' i with i
· rw [Pi.sub_apply, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter]
have hu : card ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))) = n + 1 := by
simp [card_compl, Fintype.card_fin, h]
rw [hu]
by_cases hi : i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ <;> simp [compl_eq_univ_sdiff, hi]
· simp [mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter]
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter_eq_sub Affine.Simplex.mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub
/-- `mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : ∑ i, mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 0 := by
rw [mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub h]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib, sum_mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
rw [sum_centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, sub_self]
simp [← card_pos, card_compl, h]
#align affine.simplex.sum_monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter Affine.Simplex.sum_mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the centroid of an
n-dimensional face, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weightedVSub_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
s.mongePoint -ᵥ ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2))).weightedVSub s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂) := by
simp_rw [mongePoint_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, affineCombination_vsub,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub h]
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weighted_vsub_of_points_with_circumcenter Affine.Simplex.mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weightedVSub_of_pointsWithCircumcenter
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the centroid of an
n-dimensional face, is orthogonal to the difference of the two
vertices not in that face. -/
theorem inner_mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_vsub {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2))
{i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} :
⟪s.mongePoint -ᵥ ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points,
s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂⟫ =
0 := by
by_cases h : i₁ = i₂
· simp [h]
simp_rw [mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weightedVSub_of_pointsWithCircumcenter s h,
point_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, affineCombination_vsub]
have hs : ∑ i, (pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ - pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i₂) i = 0 := by
simp
rw [inner_weightedVSub _ (sum_mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter h) _ hs,
sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter]
simp only [mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, pointsWithCircumcenter_point]
let fs : Finset (Fin (n + 3)) := {i₁, i₂}
have hfs : ∀ i : Fin (n + 3), i ∉ fs → i ≠ i₁ ∧ i ≠ i₂ := by
intro i hi
constructor <;> · intro hj; simp [fs, ← hj] at hi
rw [← sum_subset fs.subset_univ _]
· simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter,
pointsWithCircumcenter_point, Pi.sub_apply, pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
rw [← sum_subset fs.subset_univ _]
· simp_rw [sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), sum_singleton]
repeat rw [← sum_subset fs.subset_univ _]
· simp_rw [sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), sum_singleton]
simp [h, Ne.symm h, dist_comm (s.points i₁)]
all_goals intro i _ hi; simp [hfs i hi]
· intro i _ hi
simp [hfs i hi, pointsWithCircumcenter]
· intro i _ hi
simp [hfs i hi]
#align affine.simplex.inner_monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_vsub Affine.Simplex.inner_mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_vsub
/-- A Monge plane of an (n+2)-simplex is the (n+1)-dimensional affine
subspace of the subspace spanned by the simplex that passes through
the centroid of an n-dimensional face and is orthogonal to the
opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the same as an altitude).
This definition is only intended to be used when `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def mongePlane {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
mk' (({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points) (ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ ⊓
affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)
#align affine.simplex.monge_plane Affine.Simplex.mongePlane
/-- The definition of a Monge plane. -/
theorem mongePlane_def {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) :
s.mongePlane i₁ i₂ =
mk' (({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points)
(ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ ⊓
affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
rfl
#align affine.simplex.monge_plane_def Affine.Simplex.mongePlane_def
/-- The Monge plane associated with vertices `i₁` and `i₂` equals that
associated with `i₂` and `i₁`. -/
theorem mongePlane_comm {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) :
s.mongePlane i₁ i₂ = s.mongePlane i₂ i₁ := by
simp_rw [mongePlane_def]
congr 3
· congr 1
exact pair_comm _ _
· ext
simp_rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
constructor
all_goals rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩; use -r; rw [neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
#align affine.simplex.monge_plane_comm Affine.Simplex.mongePlane_comm
/-- The Monge point lies in the Monge planes. -/
theorem mongePoint_mem_mongePlane {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} :
s.mongePoint ∈ s.mongePlane i₁ i₂ := by
rw [mongePlane_def, mem_inf_iff, ← vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (self_mem_mk' _ _),
direction_mk', Submodule.mem_orthogonal']
refine ⟨?_, s.mongePoint_mem_affineSpan⟩
intro v hv
rcases Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hv with ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [inner_smul_right, s.inner_mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_vsub, mul_zero]
#align affine.simplex.monge_point_mem_monge_plane Affine.Simplex.mongePoint_mem_mongePlane
/-- The direction of a Monge plane. -/
theorem direction_mongePlane {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} :
(s.mongePlane i₁ i₂).direction =
(ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ ⊓ vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) := by
rw [mongePlane_def, direction_inf_of_mem_inf s.mongePoint_mem_mongePlane, direction_mk',
direction_affineSpan]
#align affine.simplex.direction_monge_plane Affine.Simplex.direction_mongePlane
/-- The Monge point is the only point in all the Monge planes from any
one vertex. -/
theorem eq_mongePoint_of_forall_mem_mongePlane {n : ℕ} {s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)} {i₁ : Fin (n + 3)}
{p : P} (h : ∀ i₂, i₁ ≠ i₂ → p ∈ s.mongePlane i₁ i₂) : p = s.mongePoint := by
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V]
have h' : ∀ i₂, i₁ ≠ i₂ → p -ᵥ s.mongePoint ∈
(ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ ⊓ vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) := by
intro i₂ hne
rw [← s.direction_mongePlane, vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem s.mongePoint_mem_mongePlane]
exact h i₂ hne
have hi : p -ᵥ s.mongePoint ∈ ⨅ i₂ : { i // i₁ ≠ i }, (ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ := by
rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
exact fun i => (Submodule.mem_inf.1 (h' i i.property)).1
rw [Submodule.iInf_orthogonal, ← Submodule.span_iUnion] at hi
have hu :
⋃ i : { i // i₁ ≠ i }, ({s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i} : Set V) =
(s.points i₁ -ᵥ ·) '' (s.points '' (Set.univ \ {i₁})) := by
rw [Set.image_image]
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Set.mem_diff_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
use i, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, i.property.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨i, ⟨-, hi⟩, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `use ⟨i, hi.symm⟩, rfl`
exact ⟨⟨i, hi.symm⟩, rfl⟩
rw [hu, ← vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne ℝ _ (Set.mem_univ _), Set.image_univ] at hi
have hv : p -ᵥ s.mongePoint ∈ vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) := by
let s₁ : Finset (Fin (n + 3)) := univ.erase i₁
obtain ⟨i₂, h₂⟩ := card_pos.1 (show 0 < card s₁ by simp [s₁, card_erase_of_mem])
have h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂ := (ne_of_mem_erase h₂).symm
exact (Submodule.mem_inf.1 (h' i₂ h₁₂)).2
exact Submodule.disjoint_def.1 (vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)).orthogonal_disjoint _ hv hi
#align affine.simplex.eq_monge_point_of_forall_mem_monge_plane Affine.Simplex.eq_mongePoint_of_forall_mem_mongePlane
/-- An altitude of a simplex is the line that passes through a vertex
and is orthogonal to the opposite face. -/
def altitude {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : Fin (n + 2)) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
mk' (s.points i) (affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' ↑(univ.erase i))).directionᗮ ⊓
affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)
#align affine.simplex.altitude Affine.Simplex.altitude
/-- The definition of an altitude. -/
theorem altitude_def {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : Fin (n + 2)) :
s.altitude i =
mk' (s.points i) (affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' ↑(univ.erase i))).directionᗮ ⊓
affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
rfl
#align affine.simplex.altitude_def Affine.Simplex.altitude_def
/-- A vertex lies in the corresponding altitude. -/
theorem mem_altitude {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : Fin (n + 2)) :
s.points i ∈ s.altitude i :=
(mem_inf_iff _ _ _).2 ⟨self_mem_mk' _ _, mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_range_self _)⟩
#align affine.simplex.mem_altitude Affine.Simplex.mem_altitude
/-- The direction of an altitude. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/MongePoint.lean | 352 | 357 | theorem direction_altitude {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : Fin (n + 2)) :
(s.altitude i).direction =
(vectorSpan ℝ (s.points '' ↑(Finset.univ.erase i)))ᗮ ⊓ vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) := by |
rw [altitude_def,
direction_inf_of_mem (self_mem_mk' (s.points i) _) (mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_range_self _)),
direction_mk', direction_affineSpan, direction_affineSpan]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
#align_import data.finset.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Lattice operations on finsets
-/
-- TODO:
-- assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function Multiset OrderDual
variable {F α β γ ι κ : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-! ### sup -/
section Sup
-- TODO: define with just `[Bot α]` where some lemmas hold without requiring `[OrderBot α]`
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α]
/-- Supremum of a finite set: `sup {a, b, c} f = f a ⊔ f b ⊔ f c` -/
def sup (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ f
#align finset.sup Finset.sup
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f g : β → α} {a : α}
theorem sup_def : s.sup f = (s.1.map f).sup :=
rfl
#align finset.sup_def Finset.sup_def
@[simp]
theorem sup_empty : (∅ : Finset β).sup f = ⊥ :=
fold_empty
#align finset.sup_empty Finset.sup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_cons {b : β} (h : b ∉ s) : (cons b s h).sup f = f b ⊔ s.sup f :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.sup_cons Finset.sup_cons
@[simp]
theorem sup_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} : (insert b s : Finset β).sup f = f b ⊔ s.sup f :=
fold_insert_idem
#align finset.sup_insert Finset.sup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sup_image [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (f : γ → β) (g : β → α) :
(s.image f).sup g = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
fold_image_idem
#align finset.sup_image Finset.sup_image
@[simp]
theorem sup_map (s : Finset γ) (f : γ ↪ β) (g : β → α) : (s.map f).sup g = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
fold_map
#align finset.sup_map Finset.sup_map
@[simp]
theorem sup_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).sup f = f b :=
Multiset.sup_singleton
#align finset.sup_singleton Finset.sup_singleton
theorem sup_sup : s.sup (f ⊔ g) = s.sup f ⊔ s.sup g := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => rw [sup_empty, sup_empty, sup_empty, bot_sup_eq]
| cons _ _ _ ih =>
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, sup_cons, ih]
exact sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.sup_sup Finset.sup_sup
theorem sup_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.sup f = s₂.sup g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
#align finset.sup_congr Finset.sup_congr
@[simp]
theorem _root_.map_finset_sup [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β]
[FunLike F α β] [SupBotHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α) : f (s.sup g) = s.sup (f ∘ g) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (map_bot f) fun i s _ h => by
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, map_sup, h, Function.comp_apply]
#align map_finset_sup map_finset_sup
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_le_iff {a : α} : s.sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.sup_le
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb => k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h => h ▸ k _ hb⟩
#align finset.sup_le_iff Finset.sup_le_iff
protected alias ⟨_, sup_le⟩ := Finset.sup_le_iff
#align finset.sup_le Finset.sup_le
theorem sup_const_le : (s.sup fun _ => a) ≤ a :=
Finset.sup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
#align finset.sup_const_le Finset.sup_const_le
theorem le_sup {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ≤ s.sup f :=
Finset.sup_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ hb
#align finset.le_sup Finset.le_sup
theorem le_sup_of_le {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ f b) : a ≤ s.sup f := h.trans <| le_sup hb
#align finset.le_sup_of_le Finset.le_sup_of_le
theorem sup_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).sup f = s₁.sup f ⊔ s₂.sup f :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp [or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.sup_union Finset.sup_union
@[simp]
theorem sup_biUnion [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset β) :
(s.biUnion t).sup f = s.sup fun x => (t x).sup f :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp [@forall_swap _ β]
#align finset.sup_bUnion Finset.sup_biUnion
theorem sup_const {s : Finset β} (h : s.Nonempty) (c : α) : (s.sup fun _ => c) = c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff (fun _ => Finset.sup_le_iff.trans h.forall_const)
#align finset.sup_const Finset.sup_const
@[simp]
theorem sup_bot (s : Finset β) : (s.sup fun _ => ⊥) = (⊥ : α) := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact sup_empty
· exact sup_const hs _
#align finset.sup_bot Finset.sup_bot
theorem sup_ite (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.sup fun i => ite (p i) (f i) (g i)) = (s.filter p).sup f ⊔ (s.filter fun i => ¬p i).sup g :=
fold_ite _
#align finset.sup_ite Finset.sup_ite
theorem sup_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ g b) : s.sup f ≤ s.sup g :=
Finset.sup_le fun b hb => le_trans (h b hb) (le_sup hb)
#align finset.sup_mono_fun Finset.sup_mono_fun
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.sup f ≤ s₂.sup f :=
Finset.sup_le (fun _ hb => le_sup (h hb))
#align finset.sup_mono Finset.sup_mono
protected theorem sup_comm (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β → γ → α) :
(s.sup fun b => t.sup (f b)) = t.sup fun c => s.sup fun b => f b c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simpa using forall₂_swap
#align finset.sup_comm Finset.sup_comm
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS does not simplify
theorem sup_attach (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : (s.attach.sup fun x => f x) = s.sup f :=
(s.attach.sup_map (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f).symm.trans <| congr_arg _ attach_map_val
#align finset.sup_attach Finset.sup_attach
/-- See also `Finset.product_biUnion`. -/
theorem sup_product_left (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).sup f = s.sup fun i => t.sup fun i' => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simp [@forall_swap _ γ]
#align finset.sup_product_left Finset.sup_product_left
theorem sup_product_right (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).sup f = t.sup fun i' => s.sup fun i => f ⟨i, i'⟩ := by
rw [sup_product_left, Finset.sup_comm]
#align finset.sup_product_right Finset.sup_product_right
section Prod
variable {ι κ α β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β]
{s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ}
@[simp] lemma sup_prodMap (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
sup (s ×ˢ t) (Prod.map f g) = (sup s f, sup t g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun i ↦ by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
simp only [Prod.map, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_product, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.le_def]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun i hi ↦ (h _ _ hi hb).1, fun j hj ↦ (h _ _ ha hj).2⟩, by aesop⟩
end Prod
@[simp]
theorem sup_erase_bot [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : (s.erase ⊥).sup id = s.sup id := by
refine (sup_mono (s.erase_subset _)).antisymm (Finset.sup_le_iff.2 fun a ha => ?_)
obtain rfl | ha' := eq_or_ne a ⊥
· exact bot_le
· exact le_sup (mem_erase.2 ⟨ha', ha⟩)
#align finset.sup_erase_bot Finset.sup_erase_bot
theorem sup_sdiff_right {α β : Type*} [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → α)
(a : α) : (s.sup fun b => f b \ a) = s.sup f \ a := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => rw [sup_empty, sup_empty, bot_sdiff]
| cons _ _ _ h => rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, h, sup_sdiff]
#align finset.sup_sdiff_right Finset.sup_sdiff_right
theorem comp_sup_eq_sup_comp [SemilatticeSup γ] [OrderBot γ] {s : Finset β} {f : β → α} (g : α → γ)
(g_sup : ∀ x y, g (x ⊔ y) = g x ⊔ g y) (bot : g ⊥ = ⊥) : g (s.sup f) = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s bot fun c t hc ih => by
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, g_sup, ih, Function.comp_apply]
#align finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp
/-- Computing `sup` in a subtype (closed under `sup`) is the same as computing it in `α`. -/
theorem sup_coe {P : α → Prop} {Pbot : P ⊥} {Psup : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)} (t : Finset β)
(f : β → { x : α // P x }) :
(@sup { x // P x } _ (Subtype.semilatticeSup Psup) (Subtype.orderBot Pbot) t f : α) =
t.sup fun x => ↑(f x) := by
letI := Subtype.semilatticeSup Psup
letI := Subtype.orderBot Pbot
apply comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Subtype.val <;> intros <;> rfl
#align finset.sup_coe Finset.sup_coe
@[simp]
theorem sup_toFinset {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → Multiset β) :
(s.sup f).toFinset = s.sup fun x => (f x).toFinset :=
comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Multiset.toFinset toFinset_union rfl
#align finset.sup_to_finset Finset.sup_toFinset
theorem _root_.List.foldr_sup_eq_sup_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ = l.toFinset.sup id := by
rw [← coe_fold_r, ← Multiset.fold_dedup_idem, sup_def, ← List.toFinset_coe, toFinset_val,
Multiset.map_id]
rfl
#align list.foldr_sup_eq_sup_to_finset List.foldr_sup_eq_sup_toFinset
theorem subset_range_sup_succ (s : Finset ℕ) : s ⊆ range (s.sup id).succ := fun _ hn =>
mem_range.2 <| Nat.lt_succ_of_le <| @le_sup _ _ _ _ _ id _ hn
#align finset.subset_range_sup_succ Finset.subset_range_sup_succ
theorem exists_nat_subset_range (s : Finset ℕ) : ∃ n : ℕ, s ⊆ range n :=
⟨_, s.subset_range_sup_succ⟩
#align finset.exists_nat_subset_range Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
theorem sup_induction {p : α → Prop} (hb : p ⊥) (hp : ∀ a₁, p a₁ → ∀ a₂, p a₂ → p (a₁ ⊔ a₂))
(hs : ∀ b ∈ s, p (f b)) : p (s.sup f) := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => exact hb
| cons _ _ _ ih =>
simp only [sup_cons, forall_mem_cons] at hs ⊢
exact hp _ hs.1 _ (ih hs.2)
#align finset.sup_induction Finset.sup_induction
theorem sup_le_of_le_directed {α : Type*} [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] (s : Set α)
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) (t : Finset α) :
(∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) → ∃ x ∈ s, t.sup id ≤ x := by
classical
induction' t using Finset.induction_on with a r _ ih h
· simpa only [forall_prop_of_true, and_true_iff, forall_prop_of_false, bot_le, not_false_iff,
sup_empty, forall_true_iff, not_mem_empty]
· intro h
have incs : (r : Set α) ⊆ ↑(insert a r) := by
rw [Finset.coe_subset]
apply Finset.subset_insert
-- x ∈ s is above the sup of r
obtain ⟨x, ⟨hxs, hsx_sup⟩⟩ := ih fun x hx => h x <| incs hx
-- y ∈ s is above a
obtain ⟨y, hys, hay⟩ := h a (Finset.mem_insert_self a r)
-- z ∈ s is above x and y
obtain ⟨z, hzs, ⟨hxz, hyz⟩⟩ := hdir x hxs y hys
use z, hzs
rw [sup_insert, id, sup_le_iff]
exact ⟨le_trans hay hyz, le_trans hsx_sup hxz⟩
#align finset.sup_le_of_le_directed Finset.sup_le_of_le_directed
-- If we acquire sublattices
-- the hypotheses should be reformulated as `s : SubsemilatticeSupBot`
theorem sup_mem (s : Set α) (w₁ : ⊥ ∈ s) (w₂ : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ⊔ y ∈ s)
{ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (p : ι → α) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) : t.sup p ∈ s :=
@sup_induction _ _ _ _ _ _ (· ∈ s) w₁ w₂ h
#align finset.sup_mem Finset.sup_mem
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_eq_bot_iff (f : β → α) (S : Finset β) : S.sup f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, f s = ⊥ := by
classical induction' S using Finset.induction with a S _ hi <;> simp [*]
#align finset.sup_eq_bot_iff Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff
end Sup
theorem sup_eq_iSup [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : s.sup f = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a :=
le_antisymm
(Finset.sup_le (fun a ha => le_iSup_of_le a <| le_iSup (fun _ => f a) ha))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun ha => le_sup ha)
#align finset.sup_eq_supr Finset.sup_eq_iSup
theorem sup_id_eq_sSup [CompleteLattice α] (s : Finset α) : s.sup id = sSup s := by
simp [sSup_eq_iSup, sup_eq_iSup]
#align finset.sup_id_eq_Sup Finset.sup_id_eq_sSup
theorem sup_id_set_eq_sUnion (s : Finset (Set α)) : s.sup id = ⋃₀ ↑s :=
sup_id_eq_sSup _
#align finset.sup_id_set_eq_sUnion Finset.sup_id_set_eq_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem sup_set_eq_biUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Set β) : s.sup f = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sup_eq_iSup _ _
#align finset.sup_set_eq_bUnion Finset.sup_set_eq_biUnion
theorem sup_eq_sSup_image [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
s.sup f = sSup (f '' s) := by
classical rw [← Finset.coe_image, ← sup_id_eq_sSup, sup_image, Function.id_comp]
#align finset.sup_eq_Sup_image Finset.sup_eq_sSup_image
/-! ### inf -/
section Inf
-- TODO: define with just `[Top α]` where some lemmas hold without requiring `[OrderTop α]`
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α]
/-- Infimum of a finite set: `inf {a, b, c} f = f a ⊓ f b ⊓ f c` -/
def inf (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold (· ⊓ ·) ⊤ f
#align finset.inf Finset.inf
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f g : β → α} {a : α}
theorem inf_def : s.inf f = (s.1.map f).inf :=
rfl
#align finset.inf_def Finset.inf_def
@[simp]
theorem inf_empty : (∅ : Finset β).inf f = ⊤ :=
fold_empty
#align finset.inf_empty Finset.inf_empty
@[simp]
theorem inf_cons {b : β} (h : b ∉ s) : (cons b s h).inf f = f b ⊓ s.inf f :=
@sup_cons αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align finset.inf_cons Finset.inf_cons
@[simp]
theorem inf_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} : (insert b s : Finset β).inf f = f b ⊓ s.inf f :=
fold_insert_idem
#align finset.inf_insert Finset.inf_insert
@[simp]
theorem inf_image [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (f : γ → β) (g : β → α) :
(s.image f).inf g = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
fold_image_idem
#align finset.inf_image Finset.inf_image
@[simp]
theorem inf_map (s : Finset γ) (f : γ ↪ β) (g : β → α) : (s.map f).inf g = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
fold_map
#align finset.inf_map Finset.inf_map
@[simp]
theorem inf_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).inf f = f b :=
Multiset.inf_singleton
#align finset.inf_singleton Finset.inf_singleton
theorem inf_inf : s.inf (f ⊓ g) = s.inf f ⊓ s.inf g :=
@sup_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_inf Finset.inf_inf
theorem inf_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.inf f = s₂.inf g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
#align finset.inf_congr Finset.inf_congr
@[simp]
theorem _root_.map_finset_inf [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β]
[FunLike F α β] [InfTopHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α) : f (s.inf g) = s.inf (f ∘ g) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (map_top f) fun i s _ h => by
rw [inf_cons, inf_cons, map_inf, h, Function.comp_apply]
#align map_finset_inf map_finset_inf
@[simp] protected theorem le_inf_iff {a : α} : a ≤ s.inf f ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ f b :=
@Finset.sup_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.le_inf_iff Finset.le_inf_iff
protected alias ⟨_, le_inf⟩ := Finset.le_inf_iff
#align finset.le_inf Finset.le_inf
theorem le_inf_const_le : a ≤ s.inf fun _ => a :=
Finset.le_inf fun _ _ => le_rfl
#align finset.le_inf_const_le Finset.le_inf_const_le
theorem inf_le {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : s.inf f ≤ f b :=
Finset.le_inf_iff.1 le_rfl _ hb
#align finset.inf_le Finset.inf_le
theorem inf_le_of_le {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) (h : f b ≤ a) : s.inf f ≤ a := (inf_le hb).trans h
#align finset.inf_le_of_le Finset.inf_le_of_le
theorem inf_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).inf f = s₁.inf f ⊓ s₂.inf f :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c ↦ by simp [or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.inf_union Finset.inf_union
@[simp] theorem inf_biUnion [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset β) :
(s.biUnion t).inf f = s.inf fun x => (t x).inf f :=
@sup_biUnion αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_bUnion Finset.inf_biUnion
theorem inf_const (h : s.Nonempty) (c : α) : (s.inf fun _ => c) = c := @sup_const αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ h _
#align finset.inf_const Finset.inf_const
@[simp] theorem inf_top (s : Finset β) : (s.inf fun _ => ⊤) = (⊤ : α) := @sup_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_top Finset.inf_top
theorem inf_ite (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.inf fun i ↦ ite (p i) (f i) (g i)) = (s.filter p).inf f ⊓ (s.filter fun i ↦ ¬ p i).inf g :=
fold_ite _
theorem inf_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ g b) : s.inf f ≤ s.inf g :=
Finset.le_inf fun b hb => le_trans (inf_le hb) (h b hb)
#align finset.inf_mono_fun Finset.inf_mono_fun
@[gcongr]
theorem inf_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.inf f ≤ s₁.inf f :=
Finset.le_inf (fun _ hb => inf_le (h hb))
#align finset.inf_mono Finset.inf_mono
protected theorem inf_comm (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β → γ → α) :
(s.inf fun b => t.inf (f b)) = t.inf fun c => s.inf fun b => f b c :=
@Finset.sup_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_comm Finset.inf_comm
theorem inf_attach (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : (s.attach.inf fun x => f x) = s.inf f :=
@sup_attach αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_attach Finset.inf_attach
theorem inf_product_left (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).inf f = s.inf fun i => t.inf fun i' => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
@sup_product_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_product_left Finset.inf_product_left
theorem inf_product_right (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).inf f = t.inf fun i' => s.inf fun i => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
@sup_product_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_product_right Finset.inf_product_right
section Prod
variable {ι κ α β : Type*} [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β]
{s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ}
@[simp] lemma inf_prodMap (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
inf (s ×ˢ t) (Prod.map f g) = (inf s f, inf t g) :=
sup_prodMap (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) hs ht _ _
end Prod
@[simp]
theorem inf_erase_top [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : (s.erase ⊤).inf id = s.inf id :=
@sup_erase_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_erase_top Finset.inf_erase_top
theorem comp_inf_eq_inf_comp [SemilatticeInf γ] [OrderTop γ] {s : Finset β} {f : β → α} (g : α → γ)
(g_inf : ∀ x y, g (x ⊓ y) = g x ⊓ g y) (top : g ⊤ = ⊤) : g (s.inf f) = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
@comp_sup_eq_sup_comp αᵒᵈ _ γᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ g_inf top
#align finset.comp_inf_eq_inf_comp Finset.comp_inf_eq_inf_comp
/-- Computing `inf` in a subtype (closed under `inf`) is the same as computing it in `α`. -/
theorem inf_coe {P : α → Prop} {Ptop : P ⊤} {Pinf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)} (t : Finset β)
(f : β → { x : α // P x }) :
(@inf { x // P x } _ (Subtype.semilatticeInf Pinf) (Subtype.orderTop Ptop) t f : α) =
t.inf fun x => ↑(f x) :=
@sup_coe αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ Ptop Pinf t f
#align finset.inf_coe Finset.inf_coe
theorem _root_.List.foldr_inf_eq_inf_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤ = l.toFinset.inf id := by
rw [← coe_fold_r, ← Multiset.fold_dedup_idem, inf_def, ← List.toFinset_coe, toFinset_val,
Multiset.map_id]
rfl
#align list.foldr_inf_eq_inf_to_finset List.foldr_inf_eq_inf_toFinset
theorem inf_induction {p : α → Prop} (ht : p ⊤) (hp : ∀ a₁, p a₁ → ∀ a₂, p a₂ → p (a₁ ⊓ a₂))
(hs : ∀ b ∈ s, p (f b)) : p (s.inf f) :=
@sup_induction αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ ht hp hs
#align finset.inf_induction Finset.inf_induction
theorem inf_mem (s : Set α) (w₁ : ⊤ ∈ s) (w₂ : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ⊓ y ∈ s)
{ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (p : ι → α) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) : t.inf p ∈ s :=
@inf_induction _ _ _ _ _ _ (· ∈ s) w₁ w₂ h
#align finset.inf_mem Finset.inf_mem
@[simp]
protected theorem inf_eq_top_iff (f : β → α) (S : Finset β) : S.inf f = ⊤ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, f s = ⊤ :=
@Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_eq_top_iff Finset.inf_eq_top_iff
end Inf
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sup [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
toDual (s.sup f) = s.inf (toDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.to_dual_sup Finset.toDual_sup
@[simp]
theorem toDual_inf [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
toDual (s.inf f) = s.sup (toDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.to_dual_inf Finset.toDual_inf
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sup [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → αᵒᵈ) :
ofDual (s.sup f) = s.inf (ofDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.of_dual_sup Finset.ofDual_sup
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_inf [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → αᵒᵈ) :
ofDual (s.inf f) = s.sup (ofDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.of_dual_inf Finset.ofDual_inf
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α]
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α} {a : α}
theorem sup_inf_distrib_left (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
a ⊓ s.sup f = s.sup fun i => a ⊓ f i := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => simp_rw [Finset.sup_empty, inf_bot_eq]
| cons _ _ _ h => rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, inf_sup_left, h]
#align finset.sup_inf_distrib_left Finset.sup_inf_distrib_left
theorem sup_inf_distrib_right (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
s.sup f ⊓ a = s.sup fun i => f i ⊓ a := by
rw [_root_.inf_comm, s.sup_inf_distrib_left]
simp_rw [_root_.inf_comm]
#align finset.sup_inf_distrib_right Finset.sup_inf_distrib_right
protected theorem disjoint_sup_right : Disjoint a (s.sup f) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Disjoint a (f i) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, sup_inf_distrib_left, Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align finset.disjoint_sup_right Finset.disjoint_sup_right
protected theorem disjoint_sup_left : Disjoint (s.sup f) a ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Disjoint (f i) a := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, sup_inf_distrib_right, Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align finset.disjoint_sup_left Finset.disjoint_sup_left
theorem sup_inf_sup (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α) :
s.sup f ⊓ t.sup g = (s ×ˢ t).sup fun i => f i.1 ⊓ g i.2 := by
simp_rw [Finset.sup_inf_distrib_right, Finset.sup_inf_distrib_left, sup_product_left]
#align finset.sup_inf_sup Finset.sup_inf_sup
end OrderBot
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α] {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α} {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {a : α}
theorem inf_sup_distrib_left (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
a ⊔ s.inf f = s.inf fun i => a ⊔ f i :=
@sup_inf_distrib_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_sup_distrib_left Finset.inf_sup_distrib_left
theorem inf_sup_distrib_right (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
s.inf f ⊔ a = s.inf fun i => f i ⊔ a :=
@sup_inf_distrib_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_sup_distrib_right Finset.inf_sup_distrib_right
protected theorem codisjoint_inf_right :
Codisjoint a (s.inf f) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Codisjoint a (f i) :=
@Finset.disjoint_sup_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.codisjoint_inf_right Finset.codisjoint_inf_right
protected theorem codisjoint_inf_left :
Codisjoint (s.inf f) a ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Codisjoint (f i) a :=
@Finset.disjoint_sup_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.codisjoint_inf_left Finset.codisjoint_inf_left
theorem inf_sup_inf (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α) :
s.inf f ⊔ t.inf g = (s ×ˢ t).inf fun i => f i.1 ⊔ g i.2 :=
@sup_inf_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_sup_inf Finset.inf_sup_inf
end OrderTop
section BoundedOrder
variable [BoundedOrder α] [DecidableEq ι]
--TODO: Extract out the obvious isomorphism `(insert i s).pi t ≃ t i ×ˢ s.pi t` from this proof
theorem inf_sup {κ : ι → Type*} (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i)) (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
(s.inf fun i => (t i).sup (f i)) =
(s.pi t).sup fun g => s.attach.inf fun i => f _ <| g _ i.2 := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with i s hi ih
· simp
rw [inf_insert, ih, attach_insert, sup_inf_sup]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
simp only [Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_product, mem_pi, and_imp, Prod.forall,
inf_insert, inf_image]
refine
⟨fun h g hg =>
h (g i <| mem_insert_self _ _) (fun j hj => g j <| mem_insert_of_mem hj)
(hg _ <| mem_insert_self _ _) fun j hj => hg _ <| mem_insert_of_mem hj,
fun h a g ha hg => ?_⟩
-- TODO: This `have` must be named to prevent it being shadowed by the internal `this` in `simpa`
have aux : ∀ j : { x // x ∈ s }, ↑j ≠ i := fun j : s => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem j.2 hi
-- Porting note: `simpa` doesn't support placeholders in proof terms
have := h (fun j hj => if hji : j = i then cast (congr_arg κ hji.symm) a
else g _ <| mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne hj hji) (fun j hj => ?_)
· simpa only [cast_eq, dif_pos, Function.comp, Subtype.coe_mk, dif_neg, aux] using this
rw [mem_insert] at hj
obtain (rfl | hj) := hj
· simpa
· simpa [ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi] using hg _ _
#align finset.inf_sup Finset.inf_sup
theorem sup_inf {κ : ι → Type*} (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i)) (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
(s.sup fun i => (t i).inf (f i)) = (s.pi t).inf fun g => s.attach.sup fun i => f _ <| g _ i.2 :=
@inf_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.sup_inf Finset.sup_inf
end BoundedOrder
end DistribLattice
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] {s : Finset ι}
theorem sup_sdiff_left (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.sup fun b => a \ f b) = a \ s.inf f := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => rw [sup_empty, inf_empty, sdiff_top]
| cons _ _ _ h => rw [sup_cons, inf_cons, h, sdiff_inf]
#align finset.sup_sdiff_left Finset.sup_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_left (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.inf fun b => a \ f b) = a \ s.sup f := by
induction hs using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => rw [sup_singleton, inf_singleton]
| cons _ _ _ _ ih => rw [sup_cons, inf_cons, ih, sdiff_sup]
#align finset.inf_sdiff_left Finset.inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.inf fun b => f b \ a) = s.inf f \ a := by
induction hs using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => rw [inf_singleton, inf_singleton]
| cons _ _ _ _ ih => rw [inf_cons, inf_cons, ih, inf_sdiff]
#align finset.inf_sdiff_right Finset.inf_sdiff_right
theorem inf_himp_right (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.inf fun b => f b ⇨ a) = s.sup f ⇨ a :=
@sup_sdiff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_himp_right Finset.inf_himp_right
theorem sup_himp_right (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.sup fun b => f b ⇨ a) = s.inf f ⇨ a :=
@inf_sdiff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ hs _ _
#align finset.sup_himp_right Finset.sup_himp_right
theorem sup_himp_left (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.sup fun b => a ⇨ f b) = a ⇨ s.sup f :=
@inf_sdiff_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ hs _ _
#align finset.sup_himp_left Finset.sup_himp_left
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_sup (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) : (s.sup f)ᶜ = s.inf fun i => (f i)ᶜ :=
map_finset_sup (OrderIso.compl α) _ _
#align finset.compl_sup Finset.compl_sup
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_inf (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) : (s.inf f)ᶜ = s.sup fun i => (f i)ᶜ :=
map_finset_inf (OrderIso.compl α) _ _
#align finset.compl_inf Finset.compl_inf
end BooleanAlgebra
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {a : α}
theorem comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] (g : α → β)
(mono_g : Monotone g) (bot : g ⊥ = ⊥) : g (s.sup f) = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
comp_sup_eq_sup_comp g mono_g.map_sup bot
#align finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total
@[simp]
protected theorem le_sup_iff (ha : ⊥ < a) : a ≤ s.sup f ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ f b := by
apply Iff.intro
· induction s using cons_induction with
| empty => exact (absurd · (not_le_of_lt ha))
| cons c t hc ih =>
rw [sup_cons, le_sup_iff]
exact fun
| Or.inl h => ⟨c, mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl), h⟩
| Or.inr h => let ⟨b, hb, hle⟩ := ih h; ⟨b, mem_cons.2 (Or.inr hb), hle⟩
· exact fun ⟨b, hb, hle⟩ => le_trans hle (le_sup hb)
#align finset.le_sup_iff Finset.le_sup_iff
@[simp]
protected theorem lt_sup_iff : a < s.sup f ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < f b := by
apply Iff.intro
· induction s using cons_induction with
| empty => exact (absurd · not_lt_bot)
| cons c t hc ih =>
rw [sup_cons, lt_sup_iff]
exact fun
| Or.inl h => ⟨c, mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl), h⟩
| Or.inr h => let ⟨b, hb, hlt⟩ := ih h; ⟨b, mem_cons.2 (Or.inr hb), hlt⟩
· exact fun ⟨b, hb, hlt⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le hlt (le_sup hb)
#align finset.lt_sup_iff Finset.lt_sup_iff
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_lt_iff (ha : ⊥ < a) : s.sup f < a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b < a :=
⟨fun hs b hb => lt_of_le_of_lt (le_sup hb) hs,
Finset.cons_induction_on s (fun _ => ha) fun c t hc => by
simpa only [sup_cons, sup_lt_iff, mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] using And.imp_right⟩
#align finset.sup_lt_iff Finset.sup_lt_iff
end OrderBot
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {a : α}
theorem comp_inf_eq_inf_comp_of_is_total [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] (g : α → β)
(mono_g : Monotone g) (top : g ⊤ = ⊤) : g (s.inf f) = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
comp_inf_eq_inf_comp g mono_g.map_inf top
#align finset.comp_inf_eq_inf_comp_of_is_total Finset.comp_inf_eq_inf_comp_of_is_total
@[simp]
protected theorem inf_le_iff (ha : a < ⊤) : s.inf f ≤ a ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, f b ≤ a :=
@Finset.le_sup_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ ha
#align finset.inf_le_iff Finset.inf_le_iff
@[simp]
protected theorem inf_lt_iff : s.inf f < a ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, f b < a :=
@Finset.lt_sup_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_lt_iff Finset.inf_lt_iff
@[simp]
protected theorem lt_inf_iff (ha : a < ⊤) : a < s.inf f ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a < f b :=
@Finset.sup_lt_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ ha
#align finset.lt_inf_iff Finset.lt_inf_iff
end OrderTop
end LinearOrder
theorem inf_eq_iInf [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : s.inf f = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
@sup_eq_iSup _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_eq_infi Finset.inf_eq_iInf
theorem inf_id_eq_sInf [CompleteLattice α] (s : Finset α) : s.inf id = sInf s :=
@sup_id_eq_sSup αᵒᵈ _ _
#align finset.inf_id_eq_Inf Finset.inf_id_eq_sInf
theorem inf_id_set_eq_sInter (s : Finset (Set α)) : s.inf id = ⋂₀ ↑s :=
inf_id_eq_sInf _
#align finset.inf_id_set_eq_sInter Finset.inf_id_set_eq_sInter
@[simp]
theorem inf_set_eq_iInter (s : Finset α) (f : α → Set β) : s.inf f = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
inf_eq_iInf _ _
#align finset.inf_set_eq_bInter Finset.inf_set_eq_iInter
theorem inf_eq_sInf_image [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
s.inf f = sInf (f '' s) :=
@sup_eq_sSup_image _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_eq_Inf_image Finset.inf_eq_sInf_image
section Sup'
variable [SemilatticeSup α]
theorem sup_of_mem {s : Finset β} (f : β → α) {b : β} (h : b ∈ s) :
∃ a : α, s.sup ((↑) ∘ f : β → WithBot α) = ↑a :=
Exists.imp (fun _ => And.left) (@le_sup (WithBot α) _ _ _ _ _ _ h (f b) rfl)
#align finset.sup_of_mem Finset.sup_of_mem
/-- Given nonempty finset `s` then `s.sup' H f` is the supremum of its image under `f` in (possibly
unbounded) join-semilattice `α`, where `H` is a proof of nonemptiness. If `α` has a bottom element
you may instead use `Finset.sup` which does not require `s` nonempty. -/
def sup' (s : Finset β) (H : s.Nonempty) (f : β → α) : α :=
WithBot.unbot (s.sup ((↑) ∘ f)) (by simpa using H)
#align finset.sup' Finset.sup'
variable {s : Finset β} (H : s.Nonempty) (f : β → α)
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup' : ((s.sup' H f : α) : WithBot α) = s.sup ((↑) ∘ f) := by
rw [sup', WithBot.coe_unbot]
#align finset.coe_sup' Finset.coe_sup'
@[simp]
theorem sup'_cons {b : β} {hb : b ∉ s} :
(cons b s hb).sup' (nonempty_cons hb) f = f b ⊔ s.sup' H f := by
rw [← WithBot.coe_eq_coe]
simp [WithBot.coe_sup]
#align finset.sup'_cons Finset.sup'_cons
@[simp]
theorem sup'_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s).sup' (insert_nonempty _ _) f = f b ⊔ s.sup' H f := by
rw [← WithBot.coe_eq_coe]
simp [WithBot.coe_sup]
#align finset.sup'_insert Finset.sup'_insert
@[simp]
theorem sup'_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).sup' (singleton_nonempty _) f = f b :=
rfl
#align finset.sup'_singleton Finset.sup'_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sup'_le_iff {a : α} : s.sup' H f ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ a := by
simp_rw [← @WithBot.coe_le_coe α, coe_sup', Finset.sup_le_iff]; rfl
#align finset.sup'_le_iff Finset.sup'_le_iff
alias ⟨_, sup'_le⟩ := sup'_le_iff
#align finset.sup'_le Finset.sup'_le
theorem le_sup' {b : β} (h : b ∈ s) : f b ≤ s.sup' ⟨b, h⟩ f :=
(sup'_le_iff ⟨b, h⟩ f).1 le_rfl b h
#align finset.le_sup' Finset.le_sup'
theorem le_sup'_of_le {a : α} {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ f b) : a ≤ s.sup' ⟨b, hb⟩ f :=
h.trans <| le_sup' _ hb
#align finset.le_sup'_of_le Finset.le_sup'_of_le
@[simp]
theorem sup'_const (a : α) : s.sup' H (fun _ => a) = a := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply sup'_le
intros
exact le_rfl
· apply le_sup' (fun _ => a) H.choose_spec
#align finset.sup'_const Finset.sup'_const
theorem sup'_union [DecidableEq β] {s₁ s₂ : Finset β} (h₁ : s₁.Nonempty) (h₂ : s₂.Nonempty)
(f : β → α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).sup' (h₁.mono subset_union_left) f = s₁.sup' h₁ f ⊔ s₂.sup' h₂ f :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simp [or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.sup'_union Finset.sup'_union
theorem sup'_biUnion [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset γ} (Hs : s.Nonempty) {t : γ → Finset β}
(Ht : ∀ b, (t b).Nonempty) :
(s.biUnion t).sup' (Hs.biUnion fun b _ => Ht b) f = s.sup' Hs (fun b => (t b).sup' (Ht b) f) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp [@forall_swap _ β]
#align finset.sup'_bUnion Finset.sup'_biUnion
protected theorem sup'_comm {t : Finset γ} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : β → γ → α) :
(s.sup' hs fun b => t.sup' ht (f b)) = t.sup' ht fun c => s.sup' hs fun b => f b c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simpa using forall₂_swap
#align finset.sup'_comm Finset.sup'_comm
theorem sup'_product_left {t : Finset γ} (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).sup' h f = s.sup' h.fst fun i => t.sup' h.snd fun i' => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simp [@forall_swap _ γ]
#align finset.sup'_product_left Finset.sup'_product_left
theorem sup'_product_right {t : Finset γ} (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).sup' h f = t.sup' h.snd fun i' => s.sup' h.fst fun i => f ⟨i, i'⟩ := by
rw [sup'_product_left, Finset.sup'_comm]
#align finset.sup'_product_right Finset.sup'_product_right
section Prod
variable {ι κ α β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ}
/-- See also `Finset.sup'_prodMap`. -/
lemma prodMk_sup'_sup' (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
(sup' s hs f, sup' t ht g) = sup' (s ×ˢ t) (hs.product ht) (Prod.map f g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun i ↦ by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
simp only [Prod.map, sup'_le_iff, mem_product, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.le_def]
exact ⟨by aesop, fun h ↦ ⟨fun i hi ↦ (h _ _ hi hb).1, fun j hj ↦ (h _ _ ha hj).2⟩⟩
/-- See also `Finset.prodMk_sup'_sup'`. -/
-- @[simp] -- TODO: Why does `Prod.map_apply` simplify the LHS?
lemma sup'_prodMap (hst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
sup' (s ×ˢ t) hst (Prod.map f g) = (sup' s hst.fst f, sup' t hst.snd g) :=
(prodMk_sup'_sup' _ _ _ _).symm
end Prod
theorem sup'_induction {p : α → Prop} (hp : ∀ a₁, p a₁ → ∀ a₂, p a₂ → p (a₁ ⊔ a₂))
(hs : ∀ b ∈ s, p (f b)) : p (s.sup' H f) := by
show @WithBot.recBotCoe α (fun _ => Prop) True p ↑(s.sup' H f)
rw [coe_sup']
refine sup_induction trivial (fun a₁ h₁ a₂ h₂ ↦ ?_) hs
match a₁, a₂ with
| ⊥, _ => rwa [bot_sup_eq]
| (a₁ : α), ⊥ => rwa [sup_bot_eq]
| (a₁ : α), (a₂ : α) => exact hp a₁ h₁ a₂ h₂
#align finset.sup'_induction Finset.sup'_induction
theorem sup'_mem (s : Set α) (w : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ⊔ y ∈ s) {ι : Type*}
(t : Finset ι) (H : t.Nonempty) (p : ι → α) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) : t.sup' H p ∈ s :=
sup'_induction H p w h
#align finset.sup'_mem Finset.sup'_mem
@[congr]
theorem sup'_congr {t : Finset β} {f g : β → α} (h₁ : s = t) (h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) :
s.sup' H f = t.sup' (h₁ ▸ H) g := by
subst s
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [sup'_le_iff, h₂]
#align finset.sup'_congr Finset.sup'_congr
theorem comp_sup'_eq_sup'_comp [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Finset β} (H : s.Nonempty) {f : β → α}
(g : α → γ) (g_sup : ∀ x y, g (x ⊔ y) = g x ⊔ g y) : g (s.sup' H f) = s.sup' H (g ∘ f) := by
refine H.cons_induction ?_ ?_ <;> intros <;> simp [*]
#align finset.comp_sup'_eq_sup'_comp Finset.comp_sup'_eq_sup'_comp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.map_finset_sup' [SemilatticeSup β] [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β]
(f : F) {s : Finset ι} (hs) (g : ι → α) :
f (s.sup' hs g) = s.sup' hs (f ∘ g) := by
refine hs.cons_induction ?_ ?_ <;> intros <;> simp [*]
#align map_finset_sup' map_finset_sup'
lemma nsmul_sup' [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid β] {s : Finset α}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (f : α → β) (n : ℕ) :
s.sup' hs (fun a => n • f a) = n • s.sup' hs f :=
let ns : SupHom β β := { toFun := (n • ·), map_sup' := fun _ _ => (nsmul_right_mono n).map_max }
(map_finset_sup' ns hs _).symm
/-- To rewrite from right to left, use `Finset.sup'_comp_eq_image`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sup'_image [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset γ} {f : γ → β} (hs : (s.image f).Nonempty)
(g : β → α) :
(s.image f).sup' hs g = s.sup' hs.of_image (g ∘ f) := by
rw [← WithBot.coe_eq_coe]; simp only [coe_sup', sup_image, WithBot.coe_sup]; rfl
#align finset.sup'_image Finset.sup'_image
/-- A version of `Finset.sup'_image` with LHS and RHS reversed.
Also, this lemma assumes that `s` is nonempty instead of assuming that its image is nonempty. -/
lemma sup'_comp_eq_image [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset γ} {f : γ → β} (hs : s.Nonempty) (g : β → α) :
s.sup' hs (g ∘ f) = (s.image f).sup' (hs.image f) g :=
.symm <| sup'_image _ _
/-- To rewrite from right to left, use `Finset.sup'_comp_eq_map`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sup'_map {s : Finset γ} {f : γ ↪ β} (g : β → α) (hs : (s.map f).Nonempty) :
(s.map f).sup' hs g = s.sup' (map_nonempty.1 hs) (g ∘ f) := by
rw [← WithBot.coe_eq_coe, coe_sup', sup_map, coe_sup']
rfl
#align finset.sup'_map Finset.sup'_map
/-- A version of `Finset.sup'_map` with LHS and RHS reversed.
Also, this lemma assumes that `s` is nonempty instead of assuming that its image is nonempty. -/
lemma sup'_comp_eq_map {s : Finset γ} {f : γ ↪ β} (g : β → α) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.sup' hs (g ∘ f) = (s.map f).sup' (map_nonempty.2 hs) g :=
.symm <| sup'_map _ _
theorem sup'_mono {s₁ s₂ : Finset β} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₁ : s₁.Nonempty):
s₁.sup' h₁ f ≤ s₂.sup' (h₁.mono h) f :=
Finset.sup'_le h₁ _ (fun _ hb => le_sup' _ (h hb))
/-- A version of `Finset.sup'_mono` acceptable for `@[gcongr]`.
Instead of deducing `s₂.Nonempty` from `s₁.Nonempty` and `s₁ ⊆ s₂`,
this version takes it as an argument. -/
@[gcongr]
lemma _root_.GCongr.finset_sup'_le {s₁ s₂ : Finset β} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
{h₁ : s₁.Nonempty} {h₂ : s₂.Nonempty} : s₁.sup' h₁ f ≤ s₂.sup' h₂ f :=
sup'_mono f h h₁
end Sup'
section Inf'
variable [SemilatticeInf α]
theorem inf_of_mem {s : Finset β} (f : β → α) {b : β} (h : b ∈ s) :
∃ a : α, s.inf ((↑) ∘ f : β → WithTop α) = ↑a :=
@sup_of_mem αᵒᵈ _ _ _ f _ h
#align finset.inf_of_mem Finset.inf_of_mem
/-- Given nonempty finset `s` then `s.inf' H f` is the infimum of its image under `f` in (possibly
unbounded) meet-semilattice `α`, where `H` is a proof of nonemptiness. If `α` has a top element you
may instead use `Finset.inf` which does not require `s` nonempty. -/
def inf' (s : Finset β) (H : s.Nonempty) (f : β → α) : α :=
WithTop.untop (s.inf ((↑) ∘ f)) (by simpa using H)
#align finset.inf' Finset.inf'
variable {s : Finset β} (H : s.Nonempty) (f : β → α)
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf' : ((s.inf' H f : α) : WithTop α) = s.inf ((↑) ∘ f) :=
@coe_sup' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ H f
#align finset.coe_inf' Finset.coe_inf'
@[simp]
theorem inf'_cons {b : β} {hb : b ∉ s} :
(cons b s hb).inf' (nonempty_cons hb) f = f b ⊓ s.inf' H f :=
@sup'_cons αᵒᵈ _ _ _ H f _ _
#align finset.inf'_cons Finset.inf'_cons
@[simp]
theorem inf'_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s).inf' (insert_nonempty _ _) f = f b ⊓ s.inf' H f :=
@sup'_insert αᵒᵈ _ _ _ H f _ _
#align finset.inf'_insert Finset.inf'_insert
@[simp]
theorem inf'_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).inf' (singleton_nonempty _) f = f b :=
rfl
#align finset.inf'_singleton Finset.inf'_singleton
@[simp]
theorem le_inf'_iff {a : α} : a ≤ s.inf' H f ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ f b :=
sup'_le_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) H f
#align finset.le_inf'_iff Finset.le_inf'_iff
theorem le_inf' {a : α} (hs : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ f b) : a ≤ s.inf' H f :=
sup'_le (α := αᵒᵈ) H f hs
#align finset.le_inf' Finset.le_inf'
theorem inf'_le {b : β} (h : b ∈ s) : s.inf' ⟨b, h⟩ f ≤ f b :=
le_sup' (α := αᵒᵈ) f h
#align finset.inf'_le Finset.inf'_le
theorem inf'_le_of_le {a : α} {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) (h : f b ≤ a) :
s.inf' ⟨b, hb⟩ f ≤ a := (inf'_le _ hb).trans h
#align finset.inf'_le_of_le Finset.inf'_le_of_le
@[simp]
theorem inf'_const (a : α) : (s.inf' H fun _ => a) = a :=
sup'_const (α := αᵒᵈ) H a
#align finset.inf'_const Finset.inf'_const
theorem inf'_union [DecidableEq β] {s₁ s₂ : Finset β} (h₁ : s₁.Nonempty) (h₂ : s₂.Nonempty)
(f : β → α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).inf' (h₁.mono subset_union_left) f = s₁.inf' h₁ f ⊓ s₂.inf' h₂ f :=
@sup'_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _
#align finset.inf'_union Finset.inf'_union
theorem inf'_biUnion [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset γ} (Hs : s.Nonempty) {t : γ → Finset β}
(Ht : ∀ b, (t b).Nonempty) :
(s.biUnion t).inf' (Hs.biUnion fun b _ => Ht b) f = s.inf' Hs (fun b => (t b).inf' (Ht b) f) :=
sup'_biUnion (α := αᵒᵈ) _ Hs Ht
#align finset.inf'_bUnion Finset.inf'_biUnion
protected theorem inf'_comm {t : Finset γ} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : β → γ → α) :
(s.inf' hs fun b => t.inf' ht (f b)) = t.inf' ht fun c => s.inf' hs fun b => f b c :=
@Finset.sup'_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ hs ht _
#align finset.inf'_comm Finset.inf'_comm
theorem inf'_product_left {t : Finset γ} (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).inf' h f = s.inf' h.fst fun i => t.inf' h.snd fun i' => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
sup'_product_left (α := αᵒᵈ) h f
#align finset.inf'_product_left Finset.inf'_product_left
theorem inf'_product_right {t : Finset γ} (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).inf' h f = t.inf' h.snd fun i' => s.inf' h.fst fun i => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
sup'_product_right (α := αᵒᵈ) h f
#align finset.inf'_product_right Finset.inf'_product_right
section Prod
variable {ι κ α β : Type*} [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ}
/-- See also `Finset.inf'_prodMap`. -/
lemma prodMk_inf'_inf' (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
(inf' s hs f, inf' t ht g) = inf' (s ×ˢ t) (hs.product ht) (Prod.map f g) :=
prodMk_sup'_sup' (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) hs ht _ _
/-- See also `Finset.prodMk_inf'_inf'`. -/
-- @[simp] -- TODO: Why does `Prod.map_apply` simplify the LHS?
lemma inf'_prodMap (hst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
inf' (s ×ˢ t) hst (Prod.map f g) = (inf' s hst.fst f, inf' t hst.snd g) :=
(prodMk_inf'_inf' _ _ _ _).symm
end Prod
theorem comp_inf'_eq_inf'_comp [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Finset β} (H : s.Nonempty) {f : β → α}
(g : α → γ) (g_inf : ∀ x y, g (x ⊓ y) = g x ⊓ g y) : g (s.inf' H f) = s.inf' H (g ∘ f) :=
comp_sup'_eq_sup'_comp (α := αᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) H g g_inf
#align finset.comp_inf'_eq_inf'_comp Finset.comp_inf'_eq_inf'_comp
theorem inf'_induction {p : α → Prop} (hp : ∀ a₁, p a₁ → ∀ a₂, p a₂ → p (a₁ ⊓ a₂))
(hs : ∀ b ∈ s, p (f b)) : p (s.inf' H f) :=
sup'_induction (α := αᵒᵈ) H f hp hs
#align finset.inf'_induction Finset.inf'_induction
theorem inf'_mem (s : Set α) (w : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ⊓ y ∈ s) {ι : Type*}
(t : Finset ι) (H : t.Nonempty) (p : ι → α) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) : t.inf' H p ∈ s :=
inf'_induction H p w h
#align finset.inf'_mem Finset.inf'_mem
@[congr]
theorem inf'_congr {t : Finset β} {f g : β → α} (h₁ : s = t) (h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) :
s.inf' H f = t.inf' (h₁ ▸ H) g :=
sup'_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) H h₁ h₂
#align finset.inf'_congr Finset.inf'_congr
@[simp]
theorem _root_.map_finset_inf' [SemilatticeInf β] [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β]
(f : F) {s : Finset ι} (hs) (g : ι → α) :
f (s.inf' hs g) = s.inf' hs (f ∘ g) := by
refine hs.cons_induction ?_ ?_ <;> intros <;> simp [*]
#align map_finset_inf' map_finset_inf'
lemma nsmul_inf' [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid β] {s : Finset α}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (f : α → β) (n : ℕ) :
s.inf' hs (fun a => n • f a) = n • s.inf' hs f :=
let ns : InfHom β β := { toFun := (n • ·), map_inf' := fun _ _ => (nsmul_right_mono n).map_min }
(map_finset_inf' ns hs _).symm
/-- To rewrite from right to left, use `Finset.inf'_comp_eq_image`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inf'_image [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset γ} {f : γ → β} (hs : (s.image f).Nonempty)
(g : β → α) :
(s.image f).inf' hs g = s.inf' hs.of_image (g ∘ f) :=
@sup'_image αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ hs _
#align finset.inf'_image Finset.inf'_image
/-- A version of `Finset.inf'_image` with LHS and RHS reversed.
Also, this lemma assumes that `s` is nonempty instead of assuming that its image is nonempty. -/
lemma inf'_comp_eq_image [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset γ} {f : γ → β} (hs : s.Nonempty) (g : β → α) :
s.inf' hs (g ∘ f) = (s.image f).inf' (hs.image f) g :=
sup'_comp_eq_image (α := αᵒᵈ) hs g
/-- To rewrite from right to left, use `Finset.inf'_comp_eq_map`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inf'_map {s : Finset γ} {f : γ ↪ β} (g : β → α) (hs : (s.map f).Nonempty) :
(s.map f).inf' hs g = s.inf' (map_nonempty.1 hs) (g ∘ f) :=
sup'_map (α := αᵒᵈ) _ hs
#align finset.inf'_map Finset.inf'_map
/-- A version of `Finset.inf'_map` with LHS and RHS reversed.
Also, this lemma assumes that `s` is nonempty instead of assuming that its image is nonempty. -/
lemma inf'_comp_eq_map {s : Finset γ} {f : γ ↪ β} (g : β → α) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.inf' hs (g ∘ f) = (s.map f).inf' (map_nonempty.2 hs) g :=
sup'_comp_eq_map (α := αᵒᵈ) g hs
theorem inf'_mono {s₁ s₂ : Finset β} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₁ : s₁.Nonempty) :
s₂.inf' (h₁.mono h) f ≤ s₁.inf' h₁ f :=
Finset.le_inf' h₁ _ (fun _ hb => inf'_le _ (h hb))
/-- A version of `Finset.inf'_mono` acceptable for `@[gcongr]`.
Instead of deducing `s₂.Nonempty` from `s₁.Nonempty` and `s₁ ⊆ s₂`,
this version takes it as an argument. -/
@[gcongr]
lemma _root_.GCongr.finset_inf'_mono {s₁ s₂ : Finset β} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
{h₁ : s₁.Nonempty} {h₂ : s₂.Nonempty} : s₂.inf' h₂ f ≤ s₁.inf' h₁ f :=
inf'_mono f h h₁
end Inf'
section Sup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α]
theorem sup'_eq_sup {s : Finset β} (H : s.Nonempty) (f : β → α) : s.sup' H f = s.sup f :=
le_antisymm (sup'_le H f fun _ => le_sup) (Finset.sup_le fun _ => le_sup' f)
#align finset.sup'_eq_sup Finset.sup'_eq_sup
theorem coe_sup_of_nonempty {s : Finset β} (h : s.Nonempty) (f : β → α) :
(↑(s.sup f) : WithBot α) = s.sup ((↑) ∘ f) := by simp only [← sup'_eq_sup h, coe_sup' h]
#align finset.coe_sup_of_nonempty Finset.coe_sup_of_nonempty
end Sup
section Inf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α]
theorem inf'_eq_inf {s : Finset β} (H : s.Nonempty) (f : β → α) : s.inf' H f = s.inf f :=
sup'_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ) H f
#align finset.inf'_eq_inf Finset.inf'_eq_inf
theorem coe_inf_of_nonempty {s : Finset β} (h : s.Nonempty) (f : β → α) :
(↑(s.inf f) : WithTop α) = s.inf ((↑) ∘ f) :=
coe_sup_of_nonempty (α := αᵒᵈ) h f
#align finset.coe_inf_of_nonempty Finset.coe_inf_of_nonempty
end Inf
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_apply {C : β → Type*} [∀ b : β, SemilatticeSup (C b)]
[∀ b : β, OrderBot (C b)] (s : Finset α) (f : α → ∀ b : β, C b) (b : β) :
s.sup f b = s.sup fun a => f a b :=
comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (fun x : ∀ b : β, C b => x b) (fun _ _ => rfl) rfl
#align finset.sup_apply Finset.sup_apply
@[simp]
protected theorem inf_apply {C : β → Type*} [∀ b : β, SemilatticeInf (C b)]
[∀ b : β, OrderTop (C b)] (s : Finset α) (f : α → ∀ b : β, C b) (b : β) :
s.inf f b = s.inf fun a => f a b :=
Finset.sup_apply (C := fun b => (C b)ᵒᵈ) s f b
#align finset.inf_apply Finset.inf_apply
@[simp]
protected theorem sup'_apply {C : β → Type*} [∀ b : β, SemilatticeSup (C b)]
{s : Finset α} (H : s.Nonempty) (f : α → ∀ b : β, C b) (b : β) :
s.sup' H f b = s.sup' H fun a => f a b :=
comp_sup'_eq_sup'_comp H (fun x : ∀ b : β, C b => x b) fun _ _ => rfl
#align finset.sup'_apply Finset.sup'_apply
@[simp]
protected theorem inf'_apply {C : β → Type*} [∀ b : β, SemilatticeInf (C b)]
{s : Finset α} (H : s.Nonempty) (f : α → ∀ b : β, C b) (b : β) :
s.inf' H f b = s.inf' H fun a => f a b :=
Finset.sup'_apply (C := fun b => (C b)ᵒᵈ) H f b
#align finset.inf'_apply Finset.inf'_apply
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sup' [SemilatticeSup α] {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) :
toDual (s.sup' hs f) = s.inf' hs (toDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.to_dual_sup' Finset.toDual_sup'
@[simp]
theorem toDual_inf' [SemilatticeInf α] {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) :
toDual (s.inf' hs f) = s.sup' hs (toDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.to_dual_inf' Finset.toDual_inf'
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sup' [SemilatticeInf α] {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → αᵒᵈ) :
ofDual (s.sup' hs f) = s.inf' hs (ofDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.of_dual_sup' Finset.ofDual_sup'
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_inf' [SemilatticeSup α] {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → αᵒᵈ) :
ofDual (s.inf' hs f) = s.sup' hs (ofDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.of_dual_inf' Finset.ofDual_inf'
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
{f : ι → α} {g : κ → α} {a : α}
theorem sup'_inf_distrib_left (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
a ⊓ s.sup' hs f = s.sup' hs fun i ↦ a ⊓ f i := by
induction hs using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih => simp_rw [sup'_cons hs, inf_sup_left, ih]
#align finset.sup'_inf_distrib_left Finset.sup'_inf_distrib_left
theorem sup'_inf_distrib_right (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
s.sup' hs f ⊓ a = s.sup' hs fun i => f i ⊓ a := by
rw [inf_comm, sup'_inf_distrib_left]; simp_rw [inf_comm]
#align finset.sup'_inf_distrib_right Finset.sup'_inf_distrib_right
theorem sup'_inf_sup' (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α) :
s.sup' hs f ⊓ t.sup' ht g = (s ×ˢ t).sup' (hs.product ht) fun i => f i.1 ⊓ g i.2 := by
simp_rw [Finset.sup'_inf_distrib_right, Finset.sup'_inf_distrib_left, sup'_product_left]
#align finset.sup'_inf_sup' Finset.sup'_inf_sup'
theorem inf'_sup_distrib_left (f : ι → α) (a : α) : a ⊔ s.inf' hs f = s.inf' hs fun i => a ⊔ f i :=
@sup'_inf_distrib_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ hs _ _
#align finset.inf'_sup_distrib_left Finset.inf'_sup_distrib_left
theorem inf'_sup_distrib_right (f : ι → α) (a : α) : s.inf' hs f ⊔ a = s.inf' hs fun i => f i ⊔ a :=
@sup'_inf_distrib_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ hs _ _
#align finset.inf'_sup_distrib_right Finset.inf'_sup_distrib_right
theorem inf'_sup_inf' (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α) :
s.inf' hs f ⊔ t.inf' ht g = (s ×ˢ t).inf' (hs.product ht) fun i => f i.1 ⊔ g i.2 :=
@sup'_inf_sup' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ hs ht _ _
#align finset.inf'_sup_inf' Finset.inf'_sup_inf'
end DistribLattice
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s : Finset ι} (H : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_sup'_iff : a ≤ s.sup' H f ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ f b := by
rw [← WithBot.coe_le_coe, coe_sup', Finset.le_sup_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe a)]
exact exists_congr (fun _ => and_congr_right' WithBot.coe_le_coe)
#align finset.le_sup'_iff Finset.le_sup'_iff
@[simp]
theorem lt_sup'_iff : a < s.sup' H f ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < f b := by
rw [← WithBot.coe_lt_coe, coe_sup', Finset.lt_sup_iff]
exact exists_congr (fun _ => and_congr_right' WithBot.coe_lt_coe)
#align finset.lt_sup'_iff Finset.lt_sup'_iff
@[simp]
theorem sup'_lt_iff : s.sup' H f < a ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, f i < a := by
rw [← WithBot.coe_lt_coe, coe_sup', Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe a)]
exact forall₂_congr (fun _ _ => WithBot.coe_lt_coe)
#align finset.sup'_lt_iff Finset.sup'_lt_iff
@[simp]
theorem inf'_le_iff : s.inf' H f ≤ a ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ a :=
le_sup'_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) H
#align finset.inf'_le_iff Finset.inf'_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem inf'_lt_iff : s.inf' H f < a ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i < a :=
lt_sup'_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) H
#align finset.inf'_lt_iff Finset.inf'_lt_iff
@[simp]
theorem lt_inf'_iff : a < s.inf' H f ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, a < f i :=
sup'_lt_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) H
#align finset.lt_inf'_iff Finset.lt_inf'_iff
theorem exists_mem_eq_sup' (f : ι → α) : ∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ s.sup' H f = f i := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton c => exact ⟨c, mem_singleton_self c, rfl⟩
| cons c s hcs hs ih =>
rcases ih with ⟨b, hb, h'⟩
rw [sup'_cons hs, h']
cases le_total (f b) (f c) with
| inl h => exact ⟨c, mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl), sup_eq_left.2 h⟩
| inr h => exact ⟨b, mem_cons.2 (Or.inr hb), sup_eq_right.2 h⟩
#align finset.exists_mem_eq_sup' Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup'
theorem exists_mem_eq_inf' (f : ι → α) : ∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ s.inf' H f = f i :=
exists_mem_eq_sup' (α := αᵒᵈ) H f
#align finset.exists_mem_eq_inf' Finset.exists_mem_eq_inf'
theorem exists_mem_eq_sup [OrderBot α] (s : Finset ι) (h : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) :
∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ s.sup f = f i :=
sup'_eq_sup h f ▸ exists_mem_eq_sup' h f
#align finset.exists_mem_eq_sup Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup
theorem exists_mem_eq_inf [OrderTop α] (s : Finset ι) (h : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) :
∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ s.inf f = f i :=
exists_mem_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ) s h f
#align finset.exists_mem_eq_inf Finset.exists_mem_eq_inf
end LinearOrder
/-! ### max and min of finite sets -/
section MaxMin
variable [LinearOrder α]
/-- Let `s` be a finset in a linear order. Then `s.max` is the maximum of `s` if `s` is not empty,
and `⊥` otherwise. It belongs to `WithBot α`. If you want to get an element of `α`, see
`s.max'`. -/
protected def max (s : Finset α) : WithBot α :=
sup s (↑)
#align finset.max Finset.max
theorem max_eq_sup_coe {s : Finset α} : s.max = s.sup (↑) :=
rfl
#align finset.max_eq_sup_coe Finset.max_eq_sup_coe
theorem max_eq_sup_withBot (s : Finset α) : s.max = sup s (↑) :=
rfl
#align finset.max_eq_sup_with_bot Finset.max_eq_sup_withBot
@[simp]
theorem max_empty : (∅ : Finset α).max = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align finset.max_empty Finset.max_empty
@[simp]
theorem max_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} : (insert a s).max = max ↑a s.max :=
fold_insert_idem
#align finset.max_insert Finset.max_insert
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Lattice.lean | 1,374 | 1,376 | theorem max_singleton {a : α} : Finset.max {a} = (a : WithBot α) := by |
rw [← insert_emptyc_eq]
exact max_insert
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
#align real.angle.sin_coe_pi Real.Angle.sin_coe_pi
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
#align real.angle.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
#align real.angle.sin_neg Real.Angle.sin_neg
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.sin_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sin_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi Real.Angle.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
#align real.angle.cos_zero Real.Angle.cos_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
#align real.angle.cos_coe_pi Real.Angle.cos_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
#align real.angle.cos_neg Real.Angle.cos_neg
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.cos_antiperiodic Real.Angle.cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi Real.Angle.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
#align real.angle.sin_add Real.Angle.sin_add
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
#align real.angle.cos_add Real.Angle.cos_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
#align real.angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Real.Angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ico_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ioc_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIocMod
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
#align real.angle.to_real Real.Angle.toReal
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe Real.Angle.toReal_coe
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
#align real.angle.to_real_injective Real.Angle.toReal_injective
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
#align real.angle.to_real_inj Real.Angle.toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
#align real.angle.coe_to_real Real.Angle.coe_toReal
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
#align real.angle.neg_pi_lt_to_real Real.Angle.neg_pi_lt_toReal
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
#align real.angle.to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.toReal_le_pi
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.abs_toReal_le_pi
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
#align real.angle.to_Ioc_mod_to_real Real.Angle.toIocMod_toReal
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_zero Real.Angle.toReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_pi Real.Angle.toReal_pi
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_pi_iff
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
#align real.angle.pi_ne_zero Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.angle.to_real_pi_div_two Real.Angle.toReal_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.angle.to_real_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.toReal_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_neg_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_eq_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff' h',
le_div_iff' h']
#align real.angle.nsmul_to_real_eq_mul Real.Angle.nsmul_toReal_eq_mul
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul Real.Angle.two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;>
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 708 | 710 | theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by |
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exponential
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ccf84e0d918668460a34aa19d02fe2e0e2286da0"
/-!
# Trigonometric functions as sums of infinite series
In this file we express trigonometric functions in terms of their series expansion.
## Main results
* `Complex.hasSum_cos`, `Complex.cos_eq_tsum`: `Complex.cos` as the sum of an infinite series.
* `Real.hasSum_cos`, `Real.cos_eq_tsum`: `Real.cos` as the sum of an infinite series.
* `Complex.hasSum_sin`, `Complex.sin_eq_tsum`: `Complex.sin` as the sum of an infinite series.
* `Real.hasSum_sin`, `Real.sin_eq_tsum`: `Real.sin` as the sum of an infinite series.
-/
open NormedSpace
open scoped Nat
/-! ### `cos` and `sin` for `ℝ` and `ℂ` -/
section SinCos
theorem Complex.hasSum_cos' (z : ℂ) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => (z * Complex.I) ^ (2 * n) / ↑(2 * n)!) (Complex.cos z) := by
rw [Complex.cos, Complex.exp_eq_exp_ℂ]
have := ((expSeries_div_hasSum_exp ℂ (z * Complex.I)).add
(expSeries_div_hasSum_exp ℂ (-z * Complex.I))).div_const 2
replace := (Nat.divModEquiv 2).symm.hasSum_iff.mpr this
dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp_rw [← mul_comm 2 _] at this
refine this.prod_fiberwise fun k => ?_
dsimp only
convert hasSum_fintype (_ : Fin 2 → ℂ) using 1
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp_rw [Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one, add_zero, pow_succ, pow_mul, mul_pow, neg_sq, ← two_mul,
neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_div, add_right_neg, zero_div, add_zero,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℂ) ≠ 0)]
#align complex.has_sum_cos' Complex.hasSum_cos'
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Series.lean | 49 | 64 | theorem Complex.hasSum_sin' (z : ℂ) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => (z * Complex.I) ^ (2 * n + 1) / ↑(2 * n + 1)! / Complex.I)
(Complex.sin z) := by |
rw [Complex.sin, Complex.exp_eq_exp_ℂ]
have := (((expSeries_div_hasSum_exp ℂ (-z * Complex.I)).sub
(expSeries_div_hasSum_exp ℂ (z * Complex.I))).mul_right Complex.I).div_const 2
replace := (Nat.divModEquiv 2).symm.hasSum_iff.mpr this
dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp_rw [← mul_comm 2 _] at this
refine this.prod_fiberwise fun k => ?_
dsimp only
convert hasSum_fintype (_ : Fin 2 → ℂ) using 1
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp_rw [Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one, add_zero, pow_succ, pow_mul, mul_pow, neg_sq, sub_self,
zero_mul, zero_div, zero_add, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_div, ← neg_add', ← two_mul,
neg_mul, neg_div, mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℂ) ≠ 0), Complex.div_I]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Blyth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Blyth
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Projectivization.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.projective_space.independence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1e82f5ec4645f6a92bb9e02fce51e44e3bc3e1fe"
/-!
# Independence in Projective Space
In this file we define independence and dependence of families of elements in projective space.
## Implementation Details
We use an inductive definition to define the independence of points in projective
space, where the only constructor assumes an independent family of vectors from the
ambient vector space. Similarly for the definition of dependence.
## Results
- A family of elements is dependent if and only if it is not independent.
- Two elements are dependent if and only if they are equal.
# Future Work
- Define collinearity in projective space.
- Prove the axioms of a projective geometry are satisfied by the dependence relation.
- Define projective linear subspaces.
-/
open scoped LinearAlgebra.Projectivization
variable {ι K V : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] {f : ι → ℙ K V}
namespace Projectivization
/-- A linearly independent family of nonzero vectors gives an independent family of points
in projective space. -/
inductive Independent : (ι → ℙ K V) → Prop
| mk (f : ι → V) (hf : ∀ i : ι, f i ≠ 0) (hl : LinearIndependent K f) :
Independent fun i => mk K (f i) (hf i)
#align projectivization.independent Projectivization.Independent
/-- A family of points in a projective space is independent if and only if the representative
vectors determined by the family are linearly independent. -/
theorem independent_iff : Independent f ↔ LinearIndependent K (Projectivization.rep ∘ f) := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨ff, hff, hh⟩
choose a ha using fun i : ι => exists_smul_eq_mk_rep K (ff i) (hff i)
convert hh.units_smul a
ext i
exact (ha i).symm
· convert Independent.mk _ _ h
· simp only [mk_rep, Function.comp_apply]
· intro i
apply rep_nonzero
#align projectivization.independent_iff Projectivization.independent_iff
/-- A family of points in projective space is independent if and only if the family of
submodules which the points determine is independent in the lattice-theoretic sense. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projectivization/Independence.lean | 63 | 72 | theorem independent_iff_completeLattice_independent :
Independent f ↔ CompleteLattice.Independent fun i => (f i).submodule := by |
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨f, hf, hi⟩
simp only [submodule_mk]
exact (CompleteLattice.independent_iff_linearIndependent_of_ne_zero (R := K) hf).mpr hi
· rw [independent_iff]
refine h.linearIndependent (Projectivization.submodule ∘ f) (fun i => ?_) fun i => ?_
· simpa only [Function.comp_apply, submodule_eq] using Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self _
· exact rep_nonzero (f i)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Inv
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
#align ennreal.to_real_add ENNReal.toReal_add
theorem toReal_sub_of_le {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : b ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
(a - b).toReal = a.toReal - b.toReal := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_le_ne_top ha h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_sub, ENNReal.coe_toReal, NNReal.coe_sub (ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mp h)]
#align ennreal.to_real_sub_of_le ENNReal.toReal_sub_of_le
theorem le_toReal_sub {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal - b.toReal ≤ (a - b).toReal := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
induction a
· simp
· simp only [← coe_sub, NNReal.sub_def, Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_toReal]
exact le_max_left _ _
#align ennreal.le_to_real_sub ENNReal.le_toReal_sub
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, top_toReal, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, top_toReal, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
#align ennreal.to_real_add_le ENNReal.toReal_add_le
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
#align ennreal.of_real_add ENNReal.ofReal_add
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
#align ennreal.of_real_add_le ENNReal.ofReal_add_le
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 76 | 79 | theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by |
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.WithTop
import Mathlib.RingTheory.HahnSeries.Multiplication
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.hahn_series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a484a7d0eade4e1268f4fb402859b6686037f965"
/-!
# Hahn Series
If `Γ` is ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of formal series over `Γ` with
coefficients in `R`, whose supports are partially well-ordered. With further structure on `R` and
`Γ`, we can add further structure on `HahnSeries Γ R`. We introduce valuations and a notion of
summability for possibly infinite families of series.
## Main Definitions
* `HahnSeries.addVal Γ R` defines an `AddValuation` on `HahnSeries Γ R` when `Γ` is linearly
ordered.
* A `HahnSeries.SummableFamily` is a family of Hahn series such that the union of their supports
is well-founded and only finitely many are nonzero at any given coefficient. They have a formal
sum, `HahnSeries.SummableFamily.hsum`, which can be bundled as a `LinearMap` as
`HahnSeries.SummableFamily.lsum`. Note that this is different from `Summable` in the valuation
topology, because there are topologically summable families that do not satisfy the axioms of
`HahnSeries.SummableFamily`, and formally summable families whose sums do not converge
topologically.
## References
- [J. van der Hoeven, *Operators on Generalized Power Series*][van_der_hoeven]
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Finset Function
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise
noncomputable section
variable {Γ : Type*} {R : Type*}
namespace HahnSeries
section Valuation
variable (Γ R) [LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid Γ] [Ring R] [IsDomain R]
/-- The additive valuation on `HahnSeries Γ R`, returning the smallest index at which
a Hahn Series has a nonzero coefficient, or `⊤` for the 0 series. -/
def addVal : AddValuation (HahnSeries Γ R) (WithTop Γ) :=
AddValuation.of (fun x => if x = (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) then (⊤ : WithTop Γ) else x.order)
(if_pos rfl) ((if_neg one_ne_zero).trans (by simp [order_of_ne]))
(fun x y => by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> · simp [hx, hy]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hx, hy]
· simp only [hx, hy, support_nonempty_iff, if_neg, not_false_iff, isWF_support]
by_cases hxy : x + y = 0
· simp [hxy]
rw [if_neg hxy, ← WithTop.coe_min, WithTop.coe_le_coe]
exact min_order_le_order_add hxy)
fun x y => by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
dsimp only
rw [if_neg hx, if_neg hy, if_neg (mul_ne_zero hx hy), ← WithTop.coe_add, WithTop.coe_eq_coe,
order_mul hx hy]
#align hahn_series.add_val HahnSeries.addVal
variable {Γ} {R}
theorem addVal_apply {x : HahnSeries Γ R} :
addVal Γ R x = if x = (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) then (⊤ : WithTop Γ) else x.order :=
AddValuation.of_apply _
#align hahn_series.add_val_apply HahnSeries.addVal_apply
@[simp]
theorem addVal_apply_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) : addVal Γ R x = x.order :=
if_neg hx
#align hahn_series.add_val_apply_of_ne HahnSeries.addVal_apply_of_ne
theorem addVal_le_of_coeff_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) :
addVal Γ R x ≤ g := by
rw [addVal_apply_of_ne (ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero h), WithTop.coe_le_coe]
exact order_le_of_coeff_ne_zero h
#align hahn_series.add_val_le_of_coeff_ne_zero HahnSeries.addVal_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
end Valuation
theorem isPWO_iUnion_support_powers [LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid Γ] [Ring R] [IsDomain R]
{x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : 0 < addVal Γ R x) : (⋃ n : ℕ, (x ^ n).support).IsPWO := by
apply (x.isWF_support.isPWO.addSubmonoid_closure _).mono _
· exact fun g hg => WithTop.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (le_of_lt hx) (addVal_le_of_coeff_ne_zero hg))
refine Set.iUnion_subset fun n => ?_
induction' n with n ih <;> intro g hn
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, pow_zero, support_one, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hn
rw [hn, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact AddSubmonoid.zero_mem _
· obtain ⟨i, hi, j, hj, rfl⟩ := support_mul_subset_add_support hn
exact SetLike.mem_coe.2 (AddSubmonoid.add_mem _ (ih hi) (AddSubmonoid.subset_closure hj))
#align hahn_series.is_pwo_Union_support_powers HahnSeries.isPWO_iUnion_support_powers
section
variable (Γ) (R) [PartialOrder Γ] [AddCommMonoid R]
/-- An infinite family of Hahn series which has a formal coefficient-wise sum.
The requirements for this are that the union of the supports of the series is well-founded,
and that only finitely many series are nonzero at any given coefficient. -/
structure SummableFamily (α : Type*) where
toFun : α → HahnSeries Γ R
isPWO_iUnion_support' : Set.IsPWO (⋃ a : α, (toFun a).support)
finite_co_support' : ∀ g : Γ, { a | (toFun a).coeff g ≠ 0 }.Finite
#align hahn_series.summable_family HahnSeries.SummableFamily
end
namespace SummableFamily
section AddCommMonoid
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [AddCommMonoid R] {α : Type*}
instance : FunLike (SummableFamily Γ R α) α (HahnSeries Γ R) where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem isPWO_iUnion_support (s : SummableFamily Γ R α) : Set.IsPWO (⋃ a : α, (s a).support) :=
s.isPWO_iUnion_support'
#align hahn_series.summable_family.is_pwo_Union_support HahnSeries.SummableFamily.isPWO_iUnion_support
theorem finite_co_support (s : SummableFamily Γ R α) (g : Γ) :
(Function.support fun a => (s a).coeff g).Finite :=
s.finite_co_support' g
#align hahn_series.summable_family.finite_co_support HahnSeries.SummableFamily.finite_co_support
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (SummableFamily Γ R α) (α → HahnSeries Γ R) (⇑) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
#align hahn_series.summable_family.coe_injective HahnSeries.SummableFamily.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : SummableFamily Γ R α} (h : ∀ a : α, s a = t a) : s = t :=
DFunLike.ext s t h
#align hahn_series.summable_family.ext HahnSeries.SummableFamily.ext
instance : Add (SummableFamily Γ R α) :=
⟨fun x y =>
{ toFun := x + y
isPWO_iUnion_support' :=
(x.isPWO_iUnion_support.union y.isPWO_iUnion_support).mono
(by
rw [← Set.iUnion_union_distrib]
exact Set.iUnion_mono fun a => support_add_subset)
finite_co_support' := fun g =>
((x.finite_co_support g).union (y.finite_co_support g)).subset
(by
intro a ha
change (x a).coeff g + (y a).coeff g ≠ 0 at ha
rw [Set.mem_union, Function.mem_support, Function.mem_support]
contrapose! ha
rw [ha.1, ha.2, add_zero]) }⟩
instance : Zero (SummableFamily Γ R α) :=
⟨⟨0, by simp, by simp⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (SummableFamily Γ R α) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_add {s t : SummableFamily Γ R α} : ⇑(s + t) = s + t :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.coe_add HahnSeries.SummableFamily.coe_add
theorem add_apply {s t : SummableFamily Γ R α} {a : α} : (s + t) a = s a + t a :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.add_apply HahnSeries.SummableFamily.add_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : SummableFamily Γ R α) : α → HahnSeries Γ R) = 0 :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.coe_zero HahnSeries.SummableFamily.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : SummableFamily Γ R α) a = 0 :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.zero_apply HahnSeries.SummableFamily.zero_apply
instance : AddCommMonoid (SummableFamily Γ R α) where
zero := 0
nsmul := nsmulRec
zero_add s := by
ext
apply zero_add
add_zero s := by
ext
apply add_zero
add_comm s t := by
ext
apply add_comm
add_assoc r s t := by
ext
apply add_assoc
/-- The infinite sum of a `SummableFamily` of Hahn series. -/
def hsum (s : SummableFamily Γ R α) : HahnSeries Γ R where
coeff g := ∑ᶠ i, (s i).coeff g
isPWO_support' :=
s.isPWO_iUnion_support.mono fun g => by
contrapose
rw [Set.mem_iUnion, not_exists, Function.mem_support, Classical.not_not]
simp_rw [mem_support, Classical.not_not]
intro h
rw [finsum_congr h, finsum_zero]
#align hahn_series.summable_family.hsum HahnSeries.SummableFamily.hsum
@[simp]
theorem hsum_coeff {s : SummableFamily Γ R α} {g : Γ} : s.hsum.coeff g = ∑ᶠ i, (s i).coeff g :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.hsum_coeff HahnSeries.SummableFamily.hsum_coeff
theorem support_hsum_subset {s : SummableFamily Γ R α} : s.hsum.support ⊆ ⋃ a : α, (s a).support :=
fun g hg => by
rw [mem_support, hsum_coeff, finsum_eq_sum _ (s.finite_co_support _)] at hg
obtain ⟨a, _, h2⟩ := exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hg
rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
exact ⟨a, h2⟩
#align hahn_series.summable_family.support_hsum_subset HahnSeries.SummableFamily.support_hsum_subset
@[simp]
theorem hsum_add {s t : SummableFamily Γ R α} : (s + t).hsum = s.hsum + t.hsum := by
ext g
simp only [hsum_coeff, add_coeff, add_apply]
exact finsum_add_distrib (s.finite_co_support _) (t.finite_co_support _)
#align hahn_series.summable_family.hsum_add HahnSeries.SummableFamily.hsum_add
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [AddCommGroup R] {α : Type*} {s t : SummableFamily Γ R α} {a : α}
instance : Neg (SummableFamily Γ R α) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ toFun := fun a => -s a
isPWO_iUnion_support' := by
simp_rw [support_neg]
exact s.isPWO_iUnion_support
finite_co_support' := fun g => by
simp only [neg_coeff', Pi.neg_apply, Ne, neg_eq_zero]
exact s.finite_co_support g }⟩
instance : AddCommGroup (SummableFamily Γ R α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (SummableFamily Γ R α)) with
zsmul := zsmulRec
add_left_neg := fun a => by
ext
apply add_left_neg }
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg : ⇑(-s) = -s :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.coe_neg HahnSeries.SummableFamily.coe_neg
theorem neg_apply : (-s) a = -s a :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.neg_apply HahnSeries.SummableFamily.neg_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub : ⇑(s - t) = s - t :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.coe_sub HahnSeries.SummableFamily.coe_sub
theorem sub_apply : (s - t) a = s a - t a :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.sub_apply HahnSeries.SummableFamily.sub_apply
end AddCommGroup
section Semiring
variable [OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid Γ] [Semiring R] {α : Type*}
instance : SMul (HahnSeries Γ R) (SummableFamily Γ R α) where
smul x s :=
{ toFun := fun a => x * s a
isPWO_iUnion_support' := by
apply (x.isPWO_support.add s.isPWO_iUnion_support).mono
refine Set.Subset.trans (Set.iUnion_mono fun a => support_mul_subset_add_support) ?_
intro g
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a ha => (Set.add_subset_add (Set.Subset.refl _) (Set.subset_iUnion _ a)) ha
finite_co_support' := fun g => by
apply ((addAntidiagonal x.isPWO_support s.isPWO_iUnion_support g).finite_toSet.biUnion'
fun ij _ => ?_).subset fun a ha => ?_
· exact fun ij _ => Function.support fun a => (s a).coeff ij.2
· apply s.finite_co_support
· obtain ⟨i, hi, j, hj, rfl⟩ := support_mul_subset_add_support ha
simp only [exists_prop, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_addAntidiagonal, mul_coeff, mem_support,
isPWO_support, Prod.exists]
exact ⟨i, j, mem_coe.2 (mem_addAntidiagonal.2 ⟨hi, Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨a, hj⟩, rfl⟩), hj⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {s : SummableFamily Γ R α} {a : α} : (x • s) a = x * s a :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.smul_apply HahnSeries.SummableFamily.smul_apply
instance : Module (HahnSeries Γ R) (SummableFamily Γ R α) where
smul := (· • ·)
smul_zero _ := ext fun _ => mul_zero _
zero_smul _ := ext fun _ => zero_mul _
one_smul _ := ext fun _ => one_mul _
add_smul _ _ _ := ext fun _ => add_mul _ _ _
smul_add _ _ _ := ext fun _ => mul_add _ _ _
mul_smul _ _ _ := ext fun _ => mul_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem hsum_smul {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {s : SummableFamily Γ R α} : (x • s).hsum = x * s.hsum := by
ext g
simp only [mul_coeff, hsum_coeff, smul_apply]
refine
(Eq.trans (finsum_congr fun a => ?_)
(finsum_sum_comm (addAntidiagonal x.isPWO_support s.isPWO_iUnion_support g)
(fun i ij => x.coeff (Prod.fst ij) * (s i).coeff ij.snd) ?_)).trans
?_
· refine sum_subset (addAntidiagonal_mono_right
(Set.subset_iUnion (fun j => support (toFun s j)) a)) ?_
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hU ha
rw [mem_addAntidiagonal] at *
rw [Classical.not_not.1 fun con => ha ⟨hU.1, con, hU.2.2⟩, mul_zero]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ _
refine (s.finite_co_support j).subset ?_
simp_rw [Function.support_subset_iff', Function.mem_support, Classical.not_not]
intro a ha
rw [ha, mul_zero]
· refine (sum_congr rfl ?_).trans (sum_subset (addAntidiagonal_mono_right ?_) ?_).symm
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ _
rw [mul_finsum]
apply s.finite_co_support
· intro x hx
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Ne, mem_support]
contrapose! hx
simp [hx]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hU ha
rw [mem_addAntidiagonal] at *
rw [← hsum_coeff, Classical.not_not.1 fun con => ha ⟨hU.1, con, hU.2.2⟩,
mul_zero]
#align hahn_series.summable_family.hsum_smul HahnSeries.SummableFamily.hsum_smul
/-- The summation of a `summable_family` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lsum : SummableFamily Γ R α →ₗ[HahnSeries Γ R] HahnSeries Γ R where
toFun := hsum
map_add' _ _ := hsum_add
map_smul' _ _ := hsum_smul
#align hahn_series.summable_family.lsum HahnSeries.SummableFamily.lsum
@[simp]
theorem hsum_sub {R : Type*} [Ring R] {s t : SummableFamily Γ R α} :
(s - t).hsum = s.hsum - t.hsum := by
rw [← lsum_apply, LinearMap.map_sub, lsum_apply, lsum_apply]
#align hahn_series.summable_family.hsum_sub HahnSeries.SummableFamily.hsum_sub
end Semiring
section OfFinsupp
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [AddCommMonoid R] {α : Type*}
/-- A family with only finitely many nonzero elements is summable. -/
def ofFinsupp (f : α →₀ HahnSeries Γ R) : SummableFamily Γ R α where
toFun := f
isPWO_iUnion_support' := by
apply (f.support.isPWO_bUnion.2 fun a _ => (f a).isPWO_support).mono
refine Set.iUnion_subset_iff.2 fun a g hg => ?_
have haf : a ∈ f.support := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ← support_nonempty_iff]
exact ⟨g, hg⟩
exact Set.mem_biUnion haf hg
finite_co_support' g := by
refine f.support.finite_toSet.subset fun a ha => ?_
simp only [coeff.addMonoidHom_apply, mem_coe, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne,
Function.mem_support]
contrapose! ha
simp [ha]
#align hahn_series.summable_family.of_finsupp HahnSeries.SummableFamily.ofFinsupp
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofFinsupp {f : α →₀ HahnSeries Γ R} : ⇑(SummableFamily.ofFinsupp f) = f :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.coe_of_finsupp HahnSeries.SummableFamily.coe_ofFinsupp
@[simp]
theorem hsum_ofFinsupp {f : α →₀ HahnSeries Γ R} : (ofFinsupp f).hsum = f.sum fun _ => id := by
ext g
simp only [hsum_coeff, coe_ofFinsupp, Finsupp.sum, Ne]
simp_rw [← coeff.addMonoidHom_apply, id]
rw [map_sum, finsum_eq_sum_of_support_subset]
intro x h
simp only [coeff.addMonoidHom_apply, mem_coe, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne]
contrapose! h
simp [h]
#align hahn_series.summable_family.hsum_of_finsupp HahnSeries.SummableFamily.hsum_ofFinsupp
end OfFinsupp
section EmbDomain
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [AddCommMonoid R] {α β : Type*}
/-- A summable family can be reindexed by an embedding without changing its sum. -/
def embDomain (s : SummableFamily Γ R α) (f : α ↪ β) : SummableFamily Γ R β where
toFun b := if h : b ∈ Set.range f then s (Classical.choose h) else 0
isPWO_iUnion_support' := by
refine s.isPWO_iUnion_support.mono (Set.iUnion_subset fun b g h => ?_)
by_cases hb : b ∈ Set.range f
· dsimp only at h
rw [dif_pos hb] at h
exact Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨Classical.choose hb, h⟩
· simp [-Set.mem_range, dif_neg hb] at h
finite_co_support' g :=
((s.finite_co_support g).image f).subset
(by
intro b h
by_cases hb : b ∈ Set.range f
· simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, dif_pos hb] at h
exact ⟨Classical.choose hb, h, Classical.choose_spec hb⟩
· simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, dif_neg hb, zero_coeff, not_true_eq_false] at h)
#align hahn_series.summable_family.emb_domain HahnSeries.SummableFamily.embDomain
variable (s : SummableFamily Γ R α) (f : α ↪ β) {a : α} {b : β}
theorem embDomain_apply :
s.embDomain f b = if h : b ∈ Set.range f then s (Classical.choose h) else 0 :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.emb_domain_apply HahnSeries.SummableFamily.embDomain_apply
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_image : s.embDomain f (f a) = s a := by
rw [embDomain_apply, dif_pos (Set.mem_range_self a)]
exact congr rfl (f.injective (Classical.choose_spec (Set.mem_range_self a)))
#align hahn_series.summable_family.emb_domain_image HahnSeries.SummableFamily.embDomain_image
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_notin_range (h : b ∉ Set.range f) : s.embDomain f b = 0 := by
rw [embDomain_apply, dif_neg h]
#align hahn_series.summable_family.emb_domain_notin_range HahnSeries.SummableFamily.embDomain_notin_range
@[simp]
theorem hsum_embDomain : (s.embDomain f).hsum = s.hsum := by
ext g
simp only [hsum_coeff, embDomain_apply, apply_dite HahnSeries.coeff, dite_apply, zero_coeff]
exact finsum_emb_domain f fun a => (s a).coeff g
#align hahn_series.summable_family.hsum_emb_domain HahnSeries.SummableFamily.hsum_embDomain
end EmbDomain
section powers
variable [LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid Γ] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
/-- The powers of an element of positive valuation form a summable family. -/
def powers (x : HahnSeries Γ R) (hx : 0 < addVal Γ R x) : SummableFamily Γ R ℕ where
toFun n := x ^ n
isPWO_iUnion_support' := isPWO_iUnion_support_powers hx
finite_co_support' g := by
have hpwo := isPWO_iUnion_support_powers hx
by_cases hg : g ∈ ⋃ n : ℕ, { g | (x ^ n).coeff g ≠ 0 }
swap; · exact Set.finite_empty.subset fun n hn => hg (Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, hn⟩)
apply hpwo.isWF.induction hg
intro y ys hy
refine
((((addAntidiagonal x.isPWO_support hpwo y).finite_toSet.biUnion fun ij hij =>
hy ij.snd ?_ ?_).image
Nat.succ).union
(Set.finite_singleton 0)).subset
?_
· exact (mem_addAntidiagonal.1 (mem_coe.1 hij)).2.1
· obtain ⟨hi, _, rfl⟩ := mem_addAntidiagonal.1 (mem_coe.1 hij)
rw [← zero_add ij.snd, ← add_assoc, add_zero]
exact
add_lt_add_right (WithTop.coe_lt_coe.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hx (addVal_le_of_coeff_ne_zero hi)))
_
· rintro (_ | n) hn
· exact Set.mem_union_right _ (Set.mem_singleton 0)
· obtain ⟨i, hi, j, hj, rfl⟩ := support_mul_subset_add_support hn
refine Set.mem_union_left _ ⟨n, Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨j, i⟩, Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨?_, hi⟩⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [and_true_iff, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_addAntidiagonal, mem_coe, eq_self_iff_true,
Ne, mem_support, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact ⟨hj, ⟨n, hi⟩, add_comm j i⟩
#align hahn_series.summable_family.powers HahnSeries.SummableFamily.powers
variable {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : 0 < addVal Γ R x)
@[simp]
theorem coe_powers : ⇑(powers x hx) = HPow.hPow x :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.summable_family.coe_powers HahnSeries.SummableFamily.coe_powers
| Mathlib/RingTheory/HahnSeries/Summable.lean | 504 | 515 | theorem embDomain_succ_smul_powers :
(x • powers x hx).embDomain ⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩ =
powers x hx - ofFinsupp (Finsupp.single 0 1) := by |
apply SummableFamily.ext
rintro (_ | n)
· rw [embDomain_notin_range, sub_apply, coe_powers, pow_zero, coe_ofFinsupp,
Finsupp.single_eq_same, sub_self]
rw [Set.mem_range, not_exists]
exact Nat.succ_ne_zero
· refine Eq.trans (embDomain_image _ ⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩) ?_
simp only [pow_succ', coe_powers, coe_sub, smul_apply, coe_ofFinsupp, Pi.sub_apply]
rw [Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne n.succ_ne_zero.symm, sub_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
#align_import algebra.order.ring.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"44e29dbcff83ba7114a464d592b8c3743987c1e5"
/-!
# Monotonicity of multiplication by positive elements
This file defines typeclasses to reason about monotonicity of the operations
* `b ↦ a * b`, "left multiplication"
* `a ↦ a * b`, "right multiplication"
We use eight typeclasses to encode the various properties we care about for those two operations.
These typeclasses are meant to be mostly internal to this file, to set up each lemma in the
appropriate generality.
Less granular typeclasses like `OrderedAddCommMonoid`, `LinearOrderedField` should be enough for
most purposes, and the system is set up so that they imply the correct granular typeclasses here.
If those are enough for you, you may stop reading here! Else, beware that what follows is a bit
technical.
## Definitions
In all that follows, `α` is an orders which has a `0` and a multiplication. Note however that we do
not use lawfulness of this action in most of the file. Hence `*` should be considered here as a
mostly arbitrary function `α → α → α`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about left multiplication (`b ↦ a * b`):
* `PosMulMono`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `b₁ ≤ b₂ → a * b₁ ≤ a * b₂`.
* `PosMulStrictMono`: If `a > 0`, then `b₁ < b₂ → a * b₁ < a * b₂`.
* `PosMulReflectLT`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `a * b₁ < a * b₂ → b₁ < b₂`.
* `PosMulReflectLE`: If `a > 0`, then `a * b₁ ≤ a * b₂ → b₁ ≤ b₂`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about right multiplication (`a ↦ a * b`):
* `MulPosMono`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ * b ≤ a₂ * b`.
* `MulPosStrictMono`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ < a₂ → a₁ * b < a₂ * b`.
* `MulPosReflectLT`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ * b < a₂ * b → a₁ < a₂`.
* `MulPosReflectLE`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ * b ≤ a₂ * b → a₁ ≤ a₂`.
## Implications
As `α` gets more and more structure, those typeclasses end up being equivalent. The commonly used
implications are:
* When `α` is a partial order:
* `PosMulStrictMono → PosMulMono`
* `MulPosStrictMono → MulPosMono`
* `PosMulReflectLE → PosMulReflectLT`
* `MulPosReflectLE → MulPosReflectLT`
* When `α` is a linear order:
* `PosMulStrictMono → PosMulReflectLE`
* `MulPosStrictMono → MulPosReflectLE` .
* When the multiplication of `α` is commutative:
* `PosMulMono → MulPosMono`
* `PosMulStrictMono → MulPosStrictMono`
* `PosMulReflectLE → MulPosReflectLE`
* `PosMulReflectLT → MulPosReflectLT`
Further, the bundled non-granular typeclasses imply the granular ones like so:
* `OrderedSemiring → PosMulMono`
* `OrderedSemiring → MulPosMono`
* `StrictOrderedSemiring → PosMulStrictMono`
* `StrictOrderedSemiring → MulPosStrictMono`
All these are registered as instances, which means that in practice you should not worry about these
implications. However, if you encounter a case where you think a statement is true but not covered
by the current implications, please bring it up on Zulip!
## Notation
The following is local notation in this file:
* `α≥0`: `{x : α // 0 ≤ x}`
* `α>0`: `{x : α // 0 < x}`
See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/notation.20for.20positive.20elements
for a discussion about this notation, and whether to enable it globally (note that the notation is
currently global but broken, hence actually only works locally).
-/
variable (α : Type*)
set_option quotPrecheck false in
/-- Local notation for the nonnegative elements of a type `α`. TODO: actually make local. -/
notation "α≥0" => { x : α // 0 ≤ x }
set_option quotPrecheck false in
/-- Local notation for the positive elements of a type `α`. TODO: actually make local. -/
notation "α>0" => { x : α // 0 < x }
section Abbreviations
variable [Mul α] [Zero α] [Preorder α]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `b₁ ≤ b₂ → a * b₁ ≤ a * b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSemiring`. -/
abbrev PosMulMono : Prop :=
CovariantClass α≥0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·)
#align pos_mul_mono PosMulMono
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of multiplication by nonnegative elements on the right,
namely `a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ * b ≤ a₂ * b` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSemiring`. -/
abbrev MulPosMono : Prop :=
CovariantClass α≥0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·)
#align mul_pos_mono MulPosMono
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `b₁ < b₂ → a * b₁ < a * b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`StrictOrderedSemiring`. -/
abbrev PosMulStrictMono : Prop :=
CovariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·)
#align pos_mul_strict_mono PosMulStrictMono
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of multiplication by positive elements on the right,
namely `a₁ < a₂ → a₁ * b < a₂ * b` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`StrictOrderedSemiring`. -/
abbrev MulPosStrictMono : Prop :=
CovariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·)
#align mul_pos_strict_mono MulPosStrictMono
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a * b₁ < a * b₂ → b₁ < b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`LinearOrderedSemiring`. -/
abbrev PosMulReflectLT : Prop :=
ContravariantClass α≥0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·)
#align pos_mul_reflect_lt PosMulReflectLT
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the right, namely `a₁ * b < a₂ * b → a₁ < a₂` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`LinearOrderedSemiring`. -/
abbrev MulPosReflectLT : Prop :=
ContravariantClass α≥0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·)
#align mul_pos_reflect_lt MulPosReflectLT
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a * b₁ ≤ a * b₂ → b₁ ≤ b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`LinearOrderedSemiring`. -/
abbrev PosMulReflectLE : Prop :=
ContravariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·)
#align pos_mul_mono_rev PosMulReflectLE
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of multiplication by positive elements on the right,
namely `a₁ * b ≤ a₂ * b → a₁ ≤ a₂` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`LinearOrderedSemiring`. -/
abbrev MulPosReflectLE : Prop :=
ContravariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·)
#align mul_pos_mono_rev MulPosReflectLE
end Abbreviations
variable {α} {a b c d : α}
section MulZero
variable [Mul α] [Zero α]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
instance PosMulMono.to_covariantClass_pos_mul_le [PosMulMono α] :
CovariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a _ _ bc => @CovariantClass.elim α≥0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·) _ ⟨_, a.2.le⟩ _ _ bc⟩
#align pos_mul_mono.to_covariant_class_pos_mul_le PosMulMono.to_covariantClass_pos_mul_le
instance MulPosMono.to_covariantClass_pos_mul_le [MulPosMono α] :
CovariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a _ _ bc => @CovariantClass.elim α≥0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·) _ ⟨_, a.2.le⟩ _ _ bc⟩
#align mul_pos_mono.to_covariant_class_pos_mul_le MulPosMono.to_covariantClass_pos_mul_le
instance PosMulReflectLT.to_contravariantClass_pos_mul_lt [PosMulReflectLT α] :
ContravariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _ _ bc => @ContravariantClass.elim α≥0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·) _ ⟨_, a.2.le⟩ _ _ bc⟩
#align pos_mul_reflect_lt.to_contravariant_class_pos_mul_lt PosMulReflectLT.to_contravariantClass_pos_mul_lt
instance MulPosReflectLT.to_contravariantClass_pos_mul_lt [MulPosReflectLT α] :
ContravariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _ _ bc => @ContravariantClass.elim α≥0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·) _ ⟨_, a.2.le⟩ _ _ bc⟩
#align mul_pos_reflect_lt.to_contravariant_class_pos_mul_lt MulPosReflectLT.to_contravariantClass_pos_mul_lt
@[gcongr]
theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left [PosMulMono α] (h : b ≤ c) (a0 : 0 ≤ a) : a * b ≤ a * c :=
@CovariantClass.elim α≥0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·) _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _ h
#align mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
@[gcongr]
theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right [MulPosMono α] (h : b ≤ c) (a0 : 0 ≤ a) : b * a ≤ c * a :=
@CovariantClass.elim α≥0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·) _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _ h
#align mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
@[gcongr]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left [PosMulStrictMono α] (bc : b < c) (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c :=
@CovariantClass.elim α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·) _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _ bc
#align mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
@[gcongr]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right [MulPosStrictMono α] (bc : b < c) (a0 : 0 < a) : b * a < c * a :=
@CovariantClass.elim α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·) _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _ bc
#align mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left [PosMulReflectLT α] (h : a * b < a * c) (a0 : 0 ≤ a) : b < c :=
@ContravariantClass.elim α≥0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·) _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _ h
#align lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right [MulPosReflectLT α] (h : b * a < c * a) (a0 : 0 ≤ a) : b < c :=
@ContravariantClass.elim α≥0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·) _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _ h
#align lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left [PosMulReflectLE α] (bc : a * b ≤ a * c) (a0 : 0 < a) : b ≤ c :=
@ContravariantClass.elim α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·) _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _ bc
#align le_of_mul_le_mul_left le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_right [MulPosReflectLE α] (bc : b * a ≤ c * a) (a0 : 0 < a) : b ≤ c :=
@ContravariantClass.elim α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·) _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _ bc
#align le_of_mul_le_mul_right le_of_mul_le_mul_right
alias lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
#align lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_left lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_left
alias lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_right := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right
#align lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_right lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_right
alias le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left
#align le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_left le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_left
alias le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_right := le_of_mul_le_mul_right
#align le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_right le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_lt_mul_left [PosMulStrictMono α] [PosMulReflectLT α] (a0 : 0 < a) :
a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
@rel_iff_cov α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·) _ _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _
#align mul_lt_mul_left mul_lt_mul_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_lt_mul_right [MulPosStrictMono α] [MulPosReflectLT α] (a0 : 0 < a) :
b * a < c * a ↔ b < c :=
@rel_iff_cov α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·) _ _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _
#align mul_lt_mul_right mul_lt_mul_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_le_mul_left [PosMulMono α] [PosMulReflectLE α] (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
@rel_iff_cov α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·) _ _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _
#align mul_le_mul_left mul_le_mul_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_le_mul_right [MulPosMono α] [MulPosReflectLE α] (a0 : 0 < a) : b * a ≤ c * a ↔ b ≤ c :=
@rel_iff_cov α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·) _ _ ⟨a, a0⟩ _ _
#align mul_le_mul_right mul_le_mul_right
alias mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left := mul_le_mul_left
alias mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right := mul_le_mul_right
alias mul_lt_mul_iff_of_pos_left := mul_lt_mul_left
alias mul_lt_mul_iff_of_pos_right := mul_lt_mul_right
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_of_nonneg [PosMulStrictMono α] [MulPosMono α] (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c < d)
(a0 : 0 < a) (d0 : 0 ≤ d) : a * c < b * d :=
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ a0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h₁ d0)
#align mul_lt_mul_of_pos_of_nonneg mul_lt_mul_of_pos_of_nonneg
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_le' [PosMulStrictMono α] [MulPosMono α] (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c < d)
(b0 : 0 < b) (c0 : 0 ≤ c) : a * c < b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h₁ c0).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ b0)
#align mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_le' mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_le'
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_of_pos [PosMulMono α] [MulPosStrictMono α] (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c ≤ d)
(a0 : 0 ≤ a) (d0 : 0 < d) : a * c < b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₂ a0).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h₁ d0)
#align mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_of_pos mul_lt_mul_of_nonneg_of_pos
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt' [PosMulMono α] [MulPosStrictMono α] (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c ≤ d)
(b0 : 0 ≤ b) (c0 : 0 < c) : a * c < b * d :=
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h₁ c0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₂ b0)
#align mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt' mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt'
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_of_pos [PosMulStrictMono α] [MulPosStrictMono α] (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d)
(a0 : 0 < a) (d0 : 0 < d) : a * c < b * d :=
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ a0).trans (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h₁ d0)
#align mul_lt_mul_of_pos_of_pos mul_lt_mul_of_pos_of_pos
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt' [PosMulStrictMono α] [MulPosStrictMono α] (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d)
(b0 : 0 < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : a * c < b * d :=
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h₁ c0).trans (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ b0)
#align mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt' mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt'
theorem mul_lt_of_mul_lt_of_nonneg_left [PosMulMono α] (h : a * b < c) (hdb : d ≤ b) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
a * d < c :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hdb ha).trans_lt h
#align mul_lt_of_mul_lt_of_nonneg_left mul_lt_of_mul_lt_of_nonneg_left
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_mul_of_nonneg_left [PosMulMono α] (h : a < b * c) (hcd : c ≤ d) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a < b * d :=
h.trans_le <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hcd hb
#align lt_mul_of_lt_mul_of_nonneg_left lt_mul_of_lt_mul_of_nonneg_left
theorem mul_lt_of_mul_lt_of_nonneg_right [MulPosMono α] (h : a * b < c) (hda : d ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
d * b < c :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hda hb).trans_lt h
#align mul_lt_of_mul_lt_of_nonneg_right mul_lt_of_mul_lt_of_nonneg_right
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_mul_of_nonneg_right [MulPosMono α] (h : a < b * c) (hbd : b ≤ d) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
a < d * c :=
h.trans_le <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hbd hc
#align lt_mul_of_lt_mul_of_nonneg_right lt_mul_of_lt_mul_of_nonneg_right
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulStrictMono.toPosMulReflectLE [PosMulStrictMono α] :
PosMulReflectLE α :=
⟨(covariant_lt_iff_contravariant_le _ _ _).1 CovariantClass.elim⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosStrictMono.toMulPosReflectLE [MulPosStrictMono α] :
MulPosReflectLE α :=
⟨(covariant_lt_iff_contravariant_le _ _ _).1 CovariantClass.elim⟩
theorem PosMulReflectLE.toPosMulStrictMono [PosMulReflectLE α] : PosMulStrictMono α :=
⟨(covariant_lt_iff_contravariant_le _ _ _).2 ContravariantClass.elim⟩
#align pos_mul_mono_rev.to_pos_mul_strict_mono PosMulReflectLE.toPosMulStrictMono
theorem MulPosReflectLE.toMulPosStrictMono [MulPosReflectLE α] : MulPosStrictMono α :=
⟨(covariant_lt_iff_contravariant_le _ _ _).2 ContravariantClass.elim⟩
#align mul_pos_mono_rev.to_mul_pos_strict_mono MulPosReflectLE.toMulPosStrictMono
theorem posMulStrictMono_iff_posMulReflectLE : PosMulStrictMono α ↔ PosMulReflectLE α :=
⟨@PosMulStrictMono.toPosMulReflectLE _ _ _ _, @PosMulReflectLE.toPosMulStrictMono _ _ _ _⟩
#align pos_mul_strict_mono_iff_pos_mul_mono_rev posMulStrictMono_iff_posMulReflectLE
theorem mulPosStrictMono_iff_mulPosReflectLE : MulPosStrictMono α ↔ MulPosReflectLE α :=
⟨@MulPosStrictMono.toMulPosReflectLE _ _ _ _, @MulPosReflectLE.toMulPosStrictMono _ _ _ _⟩
#align mul_pos_strict_mono_iff_mul_pos_mono_rev mulPosStrictMono_iff_mulPosReflectLE
theorem PosMulReflectLT.toPosMulMono [PosMulReflectLT α] : PosMulMono α :=
⟨(covariant_le_iff_contravariant_lt _ _ _).2 ContravariantClass.elim⟩
#align pos_mul_reflect_lt.to_pos_mul_mono PosMulReflectLT.toPosMulMono
theorem MulPosReflectLT.toMulPosMono [MulPosReflectLT α] : MulPosMono α :=
⟨(covariant_le_iff_contravariant_lt _ _ _).2 ContravariantClass.elim⟩
#align mul_pos_reflect_lt.to_mul_pos_mono MulPosReflectLT.toMulPosMono
theorem PosMulMono.toPosMulReflectLT [PosMulMono α] : PosMulReflectLT α :=
⟨(covariant_le_iff_contravariant_lt _ _ _).1 CovariantClass.elim⟩
#align pos_mul_mono.to_pos_mul_reflect_lt PosMulMono.toPosMulReflectLT
theorem MulPosMono.toMulPosReflectLT [MulPosMono α] : MulPosReflectLT α :=
⟨(covariant_le_iff_contravariant_lt _ _ _).1 CovariantClass.elim⟩
#align mul_pos_mono.to_mul_pos_reflect_lt MulPosMono.toMulPosReflectLT
/- TODO: Currently, only one in four of the above are made instances; we could consider making
both directions of `covariant_le_iff_contravariant_lt` and `covariant_lt_iff_contravariant_le`
instances, then all of the above become redundant instances, but there are performance issues. -/
theorem posMulMono_iff_posMulReflectLT : PosMulMono α ↔ PosMulReflectLT α :=
⟨@PosMulMono.toPosMulReflectLT _ _ _ _, @PosMulReflectLT.toPosMulMono _ _ _ _⟩
#align pos_mul_mono_iff_pos_mul_reflect_lt posMulMono_iff_posMulReflectLT
theorem mulPosMono_iff_mulPosReflectLT : MulPosMono α ↔ MulPosReflectLT α :=
⟨@MulPosMono.toMulPosReflectLT _ _ _ _, @MulPosReflectLT.toMulPosMono _ _ _ _⟩
#align mul_pos_mono_iff_mul_pos_reflect_lt mulPosMono_iff_mulPosReflectLT
end LinearOrder
end MulZero
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- Assumes left covariance. -/
theorem Left.mul_pos [PosMulStrictMono α] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
#align left.mul_pos Left.mul_pos
alias mul_pos := Left.mul_pos
#align mul_pos mul_pos
theorem mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg [PosMulStrictMono α] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a * b < 0 := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
#align mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left [PosMulStrictMono α] [PosMulReflectLT α] (h : 0 < a) :
0 < a * b ↔ 0 < b := by simpa using mul_lt_mul_left (b := 0) h
#align zero_lt_mul_left mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left
/-- Assumes right covariance. -/
theorem Right.mul_pos [MulPosStrictMono α] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [zero_mul] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
#align right.mul_pos Right.mul_pos
theorem mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos [MulPosStrictMono α] (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a * b < 0 := by
simpa only [zero_mul] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
#align mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right [MulPosStrictMono α] [MulPosReflectLT α] (h : 0 < b) :
0 < a * b ↔ 0 < a := by simpa using mul_lt_mul_right (b := 0) h
#align zero_lt_mul_right mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right
/-- Assumes left covariance. -/
theorem Left.mul_nonneg [PosMulMono α] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
#align left.mul_nonneg Left.mul_nonneg
alias mul_nonneg := Left.mul_nonneg
#align mul_nonneg mul_nonneg
theorem mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos [PosMulMono α] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a * b ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
#align mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos
/-- Assumes right covariance. -/
theorem Right.mul_nonneg [MulPosMono α] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a * b := by
simpa only [zero_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
#align right.mul_nonneg Right.mul_nonneg
theorem mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg [MulPosMono α] (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a * b ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [zero_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
#align mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg
theorem pos_of_mul_pos_right [PosMulReflectLT α] (h : 0 < a * b) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 < b :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ((mul_zero a).symm ▸ h : a * 0 < a * b) ha
#align pos_of_mul_pos_right pos_of_mul_pos_right
theorem pos_of_mul_pos_left [MulPosReflectLT α] (h : 0 < a * b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 < a :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ((zero_mul b).symm ▸ h : 0 * b < a * b) hb
#align pos_of_mul_pos_left pos_of_mul_pos_left
theorem pos_iff_pos_of_mul_pos [PosMulReflectLT α] [MulPosReflectLT α] (hab : 0 < a * b) :
0 < a ↔ 0 < b :=
⟨pos_of_mul_pos_right hab ∘ le_of_lt, pos_of_mul_pos_left hab ∘ le_of_lt⟩
#align pos_iff_pos_of_mul_pos pos_iff_pos_of_mul_pos
theorem mul_le_mul_of_le_of_le [PosMulMono α] [MulPosMono α] (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) (a0 : 0 ≤ a)
(d0 : 0 ≤ d) : a * c ≤ b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₂ a0).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h₁ d0
#align mul_le_mul_of_le_of_le mul_le_mul_of_le_of_le
@[gcongr]
theorem mul_le_mul [PosMulMono α] [MulPosMono α] (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) (c0 : 0 ≤ c)
(b0 : 0 ≤ b) : a * c ≤ b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h₁ c0).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₂ b0
#align mul_le_mul mul_le_mul
theorem mul_self_le_mul_self [PosMulMono α] [MulPosMono α] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a * a ≤ b * b :=
mul_le_mul hab hab ha <| ha.trans hab
#align mul_self_le_mul_self mul_self_le_mul_self
theorem mul_le_of_mul_le_of_nonneg_left [PosMulMono α] (h : a * b ≤ c) (hle : d ≤ b)
(a0 : 0 ≤ a) : a * d ≤ c :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hle a0).trans h
#align mul_le_of_mul_le_of_nonneg_left mul_le_of_mul_le_of_nonneg_left
theorem le_mul_of_le_mul_of_nonneg_left [PosMulMono α] (h : a ≤ b * c) (hle : c ≤ d)
(b0 : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b * d :=
h.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hle b0)
#align le_mul_of_le_mul_of_nonneg_left le_mul_of_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
theorem mul_le_of_mul_le_of_nonneg_right [MulPosMono α] (h : a * b ≤ c) (hle : d ≤ a)
(b0 : 0 ≤ b) : d * b ≤ c :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hle b0).trans h
#align mul_le_of_mul_le_of_nonneg_right mul_le_of_mul_le_of_nonneg_right
theorem le_mul_of_le_mul_of_nonneg_right [MulPosMono α] (h : a ≤ b * c) (hle : b ≤ d)
(c0 : 0 ≤ c) : a ≤ d * c :=
h.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hle c0)
#align le_mul_of_le_mul_of_nonneg_right le_mul_of_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
theorem posMulMono_iff_covariant_pos :
PosMulMono α ↔ CovariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨@PosMulMono.to_covariantClass_pos_mul_le _ _ _ _, fun h =>
⟨fun a b c h => by
obtain ha | ha := a.prop.eq_or_lt
· simp [← ha]
· exact @CovariantClass.elim α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· ≤ ·) _ ⟨_, ha⟩ _ _ h ⟩⟩
#align pos_mul_mono_iff_covariant_pos posMulMono_iff_covariant_pos
theorem mulPosMono_iff_covariant_pos :
MulPosMono α ↔ CovariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨@MulPosMono.to_covariantClass_pos_mul_le _ _ _ _, fun h =>
⟨fun a b c h => by
obtain ha | ha := a.prop.eq_or_lt
· simp [← ha]
· exact @CovariantClass.elim α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· ≤ ·) _ ⟨_, ha⟩ _ _ h ⟩⟩
#align mul_pos_mono_iff_covariant_pos mulPosMono_iff_covariant_pos
theorem posMulReflectLT_iff_contravariant_pos :
PosMulReflectLT α ↔ ContravariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·) :=
⟨@PosMulReflectLT.to_contravariantClass_pos_mul_lt _ _ _ _, fun h =>
⟨fun a b c h => by
obtain ha | ha := a.prop.eq_or_lt
· simp [← ha] at h
· exact @ContravariantClass.elim α>0 α (fun x y => x * y) (· < ·) _ ⟨_, ha⟩ _ _ h ⟩⟩
#align pos_mul_reflect_lt_iff_contravariant_pos posMulReflectLT_iff_contravariant_pos
theorem mulPosReflectLT_iff_contravariant_pos :
MulPosReflectLT α ↔ ContravariantClass α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·) :=
⟨@MulPosReflectLT.to_contravariantClass_pos_mul_lt _ _ _ _, fun h =>
⟨fun a b c h => by
obtain ha | ha := a.prop.eq_or_lt
· simp [← ha] at h
· exact @ContravariantClass.elim α>0 α (fun x y => y * x) (· < ·) _ ⟨_, ha⟩ _ _ h ⟩⟩
#align mul_pos_reflect_lt_iff_contravariant_pos mulPosReflectLT_iff_contravariant_pos
-- Porting note: mathlib3 proofs would look like `StrictMono.monotone <| @CovariantClass.elim ..`
-- but implicit argument handling causes that to break
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulStrictMono.toPosMulMono [PosMulStrictMono α] : PosMulMono α :=
posMulMono_iff_covariant_pos.2 (covariantClass_le_of_lt _ _ _)
#align pos_mul_strict_mono.to_pos_mul_mono PosMulStrictMono.toPosMulMono
-- Porting note: mathlib3 proofs would look like `StrictMono.monotone <| @CovariantClass.elim ..`
-- but implicit argument handling causes that to break
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosStrictMono.toMulPosMono [MulPosStrictMono α] : MulPosMono α :=
mulPosMono_iff_covariant_pos.2 (covariantClass_le_of_lt _ _ _)
#align mul_pos_strict_mono.to_mul_pos_mono MulPosStrictMono.toMulPosMono
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLE.toPosMulReflectLT [PosMulReflectLE α] :
PosMulReflectLT α :=
posMulReflectLT_iff_contravariant_pos.2
⟨fun a b c h =>
(le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_left h.le a.2).lt_of_ne <| by
rintro rfl
simp at h⟩
#align pos_mul_mono_rev.to_pos_mul_reflect_lt PosMulReflectLE.toPosMulReflectLT
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLE.toMulPosReflectLT [MulPosReflectLE α] :
MulPosReflectLT α :=
mulPosReflectLT_iff_contravariant_pos.2
⟨fun a b c h =>
(le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_right h.le a.2).lt_of_ne <| by
rintro rfl
simp at h⟩
#align mul_pos_mono_rev.to_mul_pos_reflect_lt MulPosReflectLE.toMulPosReflectLT
theorem mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos [PosMulReflectLE α] (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h => (le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_left h.le a0).antisymm <|
le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_left h.ge a0, congr_arg _⟩
#align mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos
theorem mul_right_cancel_iff_of_pos [MulPosReflectLE α] (b0 : 0 < b) : a * b = c * b ↔ a = c :=
⟨fun h => (le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_right h.le b0).antisymm <|
le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_right h.ge b0, congr_arg (· * b)⟩
#align mul_right_cancel_iff_of_pos mul_right_cancel_iff_of_pos
theorem mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos [PosMulStrictMono α] [MulPosStrictMono α]
(hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) (a0 : 0 < a) (d0 : 0 < d) :
a * c = b * d ↔ a = b ∧ c = d := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, hab, hcd, true_and]
refine ⟨fun hab ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hcd ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
· exact (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hcd a0.le).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right hab d0)
· exact (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hcd a0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hab d0.le)
#align mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos
theorem mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos' [PosMulStrictMono α] [MulPosStrictMono α]
(hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) (b0 : 0 < b) (c0 : 0 < c) :
a * c = b * d ↔ a = b ∧ c = d := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, hab, hcd, true_and]
refine ⟨fun hab ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hcd ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
· exact (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right hab c0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hcd b0.le)
· exact (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hab c0.le).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hcd b0)
#align mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos' mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos'
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_mul_pos [PosMulMono α] [MulPosMono α] (hab : 0 < a * b) :
0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with (ha | rfl | ha)
· refine Or.inr ⟨ha, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (fun hb => ?_) hab⟩
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha.le hb
· rw [zero_mul] at hab
exact hab.false.elim
· refine Or.inl ⟨ha, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (fun hb => ?_) hab⟩
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos ha.le hb
#align pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_mul_pos pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_mul_pos
theorem neg_of_mul_pos_right [PosMulMono α] [MulPosMono α] (h : 0 < a * b) (ha : a ≤ 0) : b < 0 :=
((pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_mul_pos h).resolve_left fun h => h.1.not_le ha).2
#align neg_of_mul_pos_right neg_of_mul_pos_right
theorem neg_of_mul_pos_left [PosMulMono α] [MulPosMono α] (h : 0 < a * b) (ha : b ≤ 0) : a < 0 :=
((pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_mul_pos h).resolve_left fun h => h.2.not_le ha).1
#align neg_of_mul_pos_left neg_of_mul_pos_left
theorem neg_iff_neg_of_mul_pos [PosMulMono α] [MulPosMono α] (hab : 0 < a * b) : a < 0 ↔ b < 0 :=
⟨neg_of_mul_pos_right hab ∘ le_of_lt, neg_of_mul_pos_left hab ∘ le_of_lt⟩
#align neg_iff_neg_of_mul_pos neg_iff_neg_of_mul_pos
theorem Left.neg_of_mul_neg_left [PosMulMono α] (h : a * b < 0) (h1 : 0 ≤ a) : b < 0 :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h2 : b ≥ 0 => (Left.mul_nonneg h1 h2).not_lt h
#align left.neg_of_mul_neg_left Left.neg_of_mul_neg_left
theorem Right.neg_of_mul_neg_left [MulPosMono α] (h : a * b < 0) (h1 : 0 ≤ a) : b < 0 :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h2 : b ≥ 0 => (Right.mul_nonneg h1 h2).not_lt h
#align right.neg_of_mul_neg_left Right.neg_of_mul_neg_left
theorem Left.neg_of_mul_neg_right [PosMulMono α] (h : a * b < 0) (h1 : 0 ≤ b) : a < 0 :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h2 : a ≥ 0 => (Left.mul_nonneg h2 h1).not_lt h
#align left.neg_of_mul_neg_right Left.neg_of_mul_neg_right
theorem Right.neg_of_mul_neg_right [MulPosMono α] (h : a * b < 0) (h1 : 0 ≤ b) : a < 0 :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h2 : a ≥ 0 => (Right.mul_nonneg h2 h1).not_lt h
#align right.neg_of_mul_neg_right Right.neg_of_mul_neg_right
end LinearOrder
end MulZeroClass
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α] [Zero α]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-! Lemmas of the form `a ≤ a * b ↔ 1 ≤ b` and `a * b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1`,
which assume left covariance. -/
@[simp]
lemma le_mul_iff_one_le_right [PosMulMono α] [PosMulReflectLE α] (a0 : 0 < a) : a ≤ a * b ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_le_mul_left a0)
#align le_mul_iff_one_le_right le_mul_iff_one_le_right
@[simp]
theorem lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right [PosMulStrictMono α] [PosMulReflectLT α] (a0 : 0 < a) :
a < a * b ↔ 1 < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_lt_mul_left a0)
#align lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right
@[simp]
lemma mul_le_iff_le_one_right [PosMulMono α] [PosMulReflectLE α] (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_le_mul_left a0)
#align mul_le_iff_le_one_right mul_le_iff_le_one_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right [PosMulStrictMono α] [PosMulReflectLT α] (a0 : 0 < a) :
a * b < a ↔ b < 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_lt_mul_left a0)
#align mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right
/-! Lemmas of the form `a ≤ b * a ↔ 1 ≤ b` and `a * b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ 1`,
which assume right covariance. -/
@[simp]
lemma le_mul_iff_one_le_left [MulPosMono α] [MulPosReflectLE α] (a0 : 0 < a) : a ≤ b * a ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_le_mul_right a0)
#align le_mul_iff_one_le_left le_mul_iff_one_le_left
@[simp]
theorem lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left [MulPosStrictMono α] [MulPosReflectLT α] (a0 : 0 < a) :
a < b * a ↔ 1 < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_lt_mul_right a0)
#align lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left
@[simp]
lemma mul_le_iff_le_one_left [MulPosMono α] [MulPosReflectLE α] (b0 : 0 < b) : a * b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_le_mul_right b0)
#align mul_le_iff_le_one_left mul_le_iff_le_one_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left [MulPosStrictMono α] [MulPosReflectLT α] (b0 : 0 < b) :
a * b < b ↔ a < 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_lt_mul_right b0)
#align mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left
/-! Lemmas of the form `1 ≤ b → a ≤ a * b`.
Variants with `< 0` and `≤ 0` instead of `0 <` and `0 ≤` appear in `Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Defs`
(which imports this file) as they need additional results which are not yet available here. -/
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_left [MulPosMono α] (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ 1) : a * b ≤ b := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h hb
#align mul_le_of_le_one_left mul_le_of_le_one_left
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_left [MulPosMono α] (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : 1 ≤ a) : b ≤ a * b := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h hb
#align le_mul_of_one_le_left le_mul_of_one_le_left
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_right [PosMulMono α] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (h : b ≤ 1) : a * b ≤ a := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h ha
#align mul_le_of_le_one_right mul_le_of_le_one_right
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_right [PosMulMono α] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (h : 1 ≤ b) : a ≤ a * b := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h ha
#align le_mul_of_one_le_right le_mul_of_one_le_right
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_left [MulPosStrictMono α] (hb : 0 < b) (h : a < 1) : a * b < b := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h hb
#align mul_lt_of_lt_one_left mul_lt_of_lt_one_left
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_left [MulPosStrictMono α] (hb : 0 < b) (h : 1 < a) : b < a * b := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h hb
#align lt_mul_of_one_lt_left lt_mul_of_one_lt_left
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/GroupWithZero/Unbundled.lean | 748 | 749 | theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_right [PosMulStrictMono α] (ha : 0 < a) (h : b < 1) : a * b < a := by |
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h ha
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ArithMult
#align_import number_theory.arithmetic_function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Convolution
This file defines arithmetic functions, which are functions from `ℕ` to a specified type that map 0
to 0. In the literature, they are often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. These arithmetic
functions are endowed with a multiplication, given by Dirichlet convolution, and pointwise addition,
to form the Dirichlet ring.
## Main Definitions
* `ArithmeticFunction R` consists of functions `f : ℕ → R` such that `f 0 = 0`.
* An arithmetic function `f` `IsMultiplicative` when `x.coprime y → f (x * y) = f x * f y`.
* The pointwise operations `pmul` and `ppow` differ from the multiplication
and power instances on `ArithmeticFunction R`, which use Dirichlet multiplication.
* `ζ` is the arithmetic function such that `ζ x = 1` for `0 < x`.
* `σ k` is the arithmetic function such that `σ k x = ∑ y ∈ divisors x, y ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `pow k` is the arithmetic function such that `pow k x = x ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `id` is the identity arithmetic function on `ℕ`.
* `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`.
* `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n` counted with multiplicity.
* `μ` is the Möbius function (spelled `moebius` in code).
## Main Results
* Several forms of Möbius inversion:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
* And variants that apply when the equalities only hold on a set `S : Set ℕ` such that
`m ∣ n → n ∈ S → m ∈ S`:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
## Notation
All notation is localized in the namespace `ArithmeticFunction`.
The arithmetic functions `ζ`, `σ`, `ω`, `Ω` and `μ` have Greek letter names.
In addition, there are separate locales `ArithmeticFunction.zeta` for `ζ`,
`ArithmeticFunction.sigma` for `σ`, `ArithmeticFunction.omega` for `ω`,
`ArithmeticFunction.Omega` for `Ω`, and `ArithmeticFunction.Moebius` for `μ`,
to allow for selective access to these notations.
The arithmetic function $$n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$$ is given custom notation
`∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` when applied to `n`.
## Tags
arithmetic functions, dirichlet convolution, divisors
-/
open Finset
open Nat
variable (R : Type*)
/-- An arithmetic function is a function from `ℕ` that maps 0 to 0. In the literature, they are
often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. Multiplication on `ArithmeticFunctions` is by
Dirichlet convolution. -/
def ArithmeticFunction [Zero R] :=
ZeroHom ℕ R
#align nat.arithmetic_function ArithmeticFunction
instance ArithmeticFunction.zero [Zero R] : Zero (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Zero (ZeroHom ℕ R))
instance [Zero R] : Inhabited (ArithmeticFunction R) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZeroHom ℕ R))
variable {R}
namespace ArithmeticFunction
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
-- porting note: used to be `CoeFun`
instance : FunLike (ArithmeticFunction R) ℕ R :=
inferInstanceAs (FunLike (ZeroHom ℕ R) ℕ R)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.toFun = f := rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.to_fun_eq ArithmeticFunction.toFun_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : ℕ → R) (hf) : @DFunLike.coe (ArithmeticFunction R) _ _ _
(ZeroHom.mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f 0 = 0 :=
ZeroHom.map_zero' f
#align nat.arithmetic_function.map_zero ArithmeticFunction.map_zero
theorem coe_inj {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f : ℕ → R) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_inj ArithmeticFunction.coe_inj
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : ℕ} : (0 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
ZeroHom.zero_apply x
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zero_apply ArithmeticFunction.zero_apply
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : ArithmeticFunction R⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
ZeroHom.ext h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ext ArithmeticFunction.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ext_iff ArithmeticFunction.ext_iff
section One
variable [One R]
instance one : One (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨⟨fun x => ite (x = 1) 1 0, rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_apply {x : ℕ} : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = ite (x = 1) 1 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_apply ArithmeticFunction.one_apply
@[simp]
theorem one_one : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_one ArithmeticFunction.one_one
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 1) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
if_neg h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_apply_ne ArithmeticFunction.one_apply_ne
end One
end Zero
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℕ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `natCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe] -- Porting note: added `coe` tag.
def natToArithmeticFunction [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℕ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance natCoe [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℕ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨natToArithmeticFunction⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe ArithmeticFunction.natCoe
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_nat (f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : natToArithmeticFunction f = f :=
ext fun _ => cast_id _
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_nat ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_nat
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_apply [AddMonoidWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_apply ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_apply
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℤ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `intCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def ofInt [AddGroupWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℤ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance intCoe [AddGroupWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℤ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨ofInt⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe ArithmeticFunction.intCoe
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_int (f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ofInt f = f :=
ext fun _ => Int.cast_id
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_int ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_int
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_apply [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x := rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_apply ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
((f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = (f : ArithmeticFunction R) := by
ext
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_coe ArithmeticFunction.coe_coe
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_one ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_one
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_one [AddGroupWithOne R] : ((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) :
ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_one ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_one
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid R]
instance add : Add (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => f n + g n, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} : (f + g) n = f n + g n :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_apply ArithmeticFunction.add_apply
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.zero R,
ArithmeticFunction.add with
add_assoc := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_assoc _ _ _
zero_add := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_add _
add_zero := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_zero _
nsmul := nsmulRec }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_monoid ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid
end AddMonoid
instance instAddMonoidWithOne [AddMonoidWithOne R] : AddMonoidWithOne (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.one with
natCast := fun n => ⟨fun x => if x = 1 then (n : R) else 0, by simp⟩
natCast_zero := by ext; simp
natCast_succ := fun n => by ext x; by_cases h : x = 1 <;> simp [h] }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_monoid_with_one ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with add_comm := fun _ _ => ext fun _ => add_comm _ _ }
instance [NegZeroClass R] : Neg (ArithmeticFunction R) where
neg f := ⟨fun n => -f n, by simp⟩
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with
add_left_neg := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_left_neg _
zsmul := zsmulRec }
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ show AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) by infer_instance with
add_comm := fun _ _ ↦ add_comm _ _ }
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [Zero R] [AddCommMonoid M] [SMul R M]
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance : SMul (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {g : ArithmeticFunction M} {n : ℕ} :
(f • g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.smul_apply ArithmeticFunction.smul_apply
end SMul
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance [Semiring R] : Mul (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨(· • ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} :
(f * g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst * g x.snd :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.mul_apply
theorem mul_apply_one [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f * g) 1 = f 1 * g 1 := by simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_apply_one ArithmeticFunction.mul_apply_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCoe_mul [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = f * g := by
ext n
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_mul ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCoe_mul [Ring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ↑f * g := by
ext n
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_mul ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_mul
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
theorem mul_smul' (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (h : ArithmeticFunction M) :
(f * g) • h = f • g • h := by
ext n
simp only [mul_apply, smul_apply, sum_smul, mul_smul, smul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l * j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i * k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp mul_assoc)
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_smul' ArithmeticFunction.mul_smul'
theorem one_smul' (b : ArithmeticFunction M) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) • b = b := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(1, x)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y1ne : y.fst ≠ 1 := by
intro con
simp only [Con, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, one_mul, Ne] at ymem
simp only [mem_singleton, Prod.ext_iff] at ynmem
-- Porting note: `tauto` worked from here.
cases y
subst con
simp only [true_and, one_mul, x0, not_false_eq_true, and_true] at ynmem ymem
tauto
simp [y1ne]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_smul' ArithmeticFunction.one_smul'
end Module
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ one := One.one
mul := Mul.mul
one_mul := one_smul'
mul_one := fun f => by
ext x
rw [mul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(x, 1)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y2ne : y.snd ≠ 1 := by
intro con
cases y; subst con -- Porting note: added
simp only [Con, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_one, Ne] at ymem
simp only [mem_singleton, Prod.ext_iff] at ynmem
tauto
simp [y2ne]
mul_assoc := mul_smul' }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.monoid ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid
instance instSemiring : Semiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: I reorganized this instance
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne,
ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.instAddCommMonoid with
zero_mul := fun f => by
ext
simp only [mul_apply, zero_mul, sum_const_zero, zero_apply]
mul_zero := fun f => by
ext
simp only [mul_apply, sum_const_zero, mul_zero, zero_apply]
left_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp only [← sum_add_distrib, mul_add, mul_apply, add_apply]
right_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp only [← sum_add_distrib, add_mul, mul_apply, add_apply] }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.semiring ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
ext
rw [mul_apply, ← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, sum_map]
simp [mul_comm] }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
add_left_neg := add_left_neg
mul_comm := mul_comm
zsmul := (· • ·) }
instance {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
Module (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) where
one_smul := one_smul'
mul_smul := mul_smul'
smul_add r x y := by
ext
simp only [sum_add_distrib, smul_add, smul_apply, add_apply]
smul_zero r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, smul_zero, zero_apply]
add_smul r s x := by
ext
simp only [add_smul, sum_add_distrib, smul_apply, add_apply]
zero_smul r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, zero_smul, zero_apply]
section Zeta
/-- `ζ 0 = 0`, otherwise `ζ x = 1`. The Dirichlet Series is the Riemann `ζ`. -/
def zeta : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun x => ite (x = 0) 0 1, rfl⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.zeta] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_apply {x : ℕ} : ζ x = if x = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.zeta_apply
theorem zeta_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 0) : ζ x = 1 :=
if_neg h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_apply_ne ArithmeticFunction.zeta_apply_ne
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]`, LHS not in normal form
theorem coe_zeta_smul_apply {M} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
{f : ArithmeticFunction M} {x : ℕ} :
((↑ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) • f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [smul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.snd
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (left_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, one_smul]
· rw [← map_div_left_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_smul_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_zeta_smul_apply
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]` to make the linter happy.
theorem coe_zeta_mul_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(↑ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_smul_apply
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_zeta_mul_apply
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]` to make the linter happy.
theorem coe_mul_zeta_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [mul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.1
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (right_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, mul_one]
· rw [← map_div_right_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_mul_zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_mul_zeta_apply
theorem zeta_mul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_mul_apply
-- Porting note: was `by rw [← nat_coe_nat ζ, coe_zeta_mul_apply]`. Is this `theorem` obsolete?
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.zeta_mul_apply
theorem mul_zeta_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_mul_zeta_apply
-- Porting note: was `by rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_mul_zeta_apply]`. Is this `theorem` obsolete=
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.mul_zeta_apply
end Zeta
open ArithmeticFunction
section Pmul
/-- This is the pointwise product of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pmul [MulZeroClass R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun x => f x * g x, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul ArithmeticFunction.pmul
@[simp]
theorem pmul_apply [MulZeroClass R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} : f.pmul g x = f x * g x :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_apply ArithmeticFunction.pmul_apply
theorem pmul_comm [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul g = g.pmul f := by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_comm ArithmeticFunction.pmul_comm
lemma pmul_assoc [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f₁ f₂ f₃ : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pmul (pmul f₁ f₂) f₃ = pmul f₁ (pmul f₂ f₃) := by
ext
simp only [pmul_apply, mul_assoc]
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring R]
@[simp]
theorem pmul_zeta (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul ↑ζ = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_zeta ArithmeticFunction.pmul_zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_pmul (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R).pmul f = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_pmul ArithmeticFunction.zeta_pmul
end NonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- This is the pointwise power of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def ppow (f : ArithmeticFunction R) (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
if h0 : k = 0 then ζ else ⟨fun x ↦ f x ^ k, by simp_rw [map_zero, zero_pow h0]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow ArithmeticFunction.ppow
@[simp]
theorem ppow_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f.ppow 0 = ζ := by rw [ppow, dif_pos rfl]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_zero ArithmeticFunction.ppow_zero
@[simp]
theorem ppow_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k x : ℕ} (kpos : 0 < k) : f.ppow k x = f x ^ k := by
rw [ppow, dif_neg (Nat.ne_of_gt kpos)]
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_apply ArithmeticFunction.ppow_apply
theorem ppow_succ' {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} : f.ppow (k + 1) = f.pmul (f.ppow k) := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ']
induction k <;> simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_succ ArithmeticFunction.ppow_succ'
theorem ppow_succ {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} {kpos : 0 < k} :
f.ppow (k + 1) = (f.ppow k).pmul f := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ]
induction k <;> simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_succ' ArithmeticFunction.ppow_succ
end Pmul
section Pdiv
/-- This is the pointwise division of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pdiv [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun n => f n / g n, by simp only [map_zero, ne_eq, not_true, div_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_apply [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (n : ℕ) :
pdiv f g n = f n / g n := rfl
/-- This result only holds for `DivisionSemiring`s instead of `GroupWithZero`s because zeta takes
values in ℕ, and hence the coercion requires an `AddMonoidWithOne`. TODO: Generalise zeta -/
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_zeta [DivisionSemiring R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pdiv f zeta = f := by
ext n
cases n <;> simp [succ_ne_zero]
end Pdiv
section ProdPrimeFactors
/-- The map $n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$ as an arithmetic function -/
def prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) : ArithmeticFunction R where
toFun d := if d = 0 then 0 else ∏ p ∈ d.primeFactors, f p
map_zero' := if_pos rfl
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` is custom notation for `prodPrimeFactors f n` -/
scoped syntax (name := bigproddvd) "∏ᵖ " extBinder " ∣ " term ", " term:67 : term
scoped macro_rules (kind := bigproddvd)
| `(∏ᵖ $x:ident ∣ $n, $r) => `(prodPrimeFactors (fun $x ↦ $r) $n)
@[simp]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f: ℕ → R} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p :=
if_neg hn
end ProdPrimeFactors
/-- Multiplicative functions -/
def IsMultiplicative [MonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : Prop :=
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative
namespace IsMultiplicative
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R]
@[simp, arith_mult]
theorem map_one {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h : f.IsMultiplicative) : f 1 = 1 :=
h.1
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_one ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_one
@[simp]
theorem map_mul_of_coprime {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m.Coprime n) : f (m * n) = f m * f n :=
hf.2 h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime
end MonoidWithZero
theorem map_prod {ι : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (g : ι → ℕ) {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (s : Finset ι) (hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Coprime on g)) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih hs
· simp [hf]
rw [coe_insert, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (Coprime.symmetric.comap g)] at hs
rw [prod_insert has, prod_insert has, hf.map_mul_of_coprime, ih hs.1]
exact .prod_right fun i hi => hs.2 _ hi (hi.ne_of_not_mem has).symm
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_prod ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_prod
theorem map_prod_of_prime [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : ∀ p ∈ t, p.Prime) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod _ h_mult t fun x hx y hy hxy => (coprime_primes (ht x hx) (ht y hy)).mpr hxy
theorem map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f) (l : ℕ)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : t ⊆ l.primeFactors) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod_of_prime h_mult t fun _ a => prime_of_mem_primeFactors (ht a)
@[arith_mult]
theorem natCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} [Semiring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: was `by simp [cop, h]`
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.nat_cast ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast := natCast
@[arith_mult]
theorem intCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} [Ring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: was `by simp [cop, h]`
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.int_cast ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast := intCast
@[arith_mult]
theorem mul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f * g) := by
refine ⟨by simp [hf.1, hg.1], ?_⟩
simp only [mul_apply]
intro m n cop
rw [sum_mul_sum, ← sum_product']
symm
apply sum_nbij fun ((i, j), k, l) ↦ (i * k, j * l)
· rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ h
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Nat.mul_eq_zero, Ne]
constructor
· ring
rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero] at *
apply not_or_of_not ha hb
· simp only [Set.InjOn, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product, Prod.mk.inj_iff]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩ ⟨⟨c1, c2⟩, ⟨d1, d2⟩⟩ hcd h
simp only [Prod.mk.inj_iff] at h
ext <;> dsimp only
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one,
mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.2, mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.1, mul_comm c1 d1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_right, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one,
one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.2, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· simp only [Set.SurjOn, Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product,
Set.mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk.inj_iff]
rintro ⟨b1, b2⟩ h
dsimp at h
use ((b1.gcd m, b2.gcd m), (b1.gcd n, b2.gcd n))
rw [← cop.gcd_mul _, ← cop.gcd_mul _, ← h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop h.1,
Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop.symm _]
· rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp [h.2.1, h.2.2]
rw [mul_comm n m, h.1]
· simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
dsimp only
rw [hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_right_right,
hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_left_right]
ring
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.mul ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.mul
@[arith_mult]
theorem pmul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f.pmul g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pmul_apply, hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop, hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop]
ring⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.pmul ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.pmul
@[arith_mult]
theorem pdiv [CommGroupWithZero R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : IsMultiplicative f)
(hg : IsMultiplicative g) : IsMultiplicative (pdiv f g) :=
⟨ by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pdiv_apply, map_mul_of_coprime hf cop, map_mul_of_coprime hg cop,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv]
apply mul_mul_mul_comm ⟩
/-- For any multiplicative function `f` and any `n > 0`,
we can evaluate `f n` by evaluating `f` at `p ^ k` over the factorization of `n` -/
nonrec -- Porting note: added
theorem multiplicative_factorization [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => f (p ^ k) :=
multiplicative_factorization f (fun _ _ => hf.2) hf.1 hn
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.multiplicative_factorization ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.multiplicative_factorization
/-- A recapitulation of the definition of multiplicative that is simpler for proofs -/
theorem iff_ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} :
IsMultiplicative f ↔
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≠ 0 → n ≠ 0 → m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n := by
refine and_congr_right' (forall₂_congr fun m n => ⟨fun h _ _ => h, fun h hmn => ?_⟩)
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
exact h hm hn hmn
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.iff_ne_zero ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero
/-- Two multiplicative functions `f` and `g` are equal if and only if
they agree on prime powers -/
theorem eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (g : ArithmeticFunction R) (hg : g.IsMultiplicative) :
f = g ↔ ∀ p i : ℕ, Nat.Prime p → f (p ^ i) = g (p ^ i) := by
constructor
· intro h p i _
rw [h]
intro h
ext n
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero]
rw [multiplicative_factorization f hf hn, multiplicative_factorization g hg hn]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun p hp ↦ h p _ (Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers
@[arith_mult]
theorem prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) :
IsMultiplicative (prodPrimeFactors f) := by
rw [iff_ne_zero]
simp only [ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, prodPrimeFactors_apply, primeFactors_one,
prod_empty, true_and]
intro x y hx hy hxy
have hxy₀ : x * y ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hx hy
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hxy₀, prodPrimeFactors_apply hx, prodPrimeFactors_apply hy,
Nat.primeFactors_mul hx hy, ← Finset.prod_union hxy.disjoint_primeFactors]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) (hg : IsMultiplicative g) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, (f + g) p = (f * g) n := by
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero]
simp_rw [add_apply (f:=f) (g:=g)]
rw [Finset.prod_add, mul_apply, sum_divisorsAntidiagonal (f · * g ·),
← divisors_filter_squarefree_of_squarefree hn, sum_divisors_filter_squarefree hn.ne_zero,
factors_eq]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro t ht
rw [t.prod_val, Function.id_def,
← prod_primeFactors_sdiff_of_squarefree hn (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
hf.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n t (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
← hg.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n (_ \ t) Finset.sdiff_subset]
theorem lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} :
f (x.lcm y) * f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp only [hx, f.map_zero, zero_mul, Nat.lcm_zero_left, Nat.gcd_zero_left]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp only [hy, f.map_zero, mul_zero, Nat.lcm_zero_right, Nat.gcd_zero_right, zero_mul]
have hgcd_ne_zero : x.gcd y ≠ 0 := gcd_ne_zero_left hx
have hlcm_ne_zero : x.lcm y ≠ 0 := lcm_ne_zero hx hy
have hfi_zero : ∀ {i}, f (i ^ 0) = 1 := by
intro i; rw [Nat.pow_zero, hf.1]
iterate 4 rw [hf.multiplicative_factorization f (by assumption),
Finsupp.prod_of_support_subset _ _ _ (fun _ _ => hfi_zero)
(s := (x.primeFactors ⊔ y.primeFactors))]
· rw [← Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro p _
rcases Nat.le_or_le (x.factorization p) (y.factorization p) with h | h <;>
simp only [factorization_lcm hx hy, ge_iff_le, Finsupp.sup_apply, h, sup_of_le_right,
sup_of_le_left, inf_of_le_right, Nat.factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.inf_apply,
inf_of_le_left, mul_comm]
· apply Finset.subset_union_right
· apply Finset.subset_union_left
· rw [factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.support_inf, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.inter_subset_union
· simp [factorization_lcm hx hy]
end IsMultiplicative
section SpecialFunctions
/-- The identity on `ℕ` as an `ArithmeticFunction`. -/
nonrec -- Porting note (#11445): added
def id : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨id, rfl⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.id ArithmeticFunction.id
@[simp]
theorem id_apply {x : ℕ} : id x = x :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.id_apply ArithmeticFunction.id_apply
/-- `pow k n = n ^ k`, except `pow 0 0 = 0`. -/
def pow (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
id.ppow k
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pow ArithmeticFunction.pow
@[simp]
theorem pow_apply {k n : ℕ} : pow k n = if k = 0 ∧ n = 0 then 0 else n ^ k := by
cases k
· simp [pow]
rename_i k -- Porting note: added
simp [pow, k.succ_pos.ne']
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pow_apply ArithmeticFunction.pow_apply
theorem pow_zero_eq_zeta : pow 0 = ζ := by
ext n
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pow_zero_eq_zeta ArithmeticFunction.pow_zero_eq_zeta
/-- `σ k n` is the sum of the `k`th powers of the divisors of `n` -/
def sigma (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma ArithmeticFunction.sigma
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.sigma] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
theorem sigma_apply {k n : ℕ} : σ k n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma_apply ArithmeticFunction.sigma_apply
theorem sigma_one_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 1 n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d := by simp [sigma_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma_one_apply ArithmeticFunction.sigma_one_apply
theorem sigma_zero_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 0 n = (divisors n).card := by simp [sigma_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma_zero_apply ArithmeticFunction.sigma_zero_apply
theorem sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow {p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : σ 0 (p ^ i) = i + 1 := by
rw [sigma_zero_apply, divisors_prime_pow hp, card_map, card_range]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow ArithmeticFunction.sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow
theorem zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma {k : ℕ} : ζ * pow k = σ k := by
ext
rw [sigma, zeta_mul_apply]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [pow_apply, if_neg (not_and_of_not_right _ _)]
contrapose! hx
simp [hx]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma ArithmeticFunction.zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_one [MonoidWithZero R] : IsMultiplicative (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2
⟨by simp, by
intro m n hm _hn hmn
rcases eq_or_ne m 1 with (rfl | hm')
· simp
rw [one_apply_ne, one_apply_ne hm', zero_mul]
rw [Ne, mul_eq_one, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl hm'⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_one ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_one
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_zeta : IsMultiplicative ζ :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2 ⟨by simp, by simp (config := { contextual := true })⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_zeta ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_zeta
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_id : IsMultiplicative ArithmeticFunction.id :=
⟨rfl, fun {_ _} _ => rfl⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_id ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_id
@[arith_mult]
theorem IsMultiplicative.ppow [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
{k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (f.ppow k) := by
induction' k with k hi
· exact isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast
· rw [ppow_succ']
apply hf.pmul hi
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.ppow ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.ppow
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_pow {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (pow k) :=
isMultiplicative_id.ppow
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_pow ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_pow
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_sigma {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (σ k) := by
rw [← zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma]
apply isMultiplicative_zeta.mul isMultiplicative_pow
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_sigma ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_sigma
/-- `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.factors.length, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Omega] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
theorem cardFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : Ω n = n.factors.length :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_apply ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_apply
lemma cardFactors_zero : Ω 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp] theorem cardFactors_one : Ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardFactors_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_one ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_one
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime {n : ℕ} : Ω n = 1 ↔ n.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => List.length_eq_one.2 ⟨n, factors_prime h⟩⟩
cases' n with n
· simp at h
rcases List.length_eq_one.1 h with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← prod_factors n.add_one_ne_zero, hx, List.prod_singleton]
apply prime_of_mem_factors
rw [hx, List.mem_singleton]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_eq_one_iff_prime ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime
theorem cardFactors_mul {m n : ℕ} (m0 : m ≠ 0) (n0 : n ≠ 0) : Ω (m * n) = Ω m + Ω n := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, ← Multiset.coe_card, ← factors_eq,
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors_mul m0 n0, factors_eq, factors_eq,
Multiset.card_add, Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_card]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_mul ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_mul
theorem cardFactors_multiset_prod {s : Multiset ℕ} (h0 : s.prod ≠ 0) :
Ω s.prod = (Multiset.map Ω s).sum := by
induction s using Multiset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| cons ih => simp_all [cardFactors_mul, not_or]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_multiset_prod ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_multiset_prod
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω p = 1 :=
cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime.2 hp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_apply_prime ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_apply_prime
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω (p ^ k) = k := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, hp.factors_pow, List.length_replicate]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_apply_prime_pow ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_apply_prime_pow
/-- `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardDistinctFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.factors.dedup.length, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_distinct_factors ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.omega] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
theorem cardDistinctFactors_zero : ω 0 = 0 := by simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_distinct_factors_zero ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors_zero
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_one : ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardDistinctFactors]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_distinct_factors_one ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors_one
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : ω n = n.factors.dedup.length :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_distinct_factors_apply ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors_apply
theorem cardDistinctFactors_eq_cardFactors_iff_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
ω n = Ω n ↔ Squarefree n := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_factors h0, cardDistinctFactors_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← n.factors.dedup_sublist.eq_of_length h]
apply List.nodup_dedup
· rw [h.dedup]
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_distinct_factors_eq_card_factors_iff_squarefree ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors_eq_cardFactors_iff_squarefree
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
ω (p ^ k) = 1 := by
rw [cardDistinctFactors_apply, hp.factors_pow, List.replicate_dedup hk, List.length_singleton]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_distinct_factors_apply_prime_pow ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : ω p = 1 := by
rw [← pow_one p, cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow hp one_ne_zero]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_distinct_factors_apply_prime ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime
/-- `μ` is the Möbius function. If `n` is squarefree with an even number of distinct prime factors,
`μ n = 1`. If `n` is squarefree with an odd number of distinct prime factors, `μ n = -1`.
If `n` is not squarefree, `μ n = 0`. -/
def moebius : ArithmeticFunction ℤ :=
⟨fun n => if Squarefree n then (-1) ^ cardFactors n else 0, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "μ" => ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Moebius] notation "μ" => ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[simp]
theorem moebius_apply_of_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h : Squarefree n) : μ n = (-1) ^ cardFactors n :=
if_pos h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_apply_of_squarefree ArithmeticFunction.moebius_apply_of_squarefree
@[simp]
theorem moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h : ¬Squarefree n) : μ n = 0 :=
if_neg h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree ArithmeticFunction.moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree
theorem moebius_apply_one : μ 1 = 1 := by simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_apply_one ArithmeticFunction.moebius_apply_one
theorem moebius_ne_zero_iff_squarefree {n : ℕ} : μ n ≠ 0 ↔ Squarefree n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· contrapose! h
simp [h]
· simp [h, pow_ne_zero]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_ne_zero_iff_squarefree ArithmeticFunction.moebius_ne_zero_iff_squarefree
theorem moebius_eq_or (n : ℕ) : μ n = 0 ∨ μ n = 1 ∨ μ n = -1 := by
simp only [moebius, coe_mk]
split_ifs
· right
exact neg_one_pow_eq_or ..
· left
rfl
theorem moebius_ne_zero_iff_eq_or {n : ℕ} : μ n ≠ 0 ↔ μ n = 1 ∨ μ n = -1 := by
have := moebius_eq_or n
aesop
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_ne_zero_iff_eq_or ArithmeticFunction.moebius_ne_zero_iff_eq_or
theorem moebius_sq_eq_one_of_squarefree {l : ℕ} (hl : Squarefree l) : μ l ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hl, ← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, neg_one_sq, one_pow]
theorem abs_moebius_eq_one_of_squarefree {l : ℕ} (hl : Squarefree l) : |μ l| = 1 := by
simp only [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hl, abs_pow, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
theorem moebius_sq {n : ℕ} :
μ n ^ 2 = if Squarefree n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact moebius_sq_eq_one_of_squarefree h
· simp only [pow_eq_zero_iff, moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree h,
zero_pow (show 2 ≠ 0 by norm_num)]
theorem abs_moebius {n : ℕ} :
|μ n| = if Squarefree n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact abs_moebius_eq_one_of_squarefree h
· simp only [moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree h, abs_zero]
theorem abs_moebius_le_one {n : ℕ} : |μ n| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_moebius, apply_ite (· ≤ 1)]
simp
theorem moebius_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : μ p = -1 := by
rw [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hp.squarefree, cardFactors_apply_prime hp, pow_one]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_apply_prime ArithmeticFunction.moebius_apply_prime
theorem moebius_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
μ (p ^ k) = if k = 1 then -1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_one, moebius_apply_prime hp]
rw [moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree]
rw [squarefree_pow_iff hp.ne_one hk, not_and_or]
exact Or.inr h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_apply_prime_pow ArithmeticFunction.moebius_apply_prime_pow
theorem moebius_apply_isPrimePow_not_prime {n : ℕ} (hn : IsPrimePow n) (hn' : ¬n.Prime) :
μ n = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, k, hp, hk, rfl⟩ := (isPrimePow_nat_iff _).1 hn
rw [moebius_apply_prime_pow hp hk.ne', if_neg]
rintro rfl
exact hn' (by simpa)
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_apply_is_prime_pow_not_prime ArithmeticFunction.moebius_apply_isPrimePow_not_prime
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_moebius : IsMultiplicative μ := by
rw [IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero]
refine ⟨by simp, fun {n m} hn hm hnm => ?_⟩
simp only [moebius, ZeroHom.coe_mk, coe_mk, ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, Eq.ndrec, ZeroHom.coe_mk,
IsUnit.mul_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff, squarefree_mul hnm, ite_zero_mul_ite_zero,
cardFactors_mul hn hm, pow_add]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_moebius ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_moebius
theorem IsMultiplicative.prodPrimeFactors_one_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R]
{f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h_mult : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 + f p) = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, f d := by
trans (∏ᵖ p ∣ n, ((ζ:ArithmeticFunction R) + f) p)
· simp_rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero, add_apply, natCoe_apply]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl; intro p hp;
rw [zeta_apply_ne (prime_of_mem_factors <| List.mem_toFinset.mp hp).ne_zero, cast_one]
rw [isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast.prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree h_mult hn,
coe_zeta_mul_apply]
theorem IsMultiplicative.prodPrimeFactors_one_sub_of_squarefree [CommRing R]
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 - f p) = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, μ d * f d := by
trans (∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 + (ArithmeticFunction.pmul (μ:ArithmeticFunction R) f) p))
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl; intro p hp
rw [pmul_apply, intCoe_apply, ArithmeticFunction.moebius_apply_prime
(prime_of_mem_factors (List.mem_toFinset.mp hp))]
ring
· rw [(isMultiplicative_moebius.intCast.pmul hf).prodPrimeFactors_one_add_of_squarefree hn]
simp_rw [pmul_apply, intCoe_apply]
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
@[simp]
theorem moebius_mul_coe_zeta : (μ * ζ : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) = 1 := by
ext n
refine recOnPosPrimePosCoprime ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ n
· intro p n hp hn
rw [coe_mul_zeta_apply, sum_divisors_prime_pow hp, sum_range_succ']
simp_rw [Nat.pow_zero, moebius_apply_one,
moebius_apply_prime_pow hp (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), Nat.succ_inj', sum_ite_eq', mem_range,
if_pos hn, add_left_neg]
rw [one_apply_ne]
rw [Ne, pow_eq_one_iff]
· exact hp.ne_one
· exact hn.ne'
· rw [ZeroHom.map_zero, ZeroHom.map_zero]
· simp
· intro a b _ha _hb hab ha' hb'
rw [IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime _ hab, ha', hb',
IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime isMultiplicative_one hab]
exact isMultiplicative_moebius.mul isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast
#align nat.arithmetic_function.moebius_mul_coe_zeta ArithmeticFunction.moebius_mul_coe_zeta
@[simp]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_moebius : (ζ * μ : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, moebius_mul_coe_zeta]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_mul_moebius ArithmeticFunction.coe_zeta_mul_moebius
@[simp]
theorem coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta [Ring R] : (μ * ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
rw [← coe_coe, ← intCoe_mul, moebius_mul_coe_zeta, intCoe_one]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta ArithmeticFunction.coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta
@[simp]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius [Ring R] : (ζ * μ : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
rw [← coe_coe, ← intCoe_mul, coe_zeta_mul_moebius, intCoe_one]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius ArithmeticFunction.coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
instance : Invertible (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) where
invOf := μ
invOf_mul_self := coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta
mul_invOf_self := coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius
/-- A unit in `ArithmeticFunction R` that evaluates to `ζ`, with inverse `μ`. -/
def zetaUnit : (ArithmeticFunction R)ˣ :=
⟨ζ, μ, coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius, coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_unit ArithmeticFunction.zetaUnit
@[simp]
theorem coe_zetaUnit : ((zetaUnit : (ArithmeticFunction R)ˣ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ζ :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_unit ArithmeticFunction.coe_zetaUnit
@[simp]
theorem inv_zetaUnit : ((zetaUnit⁻¹ : (ArithmeticFunction R)ˣ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = μ :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.inv_zeta_unit ArithmeticFunction.inv_zetaUnit
end CommRing
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to an `AddCommGroup`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ArithmeticFunction.lean | 1,232 | 1,264 | theorem sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq [AddCommGroup R] {f g : ℕ → R} :
(∀ n > 0, ∑ i ∈ n.divisors, f i = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, ∑ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, μ x.fst • g x.snd = f n := by |
let f' : ArithmeticFunction R := ⟨fun x => if x = 0 then 0 else f x, if_pos rfl⟩
let g' : ArithmeticFunction R := ⟨fun x => if x = 0 then 0 else g x, if_pos rfl⟩
trans (ζ : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) • f' = g'
· rw [ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro n
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
rw [coe_zeta_smul_apply]
simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, forall_prop_of_true, succ_pos', if_false, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
simp only [f', g', coe_mk, succ_ne_zero, ite_false]
rw [sum_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_]
rw [if_neg (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors hx).ne']
trans μ • g' = f'
· constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h, ← mul_smul, moebius_mul_coe_zeta, one_smul]
· rw [← h, ← mul_smul, coe_zeta_mul_moebius, one_smul]
· rw [ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro n
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, forall_prop_of_true, succ_pos', smul_apply, if_false,
ZeroHom.coe_mk]
-- Porting note: added following `simp only`
simp only [f', g', Nat.isUnit_iff, coe_mk, ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, succ_ne_zero, ite_false]
rw [sum_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_]
rw [if_neg (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors (snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal hx)).ne']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Kevin Buzzard, Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Algebra
#align_import algebra.direct_sum.internal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9936c3dfc04e5876f4368aeb2e60f8d8358d095a"
/-!
# Internally graded rings and algebras
This module provides `DirectSum.GSemiring` and `DirectSum.GCommSemiring` instances for a collection
of subobjects `A` when a `SetLike.GradedMonoid` instance is available:
* `SetLike.gnonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`
* `SetLike.gsemiring`
* `SetLike.gcommSemiring`
With these instances in place, it provides the bundled canonical maps out of a direct sum of
subobjects into their carrier type:
* `DirectSum.coeRingHom` (a `RingHom` version of `DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom`)
* `DirectSum.coeAlgHom` (an `AlgHom` version of `DirectSum.coeLinearMap`)
Strictly the definitions in this file are not sufficient to fully define an "internal" direct sum;
to represent this case, `(h : DirectSum.IsInternal A) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]` is
needed. In the future there will likely be a data-carrying, constructive, typeclass version of
`DirectSum.IsInternal` for providing an explicit decomposition function.
When `CompleteLattice.Independent (Set.range A)` (a weaker condition than
`DirectSum.IsInternal A`), these provide a grading of `⨆ i, A i`, and the
mapping `⨁ i, A i →+ ⨆ i, A i` can be obtained as
`DirectSum.toAddMonoid (fun i ↦ AddSubmonoid.inclusion <| le_iSup A i)`.
## Tags
internally graded ring
-/
open DirectSum
variable {ι : Type*} {σ S R : Type*}
instance AddCommMonoid.ofSubmonoidOnSemiring [Semiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R]
(A : ι → σ) : ∀ i, AddCommMonoid (A i) := fun i => by infer_instance
#align add_comm_monoid.of_submonoid_on_semiring AddCommMonoid.ofSubmonoidOnSemiring
instance AddCommGroup.ofSubgroupOnRing [Ring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubgroupClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) :
∀ i, AddCommGroup (A i) := fun i => by infer_instance
#align add_comm_group.of_subgroup_on_ring AddCommGroup.ofSubgroupOnRing
theorem SetLike.algebraMap_mem_graded [Zero ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R]
(A : ι → Submodule S R) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (s : S) : algebraMap S R s ∈ A 0 := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
exact (A 0).smul_mem s <| SetLike.one_mem_graded _
#align set_like.algebra_map_mem_graded SetLike.algebraMap_mem_graded
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Internal.lean | 62 | 68 | theorem SetLike.natCast_mem_graded [Zero ι] [AddMonoidWithOne R] [SetLike σ R]
[AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (n : ℕ) : (n : R) ∈ A 0 := by |
induction' n with _ n_ih
· rw [Nat.cast_zero]
exact zero_mem (A 0)
· rw [Nat.cast_succ]
exact add_mem n_ih (SetLike.one_mem_graded _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LocallyIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
#align_import analysis.convolution from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8905e5ed90859939681a725b00f6063e65096d95"
/-!
# Convolution of functions
This file defines the convolution on two functions, i.e. `x ↦ ∫ f(t)g(x - t) ∂t`.
In the general case, these functions can be vector-valued, and have an arbitrary (additive)
group as domain. We use a continuous bilinear operation `L` on these function values as
"multiplication". The domain must be equipped with a Haar measure `μ`
(though many individual results have weaker conditions on `μ`).
For many applications we can take `L = ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℝ` or
`L = ContinuousLinearMap.mul ℝ ℝ`.
We also define `ConvolutionExists` and `ConvolutionExistsAt` to state that the convolution is
well-defined (everywhere or at a single point). These conditions are needed for pointwise
computations (e.g. `ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add`), but are generally not strong enough for any
local (or global) properties of the convolution. For this we need stronger assumptions on `f`
and/or `g`, and generally if we impose stronger conditions on one of the functions, we can impose
weaker conditions on the other.
We have proven many of the properties of the convolution assuming one of these functions
has compact support (in which case the other function only needs to be locally integrable).
We still need to prove the properties for other pairs of conditions (e.g. both functions are
rapidly decreasing)
# Design Decisions
We use a bilinear map `L` to "multiply" the two functions in the integrand.
This generality has several advantages
* This allows us to compute the total derivative of the convolution, in case the functions are
multivariate. The total derivative is again a convolution, but where the codomains of the
functions can be higher-dimensional. See `HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right`.
* This allows us to use `@[to_additive]` everywhere (which would not be possible if we would use
`mul`/`smul` in the integral, since `@[to_additive]` will incorrectly also try to additivize
those definitions).
* We need to support the case where at least one of the functions is vector-valued, but if we use
`smul` to multiply the functions, that would be an asymmetric definition.
# Main Definitions
* `convolution f g L μ x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ` is the convolution of
`f` and `g` w.r.t. the continuous bilinear map `L` and measure `μ`.
* `ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ` states that the convolution `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x` is well-defined
(i.e. the integral exists).
* `ConvolutionExists f g L μ` states that the convolution `f ⋆[L, μ] g` is well-defined at each
point.
# Main Results
* `HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right` and
`HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_left`: we can compute the total derivative
of the convolution as a convolution with the total derivative of the right (left) function.
* `HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_right` and
`HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_left`: the convolution is `𝒞ⁿ` if one of the functions
is `𝒞ⁿ` with compact support and the other function in locally integrable.
Versions of these statements for functions depending on a parameter are also given.
* `convolution_tendsto_right`: Given a sequence of nonnegative normalized functions whose support
tends to a small neighborhood around `0`, the convolution tends to the right argument.
This is specialized to bump functions in `ContDiffBump.convolution_tendsto_right`.
# Notation
The following notations are localized in the locale `convolution`:
* `f ⋆[L, μ] g` for the convolution. Note: you have to use parentheses to apply the convolution
to an argument: `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x`.
* `f ⋆[L] g := f ⋆[L, volume] g`
* `f ⋆ g := f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ] g`
# To do
* Existence and (uniform) continuity of the convolution if
one of the maps is in `ℒ^p` and the other in `ℒ^q` with `1 / p + 1 / q = 1`.
This might require a generalization of `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.smul` where `smul` is generalized
to a continuous bilinear map.
(see e.g. [Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 2)][fremlin_vol2], 255K)
* The convolution is an `AEStronglyMeasurable` function
(see e.g. [Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 2)][fremlin_vol2], 255I).
* Prove properties about the convolution if both functions are rapidly decreasing.
* Use `@[to_additive]` everywhere (this likely requires changes in `to_additive`)
-/
open Set Function Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ContinuousLinearMap Metric Bornology
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal Filter
universe u𝕜 uG uE uE' uE'' uF uF' uF'' uP
variable {𝕜 : Type u𝕜} {G : Type uG} {E : Type uE} {E' : Type uE'} {E'' : Type uE''} {F : Type uF}
{F' : Type uF'} {F'' : Type uF''} {P : Type uP}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedAddCommGroup E'']
[NormedAddCommGroup F] {f f' : G → E} {g g' : G → E'} {x x' : G} {y y' : E}
namespace MeasureTheory
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
section NoMeasurability
variable [AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G]
theorem convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset {C : ℝ} (hC : ∀ i, ‖g i‖ ≤ C) {x t : G}
{s u : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hu : -tsupport g + s ⊆ u) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ u.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * C) t := by
-- Porting note: had to add `f := _`
refine le_indicator (f := fun t ↦ ‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖) (fun t _ => ?_) (fun t ht => ?_) t
· apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
· have : x - t ∉ support g := by
refine mt (fun hxt => hu ?_) ht
refine ⟨_, Set.neg_mem_neg.mpr (subset_closure hxt), _, hx, ?_⟩
simp only [neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
simp only [nmem_support.mp this, (L _).map_zero, norm_zero, le_rfl]
#align convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset MeasureTheory.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) (hg : Continuous g)
{x t : G} {s u : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hu : -tsupport g + s ⊆ u) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ u.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖) t := by
refine convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset _ (fun i => ?_) hx hu
exact le_ciSup (hg.norm.bddAbove_range_of_hasCompactSupport hcg.norm) _
#align has_compact_support.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hg : Continuous g) {x t : G} {s : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ (-tsupport g + s).indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖) t :=
hcg.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset L hg hx Subset.rfl
#align has_compact_support.convolution_integrand_bound_right HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right
theorem _root_.Continuous.convolution_integrand_fst [ContinuousSub G] (hg : Continuous g) (t : G) :
Continuous fun x => L (f t) (g (x - t)) :=
L.continuous₂.comp₂ continuous_const <| hg.comp <| continuous_id.sub continuous_const
#align continuous.convolution_integrand_fst Continuous.convolution_integrand_fst
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_left (hcf : HasCompactSupport f)
(hf : Continuous f) {x t : G} {s : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖L (f (x - t)) (g t)‖ ≤
(-tsupport f + s).indicator (fun t => (‖L‖ * ⨆ i, ‖f i‖) * ‖g t‖) t := by
convert hcf.convolution_integrand_bound_right L.flip hf hx using 1
simp_rw [L.opNorm_flip, mul_right_comm]
#align has_compact_support.convolution_integrand_bound_left HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_left
end NoMeasurability
section Measurability
variable [MeasurableSpace G] {μ ν : Measure G}
/-- The convolution of `f` and `g` exists at `x` when the function `t ↦ L (f t) (g (x - t))` is
integrable. There are various conditions on `f` and `g` to prove this. -/
def ConvolutionExistsAt [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (x : G) (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Integrable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ
#align convolution_exists_at MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt
/-- The convolution of `f` and `g` exists when the function `t ↦ L (f t) (g (x - t))` is integrable
for all `x : G`. There are various conditions on `f` and `g` to prove this. -/
def ConvolutionExists [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : G, ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ
#align convolution_exists MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExists
section ConvolutionExists
variable {L} in
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable [Sub G] {x : G} (h : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ) :
Integrable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
h
#align convolution_exists_at.integrable MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable
section Group
variable [AddGroup G]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand' [MeasurableAdd₂ G]
[MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite ν] (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun p : G × G => p.1 - p.2) (μ.prod ν)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf.snd <| hg.comp_measurable measurable_sub
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand'
section
variable [MeasurableAdd G] [MeasurableNeg G]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd'
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {x : G}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x - t) μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf <| hg.comp_measurable <| measurable_id.const_sub x
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand_snd' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd'
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd' {x : G}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f <| map (fun t => x - t) μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ (hf.comp_measurable <| measurable_id.const_sub x) hg
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd'
/-- A sufficient condition to prove that `f ⋆[L, μ] g` exists.
We assume that `f` is integrable on a set `s` and `g` is bounded and ae strongly measurable
on `x₀ - s` (note that both properties hold if `g` is continuous with compact support). -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt' {x₀ : G} {s : Set G}
(hbg : BddAbove ((fun i => ‖g i‖) '' ((fun t => -t + x₀) ⁻¹' s))) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) ⊆ s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x₀ - t) (μ.restrict s)) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
rw [ConvolutionExistsAt]
rw [← integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset h2s]
set s' := (fun t => -t + x₀) ⁻¹' s
have : ∀ᵐ t : G ∂μ.restrict s,
‖L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))‖ ≤ s.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i : s', ‖g i‖) t := by
filter_upwards
refine le_indicator (fun t ht => ?_) fun t ht => ?_
· apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
refine (le_ciSup_set hbg <| mem_preimage.mpr ?_)
rwa [neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
· have : t ∉ support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)) := mt (fun h => h2s h) ht
rw [nmem_support.mp this, norm_zero]
refine Integrable.mono' ?_ ?_ this
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hs]; exact ((hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _).integrableOn
· exact hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd' L hmg
#align bdd_above.convolution_exists_at' BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt'
/-- If `‖f‖ *[μ] ‖g‖` exists, then `f *[L, μ] g` exists. -/
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm' {x₀ : G}
(h : ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) x₀ (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hmf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x₀ - t) μ) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine (h.const_mul ‖L‖).mono'
(hmf.convolution_integrand_snd' L hmg) (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [mul_apply', ← mul_assoc]
apply L.le_opNorm₂
#align convolution_exists_at.of_norm' MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm'
end
section Left
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (x : G) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
hf.convolution_integrand_snd' L <|
hg.mono_ac <| (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x).absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand_snd MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (x : G) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
(hf.mono_ac
(quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ
x).absolutelyContinuous).convolution_integrand_swap_snd'
L hg
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd
/-- If `‖f‖ *[μ] ‖g‖` exists, then `f *[L, μ] g` exists. -/
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm {x₀ : G}
(h : ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) x₀ (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hmf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ :=
h.ofNorm' L hmf <|
hmg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x₀).absolutelyContinuous
#align convolution_exists_at.of_norm MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm
end Left
section Right
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
[SigmaFinite ν]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.convolution_integrand' L <|
hg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_of_right_invariant μ ν).absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand
theorem Integrable.convolution_integrand (hf : Integrable f ν) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) := by
have h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand L hg.aestronglyMeasurable
have h2_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y : G => ∫ x : G, ‖L (f y) (g (x - y))‖ ∂μ) ν :=
h_meas.prod_swap.norm.integral_prod_right'
simp_rw [integrable_prod_iff' h_meas]
refine ⟨eventually_of_forall fun t => (L (f t)).integrable_comp (hg.comp_sub_right t), ?_⟩
refine Integrable.mono' ?_ h2_meas
(eventually_of_forall fun t => (?_ : _ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ∫ x, ‖g (x - t)‖ ∂μ))
· simp only [integral_sub_right_eq_self (‖g ·‖)]
exact (hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· simp_rw [← integral_mul_left]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
exact integral_mono_of_nonneg (eventually_of_forall fun t => norm_nonneg _)
((hg.comp_sub_right t).norm.const_mul _) (eventually_of_forall fun t => L.le_opNorm₂ _ _)
#align measure_theory.integrable.convolution_integrand MeasureTheory.Integrable.convolution_integrand
theorem Integrable.ae_convolution_exists (hf : Integrable f ν) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L ν :=
((integrable_prod_iff <|
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand L hg.aestronglyMeasurable).mp <|
hf.convolution_integrand L hg).1
#align measure_theory.integrable.ae_convolution_exists MeasureTheory.Integrable.ae_convolution_exists
end Right
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalAddGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt {x₀ : G}
(h : HasCompactSupport fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : Continuous g) : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
let u := (Homeomorph.neg G).trans (Homeomorph.addRight x₀)
let v := (Homeomorph.neg G).trans (Homeomorph.addLeft x₀)
apply ((u.isCompact_preimage.mpr h).bddAbove_image hg.norm.continuousOn).convolutionExistsAt' L
isClosed_closure.measurableSet subset_closure (hf.integrableOn_isCompact h)
have A : AEStronglyMeasurable (g ∘ v)
(μ.restrict (tsupport fun t : G => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)))) := by
apply (hg.comp v.continuous).continuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact h
exact (isClosed_tsupport _).measurableSet
convert ((v.continuous.measurable.measurePreserving
(μ.restrict (tsupport fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))))).aestronglyMeasurable_comp_iff
v.measurableEmbedding).1 A
ext x
simp only [v, Homeomorph.neg, sub_eq_add_neg, val_toAddUnits_apply, Homeomorph.trans_apply,
Equiv.neg_apply, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Homeomorph.homeomorph_mk_coe, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Homeomorph.coe_addLeft]
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_at HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := by
intro x₀
refine HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ hf hg
refine (hcg.comp_homeomorph (Homeomorph.subLeft x₀)).mono ?_
refine fun t => mt fun ht : g (x₀ - t) = 0 => ?_
simp_rw [ht, (L _).map_zero]
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_right HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) :
ConvolutionExists f g L μ := by
intro x₀
refine HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ hf hg
refine hcf.mono ?_
refine fun t => mt fun ht : f t = 0 => ?_
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_left_of_continuous_right HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G]
section MeasurableGroup
variable [MeasurableNeg G] [IsAddLeftInvariant μ]
/-- A sufficient condition to prove that `f ⋆[L, μ] g` exists.
We assume that the integrand has compact support and `g` is bounded on this support (note that
both properties hold if `g` is continuous with compact support). We also require that `f` is
integrable on the support of the integrand, and that both functions are strongly measurable.
This is a variant of `BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt'` in an abelian group with a left-invariant
measure. This allows us to state the boundedness and measurability of `g` in a more natural way. -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [SigmaFinite μ] {x₀ : G} {s : Set G}
(hbg : BddAbove ((fun i => ‖g i‖) '' ((fun t => x₀ - t) ⁻¹' s))) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) ⊆ s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt' L ?_ hs h2s hf ?_
· simp_rw [← sub_eq_neg_add, hbg]
· have : AEStronglyMeasurable g (map (fun t : G => x₀ - t) μ) :=
hmg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x₀).absolutelyContinuous
apply this.mono_measure
exact map_mono restrict_le_self (measurable_const.sub measurable_id')
#align bdd_above.convolution_exists_at BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt
variable {L} [MeasurableAdd G] [IsNegInvariant μ]
theorem convolutionExistsAt_flip :
ConvolutionExistsAt g f x L.flip μ ↔ ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ := by
simp_rw [ConvolutionExistsAt, ← integrable_comp_sub_left (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) x,
sub_sub_cancel, flip_apply]
#align convolution_exists_at_flip MeasureTheory.convolutionExistsAt_flip
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable_swap (h : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ) :
Integrable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ := by
convert h.comp_sub_left x
simp_rw [sub_sub_self]
#align convolution_exists_at.integrable_swap MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable_swap
theorem convolutionExistsAt_iff_integrable_swap :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ ↔ Integrable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
convolutionExistsAt_flip.symm
#align convolution_exists_at_iff_integrable_swap MeasureTheory.convolutionExistsAt_iff_integrable_swap
end MeasurableGroup
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalAddGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [IsNegInvariant μ]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsLeft
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := fun x₀ =>
convolutionExistsAt_flip.mp <| hcf.convolutionExists_right L.flip hg hf x₀
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_left HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsLeft
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsRightOfContinuousLeft (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := fun x₀ =>
convolutionExistsAt_flip.mp <| hcg.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right L.flip hg hf x₀
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_right_of_continuous_left HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsRightOfContinuousLeft
end CommGroup
end ConvolutionExists
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- The convolution of two functions `f` and `g` with respect to a continuous bilinear map `L` and
measure `μ`. It is defined to be `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ`. -/
noncomputable def convolution [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : G → F := fun x =>
∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ
#align convolution MeasureTheory.convolution
/-- The convolution of two functions with respect to a bilinear operation `L` and a measure `μ`. -/
scoped[Convolution] notation:67 f " ⋆[" L:67 ", " μ:67 "] " g:66 => convolution f g L μ
/-- The convolution of two functions with respect to a bilinear operation `L` and the volume. -/
scoped[Convolution]
notation:67 f " ⋆[" L:67 "]" g:66 => convolution f g L MeasureSpace.volume
/-- The convolution of two real-valued functions with respect to volume. -/
scoped[Convolution]
notation:67 f " ⋆ " g:66 =>
convolution f g (ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℝ) MeasureSpace.volume
open scoped Convolution
theorem convolution_def [Sub G] : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ :=
rfl
#align convolution_def MeasureTheory.convolution_def
/-- The definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is scalar multiplication.
Note: it often helps the elaborator to give the type of the convolution explicitly. -/
theorem convolution_lsmul [Sub G] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → F} :
(f ⋆[lsmul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g : G → F) x = ∫ t, f t • g (x - t) ∂μ :=
rfl
#align convolution_lsmul MeasureTheory.convolution_lsmul
/-- The definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_mul [Sub G] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → 𝕜} :
(f ⋆[mul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g) x = ∫ t, f t * g (x - t) ∂μ :=
rfl
#align convolution_mul MeasureTheory.convolution_mul
section Group
variable {L} [AddGroup G]
theorem smul_convolution [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] {y : 𝕜} : y • f ⋆[L, μ] g = y • (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
ext; simp only [Pi.smul_apply, convolution_def, ← integral_smul, L.map_smul₂]
#align smul_convolution MeasureTheory.smul_convolution
theorem convolution_smul [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] {y : 𝕜} : f ⋆[L, μ] y • g = y • (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
ext; simp only [Pi.smul_apply, convolution_def, ← integral_smul, (L _).map_smul]
#align convolution_smul MeasureTheory.convolution_smul
@[simp]
theorem zero_convolution : 0 ⋆[L, μ] g = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [convolution_def, Pi.zero_apply, L.map_zero₂, integral_zero]
#align zero_convolution MeasureTheory.zero_convolution
@[simp]
theorem convolution_zero : f ⋆[L, μ] 0 = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [convolution_def, Pi.zero_apply, (L _).map_zero, integral_zero]
#align convolution_zero MeasureTheory.convolution_zero
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add {x : G} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x L μ) :
(f ⋆[L, μ] (g + g')) x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x + (f ⋆[L, μ] g') x := by
simp only [convolution_def, (L _).map_add, Pi.add_apply, integral_add hfg hfg']
#align convolution_exists_at.distrib_add MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add
theorem ConvolutionExists.distrib_add (hfg : ConvolutionExists f g L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExists f g' L μ) : f ⋆[L, μ] (g + g') = f ⋆[L, μ] g + f ⋆[L, μ] g' := by
ext x
exact (hfg x).distrib_add (hfg' x)
#align convolution_exists.distrib_add MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExists.distrib_add
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.add_distrib {x : G} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f' g x L μ) :
((f + f') ⋆[L, μ] g) x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x + (f' ⋆[L, μ] g) x := by
simp only [convolution_def, L.map_add₂, Pi.add_apply, integral_add hfg hfg']
#align convolution_exists_at.add_distrib MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.add_distrib
theorem ConvolutionExists.add_distrib (hfg : ConvolutionExists f g L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExists f' g L μ) : (f + f') ⋆[L, μ] g = f ⋆[L, μ] g + f' ⋆[L, μ] g := by
ext x
exact (hfg x).add_distrib (hfg' x)
#align convolution_exists.add_distrib MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExists.add_distrib
theorem convolution_mono_right {f g g' : G → ℝ} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ) (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ g' x) :
(f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x ≤ (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g') x := by
apply integral_mono hfg hfg'
simp only [lsmul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul]
intro t
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hg _) (hf _)
#align convolution_mono_right MeasureTheory.convolution_mono_right
theorem convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg {f g g' : G → ℝ}
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ) (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ g' x)
(hg' : ∀ x, 0 ≤ g' x) : (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x ≤ (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g') x := by
by_cases H : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ
· exact convolution_mono_right H hfg' hf hg
have : (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x = 0 := integral_undef H
rw [this]
exact integral_nonneg fun y => mul_nonneg (hf y) (hg' (x - y))
#align convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg
variable (L)
theorem convolution_congr [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite μ]
[IsAddRightInvariant μ] (h1 : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (h2 : g =ᵐ[μ] g') : f ⋆[L, μ] g = f' ⋆[L, μ] g' := by
ext x
apply integral_congr_ae
exact
(h1.prod_mk <|
h2.comp_tendsto
(quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x).tendsto_ae).fun_comp
↿fun x y => L x y
#align convolution_congr MeasureTheory.convolution_congr
theorem support_convolution_subset_swap : support (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ⊆ support g + support f := by
intro x h2x
by_contra hx
apply h2x
simp_rw [Set.mem_add, ← exists_and_left, not_exists, not_and_or, nmem_support] at hx
rw [convolution_def]
convert integral_zero G F using 2
ext t
rcases hx (x - t) t with (h | h | h)
· rw [h, (L _).map_zero]
· rw [h, L.map_zero₂]
· exact (h <| sub_add_cancel x t).elim
#align support_convolution_subset_swap MeasureTheory.support_convolution_subset_swap
section
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem Integrable.integrable_convolution (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable (f ⋆[L, μ] g) μ :=
(hf.convolution_integrand L hg).integral_prod_left
#align measure_theory.integrable.integrable_convolution MeasureTheory.Integrable.integrable_convolution
end
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
variable [TopologicalAddGroup G]
protected theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution [T2Space G] (hcf : HasCompactSupport f)
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) : HasCompactSupport (f ⋆[L, μ] g) :=
(hcg.isCompact.add hcf).of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure <|
closure_minimal
((support_convolution_subset_swap L).trans <| add_subset_add subset_closure subset_closure)
(hcg.isCompact.add hcf).isClosed
#align has_compact_support.convolution HasCompactSupport.convolution
variable [BorelSpace G] [TopologicalSpace P]
/-- The convolution `f * g` is continuous if `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous and
compactly supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in a subset `s` of
a parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`). -/
theorem continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param {g : P → G → E'} {s : Set P} {k : Set G}
(hk : IsCompact k) (hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContinuousOn (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) :
ContinuousOn (fun q : P × G => (f ⋆[L, μ] g q.1) q.2) (s ×ˢ univ) := by
/- First get rid of the case where the space is not locally compact. Then `g` vanishes everywhere
and the conclusion is trivial. -/
by_cases H : ∀ p ∈ s, ∀ x, g p x = 0
· apply (continuousOn_const (c := 0)).congr
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ ⟨hp, -⟩
apply integral_eq_zero_of_ae (eventually_of_forall (fun y ↦ ?_))
simp [H p hp _]
have : LocallyCompactSpace G := by
push_neg at H
rcases H with ⟨p, hp, x, hx⟩
have A : support (g p) ⊆ k := support_subset_iff'.2 (fun y hy ↦ hgs p y hp hy)
have B : Continuous (g p) := by
refine hg.comp_continuous (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id') fun x => ?_
simpa only [prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_true] using hp
rcases eq_zero_or_locallyCompactSpace_of_support_subset_isCompact_of_addGroup hk A B with H|H
· simp [H] at hx
· exact H
/- Since `G` is locally compact, one may thicken `k` a little bit into a larger compact set
`(-k) + t`, outside of which all functions that appear in the convolution vanish. Then we can
apply a continuity statement for integrals depending on a parameter, with respect to
locally integrable functions and compactly supported continuous functions. -/
rintro ⟨q₀, x₀⟩ ⟨hq₀, -⟩
obtain ⟨t, t_comp, ht⟩ : ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 x₀ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x₀
let k' : Set G := (-k) +ᵥ t
have k'_comp : IsCompact k' := IsCompact.vadd_set hk.neg t_comp
let g' : (P × G) → G → E' := fun p x ↦ g p.1 (p.2 - x)
let s' : Set (P × G) := s ×ˢ t
have A : ContinuousOn g'.uncurry (s' ×ˢ univ) := by
have : g'.uncurry = g.uncurry ∘ (fun w ↦ (w.1.1, w.1.2 - w.2)) := by ext y; rfl
rw [this]
refine hg.comp (continuous_fst.fst.prod_mk (continuous_fst.snd.sub
continuous_snd)).continuousOn ?_
simp (config := {contextual := true}) [s', MapsTo]
have B : ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ ∫ x, L (f x) (g' a x) ∂μ) s' := by
apply continuousOn_integral_bilinear_of_locally_integrable_of_compact_support L k'_comp A _
(hf.integrableOn_isCompact k'_comp)
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ y ⟨hp, hx⟩ hy
apply hgs p _ hp
contrapose! hy
exact ⟨y - x, by simpa using hy, x, hx, by simp⟩
apply ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem (B (q₀, x₀) ⟨hq₀, mem_of_mem_nhds ht⟩)
exact mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff.2 ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, t, nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht, Subset.rfl⟩
#align continuous_on_convolution_right_with_param' MeasureTheory.continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param
#align continuous_on_convolution_right_with_param MeasureTheory.continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param
/-- The convolution `f * g` is continuous if `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous and
compactly supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an open subset `s` of
a parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`),
given in terms of compositions with an additional continuous map. -/
theorem continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp {s : Set P} {v : P → G}
(hv : ContinuousOn v s) {g : P → G → E'} {k : Set G} (hk : IsCompact k)
(hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : ContinuousOn (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f ⋆[L, μ] g x) (v x)) s := by
apply
(continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param L hk hgs hf hg).comp (continuousOn_id.prod hv)
intro x hx
simp only [hx, prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_self_iff, _root_.id]
#align continuous_on_convolution_right_with_param_comp' MeasureTheory.continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp
#align continuous_on_convolution_right_with_param_comp MeasureTheory.continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp
/-- The convolution is continuous if one function is locally integrable and the other has compact
support and is continuous. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.continuous_convolution_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
let g' : G → G → E' := fun _ q => g q
have : ContinuousOn (↿g') (univ ×ˢ univ) := (hg.comp continuous_snd).continuousOn
exact continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp L
(continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ.1 continuous_id) hcg
(fun p x _ hx => image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx) hf this
#align has_compact_support.continuous_convolution_right HasCompactSupport.continuous_convolution_right
/-- The convolution is continuous if one function is integrable and the other is bounded and
continuous. -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.continuous_convolution_right_of_integrable
[FirstCountableTopology G] [SecondCountableTopologyEither G E']
(hbg : BddAbove (range fun x => ‖g x‖)) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x₀ => ?_
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ t : G ∂μ, ‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖ := by
filter_upwards with x; filter_upwards with t
apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl, le_ciSup hbg (x - t)]
refine continuousAt_of_dominated ?_ this ?_ ?_
· exact eventually_of_forall fun x =>
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd' L hg.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact (hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· exact eventually_of_forall fun t => (L.continuous₂.comp₂ continuous_const <|
hg.comp <| continuous_id.sub continuous_const).continuousAt
#align bdd_above.continuous_convolution_right_of_integrable BddAbove.continuous_convolution_right_of_integrable
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G]
theorem support_convolution_subset : support (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ⊆ support f + support g :=
(support_convolution_subset_swap L).trans (add_comm _ _).subset
#align support_convolution_subset MeasureTheory.support_convolution_subset
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [IsNegInvariant μ]
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableNeg G]
variable [MeasurableAdd G]
/-- Commutativity of convolution -/
theorem convolution_flip : g ⋆[L.flip, μ] f = f ⋆[L, μ] g := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [convolution_def]
rw [← integral_sub_left_eq_self _ μ x]
simp_rw [sub_sub_self, flip_apply]
#align convolution_flip MeasureTheory.convolution_flip
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution. -/
theorem convolution_eq_swap : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f (x - t)) (g t) ∂μ := by
rw [← convolution_flip]; rfl
#align convolution_eq_swap MeasureTheory.convolution_eq_swap
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is scalar multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_lsmul_swap {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → F} :
(f ⋆[lsmul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g : G → F) x = ∫ t, f (x - t) • g t ∂μ :=
convolution_eq_swap _
#align convolution_lsmul_swap MeasureTheory.convolution_lsmul_swap
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_mul_swap [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → 𝕜} :
(f ⋆[mul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g) x = ∫ t, f (x - t) * g t ∂μ :=
convolution_eq_swap _
#align convolution_mul_swap MeasureTheory.convolution_mul_swap
/-- The convolution of two even functions is also even. -/
theorem convolution_neg_of_neg_eq (h1 : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f (-x) = f x) (h2 : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g (-x) = g x) :
(f ⋆[L, μ] g) (-x) = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x :=
calc
∫ t : G, (L (f t)) (g (-x - t)) ∂μ = ∫ t : G, (L (f (-t))) (g (x + t)) ∂μ := by
apply integral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h1, (eventually_add_left_iff μ x).2 h2] with t ht h't
simp_rw [ht, ← h't, neg_add']
_ = ∫ t : G, (L (f t)) (g (x - t)) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_neg_eq_self]
simp only [neg_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align convolution_neg_of_neg_eq MeasureTheory.convolution_neg_of_neg_eq
end Measurable
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
variable [TopologicalAddGroup G]
variable [BorelSpace G]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.continuous_convolution_left
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [← convolution_flip]
exact hcf.continuous_convolution_right L.flip hg hf
#align has_compact_support.continuous_convolution_left HasCompactSupport.continuous_convolution_left
theorem _root_.BddAbove.continuous_convolution_left_of_integrable
[FirstCountableTopology G] [SecondCountableTopologyEither G E]
(hbf : BddAbove (range fun x => ‖f x‖)) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [← convolution_flip]
exact hbf.continuous_convolution_right_of_integrable L.flip hg hf
#align bdd_above.continuous_convolution_left_of_integrable BddAbove.continuous_convolution_left_of_integrable
end CommGroup
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup G]
/-- Compute `(f ⋆ g) x₀` if the support of the `f` is within `Metric.ball 0 R`, and `g` is constant
on `Metric.ball x₀ R`.
We can simplify the RHS further if we assume `f` is integrable, but also if `L = (•)` or more
generally if `L` has an `AntilipschitzWith`-condition. -/
theorem convolution_eq_right' {x₀ : G} {R : ℝ} (hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, g x = g x₀) : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x₀ = ∫ t, L (f t) (g x₀) ∂μ := by
have h2 : ∀ t, L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)) = L (f t) (g x₀) := fun t ↦ by
by_cases ht : t ∈ support f
· have h2t := hf ht
rw [mem_ball_zero_iff] at h2t
specialize hg (x₀ - t)
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hg
rw [hg h2t]
· rw [nmem_support] at ht
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
simp_rw [convolution_def, h2]
#align convolution_eq_right' MeasureTheory.convolution_eq_right'
variable [BorelSpace G] [SecondCountableTopology G]
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [SigmaFinite μ]
/-- Approximate `(f ⋆ g) x₀` if the support of the `f` is bounded within a ball, and `g` is near
`g x₀` on a ball with the same radius around `x₀`. See `dist_convolution_le` for a special case.
We can simplify the second argument of `dist` further if we add some extra type-classes on `E`
and `𝕜` or if `L` is scalar multiplication. -/
theorem dist_convolution_le' {x₀ : G} {R ε : ℝ} {z₀ : E'} (hε : 0 ≤ ε) (hif : Integrable f μ)
(hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, dist (g x) z₀ ≤ ε) :
dist ((f ⋆[L, μ] g : G → F) x₀) (∫ t, L (f t) z₀ ∂μ) ≤ (‖L‖ * ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) * ε := by
have hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ Metric.isOpen_ball.measurableSet (Subset.trans ?_ hf)
hif.integrableOn hmg
swap; · refine fun t => mt fun ht : f t = 0 => ?_; simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
rw [bddAbove_def]
refine ⟨‖z₀‖ + ε, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
refine norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le (hg x ?_)
rwa [mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_sub_rev, ← mem_ball_zero_iff]
have h2 : ∀ t, dist (L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) (L (f t) z₀) ≤ ‖L (f t)‖ * ε := by
intro t; by_cases ht : t ∈ support f
· have h2t := hf ht
rw [mem_ball_zero_iff] at h2t
specialize hg (x₀ - t)
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hg
refine ((L (f t)).dist_le_opNorm _ _).trans ?_
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hg h2t) (norm_nonneg _)
· rw [nmem_support] at ht
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂, L.map_zero, norm_zero, zero_mul, dist_self]
rfl
simp_rw [convolution_def]
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm] at h2 ⊢
rw [← integral_sub hfg.integrable]; swap; · exact (L.flip z₀).integrable_comp hif
refine (norm_integral_le_of_norm_le ((L.integrable_comp hif).norm.mul_const ε)
(eventually_of_forall h2)).trans ?_
rw [integral_mul_right]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ hε
have h3 : ∀ t, ‖L (f t)‖ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ := by
intro t
exact L.le_opNorm (f t)
refine (integral_mono (L.integrable_comp hif).norm (hif.norm.const_mul _) h3).trans_eq ?_
rw [integral_mul_left]
#align dist_convolution_le' MeasureTheory.dist_convolution_le'
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [CompleteSpace E']
/-- Approximate `f ⋆ g` if the support of the `f` is bounded within a ball, and `g` is near `g x₀`
on a ball with the same radius around `x₀`.
This is a special case of `dist_convolution_le'` where `L` is `(•)`, `f` has integral 1 and `f` is
nonnegative. -/
theorem dist_convolution_le {f : G → ℝ} {x₀ : G} {R ε : ℝ} {z₀ : E'} (hε : 0 ≤ ε)
(hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R) (hnf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hintf : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 1)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, dist (g x) z₀ ≤ ε) :
dist ((f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g : G → E') x₀) z₀ ≤ ε := by
have hif : Integrable f μ := integrable_of_integral_eq_one hintf
convert (dist_convolution_le' (lsmul ℝ ℝ) hε hif hf hmg hg).trans _
· simp_rw [lsmul_apply, integral_smul_const, hintf, one_smul]
· simp_rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (hnf _), hintf, mul_one]
exact (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right opNorm_lsmul_le hε).trans_eq (one_mul ε)
#align dist_convolution_le MeasureTheory.dist_convolution_le
/-- `(φ i ⋆ g i) (k i)` tends to `z₀` as `i` tends to some filter `l` if
* `φ` is a sequence of nonnegative functions with integral `1` as `i` tends to `l`;
* The support of `φ` tends to small neighborhoods around `(0 : G)` as `i` tends to `l`;
* `g i` is `mu`-a.e. strongly measurable as `i` tends to `l`;
* `g i x` tends to `z₀` as `(i, x)` tends to `l ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀`;
* `k i` tends to `x₀`.
See also `ContDiffBump.convolution_tendsto_right`.
-/
theorem convolution_tendsto_right {ι} {g : ι → G → E'} {l : Filter ι} {x₀ : G} {z₀ : E'}
{φ : ι → G → ℝ} {k : ι → G} (hnφ : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∀ x, 0 ≤ φ i x)
(hiφ : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∫ x, φ i x ∂μ = 1)
-- todo: we could weaken this to "the integral tends to 1"
(hφ : Tendsto (fun n => support (φ n)) l (𝓝 0).smallSets)
(hmg : ∀ᶠ i in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) (hcg : Tendsto (uncurry g) (l ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀) (𝓝 z₀))
(hk : Tendsto k l (𝓝 x₀)) :
Tendsto (fun i : ι => (φ i ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g i : G → E') (k i)) l (𝓝 z₀) := by
simp_rw [tendsto_smallSets_iff] at hφ
rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds] at hcg ⊢
simp_rw [Metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff] at hcg
intro ε hε
have h2ε : 0 < ε / 3 := div_pos hε (by norm_num)
obtain ⟨p, hp, δ, hδ, hgδ⟩ := hcg _ h2ε
dsimp only [uncurry] at hgδ
have h2k := hk.eventually (ball_mem_nhds x₀ <| half_pos hδ)
have h2φ := hφ (ball (0 : G) _) <| ball_mem_nhds _ (half_pos hδ)
filter_upwards [hp, h2k, h2φ, hnφ, hiφ, hmg] with i hpi hki hφi hnφi hiφi hmgi
have hgi : dist (g i (k i)) z₀ < ε / 3 := hgδ hpi (hki.trans <| half_lt_self hδ)
have h1 : ∀ x' ∈ ball (k i) (δ / 2), dist (g i x') (g i (k i)) ≤ ε / 3 + ε / 3 := by
intro x' hx'
refine (dist_triangle_right _ _ _).trans (add_le_add (hgδ hpi ?_).le hgi.le)
exact ((dist_triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hx'.out hki)).trans_eq (add_halves δ)
have := dist_convolution_le (add_pos h2ε h2ε).le hφi hnφi hiφi hmgi h1
refine ((dist_triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt this hgi)).trans_eq ?_
field_simp; ring_nf
#align convolution_tendsto_right MeasureTheory.convolution_tendsto_right
end NormedAddCommGroup
end Measurability
end NontriviallyNormedField
open scoped Convolution
section RCLike
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {n : ℕ∞}
variable [CompleteSpace F]
variable [MeasurableSpace G] {μ ν : Measure G}
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
section Assoc
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [CompleteSpace F']
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F''] [NormedSpace ℝ F''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F''] [CompleteSpace F'']
variable {k : G → E''}
variable (L₂ : F →L[𝕜] E'' →L[𝕜] F')
variable (L₃ : E →L[𝕜] F'' →L[𝕜] F')
variable (L₄ : E' →L[𝕜] E'' →L[𝕜] F'')
variable [AddGroup G]
variable [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem integral_convolution [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E'] [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace E'] (hf : Integrable f ν)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : ∫ x, (f ⋆[L, ν] g) x ∂μ = L (∫ x, f x ∂ν) (∫ x, g x ∂μ) := by
refine (integral_integral_swap (by apply hf.convolution_integrand L hg)).trans ?_
simp_rw [integral_comp_comm _ (hg.comp_sub_right _), integral_sub_right_eq_self]
exact (L.flip (∫ x, g x ∂μ)).integral_comp_comm hf
#align integral_convolution MeasureTheory.integral_convolution
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [IsAddRightInvariant ν] [MeasurableNeg G]
/-- Convolution is associative. This has a weak but inconvenient integrability condition.
See also `convolution_assoc`. -/
theorem convolution_assoc' (hL : ∀ (x : E) (y : E') (z : E''), L₂ (L x y) z = L₃ x (L₄ y z))
{x₀ : G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ y ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g y L ν)
(hgk : ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, ConvolutionExistsAt g k x L₄ μ)
(hi : Integrable (uncurry fun x y => (L₃ (f y)) ((L₄ (g (x - y))) (k (x₀ - x)))) (μ.prod ν)) :
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ :=
calc
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = ∫ t, L₂ (∫ s, L (f s) (g (t - s)) ∂ν) (k (x₀ - t)) ∂μ := rfl
_ = ∫ t, ∫ s, L₂ (L (f s) (g (t - s))) (k (x₀ - t)) ∂ν ∂μ :=
(integral_congr_ae (hfg.mono fun t ht => ((L₂.flip (k (x₀ - t))).integral_comp_comm ht).symm))
_ = ∫ t, ∫ s, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g (t - s)) (k (x₀ - t))) ∂ν ∂μ := by simp_rw [hL]
_ = ∫ s, ∫ t, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g (t - s)) (k (x₀ - t))) ∂μ ∂ν := by rw [integral_integral_swap hi]
_ = ∫ s, ∫ u, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g u) (k (x₀ - s - u))) ∂μ ∂ν := by
congr; ext t
rw [eq_comm, ← integral_sub_right_eq_self _ t]
simp_rw [sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
_ = ∫ s, L₃ (f s) (∫ u, L₄ (g u) (k (x₀ - s - u)) ∂μ) ∂ν := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
refine ((quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant ν x₀).ae hgk).mono fun t ht => ?_
exact (L₃ (f t)).integral_comp_comm ht
_ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ := rfl
#align convolution_assoc' MeasureTheory.convolution_assoc'
/-- Convolution is associative. This requires that
* all maps are a.e. strongly measurable w.r.t one of the measures
* `f ⋆[L, ν] g` exists almost everywhere
* `‖g‖ ⋆[μ] ‖k‖` exists almost everywhere
* `‖f‖ ⋆[ν] (‖g‖ ⋆[μ] ‖k‖)` exists at `x₀` -/
theorem convolution_assoc (hL : ∀ (x : E) (y : E') (z : E''), L₂ (L x y) z = L₃ x (L₄ y z)) {x₀ : G}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (hk : AEStronglyMeasurable k μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ y ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g y L ν)
(hgk : ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖g x‖) (fun x => ‖k x‖) x (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hfgk :
ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) ((fun x => ‖g x‖) ⋆[mul ℝ ℝ, μ] fun x => ‖k x‖) x₀
(mul ℝ ℝ) ν) :
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ := by
refine convolution_assoc' L L₂ L₃ L₄ hL hfg (hgk.mono fun x hx => hx.ofNorm L₄ hg hk) ?_
-- the following is similar to `Integrable.convolution_integrand`
have h_meas :
AEStronglyMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x))))
(μ.prod ν) := by
refine L₃.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf.snd ?_
refine L₄.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hg.fst ?_
refine (hk.mono_ac ?_).comp_measurable
((measurable_const.sub measurable_snd).sub measurable_fst)
refine QuasiMeasurePreserving.absolutelyContinuous ?_
refine QuasiMeasurePreserving.prod_of_left
((measurable_const.sub measurable_snd).sub measurable_fst) (eventually_of_forall fun y => ?_)
dsimp only
exact quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ _
have h2_meas :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y => ∫ x, ‖L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x)))‖ ∂μ) ν :=
h_meas.prod_swap.norm.integral_prod_right'
have h3 : map (fun z : G × G => (z.1 - z.2, z.2)) (μ.prod ν) = μ.prod ν :=
(measurePreserving_sub_prod μ ν).map_eq
suffices Integrable (uncurry fun x y => L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x)))) (μ.prod ν) by
rw [← h3] at this
convert this.comp_measurable (measurable_sub.prod_mk measurable_snd)
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [uncurry, Function.comp_apply,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
simp_rw [integrable_prod_iff' h_meas]
refine ⟨((quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant ν x₀).ae hgk).mono fun t ht =>
(L₃ (f t)).integrable_comp <| ht.ofNorm L₄ hg hk, ?_⟩
refine (hfgk.const_mul (‖L₃‖ * ‖L₄‖)).mono' h2_meas
(((quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant ν x₀).ae hgk).mono fun t ht => ?_)
simp_rw [convolution_def, mul_apply', mul_mul_mul_comm ‖L₃‖ ‖L₄‖, ← integral_mul_left]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
refine integral_mono_of_nonneg (eventually_of_forall fun t => norm_nonneg _)
((ht.const_mul _).const_mul _) (eventually_of_forall fun s => ?_)
simp only [← mul_assoc ‖L₄‖]
apply_rules [ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
#align convolution_assoc MeasureTheory.convolution_assoc
end Assoc
variable [NormedAddCommGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
theorem convolution_precompR_apply {g : G → E'' →L[𝕜] E'} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) (hg : Continuous g) (x₀ : G) (x : E'') :
(f ⋆[L.precompR E'', μ] g) x₀ x = (f ⋆[L, μ] fun a => g a x) x₀ := by
have := hcg.convolutionExists_right (L.precompR E'' : _) hf hg x₀
simp_rw [convolution_def, ContinuousLinearMap.integral_apply this]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align convolution_precompR_apply MeasureTheory.convolution_precompR_apply
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SigmaFinite μ] [IsAddLeftInvariant μ]
/-- Compute the total derivative of `f ⋆ g` if `g` is `C^1` with compact support and `f` is locally
integrable. To write down the total derivative as a convolution, we use
`ContinuousLinearMap.precompR`. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 1 g) (x₀ : G) :
HasFDerivAt (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ((f ⋆[L.precompR G, μ] fderiv 𝕜 g) x₀) x₀ := by
rcases hcg.eq_zero_or_finiteDimensional 𝕜 hg.continuous with (rfl | fin_dim)
· have : fderiv 𝕜 (0 : G → E') = 0 := fderiv_const (0 : E')
simp only [this, convolution_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
exact hasFDerivAt_const (0 : F) x₀
have : ProperSpace G := FiniteDimensional.proper_rclike 𝕜 G
set L' := L.precompR G
have h1 : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
eventually_of_forall
(hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd L hg.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable)
have h2 : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L' (f t) (fderiv 𝕜 g (x - t))) μ :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd L'
(hg.continuous_fderiv le_rfl).aestronglyMeasurable
have h3 : ∀ x t, HasFDerivAt (fun x => g (x - t)) (fderiv 𝕜 g (x - t)) x := fun x t ↦ by
simpa using
(hg.differentiable le_rfl).differentiableAt.hasFDerivAt.comp x
((hasFDerivAt_id x).sub (hasFDerivAt_const t x))
let K' := -tsupport (fderiv 𝕜 g) + closedBall x₀ 1
have hK' : IsCompact K' := (hcg.fderiv 𝕜).neg.add (isCompact_closedBall x₀ 1)
-- Porting note: was
-- `refine' hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le zero_lt_one h1 _ (h2 x₀) _ _ _`
-- but it failed; surprisingly, `apply` works
apply hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le zero_lt_one h1 _ (h2 x₀)
· filter_upwards with t x hx using
(hcg.fderiv 𝕜).convolution_integrand_bound_right L' (hg.continuous_fderiv le_rfl)
(ball_subset_closedBall hx)
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK'.measurableSet]
exact ((hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK').norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· exact eventually_of_forall fun t x _ => (L _).hasFDerivAt.comp x (h3 x t)
· exact hcg.convolutionExists_right L hf hg.continuous x₀
#align has_compact_support.has_fderiv_at_convolution_right HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_left [IsNegInvariant μ]
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 1 f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) (x₀ : G) :
HasFDerivAt (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ((fderiv 𝕜 f ⋆[L.precompL G, μ] g) x₀) x₀ := by
simp (config := { singlePass := true }) only [← convolution_flip]
exact hcf.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right L.flip hg hf x₀
#align has_compact_support.has_fderiv_at_convolution_left HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_left
end RCLike
section Real
/-! The one-variable case -/
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f₀ : 𝕜 → E} {g₀ : 𝕜 → E'}
variable {n : ℕ∞}
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
variable [CompleteSpace F]
variable {μ : Measure 𝕜}
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [SigmaFinite μ]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.hasDerivAt_convolution_right (hf : LocallyIntegrable f₀ μ)
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g₀) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 1 g₀) (x₀ : 𝕜) :
HasDerivAt (f₀ ⋆[L, μ] g₀) ((f₀ ⋆[L, μ] deriv g₀) x₀) x₀ := by
convert (hcg.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right L hf hg x₀).hasDerivAt using 1
rw [convolution_precompR_apply L hf (hcg.fderiv 𝕜) (hg.continuous_fderiv le_rfl)]
rfl
#align has_compact_support.has_deriv_at_convolution_right HasCompactSupport.hasDerivAt_convolution_right
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convolution.lean | 1,086 | 1,090 | theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.hasDerivAt_convolution_left [IsNegInvariant μ]
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f₀) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 1 f₀) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g₀ μ) (x₀ : 𝕜) :
HasDerivAt (f₀ ⋆[L, μ] g₀) ((deriv f₀ ⋆[L, μ] g₀) x₀) x₀ := by |
simp (config := { singlePass := true }) only [← convolution_flip]
exact hcf.hasDerivAt_convolution_right L.flip hg hf x₀
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
/-!
# Oriented angles in right-angled triangles.
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and oriented angles in (possibly
degenerate) right-angled triangles in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open FiniteDimensional
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 351 | 354 | theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by |
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.UnitInterval
#align_import topology.path_connected from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Path connectedness
## Main definitions
In the file the unit interval `[0, 1]` in `ℝ` is denoted by `I`, and `X` is a topological space.
* `Path (x y : X)` is the type of paths from `x` to `y`, i.e., continuous maps from `I` to `X`
mapping `0` to `x` and `1` to `y`.
* `Path.map` is the image of a path under a continuous map.
* `Joined (x y : X)` means there is a path between `x` and `y`.
* `Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y)` selects some path between two points `x` and `y`.
* `pathComponent (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x`.
* `PathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is non-empty and every two
points of `X` are joined.
Then there are corresponding relative notions for `F : Set X`.
* `JoinedIn F (x y : X)` means there is a path `γ` joining `x` to `y` with values in `F`.
* `JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y)` selects a path from `x` to `y` inside `F`.
* `pathComponentIn F (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x` in `F`.
* `IsPathConnected F` asserts that `F` is non-empty and every two
points of `F` are joined in `F`.
* `LocPathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is locally path-connected:
each point has a basis of path-connected neighborhoods (we do *not* ask these to be open).
## Main theorems
* `Joined` and `JoinedIn F` are transitive relations.
One can link the absolute and relative version in two directions, using `(univ : Set X)` or the
subtype `↥F`.
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X)`
* `isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace ↥F`
For locally path connected spaces, we have
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_connectedSpace : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ ConnectedSpace X`
* `IsOpen.isConnected_iff_isPathConnected (U_op : IsOpen U) : IsPathConnected U ↔ IsConnected U`
## Implementation notes
By default, all paths have `I` as their source and `X` as their target, but there is an
operation `Set.IccExtend` that will extend any continuous map `γ : I → X` into a continuous map
`IccExtend zero_le_one γ : ℝ → X` that is constant before `0` and after `1`.
This is used to define `Path.extend` that turns `γ : Path x y` into a continuous map
`γ.extend : ℝ → X` whose restriction to `I` is the original `γ`, and is equal to `x`
on `(-∞, 0]` and to `y` on `[1, +∞)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter unitInterval Set Function
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {x y z : X} {ι : Type*}
/-! ### Paths -/
/-- Continuous path connecting two points `x` and `y` in a topological space -/
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure Path (x y : X) extends C(I, X) where
/-- The start point of a `Path`. -/
source' : toFun 0 = x
/-- The end point of a `Path`. -/
target' : toFun 1 = y
#align path Path
instance Path.funLike : FunLike (Path x y) I X where
coe := fun γ ↦ ⇑γ.toContinuousMap
coe_injective' := fun γ₁ γ₂ h => by
simp only [DFunLike.coe_fn_eq] at h
cases γ₁; cases γ₂; congr
-- Porting note (#10754): added this instance so that we can use `FunLike.coe` for `CoeFun`
-- this also fixed very strange `simp` timeout issues
instance Path.continuousMapClass : ContinuousMapClass (Path x y) I X where
map_continuous := fun γ => show Continuous γ.toContinuousMap by continuity
-- Porting note: not necessary in light of the instance above
/-
instance : CoeFun (Path x y) fun _ => I → X :=
⟨fun p => p.toFun⟩
-/
@[ext]
protected theorem Path.ext : ∀ {γ₁ γ₂ : Path x y}, (γ₁ : I → X) = γ₂ → γ₁ = γ₂ := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, h11⟩, h12, h13⟩ ⟨⟨x, h21⟩, h22, h23⟩ rfl
rfl
#align path.ext Path.ext
namespace Path
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk_mk (f : I → X) (h₁) (h₂ : f 0 = x) (h₃ : f 1 = y) :
⇑(mk ⟨f, h₁⟩ h₂ h₃ : Path x y) = f :=
rfl
#align path.coe_mk Path.coe_mk_mk
-- Porting note: the name `Path.coe_mk` better refers to a new lemma below
variable (γ : Path x y)
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous γ :=
γ.continuous_toFun
#align path.continuous Path.continuous
@[simp]
protected theorem source : γ 0 = x :=
γ.source'
#align path.source Path.source
@[simp]
protected theorem target : γ 1 = y :=
γ.target'
#align path.target Path.target
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def simps.apply : I → X :=
γ
#align path.simps.apply Path.simps.apply
initialize_simps_projections Path (toFun → simps.apply, -toContinuousMap)
@[simp]
theorem coe_toContinuousMap : ⇑γ.toContinuousMap = γ :=
rfl
#align path.coe_to_continuous_map Path.coe_toContinuousMap
-- Porting note: this is needed because of the `Path.continuousMapClass` instance
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk : ⇑(γ : C(I, X)) = γ :=
rfl
/-- Any function `φ : Π (a : α), Path (x a) (y a)` can be seen as a function `α × I → X`. -/
instance hasUncurryPath {X α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {x y : α → X} :
HasUncurry (∀ a : α, Path (x a) (y a)) (α × I) X :=
⟨fun φ p => φ p.1 p.2⟩
#align path.has_uncurry_path Path.hasUncurryPath
/-- The constant path from a point to itself -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (x : X) : Path x x where
toFun _t := x
continuous_toFun := continuous_const
source' := rfl
target' := rfl
#align path.refl Path.refl
@[simp]
theorem refl_range {a : X} : range (Path.refl a) = {a} := by simp [Path.refl, CoeFun.coe]
#align path.refl_range Path.refl_range
/-- The reverse of a path from `x` to `y`, as a path from `y` to `x` -/
@[symm, simps]
def symm (γ : Path x y) : Path y x where
toFun := γ ∘ σ
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simpa [-Path.target] using γ.target
target' := by simpa [-Path.source] using γ.source
#align path.symm Path.symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (γ : Path x y) : γ.symm.symm = γ := by
ext t
show γ (σ (σ t)) = γ t
rw [unitInterval.symm_symm]
#align path.symm_symm Path.symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (Path.symm : Path x y → Path y x) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm {a : X} : (Path.refl a).symm = Path.refl a := by
ext
rfl
#align path.refl_symm Path.refl_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) : range γ.symm = range γ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_range, Path.symm, DFunLike.coe, unitInterval.symm, SetCoe.exists, comp_apply,
Subtype.coe_mk]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩ <;> refine ⟨1 - y, mem_iff_one_sub_mem.mp hy, ?_⟩ <;>
convert hxy
simp
#align path.symm_range Path.symm_range
/-! #### Space of paths -/
open ContinuousMap
/- porting note: because of the `DFunLike` instance, we already have a coercion to `C(I, X)`
so we avoid adding another.
--instance : Coe (Path x y) C(I, X) :=
--⟨fun γ => γ.1⟩
-/
/-- The following instance defines the topology on the path space to be induced from the
compact-open topology on the space `C(I,X)` of continuous maps from `I` to `X`.
-/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (Path x y) :=
TopologicalSpace.induced ((↑) : _ → C(I, X)) ContinuousMap.compactOpen
theorem continuous_eval : Continuous fun p : Path x y × I => p.1 p.2 :=
continuous_eval.comp <| (continuous_induced_dom (α := Path x y)).prod_map continuous_id
#align path.continuous_eval Path.continuous_eval
@[continuity]
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_eval {Y} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → Path x y} {g : Y → I}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun y => f y (g y) :=
Continuous.comp continuous_eval (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align continuous.path_eval Continuous.path_eval
theorem continuous_uncurry_iff {Y} [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : Y → Path x y} :
Continuous ↿g ↔ Continuous g :=
Iff.symm <| continuous_induced_rng.trans
⟨fun h => continuous_uncurry_of_continuous ⟨_, h⟩,
continuous_of_continuous_uncurry (fun (y : Y) ↦ ContinuousMap.mk (g y))⟩
#align path.continuous_uncurry_iff Path.continuous_uncurry_iff
/-- A continuous map extending a path to `ℝ`, constant before `0` and after `1`. -/
def extend : ℝ → X :=
IccExtend zero_le_one γ
#align path.extend Path.extend
/-- See Note [continuity lemma statement]. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_extend {γ : Y → Path x y} {f : Y → ℝ} (hγ : Continuous ↿γ)
(hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun t => (γ t).extend (f t) :=
Continuous.IccExtend hγ hf
#align continuous.path_extend Continuous.path_extend
/-- A useful special case of `Continuous.path_extend`. -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_extend : Continuous γ.extend :=
γ.continuous.Icc_extend'
#align path.continuous_extend Path.continuous_extend
theorem _root_.Filter.Tendsto.path_extend
{l r : Y → X} {y : Y} {l₁ : Filter ℝ} {l₂ : Filter X} {γ : ∀ y, Path (l y) (r y)}
(hγ : Tendsto (↿γ) (𝓝 y ×ˢ l₁.map (projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one)) l₂) :
Tendsto (↿fun x => (γ x).extend) (𝓝 y ×ˢ l₁) l₂ :=
Filter.Tendsto.IccExtend _ hγ
#align filter.tendsto.path_extend Filter.Tendsto.path_extend
theorem _root_.ContinuousAt.path_extend {g : Y → ℝ} {l r : Y → X} (γ : ∀ y, Path (l y) (r y))
{y : Y} (hγ : ContinuousAt (↿γ) (y, projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one (g y))) (hg : ContinuousAt g y) :
ContinuousAt (fun i => (γ i).extend (g i)) y :=
hγ.IccExtend (fun x => γ x) hg
#align continuous_at.path_extend ContinuousAt.path_extend
@[simp]
theorem extend_extends {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : t ∈ (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ)) : γ.extend t = γ ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
IccExtend_of_mem _ γ ht
#align path.extend_extends Path.extend_extends
theorem extend_zero : γ.extend 0 = x := by simp
#align path.extend_zero Path.extend_zero
theorem extend_one : γ.extend 1 = y := by simp
#align path.extend_one Path.extend_one
@[simp]
theorem extend_extends' {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t : (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ)) : γ.extend t = γ t :=
IccExtend_val _ γ t
#align path.extend_extends' Path.extend_extends'
@[simp]
theorem extend_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
range γ.extend = range γ :=
IccExtend_range _ γ
#align path.extend_range Path.extend_range
theorem extend_of_le_zero {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : γ.extend t = a :=
(IccExtend_of_le_left _ _ ht).trans γ.source
#align path.extend_of_le_zero Path.extend_of_le_zero
theorem extend_of_one_le {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : 1 ≤ t) : γ.extend t = b :=
(IccExtend_of_right_le _ _ ht).trans γ.target
#align path.extend_of_one_le Path.extend_of_one_le
@[simp]
theorem refl_extend {a : X} : (Path.refl a).extend = fun _ => a :=
rfl
#align path.refl_extend Path.refl_extend
/-- The path obtained from a map defined on `ℝ` by restriction to the unit interval. -/
def ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y) : Path x y where
toFun := f ∘ ((↑) : unitInterval → ℝ)
continuous_toFun := hf.comp_continuous continuous_subtype_val Subtype.prop
source' := h₀
target' := h₁
#align path.of_line Path.ofLine
theorem ofLine_mem {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y) :
∀ t, ofLine hf h₀ h₁ t ∈ f '' I := fun ⟨t, t_in⟩ => ⟨t, t_in, rfl⟩
#align path.of_line_mem Path.ofLine_mem
attribute [local simp] Iic_def
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
/-- Concatenation of two paths from `x` to `y` and from `y` to `z`, putting the first
path on `[0, 1/2]` and the second one on `[1/2, 1]`. -/
@[trans]
def trans (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) : Path x z where
toFun := (fun t : ℝ => if t ≤ 1 / 2 then γ.extend (2 * t) else γ'.extend (2 * t - 1)) ∘ (↑)
continuous_toFun := by
refine
(Continuous.if_le ?_ ?_ continuous_id continuous_const (by norm_num)).comp
continuous_subtype_val <;>
continuity
source' := by norm_num
target' := by norm_num
#align path.trans Path.trans
theorem trans_apply (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) (t : I) :
(γ.trans γ') t =
if h : (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then γ ⟨2 * t, (mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two).2 ⟨t.2.1, h⟩⟩
else γ' ⟨2 * t - 1, two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff.2 ⟨(not_le.1 h).le, t.2.2⟩⟩ :=
show ite _ _ _ = _ by split_ifs <;> rw [extend_extends]
#align path.trans_apply Path.trans_apply
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) : (γ.trans γ').symm = γ'.symm.trans γ.symm := by
ext t
simp only [trans_apply, ← one_div, symm_apply, not_le, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h h₁ h₂ <;> rw [coe_symm_eq] at h
· have ht : (t : ℝ) = 1 / 2 := by linarith
norm_num [ht]
· refine congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext ?_)
norm_num [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, mul_sub]
· refine congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext ?_)
norm_num [mul_sub, h]
ring -- TODO norm_num should really do this
· exfalso
linarith
#align path.trans_symm Path.trans_symm
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans_refl {a : X} :
(Path.refl a).trans (Path.refl a) = Path.refl a := by
ext
simp only [Path.trans, ite_self, one_div, Path.refl_extend]
rfl
#align path.refl_trans_refl Path.refl_trans_refl
theorem trans_range {a b c : X} (γ₁ : Path a b) (γ₂ : Path b c) :
range (γ₁.trans γ₂) = range γ₁ ∪ range γ₂ := by
rw [Path.trans]
apply eq_of_subset_of_subset
· rintro x ⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩
by_cases h : t ≤ 1 / 2
· left
use ⟨2 * t, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [← γ₁.extend_extends]
rwa [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos h] at hxt
· right
use ⟨2 * t - 1, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [← γ₂.extend_extends]
rwa [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_neg h] at hxt
· rintro x (⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩ | ⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩)
· use ⟨t / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
have : t / 2 ≤ 1 / 2 := (div_le_div_right (zero_lt_two : (0 : ℝ) < 2)).mpr ht1
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos this, Subtype.coe_mk]
ring_nf
rwa [γ₁.extend_extends]
· by_cases h : t = 0
· use ⟨1 / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos le_rfl, Subtype.coe_mk,
mul_one_div_cancel (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
rw [γ₁.extend_one]
rwa [← γ₂.extend_extends, h, γ₂.extend_zero] at hxt
· use ⟨(t + 1) / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
replace h : t ≠ 0 := h
have ht0 := lt_of_le_of_ne ht0 h.symm
have : ¬(t + 1) / 2 ≤ 1 / 2 := by
rw [not_le]
linarith
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, if_neg this]
ring_nf
rwa [γ₂.extend_extends]
#align path.trans_range Path.trans_range
/-- Image of a path from `x` to `y` by a map which is continuous on the path. -/
def map' (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : ContinuousOn f (range γ)) : Path (f x) (f y) where
toFun := f ∘ γ
continuous_toFun := h.comp_continuous γ.continuous (fun x ↦ mem_range_self x)
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
/-- Image of a path from `x` to `y` by a continuous map -/
def map (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Path (f x) (f y) := γ.map' h.continuousOn
#align path.map Path.map
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
(γ.map h : I → Y) = f ∘ γ := by
ext t
rfl
#align path.map_coe Path.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_symm (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
(γ.map h).symm = γ.symm.map h :=
rfl
#align path.map_symm Path.map_symm
@[simp]
theorem map_trans (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) {f : X → Y}
(h : Continuous f) : (γ.trans γ').map h = (γ.map h).trans (γ'.map h) := by
ext t
rw [trans_apply, map_coe, Function.comp_apply, trans_apply]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align path.map_trans Path.map_trans
@[simp]
theorem map_id (γ : Path x y) : γ.map continuous_id = γ := by
ext
rfl
#align path.map_id Path.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_map (γ : Path x y) {Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Z]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {g : Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) :
(γ.map hf).map hg = γ.map (hg.comp hf) := by
ext
rfl
#align path.map_map Path.map_map
/-- Casting a path from `x` to `y` to a path from `x'` to `y'` when `x' = x` and `y' = y` -/
def cast (γ : Path x y) {x' y'} (hx : x' = x) (hy : y' = y) : Path x' y' where
toFun := γ
continuous_toFun := γ.continuous
source' := by simp [hx]
target' := by simp [hy]
#align path.cast Path.cast
@[simp]
theorem symm_cast {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : X} (γ : Path a₂ b₂) (ha : a₁ = a₂) (hb : b₁ = b₂) :
(γ.cast ha hb).symm = γ.symm.cast hb ha :=
rfl
#align path.symm_cast Path.symm_cast
@[simp]
theorem trans_cast {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ c₁ c₂ : X} (γ : Path a₂ b₂)
(γ' : Path b₂ c₂) (ha : a₁ = a₂) (hb : b₁ = b₂) (hc : c₁ = c₂) :
(γ.cast ha hb).trans (γ'.cast hb hc) = (γ.trans γ').cast ha hc :=
rfl
#align path.trans_cast Path.trans_cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_coe (γ : Path x y) {x' y'} (hx : x' = x) (hy : y' = y) : (γ.cast hx hy : I → X) = γ :=
rfl
#align path.cast_coe Path.cast_coe
@[continuity]
theorem symm_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b : ι → X} (γ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h : Continuous ↿γ) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ t).symm :=
h.comp (continuous_id.prod_map continuous_symm)
#align path.symm_continuous_family Path.symm_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous (symm : Path x y → Path y x) :=
continuous_uncurry_iff.mp <| symm_continuous_family _ (continuous_fst.path_eval continuous_snd)
#align path.continuous_symm Path.continuous_symm
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b : ι → X} (γ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h : Continuous ↿γ) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ t).extend := by
apply h.comp (continuous_id.prod_map continuous_projIcc)
exact zero_le_one
#align path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem trans_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b c : ι → X} (γ₁ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h₁ : Continuous ↿γ₁)
(γ₂ : ∀ t : ι, Path (b t) (c t)) (h₂ : Continuous ↿γ₂) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ₁ t).trans (γ₂ t) := by
have h₁' := Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family γ₁ h₁
have h₂' := Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family γ₂ h₂
simp only [HasUncurry.uncurry, CoeFun.coe, Path.trans, (· ∘ ·)]
refine Continuous.if_le ?_ ?_ (continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_snd) continuous_const ?_
· change
Continuous ((fun p : ι × ℝ => (γ₁ p.1).extend p.2) ∘ Prod.map id (fun x => 2 * x : I → ℝ))
exact h₁'.comp (continuous_id.prod_map <| continuous_const.mul continuous_subtype_val)
· change
Continuous ((fun p : ι × ℝ => (γ₂ p.1).extend p.2) ∘ Prod.map id (fun x => 2 * x - 1 : I → ℝ))
exact
h₂'.comp
(continuous_id.prod_map <|
(continuous_const.mul continuous_subtype_val).sub continuous_const)
· rintro st hst
simp [hst, mul_inv_cancel (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
#align path.trans_continuous_family Path.trans_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_trans {f : Y → Path x y} {g : Y → Path y z} :
Continuous f → Continuous g → Continuous fun t => (f t).trans (g t) := by
intro hf hg
apply continuous_uncurry_iff.mp
exact trans_continuous_family _ (continuous_uncurry_iff.mpr hf) _ (continuous_uncurry_iff.mpr hg)
#align continuous.path_trans Continuous.path_trans
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_trans {x y z : X} : Continuous fun ρ : Path x y × Path y z => ρ.1.trans ρ.2 :=
continuous_fst.path_trans continuous_snd
#align path.continuous_trans Path.continuous_trans
/-! #### Product of paths -/
section Prod
variable {a₁ a₂ a₃ : X} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : Y}
/-- Given a path in `X` and a path in `Y`, we can take their pointwise product to get a path in
`X × Y`. -/
protected def prod (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂) : Path (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) where
toContinuousMap := ContinuousMap.prodMk γ₁.toContinuousMap γ₂.toContinuousMap
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
#align path.prod Path.prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_coe (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂) :
⇑(γ₁.prod γ₂) = fun t => (γ₁ t, γ₂ t) :=
rfl
#align path.prod_coe_fn Path.prod_coe
/-- Path composition commutes with products -/
theorem trans_prod_eq_prod_trans (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (δ₁ : Path a₂ a₃) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂)
(δ₂ : Path b₂ b₃) : (γ₁.prod γ₂).trans (δ₁.prod δ₂) = (γ₁.trans δ₁).prod (γ₂.trans δ₂) := by
ext t <;>
unfold Path.trans <;>
simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, Path.prod_coe, Function.comp_apply] <;>
split_ifs <;>
rfl
#align path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans Path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans
end Prod
section Pi
variable {χ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (χ i)] {as bs cs : ∀ i, χ i}
/-- Given a family of paths, one in each Xᵢ, we take their pointwise product to get a path in
Π i, Xᵢ. -/
protected def pi (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) : Path as bs where
toContinuousMap := ContinuousMap.pi fun i => (γ i).toContinuousMap
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
#align path.pi Path.pi
@[simp]
theorem pi_coe (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) : ⇑(Path.pi γ) = fun t i => γ i t :=
rfl
#align path.pi_coe_fn Path.pi_coe
/-- Path composition commutes with products -/
theorem trans_pi_eq_pi_trans (γ₀ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) (γ₁ : ∀ i, Path (bs i) (cs i)) :
(Path.pi γ₀).trans (Path.pi γ₁) = Path.pi fun i => (γ₀ i).trans (γ₁ i) := by
ext t i
unfold Path.trans
simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, pi_coe]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans
end Pi
/-! #### Pointwise multiplication/addition of two paths in a topological (additive) group -/
/-- Pointwise multiplication of paths in a topological group. The additive version is probably more
useful. -/
@[to_additive "Pointwise addition of paths in a topological additive group."]
protected def mul [Mul X] [ContinuousMul X] {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : X} (γ₁ : Path a₁ b₁) (γ₂ : Path a₂ b₂) :
Path (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) :=
(γ₁.prod γ₂).map continuous_mul
#align path.mul Path.mul
#align path.add Path.add
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_apply [Mul X] [ContinuousMul X] {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : X} (γ₁ : Path a₁ b₁)
(γ₂ : Path a₂ b₂) (t : unitInterval) : (γ₁.mul γ₂) t = γ₁ t * γ₂ t :=
rfl
#align path.mul_apply Path.mul_apply
#align path.add_apply Path.add_apply
/-! #### Truncating a path -/
/-- `γ.truncate t₀ t₁` is the path which follows the path `γ` on the
time interval `[t₀, t₁]` and stays still otherwise. -/
def truncate {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t₀ t₁ : ℝ) :
Path (γ.extend <| min t₀ t₁) (γ.extend t₁) where
toFun s := γ.extend (min (max s t₀) t₁)
continuous_toFun :=
γ.continuous_extend.comp ((continuous_subtype_val.max continuous_const).min continuous_const)
source' := by
simp only [min_def, max_def']
norm_cast
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
· simp [γ.extend_of_le_zero h₁]
· congr
linarith
· have h₄ : t₁ ≤ 0 := le_of_lt (by simpa using h₂)
simp [γ.extend_of_le_zero h₄, γ.extend_of_le_zero h₁]
all_goals rfl
target' := by
simp only [min_def, max_def']
norm_cast
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃
· simp [γ.extend_of_one_le h₂]
· rfl
· have h₄ : 1 ≤ t₀ := le_of_lt (by simpa using h₁)
simp [γ.extend_of_one_le h₄, γ.extend_of_one_le (h₄.trans h₃)]
· rfl
#align path.truncate Path.truncate
/-- `γ.truncateOfLE t₀ t₁ h`, where `h : t₀ ≤ t₁` is `γ.truncate t₀ t₁`
casted as a path from `γ.extend t₀` to `γ.extend t₁`. -/
def truncateOfLE {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t₀ t₁ : ℝ}
(h : t₀ ≤ t₁) : Path (γ.extend t₀) (γ.extend t₁) :=
(γ.truncate t₀ t₁).cast (by rw [min_eq_left h]) rfl
#align path.truncate_of_le Path.truncateOfLE
theorem truncate_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t₀ t₁ : ℝ} :
range (γ.truncate t₀ t₁) ⊆ range γ := by
rw [← γ.extend_range]
simp only [range_subset_iff, SetCoe.exists, SetCoe.forall]
intro x _hx
simp only [DFunLike.coe, Path.truncate, mem_range_self]
#align path.truncate_range Path.truncate_range
/-- For a path `γ`, `γ.truncate` gives a "continuous family of paths", by which we
mean the uncurried function which maps `(t₀, t₁, s)` to `γ.truncate t₀ t₁ s` is continuous. -/
@[continuity]
theorem truncate_continuous_family {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
Continuous (fun x => γ.truncate x.1 x.2.1 x.2.2 : ℝ × ℝ × I → X) :=
γ.continuous_extend.comp
(((continuous_subtype_val.comp (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)).max continuous_fst).min
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
#align path.truncate_continuous_family Path.truncate_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem truncate_const_continuous_family {a b : X} (γ : Path a b)
(t : ℝ) : Continuous ↿(γ.truncate t) := by
have key : Continuous (fun x => (t, x) : ℝ × I → ℝ × ℝ × I) := by continuity
exact γ.truncate_continuous_family.comp key
#align path.truncate_const_continuous_family Path.truncate_const_continuous_family
@[simp]
theorem truncate_self {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t : ℝ) :
γ.truncate t t = (Path.refl <| γ.extend t).cast (by rw [min_self]) rfl := by
ext x
rw [cast_coe]
simp only [truncate, DFunLike.coe, refl, min_def, max_def]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> congr
#align path.truncate_self Path.truncate_self
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: increase `simp` priority so left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem truncate_zero_zero {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 0 0 = (Path.refl a).cast (by rw [min_self, γ.extend_zero]) γ.extend_zero := by
convert γ.truncate_self 0
#align path.truncate_zero_zero Path.truncate_zero_zero
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: increase `simp` priority so left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem truncate_one_one {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 1 1 = (Path.refl b).cast (by rw [min_self, γ.extend_one]) γ.extend_one := by
convert γ.truncate_self 1
#align path.truncate_one_one Path.truncate_one_one
@[simp]
theorem truncate_zero_one {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 0 1 = γ.cast (by simp [zero_le_one, extend_zero]) (by simp) := by
ext x
rw [cast_coe]
have : ↑x ∈ (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ) := x.2
rw [truncate, coe_mk_mk, max_eq_left this.1, min_eq_left this.2, extend_extends']
#align path.truncate_zero_one Path.truncate_zero_one
/-! #### Reparametrising a path -/
/-- Given a path `γ` and a function `f : I → I` where `f 0 = 0` and `f 1 = 1`, `γ.reparam f` is the
path defined by `γ ∘ f`.
-/
def reparam (γ : Path x y) (f : I → I) (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) :
Path x y where
toFun := γ ∘ f
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simp [hf₀]
target' := by simp [hf₁]
#align path.reparam Path.reparam
@[simp]
theorem coe_reparam (γ : Path x y) {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0)
(hf₁ : f 1 = 1) : ⇑(γ.reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁) = γ ∘ f :=
rfl
#align path.coe_to_fun Path.coe_reparam
-- Porting note: this seems like it was poorly named (was: `coe_to_fun`)
@[simp]
theorem reparam_id (γ : Path x y) : γ.reparam id continuous_id rfl rfl = γ := by
ext
rfl
#align path.reparam_id Path.reparam_id
theorem range_reparam (γ : Path x y) {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0)
(hf₁ : f 1 = 1) : range (γ.reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁) = range γ := by
change range (γ ∘ f) = range γ
have : range f = univ := by
rw [range_iff_surjective]
intro t
have h₁ : Continuous (Set.IccExtend (zero_le_one' ℝ) f) := by continuity
have := intermediate_value_Icc (zero_le_one' ℝ) h₁.continuousOn
· rw [IccExtend_left, IccExtend_right, Icc.mk_zero, Icc.mk_one, hf₀, hf₁] at this
rcases this t.2 with ⟨w, hw₁, hw₂⟩
rw [IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hw₁] at hw₂
exact ⟨_, hw₂⟩
rw [range_comp, this, image_univ]
#align path.range_reparam Path.range_reparam
theorem refl_reparam {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) :
(refl x).reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁ = refl x := by
ext
simp
#align path.refl_reparam Path.refl_reparam
end Path
/-! ### Being joined by a path -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path". This is an equivalence relation. -/
def Joined (x y : X) : Prop :=
Nonempty (Path x y)
#align joined Joined
@[refl]
theorem Joined.refl (x : X) : Joined x x :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
#align joined.refl Joined.refl
/-- When two points are joined, choose some path from `x` to `y`. -/
def Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some h
#align joined.some_path Joined.somePath
@[symm]
theorem Joined.symm {x y : X} (h : Joined x y) : Joined y x :=
⟨h.somePath.symm⟩
#align joined.symm Joined.symm
@[trans]
theorem Joined.trans {x y z : X} (hxy : Joined x y) (hyz : Joined y z) : Joined x z :=
⟨hxy.somePath.trans hyz.somePath⟩
#align joined.trans Joined.trans
variable (X)
/-- The setoid corresponding the equivalence relation of being joined by a continuous path. -/
def pathSetoid : Setoid X where
r := Joined
iseqv := Equivalence.mk Joined.refl Joined.symm Joined.trans
#align path_setoid pathSetoid
/-- The quotient type of points of a topological space modulo being joined by a continuous path. -/
def ZerothHomotopy :=
Quotient (pathSetoid X)
#align zeroth_homotopy ZerothHomotopy
instance ZerothHomotopy.inhabited : Inhabited (ZerothHomotopy ℝ) :=
⟨@Quotient.mk' ℝ (pathSetoid ℝ) 0⟩
variable {X}
/-! ### Being joined by a path inside a set -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path in `F`". Not quite an equivalence relation since it's not
reflexive for points that do not belong to `F`. -/
def JoinedIn (F : Set X) (x y : X) : Prop :=
∃ γ : Path x y, ∀ t, γ t ∈ F
#align joined_in JoinedIn
variable {F : Set X}
theorem JoinedIn.mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F ∧ y ∈ F := by
rcases h with ⟨γ, γ_in⟩
have : γ 0 ∈ F ∧ γ 1 ∈ F := by constructor <;> apply γ_in
simpa using this
#align joined_in.mem JoinedIn.mem
theorem JoinedIn.source_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F :=
h.mem.1
#align joined_in.source_mem JoinedIn.source_mem
theorem JoinedIn.target_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : y ∈ F :=
h.mem.2
#align joined_in.target_mem JoinedIn.target_mem
/-- When `x` and `y` are joined in `F`, choose a path from `x` to `y` inside `F` -/
def JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Path x y :=
Classical.choose h
#align joined_in.some_path JoinedIn.somePath
theorem JoinedIn.somePath_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) (t : I) : h.somePath t ∈ F :=
Classical.choose_spec h t
#align joined_in.some_path_mem JoinedIn.somePath_mem
/-- If `x` and `y` are joined in the set `F`, then they are joined in the subtype `F`. -/
theorem JoinedIn.joined_subtype (h : JoinedIn F x y) :
Joined (⟨x, h.source_mem⟩ : F) (⟨y, h.target_mem⟩ : F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun t => ⟨h.somePath t, h.somePath_mem t⟩
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simp
target' := by simp }⟩
#align joined_in.joined_subtype JoinedIn.joined_subtype
theorem JoinedIn.ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y)
(hF : f '' I ⊆ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨Path.ofLine hf h₀ h₁, fun t => hF <| Path.ofLine_mem hf h₀ h₁ t⟩
#align joined_in.of_line JoinedIn.ofLine
theorem JoinedIn.joined (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Joined x y :=
⟨h.somePath⟩
#align joined_in.joined JoinedIn.joined
theorem joinedIn_iff_joined (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
JoinedIn F x y ↔ Joined (⟨x, x_in⟩ : F) (⟨y, y_in⟩ : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.joined_subtype, fun h => ⟨h.somePath.map continuous_subtype_val, by simp⟩⟩
#align joined_in_iff_joined joinedIn_iff_joined
@[simp]
theorem joinedIn_univ : JoinedIn univ x y ↔ Joined x y := by
simp [JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align joined_in_univ joinedIn_univ
theorem JoinedIn.mono {U V : Set X} (h : JoinedIn U x y) (hUV : U ⊆ V) : JoinedIn V x y :=
⟨h.somePath, fun t => hUV (h.somePath_mem t)⟩
#align joined_in.mono JoinedIn.mono
theorem JoinedIn.refl (h : x ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x x :=
⟨Path.refl x, fun _t => h⟩
#align joined_in.refl JoinedIn.refl
@[symm]
theorem JoinedIn.symm (h : JoinedIn F x y) : JoinedIn F y x := by
cases' h.mem with hx hy
simp_all [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact h.symm
#align joined_in.symm JoinedIn.symm
theorem JoinedIn.trans (hxy : JoinedIn F x y) (hyz : JoinedIn F y z) : JoinedIn F x z := by
cases' hxy.mem with hx hy
cases' hyz.mem with hx hy
simp_all [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact hxy.trans hyz
#align joined_in.trans JoinedIn.trans
theorem Specializes.joinedIn (h : x ⤳ y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨Set.piecewise {1} (const I y) (const I x), ?_⟩, by simp, by simp⟩, fun t ↦ ?_⟩
· exact isClosed_singleton.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes continuous_const continuous_const
fun _ ↦ h
· simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, piecewise]
split_ifs <;> assumption
theorem Inseparable.joinedIn (h : Inseparable x y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
h.specializes.joinedIn hx hy
/-! ### Path component -/
/-- The path component of `x` is the set of points that can be joined to `x`. -/
def pathComponent (x : X) :=
{ y | Joined x y }
#align path_component pathComponent
@[simp]
theorem mem_pathComponent_self (x : X) : x ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.refl x
#align mem_path_component_self mem_pathComponent_self
@[simp]
theorem pathComponent.nonempty (x : X) : (pathComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponent_self x⟩
#align path_component.nonempty pathComponent.nonempty
theorem mem_pathComponent_of_mem (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : y ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.symm h
#align mem_path_component_of_mem mem_pathComponent_of_mem
theorem pathComponent_symm : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ y ∈ pathComponent x :=
⟨fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h, fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h⟩
#align path_component_symm pathComponent_symm
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/PathConnected.lean | 919 | 927 | theorem pathComponent_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : pathComponent x = pathComponent y := by |
ext z
constructor
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm]
exact (h.trans h').symm
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm] at h' ⊢
exact h'.trans h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.PUnitInstances
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
/-!
# Coproduct (free product) of two monoids or groups
In this file we define `Monoid.Coprod M N` (notation: `M ∗ N`)
to be the coproduct (a.k.a. free product) of two monoids.
The same type is used for the coproduct of two monoids and for the coproduct of two groups.
The coproduct `M ∗ N` has the following universal property:
for any monoid `P` and homomorphisms `f : M →* P`, `g : N →* P`,
there exists a unique homomorphism `fg : M ∗ N →* P`
such that `fg ∘ Monoid.Coprod.inl = f` and `fg ∘ Monoid.Coprod.inr = g`,
where `Monoid.Coprod.inl : M →* M ∗ N`
and `Monoid.Coprod.inr : N →* M ∗ N` are canonical embeddings.
This homomorphism `fg` is given by `Monoid.Coprod.lift f g`.
We also define some homomorphisms and isomorphisms about `M ∗ N`,
and provide additive versions of all definitions and theorems.
## Main definitions
### Types
* `Monoid.Coprod M N` (a.k.a. `M ∗ N`):
the free product (a.k.a. coproduct) of two monoids `M` and `N`.
* `AddMonoid.Coprod M N` (no notation): the additive version of `Monoid.Coprod`.
In other sections, we only list multiplicative definitions.
### Instances
* `MulOneClass`, `Monoid`, and `Group` structures on the coproduct `M ∗ N`.
### Monoid homomorphisms
* `Monoid.Coprod.mk`: the projection `FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* M ∗ N`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.inl`, `Monoid.Coprod.inr`: canonical embeddings `M →* M ∗ N` and `N →* M ∗ N`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.lift`: construct a monoid homomorphism `M ∗ N →* P`
from homomorphisms `M →* P` and `N →* P`; see also `Monoid.Coprod.liftEquiv`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.clift`: a constructor for homomorphisms `M ∗ N →* P`
that allows the user to control the computational behavior.
* `Monoid.Coprod.map`: combine two homomorphisms `f : M →* N` and `g : M' →* N'`
into `M ∗ M' →* N ∗ N'`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.swap`: the natural homomorphism `M ∗ N →* N ∗ M`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.fst`, `Monoid.Coprod.snd`, and `Monoid.Coprod.toProd`:
natural projections `M ∗ N →* M`, `M ∗ N →* N`, and `M ∗ N →* M × N`.
### Monoid isomorphisms
* `MulEquiv.coprodCongr`: a `MulEquiv` version of `Monoid.Coprod.map`.
* `MulEquiv.coprodComm`: a `MulEquiv` version of `Monoid.Coprod.swap`.
* `MulEquiv.coprodAssoc`: associativity of the coproduct.
* `MulEquiv.coprodPUnit`, `MulEquiv.punitCoprod`:
free product by `PUnit` on the left or on the right is isomorphic to the original monoid.
## Main results
The universal property of the coproduct
is given by the definition `Monoid.Coprod.lift` and the lemma `Monoid.Coprod.lift_unique`.
We also prove a slightly more general extensionality lemma `Monoid.Coprod.hom_ext`
for homomorphisms `M ∗ N →* P` and prove lots of basic lemmas like `Monoid.Coprod.fst_comp_inl`.
## Implementation details
The definition of the coproduct of an indexed family of monoids is formalized in `Monoid.CoprodI`.
While mathematically `M ∗ N` is a particular case
of the coproduct of an indexed family of monoids,
it is easier to build API from scratch instead of using something like
```
def Monoid.Coprod M N := Monoid.CoprodI ![M, N]
```
or
```
def Monoid.Coprod M N := Monoid.CoprodI (fun b : Bool => cond b M N)
```
There are several reasons to build an API from scratch.
- API about `Con` makes it easy to define the required type and prove the universal property,
so there is little overhead compared to transferring API from `Monoid.CoprodI`.
- If `M` and `N` live in different universes, then the definition has to add `ULift`s;
this makes it harder to transfer API and definitions.
- As of now, we have no way
to automatically build an instance of `(k : Fin 2) → Monoid (![M, N] k)`
from `[Monoid M]` and `[Monoid N]`,
not even speaking about more advanced typeclass assumptions that involve both `M` and `N`.
- Using a list of `M ⊕ N` instead of, e.g., a list of `Σ k : Fin 2, ![M, N] k`
as the underlying type makes it possible to write computationally effective code
(though this point is not tested yet).
## TODO
- Prove `Monoid.CoprodI (f : Fin 2 → Type*) ≃* f 0 ∗ f 1` and
`Monoid.CoprodI (f : Bool → Type*) ≃* f false ∗ f true`.
## Tags
group, monoid, coproduct, free product
-/
open FreeMonoid Function List Set
namespace Monoid
/-- The minimal congruence relation `c` on `FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N)`
such that `FreeMonoid.of ∘ Sum.inl` and `FreeMonoid.of ∘ Sum.inr` are monoid homomorphisms
to the quotient by `c`. -/
@[to_additive "The minimal additive congruence relation `c` on `FreeAddMonoid (M ⊕ N)`
such that `FreeAddMonoid.of ∘ Sum.inl` and `FreeAddMonoid.of ∘ Sum.inr`
are additive monoid homomorphisms to the quotient by `c`."]
def coprodCon (M N : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] : Con (FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N)) :=
sInf {c |
(∀ x y : M, c (of (Sum.inl (x * y))) (of (Sum.inl x) * of (Sum.inl y)))
∧ (∀ x y : N, c (of (Sum.inr (x * y))) (of (Sum.inr x) * of (Sum.inr y)))
∧ c (of <| Sum.inl 1) 1 ∧ c (of <| Sum.inr 1) 1}
/-- Coproduct of two monoids or groups. -/
@[to_additive "Coproduct of two additive monoids or groups."]
def Coprod (M N : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] := (coprodCon M N).Quotient
namespace Coprod
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infix:30 " ∗ " => Coprod
section MulOneClass
variable {M N M' N' P : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass M'] [MulOneClass N']
[MulOneClass P]
@[to_additive] protected instance : MulOneClass (M ∗ N) := Con.mulOneClass _
/-- The natural projection `FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* M ∗ N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural projection `FreeAddMonoid (M ⊕ N) →+ AddMonoid.Coprod M N`."]
def mk : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* M ∗ N := Con.mk' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem con_ker_mk : Con.ker mk = coprodCon M N := Con.mk'_ker _
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_surjective : Surjective (@mk M N _ _) := surjective_quot_mk _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mrange_mk : MonoidHom.mrange (@mk M N _ _) = ⊤ := Con.mrange_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_eq_mk {w₁ w₂ : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N)} : mk w₁ = mk w₂ ↔ coprodCon M N w₁ w₂ := Con.eq _
/-- The natural embedding `M →* M ∗ N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural embedding `M →+ AddMonoid.Coprod M N`."]
def inl : M →* M ∗ N where
toFun := fun x => mk (of (.inl x))
map_one' := mk_eq_mk.2 fun _c hc => hc.2.2.1
map_mul' := fun x y => mk_eq_mk.2 fun _c hc => hc.1 x y
/-- The natural embedding `N →* M ∗ N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural embedding `N →+ AddMonoid.Coprod M N`."]
def inr : N →* M ∗ N where
toFun := fun x => mk (of (.inr x))
map_one' := mk_eq_mk.2 fun _c hc => hc.2.2.2
map_mul' := fun x y => mk_eq_mk.2 fun _c hc => hc.2.1 x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_of_inl (x : M) : (mk (of (.inl x)) : M ∗ N) = inl x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_of_inr (x : N) : (mk (of (.inr x)) : M ∗ N) = inr x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on' {C : M ∗ N → Prop} (m : M ∗ N)
(one : C 1)
(inl_mul : ∀ m x, C x → C (inl m * x))
(inr_mul : ∀ n x, C x → C (inr n * x)) : C m := by
rcases mk_surjective m with ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x using FreeMonoid.recOn with
| h0 => exact one
| ih x xs ih =>
cases x with
| inl m => simpa using inl_mul m _ ih
| inr n => simpa using inr_mul n _ ih
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on {C : M ∗ N → Prop} (m : M ∗ N)
(inl : ∀ m, C (inl m)) (inr : ∀ n, C (inr n)) (mul : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) : C m :=
induction_on' m (by simpa using inl 1) (fun _ _ ↦ mul _ _ (inl _)) fun _ _ ↦ mul _ _ (inr _)
/-- Lift a monoid homomorphism `FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P` satisfying additional properties to
`M ∗ N →* P`. In many cases, `Coprod.lift` is more convenient.
Compared to `Coprod.lift`,
this definition allows a user to provide a custom computational behavior.
Also, it only needs `MulOneclass` assumptions while `Coprod.lift` needs a `Monoid` structure.
-/
@[to_additive "Lift an additive monoid homomorphism `FreeAddMonoid (M ⊕ N) →+ P` satisfying
additional properties to `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ P`.
Compared to `AddMonoid.Coprod.lift`,
this definition allows a user to provide a custom computational behavior.
Also, it only needs `AddZeroclass` assumptions
while `AddMonoid.Coprod.lift` needs an `AddMonoid` structure. "]
def clift (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P)
(hM₁ : f (of (.inl 1)) = 1) (hN₁ : f (of (.inr 1)) = 1)
(hM : ∀ x y, f (of (.inl (x * y))) = f (of (.inl x) * of (.inl y)))
(hN : ∀ x y, f (of (.inr (x * y))) = f (of (.inr x) * of (.inr y))) :
M ∗ N →* P :=
Con.lift _ f <| sInf_le ⟨hM, hN, hM₁.trans (map_one f).symm, hN₁.trans (map_one f).symm⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_apply_inl (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P) (hM₁ hN₁ hM hN) (x : M) :
clift f hM₁ hN₁ hM hN (inl x) = f (of (.inl x)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_apply_inr (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P) (hM₁ hN₁ hM hN) (x : N) :
clift f hM₁ hN₁ hM hN (inr x) = f (of (.inr x)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_apply_mk (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P) (hM₁ hN₁ hM hN w) :
clift f hM₁ hN₁ hM hN (mk w) = f w :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_comp_mk (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P) (hM₁ hN₁ hM hN) :
(clift f hM₁ hN₁ hM hN).comp mk = f :=
DFunLike.ext' rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mclosure_range_inl_union_inr :
Submonoid.closure (range (inl : M →* M ∗ N) ∪ range (inr : N →* M ∗ N)) = ⊤ := by
rw [← mrange_mk, MonoidHom.mrange_eq_map, ← closure_range_of, MonoidHom.map_mclosure,
← range_comp, Sum.range_eq]; rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mrange_inl_sup_mrange_inr :
MonoidHom.mrange (inl : M →* M ∗ N) ⊔ MonoidHom.mrange (inr : N →* M ∗ N) = ⊤ := by
rw [← mclosure_range_inl_union_inr, Submonoid.closure_union, ← MonoidHom.coe_mrange,
← MonoidHom.coe_mrange, Submonoid.closure_eq, Submonoid.closure_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem codisjoint_mrange_inl_mrange_inr :
Codisjoint (MonoidHom.mrange (inl : M →* M ∗ N)) (MonoidHom.mrange inr) :=
codisjoint_iff.2 mrange_inl_sup_mrange_inr
@[to_additive] theorem mrange_eq (f : M ∗ N →* P) :
MonoidHom.mrange f = MonoidHom.mrange (f.comp inl) ⊔ MonoidHom.mrange (f.comp inr) := by
rw [MonoidHom.mrange_eq_map, ← mrange_inl_sup_mrange_inr, Submonoid.map_sup, MonoidHom.map_mrange,
MonoidHom.map_mrange]
/-- Extensionality lemma for monoid homomorphisms `M ∗ N →* P`.
If two homomorphisms agree on the ranges of `Monoid.Coprod.inl` and `Monoid.Coprod.inr`,
then they are equal. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext 1100)
"Extensionality lemma for additive monoid homomorphisms `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ P`.
If two homomorphisms agree on the ranges of `AddMonoid.Coprod.inl` and `AddMonoid.Coprod.inr`,
then they are equal."]
theorem hom_ext {f g : M ∗ N →* P} (h₁ : f.comp inl = g.comp inl) (h₂ : f.comp inr = g.comp inr) :
f = g :=
MonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM mclosure_range_inl_union_inr <| eqOn_union.2
⟨eqOn_range.2 <| DFunLike.ext'_iff.1 h₁, eqOn_range.2 <| DFunLike.ext'_iff.1 h₂⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_mk :
clift (mk : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* M ∗ N) (map_one inl) (map_one inr) (map_mul inl)
(map_mul inr) = .id _ :=
hom_ext rfl rfl
/-- Map `M ∗ N` to `M' ∗ N'` by applying `Sum.map f g` to each element of the underlying list. -/
@[to_additive "Map `AddMonoid.Coprod M N` to `AddMonoid.Coprod M' N'`
by applying `Sum.map f g` to each element of the underlying list."]
def map (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') : M ∗ N →* M' ∗ N' :=
clift (mk.comp <| FreeMonoid.map <| Sum.map f g)
(by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.map_inl, map_one, mk_of_inl])
(by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.map_inr, map_one, mk_of_inr])
(fun x y => by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.map_inl, map_mul, mk_of_inl])
fun x y => by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.map_inr, map_mul, mk_of_inr]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mk_ofList (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (l : List (M ⊕ N)) :
map f g (mk (ofList l)) = mk (ofList (l.map (Sum.map f g))) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_apply_inl (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (x : M) : map f g (inl x) = inl (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_apply_inr (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (x : N) : map f g (inr x) = inr (g x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comp_inl (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') : (map f g).comp inl = inl.comp f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comp_inr (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') : (map f g).comp inr = inr.comp g := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id_id : map (.id M) (.id N) = .id (M ∗ N) := hom_ext rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comp_map {M'' N''} [MulOneClass M''] [MulOneClass N''] (f' : M' →* M'') (g' : N' →* N'')
(f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') : (map f' g').comp (map f g) = map (f'.comp f) (g'.comp g) :=
hom_ext rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_map {M'' N''} [MulOneClass M''] [MulOneClass N''] (f' : M' →* M'') (g' : N' →* N'')
(f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (x : M ∗ N) :
map f' g' (map f g x) = map (f'.comp f) (g'.comp g) x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (map_comp_map f' g' f g) x
variable (M N)
/-- Map `M ∗ N` to `N ∗ M` by applying `Sum.swap` to each element of the underlying list.
See also `MulEquiv.coprodComm` for a `MulEquiv` version. -/
@[to_additive "Map `AddMonoid.Coprod M N` to `AddMonoid.Coprod N M`
by applying `Sum.swap` to each element of the underlying list.
See also `AddEquiv.coprodComm` for an `AddEquiv` version."]
def swap : M ∗ N →* N ∗ M :=
clift (mk.comp <| FreeMonoid.map Sum.swap)
(by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.swap_inl, mk_of_inr, map_one])
(by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.swap_inr, mk_of_inl, map_one])
(fun x y => by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.swap_inl, mk_of_inr, map_mul])
(fun x y => by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.swap_inr, mk_of_inl, map_mul])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem swap_comp_swap : (swap M N).comp (swap N M) = .id _ := hom_ext rfl rfl
variable {M N}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem swap_swap (x : M ∗ N) : swap N M (swap M N x) = x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (swap_comp_swap _ _) x
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_comp_map (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') :
(swap M' N').comp (map f g) = (map g f).comp (swap M N) :=
hom_ext rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_map (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (x : M ∗ N) :
swap M' N' (map f g x) = map g f (swap M N x) :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (swap_comp_map f g) x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem swap_comp_inl : (swap M N).comp inl = inr := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem swap_inl (x : M) : swap M N (inl x) = inr x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem swap_comp_inr : (swap M N).comp inr = inl := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem swap_inr (x : N) : swap M N (inr x) = inl x := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_injective : Injective (swap M N) := LeftInverse.injective swap_swap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem swap_inj {x y : M ∗ N} : swap M N x = swap M N y ↔ x = y := swap_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem swap_eq_one {x : M ∗ N} : swap M N x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := swap_injective.eq_iff' (map_one _)
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_surjective : Surjective (swap M N) := LeftInverse.surjective swap_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_bijective : Bijective (swap M N) := ⟨swap_injective, swap_surjective⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mker_swap : MonoidHom.mker (swap M N) = ⊥ := Submonoid.ext fun _ ↦ swap_eq_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mrange_swap : MonoidHom.mrange (swap M N) = ⊤ :=
MonoidHom.mrange_top_of_surjective _ swap_surjective
end MulOneClass
section Lift
variable {M N P : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [Monoid P]
/-- Lift a pair of monoid homomorphisms `f : M →* P`, `g : N →* P`
to a monoid homomorphism `M ∗ N →* P`.
See also `Coprod.clift` for a version that allows custom computational behavior
and works for a `MulOneClass` codomain.
-/
@[to_additive "Lift a pair of additive monoid homomorphisms `f : M →+ P`, `g : N →+ P`
to an additive monoid homomorphism `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ P`.
See also `AddMonoid.Coprod.clift` for a version that allows custom computational behavior
and works for an `AddZeroClass` codomain."]
def lift (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) : (M ∗ N) →* P :=
clift (FreeMonoid.lift <| Sum.elim f g) (map_one f) (map_one g) (map_mul f) (map_mul g)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_apply_mk (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) (x : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N)) :
lift f g (mk x) = FreeMonoid.lift (Sum.elim f g) x :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_apply_inl (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) (x : M) : lift f g (inl x) = f x :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_unique {f : M →* P} {g : N →* P} {fg : M ∗ N →* P} (h₁ : fg.comp inl = f)
(h₂ : fg.comp inr = g) : fg = lift f g :=
hom_ext h₁ h₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_inl (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) : (lift f g).comp inl = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_apply_inr (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) (x : N) : lift f g (inr x) = g x :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_inr (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) : (lift f g).comp inr = g := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_swap (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) : (lift f g).comp (swap N M) = lift g f :=
hom_ext rfl rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_swap (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) (x : N ∗ M) : lift f g (swap N M x) = lift g f x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_comp_swap f g) x
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_lift {P' : Type*} [Monoid P'] (f : P →* P') (g₁ : M →* P) (g₂ : N →* P) :
f.comp (lift g₁ g₂) = lift (f.comp g₁) (f.comp g₂) :=
hom_ext (by rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, lift_comp_inl, lift_comp_inl]) <| by
rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, lift_comp_inr, lift_comp_inr]
/-- `Coprod.lift` as an equivalence. -/
@[to_additive "`AddMonoid.Coprod.lift` as an equivalence."]
def liftEquiv : (M →* P) × (N →* P) ≃ (M ∗ N →* P) where
toFun fg := lift fg.1 fg.2
invFun f := (f.comp inl, f.comp inr)
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := Eq.symm <| lift_unique rfl rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mrange_lift (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f g) = MonoidHom.mrange f ⊔ MonoidHom.mrange g := by
simp [mrange_eq]
end Lift
section ToProd
variable {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N]
@[to_additive] instance : Monoid (M ∗ N) :=
{ mul_assoc := (Con.monoid _).mul_assoc
one_mul := (Con.monoid _).one_mul
mul_one := (Con.monoid _).mul_one }
/-- The natural projection `M ∗ N →* M`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural projection `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ M`."]
def fst : M ∗ N →* M := lift (.id M) 1
/-- The natural projection `M ∗ N →* N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural projection `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ N`."]
def snd : M ∗ N →* N := lift 1 (.id N)
/-- The natural projection `M ∗ N →* M × N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural projection `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ M × N`."]
def toProd : M ∗ N →* M × N := lift (.inl _ _) (.inr _ _)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem fst_comp_inl : (fst : M ∗ N →* M).comp inl = .id _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem fst_apply_inl (x : M) : fst (inl x : M ∗ N) = x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem fst_comp_inr : (fst : M ∗ N →* M).comp inr = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem fst_apply_inr (x : N) : fst (inr x : M ∗ N) = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem snd_comp_inl : (snd : M ∗ N →* N).comp inl = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem snd_apply_inl (x : M) : snd (inl x : M ∗ N) = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem snd_comp_inr : (snd : M ∗ N →* N).comp inr = .id _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem snd_apply_inr (x : N) : snd (inr x : M ∗ N) = x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toProd_comp_inl : (toProd : M ∗ N →* M × N).comp inl = .inl _ _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toProd_comp_inr : (toProd : M ∗ N →* M × N).comp inr = .inr _ _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toProd_apply_inl (x : M) : toProd (inl x : M ∗ N) = (x, 1) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toProd_apply_inr (x : N) : toProd (inr x : M ∗ N) = (1, x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem fst_prod_snd : (fst : M ∗ N →* M).prod snd = toProd := by ext1 <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coprod/Basic.lean | 508 | 509 | theorem prod_mk_fst_snd (x : M ∗ N) : (fst x, snd x) = toProd x := by |
rw [← fst_prod_snd, MonoidHom.prod_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attr
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.FinsetOps
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.finset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Finite sets
Terms of type `Finset α` are one way of talking about finite subsets of `α` in mathlib.
Below, `Finset α` is defined as a structure with 2 fields:
1. `val` is a `Multiset α` of elements;
2. `nodup` is a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
Finsets in Lean are constructive in that they have an underlying `List` that enumerates their
elements. In particular, any function that uses the data of the underlying list cannot depend on its
ordering. This is handled on the `Multiset` level by multiset API, so in most cases one needn't
worry about it explicitly.
Finsets give a basic foundation for defining finite sums and products over types:
1. `∑ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`;
2. `∏ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`.
Lean refers to these operations as big operators.
More information can be found in `Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset`.
Finsets are directly used to define fintypes in Lean.
A `Fintype α` instance for a type `α` consists of a universal `Finset α` containing every term of
`α`, called `univ`. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
There is also `univ'`, the noncomputable partner to `univ`,
which is defined to be `α` as a finset if `α` is finite,
and the empty finset otherwise. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
`Finset.card`, the size of a finset is defined in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card`.
This is then used to define `Fintype.card`, the size of a type.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset`: Defines a type for the finite subsets of `α`.
Constructing a `Finset` requires two pieces of data: `val`, a `Multiset α` of elements,
and `nodup`, a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
* `Finset.instMembershipFinset`: Defines membership `a ∈ (s : Finset α)`.
* `Finset.instCoeTCFinsetSet`: Provides a coercion `s : Finset α` to `s : Set α`.
* `Finset.instCoeSortFinsetType`: Coerce `s : Finset α` to the type of all `x ∈ s`.
* `Finset.induction_on`: Induction on finsets. To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty finset, and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the finset obtained by inserting a new element.
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Finset constructions
* `Finset.instSingletonFinset`: Denoted by `{a}`; the finset consisting of one element.
* `Finset.empty`: Denoted by `∅`. The finset associated to any type consisting of no elements.
* `Finset.range`: For any `n : ℕ`, `range n` is equal to `{0, 1, ... , n - 1} ⊆ ℕ`.
This convention is consistent with other languages and normalizes `card (range n) = n`.
Beware, `n` is not in `range n`.
* `Finset.attach`: Given `s : Finset α`, `attach s` forms a finset of elements of the subtype
`{a // a ∈ s}`; in other words, it attaches elements to a proof of membership in the set.
### Finsets from functions
* `Finset.filter`: Given a decidable predicate `p : α → Prop`, `s.filter p` is
the finset consisting of those elements in `s` satisfying the predicate `p`.
### The lattice structure on subsets of finsets
There is a natural lattice structure on the subsets of a set.
In Lean, we use lattice notation to talk about things involving unions and intersections. See
`Mathlib.Order.Lattice`. For the lattice structure on finsets, `⊥` is called `bot` with `⊥ = ∅` and
`⊤` is called `top` with `⊤ = univ`.
* `Finset.instHasSubsetFinset`: Lots of API about lattices, otherwise behaves as one would expect.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: Defines `s ∪ t` (or `s ⊔ t`) as the union of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.sup`/`Finset.biUnion` for finite unions.
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: Defines `s ∩ t` (or `s ⊓ t`) as the intersection of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.inf` for finite intersections.
### Operations on two or more finsets
* `insert` and `Finset.cons`: For any `a : α`, `insert s a` returns `s ∪ {a}`. `cons s a h`
returns the same except that it requires a hypothesis stating that `a` is not already in `s`.
This does not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.erase`: For any `a : α`, `erase s a` returns `s` with the element `a` removed.
* `Finset.instSDiffFinset`: Defines the set difference `s \ t` for finsets `s` and `t`.
* `Finset.product`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of `α × β`.
For arbitrary dependent products, see `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi`.
### Predicates on finsets
* `Disjoint`: defined via the lattice structure on finsets; two sets are disjoint if their
intersection is empty.
* `Finset.Nonempty`: A finset is nonempty if it has elements. This is equivalent to saying `s ≠ ∅`.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib.Data.Equiv` files describe a general type of equivalence, so look in there for any
lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that `s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen
assert_not_exists Multiset.Powerset
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Multiset Subtype Nat Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure Finset (α : Type*) where
/-- The underlying multiset -/
val : Multiset α
/-- `val` contains no duplicates -/
nodup : Nodup val
#align finset Finset
instance Multiset.canLiftFinset {α} : CanLift (Multiset α) (Finset α) Finset.val Multiset.Nodup :=
⟨fun m hm => ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
#align multiset.can_lift_finset Multiset.canLiftFinset
namespace Finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : Finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩, ⟨t, _⟩, h => by cases h; rfl
#align finset.eq_of_veq Finset.eq_of_veq
theorem val_injective : Injective (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ => eq_of_veq
#align finset.val_injective Finset.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem val_inj {s t : Finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
val_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.val_inj Finset.val_inj
@[simp]
theorem dedup_eq_self [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : dedup s.1 = s.1 :=
s.2.dedup
#align finset.dedup_eq_self Finset.dedup_eq_self
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Finset α)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
#align finset.has_decidable_eq Finset.decidableEq
/-! ### membership -/
instance : Membership α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_def Finset.mem_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_val {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s.1 ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_val Finset.mem_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @Finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_mk Finset.mem_mk
instance decidableMem [_h : DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Multiset.decidableMem _ _
#align finset.decidable_mem Finset.decidableMem
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ a = b) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ b = a) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
/-! ### set coercion -/
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
@[coe] def toSet (s : Finset α) : Set α :=
{ a | a ∈ s }
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : CoeTC (Finset α) (Set α) :=
⟨toSet⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ (s : Set α) ↔ a ∈ (s : Finset α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_coe Finset.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem {α} {s : Finset α} : { a | a ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align finset.set_of_mem Finset.setOf_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_mem {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) : ↑x ∈ s :=
x.2
#align finset.coe_mem Finset.coe_mem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mk_coe {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) {h} : (⟨x, h⟩ : (s : Set α)) = x :=
Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align finset.mk_coe Finset.mk_coe
instance decidableMem' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ (s : Set α)) :=
s.decidableMem _
#align finset.decidable_mem' Finset.decidableMem'
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans <| s₁.nodup.ext s₂.nodup
#align finset.ext_iff Finset.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
#align finset.ext Finset.ext
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
Set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
#align finset.coe_inj Finset.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective {α} : Injective ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) := fun _s _t => coe_inj.1
#align finset.coe_injective Finset.coe_injective
/-! ### type coercion -/
/-- Coercion from a finset to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type u} : CoeSort (Finset α) (Type u) :=
⟨fun s => { x // x ∈ s }⟩
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem forall_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align finset.forall_coe Finset.forall_coe
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem exists_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align finset.exists_coe Finset.exists_coe
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift (ι : Type*) (α : ι → Type*) [_ne : ∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
(s : Finset ι) : CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α (· ∈ s)
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift' (ι α : Type*) [_ne : Nonempty α] (s : Finset ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiFinsetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift' Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift'
instance FinsetCoe.canLift (s : Finset α) : CanLift α s (↑) fun a => a ∈ s where
prf a ha := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align finset.finset_coe.can_lift Finset.FinsetCoe.canLift
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sort_coe (s : Finset α) : ((s : Set α) : Sort _) = s :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_sort_coe Finset.coe_sort_coe
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
section Subset
variable {s t : Finset α}
instance : HasSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Finset α) where
le := (· ⊆ ·)
lt := (· ⊂ ·)
le_refl s a := id
le_trans s t u hst htu a ha := htu <| hst ha
le_antisymm s t hst hts := ext fun a => ⟨@hst _, @hts _⟩
instance : IsRefl (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
theorem subset_def : s ⊆ t ↔ s.1 ⊆ t.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_def Finset.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.ssubset_def Finset.ssubset_def
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ s :=
Multiset.Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.refl Finset.Subset.refl
protected theorem Subset.rfl {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.rfl Finset.Subset.rfl
protected theorem subset_of_eq {s t : Finset α} (h : s = t) : s ⊆ t :=
h ▸ Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset_of_eq Finset.subset_of_eq
theorem Subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ :=
Multiset.Subset.trans
#align finset.subset.trans Finset.Subset.trans
theorem Superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ := fun h' h =>
Subset.trans h h'
#align finset.superset.trans Finset.Superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
Multiset.mem_of_subset
#align finset.mem_of_subset Finset.mem_of_subset
theorem not_mem_mono {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) {a : α} : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align finset.not_mem_mono Finset.not_mem_mono
theorem Subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext fun a => ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
#align finset.subset.antisymm Finset.Subset.antisymm
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_iff Finset.subset_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_subset Finset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
le_iff_subset s₁.2
#align finset.val_le_iff Finset.val_le_iff
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
#align finset.subset.antisymm_iff Finset.Subset.antisymm_iff
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∉ t := by simp only [← coe_subset, Set.not_subset, mem_coe]
#align finset.not_subset Finset.not_subset
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.le_eq_subset Finset.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_subset : ((· < ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.lt_eq_subset Finset.lt_eq_subset
theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.le_iff_subset Finset.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.lt_iff_ssubset Finset.lt_iff_ssubset
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁ by simp only [Set.ssubset_def, Finset.coe_subset]
#align finset.coe_ssubset Finset.coe_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff <| not_congr val_le_iff
#align finset.val_lt_iff Finset.val_lt_iff
lemma val_strictMono : StrictMono (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ ↦ val_lt_iff.2
theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne _ _ s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
#align finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊂ s₂) : ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align finset.exists_of_ssubset Finset.exists_of_ssubset
instance isWellFounded_ssubset : IsWellFounded (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
Subrelation.isWellFounded (InvImage _ _) val_lt_iff.2
#align finset.is_well_founded_ssubset Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Finset α) :=
Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
#align finset.is_well_founded_lt Finset.wellFoundedLT
end Subset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
/-! ### Order embedding from `Finset α` to `Set α` -/
/-- Coercion to `Set α` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α :=
⟨⟨(↑), coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
#align finset.coe_emb Finset.coeEmb
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeEmb : ⇑(coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α) = ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_coe_emb Finset.coe_coeEmb
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.Nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def Nonempty (s : Finset α) : Prop := ∃ x : α, x ∈ s
#align finset.nonempty Finset.Nonempty
-- Porting note: Much longer than in Lean3
instance decidableNonempty {s : Finset α} : Decidable s.Nonempty :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (motive := fun s : Multiset α => Decidable (∃ a, a ∈ s)) s.1
(fun l : List α =>
match l with
| [] => isFalse <| by simp
| a::l => isTrue ⟨a, by simp⟩)
#align finset.decidable_nonempty Finset.decidableNonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonempty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_nonempty Finset.coe_nonempty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : Nonempty (s : Type _) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align finset.nonempty_coe_sort Finset.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.to_set⟩ := coe_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.to_set Finset.Nonempty.to_set
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align finset.nonempty.coe_sort Finset.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem Nonempty.exists_mem {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x : α, x ∈ s :=
h
#align finset.nonempty.bex Finset.Nonempty.exists_mem
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias Nonempty.bex := Nonempty.exists_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono {s t : Finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
Set.Nonempty.mono hst hs
#align finset.nonempty.mono Finset.Nonempty.mono
theorem Nonempty.forall_const {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) {p : Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s, p) ↔ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
⟨fun h => h x hx, fun h _ _ => h⟩
#align finset.nonempty.forall_const Finset.Nonempty.forall_const
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty s :=
nonempty_coe_sort.2
#align finset.nonempty.to_subtype Finset.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _hx⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align finset.nonempty.to_type Finset.Nonempty.to_type
/-! ### empty -/
section Empty
variable {s : Finset α}
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : Finset α :=
⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
#align finset.empty Finset.empty
instance : EmptyCollection (Finset α) :=
⟨Finset.empty⟩
instance inhabitedFinset : Inhabited (Finset α) :=
⟨∅⟩
#align finset.inhabited_finset Finset.inhabitedFinset
@[simp]
theorem empty_val : (∅ : Finset α).1 = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.empty_val Finset.empty_val
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : Finset α) := by
-- Porting note: was `id`. `a ∈ List.nil` is no longer definitionally equal to `False`
simp only [mem_def, empty_val, not_mem_zero, not_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_empty Finset.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Finset α).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => not_mem_empty x hx
#align finset.not_nonempty_empty Finset.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, nodup_zero⟩ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_zero Finset.mk_zero
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ := fun e =>
not_mem_empty a <| e ▸ h
#align finset.ne_empty_of_mem Finset.ne_empty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
(Exists.elim h) fun _a => ne_empty_of_mem
#align finset.nonempty.ne_empty Finset.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
zero_subset _
#align finset.empty_subset Finset.empty_subset
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
#align finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
-- Porting note: used `id`
⟨by rintro rfl x; apply not_mem_empty, fun h => eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
#align finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero {s : Finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
@val_inj _ s ∅
#align finset.val_eq_zero Finset.val_eq_zero
theorem subset_empty {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
#align finset.subset_empty Finset.subset_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_ssubset_empty (s : Finset α) : ¬s ⊂ ∅ := fun h =>
let ⟨_, he, _⟩ := exists_of_ssubset h
-- Porting note: was `he`
not_mem_empty _ he
#align finset.not_ssubset_empty Finset.not_ssubset_empty
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.Nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
#align finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
#align finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.not.trans not_not
#align finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
by_cases Or.inl fun h => Or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h)
#align finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_empty : ((∅ : Finset α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align finset.coe_empty Finset.coe_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by rw [← coe_empty, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_empty Finset.coe_eq_empty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : IsEmpty (s : Type _) ↔ s = ∅ := by
simpa using @Set.isEmpty_coe_sort α s
#align finset.is_empty_coe_sort Finset.isEmpty_coe_sort
instance instIsEmpty : IsEmpty (∅ : Finset α) :=
isEmpty_coe_sort.2 rfl
/-- A `Finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ :=
Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
#align finset.eq_empty_of_is_empty Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance : OrderBot (Finset α) where
bot := ∅
bot_le := empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.bot_eq_empty Finset.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Finset α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align finset.empty_ssubset Finset.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align finset.nonempty.empty_ssubset Finset.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
end Empty
/-! ### singleton -/
section Singleton
variable {s : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `{a} : Finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `DecidableEq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : Singleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).1 = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_val Finset.singleton_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Finset α) ↔ b = a :=
Multiset.mem_singleton
#align finset.mem_singleton Finset.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Finset α)) : x = y :=
mem_singleton.1 h
#align finset.eq_of_mem_singleton Finset.eq_of_mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : Finset α) ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr mem_singleton
#align finset.not_mem_singleton Finset.not_mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Finset α) :=
-- Porting note: was `Or.inl rfl`
mem_singleton.mpr rfl
#align finset.mem_singleton_self Finset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Finset α} : s.val = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← val_inj]
rfl
#align finset.val_eq_singleton_iff Finset.val_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Finset α) := fun _a _b h =>
mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _)
#align finset.singleton_injective Finset.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj : ({a} : Finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.singleton_inj Finset.singleton_inj
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
#align finset.singleton_nonempty Finset.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
#align finset.singleton_ne_empty Finset.singleton_ne_empty
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Finset α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align finset.empty_ssubset_singleton Finset.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : (({a} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_singleton Finset.coe_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (s : Set α) = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_singleton Finset.coe_eq_singleton
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_subset_singleton : (s : Set α) ⊆ {a} ↔ s ⊆ {a} := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
@[norm_cast]
lemma singleton_subset_coe : {a} ⊆ (s : Set α) ↔ {a} ⊆ s := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor <;> intro t
· rw [t]
exact ⟨Finset.mem_singleton_self _, fun _ => Finset.mem_singleton.1⟩
· ext
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨t.right _, fun r => r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· rintro ⟨hne, h_uniq⟩
rw [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem]
refine ⟨?_, h_uniq⟩
rw [← h_uniq hne.choose hne.choose_spec]
exact hne.choose_spec
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
theorem nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default [Unique α] {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty ↔ s = {default} := by
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default Finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
alias ⟨Nonempty.eq_singleton_default, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
#align finset.nonempty.eq_singleton_default Finset.Nonempty.eq_singleton_default
theorem singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : Finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s := by
simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, ExistsUnique]
#align finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem singleton_subset_set_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : ↑({a} : Finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [coe_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
#align finset.singleton_subset_set_iff Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
#align finset.singleton_subset_iff Finset.singleton_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton, Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq, coe_eq_empty, coe_eq_singleton]
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff Finset.subset_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Finset α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align finset.singleton_subset_singleton Finset.singleton_subset_singleton
protected theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align finset.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => mem_singleton
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff' Finset.subset_singleton_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_singleton, Set.ssubset_singleton_iff, coe_eq_empty]
#align finset.ssubset_singleton_iff Finset.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
/-- A finset is nontrivial if it has at least two elements. -/
protected abbrev Nontrivial (s : Finset α) : Prop := (s : Set α).Nontrivial
#align finset.nontrivial Finset.Nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_empty : ¬ (∅ : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_empty Finset.not_nontrivial_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_singleton : ¬ ({a} : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_singleton Finset.not_nontrivial_singleton
theorem Nontrivial.ne_singleton (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ {a} := by
rintro rfl; exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs
#align finset.nontrivial.ne_singleton Finset.Nontrivial.ne_singleton
nonrec lemma Nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.Nontrivial) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := hs.exists_ne _
theorem eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton]; exact Set.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha
#align finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨Nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
#align finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton Finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton
theorem Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.Nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.Nontrivial :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left <| Exists.intro a
#align finset.nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
instance instNontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Finset α) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨⟨{a}, ∅, singleton_ne_empty _⟩⟩
#align finset.nontrivial' Finset.instNontrivial
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Finset α) where
default := ∅
uniq _ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
instance (i : α) : Unique ({i} : Finset α) where
default := ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩
uniq j := Subtype.ext <| mem_singleton.mp j.2
@[simp]
lemma default_singleton (i : α) : ((default : ({i} : Finset α)) : α) = i := rfl
end Singleton
/-! ### cons -/
section Cons
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `DecidableEq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : Finset α :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
#align finset.cons Finset.cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {h} : b ∈ s.cons a h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons
#align finset.mem_cons Finset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Finset α} {hb : b ∉ s} (ha : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s hb :=
Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem ha
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) {h} : a ∈ cons a s h :=
Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _
#align finset.mem_cons_self Finset.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.cons_val Finset.cons_val
theorem forall_mem_cons (h : a ∉ s) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.forall_mem_cons Finset.forall_mem_cons
/-- Useful in proofs by induction. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_cons {p : α → Prop} {h : a ∉ s} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) (x)
(h : x ∈ s) : p x :=
H _ <| mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.forall_of_forall_cons Finset.forall_of_forall_cons
@[simp]
theorem mk_cons {s : Multiset α} (h : (a ::ₘ s).Nodup) :
(⟨a ::ₘ s, h⟩ : Finset α) = cons a ⟨s, (nodup_cons.1 h).2⟩ (nodup_cons.1 h).1 :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_cons Finset.mk_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_empty (a : α) : cons a ∅ (not_mem_empty _) = {a} := rfl
#align finset.cons_empty Finset.cons_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_cons.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩
#align finset.nonempty_cons Finset.nonempty_cons
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk {m : Multiset α} {hm} : (⟨m, hm⟩ : Finset α).Nonempty ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
induction m using Multiset.induction_on <;> simp
#align finset.nonempty_mk Finset.nonempty_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_cons {a s h} : (@cons α a s h : Set α) = insert a (s : Set α) := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_cons Finset.coe_cons
theorem subset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.subset_cons _ _
#align finset.subset_cons Finset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.ssubset_cons h
#align finset.ssubset_cons Finset.ssubset_cons
theorem cons_subset {h : a ∉ s} : s.cons a h ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
Multiset.cons_subset
#align finset.cons_subset Finset.cons_subset
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset_cons {hs ht} : s.cons a hs ⊆ t.cons a ht ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rwa [← coe_subset, coe_cons, coe_cons, Set.insert_subset_insert_iff, coe_subset]
#align finset.cons_subset_cons Finset.cons_subset_cons
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∉ s), s.cons a h ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset (ssubset_cons _) h⟩
obtain ⟨a, hs, ht⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, cons_subset.2 ⟨hs, h.subset⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset
end Cons
/-! ### disjoint -/
section Disjoint
variable {f : α → β} {s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
⟨fun h a hs ht => not_mem_empty a <|
singleton_subset_iff.mp (h (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hs) (singleton_subset_iff.mpr ht)),
fun h _ hs ht _ ha => (h (hs ha) (ht ha)).elim⟩
#align finset.disjoint_left Finset.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by
rw [_root_.disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align finset.disjoint_right Finset.disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b := by
simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
#align finset.disjoint_iff_ne Finset.disjoint_iff_ne
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_val : s.1.Disjoint t.1 ↔ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.disjoint_val Finset.disjoint_val
theorem _root_.Disjoint.forall_ne_finset (h : Disjoint s t) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : a ≠ b :=
disjoint_iff_ne.1 h _ ha _ hb
#align disjoint.forall_ne_finset Disjoint.forall_ne_finset
theorem not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
disjoint_left.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => by
rw [Classical.not_imp, not_not]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff Finset.not_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_left.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_left Finset.disjoint_of_subset_left
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_right.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_right.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_right Finset.disjoint_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_left (s : Finset α) : Disjoint ∅ s :=
disjoint_bot_left
#align finset.disjoint_empty_left Finset.disjoint_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_right (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s ∅ :=
disjoint_bot_right
#align finset.disjoint_empty_right Finset.disjoint_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint (singleton a) s ↔ a ∉ s := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_left Finset.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s (singleton a) ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_right Finset.disjoint_singleton_right
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Finset α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
rw [disjoint_singleton_left, mem_singleton]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton Finset.disjoint_singleton
theorem disjoint_self_iff_empty (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s s ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_self
#align finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty Finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem disjoint_coe : Disjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [Finset.disjoint_left, Set.disjoint_left, mem_coe]
#align finset.disjoint_coe Finset.disjoint_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_coe {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint (fun i => f i : ι → Set α) ↔ s.PairwiseDisjoint f :=
forall₅_congr fun _ _ _ _ _ => disjoint_coe
#align finset.pairwise_disjoint_coe Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_coe
end Disjoint
/-! ### disjoint union -/
/-- `disjUnion s t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`.
It is the same as `s ∪ t`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The hypothesis
ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) : Finset α :=
⟨s.1 + t.1, Multiset.nodup_add.2 ⟨s.2, t.2, disjoint_val.2 h⟩⟩
#align finset.disj_union Finset.disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjUnion {α s t h a} : a ∈ @disjUnion α s t h ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; rcases t with ⟨⟨t⟩⟩; apply List.mem_append
#align finset.mem_disj_union Finset.mem_disjUnion
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_disjUnion {s t : Finset α} (h : Disjoint s t) :
(disjUnion s t h : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem disjUnion_comm (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
disjUnion s t h = disjUnion t s h.symm :=
eq_of_veq <| add_comm _ _
#align finset.disj_union_comm Finset.disjUnion_comm
@[simp]
theorem empty_disjUnion (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint ∅ t := disjoint_bot_left) :
disjUnion ∅ t h = t :=
eq_of_veq <| zero_add _
#align finset.empty_disj_union Finset.empty_disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_empty (s : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right) :
disjUnion s ∅ h = s :=
eq_of_veq <| add_zero _
#align finset.disj_union_empty Finset.disjUnion_empty
theorem singleton_disjUnion (a : α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint {a} t) :
disjUnion {a} t h = cons a t (disjoint_singleton_left.mp h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_add _ _
#align finset.singleton_disj_union Finset.singleton_disjUnion
theorem disjUnion_singleton (s : Finset α) (a : α) (h : Disjoint s {a}) :
disjUnion s {a} h = cons a s (disjoint_singleton_right.mp h) := by
rw [disjUnion_comm, singleton_disjUnion]
#align finset.disj_union_singleton Finset.disjUnion_singleton
/-! ### insert -/
section Insert
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `insert a s` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. -/
instance : Insert α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩⟩
theorem insert_def (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩ :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_def Finset.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem insert_val (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = ndinsert a s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_val Finset.insert_val
theorem insert_val' (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = dedup (a ::ₘ s.1) := by
rw [dedup_cons, dedup_eq_self]; rfl
#align finset.insert_val' Finset.insert_val'
theorem insert_val_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 := by
rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.insert_val_of_not_mem Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert : a ∈ insert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
mem_ndinsert
#align finset.mem_insert Finset.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) : a ∈ insert a s :=
mem_ndinsert_self a s.1
#align finset.mem_insert_self Finset.mem_insert_self
theorem mem_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ insert b s :=
mem_ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.mem_insert_of_mem Finset.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (h : b ∈ insert a s) : b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
(mem_insert.1 h).resolve_left
#align finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (ha : b ∈ insert a s) (hb : b ∉ s) : b = a :=
(mem_insert.1 ha).resolve_right hb
#align finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
/-- A version of `LawfulSingleton.insert_emptyc_eq` that works with `dsimp`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF] lemma insert_empty : insert a (∅ : Finset α) = {a} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_eq_insert (a s h) : @cons α a s h = insert a s :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.cons_eq_insert Finset.cons_eq_insert
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : ↑(insert a s) = (insert a s : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_coe, mem_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff]
#align finset.coe_insert Finset.coe_insert
theorem mem_insert_coe {s : Finset α} {x y : α} : x ∈ insert y s ↔ x ∈ insert y (s : Set α) := by
simp
#align finset.mem_insert_coe Finset.mem_insert_coe
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => by ext; simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
eq_of_veq <| ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.insert_eq_of_mem Finset.insert_eq_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert_self _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align finset.insert_eq_self Finset.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align finset.insert_ne_self Finset.insert_ne_self
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : Finset α) = {a} :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_singleton_self _
#align finset.pair_eq_singleton Finset.pair_eq_singleton
theorem Insert.comm (a b : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, or_left_comm]
#align finset.insert.comm Finset.Insert.comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pair {a b : α} : (({a, b} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a, b} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_pair Finset.coe_pair
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_pair {s : Finset α} {a b : α} : (s : Set α) = {a, b} ↔ s = {a, b} := by
rw [← coe_pair, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_pair Finset.coe_eq_pair
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Finset α) = {b, a} :=
Insert.comm a b ∅
#align finset.pair_comm Finset.pair_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, ← or_assoc, or_self_iff]
#align finset.insert_idem Finset.insert_idem
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩
#align finset.insert_nonempty Finset.insert_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
(insert_nonempty a s).ne_empty
#align finset.insert_ne_empty Finset.insert_ne_empty
-- Porting note: explicit universe annotation is no longer required.
instance (i : α) (s : Finset α) : Nonempty ((insert i s : Finset α) : Set α) :=
(Finset.coe_nonempty.mpr (s.insert_nonempty i)).to_subtype
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem (s t : Finset α) {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ≠ insert a t := by
contrapose! h
simp [h]
#align finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem Finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, forall_eq, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.insert_subset Finset.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha,hs⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a s := fun _b => mem_insert_of_mem
#align finset.subset_insert Finset.subset_insert
@[gcongr]
theorem insert_subset_insert (a : α) {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
insert_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, Subset.trans h (subset_insert _ _)⟩
#align finset.insert_subset_insert Finset.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] lemma insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp_rw [← coe_subset]; simp [-coe_subset, ha]
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert_self _ _) ha, congr_arg (insert · s)⟩
#align finset.insert_inj Finset.insert_inj
theorem insert_inj_on (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn (fun a => insert a s) sᶜ := fun _ h _ _ =>
(insert_inj h).1
#align finset.insert_inj_on Finset.insert_inj_on
theorem ssubset_iff : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := mod_cast @Set.ssubset_iff_insert α s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff Finset.ssubset_iff
theorem ssubset_insert (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff.mpr ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align finset.ssubset_insert Finset.ssubset_insert
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (empty : p ∅)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : ∀ s, p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ => by
induction s using Multiset.induction with
| empty => exact empty
| cons a s IH =>
rw [mk_cons nd]
exact cons a _ _ (IH _)
#align finset.cons_induction Finset.cons_induction
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : p s :=
cons_induction h₁ h₂ s
#align finset.cons_induction_on Finset.cons_induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (empty : p ∅)
(insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : ∀ s, p s :=
cons_induction empty fun a s ha => (s.cons_eq_insert a ha).symm ▸ insert ha
#align finset.induction Finset.induction
/-- To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α)
(empty : p ∅) (insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
Finset.induction empty insert s
#align finset.induction_on Finset.induction_on
/-- To prove a proposition about `S : Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α ⊆ S`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element of `S`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (S : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Finset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) _ S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ has hqs hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 hs
h₂ hS sS has (hqs sS))
(Finset.Subset.refl S)
#align finset.induction_on' Finset.induction_on'
/-- To prove a proposition about a nonempty `s : Finset α`, it suffices to show it holds for all
singletons and that if it holds for nonempty `t : Finset α`, then it also holds for the `Finset`
obtained by inserting an element in `t`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Nonempty.cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : ∀ s : Finset α, s.Nonempty → Prop}
(singleton : ∀ a, p {a} (singleton_nonempty _))
(cons : ∀ a s (h : a ∉ s) (hs), p s hs → p (Finset.cons a s h) (nonempty_cons h))
{s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : p s hs := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => exact (not_nonempty_empty hs).elim
| cons a t ha h =>
obtain rfl | ht := t.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact singleton a
· exact cons a t ha ht (h ht)
#align finset.nonempty.cons_induction Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction
lemma Nonempty.exists_cons_eq (hs : s.Nonempty) : ∃ t a ha, cons a t ha = s :=
hs.cons_induction (fun a ↦ ⟨∅, a, _, cons_empty _⟩) fun _ _ _ _ _ ↦ ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩
/-- Inserting an element to a finite set is equivalent to the option type. -/
def subtypeInsertEquivOption {t : Finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
{ i // i ∈ insert x t } ≃ Option { i // i ∈ t } where
toFun y := if h : ↑y = x then none else some ⟨y, (mem_insert.mp y.2).resolve_left h⟩
invFun y := (y.elim ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ _⟩) fun z => ⟨z, mem_insert_of_mem z.2⟩
left_inv y := by
by_cases h : ↑y = x
· simp only [Subtype.ext_iff, h, Option.elim, dif_pos, Subtype.coe_mk]
· simp only [h, Option.elim, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_eta, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv := by
rintro (_ | y)
· simp only [Option.elim, dif_pos]
· have : ↑y ≠ x := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact h y.2
simp only [this, Option.elim, Subtype.eta, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align finset.subtype_insert_equiv_option Finset.subtypeInsertEquivOption
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_left : Disjoint (insert a s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_insert, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_left Finset.disjoint_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_right : Disjoint s (insert a t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_insert_left, _root_.disjoint_comm]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_right Finset.disjoint_insert_right
end Insert
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s ∪ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∪ t` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Union (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, t.2.ndunion s.1⟩⟩
/-- `s ∩ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∩ t` iff `a ∈ s` and `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Inter (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, s.2.ndinter t.1⟩⟩
instance : Lattice (Finset α) :=
{ Finset.partialOrder with
sup := (· ∪ ·)
sup_le := fun _ _ _ hs ht _ ha => (mem_ndunion.1 ha).elim (fun h => hs h) fun h => ht h
le_sup_left := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inl h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inr h
inf := (· ∩ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ht hu _ h => mem_ndinter.2 ⟨ht h, hu h⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).1
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).2 }
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : (Sup.sup : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Union.union :=
rfl
#align finset.sup_eq_union Finset.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : (Inf.inf : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Inter.inter :=
rfl
#align finset.inf_eq_inter Finset.inf_eq_inter
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
instance decidableDisjoint (U V : Finset α) : Decidable (Disjoint U V) :=
decidable_of_iff _ disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.decidable_disjoint Finset.decidableDisjoint
/-! #### union -/
theorem union_val_nd (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = ndunion s.1 t.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.union_val_nd Finset.union_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem union_val (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = s.1 ∪ t.1 :=
ndunion_eq_union s.2
#align finset.union_val Finset.union_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
mem_ndunion
#align finset.mem_union Finset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.disj_union_eq_union Finset.disjUnion_eq_union
theorem mem_union_left (t : Finset α) (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inl h
#align finset.mem_union_left Finset.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right (s : Finset α) (h : a ∈ t) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.mem_union_right Finset.mem_union_right
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s ∪ t, p a) ↔ (∀ a ∈ s, p a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ t, p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a => h a ∘ mem_union_left _, fun b => h b ∘ mem_union_right _⟩,
fun h _ab hab => (mem_union.mp hab).elim (h.1 _) (h.2 _)⟩
#align finset.forall_mem_union Finset.forall_mem_union
theorem not_mem_union : a ∉ s ∪ t ↔ a ∉ s ∧ a ∉ t := by rw [mem_union, not_or]
#align finset.not_mem_union Finset.not_mem_union
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∪ s₂) = (s₁ ∪ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_union
#align finset.coe_union Finset.coe_union
theorem union_subset (hs : s ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u → s ∪ t ⊆ u :=
sup_le <| le_iff_subset.2 hs
#align finset.union_subset Finset.union_subset
theorem subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_left _
#align finset.subset_union_left Finset.subset_union_left
theorem subset_union_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₂ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_right _
#align finset.subset_union_right Finset.subset_union_right
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union (hsu : s ⊆ u) (htv : t ⊆ v) : s ∪ t ⊆ u ∪ v :=
sup_le_sup (le_iff_subset.2 hsu) htv
#align finset.union_subset_union Finset.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align finset.union_subset_union_left Finset.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align finset.union_subset_union_right Finset.union_subset_union_right
theorem union_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ = s₂ ∪ s₁ := sup_comm _ _
#align finset.union_comm Finset.union_comm
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) := sup_assoc _ _ _
#align finset.union_assoc Finset.union_assoc
instance : Std.Associative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_idempotent (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s := sup_idem _
#align finset.union_idempotent Finset.union_idempotent
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_idempotent⟩
theorem union_subset_left (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u :=
subset_union_left.trans h
#align finset.union_subset_left Finset.union_subset_left
theorem union_subset_right {s t u : Finset α} (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u :=
Subset.trans subset_union_right h
#align finset.union_subset_right Finset.union_subset_right
theorem union_left_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_union, or_left_comm]
#align finset.union_left_comm Finset.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ t :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc, @or_comm (x ∈ t)]
#align finset.union_right_comm Finset.union_right_comm
theorem union_self (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s :=
union_idempotent s
#align finset.union_self Finset.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∪ ∅ = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.union_empty Finset.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∪ s = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_union Finset.empty_union
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inl {s t : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_left
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inr {s t : Finset α} (h : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_right
theorem insert_eq (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = {a} ∪ s :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_eq Finset.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem insert_union (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_assoc]
#align finset.insert_union Finset.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_left_comm]
#align finset.union_insert Finset.union_insert
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Finset α) :
insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t := by
simp only [insert_union, union_insert, insert_idem]
#align finset.insert_union_distrib Finset.insert_union_distrib
@[simp] lemma union_eq_left : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s := sup_eq_left
#align finset.union_eq_left_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_left
@[simp] lemma left_eq_union : s = s ∪ t ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_left]
#align finset.left_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.left_eq_union
@[simp] lemma union_eq_right : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t := sup_eq_right
#align finset.union_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_right
@[simp] lemma right_eq_union : s = t ∪ s ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_right]
#align finset.right_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.right_eq_union
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.union_congr_left Finset.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.union_congr_right Finset.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_left Finset.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_right Finset.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_left Finset.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_right Finset.disjoint_union_right
/-- To prove a relation on pairs of `Finset X`, it suffices to show that it is
* symmetric,
* it holds when one of the `Finset`s is empty,
* it holds for pairs of singletons,
* if it holds for `[a, c]` and for `[b, c]`, then it holds for `[a ∪ b, c]`.
-/
theorem induction_on_union (P : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) (symm : ∀ {a b}, P a b → P b a)
(empty_right : ∀ {a}, P a ∅) (singletons : ∀ {a b}, P {a} {b})
(union_of : ∀ {a b c}, P a c → P b c → P (a ∪ b) c) : ∀ a b, P a b := by
intro a b
refine Finset.induction_on b empty_right fun x s _xs hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
apply union_of _ (symm hi)
refine Finset.induction_on a empty_right fun a t _ta hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
exact union_of singletons (symm hi)
#align finset.induction_on_union Finset.induction_on_union
/-! #### inter -/
theorem inter_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = ndinter s₁.1 s₂.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.inter_val_nd Finset.inter_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem inter_val (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∩ s₂.1 :=
ndinter_eq_inter s₁.2
#align finset.inter_val Finset.inter_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ :=
mem_ndinter
#align finset.mem_inter Finset.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).1
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₂ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).2
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem mem_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
and_imp.1 mem_inter.2
#align finset.mem_inter_of_mem Finset.mem_inter_of_mem
theorem inter_subset_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₁ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_left
#align finset.inter_subset_left Finset.inter_subset_left
theorem inter_subset_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₂ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_right
#align finset.inter_subset_right Finset.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s₁ s₂ u : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊆ u → s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∩ u := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [subset_iff, mem_inter]
#align finset.subset_inter Finset.subset_inter
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∩ s₂) = (s₁ ∩ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_inter
#align finset.coe_inter Finset.coe_inter
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_left]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_left Finset.union_inter_cancel_left
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_right Finset.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₂ ∩ s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_comm]
#align finset.inter_comm Finset.inter_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_assoc]
#align finset.inter_assoc Finset.inter_assoc
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_left_comm]
#align finset.inter_left_comm Finset.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_right_comm]
#align finset.inter_right_comm Finset.inter_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (s : Finset α) : s ∩ s = s :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| and_self_iff
#align finset.inter_self Finset.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.inter_empty Finset.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∩ s = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_inter Finset.empty_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_self (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ s) = s := by
rw [inter_comm, union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.inter_union_self Finset.inter_union_self
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x = a ∨ x ∈ s₂ ↔ x ∈ s₂ := or_iff_right_of_imp <| by rintro rfl; exact h
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_left, this]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun x => by
have : ¬(x = a ∧ x ∈ s₂) := by rintro ⟨rfl, H⟩; exact h H
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_right, this, false_or_iff]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_not_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∈ s) : {a} ∩ s = {a} :=
show insert a ∅ ∩ s = insert a ∅ by rw [insert_inter_of_mem H, empty_inter]
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∉ s) : {a} ∩ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem <| by
simp only [mem_inter, mem_singleton]; rintro x ⟨rfl, h⟩; exact H h
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ {a} = {a} := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ {a} = ∅ := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_not_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_not_mem
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {x y s t : Finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) (h' : s ⊆ t) : x ∩ s ⊆ y ∩ t := by
intro a a_in
rw [Finset.mem_inter] at a_in ⊢
exact ⟨h a_in.1, h' a_in.2⟩
#align finset.inter_subset_inter Finset.inter_subset_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left (h : t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t ⊆ s ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl h
#align finset.inter_subset_inter_left Finset.inter_subset_inter_left
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter h Subset.rfl
#align finset.inter_subset_inter_right Finset.inter_subset_inter_right
theorem inter_subset_union : s ∩ t ⊆ s ∪ t :=
le_iff_subset.1 inf_le_sup
#align finset.inter_subset_union Finset.inter_subset_union
instance : DistribLattice (Finset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := fun a b c => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only
[sup_eq_union, inf_eq_inter, le_eq_subset, subset_iff, mem_inter, mem_union, and_imp,
or_imp, true_or_iff, imp_true_iff, true_and_iff, or_true_iff] }
@[simp]
theorem union_left_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ (s ∪ t) = s ∪ t := sup_left_idem _ _
#align finset.union_left_idem Finset.union_left_idem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem union_right_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ t = s ∪ t := sup_right_idem _ _
#align finset.union_right_idem Finset.union_right_idem
@[simp]
theorem inter_left_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (s ∩ t) = s ∩ t := inf_left_idem _ _
#align finset.inter_left_idem Finset.inter_left_idem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem inter_right_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ t = s ∩ t := inf_right_idem _ _
#align finset.inter_right_idem Finset.inter_right_idem
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align finset.inter_distrib_left Finset.inter_union_distrib_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align finset.inter_distrib_right Finset.union_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align finset.union_distrib_left Finset.union_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align finset.union_distrib_right Finset.inter_union_distrib_right
-- 2024-03-22
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_left := inter_union_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_right := union_inter_distrib_right
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_left := union_inter_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_right := inter_union_distrib_right
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_distrib_left Finset.union_union_distrib_left
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_distrib_right Finset.union_union_distrib_right
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_distrib_left Finset.inter_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_distrib_right Finset.inter_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_union_comm Finset.union_union_union_comm
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_inter_comm Finset.inter_inter_inter_comm
lemma union_eq_empty : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := sup_eq_bot_iff
#align finset.union_eq_empty_iff Finset.union_eq_empty
theorem union_subset_iff : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(sup_le_iff : s ⊔ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u)
#align finset.union_subset_iff Finset.union_subset_iff
theorem subset_inter_iff : s ⊆ t ∩ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ⊆ u :=
(le_inf_iff : s ≤ t ⊓ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u)
#align finset.subset_inter_iff Finset.subset_inter_iff
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
#align finset.inter_eq_left_iff_subset_iff_subset Finset.inter_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : t ∩ s = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_right
#align finset.inter_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.inter_eq_right
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.inter_congr_left Finset.inter_congr_left
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.inter_congr_right Finset.inter_congr_right
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
#align finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_left Finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
#align finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_right Finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_right
theorem ite_subset_union (s s' : Finset α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : ite P s s' ⊆ s ∪ s' :=
ite_le_sup s s' P
#align finset.ite_subset_union Finset.ite_subset_union
theorem inter_subset_ite (s s' : Finset α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : s ∩ s' ⊆ ite P s s' :=
inf_le_ite s s' P
#align finset.inter_subset_ite Finset.inter_subset_ite
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter Finset.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
#align finset.nonempty.not_disjoint Finset.Nonempty.not_disjoint
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 1,868 | 1,870 | theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by |
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Felix Weilacher
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Cardinality
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Perfect
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.Topology.CountableSeparatingOn
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.polish from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# The Borel sigma-algebra on Polish spaces
We discuss several results pertaining to the relationship between the topology and the Borel
structure on Polish spaces.
## Main definitions and results
First, we define standard Borel spaces.
* A `StandardBorelSpace α` is a typeclass for measurable spaces which arise as the Borel sets
of some Polish topology.
Next, we define the class of analytic sets and establish its basic properties.
* `MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet s`: a set in a topological space is analytic if it is the continuous
image of a Polish space. Equivalently, it is empty, or the image of `ℕ → ℕ`.
* `MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous`: a continuous image of an analytic set is
analytic.
* `MeasurableSet.analyticSet`: in a Polish space, any Borel-measurable set is analytic.
Then, we show Lusin's theorem that two disjoint analytic sets can be separated by Borel sets.
* `MeasurablySeparable s t` states that there exists a measurable set containing `s` and disjoint
from `t`.
* `AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable` shows that two disjoint analytic sets are separated by a
Borel set.
We then prove the Lusin-Souslin theorem that a continuous injective image of a Borel subset of
a Polish space is Borel. The proof of this nontrivial result relies on the above results on
analytic sets.
* `MeasurableSet.image_of_continuousOn_injOn` asserts that, if `s` is a Borel measurable set in
a Polish space, then the image of `s` under a continuous injective map is still Borel measurable.
* `Continuous.measurableEmbedding` states that a continuous injective map on a Polish space
is a measurable embedding for the Borel sigma-algebra.
* `ContinuousOn.measurableEmbedding` is the same result for a map restricted to a measurable set
on which it is continuous.
* `Measurable.measurableEmbedding` states that a measurable injective map from
a standard Borel space to a second-countable topological space is a measurable embedding.
* `isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`: in a Polish space, a set is clopenable (i.e., it can be made
open and closed by using a finer Polish topology) if and only if it is Borel-measurable.
We use this to prove several versions of the Borel isomorphism theorem.
* `PolishSpace.measurableEquivOfNotCountable` : Any two uncountable standard Borel spaces
are Borel isomorphic.
* `PolishSpace.Equiv.measurableEquiv` : Any two standard Borel spaces of the same cardinality
are Borel isomorphic.
-/
open Set Function PolishSpace PiNat TopologicalSpace Bornology Metric Filter Topology MeasureTheory
/-! ### Standard Borel Spaces -/
variable (α : Type*)
/-- A standard Borel space is a measurable space arising as the Borel sets of some Polish topology.
This is useful in situations where a space has no natural topology or
the natural topology in a space is non-Polish.
To endow a standard Borel space `α` with a compatible Polish topology, use
`letI := upgradeStandardBorel α`. One can then use `eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel α` to
rewrite the `MeasurableSpace α` instance to `borel α t`, where `t` is the new topology. -/
class StandardBorelSpace [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
/-- There exists a compatible Polish topology. -/
polish : ∃ _ : TopologicalSpace α, BorelSpace α ∧ PolishSpace α
/-- A convenience class similar to `UpgradedPolishSpace`. No instance should be registered.
Instead one should use `letI := upgradeStandardBorel α`. -/
class UpgradedStandardBorel extends MeasurableSpace α, TopologicalSpace α,
BorelSpace α, PolishSpace α
/-- Use as `letI := upgradeStandardBorel α` to endow a standard Borel space `α` with
a compatible Polish topology.
Warning: following this with `borelize α` will cause an error. Instead, one can
rewrite with `eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel α`.
TODO: fix the corresponding bug in `borelize`. -/
noncomputable
def upgradeStandardBorel [MeasurableSpace α] [h : StandardBorelSpace α] :
UpgradedStandardBorel α := by
choose τ hb hp using h.polish
constructor
/-- The `MeasurableSpace α` instance on a `StandardBorelSpace` `α` is equal to
the borel sets of `upgradeStandardBorel α`. -/
theorem eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel [MeasurableSpace α] [StandardBorelSpace α] :
‹MeasurableSpace α› = @borel _ (upgradeStandardBorel α).toTopologicalSpace :=
@BorelSpace.measurable_eq _ (upgradeStandardBorel α).toTopologicalSpace _
(upgradeStandardBorel α).toBorelSpace
variable {α}
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
instance standardBorel_of_polish [τ : TopologicalSpace α]
[BorelSpace α] [PolishSpace α] : StandardBorelSpace α := by exists τ
instance countablyGenerated_of_standardBorel [StandardBorelSpace α] :
MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated α :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
inferInstance
instance measurableSingleton_of_standardBorel [StandardBorelSpace α] : MeasurableSingletonClass α :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
inferInstance
namespace StandardBorelSpace
variable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β]
section instances
/-- A product of two standard Borel spaces is standard Borel. -/
instance prod [StandardBorelSpace α] [StandardBorelSpace β] : StandardBorelSpace (α × β) :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
letI := upgradeStandardBorel β
inferInstance
/-- A product of countably many standard Borel spaces is standard Borel. -/
instance pi_countable {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {α : ι → Type*} [∀ n, MeasurableSpace (α n)]
[∀ n, StandardBorelSpace (α n)] : StandardBorelSpace (∀ n, α n) :=
letI := fun n => upgradeStandardBorel (α n)
inferInstance
end instances
end StandardBorelSpace
end section
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-! ### Analytic sets -/
/-- An analytic set is a set which is the continuous image of some Polish space. There are several
equivalent characterizations of this definition. For the definition, we pick one that avoids
universe issues: a set is analytic if and only if it is a continuous image of `ℕ → ℕ` (or if it
is empty). The above more usual characterization is given
in `analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range`.
Warning: these are analytic sets in the context of descriptive set theory (which is why they are
registered in the namespace `MeasureTheory`). They have nothing to do with analytic sets in the
context of complex analysis. -/
irreducible_def AnalyticSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s = ∅ ∨ ∃ f : (ℕ → ℕ) → α, Continuous f ∧ range f = s
#align measure_theory.analytic_set MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet
theorem analyticSet_empty : AnalyticSet (∅ : Set α) := by
rw [AnalyticSet]
exact Or.inl rfl
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_empty MeasureTheory.analyticSet_empty
theorem analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PolishSpace β]
{f : β → α} (f_cont : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (range f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· rw [range_eq_empty]
exact analyticSet_empty
· rw [AnalyticSet]
obtain ⟨g, g_cont, hg⟩ : ∃ g : (ℕ → ℕ) → β, Continuous g ∧ Surjective g :=
exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective β
refine Or.inr ⟨f ∘ g, f_cont.comp g_cont, ?_⟩
rw [hg.range_comp]
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_range_of_polish_space MeasureTheory.analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace
/-- The image of an open set under a continuous map is analytic. -/
theorem _root_.IsOpen.analyticSet_image {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PolishSpace β]
{s : Set β} (hs : IsOpen s) {f : β → α} (f_cont : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) := by
rw [image_eq_range]
haveI : PolishSpace s := hs.polishSpace
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace (f_cont.comp continuous_subtype_val)
#align is_open.analytic_set_image IsOpen.analyticSet_image
/-- A set is analytic if and only if it is the continuous image of some Polish space. -/
theorem analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range {s : Set α} :
AnalyticSet s ↔
∃ (β : Type) (h : TopologicalSpace β) (_ : @PolishSpace β h) (f : β → α),
@Continuous _ _ h _ f ∧ range f = s := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [AnalyticSet] at h
cases' h with h h
· refine ⟨Empty, inferInstance, inferInstance, Empty.elim, continuous_bot, ?_⟩
rw [h]
exact range_eq_empty _
· exact ⟨ℕ → ℕ, inferInstance, inferInstance, h⟩
· rintro ⟨β, h, h', f, f_cont, f_range⟩
rw [← f_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace f_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_iff_exists_polish_space_range MeasureTheory.analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range
/-- The continuous image of an analytic set is analytic -/
theorem AnalyticSet.image_of_continuousOn {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
(hs : AnalyticSet s) {f : α → β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) := by
rcases analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 hs with ⟨γ, γtop, γpolish, g, g_cont, gs⟩
have : f '' s = range (f ∘ g) := by rw [range_comp, gs]
rw [this]
apply analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace
apply hf.comp_continuous g_cont fun x => _
rw [← gs]
exact mem_range_self
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.image_of_continuous_on MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuousOn
theorem AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
(hs : AnalyticSet s) {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.image_of_continuous MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous
/-- A countable intersection of analytic sets is analytic. -/
theorem AnalyticSet.iInter [hι : Nonempty ι] [Countable ι] [T2Space α] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, AnalyticSet (s n)) : AnalyticSet (⋂ n, s n) := by
rcases hι with ⟨i₀⟩
/- For the proof, write each `s n` as the continuous image under a map `f n` of a
Polish space `β n`. The product space `γ = Π n, β n` is also Polish, and so is the subset
`t` of sequences `x n` for which `f n (x n)` is independent of `n`. The set `t` is Polish, and
the range of `x ↦ f 0 (x 0)` on `t` is exactly `⋂ n, s n`, so this set is analytic. -/
choose β hβ h'β f f_cont f_range using fun n =>
analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 (hs n)
let γ := ∀ n, β n
let t : Set γ := ⋂ n, { x | f n (x n) = f i₀ (x i₀) }
have t_closed : IsClosed t := by
apply isClosed_iInter
intro n
exact
isClosed_eq ((f_cont n).comp (continuous_apply n)) ((f_cont i₀).comp (continuous_apply i₀))
haveI : PolishSpace t := t_closed.polishSpace
let F : t → α := fun x => f i₀ ((x : γ) i₀)
have F_cont : Continuous F := (f_cont i₀).comp ((continuous_apply i₀).comp continuous_subtype_val)
have F_range : range F = ⋂ n : ι, s n := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro y ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine mem_iInter.2 fun n => ?_
have : f n ((x : γ) n) = F x := (mem_iInter.1 x.2 n : _)
rw [← this, ← f_range n]
exact mem_range_self _
· intro y hy
have A : ∀ n, ∃ x : β n, f n x = y := by
intro n
rw [← mem_range, f_range n]
exact mem_iInter.1 hy n
choose x hx using A
have xt : x ∈ t := by
refine mem_iInter.2 fun n => ?_
simp [hx]
refine ⟨⟨x, xt⟩, ?_⟩
exact hx i₀
rw [← F_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace F_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.Inter MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.iInter
/-- A countable union of analytic sets is analytic. -/
theorem AnalyticSet.iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ n, AnalyticSet (s n)) :
AnalyticSet (⋃ n, s n) := by
/- For the proof, write each `s n` as the continuous image under a map `f n` of a
Polish space `β n`. The union space `γ = Σ n, β n` is also Polish, and the map `F : γ → α` which
coincides with `f n` on `β n` sends it to `⋃ n, s n`. -/
choose β hβ h'β f f_cont f_range using fun n =>
analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 (hs n)
let γ := Σn, β n
let F : γ → α := fun ⟨n, x⟩ ↦ f n x
have F_cont : Continuous F := continuous_sigma f_cont
have F_range : range F = ⋃ n, s n := by
simp only [γ, range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range, f_range]
rw [← F_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace F_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.Union MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.iUnion
theorem _root_.IsClosed.analyticSet [PolishSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) :
AnalyticSet s := by
haveI : PolishSpace s := hs.polishSpace
rw [← @Subtype.range_val α s]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace continuous_subtype_val
#align is_closed.analytic_set IsClosed.analyticSet
/-- Given a Borel-measurable set in a Polish space, there exists a finer Polish topology making
it clopen. This is in fact an equivalence, see `isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.isClopenable [PolishSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α]
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : IsClopenable s := by
revert s
apply MeasurableSet.induction_on_open
· exact fun u hu => hu.isClopenable
· exact fun u _ h'u => h'u.compl
· exact fun f _ _ hf => IsClopenable.iUnion hf
#align measurable_set.is_clopenable MeasurableSet.isClopenable
/-- A Borel-measurable set in a Polish space is analytic. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.analyticSet {α : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α]
[MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : AnalyticSet s := by
/- For a short proof (avoiding measurable induction), one sees `s` as a closed set for a finer
topology `t'`. It is analytic for this topology. As the identity from `t'` to `t` is continuous
and the image of an analytic set is analytic, it follows that `s` is also analytic for `t`. -/
obtain ⟨t', t't, t'_polish, s_closed, _⟩ :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' ∧ IsClosed[t'] s ∧ IsOpen[t'] s :=
hs.isClopenable
have A := @IsClosed.analyticSet α t' t'_polish s s_closed
convert @AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous α t' α t s A id (continuous_id_of_le t't)
simp only [id, image_id']
#align measurable_set.analytic_set MeasurableSet.analyticSet
/-- Given a Borel-measurable function from a Polish space to a second-countable space, there exists
a finer Polish topology on the source space for which the function is continuous. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.exists_continuous {α β : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α]
[MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[OpensMeasurableSpace β] {f : α → β} [SecondCountableTopology (range f)] (hf : Measurable f) :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, t' ≤ t ∧ @Continuous α β t' tβ f ∧ @PolishSpace α t' := by
obtain ⟨b, b_count, -, hb⟩ :
∃ b : Set (Set (range f)), b.Countable ∧ ∅ ∉ b ∧ IsTopologicalBasis b :=
exists_countable_basis (range f)
haveI : Countable b := b_count.to_subtype
have : ∀ s : b, IsClopenable (rangeFactorization f ⁻¹' s) := fun s ↦ by
apply MeasurableSet.isClopenable
exact hf.subtype_mk (hb.isOpen s.2).measurableSet
choose T Tt Tpolish _ Topen using this
obtain ⟨t', t'T, t't, t'_polish⟩ :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, (∀ i, t' ≤ T i) ∧ t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' :=
exists_polishSpace_forall_le (t := t) T Tt Tpolish
refine ⟨t', t't, ?_, t'_polish⟩
have : Continuous[t', _] (rangeFactorization f) :=
hb.continuous_iff.2 fun s hs => t'T ⟨s, hs⟩ _ (Topen ⟨s, hs⟩)
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp this
#align measurable.exists_continuous Measurable.exists_continuous
/-- The image of a measurable set in a standard Borel space under a measurable map
is an analytic set. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.analyticSet_image {X Y : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X]
[StandardBorelSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace Y] {f : X → Y} [SecondCountableTopology (range f)] {s : Set X}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Measurable f) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) := by
letI := upgradeStandardBorel X
rw [eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel X] at hs
rcases hf.exists_continuous with ⟨τ', hle, hfc, hτ'⟩
letI m' : MeasurableSpace X := @borel _ τ'
haveI b' : BorelSpace X := ⟨rfl⟩
have hle := borel_anti hle
exact (hle _ hs).analyticSet.image_of_continuous hfc
#align measurable_set.analytic_set_image MeasurableSet.analyticSet_image
/-- Preimage of an analytic set is an analytic set. -/
protected lemma AnalyticSet.preimage {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[PolishSpace X] [T2Space Y] {s : Set Y} (hs : AnalyticSet s) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
AnalyticSet (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rcases analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 hs with ⟨Z, _, _, g, hg, rfl⟩
have : IsClosed {x : X × Z | f x.1 = g x.2} := isClosed_diagonal.preimage (hf.prod_map hg)
convert this.analyticSet.image_of_continuous continuous_fst
ext x
simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Separating sets with measurable sets -/
/-- Two sets `u` and `v` in a measurable space are measurably separable if there
exists a measurable set containing `u` and disjoint from `v`.
This is mostly interesting for Borel-separable sets. -/
def MeasurablySeparable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (s t : Set α) : Prop :=
∃ u, s ⊆ u ∧ Disjoint t u ∧ MeasurableSet u
#align measure_theory.measurably_separable MeasureTheory.MeasurablySeparable
theorem MeasurablySeparable.iUnion [Countable ι] {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ m n, MeasurablySeparable (s m) (t n)) : MeasurablySeparable (⋃ n, s n) (⋃ m, t m) := by
choose u hsu htu hu using h
refine ⟨⋃ m, ⋂ n, u m n, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine iUnion_subset fun m => subset_iUnion_of_subset m ?_
exact subset_iInter fun n => hsu m n
· simp_rw [disjoint_iUnion_left, disjoint_iUnion_right]
intro n m
apply Disjoint.mono_right _ (htu m n)
apply iInter_subset
· refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun m => ?_
exact MeasurableSet.iInter fun n => hu m n
#align measure_theory.measurably_separable.Union MeasureTheory.MeasurablySeparable.iUnion
/-- The hard part of the Lusin separation theorem saying that two disjoint analytic sets are
contained in disjoint Borel sets (see the full statement in `AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable`).
Here, we prove this when our analytic sets are the ranges of functions from `ℕ → ℕ`.
-/
theorem measurablySeparable_range_of_disjoint [T2Space α] [MeasurableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] {f g : (ℕ → ℕ) → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g)
(h : Disjoint (range f) (range g)) : MeasurablySeparable (range f) (range g) := by
/- We follow [Kechris, *Classical Descriptive Set Theory* (Theorem 14.7)][kechris1995].
If the ranges are not Borel-separated, then one can find two cylinders of length one whose
images are not Borel-separated, and then two smaller cylinders of length two whose images are
not Borel-separated, and so on. One thus gets two sequences of cylinders, that decrease to two
points `x` and `y`. Their images are different by the disjointness assumption, hence contained
in two disjoint open sets by the T2 property. By continuity, long enough cylinders around `x`
and `y` have images which are separated by these two disjoint open sets, a contradiction.
-/
by_contra hfg
have I : ∀ n x y, ¬MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder x n) (g '' cylinder y n) →
∃ x' y', x' ∈ cylinder x n ∧ y' ∈ cylinder y n ∧
¬MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder x' (n + 1)) (g '' cylinder y' (n + 1)) := by
intro n x y
contrapose!
intro H
rw [← iUnion_cylinder_update x n, ← iUnion_cylinder_update y n, image_iUnion, image_iUnion]
refine MeasurablySeparable.iUnion fun i j => ?_
exact H _ _ (update_mem_cylinder _ _ _) (update_mem_cylinder _ _ _)
-- consider the set of pairs of cylinders of some length whose images are not Borel-separated
let A :=
{ p : ℕ × (ℕ → ℕ) × (ℕ → ℕ) //
¬MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder p.2.1 p.1) (g '' cylinder p.2.2 p.1) }
-- for each such pair, one can find longer cylinders whose images are not Borel-separated either
have : ∀ p : A, ∃ q : A,
q.1.1 = p.1.1 + 1 ∧ q.1.2.1 ∈ cylinder p.1.2.1 p.1.1 ∧ q.1.2.2 ∈ cylinder p.1.2.2 p.1.1 := by
rintro ⟨⟨n, x, y⟩, hp⟩
rcases I n x y hp with ⟨x', y', hx', hy', h'⟩
exact ⟨⟨⟨n + 1, x', y'⟩, h'⟩, rfl, hx', hy'⟩
choose F hFn hFx hFy using this
let p0 : A := ⟨⟨0, fun _ => 0, fun _ => 0⟩, by simp [hfg]⟩
-- construct inductively decreasing sequences of cylinders whose images are not separated
let p : ℕ → A := fun n => F^[n] p0
have prec : ∀ n, p (n + 1) = F (p n) := fun n => by simp only [p, iterate_succ', Function.comp]
-- check that at the `n`-th step we deal with cylinders of length `n`
have pn_fst : ∀ n, (p n).1.1 = n := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
· simp only [prec, hFn, IH]
-- check that the cylinders we construct are indeed decreasing, by checking that the coordinates
-- are stationary.
have Ix : ∀ m n, m + 1 ≤ n → (p n).1.2.1 m = (p (m + 1)).1.2.1 m := by
intro m
apply Nat.le_induction
· rfl
intro n hmn IH
have I : (F (p n)).val.snd.fst m = (p n).val.snd.fst m := by
apply hFx (p n) m
rw [pn_fst]
exact hmn
rw [prec, I, IH]
have Iy : ∀ m n, m + 1 ≤ n → (p n).1.2.2 m = (p (m + 1)).1.2.2 m := by
intro m
apply Nat.le_induction
· rfl
intro n hmn IH
have I : (F (p n)).val.snd.snd m = (p n).val.snd.snd m := by
apply hFy (p n) m
rw [pn_fst]
exact hmn
rw [prec, I, IH]
-- denote by `x` and `y` the limit points of these two sequences of cylinders.
set x : ℕ → ℕ := fun n => (p (n + 1)).1.2.1 n with hx
set y : ℕ → ℕ := fun n => (p (n + 1)).1.2.2 n with hy
-- by design, the cylinders around these points have images which are not Borel-separable.
have M : ∀ n, ¬MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder x n) (g '' cylinder y n) := by
intro n
convert (p n).2 using 3
· rw [pn_fst, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq, mem_cylinder_iff]
intro i hi
rw [hx]
exact (Ix i n hi).symm
· rw [pn_fst, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq, mem_cylinder_iff]
intro i hi
rw [hy]
exact (Iy i n hi).symm
-- consider two open sets separating `f x` and `g y`.
obtain ⟨u, v, u_open, v_open, xu, yv, huv⟩ :
∃ u v : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ f x ∈ u ∧ g y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v := by
apply t2_separation
exact disjoint_iff_forall_ne.1 h (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _)
letI : MetricSpace (ℕ → ℕ) := metricSpaceNatNat
obtain ⟨εx, εxpos, hεx⟩ : ∃ (εx : ℝ), εx > 0 ∧ Metric.ball x εx ⊆ f ⁻¹' u := by
apply Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1
exact hf.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds (u_open.mem_nhds xu)
obtain ⟨εy, εypos, hεy⟩ : ∃ (εy : ℝ), εy > 0 ∧ Metric.ball y εy ⊆ g ⁻¹' v := by
apply Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1
exact hg.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds yv)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < min εx εy :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (lt_min εxpos εypos) (by norm_num)
-- for large enough `n`, these open sets separate the images of long cylinders around `x` and `y`
have B : MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder x n) (g '' cylinder y n) := by
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, u_open.measurableSet⟩
· rw [image_subset_iff]
apply Subset.trans _ hεx
intro z hz
rw [mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le] at hz
exact hz.trans_lt (hn.trans_le (min_le_left _ _))
· refine Disjoint.mono_left ?_ huv.symm
change g '' cylinder y n ⊆ v
rw [image_subset_iff]
apply Subset.trans _ hεy
intro z hz
rw [mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le] at hz
exact hz.trans_lt (hn.trans_le (min_le_right _ _))
-- this is a contradiction.
exact M n B
#align measure_theory.measurably_separable_range_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.measurablySeparable_range_of_disjoint
/-- The **Lusin separation theorem**: if two analytic sets are disjoint, then they are contained in
disjoint Borel sets. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Polish.lean | 509 | 517 | theorem AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable [T2Space α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{s t : Set α} (hs : AnalyticSet s) (ht : AnalyticSet t) (h : Disjoint s t) :
MeasurablySeparable s t := by |
rw [AnalyticSet] at hs ht
rcases hs with (rfl | ⟨f, f_cont, rfl⟩)
· refine ⟨∅, Subset.refl _, by simp, MeasurableSet.empty⟩
rcases ht with (rfl | ⟨g, g_cont, rfl⟩)
· exact ⟨univ, subset_univ _, by simp, MeasurableSet.univ⟩
exact measurablySeparable_range_of_disjoint f_cont g_cont h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.kernels from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"956af7c76589f444f2e1313911bad16366ea476d"
/-!
# Kernels and cokernels
In a category with zero morphisms, the kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` is
the equalizer of `f` and `0 : X ⟶ Y`. (Similarly the cokernel is the coequalizer.)
The basic definitions are
* `kernel : (X ⟶ Y) → C`
* `kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X`
* `kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0` and
* `kernel.lift (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f` (as well as the dual versions)
## Main statements
Besides the definition and lifts, we prove
* `kernel.ιZeroIsIso`: a kernel map of a zero morphism is an isomorphism
* `kernel.eq_zero_of_epi_kernel`: if `kernel.ι f` is an epimorphism, then `f = 0`
* `kernel.ofMono`: the kernel of a monomorphism is the zero object
* `kernel.liftMono`: the lift of a monomorphism `k : W ⟶ X` such that `k ≫ f = 0`
is still a monomorphism
* `kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone`: if our category has a zero object, then the map from the zero
object is a kernel map of any monomorphism
* `kernel.ιOfZero`: `kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)` is an isomorphism
and the corresponding dual statements.
## Future work
* TODO: connect this with existing work in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
## Implementation notes
As with the other special shapes in the limits library, all the definitions here are given as
`abbreviation`s of the general statements for limits, so all the `simp` lemmas and theorems about
general limits can be used.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
universe v v₂ u u' u₂
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- A morphism `f` has a kernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a limit. -/
abbrev HasKernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasLimit (parallelPair f 0)
#align category_theory.limits.has_kernel CategoryTheory.Limits.HasKernel
/-- A morphism `f` has a cokernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a colimit. -/
abbrev HasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasColimit (parallelPair f 0)
#align category_theory.limits.has_cokernel CategoryTheory.Limits.HasCokernel
variable {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
section
/-- A kernel fork is just a fork where the second morphism is a zero morphism. -/
abbrev KernelFork :=
Fork f 0
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_fork CategoryTheory.Limits.KernelFork
variable {f}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem KernelFork.condition (s : KernelFork f) : Fork.ι s ≫ f = 0 := by
erw [Fork.condition, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_fork.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.KernelFork.condition
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this, removed simp tag
theorem KernelFork.app_one (s : KernelFork f) : s.π.app one = 0 := by
simp [Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_fork.app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.KernelFork.app_one
/-- A morphism `ι` satisfying `ι ≫ f = 0` determines a kernel fork over `f`. -/
abbrev KernelFork.ofι {Z : C} (ι : Z ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) : KernelFork f :=
Fork.ofι ι <| by rw [w, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_fork.of_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.KernelFork.ofι
@[simp]
theorem KernelFork.ι_ofι {X Y P : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) :
Fork.ι (KernelFork.ofι ι w) = ι := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_fork.ι_of_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.KernelFork.ι_ofι
section
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy nor case_bash
/-- Every kernel fork `s` is isomorphic (actually, equal) to `fork.ofι (fork.ι s) _`. -/
def isoOfι (s : Fork f 0) : s ≅ Fork.ofι (Fork.ι s) (Fork.condition s) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by rintro ⟨j⟩ <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_of_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.isoOfι
/-- If `ι = ι'`, then `fork.ofι ι _` and `fork.ofι ι' _` are isomorphic. -/
def ofιCongr {P : C} {ι ι' : P ⟶ X} {w : ι ≫ f = 0} (h : ι = ι') :
KernelFork.ofι ι w ≅ KernelFork.ofι ι' (by rw [← h, w]) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _)
#align category_theory.limits.of_ι_congr CategoryTheory.Limits.ofιCongr
/-- If `F` is an equivalence, then applying `F` to a diagram indexing a (co)kernel of `f` yields
the diagram indexing the (co)kernel of `F.map f`. -/
def compNatIso {D : Type u'} [Category.{v} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (F : C ⥤ D) [F.IsEquivalence] :
parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F ≅ parallelPair (F.map f) 0 :=
let app (j :WalkingParallelPair) :
(parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F).obj j ≅ (parallelPair (F.map f) 0).obj j :=
match j with
| zero => Iso.refl _
| one => Iso.refl _
NatIso.ofComponents app <| by rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ <;> intro g <;> cases g <;> simp [app]
#align category_theory.limits.comp_nat_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.compNatIso
end
/-- If `s` is a limit kernel fork and `k : W ⟶ X` satisfies `k ≫ f = 0`, then there is some
`l : W ⟶ s.X` such that `l ≫ fork.ι s = k`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' {s : KernelFork f} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X)
(h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ Fork.ι s = k } :=
⟨hs.lift <| KernelFork.ofι _ h, hs.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_fork.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.KernelFork.IsLimit.lift'
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a kernel fork is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isLimitAux (t : KernelFork f) (lift : ∀ s : KernelFork f, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : KernelFork f, lift s ≫ t.ι = s.ι)
(uniq : ∀ (s : KernelFork f) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : m ≫ t.ι = s.ι), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => by
cases j
· exact fac s
· simp
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w Limits.WalkingParallelPair.zero) }
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_aux CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitAux
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` constructed using
`KernelFork.ofι` is a limit cone.
-/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) (eq : g ≫ f = 0)
(lift : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (_ : g' ≫ f = 0), W' ⟶ W)
(fac : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0), lift g' eq' ≫ g = g')
(uniq :
∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0) (m : W' ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ g = g'), m = lift g' eq') :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι g eq) :=
isLimitAux _ (fun s => lift s.ι s.condition) (fun s => fac s.ι s.condition) fun s =>
uniq s.ι s.condition
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_fork.is_limit.of_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` of the form
`KernelFork.ofι i _` is a limit cone when we know that `i` is a monomorphism. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι' {X Y K : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (i : K ⟶ X) (w : i ≫ f = 0)
(h : ∀ {A : C} (k : A ⟶ X) (_ : k ≫ f = 0), { l : A ⟶ K // l ≫ i = k}) [hi : Mono i] :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i w) :=
ofι _ _ (fun {A} k hk => (h k hk).1) (fun {A} k hk => (h k hk).2) (fun {A} k hk m hm => by
rw [← cancel_mono i, (h k hk).2, hm])
/-- Every kernel of `f` induces a kernel of `f ≫ g` if `g` is mono. -/
def isKernelCompMono {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g] {h : X ⟶ Z}
(hh : h = f ≫ g) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι (by simp [hh]) : KernelFork h) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
let s' : KernelFork f := Fork.ofι s.ι (by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp [← hh, s.condition])
let l := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' i s'.ι s'.condition
⟨l.1, l.2, fun hm => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; rw [Fork.ι_ofι] at hm; rw [hm]; exact l.2.symm⟩
#align category_theory.limits.is_kernel_comp_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.isKernelCompMono
theorem isKernelCompMono_lift {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g]
{h : X ⟶ Z} (hh : h = f ≫ g) (s : KernelFork h) :
(isKernelCompMono i g hh).lift s = i.lift (Fork.ofι s.ι (by
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, ← hh]
simp)) := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.is_kernel_comp_mono_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.isKernelCompMono_lift
/-- Every kernel of `f ≫ g` is also a kernel of `f`, as long as `c.ι ≫ f` vanishes. -/
def isKernelOfComp {W : C} (g : Y ⟶ W) (h : X ⟶ W) {c : KernelFork h} (i : IsLimit c)
(hf : c.ι ≫ f = 0) (hfg : f ≫ g = h) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι hf) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => i.lift (KernelFork.ofι s.ι (by simp [← hfg])))
(fun s => by simp only [KernelFork.ι_ofι, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι]) fun s m h => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; simpa using h
#align category_theory.limits.is_kernel_of_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.isKernelOfComp
/-- `X` identifies to the kernel of a zero map `X ⟶ Y`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : f = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (𝟙 X) (show 𝟙 X ≫ f = 0 by rw [hf, comp_zero])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun x _ => x) (fun _ _ => Category.comp_id _)
(fun _ _ _ hb => by simp only [← hb, Category.comp_id])
/-- Any zero object identifies to the kernel of a given monomorphisms. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hf : Mono f) (h : IsZero c.pt) : IsLimit c :=
isLimitAux _ (fun s => 0) (fun s => by rw [zero_comp, ← cancel_mono f, zero_comp, s.condition])
(fun _ _ _ => h.eq_of_tgt _ _)
lemma KernelFork.IsLimit.isIso_ι {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hc : IsLimit c) (hf : f = 0) : IsIso c.ι := by
let e : c.pt ≅ X := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId (f : X ⟶ Y) hf)
have eq : e.inv ≫ c.ι = 𝟙 X := Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hc
haveI : IsIso (e.inv ≫ c.ι) := by
rw [eq]
infer_instance
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left e.inv c.ι
end
namespace KernelFork
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
/-- The morphism between points of kernel forks induced by a morphism
in the category of arrows. -/
def mapOfIsLimit (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ⟶ kf'.pt :=
hf'.lift (KernelFork.ofι (kf.ι ≫ φ.left) (by simp))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma mapOfIsLimit_ι (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ ≫ kf'.ι = kf.ι ≫ φ.left :=
hf'.fac _ _
/-- The isomorphism between points of limit kernel forks induced by an isomorphism
in the category of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def mapIsoOfIsLimit {kf : KernelFork f} {kf' : KernelFork f'}
(hf : IsLimit kf) (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ≅ kf'.pt where
hom := kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ.hom
inv := kf'.mapOfIsLimit hf φ.inv
hom_inv_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf (by simp)
inv_hom_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf' (by simp)
end KernelFork
section
variable [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism, expressed as the equalizer with the 0 morphism. -/
abbrev kernel (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] : C :=
equalizer f 0
#align category_theory.limits.kernel CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel
/-- The map from `kernel f` into the source of `f`. -/
abbrev kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X :=
equalizer.ι f 0
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.ι CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.ι
@[simp]
theorem equalizer_as_kernel : equalizer.ι f 0 = kernel.ι f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_as_kernel CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizer_as_kernel
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0 :=
KernelFork.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.condition
/-- The kernel built from `kernel.ι f` is limiting. -/
def kernelIsKernel : IsLimit (Fork.ofι (kernel.ι f) ((kernel.condition f).trans comp_zero.symm)) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (limit.isLimit _) (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat))
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_is_kernel CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelIsKernel
/-- Given any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0`, `k` factors through `kernel.ι f`
via `kernel.lift : W ⟶ kernel f`. -/
abbrev kernel.lift {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f :=
(kernelIsKernel f).lift (KernelFork.ofι k h)
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.lift
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.lift_ι {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : kernel.lift f k h ≫ kernel.ι f = k :=
(kernelIsKernel f).fac (KernelFork.ofι k h) WalkingParallelPair.zero
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.lift_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.lift_ι
@[simp]
theorem kernel.lift_zero {W : C} {h} : kernel.lift f (0 : W ⟶ X) h = 0 := by
ext; simp
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.lift_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.lift_zero
instance kernel.lift_mono {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) [Mono k] : Mono (kernel.lift f k h) :=
⟨fun {Z} g g' w => by
replace w := w =≫ kernel.ι f
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.lift_ι] at w
exact (cancel_mono k).1 w⟩
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.lift_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.lift_mono
/-- Any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ kernel f` such that
`l ≫ kernel.ι f = k`. -/
def kernel.lift' {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ kernel f // l ≫ kernel.ι f = k } :=
⟨kernel.lift f k h, kernel.lift_ι _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.lift'
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism of kernels. -/
abbrev kernel.map {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(w : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') : kernel f ⟶ kernel f' :=
kernel.lift f' (kernel.ι f ≫ p) (by simp [← w])
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.map CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.map
/-- Given a commutative diagram
X --f--> Y --g--> Z
| | |
| | |
v v v
X' -f'-> Y' -g'-> Z'
with horizontal arrows composing to zero,
then we obtain a commutative square
X ---> kernel g
| |
| | kernel.map
| |
v v
X' --> kernel g'
-/
theorem kernel.lift_map {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel g] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(f' : X' ⟶ Y') (g' : Y' ⟶ Z') [HasKernel g'] (w' : f' ≫ g' = 0) (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(r : Z ⟶ Z') (h₁ : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (h₂ : g ≫ r = q ≫ g') :
kernel.lift g f w ≫ kernel.map g g' q r h₂ = p ≫ kernel.lift g' f' w' := by
ext; simp [h₁]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.lift_map CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.lift_map
/-- A commuting square of isomorphisms induces an isomorphism of kernels. -/
@[simps]
def kernel.mapIso {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ≅ X') (q : Y ≅ Y')
(w : f ≫ q.hom = p.hom ≫ f') : kernel f ≅ kernel f' where
hom := kernel.map f f' p.hom q.hom w
inv :=
kernel.map f' f p.inv q.inv
(by
refine (cancel_mono q.hom).1 ?_
simp [w])
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.map_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.mapIso
/-- Every kernel of the zero morphism is an isomorphism -/
instance kernel.ι_zero_isIso : IsIso (kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :=
equalizer.ι_of_self _
#align category_theory.limits.kernel.ι_zero_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.kernel.ι_zero_isIso
theorem eq_zero_of_epi_kernel [Epi (kernel.ι f)] : f = 0 :=
(cancel_epi (kernel.ι f)).1 (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.eq_zero_of_epi_kernel CategoryTheory.Limits.eq_zero_of_epi_kernel
/-- The kernel of a zero morphism is isomorphic to the source. -/
def kernelZeroIsoSource : kernel (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≅ X :=
equalizer.isoSourceOfSelf 0
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_zero_iso_source CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelZeroIsoSource
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_hom : kernelZeroIsoSource.hom = kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y) := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_zero_iso_source_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelZeroIsoSource_hom
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_inv :
kernelZeroIsoSource.inv = kernel.lift (0 : X ⟶ Y) (𝟙 X) (by simp) := by
ext
simp [kernelZeroIsoSource]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_zero_iso_source_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelZeroIsoSource_inv
/-- If two morphisms are known to be equal, then their kernels are isomorphic. -/
def kernelIsoOfEq {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) : kernel f ≅ kernel g :=
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (by rw [h])
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_iso_of_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelIsoOfEq
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_refl {h : f = f} : kernelIsoOfEq h = Iso.refl (kernel f) := by
ext
simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_iso_of_eq_refl CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelIsoOfEq_refl
/- Porting note: induction on Eq is trying instantiate another g... -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_hom_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ kernel.ι g = kernel.ι f := by
cases h; simp
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_iso_of_eq_hom_comp_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelIsoOfEq_hom_comp_ι
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_inv_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ kernel.ι _ = kernel.ι _ := by
cases h; simp
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_iso_of_eq_inv_comp_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelIsoOfEq_inv_comp_ι
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_hom {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).hom = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [← h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
#align category_theory.limits.lift_comp_kernel_iso_of_eq_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_inv {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).inv = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
#align category_theory.limits.lift_comp_kernel_iso_of_eq_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_inv
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Kernels.lean | 414 | 416 | theorem kernelIsoOfEq_trans {f g h : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] [HasKernel h] (w₁ : f = g)
(w₂ : g = h) : kernelIsoOfEq w₁ ≪≫ kernelIsoOfEq w₂ = kernelIsoOfEq (w₁.trans w₂) := by |
cases w₁; cases w₂; ext; simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Tropical.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
#align_import algebra.tropical.big_operators from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
/-!
# Tropicalization of finitary operations
This file provides the "big-op" or notation-based finitary operations on tropicalized types.
This allows easy conversion between sums to Infs and prods to sums. Results here are important
for expressing that evaluation of tropical polynomials are the minimum over a finite piecewise
collection of linear functions.
## Main declarations
* `untrop_sum`
## Implementation notes
No concrete (semi)ring is used here, only ones with inferrable order/lattice structure, to support
`Real`, `Rat`, `EReal`, and others (`ERat` is not yet defined).
Minima over `List α` are defined as producing a value in `WithTop α` so proofs about lists do not
directly transfer to minima over multisets or finsets.
-/
variable {R S : Type*}
open Tropical Finset
theorem List.trop_sum [AddMonoid R] (l : List R) : trop l.sum = List.prod (l.map trop) := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· simp [← IH]
#align list.trop_sum List.trop_sum
theorem Multiset.trop_sum [AddCommMonoid R] (s : Multiset R) :
trop s.sum = Multiset.prod (s.map trop) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s (by simpa using List.trop_sum)
#align multiset.trop_sum Multiset.trop_sum
theorem trop_sum [AddCommMonoid R] (s : Finset S) (f : S → R) :
trop (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, trop (f i) := by
convert Multiset.trop_sum (s.val.map f)
simp only [Multiset.map_map, Function.comp_apply]
rfl
#align trop_sum trop_sum
theorem List.untrop_prod [AddMonoid R] (l : List (Tropical R)) :
untrop l.prod = List.sum (l.map untrop) := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· simp [← IH]
#align list.untrop_prod List.untrop_prod
theorem Multiset.untrop_prod [AddCommMonoid R] (s : Multiset (Tropical R)) :
untrop s.prod = Multiset.sum (s.map untrop) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s (by simpa using List.untrop_prod)
#align multiset.untrop_prod Multiset.untrop_prod
theorem untrop_prod [AddCommMonoid R] (s : Finset S) (f : S → Tropical R) :
untrop (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, untrop (f i) := by
convert Multiset.untrop_prod (s.val.map f)
simp only [Multiset.map_map, Function.comp_apply]
rfl
#align untrop_prod untrop_prod
-- Porting note: replaced `coe` with `WithTop.some` in statement
theorem List.trop_minimum [LinearOrder R] (l : List R) :
trop l.minimum = List.sum (l.map (trop ∘ WithTop.some)) := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· simp [List.minimum_cons, ← IH]
#align list.trop_minimum List.trop_minimum
theorem Multiset.trop_inf [LinearOrder R] [OrderTop R] (s : Multiset R) :
trop s.inf = Multiset.sum (s.map trop) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction with s x IH
· simp
· simp [← IH]
#align multiset.trop_inf Multiset.trop_inf
theorem Finset.trop_inf [LinearOrder R] [OrderTop R] (s : Finset S) (f : S → R) :
trop (s.inf f) = ∑ i ∈ s, trop (f i) := by
convert Multiset.trop_inf (s.val.map f)
simp only [Multiset.map_map, Function.comp_apply]
rfl
#align finset.trop_inf Finset.trop_inf
theorem trop_sInf_image [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder R] (s : Finset S) (f : S → WithTop R) :
trop (sInf (f '' s)) = ∑ i ∈ s, trop (f i) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | h)
· simp only [Set.image_empty, coe_empty, sum_empty, WithTop.sInf_empty, trop_top]
rw [← inf'_eq_csInf_image _ h, inf'_eq_inf, s.trop_inf]
#align trop_Inf_image trop_sInf_image
theorem trop_iInf [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder R] [Fintype S] (f : S → WithTop R) :
trop (⨅ i : S, f i) = ∑ i : S, trop (f i) := by
rw [iInf, ← Set.image_univ, ← coe_univ, trop_sInf_image]
#align trop_infi trop_iInf
theorem Multiset.untrop_sum [LinearOrder R] [OrderTop R] (s : Multiset (Tropical R)) :
untrop s.sum = Multiset.inf (s.map untrop) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction with s x IH
· simp
· simp only [sum_cons, ge_iff_le, untrop_add, untrop_le_iff, map_cons, inf_cons, ← IH]
rfl
#align multiset.untrop_sum Multiset.untrop_sum
theorem Finset.untrop_sum' [LinearOrder R] [OrderTop R] (s : Finset S) (f : S → Tropical R) :
untrop (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = s.inf (untrop ∘ f) := by
convert Multiset.untrop_sum (s.val.map f)
simp only [Multiset.map_map, Function.comp_apply]
rfl
#align finset.untrop_sum' Finset.untrop_sum'
theorem untrop_sum_eq_sInf_image [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder R] (s : Finset S)
(f : S → Tropical (WithTop R)) : untrop (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = sInf (untrop ∘ f '' s) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | h)
· simp only [Set.image_empty, coe_empty, sum_empty, WithTop.sInf_empty, untrop_zero]
· rw [← inf'_eq_csInf_image _ h, inf'_eq_inf, Finset.untrop_sum']
#align untrop_sum_eq_Inf_image untrop_sum_eq_sInf_image
theorem untrop_sum [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder R] [Fintype S] (f : S → Tropical (WithTop R)) :
untrop (∑ i : S, f i) = ⨅ i : S, untrop (f i) := by
rw [iInf,← Set.image_univ,← coe_univ, untrop_sum_eq_sInf_image]
rfl
#align untrop_sum untrop_sum
/-- Note we cannot use `i ∈ s` instead of `i : s` here
as it is simply not true on conditionally complete lattices! -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Tropical/BigOperators.lean | 141 | 143 | theorem Finset.untrop_sum [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder R] (s : Finset S)
(f : S → Tropical (WithTop R)) : untrop (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ⨅ i : s, untrop (f i) := by |
simpa [← _root_.untrop_sum] using (sum_attach _ _).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Inv
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
#align ennreal.to_real_add ENNReal.toReal_add
theorem toReal_sub_of_le {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : b ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
(a - b).toReal = a.toReal - b.toReal := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_le_ne_top ha h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_sub, ENNReal.coe_toReal, NNReal.coe_sub (ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mp h)]
#align ennreal.to_real_sub_of_le ENNReal.toReal_sub_of_le
theorem le_toReal_sub {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal - b.toReal ≤ (a - b).toReal := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
induction a
· simp
· simp only [← coe_sub, NNReal.sub_def, Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_toReal]
exact le_max_left _ _
#align ennreal.le_to_real_sub ENNReal.le_toReal_sub
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, top_toReal, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, top_toReal, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
#align ennreal.to_real_add_le ENNReal.toReal_add_le
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
#align ennreal.of_real_add ENNReal.ofReal_add
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
#align ennreal.of_real_add_le ENNReal.ofReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
#align ennreal.to_real_le_to_real ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
#align ennreal.to_real_mono ENNReal.toReal_mono
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
#align ennreal.to_real_lt_to_real ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
#align ennreal.to_real_strict_mono ENNReal.toReal_strict_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_mono ENNReal.toNNReal_mono
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
/-- If `a ≤ b + c` and `a = ∞` whenever `b = ∞` or `c = ∞`, then
`ENNReal.toReal a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b + ENNReal.toReal c`. This lemma is useful to transfer
triangle-like inequalities from `ENNReal`s to `Real`s. -/
theorem toReal_le_add' (hle : a ≤ b + c) (hb : b = ∞ → a = ∞) (hc : c = ∞ → a = ∞) :
a.toReal ≤ b.toReal + c.toReal := by
refine le_trans (toReal_mono' hle ?_) toReal_add_le
simpa only [add_eq_top, or_imp] using And.intro hb hc
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
/-- If `a ≤ b + c`, `b ≠ ∞`, and `c ≠ ∞`, then
`ENNReal.toReal a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b + ENNReal.toReal c`. This lemma is useful to transfer
triangle-like inequalities from `ENNReal`s to `Real`s. -/
theorem toReal_le_add (hle : a ≤ b + c) (hb : b ≠ ∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
a.toReal ≤ b.toReal + c.toReal :=
toReal_le_add' hle (flip absurd hb) (flip absurd hc)
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_le_to_nnreal ENNReal.toNNReal_le_toNNReal
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_strict_mono ENNReal.toNNReal_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_lt_to_nnreal ENNReal.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal hr hp).2 h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal hp hr).2 h, max_eq_left]
#align ennreal.to_real_max ENNReal.toReal_max
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal hr hp).2 h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal hp hr).2 h, min_eq_right]
#align ennreal.to_real_min ENNReal.toReal_min
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
#align ennreal.to_real_sup ENNReal.toReal_sup
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
#align ennreal.to_real_inf ENNReal.toReal_inf
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_pos_iff ENNReal.toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_pos ENNReal.toNNReal_pos
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
#align ennreal.to_real_pos_iff ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
#align ennreal.to_real_pos ENNReal.toReal_pos
@[gcongr]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
#align ennreal.of_real_le_of_real ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
theorem ofReal_le_of_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b :=
(ofReal_le_ofReal h).trans ofReal_toReal_le
#align ennreal.of_real_le_of_le_to_real ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_le_coe, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff h]
#align ennreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ .ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q ∨ p ≤ 0 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff'
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < .ofReal q ↔ p < q ∧ 0 < q :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p = ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p = q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff hp hq]
#align ennreal.of_real_eq_of_real_iff ENNReal.ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff h]
#align ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
#align ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 0 < p := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
#align ennreal.of_real_pos ENNReal.ofReal_pos
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 222 | 222 | theorem ofReal_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 := by | simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Cyclic
#align_import ring_theory.integral_domain from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6e70e0d419bf686784937d64ed4bfde866ff229e"
/-!
# Integral domains
Assorted theorems about integral domains.
## Main theorems
* `isCyclic_of_subgroup_isDomain`: A finite subgroup of the units of an integral domain is cyclic.
* `Fintype.fieldOfDomain`: A finite integral domain is a field.
## Notes
Wedderburn's little theorem, which shows that all finite division rings are actually fields,
is in `Mathlib.RingTheory.LittleWedderburn`.
## Tags
integral domain, finite integral domain, finite field
-/
section
open Finset Polynomial Function Nat
section CancelMonoidWithZero
-- There doesn't seem to be a better home for these right now
variable {M : Type*} [CancelMonoidWithZero M] [Finite M]
theorem mul_right_bijective_of_finite₀ {a : M} (ha : a ≠ 0) : Bijective fun b => a * b :=
Finite.injective_iff_bijective.1 <| mul_right_injective₀ ha
#align mul_right_bijective_of_finite₀ mul_right_bijective_of_finite₀
theorem mul_left_bijective_of_finite₀ {a : M} (ha : a ≠ 0) : Bijective fun b => b * a :=
Finite.injective_iff_bijective.1 <| mul_left_injective₀ ha
#align mul_left_bijective_of_finite₀ mul_left_bijective_of_finite₀
/-- Every finite nontrivial cancel_monoid_with_zero is a group_with_zero. -/
def Fintype.groupWithZeroOfCancel (M : Type*) [CancelMonoidWithZero M] [DecidableEq M] [Fintype M]
[Nontrivial M] : GroupWithZero M :=
{ ‹Nontrivial M›,
‹CancelMonoidWithZero M› with
inv := fun a => if h : a = 0 then 0 else Fintype.bijInv (mul_right_bijective_of_finite₀ h) 1
mul_inv_cancel := fun a ha => by
simp only [Inv.inv, dif_neg ha]
exact Fintype.rightInverse_bijInv _ _
inv_zero := by simp [Inv.inv, dif_pos rfl] }
#align fintype.group_with_zero_of_cancel Fintype.groupWithZeroOfCancel
theorem exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow_of_coprime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [IsDomain R]
[GCDMonoid R] [Unique Rˣ] {a b c : R} {n : ℕ} (cp : IsCoprime a b) (h : a * b = c ^ n) :
∃ d : R, a = d ^ n := by
refine exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow (isUnit_of_dvd_one ?_) h
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := cp
rw [← hxy]
exact -- Porting note: added `GCDMonoid.` twice
dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left _ _) _)
(dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right _ _) _)
#align exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow_of_coprime exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow_of_coprime
nonrec
theorem Finset.exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow_of_coprime {ι R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [IsDomain R]
[GCDMonoid R] [Unique Rˣ] {n : ℕ} {c : R} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, i ≠ j → IsCoprime (f i) (f j))
(hprod : ∏ i ∈ s, f i = c ^ n) : ∀ i ∈ s, ∃ d : R, f i = d ^ n := by
classical
intro i hi
rw [← insert_erase hi, prod_insert (not_mem_erase i s)] at hprod
refine
exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow_of_coprime
(IsCoprime.prod_right fun j hj => h i hi j (erase_subset i s hj) fun hij => ?_) hprod
rw [hij] at hj
exact (s.not_mem_erase _) hj
#align finset.exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow_of_coprime Finset.exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow_of_coprime
end CancelMonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} {G : Type*}
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [IsDomain R] [Fintype R]
/-- Every finite domain is a division ring. More generally, they are fields; this can be found in
`Mathlib.RingTheory.LittleWedderburn`. -/
def Fintype.divisionRingOfIsDomain (R : Type*) [Ring R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] :
DivisionRing R where
__ := Fintype.groupWithZeroOfCancel R
__ := ‹Ring R›
nnqsmul := _
qsmul := _
#align fintype.division_ring_of_is_domain Fintype.divisionRingOfIsDomain
/-- Every finite commutative domain is a field. More generally, commutativity is not required: this
can be found in `Mathlib.RingTheory.LittleWedderburn`. -/
def Fintype.fieldOfDomain (R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] : Field R :=
{ Fintype.divisionRingOfIsDomain R, ‹CommRing R› with }
#align fintype.field_of_domain Fintype.fieldOfDomain
theorem Finite.isField_of_domain (R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [Finite R] : IsField R := by
cases nonempty_fintype R
exact @Field.toIsField R (@Fintype.fieldOfDomain R _ _ (Classical.decEq R) _)
#align finite.is_field_of_domain Finite.isField_of_domain
end Ring
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [Group G]
-- Porting note: Finset doesn't seem to have `{g ∈ univ | g^n = g₀}` notation anymore,
-- so we have to use `Finset.filter` instead
theorem card_nthRoots_subgroup_units [Fintype G] [DecidableEq G] (f : G →* R) (hf : Injective f)
{n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (g₀ : G) :
Finset.card (Finset.univ.filter (fun g ↦ g^n = g₀)) ≤ Multiset.card (nthRoots n (f g₀)) := by
haveI : DecidableEq R := Classical.decEq _
refine le_trans ?_ (nthRoots n (f g₀)).toFinset_card_le
apply card_le_card_of_inj_on f
· intro g hg
rw [mem_filter] at hg
rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_nthRoots hn, ← f.map_pow, hg.2]
· intros
apply hf
assumption
#align card_nth_roots_subgroup_units card_nthRoots_subgroup_units
/-- A finite subgroup of the unit group of an integral domain is cyclic. -/
theorem isCyclic_of_subgroup_isDomain [Finite G] (f : G →* R) (hf : Injective f) : IsCyclic G := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype G
apply isCyclic_of_card_pow_eq_one_le
intro n hn
exact le_trans (card_nthRoots_subgroup_units f hf hn 1) (card_nthRoots n (f 1))
#align is_cyclic_of_subgroup_is_domain isCyclic_of_subgroup_isDomain
/-- The unit group of a finite integral domain is cyclic.
To support `ℤˣ` and other infinite monoids with finite groups of units, this requires only
`Finite Rˣ` rather than deducing it from `Finite R`. -/
instance [Finite Rˣ] : IsCyclic Rˣ :=
isCyclic_of_subgroup_isDomain (Units.coeHom R) <| Units.ext
section
variable (S : Subgroup Rˣ) [Finite S]
/-- A finite subgroup of the units of an integral domain is cyclic. -/
instance subgroup_units_cyclic : IsCyclic S := by
-- Porting note: the original proof used a `coe`, but I was not able to get it to work.
apply isCyclic_of_subgroup_isDomain (R := R) (G := S) _ _
· exact MonoidHom.mk (OneHom.mk (fun s => ↑s.val) rfl) (by simp)
· exact Units.ext.comp Subtype.val_injective
#align subgroup_units_cyclic subgroup_units_cyclic
end
section EuclideanDivision
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable (K : Type) [Field K] [Algebra R[X] K] [IsFractionRing R[X] K]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/IntegralDomain.lean | 174 | 185 | theorem div_eq_quo_add_rem_div (f : R[X]) {g : R[X]} (hg : g.Monic) :
∃ q r : R[X], r.degree < g.degree ∧
(algebraMap R[X] K f) / (algebraMap R[X] K g) =
algebraMap R[X] K q + (algebraMap R[X] K r) / (algebraMap R[X] K g) := by |
refine ⟨f /ₘ g, f %ₘ g, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact degree_modByMonic_lt _ hg
· have hg' : algebraMap R[X] K g ≠ 0 :=
-- Porting note: the proof was `by exact_mod_cast Monic.ne_zero hg`
(map_ne_zero_iff _ (IsFractionRing.injective R[X] K)).mpr (Monic.ne_zero hg)
field_simp [hg']
-- Porting note: `norm_cast` was here, but does nothing.
rw [add_comm, mul_comm, ← map_mul, ← map_add, modByMonic_add_div f hg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
#align_import topology.algebra.filter_basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Group and ring filter bases
A `GroupFilterBasis` is a `FilterBasis` on a group with some properties relating
the basis to the group structure. The main theorem is that a `GroupFilterBasis`
on a group gives a topology on the group which makes it into a topological group
with neighborhoods of the neutral element generated by the given basis.
## Main definitions and results
Given a group `G` and a ring `R`:
* `GroupFilterBasis G`: the type of filter bases that will become neighborhood of `1`
for a topology on `G` compatible with the group structure
* `GroupFilterBasis.topology`: the associated topology
* `GroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalGroup`: the compatibility between the above topology
and the group structure
* `RingFilterBasis R`: the type of filter bases that will become neighborhood of `0`
for a topology on `R` compatible with the ring structure
* `RingFilterBasis.topology`: the associated topology
* `RingFilterBasis.isTopologicalRing`: the compatibility between the above topology
and the ring structure
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
-/
open Filter Set TopologicalSpace Function
open Topology Filter Pointwise
universe u
/-- A `GroupFilterBasis` on a group is a `FilterBasis` satisfying some additional axioms.
Example : if `G` is a topological group then the neighbourhoods of the identity are a
`GroupFilterBasis`. Conversely given a `GroupFilterBasis` one can define a topology
compatible with the group structure on `G`. -/
class GroupFilterBasis (G : Type u) [Group G] extends FilterBasis G where
one' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → (1 : G) ∈ U
mul' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V * V ⊆ U
inv' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (fun x ↦ x⁻¹) ⁻¹' U
conj' : ∀ x₀, ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (fun x ↦ x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) ⁻¹' U
#align group_filter_basis GroupFilterBasis
/-- An `AddGroupFilterBasis` on an additive group is a `FilterBasis` satisfying some additional
axioms. Example : if `G` is a topological group then the neighbourhoods of the identity are an
`AddGroupFilterBasis`. Conversely given an `AddGroupFilterBasis` one can define a topology
compatible with the group structure on `G`. -/
class AddGroupFilterBasis (A : Type u) [AddGroup A] extends FilterBasis A where
zero' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → (0 : A) ∈ U
add' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V + V ⊆ U
neg' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (fun x ↦ -x) ⁻¹' U
conj' : ∀ x₀, ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (fun x ↦ x₀ + x + -x₀) ⁻¹' U
#align add_group_filter_basis AddGroupFilterBasis
attribute [to_additive existing] GroupFilterBasis GroupFilterBasis.conj'
GroupFilterBasis.toFilterBasis
/-- `GroupFilterBasis` constructor in the commutative group case. -/
@[to_additive "`AddGroupFilterBasis` constructor in the additive commutative group case."]
def groupFilterBasisOfComm {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (sets : Set (Set G))
(nonempty : sets.Nonempty) (inter_sets : ∀ x y, x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → ∃ z ∈ sets, z ⊆ x ∩ y)
(one : ∀ U ∈ sets, (1 : G) ∈ U) (mul : ∀ U ∈ sets, ∃ V ∈ sets, V * V ⊆ U)
(inv : ∀ U ∈ sets, ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (fun x ↦ x⁻¹) ⁻¹' U) : GroupFilterBasis G :=
{ sets := sets
nonempty := nonempty
inter_sets := inter_sets _ _
one' := one _
mul' := mul _
inv' := inv _
conj' := fun x U U_in ↦ ⟨U, U_in, by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm, preimage_id']; rfl⟩ }
#align group_filter_basis_of_comm groupFilterBasisOfComm
#align add_group_filter_basis_of_comm addGroupFilterBasisOfComm
namespace GroupFilterBasis
variable {G : Type u} [Group G] {B : GroupFilterBasis G}
@[to_additive]
instance : Membership (Set G) (GroupFilterBasis G) :=
⟨fun s f ↦ s ∈ f.sets⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem one {U : Set G} : U ∈ B → (1 : G) ∈ U :=
GroupFilterBasis.one'
#align group_filter_basis.one GroupFilterBasis.one
#align add_group_filter_basis.zero AddGroupFilterBasis.zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul {U : Set G} : U ∈ B → ∃ V ∈ B, V * V ⊆ U :=
GroupFilterBasis.mul'
#align group_filter_basis.mul GroupFilterBasis.mul
#align add_group_filter_basis.add AddGroupFilterBasis.add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv {U : Set G} : U ∈ B → ∃ V ∈ B, V ⊆ (fun x ↦ x⁻¹) ⁻¹' U :=
GroupFilterBasis.inv'
#align group_filter_basis.inv GroupFilterBasis.inv
#align add_group_filter_basis.neg AddGroupFilterBasis.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem conj : ∀ x₀, ∀ {U}, U ∈ B → ∃ V ∈ B, V ⊆ (fun x ↦ x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) ⁻¹' U :=
GroupFilterBasis.conj'
#align group_filter_basis.conj GroupFilterBasis.conj
#align add_group_filter_basis.conj AddGroupFilterBasis.conj
/-- The trivial group filter basis consists of `{1}` only. The associated topology
is discrete. -/
@[to_additive "The trivial additive group filter basis consists of `{0}` only. The associated
topology is discrete."]
instance : Inhabited (GroupFilterBasis G) where
default := {
sets := {{1}}
nonempty := singleton_nonempty _
inter_sets := by simp
one' := by simp
mul' := by simp
inv' := by simp
conj' := by simp }
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_mul_self (B : GroupFilterBasis G) {U : Set G} (h : U ∈ B) : U ⊆ U * U :=
fun x x_in ↦ ⟨1, one h, x, x_in, one_mul x⟩
#align group_filter_basis.prod_subset_self GroupFilterBasis.subset_mul_self
#align add_group_filter_basis.sum_subset_self AddGroupFilterBasis.subset_add_self
/-- The neighborhood function of a `GroupFilterBasis`. -/
@[to_additive "The neighborhood function of an `AddGroupFilterBasis`."]
def N (B : GroupFilterBasis G) : G → Filter G :=
fun x ↦ map (fun y ↦ x * y) B.toFilterBasis.filter
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align group_filter_basis.N GroupFilterBasis.N
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align add_group_filter_basis.N AddGroupFilterBasis.N
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem N_one (B : GroupFilterBasis G) : B.N 1 = B.toFilterBasis.filter := by
simp only [N, one_mul, map_id']
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align group_filter_basis.N_one GroupFilterBasis.N_one
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align add_group_filter_basis.N_zero AddGroupFilterBasis.N_zero
@[to_additive]
protected theorem hasBasis (B : GroupFilterBasis G) (x : G) :
HasBasis (B.N x) (fun V : Set G ↦ V ∈ B) fun V ↦ (fun y ↦ x * y) '' V :=
HasBasis.map (fun y ↦ x * y) toFilterBasis.hasBasis
#align group_filter_basis.has_basis GroupFilterBasis.hasBasis
#align add_group_filter_basis.has_basis AddGroupFilterBasis.hasBasis
/-- The topological space structure coming from a group filter basis. -/
@[to_additive "The topological space structure coming from an additive group filter basis."]
def topology (B : GroupFilterBasis G) : TopologicalSpace G :=
TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds B.N
#align group_filter_basis.topology GroupFilterBasis.topology
#align add_group_filter_basis.topology AddGroupFilterBasis.topology
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_eq (B : GroupFilterBasis G) {x₀ : G} : @nhds G B.topology x₀ = B.N x₀ := by
apply TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun x ↦ (FilterBasis.hasBasis _).map _)
· intro a U U_in
exact ⟨1, B.one U_in, mul_one a⟩
· intro a U U_in
rcases GroupFilterBasis.mul U_in with ⟨V, V_in, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [image_mem_map (B.mem_filter_of_mem V_in)]
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
calc
a • U ⊇ a • (V * V) := smul_set_mono hVU
_ ⊇ a • x • V := smul_set_mono <| smul_set_subset_smul hx
_ = (a * x) • V := smul_smul ..
_ ∈ (a * x) • B.filter := smul_set_mem_smul_filter <| B.mem_filter_of_mem V_in
#align group_filter_basis.nhds_eq GroupFilterBasis.nhds_eq
#align add_group_filter_basis.nhds_eq AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_eq (B : GroupFilterBasis G) :
@nhds G B.topology (1 : G) = B.toFilterBasis.filter := by
rw [B.nhds_eq]
simp only [N, one_mul]
exact map_id
#align group_filter_basis.nhds_one_eq GroupFilterBasis.nhds_one_eq
#align add_group_filter_basis.nhds_zero_eq AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_hasBasis (B : GroupFilterBasis G) (x₀ : G) :
HasBasis (@nhds G B.topology x₀) (fun V : Set G ↦ V ∈ B) fun V ↦ (fun y ↦ x₀ * y) '' V := by
rw [B.nhds_eq]
apply B.hasBasis
#align group_filter_basis.nhds_has_basis GroupFilterBasis.nhds_hasBasis
#align add_group_filter_basis.nhds_has_basis AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_hasBasis
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/FilterBasis.lean | 205 | 208 | theorem nhds_one_hasBasis (B : GroupFilterBasis G) :
HasBasis (@nhds G B.topology 1) (fun V : Set G ↦ V ∈ B) id := by |
rw [B.nhds_one_eq]
exact B.toFilterBasis.hasBasis
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Compact
/-!
# Locally compact spaces
We define the following classes of topological spaces:
* `WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace`: every point `x` has a compact neighborhood.
* `LocallyCompactSpace`: for every point `x`, every open neighborhood of `x` contains a compact
neighborhood of `x`. The definition is formulated in terms of the neighborhood filter.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Classical
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
instance [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X] [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace Y] :
WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace (X × Y) where
exists_compact_mem_nhds x :=
let ⟨s₁, hc₁, h₁⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x.1
let ⟨s₂, hc₂, h₂⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x.2
⟨s₁ ×ˢ s₂, hc₁.prod hc₂, prod_mem_nhds h₁ h₂⟩
instance {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {X : ι → Type*} [(i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[(i : ι) → WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace (X i)] :
WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace ((i : ι) → X i) where
exists_compact_mem_nhds := fun f ↦ by
choose s hsc hs using fun i ↦ exists_compact_mem_nhds (f i)
exact ⟨pi univ s, isCompact_univ_pi hsc, set_pi_mem_nhds univ.toFinite fun i _ ↦ hs i⟩
instance (priority := 100) [CompactSpace X] : WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X where
exists_compact_mem_nhds _ := ⟨univ, isCompact_univ, univ_mem⟩
/-- In a weakly locally compact space,
every compact set is contained in the interior of a compact set. -/
theorem exists_compact_superset [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X] {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
∃ K', IsCompact K' ∧ K ⊆ interior K' := by
choose s hc hmem using fun x : X ↦ exists_compact_mem_nhds x
rcases hK.elim_nhds_subcover _ fun x _ ↦ interior_mem_nhds.2 (hmem x) with ⟨I, -, hIK⟩
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ I, s x, I.isCompact_biUnion fun _ _ ↦ hc _, hIK.trans ?_⟩
exact iUnion₂_subset fun x hx ↦ interior_mono <| subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun x _ ↦ s x) x hx
#align exists_compact_superset exists_compact_superset
/-- In a weakly locally compact space,
the filters `𝓝 x` and `cocompact X` are disjoint for all `X`. -/
theorem disjoint_nhds_cocompact [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X] (x : X) :
Disjoint (𝓝 x) (cocompact X) :=
let ⟨_, hc, hx⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_right hx hc.compl_mem_cocompact
theorem compact_basis_nhds [LocallyCompactSpace X] (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ IsCompact s) fun s => s :=
hasBasis_self.2 <| by simpa only [and_comm] using LocallyCompactSpace.local_compact_nhds x
#align compact_basis_nhds compact_basis_nhds
theorem local_compact_nhds [LocallyCompactSpace X] {x : X} {n : Set X} (h : n ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, s ⊆ n ∧ IsCompact s :=
LocallyCompactSpace.local_compact_nhds _ _ h
#align local_compact_nhds local_compact_nhds
theorem LocallyCompactSpace.of_hasBasis {ι : X → Type*} {p : ∀ x, ι x → Prop}
{s : ∀ x, ι x → Set X} (h : ∀ x, (𝓝 x).HasBasis (p x) (s x))
(hc : ∀ x i, p x i → IsCompact (s x i)) : LocallyCompactSpace X :=
⟨fun x _t ht =>
let ⟨i, hp, ht⟩ := (h x).mem_iff.1 ht
⟨s x i, (h x).mem_of_mem hp, ht, hc x i hp⟩⟩
#align locally_compact_space_of_has_basis LocallyCompactSpace.of_hasBasis
@[deprecated (since := "2023-12-29")]
alias locallyCompactSpace_of_hasBasis := LocallyCompactSpace.of_hasBasis
instance Prod.locallyCompactSpace (X : Type*) (Y : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] [LocallyCompactSpace X] [LocallyCompactSpace Y] :
LocallyCompactSpace (X × Y) :=
have := fun x : X × Y => (compact_basis_nhds x.1).prod_nhds' (compact_basis_nhds x.2)
.of_hasBasis this fun _ _ ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, _, h₂⟩ => h₁.prod h₂
#align prod.locally_compact_space Prod.locallyCompactSpace
section Pi
variable {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, LocallyCompactSpace (X i)]
/-- In general it suffices that all but finitely many of the spaces are compact,
but that's not straightforward to state and use. -/
instance Pi.locallyCompactSpace_of_finite [Finite ι] : LocallyCompactSpace (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun t n hn => by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi] at hn
obtain ⟨s, -, n', hn', hsub⟩ := hn
choose n'' hn'' hsub' hc using fun i =>
LocallyCompactSpace.local_compact_nhds (t i) (n' i) (hn' i)
refine ⟨(Set.univ : Set ι).pi n'', ?_, subset_trans (fun _ h => ?_) hsub, isCompact_univ_pi hc⟩
· exact (set_pi_mem_nhds_iff (@Set.finite_univ ι _) _).mpr fun i _ => hn'' i
· exact fun i _ => hsub' i (h i trivial)⟩
#align pi.locally_compact_space_of_finite Pi.locallyCompactSpace_of_finite
/-- For spaces that are not Hausdorff. -/
instance Pi.locallyCompactSpace [∀ i, CompactSpace (X i)] : LocallyCompactSpace (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun t n hn => by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi] at hn
obtain ⟨s, hs, n', hn', hsub⟩ := hn
choose n'' hn'' hsub' hc using fun i =>
LocallyCompactSpace.local_compact_nhds (t i) (n' i) (hn' i)
refine ⟨s.pi n'', ?_, subset_trans (fun _ => ?_) hsub, ?_⟩
· exact (set_pi_mem_nhds_iff hs _).mpr fun i _ => hn'' i
· exact forall₂_imp fun i _ hi' => hsub' i hi'
· rw [← Set.univ_pi_ite]
refine isCompact_univ_pi fun i => ?_
by_cases h : i ∈ s
· rw [if_pos h]
exact hc i
· rw [if_neg h]
exact CompactSpace.isCompact_univ⟩
#align pi.locally_compact_space Pi.locallyCompactSpace
instance Function.locallyCompactSpace_of_finite [Finite ι] [LocallyCompactSpace Y] :
LocallyCompactSpace (ι → Y) :=
Pi.locallyCompactSpace_of_finite
#align function.locally_compact_space_of_finite Function.locallyCompactSpace_of_finite
instance Function.locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace Y] [CompactSpace Y] :
LocallyCompactSpace (ι → Y) :=
Pi.locallyCompactSpace
#align function.locally_compact_space Function.locallyCompactSpace
end Pi
instance (priority := 900) [LocallyCompactSpace X] : LocallyCompactPair X Y where
exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo hf hs :=
let ⟨K, hKx, hKs, hKc⟩ := local_compact_nhds (hf.continuousAt hs); ⟨K, hKx, hKc, hKs⟩
instance (priority := 100) [LocallyCompactSpace X] : WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X where
exists_compact_mem_nhds (x : X) :=
let ⟨K, hx, _, hKc⟩ := local_compact_nhds (x := x) univ_mem; ⟨K, hKc, hx⟩
/-- A reformulation of the definition of locally compact space: In a locally compact space,
every open set containing `x` has a compact subset containing `x` in its interior. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/LocallyCompact.lean | 141 | 144 | theorem exists_compact_subset [LocallyCompactSpace X] {x : X} {U : Set X} (hU : IsOpen U)
(hx : x ∈ U) : ∃ K : Set X, IsCompact K ∧ x ∈ interior K ∧ K ⊆ U := by |
rcases LocallyCompactSpace.local_compact_nhds x U (hU.mem_nhds hx) with ⟨K, h1K, h2K, h3K⟩
exact ⟨K, h3K, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 h1K, h2K⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
#align real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
#align real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow Real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
#align real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul Real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
#align real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
#align real.rpow_add Real.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
#align real.rpow_add' Real.rpow_add'
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
#align real.rpow_add_of_nonneg Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
#align real.le_rpow_add Real.le_rpow_add
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
#align real.rpow_sum_of_pos Real.rpow_sum_of_pos
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
#align real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg Real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg Real.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub Real.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub' Real.rpow_sub'
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
#align complex.of_real_cpow Complex.ofReal_cpow
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, abs.map_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg,
arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx), ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
#align complex.of_real_cpow_of_nonpos Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(abs x ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [abs.pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = (abs x) ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = (abs x) ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 306 | 309 | theorem abs_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by |
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, abs_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (abs.pos hz)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monomial
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.WithBot
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.definitions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"808ea4ebfabeb599f21ec4ae87d6dc969597887f"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The definitions include
`degree`, `Monic`, `leadingCoeff`
Results include
- `degree_mul` : The degree of the product is the sum of degrees
- `leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq` and `leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt` :
The leading_coefficient of a sum is determined by the leading coefficients and degrees
-/
-- Porting note: `Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop` should be imported for `Nat.cast_withBot`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
#align polynomial.degree Polynomial.degree
theorem supDegree_eq_degree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree WithBot.some = p.degree :=
max_eq_sup_coe
theorem degree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => degree p < degree q :=
InvImage.wf degree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.degree_lt_wf Polynomial.degree_lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation R[X] :=
⟨_, degree_lt_wf⟩
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbot' 0
#align polynomial.nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`-/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
#align polynomial.leading_coeff Polynomial.leadingCoeff
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.monic Polynomial.Monic
@[nontriviality]
theorem monic_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : R[X]) : Monic p :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton Polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.monic.def Polynomial.Monic.def
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
#align polynomial.monic.decidable Polynomial.Monic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.leading_coeff Polynomial.Monic.leadingCoeff
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.Monic.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_zero Polynomial.degree_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_degree_zero Polynomial.natDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align polynomial.degree_eq_bot Polynomial.degree_eq_bot
@[nontriviality]
theorem degree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, degree_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem natDegree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : natDegree p = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, natDegree_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.natDegree_of_subsingleton
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
#align polynomial.degree_eq_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree
theorem supDegree_eq_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree id = p.natDegree := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp
apply WithBot.coe_injective
rw [← AddMonoidAlgebra.supDegree_withBot_some_comp, Function.comp_id, supDegree_eq_degree,
degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_withBot]
rwa [support_toFinsupp, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, support_eq_empty]
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_withBot` is required.
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbot'_coe]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
#align polynomial.degree_ne_of_nat_degree_ne Polynomial.degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.le_u_l _
#align polynomial.degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 171 | 172 | theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by | unfold natDegree; rw [h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Doubling
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
#align_import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue.eq_haar from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Relationship between the Haar and Lebesgue measures
We prove that the Haar measure and Lebesgue measure are equal on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`, in
`MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume` and `MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi`.
We deduce basic properties of any Haar measure on a finite dimensional real vector space:
* `map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar`: a linear map rescales the Haar measure by the
absolute value of its determinant.
* `addHaar_preimage_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map with nonzero determinant, the measure
of `f ⁻¹' s` is the measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the inverse of the
determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_image_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map, the measure of `f '' s` is the
measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_submodule` : a strict submodule has measure `0`.
* `addHaar_smul` : the measure of `r • s` is `|r| ^ dim * μ s`.
* `addHaar_ball`: the measure of `ball x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_closedBall`: the measure of `closedBall x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_sphere`: spheres have zero measure.
This makes it possible to associate a Lebesgue measure to an `n`-alternating map in dimension `n`.
This measure is called `AlternatingMap.measure`. Its main property is
`ω.measure_parallelepiped v`, stating that the associated measure of the parallelepiped spanned
by vectors `v₁, ..., vₙ` is given by `|ω v|`.
We also show that a Lebesgue density point `x` of a set `s` (with respect to closed balls) has
density one for the rescaled copies `{x} + r • t` of a given set `t` with positive measure, in
`tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_one_of_density_one`. In particular, `s` intersects `{x} + r • t` for
small `r`, see `eventually_nonempty_inter_smul_of_density_one`.
Statements on integrals of functions with respect to an additive Haar measure can be found in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace`.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise Topology NNReal
/-- The interval `[0,1]` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01 : PositiveCompacts ℝ where
carrier := Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by simp_rw [interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo, zero_lt_one]
#align topological_space.positive_compacts.Icc01 TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01
universe u
/-- The set `[0,1]^ι` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] :
PositiveCompacts (ι → ℝ) where
carrier := pi univ fun _ => Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_univ_pi fun _ => isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by
simp only [interior_pi_set, Set.toFinite, interior_Icc, univ_pi_nonempty_iff, nonempty_Ioo,
imp_true_iff, zero_lt_one]
#align topological_space.positive_compacts.pi_Icc01 TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01
/-- The parallelepiped formed from the standard basis for `ι → ℝ` is `[0,1]^ι` -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
(Pi.basisFun ℝ ι).parallelepiped = TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
refine Eq.trans ?_ ((uIcc_of_le ?_).trans (Set.pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm)
· classical convert parallelepiped_single (ι := ι) 1
· exact zero_le_one
#align basis.parallelepiped_basis_fun Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun
/-- A parallelepiped can be expressed on the standard basis. -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_eq_map {ι E : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
b.parallelepiped = (PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι).map b.equivFun.symm
b.equivFunL.symm.continuous b.equivFunL.symm.isOpenMap := by
classical
rw [← Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun, ← Basis.parallelepiped_map]
congr with x
simp
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
theorem Basis.map_addHaar {ι E F : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [MeasurableSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace E]
[BorelSpace F] [SecondCountableTopology F] [SigmaCompactSpace F]
(b : Basis ι ℝ E) (f : E ≃L[ℝ] F) :
map f b.addHaar = (b.map f.toLinearEquiv).addHaar := by
have : IsAddHaarMeasure (map f b.addHaar) :=
AddEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map b.addHaar f.toAddEquiv f.continuous f.symm.continuous
rw [eq_comm, Basis.addHaar_eq_iff, Measure.map_apply f.continuous.measurable
(PositiveCompacts.isCompact _).measurableSet, Basis.coe_parallelepiped, Basis.coe_map]
erw [← image_parallelepiped, f.toEquiv.preimage_image, addHaar_self]
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts FiniteDimensional
/-!
### The Lebesgue measure is a Haar measure on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`.
-/
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume : addHaarMeasure Icc01 = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume Icc01).symm; simp [Icc01]
#align measure_theory.add_haar_measure_eq_volume MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ^ι`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
addHaarMeasure (piIcc01 ι) = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume (piIcc01 ι)).symm
simp only [piIcc01, volume_pi_pi fun _ => Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, PositiveCompacts.coe_mk,
Compacts.coe_mk, Finset.prod_const_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, Real.volume_Icc, one_smul, sub_zero]
#align measure_theory.add_haar_measure_eq_volume_pi MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: remove this instance?
instance isAddHaarMeasure_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)) :=
inferInstance
#align measure_theory.is_add_haar_measure_volume_pi MeasureTheory.isAddHaarMeasure_volume_pi
namespace Measure
/-!
### Strict subspaces have zero measure
-/
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. This auxiliary lemma proves this assuming additionally that the set is bounded. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (sb : IsBounded s) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl ∞
calc
∞ = ∑' _ : ℕ, μ s := (ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero h).symm
_ = ∑' n : ℕ, μ ({u n} + s) := by
congr 1; ext1 n; simp only [image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, singleton_add]
_ = μ (⋃ n, {u n} + s) := Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion hs fun n => by
simpa only [image_add_left, singleton_add] using measurable_id.const_add _ h's
_ = μ (range u + s) := by rw [← iUnion_add, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
_ < ∞ := (hu.add sb).measure_lt_top
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
suffices H : ∀ R, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 R) = 0 by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' n : ℕ, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 n) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat s 0]
exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
intro R
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux μ u
(isBounded_closedBall.subset inter_subset_right) hu _ (h's.inter measurableSet_closedBall)
refine pairwise_disjoint_mono hs fun n => ?_
exact add_subset_add Subset.rfl inter_subset_left
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates
/-- A strict vector subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_submodule {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (s : Submodule ℝ E)
(hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ∉ s := by
simpa only [Submodule.eq_top_iff', not_exists, Ne, not_forall] using hs
obtain ⟨c, cpos, cone⟩ : ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ c < 1 := ⟨1 / 2, by norm_num, by norm_num⟩
have A : IsBounded (range fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) :=
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) atTop (𝓝 ((0 : ℝ) • x)) :=
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one cpos.le cone).smul_const x
isBounded_range_of_tendsto _ this
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates μ _ A _
(Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional s).measurableSet
intro m n hmn
simp only [Function.onFun, image_add_left, singleton_add, disjoint_left, mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
intro y hym hyn
have A : (c ^ n - c ^ m) • x ∈ s := by
convert s.sub_mem hym hyn using 1
simp only [sub_smul, neg_sub_neg, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
have H : c ^ n - c ^ m ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, Ne] using (pow_right_strictAnti cpos cone).injective.ne hmn.symm
have : x ∈ s := by
convert s.smul_mem (c ^ n - c ^ m)⁻¹ A
rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel H, one_smul]
exact hx this
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_submodule MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_submodule
/-- A strict affine subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_affineSubspace {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(s : AffineSubspace ℝ E) (hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
rcases s.eq_bot_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· rw [AffineSubspace.bot_coe, measure_empty]
rw [Ne, ← AffineSubspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty hne] at hs
rcases hne with ⟨x, hx : x ∈ s⟩
simpa only [AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hx, vsub_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
image_add_right, neg_neg, measure_preimage_add_right] using addHaar_submodule μ s.direction hs
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_affine_subspace MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_affineSubspace
/-!
### Applying a linear map rescales Haar measure by the determinant
We first prove this on `ι → ℝ`, using that this is already known for the product Lebesgue
measure (thanks to matrices computations). Then, we extend this to any finite-dimensional real
vector space by using a linear equiv with a space of the form `ι → ℝ`, and arguing that such a
linear equiv maps Haar measure to Haar measure.
-/
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {f : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ}
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det f)⁻¹) • μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
/- We have already proved the result for the Lebesgue product measure, using matrices.
We deduce it for any Haar measure by uniqueness (up to scalar multiplication). -/
have := addHaarMeasure_unique μ (piIcc01 ι)
rw [this, addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi, Measure.map_smul,
Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi hf, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_linear_map_add_haar_pi_eq_smul_add_haar MeasureTheory.Measure.map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| • μ := by
-- we reduce to the case of `E = ι → ℝ`, for which we have already proved the result using
-- matrices in `map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar`.
let ι := Fin (finrank ℝ E)
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by infer_instance
have : finrank ℝ E = finrank ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by simp [ι]
have e : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ := LinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq E (ι → ℝ) this
-- next line is to avoid `g` getting reduced by `simp`.
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g = (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).comp (f.comp (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E)) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
have gdet : LinearMap.det g = LinearMap.det f := by rw [hg]; exact LinearMap.det_conj f e
rw [← gdet] at hf ⊢
have fg : f = (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).comp (g.comp (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ)) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply, hg]
simp only [fg, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp]
have Ce : Continuous e := (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
have Cg : Continuous g := LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional g
have Cesymm : Continuous e.symm := (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
rw [← map_map Cesymm.measurable (Cg.comp Ce).measurable, ← map_map Cg.measurable Ce.measurable]
haveI : IsAddHaarMeasure (map e μ) := (e : E ≃+ (ι → ℝ)).isAddHaarMeasure_map μ Ce Cesymm
have ecomp : e.symm ∘ e = id := by
ext x; simp only [id, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar hf (map e μ), Measure.map_smul,
map_map Cesymm.measurable Ce.measurable, ecomp, Measure.map_id]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_linear_map_add_haar_eq_smul_add_haar MeasureTheory.Measure.map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearMap {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map f μ s :=
((f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv.toHomeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply
s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s := by
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]; rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_preimage_linear_map MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_preimage_linearMap
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearMap {f : E →L[ℝ] E}
(hf : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E))⁻¹) * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ hf s
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_preimage_continuous_linear_map MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearMap
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s := by
have A : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0 := (LinearEquiv.isUnit_det' f).ne_zero
convert addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ A s
simp only [LinearEquiv.det_coe_symm]
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_preimage_linear_equiv MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv μ _ s
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_preimage_continuous_linear_equiv MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv
/-- The image of a set `s` under a linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det f| * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq (LinearMap.det f) 0 with (hf | hf)
· let g := (f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
change μ (g '' s) = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.image_eq_preimage g s, addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv]
congr
· simp only [hf, zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero]
have : μ (LinearMap.range f) = 0 :=
addHaar_submodule μ _ (LinearMap.range_lt_top_of_det_eq_zero hf).ne
exact le_antisymm (le_trans (measure_mono (image_subset_range _ _)) this.le) (zero_le _)
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_image_linear_map MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_image_linearMap
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearMap (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_image_linearMap μ _ s
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_image_continuous_linear_map MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_image_continuousLinearMap
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
μ.addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) s
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_image_continuous_linear_equiv MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_image_continuousLinearEquiv
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean | 342 | 346 | theorem LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ := by |
refine ⟨f.continuous_of_finiteDimensional.measurable, ?_⟩
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
#align_import category_theory.pi.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
/-!
# Categories of indexed families of objects.
We define the pointwise category structure on indexed families of objects in a category
(and also the dependent generalization).
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w₀ w₁ w₂ v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
variable {I : Type w₀} {J : Type w₁} (C : I → Type u₁) [∀ i, Category.{v₁} (C i)]
/-- `pi C` gives the cartesian product of an indexed family of categories.
-/
instance pi : Category.{max w₀ v₁} (∀ i, C i) where
Hom X Y := ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i
id X i := 𝟙 (X i)
comp f g i := f i ≫ g i
#align category_theory.pi CategoryTheory.pi
/-- This provides some assistance to typeclass search in a common situation,
which otherwise fails. (Without this `CategoryTheory.Pi.has_limit_of_has_limit_comp_eval` fails.)
-/
abbrev pi' {I : Type v₁} (C : I → Type u₁) [∀ i, Category.{v₁} (C i)] : Category.{v₁} (∀ i, C i) :=
CategoryTheory.pi C
#align category_theory.pi' CategoryTheory.pi'
attribute [instance] pi'
namespace Pi
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (X : ∀ i, C i) (i) : (𝟙 X : ∀ i, X i ⟶ X i) i = 𝟙 (X i) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.id_apply CategoryTheory.Pi.id_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply {X Y Z : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (i) :
(f ≫ g : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Z i) i = f i ≫ g i :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.comp_apply CategoryTheory.Pi.comp_apply
-- Porting note: need to add an additional `ext` lemma.
@[ext]
lemma ext {X Y : ∀ i, C i} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
funext (w ·)
/--
The evaluation functor at `i : I`, sending an `I`-indexed family of objects to the object over `i`.
-/
@[simps]
def eval (i : I) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ C i where
obj f := f i
map α := α i
#align category_theory.pi.eval CategoryTheory.Pi.eval
section
variable {J : Type w₁}
/- Porting note: add this because Lean cannot see directly through the `∘` for
`Function.comp` -/
instance (f : J → I) : (j : J) → Category ((C ∘ f) j) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
/-- Pull back an `I`-indexed family of objects to a `J`-indexed family, along a function `J → I`.
-/
@[simps]
def comap (h : J → I) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ (∀ j, C (h j)) where
obj f i := f (h i)
map α i := α (h i)
#align category_theory.pi.comap CategoryTheory.Pi.comap
variable (I)
/-- The natural isomorphism between
pulling back a grading along the identity function,
and the identity functor. -/
@[simps]
def comapId : comap C (id : I → I) ≅ 𝟭 (∀ i, C i) where
hom := { app := fun X => 𝟙 X }
inv := { app := fun X => 𝟙 X }
#align category_theory.pi.comap_id CategoryTheory.Pi.comapId
example (g : J → I) : (j : J) → Category (C (g j)) := by infer_instance
variable {I}
variable {K : Type w₂}
/-- The natural isomorphism comparing between
pulling back along two successive functions, and
pulling back along their composition
-/
@[simps!]
def comapComp (f : K → J) (g : J → I) : comap C g ⋙ comap (C ∘ g) f ≅ comap C (g ∘ f) where
hom :=
{ app := fun X b => 𝟙 (X (g (f b)))
naturality := fun X Y f' => by simp only [comap, Function.comp]; funext; simp }
inv :=
{ app := fun X b => 𝟙 (X (g (f b)))
naturality := fun X Y f' => by simp only [comap, Function.comp]; funext; simp }
#align category_theory.pi.comap_comp CategoryTheory.Pi.comapComp
/-- The natural isomorphism between pulling back then evaluating, and just evaluating. -/
@[simps!]
def comapEvalIsoEval (h : J → I) (j : J) : comap C h ⋙ eval (C ∘ h) j ≅ eval C (h j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun f => Iso.refl _) (by simp only [Iso.refl]; aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.pi.comap_eval_iso_eval CategoryTheory.Pi.comapEvalIsoEval
end
section
variable {J : Type w₀} {D : J → Type u₁} [∀ j, Category.{v₁} (D j)]
/- Porting note: maybe mixing up universes -/
instance sumElimCategory : ∀ s : Sum I J, Category.{v₁} (Sum.elim C D s)
| Sum.inl i => by
dsimp
infer_instance
| Sum.inr j => by
dsimp
infer_instance
#align category_theory.pi.sum_elim_category CategoryTheory.Pi.sumElimCategoryₓ
/- Porting note: replaced `Sum.rec` with `match`'s per the error about
current state of code generation -/
/-- The bifunctor combining an `I`-indexed family of objects with a `J`-indexed family of objects
to obtain an `I ⊕ J`-indexed family of objects.
-/
@[simps]
def sum : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ (∀ j, D j) ⥤ ∀ s : Sum I J, Sum.elim C D s where
obj X :=
{ obj := fun Y s =>
match s with
| .inl i => X i
| .inr j => Y j
map := fun {Y} {Y'} f s =>
match s with
| .inl i => 𝟙 (X i)
| .inr j => f j }
map {X} {X'} f :=
{ app := fun Y s =>
match s with
| .inl i => f i
| .inr j => 𝟙 (Y j) }
#align category_theory.pi.sum CategoryTheory.Pi.sum
end
variable {C}
/-- An isomorphism between `I`-indexed objects gives an isomorphism between each
pair of corresponding components. -/
@[simps]
def isoApp {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (i : I) : X i ≅ Y i :=
⟨f.hom i, f.inv i,
by rw [← comp_apply, Iso.hom_inv_id, id_apply], by rw [← comp_apply, Iso.inv_hom_id, id_apply]⟩
#align category_theory.pi.iso_app CategoryTheory.Pi.isoApp
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_refl (X : ∀ i, C i) (i : I) : isoApp (Iso.refl X) i = Iso.refl (X i) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.iso_app_refl CategoryTheory.Pi.isoApp_refl
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_symm {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (i : I) : isoApp f.symm i = (isoApp f i).symm :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.iso_app_symm CategoryTheory.Pi.isoApp_symm
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_trans {X Y Z : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (i : I) :
isoApp (f ≪≫ g) i = isoApp f i ≪≫ isoApp g i :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.iso_app_trans CategoryTheory.Pi.isoApp_trans
end Pi
namespace Functor
variable {C}
variable {D : I → Type u₂} [∀ i, Category.{v₂} (D i)] {A : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} A]
/-- Assemble an `I`-indexed family of functors into a functor between the pi types.
-/
@[simps]
def pi (F : ∀ i, C i ⥤ D i) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ ∀ i, D i where
obj f i := (F i).obj (f i)
map α i := (F i).map (α i)
#align category_theory.functor.pi CategoryTheory.Functor.pi
/-- Similar to `pi`, but all functors come from the same category `A`
-/
@[simps]
def pi' (f : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) : A ⥤ ∀ i, C i where
obj a i := (f i).obj a
map h i := (f i).map h
#align category_theory.functor.pi' CategoryTheory.Functor.pi'
/-- The projections of `Functor.pi' F` are isomorphic to the functors of the family `F` -/
@[simps!]
def pi'CompEval {A : Type*} [Category A] (F : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) (i : I) :
pi' F ⋙ Pi.eval C i ≅ F i :=
Iso.refl _
section EqToHom
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_proj {x x' : ∀ i, C i} (h : x = x') (i : I) :
(eqToHom h : x ⟶ x') i = eqToHom (Function.funext_iff.mp h i) := by
subst h
rfl
#align category_theory.functor.eq_to_hom_proj CategoryTheory.Functor.eqToHom_proj
end EqToHom
-- One could add some natural isomorphisms showing
-- how `Functor.pi` commutes with `Pi.eval` and `Pi.comap`.
@[simp]
theorem pi'_eval (f : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) (i : I) : pi' f ⋙ Pi.eval C i = f i := by
apply Functor.ext
· intro _ _ _
simp
· intro _
rfl
#align category_theory.functor.pi'_eval CategoryTheory.Functor.pi'_eval
/-- Two functors to a product category are equal iff they agree on every coordinate. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Pi/Basic.lean | 246 | 259 | theorem pi_ext (f f' : A ⥤ ∀ i, C i) (h : ∀ i, f ⋙ (Pi.eval C i) = f' ⋙ (Pi.eval C i)) :
f = f' := by |
apply Functor.ext; rotate_left
· intro X
ext i
specialize h i
have := congr_obj h X
simpa
· intro X Y g
dsimp
funext i
specialize h i
have := congr_hom h g
simpa
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
#align_import data.polynomial.splits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# Split polynomials
A polynomial `f : K[X]` splits over a field extension `L` of `K` if it is zero or all of its
irreducible factors over `L` have degree `1`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Splits i f`: A predicate on a homomorphism `i : K →+* L` from a commutative ring to a
field and a polynomial `f` saying that `f.map i` is zero or all of its irreducible factors over
`L` have degree `1`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {F : Type u} {K : Type v} {L : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial
section Splits
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable (i : K →+* L)
/-- A polynomial `Splits` iff it is zero or all of its irreducible factors have `degree` 1. -/
def Splits (f : K[X]) : Prop :=
f.map i = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
#align polynomial.splits Polynomial.Splits
@[simp]
theorem splits_zero : Splits i (0 : K[X]) :=
Or.inl (Polynomial.map_zero i)
#align polynomial.splits_zero Polynomial.splits_zero
theorem splits_of_map_eq_C {f : K[X]} {a : L} (h : f.map i = C a) : Splits i f :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if ha : a = 0 then Or.inl (h.trans (ha.symm ▸ C_0))
else
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ =>
absurd hg.1 <|
Classical.not_not.2 <|
isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 <| by
have := congr_arg degree hp
rw [h, degree_C ha, degree_mul, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 0,
Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact this.1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_of_map_eq_C Polynomial.splits_of_map_eq_C
@[simp]
theorem splits_C (a : K) : Splits i (C a) :=
splits_of_map_eq_C i (map_C i)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_C Polynomial.splits_C
theorem splits_of_map_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree (f.map i) = 1) : Splits i f :=
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ => by
have := congr_arg degree hp
simp [Nat.WithBot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 1,
mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this
tauto
#align polynomial.splits_of_map_degree_eq_one Polynomial.splits_of_map_degree_eq_one
theorem splits_of_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
if hif : degree (f.map i) ≤ 0 then splits_of_map_eq_C i (degree_le_zero_iff.mp hif)
else by
push_neg at hif
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, ← WithBot.coe_zero, WithBot.succ_coe, Nat.succ_eq_succ] at hif
exact splits_of_map_degree_eq_one i (le_antisymm ((degree_map_le i _).trans hf) hif)
#align polynomial.splits_of_degree_le_one Polynomial.splits_of_degree_le_one
theorem splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i hf.le
#align polynomial.splits_of_degree_eq_one Polynomial.splits_of_degree_eq_one
theorem splits_of_natDegree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i (degree_le_of_natDegree_le hf)
#align polynomial.splits_of_nat_degree_le_one Polynomial.splits_of_natDegree_le_one
theorem splits_of_natDegree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_natDegree_le_one i (le_of_eq hf)
#align polynomial.splits_of_nat_degree_eq_one Polynomial.splits_of_natDegree_eq_one
theorem splits_mul {f g : K[X]} (hf : Splits i f) (hg : Splits i g) : Splits i (f * g) :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if h : (f * g).map i = 0 then Or.inl h
else
Or.inr @fun p hp hpf =>
((irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g by convert hpf; rw [Polynomial.map_mul])).elim
(hf.resolve_left (fun hf => by simp [hf] at h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (fun hg => by simp [hg] at h) hp)
#align polynomial.splits_mul Polynomial.splits_mul
theorem splits_of_splits_mul' {f g : K[X]} (hfg : (f * g).map i ≠ 0) (h : Splits i (f * g)) :
Splits i f ∧ Splits i g :=
⟨Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
#align polynomial.splits_of_splits_mul' Polynomial.splits_of_splits_mul'
theorem splits_map_iff (j : L →+* F) {f : K[X]} : Splits j (f.map i) ↔ Splits (j.comp i) f := by
simp [Splits, Polynomial.map_map]
#align polynomial.splits_map_iff Polynomial.splits_map_iff
theorem splits_one : Splits i 1 :=
splits_C i 1
#align polynomial.splits_one Polynomial.splits_one
theorem splits_of_isUnit [IsDomain K] {u : K[X]} (hu : IsUnit u) : u.Splits i :=
(isUnit_iff.mp hu).choose_spec.2 ▸ splits_C _ _
#align polynomial.splits_of_is_unit Polynomial.splits_of_isUnit
theorem splits_X_sub_C {x : K} : (X - C x).Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ <| degree_X_sub_C_le _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_X_sub_C Polynomial.splits_X_sub_C
theorem splits_X : X.Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ degree_X_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_X Polynomial.splits_X
theorem splits_prod {ι : Type u} {s : ι → K[X]} {t : Finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, (s j).Splits i) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x).Splits i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ => splits_one i) fun a t hat ih ht => ?_
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at ht; rw [Finset.prod_insert hat]
exact splits_mul i ht.1 (ih ht.2)
#align polynomial.splits_prod Polynomial.splits_prod
theorem splits_pow {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (n : ℕ) : (f ^ n).Splits i := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact splits_prod i fun j _ => hf
#align polynomial.splits_pow Polynomial.splits_pow
theorem splits_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).Splits i :=
splits_pow i (splits_X i) n
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_X_pow Polynomial.splits_X_pow
theorem splits_id_iff_splits {f : K[X]} : (f.map i).Splits (RingHom.id L) ↔ f.Splits i := by
rw [splits_map_iff, RingHom.id_comp]
#align polynomial.splits_id_iff_splits Polynomial.splits_id_iff_splits
theorem exists_root_of_splits' {f : K[X]} (hs : Splits i f) (hf0 : degree (f.map i) ≠ 0) :
∃ x, eval₂ i x f = 0 :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if hf0' : f.map i = 0 then by simp [eval₂_eq_eval_map, hf0']
else
let ⟨g, hg⟩ :=
WfDvdMonoid.exists_irreducible_factor
(show ¬IsUnit (f.map i) from mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hf0) hf0'
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (hs.resolve_left hf0' hg.1 hg.2)
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hg.2
⟨x, by rw [← eval_map, hi, eval_mul, show _ = _ from hx, zero_mul]⟩
#align polynomial.exists_root_of_splits' Polynomial.exists_root_of_splits'
theorem roots_ne_zero_of_splits' {f : K[X]} (hs : Splits i f) (hf0 : natDegree (f.map i) ≠ 0) :
(f.map i).roots ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_splits' i hs fun h => hf0 <| natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some h
fun h => by
rw [← eval_map] at hx
have : f.map i ≠ 0 := by intro; simp_all
cases h.subst ((mem_roots this).2 hx)
#align polynomial.roots_ne_zero_of_splits' Polynomial.roots_ne_zero_of_splits'
/-- Pick a root of a polynomial that splits. See `rootOfSplits` for polynomials over a field
which has simpler assumptions. -/
def rootOfSplits' {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (hfd : (f.map i).degree ≠ 0) : L :=
Classical.choose <| exists_root_of_splits' i hf hfd
#align polynomial.root_of_splits' Polynomial.rootOfSplits'
theorem map_rootOfSplits' {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (hfd) :
f.eval₂ i (rootOfSplits' i hf hfd) = 0 :=
Classical.choose_spec <| exists_root_of_splits' i hf hfd
#align polynomial.map_root_of_splits' Polynomial.map_rootOfSplits'
theorem natDegree_eq_card_roots' {p : K[X]} {i : K →+* L} (hsplit : Splits i p) :
(p.map i).natDegree = Multiset.card (p.map i).roots := by
by_cases hp : p.map i = 0
· rw [hp, natDegree_zero, roots_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
obtain ⟨q, he, hd, hr⟩ := exists_prod_multiset_X_sub_C_mul (p.map i)
rw [← splits_id_iff_splits, ← he] at hsplit
rw [← he] at hp
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun h => hp (by rw [h, mul_zero])
rw [← hd, add_right_eq_self]
by_contra h
have h' : (map (RingHom.id L) q).natDegree ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
have := roots_ne_zero_of_splits' (RingHom.id L) (splits_of_splits_mul' _ ?_ hsplit).2 h'
· rw [map_id] at this
exact this hr
· rw [map_id]
exact mul_ne_zero monic_prod_multiset_X_sub_C.ne_zero hq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_card_roots' Polynomial.natDegree_eq_card_roots'
theorem degree_eq_card_roots' {p : K[X]} {i : K →+* L} (p_ne_zero : p.map i ≠ 0)
(hsplit : Splits i p) : (p.map i).degree = Multiset.card (p.map i).roots := by
simp [degree_eq_natDegree p_ne_zero, natDegree_eq_card_roots' hsplit]
#align polynomial.degree_eq_card_roots' Polynomial.degree_eq_card_roots'
end CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [Field K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable (i : K →+* L)
/-- This lemma is for polynomials over a field. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Splits.lean | 230 | 232 | theorem splits_iff (f : K[X]) :
Splits i f ↔ f = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1 := by |
rw [Splits, map_eq_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Asymptotics
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.continuity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b9eaaa7686280fad8cce467f5c3c57ee6ce77f8"
/-!
# Continuity of power functions
This file contains lemmas about continuity of the power functions on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real Topology NNReal ENNReal Filter ComplexConjugate
open Filter Finset Set
section CpowLimits
/-!
## Continuity for complex powers
-/
open Complex
variable {α : Type*}
theorem zero_cpow_eq_nhds {b : ℂ} (hb : b ≠ 0) : (fun x : ℂ => (0 : ℂ) ^ x) =ᶠ[𝓝 b] 0 := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℂ in 𝓝 b, x ≠ 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [zero_cpow hx, Pi.zero_apply]
exact IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne hb
#align zero_cpow_eq_nhds zero_cpow_eq_nhds
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Continuity.lean | 44 | 50 | theorem cpow_eq_nhds {a b : ℂ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(fun x => x ^ b) =ᶠ[𝓝 a] fun x => exp (log x * b) := by |
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℂ in 𝓝 a, x ≠ 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx]
exact IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne ha
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import algebra.gcd_monoid.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"550b58538991c8977703fdeb7c9d51a5aa27df11"
/-!
# Monoids with normalization functions, `gcd`, and `lcm`
This file defines extra structures on `CancelCommMonoidWithZero`s, including `IsDomain`s.
## Main Definitions
* `NormalizationMonoid`
* `GCDMonoid`
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid`
* `gcdMonoid_of_gcd`, `gcdMonoid_of_exists_gcd`, `normalizedGCDMonoid_of_gcd`,
`normalizedGCDMonoid_of_exists_gcd`
* `gcdMonoid_of_lcm`, `gcdMonoid_of_exists_lcm`, `normalizedGCDMonoid_of_lcm`,
`normalizedGCDMonoid_of_exists_lcm`
For the `NormalizedGCDMonoid` instances on `ℕ` and `ℤ`, see `Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat`.
## Implementation Notes
* `NormalizationMonoid` is defined by assigning to each element a `normUnit` such that multiplying
by that unit normalizes the monoid, and `normalize` is an idempotent monoid homomorphism. This
definition as currently implemented does casework on `0`.
* `GCDMonoid` contains the definitions of `gcd` and `lcm` with the usual properties. They are
both determined up to a unit.
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid` extends `NormalizationMonoid`, so the `gcd` and `lcm` are always
normalized. This makes `gcd`s of polynomials easier to work with, but excludes Euclidean domains,
and monoids without zero.
* `gcdMonoid_of_gcd` and `normalizedGCDMonoid_of_gcd` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `gcd` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoid_of_exists_gcd` and `normalizedGCDMonoid_of_exists_gcd` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `gcd`.
* `gcdMonoid_of_lcm` and `normalizedGCDMonoid_of_lcm` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `lcm` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoid_of_exists_lcm` and `normalizedGCDMonoid_of_exists_lcm` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `lcm`.
## TODO
* Port GCD facts about nats, definition of coprime
* Generalize normalization monoids to commutative (cancellative) monoids with or without zero
## Tags
divisibility, gcd, lcm, normalize
-/
variable {α : Type*}
-- Porting note: mathlib3 had a `@[protect_proj]` here, but adding `protected` to all the fields
-- adds unnecessary clutter to later code
/-- Normalization monoid: multiplying with `normUnit` gives a normal form for associated
elements. -/
class NormalizationMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- `normUnit` assigns to each element of the monoid a unit of the monoid. -/
normUnit : α → αˣ
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps `0` to the identity. -/
normUnit_zero : normUnit 0 = 1
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` respects multiplication of non-zero elements. -/
normUnit_mul : ∀ {a b}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → normUnit (a * b) = normUnit a * normUnit b
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps units to their inverses. -/
normUnit_coe_units : ∀ u : αˣ, normUnit u = u⁻¹
#align normalization_monoid NormalizationMonoid
export NormalizationMonoid (normUnit normUnit_zero normUnit_mul normUnit_coe_units)
attribute [simp] normUnit_coe_units normUnit_zero normUnit_mul
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_one : normUnit (1 : α) = 1 :=
normUnit_coe_units 1
#align norm_unit_one normUnit_one
-- Porting note (#11083): quite slow. Improve performance?
/-- Chooses an element of each associate class, by multiplying by `normUnit` -/
def normalize : α →*₀ α where
toFun x := x * normUnit x
map_zero' := by
simp only [normUnit_zero]
exact mul_one (0:α)
map_one' := by dsimp only; rw [normUnit_one, one_mul]; rfl
map_mul' x y :=
(by_cases fun hx : x = 0 => by dsimp only; rw [hx, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]) fun hx =>
(by_cases fun hy : y = 0 => by dsimp only; rw [hy, mul_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero]) fun hy => by
simp only [normUnit_mul hx hy, Units.val_mul]; simp only [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm y]
#align normalize normalize
theorem associated_normalize (x : α) : Associated x (normalize x) :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
#align associated_normalize associated_normalize
theorem normalize_associated (x : α) : Associated (normalize x) x :=
(associated_normalize _).symm
#align normalize_associated normalize_associated
theorem associated_normalize_iff {x y : α} : Associated x (normalize y) ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (normalize_associated y), fun h => h.trans (associated_normalize y)⟩
#align associated_normalize_iff associated_normalize_iff
theorem normalize_associated_iff {x y : α} : Associated (normalize x) y ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => (associated_normalize _).trans h, fun h => (normalize_associated _).trans h⟩
#align normalize_associated_iff normalize_associated_iff
theorem Associates.mk_normalize (x : α) : Associates.mk (normalize x) = Associates.mk x :=
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (normalize_associated _)
#align associates.mk_normalize Associates.mk_normalize
@[simp]
theorem normalize_apply (x : α) : normalize x = x * normUnit x :=
rfl
#align normalize_apply normalize_apply
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem normalize_zero : normalize (0 : α) = 0 :=
normalize.map_zero
#align normalize_zero normalize_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem normalize_one : normalize (1 : α) = 1 :=
normalize.map_one
#align normalize_one normalize_one
theorem normalize_coe_units (u : αˣ) : normalize (u : α) = 1 := by simp
#align normalize_coe_units normalize_coe_units
theorem normalize_eq_zero {x : α} : normalize x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun hx => (associated_zero_iff_eq_zero x).1 <| hx ▸ associated_normalize _, by
rintro rfl; exact normalize_zero⟩
#align normalize_eq_zero normalize_eq_zero
theorem normalize_eq_one {x : α} : normalize x = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun hx => isUnit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨_, hx⟩, fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ normalize_coe_units u⟩
#align normalize_eq_one normalize_eq_one
-- Porting note (#11083): quite slow. Improve performance?
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_mul_normUnit (a : α) : normUnit (a * normUnit a) = 1 := by
nontriviality α using Subsingleton.elim a 0
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [normUnit_zero, zero_mul, normUnit_zero]
· rw [normUnit_mul h (Units.ne_zero _), normUnit_coe_units, mul_inv_eq_one]
#align norm_unit_mul_norm_unit normUnit_mul_normUnit
theorem normalize_idem (x : α) : normalize (normalize x) = normalize x := by simp
#align normalize_idem normalize_idem
theorem normalize_eq_normalize {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
normalize a = normalize b := by
nontriviality α
rcases associated_of_dvd_dvd hab hba with ⟨u, rfl⟩
refine by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 => ?_
suffices a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ by
simpa only [normalize_apply, mul_assoc, normUnit_mul ha u.ne_zero, normUnit_coe_units]
calc
a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u * ↑u⁻¹ := (Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
_ = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ := by rw [mul_right_comm a]
#align normalize_eq_normalize normalize_eq_normalize
theorem normalize_eq_normalize_iff {x y : α} : normalize x = normalize y ↔ x ∣ y ∧ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h.symm⟩, Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h⟩⟩, fun ⟨hxy, hyx⟩ =>
normalize_eq_normalize hxy hyx⟩
#align normalize_eq_normalize_iff normalize_eq_normalize_iff
theorem dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq {a b : α} (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b)
(hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ normalize_eq_normalize hab hba
#align dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq
theorem Associated.eq_of_normalized
{a b : α} (h : Associated a b) (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b) :
a = b :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq ha hb h.dvd h.dvd'
--can be proven by simp
theorem dvd_normalize_iff {a b : α} : a ∣ normalize b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.dvd_mul_right
#align dvd_normalize_iff dvd_normalize_iff
--can be proven by simp
theorem normalize_dvd_iff {a b : α} : normalize a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.mul_right_dvd
#align normalize_dvd_iff normalize_dvd_iff
end NormalizationMonoid
namespace Associates
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
/-- Maps an element of `Associates` back to the normalized element of its associate class -/
protected def out : Associates α → α :=
(Quotient.lift (normalize : α → α)) fun a _ ⟨_, hu⟩ =>
hu ▸ normalize_eq_normalize ⟨_, rfl⟩ (Units.mul_right_dvd.2 <| dvd_refl a)
#align associates.out Associates.out
@[simp]
theorem out_mk (a : α) : (Associates.mk a).out = normalize a :=
rfl
#align associates.out_mk Associates.out_mk
@[simp]
theorem out_one : (1 : Associates α).out = 1 :=
normalize_one
#align associates.out_one Associates.out_one
theorem out_mul (a b : Associates α) : (a * b).out = a.out * b.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ => by
simp only [Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, out_mk, mk_mul_mk, normalize.map_mul]
#align associates.out_mul Associates.out_mul
theorem dvd_out_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : a ∣ b.out ↔ Associates.mk a ≤ b :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
#align associates.dvd_out_iff Associates.dvd_out_iff
theorem out_dvd_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : b.out ∣ a ↔ b ≤ Associates.mk a :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
#align associates.out_dvd_iff Associates.out_dvd_iff
@[simp]
theorem out_top : (⊤ : Associates α).out = 0 :=
normalize_zero
#align associates.out_top Associates.out_top
-- Porting note: lower priority to avoid linter complaints about simp-normal form
@[simp 1100]
theorem normalize_out (a : Associates α) : normalize a.out = a.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn a normalize_idem
#align associates.normalize_out Associates.normalize_out
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk a.out = a :=
Quotient.inductionOn a mk_normalize
#align associates.mk_out Associates.mk_out
theorem out_injective : Function.Injective (Associates.out : _ → α) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective mk_out
#align associates.out_injective Associates.out_injective
end Associates
-- Porting note: mathlib3 had a `@[protect_proj]` here, but adding `protected` to all the fields
-- adds unnecessary clutter to later code
/-- GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with `gcd` (greatest common divisor) and
`lcm` (least common multiple) operations, determined up to a unit. The type class focuses on `gcd`
and we derive the corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class GCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- The greatest common divisor between two elements. -/
gcd : α → α → α
/-- The least common multiple between two elements. -/
lcm : α → α → α
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the first element. -/
gcd_dvd_left : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ a
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the second element. -/
gcd_dvd_right : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ b
/-- Any common divisor of both elements is a divisor of the GCD. -/
dvd_gcd : ∀ {a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b
/-- The product of two elements is `Associated` with the product of their GCD and LCM. -/
gcd_mul_lcm : ∀ a b, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b)
/-- `0` is left-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_left : ∀ a, lcm 0 a = 0
/-- `0` is right-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_right : ∀ a, lcm a 0 = 0
#align gcd_monoid GCDMonoid
/-- Normalized GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with normalization and `gcd`
(greatest common divisor) and `lcm` (least common multiple) operations. In this setting `gcd` and
`lcm` form a bounded lattice on the associated elements where `gcd` is the infimum, `lcm` is the
supremum, `1` is bottom, and `0` is top. The type class focuses on `gcd` and we derive the
corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class NormalizedGCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] extends NormalizationMonoid α,
GCDMonoid α where
/-- The GCD is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_gcd : ∀ a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b
/-- The LCM is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_lcm : ∀ a b, normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b
#align normalized_gcd_monoid NormalizedGCDMonoid
export GCDMonoid (gcd lcm gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right dvd_gcd lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right)
attribute [simp] lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right
section GCDMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
instance [NormalizationMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [GCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
theorem gcd_isUnit_iff_isRelPrime [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} :
IsUnit (gcd a b) ↔ IsRelPrime a b :=
⟨fun h _ ha hb ↦ isUnit_of_dvd_unit (dvd_gcd ha hb) h, (· (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b))⟩
-- Porting note: lower priority to avoid linter complaints about simp-normal form
@[simp 1100]
theorem normalize_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd
#align normalize_gcd normalize_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm [GCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b) :=
GCDMonoid.gcd_mul_lcm
#align gcd_mul_lcm gcd_mul_lcm
section GCD
theorem dvd_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) : a ∣ gcd b c ↔ a ∣ b ∧ a ∣ c :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.trans (gcd_dvd_left _ _), h.trans (gcd_dvd_right _ _)⟩) fun ⟨hab, hac⟩ =>
dvd_gcd hab hac
#align dvd_gcd_iff dvd_gcd_iff
theorem gcd_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = gcd b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
#align gcd_comm gcd_comm
theorem gcd_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (gcd a b) (gcd b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
#align gcd_comm' gcd_comm'
theorem gcd_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
#align gcd_assoc gcd_assoc
theorem gcd_assoc' [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : Associated (gcd (gcd m n) k) (gcd m (gcd n k)) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
#align gcd_assoc' gcd_assoc'
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Commutative (α := α) gcd where
comm := gcd_comm
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Associative (α := α) gcd where
assoc := gcd_assoc
theorem gcd_eq_normalize [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (habc : gcd a b ∣ c)
(hcab : c ∣ gcd a b) : gcd a b = normalize c :=
normalize_gcd a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
#align gcd_eq_normalize gcd_eq_normalize
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 0 a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
#align gcd_zero_left gcd_zero_left
theorem gcd_zero_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 0 a) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
#align gcd_zero_left' gcd_zero_left'
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 0 = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
#align gcd_zero_right gcd_zero_right
theorem gcd_zero_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 0) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
#align gcd_zero_right' gcd_zero_right'
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨ca, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left a b
let ⟨cb, hb⟩ := gcd_dvd_right a b
rw [h, zero_mul] at ha hb
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩)
fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => by
rw [ha, hb, ← zero_dvd_iff]
apply dvd_gcd <;> rfl
#align gcd_eq_zero_iff gcd_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (one_dvd _)
#align gcd_one_left gcd_one_left
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_left [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd 1 a) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
theorem gcd_one_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 1 a) 1 := by simp
#align gcd_one_left' gcd_one_left'
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 1 = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (one_dvd _)
#align gcd_one_right gcd_one_right
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_right [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd a 1) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _)
theorem gcd_one_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 1) 1 := by simp
#align gcd_one_right' gcd_one_right'
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : gcd a c ∣ gcd b d :=
dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left _ _).trans hab) ((gcd_dvd_right _ _).trans hcd)
#align gcd_dvd_gcd gcd_dvd_gcd
protected theorem Associated.gcd [GCDMonoid α]
{a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : Associated a₁ a₂) (hb : Associated b₁ b₂) :
Associated (gcd a₁ b₁) (gcd a₂ b₂) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd hb.dvd) (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd' hb.dvd')
@[simp]
theorem gcd_same [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_refl a))
#align gcd_same gcd_same
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * gcd b c :=
(by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left, normalize_zero]))
fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
suffices gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * gcd b c) by simpa
let ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
gcd_eq_normalize
(eq.symm ▸ mul_dvd_mul_left a
(show d ∣ gcd b c from
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)))
(dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _))
#align gcd_mul_left gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_mul_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (a * b) (a * c)) (a * gcd b c) := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left']
obtain ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
apply associated_of_dvd_dvd
· rw [eq]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left
exact
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)
· exact dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _)
#align gcd_mul_left' gcd_mul_left'
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (b * a) (c * a) = gcd b c * normalize a := by simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left]
#align gcd_mul_right gcd_mul_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (b * a) (c * a)) (gcd b c * a) := by
simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left']
#align gcd_mul_right' gcd_mul_right'
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) :
gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _) fun hab =>
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) h (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) hab)
#align gcd_eq_left_iff gcd_eq_left_iff
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) :
gcd a b = b ↔ b ∣ a := by simpa only [gcd_comm a b] using gcd_eq_left_iff b a h
#align gcd_eq_right_iff gcd_eq_right_iff
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left _ _) dvd_rfl
#align gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) dvd_rfl
#align gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_left _ _)
#align gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd m k = gcd n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd h.dvd dvd_rfl)
(gcd_dvd_gcd h.symm.dvd dvd_rfl)
#align associated.gcd_eq_left Associated.gcd_eq_left
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd k m = gcd k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.dvd)
(gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.symm.dvd)
#align associated.gcd_eq_right Associated.gcd_eq_right
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ gcd k m * n :=
(dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ n) H).trans (gcd_mul_right' n k m).dvd
#align dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ gcd k m * n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k m) dvd_rfl), dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul⟩
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m * gcd k n := by
rw [mul_comm] at H ⊢
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
#align dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ m * gcd k n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul dvd_rfl (gcd_dvd_right k n)), dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul⟩
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`.
Note: In general, this representation is highly non-unique.
See `Nat.prodDvdAndDvdOfDvdProd` for a constructive version on `ℕ`. -/
instance [h : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α)] : DecompositionMonoid α where
primal k m n H := by
cases h
by_cases h0 : gcd k m = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at h0
rcases h0 with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨0, n, dvd_refl 0, dvd_refl n, by simp⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left k m
refine ⟨gcd k m, a, gcd_dvd_right _ _, ?_, ha⟩
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h0, ← ha]
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd [GCDMonoid α] (k m n : α) : gcd k (m * n) ∣ gcd k m * gcd k n := by
obtain ⟨m', n', hm', hn', h⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k (m * n))
replace h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n' := h
rw [h]
have hm'n' : m' * n' ∣ k := h ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _
apply mul_dvd_mul
· have hm'k : m' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_right m' n').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hm'k hm'
· have hn'k : n' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_left n' m').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hn'k hn'
#align gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd
theorem gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} :
gcd a (b ^ k) ∣ gcd a b ^ k := by
by_cases hg : gcd a b = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact
(gcd_zero_left' (0 ^ k : α)).dvd.trans
(pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_zero_left' (0 : α)).symm.dvd _)
· induction' k with k hk
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
exact (gcd_one_right' a).dvd
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ']
trans gcd a b * gcd a (b ^ k)
· exact gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd a b (b ^ k)
· exact (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hg).mpr hk
#align gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd
theorem gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} : gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd a b ^ k :=
calc
gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd b (a ^ k) := (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd
_ ∣ gcd b a ^ k := gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd
_ ∣ gcd a b ^ k := pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd _
#align gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd
theorem pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d₁ d₂ : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) (hc : c = d₁ * d₂) (hd₁ : d₁ ∣ a) : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 ∧ d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
have h1 : IsUnit (gcd (d₁ ^ k) b) := by
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
trans gcd d₁ b ^ k
· exact gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd
· apply IsUnit.dvd
apply IsUnit.pow
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
apply dvd_trans _ hab.dvd
apply gcd_dvd_gcd hd₁ (dvd_refl b)
have h2 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a * b := by
use d₂ ^ k
rw [h, hc]
exact mul_pow d₁ d₂ k
rw [mul_comm] at h2
have h3 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
apply (dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul h2).trans
rw [h1.mul_left_dvd]
have h4 : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 := by
intro hdk
rw [hdk] at h3
apply absurd (zero_dvd_iff.mp h3) ha
exact ⟨h4, h3⟩
#align pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Basic.lean | 625 | 663 | theorem exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, Associated (d ^ k) a := by |
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· use 0
rw [Subsingleton.elim a (0 ^ k)]
by_cases ha : a = 0
· use 0
obtain rfl | hk := eq_or_ne k 0
· simp [ha] at h
· rw [ha, zero_pow hk]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· use 1
rw [one_pow]
apply (associated_one_iff_isUnit.mpr hab).symm.trans
rw [hb]
exact gcd_zero_right' a
obtain rfl | hk := k.eq_zero_or_pos
· use 1
rw [pow_zero] at h ⊢
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, one_mul]
have hc : c ∣ a * b := by
rw [h]
exact dvd_pow_self _ hk.ne'
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, hd₁, hd₂, hc⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul hc
use d₁
obtain ⟨h0₁, ⟨a', ha'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow ha hab h hc hd₁
rw [mul_comm] at h hc
rw [(gcd_comm' a b).isUnit_iff] at hab
obtain ⟨h0₂, ⟨b', hb'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow hb hab h hc hd₂
rw [ha', hb', hc, mul_pow] at h
have h' : a' * b' = 1 := by
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₁).mp
rw [mul_one]
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₂).mp
rw [← h]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm a', ← mul_assoc _ b', ← mul_assoc b', mul_comm b']
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h'
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, ha']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import order.symm_diff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6eb334bd8f3433d5b08ba156b8ec3e6af47e1904"
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
#align symm_diff symmDiff
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
#align bihimp bihimp
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_def symmDiff_def
theorem bihimp_def [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
#align bihimp_def bihimp_def
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_eq_xor symmDiff_eq_Xor'
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _).symm.trans Iff.comm
#align bihimp_iff_iff bihimp_iff_iff
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
#align bool.symm_diff_eq_bxor Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_symm_diff toDual_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_bihimp ofDual_bihimp
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
#align symm_diff_comm symmDiff_comm
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
#align symm_diff_is_comm symmDiff_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
#align symm_diff_self symmDiff_self
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_bot symmDiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
#align bot_symm_diff bot_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
#align symm_diff_eq_bot symmDiff_eq_bot
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_le symmDiff_of_le
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_ge symmDiff_of_ge
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
#align symm_diff_le symmDiff_le
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align symm_diff_le_iff symmDiff_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
#align symm_diff_le_sup symmDiff_le_sup
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.symm_diff_eq_sup Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
#align symm_diff_sdiff symmDiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_sdiff_inf symmDiff_sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
#align symm_diff_sdiff_eq_sup symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_symm_diff_eq_sup sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
#align symm_diff_sup_inf symmDiff_sup_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align inf_sup_symm_diff inf_sup_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align symm_diff_symm_diff_inf symmDiff_symmDiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
#align inf_symm_diff_symm_diff inf_symmDiff_symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_triangle symmDiff_triangle
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_bihimp toDual_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_symm_diff ofDual_symmDiff
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
#align bihimp_comm bihimp_comm
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
#align bihimp_is_comm bihimp_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
#align bihimp_self bihimp_self
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
#align bihimp_top bihimp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
#align top_bihimp top_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_eq_top bihimp_eq_top
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
#align bihimp_of_le bihimp_of_le
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
#align bihimp_of_ge bihimp_of_ge
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
#align le_bihimp le_bihimp
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
#align le_bihimp_iff le_bihimp_iff
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
#align inf_le_bihimp inf_le_bihimp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
#align bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
#align codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
#align himp_bihimp himp_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
#align sup_himp_bihimp sup_himp_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_himp_eq_inf bihimp_himp_eq_inf
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align himp_bihimp_eq_inf himp_bihimp_eq_inf
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_inf_sup bihimp_inf_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align sup_inf_bihimp sup_inf_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_bihimp_sup bihimp_bihimp_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align sup_bihimp_bihimp sup_bihimp_bihimp
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align bihimp_triangle bihimp_triangle
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_top' symmDiff_top'
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
#align top_symm_diff' top_symmDiff'
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
#align hnot_symm_diff_self hnot_symmDiff_self
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
#align symm_diff_hnot_self symmDiff_hnot_self
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
#align is_compl.symm_diff_eq_top IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
#align bihimp_bot bihimp_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
#align bot_bihimp bot_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
#align compl_bihimp_self compl_bihimp_self
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
#align bihimp_hnot_self bihimp_hnot_self
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
#align is_compl.bihimp_eq_bot IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
#align sup_sdiff_symm_diff sup_sdiff_symmDiff
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 403 | 405 | theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by |
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.SeqFocus
/-! ## Ordering -/
namespace Ordering
@[simp] theorem swap_swap {o : Ordering} : o.swap.swap = o := by cases o <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem swap_inj {o₁ o₂ : Ordering} : o₁.swap = o₂.swap ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using congrArg swap h, congrArg _⟩
theorem swap_then (o₁ o₂ : Ordering) : (o₁.then o₂).swap = o₁.swap.then o₂.swap := by
cases o₁ <;> rfl
theorem then_eq_lt {o₁ o₂ : Ordering} : o₁.then o₂ = lt ↔ o₁ = lt ∨ o₁ = eq ∧ o₂ = lt := by
cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> decide
theorem then_eq_eq {o₁ o₂ : Ordering} : o₁.then o₂ = eq ↔ o₁ = eq ∧ o₂ = eq := by
cases o₁ <;> simp [«then»]
theorem then_eq_gt {o₁ o₂ : Ordering} : o₁.then o₂ = gt ↔ o₁ = gt ∨ o₁ = eq ∧ o₂ = gt := by
cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> decide
end Ordering
namespace Batteries
/-- `TotalBLE le` asserts that `le` has a total order, that is, `le a b ∨ le b a`. -/
class TotalBLE (le : α → α → Bool) : Prop where
/-- `le` is total: either `le a b` or `le b a`. -/
total : le a b ∨ le b a
/-- `OrientedCmp cmp` asserts that `cmp` is determined by the relation `cmp x y = .lt`. -/
class OrientedCmp (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : Prop where
/-- The comparator operation is symmetric, in the sense that if `cmp x y` equals `.lt` then
`cmp y x = .gt` and vice versa. -/
symm (x y) : (cmp x y).swap = cmp y x
namespace OrientedCmp
theorem cmp_eq_gt [OrientedCmp cmp] : cmp x y = .gt ↔ cmp y x = .lt := by
rw [← Ordering.swap_inj, symm]; exact .rfl
theorem cmp_ne_gt [OrientedCmp cmp] : cmp x y ≠ .gt ↔ cmp y x ≠ .lt := not_congr cmp_eq_gt
theorem cmp_eq_eq_symm [OrientedCmp cmp] : cmp x y = .eq ↔ cmp y x = .eq := by
rw [← Ordering.swap_inj, symm]; exact .rfl
theorem cmp_refl [OrientedCmp cmp] : cmp x x = .eq :=
match e : cmp x x with
| .lt => nomatch e.symm.trans (cmp_eq_gt.2 e)
| .eq => rfl
| .gt => nomatch (cmp_eq_gt.1 e).symm.trans e
end OrientedCmp
/-- `TransCmp cmp` asserts that `cmp` induces a transitive relation. -/
class TransCmp (cmp : α → α → Ordering) extends OrientedCmp cmp : Prop where
/-- The comparator operation is transitive. -/
le_trans : cmp x y ≠ .gt → cmp y z ≠ .gt → cmp x z ≠ .gt
namespace TransCmp
variable [TransCmp cmp]
open OrientedCmp Decidable
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Classes/Order.lean | 71 | 73 | theorem ge_trans (h₁ : cmp x y ≠ .lt) (h₂ : cmp y z ≠ .lt) : cmp x z ≠ .lt := by |
have := @TransCmp.le_trans _ cmp _ z y x
simp [cmp_eq_gt] at *; exact this h₂ h₁
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
#align_import data.list.cycle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7413128c3bcb3b0818e3e18720abc9ea3100fb49"
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
#align list.next_or List.nextOr
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
#align list.next_or_nil List.nextOr_nil
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
#align list.next_or_singleton List.nextOr_singleton
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
#align list.next_or_self_cons_cons List.nextOr_self_cons_cons
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
cases' xs with z zs
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
#align list.next_or_cons_of_ne List.nextOr_cons_of_ne
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
cases' ys with z zs
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
#align list.next_or_eq_next_or_of_mem_of_ne List.nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
cases' ys with z zs
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
#align list.mem_of_next_or_ne List.mem_of_nextOr_ne
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
#align list.next_or_concat List.nextOr_concat
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
cases' ys with z zs
· exact hd
rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_cons_self _ _))
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
#align list.next_or_mem List.nextOr_mem
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : List α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
nextOr l x (l.get ⟨0, length_pos_of_mem h⟩)
#align list.next List.next
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : ∀ l : List α, ∀ x ∈ l, α
| [], _, h => by simp at h
| [y], _, _ => y
| y :: z :: xs, x, h =>
if hx : x = y then getLast (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
else if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
#align list.prev List.prev
variable (l : List α) (x : α)
@[simp]
theorem next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : next [y] x h = y :=
rfl
#align list.next_singleton List.next_singleton
@[simp]
theorem prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : prev [y] x h = y :=
rfl
#align list.prev_singleton List.prev_singleton
theorem next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z := by rw [next, nextOr, if_pos hx]
#align list.next_cons_cons_eq' List.next_cons_cons_eq'
@[simp]
theorem next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) : next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
#align list.next_cons_cons_eq List.next_cons_cons_eq
theorem next_ne_head_ne_getLast (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
rw [next, next, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne]
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
exact ne_nil_of_mem (by assumption)
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
#align list.next_ne_head_ne_last List.next_ne_head_ne_getLast
theorem next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y := by
rw [next, nextOr_concat]
· rfl
· simp [hy, hx]
#align list.next_cons_concat List.next_cons_concat
theorem next_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : Nodup l) : next (y :: l) x h = y := by
rw [next, get, ← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, nextOr_concat]
subst hx
intro H
obtain ⟨⟨_ | k, hk⟩, hk'⟩ := get_of_mem H
· rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← get?_eq_get, dropLast_eq_take, get?_take, get?_zero, head?_cons,
Option.some_inj] at hk'
· exact hy (Eq.symm hk')
rw [length_cons, Nat.pred_succ]
exact length_pos_of_mem (by assumption)
suffices k + 1 = l.length by simp [this] at hk
cases' l with hd tl
· simp at hk
· rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hl
rw [length, Nat.succ_inj']
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq <| @hl ⟨k, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt <| by simpa using hk⟩
⟨tl.length, by simp⟩ ?_
rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← get?_eq_get, dropLast_eq_take, get?_take, get?, get?_eq_get, Option.some_inj] at hk'
· rw [hk']
simp only [getLast_eq_get, length_cons, ge_iff_le, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
nonpos_iff_eq_zero, add_eq_zero_iff, and_false, Nat.sub_zero, get_cons_succ]
simpa using hk
#align list.next_last_cons List.next_getLast_cons
theorem prev_getLast_cons' (y : α) (hxy : x ∈ y :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x hxy = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by cases l <;> simp [prev, hx]
#align list.prev_last_cons' List.prev_getLast_cons'
@[simp]
theorem prev_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ x :: l) :
prev (x :: l) x h = getLast (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_getLast_cons' l x x h rfl
#align list.prev_last_cons List.prev_getLast_cons
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
#align list.prev_cons_cons_eq' List.prev_cons_cons_eq'
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
#align list.prev_cons_cons_eq List.prev_cons_cons_eq
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y := by
cases l
· simp [prev, hy, hz]
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz]
#align list.prev_cons_cons_of_ne' List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne'
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: x :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
#align list.prev_cons_cons_of_ne List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne
theorem prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
cases l
· simp [hy, hz] at h
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz]
#align list.prev_ne_cons_cons List.prev_ne_cons_cons
theorem next_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.next x h ∈ l :=
nextOr_mem (get_mem _ _ _)
#align list.next_mem List.next_mem
theorem prev_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.prev x h ∈ l := by
cases' l with hd tl
· simp at h
induction' tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd
· simp
· by_cases hx : x = hd
· simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq]
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (getLast_mem _)
· rw [prev, dif_neg hx]
split_ifs with hm
· exact mem_cons_self _ _
· exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (hl _ _)
#align list.prev_mem List.prev_mem
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem next_get : ∀ (l : List α) (_h : Nodup l) (i : Fin l.length),
next l (l.get i) (get_mem _ _ _) = l.get ⟨(i + 1) % l.length,
Nat.mod_lt _ (i.1.zero_le.trans_lt i.2)⟩
| [], _, i => by simpa using i.2
| [_], _, _ => by simp
| x::y::l, _h, ⟨0, h0⟩ => by
have h₁ : get (x :: y :: l) { val := 0, isLt := h0 } = x := by simp
rw [next_cons_cons_eq' _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
simp
| x::y::l, hn, ⟨i+1, hi⟩ => by
have hx' : (x :: y :: l).get ⟨i+1, hi⟩ ≠ x := by
intro H
suffices (i + 1 : ℕ) = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hn
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hn ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ ⟨0, by simp⟩ ?_)
simpa using H
have hi' : i ≤ l.length := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
rcases hi'.eq_or_lt with (hi' | hi')
· subst hi'
rw [next_getLast_cons]
· simp [hi', get]
· rw [get_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _ _
· exact hx'
· simp [getLast_eq_get]
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [next_ne_head_ne_getLast _ _ _ _ _ hx']
· simp only [get_cons_succ]
rw [next_get (y::l), ← get_cons_succ (a := x)]
· congr
dsimp
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'))]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'), Nat.succ_eq_add_one, hi']
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [getLast_eq_get]
intro h
have := nodup_iff_injective_get.1 hn h
simp at this; simp [this] at hi'
· rw [get_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _ _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated next_get (since := "2023-01-27")]
theorem next_nthLe (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.length) :
next l (l.nthLe n hn) (nthLe_mem _ _ _) =
l.nthLe ((n + 1) % l.length) (Nat.mod_lt _ (n.zero_le.trans_lt hn)) :=
next_get l h ⟨n, hn⟩
#align list.next_nth_le List.next_nthLe
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem prev_nthLe (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.length) :
prev l (l.nthLe n hn) (nthLe_mem _ _ _) =
l.nthLe ((n + (l.length - 1)) % l.length) (Nat.mod_lt _ (n.zero_le.trans_lt hn)) := by
cases' l with x l
· simp at hn
induction' l with y l hl generalizing n x
· simp
· rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· simp [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, List.prev_cons_cons_eq, Nat.zero_eq, List.length,
List.nthLe, Nat.succ_add_sub_one, zero_add, getLast_eq_get,
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ l.length.lt_succ_self)]
· simp only [mem_cons, nodup_cons] at h
push_neg at h
simp only [List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ h.left.left.symm, Nat.zero_eq, List.length,
List.nthLe, add_comm, eq_self_iff_true, Nat.succ_add_sub_one, Nat.mod_self, zero_add,
List.get]
· rw [prev_ne_cons_cons]
· convert hl n.succ y h.of_cons (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hn) using 1
have : ∀ k hk, (y :: l).nthLe k hk = (x :: y :: l).nthLe (k + 1) (Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) := by
intros
simp [List.nthLe]
rw [this]
congr
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length]
simp only [length, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at hn
set k := l.length
rw [Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ _ k,
Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hn
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hn)
· intro H
suffices n.succ.succ = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_nthLe_inj] at h
refine h _ _ hn Nat.succ_pos' ?_
simpa using H
· intro H
suffices n.succ.succ = 1 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_nthLe_inj] at h
refine h _ _ hn (Nat.succ_lt_succ Nat.succ_pos') ?_
simpa using H
#align list.prev_nth_le List.prev_nthLe
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem pmap_next_eq_rotate_one (h : Nodup l) : (l.pmap l.next fun _ h => h) = l.rotate 1 := by
apply List.ext_nthLe
· simp
· intros
rw [nthLe_pmap, nthLe_rotate, next_nthLe _ h]
#align list.pmap_next_eq_rotate_one List.pmap_next_eq_rotate_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one (h : Nodup l) :
(l.pmap l.prev fun _ h => h) = l.rotate (l.length - 1) := by
apply List.ext_nthLe
· simp
· intro n hn hn'
rw [nthLe_rotate, nthLe_pmap, prev_nthLe _ h]
#align list.pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one List.pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 374 | 383 | theorem prev_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l (next l x hx) (next_mem _ _ _) = x := by |
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := nthLe_of_mem hx
simp only [next_nthLe, prev_nthLe, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
cases' l with hd tl
· simp at hx
· have : (n + 1 + length tl) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at hn
rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, this]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.exponential from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b67044ba53af18680e1dd246861d9584e968495d"
/-! # Ordinal exponential
In this file we define the power function and the logarithm function on ordinals. The two are
related by the lemma `Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x` for nontrivial inputs
`b`, `c`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion. -/
instance pow : Pow Ordinal Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if a = 0 then 1 - b else limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ IH => IH * a) fun b _ => bsup.{u, u} b⟩
-- Porting note: Ambiguous notations.
-- local infixr:0 "^" => @Pow.pow Ordinal Ordinal Ordinal.instPowOrdinalOrdinal
theorem opow_def (a b : Ordinal) :
a ^ b = if a = 0 then 1 - b else limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ IH => IH * a) fun b _ => bsup.{u, u} b :=
rfl
#align ordinal.opow_def Ordinal.opow_def
-- Porting note: `if_pos rfl` → `if_true`
theorem zero_opow' (a : Ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a := by simp only [opow_def, if_true]
#align ordinal.zero_opow' Ordinal.zero_opow'
@[simp]
theorem zero_opow {a : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a = 0 := by
rwa [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.zero_opow Ordinal.zero_opow
@[simp]
theorem opow_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· simp only [opow_def, if_pos h, sub_zero]
· simp only [opow_def, if_neg h, limitRecOn_zero]
#align ordinal.opow_zero Ordinal.opow_zero
@[simp]
theorem opow_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a :=
if h : a = 0 then by subst a; simp only [zero_opow (succ_ne_zero _), mul_zero]
else by simp only [opow_def, limitRecOn_succ, if_neg h]
#align ordinal.opow_succ Ordinal.opow_succ
theorem opow_limit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b = bsup.{u, u} b fun c _ => a ^ c := by
simp only [opow_def, if_neg a0]; rw [limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _ h]
#align ordinal.opow_limit Ordinal.opow_limit
theorem opow_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c := by rw [opow_limit a0 h, bsup_le_iff]
#align ordinal.opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.opow_le_of_limit
theorem lt_opow_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]; simp only [not_lt, opow_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
#align ordinal.lt_opow_of_limit Ordinal.lt_opow_of_limit
@[simp]
theorem opow_one (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 : Ordinal) = a := by
rw [← succ_zero, opow_succ]; simp only [opow_zero, one_mul]
#align ordinal.opow_one Ordinal.opow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_opow (a : Ordinal) : (1 : Ordinal) ^ a = 1 := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [opow_zero]
| H₂ _ ih =>
simp only [opow_succ, ih, mul_one]
| H₃ b l IH =>
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.one_ne_zero l]
exact ⟨fun H => by simpa only [opow_zero] using H 0 l.pos, fun H b' h => by rwa [IH _ h]⟩
#align ordinal.one_opow Ordinal.one_opow
theorem opow_pos {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b := by
have h0 : 0 < a ^ (0 : Ordinal) := by simp only [opow_zero, zero_lt_one]
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => exact h0
| H₂ b IH =>
rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_pos IH a0
| H₃ b l _ =>
exact (lt_opow_of_limit (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2 ⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩
#align ordinal.opow_pos Ordinal.opow_pos
theorem opow_ne_zero {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| opow_pos b <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
#align ordinal.opow_ne_zero Ordinal.opow_ne_zero
theorem opow_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : IsNormal (a ^ ·) :=
have a0 : 0 < a := zero_lt_one.trans h
⟨fun b => by simpa only [mul_one, opow_succ] using (mul_lt_mul_iff_left (opow_pos b a0)).2 h,
fun b l c => opow_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
#align ordinal.opow_is_normal Ordinal.opow_isNormal
theorem opow_lt_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).lt_iff
#align ordinal.opow_lt_opow_iff_right Ordinal.opow_lt_opow_iff_right
theorem opow_le_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).le_iff
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_iff_right Ordinal.opow_le_opow_iff_right
theorem opow_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).inj
#align ordinal.opow_right_inj Ordinal.opow_right_inj
theorem opow_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a ^ b) :=
(opow_isNormal a1).isLimit
#align ordinal.opow_is_limit Ordinal.opow_isLimit
theorem opow_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : IsLimit (a ^ b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (e | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | l')
· exact absurd e hb
· rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_isLimit (opow_pos _ l.pos) l
· exact opow_isLimit l.one_lt l'
#align ordinal.opow_is_limit_left Ordinal.opow_isLimit_left
theorem opow_le_opow_right {a b c : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ | h₁
· exact (opow_le_opow_iff_right h₁).2 h₂
· subst a
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
simp only [one_opow, le_refl]
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_right Ordinal.opow_le_opow_right
theorem opow_le_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (c : Ordinal) (ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c := by
by_cases a0 : a = 0
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· subst c
simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
· simp only [zero_opow c0, Ordinal.zero_le]
· induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
| H₂ c IH =>
simpa only [opow_succ] using mul_le_mul' IH ab
| H₃ c l IH =>
exact
(opow_le_of_limit a0 l).2 fun b' h =>
(IH _ h).trans (opow_le_opow_right ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0).trans_le ab) h.le)
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_left Ordinal.opow_le_opow_left
theorem left_le_opow (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (b1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
nth_rw 1 [← opow_one a]
cases' le_or_gt a 1 with a1 a1
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le a1 with a0 | a1
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at a0
rw [a0, zero_opow Ordinal.one_ne_zero]
exact Ordinal.zero_le _
rw [a1, one_opow, one_opow]
rwa [opow_le_opow_iff_right a1, one_le_iff_pos]
#align ordinal.left_le_opow Ordinal.left_le_opow
theorem right_le_opow {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(opow_isNormal a1).self_le _
#align ordinal.right_le_opow Ordinal.right_le_opow
theorem opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ {a b c : Ordinal} (ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c := by
rw [opow_succ, opow_succ]
exact
(mul_le_mul_right' (opow_le_opow_left c ab.le) a).trans_lt
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (opow_pos c ((Ordinal.zero_le a).trans_lt ab)))
#align ordinal.opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ Ordinal.opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ
theorem opow_add (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | a0)
· rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | c0)
· simp
have : b + c ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0).trans_le (le_add_left _ _)).ne'
simp only [zero_opow c0, zero_opow this, mul_zero]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with (rfl | a1)
· simp only [one_opow, mul_one]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp
| H₂ c IH =>
rw [add_succ, opow_succ, IH, opow_succ, mul_assoc]
| H₃ c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((opow_isNormal a1).trans (add_isNormal b)).limit_le l).trans ?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [IH]
exact
(((mul_isNormal <| opow_pos b (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(opow_isNormal a1)).limit_le
l).symm
#align ordinal.opow_add Ordinal.opow_add
theorem opow_one_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 + b) = a * a ^ b := by rw [opow_add, opow_one]
#align ordinal.opow_one_add Ordinal.opow_one_add
theorem opow_dvd_opow (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
⟨a ^ (c - b), by rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]⟩
#align ordinal.opow_dvd_opow Ordinal.opow_dvd_opow
theorem opow_dvd_opow_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
not_le_of_lt ((opow_lt_opow_iff_right a1).2 hn) <|
le_of_dvd (opow_ne_zero _ <| one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 <| a1.le) h,
opow_dvd_opow _⟩
#align ordinal.opow_dvd_opow_iff Ordinal.opow_dvd_opow_iff
theorem opow_mul (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp only [b0, zero_mul, opow_zero, one_opow]
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· simp only [c0, mul_zero, opow_zero]
simp only [zero_opow b0, zero_opow c0, zero_opow (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)]
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1
· subst a1
simp only [one_opow]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, opow_zero]
| H₂ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, opow_add, IH, opow_succ]
| H₃ c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((opow_isNormal a1).trans (mul_isNormal (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le
l).trans
?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [IH]
exact (opow_le_of_limit (opow_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm
#align ordinal.opow_mul Ordinal.opow_mul
/-! ### Ordinal logarithm -/
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation `x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and
`w < b ^ u`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: Unknown attribute.
def log (b : Ordinal) (x : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if _h : 1 < b then pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) else 0
#align ordinal.log Ordinal.log
/-- The set in the definition of `log` is nonempty. -/
theorem log_nonempty {b x : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) : { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, succ_le_iff.1 (right_le_opow _ h)⟩
#align ordinal.log_nonempty Ordinal.log_nonempty
theorem log_def {b : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) :
log b x = pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) := by simp only [log, dif_pos h]
#align ordinal.log_def Ordinal.log_def
theorem log_of_not_one_lt_left {b : Ordinal} (h : ¬1 < b) (x : Ordinal) : log b x = 0 := by
simp only [log, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.log_of_not_one_lt_left Ordinal.log_of_not_one_lt_left
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ 1) : ∀ x, log b x = 0 :=
log_of_not_one_lt_left h.not_lt
#align ordinal.log_of_left_le_one Ordinal.log_of_left_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_left : ∀ b, log 0 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one zero_le_one
#align ordinal.log_zero_left Ordinal.log_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 :=
if b1 : 1 < b then by
rw [log_def b1, ← Ordinal.le_zero, pred_le]
apply csInf_le'
dsimp
rw [succ_zero, opow_one]
exact zero_lt_one.trans b1
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left b1]
#align ordinal.log_zero_right Ordinal.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ b, log 1 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
#align ordinal.log_one_left Ordinal.log_one_left
theorem succ_log_def {b x : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
succ (log b x) = sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o } := by
let t := sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }
have : x < (b^t) := csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with (h | h | h)
· refine ((one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx).not_lt ?_).elim
simpa only [h, opow_zero] using this
· rw [show log b x = pred t from log_def hb x, succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h]
· rcases (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact h₁.not_le.elim ((le_csInf_iff'' (log_nonempty hb)).1 le_rfl a h₂)
#align ordinal.succ_log_def Ordinal.succ_log_def
theorem lt_opow_succ_log_self {b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) :
x < b ^ succ (log b x) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· apply opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)
· rw [succ_log_def hb hx]
exact csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
#align ordinal.lt_opow_succ_log_self Ordinal.lt_opow_succ_log_self
theorem opow_log_le_self (b : Ordinal) {x : Ordinal} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | b0)
· rw [zero_opow']
exact (sub_le_self _ _).trans (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx)
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with (hb | rfl)
· refine le_of_not_lt fun h => (lt_succ (log b x)).not_le ?_
have := @csInf_le' _ _ { o | x < b ^ o } _ h
rwa [← succ_log_def hb hx] at this
· rwa [one_opow, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.opow_log_le_self Ordinal.opow_log_le_self
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection. -/
theorem opow_le_iff_le_log {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
(lt_opow_succ_log_self hb x).not_le <|
((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 (succ_le_of_lt hn)).trans h,
fun h => ((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 h).trans (opow_log_le_self b hx)⟩
#align ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log
theorem lt_opow_iff_log_lt {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c ↔ log b x < c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx)
#align ordinal.lt_opow_iff_log_lt Ordinal.lt_opow_iff_log_lt
theorem log_pos {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o ≠ 0) (hbo : b ≤ o) : 0 < log b o := by
rwa [← succ_le_iff, succ_zero, ← opow_le_iff_le_log hb ho, opow_one]
#align ordinal.log_pos Ordinal.log_pos
theorem log_eq_zero {b o : Ordinal} (hbo : o < b) : log b o = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne o 0 with (rfl | ho)
· exact log_zero_right b
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rcases le_one_iff.1 hb with (rfl | rfl)
· exact log_zero_left o
· exact log_one_left o
· rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← lt_succ_iff, succ_zero, ← lt_opow_iff_log_lt hb ho, opow_one]
#align ordinal.log_eq_zero Ordinal.log_eq_zero
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right (b : Ordinal) {x y : Ordinal} (xy : x ≤ y) : log b x ≤ log b y :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp only [hx, log_zero_right, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
if hb : 1 < b then
(opow_le_iff_le_log hb (lt_of_lt_of_le (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) xy).ne').1 <|
(opow_log_le_self _ hx).trans xy
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left hb, Ordinal.zero_le]
#align ordinal.log_mono_right Ordinal.log_mono_right
theorem log_le_self (b x : Ordinal) : log b x ≤ x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp only [hx, log_zero_right, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
if hb : 1 < b then (right_le_opow _ hb).trans (opow_log_le_self b hx)
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left hb, Ordinal.zero_le]
#align ordinal.log_le_self Ordinal.log_le_self
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 1 = 0 :=
if hb : 1 < b then log_eq_zero hb else log_of_not_one_lt_left hb 1
#align ordinal.log_one_right Ordinal.log_one_right
theorem mod_opow_log_lt_self (b : Ordinal) {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : o % (b ^ log b o) < o := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simpa using Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
· exact (mod_lt _ <| opow_ne_zero _ hb).trans_le (opow_log_le_self _ ho)
#align ordinal.mod_opow_log_lt_self Ordinal.mod_opow_log_lt_self
theorem log_mod_opow_log_lt_log_self {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o ≠ 0) (hbo : b ≤ o) :
log b (o % (b ^ log b o)) < log b o := by
rcases eq_or_ne (o % (b ^ log b o)) 0 with h | h
· rw [h, log_zero_right]
apply log_pos hb ho hbo
· rw [← succ_le_iff, succ_log_def hb h]
apply csInf_le'
apply mod_lt
rw [← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)
#align ordinal.log_mod_opow_log_lt_log_self Ordinal.log_mod_opow_log_lt_log_self
theorem opow_mul_add_pos {b v : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) (u : Ordinal) (hv : v ≠ 0) (w : Ordinal) :
0 < b ^ u * v + w :=
(opow_pos u <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb).trans_le <|
(le_mul_left _ <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hv).trans <| le_add_right _ _
#align ordinal.opow_mul_add_pos Ordinal.opow_mul_add_pos
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ {b u w : Ordinal} (v : Ordinal) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ u * succ v := by rwa [mul_succ, add_lt_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ Ordinal.opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ {b u v w : Ordinal} (hvb : v < b) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ succ u := by
convert (opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ v hw).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt hvb) _)
using 1
exact opow_succ b u
#align ordinal.opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ Ordinal.opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ
theorem log_opow_mul_add {b u v w : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hv : v ≠ 0) (hvb : v < b)
(hw : w < b ^ u) : log b (b ^ u * v + w) = u := by
have hne' := (opow_mul_add_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' u hv w).ne'
by_contra! hne
cases' lt_or_gt_of_ne hne with h h
· rw [← lt_opow_iff_log_lt hb hne'] at h
exact h.not_le ((le_mul_left _ (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hv)).trans (le_add_right _ _))
· conv at h => change u < log b (b ^ u * v + w)
rw [← succ_le_iff, ← opow_le_iff_le_log hb hne'] at h
exact (not_lt_of_le h) (opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ hvb hw)
#align ordinal.log_opow_mul_add Ordinal.log_opow_mul_add
theorem log_opow {b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) : log b (b ^ x) = x := by
convert log_opow_mul_add hb zero_ne_one.symm hb (opow_pos x (zero_lt_one.trans hb))
using 1
rw [add_zero, mul_one]
#align ordinal.log_opow Ordinal.log_opow
theorem div_opow_log_pos (b : Ordinal) {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : 0 < o / (b ^ log b o) := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with (rfl | hb)
· simpa using Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
· rw [div_pos (opow_ne_zero _ hb.ne')]
exact opow_log_le_self b ho
#align ordinal.div_opow_log_pos Ordinal.div_opow_log_pos
theorem div_opow_log_lt {b : Ordinal} (o : Ordinal) (hb : 1 < b) : o / (b ^ log b o) < b := by
rw [div_lt (opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)).ne', ← opow_succ]
exact lt_opow_succ_log_self hb o
#align ordinal.div_opow_log_lt Ordinal.div_opow_log_lt
theorem add_log_le_log_mul {x y : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
log b x + log b y ≤ log b (x * y) := by
by_cases hb : 1 < b
· rw [← opow_le_iff_le_log hb (mul_ne_zero hx hy), opow_add]
exact mul_le_mul' (opow_log_le_self b hx) (opow_log_le_self b hy)
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left hb, zero_add, le_refl]
#align ordinal.add_log_le_log_mul Ordinal.add_log_le_log_mul
/-! ### Interaction with `Nat.cast` -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_opow (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑(m ^ n : ℕ) = (m : Ordinal) ^ (n : Ordinal)
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, natCast_mul, natCast_opow m n, Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, opow_succ]
#align ordinal.nat_cast_opow Ordinal.natCast_opow
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_opow := natCast_opow
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Exponential.lean | 465 | 471 | theorem sup_opow_nat {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : (sup fun n : ℕ => o ^ (n : Ordinal)) = o ^ ω := by |
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 ho) with (ho₁ | rfl)
· exact (opow_isNormal ho₁).apply_omega
· rw [one_opow]
refine le_antisymm (sup_le fun n => by rw [one_opow]) ?_
convert le_sup (fun n : ℕ => 1 ^ (n : Ordinal)) 0
rw [Nat.cast_zero, opow_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
#align_import algebra.big_operators.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Big operators
In this file we define products and sums indexed by finite sets (specifically, `Finset`).
## Notation
We introduce the following notation.
Let `s` be a `Finset α`, and `f : α → β` a function.
* `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f` (assuming `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f` (assuming `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
* `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
## Implementation Notes
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists AddCommMonoidWithOne
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
variable {ι κ α β γ : Type*}
open Fin Function
namespace Finset
/-- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is the product of `f x`
as `x` ranges over the elements of the finite set `s`.
-/
@[to_additive "`∑ x ∈ s, f x` is the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements
of the finite set `s`."]
protected def prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : β :=
(s.1.map f).prod
#align finset.prod Finset.prod
#align finset.sum Finset.sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset α) (hs : s.Nodup) (f : α → β) :
(⟨s, hs⟩ : Finset α).prod f = (s.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_mk Finset.prod_mk
#align finset.sum_mk Finset.sum_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_val [CommMonoid α] (s : Finset α) : s.1.prod = s.prod id := by
rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_val Finset.prod_val
#align finset.sum_val Finset.sum_val
end Finset
library_note "operator precedence of big operators"/--
There is no established mathematical convention
for the operator precedence of big operators like `∏` and `∑`.
We will have to make a choice.
Online discussions, such as https://math.stackexchange.com/q/185538/30839
seem to suggest that `∏` and `∑` should have the same precedence,
and that this should be somewhere between `*` and `+`.
The latter have precedence levels `70` and `65` respectively,
and we therefore choose the level `67`.
In practice, this means that parentheses should be placed as follows:
```lean
∑ k ∈ K, (a k + b k) = ∑ k ∈ K, a k + ∑ k ∈ K, b k →
∏ k ∈ K, a k * b k = (∏ k ∈ K, a k) * (∏ k ∈ K, b k)
```
(Example taken from page 490 of Knuth's *Concrete Mathematics*.)
-/
namespace BigOperators
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder Lean Meta
-- TODO: contribute this modification back to `extBinder`
/-- A `bigOpBinder` is like an `extBinder` and has the form `x`, `x : ty`, or `x pred`
where `pred` is a `binderPred` like `< 2`.
Unlike `extBinder`, `x` is a term. -/
syntax bigOpBinder := term:max ((" : " term) <|> binderPred)?
/-- A BigOperator binder in parentheses -/
syntax bigOpBinderParenthesized := " (" bigOpBinder ")"
/-- A list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinderCollection := bigOpBinderParenthesized+
/-- A single (unparenthesized) binder, or a list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinders := bigOpBinderCollection <|> (ppSpace bigOpBinder)
/-- Collects additional binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinder`.
Note: this is not extensible at the moment, unlike the usual `bigOpBinder` expansions. -/
def processBigOpBinder (processed : (Array (Term × Term)))
(binder : TSyntax ``bigOpBinder) : MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
set_option hygiene false in
withRef binder do
match binder with
| `(bigOpBinder| $x:term) =>
match x with
| `(($a + $b = $n)) => -- Maybe this is too cute.
return processed |>.push (← `(⟨$a, $b⟩), ← `(Finset.Nat.antidiagonal $n))
| _ => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``(Finset.univ))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x : $t) => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``((Finset.univ : Finset $t)))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ∈ $s) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(finset% $s))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x < $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iio $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≤ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iic $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x > $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ioi $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≥ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ici $n))
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collects the binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinders`. -/
def processBigOpBinders (binders : TSyntax ``bigOpBinders) :
MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
match binders with
| `(bigOpBinders| $b:bigOpBinder) => processBigOpBinder #[] b
| `(bigOpBinders| $[($bs:bigOpBinder)]*) => bs.foldlM processBigOpBinder #[]
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collect the binderIdents into a `⟨...⟩` expression. -/
def bigOpBindersPattern (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
let ts := processed.map Prod.fst
if ts.size == 1 then
return ts[0]!
else
`(⟨$ts,*⟩)
/-- Collect the terms into a product of sets. -/
def bigOpBindersProd (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
if processed.isEmpty then
`((Finset.univ : Finset Unit))
else if processed.size == 1 then
return processed[0]!.2
else
processed.foldrM (fun s p => `(SProd.sprod $(s.2) $p)) processed.back.2
(start := processed.size - 1)
/--
- `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∑ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∑ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.sum (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∑ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∑" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigsum) "∑ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
/--
- `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∏ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∏ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.prod (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∏ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∏" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigprod) "∏ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsum)
| `(∑ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.sum (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.sum $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
macro_rules (kind := bigprod)
| `(∏ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.prod (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.prod $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
/-- (Deprecated, use `∑ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∑ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigsumin) "∑ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsumin)
| `(∑ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∑ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
/-- (Deprecated, use `∏ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∏ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigprodin) "∏ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigprodin)
| `(∏ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∏ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
open Lean Meta Parser.Term PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.prod`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the product is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.prod] def delabFinsetProd : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∏ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∏ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.sum`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the sum is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.sum] def delabFinsetSum : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∑ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∑ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
end BigOperators
namespace Finset
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_multiset_prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = (s.1.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod
#align finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_map_val [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.1.map f).prod = ∏ a ∈ s, f a :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_map_val Finset.prod_map_val
#align finset.sum_map_val Finset.sum_map_val
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_fold [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = s.fold ((· * ·) : β → β → β) 1 f :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_fold Finset.prod_eq_fold
#align finset.sum_eq_fold Finset.sum_eq_fold
@[simp]
theorem sum_multiset_singleton (s : Finset α) : (s.sum fun x => {x}) = s.val := by
simp only [sum_eq_multiset_sum, Multiset.sum_map_singleton]
#align finset.sum_multiset_singleton Finset.sum_multiset_singleton
end Finset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_prod [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {G : Type*} [FunLike G β γ] [MonoidHomClass G β γ]
(g : G) (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : g (∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g (f x) := by
simp only [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, map_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align map_prod map_prod
#align map_sum map_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, ⇑(f x) :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.coeFn β γ) _ _
#align monoid_hom.coe_finset_prod MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_finset_sum AddMonoidHom.coe_finset_sum
/-- See also `Finset.prod_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"See also `Finset.sum_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ`"]
theorem MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α)
(b : β) : (∏ x ∈ s, f x) b = ∏ x ∈ s, f x b :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.eval b) _ _
#align monoid_hom.finset_prod_apply MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.finset_sum_apply AddMonoidHom.finset_sum_apply
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_empty : ∏ x ∈ ∅, f x = 1 :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_empty Finset.prod_empty
#align finset.sum_empty Finset.sum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_of_empty Finset.prod_of_empty
#align finset.sum_of_empty Finset.sum_of_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (h : a ∉ s) : ∏ x ∈ cons a s h, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.prod_cons Finset.prod_cons
#align finset.sum_cons Finset.sum_cons
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_insert [DecidableEq α] : a ∉ s → ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_insert
#align finset.prod_insert Finset.prod_insert
#align finset.sum_insert Finset.sum_insert
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
by_cases hm : a ∈ s
· simp_rw [insert_eq_of_mem hm]
· rw [prod_insert hm, h hm, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem Finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem
#align finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_one [DecidableEq α] (h : f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
#align finset.prod_insert_one Finset.prod_insert_one
#align finset.sum_insert_zero Finset.sum_insert_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_insert_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) {f : α → M} :
(∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x) / f a = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ∏ x ∈ singleton a, f x = f a :=
Eq.trans fold_singleton <| mul_one _
#align finset.prod_singleton Finset.prod_singleton
#align finset.sum_singleton Finset.sum_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pair [DecidableEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) :
(∏ x ∈ ({a, b} : Finset α), f x) = f a * f b := by
rw [prod_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_pair Finset.prod_pair
#align finset.sum_pair Finset.sum_pair
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const_one : (∏ _x ∈ s, (1 : β)) = 1 := by
simp only [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_const', Multiset.prod_replicate, one_pow]
#align finset.prod_const_one Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.sum_const_zero Finset.sum_const_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_image [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, g x = g y → x = y) → ∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (g x) :=
fold_image
#align finset.prod_image Finset.prod_image
#align finset.sum_image Finset.sum_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_map (s : Finset α) (e : α ↪ γ) (f : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.map e, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (e x) := by
rw [Finset.prod, Finset.map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_map Finset.prod_map
#align finset.sum_map Finset.sum_map
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_attach (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s.attach, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
classical rw [← prod_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn, attach_image_val]
#align finset.prod_attach Finset.prod_attach
#align finset.sum_attach Finset.sum_attach
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem prod_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) : (∀ x ∈ s₂, f x = g x) → s₁.prod f = s₂.prod g := by
rw [h]; exact fold_congr
#align finset.prod_congr Finset.prod_congr
#align finset.sum_congr Finset.sum_congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_one {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ _x ∈ s, 1 := Finset.prod_congr rfl h
_ = 1 := Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_one Finset.prod_eq_one
#align finset.sum_eq_zero Finset.sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjUnion (h) :
∏ x ∈ s₁.disjUnion s₂ h, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjUnion h)
rw [one_mul]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_union Finset.prod_disjUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_union Finset.sum_disjUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjiUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Finset α) (h) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjiUnion t h, f x = ∏ i ∈ s, ∏ x ∈ t i, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjiUnion h)
dsimp [Finset.prod, Multiset.prod, Multiset.fold, Finset.disjUnion, Finset.fold]
congr
exact prod_const_one.symm
#align finset.prod_disj_Union Finset.prod_disjiUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_Union Finset.sum_disjiUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union_inter [DecidableEq α] :
(∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
fold_union_inter
#align finset.prod_union_inter Finset.prod_union_inter
#align finset.sum_union_inter Finset.sum_union_inter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union [DecidableEq α] (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp h]; exact (mul_one _).symm
#align finset.prod_union Finset.prod_union
#align finset.sum_union Finset.sum_union
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
(s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
have := Classical.decEq α
rw [← prod_union (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s s p), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
#align finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
#align finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not Finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not
section ToList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_to_list (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.toList.map f).prod = s.prod f := by
rw [Finset.prod, ← Multiset.prod_coe, ← Multiset.map_coe, Finset.coe_toList]
#align finset.prod_to_list Finset.prod_to_list
#align finset.sum_to_list Finset.sum_to_list
end ToList
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (prod_map s σ.toEmbedding f).symm
exact (map_perm hs).symm
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp Equiv.Perm.prod_comp
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp Equiv.Perm.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp' (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x) x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x (σ.symm x) := by
convert σ.prod_comp s (fun x => f x (σ.symm x)) hs
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp' Equiv.Perm.prod_comp'
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp' Equiv.Perm.sum_comp'
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_insert [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (insert a s).powerset, f t =
(∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) * ∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f (insert a t) := by
rw [powerset_insert, prod_union, prod_image]
· exact insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn.mono fun t ht ↦ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 ht) ha
· aesop (add simp [disjoint_left, insert_subset_iff])
#align finset.prod_powerset_insert Finset.prod_powerset_insert
#align finset.sum_powerset_insert Finset.sum_powerset_insert
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_cons (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (s.cons a ha).powerset, f t = (∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) *
∏ t ∈ s.powerset.attach, f (cons a t $ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 t.2) ha) := by
classical
simp_rw [cons_eq_insert]
rw [prod_powerset_insert ha, prod_attach _ fun t ↦ f (insert a t)]
/-- A product over `powerset s` is equal to the double product over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over `powerset s` is equal to the double sum over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`"]
lemma prod_powerset (s : Finset α) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ powerset s, f t = ∏ j ∈ range (card s + 1), ∏ t ∈ powersetCard j s, f t := by
rw [powerset_card_disjiUnion, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_powerset Finset.prod_powerset
#align finset.sum_powerset Finset.sum_powerset
end CommMonoid
end Finset
section
open Finset
variable [Fintype α] [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompl.prod_mul_prod {s t : Finset α} (h : IsCompl s t) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ t, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(Finset.prod_disjUnion h.disjoint).symm.trans <| by
classical rw [Finset.disjUnion_eq_union, ← Finset.sup_eq_union, h.sup_eq_top]; rfl
#align is_compl.prod_mul_prod IsCompl.prod_mul_prod
#align is_compl.sum_add_sum IsCompl.sum_add_sum
end
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
/-- Multiplying the products of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole product.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype`. -/
@[to_additive "Adding the sums of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole sum.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype`. "]
theorem prod_mul_prod_compl [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
IsCompl.prod_mul_prod isCompl_compl f
#align finset.prod_mul_prod_compl Finset.prod_mul_prod_compl
#align finset.sum_add_sum_compl Finset.sum_add_sum_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_compl_mul_prod [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i) * ∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(@isCompl_compl _ s _).symm.prod_mul_prod f
#align finset.prod_compl_mul_prod Finset.prod_compl_mul_prod
#align finset.sum_compl_add_sum Finset.sum_compl_add_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
(∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_of_subset h]
#align finset.prod_sdiff Finset.prod_sdiff
#align finset.sum_sdiff Finset.sum_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset_one_on_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, g x = 1)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f x = g x) : ∏ i ∈ s₁, f i = ∏ i ∈ s₂, g i := by
rw [← prod_sdiff h, prod_eq_one hg, one_mul]
exact prod_congr rfl hfg
#align finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
#align finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff Finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ → f x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
prod_subset_one_on_sdiff h (by simpa) fun _ _ => rfl
#align finset.prod_subset Finset.prod_subset
#align finset.sum_subset Finset.sum_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_disj_sum (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : Sum α γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, f x = (∏ x ∈ s, f (Sum.inl x)) * ∏ x ∈ t, f (Sum.inr x) := by
rw [← map_inl_disjUnion_map_inr, prod_disjUnion, prod_map, prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_sum Finset.prod_disj_sum
#align finset.sum_disj_sum Finset.sum_disj_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sum_elim (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : α → β) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, Sum.elim f g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by simp
#align finset.prod_sum_elim Finset.prod_sum_elim
#align finset.sum_sum_elim Finset.sum_sum_elim
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_biUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α}
(hs : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) : ∏ x ∈ s.biUnion t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ i ∈ t x, f i := by
rw [← disjiUnion_eq_biUnion _ _ hs, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_bUnion Finset.prod_biUnion
#align finset.sum_bUnion Finset.sum_biUnion
/-- Product over a sigma type equals the product of fiberwise products. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.prod_sigma'`. -/
@[to_additive "Sum over a sigma type equals the sum of fiberwise sums. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.sum_sigma'`"]
theorem prod_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : Sigma σ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x = ∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f ⟨a, s⟩ := by
simp_rw [← disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk, prod_disjiUnion, prod_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
#align finset.prod_sigma Finset.prod_sigma
#align finset.sum_sigma Finset.sum_sigma
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sigma' {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : ∀ a, σ a → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f a s) = ∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x.1 x.2 :=
Eq.symm <| prod_sigma s t fun x => f x.1 x.2
#align finset.prod_sigma' Finset.prod_sigma'
#align finset.sum_sigma' Finset.sum_sigma'
section bij
variable {ι κ α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α}
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the product, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the sum, rather than being a non-dependent function."]
theorem prod_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
congr_arg Multiset.prod (Multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup f g s.2 t.2 i hi i_inj i_surj h)
#align finset.prod_bij Finset.prod_bij
#align finset.sum_bij Finset.sum_bij
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the products, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather than
as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the sums, rather than being non-dependent functions."]
theorem prod_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, ι) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
refine prod_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩) h
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
#align finset.prod_bij' Finset.prod_bij'
#align finset.sum_bij' Finset.sum_bij'
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the sum."]
lemma prod_nbij (i : ι → κ) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set ι).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set ι).SurjOn i t) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj) h
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the products.
The difference with `Finset.prod_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the products, rather than on the entire types.
-/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the sums.
The difference with `Finset.sum_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the sums, rather than on the entire types."]
lemma prod_nbij' (i : ι → κ) (j : κ → ι) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv h
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_equiv (e : ι ≃ κ) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) (hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := by refine prod_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hfg <;> simp [hst]
#align finset.equiv.prod_comp_finset Finset.prod_equiv
#align finset.equiv.sum_comp_finset Finset.sum_equiv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_bijective (e : ι → κ) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t)
(hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := prod_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst hfg
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_injOn (e : ι → κ) (he : Set.InjOn e s) (hest : Set.MapsTo e s t)
(h' : ∀ i ∈ t, i ∉ e '' s → g i = 1) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ j ∈ t, g j := by
classical
exact (prod_nbij e (fun a ↦ mem_image_of_mem e) he (by simp [Set.surjOn_image]) h).trans <|
prod_subset (image_subset_iff.2 hest) <| by simpa using h'
variable [DecidableEq κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f (g i) :=
prod_congr rfl fun j _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hi).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to h]
#align finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to
#align finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x ↦ g x = y, f (g x) :=
prod_congr rfl fun y _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hx).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to h _
variable [Fintype κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
#align finset.prod_fiberwise Finset.prod_fiberwise
#align finset.sum_fiberwise Finset.sum_fiberwise
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise' (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
end bij
/-- Taking a product over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the product over `Fintype.piFinset t`.
`univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`, but differ
in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`. -/
@[to_additive "Taking a sum over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the sum over
`Fintype.piFinset t`. `univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`,
but differ in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`."]
lemma prod_univ_pi [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {κ : ι → Type*} (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i))
(f : (∀ i ∈ (univ : Finset ι), κ i) → β) :
∏ x ∈ univ.pi t, f x = ∏ x ∈ Fintype.piFinset t, f fun a _ ↦ x a := by
apply prod_nbij' (fun x i ↦ x i $ mem_univ _) (fun x i _ ↦ x i) <;> simp
#align finset.prod_univ_pi Finset.prod_univ_pi
#align finset.sum_univ_pi Finset.sum_univ_pi
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_diag [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α × α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s.diag, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f (i, i) := by
apply prod_nbij' Prod.fst (fun i ↦ (i, i)) <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (c, a) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.1, p.2))
apply prod_equiv (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product Finset.prod_finset_product
#align finset.sum_finset_product Finset.sum_finset_product
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product' (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f c a :=
prod_finset_product r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product' Finset.prod_finset_product'
#align finset.sum_finset_product' Finset.sum_finset_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α × γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (a, c) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.2, p.1))
apply prod_equiv ((Equiv.prodComm _ _).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm) <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right Finset.prod_finset_product_right
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right Finset.sum_finset_product_right
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right' (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α → γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f a c :=
prod_finset_product_right r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right' Finset.prod_finset_product_right'
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right' Finset.sum_finset_product_right'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_image' [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} (h : γ → β)
(eq : ∀ c ∈ s, f (g c) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = g c, h x) :
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, h x :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.image g, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = x, h x :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _x hx =>
let ⟨c, hcs, hc⟩ := mem_image.1 hx
hc ▸ eq c hcs
_ = ∏ x ∈ s, h x := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _x => mem_image_of_mem g) _
#align finset.prod_image' Finset.prod_image'
#align finset.sum_image' Finset.sum_image'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mul_distrib : ∏ x ∈ s, f x * g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]; rfl) fold_op_distrib
#align finset.prod_mul_distrib Finset.prod_mul_distrib
#align finset.sum_add_distrib Finset.sum_add_distrib
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_comm (f g h i : α → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, f a * g a) * ∏ a ∈ s, h a * i a = (∏ a ∈ s, f a * h a) * ∏ a ∈ s, g a * i a := by
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_mul_mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product (s ×ˢ t) s (fun _a => t) fun _p => mem_product
#align finset.prod_product Finset.prod_product
#align finset.sum_product Finset.sum_product
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product`"]
theorem prod_product' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y :=
prod_product
#align finset.prod_product' Finset.prod_product'
#align finset.sum_product' Finset.sum_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product_right {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product_right (s ×ˢ t) t (fun _a => s) fun _p => mem_product.trans and_comm
#align finset.prod_product_right Finset.prod_product_right
#align finset.sum_product_right Finset.sum_product_right
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product_right`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product_right`"]
theorem prod_product_right' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_product_right
#align finset.prod_product_right' Finset.prod_product_right'
#align finset.sum_product_right' Finset.sum_product_right'
/-- Generalization of `Finset.prod_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on the outer
variable. -/
@[to_additive "Generalization of `Finset.sum_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on
the outer variable."]
theorem prod_comm' {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α} {t' : Finset α} {s' : α → Finset γ}
(h : ∀ x y, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t x ↔ x ∈ s' y ∧ y ∈ t') {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t x, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t', ∏ x ∈ s' y, f x y := by
classical
have : ∀ z : γ × α, (z ∈ s.biUnion fun x => (t x).map <| Function.Embedding.sectr x _) ↔
z.1 ∈ s ∧ z.2 ∈ t z.1 := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_map, Function.Embedding.sectr_apply, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right, ← and_assoc]
exact
(prod_finset_product' _ _ _ this).symm.trans
((prod_finset_product_right' _ _ _) fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (this _).trans ((h x y).trans and_comm))
#align finset.prod_comm' Finset.prod_comm'
#align finset.sum_comm' Finset.sum_comm'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_comm {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_comm' fun _ _ => Iff.rfl
#align finset.prod_comm Finset.prod_comm
#align finset.sum_comm Finset.sum_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel [CommMonoid γ] {r : β → γ → Prop} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Finset α}
(h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀ a b c, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (∏ x ∈ s, f x) (∏ x ∈ s, g x) := by
delta Finset.prod
apply Multiset.prod_hom_rel <;> assumption
#align finset.prod_hom_rel Finset.prod_hom_rel
#align finset.sum_hom_rel Finset.sum_hom_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_of_ne {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 → p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
(prod_subset (filter_subset _ _)) fun x => by
classical
rw [not_imp_comm, mem_filter]
exact fun h₁ h₂ => ⟨h₁, by simpa using hp _ h₁ h₂⟩
#align finset.prod_filter_of_ne Finset.prod_filter_of_ne
#align finset.sum_filter_of_ne Finset.sum_filter_of_ne
-- If we use `[DecidableEq β]` here, some rewrites fail because they find a wrong `Decidable`
-- instance first; `{∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)}` doesn't work with `rw ← prod_filter_ne_one`
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_ne_one (s : Finset α) [∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)] :
∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_filter_of_ne fun _ _ => id
#align finset.prod_filter_ne_one Finset.prod_filter_ne_one
#align finset.sum_filter_ne_zero Finset.sum_filter_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α → β) :
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 :=
calc
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s.filter p, if p a then f a else 1 :=
prod_congr rfl fun a h => by rw [if_pos]; simpa using (mem_filter.1 h).2
_ = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 := by
{ refine prod_subset (filter_subset _ s) fun x hs h => ?_
rw [mem_filter, not_and] at h
exact if_neg (by simpa using h hs) }
#align finset.prod_filter Finset.prod_filter
#align finset.sum_filter Finset.sum_filter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h : a ∈ s)
(h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ {a}, f x := by
{ refine (prod_subset ?_ ?_).symm
· intro _ H
rwa [mem_singleton.1 H]
· simpa only [mem_singleton] }
_ = f a := prod_singleton _ _
#align finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1)
(h₁ : a ∉ s → f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
by_cases (prod_eq_single_of_mem a · h₀) fun this =>
(prod_congr rfl fun b hb => h₀ b hb <| by rintro rfl; exact this hb).trans <|
prod_const_one.trans (h₁ this).symm
#align finset.prod_eq_single Finset.prod_eq_single
#align finset.sum_eq_single Finset.sum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_left [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₂, a ∉ s₁ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₁, f a :=
Eq.symm <|
prod_subset subset_union_left fun _a ha ha' ↦ hs _ ((mem_union.1 ha).resolve_left ha') ha'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_right [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₁, a ∉ s₂ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₂, f a := by rw [union_comm, prod_union_eq_left hs]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s)
(hn : a ≠ b) (h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; let s' := ({a, b} : Finset α)
have hu : s' ⊆ s := by
refine insert_subset_iff.mpr ?_
apply And.intro ha
apply singleton_subset_iff.mpr hb
have hf : ∀ c ∈ s, c ∉ s' → f c = 1 := by
intro c hc hcs
apply h₀ c hc
apply not_or.mp
intro hab
apply hcs
rw [mem_insert, mem_singleton]
exact hab
rw [← prod_subset hu hf]
exact Finset.prod_pair hn
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (hn : a ≠ b)
(h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) (ha : a ∉ s → f a = 1) (hb : b ∉ s → f b = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; by_cases h₁ : a ∈ s <;> by_cases h₂ : b ∈ s
· exact prod_eq_mul_of_mem a b h₁ h₂ hn h₀
· rw [hb h₂, mul_one]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem a h₁
exact fun c hc hca => h₀ c hc ⟨hca, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩
· rw [ha h₁, one_mul]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem b h₂
exact fun c hc hcb => h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, hcb⟩
· rw [ha h₁, hb h₂, mul_one]
exact
_root_.trans
(prod_congr rfl fun c hc =>
h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩)
prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_mul Finset.prod_eq_mul
#align finset.sum_eq_add Finset.sum_eq_add
-- Porting note: simpNF linter complains that LHS doesn't simplify, but it does
/-- A product over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)
"A sum over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`."]
theorem prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x := by
conv_lhs => erw [← prod_map (s.subtype p) (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f]
exact prod_congr (subtype_map _) fun x _hx => rfl
#align finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter
/-- If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a product
over `s.subtype p` equals that product over `s`. -/
@[to_additive "If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a sum
over `s.subtype p` equals that sum over `s`."]
theorem prod_subtype_of_mem (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter, filter_true_of_mem]
simpa using h
#align finset.prod_subtype_of_mem Finset.prod_subtype_of_mem
#align finset.sum_subtype_of_mem Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem
/-- A product of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
product in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
sum in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`."]
theorem prod_subtype_map_embedding {p : α → Prop} {s : Finset { x // p x }} {f : { x // p x } → β}
{g : α → β} (h : ∀ x : { x // p x }, x ∈ s → g x = f x) :
(∏ x ∈ s.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [Finset.prod_map]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl h
#align finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding Finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding
#align finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding
variable (f s)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort_eq_attach (f : s → β) : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.attach, f i :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach
#align finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := prod_attach _ _
#align finset.prod_coe_sort Finset.prod_coe_sort
#align finset.sum_coe_sort Finset.sum_coe_sort
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_coe (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (∏ i : (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_coe_sort s f
#align finset.prod_finset_coe Finset.prod_finset_coe
#align finset.sum_finset_coe Finset.sum_finset_coe
variable {f s}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtype {p : α → Prop} {F : Fintype (Subtype p)} (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
(f : α → β) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a : Subtype p, f a := by
have : (· ∈ s) = p := Set.ext h
subst p
rw [← prod_coe_sort]
congr!
#align finset.prod_subtype Finset.prod_subtype
#align finset.sum_subtype Finset.sum_subtype
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage' (f : ι → κ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f)] (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter (· ∈ Set.range f), g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ preimage s f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ image f (preimage s f hf), g x :=
Eq.symm <| prod_image <| by simpa only [mem_preimage, Set.InjOn] using hf
_ = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => x ∈ Set.range f, g x := by rw [image_preimage]
#align finset.prod_preimage' Finset.prod_preimage'
#align finset.sum_preimage' Finset.sum_preimage'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∉ Set.range f → g x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
classical rw [prod_preimage', prod_filter_of_ne]; exact fun x hx ↦ Not.imp_symm (hg x hx)
#align finset.prod_preimage Finset.prod_preimage
#align finset.sum_preimage Finset.sum_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage_of_bij (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf.injOn, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
prod_preimage _ _ hf.injOn g fun _ hs h_f ↦ (h_f <| hf.subset_range hs).elim
#align finset.prod_preimage_of_bij Finset.prod_preimage_of_bij
#align finset.sum_preimage_of_bij Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_set_coe (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : (∏ i : s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
(Finset.prod_subtype s.toFinset (fun _ ↦ Set.mem_toFinset) f).symm
/-- The product of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the product of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 1` off `s`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the sum of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 0` off `s`."]
theorem prod_congr_set {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {β : Type*} [Fintype β] (s : Set β)
[DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (f : β → α) (g : s → α) (w : ∀ (x : β) (h : x ∈ s), f x = g ⟨x, h⟩)
(w' : ∀ x : β, x ∉ s → f x = 1) : Finset.univ.prod f = Finset.univ.prod g := by
rw [← @Finset.prod_subset _ _ s.toFinset Finset.univ f _ (by simp)]
· rw [Finset.prod_subtype]
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
exact fun ⟨x, h⟩ _ => w x h
· simp
· rintro x _ h
exact w' x (by simpa using h)
#align finset.prod_congr_set Finset.prod_congr_set
#align finset.sum_congr_set Finset.sum_congr_set
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p}
[DecidablePred fun x => ¬p x] (f : ∀ x : α, p x → γ) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → γ) (h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
calc
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) *
∏ x ∈ s.filter (¬p ·), h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) :=
(prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s p _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ _).symm (prod_attach _ _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_congr rfl fun x _hx ↦
congr_arg h (dif_pos <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
(prod_congr rfl fun x _hx => congr_arg h (dif_neg <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
#align finset.prod_apply_dite Finset.prod_apply_dite
#align finset.sum_apply_dite Finset.sum_apply_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {_hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ)
(h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if p x then f x else g x)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (f x)) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, h (g x) :=
(prod_apply_dite _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ (h ∘ f)) (prod_attach _ (h ∘ g))
#align finset.prod_apply_ite Finset.prod_apply_ite
#align finset.sum_apply_ite Finset.sum_apply_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f : ∀ x : α, p x → β)
(g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, f x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, g x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) := by
simp [prod_apply_dite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_dite Finset.prod_dite
#align finset.sum_dite Finset.sum_dite
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/Finset.lean | 1,214 | 1,217 | theorem prod_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, g x := by |
simp [prod_apply_ite _ _ fun x => x]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.norm_num from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e2621d935895abe70071ab828a4ee6e26a52afe4"
/-!
# A `norm_num` extension for Jacobi and Legendre symbols
We extend the `norm_num` tactic so that it can be used to provably compute
the value of the Jacobi symbol `J(a | b)` or the Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` when
the arguments are numerals.
## Implementation notes
We use the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol to compute the value of `J(a | b)`
efficiently, roughly comparable in effort with the euclidean algorithm for the computation
of the gcd of `a` and `b`. More precisely, the computation is done in the following steps.
* Use `J(a | 0) = 1` (an artifact of the definition) and `J(a | 1) = 1` to deal
with corner cases.
* Use `J(a | b) = J(a % b | b)` to reduce to the case that `a` is a natural number.
We define a version of the Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers for use in
the following steps; see `NormNum.jacobiSymNat`. (But we'll continue to write `J(a | b)`
in this description.)
* Remove powers of two from `b`. This is done via `J(2a | 2b) = 0` and
`J(2a+1 | 2b) = J(2a+1 | b)` (another artifact of the definition).
* Now `0 ≤ a < b` and `b` is odd. If `b = 1`, then the value is `1`.
If `a = 0` (and `b > 1`), then the value is `0`. Otherwise, we remove powers of two from `a`
via `J(4a | b) = J(a | b)` and `J(2a | b) = ±J(a | b)`, where the sign is determined
by the residue class of `b` mod 8, to reduce to `a` odd.
* Once `a` is odd, we use Quadratic Reciprocity (QR) in the form
`J(a | b) = ±J(b % a | a)`, where the sign is determined by the residue classes
of `a` and `b` mod 4. We are then back in the previous case.
We provide customized versions of these results for the various reduction steps,
where we encode the residue classes mod 2, mod 4, or mod 8 by using hypotheses like
`a % n = b`. In this way, the only divisions we have to compute and prove
are the ones occurring in the use of QR above.
-/
section Lemmas
namespace Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
/-- The Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers in both arguments. -/
def jacobiSymNat (a b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
jacobiSym a b
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat
/-!
### API Lemmas
We repeat part of the API for `jacobiSym` with `NormNum.jacobiSymNat` and without implicit
arguments, in a form that is suitable for constructing proofs in `norm_num`.
-/
/-- Base cases: `b = 0`, `b = 1`, `a = 0`, `a = 1`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 0 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.zero_right]
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.zero_right Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.zero_right
theorem jacobiSymNat.one_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 1 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.one_right]
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.one_right Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.one_right
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_left (b : ℕ) (hb : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) : jacobiSymNat 0 b = 0 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_zero, jacobiSym.zero_left ?_]
calc
1 < 2 * 1 := by decide
_ ≤ 2 * (b / 2) :=
Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.succ_le.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb)))
_ ≤ b := Nat.mul_div_le b 2
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.zero_left_even Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.zero_left
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.zero_left_odd Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.zero_left
theorem jacobiSymNat.one_left (b : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat 1 b = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_one, jacobiSym.one_left]
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.one_left_even Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.one_left
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.one_left_odd Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.one_left
/-- Turn a Legendre symbol into a Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem LegendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) (pp : Fact p.Prime) (a r : ℤ)
(hr : IsInt (jacobiSym a p) r) : IsInt (legendreSym p a) r := by
rwa [@jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym p pp a]
#align norm_num.legendre_sym.to_jacobi_sym Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.LegendreSym.to_jacobiSym
/-- The value depends only on the residue class of `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem JacobiSym.mod_left (a : ℤ) (b ab' : ℕ) (ab r b' : ℤ) (hb' : (b : ℤ) = b')
(hab : a % b' = ab) (h : (ab' : ℤ) = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab' b = r) : jacobiSym a b = r := by
rw [← hr, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.mod_left, hb', hab, ← h]
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym.mod_left Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.JacobiSym.mod_left
theorem jacobiSymNat.mod_left (a b ab : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (hab : a % b = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab b = r) :
jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
rw [← hr, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSymNat, _root_.jacobiSym.mod_left a b, ← hab]; rfl
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.mod_left Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.mod_left
/-- The symbol vanishes when both entries are even (and `b / 2 ≠ 0`). -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.even_even (a b : ℕ) (hb₀ : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) (ha : a % 2 = 0)
(hb₁ : b % 2 = 0) : jacobiSymNat a b = 0 := by
refine jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff.mpr
⟨ne_of_gt ((Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb₀)).trans_le (Nat.div_le_self b 2)),
fun hf => ?_⟩
have h : 2 ∣ a.gcd b := Nat.dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero ha) (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb₁)
change 2 ∣ (a : ℤ).gcd b at h
rw [hf, ← even_iff_two_dvd] at h
exact Nat.not_even_one h
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.even_even Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.even_even
/-- When `a` is odd and `b` is even, we can replace `b` by `b / 2`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.odd_even (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 1) (hb : b % 2 = 0) (hc : b / 2 = c)
(hr : jacobiSymNat a c = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
have ha' : legendreSym 2 a = 1 := by
simp only [legendreSym.mod 2 a, Int.ofNat_mod_ofNat, ha]
decide
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc')
· rw [← hr, Nat.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb) hc]
· haveI : NeZero c := ⟨hc'⟩
-- for `jacobiSym.mul_right`
rwa [← Nat.mod_add_div b 2, hb, hc, Nat.zero_add, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.mul_right,
← jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym, ha', one_mul]
#align norm_num.jacobi_sym_nat.odd_even Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.jacobiSymNat.odd_even
/-- If `a` is divisible by `4` and `b` is odd, then we can remove the factor `4` from `a`. -/
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean | 135 | 138 | theorem jacobiSymNat.double_even (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 0) (hb : b % 2 = 1)
(hc : a / 4 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by |
simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.ofNat_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat]
exact (jacobiSym.div_four_left (mod_cast ha) hb).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Inner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Trim
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.ae_measurable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d8bbb04e2d2a44596798a9207ceefc0fb236e41e"
/-! # Functions a.e. measurable with respect to a sub-σ-algebra
A function `f` verifies `AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ` if it is `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. This is similar to `AEStronglyMeasurable`, but the
`MeasurableSpace` structures used for the measurability statement and for the measure are
different.
We define `lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ`, the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to an `m`-strongly
measurable function.
## Main statements
We define an `IsometryEquiv` between `lpMeasSubgroup` and the `Lp` space corresponding to the
measure `μ.trim hm`. As a consequence, the completeness of `Lp` implies completeness of `lpMeas`.
`Lp.induction_stronglyMeasurable` (see also `Memℒp.induction_stronglyMeasurable`):
To prove something for an `Lp` function a.e. strongly measurable with respect to a
sub-σ-algebra `m` in a normed space, it suffices to show that
* the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions which are measurable w.r.t. `m`;
* is closed under addition;
* the set of functions in `Lp` strongly measurable w.r.t. `m` for which the property holds is
closed.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A function `f` verifies `AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ` if it is `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. This is similar to `AEStronglyMeasurable`, but the
`MeasurableSpace` structures used for the measurability statement and for the measure are
different. -/
def AEStronglyMeasurable' {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (m : MeasurableSpace α)
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
∃ g : α → β, StronglyMeasurable[m] g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'
namespace AEStronglyMeasurable'
variable {α β 𝕜 : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [TopologicalSpace β]
{f g : α → β}
theorem congr (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ := by
obtain ⟨f', hf'_meas, hff'⟩ := hf; exact ⟨f', hf'_meas, hfg.symm.trans hff'⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.congr MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr
theorem mono {m'} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hm : m ≤ m') :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m' f μ :=
let ⟨f', hf'_meas, hff'⟩ := hf; ⟨f', hf'_meas.mono hm, hff'⟩
theorem add [Add β] [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable' m (f + g) μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨f', h_f'_meas, hff'⟩
rcases hg with ⟨g', h_g'_meas, hgg'⟩
exact ⟨f' + g', h_f'_meas.add h_g'_meas, hff'.add hgg'⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.add MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.add
theorem neg [AddGroup β] [TopologicalAddGroup β] {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m (-f) μ := by
rcases hfm with ⟨f', hf'_meas, hf_ae⟩
refine ⟨-f', hf'_meas.neg, hf_ae.mono fun x hx => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Pi.neg_apply]
rw [hx]
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.neg MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.neg
theorem sub [AddGroup β] [TopologicalAddGroup β] {f g : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable' m (f - g) μ := by
rcases hfm with ⟨f', hf'_meas, hf_ae⟩
rcases hgm with ⟨g', hg'_meas, hg_ae⟩
refine ⟨f' - g', hf'_meas.sub hg'_meas, hf_ae.mp (hg_ae.mono fun x hx1 hx2 => ?_)⟩
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply]
rw [hx1, hx2]
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.sub MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.sub
theorem const_smul [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (c : 𝕜) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m (c • f) μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨f', h_f'_meas, hff'⟩
refine ⟨c • f', h_f'_meas.const_smul c, ?_⟩
exact EventuallyEq.fun_comp hff' fun x => c • x
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.const_smul MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.const_smul
theorem const_inner {𝕜 β} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup β] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 β] {f : α → β}
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (c : β) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m (fun x => (inner c (f x) : 𝕜)) μ := by
rcases hfm with ⟨f', hf'_meas, hf_ae⟩
refine
⟨fun x => (inner c (f' x) : 𝕜), (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ c).inner hf'_meas,
hf_ae.mono fun x hx => ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [hx]
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.const_inner MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.const_inner
/-- An `m`-strongly measurable function almost everywhere equal to `f`. -/
noncomputable def mk (f : α → β) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) : α → β :=
hfm.choose
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.mk MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.mk
theorem stronglyMeasurable_mk {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) :
StronglyMeasurable[m] (hfm.mk f) :=
hfm.choose_spec.1
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.stronglyMeasurable_mk MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.stronglyMeasurable_mk
theorem ae_eq_mk {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] hfm.mk f :=
hfm.choose_spec.2
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.ae_eq_mk MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.ae_eq_mk
theorem continuous_comp {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable' m (g ∘ f) μ :=
⟨fun x => g (hf.mk _ x),
@Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m _ _ _ _ hg hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk,
hf.ae_eq_mk.mono fun x hx => by rw [Function.comp_apply, hx]⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.continuous_comp MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.continuous_comp
end AEStronglyMeasurable'
theorem aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'_trim {α β} {m m0 m0' : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] (hm0 : m0 ≤ m0') {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f (μ.trim hm0)) : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ := by
obtain ⟨g, hg_meas, hfg⟩ := hf; exact ⟨g, hg_meas, ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim hfg⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'_of_ae_strongly_measurable'_trim MeasureTheory.aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'_trim
theorem StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' {α β} {m _ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ :=
⟨f, hf, ae_eq_refl _⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem ae_eq_trim_iff_of_aeStronglyMeasurable' {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → β} (hm : m ≤ m0)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) :
hfm.mk f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] hgm.mk g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
(ae_eq_trim_iff hm hfm.stronglyMeasurable_mk hgm.stronglyMeasurable_mk).trans
⟨fun h => hfm.ae_eq_mk.trans (h.trans hgm.ae_eq_mk.symm), fun h =>
hfm.ae_eq_mk.symm.trans (h.trans hgm.ae_eq_mk)⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_trim_iff_of_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.ae_eq_trim_iff_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_ae_measurable' {α β γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} {f : α → β} {μ : Measure γ} {g : γ → α}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.map g)) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' (mα.comap g) (f ∘ g) μ :=
⟨hf.mk f ∘ g, hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.comp_measurable (measurable_iff_comap_le.mpr le_rfl),
ae_eq_comp hg hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.comp_ae_measurable' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_ae_measurable'
/-- If the restriction to a set `s` of a σ-algebra `m` is included in the restriction to `s` of
another σ-algebra `m₂` (hypothesis `hs`), the set `s` is `m` measurable and a function `f` almost
everywhere supported on `s` is `m`-ae-strongly-measurable, then `f` is also
`m₂`-ae-strongly-measurable. -/
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable'.aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_measurableSpace_le_on {α E}
{m m₂ m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [TopologicalSpace E] [Zero E] (hm : m ≤ m0)
{s : Set α} {f : α → E} (hs_m : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hs : ∀ t, MeasurableSet[m] (s ∩ t) → MeasurableSet[m₂] (s ∩ t))
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m₂ f μ := by
have h_ind_eq : s.indicator (hf.mk f) =ᵐ[μ] f := by
refine Filter.EventuallyEq.trans ?_ <|
indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hm _ hs_m) hf_zero
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp [hxs, hx]
· simp [hxs]
suffices StronglyMeasurable[m₂] (s.indicator (hf.mk f)) from
AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr this.aeStronglyMeasurable' h_ind_eq
have hf_ind : StronglyMeasurable[m] (s.indicator (hf.mk f)) :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.indicator hs_m
exact
hf_ind.stronglyMeasurable_of_measurableSpace_le_on hs_m hs fun x hxs =>
Set.indicator_of_not_mem hxs _
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.ae_strongly_measurable'_of_measurable_space_le_on MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_measurableSpace_le_on
variable {α E' F F' 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- E' for an inner product space on which we compute integrals
[NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] [CompleteSpace E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
section LpMeas
/-! ## The subset `lpMeas` of `Lp` functions a.e. measurable with respect to a sub-sigma-algebra -/
variable (F)
/-- `lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ` is the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. -/
def lpMeasSubgroup (m : MeasurableSpace α) [MeasurableSpace α] (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
AddSubgroup (Lp F p μ) where
carrier := {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ}
zero_mem' := ⟨(0 : α → F), @stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _, Lp.coeFn_zero _ _ _⟩
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := (hf.add hg).congr (Lp.coeFn_add f g).symm
neg_mem' {f} hf := AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr hf.neg (Lp.coeFn_neg f).symm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroup
variable (𝕜)
/-- `lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ` is the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. -/
def lpMeas (m : MeasurableSpace α) [MeasurableSpace α] (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
Submodule 𝕜 (Lp F p μ) where
carrier := {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ}
zero_mem' := ⟨(0 : α → F), @stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _, Lp.coeFn_zero _ _ _⟩
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := (hf.add hg).congr (Lp.coeFn_add f g).symm
smul_mem' c f hf := (hf.const_smul c).congr (Lp.coeFn_smul c f).symm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas MeasureTheory.lpMeas
variable {F 𝕜}
theorem mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable' {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
{f : Lp F p μ} : f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ := by
rw [← AddSubgroup.mem_carrier, lpMeasSubgroup, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_subgroup_iff_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable' {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
{f : Lp F p μ} : f ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← Submodule.mem_carrier, lpMeas, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_iff_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable' {m _ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable' (β := F) m f μ :=
mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas.ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem mem_lpMeas_self {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : Lp F p μ) :
f ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m0 p μ :=
mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mpr (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f)
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_self MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeas_self
theorem lpMeasSubgroup_coe {m _ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ} :
(f : _ → _) = (f : Lp F p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_coe MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroup_coe
theorem lpMeas_coe {m _ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ} :
(f : _ → _) = (f : Lp F p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_coe MeasureTheory.lpMeas_coe
theorem mem_lpMeas_indicatorConstLp {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ m0) {μ : Measure α}
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) {c : F} :
indicatorConstLp p (hm s hs) hμs c ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ :=
⟨s.indicator fun _ : α => c, (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ _).indicator hs,
indicatorConstLp_coeFn⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeas_indicatorConstLp
section CompleteSubspace
/-! ## The subspace `lpMeas` is complete.
We define an `IsometryEquiv` between `lpMeasSubgroup` and the `Lp` space corresponding to the
measure `μ.trim hm`. As a consequence, the completeness of `Lp` implies completeness of
`lpMeasSubgroup` (and `lpMeas`). -/
variable {ι : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- If `f` belongs to `lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ`, then the measurable function it is almost
everywhere equal to (given by `AEMeasurable.mk`) belongs to `ℒp` for the measure `μ.trim hm`. -/
theorem memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p μ)
(hf_meas : f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
Memℒp (mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp hf_meas).choose p (μ.trim hm) := by
have hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ :=
mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp hf_meas
let g := hf.choose
obtain ⟨hg, hfg⟩ := hf.choose_spec
change Memℒp g p (μ.trim hm)
refine ⟨hg.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
have h_snorm_fg : snorm g p (μ.trim hm) = snorm f p μ := by
rw [snorm_trim hm hg]
exact snorm_congr_ae hfg.symm
rw [h_snorm_fg]
exact Lp.snorm_lt_top f
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_trim_of_mem_Lp_meas_subgroup MeasureTheory.memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup
/-- If `f` belongs to `Lp` for the measure `μ.trim hm`, then it belongs to the subgroup
`lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ`. -/
theorem mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
(memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f)).toLp f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ := by
let hf_mem_ℒp := memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f)
rw [mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable']
refine AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr ?_ (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp hf_mem_ℒp).symm
refine aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'_trim hm ?_
exact Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_of_trim MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim
variable (F p μ)
/-- Map from `lpMeasSubgroup` to `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)`. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
Lp F p (μ.trim hm) :=
Memℒp.toLp (mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem).choose
-- Porting note: had to replace `f` with `f.1` here.
(memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim
variable (𝕜)
/-- Map from `lpMeas` to `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)`. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasToLpTrim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) : Lp F p (μ.trim hm) :=
Memℒp.toLp (mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem).choose
-- Porting note: had to replace `f` with `f.1` here.
(memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim MeasureTheory.lpMeasToLpTrim
variable {𝕜}
/-- Map from `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` to `lpMeasSubgroup`, inverse of
`lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
noncomputable def lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ :=
⟨(memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f)).toLp f, mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim hm f⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp_trim_to_Lp_meas_subgroup MeasureTheory.lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup
variable (𝕜)
/-- Map from `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` to `lpMeas`, inverse of `Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim`. -/
noncomputable def lpTrimToLpMeas (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ :=
⟨(memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f)).toLp f, mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim hm f⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp_trim_to_Lp_meas MeasureTheory.lpTrimToLpMeas
variable {F 𝕜 p μ}
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
-- Porting note: replaced `(↑f)` with `f.1` here.
(ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem))).trans
(mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem).choose_spec.2.symm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_ae_eq MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq
theorem lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
-- Porting note: filled in the argument
Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f))
#align measure_theory.Lp_trim_to_Lp_meas_subgroup_ae_eq MeasureTheory.lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq
theorem lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) :
lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
-- Porting note: replaced `(↑f)` with `f.1` here.
(ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem))).trans
(mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem).choose_spec.2.symm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim_ae_eq MeasureTheory.lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq
theorem lpTrimToLpMeas_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpTrimToLpMeas F 𝕜 p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
-- Porting note: filled in the argument
Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f))
#align measure_theory.Lp_trim_to_Lp_meas_ae_eq MeasureTheory.lpTrimToLpMeas_ae_eq
/-- `lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup` is a right inverse of `lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv (hm : m ≤ m0) :
Function.RightInverse (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm) (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm) := by
intro f
ext1
refine
ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_
exact (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq hm _)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_right_inv MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv
/-- `lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup` is a left inverse of `lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv (hm : m ≤ m0) :
Function.LeftInverse (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm) (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm) := by
intro f
ext1
ext1
rw [← lpMeasSubgroup_coe]
exact (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq hm _).trans (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_left_inv MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add (hm : m ≤ m0) (f g : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (f + g) =
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f + lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm g := by
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
refine ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_ ?_
· exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).add (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _)
refine (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
refine
EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).symm
(lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm g).symm)
refine (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [lpMeasSubgroup_coe]
filter_upwards with x using rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_add MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_neg (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (-f) = -lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f := by
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_neg _).symm
refine ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_ ?_
· exact @StronglyMeasurable.neg _ _ _ m _ _ _ (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _)
refine (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (EventuallyEq.neg (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).symm)
refine (Lp.coeFn_neg _).trans ?_
simp_rw [lpMeasSubgroup_coe]
exact eventually_of_forall fun x => by rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_neg MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_neg
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_sub (hm : m ≤ m0) (f g : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (f - g) =
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f - lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add,
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_sub MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_sub
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/AEMeasurable.lean | 433 | 442 | theorem lpMeasToLpTrim_smul (hm : m ≤ m0) (c : 𝕜) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) :
lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm (c • f) = c • lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm f := by |
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
refine ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_ ?_
· exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).const_smul c
refine (lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
refine (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).trans ?_
refine (lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Units
#align_import algebra.associated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
/-!
# Associated, prime, and irreducible elements.
In this file we define the predicate `Prime p`
saying that an element of a commutative monoid with zero is prime.
Namely, `Prime p` means that `p` isn't zero, it isn't a unit,
and `p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b` for all `a`, `b`;
In decomposition monoids (e.g., `ℕ`, `ℤ`), this predicate is equivalent to `Irreducible`,
however this is not true in general.
We also define an equivalence relation `Associated`
saying that two elements of a monoid differ by a multiplication by a unit.
Then we show that the quotient type `Associates` is a monoid
and prove basic properties of this quotient.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
section Prime
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
/-- An element `p` of a commutative monoid with zero (e.g., a ring) is called *prime*,
if it's not zero, not a unit, and `p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b` for all `a`, `b`. -/
def Prime (p : α) : Prop :=
p ≠ 0 ∧ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b
#align prime Prime
namespace Prime
variable {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
theorem ne_zero : p ≠ 0 :=
hp.1
#align prime.ne_zero Prime.ne_zero
theorem not_unit : ¬IsUnit p :=
hp.2.1
#align prime.not_unit Prime.not_unit
theorem not_dvd_one : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_one ·) hp.not_unit
#align prime.not_dvd_one Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem ne_one : p ≠ 1 := fun h => hp.2.1 (h.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
#align prime.ne_one Prime.ne_one
theorem dvd_or_dvd (hp : Prime p) {a b : α} (h : p ∣ a * b) : p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b :=
hp.2.2 a b h
#align prime.dvd_or_dvd Prime.dvd_or_dvd
theorem dvd_mul {a b : α} : p ∣ a * b ↔ p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b :=
⟨hp.dvd_or_dvd, (Or.elim · (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left · _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right · _))⟩
theorem isPrimal (hp : Prime p) : IsPrimal p := fun _a _b dvd ↦ (hp.dvd_or_dvd dvd).elim
(fun h ↦ ⟨p, 1, h, one_dvd _, (mul_one p).symm⟩) fun h ↦ ⟨1, p, one_dvd _, h, (one_mul p).symm⟩
theorem not_dvd_mul {a b : α} (ha : ¬ p ∣ a) (hb : ¬ p ∣ b) : ¬ p ∣ a * b :=
hp.dvd_mul.not.mpr <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem dvd_of_dvd_pow (hp : Prime p) {a : α} {n : ℕ} (h : p ∣ a ^ n) : p ∣ a := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero] at h
have := isUnit_of_dvd_one h
have := not_unit hp
contradiction
rw [pow_succ'] at h
cases' dvd_or_dvd hp h with dvd_a dvd_pow
· assumption
exact ih dvd_pow
#align prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow
theorem dvd_pow_iff_dvd {a : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∣ a ^ n ↔ p ∣ a :=
⟨hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow, (dvd_pow · hn)⟩
end Prime
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime (0 : α) := fun h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align not_prime_zero not_prime_zero
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime (1 : α) := fun h => h.not_unit isUnit_one
#align not_prime_one not_prime_one
section Map
variable [CommMonoidWithZero β] {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [FunLike F α β]
variable [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β] [FunLike G β α] [MulHomClass G β α]
variable (f : F) (g : G) {p : α}
theorem comap_prime (hinv : ∀ a, g (f a : β) = a) (hp : Prime (f p)) : Prime p :=
⟨fun h => hp.1 <| by simp [h], fun h => hp.2.1 <| h.map f, fun a b h => by
refine
(hp.2.2 (f a) (f b) <| by
convert map_dvd f h
simp).imp
?_ ?_ <;>
· intro h
convert ← map_dvd g h <;> apply hinv⟩
#align comap_prime comap_prime
theorem MulEquiv.prime_iff (e : α ≃* β) : Prime p ↔ Prime (e p) :=
⟨fun h => (comap_prime e.symm e fun a => by simp) <| (e.symm_apply_apply p).substr h,
comap_prime e e.symm fun a => by simp⟩
#align mul_equiv.prime_iff MulEquiv.prime_iff
end Map
end Prime
theorem Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
{a b : α} : a ∣ p * b → p ∣ a ∨ a ∣ b := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
rcases hp.2.2 a c (hc ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _) with (h | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' hp.ne_zero] at hc
exact Or.inr (hc.symm ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ a) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ b := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero]
exact one_dvd b
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := ih (dvd_trans (pow_dvd_pow p n.le_succ) h')
rw [pow_succ]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left _ ((hp.dvd_or_dvd _).resolve_left h)
rwa [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero), ← pow_succ, mul_left_comm]
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ b) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ a := by
rw [mul_comm] at h'
exact hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left n h h'
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
theorem Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α}
{n : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hpow : p ^ n.succ ∣ a ^ n.succ * b ^ n) (hb : ¬p ^ 2 ∣ b) : p ∣ a := by
-- Suppose `p ∣ b`, write `b = p * x` and `hy : a ^ n.succ * b ^ n = p ^ n.succ * y`.
cases' hp.dvd_or_dvd ((dvd_pow_self p (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).trans hpow) with H hbdiv
· exact hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow H
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hbdiv
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hpow
-- Then we can divide out a common factor of `p ^ n` from the equation `hy`.
have : a ^ n.succ * x ^ n = p * y := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero) ?_
rw [← mul_assoc _ p, ← pow_succ, ← hy, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc (a ^ n.succ), mul_comm _ (p ^ n),
mul_assoc]
-- So `p ∣ a` (and we're done) or `p ∣ x`, which can't be the case since it implies `p^2 ∣ b`.
refine hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow ((hp.dvd_or_dvd ⟨_, this⟩).resolve_right fun hdvdx => hb ?_)
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hdvdx
rw [pow_two, ← mul_assoc]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd
theorem prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p x y : α} (h : Prime p)
{i : ℕ} (hxy : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x * y) : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x ∨ p ∣ y := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro hy
induction' i with i ih generalizing x
· rw [pow_one] at hxy ⊢
exact (h.dvd_or_dvd hxy).resolve_right hy
rw [pow_succ'] at hxy ⊢
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := (h.dvd_or_dvd (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd hxy)).resolve_right hy
rw [mul_assoc] at hxy
exact mul_dvd_mul_left p (ih ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h.ne_zero).mp hxy))
#align prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul
/-- `Irreducible p` states that `p` is non-unit and only factors into units.
We explicitly avoid stating that `p` is non-zero, this would require a semiring. Assuming only a
monoid allows us to reuse irreducible for associated elements.
-/
structure Irreducible [Monoid α] (p : α) : Prop where
/-- `p` is not a unit -/
not_unit : ¬IsUnit p
/-- if `p` factors then one factor is a unit -/
isUnit_or_isUnit' : ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b
#align irreducible Irreducible
namespace Irreducible
theorem not_dvd_one [CommMonoid α] {p : α} (hp : Irreducible p) : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_one ·) hp.not_unit
#align irreducible.not_dvd_one Irreducible.not_dvd_one
theorem isUnit_or_isUnit [Monoid α] {p : α} (hp : Irreducible p) {a b : α} (h : p = a * b) :
IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
hp.isUnit_or_isUnit' a b h
#align irreducible.is_unit_or_is_unit Irreducible.isUnit_or_isUnit
end Irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p : α} :
Irreducible p ↔ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
#align irreducible_iff irreducible_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_one [Monoid α] : ¬Irreducible (1 : α) := by simp [irreducible_iff]
#align not_irreducible_one not_irreducible_one
theorem Irreducible.ne_one [Monoid α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 1
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_one hp
#align irreducible.ne_one Irreducible.ne_one
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ¬Irreducible (0 : α)
| ⟨hn0, h⟩ =>
have : IsUnit (0 : α) ∨ IsUnit (0 : α) := h 0 0 (mul_zero 0).symm
this.elim hn0 hn0
#align not_irreducible_zero not_irreducible_zero
theorem Irreducible.ne_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 0
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_zero hp
#align irreducible.ne_zero Irreducible.ne_zero
theorem of_irreducible_mul {α} [Monoid α] {x y : α} : Irreducible (x * y) → IsUnit x ∨ IsUnit y
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h _ _ rfl
#align of_irreducible_mul of_irreducible_mul
theorem not_irreducible_pow {α} [Monoid α] {x : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) :
¬ Irreducible (x ^ n) := by
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
have := h₂ _ _ (pow_succ _ _)
rw [isUnit_pow_iff (Nat.succ_ne_succ.mp hn), or_self] at this
exact h₁ (this.pow _)
#noalign of_irreducible_pow
theorem irreducible_or_factor {α} [Monoid α] (x : α) (h : ¬IsUnit x) :
Irreducible x ∨ ∃ a b, ¬IsUnit a ∧ ¬IsUnit b ∧ a * b = x := by
haveI := Classical.dec
refine or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun H => ?_
simp? [h, irreducible_iff] at H ⊢ says
simp only [exists_and_left, not_exists, not_and, irreducible_iff, h, not_false_eq_true,
true_and] at H ⊢
refine fun a b h => by_contradiction fun o => ?_
simp? [not_or] at o says simp only [not_or] at o
exact H _ o.1 _ o.2 h.symm
#align irreducible_or_factor irreducible_or_factor
/-- If `p` and `q` are irreducible, then `p ∣ q` implies `q ∣ p`. -/
theorem Irreducible.dvd_symm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q → q ∣ p := by
rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
rw [IsUnit.mul_right_dvd (Or.resolve_left (of_irreducible_mul hq) hp.not_unit)]
#align irreducible.dvd_symm Irreducible.dvd_symm
theorem Irreducible.dvd_comm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q ↔ q ∣ p :=
⟨hp.dvd_symm hq, hq.dvd_symm hp⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_comm Irreducible.dvd_comm
section
variable [Monoid α]
theorem irreducible_units_mul (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (↑a * b) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_units_mul, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← a.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← a⁻¹.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align irreducible_units_mul irreducible_units_mul
theorem irreducible_isUnit_mul {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_units_mul a b
#align irreducible_is_unit_mul irreducible_isUnit_mul
theorem irreducible_mul_units (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (b * ↑a) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_mul_units, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a⁻¹]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]
#align irreducible_mul_units irreducible_mul_units
theorem irreducible_mul_isUnit {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (b * a) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_mul_units a b
#align irreducible_mul_is_unit irreducible_mul_isUnit
theorem irreducible_mul_iff {a b : α} :
Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible a ∧ IsUnit b ∨ Irreducible b ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· refine fun h => Or.imp (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (h.isUnit_or_isUnit rfl).symm
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit h'] at h
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul h'] at h
· rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩ | ⟨hb, ha⟩)
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit hb]
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul ha]
#align irreducible_mul_iff irreducible_mul_iff
end
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a : α}
theorem Irreducible.not_square (ha : Irreducible a) : ¬IsSquare a := by
rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq]
rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact not_irreducible_pow (by decide) ha
#align irreducible.not_square Irreducible.not_square
theorem IsSquare.not_irreducible (ha : IsSquare a) : ¬Irreducible a := fun h => h.not_square ha
#align is_square.not_irreducible IsSquare.not_irreducible
end CommMonoid
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
theorem Irreducible.prime_of_isPrimal {a : α}
(irr : Irreducible a) (primal : IsPrimal a) : Prime a :=
⟨irr.ne_zero, irr.not_unit, fun a b dvd ↦ by
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ := primal dvd
exact (of_irreducible_mul irr).symm.imp (·.mul_right_dvd.mpr h₁) (·.mul_left_dvd.mpr h₂)⟩
theorem Irreducible.prime [DecompositionMonoid α] {a : α} (irr : Irreducible a) : Prime a :=
irr.prime_of_isPrimal (DecompositionMonoid.primal a)
end CommMonoidWithZero
section CancelCommMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a p : α}
protected theorem Prime.irreducible (hp : Prime p) : Irreducible p :=
⟨hp.not_unit, fun a b ↦ by
rintro rfl
exact (hp.dvd_or_dvd dvd_rfl).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_dvd_one <| (mul_dvd_mul_iff_right <| right_ne_zero_of_mul hp.ne_zero).mp <|
dvd_mul_of_dvd_right · _)
(isUnit_of_dvd_one <| (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left <| left_ne_zero_of_mul hp.ne_zero).mp <|
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left · _)⟩
#align prime.irreducible Prime.irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff_prime [DecompositionMonoid α] {a : α} : Irreducible a ↔ Prime a :=
⟨Irreducible.prime, Prime.irreducible⟩
theorem succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul (hp : Prime p) {a b : α} {k l : ℕ} :
p ^ k ∣ a → p ^ l ∣ b → p ^ (k + l + 1) ∣ a * b → p ^ (k + 1) ∣ a ∨ p ^ (l + 1) ∣ b :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ⟨z, hz⟩ =>
have h : p ^ (k + l) * (x * y) = p ^ (k + l) * (p * z) := by
simpa [mul_comm, pow_add, hx, hy, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm] using hz
have hp0 : p ^ (k + l) ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero
have hpd : p ∣ x * y := ⟨z, by rwa [mul_right_inj' hp0] at h⟩
(hp.dvd_or_dvd hpd).elim
(fun ⟨d, hd⟩ => Or.inl ⟨d, by simp [*, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]⟩)
fun ⟨d, hd⟩ => Or.inr ⟨d, by simp [*, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]⟩
#align succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.not_square (hp : Prime p) : ¬IsSquare p :=
hp.irreducible.not_square
#align prime.not_square Prime.not_square
theorem IsSquare.not_prime (ha : IsSquare a) : ¬Prime a := fun h => h.not_square ha
#align is_square.not_prime IsSquare.not_prime
theorem not_prime_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ¬Prime (a ^ n) := fun hp =>
not_irreducible_pow hn hp.irreducible
#align pow_not_prime not_prime_pow
end CancelCommMonoidWithZero
/-- Two elements of a `Monoid` are `Associated` if one of them is another one
multiplied by a unit on the right. -/
def Associated [Monoid α] (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ u : αˣ, x * u = y
#align associated Associated
/-- Notation for two elements of a monoid are associated, i.e.
if one of them is another one multiplied by a unit on the right. -/
local infixl:50 " ~ᵤ " => Associated
namespace Associated
@[refl]
protected theorem refl [Monoid α] (x : α) : x ~ᵤ x :=
⟨1, by simp⟩
#align associated.refl Associated.refl
protected theorem rfl [Monoid α] {x : α} : x ~ᵤ x :=
.refl x
instance [Monoid α] : IsRefl α Associated :=
⟨Associated.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm [Monoid α] : ∀ {x y : α}, x ~ᵤ y → y ~ᵤ x
| x, _, ⟨u, rfl⟩ => ⟨u⁻¹, by rw [mul_assoc, Units.mul_inv, mul_one]⟩
#align associated.symm Associated.symm
instance [Monoid α] : IsSymm α Associated :=
⟨fun _ _ => Associated.symm⟩
protected theorem comm [Monoid α] {x y : α} : x ~ᵤ y ↔ y ~ᵤ x :=
⟨Associated.symm, Associated.symm⟩
#align associated.comm Associated.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans [Monoid α] : ∀ {x y z : α}, x ~ᵤ y → y ~ᵤ z → x ~ᵤ z
| x, _, _, ⟨u, rfl⟩, ⟨v, rfl⟩ => ⟨u * v, by rw [Units.val_mul, mul_assoc]⟩
#align associated.trans Associated.trans
instance [Monoid α] : IsTrans α Associated :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => Associated.trans⟩
/-- The setoid of the relation `x ~ᵤ y` iff there is a unit `u` such that `x * u = y` -/
protected def setoid (α : Type*) [Monoid α] :
Setoid α where
r := Associated
iseqv := ⟨Associated.refl, Associated.symm, Associated.trans⟩
#align associated.setoid Associated.setoid
theorem map {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N]
(f : F) {x y : M} (ha : Associated x y) : Associated (f x) (f y) := by
obtain ⟨u, ha⟩ := ha
exact ⟨Units.map f u, by rw [← ha, map_mul, Units.coe_map, MonoidHom.coe_coe]⟩
end Associated
attribute [local instance] Associated.setoid
theorem unit_associated_one [Monoid α] {u : αˣ} : (u : α) ~ᵤ 1 :=
⟨u⁻¹, Units.mul_inv u⟩
#align unit_associated_one unit_associated_one
@[simp]
theorem associated_one_iff_isUnit [Monoid α] {a : α} : (a : α) ~ᵤ 1 ↔ IsUnit a :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨c, h⟩ := h.symm
h ▸ ⟨c, (one_mul _).symm⟩)
fun ⟨c, h⟩ => Associated.symm ⟨c, by simp [h]⟩
#align associated_one_iff_is_unit associated_one_iff_isUnit
@[simp]
theorem associated_zero_iff_eq_zero [MonoidWithZero α] (a : α) : a ~ᵤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨u, h⟩ := h.symm
simpa using h.symm)
fun h => h ▸ Associated.refl a
#align associated_zero_iff_eq_zero associated_zero_iff_eq_zero
theorem associated_one_of_mul_eq_one [CommMonoid α] {a : α} (b : α) (hab : a * b = 1) : a ~ᵤ 1 :=
show (Units.mkOfMulEqOne a b hab : α) ~ᵤ 1 from unit_associated_one
#align associated_one_of_mul_eq_one associated_one_of_mul_eq_one
theorem associated_one_of_associated_mul_one [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} : a * b ~ᵤ 1 → a ~ᵤ 1
| ⟨u, h⟩ => associated_one_of_mul_eq_one (b * u) <| by simpa [mul_assoc] using h
#align associated_one_of_associated_mul_one associated_one_of_associated_mul_one
theorem associated_mul_unit_left {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) a :=
let ⟨u', hu⟩ := hu
⟨u'⁻¹, hu ▸ Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _⟩
#align associated_mul_unit_left associated_mul_unit_left
theorem associated_unit_mul_left {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) a := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu
#align associated_unit_mul_left associated_unit_mul_left
theorem associated_mul_unit_right {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (a * u) :=
(associated_mul_unit_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_mul_unit_right associated_mul_unit_right
theorem associated_unit_mul_right {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * a) :=
(associated_unit_mul_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_unit_mul_right associated_unit_mul_right
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
⟨(associated_mul_unit_right _ _ hu).trans, (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu).trans⟩
#align associated_mul_is_unit_left_iff associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {u a b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) b ↔ Associated a b := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu
#align associated_is_unit_mul_left_iff associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b u : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_mul_is_unit_right_iff associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_is_unit_mul_right_iff associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_left_iff associated_mul_unit_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (↑u * a) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_left_iff associated_unit_mul_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_right_iff associated_mul_unit_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (↑u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_right_iff associated_unit_mul_right_iff
theorem Associated.mul_left [Monoid α] (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a * b ~ᵤ a * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_left Associated.mul_left
theorem Associated.mul_right [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) (c : α) : a * c ~ᵤ b * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_right_comm _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_right Associated.mul_right
theorem Associated.mul_mul [CommMonoid α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
(h₁ : a₁ ~ᵤ b₁) (h₂ : a₂ ~ᵤ b₂) : a₁ * a₂ ~ᵤ b₁ * b₂ := (h₁.mul_right _).trans (h₂.mul_left _)
#align associated.mul_mul Associated.mul_mul
theorem Associated.pow_pow [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ^ n ~ᵤ b ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp [Associated.refl]
convert h.mul_mul ih <;> rw [pow_succ']
#align associated.pow_pow Associated.pow_pow
protected theorem Associated.dvd [Monoid α] {a b : α} : a ~ᵤ b → a ∣ b := fun ⟨u, hu⟩ =>
⟨u, hu.symm⟩
#align associated.dvd Associated.dvd
protected theorem Associated.dvd' [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : b ∣ a :=
h.symm.dvd
protected theorem Associated.dvd_dvd [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ∣ b ∧ b ∣ a :=
⟨h.dvd, h.symm.dvd⟩
#align associated.dvd_dvd Associated.dvd_dvd
theorem associated_of_dvd_dvd [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
a ~ᵤ b := by
rcases hab with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases hba with ⟨d, a_eq⟩
by_cases ha0 : a = 0
· simp_all
have hac0 : a * c ≠ 0 := by
intro con
rw [con, zero_mul] at a_eq
apply ha0 a_eq
have : a * (c * d) = a * 1 := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← a_eq, mul_one]
have hcd : c * d = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ ha0 this
have : a * c * (d * c) = a * c * 1 := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← a_eq, mul_one]
have hdc : d * c = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hac0 this
exact ⟨⟨c, d, hcd, hdc⟩, rfl⟩
#align associated_of_dvd_dvd associated_of_dvd_dvd
theorem dvd_dvd_iff_associated [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} : a ∣ b ∧ b ∣ a ↔ a ~ᵤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => associated_of_dvd_dvd h1 h2, Associated.dvd_dvd⟩
#align dvd_dvd_iff_associated dvd_dvd_iff_associated
instance [CancelMonoidWithZero α] [DecidableRel ((· ∣ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
DecidableRel ((· ~ᵤ ·) : α → α → Prop) := fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff _ dvd_dvd_iff_associated
theorem Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left [Monoid α] {a b c : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ∣ c ↔ b ∣ c :=
let ⟨_, hu⟩ := h
hu ▸ Units.mul_right_dvd.symm
#align associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left
theorem Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right [Monoid α] {a b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ c :=
let ⟨_, hu⟩ := h
hu ▸ Units.dvd_mul_right.symm
#align associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right
theorem Associated.eq_zero_iff [MonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [← Units.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq, zero_mul]
#align associated.eq_zero_iff Associated.eq_zero_iff
theorem Associated.ne_zero_iff [MonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ≠ 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 :=
not_congr h.eq_zero_iff
#align associated.ne_zero_iff Associated.ne_zero_iff
theorem Associated.neg_left [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated (-a) b :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h; ⟨-u, by simp [hu]⟩
theorem Associated.neg_right [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated a (-b) :=
h.symm.neg_left.symm
theorem Associated.neg_neg [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated (-a) (-b) :=
h.neg_left.neg_right
protected theorem Associated.prime [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) (hp : Prime p) :
Prime q :=
⟨h.ne_zero_iff.1 hp.ne_zero,
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
⟨fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => hp.not_unit ⟨v * u⁻¹, by simp [hv, hu.symm]⟩,
hu ▸ by
simp only [IsUnit.mul_iff, Units.isUnit, and_true, IsUnit.mul_right_dvd]
intro a b
exact hp.dvd_or_dvd⟩⟩
#align associated.prime Associated.prime
theorem prime_mul_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {x y : α} :
Prime (x * y) ↔ (Prime x ∧ IsUnit y) ∨ (IsUnit x ∧ Prime y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases of_irreducible_mul h.irreducible with hx | hy
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, (associated_unit_mul_left y x hx).prime h⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨(associated_mul_unit_left x y hy).prime h, hy⟩
· rintro (⟨hx, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, hy⟩)
· exact (associated_mul_unit_left x y hy).symm.prime hx
· exact (associated_unit_mul_right y x hx).prime hy
@[simp]
lemma prime_pow_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} {n : ℕ} :
Prime (p ^ n) ↔ Prime p ∧ n = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, fun ⟨hp, hn⟩ ↦ by simpa [hn]⟩
suffices n = 1 by aesop
cases' n with n
· simp at hp
· rw [Nat.succ.injEq]
rw [pow_succ', prime_mul_iff] at hp
rcases hp with ⟨hp, hpn⟩ | ⟨hp, hpn⟩
· by_contra contra
rw [isUnit_pow_iff contra] at hpn
exact hp.not_unit hpn
· exfalso
exact hpn.not_unit (hp.pow n)
theorem Irreducible.dvd_iff [Monoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
y ∣ x ↔ IsUnit y ∨ Associated x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
obtain (h|h) := hx.isUnit_or_isUnit hz
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [hz]
exact Or.inr (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ h)
· rintro (hy|h)
· exact hy.dvd
· exact h.symm.dvd
theorem Irreducible.associated_of_dvd [Monoid α] {p q : α} (p_irr : Irreducible p)
(q_irr : Irreducible q) (dvd : p ∣ q) : Associated p q :=
((q_irr.dvd_iff.mp dvd).resolve_left p_irr.not_unit).symm
#align irreducible.associated_of_dvd Irreducible.associated_of_dvdₓ
theorem Irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated [Monoid α] {p q : α}
(pp : Irreducible p) (qp : Irreducible q) : p ∣ q ↔ Associated p q :=
⟨Irreducible.associated_of_dvd pp qp, Associated.dvd⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated Irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated
theorem Prime.associated_of_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (p_prime : Prime p)
(q_prime : Prime q) (dvd : p ∣ q) : Associated p q :=
p_prime.irreducible.associated_of_dvd q_prime.irreducible dvd
#align prime.associated_of_dvd Prime.associated_of_dvd
theorem Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (pp : Prime p)
(qp : Prime q) : p ∣ q ↔ Associated p q :=
pp.irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated qp.irreducible
#align prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated
theorem Associated.prime_iff [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) : Prime p ↔ Prime q :=
⟨h.prime, h.symm.prime⟩
#align associated.prime_iff Associated.prime_iff
protected theorem Associated.isUnit [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : IsUnit a → IsUnit b :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => ⟨v * u, by simp [hv, hu.symm]⟩
#align associated.is_unit Associated.isUnit
theorem Associated.isUnit_iff [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : IsUnit a ↔ IsUnit b :=
⟨h.isUnit, h.symm.isUnit⟩
#align associated.is_unit_iff Associated.isUnit_iff
theorem Irreducible.isUnit_iff_not_associated_of_dvd [Monoid α]
{x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) (hy : y ∣ x) : IsUnit y ↔ ¬ Associated x y :=
⟨fun hy hxy => hx.1 (hxy.symm.isUnit hy), (hx.dvd_iff.mp hy).resolve_right⟩
protected theorem Associated.irreducible [Monoid α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) (hp : Irreducible p) :
Irreducible q :=
⟨mt h.symm.isUnit hp.1,
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
fun a b hab =>
have hpab : p = a * (b * (u⁻¹ : αˣ)) :=
calc
p = p * u * (u⁻¹ : αˣ) := by simp
_ = _ := by rw [hu]; simp [hab, mul_assoc]
(hp.isUnit_or_isUnit hpab).elim Or.inl fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => Or.inr ⟨v * u, by simp [hv]⟩⟩
#align associated.irreducible Associated.irreducible
protected theorem Associated.irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) :
Irreducible p ↔ Irreducible q :=
⟨h.irreducible, h.symm.irreducible⟩
#align associated.irreducible_iff Associated.irreducible_iff
theorem Associated.of_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b ~ᵤ c * d)
(h₁ : a ~ᵤ c) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b ~ᵤ d :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := Associated.symm h₁
⟨u * (v : αˣ),
mul_left_cancel₀ ha
(by
rw [← hv, mul_assoc c (v : α) d, mul_left_comm c, ← hu]
simp [hv.symm, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm])⟩
#align associated.of_mul_left Associated.of_mul_left
theorem Associated.of_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d : α} :
a * b ~ᵤ c * d → b ~ᵤ d → b ≠ 0 → a ~ᵤ c := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm c]; exact Associated.of_mul_left
#align associated.of_mul_right Associated.of_mul_right
theorem Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p₁ p₂ : α} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
(hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₁) (h : p₁ ^ k₁ ~ᵤ p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ ~ᵤ p₂ := by
have : p₁ ∣ p₂ ^ k₂ := by
rw [← h.dvd_iff_dvd_right]
apply dvd_pow_self _ hk₁.ne'
rw [← hp₁.dvd_prime_iff_associated hp₂]
exact hp₁.dvd_of_dvd_pow this
#align associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime
theorem Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime' [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p₁ p₂ : α} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
(hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₂ : 0 < k₂) (h : p₁ ^ k₁ ~ᵤ p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ ~ᵤ p₂ :=
(h.symm.of_pow_associated_of_prime hp₂ hp₁ hk₂).symm
#align associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime' Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime'
/-- See also `Irreducible.coprime_iff_not_dvd`. -/
lemma Irreducible.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd [Monoid α] {p n : α} (hp : Irreducible p) :
IsRelPrime p n ↔ ¬ p ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h contra ↦ hp.not_unit (h dvd_rfl contra), fun hpn d hdp hdn ↦ ?_⟩
contrapose! hpn
suffices Associated p d from this.dvd.trans hdn
exact (hp.dvd_iff.mp hdp).resolve_left hpn
lemma Irreducible.dvd_or_isRelPrime [Monoid α] {p n : α} (hp : Irreducible p) :
p ∣ n ∨ IsRelPrime p n := Classical.or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr hp.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd.2
section UniqueUnits
variable [Monoid α] [Unique αˣ]
theorem associated_iff_eq {x y : α} : x ~ᵤ y ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [units_eq_one c, Units.val_one, mul_one]
· rintro rfl
rfl
#align associated_iff_eq associated_iff_eq
theorem associated_eq_eq : (Associated : α → α → Prop) = Eq := by
ext
rw [associated_iff_eq]
#align associated_eq_eq associated_eq_eq
theorem prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq {M : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero M] [Unique Mˣ] {p q : M}
(pp : Prime p) (qp : Prime q) : p ∣ q ↔ p = q := by
rw [pp.dvd_prime_iff_associated qp, ← associated_eq_eq]
#align prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq
end UniqueUnits
section UniqueUnits₀
variable {R : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] [Unique Rˣ] {p₁ p₂ : R} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
theorem eq_of_prime_pow_eq (hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₁)
(h : p₁ ^ k₁ = p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq] at h ⊢
apply h.of_pow_associated_of_prime hp₁ hp₂ hk₁
#align eq_of_prime_pow_eq eq_of_prime_pow_eq
theorem eq_of_prime_pow_eq' (hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₂)
(h : p₁ ^ k₁ = p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq] at h ⊢
apply h.of_pow_associated_of_prime' hp₁ hp₂ hk₁
#align eq_of_prime_pow_eq' eq_of_prime_pow_eq'
end UniqueUnits₀
/-- The quotient of a monoid by the `Associated` relation. Two elements `x` and `y`
are associated iff there is a unit `u` such that `x * u = y`. There is a natural
monoid structure on `Associates α`. -/
abbrev Associates (α : Type*) [Monoid α] : Type _ :=
Quotient (Associated.setoid α)
#align associates Associates
namespace Associates
open Associated
/-- The canonical quotient map from a monoid `α` into the `Associates` of `α` -/
protected abbrev mk {α : Type*} [Monoid α] (a : α) : Associates α :=
⟦a⟧
#align associates.mk Associates.mk
instance [Monoid α] : Inhabited (Associates α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff_associated [Monoid α] {a b : α} : Associates.mk a = Associates.mk b ↔ a ~ᵤ b :=
Iff.intro Quotient.exact Quot.sound
#align associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated
theorem quotient_mk_eq_mk [Monoid α] (a : α) : ⟦a⟧ = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk [Monoid α] (a : α) : Quot.mk Setoid.r a = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.quot_mk_eq_mk Associates.quot_mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem quot_out [Monoid α] (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk (Quot.out a) = a := by
rw [← quot_mk_eq_mk, Quot.out_eq]
#align associates.quot_out Associates.quot_outₓ
theorem mk_quot_out [Monoid α] (a : α) : Quot.out (Associates.mk a) ~ᵤ a := by
rw [← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, Associates.quot_out]
theorem forall_associated [Monoid α] {p : Associates α → Prop} :
(∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, p (Associates.mk a) :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ => h _) fun h a => Quotient.inductionOn a h
#align associates.forall_associated Associates.forall_associated
theorem mk_surjective [Monoid α] : Function.Surjective (@Associates.mk α _) :=
forall_associated.2 fun a => ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align associates.mk_surjective Associates.mk_surjective
instance [Monoid α] : One (Associates α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_one [Monoid α] : Associates.mk (1 : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_one Associates.mk_one
theorem one_eq_mk_one [Monoid α] : (1 : Associates α) = Associates.mk 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.one_eq_mk_one Associates.one_eq_mk_one
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Associated.lean | 883 | 884 | theorem mk_eq_one [Monoid α] {a : α} : Associates.mk a = 1 ↔ IsUnit a := by |
rw [← mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, associated_one_iff_isUnit]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Maximal
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2bbc7e3884ba234309d2a43b19144105a753292e"
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Frölich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
#align fractional_ideal.inv_eq FractionalIdeal.inv_eq
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
#align fractional_ideal.inv_zero' FractionalIdeal.inv_zero'
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
#align fractional_ideal.inv_nonzero FractionalIdeal.inv_nonzero
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_inv_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.coe_inv_of_nonzero
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
#align fractional_ideal.mem_inv_iff FractionalIdeal.mem_inv_iff
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
#align fractional_ideal.inv_anti_mono FractionalIdeal.inv_anti_mono
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
#align fractional_ideal.le_self_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.le_self_mul_inv
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hx hy
#align fractional_ideal.right_inverse_eq FractionalIdeal.right_inverse_eq
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel_iff FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel_iff
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
#align fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel_iff_is_unit FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq, map_div, map_one, inv_eq]
#align fractional_ideal.map_inv FractionalIdeal.map_inv
open Submodule Submodule.IsPrincipal
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_inv (x : K) : (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = spanSingleton _ x⁻¹ :=
one_div_spanSingleton x
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_inv FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_inv
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF form
theorem spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton (x y : K) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ y = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (x / y) := by
rw [div_spanSingleton, mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_div_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton
theorem spanSingleton_div_self {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton, div_self hx, spanSingleton_one]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_div_self FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_div_self
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_div_self K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self
theorem spanSingleton_mul_inv {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x * (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_inv, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel hx, spanSingleton_one]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_mul_inv
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) *
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_mul_inv K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv
theorem spanSingleton_inv_mul {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ * spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_inv K hx]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_inv_mul FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_inv_mul
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ * Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv K hx]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul
theorem mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsLocalization R₁⁰ K]
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- Rewrite only the `I` that appears alone.
conv_lhs => congr; rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel, spanSingleton_one]
intro generator_I_eq_zero
apply h
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, generator_I_eq_zero, spanSingleton_zero]
#align fractional_ideal.mul_generator_self_inv FractionalIdeal.mul_generator_self_inv
theorem invertible_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_div_self_cancel_iff.mpr
⟨spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹, mul_generator_self_inv _ I h⟩
#align fractional_ideal.invertible_of_principal FractionalIdeal.invertible_of_principal
theorem invertible_iff_generator_nonzero (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ generator (I : Submodule R₁ K) ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· intro hI hg
apply ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hI
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, hg, spanSingleton_zero]
· intro hg
apply invertible_of_principal
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
intro hI
have := mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))
rw [hI, mem_zero_iff] at this
contradiction
#align fractional_ideal.invertible_iff_generator_nonzero FractionalIdeal.invertible_iff_generator_nonzero
theorem isPrincipal_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)]
(h : I ≠ 0) : Submodule.IsPrincipal I⁻¹.1 := by
rw [val_eq_coe, isPrincipal_iff]
use (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹
have hI : I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_generator_self_inv _ I h
exact (right_inverse_eq _ I (spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹) hI).symm
#align fractional_ideal.is_principal_inv FractionalIdeal.isPrincipal_inv
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := { inv_one := div_one }
end FractionalIdeal
section IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [IsDomain A]
/-- A Dedekind domain is an integral domain such that every fractional ideal has an inverse.
This is equivalent to `IsDedekindDomain`.
In particular we provide a `fractional_ideal.comm_group_with_zero` instance,
assuming `IsDedekindDomain A`, which implies `IsDedekindDomainInv`. For **integral** ideals,
`IsDedekindDomain`(`_inv`) implies only `Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero`.
-/
def IsDedekindDomainInv : Prop :=
∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), I * I⁻¹ = 1
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv IsDedekindDomainInv
open FractionalIdeal
variable {R A K}
theorem isDedekindDomainInv_iff [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] :
IsDedekindDomainInv A ↔ ∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
let h : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A) ≃+* FractionalIdeal A⁰ K :=
FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv (FractionRing.algEquiv A K)
refine h.toEquiv.forall_congr (fun {x} => ?_)
rw [← h.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
simp [h, IsDedekindDomainInv]
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv_iff isDedekindDomainInv_iff
theorem FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (x : K)
(hx : IsIntegral A x) (hI : IsUnit (adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx)) : adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx = 1 := by
set I := adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx
have mul_self : I * I = I := by apply coeToSubmodule_injective; simp [I]
convert congr_arg (· * I⁻¹) mul_self <;>
simp only [(mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit K).mpr hI, mul_assoc, mul_one]
#align fractional_ideal.adjoin_integral_eq_one_of_is_unit FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit
namespace IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (h : IsDedekindDomainInv A)
theorem mul_inv_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
isDedekindDomainInv_iff.mp h I hI
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv.mul_inv_eq_one IsDedekindDomainInv.mul_inv_eq_one
theorem inv_mul_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I⁻¹ * I = 1 :=
(mul_comm _ _).trans (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv.inv_mul_eq_one IsDedekindDomainInv.inv_mul_eq_one
protected theorem isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : IsUnit I :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv.is_unit IsDedekindDomainInv.isUnit
theorem isNoetherianRing : IsNoetherianRing A := by
refine isNoetherianRing_iff.mpr ⟨fun I : Ideal A => ?_⟩
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· rw [hI]; apply Submodule.fg_bot
have hI : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
exact I.fg_of_isUnit (IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A)) (h.isUnit hI)
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv.is_noetherian_ring IsDedekindDomainInv.isNoetherianRing
theorem integrallyClosed : IsIntegrallyClosed A := by
-- It suffices to show that for integral `x`,
-- `A[x]` (which is a fractional ideal) is in fact equal to `A`.
refine (isIntegrallyClosed_iff (FractionRing A)).mpr (fun {x hx} => ?_)
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← Algebra.mem_bot, ← Subalgebra.mem_toSubmodule, Algebra.toSubmodule_bot,
Submodule.one_eq_span, ← coe_spanSingleton A⁰ (1 : FractionRing A), spanSingleton_one, ←
FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit x hx (h.isUnit _)]
· exact mem_adjoinIntegral_self A⁰ x hx
· exact fun h => one_ne_zero (eq_zero_iff.mp h 1 (Algebra.adjoin A {x}).one_mem)
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv.integrally_closed IsDedekindDomainInv.integrallyClosed
open Ring
theorem dimensionLEOne : DimensionLEOne A := ⟨by
-- We're going to show that `P` is maximal because any (maximal) ideal `M`
-- that is strictly larger would be `⊤`.
rintro P P_ne hP
refine Ideal.isMaximal_def.mpr ⟨hP.ne_top, fun M hM => ?_⟩
-- We may assume `P` and `M` (as fractional ideals) are nonzero.
have P'_ne : (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr P_ne
have M'_ne : (M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hM.ne_bot
-- In particular, we'll show `M⁻¹ * P ≤ P`
suffices (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ P by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A), coeIdeal_top]
calc
(1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = _ * _ * _ := ?_
_ ≤ _ * _ := mul_right_mono
((P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) this
_ = M := ?_
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne,
one_mul, h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
· rw [← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne, one_mul]
-- Suppose we have `x ∈ M⁻¹ * P`, then in fact `x = algebraMap _ _ y` for some `y`.
intro x hx
have le_one : (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ 1 := by
rw [← h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A)).mpr hM.le)
obtain ⟨y, _hy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp (le_one hx)
-- Since `M` is strictly greater than `P`, let `z ∈ M \ P`.
obtain ⟨z, hzM, hzp⟩ := SetLike.exists_of_lt hM
-- We have `z * y ∈ M * (M⁻¹ * P) = P`.
have zy_mem := mul_mem_mul (mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ hzM) hx
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_inv_eq_one M'_ne, one_mul] at zy_mem
obtain ⟨zy, hzy, zy_eq⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal A⁰).mp zy_mem
rw [IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A) zy_eq] at hzy
-- But `P` is a prime ideal, so `z ∉ P` implies `y ∈ P`, as desired.
exact mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ (Or.resolve_left (hP.mem_or_mem hzy) hzp)⟩
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv.dimension_le_one IsDedekindDomainInv.dimensionLEOne
/-- Showing one side of the equivalence between the definitions
`IsDedekindDomainInv` and `IsDedekindDomain` of Dedekind domains. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain : IsDedekindDomain A :=
{ h.isNoetherianRing, h.dimensionLEOne, h.integrallyClosed with }
#align is_dedekind_domain_inv.is_dedekind_domain IsDedekindDomainInv.isDedekindDomain
end IsDedekindDomainInv
end IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable {A K}
theorem one_mem_inv_coe_ideal [IsDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(1 : K) ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ := by
rw [FractionalIdeal.mem_inv_iff (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI)]
intro y hy
rw [one_mul]
exact FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_le_one hy
-- #align fractional_ideal.one_mem_inv_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.one_mem_inv_coe_ideal
/-- Specialization of `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` to Dedekind domains:
Let `I : Ideal A` be a nonzero ideal, where `A` is a Dedekind domain that is not a field.
Then `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` states we can find a product of prime
ideals that is contained within `I`. This lemma extends that result by making the product minimal:
let `M` be a maximal ideal that contains `I`, then the product including `M` is contained within `I`
and the product excluding `M` is not contained within `I`. -/
theorem exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le [IsDedekindDomain A] (hNF : ¬IsField A)
{I M : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hIM : I ≤ M) [hM : M.IsMaximal] :
∃ Z : Multiset (PrimeSpectrum A),
(M ::ₘ Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧
¬Multiset.prod (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal) ≤ I := by
-- Let `Z` be a minimal set of prime ideals such that their product is contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z₀, hZ₀⟩ := PrimeSpectrum.exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain hNF hI0
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZI, hprodZ⟩, h_eraseZ⟩ :=
wellFounded_lt.has_min
{Z | (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧ (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥}
⟨Z₀, hZ₀.1, hZ₀.2⟩
obtain ⟨_, hPZ', hPM⟩ := hM.isPrime.multiset_prod_le.mp (hZI.trans hIM)
-- Then in fact there is a `P ∈ Z` with `P ≤ M`.
obtain ⟨P, hPZ, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hPZ'
classical
have := Multiset.map_erase PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal PrimeSpectrum.ext P Z
obtain ⟨hP0, hZP0⟩ : P.asIdeal ≠ ⊥ ∧ ((Z.erase P).map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥ := by
rwa [Ne, ← Multiset.cons_erase hPZ', Multiset.prod_cons, Ideal.mul_eq_bot, not_or, ←
this] at hprodZ
-- By maximality of `P` and `M`, we have that `P ≤ M` implies `P = M`.
have hPM' := (P.IsPrime.isMaximal hP0).eq_of_le hM.ne_top hPM
subst hPM'
-- By minimality of `Z`, erasing `P` from `Z` is exactly what we need.
refine ⟨Z.erase P, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert hZI
rw [this, Multiset.cons_erase hPZ']
· refine fun h => h_eraseZ (Z.erase P) ⟨h, ?_⟩ (Multiset.erase_lt.mpr hPZ)
exact hZP0
#align exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
lemma not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A}
(hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ¬(I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) ≤ 1 := by
have hNF : ¬IsField A := fun h ↦ letI := h.toField; (eq_bot_or_eq_top I).elim hI0 hI1
wlog hM : I.IsMaximal generalizing I
· rcases I.exists_le_maximal hI1 with ⟨M, hmax, hIM⟩
have hMbot : M ≠ ⊥ := (M.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF).ne'
refine mt (le_trans <| inv_anti_mono ?_ ?_ ?_) (this hMbot hmax.ne_top hmax) <;>
simpa only [coeIdeal_ne_zero, coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal]
have hI0 : ⊥ < I := I.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF
obtain ⟨⟨a, haI⟩, ha0⟩ := Submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt hI0
replace ha0 : a ≠ 0 := Subtype.coe_injective.ne ha0
let J : Ideal A := Ideal.span {a}
have hJ0 : J ≠ ⊥ := mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp ha0
have hJI : J ≤ I := I.span_singleton_le_iff_mem.2 haI
-- Then we can find a product of prime (hence maximal) ideals contained in `J`,
-- such that removing element `M` from the product is not contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z, hle, hnle⟩ := exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le hNF hJ0 hJI
-- Choose an element `b` of the product that is not in `J`.
obtain ⟨b, hbZ, hbJ⟩ := SetLike.not_le_iff_exists.mp hnle
have hnz_fa : algebraMap A K a ≠ 0 :=
mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) a) ha0
-- Then `b a⁻¹ : K` is in `M⁻¹` but not in `1`.
refine Set.not_subset.2 ⟨algebraMap A K b * (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹, (mem_inv_iff ?_).mpr ?_, ?_⟩
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0.ne'
· rintro y₀ hy₀
obtain ⟨y, h_Iy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp hy₀
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul]
have h_yb : y * b ∈ J := by
apply hle
rw [Multiset.prod_cons]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul h_Iy hbZ
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton'] at h_yb
rcases h_yb with ⟨c, hc⟩
rw [← hc, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hnz_fa, mul_one]
apply coe_mem_one
· refine mt (mem_one_iff _).mp ?_
rintro ⟨x', h₂_abs⟩
rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, eq_div_iff_mul_eq hnz_fa, ← RingHom.map_mul] at h₂_abs
have := Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨x', IsFractionRing.injective A K h₂_abs⟩
contradiction
theorem exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ∃ x ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x ∉ (1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :=
Set.not_subset.1 <| not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot hI0 hI1
#align fractional_ideal.exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot FractionalIdeal.exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot
theorem mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one [h : IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI : (I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1) : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show a contradiction with `exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot`:
-- `J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹` cannot have an element `x ∉ 1`, so it must equal `1`.
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ : ∃ J : Ideal A, (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) = I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp mul_one_div_le_one
by_cases hJ0 : J = ⊥
· subst hJ0
refine absurd ?_ hI0
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K, hJ]
exact coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv K I
by_cases hJ1 : J = ⊤
· rw [← hJ, hJ1, coeIdeal_top]
exact (not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot (K := K) hJ0 hJ1 (hJ ▸ hI)).elim
#align fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one
/-- Nonzero integral ideals in a Dedekind domain are invertible.
We will use this to show that nonzero fractional ideals are invertible,
and finally conclude that fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain form a group with zero.
-/
theorem coe_ideal_mul_inv [h : IsDedekindDomain A] (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) :
I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show `1 ≤ J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1`.
apply mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one hI0
by_cases hJ0 : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0
· rw [hJ0, inv_zero']; exact zero_le _
intro x hx
-- In particular, we'll show all `x ∈ J⁻¹` are integral.
suffices x ∈ integralClosure A K by
rwa [IsIntegrallyClosed.integralClosure_eq_bot, Algebra.mem_bot, Set.mem_range,
← mem_one_iff] at this
-- For that, we'll find a subalgebra that is f.g. as a module and contains `x`.
-- `A` is a noetherian ring, so we just need to find a subalgebra between `{x}` and `I⁻¹`.
rw [mem_integralClosure_iff_mem_fg]
have x_mul_mem : ∀ b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x * b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
intro b hb
rw [mem_inv_iff (coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0)]
dsimp only at hx
rw [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ0] at hx
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_comm b] at hx ⊢
intro y hy
exact hx _ (mul_mem_mul hy hb)
-- It turns out the subalgebra consisting of all `p(x)` for `p : A[X]` works.
refine ⟨AlgHom.range (Polynomial.aeval x : A[X] →ₐ[A] K),
isNoetherian_submodule.mp (isNoetherian (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) _ fun y hy => ?_,
⟨Polynomial.X, Polynomial.aeval_X x⟩⟩
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := (AlgHom.mem_range _).mp hy
rw [Polynomial.aeval_eq_sum_range]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => Submodule.smul_mem _ _ ?_
clear hi
induction' i with i ih
· rw [pow_zero]; exact one_mem_inv_coe_ideal hI0
· show x ^ i.succ ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)
rw [pow_succ']; exact x_mul_mem _ ih
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_mul_inv
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain are units.
This is also available as `_root_.mul_inv_cancel`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hne : I ≠ 0) :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, hJ⟩ :
∃ (a : A) (aI : Ideal A), a ≠ 0 ∧ I = spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹ * aI :=
exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
suffices h₂ : I * (spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) = 1 by
rw [mul_inv_cancel_iff]
exact ⟨spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹, h₂⟩
subst hJ
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), coe_ideal_mul_inv, mul_one,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, inv_mul_cancel, spanSingleton_one]
· exact mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap A K)).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) _) ha
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mp (right_ne_zero_of_mul hne)
#align fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel
theorem mul_right_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
∀ {I I'}, I * J ≤ I' * J ↔ I ≤ I' := by
intro I I'
constructor
· intro h
convert mul_right_mono J⁻¹ h <;> dsimp only <;>
rw [mul_assoc, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
· exact fun h => mul_right_mono J h
#align fractional_ideal.mul_right_le_iff FractionalIdeal.mul_right_le_iff
theorem mul_left_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) {I I'} :
J * I ≤ J * I' ↔ I ≤ I' := by convert mul_right_le_iff hJ using 1; simp only [mul_comm]
#align fractional_ideal.mul_left_le_iff FractionalIdeal.mul_left_le_iff
theorem mul_right_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (· * I) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_right_le_iff hI).symm
#align fractional_ideal.mul_right_strict_mono FractionalIdeal.mul_right_strictMono
theorem mul_left_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (I * ·) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_left_le_iff hI).symm
#align fractional_ideal.mul_left_strict_mono FractionalIdeal.mul_left_strictMono
/-- This is also available as `_root_.div_eq_mul_inv`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem div_eq_mul_inv [IsDedekindDomain A] (I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :
I / J = I * J⁻¹ := by
by_cases hJ : J = 0
· rw [hJ, div_zero, inv_zero', mul_zero]
refine le_antisymm ((mul_right_le_iff hJ).mp ?_) ((le_div_iff_mul_le hJ).mpr ?_)
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one, mul_le]
intro x hx y hy
rw [mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ] at hx
exact hx y hy
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
#align fractional_ideal.div_eq_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.div_eq_mul_inv
end FractionalIdeal
/-- `IsDedekindDomain` and `IsDedekindDomainInv` are equivalent ways
to express that an integral domain is a Dedekind domain. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv [IsDomain A] :
IsDedekindDomain A ↔ IsDedekindDomainInv A :=
⟨fun _h _I hI => FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hI, fun h => h.isDedekindDomain⟩
#align is_dedekind_domain_iff_is_dedekind_domain_inv isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv
end Inverse
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
open FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
noncomputable instance FractionalIdeal.semifield : Semifield (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ := coeIdeal_injective.nontrivial
inv_zero := inv_zero' _
div_eq_mul_inv := FractionalIdeal.div_eq_mul_inv
mul_inv_cancel _ := FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel
nnqsmul := _
#align fractional_ideal.semifield FractionalIdeal.semifield
/-- Fractional ideals have cancellative multiplication in a Dedekind domain.
Although this instance is a direct consequence of the instance
`FractionalIdeal.semifield`, we define this instance to provide
a computable alternative.
-/
instance FractionalIdeal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero :
CancelCommMonoidWithZero (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ : CommSemiring (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := inferInstance
#align fractional_ideal.cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero FractionalIdeal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero
instance Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero : CancelCommMonoidWithZero (Ideal A) :=
{ Function.Injective.cancelCommMonoidWithZero (coeIdealHom A⁰ (FractionRing A)) coeIdeal_injective
(RingHom.map_zero _) (RingHom.map_one _) (RingHom.map_mul _) (RingHom.map_pow _) with }
#align ideal.cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero
-- Porting note: Lean can infer all it needs by itself
instance Ideal.isDomain : IsDomain (Ideal A) := { }
#align ideal.is_domain Ideal.isDomain
/-- For ideals in a Dedekind domain, to divide is to contain. -/
theorem Ideal.dvd_iff_le {I J : Ideal A} : I ∣ J ↔ J ≤ I :=
⟨Ideal.le_of_dvd, fun h => by
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· have hJ : J = ⊥ := by rwa [hI, ← eq_bot_iff] at h
rw [hI, hJ]
have hI' : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
have : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * J ≤ 1 :=
le_trans (mul_left_mono (↑I)⁻¹ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal _).mpr h))
(le_of_eq (inv_mul_cancel hI'))
obtain ⟨H, hH⟩ := le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp this
use H
refine coeIdeal_injective (show (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = ↑(I * H) from ?_)
rw [coeIdeal_mul, hH, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hI', one_mul]⟩
#align ideal.dvd_iff_le Ideal.dvd_iff_le
theorem Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt {I J : Ideal A} : DvdNotUnit I J ↔ J < I :=
⟨fun ⟨hI, H, hunit, hmul⟩ =>
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp ⟨H, hmul⟩)
(mt
(fun h =>
have : H = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hI (by rw [← hmul, h, mul_one])
show IsUnit H from this.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
hunit),
fun h =>
dvdNotUnit_of_dvd_of_not_dvd (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr (le_of_lt h))
(mt Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt h))⟩
#align ideal.dvd_not_unit_iff_lt Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt
instance : WfDvdMonoid (Ideal A) where
wellFounded_dvdNotUnit := by
have : WellFounded ((· > ·) : Ideal A → Ideal A → Prop) :=
isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.mp (isNoetherianRing_iff.mp IsDedekindRing.toIsNoetherian)
convert this
ext
rw [Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt]
instance Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ irreducible_iff_prime := by
intro P
exact ⟨fun hirr => ⟨hirr.ne_zero, hirr.not_unit, fun I J => by
have : P.IsMaximal := by
refine ⟨⟨mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mpr hirr.not_unit, ?_⟩⟩
intro J hJ
obtain ⟨_J_ne, H, hunit, P_eq⟩ := Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mpr hJ
exact Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp ((hirr.isUnit_or_isUnit P_eq).resolve_right hunit)
rw [Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, SetLike.le_def, SetLike.le_def,
SetLike.le_def]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨x, x_mem, x_not_mem⟩, ⟨y, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩⟩
exact
⟨x * y, Ideal.mul_mem_mul x_mem y_mem,
mt this.isPrime.mem_or_mem (not_or_of_not x_not_mem y_not_mem)⟩⟩, Prime.irreducible⟩ }
#align ideal.unique_factorization_monoid Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid
instance Ideal.normalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid (Ideal A) :=
normalizationMonoidOfUniqueUnits
#align ideal.normalization_monoid Ideal.normalizationMonoid
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.dvd_span_singleton {I : Ideal A} {x : A} : I ∣ Ideal.span {x} ↔ x ∈ I :=
Ideal.dvd_iff_le.trans (Ideal.span_le.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff)
#align ideal.dvd_span_singleton Ideal.dvd_span_singleton
theorem Ideal.isPrime_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) : IsPrime P := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hxy => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
rw [← Ideal.one_eq_top] at h
exact h.not_unit isUnit_one
· simp only [← Ideal.dvd_span_singleton, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at hxy ⊢
exact h.dvd_or_dvd hxy
#align ideal.is_prime_of_prime Ideal.isPrime_of_prime
theorem Ideal.prime_of_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (h : IsPrime P) : Prime P := by
refine ⟨hP, mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp h.ne_top, fun I J hIJ => ?_⟩
simpa only [Ideal.dvd_iff_le] using h.mul_le.mp (Ideal.le_of_dvd hIJ)
#align ideal.prime_of_is_prime Ideal.prime_of_isPrime
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the (nonzero) prime elements of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`
are exactly the prime ideals. -/
theorem Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) : Prime P ↔ IsPrime P :=
⟨Ideal.isPrime_of_prime, Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP⟩
#align ideal.prime_iff_is_prime Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the prime ideals are the zero ideal together with the prime elements
of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`. -/
theorem Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime {P : Ideal A} : IsPrime P ↔ P = ⊥ ∨ Prime P :=
⟨fun hp => (eq_or_ne P ⊥).imp_right fun hp0 => Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hp0 hp, fun hp =>
hp.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ Ideal.bot_prime) Ideal.isPrime_of_prime⟩
#align ideal.is_prime_iff_bot_or_prime Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.prime_span_singleton_iff {a : A} : Prime (Ideal.span {a}) ↔ Prime a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· rw [Set.singleton_zero, span_zero, ← Ideal.zero_eq_bot, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_prime_zero, not_false_eq_true]
· have ha' : span {a} ≠ ⊥ := by simpa only [ne_eq, span_singleton_eq_bot] using ha
rw [Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime ha', Ideal.span_singleton_prime ha]
open Submodule.IsPrincipal in
theorem Ideal.prime_generator_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) [P.IsPrincipal] :
Prime (generator P) :=
have : Ideal.IsPrime P := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime h
prime_generator_of_isPrime _ h.ne_zero
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid in
nonrec theorem Ideal.mem_normalizedFactors_iff {p I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
p ∈ normalizedFactors I ↔ p.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p := by
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le]
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [← zero_eq_bot] at hI
simp only [hp, zero_not_mem_normalizedFactors, zero_dvd_iff, hI, false_iff, not_and,
not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
· rwa [mem_normalizedFactors_iff hI, prime_iff_isPrime]
theorem Ideal.pow_right_strictAnti (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) :
StrictAnti (I ^ · : ℕ → Ideal A) :=
strictAnti_nat_of_succ_lt fun e =>
Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mp ⟨pow_ne_zero _ hI0, I, mt isUnit_iff.mp hI1, pow_succ I e⟩
#align ideal.strict_anti_pow Ideal.pow_right_strictAnti
theorem Ideal.pow_lt_self (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) (he : 2 ≤ e) :
I ^ e < I := by
convert I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 he
dsimp only
rw [pow_one]
#align ideal.pow_lt_self Ideal.pow_lt_self
theorem Ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) :
∃ x ∈ I ^ e, x ∉ I ^ (e + 1) :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 e.lt_succ_self)
#align ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ Ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem Ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le {P I : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥)
{i : ℕ} (hlt : P ^ (i + 1) < I) (hle : I ≤ P ^ i) : I = P ^ i := by
refine le_antisymm hle ?_
have P_prime' := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP P_prime
have h1 : I ≠ ⊥ := (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le hlt).ne'
have := pow_ne_zero i hP
have h3 := pow_ne_zero (i + 1) hP
rw [← Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt, dvdNotUnit_iff_normalizedFactors_lt_normalizedFactors h1 h3,
normalizedFactors_pow, normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible,
Multiset.nsmul_singleton, Multiset.lt_replicate_succ] at hlt
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_pow,
normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
all_goals assumption
#align ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le Ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le
theorem Ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow {P : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (i : ℕ) :
P ^ (i + 1) < P ^ i :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.le_succ _))
(mt (pow_eq_pow_iff hP (mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp P_prime.ne_top)).mp i.succ_ne_self)
#align ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow Ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow
theorem Associates.le_singleton_iff (x : A) (n : ℕ) (I : Ideal A) :
Associates.mk I ^ n ≤ Associates.mk (Ideal.span {x}) ↔ x ∈ I ^ n := by
simp_rw [← Associates.dvd_eq_le, ← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk,
Ideal.dvd_span_singleton]
#align associates.le_singleton_iff Associates.le_singleton_iff
variable {K}
lemma FractionalIdeal.le_inv_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J⁻¹ ↔ J ≤ I⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, inv_eq, le_div_iff_mul_le hI, le_div_iff_mul_le hJ, mul_comm]
lemma FractionalIdeal.inv_le_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I⁻¹ ≤ J ↔ J⁻¹ ≤ I := by
simpa using le_inv_comm (A := A) (K := K) (inv_ne_zero hI) (inv_ne_zero hJ)
open FractionalIdeal
/-- Strengthening of `IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples`:
Let `J ≠ ⊤` be an ideal in a Dedekind domain `A`, and `f ≠ 0` a finite collection
of elements of `K = Frac(A)`, then we can multiply the elements of `f` by some `a : K`
to find a collection of elements of `A` that is not completely contained in `J`. -/
theorem Ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem {J : Ideal A} (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
(f : ι → K) {j} (hjs : j ∈ s) (hjf : f j ≠ 0) :
∃ a : K,
(∀ i ∈ s, IsLocalization.IsInteger A (a * f i)) ∧
∃ i ∈ s, a * f i ∉ (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
-- Consider the fractional ideal `I` spanned by the `f`s.
let I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K := spanFinset A s f
have hI0 : I ≠ 0 := spanFinset_ne_zero.mpr ⟨j, hjs, hjf⟩
-- We claim the multiplier `a` we're looking for is in `I⁻¹ \ (J / I)`.
suffices ↑J / I < I⁻¹ by
obtain ⟨_, a, hI, hpI⟩ := SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp this
rw [mem_inv_iff hI0] at hI
refine ⟨a, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
-- By definition, `a ∈ I⁻¹` multiplies elements of `I` into elements of `1`,
-- in other words, `a * f i` is an integer.
· exact (mem_one_iff _).mp (hI (f i) (Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_image_of_mem f hi)))
· contrapose! hpI
-- And if all `a`-multiples of `I` are an element of `J`,
-- then `a` is actually an element of `J / I`, contradiction.
refine (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI0).mpr fun y hy => Submodule.span_induction hy ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; exact hpI i hi
· rw [mul_zero]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro x y hx hy; rw [mul_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy
· intro b x hx; rw [mul_smul_comm]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ b hx
-- To show the inclusion of `J / I` into `I⁻¹ = 1 / I`, note that `J < I`.
calc
↑J / I = ↑J * I⁻¹ := div_eq_mul_inv (↑J) I
_ < 1 * I⁻¹ := mul_right_strictMono (inv_ne_zero hI0) ?_
_ = I⁻¹ := one_mul _
rw [← coeIdeal_top]
-- And multiplying by `I⁻¹` is indeed strictly monotone.
exact
strictMono_of_le_iff_le (fun _ _ => (coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K).symm)
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hJ)
#align ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem Ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem
section Gcd
namespace Ideal
/-! ### GCD and LCM of ideals in a Dedekind domain
We show that the gcd of two ideals in a Dedekind domain is just their supremum,
and the lcm is their infimum, and use this to instantiate `NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_inf (I J : Ideal A) : (I ⊔ J) * (I ⊓ J) = I * J := by
letI := UniqueFactorizationMonoid.toNormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)
have hgcd : gcd I J = I ⊔ J := by
rw [gcd_eq_normalize _ _, normalize_eq]
· rw [dvd_iff_le, sup_le_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
exact ⟨gcd_dvd_left _ _, gcd_dvd_right _ _⟩
· rw [dvd_gcd_iff, dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le]
simp
have hlcm : lcm I J = I ⊓ J := by
rw [lcm_eq_normalize _ _, normalize_eq]
· rw [lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le]
simp
· rw [dvd_iff_le, le_inf_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
exact ⟨dvd_lcm_left _ _, dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩
rw [← hgcd, ← hlcm, associated_iff_eq.mp (gcd_mul_lcm _ _)]
#align ideal.sup_mul_inf Ideal.sup_mul_inf
/-- Ideals in a Dedekind domain have gcd and lcm operators that (trivially) are compatible with
the normalization operator. -/
instance : NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ Ideal.normalizationMonoid with
gcd := (· ⊔ ·)
gcd_dvd_left := fun _ _ => by simpa only [dvd_iff_le] using le_sup_left
gcd_dvd_right := fun _ _ => by simpa only [dvd_iff_le] using le_sup_right
dvd_gcd := by
simp only [dvd_iff_le]
exact fun h1 h2 => @sup_le (Ideal A) _ _ _ _ h1 h2
lcm := (· ⊓ ·)
lcm_zero_left := fun _ => by simp only [zero_eq_bot, bot_inf_eq]
lcm_zero_right := fun _ => by simp only [zero_eq_bot, inf_bot_eq]
gcd_mul_lcm := fun _ _ => by rw [associated_iff_eq, sup_mul_inf]
normalize_gcd := fun _ _ => normalize_eq _
normalize_lcm := fun _ _ => normalize_eq _ }
-- In fact, any lawful gcd and lcm would equal sup and inf respectively.
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_sup (I J : Ideal A) : gcd I J = I ⊔ J := rfl
#align ideal.gcd_eq_sup Ideal.gcd_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem lcm_eq_inf (I J : Ideal A) : lcm I J = I ⊓ J := rfl
#align ideal.lcm_eq_inf Ideal.lcm_eq_inf
theorem isCoprime_iff_gcd {I J : Ideal A} : IsCoprime I J ↔ gcd I J = 1 := by
rw [Ideal.isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, one_eq_top, gcd_eq_sup]
theorem factors_span_eq {p : K[X]} : factors (span {p}) = (factors p).map (fun q ↦ span {q}) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with rfl | hp; · simpa [Set.singleton_zero] using normalizedFactors_zero
have : ∀ q ∈ (factors p).map (fun q ↦ span {q}), Prime q := fun q hq ↦ by
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hq
exact prime_span_singleton_iff.mpr <| prime_of_factor r hr
rw [← span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr (factors_prod hp), ← multiset_prod_span_singleton,
factors_eq_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime this]
end Ideal
end Gcd
end IsDedekindDomain
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {T : Type*} [CommRing T] [IsDedekindDomain T] {I J : Ideal T}
open scoped Classical
open Multiset UniqueFactorizationMonoid Ideal
theorem prod_normalizedFactors_eq_self (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : (normalizedFactors I).prod = I :=
associated_iff_eq.1 (normalizedFactors_prod hI)
#align prod_normalized_factors_eq_self prod_normalizedFactors_eq_self
theorem count_le_of_ideal_ge {I J : Ideal T} (h : I ≤ J) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (K : Ideal T) :
count K (normalizedFactors J) ≤ count K (normalizedFactors I) :=
le_iff_count.1 ((dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI h) hI).1
(dvd_iff_le.2 h))
_
#align count_le_of_ideal_ge count_le_of_ideal_ge
theorem sup_eq_prod_inf_factors (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
I ⊔ J = (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J).prod := by
have H : normalizedFactors (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J).prod =
normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J := by
apply normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime
intro p hp
rw [mem_inter] at hp
exact prime_of_normalized_factor p hp.left
have := Multiset.prod_ne_zero_of_prime (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J) fun _ h =>
prime_of_normalized_factor _ (Multiset.mem_inter.1 h).1
apply le_antisymm
· rw [sup_le_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
constructor
· rw [dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors this hI, H]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors this hJ, H]
exact inf_le_right
· rw [← dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors,
normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime, le_iff_count]
· intro a
rw [Multiset.count_inter]
exact le_min (count_le_of_ideal_ge le_sup_left hI a) (count_le_of_ideal_ge le_sup_right hJ a)
· intro p hp
rw [mem_inter] at hp
exact prime_of_normalized_factor p hp.left
· exact ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI le_sup_left
· exact this
#align sup_eq_prod_inf_factors sup_eq_prod_inf_factors
theorem irreducible_pow_sup (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ) :
J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ min ((normalizedFactors I).count J) n := by
rw [sup_eq_prod_inf_factors (pow_ne_zero n hJ.ne_zero) hI, min_comm,
normalizedFactors_of_irreducible_pow hJ, normalize_eq J, replicate_inter, prod_replicate]
#align irreducible_pow_sup irreducible_pow_sup
theorem irreducible_pow_sup_of_le (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ) (hn : ↑n ≤ multiplicity J I) :
J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ n := by
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· simp_all
rw [irreducible_pow_sup hI hJ, min_eq_right]
rwa [multiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, PartENat.coe_le_coe, normalize_eq J] at hn
#align irreducible_pow_sup_of_le irreducible_pow_sup_of_le
theorem irreducible_pow_sup_of_ge (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ)
(hn : multiplicity J I ≤ n) :
J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ (multiplicity J I).get (PartENat.dom_of_le_natCast hn) := by
rw [irreducible_pow_sup hI hJ, min_eq_left]
· congr
rw [← PartENat.natCast_inj, PartENat.natCast_get,
multiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, normalize_eq J]
· rwa [multiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, PartENat.coe_le_coe, normalize_eq J] at hn
#align irreducible_pow_sup_of_ge irreducible_pow_sup_of_ge
end IsDedekindDomain
/-!
### Height one spectrum of a Dedekind domain
If `R` is a Dedekind domain of Krull dimension 1, the maximal ideals of `R` are exactly its nonzero
prime ideals.
We define `HeightOneSpectrum` and provide lemmas to recover the facts that prime ideals of height
one are prime and irreducible.
-/
namespace IsDedekindDomain
variable [IsDedekindDomain R]
/-- The height one prime spectrum of a Dedekind domain `R` is the type of nonzero prime ideals of
`R`. Note that this equals the maximal spectrum if `R` has Krull dimension 1. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): removed `has_nonempty_instance`, linter doesn't exist yet
@[ext, nolint unusedArguments]
structure HeightOneSpectrum where
asIdeal : Ideal R
isPrime : asIdeal.IsPrime
ne_bot : asIdeal ≠ ⊥
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
attribute [instance] HeightOneSpectrum.isPrime
variable (v : HeightOneSpectrum R) {R}
namespace HeightOneSpectrum
instance isMaximal : v.asIdeal.IsMaximal := v.isPrime.isMaximal v.ne_bot
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.is_maximal IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.isMaximal
theorem prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.prime IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.prime
theorem irreducible : Irreducible v.asIdeal :=
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.irreducible_iff_prime.mpr v.prime
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.irreducible IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.irreducible
theorem associates_irreducible : Irreducible <| Associates.mk v.asIdeal :=
Associates.irreducible_mk.mpr v.irreducible
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.associates_irreducible IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.associates_irreducible
/-- An equivalence between the height one and maximal spectra for rings of Krull dimension 1. -/
def equivMaximalSpectrum (hR : ¬IsField R) : HeightOneSpectrum R ≃ MaximalSpectrum R where
toFun v := ⟨v.asIdeal, v.isPrime.isMaximal v.ne_bot⟩
invFun v :=
⟨v.asIdeal, v.IsMaximal.isPrime, Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField v.IsMaximal hR⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.equiv_maximal_spectrum IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.equivMaximalSpectrum
variable (R)
/-- A Dedekind domain is equal to the intersection of its localizations at all its height one
non-zero prime ideals viewed as subalgebras of its field of fractions. -/
theorem iInf_localization_eq_bot [Algebra R K] [hK : IsFractionRing R K] :
(⨅ v : HeightOneSpectrum R,
Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ v.asIdeal.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors) = ⊥ := by
ext x
rw [Algebra.mem_iInf]
constructor
on_goal 1 => by_cases hR : IsField R
· rcases Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mp
(IsField.localization_map_bijective (Rₘ := K) (flip nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero rfl : 0 ∉ R⁰) hR)
with ⟨algebra_map_inv, _, algebra_map_right_inv⟩
exact fun _ => Algebra.mem_bot.mpr ⟨algebra_map_inv x, algebra_map_right_inv x⟩
all_goals rw [← MaximalSpectrum.iInf_localization_eq_bot, Algebra.mem_iInf]
· exact fun hx ⟨v, hv⟩ => hx ((equivMaximalSpectrum hR).symm ⟨v, hv⟩)
· exact fun hx ⟨v, hv, hbot⟩ => hx ⟨v, hv.isMaximal hbot⟩
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.infi_localization_eq_bot IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.iInf_localization_eq_bot
end HeightOneSpectrum
end IsDedekindDomain
section
open Ideal
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal R} {J : Ideal A}
/-- The map from ideals of `R` dividing `I` to the ideals of `A` dividing `J` induced by
a homomorphism `f : R/I →+* A/J` -/
@[simps] -- Porting note: use `Subtype` instead of `Set` to make linter happy
def idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{p : Ideal R // p ∣ I} →o {p : Ideal A // p ∣ J} where
toFun X := ⟨comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (map f (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X)), by
have : RingHom.ker (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) ≤
comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (map f (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X)) :=
ker_le_comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
rw [mk_ker] at this
exact dvd_iff_le.mpr this⟩
monotone' := by
rintro ⟨X, hX⟩ ⟨Y, hY⟩ h
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk] at h ⊢
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
Quotient.mk_surjective, map_le_iff_le_comap, Subtype.coe_mk, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf
(map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Y)]
suffices map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X ≤ map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Y by
exact le_sup_of_le_left this
rwa [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)
Quotient.mk_surjective, ← RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, mk_ker, sup_eq_left.mpr <| le_of_dvd hY]
#align ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom
#align ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_coe_coe idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_coe_coe
@[simp]
theorem idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id :
idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom (RingHom.id (A ⧸ J)).surjective = OrderHom.id :=
OrderHom.ext _ _
(funext fun X => by
simp only [idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, map_id, OrderHom.coe_mk, OrderHom.id_coe, id,
comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) Quotient.mk_surjective, ←
RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot (Ideal.Quotient.mk J), mk_ker,
sup_eq_left.mpr (dvd_iff_le.mp X.prop), Subtype.coe_eta])
#align ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_id idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id
variable {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [IsDedekindDomain B] {L : Ideal B}
theorem idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} {g : A ⧸ J →+* B ⧸ L}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
(idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom hg).comp (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom hf) =
idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom (show Function.Surjective (g.comp f) from hg.comp hf) := by
refine OrderHom.ext _ _ (funext fun x => ?_)
rw [idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, OrderHom.comp_coe, OrderHom.coe_mk,
OrderHom.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, OrderHom.coe_mk,
Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, map_comap_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
Quotient.mk_surjective, map_map]
#align ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_comp idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (f : R ⧸ I ≃+* A ⧸ J)
/-- The bijection between ideals of `R` dividing `I` and the ideals of `A` dividing `J` induced by
an isomorphism `f : R/I ≅ A/J`. -/
-- @[simps] -- Porting note: simpNF complains about the lemmas generated by simps
def idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv : { p : Ideal R | p ∣ I } ≃o { p : Ideal A | p ∣ J } := by
have f_surj : Function.Surjective (f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J) := f.surjective
have fsym_surj : Function.Surjective (f.symm : A ⧸ J →+* R ⧸ I) := f.symm.surjective
refine OrderIso.ofHomInv (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom f_surj) (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom fsym_surj)
?_ ?_
· have := idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp fsym_surj f_surj
simp only [RingEquiv.comp_symm, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id] at this
rw [← this, OrderHom.coe_eq, OrderHom.coe_eq]
· have := idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp f_surj fsym_surj
simp only [RingEquiv.symm_comp, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id] at this
rw [← this, OrderHom.coe_eq, OrderHom.coe_eq]
#align ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm :
(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).symm = idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f.symm := rfl
#align ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_symm idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso {L M : Ideal R} (hL : L ∣ I) (hM : M ∣ I) :
(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ : Ideal A) ∣ idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ↔
L ∣ M := by
suffices
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ≤ idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ ↔
(⟨M, hM⟩ : { p : Ideal R | p ∣ I }) ≤ ⟨L, hL⟩
by rw [dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le, Subtype.coe_le_coe, this, Subtype.mk_le_mk]
exact (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).le_iff_le
#align ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_is_dvd_iso idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
variable [DecidableEq (Ideal R)] [DecidableEq (Ideal A)]
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
{L : Ideal R} (hL : L ∈ normalizedFactors I) :
↑(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors hL⟩)
∈ normalizedFactors J := by
have hI : I ≠ ⊥ := by
intro hI
rw [hI, bot_eq_zero, normalizedFactors_zero, ← Multiset.empty_eq_zero] at hL
exact Finset.not_mem_empty _ hL
refine mem_normalizedFactors_factor_dvd_iso_of_mem_normalizedFactors hI hJ hL
(d := (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).toEquiv) ?_
rintro ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
apply idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso f
#align ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_mem_normalized_factors_of_mem_normalized_factors idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors
/-- The bijection between the sets of normalized factors of I and J induced by a ring
isomorphism `f : R/I ≅ A/J`. -/
-- @[simps apply] -- Porting note: simpNF complains about the lemmas generated by simps
def normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
{ L : Ideal R | L ∈ normalizedFactors I } ≃ { M : Ideal A | M ∈ normalizedFactors J } where
toFun j :=
⟨idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors j.prop⟩,
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors f hJ j.prop⟩
invFun j :=
⟨(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).symm ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors j.prop⟩, by
rw [idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm]
exact
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors f.symm hI
j.prop⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => by
simp
-- This used to be the end of the proof before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]
#align normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv
@[simp]
theorem normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
(normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f hI hJ).symm =
normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f.symm hJ hI := rfl
#align normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_symm normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm
variable [DecidableRel ((· ∣ ·) : Ideal R → Ideal R → Prop)]
variable [DecidableRel ((· ∣ ·) : Ideal A → Ideal A → Prop)]
/-- The map `normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv` preserves multiplicities. -/
theorem normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_multiplicity_eq_multiplicity (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
(L : Ideal R) (hL : L ∈ normalizedFactors I) :
multiplicity (↑(normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f hI hJ ⟨L, hL⟩)) J = multiplicity L I := by
rw [normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
refine multiplicity_factor_dvd_iso_eq_multiplicity_of_mem_normalizedFactors hI hJ hL
(d := (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).toEquiv) ?_
exact fun ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩ => idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso f hl hl'
#align normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_multiplicity_eq_multiplicity normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_multiplicity_eq_multiplicity
end
section ChineseRemainder
open Ideal UniqueFactorizationMonoid
variable {R}
theorem Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq [Ring.DimensionLEOne R] {P Q : Ideal R}
[hP : P.IsPrime] [hQ : Q.IsPrime] (hP0 : P ≠ ⊥) : P ≤ Q ↔ P = Q :=
⟨(hP.isMaximal hP0).eq_of_le hQ.ne_top, Eq.le⟩
#align ring.dimension_le_one.prime_le_prime_iff_eq Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq
theorem Ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge {I J : Ideal R} (h : ∀ P, I ≤ P → J ≤ P → ¬IsPrime P) :
IsCoprime I J := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_sup_eq]
by_contra hIJ
obtain ⟨P, hP, hIJ⟩ := Ideal.exists_le_maximal _ hIJ
exact h P (le_trans le_sup_left hIJ) (le_trans le_sup_right hIJ) hP.isPrime
#align ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge Ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge
section DedekindDomain
variable [IsDedekindDomain R]
theorem Ideal.IsPrime.mul_mem_pow (I : Ideal R) [hI : I.IsPrime] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : a * b ∈ I ^ n) : a ∈ I ∨ b ∈ I ^ n := by
cases n; · simp
by_cases hI0 : I = ⊥; · simpa [pow_succ, hI0] using h
simp only [← Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, Ideal.submodule_span_eq, ← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at h ⊢
by_cases ha : I ∣ span {a}
· exact Or.inl ha
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact Or.inr (Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ((Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime hI0).mpr hI) _ ha h)
#align ideal.is_prime.mul_mem_pow Ideal.IsPrime.mul_mem_pow
theorem Ideal.IsPrime.mem_pow_mul (I : Ideal R) [hI : I.IsPrime] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : a * b ∈ I ^ n) : a ∈ I ^ n ∨ b ∈ I := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
rw [or_comm]
exact Ideal.IsPrime.mul_mem_pow _ h
section
theorem Ideal.count_normalizedFactors_eq {p x : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsPrime] {n : ℕ} (hle : x ≤ p ^ n)
[DecidableEq (Ideal R)] (hlt : ¬x ≤ p ^ (n + 1)) : (normalizedFactors x).count p = n :=
count_normalizedFactors_eq' ((Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime.mp hp).imp_right Prime.irreducible)
(normalize_eq _) (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr hle) (mt Ideal.le_of_dvd hlt)
#align ideal.count_normalized_factors_eq Ideal.count_normalizedFactors_eq
end
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 1,250 | 1,259 | theorem Ideal.le_mul_of_no_prime_factors {I J K : Ideal R}
(coprime : ∀ P, J ≤ P → K ≤ P → ¬IsPrime P) (hJ : I ≤ J) (hK : I ≤ K) : I ≤ J * K := by |
simp only [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le] at coprime hJ hK ⊢
by_cases hJ0 : J = 0
· simpa only [hJ0, zero_mul] using hJ
obtain ⟨I', rfl⟩ := hK
rw [mul_comm]
refine mul_dvd_mul_left K
(UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors (b := K) hJ0 ?_ hJ)
exact fun hPJ hPK => mt Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (coprime _ hPJ hPK)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Results about division in extended non-negative reals
This file establishes basic properties related to the inversion and division operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
For instance, as a consequence of being a `DivInvOneMonoid`, `ℝ≥0∞` inherits a power operation
with integer exponent.
## Main results
A few order isomorphisms are worthy of mention:
- `OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ`: The map `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an order isomorphism to the dual.
- `orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)`: The birational order isomorphism between
`ℝ≥0∞` and the unit interval `Set.Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` given by `x ↦ (x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹` with inverse
`x ↦ (x⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹`
- `orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a`: Order isomorphism between an initial
interval in `ℝ≥0∞` and an initial interval in `ℝ≥0` given by the identity map.
- `orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`: An order isomorphism between
the extended nonnegative real numbers and the unit interval. This is `orderIsoIicOneBirational`
composed with the identity order isomorphism between `Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` and `Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`.
-/
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
#align ennreal.div_eq_inv_mul ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
#align ennreal.inv_zero ENNReal.inv_zero
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
#align ennreal.inv_top ENNReal.inv_top
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
#align ennreal.coe_inv_le ENNReal.coe_inv_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr, coe_one]
#align ennreal.coe_inv ENNReal.coe_inv
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
#align ennreal.coe_inv_two ENNReal.coe_inv_two
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
#align ennreal.coe_div ENNReal.coe_div
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
#align ennreal.div_zero ENNReal.div_zero
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
#align ennreal.inv_pow ENNReal.inv_pow
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel h0
#align ennreal.mul_inv_cancel ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
#align ennreal.inv_mul_cancel ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel
protected theorem div_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : b / a * a = b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h0 hI, mul_one]
#align ennreal.div_mul_cancel ENNReal.div_mul_cancel
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel h0 hI]
#align ennreal.mul_div_cancel' ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'
-- Porting note: `simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc]` doesn't work in the following two
protected theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm, ← mul_assoc]
#align ennreal.mul_comm_div ENNReal.mul_comm_div
protected theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm]
#align ennreal.mul_div_right_comm ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm
instance : InvolutiveInv ℝ≥0∞ where
inv_inv a := by
by_cases a = 0 <;> cases a <;> simp_all [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← inv_inj, inv_inv, inv_one]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 := inv_zero ▸ inv_inj
#align ennreal.inv_eq_top ENNReal.inv_eq_top
theorem inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
#align ennreal.inv_ne_top ENNReal.inv_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align ennreal.inv_lt_top ENNReal.inv_lt_top
theorem div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ ∞) (h2 : y ≠ 0) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1 (inv_ne_top.mpr h2)
#align ennreal.div_lt_top ENNReal.div_lt_top
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_inj
#align ennreal.inv_eq_zero ENNReal.inv_eq_zero
protected theorem inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
#align ennreal.inv_ne_zero ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
protected theorem div_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : 0 < a / b :=
ENNReal.mul_pos ha <| ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 hb
#align ennreal.div_pos ENNReal.div_pos
protected theorem mul_inv {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
(a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
induction' b with b
· replace ha : a ≠ 0 := ha.neg_resolve_right rfl
simp [ha]
induction' a with a
· replace hb : b ≠ 0 := coe_ne_zero.1 (hb.neg_resolve_left rfl)
simp [hb]
by_cases h'a : a = 0
· simp only [h'a, top_mul, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zero_mul, Ne,
not_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
by_cases h'b : b = 0
· simp only [h'b, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, mul_top, Ne, not_false_iff,
mul_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← ENNReal.coe_inv, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'a, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'b, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
simp [h'a, h'b]
#align ennreal.mul_inv ENNReal.mul_inv
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inl hc) (Or.inl hc'), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', one_mul]
#align ennreal.mul_div_mul_left ENNReal.mul_div_mul_left
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inr hc') (Or.inr hc), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', mul_one]
#align ennreal.mul_div_mul_right ENNReal.mul_div_mul_right
protected theorem sub_div (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ 0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.sub_mul (by simpa using h)
#align ennreal.sub_div ENNReal.sub_div
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
#align ennreal.inv_pos ENNReal.inv_pos
theorem inv_strictAnti : StrictAnti (Inv.inv : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) := by
intro a b h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h.ne_top
induction b; · simp
rw [coe_lt_coe] at h
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha); · simp [h]
rw [← coe_inv h.ne_bot, ← coe_inv ha, coe_lt_coe]
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv ha h
#align ennreal.inv_strict_anti ENNReal.inv_strictAnti
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
inv_strictAnti.lt_iff_lt
#align ennreal.inv_lt_inv ENNReal.inv_lt_inv
theorem inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
#align ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt ENNReal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt
theorem lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
#align ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv ENNReal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
inv_strictAnti.le_iff_le
#align ennreal.inv_le_inv ENNReal.inv_le_inv
theorem inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
#align ennreal.inv_le_iff_inv_le ENNReal.inv_le_iff_inv_le
theorem le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
#align ennreal.le_inv_iff_le_inv ENNReal.le_inv_iff_le_inv
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_le_inv' (h : a ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
ENNReal.inv_strictAnti.antitone h
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_lt_inv' (h : a < b) : b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ := ENNReal.inv_strictAnti h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_one : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by rw [inv_le_iff_inv_le, inv_one]
#align ennreal.inv_le_one ENNReal.inv_le_one
protected theorem one_le_inv : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by rw [le_inv_iff_le_inv, inv_one]
#align ennreal.one_le_inv ENNReal.one_le_inv
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by rw [inv_lt_iff_inv_lt, inv_one]
#align ennreal.inv_lt_one ENNReal.inv_lt_one
@[simp]
protected theorem one_lt_inv : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by rw [lt_inv_iff_lt_inv, inv_one]
#align ennreal.one_lt_inv ENNReal.one_lt_inv
/-- The inverse map `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is an order isomorphism between `ℝ≥0∞` and its `OrderDual` -/
@[simps! apply]
def _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ where
map_rel_iff' := ENNReal.inv_le_inv
toEquiv := (Equiv.inv ℝ≥0∞).trans OrderDual.toDual
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal OrderIso.invENNReal
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal_apply OrderIso.invENNReal_apply
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply (a : ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ) :
OrderIso.invENNReal.symm a = (OrderDual.ofDual a)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal_symm_apply OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
#align ennreal.div_top ENNReal.div_top
-- Porting note: reordered 4 lemmas
theorem top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul']
#align ennreal.top_div ENNReal.top_div
theorem top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := by simp [top_div, h]
#align ennreal.top_div_of_ne_top ENNReal.top_div_of_ne_top
@[simp] theorem top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.top_div_coe ENNReal.top_div_coe
theorem top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
#align ennreal.top_div_of_lt_top ENNReal.top_div_of_lt_top
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
#align ennreal.zero_div ENNReal.zero_div
theorem div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0 ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_eq_top]
#align ennreal.div_eq_top ENNReal.div_eq_top
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
induction' b with b
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using ht.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [div_top, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha) <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· have hc : c ≠ 0 := h0.neg_resolve_left rfl
simp [div_zero hc]
· rw [← coe_ne_zero] at hb
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right hb coe_ne_top, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hb coe_ne_top]
#align ennreal.le_div_iff_mul_le ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le
protected theorem div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by
suffices a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹ by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le ?_ ?_).symm <;> simpa
#align ennreal.div_le_iff_le_mul ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
c < a / b ↔ c * b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul hb0 hbt)
#align ennreal.lt_div_iff_mul_lt ENNReal.lt_div_iff_mul_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b := by
by_cases h0 : c = 0
· have : a = 0 := by simpa [h0] using h
simp [*]
by_cases hinf : c = ∞; · simp [hinf]
exact (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inl h0) (Or.inl hinf)).2 h
#align ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem div_le_of_le_mul' (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
div_le_of_le_mul <| mul_comm b c ▸ h
#align ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul' ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul'
protected theorem div_self_le_one : a / a ≤ 1 := div_le_of_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
theorem mul_le_of_le_div (h : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b := by
rw [← inv_inv c]
exact div_le_of_le_mul h
#align ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div
theorem mul_le_of_le_div' (h : a ≤ b / c) : c * a ≤ b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_le_of_le_div h
#align ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div' ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div'
protected theorem div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) : c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
#align ennreal.div_lt_iff ENNReal.div_lt_iff
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b := by
contrapose! h
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul h
#align ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div' (h : a < b / c) : c * a < b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_lt_of_lt_div h
#align ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div' ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div'
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul (h : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
mul_lt_of_lt_div <| by rwa [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul' (h : a < b * c) : a / b < c :=
div_lt_of_lt_mul <| by rwa [mul_comm]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 358 | 360 | theorem inv_le_iff_le_mul (h₁ : b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b := by |
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
exacts [or_not_of_imp h₁, not_or_of_imp h₂]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 François G. Dorais. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: François G. Dorais, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Classes.Order
/-! ### UInt8 -/
@[ext] theorem UInt8.ext : {x y : UInt8} → x.toNat = y.toNat → x = y
| ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem UInt8.ext_iff {x y : UInt8} : x = y ↔ x.toNat = y.toNat := ⟨congrArg _, UInt8.ext⟩
@[simp] theorem UInt8.val_val_eq_toNat (x : UInt8) : x.val.val = x.toNat := rfl
theorem UInt8.toNat_lt (x : UInt8) : x.toNat < 2 ^ 8 := x.val.isLt
@[simp] theorem UInt8.toUInt16_toNat (x : UInt8) : x.toUInt16.toNat = x.toNat := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt8.toUInt32_toNat (x : UInt8) : x.toUInt32.toNat = x.toNat := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt8.toUInt64_toNat (x : UInt8) : x.toUInt64.toNat = x.toNat := rfl
theorem UInt8.le_antisymm_iff {x y : UInt8} : x = y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x :=
UInt8.ext_iff.trans Nat.le_antisymm_iff
theorem UInt8.le_antisymm {x y : UInt8} (h1 : x ≤ y) (h2 : y ≤ x) : x = y :=
UInt8.le_antisymm_iff.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩
instance : Batteries.LawfulOrd UInt8 := .compareOfLessAndEq
(fun _ => Nat.lt_irrefl _) Nat.lt_trans Nat.not_lt UInt8.le_antisymm
/-! ### UInt16 -/
@[ext] theorem UInt16.ext : {x y : UInt16} → x.toNat = y.toNat → x = y
| ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem UInt16.ext_iff {x y : UInt16} : x = y ↔ x.toNat = y.toNat := ⟨congrArg _, UInt16.ext⟩
theorem UInt16.toNat_lt (x : UInt16) : x.toNat < 2 ^ 16 := x.val.isLt
@[simp] theorem UInt16.val_val_eq_toNat (x : UInt16) : x.val.val = x.toNat := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt16.toUInt8_toNat (x : UInt16) : x.toUInt8.toNat = x.toNat % 2 ^ 8 := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt16.toUInt32_toNat (x : UInt16) : x.toUInt32.toNat = x.toNat := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt16.toUInt64_toNat (x : UInt16) : x.toUInt64.toNat = x.toNat := rfl
theorem UInt16.le_antisymm_iff {x y : UInt16} : x = y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x :=
UInt16.ext_iff.trans Nat.le_antisymm_iff
theorem UInt16.le_antisymm {x y : UInt16} (h1 : x ≤ y) (h2 : y ≤ x) : x = y :=
UInt16.le_antisymm_iff.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩
instance : Batteries.LawfulOrd UInt16 := .compareOfLessAndEq
(fun _ => Nat.lt_irrefl _) Nat.lt_trans Nat.not_lt UInt16.le_antisymm
/-! ### UInt32 -/
@[ext] theorem UInt32.ext : {x y : UInt32} → x.toNat = y.toNat → x = y
| ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem UInt32.ext_iff {x y : UInt32} : x = y ↔ x.toNat = y.toNat := ⟨congrArg _, UInt32.ext⟩
@[simp] theorem UInt32.val_val_eq_toNat (x : UInt32) : x.val.val = x.toNat := rfl
theorem UInt32.toNat_lt (x : UInt32) : x.toNat < 2 ^ 32 := x.val.isLt
@[simp] theorem UInt32.toUInt8_toNat (x : UInt32) : x.toUInt8.toNat = x.toNat % 2 ^ 8 := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt32.toUInt16_toNat (x : UInt32) : x.toUInt16.toNat = x.toNat % 2 ^ 16 := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt32.toUInt64_toNat (x : UInt32) : x.toUInt64.toNat = x.toNat := rfl
theorem UInt32.le_antisymm_iff {x y : UInt32} : x = y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x :=
UInt32.ext_iff.trans Nat.le_antisymm_iff
theorem UInt32.le_antisymm {x y : UInt32} (h1 : x ≤ y) (h2 : y ≤ x) : x = y :=
UInt32.le_antisymm_iff.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩
instance : Batteries.LawfulOrd UInt32 := .compareOfLessAndEq
(fun _ => Nat.lt_irrefl _) Nat.lt_trans Nat.not_lt UInt32.le_antisymm
/-! ### UInt64 -/
@[ext] theorem UInt64.ext : {x y : UInt64} → x.toNat = y.toNat → x = y
| ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem UInt64.ext_iff {x y : UInt64} : x = y ↔ x.toNat = y.toNat := ⟨congrArg _, UInt64.ext⟩
@[simp] theorem UInt64.val_val_eq_toNat (x : UInt64) : x.val.val = x.toNat := rfl
theorem UInt64.toNat_lt (x : UInt64) : x.toNat < 2 ^ 64 := x.val.isLt
@[simp] theorem UInt64.toUInt8_toNat (x : UInt64) : x.toUInt8.toNat = x.toNat % 2 ^ 8 := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt64.toUInt16_toNat (x : UInt64) : x.toUInt16.toNat = x.toNat % 2 ^ 16 := rfl
@[simp] theorem UInt64.toUInt32_toNat (x : UInt64) : x.toUInt32.toNat = x.toNat % 2 ^ 32 := rfl
theorem UInt64.le_antisymm_iff {x y : UInt64} : x = y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x :=
UInt64.ext_iff.trans Nat.le_antisymm_iff
theorem UInt64.le_antisymm {x y : UInt64} (h1 : x ≤ y) (h2 : y ≤ x) : x = y :=
UInt64.le_antisymm_iff.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩
instance : Batteries.LawfulOrd UInt64 := .compareOfLessAndEq
(fun _ => Nat.lt_irrefl _) Nat.lt_trans Nat.not_lt UInt64.le_antisymm
/-! ### USize -/
@[ext] theorem USize.ext : {x y : USize} → x.toNat = y.toNat → x = y
| ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_,_⟩⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem USize.ext_iff {x y : USize} : x = y ↔ x.toNat = y.toNat := ⟨congrArg _, USize.ext⟩
@[simp] theorem USize.val_val_eq_toNat (x : USize) : x.val.val = x.toNat := rfl
theorem USize.size_eq : USize.size = 2 ^ System.Platform.numBits := by
have : 1 ≤ 2 ^ System.Platform.numBits := Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
rw [USize.size, Nat.sub_add_cancel this]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/UInt.lean | 125 | 128 | theorem USize.le_size : 2 ^ 32 ≤ USize.size := by |
rw [size_eq]
apply Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by decide)
cases System.Platform.numBits_eq <;> simp_arith [*]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
/-! ### mem -/
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
/-! ### drop -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
/-! ### List subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 91 | 100 | theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by |
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableIntegral
#align_import probability.kernel.composition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3b92d54a05ee592aa2c6181a4e76b1bb7cc45d0b"
/-!
# Product and composition of kernels
We define
* the composition-product `κ ⊗ₖ η` of two s-finite kernels `κ : kernel α β` and
`η : kernel (α × β) γ`, a kernel from `α` to `β × γ`.
* the map and comap of a kernel along a measurable function.
* the composition `η ∘ₖ κ` of kernels `κ : kernel α β` and `η : kernel β γ`, kernel from `α` to
`γ`.
* the product `κ ×ₖ η` of s-finite kernels `κ : kernel α β` and `η : kernel α γ`,
a kernel from `α` to `β × γ`.
A note on names:
The composition-product `kernel α β → kernel (α × β) γ → kernel α (β × γ)` is named composition in
[kallenberg2021] and product on the wikipedia article on transition kernels.
Most papers studying categories of kernels call composition the map we call composition. We adopt
that convention because it fits better with the use of the name `comp` elsewhere in mathlib.
## Main definitions
Kernels built from other kernels:
* `compProd (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) : kernel α (β × γ)`: composition-product of 2
s-finite kernels. We define a notation `κ ⊗ₖ η = compProd κ η`.
`∫⁻ bc, f bc ∂((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) = ∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c, f (b, c) ∂(η (a, b)) ∂(κ a)`
* `map (κ : kernel α β) (f : β → γ) (hf : Measurable f) : kernel α γ`
`∫⁻ c, g c ∂(map κ f hf a) = ∫⁻ b, g (f b) ∂(κ a)`
* `comap (κ : kernel α β) (f : γ → α) (hf : Measurable f) : kernel γ β`
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(comap κ f hf c) = ∫⁻ b, g b ∂(κ (f c))`
* `comp (η : kernel β γ) (κ : kernel α β) : kernel α γ`: composition of 2 kernels.
We define a notation `η ∘ₖ κ = comp η κ`.
`∫⁻ c, g c ∂((η ∘ₖ κ) a) = ∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c, g c ∂(η b) ∂(κ a)`
* `prod (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel α γ) : kernel α (β × γ)`: product of 2 s-finite kernels.
`∫⁻ bc, f bc ∂((κ ×ₖ η) a) = ∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c, f (b, c) ∂(η a) ∂(κ a)`
## Main statements
* `lintegral_compProd`, `lintegral_map`, `lintegral_comap`, `lintegral_comp`, `lintegral_prod`:
Lebesgue integral of a function against a composition-product/map/comap/composition/product of
kernels.
* Instances of the form `<class>.<operation>` where class is one of `IsMarkovKernel`,
`IsFiniteKernel`, `IsSFiniteKernel` and operation is one of `compProd`, `map`, `comap`,
`comp`, `prod`. These instances state that the three classes are stable by the various operations.
## Notations
* `κ ⊗ₖ η = ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd κ η`
* `η ∘ₖ κ = ProbabilityTheory.kernel.comp η κ`
* `κ ×ₖ η = ProbabilityTheory.kernel.prod κ η`
-/
open MeasureTheory
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
namespace kernel
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
section CompositionProduct
/-!
### Composition-Product of kernels
We define a kernel composition-product
`compProd : kernel α β → kernel (α × β) γ → kernel α (β × γ)`.
-/
variable {γ : Type*} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {s : Set (β × γ)}
/-- Auxiliary function for the definition of the composition-product of two kernels.
For all `a : α`, `compProdFun κ η a` is a countably additive function with value zero on the empty
set, and the composition-product of kernels is defined in `kernel.compProd` through
`Measure.ofMeasurable`. -/
noncomputable def compProdFun (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) (a : α) (s : Set (β × γ)) :
ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun
theorem compProdFun_empty (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) (a : α) :
compProdFun κ η a ∅ = 0 := by
simp only [compProdFun, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, Set.setOf_false, measure_empty,
MeasureTheory.lintegral_const, zero_mul]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_empty ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_empty
theorem compProdFun_iUnion (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) [IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α)
(f : ℕ → Set (β × γ)) (hf_meas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
compProdFun κ η a (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, compProdFun κ η a (f i) := by
have h_Union :
(fun b => η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ ⋃ i, f i}) = fun b =>
η (a, b) (⋃ i, {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ f i}) := by
ext1 b
congr with c
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [compProdFun, h_Union]
have h_tsum :
(fun b => η (a, b) (⋃ i, {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ f i})) = fun b =>
∑' i, η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ f i} := by
ext1 b
rw [measure_iUnion]
· intro i j hij s hsi hsj c hcs
have hbci : {(b, c)} ⊆ f i := by rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff]; exact hsi hcs
have hbcj : {(b, c)} ⊆ f j := by rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff]; exact hsj hcs
simpa only [Set.bot_eq_empty, Set.le_eq_subset, Set.singleton_subset_iff,
Set.mem_empty_iff_false] using hf_disj hij hbci hbcj
· -- Porting note: behavior of `@` changed relative to lean 3, was
-- exact fun i => (@measurable_prod_mk_left β γ _ _ b) _ (hf_meas i)
exact fun i => (@measurable_prod_mk_left β γ _ _ b) (hf_meas i)
rw [h_tsum, lintegral_tsum]
· rfl
· intro i
have hm : MeasurableSet {p : (α × β) × γ | (p.1.2, p.2) ∈ f i} :=
measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd (hf_meas i)
exact ((measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left hm).comp measurable_prod_mk_left).aemeasurable
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_Union ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_iUnion
theorem compProdFun_tsum_right (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) [IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : compProdFun κ η a s = ∑' n, compProdFun κ (seq η n) a s := by
simp_rw [compProdFun, (measure_sum_seq η _).symm]
have :
∫⁻ b, Measure.sum (fun n => seq η n (a, b)) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a =
∫⁻ b, ∑' n, seq η n (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a := by
congr
ext1 b
rw [Measure.sum_apply]
exact measurable_prod_mk_left hs
rw [this, lintegral_tsum]
exact fun n => ((measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left (κ := (seq η n))
((measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd) hs)).comp measurable_prod_mk_left).aemeasurable
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_tsum_right ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_tsum_right
theorem compProdFun_tsum_left (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (a : α)
(s : Set (β × γ)) : compProdFun κ η a s = ∑' n, compProdFun (seq κ n) η a s := by
simp_rw [compProdFun, (measure_sum_seq κ _).symm, lintegral_sum_measure]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_tsum_left ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_tsum_left
theorem compProdFun_eq_tsum (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
compProdFun κ η a s = ∑' (n) (m), compProdFun (seq κ n) (seq η m) a s := by
simp_rw [compProdFun_tsum_left κ η a s, compProdFun_tsum_right _ η a hs]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_eq_tsum ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_eq_tsum
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `measurable_compProdFun`. -/
theorem measurable_compProdFun_of_finite (κ : kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsFiniteKernel η] (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun a => compProdFun κ η a s := by
simp only [compProdFun]
have h_meas : Measurable (Function.uncurry fun a b => η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s}) := by
have :
(Function.uncurry fun a b => η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s}) = fun p =>
η p {c : γ | (p.2, c) ∈ s} := by
ext1 p
rw [Function.uncurry_apply_pair]
rw [this]
exact measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left (measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd hs)
exact h_meas.lintegral_kernel_prod_right
#align probability_theory.kernel.measurable_comp_prod_fun_of_finite ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measurable_compProdFun_of_finite
theorem measurable_compProdFun (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun a => compProdFun κ η a s := by
simp_rw [compProdFun_tsum_right κ η _ hs]
refine Measurable.ennreal_tsum fun n => ?_
simp only [compProdFun]
have h_meas : Measurable (Function.uncurry fun a b => seq η n (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s}) := by
have :
(Function.uncurry fun a b => seq η n (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s}) = fun p =>
seq η n p {c : γ | (p.2, c) ∈ s} := by
ext1 p
rw [Function.uncurry_apply_pair]
rw [this]
exact measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left (measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd hs)
exact h_meas.lintegral_kernel_prod_right
#align probability_theory.kernel.measurable_comp_prod_fun ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measurable_compProdFun
open scoped Classical
/-- Composition-Product of kernels. For s-finite kernels, it satisfies
`∫⁻ bc, f bc ∂(compProd κ η a) = ∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c, f (b, c) ∂(η (a, b)) ∂(κ a)`
(see `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.lintegral_compProd`).
If either of the kernels is not s-finite, `compProd` is given the junk value 0. -/
noncomputable def compProd (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) : kernel α (β × γ) :=
if h : IsSFiniteKernel κ ∧ IsSFiniteKernel η then
{ val := fun a ↦
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => compProdFun κ η a s) (compProdFun_empty κ η a)
(@compProdFun_iUnion _ _ _ _ _ _ κ η h.2 a)
property := by
have : IsSFiniteKernel κ := h.1
have : IsSFiniteKernel η := h.2
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
have :
(fun a =>
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => compProdFun κ η a s) (compProdFun_empty κ η a)
(compProdFun_iUnion κ η a) s) =
fun a => compProdFun κ η a s := by
ext1 a; rwa [Measure.ofMeasurable_apply]
rw [this]
exact measurable_compProdFun κ η hs }
else 0
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd
scoped[ProbabilityTheory] infixl:100 " ⊗ₖ " => ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd
theorem compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(κ ⊗ₖ η) a s = compProdFun κ η a s := by
rw [compProd, dif_pos]
swap
· constructor <;> infer_instance
change
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => compProdFun κ η a s) (compProdFun_empty κ η a)
(compProdFun_iUnion κ η a) s =
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a
rw [Measure.ofMeasurable_apply _ hs]
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_apply_eq_comp_prod_fun ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun
theorem compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_left (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
(h : ¬ IsSFiniteKernel κ) :
κ ⊗ₖ η = 0 := by
rw [compProd, dif_neg]
simp [h]
theorem compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_right (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
(h : ¬ IsSFiniteKernel η) :
κ ⊗ₖ η = 0 := by
rw [compProd, dif_neg]
simp [h]
theorem compProd_apply (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(κ ⊗ₖ η) a s = ∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a :=
compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun κ η a hs
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_apply
theorem le_compProd_apply (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (s : Set (β × γ)) :
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a ≤ (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s :=
calc
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a ≤
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ toMeasurable ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) s} ∂κ a :=
lintegral_mono fun _ => measure_mono fun _ h_mem => subset_toMeasurable _ _ h_mem
_ = (κ ⊗ₖ η) a (toMeasurable ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) s) :=
(kernel.compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun κ η a (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)).symm
_ = (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s := measure_toMeasurable s
#align probability_theory.kernel.le_comp_prod_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.le_compProd_apply
@[simp]
lemma compProd_zero_left (κ : kernel (α × β) γ) :
(0 : kernel α β) ⊗ₖ κ = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsSFiniteKernel κ
· ext a s hs
rw [kernel.compProd_apply _ _ _ hs]
simp
· rw [kernel.compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_right _ _ h]
@[simp]
lemma compProd_zero_right (κ : kernel α β) (γ : Type*) [MeasurableSpace γ] :
κ ⊗ₖ (0 : kernel (α × β) γ) = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsSFiniteKernel κ
· ext a s hs
rw [kernel.compProd_apply _ _ _ hs]
simp
· rw [kernel.compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_left _ _ h]
section Ae
/-! ### `ae` filter of the composition-product -/
variable {κ : kernel α β} [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {η : kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η] {a : α}
theorem ae_kernel_lt_top (a : α) (h2s : (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ b ∂κ a, η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
let t := toMeasurable ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) s
have : ∀ b : β, η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s) ≤ η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' t) := fun b =>
measure_mono (Set.preimage_mono (subset_toMeasurable _ _))
have ht : MeasurableSet t := measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
have h2t : (κ ⊗ₖ η) a t ≠ ∞ := by rwa [measure_toMeasurable]
have ht_lt_top : ∀ᵐ b ∂κ a, η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' t) < ∞ := by
rw [kernel.compProd_apply _ _ _ ht] at h2t
exact ae_lt_top (kernel.measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left' ht a) h2t
filter_upwards [ht_lt_top] with b hb
exact (this b).trans_lt hb
#align probability_theory.kernel.ae_kernel_lt_top ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ae_kernel_lt_top
theorem compProd_null (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(κ ⊗ₖ η) a s = 0 ↔ (fun b => η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)) =ᵐ[κ a] 0 := by
rw [kernel.compProd_apply _ _ _ hs, lintegral_eq_zero_iff]
· rfl
· exact kernel.measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left' hs a
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_null ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_null
theorem ae_null_of_compProd_null (h : (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s = 0) :
(fun b => η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)) =ᵐ[κ a] 0 := by
obtain ⟨t, hst, mt, ht⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null h
simp_rw [compProd_null a mt] at ht
rw [Filter.eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff]
exact
⟨Filter.EventuallyLE.trans_eq
(Filter.eventually_of_forall fun x => (measure_mono (Set.preimage_mono hst) : _)) ht,
Filter.eventually_of_forall fun x => zero_le _⟩
#align probability_theory.kernel.ae_null_of_comp_prod_null ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ae_null_of_compProd_null
theorem ae_ae_of_ae_compProd {p : β × γ → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ bc ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a, p bc) :
∀ᵐ b ∂κ a, ∀ᵐ c ∂η (a, b), p (b, c) :=
ae_null_of_compProd_null h
#align probability_theory.kernel.ae_ae_of_ae_comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ae_ae_of_ae_compProd
lemma ae_compProd_of_ae_ae {p : β × γ → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet {x | p x})
(h : ∀ᵐ b ∂κ a, ∀ᵐ c ∂η (a, b), p (b, c)) :
∀ᵐ bc ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a, p bc := by
simp_rw [ae_iff] at h ⊢
rw [compProd_null]
· exact h
· exact hp.compl
lemma ae_compProd_iff {p : β × γ → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet {x | p x}) :
(∀ᵐ bc ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a, p bc) ↔ ∀ᵐ b ∂κ a, ∀ᵐ c ∂η (a, b), p (b, c) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ae_ae_of_ae_compProd h, fun h ↦ ae_compProd_of_ae_ae hp h⟩
end Ae
section Restrict
variable {κ : kernel α β} [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {η : kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η] {a : α}
theorem compProd_restrict {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
kernel.restrict κ hs ⊗ₖ kernel.restrict η ht = kernel.restrict (κ ⊗ₖ η) (hs.prod ht) := by
ext a u hu
rw [compProd_apply _ _ _ hu, restrict_apply' _ _ _ hu,
compProd_apply _ _ _ (hu.inter (hs.prod ht))]
simp only [kernel.restrict_apply, Measure.restrict_apply' ht, Set.mem_inter_iff,
Set.prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq]
have :
∀ b,
η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ u ∧ b ∈ s ∧ c ∈ t} =
s.indicator (fun b => η (a, b) ({c : γ | (b, c) ∈ u} ∩ t)) b := by
intro b
classical
rw [Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_and_iff]
rfl
· simp only [h, false_and_iff, and_false_iff, Set.setOf_false, measure_empty]
simp_rw [this]
rw [lintegral_indicator _ hs]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_restrict ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_restrict
theorem compProd_restrict_left {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
kernel.restrict κ hs ⊗ₖ η = kernel.restrict (κ ⊗ₖ η) (hs.prod MeasurableSet.univ) := by
rw [← compProd_restrict]
· congr; exact kernel.restrict_univ.symm
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_restrict_left ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_restrict_left
theorem compProd_restrict_right {t : Set γ} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
κ ⊗ₖ kernel.restrict η ht = kernel.restrict (κ ⊗ₖ η) (MeasurableSet.univ.prod ht) := by
rw [← compProd_restrict]
· congr; exact kernel.restrict_univ.symm
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_restrict_right ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_restrict_right
end Restrict
section Lintegral
/-! ### Lebesgue integral -/
/-- Lebesgue integral against the composition-product of two kernels. -/
theorem lintegral_compProd' (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) {f : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) :
∫⁻ bc, f bc.1 bc.2 ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c, f b c ∂η (a, b) ∂κ a := by
let F : ℕ → SimpleFunc (β × γ) ℝ≥0∞ := SimpleFunc.eapprox (Function.uncurry f)
have h : ∀ a, ⨆ n, F n a = Function.uncurry f a :=
SimpleFunc.iSup_eapprox_apply (Function.uncurry f) hf
simp only [Prod.forall, Function.uncurry_apply_pair] at h
simp_rw [← h]
have h_mono : Monotone F := fun i j hij b =>
SimpleFunc.monotone_eapprox (Function.uncurry f) hij _
rw [lintegral_iSup (fun n => (F n).measurable) h_mono]
have : ∀ b, ∫⁻ c, ⨆ n, F n (b, c) ∂η (a, b) = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ c, F n (b, c) ∂η (a, b) := by
intro a
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· exact fun n => (F n).measurable.comp measurable_prod_mk_left
· exact fun i j hij b => h_mono hij _
simp_rw [this]
have h_some_meas_integral :
∀ f' : SimpleFunc (β × γ) ℝ≥0∞, Measurable fun b => ∫⁻ c, f' (b, c) ∂η (a, b) := by
intro f'
have :
(fun b => ∫⁻ c, f' (b, c) ∂η (a, b)) =
(fun ab => ∫⁻ c, f' (ab.2, c) ∂η ab) ∘ fun b => (a, b) := by
ext1 ab; rfl
rw [this]
apply Measurable.comp _ (measurable_prod_mk_left (m := mα))
exact Measurable.lintegral_kernel_prod_right
((SimpleFunc.measurable _).comp (measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd))
rw [lintegral_iSup]
rotate_left
· exact fun n => h_some_meas_integral (F n)
· exact fun i j hij b => lintegral_mono fun c => h_mono hij _
congr
ext1 n
-- Porting note: Added `(P := _)`
refine SimpleFunc.induction (P := fun f => (∫⁻ (a : β × γ), f a ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a =
∫⁻ (a_1 : β), ∫⁻ (c : γ), f (a_1, c) ∂η (a, a_1) ∂κ a)) ?_ ?_ (F n)
· intro c s hs
classical -- Porting note: Added `classical` for `Set.piecewise_eq_indicator`
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [SimpleFunc.const_zero,
SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, SimpleFunc.coe_const, SimpleFunc.coe_zero,
Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, Function.const, lintegral_indicator_const hs]
rw [compProd_apply κ η _ hs, ← lintegral_const_mul c _]
swap
· exact (measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left ((measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd) hs)).comp
measurable_prod_mk_left
congr
ext1 b
rw [lintegral_indicator_const_comp measurable_prod_mk_left hs]
rfl
· intro f f' _ hf_eq hf'_eq
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
change
∫⁻ x, (f : β × γ → ℝ≥0∞) x + f' x ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a =
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c : γ, f (b, c) + f' (b, c) ∂η (a, b) ∂κ a
rw [lintegral_add_left (SimpleFunc.measurable _), hf_eq, hf'_eq, ← lintegral_add_left]
swap
· exact h_some_meas_integral f
congr with b
rw [lintegral_add_left]
exact (SimpleFunc.measurable _).comp measurable_prod_mk_left
#align probability_theory.kernel.lintegral_comp_prod' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.lintegral_compProd'
/-- Lebesgue integral against the composition-product of two kernels. -/
theorem lintegral_compProd (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) {f : β × γ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ bc, f bc ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c, f (b, c) ∂η (a, b) ∂κ a := by
let g := Function.curry f
change ∫⁻ bc, f bc ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c, g b c ∂η (a, b) ∂κ a
rw [← lintegral_compProd']
· simp_rw [g, Function.curry_apply]
· simp_rw [g, Function.uncurry_curry]; exact hf
#align probability_theory.kernel.lintegral_comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.kernel.lintegral_compProd
/-- Lebesgue integral against the composition-product of two kernels. -/
theorem lintegral_compProd₀ (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) {f : β × γ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫⁻ z, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
have A : ∫⁻ z, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫⁻ z, hf.mk f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, hf.mk f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd hf.ae_eq_mk] with _ ha using lintegral_congr_ae ha
rw [A, B, lintegral_compProd]
exact hf.measurable_mk
#align probability_theory.kernel.lintegral_comp_prod₀ ProbabilityTheory.kernel.lintegral_compProd₀
theorem set_lintegral_compProd (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) {f : β × γ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} {t : Set γ}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ z in s ×ˢ t, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫⁻ x in s, ∫⁻ y in t, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
simp_rw [← kernel.restrict_apply (κ ⊗ₖ η) (hs.prod ht), ← compProd_restrict hs ht,
lintegral_compProd _ _ _ hf, kernel.restrict_apply]
#align probability_theory.kernel.set_lintegral_comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.kernel.set_lintegral_compProd
theorem set_lintegral_compProd_univ_right (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(η : kernel (α × β) γ) [IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) {f : β × γ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ z in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫⁻ x in s, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
simp_rw [set_lintegral_compProd κ η a hf hs MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_univ]
#align probability_theory.kernel.set_lintegral_comp_prod_univ_right ProbabilityTheory.kernel.set_lintegral_compProd_univ_right
theorem set_lintegral_compProd_univ_left (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) {f : β × γ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {t : Set γ}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ z in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y in t, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
simp_rw [set_lintegral_compProd κ η a hf MeasurableSet.univ ht, Measure.restrict_univ]
#align probability_theory.kernel.set_lintegral_comp_prod_univ_left ProbabilityTheory.kernel.set_lintegral_compProd_univ_left
end Lintegral
theorem compProd_eq_tsum_compProd (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(κ ⊗ₖ η) a s = ∑' (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), (seq κ n ⊗ₖ seq η m) a s := by
simp_rw [compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun _ _ _ hs]; exact compProdFun_eq_tsum κ η a hs
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_eq_tsum_comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_eq_tsum_compProd
theorem compProd_eq_sum_compProd (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] : κ ⊗ₖ η = kernel.sum fun n => kernel.sum fun m => seq κ n ⊗ₖ seq η m := by
ext a s hs; simp_rw [kernel.sum_apply' _ a hs]; rw [compProd_eq_tsum_compProd κ η a hs]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_eq_sum_comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_eq_sum_compProd
theorem compProd_eq_sum_compProd_left (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ) :
κ ⊗ₖ η = kernel.sum fun n => seq κ n ⊗ₖ η := by
by_cases h : IsSFiniteKernel η
swap
· simp_rw [compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_right _ _ h]
simp
rw [compProd_eq_sum_compProd]
congr with n a s hs
simp_rw [kernel.sum_apply' _ _ hs, compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun _ _ _ hs,
compProdFun_tsum_right _ η a hs]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_eq_sum_comp_prod_left ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_eq_sum_compProd_left
theorem compProd_eq_sum_compProd_right (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] : κ ⊗ₖ η = kernel.sum fun n => κ ⊗ₖ seq η n := by
by_cases hκ : IsSFiniteKernel κ
swap
· simp_rw [compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_left _ _ hκ]
simp
rw [compProd_eq_sum_compProd]
simp_rw [compProd_eq_sum_compProd_left κ _]
rw [kernel.sum_comm]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_eq_sum_comp_prod_right ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_eq_sum_compProd_right
instance IsMarkovKernel.compProd (κ : kernel α β) [IsMarkovKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsMarkovKernel η] : IsMarkovKernel (κ ⊗ₖ η) :=
⟨fun a =>
⟨by
rw [compProd_apply κ η a MeasurableSet.univ]
simp only [Set.mem_univ, Set.setOf_true, measure_univ, lintegral_one]⟩⟩
#align probability_theory.kernel.is_markov_kernel.comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IsMarkovKernel.compProd
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Composition.lean | 534 | 547 | theorem compProd_apply_univ_le (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) [IsFiniteKernel η] (a : α) :
(κ ⊗ₖ η) a Set.univ ≤ κ a Set.univ * IsFiniteKernel.bound η := by |
by_cases hκ : IsSFiniteKernel κ
swap
· rw [compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_left _ _ hκ]
simp
rw [compProd_apply κ η a MeasurableSet.univ]
simp only [Set.mem_univ, Set.setOf_true]
let Cη := IsFiniteKernel.bound η
calc
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) Set.univ ∂κ a ≤ ∫⁻ _, Cη ∂κ a :=
lintegral_mono fun b => measure_le_bound η (a, b) Set.univ
_ = Cη * κ a Set.univ := MeasureTheory.lintegral_const Cη
_ = κ a Set.univ * Cη := mul_comm _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
* `enumOrd`: enumerates an unbounded set of ordinals by the ordinals themselves.
* `sup`, `lsub`: the supremum / least strict upper bound of an indexed family of ordinals in
`Type u`, as an ordinal in `Type u`.
* `bsup`, `blsub`: the supremum / least strict upper bound of a set of ordinals indexed by ordinals
less than a given ordinal `o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 145 | 146 | theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by |
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.inverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open Set Filter
open Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
#align real.arcsin Real.arcsin
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arcsin_mem_Icc Real.arcsin_mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
#align real.range_arcsin Real.range_arcsin
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
#align real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
#align real.arcsin_proj_Icc Real.arcsin_projIcc
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
#align real.sin_arcsin' Real.sin_arcsin'
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.sin_arcsin Real.sin_arcsin
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
#align real.arcsin_sin' Real.arcsin_sin'
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.arcsin_sin Real.arcsin_sin
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
#align real.strict_mono_on_arcsin Real.strictMonoOn_arcsin
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
#align real.monotone_arcsin Real.monotone_arcsin
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
#align real.inj_on_arcsin Real.injOn_arcsin
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
#align real.arcsin_inj Real.arcsin_inj
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
#align real.continuous_arcsin Real.continuous_arcsin
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
#align real.continuous_at_arcsin Real.continuousAt_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
#align real.arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq Real.arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
#align real.arcsin_zero Real.arcsin_zero
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
#align real.arcsin_one Real.arcsin_one
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
#align real.arcsin_of_one_le Real.arcsin_of_one_le
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
#align real.arcsin_neg_one Real.arcsin_neg_one
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
#align real.arcsin_of_le_neg_one Real.arcsin_of_le_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
#align real.arcsin_neg Real.arcsin_neg
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
#align real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin Real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
cases' lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
#align real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' Real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin'
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
#align real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le Real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
#align real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' Real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le'
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
#align real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin Real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
#align real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' Real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin'
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
#align real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt Real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
#align real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' Real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt'
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
#align real.arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin Real.arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
#align real.arcsin_nonneg Real.arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
#align real.arcsin_nonpos Real.arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
#align real.arcsin_eq_zero_iff Real.arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
#align real.zero_eq_arcsin_iff Real.zero_eq_arcsin_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
#align real.arcsin_pos Real.arcsin_pos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
#align real.arcsin_lt_zero Real.arcsin_lt_zero
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
#align real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
#align real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
#align real.pi_div_two_eq_arcsin Real.pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
#align real.pi_div_two_le_arcsin Real.pi_div_two_le_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
#align real.arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
#align real.arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
#align real.pi_div_four_le_arcsin Real.pi_div_four_le_arcsin
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
#align real.maps_to_sin_Ioo Real.mapsTo_sin_Ioo
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
#align real.sin_local_homeomorph Real.sinPartialHomeomorph
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
#align real.cos_arcsin_nonneg Real.cos_arcsin_nonneg
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
#align real.cos_arcsin Real.cos_arcsin
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arcsin (x : ℝ) : tan (arcsin x) = x / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_arcsin]
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
rw [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
#align real.tan_arcsin Real.tan_arcsin
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
It defaults to `π` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `0` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
#align real.arccos Real.arccos
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x :=
rfl
#align real.arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin Real.arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos Real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos
theorem arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π := by
unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
#align real.arccos_le_pi Real.arccos_le_pi
theorem arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x := by
unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
#align real.arccos_nonneg Real.arccos_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arccos_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arccos x ↔ x < 1 := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arccos_pos Real.arccos_pos
theorem cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
#align real.cos_arccos Real.cos_arccos
theorem arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin] <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg] <;> linarith
#align real.arccos_cos Real.arccos_cos
lemma arccos_eq_of_eq_cos (hy₀ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₁ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x = cos y) : arccos x = y := by
rw [hxy, arccos_cos hy₀ hy₁]
theorem strictAntiOn_arccos : StrictAntiOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
sub_lt_sub_left (strictMonoOn_arcsin hx hy h) _
#align real.strict_anti_on_arccos Real.strictAntiOn_arccos
theorem arccos_injOn : InjOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictAntiOn_arccos.injOn
#align real.arccos_inj_on Real.arccos_injOn
theorem arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arccos x = arccos y ↔ x = y :=
arccos_injOn.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
#align real.arccos_inj Real.arccos_inj
@[simp]
theorem arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arccos_zero Real.arccos_zero
@[simp]
theorem arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arccos_one Real.arccos_one
@[simp]
theorem arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
#align real.arccos_neg_one Real.arccos_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_zero {x} : arccos x = 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by simp [arccos, sub_eq_zero]
#align real.arccos_eq_zero Real.arccos_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x = π / 2 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arccos_eq_pi_div_two Real.arccos_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi {x} : arccos x = π ↔ x ≤ -1 := by
rw [arccos, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add', div_two_sub_self, neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin]
#align real.arccos_eq_pi Real.arccos_eq_pi
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 410 | 411 | theorem arccos_neg (x : ℝ) : arccos (-x) = π - arccos x := by |
rw [← add_halves π, arccos, arcsin_neg, arccos, add_sub_assoc, sub_sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.