Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid.VertexGroup
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import category_theory.groupoid.subgroupoid from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Subgroupoid
This file defines subgroupoids as `structure`s containing the subsets of arrows and their
stability under composition and inversion.
Also defined are:
* containment of subgroupoids is a complete lattice;
* images and preimages of subgroupoids under a functor;
* the notion of normality of subgroupoids and its stability under intersection and preimage;
* compatibility of the above with `CategoryTheory.Groupoid.vertexGroup`.
## Main definitions
Given a type `C` with associated `groupoid C` instance.
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid C` is the type of subgroupoids of `C`
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsNormal` is the property that the subgroupoid is stable under
conjugation by arbitrary arrows, _and_ that all identity arrows are contained in the subgroupoid.
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.comap` is the "preimage" map of subgroupoids along a functor.
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.map` is the "image" map of subgroupoids along a functor _injective on
objects_.
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.vertexSubgroup` is the subgroup of the `vertex group` at a given
vertex `v`, assuming `v` is contained in the `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid` (meaning, by definition,
that the arrow `𝟙 v` is contained in the subgroupoid).
## Implementation details
The structure of this file is copied from/inspired by `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean`
and `Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Subgraph.lean`.
## TODO
* Equivalent inductive characterization of generated (normal) subgroupoids.
* Characterization of normal subgroupoids as kernels.
* Prove that `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.full` and `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.disconnect` preserve
intersections (and `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.disconnect` also unions)
## Tags
category theory, groupoid, subgroupoid
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Set Groupoid
universe u v
variable {C : Type u} [Groupoid C]
/-- A sugroupoid of `C` consists of a choice of arrows for each pair of vertices, closed
under composition and inverses.
-/
@[ext]
structure Subgroupoid (C : Type u) [Groupoid C] where
arrows : ∀ c d : C, Set (c ⟶ d)
protected inv : ∀ {c d} {p : c ⟶ d}, p ∈ arrows c d → Groupoid.inv p ∈ arrows d c
protected mul : ∀ {c d e} {p}, p ∈ arrows c d → ∀ {q}, q ∈ arrows d e → p ≫ q ∈ arrows c e
#align category_theory.subgroupoid CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid
namespace Subgroupoid
variable (S : Subgroupoid C)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Groupoid/Subgroupoid.lean | 82 | 87 | theorem inv_mem_iff {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d) :
Groupoid.inv f ∈ S.arrows d c ↔ f ∈ S.arrows c d := by |
constructor
· intro h
simpa only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.inv_inv] using S.inv h
· apply S.inv
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.natural_ops from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
/-!
# Natural operations on ordinals
The goal of this file is to define natural addition and multiplication on ordinals, also known as
the Hessenberg sum and product, and provide a basic API. The natural addition of two ordinals
`a ♯ b` is recursively defined as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for `a' < a`
and `b' < b`. The natural multiplication `a ⨳ b` is likewise recursively defined as the least
ordinal such that `a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b'` for any `a' < a` and
`b' < b`.
These operations form a rich algebraic structure: they're commutative, associative, preserve order,
have the usual `0` and `1` from ordinals, and distribute over one another.
Moreover, these operations are the addition and multiplication of ordinals when viewed as
combinatorial `Game`s. This makes them particularly useful for game theory.
Finally, both operations admit simple, intuitive descriptions in terms of the Cantor normal form.
The natural addition of two ordinals corresponds to adding their Cantor normal forms as if they were
polynomials in `ω`. Likewise, their natural multiplication corresponds to multiplying the Cantor
normal forms as polynomials.
# Implementation notes
Given the rich algebraic structure of these two operations, we choose to create a type synonym
`NatOrdinal`, where we provide the appropriate instances. However, to avoid casting back and forth
between both types, we attempt to prove and state most results on `Ordinal`.
# Todo
- Prove the characterizations of natural addition and multiplication in terms of the Cantor normal
form.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u v
open Function Order
noncomputable section
/-! ### Basic casts between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal` -/
/-- A type synonym for ordinals with natural addition and multiplication. -/
def NatOrdinal : Type _ :=
-- Porting note: used to derive LinearOrder & SuccOrder but need to manually define
Ordinal deriving Zero, Inhabited, One, WellFoundedRelation
#align nat_ordinal NatOrdinal
instance NatOrdinal.linearOrder : LinearOrder NatOrdinal := {Ordinal.linearOrder with}
instance NatOrdinal.succOrder : SuccOrder NatOrdinal := {Ordinal.succOrder with}
/-- The identity function between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def Ordinal.toNatOrdinal : Ordinal ≃o NatOrdinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal Ordinal.toNatOrdinal
/-- The identity function between `NatOrdinal` and `Ordinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def NatOrdinal.toOrdinal : NatOrdinal ≃o Ordinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal NatOrdinal.toOrdinal
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_symm_eq : NatOrdinal.toOrdinal.symm = Ordinal.toNatOrdinal :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_symm_eq NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_symm_eq
-- Porting note: used to use dot notation, but doesn't work in Lean 4 with `OrderIso`
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_toNatOrdinal (a : NatOrdinal) :
Ordinal.toNatOrdinal (NatOrdinal.toOrdinal a) = a := rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_to_nat_ordinal NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_toNatOrdinal
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded NatOrdinal (· < ·) :=
Ordinal.lt_wf
#align nat_ordinal.lt_wf NatOrdinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedLT NatOrdinal :=
Ordinal.wellFoundedLT
instance : IsWellOrder NatOrdinal (· < ·) :=
Ordinal.isWellOrder
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_zero : toOrdinal 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_zero NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_one : toOrdinal 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_one NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_one
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_eq_zero (a) : toOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_eq_zero NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_eq_one (a) : toOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_eq_one NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_max : toOrdinal (max a b) = max (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_max NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_max
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_min : toOrdinal (min a b)= min (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_min NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_min
theorem succ_def (a : NatOrdinal) : succ a = toNatOrdinal (toOrdinal a + 1) :=
rfl
#align nat_ordinal.succ_def NatOrdinal.succ_def
/-- A recursor for `NatOrdinal`. Use as `induction x using NatOrdinal.rec`. -/
protected def rec {β : NatOrdinal → Sort*} (h : ∀ a, β (toNatOrdinal a)) : ∀ a, β a := fun a =>
h (toOrdinal a)
#align nat_ordinal.rec NatOrdinal.rec
/-- `Ordinal.induction` but for `NatOrdinal`. -/
theorem induction {p : NatOrdinal → Prop} : ∀ (i) (_ : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j), p i :=
Ordinal.induction
#align nat_ordinal.induction NatOrdinal.induction
end NatOrdinal
namespace Ordinal
variable {a b c : Ordinal.{u}}
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_symm_eq : toNatOrdinal.symm = NatOrdinal.toOrdinal :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_symm_eq Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_symm_eq
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_toOrdinal (a : Ordinal) : NatOrdinal.toOrdinal (toNatOrdinal a) = a :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_to_ordinal Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_toOrdinal
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_zero : toNatOrdinal 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_zero Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_one : toNatOrdinal 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_one Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_one
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_zero (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_eq_zero Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_one (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_eq_one Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_max (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (max a b) = max (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_max Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_max
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_min (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (linearOrder.min a b) = linearOrder.min (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_min Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_min
/-! We place the definitions of `nadd` and `nmul` before actually developing their API, as this
guarantees we only need to open the `NaturalOps` locale once. -/
/-- Natural addition on ordinals `a ♯ b`, also known as the Hessenberg sum, is recursively defined
as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for all `a' < a` and `b' < b`. In contrast
to normal ordinal addition, it is commutative.
Natural addition can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from adding up
corresponding coefficients in the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b`. -/
noncomputable def nadd : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal
| a, b =>
max (blsub.{u, u} a fun a' _ => nadd a' b) (blsub.{u, u} b fun b' _ => nadd a b')
termination_by o₁ o₂ => (o₁, o₂)
#align ordinal.nadd Ordinal.nadd
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:65 " ♯ " => Ordinal.nadd
open NaturalOps
/-- Natural multiplication on ordinals `a ⨳ b`, also known as the Hessenberg product, is recursively
defined as the least ordinal such that `a ⨳ b + a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b + a ⨳ b'` for all
`a' < a` and `b < b'`. In contrast to normal ordinal multiplication, it is commutative and
distributive (over natural addition).
Natural multiplication can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from multiplying
the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b` as if they were polynomials in `ω`. Addition of exponents is
done via natural addition. -/
noncomputable def nmul : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}
| a, b => sInf {c | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, nmul a' b ♯ nmul a b' < c ♯ nmul a' b'}
termination_by a b => (a, b)
#align ordinal.nmul Ordinal.nmul
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:70 " ⨳ " => Ordinal.nmul
/-! ### Natural addition -/
theorem nadd_def (a b : Ordinal) :
a ♯ b = max (blsub.{u, u} a fun a' _ => a' ♯ b) (blsub.{u, u} b fun b' _ => a ♯ b') := by
rw [nadd]
#align ordinal.nadd_def Ordinal.nadd_def
theorem lt_nadd_iff : a < b ♯ c ↔ (∃ b' < b, a ≤ b' ♯ c) ∨ ∃ c' < c, a ≤ b ♯ c' := by
rw [nadd_def]
simp [lt_blsub_iff]
#align ordinal.lt_nadd_iff Ordinal.lt_nadd_iff
theorem nadd_le_iff : b ♯ c ≤ a ↔ (∀ b' < b, b' ♯ c < a) ∧ ∀ c' < c, b ♯ c' < a := by
rw [nadd_def]
simp [blsub_le_iff]
#align ordinal.nadd_le_iff Ordinal.nadd_le_iff
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_left (h : b < c) (a) : a ♯ b < a ♯ c :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_left Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_left
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_right (h : b < c) (a) : b ♯ a < c ♯ a :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_right Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_right
theorem nadd_le_nadd_left (h : b ≤ c) (a) : a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_left h a).le
· exact le_rfl
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_left Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_left
theorem nadd_le_nadd_right (h : b ≤ c) (a) : b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_right h a).le
· exact le_rfl
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_right Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_right
variable (a b)
theorem nadd_comm : ∀ a b, a ♯ b = b ♯ a
| a, b => by
rw [nadd_def, nadd_def, max_comm]
congr <;> ext <;> apply nadd_comm
termination_by a b => (a,b)
#align ordinal.nadd_comm Ordinal.nadd_comm
theorem blsub_nadd_of_mono {f : ∀ c < a ♯ b, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) :
-- Porting note: needed to add universe hint blsub.{u,v} in the line below
blsub.{u,v} _ f =
max (blsub.{u, v} a fun a' ha' => f (a' ♯ b) <| nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b)
(blsub.{u, v} b fun b' hb' => f (a ♯ b') <| nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) := by
apply (blsub_le_iff.2 fun i h => _).antisymm (max_le _ _)
· intro i h
rcases lt_nadd_iff.1 h with (⟨a', ha', hi⟩ | ⟨b', hb', hi⟩)
· exact lt_max_of_lt_left ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ ha'))
· exact lt_max_of_lt_right ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ hb'))
all_goals
apply blsub_le_of_brange_subset.{u, u, v}
rintro c ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩
apply mem_brange_self
#align ordinal.blsub_nadd_of_mono Ordinal.blsub_nadd_of_mono
theorem nadd_assoc (a b c) : a ♯ b ♯ c = a ♯ (b ♯ c) := by
rw [nadd_def a (b ♯ c), nadd_def, blsub_nadd_of_mono, blsub_nadd_of_mono, max_assoc]
· congr <;> ext <;> apply nadd_assoc
· exact fun _ _ h => nadd_le_nadd_left h a
· exact fun _ _ h => nadd_le_nadd_right h c
termination_by (a, b, c)
#align ordinal.nadd_assoc Ordinal.nadd_assoc
@[simp]
theorem nadd_zero : a ♯ 0 = a := by
induction' a using Ordinal.induction with a IH
rw [nadd_def, blsub_zero, max_zero_right]
convert blsub_id a
rename_i hb
exact IH _ hb
#align ordinal.nadd_zero Ordinal.nadd_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_nadd : 0 ♯ a = a := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_zero]
#align ordinal.zero_nadd Ordinal.zero_nadd
@[simp]
theorem nadd_one : a ♯ 1 = succ a := by
induction' a using Ordinal.induction with a IH
rw [nadd_def, blsub_one, nadd_zero, max_eq_right_iff, blsub_le_iff]
intro i hi
rwa [IH i hi, succ_lt_succ_iff]
#align ordinal.nadd_one Ordinal.nadd_one
@[simp]
theorem one_nadd : 1 ♯ a = succ a := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_one]
#align ordinal.one_nadd Ordinal.one_nadd
theorem nadd_succ : a ♯ succ b = succ (a ♯ b) := by rw [← nadd_one (a ♯ b), nadd_assoc, nadd_one]
#align ordinal.nadd_succ Ordinal.nadd_succ
theorem succ_nadd : succ a ♯ b = succ (a ♯ b) := by rw [← one_nadd (a ♯ b), ← nadd_assoc, one_nadd]
#align ordinal.succ_nadd Ordinal.succ_nadd
@[simp]
theorem nadd_nat (n : ℕ) : a ♯ n = a + n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, nadd_succ, add_succ, hn]
#align ordinal.nadd_nat Ordinal.nadd_nat
@[simp]
theorem nat_nadd (n : ℕ) : ↑n ♯ a = a + n := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_nat]
#align ordinal.nat_nadd Ordinal.nat_nadd
theorem add_le_nadd : a + b ≤ a ♯ b := by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp
| H₂ c h =>
rwa [add_succ, nadd_succ, succ_le_succ_iff]
| H₃ c hc H =>
simp_rw [← IsNormal.blsub_eq.{u, u} (add_isNormal a) hc, blsub_le_iff]
exact fun i hi => (H i hi).trans_lt (nadd_lt_nadd_left hi a)
#align ordinal.add_le_nadd Ordinal.add_le_nadd
end Ordinal
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal NaturalOps
instance : Add NatOrdinal :=
⟨nadd⟩
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass NatOrdinal.{u} NatOrdinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _ _ h => nadd_lt_nadd_left h a⟩
#align nat_ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt NatOrdinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass NatOrdinal.{u} NatOrdinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a _ _ h => nadd_le_nadd_left h a⟩
#align nat_ordinal.add_covariant_class_le NatOrdinal.add_covariantClass_le
instance add_contravariantClass_le :
ContravariantClass NatOrdinal.{u} NatOrdinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c h => by
by_contra! h'
exact h.not_lt (add_lt_add_left h' a)⟩
#align nat_ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le NatOrdinal.add_contravariantClass_le
instance orderedCancelAddCommMonoid : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid NatOrdinal :=
{ NatOrdinal.linearOrder with
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := nadd_assoc
add_le_add_left := fun a b => add_le_add_left
le_of_add_le_add_left := fun a b c => le_of_add_le_add_left
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_nadd
add_zero := nadd_zero
add_comm := nadd_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec }
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne NatOrdinal :=
AddMonoidWithOne.unary
@[simp]
theorem add_one_eq_succ : ∀ a : NatOrdinal, a + 1 = succ a :=
nadd_one
#align nat_ordinal.add_one_eq_succ NatOrdinal.add_one_eq_succ
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_cast_nat (n : ℕ) : toOrdinal n = n := by
induction' n with n hn
· rfl
· change (toOrdinal n) ♯ 1 = n + 1
rw [hn]; exact nadd_one n
#align nat_ordinal.to_ordinal_cast_nat NatOrdinal.toOrdinal_cast_nat
end NatOrdinal
open NatOrdinal
open NaturalOps
namespace Ordinal
theorem nadd_eq_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ♯ b = toOrdinal (toNatOrdinal a + toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nadd_eq_add Ordinal.nadd_eq_add
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_cast_nat (n : ℕ) : toNatOrdinal n = n := by
rw [← toOrdinal_cast_nat n]
rfl
#align ordinal.to_nat_ordinal_cast_nat Ordinal.toNatOrdinal_cast_nat
theorem lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_left : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b < a ♯ c → b < c :=
@lt_of_add_lt_add_left NatOrdinal _ _ _
#align ordinal.lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_left Ordinal.lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_left
theorem lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_right : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a < c ♯ a → b < c :=
@lt_of_add_lt_add_right NatOrdinal _ _ _
#align ordinal.lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_right Ordinal.lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_right
theorem le_of_nadd_le_nadd_left : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c → b ≤ c :=
@le_of_add_le_add_left NatOrdinal _ _ _
#align ordinal.le_of_nadd_le_nadd_left Ordinal.le_of_nadd_le_nadd_left
theorem le_of_nadd_le_nadd_right : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a → b ≤ c :=
@le_of_add_le_add_right NatOrdinal _ _ _
#align ordinal.le_of_nadd_le_nadd_right Ordinal.le_of_nadd_le_nadd_right
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left : ∀ (a) {b c}, a ♯ b < a ♯ c ↔ b < c :=
@add_lt_add_iff_left NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right : ∀ (a) {b c}, b ♯ a < c ♯ a ↔ b < c :=
@add_lt_add_iff_right NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right
theorem nadd_le_nadd_iff_left : ∀ (a) {b c}, a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
@add_le_add_iff_left NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_iff_left Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_iff_left
theorem nadd_le_nadd_iff_right : ∀ (a) {b c}, b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a ↔ b ≤ c :=
@_root_.add_le_add_iff_right NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_iff_right Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd_iff_right
theorem nadd_le_nadd : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a ♯ c ≤ b ♯ d :=
@add_le_add NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_le_nadd Ordinal.nadd_le_nadd
theorem nadd_lt_nadd : ∀ {a b c d}, a < b → c < d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le : ∀ {a b c d}, a < b → c ≤ d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c < d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt Ordinal.nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt
theorem nadd_left_cancel : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = a ♯ c → b = c :=
@_root_.add_left_cancel NatOrdinal _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_left_cancel Ordinal.nadd_left_cancel
theorem nadd_right_cancel : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = c ♯ b → a = c :=
@_root_.add_right_cancel NatOrdinal _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_right_cancel Ordinal.nadd_right_cancel
theorem nadd_left_cancel_iff : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = a ♯ c ↔ b = c :=
@add_left_cancel_iff NatOrdinal _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_left_cancel_iff Ordinal.nadd_left_cancel_iff
theorem nadd_right_cancel_iff : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a = c ♯ a ↔ b = c :=
@add_right_cancel_iff NatOrdinal _ _
#align ordinal.nadd_right_cancel_iff Ordinal.nadd_right_cancel_iff
theorem le_nadd_self {a b} : a ≤ b ♯ a := by simpa using nadd_le_nadd_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
#align ordinal.le_nadd_self Ordinal.le_nadd_self
theorem le_nadd_left {a b c} (h : a ≤ c) : a ≤ b ♯ c :=
le_nadd_self.trans (nadd_le_nadd_left h b)
#align ordinal.le_nadd_left Ordinal.le_nadd_left
theorem le_self_nadd {a b} : a ≤ a ♯ b := by simpa using nadd_le_nadd_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
#align ordinal.le_self_nadd Ordinal.le_self_nadd
theorem le_nadd_right {a b c} (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b ♯ c :=
le_self_nadd.trans (nadd_le_nadd_right h c)
#align ordinal.le_nadd_right Ordinal.le_nadd_right
theorem nadd_left_comm : ∀ a b c, a ♯ (b ♯ c) = b ♯ (a ♯ c) :=
@add_left_comm NatOrdinal _
#align ordinal.nadd_left_comm Ordinal.nadd_left_comm
theorem nadd_right_comm : ∀ a b c, a ♯ b ♯ c = a ♯ c ♯ b :=
@add_right_comm NatOrdinal _
#align ordinal.nadd_right_comm Ordinal.nadd_right_comm
/-! ### Natural multiplication -/
variable {a b c d : Ordinal.{u}}
theorem nmul_def (a b : Ordinal) :
a ⨳ b = sInf {c | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < c ♯ a' ⨳ b'} := by rw [nmul]
#align ordinal.nmul_def Ordinal.nmul_def
/-- The set in the definition of `nmul` is nonempty. -/
theorem nmul_nonempty (a b : Ordinal.{u}) :
{c : Ordinal.{u} | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < c ♯ a' ⨳ b'}.Nonempty :=
⟨_, fun _ ha _ hb => (lt_blsub₂.{u, u, u} _ ha hb).trans_le le_self_nadd⟩
#align ordinal.nmul_nonempty Ordinal.nmul_nonempty
theorem nmul_nadd_lt {a' b' : Ordinal} (ha : a' < a) (hb : b' < b) :
a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b' := by
rw [nmul_def a b]
exact csInf_mem (nmul_nonempty a b) a' ha b' hb
#align ordinal.nmul_nadd_lt Ordinal.nmul_nadd_lt
theorem nmul_nadd_le {a' b' : Ordinal} (ha : a' ≤ a) (hb : b' ≤ b) :
a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' ≤ a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b' := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with (ha | rfl)
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hb with (hb | rfl)
· exact (nmul_nadd_lt ha hb).le
· rw [nadd_comm]
· exact le_rfl
#align ordinal.nmul_nadd_le Ordinal.nmul_nadd_le
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/NaturalOps.lean | 538 | 544 | theorem lt_nmul_iff : c < a ⨳ b ↔ ∃ a' < a, ∃ b' < b, c ♯ a' ⨳ b' ≤ a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [nmul] at h
simpa using not_mem_of_lt_csInf h ⟨0, fun _ _ => bot_le⟩
· rintro ⟨a', ha, b', hb, h⟩
have := h.trans_lt (nmul_nadd_lt ha hb)
rwa [nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right] at this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
#align_import topology.metric_space.gluing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e1a7bdeb4fd826b7e71d130d34988f0a2d26a177"
/-!
# Metric space gluing
Gluing two metric spaces along a common subset. Formally, we are given
```
Φ
Z ---> X
|
|Ψ
v
Y
```
where `hΦ : Isometry Φ` and `hΨ : Isometry Ψ`.
We want to complete the square by a space `GlueSpacescan hΦ hΨ` and two isometries
`toGlueL hΦ hΨ` and `toGlueR hΦ hΨ` that make the square commute.
We start by defining a predistance on the disjoint union `X ⊕ Y`, for which
points `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance 0. The (quotient) metric space associated
to this predistance is the desired space.
This is an instance of a more general construction, where `Φ` and `Ψ` do not have to be isometries,
but the distances in the image almost coincide, up to `2ε` say. Then one can almost glue the two
spaces so that the images of a point under `Φ` and `Ψ` are `ε`-close. If `ε > 0`, this yields a
metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, without the need to take a quotient. In particular,
this gives a natural metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, where the basepoints
are at distance 1, say, and the distances between other points are obtained by going through the two
basepoints.
(We also register the same metric space structure on a general disjoint union `Σ i, E i`).
We also define the inductive limit of metric spaces. Given
```
f 0 f 1 f 2 f 3
X 0 -----> X 1 -----> X 2 -----> X 3 -----> ...
```
where the `X n` are metric spaces and `f n` isometric embeddings, we define the inductive
limit of the `X n`, also known as the increasing union of the `X n` in this context, if we
identify `X n` and `X (n+1)` through `f n`. This is a metric space in which all `X n` embed
isometrically and in a way compatible with `f n`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
open Function Set Uniformity Topology
namespace Metric
section ApproxGluing
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y] {Φ : Z → X} {Ψ : Z → Y} {ε : ℝ}
/-- Define a predistance on `X ⊕ Y`, for which `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance `ε` -/
def glueDist (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : Sum X Y → Sum X Y → ℝ
| .inl x, .inl y => dist x y
| .inr x, .inr y => dist x y
| .inl x, .inr y => (⨅ p, dist x (Φ p) + dist y (Ψ p)) + ε
| .inr x, .inl y => (⨅ p, dist y (Φ p) + dist x (Ψ p)) + ε
#align metric.glue_dist Metric.glueDist
private theorem glueDist_self (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : ∀ x, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x x = 0
| .inl _ => dist_self _
| .inr _ => dist_self _
theorem glueDist_glued_points [Nonempty Z] (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (p : Z) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl (Φ p)) (.inr (Ψ p)) = ε := by
have : ⨅ q, dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) = 0 := by
have A : ∀ q, 0 ≤ dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) := fun _ =>
add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_ciInf A)
have : 0 = dist (Φ p) (Φ p) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ p) := by simp
rw [this]
exact ciInf_le ⟨0, forall_mem_range.2 A⟩ p
simp only [glueDist, this, zero_add]
#align metric.glue_dist_glued_points Metric.glueDist_glued_points
private theorem glueDist_comm (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) :
∀ x y, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y = glueDist Φ Ψ ε y x
| .inl _, .inl _ => dist_comm _ _
| .inr _, .inr _ => dist_comm _ _
| .inl _, .inr _ => rfl
| .inr _, .inl _ => rfl
theorem glueDist_swap (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) :
∀ x y, glueDist Ψ Φ ε x.swap y.swap = glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y
| .inl _, .inl _ => rfl
| .inr _, .inr _ => rfl
| .inl _, .inr _ => by simp only [glueDist, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr, dist_comm, add_comm]
| .inr _, .inl _ => by simp only [glueDist, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr, dist_comm, add_comm]
theorem le_glueDist_inl_inr (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x y) :
ε ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left <| Real.iInf_nonneg fun _ => add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Gluing.lean | 106 | 108 | theorem le_glueDist_inr_inl (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x y) :
ε ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr x) (.inl y) := by |
rw [glueDist_comm]; apply le_glueDist_inl_inr
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.function.ae_eq_of_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"915591b2bb3ea303648db07284a161a7f2a9e3d4"
/-! # From equality of integrals to equality of functions
This file provides various statements of the general form "if two functions have the same integral
on all sets, then they are equal almost everywhere".
The different lemmas use various hypotheses on the class of functions, on the target space or on the
possible finiteness of the measure.
## Main statements
All results listed below apply to two functions `f, g`, together with two main hypotheses,
* `f` and `g` are integrable on all measurable sets with finite measure,
* for all measurable sets `s` with finite measure, `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ`.
The conclusion is then `f =ᵐ[μ] g`. The main lemmas are:
* `ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite`: case of a sigma-finite measure.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for functions which are
`AEFinStronglyMeasurable`.
* `Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for elements of `Lp`, for `0 < p < ∞`.
* `Integrable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for integrable functions.
For each of these results, we also provide a lemma about the equality of one function and 0. For
example, `Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero`.
We also register the corresponding lemma for integrals of `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions, in
`ae_eq_of_forall_set_lintegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite`.
Generally useful lemmas which are not related to integrals:
* `ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner`: if for all constants `c`, `fun x => inner c (f x) =ᵐ[μ] 0` then
`f =ᵐ[μ] 0`.
* `ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual`: if for all constants `c` in the dual space,
`fun x => c (f x) =ᵐ[μ] 0` then `f =ᵐ[μ] 0`.
-/
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace NormedSpace Filter
open scoped ENNReal NNReal MeasureTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
section AeEqOfForall
variable {α E 𝕜 : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [RCLike 𝕜]
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ c : E, (fun x => (inner c (f x) : 𝕜)) =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let s := denseSeq E
have hs : DenseRange s := denseRange_denseSeq E
have hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, inner (s n) (f x) = (0 : 𝕜) := ae_all_iff.mpr fun n => hf (s n)
refine hf'.mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have h_closed : IsClosed {c : E | inner c (f x) = (0 : 𝕜)} :=
isClosed_eq (continuous_id.inner continuous_const) continuous_const
exact @isClosed_property ℕ E _ s (fun c => inner c (f x) = (0 : 𝕜)) hs h_closed (fun n => hx n) _
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner MeasureTheory.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => y x
variable (𝕜)
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{t : Set E} (ht : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable t) {f : α → E}
(hf : ∀ c : Dual 𝕜 E, (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) =ᵐ[μ] 0) (h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ t) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rcases ht with ⟨d, d_count, hd⟩
haveI : Encodable d := d_count.toEncodable
have : ∀ x : d, ∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ‖g‖ ≤ 1 ∧ g x = ‖(x : E)‖ :=
fun x => exists_dual_vector'' 𝕜 (x : E)
choose s hs using this
have A : ∀ a : E, a ∈ t → (∀ x, ⟪a, s x⟫ = (0 : 𝕜)) → a = 0 := by
intro a hat ha
contrapose! ha
have a_pos : 0 < ‖a‖ := by simp only [ha, norm_pos_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
have a_mem : a ∈ closure d := hd hat
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x : d, dist a x < ‖a‖ / 2 := by
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 a_mem (‖a‖ / 2) (half_pos a_pos) with ⟨x, h'x, hx⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h'x⟩, hx⟩
use x
have I : ‖a‖ / 2 < ‖(x : E)‖ := by
have : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖(x : E)‖ + ‖a - x‖ := norm_le_insert' _ _
have : ‖a - x‖ < ‖a‖ / 2 := by rwa [dist_eq_norm] at hx
linarith
intro h
apply lt_irrefl ‖s x x‖
calc
‖s x x‖ = ‖s x (x - a)‖ := by simp only [h, sub_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_sub]
_ ≤ 1 * ‖(x : E) - a‖ := ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (hs x).1 _
_ < ‖a‖ / 2 := by rw [one_mul]; rwa [dist_eq_norm'] at hx
_ < ‖(x : E)‖ := I
_ = ‖s x x‖ := by rw [(hs x).2, RCLike.norm_coe_norm]
have hfs : ∀ y : d, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ⟪f x, s y⟫ = (0 : 𝕜) := fun y => hf (s y)
have hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ y : d, ⟪f x, s y⟫ = (0 : 𝕜) := by rwa [ae_all_iff]
filter_upwards [hf', h't] with x hx h'x
exact A (f x) h'x hx
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_is_separable MeasureTheory.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ c : Dual 𝕜 E, (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable 𝕜 (.of_separableSpace Set.univ) hf
(eventually_of_forall fun _ => Set.mem_univ _)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual MeasureTheory.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual
variable {𝕜}
end AeEqOfForall
variable {α E : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section AeEqOfForallSetIntegralEq
theorem ae_const_le_iff_forall_lt_measure_zero {β} [LinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] [FirstCountableTopology β] (f : α → β) (c : β) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, c ≤ f x) ↔ ∀ b < c, μ {x | f x ≤ b} = 0 := by
rw [ae_iff]
push_neg
constructor
· intro h b hb
exact measure_mono_null (fun y hy => (lt_of_le_of_lt hy hb : _)) h
intro hc
by_cases h : ∀ b, c ≤ b
· have : {a : α | f a < c} = ∅ := by
apply Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => ?_
exact (lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_lt_of_le hx (h (f x)))).elim
simp [this]
by_cases H : ¬IsLUB (Set.Iio c) c
· have : c ∈ upperBounds (Set.Iio c) := fun y hy => le_of_lt hy
obtain ⟨b, b_up, bc⟩ : ∃ b : β, b ∈ upperBounds (Set.Iio c) ∧ b < c := by
simpa [IsLUB, IsLeast, this, lowerBounds] using H
exact measure_mono_null (fun x hx => b_up hx) (hc b bc)
push_neg at H h
obtain ⟨u, _, u_lt, u_lim, -⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → β,
StrictMono u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, u n < c) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 c) ∧ ∀ n : ℕ, u n ∈ Set.Iio c :=
H.exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto_of_not_mem (lt_irrefl c) h
have h_Union : {x | f x < c} = ⋃ n : ℕ, {x | f x ≤ u n} := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).1 _ h).exists; exact ⟨n, hn.le⟩
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h; exact hn.trans_lt (u_lt _)
rw [h_Union, measure_iUnion_null_iff]
intro n
exact hc _ (u_lt n)
#align measure_theory.ae_const_le_iff_forall_lt_measure_zero MeasureTheory.ae_const_le_iff_forall_lt_measure_zero
section ENNReal
open scoped Topology
theorem ae_le_of_forall_set_lintegral_le_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
have A :
∀ (ε N : ℝ≥0) (p : ℕ), 0 < ε → μ ({x | g x + ε ≤ f x ∧ g x ≤ N} ∩ spanningSets μ p) = 0 := by
intro ε N p εpos
let s := {x | g x + ε ≤ f x ∧ g x ≤ N} ∩ spanningSets μ p
have s_meas : MeasurableSet s := by
have A : MeasurableSet {x | g x + ε ≤ f x} := measurableSet_le (hg.add measurable_const) hf
have B : MeasurableSet {x | g x ≤ N} := measurableSet_le hg measurable_const
exact (A.inter B).inter (measurable_spanningSets μ p)
have s_lt_top : μ s < ∞ :=
(measure_mono (Set.inter_subset_right)).trans_lt (measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ p)
have A : (∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) + ε * μ s ≤ (∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) + 0 :=
calc
(∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) + ε * μ s = (∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) + ∫⁻ _ in s, ε ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral_const, Set.univ_inter, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply]
_ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x + ε ∂μ := (lintegral_add_right _ measurable_const).symm
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
(set_lintegral_mono (hg.add measurable_const) hf fun x hx => hx.1.1)
_ ≤ (∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) + 0 := by rw [add_zero]; exact h s s_meas s_lt_top
have B : (∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) ≠ ∞ := by
apply ne_of_lt
calc
(∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ _ in s, N ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono hg measurable_const fun x hx => hx.1.2
_ = N * μ s := by
simp only [lintegral_const, Set.univ_inter, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply]
_ < ∞ := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, s_lt_top.ne, and_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_ne_top,
ENNReal.mul_eq_top, Ne, not_false_iff, false_and_iff, or_self_iff]
have : (ε : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ 0 := ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_left B A
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, εpos.ne', false_or_iff]
obtain ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ≥0, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ≥0)
let s := fun n : ℕ => {x | g x + u n ≤ f x ∧ g x ≤ (n : ℝ≥0)} ∩ spanningSets μ n
have μs : ∀ n, μ (s n) = 0 := fun n => A _ _ _ (u_pos n)
have B : {x | f x ≤ g x}ᶜ ⊆ ⋃ n, s n := by
intro x hx
simp only [Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf, not_le] at hx
have L1 : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, g x + u n ≤ f x := by
have : Tendsto (fun n => g x + u n) atTop (𝓝 (g x + (0 : ℝ≥0))) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.add (ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 u_lim)
simp only [ENNReal.coe_zero, add_zero] at this
exact eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt hx this
have L2 : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in (atTop : Filter ℕ), g x ≤ (n : ℝ≥0) :=
haveI : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞)) atTop (𝓝 ∞) := by
simp only [ENNReal.coe_natCast]
exact ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt (hx.trans_le le_top) this
apply Set.mem_iUnion.2
exact ((L1.and L2).and (eventually_mem_spanningSets μ x)).exists
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ {x : α | (fun x : α => f x ≤ g x) x}ᶜ ≤ μ (⋃ n, s n) := measure_mono B
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (s n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = 0 := by simp only [μs, tsum_zero]
#align measure_theory.ae_le_of_forall_set_lintegral_le_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.ae_le_of_forall_set_lintegral_le_of_sigmaFinite
theorem ae_le_of_forall_set_lintegral_le_of_sigmaFinite₀ [SigmaFinite μ]
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
have h' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫⁻ x in s, hf.mk f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, hg.mk g x ∂μ := by
refine fun s hs hμs ↦ (set_lintegral_congr_fun hs ?_).trans_le
((h s hs hμs).trans_eq (set_lintegral_congr_fun hs ?_))
· filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with a ha using fun _ ↦ ha.symm
· filter_upwards [hg.ae_eq_mk] with a ha using fun _ ↦ ha
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk, hg.ae_eq_mk,
ae_le_of_forall_set_lintegral_le_of_sigmaFinite hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk h']
with a haf hag ha
rwa [haf, hag]
theorem ae_eq_of_forall_set_lintegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite₀ [SigmaFinite μ]
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have A : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
ae_le_of_forall_set_lintegral_le_of_sigmaFinite₀ hf hg fun s hs h's => le_of_eq (h s hs h's)
have B : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f :=
ae_le_of_forall_set_lintegral_le_of_sigmaFinite₀ hg hf fun s hs h's => ge_of_eq (h s hs h's)
filter_upwards [A, B] with x using le_antisymm
theorem ae_eq_of_forall_set_lintegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
ae_eq_of_forall_set_lintegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite₀ hf.aemeasurable hg.aemeasurable h
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_forall_set_lintegral_eq_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_forall_set_lintegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite
end ENNReal
section Real
variable {f : α → ℝ}
/-- Don't use this lemma. Use `ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg`. -/
theorem ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_stronglyMeasurable (hfm : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) :
0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
simp_rw [EventuallyLE, Pi.zero_apply]
rw [ae_const_le_iff_forall_lt_measure_zero]
intro b hb_neg
let s := {x | f x ≤ b}
have hs : MeasurableSet s := hfm.measurableSet_le stronglyMeasurable_const
have mus : μ s < ∞ := Integrable.measure_le_lt_top hf hb_neg
have h_int_gt : (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ b * (μ s).toReal := by
have h_const_le : (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫ _ in s, b ∂μ := by
refine
setIntegral_mono_ae_restrict hf.integrableOn (integrableOn_const.mpr (Or.inr mus)) ?_
rw [EventuallyLE, ae_restrict_iff hs]
exact eventually_of_forall fun x hxs => hxs
rwa [setIntegral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm] at h_const_le
by_contra h
refine (lt_self_iff_false (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)).mp (h_int_gt.trans_lt ?_)
refine (mul_neg_iff.mpr (Or.inr ⟨hb_neg, ?_⟩)).trans_le ?_
swap
· exact hf_zero s hs mus
refine ENNReal.toReal_nonneg.lt_of_ne fun h_eq => h ?_
cases' (ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff _).mp h_eq.symm with hμs_eq_zero hμs_eq_top
· exact hμs_eq_zero
· exact absurd hμs_eq_top mus.ne
#align measure_theory.ae_nonneg_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_stronglyMeasurable
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_nonneg_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg_of_stronglyMeasurable :=
ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
rcases hf.1 with ⟨f', hf'_meas, hf_ae⟩
have hf'_integrable : Integrable f' μ := Integrable.congr hf hf_ae
have hf'_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f' x ∂μ := by
intro s hs h's
rw [setIntegral_congr_ae hs (hf_ae.mono fun x hx _ => hx.symm)]
exact hf_zero s hs h's
exact
(ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_stronglyMeasurable hf'_meas hf'_integrable
hf'_zero).trans
hf_ae.symm.le
#align measure_theory.ae_nonneg_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg MeasureTheory.ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_nonneg_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg :=
ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
theorem ae_le_of_forall_setIntegral_le {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf_le : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← eventually_sub_nonneg]
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (hg.sub hf) fun s hs => ?_
rw [integral_sub' hg.integrableOn hf.integrableOn, sub_nonneg]
exact hf_le s hs
#align measure_theory.ae_le_of_forall_set_integral_le MeasureTheory.ae_le_of_forall_setIntegral_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_le_of_forall_set_integral_le := ae_le_of_forall_setIntegral_le
theorem ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter {f : α → ℝ} {t : Set α}
(hf : IntegrableOn f t μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ (s ∩ t) < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s ∩ t, f x ∂μ) :
0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f := by
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg hf fun s hs h's => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
apply hf_zero s hs
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at h's
#align measure_theory.ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg_inter MeasureTheory.ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg_inter :=
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter
theorem ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
apply ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict
intro t t_meas t_lt_top
apply ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter (hf_int_finite t t_meas t_lt_top)
intro s s_meas _
exact
hf_zero _ (s_meas.inter t_meas)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (Set.inter_subset_right)) t_lt_top)
#align measure_theory.ae_nonneg_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_nonneg_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite :=
ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
let t := hf.sigmaFiniteSet
suffices 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this hf.ae_eq_zero_compl.symm.le
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := hf.sigmaFinite_restrict
refine
ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite (fun s hs hμts => ?_) fun s hs hμts => ?_
· rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμts
exact hf_int_finite (s ∩ t) (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμts
· rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμts
exact hf_zero (s ∩ t) (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμts
#align measure_theory.ae_fin_strongly_measurable.ae_nonneg_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg MeasureTheory.AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_nonneg_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
theorem ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f := by
refine
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter
(hf_int_finite t ht (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hμt)) fun s hs _ => ?_
refine hf_zero (s ∩ t) (hs.inter ht) ?_
exact (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_right).trans_lt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hμt)
#align measure_theory.ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg MeasureTheory.ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_nonneg :=
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
theorem ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero_real {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 := by
suffices h_and : f ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 ∧ 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f from
h_and.1.mp (h_and.2.mono fun x hx1 hx2 => le_antisymm hx2 hx1)
refine
⟨?_,
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg hf_int_finite
(fun s hs hμs => (hf_zero s hs hμs).symm.le) ht hμt⟩
suffices h_neg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] -f by
refine h_neg.mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.neg_apply] at hx
simpa using hx
refine
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (fun s hs hμs => (hf_int_finite s hs hμs).neg)
(fun s hs hμs => ?_) ht hμt
simp_rw [Pi.neg_apply]
rw [integral_neg, neg_nonneg]
exact (hf_zero s hs hμs).le
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_eq_zero_real MeasureTheory.ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero_real
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_eq_zero_real :=
ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero_real
end Real
theorem ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 := by
rcases (hf_int_finite t ht hμt.lt_top).aestronglyMeasurable.isSeparable_ae_range with
⟨u, u_sep, hu⟩
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable ℝ u_sep (fun c => ?_) hu
refine ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero_real ?_ ?_ ht hμt
· intro s hs hμs
exact ContinuousLinearMap.integrable_comp c (hf_int_finite s hs hμs)
· intro s hs hμs
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm c (hf_int_finite s hs hμs), hf_zero s hs hμs]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero _
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_eq_zero MeasureTheory.ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_eq_zero :=
ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg' : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)]
exact sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_zero s hs hμs)
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hfg_int hfg' ht hμt
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.ae_eq_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_eq_restrict_of_forall_set_integral_eq :=
ae_eq_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let S := spanningSets μ
rw [← @Measure.restrict_univ _ _ μ, ← iUnion_spanningSets μ, EventuallyEq, ae_iff,
Measure.restrict_apply' (MeasurableSet.iUnion (measurable_spanningSets μ))]
rw [Set.inter_iUnion, measure_iUnion_null_iff]
intro n
have h_meas_n : MeasurableSet (S n) := measurable_spanningSets μ n
have hμn : μ (S n) < ∞ := measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ n
rw [← Measure.restrict_apply' h_meas_n]
exact ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hf_int_finite hf_zero h_meas_n hμn.ne
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_set_integral_eq_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_eq_zero_of_forall_set_integral_eq_of_sigmaFinite :=
ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite
theorem ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs),
sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_eq s hs hμs)]
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite hfg_int hfg
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_forall_set_integral_eq_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_eq_of_forall_set_integral_eq_of_sigmaFinite :=
ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0)
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let t := hf.sigmaFiniteSet
suffices f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this hf.ae_eq_zero_compl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := hf.sigmaFinite_restrict
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite ?_ ?_
· intro s hs hμs
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμs
exact hf_int_finite _ (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμs
· intro s hs hμs
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμs
exact hf_zero _ (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμs
#align measure_theory.ae_fin_strongly_measurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_set_integral_eq_zero MeasureTheory.AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_set_integral_eq_zero :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ)
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEFinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs),
sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_eq s hs hμs)]
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact (hf.sub hg).ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hfg_int hfg
#align measure_theory.ae_fin_strongly_measurable.ae_eq_of_forall_set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_set_integral_eq :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
theorem Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero (f : Lp E p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hf_int_finite hf_zero
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_set_integral_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_set_integral_eq_zero :=
Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero
theorem Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq (f g : Lp E p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hf_int_finite hg_int_finite hfg
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_set_integral_eq := Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEEqOfIntegral.lean | 559 | 585 | theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_finStronglyMeasurable_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0)
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f (μ.trim hm)) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by |
obtain ⟨t, ht_meas, htf_zero, htμ⟩ := hf.exists_set_sigmaFinite
haveI : SigmaFinite ((μ.restrict t).trim hm) := by rwa [restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas] at htμ
have htf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0 := by
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' (MeasurableSet.compl (hm _ ht_meas))]
exact eventually_of_forall htf_zero
have hf_meas_m : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := hf.stronglyMeasurable
suffices f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this htf_zero
refine measure_eq_zero_of_trim_eq_zero hm ?_
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite ?_ ?_
· intro s hs hμs
unfold IntegrableOn
rw [restrict_trim hm (μ.restrict t) hs, Measure.restrict_restrict (hm s hs)]
rw [← restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas, Measure.restrict_apply hs,
trim_measurableSet_eq hm (hs.inter ht_meas)] at hμs
refine Integrable.trim hm ?_ hf_meas_m
exact hf_int_finite _ (hs.inter ht_meas) hμs
· intro s hs hμs
rw [restrict_trim hm (μ.restrict t) hs, Measure.restrict_restrict (hm s hs)]
rw [← restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas, Measure.restrict_apply hs,
trim_measurableSet_eq hm (hs.inter ht_meas)] at hμs
rw [← integral_trim hm hf_meas_m]
exact hf_zero _ (hs.inter ht_meas) hμs
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Completion
#align_import data.real.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cb42593171ba005beaaf4549fcfe0dece9ada4c9"
/-!
# Real numbers from Cauchy sequences
This file defines `ℝ` as the type of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers.
This choice is motivated by how easy it is to prove that `ℝ` is a commutative ring, by simply
lifting everything to `ℚ`.
The facts that the real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring,
and a conditionally complete linear order,
have been deferred to the file `Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean`,
in order to keep the imports here simple.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
assert_not_exists Module
assert_not_exists Submonoid
assert_not_exists FloorRing
/-- The type `ℝ` of real numbers constructed as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational
numbers. -/
structure Real where ofCauchy ::
/-- The underlying Cauchy completion -/
cauchy : CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ)
#align real Real
@[inherit_doc]
notation "ℝ" => Real
-- Porting note: unknown attribute
-- attribute [pp_using_anonymous_constructor] Real
namespace CauSeq.Completion
-- this can't go in `Data.Real.CauSeqCompletion` as the structure on `ℚ` isn't available
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_rat {abv : ℚ → ℚ} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] (q : ℚ) :
ofRat (q : ℚ) = (q : Cauchy abv) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_rat CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_rat
end CauSeq.Completion
namespace Real
open CauSeq CauSeq.Completion
variable {x y : ℝ}
theorem ext_cauchy_iff : ∀ {x y : Real}, x = y ↔ x.cauchy = y.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by rw [ofCauchy.injEq]
#align real.ext_cauchy_iff Real.ext_cauchy_iff
theorem ext_cauchy {x y : Real} : x.cauchy = y.cauchy → x = y :=
ext_cauchy_iff.2
#align real.ext_cauchy Real.ext_cauchy
/-- The real numbers are isomorphic to the quotient of Cauchy sequences on the rationals. -/
def equivCauchy : ℝ ≃ CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
⟨Real.cauchy, Real.ofCauchy, fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align real.equiv_Cauchy Real.equivCauchy
-- irreducible doesn't work for instances: https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/511
private irreducible_def zero : ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
private irreducible_def one : ℝ :=
⟨1⟩
private irreducible_def add : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
private noncomputable irreducible_def inv' : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨a⁻¹⟩
instance : Zero ℝ :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One ℝ :=
⟨one⟩
instance : Add ℝ :=
⟨add⟩
instance : Neg ℝ :=
⟨neg⟩
instance : Mul ℝ :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : Sub ℝ :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
noncomputable instance : Inv ℝ :=
⟨inv'⟩
theorem ofCauchy_zero : (⟨0⟩ : ℝ) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
#align real.of_cauchy_zero Real.ofCauchy_zero
theorem ofCauchy_one : (⟨1⟩ : ℝ) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
#align real.of_cauchy_one Real.ofCauchy_one
theorem ofCauchy_add (a b) : (⟨a + b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
(add_def _ _).symm
#align real.of_cauchy_add Real.ofCauchy_add
theorem ofCauchy_neg (a) : (⟨-a⟩ : ℝ) = -⟨a⟩ :=
(neg_def _).symm
#align real.of_cauchy_neg Real.ofCauchy_neg
theorem ofCauchy_sub (a b) : (⟨a - b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofCauchy_add, ofCauchy_neg]
rfl
#align real.of_cauchy_sub Real.ofCauchy_sub
theorem ofCauchy_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
#align real.of_cauchy_mul Real.ofCauchy_mul
theorem ofCauchy_inv {f} : (⟨f⁻¹⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨f⟩⁻¹ :=
show _ = inv' _ by rw [inv']
#align real.of_cauchy_inv Real.ofCauchy_inv
theorem cauchy_zero : (0 : ℝ).cauchy = 0 :=
show zero.cauchy = 0 by rw [zero_def]
#align real.cauchy_zero Real.cauchy_zero
theorem cauchy_one : (1 : ℝ).cauchy = 1 :=
show one.cauchy = 1 by rw [one_def]
#align real.cauchy_one Real.cauchy_one
theorem cauchy_add : ∀ a b, (a + b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy + b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (add _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [add_def]
#align real.cauchy_add Real.cauchy_add
theorem cauchy_neg : ∀ a, (-a : ℝ).cauchy = -a.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩ => show (neg _).cauchy = _ by rw [neg_def]
#align real.cauchy_neg Real.cauchy_neg
theorem cauchy_mul : ∀ a b, (a * b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy * b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (mul _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [mul_def]
#align real.cauchy_mul Real.cauchy_mul
theorem cauchy_sub : ∀ a b, (a - b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy - b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← cauchy_neg, ← cauchy_add]
rfl
#align real.cauchy_sub Real.cauchy_sub
theorem cauchy_inv : ∀ f, (f⁻¹ : ℝ).cauchy = f.cauchy⁻¹
| ⟨f⟩ => show (inv' _).cauchy = _ by rw [inv']
#align real.cauchy_inv Real.cauchy_inv
instance instNatCast : NatCast ℝ where natCast n := ⟨n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast ℝ where intCast z := ⟨z⟩
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℝ where nnratCast q := ⟨q⟩
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℝ where ratCast q := ⟨q⟩
lemma ofCauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : ℝ) = n := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (⟨z⟩ : ℝ) = z := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
#align real.of_cauchy_nat_cast Real.ofCauchy_natCast
#align real.of_cauchy_int_cast Real.ofCauchy_intCast
#align real.of_cauchy_rat_cast Real.ofCauchy_ratCast
lemma cauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ).cauchy = n := rfl
lemma cauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (z : ℝ).cauchy = z := rfl
lemma cauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
#align real.cauchy_nat_cast Real.cauchy_natCast
#align real.cauchy_int_cast Real.cauchy_intCast
#align real.cauchy_rat_cast Real.cauchy_ratCast
instance commRing : CommRing ℝ where
natCast n := ⟨n⟩
intCast z := ⟨z⟩
zero := (0 : ℝ)
one := (1 : ℝ)
mul := (· * ·)
add := (· + ·)
neg := @Neg.neg ℝ _
sub := @Sub.sub ℝ _
npow := @npowRec ℝ ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
nsmul := @nsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨@Neg.neg ℝ _⟩ (@nsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_zero a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_zero]
zero_add a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_zero]
add_comm a b := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, add_comm]
add_assoc a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, add_assoc]
mul_zero a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_zero]
zero_mul a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_zero]
mul_one a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_one]
one_mul a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_one]
mul_comm a b := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_mul, mul_comm]
mul_assoc a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_mul, mul_assoc]
left_distrib a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, cauchy_mul, mul_add]
right_distrib a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, cauchy_mul, add_mul]
add_left_neg a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_neg, cauchy_zero]
natCast_zero := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_zero]
natCast_succ n := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_one, cauchy_add]
intCast_negSucc z := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_neg, cauchy_natCast]
/-- `Real.equivCauchy` as a ring equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def ringEquivCauchy : ℝ ≃+* CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
{ equivCauchy with
toFun := cauchy
invFun := ofCauchy
map_add' := cauchy_add
map_mul' := cauchy_mul }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align real.ring_equiv_Cauchy Real.ringEquivCauchy
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align real.ring_equiv_Cauchy_apply Real.ringEquivCauchy_apply
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align real.ring_equiv_Cauchy_symm_apply_cauchy Real.ringEquivCauchy_symm_apply_cauchy
/-! Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution.
These short-circuits have an additional property of ensuring that a computable path is found; if
`Field ℝ` is found first, then decaying it to these typeclasses would result in a `noncomputable`
version of them. -/
instance instRing : Ring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance semiring : Semiring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoidWithZero ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : MonoidWithZero ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddLeftCancelSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddRightCancelSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Inhabited ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The real numbers are a `*`-ring, with the trivial `*`-structure. -/
instance : StarRing ℝ :=
starRingOfComm
instance : TrivialStar ℝ :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Make a real number from a Cauchy sequence of rationals (by taking the equivalence class). -/
def mk (x : CauSeq ℚ abs) : ℝ :=
⟨CauSeq.Completion.mk x⟩
#align real.mk Real.mk
theorem mk_eq {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
ext_cauchy_iff.trans CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq
#align real.mk_eq Real.mk_eq
private irreducible_def lt : ℝ → ℝ → Prop
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ =>
(Quotient.liftOn₂ x y (· < ·)) fun _ _ _ _ hf hg =>
propext <|
⟨fun h => lt_of_eq_of_lt (Setoid.symm hf) (lt_of_lt_of_eq h hg), fun h =>
lt_of_eq_of_lt hf (lt_of_lt_of_eq h (Setoid.symm hg))⟩
instance : LT ℝ :=
⟨lt⟩
theorem lt_cauchy {f g} : (⟨⟦f⟧⟩ : ℝ) < ⟨⟦g⟧⟩ ↔ f < g :=
show lt _ _ ↔ _ by rw [lt_def]; rfl
#align real.lt_cauchy Real.lt_cauchy
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f < mk g ↔ f < g :=
lt_cauchy
#align real.mk_lt Real.mk_lt
theorem mk_zero : mk 0 = 0 := by rw [← ofCauchy_zero]; rfl
#align real.mk_zero Real.mk_zero
theorem mk_one : mk 1 = 1 := by rw [← ofCauchy_one]; rfl
#align real.mk_one Real.mk_one
theorem mk_add {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (f + g) = mk f + mk g := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_add]
#align real.mk_add Real.mk_add
theorem mk_mul {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (f * g) = mk f * mk g := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_mul]
#align real.mk_mul Real.mk_mul
theorem mk_neg {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (-f) = -mk f := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_neg]
#align real.mk_neg Real.mk_neg
@[simp]
theorem mk_pos {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : 0 < mk f ↔ Pos f := by
rw [← mk_zero, mk_lt]
exact iff_of_eq (congr_arg Pos (sub_zero f))
#align real.mk_pos Real.mk_pos
private irreducible_def le (x y : ℝ) : Prop :=
x < y ∨ x = y
instance : LE ℝ :=
⟨le⟩
private theorem le_def' {x y : ℝ} : x ≤ y ↔ x < y ∨ x = y :=
show le _ _ ↔ _ by rw [le_def]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Basic.lean | 347 | 348 | theorem mk_le {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f ≤ mk g ↔ f ≤ g := by |
simp only [le_def', mk_lt, mk_eq]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pairwise
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.clique from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3365b20c2ffa7c35e47e5209b89ba9abdddf3ffe"
/-!
# Graph cliques
This file defines cliques in simple graphs. A clique is a set of vertices that are pairwise
adjacent.
## Main declarations
* `SimpleGraph.IsClique`: Predicate for a set of vertices to be a clique.
* `SimpleGraph.IsNClique`: Predicate for a set of vertices to be an `n`-clique.
* `SimpleGraph.cliqueFinset`: Finset of `n`-cliques of a graph.
* `SimpleGraph.CliqueFree`: Predicate for a graph to have no `n`-cliques.
## TODO
* Clique numbers
* Dualise all the API to get independent sets
-/
open Finset Fintype Function SimpleGraph.Walk
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {α β : Type*} (G H : SimpleGraph α)
/-! ### Cliques -/
section Clique
variable {s t : Set α}
/-- A clique in a graph is a set of vertices that are pairwise adjacent. -/
abbrev IsClique (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Pairwise G.Adj
#align simple_graph.is_clique SimpleGraph.IsClique
theorem isClique_iff : G.IsClique s ↔ s.Pairwise G.Adj :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.is_clique_iff SimpleGraph.isClique_iff
/-- A clique is a set of vertices whose induced graph is complete. -/
theorem isClique_iff_induce_eq : G.IsClique s ↔ G.induce s = ⊤ := by
rw [isClique_iff]
constructor
· intro h
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp only [comap_adj, Subtype.coe_mk, top_adj, Ne, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
exact ⟨Adj.ne, h hv hw⟩
· intro h v hv w hw hne
have h2 : (G.induce s).Adj ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ = _ := rfl
conv_lhs at h2 => rw [h]
simp only [top_adj, ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, eq_iff_iff] at h2
exact h2.1 hne
#align simple_graph.is_clique_iff_induce_eq SimpleGraph.isClique_iff_induce_eq
instance [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {s : Finset α} : Decidable (G.IsClique s) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ G.isClique_iff
variable {G H} {a b : α}
lemma isClique_empty : G.IsClique ∅ := by simp
#align simple_graph.is_clique_empty SimpleGraph.isClique_empty
lemma isClique_singleton (a : α) : G.IsClique {a} := by simp
#align simple_graph.is_clique_singleton SimpleGraph.isClique_singleton
lemma isClique_pair : G.IsClique {a, b} ↔ a ≠ b → G.Adj a b := Set.pairwise_pair_of_symmetric G.symm
#align simple_graph.is_clique_pair SimpleGraph.isClique_pair
@[simp]
lemma isClique_insert : G.IsClique (insert a s) ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → G.Adj a b :=
Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric G.symm
#align simple_graph.is_clique_insert SimpleGraph.isClique_insert
lemma isClique_insert_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) :
G.IsClique (insert a s) ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, G.Adj a b :=
Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem G.symm ha
#align simple_graph.is_clique_insert_of_not_mem SimpleGraph.isClique_insert_of_not_mem
lemma IsClique.insert (hs : G.IsClique s) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → G.Adj a b) :
G.IsClique (insert a s) := hs.insert_of_symmetric G.symm h
#align simple_graph.is_clique.insert SimpleGraph.IsClique.insert
theorem IsClique.mono (h : G ≤ H) : G.IsClique s → H.IsClique s := Set.Pairwise.mono' h
#align simple_graph.is_clique.mono SimpleGraph.IsClique.mono
theorem IsClique.subset (h : t ⊆ s) : G.IsClique s → G.IsClique t := Set.Pairwise.mono h
#align simple_graph.is_clique.subset SimpleGraph.IsClique.subset
protected theorem IsClique.map {s : Set α} (h : G.IsClique s) {f : α ↪ β} :
(G.map f).IsClique (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ hab
exact ⟨a, b, h ha hb <| ne_of_apply_ne _ hab, rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.is_clique.map SimpleGraph.IsClique.map
@[simp]
theorem isClique_bot_iff : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).IsClique s ↔ (s : Set α).Subsingleton :=
Set.pairwise_bot_iff
#align simple_graph.is_clique_bot_iff SimpleGraph.isClique_bot_iff
alias ⟨IsClique.subsingleton, _⟩ := isClique_bot_iff
#align simple_graph.is_clique.subsingleton SimpleGraph.IsClique.subsingleton
end Clique
/-! ### `n`-cliques -/
section NClique
variable {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α}
/-- An `n`-clique in a graph is a set of `n` vertices which are pairwise connected. -/
structure IsNClique (n : ℕ) (s : Finset α) : Prop where
clique : G.IsClique s
card_eq : s.card = n
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique SimpleGraph.IsNClique
theorem isNClique_iff : G.IsNClique n s ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ s.card = n :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique_iff SimpleGraph.isNClique_iff
instance [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α} :
Decidable (G.IsNClique n s) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ G.isNClique_iff
variable {G H} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma isNClique_empty : G.IsNClique n ∅ ↔ n = 0 := by simp [isNClique_iff, eq_comm]
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique_empty SimpleGraph.isNClique_empty
@[simp]
lemma isNClique_singleton : G.IsNClique n {a} ↔ n = 1 := by simp [isNClique_iff, eq_comm]
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique_singleton SimpleGraph.isNClique_singleton
theorem IsNClique.mono (h : G ≤ H) : G.IsNClique n s → H.IsNClique n s := by
simp_rw [isNClique_iff]
exact And.imp_left (IsClique.mono h)
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique.mono SimpleGraph.IsNClique.mono
protected theorem IsNClique.map (h : G.IsNClique n s) {f : α ↪ β} :
(G.map f).IsNClique n (s.map f) :=
⟨by rw [coe_map]; exact h.1.map, (card_map _).trans h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique.map SimpleGraph.IsNClique.map
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_bot_iff : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).IsNClique n s ↔ n ≤ 1 ∧ s.card = n := by
rw [isNClique_iff, isClique_bot_iff]
refine and_congr_left ?_
rintro rfl
exact card_le_one.symm
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique_bot_iff SimpleGraph.isNClique_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_zero : G.IsNClique 0 s ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [isNClique_iff, Finset.card_eq_zero, and_iff_right_iff_imp]; rintro rfl; simp
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique_zero SimpleGraph.isNClique_zero
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_one : G.IsNClique 1 s ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
simp only [isNClique_iff, card_eq_one, and_iff_right_iff_imp]; rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; simp
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique_one SimpleGraph.isNClique_one
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem IsNClique.insert (hs : G.IsNClique n s) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, G.Adj a b) :
G.IsNClique (n + 1) (insert a s) := by
constructor
· push_cast
exact hs.1.insert fun b hb _ => h _ hb
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem fun ha => (h _ ha).ne rfl, hs.2]
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique.insert SimpleGraph.IsNClique.insert
theorem is3Clique_triple_iff : G.IsNClique 3 {a, b, c} ↔ G.Adj a b ∧ G.Adj a c ∧ G.Adj b c := by
simp only [isNClique_iff, isClique_iff, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric G.symm, coe_insert]
by_cases hab : a = b <;> by_cases hbc : b = c <;> by_cases hac : a = c <;> subst_vars <;>
simp [G.ne_of_adj, and_rotate, *]
#align simple_graph.is_3_clique_triple_iff SimpleGraph.is3Clique_triple_iff
theorem is3Clique_iff :
G.IsNClique 3 s ↔ ∃ a b c, G.Adj a b ∧ G.Adj a c ∧ G.Adj b c ∧ s = {a, b, c} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, b, c, -, -, -, hs⟩ := card_eq_three.1 h.card_eq
refine ⟨a, b, c, ?_⟩
rwa [hs, eq_self_iff_true, and_true, is3Clique_triple_iff.symm, ← hs]
· rintro ⟨a, b, c, hab, hbc, hca, rfl⟩
exact is3Clique_triple_iff.2 ⟨hab, hbc, hca⟩
#align simple_graph.is_3_clique_iff SimpleGraph.is3Clique_iff
end DecidableEq
theorem is3Clique_iff_exists_cycle_length_three :
(∃ s : Finset α, G.IsNClique 3 s) ↔ ∃ (u : α) (w : G.Walk u u), w.IsCycle ∧ w.length = 3 := by
classical
simp_rw [is3Clique_iff, isCycle_def]
exact
⟨(fun ⟨_, a, _, _, hab, hac, hbc, _⟩ => ⟨a, cons hab (cons hbc (cons hac.symm nil)), by aesop⟩),
(fun ⟨_, .cons hab (.cons hbc (.cons hca nil)), _, _⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, _, hab, hca.symm, hbc, rfl⟩)⟩
end NClique
/-! ### Graphs without cliques -/
section CliqueFree
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- `G.CliqueFree n` means that `G` has no `n`-cliques. -/
def CliqueFree (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ t, ¬G.IsNClique n t
#align simple_graph.clique_free SimpleGraph.CliqueFree
variable {G H} {s : Finset α}
theorem IsNClique.not_cliqueFree (hG : G.IsNClique n s) : ¬G.CliqueFree n :=
fun h ↦ h _ hG
#align simple_graph.is_n_clique.not_clique_free SimpleGraph.IsNClique.not_cliqueFree
theorem not_cliqueFree_of_top_embedding {n : ℕ} (f : (⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) ↪g G) :
¬G.CliqueFree n := by
simp only [CliqueFree, isNClique_iff, isClique_iff_induce_eq, not_forall, Classical.not_not]
use Finset.univ.map f.toEmbedding
simp only [card_map, Finset.card_fin, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff]
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp only [coe_map, Set.mem_image, coe_univ, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff] at hv hw
obtain ⟨v', rfl⟩ := hv
obtain ⟨w', rfl⟩ := hw
simp only [coe_sort_coe, RelEmbedding.coe_toEmbedding, comap_adj, Function.Embedding.coe_subtype,
f.map_adj_iff, top_adj, ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, RelEmbedding.inj]
-- This used to be the end of the proof before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [Function.Embedding.coe_subtype, f.map_adj_iff]
simp
#align simple_graph.not_clique_free_of_top_embedding SimpleGraph.not_cliqueFree_of_top_embedding
/-- An embedding of a complete graph that witnesses the fact that the graph is not clique-free. -/
noncomputable def topEmbeddingOfNotCliqueFree {n : ℕ} (h : ¬G.CliqueFree n) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) ↪g G := by
simp only [CliqueFree, isNClique_iff, isClique_iff_induce_eq, not_forall, Classical.not_not] at h
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := h.choose_spec
have : (⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin h.choose.card)) ≃g (⊤ : SimpleGraph h.choose) := by
apply Iso.completeGraph
simpa using (Fintype.equivFin h.choose).symm
rw [← ha] at this
convert (Embedding.induce ↑h.choose.toSet).comp this.toEmbedding
exact hb.symm
#align simple_graph.top_embedding_of_not_clique_free SimpleGraph.topEmbeddingOfNotCliqueFree
theorem not_cliqueFree_iff (n : ℕ) : ¬G.CliqueFree n ↔ Nonempty ((⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) ↪g G) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨topEmbeddingOfNotCliqueFree h⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ not_cliqueFree_of_top_embedding f⟩
#align simple_graph.not_clique_free_iff SimpleGraph.not_cliqueFree_iff
theorem cliqueFree_iff {n : ℕ} : G.CliqueFree n ↔ IsEmpty ((⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) ↪g G) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_cliqueFree_iff, not_isEmpty_iff]
#align simple_graph.clique_free_iff SimpleGraph.cliqueFree_iff
theorem not_cliqueFree_card_of_top_embedding [Fintype α] (f : (⊤ : SimpleGraph α) ↪g G) :
¬G.CliqueFree (card α) := by
rw [not_cliqueFree_iff]
exact ⟨(Iso.completeGraph (Fintype.equivFin α)).symm.toEmbedding.trans f⟩
#align simple_graph.not_clique_free_card_of_top_embedding SimpleGraph.not_cliqueFree_card_of_top_embedding
@[simp]
theorem cliqueFree_bot (h : 2 ≤ n) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).CliqueFree n := by
intro t ht
have := le_trans h (isNClique_bot_iff.1 ht).1
contradiction
#align simple_graph.clique_free_bot SimpleGraph.cliqueFree_bot
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Clique.lean | 285 | 288 | theorem CliqueFree.mono (h : m ≤ n) : G.CliqueFree m → G.CliqueFree n := by |
intro hG s hs
obtain ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := s.exists_smaller_set _ (h.trans hs.card_eq.ge)
exact hG _ ⟨hs.clique.subset hts, ht⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.MinimalAxioms
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Algebra
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.BoundedOperation
#align_import topology.continuous_function.bounded from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5dc275ec639221ca4d5f56938eb966f6ad9bc89f"
/-!
# Bounded continuous functions
The type of bounded continuous functions taking values in a metric space, with
the uniform distance.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Bornology NNReal uniformity UniformConvergence
open Set Filter Metric Function
universe u v w
variable {F : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- `α →ᵇ β` is the type of bounded continuous functions `α → β` from a topological space to a
metric space.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α →ᵇ β)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [BoundedContinuousMapClass F α β] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `BoundedContinuousMapClass`. -/
structure BoundedContinuousFunction (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [TopologicalSpace α]
[PseudoMetricSpace β] extends ContinuousMap α β : Type max u v where
map_bounded' : ∃ C, ∀ x y, dist (toFun x) (toFun y) ≤ C
#align bounded_continuous_function BoundedContinuousFunction
scoped[BoundedContinuousFunction] infixr:25 " →ᵇ " => BoundedContinuousFunction
section
-- Porting note: Changed type of `α β` from `Type*` to `outParam Type*`.
/-- `BoundedContinuousMapClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of bounded continuous maps.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `BoundedContinuousFunction`. -/
class BoundedContinuousMapClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [TopologicalSpace α]
[PseudoMetricSpace β] [FunLike F α β] extends ContinuousMapClass F α β : Prop where
map_bounded (f : F) : ∃ C, ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C
#align bounded_continuous_map_class BoundedContinuousMapClass
end
export BoundedContinuousMapClass (map_bounded)
namespace BoundedContinuousFunction
section Basics
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [PseudoMetricSpace γ]
variable {f g : α →ᵇ β} {x : α} {C : ℝ}
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →ᵇ β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g
congr
instance instBoundedContinuousMapClass : BoundedContinuousMapClass (α →ᵇ β) α β where
map_continuous f := f.continuous_toFun
map_bounded f := f.map_bounded'
instance instCoeTC [FunLike F α β] [BoundedContinuousMapClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α →ᵇ β) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
continuous_toFun := map_continuous f
map_bounded' := map_bounded f }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_to_continuous_fun (f : α →ᵇ β) : (f.toContinuousMap : α → β) = f := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_to_continuous_fun BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_to_continuous_fun
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (h : α →ᵇ β) : α → β := h
#align bounded_continuous_function.simps.apply BoundedContinuousFunction.Simps.apply
initialize_simps_projections BoundedContinuousFunction (toContinuousMap_toFun → apply)
protected theorem bounded (f : α →ᵇ β) : ∃ C, ∀ x y : α, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
f.map_bounded'
#align bounded_continuous_function.bounded BoundedContinuousFunction.bounded
protected theorem continuous (f : α →ᵇ β) : Continuous f :=
f.toContinuousMap.continuous
#align bounded_continuous_function.continuous BoundedContinuousFunction.continuous
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align bounded_continuous_function.ext BoundedContinuousFunction.ext
theorem isBounded_range (f : α →ᵇ β) : IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_iff.2 f.bounded
#align bounded_continuous_function.bounded_range BoundedContinuousFunction.isBounded_range
theorem isBounded_image (f : α →ᵇ β) (s : Set α) : IsBounded (f '' s) :=
f.isBounded_range.subset <| image_subset_range _ _
#align bounded_continuous_function.bounded_image BoundedContinuousFunction.isBounded_image
theorem eq_of_empty [h : IsEmpty α] (f g : α →ᵇ β) : f = g :=
ext <| h.elim
#align bounded_continuous_function.eq_of_empty BoundedContinuousFunction.eq_of_empty
/-- A continuous function with an explicit bound is a bounded continuous function. -/
def mkOfBound (f : C(α, β)) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀ x y : α, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C) : α →ᵇ β :=
⟨f, ⟨C, h⟩⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_bound BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfBound
@[simp]
theorem mkOfBound_coe {f} {C} {h} : (mkOfBound f C h : α → β) = (f : α → β) := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_bound_coe BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfBound_coe
/-- A continuous function on a compact space is automatically a bounded continuous function. -/
def mkOfCompact [CompactSpace α] (f : C(α, β)) : α →ᵇ β :=
⟨f, isBounded_range_iff.1 (isCompact_range f.continuous).isBounded⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_compact BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfCompact
@[simp]
theorem mkOfCompact_apply [CompactSpace α] (f : C(α, β)) (a : α) : mkOfCompact f a = f a := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_compact_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfCompact_apply
/-- If a function is bounded on a discrete space, it is automatically continuous,
and therefore gives rise to an element of the type of bounded continuous functions. -/
@[simps]
def mkOfDiscrete [DiscreteTopology α] (f : α → β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀ x y : α, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C) :
α →ᵇ β :=
⟨⟨f, continuous_of_discreteTopology⟩, ⟨C, h⟩⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_discrete BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfDiscrete
/-- The uniform distance between two bounded continuous functions. -/
instance instDist : Dist (α →ᵇ β) :=
⟨fun f g => sInf { C | 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ C }⟩
theorem dist_eq : dist f g = sInf { C | 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ C } := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_eq BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_eq
theorem dist_set_exists : ∃ C, 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ C := by
rcases isBounded_iff.1 (f.isBounded_range.union g.isBounded_range) with ⟨C, hC⟩
refine ⟨max 0 C, le_max_left _ _, fun x => (hC ?_ ?_).trans (le_max_right _ _)⟩
<;> [left; right]
<;> apply mem_range_self
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_set_exists BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_set_exists
/-- The pointwise distance is controlled by the distance between functions, by definition. -/
theorem dist_coe_le_dist (x : α) : dist (f x) (g x) ≤ dist f g :=
le_csInf dist_set_exists fun _ hb => hb.2 x
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_coe_le_dist BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_coe_le_dist
/- This lemma will be needed in the proof of the metric space instance, but it will become
useless afterwards as it will be superseded by the general result that the distance is nonnegative
in metric spaces. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' : 0 ≤ dist f g :=
le_csInf dist_set_exists fun _ => And.left
/-- The distance between two functions is controlled by the supremum of the pointwise distances. -/
theorem dist_le (C0 : (0 : ℝ) ≤ C) : dist f g ≤ C ↔ ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ C :=
⟨fun h x => le_trans (dist_coe_le_dist x) h, fun H => csInf_le ⟨0, fun _ => And.left⟩ ⟨C0, H⟩⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_le BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_le
theorem dist_le_iff_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : dist f g ≤ C ↔ ∀ x, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ C :=
⟨fun h x => le_trans (dist_coe_le_dist x) h,
fun w => (dist_le (le_trans dist_nonneg (w (Nonempty.some ‹_›)))).mpr w⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_le_iff_of_nonempty BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_le_iff_of_nonempty
theorem dist_lt_of_nonempty_compact [Nonempty α] [CompactSpace α]
(w : ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) < C) : dist f g < C := by
have c : Continuous fun x => dist (f x) (g x) := by continuity
obtain ⟨x, -, le⟩ :=
IsCompact.exists_isMaxOn isCompact_univ Set.univ_nonempty (Continuous.continuousOn c)
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_le_iff_of_nonempty.mpr fun y => le trivial) (w x)
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_lt_of_nonempty_compact BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_lt_of_nonempty_compact
theorem dist_lt_iff_of_compact [CompactSpace α] (C0 : (0 : ℝ) < C) :
dist f g < C ↔ ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) < C := by
fconstructor
· intro w x
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_coe_le_dist x) w
· by_cases h : Nonempty α
· exact dist_lt_of_nonempty_compact
· rintro -
convert C0
apply le_antisymm _ dist_nonneg'
rw [dist_eq]
exact csInf_le ⟨0, fun C => And.left⟩ ⟨le_rfl, fun x => False.elim (h (Nonempty.intro x))⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_lt_iff_of_compact BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_lt_iff_of_compact
theorem dist_lt_iff_of_nonempty_compact [Nonempty α] [CompactSpace α] :
dist f g < C ↔ ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) < C :=
⟨fun w x => lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_coe_le_dist x) w, dist_lt_of_nonempty_compact⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_lt_iff_of_nonempty_compact BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_lt_iff_of_nonempty_compact
/-- The type of bounded continuous functions, with the uniform distance, is a pseudometric space. -/
instance instPseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace (α →ᵇ β) where
dist_self f := le_antisymm ((dist_le le_rfl).2 fun x => by simp) dist_nonneg'
dist_comm f g := by simp [dist_eq, dist_comm]
dist_triangle f g h := (dist_le (add_nonneg dist_nonneg' dist_nonneg')).2
fun x => le_trans (dist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (dist_coe_le_dist _) (dist_coe_le_dist _))
-- Porting note (#10888): added proof for `edist_dist`
edist_dist x y := by dsimp; congr; simp [dist_nonneg']
/-- The type of bounded continuous functions, with the uniform distance, is a metric space. -/
instance instMetricSpace {β} [MetricSpace β] : MetricSpace (α →ᵇ β) where
eq_of_dist_eq_zero hfg := by
ext x
exact eq_of_dist_eq_zero (le_antisymm (hfg ▸ dist_coe_le_dist _) dist_nonneg)
theorem nndist_eq : nndist f g = sInf { C | ∀ x : α, nndist (f x) (g x) ≤ C } :=
Subtype.ext <| dist_eq.trans <| by
rw [val_eq_coe, coe_sInf, coe_image]
simp_rw [mem_setOf_eq, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_mk, exists_prop, coe_nndist]
#align bounded_continuous_function.nndist_eq BoundedContinuousFunction.nndist_eq
theorem nndist_set_exists : ∃ C, ∀ x : α, nndist (f x) (g x) ≤ C :=
Subtype.exists.mpr <| dist_set_exists.imp fun _ ⟨ha, h⟩ => ⟨ha, h⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.nndist_set_exists BoundedContinuousFunction.nndist_set_exists
theorem nndist_coe_le_nndist (x : α) : nndist (f x) (g x) ≤ nndist f g :=
dist_coe_le_dist x
#align bounded_continuous_function.nndist_coe_le_nndist BoundedContinuousFunction.nndist_coe_le_nndist
/-- On an empty space, bounded continuous functions are at distance 0. -/
theorem dist_zero_of_empty [IsEmpty α] : dist f g = 0 := by
rw [(ext isEmptyElim : f = g), dist_self]
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_zero_of_empty BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_zero_of_empty
theorem dist_eq_iSup : dist f g = ⨆ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [iSup_of_empty', Real.sSup_empty, dist_zero_of_empty]
refine (dist_le_iff_of_nonempty.mpr <| le_ciSup ?_).antisymm (ciSup_le dist_coe_le_dist)
exact dist_set_exists.imp fun C hC => forall_mem_range.2 hC.2
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_eq_supr BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_eq_iSup
theorem nndist_eq_iSup : nndist f g = ⨆ x : α, nndist (f x) (g x) :=
Subtype.ext <| dist_eq_iSup.trans <| by simp_rw [val_eq_coe, coe_iSup, coe_nndist]
#align bounded_continuous_function.nndist_eq_supr BoundedContinuousFunction.nndist_eq_iSup
theorem tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly {ι : Type*} {F : ι → α →ᵇ β} {f : α →ᵇ β} {l : Filter ι} :
Tendsto F l (𝓝 f) ↔ TendstoUniformly (fun i => F i) f l :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
tendstoUniformly_iff.2 fun ε ε0 =>
(Metric.tendsto_nhds.mp h ε ε0).mp
(eventually_of_forall fun n hn x =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_coe_le_dist x) (dist_comm (F n) f ▸ hn)))
fun h =>
Metric.tendsto_nhds.mpr fun _ ε_pos =>
(h _ (dist_mem_uniformity <| half_pos ε_pos)).mp
(eventually_of_forall fun n hn =>
lt_of_le_of_lt
((dist_le (half_pos ε_pos).le).mpr fun x => dist_comm (f x) (F n x) ▸ le_of_lt (hn x))
(half_lt_self ε_pos))
#align bounded_continuous_function.tendsto_iff_tendsto_uniformly BoundedContinuousFunction.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly
/-- The topology on `α →ᵇ β` is exactly the topology induced by the natural map to `α →ᵤ β`. -/
theorem inducing_coeFn : Inducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ (⇑) : (α →ᵇ β) → α →ᵤ β) := by
rw [inducing_iff_nhds]
refine fun f => eq_of_forall_le_iff fun l => ?_
rw [← tendsto_iff_comap, ← tendsto_id', tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly,
UniformFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly]
simp [comp_def]
#align bounded_continuous_function.inducing_coe_fn BoundedContinuousFunction.inducing_coeFn
-- TODO: upgrade to a `UniformEmbedding`
theorem embedding_coeFn : Embedding (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ (⇑) : (α →ᵇ β) → α →ᵤ β) :=
⟨inducing_coeFn, fun _ _ h => ext fun x => congr_fun h x⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.embedding_coe_fn BoundedContinuousFunction.embedding_coeFn
variable (α)
/-- Constant as a continuous bounded function. -/
@[simps! (config := .asFn)] -- Porting note: Changed `simps` to `simps!`
def const (b : β) : α →ᵇ β :=
⟨ContinuousMap.const α b, 0, by simp⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.const BoundedContinuousFunction.const
variable {α}
theorem const_apply' (a : α) (b : β) : (const α b : α → β) a = b := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.const_apply' BoundedContinuousFunction.const_apply'
/-- If the target space is inhabited, so is the space of bounded continuous functions. -/
instance [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α →ᵇ β) :=
⟨const α default⟩
theorem lipschitz_evalx (x : α) : LipschitzWith 1 fun f : α →ᵇ β => f x :=
LipschitzWith.mk_one fun _ _ => dist_coe_le_dist x
#align bounded_continuous_function.lipschitz_evalx BoundedContinuousFunction.lipschitz_evalx
theorem uniformContinuous_coe : @UniformContinuous (α →ᵇ β) (α → β) _ _ (⇑) :=
uniformContinuous_pi.2 fun x => (lipschitz_evalx x).uniformContinuous
#align bounded_continuous_function.uniform_continuous_coe BoundedContinuousFunction.uniformContinuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous fun (f : α →ᵇ β) x => f x :=
UniformContinuous.continuous uniformContinuous_coe
#align bounded_continuous_function.continuous_coe BoundedContinuousFunction.continuous_coe
/-- When `x` is fixed, `(f : α →ᵇ β) ↦ f x` is continuous. -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_eval_const {x : α} : Continuous fun f : α →ᵇ β => f x :=
(continuous_apply x).comp continuous_coe
#align bounded_continuous_function.continuous_eval_const BoundedContinuousFunction.continuous_eval_const
/-- The evaluation map is continuous, as a joint function of `u` and `x`. -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_eval : Continuous fun p : (α →ᵇ β) × α => p.1 p.2 :=
(continuous_prod_of_continuous_lipschitzWith _ 1 fun f => f.continuous) <| lipschitz_evalx
#align bounded_continuous_function.continuous_eval BoundedContinuousFunction.continuous_eval
/-- Bounded continuous functions taking values in a complete space form a complete space. -/
instance instCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace β] : CompleteSpace (α →ᵇ β) :=
complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto fun (f : ℕ → α →ᵇ β) (hf : CauchySeq f) => by
/- We have to show that `f n` converges to a bounded continuous function.
For this, we prove pointwise convergence to define the limit, then check
it is a continuous bounded function, and then check the norm convergence. -/
rcases cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.1 hf with ⟨b, b0, b_bound, b_lim⟩
have f_bdd := fun x n m N hn hm => le_trans (dist_coe_le_dist x) (b_bound n m N hn hm)
have fx_cau : ∀ x, CauchySeq fun n => f n x :=
fun x => cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.2 ⟨b, b0, f_bdd x, b_lim⟩
choose F hF using fun x => cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete (fx_cau x)
/- `F : α → β`, `hF : ∀ (x : α), Tendsto (fun n ↦ ↑(f n) x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))`
`F` is the desired limit function. Check that it is uniformly approximated by `f N`. -/
have fF_bdd : ∀ x N, dist (f N x) (F x) ≤ b N :=
fun x N => le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.dist (hF x))
(Filter.eventually_atTop.2 ⟨N, fun n hn => f_bdd x N n N (le_refl N) hn⟩)
refine ⟨⟨⟨F, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· -- Check that `F` is continuous, as a uniform limit of continuous functions
have : TendstoUniformly (fun n x => f n x) F atTop := by
refine Metric.tendstoUniformly_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
refine ((tendsto_order.1 b_lim).2 ε ε0).mono fun n hn x => ?_
rw [dist_comm]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (fF_bdd x n) hn
exact this.continuous (eventually_of_forall fun N => (f N).continuous)
· -- Check that `F` is bounded
rcases (f 0).bounded with ⟨C, hC⟩
refine ⟨C + (b 0 + b 0), fun x y => ?_⟩
calc
dist (F x) (F y) ≤ dist (f 0 x) (f 0 y) + (dist (f 0 x) (F x) + dist (f 0 y) (F y)) :=
dist_triangle4_left _ _ _ _
_ ≤ C + (b 0 + b 0) := by mono
· -- Check that `F` is close to `f N` in distance terms
refine tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 (squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) ?_ b_lim)
exact fun N => (dist_le (b0 _)).2 fun x => fF_bdd x N
/-- Composition of a bounded continuous function and a continuous function. -/
def compContinuous {δ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace δ] (f : α →ᵇ β) (g : C(δ, α)) : δ →ᵇ β where
toContinuousMap := f.1.comp g
map_bounded' := f.map_bounded'.imp fun _ hC _ _ => hC _ _
#align bounded_continuous_function.comp_continuous BoundedContinuousFunction.compContinuous
@[simp]
theorem coe_compContinuous {δ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace δ] (f : α →ᵇ β) (g : C(δ, α)) :
⇑(f.compContinuous g) = f ∘ g := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_comp_continuous BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_compContinuous
@[simp]
theorem compContinuous_apply {δ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace δ] (f : α →ᵇ β) (g : C(δ, α)) (x : δ) :
f.compContinuous g x = f (g x) := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.comp_continuous_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.compContinuous_apply
theorem lipschitz_compContinuous {δ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace δ] (g : C(δ, α)) :
LipschitzWith 1 fun f : α →ᵇ β => f.compContinuous g :=
LipschitzWith.mk_one fun _ _ => (dist_le dist_nonneg).2 fun x => dist_coe_le_dist (g x)
#align bounded_continuous_function.lipschitz_comp_continuous BoundedContinuousFunction.lipschitz_compContinuous
theorem continuous_compContinuous {δ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace δ] (g : C(δ, α)) :
Continuous fun f : α →ᵇ β => f.compContinuous g :=
(lipschitz_compContinuous g).continuous
#align bounded_continuous_function.continuous_comp_continuous BoundedContinuousFunction.continuous_compContinuous
/-- Restrict a bounded continuous function to a set. -/
def restrict (f : α →ᵇ β) (s : Set α) : s →ᵇ β :=
f.compContinuous <| (ContinuousMap.id _).restrict s
#align bounded_continuous_function.restrict BoundedContinuousFunction.restrict
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrict (f : α →ᵇ β) (s : Set α) : ⇑(f.restrict s) = f ∘ (↑) := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_restrict BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_restrict
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (f : α →ᵇ β) (s : Set α) (x : s) : f.restrict s x = f x := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.restrict_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.restrict_apply
/-- Composition (in the target) of a bounded continuous function with a Lipschitz map again
gives a bounded continuous function. -/
def comp (G : β → γ) {C : ℝ≥0} (H : LipschitzWith C G) (f : α →ᵇ β) : α →ᵇ γ :=
⟨⟨fun x => G (f x), H.continuous.comp f.continuous⟩,
let ⟨D, hD⟩ := f.bounded
⟨max C 0 * D, fun x y =>
calc
dist (G (f x)) (G (f y)) ≤ C * dist (f x) (f y) := H.dist_le_mul _ _
_ ≤ max C 0 * dist (f x) (f y) := by gcongr; apply le_max_left
_ ≤ max C 0 * D := by gcongr; apply hD
⟩⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.comp BoundedContinuousFunction.comp
/-- The composition operator (in the target) with a Lipschitz map is Lipschitz. -/
theorem lipschitz_comp {G : β → γ} {C : ℝ≥0} (H : LipschitzWith C G) :
LipschitzWith C (comp G H : (α →ᵇ β) → α →ᵇ γ) :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun f g =>
(dist_le (mul_nonneg C.2 dist_nonneg)).2 fun x =>
calc
dist (G (f x)) (G (g x)) ≤ C * dist (f x) (g x) := H.dist_le_mul _ _
_ ≤ C * dist f g := by gcongr; apply dist_coe_le_dist
#align bounded_continuous_function.lipschitz_comp BoundedContinuousFunction.lipschitz_comp
/-- The composition operator (in the target) with a Lipschitz map is uniformly continuous. -/
theorem uniformContinuous_comp {G : β → γ} {C : ℝ≥0} (H : LipschitzWith C G) :
UniformContinuous (comp G H : (α →ᵇ β) → α →ᵇ γ) :=
(lipschitz_comp H).uniformContinuous
#align bounded_continuous_function.uniform_continuous_comp BoundedContinuousFunction.uniformContinuous_comp
/-- The composition operator (in the target) with a Lipschitz map is continuous. -/
theorem continuous_comp {G : β → γ} {C : ℝ≥0} (H : LipschitzWith C G) :
Continuous (comp G H : (α →ᵇ β) → α →ᵇ γ) :=
(lipschitz_comp H).continuous
#align bounded_continuous_function.continuous_comp BoundedContinuousFunction.continuous_comp
/-- Restriction (in the target) of a bounded continuous function taking values in a subset. -/
def codRestrict (s : Set β) (f : α →ᵇ β) (H : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : α →ᵇ s :=
⟨⟨s.codRestrict f H, f.continuous.subtype_mk _⟩, f.bounded⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.cod_restrict BoundedContinuousFunction.codRestrict
section Extend
variable {δ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace δ] [DiscreteTopology δ]
/-- A version of `Function.extend` for bounded continuous maps. We assume that the domain has
discrete topology, so we only need to verify boundedness. -/
nonrec def extend (f : α ↪ δ) (g : α →ᵇ β) (h : δ →ᵇ β) : δ →ᵇ β where
toFun := extend f g h
continuous_toFun := continuous_of_discreteTopology
map_bounded' := by
rw [← isBounded_range_iff, range_extend f.injective]
exact g.isBounded_range.union (h.isBounded_image _)
#align bounded_continuous_function.extend BoundedContinuousFunction.extend
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply (f : α ↪ δ) (g : α →ᵇ β) (h : δ →ᵇ β) (x : α) : extend f g h (f x) = g x :=
f.injective.extend_apply _ _ _
#align bounded_continuous_function.extend_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.extend_apply
@[simp]
nonrec theorem extend_comp (f : α ↪ δ) (g : α →ᵇ β) (h : δ →ᵇ β) : extend f g h ∘ f = g :=
extend_comp f.injective _ _
#align bounded_continuous_function.extend_comp BoundedContinuousFunction.extend_comp
nonrec theorem extend_apply' {f : α ↪ δ} {x : δ} (hx : x ∉ range f) (g : α →ᵇ β) (h : δ →ᵇ β) :
extend f g h x = h x :=
extend_apply' _ _ _ hx
#align bounded_continuous_function.extend_apply' BoundedContinuousFunction.extend_apply'
theorem extend_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (f : α ↪ δ) (g : α →ᵇ β) (h : δ →ᵇ β) : extend f g h = h :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| Function.extend_of_isEmpty f g h
#align bounded_continuous_function.extend_of_empty BoundedContinuousFunction.extend_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem dist_extend_extend (f : α ↪ δ) (g₁ g₂ : α →ᵇ β) (h₁ h₂ : δ →ᵇ β) :
dist (g₁.extend f h₁) (g₂.extend f h₂) =
max (dist g₁ g₂) (dist (h₁.restrict (range f)ᶜ) (h₂.restrict (range f)ᶜ)) := by
refine le_antisymm ((dist_le <| le_max_iff.2 <| Or.inl dist_nonneg).2 fun x => ?_) (max_le ?_ ?_)
· rcases em (∃ y, f y = x) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp only [extend_apply]
exact (dist_coe_le_dist x).trans (le_max_left _ _)
· simp only [extend_apply' hx]
lift x to ((range f)ᶜ : Set δ) using hx
calc
dist (h₁ x) (h₂ x) = dist (h₁.restrict (range f)ᶜ x) (h₂.restrict (range f)ᶜ x) := rfl
_ ≤ dist (h₁.restrict (range f)ᶜ) (h₂.restrict (range f)ᶜ) := dist_coe_le_dist x
_ ≤ _ := le_max_right _ _
· refine (dist_le dist_nonneg).2 fun x => ?_
rw [← extend_apply f g₁ h₁, ← extend_apply f g₂ h₂]
exact dist_coe_le_dist _
· refine (dist_le dist_nonneg).2 fun x => ?_
calc
dist (h₁ x) (h₂ x) = dist (extend f g₁ h₁ x) (extend f g₂ h₂ x) := by
rw [extend_apply' x.coe_prop, extend_apply' x.coe_prop]
_ ≤ _ := dist_coe_le_dist _
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_extend_extend BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_extend_extend
theorem isometry_extend (f : α ↪ δ) (h : δ →ᵇ β) : Isometry fun g : α →ᵇ β => extend f g h :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun g₁ g₂ => by simp [dist_nonneg]
#align bounded_continuous_function.isometry_extend BoundedContinuousFunction.isometry_extend
end Extend
end Basics
section ArzelaAscoli
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [CompactSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β]
variable {f g : α →ᵇ β} {x : α} {C : ℝ}
/- Arzela-Ascoli theorem asserts that, on a compact space, a set of functions sharing
a common modulus of continuity and taking values in a compact set forms a compact
subset for the topology of uniform convergence. In this section, we prove this theorem
and several useful variations around it. -/
/-- First version, with pointwise equicontinuity and range in a compact space. -/
theorem arzela_ascoli₁ [CompactSpace β] (A : Set (α →ᵇ β)) (closed : IsClosed A)
(H : Equicontinuous ((↑) : A → α → β)) : IsCompact A := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, Metric.equicontinuousAt_iff_pair] at H
refine isCompact_of_totallyBounded_isClosed ?_ closed
refine totallyBounded_of_finite_discretization fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases exists_between ε0 with ⟨ε₁, ε₁0, εε₁⟩
let ε₂ := ε₁ / 2 / 2
/- We have to find a finite discretization of `u`, i.e., finite information
that is sufficient to reconstruct `u` up to `ε`. This information will be
provided by the values of `u` on a sufficiently dense set `tα`,
slightly translated to fit in a finite `ε₂`-dense set `tβ` in the image. Such
sets exist by compactness of the source and range. Then, to check that these
data determine the function up to `ε`, one uses the control on the modulus of
continuity to extend the closeness on tα to closeness everywhere. -/
have ε₂0 : ε₂ > 0 := half_pos (half_pos ε₁0)
have : ∀ x : α, ∃ U, x ∈ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧
∀ y ∈ U, ∀ z ∈ U, ∀ {f : α →ᵇ β}, f ∈ A → dist (f y) (f z) < ε₂ := fun x =>
let ⟨U, nhdsU, hU⟩ := H x _ ε₂0
let ⟨V, VU, openV, xV⟩ := _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 nhdsU
⟨V, xV, openV, fun y hy z hz f hf => hU y (VU hy) z (VU hz) ⟨f, hf⟩⟩
choose U hU using this
/- For all `x`, the set `hU x` is an open set containing `x` on which the elements of `A`
fluctuate by at most `ε₂`.
We extract finitely many of these sets that cover the whole space, by compactness. -/
obtain ⟨tα : Set α, _, hfin, htα : univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ tα, U x⟩ :=
isCompact_univ.elim_finite_subcover_image (fun x _ => (hU x).2.1) fun x _ =>
mem_biUnion (mem_univ _) (hU x).1
rcases hfin.nonempty_fintype with ⟨_⟩
obtain ⟨tβ : Set β, _, hfin, htβ : univ ⊆ ⋃y ∈ tβ, ball y ε₂⟩ :=
@finite_cover_balls_of_compact β _ _ isCompact_univ _ ε₂0
rcases hfin.nonempty_fintype with ⟨_⟩
-- Associate to every point `y` in the space a nearby point `F y` in `tβ`
choose F hF using fun y => show ∃ z ∈ tβ, dist y z < ε₂ by simpa using htβ (mem_univ y)
-- `F : β → β`, `hF : ∀ (y : β), F y ∈ tβ ∧ dist y (F y) < ε₂`
/- Associate to every function a discrete approximation, mapping each point in `tα`
to a point in `tβ` close to its true image by the function. -/
refine ⟨tα → tβ, by infer_instance, fun f a => ⟨F (f.1 a), (hF (f.1 a)).1⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ f_eq_g
-- If two functions have the same approximation, then they are within distance `ε`
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ((dist_le <| le_of_lt ε₁0).2 fun x => ?_) εε₁
obtain ⟨x', x'tα, hx'⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 (htα (mem_univ x))
calc
dist (f x) (g x) ≤ dist (f x) (f x') + dist (g x) (g x') + dist (f x') (g x') :=
dist_triangle4_right _ _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₂ + ε₂ + ε₁ / 2 := by
refine le_of_lt (add_lt_add (add_lt_add ?_ ?_) ?_)
· exact (hU x').2.2 _ hx' _ (hU x').1 hf
· exact (hU x').2.2 _ hx' _ (hU x').1 hg
· have F_f_g : F (f x') = F (g x') :=
(congr_arg (fun f : tα → tβ => (f ⟨x', x'tα⟩ : β)) f_eq_g : _)
calc
dist (f x') (g x') ≤ dist (f x') (F (f x')) + dist (g x') (F (f x')) :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ = dist (f x') (F (f x')) + dist (g x') (F (g x')) := by rw [F_f_g]
_ < ε₂ + ε₂ := (add_lt_add (hF (f x')).2 (hF (g x')).2)
_ = ε₁ / 2 := add_halves _
_ = ε₁ := by rw [add_halves, add_halves]
#align bounded_continuous_function.arzela_ascoli₁ BoundedContinuousFunction.arzela_ascoli₁
/-- Second version, with pointwise equicontinuity and range in a compact subset. -/
theorem arzela_ascoli₂ (s : Set β) (hs : IsCompact s) (A : Set (α →ᵇ β)) (closed : IsClosed A)
(in_s : ∀ (f : α →ᵇ β) (x : α), f ∈ A → f x ∈ s) (H : Equicontinuous ((↑) : A → α → β)) :
IsCompact A := by
/- This version is deduced from the previous one by restricting to the compact type in the target,
using compactness there and then lifting everything to the original space. -/
have M : LipschitzWith 1 Subtype.val := LipschitzWith.subtype_val s
let F : (α →ᵇ s) → α →ᵇ β := comp (↑) M
refine IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset ((?_ : IsCompact (F ⁻¹' A)).image (continuous_comp M)) closed
fun f hf => ?_
· haveI : CompactSpace s := isCompact_iff_compactSpace.1 hs
refine arzela_ascoli₁ _ (continuous_iff_isClosed.1 (continuous_comp M) _ closed) ?_
rw [uniformEmbedding_subtype_val.toUniformInducing.equicontinuous_iff]
exact H.comp (A.restrictPreimage F)
· let g := codRestrict s f fun x => in_s f x hf
rw [show f = F g by ext; rfl] at hf ⊢
exact ⟨g, hf, rfl⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.arzela_ascoli₂ BoundedContinuousFunction.arzela_ascoli₂
/-- Third (main) version, with pointwise equicontinuity and range in a compact subset, but
without closedness. The closure is then compact. -/
theorem arzela_ascoli [T2Space β] (s : Set β) (hs : IsCompact s) (A : Set (α →ᵇ β))
(in_s : ∀ (f : α →ᵇ β) (x : α), f ∈ A → f x ∈ s) (H : Equicontinuous ((↑) : A → α → β)) :
IsCompact (closure A) :=
/- This version is deduced from the previous one by checking that the closure of `A`, in
addition to being closed, still satisfies the properties of compact range and equicontinuity. -/
arzela_ascoli₂ s hs (closure A) isClosed_closure
(fun _ x hf =>
(mem_of_closed' hs.isClosed).2 fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨g, gA, dist_fg⟩ := Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 hf ε ε0
⟨g x, in_s g x gA, lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_coe_le_dist _) dist_fg⟩)
(H.closure' continuous_coe)
#align bounded_continuous_function.arzela_ascoli BoundedContinuousFunction.arzela_ascoli
end ArzelaAscoli
section One
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [One β]
@[to_additive] instance instOne : One (α →ᵇ β) := ⟨const α 1⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : α →ᵇ β) : α → β) = 1 := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_one BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_one
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_zero BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mkOfCompact_one [CompactSpace α] : mkOfCompact (1 : C(α, β)) = 1 := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_compact_one BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfCompact_one
#align bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_compact_zero BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfCompact_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem forall_coe_one_iff_one (f : α →ᵇ β) : (∀ x, f x = 1) ↔ f = 1 :=
(@DFunLike.ext_iff _ _ _ _ f 1).symm
#align bounded_continuous_function.forall_coe_one_iff_one BoundedContinuousFunction.forall_coe_one_iff_one
#align bounded_continuous_function.forall_coe_zero_iff_zero BoundedContinuousFunction.forall_coe_zero_iff_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_compContinuous [TopologicalSpace γ] (f : C(γ, α)) : (1 : α →ᵇ β).compContinuous f = 1 :=
rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.one_comp_continuous BoundedContinuousFunction.one_compContinuous
#align bounded_continuous_function.zero_comp_continuous BoundedContinuousFunction.zero_compContinuous
end One
section add
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [AddMonoid β] [BoundedAdd β] [ContinuousAdd β]
variable (f g : α →ᵇ β) {x : α} {C : ℝ}
/-- The pointwise sum of two bounded continuous functions is again bounded continuous. -/
instance instAdd : Add (α →ᵇ β) where
add f g :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f x + g x
continuous_toFun := f.continuous.add g.continuous
map_bounded' := add_bounded_of_bounded_of_bounded (map_bounded f) (map_bounded g) }
@[simp]
theorem coe_add : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_add BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_add
theorem add_apply : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.add_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.add_apply
@[simp]
theorem mkOfCompact_add [CompactSpace α] (f g : C(α, β)) :
mkOfCompact (f + g) = mkOfCompact f + mkOfCompact g := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_compact_add BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfCompact_add
theorem add_compContinuous [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : C(γ, α)) :
(g + f).compContinuous h = g.compContinuous h + f.compContinuous h := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.add_comp_continuous BoundedContinuousFunction.add_compContinuous
@[simp]
theorem coe_nsmulRec : ∀ n, ⇑(nsmulRec n f) = n • ⇑f
| 0 => by rw [nsmulRec, zero_smul, coe_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [nsmulRec, succ_nsmul, coe_add, coe_nsmulRec n]
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_nsmul_rec BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_nsmulRec
instance instSMulNat : SMul ℕ (α →ᵇ β) where
smul n f :=
{ toContinuousMap := n • f.toContinuousMap
map_bounded' := by simpa [coe_nsmulRec] using (nsmulRec n f).map_bounded' }
#align bounded_continuous_function.has_nat_scalar BoundedContinuousFunction.instSMulNat
@[simp]
theorem coe_nsmul (r : ℕ) (f : α →ᵇ β) : ⇑(r • f) = r • ⇑f := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_nsmul BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_apply (r : ℕ) (f : α →ᵇ β) (v : α) : (r • f) v = r • f v := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.nsmul_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.nsmul_apply
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (α →ᵇ β) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _
/-- Coercion of a `NormedAddGroupHom` is an `AddMonoidHom`. Similar to `AddMonoidHom.coeFn`. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddHom : (α →ᵇ β) →+ α → β where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_fn_add_hom BoundedContinuousFunction.coeFnAddHom
variable (α β)
/-- The additive map forgetting that a bounded continuous function is bounded. -/
@[simps]
def toContinuousMapAddHom : (α →ᵇ β) →+ C(α, β) where
toFun := toContinuousMap
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := by
intros
ext
simp
#align bounded_continuous_function.to_continuous_map_add_hom BoundedContinuousFunction.toContinuousMapAddHom
end add
section comm_add
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β] [AddCommMonoid β] [BoundedAdd β] [ContinuousAdd β]
@[to_additive]
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (α →ᵇ β) where
add_comm f g := by ext; simp [add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α →ᵇ β) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : α → β) :=
map_sum coeFnAddHom f s
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_sum BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_sum
theorem sum_apply {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α →ᵇ β) (a : α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = ∑ i ∈ s, f i a := by simp
#align bounded_continuous_function.sum_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.sum_apply
end comm_add
section LipschitzAdd
/- In this section, if `β` is an `AddMonoid` whose addition operation is Lipschitz, then we show
that the space of bounded continuous functions from `α` to `β` inherits a topological `AddMonoid`
structure, by using pointwise operations and checking that they are compatible with the uniform
distance.
Implementation note: The material in this section could have been written for `LipschitzMul`
and transported by `@[to_additive]`. We choose not to do this because this causes a few lemma
names (for example, `coe_mul`) to conflict with later lemma names for normed rings; this is only a
trivial inconvenience, but in any case there are no obvious applications of the multiplicative
version. -/
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [AddMonoid β] [LipschitzAdd β]
variable (f g : α →ᵇ β) {x : α} {C : ℝ}
instance instLipschitzAdd : LipschitzAdd (α →ᵇ β) where
lipschitz_add :=
⟨LipschitzAdd.C β, by
have C_nonneg := (LipschitzAdd.C β).coe_nonneg
rw [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul]
rintro ⟨f₁, g₁⟩ ⟨f₂, g₂⟩
rw [dist_le (mul_nonneg C_nonneg dist_nonneg)]
intro x
refine le_trans (lipschitz_with_lipschitz_const_add ⟨f₁ x, g₁ x⟩ ⟨f₂ x, g₂ x⟩) ?_
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ C_nonneg
apply max_le_max <;> exact dist_coe_le_dist x⟩
end LipschitzAdd
section sub
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {R : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace R] [Sub R] [BoundedSub R] [ContinuousSub R]
variable (f g : α →ᵇ R)
/-- The pointwise difference of two bounded continuous functions is again bounded continuous. -/
instance instSub : Sub (α →ᵇ R) where
sub f g :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ (f x - g x),
map_bounded' := sub_bounded_of_bounded_of_bounded f.map_bounded' g.map_bounded' }
theorem sub_apply {x : α} : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.sub_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.sub_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub : ⇑(f - g) = f - g := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_sub BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_sub
end sub
section casts
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance [NatCast β] : NatCast (α →ᵇ β) := ⟨fun n ↦ BoundedContinuousFunction.const _ n⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_apply [NatCast β] (n : ℕ) (x : α) : (n : α →ᵇ β) x = n := rfl
instance [IntCast β] : IntCast (α →ᵇ β) := ⟨fun m ↦ BoundedContinuousFunction.const _ m⟩
@[simp]
theorem intCast_apply [IntCast β] (m : ℤ) (x : α) : (m : α →ᵇ β) x = m := rfl
end casts
section mul
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {R : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace R]
instance instMul [Mul R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R] :
Mul (α →ᵇ R) where
mul f g :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f x * g x
continuous_toFun := f.continuous.mul g.continuous
map_bounded' := mul_bounded_of_bounded_of_bounded (map_bounded f) (map_bounded g) }
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul [Mul R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R] (f g : α →ᵇ R) : ⇑(f * g) = f * g := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_mul BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_mul
theorem mul_apply [Mul R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R] (f g : α →ᵇ R) (x : α) :
(f * g) x = f x * g x := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.mul_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.mul_apply
instance instPow [Monoid R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R] : Pow (α →ᵇ R) ℕ where
pow f n :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ (f x) ^ n
continuous_toFun := f.continuous.pow n
map_bounded' := by
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := Metric.isBounded_iff.mp <| isBounded_pow (isBounded_range f) n
exact ⟨C, fun x y ↦ hC (by simp) (by simp)⟩ }
theorem coe_pow [Monoid R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R] (n : ℕ) (f : α →ᵇ R) :
⇑(f ^ n) = (⇑f) ^ n := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_pow BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_pow
@[simp]
theorem pow_apply [Monoid R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R] (n : ℕ) (f : α →ᵇ R) (x : α) :
(f ^ n) x = f x ^ n := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.pow_apply BoundedContinuousFunction.pow_apply
instance instMonoid [Monoid R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R] :
Monoid (α →ᵇ R) :=
Injective.monoid (↑) DFunLike.coe_injective' rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
instance instCommMonoid [CommMonoid R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R] :
CommMonoid (α →ᵇ R) where
__ := instMonoid
mul_comm f g := by ext x; simp [mul_apply, mul_comm]
instance instSemiring [Semiring R] [BoundedMul R] [ContinuousMul R]
[BoundedAdd R] [ContinuousAdd R] :
Semiring (α →ᵇ R) :=
Injective.semiring (↑) DFunLike.coe_injective'
rfl rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ ↦ rfl)
end mul
section NormedAddCommGroup
/- In this section, if `β` is a normed group, then we show that the space of bounded
continuous functions from `α` to `β` inherits a normed group structure, by using
pointwise operations and checking that they are compatible with the uniform distance. -/
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
variable (f g : α →ᵇ β) {x : α} {C : ℝ}
instance instNorm : Norm (α →ᵇ β) := ⟨(dist · 0)⟩
theorem norm_def : ‖f‖ = dist f 0 := rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.norm_def BoundedContinuousFunction.norm_def
/-- The norm of a bounded continuous function is the supremum of `‖f x‖`.
We use `sInf` to ensure that the definition works if `α` has no elements. -/
theorem norm_eq (f : α →ᵇ β) : ‖f‖ = sInf { C : ℝ | 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ x : α, ‖f x‖ ≤ C } := by
simp [norm_def, BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_eq]
#align bounded_continuous_function.norm_eq BoundedContinuousFunction.norm_eq
/-- When the domain is non-empty, we do not need the `0 ≤ C` condition in the formula for `‖f‖` as a
`sInf`. -/
theorem norm_eq_of_nonempty [h : Nonempty α] : ‖f‖ = sInf { C : ℝ | ∀ x : α, ‖f x‖ ≤ C } := by
obtain ⟨a⟩ := h
rw [norm_eq]
congr
ext
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun h' => le_trans (norm_nonneg (f a)) (h' a)
#align bounded_continuous_function.norm_eq_of_nonempty BoundedContinuousFunction.norm_eq_of_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_zero_of_empty [IsEmpty α] : ‖f‖ = 0 :=
dist_zero_of_empty
#align bounded_continuous_function.norm_eq_zero_of_empty BoundedContinuousFunction.norm_eq_zero_of_empty
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousFunction/Bounded.lean | 894 | 897 | theorem norm_coe_le_norm (x : α) : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖f x‖ = dist (f x) ((0 : α →ᵇ β) x) := by | simp [dist_zero_right]
_ ≤ ‖f‖ := dist_coe_le_dist _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_def Pi.himp_def
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_def Pi.hnot_def
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_apply Pi.himp_apply
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_apply Pi.hnot_apply
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align himp_le_himp_himp_himp himp_le_himp_himp_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_left_comm himp_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_idem himp_idem
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
#align himp_inf_distrib himp_inf_distrib
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
#align sup_himp_distrib sup_himp_distrib
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
#align himp_le_himp_left himp_le_himp_left
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
#align himp_le_himp_right himp_le_himp_right
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
#align himp_le_himp himp_le_himp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_left sup_himp_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_right sup_himp_self_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_right Codisjoint.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_left Codisjoint.himp_eq_left
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
#align le_himp_himp le_himp_himp
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
#align himp_triangle himp_triangle
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
#align himp_inf_himp_cancel himp_inf_himp_cancel
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
#align prod.generalized_heyting_algebra Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
#align pi.generalized_heyting_algebra Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
#align sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
#align sdiff_sdiff sdiff_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_left sdiff_sdiff_left
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_comm sdiff_sdiff_comm
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_idem sdiff_idem
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
#align sdiff_sdiff_self sdiff_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align sup_sdiff_distrib sup_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
#align sdiff_inf_distrib sdiff_inf_distrib
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
#align sup_sdiff sup_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sup_sdiff_right_self sup_sdiff_right_self
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
#align sup_sdiff_left_self sup_sdiff_left_self
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_right sdiff_le_sdiff_right
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_left sdiff_le_sdiff_left
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
#align sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_le_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
#align sdiff_inf sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_left sdiff_inf_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_right sdiff_inf_self_right
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_left Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_right Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
#align disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
#align disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
#align sdiff_sdiff_le sdiff_sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_triangle sdiff_triangle
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
#align sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
#align inf_sdiff_sup_left inf_sdiff_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
#align inf_sdiff_sup_right inf_sdiff_sup_right
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
#align prod.generalized_coheyting_algebra Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
#align pi.generalized_coheyting_algebra Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
#align himp_bot himp_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_himp bot_himp
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
#align compl_sup_distrib compl_sup_distrib
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
#align compl_sup compl_sup
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
#align compl_le_himp compl_le_himp
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
#align compl_sup_le_himp compl_sup_le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
#align sup_compl_le_himp sup_compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_compl himp_compl
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
#align himp_compl_comm himp_compl_comm
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
#align le_compl_iff_disjoint_right le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
#align le_compl_iff_disjoint_left le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
#align le_compl_comm le_compl_comm
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
#align disjoint.le_compl_right Disjoint.le_compl_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
#align disjoint.le_compl_left Disjoint.le_compl_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
#align le_compl_iff_le_compl le_compl_iff_le_compl
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
#align le_compl_of_le_compl le_compl_of_le_compl
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
#align disjoint_compl_left disjoint_compl_left
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
#align disjoint_compl_right disjoint_compl_right
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
#align has_le.le.disjoint_compl_left LE.le.disjoint_compl_left
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
#align has_le.le.disjoint_compl_right LE.le.disjoint_compl_right
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
#align is_compl.compl_eq IsCompl.compl_eq
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
#align is_compl.eq_compl IsCompl.eq_compl
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
#align compl_unique compl_unique
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
#align inf_compl_self inf_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
#align compl_inf_self compl_inf_self
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
#align inf_compl_eq_bot inf_compl_eq_bot
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
#align compl_inf_eq_bot compl_inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
#align compl_top compl_top
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
#align compl_bot compl_bot
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
#align le_compl_compl le_compl_compl
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
#align compl_anti compl_anti
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
#align compl_le_compl compl_le_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
#align compl_compl_compl compl_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
#align disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
#align disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff
theorem compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) <| compl_anti inf_le_right
#align compl_sup_compl_le compl_sup_compl_le
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 882 | 886 | theorem compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ := by |
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm ?_
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ← disjoint_assoc, inf_comm]
exact disjoint_compl_right
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Cauchy
/-!
## Boundedness in (pseudo)-metric spaces
This file contains one definition, and various results on boundedness in pseudo-metric spaces.
* `Metric.diam s` : The `iSup` of the distances of members of `s`.
Defined in terms of `EMetric.diam`, for better handling of the case when it should be infinite.
* `isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall`: a non-empty set is bounded if and only if
it is is included in some closed ball
* describing the cobounded filter, relating to the cocompact filter
* `IsCompact.isBounded`: compact sets are bounded
* `TotallyBounded.isBounded`: totally bounded sets are bounded
* `isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded`, the **Heine–Borel theorem**:
in a proper space, a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded.
* `cobounded_eq_cocompact`: in a proper space, cobounded and compact sets are the same
diameter of a subset, and its relation to boundedness
## Tags
metric, pseudo_metric, bounded, diameter, Heine-Borel theorem
-/
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Uniformity Topology Pointwise
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
namespace Metric
#align metric.bounded Bornology.IsBounded
section Bounded
variable {x : α} {s t : Set α} {r : ℝ}
#noalign metric.bounded_iff_is_bounded
#align metric.bounded_empty Bornology.isBounded_empty
#align metric.bounded_iff_mem_bounded Bornology.isBounded_iff_forall_mem
#align metric.bounded.mono Bornology.IsBounded.subset
/-- Closed balls are bounded -/
theorem isBounded_closedBall : IsBounded (closedBall x r) :=
isBounded_iff.2 ⟨r + r, fun y hy z hz =>
calc dist y z ≤ dist y x + dist z x := dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ r + r := add_le_add hy hz⟩
#align metric.bounded_closed_ball Metric.isBounded_closedBall
/-- Open balls are bounded -/
theorem isBounded_ball : IsBounded (ball x r) :=
isBounded_closedBall.subset ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.bounded_ball Metric.isBounded_ball
/-- Spheres are bounded -/
theorem isBounded_sphere : IsBounded (sphere x r) :=
isBounded_closedBall.subset sphere_subset_closedBall
#align metric.bounded_sphere Metric.isBounded_sphere
/-- Given a point, a bounded subset is included in some ball around this point -/
theorem isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall (c : α) : IsBounded s ↔ ∃ r, s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
⟨fun h ↦ (isBounded_iff.1 (h.insert c)).imp fun _r hr _x hx ↦ hr (.inr hx) (mem_insert _ _),
fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ isBounded_closedBall.subset hr⟩
#align metric.bounded_iff_subset_ball Metric.isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall (h : IsBounded s) (c : α) :
∃ r, s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
(isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c).1 h
#align metric.bounded.subset_ball Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_ball_lt (h : IsBounded s) (a : ℝ) (c : α) :
∃ r, a < r ∧ s ⊆ ball c r :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := h.subset_closedBall c
⟨max r a + 1, (le_max_right _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _), hr.trans <| closedBall_subset_ball <|
(le_max_left _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_ball (h : IsBounded s) (c : α) : ∃ r, s ⊆ ball c r :=
(h.subset_ball_lt 0 c).imp fun _ ↦ And.right
theorem isBounded_iff_subset_ball (c : α) : IsBounded s ↔ ∃ r, s ⊆ ball c r :=
⟨(IsBounded.subset_ball · c), fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ isBounded_ball.subset hr⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall_lt (h : IsBounded s) (a : ℝ) (c : α) :
∃ r, a < r ∧ s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
let ⟨r, har, hr⟩ := h.subset_ball_lt a c
⟨r, har, hr.trans ball_subset_closedBall⟩
#align metric.bounded.subset_ball_lt Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall_lt
theorem isBounded_closure_of_isBounded (h : IsBounded s) : IsBounded (closure s) :=
let ⟨C, h⟩ := isBounded_iff.1 h
isBounded_iff.2 ⟨C, fun _a ha _b hb => isClosed_Iic.closure_subset <|
map_mem_closure₂ continuous_dist ha hb h⟩
#align metric.bounded_closure_of_bounded Metric.isBounded_closure_of_isBounded
protected theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.closure (h : IsBounded s) : IsBounded (closure s) :=
isBounded_closure_of_isBounded h
#align metric.bounded.closure Bornology.IsBounded.closure
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_closure_iff : IsBounded (closure s) ↔ IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h => h.subset subset_closure, fun h => h.closure⟩
#align metric.bounded_closure_iff Metric.isBounded_closure_iff
#align metric.bounded_union Bornology.isBounded_union
#align metric.bounded.union Bornology.IsBounded.union
#align metric.bounded_bUnion Bornology.isBounded_biUnion
#align metric.bounded.prod Bornology.IsBounded.prod
theorem hasBasis_cobounded_compl_closedBall (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasBasis (fun _ ↦ True) (fun r ↦ (closedBall c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨compl_surjective.forall.2 fun _ ↦ (isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c).trans <| by simp⟩
theorem hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasBasis (fun _ ↦ True) (fun r ↦ (ball c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨compl_surjective.forall.2 fun _ ↦ (isBounded_iff_subset_ball c).trans <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem comap_dist_right_atTop (c : α) : comap (dist · c) atTop = cobounded α :=
(atTop_basis.comap _).eq_of_same_basis <| by
simpa only [compl_def, mem_ball, not_lt] using hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball c
@[simp]
theorem comap_dist_left_atTop (c : α) : comap (dist c) atTop = cobounded α := by
simpa only [dist_comm _ c] using comap_dist_right_atTop c
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_dist_right_atTop_iff (c : α) {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ dist (f x) c) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded α) := by
rw [← comap_dist_right_atTop c, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_dist_left_atTop_iff (c : α) {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ dist c (f x)) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded α) := by
simp only [dist_comm c, tendsto_dist_right_atTop_iff]
theorem tendsto_dist_right_cobounded_atTop (c : α) : Tendsto (dist · c) (cobounded α) atTop :=
tendsto_iff_comap.2 (comap_dist_right_atTop c).ge
theorem tendsto_dist_left_cobounded_atTop (c : α) : Tendsto (dist c) (cobounded α) atTop :=
tendsto_iff_comap.2 (comap_dist_left_atTop c).ge
/-- A totally bounded set is bounded -/
theorem _root_.TotallyBounded.isBounded {s : Set α} (h : TotallyBounded s) : IsBounded s :=
-- We cover the totally bounded set by finitely many balls of radius 1,
-- and then argue that a finite union of bounded sets is bounded
let ⟨_t, fint, subs⟩ := (totallyBounded_iff.mp h) 1 zero_lt_one
((isBounded_biUnion fint).2 fun _ _ => isBounded_ball).subset subs
#align totally_bounded.bounded TotallyBounded.isBounded
/-- A compact set is bounded -/
theorem _root_.IsCompact.isBounded {s : Set α} (h : IsCompact s) : IsBounded s :=
-- A compact set is totally bounded, thus bounded
h.totallyBounded.isBounded
#align is_compact.bounded IsCompact.isBounded
#align metric.bounded_of_finite Set.Finite.isBounded
#align set.finite.bounded Set.Finite.isBounded
#align metric.bounded_singleton Bornology.isBounded_singleton
theorem cobounded_le_cocompact : cobounded α ≤ cocompact α :=
hasBasis_cocompact.ge_iff.2 fun _s hs ↦ hs.isBounded
#align comap_dist_right_at_top_le_cocompact Metric.cobounded_le_cocompactₓ
#align comap_dist_left_at_top_le_cocompact Metric.cobounded_le_cocompactₓ
theorem isCobounded_iff_closedBall_compl_subset {s : Set α} (c : α) :
IsCobounded s ↔ ∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s := by
rw [← isBounded_compl_iff, isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c]
apply exists_congr
intro r
rw [compl_subset_comm]
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsCobounded.closedBall_compl_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsCobounded s)
(c : α) : ∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
(isCobounded_iff_closedBall_compl_subset c).mp hs
theorem closedBall_compl_subset_of_mem_cocompact {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ cocompact α) (c : α) :
∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
IsCobounded.closedBall_compl_subset (cobounded_le_cocompact hs) c
theorem mem_cocompact_of_closedBall_compl_subset [ProperSpace α] (c : α)
(h : ∃ r, (closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s) : s ∈ cocompact α := by
rcases h with ⟨r, h⟩
rw [Filter.mem_cocompact]
exact ⟨closedBall c r, isCompact_closedBall c r, h⟩
theorem mem_cocompact_iff_closedBall_compl_subset [ProperSpace α] (c : α) :
s ∈ cocompact α ↔ ∃ r, (closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
⟨(closedBall_compl_subset_of_mem_cocompact · _), mem_cocompact_of_closedBall_compl_subset _⟩
/-- Characterization of the boundedness of the range of a function -/
theorem isBounded_range_iff {f : β → α} : IsBounded (range f) ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans <| by simp only [forall_mem_range]
#align metric.bounded_range_iff Metric.isBounded_range_iff
theorem isBounded_image_iff {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
IsBounded (f '' s) ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans <| by simp only [forall_mem_image]
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity {f : β → α}
(hf : Tendsto (Prod.map f f) (.cofinite ×ˢ .cofinite) (𝓤 α)) : IsBounded (range f) := by
rcases (hasBasis_cofinite.prod_self.tendsto_iff uniformity_basis_dist).1 hf 1 zero_lt_one with
⟨s, hsf, hs1⟩
rw [← image_union_image_compl_eq_range]
refine (hsf.image f).isBounded.union (isBounded_image_iff.2 ⟨1, fun x hx y hy ↦ ?_⟩)
exact le_of_lt (hs1 (x, y) ⟨hx, hy⟩)
#align metric.bounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity Metric.isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity
theorem isBounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite {f : β → α} (hf : Cauchy (map f cofinite)) :
IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity <| (cauchy_map_iff.1 hf).2
#align metric.bounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite Metric.isBounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite
theorem _root_.CauchySeq.isBounded_range {f : ℕ → α} (hf : CauchySeq f) : IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite <| by rwa [Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
#align cauchy_seq.bounded_range CauchySeq.isBounded_range
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 a)) :
IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity <|
(hf.prod_map hf).mono_right <| nhds_prod_eq.symm.trans_le (nhds_le_uniformity a)
#align metric.bounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite Metric.isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite
/-- In a compact space, all sets are bounded -/
theorem isBounded_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace α] : IsBounded s :=
isCompact_univ.isBounded.subset (subset_univ _)
#align metric.bounded_of_compact_space Metric.isBounded_of_compactSpace
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto (u : ℕ → α) {x : α} (hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
IsBounded (range u) :=
hu.cauchySeq.isBounded_range
#align metric.bounded_range_of_tendsto Metric.isBounded_range_of_tendsto
theorem disjoint_nhds_cobounded (x : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (cobounded α) :=
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_right (ball_mem_nhds _ one_pos) isBounded_ball
theorem disjoint_cobounded_nhds (x : α) : Disjoint (cobounded α) (𝓝 x) :=
(disjoint_nhds_cobounded x).symm
theorem disjoint_nhdsSet_cobounded {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (cobounded α) :=
hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left.2 fun _ _ ↦ disjoint_nhds_cobounded _
theorem disjoint_cobounded_nhdsSet {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) : Disjoint (cobounded α) (𝓝ˢ s) :=
(disjoint_nhdsSet_cobounded hs).symm
theorem exists_isBounded_image_of_tendsto {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β]
{l : Filter α} {f : α → β} {x : β} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) :
∃ s ∈ l, IsBounded (f '' s) :=
(l.basis_sets.map f).disjoint_iff_left.mp <| (disjoint_nhds_cobounded x).mono_left hf
/-- If a function is continuous within a set `s` at every point of a compact set `k`, then it is
bounded on some open neighborhood of `k` in `s`. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt
[TopologicalSpace β] {k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ k, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' (t ∩ s)) := by
have : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ k ⊓ 𝓟 s) (comap f (cobounded α)) := by
rw [disjoint_assoc, inf_comm, hk.disjoint_nhdsSet_left]
exact fun x hx ↦ disjoint_left_comm.2 <|
tendsto_comap.disjoint (disjoint_cobounded_nhds _) (hf x hx)
rcases ((((hasBasis_nhdsSet _).inf_principal _)).disjoint_iff ((basis_sets _).comap _)).1 this
with ⟨U, ⟨hUo, hkU⟩, t, ht, hd⟩
refine ⟨U, hkU, hUo, (isBounded_compl_iff.2 ht).subset ?_⟩
rwa [image_subset_iff, preimage_compl, subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
#align metric.exists_is_open_bounded_image_inter_of_is_compact_of_forall_continuous_within_at Metric.exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt
/-- If a function is continuous at every point of a compact set `k`, then it is bounded on
some open neighborhood of `k`. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousAt [TopologicalSpace β]
{k : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hf : ∀ x ∈ k, ContinuousAt f x) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ] at hf
simpa only [inter_univ] using
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt hk hf
#align metric.exists_is_open_bounded_image_of_is_compact_of_forall_continuous_at Metric.exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousAt
/-- If a function is continuous on a set `s` containing a compact set `k`, then it is bounded on
some open neighborhood of `k` in `s`. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn [TopologicalSpace β]
{k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hks : k ⊆ s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt hk fun x hx =>
hf x (hks hx)
#align metric.exists_is_open_bounded_image_inter_of_is_compact_of_continuous_on Metric.exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn
/-- If a function is continuous on a neighborhood of a compact set `k`, then it is bounded on
some open neighborhood of `k`. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn [TopologicalSpace β]
{k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hs : IsOpen s) (hks : k ⊆ s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' t) :=
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousAt hk fun _x hx =>
hf.continuousAt (hs.mem_nhds (hks hx))
#align metric.exists_is_open_bounded_image_of_is_compact_of_continuous_on Metric.exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn
/-- The **Heine–Borel theorem**: In a proper space, a closed bounded set is compact. -/
theorem isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded [ProperSpace α] (hc : IsClosed s) (hb : IsBounded s) :
IsCompact s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, -⟩)
· exact isCompact_empty
· rcases hb.subset_closedBall x with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact (isCompact_closedBall x r).of_isClosed_subset hc hr
#align metric.is_compact_of_is_closed_bounded Metric.isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded
/-- The **Heine–Borel theorem**: In a proper space, the closure of a bounded set is compact. -/
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.isCompact_closure [ProperSpace α] (h : IsBounded s) :
IsCompact (closure s) :=
isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded isClosed_closure h.closure
#align metric.bounded.is_compact_closure Bornology.IsBounded.isCompact_closure
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: assume `[MetricSpace α]`
-- instead of `[PseudoMetricSpace α] [T2Space α]`
/-- The **Heine–Borel theorem**:
In a proper Hausdorff space, a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded [T2Space α] [ProperSpace α] :
IsCompact s ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.isClosed, h.isBounded⟩, fun h => isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded h.1 h.2⟩
#align metric.is_compact_iff_is_closed_bounded Metric.isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded
theorem compactSpace_iff_isBounded_univ [ProperSpace α] :
CompactSpace α ↔ IsBounded (univ : Set α) :=
⟨@isBounded_of_compactSpace α _ _, fun hb => ⟨isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded isClosed_univ hb⟩⟩
#align metric.compact_space_iff_bounded_univ Metric.compactSpace_iff_isBounded_univ
section CompactIccSpace
variable [Preorder α] [CompactIccSpace α]
theorem _root_.totallyBounded_Icc (a b : α) : TotallyBounded (Icc a b) :=
isCompact_Icc.totallyBounded
#align totally_bounded_Icc totallyBounded_Icc
theorem _root_.totallyBounded_Ico (a b : α) : TotallyBounded (Ico a b) :=
totallyBounded_subset Ico_subset_Icc_self (totallyBounded_Icc a b)
#align totally_bounded_Ico totallyBounded_Ico
theorem _root_.totallyBounded_Ioc (a b : α) : TotallyBounded (Ioc a b) :=
totallyBounded_subset Ioc_subset_Icc_self (totallyBounded_Icc a b)
#align totally_bounded_Ioc totallyBounded_Ioc
theorem _root_.totallyBounded_Ioo (a b : α) : TotallyBounded (Ioo a b) :=
totallyBounded_subset Ioo_subset_Icc_self (totallyBounded_Icc a b)
#align totally_bounded_Ioo totallyBounded_Ioo
theorem isBounded_Icc (a b : α) : IsBounded (Icc a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Icc a b).isBounded
#align metric.bounded_Icc Metric.isBounded_Icc
theorem isBounded_Ico (a b : α) : IsBounded (Ico a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Ico a b).isBounded
#align metric.bounded_Ico Metric.isBounded_Ico
theorem isBounded_Ioc (a b : α) : IsBounded (Ioc a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Ioc a b).isBounded
#align metric.bounded_Ioc Metric.isBounded_Ioc
theorem isBounded_Ioo (a b : α) : IsBounded (Ioo a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Ioo a b).isBounded
#align metric.bounded_Ioo Metric.isBounded_Ioo
/-- In a pseudo metric space with a conditionally complete linear order such that the order and the
metric structure give the same topology, any order-bounded set is metric-bounded. -/
theorem isBounded_of_bddAbove_of_bddBelow {s : Set α} (h₁ : BddAbove s) (h₂ : BddBelow s) :
IsBounded s :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h₁
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := h₂
(isBounded_Icc l u).subset (fun _x hx => mem_Icc.mpr ⟨hl hx, hu hx⟩)
#align metric.bounded_of_bdd_above_of_bdd_below Metric.isBounded_of_bddAbove_of_bddBelow
end CompactIccSpace
end Bounded
section Diam
variable {s : Set α} {x y z : α}
/-- The diameter of a set in a metric space. To get controllable behavior even when the diameter
should be infinite, we express it in terms of the `EMetric.diam` -/
noncomputable def diam (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (EMetric.diam s)
#align metric.diam Metric.diam
/-- The diameter of a set is always nonnegative -/
theorem diam_nonneg : 0 ≤ diam s :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align metric.diam_nonneg Metric.diam_nonneg
theorem diam_subsingleton (hs : s.Subsingleton) : diam s = 0 := by
simp only [diam, EMetric.diam_subsingleton hs, ENNReal.zero_toReal]
#align metric.diam_subsingleton Metric.diam_subsingleton
/-- The empty set has zero diameter -/
@[simp]
theorem diam_empty : diam (∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_subsingleton subsingleton_empty
#align metric.diam_empty Metric.diam_empty
/-- A singleton has zero diameter -/
@[simp]
theorem diam_singleton : diam ({x} : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_subsingleton subsingleton_singleton
#align metric.diam_singleton Metric.diam_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem diam_one [One α] : diam (1 : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_singleton
#align metric.diam_one Metric.diam_one
#align metric.diam_zero Metric.diam_zero
-- Does not work as a simp-lemma, since {x, y} reduces to (insert y {x})
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Bounded.lean | 420 | 421 | theorem diam_pair : diam ({x, y} : Set α) = dist x y := by |
simp only [diam, EMetric.diam_pair, dist_edist]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
#align_import order.liminf_limsup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ffde2d8a6e689149e44fd95fa862c23a57f8c780"
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section Relation
/-- `f.IsBounded (≺)`: the filter `f` is eventually bounded w.r.t. the relation `≺`, i.e.
eventually, it is bounded by some uniform bound.
`r` will be usually instantiated with `≤` or `≥`. -/
def IsBounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ᶠ x in f, r x b
#align filter.is_bounded Filter.IsBounded
/-- `f.IsBoundedUnder (≺) u`: the image of the filter `f` under `u` is eventually bounded w.r.t.
the relation `≺`, i.e. eventually, it is bounded by some uniform bound. -/
def IsBoundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsBounded r
#align filter.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBoundedUnder
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {f g : Filter α}
/-- `f` is eventually bounded if and only if, there exists an admissible set on which it is
bounded. -/
theorem isBounded_iff : f.IsBounded r ↔ ∃ s ∈ f.sets, ∃ b, s ⊆ { x | r x b } :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨{ a | r a b }, hb, b, Subset.refl _⟩) fun ⟨_, hs, b, hb⟩ =>
⟨b, mem_of_superset hs hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_iff Filter.isBounded_iff
/-- A bounded function `u` is in particular eventually bounded. -/
theorem isBoundedUnder_of {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (∃ b, ∀ x, r (u x) b) → f.IsBoundedUnder r u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, r (u x) b from eventually_of_forall hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_of Filter.isBoundedUnder_of
theorem isBounded_bot : IsBounded r ⊥ ↔ Nonempty α := by simp [IsBounded, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_bounded_bot Filter.isBounded_bot
theorem isBounded_top : IsBounded r ⊤ ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x, r x t := by simp [IsBounded, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.is_bounded_top Filter.isBounded_top
theorem isBounded_principal (s : Set α) : IsBounded r (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x ∈ s, r x t := by
simp [IsBounded, subset_def]
#align filter.is_bounded_principal Filter.isBounded_principal
theorem isBounded_sup [IsTrans α r] [IsDirected α r] :
IsBounded r f → IsBounded r g → IsBounded r (f ⊔ g)
| ⟨b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨b₂, h₂⟩ =>
let ⟨b, rb₁b, rb₂b⟩ := directed_of r b₁ b₂
⟨b, eventually_sup.mpr
⟨h₁.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₁b, h₂.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₂b⟩⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_sup Filter.isBounded_sup
theorem IsBounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : IsBounded r g → IsBounded r f
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, h hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.mono Filter.IsBounded.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono {f g : Filter β} {u : β → α} (h : f ≤ g) :
g.IsBoundedUnder r u → f.IsBoundedUnder r u := fun hg => IsBounded.mono (map_mono h) hg
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_le [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u) (hv : v ≤ᶠ[l] u) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l v := by
apply hu.imp
exact fun b hb => (eventually_map.1 hb).mp <| hv.mono fun x => le_trans
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_le Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u) (hv : u ≤ᶠ[l] v) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l v :=
IsBoundedUnder.mono_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu hv
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_ge Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge
theorem isBoundedUnder_const [IsRefl α r] {l : Filter β} {a : α} : IsBoundedUnder r l fun _ => a :=
⟨a, eventually_map.2 <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => refl _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_const Filter.isBoundedUnder_const
theorem IsBounded.isBoundedUnder {q : β → β → Prop} {u : α → β}
(hu : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (u a₀) (u a₁)) : f.IsBounded r → f.IsBoundedUnder q u
| ⟨b, h⟩ => ⟨u b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, q (u x) (u b) from h.mono fun x => hu x b⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBounded.isBoundedUnder
theorem IsBoundedUnder.comp {l : Filter γ} {q : β → β → Prop} {u : γ → α} {v : α → β}
(hv : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (v a₀) (v a₁)) : l.IsBoundedUnder r u → l.IsBoundedUnder q (v ∘ u)
| ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨v a, show ∀ᶠ x in map u l, q (v x) (v a) from h.mono fun x => hv x a⟩
/-- A bounded above function `u` is in particular eventually bounded above. -/
lemma _root_.BddAbove.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddAbove (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_upperBounds] using hb⟩
/-- A bounded below function `u` is in particular eventually bounded below. -/
lemma _root_.BddBelow.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddBelow (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_lowerBounds] using hb⟩
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f := by
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
rw [eventually_map] at hb
obtain ⟨b', h⟩ := exists_gt b
have hb' := (tendsto_atTop.mp hf) b'
have : { x : α | f x ≤ b } ∩ { x : α | b' ≤ f x } = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x hx => (not_le_of_lt h) (le_trans hx.2 hx.1)
exact (nonempty_of_mem (hb.and hb')).ne_empty this
#align filter.not_is_bounded_under_of_tendsto_at_top Filter.not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop
theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atBot [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.not_is_bounded_under_of_tendsto_at_bot Filter.not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atBot
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) cofinite f) : BddAbove (range f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨b, hb⟩
haveI : Nonempty β := ⟨b⟩
rw [← image_univ, ← union_compl_self { x | f x ≤ b }, image_union, bddAbove_union]
exact ⟨⟨b, forall_mem_image.2 fun x => id⟩, (hb.image f).bddAbove⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_above_range_of_cofinite Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range_of_cofinite [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) cofinite f) : BddBelow (range f) :=
IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_below_range_of_cofinite Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range_of_cofinite
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] {f : ℕ → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) atTop f) : BddAbove (range f) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop] at hf
exact hf.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_above_range Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] {f : ℕ → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) atTop f) : BddBelow (range f) :=
IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_below_range Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range
/-- `IsCobounded (≺) f` states that the filter `f` does not tend to infinity w.r.t. `≺`. This is
also called frequently bounded. Will be usually instantiated with `≤` or `≥`.
There is a subtlety in this definition: we want `f.IsCobounded` to hold for any `f` in the case of
complete lattices. This will be relevant to deduce theorems on complete lattices from their
versions on conditionally complete lattices with additional assumptions. We have to be careful in
the edge case of the trivial filter containing the empty set: the other natural definition
`¬ ∀ a, ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n`
would not work as well in this case.
-/
def IsCobounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ a, (∀ᶠ x in f, r x a) → r b a
#align filter.is_cobounded Filter.IsCobounded
/-- `IsCoboundedUnder (≺) f u` states that the image of the filter `f` under the map `u` does not
tend to infinity w.r.t. `≺`. This is also called frequently bounded. Will be usually instantiated
with `≤` or `≥`. -/
def IsCoboundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsCobounded r
#align filter.is_cobounded_under Filter.IsCoboundedUnder
/-- To check that a filter is frequently bounded, it suffices to have a witness
which bounds `f` at some point for every admissible set.
This is only an implication, as the other direction is wrong for the trivial filter. -/
theorem IsCobounded.mk [IsTrans α r] (a : α) (h : ∀ s ∈ f, ∃ x ∈ s, r a x) : f.IsCobounded r :=
⟨a, fun _ s =>
let ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ s
_root_.trans h₂ h₁⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded.mk Filter.IsCobounded.mk
/-- A filter which is eventually bounded is in particular frequently bounded (in the opposite
direction). At least if the filter is not trivial. -/
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_flip [IsTrans α r] [NeBot f] : f.IsBounded r → f.IsCobounded (flip r)
| ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
⟨a, fun b hb =>
let ⟨_, rxa, rbx⟩ := (ha.and hb).exists
show r b a from _root_.trans rbx rxa⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_flip Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_flip
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_ge [Preorder α] [NeBot f] (h : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·)) :
f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) :=
h.isCobounded_flip
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_ge Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_ge
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_le [Preorder α] [NeBot f] (h : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·)) :
f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) :=
h.isCobounded_flip
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_le Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_flip {l : Filter γ} [IsTrans α r] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder r u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (flip r) u :=
h.isCobounded_flip
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_le {u : γ → α} {l : Filter γ} [Preorder α] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u :=
h.isCoboundedUnder_flip
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_ge {u : γ → α} {l : Filter γ} [Preorder α] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
h.isCoboundedUnder_flip
lemma isCoboundedUnder_le_of_eventually_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in l, x ≤ f i) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_le ⟨x, hf⟩
lemma isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_eventually_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ≤ x) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_ge ⟨x, hf⟩
lemma isCoboundedUnder_le_of_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ i, x ≤ f i) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
isCoboundedUnder_le_of_eventually_le l (eventually_of_forall hf)
lemma isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ x) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_eventually_le l (eventually_of_forall hf)
theorem isCobounded_bot : IsCobounded r ⊥ ↔ ∃ b, ∀ x, r b x := by simp [IsCobounded]
#align filter.is_cobounded_bot Filter.isCobounded_bot
theorem isCobounded_top : IsCobounded r ⊤ ↔ Nonempty α := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [IsCobounded, eq_univ_iff_forall,
exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_cobounded_top Filter.isCobounded_top
theorem isCobounded_principal (s : Set α) :
(𝓟 s).IsCobounded r ↔ ∃ b, ∀ a, (∀ x ∈ s, r x a) → r b a := by simp [IsCobounded, subset_def]
#align filter.is_cobounded_principal Filter.isCobounded_principal
theorem IsCobounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : f.IsCobounded r → g.IsCobounded r
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, fun a ha => hb a (h ha)⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded.mono Filter.IsCobounded.mono
end Relation
section Nonempty
variable [Preorder α] [Nonempty α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
theorem isBounded_le_atBot : (atBot : Filter α).IsBounded (· ≤ ·) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨a, eventually_le_atBot _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_le_at_bot Filter.isBounded_le_atBot
theorem isBounded_ge_atTop : (atTop : Filter α).IsBounded (· ≥ ·) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨a, eventually_ge_atTop _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_ge_at_top Filter.isBounded_ge_atTop
theorem Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot (h : Tendsto u f atBot) : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u :=
isBounded_le_atBot.mono h
#align filter.tendsto.is_bounded_under_le_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot
theorem Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop (h : Tendsto u f atTop) : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
isBounded_ge_atTop.mono h
#align filter.tendsto.is_bounded_under_ge_at_top Filter.Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop
theorem bddAbove_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atBot [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {u : ℕ → α}
(hx : Tendsto u atTop atBot) : BddAbove (Set.range u) :=
hx.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot.bddAbove_range
#align filter.bdd_above_range_of_tendsto_at_top_at_bot Filter.bddAbove_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atBot
theorem bddBelow_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {u : ℕ → α}
(hx : Tendsto u atTop atTop) : BddBelow (Set.range u) :=
hx.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop.bddBelow_range
#align filter.bdd_below_range_of_tendsto_at_top_at_top Filter.bddBelow_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop
end Nonempty
theorem isCobounded_le_of_bot [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨⊥, fun _ _ => bot_le⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded_le_of_bot Filter.isCobounded_le_of_bot
theorem isCobounded_ge_of_top [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) :=
⟨⊤, fun _ _ => le_top⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded_ge_of_top Filter.isCobounded_ge_of_top
theorem isBounded_le_of_top [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨⊤, eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_top⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_le_of_top Filter.isBounded_le_of_top
theorem isBounded_ge_of_bot [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) :=
⟨⊥, eventually_of_forall fun _ => bot_le⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_ge_of_bot Filter.isBounded_ge_of_bot
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (e : α ≃o β) {l : Filter γ}
{u : γ → α} : (IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => e (u x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u :=
(Function.Surjective.exists e.surjective).trans <|
exists_congr fun a => by simp only [eventually_map, e.le_iff_le]
#align order_iso.is_bounded_under_le_comp OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (e : α ≃o β) {l : Filter γ}
{u : γ → α} : (IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => e (u x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u :=
OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp e.dual
#align order_iso.is_bounded_under_ge_comp OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_inv [OrderedCommGroup α] {l : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => (u x)⁻¹) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u :=
(OrderIso.inv α).isBoundedUnder_ge_comp
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_inv Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_inv
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_neg Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_inv [OrderedCommGroup α] {l : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => (u x)⁻¹) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u :=
(OrderIso.inv α).isBoundedUnder_le_comp
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_inv Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_inv
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_neg Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_neg
theorem IsBoundedUnder.sup [SemilatticeSup α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u →
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => u a ⊔ v a
| ⟨bu, (hu : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ bu)⟩, ⟨bv, (hv : ∀ᶠ x in f, v x ≤ bv)⟩ =>
⟨bu ⊔ bv, show ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ⊔ v x ≤ bu ⊔ bv
by filter_upwards [hu, hv] with _ using sup_le_sup⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under.sup Filter.IsBoundedUnder.sup
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_sup [SemilatticeSup α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => u a ⊔ v a) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono_le <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_sup_left,
h.mono_le <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_sup_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_sup Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_sup
theorem IsBoundedUnder.inf [SemilatticeInf α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u →
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun a => u a ⊓ v a :=
IsBoundedUnder.sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.is_bounded_under.inf Filter.IsBoundedUnder.inf
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_inf [SemilatticeInf α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun a => u a ⊓ v a) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v :=
isBoundedUnder_le_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_inf Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_inf
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_abs [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => |u a|) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
isBoundedUnder_le_sup.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl isBoundedUnder_le_neg
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_abs Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_abs
/-- Filters are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `isBoundedDefault` in the statements,
in the form `(hf : f.IsBounded (≥) := by isBoundedDefault)`. -/
macro "isBoundedDefault" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| apply isCobounded_le_of_bot
| apply isCobounded_ge_of_top
| apply isBounded_le_of_top
| apply isBounded_ge_of_bot)
-- Porting note: The above is a lean 4 reconstruction of (note that applyc is not available (yet?)):
-- unsafe def is_bounded_default : tactic Unit :=
-- tactic.applyc `` is_cobounded_le_of_bot <|>
-- tactic.applyc `` is_cobounded_ge_of_top <|>
-- tactic.applyc `` is_bounded_le_of_top <|> tactic.applyc `` is_bounded_ge_of_bot
-- #align filter.is_bounded_default filter.IsBounded_default
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α]
-- Porting note: Renamed from Limsup and Liminf to limsSup and limsInf
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup Filter.limsSup
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf Filter.limsInf
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
#align filter.limsup Filter.limsup
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
#align filter.liminf Filter.liminf
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
#align filter.blimsup Filter.blimsup
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
#align filter.bliminf Filter.bliminf
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
#align filter.limsup_eq Filter.limsup_eq
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
#align filter.liminf_eq Filter.liminf_eq
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
#align filter.blimsup_eq Filter.blimsup_eq
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
#align filter.bliminf_eq Filter.bliminf_eq
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
#align filter.blimsup_true Filter.blimsup_true
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
#align filter.bliminf_true Filter.bliminf_true
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype Filter.blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype Filter.bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_of_le
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.le_Liminf_of_le Filter.le_limsInf_of_le
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
#align filter.limsup_le_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_of_le
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
#align filter.le_liminf_of_le Filter.le_liminf_of_le
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.le_Limsup_of_le Filter.le_limsSup_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_of_le Filter.limsInf_le_of_le
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
#align filter.le_limsup_of_le Filter.le_limsup_of_le
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
#align filter.liminf_le_of_le Filter.liminf_le_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault):
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Limsup Filter.limsInf_le_limsSup
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault):
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
#align filter.liminf_le_limsup Filter.liminf_le_limsup
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_Limsup Filter.limsSup_le_limsSup
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Liminf Filter.limsInf_le_limsInf
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
#align filter.limsup_le_limsup Filter.limsup_le_limsup
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
#align filter.liminf_le_liminf Filter.liminf_le_liminf
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_Limsup_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Liminf_of_le Filter.limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
#align filter.limsup_le_limsup_of_le Filter.limsup_le_limsup_of_le
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
#align filter.liminf_le_liminf_of_le Filter.liminf_le_liminf_of_le
theorem limsSup_principal {s : Set α} (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upper_bounds_eq_csSup h hs
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_principal Filter.limsSup_principal
theorem limsInf_principal {s : Set α} (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_principal Filter.limsInf_principal
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
#align filter.limsup_congr Filter.limsup_congr
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
#align filter.blimsup_congr Filter.blimsup_congr
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.bliminf_congr Filter.bliminf_congr
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.liminf_congr Filter.liminf_congr
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
#align filter.limsup_const Filter.limsup_const
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
#align filter.liminf_const Filter.liminf_const
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
-- Porting note: simp_nf linter incorrectly says: lhs does not simplify when using simp on itself.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
change liminf (f ∘ (· + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop
rw [liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
#align filter.liminf_nat_add Filter.liminf_nat_add
-- Porting note: simp_nf linter incorrectly says: lhs does not simplify when using simp on itself.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
#align filter.limsup_nat_add Filter.limsup_nat_add
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_bot Filter.limsSup_bot
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_bot Filter.limsInf_bot
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simp [eq_univ_iff_forall]; exact fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_top Filter.limsSup_top
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simp [eq_univ_iff_forall]; exact fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_top Filter.limsInf_top
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
#align filter.blimsup_false Filter.blimsup_false
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
#align filter.bliminf_false Filter.bliminf_false
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
#align filter.limsup_const_bot Filter.limsup_const_bot
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.liminf_const_top Filter.liminf_const_top
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.has_basis.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup Filter.HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.has_basis.Liminf_eq_supr_Inf Filter.HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup Filter.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_eq_supr_Inf Filter.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (eventually_of_forall (le_iSup u))
#align filter.limsup_le_supr Filter.limsup_le_iSup
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (eventually_of_forall (iInf_le u))
#align filter.infi_le_liminf Filter.iInf_le_liminf
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat' Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat'
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
#align filter.has_basis.limsup_eq_infi_supr Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
#align filter.blimsup_congr' Filter.blimsup_congr'
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.bliminf_congr' Filter.bliminf_congr'
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_infi_bsupr Filter.blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_infi_bsupr_of_nat Filter.blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi_of_nat Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi_of_nat' Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat'
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.has_basis.liminf_eq_supr_infi Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
#align filter.bliminf_eq_supr_binfi Filter.bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
#align filter.bliminf_eq_supr_binfi_of_nat Filter.bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat
theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.limsup_eq_Inf_Sup Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup
theorem liminf_eq_sSup_sInf {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
liminf a F = sSup ((fun I => sInf (a '' I)) '' F.sets) :=
@Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup ι (OrderDual R) _ _ a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.liminf_eq_Sup_Inf Filter.liminf_eq_sSup_sInf
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ x) : liminf u f ≤ x := by
rw [liminf_eq]
refine sSup_le fun b hb => ?_
have hbx : ∃ᶠ _ in f, b ≤ x := by
revert h
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently, not_frequently]
exact fun h => hb.mp (h.mono fun a hbx hba hax => hbx (hba.trans hax))
exact hbx.exists.choose_spec
#align filter.liminf_le_of_frequently_le' Filter.liminf_le_of_frequently_le'
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, x ≤ u a) : x ≤ limsup u f :=
liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (β := βᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.le_limsup_of_frequently_le' Filter.le_limsup_of_frequently_le'
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the limsup of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
@[simp]
theorem CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop := by
rw [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', map_iInf]
simp_rw [_root_.map_iSup, ← Function.comp_apply (f := f), ← Function.iterate_succ' f,
← Nat.add_succ]
conv_rhs => rw [iInf_split _ (0 < ·)]
simp only [not_lt, Nat.le_zero, iInf_iInf_eq_left, add_zero, iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq, left_eq_inf]
refine (iInf_le (fun i => ⨆ j, f^[j + (i + 1)] a) 0).trans ?_
simp only [zero_add, Function.comp_apply, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun i => le_iSup (fun i => f^[i] a) (i + 1)
#align filter.complete_lattice_hom.apply_limsup_iterate Filter.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the liminf of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
theorem CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop :=
apply_limsup_iterate (CompleteLatticeHom.dual f) _
#align filter.complete_lattice_hom.apply_liminf_iterate Filter.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate
variable {f g : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u v : β → α}
theorem blimsup_mono (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f q :=
sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
#align filter.blimsup_mono Filter.blimsup_mono
theorem bliminf_antitone (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
#align filter.bliminf_antitone Filter.bliminf_antitone
theorem mono_blimsup' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.2 hx').trans (hx.1 hx')
#align filter.mono_blimsup' Filter.mono_blimsup'
theorem mono_blimsup (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
mono_blimsup' <| eventually_of_forall h
#align filter.mono_blimsup Filter.mono_blimsup
theorem mono_bliminf' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.1 hx').trans (hx.2 hx')
#align filter.mono_bliminf' Filter.mono_bliminf'
theorem mono_bliminf (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
mono_bliminf' <| eventually_of_forall h
#align filter.mono_bliminf Filter.mono_bliminf
theorem bliminf_antitone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : bliminf u g p ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
#align filter.bliminf_antitone_filter Filter.bliminf_antitone_filter
theorem blimsup_monotone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u g p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
#align filter.blimsup_monotone_filter Filter.blimsup_monotone_filter
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp_nf linter, lhs simplifies, added _aux versions below
theorem blimsup_and_le_inf : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p ⊓ blimsup u f q :=
le_inf (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
#align filter.blimsup_and_le_inf Filter.blimsup_and_le_inf
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_left :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_right :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f q :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp_nf linter, lhs simplifies, added _aux simp version below
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and : bliminf u f p ⊔ bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
blimsup_and_le_inf (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_sup_le_and Filter.bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_left : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_right : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
/-- See also `Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp_nf linter, lhs simplifies, added _aux simp versions below
theorem blimsup_sup_le_or : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
sup_le (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
#align filter.blimsup_sup_le_or Filter.blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_left : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_right : blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
/-- See also `Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf`. -/
--@[simp] -- Porting note: simp_nf linter, lhs simplifies, added _aux simp versions below
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_sup_le_or (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_or_le_inf Filter.bliminf_or_le_inf
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_left : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_right : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f q :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
/- Porting note: Replaced `e` with `DFunLike.coe e` to override the strange
coercion to `↑(RelIso.toRelEmbedding e).toEmbedding`. -/
theorem OrderIso.apply_blimsup [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
DFunLike.coe e (blimsup u f p) = blimsup ((DFunLike.coe e) ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, map_sInf, Function.comp_apply]
congr
ext c
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := e.surjective c
simp
#align filter.order_iso.apply_blimsup Filter.OrderIso.apply_blimsup
theorem OrderIso.apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (bliminf u f p) = bliminf (e ∘ u) f p :=
OrderIso.apply_blimsup (α := αᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) e.dual
#align filter.order_iso.apply_bliminf Filter.OrderIso.apply_bliminf
theorem SupHom.apply_blimsup_le [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sSupHom α γ) :
g (blimsup u f p) ≤ blimsup (g ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup, Function.comp]
refine ((OrderHomClass.mono g).map_iInf₂_le _).trans ?_
simp only [_root_.map_iSup, le_refl]
#align filter.Sup_hom.apply_blimsup_le Filter.SupHom.apply_blimsup_le
theorem InfHom.le_apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sInfHom α γ) :
bliminf (g ∘ u) f p ≤ g (bliminf u f p) :=
SupHom.apply_blimsup_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) (sInfHom.dual g)
#align filter.Inf_hom.le_apply_bliminf Filter.InfHom.le_apply_bliminf
end CompleteLattice
section CompleteDistribLattice
variable [CompleteDistribLattice α] {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
lemma limsup_sup_filter {g} : limsup u (f ⊔ g) = limsup u f ⊔ limsup u g := by
refine le_antisymm ?_
(sup_le (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_left) (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_right))
simp_rw [limsup_eq, sInf_sup_eq, sup_sInf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf₂_iff]
intro a ha b hb
exact sInf_le ⟨ha.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_left, hb.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_right⟩
lemma liminf_sup_filter {g} : liminf u (f ⊔ g) = liminf u f ⊓ liminf u g :=
limsup_sup_filter (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_or_eq_sup : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, ← limsup_sup_filter, ← inf_sup_left, sup_principal, setOf_or]
#align filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_eq_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_or_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_sup_not : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f (¬p ·) = limsup u f := by
simp_rw [← blimsup_or_eq_sup, or_not, blimsup_true]
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_inf_not : bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f (¬p ·) = liminf u f :=
blimsup_sup_not (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_not_sup : blimsup u f (¬p ·) ⊔ blimsup u f p = limsup u f := by
simpa only [not_not] using blimsup_sup_not (p := (¬p ·))
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_not_inf : bliminf u f (¬p ·) ⊓ bliminf u f p = liminf u f :=
blimsup_not_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma limsup_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
limsup (s.piecewise u v) f = blimsup u f (· ∈ s) ⊔ blimsup v f (· ∉ s) := by
rw [← blimsup_sup_not (p := (· ∈ s))]
refine congr_arg₂ _ (blimsup_congr ?_) (blimsup_congr ?_) <;>
filter_upwards with _ h using by simp [h]
lemma liminf_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
liminf (s.piecewise u v) f = bliminf u f (· ∈ s) ⊓ bliminf v f (· ∉ s) :=
limsup_piecewise (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem sup_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊔ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_sup_eq, sup_iInf₂_eq]
congr; ext s; congr; ext hs; congr
exact (biSup_const (nonempty_of_mem hs)).symm
#align filter.sup_limsup Filter.sup_limsup
theorem inf_liminf [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊓ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ) a
#align filter.inf_liminf Filter.inf_liminf
theorem sup_liminf (a : α) : a ⊔ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf]
rw [sup_comm, biSup_sup (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [iInf₂_sup_eq, sup_comm (a := a)]
#align filter.sup_liminf Filter.sup_liminf
theorem inf_limsup (a : α) : a ⊓ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_liminf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
#align filter.inf_limsup Filter.inf_limsup
end CompleteDistribLattice
section CompleteBooleanAlgebra
variable [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α] (f : Filter β) (u : β → α)
theorem limsup_compl : (limsup u f)ᶜ = liminf (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
#align filter.limsup_compl Filter.limsup_compl
theorem liminf_compl : (liminf u f)ᶜ = limsup (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
#align filter.liminf_compl Filter.liminf_compl
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 1,176 | 1,179 | theorem limsup_sdiff (a : α) : limsup u f \ a = limsup (fun b => u b \ a) f := by |
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, sdiff_eq]
rw [biInf_inf (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [inf_comm, inf_iSup₂_eq, inf_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Fold
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Grading
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.even from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9264b15ee696b7ca83f13c8ad67c83d6eb70b730"
/-!
# The universal property of the even subalgebra
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.even Q`: The even subalgebra of `CliffordAlgebra Q`.
* `CliffordAlgebra.EvenHom`: The type of bilinear maps that satisfy the universal property of the
even subalgebra
* `CliffordAlgebra.even.lift`: The universal property of the even subalgebra, which states
that every bilinear map `f` with `f v v = Q v` and `f u v * f v w = Q v • f u w` is in unique
correspondence with an algebra morphism from `CliffordAlgebra.even Q`.
## Implementation notes
The approach here is outlined in "Computing with the universal properties of the Clifford algebra
and the even subalgebra" (to appear).
The broad summary is that we have two tricks available to us for implementing complex recursors on
top of `CliffordAlgebra.lift`: the first is to use morphisms as the output type, such as
`A = Module.End R N` which is how we obtained `CliffordAlgebra.foldr`; and the second is to use
`N = (N', S)` where `N'` is the value we wish to compute, and `S` is some auxiliary state passed
between one recursor invocation and the next.
For the universal property of the even subalgebra, we apply a variant of the first trick again by
choosing `S` to itself be a submodule of morphisms.
-/
namespace CliffordAlgebra
-- Porting note: explicit universes
universe uR uM uA uB
variable {R : Type uR} {M : Type uM} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
-- put this after `Q` since we want to talk about morphisms from `CliffordAlgebra Q` to `A` and
-- that order is more natural
variable {A : Type uA} {B : Type uB} [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
open scoped DirectSum
variable (Q)
/-- The even submodule `CliffordAlgebra.evenOdd Q 0` is also a subalgebra. -/
def even : Subalgebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
(evenOdd Q 0).toSubalgebra (SetLike.one_mem_graded _) fun _x _y hx hy =>
add_zero (0 : ZMod 2) ▸ SetLike.mul_mem_graded hx hy
#align clifford_algebra.even CliffordAlgebra.even
-- Porting note: added, otherwise Lean can't find this when it needs it
instance : AddCommMonoid (even Q) := AddSubmonoidClass.toAddCommMonoid _
@[simp]
theorem even_toSubmodule : Subalgebra.toSubmodule (even Q) = evenOdd Q 0 :=
rfl
#align clifford_algebra.even_to_submodule CliffordAlgebra.even_toSubmodule
variable (A)
/-- The type of bilinear maps which are accepted by `CliffordAlgebra.even.lift`. -/
@[ext]
structure EvenHom : Type max uA uM where
bilin : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] A
contract (m : M) : bilin m m = algebraMap R A (Q m)
contract_mid (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) : bilin m₁ m₂ * bilin m₂ m₃ = Q m₂ • bilin m₁ m₃
#align clifford_algebra.even_hom CliffordAlgebra.EvenHom
variable {A Q}
/-- Compose an `EvenHom` with an `AlgHom` on the output. -/
@[simps]
def EvenHom.compr₂ (g : EvenHom Q A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : EvenHom Q B where
bilin := g.bilin.compr₂ f.toLinearMap
contract _m := (f.congr_arg <| g.contract _).trans <| f.commutes _
contract_mid _m₁ _m₂ _m₃ :=
(f.map_mul _ _).symm.trans <| (f.congr_arg <| g.contract_mid _ _ _).trans <| f.map_smul _ _
#align clifford_algebra.even_hom.compr₂ CliffordAlgebra.EvenHom.compr₂
variable (Q)
/-- The embedding of pairs of vectors into the even subalgebra, as a bilinear map. -/
nonrec def even.ι : EvenHom Q (even Q) where
bilin :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (fun m₁ m₂ => ⟨ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂, ι_mul_ι_mem_evenOdd_zero Q _ _⟩)
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [LinearMap.map_add, add_mul]; rfl)
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [LinearMap.map_smul, smul_mul_assoc]; rfl)
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [LinearMap.map_add, mul_add]; rfl) fun _ _ _ => by
simp only [LinearMap.map_smul, mul_smul_comm]; rfl
contract m := Subtype.ext <| ι_sq_scalar Q m
contract_mid m₁ m₂ m₃ :=
Subtype.ext <|
calc
ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂ * (ι Q m₂ * ι Q m₃) = ι Q m₁ * (ι Q m₂ * ι Q m₂ * ι Q m₃) := by
simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = Q m₂ • (ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₃) := by rw [Algebra.smul_def, ι_sq_scalar, Algebra.left_comm]
#align clifford_algebra.even.ι CliffordAlgebra.even.ι
instance : Inhabited (EvenHom Q (even Q)) :=
⟨even.ι Q⟩
variable (f : EvenHom Q A)
/-- Two algebra morphisms from the even subalgebra are equal if they agree on pairs of generators.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Even.lean | 116 | 128 | theorem even.algHom_ext ⦃f g : even Q →ₐ[R] A⦄ (h : (even.ι Q).compr₂ f = (even.ι Q).compr₂ g) :
f = g := by |
rw [EvenHom.ext_iff] at h
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
induction x, hx using even_induction with
| algebraMap r =>
exact (f.commutes r).trans (g.commutes r).symm
| add x y hx hy ihx ihy =>
have := congr_arg₂ (· + ·) ihx ihy
exact (f.map_add _ _).trans (this.trans <| (g.map_add _ _).symm)
| ι_mul_ι_mul m₁ m₂ x hx ih =>
have := congr_arg₂ (· * ·) (LinearMap.congr_fun (LinearMap.congr_fun h m₁) m₂) ih
exact (f.map_mul _ _).trans (this.trans <| (g.map_mul _ _).symm)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Felix Weilacher
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Cardinality
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Perfect
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.Topology.CountableSeparatingOn
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.polish from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# The Borel sigma-algebra on Polish spaces
We discuss several results pertaining to the relationship between the topology and the Borel
structure on Polish spaces.
## Main definitions and results
First, we define standard Borel spaces.
* A `StandardBorelSpace α` is a typeclass for measurable spaces which arise as the Borel sets
of some Polish topology.
Next, we define the class of analytic sets and establish its basic properties.
* `MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet s`: a set in a topological space is analytic if it is the continuous
image of a Polish space. Equivalently, it is empty, or the image of `ℕ → ℕ`.
* `MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous`: a continuous image of an analytic set is
analytic.
* `MeasurableSet.analyticSet`: in a Polish space, any Borel-measurable set is analytic.
Then, we show Lusin's theorem that two disjoint analytic sets can be separated by Borel sets.
* `MeasurablySeparable s t` states that there exists a measurable set containing `s` and disjoint
from `t`.
* `AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable` shows that two disjoint analytic sets are separated by a
Borel set.
We then prove the Lusin-Souslin theorem that a continuous injective image of a Borel subset of
a Polish space is Borel. The proof of this nontrivial result relies on the above results on
analytic sets.
* `MeasurableSet.image_of_continuousOn_injOn` asserts that, if `s` is a Borel measurable set in
a Polish space, then the image of `s` under a continuous injective map is still Borel measurable.
* `Continuous.measurableEmbedding` states that a continuous injective map on a Polish space
is a measurable embedding for the Borel sigma-algebra.
* `ContinuousOn.measurableEmbedding` is the same result for a map restricted to a measurable set
on which it is continuous.
* `Measurable.measurableEmbedding` states that a measurable injective map from
a standard Borel space to a second-countable topological space is a measurable embedding.
* `isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`: in a Polish space, a set is clopenable (i.e., it can be made
open and closed by using a finer Polish topology) if and only if it is Borel-measurable.
We use this to prove several versions of the Borel isomorphism theorem.
* `PolishSpace.measurableEquivOfNotCountable` : Any two uncountable standard Borel spaces
are Borel isomorphic.
* `PolishSpace.Equiv.measurableEquiv` : Any two standard Borel spaces of the same cardinality
are Borel isomorphic.
-/
open Set Function PolishSpace PiNat TopologicalSpace Bornology Metric Filter Topology MeasureTheory
/-! ### Standard Borel Spaces -/
variable (α : Type*)
/-- A standard Borel space is a measurable space arising as the Borel sets of some Polish topology.
This is useful in situations where a space has no natural topology or
the natural topology in a space is non-Polish.
To endow a standard Borel space `α` with a compatible Polish topology, use
`letI := upgradeStandardBorel α`. One can then use `eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel α` to
rewrite the `MeasurableSpace α` instance to `borel α t`, where `t` is the new topology. -/
class StandardBorelSpace [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
/-- There exists a compatible Polish topology. -/
polish : ∃ _ : TopologicalSpace α, BorelSpace α ∧ PolishSpace α
/-- A convenience class similar to `UpgradedPolishSpace`. No instance should be registered.
Instead one should use `letI := upgradeStandardBorel α`. -/
class UpgradedStandardBorel extends MeasurableSpace α, TopologicalSpace α,
BorelSpace α, PolishSpace α
/-- Use as `letI := upgradeStandardBorel α` to endow a standard Borel space `α` with
a compatible Polish topology.
Warning: following this with `borelize α` will cause an error. Instead, one can
rewrite with `eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel α`.
TODO: fix the corresponding bug in `borelize`. -/
noncomputable
def upgradeStandardBorel [MeasurableSpace α] [h : StandardBorelSpace α] :
UpgradedStandardBorel α := by
choose τ hb hp using h.polish
constructor
/-- The `MeasurableSpace α` instance on a `StandardBorelSpace` `α` is equal to
the borel sets of `upgradeStandardBorel α`. -/
theorem eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel [MeasurableSpace α] [StandardBorelSpace α] :
‹MeasurableSpace α› = @borel _ (upgradeStandardBorel α).toTopologicalSpace :=
@BorelSpace.measurable_eq _ (upgradeStandardBorel α).toTopologicalSpace _
(upgradeStandardBorel α).toBorelSpace
variable {α}
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
instance standardBorel_of_polish [τ : TopologicalSpace α]
[BorelSpace α] [PolishSpace α] : StandardBorelSpace α := by exists τ
instance countablyGenerated_of_standardBorel [StandardBorelSpace α] :
MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated α :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
inferInstance
instance measurableSingleton_of_standardBorel [StandardBorelSpace α] : MeasurableSingletonClass α :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
inferInstance
namespace StandardBorelSpace
variable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β]
section instances
/-- A product of two standard Borel spaces is standard Borel. -/
instance prod [StandardBorelSpace α] [StandardBorelSpace β] : StandardBorelSpace (α × β) :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
letI := upgradeStandardBorel β
inferInstance
/-- A product of countably many standard Borel spaces is standard Borel. -/
instance pi_countable {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {α : ι → Type*} [∀ n, MeasurableSpace (α n)]
[∀ n, StandardBorelSpace (α n)] : StandardBorelSpace (∀ n, α n) :=
letI := fun n => upgradeStandardBorel (α n)
inferInstance
end instances
end StandardBorelSpace
end section
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-! ### Analytic sets -/
/-- An analytic set is a set which is the continuous image of some Polish space. There are several
equivalent characterizations of this definition. For the definition, we pick one that avoids
universe issues: a set is analytic if and only if it is a continuous image of `ℕ → ℕ` (or if it
is empty). The above more usual characterization is given
in `analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range`.
Warning: these are analytic sets in the context of descriptive set theory (which is why they are
registered in the namespace `MeasureTheory`). They have nothing to do with analytic sets in the
context of complex analysis. -/
irreducible_def AnalyticSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s = ∅ ∨ ∃ f : (ℕ → ℕ) → α, Continuous f ∧ range f = s
#align measure_theory.analytic_set MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet
theorem analyticSet_empty : AnalyticSet (∅ : Set α) := by
rw [AnalyticSet]
exact Or.inl rfl
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_empty MeasureTheory.analyticSet_empty
theorem analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PolishSpace β]
{f : β → α} (f_cont : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (range f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· rw [range_eq_empty]
exact analyticSet_empty
· rw [AnalyticSet]
obtain ⟨g, g_cont, hg⟩ : ∃ g : (ℕ → ℕ) → β, Continuous g ∧ Surjective g :=
exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective β
refine Or.inr ⟨f ∘ g, f_cont.comp g_cont, ?_⟩
rw [hg.range_comp]
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_range_of_polish_space MeasureTheory.analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace
/-- The image of an open set under a continuous map is analytic. -/
theorem _root_.IsOpen.analyticSet_image {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PolishSpace β]
{s : Set β} (hs : IsOpen s) {f : β → α} (f_cont : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) := by
rw [image_eq_range]
haveI : PolishSpace s := hs.polishSpace
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace (f_cont.comp continuous_subtype_val)
#align is_open.analytic_set_image IsOpen.analyticSet_image
/-- A set is analytic if and only if it is the continuous image of some Polish space. -/
theorem analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range {s : Set α} :
AnalyticSet s ↔
∃ (β : Type) (h : TopologicalSpace β) (_ : @PolishSpace β h) (f : β → α),
@Continuous _ _ h _ f ∧ range f = s := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [AnalyticSet] at h
cases' h with h h
· refine ⟨Empty, inferInstance, inferInstance, Empty.elim, continuous_bot, ?_⟩
rw [h]
exact range_eq_empty _
· exact ⟨ℕ → ℕ, inferInstance, inferInstance, h⟩
· rintro ⟨β, h, h', f, f_cont, f_range⟩
rw [← f_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace f_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_iff_exists_polish_space_range MeasureTheory.analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range
/-- The continuous image of an analytic set is analytic -/
theorem AnalyticSet.image_of_continuousOn {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
(hs : AnalyticSet s) {f : α → β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) := by
rcases analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 hs with ⟨γ, γtop, γpolish, g, g_cont, gs⟩
have : f '' s = range (f ∘ g) := by rw [range_comp, gs]
rw [this]
apply analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace
apply hf.comp_continuous g_cont fun x => _
rw [← gs]
exact mem_range_self
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.image_of_continuous_on MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuousOn
theorem AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
(hs : AnalyticSet s) {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.image_of_continuous MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous
/-- A countable intersection of analytic sets is analytic. -/
theorem AnalyticSet.iInter [hι : Nonempty ι] [Countable ι] [T2Space α] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, AnalyticSet (s n)) : AnalyticSet (⋂ n, s n) := by
rcases hι with ⟨i₀⟩
/- For the proof, write each `s n` as the continuous image under a map `f n` of a
Polish space `β n`. The product space `γ = Π n, β n` is also Polish, and so is the subset
`t` of sequences `x n` for which `f n (x n)` is independent of `n`. The set `t` is Polish, and
the range of `x ↦ f 0 (x 0)` on `t` is exactly `⋂ n, s n`, so this set is analytic. -/
choose β hβ h'β f f_cont f_range using fun n =>
analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 (hs n)
let γ := ∀ n, β n
let t : Set γ := ⋂ n, { x | f n (x n) = f i₀ (x i₀) }
have t_closed : IsClosed t := by
apply isClosed_iInter
intro n
exact
isClosed_eq ((f_cont n).comp (continuous_apply n)) ((f_cont i₀).comp (continuous_apply i₀))
haveI : PolishSpace t := t_closed.polishSpace
let F : t → α := fun x => f i₀ ((x : γ) i₀)
have F_cont : Continuous F := (f_cont i₀).comp ((continuous_apply i₀).comp continuous_subtype_val)
have F_range : range F = ⋂ n : ι, s n := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro y ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine mem_iInter.2 fun n => ?_
have : f n ((x : γ) n) = F x := (mem_iInter.1 x.2 n : _)
rw [← this, ← f_range n]
exact mem_range_self _
· intro y hy
have A : ∀ n, ∃ x : β n, f n x = y := by
intro n
rw [← mem_range, f_range n]
exact mem_iInter.1 hy n
choose x hx using A
have xt : x ∈ t := by
refine mem_iInter.2 fun n => ?_
simp [hx]
refine ⟨⟨x, xt⟩, ?_⟩
exact hx i₀
rw [← F_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace F_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.Inter MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.iInter
/-- A countable union of analytic sets is analytic. -/
theorem AnalyticSet.iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ n, AnalyticSet (s n)) :
AnalyticSet (⋃ n, s n) := by
/- For the proof, write each `s n` as the continuous image under a map `f n` of a
Polish space `β n`. The union space `γ = Σ n, β n` is also Polish, and the map `F : γ → α` which
coincides with `f n` on `β n` sends it to `⋃ n, s n`. -/
choose β hβ h'β f f_cont f_range using fun n =>
analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 (hs n)
let γ := Σn, β n
let F : γ → α := fun ⟨n, x⟩ ↦ f n x
have F_cont : Continuous F := continuous_sigma f_cont
have F_range : range F = ⋃ n, s n := by
simp only [γ, range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range, f_range]
rw [← F_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace F_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.Union MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.iUnion
theorem _root_.IsClosed.analyticSet [PolishSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) :
AnalyticSet s := by
haveI : PolishSpace s := hs.polishSpace
rw [← @Subtype.range_val α s]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace continuous_subtype_val
#align is_closed.analytic_set IsClosed.analyticSet
/-- Given a Borel-measurable set in a Polish space, there exists a finer Polish topology making
it clopen. This is in fact an equivalence, see `isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.isClopenable [PolishSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α]
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : IsClopenable s := by
revert s
apply MeasurableSet.induction_on_open
· exact fun u hu => hu.isClopenable
· exact fun u _ h'u => h'u.compl
· exact fun f _ _ hf => IsClopenable.iUnion hf
#align measurable_set.is_clopenable MeasurableSet.isClopenable
/-- A Borel-measurable set in a Polish space is analytic. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.analyticSet {α : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α]
[MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : AnalyticSet s := by
/- For a short proof (avoiding measurable induction), one sees `s` as a closed set for a finer
topology `t'`. It is analytic for this topology. As the identity from `t'` to `t` is continuous
and the image of an analytic set is analytic, it follows that `s` is also analytic for `t`. -/
obtain ⟨t', t't, t'_polish, s_closed, _⟩ :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' ∧ IsClosed[t'] s ∧ IsOpen[t'] s :=
hs.isClopenable
have A := @IsClosed.analyticSet α t' t'_polish s s_closed
convert @AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous α t' α t s A id (continuous_id_of_le t't)
simp only [id, image_id']
#align measurable_set.analytic_set MeasurableSet.analyticSet
/-- Given a Borel-measurable function from a Polish space to a second-countable space, there exists
a finer Polish topology on the source space for which the function is continuous. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.exists_continuous {α β : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α]
[MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[OpensMeasurableSpace β] {f : α → β} [SecondCountableTopology (range f)] (hf : Measurable f) :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, t' ≤ t ∧ @Continuous α β t' tβ f ∧ @PolishSpace α t' := by
obtain ⟨b, b_count, -, hb⟩ :
∃ b : Set (Set (range f)), b.Countable ∧ ∅ ∉ b ∧ IsTopologicalBasis b :=
exists_countable_basis (range f)
haveI : Countable b := b_count.to_subtype
have : ∀ s : b, IsClopenable (rangeFactorization f ⁻¹' s) := fun s ↦ by
apply MeasurableSet.isClopenable
exact hf.subtype_mk (hb.isOpen s.2).measurableSet
choose T Tt Tpolish _ Topen using this
obtain ⟨t', t'T, t't, t'_polish⟩ :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, (∀ i, t' ≤ T i) ∧ t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' :=
exists_polishSpace_forall_le (t := t) T Tt Tpolish
refine ⟨t', t't, ?_, t'_polish⟩
have : Continuous[t', _] (rangeFactorization f) :=
hb.continuous_iff.2 fun s hs => t'T ⟨s, hs⟩ _ (Topen ⟨s, hs⟩)
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp this
#align measurable.exists_continuous Measurable.exists_continuous
/-- The image of a measurable set in a standard Borel space under a measurable map
is an analytic set. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.analyticSet_image {X Y : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X]
[StandardBorelSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace Y] {f : X → Y} [SecondCountableTopology (range f)] {s : Set X}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Measurable f) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) := by
letI := upgradeStandardBorel X
rw [eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel X] at hs
rcases hf.exists_continuous with ⟨τ', hle, hfc, hτ'⟩
letI m' : MeasurableSpace X := @borel _ τ'
haveI b' : BorelSpace X := ⟨rfl⟩
have hle := borel_anti hle
exact (hle _ hs).analyticSet.image_of_continuous hfc
#align measurable_set.analytic_set_image MeasurableSet.analyticSet_image
/-- Preimage of an analytic set is an analytic set. -/
protected lemma AnalyticSet.preimage {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[PolishSpace X] [T2Space Y] {s : Set Y} (hs : AnalyticSet s) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
AnalyticSet (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rcases analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 hs with ⟨Z, _, _, g, hg, rfl⟩
have : IsClosed {x : X × Z | f x.1 = g x.2} := isClosed_diagonal.preimage (hf.prod_map hg)
convert this.analyticSet.image_of_continuous continuous_fst
ext x
simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Separating sets with measurable sets -/
/-- Two sets `u` and `v` in a measurable space are measurably separable if there
exists a measurable set containing `u` and disjoint from `v`.
This is mostly interesting for Borel-separable sets. -/
def MeasurablySeparable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (s t : Set α) : Prop :=
∃ u, s ⊆ u ∧ Disjoint t u ∧ MeasurableSet u
#align measure_theory.measurably_separable MeasureTheory.MeasurablySeparable
theorem MeasurablySeparable.iUnion [Countable ι] {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ m n, MeasurablySeparable (s m) (t n)) : MeasurablySeparable (⋃ n, s n) (⋃ m, t m) := by
choose u hsu htu hu using h
refine ⟨⋃ m, ⋂ n, u m n, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine iUnion_subset fun m => subset_iUnion_of_subset m ?_
exact subset_iInter fun n => hsu m n
· simp_rw [disjoint_iUnion_left, disjoint_iUnion_right]
intro n m
apply Disjoint.mono_right _ (htu m n)
apply iInter_subset
· refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun m => ?_
exact MeasurableSet.iInter fun n => hu m n
#align measure_theory.measurably_separable.Union MeasureTheory.MeasurablySeparable.iUnion
/-- The hard part of the Lusin separation theorem saying that two disjoint analytic sets are
contained in disjoint Borel sets (see the full statement in `AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable`).
Here, we prove this when our analytic sets are the ranges of functions from `ℕ → ℕ`.
-/
theorem measurablySeparable_range_of_disjoint [T2Space α] [MeasurableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] {f g : (ℕ → ℕ) → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g)
(h : Disjoint (range f) (range g)) : MeasurablySeparable (range f) (range g) := by
/- We follow [Kechris, *Classical Descriptive Set Theory* (Theorem 14.7)][kechris1995].
If the ranges are not Borel-separated, then one can find two cylinders of length one whose
images are not Borel-separated, and then two smaller cylinders of length two whose images are
not Borel-separated, and so on. One thus gets two sequences of cylinders, that decrease to two
points `x` and `y`. Their images are different by the disjointness assumption, hence contained
in two disjoint open sets by the T2 property. By continuity, long enough cylinders around `x`
and `y` have images which are separated by these two disjoint open sets, a contradiction.
-/
by_contra hfg
have I : ∀ n x y, ¬MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder x n) (g '' cylinder y n) →
∃ x' y', x' ∈ cylinder x n ∧ y' ∈ cylinder y n ∧
¬MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder x' (n + 1)) (g '' cylinder y' (n + 1)) := by
intro n x y
contrapose!
intro H
rw [← iUnion_cylinder_update x n, ← iUnion_cylinder_update y n, image_iUnion, image_iUnion]
refine MeasurablySeparable.iUnion fun i j => ?_
exact H _ _ (update_mem_cylinder _ _ _) (update_mem_cylinder _ _ _)
-- consider the set of pairs of cylinders of some length whose images are not Borel-separated
let A :=
{ p : ℕ × (ℕ → ℕ) × (ℕ → ℕ) //
¬MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder p.2.1 p.1) (g '' cylinder p.2.2 p.1) }
-- for each such pair, one can find longer cylinders whose images are not Borel-separated either
have : ∀ p : A, ∃ q : A,
q.1.1 = p.1.1 + 1 ∧ q.1.2.1 ∈ cylinder p.1.2.1 p.1.1 ∧ q.1.2.2 ∈ cylinder p.1.2.2 p.1.1 := by
rintro ⟨⟨n, x, y⟩, hp⟩
rcases I n x y hp with ⟨x', y', hx', hy', h'⟩
exact ⟨⟨⟨n + 1, x', y'⟩, h'⟩, rfl, hx', hy'⟩
choose F hFn hFx hFy using this
let p0 : A := ⟨⟨0, fun _ => 0, fun _ => 0⟩, by simp [hfg]⟩
-- construct inductively decreasing sequences of cylinders whose images are not separated
let p : ℕ → A := fun n => F^[n] p0
have prec : ∀ n, p (n + 1) = F (p n) := fun n => by simp only [p, iterate_succ', Function.comp]
-- check that at the `n`-th step we deal with cylinders of length `n`
have pn_fst : ∀ n, (p n).1.1 = n := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
· simp only [prec, hFn, IH]
-- check that the cylinders we construct are indeed decreasing, by checking that the coordinates
-- are stationary.
have Ix : ∀ m n, m + 1 ≤ n → (p n).1.2.1 m = (p (m + 1)).1.2.1 m := by
intro m
apply Nat.le_induction
· rfl
intro n hmn IH
have I : (F (p n)).val.snd.fst m = (p n).val.snd.fst m := by
apply hFx (p n) m
rw [pn_fst]
exact hmn
rw [prec, I, IH]
have Iy : ∀ m n, m + 1 ≤ n → (p n).1.2.2 m = (p (m + 1)).1.2.2 m := by
intro m
apply Nat.le_induction
· rfl
intro n hmn IH
have I : (F (p n)).val.snd.snd m = (p n).val.snd.snd m := by
apply hFy (p n) m
rw [pn_fst]
exact hmn
rw [prec, I, IH]
-- denote by `x` and `y` the limit points of these two sequences of cylinders.
set x : ℕ → ℕ := fun n => (p (n + 1)).1.2.1 n with hx
set y : ℕ → ℕ := fun n => (p (n + 1)).1.2.2 n with hy
-- by design, the cylinders around these points have images which are not Borel-separable.
have M : ∀ n, ¬MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder x n) (g '' cylinder y n) := by
intro n
convert (p n).2 using 3
· rw [pn_fst, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq, mem_cylinder_iff]
intro i hi
rw [hx]
exact (Ix i n hi).symm
· rw [pn_fst, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq, mem_cylinder_iff]
intro i hi
rw [hy]
exact (Iy i n hi).symm
-- consider two open sets separating `f x` and `g y`.
obtain ⟨u, v, u_open, v_open, xu, yv, huv⟩ :
∃ u v : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ f x ∈ u ∧ g y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v := by
apply t2_separation
exact disjoint_iff_forall_ne.1 h (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _)
letI : MetricSpace (ℕ → ℕ) := metricSpaceNatNat
obtain ⟨εx, εxpos, hεx⟩ : ∃ (εx : ℝ), εx > 0 ∧ Metric.ball x εx ⊆ f ⁻¹' u := by
apply Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1
exact hf.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds (u_open.mem_nhds xu)
obtain ⟨εy, εypos, hεy⟩ : ∃ (εy : ℝ), εy > 0 ∧ Metric.ball y εy ⊆ g ⁻¹' v := by
apply Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1
exact hg.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds yv)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < min εx εy :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (lt_min εxpos εypos) (by norm_num)
-- for large enough `n`, these open sets separate the images of long cylinders around `x` and `y`
have B : MeasurablySeparable (f '' cylinder x n) (g '' cylinder y n) := by
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, u_open.measurableSet⟩
· rw [image_subset_iff]
apply Subset.trans _ hεx
intro z hz
rw [mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le] at hz
exact hz.trans_lt (hn.trans_le (min_le_left _ _))
· refine Disjoint.mono_left ?_ huv.symm
change g '' cylinder y n ⊆ v
rw [image_subset_iff]
apply Subset.trans _ hεy
intro z hz
rw [mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le] at hz
exact hz.trans_lt (hn.trans_le (min_le_right _ _))
-- this is a contradiction.
exact M n B
#align measure_theory.measurably_separable_range_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.measurablySeparable_range_of_disjoint
/-- The **Lusin separation theorem**: if two analytic sets are disjoint, then they are contained in
disjoint Borel sets. -/
theorem AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable [T2Space α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{s t : Set α} (hs : AnalyticSet s) (ht : AnalyticSet t) (h : Disjoint s t) :
MeasurablySeparable s t := by
rw [AnalyticSet] at hs ht
rcases hs with (rfl | ⟨f, f_cont, rfl⟩)
· refine ⟨∅, Subset.refl _, by simp, MeasurableSet.empty⟩
rcases ht with (rfl | ⟨g, g_cont, rfl⟩)
· exact ⟨univ, subset_univ _, by simp, MeasurableSet.univ⟩
exact measurablySeparable_range_of_disjoint f_cont g_cont h
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.measurably_separable MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable
/-- **Suslin's Theorem**: in a Hausdorff topological space, an analytic set with an analytic
complement is measurable. -/
theorem AnalyticSet.measurableSet_of_compl [T2Space α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{s : Set α} (hs : AnalyticSet s) (hsc : AnalyticSet sᶜ) : MeasurableSet s := by
rcases hs.measurablySeparable hsc disjoint_compl_right with ⟨u, hsu, hdu, hmu⟩
obtain rfl : s = u := hsu.antisymm (disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.1 hdu)
exact hmu
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.measurable_set_of_compl MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.measurableSet_of_compl
end MeasureTheory
/-!
### Measurability of preimages under measurable maps
-/
namespace Measurable
open MeasurableSpace
variable {X Y Z β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [StandardBorelSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space Y] [MeasurableSpace Y] [OpensMeasurableSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace Z]
/-- If `f : X → Z` is a surjective Borel measurable map from a standard Borel space
to a countably separated measurable space, then the preimage of a set `s`
is measurable if and only if the set is measurable.
One implication is the definition of measurability, the other one heavily relies on `X` being a
standard Borel space. -/
theorem measurableSet_preimage_iff_of_surjective [CountablySeparated Z]
{f : X → Z} (hf : Measurable f) (hsurj : Surjective f) {s : Set Z} :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) ↔ MeasurableSet s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => hf h⟩
rcases exists_opensMeasurableSpace_of_countablySeparated Z with ⟨τ, _, _, _⟩
apply AnalyticSet.measurableSet_of_compl
· rw [← image_preimage_eq s hsurj]
exact h.analyticSet_image hf
· rw [← image_preimage_eq sᶜ hsurj]
exact h.compl.analyticSet_image hf
#align measurable.measurable_set_preimage_iff_of_surjective Measurable.measurableSet_preimage_iff_of_surjective
theorem map_measurableSpace_eq [CountablySeparated Z]
{f : X → Z} (hf : Measurable f)
(hsurj : Surjective f) : MeasurableSpace.map f ‹MeasurableSpace X› = ‹MeasurableSpace Z› :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => hf.measurableSet_preimage_iff_of_surjective hsurj
#align measurable.map_measurable_space_eq Measurable.map_measurableSpace_eq
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Polish.lean | 566 | 570 | theorem map_measurableSpace_eq_borel [SecondCountableTopology Y] {f : X → Y} (hf : Measurable f)
(hsurj : Surjective f) : MeasurableSpace.map f ‹MeasurableSpace X› = borel Y := by |
have d := hf.mono le_rfl OpensMeasurableSpace.borel_le
letI := borel Y; haveI : BorelSpace Y := ⟨rfl⟩
exact d.map_measurableSpace_eq hsurj
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.TypeTags
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ZMod
#align_import data.zmod.quotient from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"da420a8c6dd5bdfb85c4ced85c34388f633bc6ff"
/-!
# `ZMod n` and quotient groups / rings
This file relates `ZMod n` to the quotient group
`ℤ / AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ)` and to the quotient ring
`ℤ ⧸ Ideal.span {(n : ℤ)}`.
## Main definitions
- `ZMod.quotientZMultiplesNatEquivZMod` and `ZMod.quotientZMultiplesEquivZMod`:
`ZMod n` is the group quotient of `ℤ` by `n ℤ := AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n)`,
(where `n : ℕ` and `n : ℤ` respectively)
- `ZMod.quotient_span_nat_equiv_zmod` and `ZMod.quotientSpanEquivZMod `:
`ZMod n` is the ring quotient of `ℤ` by `n ℤ : Ideal.span {n}`
(where `n : ℕ` and `n : ℤ` respectively)
- `ZMod.lift n f` is the map from `ZMod n` induced by `f : ℤ →+ A` that maps `n` to `0`.
## Tags
zmod, quotient group, quotient ring, ideal quotient
-/
open QuotientAddGroup Set ZMod
variable (n : ℕ) {A R : Type*} [AddGroup A] [Ring R]
namespace Int
/-- `ℤ` modulo multiples of `n : ℕ` is `ZMod n`. -/
def quotientZMultiplesNatEquivZMod : ℤ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) ≃+ ZMod n :=
(quotientAddEquivOfEq (ZMod.ker_intCastAddHom _)).symm.trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)) cast intCast_zmod_cast
#align int.quotient_zmultiples_nat_equiv_zmod Int.quotientZMultiplesNatEquivZMod
/-- `ℤ` modulo multiples of `a : ℤ` is `ZMod a.natAbs`. -/
def quotientZMultiplesEquivZMod (a : ℤ) : ℤ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples a ≃+ ZMod a.natAbs :=
(quotientAddEquivOfEq (zmultiples_natAbs a)).symm.trans (quotientZMultiplesNatEquivZMod a.natAbs)
#align int.quotient_zmultiples_equiv_zmod Int.quotientZMultiplesEquivZMod
/-- `ℤ` modulo the ideal generated by `n : ℕ` is `ZMod n`. -/
def quotientSpanNatEquivZMod : ℤ ⧸ Ideal.span {(n : ℤ)} ≃+* ZMod n :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq (ZMod.ker_intCastRingHom _)).symm.trans <|
RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse <|
show Function.RightInverse ZMod.cast (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n)) from intCast_zmod_cast
#align int.quotient_span_nat_equiv_zmod Int.quotientSpanNatEquivZMod
/-- `ℤ` modulo the ideal generated by `a : ℤ` is `ZMod a.natAbs`. -/
def quotientSpanEquivZMod (a : ℤ) : ℤ ⧸ Ideal.span ({a} : Set ℤ) ≃+* ZMod a.natAbs :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq (span_natAbs a)).symm.trans (quotientSpanNatEquivZMod a.natAbs)
#align int.quotient_span_equiv_zmod Int.quotientSpanEquivZMod
end Int
noncomputable section ChineseRemainder
open Ideal
/-- The **Chinese remainder theorem**, elementary version for `ZMod`. See also
`Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic` for versions involving only two numbers. -/
def ZMod.prodEquivPi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (a : ι → ℕ)
(coprime : Pairwise fun i j => Nat.Coprime (a i) (a j)) : ZMod (∏ i, a i) ≃+* Π i, ZMod (a i) :=
have : Pairwise fun i j => IsCoprime (span {(a i : ℤ)}) (span {(a j : ℤ)}) :=
fun _i _j h ↦ (isCoprime_span_singleton_iff _ _).mpr ((coprime h).cast (R := ℤ))
Int.quotientSpanNatEquivZMod _ |>.symm.trans <|
quotEquivOfEq (iInf_span_singleton_natCast (R := ℤ) coprime) |>.symm.trans <|
quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient _ this |>.trans <|
RingEquiv.piCongrRight fun i ↦ Int.quotientSpanNatEquivZMod (a i)
end ChineseRemainder
namespace AddAction
open AddSubgroup AddMonoidHom AddEquiv Function
variable {α β : Type*} [AddGroup α] (a : α) [AddAction α β] (b : β)
/-- The quotient `(ℤ ∙ a) ⧸ (stabilizer b)` is cyclic of order `minimalPeriod (a +ᵥ ·) b`. -/
noncomputable def zmultiplesQuotientStabilizerEquiv :
zmultiples a ⧸ stabilizer (zmultiples a) b ≃+ ZMod (minimalPeriod (a +ᵥ ·) b) :=
(ofBijective
(map _ (stabilizer (zmultiples a) b) (zmultiplesHom (zmultiples a) ⟨a, mem_zmultiples a⟩)
(by
rw [zmultiples_le, mem_comap, mem_stabilizer_iff, zmultiplesHom_apply, natCast_zsmul]
simp_rw [← vadd_iterate]
exact isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (a +ᵥ ·) b))
⟨by
rw [← ker_eq_bot_iff, eq_bot_iff]
refine fun q => induction_on' q fun n hn => ?_
rw [mem_bot, eq_zero_iff, Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, ←
zsmul_vadd_eq_iff_minimalPeriod_dvd]
exact (eq_zero_iff _).mp hn, fun q =>
induction_on' q fun ⟨_, n, rfl⟩ => ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩).symm.trans
(Int.quotientZMultiplesNatEquivZMod (minimalPeriod (a +ᵥ ·) b))
#align add_action.zmultiples_quotient_stabilizer_equiv AddAction.zmultiplesQuotientStabilizerEquiv
theorem zmultiplesQuotientStabilizerEquiv_symm_apply (n : ZMod (minimalPeriod (a +ᵥ ·) b)) :
(zmultiplesQuotientStabilizerEquiv a b).symm n =
(cast n : ℤ) • (⟨a, mem_zmultiples a⟩ : zmultiples a) :=
rfl
#align add_action.zmultiples_quotient_stabilizer_equiv_symm_apply AddAction.zmultiplesQuotientStabilizerEquiv_symm_apply
end AddAction
namespace MulAction
open AddAction Subgroup AddSubgroup Function
variable {α β : Type*} [Group α] (a : α) [MulAction α β] (b : β)
/-- The quotient `(a ^ ℤ) ⧸ (stabilizer b)` is cyclic of order `minimalPeriod ((•) a) b`. -/
noncomputable def zpowersQuotientStabilizerEquiv :
zpowers a ⧸ stabilizer (zpowers a) b ≃* Multiplicative (ZMod (minimalPeriod (a • ·) b)) :=
letI f := zmultiplesQuotientStabilizerEquiv (Additive.ofMul a) b
AddEquiv.toMultiplicative f
#align mul_action.zpowers_quotient_stabilizer_equiv MulAction.zpowersQuotientStabilizerEquiv
theorem zpowersQuotientStabilizerEquiv_symm_apply (n : ZMod (minimalPeriod (a • ·) b)) :
(zpowersQuotientStabilizerEquiv a b).symm n = (⟨a, mem_zpowers a⟩ : zpowers a) ^ (cast n : ℤ) :=
rfl
#align mul_action.zpowers_quotient_stabilizer_equiv_symm_apply MulAction.zpowersQuotientStabilizerEquiv_symm_apply
/-- The orbit `(a ^ ℤ) • b` is a cycle of order `minimalPeriod ((•) a) b`. -/
noncomputable def orbitZPowersEquiv : orbit (zpowers a) b ≃ ZMod (minimalPeriod (a • ·) b) :=
(orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer _ b).trans (zpowersQuotientStabilizerEquiv a b).toEquiv
#align mul_action.orbit_zpowers_equiv MulAction.orbitZPowersEquiv
/-- The orbit `(ℤ • a) +ᵥ b` is a cycle of order `minimalPeriod (a +ᵥ ·) b`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddAction.orbitZMultiplesEquiv {α β : Type*} [AddGroup α] (a : α)
[AddAction α β] (b : β) :
AddAction.orbit (zmultiples a) b ≃ ZMod (minimalPeriod (a +ᵥ ·) b) :=
(AddAction.orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer (zmultiples a) b).trans
(zmultiplesQuotientStabilizerEquiv a b).toEquiv
#align add_action.orbit_zmultiples_equiv AddAction.orbitZMultiplesEquiv
attribute [to_additive existing] orbitZPowersEquiv
@[to_additive]
theorem orbitZPowersEquiv_symm_apply (k : ZMod (minimalPeriod (a • ·) b)) :
(orbitZPowersEquiv a b).symm k =
(⟨a, mem_zpowers a⟩ : zpowers a) ^ (cast k : ℤ) • ⟨b, mem_orbit_self b⟩ :=
rfl
#align mul_action.orbit_zpowers_equiv_symm_apply MulAction.orbitZPowersEquiv_symm_apply
#align add_action.orbit_zmultiples_equiv_symm_apply AddAction.orbitZMultiplesEquiv_symm_apply
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")]
alias _root_.AddAction.orbit_zmultiples_equiv_symm_apply := orbitZMultiplesEquiv_symm_apply
theorem orbitZPowersEquiv_symm_apply' (k : ℤ) :
(orbitZPowersEquiv a b).symm k =
(⟨a, mem_zpowers a⟩ : zpowers a) ^ k • ⟨b, mem_orbit_self b⟩ := by
rw [orbitZPowersEquiv_symm_apply, ZMod.coe_intCast]
exact Subtype.ext (zpow_smul_mod_minimalPeriod _ _ k)
#align mul_action.orbit_zpowers_equiv_symm_apply' MulAction.orbitZPowersEquiv_symm_apply'
theorem _root_.AddAction.orbitZMultiplesEquiv_symm_apply' {α β : Type*} [AddGroup α] (a : α)
[AddAction α β] (b : β) (k : ℤ) :
(AddAction.orbitZMultiplesEquiv a b).symm k =
k • (⟨a, mem_zmultiples a⟩ : zmultiples a) +ᵥ ⟨b, AddAction.mem_orbit_self b⟩ := by
rw [AddAction.orbitZMultiplesEquiv_symm_apply, ZMod.coe_intCast]
-- Porting note: times out without `a b` explicit
exact Subtype.ext (zsmul_vadd_mod_minimalPeriod a b k)
#align add_action.orbit_zmultiples_equiv_symm_apply' AddAction.orbitZMultiplesEquiv_symm_apply'
attribute [to_additive existing]
orbitZPowersEquiv_symm_apply'
@[to_additive]
theorem minimalPeriod_eq_card [Fintype (orbit (zpowers a) b)] :
minimalPeriod (a • ·) b = Fintype.card (orbit (zpowers a) b) := by
-- Porting note: added `(_)` to find `Fintype` by unification
rw [← Fintype.ofEquiv_card (orbitZPowersEquiv a b), @ZMod.card _ (_)]
#align mul_action.minimal_period_eq_card MulAction.minimalPeriod_eq_card
#align add_action.minimal_period_eq_card AddAction.minimalPeriod_eq_card
@[to_additive]
instance minimalPeriod_pos [Finite <| orbit (zpowers a) b] :
NeZero <| minimalPeriod (a • ·) b :=
⟨by
cases nonempty_fintype (orbit (zpowers a) b)
haveI : Nonempty (orbit (zpowers a) b) := (orbit_nonempty b).to_subtype
rw [minimalPeriod_eq_card]
exact Fintype.card_ne_zero⟩
#align mul_action.minimal_period_pos MulAction.minimalPeriod_pos
#align add_action.minimal_period_pos AddAction.minimalPeriod_pos
end MulAction
section Group
open Subgroup
variable {α : Type*} [Group α] (a : α)
/-- See also `Fintype.card_zpowers`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "See also `Fintype.card_zmultiples`."]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Quotient.lean | 209 | 211 | theorem Nat.card_zpowers : Nat.card (zpowers a) = orderOf a := by |
have := Nat.card_congr (MulAction.orbitZPowersEquiv a (1 : α))
rwa [Nat.card_zmod, orbit_subgroup_one_eq_self] at this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.TwoVariable
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Basic
#align_import number_theory.modular_forms.jacobi_theta.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57f9349f2fe19d2de7207e99b0341808d977cdcf"
/-! # Jacobi's theta function
This file defines the one-variable Jacobi theta function
$$\theta(\tau) = \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} \exp (i \pi n ^ 2 \tau),$$
and proves the modular transformation properties `θ (τ + 2) = θ τ` and
`θ (-1 / τ) = (-I * τ) ^ (1 / 2) * θ τ`, using Poisson's summation formula for the latter. We also
show that `θ` is differentiable on `ℍ`, and `θ(τ) - 1` has exponential decay as `im τ → ∞`.
-/
open Complex Real Asymptotics Filter Topology
open scoped Real UpperHalfPlane
/-- Jacobi's one-variable theta function `∑' (n : ℤ), exp (π * I * n ^ 2 * τ)`. -/
noncomputable def jacobiTheta (τ : ℂ) : ℂ := ∑' n : ℤ, cexp (π * I * (n : ℂ) ^ 2 * τ)
#align jacobi_theta jacobiTheta
lemma jacobiTheta_eq_jacobiTheta₂ (τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta τ = jacobiTheta₂ 0 τ :=
tsum_congr (by simp [jacobiTheta₂_term])
theorem jacobiTheta_two_add (τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta (2 + τ) = jacobiTheta τ := by
simp_rw [jacobiTheta_eq_jacobiTheta₂, add_comm, jacobiTheta₂_add_right]
#align jacobi_theta_two_add jacobiTheta_two_add
theorem jacobiTheta_T_sq_smul (τ : ℍ) : jacobiTheta (ModularGroup.T ^ 2 • τ :) = jacobiTheta τ := by
suffices (ModularGroup.T ^ 2 • τ :) = (2 : ℂ) + ↑τ by simp_rw [this, jacobiTheta_two_add]
have : ModularGroup.T ^ (2 : ℕ) = ModularGroup.T ^ (2 : ℤ) := rfl
simp_rw [this, UpperHalfPlane.modular_T_zpow_smul, UpperHalfPlane.coe_vadd]
norm_cast
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align jacobi_theta_T_sq_smul jacobiTheta_T_sq_smul
theorem jacobiTheta_S_smul (τ : ℍ) :
jacobiTheta ↑(ModularGroup.S • τ) = (-I * τ) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * jacobiTheta τ := by
have h0 : (τ : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ne_of_apply_ne im (zero_im.symm ▸ ne_of_gt τ.2)
have h1 : (-I * τ) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl <| mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero) h0
simp_rw [UpperHalfPlane.modular_S_smul, jacobiTheta_eq_jacobiTheta₂]
conv_rhs => erw [← ofReal_zero, jacobiTheta₂_functional_equation 0 τ]
rw [zero_pow two_ne_zero, mul_zero, zero_div, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, ← mul_assoc, mul_one_div,
div_self h1, one_mul, UpperHalfPlane.coe_mk, inv_neg, neg_div, one_div]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align jacobi_theta_S_smul jacobiTheta_S_smul
theorem norm_exp_mul_sq_le {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < τ.im) (n : ℤ) :
‖cexp (π * I * (n : ℂ) ^ 2 * τ)‖ ≤ rexp (-π * τ.im) ^ n.natAbs := by
let y := rexp (-π * τ.im)
have h : y < 1 := exp_lt_one_iff.mpr (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos (neg_lt_zero.mpr pi_pos) hτ)
refine (le_of_eq ?_).trans (?_ : y ^ n ^ 2 ≤ _)
· rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.abs_exp]
have : (π * I * n ^ 2 * τ : ℂ).re = -π * τ.im * (n : ℝ) ^ 2 := by
rw [(by push_cast; ring : (π * I * n ^ 2 * τ : ℂ) = (π * n ^ 2 : ℝ) * (τ * I)),
re_ofReal_mul, mul_I_re]
ring
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (sq_nonneg n)
rw [this, exp_mul, ← Int.cast_pow, rpow_intCast, hm, zpow_natCast]
· have : n ^ 2 = (n.natAbs ^ 2 :) := by rw [Nat.cast_pow, Int.natAbs_sq]
rw [this, zpow_natCast]
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one (exp_pos _).le h.le ((sq n.natAbs).symm ▸ n.natAbs.le_mul_self)
#align norm_exp_mul_sq_le norm_exp_mul_sq_le
theorem hasSum_nat_jacobiTheta {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => cexp (π * I * ((n : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2 * τ)) ((jacobiTheta τ - 1) / 2) := by
have := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term 0 hτ
simp_rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, mul_zero, zero_add, ← jacobiTheta_eq_jacobiTheta₂] at this
have := this.nat_add_neg
rw [← hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1] at this
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_one, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero,
Int.cast_zero, sq (0 : ℂ), mul_zero, zero_mul, neg_sq, ← mul_two,
Complex.exp_zero, add_sub_assoc, (by norm_num : (1 : ℂ) - 1 * 2 = -1), ← sub_eq_add_neg,
Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at this
convert this.div_const 2 using 1
simp_rw [mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
#align has_sum_nat_jacobi_theta hasSum_nat_jacobiTheta
theorem jacobiTheta_eq_tsum_nat {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
jacobiTheta τ = ↑1 + ↑2 * ∑' n : ℕ, cexp (π * I * ((n : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2 * τ) := by
rw [(hasSum_nat_jacobiTheta hτ).tsum_eq, mul_div_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ), ← add_sub_assoc,
add_sub_cancel_left]
#align jacobi_theta_eq_tsum_nat jacobiTheta_eq_tsum_nat
/-- An explicit upper bound for `‖jacobiTheta τ - 1‖`. -/
theorem norm_jacobiTheta_sub_one_le {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
‖jacobiTheta τ - 1‖ ≤ 2 / (1 - rexp (-π * τ.im)) * rexp (-π * τ.im) := by
suffices ‖∑' n : ℕ, cexp (π * I * ((n : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2 * τ)‖ ≤
rexp (-π * τ.im) / (1 - rexp (-π * τ.im)) by
calc
‖jacobiTheta τ - 1‖ = ↑2 * ‖∑' n : ℕ, cexp (π * I * ((n : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2 * τ)‖ := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add'.mpr (jacobiTheta_eq_tsum_nat hτ), norm_mul, Complex.norm_eq_abs,
Complex.abs_two]
_ ≤ 2 * (rexp (-π * τ.im) / (1 - rexp (-π * τ.im))) := by gcongr
_ = 2 / (1 - rexp (-π * τ.im)) * rexp (-π * τ.im) := by rw [div_mul_comm, mul_comm]
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖cexp (π * I * ((n : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2 * τ)‖ ≤ rexp (-π * τ.im) ^ (n + 1) := by
intro n
simpa only [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one] using norm_exp_mul_sq_le hτ (n + 1)
have s : HasSum (fun n : ℕ =>
rexp (-π * τ.im) ^ (n + 1)) (rexp (-π * τ.im) / (1 - rexp (-π * τ.im))) := by
simp_rw [pow_succ', div_eq_mul_inv, hasSum_mul_left_iff (Real.exp_ne_zero _)]
exact hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one (exp_pos (-π * τ.im)).le
(exp_lt_one_iff.mpr <| mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos (neg_lt_zero.mpr pi_pos) hτ)
have aux : Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖cexp (π * I * ((n : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2 * τ)‖ :=
.of_nonneg_of_le (fun n => norm_nonneg _) this s.summable
exact (norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm aux).trans ((tsum_mono aux s.summable this).trans_eq s.tsum_eq)
#align norm_jacobi_theta_sub_one_le norm_jacobiTheta_sub_one_le
/-- The norm of `jacobiTheta τ - 1` decays exponentially as `im τ → ∞`. -/
theorem isBigO_at_im_infty_jacobiTheta_sub_one :
(fun τ => jacobiTheta τ - 1) =O[comap im atTop] fun τ => rexp (-π * τ.im) := by
simp_rw [IsBigO, IsBigOWith, Filter.eventually_comap, Filter.eventually_atTop]
refine ⟨2 / (1 - rexp (-π)), 1, fun y hy τ hτ =>
(norm_jacobiTheta_sub_one_le (hτ.symm ▸ zero_lt_one.trans_le hy : 0 < im τ)).trans ?_⟩
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.abs_exp]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (exp_pos _).le
rw [div_le_div_left (zero_lt_two' ℝ), sub_le_sub_iff_left, exp_le_exp, neg_mul, neg_le_neg_iff]
· exact le_mul_of_one_le_right pi_pos.le (hτ.symm ▸ hy)
· rw [sub_pos, exp_lt_one_iff, neg_mul, neg_lt_zero]
exact mul_pos pi_pos (hτ.symm ▸ zero_lt_one.trans_le hy)
· rw [sub_pos, exp_lt_one_iff, neg_lt_zero]; exact pi_pos
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_O_at_im_infty_jacobi_theta_sub_one isBigO_at_im_infty_jacobiTheta_sub_one
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/JacobiTheta/OneVariable.lean | 135 | 138 | theorem differentiableAt_jacobiTheta {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ jacobiTheta τ := by |
simp_rw [funext jacobiTheta_eq_jacobiTheta₂]
exact differentiableAt_jacobiTheta₂_snd 0 hτ
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Fin
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.quotient_operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b88d81c84530450a8989e918608e5960f015e6c8"
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals related to quotients
## Main results:
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRange` : the **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings.
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRangeS` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism from a commutative ring to a semiring.
- `AlgHom.quotientKerEquivRange` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism of algebras (over a commutative semiring)
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRangeS` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism from a commutative ring to a semiring.
- `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient`: the **Chinese Remainder Theorem**, version for coprime
ideals (see also `ZMod.prodEquivPi` in `Data.ZMod.Quotient` for elementary versions about
`ZMod`).
-/
universe u v w
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`) /
is surjective (`quotientKerEquivOfSurjective`).
-/
def kerLift : R ⧸ ker f →+* S :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift _ f fun _ => f.mem_ker.mp
#align ring_hom.ker_lift RingHom.kerLift
@[simp]
theorem kerLift_mk (r : R) : kerLift f (Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) r) = f r :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
#align ring_hom.ker_lift_mk RingHom.kerLift_mk
theorem lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal (I : Ideal R) {f : R →+* S} (H : ∀ a : R, a ∈ I → f a = 0)
(hI : ker f ≤ I) : Function.Injective (Ideal.Quotient.lift I f H) := by
rw [RingHom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot, RingHom.ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero]
intro u hu
obtain ⟨v, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective u
rw [Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk] at hu
rw [Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact hI ((RingHom.mem_ker f).mpr hu)
#align ring_hom.lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal RingHom.lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
theorem kerLift_injective : Function.Injective (kerLift f) :=
lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal (ker f) (fun a => by simp only [mem_ker, imp_self]) le_rfl
#align ring_hom.ker_lift_injective RingHom.kerLift_injective
variable {f}
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem for commutative rings**, computable version. -/
def quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f) :
R ⧸ ker f ≃+* S :=
{ kerLift f with
toFun := kerLift f
invFun := Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) ∘ g
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply kerLift_injective
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk, kerLift_mk,
Function.comp_apply, hf (f x)]
right_inv := hf }
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse
@[simp]
theorem quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.apply {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f)
(x : R ⧸ ker f) : quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse hf x = kerLift f x :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.apply
@[simp]
theorem quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.Symm.apply {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f)
(x : S) : (quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse hf).symm x = Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) (g x) :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.symm.apply RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.Symm.apply
variable (R) in
/-- The quotient of a ring by he zero ideal is isomorphic to the ring itself. -/
def _root_.RingEquiv.quotientBot : R ⧸ (⊥ : Ideal R) ≃+* R :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq (RingHom.ker_coe_equiv <| .refl _).symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (f := .id R) (g := _root_.id) fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings, surjective case. -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : R ⧸ (ker f) ≃+* S :=
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (Classical.choose_spec hf.hasRightInverse)
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings (`RingHom.rangeS` version). -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRangeS (f : R →+* S) : R ⧸ ker f ≃+* f.rangeS :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq f.ker_rangeSRestrict.symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfSurjective f.rangeSRestrict_surjective
variable {S : Type v} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings (`RingHom.range` version). -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRange (f : R →+* S) : R ⧸ ker f ≃+* f.range :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq f.ker_rangeRestrict.symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfSurjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective
end RingHom
namespace Ideal
open Function RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {F : Type w} [CommRing R] [Semiring S]
@[simp]
theorem map_quotient_self (I : Ideal R) : map (Quotient.mk I) I = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <|
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun _ hx =>
(Submodule.mem_bot (R ⧸ I)).2 <| Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 hx
#align ideal.map_quotient_self Ideal.map_quotient_self
@[simp]
theorem mk_ker {I : Ideal R} : ker (Quotient.mk I) = I := by
ext
rw [ker, mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
#align ideal.mk_ker Ideal.mk_ker
theorem map_mk_eq_bot_of_le {I J : Ideal R} (h : I ≤ J) : I.map (Quotient.mk J) = ⊥ := by
rw [map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker, mk_ker]
exact h
#align ideal.map_mk_eq_bot_of_le Ideal.map_mk_eq_bot_of_le
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/QuotientOperations.lean | 141 | 156 | theorem ker_quotient_lift {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S)
(H : I ≤ ker f) :
ker (Ideal.Quotient.lift I f H) = f.ker.map (Quotient.mk I) := by |
apply Ideal.ext
intro x
constructor
· intro hx
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Quotient.mk_surjective x
rw [mem_ker, ← hy, Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk, ← mem_ker] at hx
rw [← hy, mem_map_iff_of_surjective (Quotient.mk I) Quotient.mk_surjective]
exact ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩
· intro hx
rw [mem_map_iff_of_surjective (Quotient.mk I) Quotient.mk_surjective] at hx
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
rw [mem_ker, ← hy.right, Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk]
exact hy.left
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jannis Limperg. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jannis Limperg
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
#align_import data.list.indexes from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# Lemmas about List.*Idx functions.
Some specification lemmas for `List.mapIdx`, `List.mapIdxM`, `List.foldlIdx` and `List.foldrIdx`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v
open Function
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section MapIdx
-- Porting note: Add back old definition because it's easier for writing proofs.
/-- Lean3 `map_with_index` helper function -/
protected def oldMapIdxCore (f : ℕ → α → β) : ℕ → List α → List β
| _, [] => []
| k, a :: as => f k a :: List.oldMapIdxCore f (k + 1) as
/-- Given a function `f : ℕ → α → β` and `as : List α`, `as = [a₀, a₁, ...]`, returns the list
`[f 0 a₀, f 1 a₁, ...]`. -/
protected def oldMapIdx (f : ℕ → α → β) (as : List α) : List β :=
List.oldMapIdxCore f 0 as
@[simp]
theorem mapIdx_nil {α β} (f : ℕ → α → β) : mapIdx f [] = [] :=
rfl
#align list.map_with_index_nil List.mapIdx_nil
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
protected theorem oldMapIdxCore_eq (l : List α) (f : ℕ → α → β) (n : ℕ) :
l.oldMapIdxCore f n = l.oldMapIdx fun i a ↦ f (i + n) a := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing f n
· rfl
· rw [List.oldMapIdx]
simp only [List.oldMapIdxCore, hl, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_zero]
#noalign list.map_with_index_core_eq
-- Porting note: convert new definition to old definition.
-- A few new theorems are added to achieve this
-- 1. Prove that `oldMapIdxCore f (l ++ [e]) = oldMapIdxCore f l ++ [f l.length e]`
-- 2. Prove that `oldMapIdx f (l ++ [e]) = oldMapIdx f l ++ [f l.length e]`
-- 3. Prove list induction using `∀ l e, p [] → (p l → p (l ++ [e])) → p l`
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
theorem list_reverse_induction (p : List α → Prop) (base : p [])
(ind : ∀ (l : List α) (e : α), p l → p (l ++ [e])) : (∀ (l : List α), p l) := by
let q := fun l ↦ p (reverse l)
have pq : ∀ l, p (reverse l) → q l := by simp only [q, reverse_reverse]; intro; exact id
have qp : ∀ l, q (reverse l) → p l := by simp only [q, reverse_reverse]; intro; exact id
intro l
apply qp
generalize (reverse l) = l
induction' l with head tail ih
· apply pq; simp only [reverse_nil, base]
· apply pq; simp only [reverse_cons]; apply ind; apply qp; rw [reverse_reverse]; exact ih
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
protected theorem oldMapIdxCore_append : ∀ (f : ℕ → α → β) (n : ℕ) (l₁ l₂ : List α),
List.oldMapIdxCore f n (l₁ ++ l₂) =
List.oldMapIdxCore f n l₁ ++ List.oldMapIdxCore f (n + l₁.length) l₂ := by
intros f n l₁ l₂
generalize e : (l₁ ++ l₂).length = len
revert n l₁ l₂
induction' len with len ih <;> intros n l₁ l₂ h
· have l₁_nil : l₁ = [] := by
cases l₁
· rfl
· contradiction
have l₂_nil : l₂ = [] := by
cases l₂
· rfl
· rw [List.length_append] at h; contradiction
simp only [l₁_nil, l₂_nil]; rfl
· cases' l₁ with head tail
· rfl
· simp only [List.oldMapIdxCore, List.append_eq, length_cons, cons_append,cons.injEq, true_and]
suffices n + Nat.succ (length tail) = n + 1 + tail.length by
rw [this]
apply ih (n + 1) _ _ _
simp only [cons_append, length_cons, length_append, Nat.succ.injEq] at h
simp only [length_append, h]
rw [Nat.add_assoc]; simp only [Nat.add_comm]
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
protected theorem oldMapIdx_append : ∀ (f : ℕ → α → β) (l : List α) (e : α),
List.oldMapIdx f (l ++ [e]) = List.oldMapIdx f l ++ [f l.length e] := by
intros f l e
unfold List.oldMapIdx
rw [List.oldMapIdxCore_append f 0 l [e]]
simp only [Nat.zero_add]; rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
theorem mapIdxGo_append : ∀ (f : ℕ → α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) (arr : Array β),
mapIdx.go f (l₁ ++ l₂) arr = mapIdx.go f l₂ (List.toArray (mapIdx.go f l₁ arr)) := by
intros f l₁ l₂ arr
generalize e : (l₁ ++ l₂).length = len
revert l₁ l₂ arr
induction' len with len ih <;> intros l₁ l₂ arr h
· have l₁_nil : l₁ = [] := by
cases l₁
· rfl
· contradiction
have l₂_nil : l₂ = [] := by
cases l₂
· rfl
· rw [List.length_append] at h; contradiction
rw [l₁_nil, l₂_nil]; simp only [mapIdx.go, Array.toList_eq, Array.toArray_data]
· cases' l₁ with head tail <;> simp only [mapIdx.go]
· simp only [nil_append, Array.toList_eq, Array.toArray_data]
· simp only [List.append_eq]
rw [ih]
· simp only [cons_append, length_cons, length_append, Nat.succ.injEq] at h
simp only [length_append, h]
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
theorem mapIdxGo_length : ∀ (f : ℕ → α → β) (l : List α) (arr : Array β),
length (mapIdx.go f l arr) = length l + arr.size := by
intro f l
induction' l with head tail ih
· intro; simp only [mapIdx.go, Array.toList_eq, length_nil, Nat.zero_add]
· intro; simp only [mapIdx.go]; rw [ih]; simp only [Array.size_push, length_cons];
simp only [Nat.add_succ, add_zero, Nat.add_comm]
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
theorem mapIdx_append_one : ∀ (f : ℕ → α → β) (l : List α) (e : α),
mapIdx f (l ++ [e]) = mapIdx f l ++ [f l.length e] := by
intros f l e
unfold mapIdx
rw [mapIdxGo_append f l [e]]
simp only [mapIdx.go, Array.size_toArray, mapIdxGo_length, length_nil, Nat.add_zero,
Array.toList_eq, Array.push_data, Array.data_toArray]
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
protected theorem new_def_eq_old_def :
∀ (f : ℕ → α → β) (l : List α), l.mapIdx f = List.oldMapIdx f l := by
intro f
apply list_reverse_induction
· rfl
· intro l e h
rw [List.oldMapIdx_append, mapIdx_append_one, h]
@[local simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Indexes.lean | 159 | 180 | theorem map_enumFrom_eq_zipWith : ∀ (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → α → β),
map (uncurry f) (enumFrom n l) = zipWith (fun i ↦ f (i + n)) (range (length l)) l := by |
intro l
generalize e : l.length = len
revert l
induction' len with len ih <;> intros l e n f
· have : l = [] := by
cases l
· rfl
· contradiction
rw [this]; rfl
· cases' l with head tail
· contradiction
· simp only [map, uncurry_apply_pair, range_succ_eq_map, zipWith, Nat.zero_add,
zipWith_map_left]
rw [ih]
· suffices (fun i ↦ f (i + (n + 1))) = ((fun i ↦ f (i + n)) ∘ Nat.succ) by
rw [this]
rfl
funext n' a
simp only [comp, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_succ]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ.injEq] at e; exact e
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.integral.interval_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Integral over an interval
In this file we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ` if `a ≤ b` and
`-∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ` if `b ≤ a`.
## Implementation notes
### Avoiding `if`, `min`, and `max`
In order to avoid `if`s in the definition, we define `IntervalIntegrable f μ a b` as
`integrable_on f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ integrable_on f (Ioc b a) μ`. For any `a`, `b` one of these
intervals is empty and the other coincides with `Set.uIoc a b = Set.Ioc (min a b) (max a b)`.
Similarly, we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`.
Again, for any `a`, `b` one of these integrals is zero, and the other gives the expected result.
This way some properties can be translated from integrals over sets without dealing with
the cases `a ≤ b` and `b ≤ a` separately.
### Choice of the interval
We use integral over `Set.uIoc a b = Set.Ioc (min a b) (max a b)` instead of one of the other
three possible intervals with the same endpoints for two reasons:
* this way `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ` holds whenever
`f` is integrable on each interval; in particular, it works even if the measure `μ` has an atom
at `b`; this rules out `Set.Ioo` and `Set.Icc` intervals;
* with this definition for a probability measure `μ`, the integral `∫ x in a..b, 1 ∂μ` equals
the difference $F_μ(b)-F_μ(a)$, where $F_μ(a)=μ(-∞, a]$ is the
[cumulative distribution function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_function)
of `μ`.
## Tags
integral
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory Set Filter Function
open scoped Classical Topology Filter ENNReal Interval NNReal
variable {ι 𝕜 E F A : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-!
### Integrability on an interval
-/
/-- A function `f` is called *interval integrable* with respect to a measure `μ` on an unordered
interval `a..b` if it is integrable on both intervals `(a, b]` and `(b, a]`. One of these
intervals is always empty, so this property is equivalent to `f` being integrable on
`(min a b, max a b]`. -/
def IntervalIntegrable (f : ℝ → E) (μ : Measure ℝ) (a b : ℝ) : Prop :=
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ IntegrableOn f (Ioc b a) μ
#align interval_integrable IntervalIntegrable
/-!
## Basic iff's for `IntervalIntegrable`
-/
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
/-- A function is interval integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` on `a..b` if and
only if it is integrable on `uIoc a b` with respect to `μ`. This is an equivalent
definition of `IntervalIntegrable`. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ := by
rw [uIoc_eq_union, integrableOn_union, IntervalIntegrable]
#align interval_integrable_iff intervalIntegrable_iff
/-- If a function is interval integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` on `a..b` then
it is integrable on `uIoc a b` with respect to `μ`. -/
theorem IntervalIntegrable.def' (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.mp h
#align interval_integrable.def IntervalIntegrable.def'
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc_of_le hab]
#align interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Ioc_of_le intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff' [NoAtoms μ] :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (uIcc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, ← Icc_min_max, uIoc, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
#align interval_integrable_iff' intervalIntegrable_iff'
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b)
{μ : Measure ℝ} [NoAtoms μ] : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
#align interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Icc_of_le intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ico_of_le [NoAtoms μ] (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico]
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le [NoAtoms μ] (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo]
/-- If a function is integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` then it is interval integrable
with respect to `μ` on `uIcc a b`. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.Integrable.intervalIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
⟨hf.integrableOn, hf.integrableOn⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.interval_integrable MeasureTheory.Integrable.intervalIntegrable
theorem MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.intervalIntegrable (hf : IntegrableOn f [[a, b]] μ) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
⟨MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.mono_set hf (Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_uIcc),
MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.mono_set hf (Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_uIcc')⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_on.interval_integrable MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem intervalIntegrable_const_iff {c : E} :
IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ a b ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ (Ι a b) < ∞ := by
simp only [intervalIntegrable_iff, integrableOn_const]
#align interval_integrable_const_iff intervalIntegrable_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {c : E} :
IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ a b :=
intervalIntegrable_const_iff.2 <| Or.inr measure_Ioc_lt_top
#align interval_integrable_const intervalIntegrable_const
end
/-!
## Basic properties of interval integrability
- interval integrability is symmetric, reflexive, transitive
- monotonicity and strong measurability of the interval integral
- if `f` is interval integrable, so are its absolute value and norm
- arithmetic properties
-/
namespace IntervalIntegrable
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b c d : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure ℝ}
@[symm]
nonrec theorem symm (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable f μ b a :=
h.symm
#align interval_integrable.symm IntervalIntegrable.symm
@[refl, simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem refl : IntervalIntegrable f μ a a := by constructor <;> simp
#align interval_integrable.refl IntervalIntegrable.refl
@[trans]
theorem trans {a b c : ℝ} (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hbc : IntervalIntegrable f μ b c) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a c :=
⟨(hab.1.union hbc.1).mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioc_union_Ioc,
(hbc.2.union hab.2).mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioc_union_Ioc⟩
#align interval_integrable.trans IntervalIntegrable.trans
theorem trans_iterate_Ico {a : ℕ → ℝ} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(hint : ∀ k ∈ Ico m n, IntervalIntegrable f μ (a k) (a <| k + 1)) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ (a m) (a n) := by
revert hint
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n hmn
· simp
· intro p hp IH h
exact (IH fun k hk => h k (Ico_subset_Ico_right p.le_succ hk)).trans (h p (by simp [hp]))
#align interval_integrable.trans_iterate_Ico IntervalIntegrable.trans_iterate_Ico
theorem trans_iterate {a : ℕ → ℝ} {n : ℕ}
(hint : ∀ k < n, IntervalIntegrable f μ (a k) (a <| k + 1)) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ (a 0) (a n) :=
trans_iterate_Ico bot_le fun k hk => hint k hk.2
#align interval_integrable.trans_iterate IntervalIntegrable.trans_iterate
theorem neg (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable (-f) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.neg, h.2.neg⟩
#align interval_integrable.neg IntervalIntegrable.neg
theorem norm (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => ‖f x‖) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.norm, h.2.norm⟩
#align interval_integrable.norm IntervalIntegrable.norm
theorem intervalIntegrable_norm_iff {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ι a b))) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun t => ‖f t‖) μ a b ↔ IntervalIntegrable f μ a b := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, IntegrableOn]; exact integrable_norm_iff hf
#align interval_integrable.interval_integrable_norm_iff IntervalIntegrable.intervalIntegrable_norm_iff
theorem abs {f : ℝ → ℝ} (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => |f x|) μ a b :=
h.norm
#align interval_integrable.abs IntervalIntegrable.abs
theorem mono (hf : IntervalIntegrable f ν a b) (h1 : [[c, d]] ⊆ [[a, b]]) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ c d :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.mpr <| hf.def'.mono (uIoc_subset_uIoc_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc h1) h2
#align interval_integrable.mono IntervalIntegrable.mono
theorem mono_measure (hf : IntervalIntegrable f ν a b) (h : μ ≤ ν) : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
hf.mono Subset.rfl h
#align interval_integrable.mono_measure IntervalIntegrable.mono_measure
theorem mono_set (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (h : [[c, d]] ⊆ [[a, b]]) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ c d :=
hf.mono h le_rfl
#align interval_integrable.mono_set IntervalIntegrable.mono_set
theorem mono_set_ae (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (h : Ι c d ≤ᵐ[μ] Ι a b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ c d :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.mpr <| hf.def'.mono_set_ae h
#align interval_integrable.mono_set_ae IntervalIntegrable.mono_set_ae
theorem mono_set' (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hsub : Ι c d ⊆ Ι a b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ c d :=
hf.mono_set_ae <| eventually_of_forall hsub
#align interval_integrable.mono_set' IntervalIntegrable.mono_set'
theorem mono_fun [NormedAddCommGroup F] {g : ℝ → F} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable g (μ.restrict (Ι a b)))
(hle : (fun x => ‖g x‖) ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ι a b)] fun x => ‖f x‖) : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.2 <| hf.def'.integrable.mono hgm hle
#align interval_integrable.mono_fun IntervalIntegrable.mono_fun
theorem mono_fun' {g : ℝ → ℝ} (hg : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ι a b)))
(hle : (fun x => ‖f x‖) ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ι a b)] g) : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.2 <| hg.def'.integrable.mono' hfm hle
#align interval_integrable.mono_fun' IntervalIntegrable.mono_fun'
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ioc a b)) :=
h.1.aestronglyMeasurable
#align interval_integrable.ae_strongly_measurable IntervalIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable' (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ioc b a)) :=
h.2.aestronglyMeasurable
#align interval_integrable.ae_strongly_measurable' IntervalIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable'
end
variable [NormedRing A] {f g : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
theorem smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
(h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (r : 𝕜) : IntervalIntegrable (r • f) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.smul r, h.2.smul r⟩
#align interval_integrable.smul IntervalIntegrable.smul
@[simp]
theorem add (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hg : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x + g x) μ a b :=
⟨hf.1.add hg.1, hf.2.add hg.2⟩
#align interval_integrable.add IntervalIntegrable.add
@[simp]
theorem sub (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hg : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x - g x) μ a b :=
⟨hf.1.sub hg.1, hf.2.sub hg.2⟩
#align interval_integrable.sub IntervalIntegrable.sub
theorem sum (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → ℝ → E} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IntervalIntegrable (f i) μ a b) :
IntervalIntegrable (∑ i ∈ s, f i) μ a b :=
⟨integrable_finset_sum' s fun i hi => (h i hi).1, integrable_finset_sum' s fun i hi => (h i hi).2⟩
#align interval_integrable.sum IntervalIntegrable.sum
theorem mul_continuousOn {f g : ℝ → A} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hg : ContinuousOn g [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x * g x) μ a b := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mul_continuousOn_of_subset hg measurableSet_Ioc isCompact_uIcc Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align interval_integrable.mul_continuous_on IntervalIntegrable.mul_continuousOn
theorem continuousOn_mul {f g : ℝ → A} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hg : ContinuousOn g [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => g x * f x) μ a b := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff] at hf ⊢
exact hf.continuousOn_mul_of_subset hg isCompact_uIcc measurableSet_Ioc Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align interval_integrable.continuous_on_mul IntervalIntegrable.continuousOn_mul
@[simp]
theorem const_mul {f : ℝ → A} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (c : A) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => c * f x) μ a b :=
hf.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_const
#align interval_integrable.const_mul IntervalIntegrable.const_mul
@[simp]
theorem mul_const {f : ℝ → A} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (c : A) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x * c) μ a b :=
hf.mul_continuousOn continuousOn_const
#align interval_integrable.mul_const IntervalIntegrable.mul_const
@[simp]
theorem div_const {𝕜 : Type*} {f : ℝ → 𝕜} [NormedField 𝕜] (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(c : 𝕜) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x / c) μ a b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_const h c⁻¹
#align interval_integrable.div_const IntervalIntegrable.div_const
theorem comp_mul_left (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (c * x)) volume (a / c) (b / c) := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (hc | hc); · rw [hc]; simp
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff'] at hf ⊢
have A : MeasurableEmbedding fun x => x * c⁻¹ :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight₀ _ (inv_ne_zero hc)).closedEmbedding.measurableEmbedding
rw [← Real.smul_map_volume_mul_right (inv_ne_zero hc), IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_smul,
integrable_smul_measure (by simpa : ENNReal.ofReal |c⁻¹| ≠ 0) ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top,
← IntegrableOn, MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_map_iff A]
convert hf using 1
· ext; simp only [comp_apply]; congr 1; field_simp
· rw [preimage_mul_const_uIcc (inv_ne_zero hc)]; field_simp [hc]
#align interval_integrable.comp_mul_left IntervalIntegrable.comp_mul_left
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem comp_mul_left_iff {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x ↦ f (c * x)) volume (a / c) (b / c) ↔
IntervalIntegrable f volume a b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa [hc] using h.comp_mul_left c⁻¹, (comp_mul_left · c)⟩
theorem comp_mul_right (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (x * c)) volume (a / c) (b / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using comp_mul_left hf c
#align interval_integrable.comp_mul_right IntervalIntegrable.comp_mul_right
theorem comp_add_right (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (x + c)) volume (a - c) (b - c) := by
wlog h : a ≤ b generalizing a b
· exact IntervalIntegrable.symm (this hf.symm (le_of_not_le h))
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff'] at hf ⊢
have A : MeasurableEmbedding fun x => x + c :=
(Homeomorph.addRight c).closedEmbedding.measurableEmbedding
rw [← map_add_right_eq_self volume c] at hf
convert (MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_map_iff A).mp hf using 1
rw [preimage_add_const_uIcc]
#align interval_integrable.comp_add_right IntervalIntegrable.comp_add_right
theorem comp_add_left (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (c + x)) volume (a - c) (b - c) := by
simpa only [add_comm] using IntervalIntegrable.comp_add_right hf c
#align interval_integrable.comp_add_left IntervalIntegrable.comp_add_left
theorem comp_sub_right (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (x - c)) volume (a + c) (b + c) := by
simpa only [sub_neg_eq_add] using IntervalIntegrable.comp_add_right hf (-c)
#align interval_integrable.comp_sub_right IntervalIntegrable.comp_sub_right
theorem iff_comp_neg :
IntervalIntegrable f volume a b ↔ IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (-x)) volume (-a) (-b) := by
rw [← comp_mul_left_iff (neg_ne_zero.2 one_ne_zero)]; simp [div_neg]
#align interval_integrable.iff_comp_neg IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg
theorem comp_sub_left (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (c - x)) volume (c - a) (c - b) := by
simpa only [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_add_neg] using iff_comp_neg.mp (hf.comp_add_left c)
#align interval_integrable.comp_sub_left IntervalIntegrable.comp_sub_left
end IntervalIntegrable
/-!
## Continuous functions are interval integrable
-/
section
variable {μ : Measure ℝ} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
theorem ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : ContinuousOn u (uIcc a b)) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
(ContinuousOn.integrableOn_Icc hu).intervalIntegrable
#align continuous_on.interval_integrable ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable_of_Icc {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b)
(hu : ContinuousOn u (Icc a b)) : IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable ((uIcc_of_le h).symm ▸ hu)
#align continuous_on.interval_integrable_of_Icc ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable_of_Icc
/-- A continuous function on `ℝ` is `IntervalIntegrable` with respect to any locally finite measure
`ν` on ℝ. -/
theorem Continuous.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} (hu : Continuous u) (a b : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
hu.continuousOn.intervalIntegrable
#align continuous.interval_integrable Continuous.intervalIntegrable
end
/-!
## Monotone and antitone functions are integral integrable
-/
section
variable {μ : Measure ℝ} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder E]
[OrderTopology E] [SecondCountableTopology E]
theorem MonotoneOn.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : MonotoneOn u (uIcc a b)) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff]
exact (hu.integrableOn_isCompact isCompact_uIcc).mono_set Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align monotone_on.interval_integrable MonotoneOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem AntitoneOn.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : AntitoneOn u (uIcc a b)) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
hu.dual_right.intervalIntegrable
#align antitone_on.interval_integrable AntitoneOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem Monotone.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : Monotone u) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
(hu.monotoneOn _).intervalIntegrable
#align monotone.interval_integrable Monotone.intervalIntegrable
theorem Antitone.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : Antitone u) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
(hu.antitoneOn _).intervalIntegrable
#align antitone.interval_integrable Antitone.intervalIntegrable
end
/-- Let `l'` be a measurably generated filter; let `l` be a of filter such that each `s ∈ l'`
eventually includes `Ioc u v` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`. Let `μ` be a measure finite at `l'`.
Suppose that `f : ℝ → E` has a finite limit at `l' ⊓ ae μ`. Then `f` is interval integrable on
`u..v` provided that both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
Typeclass instances allow Lean to find `l'` based on `l` but not vice versa, so
`apply Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable_ae` will generate goals `Filter ℝ` and
`TendstoIxxClass Ioc ?m_1 l'`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable_ae {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ}
{l l' : Filter ℝ} (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l' μ) [TendstoIxxClass Ioc l l']
[IsMeasurablyGenerated l'] (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l') {c : E} (hf : Tendsto f (l' ⊓ ae μ) (𝓝 c))
{u v : ι → ℝ} {lt : Filter ι} (hu : Tendsto u lt l) (hv : Tendsto v lt l) :
∀ᶠ t in lt, IntervalIntegrable f μ (u t) (v t) :=
have := (hf.integrableAtFilter_ae hfm hμ).eventually
((hu.Ioc hv).eventually this).and <| (hv.Ioc hu).eventually this
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_interval_integrable_ae Filter.Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable_ae
/-- Let `l'` be a measurably generated filter; let `l` be a of filter such that each `s ∈ l'`
eventually includes `Ioc u v` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`. Let `μ` be a measure finite at `l'`.
Suppose that `f : ℝ → E` has a finite limit at `l`. Then `f` is interval integrable on `u..v`
provided that both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
Typeclass instances allow Lean to find `l'` based on `l` but not vice versa, so
`apply Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable` will generate goals `Filter ℝ` and
`TendstoIxxClass Ioc ?m_1 l'`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ} {l l' : Filter ℝ}
(hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l' μ) [TendstoIxxClass Ioc l l'] [IsMeasurablyGenerated l']
(hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l') {c : E} (hf : Tendsto f l' (𝓝 c)) {u v : ι → ℝ} {lt : Filter ι}
(hu : Tendsto u lt l) (hv : Tendsto v lt l) : ∀ᶠ t in lt, IntervalIntegrable f μ (u t) (v t) :=
(hf.mono_left inf_le_left).eventually_intervalIntegrable_ae hfm hμ hu hv
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_interval_integrable Filter.Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable
/-!
### Interval integral: definition and basic properties
In this section we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` as `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`
and prove some basic properties.
-/
variable [CompleteSpace E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- The interval integral `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` is defined
as `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`. If `a ≤ b`, then it equals
`∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ`, otherwise it equals `-∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`. -/
def intervalIntegral (f : ℝ → E) (a b : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ) : E :=
(∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ
#align interval_integral intervalIntegral
notation3"∫ "(...)" in "a".."b", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => intervalIntegral r a b μ
notation3"∫ "(...)" in "a".."b", "r:60:(scoped f => intervalIntegral f a b volume) => r
namespace intervalIntegral
section Basic
variable {a b : ℝ} {f g : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : (∫ _ in a..b, (0 : E) ∂μ) = 0 := by simp [intervalIntegral]
#align interval_integral.integral_zero intervalIntegral.integral_zero
theorem integral_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ := by
simp [intervalIntegral, h]
#align interval_integral.integral_of_le intervalIntegral.integral_of_le
@[simp]
theorem integral_same : ∫ x in a..a, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
sub_self _
#align interval_integral.integral_same intervalIntegral.integral_same
theorem integral_symm (a b) : ∫ x in b..a, f x ∂μ = -∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [intervalIntegral, neg_sub]
#align interval_integral.integral_symm intervalIntegral.integral_symm
theorem integral_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = -∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [integral_symm b, integral_of_le h]
#align interval_integral.integral_of_ge intervalIntegral.integral_of_ge
theorem intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc (f : ℝ → E) (a b : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = (if a ≤ b then 1 else -1 : ℝ) • ∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ := by
split_ifs with h
· simp only [integral_of_le h, uIoc_of_le h, one_smul]
· simp only [integral_of_ge (not_le.1 h).le, uIoc_of_lt (not_le.1 h), neg_one_smul]
#align interval_integral.interval_integral_eq_integral_uIoc intervalIntegral.intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc
theorem norm_intervalIntegral_eq (f : ℝ → E) (a b : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ) :
‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ = ‖∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ‖ := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, norm_smul]
split_ifs <;> simp only [norm_neg, norm_one, one_mul]
#align interval_integral.norm_interval_integral_eq intervalIntegral.norm_intervalIntegral_eq
theorem abs_intervalIntegral_eq (f : ℝ → ℝ) (a b : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ) :
|∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ| = |∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ| :=
norm_intervalIntegral_eq f a b μ
#align interval_integral.abs_interval_integral_eq intervalIntegral.abs_intervalIntegral_eq
theorem integral_cases (f : ℝ → E) (a b) :
(∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) ∈ ({∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ, -∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ} : Set E) := by
rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc]; split_ifs <;> simp
#align interval_integral.integral_cases intervalIntegral.integral_cases
nonrec theorem integral_undef (h : ¬IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff] at h
rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, integral_undef h, smul_zero]
#align interval_integral.integral_undef intervalIntegral.integral_undef
theorem intervalIntegrable_of_integral_ne_zero {a b : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ}
(h : (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) ≠ 0) : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
not_imp_comm.1 integral_undef h
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_of_integral_ne_zero intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_of_integral_ne_zero
nonrec theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ι a b))) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable hf, smul_zero]
#align interval_integral.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable intervalIntegral.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable_of_le (h : a ≤ b)
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ioc a b))) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable <| by rwa [uIoc_of_le h]
#align interval_integral.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable_of_le intervalIntegral.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable_of_le
theorem norm_integral_min_max (f : ℝ → E) :
‖∫ x in min a b..max a b, f x ∂μ‖ = ‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ := by
cases le_total a b <;> simp [*, integral_symm a b]
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_min_max intervalIntegral.norm_integral_min_max
theorem norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc (f : ℝ → E) :
‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ = ‖∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ‖ := by
rw [← norm_integral_min_max, integral_of_le min_le_max, uIoc]
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc intervalIntegral.norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc
theorem abs_integral_eq_abs_integral_uIoc (f : ℝ → ℝ) :
|∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ| = |∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ| :=
norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc f
#align interval_integral.abs_integral_eq_abs_integral_uIoc intervalIntegral.abs_integral_eq_abs_integral_uIoc
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm_Ioc : ‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x in Ι a b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ :=
calc
‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ = ‖∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ‖ := norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc f
_ ≤ ∫ x in Ι a b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm f
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm_Ioc intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm_Ioc
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 570 | 572 | theorem norm_integral_le_abs_integral_norm : ‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ |∫ x in a..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ| := by |
simp only [← Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc]
exact le_trans (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _) (le_abs_self _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
#align_import logic.equiv.fintype from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9407b03373c8cd201df99d6bc5514fc2db44054f"
/-! # Equivalence between fintypes
This file contains some basic results on equivalences where one or both
sides of the equivalence are `Fintype`s.
# Main definitions
- `Function.Embedding.toEquivRange`: computably turn an embedding of a
fintype into an `Equiv` of the domain to its range
- `Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding : Perm α → (α ↪ β) → Perm β` extends the domain of
a permutation, fixing everything outside the range of the embedding
# Implementation details
- `Function.Embedding.toEquivRange` uses a computable inverse, but one that has poor
computational performance, since it operates by exhaustive search over the input `Fintype`s.
-/
section Fintype
variable {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq β] (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : α ↪ β)
/-- Computably turn an embedding `f : α ↪ β` into an equiv `α ≃ Set.range f`,
if `α` is a `Fintype`. Has poor computational performance, due to exhaustive searching in
constructed inverse. When a better inverse is known, use `Equiv.ofLeftInverse'` or
`Equiv.ofLeftInverse` instead. This is the computable version of `Equiv.ofInjective`.
-/
def Function.Embedding.toEquivRange : α ≃ Set.range f :=
⟨fun a => ⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩, f.invOfMemRange, fun _ => by simp, fun _ => by simp⟩
#align function.embedding.to_equiv_range Function.Embedding.toEquivRange
@[simp]
theorem Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_apply (a : α) :
f.toEquivRange a = ⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩ :=
rfl
#align function.embedding.to_equiv_range_apply Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_apply
@[simp]
theorem Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_symm_apply_self (a : α) :
f.toEquivRange.symm ⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩ = a := by simp [Equiv.symm_apply_eq]
#align function.embedding.to_equiv_range_symm_apply_self Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_symm_apply_self
theorem Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_eq_ofInjective :
f.toEquivRange = Equiv.ofInjective f f.injective := by
ext
simp
#align function.embedding.to_equiv_range_eq_of_injective Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_eq_ofInjective
/-- Extend the domain of `e : Equiv.Perm α`, mapping it through `f : α ↪ β`.
Everything outside of `Set.range f` is kept fixed. Has poor computational performance,
due to exhaustive searching in constructed inverse due to using `Function.Embedding.toEquivRange`.
When a better `α ≃ Set.range f` is known, use `Equiv.Perm.viaSetRange`.
When `[Fintype α]` is not available, a noncomputable version is available as
`Equiv.Perm.viaEmbedding`.
-/
def Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding : Equiv.Perm β :=
e.extendDomain f.toEquivRange
#align equiv.perm.via_fintype_embedding Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_image (a : α) :
e.viaFintypeEmbedding f (f a) = f (e a) := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding]
convert Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_image e (Function.Embedding.toEquivRange f) a
#align equiv.perm.via_fintype_embedding_apply_image Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_image
theorem Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_mem_range {b : β} (h : b ∈ Set.range f) :
e.viaFintypeEmbedding f b = f (e (f.invOfMemRange ⟨b, h⟩)) := by
simp only [viaFintypeEmbedding, Function.Embedding.invOfMemRange]
rw [Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype]
congr
#align equiv.perm.via_fintype_embedding_apply_mem_range Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_mem_range
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Fintype.lean | 85 | 87 | theorem Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_not_mem_range {b : β} (h : b ∉ Set.range f) :
e.viaFintypeEmbedding f b = b := by |
rwa [Equiv.Perm.viaFintypeEmbedding, Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
#align_import topology.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e354e865255654389cc46e6032160238df2e0f40"
/-!
# Basic theory of topological spaces.
The main definition is the type class `TopologicalSpace X` which endows a type `X` with a topology.
Then `Set X` gets predicates `IsOpen`, `IsClosed` and functions `interior`, `closure` and
`frontier`. Each point `x` of `X` gets a neighborhood filter `𝓝 x`. A filter `F` on `X` has
`x` as a cluster point if `ClusterPt x F : 𝓝 x ⊓ F ≠ ⊥`. A map `f : α → X` clusters at `x`
along `F : Filter α` if `MapClusterPt x F f : ClusterPt x (map f F)`. In particular
the notion of cluster point of a sequence `u` is `MapClusterPt x atTop u`.
For topological spaces `X` and `Y`, a function `f : X → Y` and a point `x : X`,
`ContinuousAt f x` means `f` is continuous at `x`, and global continuity is
`Continuous f`. There is also a version of continuity `PContinuous` for
partially defined functions.
## Notation
The following notation is introduced elsewhere and it heavily used in this file.
* `𝓝 x`: the filter `nhds x` of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`;
* `𝓝[≠] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x {x}ᶜ` of punctured neighborhoods of `x`.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space, interior, closure, frontier, neighborhood, continuity, continuous function
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter
universe u v w x
/-!
### Topological spaces
-/
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
#align topological_space.of_closed TopologicalSpace.ofClosed
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*}
{x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
open Topology
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
#align is_open_mk isOpen_mk
@[ext]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align topological_space_eq TopologicalSpace.ext
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
end
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h s => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
#align topological_space_eq_iff TopologicalSpace.ext_iff
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
#align is_open_fold isOpen_fold
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Union isOpen_iUnion
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
#align is_open_bUnion isOpen_biUnion
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
#align is_open.union IsOpen.union
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
#align is_open_empty isOpen_empty
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) :
(∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) → IsOpen (⋂₀ s) :=
Finite.induction_on hs (fun _ => by rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ) fun _ _ ih h => by
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
#align is_open_sInter Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
#align is_open_bInter Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Inter isOpen_iInter_of_finite
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_open_bInter_finset isOpen_biInter_finset
@[simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align is_open_const isOpen_const
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
#align is_open.and IsOpen.and
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
#align is_open_compl_iff isOpen_compl_iff
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_empty isClosed_empty
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_univ isClosed_univ
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
#align is_closed.union IsClosed.union
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
#align is_closed_sInter isClosed_sInter
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align is_closed_Inter isClosed_iInter
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
#align is_closed_bInter isClosed_biInter
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
#align is_closed_compl_iff isClosed_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
#align is_open.is_closed_compl IsOpen.isClosed_compl
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
#align is_open.sdiff IsOpen.sdiff
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
#align is_closed.inter IsClosed.inter
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
#align is_closed.sdiff IsClosed.sdiff
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_closed_bUnion Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
#align is_closed_Union isClosed_iUnion_of_finite
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
#align is_closed_imp isClosed_imp
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
#align is_closed.not IsClosed.not
/-!
### Interior of a set
-/
theorem mem_interior : x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp only [interior, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_interior mem_interiorₓ
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_interior : IsOpen (interior s) :=
isOpen_sUnion fun _ => And.left
#align is_open_interior isOpen_interior
theorem interior_subset : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ => And.right
#align interior_subset interior_subset
theorem interior_maximal (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align interior_maximal interior_maximal
theorem IsOpen.interior_eq (h : IsOpen s) : interior s = s :=
interior_subset.antisymm (interior_maximal (Subset.refl s) h)
#align is_open.interior_eq IsOpen.interior_eq
theorem interior_eq_iff_isOpen : interior s = s ↔ IsOpen s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isOpen_interior, IsOpen.interior_eq⟩
#align interior_eq_iff_is_open interior_eq_iff_isOpen
theorem subset_interior_iff_isOpen : s ⊆ interior s ↔ IsOpen s := by
simp only [interior_eq_iff_isOpen.symm, Subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
#align subset_interior_iff_is_open subset_interior_iff_isOpen
theorem IsOpen.subset_interior_iff (h₁ : IsOpen s) : s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => Subset.trans h interior_subset, fun h₂ => interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
#align is_open.subset_interior_iff IsOpen.subset_interior_iff
theorem subset_interior_iff : t ⊆ interior s ↔ ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨interior s, isOpen_interior, h, interior_subset⟩, fun ⟨_U, hU, htU, hUs⟩ =>
htU.trans (interior_maximal hUs hU)⟩
#align subset_interior_iff subset_interior_iff
lemma interior_subset_iff : interior s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t := by
simp [interior]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem interior_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (Subset.trans interior_subset h) isOpen_interior
#align interior_mono interior_mono
@[simp]
theorem interior_empty : interior (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isOpen_empty.interior_eq
#align interior_empty interior_empty
@[simp]
theorem interior_univ : interior (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isOpen_univ.interior_eq
#align interior_univ interior_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_eq_univ : interior s = univ ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => univ_subset_iff.mp <| h.symm.trans_le interior_subset, fun h => h.symm ▸ interior_univ⟩
#align interior_eq_univ interior_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_interior : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
isOpen_interior.interior_eq
#align interior_interior interior_interior
@[simp]
theorem interior_inter : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
(Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono) s t).antisymm <|
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) <|
isOpen_interior.inter isOpen_interior
#align interior_inter interior_inter
theorem Set.Finite.interior_biInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
hs.induction_on (by simp) <| by intros; simp [*]
theorem Set.Finite.interior_sInter {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
interior (⋂₀ S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, hS.interior_biInter]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.interior_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.interior_biInter f
#align finset.interior_Inter Finset.interior_iInter
@[simp]
theorem interior_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) := by
rw [← sInter_range, (finite_range f).interior_sInter, biInter_range]
#align interior_Inter interior_iInter_of_finite
theorem interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty (h₁ : IsClosed s)
(h₂ : interior t = ∅) : interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have : interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s := fun x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : IsOpen u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun hx₂ : x ∉ s =>
have : u \ s ⊆ t := fun x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂
have : u \ s ⊆ interior t := by rwa [(IsOpen.sdiff hu₁ h₁).subset_interior_iff]
have : u \ s ⊆ ∅ := by rwa [h₂] at this
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
Subset.antisymm (interior_maximal this isOpen_interior) (interior_mono subset_union_left)
#align interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty
theorem isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_isOpen]
simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
#align is_open_iff_forall_mem_open isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open
theorem interior_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set X) : interior (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, interior (s i) :=
subset_iInter fun _ => interior_mono <| iInter_subset _ _
#align interior_Inter_subset interior_iInter_subset
theorem interior_iInter₂_subset (p : ι → Sort*) (s : ∀ i, p i → Set X) :
interior (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), interior (s i j) :=
(interior_iInter_subset _).trans <| iInter_mono fun _ => interior_iInter_subset _
#align interior_Inter₂_subset interior_iInter₂_subset
theorem interior_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set X)) : interior (⋂₀ S) ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s :=
calc
interior (⋂₀ S) = interior (⋂ s ∈ S, s) := by rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
_ ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := interior_iInter₂_subset _ _
#align interior_sInter_subset interior_sInter_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' interior).HasBasis p fun i => interior (s i) :=
h.lift' fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono
theorem Filter.lift'_interior_le (l : Filter X) : l.lift' interior ≤ l := fun _s hs ↦
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (ho : ∀ i, p i → IsOpen (s i)) : l.lift' interior = l :=
le_antisymm l.lift'_interior_le <| h.lift'_interior.ge_iff.2 fun i hi ↦ by
simpa only [(ho i hi).interior_eq] using h.mem_of_mem hi
/-!
### Closure of a set
-/
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_closure : IsClosed (closure s) :=
isClosed_sInter fun _ => And.left
#align is_closed_closure isClosed_closure
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter fun _ => And.right
#align subset_closure subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : X} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align not_mem_of_not_mem_closure not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
theorem closure_minimal (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align closure_minimal closure_minimal
theorem Disjoint.closure_left (hd : Disjoint s t) (ht : IsOpen t) :
Disjoint (closure s) t :=
disjoint_compl_left.mono_left <| closure_minimal hd.subset_compl_right ht.isClosed_compl
#align disjoint.closure_left Disjoint.closure_left
theorem Disjoint.closure_right (hd : Disjoint s t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
Disjoint s (closure t) :=
(hd.symm.closure_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.closure_right Disjoint.closure_right
theorem IsClosed.closure_eq (h : IsClosed s) : closure s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (Subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
#align is_closed.closure_eq IsClosed.closure_eq
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : closure s ⊆ s :=
closure_minimal (Subset.refl _) hs
#align is_closed.closure_subset IsClosed.closure_subset
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset_iff (h₁ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => closure_minimal h h₁⟩
#align is_closed.closure_subset_iff IsClosed.closure_subset_iff
theorem IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) :
x ∈ s ↔ closure ({x} : Set X) ⊆ s :=
(hs.closure_subset_iff.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff).symm
#align is_closed.mem_iff_closure_subset IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem closure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (Subset.trans h subset_closure) isClosed_closure
#align closure_mono closure_mono
theorem monotone_closure (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Monotone (@closure X _) := fun _ _ =>
closure_mono
#align monotone_closure monotone_closure
theorem diff_subset_closure_iff : s \ t ⊆ closure t ↔ s ⊆ closure t := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, union_eq_self_of_subset_left subset_closure]
#align diff_subset_closure_iff diff_subset_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_subset_inter_closure (s t : Set X) :
closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ closure s ∩ closure t :=
(monotone_closure X).map_inf_le s t
#align closure_inter_subset_inter_closure closure_inter_subset_inter_closure
theorem isClosed_of_closure_subset (h : closure s ⊆ s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [subset_closure.antisymm h]; exact isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_of_closure_subset isClosed_of_closure_subset
theorem closure_eq_iff_isClosed : closure s = s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isClosed_closure, IsClosed.closure_eq⟩
#align closure_eq_iff_is_closed closure_eq_iff_isClosed
theorem closure_subset_iff_isClosed : closure s ⊆ s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨isClosed_of_closure_subset, IsClosed.closure_subset⟩
#align closure_subset_iff_is_closed closure_subset_iff_isClosed
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isClosed_empty.closure_eq
#align closure_empty closure_empty
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty_iff (s : Set X) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨subset_eq_empty subset_closure, fun h => h.symm ▸ closure_empty⟩
#align closure_empty_iff closure_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem closure_nonempty_iff : (closure s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, closure_empty_iff]
#align closure_nonempty_iff closure_nonempty_iff
alias ⟨Set.Nonempty.of_closure, Set.Nonempty.closure⟩ := closure_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty.of_closure Set.Nonempty.of_closure
#align set.nonempty.closure Set.Nonempty.closure
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isClosed_univ.closure_eq
#align closure_univ closure_univ
@[simp]
theorem closure_closure : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
isClosed_closure.closure_eq
#align closure_closure closure_closure
theorem closure_eq_compl_interior_compl : closure s = (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [interior, closure, compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of]
simp only [compl_subset_compl, isOpen_compl_iff]
#align closure_eq_compl_interior_compl closure_eq_compl_interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_union : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, compl_inter]
#align closure_union closure_union
theorem Set.Finite.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, hs.interior_biInter]
theorem Set.Finite.closure_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
closure (⋃₀ S) = ⋃ s ∈ S, closure s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, hS.closure_biUnion]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.closure_biUnion f
#align finset.closure_bUnion Finset.closure_biUnion
@[simp]
theorem closure_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) := by
rw [← sUnion_range, (finite_range _).closure_sUnion, biUnion_range]
#align closure_Union closure_iUnion_of_finite
theorem interior_subset_closure : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
Subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
#align interior_subset_closure interior_subset_closure
@[simp]
theorem interior_compl : interior sᶜ = (closure s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align interior_compl interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_compl : closure sᶜ = (interior s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align closure_compl closure_compl
theorem mem_closure_iff :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, IsOpen o → x ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h o oo ao =>
by_contradiction fun os =>
have : s ⊆ oᶜ := fun x xs xo => os ⟨x, xo, xs⟩
closure_minimal this (isClosed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
fun H _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun nc =>
let ⟨_, hc, hs⟩ := H _ h₁.isOpen_compl nc
hc (h₂ hs)⟩
#align mem_closure_iff mem_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff (h : IsOpen t) :
(closure s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hxcs, hxt⟩ => inter_comm t s ▸ mem_closure_iff.1 hxcs t h hxt, fun h =>
h.mono <| inf_le_inf_right t subset_closure⟩
#align closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff
theorem Filter.le_lift'_closure (l : Filter X) : l ≤ l.lift' closure :=
le_lift'.2 fun _ h => mem_of_superset h subset_closure
#align filter.le_lift'_closure Filter.le_lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' closure).HasBasis p fun i => closure (s i) :=
h.lift' (monotone_closure X)
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (hc : ∀ i, p i → IsClosed (s i)) : l.lift' closure = l :=
le_antisymm (h.ge_iff.2 fun i hi => (hc i hi).closure_eq ▸ mem_lift' (h.mem_of_mem hi))
l.le_lift'_closure
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure_eq_self Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot {l : Filter X} : l.lift' closure = ⊥ ↔ l = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique <| h ▸ l.le_lift'_closure, fun h =>
h.symm ▸ by rw [lift'_bot (monotone_closure _), closure_empty, principal_empty]⟩
#align filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot
theorem dense_iff_closure_eq : Dense s ↔ closure s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
#align dense_iff_closure_eq dense_iff_closure_eq
alias ⟨Dense.closure_eq, _⟩ := dense_iff_closure_eq
#align dense.closure_eq Dense.closure_eq
theorem interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl : interior s = ∅ ↔ Dense sᶜ := by
rw [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_compl, compl_univ_iff]
#align interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl
theorem Dense.interior_compl (h : Dense s) : interior sᶜ = ∅ :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 <| by rwa [compl_compl]
#align dense.interior_compl Dense.interior_compl
/-- The closure of a set `s` is dense if and only if `s` is dense. -/
@[simp]
theorem dense_closure : Dense (closure s) ↔ Dense s := by
rw [Dense, Dense, closure_closure]
#align dense_closure dense_closure
protected alias ⟨_, Dense.closure⟩ := dense_closure
alias ⟨Dense.of_closure, _⟩ := dense_closure
#align dense.of_closure Dense.of_closure
#align dense.closure Dense.closure
@[simp]
theorem dense_univ : Dense (univ : Set X) := fun _ => subset_closure trivial
#align dense_univ dense_univ
/-- A set is dense if and only if it has a nonempty intersection with each nonempty open set. -/
theorem dense_iff_inter_open :
Dense s ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U.Nonempty → (U ∩ s).Nonempty := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rintro U U_op ⟨x, x_in⟩
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (h _) U U_op x_in
· intro x
rw [mem_closure_iff]
intro U U_op x_in
exact h U U_op ⟨_, x_in⟩
#align dense_iff_inter_open dense_iff_inter_open
alias ⟨Dense.inter_open_nonempty, _⟩ := dense_iff_inter_open
#align dense.inter_open_nonempty Dense.inter_open_nonempty
theorem Dense.exists_mem_open (hs : Dense s) {U : Set X} (ho : IsOpen U)
(hne : U.Nonempty) : ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ U :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho hne
⟨x, hx.2, hx.1⟩
#align dense.exists_mem_open Dense.exists_mem_open
theorem Dense.nonempty_iff (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty ↔ Nonempty X :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty _ isOpen_univ ⟨x, trivial⟩
⟨y, hy.2⟩⟩
#align dense.nonempty_iff Dense.nonempty_iff
theorem Dense.nonempty [h : Nonempty X] (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.nonempty_iff.2 h
#align dense.nonempty Dense.nonempty
@[mono]
theorem Dense.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hd : Dense s₁) : Dense s₂ := fun x =>
closure_mono h (hd x)
#align dense.mono Dense.mono
/-- Complement to a singleton is dense if and only if the singleton is not an open set. -/
theorem dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open :
Dense ({x}ᶜ : Set X) ↔ ¬IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
constructor
· intro hd ho
exact (hd.inter_open_nonempty _ ho (singleton_nonempty _)).ne_empty (inter_compl_self _)
· refine fun ho => dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU hne => inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 fun hUx => ?_
obtain rfl : U = {x} := eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem.2 ⟨hne, hUx⟩
exact ho hU
#align dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open
/-!
### Frontier of a set
-/
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_interior (s : Set X) : closure s \ interior s = frontier s :=
rfl
#align closure_diff_interior closure_diff_interior
/-- Interior and frontier are disjoint. -/
lemma disjoint_interior_frontier : Disjoint (interior s) (frontier s) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← closure_diff_interior, diff_eq,
← inter_assoc, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, compl_inter_self, empty_inter]
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right_self, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset_closure]
#align closure_diff_frontier closure_diff_frontier
@[simp]
theorem self_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right, diff_eq_empty.2 subset_closure,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset, empty_union]
#align self_diff_frontier self_diff_frontier
theorem frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure : frontier s = closure s ∩ closure sᶜ := by
rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
#align frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure
theorem frontier_subset_closure : frontier s ⊆ closure s :=
diff_subset
#align frontier_subset_closure frontier_subset_closure
theorem IsClosed.frontier_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s ⊆ s :=
frontier_subset_closure.trans hs.closure_eq.subset
#align is_closed.frontier_subset IsClosed.frontier_subset
theorem frontier_closure_subset : frontier (closure s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff closure_closure.subset <| interior_mono subset_closure
#align frontier_closure_subset frontier_closure_subset
theorem frontier_interior_subset : frontier (interior s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff (closure_mono interior_subset) interior_interior.symm.subset
#align frontier_interior_subset frontier_interior_subset
/-- The complement of a set has the same frontier as the original set. -/
@[simp]
theorem frontier_compl (s : Set X) : frontier sᶜ = frontier s := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_compl, inter_comm]
#align frontier_compl frontier_compl
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ : frontier (univ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_univ frontier_univ
@[simp]
theorem frontier_empty : frontier (∅ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_empty frontier_empty
theorem frontier_inter_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure t ∪ closure s ∩ frontier t := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_inter, closure_union]
refine (inter_subset_inter_left _ (closure_inter_subset_inter_closure s t)).trans_eq ?_
simp only [inter_union_distrib_left, union_inter_distrib_right, inter_assoc,
inter_comm (closure t)]
#align frontier_inter_subset frontier_inter_subset
theorem frontier_union_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∪ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure tᶜ ∪ closure sᶜ ∩ frontier t := by
simpa only [frontier_compl, ← compl_union] using frontier_inter_subset sᶜ tᶜ
#align frontier_union_subset frontier_union_subset
theorem IsClosed.frontier_eq (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s = s \ interior s := by
rw [frontier, hs.closure_eq]
#align is_closed.frontier_eq IsClosed.frontier_eq
theorem IsOpen.frontier_eq (hs : IsOpen s) : frontier s = closure s \ s := by
rw [frontier, hs.interior_eq]
#align is_open.frontier_eq IsOpen.frontier_eq
theorem IsOpen.inter_frontier_eq (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ frontier s = ∅ := by
rw [hs.frontier_eq, inter_diff_self]
#align is_open.inter_frontier_eq IsOpen.inter_frontier_eq
/-- The frontier of a set is closed. -/
theorem isClosed_frontier : IsClosed (frontier s) := by
rw [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure]; exact IsClosed.inter isClosed_closure isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_frontier isClosed_frontier
/-- The frontier of a closed set has no interior point. -/
theorem interior_frontier (h : IsClosed s) : interior (frontier s) = ∅ := by
have A : frontier s = s \ interior s := h.frontier_eq
have B : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s := by rw [A]; exact interior_mono diff_subset
have C : interior (frontier s) ⊆ frontier s := interior_subset
have : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s ∩ (s \ interior s) :=
subset_inter B (by simpa [A] using C)
rwa [inter_diff_self, subset_empty_iff] at this
#align interior_frontier interior_frontier
theorem closure_eq_interior_union_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s = interior s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel interior_subset_closure).symm
#align closure_eq_interior_union_frontier closure_eq_interior_union_frontier
theorem closure_eq_self_union_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s = s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel' interior_subset subset_closure).symm
#align closure_eq_self_union_frontier closure_eq_self_union_frontier
theorem Disjoint.frontier_left (ht : IsOpen t) (hd : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (frontier s) t :=
subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right.1 <|
frontier_subset_closure.trans <| closure_minimal (disjoint_left.1 hd) <| isClosed_compl_iff.2 ht
#align disjoint.frontier_left Disjoint.frontier_left
theorem Disjoint.frontier_right (hs : IsOpen s) (hd : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint s (frontier t) :=
(hd.symm.frontier_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.frontier_right Disjoint.frontier_right
theorem frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior :
frontier s = (interior s)ᶜ ∩ (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [← frontier_compl, ← closure_compl, ← diff_eq, closure_diff_interior]
#align frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior
theorem compl_frontier_eq_union_interior :
(frontier s)ᶜ = interior s ∪ interior sᶜ := by
rw [frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior]
simp only [compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align compl_frontier_eq_union_interior compl_frontier_eq_union_interior
/-!
### Neighborhoods
-/
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 783 | 784 | theorem nhds_def' (x : X) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsOpen s) (_ : x ∈ s), 𝓟 s := by |
simp only [nhds_def, mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (x ∈ _), iInf_and]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Newell Jensen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Newell Jensen, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PresentedGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Matrix
/-!
# Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems
This file defines Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems.
Let `B` be a (possibly infinite) type, and let $M = (M_{i,i'})_{i, i' \in B}$ be a matrix
of natural numbers. Further assume that $M$ is a *Coxeter matrix* (`CoxeterMatrix`); that is, $M$ is
symmetric and $M_{i,i'} = 1$ if and only if $i = i'$. The *Coxeter group* associated to $M$
(`CoxeterMatrix.group`) has the presentation
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$
The elements $s_i$ are called the *simple reflections* (`CoxeterMatrix.simple`) of the Coxeter
group. Note that every simple reflection is an involution.
A *Coxeter system* (`CoxeterSystem`) is a group $W$, together with an isomorphism between $W$ and
the Coxeter group associated to some Coxeter matrix $M$. By abuse of language, we also say that $W$
is a Coxeter group (`IsCoxeterGroup`), and we may speak of the simple reflections $s_i \in W$
(`CoxeterSystem.simple`). We state all of our results about Coxeter groups in terms of Coxeter
systems where possible.
Let $W$ be a group equipped with a Coxeter system. For all monoids $G$ and all functions
$f \colon B \to G$ whose values satisfy the Coxeter relations, we may lift $f$ to a multiplicative
homomorphism $W \to G$ (`CoxeterSystem.lift`) in a unique way.
A *word* is a sequence of elements of $B$. The word $(i_1, \ldots, i_\ell)$ has a corresponding
product $s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell} \in W$ (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd`). Every element of $W$ is the
product of some word (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd_surjective`). The words that alternate between two
elements of $B$ (`CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`) are particularly important.
## Implementation details
Much of the literature on Coxeter groups conflates the set $S = \{s_i : i \in B\} \subseteq W$ of
simple reflections with the set $B$ that indexes the simple reflections. This is usually permissible
because the simple reflections $s_i$ of any Coxeter group are all distinct (a nontrivial fact that
we do not prove in this file). In contrast, we try not to refer to the set $S$ of simple
reflections unless necessary; instead, we state our results in terms of $B$ wherever possible.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterMatrix.Group`
* `CoxeterSystem`
* `IsCoxeterGroup`
* `CoxeterSystem.simple` : If `cs` is a Coxeter system on the group `W`, then `cs.simple i` is the
simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.lift` : Extend a function `f : B → G` to a monoid homomorphism `f' : W → G`
satisfying `f' (cs.simple i) = f i` for all `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.wordProd`
* `CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 4--6*](bourbaki1968) chapter IV
pages 4--5, 13--15
* [J. Baez, *Coxeter and Dynkin Diagrams*](https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/twf_dynkin.pdf)
## TODO
* The simple reflections of a Coxeter system are distinct.
* Introduce some ways to actually construct some Coxeter groups. For example, given a Coxeter matrix
$M : B \times B \to \mathbb{N}$, a real vector space $V$, a basis $\{\alpha_i : i \in B\}$
and a bilinear form $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle \colon V \times V \to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying
$$\langle \alpha_i, \alpha_{i'}\rangle = - \cos(\pi / M_{i,i'}),$$ one can form the subgroup of
$GL(V)$ generated by the reflections in the $\alpha_i$, and it is a Coxeter group. We can use this
to combinatorially describe the Coxeter groups of type $A$, $B$, $D$, and $I$.
* State and prove Matsumoto's theorem.
* Classify the finite Coxeter groups.
## Tags
coxeter system, coxeter group
-/
open Function Set List
/-! ### Coxeter groups -/
namespace CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B) (e : B ≃ B')
/-- The Coxeter relation associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$ and two indices $i, i' \in B$.
That is, the relation $(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}$, considered as an element of the free group
on $\{s_i\}_{i \in B}$.
If $M_{i, i'} = 0$, then this is the identity, indicating that there is no relation between
$s_i$ and $s_{i'}$. -/
def relation (i i' : B) : FreeGroup B := (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i'
/-- The set of all Coxeter relations associated to the Coxeter matrix $M$. -/
def relationsSet : Set (FreeGroup B) := range <| uncurry M.relation
/-- The Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$; that is, the group
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$ -/
protected def Group : Type _ := PresentedGroup M.relationsSet
instance : Group M.Group := QuotientGroup.Quotient.group _
/-- The simple reflection of the Coxeter group `M.group` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : M.Group := PresentedGroup.of i
theorem reindex_relationsSet :
(M.reindex e).relationsSet =
FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e '' M.relationsSet := let M' := M.reindex e; calc
Set.range (uncurry M'.relation)
_ = Set.range (uncurry M'.relation ∘ Prod.map e e) := by simp [Set.range_comp]
_ = Set.range (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e ∘ uncurry M.relation) := by
apply congrArg Set.range
ext ⟨i, i'⟩
simp [relation, reindex_apply, M']
_ = _ := by simp [Set.range_comp, relationsSet]
/-- The isomorphism between the Coxeter group associated to the reindexed matrix `M.reindex e` and
the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def reindexGroupEquiv : (M.reindex e).Group ≃* M.Group :=
.symm <| QuotientGroup.congr
(Subgroup.normalClosure M.relationsSet)
(Subgroup.normalClosure (M.reindex e).relationsSet)
(FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e)
(by
rw [reindex_relationsSet,
Subgroup.map_normalClosure _ _ (by simpa using (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e).surjective),
MonoidHom.coe_coe])
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_apply_simple (i : B') :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e) ((M.reindex e).simple i) = M.simple (e.symm i) := rfl
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_symm_apply_simple (i : B) :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm (M.simple i) = (M.reindex e).simple (e i) := rfl
end CoxeterMatrix
/-! ### Coxeter systems -/
section
variable {B : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B)
/-- A Coxeter system `CoxeterSystem M W` is a structure recording the isomorphism between
a group `W` and the Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
@[ext]
structure CoxeterSystem (W : Type*) [Group W] where
/-- The isomorphism between `W` and the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
mulEquiv : W ≃* M.Group
/-- A group is a Coxeter group if it admits a Coxeter system for some Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
class IsCoxeterGroup.{u} (W : Type u) [Group W] : Prop where
nonempty_system : ∃ B : Type u, ∃ M : CoxeterMatrix B, Nonempty (CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- The canonical Coxeter system on the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem : CoxeterSystem M M.Group := ⟨.refl _⟩
end
namespace CoxeterSystem
open CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (e : B ≃ B')
variable {W H : Type*} [Group W] [Group H]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- Reindex a Coxeter system through a bijection of the indexing sets. -/
@[simps]
protected def reindex (e : B ≃ B') : CoxeterSystem (M.reindex e) W :=
⟨cs.mulEquiv.trans (M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm⟩
/-- Push a Coxeter system through a group isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (e : W ≃* H) : CoxeterSystem M H := ⟨e.symm.trans cs.mulEquiv⟩
/-! ### Simple reflections -/
/-- The simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : W := cs.mulEquiv.symm (PresentedGroup.of i)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem_simple (M : CoxeterMatrix B) :
M.toCoxeterSystem.simple = M.simple := rfl
@[simp] theorem reindex_simple (i' : B') : (cs.reindex e).simple i' = cs.simple (e.symm i') := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_simple (e : W ≃* H) (i : B) : (cs.map e).simple i = e (cs.simple i) := rfl
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
@[simp]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean | 196 | 201 | theorem simple_mul_simple_self (i : B) : s i * s i = 1 := by |
have : (FreeGroup.of i) * (FreeGroup.of i) ∈ M.relationsSet := ⟨(i, i), by simp [relation]⟩
have : (QuotientGroup.mk (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i) : M.Group) = 1 :=
(QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mpr (Subgroup.subset_normalClosure this)
unfold simple
rw [← map_mul, PresentedGroup.of, ← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, this, map_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Directed
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IntermediateField
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.IsSplittingField
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
#align_import field_theory.adjoin from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
/-!
# Adjoining Elements to Fields
In this file we introduce the notion of adjoining elements to fields.
This isn't quite the same as adjoining elements to rings.
For example, `Algebra.adjoin K {x}` might not include `x⁻¹`.
## Main results
- `adjoin_adjoin_left`: adjoining S and then T is the same as adjoining `S ∪ T`.
- `bot_eq_top_of_rank_adjoin_eq_one`: if `F⟮x⟯` has dimension `1` over `F` for every `x`
in `E` then `F = E`
## Notation
- `F⟮α⟯`: adjoin a single element `α` to `F` (in scope `IntermediateField`).
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial
open scoped Classical Polynomial
namespace IntermediateField
section AdjoinDef
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E] (S : Set E)
-- Porting note: not adding `neg_mem'` causes an error.
/-- `adjoin F S` extends a field `F` by adjoining a set `S ⊆ E`. -/
def adjoin : IntermediateField F E :=
{ Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S) with
algebraMap_mem' := fun x => Subfield.subset_closure (Or.inl (Set.mem_range_self x)) }
#align intermediate_field.adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin
variable {S}
theorem mem_adjoin_iff (x : E) :
x ∈ adjoin F S ↔ ∃ r s : MvPolynomial S F,
x = MvPolynomial.aeval Subtype.val r / MvPolynomial.aeval Subtype.val s := by
simp only [adjoin, mem_mk, Subring.mem_toSubsemiring, Subfield.mem_toSubring,
Subfield.mem_closure_iff, ← Algebra.adjoin_eq_ring_closure, Subalgebra.mem_toSubring,
Algebra.adjoin_eq_range, AlgHom.mem_range, exists_exists_eq_and]
tauto
theorem mem_adjoin_simple_iff {α : E} (x : E) :
x ∈ adjoin F {α} ↔ ∃ r s : F[X], x = aeval α r / aeval α s := by
simp only [adjoin, mem_mk, Subring.mem_toSubsemiring, Subfield.mem_toSubring,
Subfield.mem_closure_iff, ← Algebra.adjoin_eq_ring_closure, Subalgebra.mem_toSubring,
Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval, AlgHom.mem_range, exists_exists_eq_and]
tauto
end AdjoinDef
section Lattice
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E]
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : Set E} {T : IntermediateField F E} : adjoin F S ≤ T ↔ S ≤ T :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (le_trans Set.subset_union_right Subfield.subset_closure) H, fun H =>
(@Subfield.closure_le E _ (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S) T.toSubfield).mpr
(Set.union_subset (IntermediateField.set_range_subset T) H)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_le_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_le_iff
theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin F : Set E → IntermediateField F E)
(fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) := fun _ _ =>
adjoin_le_iff
#align intermediate_field.gc IntermediateField.gc
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `coe`. -/
def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin F : Set E → IntermediateField F E)
(fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) where
choice s hs := (adjoin F s).copy s <| le_antisymm (gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := IntermediateField.gc
le_l_u S := (IntermediateField.gc (S : Set E) (adjoin F S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := copy_eq _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.gi IntermediateField.gi
instance : CompleteLattice (IntermediateField F E) where
__ := GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice IntermediateField.gi
bot :=
{ toSubalgebra := ⊥
inv_mem' := by rintro x ⟨r, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r⁻¹, map_inv₀ _ _⟩ }
bot_le x := (bot_le : ⊥ ≤ x.toSubalgebra)
instance : Inhabited (IntermediateField F E) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : Unique (IntermediateField F F) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (IntermediateField F F)) with
uniq := fun _ ↦ toSubalgebra_injective <| Subsingleton.elim _ _ }
theorem coe_bot : ↑(⊥ : IntermediateField F E) = Set.range (algebraMap F E) := rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_bot IntermediateField.coe_bot
theorem mem_bot {x : E} : x ∈ (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) ↔ x ∈ Set.range (algebraMap F E) :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_bot IntermediateField.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_toSubalgebra : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E).toSubalgebra = ⊥ := rfl
#align intermediate_field.bot_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.bot_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ↑(⊤ : IntermediateField F E) = (Set.univ : Set E) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_top IntermediateField.coe_top
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : E} : x ∈ (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) :=
trivial
#align intermediate_field.mem_top IntermediateField.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubalgebra : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).toSubalgebra = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.top_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.top_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubfield : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).toSubfield = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.top_to_subfield IntermediateField.top_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (S T : IntermediateField F E) : (↑(S ⊓ T) : Set E) = (S : Set E) ∩ T :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_inf IntermediateField.coe_inf
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {S T : IntermediateField F E} {x : E} : x ∈ S ⊓ T ↔ x ∈ S ∧ x ∈ T :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_inf IntermediateField.mem_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubalgebra (S T : IntermediateField F E) :
(S ⊓ T).toSubalgebra = S.toSubalgebra ⊓ T.toSubalgebra :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.inf_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.inf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubfield (S T : IntermediateField F E) :
(S ⊓ T).toSubfield = S.toSubfield ⊓ T.toSubfield :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.inf_to_subfield IntermediateField.inf_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set E) =
sInf ((fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) '' S) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_Inf IntermediateField.coe_sInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubalgebra (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) :
(sInf S).toSubalgebra = sInf (toSubalgebra '' S) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [Set.sUnion_image]
#align intermediate_field.Inf_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.sInf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubfield (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) :
(sInf S).toSubfield = sInf (toSubfield '' S) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [Set.sUnion_image]
#align intermediate_field.Inf_to_subfield IntermediateField.sInf_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) : (↑(iInf S) : Set E) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.coe_infi IntermediateField.coe_iInf
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubalgebra {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iInf S).toSubalgebra = ⨅ i, (S i).toSubalgebra :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.infi_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.iInf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubfield {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iInf S).toSubfield = ⨅ i, (S i).toSubfield :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.infi_to_subfield IntermediateField.iInf_toSubfield
/-- Construct an algebra isomorphism from an equality of intermediate fields -/
@[simps! apply]
def equivOfEq {S T : IntermediateField F E} (h : S = T) : S ≃ₐ[F] T :=
Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ (congr_arg toSubalgebra h)
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq IntermediateField.equivOfEq
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_symm {S T : IntermediateField F E} (h : S = T) :
(equivOfEq h).symm = equivOfEq h.symm :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_symm IntermediateField.equivOfEq_symm
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_rfl (S : IntermediateField F E) : equivOfEq (rfl : S = S) = AlgEquiv.refl := by
ext; rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_rfl IntermediateField.equivOfEq_rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_trans {S T U : IntermediateField F E} (hST : S = T) (hTU : T = U) :
(equivOfEq hST).trans (equivOfEq hTU) = equivOfEq (hST.trans hTU) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_trans IntermediateField.equivOfEq_trans
variable (F E)
/-- The bottom intermediate_field is isomorphic to the field. -/
noncomputable def botEquiv : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) ≃ₐ[F] F :=
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ bot_toSubalgebra).trans (Algebra.botEquiv F E)
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv IntermediateField.botEquiv
variable {F E}
-- Porting note: this was tagged `simp`.
theorem botEquiv_def (x : F) : botEquiv F E (algebraMap F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) x) = x := by
simp
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv_def IntermediateField.botEquiv_def
@[simp]
theorem botEquiv_symm (x : F) : (botEquiv F E).symm x = algebraMap F _ x :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv_symm IntermediateField.botEquiv_symm
noncomputable instance algebraOverBot : Algebra (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F :=
(IntermediateField.botEquiv F E).toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
#align intermediate_field.algebra_over_bot IntermediateField.algebraOverBot
theorem coe_algebraMap_over_bot :
(algebraMap (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) → F) =
IntermediateField.botEquiv F E :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_algebra_map_over_bot IntermediateField.coe_algebraMap_over_bot
instance isScalarTower_over_bot : IsScalarTower (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F E :=
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq
(by
intro x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (botEquiv F E).symm.surjective x
rw [coe_algebraMap_over_bot, (botEquiv F E).apply_symm_apply, botEquiv_symm,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) E])
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_over_bot IntermediateField.isScalarTower_over_bot
/-- The top `IntermediateField` is isomorphic to the field.
This is the intermediate field version of `Subalgebra.topEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) ≃ₐ[F] E :=
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ top_toSubalgebra).trans Subalgebra.topEquiv
#align intermediate_field.top_equiv IntermediateField.topEquiv
-- Porting note: this theorem is now generated by the `@[simps!]` above.
#align intermediate_field.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe IntermediateField.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_bot_eq_self (K : IntermediateField F E) :
(⊥ : IntermediateField K E).restrictScalars _ = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective Subtype.range_coe
#align intermediate_field.restrict_scalars_bot_eq_self IntermediateField.restrictScalars_bot_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_top {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra K E] [Algebra K F]
[IsScalarTower K F E] : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).restrictScalars K = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.restrict_scalars_top IntermediateField.restrictScalars_top
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra F K]
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : E →ₐ[F] K) :
IntermediateField.map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
toSubalgebra_injective <| Algebra.map_bot _
theorem map_sup (s t : IntermediateField F E) (f : E →ₐ[F] K) : (s ⊔ t).map f = s.map f ⊔ t.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : E →ₐ[F] K) (s : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
theorem _root_.AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map (f : E →ₐ[F] K) :
f.fieldRange = IntermediateField.map f ⊤ :=
SetLike.ext' Set.image_univ.symm
#align alg_hom.field_range_eq_map AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_fieldRange {L : Type*} [Field L] [Algebra F L]
(f : E →ₐ[F] K) (g : K →ₐ[F] L) : f.fieldRange.map g = (g.comp f).fieldRange :=
SetLike.ext' (Set.range_comp g f).symm
#align alg_hom.map_field_range AlgHom.map_fieldRange
theorem _root_.AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top {f : E →ₐ[F] K} :
f.fieldRange = ⊤ ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans Set.range_iff_surjective
#align alg_hom.field_range_eq_top AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AlgEquiv.fieldRange_eq_top (f : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
(f : E →ₐ[F] K).fieldRange = ⊤ :=
AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top.mpr f.surjective
#align alg_equiv.field_range_eq_top AlgEquiv.fieldRange_eq_top
end Lattice
section equivMap
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E]
{K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra F K] (L : IntermediateField F E) (f : E →ₐ[F] K)
theorem fieldRange_comp_val : (f.comp L.val).fieldRange = L.map f := toSubalgebra_injective <| by
rw [toSubalgebra_map, AlgHom.fieldRange_toSubalgebra, AlgHom.range_comp, range_val]
/-- An intermediate field is isomorphic to its image under an `AlgHom`
(which is automatically injective) -/
noncomputable def equivMap : L ≃ₐ[F] L.map f :=
(AlgEquiv.ofInjective _ (f.comp L.val).injective).trans (equivOfEq (fieldRange_comp_val L f))
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMap_apply (x : L) : ↑(equivMap L f x) = f x := rfl
end equivMap
section AdjoinDef
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E] (S : Set E)
theorem adjoin_eq_range_algebraMap_adjoin :
(adjoin F S : Set E) = Set.range (algebraMap (adjoin F S) E) :=
Subtype.range_coe.symm
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_eq_range_algebra_map_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_eq_range_algebraMap_adjoin
theorem adjoin.algebraMap_mem (x : F) : algebraMap F E x ∈ adjoin F S :=
IntermediateField.algebraMap_mem (adjoin F S) x
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.algebra_map_mem IntermediateField.adjoin.algebraMap_mem
theorem adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset : Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ adjoin F S := by
intro x hx
cases' hx with f hf
rw [← hf]
exact adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S f
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.range_algebra_map_subset IntermediateField.adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset
instance adjoin.fieldCoe : CoeTC F (adjoin F S) where
coe x := ⟨algebraMap F E x, adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S x⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.field_coe IntermediateField.adjoin.fieldCoe
theorem subset_adjoin : S ⊆ adjoin F S := fun _ hx => Subfield.subset_closure (Or.inr hx)
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin IntermediateField.subset_adjoin
instance adjoin.setCoe : CoeTC S (adjoin F S) where coe x := ⟨x, subset_adjoin F S (Subtype.mem x)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.set_coe IntermediateField.adjoin.setCoe
@[mono]
theorem adjoin.mono (T : Set E) (h : S ⊆ T) : adjoin F S ≤ adjoin F T :=
GaloisConnection.monotone_l gc h
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.mono IntermediateField.adjoin.mono
theorem adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield (F : Subfield E) : (F : Set E) ⊆ adjoin F S := fun x hx =>
adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S ⟨x, hx⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield IntermediateField.adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield
theorem subset_adjoin_of_subset_left {F : Subfield E} {T : Set E} (HT : T ⊆ F) : T ⊆ adjoin F S :=
fun x hx => (adjoin F S).algebraMap_mem ⟨x, HT hx⟩
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin_of_subset_left IntermediateField.subset_adjoin_of_subset_left
theorem subset_adjoin_of_subset_right {T : Set E} (H : T ⊆ S) : T ⊆ adjoin F S := fun _ hx =>
subset_adjoin F S (H hx)
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin_of_subset_right IntermediateField.subset_adjoin_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_empty (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E] : adjoin F (∅ : Set E) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr (adjoin_le_iff.mpr (Set.empty_subset _))
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_empty IntermediateField.adjoin_empty
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_univ (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E] :
adjoin F (Set.univ : Set E) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <| subset_adjoin _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_univ IntermediateField.adjoin_univ
/-- If `K` is a field with `F ⊆ K` and `S ⊆ K` then `adjoin F S ≤ K`. -/
theorem adjoin_le_subfield {K : Subfield E} (HF : Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ K) (HS : S ⊆ K) :
(adjoin F S).toSubfield ≤ K := by
apply Subfield.closure_le.mpr
rw [Set.union_subset_iff]
exact ⟨HF, HS⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_le_subfield IntermediateField.adjoin_le_subfield
theorem adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff {F' : Type*} [Field F'] [Algebra F' E] {S S' : Set E} :
(adjoin F S : Set E) ⊆ adjoin F' S' ↔
Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ adjoin F' S' ∧ S ⊆ adjoin F' S' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset _ _).trans h,
(subset_adjoin _ _).trans h⟩, fun ⟨hF, hS⟩ =>
(Subfield.closure_le (t := (adjoin F' S').toSubfield)).mpr (Set.union_subset hF hS)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff
/-- `F[S][T] = F[S ∪ T]` -/
theorem adjoin_adjoin_left (T : Set E) :
(adjoin (adjoin F S) T).restrictScalars _ = adjoin F (S ∪ T) := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
change (↑(adjoin (adjoin F S) T) : Set E) = _
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset <;> rw [adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff] <;> constructor
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩; exact adjoin.mono _ _ _ Set.subset_union_left hx
· exact subset_adjoin_of_subset_right _ _ Set.subset_union_right
-- Porting note: orginal proof times out
· rintro x ⟨f, rfl⟩
refine Subfield.subset_closure ?_
left
exact ⟨f, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: orginal proof times out
· refine Set.union_subset (fun x hx => Subfield.subset_closure ?_)
(fun x hx => Subfield.subset_closure ?_)
· left
refine ⟨⟨x, Subfield.subset_closure ?_⟩, rfl⟩
right
exact hx
· right
exact hx
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_adjoin_left IntermediateField.adjoin_adjoin_left
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_insert_adjoin (x : E) :
adjoin F (insert x (adjoin F S : Set E)) = adjoin F (insert x S) :=
le_antisymm
(adjoin_le_iff.mpr
(Set.insert_subset_iff.mpr
⟨subset_adjoin _ _ (Set.mem_insert _ _),
adjoin_le_iff.mpr (subset_adjoin_of_subset_right _ _ (Set.subset_insert _ _))⟩))
(adjoin.mono _ _ _ (Set.insert_subset_insert (subset_adjoin _ _)))
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_insert_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_insert_adjoin
/-- `F[S][T] = F[T][S]` -/
theorem adjoin_adjoin_comm (T : Set E) :
(adjoin (adjoin F S) T).restrictScalars F = (adjoin (adjoin F T) S).restrictScalars F := by
rw [adjoin_adjoin_left, adjoin_adjoin_left, Set.union_comm]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_adjoin_comm IntermediateField.adjoin_adjoin_comm
theorem adjoin_map {E' : Type*} [Field E'] [Algebra F E'] (f : E →ₐ[F] E') :
(adjoin F S).map f = adjoin F (f '' S) := by
ext x
show
x ∈ (Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S)).map (f : E →+* E') ↔
x ∈ Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E') ∪ f '' S)
rw [RingHom.map_field_closure, Set.image_union, ← Set.range_comp, ← RingHom.coe_comp,
f.comp_algebraMap]
rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_map IntermediateField.adjoin_map
@[simp]
theorem lift_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E) (S : Set K) :
lift (adjoin F S) = adjoin F (Subtype.val '' S) :=
adjoin_map _ _ _
theorem lift_adjoin_simple (K : IntermediateField F E) (α : K) :
lift (adjoin F {α}) = adjoin F {α.1} := by
simp only [lift_adjoin, Set.image_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem lift_bot (K : IntermediateField F E) :
lift (F := K) ⊥ = ⊥ := map_bot _
@[simp]
theorem lift_top (K : IntermediateField F E) :
lift (F := K) ⊤ = K := by rw [lift, ← AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map, fieldRange_val]
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_self (K : IntermediateField F E) :
adjoin F K = K := le_antisymm (adjoin_le_iff.2 fun _ ↦ id) (subset_adjoin F _)
theorem restrictScalars_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E) (S : Set E) :
restrictScalars F (adjoin K S) = adjoin F (K ∪ S) := by
rw [← adjoin_self _ K, adjoin_adjoin_left, adjoin_self _ K]
variable {F} in
theorem extendScalars_adjoin {K : IntermediateField F E} {S : Set E} (h : K ≤ adjoin F S) :
extendScalars h = adjoin K S := restrictScalars_injective F <| by
rw [extendScalars_restrictScalars, restrictScalars_adjoin]
exact le_antisymm (adjoin.mono F S _ Set.subset_union_right) <| adjoin_le_iff.2 <|
Set.union_subset h (subset_adjoin F S)
variable {F} in
/-- If `E / L / F` and `E / L' / F` are two field extension towers, `L ≃ₐ[F] L'` is an isomorphism
compatible with `E / L` and `E / L'`, then for any subset `S` of `E`, `L(S)` and `L'(S)` are
equal as intermediate fields of `E / F`. -/
theorem restrictScalars_adjoin_of_algEquiv
{L L' : Type*} [Field L] [Field L']
[Algebra F L] [Algebra L E] [Algebra F L'] [Algebra L' E]
[IsScalarTower F L E] [IsScalarTower F L' E] (i : L ≃ₐ[F] L')
(hi : algebraMap L E = (algebraMap L' E) ∘ i) (S : Set E) :
(adjoin L S).restrictScalars F = (adjoin L' S).restrictScalars F := by
apply_fun toSubfield using (fun K K' h ↦ by
ext x; change x ∈ K.toSubfield ↔ x ∈ K'.toSubfield; rw [h])
change Subfield.closure _ = Subfield.closure _
congr
ext x
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨i y, by rw [← h, hi]; rfl⟩,
fun ⟨y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨i.symm y, by rw [← h, hi, Function.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply]⟩⟩
theorem algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin : Algebra.adjoin F S ≤ (adjoin F S).toSubalgebra :=
Algebra.adjoin_le (subset_adjoin _ _)
#align intermediate_field.algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin IntermediateField.algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin
theorem adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ Algebra.adjoin F S, x⁻¹ ∈ Algebra.adjoin F S) :
(adjoin F S).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S :=
le_antisymm
(show adjoin F S ≤
{ Algebra.adjoin F S with
inv_mem' := inv_mem }
from adjoin_le_iff.mpr Algebra.subset_adjoin)
(algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin _ _)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin
theorem eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E)
(h : K.toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S) : K = adjoin F S := by
apply toSubalgebra_injective
rw [h]
refine (adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin F _ ?_).symm
intro x
convert K.inv_mem (x := x) <;> rw [← h] <;> rfl
#align intermediate_field.eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin IntermediateField.eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin
theorem adjoin_eq_top_of_algebra (hS : Algebra.adjoin F S = ⊤) : adjoin F S = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp (hS.symm.trans_le <| algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin F S)
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction {s : Set E} {p : E → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ adjoin F s) (mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(algebraMap : ∀ x, p (algebraMap F E x)) (add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(neg : ∀ x, p x → p (-x)) (inv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) (mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) :
p x :=
Subfield.closure_induction h
(fun x hx => Or.casesOn hx (fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => hx ▸ algebraMap x) (mem x))
((_root_.algebraMap F E).map_one ▸ algebraMap 1) add neg inv mul
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_induction IntermediateField.adjoin_induction
/- Porting note (kmill): this notation is replacing the typeclass-based one I had previously
written, and it gives true `{x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ}` sets in the `adjoin` term. -/
open Lean in
/-- Supporting function for the `F⟮x₁,x₂,...,xₙ⟯` adjunction notation. -/
private partial def mkInsertTerm [Monad m] [MonadQuotation m] (xs : TSyntaxArray `term) : m Term :=
run 0
where
run (i : Nat) : m Term := do
if i + 1 == xs.size then
``(singleton $(xs[i]!))
else if i < xs.size then
``(insert $(xs[i]!) $(← run (i + 1)))
else
``(EmptyCollection.emptyCollection)
/-- If `x₁ x₂ ... xₙ : E` then `F⟮x₁,x₂,...,xₙ⟯` is the `IntermediateField F E`
generated by these elements. -/
scoped macro:max K:term "⟮" xs:term,* "⟯" : term => do ``(adjoin $K $(← mkInsertTerm xs.getElems))
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
@[delab app.IntermediateField.adjoin]
partial def delabAdjoinNotation : Delab := whenPPOption getPPNotation do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``adjoin 6
let F ← withNaryArg 0 delab
let xs ← withNaryArg 5 delabInsertArray
`($F⟮$(xs.toArray),*⟯)
where
delabInsertArray : DelabM (List Term) := do
let e ← getExpr
if e.isAppOfArity ``EmptyCollection.emptyCollection 2 then
return []
else if e.isAppOfArity ``singleton 4 then
let x ← withNaryArg 3 delab
return [x]
else if e.isAppOfArity ``insert 5 then
let x ← withNaryArg 3 delab
let xs ← withNaryArg 4 delabInsertArray
return x :: xs
else failure
section AdjoinSimple
variable (α : E)
-- Porting note: in all the theorems below, mathport translated `F⟮α⟯` into `F⟮⟯`.
theorem mem_adjoin_simple_self : α ∈ F⟮α⟯ :=
subset_adjoin F {α} (Set.mem_singleton α)
#align intermediate_field.mem_adjoin_simple_self IntermediateField.mem_adjoin_simple_self
/-- generator of `F⟮α⟯` -/
def AdjoinSimple.gen : F⟮α⟯ :=
⟨α, mem_adjoin_simple_self F α⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.gen
@[simp]
theorem AdjoinSimple.coe_gen : (AdjoinSimple.gen F α : E) = α :=
rfl
theorem AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen : algebraMap F⟮α⟯ E (AdjoinSimple.gen F α) = α :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.algebra_map_gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen
@[simp]
theorem AdjoinSimple.isIntegral_gen : IsIntegral F (AdjoinSimple.gen F α) ↔ IsIntegral F α := by
conv_rhs => rw [← AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen F α]
rw [isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap F⟮α⟯ E).injective]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.is_integral_gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.isIntegral_gen
theorem adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple (β : E) : F⟮α⟯⟮β⟯.restrictScalars F = F⟮α, β⟯ :=
adjoin_adjoin_left _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple
theorem adjoin_simple_comm (β : E) : F⟮α⟯⟮β⟯.restrictScalars F = F⟮β⟯⟮α⟯.restrictScalars F :=
adjoin_adjoin_comm _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_comm IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_comm
variable {F} {α}
theorem adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra {S : Set E} (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, IsAlgebraic F x) :
(IntermediateField.adjoin F S).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S := by
simp only [isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral] at hS
have : Algebra.IsIntegral F (Algebra.adjoin F S) := by
rwa [← le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff]
have : IsField (Algebra.adjoin F S) := isField_of_isIntegral_of_isField' (Field.toIsField F)
rw [← ((Algebra.adjoin F S).toIntermediateField' this).eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin F S] <;> rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_algebraic_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra
theorem adjoin_simple_toSubalgebra_of_integral (hα : IsIntegral F α) :
F⟮α⟯.toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F {α} := by
apply adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra
rintro x (rfl : x = α)
rwa [isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_to_subalgebra_of_integral IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_toSubalgebra_of_integral
/-- Characterize `IsSplittingField` with `IntermediateField.adjoin` instead of `Algebra.adjoin`. -/
theorem _root_.isSplittingField_iff_intermediateField {p : F[X]} :
p.IsSplittingField F E ↔ p.Splits (algebraMap F E) ∧ adjoin F (p.rootSet E) = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff,
adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun _ ↦ isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet]
exact ⟨fun ⟨spl, adj⟩ ↦ ⟨spl, adj⟩, fun ⟨spl, adj⟩ ↦ ⟨spl, adj⟩⟩
-- Note: p.Splits (algebraMap F E) also works
theorem isSplittingField_iff {p : F[X]} {K : IntermediateField F E} :
p.IsSplittingField F K ↔ p.Splits (algebraMap F K) ∧ K = adjoin F (p.rootSet E) := by
suffices _ → (Algebra.adjoin F (p.rootSet K) = ⊤ ↔ K = adjoin F (p.rootSet E)) by
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, (this h.1).mp h.2⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, (this h.1).mpr h.2⟩⟩
rw [← toSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff,
adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun x ↦ isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet]
refine fun hp ↦ (adjoin_rootSet_eq_range hp K.val).symm.trans ?_
rw [← K.range_val, eq_comm]
#align intermediate_field.is_splitting_field_iff IntermediateField.isSplittingField_iff
theorem adjoin_rootSet_isSplittingField {p : F[X]} (hp : p.Splits (algebraMap F E)) :
p.IsSplittingField F (adjoin F (p.rootSet E)) :=
isSplittingField_iff.mpr ⟨splits_of_splits hp fun _ hx ↦ subset_adjoin F (p.rootSet E) hx, rfl⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_root_set_is_splitting_field IntermediateField.adjoin_rootSet_isSplittingField
section Supremum
variable {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] (E1 E2 : IntermediateField K L)
theorem le_sup_toSubalgebra : E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra ≤ (E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra :=
sup_le (show E1 ≤ E1 ⊔ E2 from le_sup_left) (show E2 ≤ E1 ⊔ E2 from le_sup_right)
#align intermediate_field.le_sup_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.le_sup_toSubalgebra
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Adjoin.lean | 676 | 684 | theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E2] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra := by |
have : (adjoin E1 (E2 : Set L)).toSubalgebra = _ := adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun x h ↦
IsAlgebraic.tower_top E1 (isAlgebraic_iff.1
(Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic (⟨x, h⟩ : E2)))
apply_fun Subalgebra.restrictScalars K at this
erw [← restrictScalars_toSubalgebra, restrictScalars_adjoin,
Algebra.restrictScalars_adjoin] at this
exact this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.Rat.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.SeqFocus
/-! # Additional lemmas about the Rational Numbers -/
namespace Rat
theorem ext : {p q : Rat} → p.num = q.num → p.den = q.den → p = q
| ⟨_,_,_,_⟩, ⟨_,_,_,_⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_den_one {r : Int} :
⟨r, 1, Nat.one_ne_zero, (Nat.coprime_one_right _)⟩ = (r : Rat) := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_num : (0 : Rat).num = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_den : (0 : Rat).den = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_num : (1 : Rat).num = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_den : (1 : Rat).den = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem maybeNormalize_eq {num den g} (den_nz reduced) :
maybeNormalize num den g den_nz reduced =
{ num := num.div g, den := den / g, den_nz, reduced } := by
unfold maybeNormalize; split
· subst g; simp
· rfl
theorem normalize.reduced' {num : Int} {den g : Nat} (den_nz : den ≠ 0)
(e : g = num.natAbs.gcd den) : (num / g).natAbs.Coprime (den / g) := by
rw [← Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd (e ▸ Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..))]
exact normalize.reduced den_nz e
theorem normalize_eq {num den} (den_nz) : normalize num den den_nz =
{ num := num / num.natAbs.gcd den
den := den / num.natAbs.gcd den
den_nz := normalize.den_nz den_nz rfl
reduced := normalize.reduced' den_nz rfl } := by
simp only [normalize, maybeNormalize_eq,
Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..))]
@[simp] theorem normalize_zero (nz) : normalize 0 d nz = 0 := by
simp [normalize, Int.zero_div, Int.natAbs_zero, Nat.div_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero nz)]; rfl
theorem mk_eq_normalize (num den nz c) : ⟨num, den, nz, c⟩ = normalize num den nz := by
simp [normalize_eq, c.gcd_eq_one]
theorem normalize_self (r : Rat) : normalize r.num r.den r.den_nz = r := (mk_eq_normalize ..).symm
theorem normalize_mul_left {a : Nat} (d0 : d ≠ 0) (a0 : a ≠ 0) :
normalize (↑a * n) (a * d) (Nat.mul_ne_zero a0 d0) = normalize n d d0 := by
simp [normalize_eq, mk'.injEq, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero a0), Int.ofNat_mul,
Int.mul_ediv_mul_of_pos _ _ (Int.ofNat_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero a0)]
theorem normalize_mul_right {a : Nat} (d0 : d ≠ 0) (a0 : a ≠ 0) :
normalize (n * a) (d * a) (Nat.mul_ne_zero d0 a0) = normalize n d d0 := by
rw [← normalize_mul_left (d0 := d0) a0]; congr 1 <;> [apply Int.mul_comm; apply Nat.mul_comm]
theorem normalize_eq_iff (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
normalize n₁ d₁ z₁ = normalize n₂ d₂ z₂ ↔ n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [normalize_eq, mk'.injEq] at h
have' hn₁ := Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left n₁.natAbs d₁
have' hn₂ := Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left n₂.natAbs d₂
have' hd₁ := Int.ofNat_dvd.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_right n₁.natAbs d₁
have' hd₂ := Int.ofNat_dvd.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_right n₂.natAbs d₂
rw [← Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_trans hd₂ (Int.dvd_mul_left ..)),
Int.mul_ediv_assoc _ hd₂, ← Int.ofNat_ediv, ← h.2, Int.ofNat_ediv,
← Int.mul_ediv_assoc _ hd₁, Int.mul_ediv_assoc' _ hn₁,
Int.mul_right_comm, h.1, Int.ediv_mul_cancel hn₂]
· rw [← normalize_mul_right _ z₂, ← normalize_mul_left z₂ z₁, Int.mul_comm d₁, h]
theorem maybeNormalize_eq_normalize {num : Int} {den g : Nat} (den_nz reduced)
(hn : ↑g ∣ num) (hd : g ∣ den) :
maybeNormalize num den g den_nz reduced = normalize num den (mt (by simp [·]) den_nz) := by
simp only [maybeNormalize_eq, mk_eq_normalize, Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd hn]
have : g ≠ 0 := mt (by simp [·]) den_nz
rw [← normalize_mul_right _ this, Int.ediv_mul_cancel hn]
congr 1; exact Nat.div_mul_cancel hd
@[simp] theorem normalize_eq_zero (d0 : d ≠ 0) : normalize n d d0 = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by
have' := normalize_eq_iff d0 Nat.one_ne_zero
rw [normalize_zero (d := 1)] at this; rw [this]; simp
theorem normalize_num_den' (num den nz) : ∃ d : Nat, d ≠ 0 ∧
num = (normalize num den nz).num * d ∧ den = (normalize num den nz).den * d := by
refine ⟨num.natAbs.gcd den, Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right nz, ?_⟩
simp [normalize_eq, Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..),
Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..)]
theorem normalize_num_den (h : normalize n d z = ⟨n', d', z', c⟩) :
∃ m : Nat, m ≠ 0 ∧ n = n' * m ∧ d = d' * m := by
have := normalize_num_den' n d z; rwa [h] at this
theorem normalize_eq_mkRat {num den} (den_nz) : normalize num den den_nz = mkRat num den := by
simp [mkRat, den_nz]
theorem mkRat_num_den (z : d ≠ 0) (h : mkRat n d = ⟨n', d', z', c⟩) :
∃ m : Nat, m ≠ 0 ∧ n = n' * m ∧ d = d' * m :=
normalize_num_den ((normalize_eq_mkRat z).symm ▸ h)
theorem mkRat_def (n d) : mkRat n d = if d0 : d = 0 then 0 else normalize n d d0 := rfl
theorem mkRat_self (a : Rat) : mkRat a.num a.den = a := by
rw [← normalize_eq_mkRat a.den_nz, normalize_self]
theorem mk_eq_mkRat (num den nz c) : ⟨num, den, nz, c⟩ = mkRat num den := by
simp [mk_eq_normalize, normalize_eq_mkRat]
@[simp] theorem zero_mkRat (n) : mkRat 0 n = 0 := by simp [mkRat_def]
@[simp] theorem mkRat_zero (n) : mkRat n 0 = 0 := by simp [mkRat_def]
theorem mkRat_eq_zero (d0 : d ≠ 0) : mkRat n d = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by simp [mkRat_def, d0]
theorem mkRat_ne_zero (d0 : d ≠ 0) : mkRat n d ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 := not_congr (mkRat_eq_zero d0)
theorem mkRat_mul_left {a : Nat} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : mkRat (↑a * n) (a * d) = mkRat n d := by
if d0 : d = 0 then simp [d0] else
rw [← normalize_eq_mkRat d0, ← normalize_mul_left d0 a0, normalize_eq_mkRat]
theorem mkRat_mul_right {a : Nat} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : mkRat (n * a) (d * a) = mkRat n d := by
rw [← mkRat_mul_left (d := d) a0]; congr 1 <;> [apply Int.mul_comm; apply Nat.mul_comm]
theorem mkRat_eq_iff (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
mkRat n₁ d₁ = mkRat n₂ d₂ ↔ n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁ := by
rw [← normalize_eq_mkRat z₁, ← normalize_eq_mkRat z₂, normalize_eq_iff]
@[simp] theorem divInt_ofNat (num den) : num /. (den : Nat) = mkRat num den := by
simp [divInt, normalize_eq_mkRat]
theorem mk_eq_divInt (num den nz c) : ⟨num, den, nz, c⟩ = num /. (den : Nat) := by
simp [mk_eq_mkRat]
theorem divInt_self (a : Rat) : a.num /. a.den = a := by rw [divInt_ofNat, mkRat_self]
@[simp] theorem zero_divInt (n) : 0 /. n = 0 := by cases n <;> simp [divInt]
@[simp] theorem divInt_zero (n) : n /. 0 = 0 := mkRat_zero n
theorem neg_divInt_neg (num den) : -num /. -den = num /. den := by
match den with
| Nat.succ n =>
simp only [divInt, Int.neg_ofNat_succ]
simp [normalize_eq_mkRat, Int.neg_neg]
| 0 => rfl
| Int.negSucc n =>
simp only [divInt, Int.neg_negSucc]
simp [normalize_eq_mkRat, Int.neg_neg]
theorem divInt_neg' (num den) : num /. -den = -num /. den := by rw [← neg_divInt_neg, Int.neg_neg]
theorem divInt_eq_iff (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
n₁ /. d₁ = n₂ /. d₂ ↔ n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁ := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg d₁ with ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg d₂ with ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
simp_all [divInt_neg', Int.ofNat_eq_zero, Int.neg_eq_zero,
mkRat_eq_iff, Int.neg_mul, Int.mul_neg, Int.eq_neg_comm, eq_comm]
theorem divInt_mul_left {a : Int} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (a * n) /. (a * d) = n /. d := by
if d0 : d = 0 then simp [d0] else
simp [divInt_eq_iff (Int.mul_ne_zero a0 d0) d0, Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_left_comm]
theorem divInt_mul_right {a : Int} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (n * a) /. (d * a) = n /. d := by
simp [← divInt_mul_left (d := d) a0, Int.mul_comm]
theorem divInt_num_den (z : d ≠ 0) (h : n /. d = ⟨n', d', z', c⟩) :
∃ m, m ≠ 0 ∧ n = n' * m ∧ d = d' * m := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg d with ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
simp_all [divInt_neg', Int.ofNat_eq_zero, Int.neg_eq_zero]
· have ⟨m, h₁, h₂⟩ := mkRat_num_den z h; exists m
simp [Int.ofNat_eq_zero, Int.ofNat_mul, h₁, h₂]
· have ⟨m, h₁, h₂⟩ := mkRat_num_den z h; exists -m
rw [← Int.neg_inj, Int.neg_neg] at h₂
simp [Int.ofNat_eq_zero, Int.ofNat_mul, h₁, h₂, Int.mul_neg, Int.neg_eq_zero]
@[simp] theorem ofInt_ofNat : ofInt (OfNat.ofNat n) = OfNat.ofNat n := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofInt_num : (ofInt n : Rat).num = n := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofInt_den : (ofInt n : Rat).den = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_num : (OfNat.ofNat n : Rat).num = OfNat.ofNat n := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_den : (OfNat.ofNat n : Rat).den = 1 := rfl
theorem add_def (a b : Rat) :
a + b = normalize (a.num * b.den + b.num * a.den) (a.den * b.den)
(Nat.mul_ne_zero a.den_nz b.den_nz) := by
show Rat.add .. = _; delta Rat.add; dsimp only; split
· exact (normalize_self _).symm
· have : a.den.gcd b.den ≠ 0 := Nat.gcd_ne_zero_left a.den_nz
rw [maybeNormalize_eq_normalize _ _
(Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..)
(Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..) <|
Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..) (Nat.dvd_mul_left ..)),
← normalize_mul_right _ this]; congr 1
· simp only [Int.add_mul, Int.mul_assoc, Int.ofNat_mul_ofNat,
Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..), Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..)]
· rw [Nat.mul_right_comm, Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..)]
theorem add_def' (a b : Rat) : a + b = mkRat (a.num * b.den + b.num * a.den) (a.den * b.den) := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq_mkRat]
theorem normalize_add_normalize (n₁ n₂) {d₁ d₂} (z₁ z₂) :
normalize n₁ d₁ z₁ + normalize n₂ d₂ z₂ =
normalize (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) (d₁ * d₂) (Nat.mul_ne_zero z₁ z₂) := by
cases e₁ : normalize n₁ d₁ z₁; rcases normalize_num_den e₁ with ⟨g₁, zg₁, rfl, rfl⟩
cases e₂ : normalize n₂ d₂ z₂; rcases normalize_num_den e₂ with ⟨g₂, zg₂, rfl, rfl⟩
simp only [add_def]; rw [← normalize_mul_right _ (Nat.mul_ne_zero zg₁ zg₂)]; congr 1
· rw [Int.add_mul]; simp [Int.ofNat_mul, Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_left_comm, Int.mul_comm]
· simp [Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem mkRat_add_mkRat (n₁ n₂ : Int) {d₁ d₂} (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
mkRat n₁ d₁ + mkRat n₂ d₂ = mkRat (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) (d₁ * d₂) := by
rw [← normalize_eq_mkRat z₁, ← normalize_eq_mkRat z₂, normalize_add_normalize, normalize_eq_mkRat]
theorem divInt_add_divInt (n₁ n₂ : Int) {d₁ d₂} (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
n₁ /. d₁ + n₂ /. d₂ = (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) /. (d₁ * d₂) := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg d₁ with ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg d₂ with ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
simp_all [-Int.natCast_mul, Int.ofNat_eq_zero, Int.neg_eq_zero, divInt_neg', Int.mul_neg,
Int.ofNat_mul_ofNat, Int.neg_add, Int.neg_mul, mkRat_add_mkRat]
@[simp] theorem neg_num (a : Rat) : (-a).num = -a.num := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_den (a : Rat) : (-a).den = a.den := rfl
theorem neg_normalize (n d z) : -normalize n d z = normalize (-n) d z := by
simp [normalize]; rfl
theorem neg_mkRat (n d) : -mkRat n d = mkRat (-n) d := by
if z : d = 0 then simp [z]; rfl else simp [← normalize_eq_mkRat z, neg_normalize]
theorem neg_divInt (n d) : -(n /. d) = -n /. d := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg d with ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ <;> simp [divInt_neg', neg_mkRat]
theorem sub_def (a b : Rat) :
a - b = normalize (a.num * b.den - b.num * a.den) (a.den * b.den)
(Nat.mul_ne_zero a.den_nz b.den_nz) := by
show Rat.sub .. = _; delta Rat.sub; dsimp only; split
· exact (normalize_self _).symm
· have : a.den.gcd b.den ≠ 0 := Nat.gcd_ne_zero_left a.den_nz
rw [maybeNormalize_eq_normalize _ _
(Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..)
(Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..) <|
Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..) (Nat.dvd_mul_left ..)),
← normalize_mul_right _ this]; congr 1
· simp only [Int.sub_mul, Int.mul_assoc, Int.ofNat_mul_ofNat,
Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..), Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..)]
· rw [Nat.mul_right_comm, Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..)]
theorem sub_def' (a b : Rat) : a - b = mkRat (a.num * b.den - b.num * a.den) (a.den * b.den) := by
rw [sub_def, normalize_eq_mkRat]
protected theorem sub_eq_add_neg (a b : Rat) : a - b = a + -b := by
simp [add_def, sub_def, Int.neg_mul, Int.sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem divInt_sub_divInt (n₁ n₂ : Int) {d₁ d₂} (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
n₁ /. d₁ - n₂ /. d₂ = (n₁ * d₂ - n₂ * d₁) /. (d₁ * d₂) := by
simp only [Rat.sub_eq_add_neg, neg_divInt,
divInt_add_divInt _ _ z₁ z₂, Int.neg_mul, Int.sub_eq_add_neg]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 264 | 275 | theorem mul_def (a b : Rat) :
a * b = normalize (a.num * b.num) (a.den * b.den) (Nat.mul_ne_zero a.den_nz b.den_nz) := by |
show Rat.mul .. = _; delta Rat.mul; dsimp only
have H1 : a.num.natAbs.gcd b.den ≠ 0 := Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right b.den_nz
have H2 : b.num.natAbs.gcd a.den ≠ 0 := Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right a.den_nz
rw [mk_eq_normalize, ← normalize_mul_right _ (Nat.mul_ne_zero H1 H2)]; congr 1
· rw [Int.ofNat_mul, ← Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_right_comm (Int.div ..),
Int.div_mul_cancel (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..), Int.mul_assoc,
Int.div_mul_cancel (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..)]
· rw [← Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_right_comm, Nat.mul_right_comm (_/_),
Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..), Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
#align_import algebra.big_operators.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Big operators
In this file we define products and sums indexed by finite sets (specifically, `Finset`).
## Notation
We introduce the following notation.
Let `s` be a `Finset α`, and `f : α → β` a function.
* `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f` (assuming `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f` (assuming `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
* `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
## Implementation Notes
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists AddCommMonoidWithOne
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
variable {ι κ α β γ : Type*}
open Fin Function
namespace Finset
/-- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is the product of `f x`
as `x` ranges over the elements of the finite set `s`.
-/
@[to_additive "`∑ x ∈ s, f x` is the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements
of the finite set `s`."]
protected def prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : β :=
(s.1.map f).prod
#align finset.prod Finset.prod
#align finset.sum Finset.sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset α) (hs : s.Nodup) (f : α → β) :
(⟨s, hs⟩ : Finset α).prod f = (s.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_mk Finset.prod_mk
#align finset.sum_mk Finset.sum_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_val [CommMonoid α] (s : Finset α) : s.1.prod = s.prod id := by
rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_val Finset.prod_val
#align finset.sum_val Finset.sum_val
end Finset
library_note "operator precedence of big operators"/--
There is no established mathematical convention
for the operator precedence of big operators like `∏` and `∑`.
We will have to make a choice.
Online discussions, such as https://math.stackexchange.com/q/185538/30839
seem to suggest that `∏` and `∑` should have the same precedence,
and that this should be somewhere between `*` and `+`.
The latter have precedence levels `70` and `65` respectively,
and we therefore choose the level `67`.
In practice, this means that parentheses should be placed as follows:
```lean
∑ k ∈ K, (a k + b k) = ∑ k ∈ K, a k + ∑ k ∈ K, b k →
∏ k ∈ K, a k * b k = (∏ k ∈ K, a k) * (∏ k ∈ K, b k)
```
(Example taken from page 490 of Knuth's *Concrete Mathematics*.)
-/
namespace BigOperators
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder Lean Meta
-- TODO: contribute this modification back to `extBinder`
/-- A `bigOpBinder` is like an `extBinder` and has the form `x`, `x : ty`, or `x pred`
where `pred` is a `binderPred` like `< 2`.
Unlike `extBinder`, `x` is a term. -/
syntax bigOpBinder := term:max ((" : " term) <|> binderPred)?
/-- A BigOperator binder in parentheses -/
syntax bigOpBinderParenthesized := " (" bigOpBinder ")"
/-- A list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinderCollection := bigOpBinderParenthesized+
/-- A single (unparenthesized) binder, or a list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinders := bigOpBinderCollection <|> (ppSpace bigOpBinder)
/-- Collects additional binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinder`.
Note: this is not extensible at the moment, unlike the usual `bigOpBinder` expansions. -/
def processBigOpBinder (processed : (Array (Term × Term)))
(binder : TSyntax ``bigOpBinder) : MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
set_option hygiene false in
withRef binder do
match binder with
| `(bigOpBinder| $x:term) =>
match x with
| `(($a + $b = $n)) => -- Maybe this is too cute.
return processed |>.push (← `(⟨$a, $b⟩), ← `(Finset.Nat.antidiagonal $n))
| _ => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``(Finset.univ))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x : $t) => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``((Finset.univ : Finset $t)))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ∈ $s) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(finset% $s))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x < $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iio $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≤ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iic $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x > $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ioi $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≥ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ici $n))
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collects the binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinders`. -/
def processBigOpBinders (binders : TSyntax ``bigOpBinders) :
MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
match binders with
| `(bigOpBinders| $b:bigOpBinder) => processBigOpBinder #[] b
| `(bigOpBinders| $[($bs:bigOpBinder)]*) => bs.foldlM processBigOpBinder #[]
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collect the binderIdents into a `⟨...⟩` expression. -/
def bigOpBindersPattern (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
let ts := processed.map Prod.fst
if ts.size == 1 then
return ts[0]!
else
`(⟨$ts,*⟩)
/-- Collect the terms into a product of sets. -/
def bigOpBindersProd (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
if processed.isEmpty then
`((Finset.univ : Finset Unit))
else if processed.size == 1 then
return processed[0]!.2
else
processed.foldrM (fun s p => `(SProd.sprod $(s.2) $p)) processed.back.2
(start := processed.size - 1)
/--
- `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∑ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∑ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.sum (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∑ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∑" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigsum) "∑ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
/--
- `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∏ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∏ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.prod (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∏ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∏" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigprod) "∏ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsum)
| `(∑ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.sum (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.sum $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
macro_rules (kind := bigprod)
| `(∏ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.prod (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.prod $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
/-- (Deprecated, use `∑ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∑ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigsumin) "∑ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsumin)
| `(∑ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∑ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
/-- (Deprecated, use `∏ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∏ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigprodin) "∏ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigprodin)
| `(∏ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∏ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
open Lean Meta Parser.Term PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.prod`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the product is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.prod] def delabFinsetProd : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∏ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∏ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.sum`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the sum is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.sum] def delabFinsetSum : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∑ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∑ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
end BigOperators
namespace Finset
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_multiset_prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = (s.1.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod
#align finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_map_val [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.1.map f).prod = ∏ a ∈ s, f a :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_map_val Finset.prod_map_val
#align finset.sum_map_val Finset.sum_map_val
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_fold [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = s.fold ((· * ·) : β → β → β) 1 f :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_fold Finset.prod_eq_fold
#align finset.sum_eq_fold Finset.sum_eq_fold
@[simp]
theorem sum_multiset_singleton (s : Finset α) : (s.sum fun x => {x}) = s.val := by
simp only [sum_eq_multiset_sum, Multiset.sum_map_singleton]
#align finset.sum_multiset_singleton Finset.sum_multiset_singleton
end Finset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_prod [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {G : Type*} [FunLike G β γ] [MonoidHomClass G β γ]
(g : G) (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : g (∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g (f x) := by
simp only [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, map_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align map_prod map_prod
#align map_sum map_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, ⇑(f x) :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.coeFn β γ) _ _
#align monoid_hom.coe_finset_prod MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_finset_sum AddMonoidHom.coe_finset_sum
/-- See also `Finset.prod_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"See also `Finset.sum_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ`"]
theorem MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α)
(b : β) : (∏ x ∈ s, f x) b = ∏ x ∈ s, f x b :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.eval b) _ _
#align monoid_hom.finset_prod_apply MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.finset_sum_apply AddMonoidHom.finset_sum_apply
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_empty : ∏ x ∈ ∅, f x = 1 :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_empty Finset.prod_empty
#align finset.sum_empty Finset.sum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_of_empty Finset.prod_of_empty
#align finset.sum_of_empty Finset.sum_of_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (h : a ∉ s) : ∏ x ∈ cons a s h, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.prod_cons Finset.prod_cons
#align finset.sum_cons Finset.sum_cons
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_insert [DecidableEq α] : a ∉ s → ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_insert
#align finset.prod_insert Finset.prod_insert
#align finset.sum_insert Finset.sum_insert
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
by_cases hm : a ∈ s
· simp_rw [insert_eq_of_mem hm]
· rw [prod_insert hm, h hm, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem Finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem
#align finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_one [DecidableEq α] (h : f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
#align finset.prod_insert_one Finset.prod_insert_one
#align finset.sum_insert_zero Finset.sum_insert_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_insert_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) {f : α → M} :
(∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x) / f a = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ∏ x ∈ singleton a, f x = f a :=
Eq.trans fold_singleton <| mul_one _
#align finset.prod_singleton Finset.prod_singleton
#align finset.sum_singleton Finset.sum_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pair [DecidableEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) :
(∏ x ∈ ({a, b} : Finset α), f x) = f a * f b := by
rw [prod_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_pair Finset.prod_pair
#align finset.sum_pair Finset.sum_pair
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const_one : (∏ _x ∈ s, (1 : β)) = 1 := by
simp only [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_const', Multiset.prod_replicate, one_pow]
#align finset.prod_const_one Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.sum_const_zero Finset.sum_const_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_image [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, g x = g y → x = y) → ∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (g x) :=
fold_image
#align finset.prod_image Finset.prod_image
#align finset.sum_image Finset.sum_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_map (s : Finset α) (e : α ↪ γ) (f : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.map e, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (e x) := by
rw [Finset.prod, Finset.map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_map Finset.prod_map
#align finset.sum_map Finset.sum_map
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_attach (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s.attach, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
classical rw [← prod_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn, attach_image_val]
#align finset.prod_attach Finset.prod_attach
#align finset.sum_attach Finset.sum_attach
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem prod_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) : (∀ x ∈ s₂, f x = g x) → s₁.prod f = s₂.prod g := by
rw [h]; exact fold_congr
#align finset.prod_congr Finset.prod_congr
#align finset.sum_congr Finset.sum_congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_one {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ _x ∈ s, 1 := Finset.prod_congr rfl h
_ = 1 := Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_one Finset.prod_eq_one
#align finset.sum_eq_zero Finset.sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjUnion (h) :
∏ x ∈ s₁.disjUnion s₂ h, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjUnion h)
rw [one_mul]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_union Finset.prod_disjUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_union Finset.sum_disjUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjiUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Finset α) (h) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjiUnion t h, f x = ∏ i ∈ s, ∏ x ∈ t i, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjiUnion h)
dsimp [Finset.prod, Multiset.prod, Multiset.fold, Finset.disjUnion, Finset.fold]
congr
exact prod_const_one.symm
#align finset.prod_disj_Union Finset.prod_disjiUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_Union Finset.sum_disjiUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union_inter [DecidableEq α] :
(∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
fold_union_inter
#align finset.prod_union_inter Finset.prod_union_inter
#align finset.sum_union_inter Finset.sum_union_inter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union [DecidableEq α] (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp h]; exact (mul_one _).symm
#align finset.prod_union Finset.prod_union
#align finset.sum_union Finset.sum_union
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
(s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
have := Classical.decEq α
rw [← prod_union (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s s p), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
#align finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
#align finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not Finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not
section ToList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_to_list (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.toList.map f).prod = s.prod f := by
rw [Finset.prod, ← Multiset.prod_coe, ← Multiset.map_coe, Finset.coe_toList]
#align finset.prod_to_list Finset.prod_to_list
#align finset.sum_to_list Finset.sum_to_list
end ToList
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (prod_map s σ.toEmbedding f).symm
exact (map_perm hs).symm
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp Equiv.Perm.prod_comp
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp Equiv.Perm.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp' (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x) x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x (σ.symm x) := by
convert σ.prod_comp s (fun x => f x (σ.symm x)) hs
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp' Equiv.Perm.prod_comp'
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp' Equiv.Perm.sum_comp'
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_insert [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (insert a s).powerset, f t =
(∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) * ∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f (insert a t) := by
rw [powerset_insert, prod_union, prod_image]
· exact insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn.mono fun t ht ↦ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 ht) ha
· aesop (add simp [disjoint_left, insert_subset_iff])
#align finset.prod_powerset_insert Finset.prod_powerset_insert
#align finset.sum_powerset_insert Finset.sum_powerset_insert
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_cons (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (s.cons a ha).powerset, f t = (∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) *
∏ t ∈ s.powerset.attach, f (cons a t $ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 t.2) ha) := by
classical
simp_rw [cons_eq_insert]
rw [prod_powerset_insert ha, prod_attach _ fun t ↦ f (insert a t)]
/-- A product over `powerset s` is equal to the double product over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over `powerset s` is equal to the double sum over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`"]
lemma prod_powerset (s : Finset α) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ powerset s, f t = ∏ j ∈ range (card s + 1), ∏ t ∈ powersetCard j s, f t := by
rw [powerset_card_disjiUnion, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_powerset Finset.prod_powerset
#align finset.sum_powerset Finset.sum_powerset
end CommMonoid
end Finset
section
open Finset
variable [Fintype α] [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompl.prod_mul_prod {s t : Finset α} (h : IsCompl s t) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ t, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(Finset.prod_disjUnion h.disjoint).symm.trans <| by
classical rw [Finset.disjUnion_eq_union, ← Finset.sup_eq_union, h.sup_eq_top]; rfl
#align is_compl.prod_mul_prod IsCompl.prod_mul_prod
#align is_compl.sum_add_sum IsCompl.sum_add_sum
end
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
/-- Multiplying the products of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole product.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype`. -/
@[to_additive "Adding the sums of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole sum.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype`. "]
theorem prod_mul_prod_compl [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
IsCompl.prod_mul_prod isCompl_compl f
#align finset.prod_mul_prod_compl Finset.prod_mul_prod_compl
#align finset.sum_add_sum_compl Finset.sum_add_sum_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_compl_mul_prod [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i) * ∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(@isCompl_compl _ s _).symm.prod_mul_prod f
#align finset.prod_compl_mul_prod Finset.prod_compl_mul_prod
#align finset.sum_compl_add_sum Finset.sum_compl_add_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
(∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_of_subset h]
#align finset.prod_sdiff Finset.prod_sdiff
#align finset.sum_sdiff Finset.sum_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset_one_on_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, g x = 1)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f x = g x) : ∏ i ∈ s₁, f i = ∏ i ∈ s₂, g i := by
rw [← prod_sdiff h, prod_eq_one hg, one_mul]
exact prod_congr rfl hfg
#align finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
#align finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff Finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ → f x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
prod_subset_one_on_sdiff h (by simpa) fun _ _ => rfl
#align finset.prod_subset Finset.prod_subset
#align finset.sum_subset Finset.sum_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_disj_sum (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : Sum α γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, f x = (∏ x ∈ s, f (Sum.inl x)) * ∏ x ∈ t, f (Sum.inr x) := by
rw [← map_inl_disjUnion_map_inr, prod_disjUnion, prod_map, prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_sum Finset.prod_disj_sum
#align finset.sum_disj_sum Finset.sum_disj_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sum_elim (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : α → β) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, Sum.elim f g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by simp
#align finset.prod_sum_elim Finset.prod_sum_elim
#align finset.sum_sum_elim Finset.sum_sum_elim
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_biUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α}
(hs : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) : ∏ x ∈ s.biUnion t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ i ∈ t x, f i := by
rw [← disjiUnion_eq_biUnion _ _ hs, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_bUnion Finset.prod_biUnion
#align finset.sum_bUnion Finset.sum_biUnion
/-- Product over a sigma type equals the product of fiberwise products. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.prod_sigma'`. -/
@[to_additive "Sum over a sigma type equals the sum of fiberwise sums. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.sum_sigma'`"]
theorem prod_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : Sigma σ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x = ∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f ⟨a, s⟩ := by
simp_rw [← disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk, prod_disjiUnion, prod_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
#align finset.prod_sigma Finset.prod_sigma
#align finset.sum_sigma Finset.sum_sigma
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sigma' {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : ∀ a, σ a → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f a s) = ∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x.1 x.2 :=
Eq.symm <| prod_sigma s t fun x => f x.1 x.2
#align finset.prod_sigma' Finset.prod_sigma'
#align finset.sum_sigma' Finset.sum_sigma'
section bij
variable {ι κ α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α}
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the product, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the sum, rather than being a non-dependent function."]
theorem prod_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
congr_arg Multiset.prod (Multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup f g s.2 t.2 i hi i_inj i_surj h)
#align finset.prod_bij Finset.prod_bij
#align finset.sum_bij Finset.sum_bij
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the products, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather than
as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the sums, rather than being non-dependent functions."]
theorem prod_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, ι) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
refine prod_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩) h
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
#align finset.prod_bij' Finset.prod_bij'
#align finset.sum_bij' Finset.sum_bij'
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the sum."]
lemma prod_nbij (i : ι → κ) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set ι).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set ι).SurjOn i t) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj) h
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the products.
The difference with `Finset.prod_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the products, rather than on the entire types.
-/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the sums.
The difference with `Finset.sum_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the sums, rather than on the entire types."]
lemma prod_nbij' (i : ι → κ) (j : κ → ι) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv h
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_equiv (e : ι ≃ κ) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) (hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := by refine prod_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hfg <;> simp [hst]
#align finset.equiv.prod_comp_finset Finset.prod_equiv
#align finset.equiv.sum_comp_finset Finset.sum_equiv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_bijective (e : ι → κ) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t)
(hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := prod_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst hfg
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_injOn (e : ι → κ) (he : Set.InjOn e s) (hest : Set.MapsTo e s t)
(h' : ∀ i ∈ t, i ∉ e '' s → g i = 1) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ j ∈ t, g j := by
classical
exact (prod_nbij e (fun a ↦ mem_image_of_mem e) he (by simp [Set.surjOn_image]) h).trans <|
prod_subset (image_subset_iff.2 hest) <| by simpa using h'
variable [DecidableEq κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f (g i) :=
prod_congr rfl fun j _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hi).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to h]
#align finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to
#align finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x ↦ g x = y, f (g x) :=
prod_congr rfl fun y _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hx).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to h _
variable [Fintype κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
#align finset.prod_fiberwise Finset.prod_fiberwise
#align finset.sum_fiberwise Finset.sum_fiberwise
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise' (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
end bij
/-- Taking a product over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the product over `Fintype.piFinset t`.
`univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`, but differ
in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`. -/
@[to_additive "Taking a sum over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the sum over
`Fintype.piFinset t`. `univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`,
but differ in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`."]
lemma prod_univ_pi [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {κ : ι → Type*} (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i))
(f : (∀ i ∈ (univ : Finset ι), κ i) → β) :
∏ x ∈ univ.pi t, f x = ∏ x ∈ Fintype.piFinset t, f fun a _ ↦ x a := by
apply prod_nbij' (fun x i ↦ x i $ mem_univ _) (fun x i _ ↦ x i) <;> simp
#align finset.prod_univ_pi Finset.prod_univ_pi
#align finset.sum_univ_pi Finset.sum_univ_pi
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_diag [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α × α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s.diag, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f (i, i) := by
apply prod_nbij' Prod.fst (fun i ↦ (i, i)) <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (c, a) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.1, p.2))
apply prod_equiv (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product Finset.prod_finset_product
#align finset.sum_finset_product Finset.sum_finset_product
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product' (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f c a :=
prod_finset_product r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product' Finset.prod_finset_product'
#align finset.sum_finset_product' Finset.sum_finset_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α × γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (a, c) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.2, p.1))
apply prod_equiv ((Equiv.prodComm _ _).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm) <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right Finset.prod_finset_product_right
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right Finset.sum_finset_product_right
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right' (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α → γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f a c :=
prod_finset_product_right r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right' Finset.prod_finset_product_right'
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right' Finset.sum_finset_product_right'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_image' [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} (h : γ → β)
(eq : ∀ c ∈ s, f (g c) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = g c, h x) :
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, h x :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.image g, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = x, h x :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _x hx =>
let ⟨c, hcs, hc⟩ := mem_image.1 hx
hc ▸ eq c hcs
_ = ∏ x ∈ s, h x := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _x => mem_image_of_mem g) _
#align finset.prod_image' Finset.prod_image'
#align finset.sum_image' Finset.sum_image'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mul_distrib : ∏ x ∈ s, f x * g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]; rfl) fold_op_distrib
#align finset.prod_mul_distrib Finset.prod_mul_distrib
#align finset.sum_add_distrib Finset.sum_add_distrib
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_comm (f g h i : α → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, f a * g a) * ∏ a ∈ s, h a * i a = (∏ a ∈ s, f a * h a) * ∏ a ∈ s, g a * i a := by
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_mul_mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product (s ×ˢ t) s (fun _a => t) fun _p => mem_product
#align finset.prod_product Finset.prod_product
#align finset.sum_product Finset.sum_product
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product`"]
theorem prod_product' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y :=
prod_product
#align finset.prod_product' Finset.prod_product'
#align finset.sum_product' Finset.sum_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product_right {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product_right (s ×ˢ t) t (fun _a => s) fun _p => mem_product.trans and_comm
#align finset.prod_product_right Finset.prod_product_right
#align finset.sum_product_right Finset.sum_product_right
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product_right`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product_right`"]
theorem prod_product_right' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_product_right
#align finset.prod_product_right' Finset.prod_product_right'
#align finset.sum_product_right' Finset.sum_product_right'
/-- Generalization of `Finset.prod_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on the outer
variable. -/
@[to_additive "Generalization of `Finset.sum_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on
the outer variable."]
theorem prod_comm' {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α} {t' : Finset α} {s' : α → Finset γ}
(h : ∀ x y, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t x ↔ x ∈ s' y ∧ y ∈ t') {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t x, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t', ∏ x ∈ s' y, f x y := by
classical
have : ∀ z : γ × α, (z ∈ s.biUnion fun x => (t x).map <| Function.Embedding.sectr x _) ↔
z.1 ∈ s ∧ z.2 ∈ t z.1 := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_map, Function.Embedding.sectr_apply, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right, ← and_assoc]
exact
(prod_finset_product' _ _ _ this).symm.trans
((prod_finset_product_right' _ _ _) fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (this _).trans ((h x y).trans and_comm))
#align finset.prod_comm' Finset.prod_comm'
#align finset.sum_comm' Finset.sum_comm'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_comm {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_comm' fun _ _ => Iff.rfl
#align finset.prod_comm Finset.prod_comm
#align finset.sum_comm Finset.sum_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel [CommMonoid γ] {r : β → γ → Prop} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Finset α}
(h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀ a b c, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (∏ x ∈ s, f x) (∏ x ∈ s, g x) := by
delta Finset.prod
apply Multiset.prod_hom_rel <;> assumption
#align finset.prod_hom_rel Finset.prod_hom_rel
#align finset.sum_hom_rel Finset.sum_hom_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_of_ne {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 → p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
(prod_subset (filter_subset _ _)) fun x => by
classical
rw [not_imp_comm, mem_filter]
exact fun h₁ h₂ => ⟨h₁, by simpa using hp _ h₁ h₂⟩
#align finset.prod_filter_of_ne Finset.prod_filter_of_ne
#align finset.sum_filter_of_ne Finset.sum_filter_of_ne
-- If we use `[DecidableEq β]` here, some rewrites fail because they find a wrong `Decidable`
-- instance first; `{∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)}` doesn't work with `rw ← prod_filter_ne_one`
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_ne_one (s : Finset α) [∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)] :
∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_filter_of_ne fun _ _ => id
#align finset.prod_filter_ne_one Finset.prod_filter_ne_one
#align finset.sum_filter_ne_zero Finset.sum_filter_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α → β) :
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 :=
calc
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s.filter p, if p a then f a else 1 :=
prod_congr rfl fun a h => by rw [if_pos]; simpa using (mem_filter.1 h).2
_ = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 := by
{ refine prod_subset (filter_subset _ s) fun x hs h => ?_
rw [mem_filter, not_and] at h
exact if_neg (by simpa using h hs) }
#align finset.prod_filter Finset.prod_filter
#align finset.sum_filter Finset.sum_filter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h : a ∈ s)
(h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ {a}, f x := by
{ refine (prod_subset ?_ ?_).symm
· intro _ H
rwa [mem_singleton.1 H]
· simpa only [mem_singleton] }
_ = f a := prod_singleton _ _
#align finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1)
(h₁ : a ∉ s → f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
by_cases (prod_eq_single_of_mem a · h₀) fun this =>
(prod_congr rfl fun b hb => h₀ b hb <| by rintro rfl; exact this hb).trans <|
prod_const_one.trans (h₁ this).symm
#align finset.prod_eq_single Finset.prod_eq_single
#align finset.sum_eq_single Finset.sum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_left [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₂, a ∉ s₁ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₁, f a :=
Eq.symm <|
prod_subset subset_union_left fun _a ha ha' ↦ hs _ ((mem_union.1 ha).resolve_left ha') ha'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_right [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₁, a ∉ s₂ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₂, f a := by rw [union_comm, prod_union_eq_left hs]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s)
(hn : a ≠ b) (h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; let s' := ({a, b} : Finset α)
have hu : s' ⊆ s := by
refine insert_subset_iff.mpr ?_
apply And.intro ha
apply singleton_subset_iff.mpr hb
have hf : ∀ c ∈ s, c ∉ s' → f c = 1 := by
intro c hc hcs
apply h₀ c hc
apply not_or.mp
intro hab
apply hcs
rw [mem_insert, mem_singleton]
exact hab
rw [← prod_subset hu hf]
exact Finset.prod_pair hn
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (hn : a ≠ b)
(h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) (ha : a ∉ s → f a = 1) (hb : b ∉ s → f b = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; by_cases h₁ : a ∈ s <;> by_cases h₂ : b ∈ s
· exact prod_eq_mul_of_mem a b h₁ h₂ hn h₀
· rw [hb h₂, mul_one]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem a h₁
exact fun c hc hca => h₀ c hc ⟨hca, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩
· rw [ha h₁, one_mul]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem b h₂
exact fun c hc hcb => h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, hcb⟩
· rw [ha h₁, hb h₂, mul_one]
exact
_root_.trans
(prod_congr rfl fun c hc =>
h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩)
prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_mul Finset.prod_eq_mul
#align finset.sum_eq_add Finset.sum_eq_add
-- Porting note: simpNF linter complains that LHS doesn't simplify, but it does
/-- A product over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)
"A sum over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`."]
theorem prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x := by
conv_lhs => erw [← prod_map (s.subtype p) (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f]
exact prod_congr (subtype_map _) fun x _hx => rfl
#align finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter
/-- If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a product
over `s.subtype p` equals that product over `s`. -/
@[to_additive "If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a sum
over `s.subtype p` equals that sum over `s`."]
theorem prod_subtype_of_mem (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter, filter_true_of_mem]
simpa using h
#align finset.prod_subtype_of_mem Finset.prod_subtype_of_mem
#align finset.sum_subtype_of_mem Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem
/-- A product of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
product in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
sum in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`."]
theorem prod_subtype_map_embedding {p : α → Prop} {s : Finset { x // p x }} {f : { x // p x } → β}
{g : α → β} (h : ∀ x : { x // p x }, x ∈ s → g x = f x) :
(∏ x ∈ s.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [Finset.prod_map]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl h
#align finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding Finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding
#align finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding
variable (f s)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort_eq_attach (f : s → β) : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.attach, f i :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach
#align finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := prod_attach _ _
#align finset.prod_coe_sort Finset.prod_coe_sort
#align finset.sum_coe_sort Finset.sum_coe_sort
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_coe (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (∏ i : (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_coe_sort s f
#align finset.prod_finset_coe Finset.prod_finset_coe
#align finset.sum_finset_coe Finset.sum_finset_coe
variable {f s}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtype {p : α → Prop} {F : Fintype (Subtype p)} (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
(f : α → β) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a : Subtype p, f a := by
have : (· ∈ s) = p := Set.ext h
subst p
rw [← prod_coe_sort]
congr!
#align finset.prod_subtype Finset.prod_subtype
#align finset.sum_subtype Finset.sum_subtype
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage' (f : ι → κ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f)] (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter (· ∈ Set.range f), g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ preimage s f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ image f (preimage s f hf), g x :=
Eq.symm <| prod_image <| by simpa only [mem_preimage, Set.InjOn] using hf
_ = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => x ∈ Set.range f, g x := by rw [image_preimage]
#align finset.prod_preimage' Finset.prod_preimage'
#align finset.sum_preimage' Finset.sum_preimage'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∉ Set.range f → g x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
classical rw [prod_preimage', prod_filter_of_ne]; exact fun x hx ↦ Not.imp_symm (hg x hx)
#align finset.prod_preimage Finset.prod_preimage
#align finset.sum_preimage Finset.sum_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage_of_bij (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf.injOn, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
prod_preimage _ _ hf.injOn g fun _ hs h_f ↦ (h_f <| hf.subset_range hs).elim
#align finset.prod_preimage_of_bij Finset.prod_preimage_of_bij
#align finset.sum_preimage_of_bij Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_set_coe (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : (∏ i : s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
(Finset.prod_subtype s.toFinset (fun _ ↦ Set.mem_toFinset) f).symm
/-- The product of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the product of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 1` off `s`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the sum of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 0` off `s`."]
theorem prod_congr_set {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {β : Type*} [Fintype β] (s : Set β)
[DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (f : β → α) (g : s → α) (w : ∀ (x : β) (h : x ∈ s), f x = g ⟨x, h⟩)
(w' : ∀ x : β, x ∉ s → f x = 1) : Finset.univ.prod f = Finset.univ.prod g := by
rw [← @Finset.prod_subset _ _ s.toFinset Finset.univ f _ (by simp)]
· rw [Finset.prod_subtype]
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
exact fun ⟨x, h⟩ _ => w x h
· simp
· rintro x _ h
exact w' x (by simpa using h)
#align finset.prod_congr_set Finset.prod_congr_set
#align finset.sum_congr_set Finset.sum_congr_set
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p}
[DecidablePred fun x => ¬p x] (f : ∀ x : α, p x → γ) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → γ) (h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
calc
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) *
∏ x ∈ s.filter (¬p ·), h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) :=
(prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s p _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ _).symm (prod_attach _ _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_congr rfl fun x _hx ↦
congr_arg h (dif_pos <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
(prod_congr rfl fun x _hx => congr_arg h (dif_neg <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
#align finset.prod_apply_dite Finset.prod_apply_dite
#align finset.sum_apply_dite Finset.sum_apply_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {_hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ)
(h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if p x then f x else g x)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (f x)) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, h (g x) :=
(prod_apply_dite _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ (h ∘ f)) (prod_attach _ (h ∘ g))
#align finset.prod_apply_ite Finset.prod_apply_ite
#align finset.sum_apply_ite Finset.sum_apply_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f : ∀ x : α, p x → β)
(g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, f x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, g x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) := by
simp [prod_apply_dite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_dite Finset.prod_dite
#align finset.sum_dite Finset.sum_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, g x := by
simp [prod_apply_ite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_ite Finset.prod_ite
#align finset.sum_ite Finset.sum_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
rw [prod_ite, filter_false_of_mem, filter_true_of_mem]
· simp only [prod_empty, one_mul]
all_goals intros; apply h; assumption
#align finset.prod_ite_of_false Finset.prod_ite_of_false
#align finset.sum_ite_of_false Finset.sum_ite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
simp_rw [← ite_not (p _)]
apply prod_ite_of_false
simpa
#align finset.prod_ite_of_true Finset.prod_ite_of_true
#align finset.sum_ite_of_true Finset.sum_ite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ) (k : γ → β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) : (∏ x ∈ s, k (if p x then f x else g x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, k (g x) := by
simp_rw [apply_ite k]
exact prod_ite_of_false _ _ h
#align finset.prod_apply_ite_of_false Finset.prod_apply_ite_of_false
#align finset.sum_apply_ite_of_false Finset.sum_apply_ite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ) (k : γ → β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : (∏ x ∈ s, k (if p x then f x else g x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, k (f x) := by
simp_rw [apply_ite k]
exact prod_ite_of_true _ _ h
#align finset.prod_apply_ite_of_true Finset.prod_apply_ite_of_true
#align finset.sum_apply_ite_of_true Finset.sum_apply_ite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_extend_by_one [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (if i ∈ s then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _i hi => if_pos hi
#align finset.prod_extend_by_one Finset.prod_extend_by_one
#align finset.sum_extend_by_zero Finset.sum_extend_by_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_mem [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (if i ∈ t then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i := by
rw [← Finset.prod_filter, Finset.filter_mem_eq_inter]
#align finset.prod_ite_mem Finset.prod_ite_mem
#align finset.sum_ite_mem Finset.sum_ite_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : ∀ x : α, a = x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : a = x then b x h else 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl]
· intros _ _ h
rw [dif_neg]
exact h.symm
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_one]
intros
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
contradiction
#align finset.prod_dite_eq Finset.prod_dite_eq
#align finset.sum_dite_eq Finset.sum_dite_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : ∀ x : α, x = a → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : x = a then b x h else 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl]
· intros _ _ h
rw [dif_neg]
exact h
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_one]
intros
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
contradiction
#align finset.prod_dite_eq' Finset.prod_dite_eq'
#align finset.sum_dite_eq' Finset.sum_dite_eq'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, ite (a = x) (b x) 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq s a fun x _ => b x
#align finset.prod_ite_eq Finset.prod_ite_eq
#align finset.sum_ite_eq Finset.sum_ite_eq
/-- A product taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality test on the index and whose
alternative is `1` has value either the term at that index or `1`.
The difference with `Finset.prod_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `Eq` are swapped. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "A sum taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality
test on the index and whose alternative is `0` has value either the term at that index or `0`.
The difference with `Finset.sum_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `Eq` are swapped."]
theorem prod_ite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, ite (x = a) (b x) 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' s a fun x _ => b x
#align finset.prod_ite_eq' Finset.prod_ite_eq'
#align finset.sum_ite_eq' Finset.sum_ite_eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_index (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ if p then s else t, f x = if p then ∏ x ∈ s, f x else ∏ x ∈ t, f x :=
apply_ite (fun s => ∏ x ∈ s, f x) _ _ _
#align finset.prod_ite_index Finset.prod_ite_index
#align finset.sum_ite_index Finset.sum_ite_index
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_irrel (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : Finset α) (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p then f x else g x) = if p then ∏ x ∈ s, f x else ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
split_ifs with h <;> rfl
#align finset.prod_ite_irrel Finset.prod_ite_irrel
#align finset.sum_ite_irrel Finset.sum_ite_irrel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_irrel (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : Finset α) (f : p → α → β) (g : ¬p → α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : p then f h x else g h x) =
if h : p then ∏ x ∈ s, f h x else ∏ x ∈ s, g h x := by
split_ifs with h <;> rfl
#align finset.prod_dite_irrel Finset.prod_dite_irrel
#align finset.sum_dite_irrel Finset.sum_dite_irrel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_pi_mulSingle' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (x : β) (s : Finset α) :
∏ a' ∈ s, Pi.mulSingle a x a' = if a ∈ s then x else 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' _ _ _
#align finset.prod_pi_mul_single' Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle'
#align finset.sum_pi_single' Finset.sum_pi_single'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_pi_mulSingle {β : α → Type*} [DecidableEq α] [∀ a, CommMonoid (β a)] (a : α)
(f : ∀ a, β a) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ a' ∈ s, Pi.mulSingle a' (f a') a) = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 :=
prod_dite_eq _ _ _
#align finset.prod_pi_mul_single Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α → β) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ s, mulSupport (f i) := by
simp only [mulSupport_subset_iff', Set.mem_iUnion, not_exists, nmem_mulSupport]
exact fun x ↦ prod_eq_one
#align function.mul_support_prod Finset.mulSupport_prod
#align function.support_sum Finset.support_sum
section indicator
open Set
variable {κ : Type*}
/-- Consider a product of `g i (f i)` over a finset. Suppose `g` is a function such as
`n ↦ (· ^ n)`, which maps a second argument of `1` to `1`. Then if `f` is replaced by the
corresponding multiplicative indicator function, the finset may be replaced by a possibly larger
finset without changing the value of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Consider a sum of `g i (f i)` over a finset. Suppose `g` is a function such as
`n ↦ (n • ·)`, which maps a second argument of `0` to `0` (or a weighted sum of `f i * h i` or
`f i • h i`, where `f` gives the weights that are multiplied by some other function `h`). Then if
`f` is replaced by the corresponding indicator function, the finset may be replaced by a possibly
larger finset without changing the value of the sum."]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one [One α] (f : ι → α) (g : ι → α → β) {s t : Finset ι}
(h : s ⊆ t) (hg : ∀ a, g a 1 = 1) :
∏ i ∈ t, g i (mulIndicator ↑s f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, g i (f i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ i ∈ s, g i (mulIndicator ↑s f i) := by rw [prod_subset h fun i _ hn ↦ by simp [hn, hg]]
-- Porting note: This did not use to need the implicit argument
_ = _ := prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ congr_arg _ <| mulIndicator_of_mem (α := ι) hi f
#align set.prod_mul_indicator_subset_of_eq_one Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one
#align set.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero Finset.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero
/-- Taking the product of an indicator function over a possibly larger finset is the same as
taking the original function over the original finset. -/
@[to_additive "Summing an indicator function over a possibly larger `Finset` is the same as summing
the original function over the original finset."]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_subset (f : ι → β) {s t : Finset ι} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∏ i ∈ t, mulIndicator (↑s) f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one _ (fun _ ↦ id) h fun _ ↦ rfl
#align set.prod_mul_indicator_subset Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset
#align set.sum_indicator_subset Finset.sum_indicator_subset
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → κ → β) (t : ι → Set κ) (g : ι → κ)
[DecidablePred fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i] :
∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) (f i) (g i) = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i, f i (g i) := by
refine (prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s (fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i) _).symm.trans <|
Eq.trans (congr_arg₂ (· * ·) ?_ ?_) (mul_one _)
· exact prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ mulIndicator_of_mem (mem_filter.1 hx).2 _
· exact prod_eq_one fun x hx ↦ mulIndicator_of_not_mem (mem_filter.1 hx).2 _
#align finset.prod_mul_indicator_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_inter [DecidableEq ι] (s t : Finset ι) (f : ι → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (t : Set ι).mulIndicator f i = ∏ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i := by
rw [← filter_mem_eq_inter, prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter]; rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_prod (s : Finset ι) (t : Set κ) (f : ι → κ → β) :
mulIndicator t (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator t (f i) :=
map_prod (mulIndicatorHom _ _) _ _
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_prod Finset.mulIndicator_prod
#align set.indicator_finset_sum Finset.indicator_sum
variable {κ : Type*}
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_biUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set κ) {f : κ → β} :
((s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint t) →
mulIndicator (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) f = fun a ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) f a := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s (by simp) fun i s hi ih hs ↦ funext fun j ↦ ?_
rw [prod_insert hi, set_biUnion_insert, mulIndicator_union_of_not_mem_inter,
ih (hs.subset <| subset_insert _ _)]
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, not_and]
exact fun hji i' hi' hji' ↦ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi' hi).symm <|
hs.elim_set (mem_insert_self _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem hi') _ hji hji'
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_bUnion Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion
#align set.indicator_finset_bUnion Finset.indicator_biUnion
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_biUnion_apply (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set κ) {f : κ → β}
(h : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint t) (x : κ) :
mulIndicator (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) f x = ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) f x := by
rw [mulIndicator_biUnion s t h]
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_bUnion_apply Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion_apply
#align set.indicator_finset_bUnion_apply Finset.indicator_biUnion_apply
end indicator
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_bij_ne_one {s : Finset α} {t : Finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 1 → γ) (hi : ∀ a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂, i a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ = i a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, g b ≠ 1 → ∃ a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ = b) (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a = g (i a h₁ h₂)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x := by rw [prod_filter_ne_one]
_ = ∏ x ∈ t.filter fun x => g x ≠ 1, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a ha => i a (mem_filter.mp ha).1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp ha).2)
?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
_ = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := prod_filter_ne_one _
· intros a ha
refine (mem_filter.mp ha).elim ?_
intros h₁ h₂
refine (mem_filter.mpr ⟨hi a h₁ _, ?_⟩)
specialize h a h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
rwa [← h]
· intros a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂
refine (mem_filter.mp ha₁).elim fun _ha₁₁ _ha₁₂ ↦ ?_
refine (mem_filter.mp ha₂).elim fun _ha₂₁ _ha₂₂ ↦ ?_
apply i_inj
· intros b hb
refine (mem_filter.mp hb).elim fun h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂, eq⟩ := i_surj b h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
exact ⟨a, mem_filter.mpr ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, eq⟩
· refine (fun a ha => (mem_filter.mp ha).elim fun h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_)
exact h a h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
#align finset.prod_bij_ne_one Finset.prod_bij_ne_one
#align finset.sum_bij_ne_zero Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x)
(f : ∀ x : α, p x → β) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) = ∏ x : s, g x.val (h x.val x.property) := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x hx => ⟨x, hx⟩) (fun x _ ↦ x) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finset.prod_dite_of_false Finset.prod_dite_of_false
#align finset.sum_dite_of_false Finset.sum_dite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(f : ∀ x : α, p x → β) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) = ∏ x : s, f x.val (h x.val x.property) := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x hx => ⟨x, hx⟩) (fun x _ ↦ x) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finset.prod_dite_of_true Finset.prod_dite_of_true
#align finset.sum_dite_of_true Finset.sum_dite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem nonempty_of_prod_ne_one (h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun H => False.elim <| h <| H.symm ▸ prod_empty) id
#align finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one Finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one
#align finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero Finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one (h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1) : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 1 := by
classical
rw [← prod_filter_ne_one] at h
rcases nonempty_of_prod_ne_one h with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, (mem_filter.1 hx).1, by simpa using (mem_filter.1 hx).2⟩
#align finset.exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one Finset.exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one
#align finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero Finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ_comm (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + 1), f x) = f n * ∏ x ∈ range n, f x := by
rw [range_succ, prod_insert not_mem_range_self]
#align finset.prod_range_succ_comm Finset.prod_range_succ_comm
#align finset.sum_range_succ_comm Finset.sum_range_succ_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + 1), f x) = (∏ x ∈ range n, f x) * f n := by
simp only [mul_comm, prod_range_succ_comm]
#align finset.prod_range_succ Finset.prod_range_succ
#align finset.sum_range_succ Finset.sum_range_succ
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ' (f : ℕ → β) :
∀ n : ℕ, (∏ k ∈ range (n + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ range n, f (k + 1)) * f 0
| 0 => prod_range_succ _ _
| n + 1 => by rw [prod_range_succ _ n, mul_right_comm, ← prod_range_succ' _ n, prod_range_succ]
#align finset.prod_range_succ' Finset.prod_range_succ'
#align finset.sum_range_succ' Finset.sum_range_succ'
@[to_additive]
theorem eventually_constant_prod {u : ℕ → β} {N : ℕ} (hu : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : N ≤ n) :
(∏ k ∈ range n, u k) = ∏ k ∈ range N, u k := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl : n = N + m⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hn
clear hn
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· simp [← add_assoc, prod_range_succ, hm, hu]
#align finset.eventually_constant_prod Finset.eventually_constant_prod
#align finset.eventually_constant_sum Finset.eventually_constant_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_add (f : ℕ → β) (n m : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + m), f x) = (∏ x ∈ range n, f x) * ∏ x ∈ range m, f (n + x) := by
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· erw [Nat.add_succ, prod_range_succ, prod_range_succ, hm, mul_assoc]
#align finset.prod_range_add Finset.prod_range_add
#align finset.sum_range_add Finset.sum_range_add
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_add_div_prod_range {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] (f : ℕ → α) (n m : ℕ) :
(∏ k ∈ range (n + m), f k) / ∏ k ∈ range n, f k = ∏ k ∈ Finset.range m, f (n + k) :=
div_eq_of_eq_mul' (prod_range_add f n m)
#align finset.prod_range_add_div_prod_range Finset.prod_range_add_div_prod_range
#align finset.sum_range_add_sub_sum_range Finset.sum_range_add_sub_sum_range
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_zero (f : ℕ → β) : ∏ k ∈ range 0, f k = 1 := by rw [range_zero, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_range_zero Finset.prod_range_zero
#align finset.sum_range_zero Finset.sum_range_zero
@[to_additive sum_range_one]
theorem prod_range_one (f : ℕ → β) : ∏ k ∈ range 1, f k = f 0 := by
rw [range_one, prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_range_one Finset.prod_range_one
#align finset.sum_range_one Finset.sum_range_one
open List
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/Finset.lean | 1,575 | 1,590 | theorem prod_list_map_count [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) :
(l.map f).prod = ∏ m ∈ l.toFinset, f m ^ l.count m := by |
induction' l with a s IH; · simp only [map_nil, prod_nil, count_nil, pow_zero, prod_const_one]
simp only [List.map, List.prod_cons, toFinset_cons, IH]
by_cases has : a ∈ s.toFinset
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_erase has, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ← mul_assoc, count_cons_self, pow_succ']
congr 1
refine prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [count_cons_of_ne (ne_of_mem_erase hx)]
rw [prod_insert has, count_cons_self, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt mem_toFinset.2 has), pow_one]
congr 1
refine prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [count_cons_of_ne]
rintro rfl
exact has hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.integral.interval_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Integral over an interval
In this file we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ` if `a ≤ b` and
`-∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ` if `b ≤ a`.
## Implementation notes
### Avoiding `if`, `min`, and `max`
In order to avoid `if`s in the definition, we define `IntervalIntegrable f μ a b` as
`integrable_on f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ integrable_on f (Ioc b a) μ`. For any `a`, `b` one of these
intervals is empty and the other coincides with `Set.uIoc a b = Set.Ioc (min a b) (max a b)`.
Similarly, we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`.
Again, for any `a`, `b` one of these integrals is zero, and the other gives the expected result.
This way some properties can be translated from integrals over sets without dealing with
the cases `a ≤ b` and `b ≤ a` separately.
### Choice of the interval
We use integral over `Set.uIoc a b = Set.Ioc (min a b) (max a b)` instead of one of the other
three possible intervals with the same endpoints for two reasons:
* this way `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ` holds whenever
`f` is integrable on each interval; in particular, it works even if the measure `μ` has an atom
at `b`; this rules out `Set.Ioo` and `Set.Icc` intervals;
* with this definition for a probability measure `μ`, the integral `∫ x in a..b, 1 ∂μ` equals
the difference $F_μ(b)-F_μ(a)$, where $F_μ(a)=μ(-∞, a]$ is the
[cumulative distribution function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_function)
of `μ`.
## Tags
integral
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory Set Filter Function
open scoped Classical Topology Filter ENNReal Interval NNReal
variable {ι 𝕜 E F A : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-!
### Integrability on an interval
-/
/-- A function `f` is called *interval integrable* with respect to a measure `μ` on an unordered
interval `a..b` if it is integrable on both intervals `(a, b]` and `(b, a]`. One of these
intervals is always empty, so this property is equivalent to `f` being integrable on
`(min a b, max a b]`. -/
def IntervalIntegrable (f : ℝ → E) (μ : Measure ℝ) (a b : ℝ) : Prop :=
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ IntegrableOn f (Ioc b a) μ
#align interval_integrable IntervalIntegrable
/-!
## Basic iff's for `IntervalIntegrable`
-/
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
/-- A function is interval integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` on `a..b` if and
only if it is integrable on `uIoc a b` with respect to `μ`. This is an equivalent
definition of `IntervalIntegrable`. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ := by
rw [uIoc_eq_union, integrableOn_union, IntervalIntegrable]
#align interval_integrable_iff intervalIntegrable_iff
/-- If a function is interval integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` on `a..b` then
it is integrable on `uIoc a b` with respect to `μ`. -/
theorem IntervalIntegrable.def' (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.mp h
#align interval_integrable.def IntervalIntegrable.def'
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc_of_le hab]
#align interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Ioc_of_le intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff' [NoAtoms μ] :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (uIcc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, ← Icc_min_max, uIoc, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
#align interval_integrable_iff' intervalIntegrable_iff'
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b)
{μ : Measure ℝ} [NoAtoms μ] : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
#align interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Icc_of_le intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ico_of_le [NoAtoms μ] (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico]
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le [NoAtoms μ] (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo]
/-- If a function is integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` then it is interval integrable
with respect to `μ` on `uIcc a b`. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.Integrable.intervalIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
⟨hf.integrableOn, hf.integrableOn⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.interval_integrable MeasureTheory.Integrable.intervalIntegrable
theorem MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.intervalIntegrable (hf : IntegrableOn f [[a, b]] μ) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
⟨MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.mono_set hf (Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_uIcc),
MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.mono_set hf (Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_uIcc')⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_on.interval_integrable MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem intervalIntegrable_const_iff {c : E} :
IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ a b ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ (Ι a b) < ∞ := by
simp only [intervalIntegrable_iff, integrableOn_const]
#align interval_integrable_const_iff intervalIntegrable_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {c : E} :
IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ a b :=
intervalIntegrable_const_iff.2 <| Or.inr measure_Ioc_lt_top
#align interval_integrable_const intervalIntegrable_const
end
/-!
## Basic properties of interval integrability
- interval integrability is symmetric, reflexive, transitive
- monotonicity and strong measurability of the interval integral
- if `f` is interval integrable, so are its absolute value and norm
- arithmetic properties
-/
namespace IntervalIntegrable
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b c d : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure ℝ}
@[symm]
nonrec theorem symm (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable f μ b a :=
h.symm
#align interval_integrable.symm IntervalIntegrable.symm
@[refl, simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem refl : IntervalIntegrable f μ a a := by constructor <;> simp
#align interval_integrable.refl IntervalIntegrable.refl
@[trans]
theorem trans {a b c : ℝ} (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hbc : IntervalIntegrable f μ b c) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a c :=
⟨(hab.1.union hbc.1).mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioc_union_Ioc,
(hbc.2.union hab.2).mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioc_union_Ioc⟩
#align interval_integrable.trans IntervalIntegrable.trans
theorem trans_iterate_Ico {a : ℕ → ℝ} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(hint : ∀ k ∈ Ico m n, IntervalIntegrable f μ (a k) (a <| k + 1)) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ (a m) (a n) := by
revert hint
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n hmn
· simp
· intro p hp IH h
exact (IH fun k hk => h k (Ico_subset_Ico_right p.le_succ hk)).trans (h p (by simp [hp]))
#align interval_integrable.trans_iterate_Ico IntervalIntegrable.trans_iterate_Ico
theorem trans_iterate {a : ℕ → ℝ} {n : ℕ}
(hint : ∀ k < n, IntervalIntegrable f μ (a k) (a <| k + 1)) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ (a 0) (a n) :=
trans_iterate_Ico bot_le fun k hk => hint k hk.2
#align interval_integrable.trans_iterate IntervalIntegrable.trans_iterate
theorem neg (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable (-f) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.neg, h.2.neg⟩
#align interval_integrable.neg IntervalIntegrable.neg
theorem norm (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => ‖f x‖) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.norm, h.2.norm⟩
#align interval_integrable.norm IntervalIntegrable.norm
theorem intervalIntegrable_norm_iff {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ι a b))) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun t => ‖f t‖) μ a b ↔ IntervalIntegrable f μ a b := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, IntegrableOn]; exact integrable_norm_iff hf
#align interval_integrable.interval_integrable_norm_iff IntervalIntegrable.intervalIntegrable_norm_iff
theorem abs {f : ℝ → ℝ} (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => |f x|) μ a b :=
h.norm
#align interval_integrable.abs IntervalIntegrable.abs
theorem mono (hf : IntervalIntegrable f ν a b) (h1 : [[c, d]] ⊆ [[a, b]]) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ c d :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.mpr <| hf.def'.mono (uIoc_subset_uIoc_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc h1) h2
#align interval_integrable.mono IntervalIntegrable.mono
theorem mono_measure (hf : IntervalIntegrable f ν a b) (h : μ ≤ ν) : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
hf.mono Subset.rfl h
#align interval_integrable.mono_measure IntervalIntegrable.mono_measure
theorem mono_set (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (h : [[c, d]] ⊆ [[a, b]]) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ c d :=
hf.mono h le_rfl
#align interval_integrable.mono_set IntervalIntegrable.mono_set
theorem mono_set_ae (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (h : Ι c d ≤ᵐ[μ] Ι a b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ c d :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.mpr <| hf.def'.mono_set_ae h
#align interval_integrable.mono_set_ae IntervalIntegrable.mono_set_ae
theorem mono_set' (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hsub : Ι c d ⊆ Ι a b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ c d :=
hf.mono_set_ae <| eventually_of_forall hsub
#align interval_integrable.mono_set' IntervalIntegrable.mono_set'
theorem mono_fun [NormedAddCommGroup F] {g : ℝ → F} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable g (μ.restrict (Ι a b)))
(hle : (fun x => ‖g x‖) ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ι a b)] fun x => ‖f x‖) : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.2 <| hf.def'.integrable.mono hgm hle
#align interval_integrable.mono_fun IntervalIntegrable.mono_fun
theorem mono_fun' {g : ℝ → ℝ} (hg : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ι a b)))
(hle : (fun x => ‖f x‖) ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ι a b)] g) : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.2 <| hg.def'.integrable.mono' hfm hle
#align interval_integrable.mono_fun' IntervalIntegrable.mono_fun'
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ioc a b)) :=
h.1.aestronglyMeasurable
#align interval_integrable.ae_strongly_measurable IntervalIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable' (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ioc b a)) :=
h.2.aestronglyMeasurable
#align interval_integrable.ae_strongly_measurable' IntervalIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable'
end
variable [NormedRing A] {f g : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
theorem smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
(h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (r : 𝕜) : IntervalIntegrable (r • f) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.smul r, h.2.smul r⟩
#align interval_integrable.smul IntervalIntegrable.smul
@[simp]
theorem add (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hg : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x + g x) μ a b :=
⟨hf.1.add hg.1, hf.2.add hg.2⟩
#align interval_integrable.add IntervalIntegrable.add
@[simp]
theorem sub (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hg : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x - g x) μ a b :=
⟨hf.1.sub hg.1, hf.2.sub hg.2⟩
#align interval_integrable.sub IntervalIntegrable.sub
theorem sum (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → ℝ → E} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IntervalIntegrable (f i) μ a b) :
IntervalIntegrable (∑ i ∈ s, f i) μ a b :=
⟨integrable_finset_sum' s fun i hi => (h i hi).1, integrable_finset_sum' s fun i hi => (h i hi).2⟩
#align interval_integrable.sum IntervalIntegrable.sum
theorem mul_continuousOn {f g : ℝ → A} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hg : ContinuousOn g [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x * g x) μ a b := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mul_continuousOn_of_subset hg measurableSet_Ioc isCompact_uIcc Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align interval_integrable.mul_continuous_on IntervalIntegrable.mul_continuousOn
theorem continuousOn_mul {f g : ℝ → A} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hg : ContinuousOn g [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => g x * f x) μ a b := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff] at hf ⊢
exact hf.continuousOn_mul_of_subset hg isCompact_uIcc measurableSet_Ioc Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align interval_integrable.continuous_on_mul IntervalIntegrable.continuousOn_mul
@[simp]
theorem const_mul {f : ℝ → A} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (c : A) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => c * f x) μ a b :=
hf.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_const
#align interval_integrable.const_mul IntervalIntegrable.const_mul
@[simp]
theorem mul_const {f : ℝ → A} (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (c : A) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x * c) μ a b :=
hf.mul_continuousOn continuousOn_const
#align interval_integrable.mul_const IntervalIntegrable.mul_const
@[simp]
theorem div_const {𝕜 : Type*} {f : ℝ → 𝕜} [NormedField 𝕜] (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(c : 𝕜) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f x / c) μ a b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_const h c⁻¹
#align interval_integrable.div_const IntervalIntegrable.div_const
theorem comp_mul_left (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (c * x)) volume (a / c) (b / c) := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (hc | hc); · rw [hc]; simp
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff'] at hf ⊢
have A : MeasurableEmbedding fun x => x * c⁻¹ :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight₀ _ (inv_ne_zero hc)).closedEmbedding.measurableEmbedding
rw [← Real.smul_map_volume_mul_right (inv_ne_zero hc), IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_smul,
integrable_smul_measure (by simpa : ENNReal.ofReal |c⁻¹| ≠ 0) ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top,
← IntegrableOn, MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_map_iff A]
convert hf using 1
· ext; simp only [comp_apply]; congr 1; field_simp
· rw [preimage_mul_const_uIcc (inv_ne_zero hc)]; field_simp [hc]
#align interval_integrable.comp_mul_left IntervalIntegrable.comp_mul_left
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem comp_mul_left_iff {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x ↦ f (c * x)) volume (a / c) (b / c) ↔
IntervalIntegrable f volume a b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa [hc] using h.comp_mul_left c⁻¹, (comp_mul_left · c)⟩
theorem comp_mul_right (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (x * c)) volume (a / c) (b / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using comp_mul_left hf c
#align interval_integrable.comp_mul_right IntervalIntegrable.comp_mul_right
theorem comp_add_right (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (x + c)) volume (a - c) (b - c) := by
wlog h : a ≤ b generalizing a b
· exact IntervalIntegrable.symm (this hf.symm (le_of_not_le h))
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff'] at hf ⊢
have A : MeasurableEmbedding fun x => x + c :=
(Homeomorph.addRight c).closedEmbedding.measurableEmbedding
rw [← map_add_right_eq_self volume c] at hf
convert (MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_map_iff A).mp hf using 1
rw [preimage_add_const_uIcc]
#align interval_integrable.comp_add_right IntervalIntegrable.comp_add_right
theorem comp_add_left (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (c + x)) volume (a - c) (b - c) := by
simpa only [add_comm] using IntervalIntegrable.comp_add_right hf c
#align interval_integrable.comp_add_left IntervalIntegrable.comp_add_left
theorem comp_sub_right (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (x - c)) volume (a + c) (b + c) := by
simpa only [sub_neg_eq_add] using IntervalIntegrable.comp_add_right hf (-c)
#align interval_integrable.comp_sub_right IntervalIntegrable.comp_sub_right
theorem iff_comp_neg :
IntervalIntegrable f volume a b ↔ IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (-x)) volume (-a) (-b) := by
rw [← comp_mul_left_iff (neg_ne_zero.2 one_ne_zero)]; simp [div_neg]
#align interval_integrable.iff_comp_neg IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg
theorem comp_sub_left (hf : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b) (c : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => f (c - x)) volume (c - a) (c - b) := by
simpa only [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_add_neg] using iff_comp_neg.mp (hf.comp_add_left c)
#align interval_integrable.comp_sub_left IntervalIntegrable.comp_sub_left
end IntervalIntegrable
/-!
## Continuous functions are interval integrable
-/
section
variable {μ : Measure ℝ} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
theorem ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : ContinuousOn u (uIcc a b)) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
(ContinuousOn.integrableOn_Icc hu).intervalIntegrable
#align continuous_on.interval_integrable ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable_of_Icc {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b)
(hu : ContinuousOn u (Icc a b)) : IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable ((uIcc_of_le h).symm ▸ hu)
#align continuous_on.interval_integrable_of_Icc ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable_of_Icc
/-- A continuous function on `ℝ` is `IntervalIntegrable` with respect to any locally finite measure
`ν` on ℝ. -/
theorem Continuous.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} (hu : Continuous u) (a b : ℝ) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
hu.continuousOn.intervalIntegrable
#align continuous.interval_integrable Continuous.intervalIntegrable
end
/-!
## Monotone and antitone functions are integral integrable
-/
section
variable {μ : Measure ℝ} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder E]
[OrderTopology E] [SecondCountableTopology E]
theorem MonotoneOn.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : MonotoneOn u (uIcc a b)) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff]
exact (hu.integrableOn_isCompact isCompact_uIcc).mono_set Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align monotone_on.interval_integrable MonotoneOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem AntitoneOn.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : AntitoneOn u (uIcc a b)) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
hu.dual_right.intervalIntegrable
#align antitone_on.interval_integrable AntitoneOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem Monotone.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : Monotone u) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
(hu.monotoneOn _).intervalIntegrable
#align monotone.interval_integrable Monotone.intervalIntegrable
theorem Antitone.intervalIntegrable {u : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hu : Antitone u) :
IntervalIntegrable u μ a b :=
(hu.antitoneOn _).intervalIntegrable
#align antitone.interval_integrable Antitone.intervalIntegrable
end
/-- Let `l'` be a measurably generated filter; let `l` be a of filter such that each `s ∈ l'`
eventually includes `Ioc u v` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`. Let `μ` be a measure finite at `l'`.
Suppose that `f : ℝ → E` has a finite limit at `l' ⊓ ae μ`. Then `f` is interval integrable on
`u..v` provided that both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
Typeclass instances allow Lean to find `l'` based on `l` but not vice versa, so
`apply Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable_ae` will generate goals `Filter ℝ` and
`TendstoIxxClass Ioc ?m_1 l'`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable_ae {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ}
{l l' : Filter ℝ} (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l' μ) [TendstoIxxClass Ioc l l']
[IsMeasurablyGenerated l'] (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l') {c : E} (hf : Tendsto f (l' ⊓ ae μ) (𝓝 c))
{u v : ι → ℝ} {lt : Filter ι} (hu : Tendsto u lt l) (hv : Tendsto v lt l) :
∀ᶠ t in lt, IntervalIntegrable f μ (u t) (v t) :=
have := (hf.integrableAtFilter_ae hfm hμ).eventually
((hu.Ioc hv).eventually this).and <| (hv.Ioc hu).eventually this
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_interval_integrable_ae Filter.Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable_ae
/-- Let `l'` be a measurably generated filter; let `l` be a of filter such that each `s ∈ l'`
eventually includes `Ioc u v` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`. Let `μ` be a measure finite at `l'`.
Suppose that `f : ℝ → E` has a finite limit at `l`. Then `f` is interval integrable on `u..v`
provided that both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
Typeclass instances allow Lean to find `l'` based on `l` but not vice versa, so
`apply Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable` will generate goals `Filter ℝ` and
`TendstoIxxClass Ioc ?m_1 l'`. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ} {l l' : Filter ℝ}
(hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l' μ) [TendstoIxxClass Ioc l l'] [IsMeasurablyGenerated l']
(hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l') {c : E} (hf : Tendsto f l' (𝓝 c)) {u v : ι → ℝ} {lt : Filter ι}
(hu : Tendsto u lt l) (hv : Tendsto v lt l) : ∀ᶠ t in lt, IntervalIntegrable f μ (u t) (v t) :=
(hf.mono_left inf_le_left).eventually_intervalIntegrable_ae hfm hμ hu hv
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_interval_integrable Filter.Tendsto.eventually_intervalIntegrable
/-!
### Interval integral: definition and basic properties
In this section we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` as `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`
and prove some basic properties.
-/
variable [CompleteSpace E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- The interval integral `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` is defined
as `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`. If `a ≤ b`, then it equals
`∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ`, otherwise it equals `-∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`. -/
def intervalIntegral (f : ℝ → E) (a b : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ) : E :=
(∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ
#align interval_integral intervalIntegral
notation3"∫ "(...)" in "a".."b", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => intervalIntegral r a b μ
notation3"∫ "(...)" in "a".."b", "r:60:(scoped f => intervalIntegral f a b volume) => r
namespace intervalIntegral
section Basic
variable {a b : ℝ} {f g : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : (∫ _ in a..b, (0 : E) ∂μ) = 0 := by simp [intervalIntegral]
#align interval_integral.integral_zero intervalIntegral.integral_zero
theorem integral_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ := by
simp [intervalIntegral, h]
#align interval_integral.integral_of_le intervalIntegral.integral_of_le
@[simp]
theorem integral_same : ∫ x in a..a, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
sub_self _
#align interval_integral.integral_same intervalIntegral.integral_same
theorem integral_symm (a b) : ∫ x in b..a, f x ∂μ = -∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [intervalIntegral, neg_sub]
#align interval_integral.integral_symm intervalIntegral.integral_symm
theorem integral_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = -∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [integral_symm b, integral_of_le h]
#align interval_integral.integral_of_ge intervalIntegral.integral_of_ge
theorem intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc (f : ℝ → E) (a b : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = (if a ≤ b then 1 else -1 : ℝ) • ∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ := by
split_ifs with h
· simp only [integral_of_le h, uIoc_of_le h, one_smul]
· simp only [integral_of_ge (not_le.1 h).le, uIoc_of_lt (not_le.1 h), neg_one_smul]
#align interval_integral.interval_integral_eq_integral_uIoc intervalIntegral.intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc
theorem norm_intervalIntegral_eq (f : ℝ → E) (a b : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ) :
‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ = ‖∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ‖ := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, norm_smul]
split_ifs <;> simp only [norm_neg, norm_one, one_mul]
#align interval_integral.norm_interval_integral_eq intervalIntegral.norm_intervalIntegral_eq
theorem abs_intervalIntegral_eq (f : ℝ → ℝ) (a b : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ) :
|∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ| = |∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ| :=
norm_intervalIntegral_eq f a b μ
#align interval_integral.abs_interval_integral_eq intervalIntegral.abs_intervalIntegral_eq
theorem integral_cases (f : ℝ → E) (a b) :
(∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) ∈ ({∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ, -∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ} : Set E) := by
rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc]; split_ifs <;> simp
#align interval_integral.integral_cases intervalIntegral.integral_cases
nonrec theorem integral_undef (h : ¬IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff] at h
rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, integral_undef h, smul_zero]
#align interval_integral.integral_undef intervalIntegral.integral_undef
theorem intervalIntegrable_of_integral_ne_zero {a b : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ}
(h : (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) ≠ 0) : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
not_imp_comm.1 integral_undef h
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_of_integral_ne_zero intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_of_integral_ne_zero
nonrec theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ι a b))) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable hf, smul_zero]
#align interval_integral.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable intervalIntegral.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable_of_le (h : a ≤ b)
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ioc a b))) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable <| by rwa [uIoc_of_le h]
#align interval_integral.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable_of_le intervalIntegral.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable_of_le
theorem norm_integral_min_max (f : ℝ → E) :
‖∫ x in min a b..max a b, f x ∂μ‖ = ‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ := by
cases le_total a b <;> simp [*, integral_symm a b]
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_min_max intervalIntegral.norm_integral_min_max
theorem norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc (f : ℝ → E) :
‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ = ‖∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ‖ := by
rw [← norm_integral_min_max, integral_of_le min_le_max, uIoc]
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc intervalIntegral.norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc
theorem abs_integral_eq_abs_integral_uIoc (f : ℝ → ℝ) :
|∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ| = |∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ| :=
norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc f
#align interval_integral.abs_integral_eq_abs_integral_uIoc intervalIntegral.abs_integral_eq_abs_integral_uIoc
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm_Ioc : ‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x in Ι a b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ :=
calc
‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ = ‖∫ x in Ι a b, f x ∂μ‖ := norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc f
_ ≤ ∫ x in Ι a b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm f
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm_Ioc intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm_Ioc
theorem norm_integral_le_abs_integral_norm : ‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ |∫ x in a..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ| := by
simp only [← Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc]
exact le_trans (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _) (le_abs_self _)
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_le_abs_integral_norm intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_abs_integral_norm
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm (h : a ≤ b) :
‖∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x in a..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ :=
norm_integral_le_integral_norm_Ioc.trans_eq <| by rw [uIoc_of_le h, integral_of_le h]
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
nonrec theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le {g : ℝ → ℝ} (h : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ.restrict <| Ι a b, ‖f t‖ ≤ g t)
(hbound : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b) : ‖∫ t in a..b, f t ∂μ‖ ≤ |∫ t in a..b, g t ∂μ| := by
simp_rw [norm_intervalIntegral_eq, abs_intervalIntegral_eq,
abs_eq_self.mpr (integral_nonneg_of_ae <| h.mono fun _t ht => (norm_nonneg _).trans ht),
norm_integral_le_of_norm_le hbound.def' h]
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae {a b C : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
(h : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ Ι a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : ‖∫ x in a..b, f x‖ ≤ C * |b - a| := by
rw [norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc]
convert norm_setIntegral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae'' _ measurableSet_Ioc h using 1
· rw [Real.volume_Ioc, max_sub_min_eq_abs, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (abs_nonneg _)]
· simp only [Real.volume_Ioc, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top]
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const {a b C : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E} (h : ∀ x ∈ Ι a b, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
‖∫ x in a..b, f x‖ ≤ C * |b - a| :=
norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae <| eventually_of_forall h
#align interval_integral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const
@[simp]
nonrec theorem integral_add (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hg : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x + g x ∂μ = (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) + ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, integral_add hf.def' hg.def', smul_add]
#align interval_integral.integral_add intervalIntegral.integral_add
nonrec theorem integral_finset_sum {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ → E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IntervalIntegrable (f i) μ a b) :
∫ x in a..b, ∑ i ∈ s, f i x ∂μ = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫ x in a..b, f i x ∂μ := by
simp only [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, integral_finset_sum s fun i hi => (h i hi).def',
Finset.smul_sum]
#align interval_integral.integral_finset_sum intervalIntegral.integral_finset_sum
@[simp]
nonrec theorem integral_neg : ∫ x in a..b, -f x ∂μ = -∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [intervalIntegral, integral_neg]; abel
#align interval_integral.integral_neg intervalIntegral.integral_neg
@[simp]
theorem integral_sub (hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hg : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x - g x ∂μ = (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using (integral_add hf hg.neg).trans (congr_arg _ integral_neg)
#align interval_integral.integral_sub intervalIntegral.integral_sub
@[simp]
nonrec theorem integral_smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] (r : 𝕜) (f : ℝ → E) :
∫ x in a..b, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [intervalIntegral, integral_smul, smul_sub]
#align interval_integral.integral_smul intervalIntegral.integral_smul
@[simp]
nonrec theorem integral_smul_const {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (f : ℝ → 𝕜) (c : E) :
∫ x in a..b, f x • c ∂μ = (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) • c := by
simp only [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, integral_smul_const, smul_assoc]
#align interval_integral.integral_smul_const intervalIntegral.integral_smul_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_const_mul {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] (r : 𝕜) (f : ℝ → 𝕜) :
∫ x in a..b, r * f x ∂μ = r * ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ :=
integral_smul r f
#align interval_integral.integral_const_mul intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul
@[simp]
theorem integral_mul_const {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] (r : 𝕜) (f : ℝ → 𝕜) :
∫ x in a..b, f x * r ∂μ = (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) * r := by
simpa only [mul_comm r] using integral_const_mul r f
#align interval_integral.integral_mul_const intervalIntegral.integral_mul_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_div {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] (r : 𝕜) (f : ℝ → 𝕜) :
∫ x in a..b, f x / r ∂μ = (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) / r := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using integral_mul_const r⁻¹ f
#align interval_integral.integral_div intervalIntegral.integral_div
theorem integral_const' (c : E) :
∫ _ in a..b, c ∂μ = ((μ <| Ioc a b).toReal - (μ <| Ioc b a).toReal) • c := by
simp only [intervalIntegral, setIntegral_const, sub_smul]
#align interval_integral.integral_const' intervalIntegral.integral_const'
@[simp]
theorem integral_const (c : E) : ∫ _ in a..b, c = (b - a) • c := by
simp only [integral_const', Real.volume_Ioc, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal', ← neg_sub b,
max_zero_sub_eq_self]
#align interval_integral.integral_const intervalIntegral.integral_const
nonrec theorem integral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂c • μ = c.toReal • ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [intervalIntegral, Measure.restrict_smul, integral_smul_measure, smul_sub]
#align interval_integral.integral_smul_measure intervalIntegral.integral_smul_measure
end Basic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add `Complex.ofReal` version of `_root_.integral_ofReal`
nonrec theorem _root_.RCLike.intervalIntegral_ofReal {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {a b : ℝ}
{μ : Measure ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} : (∫ x in a..b, (f x : 𝕜) ∂μ) = ↑(∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) := by
simp only [intervalIntegral, integral_ofReal, RCLike.ofReal_sub]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-06")]
alias RCLike.interval_integral_ofReal := RCLike.intervalIntegral_ofReal
nonrec theorem integral_ofReal {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} :
(∫ x in a..b, (f x : ℂ) ∂μ) = ↑(∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) :=
RCLike.intervalIntegral_ofReal
#align interval_integral.integral_of_real intervalIntegral.integral_ofReal
section ContinuousLinearMap
variable {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
open ContinuousLinearMap
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.intervalIntegral_apply {a b : ℝ} {φ : ℝ → F →L[𝕜] E}
(hφ : IntervalIntegrable φ μ a b) (v : F) :
(∫ x in a..b, φ x ∂μ) v = ∫ x in a..b, φ x v ∂μ := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, ← integral_apply hφ.def' v, coe_smul', Pi.smul_apply]
#align continuous_linear_map.interval_integral_apply ContinuousLinearMap.intervalIntegral_apply
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.intervalIntegral_comp_comm (L : E →L[𝕜] F)
(hf : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : (∫ x in a..b, L (f x) ∂μ) = L (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegral, L.integral_comp_comm hf.1, L.integral_comp_comm hf.2, L.map_sub]
#align continuous_linear_map.interval_integral_comp_comm ContinuousLinearMap.intervalIntegral_comp_comm
end ContinuousLinearMap
/-!
## Basic arithmetic
Includes addition, scalar multiplication and affine transformations.
-/
section Comp
variable {a b c d : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E)
/-!
Porting note: some `@[simp]` attributes in this section were removed to make the `simpNF` linter
happy. TODO: find out if these lemmas are actually good or bad `simp` lemmas.
-/
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_mul_right (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (x * c)) = c⁻¹ • ∫ x in a * c..b * c, f x := by
have A : MeasurableEmbedding fun x => x * c :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight₀ c hc).closedEmbedding.measurableEmbedding
conv_rhs => rw [← Real.smul_map_volume_mul_right hc]
simp_rw [integral_smul_measure, intervalIntegral, A.setIntegral_map,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (abs_nonneg c)]
cases' hc.lt_or_lt with h h
· simp [h, mul_div_cancel_right₀, hc, abs_of_neg,
Measure.restrict_congr_set (α := ℝ) (μ := volume) Ico_ae_eq_Ioc]
· simp [h, mul_div_cancel_right₀, hc, abs_of_pos]
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_mul_right intervalIntegral.integral_comp_mul_right
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem smul_integral_comp_mul_right (c) :
(c • ∫ x in a..b, f (x * c)) = ∫ x in a * c..b * c, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_mul_right]
#align interval_integral.smul_integral_comp_mul_right intervalIntegral.smul_integral_comp_mul_right
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_mul_left (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (c * x)) = c⁻¹ • ∫ x in c * a..c * b, f x := by
simpa only [mul_comm c] using integral_comp_mul_right f hc
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_mul_left intervalIntegral.integral_comp_mul_left
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem smul_integral_comp_mul_left (c) :
(c • ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x)) = ∫ x in c * a..c * b, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_mul_left]
#align interval_integral.smul_integral_comp_mul_left intervalIntegral.smul_integral_comp_mul_left
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_div (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (x / c)) = c • ∫ x in a / c..b / c, f x := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using integral_comp_mul_right f (inv_ne_zero hc)
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_div intervalIntegral.integral_comp_div
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_smul_integral_comp_div (c) :
(c⁻¹ • ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c)) = ∫ x in a / c..b / c, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_div]
#align interval_integral.inv_smul_integral_comp_div intervalIntegral.inv_smul_integral_comp_div
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_add_right (d) : (∫ x in a..b, f (x + d)) = ∫ x in a + d..b + d, f x :=
have A : MeasurableEmbedding fun x => x + d :=
(Homeomorph.addRight d).closedEmbedding.measurableEmbedding
calc
(∫ x in a..b, f (x + d)) = ∫ x in a + d..b + d, f x ∂Measure.map (fun x => x + d) volume := by
simp [intervalIntegral, A.setIntegral_map]
_ = ∫ x in a + d..b + d, f x := by rw [map_add_right_eq_self]
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_add_right intervalIntegral.integral_comp_add_right
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
nonrec theorem integral_comp_add_left (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (d + x)) = ∫ x in d + a..d + b, f x := by
simpa only [add_comm d] using integral_comp_add_right f d
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_add_left intervalIntegral.integral_comp_add_left
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_mul_add (hc : c ≠ 0) (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (c * x + d)) = c⁻¹ • ∫ x in c * a + d..c * b + d, f x := by
rw [← integral_comp_add_right, ← integral_comp_mul_left _ hc]
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_mul_add intervalIntegral.integral_comp_mul_add
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem smul_integral_comp_mul_add (c d) :
(c • ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x + d)) = ∫ x in c * a + d..c * b + d, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_mul_add]
#align interval_integral.smul_integral_comp_mul_add intervalIntegral.smul_integral_comp_mul_add
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_add_mul (hc : c ≠ 0) (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (d + c * x)) = c⁻¹ • ∫ x in d + c * a..d + c * b, f x := by
rw [← integral_comp_add_left, ← integral_comp_mul_left _ hc]
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_add_mul intervalIntegral.integral_comp_add_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem smul_integral_comp_add_mul (c d) :
(c • ∫ x in a..b, f (d + c * x)) = ∫ x in d + c * a..d + c * b, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_add_mul]
#align interval_integral.smul_integral_comp_add_mul intervalIntegral.smul_integral_comp_add_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_div_add (hc : c ≠ 0) (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (x / c + d)) = c • ∫ x in a / c + d..b / c + d, f x := by
simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul, inv_inv] using integral_comp_mul_add f (inv_ne_zero hc) d
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_div_add intervalIntegral.integral_comp_div_add
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_smul_integral_comp_div_add (c d) :
(c⁻¹ • ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c + d)) = ∫ x in a / c + d..b / c + d, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_div_add]
#align interval_integral.inv_smul_integral_comp_div_add intervalIntegral.inv_smul_integral_comp_div_add
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_add_div (hc : c ≠ 0) (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (d + x / c)) = c • ∫ x in d + a / c..d + b / c, f x := by
simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul, inv_inv] using integral_comp_add_mul f (inv_ne_zero hc) d
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_add_div intervalIntegral.integral_comp_add_div
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_smul_integral_comp_add_div (c d) :
(c⁻¹ • ∫ x in a..b, f (d + x / c)) = ∫ x in d + a / c..d + b / c, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_add_div]
#align interval_integral.inv_smul_integral_comp_add_div intervalIntegral.inv_smul_integral_comp_add_div
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_mul_sub (hc : c ≠ 0) (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (c * x - d)) = c⁻¹ • ∫ x in c * a - d..c * b - d, f x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using integral_comp_mul_add f hc (-d)
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_mul_sub intervalIntegral.integral_comp_mul_sub
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem smul_integral_comp_mul_sub (c d) :
(c • ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x - d)) = ∫ x in c * a - d..c * b - d, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_mul_sub]
#align interval_integral.smul_integral_comp_mul_sub intervalIntegral.smul_integral_comp_mul_sub
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_sub_mul (hc : c ≠ 0) (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (d - c * x)) = c⁻¹ • ∫ x in d - c * b..d - c * a, f x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
rw [integral_comp_add_mul f (neg_ne_zero.mpr hc) d, integral_symm]
simp only [inv_neg, smul_neg, neg_neg, neg_smul]
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_sub_mul intervalIntegral.integral_comp_sub_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem smul_integral_comp_sub_mul (c d) :
(c • ∫ x in a..b, f (d - c * x)) = ∫ x in d - c * b..d - c * a, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_sub_mul]
#align interval_integral.smul_integral_comp_sub_mul intervalIntegral.smul_integral_comp_sub_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_div_sub (hc : c ≠ 0) (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (x / c - d)) = c • ∫ x in a / c - d..b / c - d, f x := by
simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul, inv_inv] using integral_comp_mul_sub f (inv_ne_zero hc) d
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_div_sub intervalIntegral.integral_comp_div_sub
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_smul_integral_comp_div_sub (c d) :
(c⁻¹ • ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c - d)) = ∫ x in a / c - d..b / c - d, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_div_sub]
#align interval_integral.inv_smul_integral_comp_div_sub intervalIntegral.inv_smul_integral_comp_div_sub
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_sub_div (hc : c ≠ 0) (d) :
(∫ x in a..b, f (d - x / c)) = c • ∫ x in d - b / c..d - a / c, f x := by
simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul, inv_inv] using integral_comp_sub_mul f (inv_ne_zero hc) d
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_sub_div intervalIntegral.integral_comp_sub_div
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_smul_integral_comp_sub_div (c d) :
(c⁻¹ • ∫ x in a..b, f (d - x / c)) = ∫ x in d - b / c..d - a / c, f x := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> simp [hc, integral_comp_sub_div]
#align interval_integral.inv_smul_integral_comp_sub_div intervalIntegral.inv_smul_integral_comp_sub_div
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_sub_right (d) : (∫ x in a..b, f (x - d)) = ∫ x in a - d..b - d, f x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using integral_comp_add_right f (-d)
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_sub_right intervalIntegral.integral_comp_sub_right
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_sub_left (d) : (∫ x in a..b, f (d - x)) = ∫ x in d - b..d - a, f x := by
simpa only [one_mul, one_smul, inv_one] using integral_comp_sub_mul f one_ne_zero d
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_sub_left intervalIntegral.integral_comp_sub_left
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem integral_comp_neg : (∫ x in a..b, f (-x)) = ∫ x in -b..-a, f x := by
simpa only [zero_sub] using integral_comp_sub_left f 0
#align interval_integral.integral_comp_neg intervalIntegral.integral_comp_neg
end Comp
/-!
### Integral is an additive function of the interval
In this section we prove that `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ`
as well as a few other identities trivially equivalent to this one. We also prove that
`∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ` provided that `support f ⊆ Ioc a b`.
-/
section OrderClosedTopology
variable {a b c d : ℝ} {f g : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ}
/-- If two functions are equal in the relevant interval, their interval integrals are also equal. -/
theorem integral_congr {a b : ℝ} (h : EqOn f g [[a, b]]) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ := by
rcases le_total a b with hab | hab <;>
simpa [hab, integral_of_le, integral_of_ge] using
setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioc (h.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
#align interval_integral.integral_congr intervalIntegral.integral_congr
theorem integral_add_adjacent_intervals_cancel (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hbc : IntervalIntegrable f μ b c) :
(((∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ) + ∫ x in c..a, f x ∂μ) = 0 := by
have hac := hab.trans hbc
simp only [intervalIntegral, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_eq_zero]
iterate 4 rw [← integral_union]
· suffices Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b c ∪ Ioc c a = Ioc b a ∪ Ioc c b ∪ Ioc a c by rw [this]
rw [Ioc_union_Ioc_union_Ioc_cycle, union_right_comm, Ioc_union_Ioc_union_Ioc_cycle,
min_left_comm, max_left_comm]
all_goals
simp [*, MeasurableSet.union, measurableSet_Ioc, Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same,
Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same.symm, hab.1, hab.2, hbc.1, hbc.2, hac.1, hac.2]
#align interval_integral.integral_add_adjacent_intervals_cancel intervalIntegral.integral_add_adjacent_intervals_cancel
theorem integral_add_adjacent_intervals (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hbc : IntervalIntegrable f μ b c) :
((∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ) = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← add_neg_eq_zero, ← integral_symm, integral_add_adjacent_intervals_cancel hab hbc]
#align interval_integral.integral_add_adjacent_intervals intervalIntegral.integral_add_adjacent_intervals
theorem sum_integral_adjacent_intervals_Ico {a : ℕ → ℝ} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(hint : ∀ k ∈ Ico m n, IntervalIntegrable f μ (a k) (a <| k + 1)) :
∑ k ∈ Finset.Ico m n, ∫ x in a k..a <| k + 1, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a m..a n, f x ∂μ := by
revert hint
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n hmn
· simp
· intro p hmp IH h
rw [Finset.sum_Ico_succ_top hmp, IH, integral_add_adjacent_intervals]
· refine IntervalIntegrable.trans_iterate_Ico hmp fun k hk => h k ?_
exact (Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl (Nat.le_succ _)) hk
· apply h
simp [hmp]
· intro k hk
exact h _ (Ico_subset_Ico_right p.le_succ hk)
#align interval_integral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals_Ico intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals_Ico
theorem sum_integral_adjacent_intervals {a : ℕ → ℝ} {n : ℕ}
(hint : ∀ k < n, IntervalIntegrable f μ (a k) (a <| k + 1)) :
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, ∫ x in a k..a <| k + 1, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in (a 0)..(a n), f x ∂μ := by
rw [← Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range]
exact sum_integral_adjacent_intervals_Ico (zero_le n) fun k hk => hint k hk.2
#align interval_integral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals
theorem integral_interval_sub_left (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hac : IntervalIntegrable f μ a c) :
((∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ) = ∫ x in c..b, f x ∂μ :=
sub_eq_of_eq_add' <| Eq.symm <| integral_add_adjacent_intervals hac (hac.symm.trans hab)
#align interval_integral.integral_interval_sub_left intervalIntegral.integral_interval_sub_left
theorem integral_interval_add_interval_comm (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hcd : IntervalIntegrable f μ c d) (hac : IntervalIntegrable f μ a c) :
((∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) + ∫ x in c..d, f x ∂μ) =
(∫ x in a..d, f x ∂μ) + ∫ x in c..b, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_add_adjacent_intervals hac hcd, add_assoc, add_left_comm,
integral_add_adjacent_intervals hac (hac.symm.trans hab), add_comm]
#align interval_integral.integral_interval_add_interval_comm intervalIntegral.integral_interval_add_interval_comm
theorem integral_interval_sub_interval_comm (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hcd : IntervalIntegrable f μ c d) (hac : IntervalIntegrable f μ a c) :
((∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in c..d, f x ∂μ) =
(∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in b..d, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, ← integral_symm,
integral_interval_add_interval_comm hab hcd.symm (hac.trans hcd)]
#align interval_integral.integral_interval_sub_interval_comm intervalIntegral.integral_interval_sub_interval_comm
theorem integral_interval_sub_interval_comm' (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b)
(hcd : IntervalIntegrable f μ c d) (hac : IntervalIntegrable f μ a c) :
((∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in c..d, f x ∂μ) =
(∫ x in d..b, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in c..a, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_interval_sub_interval_comm hab hcd hac, integral_symm b d, integral_symm a c,
sub_neg_eq_add, sub_eq_neg_add]
#align interval_integral.integral_interval_sub_interval_comm' intervalIntegral.integral_interval_sub_interval_comm'
theorem integral_Iic_sub_Iic (ha : IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ) (hb : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ) :
((∫ x in Iic b, f x ∂μ) - ∫ x in Iic a, f x ∂μ) = ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ := by
wlog hab : a ≤ b generalizing a b
· rw [integral_symm, ← this hb ha (le_of_not_le hab), neg_sub]
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add', integral_of_le hab, ← integral_union (Iic_disjoint_Ioc le_rfl),
Iic_union_Ioc_eq_Iic hab]
exacts [measurableSet_Ioc, ha, hb.mono_set fun _ => And.right]
#align interval_integral.integral_Iic_sub_Iic intervalIntegral.integral_Iic_sub_Iic
theorem integral_Iic_add_Ioi (h_left : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ)
(h_right : IntegrableOn f (Ioi b) μ) :
(∫ x in Iic b, f x ∂μ) + (∫ x in Ioi b, f x ∂μ) = ∫ (x : ℝ), f x ∂μ := by
convert (integral_union (Iic_disjoint_Ioi <| Eq.le rfl) measurableSet_Ioi h_left h_right).symm
rw [Iic_union_Ioi, Measure.restrict_univ]
theorem integral_Iio_add_Ici (h_left : IntegrableOn f (Iio b) μ)
(h_right : IntegrableOn f (Ici b) μ) :
(∫ x in Iio b, f x ∂μ) + (∫ x in Ici b, f x ∂μ) = ∫ (x : ℝ), f x ∂μ := by
convert (integral_union (Iio_disjoint_Ici <| Eq.le rfl) measurableSet_Ici h_left h_right).symm
rw [Iio_union_Ici, Measure.restrict_univ]
/-- If `μ` is a finite measure then `∫ x in a..b, c ∂μ = (μ (Iic b) - μ (Iic a)) • c`. -/
theorem integral_const_of_cdf [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
∫ _ in a..b, c ∂μ = ((μ (Iic b)).toReal - (μ (Iic a)).toReal) • c := by
simp only [sub_smul, ← setIntegral_const]
refine (integral_Iic_sub_Iic ?_ ?_).symm <;>
simp only [integrableOn_const, measure_lt_top, or_true_iff]
#align interval_integral.integral_const_of_cdf intervalIntegral.integral_const_of_cdf
theorem integral_eq_integral_of_support_subset {a b} (h : support f ⊆ Ioc a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases le_total a b with hab | hab
· rw [integral_of_le hab, ← integral_indicator measurableSet_Ioc, indicator_eq_self.2 h]
· rw [Ioc_eq_empty hab.not_lt, subset_empty_iff, support_eq_empty_iff] at h
simp [h]
#align interval_integral.integral_eq_integral_of_support_subset intervalIntegral.integral_eq_integral_of_support_subset
theorem integral_congr_ae' (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → f x = g x)
(h' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → f x = g x) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [intervalIntegral, setIntegral_congr_ae measurableSet_Ioc h,
setIntegral_congr_ae measurableSet_Ioc h']
#align interval_integral.integral_congr_ae' intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae'
theorem integral_congr_ae (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → f x = g x) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ :=
integral_congr_ae' (ae_uIoc_iff.mp h).1 (ae_uIoc_iff.mp h).2
#align interval_integral.integral_congr_ae intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae
theorem integral_zero_ae (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → f x = 0) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
calc
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ _ in a..b, 0 ∂μ := integral_congr_ae h
_ = 0 := integral_zero
#align interval_integral.integral_zero_ae intervalIntegral.integral_zero_ae
nonrec theorem integral_indicator {a₁ a₂ a₃ : ℝ} (h : a₂ ∈ Icc a₁ a₃) :
∫ x in a₁..a₃, indicator {x | x ≤ a₂} f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a₁..a₂, f x ∂μ := by
have : {x | x ≤ a₂} ∩ Ioc a₁ a₃ = Ioc a₁ a₂ := Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le h.2
rw [integral_of_le h.1, integral_of_le (h.1.trans h.2), integral_indicator,
Measure.restrict_restrict, this]
· exact measurableSet_Iic
all_goals apply measurableSet_Iic
#align interval_integral.integral_indicator intervalIntegral.integral_indicator
end OrderClosedTopology
section
variable {f g : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_le_of_nonneg_ae (hab : a ≤ b) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ioc a b)] f)
(hfi : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ioc a b)] 0 := by
rw [integral_of_le hab, integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1]
#align interval_integral.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_le_of_nonneg_ae intervalIntegral.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_le_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b a)] f)
(hfi : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b a)] 0 := by
rcases le_total a b with hab | hab <;>
simp only [Ioc_eq_empty hab.not_lt, empty_union, union_empty] at hf ⊢
· exact integral_eq_zero_iff_of_le_of_nonneg_ae hab hf hfi
· rw [integral_symm, neg_eq_zero, integral_eq_zero_iff_of_le_of_nonneg_ae hab hf hfi.symm]
#align interval_integral.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae intervalIntegral.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae
/-- If `f` is nonnegative and integrable on the unordered interval `Set.uIoc a b`, then its
integral over `a..b` is positive if and only if `a < b` and the measure of
`Function.support f ∩ Set.Ioc a b` is positive. -/
theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae' (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ι a b)] f)
(hfi : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
(0 < ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) ↔ a < b ∧ 0 < μ (support f ∩ Ioc a b) := by
cases' lt_or_le a b with hab hba
· rw [uIoc_of_le hab.le] at hf
simp only [hab, true_and_iff, integral_of_le hab.le,
setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1]
· suffices (∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) ≤ 0 by simp only [this.not_lt, hba.not_lt, false_and_iff]
rw [integral_of_ge hba, neg_nonpos]
rw [uIoc_comm, uIoc_of_le hba] at hf
exact integral_nonneg_of_ae hf
#align interval_integral.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae' intervalIntegral.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae'
/-- If `f` is nonnegative a.e.-everywhere and it is integrable on the unordered interval
`Set.uIoc a b`, then its integral over `a..b` is positive if and only if `a < b` and the
measure of `Function.support f ∩ Set.Ioc a b` is positive. -/
theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) :
(0 < ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) ↔ a < b ∧ 0 < μ (support f ∩ Ioc a b) :=
integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae' (ae_mono Measure.restrict_le_self hf) hfi
#align interval_integral.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae intervalIntegral.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae
/-- If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is integrable on `(a, b]` for real numbers `a < b`, and positive on the interior
of the interval, then its integral over `a..b` is strictly positive. -/
theorem intervalIntegral_pos_of_pos_on {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ} (hfi : IntervalIntegrable f volume a b)
(hpos : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo a b → 0 < f x) (hab : a < b) : 0 < ∫ x : ℝ in a..b, f x := by
have hsupp : Ioo a b ⊆ support f ∩ Ioc a b := fun x hx =>
⟨mem_support.mpr (hpos x hx).ne', Ioo_subset_Ioc_self hx⟩
have h₀ : 0 ≤ᵐ[volume.restrict (uIoc a b)] f := by
rw [EventuallyLE, uIoc_of_le hab.le]
refine ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc ?_
rw [ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioo]
filter_upwards with x hx using (hpos x hx).le
rw [integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae' h₀ hfi]
exact ⟨hab, ((Measure.measure_Ioo_pos _).mpr hab).trans_le (measure_mono hsupp)⟩
#align interval_integral.interval_integral_pos_of_pos_on intervalIntegral.intervalIntegral_pos_of_pos_on
/-- If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is strictly positive everywhere, and integrable on `(a, b]` for real numbers
`a < b`, then its integral over `a..b` is strictly positive. (See `intervalIntegral_pos_of_pos_on`
for a version only assuming positivity of `f` on `(a, b)` rather than everywhere.) -/
theorem intervalIntegral_pos_of_pos {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hfi : IntervalIntegrable f MeasureSpace.volume a b) (hpos : ∀ x, 0 < f x) (hab : a < b) :
0 < ∫ x in a..b, f x :=
intervalIntegral_pos_of_pos_on hfi (fun x _ => hpos x) hab
#align interval_integral.interval_integral_pos_of_pos intervalIntegral.intervalIntegral_pos_of_pos
/-- If `f` and `g` are two functions that are interval integrable on `a..b`, `a ≤ b`,
`f x ≤ g x` for a.e. `x ∈ Set.Ioc a b`, and `f x < g x` on a subset of `Set.Ioc a b`
of nonzero measure, then `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ < ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ`. -/
theorem integral_lt_integral_of_ae_le_of_measure_setOf_lt_ne_zero (hab : a ≤ b)
(hfi : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hgi : IntervalIntegrable g μ a b)
(hle : f ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Ioc a b)] g) (hlt : μ.restrict (Ioc a b) {x | f x < g x} ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) < ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ := by
rw [← sub_pos, ← integral_sub hgi hfi, integral_of_le hab,
MeasureTheory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae]
· refine pos_iff_ne_zero.2 (mt (measure_mono_null ?_) hlt)
exact fun x hx => (sub_pos.2 hx.out).ne'
exacts [hle.mono fun x => sub_nonneg.2, hgi.1.sub hfi.1]
#align interval_integral.integral_lt_integral_of_ae_le_of_measure_set_of_lt_ne_zero intervalIntegral.integral_lt_integral_of_ae_le_of_measure_setOf_lt_ne_zero
/-- If `f` and `g` are continuous on `[a, b]`, `a < b`, `f x ≤ g x` on this interval, and
`f c < g c` at some point `c ∈ [a, b]`, then `∫ x in a..b, f x < ∫ x in a..b, g x`. -/
theorem integral_lt_integral_of_continuousOn_of_le_of_exists_lt {f g : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hab : a < b) (hfc : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hgc : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b))
(hle : ∀ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x ≤ g x) (hlt : ∃ c ∈ Icc a b, f c < g c) :
(∫ x in a..b, f x) < ∫ x in a..b, g x := by
apply integral_lt_integral_of_ae_le_of_measure_setOf_lt_ne_zero hab.le
(hfc.intervalIntegrable_of_Icc hab.le) (hgc.intervalIntegrable_of_Icc hab.le)
· simpa only [gt_iff_lt, not_lt, ge_iff_le, measurableSet_Ioc, ae_restrict_eq, le_principal_iff]
using (ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioc).mono hle
contrapose! hlt
have h_eq : f =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc a b)] g := by
simp only [← not_le, ← ae_iff] at hlt
exact EventuallyLE.antisymm ((ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioc).2 <|
eventually_of_forall hle) hlt
rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioc_ae_eq_Icc] at h_eq
exact fun c hc ↦ (Measure.eqOn_Icc_of_ae_eq volume hab.ne h_eq hfc hgc hc).ge
#align interval_integral.integral_lt_integral_of_continuous_on_of_le_of_exists_lt intervalIntegral.integral_lt_integral_of_continuousOn_of_le_of_exists_lt
theorem integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict (hab : a ≤ b) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict (Icc a b)] f) :
0 ≤ ∫ u in a..b, f u ∂μ := by
let H := ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset Ioc_subset_Icc_self hf
simpa only [integral_of_le hab] using setIntegral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict H
#align interval_integral.integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict
theorem integral_nonneg_of_ae (hab : a ≤ b) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ ∫ u in a..b, f u ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict hab <| ae_restrict_of_ae hf
#align interval_integral.integral_nonneg_of_ae intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg_of_ae
theorem integral_nonneg_of_forall (hab : a ≤ b) (hf : ∀ u, 0 ≤ f u) : 0 ≤ ∫ u in a..b, f u ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae hab <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align interval_integral.integral_nonneg_of_forall intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg_of_forall
theorem integral_nonneg (hab : a ≤ b) (hf : ∀ u, u ∈ Icc a b → 0 ≤ f u) : 0 ≤ ∫ u in a..b, f u ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict hab <| (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Icc).mpr <| ae_of_all μ hf
#align interval_integral.integral_nonneg intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 1,173 | 1,175 | theorem abs_integral_le_integral_abs (hab : a ≤ b) :
|∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ| ≤ ∫ x in a..b, |f x| ∂μ := by |
simpa only [← Real.norm_eq_abs] using norm_integral_le_integral_norm hab
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.SpecificFunctions.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.complex from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8f9fea08977f7e450770933ee6abb20733b47c92"
/-!
# Complex trigonometric functions
Basic facts and derivatives for the complex trigonometric functions.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred here, rather than
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for complex trigonometric
functions, or require additional imports which are not available in that file.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter
open scoped Real
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : cos θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2 := by
have h : (exp (θ * I) + exp (-θ * I)) / 2 = 0 ↔ exp (2 * θ * I) = -1 := by
rw [@div_eq_iff _ _ (exp (θ * I) + exp (-θ * I)) 2 0 two_ne_zero, zero_mul,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, ← div_eq_iff (exp_ne_zero _), ← exp_sub]
ring_nf
rw [cos, h, ← exp_pi_mul_I, exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int, mul_right_comm]
refine exists_congr fun x => ?_
refine (iff_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ?_).trans (mul_right_inj' <| mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero I_ne_zero)
field_simp; ring
#align complex.cos_eq_zero_iff Complex.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem cos_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : cos θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, θ ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, cos_eq_zero_iff]
#align complex.cos_ne_zero_iff Complex.cos_ne_zero_iff
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : sin θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = k * π := by
rw [← Complex.cos_sub_pi_div_two, cos_eq_zero_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
use k + 1
field_simp [eq_add_of_sub_eq hk]
ring
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use k - 1
field_simp
ring
#align complex.sin_eq_zero_iff Complex.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, θ ≠ k * π := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align complex.sin_ne_zero_iff Complex.sin_ne_zero_iff
/-- The tangent of a complex number is equal to zero
iff this number is equal to `k * π / 2` for an integer `k`.
Note that this lemma takes into account that we use zero as the junk value for division by zero.
See also `Complex.tan_eq_zero_iff'`. -/
theorem tan_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : tan θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, k * π / 2 = θ := by
rw [tan, div_eq_zero_iff, ← mul_eq_zero, ← mul_right_inj' two_ne_zero, mul_zero,
← mul_assoc, ← sin_two_mul, sin_eq_zero_iff]
field_simp [mul_comm, eq_comm]
#align complex.tan_eq_zero_iff Complex.tan_eq_zero_iff
theorem tan_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : tan θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, (k * π / 2 : ℂ) ≠ θ := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, tan_eq_zero_iff]
#align complex.tan_ne_zero_iff Complex.tan_ne_zero_iff
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
#align complex.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two Complex.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two
/-- If the tangent of a complex number is well-defined,
then it is equal to zero iff the number is equal to `k * π` for an integer `k`.
See also `Complex.tan_eq_zero_iff` for a version that takes into account junk values of `θ`. -/
theorem tan_eq_zero_iff' {θ : ℂ} (hθ : cos θ ≠ 0) : tan θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, k * π = θ := by
simp only [tan, hθ, div_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]; simp [eq_comm]
theorem cos_eq_cos_iff {x y : ℂ} : cos x = cos y ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = 2 * k * π - x :=
calc
cos x = cos y ↔ cos x - cos y = 0 := sub_eq_zero.symm
_ ↔ -2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 := by rw [cos_sub_cos]
_ ↔ sin ((x + y) / 2) = 0 ∨ sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 := by simp [(by norm_num : (2 : ℂ) ≠ 0)]
_ ↔ sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 ∨ sin ((x + y) / 2) = 0 := or_comm
_ ↔ (∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x) ∨ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π - x := by
apply or_congr <;>
field_simp [sin_eq_zero_iff, (by norm_num : -(2 : ℂ) ≠ 0), eq_sub_iff_add_eq',
sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_comm (2 : ℂ), mul_right_comm _ (2 : ℂ)]
constructor <;> · rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩; use -k; simp
_ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = 2 * k * π - x := exists_or.symm
#align complex.cos_eq_cos_iff Complex.cos_eq_cos_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Complex.lean | 104 | 107 | theorem sin_eq_sin_iff {x y : ℂ} :
sin x = sin y ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = (2 * k + 1) * π - x := by |
simp only [← Complex.cos_sub_pi_div_two, cos_eq_cos_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
refine exists_congr fun k => or_congr ?_ ?_ <;> refine Eq.congr rfl ?_ <;> field_simp <;> ring
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Pi
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
#align_import topology.metric_space.emetric_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8f305514e0d47dfaa710f5a52f0d21b588e6328"
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
This file is devoted to the definition and study of `EMetricSpace`s, i.e., metric
spaces in which the distance is allowed to take the value ∞. This extended distance is
called `edist`, and takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on emetric spaces are already introduced on uniform spaces
and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness, continuity and
uniform continuity.
The class `EMetricSpace` therefore extends `UniformSpace` (and `TopologicalSpace`).
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `eq_of_edist_eq_zero` we start setting up the
theory of `PseudoEMetricSpace`, where we don't require `edist x y = 0 → x = y` and we specialize
to `EMetricSpace` at the end.
-/
open Set Filter Classical
open scoped Uniformity Topology Filter NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
/-- Characterizing uniformities associated to a (generalized) distance function `D`
in terms of the elements of the uniformity. -/
theorem uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity [LinearOrder β] {U : Filter (α × α)} (z : β)
(D : α → α → β) (H : ∀ s, s ∈ U ↔ ∃ ε > z, ∀ {a b : α}, D a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s) :
U = ⨅ ε > z, 𝓟 { p : α × α | D p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
HasBasis.eq_biInf ⟨fun s => by simp only [H, subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_setOf]⟩
#align uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity
/-- `EDist α` means that `α` is equipped with an extended distance. -/
@[ext]
class EDist (α : Type*) where
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞
#align has_edist EDist
export EDist (edist)
/-- Creating a uniform space from an extended distance. -/
def uniformSpaceOfEDist (edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞) (edist_self : ∀ x : α, edist x x = 0)
(edist_comm : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = edist y x)
(edist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, edist x z ≤ edist x y + edist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle fun ε ε0 =>
⟨ε / 2, ENNReal.half_pos ε0.ne', fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
(ENNReal.add_lt_add h₁ h₂).trans_eq (ENNReal.add_halves _)⟩
#align uniform_space_of_edist uniformSpaceOfEDist
-- the uniform structure is embedded in the emetric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- Extended (pseudo) metric spaces, with an extended distance `edist` possibly taking the
value ∞
Each pseudo_emetric space induces a canonical `UniformSpace` and hence a canonical
`TopologicalSpace`.
This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `UniformSpace` structure. When
instantiating a `PseudoEMetricSpace` structure, the uniformity fields are not necessary, they
will be filled in by default. There is a default value for the uniformity, that can be substituted
in cases of interest, for instance when instantiating a `PseudoEMetricSpace` structure
on a product.
Continuity of `edist` is proved in `Topology.Instances.ENNReal`
-/
class PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends EDist α : Type u where
edist_self : ∀ x : α, edist x x = 0
edist_comm : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = edist y x
edist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, edist x z ≤ edist x y + edist y z
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := uniformSpaceOfEDist edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle
uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by rfl
#align pseudo_emetric_space PseudoEMetricSpace
attribute [instance] PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace
/- Pseudoemetric spaces are less common than metric spaces. Therefore, we work in a dedicated
namespace, while notions associated to metric spaces are mostly in the root namespace. -/
/-- Two pseudo emetric space structures with the same edistance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
protected theorem PseudoEMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoEMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toEDist = m'.toEDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with ed _ _ _ U hU
cases' m' with ed' _ _ _ U' hU'
congr 1
exact UniformSpace.ext (((show ed = ed' from h) ▸ hU).trans hU'.symm)
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
export PseudoEMetricSpace (edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle)
attribute [simp] edist_self
/-- Triangle inequality for the extended distance -/
theorem edist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : edist x y ≤ edist z x + edist z y := by
rw [edist_comm z]; apply edist_triangle
#align edist_triangle_left edist_triangle_left
theorem edist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : edist x y ≤ edist x z + edist y z := by
rw [edist_comm y]; apply edist_triangle
#align edist_triangle_right edist_triangle_right
theorem edist_congr_right {x y z : α} (h : edist x y = 0) : edist x z = edist y z := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← zero_add (edist y z), ← h]
apply edist_triangle
· rw [edist_comm] at h
rw [← zero_add (edist x z), ← h]
apply edist_triangle
#align edist_congr_right edist_congr_right
theorem edist_congr_left {x y z : α} (h : edist x y = 0) : edist z x = edist z y := by
rw [edist_comm z x, edist_comm z y]
apply edist_congr_right h
#align edist_congr_left edist_congr_left
-- new theorem
theorem edist_congr {w x y z : α} (hl : edist w x = 0) (hr : edist y z = 0) :
edist w y = edist x z :=
(edist_congr_right hl).trans (edist_congr_left hr)
theorem edist_triangle4 (x y z t : α) : edist x t ≤ edist x y + edist y z + edist z t :=
calc
edist x t ≤ edist x z + edist z t := edist_triangle x z t
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z + edist z t := add_le_add_right (edist_triangle x y z) _
#align edist_triangle4 edist_triangle4
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align edist_le_Ico_sum_edist edist_le_Ico_sum_edist
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align edist_le_range_sum_edist edist_le_range_sum_edist
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le
/-- Reformulation of the uniform structure in terms of the extended distance -/
theorem uniformity_pseudoedist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist
#align uniformity_pseudoedist uniformity_pseudoedist
theorem uniformSpace_edist :
‹PseudoEMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace =
uniformSpaceOfEDist edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext uniformity_pseudoedist
#align uniform_space_edist uniformSpace_edist
theorem uniformity_basis_edist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
(@uniformSpace_edist α _).symm ▸ UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun ⟨1, one_pos⟩ _ _ _ _ _
#align uniformity_basis_edist uniformity_basis_edist
/-- Characterization of the elements of the uniformity in terms of the extended distance -/
theorem mem_uniformity_edist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_edist.mem_uniformity_iff
#align mem_uniformity_edist mem_uniformity_edist
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ≥0∞`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_edist`, `uniformity_basis_edist'`,
`uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal`, and `uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat`. -/
protected theorem EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_edist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x hx => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx.out H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
#align emetric.mk_uniformity_basis EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ≥0∞`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_edist_le` and `uniformity_basis_edist_le'`. -/
protected theorem EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_edist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x hx => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx.out H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x hx => H (le_of_lt hx.out)⟩
#align emetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_le uniformity_basis_edist_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist' (ε' : ℝ≥0∞) (hε' : 0 < ε') :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => ε ∈ Ioo 0 ε') fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := exists_between hε'
⟨min ε δ, ⟨lt_min ε₀ hδ.1, lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) hδ.2⟩, min_le_left _ _⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist' uniformity_basis_edist'
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_le' (ε' : ℝ≥0∞) (hε' : 0 < ε') :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => ε ∈ Ioo 0 ε') fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => And.left) fun ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := exists_between hε'
⟨min ε δ, ⟨lt_min ε₀ hδ.1, lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) hδ.2⟩, min_le_left _ _⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_le' uniformity_basis_edist_le'
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => ENNReal.coe_pos.2) fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ε₀
⟨δ, ENNReal.coe_pos.1 hδ.1, le_of_lt hδ.2⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => ENNReal.coe_pos.2) fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ε₀
⟨δ, ENNReal.coe_pos.1 hδ.1, le_of_lt hδ.2⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < (↑n)⁻¹ } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ ↦ ENNReal.inv_pos.2 <| ENNReal.natCast_ne_top n) fun _ε ε₀ ↦
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt (ne_of_gt ε₀)
⟨n, trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < 2⁻¹ ^ n } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => ENNReal.pow_pos (ENNReal.inv_pos.2 ENNReal.two_ne_top) _)
fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ENNReal.exists_inv_two_pow_lt (ne_of_gt ε₀)
⟨n, trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow
/-- Fixed size neighborhoods of the diagonal belong to the uniform structure -/
theorem edist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_edist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, id⟩
#align edist_mem_uniformity edist_mem_uniformity
namespace EMetric
instance (priority := 900) instIsCountablyGeneratedUniformity : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α) :=
isCountablyGenerated_of_seq ⟨_, uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat.eq_iInf⟩
-- Porting note: changed explicit/implicit
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform continuity on a set for pseudoemetric spaces -/
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a}, a ∈ s → ∀ {b}, b ∈ s → edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.uniformContinuousOn_iff uniformity_basis_edist
#align emetric.uniform_continuous_on_iff EMetric.uniformContinuousOn_iff
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform continuity on pseudoemetric spaces -/
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_edist
#align emetric.uniform_continuous_iff EMetric.uniformContinuous_iff
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem uniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
uniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem uniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(uniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and uniformInducing_iff
#align emetric.uniform_embedding_iff EMetric.uniformEmbedding_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `UniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_uniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} (h : UniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (uniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
#align emetric.controlled_of_uniform_embedding EMetric.controlled_of_uniformEmbedding
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
#align emetric.cauchy_iff EMetric.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => edist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
#align emetric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences EMetric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
/-- A sequentially complete pseudoemetric space is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
#align emetric.complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto EMetric.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
#align emetric.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on_iff EMetric.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
#align emetric.tendsto_uniformly_on_iff EMetric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ,
forall_const, exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align emetric.tendsto_locally_uniformly_iff EMetric.tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ, forall_const]
#align emetric.tendsto_uniformly_iff EMetric.tendstoUniformly_iff
end EMetric
open EMetric
/-- Auxiliary function to replace the uniformity on a pseudoemetric space with
a uniformity which is equal to the original one, but maybe not defeq.
This is useful if one wants to construct a pseudoemetric space with a
specified uniformity. See Note [forgetful inheritance] explaining why having definitionally
the right uniformity is often important.
-/
def PseudoEMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoEMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoEMetricSpace α where
edist := @edist _ m.toEDist
edist_self := edist_self
edist_comm := edist_comm
edist_triangle := edist_triangle
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_edist := H.trans (@PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist α _)
#align pseudo_emetric_space.replace_uniformity PseudoEMetricSpace.replaceUniformity
/-- The extended pseudometric induced by a function taking values in a pseudoemetric space. -/
def PseudoEMetricSpace.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (m : PseudoEMetricSpace β) :
PseudoEMetricSpace α where
edist x y := edist (f x) (f y)
edist_self _ := edist_self _
edist_comm _ _ := edist_comm _ _
edist_triangle _ _ _ := edist_triangle _ _ _
toUniformSpace := UniformSpace.comap f m.toUniformSpace
uniformity_edist := (uniformity_basis_edist.comap (Prod.map f f)).eq_biInf
#align pseudo_emetric_space.induced PseudoEMetricSpace.induced
/-- Pseudoemetric space instance on subsets of pseudoemetric spaces -/
instance {α : Type*} {p : α → Prop} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] : PseudoEMetricSpace (Subtype p) :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.induced Subtype.val ‹_›
/-- The extended pseudodistance on a subset of a pseudoemetric space is the restriction of
the original pseudodistance, by definition -/
theorem Subtype.edist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : edist x y = edist (x : α) y := rfl
#align subtype.edist_eq Subtype.edist_eq
namespace MulOpposite
/-- Pseudoemetric space instance on the multiplicative opposite of a pseudoemetric space. -/
@[to_additive "Pseudoemetric space instance on the additive opposite of a pseudoemetric space."]
instance {α : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] : PseudoEMetricSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.induced unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : edist (unop x) (unop y) = edist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.edist_unop MulOpposite.edist_unop
#align add_opposite.edist_unop AddOpposite.edist_unop
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_op (x y : α) : edist (op x) (op y) = edist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.edist_op MulOpposite.edist_op
#align add_opposite.edist_op AddOpposite.edist_op
end MulOpposite
section ULift
instance : PseudoEMetricSpace (ULift α) := PseudoEMetricSpace.induced ULift.down ‹_›
theorem ULift.edist_eq (x y : ULift α) : edist x y = edist x.down y.down := rfl
#align ulift.edist_eq ULift.edist_eq
@[simp]
theorem ULift.edist_up_up (x y : α) : edist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = edist x y := rfl
#align ulift.edist_up_up ULift.edist_up_up
end ULift
/-- The product of two pseudoemetric spaces, with the max distance, is an extended
pseudometric spaces. We make sure that the uniform structure thus constructed is the one
corresponding to the product of uniform spaces, to avoid diamond problems. -/
instance Prod.pseudoEMetricSpaceMax [PseudoEMetricSpace β] : PseudoEMetricSpace (α × β) where
edist x y := edist x.1 y.1 ⊔ edist x.2 y.2
edist_self x := by simp
edist_comm x y := by simp [edist_comm]
edist_triangle x y z :=
max_le (le_trans (edist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)))
(le_trans (edist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _)))
uniformity_edist := uniformity_prod.trans <| by
simp [PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist, ← iInf_inf_eq, setOf_and]
toUniformSpace := inferInstance
#align prod.pseudo_emetric_space_max Prod.pseudoEMetricSpaceMax
theorem Prod.edist_eq [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (x y : α × β) :
edist x y = max (edist x.1 y.1) (edist x.2 y.2) :=
rfl
#align prod.edist_eq Prod.edist_eq
section Pi
open Finset
variable {π : β → Type*} [Fintype β]
-- Porting note: reordered instances
instance [∀ b, EDist (π b)] : EDist (∀ b, π b) where
edist f g := Finset.sup univ fun b => edist (f b) (g b)
theorem edist_pi_def [∀ b, EDist (π b)] (f g : ∀ b, π b) :
edist f g = Finset.sup univ fun b => edist (f b) (g b) :=
rfl
#align edist_pi_def edist_pi_def
theorem edist_le_pi_edist [∀ b, EDist (π b)] (f g : ∀ b, π b) (b : β) :
edist (f b) (g b) ≤ edist f g :=
le_sup (f := fun b => edist (f b) (g b)) (Finset.mem_univ b)
#align edist_le_pi_edist edist_le_pi_edist
theorem edist_pi_le_iff [∀ b, EDist (π b)] {f g : ∀ b, π b} {d : ℝ≥0∞} :
edist f g ≤ d ↔ ∀ b, edist (f b) (g b) ≤ d :=
Finset.sup_le_iff.trans <| by simp only [Finset.mem_univ, forall_const]
#align edist_pi_le_iff edist_pi_le_iff
theorem edist_pi_const_le (a b : α) : (edist (fun _ : β => a) fun _ => b) ≤ edist a b :=
edist_pi_le_iff.2 fun _ => le_rfl
#align edist_pi_const_le edist_pi_const_le
@[simp]
theorem edist_pi_const [Nonempty β] (a b : α) : (edist (fun _ : β => a) fun _ => b) = edist a b :=
Finset.sup_const univ_nonempty (edist a b)
#align edist_pi_const edist_pi_const
/-- The product of a finite number of pseudoemetric spaces, with the max distance, is still
a pseudoemetric space.
This construction would also work for infinite products, but it would not give rise
to the product topology. Hence, we only formalize it in the good situation of finitely many
spaces. -/
instance pseudoEMetricSpacePi [∀ b, PseudoEMetricSpace (π b)] : PseudoEMetricSpace (∀ b, π b) where
edist_self f := bot_unique <| Finset.sup_le <| by simp
edist_comm f g := by simp [edist_pi_def, edist_comm]
edist_triangle f g h := edist_pi_le_iff.2 fun b => le_trans (edist_triangle _ (g b) _)
(add_le_add (edist_le_pi_edist _ _ _) (edist_le_pi_edist _ _ _))
toUniformSpace := Pi.uniformSpace _
uniformity_edist := by
simp only [Pi.uniformity, PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist, comap_iInf, gt_iff_lt,
preimage_setOf_eq, comap_principal, edist_pi_def]
rw [iInf_comm]; congr; funext ε
rw [iInf_comm]; congr; funext εpos
simp [setOf_forall, εpos]
#align pseudo_emetric_space_pi pseudoEMetricSpacePi
end Pi
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
/-- `EMetric.ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `edist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) : Set α :=
{ y | edist y x < ε }
#align emetric.ball EMetric.ball
@[simp] theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ edist y x < ε := Iff.rfl
#align emetric.mem_ball EMetric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ edist x y < ε := by rw [edist_comm, mem_ball]
#align emetric.mem_ball' EMetric.mem_ball'
/-- `EMetric.closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `edist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :=
{ y | edist y x ≤ ε }
#align emetric.closed_ball EMetric.closedBall
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ edist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
#align emetric.mem_closed_ball EMetric.mem_closedBall
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ edist x y ≤ ε := by rw [edist_comm, mem_closedBall]
#align emetric.mem_closed_ball' EMetric.mem_closedBall'
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_top (x : α) : closedBall x ∞ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => mem_setOf.2 le_top
#align emetric.closed_ball_top EMetric.closedBall_top
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ h => le_of_lt h.out
#align emetric.ball_subset_closed_ball EMetric.ball_subset_closedBall
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) hy
#align emetric.pos_of_mem_ball EMetric.pos_of_mem_ball
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, edist_self]
#align emetric.mem_ball_self EMetric.mem_ball_self
theorem mem_closedBall_self : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall, edist_self]; apply zero_le
#align emetric.mem_closed_ball_self EMetric.mem_closedBall_self
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
#align emetric.mem_ball_comm EMetric.mem_ball_comm
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
#align emetric.mem_closed_ball_comm EMetric.mem_closedBall_comm
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y (yx : _ < ε₁) =>
lt_of_lt_of_le yx h
#align emetric.ball_subset_ball EMetric.ball_subset_ball
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
#align emetric.closed_ball_subset_closed_ball EMetric.closedBall_subset_closedBall
theorem ball_disjoint (h : ε₁ + ε₂ ≤ edist x y) : Disjoint (ball x ε₁) (ball y ε₂) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun z h₁ h₂ =>
(edist_triangle_left x y z).not_lt <| (ENNReal.add_lt_add h₁ h₂).trans_le h
#align emetric.ball_disjoint EMetric.ball_disjoint
theorem ball_subset (h : edist x y + ε₁ ≤ ε₂) (h' : edist x y ≠ ∞) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ :=
fun z zx =>
calc
edist z y ≤ edist z x + edist x y := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ = edist x y + edist z x := add_comm _ _
_ < edist x y + ε₁ := ENNReal.add_lt_add_left h' zx
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
#align emetric.ball_subset EMetric.ball_subset
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε := by
have : 0 < ε - edist y x := by simpa using h
refine ⟨ε - edist y x, this, ball_subset ?_ (ne_top_of_lt h)⟩
exact (add_tsub_cancel_of_le (mem_ball.mp h).le).le
#align emetric.exists_ball_subset_ball EMetric.exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_eq_empty_iff : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε = 0 :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun h => le_bot_iff.1 (le_of_not_gt fun ε0 => h _ (mem_ball_self ε0)), fun ε0 _ h =>
not_lt_of_le (le_of_eq ε0) (pos_of_mem_ball h)⟩
#align emetric.ball_eq_empty_iff EMetric.ball_eq_empty_iff
theorem ordConnected_setOf_closedBall_subset (x : α) (s : Set α) :
OrdConnected { r | closedBall x r ⊆ s } :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h₁ _ h₂ => (closedBall_subset_closedBall h₂.2).trans h₁⟩
#align emetric.ord_connected_set_of_closed_ball_subset EMetric.ordConnected_setOf_closedBall_subset
theorem ordConnected_setOf_ball_subset (x : α) (s : Set α) : OrdConnected { r | ball x r ⊆ s } :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h₁ _ h₂ => (ball_subset_ball h₂.2).trans h₁⟩
#align emetric.ord_connected_set_of_ball_subset EMetric.ordConnected_setOf_ball_subset
/-- Relation “two points are at a finite edistance” is an equivalence relation. -/
def edistLtTopSetoid : Setoid α where
r x y := edist x y < ⊤
iseqv :=
⟨fun x => by rw [edist_self]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top,
fun h => by rwa [edist_comm], fun hxy hyz =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (edist_triangle _ _ _) (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hxy, hyz⟩)⟩
#align emetric.edist_lt_top_setoid EMetric.edistLtTopSetoid
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [EMetric.ball_eq_empty_iff]
#align emetric.ball_zero EMetric.ball_zero
theorem nhds_basis_eball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_edist
#align emetric.nhds_basis_eball EMetric.nhds_basis_eball
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_eball : (𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_eball s
#align emetric.nhds_within_basis_eball EMetric.nhdsWithin_basis_eball
theorem nhds_basis_closed_eball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_edist_le
#align emetric.nhds_basis_closed_eball EMetric.nhds_basis_closed_eball
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_closed_eball :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => closedBall x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_closed_eball s
#align emetric.nhds_within_basis_closed_eball EMetric.nhdsWithin_basis_closed_eball
theorem nhds_eq : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (ball x ε) :=
nhds_basis_eball.eq_biInf
#align emetric.nhds_eq EMetric.nhds_eq
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_eball.mem_iff
#align emetric.mem_nhds_iff EMetric.mem_nhds_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_eball.mem_iff
#align emetric.mem_nhds_within_iff EMetric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff
section
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin {t : Set β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → edist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ edist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_eball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_eball).trans <|
forall₂_congr fun ε _ => exists_congr fun δ => and_congr_right fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun x => by simp; tauto
#align emetric.tendsto_nhds_within_nhds_within EMetric.tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → edist x a < δ → edist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and_iff]
#align emetric.tendsto_nhds_within_nhds EMetric.tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, edist x a < δ → edist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_eball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_eball
#align emetric.tendsto_nhds_nhds EMetric.tendsto_nhds_nhds
end
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp [isOpen_iff_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
#align emetric.is_open_iff EMetric.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
#align emetric.is_open_ball EMetric.isOpen_ball
theorem isClosed_ball_top : IsClosed (ball x ⊤) :=
isOpen_compl_iff.1 <| isOpen_iff.2 fun _y hy =>
⟨⊤, ENNReal.coe_lt_top, fun _z hzy hzx =>
hy (edistLtTopSetoid.trans (edistLtTopSetoid.symm hzy) hzx)⟩
#align emetric.is_closed_ball_top EMetric.isClosed_ball_top
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
#align emetric.ball_mem_nhds EMetric.ball_mem_nhds
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
#align emetric.closed_ball_mem_nhds EMetric.closedBall_mem_nhds
theorem ball_prod_same [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
ball x r ×ˢ ball y r = ball (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.edist_eq]
#align emetric.ball_prod_same EMetric.ball_prod_same
theorem closedBall_prod_same [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
closedBall x r ×ˢ closedBall y r = closedBall (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.edist_eq]
#align emetric.closed_ball_prod_same EMetric.closedBall_prod_same
/-- ε-characterization of the closure in pseudoemetric spaces -/
theorem mem_closure_iff : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < ε :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_eball).trans <| by simp only [mem_ball, edist_comm x]
#align emetric.mem_closure_iff EMetric.mem_closure_iff
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, edist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_eball.tendsto_right_iff
#align emetric.tendsto_nhds EMetric.tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, edist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_eball).trans <| by
simp only [exists_prop, true_and_iff, mem_Ici, mem_ball]
#align emetric.tendsto_at_top EMetric.tendsto_atTop
theorem inseparable_iff : Inseparable x y ↔ edist x y = 0 := by
simp [inseparable_iff_mem_closure, mem_closure_iff, edist_comm, forall_lt_iff_le']
#align emetric.inseparable_iff EMetric.inseparable_iff
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- In a pseudoemetric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the pseudoedistance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff
#align emetric.cauchy_seq_iff EMetric.cauchySeq_iff
/-- A variation around the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff'
#align emetric.cauchy_seq_iff' EMetric.cauchySeq_iff'
/-- A variation of the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences that deals with
`ℝ≥0` upper bounds. -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff_NNReal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal.cauchySeq_iff'
#align emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_nnreal EMetric.cauchySeq_iff_NNReal
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
#align emetric.totally_bounded_iff EMetric.totallyBounded_iff
theorem totallyBounded_iff' {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => (totallyBounded_iff_subset.1 H) _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, _, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
#align emetric.totally_bounded_iff' EMetric.totallyBounded_iff'
section Compact
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to a uniform space with metrizable uniformity
/-- For a set `s` in a pseudo emetric space, if for every `ε > 0` there exists a countable
set that is `ε`-dense in `s`, then there exists a countable subset `t ⊆ s` that is dense in `s`. -/
theorem subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set (s : Set α)
(hs : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨x₀, hx₀⟩)
· exact ⟨∅, empty_subset _, countable_empty, empty_subset _⟩
choose! T hTc hsT using fun n : ℕ => hs n⁻¹ (by simp)
have : ∀ r x, ∃ y ∈ s, closedBall x r ∩ s ⊆ closedBall y (r * 2) := fun r x => by
rcases (closedBall x r ∩ s).eq_empty_or_nonempty with (he | ⟨y, hxy, hys⟩)
· refine ⟨x₀, hx₀, ?_⟩
rw [he]
exact empty_subset _
· refine ⟨y, hys, fun z hz => ?_⟩
calc
edist z y ≤ edist z x + edist y x := edist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ r + r := add_le_add hz.1 hxy
_ = r * 2 := (mul_two r).symm
choose f hfs hf using this
refine
⟨⋃ n : ℕ, f n⁻¹ '' T n, iUnion_subset fun n => image_subset_iff.2 fun z _ => hfs _ _,
countable_iUnion fun n => (hTc n).image _, ?_⟩
refine fun x hx => mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt (ENNReal.half_pos ε0.lt.ne').ne' with ⟨n, hn⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hsT n hx) with ⟨y, hyn, hyx⟩
refine ⟨f n⁻¹ y, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, mem_image_of_mem _ hyn⟩, ?_⟩
calc
edist x (f n⁻¹ y) ≤ (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * 2 := hf _ _ ⟨hyx, hx⟩
_ < ε := ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div hn
#align emetric.subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set EMetric.subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set
open TopologicalSpace in
/-- If a set `s` is separable in a (pseudo extended) metric space, then it admits a countable dense
subset. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` given by the definition
of separability does not need in general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem _root_.TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.exists_countable_dense_subset
{s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := fun ε ε0 => by
rcases hs with ⟨t, htc, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, htc, hst.trans fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 hx ε ε0 with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
exact mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, hyt, mem_closedBall.2 hxy.le⟩
exact subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set _ this
open TopologicalSpace in
/-- If a set `s` is separable, then the corresponding subtype is separable in a (pseudo extended)
metric space. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` does not need in
general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem _root_.TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.separableSpace {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
SeparableSpace s := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, hst⟩
lift t to Set s using hts
refine ⟨⟨t, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn htc, ?_⟩⟩
rwa [inducing_subtype_val.dense_iff, Subtype.forall]
#align topological_space.is_separable.separable_space TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.separableSpace
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to metrizable spaces
/-- A compact set in a pseudo emetric space is separable, i.e., it is a subset of the closure of a
countable set. -/
theorem subset_countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
refine subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set s fun ε hε => ?_
rcases totallyBounded_iff'.1 hs.totallyBounded ε hε with ⟨t, -, htf, hst⟩
exact ⟨t, htf.countable, hst.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => ball_subset_closedBall⟩
#align emetric.subset_countable_closure_of_compact EMetric.subset_countable_closure_of_compact
end Compact
section SecondCountable
open TopologicalSpace
variable (α)
/-- A sigma compact pseudo emetric space has second countable topology. -/
instance (priority := 90) secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SigmaCompactSpace α] :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α by exact UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
choose T _ hTc hsubT using fun n =>
subset_countable_closure_of_compact (isCompact_compactCovering α n)
refine ⟨⟨⋃ n, T n, countable_iUnion hTc, fun x => ?_⟩⟩
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (iUnion_compactCovering α) x with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ n) (hsubT _ hn)
#align emetric.second_countable_of_sigma_compact EMetric.secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact
variable {α}
theorem secondCountable_of_almost_dense_set
(hs : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε = univ) :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α from UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, Set.Countable t ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := by
simpa only [univ_subset_iff] using hs
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set (univ : Set α) this with ⟨t, -, htc, ht⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, htc, fun x => ht (mem_univ x)⟩⟩
#align emetric.second_countable_of_almost_dense_set EMetric.secondCountable_of_almost_dense_set
end SecondCountable
section Diam
/-- The diameter of a set in a pseudoemetric space, named `EMetric.diam` -/
noncomputable def diam (s : Set α) :=
⨆ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), edist x y
#align emetric.diam EMetric.diam
theorem diam_eq_sSup (s : Set α) : diam s = sSup (image2 edist s s) := sSup_image2.symm
theorem diam_le_iff {d : ℝ≥0∞} : diam s ≤ d ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, edist x y ≤ d := by
simp only [diam, iSup_le_iff]
#align emetric.diam_le_iff EMetric.diam_le_iff
theorem diam_image_le_iff {d : ℝ≥0∞} {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
diam (f '' s) ≤ d ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ d := by
simp only [diam_le_iff, forall_mem_image]
#align emetric.diam_image_le_iff EMetric.diam_image_le_iff
theorem edist_le_of_diam_le {d} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (hd : diam s ≤ d) : edist x y ≤ d :=
diam_le_iff.1 hd x hx y hy
#align emetric.edist_le_of_diam_le EMetric.edist_le_of_diam_le
/-- If two points belong to some set, their edistance is bounded by the diameter of the set -/
theorem edist_le_diam_of_mem (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : edist x y ≤ diam s :=
edist_le_of_diam_le hx hy le_rfl
#align emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem
/-- If the distance between any two points in a set is bounded by some constant, this constant
bounds the diameter. -/
theorem diam_le {d : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, edist x y ≤ d) : diam s ≤ d :=
diam_le_iff.2 h
#align emetric.diam_le EMetric.diam_le
/-- The diameter of a subsingleton vanishes. -/
theorem diam_subsingleton (hs : s.Subsingleton) : diam s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| diam_le fun _x hx y hy => (hs hx hy).symm ▸ edist_self y ▸ le_rfl
#align emetric.diam_subsingleton EMetric.diam_subsingleton
/-- The diameter of the empty set vanishes -/
@[simp]
theorem diam_empty : diam (∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_subsingleton subsingleton_empty
#align emetric.diam_empty EMetric.diam_empty
/-- The diameter of a singleton vanishes -/
@[simp]
theorem diam_singleton : diam ({x} : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_subsingleton subsingleton_singleton
#align emetric.diam_singleton EMetric.diam_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem diam_one [One α] : diam (1 : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_singleton
#align emetric.diam_one EMetric.diam_one
#align emetric.diam_zero EMetric.diam_zero
theorem diam_iUnion_mem_option {ι : Type*} (o : Option ι) (s : ι → Set α) :
diam (⋃ i ∈ o, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ o, diam (s i) := by cases o <;> simp
#align emetric.diam_Union_mem_option EMetric.diam_iUnion_mem_option
theorem diam_insert : diam (insert x s) = max (⨆ y ∈ s, edist x y) (diam s) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
simp only [diam_le_iff, forall_mem_insert, edist_self, edist_comm x, max_le_iff, iSup_le_iff,
zero_le, true_and_iff, forall_and, and_self_iff, ← and_assoc]
#align emetric.diam_insert EMetric.diam_insert
theorem diam_pair : diam ({x, y} : Set α) = edist x y := by
simp only [iSup_singleton, diam_insert, diam_singleton, ENNReal.max_zero_right]
#align emetric.diam_pair EMetric.diam_pair
theorem diam_triple : diam ({x, y, z} : Set α) = max (max (edist x y) (edist x z)) (edist y z) := by
simp only [diam_insert, iSup_insert, iSup_singleton, diam_singleton, ENNReal.max_zero_right,
ENNReal.sup_eq_max]
#align emetric.diam_triple EMetric.diam_triple
/-- The diameter is monotonous with respect to inclusion -/
@[gcongr]
theorem diam_mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : diam s ≤ diam t :=
diam_le fun _x hx _y hy => edist_le_diam_of_mem (h hx) (h hy)
#align emetric.diam_mono EMetric.diam_mono
/-- The diameter of a union is controlled by the diameter of the sets, and the edistance
between two points in the sets. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 977 | 995 | theorem diam_union {t : Set α} (xs : x ∈ s) (yt : y ∈ t) :
diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + edist x y + diam t := by |
have A : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, edist a b ≤ diam s + edist x y + diam t := fun a ha b hb =>
calc
edist a b ≤ edist a x + edist x y + edist y b := edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
_ ≤ diam s + edist x y + diam t :=
add_le_add (add_le_add (edist_le_diam_of_mem ha xs) le_rfl) (edist_le_diam_of_mem yt hb)
refine diam_le fun a ha b hb => ?_
cases' (mem_union _ _ _).1 ha with h'a h'a <;> cases' (mem_union _ _ _).1 hb with h'b h'b
· calc
edist a b ≤ diam s := edist_le_diam_of_mem h'a h'b
_ ≤ diam s + (edist x y + diam t) := le_self_add
_ = diam s + edist x y + diam t := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
· exact A a h'a b h'b
· have Z := A b h'b a h'a
rwa [edist_comm] at Z
· calc
edist a b ≤ diam t := edist_le_diam_of_mem h'a h'b
_ ≤ diam s + edist x y + diam t := le_add_self
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Spectral.Hom
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Limits
#align_import algebraic_geometry.morphisms.quasi_compact from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5dc6092d09e5e489106865241986f7f2ad28d4c8"
/-!
# Quasi-compact morphisms
A morphism of schemes is quasi-compact if the preimages of quasi-compact open sets are
quasi-compact.
It suffices to check that preimages of affine open sets are compact
(`quasiCompact_iff_forall_affine`).
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
/--
A morphism is "quasi-compact" if the underlying map of topological spaces is, i.e. if the preimages
of quasi-compact open sets are quasi-compact.
-/
@[mk_iff]
class QuasiCompact (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- Preimage of compact open set under a quasi-compact morphism between schemes is compact. -/
isCompact_preimage : ∀ U : Set Y.carrier, IsOpen U → IsCompact U → IsCompact (f.1.base ⁻¹' U)
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiCompact
theorem quasiCompact_iff_spectral : QuasiCompact f ↔ IsSpectralMap f.1.base :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by continuity, h⟩, fun h => ⟨h.2⟩⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_iff_spectral AlgebraicGeometry.quasiCompact_iff_spectral
/-- The `AffineTargetMorphismProperty` corresponding to `QuasiCompact`, asserting that the
domain is a quasi-compact scheme. -/
def QuasiCompact.affineProperty : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun X _ _ _ =>
CompactSpace X.carrier
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact.affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiCompact.affineProperty
instance (priority := 900) quasiCompactOfIsIso {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
QuasiCompact f := by
constructor
intro U _ hU'
convert hU'.image (inv f.1.base).continuous_toFun using 1
rw [Set.image_eq_preimage_of_inverse]
· delta Function.LeftInverse
exact IsIso.inv_hom_id_apply f.1.base
· exact IsIso.hom_inv_id_apply f.1.base
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_of_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.quasiCompactOfIsIso
instance quasiCompactComp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiCompact f]
[QuasiCompact g] : QuasiCompact (f ≫ g) := by
constructor
intro U hU hU'
rw [Scheme.comp_val_base, TopCat.coe_comp, Set.preimage_comp]
apply QuasiCompact.isCompact_preimage
· exact Continuous.isOpen_preimage (by
-- Porting note: `continuity` failed
-- see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5030
exact Scheme.Hom.continuous g) _ hU
apply QuasiCompact.isCompact_preimage <;> assumption
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_comp AlgebraicGeometry.quasiCompactComp
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/QuasiCompact.lean | 80 | 86 | theorem isCompact_open_iff_eq_finset_affine_union {X : Scheme} (U : Set X.carrier) :
IsCompact U ∧ IsOpen U ↔
∃ s : Set X.affineOpens, s.Finite ∧ U = ⋃ (i : X.affineOpens) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by |
apply Opens.IsBasis.isCompact_open_iff_eq_finite_iUnion
(fun (U : X.affineOpens) => (U : Opens X.carrier))
· rw [Subtype.range_coe]; exact isBasis_affine_open X
· exact fun i => i.2.isCompact
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.InjSurj
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.congruence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f39bcbc98f8255490f8d4562762c9467694c809"
/-!
# Congruence relations on rings
This file defines congruence relations on rings, which extend `Con` and `AddCon` on monoids and
additive monoids.
Most of the time you likely want to use the `Ideal.Quotient` API that is built on top of this.
## Main Definitions
* `RingCon R`: the type of congruence relations respecting `+` and `*`.
* `RingConGen r`: the inductively defined smallest ring congruence relation containing a given
binary relation.
## TODO
* Use this for `RingQuot` too.
* Copy across more API from `Con` and `AddCon` in `GroupTheory/Congruence.lean`.
-/
/-- A congruence relation on a type with an addition and multiplication is an equivalence relation
which preserves both. -/
structure RingCon (R : Type*) [Add R] [Mul R] extends Con R, AddCon R where
#align ring_con RingCon
/-- The induced multiplicative congruence from a `RingCon`. -/
add_decl_doc RingCon.toCon
/-- The induced additive congruence from a `RingCon`. -/
add_decl_doc RingCon.toAddCon
variable {α R : Type*}
/-- The inductively defined smallest ring congruence relation containing a given binary
relation. -/
inductive RingConGen.Rel [Add R] [Mul R] (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of : ∀ x y, r x y → RingConGen.Rel r x y
| refl : ∀ x, RingConGen.Rel r x x
| symm : ∀ {x y}, RingConGen.Rel r x y → RingConGen.Rel r y x
| trans : ∀ {x y z}, RingConGen.Rel r x y → RingConGen.Rel r y z → RingConGen.Rel r x z
| add : ∀ {w x y z}, RingConGen.Rel r w x → RingConGen.Rel r y z →
RingConGen.Rel r (w + y) (x + z)
| mul : ∀ {w x y z}, RingConGen.Rel r w x → RingConGen.Rel r y z →
RingConGen.Rel r (w * y) (x * z)
#align ring_con_gen.rel RingConGen.Rel
/-- The inductively defined smallest ring congruence relation containing a given binary
relation. -/
def ringConGen [Add R] [Mul R] (r : R → R → Prop) : RingCon R where
r := RingConGen.Rel r
iseqv := ⟨RingConGen.Rel.refl, @RingConGen.Rel.symm _ _ _ _, @RingConGen.Rel.trans _ _ _ _⟩
add' := RingConGen.Rel.add
mul' := RingConGen.Rel.mul
#align ring_con_gen ringConGen
namespace RingCon
section Basic
variable [Add R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R)
-- Porting note: upgrade to `FunLike`
/-- A coercion from a congruence relation to its underlying binary relation. -/
instance : FunLike (RingCon R) R (R → Prop) :=
{ coe := fun c => c.r,
coe_injective' := fun x y h => by
rcases x with ⟨⟨x, _⟩, _⟩
rcases y with ⟨⟨y, _⟩, _⟩
congr!
rw [Setoid.ext_iff,(show x.Rel = y.Rel from h)]
simp}
theorem rel_eq_coe : c.r = c :=
rfl
#align ring_con.rel_eq_coe RingCon.rel_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem toCon_coe_eq_coe : (c.toCon : R → R → Prop) = c :=
rfl
protected theorem refl (x) : c x x :=
c.refl' x
#align ring_con.refl RingCon.refl
protected theorem symm {x y} : c x y → c y x :=
c.symm'
#align ring_con.symm RingCon.symm
protected theorem trans {x y z} : c x y → c y z → c x z :=
c.trans'
#align ring_con.trans RingCon.trans
protected theorem add {w x y z} : c w x → c y z → c (w + y) (x + z) :=
c.add'
#align ring_con.add RingCon.add
protected theorem mul {w x y z} : c w x → c y z → c (w * y) (x * z) :=
c.mul'
#align ring_con.mul RingCon.mul
instance : Inhabited (RingCon R) :=
⟨ringConGen EmptyRelation⟩
@[simp]
theorem rel_mk {s : Con R} {h a b} : RingCon.mk s h a b ↔ s a b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The map sending a congruence relation to its underlying binary relation is injective. -/
theorem ext' {c d : RingCon R} (H : ⇑c = ⇑d) : c = d := DFunLike.coe_injective H
/-- Extensionality rule for congruence relations. -/
theorem ext {c d : RingCon R} (H : ∀ x y, c x y ↔ d x y) : c = d :=
ext' <| by ext; apply H
end Basic
section Quotient
section Basic
variable [Add R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R)
/-- Defining the quotient by a congruence relation of a type with addition and multiplication. -/
protected def Quotient :=
Quotient c.toSetoid
#align ring_con.quotient RingCon.Quotient
variable {c}
/-- The morphism into the quotient by a congruence relation -/
@[coe] def toQuotient (r : R) : c.Quotient :=
@Quotient.mk'' _ c.toSetoid r
variable (c)
/-- Coercion from a type with addition and multiplication to its quotient by a congruence relation.
See Note [use has_coe_t]. -/
instance : CoeTC R c.Quotient :=
⟨toQuotient⟩
-- Lower the priority since it unifies with any quotient type.
/-- The quotient by a decidable congruence relation has decidable equality. -/
instance (priority := 500) [_d : ∀ a b, Decidable (c a b)] : DecidableEq c.Quotient :=
inferInstanceAs (DecidableEq (Quotient c.toSetoid))
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_eq_coe (x : R) : Quot.mk c x = (x : c.Quotient) :=
rfl
#align ring_con.quot_mk_eq_coe RingCon.quot_mk_eq_coe
/-- Two elements are related by a congruence relation `c` iff they are represented by the same
element of the quotient by `c`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem eq {a b : R} : (a : c.Quotient) = (b : c.Quotient) ↔ c a b :=
Quotient.eq''
#align ring_con.eq RingCon.eq
end Basic
/-! ### Basic notation
The basic algebraic notation, `0`, `1`, `+`, `*`, `-`, `^`, descend naturally under the quotient
-/
section Data
section add_mul
variable [Add R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R)
instance : Add c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (Add c.toAddCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : R) : (↑(x + y) : c.Quotient) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_add RingCon.coe_add
instance : Mul c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (Mul c.toCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : R) : (↑(x * y) : c.Quotient) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_mul RingCon.coe_mul
end add_mul
section Zero
variable [AddZeroClass R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R)
instance : Zero c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (Zero c.toAddCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : R) : c.Quotient) = 0 :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_zero RingCon.coe_zero
end Zero
section One
variable [Add R] [MulOneClass R] (c : RingCon R)
instance : One c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (One c.toCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : (↑(1 : R) : c.Quotient) = 1 :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_one RingCon.coe_one
end One
section SMul
variable [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R] (c : RingCon R)
instance : SMul α c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (SMul α c.toCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (a : α) (x : R) : (↑(a • x) : c.Quotient) = a • (x : c.Quotient) :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_smul RingCon.coe_smul
end SMul
section NegSubZSMul
variable [AddGroup R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R)
instance : Neg c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (Neg c.toAddCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (x : R) : (↑(-x) : c.Quotient) = -x :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_neg RingCon.coe_neg
instance : Sub c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (Sub c.toAddCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (x y : R) : (↑(x - y) : c.Quotient) = x - y :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_sub RingCon.coe_sub
instance hasZSMul : SMul ℤ c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (SMul ℤ c.toAddCon.Quotient)
#align ring_con.has_zsmul RingCon.hasZSMul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : R) : (↑(z • x) : c.Quotient) = z • (x : c.Quotient) :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_zsmul RingCon.coe_zsmul
end NegSubZSMul
section NSMul
variable [AddMonoid R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R)
instance hasNSMul : SMul ℕ c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (SMul ℕ c.toAddCon.Quotient)
#align ring_con.has_nsmul RingCon.hasNSMul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : R) : (↑(n • x) : c.Quotient) = n • (x : c.Quotient) :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_nsmul RingCon.coe_nsmul
end NSMul
section Pow
variable [Add R] [Monoid R] (c : RingCon R)
instance : Pow c.Quotient ℕ := inferInstanceAs (Pow c.toCon.Quotient ℕ)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : R) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : c.Quotient) = (x : c.Quotient) ^ n :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_pow RingCon.coe_pow
end Pow
section NatCast
variable [AddMonoidWithOne R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R)
instance : NatCast c.Quotient :=
⟨fun n => ↑(n : R)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : (↑(n : R) : c.Quotient) = n :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_nat_cast RingCon.coe_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_nat_cast := coe_natCast
end NatCast
section IntCast
variable [AddGroupWithOne R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R)
instance : IntCast c.Quotient :=
⟨fun z => ↑(z : R)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (n : ℕ) : (↑(n : R) : c.Quotient) = n :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_int_cast RingCon.coe_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_int_cast := coe_intCast
end IntCast
instance [Inhabited R] [Add R] [Mul R] (c : RingCon R) : Inhabited c.Quotient :=
⟨↑(default : R)⟩
end Data
/-! ### Algebraic structure
The operations above on the quotient by `c : RingCon R` preserve the algebraic structure of `R`.
-/
section Algebraic
instance [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (c : RingCon R) : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [NonAssocSemiring R] (c : RingCon R) : NonAssocSemiring c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.nonAssocSemiring _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance [NonUnitalSemiring R] (c : RingCon R) : NonUnitalSemiring c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.nonUnitalSemiring _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [Semiring R] (c : RingCon R) : Semiring c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.semiring _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance [CommSemiring R] (c : RingCon R) : CommSemiring c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.commSemiring _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] (c : RingCon R) : NonUnitalNonAssocRing c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.nonUnitalNonAssocRing _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [NonAssocRing R] (c : RingCon R) : NonAssocRing c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.nonAssocRing _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance [NonUnitalRing R] (c : RingCon R) : NonUnitalRing c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.nonUnitalRing _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [Ring R] (c : RingCon R) : Ring c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.ring _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance [CommRing R] (c : RingCon R) : CommRing c.Quotient :=
Function.Surjective.commRing _ Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk'' rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance isScalarTower_right [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
(c : RingCon R) : IsScalarTower α c.Quotient c.Quotient where
smul_assoc _ := Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_mul_assoc _ _ _
#align ring_con.is_scalar_tower_right RingCon.isScalarTower_right
instance smulCommClass [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
[SMulCommClass α R R] (c : RingCon R) : SMulCommClass α c.Quotient c.Quotient where
smul_comm _ := Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| (mul_smul_comm _ _ _).symm
#align ring_con.smul_comm_class RingCon.smulCommClass
instance smulCommClass' [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
[SMulCommClass R α R] (c : RingCon R) : SMulCommClass c.Quotient α c.Quotient :=
haveI := SMulCommClass.symm R α R
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
#align ring_con.smul_comm_class' RingCon.smulCommClass'
instance [Monoid α] [NonAssocSemiring R] [DistribMulAction α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
(c : RingCon R) : DistribMulAction α c.Quotient :=
{ c.toCon.mulAction with
smul_zero := fun _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_zero _
smul_add := fun _ => Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_add _ _ _ }
instance [Monoid α] [Semiring R] [MulSemiringAction α R] [IsScalarTower α R R] (c : RingCon R) :
MulSemiringAction α c.Quotient :=
{ smul_one := fun _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_one _
smul_mul := fun _ => Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg toQuotient <|
MulSemiringAction.smul_mul _ _ _ }
end Algebraic
/-- The natural homomorphism from a ring to its quotient by a congruence relation. -/
def mk' [NonAssocSemiring R] (c : RingCon R) : R →+* c.Quotient where
toFun := toQuotient
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align ring_con.mk' RingCon.mk'
end Quotient
/-! ### Lattice structure
The API in this section is copied from `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Congruence.lean`
-/
section Lattice
variable [Add R] [Mul R]
/-- For congruence relations `c, d` on a type `M` with multiplication and addition, `c ≤ d` iff
`∀ x y ∈ M`, `x` is related to `y` by `d` if `x` is related to `y` by `c`. -/
instance : LE (RingCon R) where
le c d := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, c x y → d x y
/-- Definition of `≤` for congruence relations. -/
theorem le_def {c d : RingCon R} : c ≤ d ↔ ∀ {x y}, c x y → d x y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations on a given type with multiplication and
addition. -/
instance : InfSet (RingCon R) where
sInf S :=
{ r := fun x y => ∀ c : RingCon R, c ∈ S → c x y
iseqv :=
⟨fun x c _hc => c.refl x, fun h c hc => c.symm <| h c hc, fun h1 h2 c hc =>
c.trans (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc⟩
add' := fun h1 h2 c hc => c.add (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc
mul' := fun h1 h2 c hc => c.mul (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc }
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the infimum of the set's image
under the map to the underlying equivalence relation. -/
theorem sInf_toSetoid (S : Set (RingCon R)) : (sInf S).toSetoid = sInf ((·.toSetoid) '' S) :=
Setoid.ext' fun x y =>
⟨fun h r ⟨c, hS, hr⟩ => by rw [← hr]; exact h c hS, fun h c hS => h c.toSetoid ⟨c, hS, rfl⟩⟩
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the infimum of the set's image
under the map to the underlying binary relation. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (RingCon R)) : ⇑(sInf S) = sInf ((⇑) '' S) := by
ext; simp only [sInf_image, iInf_apply, iInf_Prop_eq]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → RingCon R) : ⇑(iInf f) = ⨅ i, ⇑(f i) := by
rw [iInf, coe_sInf, ← Set.range_comp, sInf_range, Function.comp]
instance : PartialOrder (RingCon R) where
le_refl _c _ _ := id
le_trans _c1 _c2 _c3 h1 h2 _x _y h := h2 <| h1 h
le_antisymm _c _d hc hd := ext fun _x _y => ⟨fun h => hc h, fun h => hd h⟩
/-- The complete lattice of congruence relations on a given type with multiplication and
addition. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (RingCon R) where
__ := completeLatticeOfInf (RingCon R) fun s =>
⟨fun r hr x y h => (h : ∀ r ∈ s, (r : RingCon R) x y) r hr,
fun _r hr _x _y h _r' hr' => hr hr' h⟩
inf c d :=
{ toSetoid := c.toSetoid ⊓ d.toSetoid
mul' := fun h1 h2 => ⟨c.mul h1.1 h2.1, d.mul h1.2 h2.2⟩
add' := fun h1 h2 => ⟨c.add h1.1 h2.1, d.add h1.2 h2.2⟩ }
inf_le_left _ _ := fun _ _ h => h.1
inf_le_right _ _ := fun _ _ h => h.2
le_inf _ _ _ hb hc := fun _ _ h => ⟨hb h, hc h⟩
top :=
{ (⊤ : Setoid R) with
mul' := fun _ _ => trivial
add' := fun _ _ => trivial }
le_top _ := fun _ _ _h => trivial
bot :=
{ (⊥ : Setoid R) with
mul' := congr_arg₂ _
add' := congr_arg₂ _ }
bot_le c := fun x _y h => h ▸ c.refl x
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ⇑(⊤ : RingCon R) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : RingCon R) = Eq := rfl
/-- The infimum of two congruence relations equals the infimum of the underlying binary
operations. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf {c d : RingCon R} : ⇑(c ⊓ d) = ⇑c ⊓ ⇑d := rfl
/-- Definition of the infimum of two congruence relations. -/
theorem inf_iff_and {c d : RingCon R} {x y} : (c ⊓ d) x y ↔ c x y ∧ d x y :=
Iff.rfl
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (RingCon R) where
exists_pair_ne :=
let ⟨x, y, ne⟩ := exists_pair_ne R
⟨⊥, ⊤, ne_of_apply_ne (· x y) <| by simp [ne]⟩
/-- The inductively defined smallest congruence relation containing a binary relation `r` equals
the infimum of the set of congruence relations containing `r`. -/
theorem ringConGen_eq (r : R → R → Prop) :
ringConGen r = sInf {s : RingCon R | ∀ x y, r x y → s x y} :=
le_antisymm
(fun _x _y H =>
RingConGen.Rel.recOn H (fun _ _ h _ hs => hs _ _ h) (RingCon.refl _)
(fun _ => RingCon.symm _) (fun _ _ => RingCon.trans _)
(fun _ _ h1 h2 c hc => c.add (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc)
(fun _ _ h1 h2 c hc => c.mul (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc))
(sInf_le fun _ _ => RingConGen.Rel.of _ _)
/-- The smallest congruence relation containing a binary relation `r` is contained in any
congruence relation containing `r`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Congruence.lean | 536 | 538 | theorem ringConGen_le {r : R → R → Prop} {c : RingCon R}
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → c x y) : ringConGen r ≤ c := by |
rw [ringConGen_eq]; exact sInf_le h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Midpoint
#align_import analysis.normed.group.add_torsor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"837f72de63ad6cd96519cde5f1ffd5ed8d280ad0"
/-!
# Torsors of additive normed group actions.
This file defines torsors of additive normed group actions, with a
metric space structure. The motivating case is Euclidean affine
spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal Topology
open Filter
/-- A `NormedAddTorsor V P` is a torsor of an additive seminormed group
action by a `SeminormedAddCommGroup V` on points `P`. We bundle the pseudometric space
structure and require the distance to be the same as results from the
norm (which in fact implies the distance yields a pseudometric space, but
bundling just the distance and using an instance for the pseudometric space
results in type class problems). -/
class NormedAddTorsor (V : outParam Type*) (P : Type*) [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[PseudoMetricSpace P] extends AddTorsor V P where
dist_eq_norm' : ∀ x y : P, dist x y = ‖(x -ᵥ y : V)‖
#align normed_add_torsor NormedAddTorsor
/-- Shortcut instance to help typeclass inference out. -/
instance (priority := 100) NormedAddTorsor.toAddTorsor' {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V]
[MetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor V P] : AddTorsor V P :=
NormedAddTorsor.toAddTorsor
#align normed_add_torsor.to_add_torsor' NormedAddTorsor.toAddTorsor'
variable {α V P W Q : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [PseudoMetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor V P]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [MetricSpace Q] [NormedAddTorsor W Q]
instance (priority := 100) NormedAddTorsor.to_isometricVAdd : IsometricVAdd V P :=
⟨fun c => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun x y => by
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [NormedAddTorsor.dist_eq_norm']`
rw [NormedAddTorsor.dist_eq_norm', NormedAddTorsor.dist_eq_norm', vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]⟩
#align normed_add_torsor.to_has_isometric_vadd NormedAddTorsor.to_isometricVAdd
/-- A `SeminormedAddCommGroup` is a `NormedAddTorsor` over itself. -/
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddTorsor : NormedAddTorsor V V where
dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.to_normed_add_torsor SeminormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddTorsor
-- Because of the AddTorsor.nonempty instance.
/-- A nonempty affine subspace of a `NormedAddTorsor` is itself a `NormedAddTorsor`. -/
instance AffineSubspace.toNormedAddTorsor {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Module R V]
(s : AffineSubspace R P) [Nonempty s] : NormedAddTorsor s.direction s :=
{ AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor s with
dist_eq_norm' := fun x y => NormedAddTorsor.dist_eq_norm' x.val y.val }
#align affine_subspace.to_normed_add_torsor AffineSubspace.toNormedAddTorsor
section
variable (V W)
/-- The distance equals the norm of subtracting two points. In this
lemma, it is necessary to have `V` as an explicit argument; otherwise
`rw dist_eq_norm_vsub` sometimes doesn't work. -/
theorem dist_eq_norm_vsub (x y : P) : dist x y = ‖x -ᵥ y‖ :=
NormedAddTorsor.dist_eq_norm' x y
#align dist_eq_norm_vsub dist_eq_norm_vsub
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_vsub (x y : P) : nndist x y = ‖x -ᵥ y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_vsub V x y
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_vsub nndist_eq_nnnorm_vsub
/-- The distance equals the norm of subtracting two points. In this
lemma, it is necessary to have `V` as an explicit argument; otherwise
`rw dist_eq_norm_vsub'` sometimes doesn't work. -/
theorem dist_eq_norm_vsub' (x y : P) : dist x y = ‖y -ᵥ x‖ :=
(dist_comm _ _).trans (dist_eq_norm_vsub _ _ _)
#align dist_eq_norm_vsub' dist_eq_norm_vsub'
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_vsub' (x y : P) : nndist x y = ‖y -ᵥ x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_vsub' V x y
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_vsub' nndist_eq_nnnorm_vsub'
end
theorem dist_vadd_cancel_left (v : V) (x y : P) : dist (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) = dist x y :=
dist_vadd _ _ _
#align dist_vadd_cancel_left dist_vadd_cancel_left
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem nndist_vadd_cancel_left (v : V) (x y : P) : nndist (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) = nndist x y :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_vadd_cancel_left _ _ _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/AddTorsor.lean | 104 | 105 | theorem dist_vadd_cancel_right (v₁ v₂ : V) (x : P) : dist (v₁ +ᵥ x) (v₂ +ᵥ x) = dist v₁ v₂ := by |
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Set
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Set
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.ULift
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
#align_import order.complete_lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5709b0d8725255e76f47debca6400c07b5c2d8e6"
/-!
# Theory of complete lattices
## Main definitions
* `sSup` and `sInf` are the supremum and the infimum of a set;
* `iSup (f : ι → α)` and `iInf (f : ι → α)` are indexed supremum and infimum of a function,
defined as `sSup` and `sInf` of the range of this function;
* class `CompleteLattice`: a bounded lattice such that `sSup s` is always the least upper boundary
of `s` and `sInf s` is always the greatest lower boundary of `s`;
* class `CompleteLinearOrder`: a linear ordered complete lattice.
## Naming conventions
In lemma names,
* `sSup` is called `sSup`
* `sInf` is called `sInf`
* `⨆ i, s i` is called `iSup`
* `⨅ i, s i` is called `iInf`
* `⨆ i j, s i j` is called `iSup₂`. This is an `iSup` inside an `iSup`.
* `⨅ i j, s i j` is called `iInf₂`. This is an `iInf` inside an `iInf`.
* `⨆ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biSup` for "bounded `iSup`". This is the special case of `iSup₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⨅ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInf` for "bounded `iInf`". This is the special case of `iInf₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⨆ i, f i` : `iSup f`, the supremum of the range of `f`;
* `⨅ i, f i` : `iInf f`, the infimum of the range of `f`.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β β₂ γ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
instance OrderDual.supSet (α) [InfSet α] : SupSet αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(sInf : Set α → α)⟩
instance OrderDual.infSet (α) [SupSet α] : InfSet αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(sSup : Set α → α)⟩
/-- Note that we rarely use `CompleteSemilatticeSup`
(in fact, any such object is always a `CompleteLattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
class CompleteSemilatticeSup (α : Type*) extends PartialOrder α, SupSet α where
/-- Any element of a set is less than the set supremum. -/
le_sSup : ∀ s, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ sSup s
/-- Any upper bound is more than the set supremum. -/
sSup_le : ∀ s a, (∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) → sSup s ≤ a
#align complete_semilattice_Sup CompleteSemilatticeSup
section
variable [CompleteSemilatticeSup α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_sSup : a ∈ s → a ≤ sSup s :=
CompleteSemilatticeSup.le_sSup s a
#align le_Sup le_sSup
theorem sSup_le : (∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) → sSup s ≤ a :=
CompleteSemilatticeSup.sSup_le s a
#align Sup_le sSup_le
theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set α) : IsLUB s (sSup s) :=
⟨fun _ ↦ le_sSup, fun _ ↦ sSup_le⟩
#align is_lub_Sup isLUB_sSup
lemma isLUB_iff_sSup_eq : IsLUB s a ↔ sSup s = a :=
⟨(isLUB_sSup s).unique, by rintro rfl; exact isLUB_sSup _⟩
alias ⟨IsLUB.sSup_eq, _⟩ := isLUB_iff_sSup_eq
#align is_lub.Sup_eq IsLUB.sSup_eq
theorem le_sSup_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ sSup s :=
le_trans h (le_sSup hb)
#align le_Sup_of_le le_sSup_of_le
@[gcongr]
theorem sSup_le_sSup (h : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
(isLUB_sSup s).mono (isLUB_sSup t) h
#align Sup_le_Sup sSup_le_sSup
@[simp]
theorem sSup_le_iff : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_sSup s)
#align Sup_le_iff sSup_le_iff
theorem le_sSup_iff : a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b ∈ upperBounds s, a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (sSup_le hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_sSup⟩
#align le_Sup_iff le_sSup_iff
theorem le_iSup_iff {s : ι → α} : a ≤ iSup s ↔ ∀ b, (∀ i, s i ≤ b) → a ≤ b := by
simp [iSup, le_sSup_iff, upperBounds]
#align le_supr_iff le_iSup_iff
theorem sSup_le_sSup_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
le_sSup_iff.2 fun _ hb =>
sSup_le fun a ha =>
let ⟨_, hct, hac⟩ := h a ha
hac.trans (hb hct)
#align Sup_le_Sup_of_forall_exists_le sSup_le_sSup_of_forall_exists_le
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csSup_singleton`.
theorem sSup_singleton {a : α} : sSup {a} = a :=
isLUB_singleton.sSup_eq
#align Sup_singleton sSup_singleton
end
/-- Note that we rarely use `CompleteSemilatticeInf`
(in fact, any such object is always a `CompleteLattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
class CompleteSemilatticeInf (α : Type*) extends PartialOrder α, InfSet α where
/-- Any element of a set is more than the set infimum. -/
sInf_le : ∀ s, ∀ a ∈ s, sInf s ≤ a
/-- Any lower bound is less than the set infimum. -/
le_sInf : ∀ s a, (∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ sInf s
#align complete_semilattice_Inf CompleteSemilatticeInf
section
variable [CompleteSemilatticeInf α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem sInf_le : a ∈ s → sInf s ≤ a :=
CompleteSemilatticeInf.sInf_le s a
#align Inf_le sInf_le
theorem le_sInf : (∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ sInf s :=
CompleteSemilatticeInf.le_sInf s a
#align le_Inf le_sInf
theorem isGLB_sInf (s : Set α) : IsGLB s (sInf s) :=
⟨fun _ => sInf_le, fun _ => le_sInf⟩
#align is_glb_Inf isGLB_sInf
lemma isGLB_iff_sInf_eq : IsGLB s a ↔ sInf s = a :=
⟨(isGLB_sInf s).unique, by rintro rfl; exact isGLB_sInf _⟩
alias ⟨IsGLB.sInf_eq, _⟩ := isGLB_iff_sInf_eq
#align is_glb.Inf_eq IsGLB.sInf_eq
theorem sInf_le_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : sInf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (sInf_le hb) h
#align Inf_le_of_le sInf_le_of_le
@[gcongr]
theorem sInf_le_sInf (h : s ⊆ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
(isGLB_sInf s).mono (isGLB_sInf t) h
#align Inf_le_Inf sInf_le_sInf
@[simp]
theorem le_sInf_iff : a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_isGLB_iff (isGLB_sInf s)
#align le_Inf_iff le_sInf_iff
theorem sInf_le_iff : sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lowerBounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans (le_sInf hb) h, fun hb => hb _ fun _ => sInf_le⟩
#align Inf_le_iff sInf_le_iff
theorem iInf_le_iff {s : ι → α} : iInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b, (∀ i, b ≤ s i) → b ≤ a := by
simp [iInf, sInf_le_iff, lowerBounds]
#align infi_le_iff iInf_le_iff
theorem sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
le_sInf fun x hx ↦ let ⟨_y, hyt, hyx⟩ := h x hx; sInf_le_of_le hyt hyx
#align Inf_le_Inf_of_forall_exists_le sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csInf_singleton`.
theorem sInf_singleton {a : α} : sInf {a} = a :=
isGLB_singleton.sInf_eq
#align Inf_singleton sInf_singleton
end
/-- A complete lattice is a bounded lattice which has suprema and infima for every subset. -/
class CompleteLattice (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, CompleteSemilatticeSup α,
CompleteSemilatticeInf α, Top α, Bot α where
/-- Any element is less than the top one. -/
protected le_top : ∀ x : α, x ≤ ⊤
/-- Any element is more than the bottom one. -/
protected bot_le : ∀ x : α, ⊥ ≤ x
#align complete_lattice CompleteLattice
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLattice.toBoundedOrder [h : CompleteLattice α] :
BoundedOrder α :=
{ h with }
#align complete_lattice.to_bounded_order CompleteLattice.toBoundedOrder
/-- Create a `CompleteLattice` from a `PartialOrder` and `InfSet`
that returns the greatest lower bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `CompleteLattice`
instance as
```
instance : CompleteLattice my_T where
inf := better_inf
le_inf := ...
inf_le_right := ...
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, sSup, bot, top
__ := completeLatticeOfInf my_T _
```
-/
def completeLatticeOfInf (α : Type*) [H1 : PartialOrder α] [H2 : InfSet α]
(isGLB_sInf : ∀ s : Set α, IsGLB s (sInf s)) : CompleteLattice α where
__ := H1; __ := H2
bot := sInf univ
bot_le x := (isGLB_sInf univ).1 trivial
top := sInf ∅
le_top a := (isGLB_sInf ∅).2 <| by simp
sup a b := sInf { x : α | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
inf a b := sInf {a, b}
le_inf a b c hab hac := by
apply (isGLB_sInf _).2
simp [*]
inf_le_right a b := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| mem_insert_of_mem _ <| mem_singleton _
inf_le_left a b := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| mem_insert _ _
sup_le a b c hac hbc := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| by simp [*]
le_sup_left a b := (isGLB_sInf _).2 fun x => And.left
le_sup_right a b := (isGLB_sInf _).2 fun x => And.right
le_sInf s a ha := (isGLB_sInf s).2 ha
sInf_le s a ha := (isGLB_sInf s).1 ha
sSup s := sInf (upperBounds s)
le_sSup s a ha := (isGLB_sInf (upperBounds s)).2 fun b hb => hb ha
sSup_le s a ha := (isGLB_sInf (upperBounds s)).1 ha
#align complete_lattice_of_Inf completeLatticeOfInf
/-- Any `CompleteSemilatticeInf` is in fact a `CompleteLattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `completeLatticeOfInf`.
-/
def completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (α : Type*) [CompleteSemilatticeInf α] :
CompleteLattice α :=
completeLatticeOfInf α fun s => isGLB_sInf s
#align complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Inf completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf
/-- Create a `CompleteLattice` from a `PartialOrder` and `SupSet`
that returns the least upper bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `CompleteLattice`
instance as
```
instance : CompleteLattice my_T where
inf := better_inf
le_inf := ...
inf_le_right := ...
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, sInf, bot, top
__ := completeLatticeOfSup my_T _
```
-/
def completeLatticeOfSup (α : Type*) [H1 : PartialOrder α] [H2 : SupSet α]
(isLUB_sSup : ∀ s : Set α, IsLUB s (sSup s)) : CompleteLattice α where
__ := H1; __ := H2
top := sSup univ
le_top x := (isLUB_sSup univ).1 trivial
bot := sSup ∅
bot_le x := (isLUB_sSup ∅).2 <| by simp
sup a b := sSup {a, b}
sup_le a b c hac hbc := (isLUB_sSup _).2 (by simp [*])
le_sup_left a b := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| mem_insert _ _
le_sup_right a b := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| mem_insert_of_mem _ <| mem_singleton _
inf a b := sSup { x | x ≤ a ∧ x ≤ b }
le_inf a b c hab hac := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| by simp [*]
inf_le_left a b := (isLUB_sSup _).2 fun x => And.left
inf_le_right a b := (isLUB_sSup _).2 fun x => And.right
sInf s := sSup (lowerBounds s)
sSup_le s a ha := (isLUB_sSup s).2 ha
le_sSup s a ha := (isLUB_sSup s).1 ha
sInf_le s a ha := (isLUB_sSup (lowerBounds s)).2 fun b hb => hb ha
le_sInf s a ha := (isLUB_sSup (lowerBounds s)).1 ha
#align complete_lattice_of_Sup completeLatticeOfSup
/-- Any `CompleteSemilatticeSup` is in fact a `CompleteLattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `completeLatticeOfSup`.
-/
def completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeSup (α : Type*) [CompleteSemilatticeSup α] :
CompleteLattice α :=
completeLatticeOfSup α fun s => isLUB_sSup s
#align complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Sup completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeSup
-- Porting note: as we cannot rename fields while extending,
-- `CompleteLinearOrder` does not directly extend `LinearOrder`.
-- Instead we add the fields by hand, and write a manual instance.
/-- A complete linear order is a linear order whose lattice structure is complete. -/
class CompleteLinearOrder (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α where
/-- A linear order is total. -/
le_total (a b : α) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableLE : DecidableRel (· ≤ · : α → α → Prop)
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableEq : DecidableEq α := @decidableEqOfDecidableLE _ _ decidableLE
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableLT : DecidableRel (· < · : α → α → Prop) :=
@decidableLTOfDecidableLE _ _ decidableLE
#align complete_linear_order CompleteLinearOrder
instance CompleteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder [i : CompleteLinearOrder α] : LinearOrder α where
__ := i
min := Inf.inf
max := Sup.sup
min_def a b := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· simp [(CompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b).resolve_left h]
max_def a b := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· simp [(CompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b).resolve_left h]
namespace OrderDual
instance instCompleteLattice [CompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice αᵒᵈ where
__ := instBoundedOrder α
le_sSup := @CompleteLattice.sInf_le α _
sSup_le := @CompleteLattice.le_sInf α _
sInf_le := @CompleteLattice.le_sSup α _
le_sInf := @CompleteLattice.sSup_le α _
instance instCompleteLinearOrder [CompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ where
__ := instCompleteLattice
__ := instLinearOrder α
end OrderDual
open OrderDual
section
variable [CompleteLattice α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sSup (s : Set α) : toDual (sSup s) = sInf (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_Sup toDual_sSup
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sInf (s : Set α) : toDual (sInf s) = sSup (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_Inf toDual_sInf
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sSup (s : Set αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (sSup s) = sInf (toDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_Sup ofDual_sSup
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sInf (s : Set αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (sInf s) = sSup (toDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_Inf ofDual_sInf
@[simp]
theorem toDual_iSup (f : ι → α) : toDual (⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, toDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_supr toDual_iSup
@[simp]
theorem toDual_iInf (f : ι → α) : toDual (⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, toDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_infi toDual_iInf
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_iSup (f : ι → αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ofDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_supr ofDual_iSup
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_iInf (f : ι → αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, ofDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_infi ofDual_iInf
theorem sInf_le_sSup (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ sSup s :=
isGLB_le_isLUB (isGLB_sInf s) (isLUB_sSup s) hs
#align Inf_le_Sup sInf_le_sSup
theorem sSup_union {s t : Set α} : sSup (s ∪ t) = sSup s ⊔ sSup t :=
((isLUB_sSup s).union (isLUB_sSup t)).sSup_eq
#align Sup_union sSup_union
theorem sInf_union {s t : Set α} : sInf (s ∪ t) = sInf s ⊓ sInf t :=
((isGLB_sInf s).union (isGLB_sInf t)).sInf_eq
#align Inf_union sInf_union
theorem sSup_inter_le {s t : Set α} : sSup (s ∩ t) ≤ sSup s ⊓ sSup t :=
sSup_le fun _ hb => le_inf (le_sSup hb.1) (le_sSup hb.2)
#align Sup_inter_le sSup_inter_le
theorem le_sInf_inter {s t : Set α} : sInf s ⊔ sInf t ≤ sInf (s ∩ t) :=
@sSup_inter_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align le_Inf_inter le_sInf_inter
@[simp]
theorem sSup_empty : sSup ∅ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@isLUB_empty α _ _).sSup_eq
#align Sup_empty sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@isGLB_empty α _ _).sInf_eq
#align Inf_empty sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sSup_univ : sSup univ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@isLUB_univ α _ _).sSup_eq
#align Sup_univ sSup_univ
@[simp]
theorem sInf_univ : sInf univ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@isGLB_univ α _ _).sInf_eq
#align Inf_univ sInf_univ
-- TODO(Jeremy): get this automatically
@[simp]
theorem sSup_insert {a : α} {s : Set α} : sSup (insert a s) = a ⊔ sSup s :=
((isLUB_sSup s).insert a).sSup_eq
#align Sup_insert sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInf_insert {a : α} {s : Set α} : sInf (insert a s) = a ⊓ sInf s :=
((isGLB_sInf s).insert a).sInf_eq
#align Inf_insert sInf_insert
theorem sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot (h : s ⊆ insert ⊥ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
(sSup_le_sSup h).trans_eq (sSup_insert.trans (bot_sup_eq _))
#align Sup_le_Sup_of_subset_insert_bot sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot
theorem sInf_le_sInf_of_subset_insert_top (h : s ⊆ insert ⊤ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
(sInf_le_sInf h).trans_eq' (sInf_insert.trans (top_inf_eq _)).symm
#align Inf_le_Inf_of_subset_insert_top sInf_le_sInf_of_subset_insert_top
@[simp]
theorem sSup_diff_singleton_bot (s : Set α) : sSup (s \ {⊥}) = sSup s :=
(sSup_le_sSup diff_subset).antisymm <|
sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot <| subset_insert_diff_singleton _ _
#align Sup_diff_singleton_bot sSup_diff_singleton_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_diff_singleton_top (s : Set α) : sInf (s \ {⊤}) = sInf s :=
@sSup_diff_singleton_bot αᵒᵈ _ s
#align Inf_diff_singleton_top sInf_diff_singleton_top
theorem sSup_pair {a b : α} : sSup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@isLUB_pair α _ a b).sSup_eq
#align Sup_pair sSup_pair
theorem sInf_pair {a b : α} : sInf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@isGLB_pair α _ a b).sInf_eq
#align Inf_pair sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sSup_eq_bot : sSup s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h _ ha => bot_unique <| h ▸ le_sSup ha, fun h =>
bot_unique <| sSup_le fun a ha => le_bot_iff.2 <| h a ha⟩
#align Sup_eq_bot sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_top : sInf s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a = ⊤ :=
@sSup_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_top sInf_eq_top
theorem eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty {s : Set α} (h_sup : sSup s = ⊥)
(hne : s.Nonempty) : s = {⊥} := by
rw [Set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem]
rw [sSup_eq_bot] at h_sup
exact ⟨hne, h_sup⟩
#align eq_singleton_bot_of_Sup_eq_bot_of_nonempty eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty
theorem eq_singleton_top_of_sInf_eq_top_of_nonempty : sInf s = ⊤ → s.Nonempty → s = {⊤} :=
@eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty αᵒᵈ _ _
#align eq_singleton_top_of_Inf_eq_top_of_nonempty eq_singleton_top_of_sInf_eq_top_of_nonempty
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w < b`.
See `csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (h₁ : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(h₂ : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ a ∈ s, w < a) : sSup s = b :=
(sSup_le h₁).eq_of_not_lt fun h =>
let ⟨_, ha, ha'⟩ := h₂ _ h
((le_sSup ha).trans_lt ha').false
#align Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w > b`.
See `csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
(∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ a ∈ s, a < w) → sInf s = b :=
@sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align Inf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
end
section CompleteLinearOrder
variable [CompleteLinearOrder α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lt_sSup_iff : b < sSup s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b < a :=
lt_isLUB_iff <| isLUB_sSup s
#align lt_Sup_iff lt_sSup_iff
theorem sInf_lt_iff : sInf s < b ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
isGLB_lt_iff <| isGLB_sInf s
#align Inf_lt_iff sInf_lt_iff
theorem sSup_eq_top : sSup s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ b < ⊤, ∃ a ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => lt_sSup_iff.1 <| hb.trans_eq h.symm, fun h =>
top_unique <|
le_of_not_gt fun h' =>
let ⟨_, ha, h⟩ := h _ h'
(h.trans_le <| le_sSup ha).false⟩
#align Sup_eq_top sSup_eq_top
theorem sInf_eq_bot : sInf s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b > ⊥, ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
@sSup_eq_top αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_bot sInf_eq_bot
theorem lt_iSup_iff {f : ι → α} : a < iSup f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i :=
lt_sSup_iff.trans exists_range_iff
#align lt_supr_iff lt_iSup_iff
theorem iInf_lt_iff {f : ι → α} : iInf f < a ↔ ∃ i, f i < a :=
sInf_lt_iff.trans exists_range_iff
#align infi_lt_iff iInf_lt_iff
end CompleteLinearOrder
/-
### iSup & iInf
-/
section SupSet
variable [SupSet α] {f g : ι → α}
theorem sSup_range : sSup (range f) = iSup f :=
rfl
#align Sup_range sSup_range
theorem sSup_eq_iSup' (s : Set α) : sSup s = ⨆ a : s, (a : α) := by rw [iSup, Subtype.range_coe]
#align Sup_eq_supr' sSup_eq_iSup'
theorem iSup_congr (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : ⨆ i, f i = ⨆ i, g i :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align supr_congr iSup_congr
theorem biSup_congr {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∀ i, p i → f i = g i) :
⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), g i :=
iSup_congr fun i ↦ iSup_congr (h i)
theorem biSup_congr' {p : ι → Prop} {f g : (i : ι) → p i → α}
(h : ∀ i (hi : p i), f i hi = g i hi) :
⨆ i, ⨆ (hi : p i), f i hi = ⨆ i, ⨆ (hi : p i), g i hi := by
congr; ext i; congr; ext hi; exact h i hi
theorem Function.Surjective.iSup_comp {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
⨆ x, g (f x) = ⨆ y, g y := by
simp only [iSup.eq_1]
congr
exact hf.range_comp g
#align function.surjective.supr_comp Function.Surjective.iSup_comp
theorem Equiv.iSup_comp {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') : ⨆ x, g (e x) = ⨆ y, g y :=
e.surjective.iSup_comp _
#align equiv.supr_comp Equiv.iSup_comp
protected theorem Function.Surjective.iSup_congr {g : ι' → α} (h : ι → ι') (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⨆ x, f x = ⨆ y, g y := by
convert h1.iSup_comp g
exact (h2 _).symm
#align function.surjective.supr_congr Function.Surjective.iSup_congr
protected theorem Equiv.iSup_congr {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (h : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
⨆ x, f x = ⨆ y, g y :=
e.surjective.iSup_congr _ h
#align equiv.supr_congr Equiv.iSup_congr
@[congr]
theorem iSup_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iSup f₁ = iSup f₂ := by
obtain rfl := propext pq
congr with x
apply f
#align supr_congr_Prop iSup_congr_Prop
theorem iSup_plift_up (f : PLift ι → α) : ⨆ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
(PLift.up_surjective.iSup_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align supr_plift_up iSup_plift_up
theorem iSup_plift_down (f : ι → α) : ⨆ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
(PLift.down_surjective.iSup_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align supr_plift_down iSup_plift_down
theorem iSup_range' (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) : ⨆ b : range f, g b = ⨆ i, g (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, ← image_eq_range, ← range_comp]
rfl
#align supr_range' iSup_range'
theorem sSup_image' {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sSup (f '' s) = ⨆ a : s, f a := by
rw [iSup, image_eq_range]
#align Sup_image' sSup_image'
end SupSet
section InfSet
variable [InfSet α] {f g : ι → α}
theorem sInf_range : sInf (range f) = iInf f :=
rfl
#align Inf_range sInf_range
theorem sInf_eq_iInf' (s : Set α) : sInf s = ⨅ a : s, (a : α) :=
@sSup_eq_iSup' αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_infi' sInf_eq_iInf'
theorem iInf_congr (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : ⨅ i, f i = ⨅ i, g i :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align infi_congr iInf_congr
theorem biInf_congr {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∀ i, p i → f i = g i) :
⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), g i :=
biSup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem biInf_congr' {p : ι → Prop} {f g : (i : ι) → p i → α}
(h : ∀ i (hi : p i), f i hi = g i hi) :
⨅ i, ⨅ (hi : p i), f i hi = ⨅ i, ⨅ (hi : p i), g i hi := by
congr; ext i; congr; ext hi; exact h i hi
theorem Function.Surjective.iInf_comp {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
⨅ x, g (f x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Function.Surjective.iSup_comp αᵒᵈ _ _ _ f hf g
#align function.surjective.infi_comp Function.Surjective.iInf_comp
theorem Equiv.iInf_comp {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') : ⨅ x, g (e x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Equiv.iSup_comp αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ e
#align equiv.infi_comp Equiv.iInf_comp
protected theorem Function.Surjective.iInf_congr {g : ι' → α} (h : ι → ι') (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⨅ x, f x = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Function.Surjective.iSup_congr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h h1 h2
#align function.surjective.infi_congr Function.Surjective.iInf_congr
protected theorem Equiv.iInf_congr {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (h : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
⨅ x, f x = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Equiv.iSup_congr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ e h
#align equiv.infi_congr Equiv.iInf_congr
@[congr]
theorem iInf_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInf f₁ = iInf f₂ :=
@iSup_congr_Prop αᵒᵈ _ p q f₁ f₂ pq f
#align infi_congr_Prop iInf_congr_Prop
theorem iInf_plift_up (f : PLift ι → α) : ⨅ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⨅ i, f i :=
(PLift.up_surjective.iInf_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align infi_plift_up iInf_plift_up
theorem iInf_plift_down (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⨅ i, f i :=
(PLift.down_surjective.iInf_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align infi_plift_down iInf_plift_down
theorem iInf_range' (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) : ⨅ b : range f, g b = ⨅ i, g (f i) :=
@iSup_range' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align infi_range' iInf_range'
theorem sInf_image' {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sInf (f '' s) = ⨅ a : s, f a :=
@sSup_image' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align Inf_image' sInf_image'
end InfSet
section
variable [CompleteLattice α] {f g s t : ι → α} {a b : α}
theorem le_iSup (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : f i ≤ iSup f :=
le_sSup ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align le_supr le_iSup
theorem iInf_le (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : iInf f ≤ f i :=
sInf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align infi_le iInf_le
theorem le_iSup' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : f i ≤ iSup f :=
le_sSup ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align le_supr' le_iSup'
theorem iInf_le' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : iInf f ≤ f i :=
sInf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align infi_le' iInf_le'
theorem isLUB_iSup : IsLUB (range f) (⨆ j, f j) :=
isLUB_sSup _
#align is_lub_supr isLUB_iSup
theorem isGLB_iInf : IsGLB (range f) (⨅ j, f j) :=
isGLB_sInf _
#align is_glb_infi isGLB_iInf
theorem IsLUB.iSup_eq (h : IsLUB (range f) a) : ⨆ j, f j = a :=
h.sSup_eq
#align is_lub.supr_eq IsLUB.iSup_eq
theorem IsGLB.iInf_eq (h : IsGLB (range f) a) : ⨅ j, f j = a :=
h.sInf_eq
#align is_glb.infi_eq IsGLB.iInf_eq
theorem le_iSup_of_le (i : ι) (h : a ≤ f i) : a ≤ iSup f :=
h.trans <| le_iSup _ i
#align le_supr_of_le le_iSup_of_le
theorem iInf_le_of_le (i : ι) (h : f i ≤ a) : iInf f ≤ a :=
(iInf_le _ i).trans h
#align infi_le_of_le iInf_le_of_le
theorem le_iSup₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j :=
le_iSup_of_le i <| le_iSup (f i) j
#align le_supr₂ le_iSup₂
theorem iInf₂_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ f i j :=
iInf_le_of_le i <| iInf_le (f i) j
#align infi₂_le iInf₂_le
theorem le_iSup₂_of_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) (h : a ≤ f i j) :
a ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j :=
h.trans <| le_iSup₂ i j
#align le_supr₂_of_le le_iSup₂_of_le
theorem iInf₂_le_of_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) (h : f i j ≤ a) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a :=
(iInf₂_le i j).trans h
#align infi₂_le_of_le iInf₂_le_of_le
theorem iSup_le (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) : iSup f ≤ a :=
sSup_le fun _ ⟨i, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ h i
#align supr_le iSup_le
theorem le_iInf (h : ∀ i, a ≤ f i) : a ≤ iInf f :=
le_sInf fun _ ⟨i, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ h i
#align le_infi le_iInf
theorem iSup₂_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ a) : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a :=
iSup_le fun i => iSup_le <| h i
#align supr₂_le iSup₂_le
theorem le_iInf₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i j) : a ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j :=
le_iInf fun i => le_iInf <| h i
#align le_infi₂ le_iInf₂
theorem iSup₂_le_iSup (κ : ι → Sort*) (f : ι → α) : ⨆ (i) (_ : κ i), f i ≤ ⨆ i, f i :=
iSup₂_le fun i _ => le_iSup f i
#align supr₂_le_supr iSup₂_le_iSup
theorem iInf_le_iInf₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i, f i ≤ ⨅ (i) (_ : κ i), f i :=
le_iInf₂ fun i _ => iInf_le f i
#align infi_le_infi₂ iInf_le_iInf₂
@[gcongr]
theorem iSup_mono (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : iSup f ≤ iSup g :=
iSup_le fun i => le_iSup_of_le i <| h i
#align supr_mono iSup_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInf_mono (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : iInf f ≤ iInf g :=
le_iInf fun i => iInf_le_of_le i <| h i
#align infi_mono iInf_mono
theorem iSup₂_mono {f g : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ g i j) :
⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), g i j :=
iSup_mono fun i => iSup_mono <| h i
#align supr₂_mono iSup₂_mono
theorem iInf₂_mono {f g : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ g i j) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), g i j :=
iInf_mono fun i => iInf_mono <| h i
#align infi₂_mono iInf₂_mono
theorem iSup_mono' {g : ι' → α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ i', f i ≤ g i') : iSup f ≤ iSup g :=
iSup_le fun i => Exists.elim (h i) le_iSup_of_le
#align supr_mono' iSup_mono'
theorem iInf_mono' {g : ι' → α} (h : ∀ i', ∃ i, f i ≤ g i') : iInf f ≤ iInf g :=
le_iInf fun i' => Exists.elim (h i') iInf_le_of_le
#align infi_mono' iInf_mono'
theorem iSup₂_mono' {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} {g : ∀ i', κ' i' → α} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', f i j ≤ g i' j') :
⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), g i j :=
iSup₂_le fun i j =>
let ⟨i', j', h⟩ := h i j
le_iSup₂_of_le i' j' h
#align supr₂_mono' iSup₂_mono'
theorem iInf₂_mono' {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} {g : ∀ i', κ' i' → α} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', f i' j' ≤ g i j) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), g i j :=
le_iInf₂ fun i j =>
let ⟨i', j', h⟩ := h i j
iInf₂_le_of_le i' j' h
#align infi₂_mono' iInf₂_mono'
theorem iSup_const_mono (h : ι → ι') : ⨆ _ : ι, a ≤ ⨆ _ : ι', a :=
iSup_le <| le_iSup _ ∘ h
#align supr_const_mono iSup_const_mono
theorem iInf_const_mono (h : ι' → ι) : ⨅ _ : ι, a ≤ ⨅ _ : ι', a :=
le_iInf <| iInf_le _ ∘ h
#align infi_const_mono iInf_const_mono
theorem iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (f : ι → ι' → α) : ⨆ i, ⨅ j, f i j ≤ ⨅ j, ⨆ i, f i j :=
iSup_le fun i => iInf_mono fun j => le_iSup (fun i => f i j) i
#align supr_infi_le_infi_supr iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup
theorem biSup_mono {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) :
⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i ≤ ⨆ (i) (_ : q i), f i :=
iSup_mono fun i => iSup_const_mono (hpq i)
#align bsupr_mono biSup_mono
theorem biInf_mono {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) :
⨅ (i) (_ : q i), f i ≤ ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i :=
iInf_mono fun i => iInf_const_mono (hpq i)
#align binfi_mono biInf_mono
@[simp]
theorem iSup_le_iff : iSup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff isLUB_iSup).trans forall_mem_range
#align supr_le_iff iSup_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem le_iInf_iff : a ≤ iInf f ↔ ∀ i, a ≤ f i :=
(le_isGLB_iff isGLB_iInf).trans forall_mem_range
#align le_infi_iff le_iInf_iff
theorem iSup₂_le_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a ↔ ∀ i j, f i j ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_le_iff]
#align supr₂_le_iff iSup₂_le_iff
theorem le_iInf₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : (a ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, a ≤ f i j := by
simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
#align le_infi₂_iff le_iInf₂_iff
theorem iSup_lt_iff : iSup f < a ↔ ∃ b, b < a ∧ ∀ i, f i ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨iSup f, h, le_iSup f⟩, fun ⟨_, h, hb⟩ => (iSup_le hb).trans_lt h⟩
#align supr_lt_iff iSup_lt_iff
theorem lt_iInf_iff : a < iInf f ↔ ∃ b, a < b ∧ ∀ i, b ≤ f i :=
⟨fun h => ⟨iInf f, h, iInf_le f⟩, fun ⟨_, h, hb⟩ => h.trans_le <| le_iInf hb⟩
#align lt_infi_iff lt_iInf_iff
theorem sSup_eq_iSup {s : Set α} : sSup s = ⨆ a ∈ s, a :=
le_antisymm (sSup_le le_iSup₂) (iSup₂_le fun _ => le_sSup)
#align Sup_eq_supr sSup_eq_iSup
theorem sInf_eq_iInf {s : Set α} : sInf s = ⨅ a ∈ s, a :=
@sSup_eq_iSup αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_infi sInf_eq_iInf
theorem Monotone.le_map_iSup [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
⨆ i, f (s i) ≤ f (iSup s) :=
iSup_le fun _ => hf <| le_iSup _ _
#align monotone.le_map_supr Monotone.le_map_iSup
theorem Antitone.le_map_iInf [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
⨆ i, f (s i) ≤ f (iInf s) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_iSup
#align antitone.le_map_infi Antitone.le_map_iInf
theorem Monotone.le_map_iSup₂ [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
⨆ (i) (j), f (s i j) ≤ f (⨆ (i) (j), s i j) :=
iSup₂_le fun _ _ => hf <| le_iSup₂ _ _
#align monotone.le_map_supr₂ Monotone.le_map_iSup₂
theorem Antitone.le_map_iInf₂ [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
⨆ (i) (j), f (s i j) ≤ f (⨅ (i) (j), s i j) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align antitone.le_map_infi₂ Antitone.le_map_iInf₂
theorem Monotone.le_map_sSup [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
⨆ a ∈ s, f a ≤ f (sSup s) := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup]; exact hf.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align monotone.le_map_Sup Monotone.le_map_sSup
theorem Antitone.le_map_sInf [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
⨆ a ∈ s, f a ≤ f (sInf s) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_sSup
#align antitone.le_map_Inf Antitone.le_map_sInf
theorem OrderIso.map_iSup [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨆ i, x i) = ⨆ i, f (x i) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff <| f.surjective.forall.2
fun x => by simp only [f.le_iff_le, iSup_le_iff]
#align order_iso.map_supr OrderIso.map_iSup
theorem OrderIso.map_iInf [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨅ i, x i) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
OrderIso.map_iSup f.dual _
#align order_iso.map_infi OrderIso.map_iInf
theorem OrderIso.map_sSup [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sSup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, OrderIso.map_iSup]
#align order_iso.map_Sup OrderIso.map_sSup
theorem OrderIso.map_sInf [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sInf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
OrderIso.map_sSup f.dual _
#align order_iso.map_Inf OrderIso.map_sInf
theorem iSup_comp_le {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') : ⨆ x, f (g x) ≤ ⨆ y, f y :=
iSup_mono' fun _ => ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
#align supr_comp_le iSup_comp_le
theorem le_iInf_comp {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') : ⨅ y, f y ≤ ⨅ x, f (g x) :=
iInf_mono' fun _ => ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
#align le_infi_comp le_iInf_comp
theorem Monotone.iSup_comp_eq [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {s : ι → β}
(hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ≤ s i) : ⨆ x, f (s x) = ⨆ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (iSup_comp_le _ _) (iSup_mono' fun x => (hs x).imp fun _ hi => hf hi)
#align monotone.supr_comp_eq Monotone.iSup_comp_eq
theorem Monotone.iInf_comp_eq [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {s : ι → β}
(hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, s i ≤ x) : ⨅ x, f (s x) = ⨅ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (iInf_mono' fun x => (hs x).imp fun _ hi => hf hi) (le_iInf_comp _ _)
#align monotone.infi_comp_eq Monotone.iInf_comp_eq
theorem Antitone.map_iSup_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
f (iSup s) ≤ ⨅ i, f (s i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => hf <| le_iSup _ _
#align antitone.map_supr_le Antitone.map_iSup_le
theorem Monotone.map_iInf_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
f (iInf s) ≤ ⨅ i, f (s i) :=
hf.dual_left.map_iSup_le
#align monotone.map_infi_le Monotone.map_iInf_le
theorem Antitone.map_iSup₂_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
f (⨆ (i) (j), s i j) ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f (s i j) :=
hf.dual.le_map_iInf₂ _
#align antitone.map_supr₂_le Antitone.map_iSup₂_le
theorem Monotone.map_iInf₂_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
f (⨅ (i) (j), s i j) ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f (s i j) :=
hf.dual.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align monotone.map_infi₂_le Monotone.map_iInf₂_le
theorem Antitone.map_sSup_le [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
f (sSup s) ≤ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup]
exact hf.map_iSup₂_le _
#align antitone.map_Sup_le Antitone.map_sSup_le
theorem Monotone.map_sInf_le [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
f (sInf s) ≤ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
hf.dual_left.map_sSup_le
#align monotone.map_Inf_le Monotone.map_sInf_le
theorem iSup_const_le : ⨆ _ : ι, a ≤ a :=
iSup_le fun _ => le_rfl
#align supr_const_le iSup_const_le
theorem le_iInf_const : a ≤ ⨅ _ : ι, a :=
le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
#align le_infi_const le_iInf_const
-- We generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `ciSup_const` and `ciInf_const`.
theorem iSup_const [Nonempty ι] : ⨆ _ : ι, a = a := by rw [iSup, range_const, sSup_singleton]
#align supr_const iSup_const
theorem iInf_const [Nonempty ι] : ⨅ _ : ι, a = a :=
@iSup_const αᵒᵈ _ _ a _
#align infi_const iInf_const
@[simp]
theorem iSup_bot : (⨆ _ : ι, ⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique iSup_const_le
#align supr_bot iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInf_top : (⨅ _ : ι, ⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique le_iInf_const
#align infi_top iInf_top
@[simp]
theorem iSup_eq_bot : iSup s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ⊥ :=
sSup_eq_bot.trans forall_mem_range
#align supr_eq_bot iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInf_eq_top : iInf s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ⊤ :=
sInf_eq_top.trans forall_mem_range
#align infi_eq_top iInf_eq_top
theorem iSup₂_eq_bot {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i j, f i j = ⊥ := by
simp
#align supr₂_eq_bot iSup₂_eq_bot
theorem iInf₂_eq_top {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j = ⊤ ↔ ∀ i j, f i j = ⊤ := by
simp
#align infi₂_eq_top iInf₂_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem iSup_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : ⨆ h : p, f h = f hp :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun _ => le_rfl) (le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_pos iSup_pos
@[simp]
theorem iInf_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : ⨅ h : p, f h = f hp :=
le_antisymm (iInf_le _ _) (le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl)
#align infi_pos iInf_pos
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬p) : ⨆ h : p, f h = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun h => (hp h).elim) bot_le
#align supr_neg iSup_neg
@[simp]
theorem iInf_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬p) : ⨅ h : p, f h = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top <| le_iInf fun h => (hp h).elim
#align infi_neg iInf_neg
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `ciSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt {f : ι → α} (h₁ : ∀ i, f i ≤ b)
(h₂ : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ i, w < f i) : ⨆ i : ι, f i = b :=
sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (forall_mem_range.mpr h₁) fun w hw =>
exists_range_iff.mpr <| h₂ w hw
#align supr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
(∀ i, b ≤ f i) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ i, f i < w) → ⨅ i, f i = b :=
@iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
theorem iSup_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : p → α) :
⨆ h : p, a h = if h : p then a h else ⊥ := by by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
#align supr_eq_dif iSup_eq_dif
theorem iSup_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : α) : ⨆ _ : p, a = if p then a else ⊥ :=
iSup_eq_dif fun _ => a
#align supr_eq_if iSup_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : p → α) :
⨅ h : p, a h = if h : p then a h else ⊤ :=
@iSup_eq_dif αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_eq_dif iInf_eq_dif
theorem iInf_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : α) : ⨅ _ : p, a = if p then a else ⊤ :=
iInf_eq_dif fun _ => a
#align infi_eq_if iInf_eq_if
theorem iSup_comm {f : ι → ι' → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j = ⨆ (j) (i), f i j :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun i => iSup_mono fun j => le_iSup (fun i => f i j) i)
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_mono fun _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_comm iSup_comm
theorem iInf_comm {f : ι → ι' → α} : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j = ⨅ (j) (i), f i j :=
@iSup_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_comm iInf_comm
theorem iSup₂_comm {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
(f : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → α) :
⨆ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⨆ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@iSup_comm _ (κ₁ _), @iSup_comm _ ι₁]
#align supr₂_comm iSup₂_comm
theorem iInf₂_comm {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
(f : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → α) :
⨅ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⨅ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@iInf_comm _ (κ₁ _), @iInf_comm _ ι₁]
#align infi₂_comm iInf₂_comm
/- TODO: this is strange. In the proof below, we get exactly the desired
among the equalities, but close does not get it.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
simp, intros,
begin [smt]
ematch, ematch, ematch, trace_state, have := le_refl (f i_1 i),
trace_state, close
end
end
-/
@[simp]
theorem iSup_iSup_eq_left {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, x = b → α} : ⨆ x, ⨆ h : x = b, f x h = f b rfl :=
(@le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ f b rfl).antisymm'
(iSup_le fun c =>
iSup_le <| by
rintro rfl
rfl)
#align supr_supr_eq_left iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInf_iInf_eq_left {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, x = b → α} : ⨅ x, ⨅ h : x = b, f x h = f b rfl :=
@iSup_iSup_eq_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_infi_eq_left iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iSup_iSup_eq_right {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, b = x → α} : ⨆ x, ⨆ h : b = x, f x h = f b rfl :=
(le_iSup₂ b rfl).antisymm'
(iSup₂_le fun c => by
rintro rfl
rfl)
#align supr_supr_eq_right iSup_iSup_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iInf_iInf_eq_right {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, b = x → α} : ⨅ x, ⨅ h : b = x, f x h = f b rfl :=
@iSup_iSup_eq_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_infi_eq_right iInf_iInf_eq_right
theorem iSup_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : Subtype p → α} : iSup f = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ p _ (fun i h => f ⟨i, h⟩) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_subtype iSup_subtype
theorem iInf_subtype : ∀ {p : ι → Prop} {f : Subtype p → α}, iInf f = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
@iSup_subtype αᵒᵈ _ _
#align infi_subtype iInf_subtype
theorem iSup_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
⨆ (i) (h), f i h = ⨆ x : Subtype p, f x x.property :=
(@iSup_subtype _ _ _ p fun x => f x.val x.property).symm
#align supr_subtype' iSup_subtype'
theorem iInf_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h = ⨅ x : Subtype p, f x x.property :=
(@iInf_subtype _ _ _ p fun x => f x.val x.property).symm
#align infi_subtype' iInf_subtype'
theorem iSup_subtype'' {ι} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → α) : ⨆ i : s, f i = ⨆ (t : ι) (_ : t ∈ s), f t :=
iSup_subtype
#align supr_subtype'' iSup_subtype''
theorem iInf_subtype'' {ι} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i : s, f i = ⨅ (t : ι) (_ : t ∈ s), f t :=
iInf_subtype
#align infi_subtype'' iInf_subtype''
theorem biSup_const {ι : Sort _} {a : α} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ⨆ i ∈ s, a = a := by
haveI : Nonempty s := Set.nonempty_coe_sort.mpr hs
rw [← iSup_subtype'', iSup_const]
#align bsupr_const biSup_const
theorem biInf_const {ι : Sort _} {a : α} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ⨅ i ∈ s, a = a :=
@biSup_const αᵒᵈ _ ι _ s hs
#align binfi_const biInf_const
theorem iSup_sup_eq : ⨆ x, f x ⊔ g x = (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ ⨆ x, g x :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun _ => sup_le_sup (le_iSup _ _) <| le_iSup _ _)
(sup_le (iSup_mono fun _ => le_sup_left) <| iSup_mono fun _ => le_sup_right)
#align supr_sup_eq iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInf_inf_eq : ⨅ x, f x ⊓ g x = (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ ⨅ x, g x :=
@iSup_sup_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_inf_eq iInf_inf_eq
lemma Equiv.biSup_comp {ι ι' : Type*} {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (s : Set ι') :
⨆ i ∈ e.symm '' s, g (e i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, g i := by
simpa only [iSup_subtype'] using (image e.symm s).symm.iSup_comp (g := g ∘ (↑))
lemma Equiv.biInf_comp {ι ι' : Type*} {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (s : Set ι') :
⨅ i ∈ e.symm '' s, g (e i) = ⨅ i ∈ s, g i :=
e.biSup_comp s (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma biInf_le {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
⨅ i ∈ s, f i ≤ f i := by
simpa only [iInf_subtype'] using iInf_le (ι := s) (f := f ∘ (↑)) ⟨i, hi⟩
lemma le_biSup {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
f i ≤ ⨆ i ∈ s, f i :=
biInf_le (α := αᵒᵈ) f hi
/- TODO: here is another example where more flexible pattern matching
might help.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
safe, pose h := f a ⊓ g a, begin [smt] ematch, ematch end
end
-/
theorem iSup_sup [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ a = ⨆ x, f x ⊔ a := by
rw [iSup_sup_eq, iSup_const]
#align supr_sup iSup_sup
theorem iInf_inf [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ a = ⨅ x, f x ⊓ a := by
rw [iInf_inf_eq, iInf_const]
#align infi_inf iInf_inf
theorem sup_iSup [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (a ⊔ ⨆ x, f x) = ⨆ x, a ⊔ f x := by
rw [iSup_sup_eq, iSup_const]
#align sup_supr sup_iSup
theorem inf_iInf [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (a ⊓ ⨅ x, f x) = ⨅ x, a ⊓ f x := by
rw [iInf_inf_eq, iInf_const]
#align inf_infi inf_iInf
theorem biSup_sup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊔ a = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h ⊔ a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h
⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩
rw [iSup_subtype', iSup_subtype', iSup_sup]
#align bsupr_sup biSup_sup
theorem sup_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(a ⊔ ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), a ⊔ f i h := by
simpa only [sup_comm] using @biSup_sup α _ _ p _ _ h
#align sup_bsupr sup_biSup
theorem biInf_inf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ a = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h ⊓ a :=
@biSup_sup αᵒᵈ ι _ p f _ h
#align binfi_inf biInf_inf
theorem inf_biInf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(a ⊓ ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), a ⊓ f i h :=
@sup_biSup αᵒᵈ ι _ p f _ h
#align inf_binfi inf_biInf
/-! ### `iSup` and `iInf` under `Prop` -/
theorem iSup_false {s : False → α} : iSup s = ⊥ := by simp
#align supr_false iSup_false
theorem iInf_false {s : False → α} : iInf s = ⊤ := by simp
#align infi_false iInf_false
theorem iSup_true {s : True → α} : iSup s = s trivial :=
iSup_pos trivial
#align supr_true iSup_true
theorem iInf_true {s : True → α} : iInf s = s trivial :=
iInf_pos trivial
#align infi_true iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iSup_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : ⨆ x, f x = ⨆ (i) (h), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => _) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_exists iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iInf_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : ⨅ x, f x = ⨅ (i) (h), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
@iSup_exists αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_exists iInf_exists
theorem iSup_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : iSup s = ⨆ (h₁) (h₂), s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => _) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_and iSup_and
theorem iInf_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : iInf s = ⨅ (h₁) (h₂), s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
@iSup_and αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_and iInf_and
/-- The symmetric case of `iSup_and`, useful for rewriting into a supremum over a conjunction -/
theorem iSup_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
⨆ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂ = ⨆ h : p ∧ q, s h.1 h.2 :=
Eq.symm iSup_and
#align supr_and' iSup_and'
/-- The symmetric case of `iInf_and`, useful for rewriting into an infimum over a conjunction -/
theorem iInf_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
⨅ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂ = ⨅ h : p ∧ q, s h.1 h.2 :=
Eq.symm iInf_and
#align infi_and' iInf_and'
theorem iSup_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
⨆ x, s x = (⨆ i, s (Or.inl i)) ⊔ ⨆ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
le_antisymm
(iSup_le fun i =>
match i with
| Or.inl _ => le_sup_of_le_left <| le_iSup (fun _ => s _) _
| Or.inr _ => le_sup_of_le_right <| le_iSup (fun _ => s _) _)
(sup_le (iSup_comp_le _ _) (iSup_comp_le _ _))
#align supr_or iSup_or
theorem iInf_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
⨅ x, s x = (⨅ i, s (Or.inl i)) ⊓ ⨅ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
@iSup_or αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_or iInf_or
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iSup_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → α) :
⨆ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊔ ⨆ (i) (h : ¬p i),
g i h := by
rw [← iSup_sup_eq]
congr 1 with i
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align supr_dite iSup_dite
theorem iInf_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → α) :
⨅ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ ⨅ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite p (show ∀ i, p i → αᵒᵈ from f) g
#align infi_dite iInf_dite
theorem iSup_ite (f g : ι → α) :
⨆ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊔ ⨆ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align supr_ite iSup_ite
theorem iInf_ite (f g : ι → α) :
⨅ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊓ ⨅ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align infi_ite iInf_ite
end
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteLattice.lean | 1,340 | 1,341 | theorem iSup_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : ⨆ b ∈ range f, g b = ⨆ i, g (f i) := by |
rw [← iSup_subtype'', iSup_range']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Alexey Soloyev, Junyan Xu, Kamila Szewczyk
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Algebra.LinearRecurrence
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.NatFib
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Prime
#align_import data.real.golden_ratio from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# The golden ratio and its conjugate
This file defines the golden ratio `φ := (1 + √5)/2` and its conjugate
`ψ := (1 - √5)/2`, which are the two real roots of `X² - X - 1`.
Along with various computational facts about them, we prove their
irrationality, and we link them to the Fibonacci sequence by proving
Binet's formula.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
/-- The golden ratio `φ := (1 + √5)/2`. -/
abbrev goldenRatio : ℝ := (1 + √5) / 2
#align golden_ratio goldenRatio
/-- The conjugate of the golden ratio `ψ := (1 - √5)/2`. -/
abbrev goldenConj : ℝ := (1 - √5) / 2
#align golden_conj goldenConj
@[inherit_doc goldenRatio] scoped[goldenRatio] notation "φ" => goldenRatio
@[inherit_doc goldenConj] scoped[goldenRatio] notation "ψ" => goldenConj
open Real goldenRatio
/-- The inverse of the golden ratio is the opposite of its conjugate. -/
theorem inv_gold : φ⁻¹ = -ψ := by
have : 1 + √5 ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (add_pos (by norm_num) <| Real.sqrt_pos.mpr (by norm_num))
field_simp [sub_mul, mul_add]
norm_num
#align inv_gold inv_gold
/-- The opposite of the golden ratio is the inverse of its conjugate. -/
theorem inv_goldConj : ψ⁻¹ = -φ := by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, ← neg_inv, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
exact inv_gold.symm
#align inv_gold_conj inv_goldConj
@[simp]
theorem gold_mul_goldConj : φ * ψ = -1 := by
field_simp
rw [← sq_sub_sq]
norm_num
#align gold_mul_gold_conj gold_mul_goldConj
@[simp]
theorem goldConj_mul_gold : ψ * φ = -1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact gold_mul_goldConj
#align gold_conj_mul_gold goldConj_mul_gold
@[simp]
theorem gold_add_goldConj : φ + ψ = 1 := by
rw [goldenRatio, goldenConj]
ring
#align gold_add_gold_conj gold_add_goldConj
| Mathlib/Data/Real/GoldenRatio.lean | 75 | 76 | theorem one_sub_goldConj : 1 - φ = ψ := by |
linarith [gold_add_goldConj]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Polynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Arg
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.cyclotomic.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5bfbcca0a7ffdd21cf1682e59106d6c942434a32"
/-!
# Evaluating cyclotomic polynomials
This file states some results about evaluating cyclotomic polynomials in various different ways.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.eval(₂)_one_cyclotomic_prime(_pow)`: `eval 1 (cyclotomic p^k R) = p`.
* `Polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_not_prime_pow`: Otherwise, `eval 1 (cyclotomic n R) = 1`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_pos` : `∀ x, 0 < eval x (cyclotomic n R)` if `2 < n`.
-/
namespace Polynomial
open Finset Nat
@[simp]
theorem eval_one_cyclotomic_prime {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} [hn : Fact p.Prime] :
eval 1 (cyclotomic p R) = p := by
simp only [cyclotomic_prime, eval_X, one_pow, Finset.sum_const, eval_pow, eval_finset_sum,
Finset.card_range, smul_one_eq_cast]
#align polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_prime Polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_prime
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp already proves this
theorem eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) {p : ℕ}
[Fact p.Prime] : eval₂ f 1 (cyclotomic p R) = p := by simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime Polynomial.eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime
@[simp]
theorem eval_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} (k : ℕ)
[hn : Fact p.Prime] : eval 1 (cyclotomic (p ^ (k + 1)) R) = p := by
simp only [cyclotomic_prime_pow_eq_geom_sum hn.out, eval_X, one_pow, Finset.sum_const, eval_pow,
eval_finset_sum, Finset.card_range, smul_one_eq_cast]
#align polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow Polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp already proves this
theorem eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
{p : ℕ} (k : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] : eval₂ f 1 (cyclotomic (p ^ (k + 1)) R) = p := by simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow Polynomial.eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow
private theorem cyclotomic_neg_one_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) {R} [LinearOrderedCommRing R] :
0 < eval (-1 : R) (cyclotomic n R) := by
haveI := NeZero.of_gt hn
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg, eval_intCast_map, Int.coe_castRingHom,
Int.cast_pos]
suffices 0 < eval (↑(-1 : ℤ)) (cyclotomic n ℝ) by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int n ℝ, eval_intCast_map, Int.coe_castRingHom] at this
simpa only [Int.cast_pos] using this
simp only [Int.cast_one, Int.cast_neg]
have h0 := cyclotomic_coeff_zero ℝ hn.le
rw [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero] at h0
by_contra! hx
have := intermediate_value_univ (-1) 0 (cyclotomic n ℝ).continuous
obtain ⟨y, hy : IsRoot _ y⟩ := this (show (0 : ℝ) ∈ Set.Icc _ _ by simpa [h0] using hx)
rw [@isRoot_cyclotomic_iff] at hy
rw [hy.eq_orderOf] at hn
exact hn.not_le LinearOrderedRing.orderOf_le_two
theorem cyclotomic_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) {R} [LinearOrderedCommRing R] (x : R) :
0 < eval x (cyclotomic n R) := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n ih
have hn' : 0 < n := pos_of_gt hn
have hn'' : 1 < n := one_lt_two.trans hn
have := prod_cyclotomic_eq_geom_sum hn' R
apply_fun eval x at this
rw [← cons_self_properDivisors hn'.ne', Finset.erase_cons_of_ne _ hn''.ne', Finset.prod_cons,
eval_mul, eval_geom_sum] at this
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i) with (h | h | h)
· apply pos_of_mul_pos_left
· rwa [this]
rw [eval_prod]
refine Finset.prod_nonneg fun i hi => ?_
simp only [Finset.mem_erase, mem_properDivisors] at hi
rw [geom_sum_pos_iff hn'.ne'] at h
cases' h with hk hx
· refine (ih _ hi.2.2 (Nat.two_lt_of_ne ?_ hi.1 ?_)).le <;> rintro rfl
· exact hn'.ne' (zero_dvd_iff.mp hi.2.1)
· exact even_iff_not_odd.mp (even_iff_two_dvd.mpr hi.2.1) hk
· rcases eq_or_ne i 2 with (rfl | hk)
· simpa only [eval_X, eval_one, cyclotomic_two, eval_add] using hx.le
refine (ih _ hi.2.2 (Nat.two_lt_of_ne ?_ hi.1 hk)).le
rintro rfl
exact hn'.ne' <| zero_dvd_iff.mp hi.2.1
· rw [eq_comm, geom_sum_eq_zero_iff_neg_one hn'.ne'] at h
exact h.1.symm ▸ cyclotomic_neg_one_pos hn
· apply pos_of_mul_neg_left
· rwa [this]
rw [geom_sum_neg_iff hn'.ne'] at h
have h2 : 2 ∈ n.properDivisors.erase 1 := by
rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_properDivisors]
exact ⟨by decide, even_iff_two_dvd.mp h.1, hn⟩
rw [eval_prod, ← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ h2]
apply mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos
· refine Finset.prod_nonneg fun i hi => le_of_lt ?_
simp only [Finset.mem_erase, mem_properDivisors] at hi
refine ih _ hi.2.2.2 (Nat.two_lt_of_ne ?_ hi.2.1 hi.1)
rintro rfl
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hi
exact hn'.ne' hi.2.2.1
· simpa only [eval_X, eval_one, cyclotomic_two, eval_add] using h.right.le
#align polynomial.cyclotomic_pos Polynomial.cyclotomic_pos
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Eval.lean | 114 | 122 | theorem cyclotomic_pos_and_nonneg (n : ℕ) {R} [LinearOrderedCommRing R] (x : R) :
(1 < x → 0 < eval x (cyclotomic n R)) ∧ (1 ≤ x → 0 ≤ eval x (cyclotomic n R)) := by |
rcases n with (_ | _ | _ | n)
· simp only [cyclotomic_zero, eval_one, zero_lt_one, implies_true, zero_le_one, and_self]
· simp only [zero_add, cyclotomic_one, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_one, sub_pos, imp_self, sub_nonneg,
and_self]
· simp only [zero_add, reduceAdd, cyclotomic_two, eval_add, eval_X, eval_one]
constructor <;> intro <;> linarith
· constructor <;> intro <;> [skip; apply le_of_lt] <;> apply cyclotomic_pos (by omega)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Minchao Wu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Minchao Wu, Chris Hughes, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
#align_import data.list.min_max from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6d0adfa76594f304b4650d098273d4366edeb61b"
/-!
# Minimum and maximum of lists
## Main definitions
The main definitions are `argmax`, `argmin`, `minimum` and `maximum` for lists.
`argmax f l` returns `some a`, where `a` of `l` that maximises `f a`. If there are `a b` such that
`f a = f b`, it returns whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list.
`argmax f [] = none`
`minimum l` returns a `WithTop α`, the smallest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊤` for
`[]`
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
section ArgAux
variable (r : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel r] {l : List α} {o : Option α} {a m : α}
/-- Auxiliary definition for `argmax` and `argmin`. -/
def argAux (a : Option α) (b : α) : Option α :=
Option.casesOn a (some b) fun c => if r b c then some b else some c
#align list.arg_aux List.argAux
@[simp]
theorem foldl_argAux_eq_none : l.foldl (argAux r) o = none ↔ l = [] ∧ o = none :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp) fun tl hd => by
simp only [foldl_append, foldl_cons, argAux, foldl_nil, append_eq_nil, and_false, false_and,
iff_false]; cases foldl (argAux r) o tl <;> simp; try split_ifs <;> simp
#align list.foldl_arg_aux_eq_none List.foldl_argAux_eq_none
private theorem foldl_argAux_mem (l) : ∀ a m : α, m ∈ foldl (argAux r) (some a) l → m ∈ a :: l :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp [eq_comm])
(by
intro tl hd ih a m
simp only [foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, argAux]
cases hf : foldl (argAux r) (some a) tl
· simp (config := { contextual := true })
· dsimp only
split_ifs
· simp (config := { contextual := true })
· -- `finish [ih _ _ hf]` closes this goal
simp only [List.mem_cons] at ih
rcases ih _ _ hf with rfl | H
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
find?, eq_comm, mem_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, true_or, implies_true]
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) [@eq_comm _ _ m, H])
@[simp]
theorem argAux_self (hr₀ : Irreflexive r) (a : α) : argAux r (some a) a = a :=
if_neg <| hr₀ _
#align list.arg_aux_self List.argAux_self
theorem not_of_mem_foldl_argAux (hr₀ : Irreflexive r) (hr₁ : Transitive r) :
∀ {a m : α} {o : Option α}, a ∈ l → m ∈ foldl (argAux r) o l → ¬r a m := by
induction' l using List.reverseRecOn with tl a ih
· simp
intro b m o hb ho
rw [foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, argAux] at ho
cases' hf : foldl (argAux r) o tl with c
· rw [hf] at ho
rw [foldl_argAux_eq_none] at hf
simp_all [hf.1, hf.2, hr₀ _]
rw [hf, Option.mem_def] at ho
dsimp only at ho
split_ifs at ho with hac <;> cases' mem_append.1 hb with h h <;>
injection ho with ho <;> subst ho
· exact fun hba => ih h hf (hr₁ hba hac)
· simp_all [hr₀ _]
· exact ih h hf
· simp_all
#align list.not_of_mem_foldl_arg_aux List.not_of_mem_foldl_argAux
end ArgAux
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] [@DecidableRel β (· < ·)] {f : α → β} {l : List α} {o : Option α} {a m : α}
/-- `argmax f l` returns `some a`, where `f a` is maximal among the elements of `l`, in the sense
that there is no `b ∈ l` with `f a < f b`. If `a`, `b` are such that `f a = f b`, it returns
whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list. `argmax f [] = none`. -/
def argmax (f : α → β) (l : List α) : Option α :=
l.foldl (argAux fun b c => f c < f b) none
#align list.argmax List.argmax
/-- `argmin f l` returns `some a`, where `f a` is minimal among the elements of `l`, in the sense
that there is no `b ∈ l` with `f b < f a`. If `a`, `b` are such that `f a = f b`, it returns
whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list. `argmin f [] = none`. -/
def argmin (f : α → β) (l : List α) :=
l.foldl (argAux fun b c => f b < f c) none
#align list.argmin List.argmin
@[simp]
theorem argmax_nil (f : α → β) : argmax f [] = none :=
rfl
#align list.argmax_nil List.argmax_nil
@[simp]
theorem argmin_nil (f : α → β) : argmin f [] = none :=
rfl
#align list.argmin_nil List.argmin_nil
@[simp]
theorem argmax_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : argmax f [a] = a :=
rfl
#align list.argmax_singleton List.argmax_singleton
@[simp]
theorem argmin_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : argmin f [a] = a :=
rfl
#align list.argmin_singleton List.argmin_singleton
theorem not_lt_of_mem_argmax : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmax f l → ¬f m < f a :=
not_of_mem_foldl_argAux _ (fun x h => lt_irrefl (f x) h)
(fun _ _ z hxy hyz => lt_trans (a := f z) hyz hxy)
#align list.not_lt_of_mem_argmax List.not_lt_of_mem_argmax
theorem not_lt_of_mem_argmin : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmin f l → ¬f a < f m :=
not_of_mem_foldl_argAux _ (fun x h => lt_irrefl (f x) h)
(fun x _ _ hxy hyz => lt_trans (a := f x) hxy hyz)
#align list.not_lt_of_mem_argmin List.not_lt_of_mem_argmin
theorem argmax_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmax f (l ++ [a]) =
Option.casesOn (argmax f l) (some a) fun c => if f c < f a then some a else some c := by
rw [argmax, argmax]; simp [argAux]
#align list.argmax_concat List.argmax_concat
theorem argmin_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmin f (l ++ [a]) =
Option.casesOn (argmin f l) (some a) fun c => if f a < f c then some a else some c :=
@argmax_concat _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align list.argmin_concat List.argmin_concat
theorem argmax_mem : ∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmax f l → m ∈ l
| [], m => by simp
| hd :: tl, m => by simpa [argmax, argAux] using foldl_argAux_mem _ tl hd m
#align list.argmax_mem List.argmax_mem
theorem argmin_mem : ∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmin f l → m ∈ l :=
@argmax_mem _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align list.argmin_mem List.argmin_mem
@[simp]
theorem argmax_eq_none : l.argmax f = none ↔ l = [] := by simp [argmax]
#align list.argmax_eq_none List.argmax_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem argmin_eq_none : l.argmin f = none ↔ l = [] :=
@argmax_eq_none _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align list.argmin_eq_none List.argmin_eq_none
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : List α} {o : Option α} {a m : α}
theorem le_of_mem_argmax : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmax f l → f a ≤ f m := fun ha hm =>
le_of_not_lt <| not_lt_of_mem_argmax ha hm
#align list.le_of_mem_argmax List.le_of_mem_argmax
theorem le_of_mem_argmin : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmin f l → f m ≤ f a :=
@le_of_mem_argmax _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align list.le_of_mem_argmin List.le_of_mem_argmin
theorem argmax_cons (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmax f (a :: l) =
Option.casesOn (argmax f l) (some a) fun c => if f a < f c then some c else some a :=
List.reverseRecOn l rfl fun hd tl ih => by
rw [← cons_append, argmax_concat, ih, argmax_concat]
cases' h : argmax f hd with m
· simp [h]
dsimp
rw [← apply_ite, ← apply_ite]
dsimp
split_ifs <;> try rfl
· exact absurd (lt_trans ‹f a < f m› ‹_›) ‹_›
· cases (‹f a < f tl›.lt_or_lt _).elim ‹_› ‹_›
#align list.argmax_cons List.argmax_cons
theorem argmin_cons (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmin f (a :: l) =
Option.casesOn (argmin f l) (some a) fun c => if f c < f a then some c else some a :=
@argmax_cons α βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align list.argmin_cons List.argmin_cons
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem index_of_argmax :
∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmax f l → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l → f m ≤ f a → l.indexOf m ≤ l.indexOf a
| [], m, _, _, _, _ => by simp
| hd :: tl, m, hm, a, ha, ham => by
simp only [indexOf_cons, argmax_cons, Option.mem_def] at hm ⊢
cases h : argmax f tl
· rw [h] at hm
simp_all
rw [h] at hm
dsimp only at hm
simp only [cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
obtain ha | ha := ha <;> split_ifs at hm <;> injection hm with hm <;> subst hm
· cases not_le_of_lt ‹_› ‹_›
· rw [if_pos rfl]
· rw [if_neg, if_neg]
· exact Nat.succ_le_succ (index_of_argmax h (by assumption) ham)
· exact ne_of_apply_ne f (lt_of_lt_of_le ‹_› ‹_›).ne
· exact ne_of_apply_ne _ ‹f hd < f _›.ne
· rw [if_pos rfl]
exact Nat.zero_le _
#align list.index_of_argmax List.index_of_argmax
theorem index_of_argmin :
∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmin f l → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l → f a ≤ f m → l.indexOf m ≤ l.indexOf a :=
@index_of_argmax _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align list.index_of_argmin List.index_of_argmin
theorem mem_argmax_iff :
m ∈ argmax f l ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a → l.indexOf m ≤ l.indexOf a :=
⟨fun hm => ⟨argmax_mem hm, fun a ha => le_of_mem_argmax ha hm, fun _ => index_of_argmax hm⟩,
by
rintro ⟨hml, ham, hma⟩
cases' harg : argmax f l with n
· simp_all
· have :=
_root_.le_antisymm (hma n (argmax_mem harg) (le_of_mem_argmax hml harg))
(index_of_argmax harg hml (ham _ (argmax_mem harg)))
rw [(indexOf_inj hml (argmax_mem harg)).1 this, Option.mem_def]⟩
#align list.mem_argmax_iff List.mem_argmax_iff
theorem argmax_eq_some_iff :
argmax f l = some m ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a → l.indexOf m ≤ l.indexOf a :=
mem_argmax_iff
#align list.argmax_eq_some_iff List.argmax_eq_some_iff
theorem mem_argmin_iff :
m ∈ argmin f l ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m → l.indexOf m ≤ l.indexOf a :=
@mem_argmax_iff _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align list.mem_argmin_iff List.mem_argmin_iff
theorem argmin_eq_some_iff :
argmin f l = some m ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m → l.indexOf m ≤ l.indexOf a :=
mem_argmin_iff
#align list.argmin_eq_some_iff List.argmin_eq_some_iff
end LinearOrder
section MaximumMinimum
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [@DecidableRel α (· < ·)] {l : List α} {a m : α}
/-- `maximum l` returns a `WithBot α`, the largest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊥` for
`[]` -/
def maximum (l : List α) : WithBot α :=
argmax id l
#align list.maximum List.maximum
/-- `minimum l` returns a `WithTop α`, the smallest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊤` for
`[]` -/
def minimum (l : List α) : WithTop α :=
argmin id l
#align list.minimum List.minimum
@[simp]
theorem maximum_nil : maximum ([] : List α) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align list.maximum_nil List.maximum_nil
@[simp]
theorem minimum_nil : minimum ([] : List α) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align list.minimum_nil List.minimum_nil
@[simp]
theorem maximum_singleton (a : α) : maximum [a] = a :=
rfl
#align list.maximum_singleton List.maximum_singleton
@[simp]
theorem minimum_singleton (a : α) : minimum [a] = a :=
rfl
#align list.minimum_singleton List.minimum_singleton
theorem maximum_mem {l : List α} {m : α} : (maximum l : WithTop α) = m → m ∈ l :=
argmax_mem
#align list.maximum_mem List.maximum_mem
theorem minimum_mem {l : List α} {m : α} : (minimum l : WithBot α) = m → m ∈ l :=
argmin_mem
#align list.minimum_mem List.minimum_mem
@[simp]
theorem maximum_eq_bot {l : List α} : l.maximum = ⊥ ↔ l = [] :=
argmax_eq_none
@[simp, deprecated maximum_eq_bot "Don't mix Option and WithBot" (since := "2024-05-27")]
theorem maximum_eq_none {l : List α} : l.maximum = none ↔ l = [] := maximum_eq_bot
#align list.maximum_eq_none List.maximum_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem minimum_eq_top {l : List α} : l.minimum = ⊤ ↔ l = [] :=
argmin_eq_none
@[simp, deprecated minimum_eq_top "Don't mix Option and WithTop" (since := "2024-05-27")]
theorem minimum_eq_none {l : List α} : l.minimum = none ↔ l = [] := minimum_eq_top
#align list.minimum_eq_none List.minimum_eq_none
theorem not_lt_maximum_of_mem : a ∈ l → (maximum l : WithBot α) = m → ¬m < a :=
not_lt_of_mem_argmax
#align list.not_lt_maximum_of_mem List.not_lt_maximum_of_mem
theorem minimum_not_lt_of_mem : a ∈ l → (minimum l : WithTop α) = m → ¬a < m :=
not_lt_of_mem_argmin
#align list.minimum_not_lt_of_mem List.minimum_not_lt_of_mem
theorem not_lt_maximum_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : ¬maximum l < (a : WithBot α) := by
cases h : l.maximum
· simp_all
· simp [not_lt_maximum_of_mem ha h, not_false_iff]
#align list.not_lt_maximum_of_mem' List.not_lt_maximum_of_mem'
theorem not_lt_minimum_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : ¬(a : WithTop α) < minimum l :=
@not_lt_maximum_of_mem' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ ha
#align list.not_lt_minimum_of_mem' List.not_lt_minimum_of_mem'
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {l : List α} {a m : α}
theorem maximum_concat (a : α) (l : List α) : maximum (l ++ [a]) = max (maximum l) a := by
simp only [maximum, argmax_concat, id]
cases argmax id l
· exact (max_eq_right bot_le).symm
· simp [WithBot.some_eq_coe, max_def_lt, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
#align list.maximum_concat List.maximum_concat
theorem le_maximum_of_mem : a ∈ l → (maximum l : WithBot α) = m → a ≤ m :=
le_of_mem_argmax
#align list.le_maximum_of_mem List.le_maximum_of_mem
theorem minimum_le_of_mem : a ∈ l → (minimum l : WithTop α) = m → m ≤ a :=
le_of_mem_argmin
#align list.minimum_le_of_mem List.minimum_le_of_mem
theorem le_maximum_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : (a : WithBot α) ≤ maximum l :=
le_of_not_lt <| not_lt_maximum_of_mem' ha
#align list.le_maximum_of_mem' List.le_maximum_of_mem'
theorem minimum_le_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : minimum l ≤ (a : WithTop α) :=
@le_maximum_of_mem' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ ha
#align list.le_minimum_of_mem' List.minimum_le_of_mem'
theorem minimum_concat (a : α) (l : List α) : minimum (l ++ [a]) = min (minimum l) a :=
@maximum_concat αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align list.minimum_concat List.minimum_concat
theorem maximum_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : maximum (a :: l) = max ↑a (maximum l) :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp [@max_eq_left (WithBot α) _ _ _ bot_le]) fun tl hd ih => by
rw [← cons_append, maximum_concat, ih, maximum_concat, max_assoc]
#align list.maximum_cons List.maximum_cons
theorem minimum_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : minimum (a :: l) = min ↑a (minimum l) :=
@maximum_cons αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align list.minimum_cons List.minimum_cons
theorem maximum_le_of_forall_le {b : WithBot α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, a ≤ b) : l.maximum ≤ b := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
simp only [maximum_cons, ge_iff_le, max_le_iff, WithBot.coe_le_coe]
exact ⟨h a (by simp), ih fun a w => h a (mem_cons.mpr (Or.inr w))⟩
theorem le_minimum_of_forall_le {b : WithTop α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, b ≤ a) : b ≤ l.minimum :=
maximum_le_of_forall_le (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem maximum_eq_coe_iff : maximum l = m ↔ m ∈ l ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, a ≤ m := by
rw [maximum, ← WithBot.some_eq_coe, argmax_eq_some_iff]
simp only [id_eq, and_congr_right_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
intro _ h a hal hma
rw [_root_.le_antisymm hma (h a hal)]
#align list.maximum_eq_coe_iff List.maximum_eq_coe_iff
theorem minimum_eq_coe_iff : minimum l = m ↔ m ∈ l ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, m ≤ a :=
@maximum_eq_coe_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align list.minimum_eq_coe_iff List.minimum_eq_coe_iff
theorem coe_le_maximum_iff : a ≤ l.maximum ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ l ∧ a ≤ b := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons h t ih =>
simp [maximum_cons, ih]
theorem minimum_le_coe_iff : l.minimum ≤ a ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ l ∧ b ≤ a :=
coe_le_maximum_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem maximum_ne_bot_of_ne_nil (h : l ≠ []) : l.maximum ≠ ⊥ :=
match l, h with | _ :: _, _ => by simp [maximum_cons]
theorem minimum_ne_top_of_ne_nil (h : l ≠ []) : l.minimum ≠ ⊤ :=
@maximum_ne_bot_of_ne_nil αᵒᵈ _ _ h
theorem maximum_ne_bot_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) : l.maximum ≠ ⊥ :=
match l, h with | _ :: _, _ => by simp [maximum_cons]
theorem minimum_ne_top_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) : l.minimum ≠ ⊤ :=
maximum_ne_bot_of_length_pos (α := αᵒᵈ) h
/-- The maximum value in a non-empty `List`. -/
def maximum_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) : α :=
WithBot.unbot l.maximum (maximum_ne_bot_of_length_pos h)
/-- The minimum value in a non-empty `List`. -/
def minimum_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) : α :=
maximum_of_length_pos (α := αᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
lemma coe_maximum_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) :
(l.maximum_of_length_pos h : α) = l.maximum :=
WithBot.coe_unbot _ _
@[simp]
lemma coe_minimum_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) :
(l.minimum_of_length_pos h : α) = l.minimum :=
WithTop.coe_untop _ _
@[simp]
theorem le_maximum_of_length_pos_iff {b : α} (h : 0 < l.length) :
b ≤ maximum_of_length_pos h ↔ b ≤ l.maximum :=
WithBot.le_unbot_iff _
@[simp]
theorem minimum_of_length_pos_le_iff {b : α} (h : 0 < l.length) :
minimum_of_length_pos h ≤ b ↔ l.minimum ≤ b :=
le_maximum_of_length_pos_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) h
| Mathlib/Data/List/MinMax.lean | 459 | 462 | theorem maximum_of_length_pos_mem (h : 0 < l.length) :
maximum_of_length_pos h ∈ l := by |
apply maximum_mem
simp only [coe_maximum_of_length_pos]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Ray
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
#align_import linear_algebra.orientation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0c1d80f5a86b36c1db32e021e8d19ae7809d5b79"
/-!
# Orientations of modules
This file defines orientations of modules.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation` is a type synonym for `Module.Ray` for the case where the module is that of
alternating maps from a module to its underlying ring. An orientation may be associated with an
alternating map or with a basis.
* `Module.Oriented` is a type class for a choice of orientation of a module that is considered
the positive orientation.
## Implementation notes
`Orientation` is defined for an arbitrary index type, but the main intended use case is when
that index type is a `Fintype` and there exists a basis of the same cardinality.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientation_(vector_space)
-/
noncomputable section
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable (R : Type*) [StrictOrderedCommSemiring R]
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (ι ι' : Type*)
/-- An orientation of a module, intended to be used when `ι` is a `Fintype` with the same
cardinality as a basis. -/
abbrev Orientation := Module.Ray R (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R)
#align orientation Orientation
/-- A type class fixing an orientation of a module. -/
class Module.Oriented where
/-- Fix a positive orientation. -/
positiveOrientation : Orientation R M ι
#align module.oriented Module.Oriented
export Module.Oriented (positiveOrientation)
variable {R M}
/-- An equivalence between modules implies an equivalence between orientations. -/
def Orientation.map (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : Orientation R M ι ≃ Orientation R N ι :=
Module.Ray.map <| AlternatingMap.domLCongr R R ι R e
#align orientation.map Orientation.map
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (v : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Orientation.map ι e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) =
rayOfNeZero _ (v.compLinearMap e.symm) (mt (v.compLinearEquiv_eq_zero_iff e.symm).mp hv) :=
rfl
#align orientation.map_apply Orientation.map_apply
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_refl : (Orientation.map ι <| LinearEquiv.refl R M) = Equiv.refl _ := by
rw [Orientation.map, AlternatingMap.domLCongr_refl, Module.Ray.map_refl]
#align orientation.map_refl Orientation.map_refl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_symm (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
(Orientation.map ι e).symm = Orientation.map ι e.symm := rfl
#align orientation.map_symm Orientation.map_symm
section Reindex
variable (R M) {ι ι'}
/-- An equivalence between indices implies an equivalence between orientations. -/
def Orientation.reindex (e : ι ≃ ι') : Orientation R M ι ≃ Orientation R M ι' :=
Module.Ray.map <| AlternatingMap.domDomCongrₗ R e
#align orientation.reindex Orientation.reindex
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_apply (e : ι ≃ ι') (v : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Orientation.reindex R M e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) =
rayOfNeZero _ (v.domDomCongr e) (mt (v.domDomCongr_eq_zero_iff e).mp hv) :=
rfl
#align orientation.reindex_apply Orientation.reindex_apply
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_refl : (Orientation.reindex R M <| Equiv.refl ι) = Equiv.refl _ := by
rw [Orientation.reindex, AlternatingMap.domDomCongrₗ_refl, Module.Ray.map_refl]
#align orientation.reindex_refl Orientation.reindex_refl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_symm (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(Orientation.reindex R M e).symm = Orientation.reindex R M e.symm :=
rfl
#align orientation.reindex_symm Orientation.reindex_symm
end Reindex
/-- A module is canonically oriented with respect to an empty index type. -/
instance (priority := 100) IsEmpty.oriented [IsEmpty ι] : Module.Oriented R M ι where
positiveOrientation :=
rayOfNeZero R (AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty 1) <|
AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.injective.ne (by exact one_ne_zero)
#align is_empty.oriented IsEmpty.oriented
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_positiveOrientation_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
Orientation.map ι f positiveOrientation = positiveOrientation := rfl
#align orientation.map_positive_orientation_of_is_empty Orientation.map_positiveOrientation_of_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (x : Orientation R M ι) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) :
Orientation.map ι f x = x := by
induction' x using Module.Ray.ind with g hg
rw [Orientation.map_apply]
congr
ext i
rw [AlternatingMap.compLinearMap_apply]
congr
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align orientation.map_of_is_empty Orientation.map_of_isEmpty
end OrderedCommSemiring
section OrderedCommRing
variable {R : Type*} [StrictOrderedCommRing R]
variable {M N : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R M] [Module R N]
@[simp]
protected theorem Orientation.map_neg {ι : Type*} (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (x : Orientation R M ι) :
Orientation.map ι f (-x) = -Orientation.map ι f x :=
Module.Ray.map_neg _ x
#align orientation.map_neg Orientation.map_neg
@[simp]
protected theorem Orientation.reindex_neg {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') (x : Orientation R M ι) :
Orientation.reindex R M e (-x) = -Orientation.reindex R M e x :=
Module.Ray.map_neg _ x
#align orientation.reindex_neg Orientation.reindex_neg
namespace Basis
variable {ι ι' : Type*}
/-- The value of `Orientation.map` when the index type has the cardinality of a basis, in terms
of `f.det`. -/
theorem map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul [Finite ι] (e : Basis ι R M) (x : Orientation R M ι)
(f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : Orientation.map ι f x = (LinearEquiv.det f)⁻¹ • x := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
letI := Classical.decEq ι
induction' x using Module.Ray.ind with g hg
rw [Orientation.map_apply, smul_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff, Units.smul_def,
(g.compLinearMap f.symm).eq_smul_basis_det e, g.eq_smul_basis_det e,
AlternatingMap.compLinearMap_apply, AlternatingMap.smul_apply,
show (fun i ↦ (LinearEquiv.symm f).toLinearMap (e i)) = (LinearEquiv.symm f).toLinearMap ∘ e
by rfl, Basis.det_comp, Basis.det_self, mul_one, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul,
LinearEquiv.coe_inv_det]
#align basis.map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul Basis.map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul
variable [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι'] [DecidableEq ι']
/-- The orientation given by a basis. -/
protected def orientation (e : Basis ι R M) : Orientation R M ι :=
rayOfNeZero R _ e.det_ne_zero
#align basis.orientation Basis.orientation
theorem orientation_map (e : Basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
(e.map f).orientation = Orientation.map ι f e.orientation := by
simp_rw [Basis.orientation, Orientation.map_apply, Basis.det_map']
#align basis.orientation_map Basis.orientation_map
theorem orientation_reindex (e : Basis ι R M) (eι : ι ≃ ι') :
(e.reindex eι).orientation = Orientation.reindex R M eι e.orientation := by
simp_rw [Basis.orientation, Orientation.reindex_apply, Basis.det_reindex']
#align basis.orientation_reindex Basis.orientation_reindex
/-- The orientation given by a basis derived using `units_smul`, in terms of the product of those
units. -/
theorem orientation_unitsSMul (e : Basis ι R M) (w : ι → Units R) :
(e.unitsSMul w).orientation = (∏ i, w i)⁻¹ • e.orientation := by
rw [Basis.orientation, Basis.orientation, smul_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff,
e.det.eq_smul_basis_det (e.unitsSMul w), det_unitsSMul_self, Units.smul_def, smul_smul]
norm_cast
simp only [mul_left_inv, Units.val_one, one_smul]
exact SameRay.rfl
#align basis.orientation_units_smul Basis.orientation_unitsSMul
@[simp]
theorem orientation_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
b.orientation = positiveOrientation := by
rw [Basis.orientation]
congr
exact b.det_isEmpty
#align basis.orientation_is_empty Basis.orientation_isEmpty
end Basis
end OrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable {R : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace Orientation
/-- A module `M` over a linearly ordered commutative ring has precisely two "orientations" with
respect to an empty index type. (Note that these are only orientations of `M` of in the conventional
mathematical sense if `M` is zero-dimensional.) -/
theorem eq_or_eq_neg_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (o : Orientation R M ι) :
o = positiveOrientation ∨ o = -positiveOrientation := by
induction' o using Module.Ray.ind with x hx
dsimp [positiveOrientation]
simp only [ray_eq_iff, sameRay_neg_swap]
rw [sameRay_or_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
intro h
set f : (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) ≃ₗ[R] R := AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.symm
have H : LinearIndependent R ![f x, 1] := by
convert h.map' f.toLinearMap f.ker
ext i
fin_cases i <;> simp [f]
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at H
simpa using H Finset.univ ![1, -f x] (by simp [Fin.sum_univ_succ]) 0 (by simp)
#align orientation.eq_or_eq_neg_of_is_empty Orientation.eq_or_eq_neg_of_isEmpty
end Orientation
namespace Basis
variable [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
/-- The orientations given by two bases are equal if and only if the determinant of one basis
with respect to the other is positive. -/
theorem orientation_eq_iff_det_pos (e₁ e₂ : Basis ι R M) :
e₁.orientation = e₂.orientation ↔ 0 < e₁.det e₂ :=
calc
e₁.orientation = e₂.orientation ↔ SameRay R e₁.det e₂.det := ray_eq_iff _ _
_ ↔ SameRay R (e₁.det e₂ • e₂.det) e₂.det := by rw [← e₁.det.eq_smul_basis_det e₂]
_ ↔ 0 < e₁.det e₂ := sameRay_smul_left_iff_of_ne e₂.det_ne_zero (e₁.isUnit_det e₂).ne_zero
#align basis.orientation_eq_iff_det_pos Basis.orientation_eq_iff_det_pos
/-- Given a basis, any orientation equals the orientation given by that basis or its negation. -/
theorem orientation_eq_or_eq_neg (e : Basis ι R M) (x : Orientation R M ι) :
x = e.orientation ∨ x = -e.orientation := by
induction' x using Module.Ray.ind with x hx
rw [← x.map_basis_ne_zero_iff e] at hx
rwa [Basis.orientation, ray_eq_iff, neg_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff, x.eq_smul_basis_det e,
sameRay_neg_smul_left_iff_of_ne e.det_ne_zero hx, sameRay_smul_left_iff_of_ne e.det_ne_zero hx,
lt_or_lt_iff_ne, ne_comm]
#align basis.orientation_eq_or_eq_neg Basis.orientation_eq_or_eq_neg
/-- Given a basis, an orientation equals the negation of that given by that basis if and only
if it does not equal that given by that basis. -/
theorem orientation_ne_iff_eq_neg (e : Basis ι R M) (x : Orientation R M ι) :
x ≠ e.orientation ↔ x = -e.orientation :=
⟨fun h => (e.orientation_eq_or_eq_neg x).resolve_left h, fun h =>
h.symm ▸ (Module.Ray.ne_neg_self e.orientation).symm⟩
#align basis.orientation_ne_iff_eq_neg Basis.orientation_ne_iff_eq_neg
/-- Composing a basis with a linear equiv gives the same orientation if and only if the
determinant is positive. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Orientation.lean | 278 | 281 | theorem orientation_comp_linearEquiv_eq_iff_det_pos (e : Basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) :
(e.map f).orientation = e.orientation ↔ 0 < LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[R] M) := by |
rw [orientation_map, e.map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul, units_inv_smul, units_smul_eq_self_iff,
LinearEquiv.coe_det]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Paul van Wamelen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul van Wamelen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Data.Int.NatPrime
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
#align_import number_theory.pythagorean_triples from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Pythagorean Triples
The main result is the classification of Pythagorean triples. The final result is for general
Pythagorean triples. It follows from the more interesting relatively prime case. We use the
"rational parametrization of the circle" method for the proof. The parametrization maps the point
`(x / z, y / z)` to the slope of the line through `(-1 , 0)` and `(x / z, y / z)`. This quickly
shows that `(x / z, y / z) = (2 * m * n / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2), (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2))` where
`m / n` is the slope. In order to identify numerators and denominators we now need results showing
that these are coprime. This is easy except for the prime 2. In order to deal with that we have to
analyze the parity of `x`, `y`, `m` and `n` and eliminate all the impossible cases. This takes up
the bulk of the proof below.
-/
theorem sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : ZMod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 := by
change Fin 4 at z
fin_cases z <;> decide
#align sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four
theorem Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : z * z % 4 ≠ 2 := by
suffices ¬z * z % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ) by exact this
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff']
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
#align int.sq_ne_two_mod_four Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
/-- Three integers `x`, `y`, and `z` form a Pythagorean triple if `x * x + y * y = z * z`. -/
def PythagoreanTriple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop :=
x * x + y * y = z * z
#align pythagorean_triple PythagoreanTriple
/-- Pythagorean triples are interchangeable, i.e `x * x + y * y = y * y + x * x = z * z`.
This comes from additive commutativity. -/
theorem pythagoreanTriple_comm {x y z : ℤ} : PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔ PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
rw [add_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple_comm pythagoreanTriple_comm
/-- The zeroth Pythagorean triple is all zeros. -/
theorem PythagoreanTriple.zero : PythagoreanTriple 0 0 0 := by
simp only [PythagoreanTriple, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align pythagorean_triple.zero PythagoreanTriple.zero
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
theorem eq : x * x + y * y = z * z :=
h
#align pythagorean_triple.eq PythagoreanTriple.eq
@[symm]
theorem symm : PythagoreanTriple y x z := by rwa [pythagoreanTriple_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple.symm PythagoreanTriple.symm
/-- A triple is still a triple if you multiply `x`, `y` and `z`
by a constant `k`. -/
theorem mul (k : ℤ) : PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) :=
calc
k * x * (k * x) + k * y * (k * y) = k ^ 2 * (x * x + y * y) := by ring
_ = k ^ 2 * (z * z) := by rw [h.eq]
_ = k * z * (k * z) := by ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul PythagoreanTriple.mul
/-- `(k*x, k*y, k*z)` is a Pythagorean triple if and only if
`(x, y, z)` is also a triple. -/
theorem mul_iff (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) ↔ PythagoreanTriple x y z := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.mul k⟩
simp only [PythagoreanTriple]
intro h
rw [← mul_left_inj' (mul_ne_zero hk hk)]
convert h using 1 <;> ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul_iff PythagoreanTriple.mul_iff
/-- A Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is “classified” if there exist integers `k, m, n` such that
either
* `x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)` and `y = k * (2 * m * n)`, or
* `x = k * (2 * m * n)` and `y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ k m n : ℤ,
(x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n) ∨
x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1
#align pythagorean_triple.is_classified PythagoreanTriple.IsClassified
/-- A primitive Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is a Pythagorean triple with `x` and `y` coprime.
Such a triple is “primitively classified” if there exist coprime integers `m, n` such that either
* `x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2` and `y = 2 * m * n`, or
* `x = 2 * m * n` and `y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2`.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsPrimitiveClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ m n : ℤ,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)
#align pythagorean_triple.is_primitive_classified PythagoreanTriple.IsPrimitiveClassified
theorem mul_isClassified (k : ℤ) (hc : h.IsClassified) : (h.mul k).IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨l, m, n, ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co⟩⟩ := hc
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
left
constructor <;> ring
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
right
constructor <;> ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul_is_classified PythagoreanTriple.mul_isClassified
theorem even_odd_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) :
x % 2 = 0 ∧ y % 2 = 1 ∨ x % 2 = 1 ∧ y % 2 = 0 := by
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with hx hx <;>
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one y with hy hy
-- x even, y even
· exfalso
apply Nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (by decide : 1 < 2) _ _ hc
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hx
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hy
-- x even, y odd
· left
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y even
· right
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y odd
· exfalso
obtain ⟨x0, y0, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ x0 y0, x = x0 * 2 + 1 ∧ y = y0 * 2 + 1 := by
cases' exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_sub_of_emod_eq hx) with x0 hx2
cases' exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_sub_of_emod_eq hy) with y0 hy2
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hx2 hy2
exact ⟨x0, y0, hx2, hy2⟩
apply Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four z
rw [show z * z = 4 * (x0 * x0 + x0 + y0 * y0 + y0) + 2 by
rw [← h.eq]
ring]
simp only [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod_right, zero_add]
decide
#align pythagorean_triple.even_odd_of_coprime PythagoreanTriple.even_odd_of_coprime
theorem gcd_dvd : (Int.gcd x y : ℤ) ∣ z := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hz, dvd_zero]
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, _, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_ofNat, one_mul]
rw [← Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero, sq z, ← h.eq]
rw [(by ring : x0 * k * (x0 * k) + y0 * k * (y0 * k) = (k : ℤ) ^ 2 * (x0 * x0 + y0 * y0))]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align pythagorean_triple.gcd_dvd PythagoreanTriple.gcd_dvd
theorem normalize : PythagoreanTriple (x / Int.gcd x y) (y / Int.gcd x y) (z / Int.gcd x y) := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hx, hy, hz, Int.zero_div]
exact zero
rcases h.gcd_dvd with ⟨z0, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, k0, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
have hk : (k : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by
norm_cast
rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero] at k0
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_ofNat, one_mul] at h ⊢
rw [mul_comm x0, mul_comm y0, mul_iff k hk] at h
rwa [Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ hk]
#align pythagorean_triple.normalize PythagoreanTriple.normalize
theorem isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified (hp : h.IsPrimitiveClassified) : h.IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := hp
use 1, m, n
rcases H with ⟨t, co, _⟩
rw [one_mul, one_mul]
exact ⟨t, co⟩
#align pythagorean_triple.is_classified_of_is_primitive_classified PythagoreanTriple.isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified
theorem isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified (hc : h.normalize.IsPrimitiveClassified) :
h.IsClassified := by
convert h.normalize.mul_isClassified (Int.gcd x y)
(isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified h.normalize hc) <;>
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel']
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_left
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_right
· exact h.gcd_dvd
#align pythagorean_triple.is_classified_of_normalize_is_primitive_classified PythagoreanTriple.isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified
theorem ne_zero_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : z ≠ 0 := by
suffices 0 < z * z by
rintro rfl
norm_num at this
rw [← h.eq, ← sq, ← sq]
have hc' : Int.gcd x y ≠ 0 := by
rw [hc]
exact one_ne_zero
cases' Int.ne_zero_of_gcd hc' with hxz hyz
· apply lt_add_of_pos_of_le (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hxz) (sq_nonneg y)
· apply lt_add_of_le_of_pos (sq_nonneg x) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hyz)
#align pythagorean_triple.ne_zero_of_coprime PythagoreanTriple.ne_zero_of_coprime
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_zero_left (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hx : x = 0) :
h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
subst x
change Nat.gcd 0 (Int.natAbs y) = 1 at hc
rw [Nat.gcd_zero_left (Int.natAbs y)] at hc
cases' Int.natAbs_eq y with hy hy
· use 1, 0
rw [hy, hc, Int.gcd_zero_right]
decide
· use 0, 1
rw [hy, hc, Int.gcd_zero_left]
decide
#align pythagorean_triple.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_zero_left PythagoreanTriple.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_zero_left
theorem coprime_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : Int.gcd y z = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpy, hpz⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← hc]
apply Nat.dvd_gcd (Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp _ _) hpy
rw [sq, eq_sub_of_add_eq h]
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hpy hpz
exact dvd_sub (hpz.mul_right _) (hpy.mul_right _)
#align pythagorean_triple.coprime_of_coprime PythagoreanTriple.coprime_of_coprime
end PythagoreanTriple
section circleEquivGen
/-!
### A parametrization of the unit circle
For the classification of Pythagorean triples, we will use a parametrization of the unit circle.
-/
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- A parameterization of the unit circle that is useful for classifying Pythagorean triples.
(To be applied in the case where `K = ℚ`.) -/
def circleEquivGen (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
K ≃ { p : K × K // p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 } where
toFun x :=
⟨⟨2 * x / (1 + x ^ 2), (1 - x ^ 2) / (1 + x ^ 2)⟩, by
field_simp [hk x, div_pow]
ring, by
simp only [Ne, div_eq_iff (hk x), neg_mul, one_mul, neg_add, sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_inj]
simpa only [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, one_pow] using hk 1⟩
invFun p := (p : K × K).1 / ((p : K × K).2 + 1)
left_inv x := by
have h2 : (1 + 1 : K) = 2 := by norm_num -- Porting note: rfl is not enough to close this
have h3 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := by
convert hk 1
rw [one_pow 2, h2]
field_simp [hk x, h2, add_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_cancel, mul_comm]
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy, hy⟩ => by
change x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = 1 at hxy
have h2 : y + 1 ≠ 0 := mt eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hy
have h3 : (y + 1) ^ 2 + x ^ 2 = 2 * (y + 1) := by
rw [(add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm).symm]
ring
have h4 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := by
convert hk 1
rw [one_pow 2]
ring -- Porting note: rfl is not enough to close this
simp only [Prod.mk.inj_iff, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
constructor
· field_simp [h3]
ring
· field_simp [h3]
rw [← add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm]
ring
#align circle_equiv_gen circleEquivGen
@[simp]
theorem circleEquivGen_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0) (x : K) :
(circleEquivGen hk x : K × K) = ⟨2 * x / (1 + x ^ 2), (1 - x ^ 2) / (1 + x ^ 2)⟩ :=
rfl
#align circle_equiv_apply circleEquivGen_apply
@[simp]
theorem circleEquivGen_symm_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0)
(v : { p : K × K // p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 }) :
(circleEquivGen hk).symm v = (v : K × K).1 / ((v : K × K).2 + 1) :=
rfl
#align circle_equiv_symm_apply circleEquivGen_symm_apply
end circleEquivGen
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 0)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
have h2m : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * m ^ 2 := by
convert dvd_add hp2 hp1 using 1
ring
have h2n : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * n ^ 2 := by
convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1 using 1
ring
have hmc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ Int.natAbs m := prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2m
have hnc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ Int.natAbs n := prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2n
by_cases h2 : p = 2
-- Porting note: norm_num is not enough to close h3
· have h3 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 1 := by
simp only [sq, Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod, hm, hn, dvd_refl, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd]
decide
have h4 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 0 := by
apply Int.emod_eq_zero_of_dvd
rwa [h2] at hp2
rw [h4] at h3
exact zero_ne_one h3
· apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← h]
exact Nat.dvd_gcd (Or.resolve_left hmc h2) (Or.resolve_left hnc h2)
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 0) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd, ← Int.natAbs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)]
rw [(by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2), add_comm]
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd _ hn hm; rwa [Int.gcd_comm]
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 0)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
have hnp : ¬(p : ℤ) ∣ Int.gcd m n := by
rw [h]
norm_cast
exact mt Nat.dvd_one.mp (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp)
cases' Int.Prime.dvd_mul hp hp2 with hp2m hpn
· rw [Int.natAbs_mul] at hp2m
cases' (Nat.Prime.dvd_mul hp).mp hp2m with hp2 hpm
· have hp2' : p = 2 := (Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two hp2).antisymm hp.two_le
revert hp1
rw [hp2']
apply mt Int.emod_eq_zero_of_dvd
-- Porting note: norm_num is not enough to close this
simp only [sq, Nat.cast_ofNat, Int.sub_emod, Int.mul_emod, hm, hn,
mul_zero, EuclideanDomain.zero_mod, mul_one, zero_sub]
decide
apply mt (Int.dvd_gcd (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpm)) hnp
apply or_self_iff.mp
apply Int.Prime.dvd_mul' hp
rw [(by ring : n * n = -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) + m * m)]
exact hp1.neg_right.add ((Int.natCast_dvd.2 hpm).mul_right _)
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at hnp
apply mt (Int.dvd_gcd (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpn)) hnp
apply or_self_iff.mp
apply Int.Prime.dvd_mul' hp
rw [(by ring : m * m = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 + n * n)]
apply dvd_add hp1
exact (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpn).mul_right n
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 0) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd, ← Int.natAbs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)]
rw [(by ring : 2 * m * n = 2 * n * m), (by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2)]
apply coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd _ hn hm; rwa [Int.gcd_comm]
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1)
(hmn : m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) :
Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
cases' hmn with h1 h2
· exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd h h1.left h1.right
· exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even h h2.left h2.right
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) :
2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 ∧ Int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1 := by
cases' exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_sub_of_emod_eq hm) with m0 hm2
cases' exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_sub_of_emod_eq hn) with n0 hn2
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hm2 hn2
subst m
subst n
have h1 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 + (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 + n0 ^ 2 + m0 + n0) + 1) := by
ring
have h2 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 - n0 ^ 2 + m0 - n0)) := by ring
have h3 : ((m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 := by
rw [h2, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left, Int.mul_emod_right]
decide
refine ⟨⟨_, h1⟩, ⟨_, h2⟩, h3, ?_⟩
have h20 : (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by decide
rw [h1, h2, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ h20, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ h20]
by_contra h4
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp h4
apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← h]
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
apply Nat.dvd_gcd
· apply Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp
convert dvd_add hp1 hp2
ring
· apply Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp
convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1
ring
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_aux (hc : x.gcd y = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z) {m n : ℤ}
(hm2n2 : 0 < m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) (hv2 : (x : ℚ) / z = 2 * m * n / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2))
(hw2 : (y : ℚ) / z = ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 - (n : ℚ) ^ 2) / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2))
(H : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1) (co : Int.gcd m n = 1)
(pp : m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
have hz : z ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hzpos
have h2 : y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 := by
apply Rat.div_int_inj hzpos hm2n2 (h.coprime_of_coprime hc) H
rw [hw2]
norm_cast
use m, n
apply And.intro _ (And.intro co pp)
right
refine ⟨?_, h2.left⟩
rw [← Rat.coe_int_inj _ _, ← div_left_inj' ((mt (Rat.coe_int_inj z 0).mp) hz), hv2, h2.right]
norm_cast
#align pythagorean_triple.is_primitive_classified_aux PythagoreanTriple.isPrimitiveClassified_aux
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hyo : y % 2 = 1)
(hzpos : 0 < z) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
by_cases h0 : x = 0
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_zero_left hc h0
let v := (x : ℚ) / z
let w := (y : ℚ) / z
have hq : v ^ 2 + w ^ 2 = 1 := by
field_simp [v, w, sq]
norm_cast
have hvz : v ≠ 0 := by
field_simp [v]
exact h0
have hw1 : w ≠ -1 := by
contrapose! hvz with hw1
-- Porting note: `contrapose` unfolds local names, refold them
replace hw1 : w = -1 := hw1; show v = 0
rw [hw1, neg_sq, one_pow, add_left_eq_self] at hq
exact pow_eq_zero hq
have hQ : ∀ x : ℚ, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0 := by
intro q
apply ne_of_gt
exact lt_add_of_pos_of_le zero_lt_one (sq_nonneg q)
have hp : (⟨v, w⟩ : ℚ × ℚ) ∈ { p : ℚ × ℚ | p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 } := ⟨hq, hw1⟩
let q := (circleEquivGen hQ).symm ⟨⟨v, w⟩, hp⟩
have ht4 : v = 2 * q / (1 + q ^ 2) ∧ w = (1 - q ^ 2) / (1 + q ^ 2) := by
apply Prod.mk.inj
have := ((circleEquivGen hQ).apply_symm_apply ⟨⟨v, w⟩, hp⟩).symm
exact congr_arg Subtype.val this
let m := (q.den : ℤ)
let n := q.num
have hm0 : m ≠ 0 := by
-- Added to adapt to leanprover/lean4#2734.
-- Without `unfold_let`, `norm_cast` can't see the coercion.
-- One might try `zeta := true` in `Tactic.NormCast.derive`,
-- but that seems to break many other things.
unfold_let m
norm_cast
apply Rat.den_nz q
have hq2 : q = n / m := (Rat.num_div_den q).symm
have hm2n2 : 0 < m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 := by positivity
have hm2n20 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have hx1 {j k : ℚ} (h₁ : k ≠ 0) (h₂ : k ^ 2 + j ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
(1 - (j / k) ^ 2) / (1 + (j / k) ^ 2) = (k ^ 2 - j ^ 2) / (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) := by
field_simp
have hw2 : w = ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 - (n : ℚ) ^ 2) / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2) := by
calc
w = (1 - q ^ 2) / (1 + q ^ 2) := by apply ht4.2
_ = (1 - (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) / (1 + (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) := by rw [hq2]
_ = _ := by exact hx1 (Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hm0) hm2n20
have hx2 {j k : ℚ} (h₁ : k ≠ 0) (h₂ : k ^ 2 + j ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
2 * (j / k) / (1 + (j / k) ^ 2) = 2 * k * j / (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) :=
have h₃ : k * (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero h₁ h₂
by field_simp; ring
have hv2 : v = 2 * m * n / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2) := by
calc
v = 2 * q / (1 + q ^ 2) := by apply ht4.1
_ = 2 * (n / m) / (1 + (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) := by rw [hq2]
_ = _ := by exact hx2 (Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hm0) hm2n20
have hnmcp : Int.gcd n m = 1 := q.reduced
have hmncp : Int.gcd m n = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd_comm]
exact hnmcp
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one m with hm2 hm2 <;>
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with hn2 hn2
· -- m even, n even
exfalso
have h1 : 2 ∣ (Int.gcd n m : ℤ) :=
Int.dvd_gcd (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hn2) (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hm2)
rw [hnmcp] at h1
revert h1
decide
· -- m even, n odd
apply h.isPrimitiveClassified_aux hc hzpos hm2n2 hv2 hw2 _ hmncp
· apply Or.intro_left
exact And.intro hm2 hn2
· apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd hmncp hm2 hn2
· -- m odd, n even
apply h.isPrimitiveClassified_aux hc hzpos hm2n2 hv2 hw2 _ hmncp
· apply Or.intro_right
exact And.intro hm2 hn2
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even hmncp hm2 hn2
· -- m odd, n odd
exfalso
have h1 :
2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 ∧ Int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1 :=
coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd hmncp hm2 hn2
have h2 : y = (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 ∧ z = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2 := by
apply Rat.div_int_inj hzpos _ (h.coprime_of_coprime hc) h1.2.2.2
· show w = _
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← Rat.divInt_mul_right (by norm_num : (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0)]
rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.1, Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.2.1, hw2]
norm_cast
· apply (mul_lt_mul_right (by norm_num : 0 < (2 : ℤ))).mp
rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.1, zero_mul]
exact hm2n2
rw [h2.1, h1.2.2.1] at hyo
revert hyo
norm_num
#align pythagorean_triple.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos PythagoreanTriple.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z) :
h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
cases' h.even_odd_of_coprime hc with h1 h2
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos hc h1.right hzpos
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at hc
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := h.symm.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos hc h2.left hzpos
use m, n; tauto
#align pythagorean_triple.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_pos PythagoreanTriple.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
by_cases hz : 0 < z
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos hc hz
have h' : PythagoreanTriple x y (-z) := by simpa [PythagoreanTriple, neg_mul_neg] using h.eq
apply h'.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos hc
apply lt_of_le_of_ne _ (h'.ne_zero_of_coprime hc).symm
exact le_neg.mp (not_lt.mp hz)
#align pythagorean_triple.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime PythagoreanTriple.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime
theorem classified : h.IsClassified := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
use 0, 1, 0
field_simp [hx, hy]
apply h.isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified
apply h.normalize.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime
apply Int.gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
#align pythagorean_triple.classified PythagoreanTriple.classified
theorem coprime_classification :
PythagoreanTriple x y z ∧ Int.gcd x y = 1 ↔
∃ m n,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
(z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∨ z = -(m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) := by
clear h -- Porting note: don't want this variable, but can't use `include` / `omit`
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := h.left.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime h.right
use m, n
rcases H with ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co, pp⟩
· refine ⟨Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, co, pp⟩
have : z ^ 2 = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← h.left.eq]
ring
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this
· refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, co, pp⟩
have : z ^ 2 = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← h.left.eq]
ring
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this
· delta PythagoreanTriple
rintro ⟨m, n, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl | rfl, co, pp⟩ <;>
first
| constructor; ring; exact coprime_sq_sub_mul co pp
| constructor; ring; rw [Int.gcd_comm]; exact coprime_sq_sub_mul co pp
#align pythagorean_triple.coprime_classification PythagoreanTriple.coprime_classification
/-- by assuming `x` is odd and `z` is positive we get a slightly more precise classification of
the Pythagorean triple `x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = z ^ 2`-/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PythagoreanTriples.lean | 629 | 677 | theorem coprime_classification' {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
(h_coprime : Int.gcd x y = 1) (h_parity : x % 2 = 1) (h_pos : 0 < z) :
∃ m n,
x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
y = 2 * m * n ∧
z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) ∧ 0 ≤ m := by |
obtain ⟨m, n, ht1, ht2, ht3, ht4⟩ :=
PythagoreanTriple.coprime_classification.mp (And.intro h h_coprime)
rcases le_or_lt 0 m with hm | hm
· use m, n
cases' ht1 with h_odd h_even
· apply And.intro h_odd.1
apply And.intro h_odd.2
cases' ht2 with h_pos h_neg
· apply And.intro h_pos (And.intro ht3 (And.intro ht4 hm))
· exfalso
revert h_pos
rw [h_neg]
exact imp_false.mpr (not_lt.mpr (neg_nonpos.mpr (add_nonneg (sq_nonneg m) (sq_nonneg n))))
exfalso
rcases h_even with ⟨rfl, -⟩
rw [mul_assoc, Int.mul_emod_right] at h_parity
exact zero_ne_one h_parity
· use -m, -n
cases' ht1 with h_odd h_even
· rw [neg_sq m]
rw [neg_sq n]
apply And.intro h_odd.1
constructor
· rw [h_odd.2]
ring
cases' ht2 with h_pos h_neg
· apply And.intro h_pos
constructor
· delta Int.gcd
rw [Int.natAbs_neg, Int.natAbs_neg]
exact ht3
· rw [Int.neg_emod_two, Int.neg_emod_two]
apply And.intro ht4
linarith
· exfalso
revert h_pos
rw [h_neg]
exact imp_false.mpr (not_lt.mpr (neg_nonpos.mpr (add_nonneg (sq_nonneg m) (sq_nonneg n))))
exfalso
rcases h_even with ⟨rfl, -⟩
rw [mul_assoc, Int.mul_emod_right] at h_parity
exact zero_ne_one h_parity
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Alex Keizer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
/-!
This file establishes a `snoc : Vector α n → α → Vector α (n+1)` operation, that appends a single
element to the back of a vector.
It provides a collection of lemmas that show how different `Vector` operations reduce when their
argument is `snoc xs x`.
Also, an alternative, reverse, induction principle is added, that breaks down a vector into
`snoc xs x` for its inductive case. Effectively doing induction from right-to-left
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Vector
/-- Append a single element to the end of a vector -/
def snoc : Vector α n → α → Vector α (n+1) :=
fun xs x => append xs (x ::ᵥ Vector.nil)
/-!
## Simplification lemmas
-/
section Simp
variable (xs : Vector α n)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_cons : (x ::ᵥ xs).snoc y = x ::ᵥ (xs.snoc y) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snoc_nil : (nil.snoc x) = x ::ᵥ nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_cons : reverse (x ::ᵥ xs) = (reverse xs).snoc x := by
cases xs
simp only [reverse, cons, toList_mk, List.reverse_cons, snoc]
congr
@[simp]
theorem reverse_snoc : reverse (xs.snoc x) = x ::ᵥ (reverse xs) := by
cases xs
simp only [reverse, snoc, cons, toList_mk]
congr
simp [toList, Vector.append, Append.append]
theorem replicate_succ_to_snoc (val : α) :
replicate (n+1) val = (replicate n val).snoc val := by
clear xs
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih =>
rw [replicate_succ]
conv => rhs; rw [replicate_succ]
rw [snoc_cons, ih]
end Simp
/-!
## Reverse induction principle
-/
section Induction
/-- Define `C v` by *reverse* induction on `v : Vector α n`.
That is, break the vector down starting from the right-most element, using `snoc`
This function has two arguments: `nil` handles the base case on `C nil`,
and `snoc` defines the inductive step using `∀ x : α, C xs → C (xs.snoc x)`.
This can be used as `induction v using Vector.revInductionOn`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def revInductionOn {C : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Vector α n → Sort*} {n : ℕ} (v : Vector α n)
(nil : C nil)
(snoc : ∀ {n : ℕ} (xs : Vector α n) (x : α), C xs → C (xs.snoc x)) :
C v :=
cast (by simp) <| inductionOn
(C := fun v => C v.reverse)
v.reverse
nil
(@fun n x xs (r : C xs.reverse) => cast (by simp) <| snoc xs.reverse x r)
/-- Define `C v w` by *reverse* induction on a pair of vectors `v : Vector α n` and
`w : Vector β n`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def revInductionOn₂ {C : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Vector α n → Vector β n → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(v : Vector α n) (w : Vector β n)
(nil : C nil nil)
(snoc : ∀ {n : ℕ} (xs : Vector α n) (ys : Vector β n) (x : α) (y : β),
C xs ys → C (xs.snoc x) (ys.snoc y)) :
C v w :=
cast (by simp) <| inductionOn₂
(C := fun v w => C v.reverse w.reverse)
v.reverse
w.reverse
nil
(@fun n x y xs ys (r : C xs.reverse ys.reverse) =>
cast (by simp) <| snoc xs.reverse ys.reverse x y r)
/-- Define `C v` by *reverse* case analysis, i.e. by handling the cases `nil` and `xs.snoc x`
separately -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def revCasesOn {C : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Vector α n → Sort*} {n : ℕ} (v : Vector α n)
(nil : C nil)
(snoc : ∀ {n : ℕ} (xs : Vector α n) (x : α), C (xs.snoc x)) :
C v :=
revInductionOn v nil fun xs x _ => snoc xs x
end Induction
/-!
## More simplification lemmas
-/
section Simp
variable (xs : Vector α n)
@[simp]
theorem map_snoc : map f (xs.snoc x) = (map f xs).snoc (f x) := by
induction xs <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr_nil : mapAccumr f Vector.nil s = (s, Vector.nil) :=
rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Snoc.lean | 134 | 141 | theorem mapAccumr_snoc :
mapAccumr f (xs.snoc x) s
= let q := f x s
let r := mapAccumr f xs q.1
(r.1, r.2.snoc q.2) := by |
induction xs
· rfl
· simp [*]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
#align_import data.fin.vec_notation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2445c98ae4b87eabebdde552593519b9b6dc350c"
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file defines notation for vectors and matrices. Given `a b c d : α`,
the notation allows us to write `![a, b, c, d] : Fin 4 → α`.
Nesting vectors gives coefficients of a matrix, so `![![a, b], ![c, d]] : Fin 2 → Fin 2 → α`.
In later files we introduce `!![a, b; c, d]` as notation for `Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
## Main definitions
* `vecEmpty` is the empty vector (or `0` by `n` matrix) `![]`
* `vecCons` prepends an entry to a vector, so `![a, b]` is `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
The main new notation is `![a, b]`, which gets expanded to `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `test/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
section MatrixNotation
/-- `![]` is the vector with no entries. -/
def vecEmpty : Fin 0 → α :=
Fin.elim0
#align matrix.vec_empty Matrix.vecEmpty
/-- `vecCons h t` prepends an entry `h` to a vector `t`.
The inverse functions are `vecHead` and `vecTail`.
The notation `![a, b, ...]` expands to `vecCons a (vecCons b ...)`.
-/
def vecCons {n : ℕ} (h : α) (t : Fin n → α) : Fin n.succ → α :=
Fin.cons h t
#align matrix.vec_cons Matrix.vecCons
/-- `![...]` notation is used to construct a vector `Fin n → α` using `Matrix.vecEmpty` and
`Matrix.vecCons`.
For instance, `![a, b, c] : Fin 3` is syntax for `vecCons a (vecCons b (vecCons c vecEmpty))`.
Note that this should not be used as syntax for `Matrix` as it generates a term with the wrong type.
The `!![a, b; c, d]` syntax (provided by `Matrix.matrixNotation`) should be used instead.
-/
syntax (name := vecNotation) "![" term,* "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(![$term:term, $terms:term,*]) => `(vecCons $term ![$terms,*])
| `(![$term:term]) => `(vecCons $term ![])
| `(![]) => `(vecEmpty)
/-- Unexpander for the `![x, y, ...]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecCons]
def vecConsUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_ $term ![$term2, $terms,*]) => `(![$term, $term2, $terms,*])
| `($_ $term ![$term2]) => `(![$term, $term2])
| `($_ $term ![]) => `(![$term])
| _ => throw ()
/-- Unexpander for the `![]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecEmpty]
def vecEmptyUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_:ident) => `(![])
| _ => throw ()
/-- `vecHead v` gives the first entry of the vector `v` -/
def vecHead {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : α :=
v 0
#align matrix.vec_head Matrix.vecHead
/-- `vecTail v` gives a vector consisting of all entries of `v` except the first -/
def vecTail {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : Fin n → α :=
v ∘ Fin.succ
#align matrix.vec_tail Matrix.vecTail
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a vector `Fin n → α`, for example:
```
#eval ![1, 2] + ![3, 4] -- ![4, 6]
```
-/
instance _root_.PiFin.hasRepr [Repr α] : Repr (Fin n → α) where
reprPrec f _ :=
Std.Format.bracket "![" (Std.Format.joinSep
((List.finRange n).map fun n => repr (f n)) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
#align pi_fin.has_repr PiFin.hasRepr
end MatrixNotation
variable {m n o : ℕ} {m' n' o' : Type*}
theorem empty_eq (v : Fin 0 → α) : v = ![] :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.empty_eq Matrix.empty_eq
section Val
@[simp]
theorem head_fin_const (a : α) : (vecHead fun _ : Fin (n + 1) => a) = a :=
rfl
#align matrix.head_fin_const Matrix.head_fin_const
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_zero (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u 0 = x :=
rfl
#align matrix.cons_val_zero Matrix.cons_val_zero
theorem cons_val_zero' (h : 0 < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u ⟨0, h⟩ = x :=
rfl
#align matrix.cons_val_zero' Matrix.cons_val_zero'
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) (i : Fin m) : vecCons x u i.succ = u i := by
simp [vecCons]
#align matrix.cons_val_succ Matrix.cons_val_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ' {i : ℕ} (h : i.succ < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
vecCons x u ⟨i.succ, h⟩ = u ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ := by
simp only [vecCons, Fin.cons, Fin.cases_succ']
#align matrix.cons_val_succ' Matrix.cons_val_succ'
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecHead (vecCons x u) = x :=
rfl
#align matrix.head_cons Matrix.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecTail (vecCons x u) = u := by
ext
simp [vecTail]
#align matrix.tail_cons Matrix.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem empty_val' {n' : Type*} (j : n') : (fun i => (![] : Fin 0 → n' → α) i j) = ![] :=
empty_eq _
#align matrix.empty_val' Matrix.empty_val'
@[simp]
theorem cons_head_tail (u : Fin m.succ → α) : vecCons (vecHead u) (vecTail u) = u :=
Fin.cons_self_tail _
#align matrix.cons_head_tail Matrix.cons_head_tail
@[simp]
theorem range_cons (x : α) (u : Fin n → α) : Set.range (vecCons x u) = {x} ∪ Set.range u :=
Set.ext fun y => by simp [Fin.exists_fin_succ, eq_comm]
#align matrix.range_cons Matrix.range_cons
@[simp]
theorem range_empty (u : Fin 0 → α) : Set.range u = ∅ :=
Set.range_eq_empty _
#align matrix.range_empty Matrix.range_empty
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem range_cons_empty (x : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) : Set.range (Matrix.vecCons x u) = {x} := by
rw [range_cons, range_empty, Set.union_empty]
#align matrix.range_cons_empty Matrix.range_cons_empty
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this (up to commutativity)
theorem range_cons_cons_empty (x y : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) :
Set.range (vecCons x <| vecCons y u) = {x, y} := by
rw [range_cons, range_cons_empty, Set.singleton_union]
#align matrix.range_cons_cons_empty Matrix.range_cons_cons_empty
@[simp]
theorem vecCons_const (a : α) : (vecCons a fun _ : Fin n => a) = fun _ => a :=
funext <| Fin.forall_fin_succ.2 ⟨rfl, cons_val_succ _ _⟩
#align matrix.vec_cons_const Matrix.vecCons_const
theorem vec_single_eq_const (a : α) : ![a] = fun _ => a :=
let _ : Unique (Fin 1) := inferInstance
funext <| Unique.forall_iff.2 rfl
#align matrix.vec_single_eq_const Matrix.vec_single_eq_const
/-- `![a, b, ...] 1` is equal to `b`.
The simplifier needs a special lemma for length `≥ 2`, in addition to
`cons_val_succ`, because `1 : Fin 1 = 0 : Fin 1`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_one (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ → α) : vecCons x u 1 = vecHead u :=
rfl
#align matrix.cons_val_one Matrix.cons_val_one
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_two (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ → α) : vecCons x u 2 = vecHead (vecTail u) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma cons_val_three (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ.succ → α) :
vecCons x u 3 = vecHead (vecTail (vecTail u)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma cons_val_four (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ.succ.succ → α) :
vecCons x u 4 = vecHead (vecTail (vecTail (vecTail u))) :=
rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/VecNotation.lean | 228 | 230 | theorem cons_val_fin_one (x : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) : ∀ (i : Fin 1), vecCons x u i = x := by |
rw [Fin.forall_fin_one]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import algebra.big_operators.finprod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open scoped Classical
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
#align finsum finsum
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
#align finprod finprod
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x`-/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x`-/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
#align finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mul_support_to_finset_subset finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset
#align finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_to_finset_subset finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_toFinset_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
#align finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mul_support_subset finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset
#align finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
#align finprod_one finprod_one
#align finsum_zero finsum_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finprod_of_is_empty finprod_of_isEmpty
#align finsum_of_is_empty finsum_of_isEmpty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
#align finprod_false finprod_false
#align finsum_false finsum_false
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
#align finprod_eq_single finprod_eq_single
#align finsum_eq_single finsum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
#align finprod_unique finprod_unique
#align finsum_unique finsum_unique
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
#align finprod_true finprod_true
#align finsum_true finsum_true
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
#align finprod_eq_dif finprod_eq_dif
#align finsum_eq_dif finsum_eq_dif
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
#align finprod_eq_if finprod_eq_if
#align finsum_eq_if finsum_eq_if
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align finprod_congr finprod_congr
#align finsum_congr finsum_congr
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
#align finprod_congr_Prop finprod_congr_Prop
#align finsum_congr_Prop finsum_congr_Prop
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
#align finprod_induction finprod_induction
#align finsum_induction finsum_induction
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [OrderedCommSemiring R] {f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
#align finprod_nonneg finprod_nonneg
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [OrderedCommMonoid M] {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
#align one_le_finprod' one_le_finprod'
#align finsum_nonneg finsum_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_plift MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_plift AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_plift
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_Prop MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_Prop AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_Prop
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_of_preimage_zero AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_of_preimage_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_of_injective MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_of_injective AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_of_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
#align mul_equiv.map_finprod MulEquiv.map_finprod
#align add_equiv.map_finsum AddEquiv.map_finsum
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
#align finsum_smul finsum_smul
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 340 | 344 | theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by |
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Hall.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
#align_import combinatorics.configuration from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d2d8742b0c21426362a9dacebc6005db895ca963"
/-!
# Configurations of Points and lines
This file introduces abstract configurations of points and lines, and proves some basic properties.
## Main definitions
* `Configuration.Nondegenerate`: Excludes certain degenerate configurations,
and imposes uniqueness of intersection points.
* `Configuration.HasPoints`: A nondegenerate configuration in which
every pair of lines has an intersection point.
* `Configuration.HasLines`: A nondegenerate configuration in which
every pair of points has a line through them.
* `Configuration.lineCount`: The number of lines through a given point.
* `Configuration.pointCount`: The number of lines through a given line.
## Main statements
* `Configuration.HasLines.card_le`: `HasLines` implies `|P| ≤ |L|`.
* `Configuration.HasPoints.card_le`: `HasPoints` implies `|L| ≤ |P|`.
* `Configuration.HasLines.hasPoints`: `HasLines` and `|P| = |L|` implies `HasPoints`.
* `Configuration.HasPoints.hasLines`: `HasPoints` and `|P| = |L|` implies `HasLines`.
Together, these four statements say that any two of the following properties imply the third:
(a) `HasLines`, (b) `HasPoints`, (c) `|P| = |L|`.
-/
open Finset
namespace Configuration
variable (P L : Type*) [Membership P L]
/-- A type synonym. -/
def Dual :=
P
#align configuration.dual Configuration.Dual
-- Porting note: was `this` instead of `h`
instance [h : Inhabited P] : Inhabited (Dual P) :=
h
instance [Finite P] : Finite (Dual P) :=
‹Finite P›
-- Porting note: was `this` instead of `h`
instance [h : Fintype P] : Fintype (Dual P) :=
h
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: figure out if this is needed.
set_option synthInstance.checkSynthOrder false in
instance : Membership (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
⟨Function.swap (Membership.mem : P → L → Prop)⟩
/-- A configuration is nondegenerate if:
1) there does not exist a line that passes through all of the points,
2) there does not exist a point that is on all of the lines,
3) there is at most one line through any two points,
4) any two lines have at most one intersection point.
Conditions 3 and 4 are equivalent. -/
class Nondegenerate : Prop where
exists_point : ∀ l : L, ∃ p, p ∉ l
exists_line : ∀ p, ∃ l : L, p ∉ l
eq_or_eq : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P} {l₁ l₂ : L}, p₁ ∈ l₁ → p₂ ∈ l₁ → p₁ ∈ l₂ → p₂ ∈ l₂ → p₁ = p₂ ∨ l₁ = l₂
#align configuration.nondegenerate Configuration.Nondegenerate
/-- A nondegenerate configuration in which every pair of lines has an intersection point. -/
class HasPoints extends Nondegenerate P L where
mkPoint : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : L}, l₁ ≠ l₂ → P
mkPoint_ax : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : L} (h : l₁ ≠ l₂), mkPoint h ∈ l₁ ∧ mkPoint h ∈ l₂
#align configuration.has_points Configuration.HasPoints
/-- A nondegenerate configuration in which every pair of points has a line through them. -/
class HasLines extends Nondegenerate P L where
mkLine : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P}, p₁ ≠ p₂ → L
mkLine_ax : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂), p₁ ∈ mkLine h ∧ p₂ ∈ mkLine h
#align configuration.has_lines Configuration.HasLines
open Nondegenerate
open HasPoints (mkPoint mkPoint_ax)
open HasLines (mkLine mkLine_ax)
instance Dual.Nondegenerate [Nondegenerate P L] : Nondegenerate (Dual L) (Dual P) where
exists_point := @exists_line P L _ _
exists_line := @exists_point P L _ _
eq_or_eq := @fun l₁ l₂ p₁ p₂ h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ => (@eq_or_eq P L _ _ p₁ p₂ l₁ l₂ h₁ h₃ h₂ h₄).symm
instance Dual.hasLines [HasPoints P L] : HasLines (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
{ Dual.Nondegenerate _ _ with
mkLine := @mkPoint P L _ _
mkLine_ax := @mkPoint_ax P L _ _ }
instance Dual.hasPoints [HasLines P L] : HasPoints (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
{ Dual.Nondegenerate _ _ with
mkPoint := @mkLine P L _ _
mkPoint_ax := @mkLine_ax P L _ _ }
theorem HasPoints.existsUnique_point [HasPoints P L] (l₁ l₂ : L) (hl : l₁ ≠ l₂) :
∃! p, p ∈ l₁ ∧ p ∈ l₂ :=
⟨mkPoint hl, mkPoint_ax hl, fun _ hp =>
(eq_or_eq hp.1 (mkPoint_ax hl).1 hp.2 (mkPoint_ax hl).2).resolve_right hl⟩
#align configuration.has_points.exists_unique_point Configuration.HasPoints.existsUnique_point
theorem HasLines.existsUnique_line [HasLines P L] (p₁ p₂ : P) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∃! l : L, p₁ ∈ l ∧ p₂ ∈ l :=
HasPoints.existsUnique_point (Dual L) (Dual P) p₁ p₂ hp
#align configuration.has_lines.exists_unique_line Configuration.HasLines.existsUnique_line
variable {P L}
/-- If a nondegenerate configuration has at least as many points as lines, then there exists
an injective function `f` from lines to points, such that `f l` does not lie on `l`. -/
theorem Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le [Nondegenerate P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L]
(h : Fintype.card L ≤ Fintype.card P) : ∃ f : L → P, Function.Injective f ∧ ∀ l, f l ∉ l := by
classical
let t : L → Finset P := fun l => Set.toFinset { p | p ∉ l }
suffices ∀ s : Finset L, s.card ≤ (s.biUnion t).card by
-- Hall's marriage theorem
obtain ⟨f, hf1, hf2⟩ := (Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective t).mp this
exact ⟨f, hf1, fun l => Set.mem_toFinset.mp (hf2 l)⟩
intro s
by_cases hs₀ : s.card = 0
-- If `s = ∅`, then `s.card = 0 ≤ (s.bUnion t).card`
· simp_rw [hs₀, zero_le]
by_cases hs₁ : s.card = 1
-- If `s = {l}`, then pick a point `p ∉ l`
· obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := Finset.card_eq_one.mp hs₁
obtain ⟨p, hl⟩ := exists_point l
rw [Finset.card_singleton, Finset.singleton_biUnion, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
exact Finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem (Set.mem_toFinset.mpr hl)
suffices (s.biUnion t)ᶜ.card ≤ sᶜ.card by
-- Rephrase in terms of complements (uses `h`)
rw [Finset.card_compl, Finset.card_compl, tsub_le_iff_left] at this
replace := h.trans this
rwa [← add_tsub_assoc_of_le s.card_le_univ, le_tsub_iff_left (le_add_left s.card_le_univ),
add_le_add_iff_right] at this
have hs₂ : (s.biUnion t)ᶜ.card ≤ 1 := by
-- At most one line through two points of `s`
refine Finset.card_le_one_iff.mpr @fun p₁ p₂ hp₁ hp₂ => ?_
simp_rw [t, Finset.mem_compl, Finset.mem_biUnion, not_exists, not_and,
Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Classical.not_not] at hp₁ hp₂
obtain ⟨l₁, l₂, hl₁, hl₂, hl₃⟩ :=
Finset.one_lt_card_iff.mp (Nat.one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨hs₀, hs₁⟩)
exact (eq_or_eq (hp₁ l₁ hl₁) (hp₂ l₁ hl₁) (hp₁ l₂ hl₂) (hp₂ l₂ hl₂)).resolve_right hl₃
by_cases hs₃ : sᶜ.card = 0
· rw [hs₃, Nat.le_zero]
rw [Finset.card_compl, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, LE.le.le_iff_eq (Finset.card_le_univ _), eq_comm,
Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ] at hs₃ ⊢
rw [hs₃]
rw [Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall] at hs₃ ⊢
exact fun p =>
Exists.elim (exists_line p)-- If `s = univ`, then show `s.bUnion t = univ`
fun l hl => Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨l, Finset.mem_univ l, Set.mem_toFinset.mpr hl⟩
· exact hs₂.trans (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hs₃)
#align configuration.nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le Configuration.Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le
-- If `s < univ`, then consequence of `hs₂`
variable (L)
/-- Number of points on a given line. -/
noncomputable def lineCount (p : P) : ℕ :=
Nat.card { l : L // p ∈ l }
#align configuration.line_count Configuration.lineCount
variable (P) {L}
/-- Number of lines through a given point. -/
noncomputable def pointCount (l : L) : ℕ :=
Nat.card { p : P // p ∈ l }
#align configuration.point_count Configuration.pointCount
variable (L)
theorem sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount [Fintype P] [Fintype L] :
∑ p : P, lineCount L p = ∑ l : L, pointCount P l := by
classical
simp only [lineCount, pointCount, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Fintype.card_sigma]
apply Fintype.card_congr
calc
(Σp, { l : L // p ∈ l }) ≃ { x : P × L // x.1 ∈ x.2 } :=
(Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype (· ∈ ·)).symm
_ ≃ { x : L × P // x.2 ∈ x.1 } := (Equiv.prodComm P L).subtypeEquiv fun x => Iff.rfl
_ ≃ Σl, { p // p ∈ l } := Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype fun (l : L) (p : P) => p ∈ l
#align configuration.sum_line_count_eq_sum_point_count Configuration.sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount
variable {P L}
theorem HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount [HasLines P L] {p : P} {l : L} (h : p ∉ l)
[Finite { l : L // p ∈ l }] : pointCount P l ≤ lineCount L p := by
by_cases hf : Infinite { p : P // p ∈ l }
· exact (le_of_eq Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite).trans (zero_le (lineCount L p))
haveI := fintypeOfNotInfinite hf
cases nonempty_fintype { l : L // p ∈ l }
rw [lineCount, pointCount, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
have : ∀ p' : { p // p ∈ l }, p ≠ p' := fun p' hp' => h ((congr_arg (· ∈ l) hp').mpr p'.2)
exact
Fintype.card_le_of_injective (fun p' => ⟨mkLine (this p'), (mkLine_ax (this p')).1⟩)
fun p₁ p₂ hp =>
Subtype.ext
((eq_or_eq p₁.2 p₂.2 (mkLine_ax (this p₁)).2
((congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext_iff.mp hp)).mpr (mkLine_ax (this p₂)).2)).resolve_right
fun h' => (congr_arg (¬p ∈ ·) h').mp h (mkLine_ax (this p₁)).1)
#align configuration.has_lines.point_count_le_line_count Configuration.HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount
theorem HasPoints.lineCount_le_pointCount [HasPoints P L] {p : P} {l : L} (h : p ∉ l)
[hf : Finite { p : P // p ∈ l }] : lineCount L p ≤ pointCount P l :=
@HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount (Dual L) (Dual P) _ _ l p h hf
#align configuration.has_points.line_count_le_point_count Configuration.HasPoints.lineCount_le_pointCount
variable (P L)
/-- If a nondegenerate configuration has a unique line through any two points, then `|P| ≤ |L|`. -/
theorem HasLines.card_le [HasLines P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L] :
Fintype.card P ≤ Fintype.card L := by
classical
by_contra hc₂
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ := Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le (le_of_not_le hc₂)
have :=
calc
∑ p, lineCount L p = ∑ l, pointCount P l := sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount P L
_ ≤ ∑ l, lineCount L (f l) :=
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun l _ => HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount (hf₂ l))
_ = ∑ p ∈ univ.map ⟨f, hf₁⟩, lineCount L p := by rw [sum_map]; dsimp
_ < ∑ p, lineCount L p := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := not_forall.mp (mt (Fintype.card_le_of_surjective f) hc₂)
refine sum_lt_sum_of_subset (subset_univ _) (mem_univ p) ?_ ?_ fun p _ _ ↦ zero_le _
· simpa only [Finset.mem_map, exists_prop, Finset.mem_univ, true_and_iff]
· rw [lineCount, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_pos_iff]
obtain ⟨l, _⟩ := @exists_line P L _ _ p
exact
let this := not_exists.mp hp l
⟨⟨mkLine this, (mkLine_ax this).2⟩⟩
exact lt_irrefl _ this
#align configuration.has_lines.card_le Configuration.HasLines.card_le
/-- If a nondegenerate configuration has a unique point on any two lines, then `|L| ≤ |P|`. -/
theorem HasPoints.card_le [HasPoints P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L] :
Fintype.card L ≤ Fintype.card P :=
@HasLines.card_le (Dual L) (Dual P) _ _ _ _
#align configuration.has_points.card_le Configuration.HasPoints.card_le
variable {P L}
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Configuration.lean | 256 | 263 | theorem HasLines.exists_bijective_of_card_eq [HasLines P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L]
(h : Fintype.card P = Fintype.card L) :
∃ f : L → P, Function.Bijective f ∧ ∀ l, pointCount P l = lineCount L (f l) := by |
classical
obtain ⟨f, hf1, hf2⟩ := Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le (ge_of_eq h)
have hf3 := (Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card f).mpr ⟨hf1, h.symm⟩
exact ⟨f, hf3, fun l ↦ (sum_eq_sum_iff_of_le fun l _ ↦ pointCount_le_lineCount (hf2 l)).1
((hf3.sum_comp _).trans (sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount P L)).symm _ <| mem_univ _⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import data.set.intervals.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder `α`, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open, or
closed) using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side. For instance,
`Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
This file contains these definitions, and basic facts on inclusion, intersection, difference of
intervals (where the precise statements may depend on the properties of the order, in particular
for some statements it should be `LinearOrder` or `DenselyOrdered`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
/-- Left-open right-open interval -/
def Ioo (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ioo Set.Ioo
/-- Left-closed right-open interval -/
def Ico (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ico Set.Ico
/-- Left-infinite right-open interval -/
def Iio (a : α) :=
{ x | x < a }
#align set.Iio Set.Iio
/-- Left-closed right-closed interval -/
def Icc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Icc Set.Icc
/-- Left-infinite right-closed interval -/
def Iic (b : α) :=
{ x | x ≤ b }
#align set.Iic Set.Iic
/-- Left-open right-closed interval -/
def Ioc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Ioc Set.Ioc
/-- Left-closed right-infinite interval -/
def Ici (a : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x }
#align set.Ici Set.Ici
/-- Left-open right-infinite interval -/
def Ioi (a : α) :=
{ x | a < x }
#align set.Ioi Set.Ioi
theorem Ioo_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x < b } = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioo_def Set.Ioo_def
theorem Ico_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b } = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ico_def Set.Ico_def
theorem Iio_def (a : α) : { x | x < a } = Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.Iio_def Set.Iio_def
theorem Icc_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b } = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Icc_def Set.Icc_def
theorem Iic_def (b : α) : { x | x ≤ b } = Iic b :=
rfl
#align set.Iic_def Set.Iic_def
theorem Ioc_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b } = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioc_def Set.Ioc_def
theorem Ici_def (a : α) : { x | a ≤ x } = Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_def Set.Ici_def
theorem Ioi_def (a : α) : { x | a < x } = Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_def Set.Ioi_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioo Set.mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ico Set.mem_Ico
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iio Set.mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Icc Set.mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iic Set.mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioc Set.mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ici Set.mem_Ici
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioi Set.mem_Ioi
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioo Set.decidableMemIoo
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ico Set.decidableMemIco
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iio Set.decidableMemIio
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Icc Set.decidableMemIcc
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iic Set.decidableMemIic
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioc Set.decidableMemIoc
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ici Set.decidableMemIci
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioi Set.decidableMemIoi
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioo Set.left_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Ico Set.left_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Icc Set.left_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioc Set.left_mem_Ioc
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
#align set.left_mem_Ici Set.left_mem_Ici
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioo Set.right_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ico Set.right_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Icc Set.right_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioc Set.right_mem_Ioc
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
#align set.right_mem_Iic Set.right_mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ici : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Ici Set.dual_Ici
@[simp]
theorem dual_Iic : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Iic Set.dual_Iic
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioi : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Ioi Set.dual_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem dual_Iio : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Iio Set.dual_Iio
@[simp]
theorem dual_Icc : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Icc Set.dual_Icc
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioc : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ioc Set.dual_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ico : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ico Set.dual_Ico
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioo : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ioo Set.dual_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Icc Set.nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ico Set.nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ioc Set.nonempty_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ici Set.nonempty_Ici
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
#align set.nonempty_Iic Set.nonempty_Iic
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ioo Set.nonempty_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
#align set.nonempty_Ioi Set.nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
#align set.nonempty_Iio Set.nonempty_Iio
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Icc_subtype Set.nonempty_Icc_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ico_subtype Set.nonempty_Ico_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ioc_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioc_subtype
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
#align set.nonempty_Ici_subtype Set.nonempty_Ici_subtype
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
#align set.nonempty_Iic_subtype Set.nonempty_Iic_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ioo_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioo_subtype
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
#align set.nonempty_Ioi_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioi_subtype
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
#align set.nonempty_Iio_subtype Set.nonempty_Iio_subtype
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
#align set.Icc_eq_empty Set.Icc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
#align set.Ico_eq_empty Set.Ico_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty Set.Ioc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty Set.Ioo_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
#align set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt Set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ico_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ico_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ico_self Set.Ico_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ioc_self Set.Ioc_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ioo_self Set.Ioo_self
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
#align set.Ici_subset_Ici Set.Ici_subset_Ici
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align set.Iic_subset_Iic Set.Iic_subset_Iic
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
#align set.Ici_subset_Ioi Set.Ici_subset_Ioi
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
#align set.Iic_subset_Iio Set.Iic_subset_Iio
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico Set.Ico_subset_Ico
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_left Set.Ico_subset_Ico_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_right Set.Ico_subset_Ico_right
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc Set.Icc_subset_Icc
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_left Set.Icc_subset_Icc_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_right Set.Icc_subset_Icc_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioo Set.Icc_subset_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Icc_subset_Ici_self Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Icc_subset_Iic_self Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
#align set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
#align set.Icc_subset_Ico_right Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
#align set.Ico_subset_Icc_self Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
#align set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self Set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ico_subset_Iio_self Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic_self Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ico_subset_Ici_self Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
#align set.Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
#align set.Iio_ssubset_Iic_self Set.Iio_ssubset_Iic_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff Set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Iic_iff Set.Icc_subset_Iic_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ici_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ici_iff
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
#align set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
#align set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ioi Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici Set.Ioi_subset_Ici
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
#align set.Iio_subset_Iio Set.Iio_subset_Iio
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic Set.Iio_subset_Iic
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_inter_Iic Set.Ici_inter_Iic
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_inter_Iio Set.Ici_inter_Iio
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_inter_Iic Set.Ioi_inter_Iic
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_inter_Iio Set.Ioi_inter_Iio
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iic_inter_Ici Set.Iic_inter_Ici
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iio_inter_Ici Set.Iio_inter_Ici
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iic_inter_Ioi Set.Iic_inter_Ioi
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iio_inter_Ioi Set.Iio_inter_Ioi
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
#align set.mem_Ico_of_Ioo Set.mem_Ico_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
#align set.mem_Ioc_of_Ioo Set.mem_Ioc_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ico Set.mem_Icc_of_Ico
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ioc Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioc
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
#align set.mem_Ici_of_Ioi Set.mem_Ici_of_Ioi
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
#align set.mem_Iic_of_Iio Set.mem_Iic_of_Iio
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
#align set.Icc_eq_empty_iff Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
#align set.Ico_eq_empty_iff Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
#align is_top.Iic_eq IsTop.Iic_eq
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
#align is_bot.Ici_eq IsBot.Ici_eq
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ioi a = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => h.not_lt
#align is_max.Ioi_eq IsMax.Ioi_eq
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iio a = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => h.not_lt
#align is_min.Iio_eq IsMin.Iio_eq
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
#align set.Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le Set.Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
#align set.not_mem_Icc_of_lt Set.not_mem_Icc_of_lt
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
#align set.not_mem_Icc_of_gt Set.not_mem_Icc_of_gt
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
#align set.not_mem_Ico_of_lt Set.not_mem_Ico_of_lt
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
#align set.not_mem_Ioc_of_gt Set.not_mem_Ioc_of_gt
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
#align set.not_mem_Ioi_self Set.not_mem_Ioi_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
#align set.not_mem_Iio_self Set.not_mem_Iio_self
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
#align set.not_mem_Ioc_of_le Set.not_mem_Ioc_of_le
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
#align set.not_mem_Ico_of_ge Set.not_mem_Ico_of_ge
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
#align set.not_mem_Ioo_of_le Set.not_mem_Ioo_of_le
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
#align set.not_mem_Ioo_of_ge Set.not_mem_Ioo_of_ge
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align set.Icc_self Set.Icc_self
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h.subst <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h.subst <| right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
#align set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
#align set.subsingleton_Icc_of_ge Set.subsingleton_Icc_of_ge
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [ge_iff_le, gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
#align set.Icc_diff_left Set.Icc_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
#align set.Icc_diff_right Set.Icc_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
#align set.Ico_diff_left Set.Ico_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
#align set.Ioc_diff_right Set.Ioc_diff_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 825 | 826 | theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by |
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import data.real.irrational from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e7aaccf9b0182576cabdde36cf1b5ad3585b70d"
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `sqrt q` is irrational if and only if
`Rat.sqrt q * Rat.sqrt q ≠ q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
-/
open Rat Real multiplicity
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
#align irrational Irrational
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
#align irrational_iff_ne_rational irrational_iff_ne_rational
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
#align transcendental.irrational Transcendental.irrational
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
#align irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : (multiplicity (p : ℤ) m).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, hm⟩) % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity.one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
erw [multiplicity.pow' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1) (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, this⟩),
Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
#align irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv :
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) m).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, (ne_of_lt hm).symm⟩) % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
#align irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
@irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd p (Int.natCast_pos.2 hp.pos) p ⟨hp⟩ <| by
simp [multiplicity.multiplicity_self
(mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 (mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.not_dvd_one))]
#align nat.prime.irrational_sqrt Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
#align irrational_sqrt_two irrational_sqrt_two
theorem irrational_sqrt_rat_iff (q : ℚ) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ Rat.sqrt q * Rat.sqrt q ≠ q ∧ 0 ≤ q :=
if H1 : Rat.sqrt q * Rat.sqrt q = q then
iff_of_false
(not_not_intro
⟨Rat.sqrt q, by
rw [← H1, cast_mul, sqrt_mul_self (cast_nonneg.2 <| Rat.sqrt_nonneg q), sqrt_eq,
abs_of_nonneg (Rat.sqrt_nonneg q)]⟩)
fun h => h.1 H1
else
if H2 : 0 ≤ q then
iff_of_true
(fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
H1 <|
(exists_mul_self _).1
⟨r, by
rwa [eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (cast_nonneg.2 H2), ← cast_mul,
Rat.cast_inj] at hr
rw [← hr]
exact Real.sqrt_nonneg _⟩)
⟨H1, H2⟩
else
iff_of_false
(not_not_intro
⟨0, by
rw [cast_zero]
exact (sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 <| le_of_not_le H2)).symm⟩)
fun h => H2 h.2
#align irrational_sqrt_rat_iff irrational_sqrt_rat_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ (irrational_sqrt_rat_iff q)
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
#align irrational.ne_rat Irrational.ne_rat
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
#align irrational.ne_int Irrational.ne_int
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
#align irrational.ne_nat Irrational.ne_nat
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
#align irrational.ne_zero Irrational.ne_zero
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
#align irrational.ne_one Irrational.ne_one
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
#align rat.not_irrational Rat.not_irrational
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
#align int.not_irrational Int.not_irrational
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
#align nat.not_irrational Nat.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
#align irrational.add_cases Irrational.add_cases
theorem of_rat_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_rat_add Irrational.of_rat_add
theorem rat_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_rat_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
#align irrational.rat_add Irrational.rat_add
theorem of_add_rat : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_rat_add q
#align irrational.of_add_rat Irrational.of_add_rat
theorem add_rat (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.rat_add q
#align irrational.add_rat Irrational.add_rat
theorem of_int_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_rat_add m
#align irrational.of_int_add Irrational.of_int_add
theorem of_add_int (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_int_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
#align irrational.of_add_int Irrational.of_add_int
theorem int_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.rat_add m
#align irrational.int_add Irrational.int_add
theorem add_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.int_add m
#align irrational.add_int Irrational.add_int
theorem of_nat_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_int_add m
#align irrational.of_nat_add Irrational.of_nat_add
theorem of_add_nat (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_int m
#align irrational.of_add_nat Irrational.of_add_nat
theorem nat_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.int_add m
#align irrational.nat_add Irrational.nat_add
theorem add_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_int m
#align irrational.add_nat Irrational.add_nat
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
#align irrational.of_neg Irrational.of_neg
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
#align irrational.neg Irrational.neg
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_rat (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_rat (-q)
#align irrational.sub_rat Irrational.sub_rat
theorem rat_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.rat_add q
#align irrational.rat_sub Irrational.rat_sub
theorem of_sub_rat (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_rat (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
#align irrational.of_sub_rat Irrational.of_sub_rat
theorem of_rat_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_rat_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
#align irrational.of_rat_sub Irrational.of_rat_sub
theorem sub_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_rat m
#align irrational.sub_int Irrational.sub_int
theorem int_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.rat_sub m
#align irrational.int_sub Irrational.int_sub
theorem of_sub_int (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_rat m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
#align irrational.of_sub_int Irrational.of_sub_int
theorem of_int_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_rat_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
#align irrational.of_int_sub Irrational.of_int_sub
theorem sub_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_int m
#align irrational.sub_nat Irrational.sub_nat
theorem nat_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.int_sub m
#align irrational.nat_sub Irrational.nat_sub
theorem of_sub_nat (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_sub_int m
#align irrational.of_sub_nat Irrational.of_sub_nat
theorem of_nat_sub (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_int_sub m
#align irrational.of_nat_sub Irrational.of_nat_sub
/-!
#### Multiplication by rational numbers
-/
theorem mul_cases : Irrational (x * y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx * ry, cast_mul rx ry⟩
#align irrational.mul_cases Irrational.mul_cases
theorem of_mul_rat (h : Irrational (x * q)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_mul_rat Irrational.of_mul_rat
theorem mul_rat (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * q) :=
of_mul_rat q⁻¹ <| by rwa [mul_assoc, ← cast_mul, mul_inv_cancel hq, cast_one, mul_one]
#align irrational.mul_rat Irrational.mul_rat
theorem of_rat_mul : Irrational (q * x) → Irrational x :=
mul_comm x q ▸ of_mul_rat q
#align irrational.of_rat_mul Irrational.of_rat_mul
theorem rat_mul (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q * x) :=
mul_comm x q ▸ h.mul_rat hq
#align irrational.rat_mul Irrational.rat_mul
theorem of_mul_int (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
of_mul_rat m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
#align irrational.of_mul_int Irrational.of_mul_int
theorem of_int_mul (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
of_rat_mul m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
#align irrational.of_int_mul Irrational.of_int_mul
theorem mul_int (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.mul_rat ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational.mul_int Irrational.mul_int
theorem int_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
mul_comm x m ▸ h.mul_int hm
#align irrational.int_mul Irrational.int_mul
theorem of_mul_nat (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_mul_int m
#align irrational.of_mul_nat Irrational.of_mul_nat
theorem of_nat_mul (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_int_mul m
#align irrational.of_nat_mul Irrational.of_nat_mul
theorem mul_nat (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) :=
h.mul_int <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
#align irrational.mul_nat Irrational.mul_nat
theorem nat_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
h.int_mul <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
#align irrational.nat_mul Irrational.nat_mul
/-!
#### Inverse
-/
theorem of_inv (h : Irrational x⁻¹) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => h <| hq ▸ ⟨q⁻¹, q.cast_inv⟩
#align irrational.of_inv Irrational.of_inv
protected theorem inv (h : Irrational x) : Irrational x⁻¹ :=
of_inv <| by rwa [inv_inv]
#align irrational.inv Irrational.inv
/-!
#### Division
-/
theorem div_cases (h : Irrational (x / y)) : Irrational x ∨ Irrational y :=
h.mul_cases.imp id of_inv
#align irrational.div_cases Irrational.div_cases
theorem of_rat_div (h : Irrational (q / x)) : Irrational x :=
(h.of_rat_mul q).of_inv
#align irrational.of_rat_div Irrational.of_rat_div
theorem of_div_rat (h : Irrational (x / q)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_div_rat Irrational.of_div_rat
theorem rat_div (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q / x) :=
h.inv.rat_mul hq
#align irrational.rat_div Irrational.rat_div
theorem div_rat (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / q) := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← cast_inv]
exact h.mul_rat (inv_ne_zero hq)
#align irrational.div_rat Irrational.div_rat
theorem of_int_div (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m / x)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_left m.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_int_div Irrational.of_int_div
theorem of_div_int (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x / m)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_right m.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_div_int Irrational.of_div_int
theorem int_div (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m / x) :=
h.inv.int_mul hm
#align irrational.int_div Irrational.int_div
theorem div_int (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.div_rat ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational.div_int Irrational.div_int
theorem of_nat_div (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m / x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_int_div m
#align irrational.of_nat_div Irrational.of_nat_div
theorem of_div_nat (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x / m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_div_int m
#align irrational.of_div_nat Irrational.of_div_nat
theorem nat_div (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m / x) :=
h.inv.nat_mul hm
#align irrational.nat_div Irrational.nat_div
theorem div_nat (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / m) :=
h.div_int <| by rwa [Int.natCast_ne_zero]
#align irrational.div_nat Irrational.div_nat
theorem of_one_div (h : Irrational (1 / x)) : Irrational x :=
of_rat_div 1 <| by rwa [cast_one]
#align irrational.of_one_div Irrational.of_one_div
/-!
#### Natural and integer power
-/
theorem of_mul_self (h : Irrational (x * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.elim id id
#align irrational.of_mul_self Irrational.of_mul_self
theorem of_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, Irrational (x ^ n) → Irrational x
| 0 => fun h => by
rw [pow_zero] at h
exact (h ⟨1, cast_one⟩).elim
| n + 1 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ] at h
exact h.mul_cases.elim (of_pow n) id
#align irrational.of_pow Irrational.of_pow
open Int in
theorem of_zpow : ∀ m : ℤ, Irrational (x ^ m) → Irrational x
| (n : ℕ) => fun h => by
rw [zpow_natCast] at h
exact h.of_pow _
| -[n+1] => fun h => by
rw [zpow_negSucc] at h
exact h.of_inv.of_pow _
#align irrational.of_zpow Irrational.of_zpow
end Irrational
section Polynomial
open Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable (x : ℝ) (p : ℤ[X])
theorem one_lt_natDegree_of_irrational_root (hx : Irrational x) (p_nonzero : p ≠ 0)
(x_is_root : aeval x p = 0) : 1 < p.natDegree := by
by_contra rid
rcases exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one (not_lt.1 rid) with ⟨a, b, rfl⟩
clear rid
have : (a : ℝ) * x = -b := by simpa [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero] using x_is_root
rcases em (a = 0) with (rfl | ha)
· obtain rfl : b = 0 := by simpa
simp at p_nonzero
· rw [mul_comm, ← eq_div_iff_mul_eq, eq_comm] at this
· refine hx ⟨-b / a, ?_⟩
assumption_mod_cast
· assumption_mod_cast
#align one_lt_nat_degree_of_irrational_root one_lt_natDegree_of_irrational_root
end Polynomial
section
variable {q : ℚ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} {x : ℝ}
open Irrational
/-!
### Simplification lemmas about operations
-/
@[simp]
theorem irrational_rat_add_iff : Irrational (q + x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_rat_add q, rat_add q⟩
#align irrational_rat_add_iff irrational_rat_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_int_add_iff : Irrational (m + x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_int_add m, fun h => h.int_add m⟩
#align irrational_int_add_iff irrational_int_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_nat_add_iff : Irrational (n + x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_nat_add n, fun h => h.nat_add n⟩
#align irrational_nat_add_iff irrational_nat_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_add_rat_iff : Irrational (x + q) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_add_rat q, add_rat q⟩
#align irrational_add_rat_iff irrational_add_rat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_add_int_iff : Irrational (x + m) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_add_int m, fun h => h.add_int m⟩
#align irrational_add_int_iff irrational_add_int_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_add_nat_iff : Irrational (x + n) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_add_nat n, fun h => h.add_nat n⟩
#align irrational_add_nat_iff irrational_add_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_rat_sub_iff : Irrational (q - x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_rat_sub q, rat_sub q⟩
#align irrational_rat_sub_iff irrational_rat_sub_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_int_sub_iff : Irrational (m - x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_int_sub m, fun h => h.int_sub m⟩
#align irrational_int_sub_iff irrational_int_sub_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_nat_sub_iff : Irrational (n - x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_nat_sub n, fun h => h.nat_sub n⟩
#align irrational_nat_sub_iff irrational_nat_sub_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_sub_rat_iff : Irrational (x - q) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_sub_rat q, sub_rat q⟩
#align irrational_sub_rat_iff irrational_sub_rat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_sub_int_iff : Irrational (x - m) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_sub_int m, fun h => h.sub_int m⟩
#align irrational_sub_int_iff irrational_sub_int_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_sub_nat_iff : Irrational (x - n) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_sub_nat n, fun h => h.sub_nat n⟩
#align irrational_sub_nat_iff irrational_sub_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_neg_iff : Irrational (-x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_neg, Irrational.neg⟩
#align irrational_neg_iff irrational_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_inv_iff : Irrational x⁻¹ ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_inv, Irrational.inv⟩
#align irrational_inv_iff irrational_inv_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_rat_mul_iff : Irrational (q * x) ↔ q ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Rat.cast_ne_zero.1 <| left_ne_zero_of_mul h.ne_zero, h.of_rat_mul q⟩, fun h =>
h.2.rat_mul h.1⟩
#align irrational_rat_mul_iff irrational_rat_mul_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_mul_rat_iff : Irrational (x * q) ↔ q ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [mul_comm, irrational_rat_mul_iff]
#align irrational_mul_rat_iff irrational_mul_rat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_int_mul_iff : Irrational (m * x) ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast, irrational_rat_mul_iff, Int.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational_int_mul_iff irrational_int_mul_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_mul_int_iff : Irrational (x * m) ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast, irrational_mul_rat_iff, Int.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational_mul_int_iff irrational_mul_int_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_nat_mul_iff : Irrational (n * x) ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_natCast, irrational_rat_mul_iff, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational_nat_mul_iff irrational_nat_mul_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_mul_nat_iff : Irrational (x * n) ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_natCast, irrational_mul_rat_iff, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational_mul_nat_iff irrational_mul_nat_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 626 | 627 | theorem irrational_rat_div_iff : Irrational (q / x) ↔ q ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by |
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.factorization.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# Prime factorizations
`n.factorization` is the finitely supported function `ℕ →₀ ℕ`
mapping each prime factor of `n` to its multiplicity in `n`. For example, since 2000 = 2^4 * 5^3,
* `factorization 2000 2` is 4
* `factorization 2000 5` is 3
* `factorization 2000 k` is 0 for all other `k : ℕ`.
## TODO
* As discussed in this Zulip thread:
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/217875/topic/Multiplicity.20in.20the.20naturals
We have lots of disparate ways of talking about the multiplicity of a prime
in a natural number, including `factors.count`, `padicValNat`, `multiplicity`,
and the material in `Data/PNat/Factors`. Move some of this material to this file,
prove results about the relationships between these definitions,
and (where appropriate) choose a uniform canonical way of expressing these ideas.
* Moreover, the results here should be generalised to an arbitrary unique factorization monoid
with a normalization function, and then deduplicated. The basics of this have been started in
`RingTheory/UniqueFactorizationDomain`.
* Extend the inductions to any `NormalizationMonoid` with unique factorization.
-/
-- Workaround for lean4#2038
attribute [-instance] instBEqNat
open Nat Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-- `n.factorization` is the finitely supported function `ℕ →₀ ℕ`
mapping each prime factor of `n` to its multiplicity in `n`. -/
def factorization (n : ℕ) : ℕ →₀ ℕ where
support := n.primeFactors
toFun p := if p.Prime then padicValNat p n else 0
mem_support_toFun := by simp [not_or]; aesop
#align nat.factorization Nat.factorization
/-- The support of `n.factorization` is exactly `n.primeFactors`. -/
@[simp] lemma support_factorization (n : ℕ) : (factorization n).support = n.primeFactors := rfl
theorem factorization_def (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : n.factorization p = padicValNat p n := by
simpa [factorization] using absurd pp
#align nat.factorization_def Nat.factorization_def
/-- We can write both `n.factorization p` and `n.factors.count p` to represent the power
of `p` in the factorization of `n`: we declare the former to be the simp-normal form. -/
@[simp]
theorem factors_count_eq {n p : ℕ} : n.factors.count p = n.factorization p := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn0)
· simp [factorization, count]
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt prime_of_mem_factors pp)]
simp [factorization, pp]
simp only [factorization_def _ pp]
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
exact List.le_count_iff_replicate_sublist.mp le_rfl |>.subperm
· rw [← lt_add_one_iff, lt_iff_not_ge, ge_iff_le,
le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
intro h
have := h.count_le p
simp at this
#align nat.factors_count_eq Nat.factors_count_eq
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 84 | 87 | theorem factorization_eq_factors_multiset (n : ℕ) :
n.factorization = Multiset.toFinsupp (n.factors : Multiset ℕ) := by |
ext p
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.StructuredArrow
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.PUnit
#align_import category_theory.elements from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8a318021995877a44630c898d0b2bc376fceef3b"
/-!
# The category of elements
This file defines the category of elements, also known as (a special case of) the Grothendieck
construction.
Given a functor `F : C ⥤ Type`, an object of `F.Elements` is a pair `(X : C, x : F.obj X)`.
A morphism `(X, x) ⟶ (Y, y)` is a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` in `C`, so `F.map f` takes `x` to `y`.
## Implementation notes
This construction is equivalent to a special case of a comma construction, so this is mostly just a
more convenient API. We prove the equivalence in
`CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.structuredArrowEquivalence`.
## References
* [Emily Riehl, *Category Theory in Context*, Section 2.4][riehl2017]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_of_elements>
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/category+of+elements>
## Tags
category of elements, Grothendieck construction, comma category
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- The type of objects for the category of elements of a functor `F : C ⥤ Type`
is a pair `(X : C, x : F.obj X)`.
-/
def Functor.Elements (F : C ⥤ Type w) :=
Σc : C, F.obj c
#align category_theory.functor.elements CategoryTheory.Functor.Elements
-- Porting note: added because Sigma.ext would be triggered automatically
lemma Functor.Elements.ext {F : C ⥤ Type w} (x y : F.Elements) (h₁ : x.fst = y.fst)
(h₂ : F.map (eqToHom h₁) x.snd = y.snd) : x = y := by
cases x
cases y
cases h₁
simp only [eqToHom_refl, FunctorToTypes.map_id_apply] at h₂
simp [h₂]
/-- The category structure on `F.Elements`, for `F : C ⥤ Type`.
A morphism `(X, x) ⟶ (Y, y)` is a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` in `C`, so `F.map f` takes `x` to `y`.
-/
instance categoryOfElements (F : C ⥤ Type w) : Category.{v} F.Elements where
Hom p q := { f : p.1 ⟶ q.1 // (F.map f) p.2 = q.2 }
id p := ⟨𝟙 p.1, by aesop_cat⟩
comp {X Y Z} f g := ⟨f.val ≫ g.val, by simp [f.2, g.2]⟩
#align category_theory.category_of_elements CategoryTheory.categoryOfElements
namespace CategoryOfElements
@[ext]
theorem ext (F : C ⥤ Type w) {x y : F.Elements} (f g : x ⟶ y) (w : f.val = g.val) : f = g :=
Subtype.ext_val w
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.ext CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.ext
@[simp]
theorem comp_val {F : C ⥤ Type w} {p q r : F.Elements} {f : p ⟶ q} {g : q ⟶ r} :
(f ≫ g).val = f.val ≫ g.val :=
rfl
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.comp_val CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.comp_val
@[simp]
theorem id_val {F : C ⥤ Type w} {p : F.Elements} : (𝟙 p : p ⟶ p).val = 𝟙 p.1 :=
rfl
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.id_val CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.id_val
@[simp]
theorem map_snd {F : C ⥤ Type w} {p q : F.Elements} (f : p ⟶ q) : (F.map f.val) p.2 = q.2 :=
f.property
end CategoryOfElements
instance groupoidOfElements {G : Type u} [Groupoid.{v} G] (F : G ⥤ Type w) :
Groupoid F.Elements where
inv {p q} f :=
⟨Groupoid.inv f.val,
calc
F.map (Groupoid.inv f.val) q.2 = F.map (Groupoid.inv f.val) (F.map f.val p.2) := by rw [f.2]
_ = (F.map f.val ≫ F.map (Groupoid.inv f.val)) p.2 := rfl
_ = p.2 := by
rw [← F.map_comp]
simp
⟩
inv_comp _ := by
ext
simp
comp_inv _ := by
ext
simp
#align category_theory.groupoid_of_elements CategoryTheory.groupoidOfElements
namespace CategoryOfElements
variable (F : C ⥤ Type w)
/-- The functor out of the category of elements which forgets the element. -/
@[simps]
def π : F.Elements ⥤ C where
obj X := X.1
map f := f.val
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.π CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.π
instance : (π F).Faithful where
instance : (π F).ReflectsIsomorphisms where
reflects {X Y} f h := ⟨⟨⟨inv ((π F).map f),
by rw [← map_snd f, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]; simp⟩, by aesop_cat⟩⟩
/-- A natural transformation between functors induces a functor between the categories of elements.
-/
@[simps]
def map {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (α : F₁ ⟶ F₂) : F₁.Elements ⥤ F₂.Elements where
obj t := ⟨t.1, α.app t.1 t.2⟩
map {t₁ t₂} k := ⟨k.1, by simpa [map_snd] using (FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ α k.1 t₁.2).symm⟩
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.map CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.map
@[simp]
theorem map_π {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (α : F₁ ⟶ F₂) : map α ⋙ π F₂ = π F₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.map_π CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.map_π
/-- The forward direction of the equivalence `F.Elements ≅ (*, F)`. -/
def toStructuredArrow : F.Elements ⥤ StructuredArrow PUnit F where
obj X := StructuredArrow.mk fun _ => X.2
map {X Y} f := StructuredArrow.homMk f.val (by funext; simp [f.2])
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.to_structured_arrow CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.toStructuredArrow
@[simp]
theorem toStructuredArrow_obj (X) :
(toStructuredArrow F).obj X =
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩
right := X.1
hom := fun _ => X.2 } :=
rfl
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.to_structured_arrow_obj CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.toStructuredArrow_obj
@[simp]
theorem to_comma_map_right {X Y} (f : X ⟶ Y) : ((toStructuredArrow F).map f).right = f.val :=
rfl
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.to_comma_map_right CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.to_comma_map_right
/-- The reverse direction of the equivalence `F.Elements ≅ (*, F)`. -/
def fromStructuredArrow : StructuredArrow PUnit F ⥤ F.Elements where
obj X := ⟨X.right, X.hom PUnit.unit⟩
map f := ⟨f.right, congr_fun f.w.symm PUnit.unit⟩
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.from_structured_arrow CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.fromStructuredArrow
@[simp]
theorem fromStructuredArrow_obj (X) : (fromStructuredArrow F).obj X = ⟨X.right, X.hom PUnit.unit⟩ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.from_structured_arrow_obj CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.fromStructuredArrow_obj
@[simp]
theorem fromStructuredArrow_map {X Y} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(fromStructuredArrow F).map f = ⟨f.right, congr_fun f.w.symm PUnit.unit⟩ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.from_structured_arrow_map CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.fromStructuredArrow_map
/-- The equivalence between the category of elements `F.Elements`
and the comma category `(*, F)`. -/
@[simps! functor_obj functor_map inverse_obj inverse_map unitIso_hom
unitIso_inv counitIso_hom counitIso_inv]
def structuredArrowEquivalence : F.Elements ≌ StructuredArrow PUnit F :=
Equivalence.mk (toStructuredArrow F) (fromStructuredArrow F)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun X => eqToIso (by aesop_cat))
(NatIso.ofComponents fun X => StructuredArrow.isoMk (Iso.refl _))
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.structured_arrow_equivalence CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.structuredArrowEquivalence
open Opposite
/-- The forward direction of the equivalence `F.Elementsᵒᵖ ≅ (yoneda, F)`,
given by `CategoryTheory.yonedaEquiv`.
-/
@[simps]
def toCostructuredArrow (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v) : F.Elementsᵒᵖ ⥤ CostructuredArrow yoneda F where
obj X := CostructuredArrow.mk (yonedaEquiv.symm (unop X).2)
map f := by
fapply CostructuredArrow.homMk
· exact f.unop.val.unop
· ext Z y
dsimp [yonedaEquiv]
simp only [FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← f.unop.2]
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.to_costructured_arrow CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.toCostructuredArrow
/-- The reverse direction of the equivalence `F.Elementsᵒᵖ ≅ (yoneda, F)`,
given by `CategoryTheory.yonedaEquiv`.
-/
@[simps]
def fromCostructuredArrow (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v) : (CostructuredArrow yoneda F)ᵒᵖ ⥤ F.Elements where
obj X := ⟨op (unop X).1, yonedaEquiv.1 (unop X).3⟩
map {X Y} f :=
⟨f.unop.1.op, by
convert (congr_fun ((unop X).hom.naturality f.unop.left.op) (𝟙 _)).symm
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, yonedaEquiv_apply, types_comp_apply,
Category.comp_id, yoneda_obj_map]
have : yoneda.map f.unop.left ≫ (unop X).hom = (unop Y).hom := by
convert f.unop.3
erw [← this]
simp only [yoneda_map_app, FunctorToTypes.comp]
erw [Category.id_comp]⟩
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.from_costructured_arrow CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.fromCostructuredArrow
@[simp]
theorem fromCostructuredArrow_obj_mk (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v) {X : C} (f : yoneda.obj X ⟶ F) :
(fromCostructuredArrow F).obj (op (CostructuredArrow.mk f)) = ⟨op X, yonedaEquiv.1 f⟩ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.category_of_elements.from_costructured_arrow_obj_mk CategoryTheory.CategoryOfElements.fromCostructuredArrow_obj_mk
/-- The unit of the equivalence `F.Elementsᵒᵖ ≅ (yoneda, F)` is indeed iso. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Elements.lean | 229 | 240 | theorem from_toCostructuredArrow_eq (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v) :
(toCostructuredArrow F).rightOp ⋙ fromCostructuredArrow F = 𝟭 _ := by |
refine Functor.ext ?_ ?_
· intro X
exact Functor.Elements.ext _ _ rfl (by simp [yonedaEquiv])
· intro X Y f
have : ∀ {a b : F.Elements} (H : a = b),
(eqToHom H).1 = eqToHom (show a.fst = b.fst by cases H; rfl) := by
rintro _ _ rfl
simp
ext
simp [this]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Instances
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.list.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists Set.range
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
-- Porting note: Delete this attribute
-- attribute [inline] List.head!
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
#align list.unique_of_is_empty List.uniqueOfIsEmpty
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
#align list.cons_ne_nil List.cons_ne_nil
#align list.cons_ne_self List.cons_ne_self
#align list.head_eq_of_cons_eq List.head_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
#align list.tail_eq_of_cons_eq List.tail_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
#align list.cons_injective List.cons_injective
#align list.cons_inj List.cons_inj
#align list.cons_eq_cons List.cons_eq_cons
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
#align list.singleton_injective List.singleton_injective
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align list.singleton_inj List.singleton_inj
#align list.exists_cons_of_ne_nil List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
#align list.set_of_mem_cons List.set_of_mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
#align list.mem_singleton_self List.mem_singleton_self
#align list.eq_of_mem_singleton List.eq_of_mem_singleton
#align list.mem_singleton List.mem_singleton
#align list.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem List.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
#align decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.not_mem_append List.not_mem_append
#align list.ne_nil_of_mem List.ne_nil_of_mem
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias mem_split := append_of_mem
#align list.mem_split List.append_of_mem
#align list.mem_of_ne_of_mem List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
#align list.ne_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem List.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem
#align list.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.mem_map List.mem_map
#align list.exists_of_mem_map List.exists_of_mem_map
#align list.mem_map_of_mem List.mem_map_of_memₓ -- implicits order
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
#align list.mem_map_of_injective List.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
#align function.involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
#align list.mem_map_of_involutive List.mem_map_of_involutive
#align list.forall_mem_map_iff List.forall_mem_map_iffₓ -- universe order
#align list.map_eq_nil List.map_eq_nilₓ -- universe order
attribute [simp] List.mem_join
#align list.mem_join List.mem_join
#align list.exists_of_mem_join List.exists_of_mem_join
#align list.mem_join_of_mem List.mem_join_of_memₓ -- implicits order
attribute [simp] List.mem_bind
#align list.mem_bind List.mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3, And in Lean4
#align list.exists_of_mem_bind List.exists_of_mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
#align list.mem_bind_of_mem List.mem_bind_of_memₓ -- implicits order
#align list.bind_map List.bind_mapₓ -- implicits order
theorem map_bind (g : β → List γ) (f : α → β) :
∀ l : List α, (List.map f l).bind g = l.bind fun a => g (f a)
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by simp only [cons_bind, map_cons, map_bind _ _ l]
#align list.map_bind List.map_bind
/-! ### length -/
#align list.length_eq_zero List.length_eq_zero
#align list.length_singleton List.length_singleton
#align list.length_pos_of_mem List.length_pos_of_mem
#align list.exists_mem_of_length_pos List.exists_mem_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_iff_exists_mem List.length_pos_iff_exists_mem
alias ⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos
#align list.ne_nil_of_length_pos List.ne_nil_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_of_ne_nil List.length_pos_of_ne_nil
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
#align list.length_pos_iff_ne_nil List.length_pos_iff_ne_nil
#align list.exists_mem_of_ne_nil List.exists_mem_of_ne_nil
#align list.length_eq_one List.length_eq_one
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
#align list.exists_of_length_succ List.exists_of_length_succ
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· apply ih; simpa using hl
#align list.length_injective_iff List.length_injective_iff
@[simp default+1] -- Porting note: this used to be just @[simp]
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
#align list.length_injective List.length_injective
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_two List.length_eq_two
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_three List.length_eq_three
#align list.sublist.length_le List.Sublist.length_le
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
#align list.has_singleton List.instSingletonList
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_emptyc_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg (not_mem_nil _) }
#align list.empty_eq List.empty_eq
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
#align list.singleton_eq List.singleton_eq
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
#align list.insert_neg List.insert_neg
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
#align list.insert_pos List.insert_pos
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
#align list.doubleton_eq List.doubleton_eq
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
#align list.forall_mem_nil List.forall_mem_nil
#align list.forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
#align list.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons
#align list.forall_mem_singleton List.forall_mem_singleton
#align list.forall_mem_append List.forall_mem_append
#align list.not_exists_mem_nil List.not_exists_mem_nilₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of List.exists_mem_cons_ofₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of_exists List.exists_mem_cons_of_existsₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
#align list.or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons List.or_exists_of_exists_mem_consₓ -- bExists change
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
#align list.exists_mem_cons_iff List.exists_mem_cons_iff
/-! ### list subset -/
instance : IsTrans (List α) Subset where
trans := fun _ _ _ => List.Subset.trans
#align list.subset_def List.subset_def
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_left List.subset_append_of_subset_left
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_right List.subset_append_of_subset_right
#align list.cons_subset List.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
#align list.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem List.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
#align list.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset List.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.append_subset_iff List.append_subset
alias ⟨eq_nil_of_subset_nil, _⟩ := subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_of_subset_nil List.eq_nil_of_subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem
#align list.map_subset List.map_subset
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
#align list.map_subset_iff List.map_subset_iff
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
#align list.append_eq_has_append List.append_eq_has_append
#align list.singleton_append List.singleton_append
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right
#align list.append_eq_nil List.append_eq_nil
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.nil_eq_append_iff List.nil_eq_append
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias append_eq_cons_iff := append_eq_cons
#align list.append_eq_cons_iff List.append_eq_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias cons_eq_append_iff := cons_eq_append
#align list.cons_eq_append_iff List.cons_eq_append
#align list.append_eq_append_iff List.append_eq_append_iff
#align list.take_append_drop List.take_append_drop
#align list.append_inj List.append_inj
#align list.append_inj_right List.append_inj_rightₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left List.append_inj_leftₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj' List.append_inj'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_right' List.append_inj_right'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left' List.append_inj_left'ₓ -- implicits order
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_left_cancel := append_cancel_left
#align list.append_left_cancel List.append_cancel_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_right_cancel := append_cancel_right
#align list.append_right_cancel List.append_cancel_right
@[simp] theorem append_left_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [← append_left_inj (s₁ := x), nil_append]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_left {x y : List α} : y = x ++ y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_left_eq_self]
@[simp] theorem append_right_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = x ↔ y = [] := by
rw [← append_right_inj (t₁ := y), append_nil]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_right {x y : List α} : x = x ++ y ↔ y = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_right_eq_self]
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
#align list.append_right_injective List.append_right_injective
#align list.append_right_inj List.append_right_inj
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
#align list.append_left_injective List.append_left_injective
#align list.append_left_inj List.append_left_inj
#align list.map_eq_append_split List.map_eq_append_split
/-! ### replicate -/
@[simp] lemma replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = [] := rfl
#align list.replicate_zero List.replicate_zero
attribute [simp] replicate_succ
#align list.replicate_succ List.replicate_succ
lemma replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = [a] := rfl
#align list.replicate_one List.replicate_one
#align list.length_replicate List.length_replicate
#align list.mem_replicate List.mem_replicate
#align list.eq_of_mem_replicate List.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length]
#align list.eq_replicate_length List.eq_replicate_length
#align list.eq_replicate_of_mem List.eq_replicate_of_mem
#align list.eq_replicate List.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
induction m <;> simp [*, succ_add, replicate]
#align list.replicate_add List.replicate_add
theorem replicate_succ' (n) (a : α) : replicate (n + 1) a = replicate n a ++ [a] :=
replicate_add n 1 a
#align list.replicate_succ' List.replicate_succ'
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
#align list.replicate_subset_singleton List.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
#align list.subset_singleton_iff List.subset_singleton_iff
@[simp] theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (n) (a : α) :
map f (replicate n a) = replicate n (f a) := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, map]]
#align list.map_replicate List.map_replicate
@[simp] theorem tail_replicate (a : α) (n) :
tail (replicate n a) = replicate (n - 1) a := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.tail_replicate List.tail_replicate
@[simp] theorem join_replicate_nil (n : ℕ) : join (replicate n []) = @nil α := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, join, append_nil]]
#align list.join_replicate_nil List.join_replicate_nil
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align list.replicate_right_injective List.replicate_right_injective
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_right_inj List.replicate_right_inj
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
#align list.replicate_right_inj' List.replicate_right_inj'
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate · a)
#align list.replicate_left_injective List.replicate_left_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_left_inj List.replicate_left_inj
@[simp] theorem head_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) (h) : head (replicate n a) h = a := by
cases n <;> simp at h ⊢
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
#align list.mem_pure List.mem_pure
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.bind f :=
rfl
#align list.bind_eq_bind List.bind_eq_bind
#align list.bind_append List.append_bind
/-! ### concat -/
#align list.concat_nil List.concat_nil
#align list.concat_cons List.concat_cons
#align list.concat_eq_append List.concat_eq_append
#align list.init_eq_of_concat_eq List.init_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.last_eq_of_concat_eq List.last_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.concat_ne_nil List.concat_ne_nil
#align list.concat_append List.concat_append
#align list.length_concat List.length_concat
#align list.append_concat List.append_concat
/-! ### reverse -/
#align list.reverse_nil List.reverse_nil
#align list.reverse_core List.reverseAux
-- Porting note: Do we need this?
attribute [local simp] reverseAux
#align list.reverse_cons List.reverse_cons
#align list.reverse_core_eq List.reverseAux_eq
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
#align list.reverse_cons' List.reverse_cons'
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
#align list.reverse_singleton List.reverse_singleton
#align list.reverse_append List.reverse_append
#align list.reverse_concat List.reverse_concat
#align list.reverse_reverse List.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
#align list.reverse_involutive List.reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
#align list.reverse_injective List.reverse_injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
#align list.reverse_surjective List.reverse_surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
#align list.reverse_bijective List.reverse_bijective
@[simp]
theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : List α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_inj List.reverse_inj
theorem reverse_eq_iff {l l' : List α} : l.reverse = l' ↔ l = l'.reverse :=
reverse_involutive.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_iff List.reverse_eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_nil List.reverse_eq_nil_iff
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
#align list.concat_eq_reverse_cons List.concat_eq_reverse_cons
#align list.length_reverse List.length_reverse
-- Porting note: This one was @[simp] in mathlib 3,
-- but Lean contains a competing simp lemma reverse_map.
-- For now we remove @[simp] to avoid simplification loops.
-- TODO: Change Lean lemma to match mathlib 3?
theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
(reverse_map f l).symm
#align list.map_reverse List.map_reverse
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
#align list.map_reverse_core List.map_reverseAux
#align list.mem_reverse List.mem_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_replicate (n) (a : α) : reverse (replicate n a) = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate.2
⟨by rw [length_reverse, length_replicate],
fun b h => eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
#align list.reverse_replicate List.reverse_replicate
/-! ### empty -/
-- Porting note: this does not work as desired
-- attribute [simp] List.isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_iff_eq_nil {l : List α} : l.isEmpty ↔ l = [] := by cases l <;> simp [isEmpty]
#align list.empty_iff_eq_nil List.isEmpty_iff_eq_nil
/-! ### dropLast -/
#align list.length_init List.length_dropLast
/-! ### getLast -/
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons {a : α} {l : List α} :
∀ h : l ≠ nil, getLast (a :: l) (cons_ne_nil a l) = getLast l h := by
induction l <;> intros
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.last_cons List.getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l _ (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp only [getLast_append]
#align list.last_append_singleton List.getLast_append_singleton
-- Porting note: name should be fixed upstream
theorem getLast_append' (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l₁ l₂ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction' l₁ with _ _ ih
· simp
· simp only [cons_append]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
exact ih
#align list.last_append List.getLast_append'
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (concat_ne_nil a l) = a :=
getLast_concat ..
#align list.last_concat List.getLast_concat'
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
#align list.last_singleton List.getLast_singleton'
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
#align list.last_cons_cons List.getLast_cons_cons
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [a], h => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
#align list.init_append_last List.dropLast_append_getLast
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
#align list.last_congr List.getLast_congr
#align list.last_mem List.getLast_mem
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ (length_replicate _ _)) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
#align list.last_replicate_succ List.getLast_replicate_succ
/-! ### getLast? -/
-- Porting note: Moved earlier in file, for use in subsequent lemmas.
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_cons_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) :
getLast? (a :: b :: l) = getLast? (b :: l) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isNone : ∀ {l : List α}, (getLast? l).isNone ↔ l = []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isNone (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_none List.getLast?_isNone
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isSome : ∀ {l : List α}, l.getLast?.isSome ↔ l ≠ []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isSome (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_some List.getLast?_isSome
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
#align list.mem_last'_eq_last List.mem_getLast?_eq_getLast
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
#align list.last'_eq_last_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
#align list.mem_last'_cons List.mem_getLast?_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_getLast? {l : List α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.getLast?) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := mem_getLast?_eq_getLast ha
h₂.symm ▸ getLast_mem _
#align list.mem_of_mem_last' List.mem_of_mem_getLast?
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
#align list.init_append_last' List.dropLast_append_getLast?
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [a] => rfl
| [a, b] => rfl
| [a, b, c] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
#align list.ilast_eq_last' List.getLastI_eq_getLast?
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], a, l₂ => rfl
| [b], a, l₂ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
#align list.last'_append_cons List.getLast?_append_cons
#align list.last'_cons_cons List.getLast?_cons_cons
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
#align list.last'_append_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem getLast?_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
#align list.last'_append List.getLast?_append
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head_eq_head' List.head!_eq_head?
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_head List.surjective_head!
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
#align list.surjective_head' List.surjective_head?
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_tail List.surjective_tail
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
#align list.eq_cons_of_mem_head' List.eq_cons_of_mem_head?
theorem mem_of_mem_head? {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l.head?) : x ∈ l :=
(eq_cons_of_mem_head? h).symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
#align list.mem_of_mem_head' List.mem_of_mem_head?
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
#align list.head_cons List.head!_cons
#align list.tail_nil List.tail_nil
#align list.tail_cons List.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.head_append List.head!_append
theorem head?_append {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) : x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
#align list.head'_append List.head?_append
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
#align list.head'_append_of_ne_nil List.head?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
#align list.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
#align list.cons_head'_tail List.cons_head?_tail
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| a :: l, _ => rfl
#align list.head_mem_head' List.head!_mem_head?
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
#align list.cons_head_tail List.cons_head!_tail
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' := mem_cons_self l.head! l.tail
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
#align list.head_mem_self List.head!_mem_self
theorem head_mem {l : List α} : ∀ (h : l ≠ nil), l.head h ∈ l := by
cases l <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head?_map (f : α → β) (l) : head? (map f l) = (head? l).map f := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head'_map List.head?_map
theorem tail_append_of_ne_nil (l l' : List α) (h : l ≠ []) : (l ++ l').tail = l.tail ++ l' := by
cases l
· contradiction
· simp
#align list.tail_append_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_of_ne_nil
#align list.nth_le_eq_iff List.get_eq_iff
theorem get_eq_get? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = (l.get? i).get (by simp [get?_eq_get]) := by
simp [get_eq_iff]
#align list.some_nth_le_eq List.get?_eq_get
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false -- TODO(Mario): make replacements for theorems in this section
/-- nth element of a list `l` given `n < l.length`. -/
@[deprecated get (since := "2023-01-05")]
def nthLe (l : List α) (n) (h : n < l.length) : α := get l ⟨n, h⟩
#align list.nth_le List.nthLe
@[simp] theorem nthLe_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.nthLe i h = l.nthLe (i + 1) h' := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
#align list.nth_le_tail List.nthLe_tail
theorem nthLe_cons_aux {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : n < (a :: l).length) :
n - 1 < l.length := by
contrapose! h
rw [length_cons]
omega
#align list.nth_le_cons_aux List.nthLe_cons_aux
theorem nthLe_cons {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hl) :
(a :: l).nthLe n hl = if hn : n = 0 then a else l.nthLe (n - 1) (nthLe_cons_aux hn hl) := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [nthLe, h]
cases l
· rw [length_singleton, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hl
omega
cases n
· contradiction
rfl
#align list.nth_le_cons List.nthLe_cons
end deprecated
-- Porting note: List.modifyHead has @[simp], and Lean 4 treats this as
-- an invitation to unfold modifyHead in any context,
-- not just use the equational lemmas.
-- @[simp]
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem modifyHead_modifyHead (l : List α) (f g : α → α) :
(l.modifyHead f).modifyHead g = l.modifyHead (g ∘ f) := by cases l <;> simp
#align list.modify_head_modify_head List.modifyHead_modifyHead
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def reverseRecOn {motive : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) : motive l :=
match h : reverse l with
| [] => cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
nil
| head :: tail =>
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
append_singleton _ head <| reverseRecOn (reverse tail) nil append_singleton
termination_by l.length
decreasing_by
simp_wf
rw [← length_reverse l, h, length_cons]
simp [Nat.lt_succ]
#align list.reverse_rec_on List.reverseRecOn
@[simp]
theorem reverseRecOn_nil {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn [] nil append_singleton = nil := reverseRecOn.eq_1 ..
-- `unusedHavesSuffices` is getting confused by the unfolding of `reverseRecOn`
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem reverseRecOn_concat {motive : List α → Sort*} (x : α) (xs : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
append_singleton _ _ (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) xs nil append_singleton) := by
suffices ∀ ys (h : reverse (reverse xs) = ys),
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
cast (by simp [(reverse_reverse _).symm.trans h])
(append_singleton _ x (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) ys nil append_singleton)) by
exact this _ (reverse_reverse xs)
intros ys hy
conv_lhs => unfold reverseRecOn
split
next h => simp at h
next heq =>
revert heq
simp only [reverse_append, reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, singleton_append, cons.injEq]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
subst ys
rfl
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def bidirectionalRec {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
∀ l, motive l
| [] => nil
| [a] => singleton a
| a :: b :: l =>
let l' := dropLast (b :: l)
let b' := getLast (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
cast (by rw [← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)]) <|
cons_append a l' b' (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l')
termination_by l => l.length
#align list.bidirectional_rec List.bidirectionalRecₓ -- universe order
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_nil {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [] = nil := bidirectionalRec.eq_1 ..
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_singleton {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) (a : α):
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [a] = singleton a := by
simp [bidirectionalRec]
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_cons_append {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b])))
(a : α) (l : List α) (b : α) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append (a :: (l ++ [b])) =
cons_append a l b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bidirectionalRec
cases l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs =>
simp only [List.cons_append]
dsimp only [← List.cons_append]
suffices ∀ (ys init : List α) (hinit : init = ys) (last : α) (hlast : last = b),
(cons_append a init last
(bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append init)) =
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simp [hinit, hlast])
(cons_append a ys b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append ys)) by
rw [this (x :: xs) _ (by rw [dropLast_append_cons, dropLast_single, append_nil]) _ (by simp)]
simp
rintro ys init rfl last rfl
rfl
/-- Like `bidirectionalRec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
abbrev bidirectionalRecOn {C : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ a : α, C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectionalRec H0 H1 Hn l
#align list.bidirectional_rec_on List.bidirectionalRecOn
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
#align list.nil_sublist List.nil_sublist
#align list.sublist.refl List.Sublist.refl
#align list.sublist.trans List.Sublist.trans
#align list.sublist_cons List.sublist_cons
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist List.sublist_of_cons_sublist
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
#align list.sublist.cons_cons List.Sublist.cons_cons
#align list.sublist_append_left List.sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist_append_right List.sublist_append_right
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
#align list.sublist_cons_of_sublist List.sublist_cons_of_sublist
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_left List.sublist_append_of_sublist_left
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_right List.sublist_append_of_sublist_right
theorem tail_sublist : ∀ l : List α, tail l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a::l => sublist_cons a l
#align list.tail_sublist List.tail_sublist
@[gcongr] protected theorem Sublist.tail : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → tail l₁ <+ tail l₂
| _, _, slnil => .slnil
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ h => (tail_sublist _).trans h
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ _ h => h
theorem Sublist.of_cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} {a b : α} (h : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.tail
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons List.Sublist.of_cons_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")]
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {a} (h : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ := h.of_cons_cons
attribute [simp] cons_sublist_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")] alias cons_sublist_cons_iff := cons_sublist_cons
#align list.cons_sublist_cons_iff List.cons_sublist_cons_iff
#align list.append_sublist_append_left List.append_sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist.append_right List.Sublist.append_right
#align list.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist List.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist
#align list.sublist.reverse List.Sublist.reverse
#align list.reverse_sublist_iff List.reverse_sublist
#align list.append_sublist_append_right List.append_sublist_append_right
#align list.sublist.append List.Sublist.append
#align list.sublist.subset List.Sublist.subset
#align list.singleton_sublist List.singleton_sublist
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : List α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil <| s.subset
#align list.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil List.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil
-- Porting note: this lemma seems to have been renamed on the occasion of its move to Batteries
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
#align list.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil List.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
#align list.replicate_sublist_replicate List.replicate_sublist_replicate
theorem sublist_replicate_iff {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ} :
l <+ replicate n a ↔ ∃ k ≤ n, l = replicate k a :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨l.length, h.length_le.trans_eq (length_replicate _ _),
eq_replicate_length.mpr fun b hb => eq_of_mem_replicate (h.subset hb)⟩,
by rintro ⟨k, h, rfl⟩; exact (replicate_sublist_replicate _).mpr h⟩
#align list.sublist_replicate_iff List.sublist_replicate_iff
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length List.Sublist.eq_of_length
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length_le List.Sublist.eq_of_length_le
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
#align list.sublist.antisymm List.Sublist.antisymm
instance decidableSublist [DecidableEq α] : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [], _ => isTrue <| nil_sublist _
| _ :: _, [] => isFalse fun h => List.noConfusion <| eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ =>
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist l₁ l₂) <| h ▸ cons_sublist_cons.symm
else
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist (a :: l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, fun s =>
match a, l₁, s, h with
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ s', h => s'
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ t _, h => absurd rfl h⟩
#align list.decidable_sublist List.decidableSublist
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
#align list.index_of_nil List.indexOf_nil
/-
Porting note: The following proofs were simpler prior to the port. These proofs use the low-level
`findIdx.go`.
* `indexOf_cons_self`
* `indexOf_cons_eq`
* `indexOf_cons_ne`
* `indexOf_cons`
The ported versions of the earlier proofs are given in comments.
-/
-- indexOf_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_self (a : α) (l : List α) : indexOf a (a :: l) = 0 := by
rw [indexOf, findIdx_cons, beq_self_eq_true, cond]
#align list.index_of_cons_self List.indexOf_cons_self
-- fun e => if_pos e
theorem indexOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → indexOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact indexOf_cons_self b l
#align list.index_of_cons_eq List.indexOf_cons_eq
-- fun n => if_neg n
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → indexOf a (b :: l) = succ (indexOf a l)
| h => by simp only [indexOf, findIdx_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, h, ite_false]
#align list.index_of_cons_ne List.indexOf_cons_ne
#align list.index_of_cons List.indexOf_cons
theorem indexOf_eq_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction' l with b l ih
· exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _)
simp only [length, mem_cons, indexOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or_iff]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj'
#align list.index_of_eq_length List.indexOf_eq_length
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → indexOf a l = length l :=
indexOf_eq_length.2
#align list.index_of_of_not_mem List.indexOf_of_not_mem
theorem indexOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction' l with b l ih; · rfl
simp only [length, indexOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
#align list.index_of_le_length List.indexOf_le_length
theorem indexOf_lt_length {a} {l : List α} : indexOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.by_contradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| indexOf_eq_length.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne indexOf_le_length) fun h => indexOf_eq_length.1 h al⟩
#align list.index_of_lt_length List.indexOf_lt_length
theorem indexOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = indexOf a l₁ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· exfalso
exact not_mem_nil a h
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [indexOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
#align list.index_of_append_of_mem List.indexOf_append_of_mem
theorem indexOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + indexOf a l₂ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
rw [List.cons_append, indexOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
#align list.index_of_append_of_not_mem List.indexOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated get_of_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := get_of_mem h; ⟨i.1, i.2, h⟩
#align list.nth_le_of_mem List.nthLe_of_mem
@[deprecated get?_eq_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_get? {l : List α} {n} (h) : get? l n = some (nthLe l n h) := get?_eq_get _
#align list.nth_le_nth List.nthLe_get?
#align list.nth_len_le List.get?_len_le
@[simp]
theorem get?_length (l : List α) : l.get? l.length = none := get?_len_le le_rfl
#align list.nth_length List.get?_length
#align list.nth_eq_some List.get?_eq_some
#align list.nth_eq_none_iff List.get?_eq_none
#align list.nth_of_mem List.get?_of_mem
@[deprecated get_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_mem (l : List α) (n h) : nthLe l n h ∈ l := get_mem ..
#align list.nth_le_mem List.nthLe_mem
#align list.nth_mem List.get?_mem
@[deprecated mem_iff_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem mem_iff_nthLe {a} {l : List α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
mem_iff_get.trans ⟨fun ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩ => ⟨n, h, e⟩, fun ⟨n, h, e⟩ => ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩⟩
#align list.mem_iff_nth_le List.mem_iff_nthLe
#align list.mem_iff_nth List.mem_iff_get?
#align list.nth_zero List.get?_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-03")] alias get?_injective := get?_inj
#align list.nth_injective List.get?_inj
#align list.nth_map List.get?_map
@[deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nthLe (map f l) n H1 = f (nthLe l n H2) := get_map ..
#align list.nth_le_map List.nthLe_map
/-- A version of `get_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem get_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} :
f (get l n) = get (map f l) ⟨n.1, (l.length_map f).symm ▸ n.2⟩ := Eq.symm (get_map _)
/-- A version of `nthLe_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
@[deprecated get_map_rev (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nthLe l n H) = nthLe (map f l) n ((l.length_map f).symm ▸ H) :=
(nthLe_map f _ _).symm
#align list.nth_le_map_rev List.nthLe_map_rev
@[simp, deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nthLe (map f l) n H = f (nthLe l n (l.length_map f ▸ H)) := nthLe_map f _ _
#align list.nth_le_map' List.nthLe_map'
#align list.nth_le_of_eq List.get_of_eq
@[simp, deprecated get_singleton (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) : nthLe [a] n hn = a := get_singleton ..
#align list.nth_le_singleton List.get_singleton
#align list.nth_le_zero List.get_mk_zero
#align list.nth_le_append List.get_append
@[deprecated get_append_right' (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_append_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nthLe n h₂ = l₂.nthLe (n - l₁.length) (get_append_right_aux h₁ h₂) :=
get_append_right' h₁ h₂
#align list.nth_le_append_right_aux List.get_append_right_aux
#align list.nth_le_append_right List.nthLe_append_right
#align list.nth_le_replicate List.get_replicate
#align list.nth_append List.get?_append
#align list.nth_append_right List.get?_append_right
#align list.last_eq_nth_le List.getLast_eq_get
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_get l _).symm
#align list.nth_le_length_sub_one List.get_length_sub_one
#align list.nth_concat_length List.get?_concat_length
@[deprecated get_cons_length (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_cons_length : ∀ (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : ℕ) (h : n = xs.length),
(x :: xs).nthLe n (by simp [h]) = (x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs) := get_cons_length
#align list.nth_le_cons_length List.nthLe_cons_length
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_get_cons h, take, take]
#align list.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length List.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length
#align list.ext List.ext
-- TODO one may rename ext in the standard library, and it is also not clear
-- which of ext_get?, ext_get?', ext_get should be @[ext], if any
alias ext_get? := ext
theorem ext_get?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, get?_eq_none.mpr]
theorem ext_get?_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔ ∀ n, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _; rfl, ext_get?⟩
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_get?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_get?'⟩
@[deprecated ext_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem ext_nthLe {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀ n h₁ h₂, nthLe l₁ n h₁ = nthLe l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_get hl h
#align list.ext_le List.ext_nthLe
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h), get l ⟨indexOf a l, h⟩ = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, indexOf_cons, get, @indexOf_get _ _ l, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
#align list.index_of_nth_le List.indexOf_get
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get? [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
get? l (indexOf a l) = some a := by rw [get?_eq_get, indexOf_get (indexOf_lt_length.2 h)]
#align list.index_of_nth List.indexOf_get?
@[deprecated (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem get_reverse_aux₁ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i h1 h2), get (reverseAux l r) ⟨i + length l, h1⟩ = get r ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i => fun h1 _ => rfl
| a :: l, r, i => by
rw [show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l from Nat.add_right_comm i (length l) 1]
exact fun h1 h2 => get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) (i + 1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux1 List.get_reverse_aux₁
theorem indexOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
indexOf x l = indexOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨indexOf x l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨indexOf y l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [indexOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
#align list.index_of_inj List.indexOf_inj
theorem get_reverse_aux₂ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i : Nat) (h1) (h2),
get (reverseAux l r) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i, h1, h2 => absurd h2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| a :: l, r, 0, h1, _ => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) 0
rw [Nat.zero_add] at aux
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
| a :: l, r, i + 1, h1, h2 => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₂ l (a :: r) i
have heq : length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1) = length l - 1 - i := by rw [length]; omega
rw [← heq] at aux
apply aux
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux2 List.get_reverse_aux₂
@[simp] theorem get_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
get (reverse l) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩ :=
get_reverse_aux₂ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp, deprecated get_reverse (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
nthLe (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nthLe l i h2 :=
get_reverse ..
#align list.nth_le_reverse List.nthLe_reverse
theorem nthLe_reverse' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.reverse.length) (hn') :
l.reverse.nthLe n hn = l.nthLe (l.length - 1 - n) hn' := by
rw [eq_comm]
convert nthLe_reverse l.reverse n (by simpa) hn using 1
simp
#align list.nth_le_reverse' List.nthLe_reverse'
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := nthLe_reverse' ..
-- FIXME: prove it the other way around
attribute [deprecated get_reverse' (since := "2023-01-05")] nthLe_reverse'
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nthLe 0 (by omega)] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp only [get_singleton]
congr
omega
#align list.eq_cons_of_length_one List.eq_cons_of_length_one
end deprecated
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail {f g : List α → List α} (m : ℕ) :
∀ (n) (l : List α),
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g (m + n) =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g m) n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, a :: l => congr_arg (List.cons a) (modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail m n l)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le {f g : List α → List α} (m n : ℕ) (l : List α)
(h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g m =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g (m - n)) n := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.add_comm, modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same {f g : List α → List α} (n : ℕ) (l : List α) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g n = l.modifyNthTail (g ∘ f) n := by
rw [modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le n n l (le_refl n), Nat.sub_self]; rfl
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same
#align list.modify_nth_tail_id List.modifyNthTail_id
#align list.remove_nth_eq_nth_tail List.eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
#align list.update_nth_eq_modify_nth List.set_eq_modifyNth
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias removeNth_eq_nthTail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNth_eq_set (f : α → α) :
∀ (n) (l : List α), modifyNth f n l = ((fun a => set l n (f a)) <$> get? l n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, b :: l =>
(congr_arg (cons b) (modifyNth_eq_set f n l)).trans <| by cases h : get? l n <;> simp [h]
#align list.modify_nth_eq_update_nth List.modifyNth_eq_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth List.get?_modifyNth
theorem length_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _ => @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (· + 1) (length_modifyNthTail _ H _ _)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_length List.length_modifyNthTail
-- Porting note: Duplicate of `modify_get?_length`
-- (but with a substantially better name?)
-- @[simp]
theorem length_modifyNth (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modify_get?_length f
#align list.modify_nth_length List.length_modifyNth
#align list.update_nth_length List.length_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth_eq List.get?_modifyNth_eq
#align list.nth_modify_nth_ne List.get?_modifyNth_ne
#align list.nth_update_nth_eq List.get?_set_eq
#align list.nth_update_nth_of_lt List.get?_set_eq_of_lt
#align list.nth_update_nth_ne List.get?_set_ne
#align list.update_nth_nil List.set_nil
#align list.update_nth_succ List.set_succ
#align list.update_nth_comm List.set_comm
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_eq List.get_set_eq
@[simp]
theorem get_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a).get ⟨j, hj⟩ = l.get ⟨j, by simpa using hj⟩ := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.get?_eq_get, List.get?_set_ne _ _ h, List.get?_eq_get]
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_of_ne List.get_set_of_ne
#align list.mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth List.mem_or_eq_of_mem_set
/-! ### map -/
#align list.map_nil List.map_nil
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = foldr (fun a bs => f a :: bs) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.map_eq_foldr List.map_eq_foldr
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : List α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: l, h => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h
rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
#align list.map_congr List.map_congr
theorem map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : List α} : map f l = map g l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x := by
refine ⟨?_, map_congr⟩; intro h x hx
rw [mem_iff_get] at hx; rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
rw [get_map_rev f, get_map_rev g]
congr!
#align list.map_eq_map_iff List.map_eq_map_iff
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_concat List.map_concat
#align list.map_id'' List.map_id'
theorem map_id'' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : List α) : map f l = l := by
simp [show f = id from funext h]
#align list.map_id' List.map_id''
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : List α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero <| by rw [← length_map l f, h]; rfl
#align list.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil List.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : List (List α)) : map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) := by
induction L <;> [rfl; simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_join List.map_join
theorem bind_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_bind ..
#align list.bind_ret_eq_map List.bind_pure_eq_map
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated bind_pure_eq_map (since := "2024-03-24")]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (List.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
bind_pure_eq_map f l
theorem bind_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
List.bind l f = List.bind l g :=
(congr_arg List.join <| map_congr h : _)
#align list.bind_congr List.bind_congr
theorem infix_bind_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.bind f :=
List.infix_of_mem_join (List.mem_map_of_mem f h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
#align list.map_eq_map List.map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.map_tail List.map_tail
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
(map_map _ _ _).symm
#align list.comp_map List.comp_map
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
#align list.map_comp_map List.map_comp_map
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
#align list.map_injective_iff List.map_injective_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (fun a bs => bif p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as := by
induction' as with head tail
· rfl
· simp only [foldr]
cases hp : p head <;> simp [filter, *]
#align list.map_filter_eq_foldr List.map_filter_eq_foldr
theorem getLast_map (f : α → β) {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).getLast (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.getLast hl) := by
induction' l with l_hd l_tl l_ih
· apply (hl rfl).elim
· cases l_tl
· simp
· simpa using l_ih _
#align list.last_map List.getLast_map
theorem map_eq_replicate_iff {l : List α} {f : α → β} {b : β} :
l.map f = replicate l.length b ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = b := by
simp [eq_replicate]
#align list.map_eq_replicate_iff List.map_eq_replicate_iff
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : List α) (b : β) : map (const α b) l = replicate l.length b :=
map_eq_replicate_iff.mpr fun _ _ => rfl
#align list.map_const List.map_const
@[simp] theorem map_const' (l : List α) (b : β) : map (fun _ => b) l = replicate l.length b :=
map_const l b
#align list.map_const' List.map_const'
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
#align list.eq_of_mem_map_const List.eq_of_mem_map_const
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem nil_zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (l : List β) : zipWith f [] l = [] := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.nil_map₂ List.nil_zipWith
theorem zipWith_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : List α) : zipWith f l [] = [] := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.map₂_nil List.zipWith_nil
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_flip (f : α → β → γ) : ∀ as bs, zipWith (flip f) bs as = zipWith f as bs
| [], [] => rfl
| [], b :: bs => rfl
| a :: as, [] => rfl
| a :: as, b :: bs => by
simp! [zipWith_flip]
rfl
#align list.map₂_flip List.zipWith_flip
/-! ### take, drop -/
#align list.take_zero List.take_zero
#align list.take_nil List.take_nil
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : List α) : take (succ n) (a :: l) = a :: take n l :=
rfl
#align list.take_cons List.take_cons
#align list.take_length List.take_length
#align list.take_all_of_le List.take_all_of_le
#align list.take_left List.take_left
#align list.take_left' List.take_left'
#align list.take_take List.take_take
#align list.take_replicate List.take_replicate
#align list.map_take List.map_take
#align list.take_append_eq_append_take List.take_append_eq_append_take
#align list.take_append_of_le_length List.take_append_of_le_length
#align list.take_append List.take_append
#align list.nth_le_take List.get_take
#align list.nth_le_take' List.get_take'
#align list.nth_take List.get?_take
#align list.nth_take_of_succ List.nth_take_of_succ
#align list.take_succ List.take_succ
#align list.take_eq_nil_iff List.take_eq_nil_iff
#align list.take_eq_take List.take_eq_take
#align list.take_add List.take_add
#align list.init_eq_take List.dropLast_eq_take
#align list.init_take List.dropLast_take
#align list.init_cons_of_ne_nil List.dropLast_cons_of_ne_nil
#align list.init_append_of_ne_nil List.dropLast_append_of_ne_nil
#align list.drop_eq_nil_of_le List.drop_eq_nil_of_le
#align list.drop_eq_nil_iff_le List.drop_eq_nil_iff_le
#align list.tail_drop List.tail_drop
@[simp]
theorem drop_tail (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.tail.drop n = l.drop (n + 1) := by
rw [drop_add, drop_one]
theorem cons_get_drop_succ {l : List α} {n} :
l.get n :: l.drop (n.1 + 1) = l.drop n.1 :=
(drop_eq_get_cons n.2).symm
#align list.cons_nth_le_drop_succ List.cons_get_drop_succ
#align list.drop_nil List.drop_nil
#align list.drop_one List.drop_one
#align list.drop_add List.drop_add
#align list.drop_left List.drop_left
#align list.drop_left' List.drop_left'
#align list.drop_eq_nth_le_cons List.drop_eq_get_consₓ -- nth_le vs get
#align list.drop_length List.drop_length
#align list.drop_length_cons List.drop_length_cons
#align list.drop_append_eq_append_drop List.drop_append_eq_append_drop
#align list.drop_append_of_le_length List.drop_append_of_le_length
#align list.drop_append List.drop_append
#align list.drop_sizeof_le List.drop_sizeOf_le
#align list.nth_le_drop List.get_drop
#align list.nth_le_drop' List.get_drop'
#align list.nth_drop List.get?_drop
#align list.drop_drop List.drop_drop
#align list.drop_take List.drop_take
#align list.map_drop List.map_drop
#align list.modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop List.modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop
#align list.modify_nth_eq_take_drop List.modifyNth_eq_take_drop
#align list.modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop List.modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop
#align list.update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop List.set_eq_take_cons_drop
#align list.reverse_take List.reverse_take
#align list.update_nth_eq_nil List.set_eq_nil
section TakeI
variable [Inhabited α]
@[simp]
theorem takeI_length : ∀ n l, length (@takeI α _ n l) = n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ => congr_arg succ (takeI_length _ _)
#align list.take'_length List.takeI_length
@[simp]
theorem takeI_nil : ∀ n, takeI n (@nil α) = replicate n default
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => congr_arg (cons _) (takeI_nil _)
#align list.take'_nil List.takeI_nil
theorem takeI_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : List α}, n ≤ length l → takeI n l = take n l
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _, h => congr_arg (cons _) <| takeI_eq_take <| le_of_succ_le_succ h
#align list.take'_eq_take List.takeI_eq_take
@[simp]
theorem takeI_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : takeI (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(takeI_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, Nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
#align list.take'_left List.takeI_left
theorem takeI_left' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) : takeI n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ := by
rw [← h]; apply takeI_left
#align list.take'_left' List.takeI_left'
end TakeI
/- Porting note: in mathlib3 we just had `take` and `take'`. Now we have `take`, `takeI`, and
`takeD`. The following section replicates the theorems above but for `takeD`. -/
section TakeD
@[simp]
theorem takeD_length : ∀ n l a, length (@takeD α n l a) = n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _, _ => congr_arg succ (takeD_length _ _ _)
-- Porting note: `takeD_nil` is already in std
theorem takeD_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : List α} a, n ≤ length l → takeD n l a = take n l
| 0, _, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _, a, h => congr_arg (cons _) <| takeD_eq_take a <| le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp]
theorem takeD_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : takeD (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) a = l₁ :=
(takeD_eq_take a (by simp only [length_append, Nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem takeD_left' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n} {a} (h : length l₁ = n) : takeD n (l₁ ++ l₂) a = l₁ := by
rw [← h]; apply takeD_left
end TakeD
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
#align list.foldl_ext List.foldl_ext
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction' l with hd tl ih; · rfl
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
#align list.foldr_ext List.foldr_ext
#align list.foldl_nil List.foldl_nil
#align list.foldl_cons List.foldl_cons
#align list.foldr_nil List.foldr_nil
#align list.foldr_cons List.foldr_cons
#align list.foldl_append List.foldl_append
#align list.foldr_append List.foldr_append
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
#align list.foldl_fixed' List.foldl_fixed'
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
#align list.foldr_fixed' List.foldr_fixed'
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
#align list.foldl_fixed List.foldl_fixed
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
#align list.foldr_fixed List.foldr_fixed
@[simp]
theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : List (List β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a, [] => rfl
| a, l :: L => by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join f (foldl f a l) L]
#align list.foldl_join List.foldl_join
@[simp]
theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : List (List α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (fun l b => foldr f b l) b L
| a, [] => rfl
| a, l :: L => by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join f a L, foldr_cons]
#align list.foldr_join List.foldr_join
#align list.foldl_reverse List.foldl_reverse
#align list.foldr_reverse List.foldr_reverse
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem foldr_eta : ∀ l : List α, foldr cons [] l = l := by
simp only [foldr_self_append, append_nil, forall_const]
#align list.foldr_eta List.foldr_eta
@[simp]
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
rw [← foldr_reverse]; simp only [foldr_self_append, append_nil, reverse_reverse]
#align list.reverse_foldl List.reverse_foldl
#align list.foldl_map List.foldl_map
#align list.foldr_map List.foldr_map
theorem foldl_map' {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β) (a : α) (l : List α)
(h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
List.foldl f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (List.foldl f a l) := by
induction l generalizing a
· simp
· simp [*, h]
#align list.foldl_map' List.foldl_map'
theorem foldr_map' {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β) (a : α) (l : List α)
(h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
List.foldr f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (List.foldr f a l) := by
induction l generalizing a
· simp
· simp [*, h]
#align list.foldr_map' List.foldr_map'
#align list.foldl_hom List.foldl_hom
#align list.foldr_hom List.foldr_hom
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
#align list.foldl_hom₂ List.foldl_hom₂
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
#align list.foldr_hom₂ List.foldr_hom₂
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction' l with lh lt l_ih generalizing f
· exact hf
· apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
#align list.injective_foldl_comp List.injective_foldl_comp
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldr`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : α → β → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldrRecOn {C : β → Sort*} (l : List α) (op : α → β → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ l, C (op a b)) : C (foldr op b l) := by
induction l with
| nil => exact hb
| cons hd tl IH =>
refine hl _ ?_ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)
refine IH ?_
intro y hy x hx
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx)
#align list.foldr_rec_on List.foldrRecOn
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldl`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : β → α → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldlRecOn {C : β → Sort*} (l : List α) (op : β → α → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ l, C (op b a)) : C (foldl op b l) := by
induction l generalizing b with
| nil => exact hb
| cons hd tl IH =>
refine IH _ ?_ ?_
· exact hl b hb hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)
· intro y hy x hx
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx)
#align list.foldl_rec_on List.foldlRecOn
@[simp]
theorem foldrRecOn_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldrRecOn [] op b hb hl = hb :=
rfl
#align list.foldr_rec_on_nil List.foldrRecOn_nil
@[simp]
theorem foldrRecOn_cons {C : β → Sort*} (x : α) (l : List α) (op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ x :: l, C (op a b)) :
foldrRecOn (x :: l) op b hb hl =
hl _ (foldrRecOn l op b hb fun b hb a ha => hl b hb a (mem_cons_of_mem _ ha)) x
(mem_cons_self _ _) :=
rfl
#align list.foldr_rec_on_cons List.foldrRecOn_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldlRecOn_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : β → α → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldlRecOn [] op b hb hl = hb :=
rfl
#align list.foldl_rec_on_nil List.foldlRecOn_nil
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section Scanl
variable {f : β → α → β} {b : β} {a : α} {l : List α}
theorem length_scanl : ∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a, [] => rfl
| a, x :: l => by
rw [scanl, length_cons, length_cons, ← succ_eq_add_one, congr_arg succ]
exact length_scanl _ _
#align list.length_scanl List.length_scanl
@[simp]
theorem scanl_nil (b : β) : scanl f b nil = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.scanl_nil List.scanl_nil
@[simp]
theorem scanl_cons : scanl f b (a :: l) = [b] ++ scanl f (f b a) l := by
simp only [scanl, eq_self_iff_true, singleton_append, and_self_iff]
#align list.scanl_cons List.scanl_cons
@[simp]
theorem get?_zero_scanl : (scanl f b l).get? 0 = some b := by
cases l
· simp only [get?, scanl_nil]
· simp only [get?, scanl_cons, singleton_append]
#align list.nth_zero_scanl List.get?_zero_scanl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} : (scanl f b l).get ⟨0, h⟩ = b := by
cases l
· simp only [get, scanl_nil]
· simp only [get, scanl_cons, singleton_append]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp, deprecated get_zero_scanl (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} : (scanl f b l).nthLe 0 h = b :=
get_zero_scanl
#align list.nth_le_zero_scanl List.nthLe_zero_scanl
theorem get?_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} : (scanl f b l).get? (i + 1) =
((scanl f b l).get? i).bind fun x => (l.get? i).map fun y => f x y := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing b i
· symm
simp only [Option.bind_eq_none', get?, forall₂_true_iff, not_false_iff, Option.map_none',
scanl_nil, Option.not_mem_none, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [scanl_cons, singleton_append]
cases i
· simp only [Option.map_some', get?_zero_scanl, get?, Option.some_bind']
· simp only [hl, get?]
#align list.nth_succ_scanl List.get?_succ_scanl
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem nthLe_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nthLe (i + 1) h =
f ((scanl f b l).nthLe i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt h))
(l.nthLe i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l))))) := by
induction i generalizing b l with
| zero =>
cases l
· simp only [length, zero_eq, lt_self_iff_false] at h
· simp [scanl_cons, singleton_append, nthLe_zero_scanl, nthLe_cons]
| succ i hi =>
cases l
· simp only [length] at h
exact absurd h (by omega)
· simp_rw [scanl_cons]
rw [nthLe_append_right]
· simp only [length, Nat.zero_add 1, succ_add_sub_one, hi]; rfl
· simp only [length_singleton]; omega
#align list.nth_le_succ_scanl List.nthLe_succ_scanl
theorem get_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).get ⟨i + 1, h⟩ =
f ((scanl f b l).get ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt h⟩)
(l.get ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l)))⟩) :=
nthLe_succ_scanl
-- FIXME: we should do the proof the other way around
attribute [deprecated get_succ_scanl (since := "2023-01-05")] nthLe_succ_scanl
end Scanl
-- scanr
@[simp]
theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.scanr_nil List.scanr_nil
#noalign list.scanr_aux_cons
@[simp]
theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
scanr f b (a :: l) = foldr f b (a :: l) :: scanr f b l := by
simp only [scanr, foldr, cons.injEq, and_true]
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih => simp only [foldr, ih]
#align list.scanr_cons List.scanr_cons
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : Commutative f) (hassoc : Associative f)
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| a, b, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw [hassoc]
#align list.foldl1_eq_foldr1 List.foldl1_eq_foldr1
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; rfl
#align list.foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc List.foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
#align list.foldl_eq_foldr List.foldl_eq_foldr
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a, b, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
#align list.foldl_eq_of_comm' List.foldl_eq_of_comm'
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
#align list.foldl_eq_foldr' List.foldl_eq_foldr'
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c))
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a, b, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' ..]; rfl
#align list.foldr_eq_of_comm' List.foldr_eq_of_comm'
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op] [hc : Std.Commutative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂
| [], a₁, a₂ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ =>
calc
((a :: l) <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂) = l <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂ ⋆ a := by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
_ = a₁ ⋆ (a :: l) <*> a₂ := by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
#align list.foldl_assoc List.foldl_assoc
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], a₁, a₂ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
#align list.foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc List.foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
#align list.foldl_assoc_comm_cons List.foldl_assoc_comm_cons
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
#align list.mfoldl_nil List.foldlM_nil
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldr_nil List.foldrM_nil
#align list.mfoldl_cons List.foldlM_cons
/- Porting note: now in std; now assumes an instance of `LawfulMonad m`, so we make everything
`foldrM_eq_foldr` depend on one as well. (An instance of `LawfulMonad m` was already present for
everything following; this just moves it a few lines up.) -/
#align list.mfoldr_cons List.foldrM_cons
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.mfoldr_eq_foldr List.foldrM_eq_foldr
attribute [simp] mapM mapM'
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
#align list.mfoldl_eq_foldl List.foldlM_eq_foldl
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldl_append List.foldlM_append
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldr_append List.foldrM_append
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
#align list.intersperse_nil List.intersperse_nil
@[simp]
theorem intersperse_singleton (a b : α) : intersperse a [b] = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.intersperse_singleton List.intersperse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem intersperse_cons_cons (a b c : α) (tl : List α) :
intersperse a (b :: c :: tl) = b :: a :: intersperse a (c :: tl) :=
rfl
#align list.intersperse_cons_cons List.intersperse_cons_cons
/-! ### splitAt and splitOn -/
section SplitAtOn
/- Porting note: the new version of `splitOnP` uses a `Bool`-valued predicate instead of a
`Prop`-valued one. All downstream definitions have been updated to match. -/
variable (p : α → Bool) (xs ys : List α) (ls : List (List α)) (f : List α → List α)
/- Porting note: this had to be rewritten because of the new implementation of `splitAt`. It's
long in large part because `splitAt.go` (`splitAt`'s auxiliary function) works differently
in the case where n ≥ length l, requiring two separate cases (and two separate inductions). Still,
this can hopefully be golfed. -/
@[simp]
theorem splitAt_eq_take_drop (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : splitAt n l = (take n l, drop n l) := by
by_cases h : n < l.length <;> rw [splitAt, go_eq_take_drop]
· rw [if_pos h]; rfl
· rw [if_neg h, take_all_of_le <| le_of_not_lt h, drop_eq_nil_of_le <| le_of_not_lt h]
where
go_eq_take_drop (n : ℕ) (l xs : List α) (acc : Array α) : splitAt.go l xs n acc =
if n < xs.length then (acc.toList ++ take n xs, drop n xs) else (l, []) := by
split_ifs with h
· induction n generalizing xs acc with
| zero =>
rw [splitAt.go, take, drop, append_nil]
· intros h₁; rw [h₁] at h; contradiction
· intros; contradiction
| succ _ ih =>
cases xs with
| nil => contradiction
| cons hd tl =>
rw [length] at h
rw [splitAt.go, take, drop, append_cons, Array.toList_eq, ← Array.push_data,
← Array.toList_eq]
exact ih _ _ <| (by omega)
· induction n generalizing xs acc with
| zero =>
replace h : xs.length = 0 := by omega
rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h, splitAt.go]
| succ _ ih =>
cases xs with
| nil => rw [splitAt.go]
| cons hd tl =>
rw [length] at h
rw [splitAt.go]
exact ih _ _ <| not_imp_not.mpr (Nat.add_lt_add_right · 1) h
#align list.split_at_eq_take_drop List.splitAt_eq_take_drop
@[simp]
theorem splitOn_nil [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : [].splitOn a = [[]] :=
rfl
#align list.split_on_nil List.splitOn_nil
@[simp]
theorem splitOnP_nil : [].splitOnP p = [[]] :=
rfl
#align list.split_on_p_nil List.splitOnP_nilₓ
/- Porting note: `split_on_p_aux` and `split_on_p_aux'` were used to prove facts about
`split_on_p`. `splitOnP` has a different structure, and we need different facts about
`splitOnP.go`. Theorems involving `split_on_p_aux` have been omitted where possible. -/
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_ne_nil
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_spec
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux'
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_eq
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_nil
theorem splitOnP.go_ne_nil (xs acc : List α) : splitOnP.go p xs acc ≠ [] := by
induction xs generalizing acc <;> simp [go]; split <;> simp [*]
theorem splitOnP.go_acc (xs acc : List α) :
splitOnP.go p xs acc = modifyHead (acc.reverse ++ ·) (splitOnP p xs) := by
induction xs generalizing acc with
| nil => simp only [go, modifyHead, splitOnP_nil, append_nil]
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [splitOnP, go]; split
· simp only [modifyHead, reverse_nil, append_nil]
· rw [ih [hd], modifyHead_modifyHead, ih]
congr; funext x; simp only [reverse_cons, append_assoc]; rfl
theorem splitOnP_ne_nil (xs : List α) : xs.splitOnP p ≠ [] := splitOnP.go_ne_nil _ _ _
#align list.split_on_p_ne_nil List.splitOnP_ne_nilₓ
@[simp]
theorem splitOnP_cons (x : α) (xs : List α) :
(x :: xs).splitOnP p =
if p x then [] :: xs.splitOnP p else (xs.splitOnP p).modifyHead (cons x) := by
rw [splitOnP, splitOnP.go]; split <;> [rfl; simp [splitOnP.go_acc]]
#align list.split_on_p_cons List.splitOnP_consₓ
/-- The original list `L` can be recovered by joining the lists produced by `splitOnP p L`,
interspersed with the elements `L.filter p`. -/
theorem splitOnP_spec (as : List α) :
join (zipWith (· ++ ·) (splitOnP p as) (((as.filter p).map fun x => [x]) ++ [[]])) = as := by
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as' ih =>
rw [splitOnP_cons, filter]
by_cases h : p a
· rw [if_pos h, h, map, cons_append, zipWith, nil_append, join, cons_append, cons_inj]
exact ih
· rw [if_neg h, eq_false_of_ne_true h, join_zipWith (splitOnP_ne_nil _ _)
(append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ [[]] (cons_ne_nil [] [])), cons_inj]
exact ih
where
join_zipWith {xs ys : List (List α)} {a : α} (hxs : xs ≠ []) (hys : ys ≠ []) :
join (zipWith (fun x x_1 ↦ x ++ x_1) (modifyHead (cons a) xs) ys) =
a :: join (zipWith (fun x x_1 ↦ x ++ x_1) xs ys) := by
cases xs with | nil => contradiction | cons =>
cases ys with | nil => contradiction | cons => rfl
#align list.split_on_p_spec List.splitOnP_specₓ
/-- If no element satisfies `p` in the list `xs`, then `xs.splitOnP p = [xs]` -/
theorem splitOnP_eq_single (h : ∀ x ∈ xs, ¬p x) : xs.splitOnP p = [xs] := by
induction xs with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [splitOnP_cons, h hd (mem_cons_self hd tl), if_neg]
rw [ih <| forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h]
rfl
#align list.split_on_p_eq_single List.splitOnP_eq_singleₓ
/-- When a list of the form `[...xs, sep, ...as]` is split on `p`, the first element is `xs`,
assuming no element in `xs` satisfies `p` but `sep` does satisfy `p` -/
theorem splitOnP_first (h : ∀ x ∈ xs, ¬p x) (sep : α) (hsep : p sep) (as : List α) :
(xs ++ sep :: as).splitOnP p = xs :: as.splitOnP p := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp [hsep]
| cons hd tl ih => simp [h hd _, ih <| forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h]
#align list.split_on_p_first List.splitOnP_firstₓ
/-- `intercalate [x]` is the left inverse of `splitOn x` -/
theorem intercalate_splitOn (x : α) [DecidableEq α] : [x].intercalate (xs.splitOn x) = xs := by
simp only [intercalate, splitOn]
induction' xs with hd tl ih; · simp [join]
cases' h' : splitOnP (· == x) tl with hd' tl'; · exact (splitOnP_ne_nil _ tl h').elim
rw [h'] at ih
rw [splitOnP_cons]
split_ifs with h
· rw [beq_iff_eq] at h
subst h
simp [ih, join, h']
cases tl' <;> simpa [join, h'] using ih
#align list.intercalate_split_on List.intercalate_splitOn
/-- `splitOn x` is the left inverse of `intercalate [x]`, on the domain
consisting of each nonempty list of lists `ls` whose elements do not contain `x` -/
theorem splitOn_intercalate [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (hx : ∀ l ∈ ls, x ∉ l) (hls : ls ≠ []) :
([x].intercalate ls).splitOn x = ls := by
simp only [intercalate]
induction' ls with hd tl ih; · contradiction
cases tl
· suffices hd.splitOn x = [hd] by simpa [join]
refine splitOnP_eq_single _ _ ?_
intro y hy H
rw [eq_of_beq H] at hy
refine hx hd ?_ hy
simp
· simp only [intersperse_cons_cons, singleton_append, join]
specialize ih _ _
· intro l hl
apply hx l
simp only [mem_cons] at hl ⊢
exact Or.inr hl
· exact List.noConfusion
have := splitOnP_first (· == x) hd ?h x (beq_self_eq_true _)
case h =>
intro y hy H
rw [eq_of_beq H] at hy
exact hx hd (.head _) hy
simp only [splitOn] at ih ⊢
rw [this, ih]
#align list.split_on_intercalate List.splitOn_intercalate
end SplitAtOn
/- Porting note: new; here tentatively -/
/-! ### modifyLast -/
section ModifyLast
theorem modifyLast.go_append_one (f : α → α) (a : α) (tl : List α) (r : Array α) :
modifyLast.go f (tl ++ [a]) r = (r.toListAppend <| modifyLast.go f (tl ++ [a]) #[]) := by
cases tl with
| nil =>
simp only [nil_append, modifyLast.go]; rfl
| cons hd tl =>
simp only [cons_append]
rw [modifyLast.go, modifyLast.go]
case x_3 | x_3 => exact append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right tl [a] (cons_ne_nil a [])
rw [modifyLast.go_append_one _ _ tl _, modifyLast.go_append_one _ _ tl (Array.push #[] hd)]
simp only [Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.push_data, Array.data_toArray, nil_append, append_assoc]
theorem modifyLast_append_one (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
modifyLast f (l ++ [a]) = l ++ [f a] := by
cases l with
| nil =>
simp only [nil_append, modifyLast, modifyLast.go, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.data_toArray]
| cons _ tl =>
simp only [cons_append, modifyLast]
rw [modifyLast.go]
case x_3 => exact append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right tl [a] (cons_ne_nil a [])
rw [modifyLast.go_append_one, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.push_data, Array.data_toArray,
nil_append, cons_append, nil_append, cons_inj]
exact modifyLast_append_one _ _ tl
theorem modifyLast_append (f : α → α) (l₁ l₂ : List α) (_ : l₂ ≠ []) :
modifyLast f (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyLast f l₂ := by
cases l₂ with
| nil => contradiction
| cons hd tl =>
cases tl with
| nil => exact modifyLast_append_one _ hd _
| cons hd' tl' =>
rw [append_cons, ← nil_append (hd :: hd' :: tl'), append_cons [], nil_append,
modifyLast_append _ (l₁ ++ [hd]) (hd' :: tl') _, modifyLast_append _ [hd] (hd' :: tl') _,
append_assoc]
all_goals { exact cons_ne_nil _ _ }
end ModifyLast
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
#align list.pmap List.pmap
#align list.attach List.attach
@[simp] lemma attach_nil : ([] : List α).attach = [] := rfl
#align list.attach_nil List.attach_nil
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction' l with h t ih <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
#align list.sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : List α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (fun a _ => f a) l H = map f l := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, pmap, map]]
#align list.pmap_eq_map List.pmap_eq_map
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {g : ∀ a, q a → β} (l : List α) {H₁ H₂}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ (h₁ h₂), f a h₁ = g a h₂) : pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ := by
induction' l with _ _ ih
· rfl
· rw [pmap, pmap, h _ (mem_cons_self _ _), ih fun a ha => h a (mem_cons_of_mem _ ha)]
#align list.pmap_congr List.pmap_congr
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l H) :
map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (fun a h => g (f a h)) l H := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, pmap, map]]
#align list.map_pmap List.map_pmap
theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (g : ∀ b, p b → γ) (f : α → β) (l H) :
pmap g (map f l) H = pmap (fun a h => g (f a) h) l fun a h => H _ (mem_map_of_mem _ h) := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, pmap, map]]
#align list.pmap_map List.pmap_map
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l H) :
pmap f l H = l.attach.map fun x => f x.1 (H _ x.2) := by
rw [attach, attachWith, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l fun _ _ _ _ => rfl
#align list.pmap_eq_map_attach List.pmap_eq_map_attach
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10959): lean 4 simp can't rewrite with this
theorem attach_map_coe' (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
(l.attach.map fun (i : {i // i ∈ l}) => f i) = l.map f := by
rw [attach, attachWith, map_pmap]; exact pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _
#align list.attach_map_coe' List.attach_map_coe'
theorem attach_map_val' (l : List α) (f : α → β) : (l.attach.map fun i => f i.val) = l.map f :=
attach_map_coe' _ _
#align list.attach_map_val' List.attach_map_val'
@[simp]
theorem attach_map_val (l : List α) : l.attach.map Subtype.val = l :=
(attach_map_coe' _ _).trans l.map_id
-- Porting note: coe is expanded eagerly, so "attach_map_coe" would have the same syntactic form.
#align list.attach_map_coe List.attach_map_val
#align list.attach_map_val List.attach_map_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_attach (l : List α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach
| ⟨a, h⟩ => by
have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val] <;> exact h)
rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩
exact m
#align list.mem_attach List.mem_attach
@[simp]
theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l H b} :
b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b := by
simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and_iff, Subtype.exists, eq_comm]
#align list.mem_pmap List.mem_pmap
@[simp]
theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, pmap, length]]
#align list.length_pmap List.length_pmap
@[simp]
theorem length_attach (L : List α) : L.attach.length = L.length :=
length_pmap
#align list.length_attach List.length_attach
@[simp]
theorem pmap_eq_nil {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l H} : pmap f l H = [] ↔ l = [] := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_pmap, length_eq_zero]
#align list.pmap_eq_nil List.pmap_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_nil (l : List α) : l.attach = [] ↔ l = [] :=
pmap_eq_nil
#align list.attach_eq_nil List.attach_eq_nil
theorem getLast_pmap (p : α → Prop) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l : List α)
(hl₁ : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (hl₂ : l ≠ []) :
(l.pmap f hl₁).getLast (mt List.pmap_eq_nil.1 hl₂) =
f (l.getLast hl₂) (hl₁ _ (List.getLast_mem hl₂)) := by
induction' l with l_hd l_tl l_ih
· apply (hl₂ rfl).elim
· by_cases hl_tl : l_tl = []
· simp [hl_tl]
· simp only [pmap]
rw [getLast_cons, l_ih _ hl_tl]
simp only [getLast_cons hl_tl]
#align list.last_pmap List.getLast_pmap
theorem get?_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (n : ℕ) :
get? (pmap f l h) n = Option.pmap f (get? l n) fun x H => h x (get?_mem H) := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing n
· simp
· cases' n with n
· simp
· simp [hl]
#align list.nth_pmap List.get?_pmap
theorem get_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
get (pmap f l h) ⟨n, hn⟩ =
f (get l ⟨n, @length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn⟩)
(h _ (get_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing n
· simp only [length, pmap] at hn
exact absurd hn (not_lt_of_le n.zero_le)
· cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated get_pmap (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
nthLe (pmap f l h) n hn =
f (nthLe l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))
(h _ (get_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) :=
get_pmap ..
#align list.nth_le_pmap List.nthLe_pmap
theorem pmap_append {p : ι → Prop} (f : ∀ a : ι, p a → α) (l₁ l₂ : List ι)
(h : ∀ a ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p a) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).pmap f h =
(l₁.pmap f fun a ha => h a (mem_append_left l₂ ha)) ++
l₂.pmap f fun a ha => h a (mem_append_right l₁ ha) := by
induction' l₁ with _ _ ih
· rfl
· dsimp only [pmap, cons_append]
rw [ih]
#align list.pmap_append List.pmap_append
theorem pmap_append' {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a : α, p a → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α)
(h₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a) (h₂ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, p a) :
((l₁ ++ l₂).pmap f fun a ha => (List.mem_append.1 ha).elim (h₁ a) (h₂ a)) =
l₁.pmap f h₁ ++ l₂.pmap f h₂ :=
pmap_append f l₁ l₂ _
#align list.pmap_append' List.pmap_append'
/-! ### find -/
section find?
variable {p : α → Bool} {l : List α} {a : α}
#align list.find_nil List.find?_nil
-- @[simp]
-- Later porting note (at time of this lemma moving to Batteries):
-- removing attribute `nolint simpNF`
attribute [simp 1100] find?_cons_of_pos
#align list.find_cons_of_pos List.find?_cons_of_pos
-- @[simp]
-- Later porting note (at time of this lemma moving to Batteries):
-- removing attribute `nolint simpNF`
attribute [simp 1100] find?_cons_of_neg
#align list.find_cons_of_neg List.find?_cons_of_neg
attribute [simp] find?_eq_none
#align list.find_eq_none List.find?_eq_none
#align list.find_some List.find?_some
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-05")] alias find?_mem := mem_of_find?_eq_some
#align list.find_mem List.mem_of_find?_eq_some
end find?
/-! ### lookmap -/
section Lookmap
variable (f : α → Option α)
/- Porting note: need a helper theorem for lookmap.go. -/
theorem lookmap.go_append (l : List α) (acc : Array α) :
lookmap.go f l acc = acc.toListAppend (lookmap f l) := by
cases l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl =>
rw [lookmap, go, go]
cases f hd with
| none => simp only [go_append tl _, Array.toListAppend_eq, append_assoc, Array.push_data]; rfl
| some a => rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] :=
rfl
#align list.lookmap_nil List.lookmap_nil
@[simp]
theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : List α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f := by
simp only [lookmap, lookmap.go, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.data_toArray, nil_append]
rw [lookmap.go_append, h]; rfl
#align list.lookmap_cons_none List.lookmap_cons_none
@[simp]
theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : List α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l := by
simp only [lookmap, lookmap.go, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.data_toArray, nil_append]
rw [h]
#align list.lookmap_cons_some List.lookmap_cons_some
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : List α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] => rfl
| _ :: _ => rfl
#align list.lookmap_some List.lookmap_some
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : List α, (l.lookmap fun _ => none) = l
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => (lookmap_cons_none _ l rfl).trans (congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l))
#align list.lookmap_none List.lookmap_none
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → Option α} :
∀ {l : List α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: l, H => by
cases' forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂
cases' h : g a with b
· simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂]
· simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)]
#align list.lookmap_congr List.lookmap_congr
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
#align list.lookmap_of_forall_not List.lookmap_of_forall_not
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ (a), ∀ b ∈ f a, g a = g b) :
∀ l : List α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by
cases' h' : f a with b
· simpa [h'] using lookmap_map_eq _ h l
· simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h']
#align list.lookmap_map_eq List.lookmap_map_eq
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ (a), ∀ b ∈ f a, a = b) (l : List α) : l.lookmap f = l := by
rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
#align list.lookmap_id' List.lookmap_id'
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 2,757 | 2,758 | theorem length_lookmap (l : List α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l := by |
rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ fun _ => (), length_map]; simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Complex
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DivergenceTheorem
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.CircleIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Dslope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.ReImTopology
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.DiffContOnCl
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Cardinality
#align_import analysis.complex.cauchy_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Cauchy integral formula
In this file we prove the Cauchy-Goursat theorem and the Cauchy integral formula for integrals over
circles. Most results are formulated for a function `f : ℂ → E` that takes values in a complex
Banach space with second countable topology.
## Main statements
In the following theorems, if the name ends with `off_countable`, then the actual theorem assumes
differentiability at all but countably many points of the set mentioned below.
* `Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable`: If a function
`f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle and *real* differentiable on its interior, then
its integral over the boundary of this rectangle is equal to the integral of
`I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I` over the rectangle, where `f' z w : E` is the derivative
of `f` at `z` in the direction `w` and `I = Complex.I` is the imaginary unit.
* `Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`: If a function
`f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle and is *complex* differentiable on its interior,
then its integral over the boundary of this rectangle is equal to zero.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable`: If a
function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed annulus `{z | r ≤ |z - c| ≤ R}` and is complex
differentiable on its interior `{z | r < |z - c| < R}`, then the integrals of `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z`
over the outer boundary and over the inner boundary are equal.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto`,
`Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`:
If a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a punctured closed disc `{z | |z - c| ≤ R ∧ z ≠ c}`, is
complex differentiable on the corresponding punctured open disc, and tends to `y` as `z → c`,
`z ≠ c`, then the integral of `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` over the circle `|z - c| = R` is equal to
`2πiy`. In particular, if `f` is continuous on the whole closed disc and is complex differentiable
on the corresponding open disc, then this integral is equal to `2πif(c)`.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`,
`Complex.two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`
**Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disc of radius `R` and is
complex differentiable on the corresponding open disc, then for any `w` in the corresponding open
disc the integral of `(z - w)⁻¹ • f z` over the boundary of the disc is equal to `2πif(w)`.
Two versions of the lemma put the multiplier `2πi` at the different sides of the equality.
* `Complex.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_of_differentiable_off_countable`: If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous
on a closed disc of positive radius and is complex differentiable on the corresponding open disc,
then it is analytic on the corresponding open disc, and the coefficients of the power series are
given by Cauchy integral formulas.
* `DifferentiableOn.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`: If `f : ℂ → E` is complex differentiable on a
closed disc of positive radius, then it is analytic on the corresponding open disc, and the
coefficients of the power series are given by Cauchy integral formulas.
* `DifferentiableOn.analyticAt`, `Differentiable.analyticAt`: If `f : ℂ → E` is differentiable
on a neighborhood of a point, then it is analytic at this point. In particular, if `f : ℂ → E`
is differentiable on the whole `ℂ`, then it is analytic at every point `z : ℂ`.
* `Differentiable.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`: If `f : ℂ → E` is differentiable everywhere then the
`cauchyPowerSeries f z R` is a formal power series representing `f` at `z` with infinite
radius of convergence (this holds for any choice of `0 < R`).
## Implementation details
The proof of the Cauchy integral formula in this file is based on a very general version of the
divergence theorem, see `MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable`
(a version for functions defined on `Fin (n + 1) → ℝ`),
`MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_prod_Icc_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable_of_le`, and
`MeasureTheory.integral2_divergence_prod_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable` (versions for
functions defined on `ℝ × ℝ`).
Usually, the divergence theorem is formulated for a $C^1$ smooth function. The theorems formulated
above deal with a function that is
* continuous on a closed box/rectangle;
* differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior;
* have divergence integrable over the closed box/rectangle.
First, we reformulate the theorem for a *real*-differentiable map `ℂ → E`, and relate the integral
of `f` over the boundary of a rectangle in `ℂ` to the integral of the derivative
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ over the interior of this box. In particular, for a *complex*
differentiable function, the latter derivative is zero, hence the integral over the boundary of a
rectangle is zero. Thus we get the Cauchy-Goursat theorem for a rectangle in `ℂ`.
Next, we apply this theorem to the function $F(z)=f(c+e^{z})$ on the rectangle
$[\ln r, \ln R]\times [0, 2\pi]$ to prove that
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=r}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}=\oint_{|z-c|=R}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}
$$
provided that `f` is continuous on the closed annulus `r ≤ |z - c| ≤ R` and is complex
differentiable on its interior `r < |z - c| < R` (possibly, at all but countably many points).
Here and below, we write $\frac{f(z)}{z-c}$ in the documentation while the actual lemmas use
`(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` because `f z` belongs to some Banach space over `ℂ` and `f z / (z - c)` is
undefined.
Taking the limit of this equality as `r` tends to `𝓝[>] 0`, we prove
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}=2\pi if(c)
$$
provided that `f` is continuous on the closed disc `|z - c| ≤ R` and is differentiable at all but
countably many points of its interior. This is the Cauchy integral formula for the center of a
circle. In particular, if we apply this function to `F z = (z - c) • f z`, then we get
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R} f(z)\,dz=0.
$$
In order to deduce the Cauchy integral formula for any point `w`, `|w - c| < R`, we consider the
slope function `g : ℂ → E` given by `g z = (z - w)⁻¹ • (f z - f w)` if `z ≠ w` and `g w = f' w`.
This function satisfies assumptions of the previous theorem, so we have
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-w}=\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{f(w)\,dz}{z-w}=
\left(\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{dz}{z-w}\right)f(w).
$$
The latter integral was computed in `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball` and is equal to
`2 * π * Complex.I`.
There is one more step in the actual proof. Since we allow `f` to be non-differentiable on a
countable set `s`, we cannot immediately claim that `g` is continuous at `w` if `w ∈ s`. So, we use
the proof outlined in the previous paragraph for `w ∉ s` (see
`Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux`), then use continuity
of both sides of the formula and density of `sᶜ` to prove the formula for all points of the open
ball, see `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`.
Finally, we use the properties of the Cauchy integrals established elsewhere (see
`hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`) and Cauchy integral formula to prove that the original
function is analytic on the open ball.
## Tags
Cauchy-Goursat theorem, Cauchy integral formula
-/
open TopologicalSpace Set MeasureTheory intervalIntegral Metric Filter Function
open scoped Interval Real NNReal ENNReal Topology
noncomputable section
universe u
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]
namespace Complex
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle with opposite corners at
`z w : ℂ`, is *real* differentiable at all but countably many points of the corresponding open
rectangle, and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then the
integral of `f` over the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable (f : ℂ → E) (f' : ℂ → ℂ →L[ℝ] E)
(z w : ℂ) (s : Set ℂ) (hs : s.Countable)
(Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im) \ s,
HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • f' z 1 - f' z I) ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I := by
set e : (ℝ × ℝ) ≃L[ℝ] ℂ := equivRealProdCLM.symm
have he : ∀ x y : ℝ, ↑x + ↑y * I = e (x, y) := fun x y => (mk_eq_add_mul_I x y).symm
have he₁ : e (1, 0) = 1 := rfl; have he₂ : e (0, 1) = I := rfl
simp only [he] at *
set F : ℝ × ℝ → E := f ∘ e
set F' : ℝ × ℝ → ℝ × ℝ →L[ℝ] E := fun p => (f' (e p)).comp (e : ℝ × ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ)
have hF' : ∀ p : ℝ × ℝ, (-(I • F' p)) (1, 0) + F' p (0, 1) = -(I • f' (e p) 1 - f' (e p) I) := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [F', ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, he₁, he₂, neg_add_eq_sub,
neg_sub]
set R : Set (ℝ × ℝ) := [[z.re, w.re]] ×ˢ [[w.im, z.im]]
set t : Set (ℝ × ℝ) := e ⁻¹' s
rw [uIcc_comm z.im] at Hc Hi; rw [min_comm z.im, max_comm z.im] at Hd
have hR : e ⁻¹' ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[w.im, z.im]]) = R := rfl
have htc : ContinuousOn F R := Hc.comp e.continuousOn hR.ge
have htd :
∀ p ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ˢ Ioo (min w.im z.im) (max w.im z.im) \ t,
HasFDerivAt F (F' p) p :=
fun p hp => (Hd (e p) hp).comp p e.hasFDerivAt
simp_rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_smul, intervalIntegral.integral_symm w.im z.im, ←
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, ← hF']
refine (integral2_divergence_prod_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable (fun p => -(I • F p)) F
(fun p => -(I • F' p)) F' z.re w.im w.re z.im t (hs.preimage e.injective)
(htc.const_smul _).neg htc (fun p hp => ((htd p hp).const_smul I).neg) htd ?_).symm
rw [← (volume_preserving_equiv_real_prod.symm _).integrableOn_comp_preimage
(MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)] at Hi
simpa only [hF'] using Hi.neg
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_has_fderiv_at_real_off_countable Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle with opposite corners at
`z w : ℂ`, is *real* differentiable on the corresponding open rectangle, and
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then the integral of `f` over
the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_continuousOn_of_hasFDerivAt_real (f : ℂ → E) (f' : ℂ → ℂ →L[ℝ] E)
(z w : ℂ) (Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im),
HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • f' z 1 - f' z I) ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I :=
integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f f' z w ∅ countable_empty Hc
(fun x hx => Hd x hx.1) Hi
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_continuous_on_of_has_fderiv_at_real Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_continuousOn_of_hasFDerivAt_real
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is *real* differentiable on a closed rectangle with opposite
corners at `z w : ℂ` and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then
the integral of `f` over the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiableOn_real (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(Hd : DifferentiableOn ℝ f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • fderiv ℝ f z 1 - fderiv ℝ f z I)
([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im,
I • fderiv ℝ f (x + y * I) 1 - fderiv ℝ f (x + y * I) I :=
integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f (fderiv ℝ f) z w ∅ countable_empty
Hd.continuousOn
(fun x hx => Hd.hasFDerivAt <| by
simpa only [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, interior_reProdIm, uIcc, interior_Icc] using hx.1)
Hi
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiable_on_real Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiableOn_real
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for a rectangle: the integral of a complex differentiable function
over the boundary of a rectangle equals zero. More precisely, if `f` is continuous on a closed
rectangle and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of the corresponding open
rectangle, then its integral over the boundary of the rectangle equals zero. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(s : Set ℂ) (hs : s.Countable) (Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im) \ s,
DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 := by
refine (integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f
(fun z => (fderiv ℂ f z).restrictScalars ℝ) z w s hs Hc
(fun x hx => (Hd x hx).hasFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ) ?_).trans ?_ <;>
simp [← ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem for a rectangle**: the integral of a complex differentiable function
over the boundary of a rectangle equals zero. More precisely, if `f` is continuous on a closed
rectangle and is complex differentiable on the corresponding open rectangle, then its integral over
the boundary of the rectangle equals zero. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuousOn_of_differentiableOn (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f
(Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im))) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 :=
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable f z w ∅ countable_empty Hc
fun _x hx => Hd.differentiableAt <| (isOpen_Ioo.reProdIm isOpen_Ioo).mem_nhds hx.1
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuous_on_of_differentiable_on Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuousOn_of_differentiableOn
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for a rectangle: the integral of a complex differentiable function
over the boundary of a rectangle equals zero. More precisely, if `f` is complex differentiable on a
closed rectangle, then its integral over the boundary of the rectangle equals zero. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(H : DifferentiableOn ℂ f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 :=
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuousOn_of_differentiableOn f z w H.continuousOn <|
H.mono <|
inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) (preimage_mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn
/-- If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on the closed annulus `r ≤ ‖z - c‖ ≤ R`, `0 < r ≤ R`,
and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior,
then the integrals of `f z / (z - c)` (formally, `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z`)
over the circles `‖z - c‖ = r` and `‖z - c‖ = R` are equal to each other. -/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable {c : ℂ}
{r R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (hle : r ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ ball c r))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ closedBall c r) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z := by
/- We apply the previous lemma to `fun z ↦ f (c + exp z)` on the rectangle
`[log r, log R] × [0, 2 * π]`. -/
set A := closedBall c R \ ball c r
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ a, Real.exp a = r := ⟨Real.log r, Real.exp_log h0⟩
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, Real.exp b = R := ⟨Real.log R, Real.exp_log (h0.trans_le hle)⟩
rw [Real.exp_le_exp] at hle
-- Unfold definition of `circleIntegral` and cancel some terms.
suffices
(∫ θ in (0)..2 * π, I • f (circleMap c (Real.exp b) θ)) =
∫ θ in (0)..2 * π, I • f (circleMap c (Real.exp a) θ) by
simpa only [circleIntegral, add_sub_cancel_left, ofReal_exp, ← exp_add, smul_smul, ←
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (circleMap_ne_center (Real.exp_pos _).ne'),
circleMap_sub_center, deriv_circleMap]
set R := [[a, b]] ×ℂ [[0, 2 * π]]
set g : ℂ → ℂ := (c + exp ·)
have hdg : Differentiable ℂ g := differentiable_exp.const_add _
replace hs : (g ⁻¹' s).Countable := (hs.preimage (add_right_injective c)).preimage_cexp
have h_maps : MapsTo g R A := by rintro z ⟨h, -⟩; simpa [g, A, dist_eq, abs_exp, hle] using h.symm
replace hc : ContinuousOn (f ∘ g) R := hc.comp hdg.continuous.continuousOn h_maps
replace hd : ∀ z ∈ Ioo (min a b) (max a b) ×ℂ Ioo (min 0 (2 * π)) (max 0 (2 * π)) \ g ⁻¹' s,
DifferentiableAt ℂ (f ∘ g) z := by
refine fun z hz => (hd (g z) ⟨?_, hz.2⟩).comp z (hdg _)
simpa [g, dist_eq, abs_exp, hle, and_comm] using hz.1.1
simpa [g, circleMap, exp_periodic _, sub_eq_zero, ← exp_add] using
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable _ ⟨a, 0⟩ ⟨b, 2 * π⟩ _ hs hc hd
#align complex.circle_integral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for an annulus. If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on the closed annulus
`r ≤ ‖z - c‖ ≤ R`, `0 < r ≤ R`, and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of
its interior, then the integrals of `f` over the circles `‖z - c‖ = r` and `‖z - c‖ = R` are equal
to each other. -/
theorem circleIntegral_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable {c : ℂ} {r R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r)
(hle : r ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ ball c r))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ closedBall c r) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, r), f z :=
calc
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable h0 hle hs
((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).smul hc) fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_id.sub_const _).smul (hd z hz))
_ = ∮ z in C(c, r), f z := circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _
#align complex.circle_integral_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable Complex.circleIntegral_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable
/-- **Cauchy integral formula** for the value at the center of a disc. If `f` is continuous on a
punctured closed disc of radius `R`, is differentiable at all but countably many points of the
interior of this disc, and has a limit `y` at the center of the disc, then the integral
$\oint_{‖z-c‖=R} \frac{f(z)}{z-c}\,dz$ is equal to `2πiy`. -/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto {c : ℂ}
{R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < R) {f : ℂ → E} {y : E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ {c}))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ {c}) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) (hy : Tendsto f (𝓝[{c}ᶜ] c) (𝓝 y)) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
refine le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun ε ε0 => ?_
obtain ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ z ∈ closedBall c δ \ {c}, dist (f z) y < ε / (2 * π) :=
((nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_closedBall _).tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).1 hy _
(div_pos ε0 Real.two_pi_pos)
obtain ⟨r, hr0, hrδ, hrR⟩ : ∃ r, 0 < r ∧ r ≤ δ ∧ r ≤ R :=
⟨min δ R, lt_min δ0 h0, min_le_left _ _, min_le_right _ _⟩
have hsub : closedBall c R \ ball c r ⊆ closedBall c R \ {c} :=
diff_subset_diff_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_ball_self hr0)
have hsub' : ball c R \ closedBall c r ⊆ ball c R \ {c} :=
diff_subset_diff_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_closedBall_self hr0.le)
have hzne : ∀ z ∈ sphere c r, z ≠ c := fun z hz =>
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hz fun h => hr0.ne' <| dist_self c ▸ Eq.symm h
/- The integral `∮ z in C(c, r), f z / (z - c)` does not depend on `0 < r ≤ R` and tends to
`2πIy` as `r → 0`. -/
calc
‖(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) - (2 * ↑π * I) • y‖ =
‖(∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) - ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • y‖ := by
congr 2
· exact circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable hr0
hrR hs (hc.mono hsub) fun z hz => hd z ⟨hsub' hz.1, hz.2⟩
· simp [hr0.ne']
_ = ‖∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • (f z - y)‖ := by
simp only [smul_sub]
have hc' : ContinuousOn (fun z => (z - c)⁻¹) (sphere c r) :=
(continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).inv₀ fun z hz => sub_ne_zero.2 <| hzne _ hz
rw [circleIntegral.integral_sub] <;> refine (hc'.smul ?_).circleIntegrable hr0.le
· exact hc.mono <| subset_inter
(sphere_subset_closedBall.trans <| closedBall_subset_closedBall hrR) hzne
· exact continuousOn_const
_ ≤ 2 * π * r * (r⁻¹ * (ε / (2 * π))) := by
refine circleIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const hr0.le fun z hz => ?_
specialize hzne z hz
rw [mem_sphere, dist_eq_norm] at hz
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, hz, ← dist_eq_norm]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hδ _ ⟨?_, hzne⟩).le (inv_nonneg.2 hr0.le)
rwa [mem_closedBall_iff_norm, hz]
_ = ε := by field_simp [hr0.ne', Real.two_pi_pos.ne']; ac_rfl
#align complex.circle_integral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto
/-- **Cauchy integral formula** for the value at the center of a disc. If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous
on a closed disc of radius `R` and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its
interior, then the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{f(z)}{z-c}\,dz$ is equal to `2πiy`. -/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < R)
{f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f c :=
circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto h0 hs
(hc.mono diff_subset) (fun z hz => hd z ⟨hz.1.1, hz.2⟩)
(hc.continuousAt <| closedBall_mem_nhds _ h0).continuousWithinAt
#align complex.circle_integral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for a disk: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disk
`{z | ‖z - c‖ ≤ R}` and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior,
then the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=R}f(z)\,dz$ equals zero. -/
theorem circleIntegral_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E}
{c : ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) : (∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = 0 := by
rcases h0.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h0); · apply circleIntegral.integral_radius_zero
calc
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _).symm
_ = (2 * ↑π * I : ℂ) • (c - c) • f c :=
(circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable h0 hs
((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).smul hc) fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_id.sub_const _).smul (hd z hz))
_ = 0 := by rw [sub_self, zero_smul, smul_zero]
#align complex.circle_integral_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable Complex.circleIntegral_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
/-- An auxiliary lemma for
`Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`. This lemma assumes
`w ∉ s` while the main lemma drops this assumption. -/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux {R : ℝ} {c w : ℂ}
{f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hw : w ∈ ball c R \ s)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R)) (hd : ∀ x ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f w := by
have hR : 0 < R := dist_nonneg.trans_lt hw.1
set F : ℂ → E := dslope f w
have hws : (insert w s).Countable := hs.insert w
have hcF : ContinuousOn F (closedBall c R) :=
(continuousOn_dslope <| closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem hw.1).2 ⟨hc, hd _ hw⟩
have hdF : ∀ z ∈ ball (c : ℂ) R \ insert w s, DifferentiableAt ℂ F z := fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_dslope_of_ne (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem (mem_insert _ _) hz.2).symm).2
(hd _ (diff_subset_diff_right (subset_insert _ _) hz))
have HI := circleIntegral_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable hR.le hws hcF hdF
have hne : ∀ z ∈ sphere c R, z ≠ w := fun z hz => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hz (ne_of_lt hw.1)
have hFeq : EqOn F (fun z => (z - w)⁻¹ • f z - (z - w)⁻¹ • f w) (sphere c R) := fun z hz ↦
calc
F z = (z - w)⁻¹ • (f z - f w) := update_noteq (hne z hz) _ _
_ = (z - w)⁻¹ • f z - (z - w)⁻¹ • f w := smul_sub _ _ _
have hc' : ContinuousOn (fun z => (z - w)⁻¹) (sphere c R) :=
(continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).inv₀ fun z hz => sub_ne_zero.2 <| hne z hz
rw [← circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball hw.1, ← circleIntegral.integral_smul_const, ←
sub_eq_zero, ← circleIntegral.integral_sub, ← circleIntegral.integral_congr hR.le hFeq, HI]
exacts [(hc'.smul (hc.mono sphere_subset_closedBall)).circleIntegrable hR.le,
(hc'.smul continuousOn_const).circleIntegrable hR.le]
#align complex.circle_integral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux
/-- **Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disc of radius `R` and is
complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior, then for any `w` in this
interior we have $\frac{1}{2πi}\oint_{|z-c|=R}(z-w)^{-1}f(z)\,dz=f(w)$.
-/
theorem two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ}
{c w : ℂ} {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hw : w ∈ ball c R)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R)) (hd : ∀ x ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
((2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) = f w := by
have hR : 0 < R := dist_nonneg.trans_lt hw
suffices w ∈ closure (ball c R \ s) by
lift R to ℝ≥0 using hR.le
have A : ContinuousAt (fun w => (2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) w := by
have := hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral
((hc.mono sphere_subset_closedBall).circleIntegrable R.coe_nonneg) hR
refine this.continuousOn.continuousAt (EMetric.isOpen_ball.mem_nhds ?_)
rwa [Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal]
have B : ContinuousAt f w := hc.continuousAt (closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem hw)
refine tendsto_nhds_unique_of_frequently_eq A B ((mem_closure_iff_frequently.1 this).mono ?_)
intro z hz
rw [circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux hs hz hc hd,
inv_smul_smul₀]
simp [Real.pi_ne_zero, I_ne_zero]
refine mem_closure_iff_nhds.2 fun t ht => ?_
-- TODO: generalize to any vector space over `ℝ`
set g : ℝ → ℂ := fun x => w + ofReal x
have : Tendsto g (𝓝 0) (𝓝 w) :=
(continuous_const.add continuous_ofReal).tendsto' 0 w (add_zero _)
rcases mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.1 (this <| inter_mem ht <| isOpen_ball.mem_nhds hw) with
⟨l, u, hlu₀, hlu_sub⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : (Ioo l u \ g ⁻¹' s).Nonempty := by
refine nonempty_diff.2 fun hsub => ?_
have : (Ioo l u).Countable :=
(hs.preimage ((add_right_injective w).comp ofReal_injective)).mono hsub
rw [← Cardinal.le_aleph0_iff_set_countable, Cardinal.mk_Ioo_real (hlu₀.1.trans hlu₀.2)] at this
exact this.not_lt Cardinal.aleph0_lt_continuum
exact ⟨g x, (hlu_sub hx.1).1, (hlu_sub hx.1).2, hx.2⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.two_pi_I_inv_smul_circle_integral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable Complex.two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
/-- **Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disc of radius `R` and is
complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior, then for any `w` in this
interior we have $\oint_{|z-c|=R}(z-w)^{-1}f(z)\,dz=2πif(w)$.
-/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ} {c w : ℂ} {f : ℂ → E}
{s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hw : w ∈ ball c R) (hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R))
(hd : ∀ x ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f w := by
rw [← two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
hs hw hc hd, smul_inv_smul₀]
simp [Real.pi_ne_zero, I_ne_zero]
#align complex.circle_integral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
/-- **Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is complex differentiable on an open disc and is
continuous on its closure, then for any `w` in this open ball we have
$\oint_{|z-c|=R}(z-w)^{-1}f(z)\,dz=2πif(w)$. -/
theorem _root_.DiffContOnCl.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul {R : ℝ} {c w : ℂ} {f : ℂ → E}
(h : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball c R)) (hw : w ∈ ball c R) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f w :=
circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable countable_empty hw
h.continuousOn_ball fun _x hx => h.differentiableAt isOpen_ball hx.1
#align diff_cont_on_cl.circle_integral_sub_inv_smul DiffContOnCl.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul
/-- **Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is complex differentiable on an open disc and is
continuous on its closure, then for any `w` in this open ball we have
$\frac{1}{2πi}\oint_{|z-c|=R}(z-w)^{-1}f(z)\,dz=f(w)$. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/CauchyIntegral.lean | 518 | 525 | theorem _root_.DiffContOnCl.two_pi_i_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul {R : ℝ} {c w : ℂ}
{f : ℂ → E} (hf : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball c R)) (hw : w ∈ ball c R) :
((2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) = f w := by |
have hR : 0 < R := not_le.mp (ball_eq_empty.not.mp (Set.nonempty_of_mem hw).ne_empty)
refine two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
countable_empty hw ?_ ?_
· simpa only [closure_ball c hR.ne.symm] using hf.continuousOn
· simpa only [diff_empty] using fun z hz => hf.differentiableAt isOpen_ball hz
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.nat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file deals with prime numbers: natural numbers `p ≥ 2` whose only divisors are `p` and `1`.
## Important declarations
- `Nat.Prime`: the predicate that expresses that a natural number `p` is prime
- `Nat.Primes`: the subtype of natural numbers that are prime
- `Nat.minFac n`: the minimal prime factor of a natural number `n ≠ 1`
- `Nat.exists_infinite_primes`: Euclid's theorem that there exist infinitely many prime numbers.
This also appears as `Nat.not_bddAbove_setOf_prime` and `Nat.infinite_setOf_prime` (the latter
in `Data.Nat.PrimeFin`).
- `Nat.prime_iff`: `Nat.Prime` coincides with the general definition of `Prime`
- `Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime`: a non-unit natural number is
only divisible by `1` iff it is prime
-/
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- `Nat.Prime p` means that `p` is a prime number, that is, a natural number
at least 2 whose only divisors are `p` and `1`. -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed @[pp_nodot]
def Prime (p : ℕ) :=
Irreducible p
#align nat.prime Nat.Prime
theorem irreducible_iff_nat_prime (a : ℕ) : Irreducible a ↔ Nat.Prime a :=
Iff.rfl
#align irreducible_iff_nat_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime 0
| h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align nat.not_prime_zero Nat.not_prime_zero
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime 1
| h => h.ne_one rfl
#align nat.not_prime_one Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : Prime n) : n ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero h
#align nat.prime.ne_zero Nat.Prime.ne_zero
theorem Prime.pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < p :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.pos Nat.Prime.pos
theorem Prime.two_le : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Prime p → 2 ≤ p
| 0, h => (not_prime_zero h).elim
| 1, h => (not_prime_one h).elim
| _ + 2, _ => le_add_self
#align nat.prime.two_le Nat.Prime.two_le
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p → 1 < p :=
Prime.two_le
#align nat.prime.one_lt Nat.Prime.one_lt
lemma Prime.one_le {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : 1 ≤ p := hp.one_lt.le
instance Prime.one_lt' (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (1 < p) :=
⟨hp.1.one_lt⟩
#align nat.prime.one_lt' Nat.Prime.one_lt'
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : p ≠ 1 :=
hp.one_lt.ne'
#align nat.prime.ne_one Nat.Prime.ne_one
theorem Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (m : ℕ) (hm : m ∣ p) :
m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hm
have := pp.isUnit_or_isUnit hn
rw [Nat.isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff] at this
apply Or.imp_right _ this
rintro rfl
rw [hn, mul_one]
#align nat.prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd
theorem prime_def_lt'' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.two_le, h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
-- Porting note: needed to make ℕ explicit
have h1 := (@one_lt_two ℕ ..).trans_le h.1
refine ⟨mt Nat.isUnit_iff.mp h1.ne', fun a b hab => ?_⟩
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff]
apply Or.imp_right _ (h.2 a _)
· rintro rfl
rw [← mul_right_inj' (pos_of_gt h1).ne', ← hab, mul_one]
· rw [hab]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align nat.prime_def_lt'' Nat.prime_def_lt''
theorem prime_def_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m < p, m ∣ p → m = 1 :=
prime_def_lt''.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨fun h l d => (h d).resolve_right (ne_of_lt l), fun h d =>
(le_of_dvd (le_of_succ_le p2) d).lt_or_eq_dec.imp_left fun l => h l d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt Nat.prime_def_lt
theorem prime_def_lt' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m < p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun m =>
⟨fun h m2 l d => not_lt_of_ge m2 ((h l d).symm ▸ by decide), fun h l d => by
rcases m with (_ | _ | m)
· rw [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd d] at p2
revert p2
decide
· rfl
· exact (h le_add_self l).elim d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt' Nat.prime_def_lt'
theorem prime_def_le_sqrt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ≤ sqrt p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt'.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
⟨fun a m m2 l => a m m2 <| lt_of_le_of_lt l <| sqrt_lt_self p2, fun a =>
have : ∀ {m k : ℕ}, m ≤ k → 1 < m → p ≠ m * k := fun {m k} mk m1 e =>
a m m1 (le_sqrt.2 (e.symm ▸ Nat.mul_le_mul_left m mk)) ⟨k, e⟩
fun m m2 l ⟨k, e⟩ => by
rcases le_total m k with mk | km
· exact this mk m2 e
· rw [mul_comm] at e
refine this km (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ (zero_le m)) e
rwa [one_mul, ← e]⟩
#align nat.prime_def_le_sqrt Nat.prime_def_le_sqrt
theorem prime_of_coprime (n : ℕ) (h1 : 1 < n) (h : ∀ m < n, m ≠ 0 → n.Coprime m) : Prime n := by
refine prime_def_lt.mpr ⟨h1, fun m mlt mdvd => ?_⟩
have hm : m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at mdvd
exact mlt.ne' mdvd
exact (h m mlt hm).symm.eq_one_of_dvd mdvd
#align nat.prime_of_coprime Nat.prime_of_coprime
section
/-- This instance is slower than the instance `decidablePrime` defined below,
but has the advantage that it works in the kernel for small values.
If you need to prove that a particular number is prime, in any case
you should not use `by decide`, but rather `by norm_num`, which is
much faster.
-/
@[local instance]
def decidablePrime1 (p : ℕ) : Decidable (Prime p) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ prime_def_lt'
#align nat.decidable_prime_1 Nat.decidablePrime1
theorem prime_two : Prime 2 := by decide
#align nat.prime_two Nat.prime_two
theorem prime_three : Prime 3 := by decide
#align nat.prime_three Nat.prime_three
theorem prime_five : Prime 5 := by decide
theorem Prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h_two : p ≠ 2)
(h_three : p ≠ 3) : 5 ≤ p := by
by_contra! h
revert h_two h_three hp
-- Porting note (#11043): was `decide!`
match p with
| 0 => decide
| 1 => decide
| 2 => decide
| 3 => decide
| 4 => decide
| n + 5 => exact (h.not_le le_add_self).elim
#align nat.prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three Nat.Prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three
end
theorem Prime.pred_pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < pred p :=
lt_pred_iff.2 pp.one_lt
#align nat.prime.pred_pos Nat.Prime.pred_pos
theorem succ_pred_prime {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : succ (pred p) = p :=
succ_pred_eq_of_pos pp.pos
#align nat.succ_pred_prime Nat.succ_pred_prime
theorem dvd_prime {p m : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : m ∣ p ↔ m = 1 ∨ m = p :=
⟨fun d => pp.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd m d, fun h =>
h.elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ one_dvd _) fun e => e.symm ▸ dvd_rfl⟩
#align nat.dvd_prime Nat.dvd_prime
theorem dvd_prime_two_le {p m : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (H : 2 ≤ m) : m ∣ p ↔ m = p :=
(dvd_prime pp).trans <| or_iff_right_of_imp <| Not.elim <| ne_of_gt H
#align nat.dvd_prime_two_le Nat.dvd_prime_two_le
theorem prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq {p q : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (qp : q.Prime) : p ∣ q ↔ p = q :=
dvd_prime_two_le qp (Prime.two_le pp)
#align nat.prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq Nat.prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq
theorem Prime.not_dvd_one {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
Irreducible.not_dvd_one pp
#align nat.prime.not_dvd_one Nat.Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem prime_mul_iff {a b : ℕ} : Nat.Prime (a * b) ↔ a.Prime ∧ b = 1 ∨ b.Prime ∧ a = 1 := by
simp only [iff_self_iff, irreducible_mul_iff, ← irreducible_iff_nat_prime, Nat.isUnit_iff]
#align nat.prime_mul_iff Nat.prime_mul_iff
theorem not_prime_mul {a b : ℕ} (a1 : a ≠ 1) (b1 : b ≠ 1) : ¬Prime (a * b) := by
simp [prime_mul_iff, _root_.not_or, *]
#align nat.not_prime_mul Nat.not_prime_mul
theorem not_prime_mul' {a b n : ℕ} (h : a * b = n) (h₁ : a ≠ 1) (h₂ : b ≠ 1) : ¬Prime n :=
h ▸ not_prime_mul h₁ h₂
#align nat.not_prime_mul' Nat.not_prime_mul'
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_eq {p a : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (a1 : a ≠ 1) : a ∣ p ↔ p = a := by
refine ⟨?_, by rintro rfl; rfl⟩
rintro ⟨j, rfl⟩
rcases prime_mul_iff.mp hp with (⟨_, rfl⟩ | ⟨_, rfl⟩)
· exact mul_one _
· exact (a1 rfl).elim
#align nat.prime.dvd_iff_eq Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_eq
section MinFac
theorem minFac_lemma (n k : ℕ) (h : ¬n < k * k) : sqrt n - k < sqrt n + 2 - k :=
(tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right <| le_sqrt.2 <| le_of_not_gt h).2 <| Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (by decide)
#align nat.min_fac_lemma Nat.minFac_lemma
/--
If `n < k * k`, then `minFacAux n k = n`, if `k | n`, then `minFacAux n k = k`.
Otherwise, `minFacAux n k = minFacAux n (k+2)` using well-founded recursion.
If `n` is odd and `1 < n`, then `minFacAux n 3` is the smallest prime factor of `n`.
By default this well-founded recursion would be irreducible.
This prevents use `decide` to resolve `Nat.prime n` for small values of `n`,
so we mark this as `@[semireducible]`.
In future, we may want to remove this annotation and instead use `norm_num` instead of `decide`
in these situations.
-/
@[semireducible] def minFacAux (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| k =>
if n < k * k then n
else
if k ∣ n then k
else
minFacAux n (k + 2)
termination_by k => sqrt n + 2 - k
decreasing_by simp_wf; apply minFac_lemma n k; assumption
#align nat.min_fac_aux Nat.minFacAux
/-- Returns the smallest prime factor of `n ≠ 1`. -/
def minFac (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if 2 ∣ n then 2 else minFacAux n 3
#align nat.min_fac Nat.minFac
@[simp]
theorem minFac_zero : minFac 0 = 2 :=
rfl
#align nat.min_fac_zero Nat.minFac_zero
@[simp]
theorem minFac_one : minFac 1 = 1 := by
simp [minFac, minFacAux]
#align nat.min_fac_one Nat.minFac_one
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Prime.lean | 284 | 285 | theorem minFac_two : minFac 2 = 2 := by |
simp [minFac, minFacAux]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orientation
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Orientation
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.two_dim from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cd8fafa2fac98e1a67097e8a91ad9901cfde48af"
/-!
# Oriented two-dimensional real inner product spaces
This file defines constructions specific to the geometry of an oriented two-dimensional real inner
product space `E`.
## Main declarations
* `Orientation.areaForm`: an antisymmetric bilinear form `E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ` (usual notation `ω`).
Morally, when `ω` is evaluated on two vectors, it gives the oriented area of the parallelogram
they span. (But mathlib does not yet have a construction of oriented area, and in fact the
construction of oriented area should pass through `ω`.)
* `Orientation.rightAngleRotation`: an isometric automorphism `E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E` (usual notation `J`).
This automorphism squares to -1. In a later file, rotations (`Orientation.rotation`) are defined,
in such a way that this automorphism is equal to rotation by 90 degrees.
* `Orientation.basisRightAngleRotation`: for a nonzero vector `x` in `E`, the basis `![x, J x]`
for `E`.
* `Orientation.kahler`: a complex-valued real-bilinear map `E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ`. Its real part is the
inner product and its imaginary part is `Orientation.areaForm`. For vectors `x` and `y` in `E`,
the complex number `o.kahler x y` has modulus `‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. In a later file, oriented angles
(`Orientation.oangle`) are defined, in such a way that the argument of `o.kahler x y` is the
oriented angle from `x` to `y`.
## Main results
* `Orientation.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation`: the identity `J (J x) = - x`
* `Orientation.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay`: `x`, `y` are in the same ray, if
and only if `0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫` and `ω x y = 0`
* `Orientation.kahler_mul`: the identity `o.kahler x a * o.kahler a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * o.kahler x y`
* `Complex.areaForm`, `Complex.rightAngleRotation`, `Complex.kahler`: the concrete
interpretations of `areaForm`, `rightAngleRotation`, `kahler` for the oriented real inner
product space `ℂ`
* `Orientation.areaForm_map_complex`, `Orientation.rightAngleRotation_map_complex`,
`Orientation.kahler_map_complex`: given an orientation-preserving isometry from `E` to `ℂ`,
expressions for `areaForm`, `rightAngleRotation`, `kahler` as the pullback of their concrete
interpretations on `ℂ`
## Implementation notes
Notation `ω` for `Orientation.areaForm` and `J` for `Orientation.rightAngleRotation` should be
defined locally in each file which uses them, since otherwise one would need a more cumbersome
notation which mentions the orientation explicitly (something like `ω[o]`). Write
```
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
```
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
open FiniteDimensional
lemma FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two {K V : Type*} [DivisionRing K]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [Fact (finrank K V = 2)] : FiniteDimensional K V :=
.of_fact_finrank_eq_succ 1
attribute [local instance] FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")]
alias FiniteDimensional.finiteDimensional_of_fact_finrank_eq_two :=
FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [Fact (finrank ℝ E = 2)]
(o : Orientation ℝ E (Fin 2))
namespace Orientation
/-- An antisymmetric bilinear form on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 (usual
notation `ω`). When evaluated on two vectors, it gives the oriented area of the parallelogram they
span. -/
irreducible_def areaForm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := by
let z : E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ ≃ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.symm
let y : E [⋀^Fin 1]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E (E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) ℝ z ∘ₗ AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap
exact y ∘ₗ AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap (R' := ℝ) o.volumeForm
#align orientation.area_form Orientation.areaForm
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
theorem areaForm_to_volumeForm (x y : E) : ω x y = o.volumeForm ![x, y] := by simp [areaForm]
#align orientation.area_form_to_volume_form Orientation.areaForm_to_volumeForm
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_apply_self (x : E) : ω x x = 0 := by
rw [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
refine o.volumeForm.map_eq_zero_of_eq ![x, x] ?_ (?_ : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1)
· simp
· norm_num
#align orientation.area_form_apply_self Orientation.areaForm_apply_self
theorem areaForm_swap (x y : E) : ω x y = -ω y x := by
simp only [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
convert o.volumeForm.map_swap ![y, x] (_ : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1)
· ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
· norm_num
#align orientation.area_form_swap Orientation.areaForm_swap
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_neg_orientation : (-o).areaForm = -o.areaForm := by
ext x y
simp [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
#align orientation.area_form_neg_orientation Orientation.areaForm_neg_orientation
/-- Continuous linear map version of `Orientation.areaForm`, useful for calculus. -/
def areaForm' : E →L[ℝ] E →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap
(↑(LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap : (E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) ≃ₗ[ℝ] E →L[ℝ] ℝ) ∘ₗ o.areaForm)
#align orientation.area_form' Orientation.areaForm'
@[simp]
theorem areaForm'_apply (x : E) :
o.areaForm' x = LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (o.areaForm x) :=
rfl
#align orientation.area_form'_apply Orientation.areaForm'_apply
theorem abs_areaForm_le (x y : E) : |ω x y| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simpa [areaForm_to_volumeForm, Fin.prod_univ_succ] using o.abs_volumeForm_apply_le ![x, y]
#align orientation.abs_area_form_le Orientation.abs_areaForm_le
theorem areaForm_le (x y : E) : ω x y ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simpa [areaForm_to_volumeForm, Fin.prod_univ_succ] using o.volumeForm_apply_le ![x, y]
#align orientation.area_form_le Orientation.areaForm_le
theorem abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal {x y : E} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) : |ω x y| = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [o.areaForm_to_volumeForm, o.abs_volumeForm_apply_of_pairwise_orthogonal]
· simp [Fin.prod_univ_succ]
intro i j hij
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j
· simp_all
· simpa using h
· simpa [real_inner_comm] using h
· simp_all
#align orientation.abs_area_form_of_orthogonal Orientation.abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal
theorem areaForm_map {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[hF : Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (x y : F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).areaForm x y =
o.areaForm (φ.symm x) (φ.symm y) := by
have : φ.symm ∘ ![x, y] = ![φ.symm x, φ.symm y] := by
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
simp [areaForm_to_volumeForm, volumeForm_map, this]
#align orientation.area_form_map Orientation.areaForm_map
/-- The area form is invariant under pullback by a positively-oriented isometric automorphism. -/
theorem areaForm_comp_linearIsometryEquiv (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) (x y : E) :
o.areaForm (φ x) (φ y) = o.areaForm x y := by
convert o.areaForm_map φ (φ x) (φ y)
· symm
rwa [← o.map_eq_iff_det_pos φ.toLinearEquiv] at hφ
rw [@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2), Fintype.card_fin]
· simp
· simp
#align orientation.area_form_comp_linear_isometry_equiv Orientation.areaForm_comp_linearIsometryEquiv
/-- Auxiliary construction for `Orientation.rightAngleRotation`, rotation by 90 degrees in an
oriented real inner product space of dimension 2. -/
irreducible_def rightAngleRotationAux₁ : E →ₗ[ℝ] E :=
let to_dual : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
(InnerProductSpace.toDual ℝ E).toLinearEquiv ≪≫ₗ LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap.symm
↑to_dual.symm ∘ₗ ω
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_aux₁ Orientation.rightAngleRotationAux₁
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left (x y : E) : ⟪o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x, y⟫ = ω x y := by
-- Porting note: split `simp only` for greater proof control
simp only [rightAngleRotationAux₁, LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv_symm,
LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.trans_apply,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv]
rw [InnerProductSpace.toDual_symm_apply]
norm_cast
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_aux₁_left Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right (x y : E) :
⟪x, o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ y⟫ = -ω x y := by
rw [real_inner_comm]
simp [o.areaForm_swap y x]
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_aux₁_right Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right
/-- Auxiliary construction for `Orientation.rightAngleRotation`, rotation by 90 degrees in an
oriented real inner product space of dimension 2. -/
def rightAngleRotationAux₂ : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] E :=
{ o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ with
norm_map' := fun x => by
dsimp
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (norm_nonneg (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x)) with h h
· rw [← h]
positivity
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ h
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left]
exact o.areaForm_le x (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x)
· let K : Submodule ℝ E := ℝ ∙ x
have : Nontrivial Kᗮ := by
apply @FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_pos ℝ
have : finrank ℝ K ≤ Finset.card {x} := by
rw [← Set.toFinset_singleton]
exact finrank_span_le_card ({x} : Set E)
have : Finset.card {x} = 1 := Finset.card_singleton x
have : finrank ℝ K + finrank ℝ Kᗮ = finrank ℝ E := K.finrank_add_finrank_orthogonal
have : finrank ℝ E = 2 := Fact.out
linarith
obtain ⟨w, hw₀⟩ : ∃ w : Kᗮ, w ≠ 0 := exists_ne 0
have hw' : ⟪x, (w : E)⟫ = 0 := Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.mp w.2
have hw : (w : E) ≠ 0 := fun h => hw₀ (Submodule.coe_eq_zero.mp h)
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ (by rwa [norm_pos_iff] : 0 < ‖(w : E)‖)
rw [← o.abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal hw']
rw [← o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left x w]
exact abs_real_inner_le_norm (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x) w }
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_aux₂ Orientation.rightAngleRotationAux₂
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotationAux₁_rightAngleRotationAux₁ (x : E) :
o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x) = -x := by
apply ext_inner_left ℝ
intro y
have : ⟪o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ y, o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x⟫ = ⟪y, x⟫ :=
LinearIsometry.inner_map_map o.rightAngleRotationAux₂ y x
rw [o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right, ← o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left, this,
inner_neg_right]
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_aux₁_right_angle_rotation_aux₁ Orientation.rightAngleRotationAux₁_rightAngleRotationAux₁
/-- An isometric automorphism of an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 (usual notation
`J`). This automorphism squares to -1. We will define rotations in such a way that this
automorphism is equal to rotation by 90 degrees. -/
irreducible_def rightAngleRotation : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry o.rightAngleRotationAux₂ (-o.rightAngleRotationAux₁)
(by ext; simp [rightAngleRotationAux₂]) (by ext; simp [rightAngleRotationAux₂])
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation Orientation.rightAngleRotation
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_left (x y : E) : ⟪J x, y⟫ = ω x y := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left x y
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_left Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, J y⟫ = -ω x y := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right x y
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_right Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation (x : E) : J (J x) = -x := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.rightAngleRotationAux₁_rightAngleRotationAux₁ x
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_right_angle_rotation Orientation.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_symm :
LinearIsometryEquiv.symm J = LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J (LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ) := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearIsometry_injective rfl
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_symm Orientation.rightAngleRotation_symm
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp already proves this
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_self (x : E) : ⟪J x, x⟫ = 0 := by simp
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_self Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_self
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_swap (x y : E) : ⟪x, J y⟫ = -⟪J x, y⟫ := by simp
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_swap Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_swap
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_swap' (x y : E) : ⟪J x, y⟫ = -⟪x, J y⟫ := by
simp [o.inner_rightAngleRotation_swap x y]
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_swap' Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_swap'
theorem inner_comp_rightAngleRotation (x y : E) : ⟪J x, J y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_map J x y
#align orientation.inner_comp_right_angle_rotation Orientation.inner_comp_rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left (x y : E) : ω (J x) y = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← o.inner_comp_rightAngleRotation, o.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, neg_neg]
#align orientation.area_form_right_angle_rotation_left Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right (x y : E) : ω x (J y) = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← o.inner_rightAngleRotation_left, o.inner_comp_rightAngleRotation]
#align orientation.area_form_right_angle_rotation_right Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp already proves this
theorem areaForm_comp_rightAngleRotation (x y : E) : ω (J x) (J y) = ω x y := by simp
#align orientation.area_form_comp_right_angle_rotation Orientation.areaForm_comp_rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_trans_rightAngleRotation :
LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J J = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by ext; simp
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_trans_right_angle_rotation Orientation.rightAngleRotation_trans_rightAngleRotation
theorem rightAngleRotation_neg_orientation (x : E) :
(-o).rightAngleRotation x = -o.rightAngleRotation x := by
apply ext_inner_right ℝ
intro y
rw [inner_rightAngleRotation_left]
simp
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_neg_orientation Orientation.rightAngleRotation_neg_orientation
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_trans_neg_orientation :
(-o).rightAngleRotation = o.rightAngleRotation.trans (LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.rightAngleRotation_neg_orientation
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_trans_neg_orientation Orientation.rightAngleRotation_trans_neg_orientation
theorem rightAngleRotation_map {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[hF : Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (x : F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).rightAngleRotation x =
φ (o.rightAngleRotation (φ.symm x)) := by
apply ext_inner_right ℝ
intro y
rw [inner_rightAngleRotation_left]
trans ⟪J (φ.symm x), φ.symm y⟫
· simp [o.areaForm_map]
trans ⟪φ (J (φ.symm x)), φ (φ.symm y)⟫
· rw [φ.inner_map_map]
· simp
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_map Orientation.rightAngleRotation_map
/-- `J` commutes with any positively-oriented isometric automorphism. -/
theorem linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) (x : E) : φ (J x) = J (φ x) := by
convert (o.rightAngleRotation_map φ (φ x)).symm
· simp
· symm
rwa [← o.map_eq_iff_det_pos φ.toLinearEquiv] at hφ
rw [@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2), Fintype.card_fin]
#align orientation.linear_isometry_equiv_comp_right_angle_rotation Orientation.linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation
theorem rightAngleRotation_map' {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).rightAngleRotation =
(φ.symm.trans o.rightAngleRotation).trans φ :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.rightAngleRotation_map φ
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_map' Orientation.rightAngleRotation_map'
/-- `J` commutes with any positively-oriented isometric automorphism. -/
theorem linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation' (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) :
LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J φ = φ.trans J :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation φ hφ
#align orientation.linear_isometry_equiv_comp_right_angle_rotation' Orientation.linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation'
/-- For a nonzero vector `x` in an oriented two-dimensional real inner product space `E`,
`![x, J x]` forms an (orthogonal) basis for `E`. -/
def basisRightAngleRotation (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) : Basis (Fin 2) ℝ E :=
@basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ![x, J x]
(linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero (fun i => by fin_cases i <;> simp [hx])
(by
intro i j hij
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp_all))
(@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2)).symm
#align orientation.basis_right_angle_rotation Orientation.basisRightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem coe_basisRightAngleRotation (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
⇑(o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) = ![x, J x] :=
coe_basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank _ _
#align orientation.coe_basis_right_angle_rotation Orientation.coe_basisRightAngleRotation
/-- For vectors `a x y : E`, the identity `⟪a, x⟫ * ⟪a, y⟫ + ω a x * ω a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ⟪x, y⟫`. (See
`Orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm` for the "applied" form.)-/
theorem inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm' (a x : E) :
⟪a, x⟫ • innerₛₗ ℝ a + ω a x • ω a = ‖a‖ ^ 2 • innerₛₗ ℝ x := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation a ha).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· simp only [Fin.mk_zero, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_zero, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.smul_apply, innerₛₗ_apply, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, smul_eq_mul,
areaForm_apply_self, mul_zero, add_zero, Real.rpow_two, real_inner_comm]
ring
· simp only [Fin.mk_one, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_one, Matrix.head_cons,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, innerₛₗ_apply, inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
areaForm_apply_self, neg_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, zero_add, Real.rpow_two, mul_neg]
rw [o.areaForm_swap]
ring
#align orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_area_form_mul_area_form' Orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm'
/-- For vectors `a x y : E`, the identity `⟪a, x⟫ * ⟪a, y⟫ + ω a x * ω a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ⟪x, y⟫`. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm (a x y : E) :
⟪a, x⟫ * ⟪a, y⟫ + ω a x * ω a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
congr_arg (fun f : E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ => f y) (o.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm' a x)
#align orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_area_form_mul_area_form Orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm
theorem inner_sq_add_areaForm_sq (a b : E) : ⟪a, b⟫ ^ 2 + ω a b ^ 2 = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ‖b‖ ^ 2 := by
simpa [sq, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq] using o.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm a b b
#align orientation.inner_sq_add_area_form_sq Orientation.inner_sq_add_areaForm_sq
/-- For vectors `a x y : E`, the identity `⟪a, x⟫ * ω a y - ω a x * ⟪a, y⟫ = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ω x y`. (See
`Orientation.inner_mul_areaForm_sub` for the "applied" form.) -/
theorem inner_mul_areaForm_sub' (a x : E) : ⟪a, x⟫ • ω a - ω a x • innerₛₗ ℝ a = ‖a‖ ^ 2 • ω x := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation a ha).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· simp only [o.areaForm_swap a x, neg_smul, sub_neg_eq_add, Fin.mk_zero,
coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_zero, LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply,
areaForm_apply_self, smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, innerₛₗ_apply, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq,
zero_add, Real.rpow_two]
ring
· simp only [Fin.mk_one, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_one, Matrix.head_cons,
LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, smul_eq_mul, innerₛₗ_apply, inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
areaForm_apply_self, neg_zero, mul_zero, sub_zero, Real.rpow_two, real_inner_comm]
ring
#align orientation.inner_mul_area_form_sub' Orientation.inner_mul_areaForm_sub'
/-- For vectors `a x y : E`, the identity `⟪a, x⟫ * ω a y - ω a x * ⟪a, y⟫ = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ω x y`. -/
theorem inner_mul_areaForm_sub (a x y : E) : ⟪a, x⟫ * ω a y - ω a x * ⟪a, y⟫ = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ω x y :=
congr_arg (fun f : E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ => f y) (o.inner_mul_areaForm_sub' a x)
#align orientation.inner_mul_area_form_sub Orientation.inner_mul_areaForm_sub
theorem nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay (x y : E) :
0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫ ∧ ω x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
constructor
· let a : ℝ := (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).repr y 0
let b : ℝ := (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).repr y 1
suffices ↑0 ≤ a * ‖x‖ ^ 2 ∧ b * ‖x‖ ^ 2 = 0 → SameRay ℝ x (a • x + b • J x) by
rw [← (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).sum_repr y]
simp only [Fin.sum_univ_succ, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_zero,
Fin.succ_zero_eq_one', Finset.univ_eq_empty, Finset.sum_empty, areaForm_apply_self,
map_smul, map_add, real_inner_smul_right, inner_add_right, Matrix.cons_val_one,
Matrix.head_cons, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right,
mul_zero, add_zero, zero_add, neg_zero, inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, zero_smul, one_smul]
exact this
rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
have hx' : 0 < ‖x‖ := by simpa using hx
have ha' : 0 ≤ a := nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left ha (by positivity)
have hb' : b = 0 := eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_right_eq_zero (pow_ne_zero 2 hx'.ne') hb
exact (SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_right x ha').add_right $ by simp [hb']
· intro h
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
simp only [inner_smul_right, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ,
areaForm_apply_self, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, eq_self_iff_true,
and_true_iff]
positivity
#align orientation.nonneg_inner_and_area_form_eq_zero_iff_same_ray Orientation.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay
/-- A complex-valued real-bilinear map on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2. Its
real part is the inner product and its imaginary part is `Orientation.areaForm`.
On `ℂ` with the standard orientation, `kahler w z = conj w * z`; see `Complex.kahler`. -/
def kahler : E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ :=
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E ℝ ℂ Complex.ofRealCLM ∘ₗ innerₛₗ ℝ +
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E ℝ ℂ ((LinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℂ).flip Complex.I) ∘ₗ ω
#align orientation.kahler Orientation.kahler
theorem kahler_apply_apply (x y : E) : o.kahler x y = ⟪x, y⟫ + ω x y • Complex.I :=
rfl
#align orientation.kahler_apply_apply Orientation.kahler_apply_apply
theorem kahler_swap (x y : E) : o.kahler x y = conj (o.kahler y x) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal' r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
simp only [kahler_apply_apply]
rw [real_inner_comm, areaForm_swap]
simp [this]
#align orientation.kahler_swap Orientation.kahler_swap
@[simp]
theorem kahler_apply_self (x : E) : o.kahler x x = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
simp [kahler_apply_apply, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq]
#align orientation.kahler_apply_self Orientation.kahler_apply_self
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rightAngleRotation_left (x y : E) :
o.kahler (J x) y = -Complex.I * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, o.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
o.kahler_apply_apply, Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.real_smul]
linear_combination ω x y * Complex.I_sq
#align orientation.kahler_right_angle_rotation_left Orientation.kahler_rightAngleRotation_left
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rightAngleRotation_right (x y : E) :
o.kahler x (J y) = Complex.I * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right, o.inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
o.kahler_apply_apply, Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.real_smul]
linear_combination -ω x y * Complex.I_sq
#align orientation.kahler_right_angle_rotation_right Orientation.kahler_rightAngleRotation_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `kahler_comp_rightAngleRotation'`
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/TwoDim.lean | 516 | 518 | theorem kahler_comp_rightAngleRotation (x y : E) : o.kahler (J x) (J y) = o.kahler x y := by |
simp only [kahler_rightAngleRotation_left, kahler_rightAngleRotation_right]
linear_combination -o.kahler x y * Complex.I_sq
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.digits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
#align nat.digits_aux_0 Nat.digitsAux0
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
#align nat.digits_aux_1 Nat.digitsAux1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
#align nat.digits_aux Nat.digitsAux
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_zero Nat.digitsAux_zero
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_def Nat.digitsAux_def
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
#align nat.digits Nat.digits
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
#align nat.digits_zero Nat.digits_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_zero Nat.digits_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ Nat.digits_zero_succ
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ' Nat.digits_zero_succ'
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one Nat.digits_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one_succ Nat.digits_one_succ
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
#align nat.digits_add_two_add_one Nat.digits_add_two_add_one
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
#align nat.digits_def' Nat.digits_def'
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
#align nat.digits_of_lt Nat.digits_of_lt
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.digits_add Nat.digits_add
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
#align nat.of_digits Nat.ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
#align nat.of_digits_eq_foldr Nat.ofDigits_eq_foldr
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
((List.range l.length).zipWith ((fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) l).sum =
b * ((List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => a * b ^ i) l).sum := by
suffices
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) l =
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => b * (a * b ^ i)) l
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_enum_map, List.enum_eq_zip_range, List.map_uncurry_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr]
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_left, ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux] using
Or.inl hl
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_singleton Nat.ofDigits_singleton
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_one_cons Nat.ofDigits_one_cons
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
#align nat.of_digits_append Nat.ofDigits_append
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
#align nat.coe_of_digits Nat.coe_ofDigits
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
#align nat.coe_int_of_digits Nat.coe_int_ofDigits
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
#align nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero Nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
#align nat.digits_of_digits Nat.digits_ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
cases' b with b
· cases' n with n
· rfl
· change ofDigits 0 [n + 1] = n + 1
dsimp [ofDigits]
· cases' b with b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· apply Nat.strongInductionOn n _
clear n
intro n h
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
#align nat.of_digits_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits
theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by
induction' L with _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
#align nat.of_digits_one Nat.ofDigits_one
/-!
### Properties
This section contains various lemmas of properties relating to `digits` and `ofDigits`.
-/
theorem digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
have : ofDigits b (digits b n) = ofDigits b [] := by rw [h]
convert this
rw [ofDigits_digits]
· rintro rfl
simp
#align nat.digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero Nat.digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
theorem digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
#align nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero Nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero
theorem digits_eq_cons_digits_div {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (w : n ≠ 0) :
digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b) := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· rw [digits_zero_succ' w, Nat.mod_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.digits_zero_zero]
· norm_num at h
rcases n with (_ | n)
· norm_num at w
· simp only [digits_add_two_add_one, ne_eq]
#align nat.digits_eq_cons_digits_div Nat.digits_eq_cons_digits_div
theorem digits_getLast {b : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (p q) :
(digits b m).getLast p = (digits b (m / b)).getLast q := by
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp [hm]
simp only [digits_eq_cons_digits_div h hm]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
#align nat.digits_last Nat.digits_getLast
theorem digits.injective (b : ℕ) : Function.Injective b.digits :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective (ofDigits_digits b)
#align nat.digits.injective Nat.digits.injective
@[simp]
theorem digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} : b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
#align nat.digits_inj_iff Nat.digits_inj_iff
theorem digits_len (b n : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (b.digits n).length = b.log n + 1 := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rw [digits_eq_cons_digits_div hb hn, List.length]
by_cases h : n / b = 0
· have hb0 : b ≠ 0 := (Nat.succ_le_iff.1 hb).ne_bot
simp [h, log_eq_zero_iff, ← Nat.div_eq_zero_iff hb0.bot_lt]
· have : n / b < n := div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) hb
rw [IH _ this h, log_div_base, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
refine Nat.succ_le_of_lt (log_pos hb ?_)
contrapose! h
exact div_eq_of_lt h
#align nat.digits_len Nat.digits_len
theorem getLast_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).getLast (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
· simp
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
rename ℕ => m
simp only [zero_add, digits_one, List.getLast_replicate_succ m 1]
exact Nat.one_ne_zero
revert hm
apply Nat.strongInductionOn m
intro n IH hn
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2
· simpa only [digits_of_lt (b + 2) n hn hnb]
· rw [digits_getLast n (le_add_left 2 b)]
refine IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self hn.bot_lt (one_lt_succ_succ b)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact Nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) (zero_lt_succ (succ b))
#align nat.last_digit_ne_zero Nat.getLast_digit_ne_zero
theorem mul_ofDigits (n : ℕ) {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
n * ofDigits b l = ofDigits b (l.map (n * ·)) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, ofDigits_cons, ofDigits_cons, ← ih]
ring
/-- The addition of ofDigits of two lists is equal to ofDigits of digit-wise addition of them-/
theorem ofDigits_add_ofDigits_eq_ofDigits_zipWith_of_length_eq {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ}
(h : l1.length = l2.length) :
ofDigits b l1 + ofDigits b l2 = ofDigits b (l1.zipWith (· + ·) l2) := by
induction l1 generalizing l2 with
| nil => simp_all [eq_comm, List.length_eq_zero, ofDigits]
| cons hd₁ tl₁ ih₁ =>
induction l2 generalizing tl₁ with
| nil => simp_all
| cons hd₂ tl₂ ih₂ =>
simp_all only [List.length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, ofDigits_cons, add_left_inj,
eq_comm, List.zipWith_cons_cons, add_eq]
rw [← ih₁ h.symm, mul_add]
ac_rfl
/-- The digits in the base b+2 expansion of n are all less than b+2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b + 2) m → d < b + 2 := by
apply Nat.strongInductionOn m
intro n IH d hd
cases' n with n
· rw [digits_zero] at hd
cases hd
-- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw [digits_add_two_add_one] at hd
cases hd
· exact n.succ.mod_lt (by simp)
-- Porting note: Previous code (single line) contained linarith.
-- . exact IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) (by linarith)) hd
· apply IH ((n + 1) / (b + 2))
· apply Nat.div_lt_self <;> omega
· assumption
#align nat.digits_lt_base' Nat.digits_lt_base'
/-- The digits in the base b expansion of n are all less than b, if b ≥ 2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base {b m d : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hd : d ∈ digits b m) : d < b := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact digits_lt_base' hd
#align nat.digits_lt_base Nat.digits_lt_base
/-- an n-digit number in base b + 2 is less than (b + 2)^n -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b + 2) :
ofDigits (b + 2) l < (b + 2) ^ l.length := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.length_cons, pow_succ]
have : (ofDigits (b + 2) tl + 1) * (b + 2) ≤ (b + 2) ^ tl.length * (b + 2) :=
mul_le_mul (IH fun x hx => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)) (by rfl) (by simp only [zero_le])
(Nat.zero_le _)
suffices ↑hd < b + 2 by linarith
exact hl hd (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
#align nat.of_digits_lt_base_pow_length' Nat.ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length'
/-- an n-digit number in base b is less than b^n if b > 1 -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b) :
ofDigits b l < b ^ l.length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' hl
#align nat.of_digits_lt_base_pow_length Nat.ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length
/-- Any number m is less than (b+2)^(number of digits in the base b + 2 representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits' {b m : ℕ} : m < (b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length := by
convert @ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' b (digits (b + 2) m) fun _ => digits_lt_base'
rw [ofDigits_digits (b + 2) m]
#align nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits' Nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits'
/-- Any number m is less than b^(number of digits in the base b representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits {b m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : m < b ^ (digits b m).length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact lt_base_pow_length_digits'
#align nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits Nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits
theorem ofDigits_digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} :
ofDigits b (digits b n ++ digits b m) = n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m := by
rw [ofDigits_append, ofDigits_digits, ofDigits_digits]
#align nat.of_digits_digits_append_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits_append_digits
theorem digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) :
digits b n ++ digits b m = digits b (n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hb) with (rfl | hb)
· simp [List.replicate_add]
rw [← ofDigits_digits_append_digits]
refine (digits_ofDigits b hb _ (fun l hl => ?_) (fun h_append => ?_)).symm
· rcases (List.mem_append.mp hl) with (h | h) <;> exact digits_lt_base hb h
· by_cases h : digits b m = []
· simp only [h, List.append_nil] at h_append ⊢
exact getLast_digit_ne_zero b <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h_append
· exact (List.getLast_append' _ _ h) ▸
(getLast_digit_ne_zero _ <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h)
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 476 | 482 | theorem digits_len_le_digits_len_succ (b n : ℕ) :
(digits b n).length ≤ (digits b (n + 1)).length := by |
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· interval_cases b <;> simp_arith [digits_zero_succ', hn]
simpa [digits_len, hb, hn] using log_mono_right (le_succ _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Quotient
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Polish
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Floor
#align_import measure_theory.integral.periodic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# Integrals of periodic functions
In this file we prove that the half-open interval `Ioc t (t + T)` in `ℝ` is a fundamental domain of
the action of the subgroup `ℤ ∙ T` on `ℝ`.
A consequence is `AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk`: the covering map from `ℝ` to the "additive
circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` is measure-preserving, with respect to the restriction of Lebesgue measure to
`Ioc t (t + T)` (upstairs) and with respect to Haar measure (downstairs).
Another consequence (`Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq` and related declarations) is that
`∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x` for any (not necessarily measurable) function with
period `T`.
-/
open Set Function MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace AddSubgroup intervalIntegral
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
@[measurability]
protected theorem AddCircle.measurable_mk' {a : ℝ} :
Measurable (β := AddCircle a) ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle a) :=
Continuous.measurable <| AddCircle.continuous_mk' a
#align add_circle.measurable_mk' AddCircle.measurable_mk'
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ)
(μ : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) (Ioc t (t + T)) μ := by
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk' measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet fun x => ?_
have : Bijective (codRestrict (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) _) :=
(Equiv.ofInjective (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (zsmul_strictMono_left hT).injective).bijective
refine this.existsUnique_iff.2 ?_
simpa only [add_comm x] using existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hT x t
#align is_add_fundamental_domain_Ioc isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.op <| .zmultiples T) (Ioc t (t + T)) μ := by
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk' measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet fun x => ?_
have : Bijective (codRestrict (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) _) :=
(Equiv.ofInjective (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (zsmul_strictMono_left hT).injective).bijective
refine (AddSubgroup.equivOp _).bijective.comp this |>.existsUnique_iff.2 ?_
simpa using existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hT x t
#align is_add_fundamental_domain_Ioc' isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc'
namespace AddCircle
variable (T : ℝ) [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- Equip the "additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` with, as a standard measure, the Haar measure of total
mass `T` -/
noncomputable instance measureSpace : MeasureSpace (AddCircle T) :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.measurableSpace _ with volume := ENNReal.ofReal T • addHaarMeasure ⊤ }
#align add_circle.measure_space AddCircle.measureSpace
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
protected theorem measure_univ : volume (Set.univ : Set (AddCircle T)) = ENNReal.ofReal T := by
dsimp [volume]
rw [← PositiveCompacts.coe_top]
simp [addHaarMeasure_self (G := AddCircle T), -PositiveCompacts.coe_top]
#align add_circle.measure_univ AddCircle.measure_univ
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) :=
IsAddHaarMeasure.smul _ (by simp [hT.out]) ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
instance isFiniteMeasure : IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) where
measure_univ_lt_top := by simp
#align add_circle.is_finite_measure AddCircle.isFiniteMeasure
instance : HasAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.op <| .zmultiples T) ℝ where
ExistsIsAddFundamentalDomain := ⟨Ioc 0 (0 + T), isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' Fact.out 0⟩
instance : AddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage volume (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) := by
apply MeasureTheory.leftInvariantIsAddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage
simp [(isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out 0).covolume_eq_volume, AddCircle.measure_univ]
/-- The covering map from `ℝ` to the "additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` is measure-preserving,
considered with respect to the standard measure (defined to be the Haar measure of total mass `T`)
on the additive circle, and with respect to the restriction of Lebsegue measure on `ℝ` to an
interval (t, t + T]. -/
protected theorem measurePreserving_mk (t : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (β := AddCircle T) ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T)
(volume.restrict (Ioc t (t + T))) :=
measurePreserving_quotientAddGroup_mk_of_AddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage
volume (𝓕 := Ioc t (t+T)) (isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out _) _
#align add_circle.measure_preserving_mk AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk
lemma add_projection_respects_measure (t : ℝ) {U : Set (AddCircle T)} (meas_U : MeasurableSet U) :
volume U = volume (QuotientAddGroup.mk ⁻¹' U ∩ (Ioc t (t + T))) :=
(isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out _).addProjection_respects_measure_apply
(volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) meas_U
theorem volume_closedBall {x : AddCircle T} (ε : ℝ) :
volume (Metric.closedBall x ε) = ENNReal.ofReal (min T (2 * ε)) := by
have hT' : |T| = T := abs_eq_self.mpr hT.out.le
let I := Ioc (-(T / 2)) (T / 2)
have h₁ : ε < T / 2 → Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε ∩ I = Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε := by
intro hε
rw [inter_eq_left, Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_sub, zero_add]
rintro y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; constructor <;> linarith
have h₂ : (↑) ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (0 : AddCircle T) ε ∩ I =
if ε < T / 2 then Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε else I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← if_ctx_congr (Iff.rfl : ε < T / 2 ↔ ε < T / 2) h₁ fun _ => rfl, ← hT']
apply coe_real_preimage_closedBall_inter_eq
simpa only [hT', Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_add, zero_sub] using Ioc_subset_Icc_self
rw [addHaar_closedBall_center, add_projection_respects_measure T (-(T/2))
measurableSet_closedBall, (by linarith : -(T / 2) + T = T / 2), h₂]
by_cases hε : ε < T / 2
· simp [hε, min_eq_right (by linarith : 2 * ε ≤ T)]
· simp [I, hε, min_eq_left (by linarith : T ≤ 2 * ε)]
#align add_circle.volume_closed_ball AddCircle.volume_closedBall
instance : IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) := by
refine ⟨⟨Real.toNNReal 2, Filter.eventually_of_forall fun ε x => ?_⟩⟩
simp only [volume_closedBall]
erw [← ENNReal.ofReal_mul zero_le_two]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
rw [mul_min_of_nonneg _ _ (zero_le_two : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2)]
exact min_le_min (by linarith [hT.out]) (le_refl _)
/-- The isomorphism `AddCircle T ≃ Ioc a (a + T)` whose inverse is the natural quotient map,
as an equivalence of measurable spaces. -/
noncomputable def measurableEquivIoc (a : ℝ) : AddCircle T ≃ᵐ Ioc a (a + T) where
toEquiv := equivIoc T a
measurable_toFun := measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mp <| ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun _x hx =>
continuousAt_equivIoc T a hx).measurable
measurable_invFun := AddCircle.measurable_mk'.comp measurable_subtype_coe
#align add_circle.measurable_equiv_Ioc AddCircle.measurableEquivIoc
/-- The isomorphism `AddCircle T ≃ Ico a (a + T)` whose inverse is the natural quotient map,
as an equivalence of measurable spaces. -/
noncomputable def measurableEquivIco (a : ℝ) : AddCircle T ≃ᵐ Ico a (a + T) where
toEquiv := equivIco T a
measurable_toFun := measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mp <| ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun _x hx =>
continuousAt_equivIco T a hx).measurable
measurable_invFun := AddCircle.measurable_mk'.comp measurable_subtype_coe
#align add_circle.measurable_equiv_Ico AddCircle.measurableEquivIco
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace in
/-- The lower integral of a function over `AddCircle T` is equal to the lower integral over an
interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem lintegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a in Ioc t (t + T), f a) = ∫⁻ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
have m : MeasurableSet (Ioc t (t + T)) := measurableSet_Ioc
have := lintegral_map_equiv (μ := volume) f (measurableEquivIoc T t).symm
simp only [measurableEquivIoc, equivIoc, QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk,
MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk] at this
rw [← (AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk T t).map_eq]
convert this.symm using 1
· rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe m _]
exact MeasurableEmbedding.lintegral_map (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe m) _
· congr 1
have : ((↑) : Ioc t (t + T) → AddCircle T) = ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T) ∘ ((↑) : _ → ℝ) := by
ext1 x; rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [← map_map AddCircle.measurable_mk' measurable_subtype_coe, ← map_comap_subtype_coe m]
rfl
#align add_circle.lintegral_preimage AddCircle.lintegral_preimage
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace in
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `AddCircle T` is equal
to the integral over an interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem integral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → E) :
(∫ a in Ioc t (t + T), f a) = ∫ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
have m : MeasurableSet (Ioc t (t + T)) := measurableSet_Ioc
have := integral_map_equiv (μ := volume) (measurableEquivIoc T t).symm f
simp only [measurableEquivIoc, equivIoc, QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk,
MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk] at this
rw [← (AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk T t).map_eq, ← integral_subtype m, ← this]
have : ((↑) : Ioc t (t + T) → AddCircle T) = ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T) ∘ ((↑) : _ → ℝ) := by
ext1 x; rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [← map_map AddCircle.measurable_mk' measurable_subtype_coe, ← map_comap_subtype_coe m]
rfl
#align add_circle.integral_preimage AddCircle.integral_preimage
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `AddCircle T` is equal
to the integral over an interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem intervalIntegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → E) :
∫ a in t..t + T, f a = ∫ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
rw [integral_of_le, AddCircle.integral_preimage T t f]
linarith [hT.out]
#align add_circle.interval_integral_preimage AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage
end AddCircle
namespace UnitAddCircle
attribute [local instance] Real.fact_zero_lt_one
protected theorem measure_univ : volume (Set.univ : Set UnitAddCircle) = 1 := by simp
#align unit_add_circle.measure_univ UnitAddCircle.measure_univ
/-- The covering map from `ℝ` to the "unit additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ ℤ` is measure-preserving,
considered with respect to the standard measure (defined to be the Haar measure of total mass 1)
on the additive circle, and with respect to the restriction of Lebsegue measure on `ℝ` to an
interval (t, t + 1]. -/
protected theorem measurePreserving_mk (t : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (β := UnitAddCircle) ((↑) : ℝ → UnitAddCircle)
(volume.restrict (Ioc t (t + 1))) :=
AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk 1 t
#align unit_add_circle.measure_preserving_mk UnitAddCircle.measurePreserving_mk
/-- The integral of a measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is equal to the integral over an
interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem lintegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a in Ioc t (t + 1), f a) = ∫⁻ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.lintegral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.lintegral_preimage UnitAddCircle.lintegral_preimage
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is
equal to the integral over an interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem integral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → E) :
(∫ a in Ioc t (t + 1), f a) = ∫ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.integral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.integral_preimage UnitAddCircle.integral_preimage
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is
equal to the integral over an interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem intervalIntegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → E) :
∫ a in t..t + 1, f a = ∫ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.interval_integral_preimage UnitAddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage
end UnitAddCircle
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
namespace Function
namespace Periodic
variable {f : ℝ → E} {T : ℝ}
/-- An auxiliary lemma for a more general `Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq`. -/
theorem intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos (hf : Periodic f T) (hT : 0 < T) (t s : ℝ) :
∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x := by
simp only [integral_of_le, hT.le, le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
haveI : VAddInvariantMeasure (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) ℝ volume :=
⟨fun c s _ => measure_preimage_add _ _ _⟩
apply IsAddFundamentalDomain.setIntegral_eq (G := AddSubgroup.zmultiples T)
exacts [isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc hT t, isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc hT s, hf.map_vadd_zmultiples]
#align function.periodic.interval_integral_add_eq_of_pos Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos
/-- If `f` is a periodic function with period `T`, then its integral over `[t, t + T]` does not
depend on `t`. -/
theorem intervalIntegral_add_eq (hf : Periodic f T) (t s : ℝ) :
∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) T with (hT | rfl | hT)
· exact hf.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos hT t s
· simp
· rw [← neg_inj, ← integral_symm, ← integral_symm]
simpa only [← sub_eq_add_neg, add_sub_cancel_right] using
hf.neg.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hT) (t + T) (s + T)
#align function.periodic.interval_integral_add_eq Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq
/-- If `f` is an integrable periodic function with period `T`, then its integral over `[t, s + T]`
is the sum of its integrals over the intervals `[t, s]` and `[t, t + T]`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Periodic.lean | 279 | 282 | theorem intervalIntegral_add_eq_add (hf : Periodic f T) (t s : ℝ)
(h_int : ∀ t₁ t₂, IntervalIntegrable f MeasureSpace.volume t₁ t₂) :
∫ x in t..s + T, f x = (∫ x in t..s, f x) + ∫ x in t..t + T, f x := by |
rw [hf.intervalIntegral_add_eq t s, integral_add_adjacent_intervals (h_int t s) (h_int s _)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.DenseSubsite
#align_import category_theory.sites.induced_topology from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ba43124c37cfe0009bbfc57505f9503ae0e8c1af"
/-!
# Induced Topology
We say that a functor `G : C ⥤ (D, K)` is locally dense if for each covering sieve `T` in `D` of
some `X : C`, `T ∩ mor(C)` generates a covering sieve of `X` in `D`. A locally dense fully faithful
functor then induces a topology on `C` via `{ T ∩ mor(C) | T ∈ K }`. Note that this is equal to
the collection of sieves on `C` whose image generates a covering sieve. This construction would
make `C` both cover-lifting and cover-preserving.
Some typical examples are full and cover-dense functors (for example the functor from a basis of a
topological space `X` into `Opens X`). The functor `Over X ⥤ C` is also locally dense, and the
induced topology can then be used to construct the big sites associated to a scheme.
Given a fully faithful cover-dense functor `G : C ⥤ (D, K)` between small sites, we then have
`Sheaf (H.inducedTopology) A ≌ Sheaf K A`. This is known as the comparison lemma.
## References
* [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, P. T. Johnstone: C2.2.
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/dense+sub-site
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/comparison+lemma
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v u
open Limits Opposite Presieve
section
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] {D : Type*} [Category D] {G : C ⥤ D}
variable {J : GrothendieckTopology C} {K : GrothendieckTopology D}
variable (A : Type v) [Category.{u} A]
-- variables (A) [full G] [faithful G]
/-- We say that a functor `C ⥤ D` into a site is "locally dense" if
for each covering sieve `T` in `D`, `T ∩ mor(C)` generates a covering sieve in `D`.
-/
def LocallyCoverDense (K : GrothendieckTopology D) (G : C ⥤ D) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X : C⦄ (T : K (G.obj X)), (T.val.functorPullback G).functorPushforward G ∈ K (G.obj X)
#align category_theory.locally_cover_dense CategoryTheory.LocallyCoverDense
namespace LocallyCoverDense
variable [G.Full] [G.Faithful] (Hld : LocallyCoverDense K G)
theorem pushforward_cover_iff_cover_pullback {X : C} (S : Sieve X) :
K _ (S.functorPushforward G) ↔ ∃ T : K (G.obj X), T.val.functorPullback G = S := by
constructor
· intro hS
exact ⟨⟨_, hS⟩, (Sieve.fullyFaithfulFunctorGaloisCoinsertion G X).u_l_eq S⟩
· rintro ⟨T, rfl⟩
exact Hld T
#align category_theory.locally_cover_dense.pushforward_cover_iff_cover_pullback CategoryTheory.LocallyCoverDense.pushforward_cover_iff_cover_pullback
/-- If a functor `G : C ⥤ (D, K)` is fully faithful and locally dense,
then the set `{ T ∩ mor(C) | T ∈ K }` is a grothendieck topology of `C`.
-/
@[simps]
def inducedTopology : GrothendieckTopology C where
sieves X S := K _ (S.functorPushforward G)
top_mem' X := by
change K _ _
rw [Sieve.functorPushforward_top]
exact K.top_mem _
pullback_stable' X Y S f hS := by
have : S.pullback f = ((S.functorPushforward G).pullback (G.map f)).functorPullback G := by
conv_lhs => rw [← (Sieve.fullyFaithfulFunctorGaloisCoinsertion G X).u_l_eq S]
ext
change (S.functorPushforward G) _ ↔ (S.functorPushforward G) _
rw [G.map_comp]
rw [this]
change K _ _
apply Hld ⟨_, K.pullback_stable (G.map f) hS⟩
transitive' X S hS S' H' := by
apply K.transitive hS
rintro Y _ ⟨Z, g, i, hg, rfl⟩
rw [Sieve.pullback_comp]
apply K.pullback_stable i
refine K.superset_covering ?_ (H' hg)
rintro W _ ⟨Z', g', i', hg, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Z', g' ≫ g , i', hg, ?_⟩
simp
#align category_theory.locally_cover_dense.induced_topology CategoryTheory.LocallyCoverDense.inducedTopology
/-- `G` is cover-lifting wrt the induced topology. -/
theorem inducedTopology_isCocontinuous : G.IsCocontinuous Hld.inducedTopology K :=
⟨@fun _ S hS => Hld ⟨S, hS⟩⟩
#align category_theory.locally_cover_dense.induced_topology_cover_lifting CategoryTheory.LocallyCoverDense.inducedTopology_isCocontinuous
/-- `G` is cover-preserving wrt the induced topology. -/
theorem inducedTopology_coverPreserving : CoverPreserving Hld.inducedTopology K G :=
⟨@fun _ _ hS => hS⟩
#align category_theory.locally_cover_dense.induced_topology_cover_preserving CategoryTheory.LocallyCoverDense.inducedTopology_coverPreserving
end LocallyCoverDense
variable (G K)
theorem Functor.locallyCoverDense_of_isCoverDense [Full G] [G.IsCoverDense K] :
LocallyCoverDense K G := by
intro X T
refine K.superset_covering ?_ (K.bind_covering T.property
fun Y f _ => G.is_cover_of_isCoverDense _ Y)
rintro Y _ ⟨Z, _, f, hf, ⟨W, g, f', rfl : _ = _⟩, rfl⟩
use W; use G.preimage (f' ≫ f); use g
constructor
· simpa using T.val.downward_closed hf f'
· simp
#align category_theory.cover_dense.locally_cover_dense CategoryTheory.Functor.locallyCoverDense_of_isCoverDense
/-- Given a fully faithful cover-dense functor `G : C ⥤ (D, K)`, we may induce a topology on `C`.
-/
abbrev Functor.inducedTopologyOfIsCoverDense [Full G] [Faithful G] [G.IsCoverDense K] :
GrothendieckTopology C :=
(G.locallyCoverDense_of_isCoverDense K).inducedTopology
#align category_theory.cover_dense.induced_topology CategoryTheory.Functor.inducedTopologyOfIsCoverDense
variable (J)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/InducedTopology.lean | 133 | 141 | theorem over_forget_locallyCoverDense (X : C) : LocallyCoverDense J (Over.forget X) := by |
intro Y T
convert T.property
ext Z f
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, g', hg, rfl⟩
exact T.val.downward_closed hg g'
· intro hf
exact ⟨Over.mk (f ≫ Y.hom), Over.homMk f, 𝟙 _, hf, (Category.id_comp _).symm⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
/-!
# Subsingleton
Defines the predicate `Subsingleton s : Prop`, saying that `s` has at most one element.
Also defines `Nontrivial s : Prop` : the predicate saying that `s` has at least two distinct
elements.
-/
open Function
universe u v
namespace Set
/-! ### Subsingleton -/
section Subsingleton
variable {α : Type u} {a : α} {s t : Set α}
/-- A set `s` is a `Subsingleton` if it has at most one element. -/
protected def Subsingleton (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), x = y
#align set.subsingleton Set.Subsingleton
theorem Subsingleton.anti (ht : t.Subsingleton) (hst : s ⊆ t) : s.Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
ht (hst hx) (hst hy)
#align set.subsingleton.anti Set.Subsingleton.anti
theorem Subsingleton.eq_singleton_of_mem (hs : s.Subsingleton) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : s = {x} :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun hy => hs hx hy ▸ mem_singleton _, fun hy => (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm ▸ hx⟩
#align set.subsingleton.eq_singleton_of_mem Set.Subsingleton.eq_singleton_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_empty : (∅ : Set α).Subsingleton := fun _ => False.elim
#align set.subsingleton_empty Set.subsingleton_empty
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_singleton {a} : ({a} : Set α).Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton hx).symm ▸ (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm ▸ rfl
#align set.subsingleton_singleton Set.subsingleton_singleton
theorem subsingleton_of_subset_singleton (h : s ⊆ {a}) : s.Subsingleton :=
subsingleton_singleton.anti h
#align set.subsingleton_of_subset_singleton Set.subsingleton_of_subset_singleton
theorem subsingleton_of_forall_eq (a : α) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, b = a) : s.Subsingleton := fun _ hb _ hc =>
(h _ hb).trans (h _ hc).symm
#align set.subsingleton_of_forall_eq Set.subsingleton_of_forall_eq
theorem subsingleton_iff_singleton {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.Subsingleton ↔ s = {x} :=
⟨fun h => h.eq_singleton_of_mem hx, fun h => h.symm ▸ subsingleton_singleton⟩
#align set.subsingleton_iff_singleton Set.subsingleton_iff_singleton
theorem Subsingleton.eq_empty_or_singleton (hs : s.Subsingleton) : s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => Or.inr ⟨x, hs.eq_singleton_of_mem hx⟩
#align set.subsingleton.eq_empty_or_singleton Set.Subsingleton.eq_empty_or_singleton
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Subsingleton.lean | 68 | 71 | theorem Subsingleton.induction_on {p : Set α → Prop} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (he : p ∅)
(h₁ : ∀ x, p {x}) : p s := by |
rcases hs.eq_empty_or_singleton with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [he, h₁ _]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
#align_import topology.urysohns_lemma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Urysohn's lemma
In this file we prove Urysohn's lemma `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed`: for any two disjoint
closed sets `s` and `t` in a normal topological space `X` there exists a continuous function
`f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
We also give versions in a regular locally compact space where one assumes that `s` is compact
and `t` is closed, in `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isCompact`
and `exists_continuous_one_zero_of_isCompact` (the latter providing additionally a function with
compact support).
We write a generic proof so that it applies both to normal spaces and to regular locally
compact spaces.
## Implementation notes
Most paper sources prove Urysohn's lemma using a family of open sets indexed by dyadic rational
numbers on `[0, 1]`. There are many technical difficulties with formalizing this proof (e.g., one
needs to formalize the "dyadic induction", then prove that the resulting family of open sets is
monotone). So, we formalize a slightly different proof.
Let `Urysohns.CU` be the type of pairs `(C, U)` of a closed set `C` and an open set `U` such that
`C ⊆ U`. Since `X` is a normal topological space, for each `c : CU` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u ∧ closure u ⊆ c.U`. We define `c.left` and `c.right` to be `(c.C, u)` and
`(closure u, c.U)`, respectively. Then we define a family of functions
`Urysohns.CU.approx (c : Urysohns.CU) (n : ℕ) : X → ℝ` by recursion on `n`:
* `c.approx 0` is the indicator of `c.Uᶜ`;
* `c.approx (n + 1) x = (c.left.approx n x + c.right.approx n x) / 2`.
For each `x` this is a monotone family of functions that are equal to zero on `c.C` and are equal to
one outside of `c.U`. We also have `c.approx n x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `c`, `n`, and `x`.
Let `Urysohns.CU.lim c` be the supremum (or equivalently, the limit) of `c.approx n`. Then
properties of `Urysohns.CU.approx` immediately imply that
* `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `x`;
* `c.lim` equals zero on `c.C` and equals one outside of `c.U`;
* `c.lim x = (c.left.lim x + c.right.lim x) / 2`.
In order to prove that `c.lim` is continuous at `x`, we prove by induction on `n : ℕ` that for `y`
in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `|c.lim y - c.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Induction base follows
from `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]`, `c.lim y ∈ [0, 1]`. For the induction step, consider two cases:
* `x ∈ c.left.U`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `y ∈ c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C`
(hence `c.right.lim x = c.right.lim y = 0`) and `|c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`.
Then
`|c.lim y - c.lim x| = |c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| / 2 ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n / 2 < (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
* otherwise, `x ∉ c.left.right.C`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have
`y ∉ c.left.right.C ⊇ c.left.left.U` (hence `c.left.left.lim x = c.left.left.lim y = 1`),
`|c.left.right.lim y - c.left.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`, and
`|c.right.lim y - c.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Combining these inequalities, the triangle
inequality, and the recurrence formula for `c.lim`, we get
`|c.lim x - c.lim y| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
The actual formalization uses `midpoint ℝ x y` instead of `(x + y) / 2` because we have more API
lemmas about `midpoint`.
## Tags
Urysohn's lemma, normal topological space, locally compact topological space
-/
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Urysohns
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
/-- An auxiliary type for the proof of Urysohn's lemma: a pair of a closed set `C` and its
open neighborhood `U`, together with the assumption that `C` satisfies the property `P C`. The
latter assumption will make it possible to prove simultaneously both versions of Urysohn's lemma,
in normal spaces (with `P` always true) and in locally compact spaces (with `P = IsCompact`).
We put also in the structure the assumption that, for any such pair, one may find an intermediate
pair inbetween satisfying `P`, to avoid carrying it around in the argument. -/
structure CU {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (P : Set X → Prop) where
/-- The inner set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected C : Set X
/-- The outer set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected U : Set X
protected P_C : P C
protected closed_C : IsClosed C
protected open_U : IsOpen U
protected subset : C ⊆ U
protected hP : ∀ {c u : Set X}, IsClosed c → P c → IsOpen u → c ⊆ u →
∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ c ⊆ v ∧ closure v ⊆ u ∧ P (closure v)
#align urysohns.CU Urysohns.CU
namespace CU
variable {P : Set X → Prop}
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.left` is the pair `(c.C, u)`. -/
@[simps C]
def left (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := c.C
U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose
closed_C := c.closed_C
P_C := c.P_C
open_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.1
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.1
hP := c.hP
#align urysohns.CU.left Urysohns.CU.left
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.right` is the pair `(closure u, c.U)`. -/
@[simps U]
def right (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := closure (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose
U := c.U
closed_C := isClosed_closure
P_C := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2
open_U := c.open_U
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.1
hP := c.hP
#align urysohns.CU.right Urysohns.CU.right
theorem left_U_subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C :=
subset_closure
#align urysohns.CU.left_U_subset_right_C Urysohns.CU.left_U_subset_right_C
theorem left_U_subset (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.U :=
Subset.trans c.left_U_subset_right_C c.right.subset
#align urysohns.CU.left_U_subset Urysohns.CU.left_U_subset
theorem subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.C ⊆ c.right.C :=
Subset.trans c.left.subset c.left_U_subset_right_C
#align urysohns.CU.subset_right_C Urysohns.CU.subset_right_C
/-- `n`-th approximation to a continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that `f = 0` on `c.C` and `f = 1`
outside of `c.U`. -/
noncomputable def approx : ℕ → CU P → X → ℝ
| 0, c, x => indicator c.Uᶜ 1 x
| n + 1, c, x => midpoint ℝ (approx n c.left x) (approx n c.right x)
#align urysohns.CU.approx Urysohns.CU.approx
| Mathlib/Topology/UrysohnsLemma.lean | 161 | 166 | theorem approx_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ c.C) : c.approx n x = 0 := by |
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_of_not_mem (fun (hU : x ∈ c.Uᶜ) => hU <| c.subset hx) _
· simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [c.subset_right_C hx, hx]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Exponential
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
#align_import data.complex.exponential_bounds from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"402f8982dddc1864bd703da2d6e2ee304a866973"
/-!
# Bounds on specific values of the exponential
-/
namespace Real
open IsAbsoluteValue Finset CauSeq Complex
theorem exp_one_near_10 : |exp 1 - 2244083 / 825552| ≤ 1 / 10 ^ 10 := by
apply exp_approx_start
iterate 13 refine exp_1_approx_succ_eq (by norm_num1; rfl) (by norm_cast) ?_
norm_num1
refine exp_approx_end' _ (by norm_num1; rfl) _ (by norm_cast) (by simp) ?_
rw [_root_.abs_one, abs_of_pos] <;> norm_num1
#align real.exp_one_near_10 Real.exp_one_near_10
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/ExponentialBounds.lean | 28 | 33 | theorem exp_one_near_20 : |exp 1 - 363916618873 / 133877442384| ≤ 1 / 10 ^ 20 := by |
apply exp_approx_start
iterate 21 refine exp_1_approx_succ_eq (by norm_num1; rfl) (by norm_cast) ?_
norm_num1
refine exp_approx_end' _ (by norm_num1; rfl) _ (by norm_cast) (by simp) ?_
rw [_root_.abs_one, abs_of_pos] <;> norm_num1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
#align_import data.polynomial.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The main defs here are `eval₂`, `eval`, and `map`.
We give several lemmas about their interaction with each other and with module operations.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` given a ring hom `f` from the scalar ring
to the target and a value `x` for the variable in the target -/
irreducible_def eval₂ (p : R[X]) : S :=
p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e
#align polynomial.eval₂ Polynomial.eval₂
theorem eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval₂_def]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum
theorem eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] {f g : R →+* S} {s t : S}
{φ ψ : R[X]} : f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ := by
rintro rfl rfl rfl; rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_congr Polynomial.eval₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero,
mul_one, sum, Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, sum_ite_eq', ite_eq_left_iff,
RingHom.map_zero, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_zero Polynomial.eval₂_at_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 0 := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_zero Polynomial.eval₂_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Eval.lean | 69 | 69 | theorem eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a := by | simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Univariate.Basic
#align_import data.pfunctor.univariate.M from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# M-types
M types are potentially infinite tree-like structures. They are defined
as the greatest fixpoint of a polynomial functor.
-/
universe u v w
open Nat Function
open List
variable (F : PFunctor.{u})
-- Porting note: the ♯ tactic is never used
-- local prefix:0 "♯" => cast (by first |simp [*]|cc|solve_by_elim)
namespace PFunctor
namespace Approx
/-- `CofixA F n` is an `n` level approximation of an M-type -/
inductive CofixA : ℕ → Type u
| continue : CofixA 0
| intro {n} : ∀ a, (F.B a → CofixA n) → CofixA (succ n)
#align pfunctor.approx.cofix_a PFunctor.Approx.CofixA
/-- default inhabitant of `CofixA` -/
protected def CofixA.default [Inhabited F.A] : ∀ n, CofixA F n
| 0 => CofixA.continue
| succ n => CofixA.intro default fun _ => CofixA.default n
#align pfunctor.approx.cofix_a.default PFunctor.Approx.CofixA.default
instance [Inhabited F.A] {n} : Inhabited (CofixA F n) :=
⟨CofixA.default F n⟩
theorem cofixA_eq_zero : ∀ x y : CofixA F 0, x = y
| CofixA.continue, CofixA.continue => rfl
#align pfunctor.approx.cofix_a_eq_zero PFunctor.Approx.cofixA_eq_zero
variable {F}
/-- The label of the root of the tree for a non-trivial
approximation of the cofix of a pfunctor.
-/
def head' : ∀ {n}, CofixA F (succ n) → F.A
| _, CofixA.intro i _ => i
#align pfunctor.approx.head' PFunctor.Approx.head'
/-- for a non-trivial approximation, return all the subtrees of the root -/
def children' : ∀ {n} (x : CofixA F (succ n)), F.B (head' x) → CofixA F n
| _, CofixA.intro _ f => f
#align pfunctor.approx.children' PFunctor.Approx.children'
theorem approx_eta {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F (n + 1)) : x = CofixA.intro (head' x) (children' x) := by
cases x; rfl
#align pfunctor.approx.approx_eta PFunctor.Approx.approx_eta
/-- Relation between two approximations of the cofix of a pfunctor
that state they both contain the same data until one of them is truncated -/
inductive Agree : ∀ {n : ℕ}, CofixA F n → CofixA F (n + 1) → Prop
| continu (x : CofixA F 0) (y : CofixA F 1) : Agree x y
| intro {n} {a} (x : F.B a → CofixA F n) (x' : F.B a → CofixA F (n + 1)) :
(∀ i : F.B a, Agree (x i) (x' i)) → Agree (CofixA.intro a x) (CofixA.intro a x')
#align pfunctor.approx.agree PFunctor.Approx.Agree
/-- Given an infinite series of approximations `approx`,
`AllAgree approx` states that they are all consistent with each other.
-/
def AllAgree (x : ∀ n, CofixA F n) :=
∀ n, Agree (x n) (x (succ n))
#align pfunctor.approx.all_agree PFunctor.Approx.AllAgree
@[simp]
theorem agree_trival {x : CofixA F 0} {y : CofixA F 1} : Agree x y := by constructor
#align pfunctor.approx.agree_trival PFunctor.Approx.agree_trival
theorem agree_children {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F (succ n)) (y : CofixA F (succ n + 1)) {i j}
(h₀ : HEq i j) (h₁ : Agree x y) : Agree (children' x i) (children' y j) := by
cases' h₁ with _ _ _ _ _ _ hagree; cases h₀
apply hagree
#align pfunctor.approx.agree_children PFunctor.Approx.agree_children
/-- `truncate a` turns `a` into a more limited approximation -/
def truncate : ∀ {n : ℕ}, CofixA F (n + 1) → CofixA F n
| 0, CofixA.intro _ _ => CofixA.continue
| succ _, CofixA.intro i f => CofixA.intro i <| truncate ∘ f
#align pfunctor.approx.truncate PFunctor.Approx.truncate
theorem truncate_eq_of_agree {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F n) (y : CofixA F (succ n)) (h : Agree x y) :
truncate y = x := by
induction n <;> cases x <;> cases y
· rfl
· -- cases' h with _ _ _ _ _ h₀ h₁
cases h
simp only [truncate, Function.comp, true_and_iff, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq]
-- Porting note: used to be `ext y`
rename_i n_ih a f y h₁
suffices (fun x => truncate (y x)) = f
by simp [this]
funext y
apply n_ih
apply h₁
#align pfunctor.approx.truncate_eq_of_agree PFunctor.Approx.truncate_eq_of_agree
variable {X : Type w}
variable (f : X → F X)
/-- `sCorec f i n` creates an approximation of height `n`
of the final coalgebra of `f` -/
def sCorec : X → ∀ n, CofixA F n
| _, 0 => CofixA.continue
| j, succ _ => CofixA.intro (f j).1 fun i => sCorec ((f j).2 i) _
#align pfunctor.approx.s_corec PFunctor.Approx.sCorec
theorem P_corec (i : X) (n : ℕ) : Agree (sCorec f i n) (sCorec f i (succ n)) := by
induction' n with n n_ih generalizing i
constructor
cases' f i with y g
constructor
introv
apply n_ih
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.approx.P_corec PFunctor.Approx.P_corec
/-- `Path F` provides indices to access internal nodes in `Corec F` -/
def Path (F : PFunctor.{u}) :=
List F.Idx
#align pfunctor.approx.path PFunctor.Approx.Path
instance Path.inhabited : Inhabited (Path F) :=
⟨[]⟩
#align pfunctor.approx.path.inhabited PFunctor.Approx.Path.inhabited
open List Nat
instance CofixA.instSubsingleton : Subsingleton (CofixA F 0) :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; rfl⟩
theorem head_succ' (n m : ℕ) (x : ∀ n, CofixA F n) (Hconsistent : AllAgree x) :
head' (x (succ n)) = head' (x (succ m)) := by
suffices ∀ n, head' (x (succ n)) = head' (x 1) by simp [this]
clear m n
intro n
cases' h₀ : x (succ n) with _ i₀ f₀
cases' h₁ : x 1 with _ i₁ f₁
dsimp only [head']
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [h₁] at h₀
cases h₀
trivial
· have H := Hconsistent (succ n)
cases' h₂ : x (succ n) with _ i₂ f₂
rw [h₀, h₂] at H
apply n_ih (truncate ∘ f₀)
rw [h₂]
cases' H with _ _ _ _ _ _ hagree
congr
funext j
dsimp only [comp_apply]
rw [truncate_eq_of_agree]
apply hagree
#align pfunctor.approx.head_succ' PFunctor.Approx.head_succ'
end Approx
open Approx
/-- Internal definition for `M`. It is needed to avoid name clashes
between `M.mk` and `M.cases_on` and the declarations generated for
the structure -/
structure MIntl where
/-- An `n`-th level approximation, for each depth `n` -/
approx : ∀ n, CofixA F n
/-- Each approximation agrees with the next -/
consistent : AllAgree approx
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M_intl PFunctor.MIntl
/-- For polynomial functor `F`, `M F` is its final coalgebra -/
def M :=
MIntl F
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M PFunctor.M
theorem M.default_consistent [Inhabited F.A] : ∀ n, Agree (default : CofixA F n) default
| 0 => Agree.continu _ _
| succ n => Agree.intro _ _ fun _ => M.default_consistent n
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.default_consistent PFunctor.M.default_consistent
instance M.inhabited [Inhabited F.A] : Inhabited (M F) :=
⟨{ approx := default
consistent := M.default_consistent _ }⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.inhabited PFunctor.M.inhabited
instance MIntl.inhabited [Inhabited F.A] : Inhabited (MIntl F) :=
show Inhabited (M F) by infer_instance
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M_intl.inhabited PFunctor.MIntl.inhabited
namespace M
theorem ext' (x y : M F) (H : ∀ i : ℕ, x.approx i = y.approx i) : x = y := by
cases x
cases y
congr with n
apply H
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.ext' PFunctor.M.ext'
variable {X : Type*}
variable (f : X → F X)
variable {F}
/-- Corecursor for the M-type defined by `F`. -/
protected def corec (i : X) : M F where
approx := sCorec f i
consistent := P_corec _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.corec PFunctor.M.corec
/-- given a tree generated by `F`, `head` gives us the first piece of data
it contains -/
def head (x : M F) :=
head' (x.1 1)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.head PFunctor.M.head
/-- return all the subtrees of the root of a tree `x : M F` -/
def children (x : M F) (i : F.B (head x)) : M F :=
let H := fun n : ℕ => @head_succ' _ n 0 x.1 x.2
{ approx := fun n => children' (x.1 _) (cast (congr_arg _ <| by simp only [head, H]) i)
consistent := by
intro n
have P' := x.2 (succ n)
apply agree_children _ _ _ P'
trans i
· apply cast_heq
symm
apply cast_heq }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.children PFunctor.M.children
/-- select a subtree using an `i : F.Idx` or return an arbitrary tree if
`i` designates no subtree of `x` -/
def ichildren [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A] (i : F.Idx) (x : M F) : M F :=
if H' : i.1 = head x then children x (cast (congr_arg _ <| by simp only [head, H']) i.2)
else default
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.ichildren PFunctor.M.ichildren
theorem head_succ (n m : ℕ) (x : M F) : head' (x.approx (succ n)) = head' (x.approx (succ m)) :=
head_succ' n m _ x.consistent
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.head_succ PFunctor.M.head_succ
theorem head_eq_head' : ∀ (x : M F) (n : ℕ), head x = head' (x.approx <| n + 1)
| ⟨_, h⟩, _ => head_succ' _ _ _ h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.head_eq_head' PFunctor.M.head_eq_head'
theorem head'_eq_head : ∀ (x : M F) (n : ℕ), head' (x.approx <| n + 1) = head x
| ⟨_, h⟩, _ => head_succ' _ _ _ h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.head'_eq_head PFunctor.M.head'_eq_head
theorem truncate_approx (x : M F) (n : ℕ) : truncate (x.approx <| n + 1) = x.approx n :=
truncate_eq_of_agree _ _ (x.consistent _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.truncate_approx PFunctor.M.truncate_approx
/-- unfold an M-type -/
def dest : M F → F (M F)
| x => ⟨head x, fun i => children x i⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.dest PFunctor.M.dest
namespace Approx
/-- generates the approximations needed for `M.mk` -/
protected def sMk (x : F (M F)) : ∀ n, CofixA F n
| 0 => CofixA.continue
| succ n => CofixA.intro x.1 fun i => (x.2 i).approx n
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.approx.s_mk PFunctor.M.Approx.sMk
protected theorem P_mk (x : F (M F)) : AllAgree (Approx.sMk x)
| 0 => by constructor
| succ n => by
constructor
introv
apply (x.2 i).consistent
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.approx.P_mk PFunctor.M.Approx.P_mk
end Approx
/-- constructor for M-types -/
protected def mk (x : F (M F)) : M F where
approx := Approx.sMk x
consistent := Approx.P_mk x
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.mk PFunctor.M.mk
/-- `Agree' n` relates two trees of type `M F` that
are the same up to depth `n` -/
inductive Agree' : ℕ → M F → M F → Prop
| trivial (x y : M F) : Agree' 0 x y
| step {n : ℕ} {a} (x y : F.B a → M F) {x' y'} :
x' = M.mk ⟨a, x⟩ → y' = M.mk ⟨a, y⟩ → (∀ i, Agree' n (x i) (y i)) → Agree' (succ n) x' y'
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.agree' PFunctor.M.Agree'
@[simp]
theorem dest_mk (x : F (M F)) : dest (M.mk x) = x := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.dest_mk PFunctor.M.dest_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_dest (x : M F) : M.mk (dest x) = x := by
apply ext'
intro n
dsimp only [M.mk]
induction' n with n
· apply @Subsingleton.elim _ CofixA.instSubsingleton
dsimp only [Approx.sMk, dest, head]
cases' h : x.approx (succ n) with _ hd ch
have h' : hd = head' (x.approx 1) := by
rw [← head_succ' n, h, head']
· split
injections
· apply x.consistent
revert ch
rw [h']
intros ch h
congr
ext a
dsimp only [children]
generalize hh : cast _ a = a''
rw [cast_eq_iff_heq] at hh
revert a''
rw [h]
intros _ hh
cases hh
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.mk_dest PFunctor.M.mk_dest
theorem mk_inj {x y : F (M F)} (h : M.mk x = M.mk y) : x = y := by rw [← dest_mk x, h, dest_mk]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.mk_inj PFunctor.M.mk_inj
/-- destructor for M-types -/
protected def cases {r : M F → Sort w} (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) (x : M F) : r x :=
suffices r (M.mk (dest x)) by
rw [← mk_dest x]
exact this
f _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.cases PFunctor.M.cases
/-- destructor for M-types -/
protected def casesOn {r : M F → Sort w} (x : M F) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) : r x :=
M.cases f x
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.cases_on PFunctor.M.casesOn
/-- destructor for M-types, similar to `casesOn` but also
gives access directly to the root and subtrees on an M-type -/
protected def casesOn' {r : M F → Sort w} (x : M F) (f : ∀ a f, r (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩)) : r x :=
M.casesOn x (fun ⟨a, g⟩ => f a g)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.cases_on' PFunctor.M.casesOn'
theorem approx_mk (a : F.A) (f : F.B a → M F) (i : ℕ) :
(M.mk ⟨a, f⟩).approx (succ i) = CofixA.intro a fun j => (f j).approx i :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.approx_mk PFunctor.M.approx_mk
@[simp]
theorem agree'_refl {n : ℕ} (x : M F) : Agree' n x x := by
induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x <;>
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' <;> constructor <;> try rfl
intros
apply n_ih
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.agree'_refl PFunctor.M.agree'_refl
theorem agree_iff_agree' {n : ℕ} (x y : M F) :
Agree (x.approx n) (y.approx <| n + 1) ↔ Agree' n x y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x y
· constructor
· induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
simp only [approx_mk] at h
cases' h with _ _ _ _ _ _ hagree
constructor <;> try rfl
intro i
apply n_ih
apply hagree
· induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x y
· constructor
· cases' h with _ _ _ a x' y'
induction' x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with x_a x_f
induction' y using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with y_a y_f
simp only [approx_mk]
have h_a_1 := mk_inj ‹M.mk ⟨x_a, x_f⟩ = M.mk ⟨a, x'⟩›
cases h_a_1
replace h_a_2 := mk_inj ‹M.mk ⟨y_a, y_f⟩ = M.mk ⟨a, y'⟩›
cases h_a_2
constructor
intro i
apply n_ih
simp [*]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.agree_iff_agree' PFunctor.M.agree_iff_agree'
@[simp]
theorem cases_mk {r : M F → Sort*} (x : F (M F)) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) :
PFunctor.M.cases f (M.mk x) = f x := by
dsimp only [M.mk, PFunctor.M.cases, dest, head, Approx.sMk, head']
cases x; dsimp only [Approx.sMk]
simp only [Eq.mpr]
apply congrFun
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.cases_mk PFunctor.M.cases_mk
@[simp]
theorem casesOn_mk {r : M F → Sort*} (x : F (M F)) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) :
PFunctor.M.casesOn (M.mk x) f = f x :=
cases_mk x f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.cases_on_mk PFunctor.M.casesOn_mk
@[simp]
theorem casesOn_mk' {r : M F → Sort*} {a} (x : F.B a → M F)
(f : ∀ (a) (f : F.B a → M F), r (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩)) :
PFunctor.M.casesOn' (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩) f = f a x :=
@cases_mk F r ⟨a, x⟩ (fun ⟨a, g⟩ => f a g)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.cases_on_mk' PFunctor.M.casesOn_mk'
/-- `IsPath p x` tells us if `p` is a valid path through `x` -/
inductive IsPath : Path F → M F → Prop
| nil (x : M F) : IsPath [] x
|
cons (xs : Path F) {a} (x : M F) (f : F.B a → M F) (i : F.B a) :
x = M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ → IsPath xs (f i) → IsPath (⟨a, i⟩ :: xs) x
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.is_path PFunctor.M.IsPath
theorem isPath_cons {xs : Path F} {a a'} {f : F.B a → M F} {i : F.B a'} :
IsPath (⟨a', i⟩ :: xs) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) → a = a' := by
generalize h : M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ = x
rintro (_ | ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, _⟩)
cases mk_inj h
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.is_path_cons PFunctor.M.isPath_cons
theorem isPath_cons' {xs : Path F} {a} {f : F.B a → M F} {i : F.B a} :
IsPath (⟨a, i⟩ :: xs) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) → IsPath xs (f i) := by
generalize h : M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ = x
rintro (_ | ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, hp⟩)
cases mk_inj h
exact hp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.is_path_cons' PFunctor.M.isPath_cons'
/-- follow a path through a value of `M F` and return the subtree
found at the end of the path if it is a valid path for that value and
return a default tree -/
def isubtree [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] : Path F → M F → M F
| [], x => x
| ⟨a, i⟩ :: ps, x =>
PFunctor.M.casesOn' (r := fun _ => M F) x (fun a' f =>
if h : a = a' then
isubtree ps (f <| cast (by rw [h]) i)
else
default (α := M F)
)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.isubtree PFunctor.M.isubtree
/-- similar to `isubtree` but returns the data at the end of the path instead
of the whole subtree -/
def iselect [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) : M F → F.A := fun x : M F =>
head <| isubtree ps x
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.iselect PFunctor.M.iselect
theorem iselect_eq_default [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) (x : M F)
(h : ¬IsPath ps x) : iselect ps x = head default := by
induction' ps with ps_hd ps_tail ps_ih generalizing x
· exfalso
apply h
constructor
· cases' ps_hd with a i
induction' x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with x_a x_f
simp only [iselect, isubtree] at ps_ih ⊢
by_cases h'' : a = x_a
· subst x_a
simp only [dif_pos, eq_self_iff_true, casesOn_mk']
rw [ps_ih]
intro h'
apply h
constructor <;> try rfl
apply h'
· simp [*]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.iselect_eq_default PFunctor.M.iselect_eq_default
@[simp]
theorem head_mk (x : F (M F)) : head (M.mk x) = x.1 :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
x.1 = (dest (M.mk x)).1 := by rw [dest_mk]
_ = head (M.mk x) := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.head_mk PFunctor.M.head_mk
theorem children_mk {a} (x : F.B a → M F) (i : F.B (head (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩))) :
children (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩) i = x (cast (by rw [head_mk]) i) := by apply ext'; intro n; rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.children_mk PFunctor.M.children_mk
@[simp]
theorem ichildren_mk [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (x : F (M F)) (i : F.Idx) :
ichildren i (M.mk x) = x.iget i := by
dsimp only [ichildren, PFunctor.Obj.iget]
congr with h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.ichildren_mk PFunctor.M.ichildren_mk
@[simp]
theorem isubtree_cons [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) {a} (f : F.B a → M F)
{i : F.B a} : isubtree (⟨_, i⟩ :: ps) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = isubtree ps (f i) := by
simp only [isubtree, ichildren_mk, PFunctor.Obj.iget, dif_pos, isubtree, M.casesOn_mk']; rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.isubtree_cons PFunctor.M.isubtree_cons
@[simp]
theorem iselect_nil [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] {a} (f : F.B a → M F) :
iselect nil (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = a := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.iselect_nil PFunctor.M.iselect_nil
@[simp]
theorem iselect_cons [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) {a} (f : F.B a → M F) {i} :
iselect (⟨a, i⟩ :: ps) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = iselect ps (f i) := by simp only [iselect, isubtree_cons]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.iselect_cons PFunctor.M.iselect_cons
theorem corec_def {X} (f : X → F X) (x₀ : X) : M.corec f x₀ = M.mk (F.map (M.corec f) (f x₀)) := by
dsimp only [M.corec, M.mk]
congr with n
cases' n with n
· dsimp only [sCorec, Approx.sMk]
· dsimp only [sCorec, Approx.sMk]
cases f x₀
dsimp only [PFunctor.map]
congr
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.corec_def PFunctor.M.corec_def
theorem ext_aux [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A] {n : ℕ} (x y z : M F) (hx : Agree' n z x)
(hy : Agree' n z y) (hrec : ∀ ps : Path F, n = ps.length → iselect ps x = iselect ps y) :
x.approx (n + 1) = y.approx (n + 1) := by
induction' n with n n_ih generalizing x y z
· specialize hrec [] rfl
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
simp only [iselect_nil] at hrec
subst hrec
simp only [approx_mk, true_and_iff, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, zero_eq, CofixA.intro.injEq,
heq_eq_eq, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, and_self]
· cases hx
cases hy
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
subst z
iterate 3 (have := mk_inj ‹_›; cases this)
rename_i n_ih a f₃ f₂ hAgree₂ _ _ h₂ _ _ f₁ h₁ hAgree₁ clr
simp only [approx_mk, true_and_iff, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq]
have := mk_inj h₁
cases this; clear h₁
have := mk_inj h₂
cases this; clear h₂
congr
ext i
apply n_ih
· solve_by_elim
· solve_by_elim
introv h
specialize hrec (⟨_, i⟩ :: ps) (congr_arg _ h)
simp only [iselect_cons] at hrec
exact hrec
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.ext_aux PFunctor.M.ext_aux
open PFunctor.Approx
attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable
theorem ext [Inhabited (M F)] (x y : M F) (H : ∀ ps : Path F, iselect ps x = iselect ps y) :
x = y := by
apply ext'; intro i
induction' i with i i_ih
· cases x.approx 0
cases y.approx 0
constructor
· apply ext_aux x y x
· rw [← agree_iff_agree']
apply x.consistent
· rw [← agree_iff_agree', i_ih]
apply y.consistent
introv H'
dsimp only [iselect] at H
cases H'
apply H ps
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.ext PFunctor.M.ext
section Bisim
variable (R : M F → M F → Prop)
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimulation is the standard proof technique for equality between
infinite tree-like structures -/
structure IsBisimulation : Prop where
/-- The head of the trees are equal -/
head : ∀ {a a'} {f f'}, M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ~ M.mk ⟨a', f'⟩ → a = a'
/-- The tails are equal -/
tail : ∀ {a} {f f' : F.B a → M F}, M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ~ M.mk ⟨a, f'⟩ → ∀ i : F.B a, f i ~ f' i
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.is_bisimulation PFunctor.M.IsBisimulation
theorem nth_of_bisim [Inhabited (M F)] (bisim : IsBisimulation R) (s₁ s₂) (ps : Path F) :
(R s₁ s₂) →
IsPath ps s₁ ∨ IsPath ps s₂ →
iselect ps s₁ = iselect ps s₂ ∧
∃ (a : _) (f f' : F.B a → M F),
isubtree ps s₁ = M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ∧
isubtree ps s₂ = M.mk ⟨a, f'⟩ ∧ ∀ i : F.B a, f i ~ f' i := by
intro h₀ hh
induction' s₁ using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a f
induction' s₂ using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a' f'
obtain rfl : a = a' := bisim.head h₀
induction' ps with i ps ps_ih generalizing a f f'
· exists rfl, a, f, f', rfl, rfl
apply bisim.tail h₀
cases' i with a' i
obtain rfl : a = a' := by rcases hh with hh|hh <;> cases isPath_cons hh <;> rfl
dsimp only [iselect] at ps_ih ⊢
have h₁ := bisim.tail h₀ i
induction' h : f i using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a₀ f₀
induction' h' : f' i using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a₁ f₁
simp only [h, h', isubtree_cons] at ps_ih ⊢
rw [h, h'] at h₁
obtain rfl : a₀ = a₁ := bisim.head h₁
apply ps_ih _ _ _ h₁
rw [← h, ← h']
apply Or.imp isPath_cons' isPath_cons' hh
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.nth_of_bisim PFunctor.M.nth_of_bisim
theorem eq_of_bisim [Nonempty (M F)] (bisim : IsBisimulation R) : ∀ s₁ s₂, R s₁ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := by
inhabit M F
introv Hr; apply ext
introv
by_cases h : IsPath ps s₁ ∨ IsPath ps s₂
· have H := nth_of_bisim R bisim _ _ ps Hr h
exact H.left
· rw [not_or] at h
cases' h with h₀ h₁
simp only [iselect_eq_default, *, not_false_iff]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.eq_of_bisim PFunctor.M.eq_of_bisim
end Bisim
universe u' v'
/-- corecursor for `M F` with swapped arguments -/
def corecOn {X : Type*} (x₀ : X) (f : X → F X) : M F :=
M.corec f x₀
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pfunctor.M.corec_on PFunctor.M.corecOn
variable {P : PFunctor.{u}} {α : Type*}
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Univariate/M.lean | 715 | 716 | theorem dest_corec (g : α → P α) (x : α) : M.dest (M.corec g x) = P.map (M.corec g) (g x) := by |
rw [corec_def, dest_mk]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 292 | 302 | theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by |
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.projection from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b7c740e25651db0ba63648fbae9f9d6f941e31b"
/-!
# The orthogonal projection
Given a nonempty complete subspace `K` of an inner product space `E`, this file constructs
`orthogonalProjection K : E →L[𝕜] K`, the orthogonal projection of `E` onto `K`. This map
satisfies: for any point `u` in `E`, the point `v = orthogonalProjection K u` in `K` minimizes the
distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
Also a linear isometry equivalence `reflection K : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is constructed, by choosing, for
each `u : E`, the point `reflection K u` to satisfy
`u + (reflection K u) = 2 • orthogonalProjection K u`.
Basic API for `orthogonalProjection` and `reflection` is developed.
Next, the orthogonal projection is used to prove a series of more subtle lemmas about the
orthogonal complement of complete subspaces of `E` (the orthogonal complement itself was
defined in `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal`); the lemma
`Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace`, stating that for a complete subspace `K` of `E` we have
`K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤`, is a typical example.
## References
The orthogonal projection construction is adapted from
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
/-- Existence of minimizers
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [_root_.abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by continuity) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
have := le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
exact this
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
/-- Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superceded by `norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `RCLike` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : Submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (↑K : Set F), ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(by
intro h
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h
exacts [K.convex, hv]
intro w hw
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
let w' := w + v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
have h₂ : w' - v = w := by
simp only [w', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂] at h₁
exact h₁
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0 := by
let w'' := -w + v
have : w'' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv
have h₁ := h w'' this
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w := by
simp only [w'', neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁
linarith
exact le_antisymm le ge)
(by
intro h
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
intro w hw
let w' := w - v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
exact le_of_eq h₁
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero]
exacts [Submodule.convex _, hv])
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := K.restrictScalars ℝ
constructor
· intro H
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).1 H
intro w hw
apply ext
· simp [A w hw]
· symm
calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 := im.map_zero
_ = re ⟪u - v, (-I : 𝕜) • w⟫ := (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
_ = re (-I * ⟪u - v, w⟫) := by rw [inner_smul_right]
_ = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ := by simp
· intro H
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw]
exact zero_re'
exact (norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).2 this
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero
/-- A subspace `K : Submodule 𝕜 E` has an orthogonal projection if evey vector `v : E` admits an
orthogonal projection to `K`. -/
class HasOrthogonalProjection (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) : Prop where
exists_orthogonal (v : E) : ∃ w ∈ K, v - w ∈ Kᗮ
instance (priority := 100) HasOrthogonalProjection.ofCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace K] :
HasOrthogonalProjection K where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace K (completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.mp ‹_›) v
with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, hwK, (K.mem_orthogonal' _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [← norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero K hwK]
instance [HasOrthogonalProjection K] : HasOrthogonalProjection Kᗮ where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨_, hw, ?_⟩
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
exact K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hwK
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
HasOrthogonalProjection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) (f.symm v) with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨f w, Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hwK, Set.forall_mem_image.2 fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
erw [← f.symm.inner_map_map, f.symm_apply_apply, map_sub, f.symm_apply_apply, hw u hu]
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv' [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
HasOrthogonalProjection (K.map f.toLinearIsometry) :=
HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv K f
instance : HasOrthogonalProjection (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E) := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨v, trivial, by simp⟩⟩
section orthogonalProjection
variable [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonalProjection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonalProjectionFn (v : E) :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose
#align orthogonal_projection_fn orthogonalProjectionFn
variable {K}
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem (v : E) : orthogonalProjectionFn K v ∈ K :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.left
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_mem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal' _).1 (HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.right
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : orthogonalProjectionFn K u = v := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hvs : orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v ∈ K :=
Submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem u) hvm
have huo : ⟪u - orthogonalProjectionFn K u, orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs
have huv : ⟪u - v, orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs
have houv : ⟪u - v - (u - orthogonalProjectionFn K u), orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero]
rwa [sub_sub_sub_cancel_left] at houv
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
variable (K)
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq (v : E) :
‖v‖ * ‖v‖ =
‖v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ * ‖v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ +
‖orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ * ‖orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ := by
set p := orthogonalProjectionFn K v
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v)
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2 <;> simp
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_norm_sq orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. -/
def orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun v => ⟨orthogonalProjectionFn K v, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
have hm : orthogonalProjectionFn K x + orthogonalProjectionFn K y ∈ K :=
Submodule.add_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x) (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem y)
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (orthogonalProjectionFn K x + orthogonalProjectionFn K y), w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [add_sub_add_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
have hm : c • orthogonalProjectionFn K x ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x)
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • orthogonalProjectionFn K x, w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [← smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
mul_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho] }
1 fun x => by
simp only [one_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk]
refine le_of_pow_le_pow_left two_ne_zero (norm_nonneg _) ?_
change ‖orthogonalProjectionFn K x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2
nlinarith [orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq K x]
#align orthogonal_projection orthogonalProjection
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq (v : E) :
orthogonalProjectionFn K v = (orthogonalProjection K v : E) :=
rfl
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_eq orthogonalProjectionFn_eq
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonalProjection K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero v
#align orthogonal_projection_inner_eq_zero orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero
/-- The difference of `v` from its orthogonal projection onto `K` is in `Kᗮ`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v - orthogonalProjection K v ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ hw
#align sub_orthogonal_projection_mem_orthogonal sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K)
(hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv <| (Submodule.mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 hvo
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' {u v z : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu] )
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal' eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal'
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val (u : E) :
(orthogonalProjection Kᗮ u : E) = u - orthogonalProjection K u :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _)
(K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (orthogonalProjection K u).2) <| by simp
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (u : E) :
orthogonalProjection Kᗮ u =
⟨u - orthogonalProjection K u, sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _⟩ :=
Subtype.eq <| orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val _
/-- The orthogonal projection of `y` on `U` minimizes the distance `‖y - x‖` for `x ∈ U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_minimal {U : Submodule 𝕜 E} [HasOrthogonalProjection U] (y : E) :
‖y - orthogonalProjection U y‖ = ⨅ x : U, ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero _ (Submodule.coe_mem _)]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _
#align orthogonal_projection_minimal orthogonalProjection_minimal
/-- The orthogonal projections onto equal subspaces are coerced back to the same point in `E`. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule {K' : Submodule 𝕜 E} [HasOrthogonalProjection K']
(h : K = K') (u : E) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = (orthogonalProjection K' u : E) := by
subst h; rfl
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_eq_submodule eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule
/-- The orthogonal projection sends elements of `K` to themselves. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : orthogonalProjection K v = v := by
ext
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero <;> simp
#align orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_eq_self orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in the subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {v : E} : (orthogonalProjection K v : E) = v ↔ v ∈ K := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h ?_⟩
· rw [← h]
simp
· simp
#align orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff {v : E} : orthogonalProjection K v = 0 ↔ v ∈ Kᗮ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Subtype.eq <| eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
(zero_mem _) ?_⟩
· simpa [h] using sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (K := K) v
· simpa
@[simp]
theorem ker_orthogonalProjection : LinearMap.ker (orthogonalProjection K) = Kᗮ := by
ext; exact orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff
theorem LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] [HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap)]
(x : E) : f (orthogonalProjection p x) = orthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap) (f x) := by
refine (eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ fun y hy => ?_).symm
· refine Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map _ _
rcases hy with ⟨x', hx', rfl : f x' = y⟩
rw [← f.map_sub, f.inner_map_map, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x x' hx']
#align linear_isometry.map_orthogonal_projection LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection
theorem LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] [HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f)] (x : E) :
f (orthogonalProjection p x) = orthogonalProjection (p.map f) (f x) :=
have : HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap) := ‹_›
f.map_orthogonalProjection p x
#align linear_isometry.map_orthogonal_projection' LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection'
/-- Orthogonal projection onto the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] (x : E') :
(orthogonalProjection (p.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) x : E') =
f (orthogonalProjection p (f.symm x)) := by
simpa only [f.coe_toLinearIsometry, f.apply_symm_apply] using
(f.toLinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' p (f.symm x)).symm
#align orthogonal_projection_map_apply orthogonalProjection_map_apply
/-- The orthogonal projection onto the trivial submodule is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_bot : orthogonalProjection (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = 0 := by ext
#align orthogonal_projection_bot orthogonalProjection_bot
variable (K)
/-- The orthogonal projection has norm `≤ 1`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_norm_le : ‖orthogonalProjection K‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by norm_num) _
#align orthogonal_projection_norm_le orthogonalProjection_norm_le
variable (𝕜)
theorem smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜) • (orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
suffices ((orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) (((‖v‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • w)) : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v by
simpa using this
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
· rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
use ⟪v, w⟫
· rw [← Submodule.mem_orthogonal', Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
simp [inner_sub_left, inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, mul_comm]
#align smul_orthogonal_projection_singleton smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
(orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = (⟪v, w⟫ / ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • v := by
by_cases hv : v = 0
· rw [hv, eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule (Submodule.span_zero_singleton 𝕜)]
simp
have hv' : ‖v‖ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.mpr hv)
have key :
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • ((orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w) : E) =
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ⟪v, w⟫) • v := by
simp [mul_smul, smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w, -ofReal_pow]
convert key using 1 <;> field_simp [hv']
#align orthogonal_projection_singleton orthogonalProjection_singleton
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single unit vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : E) :
(orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
rw [← smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w]
simp [hv]
#align orthogonal_projection_unit_singleton orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton
end orthogonalProjection
section reflection
variable [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
-- Porting note: `bit0` is deprecated.
/-- Auxiliary definition for `reflection`: the reflection as a linear equivalence. -/
def reflectionLinearEquiv : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive
(2 • (K.subtype.comp (orthogonalProjection K).toLinearMap) - LinearMap.id) fun x => by
simp [two_smul]
#align reflection_linear_equiv reflectionLinearEquivₓ
/-- Reflection in a complete subspace of an inner product space. The word "reflection" is
sometimes understood to mean specifically reflection in a codimension-one subspace, and sometimes
more generally to cover operations such as reflection in a point. The definition here, of
reflection in a subspace, is a more general sense of the word that includes both those common
cases. -/
def reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E :=
{ reflectionLinearEquiv K with
norm_map' := by
intro x
dsimp only
let w : K := orthogonalProjection K x
let v := x - w
have : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0 := orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x w w.2
convert norm_sub_eq_norm_add this using 2
· rw [LinearEquiv.coe_mk, reflectionLinearEquiv, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_ofInvolutive, LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, two_smul,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply, Submodule.subtype_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
dsimp [v]
abel
· simp only [v, add_sub_cancel, eq_self_iff_true] }
#align reflection reflection
variable {K}
/-- The result of reflecting. -/
theorem reflection_apply (p : E) : reflection K p = 2 • (orthogonalProjection K p : E) - p :=
rfl
#align reflection_apply reflection_applyₓ
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_symm : (reflection K).symm = reflection K :=
rfl
#align reflection_symm reflection_symm
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_inv : (reflection K)⁻¹ = reflection K :=
rfl
#align reflection_inv reflection_inv
variable (K)
/-- Reflecting twice in the same subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_reflection (p : E) : reflection K (reflection K p) = p :=
(reflection K).left_inv p
#align reflection_reflection reflection_reflection
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
theorem reflection_involutive : Function.Involutive (reflection K) :=
reflection_reflection K
#align reflection_involutive reflection_involutive
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_trans_reflection :
(reflection K).trans (reflection K) = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl 𝕜 E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_involutive K
#align reflection_trans_reflection reflection_trans_reflection
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_mul_reflection : reflection K * reflection K = 1 :=
reflection_trans_reflection _
#align reflection_mul_reflection reflection_mul_reflection
theorem reflection_orthogonal_apply (v : E) : reflection Kᗮ v = -reflection K v := by
simp [reflection_apply]; abel
theorem reflection_orthogonal : reflection Kᗮ = .trans (reflection K) (.neg _) := by
ext; apply reflection_orthogonal_apply
variable {K}
theorem reflection_singleton_apply (u v : E) :
reflection (𝕜 ∙ u) v = 2 • (⟪u, v⟫ / ((‖u‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2)) • u - v := by
rw [reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_singleton, ofReal_pow]
/-- A point is its own reflection if and only if it is in the subspace. -/
theorem reflection_eq_self_iff (x : E) : reflection K x = x ↔ x ∈ K := by
rw [← orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff, reflection_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← two_smul 𝕜,
two_smul ℕ, ← two_smul 𝕜]
refine (smul_right_injective E ?_).eq_iff
exact two_ne_zero
#align reflection_eq_self_iff reflection_eq_self_iff
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self {x : E} (hx : x ∈ K) : reflection K x = x :=
(reflection_eq_self_iff x).mpr hx
#align reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 756 | 760 | theorem reflection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[HasOrthogonalProjection K] (x : E') :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) x = f (reflection K (f.symm x)) := by |
simp [two_smul, reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_map_apply f K x]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.PDeriv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.bernstein from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
/-!
# Bernstein polynomials
The definition of the Bernstein polynomials
```
bernsteinPolynomial (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)
```
and the fact that for `ν : fin (n+1)` these are linearly independent over `ℚ`.
We prove the basic identities
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = 1`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ ν • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = n • X`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ (ν * (ν-1)) • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = (n * (n-1)) • X^2`
## Notes
See also `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Bernstein`, which defines the Bernstein approximations
of a continuous function `f : C([0,1], ℝ)`, and shows that these converge uniformly to `f`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat (choose)
open Polynomial (X)
open scoped Polynomial
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-- `bernsteinPolynomial R n ν` is `(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)`.
Although the coefficients are integers, it is convenient to work over an arbitrary commutative ring.
-/
def bernsteinPolynomial (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν : R[X]) * X ^ ν * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν)
#align bernstein_polynomial bernsteinPolynomial
example : bernsteinPolynomial ℤ 3 2 = 3 * X ^ 2 - 3 * X ^ 3 := by
norm_num [bernsteinPolynomial, choose]
ring
namespace bernsteinPolynomial
theorem eq_zero_of_lt {n ν : ℕ} (h : n < ν) : bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = 0 := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]
#align bernstein_polynomial.eq_zero_of_lt bernsteinPolynomial.eq_zero_of_lt
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map (f : R →+* S) (n ν : ℕ) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).map f = bernsteinPolynomial S n ν := by simp [bernsteinPolynomial]
#align bernstein_polynomial.map bernsteinPolynomial.map
end
theorem flip (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).comp (1 - X) = bernsteinPolynomial R n (n - ν) := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, h, tsub_tsub_assoc, mul_right_comm]
#align bernstein_polynomial.flip bernsteinPolynomial.flip
theorem flip' (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = (bernsteinPolynomial R n (n - ν)).comp (1 - X) := by
simp [← flip _ _ _ h, Polynomial.comp_assoc]
#align bernstein_polynomial.flip' bernsteinPolynomial.flip'
theorem eval_at_0 (n ν : ℕ) : (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).eval 0 = if ν = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· simp [zero_pow h]
#align bernstein_polynomial.eval_at_0 bernsteinPolynomial.eval_at_0
theorem eval_at_1 (n ν : ℕ) : (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).eval 1 = if ν = n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· obtain hνn | hnν := Ne.lt_or_lt h
· simp [zero_pow $ Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hνn]
· simp [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnν]
#align bernstein_polynomial.eval_at_1 bernsteinPolynomial.eval_at_1
theorem derivative_succ_aux (n ν : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative (bernsteinPolynomial R (n + 1) (ν + 1)) =
(n + 1) * (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν - bernsteinPolynomial R n (ν + 1)) := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial]
suffices ((n + 1).choose (ν + 1) : R[X]) * ((↑(ν + 1 : ℕ) : R[X]) * X ^ ν) * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν) -
((n + 1).choose (ν + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ (ν + 1) * ((↑(n - ν) : R[X]) * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν - 1)) =
(↑(n + 1) : R[X]) * ((n.choose ν : R[X]) * X ^ ν * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν) -
(n.choose (ν + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ (ν + 1) * (1 - X) ^ (n - (ν + 1))) by
simpa [Polynomial.derivative_pow, ← sub_eq_add_neg, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Polynomial.derivative_mul, Polynomial.derivative_natCast, zero_mul,
Nat.cast_add, algebraMap.coe_one, Polynomial.derivative_X, mul_one, zero_add,
Polynomial.derivative_sub, Polynomial.derivative_one, zero_sub, mul_neg, Nat.sub_zero,
bernsteinPolynomial, map_add, map_natCast, Nat.cast_one]
conv_rhs => rw [mul_sub]
-- We'll prove the two terms match up separately.
refine congr (congr_arg Sub.sub ?_) ?_
· simp only [← mul_assoc]
apply congr (congr_arg (· * ·) (congr (congr_arg (· * ·) _) rfl)) rfl
-- Now it's just about binomial coefficients
exact mod_cast congr_arg (fun m : ℕ => (m : R[X])) (Nat.succ_mul_choose_eq n ν).symm
· rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; congr 1
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; congr 1
norm_cast
congr 1
convert (Nat.choose_mul_succ_eq n (ν + 1)).symm using 1
· -- Porting note: was
-- convert mul_comm _ _ using 2
-- simp
rw [mul_comm, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
· apply mul_comm
#align bernstein_polynomial.derivative_succ_aux bernsteinPolynomial.derivative_succ_aux
theorem derivative_succ (n ν : ℕ) : Polynomial.derivative (bernsteinPolynomial R n (ν + 1)) =
n * (bernsteinPolynomial R (n - 1) ν - bernsteinPolynomial R (n - 1) (ν + 1)) := by
cases n
· simp [bernsteinPolynomial]
· rw [Nat.cast_succ]; apply derivative_succ_aux
#align bernstein_polynomial.derivative_succ bernsteinPolynomial.derivative_succ
theorem derivative_zero (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative (bernsteinPolynomial R n 0) = -n * bernsteinPolynomial R (n - 1) 0 := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, Polynomial.derivative_pow]
#align bernstein_polynomial.derivative_zero bernsteinPolynomial.derivative_zero
theorem iterate_derivative_at_0_eq_zero_of_lt (n : ℕ) {ν k : ℕ} :
k < ν → (Polynomial.derivative^[k] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 0 = 0 := by
cases' ν with ν
· rintro ⟨⟩
· rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff]
induction' k with k ih generalizing n ν
· simp [eval_at_0]
· simp only [derivative_succ, Int.natCast_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, Function.comp_apply,
Function.iterate_succ, Polynomial.iterate_derivative_sub,
Polynomial.iterate_derivative_natCast_mul, Polynomial.eval_mul, Polynomial.eval_natCast,
Polynomial.eval_sub]
intro h
apply mul_eq_zero_of_right
rw [ih _ _ (Nat.le_of_succ_le h), sub_zero]
convert ih _ _ (Nat.pred_le_pred h)
exact (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (k.succ_pos.trans_le h)).symm
#align bernstein_polynomial.iterate_derivative_at_0_eq_zero_of_lt bernsteinPolynomial.iterate_derivative_at_0_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_succ_at_0_eq_zero (n ν : ℕ) :
(Polynomial.derivative^[ν] (bernsteinPolynomial R n (ν + 1))).eval 0 = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_at_0_eq_zero_of_lt R n (lt_add_one ν)
#align bernstein_polynomial.iterate_derivative_succ_at_0_eq_zero bernsteinPolynomial.iterate_derivative_succ_at_0_eq_zero
open Polynomial
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_at_0 (n ν : ℕ) :
(Polynomial.derivative^[ν] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 0 =
(ascPochhammer R ν).eval ((n - (ν - 1) : ℕ) : R) := by
by_cases h : ν ≤ n
· induction' ν with ν ih generalizing n
· simp [eval_at_0]
· have h' : ν ≤ n - 1 := le_tsub_of_add_le_right h
simp only [derivative_succ, ih (n - 1) h', iterate_derivative_succ_at_0_eq_zero,
Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, sub_zero, iterate_derivative_sub,
iterate_derivative_natCast_mul, eval_one, eval_mul, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_comp,
eval_natCast, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ, ascPochhammer_succ_left]
obtain rfl | h'' := ν.eq_zero_or_pos
· simp
· have : n - 1 - (ν - 1) = n - ν := by
rw [gt_iff_lt, ← Nat.succ_le_iff] at h''
rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h'']
rw [this, ascPochhammer_eval_succ]
rw_mod_cast [tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h'.trans n.pred_le)]
· simp only [not_le] at h
rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt h), eq_zero_of_lt R h]
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero.mp (pos_of_gt h)]
#align bernstein_polynomial.iterate_derivative_at_0 bernsteinPolynomial.iterate_derivative_at_0
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Bernstein.lean | 196 | 205 | theorem iterate_derivative_at_0_ne_zero [CharZero R] (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
(Polynomial.derivative^[ν] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 0 ≠ 0 := by |
simp only [Int.natCast_eq_zero, bernsteinPolynomial.iterate_derivative_at_0, Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero]
simp only [← ascPochhammer_eval_cast]
norm_cast
apply ne_of_gt
obtain rfl | h' := Nat.eq_zero_or_pos ν
· simp
· rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h'] at h
exact ascPochhammer_pos _ _ (tsub_pos_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_le h))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ModularLattice
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
#align_import order.atoms from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"422e70f7ce183d2900c586a8cda8381e788a0c62"
/-!
# Atoms, Coatoms, and Simple Lattices
This module defines atoms, which are minimal non-`⊥` elements in bounded lattices, simple lattices,
which are lattices with only two elements, and related ideas.
## Main definitions
### Atoms and Coatoms
* `IsAtom a` indicates that the only element below `a` is `⊥`.
* `IsCoatom a` indicates that the only element above `a` is `⊤`.
### Atomic and Atomistic Lattices
* `IsAtomic` indicates that every element other than `⊥` is above an atom.
* `IsCoatomic` indicates that every element other than `⊤` is below a coatom.
* `IsAtomistic` indicates that every element is the `sSup` of a set of atoms.
* `IsCoatomistic` indicates that every element is the `sInf` of a set of coatoms.
### Simple Lattices
* `IsSimpleOrder` indicates that an order has only two unique elements, `⊥` and `⊤`.
* `IsSimpleOrder.boundedOrder`
* `IsSimpleOrder.distribLattice`
* Given an instance of `IsSimpleOrder`, we provide the following definitions. These are not
made global instances as they contain data :
* `IsSimpleOrder.booleanAlgebra`
* `IsSimpleOrder.completeLattice`
* `IsSimpleOrder.completeBooleanAlgebra`
## Main results
* `isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom` and `isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom` express the (definitional) duality
of `IsAtom` and `IsCoatom`.
* `isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top` and `isSimpleOrder_iff_isCoatom_bot` express the
connection between atoms, coatoms, and simple lattices
* `IsCompl.isAtom_iff_isCoatom` and `IsCompl.isCoatom_if_isAtom`: In a modular
bounded lattice, a complement of an atom is a coatom and vice versa.
* `isAtomic_iff_isCoatomic`: A modular complemented lattice is atomic iff it is coatomic.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
variable {α β : Type*}
section Atoms
section IsAtom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a b x : α}
/-- An atom of an `OrderBot` is an element with no other element between it and `⊥`,
which is not `⊥`. -/
def IsAtom (a : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b, b < a → b = ⊥
#align is_atom IsAtom
theorem IsAtom.Iic (ha : IsAtom a) (hax : a ≤ x) : IsAtom (⟨a, hax⟩ : Set.Iic x) :=
⟨fun con => ha.1 (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 con), fun ⟨b, _⟩ hba => Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 (ha.2 b hba)⟩
#align is_atom.Iic IsAtom.Iic
theorem IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic {a : Set.Iic x} (ha : IsAtom a) : IsAtom (a : α) :=
⟨fun con => ha.1 (Subtype.ext con), fun b hba =>
Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 (ha.2 ⟨b, hba.le.trans a.prop⟩ hba)⟩
#align is_atom.of_is_atom_coe_Iic IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic
theorem isAtom_iff_le_of_ge : IsAtom a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b ≠ ⊥, b ≤ a → a ≤ b :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
forall_congr' fun b => by
simp only [Ne, @not_imp_comm (b = ⊥), Classical.not_imp, lt_iff_le_not_le]
#align is_atom_iff isAtom_iff_le_of_ge
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b x : α}
theorem IsAtom.lt_iff (h : IsAtom a) : x < a ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨h.2 x, fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h.1.bot_lt⟩
#align is_atom.lt_iff IsAtom.lt_iff
theorem IsAtom.le_iff (h : IsAtom a) : x ≤ a ↔ x = ⊥ ∨ x = a := by rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, h.lt_iff]
#align is_atom.le_iff IsAtom.le_iff
lemma IsAtom.le_iff_eq (ha : IsAtom a) (hb : b ≠ ⊥) : b ≤ a ↔ b = a :=
ha.le_iff.trans <| or_iff_right hb
theorem IsAtom.Iic_eq (h : IsAtom a) : Set.Iic a = {⊥, a} :=
Set.ext fun _ => h.le_iff
#align is_atom.Iic_eq IsAtom.Iic_eq
@[simp]
theorem bot_covBy_iff : ⊥ ⋖ a ↔ IsAtom a := by
simp only [CovBy, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, IsAtom, not_imp_not]
#align bot_covby_iff bot_covBy_iff
alias ⟨CovBy.is_atom, IsAtom.bot_covBy⟩ := bot_covBy_iff
#align covby.is_atom CovBy.is_atom
#align is_atom.bot_covby IsAtom.bot_covBy
end PartialOrder
theorem atom_le_iSup [Order.Frame α] (ha : IsAtom a) {f : ι → α} :
a ≤ iSup f ↔ ∃ i, a ≤ f i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => le_trans hi (le_iSup _ _)⟩
show (a ≤ ⨆ i, f i) → _
refine fun h => of_not_not fun ha' => ?_
push_neg at ha'
have ha'' : Disjoint a (⨆ i, f i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff.2 fun i => fun x hxa hxf => le_bot_iff.2 <| of_not_not fun hx =>
have hxa : x < a := (le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hxa).resolve_left (by rintro rfl; exact ha' _ hxf)
hx (ha.2 _ hxa)
obtain rfl := le_bot_iff.1 (ha'' le_rfl h)
exact ha.1 rfl
end IsAtom
section IsCoatom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A coatom of an `OrderTop` is an element with no other element between it and `⊤`,
which is not `⊤`. -/
def IsCoatom [OrderTop α] (a : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ b, a < b → b = ⊤
#align is_coatom IsCoatom
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom [OrderBot α] {a : α} :
IsCoatom (OrderDual.toDual a) ↔ IsAtom a :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_coatom_dual_iff_is_atom isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom
@[simp]
theorem isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom [OrderTop α] {a : α} :
IsAtom (OrderDual.toDual a) ↔ IsCoatom a :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_atom_dual_iff_is_coatom isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom
alias ⟨_, IsAtom.dual⟩ := isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom
#align is_atom.dual IsAtom.dual
alias ⟨_, IsCoatom.dual⟩ := isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom
#align is_coatom.dual IsCoatom.dual
variable [OrderTop α] {a x : α}
theorem IsCoatom.Ici (ha : IsCoatom a) (hax : x ≤ a) : IsCoatom (⟨a, hax⟩ : Set.Ici x) :=
ha.dual.Iic hax
#align is_coatom.Ici IsCoatom.Ici
theorem IsCoatom.of_isCoatom_coe_Ici {a : Set.Ici x} (ha : IsCoatom a) : IsCoatom (a : α) :=
@IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ x a ha
#align is_coatom.of_is_coatom_coe_Ici IsCoatom.of_isCoatom_coe_Ici
theorem isCoatom_iff_ge_of_le : IsCoatom a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ b ≠ ⊤, a ≤ b → b ≤ a :=
isAtom_iff_le_of_ge (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align is_coatom_iff isCoatom_iff_ge_of_le
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a b x : α}
theorem IsCoatom.lt_iff (h : IsCoatom a) : a < x ↔ x = ⊤ :=
h.dual.lt_iff
#align is_coatom.lt_iff IsCoatom.lt_iff
theorem IsCoatom.le_iff (h : IsCoatom a) : a ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ ∨ x = a :=
h.dual.le_iff
#align is_coatom.le_iff IsCoatom.le_iff
lemma IsCoatom.le_iff_eq (ha : IsCoatom a) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : a ≤ b ↔ b = a := ha.dual.le_iff_eq hb
theorem IsCoatom.Ici_eq (h : IsCoatom a) : Set.Ici a = {⊤, a} :=
h.dual.Iic_eq
#align is_coatom.Ici_eq IsCoatom.Ici_eq
@[simp]
theorem covBy_top_iff : a ⋖ ⊤ ↔ IsCoatom a :=
toDual_covBy_toDual_iff.symm.trans bot_covBy_iff
#align covby_top_iff covBy_top_iff
alias ⟨CovBy.isCoatom, IsCoatom.covBy_top⟩ := covBy_top_iff
#align covby.is_coatom CovBy.isCoatom
#align is_coatom.covby_top IsCoatom.covBy_top
end PartialOrder
theorem iInf_le_coatom [Order.Coframe α] (ha : IsCoatom a) {f : ι → α} :
iInf f ≤ a ↔ ∃ i, f i ≤ a :=
atom_le_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
end IsCoatom
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Atoms.lean | 218 | 221 | theorem Set.Ici.isAtom_iff {b : Set.Ici a} : IsAtom b ↔ a ⋖ b := by |
rw [← bot_covBy_iff]
refine (Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderEmbedding.subtype fun c => a ≤ c) ?_).symm
simpa only [OrderEmbedding.subtype_apply, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using Set.ordConnected_Ici
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
/-!
# Generalities on the polynomial structure of rational functions
## Main definitions
- `RatFunc.C` is the constant polynomial
- `RatFunc.X` is the indeterminate
- `RatFunc.eval` evaluates a rational function given a value for the indeterminate
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Eval
open scoped Classical
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
open RatFunc
/-! ### Polynomial structure: `C`, `X`, `eval` -/
section Domain
variable [CommRing K] [IsDomain K]
/-- `RatFunc.C a` is the constant rational function `a`. -/
def C : K →+* RatFunc K := algebraMap _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.C RatFunc.C
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq_C : algebraMap K (RatFunc K) = C :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.algebra_map_eq_C RatFunc.algebraMap_eq_C
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_C (a : K) : algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) (Polynomial.C a) = C a :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.algebra_map_C RatFunc.algebraMap_C
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_comp_C : (algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)).comp Polynomial.C = C :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.algebra_map_comp_C RatFunc.algebraMap_comp_C
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (r : K) (x : RatFunc K) : r • x = C r * x := by
rw [Algebra.smul_def, algebraMap_eq_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.smul_eq_C_mul RatFunc.smul_eq_C_mul
/-- `RatFunc.X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : RatFunc K :=
algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) Polynomial.X
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.X RatFunc.X
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_X : algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) Polynomial.X = X :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.algebra_map_X RatFunc.algebraMap_X
end Domain
section Field
variable [Field K]
@[simp]
theorem num_C (c : K) : num (C c) = Polynomial.C c :=
num_algebraMap _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.num_C RatFunc.num_C
@[simp]
theorem denom_C (c : K) : denom (C c) = 1 :=
denom_algebraMap _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.denom_C RatFunc.denom_C
@[simp]
theorem num_X : num (X : RatFunc K) = Polynomial.X :=
num_algebraMap _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.num_X RatFunc.num_X
@[simp]
theorem denom_X : denom (X : RatFunc K) = 1 :=
denom_algebraMap _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.denom_X RatFunc.denom_X
theorem X_ne_zero : (X : RatFunc K) ≠ 0 :=
RatFunc.algebraMap_ne_zero Polynomial.X_ne_zero
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.X_ne_zero RatFunc.X_ne_zero
variable {L : Type u} [Field L]
/-- Evaluate a rational function `p` given a ring hom `f` from the scalar field
to the target and a value `x` for the variable in the target.
Fractions are reduced by clearing common denominators before evaluating:
`eval id 1 ((X^2 - 1) / (X - 1)) = eval id 1 (X + 1) = 2`, not `0 / 0 = 0`.
-/
def eval (f : K →+* L) (a : L) (p : RatFunc K) : L :=
(num p).eval₂ f a / (denom p).eval₂ f a
#align ratfunc.eval RatFunc.eval
variable {f : K →+* L} {a : L}
theorem eval_eq_zero_of_eval₂_denom_eq_zero {x : RatFunc K}
(h : Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom x) = 0) : eval f a x = 0 := by rw [eval, h, div_zero]
#align ratfunc.eval_eq_zero_of_eval₂_denom_eq_zero RatFunc.eval_eq_zero_of_eval₂_denom_eq_zero
theorem eval₂_denom_ne_zero {x : RatFunc K} (h : eval f a x ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom x) ≠ 0 :=
mt eval_eq_zero_of_eval₂_denom_eq_zero h
#align ratfunc.eval₂_denom_ne_zero RatFunc.eval₂_denom_ne_zero
variable (f a)
@[simp]
theorem eval_C {c : K} : eval f a (C c) = f c := by simp [eval]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.eval_C RatFunc.eval_C
@[simp]
theorem eval_X : eval f a X = a := by simp [eval]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.eval_X RatFunc.eval_X
@[simp]
theorem eval_zero : eval f a 0 = 0 := by simp [eval]
#align ratfunc.eval_zero RatFunc.eval_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval_one : eval f a 1 = 1 := by simp [eval]
#align ratfunc.eval_one RatFunc.eval_one
@[simp]
theorem eval_algebraMap {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] (p : S) :
eval f a (algebraMap _ _ p) = (algebraMap _ K[X] p).eval₂ f a := by
simp [eval, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply S K[X] (RatFunc K)]
#align ratfunc.eval_algebra_map RatFunc.eval_algebraMap
/-- `eval` is an additive homomorphism except when a denominator evaluates to `0`.
Counterexample: `eval _ 1 (X / (X-1)) + eval _ 1 (-1 / (X-1)) = 0`
`... ≠ 1 = eval _ 1 ((X-1) / (X-1))`.
See also `RatFunc.eval₂_denom_ne_zero` to make the hypotheses simpler but less general.
-/
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/AsPolynomial.lean | 159 | 170 | theorem eval_add {x y : RatFunc K} (hx : Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom x) ≠ 0)
(hy : Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom y) ≠ 0) : eval f a (x + y) = eval f a x + eval f a y := by |
unfold eval
by_cases hxy : Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom (x + y)) = 0
· have := Polynomial.eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero f a (denom_add_dvd x y) hxy
rw [Polynomial.eval₂_mul] at this
cases mul_eq_zero.mp this <;> contradiction
rw [div_add_div _ _ hx hy, eq_div_iff (mul_ne_zero hx hy), div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm, ←
div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_iff hxy]
simp only [← Polynomial.eval₂_mul, ← Polynomial.eval₂_add]
congr 1
apply num_denom_add
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives
This file defines the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` where `𝕜` is a
normed field and `F` is a normed space over this field. The derivative of
such a function `f` at a point `x` is given by an element `f' : F`.
The theory is developed analogously to the [Fréchet
derivatives](./fderiv.html). We first introduce predicates defined in terms
of the corresponding predicates for Fréchet derivatives:
- `HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
- `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
- `HasDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x`.
- `HasStrictDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability, i.e.,
`f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o (y - z)` as `y, z → x`.
For the last two notions we also define a functional version:
- `derivWithin f s x` is a derivative of `f` at `x` within `s`. If the
derivative does not exist, then `derivWithin f s x` equals zero.
- `deriv f x` is a derivative of `f` at `x`. If the derivative does not
exist, then `deriv f x` equals zero.
The theorems `fderivWithin_derivWithin` and `fderiv_deriv` show that the
one-dimensional derivatives coincide with the general Fréchet derivatives.
We also show the existence and compute the derivatives of:
- constants
- the identity function
- linear maps (in `Linear.lean`)
- addition (in `Add.lean`)
- sum of finitely many functions (in `Add.lean`)
- negation (in `Add.lean`)
- subtraction (in `Add.lean`)
- star (in `Star.lean`)
- multiplication of two functions in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Mul.lean`)
- multiplication of a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` and of a function in `𝕜 → E` (in `Mul.lean`)
- powers of a function (in `Pow.lean` and `ZPow.lean`)
- inverse `x → x⁻¹` (in `Inv.lean`)
- division (in `Inv.lean`)
- composition of a function in `𝕜 → F` with a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Comp.lean`)
- composition of a function in `F → E` with a function in `𝕜 → F` (in `Comp.lean`)
- inverse function (assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `Inverse.lean`)
- polynomials (in `Polynomial.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
We set up the simplifier so that it can compute the derivative of simple functions. For instance,
```lean
example (x : ℝ) :
deriv (fun x ↦ cos (sin x) * exp x) x = (cos(sin(x))-sin(sin(x))*cos(x))*exp(x) := by
simp; ring
```
The relationship between the derivative of a function and its definition from a standard
undergraduate course as the limit of the slope `(f y - f x) / (y - x)` as `y` tends to `𝓝[≠] x`
is developed in the file `Slope.lean`.
## Implementation notes
Most of the theorems are direct restatements of the corresponding theorems
for Fréchet derivatives.
The strategy to construct simp lemmas that give the simplifier the possibility to compute
derivatives is the same as the one for differentiability statements, as explained in
`FDeriv/Basic.lean`. See the explanations there.
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges along the filter `L`.
-/
def HasDerivAtFilter (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) (L : Filter 𝕜) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x L
#align has_deriv_at_filter HasDerivAtFilter
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def HasDerivWithinAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
#align has_deriv_within_at HasDerivWithinAt
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def HasDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
#align has_deriv_at HasDerivAt
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability.
That is, `f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. -/
def HasStrictDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x
#align has_strict_deriv_at HasStrictDerivAt
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • derivWithin f s x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def derivWithin (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x 1
#align deriv_within derivWithin
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivAt f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv f x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def deriv (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderiv 𝕜 f x 1
#align deriv deriv
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L` in terms of `HasDerivAtFilter` -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L := by simp [HasDerivAtFilter]
#align has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_has_deriv_at_filter hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L → HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter.mp
#align has_fderiv_at_filter.has_deriv_at_filter HasFDerivAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_fderiv_within_at_iff_has_deriv_within_at hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt
/-- Expressing `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasFDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_has_fderiv_within_at hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt.mp
#align has_fderiv_within_at.has_deriv_within_at HasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt.mp
#align has_deriv_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at HasDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasDerivAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_fderiv_at_iff_has_deriv_at hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x → HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt.mp
#align has_fderiv_at.has_deriv_at HasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x := by
simp [HasStrictDerivAt, HasStrictFDerivAt]
#align has_strict_fderiv_at_iff_has_strict_deriv_at hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x → HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt.mp
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.has_strict_deriv_at HasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt :
HasStrictDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_strict_deriv_at_iff_has_strict_fderiv_at hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasStrictDerivAt.hasStrictFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt
#align has_strict_deriv_at.has_strict_fderiv_at HasStrictDerivAt.hasStrictFDerivAt
/-- Expressing `HasDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasFDerivAt` -/
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasDerivAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
#align has_deriv_at.has_fderiv_at HasDerivAt.hasFDerivAt
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h]
simp
#align deriv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_of_derivWithin_ne_zero (h : derivWithin f s x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
not_imp_comm.1 derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h
#align differentiable_within_at_of_deriv_within_ne_zero differentiableWithinAt_of_derivWithin_ne_zero
theorem deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : deriv f x = 0 := by
unfold deriv
rw [fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h]
simp
#align deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt
theorem differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h : deriv f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
not_imp_comm.1 deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h
#align differentiable_at_of_deriv_ne_zero differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq_deriv (s : Set 𝕜) (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h₁ : HasDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq H h h₁
#align unique_diff_within_at.eq_deriv UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq_deriv
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_at_filter_iff_is_o hasDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' : 𝕜 => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) L (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
(fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝[s] x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_is_o hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝 x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_at_iff_is_o hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_at_iff_tendsto hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_deriv_at_filter.is_O_sub HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hf' : f' ≠ 0) :
(fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
suffices AntilipschitzWith ‖f'‖₊⁻¹ (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') from hf.isBigO_sub_rev this
AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') fun x => by
simp [norm_smul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (mt norm_eq_zero.1 hf')]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_deriv_at_filter.is_O_sub_rev HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivAt f f' x :=
h.hasFDerivAt
#align has_strict_deriv_at.has_deriv_at HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set' {s t : Set 𝕜} (y : 𝕜) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' y h
#align has_deriv_within_at_congr_set' hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set'
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set {s t : Set 𝕜} (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
#align has_deriv_within_at_congr_set hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.congr_set, _⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
#align has_deriv_within_at.congr_set HasDerivWithinAt.congr_set
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {x}) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _
#align has_deriv_within_at_diff_singleton hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
#align has_deriv_within_at_Ioi_iff_Ici hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ici_of_Ioi HasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_of_Ici HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iio x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iic x) x := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
#align has_deriv_within_at_Iio_iff_Iic hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Iic_of_Iio, HasDerivWithinAt.Iio_of_Iic⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic
#align has_deriv_within_at.Iic_of_Iio HasDerivWithinAt.Iic_of_Iio
#align has_deriv_within_at.Iio_of_Iic HasDerivWithinAt.Iio_of_Iic
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo [LinearOrder 𝕜] [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] {x y : 𝕜} (h : x < y) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioo x y) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter <| Iio_mem_nhds h
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_iff_Ioo HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ioo, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioo_of_Ioi⟩ := HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_of_Ioo HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ioo
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioo_of_Ioi HasDerivWithinAt.Ioo_of_Ioi
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h => f (x + h) - f x - h • f') =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
#align has_deriv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.mono h hst
#align has_deriv_at_filter.mono HasDerivAtFilter.mono
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.mono HasDerivWithinAt.mono
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem h hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.mono_of_mem HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem
#align has_deriv_within_at.nhds_within HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem
theorem HasDerivAt.hasDerivAtFilter (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter h hL
#align has_deriv_at.has_deriv_at_filter HasDerivAt.hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_at.has_deriv_within_at HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_within_at.differentiable_within_at HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt h
#align has_deriv_at.differentiable_at HasDerivAt.differentiableAt
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_univ : HasDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
#align has_deriv_within_at_univ hasDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem HasDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| h₀.hasFDerivAt.unique h₁
#align has_deriv_at.unique HasDerivAt.unique
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' h
#align has_deriv_within_at_inter' hasDerivWithinAt_inter'
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter h
#align has_deriv_within_at_inter hasDerivWithinAt_inter
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (ht : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x :=
hs.hasFDerivWithinAt.union ht.hasFDerivWithinAt
#align has_deriv_within_at.union HasDerivWithinAt.union
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAt f f' x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt h hs
#align has_deriv_within_at.has_deriv_at HasDerivWithinAt.hasDerivAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f s x) s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt
#align differentiable_at.has_deriv_at DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_deriv_iff : HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableAt, fun h => h.hasDerivAt⟩
#align has_deriv_at_deriv_iff hasDerivAt_deriv_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_derivWithin_iff :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f s x) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableWithinAt, fun h => h.hasDerivWithinAt⟩
#align has_deriv_within_at_deriv_within_iff hasDerivWithinAt_derivWithin_iff
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasDerivAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasDerivAt
#align differentiable_on.has_deriv_at DifferentiableOn.hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.deriv (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : deriv f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasDerivAt.unique h
#align has_deriv_at.deriv HasDerivAt.deriv
theorem deriv_eq {f' : 𝕜 → F} (h : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) : deriv f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).deriv
#align deriv_eq deriv_eq
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : derivWithin f s x = f' :=
hxs.eq_deriv _ h.differentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within HasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin
theorem fderivWithin_derivWithin : (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = derivWithin f s x :=
rfl
#align fderiv_within_deriv_within fderivWithin_derivWithin
theorem derivWithin_fderivWithin :
smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (derivWithin f s x) = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by simp [derivWithin]
#align deriv_within_fderiv_within derivWithin_fderivWithin
theorem norm_derivWithin_eq_norm_fderivWithin : ‖derivWithin f s x‖ = ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖ := by
simp [← derivWithin_fderivWithin]
theorem fderiv_deriv : (fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = deriv f x :=
rfl
#align fderiv_deriv fderiv_deriv
theorem deriv_fderiv : smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (deriv f x) = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by simp [deriv]
#align deriv_fderiv deriv_fderiv
theorem norm_deriv_eq_norm_fderiv : ‖deriv f x‖ = ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖ := by
simp [← deriv_fderiv]
theorem DifferentiableAt.derivWithin (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin f s x = deriv f x := by
unfold derivWithin deriv
rw [h.fderivWithin hxs]
#align differentiable_at.deriv_within DifferentiableAt.derivWithin
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.deriv_eq_zero (hd : HasDerivWithinAt f 0 s x)
(H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : deriv f x = 0 :=
(em' (DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)).elim deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt fun h =>
H.eq_deriv _ h.hasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt hd
#align has_deriv_within_at.deriv_eq_zero HasDerivWithinAt.deriv_eq_zero
theorem derivWithin_of_mem (st : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) (ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) : derivWithin f s x = derivWithin f t x :=
((DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h).mono_of_mem st).derivWithin ht
#align deriv_within_of_mem derivWithin_of_mem
theorem derivWithin_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) : derivWithin f s x = derivWithin f t x :=
((DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h).mono st).derivWithin ht
#align deriv_within_subset derivWithin_subset
theorem derivWithin_congr_set' (y : 𝕜) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
derivWithin f s x = derivWithin f t x := by simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_congr_set' y h]
#align deriv_within_congr_set' derivWithin_congr_set'
theorem derivWithin_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : derivWithin f s x = derivWithin f t x := by
simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_congr_set h]
#align deriv_within_congr_set derivWithin_congr_set
@[simp]
theorem derivWithin_univ : derivWithin f univ = deriv f := by
ext
unfold derivWithin deriv
rw [fderivWithin_univ]
#align deriv_within_univ derivWithin_univ
theorem derivWithin_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) : derivWithin f (s ∩ t) x = derivWithin f s x := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [fderivWithin_inter ht]
#align deriv_within_inter derivWithin_inter
theorem derivWithin_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : derivWithin f s x = deriv f x := by
simp only [derivWithin, deriv, fderivWithin_of_mem_nhds h]
theorem derivWithin_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) : derivWithin f s x = deriv f x :=
derivWithin_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx)
#align deriv_within_of_open derivWithin_of_isOpen
lemma deriv_eqOn {f' : 𝕜 → F} (hs : IsOpen s) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) :
s.EqOn (deriv f) f' := fun x hx ↦ by
rw [← derivWithin_of_isOpen hs hx, (hf' _ hx).derivWithin <| hs.uniqueDiffWithinAt hx]
theorem deriv_mem_iff {f : 𝕜 → F} {s : Set F} {x : 𝕜} :
deriv f x ∈ s ↔
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ deriv f x ∈ s ∨ ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ (0 : F) ∈ s := by
by_cases hx : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x <;> simp [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt, *]
#align deriv_mem_iff deriv_mem_iff
theorem derivWithin_mem_iff {f : 𝕜 → F} {t : Set 𝕜} {s : Set F} {x : 𝕜} :
derivWithin f t x ∈ s ↔
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x ∧ derivWithin f t x ∈ s ∨
¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x ∧ (0 : F) ∈ s := by
by_cases hx : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x <;>
simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt, *]
#align deriv_within_mem_iff derivWithin_mem_iff
theorem differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (Ioi x) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (Ici x) x :=
⟨fun h => h.hasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi.differentiableWithinAt, fun h =>
h.hasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici.differentiableWithinAt⟩
#align differentiable_within_at_Ioi_iff_Ici differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
-- Golfed while splitting the file
theorem derivWithin_Ioi_eq_Ici {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] (f : ℝ → E)
(x : ℝ) : derivWithin f (Ioi x) x = derivWithin f (Ici x) x := by
by_cases H : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ioi x) x
· have A := H.hasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi
have B := (differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici.1 H).hasDerivWithinAt
simpa using (uniqueDiffOn_Ici x).eq left_mem_Ici A B
· rw [derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt H,
derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici] at H
#align deriv_within_Ioi_eq_Ici derivWithin_Ioi_eq_Ici
section congr
/-! ### Congruence properties of derivatives -/
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivAtFilter_iff (h₀ : f₀ =ᶠ[L] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x)
(h₁ : f₀' = f₁') : HasDerivAtFilter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f₁ f₁' x L :=
h₀.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff hx (by simp [h₁])
#align filter.eventually_eq.has_deriv_at_filter_iff Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivAtFilter_iff
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[L] f)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasDerivAtFilter f₁ f' x L := by rwa [hL.hasDerivAtFilter_iff hx rfl]
#align has_deriv_at_filter.congr_of_eventually_eq HasDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_mono (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (ht : ∀ x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' t x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h ht hx h₁
#align has_deriv_within_at.congr_mono HasDerivWithinAt.congr_mono
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (Subset.refl _)
#align has_deriv_within_at.congr HasDerivWithinAt.congr
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_mem (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : x ∈ s) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr hs (hs _ hx)
#align has_deriv_within_at.congr_of_mem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_mem
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
HasDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ hx
#align has_deriv_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivWithinAt_iff (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁.symm hx.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx⟩
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ (h₁.eq_of_nhdsWithin hx)
#align has_deriv_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq_of_mem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivWithinAt_iff_of_mem (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁.symm hx,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁ hx⟩
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.congr_deriv (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (h' : f' = g') :
HasStrictDerivAt f g' x :=
h.congr_fderiv <| congr_arg _ h'
theorem HasDerivAt.congr_deriv (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h' : f' = g') : HasDerivAt f g' x :=
HasFDerivAt.congr_fderiv h <| congr_arg _ h'
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_deriv (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h' : f' = g') :
HasDerivWithinAt f g' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_fderiv h <| congr_arg _ h'
theorem HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
HasDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
HasDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhds h₁ : _)
#align has_deriv_at.congr_of_eventually_eq HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) :
HasDerivAt f₀ f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq h.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq h⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic.lean | 639 | 642 | theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.derivWithin_eq (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
derivWithin f₁ s x = derivWithin f s x := by |
unfold derivWithin
rw [hs.fderivWithin_eq hx]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Lower Lebesgue integral for `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions
We define the lower Lebesgue integral of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function.
## Notation
We introduce the following notation for the lower Lebesgue integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`.
* `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with respect to a measure `μ`;
* `∫⁻ x, f x`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with respect to the canonical measure
`volume` on `α`;
* `∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` over a set `s` with respect
to a measure `μ`, defined as `∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`;
* `∫⁻ x in s, f x`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` over a set `s` with respect
to the canonical measure `volume`, defined as `∫⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`.
-/
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- The **lower Lebesgue integral** of a function `f` with respect to a measure `μ`. -/
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫⁻ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫⁻ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 158 | 158 | theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by | rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Instances
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.list.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists Set.range
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
-- Porting note: Delete this attribute
-- attribute [inline] List.head!
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
#align list.unique_of_is_empty List.uniqueOfIsEmpty
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
#align list.cons_ne_nil List.cons_ne_nil
#align list.cons_ne_self List.cons_ne_self
#align list.head_eq_of_cons_eq List.head_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
#align list.tail_eq_of_cons_eq List.tail_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
#align list.cons_injective List.cons_injective
#align list.cons_inj List.cons_inj
#align list.cons_eq_cons List.cons_eq_cons
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
#align list.singleton_injective List.singleton_injective
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align list.singleton_inj List.singleton_inj
#align list.exists_cons_of_ne_nil List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
#align list.set_of_mem_cons List.set_of_mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
#align list.mem_singleton_self List.mem_singleton_self
#align list.eq_of_mem_singleton List.eq_of_mem_singleton
#align list.mem_singleton List.mem_singleton
#align list.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem List.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
#align decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.not_mem_append List.not_mem_append
#align list.ne_nil_of_mem List.ne_nil_of_mem
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias mem_split := append_of_mem
#align list.mem_split List.append_of_mem
#align list.mem_of_ne_of_mem List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
#align list.ne_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem List.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem
#align list.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.mem_map List.mem_map
#align list.exists_of_mem_map List.exists_of_mem_map
#align list.mem_map_of_mem List.mem_map_of_memₓ -- implicits order
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
#align list.mem_map_of_injective List.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
#align function.involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
#align list.mem_map_of_involutive List.mem_map_of_involutive
#align list.forall_mem_map_iff List.forall_mem_map_iffₓ -- universe order
#align list.map_eq_nil List.map_eq_nilₓ -- universe order
attribute [simp] List.mem_join
#align list.mem_join List.mem_join
#align list.exists_of_mem_join List.exists_of_mem_join
#align list.mem_join_of_mem List.mem_join_of_memₓ -- implicits order
attribute [simp] List.mem_bind
#align list.mem_bind List.mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3, And in Lean4
#align list.exists_of_mem_bind List.exists_of_mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
#align list.mem_bind_of_mem List.mem_bind_of_memₓ -- implicits order
#align list.bind_map List.bind_mapₓ -- implicits order
theorem map_bind (g : β → List γ) (f : α → β) :
∀ l : List α, (List.map f l).bind g = l.bind fun a => g (f a)
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by simp only [cons_bind, map_cons, map_bind _ _ l]
#align list.map_bind List.map_bind
/-! ### length -/
#align list.length_eq_zero List.length_eq_zero
#align list.length_singleton List.length_singleton
#align list.length_pos_of_mem List.length_pos_of_mem
#align list.exists_mem_of_length_pos List.exists_mem_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_iff_exists_mem List.length_pos_iff_exists_mem
alias ⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos
#align list.ne_nil_of_length_pos List.ne_nil_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_of_ne_nil List.length_pos_of_ne_nil
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
#align list.length_pos_iff_ne_nil List.length_pos_iff_ne_nil
#align list.exists_mem_of_ne_nil List.exists_mem_of_ne_nil
#align list.length_eq_one List.length_eq_one
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
#align list.exists_of_length_succ List.exists_of_length_succ
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· apply ih; simpa using hl
#align list.length_injective_iff List.length_injective_iff
@[simp default+1] -- Porting note: this used to be just @[simp]
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
#align list.length_injective List.length_injective
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_two List.length_eq_two
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_three List.length_eq_three
#align list.sublist.length_le List.Sublist.length_le
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
#align list.has_singleton List.instSingletonList
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_emptyc_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg (not_mem_nil _) }
#align list.empty_eq List.empty_eq
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
#align list.singleton_eq List.singleton_eq
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
#align list.insert_neg List.insert_neg
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
#align list.insert_pos List.insert_pos
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
#align list.doubleton_eq List.doubleton_eq
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
#align list.forall_mem_nil List.forall_mem_nil
#align list.forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
#align list.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons
#align list.forall_mem_singleton List.forall_mem_singleton
#align list.forall_mem_append List.forall_mem_append
#align list.not_exists_mem_nil List.not_exists_mem_nilₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of List.exists_mem_cons_ofₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of_exists List.exists_mem_cons_of_existsₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
#align list.or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons List.or_exists_of_exists_mem_consₓ -- bExists change
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
#align list.exists_mem_cons_iff List.exists_mem_cons_iff
/-! ### list subset -/
instance : IsTrans (List α) Subset where
trans := fun _ _ _ => List.Subset.trans
#align list.subset_def List.subset_def
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_left List.subset_append_of_subset_left
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_right List.subset_append_of_subset_right
#align list.cons_subset List.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
#align list.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem List.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
#align list.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset List.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.append_subset_iff List.append_subset
alias ⟨eq_nil_of_subset_nil, _⟩ := subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_of_subset_nil List.eq_nil_of_subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem
#align list.map_subset List.map_subset
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
#align list.map_subset_iff List.map_subset_iff
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
#align list.append_eq_has_append List.append_eq_has_append
#align list.singleton_append List.singleton_append
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right
#align list.append_eq_nil List.append_eq_nil
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.nil_eq_append_iff List.nil_eq_append
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias append_eq_cons_iff := append_eq_cons
#align list.append_eq_cons_iff List.append_eq_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias cons_eq_append_iff := cons_eq_append
#align list.cons_eq_append_iff List.cons_eq_append
#align list.append_eq_append_iff List.append_eq_append_iff
#align list.take_append_drop List.take_append_drop
#align list.append_inj List.append_inj
#align list.append_inj_right List.append_inj_rightₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left List.append_inj_leftₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj' List.append_inj'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_right' List.append_inj_right'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left' List.append_inj_left'ₓ -- implicits order
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_left_cancel := append_cancel_left
#align list.append_left_cancel List.append_cancel_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_right_cancel := append_cancel_right
#align list.append_right_cancel List.append_cancel_right
@[simp] theorem append_left_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [← append_left_inj (s₁ := x), nil_append]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_left {x y : List α} : y = x ++ y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_left_eq_self]
@[simp] theorem append_right_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = x ↔ y = [] := by
rw [← append_right_inj (t₁ := y), append_nil]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_right {x y : List α} : x = x ++ y ↔ y = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_right_eq_self]
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
#align list.append_right_injective List.append_right_injective
#align list.append_right_inj List.append_right_inj
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
#align list.append_left_injective List.append_left_injective
#align list.append_left_inj List.append_left_inj
#align list.map_eq_append_split List.map_eq_append_split
/-! ### replicate -/
@[simp] lemma replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = [] := rfl
#align list.replicate_zero List.replicate_zero
attribute [simp] replicate_succ
#align list.replicate_succ List.replicate_succ
lemma replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = [a] := rfl
#align list.replicate_one List.replicate_one
#align list.length_replicate List.length_replicate
#align list.mem_replicate List.mem_replicate
#align list.eq_of_mem_replicate List.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length]
#align list.eq_replicate_length List.eq_replicate_length
#align list.eq_replicate_of_mem List.eq_replicate_of_mem
#align list.eq_replicate List.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
induction m <;> simp [*, succ_add, replicate]
#align list.replicate_add List.replicate_add
theorem replicate_succ' (n) (a : α) : replicate (n + 1) a = replicate n a ++ [a] :=
replicate_add n 1 a
#align list.replicate_succ' List.replicate_succ'
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
#align list.replicate_subset_singleton List.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
#align list.subset_singleton_iff List.subset_singleton_iff
@[simp] theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (n) (a : α) :
map f (replicate n a) = replicate n (f a) := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, map]]
#align list.map_replicate List.map_replicate
@[simp] theorem tail_replicate (a : α) (n) :
tail (replicate n a) = replicate (n - 1) a := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.tail_replicate List.tail_replicate
@[simp] theorem join_replicate_nil (n : ℕ) : join (replicate n []) = @nil α := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, join, append_nil]]
#align list.join_replicate_nil List.join_replicate_nil
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align list.replicate_right_injective List.replicate_right_injective
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_right_inj List.replicate_right_inj
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
#align list.replicate_right_inj' List.replicate_right_inj'
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate · a)
#align list.replicate_left_injective List.replicate_left_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_left_inj List.replicate_left_inj
@[simp] theorem head_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) (h) : head (replicate n a) h = a := by
cases n <;> simp at h ⊢
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
#align list.mem_pure List.mem_pure
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.bind f :=
rfl
#align list.bind_eq_bind List.bind_eq_bind
#align list.bind_append List.append_bind
/-! ### concat -/
#align list.concat_nil List.concat_nil
#align list.concat_cons List.concat_cons
#align list.concat_eq_append List.concat_eq_append
#align list.init_eq_of_concat_eq List.init_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.last_eq_of_concat_eq List.last_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.concat_ne_nil List.concat_ne_nil
#align list.concat_append List.concat_append
#align list.length_concat List.length_concat
#align list.append_concat List.append_concat
/-! ### reverse -/
#align list.reverse_nil List.reverse_nil
#align list.reverse_core List.reverseAux
-- Porting note: Do we need this?
attribute [local simp] reverseAux
#align list.reverse_cons List.reverse_cons
#align list.reverse_core_eq List.reverseAux_eq
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
#align list.reverse_cons' List.reverse_cons'
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
#align list.reverse_singleton List.reverse_singleton
#align list.reverse_append List.reverse_append
#align list.reverse_concat List.reverse_concat
#align list.reverse_reverse List.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
#align list.reverse_involutive List.reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
#align list.reverse_injective List.reverse_injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
#align list.reverse_surjective List.reverse_surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
#align list.reverse_bijective List.reverse_bijective
@[simp]
theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : List α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_inj List.reverse_inj
theorem reverse_eq_iff {l l' : List α} : l.reverse = l' ↔ l = l'.reverse :=
reverse_involutive.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_iff List.reverse_eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_nil List.reverse_eq_nil_iff
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
#align list.concat_eq_reverse_cons List.concat_eq_reverse_cons
#align list.length_reverse List.length_reverse
-- Porting note: This one was @[simp] in mathlib 3,
-- but Lean contains a competing simp lemma reverse_map.
-- For now we remove @[simp] to avoid simplification loops.
-- TODO: Change Lean lemma to match mathlib 3?
theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
(reverse_map f l).symm
#align list.map_reverse List.map_reverse
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
#align list.map_reverse_core List.map_reverseAux
#align list.mem_reverse List.mem_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_replicate (n) (a : α) : reverse (replicate n a) = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate.2
⟨by rw [length_reverse, length_replicate],
fun b h => eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
#align list.reverse_replicate List.reverse_replicate
/-! ### empty -/
-- Porting note: this does not work as desired
-- attribute [simp] List.isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_iff_eq_nil {l : List α} : l.isEmpty ↔ l = [] := by cases l <;> simp [isEmpty]
#align list.empty_iff_eq_nil List.isEmpty_iff_eq_nil
/-! ### dropLast -/
#align list.length_init List.length_dropLast
/-! ### getLast -/
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons {a : α} {l : List α} :
∀ h : l ≠ nil, getLast (a :: l) (cons_ne_nil a l) = getLast l h := by
induction l <;> intros
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.last_cons List.getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l _ (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp only [getLast_append]
#align list.last_append_singleton List.getLast_append_singleton
-- Porting note: name should be fixed upstream
theorem getLast_append' (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l₁ l₂ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction' l₁ with _ _ ih
· simp
· simp only [cons_append]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
exact ih
#align list.last_append List.getLast_append'
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (concat_ne_nil a l) = a :=
getLast_concat ..
#align list.last_concat List.getLast_concat'
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
#align list.last_singleton List.getLast_singleton'
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
#align list.last_cons_cons List.getLast_cons_cons
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [a], h => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
#align list.init_append_last List.dropLast_append_getLast
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
#align list.last_congr List.getLast_congr
#align list.last_mem List.getLast_mem
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ (length_replicate _ _)) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
#align list.last_replicate_succ List.getLast_replicate_succ
/-! ### getLast? -/
-- Porting note: Moved earlier in file, for use in subsequent lemmas.
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_cons_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) :
getLast? (a :: b :: l) = getLast? (b :: l) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isNone : ∀ {l : List α}, (getLast? l).isNone ↔ l = []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isNone (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_none List.getLast?_isNone
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isSome : ∀ {l : List α}, l.getLast?.isSome ↔ l ≠ []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isSome (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_some List.getLast?_isSome
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
#align list.mem_last'_eq_last List.mem_getLast?_eq_getLast
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
#align list.last'_eq_last_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
#align list.mem_last'_cons List.mem_getLast?_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_getLast? {l : List α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.getLast?) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := mem_getLast?_eq_getLast ha
h₂.symm ▸ getLast_mem _
#align list.mem_of_mem_last' List.mem_of_mem_getLast?
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
#align list.init_append_last' List.dropLast_append_getLast?
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [a] => rfl
| [a, b] => rfl
| [a, b, c] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
#align list.ilast_eq_last' List.getLastI_eq_getLast?
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], a, l₂ => rfl
| [b], a, l₂ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
#align list.last'_append_cons List.getLast?_append_cons
#align list.last'_cons_cons List.getLast?_cons_cons
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
#align list.last'_append_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem getLast?_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
#align list.last'_append List.getLast?_append
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head_eq_head' List.head!_eq_head?
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_head List.surjective_head!
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
#align list.surjective_head' List.surjective_head?
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_tail List.surjective_tail
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
#align list.eq_cons_of_mem_head' List.eq_cons_of_mem_head?
theorem mem_of_mem_head? {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l.head?) : x ∈ l :=
(eq_cons_of_mem_head? h).symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
#align list.mem_of_mem_head' List.mem_of_mem_head?
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
#align list.head_cons List.head!_cons
#align list.tail_nil List.tail_nil
#align list.tail_cons List.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.head_append List.head!_append
theorem head?_append {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) : x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
#align list.head'_append List.head?_append
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
#align list.head'_append_of_ne_nil List.head?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
#align list.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
#align list.cons_head'_tail List.cons_head?_tail
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| a :: l, _ => rfl
#align list.head_mem_head' List.head!_mem_head?
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
#align list.cons_head_tail List.cons_head!_tail
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' := mem_cons_self l.head! l.tail
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
#align list.head_mem_self List.head!_mem_self
theorem head_mem {l : List α} : ∀ (h : l ≠ nil), l.head h ∈ l := by
cases l <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head?_map (f : α → β) (l) : head? (map f l) = (head? l).map f := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head'_map List.head?_map
theorem tail_append_of_ne_nil (l l' : List α) (h : l ≠ []) : (l ++ l').tail = l.tail ++ l' := by
cases l
· contradiction
· simp
#align list.tail_append_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_of_ne_nil
#align list.nth_le_eq_iff List.get_eq_iff
theorem get_eq_get? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = (l.get? i).get (by simp [get?_eq_get]) := by
simp [get_eq_iff]
#align list.some_nth_le_eq List.get?_eq_get
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false -- TODO(Mario): make replacements for theorems in this section
/-- nth element of a list `l` given `n < l.length`. -/
@[deprecated get (since := "2023-01-05")]
def nthLe (l : List α) (n) (h : n < l.length) : α := get l ⟨n, h⟩
#align list.nth_le List.nthLe
@[simp] theorem nthLe_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.nthLe i h = l.nthLe (i + 1) h' := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
#align list.nth_le_tail List.nthLe_tail
theorem nthLe_cons_aux {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : n < (a :: l).length) :
n - 1 < l.length := by
contrapose! h
rw [length_cons]
omega
#align list.nth_le_cons_aux List.nthLe_cons_aux
theorem nthLe_cons {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hl) :
(a :: l).nthLe n hl = if hn : n = 0 then a else l.nthLe (n - 1) (nthLe_cons_aux hn hl) := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [nthLe, h]
cases l
· rw [length_singleton, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hl
omega
cases n
· contradiction
rfl
#align list.nth_le_cons List.nthLe_cons
end deprecated
-- Porting note: List.modifyHead has @[simp], and Lean 4 treats this as
-- an invitation to unfold modifyHead in any context,
-- not just use the equational lemmas.
-- @[simp]
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem modifyHead_modifyHead (l : List α) (f g : α → α) :
(l.modifyHead f).modifyHead g = l.modifyHead (g ∘ f) := by cases l <;> simp
#align list.modify_head_modify_head List.modifyHead_modifyHead
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def reverseRecOn {motive : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) : motive l :=
match h : reverse l with
| [] => cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
nil
| head :: tail =>
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
append_singleton _ head <| reverseRecOn (reverse tail) nil append_singleton
termination_by l.length
decreasing_by
simp_wf
rw [← length_reverse l, h, length_cons]
simp [Nat.lt_succ]
#align list.reverse_rec_on List.reverseRecOn
@[simp]
theorem reverseRecOn_nil {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn [] nil append_singleton = nil := reverseRecOn.eq_1 ..
-- `unusedHavesSuffices` is getting confused by the unfolding of `reverseRecOn`
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem reverseRecOn_concat {motive : List α → Sort*} (x : α) (xs : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
append_singleton _ _ (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) xs nil append_singleton) := by
suffices ∀ ys (h : reverse (reverse xs) = ys),
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
cast (by simp [(reverse_reverse _).symm.trans h])
(append_singleton _ x (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) ys nil append_singleton)) by
exact this _ (reverse_reverse xs)
intros ys hy
conv_lhs => unfold reverseRecOn
split
next h => simp at h
next heq =>
revert heq
simp only [reverse_append, reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, singleton_append, cons.injEq]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
subst ys
rfl
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def bidirectionalRec {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
∀ l, motive l
| [] => nil
| [a] => singleton a
| a :: b :: l =>
let l' := dropLast (b :: l)
let b' := getLast (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
cast (by rw [← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)]) <|
cons_append a l' b' (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l')
termination_by l => l.length
#align list.bidirectional_rec List.bidirectionalRecₓ -- universe order
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_nil {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [] = nil := bidirectionalRec.eq_1 ..
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_singleton {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) (a : α):
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [a] = singleton a := by
simp [bidirectionalRec]
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_cons_append {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b])))
(a : α) (l : List α) (b : α) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append (a :: (l ++ [b])) =
cons_append a l b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bidirectionalRec
cases l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs =>
simp only [List.cons_append]
dsimp only [← List.cons_append]
suffices ∀ (ys init : List α) (hinit : init = ys) (last : α) (hlast : last = b),
(cons_append a init last
(bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append init)) =
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simp [hinit, hlast])
(cons_append a ys b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append ys)) by
rw [this (x :: xs) _ (by rw [dropLast_append_cons, dropLast_single, append_nil]) _ (by simp)]
simp
rintro ys init rfl last rfl
rfl
/-- Like `bidirectionalRec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
abbrev bidirectionalRecOn {C : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ a : α, C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectionalRec H0 H1 Hn l
#align list.bidirectional_rec_on List.bidirectionalRecOn
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
#align list.nil_sublist List.nil_sublist
#align list.sublist.refl List.Sublist.refl
#align list.sublist.trans List.Sublist.trans
#align list.sublist_cons List.sublist_cons
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist List.sublist_of_cons_sublist
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
#align list.sublist.cons_cons List.Sublist.cons_cons
#align list.sublist_append_left List.sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist_append_right List.sublist_append_right
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
#align list.sublist_cons_of_sublist List.sublist_cons_of_sublist
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_left List.sublist_append_of_sublist_left
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_right List.sublist_append_of_sublist_right
theorem tail_sublist : ∀ l : List α, tail l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a::l => sublist_cons a l
#align list.tail_sublist List.tail_sublist
@[gcongr] protected theorem Sublist.tail : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → tail l₁ <+ tail l₂
| _, _, slnil => .slnil
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ h => (tail_sublist _).trans h
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ _ h => h
theorem Sublist.of_cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} {a b : α} (h : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.tail
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons List.Sublist.of_cons_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")]
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {a} (h : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ := h.of_cons_cons
attribute [simp] cons_sublist_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")] alias cons_sublist_cons_iff := cons_sublist_cons
#align list.cons_sublist_cons_iff List.cons_sublist_cons_iff
#align list.append_sublist_append_left List.append_sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist.append_right List.Sublist.append_right
#align list.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist List.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist
#align list.sublist.reverse List.Sublist.reverse
#align list.reverse_sublist_iff List.reverse_sublist
#align list.append_sublist_append_right List.append_sublist_append_right
#align list.sublist.append List.Sublist.append
#align list.sublist.subset List.Sublist.subset
#align list.singleton_sublist List.singleton_sublist
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : List α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil <| s.subset
#align list.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil List.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil
-- Porting note: this lemma seems to have been renamed on the occasion of its move to Batteries
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
#align list.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil List.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
#align list.replicate_sublist_replicate List.replicate_sublist_replicate
theorem sublist_replicate_iff {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ} :
l <+ replicate n a ↔ ∃ k ≤ n, l = replicate k a :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨l.length, h.length_le.trans_eq (length_replicate _ _),
eq_replicate_length.mpr fun b hb => eq_of_mem_replicate (h.subset hb)⟩,
by rintro ⟨k, h, rfl⟩; exact (replicate_sublist_replicate _).mpr h⟩
#align list.sublist_replicate_iff List.sublist_replicate_iff
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length List.Sublist.eq_of_length
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length_le List.Sublist.eq_of_length_le
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
#align list.sublist.antisymm List.Sublist.antisymm
instance decidableSublist [DecidableEq α] : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [], _ => isTrue <| nil_sublist _
| _ :: _, [] => isFalse fun h => List.noConfusion <| eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ =>
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist l₁ l₂) <| h ▸ cons_sublist_cons.symm
else
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist (a :: l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, fun s =>
match a, l₁, s, h with
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ s', h => s'
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ t _, h => absurd rfl h⟩
#align list.decidable_sublist List.decidableSublist
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
#align list.index_of_nil List.indexOf_nil
/-
Porting note: The following proofs were simpler prior to the port. These proofs use the low-level
`findIdx.go`.
* `indexOf_cons_self`
* `indexOf_cons_eq`
* `indexOf_cons_ne`
* `indexOf_cons`
The ported versions of the earlier proofs are given in comments.
-/
-- indexOf_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_self (a : α) (l : List α) : indexOf a (a :: l) = 0 := by
rw [indexOf, findIdx_cons, beq_self_eq_true, cond]
#align list.index_of_cons_self List.indexOf_cons_self
-- fun e => if_pos e
theorem indexOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → indexOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact indexOf_cons_self b l
#align list.index_of_cons_eq List.indexOf_cons_eq
-- fun n => if_neg n
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → indexOf a (b :: l) = succ (indexOf a l)
| h => by simp only [indexOf, findIdx_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, h, ite_false]
#align list.index_of_cons_ne List.indexOf_cons_ne
#align list.index_of_cons List.indexOf_cons
theorem indexOf_eq_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction' l with b l ih
· exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _)
simp only [length, mem_cons, indexOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or_iff]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj'
#align list.index_of_eq_length List.indexOf_eq_length
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → indexOf a l = length l :=
indexOf_eq_length.2
#align list.index_of_of_not_mem List.indexOf_of_not_mem
theorem indexOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction' l with b l ih; · rfl
simp only [length, indexOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
#align list.index_of_le_length List.indexOf_le_length
theorem indexOf_lt_length {a} {l : List α} : indexOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.by_contradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| indexOf_eq_length.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne indexOf_le_length) fun h => indexOf_eq_length.1 h al⟩
#align list.index_of_lt_length List.indexOf_lt_length
theorem indexOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = indexOf a l₁ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· exfalso
exact not_mem_nil a h
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [indexOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
#align list.index_of_append_of_mem List.indexOf_append_of_mem
theorem indexOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + indexOf a l₂ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
rw [List.cons_append, indexOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
#align list.index_of_append_of_not_mem List.indexOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated get_of_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := get_of_mem h; ⟨i.1, i.2, h⟩
#align list.nth_le_of_mem List.nthLe_of_mem
@[deprecated get?_eq_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_get? {l : List α} {n} (h) : get? l n = some (nthLe l n h) := get?_eq_get _
#align list.nth_le_nth List.nthLe_get?
#align list.nth_len_le List.get?_len_le
@[simp]
theorem get?_length (l : List α) : l.get? l.length = none := get?_len_le le_rfl
#align list.nth_length List.get?_length
#align list.nth_eq_some List.get?_eq_some
#align list.nth_eq_none_iff List.get?_eq_none
#align list.nth_of_mem List.get?_of_mem
@[deprecated get_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_mem (l : List α) (n h) : nthLe l n h ∈ l := get_mem ..
#align list.nth_le_mem List.nthLe_mem
#align list.nth_mem List.get?_mem
@[deprecated mem_iff_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem mem_iff_nthLe {a} {l : List α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
mem_iff_get.trans ⟨fun ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩ => ⟨n, h, e⟩, fun ⟨n, h, e⟩ => ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩⟩
#align list.mem_iff_nth_le List.mem_iff_nthLe
#align list.mem_iff_nth List.mem_iff_get?
#align list.nth_zero List.get?_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-03")] alias get?_injective := get?_inj
#align list.nth_injective List.get?_inj
#align list.nth_map List.get?_map
@[deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nthLe (map f l) n H1 = f (nthLe l n H2) := get_map ..
#align list.nth_le_map List.nthLe_map
/-- A version of `get_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem get_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} :
f (get l n) = get (map f l) ⟨n.1, (l.length_map f).symm ▸ n.2⟩ := Eq.symm (get_map _)
/-- A version of `nthLe_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
@[deprecated get_map_rev (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nthLe l n H) = nthLe (map f l) n ((l.length_map f).symm ▸ H) :=
(nthLe_map f _ _).symm
#align list.nth_le_map_rev List.nthLe_map_rev
@[simp, deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nthLe (map f l) n H = f (nthLe l n (l.length_map f ▸ H)) := nthLe_map f _ _
#align list.nth_le_map' List.nthLe_map'
#align list.nth_le_of_eq List.get_of_eq
@[simp, deprecated get_singleton (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) : nthLe [a] n hn = a := get_singleton ..
#align list.nth_le_singleton List.get_singleton
#align list.nth_le_zero List.get_mk_zero
#align list.nth_le_append List.get_append
@[deprecated get_append_right' (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_append_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nthLe n h₂ = l₂.nthLe (n - l₁.length) (get_append_right_aux h₁ h₂) :=
get_append_right' h₁ h₂
#align list.nth_le_append_right_aux List.get_append_right_aux
#align list.nth_le_append_right List.nthLe_append_right
#align list.nth_le_replicate List.get_replicate
#align list.nth_append List.get?_append
#align list.nth_append_right List.get?_append_right
#align list.last_eq_nth_le List.getLast_eq_get
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_get l _).symm
#align list.nth_le_length_sub_one List.get_length_sub_one
#align list.nth_concat_length List.get?_concat_length
@[deprecated get_cons_length (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_cons_length : ∀ (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : ℕ) (h : n = xs.length),
(x :: xs).nthLe n (by simp [h]) = (x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs) := get_cons_length
#align list.nth_le_cons_length List.nthLe_cons_length
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_get_cons h, take, take]
#align list.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length List.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length
#align list.ext List.ext
-- TODO one may rename ext in the standard library, and it is also not clear
-- which of ext_get?, ext_get?', ext_get should be @[ext], if any
alias ext_get? := ext
theorem ext_get?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, get?_eq_none.mpr]
theorem ext_get?_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔ ∀ n, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _; rfl, ext_get?⟩
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_get?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_get?'⟩
@[deprecated ext_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem ext_nthLe {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀ n h₁ h₂, nthLe l₁ n h₁ = nthLe l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_get hl h
#align list.ext_le List.ext_nthLe
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h), get l ⟨indexOf a l, h⟩ = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, indexOf_cons, get, @indexOf_get _ _ l, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
#align list.index_of_nth_le List.indexOf_get
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get? [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
get? l (indexOf a l) = some a := by rw [get?_eq_get, indexOf_get (indexOf_lt_length.2 h)]
#align list.index_of_nth List.indexOf_get?
@[deprecated (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem get_reverse_aux₁ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i h1 h2), get (reverseAux l r) ⟨i + length l, h1⟩ = get r ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i => fun h1 _ => rfl
| a :: l, r, i => by
rw [show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l from Nat.add_right_comm i (length l) 1]
exact fun h1 h2 => get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) (i + 1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux1 List.get_reverse_aux₁
theorem indexOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
indexOf x l = indexOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨indexOf x l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨indexOf y l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [indexOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
#align list.index_of_inj List.indexOf_inj
theorem get_reverse_aux₂ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i : Nat) (h1) (h2),
get (reverseAux l r) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i, h1, h2 => absurd h2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| a :: l, r, 0, h1, _ => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) 0
rw [Nat.zero_add] at aux
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
| a :: l, r, i + 1, h1, h2 => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₂ l (a :: r) i
have heq : length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1) = length l - 1 - i := by rw [length]; omega
rw [← heq] at aux
apply aux
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux2 List.get_reverse_aux₂
@[simp] theorem get_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
get (reverse l) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩ :=
get_reverse_aux₂ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp, deprecated get_reverse (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
nthLe (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nthLe l i h2 :=
get_reverse ..
#align list.nth_le_reverse List.nthLe_reverse
theorem nthLe_reverse' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.reverse.length) (hn') :
l.reverse.nthLe n hn = l.nthLe (l.length - 1 - n) hn' := by
rw [eq_comm]
convert nthLe_reverse l.reverse n (by simpa) hn using 1
simp
#align list.nth_le_reverse' List.nthLe_reverse'
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := nthLe_reverse' ..
-- FIXME: prove it the other way around
attribute [deprecated get_reverse' (since := "2023-01-05")] nthLe_reverse'
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nthLe 0 (by omega)] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp only [get_singleton]
congr
omega
#align list.eq_cons_of_length_one List.eq_cons_of_length_one
end deprecated
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail {f g : List α → List α} (m : ℕ) :
∀ (n) (l : List α),
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g (m + n) =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g m) n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, a :: l => congr_arg (List.cons a) (modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail m n l)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le {f g : List α → List α} (m n : ℕ) (l : List α)
(h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g m =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g (m - n)) n := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.add_comm, modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same {f g : List α → List α} (n : ℕ) (l : List α) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g n = l.modifyNthTail (g ∘ f) n := by
rw [modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le n n l (le_refl n), Nat.sub_self]; rfl
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same
#align list.modify_nth_tail_id List.modifyNthTail_id
#align list.remove_nth_eq_nth_tail List.eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
#align list.update_nth_eq_modify_nth List.set_eq_modifyNth
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias removeNth_eq_nthTail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNth_eq_set (f : α → α) :
∀ (n) (l : List α), modifyNth f n l = ((fun a => set l n (f a)) <$> get? l n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, b :: l =>
(congr_arg (cons b) (modifyNth_eq_set f n l)).trans <| by cases h : get? l n <;> simp [h]
#align list.modify_nth_eq_update_nth List.modifyNth_eq_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth List.get?_modifyNth
theorem length_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _ => @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (· + 1) (length_modifyNthTail _ H _ _)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_length List.length_modifyNthTail
-- Porting note: Duplicate of `modify_get?_length`
-- (but with a substantially better name?)
-- @[simp]
theorem length_modifyNth (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modify_get?_length f
#align list.modify_nth_length List.length_modifyNth
#align list.update_nth_length List.length_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth_eq List.get?_modifyNth_eq
#align list.nth_modify_nth_ne List.get?_modifyNth_ne
#align list.nth_update_nth_eq List.get?_set_eq
#align list.nth_update_nth_of_lt List.get?_set_eq_of_lt
#align list.nth_update_nth_ne List.get?_set_ne
#align list.update_nth_nil List.set_nil
#align list.update_nth_succ List.set_succ
#align list.update_nth_comm List.set_comm
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_eq List.get_set_eq
@[simp]
theorem get_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a).get ⟨j, hj⟩ = l.get ⟨j, by simpa using hj⟩ := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.get?_eq_get, List.get?_set_ne _ _ h, List.get?_eq_get]
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_of_ne List.get_set_of_ne
#align list.mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth List.mem_or_eq_of_mem_set
/-! ### map -/
#align list.map_nil List.map_nil
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = foldr (fun a bs => f a :: bs) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.map_eq_foldr List.map_eq_foldr
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : List α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: l, h => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h
rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
#align list.map_congr List.map_congr
theorem map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : List α} : map f l = map g l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x := by
refine ⟨?_, map_congr⟩; intro h x hx
rw [mem_iff_get] at hx; rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
rw [get_map_rev f, get_map_rev g]
congr!
#align list.map_eq_map_iff List.map_eq_map_iff
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_concat List.map_concat
#align list.map_id'' List.map_id'
theorem map_id'' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : List α) : map f l = l := by
simp [show f = id from funext h]
#align list.map_id' List.map_id''
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : List α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero <| by rw [← length_map l f, h]; rfl
#align list.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil List.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : List (List α)) : map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) := by
induction L <;> [rfl; simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_join List.map_join
theorem bind_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_bind ..
#align list.bind_ret_eq_map List.bind_pure_eq_map
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated bind_pure_eq_map (since := "2024-03-24")]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (List.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
bind_pure_eq_map f l
theorem bind_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
List.bind l f = List.bind l g :=
(congr_arg List.join <| map_congr h : _)
#align list.bind_congr List.bind_congr
theorem infix_bind_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.bind f :=
List.infix_of_mem_join (List.mem_map_of_mem f h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
#align list.map_eq_map List.map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.map_tail List.map_tail
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
(map_map _ _ _).symm
#align list.comp_map List.comp_map
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
#align list.map_comp_map List.map_comp_map
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
#align list.map_injective_iff List.map_injective_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (fun a bs => bif p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as := by
induction' as with head tail
· rfl
· simp only [foldr]
cases hp : p head <;> simp [filter, *]
#align list.map_filter_eq_foldr List.map_filter_eq_foldr
theorem getLast_map (f : α → β) {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).getLast (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.getLast hl) := by
induction' l with l_hd l_tl l_ih
· apply (hl rfl).elim
· cases l_tl
· simp
· simpa using l_ih _
#align list.last_map List.getLast_map
theorem map_eq_replicate_iff {l : List α} {f : α → β} {b : β} :
l.map f = replicate l.length b ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = b := by
simp [eq_replicate]
#align list.map_eq_replicate_iff List.map_eq_replicate_iff
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : List α) (b : β) : map (const α b) l = replicate l.length b :=
map_eq_replicate_iff.mpr fun _ _ => rfl
#align list.map_const List.map_const
@[simp] theorem map_const' (l : List α) (b : β) : map (fun _ => b) l = replicate l.length b :=
map_const l b
#align list.map_const' List.map_const'
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
#align list.eq_of_mem_map_const List.eq_of_mem_map_const
/-! ### zipWith -/
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 1,687 | 1,687 | theorem nil_zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (l : List β) : zipWith f [] l = [] := by | cases l <;> rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
#align_import analysis.seminorm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"09079525fd01b3dda35e96adaa08d2f943e1648c"
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F G ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
#align seminorm Seminorm
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ : Prop where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
#align seminorm_class SeminormClass
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
-- Porting note: dangerous instances no longer exist
-- attribute [nolint dangerousInstance] SeminormClass.toAddGroupSeminormClass
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
#align seminorm.of Seminorm.of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
#align seminorm.of_smul_le Seminorm.ofSMulLE
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
#align seminorm.seminorm_class Seminorm.instSeminormClass
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
#align seminorm.ext Seminorm.ext
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
#align seminorm.coe_zero Seminorm.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
#align seminorm.zero_apply Seminorm.zero_apply
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (c : 𝕜) (x y : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
#align seminorm.coe_smul Seminorm.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
#align seminorm.smul_apply Seminorm.smul_apply
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
#align seminorm.coe_add Seminorm.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
#align seminorm.add_apply Seminorm.add_apply
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align seminorm.coe_fn_add_monoid_hom Seminorm.coeFnAddMonoidHom
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
#align seminorm.coe_fn_add_monoid_hom_injective Seminorm.coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Sup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sup p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
#align seminorm.coe_sup Seminorm.coe_sup
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
#align seminorm.sup_apply Seminorm.sup_apply
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun x => real.smul_max _ _
#align seminorm.smul_sup Seminorm.smul_sup
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align seminorm.coe_le_coe Seminorm.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
#align seminorm.coe_lt_coe Seminorm.coe_lt_coe
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
#align seminorm.le_def Seminorm.le_def
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
#align seminorm.lt_def Seminorm.lt_def
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [AddCommGroup F] [AddCommGroup G]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃] [Module 𝕜 F] [Module 𝕜 G]
-- Porting note: even though this instance is found immediately by typeclass search,
-- it seems to be needed below!?
noncomputable instance smul_nnreal_real : SMul ℝ≥0 ℝ := inferInstance
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: #8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
#align seminorm.comp Seminorm.comp
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
#align seminorm.coe_comp Seminorm.coe_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
#align seminorm.comp_apply Seminorm.comp_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align seminorm.comp_id Seminorm.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
#align seminorm.comp_zero Seminorm.comp_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align seminorm.zero_comp Seminorm.zero_comp
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align seminorm.comp_comp Seminorm.comp_comp
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align seminorm.add_comp Seminorm.add_comp
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
#align seminorm.comp_add_le Seminorm.comp_add_le
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align seminorm.smul_comp Seminorm.smul_comp
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
#align seminorm.comp_mono Seminorm.comp_mono
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
#align seminorm.pullback Seminorm.pullback
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
#align seminorm.coe_bot Seminorm.coe_bot
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
#align seminorm.bot_eq_zero Seminorm.bot_eq_zero
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
#align seminorm.smul_le_smul Seminorm.smul_le_smul
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, sup_eq_max, Pi.sup_apply, sup_eq_max,
NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
#align seminorm.finset_sup_apply Seminorm.finset_sup_apply
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
#align seminorm.finset_sup_le_sum Seminorm.finset_sup_le_sum
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
#align seminorm.finset_sup_apply_le Seminorm.finset_sup_apply_le
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
#align seminorm.finset_sup_apply_lt Seminorm.finset_sup_apply_lt
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
#align seminorm.norm_sub_map_le_sub Seminorm.norm_sub_map_le_sub
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
#align seminorm.comp_smul Seminorm.comp_smul
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
#align seminorm.comp_smul_apply Seminorm.comp_smul_apply
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
#align seminorm.bdd_below_range_add Seminorm.bddBelow_range_add
noncomputable instance instInf : Inf (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
inf p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
-- Porting note: the following was previously `fun i => by positivity`
(fun i => add_nonneg (apply_nonneg _ _) (apply_nonneg _ _))
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
#align seminorm.inf_apply Seminorm.inf_apply
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a b c hab hac x =>
le_ciInf fun u => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 514 | 518 | theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by |
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Emilie Burgun. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Emilie Burgun
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
/-!
# Period of a group action
This module defines some helpful lemmas around [`MulAction.period`] and [`AddAction.period`].
The period of a point `a` by a group element `g` is the smallest `m` such that `g ^ m • a = a`
(resp. `(m • g) +ᵥ a = a`) for a given `g : G` and `a : α`.
If such an `m` does not exist,
then by convention `MulAction.period` and `AddAction.period` return 0.
-/
namespace MulAction
universe u v
variable {α : Type v}
variable {G : Type u} [Group G] [MulAction G α]
variable {M : Type u} [Monoid M] [MulAction M α]
/-- If the action is periodic, then a lower bound for its period can be computed. -/
@[to_additive "If the action is periodic, then a lower bound for its period can be computed."]
theorem le_period {m : M} {a : α} {n : ℕ} (period_pos : 0 < period m a)
(moved : ∀ k, 0 < k → k < n → m ^ k • a ≠ a) : n ≤ period m a :=
le_of_not_gt fun period_lt_n =>
moved _ period_pos period_lt_n <| pow_period_smul m a
/-- If for some `n`, `m ^ n • a = a`, then `period m a ≤ n`. -/
@[to_additive "If for some `n`, `(n • m) +ᵥ a = a`, then `period m a ≤ n`."]
theorem period_le_of_fixed {m : M} {a : α} {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) (fixed : m ^ n • a = a) :
period m a ≤ n :=
(isPeriodicPt_smul_iff.mpr fixed).minimalPeriod_le n_pos
/-- If for some `n`, `m ^ n • a = a`, then `0 < period m a`. -/
@[to_additive "If for some `n`, `(n • m) +ᵥ a = a`, then `0 < period m a`."]
theorem period_pos_of_fixed {m : M} {a : α} {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) (fixed : m ^ n • a = a) :
0 < period m a :=
(isPeriodicPt_smul_iff.mpr fixed).minimalPeriod_pos n_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem period_eq_one_iff {m : M} {a : α} : period m a = 1 ↔ m • a = a :=
⟨fun eq_one => pow_one m ▸ eq_one ▸ pow_period_smul m a,
fun fixed => le_antisymm
(period_le_of_fixed one_pos (by simpa))
(period_pos_of_fixed one_pos (by simpa))⟩
/-- For any non-zero `n` less than the period of `m` on `a`, `a` is moved by `m ^ n`. -/
@[to_additive "For any non-zero `n` less than the period of `m` on `a`, `a` is moved by `n • m`."]
theorem pow_smul_ne_of_lt_period {m : M} {a : α} {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n)
(n_lt_period : n < period m a) : m ^ n • a ≠ a := fun a_fixed =>
not_le_of_gt n_lt_period <| period_le_of_fixed n_pos a_fixed
section Identities
/-! ### `MulAction.period` for common group elements
-/
variable (M) in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem period_one (a : α) : period (1 : M) a = 1 := period_eq_one_iff.mpr (one_smul M a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem period_inv (g : G) (a : α) : period g⁻¹ a = period g a := by
simp only [period_eq_minimalPeriod, Function.minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff,
isPeriodicPt_smul_iff]
intro n
rw [smul_eq_iff_eq_inv_smul, eq_comm, ← zpow_natCast, inv_zpow, inv_inv, zpow_natCast]
end Identities
section MonoidExponent
/-! ### `MulAction.period` and group exponents
The period of a given element `m : M` can be bounded by the `Monoid.exponent M` or `orderOf m`.
-/
@[to_additive]
theorem period_dvd_orderOf (m : M) (a : α) : period m a ∣ orderOf m := by
rw [← pow_smul_eq_iff_period_dvd, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_smul]
@[to_additive]
theorem period_pos_of_orderOf_pos {m : M} (order_pos : 0 < orderOf m) (a : α) :
0 < period m a :=
Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos (period_dvd_orderOf m a) order_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem period_le_orderOf {m : M} (order_pos : 0 < orderOf m) (a : α) :
period m a ≤ orderOf m :=
Nat.le_of_dvd order_pos (period_dvd_orderOf m a)
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Period.lean | 101 | 102 | theorem period_dvd_exponent (m : M) (a : α) : period m a ∣ Monoid.exponent M := by |
rw [← pow_smul_eq_iff_period_dvd, Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one, one_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Taylor
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdicCompletion.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.henselian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d1accf4f9cddb3666c6e8e4da0ac2d19c4ed73f0"
/-!
# Henselian rings
In this file we set up the basic theory of Henselian (local) rings.
A ring `R` is *Henselian* at an ideal `I` if the following conditions hold:
* `I` is contained in the Jacobson radical of `R`
* for every polynomial `f` over `R`, with a *simple* root `a₀` over the quotient ring `R/I`,
there exists a lift `a : R` of `a₀` that is a root of `f`.
(Here, saying that a root `b` of a polynomial `g` is *simple* means that `g.derivative.eval b` is a
unit. Warning: if `R/I` is not a field then it is not enough to assume that `g` has a factorization
into monic linear factors in which `X - b` shows up only once; for example `1` is not a simple root
of `X^2-1` over `ℤ/4ℤ`.)
A local ring `R` is *Henselian* if it is Henselian at its maximal ideal.
In this case the first condition is automatic, and in the second condition we may ask for
`f.derivative.eval a ≠ 0`, since the quotient ring `R/I` is a field in this case.
## Main declarations
* `HenselianRing`: a typeclass on commutative rings,
asserting that the ring is Henselian at the ideal `I`.
* `HenselianLocalRing`: a typeclass on commutative rings,
asserting that the ring is local Henselian.
* `Field.henselian`: fields are Henselian local rings
* `Henselian.TFAE`: equivalent ways of expressing the Henselian property for local rings
* `IsAdicComplete.henselianRing`:
a ring `R` with ideal `I` that is `I`-adically complete is Henselian at `I`
## References
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04GE
## Todo
After a good API for etale ring homomorphisms has been developed,
we can give more equivalent characterization of Henselian rings.
In particular, this can give a proof that factorizations into coprime polynomials can be lifted
from the residue field to the Henselian ring.
The following gist contains some code sketches in that direction.
https://gist.github.com/jcommelin/47d94e4af092641017a97f7f02bf9598
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v
open Polynomial LocalRing Polynomial Function List
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Henselian.lean | 65 | 82 | theorem isLocalRingHom_of_le_jacobson_bot {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (I : Ideal R)
(h : I ≤ Ideal.jacobson ⊥) : IsLocalRingHom (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) := by |
constructor
intro a h
have : IsUnit (Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.jacobson ⊥) a) := by
rw [isUnit_iff_exists_inv] at *
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective b
use Ideal.Quotient.mk _ b
rw [← (Ideal.Quotient.mk _).map_one, ← (Ideal.Quotient.mk _).map_mul, Ideal.Quotient.eq] at hb ⊢
exact h hb
obtain ⟨⟨x, y, h1, h2⟩, rfl : x = _⟩ := this
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective y
rw [← (Ideal.Quotient.mk _).map_mul, ← (Ideal.Quotient.mk _).map_one, Ideal.Quotient.eq,
Ideal.mem_jacobson_bot] at h1 h2
specialize h1 1
simp? at h1 says simp only [mul_one, sub_add_cancel, IsUnit.mul_iff] at h1
exact h1.1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.InverseFunctionTheorem.FDeriv
/-!
# Inverse function theorem, smooth case
In this file we specialize the inverse function theorem to `C^r`-smooth functions.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace ContDiffAt
variable {𝕂 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕂]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕂 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕂 F]
variable [CompleteSpace E] (f : E → F) {f' : E ≃L[𝕂] F} {a : E}
/-- Given a `ContDiff` function over `𝕂` (which is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) with an invertible
derivative at `a`, returns a `PartialHomeomorph` with `to_fun = f` and `a ∈ source`. -/
def toPartialHomeomorph {n : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕂] F) a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : PartialHomeomorph E F :=
(hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' hf' hn).toPartialHomeomorph f
#align cont_diff_at.to_local_homeomorph ContDiffAt.toPartialHomeomorph
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem toPartialHomeomorph_coe {n : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f a)
(hf' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕂] F) a) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
(hf.toPartialHomeomorph f hf' hn : E → F) = f :=
rfl
#align cont_diff_at.to_local_homeomorph_coe ContDiffAt.toPartialHomeomorph_coe
theorem mem_toPartialHomeomorph_source {n : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f a)
(hf' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕂] F) a) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
a ∈ (hf.toPartialHomeomorph f hf' hn).source :=
(hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' hf' hn).mem_toPartialHomeomorph_source
#align cont_diff_at.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source ContDiffAt.mem_toPartialHomeomorph_source
theorem image_mem_toPartialHomeomorph_target {n : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f a)
(hf' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕂] F) a) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
f a ∈ (hf.toPartialHomeomorph f hf' hn).target :=
(hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' hf' hn).image_mem_toPartialHomeomorph_target
#align cont_diff_at.image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target ContDiffAt.image_mem_toPartialHomeomorph_target
/-- Given a `ContDiff` function over `𝕂` (which is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) with an invertible derivative
at `a`, returns a function that is locally inverse to `f`. -/
def localInverse {n : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕂] F) a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : F → E :=
(hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' hf' hn).localInverse f f' a
#align cont_diff_at.local_inverse ContDiffAt.localInverse
theorem localInverse_apply_image {n : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f a)
(hf' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕂] F) a) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : hf.localInverse hf' hn (f a) = a :=
(hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' hf' hn).localInverse_apply_image
#align cont_diff_at.local_inverse_apply_image ContDiffAt.localInverse_apply_image
/-- Given a `ContDiff` function over `𝕂` (which is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) with an invertible derivative
at `a`, the inverse function (produced by `ContDiff.toPartialHomeomorph`) is
also `ContDiff`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/InverseFunctionTheorem/ContDiff.lean | 68 | 75 | theorem to_localInverse {n : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f a)
(hf' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕂] F) a) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiffAt 𝕂 n (hf.localInverse hf' hn) (f a) := by |
have := hf.localInverse_apply_image hf' hn
apply (hf.toPartialHomeomorph f hf' hn).contDiffAt_symm
(image_mem_toPartialHomeomorph_target hf hf' hn)
· convert hf'
· convert hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
#align_import linear_algebra.trace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4cf7ca0e69e048b006674cf4499e5c7d296a89e0"
/-!
# Trace of a linear map
This file defines the trace of a linear map.
See also `LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Trace.lean` for the trace of a matrix.
## Tags
linear_map, trace, diagonal
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
namespace LinearMap
open Matrix
open FiniteDimensional
open TensorProduct
section
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {M : Type v} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
variable {κ : Type*} [DecidableEq κ] [Fintype κ]
variable (b : Basis ι R M) (c : Basis κ R M)
/-- The trace of an endomorphism given a basis. -/
def traceAux : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
Matrix.traceLinearMap ι R R ∘ₗ ↑(LinearMap.toMatrix b b)
#align linear_map.trace_aux LinearMap.traceAux
-- Can't be `simp` because it would cause a loop.
theorem traceAux_def (b : Basis ι R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
traceAux R b f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.trace_aux_def LinearMap.traceAux_def
theorem traceAux_eq : traceAux R b = traceAux R c :=
LinearMap.ext fun f =>
calc
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) =
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b ((LinearMap.id.comp f).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.id_comp, LinearMap.comp_id]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id * LinearMap.toMatrix c c f *
LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f * LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id *
LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.trace_mul_comm]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c ((f.comp LinearMap.id).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ b, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f) := by rw [LinearMap.comp_id, LinearMap.comp_id]
#align linear_map.trace_aux_eq LinearMap.traceAux_eq
open scoped Classical
variable (M)
/-- Trace of an endomorphism independent of basis. -/
def trace : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) then traceAux R H.choose_spec.some else 0
#align linear_map.trace LinearMap.trace
variable {M}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `trace_eq_matrix_trace`. -/
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset {s : Finset M} (b : Basis s R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
have : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) := ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
rw [trace, dif_pos this, ← traceAux_def]
congr 1
apply traceAux_eq
#align linear_map.trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset LinearMap.trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset R b.reindexFinsetRange, ← traceAux_def, ← traceAux_def,
traceAux_eq R b b.reindexFinsetRange]
#align linear_map.trace_eq_matrix_trace LinearMap.trace_eq_matrix_trace
theorem trace_mul_comm (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) : trace R M (f * g) = trace R M (g * f) :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) then by
let ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := H
simp_rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, LinearMap.toMatrix_mul]
apply Matrix.trace_mul_comm
else by rw [trace, dif_neg H, LinearMap.zero_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply]
#align linear_map.trace_mul_comm LinearMap.trace_mul_comm
lemma trace_mul_cycle (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * g * h) = trace R M (h * f * g) := by
rw [LinearMap.trace_mul_comm, ← mul_assoc]
lemma trace_mul_cycle' (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * (g * h)) = trace R M (h * (f * g)) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, LinearMap.trace_mul_comm]
/-- The trace of an endomorphism is invariant under conjugation -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj (g : M →ₗ[R] M) (f : (M →ₗ[R] M)ˣ) :
trace R M (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = trace R M g := by
rw [trace_mul_comm]
simp
#align linear_map.trace_conj LinearMap.trace_conj
@[simp]
lemma trace_lie {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (f g : Module.End R M) :
trace R M ⁅f, g⁆ = 0 := by
rw [Ring.lie_def, map_sub, trace_mul_comm]
exact sub_self _
end
section
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (N P : Type*) [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [AddCommGroup P] [Module R P]
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- The trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under the isomorphism
`End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`-/
theorem trace_eq_contract_of_basis [Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
LinearMap.trace R M ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M M = contractLeft R M := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype ι
apply Basis.ext (Basis.tensorProduct (Basis.dualBasis b) b)
rintro ⟨i, j⟩
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Basis.tensorProduct_apply, Basis.coe_dualBasis, coe_comp]
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, toMatrix_dualTensorHom]
by_cases hij : i = j
· rw [hij]
simp
rw [Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_zero j i (1 : R) hij]
simp [Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, hij]
#align linear_map.trace_eq_contract_of_basis LinearMap.trace_eq_contract_of_basis
/-- The trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under the isomorphism
`End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`-/
theorem trace_eq_contract_of_basis' [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
LinearMap.trace R M = contractLeft R M ∘ₗ (dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis b).symm.toLinearMap := by
simp [LinearEquiv.eq_comp_toLinearMap_symm, trace_eq_contract_of_basis b]
#align linear_map.trace_eq_contract_of_basis' LinearMap.trace_eq_contract_of_basis'
variable (R M)
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R N] [Module.Finite R N]
[Module.Free R P] [Module.Finite R P]
/-- When `M` is finite free, the trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under
the isomorphism `End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`-/
@[simp]
theorem trace_eq_contract : LinearMap.trace R M ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M M = contractLeft R M :=
trace_eq_contract_of_basis (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M)
#align linear_map.trace_eq_contract LinearMap.trace_eq_contract
@[simp]
theorem trace_eq_contract_apply (x : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] M) :
(LinearMap.trace R M) ((dualTensorHom R M M) x) = contractLeft R M x := by
rw [← comp_apply, trace_eq_contract]
#align linear_map.trace_eq_contract_apply LinearMap.trace_eq_contract_apply
/-- When `M` is finite free, the trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under
the isomorphism `End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`-/
theorem trace_eq_contract' :
LinearMap.trace R M = contractLeft R M ∘ₗ (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).symm.toLinearMap :=
trace_eq_contract_of_basis' (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M)
#align linear_map.trace_eq_contract' LinearMap.trace_eq_contract'
/-- The trace of the identity endomorphism is the dimension of the free module -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_one : trace R M 1 = (finrank R M : R) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
have b := Module.Free.chooseBasis R M
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, toMatrix_one, finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
simp
#align linear_map.trace_one LinearMap.trace_one
/-- The trace of the identity endomorphism is the dimension of the free module -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_id : trace R M id = (finrank R M : R) := by rw [← one_eq_id, trace_one]
#align linear_map.trace_id LinearMap.trace_id
@[simp]
theorem trace_transpose : trace R (Module.Dual R M) ∘ₗ Module.Dual.transpose = trace R M := by
let e := dualTensorHomEquiv R M M
have h : Function.Surjective e.toLinearMap := e.surjective
refine (cancel_right h).1 ?_
ext f m; simp [e]
#align linear_map.trace_transpose LinearMap.trace_transpose
theorem trace_prodMap :
trace R (M × N) ∘ₗ prodMapLinear R M N M N R =
(coprod id id : R × R →ₗ[R] R) ∘ₗ prodMap (trace R M) (trace R N) := by
let e := (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).prod (dualTensorHomEquiv R N N)
have h : Function.Surjective e.toLinearMap := e.surjective
refine (cancel_right h).1 ?_
ext
· simp only [e, dualTensorHomEquiv, LinearEquiv.coe_prod, dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_toLinearMap,
AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, curry_apply, coe_restrictScalars, coe_comp, coe_inl,
Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, map_zero, prodMapLinear_apply, dualTensorHom_prodMap_zero,
trace_eq_contract_apply, contractLeft_apply, fst_apply, coprod_apply, id_coe, id_eq, add_zero]
· simp only [e, dualTensorHomEquiv, LinearEquiv.coe_prod, dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_toLinearMap,
AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, curry_apply, coe_restrictScalars, coe_comp, coe_inr,
Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, map_zero, prodMapLinear_apply, zero_prodMap_dualTensorHom,
trace_eq_contract_apply, contractLeft_apply, snd_apply, coprod_apply, id_coe, id_eq, zero_add]
#align linear_map.trace_prod_map LinearMap.trace_prodMap
variable {R M N P}
theorem trace_prodMap' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) :
trace R (M × N) (prodMap f g) = trace R M f + trace R N g := by
have h := ext_iff.1 (trace_prodMap R M N) (f, g)
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, coprod_apply, id_coe, id,
prodMapLinear_apply] at h
exact h
#align linear_map.trace_prod_map' LinearMap.trace_prodMap'
variable (R M N P)
open TensorProduct Function
theorem trace_tensorProduct : compr₂ (mapBilinear R M N M N) (trace R (M ⊗ N)) =
compl₁₂ (lsmul R R : R →ₗ[R] R →ₗ[R] R) (trace R M) (trace R N) := by
apply
(compl₁₂_inj (show Surjective (dualTensorHom R M M) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).surjective)
(show Surjective (dualTensorHom R N N) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R N N).surjective)).1
ext f m g n
simp only [AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, toFun_eq_coe, TensorProduct.curry_apply,
coe_restrictScalars, compl₁₂_apply, compr₂_apply, mapBilinear_apply,
trace_eq_contract_apply, contractLeft_apply, lsmul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
map_dualTensorHom, dualDistrib_apply]
#align linear_map.trace_tensor_product LinearMap.trace_tensorProduct
theorem trace_comp_comm :
compr₂ (llcomp R M N M) (trace R M) = compr₂ (llcomp R N M N).flip (trace R N) := by
apply
(compl₁₂_inj (show Surjective (dualTensorHom R N M) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R N M).surjective)
(show Surjective (dualTensorHom R M N) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R M N).surjective)).1
ext g m f n
simp only [AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply,
coe_restrictScalars, compl₁₂_apply, compr₂_apply, flip_apply, llcomp_apply',
comp_dualTensorHom, LinearMapClass.map_smul, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contractLeft_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align linear_map.trace_comp_comm LinearMap.trace_comp_comm
variable {R M N P}
@[simp]
theorem trace_transpose' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R _ (Module.Dual.transpose (R := R) f) = trace R M f := by
rw [← comp_apply, trace_transpose]
#align linear_map.trace_transpose' LinearMap.trace_transpose'
theorem trace_tensorProduct' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) :
trace R (M ⊗ N) (map f g) = trace R M f * trace R N g := by
have h := ext_iff.1 (ext_iff.1 (trace_tensorProduct R M N) f) g
simp only [compr₂_apply, mapBilinear_apply, compl₁₂_apply, lsmul_apply,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul] at h
exact h
#align linear_map.trace_tensor_product' LinearMap.trace_tensorProduct'
theorem trace_comp_comm' (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (g ∘ₗ f) = trace R N (f ∘ₗ g) := by
have h := ext_iff.1 (ext_iff.1 (trace_comp_comm R M N) g) f
simp only [llcomp_apply', compr₂_apply, flip_apply] at h
exact h
#align linear_map.trace_comp_comm' LinearMap.trace_comp_comm'
lemma trace_comp_cycle (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (h : P →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R P (g ∘ₗ f ∘ₗ h) = trace R N (f ∘ₗ h ∘ₗ g) := by
rw [trace_comp_comm', comp_assoc]
lemma trace_comp_cycle' (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (h : P →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R P ((g ∘ₗ f) ∘ₗ h) = trace R M ((h ∘ₗ g) ∘ₗ f) := by
rw [trace_comp_comm', ← comp_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : trace R N (e.conj f) = trace R M f := by
classical
by_cases hM : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M)
· obtain ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := hM
haveI := Module.Finite.of_basis b
haveI := (Module.free_def R M).mpr ⟨_, ⟨b⟩⟩
haveI := Module.Finite.of_basis (b.map e)
haveI := (Module.free_def R N).mpr ⟨_, ⟨(b.map e).reindex (e.toEquiv.image _)⟩⟩
rw [e.conj_apply, trace_comp_comm', ← comp_assoc, LinearEquiv.comp_coe,
LinearEquiv.self_trans_symm, LinearEquiv.refl_toLinearMap, id_comp]
· rw [trace, trace, dif_neg hM, dif_neg ?_, zero_apply, zero_apply]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
exact hM ⟨s.image e.symm, ⟨(b.map e.symm).reindex
((e.symm.toEquiv.image s).trans (Equiv.Set.ofEq Finset.coe_image.symm))⟩⟩
#align linear_map.trace_conj' LinearMap.trace_conj'
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Trace.lean | 310 | 313 | theorem IsProj.trace {p : Submodule R M} {f : M →ₗ[R] M} (h : IsProj p f) [Module.Free R p]
[Module.Finite R p] [Module.Free R (ker f)] [Module.Finite R (ker f)] :
trace R M f = (finrank R p : R) := by |
rw [h.eq_conj_prodMap, trace_conj', trace_prodMap', trace_id, map_zero, add_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
#align_import data.vector.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# Additional theorems and definitions about the `Vector` type
This file introduces the infix notation `::ᵥ` for `Vector.cons`.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace Vector
variable {α : Type*}
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ᵥ " => Vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Vector α n) :=
⟨ofFn default⟩
theorem toList_injective : Function.Injective (@toList α n) :=
Subtype.val_injective
#align vector.to_list_injective Vector.toList_injective
/-- Two `v w : Vector α n` are equal iff they are equal at every single index. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {v w : Vector α n} (_ : ∀ m : Fin n, Vector.get v m = Vector.get w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩, ⟨w, hw⟩, h =>
Subtype.eq (List.ext_get (by rw [hv, hw]) fun m hm _ => h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩)
#align vector.ext Vector.ext
/-- The empty `Vector` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance zero_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Vector α 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Vector.ext fun m => Fin.elim0 m⟩
#align vector.zero_subsingleton Vector.zero_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ v : Vector α n, (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align vector.cons_val Vector.cons_val
#align vector.cons_head Vector.head_cons
#align vector.cons_tail Vector.tail_cons
theorem eq_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v = a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head = a ∧ v.tail = v' :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨head_cons a v', tail_cons a v'⟩, fun h =>
_root_.trans (cons_head_tail v).symm (by rw [h.1, h.2])⟩
#align vector.eq_cons_iff Vector.eq_cons_iff
theorem ne_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v ≠ a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head ≠ a ∨ v.tail ≠ v' := by rw [Ne, eq_cons_iff a v v', not_and_or]
#align vector.ne_cons_iff Vector.ne_cons_iff
theorem exists_eq_cons (v : Vector α n.succ) : ∃ (a : α) (as : Vector α n), v = a ::ᵥ as :=
⟨v.head, v.tail, (eq_cons_iff v.head v v.tail).2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
#align vector.exists_eq_cons Vector.exists_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList_ofFn : ∀ {n} (f : Fin n → α), toList (ofFn f) = List.ofFn f
| 0, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_zero, toList, nil]
| n + 1, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_succ, toList_cons, toList_ofFn]
#align vector.to_list_of_fn Vector.toList_ofFn
@[simp]
theorem mk_toList : ∀ (v : Vector α n) (h), (⟨toList v, h⟩ : Vector α n) = v
| ⟨_, _⟩, _ => rfl
#align vector.mk_to_list Vector.mk_toList
@[simp] theorem length_val (v : Vector α n) : v.val.length = n := v.2
-- Porting note: not used in mathlib and coercions done differently in Lean 4
-- @[simp]
-- theorem length_coe (v : Vector α n) :
-- ((coe : { l : List α // l.length = n } → List α) v).length = n :=
-- v.2
#noalign vector.length_coe
@[simp]
theorem toList_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).toList = v.toList.map f := by cases v; rfl
#align vector.to_list_map Vector.toList_map
@[simp]
theorem head_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) : (v.map f).head = f v.head := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, head_cons, head_cons]
#align vector.head_map Vector.head_map
@[simp]
theorem tail_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).tail = v.tail.map f := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
#align vector.tail_map Vector.tail_map
theorem get_eq_get (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) :
v.get i = v.toList.get (Fin.cast v.toList_length.symm i) :=
rfl
#align vector.nth_eq_nth_le Vector.get_eq_getₓ
@[simp]
theorem get_replicate (a : α) (i : Fin n) : (Vector.replicate n a).get i = a := by
apply List.get_replicate
#align vector.nth_repeat Vector.get_replicate
@[simp]
theorem get_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) (i : Fin n) :
(v.map f).get i = f (v.get i) := by
cases v; simp [Vector.map, get_eq_get]; rfl
#align vector.nth_map Vector.get_map
@[simp]
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) : Vector.map₂ f nil nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_cons (hd₁ : α) (tl₁ : Vector α n) (hd₂ : β) (tl₂ : Vector β n) (f : α → β → γ) :
Vector.map₂ f (hd₁ ::ᵥ tl₁) (hd₂ ::ᵥ tl₂) = f hd₁ hd₂ ::ᵥ (Vector.map₂ f tl₁ tl₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Basic.lean | 144 | 147 | theorem get_ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) (i) : get (ofFn f) i = f i := by |
conv_rhs => erw [← List.get_ofFn f ⟨i, by simp⟩]
simp only [get_eq_get]
congr <;> simp [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Units
#align_import algebra.associated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
/-!
# Associated, prime, and irreducible elements.
In this file we define the predicate `Prime p`
saying that an element of a commutative monoid with zero is prime.
Namely, `Prime p` means that `p` isn't zero, it isn't a unit,
and `p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b` for all `a`, `b`;
In decomposition monoids (e.g., `ℕ`, `ℤ`), this predicate is equivalent to `Irreducible`,
however this is not true in general.
We also define an equivalence relation `Associated`
saying that two elements of a monoid differ by a multiplication by a unit.
Then we show that the quotient type `Associates` is a monoid
and prove basic properties of this quotient.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
section Prime
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
/-- An element `p` of a commutative monoid with zero (e.g., a ring) is called *prime*,
if it's not zero, not a unit, and `p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b` for all `a`, `b`. -/
def Prime (p : α) : Prop :=
p ≠ 0 ∧ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b
#align prime Prime
namespace Prime
variable {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
theorem ne_zero : p ≠ 0 :=
hp.1
#align prime.ne_zero Prime.ne_zero
theorem not_unit : ¬IsUnit p :=
hp.2.1
#align prime.not_unit Prime.not_unit
theorem not_dvd_one : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_one ·) hp.not_unit
#align prime.not_dvd_one Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem ne_one : p ≠ 1 := fun h => hp.2.1 (h.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
#align prime.ne_one Prime.ne_one
theorem dvd_or_dvd (hp : Prime p) {a b : α} (h : p ∣ a * b) : p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b :=
hp.2.2 a b h
#align prime.dvd_or_dvd Prime.dvd_or_dvd
theorem dvd_mul {a b : α} : p ∣ a * b ↔ p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b :=
⟨hp.dvd_or_dvd, (Or.elim · (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left · _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right · _))⟩
theorem isPrimal (hp : Prime p) : IsPrimal p := fun _a _b dvd ↦ (hp.dvd_or_dvd dvd).elim
(fun h ↦ ⟨p, 1, h, one_dvd _, (mul_one p).symm⟩) fun h ↦ ⟨1, p, one_dvd _, h, (one_mul p).symm⟩
theorem not_dvd_mul {a b : α} (ha : ¬ p ∣ a) (hb : ¬ p ∣ b) : ¬ p ∣ a * b :=
hp.dvd_mul.not.mpr <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem dvd_of_dvd_pow (hp : Prime p) {a : α} {n : ℕ} (h : p ∣ a ^ n) : p ∣ a := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero] at h
have := isUnit_of_dvd_one h
have := not_unit hp
contradiction
rw [pow_succ'] at h
cases' dvd_or_dvd hp h with dvd_a dvd_pow
· assumption
exact ih dvd_pow
#align prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow
theorem dvd_pow_iff_dvd {a : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∣ a ^ n ↔ p ∣ a :=
⟨hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow, (dvd_pow · hn)⟩
end Prime
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime (0 : α) := fun h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align not_prime_zero not_prime_zero
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime (1 : α) := fun h => h.not_unit isUnit_one
#align not_prime_one not_prime_one
section Map
variable [CommMonoidWithZero β] {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [FunLike F α β]
variable [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β] [FunLike G β α] [MulHomClass G β α]
variable (f : F) (g : G) {p : α}
theorem comap_prime (hinv : ∀ a, g (f a : β) = a) (hp : Prime (f p)) : Prime p :=
⟨fun h => hp.1 <| by simp [h], fun h => hp.2.1 <| h.map f, fun a b h => by
refine
(hp.2.2 (f a) (f b) <| by
convert map_dvd f h
simp).imp
?_ ?_ <;>
· intro h
convert ← map_dvd g h <;> apply hinv⟩
#align comap_prime comap_prime
theorem MulEquiv.prime_iff (e : α ≃* β) : Prime p ↔ Prime (e p) :=
⟨fun h => (comap_prime e.symm e fun a => by simp) <| (e.symm_apply_apply p).substr h,
comap_prime e e.symm fun a => by simp⟩
#align mul_equiv.prime_iff MulEquiv.prime_iff
end Map
end Prime
theorem Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
{a b : α} : a ∣ p * b → p ∣ a ∨ a ∣ b := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
rcases hp.2.2 a c (hc ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _) with (h | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' hp.ne_zero] at hc
exact Or.inr (hc.symm ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ a) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ b := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero]
exact one_dvd b
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := ih (dvd_trans (pow_dvd_pow p n.le_succ) h')
rw [pow_succ]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left _ ((hp.dvd_or_dvd _).resolve_left h)
rwa [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero), ← pow_succ, mul_left_comm]
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ b) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ a := by
rw [mul_comm] at h'
exact hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left n h h'
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
theorem Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α}
{n : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hpow : p ^ n.succ ∣ a ^ n.succ * b ^ n) (hb : ¬p ^ 2 ∣ b) : p ∣ a := by
-- Suppose `p ∣ b`, write `b = p * x` and `hy : a ^ n.succ * b ^ n = p ^ n.succ * y`.
cases' hp.dvd_or_dvd ((dvd_pow_self p (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).trans hpow) with H hbdiv
· exact hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow H
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hbdiv
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hpow
-- Then we can divide out a common factor of `p ^ n` from the equation `hy`.
have : a ^ n.succ * x ^ n = p * y := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero) ?_
rw [← mul_assoc _ p, ← pow_succ, ← hy, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc (a ^ n.succ), mul_comm _ (p ^ n),
mul_assoc]
-- So `p ∣ a` (and we're done) or `p ∣ x`, which can't be the case since it implies `p^2 ∣ b`.
refine hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow ((hp.dvd_or_dvd ⟨_, this⟩).resolve_right fun hdvdx => hb ?_)
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hdvdx
rw [pow_two, ← mul_assoc]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd
theorem prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p x y : α} (h : Prime p)
{i : ℕ} (hxy : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x * y) : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x ∨ p ∣ y := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro hy
induction' i with i ih generalizing x
· rw [pow_one] at hxy ⊢
exact (h.dvd_or_dvd hxy).resolve_right hy
rw [pow_succ'] at hxy ⊢
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := (h.dvd_or_dvd (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd hxy)).resolve_right hy
rw [mul_assoc] at hxy
exact mul_dvd_mul_left p (ih ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h.ne_zero).mp hxy))
#align prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul
/-- `Irreducible p` states that `p` is non-unit and only factors into units.
We explicitly avoid stating that `p` is non-zero, this would require a semiring. Assuming only a
monoid allows us to reuse irreducible for associated elements.
-/
structure Irreducible [Monoid α] (p : α) : Prop where
/-- `p` is not a unit -/
not_unit : ¬IsUnit p
/-- if `p` factors then one factor is a unit -/
isUnit_or_isUnit' : ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b
#align irreducible Irreducible
namespace Irreducible
theorem not_dvd_one [CommMonoid α] {p : α} (hp : Irreducible p) : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_one ·) hp.not_unit
#align irreducible.not_dvd_one Irreducible.not_dvd_one
theorem isUnit_or_isUnit [Monoid α] {p : α} (hp : Irreducible p) {a b : α} (h : p = a * b) :
IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
hp.isUnit_or_isUnit' a b h
#align irreducible.is_unit_or_is_unit Irreducible.isUnit_or_isUnit
end Irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p : α} :
Irreducible p ↔ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
#align irreducible_iff irreducible_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_one [Monoid α] : ¬Irreducible (1 : α) := by simp [irreducible_iff]
#align not_irreducible_one not_irreducible_one
theorem Irreducible.ne_one [Monoid α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 1
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_one hp
#align irreducible.ne_one Irreducible.ne_one
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ¬Irreducible (0 : α)
| ⟨hn0, h⟩ =>
have : IsUnit (0 : α) ∨ IsUnit (0 : α) := h 0 0 (mul_zero 0).symm
this.elim hn0 hn0
#align not_irreducible_zero not_irreducible_zero
theorem Irreducible.ne_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 0
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_zero hp
#align irreducible.ne_zero Irreducible.ne_zero
theorem of_irreducible_mul {α} [Monoid α] {x y : α} : Irreducible (x * y) → IsUnit x ∨ IsUnit y
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h _ _ rfl
#align of_irreducible_mul of_irreducible_mul
theorem not_irreducible_pow {α} [Monoid α] {x : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) :
¬ Irreducible (x ^ n) := by
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
have := h₂ _ _ (pow_succ _ _)
rw [isUnit_pow_iff (Nat.succ_ne_succ.mp hn), or_self] at this
exact h₁ (this.pow _)
#noalign of_irreducible_pow
theorem irreducible_or_factor {α} [Monoid α] (x : α) (h : ¬IsUnit x) :
Irreducible x ∨ ∃ a b, ¬IsUnit a ∧ ¬IsUnit b ∧ a * b = x := by
haveI := Classical.dec
refine or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun H => ?_
simp? [h, irreducible_iff] at H ⊢ says
simp only [exists_and_left, not_exists, not_and, irreducible_iff, h, not_false_eq_true,
true_and] at H ⊢
refine fun a b h => by_contradiction fun o => ?_
simp? [not_or] at o says simp only [not_or] at o
exact H _ o.1 _ o.2 h.symm
#align irreducible_or_factor irreducible_or_factor
/-- If `p` and `q` are irreducible, then `p ∣ q` implies `q ∣ p`. -/
theorem Irreducible.dvd_symm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q → q ∣ p := by
rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
rw [IsUnit.mul_right_dvd (Or.resolve_left (of_irreducible_mul hq) hp.not_unit)]
#align irreducible.dvd_symm Irreducible.dvd_symm
theorem Irreducible.dvd_comm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q ↔ q ∣ p :=
⟨hp.dvd_symm hq, hq.dvd_symm hp⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_comm Irreducible.dvd_comm
section
variable [Monoid α]
theorem irreducible_units_mul (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (↑a * b) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_units_mul, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← a.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← a⁻¹.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align irreducible_units_mul irreducible_units_mul
theorem irreducible_isUnit_mul {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_units_mul a b
#align irreducible_is_unit_mul irreducible_isUnit_mul
theorem irreducible_mul_units (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (b * ↑a) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_mul_units, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a⁻¹]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]
#align irreducible_mul_units irreducible_mul_units
theorem irreducible_mul_isUnit {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (b * a) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_mul_units a b
#align irreducible_mul_is_unit irreducible_mul_isUnit
theorem irreducible_mul_iff {a b : α} :
Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible a ∧ IsUnit b ∨ Irreducible b ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· refine fun h => Or.imp (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (h.isUnit_or_isUnit rfl).symm
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit h'] at h
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul h'] at h
· rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩ | ⟨hb, ha⟩)
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit hb]
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul ha]
#align irreducible_mul_iff irreducible_mul_iff
end
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a : α}
theorem Irreducible.not_square (ha : Irreducible a) : ¬IsSquare a := by
rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq]
rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact not_irreducible_pow (by decide) ha
#align irreducible.not_square Irreducible.not_square
theorem IsSquare.not_irreducible (ha : IsSquare a) : ¬Irreducible a := fun h => h.not_square ha
#align is_square.not_irreducible IsSquare.not_irreducible
end CommMonoid
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
theorem Irreducible.prime_of_isPrimal {a : α}
(irr : Irreducible a) (primal : IsPrimal a) : Prime a :=
⟨irr.ne_zero, irr.not_unit, fun a b dvd ↦ by
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ := primal dvd
exact (of_irreducible_mul irr).symm.imp (·.mul_right_dvd.mpr h₁) (·.mul_left_dvd.mpr h₂)⟩
theorem Irreducible.prime [DecompositionMonoid α] {a : α} (irr : Irreducible a) : Prime a :=
irr.prime_of_isPrimal (DecompositionMonoid.primal a)
end CommMonoidWithZero
section CancelCommMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a p : α}
protected theorem Prime.irreducible (hp : Prime p) : Irreducible p :=
⟨hp.not_unit, fun a b ↦ by
rintro rfl
exact (hp.dvd_or_dvd dvd_rfl).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_dvd_one <| (mul_dvd_mul_iff_right <| right_ne_zero_of_mul hp.ne_zero).mp <|
dvd_mul_of_dvd_right · _)
(isUnit_of_dvd_one <| (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left <| left_ne_zero_of_mul hp.ne_zero).mp <|
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left · _)⟩
#align prime.irreducible Prime.irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff_prime [DecompositionMonoid α] {a : α} : Irreducible a ↔ Prime a :=
⟨Irreducible.prime, Prime.irreducible⟩
theorem succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul (hp : Prime p) {a b : α} {k l : ℕ} :
p ^ k ∣ a → p ^ l ∣ b → p ^ (k + l + 1) ∣ a * b → p ^ (k + 1) ∣ a ∨ p ^ (l + 1) ∣ b :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ⟨z, hz⟩ =>
have h : p ^ (k + l) * (x * y) = p ^ (k + l) * (p * z) := by
simpa [mul_comm, pow_add, hx, hy, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm] using hz
have hp0 : p ^ (k + l) ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero
have hpd : p ∣ x * y := ⟨z, by rwa [mul_right_inj' hp0] at h⟩
(hp.dvd_or_dvd hpd).elim
(fun ⟨d, hd⟩ => Or.inl ⟨d, by simp [*, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]⟩)
fun ⟨d, hd⟩ => Or.inr ⟨d, by simp [*, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]⟩
#align succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.not_square (hp : Prime p) : ¬IsSquare p :=
hp.irreducible.not_square
#align prime.not_square Prime.not_square
theorem IsSquare.not_prime (ha : IsSquare a) : ¬Prime a := fun h => h.not_square ha
#align is_square.not_prime IsSquare.not_prime
theorem not_prime_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ¬Prime (a ^ n) := fun hp =>
not_irreducible_pow hn hp.irreducible
#align pow_not_prime not_prime_pow
end CancelCommMonoidWithZero
/-- Two elements of a `Monoid` are `Associated` if one of them is another one
multiplied by a unit on the right. -/
def Associated [Monoid α] (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ u : αˣ, x * u = y
#align associated Associated
/-- Notation for two elements of a monoid are associated, i.e.
if one of them is another one multiplied by a unit on the right. -/
local infixl:50 " ~ᵤ " => Associated
namespace Associated
@[refl]
protected theorem refl [Monoid α] (x : α) : x ~ᵤ x :=
⟨1, by simp⟩
#align associated.refl Associated.refl
protected theorem rfl [Monoid α] {x : α} : x ~ᵤ x :=
.refl x
instance [Monoid α] : IsRefl α Associated :=
⟨Associated.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm [Monoid α] : ∀ {x y : α}, x ~ᵤ y → y ~ᵤ x
| x, _, ⟨u, rfl⟩ => ⟨u⁻¹, by rw [mul_assoc, Units.mul_inv, mul_one]⟩
#align associated.symm Associated.symm
instance [Monoid α] : IsSymm α Associated :=
⟨fun _ _ => Associated.symm⟩
protected theorem comm [Monoid α] {x y : α} : x ~ᵤ y ↔ y ~ᵤ x :=
⟨Associated.symm, Associated.symm⟩
#align associated.comm Associated.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans [Monoid α] : ∀ {x y z : α}, x ~ᵤ y → y ~ᵤ z → x ~ᵤ z
| x, _, _, ⟨u, rfl⟩, ⟨v, rfl⟩ => ⟨u * v, by rw [Units.val_mul, mul_assoc]⟩
#align associated.trans Associated.trans
instance [Monoid α] : IsTrans α Associated :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => Associated.trans⟩
/-- The setoid of the relation `x ~ᵤ y` iff there is a unit `u` such that `x * u = y` -/
protected def setoid (α : Type*) [Monoid α] :
Setoid α where
r := Associated
iseqv := ⟨Associated.refl, Associated.symm, Associated.trans⟩
#align associated.setoid Associated.setoid
theorem map {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N]
(f : F) {x y : M} (ha : Associated x y) : Associated (f x) (f y) := by
obtain ⟨u, ha⟩ := ha
exact ⟨Units.map f u, by rw [← ha, map_mul, Units.coe_map, MonoidHom.coe_coe]⟩
end Associated
attribute [local instance] Associated.setoid
theorem unit_associated_one [Monoid α] {u : αˣ} : (u : α) ~ᵤ 1 :=
⟨u⁻¹, Units.mul_inv u⟩
#align unit_associated_one unit_associated_one
@[simp]
theorem associated_one_iff_isUnit [Monoid α] {a : α} : (a : α) ~ᵤ 1 ↔ IsUnit a :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨c, h⟩ := h.symm
h ▸ ⟨c, (one_mul _).symm⟩)
fun ⟨c, h⟩ => Associated.symm ⟨c, by simp [h]⟩
#align associated_one_iff_is_unit associated_one_iff_isUnit
@[simp]
theorem associated_zero_iff_eq_zero [MonoidWithZero α] (a : α) : a ~ᵤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨u, h⟩ := h.symm
simpa using h.symm)
fun h => h ▸ Associated.refl a
#align associated_zero_iff_eq_zero associated_zero_iff_eq_zero
theorem associated_one_of_mul_eq_one [CommMonoid α] {a : α} (b : α) (hab : a * b = 1) : a ~ᵤ 1 :=
show (Units.mkOfMulEqOne a b hab : α) ~ᵤ 1 from unit_associated_one
#align associated_one_of_mul_eq_one associated_one_of_mul_eq_one
theorem associated_one_of_associated_mul_one [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} : a * b ~ᵤ 1 → a ~ᵤ 1
| ⟨u, h⟩ => associated_one_of_mul_eq_one (b * u) <| by simpa [mul_assoc] using h
#align associated_one_of_associated_mul_one associated_one_of_associated_mul_one
theorem associated_mul_unit_left {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) a :=
let ⟨u', hu⟩ := hu
⟨u'⁻¹, hu ▸ Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _⟩
#align associated_mul_unit_left associated_mul_unit_left
theorem associated_unit_mul_left {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) a := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu
#align associated_unit_mul_left associated_unit_mul_left
theorem associated_mul_unit_right {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (a * u) :=
(associated_mul_unit_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_mul_unit_right associated_mul_unit_right
theorem associated_unit_mul_right {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * a) :=
(associated_unit_mul_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_unit_mul_right associated_unit_mul_right
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
⟨(associated_mul_unit_right _ _ hu).trans, (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu).trans⟩
#align associated_mul_is_unit_left_iff associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {u a b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) b ↔ Associated a b := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu
#align associated_is_unit_mul_left_iff associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b u : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_mul_is_unit_right_iff associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_is_unit_mul_right_iff associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_left_iff associated_mul_unit_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (↑u * a) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_left_iff associated_unit_mul_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_right_iff associated_mul_unit_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (↑u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_right_iff associated_unit_mul_right_iff
theorem Associated.mul_left [Monoid α] (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a * b ~ᵤ a * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_left Associated.mul_left
theorem Associated.mul_right [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) (c : α) : a * c ~ᵤ b * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_right_comm _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_right Associated.mul_right
theorem Associated.mul_mul [CommMonoid α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
(h₁ : a₁ ~ᵤ b₁) (h₂ : a₂ ~ᵤ b₂) : a₁ * a₂ ~ᵤ b₁ * b₂ := (h₁.mul_right _).trans (h₂.mul_left _)
#align associated.mul_mul Associated.mul_mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Associated.lean | 563 | 566 | theorem Associated.pow_pow [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ^ n ~ᵤ b ^ n := by |
induction' n with n ih
· simp [Associated.refl]
convert h.mul_mul ih <;> rw [pow_succ']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.Util.AddRelatedDecl
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint
/-!
# Tools to reformulate category-theoretic lemmas in concrete categories
## The `elementwise` attribute
The `elementwise` attribute generates lemmas for concrete categories from lemmas
that equate morphisms in a category.
A sort of inverse to this for the `Type*` category is the `@[higher_order]` attribute.
For more details, see the documentation attached to the `syntax` declaration.
## Main definitions
- The `@[elementwise]` attribute.
- The ``elementwise_of% h` term elaborator.
## Implementation
This closely follows the implementation of the `@[reassoc]` attribute, due to Simon Hudon and
reimplemented by Scott Morrison in Lean 4.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
open Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Tactic.Elementwise
open CategoryTheory
section theorems
theorem forall_congr_forget_Type (α : Type u) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ (x : (forget (Type u)).obj α), p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α), p x := Iff.rfl
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.instFunLike ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort
theorem forget_hom_Type (α β : Type u) (f : α ⟶ β) : DFunLike.coe f = f := rfl
| Mathlib/Tactic/CategoryTheory/Elementwise.lean | 52 | 53 | theorem hom_elementwise [Category C] [ConcreteCategory C]
{X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f = g) (x : X) : f x = g x := by | rw [h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Balanced
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.LiftingProperties.Basic
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.strong_epi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Strong epimorphisms
In this file, we define strong epimorphisms. A strong epimorphism is an epimorphism `f`
which has the (unique) left lifting property with respect to monomorphisms. Similarly,
a strong monomorphisms in a monomorphism which has the (unique) right lifting property
with respect to epimorphisms.
## Main results
Besides the definition, we show that
* the composition of two strong epimorphisms is a strong epimorphism,
* if `f ≫ g` is a strong epimorphism, then so is `g`,
* if `f` is both a strong epimorphism and a monomorphism, then it is an isomorphism
We also define classes `StrongMonoCategory` and `StrongEpiCategory` for categories in which
every monomorphism or epimorphism is strong, and deduce that these categories are balanced.
## TODO
Show that the dual of a strong epimorphism is a strong monomorphism, and vice versa.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 1*][borceux-vol1]
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {P Q : C}
/-- A strong epimorphism `f` is an epimorphism which has the left lifting property
with respect to monomorphisms. -/
class StrongEpi (f : P ⟶ Q) : Prop where
/-- The epimorphism condition on `f` -/
epi : Epi f
/-- The left lifting property with respect to all monomorphism -/
llp : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (z : X ⟶ Y) [Mono z], HasLiftingProperty f z
#align category_theory.strong_epi CategoryTheory.StrongEpi
#align category_theory.strong_epi.epi CategoryTheory.StrongEpi.epi
theorem StrongEpi.mk' {f : P ⟶ Q} [Epi f]
(hf : ∀ (X Y : C) (z : X ⟶ Y)
(_ : Mono z) (u : P ⟶ X) (v : Q ⟶ Y) (sq : CommSq u f z v), sq.HasLift) :
StrongEpi f :=
{ epi := inferInstance
llp := fun {X Y} z hz => ⟨fun {u v} sq => hf X Y z hz u v sq⟩ }
#align category_theory.strong_epi.mk' CategoryTheory.StrongEpi.mk'
/-- A strong monomorphism `f` is a monomorphism which has the right lifting property
with respect to epimorphisms. -/
class StrongMono (f : P ⟶ Q) : Prop where
/-- The monomorphism condition on `f` -/
mono : Mono f
/-- The right lifting property with respect to all epimorphisms -/
rlp : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (z : X ⟶ Y) [Epi z], HasLiftingProperty z f
#align category_theory.strong_mono CategoryTheory.StrongMono
theorem StrongMono.mk' {f : P ⟶ Q} [Mono f]
(hf : ∀ (X Y : C) (z : X ⟶ Y) (_ : Epi z) (u : X ⟶ P)
(v : Y ⟶ Q) (sq : CommSq u z f v), sq.HasLift) : StrongMono f where
mono := inferInstance
rlp := fun {X Y} z hz => ⟨fun {u v} sq => hf X Y z hz u v sq⟩
#align category_theory.strong_mono.mk' CategoryTheory.StrongMono.mk'
attribute [instance 100] StrongEpi.llp
attribute [instance 100] StrongMono.rlp
instance (priority := 100) epi_of_strongEpi (f : P ⟶ Q) [StrongEpi f] : Epi f :=
StrongEpi.epi
#align category_theory.epi_of_strong_epi CategoryTheory.epi_of_strongEpi
instance (priority := 100) mono_of_strongMono (f : P ⟶ Q) [StrongMono f] : Mono f :=
StrongMono.mono
#align category_theory.mono_of_strong_mono CategoryTheory.mono_of_strongMono
section
variable {R : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R)
/-- The composition of two strong epimorphisms is a strong epimorphism. -/
theorem strongEpi_comp [StrongEpi f] [StrongEpi g] : StrongEpi (f ≫ g) :=
{ epi := epi_comp _ _
llp := by
intros
infer_instance }
#align category_theory.strong_epi_comp CategoryTheory.strongEpi_comp
/-- The composition of two strong monomorphisms is a strong monomorphism. -/
theorem strongMono_comp [StrongMono f] [StrongMono g] : StrongMono (f ≫ g) :=
{ mono := mono_comp _ _
rlp := by
intros
infer_instance }
#align category_theory.strong_mono_comp CategoryTheory.strongMono_comp
/-- If `f ≫ g` is a strong epimorphism, then so is `g`. -/
theorem strongEpi_of_strongEpi [StrongEpi (f ≫ g)] : StrongEpi g :=
{ epi := epi_of_epi f g
llp := fun {X Y} z _ => by
constructor
intro u v sq
have h₀ : (f ≫ u) ≫ z = (f ≫ g) ≫ v := by simp only [Category.assoc, sq.w]
exact
CommSq.HasLift.mk'
⟨(CommSq.mk h₀).lift, by
simp only [← cancel_mono z, Category.assoc, CommSq.fac_right, sq.w], by simp⟩ }
#align category_theory.strong_epi_of_strong_epi CategoryTheory.strongEpi_of_strongEpi
/-- If `f ≫ g` is a strong monomorphism, then so is `f`. -/
theorem strongMono_of_strongMono [StrongMono (f ≫ g)] : StrongMono f :=
{ mono := mono_of_mono f g
rlp := fun {X Y} z => by
intros
constructor
intro u v sq
have h₀ : u ≫ f ≫ g = z ≫ v ≫ g := by
rw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker sq.w, Category.assoc]
exact CommSq.HasLift.mk' ⟨(CommSq.mk h₀).lift, by simp, by simp [← cancel_epi z, sq.w]⟩ }
#align category_theory.strong_mono_of_strong_mono CategoryTheory.strongMono_of_strongMono
/-- An isomorphism is in particular a strong epimorphism. -/
instance (priority := 100) strongEpi_of_isIso [IsIso f] : StrongEpi f where
epi := by infer_instance
llp {X Y} z := HasLiftingProperty.of_left_iso _ _
#align category_theory.strong_epi_of_is_iso CategoryTheory.strongEpi_of_isIso
/-- An isomorphism is in particular a strong monomorphism. -/
instance (priority := 100) strongMono_of_isIso [IsIso f] : StrongMono f where
mono := by infer_instance
rlp {X Y} z := HasLiftingProperty.of_right_iso _ _
#align category_theory.strong_mono_of_is_iso CategoryTheory.strongMono_of_isIso
theorem StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) [h : StrongEpi f] : StrongEpi g :=
{ epi := by
rw [Arrow.iso_w' e]
haveI := epi_comp f e.hom.right
apply epi_comp
llp := fun {X Y} z => by
intro
apply HasLiftingProperty.of_arrow_iso_left e z }
#align category_theory.strong_epi.of_arrow_iso CategoryTheory.StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso
theorem StrongMono.of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) [h : StrongMono f] : StrongMono g :=
{ mono := by
rw [Arrow.iso_w' e]
haveI := mono_comp f e.hom.right
apply mono_comp
rlp := fun {X Y} z => by
intro
apply HasLiftingProperty.of_arrow_iso_right z e }
#align category_theory.strong_mono.of_arrow_iso CategoryTheory.StrongMono.of_arrow_iso
theorem StrongEpi.iff_of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) : StrongEpi f ↔ StrongEpi g := by
constructor <;> intro
exacts [StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso e, StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso e.symm]
#align category_theory.strong_epi.iff_of_arrow_iso CategoryTheory.StrongEpi.iff_of_arrow_iso
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/StrongEpi.lean | 178 | 181 | theorem StrongMono.iff_of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) : StrongMono f ↔ StrongMono g := by |
constructor <;> intro
exacts [StrongMono.of_arrow_iso e, StrongMono.of_arrow_iso e.symm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Interval
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ConditionallyCompleteOrder
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Discrete
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Bounded
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Archimedean
#align_import topology.instances.int from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Topology on the integers
The structure of a metric space on `ℤ` is introduced in this file, induced from `ℝ`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Metric Set Filter
namespace Int
instance : Dist ℤ :=
⟨fun x y => dist (x : ℝ) y⟩
theorem dist_eq (x y : ℤ) : dist x y = |(x : ℝ) - y| := rfl
#align int.dist_eq Int.dist_eq
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/Int.lean | 34 | 34 | theorem dist_eq' (m n : ℤ) : dist m n = |m - n| := by | rw [dist_eq]; norm_cast
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DirectSum.Finsupp
#align_import ring_theory.tensor_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"88fcdc3da43943f5b01925deddaa5bf0c0e85e4e"
/-!
# The tensor product of R-algebras
This file provides results about the multiplicative structure on `A ⊗[R] B` when `R` is a
commutative (semi)ring and `A` and `B` are both `R`-algebras. On these tensor products,
multiplication is characterized by `(a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)`.
## Main declarations
- `LinearMap.baseChange A f` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗ f`, for an `R`-linear map `f`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.semiring`: the ring structure on `A ⊗[R] B` for two `R`-algebras `A`, `B`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.leftAlgebra`: the `S`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`, for when `A` is
additionally an `S` algebra.
- the structure isomorphisms
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[S] A` (usually used with `S = R` or `S = A`)
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.comm : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc : ((A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C) ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] (B ⊗[R] C))`
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.liftEquiv`: a universal property for the tensor product of algebras.
## References
* [C. Kassel, *Quantum Groups* (§II.4)][Kassel1995]
-/
suppress_compilation
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
namespace LinearMap
open TensorProduct
/-!
### The base-change of a linear map of `R`-modules to a linear map of `A`-modules
-/
section Semiring
variable {R A B M N P : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
variable (r : R) (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
variable (A)
/-- `baseChange A f` for `f : M →ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`.
This "base change" operation is also known as "extension of scalars". -/
def baseChange (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.map (LinearMap.id : A →ₗ[A] A) f
#align linear_map.base_change LinearMap.baseChange
variable {A}
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_tmul (a : A) (x : M) : f.baseChange A (a ⊗ₜ x) = a ⊗ₜ f x :=
rfl
#align linear_map.base_change_tmul LinearMap.baseChange_tmul
theorem baseChange_eq_ltensor : (f.baseChange A : A ⊗ M → A ⊗ N) = f.lTensor A :=
rfl
#align linear_map.base_change_eq_ltensor LinearMap.baseChange_eq_ltensor
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_add : (f + g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A + g.baseChange A := by
ext
-- Porting note: added `-baseChange_tmul`
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, -baseChange_tmul]
#align linear_map.base_change_add LinearMap.baseChange_add
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_zero : baseChange A (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor]
#align linear_map.base_change_zero LinearMap.baseChange_zero
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_smul : (r • f).baseChange A = r • f.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_tmul]
#align linear_map.base_change_smul LinearMap.baseChange_smul
@[simp]
lemma baseChange_id : (.id : M →ₗ[R] M).baseChange A = .id := by
ext; simp
lemma baseChange_comp (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
(g ∘ₗ f).baseChange A = g.baseChange A ∘ₗ f.baseChange A := by
ext; simp
variable (R M) in
@[simp]
lemma baseChange_one : (1 : Module.End R M).baseChange A = 1 := baseChange_id
lemma baseChange_mul (f g : Module.End R M) :
(f * g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A * g.baseChange A := by
ext; simp
variable (R A M N)
/-- `baseChange` as a linear map.
When `M = N`, this is true more strongly as `Module.End.baseChangeHom`. -/
@[simps]
def baseChangeHom : (M →ₗ[R] N) →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N where
toFun := baseChange A
map_add' := baseChange_add
map_smul' := baseChange_smul
#align linear_map.base_change_hom LinearMap.baseChangeHom
/-- `baseChange` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps!]
def _root_.Module.End.baseChangeHom : Module.End R M →ₐ[R] Module.End A (A ⊗[R] M) :=
.ofLinearMap (LinearMap.baseChangeHom _ _ _ _) (baseChange_one _ _) baseChange_mul
lemma baseChange_pow (f : Module.End R M) (n : ℕ) :
(f ^ n).baseChange A = f.baseChange A ^ n :=
map_pow (Module.End.baseChangeHom _ _ _) f n
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {R A B M N : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [Ring A] [Algebra R A] [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
variable (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_sub : (f - g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A - g.baseChange A := by
ext
-- Porting note: `tmul_sub` wasn't needed in mathlib3
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, tmul_sub]
#align linear_map.base_change_sub LinearMap.baseChange_sub
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_neg : (-f).baseChange A = -f.baseChange A := by
ext
-- Porting note: `tmul_neg` wasn't needed in mathlib3
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, tmul_neg]
#align linear_map.base_change_neg LinearMap.baseChange_neg
end Ring
end LinearMap
namespace Algebra
namespace TensorProduct
universe uR uS uA uB uC uD uE uF
variable {R : Type uR} {S : Type uS}
variable {A : Type uA} {B : Type uB} {C : Type uC} {D : Type uD} {E : Type uE} {F : Type uF}
/-!
### The `R`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`
-/
section AddCommMonoidWithOne
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoidWithOne A] [Module R A]
variable [AddCommMonoidWithOne B] [Module R B]
instance : One (A ⊗[R] B) where one := 1 ⊗ₜ 1
theorem one_def : (1 : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.one_def Algebra.TensorProduct.one_def
instance instAddCommMonoidWithOne : AddCommMonoidWithOne (A ⊗[R] B) where
natCast n := n ⊗ₜ 1
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ n := by simp [add_tmul, one_def]
add_comm := add_comm
theorem natCast_def (n : ℕ) : (n : A ⊗[R] B) = (n : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) := rfl
theorem natCast_def' (n : ℕ) : (n : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (n : B) := by
rw [natCast_def, ← nsmul_one, smul_tmul, nsmul_one]
end AddCommMonoidWithOne
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
#noalign algebra.tensor_product.mul_aux
#noalign algebra.tensor_product.mul_aux_apply
/-- (Implementation detail)
The multiplication map on `A ⊗[R] B`,
as an `R`-bilinear map.
-/
def mul : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] B :=
TensorProduct.map₂ (LinearMap.mul R A) (LinearMap.mul R B)
#align algebra.tensor_product.mul Algebra.TensorProduct.mul
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
mul (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.mul_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_apply
-- providing this instance separately makes some downstream code substantially faster
instance instMul : Mul (A ⊗[R] B) where
mul a b := mul a b
@[simp]
theorem tmul_mul_tmul (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁ * a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.tmul_mul_tmul Algebra.TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul
theorem _root_.SemiconjBy.tmul {a₁ a₂ a₃ : A} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : B}
(ha : SemiconjBy a₁ a₂ a₃) (hb : SemiconjBy b₁ b₂ b₃) :
SemiconjBy (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) (a₃ ⊗ₜ[R] b₃) :=
congr_arg₂ (· ⊗ₜ[R] ·) ha.eq hb.eq
nonrec theorem _root_.Commute.tmul {a₁ a₂ : A} {b₁ b₂ : B}
(ha : Commute a₁ a₂) (hb : Commute b₁ b₂) :
Commute (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) :=
ha.tmul hb
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
left_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
right_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
zero_mul a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_zero a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
-- we want `isScalarTower_right` to take priority since it's better for unification elsewhere
instance (priority := 100) isScalarTower_right [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S A]
[IsScalarTower S A A] [SMulCommClass R S A] : IsScalarTower S (A ⊗[R] B) (A ⊗[R] B) where
smul_assoc r x y := by
change r • x * y = r • (x * y)
induction y using TensorProduct.induction_on with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a b => induction x using TensorProduct.induction_on with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a' b' =>
dsimp
rw [TensorProduct.smul_tmul', TensorProduct.smul_tmul', tmul_mul_tmul, smul_mul_assoc]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, add_mul _, *]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, mul_add _, *]
#align algebra.tensor_product.is_scalar_tower_right Algebra.TensorProduct.isScalarTower_right
-- we want `Algebra.to_smulCommClass` to take priority since it's better for unification elsewhere
instance (priority := 100) sMulCommClass_right [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S A]
[SMulCommClass S A A] [SMulCommClass R S A] : SMulCommClass S (A ⊗[R] B) (A ⊗[R] B) where
smul_comm r x y := by
change r • (x * y) = x * r • y
induction y using TensorProduct.induction_on with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a b => induction x using TensorProduct.induction_on with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a' b' =>
dsimp
rw [TensorProduct.smul_tmul', TensorProduct.smul_tmul', tmul_mul_tmul, mul_smul_comm]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, add_mul _, *]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, mul_add _, *]
#align algebra.tensor_product.smul_comm_class_right Algebra.TensorProduct.sMulCommClass_right
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
protected theorem one_mul (x : A ⊗[R] B) : mul (1 ⊗ₜ 1) x = x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align algebra.tensor_product.one_mul Algebra.TensorProduct.one_mul
protected theorem mul_one (x : A ⊗[R] B) : mul x (1 ⊗ₜ 1) = x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align algebra.tensor_product.mul_one Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_one
instance instNonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
one_mul := Algebra.TensorProduct.one_mul
mul_one := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_one
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
__ := instAddCommMonoidWithOne
end NonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
protected theorem mul_assoc (x y z : A ⊗[R] B) : mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z) := by
-- restate as an equality of morphisms so that we can use `ext`
suffices LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ mul ∘ₗ mul =
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ LinearMap.lflip <| LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ mul.flip ∘ₗ mul).flip by
exact DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun this x) y) z
ext xa xb ya yb za zb
exact congr_arg₂ (· ⊗ₜ ·) (mul_assoc xa ya za) (mul_assoc xb yb zb)
#align algebra.tensor_product.mul_assoc Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_assoc
instance instNonUnitalSemiring : NonUnitalSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
mul_assoc := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_assoc
end NonUnitalSemiring
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra R C]
instance instSemiring : Semiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
left_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
right_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
zero_mul a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_zero a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_assoc := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_assoc
one_mul := Algebra.TensorProduct.one_mul
mul_one := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_one
natCast_zero := AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_zero
natCast_succ := AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_succ
@[simp]
theorem tmul_pow (a : A) (b : B) (k : ℕ) : a ⊗ₜ[R] b ^ k = (a ^ k) ⊗ₜ[R] (b ^ k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp [one_def]
· simp [pow_succ, ih]
#align algebra.tensor_product.tmul_pow Algebra.TensorProduct.tmul_pow
/-- The ring morphism `A →+* A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
@[simps]
def includeLeftRingHom : A →+* A ⊗[R] B where
toFun a := a ⊗ₜ 1
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := by simp [add_tmul]
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by simp
#align algebra.tensor_product.include_left_ring_hom Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeftRingHom
variable [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S A]
instance leftAlgebra [SMulCommClass R S A] : Algebra S (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ commutes' := fun r x => by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply, includeLeftRingHom_apply]
rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← smul_tmul', ← one_def, mul_smul_comm, smul_mul_assoc, mul_one,
one_mul]
smul_def' := fun r x => by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply, includeLeftRingHom_apply]
rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← smul_tmul', smul_mul_assoc, ← one_def, one_mul]
toRingHom := TensorProduct.includeLeftRingHom.comp (algebraMap S A) }
#align algebra.tensor_product.left_algebra Algebra.TensorProduct.leftAlgebra
example : (algebraNat : Algebra ℕ (ℕ ⊗[ℕ] B)) = leftAlgebra := rfl
-- This is for the `undergrad.yaml` list.
/-- The tensor product of two `R`-algebras is an `R`-algebra. -/
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (A ⊗[R] B) :=
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply [SMulCommClass R S A] (r : S) :
algebraMap S (A ⊗[R] B) r = (algebraMap S A) r ⊗ₜ 1 :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.algebra_map_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.algebraMap_apply
theorem algebraMap_apply' (r : R) :
algebraMap R (A ⊗[R] B) r = 1 ⊗ₜ algebraMap R B r := by
rw [algebraMap_apply, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_tmul]
/-- The `R`-algebra morphism `A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
def includeLeft [SMulCommClass R S A] : A →ₐ[S] A ⊗[R] B :=
{ includeLeftRingHom with commutes' := by simp }
#align algebra.tensor_product.include_left Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeft
@[simp]
theorem includeLeft_apply [SMulCommClass R S A] (a : A) :
(includeLeft : A →ₐ[S] A ⊗[R] B) a = a ⊗ₜ 1 :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.include_left_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeft_apply
/-- The algebra morphism `B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B` sending `b` to `1 ⊗ₜ b`. -/
def includeRight : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B where
toFun b := 1 ⊗ₜ b
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := by simp [tmul_add]
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by simp
commutes' r := by simp only [algebraMap_apply']
#align algebra.tensor_product.include_right Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight
@[simp]
theorem includeRight_apply (b : B) : (includeRight : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B) b = 1 ⊗ₜ b :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.include_right_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight_apply
theorem includeLeftRingHom_comp_algebraMap :
(includeLeftRingHom.comp (algebraMap R A) : R →+* A ⊗[R] B) =
includeRight.toRingHom.comp (algebraMap R B) := by
ext
simp
#align algebra.tensor_product.include_left_comp_algebra_map Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeftRingHom_comp_algebraMapₓ
section ext
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S C] [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S C]
/-- A version of `TensorProduct.ext` for `AlgHom`.
Using this as the `@[ext]` lemma instead of `Algebra.TensorProduct.ext'` allows `ext` to apply
lemmas specific to `A →ₐ[S] _` and `B →ₐ[R] _`; notably this allows recursion into nested tensor
products of algebras.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem ext ⦃f g : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C⦄
(ha : f.comp includeLeft = g.comp includeLeft)
(hb : (f.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight = (g.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight) :
f = g := by
apply AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective
ext a b
have := congr_arg₂ HMul.hMul (AlgHom.congr_fun ha a) (AlgHom.congr_fun hb b)
dsimp at *
rwa [← f.map_mul, ← g.map_mul, tmul_mul_tmul, _root_.one_mul, _root_.mul_one] at this
theorem ext' {g h : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C} (H : ∀ a b, g (a ⊗ₜ b) = h (a ⊗ₜ b)) : g = h :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => H _ _) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => H _ _)
#align algebra.tensor_product.ext Algebra.TensorProduct.ext
end ext
end Semiring
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne A] [Module R A]
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne B] [Module R B]
instance instAddCommGroupWithOne : AddCommGroupWithOne (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instAddCommMonoidWithOne
intCast z := z ⊗ₜ (1 : B)
intCast_ofNat n := by simp [natCast_def]
intCast_negSucc n := by simp [natCast_def, add_tmul, neg_tmul, one_def]
theorem intCast_def (z : ℤ) : (z : A ⊗[R] B) = (z : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) := rfl
end AddCommGroupWithOne
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocRing : NonUnitalNonAssocRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
section NonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonAssocRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonAssocRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonAssocRing : NonAssocRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonAssocSemiring
__ := instAddCommGroupWithOne
end NonAssocRing
section NonUnitalRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonUnitalRing : NonUnitalRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonUnitalSemiring
end NonUnitalRing
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R B]
instance instCommSemiring : CommSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
toSemiring := inferInstance
mul_comm x y := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a₁ b₁
refine TensorProduct.induction_on y ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a₂ b₂
simp [mul_comm]
· intro a₂ b₂ ha hb
simp [mul_add, add_mul, ha, hb]
· intro x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂
simp [mul_add, add_mul, h₁, h₂]
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R]
variable [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
instance instRing : Ring (A ⊗[R] B) where
toSemiring := instSemiring
__ := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonAssocRing
theorem intCast_def' (z : ℤ) : (z : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (z : B) := by
rw [intCast_def, ← zsmul_one, smul_tmul, zsmul_one]
-- verify there are no diamonds
example : (instRing : Ring (A ⊗[R] B)).toAddCommGroup = addCommGroup := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
-- fails at `with_reducible_and_instances rfl` #10906
example : (algebraInt _ : Algebra ℤ (ℤ ⊗[ℤ] B)) = leftAlgebra := rfl
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable [CommRing B] [Algebra R B]
instance instCommRing : CommRing (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ toRing := inferInstance
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section RightAlgebra
/-- `S ⊗[R] T` has a `T`-algebra structure. This is not a global instance or else the action of
`S` on `S ⊗[R] S` would be ambiguous. -/
abbrev rightAlgebra : Algebra B (A ⊗[R] B) :=
(Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight.toRingHom : B →+* A ⊗[R] B).toAlgebra
#align algebra.tensor_product.right_algebra Algebra.TensorProduct.rightAlgebra
attribute [local instance] TensorProduct.rightAlgebra
instance right_isScalarTower : IsScalarTower R B (A ⊗[R] B) :=
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq fun r => (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight.commutes r).symm
#align algebra.tensor_product.right_is_scalar_tower Algebra.TensorProduct.right_isScalarTower
end RightAlgebra
end CommRing
/-- Verify that typeclass search finds the ring structure on `A ⊗[ℤ] B`
when `A` and `B` are merely rings, by treating both as `ℤ`-algebras.
-/
example [Ring A] [Ring B] : Ring (A ⊗[ℤ] B) := by infer_instance
/-- Verify that typeclass search finds the comm_ring structure on `A ⊗[ℤ] B`
when `A` and `B` are merely comm_rings, by treating both as `ℤ`-algebras.
-/
example [CommRing A] [CommRing B] : CommRing (A ⊗[ℤ] B) := by infer_instance
/-!
We now build the structure maps for the symmetric monoidal category of `R`-algebras.
-/
section Monoidal
section
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] [Algebra S C]
variable [Semiring D] [Algebra R D]
/-- Build an algebra morphism from a linear map out of a tensor product, and evidence that on pure
tensors, it preserves multiplication and the identity.
Note that we state `h_one` using `1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1` instead of `1` so that lemmas about `f` applied to pure
tensors can be directly applied by the caller (without needing `TensorProduct.one_def`).
-/
def algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[S] C)
(h_mul : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(h_one : f (1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1) : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C :=
#adaptation_note
/--
After https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4119 we either need to specify
the `(R := S) (A := A ⊗[R] B)` arguments, or use `set_option maxSynthPendingDepth 2 in`.
-/
AlgHom.ofLinearMap f h_one <| (f.map_mul_iff (R := S) (A := A ⊗[R] B)).2 <| by
-- these instances are needed by the statement of `ext`, but not by the current definition.
letI : Algebra R C := RestrictScalars.algebra R S C
letI : IsScalarTower R S C := RestrictScalars.isScalarTower R S C
ext
exact h_mul _ _ _ _
#align algebra.tensor_product.alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product Algebra.TensorProduct.algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct
@[simp]
theorem algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C) x = f x :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct_apply
/-- Build an algebra equivalence from a linear equivalence out of a tensor product, and evidence
that on pure tensors, it preserves multiplication and the identity.
Note that we state `h_one` using `1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1` instead of `1` so that lemmas about `f` applied to pure
tensors can be directly applied by the caller (without needing `TensorProduct.one_def`).
-/
def algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₗ[S] C)
(h_mul : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(h_one : f (1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1) : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[S] C :=
{ algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[S] C) h_mul h_one, f with }
#align algebra.tensor_product.alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_tensor_product Algebra.TensorProduct.algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct
@[simp]
theorem algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[S] C) x = f x :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_tensor_product_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct_apply
/-- Build an algebra equivalence from a linear equivalence out of a triple tensor product,
and evidence of multiplicativity on pure tensors.
-/
def algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct (f : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₗ[R] D)
(h_mul :
∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) (c₁ c₂ : C),
f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂) ⊗ₜ (c₁ * c₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁ ⊗ₜ c₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂ ⊗ₜ c₂))
(h_one : f (((1 : A) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B)) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : C)) = 1) :
(A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] D :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv f h_one <| f.map_mul_iff.2 <| by
ext
exact h_mul _ _ _ _ _ _
#align algebra.tensor_product.alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_triple_tensor_product Algebra.TensorProduct.algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct
@[simp]
theorem algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] D) x = f x :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_triple_tensor_product_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct_apply
section lift
variable [IsScalarTower R S C]
/-- The forward direction of the universal property of tensor products of algebras; any algebra
morphism from the tensor product can be factored as the product of two algebra morphisms that
commute.
See `Algebra.TensorProduct.liftEquiv` for the fact that every morphism factors this way. -/
def lift (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C :=
algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct
(AlgebraTensorModule.lift <|
letI restr : (C →ₗ[S] C) →ₗ[S] _ :=
{ toFun := (·.restrictScalars R)
map_add' := fun f g => LinearMap.ext fun x => rfl
map_smul' := fun c g => LinearMap.ext fun x => rfl }
LinearMap.flip <| (restr ∘ₗ LinearMap.mul S C ∘ₗ f.toLinearMap).flip ∘ₗ g)
(fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ => show f (a₁ * a₂) * g (b₁ * b₂) = f a₁ * g b₁ * (f a₂ * g b₂) by
rw [f.map_mul, g.map_mul, (hfg a₂ b₁).mul_mul_mul_comm])
(show f 1 * g 1 = 1 by rw [f.map_one, g.map_one, one_mul])
@[simp]
theorem lift_tmul (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y))
(a : A) (b : B) :
lift f g hfg (a ⊗ₜ b) = f a * g b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_includeLeft_includeRight :
lift includeLeft includeRight (fun a b => (Commute.one_right _).tmul (Commute.one_left _)) =
.id S (A ⊗[R] B) := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_includeLeft (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
(lift f g hfg).comp includeLeft = f :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_includeRight (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
((lift f g hfg).restrictScalars R).comp includeRight = g :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
/-- The universal property of the tensor product of algebras.
Pairs of algebra morphisms that commute are equivalent to algebra morphisms from the tensor product.
This is `Algebra.TensorProduct.lift` as an equivalence.
See also `GradedTensorProduct.liftEquiv` for an alternative commutativity requirement for graded
algebra. -/
@[simps]
def liftEquiv : {fg : (A →ₐ[S] C) × (B →ₐ[R] C) // ∀ x y, Commute (fg.1 x) (fg.2 y)}
≃ ((A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C) where
toFun fg := lift fg.val.1 fg.val.2 fg.prop
invFun f' := ⟨(f'.comp includeLeft, (f'.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight), fun x y =>
((Commute.one_right _).tmul (Commute.one_left _)).map f'⟩
left_inv fg := by ext <;> simp
right_inv f' := by ext <;> simp
end lift
end
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B] [Algebra S B] [IsScalarTower R S B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] [Algebra S C] [IsScalarTower R S C]
variable [Semiring D] [Algebra R D]
variable [Semiring E] [Algebra R E]
variable [Semiring F] [Algebra R F]
section
variable (R A)
/-- The base ring is a left identity for the tensor product of algebra, up to algebra isomorphism.
-/
protected nonrec def lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (TensorProduct.lid R A) (by
simp only [mul_smul, lid_tmul, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc, Algebra.mul_smul_comm]
simp_rw [← mul_smul, mul_comm]
simp)
(by simp [Algebra.smul_def])
#align algebra.tensor_product.lid Algebra.TensorProduct.lid
@[simp] theorem lid_toLinearEquiv :
(TensorProduct.lid R A).toLinearEquiv = _root_.TensorProduct.lid R A := rfl
variable {R} {A} in
@[simp]
theorem lid_tmul (r : R) (a : A) : TensorProduct.lid R A (r ⊗ₜ a) = r • a := rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.lid_tmul Algebra.TensorProduct.lid_tmul
variable {A} in
@[simp]
theorem lid_symm_apply (a : A) : (TensorProduct.lid R A).symm a = 1 ⊗ₜ a := rfl
variable (S)
/-- The base ring is a right identity for the tensor product of algebra, up to algebra isomorphism.
Note that if `A` is commutative this can be instantiated with `S = A`.
-/
protected nonrec def rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[S] A :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (AlgebraTensorModule.rid R S A)
(fun a₁ a₂ r₁ r₂ => smul_mul_smul r₁ r₂ a₁ a₂ |>.symm)
(one_smul R _)
#align algebra.tensor_product.rid Algebra.TensorProduct.rid
@[simp] theorem rid_toLinearEquiv :
(TensorProduct.rid R S A).toLinearEquiv = AlgebraTensorModule.rid R S A := rfl
variable {R A} in
@[simp]
theorem rid_tmul (r : R) (a : A) : TensorProduct.rid R S A (a ⊗ₜ r) = r • a := rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.rid_tmul Algebra.TensorProduct.rid_tmul
variable {A} in
@[simp]
theorem rid_symm_apply (a : A) : (TensorProduct.rid R S A).symm a = a ⊗ₜ 1 := rfl
section
variable (B)
/-- The tensor product of R-algebras is commutative, up to algebra isomorphism.
-/
protected def comm : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (_root_.TensorProduct.comm R A B) (fun _ _ _ _ => rfl) rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.comm Algebra.TensorProduct.comm
@[simp] theorem comm_toLinearEquiv :
(Algebra.TensorProduct.comm R A B).toLinearEquiv = _root_.TensorProduct.comm R A B := rfl
variable {A B} in
@[simp]
theorem comm_tmul (a : A) (b : B) :
TensorProduct.comm R A B (a ⊗ₜ b) = b ⊗ₜ a :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.comm_tmul Algebra.TensorProduct.comm_tmul
variable {A B} in
@[simp]
theorem comm_symm_tmul (a : A) (b : B) :
(TensorProduct.comm R A B).symm (b ⊗ₜ a) = a ⊗ₜ b :=
rfl
theorem comm_symm :
(TensorProduct.comm R A B).symm = TensorProduct.comm R B A := by
ext; rfl
theorem adjoin_tmul_eq_top : adjoin R { t : A ⊗[R] B | ∃ a b, a ⊗ₜ[R] b = t } = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp <| (top_le_iff.mpr <| span_tmul_eq_top R A B).trans (span_le_adjoin R _)
#align algebra.tensor_product.adjoin_tmul_eq_top Algebra.TensorProduct.adjoin_tmul_eq_top
end
section
variable {R A}
theorem assoc_aux_1 (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) (c₁ c₂ : C) :
(TensorProduct.assoc R A B C) (((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂)) ⊗ₜ[R] (c₁ * c₂)) =
(TensorProduct.assoc R A B C) ((a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) ⊗ₜ[R] c₁) *
(TensorProduct.assoc R A B C) ((a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) ⊗ₜ[R] c₂) :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.assoc_aux_1 Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc_aux_1
theorem assoc_aux_2 : (TensorProduct.assoc R A B C) ((1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1 :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.assoc_aux_2 Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc_aux_2ₓ
variable (R A B C)
-- Porting note: much nicer than Lean 3 proof
/-- The associator for tensor product of R-algebras, as an algebra isomorphism. -/
protected def assoc : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B ⊗[R] C :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct
(_root_.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C)
Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc_aux_1
Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc_aux_2
#align algebra.tensor_product.assoc Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc
@[simp] theorem assoc_toLinearEquiv :
(Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C).toLinearEquiv = _root_.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C := rfl
variable {A B C}
@[simp]
theorem assoc_tmul (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) :
Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C ((a ⊗ₜ b) ⊗ₜ c) = a ⊗ₜ (b ⊗ₜ c) :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.assoc_tmul Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc_tmul
@[simp]
theorem assoc_symm_tmul (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) :
(Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C).symm (a ⊗ₜ (b ⊗ₜ c)) = (a ⊗ₜ b) ⊗ₜ c :=
rfl
end
variable {R S A}
/-- The tensor product of a pair of algebra morphisms. -/
def map (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) : A ⊗[R] C →ₐ[S] B ⊗[R] D :=
algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (AlgebraTensorModule.map f.toLinearMap g.toLinearMap) (by simp)
(by simp [one_def])
#align algebra.tensor_product.map Algebra.TensorProduct.map
@[simp]
theorem map_tmul (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) (a : A) (c : C) : map f g (a ⊗ₜ c) = f a ⊗ₜ g c :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.map_tmul Algebra.TensorProduct.map_tmul
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (.id S A) (.id R C) = .id S _ :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl)
theorem map_comp (f₂ : B →ₐ[S] C) (f₁ : A →ₐ[S] B) (g₂ : E →ₐ[R] F) (g₁ : D →ₐ[R] E) :
map (f₂.comp f₁) (g₂.comp g₁) = (map f₂ g₂).comp (map f₁ g₁) :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_includeLeft (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).comp includeLeft = includeLeft.comp f :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
#align algebra.tensor_product.map_comp_include_left Algebra.TensorProduct.map_comp_includeLeft
@[simp]
theorem map_restrictScalars_comp_includeRight (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) :
((map f g).restrictScalars R).comp includeRight = includeRight.comp g :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_includeRight (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).comp includeRight = includeRight.comp g :=
map_restrictScalars_comp_includeRight f g
#align algebra.tensor_product.map_comp_include_right Algebra.TensorProduct.map_comp_includeRight
theorem map_range (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).range = (includeLeft.comp f).range ⊔ (includeRight.comp g).range := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← map_top, ← adjoin_tmul_eq_top, ← adjoin_image, adjoin_le_iff]
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
rw [map_tmul, ← _root_.mul_one (f a), ← _root_.one_mul (g b), ← tmul_mul_tmul]
exact mul_mem_sup (AlgHom.mem_range_self _ a) (AlgHom.mem_range_self _ b)
· rw [← map_comp_includeLeft f g, ← map_comp_includeRight f g]
exact sup_le (AlgHom.range_comp_le_range _ _) (AlgHom.range_comp_le_range _ _)
#align algebra.tensor_product.map_range Algebra.TensorProduct.map_range
/-- Construct an isomorphism between tensor products of an S-algebra with an R-algebra
from S- and R- isomorphisms between the tensor factors.
-/
def congr (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) (g : C ≃ₐ[R] D) : A ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[S] B ⊗[R] D :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (map f g) (map f.symm g.symm)
(ext' fun b d => by simp) (ext' fun a c => by simp)
#align algebra.tensor_product.congr Algebra.TensorProduct.congr
@[simp] theorem congr_toLinearEquiv (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) (g : C ≃ₐ[R] D) :
(Algebra.TensorProduct.congr f g).toLinearEquiv =
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.congr f.toLinearEquiv g.toLinearEquiv := rfl
@[simp]
theorem congr_apply (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) (g : C ≃ₐ[R] D) (x) :
congr f g x = (map (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D)) x :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.congr_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.congr_apply
@[simp]
theorem congr_symm_apply (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) (g : C ≃ₐ[R] D) (x) :
(congr f g).symm x = (map (f.symm : B →ₐ[S] A) (g.symm : D →ₐ[R] C)) x :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.congr_symm_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.congr_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem congr_refl : congr (.refl : A ≃ₐ[S] A) (.refl : C ≃ₐ[R] C) = .refl :=
AlgEquiv.coe_algHom_injective <| map_id
theorem congr_trans (f₁ : A ≃ₐ[S] B) (f₂ : B ≃ₐ[S] C) (g₁ : D ≃ₐ[R] E) (g₂ : E ≃ₐ[R] F) :
congr (f₁.trans f₂) (g₁.trans g₂) = (congr f₁ g₁).trans (congr f₂ g₂) :=
AlgEquiv.coe_algHom_injective <| map_comp f₂.toAlgHom f₁.toAlgHom g₂.toAlgHom g₁.toAlgHom
theorem congr_symm (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) (g : C ≃ₐ[R] D) : congr f.symm g.symm = (congr f g).symm := rfl
end
end Monoidal
section
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [CommSemiring C] [Algebra R C] [Algebra S C] [IsScalarTower R S C]
/-- If `A`, `B`, `C` are `R`-algebras, `A` and `C` are also `S`-algebras (forming a tower as
`·/S/R`), then the product map of `f : A →ₐ[S] C` and `g : B →ₐ[R] C` is an `S`-algebra
homomorphism.
This is just a special case of `Algebra.TensorProduct.lift` for when `C` is commutative. -/
abbrev productLeftAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C :=
lift f g (fun _ _ => Commute.all _ _)
#align algebra.tensor_product.product_left_alg_hom Algebra.TensorProduct.productLeftAlgHom
end
section
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [CommSemiring S]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra R S]
variable (f : A →ₐ[R] S) (g : B →ₐ[R] S)
variable (R)
/-- `LinearMap.mul'` is an `AlgHom` on commutative rings. -/
def lmul' : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S :=
algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (LinearMap.mul' R S)
(fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ => by simp only [LinearMap.mul'_apply, mul_mul_mul_comm]) <| by
simp only [LinearMap.mul'_apply, _root_.mul_one]
#align algebra.tensor_product.lmul' Algebra.TensorProduct.lmul'
variable {R}
theorem lmul'_toLinearMap : (lmul' R : _ →ₐ[R] S).toLinearMap = LinearMap.mul' R S :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.lmul'_to_linear_map Algebra.TensorProduct.lmul'_toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem lmul'_apply_tmul (a b : S) : lmul' (S := S) R (a ⊗ₜ[R] b) = a * b :=
rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.lmul'_apply_tmul Algebra.TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul
@[simp]
theorem lmul'_comp_includeLeft : (lmul' R : _ →ₐ[R] S).comp includeLeft = AlgHom.id R S :=
AlgHom.ext <| _root_.mul_one
#align algebra.tensor_product.lmul'_comp_include_left Algebra.TensorProduct.lmul'_comp_includeLeft
@[simp]
theorem lmul'_comp_includeRight : (lmul' R : _ →ₐ[R] S).comp includeRight = AlgHom.id R S :=
AlgHom.ext <| _root_.one_mul
#align algebra.tensor_product.lmul'_comp_include_right Algebra.TensorProduct.lmul'_comp_includeRight
/-- If `S` is commutative, for a pair of morphisms `f : A →ₐ[R] S`, `g : B →ₐ[R] S`,
We obtain a map `A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[R] S` that commutes with `f`, `g` via `a ⊗ b ↦ f(a) * g(b)`.
This is a special case of `Algebra.TensorProduct.productLeftAlgHom` for when the two base rings are
the same.
-/
def productMap : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[R] S := productLeftAlgHom f g
#align algebra.tensor_product.product_map Algebra.TensorProduct.productMap
theorem productMap_eq_comp_map : productMap f g = (lmul' R).comp (TensorProduct.map f g) := by
ext <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem productMap_apply_tmul (a : A) (b : B) : productMap f g (a ⊗ₜ b) = f a * g b := rfl
#align algebra.tensor_product.product_map_apply_tmul Algebra.TensorProduct.productMap_apply_tmul
theorem productMap_left_apply (a : A) : productMap f g (a ⊗ₜ 1) = f a := by
simp
#align algebra.tensor_product.product_map_left_apply Algebra.TensorProduct.productMap_left_apply
@[simp]
theorem productMap_left : (productMap f g).comp includeLeft = f :=
lift_comp_includeLeft _ _ (fun _ _ => Commute.all _ _)
#align algebra.tensor_product.product_map_left Algebra.TensorProduct.productMap_left
| Mathlib/RingTheory/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 1,031 | 1,032 | theorem productMap_right_apply (b : B) :
productMap f g (1 ⊗ₜ b) = g b := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.PiLex
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.fin.tuple.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ef997baa41b5c428be3fb50089a7139bf4ee886b"
/-!
# Operation on tuples
We interpret maps `∀ i : Fin n, α i` as `n`-tuples of elements of possibly varying type `α i`,
`(α 0, …, α (n-1))`. A particular case is `Fin n → α` of elements with all the same type.
In this case when `α i` is a constant map, then tuples are isomorphic (but not definitionally equal)
to `Vector`s.
We define the following operations:
* `Fin.tail` : the tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries;
* `Fin.cons` : adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple;
* `Fin.init` : the beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries;
* `Fin.snoc` : adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc`
comes from `cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order.
* `Fin.insertNth` : insert an element to a tuple at a given position.
* `Fin.find p` : returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied.
* `Fin.append a b` : append two tuples.
* `Fin.repeat n a` : repeat a tuple `n` times.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
/-- There is exactly one tuple of size zero. -/
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
#align fin.tuple0_le Fin.tuple0_le
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
/-- The tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries. -/
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
#align fin.tail Fin.tail
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
#align fin.tail_def Fin.tail_def
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. -/
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
#align fin.cons Fin.cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [tail, cons]
#align fin.tail_cons Fin.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
#align fin.cons_succ Fin.cons_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by simp [cons]
#align fin.cons_zero Fin.cons_zero
@[simp]
theorem cons_one {α : Fin (n + 2) → Type*} (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i.succ) :
cons x p 1 = p 0 := by
rw [← cons_succ x p]; rfl
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp [Ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)]
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j' = i
· rw [h']
simp
· have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ := by rwa [Ne, succ_inj]
rw [update_noteq h', update_noteq this, cons_succ]
#align fin.cons_update Fin.cons_update
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.cons` is injective. -/
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@cons n α) := fun x₀ y₀ x y h ↦
⟨congr_fun h 0, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (Fin.succ i)⟩
#align fin.cons_injective2 Fin.cons_injective2
@[simp]
theorem cons_eq_cons {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x = cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ = y₀ ∧ x = y :=
cons_injective2.eq_iff
#align fin.cons_eq_cons Fin.cons_eq_cons
theorem cons_left_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : Function.Injective fun x₀ ↦ cons x₀ x :=
cons_injective2.left _
#align fin.cons_left_injective Fin.cons_left_injective
theorem cons_right_injective (x₀ : α 0) : Function.Injective (cons x₀) :=
cons_injective2.right _
#align fin.cons_right_injective Fin.cons_right_injective
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_cons_zero : update (cons x p) 0 z = cons z p := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· simp only [h, update_noteq, Ne, not_false_iff]
let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, cons_succ]
#align fin.update_cons_zero Fin.update_cons_zero
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims LHS doesn't simplify
theorem cons_self_tail : cons (q 0) (tail q) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this]
unfold tail
rw [cons_succ]
#align fin.cons_self_tail Fin.cons_self_tail
-- Porting note: Mathport removes `_root_`?
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it into a single element and an `n`-tuple. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [cons_self_tail]) <| h (x 0) (tail x)
#align fin.cons_cases Fin.consCases
@[simp]
theorem consCases_cons {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x₀ : α 0) (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : @consCases _ _ _ h (cons x₀ x) = h x₀ x := by
rw [consCases, cast_eq]
congr
#align fin.cons_cases_cons Fin.consCases_cons
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.cons`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consInduction {α : Type*} {P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort v} (h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x₀) (x : Fin n → α), P x → P (Fin.cons x₀ x)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| n + 1, x => consCases (fun x₀ x ↦ h _ _ <| consInduction h0 h _) x
#align fin.cons_induction Fin.consInductionₓ -- Porting note: universes
theorem cons_injective_of_injective {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} (hx₀ : x₀ ∉ Set.range x)
(hx : Function.Injective x) : Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro
rfl
· intro j h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h.symm⟩
· intro i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h⟩
· intro j h
rw [cons_succ, cons_succ] at h
exact congr_arg _ (hx h)
#align fin.cons_injective_of_injective Fin.cons_injective_of_injective
theorem cons_injective_iff {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} :
Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) ↔ x₀ ∉ Set.range x ∧ Function.Injective x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ cons_injective_of_injective h.1 h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
replace h := @h i.succ 0
simp [hi, succ_ne_zero] at h
· simpa [Function.comp] using h.comp (Fin.succ_injective _)
#align fin.cons_injective_iff Fin.cons_injective_iff
@[simp]
theorem forall_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∀ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun h ↦ h _, fun h x ↦ Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim x ▸ h⟩
#align fin.forall_fin_zero_pi Fin.forall_fin_zero_pi
@[simp]
theorem exists_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∃ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ Subsingleton.elim x finZeroElim ▸ h, fun h ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align fin.exists_fin_zero_pi Fin.exists_fin_zero_pi
theorem forall_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun h a v ↦ h (Fin.cons a v), consCases⟩
#align fin.forall_fin_succ_pi Fin.forall_fin_succ_pi
theorem exists_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x 0, tail x, (cons_self_tail x).symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align fin.exists_fin_succ_pi Fin.exists_fin_succ_pi
/-- Updating the first element of a tuple does not change the tail. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_zero : tail (update q 0 z) = tail q := by
ext j
simp [tail, Fin.succ_ne_zero]
#align fin.tail_update_zero Fin.tail_update_zero
/-- Updating a nonzero element and taking the tail commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_succ : tail (update q i.succ y) = update (tail q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [tail]
· simp [tail, (Fin.succ_injective n).ne h, h]
#align fin.tail_update_succ Fin.tail_update_succ
theorem comp_cons {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (y : α) (q : Fin n → α) :
g ∘ cons y q = cons (g y) (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
rfl
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, comp_apply, comp_apply, cons_succ]
#align fin.comp_cons Fin.comp_cons
theorem comp_tail {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ tail q = tail (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [tail]
#align fin.comp_tail Fin.comp_tail
theorem le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
q ≤ cons x p ↔ q 0 ≤ x ∧ tail q ≤ p :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| forall_congr' fun j ↦ by simp [tail]
#align fin.le_cons Fin.le_cons
theorem cons_le [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q 0 ∧ p ≤ tail q :=
@le_cons _ (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x q p
#align fin.cons_le Fin.cons_le
theorem cons_le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x ≤ cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ ≤ y₀ ∧ x ≤ y :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr_right' <| by simp only [cons_succ, Pi.le_def]
#align fin.cons_le_cons Fin.cons_le_cons
theorem pi_lex_lt_cons_cons {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ}
(s : ∀ {i : Fin n.succ}, α i → α i → Prop) :
Pi.Lex (· < ·) (@s) (Fin.cons x₀ x) (Fin.cons y₀ y) ↔
s x₀ y₀ ∨ x₀ = y₀ ∧ Pi.Lex (· < ·) (@fun i : Fin n ↦ @s i.succ) x y := by
simp_rw [Pi.Lex, Fin.exists_fin_succ, Fin.cons_succ, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.forall_fin_succ]
simp [and_assoc, exists_and_left]
#align fin.pi_lex_lt_cons_cons Fin.pi_lex_lt_cons_cons
theorem range_fin_succ {α} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
Set.range f = insert (f 0) (Set.range (Fin.tail f)) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ exists_fin_succ.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
#align fin.range_fin_succ Fin.range_fin_succ
@[simp]
theorem range_cons {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (x : α) (b : Fin n → α) :
Set.range (Fin.cons x b : Fin n.succ → α) = insert x (Set.range b) := by
rw [range_fin_succ, cons_zero, tail_cons]
#align fin.range_cons Fin.range_cons
section Append
/-- Append a tuple of length `m` to a tuple of length `n` to get a tuple of length `m + n`.
This is a non-dependent version of `Fin.add_cases`. -/
def append {α : Type*} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) : Fin (m + n) → α :=
@Fin.addCases _ _ (fun _ => α) a b
#align fin.append Fin.append
@[simp]
theorem append_left {α : Type*} (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin m) :
append u v (Fin.castAdd n i) = u i :=
addCases_left _
#align fin.append_left Fin.append_left
@[simp]
theorem append_right {α : Type*} (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin n) :
append u v (natAdd m i) = v i :=
addCases_right _
#align fin.append_right Fin.append_right
theorem append_right_nil {α : Type*} (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hv : n = 0) :
append u v = u ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hv, Nat.add_zero]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· rw [append_left, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg u (Fin.ext ?_)
simp
· exact (Fin.cast hv r).elim0
#align fin.append_right_nil Fin.append_right_nil
@[simp]
theorem append_elim0 {α : Type*} (u : Fin m → α) :
append u Fin.elim0 = u ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_zero _) :=
append_right_nil _ _ rfl
#align fin.append_elim0 Fin.append_elim0
theorem append_left_nil {α : Type*} (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hu : m = 0) :
append u v = v ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hu, Nat.zero_add]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· exact (Fin.cast hu l).elim0
· rw [append_right, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg v (Fin.ext ?_)
simp [hu]
#align fin.append_left_nil Fin.append_left_nil
@[simp]
theorem elim0_append {α : Type*} (v : Fin n → α) :
append Fin.elim0 v = v ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_add _) :=
append_left_nil _ _ rfl
#align fin.elim0_append Fin.elim0_append
theorem append_assoc {p : ℕ} {α : Type*} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) (c : Fin p → α) :
append (append a b) c = append a (append b c) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_assoc ..) := by
ext i
rw [Function.comp_apply]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) (fun r => ?_) i
· rw [append_left]
refine Fin.addCases (fun ll => ?_) (fun lr => ?_) l
· rw [append_left]
simp [castAdd_castAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [castAdd_natAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [← natAdd_natAdd]
#align fin.append_assoc Fin.append_assoc
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the left is the same as `Fin.cons`. -/
theorem append_left_eq_cons {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) (x : Fin n → α) :
Fin.append x₀ x = Fin.cons (x₀ 0) x ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_left, Function.comp_apply, eq_comm]
exact Fin.cons_zero _ _
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_right, Function.comp_apply, Fin.cast_natAdd, eq_comm, Fin.addNat_one]
exact Fin.cons_succ _ _ _
#align fin.append_left_eq_cons Fin.append_left_eq_cons
/-- `Fin.cons` is the same as appending a one-tuple to the left. -/
theorem cons_eq_append {α : Type*} (x : α) (xs : Fin n → α) :
cons x xs = append (cons x Fin.elim0) xs ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
funext i; simp [append_left_eq_cons]
@[simp] lemma append_cast_left {n m} {α : Type*} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (n' : ℕ)
(h : n' = n) :
Fin.append (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) ys = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
@[simp] lemma append_cast_right {n m} {α : Type*} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (m' : ℕ)
(h : m' = m) :
Fin.append xs (ys ∘ Fin.cast h) = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
lemma append_rev {m n} {α : Type*} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m + n)) :
append xs ys (rev i) = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) (cast (Nat.add_comm ..) i) := by
rcases rev_surjective i with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rw [rev_rev]
induction i using Fin.addCases
· simp [rev_castAdd]
· simp [cast_rev, rev_addNat]
lemma append_comp_rev {m n} {α : Type*} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) :
append xs ys ∘ rev = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) ∘ cast (Nat.add_comm ..) :=
funext <| append_rev xs ys
end Append
section Repeat
/-- Repeat `a` `m` times. For example `Fin.repeat 2 ![0, 3, 7] = ![0, 3, 7, 0, 3, 7]`. -/
-- Porting note: removed @[simp]
def «repeat» {α : Type*} (m : ℕ) (a : Fin n → α) : Fin (m * n) → α
| i => a i.modNat
#align fin.repeat Fin.repeat
-- Porting note: added (leanprover/lean4#2042)
@[simp]
theorem repeat_apply {α : Type*} (a : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a i = a i.modNat :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem repeat_zero {α : Type*} (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat 0 a = Fin.elim0 ∘ cast (Nat.zero_mul _) :=
funext fun x => (cast (Nat.zero_mul _) x).elim0
#align fin.repeat_zero Fin.repeat_zero
@[simp]
theorem repeat_one {α : Type*} (a : Fin n → α) : Fin.repeat 1 a = a ∘ cast (Nat.one_mul _) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
intro i
simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt i.is_lt]
#align fin.repeat_one Fin.repeat_one
theorem repeat_succ {α : Type*} (a : Fin n → α) (m : ℕ) :
Fin.repeat m.succ a =
append a (Fin.repeat m a) ∘ cast ((Nat.succ_mul _ _).trans (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat]
#align fin.repeat_succ Fin.repeat_succ
@[simp]
theorem repeat_add {α : Type*} (a : Fin n → α) (m₁ m₂ : ℕ) : Fin.repeat (m₁ + m₂) a =
append (Fin.repeat m₁ a) (Fin.repeat m₂ a) ∘ cast (Nat.add_mul ..) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat, Nat.add_mod]
#align fin.repeat_add Fin.repeat_add
theorem repeat_rev {α : Type*} (a : Fin n → α) (k : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a k.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) k :=
congr_arg a k.modNat_rev
theorem repeat_comp_rev {α} (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat m a ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) :=
funext <| repeat_rev a
end Repeat
end Tuple
section TupleRight
/-! In the previous section, we have discussed inserting or removing elements on the left of a
tuple. In this section, we do the same on the right. A difference is that `Fin (n+1)` is constructed
inductively from `Fin n` starting from the left, not from the right. This implies that Lean needs
more help to realize that elements belong to the right types, i.e., we need to insert casts at
several places. -/
-- Porting note: `i.castSucc` does not work like it did in Lean 3;
-- `(castSucc i)` must be used.
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} (x : α (last n)) (q : ∀ i, α i)
(p : ∀ i : Fin n, α (castSucc i)) (i : Fin n) (y : α (castSucc i)) (z : α (last n))
/-- The beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries -/
def init (q : ∀ i, α i) (i : Fin n) : α (castSucc i) :=
q (castSucc i)
#align fin.init Fin.init
theorem init_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(init fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q (castSucc k) :=
rfl
#align fin.init_def Fin.init_def
/-- Adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc` comes from
`cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order. -/
def snoc (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α (castSucc i)) (x : α (last n)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : α i :=
if h : i.val < n then _root_.cast (by rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT i h]) (p (castLT i h))
else _root_.cast (by rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]) x
#align fin.snoc Fin.snoc
@[simp]
theorem init_snoc : init (snoc p x) = p := by
ext i
simp only [init, snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
#align fin.init_snoc Fin.init_snoc
@[simp]
theorem snoc_castSucc : snoc p x (castSucc i) = p i := by
simp only [snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
#align fin.snoc_cast_succ Fin.snoc_castSucc
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_castSucc {n : ℕ} {α : Sort _} {a : α} {f : Fin n → α} :
(snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α) ∘ castSucc = f :=
funext fun i ↦ by rw [Function.comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
#align fin.snoc_comp_cast_succ Fin.snoc_comp_castSucc
@[simp]
theorem snoc_last : snoc p x (last n) = x := by simp [snoc]
#align fin.snoc_last Fin.snoc_last
lemma snoc_zero {α : Type*} (p : Fin 0 → α) (x : α) :
Fin.snoc p x = fun _ ↦ x := by
ext y
have : Subsingleton (Fin (0 + 1)) := Fin.subsingleton_one
simp only [Subsingleton.elim y (Fin.last 0), snoc_last]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_nat_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort _} (f : Fin (m + n) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ (natAdd m : Fin (n + 1) → Fin (m + n + 1)) =
snoc (f ∘ natAdd m) a := by
ext i
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i ↦ ?_) i
· simp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [snoc_last, natAdd_last, snoc_last]
· simp only [comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
rw [natAdd_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
#align fin.snoc_comp_nat_add Fin.snoc_comp_nat_add
@[simp]
theorem snoc_cast_add {α : Fin (n + m + 1) → Type*} (f : ∀ i : Fin (n + m), α (castSucc i))
(a : α (last (n + m))) (i : Fin n) : (snoc f a) (castAdd (m + 1) i) = f (castAdd m i) :=
dif_pos _
#align fin.snoc_cast_add Fin.snoc_cast_add
-- Porting note: Had to `unfold comp`
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_cast_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort _} (f : Fin (n + m) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ castAdd (m + 1) = f ∘ castAdd m :=
funext (by unfold comp; exact snoc_cast_add _ _)
#align fin.snoc_comp_cast_add Fin.snoc_comp_cast_add
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the end commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_update : snoc (update p i y) x = update (snoc p x) (castSucc i) y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· rw [snoc]
simp only [h]
simp only [dif_pos]
by_cases h' : j = castSucc i
· have C1 : α (castSucc i) = α j := by rw [h']
have E1 : update (snoc p x) (castSucc i) y j = _root_.cast C1 y := by
have : update (snoc p x) j (_root_.cast C1 y) j = _root_.cast C1 y := by simp
convert this
· exact h'.symm
· exact heq_of_cast_eq (congr_arg α (Eq.symm h')) rfl
have C2 : α (castSucc i) = α (castSucc (castLT j h)) := by rw [castSucc_castLT, h']
have E2 : update p i y (castLT j h) = _root_.cast C2 y := by
have : update p (castLT j h) (_root_.cast C2 y) (castLT j h) = _root_.cast C2 y := by simp
convert this
· simp [h, h']
· exact heq_of_cast_eq C2 rfl
rw [E1, E2]
exact eq_rec_compose (Eq.trans C2.symm C1) C2 y
· have : ¬castLT j h = i := by
intro E
apply h'
rw [← E, castSucc_castLT]
simp [h', this, snoc, h]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp [Ne.symm (ne_of_lt (castSucc_lt_last i))]
#align fin.snoc_update Fin.snoc_update
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_snoc_last : update (snoc p x) (last n) z = snoc p z := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· have : j ≠ last n := ne_of_lt h
simp [h, update_noteq, this, snoc]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
#align fin.update_snoc_last Fin.update_snoc_last
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_init_self : snoc (init q) (q (last n)) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp only [init, snoc, h, cast_eq, dite_true, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
#align fin.snoc_init_self Fin.snoc_init_self
/-- Updating the last element of a tuple does not change the beginning. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_last : init (update q (last n) z) = init q := by
ext j
simp [init, ne_of_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
#align fin.init_update_last Fin.init_update_last
/-- Updating an element and taking the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_castSucc : init (update q (castSucc i) y) = update (init q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [init]
· simp [init, h, castSucc_inj]
#align fin.init_update_cast_succ Fin.init_update_castSucc
/-- `tail` and `init` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem tail_init_eq_init_tail {β : Type*} (q : Fin (n + 2) → β) :
tail (init q) = init (tail q) := by
ext i
simp [tail, init, castSucc_fin_succ]
#align fin.tail_init_eq_init_tail Fin.tail_init_eq_init_tail
/-- `cons` and `snoc` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons {β : Type*} (a : β) (q : Fin n → β) (b : β) :
@cons n.succ (fun _ ↦ β) a (snoc q b) = snoc (cons a q) b := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = 0
· rw [h]
-- Porting note: `refl` finished it here in Lean 3, but I had to add more.
simp [snoc, castLT]
set j := pred i h with ji
have : i = j.succ := by rw [ji, succ_pred]
rw [this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j.val < n
· set k := castLT j h' with jk
have : j = castSucc k := by rw [jk, castSucc_castLT]
rw [this, ← castSucc_fin_succ, snoc]
simp [pred, snoc, cons]
rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h', succ_last]
simp
#align fin.cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons Fin.cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons
theorem comp_snoc {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n → α) (y : α) :
g ∘ snoc q y = snoc (g ∘ q) (g y) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp [h, snoc, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
#align fin.comp_snoc Fin.comp_snoc
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the right is the same as `Fin.snoc`. -/
theorem append_right_eq_snoc {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α) (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) :
Fin.append x x₀ = Fin.snoc x (x₀ 0) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_left]
exact (@snoc_castSucc _ (fun _ => α) _ _ i).symm
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_right]
exact (@snoc_last _ (fun _ => α) _ _).symm
#align fin.append_right_eq_snoc Fin.append_right_eq_snoc
/-- `Fin.snoc` is the same as appending a one-tuple -/
theorem snoc_eq_append {α : Type*} (xs : Fin n → α) (x : α) :
snoc xs x = append xs (cons x Fin.elim0) :=
(append_right_eq_snoc xs (cons x Fin.elim0)).symm
theorem append_left_snoc {n m} {α : Type*} (xs : Fin n → α) (x : α) (ys : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append (Fin.snoc xs x) ys =
Fin.append xs (Fin.cons x ys) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ ..) := by
rw [snoc_eq_append, append_assoc, append_left_eq_cons, append_cast_right]; rfl
theorem append_right_cons {n m} {α : Type*} (xs : Fin n → α) (y : α) (ys : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append xs (Fin.cons y ys) =
Fin.append (Fin.snoc xs y) ys ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ ..).symm := by
rw [append_left_snoc]; rfl
theorem append_cons {α} (a : α) (as : Fin n → α) (bs : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append (cons a as) bs
= cons a (Fin.append as bs) ∘ (Fin.cast <| Nat.add_right_comm n 1 m) := by
funext i
rcases i with ⟨i, -⟩
simp only [append, addCases, cons, castLT, cast, comp_apply]
cases' i with i
· simp
· split_ifs with h
· have : i < n := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [addCases, this]
· have : ¬i < n := Nat.not_le.mpr <| Nat.lt_succ.mp <| Nat.not_le.mp h
simp [addCases, this]
theorem append_snoc {α} (as : Fin n → α) (bs : Fin m → α) (b : α) :
Fin.append as (snoc bs b) = snoc (Fin.append as bs) b := by
funext i
rcases i with ⟨i, isLt⟩
simp only [append, addCases, castLT, cast_mk, subNat_mk, natAdd_mk, cast, ge_iff_le, snoc.eq_1,
cast_eq, eq_rec_constant, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, castLT_mk]
split_ifs with lt_n lt_add sub_lt nlt_add lt_add <;> (try rfl)
· have := Nat.lt_add_right m lt_n
contradiction
· obtain rfl := Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (Nat.not_lt.mp nlt_add) isLt
simp [Nat.add_comm n m] at sub_lt
· have := Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add (Nat.not_lt.mp lt_n) lt_add
contradiction
theorem comp_init {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ init q = init (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [init]
#align fin.comp_init Fin.comp_init
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it its initial `n`-tuple and its last element. -/
@[elab_as_elim, inline]
def snocCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort*}
(h : ∀ xs x, P (Fin.snoc xs x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [Fin.snoc_init_self]) <| h (Fin.init x) (x <| Fin.last _)
@[simp] lemma snocCases_snoc
{P : (∀ i : Fin (n+1), α i) → Sort*} (h : ∀ x x₀, P (Fin.snoc x x₀))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n, (Fin.init α) i) (x₀ : α (Fin.last _)) :
snocCases h (Fin.snoc x x₀) = h x x₀ := by
rw [snocCases, cast_eq_iff_heq, Fin.init_snoc, Fin.snoc_last]
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.snoc`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def snocInduction {α : Type*}
{P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort*}
(h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x : Fin n → α) (x₀), P x → P (Fin.snoc x x₀)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| n + 1, x => snocCases (fun x₀ x ↦ h _ _ <| snocInduction h0 h _) x
end TupleRight
section InsertNth
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} {β : Type v}
/- Porting note: Lean told me `(fun x x_1 ↦ α x)` was an invalid motive, but disabling
automatic insertion and specifying that motive seems to work. -/
/-- Define a function on `Fin (n + 1)` from a value on `i : Fin (n + 1)` and values on each
`Fin.succAbove i j`, `j : Fin n`. This version is elaborated as eliminator and works for
propositions, see also `Fin.insertNth` for a version without an `@[elab_as_elim]`
attribute. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def succAboveCases {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (i.succAbove j)) (j : Fin (n + 1)) : α j :=
if hj : j = i then Eq.rec x hj.symm
else
if hlt : j < i then @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _ (succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hlt) (p _)
else @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _ (succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ <|
(Ne.lt_or_lt hj).resolve_left hlt) (p _)
#align fin.succ_above_cases Fin.succAboveCases
theorem forall_iff_succAbove {p : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∀ j, p j) ↔ p i ∧ ∀ j, p (i.succAbove j) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h _, fun _ ↦ h _⟩, fun h ↦ succAboveCases i h.1 h.2⟩
#align fin.forall_iff_succ_above Fin.forall_iff_succAbove
/-- Insert an element into a tuple at a given position. For `i = 0` see `Fin.cons`,
for `i = Fin.last n` see `Fin.snoc`. See also `Fin.succAboveCases` for a version elaborated
as an eliminator. -/
def insertNth (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (i.succAbove j)) (j : Fin (n + 1)) :
α j :=
succAboveCases i x p j
#align fin.insert_nth Fin.insertNth
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_apply_same (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)) :
insertNth i x p i = x := by simp [insertNth, succAboveCases]
#align fin.insert_nth_apply_same Fin.insertNth_apply_same
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 779 | 790 | theorem insertNth_apply_succAbove (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j))
(j : Fin n) : insertNth i x p (i.succAbove j) = p j := by |
simp only [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg (succAbove_ne _ _), succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt]
split_ifs with hlt
· generalize_proofs H₁ H₂; revert H₂
generalize hk : castPred ((succAbove i) j) H₁ = k
rw [castPred_succAbove _ _ hlt] at hk; cases hk
intro; rfl
· generalize_proofs H₁ H₂; revert H₂
generalize hk : pred (succAbove i j) H₁ = k
erw [pred_succAbove _ _ (le_of_not_lt hlt)] at hk; cases hk
intro; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import order.filter.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
## Main definitions
* `Filter` : filters on a set;
* `Filter.principal` : filter of all sets containing a given set;
* `Filter.map`, `Filter.comap` : operations on filters;
* `Filter.Tendsto` : limit with respect to filters;
* `Filter.Eventually` : `f.eventually p` means `{x | p x} ∈ f`;
* `Filter.Frequently` : `f.frequently p` means `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`;
* `filter_upwards [h₁, ..., hₙ]` :
a tactic that takes a list of proofs `hᵢ : sᵢ ∈ f`,
and replaces a goal `s ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ s₁ → ... → x ∈ sₙ → x ∈ s`;
* `Filter.NeBot f` : a utility class stating that `f` is a non-trivial filter.
Filters on a type `X` are sets of sets of `X` satisfying three conditions. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
In this file, we define the type `Filter X` of filters on `X`, and endow it with a complete lattice
structure. This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The general notion of limit of a map with respect to filters on the source and target types
is `Filter.Tendsto`. It is defined in terms of the order and the push-forward operation.
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
For instance, anticipating on Topology.Basic, the statement: "if a sequence `u` converges to
some `x` and `u n` belongs to a set `M` for `n` large enough then `x` is in the closure of
`M`" is formalized as: `Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) → (∀ᶠ n in atTop, u n ∈ M) → x ∈ closure M`,
which is a special case of `mem_closure_of_tendsto` from Topology.Basic.
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set Order
open scoped Classical
universe u v w x y
/-- A filter `F` on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. We do not forbid this collection to be
all sets of `α`. -/
structure Filter (α : Type*) where
/-- The set of sets that belong to the filter. -/
sets : Set (Set α)
/-- The set `Set.univ` belongs to any filter. -/
univ_sets : Set.univ ∈ sets
/-- If a set belongs to a filter, then its superset belongs to the filter as well. -/
sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets
/-- If two sets belong to a filter, then their intersection belongs to the filter as well. -/
inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets
#align filter Filter
/-- If `F` is a filter on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ F` as on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*} : Membership (Set α) (Filter α) :=
⟨fun U F => U ∈ F.sets⟩
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_mk {t : Set (Set α)} {h₁ h₂ h₃} : s ∈ mk t h₁ h₂ h₃ ↔ s ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_mk Filter.mem_mk
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_sets : s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sets Filter.mem_sets
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
#align filter.inhabited_mem Filter.inhabitedMem
theorem filter_eq : ∀ {f g : Filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align filter.filter_eq Filter.filter_eq
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
#align filter.filter_eq_iff Filter.filter_eq_iff
protected theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g := by
simp only [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff, Filter.mem_sets]
#align filter.ext_iff Filter.ext_iff
@[ext]
protected theorem ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g) → f = g :=
Filter.ext_iff.2
#align filter.ext Filter.ext
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
#align filter.coext Filter.coext
@[simp]
theorem univ_mem : univ ∈ f :=
f.univ_sets
#align filter.univ_mem Filter.univ_mem
theorem mem_of_superset {x y : Set α} (hx : x ∈ f) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : y ∈ f :=
f.sets_of_superset hx hxy
#align filter.mem_of_superset Filter.mem_of_superset
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
theorem inter_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : s ∩ t ∈ f :=
f.inter_sets hs ht
#align filter.inter_mem Filter.inter_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_iff Filter.inter_mem_iff
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.diff_mem Filter.diff_mem
theorem univ_mem' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s) : s ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset univ_mem fun x _ => h x
#align filter.univ_mem' Filter.univ_mem'
theorem mp_mem (hs : s ∈ f) (h : { x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t } ∈ f) : t ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hs h) fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ h₁
#align filter.mp_mem Filter.mp_mem
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
#align filter.congr_sets Filter.congr_sets
/-- Override `sets` field of a filter to provide better definitional equality. -/
protected def copy (f : Filter α) (S : Set (Set α)) (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : Filter α where
sets := S
univ_sets := (hmem _).2 univ_mem
sets_of_superset h hsub := (hmem _).2 <| mem_of_superset ((hmem _).1 h) hsub
inter_sets h₁ h₂ := (hmem _).2 <| inter_mem ((hmem _).1 h₁) ((hmem _).1 h₂)
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
@[simp] lemma mem_copy {S hmem} : s ∈ f.copy S hmem ↔ s ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem biInter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Finite) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
Finite.induction_on hf (by simp) fun _ _ hs => by simp [hs]
#align filter.bInter_mem Filter.biInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem biInter_finset_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} (is : Finset β) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
biInter_mem is.finite_toSet
#align filter.bInter_finset_mem Filter.biInter_finset_mem
alias _root_.Finset.iInter_mem_sets := biInter_finset_mem
#align finset.Inter_mem_sets Finset.iInter_mem_sets
-- attribute [protected] Finset.iInter_mem_sets porting note: doesn't work
@[simp]
theorem sInter_mem {s : Set (Set α)} (hfin : s.Finite) : ⋂₀ s ∈ f ↔ ∀ U ∈ s, U ∈ f := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem hfin]
#align filter.sInter_mem Filter.sInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem iInter_mem {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Finite β] : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f :=
(sInter_mem (finite_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align filter.Inter_mem Filter.iInter_mem
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_subset_iff Filter.exists_mem_subset_iff
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
#align filter.monotone_mem Filter.monotone_mem
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_and_iff Filter.exists_mem_and_iff
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
#align filter.forall_in_swap Filter.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
/--
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f` and terms
`h₁ : t₁ ∈ f, ⋯, hₙ : tₙ ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ t₁ → ⋯ → x ∈ tₙ → x ∈ s`.
The list is an optional parameter, `[]` being its default value.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ], intros a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ }`.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] using e` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
Combining both shortcuts is done by writing `filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ using e`.
Note that in this case, the `aᵢ` terms can be used in `e`.
-/
syntax (name := filterUpwards) "filter_upwards" (" [" term,* "]")?
(" with" (ppSpace colGt term:max)*)? (" using " term)? : tactic
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| filter_upwards $[[$[$args],*]]? $[with $wth*]? $[using $usingArg]?) => do
let config : ApplyConfig := {newGoals := ApplyNewGoals.nonDependentOnly}
for e in args.getD #[] |>.reverse do
let goal ← getMainGoal
replaceMainGoal <| ← goal.withContext <| runTermElab do
let m ← mkFreshExprMVar none
let lem ← Term.elabTermEnsuringType
(← ``(Filter.mp_mem $e $(← Term.exprToSyntax m))) (← goal.getType)
goal.assign lem
return [m.mvarId!]
liftMetaTactic fun goal => do
goal.apply (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels ``Filter.univ_mem') config
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| dsimp (config := {zeta := false}) only [Set.mem_setOf_eq])
if let some l := wth then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| intro $[$l]*)
if let some e := usingArg then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| exact $e)
end Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
section Principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : Set α) : Filter α where
sets := { t | s ⊆ t }
univ_sets := subset_univ s
sets_of_superset hx := Subset.trans hx
inter_sets := subset_inter
#align filter.principal Filter.principal
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "𝓟" => Filter.principal
@[simp] theorem mem_principal {s t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓟 t ↔ t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal Filter.mem_principal
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal_self Filter.mem_principal_self
end Principal
open Filter
section Join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : Filter (Filter α)) : Filter α where
sets := { s | { t : Filter α | s ∈ t } ∈ f }
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, univ_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, setOf_true]
sets_of_superset hx xy := mem_of_superset hx fun f h => mem_of_superset h xy
inter_sets hx hy := mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx hy) fun f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => inter_mem h₁ h₂
#align filter.join Filter.join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {s : Set α} {f : Filter (Filter α)} : s ∈ join f ↔ { t | s ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_join Filter.mem_join
end Join
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance : PartialOrder (Filter α) where
le f g := ∀ ⦃U : Set α⦄, U ∈ g → U ∈ f
le_antisymm a b h₁ h₂ := filter_eq <| Subset.antisymm h₂ h₁
le_refl a := Subset.rfl
le_trans a b c h₁ h₂ := Subset.trans h₂ h₁
theorem le_def : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g, x ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.le_def Filter.le_def
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align filter.not_le Filter.not_le
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
#align filter.generate_sets Filter.GenerateSets
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
#align filter.generate Filter.generate
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
#align filter.sets_iff_generate Filter.le_generate_iff
theorem mem_generate_iff {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} :
U ∈ generate s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, Set.Finite t ∧ ⋂₀ t ⊆ U := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction h with
| @basic V V_in =>
exact ⟨{V}, singleton_subset_iff.2 V_in, finite_singleton _, (sInter_singleton _).subset⟩
| univ => exact ⟨∅, empty_subset _, finite_empty, subset_univ _⟩
| superset _ hVW hV =>
rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, ht, htV.trans hVW⟩
| inter _ _ hV hW =>
rcases hV, hW with ⟨⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩, u, hus, hu, huW⟩
exact
⟨t ∪ u, union_subset hts hus, ht.union hu,
(sInter_union _ _).subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter htV huW⟩
· rcases h with ⟨t, hts, tfin, h⟩
exact mem_of_superset ((sInter_mem tfin).2 fun V hV => GenerateSets.basic <| hts hV) h
#align filter.mem_generate_iff Filter.mem_generate_iff
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
#align filter.mk_of_closure Filter.mkOfClosure
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.mk_of_closure_sets Filter.mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
#align filter.gi_generate Filter.giGenerate
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : Inf (Filter α) :=
⟨fun f g : Filter α =>
{ sets := { s | ∃ a ∈ f, ∃ b ∈ g, s = a ∩ b }
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem, _, univ_mem, by simp⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ xy
refine
⟨a ∪ y, mem_of_superset ha subset_union_left, b ∪ y,
mem_of_superset hb subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_union_distrib_right, union_eq_self_of_subset_left xy]
inter_sets := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a ∩ c, inter_mem ha hc, b ∩ d, inter_mem hb hd, ?_⟩
ac_rfl }⟩
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_inf_iff Filter.mem_inf_iff
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_left Filter.mem_inf_of_left
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_right Filter.mem_inf_of_right
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_inf Filter.inter_mem_inf
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
#align filter.mem_inf_of_inter Filter.mem_inf_of_inter
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_iff_superset Filter.mem_inf_iff_superset
instance : Top (Filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := { s | ∀ x, x ∈ s }
univ_sets := fun x => mem_univ x
sets_of_superset := fun hx hxy a => hxy (hx a)
inter_sets := fun hx hy _ => mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
theorem mem_top_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_top_iff_forall Filter.mem_top_iff_forall
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ s = univ := by
rw [mem_top_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.mem_top Filter.mem_top
section CompleteLattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for some lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) :=
{ @OrderDual.instCompleteLattice _ (giGenerate α).liftCompleteLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _s hs => (mem_top.1 hs).symm ▸ univ_mem
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
sSup := join ∘ 𝓟
le_sSup := fun _ _f hf _s hs => hs hf
sSup_le := fun _ _f hf _s hs _g hg => hf _ hg hs }
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
/-- A filter is `NeBot` if it is not equal to `⊥`, or equivalently the empty set does not belong to
the filter. Bourbaki include this assumption in the definition of a filter but we prefer to have a
`CompleteLattice` structure on `Filter _`, so we use a typeclass argument in lemmas instead. -/
class NeBot (f : Filter α) : Prop where
/-- The filter is nontrivial: `f ≠ ⊥` or equivalently, `∅ ∉ f`. -/
ne' : f ≠ ⊥
#align filter.ne_bot Filter.NeBot
theorem neBot_iff {f : Filter α} : NeBot f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align filter.ne_bot_iff Filter.neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
#align filter.ne_bot.ne Filter.NeBot.ne
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
#align filter.not_ne_bot Filter.not_neBot
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.mono Filter.NeBot.mono
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
#align filter.ne_bot_of_le Filter.neBot_of_le
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.sup_ne_bot Filter.sup_neBot
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
#align filter.not_disjoint_self_iff Filter.not_disjoint_self_iff
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
#align filter.bot_sets_eq Filter.bot_sets_eq
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
#align filter.sup_sets_eq Filter.sup_sets_eq
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
#align filter.Sup_sets_eq Filter.sSup_sets_eq
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
#align filter.supr_sets_eq Filter.iSup_sets_eq
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
#align filter.generate_empty Filter.generate_empty
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
#align filter.generate_univ Filter.generate_univ
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
#align filter.generate_union Filter.generate_union
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
#align filter.generate_Union Filter.generate_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : Filter α) :=
trivial
#align filter.mem_bot Filter.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sup Filter.mem_sup
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
#align filter.union_mem_sup Filter.union_mem_sup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {x : Set α} {s : Set (Filter α)} : x ∈ sSup s ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, x ∈ (f : Filter α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_Sup Filter.mem_sSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter]
#align filter.mem_supr Filter.mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
#align filter.supr_ne_bot Filter.iSup_neBot
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
show generate _ = generate _ from congr_arg _ <| congr_arg sSup <| (range_comp _ _).symm
#align filter.infi_eq_generate Filter.iInf_eq_generate
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
#align filter.mem_infi_of_mem Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem
theorem mem_iInf_of_iInter {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} {I : Set ι} (I_fin : I.Finite)
{V : I → Set α} (hV : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i) (hU : ⋂ i, V i ⊆ U) : U ∈ ⨅ i, s i := by
haveI := I_fin.fintype
refine mem_of_superset (iInter_mem.2 fun i => ?_) hU
exact mem_iInf_of_mem (i : ι) (hV _)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_Inter Filter.mem_iInf_of_iInter
theorem mem_iInf {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔ ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : I → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
constructor
· rw [iInf_eq_generate, mem_generate_iff]
rintro ⟨t, tsub, tfin, tinter⟩
rcases eq_finite_iUnion_of_finite_subset_iUnion tfin tsub with ⟨I, Ifin, σ, σfin, σsub, rfl⟩
rw [sInter_iUnion] at tinter
set V := fun i => U ∪ ⋂₀ σ i with hV
have V_in : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i := by
rintro i
have : ⋂₀ σ i ∈ s i := by
rw [sInter_mem (σfin _)]
apply σsub
exact mem_of_superset this subset_union_right
refine ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, ?_⟩
rwa [hV, ← union_iInter, union_eq_self_of_subset_right]
· rintro ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInf_of_iInter Ifin V_in Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_infi Filter.mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf' {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔
∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : ι → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧
(∀ i ∉ I, V i = univ) ∧ (U = ⋂ i ∈ I, V i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
simp only [mem_iInf, SetCoe.forall', biInter_eq_iInter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨I, If, V, hVs, _, hVU, _⟩ => ⟨I, If, fun i => V i, fun i => hVs i, hVU⟩⟩
rintro ⟨I, If, V, hV, rfl⟩
refine ⟨I, If, fun i => if hi : i ∈ I then V ⟨i, hi⟩ else univ, fun i => ?_, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [hV _, univ_mem]
· exact dif_neg hi
· simp only [iInter_dite, biInter_eq_iInter, dif_pos (Subtype.coe_prop _), Subtype.coe_eta,
iInter_univ, inter_univ, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
#align filter.mem_infi' Filter.mem_iInf'
theorem exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} {s}
(hs : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) : ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i :=
let ⟨_, _, V, hVs, _, _, hVU'⟩ := mem_iInf'.1 hs; ⟨V, hVs, hVU'⟩
#align filter.exists_Inter_of_mem_infi Filter.exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf_of_finite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
(s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i := by
refine ⟨exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun i => mem_iInf_of_mem i (ht i)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_finite Filter.mem_iInf_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
#align filter.le_principal_iff Filter.le_principal_iff
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
#align filter.Iic_principal Filter.Iic_principal
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, iff_self_iff, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_mono Filter.principal_mono
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
#align filter.monotone_principal Filter.monotone_principal
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
#align filter.principal_eq_iff_eq Filter.principal_eq_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
#align filter.join_principal_eq_Sup Filter.join_principal_eq_sSup
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.principal_univ Filter.principal_univ
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
#align filter.principal_empty Filter.principal_empty
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
#align filter.generate_eq_binfi Filter.generate_eq_biInf
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
#align filter.empty_mem_iff_bot Filter.empty_mem_iff_bot
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
#align filter.nonempty_of_mem Filter.nonempty_of_mem
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
#align filter.ne_bot.nonempty_of_mem Filter.NeBot.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
#align filter.empty_not_mem Filter.empty_not_mem
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
#align filter.nonempty_of_ne_bot Filter.nonempty_of_neBot
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
#align filter.compl_not_mem Filter.compl_not_mem
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
#align filter.filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty Filter.filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
#align filter.disjoint_iff Filter.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem Filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.not_disjoint Filter.NeBot.not_disjoint
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
#align filter.inf_eq_bot_iff Filter.inf_eq_bot_iff
theorem _root_.Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {l : ι → Filter α}
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on l)) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on s) := by
have : Pairwise fun i j => ∃ (s : {s // s ∈ l i}) (t : {t // t ∈ l j}), Disjoint s.1 t.1 := by
simpa only [Pairwise, Function.onFun, Filter.disjoint_iff, exists_prop, Subtype.exists] using hd
choose! s t hst using this
refine ⟨fun i => ⋂ j, @s i j ∩ @t j i, fun i => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exacts [iInter_mem.2 fun j => inter_mem (@s i j).2 (@t j i).2,
(hst hij).mono ((iInter_subset _ j).trans inter_subset_left)
((iInter_subset _ i).trans inter_subset_right)]
#align pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter {ι : Type*} {l : ι → Filter α} {t : Set ι}
(hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint l) (ht : t.Finite) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ t.PairwiseDisjoint s := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rcases (hd.subtype _ _).exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint with ⟨s, hsl, hsd⟩
lift s to (i : t) → {s // s ∈ l i} using hsl
rcases @Subtype.exists_pi_extension ι (fun i => { s // s ∈ l i }) _ _ s with ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun i => s i, fun i => (s i).2, hsd.set_of_subtype _ _⟩
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.exists_mem_filter Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
#align filter.unique Filter.unique
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
#align filter.eq_top_of_ne_bot Filter.eq_top_of_neBot
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
#align filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot Filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, NeBot.ne <| forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1
fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
#align filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty Filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
#align filter.eq_Inf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans exists_range_iff.symm
#align filter.eq_infi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
#align filter.eq_binfi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_memₓ
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
-- Porting note: it was just `congr_arg filter.sets this.symm`
(congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm).trans <| by simp only
#align filter.infi_sets_eq Filter.iInf_sets_eq
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
#align filter.mem_infi_of_directed Filter.mem_iInf_of_directed
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
#align filter.mem_binfi_of_directed Filter.mem_biInf_of_directed
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
#align filter.binfi_sets_eq Filter.biInf_sets_eq
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset ι, (⨅ i ∈ t, f i).sets := by
rw [iInf_eq_iInf_finset, iInf_sets_eq]
exact directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ => biInf_mono
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite' (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset (PLift ι), (⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i)).sets := by
rw [← iInf_sets_eq_finite, ← Equiv.plift.surjective.iInf_comp, Equiv.plift_apply]
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite' Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite'
theorem mem_iInf_finite {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset ι, s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f i :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite Filter.mem_iInf_finite
theorem mem_iInf_finite' {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset (PLift ι), s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i) :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite' f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite' Filter.mem_iInf_finite'
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
#align filter.sup_join Filter.sup_join
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
#align filter.supr_join Filter.iSup_join
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
-- The dual version does not hold! `Filter α` is not a `CompleteDistribLattice`. -/
instance : Coframe (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf := fun f s t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [iInf_subtype']
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_sets_eq_finite, mem_iUnion] at h₂
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := h₂
rw [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hu
suffices ⨅ i : s, f ⊔ ↑i ≤ f ⊔ u.inf fun i => ↑i from this ⟨h₁, hu⟩
refine Finset.induction_on u (le_sup_of_le_right le_top) ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ u _ ih
rw [Finset.inf_insert, sup_inf_left]
exact le_inf (iInf_le _ _) ih }
theorem mem_iInf_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Filter β} {t : Set β} :
(t ∈ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) ↔ ∃ p : α → Set β, (∀ a ∈ s, p a ∈ f a) ∧ t = ⋂ a ∈ s, p a := by
simp only [← Finset.set_biInter_coe, biInter_eq_iInter, iInf_subtype']
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases (mem_iInf_of_finite _).1 h with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
refine ⟨fun a => if h : a ∈ s then p ⟨a, h⟩ else univ,
fun a ha => by simpa [ha] using hp ⟨a, ha⟩, ?_⟩
refine iInter_congr_of_surjective id surjective_id ?_
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
simp [ha]
· rintro ⟨p, hpf, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun a => mem_iInf_of_mem a (hpf a a.2)
#align filter.mem_infi_finset Filter.mem_iInf_finset
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed'
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed'
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed'
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iInf_sets_induct {f : ι → Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ iInf f) {p : Set α → Prop}
(uni : p univ) (ins : ∀ {i s₁ s₂}, s₁ ∈ f i → p s₂ → p (s₁ ∩ s₂)) : p s := by
rw [mem_iInf_finite'] at hs
simp only [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨is, his⟩
induction is using Finset.induction_on generalizing s with
| empty => rwa [mem_top.1 his]
| insert _ ih =>
rw [Finset.inf_insert, mem_inf_iff] at his
rcases his with ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, rfl⟩
exact ins hs₁ (ih hs₂)
#align filter.infi_sets_induct Filter.iInf_sets_induct
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
#align filter.inf_principal Filter.inf_principal
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
#align filter.sup_principal Filter.sup_principal
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
#align filter.supr_principal Filter.iSup_principal
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
#align filter.principal_eq_bot_iff Filter.principal_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align filter.principal_ne_bot_iff Filter.principal_neBot_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
#align set.nonempty.principal_ne_bot Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
#align filter.is_compl_principal Filter.isCompl_principal
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal' Filter.mem_inf_principal'
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal Filter.mem_inf_principal
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
#align filter.supr_inf_principal Filter.iSup_inf_principal
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
#align filter.mem_of_eq_bot Filter.mem_of_eq_bot
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
#align filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl Filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_le_iff Filter.principal_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal_finset {ι : Type w} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs
· simp
· rw [Finset.iInf_insert, Finset.set_biInter_insert, hs, inf_principal]
#align filter.infi_principal_finset Filter.iInf_principal_finset
theorem iInf_principal {ι : Sort w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype (PLift ι)
rw [← iInf_plift_down, ← iInter_plift_down]
simpa using iInf_principal_finset Finset.univ (f <| PLift.down ·)
/-- A special case of `iInf_principal` that is safe to mark `simp`. -/
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal' {ι : Type w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) :=
iInf_principal _
#align filter.infi_principal Filter.iInf_principal
theorem iInf_principal_finite {ι : Type w} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
lift s to Finset ι using hs
exact mod_cast iInf_principal_finset s f
#align filter.infi_principal_finite Filter.iInf_principal_finite
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
#align filter.join_mono Filter.join_mono
/-! ### Eventually -/
/-- `f.Eventually p` or `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | p x} ∈ f`. E.g., `∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that `p` holds true for sufficiently large `x`. -/
protected def Eventually (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
{ x | p x } ∈ f
#align filter.eventually Filter.Eventually
@[inherit_doc Filter.Eventually]
notation3 "∀ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p f) => r
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_iff Filter.eventually_iff
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_mem_set Filter.eventually_mem_set
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
#align filter.ext' Filter.ext'
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
#align filter.eventually.filter_mono Filter.Eventually.filter_mono
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
#align filter.eventually_of_mem Filter.eventually_of_mem
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
#align filter.eventually.and Filter.Eventually.and
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
#align filter.eventually_true Filter.eventually_true
theorem eventually_of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
#align filter.eventually_of_forall Filter.eventually_of_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
#align filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot Filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
#align filter.eventually_const Filter.eventually_const
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
#align filter.eventually.exists_mem Filter.Eventually.exists_mem
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
#align filter.eventually.mp Filter.Eventually.mp
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (eventually_of_forall hq)
#align filter.eventually.mono Filter.Eventually.mono
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
#align filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall Filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
#align filter.eventually_and Filter.eventually_and
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
#align filter.eventually.congr Filter.Eventually.congr
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
#align filter.eventually_congr Filter.eventually_congr
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p i x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using iInter_mem
#align filter.eventually_all Filter.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all_finite {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using biInter_mem hI
#align filter.eventually_all_finite Filter.eventually_all_finite
alias _root_.Set.Finite.eventually_all := eventually_all_finite
#align set.finite.eventually_all Set.Finite.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Set.Finite.eventually_all
@[simp] theorem eventually_all_finset {ι} (I : Finset ι) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x :=
I.finite_toSet.eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_all_finset Filter.eventually_all_finset
alias _root_.Finset.eventually_all := eventually_all_finset
#align finset.eventually_all Finset.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Finset.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_left Filter.eventually_or_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_right Filter.eventually_or_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
#align filter.eventually_bot Filter.eventually_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_top Filter.eventually_top
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_sup Filter.eventually_sup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_Sup Filter.eventually_sSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
#align filter.eventually_supr Filter.eventually_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_principal Filter.eventually_principal
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
#align filter.eventually_inf Filter.eventually_inf
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_inf_principal Filter.eventually_inf_principal
/-! ### Frequently -/
/-- `f.Frequently p` or `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`. E.g., `∃ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that there exist arbitrarily large `x` for which `p` holds true. -/
protected def Frequently (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
¬∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x
#align filter.frequently Filter.Frequently
@[inherit_doc Filter.Frequently]
notation3 "∃ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Frequently p f) => r
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
#align filter.eventually.frequently Filter.Eventually.frequently
theorem frequently_of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (eventually_of_forall h)
#align filter.frequently_of_forall Filter.frequently_of_forall
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
#align filter.frequently.mp Filter.Frequently.mp
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
#align filter.frequently.filter_mono Filter.Frequently.filter_mono
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (eventually_of_forall hpq)
#align filter.frequently.mono Filter.Frequently.mono
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
#align filter.frequently.and_eventually Filter.Frequently.and_eventually
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
#align filter.eventually.and_frequently Filter.Eventually.and_frequently
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := eventually_of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
#align filter.frequently.exists Filter.Frequently.exists
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
#align filter.eventually.exists Filter.Eventually.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp q hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
#align filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and Filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
#align filter.frequently_iff Filter.frequently_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.not_eventually Filter.not_eventually
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
#align filter.not_frequently Filter.not_frequently
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
#align filter.frequently_true_iff_ne_bot Filter.frequently_true_iff_neBot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
#align filter.frequently_false Filter.frequently_false
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align filter.frequently_const Filter.frequently_const
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib Filter.frequently_or_distrib
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_left Filter.frequently_or_distrib_left
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_right Filter.frequently_or_distrib_right
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib Filter.frequently_imp_distrib
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_left Filter.frequently_and_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_right Filter.frequently_and_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_bot Filter.frequently_bot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.frequently_top Filter.frequently_top
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
#align filter.frequently_principal Filter.frequently_principal
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
#align filter.frequently_sup Filter.frequently_sup
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
#align filter.frequently_Sup Filter.frequently_sSup
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
#align filter.frequently_supr Filter.frequently_iSup
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
#align filter.eventually.choice Filter.Eventually.choice
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
/-- Two functions `f` and `g` are *eventually equal* along a filter `l` if the set of `x` such that
`f x = g x` belongs to `l`. -/
def EventuallyEq (l : Filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x
#align filter.eventually_eq Filter.EventuallyEq
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 f " =ᶠ[" l:50 "] " g:50 => EventuallyEq l f g
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x :=
h
#align filter.eventually_eq.eventually Filter.EventuallyEq.eventually
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.rw Filter.EventuallyEq.rw
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| eventually_of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
#align filter.eventually_eq_set Filter.eventuallyEq_set
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
#align filter.eventually_eq.mem_iff Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_iff
#align filter.eventually.set_eq Filter.Eventually.set_eq
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
#align filter.eventually_eq_univ Filter.eventuallyEq_univ
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
#align filter.eventually_eq.exists_mem Filter.EventuallyEq.exists_mem
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
#align filter.eventually_eq_of_mem Filter.eventuallyEq_of_mem
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
#align filter.eventually_eq_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
#align filter.eventually_eq.filter_mono Filter.EventuallyEq.filter_mono
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.refl Filter.EventuallyEq.refl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
#align filter.eventually_eq.rfl Filter.EventuallyEq.rfl
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.symm Filter.EventuallyEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans Filter.EventuallyEq.trans
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prod_mk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
#align filter.eventually_eq.prod_mk Filter.EventuallyEq.prod_mk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
#align filter.eventually_eq.fun_comp Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prod_mk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
#align filter.eventually_eq.comp₂ Filter.EventuallyEq.comp₂
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.mul Filter.EventuallyEq.mul
#align filter.eventually_eq.add Filter.EventuallyEq.add
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ):
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
#align filter.eventually_eq.const_smul Filter.EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
#align filter.eventually_eq.inv Filter.EventuallyEq.inv
#align filter.eventually_eq.neg Filter.EventuallyEq.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.div Filter.EventuallyEq.div
#align filter.eventually_eq.sub Filter.EventuallyEq.sub
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
#align filter.eventually_eq.const_vadd Filter.EventuallyEq.const_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.smul Filter.EventuallyEq.smul
#align filter.eventually_eq.vadd Filter.EventuallyEq.vadd
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Sup β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.sup Filter.EventuallyEq.sup
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Inf β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.inf Filter.EventuallyEq.inf
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
#align filter.eventually_eq.preimage Filter.EventuallyEq.preimage
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.inter Filter.EventuallyEq.inter
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.union Filter.EventuallyEq.union
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
#align filter.eventually_eq.compl Filter.EventuallyEq.compl
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
#align filter.eventually_eq.diff Filter.EventuallyEq.diff
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
#align filter.eventually_eq_empty Filter.eventuallyEq_empty
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
#align filter.inter_eventually_eq_left Filter.inter_eventuallyEq_left
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
#align filter.inter_eventually_eq_right Filter.inter_eventuallyEq_right
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq_principal Filter.eventuallyEq_principal
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_eq_inf_principal_iff Filter.eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.sub_eq Filter.EventuallyEq.sub_eq
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
#align filter.eventually_eq_iff_sub Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_sub
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
/-- A function `f` is eventually less than or equal to a function `g` at a filter `l`. -/
def EventuallyLE (l : Filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x
#align filter.eventually_le Filter.EventuallyLE
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 f " ≤ᶠ[" l:50 "] " g:50 => EventuallyLE l f g
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
#align filter.eventually_le.congr Filter.EventuallyLE.congr
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
#align filter.eventually_le_congr Filter.eventuallyLE_congr
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
#align filter.eventually_eq.le Filter.EventuallyEq.le
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
#align filter.eventually_le.refl Filter.EventuallyLE.refl
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
#align filter.eventually_le.rfl Filter.EventuallyLE.rfl
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
#align filter.eventually_le.trans Filter.EventuallyLE.trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_le Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_le
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
#align filter.eventually_le.trans_eq Filter.EventuallyLE.trans_eq
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
#align filter.eventually_le.antisymm Filter.EventuallyLE.antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
#align filter.eventually_le_antisymm_iff Filter.eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
#align filter.eventually_le.le_iff_eq Filter.EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
#align filter.eventually.ne_of_lt Filter.Eventually.ne_of_lt
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
#align filter.eventually.ne_top_of_lt Filter.Eventually.ne_top_of_lt
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
#align filter.eventually.lt_top_of_ne Filter.Eventually.lt_top_of_ne
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
#align filter.eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top Filter.Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
#align filter.eventually_le.inter Filter.EventuallyLE.inter
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
#align filter.eventually_le.union Filter.EventuallyLE.union
protected lemma EventuallyLE.iUnion [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋃ i, s i) ≤ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(eventually_all.2 h).mono fun _x hx hx' ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 hx'; mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hx i hi⟩
protected lemma EventuallyEq.iUnion [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋃ i, s i) =ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.iUnion fun i ↦ (h i).le).antisymm <| .iUnion fun i ↦ (h i).symm.le
protected lemma EventuallyLE.iInter [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋂ i, s i) ≤ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(eventually_all.2 h).mono fun _x hx hx' ↦ mem_iInter.2 fun i ↦ hx i (mem_iInter.1 hx' i)
protected lemma EventuallyEq.iInter [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋂ i, s i) =ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.iInter fun i ↦ (h i).le).antisymm <| .iInter fun i ↦ (h i).symm.le
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact .iUnion fun i ↦ hle i.1 i.2
alias EventuallyLE.biUnion := Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
(EventuallyLE.biUnion hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).le).antisymm <|
.biUnion hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).symm.le
alias EventuallyEq.biUnion := Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biInter_eq_iInter, biInter_eq_iInter]
exact .iInter fun i ↦ hle i.1 i.2
alias EventuallyLE.biInter := Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iInter
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
(EventuallyLE.biInter hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).le).antisymm <|
.biInter hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).symm.le
alias EventuallyEq.biInter := Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iInter
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyLE_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biUnion s.finite_toSet hle
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyEq_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biUnion s.finite_toSet heq
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyLE_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biInter s.finite_toSet hle
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyEq_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biInter s.finite_toSet heq
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
#align filter.eventually_le.compl Filter.EventuallyLE.compl
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
#align filter.eventually_le.diff Filter.EventuallyLE.diff
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
#align filter.set_eventually_le_iff_mem_inf_principal Filter.set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and_iff, le_principal_iff]
#align filter.set_eventually_le_iff_inf_principal_le Filter.set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
#align filter.set_eventually_eq_iff_inf_principal Filter.set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul [MulZeroClass β] [PartialOrder β] [PosMulMono β] [MulPosMono β]
{l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) (hg₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g₁)
(hf₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg, hg₀, hf₀] with x using _root_.mul_le_mul
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_le_mul Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul
@[to_additive EventuallyLE.add_le_add]
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul' [Mul β] [Preorder β] [CovariantClass β β (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)]
[CovariantClass β β (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β}
(hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.mul_le_mul' hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_le_mul' Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul'
#align filter.eventually_le.add_le_add Filter.EventuallyLE.add_le_add
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_nonneg [OrderedSemiring β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f)
(hg : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g) : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f * g := by filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x using _root_.mul_nonneg
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_nonneg Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_nonneg
theorem eventually_sub_nonneg [OrderedRing β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
0 ≤ᶠ[l] g - f ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_congr <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => sub_nonneg
#align filter.eventually_sub_nonneg Filter.eventually_sub_nonneg
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.sup Filter.EventuallyLE.sup
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.sup_le Filter.EventuallyLE.sup_le
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
#align filter.eventually_le.le_sup_of_le_left Filter.EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
#align filter.eventually_le.le_sup_of_le_right Filter.EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
#align filter.join_le Filter.join_le
/-! ### Push-forwards, pull-backs, and the monad structure -/
section Map
/-- The forward map of a filter -/
def map (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := preimage m ⁻¹' f.sets
univ_sets := univ_mem
sets_of_superset hs st := mem_of_superset hs <| preimage_mono st
inter_sets hs ht := inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.map Filter.map
@[simp]
theorem map_principal {s : Set α} {f : α → β} : map f (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (Set.image f s) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => image_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.map_principal Filter.map_principal
variable {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
@[simp]
theorem eventually_map {P : β → Prop} : (∀ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∀ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_map Filter.eventually_map
@[simp]
theorem frequently_map {P : β → Prop} : (∃ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∃ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.frequently_map Filter.frequently_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map : t ∈ map m f ↔ m ⁻¹' t ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map Filter.mem_map
theorem mem_map' : t ∈ map m f ↔ { x | m x ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map' Filter.mem_map'
theorem image_mem_map (hs : s ∈ f) : m '' s ∈ map m f :=
f.sets_of_superset hs <| subset_preimage_image m s
#align filter.image_mem_map Filter.image_mem_map
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Filter.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem image_mem_map_iff (hf : Injective m) : m '' s ∈ map m f ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← preimage_image_eq s hf], image_mem_map⟩
#align filter.image_mem_map_iff Filter.image_mem_map_iff
theorem range_mem_map : range m ∈ map m f := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact image_mem_map univ_mem
#align filter.range_mem_map Filter.range_mem_map
theorem mem_map_iff_exists_image : t ∈ map m f ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, m '' s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun ht => ⟨m ⁻¹' t, ht, image_preimage_subset _ _⟩, fun ⟨_, hs, ht⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (image_mem_map hs) ht⟩
#align filter.mem_map_iff_exists_image Filter.mem_map_iff_exists_image
@[simp]
theorem map_id : Filter.map id f = f :=
filter_eq <| rfl
#align filter.map_id Filter.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : Filter.map (fun x => x) f = f :=
map_id
#align filter.map_id' Filter.map_id'
@[simp]
theorem map_compose : Filter.map m' ∘ Filter.map m = Filter.map (m' ∘ m) :=
funext fun _ => filter_eq <| rfl
#align filter.map_compose Filter.map_compose
@[simp]
theorem map_map : Filter.map m' (Filter.map m f) = Filter.map (m' ∘ m) f :=
congr_fun Filter.map_compose f
#align filter.map_map Filter.map_map
/-- If functions `m₁` and `m₂` are eventually equal at a filter `f`, then
they map this filter to the same filter. -/
theorem map_congr {m₁ m₂ : α → β} {f : Filter α} (h : m₁ =ᶠ[f] m₂) : map m₁ f = map m₂ f :=
Filter.ext' fun _ => eventually_congr (h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl)
#align filter.map_congr Filter.map_congr
end Map
section Comap
/-- The inverse map of a filter. A set `s` belongs to `Filter.comap m f` if either of the following
equivalent conditions hold.
1. There exists a set `t ∈ f` such that `m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s`. This is used as a definition.
2. The set `kernImage m s = {y | ∀ x, m x = y → x ∈ s}` belongs to `f`, see `Filter.mem_comap'`.
3. The set `(m '' sᶜ)ᶜ` belongs to `f`, see `Filter.mem_comap_iff_compl` and
`Filter.compl_mem_comap`. -/
def comap (m : α → β) (f : Filter β) : Filter α where
sets := { s | ∃ t ∈ f, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s }
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, by simp only [subset_univ, preimage_univ]⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab => ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩ =>
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁, inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂⟩
#align filter.comap Filter.comap
variable {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α}
theorem mem_comap' : s ∈ comap f l ↔ { y | ∀ ⦃x⦄, f x = y → x ∈ s } ∈ l :=
⟨fun ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht fun y hy x hx => hts <| mem_preimage.2 <| by rwa [hx],
fun h => ⟨_, h, fun x hx => hx rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.mem_comap' Filter.mem_comap'
-- TODO: it would be nice to use `kernImage` much more to take advantage of common name and API,
-- and then this would become `mem_comap'`
theorem mem_comap'' : s ∈ comap f l ↔ kernImage f s ∈ l :=
mem_comap'
/-- RHS form is used, e.g., in the definition of `UniformSpace`. -/
lemma mem_comap_prod_mk {x : α} {s : Set β} {F : Filter (α × β)} :
s ∈ comap (Prod.mk x) F ↔ {p : α × β | p.fst = x → p.snd ∈ s} ∈ F := by
simp_rw [mem_comap', Prod.ext_iff, and_imp, @forall_swap β (_ = _), forall_eq, eq_comm]
#align filter.mem_comap_prod_mk Filter.mem_comap_prod_mk
@[simp]
theorem eventually_comap : (∀ᶠ a in comap f l, p a) ↔ ∀ᶠ b in l, ∀ a, f a = b → p a :=
mem_comap'
#align filter.eventually_comap Filter.eventually_comap
@[simp]
theorem frequently_comap : (∃ᶠ a in comap f l, p a) ↔ ∃ᶠ b in l, ∃ a, f a = b ∧ p a := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_comap, not_exists, _root_.not_and]
#align filter.frequently_comap Filter.frequently_comap
theorem mem_comap_iff_compl : s ∈ comap f l ↔ (f '' sᶜ)ᶜ ∈ l := by
simp only [mem_comap'', kernImage_eq_compl]
#align filter.mem_comap_iff_compl Filter.mem_comap_iff_compl
theorem compl_mem_comap : sᶜ ∈ comap f l ↔ (f '' s)ᶜ ∈ l := by rw [mem_comap_iff_compl, compl_compl]
#align filter.compl_mem_comap Filter.compl_mem_comap
end Comap
section KernMap
/-- The analog of `kernImage` for filters. A set `s` belongs to `Filter.kernMap m f` if either of
the following equivalent conditions hold.
1. There exists a set `t ∈ f` such that `s = kernImage m t`. This is used as a definition.
2. There exists a set `t` such that `tᶜ ∈ f` and `sᶜ = m '' t`, see `Filter.mem_kernMap_iff_compl`
and `Filter.compl_mem_kernMap`.
This definition because it gives a right adjoint to `Filter.comap`, and because it has a nice
interpretation when working with `co-` filters (`Filter.cocompact`, `Filter.cofinite`, ...).
For example, `kernMap m (cocompact α)` is the filter generated by the complements of the sets
`m '' K` where `K` is a compact subset of `α`. -/
def kernMap (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := (kernImage m) '' f.sets
univ_sets := ⟨univ, f.univ_sets, by simp [kernImage_eq_compl]⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro _ t ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩ hst
refine ⟨s ∪ m ⁻¹' t, mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [kernImage_union_preimage, union_eq_right.mpr hst]
inter_sets := by
rintro _ _ ⟨s₁, h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁ ∩ s₂, f.inter_sets h₁ h₂, Set.preimage_kernImage.u_inf⟩
variable {m : α → β} {f : Filter α}
theorem mem_kernMap {s : Set β} : s ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, kernImage m t = s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_kernMap_iff_compl {s : Set β} : s ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t, tᶜ ∈ f ∧ m '' t = sᶜ := by
rw [mem_kernMap, compl_surjective.exists]
refine exists_congr (fun x ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦ ?_)
rw [kernImage_compl, compl_eq_comm, eq_comm]
theorem compl_mem_kernMap {s : Set β} : sᶜ ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t, tᶜ ∈ f ∧ m '' t = s := by
simp_rw [mem_kernMap_iff_compl, compl_compl]
end KernMap
/-- The monadic bind operation on filter is defined the usual way in terms of `map` and `join`.
Unfortunately, this `bind` does not result in the expected applicative. See `Filter.seq` for the
applicative instance. -/
def bind (f : Filter α) (m : α → Filter β) : Filter β :=
join (map m f)
#align filter.bind Filter.bind
/-- The applicative sequentiation operation. This is not induced by the bind operation. -/
def seq (f : Filter (α → β)) (g : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := { s | ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ m ∈ u, ∀ x ∈ t, (m : α → β) x ∈ s }
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, univ, univ_mem, fun _ _ _ _ => trivial⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, h⟩ hst =>
⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, fun _ hx _ hy => hst <| h _ hx _ hy⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨t₀, ht₀, t₁, ht₁, ht⟩ ⟨u₀, hu₀, u₁, hu₁, hu⟩ =>
⟨t₀ ∩ u₀, inter_mem ht₀ hu₀, t₁ ∩ u₁, inter_mem ht₁ hu₁, fun _ ⟨hx₀, hx₁⟩ _ ⟨hy₀, hy₁⟩ =>
⟨ht _ hx₀ _ hy₀, hu _ hx₁ _ hy₁⟩⟩
#align filter.seq Filter.seq
/-- `pure x` is the set of sets that contain `x`. It is equal to `𝓟 {x}` but
with this definition we have `s ∈ pure a` defeq `a ∈ s`. -/
instance : Pure Filter :=
⟨fun x =>
{ sets := { s | x ∈ s }
inter_sets := And.intro
sets_of_superset := fun hs hst => hst hs
univ_sets := trivial }⟩
instance : Bind Filter :=
⟨@Filter.bind⟩
instance : Functor Filter where map := @Filter.map
instance : LawfulFunctor (Filter : Type u → Type u) where
id_map _ := map_id
comp_map _ _ _ := map_map.symm
map_const := rfl
theorem pure_sets (a : α) : (pure a : Filter α).sets = { s | a ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align filter.pure_sets Filter.pure_sets
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ (pure a : Filter α) ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_pure Filter.mem_pure
@[simp]
theorem eventually_pure {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in pure a, p x) ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_pure Filter.eventually_pure
@[simp]
theorem principal_singleton (a : α) : 𝓟 {a} = pure a :=
Filter.ext fun s => by simp only [mem_pure, mem_principal, singleton_subset_iff]
#align filter.principal_singleton Filter.principal_singleton
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
#align filter.map_pure Filter.map_pure
theorem pure_le_principal (a : α) : pure a ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp
@[simp] theorem join_pure (f : Filter α) : join (pure f) = f := rfl
#align filter.join_pure Filter.join_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_bind (a : α) (m : α → Filter β) : bind (pure a) m = m a := by
simp only [Bind.bind, bind, map_pure, join_pure]
#align filter.pure_bind Filter.pure_bind
theorem map_bind {α β} (m : β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : α → Filter β) :
map m (bind f g) = bind f (map m ∘ g) :=
rfl
theorem bind_map {α β} (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) (g : β → Filter γ) :
(bind (map m f) g) = bind f (g ∘ m) :=
rfl
/-!
### `Filter` as a `Monad`
In this section we define `Filter.monad`, a `Monad` structure on `Filter`s. This definition is not
an instance because its `Seq` projection is not equal to the `Filter.seq` function we use in the
`Applicative` instance on `Filter`.
-/
section
/-- The monad structure on filters. -/
protected def monad : Monad Filter where map := @Filter.map
#align filter.monad Filter.monad
attribute [local instance] Filter.monad
protected theorem lawfulMonad : LawfulMonad Filter where
map_const := rfl
id_map _ := rfl
seqLeft_eq _ _ := rfl
seqRight_eq _ _ := rfl
pure_seq _ _ := rfl
bind_pure_comp _ _ := rfl
bind_map _ _ := rfl
pure_bind _ _ := rfl
bind_assoc _ _ _ := rfl
#align filter.is_lawful_monad Filter.lawfulMonad
end
instance : Alternative Filter where
seq := fun x y => x.seq (y ())
failure := ⊥
orElse x y := x ⊔ y ()
@[simp]
theorem map_def {α β} (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : m <$> f = map m f :=
rfl
#align filter.map_def Filter.map_def
@[simp]
theorem bind_def {α β} (f : Filter α) (m : α → Filter β) : f >>= m = bind f m :=
rfl
#align filter.bind_def Filter.bind_def
/-! #### `map` and `comap` equations -/
section Map
variable {f f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g g₁ g₂ : Filter β} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
@[simp] theorem mem_comap : s ∈ comap m g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_comap Filter.mem_comap
theorem preimage_mem_comap (ht : t ∈ g) : m ⁻¹' t ∈ comap m g :=
⟨t, ht, Subset.rfl⟩
#align filter.preimage_mem_comap Filter.preimage_mem_comap
theorem Eventually.comap {p : β → Prop} (hf : ∀ᶠ b in g, p b) (f : α → β) :
∀ᶠ a in comap f g, p (f a) :=
preimage_mem_comap hf
#align filter.eventually.comap Filter.Eventually.comap
theorem comap_id : comap id f = f :=
le_antisymm (fun _ => preimage_mem_comap) fun _ ⟨_, ht, hst⟩ => mem_of_superset ht hst
#align filter.comap_id Filter.comap_id
theorem comap_id' : comap (fun x => x) f = f := comap_id
#align filter.comap_id' Filter.comap_id'
theorem comap_const_of_not_mem {x : β} (ht : t ∈ g) (hx : x ∉ t) : comap (fun _ : α => x) g = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| mem_comap'.2 <| mem_of_superset ht fun _ hx' _ h => hx <| h.symm ▸ hx'
#align filter.comap_const_of_not_mem Filter.comap_const_of_not_mem
theorem comap_const_of_mem {x : β} (h : ∀ t ∈ g, x ∈ t) : comap (fun _ : α => x) g = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun _ hs => univ_mem' fun _ => h _ (mem_comap'.1 hs) rfl
#align filter.comap_const_of_mem Filter.comap_const_of_mem
theorem map_const [NeBot f] {c : β} : (f.map fun _ => c) = pure c := by
ext s
by_cases h : c ∈ s <;> simp [h]
#align filter.map_const Filter.map_const
theorem comap_comap {m : γ → β} {n : β → α} : comap m (comap n f) = comap (n ∘ m) f :=
Filter.coext fun s => by simp only [compl_mem_comap, image_image, (· ∘ ·)]
#align filter.comap_comap Filter.comap_comap
section comm
/-!
The variables in the following lemmas are used as in this diagram:
```
φ
α → β
θ ↓ ↓ ψ
γ → δ
ρ
```
-/
variable {φ : α → β} {θ : α → γ} {ψ : β → δ} {ρ : γ → δ} (H : ψ ∘ φ = ρ ∘ θ)
theorem map_comm (F : Filter α) : map ψ (map φ F) = map ρ (map θ F) := by
rw [Filter.map_map, H, ← Filter.map_map]
#align filter.map_comm Filter.map_comm
theorem comap_comm (G : Filter δ) : comap φ (comap ψ G) = comap θ (comap ρ G) := by
rw [Filter.comap_comap, H, ← Filter.comap_comap]
#align filter.comap_comm Filter.comap_comm
end comm
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.filter_map {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) :=
map_comm h.comp_eq
#align function.semiconj.filter_map Function.Semiconj.filter_map
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.filter_map {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (map f) (map g) :=
h.semiconj.filter_map
#align function.commute.filter_map Function.Commute.filter_map
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.filter_comap {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (comap f) (comap gb) (comap ga) :=
comap_comm h.comp_eq.symm
#align function.semiconj.filter_comap Function.Semiconj.filter_comap
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.filter_comap {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (comap f) (comap g) :=
h.semiconj.filter_comap
#align function.commute.filter_comap Function.Commute.filter_comap
section
open Filter
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.filter_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInverse g f) :
LeftInverse (map g) (map f) := fun F ↦ by
rw [map_map, hfg.comp_eq_id, map_id]
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.filter_comap {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInverse g f) :
RightInverse (comap g) (comap f) := fun F ↦ by
rw [comap_comap, hfg.comp_eq_id, comap_id]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.filter_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInverse g f) : RightInverse (map g) (map f) :=
hfg.filter_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.filter_comap {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInverse g f) : LeftInverse (comap g) (comap f) :=
hfg.filter_comap
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.filter_map_Iic {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInvOn g f s) :
LeftInvOn (map g) (map f) (Iic <| 𝓟 s) := fun F (hF : F ≤ 𝓟 s) ↦ by
have : (g ∘ f) =ᶠ[𝓟 s] id := by simpa only [eventuallyEq_principal] using hfg
rw [map_map, map_congr (this.filter_mono hF), map_id]
nonrec theorem _root_.Set.RightInvOn.filter_map_Iic {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInvOn g f t) : RightInvOn (map g) (map f) (Iic <| 𝓟 t) :=
hfg.filter_map_Iic
end
@[simp]
theorem comap_principal {t : Set β} : comap m (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' t) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨_u, hu, b⟩ => (preimage_mono hu).trans b,
fun h => ⟨t, Subset.rfl, h⟩⟩
#align filter.comap_principal Filter.comap_principal
theorem principal_subtype {α : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set s) :
𝓟 t = comap (↑) (𝓟 (((↑) : s → α) '' t)) := by
rw [comap_principal, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.coe_injective]
#align principal_subtype Filter.principal_subtype
@[simp]
theorem comap_pure {b : β} : comap m (pure b) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [← principal_singleton, comap_principal]
#align filter.comap_pure Filter.comap_pure
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map m f ≤ g ↔ f ≤ comap m g :=
⟨fun h _ ⟨_, ht, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset (h ht) hts, fun h _ ht => h ⟨_, ht, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.map_le_iff_le_comap Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (m : α → β) : GaloisConnection (map m) (comap m) :=
fun _ _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
#align filter.gc_map_comap Filter.gc_map_comap
theorem comap_le_iff_le_kernMap : comap m g ≤ f ↔ g ≤ kernMap m f := by
simp [Filter.le_def, mem_comap'', mem_kernMap, -mem_comap]
theorem gc_comap_kernMap (m : α → β) : GaloisConnection (comap m) (kernMap m) :=
fun _ _ ↦ comap_le_iff_le_kernMap
theorem kernMap_principal {s : Set α} : kernMap m (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (kernImage m s) := by
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (fun g ↦ ?_)
rw [← comap_le_iff_le_kernMap, le_principal_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_comap'']
@[mono]
theorem map_mono : Monotone (map m) :=
(gc_map_comap m).monotone_l
#align filter.map_mono Filter.map_mono
@[mono]
theorem comap_mono : Monotone (comap m) :=
(gc_map_comap m).monotone_u
#align filter.comap_mono Filter.comap_mono
/-- Temporary lemma that we can tag with `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr, deprecated] theorem map_le_map (h : F ≤ G) : map m F ≤ map m G := map_mono h
/-- Temporary lemma that we can tag with `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr, deprecated] theorem comap_le_comap (h : F ≤ G) : comap m F ≤ comap m G := comap_mono h
@[simp] theorem map_bot : map m ⊥ = ⊥ := (gc_map_comap m).l_bot
#align filter.map_bot Filter.map_bot
@[simp] theorem map_sup : map m (f₁ ⊔ f₂) = map m f₁ ⊔ map m f₂ := (gc_map_comap m).l_sup
#align filter.map_sup Filter.map_sup
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {f : ι → Filter α} : map m (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, map m (f i) :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_iSup
#align filter.map_supr Filter.map_iSup
@[simp]
theorem map_top (f : α → β) : map f ⊤ = 𝓟 (range f) := by
rw [← principal_univ, map_principal, image_univ]
#align filter.map_top Filter.map_top
@[simp] theorem comap_top : comap m ⊤ = ⊤ := (gc_map_comap m).u_top
#align filter.comap_top Filter.comap_top
@[simp] theorem comap_inf : comap m (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊓ comap m g₂ := (gc_map_comap m).u_inf
#align filter.comap_inf Filter.comap_inf
@[simp]
theorem comap_iInf {f : ι → Filter β} : comap m (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, comap m (f i) :=
(gc_map_comap m).u_iInf
#align filter.comap_infi Filter.comap_iInf
theorem le_comap_top (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) : l ≤ comap f ⊤ := by
rw [comap_top]
exact le_top
#align filter.le_comap_top Filter.le_comap_top
theorem map_comap_le : map m (comap m g) ≤ g :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_u_le _
#align filter.map_comap_le Filter.map_comap_le
theorem le_comap_map : f ≤ comap m (map m f) :=
(gc_map_comap m).le_u_l _
#align filter.le_comap_map Filter.le_comap_map
@[simp]
theorem comap_bot : comap m ⊥ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp only [empty_subset, preimage_empty]⟩
#align filter.comap_bot Filter.comap_bot
theorem neBot_of_comap (h : (comap m g).NeBot) : g.NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff] at *
contrapose! h
rw [h]
exact comap_bot
#align filter.ne_bot_of_comap Filter.neBot_of_comap
theorem comap_inf_principal_range : comap m (g ⊓ 𝓟 (range m)) = comap m g := by
simp
#align filter.comap_inf_principal_range Filter.comap_inf_principal_range
theorem disjoint_comap (h : Disjoint g₁ g₂) : Disjoint (comap m g₁) (comap m g₂) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← comap_inf, h.eq_bot, comap_bot]
#align filter.disjoint_comap Filter.disjoint_comap
theorem comap_iSup {ι} {f : ι → Filter β} {m : α → β} : comap m (iSup f) = ⨆ i, comap m (f i) :=
(gc_comap_kernMap m).l_iSup
#align filter.comap_supr Filter.comap_iSup
theorem comap_sSup {s : Set (Filter β)} {m : α → β} : comap m (sSup s) = ⨆ f ∈ s, comap m f := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, comap_iSup, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.comap_Sup Filter.comap_sSup
theorem comap_sup : comap m (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊔ comap m g₂ := by
rw [sup_eq_iSup, comap_iSup, iSup_bool_eq, Bool.cond_true, Bool.cond_false]
#align filter.comap_sup Filter.comap_sup
theorem map_comap (f : Filter β) (m : α → β) : (f.comap m).map m = f ⊓ 𝓟 (range m) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_inf map_comap_le <| le_principal_iff.2 range_mem_map) ?_
rintro t' ⟨t, ht, sub⟩
refine mem_inf_principal.2 (mem_of_superset ht ?_)
rintro _ hxt ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact sub hxt
#align filter.map_comap Filter.map_comap
theorem map_comap_setCoe_val (f : Filter β) (s : Set β) :
(f.comap ((↑) : s → β)).map (↑) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
rw [map_comap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_comap_of_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) : (f.comap m).map m = f := by
rw [map_comap, inf_eq_left.2 (le_principal_iff.2 hf)]
#align filter.map_comap_of_mem Filter.map_comap_of_mem
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Filter α) (Filter β) (map c) fun f => ∀ᶠ x : α in f, p x where
prf f hf := ⟨comap c f, map_comap_of_mem <| hf.mono CanLift.prf⟩
#align filter.can_lift Filter.canLift
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f g : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) :
comap m f ≤ comap m g ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨fun h => map_comap_of_mem hf ▸ (map_mono h).trans map_comap_le, fun h => comap_mono h⟩
#align filter.comap_le_comap_iff Filter.comap_le_comap_iff
theorem map_comap_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (l : Filter β) :
map f (comap f l) = l :=
map_comap_of_mem <| by simp only [hf.range_eq, univ_mem]
#align filter.map_comap_of_surjective Filter.map_comap_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (comap f) :=
LeftInverse.injective <| map_comap_of_surjective hf
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.filter_map_top {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(congr_arg _ comap_top).symm.trans <| map_comap_of_surjective hf ⊤
#align function.surjective.filter_map_top Function.Surjective.filter_map_top
theorem subtype_coe_map_comap (s : Set α) (f : Filter α) :
map ((↑) : s → α) (comap ((↑) : s → α) f) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s := by rw [map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
#align filter.subtype_coe_map_comap Filter.subtype_coe_map_comap
theorem image_mem_of_mem_comap {f : Filter α} {c : β → α} (h : range c ∈ f) {W : Set β}
(W_in : W ∈ comap c f) : c '' W ∈ f := by
rw [← map_comap_of_mem h]
exact image_mem_map W_in
#align filter.image_mem_of_mem_comap Filter.image_mem_of_mem_comap
theorem image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap {f : Filter α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ f) {W : Set U}
(W_in : W ∈ comap ((↑) : U → α) f) : (↑) '' W ∈ f :=
image_mem_of_mem_comap (by simp [h]) W_in
#align filter.image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap Filter.image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap
theorem comap_map {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (h : Injective m) : comap m (map m f) = f :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
mem_of_superset (preimage_mem_comap <| image_mem_map hs) <| by
simp only [preimage_image_eq s h, Subset.rfl])
le_comap_map
#align filter.comap_map Filter.comap_map
theorem mem_comap_iff {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (inj : Injective m) (large : Set.range m ∈ f)
{S : Set α} : S ∈ comap m f ↔ m '' S ∈ f := by
rw [← image_mem_map_iff inj, map_comap_of_mem large]
#align filter.mem_comap_iff Filter.mem_comap_iff
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injOn {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : s ∈ l₁)
(h₂ : s ∈ l₂) (hinj : InjOn f s) : map f l₁ ≤ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂ :=
⟨fun h _t ht =>
mp_mem h₁ <|
mem_of_superset (h <| image_mem_map (inter_mem h₂ ht)) fun _y ⟨_x, ⟨hxs, hxt⟩, hxy⟩ hys =>
hinj hxs hys hxy ▸ hxt,
fun h => map_mono h⟩
#align filter.map_le_map_iff_of_inj_on Filter.map_le_map_iff_of_injOn
theorem map_le_map_iff {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) :
map m f ≤ map m g ↔ f ≤ g := by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map hm]
#align filter.map_le_map_iff Filter.map_le_map_iff
theorem map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} {s : Set α} (hsf : s ∈ f) (hsg : s ∈ g)
(hm : InjOn m s) : map m f = map m g ↔ f = g := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, map_le_map_iff_of_injOn hsf hsg hm,
map_le_map_iff_of_injOn hsg hsf hm]
#align filter.map_eq_map_iff_of_inj_on Filter.map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn
theorem map_inj {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) : map m f = map m g ↔ f = g :=
map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn univ_mem univ_mem hm.injOn
#align filter.map_inj Filter.map_inj
theorem map_injective {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) : Injective (map m) := fun _ _ =>
(map_inj hm).1
#align filter.map_injective Filter.map_injective
theorem comap_neBot_iff {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} : NeBot (comap m f) ↔ ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t := by
simp only [← forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot, mem_comap, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
exact ⟨fun h t t_in => h (m ⁻¹' t) t t_in Subset.rfl, fun h s t ht hst => (h t ht).imp hst⟩
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_neBot_iff
theorem comap_neBot {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t) : NeBot (comap m f) :=
comap_neBot_iff.mpr hm
#align filter.comap_ne_bot Filter.comap_neBot
theorem comap_neBot_iff_frequently {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} :
NeBot (comap m f) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in f, y ∈ range m := by
simp only [comap_neBot_iff, frequently_iff, mem_range, @and_comm (_ ∈ _), exists_exists_eq_and]
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently Filter.comap_neBot_iff_frequently
theorem comap_neBot_iff_compl_range {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} :
NeBot (comap m f) ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∉ f :=
comap_neBot_iff_frequently
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff_compl_range Filter.comap_neBot_iff_compl_range
theorem comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} : comap m f = ⊥ ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∈ f :=
not_iff_not.mp <| neBot_iff.symm.trans comap_neBot_iff_compl_range
#align filter.comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range Filter.comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range
theorem comap_surjective_eq_bot {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : Surjective m) :
comap m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ := by
rw [comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range, hm.range_eq, compl_univ, empty_mem_iff_bot]
#align filter.comap_surjective_eq_bot Filter.comap_surjective_eq_bot
theorem disjoint_comap_iff (h : Surjective m) :
Disjoint (comap m g₁) (comap m g₂) ↔ Disjoint g₁ g₂ := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← comap_inf, comap_surjective_eq_bot h]
#align filter.disjoint_comap_iff Filter.disjoint_comap_iff
theorem NeBot.comap_of_range_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (_ : NeBot f) (hm : range m ∈ f) :
NeBot (comap m f) :=
comap_neBot_iff_frequently.2 <| Eventually.frequently hm
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_range_mem Filter.NeBot.comap_of_range_mem
@[simp]
theorem comap_fst_neBot_iff {f : Filter α} :
(f.comap (Prod.fst : α × β → α)).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ Nonempty β := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; simp [*]
· simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, *]
#align filter.comap_fst_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_fst_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_fst_neBot [Nonempty β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] :
(f.comap (Prod.fst : α × β → α)).NeBot :=
comap_fst_neBot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
#align filter.comap_fst_ne_bot Filter.comap_fst_neBot
@[simp]
theorem comap_snd_neBot_iff {f : Filter β} :
(f.comap (Prod.snd : α × β → β)).NeBot ↔ Nonempty α ∧ f.NeBot := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; simp
· simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, hα]
#align filter.comap_snd_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_snd_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_snd_neBot [Nonempty α] {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] :
(f.comap (Prod.snd : α × β → β)).NeBot :=
comap_snd_neBot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
#align filter.comap_snd_ne_bot Filter.comap_snd_neBot
theorem comap_eval_neBot_iff' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {i : ι} {f : Filter (α i)} :
(comap (eval i) f).NeBot ↔ (∀ j, Nonempty (α j)) ∧ NeBot f := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty (∀ j, α j) with H H
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]
simp [← Classical.nonempty_pi]
· have : ∀ j, Nonempty (α j) := Classical.nonempty_pi.1 H
simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, *]
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot_iff' Filter.comap_eval_neBot_iff'
@[simp]
theorem comap_eval_neBot_iff {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, Nonempty (α j)] {i : ι}
{f : Filter (α i)} : (comap (eval i) f).NeBot ↔ NeBot f := by simp [comap_eval_neBot_iff', *]
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_eval_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_eval_neBot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, Nonempty (α j)] (i : ι)
(f : Filter (α i)) [NeBot f] : (comap (eval i) f).NeBot :=
comap_eval_neBot_iff.2 ‹_›
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot Filter.comap_eval_neBot
theorem comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α}
(hs : m '' s ∈ f) : NeBot (comap m f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := by
refine ⟨compl_compl s ▸ mt mem_of_eq_bot ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
rcases hf.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hs ht) with ⟨_, ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩, hxt⟩
exact absurd hxs (hts hxt)
#align filter.comap_inf_principal_ne_bot_of_image_mem Filter.comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem
theorem comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal {s : Set γ} {l : Filter γ} [h : NeBot l] (h' : l ≤ 𝓟 s) :
NeBot (comap ((↑) : s → γ) l) :=
h.comap_of_range_mem <| (@Subtype.range_coe γ s).symm ▸ h' (mem_principal_self s)
#align filter.comap_coe_ne_bot_of_le_principal Filter.comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal
theorem NeBot.comap_of_surj {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) (hm : Surjective m) :
NeBot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem <| univ_mem' hm
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_surj Filter.NeBot.comap_of_surj
theorem NeBot.comap_of_image_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α}
(hs : m '' s ∈ f) : NeBot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem <| mem_of_superset hs (image_subset_range _ _)
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_image_mem Filter.NeBot.comap_of_image_mem
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff : map m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot]
exact id, fun h => by simp only [h, map_bot]⟩
#align filter.map_eq_bot_iff Filter.map_eq_bot_iff
theorem map_neBot_iff (f : α → β) {F : Filter α} : NeBot (map f F) ↔ NeBot F := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.map_ne_bot_iff Filter.map_neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.map (hf : NeBot f) (m : α → β) : NeBot (map m f) :=
(map_neBot_iff m).2 hf
#align filter.ne_bot.map Filter.NeBot.map
theorem NeBot.of_map : NeBot (f.map m) → NeBot f :=
(map_neBot_iff m).1
#align filter.ne_bot.of_map Filter.NeBot.of_map
instance map_neBot [hf : NeBot f] : NeBot (f.map m) :=
hf.map m
#align filter.map_ne_bot Filter.map_neBot
theorem sInter_comap_sets (f : α → β) (F : Filter β) : ⋂₀ (comap f F).sets = ⋂ U ∈ F, f ⁻¹' U := by
ext x
suffices (∀ (A : Set α) (B : Set β), B ∈ F → f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A → x ∈ A) ↔
∀ B : Set β, B ∈ F → f x ∈ B by
simp only [mem_sInter, mem_iInter, Filter.mem_sets, mem_comap, this, and_imp, exists_prop,
mem_preimage, exists_imp]
constructor
· intro h U U_in
simpa only [Subset.rfl, forall_prop_of_true, mem_preimage] using h (f ⁻¹' U) U U_in
· intro h V U U_in f_U_V
exact f_U_V (h U U_in)
#align filter.sInter_comap_sets Filter.sInter_comap_sets
end Map
-- this is a generic rule for monotone functions:
theorem map_iInf_le {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (iInf f) ≤ ⨅ i, map m (f i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => map_mono <| iInf_le _ _
#align filter.map_infi_le Filter.map_iInf_le
theorem map_iInf_eq {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] :
map m (iInf f) = ⨅ i, map m (f i) :=
map_iInf_le.antisymm fun s (hs : m ⁻¹' s ∈ iInf f) =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := (mem_iInf_of_directed hf _).1 hs
have : ⨅ i, map m (f i) ≤ 𝓟 s :=
iInf_le_of_le i <| by simpa only [le_principal_iff, mem_map]
Filter.le_principal_iff.1 this
#align filter.map_infi_eq Filter.map_iInf_eq
theorem map_biInf_eq {ι : Type w} {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} {p : ι → Prop}
(h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) { x | p x }) (ne : ∃ i, p i) :
map m (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), map m (f i) := by
haveI := nonempty_subtype.2 ne
simp only [iInf_subtype']
exact map_iInf_eq h.directed_val
#align filter.map_binfi_eq Filter.map_biInf_eq
theorem map_inf_le {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (f ⊓ g) ≤ map m f ⊓ map m g :=
(@map_mono _ _ m).map_inf_le f g
#align filter.map_inf_le Filter.map_inf_le
theorem map_inf {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (h : Injective m) :
map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g := by
refine map_inf_le.antisymm ?_
rintro t ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, ht : m ⁻¹' t = s₁ ∩ s₂⟩
refine mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂) ?_
rw [← image_inter h, image_subset_iff, ht]
#align filter.map_inf Filter.map_inf
theorem map_inf' {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} {t : Set α} (htf : t ∈ f) (htg : t ∈ g)
(h : InjOn m t) : map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g := by
lift f to Filter t using htf; lift g to Filter t using htg
replace h : Injective (m ∘ ((↑) : t → α)) := h.injective
simp only [map_map, ← map_inf Subtype.coe_injective, map_inf h]
#align filter.map_inf' Filter.map_inf'
lemma disjoint_of_map {α β : Type*} {F G : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : Disjoint (map f F) (map f G)) : Disjoint F G :=
disjoint_iff.mpr <| map_eq_bot_iff.mp <| le_bot_iff.mp <| trans map_inf_le (disjoint_iff.mp h)
theorem disjoint_map {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} :
Disjoint (map m f₁) (map m f₂) ↔ Disjoint f₁ f₂ := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← map_inf hm, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.disjoint_map Filter.disjoint_map
theorem map_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : Filter β) : map e.symm f = comap e f :=
map_injective e.injective <| by
rw [map_map, e.self_comp_symm, map_id, map_comap_of_surjective e.surjective]
#align filter.map_equiv_symm Filter.map_equiv_symm
theorem map_eq_comap_of_inverse {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {n : β → α} (h₁ : m ∘ n = id)
(h₂ : n ∘ m = id) : map m f = comap n f :=
map_equiv_symm ⟨n, m, congr_fun h₁, congr_fun h₂⟩ f
#align filter.map_eq_comap_of_inverse Filter.map_eq_comap_of_inverse
theorem comap_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : Filter α) : comap e.symm f = map e f :=
(map_eq_comap_of_inverse e.self_comp_symm e.symm_comp_self).symm
#align filter.comap_equiv_symm Filter.comap_equiv_symm
theorem map_swap_eq_comap_swap {f : Filter (α × β)} : Prod.swap <$> f = comap Prod.swap f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse Prod.swap_swap_eq Prod.swap_swap_eq
#align filter.map_swap_eq_comap_swap Filter.map_swap_eq_comap_swap
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_eq_comap {f : Filter ((α × β) × γ × δ)} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) f =
comap (fun p : (α × γ) × β × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse (funext fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl) (funext fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl)
#align filter.map_swap4_eq_comap Filter.map_swap4_eq_comap
theorem le_map {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {g : Filter β} (h : ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g) : g ≤ f.map m :=
fun _ hs => mem_of_superset (h _ hs) <| image_preimage_subset _ _
#align filter.le_map Filter.le_map
theorem le_map_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {g : Filter β} : g ≤ f.map m ↔ ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g :=
⟨fun h _ hs => h (image_mem_map hs), le_map⟩
#align filter.le_map_iff Filter.le_map_iff
protected theorem push_pull (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) = map f F ⊓ G := by
apply le_antisymm
· calc
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) ≤ map f F ⊓ (map f <| comap f G) := map_inf_le
_ ≤ map f F ⊓ G := inf_le_inf_left (map f F) map_comap_le
· rintro U ⟨V, V_in, W, ⟨Z, Z_in, hZ⟩, h⟩
apply mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map V_in) Z_in
calc
f '' V ∩ Z = f '' (V ∩ f ⁻¹' Z) := by rw [image_inter_preimage]
_ ⊆ f '' (V ∩ W) := image_subset _ (inter_subset_inter_right _ ‹_›)
_ = f '' (f ⁻¹' U) := by rw [h]
_ ⊆ U := image_preimage_subset f U
#align filter.push_pull Filter.push_pull
protected theorem push_pull' (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
map f (comap f G ⊓ F) = G ⊓ map f F := by simp only [Filter.push_pull, inf_comm]
#align filter.push_pull' Filter.push_pull'
theorem principal_eq_map_coe_top (s : Set α) : 𝓟 s = map ((↑) : s → α) ⊤ := by simp
#align filter.principal_eq_map_coe_top Filter.principal_eq_map_coe_top
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
F ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ comap ((↑) : s → α) F = ⊥ := by
rw [principal_eq_map_coe_top s, ← Filter.push_pull', inf_top_eq, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap
section Applicative
theorem singleton_mem_pure {a : α} : {a} ∈ (pure a : Filter α) :=
mem_singleton a
#align filter.singleton_mem_pure Filter.singleton_mem_pure
theorem pure_injective : Injective (pure : α → Filter α) := fun a _ hab =>
(Filter.ext_iff.1 hab { x | a = x }).1 rfl
#align filter.pure_injective Filter.pure_injective
instance pure_neBot {α : Type u} {a : α} : NeBot (pure a) :=
⟨mt empty_mem_iff_bot.2 <| not_mem_empty a⟩
#align filter.pure_ne_bot Filter.pure_neBot
@[simp]
theorem le_pure_iff {f : Filter α} {a : α} : f ≤ pure a ↔ {a} ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_singleton, le_principal_iff]
#align filter.le_pure_iff Filter.le_pure_iff
theorem mem_seq_def {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, (x : α → β) y ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_seq_def Filter.mem_seq_def
theorem mem_seq_iff {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Set.seq u t ⊆ s := by
simp only [mem_seq_def, seq_subset, exists_prop, iff_self_iff]
#align filter.mem_seq_iff Filter.mem_seq_iff
theorem mem_map_seq_iff {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {m : α → β → γ} {s : Set γ} :
s ∈ (f.map m).seq g ↔ ∃ t u, t ∈ g ∧ u ∈ f ∧ ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, m x y ∈ s :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hts⟩ => ⟨s, m ⁻¹' t, hs, ht, fun _ => hts _⟩)
fun ⟨t, s, ht, hs, hts⟩ =>
⟨m '' s, image_mem_map hs, t, ht, fun _ ⟨_, has, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ hts _ has⟩
#align filter.mem_map_seq_iff Filter.mem_map_seq_iff
theorem seq_mem_seq {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : s.seq t ∈ f.seq g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun f hf a ha => ⟨f, hf, a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.seq_mem_seq Filter.seq_mem_seq
theorem le_seq {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {h : Filter β}
(hh : ∀ t ∈ f, ∀ u ∈ g, Set.seq t u ∈ h) : h ≤ seq f g := fun _ ⟨_, ht, _, hu, hs⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hh _ ht _ hu) fun _ ⟨_, hm, _, ha, eq⟩ => eq ▸ hs _ hm _ ha
#align filter.le_seq Filter.le_seq
@[mono]
theorem seq_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (α → β)} {g₁ g₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.seq g₁ ≤ f₂.seq g₂ :=
le_seq fun _ hs _ ht => seq_mem_seq (hf hs) (hg ht)
#align filter.seq_mono Filter.seq_mono
@[simp]
theorem pure_seq_eq_map (g : α → β) (f : Filter α) : seq (pure g) f = f.map g := by
refine le_antisymm (le_map fun s hs => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rw [← singleton_seq]
apply seq_mem_seq _ hs
exact singleton_mem_pure
· refine sets_of_superset (map g f) (image_mem_map ht) ?_
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩
#align filter.pure_seq_eq_map Filter.pure_seq_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem seq_pure (f : Filter (α → β)) (a : α) : seq f (pure a) = map (fun g : α → β => g a) f := by
refine le_antisymm (le_map fun s hs => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rw [← seq_singleton]
exact seq_mem_seq hs singleton_mem_pure
· refine sets_of_superset (map (fun g : α → β => g a) f) (image_mem_map hs) ?_
rintro b ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hg, a, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.seq_pure Filter.seq_pure
@[simp]
theorem seq_assoc (x : Filter α) (g : Filter (α → β)) (h : Filter (β → γ)) :
seq h (seq g x) = seq (seq (map (· ∘ ·) h) g) x := by
refine le_antisymm (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rcases mem_seq_iff.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, hs⟩
rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hu with ⟨w, hw, hu⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono ((Set.seq_mono hu Subset.rfl).trans hs) Subset.rfl)
rw [← Set.seq_seq]
exact seq_mem_seq hw (seq_mem_seq hv ht)
· rcases mem_seq_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, ht⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono Subset.rfl ht)
rw [Set.seq_seq]
exact seq_mem_seq (seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map hs) hu) hv
#align filter.seq_assoc Filter.seq_assoc
theorem prod_map_seq_comm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
(map Prod.mk f).seq g = seq (map (fun b a => (a, b)) g) f := by
refine le_antisymm (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono hs Subset.rfl)
rw [← Set.prod_image_seq_comm]
exact seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map ht) hu
· rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono hs Subset.rfl)
rw [Set.prod_image_seq_comm]
exact seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map ht) hu
#align filter.prod_map_seq_comm Filter.prod_map_seq_comm
theorem seq_eq_filter_seq {α β : Type u} (f : Filter (α → β)) (g : Filter α) :
f <*> g = seq f g :=
rfl
#align filter.seq_eq_filter_seq Filter.seq_eq_filter_seq
instance : LawfulApplicative (Filter : Type u → Type u) where
map_pure := map_pure
seqLeft_eq _ _ := rfl
seqRight_eq _ _ := rfl
seq_pure := seq_pure
pure_seq := pure_seq_eq_map
seq_assoc := seq_assoc
instance : CommApplicative (Filter : Type u → Type u) :=
⟨fun f g => prod_map_seq_comm f g⟩
end Applicative
/-! #### `bind` equations -/
section Bind
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bind {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in bind f m, p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ᶠ y in m x, p y :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_bind Filter.eventually_bind
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_bind {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ =ᶠ[bind f m] g₂ ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, g₁ =ᶠ[m x] g₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq_bind Filter.eventuallyEq_bind
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyLE_bind [LE γ] {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ ≤ᶠ[bind f m] g₂ ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, g₁ ≤ᶠ[m x] g₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_le_bind Filter.eventuallyLE_bind
theorem mem_bind' {s : Set β} {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} :
s ∈ bind f m ↔ { a | s ∈ m a } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_bind' Filter.mem_bind'
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {s : Set β} {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} :
s ∈ bind f m ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, s ∈ m x :=
calc
s ∈ bind f m ↔ { a | s ∈ m a } ∈ f := Iff.rfl
_ ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ { a | s ∈ m a } := exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
_ ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, s ∈ m x := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_bind Filter.mem_bind
theorem bind_le {f : Filter α} {g : α → Filter β} {l : Filter β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, g x ≤ l) :
f.bind g ≤ l :=
join_le <| eventually_map.2 h
#align filter.bind_le Filter.bind_le
@[mono]
theorem bind_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : α → Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[f₁] g₂) :
bind f₁ g₁ ≤ bind f₂ g₂ := by
refine le_trans (fun s hs => ?_) (join_mono <| map_mono hf)
simp only [mem_join, mem_bind', mem_map] at hs ⊢
filter_upwards [hg, hs] with _ hx hs using hx hs
#align filter.bind_mono Filter.bind_mono
theorem bind_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {g : α → Filter β} {s : Set β} :
(f.bind fun x => g x ⊓ 𝓟 s) = f.bind g ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
Filter.ext fun s => by simp only [mem_bind, mem_inf_principal]
#align filter.bind_inf_principal Filter.bind_inf_principal
theorem sup_bind {f g : Filter α} {h : α → Filter β} : bind (f ⊔ g) h = bind f h ⊔ bind g h := rfl
#align filter.sup_bind Filter.sup_bind
theorem principal_bind {s : Set α} {f : α → Filter β} : bind (𝓟 s) f = ⨆ x ∈ s, f x :=
show join (map f (𝓟 s)) = ⨆ x ∈ s, f x by
simp only [sSup_image, join_principal_eq_sSup, map_principal, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.principal_bind Filter.principal_bind
end Bind
/-! ### Limits -/
/-- `Filter.Tendsto` is the generic "limit of a function" predicate.
`Tendsto f l₁ l₂` asserts that for every `l₂` neighborhood `a`,
the `f`-preimage of `a` is an `l₁` neighborhood. -/
def Tendsto (f : α → β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :=
l₁.map f ≤ l₂
#align filter.tendsto Filter.Tendsto
theorem tendsto_def {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, f ⁻¹' s ∈ l₁ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_def Filter.tendsto_def
theorem tendsto_iff_eventually {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃p : β → Prop⦄, (∀ᶠ y in l₂, p y) → ∀ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_iff_eventually Filter.tendsto_iff_eventually
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, ∀ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem Filter.tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem
lemma Tendsto.eventually_mem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {s : Set β}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : s ∈ l₂) : ∀ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∈ s :=
hf h
theorem Tendsto.eventually {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : β → Prop}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : ∀ᶠ y in l₂, p y) : ∀ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x) :=
hf h
#align filter.tendsto.eventually Filter.Tendsto.eventually
theorem not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
¬Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∃ s ∈ l₂, ∃ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∉ s := by
simp only [tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem, not_forall, exists_prop, not_eventually]
#align filter.not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem Filter.not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem
theorem Tendsto.frequently {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : β → Prop}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : ∃ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x)) : ∃ᶠ y in l₂, p y :=
mt hf.eventually h
#align filter.tendsto.frequently Filter.Tendsto.frequently
theorem Tendsto.frequently_map {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(f : α → β) (c : Filter.Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (w : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) (h : ∃ᶠ x in l₁, p x) :
∃ᶠ y in l₂, q y :=
c.frequently (h.mono w)
#align filter.tendsto.frequently_map Filter.Tendsto.frequently_map
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_bot {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} : Tendsto f ⊥ l := by simp [Tendsto]
#align filter.tendsto_bot Filter.tendsto_bot
@[simp] theorem tendsto_top {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} : Tendsto f l ⊤ := le_top
#align filter.tendsto_top Filter.tendsto_top
theorem le_map_of_right_inverse {mab : α → β} {mba : β → α} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
(h₁ : mab ∘ mba =ᶠ[g] id) (h₂ : Tendsto mba g f) : g ≤ map mab f := by
rw [← @map_id _ g, ← map_congr h₁, ← map_map]
exact map_mono h₂
#align filter.le_map_of_right_inverse Filter.le_map_of_right_inverse
theorem tendsto_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {f : α → β} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} :
Tendsto f la lb := by simp only [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty la, tendsto_bot]
#align filter.tendsto_of_is_empty Filter.tendsto_of_isEmpty
theorem eventuallyEq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} {fa : Filter α}
{fb : Filter β} (hleft : ∀ᶠ x in fa, g₁ (f x) = x) (hright : ∀ᶠ y in fb, f (g₂ y) = y)
(htendsto : Tendsto g₂ fb fa) : g₁ =ᶠ[fb] g₂ :=
(htendsto.eventually hleft).mp <| hright.mono fun _ hr hl => (congr_arg g₁ hr.symm).trans hl
#align filter.eventually_eq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv Filter.eventuallyEq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv
theorem tendsto_iff_comap {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂.comap f :=
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align filter.tendsto_iff_comap Filter.tendsto_iff_comap
alias ⟨Tendsto.le_comap, _⟩ := tendsto_iff_comap
#align filter.tendsto.le_comap Filter.Tendsto.le_comap
protected theorem Tendsto.disjoint {f : α → β} {la₁ la₂ : Filter α} {lb₁ lb₂ : Filter β}
(h₁ : Tendsto f la₁ lb₁) (hd : Disjoint lb₁ lb₂) (h₂ : Tendsto f la₂ lb₂) : Disjoint la₁ la₂ :=
(disjoint_comap hd).mono h₁.le_comap h₂.le_comap
#align filter.tendsto.disjoint Filter.Tendsto.disjoint
theorem tendsto_congr' {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (hl : f₁ =ᶠ[l₁] f₂) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ ↔ Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ := by rw [Tendsto, Tendsto, map_congr hl]
#align filter.tendsto_congr' Filter.tendsto_congr'
theorem Tendsto.congr' {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (hl : f₁ =ᶠ[l₁] f₂)
(h : Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂) : Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_congr' hl).1 h
#align filter.tendsto.congr' Filter.Tendsto.congr'
theorem tendsto_congr {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ ↔ Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
tendsto_congr' (univ_mem' h)
#align filter.tendsto_congr Filter.tendsto_congr
theorem Tendsto.congr {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ → Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_congr h).1
#align filter.tendsto.congr Filter.Tendsto.congr
theorem tendsto_id' {x y : Filter α} : Tendsto id x y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_id' Filter.tendsto_id'
theorem tendsto_id {x : Filter α} : Tendsto id x x :=
le_refl x
#align filter.tendsto_id Filter.tendsto_id
theorem Tendsto.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} {z : Filter γ}
(hg : Tendsto g y z) (hf : Tendsto f x y) : Tendsto (g ∘ f) x z := fun _ hs => hf (hg hs)
#align filter.tendsto.comp Filter.Tendsto.comp
protected theorem Tendsto.iterate {f : α → α} {l : Filter α} (h : Tendsto f l l) :
∀ n, Tendsto (f^[n]) l l
| 0 => tendsto_id
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
theorem Tendsto.mono_left {f : α → β} {x y : Filter α} {z : Filter β} (hx : Tendsto f x z)
(h : y ≤ x) : Tendsto f y z :=
(map_mono h).trans hx
#align filter.tendsto.mono_left Filter.Tendsto.mono_left
theorem Tendsto.mono_right {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y z : Filter β} (hy : Tendsto f x y)
(hz : y ≤ z) : Tendsto f x z :=
le_trans hy hz
#align filter.tendsto.mono_right Filter.Tendsto.mono_right
theorem Tendsto.neBot {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} (h : Tendsto f x y) [hx : NeBot x] :
NeBot y :=
(hx.map _).mono h
#align filter.tendsto.ne_bot Filter.Tendsto.neBot
theorem tendsto_map {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} : Tendsto f x (map f x) :=
le_refl (map f x)
#align filter.tendsto_map Filter.tendsto_map
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 3,145 | 3,147 | theorem tendsto_map'_iff {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f (map g x) y ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ g) x y := by |
rw [Tendsto, Tendsto, map_map]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Cat
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Basic
#align_import category_theory.category.Cat.limit from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1995c7bbdbb0adb1b6d5acdc654f6cf46ed96cfa"
/-!
# The category of small categories has all small limits.
An object in the limit consists of a family of objects,
which are carried to one another by the functors in the diagram.
A morphism between two such objects is a family of morphisms between the corresponding objects,
which are carried to one another by the action on morphisms of the functors in the diagram.
## Future work
Can the indexing category live in a lower universe?
-/
noncomputable section
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J]
namespace Cat
namespace HasLimits
instance categoryObjects {F : J ⥤ Cat.{u, u}} {j} :
SmallCategory ((F ⋙ Cat.objects.{u, u}).obj j) :=
(F.obj j).str
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Cat.has_limits.category_objects CategoryTheory.Cat.HasLimits.categoryObjects
/-- Auxiliary definition:
the diagram whose limit gives the morphism space between two objects of the limit category. -/
@[simps]
def homDiagram {F : J ⥤ Cat.{v, v}} (X Y : limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects.{v, v})) : J ⥤ Type v where
obj j := limit.π (F ⋙ Cat.objects) j X ⟶ limit.π (F ⋙ Cat.objects) j Y
map f g := by
refine eqToHom ?_ ≫ (F.map f).map g ≫ eqToHom ?_
· exact (congr_fun (limit.w (F ⋙ Cat.objects) f) X).symm
· exact congr_fun (limit.w (F ⋙ Cat.objects) f) Y
map_id X := by
funext f
letI : Category (objects.obj (F.obj X)) := (inferInstance : Category (F.obj X))
simp [Functor.congr_hom (F.map_id X) f]
map_comp {_ _ Z} f g := by
funext h
letI : Category (objects.obj (F.obj Z)) := (inferInstance : Category (F.obj Z))
simp [Functor.congr_hom (F.map_comp f g) h, eqToHom_map]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Cat.has_limits.hom_diagram CategoryTheory.Cat.HasLimits.homDiagram
@[simps]
instance (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v, v}) : Category (limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects)) where
Hom X Y := limit (homDiagram X Y)
id X := Types.Limit.mk.{v, v} (homDiagram X X) (fun j => 𝟙 _) fun j j' f => by simp
comp {X Y Z} f g :=
Types.Limit.mk.{v, v} (homDiagram X Z)
(fun j => limit.π (homDiagram X Y) j f ≫ limit.π (homDiagram Y Z) j g) fun j j' h => by
simp [← congr_fun (limit.w (homDiagram X Y) h) f,
← congr_fun (limit.w (homDiagram Y Z) h) g]
id_comp _ := by
apply Types.limit_ext.{v, v}
aesop_cat
comp_id _ := by
apply Types.limit_ext.{v, v}
aesop_cat
/-- Auxiliary definition: the limit category. -/
@[simps]
def limitConeX (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v, v}) : Cat.{v, v} where α := limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Cat.has_limits.limit_cone_X CategoryTheory.Cat.HasLimits.limitConeX
/-- Auxiliary definition: the cone over the limit category. -/
@[simps]
def limitCone (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v, v}) : Cone F where
pt := limitConeX F
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
{ obj := limit.π (F ⋙ Cat.objects) j
map := fun f => limit.π (homDiagram _ _) j f }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
CategoryTheory.Functor.ext (fun X => (congr_fun (limit.w (F ⋙ Cat.objects) f) X).symm)
fun X Y h => (congr_fun (limit.w (homDiagram X Y) f) h).symm }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Cat.has_limits.limit_cone CategoryTheory.Cat.HasLimits.limitCone
/-- Auxiliary definition: the universal morphism to the proposed limit cone. -/
@[simps]
def limitConeLift (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v, v}) (s : Cone F) : s.pt ⟶ limitConeX F where
obj :=
limit.lift (F ⋙ Cat.objects)
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app := fun j => (s.π.app j).obj
naturality := fun _ _ f => objects.congr_map (s.π.naturality f) } }
map f := by
fapply Types.Limit.mk.{v, v}
· intro j
refine eqToHom ?_ ≫ (s.π.app j).map f ≫ eqToHom ?_ <;> simp
· intro j j' h
dsimp
simp only [Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp, eqToHom_map, eqToHom_trans,
eqToHom_trans_assoc, ← Functor.comp_map]
have := (s.π.naturality h).symm
dsimp at this
rw [Category.id_comp] at this
erw [Functor.congr_hom this f]
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Cat.has_limits.limit_cone_lift CategoryTheory.Cat.HasLimits.limitConeLift
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Category/Cat/Limit.lean | 127 | 132 | theorem limit_π_homDiagram_eqToHom {F : J ⥤ Cat.{v, v}} (X Y : limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects.{v, v}))
(j : J) (h : X = Y) :
limit.π (homDiagram X Y) j (eqToHom h) =
eqToHom (congr_arg (limit.π (F ⋙ Cat.objects.{v, v}) j) h) := by |
subst h
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.finite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Finite sets
This file defines predicates for finite and infinite sets and provides
`Fintype` instances for many set constructions. It also proves basic facts
about finite sets and gives ways to manipulate `Set.Finite` expressions.
## Main definitions
* `Set.Finite : Set α → Prop`
* `Set.Infinite : Set α → Prop`
* `Set.toFinite` to prove `Set.Finite` for a `Set` from a `Finite` instance.
* `Set.Finite.toFinset` to noncomputably produce a `Finset` from a `Set.Finite` proof.
(See `Set.toFinset` for a computable version.)
## Implementation
A finite set is defined to be a set whose coercion to a type has a `Finite` instance.
There are two components to finiteness constructions. The first is `Fintype` instances for each
construction. This gives a way to actually compute a `Finset` that represents the set, and these
may be accessed using `set.toFinset`. This gets the `Finset` in the correct form, since otherwise
`Finset.univ : Finset s` is a `Finset` for the subtype for `s`. The second component is
"constructors" for `Set.Finite` that give proofs that `Fintype` instances exist classically given
other `Set.Finite` proofs. Unlike the `Fintype` instances, these *do not* use any decidability
instances since they do not compute anything.
## Tags
finite sets
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedRing
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set Function
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace Set
/-- A set is finite if the corresponding `Subtype` is finite,
i.e., if there exists a natural `n : ℕ` and an equivalence `s ≃ Fin n`. -/
protected def Finite (s : Set α) : Prop := Finite s
#align set.finite Set.Finite
-- The `protected` attribute does not take effect within the same namespace block.
end Set
namespace Set
theorem finite_def {s : Set α} : s.Finite ↔ Nonempty (Fintype s) :=
finite_iff_nonempty_fintype s
#align set.finite_def Set.finite_def
protected alias ⟨Finite.nonempty_fintype, _⟩ := finite_def
#align set.finite.nonempty_fintype Set.Finite.nonempty_fintype
theorem finite_coe_iff {s : Set α} : Finite s ↔ s.Finite := .rfl
#align set.finite_coe_iff Set.finite_coe_iff
/-- Constructor for `Set.Finite` using a `Finite` instance. -/
theorem toFinite (s : Set α) [Finite s] : s.Finite := ‹_›
#align set.to_finite Set.toFinite
/-- Construct a `Finite` instance for a `Set` from a `Finset` with the same elements. -/
protected theorem Finite.ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) : p.Finite :=
have := Fintype.ofFinset s H; p.toFinite
#align set.finite.of_finset Set.Finite.ofFinset
/-- Projection of `Set.Finite` to its `Finite` instance.
This is intended to be used with dot notation.
See also `Set.Finite.Fintype` and `Set.Finite.nonempty_fintype`. -/
protected theorem Finite.to_subtype {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Finite s := h
#align set.finite.to_subtype Set.Finite.to_subtype
/-- A finite set coerced to a type is a `Fintype`.
This is the `Fintype` projection for a `Set.Finite`.
Note that because `Finite` isn't a typeclass, this definition will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
protected noncomputable def Finite.fintype {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Fintype s :=
h.nonempty_fintype.some
#align set.finite.fintype Set.Finite.fintype
/-- Using choice, get the `Finset` that represents this `Set`. -/
protected noncomputable def Finite.toFinset {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Finset α :=
@Set.toFinset _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset
theorem Finite.toFinset_eq_toFinset {s : Set α} [Fintype s] (h : s.Finite) :
h.toFinset = s.toFinset := by
-- Porting note: was `rw [Finite.toFinset]; congr`
-- in Lean 4, a goal is left after `congr`
have : h.fintype = ‹_› := Subsingleton.elim _ _
rw [Finite.toFinset, this]
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinite_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : s.toFinite.toFinset = s.toFinset :=
s.toFinite.toFinset_eq_toFinset
#align set.to_finite_to_finset Set.toFinite_toFinset
theorem Finite.exists_finset {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) :
∃ s' : Finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases h.nonempty_fintype
exact ⟨s.toFinset, fun _ => mem_toFinset⟩
#align set.finite.exists_finset Set.Finite.exists_finset
theorem Finite.exists_finset_coe {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : ∃ s' : Finset α, ↑s' = s := by
cases h.nonempty_fintype
exact ⟨s.toFinset, s.coe_toFinset⟩
#align set.finite.exists_finset_coe Set.Finite.exists_finset_coe
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Finset α) (↑) Set.Finite where prf _ hs := hs.exists_finset_coe
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite.
This is protected so that it does not conflict with global `Infinite`. -/
protected def Infinite (s : Set α) : Prop :=
¬s.Finite
#align set.infinite Set.Infinite
@[simp]
theorem not_infinite {s : Set α} : ¬s.Infinite ↔ s.Finite :=
not_not
#align set.not_infinite Set.not_infinite
alias ⟨_, Finite.not_infinite⟩ := not_infinite
#align set.finite.not_infinite Set.Finite.not_infinite
attribute [simp] Finite.not_infinite
/-- See also `finite_or_infinite`, `fintypeOrInfinite`. -/
protected theorem finite_or_infinite (s : Set α) : s.Finite ∨ s.Infinite :=
em _
#align set.finite_or_infinite Set.finite_or_infinite
protected theorem infinite_or_finite (s : Set α) : s.Infinite ∨ s.Finite :=
em' _
#align set.infinite_or_finite Set.infinite_or_finite
/-! ### Basic properties of `Set.Finite.toFinset` -/
namespace Finite
variable {s t : Set α} {a : α} (hs : s.Finite) {ht : t.Finite}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_toFinset : a ∈ hs.toFinset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype _
#align set.finite.mem_to_finset Set.Finite.mem_toFinset
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_toFinset : (hs.toFinset : Set α) = s :=
@coe_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype
#align set.finite.coe_to_finset Set.Finite.coe_toFinset
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_nonempty : hs.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Finset.coe_nonempty, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_nonempty Set.Finite.toFinset_nonempty
/-- Note that this is an equality of types not holding definitionally. Use wisely. -/
theorem coeSort_toFinset : ↥hs.toFinset = ↥s := by
rw [← Finset.coe_sort_coe _, hs.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.coe_sort_to_finset Set.Finite.coeSort_toFinset
/-- The identity map, bundled as an equivalence between the subtypes of `s : Set α` and of
`h.toFinset : Finset α`, where `h` is a proof of finiteness of `s`. -/
@[simps!] def subtypeEquivToFinset : {x // x ∈ s} ≃ {x // x ∈ hs.toFinset} :=
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv fun _ ↦ hs.mem_toFinset.symm
variable {hs}
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_inj : hs.toFinset = ht.toFinset ↔ s = t :=
@toFinset_inj _ _ _ hs.fintype ht.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_inj Set.Finite.toFinset_inj
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_subset {t : Finset α} : hs.toFinset ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_subset Set.Finite.toFinset_subset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_ssubset {t : Finset α} : hs.toFinset ⊂ t ↔ s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_ssubset Set.Finite.toFinset_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem subset_toFinset {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ht.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.subset_to_finset Set.Finite.subset_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_toFinset {s : Finset α} : s ⊂ ht.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.ssubset_to_finset Set.Finite.ssubset_toFinset
@[mono]
protected theorem toFinset_subset_toFinset : hs.toFinset ⊆ ht.toFinset ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_subset_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset
@[mono]
protected theorem toFinset_ssubset_toFinset : hs.toFinset ⊂ ht.toFinset ↔ s ⊂ t := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_ssubset_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
alias ⟨_, toFinset_mono⟩ := Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset
#align set.finite.to_finset_mono Set.Finite.toFinset_mono
alias ⟨_, toFinset_strictMono⟩ := Finite.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
#align set.finite.to_finset_strict_mono Set.Finite.toFinset_strictMono
-- Porting note: attribute [protected] doesn't work
-- attribute [protected] toFinset_mono toFinset_strictMono
-- Porting note: `simp` can simplify LHS but then it simplifies something
-- in the generated `Fintype {x | p x}` instance and fails to apply `Set.toFinset_setOf`
@[simp high]
protected theorem toFinset_setOf [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : { x | p x }.Finite) : h.toFinset = Finset.univ.filter p := by
ext
-- Porting note: `simp` doesn't use the `simp` lemma `Set.toFinset_setOf` without the `_`
simp [Set.toFinset_setOf _]
#align set.finite.to_finset_set_of Set.Finite.toFinset_setOf
@[simp]
nonrec theorem disjoint_toFinset {hs : s.Finite} {ht : t.Finite} :
Disjoint hs.toFinset ht.toFinset ↔ Disjoint s t :=
@disjoint_toFinset _ _ _ hs.fintype ht.fintype
#align set.finite.disjoint_to_finset Set.Finite.disjoint_toFinset
protected theorem toFinset_inter [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∩ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∩ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_inter Set.Finite.toFinset_inter
protected theorem toFinset_union [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∪ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∪ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_union Set.Finite.toFinset_union
protected theorem toFinset_diff [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s \ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset \ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_diff Set.Finite.toFinset_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
protected theorem toFinset_symmDiff [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∆ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∆ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp [mem_symmDiff, Finset.mem_symmDiff]
#align set.finite.to_finset_symm_diff Set.Finite.toFinset_symmDiff
protected theorem toFinset_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (hs : s.Finite) (h : sᶜ.Finite) :
h.toFinset = hs.toFinsetᶜ := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_compl Set.Finite.toFinset_compl
protected theorem toFinset_univ [Fintype α] (h : (Set.univ : Set α).Finite) :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ := by
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_univ Set.Finite.toFinset_univ
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_eq_empty {h : s.Finite} : h.toFinset = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
@toFinset_eq_empty _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_empty Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_empty
protected theorem toFinset_empty (h : (∅ : Set α).Finite) : h.toFinset = ∅ := by
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_empty Set.Finite.toFinset_empty
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_eq_univ [Fintype α] {h : s.Finite} :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ ↔ s = univ :=
@toFinset_eq_univ _ _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_univ Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_univ
protected theorem toFinset_image [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).Finite) :
h.toFinset = hs.toFinset.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_image Set.Finite.toFinset_image
-- Porting note (#10618): now `simp` can prove it but it needs the `fintypeRange` instance
-- from the next section
protected theorem toFinset_range [DecidableEq α] [Fintype β] (f : β → α) (h : (range f).Finite) :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_range Set.Finite.toFinset_range
end Finite
/-! ### Fintype instances
Every instance here should have a corresponding `Set.Finite` constructor in the next section.
-/
section FintypeInstances
instance fintypeUniv [Fintype α] : Fintype (@univ α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv α (Equiv.Set.univ α).symm
#align set.fintype_univ Set.fintypeUniv
/-- If `(Set.univ : Set α)` is finite then `α` is a finite type. -/
noncomputable def fintypeOfFiniteUniv (H : (univ (α := α)).Finite) : Fintype α :=
@Fintype.ofEquiv _ (univ : Set α) H.fintype (Equiv.Set.univ _)
#align set.fintype_of_finite_univ Set.fintypeOfFiniteUniv
instance fintypeUnion [DecidableEq α] (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ∪ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_union Set.fintypeUnion
instance fintypeSep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred p] :
Fintype ({ a ∈ s | p a } : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.filter p) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_sep Set.fintypeSep
instance fintypeInter (s t : Set α) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ∩ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_inter Set.fintypeInter
/-- A `Fintype` instance for set intersection where the left set has a `Fintype` instance. -/
instance fintypeInterOfLeft (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.filter (· ∈ t)) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_inter_of_left Set.fintypeInterOfLeft
/-- A `Fintype` instance for set intersection where the right set has a `Fintype` instance. -/
instance fintypeInterOfRight (s t : Set α) [Fintype t] [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (t.toFinset.filter (· ∈ s)) <| by simp [and_comm]
#align set.fintype_inter_of_right Set.fintypeInterOfRight
/-- A `Fintype` structure on a set defines a `Fintype` structure on its subset. -/
def fintypeSubset (s : Set α) {t : Set α} [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (h : t ⊆ s) :
Fintype t := by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
apply Set.fintypeInterOfLeft
#align set.fintype_subset Set.fintypeSubset
instance fintypeDiff [DecidableEq α] (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s \ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset \ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_diff Set.fintypeDiff
instance fintypeDiffLeft (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
Fintype (s \ t : Set α) :=
Set.fintypeSep s (· ∈ tᶜ)
#align set.fintype_diff_left Set.fintypeDiffLeft
instance fintypeiUnion [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (PLift ι)] (f : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Fintype (f i)] :
Fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.univ.biUnion fun i : PLift ι => (f i.down).toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_Union Set.fintypeiUnion
instance fintypesUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Set (Set α)} [Fintype s]
[H : ∀ t : s, Fintype (t : Set α)] : Fintype (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact @Set.fintypeiUnion _ _ _ _ _ H
#align set.fintype_sUnion Set.fintypesUnion
/-- A union of sets with `Fintype` structure over a set with `Fintype` structure has a `Fintype`
structure. -/
def fintypeBiUnion [DecidableEq α] {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Fintype s] (t : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ s, Fintype (t i)) : Fintype (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
haveI : ∀ i : toFinset s, Fintype (t i) := fun i => H i (mem_toFinset.1 i.2)
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.attach.biUnion fun x => (t x).toFinset) fun x => by simp
#align set.fintype_bUnion Set.fintypeBiUnion
instance fintypeBiUnion' [DecidableEq α] {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Fintype s] (t : ι → Set α)
[∀ i, Fintype (t i)] : Fintype (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.biUnion fun x => (t x).toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_bUnion' Set.fintypeBiUnion'
section monad
attribute [local instance] Set.monad
/-- If `s : Set α` is a set with `Fintype` instance and `f : α → Set β` is a function such that
each `f a`, `a ∈ s`, has a `Fintype` structure, then `s >>= f` has a `Fintype` structure. -/
def fintypeBind {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (f : α → Set β)
(H : ∀ a ∈ s, Fintype (f a)) : Fintype (s >>= f) :=
Set.fintypeBiUnion s f H
#align set.fintype_bind Set.fintypeBind
instance fintypeBind' {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (f : α → Set β)
[∀ a, Fintype (f a)] : Fintype (s >>= f) :=
Set.fintypeBiUnion' s f
#align set.fintype_bind' Set.fintypeBind'
end monad
instance fintypeEmpty : Fintype (∅ : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset ∅ <| by simp
#align set.fintype_empty Set.fintypeEmpty
instance fintypeSingleton (a : α) : Fintype ({a} : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset {a} <| by simp
#align set.fintype_singleton Set.fintypeSingleton
instance fintypePure : ∀ a : α, Fintype (pure a : Set α) :=
Set.fintypeSingleton
#align set.fintype_pure Set.fintypePure
/-- A `Fintype` instance for inserting an element into a `Set` using the
corresponding `insert` function on `Finset`. This requires `DecidableEq α`.
There is also `Set.fintypeInsert'` when `a ∈ s` is decidable. -/
instance fintypeInsert (a : α) (s : Set α) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (insert a s.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_insert Set.fintypeInsert
/-- A `Fintype` structure on `insert a s` when inserting a new element. -/
def fintypeInsertOfNotMem {a : α} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset ⟨a ::ₘ s.toFinset.1, s.toFinset.nodup.cons (by simp [h])⟩ <| by simp
#align set.fintype_insert_of_not_mem Set.fintypeInsertOfNotMem
/-- A `Fintype` structure on `insert a s` when inserting a pre-existing element. -/
def fintypeInsertOfMem {a : α} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (h : a ∈ s) : Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset s.toFinset <| by simp [h]
#align set.fintype_insert_of_mem Set.fintypeInsertOfMem
/-- The `Set.fintypeInsert` instance requires decidable equality, but when `a ∈ s`
is decidable for this particular `a` we can still get a `Fintype` instance by using
`Set.fintypeInsertOfNotMem` or `Set.fintypeInsertOfMem`.
This instance pre-dates `Set.fintypeInsert`, and it is less efficient.
When `Set.decidableMemOfFintype` is made a local instance, then this instance would
override `Set.fintypeInsert` if not for the fact that its priority has been
adjusted. See Note [lower instance priority]. -/
instance (priority := 100) fintypeInsert' (a : α) (s : Set α) [Decidable <| a ∈ s] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then fintypeInsertOfMem s h else fintypeInsertOfNotMem s h
#align set.fintype_insert' Set.fintypeInsert'
instance fintypeImage [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Fintype s] : Fintype (f '' s) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.image f) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_image Set.fintypeImage
/-- If a function `f` has a partial inverse and sends a set `s` to a set with `[Fintype]` instance,
then `s` has a `Fintype` structure as well. -/
def fintypeOfFintypeImage (s : Set α) {f : α → β} {g} (I : IsPartialInv f g) [Fintype (f '' s)] :
Fintype s :=
Fintype.ofFinset ⟨_, (f '' s).toFinset.2.filterMap g <| injective_of_isPartialInv_right I⟩
fun a => by
suffices (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s by
simpa [exists_and_left.symm, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
rw [exists_swap]
suffices (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s by simpa [and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
simp [I _, (injective_of_isPartialInv I).eq_iff]
#align set.fintype_of_fintype_image Set.fintypeOfFintypeImage
instance fintypeRange [DecidableEq α] (f : ι → α) [Fintype (PLift ι)] : Fintype (range f) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.univ.image <| f ∘ PLift.down) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_range Set.fintypeRange
instance fintypeMap {α β} [DecidableEq β] :
∀ (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Fintype s], Fintype (f <$> s) :=
Set.fintypeImage
#align set.fintype_map Set.fintypeMap
instance fintypeLTNat (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i | i < n } :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.range n) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_lt_nat Set.fintypeLTNat
instance fintypeLENat (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i | i ≤ n } := by
simpa [Nat.lt_succ_iff] using Set.fintypeLTNat (n + 1)
#align set.fintype_le_nat Set.fintypeLENat
/-- This is not an instance so that it does not conflict with the one
in `Mathlib/Order/LocallyFinite.lean`. -/
def Nat.fintypeIio (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Iio n) :=
Set.fintypeLTNat n
#align set.nat.fintype_Iio Set.Nat.fintypeIio
instance fintypeProd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ×ˢ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_prod Set.fintypeProd
instance fintypeOffDiag [DecidableEq α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype s.offDiag :=
Fintype.ofFinset s.toFinset.offDiag <| by simp
#align set.fintype_off_diag Set.fintypeOffDiag
/-- `image2 f s t` is `Fintype` if `s` and `t` are. -/
instance fintypeImage2 [DecidableEq γ] (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [hs : Fintype s]
[ht : Fintype t] : Fintype (image2 f s t : Set γ) := by
rw [← image_prod]
apply Set.fintypeImage
#align set.fintype_image2 Set.fintypeImage2
instance fintypeSeq [DecidableEq β] (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Fintype f] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (f.seq s) := by
rw [seq_def]
apply Set.fintypeBiUnion'
#align set.fintype_seq Set.fintypeSeq
instance fintypeSeq' {α β : Type u} [DecidableEq β] (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Fintype f]
[Fintype s] : Fintype (f <*> s) :=
Set.fintypeSeq f s
#align set.fintype_seq' Set.fintypeSeq'
instance fintypeMemFinset (s : Finset α) : Fintype { a | a ∈ s } :=
Finset.fintypeCoeSort s
#align set.fintype_mem_finset Set.fintypeMemFinset
end FintypeInstances
end Set
theorem Equiv.set_finite_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hst : s ≃ t) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
simp_rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, hst.finite_iff]
#align equiv.set_finite_iff Equiv.set_finite_iff
/-! ### Finset -/
namespace Finset
/-- Gives a `Set.Finite` for the `Finset` coerced to a `Set`.
This is a wrapper around `Set.toFinite`. -/
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
#align finset.finite_to_set Finset.finite_toSet
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], now `simp` can prove it
theorem finite_toSet_toFinset (s : Finset α) : s.finite_toSet.toFinset = s := by
rw [toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_coe]
#align finset.finite_to_set_to_finset Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset
end Finset
namespace Multiset
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet (s : Multiset α) : { x | x ∈ s }.Finite := by
classical simpa only [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] using s.toFinset.finite_toSet
#align multiset.finite_to_set Multiset.finite_toSet
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.finite_toSet.toFinset = s.toFinset := by
ext x
simp
#align multiset.finite_to_set_to_finset Multiset.finite_toSet_toFinset
end Multiset
@[simp]
theorem List.finite_toSet (l : List α) : { x | x ∈ l }.Finite :=
(show Multiset α from ⟦l⟧).finite_toSet
#align list.finite_to_set List.finite_toSet
/-! ### Finite instances
There is seemingly some overlap between the following instances and the `Fintype` instances
in `Data.Set.Finite`. While every `Fintype` instance gives a `Finite` instance, those
instances that depend on `Fintype` or `Decidable` instances need an additional `Finite` instance
to be able to generally apply.
Some set instances do not appear here since they are consequences of others, for example
`Subtype.Finite` for subsets of a finite type.
-/
namespace Finite.Set
open scoped Classical
example {s : Set α} [Finite α] : Finite s :=
inferInstance
example : Finite (∅ : Set α) :=
inferInstance
example (a : α) : Finite ({a} : Set α) :=
inferInstance
instance finite_union (s t : Set α) [Finite s] [Finite t] : Finite (s ∪ t : Set α) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
cases nonempty_fintype t
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_union Finite.Set.finite_union
instance finite_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) [Finite s] : Finite ({ a ∈ s | p a } : Set α) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_sep Finite.Set.finite_sep
protected theorem subset (s : Set α) {t : Set α} [Finite s] (h : t ⊆ s) : Finite t := by
rw [← sep_eq_of_subset h]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.subset Finite.Set.subset
instance finite_inter_of_right (s t : Set α) [Finite t] : Finite (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset t inter_subset_right
#align finite.set.finite_inter_of_right Finite.Set.finite_inter_of_right
instance finite_inter_of_left (s t : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset s inter_subset_left
#align finite.set.finite_inter_of_left Finite.Set.finite_inter_of_left
instance finite_diff (s t : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (s \ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset s diff_subset
#align finite.set.finite_diff Finite.Set.finite_diff
instance finite_range (f : ι → α) [Finite ι] : Finite (range f) := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite (PLift ι)
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_range Finite.Set.finite_range
instance finite_iUnion [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (f i)] : Finite (⋃ i, f i) := by
rw [iUnion_eq_range_psigma]
apply Set.finite_range
#align finite.set.finite_Union Finite.Set.finite_iUnion
instance finite_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} [Finite s] [H : ∀ t : s, Finite (t : Set α)] :
Finite (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact @Finite.Set.finite_iUnion _ _ _ _ H
#align finite.set.finite_sUnion Finite.Set.finite_sUnion
theorem finite_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Finite s] (t : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ s, Finite (t i)) : Finite (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
haveI : ∀ i : s, Finite (t i) := fun i => H i i.property
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion Finite.Set.finite_biUnion
instance finite_biUnion' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Finite s] (t : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (t i)] :
Finite (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
finite_biUnion s t fun _ _ => inferInstance
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion' Finite.Set.finite_biUnion'
/-- Example: `Finite (⋃ (i < n), f i)` where `f : ℕ → Set α` and `[∀ i, Finite (f i)]`
(when given instances from `Order.Interval.Finset.Nat`).
-/
instance finite_biUnion'' {ι : Type*} (p : ι → Prop) [h : Finite { x | p x }] (t : ι → Set α)
[∀ i, Finite (t i)] : Finite (⋃ (x) (_ : p x), t x) :=
@Finite.Set.finite_biUnion' _ _ (setOf p) h t _
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion'' Finite.Set.finite_biUnion''
instance finite_iInter {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (t i)] :
Finite (⋂ i, t i) :=
Finite.Set.subset (t <| Classical.arbitrary ι) (iInter_subset _ _)
#align finite.set.finite_Inter Finite.Set.finite_iInter
instance finite_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (insert a s : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.finite_union {a} s
#align finite.set.finite_insert Finite.Set.finite_insert
instance finite_image (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Finite s] : Finite (f '' s) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_image Finite.Set.finite_image
instance finite_replacement [Finite α] (f : α → β) :
Finite {f x | x : α} :=
Finite.Set.finite_range f
#align finite.set.finite_replacement Finite.Set.finite_replacement
instance finite_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Finite s] [Finite t] :
Finite (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) :=
Finite.of_equiv _ (Equiv.Set.prod s t).symm
#align finite.set.finite_prod Finite.Set.finite_prod
instance finite_image2 (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Finite s] [Finite t] :
Finite (image2 f s t : Set γ) := by
rw [← image_prod]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_image2 Finite.Set.finite_image2
instance finite_seq (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Finite f] [Finite s] : Finite (f.seq s) := by
rw [seq_def]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_seq Finite.Set.finite_seq
end Finite.Set
namespace Set
/-! ### Constructors for `Set.Finite`
Every constructor here should have a corresponding `Fintype` instance in the previous section
(or in the `Fintype` module).
The implementation of these constructors ideally should be no more than `Set.toFinite`,
after possibly setting up some `Fintype` and classical `Decidable` instances.
-/
section SetFiniteConstructors
@[nontriviality]
theorem Finite.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (s : Set α) : s.Finite :=
s.toFinite
#align set.finite.of_subsingleton Set.Finite.of_subsingleton
theorem finite_univ [Finite α] : (@univ α).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
#align set.finite_univ Set.finite_univ
theorem finite_univ_iff : (@univ α).Finite ↔ Finite α := (Equiv.Set.univ α).finite_iff
#align set.finite_univ_iff Set.finite_univ_iff
alias ⟨_root_.Finite.of_finite_univ, _⟩ := finite_univ_iff
#align finite.of_finite_univ Finite.of_finite_univ
theorem Finite.subset {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {t : Set α} (ht : t ⊆ s) : t.Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
exact Finite.Set.subset _ ht
#align set.finite.subset Set.Finite.subset
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Finite.lean | 742 | 744 | theorem Finite.union {s t : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : (s ∪ t).Finite := by |
rw [Set.Finite] at hs ht
apply toFinite
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Filtered
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DiscreteCategory
#align_import category_theory.limits.opposites from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ac3ae212f394f508df43e37aa093722fa9b65d31"
/-!
# Limits in `C` give colimits in `Cᵒᵖ`.
We also give special cases for (co)products,
(co)equalizers, and pullbacks / pushouts.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {J : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} J]
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cocone_op CategoryTheory.Limits.IsColimit.op
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_op CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.op
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.IsColimit.unop
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.unop
-- 2024-03-26
@[deprecated] alias isLimitCoconeOp := IsColimit.op
@[deprecated] alias isColimitConeOp := IsLimit.op
@[deprecated] alias isLimitCoconeUnop := IsColimit.unop
@[deprecated] alias isColimitConeUnop := IsLimit.unop
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeLeftOpOfCocone (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneLeftOpOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeLeftOp s)).unop
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| by
simp only [coneLeftOpOfCocone_π_app, op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac,
coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app, op_unop]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac, coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_left_op_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeLeftOpOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit of `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a colimit of `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeLeftOpOfCone (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeLeftOpOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeLeftOp s)).unop
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| by
simp only [coconeLeftOpOfCone_ι_app, op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac,
coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app, op_unop]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac, coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_left_op_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeLeftOpOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a limit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeRightOpOfCocone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneRightOpOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeRightOp s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_right_op_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeRightOpOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a colimit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeRightOpOfCone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeRightOpOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeRightOp s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_right_op_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeRightOpOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeUnopOfCocone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneUnopOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeUnop s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_unop_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeUnopOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit of `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a colimit of `F.unop : J ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeUnopOfCone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeUnopOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeUnop s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_unop_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeUnopOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a limit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F.leftOp} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeLeftOp c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeLeftOpOfCone s)).op
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by
simp only [coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app, unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac,
coconeLeftOpOfCone_ι_app, unop_op]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac, coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp
/-- Turn a limit of `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a colimit of `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F.leftOp} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeLeftOp c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneLeftOpOfCocone s)).op
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by
simp only [coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app, unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac,
coneLeftOpOfCocone_π_app, unop_op]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac, coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_of_cone_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeRightOp (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cocone F.rightOp} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeRightOp c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeRightOpOfCone s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_right_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeRightOp
/-- Turn a limit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeOfConeRightOp (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cone F.rightOp} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeRightOp c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneRightOpOfCocone s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_of_cone_right_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeOfConeRightOp
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeUnop (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F.unop} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeUnop c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeUnopOfCone s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeUnop
/-- Turn a limit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C` into a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitConeOfCoconeUnop (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F.unop} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeUnop c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneUnopOfCocone s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_of_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitConeOfCoconeUnop
/-- If `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` has a colimit, we can construct a limit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
theorem hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) [HasColimit F.leftOp] : HasLimit F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := coneOfCoconeLeftOp (colimit.cocone F.leftOp)
isLimit := isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp _ (colimit.isColimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_colimit_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp
theorem hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F.op] : HasLimit F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (colimit.cocone F.op).unop
isLimit := (colimit.isColimit _).unop }
theorem hasLimit_op_of_hasColimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : HasLimit F.op :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (colimit.cocone F).op
isLimit := (colimit.isColimit _).op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_colimit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op
/-- If `C` has colimits of shape `Jᵒᵖ`, we can construct limits in `Cᵒᵖ` of shape `J`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape [HasColimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C] :
HasLimitsOfShape J Cᵒᵖ :=
{ has_limit := fun F => hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_op_of_has_colimits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op [HasColimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ] :
HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
{ has_limit := fun F => hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_of_has_colimits_of_shape_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op
attribute [local instance] hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
/-- If `C` has colimits, we can construct limits for `Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
instance hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits [HasColimits C] : HasLimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_op_of_has_colimits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits
theorem hasLimits_of_hasColimits_op [HasColimits Cᵒᵖ] : HasLimits C :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := fun _ _ => hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_has_colimits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimits_of_hasColimits_op
instance has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits [HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C] :
HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ where
HasLimitsOfShape _ _ _ := hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
#align category_theory.limits.has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits CategoryTheory.Limits.has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits
theorem has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op [HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ] :
HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C :=
{ HasLimitsOfShape := fun _ _ _ => hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op
/-- If `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` has a limit, we can construct a colimit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
theorem hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) [HasLimit F.leftOp] : HasColimit F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := coconeOfConeLeftOp (limit.cone F.leftOp)
isColimit := isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp _ (limit.isLimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit_of_has_limit_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp
theorem hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F.op] : HasColimit F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (limit.cone F.op).unop
isColimit := (limit.isLimit _).unop }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit_of_has_limit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op
theorem hasColimit_op_of_hasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : HasColimit F.op :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (limit.cone F).op
isColimit := (limit.isLimit _).op }
/-- If `C` has colimits of shape `Jᵒᵖ`, we can construct limits in `Cᵒᵖ` of shape `J`.
-/
instance hasColimitsOfShape_op_of_hasLimitsOfShape [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C] :
HasColimitsOfShape J Cᵒᵖ where has_colimit F := hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp F
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_shape_op_of_has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitsOfShape_op_of_hasLimitsOfShape
theorem hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ] :
HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
{ has_colimit := fun F => hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_shape_of_has_limits_of_shape_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op
/-- If `C` has limits, we can construct colimits for `Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
instance hasColimits_op_of_hasLimits [HasLimits C] : HasColimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_op_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimits_op_of_hasLimits
theorem hasColimits_of_hasLimits_op [HasLimits Cᵒᵖ] : HasColimits C :=
{ has_colimits_of_shape := fun _ _ => hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_has_limits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimits_of_hasLimits_op
instance has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits [HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C] :
HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ where HasColimitsOfShape _ _ _ := inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits
theorem has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op [HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ] :
HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C :=
{ HasColimitsOfShape := fun _ _ _ => hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op
variable (X : Type v₂)
/-- If `C` has products indexed by `X`, then `Cᵒᵖ` has coproducts indexed by `X`.
-/
instance hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite [HasProductsOfShape X C] : HasCoproductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_shape_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite
theorem hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite [HasProductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ] : HasCoproductsOfShape X C :=
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_shape_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite
/-- If `C` has coproducts indexed by `X`, then `Cᵒᵖ` has products indexed by `X`.
-/
instance hasProductsOfShape_opposite [HasCoproductsOfShape X C] : HasProductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_shape_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProductsOfShape_opposite
theorem hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite [HasCoproductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ] : HasProductsOfShape X C :=
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_shape_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite
instance hasProducts_opposite [HasCoproducts.{v₂} C] : HasProducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ := fun _ =>
inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProducts_opposite
theorem hasProducts_of_opposite [HasCoproducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ] : HasProducts.{v₂} C := fun X =>
hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite X
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProducts_of_opposite
instance hasCoproducts_opposite [HasProducts.{v₂} C] : HasCoproducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ := fun _ =>
inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproducts_opposite
theorem hasCoproducts_of_opposite [HasProducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ] : HasCoproducts.{v₂} C := fun X =>
hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite X
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproducts_of_opposite
instance hasFiniteCoproducts_opposite [HasFiniteProducts C] : HasFiniteCoproducts Cᵒᵖ where
out _ := Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite _
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_coproducts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteCoproducts_opposite
theorem hasFiniteCoproducts_of_opposite [HasFiniteProducts Cᵒᵖ] : HasFiniteCoproducts C :=
{ out := fun _ => hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite _ }
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_coproducts_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteCoproducts_of_opposite
instance hasFiniteProducts_opposite [HasFiniteCoproducts C] : HasFiniteProducts Cᵒᵖ where
out _ := inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_products_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteProducts_opposite
theorem hasFiniteProducts_of_opposite [HasFiniteCoproducts Cᵒᵖ] : HasFiniteProducts C :=
{ out := fun _ => hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite _ }
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_products_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteProducts_of_opposite
section OppositeCoproducts
variable {α : Type*} {Z : α → C} [HasCoproduct Z]
instance : HasLimit (Discrete.functor Z).op := hasLimit_op_of_hasColimit (Discrete.functor Z)
instance : HasLimit ((Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op) :=
hasLimitEquivalenceComp (Discrete.opposite α).symm
instance : HasProduct (op <| Z ·) := hasLimitOfIso
((Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ by rfl)) :
(Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op ≅
Discrete.functor (op <| Z ·))
/-- A `Cofan` gives a `Fan` in the opposite category. -/
@[simp]
def Cofan.op (c : Cofan Z) : Fan (op <| Z ·) := Fan.mk _ (fun a ↦ (c.inj a).op)
/-- If a `Cofan` is colimit, then its opposite is limit. -/
def Cofan.IsColimit.op {c : Cofan Z} (hc : IsColimit c) : IsLimit c.op := by
let e : Discrete.functor (Opposite.op <| Z ·) ≅ (Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙
(Discrete.functor Z).op := Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
refine IsLimit.ofIsoLimit ((IsLimit.postcomposeInvEquiv e _).2
(IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.op (Discrete.opposite α).symm))
(Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ ?_))
dsimp
erw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
rfl
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of an abstract coproduct to the corresponding product
in the opposite category.
-/
def opCoproductIsoProduct' {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) : op c.pt ≅ f.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (Cofan.IsColimit.op hc) hf
variable (Z) in
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of the coproduct to the product in the opposite
category.
-/
def opCoproductIsoProduct :
op (∐ Z) ≅ ∏ᶜ (op <| Z ·) :=
opCoproductIsoProduct' (coproductIsCoproduct Z) (productIsProduct (op <| Z ·))
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) (b : α) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).inv ≫ (c.inj b).op = f.proj b :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp (Cofan.IsColimit.op hc) hf ⟨b⟩
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct'_comp_self {c c' : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc' : IsColimit c') (hf : IsLimit f) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).hom ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct' hc' hf).inv =
(hc.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc').op.inv := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
apply hc'.hom_ext
intro ⟨j⟩
change c'.inj _ ≫ _ = _
simp only [unop_op, unop_comp, Discrete.functor_obj, const_obj_obj, Iso.op_inv,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv]
apply Quiver.Hom.op_inj
simp only [op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, Category.assoc,
opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj]
rw [← opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj hc hf]
simp only [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
rfl
variable (Z) in
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct_inv_comp_ι (b : α) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct Z).inv ≫ (Sigma.ι Z b).op = Pi.π (op <| Z ·) b :=
opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj _ _ b
theorem desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct'_hom {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) (c' : Cofan Z) :
(hc.desc c').op ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).hom = hf.lift c'.op := by
refine (Iso.eq_comp_inv _).mp (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext (fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)))
simp only [unop_op, Discrete.functor_obj, const_obj_obj, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac,
Cofan.op, unop_comp, op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, Category.assoc]
erw [opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj, IsLimit.fac]
rfl
theorem desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct_hom {X : C} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) :
(Sigma.desc π).op ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct Z).hom = Pi.lift (fun a ↦ (π a).op) := by
convert desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct'_hom (coproductIsCoproduct Z)
(productIsProduct (op <| Z ·)) (Cofan.mk _ π)
· ext; simp [Sigma.desc, coproductIsCoproduct]
· ext; simp [Pi.lift, productIsProduct]
end OppositeCoproducts
section OppositeProducts
variable {α : Type*} {Z : α → C} [HasProduct Z]
instance : HasColimit (Discrete.functor Z).op := hasColimit_op_of_hasLimit (Discrete.functor Z)
instance : HasColimit ((Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op) :=
hasColimit_equivalence_comp (Discrete.opposite α).symm
instance : HasCoproduct (op <| Z ·) := hasColimitOfIso
((Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ by rfl)) :
(Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op ≅
Discrete.functor (op <| Z ·)).symm
/-- A `Fan` gives a `Cofan` in the opposite category. -/
@[simp]
def Fan.op (f : Fan Z) : Cofan (op <| Z ·) := Cofan.mk _ (fun a ↦ (f.proj a).op)
/-- If a `Fan` is limit, then its opposite is colimit. -/
def Fan.IsLimit.op {f : Fan Z} (hf : IsLimit f) : IsColimit f.op := by
let e : Discrete.functor (Opposite.op <| Z ·) ≅ (Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙
(Discrete.functor Z).op := Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
refine IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ((IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv e _).2
(IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hf.op (Discrete.opposite α).symm))
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ ?_))
dsimp
erw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
rfl
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of an abstract product to the corresponding coproduct
in the opposite category.
-/
def opProductIsoCoproduct' {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) : op f.pt ≅ c.pt :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (Fan.IsLimit.op hf) hc
variable (Z) in
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of the product to the coproduct in the opposite
category.
-/
def opProductIsoCoproduct :
op (∏ᶜ Z) ≅ ∐ (op <| Z ·) :=
opProductIsoCoproduct' (productIsProduct Z) (coproductIsCoproduct (op <| Z ·))
theorem proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) (b : α) :
(f.proj b).op ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).hom = c.inj b :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (Fan.IsLimit.op hf) hc ⟨b⟩
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct'_comp_self {f f' : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hf' : IsLimit f') (hc : IsColimit c) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).hom ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct' hf' hc).inv =
(hf.conePointUniqueUpToIso hf').op.inv := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
apply hf.hom_ext
intro ⟨j⟩
change _ ≫ f.proj _ = _
simp only [unop_op, unop_comp, Category.assoc, Discrete.functor_obj, Iso.op_inv,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp]
apply Quiver.Hom.op_inj
simp only [op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom]
rw [← proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom hf' hc]
simp only [Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
rfl
variable (Z) in
theorem π_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct_hom (b : α) :
(Pi.π Z b).op ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct Z).hom = Sigma.ι (op <| Z ·) b :=
proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom _ _ b
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct'_inv_comp_lift {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) (f' : Fan Z) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).inv ≫ (hf.lift f').op = hc.desc f'.op := by
refine (Iso.inv_comp_eq _).mpr (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hf.hom_ext (fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)))
simp only [Discrete.functor_obj, unop_op, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac, Fan.op, unop_comp,
Category.assoc, op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop]
erw [← Category.assoc, proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom, IsColimit.fac]
rfl
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct_inv_comp_lift {X : C} (π : (a : α) → X ⟶ Z a) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct Z).inv ≫ (Pi.lift π).op = Sigma.desc (fun a ↦ (π a).op) := by
convert opProductIsoCoproduct'_inv_comp_lift (productIsProduct Z)
(coproductIsCoproduct (op <| Z ·)) (Fan.mk _ π)
· ext; simp [Pi.lift, productIsProduct]
· ext; simp [Sigma.desc, coproductIsCoproduct]
end OppositeProducts
instance hasEqualizers_opposite [HasCoequalizers C] : HasEqualizers Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingParallelPairOpEquiv
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_equalizers_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasEqualizers_opposite
instance hasCoequalizers_opposite [HasEqualizers C] : HasCoequalizers Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingParallelPairOpEquiv
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coequalizers_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoequalizers_opposite
instance hasFiniteColimits_opposite [HasFiniteLimits C] : HasFiniteColimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_colimits_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteColimits_opposite
instance hasFiniteLimits_opposite [HasFiniteColimits C] : HasFiniteLimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_limits_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteLimits_opposite
instance hasPullbacks_opposite [HasPushouts C] : HasPullbacks Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape WalkingCospanᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingCospanOpEquiv.symm
apply hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullbacks_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullbacks_opposite
instance hasPushouts_opposite [HasPullbacks C] : HasPushouts Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape WalkingSpanᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingSpanOpEquiv.symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushouts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushouts_opposite
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `Span f.op g.op` and `(Cospan f g).op` -/
@[simps!]
def spanOp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
span f.op g.op ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> rfl)
(by rintro (_ | _ | _) (_ | _ | _) f <;> cases f <;> aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.span_op CategoryTheory.Limits.spanOp
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `(Cospan f g).op` and `Span f.op g.op` -/
@[simps!]
def opCospan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).op ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ span f.op g.op :=
calc
(cospan f g).op ≅ 𝟭 _ ⋙ (cospan f g).op := by rfl
_ ≅ (walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse) ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
(isoWhiskerRight walkingCospanOpEquiv.unitIso _)
_ ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _)
_ ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ span f.op g.op := isoWhiskerLeft _ (spanOp f g).symm
#align category_theory.limits.op_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.opCospan
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `Cospan f.op g.op` and `(Span f g).op` -/
@[simps!]
def cospanOp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
cospan f.op g.op ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (span f g).op :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> rfl)
(by rintro (_ | _ | _) (_ | _ | _) f <;> cases f <;> aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_op CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanOp
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `(Span f g).op` and `Cospan f.op g.op` -/
@[simps!]
def opSpan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
(span f g).op ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ cospan f.op g.op :=
calc
(span f g).op ≅ 𝟭 _ ⋙ (span f g).op := by rfl
_ ≅ (walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse) ⋙ (span f g).op :=
(isoWhiskerRight walkingSpanOpEquiv.unitIso _)
_ ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (span f g).op :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _)
_ ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ cospan f.op g.op := isoWhiskerLeft _ (cospanOp f g).symm
#align category_theory.limits.op_span CategoryTheory.Limits.opSpan
namespace PushoutCocone
-- Porting note: it was originally @[simps (config := lemmasOnly)]
/-- The obvious map `PushoutCocone f g → PullbackCone f.unop g.unop` -/
@[simps!]
def unop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
PullbackCone f.unop g.unop :=
Cocone.unop
((Cocones.precompose (opCospan f.unop g.unop).hom).obj
(Cocone.whisker walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor c))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_fst {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.unop.fst = c.inl.unop := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_snd {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.unop.snd = c.inr.unop := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop_snd
-- Porting note: it was originally @[simps (config := lemmasOnly)]
/-- The obvious map `PushoutCocone f.op g.op → PullbackCone f g` -/
@[simps!]
def op {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) : PullbackCone f.op g.op :=
(Cones.postcompose (cospanOp f g).symm.hom).obj
(Cone.whisker walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse (Cocone.op c))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.op
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_fst {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.op.fst = c.inl.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.op_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_snd {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.op.snd = c.inr.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.op_snd
end PushoutCocone
namespace PullbackCone
-- Porting note: it was originally @[simps (config := lemmasOnly)]
/-- The obvious map `PullbackCone f g → PushoutCocone f.unop g.unop` -/
@[simps!]
def unop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
PushoutCocone f.unop g.unop :=
Cone.unop
((Cones.postcompose (opSpan f.unop g.unop).symm.hom).obj
(Cone.whisker walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor c))
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.unop
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_inl {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
c.unop.inl = c.fst.unop := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.unop_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.unop_inl
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_inr {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
c.unop.inr = c.snd.unop := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.unop_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.unop_inr
/-- The obvious map `PullbackCone f g → PushoutCocone f.op g.op` -/
@[simps!]
def op {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) : PushoutCocone f.op g.op :=
(Cocones.precompose (spanOp f g).hom).obj
(Cocone.whisker walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse (Cone.op c))
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.op CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.op
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_inl {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
c.op.inl = c.fst.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.op_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.op_inl
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_inr {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
c.op.inr = c.snd.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.op_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.op_inr
/-- If `c` is a pullback cone, then `c.op.unop` is isomorphic to `c`. -/
def opUnop {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.op.unop ≅ c :=
PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.op_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.opUnop
/-- If `c` is a pullback cone in `Cᵒᵖ`, then `c.unop.op` is isomorphic to `c`. -/
def unopOp {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.unop.op ≅ c :=
PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.unop_op CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.unopOp
end PullbackCone
namespace PushoutCocone
/-- If `c` is a pushout cocone, then `c.op.unop` is isomorphic to `c`. -/
def opUnop {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.op.unop ≅ c :=
PushoutCocone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.opUnop
/-- If `c` is a pushout cocone in `Cᵒᵖ`, then `c.unop.op` is isomorphic to `c`. -/
def unopOp {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.unop.op ≅ c :=
PushoutCocone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop_op CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unopOp
/-- A pushout cone is a colimit cocone if and only if the corresponding pullback cone
in the opposite category is a limit cone. -/
def isColimitEquivIsLimitOp {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
IsColimit c ≃ IsLimit c.op := by
apply equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton
· intro h
exact (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).invFun
((IsLimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv walkingSpanOpEquiv.symm).toFun h.op)
· intro h
exact (IsColimit.equivIsoColimit c.opUnop).toFun
(((IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).invFun
((IsLimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv _).toFun h)).unop)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_equiv_is_limit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitEquivIsLimitOp
/-- A pushout cone is a colimit cocone in `Cᵒᵖ` if and only if the corresponding pullback cone
in `C` is a limit cone. -/
def isColimitEquivIsLimitUnop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
IsColimit c ≃ IsLimit c.unop := by
apply equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton
· intro h
exact ((IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).invFun
((IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv _).toFun h)).unop
· intro h
exact (IsColimit.equivIsoColimit c.unopOp).toFun
((IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).invFun
((IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv walkingCospanOpEquiv.symm).toFun h.op))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_equiv_is_limit_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitEquivIsLimitUnop
end PushoutCocone
namespace PullbackCone
/-- A pullback cone is a limit cone if and only if the corresponding pushout cocone
in the opposite category is a colimit cocone. -/
def isLimitEquivIsColimitOp {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
IsLimit c ≃ IsColimit c.op :=
(IsLimit.equivIsoLimit c.opUnop).symm.trans c.op.isColimitEquivIsLimitUnop.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_equiv_is_colimit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitEquivIsColimitOp
/-- A pullback cone is a limit cone in `Cᵒᵖ` if and only if the corresponding pushout cocone
in `C` is a colimit cocone. -/
def isLimitEquivIsColimitUnop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
IsLimit c ≃ IsColimit c.unop :=
(IsLimit.equivIsoLimit c.unopOp).symm.trans c.unop.isColimitEquivIsLimitOp.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_equiv_is_colimit_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitEquivIsColimitUnop
end PullbackCone
section Pullback
open Opposite
/-- The pullback of `f` and `g` in `C` is isomorphic to the pushout of
`f.op` and `g.op` in `Cᵒᵖ`. -/
noncomputable def pullbackIsoUnopPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [h : HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] : pullback f g ≅ unop (pushout f.op g.op) :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (@limit.isLimit _ _ _ _ _ h)
((PushoutCocone.isColimitEquivIsLimitUnop _) (colimit.isColimit (span f.op g.op)))
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_fst {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] :
(pullbackIsoUnopPushout f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst = (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f.op g.op).unop :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _).trans (by simp [unop_id (X := { unop := X })])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_snd {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] :
(pullbackIsoUnopPushout f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd = (pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f.op g.op).unop :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _).trans (by simp [unop_id (X := { unop := Y })])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout_inv_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoUnopPushout_hom_inl {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] :
pushout.inl ≫ (pullbackIsoUnopPushout f g).hom.op = pullback.fst.op := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
dsimp
rw [← pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_fst, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout_hom_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout_hom_inl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoUnopPushout_hom_inr {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] : pushout.inr ≫ (pullbackIsoUnopPushout f g).hom.op =
pullback.snd.op := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
dsimp
rw [← pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_snd, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout_hom_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout_hom_inr
end Pullback
section Pushout
/-- The pushout of `f` and `g` in `C` is isomorphic to the pullback of
`f.op` and `g.op` in `Cᵒᵖ`. -/
noncomputable def pushoutIsoUnopPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : X ⟶ Y) [h : HasPushout f g]
[HasPullback f.op g.op] : pushout f g ≅ unop (pullback f.op g.op) :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (@colimit.isColimit _ _ _ _ _ h)
((PullbackCone.isLimitEquivIsColimitUnop _) (limit.isLimit (cospan f.op g.op)))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_iso_unop_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsoUnopPullback
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inl_hom {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPullback f.op g.op] :
pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutIsoUnopPullback f g).hom =
(pullback.fst : pullback f.op g.op ⟶ _).unop :=
(IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom _ _ _).trans (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_iso_unop_pullback_inl_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inl_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inr_hom {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPullback f.op g.op] :
pushout.inr ≫ (pushoutIsoUnopPullback f g).hom =
(pullback.snd : pullback f.op g.op ⟶ _).unop :=
(IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom _ _ _).trans (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_iso_unop_pullback_inr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inr_hom
@[simp]
theorem pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inv_fst {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPullback f.op g.op] :
(pushoutIsoUnopPullback f g).inv.op ≫ pullback.fst = pushout.inl.op := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
dsimp
rw [← pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inl_hom, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_iso_unop_pullback_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inv_fst
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Opposites.lean | 846 | 851 | theorem pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inv_snd {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPullback f.op g.op] :
(pushoutIsoUnopPullback f g).inv.op ≫ pullback.snd = pushout.inr.op := by |
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
dsimp
rw [← pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inr_hom, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Partially defined possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `WSeq α` type representing partially defined possibly infinite lists
(referred here as weak sequences).
-/
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
/-- Weak sequences.
While the `Seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `Seq` interspersed
with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it. -/
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Turn a sequence into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
/-- Turn a list into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
/-- Turn a stream into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
/-- The empty weak sequence -/
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
/-- Prepend an element to a weak sequence -/
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
/-- Compute for one tick, without producing any elements -/
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
/-- Destruct a weak sequence, to (eventually possibly) produce either
`none` for `nil` or `some (a, s)` if an element is produced. -/
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
/-- Recursion principle for weak sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
/-- membership for weak sequences-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
/-- Get the head of a weak sequence. This involves a possibly
infinite computation. -/
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
/-- Encode a computation yielding a weak sequence into additional
`think` constructors in a weak sequence -/
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
/-- Get the tail of a weak sequence. This doesn't need a `Computation`
wrapper, unlike `head`, because `flatten` allows us to hide this
in the construction of the weak sequence itself. -/
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
/-- drop the first `n` elements from `s`. -/
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
/-- Get the nth element of `s`. -/
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
/-- Convert `s` to a list (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
/-- Get the length of `s` (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
/-- A weak sequence is finite if `toList s` terminates. Equivalently,
it is a finite number of `think` and `cons` applied to `nil`. -/
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
/-- Get the list corresponding to a finite weak sequence. -/
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
/-- A weak sequence is *productive* if it never stalls forever - there are
always a finite number of `think`s between `cons` constructors.
The sequence itself is allowed to be infinite though. -/
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
/-- Replace the `n`th element of `s` with `a`. -/
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
/-- Remove the `n`th element of `s`. -/
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
/-- Map the elements of `s` over `f`, removing any values that yield `none`. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
/-- Select the elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
/-- Get the first element of `s` satisfying `p`. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
/-- Zip a function over two weak sequences -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
/-- Zip two weak sequences into a single sequence of pairs -/
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
/-- Get the list of indexes of elements of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
/-- Get the index of the first element of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
/-- Get the index of the first occurrence of `a` in `s` -/
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
/-- Get the indexes of occurrences of `a` in `s` -/
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
/-- `union s1 s2` is a weak sequence which interleaves `s1` and `s2` in
some order (nondeterministically). -/
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
/-- Returns `true` if `s` is `nil` and `false` if `s` has an element -/
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
/-- Calculate one step of computation -/
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
/-- Get the first `n` elements of a weak sequence -/
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
/-- Split the sequence at position `n` into a finite initial segment
and the weak sequence tail -/
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
/-- Returns `true` if any element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
/-- Returns `true` if every element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
/-- Apply a function to the elements of the sequence to produce a sequence
of partial results. (There is no `scanr` because this would require
working from the end of the sequence, which may not exist.) -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
/-- Get the weak sequence of initial segments of the input sequence -/
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
/-- Like take, but does not wait for a result. Calculates `n` steps of
computation and returns the sequence computed so far -/
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
/-- Append two weak sequences. As with `Seq.append`, this may not use
the second sequence if the first one takes forever to compute -/
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
/-- Map a function over a weak sequence -/
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of weak sequences. (Note that this allows
empty sequences, unlike `Seq.join`.) -/
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
/-- Monadic bind operator for weak sequences -/
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
/-- lift a relation to a relation over weak sequences -/
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
/-- Definition of bisimilarity for weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
/-- Two weak sequences are `LiftRel R` related if they are either both empty,
or they are both nonempty and the heads are `R` related and the tails are
`LiftRel R` related. (This is a coinductive definition.) -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
/-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
arrive at the answer. -/
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_nil Stream'.WSeq.tail_nil
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_cons Stream'.WSeq.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : WSeq α) : tail (think s) = (tail s).think := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_think Stream'.WSeq.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem dropn_nil (n) : drop (nil : WSeq α) n = nil := by induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_nil Stream'.WSeq.dropn_nil
@[simp]
theorem dropn_cons (a : α) (s) (n) : drop (cons a s) (n + 1) = drop s n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [drop]
| succ n n_ih =>
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [*, drop]`.
simp [drop, ← n_ih]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_cons Stream'.WSeq.dropn_cons
@[simp]
theorem dropn_think (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (think s) n = (drop s n).think := by
induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_think Stream'.WSeq.dropn_think
theorem dropn_add (s : WSeq α) (m) : ∀ n, drop s (m + n) = drop (drop s m) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => congr_arg tail (dropn_add s m n)
#align stream.wseq.dropn_add Stream'.WSeq.dropn_add
theorem dropn_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (tail s) n = drop s (n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
symm
apply dropn_add
#align stream.wseq.dropn_tail Stream'.WSeq.dropn_tail
theorem get?_add (s : WSeq α) (m n) : get? s (m + n) = get? (drop s m) n :=
congr_arg head (dropn_add _ _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_add Stream'.WSeq.get?_add
theorem get?_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
congr_arg head (dropn_tail _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_tail Stream'.WSeq.get?_tail
@[simp]
theorem join_nil : join nil = (nil : WSeq α) :=
Seq.join_nil
#align stream.wseq.join_nil Stream'.WSeq.join_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_think (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : join (think S) = think (join S) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, Seq1.ret]
#align stream.wseq.join_think Stream'.WSeq.join_think
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s : WSeq α) (S) : join (cons s S) = think (append s (join S)) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, cons, append]
#align stream.wseq.join_cons Stream'.WSeq.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : WSeq α) : append nil s = s :=
Seq.nil_append _
#align stream.wseq.nil_append Stream'.WSeq.nil_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.cons_append Stream'.WSeq.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem think_append (s t : WSeq α) : append (think s) t = think (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.think_append Stream'.WSeq.think_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil (s : WSeq α) : append s nil = s :=
Seq.append_nil _
#align stream.wseq.append_nil Stream'.WSeq.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem append_assoc (s t u : WSeq α) : append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) :=
Seq.append_assoc _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.append_assoc Stream'.WSeq.append_assoc
/-- auxiliary definition of tail over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def tail.aux : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (_, s) => destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail.aux Stream'.WSeq.tail.aux
theorem destruct_tail (s : WSeq α) : destruct (tail s) = destruct s >>= tail.aux := by
simp only [tail, destruct_flatten, tail.aux]; rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
apply congr_arg; ext1 (_ | ⟨a, s⟩) <;> apply (@pure_bind Computation _ _ _ _ _ _).trans _ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.destruct_tail Stream'.WSeq.destruct_tail
/-- auxiliary definition of drop over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def drop.aux : ℕ → Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| 0 => Computation.pure
| n + 1 => fun a => tail.aux a >>= drop.aux n
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux
theorem drop.aux_none : ∀ n, @drop.aux α n none = Computation.pure none
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
show Computation.bind (Computation.pure none) (drop.aux n) = Computation.pure none by
rw [ret_bind, drop.aux_none n]
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux_none Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux_none
theorem destruct_dropn : ∀ (s : WSeq α) (n), destruct (drop s n) = destruct s >>= drop.aux n
| s, 0 => (bind_pure' _).symm
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [← dropn_tail, destruct_dropn _ n, destruct_tail, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_dropn Stream'.WSeq.destruct_dropn
theorem head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates (s : WSeq α) [T : Terminates (head (tail s))] :
Terminates (head s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).2 <| by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 T with ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
simp? [tail] at h says simp only [tail, destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨s', h1, _⟩
unfold Functor.map at h1
exact
let ⟨t, h3, _⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h1
Computation.terminates_of_mem h3
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates
theorem destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ destruct (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ destruct s := by
unfold tail Functor.map at h; simp only [destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨t, tm, td⟩; clear h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map tm with ⟨t', ht', ht2⟩; clear tm
cases' t' with t' <;> rw [← ht2] at td <;> simp only [destruct_nil] at td
· have := mem_unique td (ret_mem _)
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, ht'⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_head_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ head (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
unfold head at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, md, e⟩; clear h
cases' o with o <;> [injection e; injection e with h']; clear h'
cases' destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some md with a am
exact ⟨_, Computation.mem_map (@Prod.fst α (WSeq α) <$> ·) am⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_head_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_head_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_get?_some {s : WSeq α} {a n} (h : some a ∈ get? s n) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
induction n generalizing a with
| zero => exact ⟨_, h⟩
| succ n IH =>
let ⟨a', h'⟩ := head_some_of_head_tail_some h
exact IH h'
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_nth_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_get?_some
instance productive_tail (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Productive (tail s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_tail]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_tail Stream'.WSeq.productive_tail
instance productive_dropn (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] (n) : Productive (drop s n) :=
⟨fun m => by rw [← get?_add]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_dropn Stream'.WSeq.productive_dropn
/-- Given a productive weak sequence, we can collapse all the `think`s to
produce a sequence. -/
def toSeq (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Seq α :=
⟨fun n => (get? s n).get,
fun {n} h => by
cases e : Computation.get (get? s (n + 1))
· assumption
have := Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ e
simp? [get?] at this h says simp only [get?] at this h
cases' head_some_of_head_tail_some this with a' h'
have := mem_unique h' (@Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ _ _ _ h)
contradiction⟩
#align stream.wseq.to_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq
theorem get?_terminates_le {s : WSeq α} {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (get? s m) := by
induction' h with m' _ IH
exacts [id, fun T => IH (@head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates _ _ T)]
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates_le Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates_le
theorem head_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (head s) :=
get?_terminates_le (Nat.zero_le n)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} (T : Terminates (get? s n)) :
Terminates (destruct s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).1 <| head_terminates_of_get?_terminates T
#align stream.wseq.destruct_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem mem_rec_on {C : WSeq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : ∀ b s', a = b ∨ C s' → C (cons b s'))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
apply Seq.mem_rec_on M
intro o s' h; cases' o with b
· apply h2
cases h
· contradiction
· assumption
· apply h1
apply Or.imp_left _ h
intro h
injection h
#align stream.wseq.mem_rec_on Stream'.WSeq.mem_rec_on
@[simp]
theorem mem_think (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ think s ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases' s with f al
change (some (some a) ∈ some none::f) ↔ some (some a) ∈ f
constructor <;> intro h
· apply (Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).resolve_left
intro
injections
· apply Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ h
#align stream.wseq.mem_think Stream'.WSeq.mem_think
theorem eq_or_mem_iff_mem {s : WSeq α} {a a' s'} :
some (a', s') ∈ destruct s → (a ∈ s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s') := by
generalize e : destruct s = c; intro h
revert s
apply Computation.memRecOn h <;> [skip; intro c IH] <;> intro s <;>
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
intro m <;>
have := congr_arg Computation.destruct m <;>
simp at this
· cases' this with i1 i2
rw [i1, i2]
cases' s' with f al
dsimp only [cons, (· ∈ ·), WSeq.Mem, Seq.Mem, Seq.cons]
have h_a_eq_a' : a = a' ↔ some (some a) = some (some a') := by simp
rw [h_a_eq_a']
refine ⟨Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, fun o => ?_⟩
· cases' o with e m
· rw [e]
apply Stream'.mem_cons
· exact Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· simp [IH this]
#align stream.wseq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem Stream'.WSeq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons_iff (s : WSeq α) (b) {a} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
eq_or_mem_iff_mem <| by simp [ret_mem]
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_iff Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_iff
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {s : WSeq α} (b) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inr h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem mem_cons (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ cons a s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_tail {s : WSeq α} {a} : a ∈ tail s → a ∈ s := by
intro h; have := h; cases' h with n e; revert s; simp only [Stream'.get]
induction' n with n IH <;> intro s <;> induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
simp <;> intro m e <;>
injections
· exact Or.inr m
· exact Or.inr m
· apply IH m
rw [e]
cases tail s
rfl
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_tail Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_tail
theorem mem_of_mem_dropn {s : WSeq α} {a} : ∀ {n}, a ∈ drop s n → a ∈ s
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => @mem_of_mem_dropn s a n (mem_of_mem_tail h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_dropn Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_dropn
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 988 | 1,001 | theorem get?_mem {s : WSeq α} {a n} : some a ∈ get? s n → a ∈ s := by |
revert s; induction' n with n IH <;> intro s h
· -- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, h1, h2⟩
cases' o with o
· injection h2
injection h2 with h'
cases' o with a' s'
exact (eq_or_mem_iff_mem h1).2 (Or.inl h'.symm)
· have := @IH (tail s)
rw [get?_tail] at this
exact mem_of_mem_tail (this h)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.log.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f23a09ce6d3f367220dc3cecad6b7eb69eb01690"
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
#align real.log Real.log
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
#align real.log_of_ne_zero Real.log_of_ne_zero
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.log_of_pos Real.log_of_pos
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align real.exp_log_eq_abs Real.exp_log_eq_abs
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.exp_log Real.exp_log
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
#align real.exp_log_of_neg Real.exp_log_of_neg
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
#align real.le_exp_log Real.le_exp_log
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
#align real.log_exp Real.log_exp
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.surj_on_log Real.surjOn_log
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.log_surjective Real.log_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
#align real.range_log Real.range_log
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align real.log_zero Real.log_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
#align real.log_one Real.log_one
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
#align real.log_abs Real.log_abs
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
#align real.log_neg_eq_log Real.log_neg_eq_log
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.sinh_log Real.sinh_log
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.cosh_log Real.cosh_log
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
#align real.surj_on_log' Real.surjOn_log'
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
#align real.log_mul Real.log_mul
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
#align real.log_div Real.log_div
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
#align real.log_inv Real.log_inv
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
#align real.log_le_log Real.log_le_log_iff
@[gcongr]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
#align real.log_lt_log Real.log_lt_log
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
#align real.log_lt_log_iff Real.log_lt_log_iff
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_le_iff_le_exp Real.log_le_iff_le_exp
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp Real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
#align real.le_log_iff_exp_le Real.le_log_iff_exp_le
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
#align real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt Real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt
theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
#align real.log_pos_iff Real.log_pos_iff
theorem log_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < log x :=
(log_pos_iff (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)).2 hx
#align real.log_pos Real.log_pos
theorem log_pos_of_lt_neg_one (hx : x < -1) : 0 < log x := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have : 1 < -x := by linarith
exact log_pos this
theorem log_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : log x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff h zero_lt_one
#align real.log_neg_iff Real.log_neg_iff
theorem log_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : log x < 0 :=
(log_neg_iff h0).2 h1
#align real.log_neg Real.log_neg
theorem log_neg_of_lt_zero (h0 : x < 0) (h1 : -1 < x) : log x < 0 := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have h0' : 0 < -x := by linarith
have h1' : -x < 1 := by linarith
exact log_neg h0' h1'
theorem log_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ log x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← not_lt, log_neg_iff hx, not_lt]
#align real.log_nonneg_iff Real.log_nonneg_iff
theorem log_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ log x :=
(log_nonneg_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
#align real.log_nonneg Real.log_nonneg
theorem log_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by rw [← not_lt, log_pos_iff hx, not_lt]
#align real.log_nonpos_iff Real.log_nonpos_iff
theorem log_nonpos_iff' (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
exact log_nonpos_iff hx
#align real.log_nonpos_iff' Real.log_nonpos_iff'
theorem log_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : log x ≤ 0 :=
(log_nonpos_iff' hx).2 h'x
#align real.log_nonpos Real.log_nonpos
theorem log_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
if hn : n = 0 then
simp [hn]
else
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
exact log_nonneg this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_nat_cast_nonneg := log_natCast_nonneg
theorem log_neg_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log (-n) := by
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, neg_neg]
exact log_natCast_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_neg_nat_cast_nonneg := log_neg_natCast_nonneg
theorem log_intCast_nonneg (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
cases lt_trichotomy 0 n with
| inl hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast hn
exact log_nonneg this
| inr hn =>
cases hn with
| inl hn => simp [hn.symm]
| inr hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ -n := by rw [← neg_zero, ← lt_neg] at hn; exact mod_cast hn
rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
exact log_nonneg this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_int_cast_nonneg := log_intCast_nonneg
theorem strictMonoOn_log : StrictMonoOn log (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy => log_lt_log hx hxy
#align real.strict_mono_on_log Real.strictMonoOn_log
theorem strictAntiOn_log : StrictAntiOn log (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← log_abs y, ← log_abs x]
refine log_lt_log (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
#align real.strict_anti_on_log Real.strictAntiOn_log
theorem log_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn log (Set.Ioi 0) :=
strictMonoOn_log.injOn
#align real.log_inj_on_pos Real.log_injOn_pos
theorem log_lt_sub_one_of_pos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≠ 1) : log x < x - 1 := by
have h : log x ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← log_one, log_injOn_pos.ne_iff hx1]
exact mem_Ioi.mpr zero_lt_one
linarith [add_one_lt_exp h, exp_log hx1]
#align real.log_lt_sub_one_of_pos Real.log_lt_sub_one_of_pos
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : log x = 0) : x = 1 :=
log_injOn_pos (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.log_one.symm)
#align real.eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero Real.eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero
theorem log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : log x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero hx_pos) hx
#align real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one Real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : log x = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (x_lt_zero | rfl | x_gt_zero)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp ?_))
rw [← log_neg_eq_log x] at h
exact eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero (neg_pos.mpr x_lt_zero) h
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero x_gt_zero h))
· rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [log_one, log_zero, log_neg_eq_log]
#align real.log_eq_zero Real.log_eq_zero
theorem log_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : log x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ x ≠ -1 := by
simpa only [not_or] using log_eq_zero.not
#align real.log_ne_zero Real.log_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rw [pow_succ, log_mul (pow_ne_zero _ hx) hx, ih, Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul]
#align real.log_pow Real.log_pow
@[simp]
theorem log_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction n
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast, log_pow, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [zpow_negSucc, log_inv, log_pow, Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
#align real.log_zpow Real.log_zpow
theorem log_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log (√x) = log x / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff, mul_comm, ← Nat.cast_two, ← log_pow, sq_sqrt hx]
exact two_ne_zero
#align real.log_sqrt Real.log_sqrt
theorem log_le_sub_one_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ x - 1 := by
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le]
convert add_one_le_exp (log x)
rw [exp_log hx]
#align real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos Real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos
/-- Bound for `|log x * x|` in the interval `(0, 1]`. -/
theorem abs_log_mul_self_lt (x : ℝ) (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) : |log x * x| < 1 := by
have : 0 < 1 / x := by simpa only [one_div, inv_pos] using h1
replace := log_le_sub_one_of_pos this
replace : log (1 / x) < 1 / x := by linarith
rw [log_div one_ne_zero h1.ne', log_one, zero_sub, lt_div_iff h1] at this
have aux : 0 ≤ -log x * x := by
refine mul_nonneg ?_ h1.le
rw [← log_inv]
apply log_nonneg
rw [← le_inv h1 zero_lt_one, inv_one]
exact h2
rw [← abs_of_nonneg aux, neg_mul, abs_neg] at this
exact this
#align real.abs_log_mul_self_lt Real.abs_log_mul_self_lt
/-- The real logarithm function tends to `+∞` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_log_atTop : Tendsto log atTop atTop :=
tendsto_comp_exp_atTop.1 <| by simpa only [log_exp] using tendsto_id
#align real.tendsto_log_at_top Real.tendsto_log_atTop
theorem tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero : Tendsto log (𝓝[≠] 0) atBot := by
rw [← show _ = log from funext log_abs]
refine Tendsto.comp (g := log) ?_ tendsto_abs_nhdsWithin_zero
simpa [← tendsto_comp_exp_atBot] using tendsto_id
#align real.tendsto_log_nhds_within_zero Real.tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero
lemma tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero_right : Tendsto log (𝓝[>] 0) atBot :=
tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _ h ↦ ne_of_gt h
theorem continuousOn_log : ContinuousOn log {0}ᶜ := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict,
restrict]
conv in log _ => rw [log_of_ne_zero (show (x : ℝ) ≠ 0 from x.2)]
exact expOrderIso.symm.continuous.comp (continuous_subtype_val.norm.subtype_mk _)
#align real.continuous_on_log Real.continuousOn_log
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_log : Continuous fun x : { x : ℝ // x ≠ 0 } => log x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 <| continuousOn_log.mono fun _ => id
#align real.continuous_log Real.continuous_log
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_log' : Continuous fun x : { x : ℝ // 0 < x } => log x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 <| continuousOn_log.mono fun _ hx => ne_of_gt hx
#align real.continuous_log' Real.continuous_log'
theorem continuousAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : ContinuousAt log x :=
(continuousOn_log x hx).continuousAt <| isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hx
#align real.continuous_at_log Real.continuousAt_log
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_log_iff : ContinuousAt log x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨?_, continuousAt_log⟩
rintro h rfl
exact not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atBot tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero _
(h.tendsto.mono_left inf_le_left)
#align real.continuous_at_log_iff Real.continuousAt_log_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 385 | 390 | theorem log_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
log (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, log (f i) := by |
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· simp
· rw [Finset.forall_mem_cons] at hf
simp [ih hf.2, log_mul hf.1 (Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.2 hf.2)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import algebra.ring_quot from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e5820f6c8fcf1b75bcd7738ae4da1c5896191f72"
/-!
# Quotients of non-commutative rings
Unfortunately, ideals have only been developed in the commutative case as `Ideal`,
and it's not immediately clear how one should formalise ideals in the non-commutative case.
In this file, we directly define the quotient of a semiring by any relation,
by building a bigger relation that represents the ideal generated by that relation.
We prove the universal properties of the quotient, and recommend avoiding relying on the actual
definition, which is made irreducible for this purpose.
Since everything runs in parallel for quotients of `R`-algebras, we do that case at the same time.
-/
universe uR uS uT uA u₄
variable {R : Type uR} [Semiring R]
variable {S : Type uS} [CommSemiring S]
variable {T : Type uT}
variable {A : Type uA} [Semiring A] [Algebra S A]
namespace RingCon
instance (c : RingCon A) : Algebra S c.Quotient where
smul := (· • ·)
toRingHom := c.mk'.comp (algebraMap S A)
commutes' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.smul_def _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algebraMap (c : RingCon A) (s : S) :
(algebraMap S A s : c.Quotient) = algebraMap S _ s :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_algebra_map RingCon.coe_algebraMap
end RingCon
namespace RingQuot
/-- Given an arbitrary relation `r` on a ring, we strengthen it to a relation `Rel r`,
such that the equivalence relation generated by `Rel r` has `x ~ y` if and only if
`x - y` is in the ideal generated by elements `a - b` such that `r a b`.
-/
inductive Rel (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of ⦃x y : R⦄ (h : r x y) : Rel r x y
| add_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_right ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r b c → Rel r (a * b) (a * c)
#align ring_quot.rel RingQuot.Rel
theorem Rel.add_right {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) : Rel r (a + b) (a + c) := by
rw [add_comm a b, add_comm a c]
exact Rel.add_left h
#align ring_quot.rel.add_right RingQuot.Rel.add_right
theorem Rel.neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (-a) (-b) := by simp only [neg_eq_neg_one_mul a, neg_eq_neg_one_mul b, Rel.mul_right h]
#align ring_quot.rel.neg RingQuot.Rel.neg
theorem Rel.sub_left {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (a - c) (b - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.add_left]
#align ring_quot.rel.sub_left RingQuot.Rel.sub_left
theorem Rel.sub_right {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) :
Rel r (a - b) (a - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.neg.add_right]
#align ring_quot.rel.sub_right RingQuot.Rel.sub_right
theorem Rel.smul {r : A → A → Prop} (k : S) ⦃a b : A⦄ (h : Rel r a b) : Rel r (k • a) (k • b) := by
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, Rel.mul_right h]
#align ring_quot.rel.smul RingQuot.Rel.smul
/-- `EqvGen (RingQuot.Rel r)` is a ring congruence. -/
def ringCon (r : R → R → Prop) : RingCon R where
r := EqvGen (Rel r)
iseqv := EqvGen.is_equivalence _
add' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.add_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| EqvGen.refl _)
mul' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.mul_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| EqvGen.refl _)
#align ring_quot.ring_con RingQuot.ringCon
theorem eqvGen_rel_eq (r : R → R → Prop) : EqvGen (Rel r) = RingConGen.Rel r := by
ext x₁ x₂
constructor
· intro h
induction h with
| rel _ _ h => induction h with
| of => exact RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ ‹_›
| add_left _ h => exact h.add (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_left _ h => exact h.mul (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_right _ h => exact (RingConGen.Rel.refl _).mul h
| refl => exact RingConGen.Rel.refl _
| symm => exact RingConGen.Rel.symm ‹_›
| trans => exact RingConGen.Rel.trans ‹_› ‹_›
· intro h
induction h with
| of => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ (Rel.of ‹_›)
| refl => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).refl _
| symm => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).symm ‹_›
| trans => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).trans ‹_› ‹_›
| add => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).add ‹_› ‹_›
| mul => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).mul ‹_› ‹_›
#align ring_quot.eqv_gen_rel_eq RingQuot.eqvGen_rel_eq
end RingQuot
/-- The quotient of a ring by an arbitrary relation. -/
structure RingQuot (r : R → R → Prop) where
toQuot : Quot (RingQuot.Rel r)
#align ring_quot RingQuot
namespace RingQuot
variable (r : R → R → Prop)
-- can't be irreducible, causes diamonds in ℕ-algebras
private def natCast (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ n⟩
private irreducible_def zero : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩
private irreducible_def one : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩
private irreducible_def add : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· + ·) Rel.add_right Rel.add_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def mul : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· * ·) Rel.mul_right Rel.mul_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ -a) Rel.neg a⟩
private irreducible_def sub {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) :
RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ Sub.sub Rel.sub_right Rel.sub_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def npow (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ =>
⟨Quot.lift (fun a ↦ Quot.mk (RingQuot.Rel r) (a ^ n))
(fun a b (h : Rel r a b) ↦ by
-- note we can't define a `Rel.pow` as `Rel` isn't reflexive so `Rel r 1 1` isn't true
dsimp only
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
-- Porting note:
-- `simpa [mul_def] using congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) (Quot.sound h) ih`
-- mysteriously doesn't work
have := congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) ih (Quot.sound h)
dsimp only at this
simp? [mul_def] at this says simp only [mul_def, Quot.map₂_mk, mk.injEq] at this
exact this)
a⟩
-- note: this cannot be irreducible, as otherwise diamonds don't commute.
private def smul [Algebra S R] (n : S) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ n • a) (Rel.smul n) a⟩
instance : NatCast (RingQuot r) :=
⟨natCast r⟩
instance : Zero (RingQuot r) :=
⟨zero r⟩
instance : One (RingQuot r) :=
⟨one r⟩
instance : Add (RingQuot r) :=
⟨add r⟩
instance : Mul (RingQuot r) :=
⟨mul r⟩
instance : NatPow (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun x n ↦ npow r n x⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Neg (RingQuot r) :=
⟨neg r⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Sub (RingQuot r) :=
⟨sub r⟩
instance [Algebra S R] : SMul S (RingQuot r) :=
⟨smul r⟩
theorem zero_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩ : RingQuot r) = 0 :=
show _ = zero r by rw [zero_def]
#align ring_quot.zero_quot RingQuot.zero_quot
theorem one_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩ : RingQuot r) = 1 :=
show _ = one r by rw [one_def]
#align ring_quot.one_quot RingQuot.one_quot
theorem add_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ + ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a + b)⟩ := by
show add r _ _ = _
rw [add_def]
rfl
#align ring_quot.add_quot RingQuot.add_quot
theorem mul_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ * ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a * b)⟩ := by
show mul r _ _ = _
rw [mul_def]
rfl
#align ring_quot.mul_quot RingQuot.mul_quot
theorem pow_quot {a} {n : ℕ} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ ^ n : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a ^ n)⟩ := by
show npow r _ _ = _
rw [npow_def]
#align ring_quot.pow_quot RingQuot.pow_quot
| Mathlib/Algebra/RingQuot.lean | 253 | 257 | theorem neg_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a} :
(-⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (-a)⟩ := by |
show neg r _ = _
rw [neg_def]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Bicategory.Functor.Oplax
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.natural_transformation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4ff75f5b8502275a4c2eb2d2f02bdf84d7fb8993"
/-!
# Oplax natural transformations
Just as there are natural transformations between functors, there are oplax natural transformations
between oplax functors. The equality in the naturality of natural transformations is replaced by a
specified 2-morphism `F.map f ≫ app b ⟶ app a ≫ G.map f` in the case of oplax natural
transformations.
## Main definitions
* `OplaxNatTrans F G` : oplax natural transformations between oplax functors `F` and `G`
* `OplaxNatTrans.vcomp η θ` : the vertical composition of oplax natural transformations `η`
and `θ`
* `OplaxNatTrans.category F G` : the category structure on the oplax natural transformations
between `F` and `G`
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Bicategory
open scoped Bicategory
universe w₁ w₂ v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
variable {B : Type u₁} [Bicategory.{w₁, v₁} B] {C : Type u₂} [Bicategory.{w₂, v₂} C]
/-- If `η` is an oplax natural transformation between `F` and `G`, we have a 1-morphism
`η.app a : F.obj a ⟶ G.obj a` for each object `a : B`. We also have a 2-morphism
`η.naturality f : F.map f ≫ app b ⟶ app a ≫ G.map f` for each 1-morphism `f : a ⟶ b`.
These 2-morphisms satisfies the naturality condition, and preserve the identities and
the compositions modulo some adjustments of domains and codomains of 2-morphisms.
-/
structure OplaxNatTrans (F G : OplaxFunctor B C) where
app (a : B) : F.obj a ⟶ G.obj a
naturality {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : F.map f ≫ app b ⟶ app a ≫ G.map f
naturality_naturality :
∀ {a b : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
F.map₂ η ▷ app b ≫ naturality g = naturality f ≫ app a ◁ G.map₂ η := by
aesop_cat
naturality_id :
∀ a : B,
naturality (𝟙 a) ≫ app a ◁ G.mapId a =
F.mapId a ▷ app a ≫ (λ_ (app a)).hom ≫ (ρ_ (app a)).inv := by
aesop_cat
naturality_comp :
∀ {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
naturality (f ≫ g) ≫ app a ◁ G.mapComp f g =
F.mapComp f g ▷ app c ≫
(α_ _ _ _).hom ≫
F.map f ◁ naturality g ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ naturality f ▷ G.map g ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.app CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.app
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.naturality CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.naturality_naturality' CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_naturality
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.naturality_naturality CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_naturality
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.naturality_id' CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_id
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.naturality_id CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_id
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.naturality_comp' CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_comp
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.naturality_comp CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_comp
attribute [nolint docBlame] CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.app
CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality
CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_naturality
CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_id
CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.naturality_comp
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] OplaxNatTrans.naturality_naturality OplaxNatTrans.naturality_id
OplaxNatTrans.naturality_comp
namespace OplaxNatTrans
section
variable (F : OplaxFunctor B C)
/-- The identity oplax natural transformation. -/
@[simps]
def id : OplaxNatTrans F F where
app a := 𝟙 (F.obj a)
naturality {a b} f := (ρ_ (F.map f)).hom ≫ (λ_ (F.map f)).inv
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.id CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.id
instance : Inhabited (OplaxNatTrans F F) :=
⟨id F⟩
variable {F} {G H : OplaxFunctor B C} (η : OplaxNatTrans F G) (θ : OplaxNatTrans G H)
section
variable {a b c : B} {a' : C}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_naturality_naturality (f : a' ⟶ G.obj a) {g h : a ⟶ b} (β : g ⟶ h) :
f ◁ G.map₂ β ▷ θ.app b ≫ f ◁ θ.naturality h =
f ◁ θ.naturality g ≫ f ◁ θ.app a ◁ H.map₂ β := by
simp_rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, naturality_naturality]
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.whisker_left_naturality_naturality CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.whiskerLeft_naturality_naturality
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerRight_naturality_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (β : f ⟶ g) (h : G.obj b ⟶ a') :
F.map₂ β ▷ η.app b ▷ h ≫ η.naturality g ▷ h =
η.naturality f ▷ h ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ η.app a ◁ G.map₂ β ▷ h ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, naturality_naturality, comp_whiskerRight, whisker_assoc]
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.whisker_right_naturality_naturality CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.whiskerRight_naturality_naturality
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_naturality_comp (f : a' ⟶ G.obj a) (g : a ⟶ b) (h : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ θ.naturality (g ≫ h) ≫ f ◁ θ.app a ◁ H.mapComp g h =
f ◁ G.mapComp g h ▷ θ.app c ≫
f ◁ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫
f ◁ G.map g ◁ θ.naturality h ≫
f ◁ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ f ◁ θ.naturality g ▷ H.map h ≫ f ◁ (α_ _ _ _).hom := by
simp_rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, naturality_comp]
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.whisker_left_naturality_comp CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.whiskerLeft_naturality_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerRight_naturality_comp (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : G.obj c ⟶ a') :
η.naturality (f ≫ g) ▷ h ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ η.app a ◁ G.mapComp f g ▷ h =
F.mapComp f g ▷ η.app c ▷ h ≫
(α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ h ≫
(α_ _ _ _).hom ≫
F.map f ◁ η.naturality g ▷ h ≫
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫
(α_ _ _ _).inv ▷ h ≫
η.naturality f ▷ G.map g ▷ h ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ h ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom := by
rw [← associator_naturality_middle, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, naturality_comp]; simp
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.whisker_right_naturality_comp CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.whiskerRight_naturality_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_naturality_id (f : a' ⟶ G.obj a) :
f ◁ θ.naturality (𝟙 a) ≫ f ◁ θ.app a ◁ H.mapId a =
f ◁ G.mapId a ▷ θ.app a ≫ f ◁ (λ_ (θ.app a)).hom ≫ f ◁ (ρ_ (θ.app a)).inv := by
simp_rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, naturality_id]
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.whisker_left_naturality_id CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.whiskerLeft_naturality_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerRight_naturality_id (f : G.obj a ⟶ a') :
η.naturality (𝟙 a) ▷ f ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ η.app a ◁ G.mapId a ▷ f =
F.mapId a ▷ η.app a ▷ f ≫ (λ_ (η.app a)).hom ▷ f ≫ (ρ_ (η.app a)).inv ▷ f ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom := by
rw [← associator_naturality_middle, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, naturality_id]; simp
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.whisker_right_naturality_id CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.whiskerRight_naturality_id
end
/-- Vertical composition of oplax natural transformations. -/
@[simps]
def vcomp (η : OplaxNatTrans F G) (θ : OplaxNatTrans G H) : OplaxNatTrans F H where
app a := η.app a ≫ θ.app a
naturality {a b} f :=
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫
η.naturality f ▷ θ.app b ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ η.app a ◁ θ.naturality f ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv
naturality_comp {a b c} f g := by
calc
_ =
?_ ≫
F.mapComp f g ▷ η.app c ▷ θ.app c ≫
?_ ≫
F.map f ◁ η.naturality g ▷ θ.app c ≫
?_ ≫
(F.map f ≫ η.app b) ◁ θ.naturality g ≫
η.naturality f ▷ (θ.app b ≫ H.map g) ≫
?_ ≫ η.app a ◁ θ.naturality f ▷ H.map g ≫ ?_ :=
?_
_ = _ := ?_
· exact (α_ _ _ _).inv
· exact (α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom
· exact _ ◁ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv
· exact (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ (α_ _ _ _).inv
· exact _ ◁ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv
· rw [whisker_exchange_assoc]
simp
· simp
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.vcomp CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.vcomp
variable (B C)
@[simps id comp]
instance : CategoryStruct (OplaxFunctor B C) where
Hom := OplaxNatTrans
id := OplaxNatTrans.id
comp := OplaxNatTrans.vcomp
end
section
variable {F G : OplaxFunctor B C}
/-- A modification `Γ` between oplax natural transformations `η` and `θ` consists of a family of
2-morphisms `Γ.app a : η.app a ⟶ θ.app a`, which satisfies the equation
`(F.map f ◁ app b) ≫ θ.naturality f = η.naturality f ≫ (app a ▷ G.map f)`
for each 1-morphism `f : a ⟶ b`.
-/
@[ext]
structure Modification (η θ : F ⟶ G) where
app (a : B) : η.app a ⟶ θ.app a
naturality :
∀ {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b),
F.map f ◁ app b ≫ θ.naturality f = η.naturality f ≫ app a ▷ G.map f := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.modification CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.Modification
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.modification.app CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.Modification
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.modification.naturality' CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.Modification.naturality
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.modification.naturality CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.Modification.naturality
attribute [nolint docBlame] CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.Modification.app
CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.Modification.naturality
/- Porting note: removed primes from field names and removed `restate_axiom` since that is no longer
needed in Lean 4 -/
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Modification.naturality
variable {η θ ι : F ⟶ G}
namespace Modification
variable (η)
/-- The identity modification. -/
@[simps]
def id : Modification η η where app a := 𝟙 (η.app a)
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.modification.id CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.Modification.id
instance : Inhabited (Modification η η) :=
⟨Modification.id η⟩
variable {η}
section
variable (Γ : Modification η θ) {a b c : B} {a' : C}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_naturality (f : a' ⟶ F.obj b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ F.map g ◁ Γ.app c ≫ f ◁ θ.naturality g = f ◁ η.naturality g ≫ f ◁ Γ.app b ▷ G.map g := by
simp_rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, naturality]
#align category_theory.oplax_nat_trans.modification.whisker_left_naturality CategoryTheory.OplaxNatTrans.Modification.whiskerLeft_naturality
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/NaturalTransformation.lean | 252 | 255 | theorem whiskerRight_naturality (f : a ⟶ b) (g : G.obj b ⟶ a') :
F.map f ◁ Γ.app b ▷ g ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ θ.naturality f ▷ g =
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ η.naturality f ▷ g ≫ Γ.app a ▷ G.map f ▷ g := by |
simp_rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle_assoc, ← comp_whiskerRight, naturality]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import topology.uniform_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"195fcd60ff2bfe392543bceb0ec2adcdb472db4c"
/-!
# Uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups. Many concepts directly
generalize to uniform spaces, e.g.
* uniform continuity (in this file)
* completeness (in `Cauchy.lean`)
* extension of uniform continuous functions to complete spaces (in `UniformEmbedding.lean`)
* totally bounded sets (in `Cauchy.lean`)
* totally bounded complete sets are compact (in `Cauchy.lean`)
A uniform structure on a type `X` is a filter `𝓤 X` on `X × X` satisfying some conditions
which makes it reasonable to say that `∀ᶠ (p : X × X) in 𝓤 X, ...` means
"for all p.1 and p.2 in X close enough, ...". Elements of this filter are called entourages
of `X`. The two main examples are:
* If `X` is a metric space, `V ∈ 𝓤 X ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ⊆ V`
* If `G` is an additive topological group, `V ∈ 𝓤 G ↔ ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G), {p | p.2 - p.1 ∈ U} ⊆ V`
Those examples are generalizations in two different directions of the elementary example where
`X = ℝ` and `V ∈ 𝓤 ℝ ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | |p.2 - p.1| < ε } ⊆ V` which features both the topological
group structure on `ℝ` and its metric space structure.
Each uniform structure on `X` induces a topology on `X` characterized by
> `nhds_eq_comap_uniformity : ∀ {x : X}, 𝓝 x = comap (Prod.mk x) (𝓤 X)`
where `Prod.mk x : X → X × X := (fun y ↦ (x, y))` is the partial evaluation of the product
constructor.
The dictionary with metric spaces includes:
* an upper bound for `dist x y` translates into `(x, y) ∈ V` for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`
* a ball `ball x r` roughly corresponds to `UniformSpace.ball x V := {y | (x, y) ∈ V}`
for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`, but the later is more general (it includes in
particular both open and closed balls for suitable `V`).
In particular we have:
`isOpen_iff_ball_subset {s : Set X} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ball x V ⊆ s`
The triangle inequality is abstracted to a statement involving the composition of relations in `X`.
First note that the triangle inequality in a metric space is equivalent to
`∀ (x y z : X) (r r' : ℝ), dist x y ≤ r → dist y z ≤ r' → dist x z ≤ r + r'`.
Then, for any `V` and `W` with type `Set (X × X)`, the composition `V ○ W : Set (X × X)` is
defined as `{ p : X × X | ∃ z, (p.1, z) ∈ V ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ W }`.
In the metric space case, if `V = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r }` and `W = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r' }`
then the triangle inequality, as reformulated above, says `V ○ W` is contained in
`{p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r + r'}` which is the entourage associated to the radius `r + r'`.
In general we have `mem_ball_comp (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) : z ∈ ball x (V ○ W)`.
Note that this discussion does not depend on any axiom imposed on the uniformity filter,
it is simply captured by the definition of composition.
The uniform space axioms ask the filter `𝓤 X` to satisfy the following:
* every `V ∈ 𝓤 X` contains the diagonal `idRel = { p | p.1 = p.2 }`. This abstracts the fact
that `dist x x ≤ r` for every non-negative radius `r` in the metric space case and also that
`x - x` belongs to every neighborhood of zero in the topological group case.
* `V ∈ 𝓤 X → Prod.swap '' V ∈ 𝓤 X`. This is tightly related the fact that `dist x y = dist y x`
in a metric space, and to continuity of negation in the topological group case.
* `∀ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ∃ W ∈ 𝓤 X, W ○ W ⊆ V`. In the metric space case, it corresponds
to cutting the radius of a ball in half and applying the triangle inequality.
In the topological group case, it comes from continuity of addition at `(0, 0)`.
These three axioms are stated more abstractly in the definition below, in terms of
operations on filters, without directly manipulating entourages.
## Main definitions
* `UniformSpace X` is a uniform space structure on a type `X`
* `UniformContinuous f` is a predicate saying a function `f : α → β` between uniform spaces
is uniformly continuous : `∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ (x : α × α) in 𝓤 α, (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r`
In this file we also define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## Implementation notes
There is already a theory of relations in `Data/Rel.lean` where the main definition is
`def Rel (α β : Type*) := α → β → Prop`.
The relations used in the current file involve only one type, but this is not the reason why
we don't reuse `Data/Rel.lean`. We use `Set (α × α)`
instead of `Rel α α` because we really need sets to use the filter library, and elements
of filters on `α × α` have type `Set (α × α)`.
The structure `UniformSpace X` bundles a uniform structure on `X`, a topology on `X` and
an assumption saying those are compatible. This may not seem mathematically reasonable at first,
but is in fact an instance of the forgetful inheritance pattern. See Note [forgetful inheritance]
below.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
/-- The identity relation, or the graph of the identity function -/
def idRel {α : Type*} :=
{ p : α × α | p.1 = p.2 }
#align id_rel idRel
@[simp]
theorem mem_idRel {a b : α} : (a, b) ∈ @idRel α ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_id_rel mem_idRel
@[simp]
theorem idRel_subset {s : Set (α × α)} : idRel ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a, (a, a) ∈ s := by
simp [subset_def]
#align id_rel_subset idRel_subset
/-- The composition of relations -/
def compRel (r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)) :=
{ p : α × α | ∃ z : α, (p.1, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ r₂ }
#align comp_rel compRel
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Uniformity] infixl:62 " ○ " => compRel
open Uniformity
@[simp]
theorem mem_compRel {α : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)} {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ r₁ ○ r₂ ↔ ∃ z, (x, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, y) ∈ r₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_comp_rel mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem swap_idRel : Prod.swap '' idRel = @idRel α :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simpa [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap] using eq_comm
#align swap_id_rel swap_idRel
theorem Monotone.compRel [Preorder β] {f g : β → Set (α × α)} (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ○ g x := fun _ _ h _ ⟨z, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨z, hf h h₁, hg h h₂⟩
#align monotone.comp_rel Monotone.compRel
@[mono]
theorem compRel_mono {f g h k : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : f ⊆ h) (h₂ : g ⊆ k) : f ○ g ⊆ h ○ k :=
fun _ ⟨z, h, h'⟩ => ⟨z, h₁ h, h₂ h'⟩
#align comp_rel_mono compRel_mono
theorem prod_mk_mem_compRel {a b c : α} {s t : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : (a, c) ∈ s) (h₂ : (c, b) ∈ t) :
(a, b) ∈ s ○ t :=
⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩
#align prod_mk_mem_comp_rel prod_mk_mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem id_compRel {r : Set (α × α)} : idRel ○ r = r :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp
#align id_comp_rel id_compRel
theorem compRel_assoc {r s t : Set (α × α)} : r ○ s ○ t = r ○ (s ○ t) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩; simp only [mem_compRel]; tauto
#align comp_rel_assoc compRel_assoc
theorem left_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ t) : s ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨_x, y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨y, xy_in, h <| rfl⟩
#align left_subset_comp_rel left_subset_compRel
theorem right_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : t ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨x, _y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨x, h <| rfl, xy_in⟩
#align right_subset_comp_rel right_subset_compRel
theorem subset_comp_self {s : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
left_subset_compRel h
#align subset_comp_self subset_comp_self
theorem subset_iterate_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) (n : ℕ) :
t ⊆ (s ○ ·)^[n] t := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing t
exacts [Subset.rfl, (right_subset_compRel h).trans ihn]
#align subset_iterate_comp_rel subset_iterate_compRel
/-- The relation is invariant under swapping factors. -/
def SymmetricRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Prop :=
Prod.swap ⁻¹' V = V
#align symmetric_rel SymmetricRel
/-- The maximal symmetric relation contained in a given relation. -/
def symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Set (α × α) :=
V ∩ Prod.swap ⁻¹' V
#align symmetrize_rel symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetric_symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : SymmetricRel (symmetrizeRel V) := by
simp [SymmetricRel, symmetrizeRel, preimage_inter, inter_comm, ← preimage_comp]
#align symmetric_symmetrize_rel symmetric_symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetrizeRel_subset_self (V : Set (α × α)) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ V :=
sep_subset _ _
#align symmetrize_rel_subset_self symmetrizeRel_subset_self
@[mono]
theorem symmetrize_mono {V W : Set (α × α)} (h : V ⊆ W) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ symmetrizeRel W :=
inter_subset_inter h <| preimage_mono h
#align symmetrize_mono symmetrize_mono
theorem SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ V ↔ (y, x) ∈ V :=
Set.ext_iff.1 hV (y, x)
#align symmetric_rel.mk_mem_comm SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm
theorem SymmetricRel.eq {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' U = U :=
hU
#align symmetric_rel.eq SymmetricRel.eq
theorem SymmetricRel.inter {U V : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) (hV : SymmetricRel V) :
SymmetricRel (U ∩ V) := by rw [SymmetricRel, preimage_inter, hU.eq, hV.eq]
#align symmetric_rel.inter SymmetricRel.inter
/-- This core description of a uniform space is outside of the type class hierarchy. It is useful
for constructions of uniform spaces, when the topology is derived from the uniform space. -/
structure UniformSpace.Core (α : Type u) where
/-- The uniformity filter. Once `UniformSpace` is defined, `𝓤 α` (`_root_.uniformity`) becomes the
normal form. -/
uniformity : Filter (α × α)
/-- Every set in the uniformity filter includes the diagonal. -/
refl : 𝓟 idRel ≤ uniformity
/-- If `s ∈ uniformity`, then `Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ∈ uniformity`. -/
symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
/-- For every set `u ∈ uniformity`, there exists `v ∈ uniformity` such that `v ○ v ⊆ u`. -/
comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
#align uniform_space.core UniformSpace.Core
protected theorem UniformSpace.Core.comp_mem_uniformity_sets {c : Core α} {s : Set (α × α)}
(hs : s ∈ c.uniformity) : ∃ t ∈ c.uniformity, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
(mem_lift'_sets <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).mp <| c.comp hs
/-- An alternative constructor for `UniformSpace.Core`. This version unfolds various
`Filter`-related definitions. -/
def UniformSpace.Core.mk' {α : Type u} (U : Filter (α × α)) (refl : ∀ r ∈ U, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r)
(symm : ∀ r ∈ U, Prod.swap ⁻¹' r ∈ U) (comp : ∀ r ∈ U, ∃ t ∈ U, t ○ t ⊆ r) :
UniformSpace.Core α :=
⟨U, fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 (refl _ ru), symm, fun _r ru =>
let ⟨_s, hs, hsr⟩ := comp _ ru
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) hsr⟩
#align uniform_space.core.mk' UniformSpace.Core.mk'
/-- Defining a `UniformSpace.Core` from a filter basis satisfying some uniformity-like axioms. -/
def UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis {α : Type u} (B : FilterBasis (α × α))
(refl : ∀ r ∈ B, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r) (symm : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ Prod.swap ⁻¹' r)
(comp : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ○ t ⊆ r) : UniformSpace.Core α where
uniformity := B.filter
refl := B.hasBasis.ge_iff.mpr fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 <| refl _ ru
symm := (B.hasBasis.tendsto_iff B.hasBasis).mpr symm
comp := (HasBasis.le_basis_iff (B.hasBasis.lift' (monotone_id.compRel monotone_id))
B.hasBasis).2 comp
#align uniform_space.core.mk_of_basis UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis
/-- A uniform space generates a topological space -/
def UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) :
TopologicalSpace α :=
.mkOfNhds fun x ↦ .comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity
#align uniform_space.core.to_topological_space UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace
theorem UniformSpace.Core.ext :
∀ {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace.Core α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align uniform_space.core_eq UniformSpace.Core.ext
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 291 | 299 | theorem UniformSpace.Core.nhds_toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : Core α) (x : α) :
@nhds α u.toTopologicalSpace x = comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity := by |
apply TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun _ ↦ (basis_sets _).comap _)
· exact fun a U hU ↦ u.refl hU rfl
· intro a U hU
rcases u.comp_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with b hb
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with c hc
exact hVU ⟨b, hb, hc⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Units
#align_import algebra.associated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
/-!
# Associated, prime, and irreducible elements.
In this file we define the predicate `Prime p`
saying that an element of a commutative monoid with zero is prime.
Namely, `Prime p` means that `p` isn't zero, it isn't a unit,
and `p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b` for all `a`, `b`;
In decomposition monoids (e.g., `ℕ`, `ℤ`), this predicate is equivalent to `Irreducible`,
however this is not true in general.
We also define an equivalence relation `Associated`
saying that two elements of a monoid differ by a multiplication by a unit.
Then we show that the quotient type `Associates` is a monoid
and prove basic properties of this quotient.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
section Prime
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
/-- An element `p` of a commutative monoid with zero (e.g., a ring) is called *prime*,
if it's not zero, not a unit, and `p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b` for all `a`, `b`. -/
def Prime (p : α) : Prop :=
p ≠ 0 ∧ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b
#align prime Prime
namespace Prime
variable {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
theorem ne_zero : p ≠ 0 :=
hp.1
#align prime.ne_zero Prime.ne_zero
theorem not_unit : ¬IsUnit p :=
hp.2.1
#align prime.not_unit Prime.not_unit
theorem not_dvd_one : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_one ·) hp.not_unit
#align prime.not_dvd_one Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem ne_one : p ≠ 1 := fun h => hp.2.1 (h.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
#align prime.ne_one Prime.ne_one
theorem dvd_or_dvd (hp : Prime p) {a b : α} (h : p ∣ a * b) : p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b :=
hp.2.2 a b h
#align prime.dvd_or_dvd Prime.dvd_or_dvd
theorem dvd_mul {a b : α} : p ∣ a * b ↔ p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b :=
⟨hp.dvd_or_dvd, (Or.elim · (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left · _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right · _))⟩
theorem isPrimal (hp : Prime p) : IsPrimal p := fun _a _b dvd ↦ (hp.dvd_or_dvd dvd).elim
(fun h ↦ ⟨p, 1, h, one_dvd _, (mul_one p).symm⟩) fun h ↦ ⟨1, p, one_dvd _, h, (one_mul p).symm⟩
theorem not_dvd_mul {a b : α} (ha : ¬ p ∣ a) (hb : ¬ p ∣ b) : ¬ p ∣ a * b :=
hp.dvd_mul.not.mpr <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem dvd_of_dvd_pow (hp : Prime p) {a : α} {n : ℕ} (h : p ∣ a ^ n) : p ∣ a := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero] at h
have := isUnit_of_dvd_one h
have := not_unit hp
contradiction
rw [pow_succ'] at h
cases' dvd_or_dvd hp h with dvd_a dvd_pow
· assumption
exact ih dvd_pow
#align prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow
theorem dvd_pow_iff_dvd {a : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∣ a ^ n ↔ p ∣ a :=
⟨hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow, (dvd_pow · hn)⟩
end Prime
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime (0 : α) := fun h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align not_prime_zero not_prime_zero
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime (1 : α) := fun h => h.not_unit isUnit_one
#align not_prime_one not_prime_one
section Map
variable [CommMonoidWithZero β] {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [FunLike F α β]
variable [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β] [FunLike G β α] [MulHomClass G β α]
variable (f : F) (g : G) {p : α}
theorem comap_prime (hinv : ∀ a, g (f a : β) = a) (hp : Prime (f p)) : Prime p :=
⟨fun h => hp.1 <| by simp [h], fun h => hp.2.1 <| h.map f, fun a b h => by
refine
(hp.2.2 (f a) (f b) <| by
convert map_dvd f h
simp).imp
?_ ?_ <;>
· intro h
convert ← map_dvd g h <;> apply hinv⟩
#align comap_prime comap_prime
theorem MulEquiv.prime_iff (e : α ≃* β) : Prime p ↔ Prime (e p) :=
⟨fun h => (comap_prime e.symm e fun a => by simp) <| (e.symm_apply_apply p).substr h,
comap_prime e e.symm fun a => by simp⟩
#align mul_equiv.prime_iff MulEquiv.prime_iff
end Map
end Prime
theorem Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
{a b : α} : a ∣ p * b → p ∣ a ∨ a ∣ b := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
rcases hp.2.2 a c (hc ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _) with (h | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' hp.ne_zero] at hc
exact Or.inr (hc.symm ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ a) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ b := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero]
exact one_dvd b
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := ih (dvd_trans (pow_dvd_pow p n.le_succ) h')
rw [pow_succ]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left _ ((hp.dvd_or_dvd _).resolve_left h)
rwa [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero), ← pow_succ, mul_left_comm]
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ b) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ a := by
rw [mul_comm] at h'
exact hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left n h h'
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
theorem Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α}
{n : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hpow : p ^ n.succ ∣ a ^ n.succ * b ^ n) (hb : ¬p ^ 2 ∣ b) : p ∣ a := by
-- Suppose `p ∣ b`, write `b = p * x` and `hy : a ^ n.succ * b ^ n = p ^ n.succ * y`.
cases' hp.dvd_or_dvd ((dvd_pow_self p (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).trans hpow) with H hbdiv
· exact hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow H
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hbdiv
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hpow
-- Then we can divide out a common factor of `p ^ n` from the equation `hy`.
have : a ^ n.succ * x ^ n = p * y := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero) ?_
rw [← mul_assoc _ p, ← pow_succ, ← hy, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc (a ^ n.succ), mul_comm _ (p ^ n),
mul_assoc]
-- So `p ∣ a` (and we're done) or `p ∣ x`, which can't be the case since it implies `p^2 ∣ b`.
refine hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow ((hp.dvd_or_dvd ⟨_, this⟩).resolve_right fun hdvdx => hb ?_)
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hdvdx
rw [pow_two, ← mul_assoc]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd
theorem prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p x y : α} (h : Prime p)
{i : ℕ} (hxy : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x * y) : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x ∨ p ∣ y := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro hy
induction' i with i ih generalizing x
· rw [pow_one] at hxy ⊢
exact (h.dvd_or_dvd hxy).resolve_right hy
rw [pow_succ'] at hxy ⊢
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := (h.dvd_or_dvd (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd hxy)).resolve_right hy
rw [mul_assoc] at hxy
exact mul_dvd_mul_left p (ih ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h.ne_zero).mp hxy))
#align prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul
/-- `Irreducible p` states that `p` is non-unit and only factors into units.
We explicitly avoid stating that `p` is non-zero, this would require a semiring. Assuming only a
monoid allows us to reuse irreducible for associated elements.
-/
structure Irreducible [Monoid α] (p : α) : Prop where
/-- `p` is not a unit -/
not_unit : ¬IsUnit p
/-- if `p` factors then one factor is a unit -/
isUnit_or_isUnit' : ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b
#align irreducible Irreducible
namespace Irreducible
theorem not_dvd_one [CommMonoid α] {p : α} (hp : Irreducible p) : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_one ·) hp.not_unit
#align irreducible.not_dvd_one Irreducible.not_dvd_one
theorem isUnit_or_isUnit [Monoid α] {p : α} (hp : Irreducible p) {a b : α} (h : p = a * b) :
IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
hp.isUnit_or_isUnit' a b h
#align irreducible.is_unit_or_is_unit Irreducible.isUnit_or_isUnit
end Irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p : α} :
Irreducible p ↔ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
#align irreducible_iff irreducible_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_one [Monoid α] : ¬Irreducible (1 : α) := by simp [irreducible_iff]
#align not_irreducible_one not_irreducible_one
theorem Irreducible.ne_one [Monoid α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 1
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_one hp
#align irreducible.ne_one Irreducible.ne_one
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ¬Irreducible (0 : α)
| ⟨hn0, h⟩ =>
have : IsUnit (0 : α) ∨ IsUnit (0 : α) := h 0 0 (mul_zero 0).symm
this.elim hn0 hn0
#align not_irreducible_zero not_irreducible_zero
theorem Irreducible.ne_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 0
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_zero hp
#align irreducible.ne_zero Irreducible.ne_zero
theorem of_irreducible_mul {α} [Monoid α] {x y : α} : Irreducible (x * y) → IsUnit x ∨ IsUnit y
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h _ _ rfl
#align of_irreducible_mul of_irreducible_mul
theorem not_irreducible_pow {α} [Monoid α] {x : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) :
¬ Irreducible (x ^ n) := by
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
have := h₂ _ _ (pow_succ _ _)
rw [isUnit_pow_iff (Nat.succ_ne_succ.mp hn), or_self] at this
exact h₁ (this.pow _)
#noalign of_irreducible_pow
theorem irreducible_or_factor {α} [Monoid α] (x : α) (h : ¬IsUnit x) :
Irreducible x ∨ ∃ a b, ¬IsUnit a ∧ ¬IsUnit b ∧ a * b = x := by
haveI := Classical.dec
refine or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun H => ?_
simp? [h, irreducible_iff] at H ⊢ says
simp only [exists_and_left, not_exists, not_and, irreducible_iff, h, not_false_eq_true,
true_and] at H ⊢
refine fun a b h => by_contradiction fun o => ?_
simp? [not_or] at o says simp only [not_or] at o
exact H _ o.1 _ o.2 h.symm
#align irreducible_or_factor irreducible_or_factor
/-- If `p` and `q` are irreducible, then `p ∣ q` implies `q ∣ p`. -/
theorem Irreducible.dvd_symm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q → q ∣ p := by
rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
rw [IsUnit.mul_right_dvd (Or.resolve_left (of_irreducible_mul hq) hp.not_unit)]
#align irreducible.dvd_symm Irreducible.dvd_symm
theorem Irreducible.dvd_comm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q ↔ q ∣ p :=
⟨hp.dvd_symm hq, hq.dvd_symm hp⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_comm Irreducible.dvd_comm
section
variable [Monoid α]
theorem irreducible_units_mul (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (↑a * b) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_units_mul, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← a.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← a⁻¹.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align irreducible_units_mul irreducible_units_mul
theorem irreducible_isUnit_mul {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_units_mul a b
#align irreducible_is_unit_mul irreducible_isUnit_mul
theorem irreducible_mul_units (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (b * ↑a) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_mul_units, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a⁻¹]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]
#align irreducible_mul_units irreducible_mul_units
theorem irreducible_mul_isUnit {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (b * a) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_mul_units a b
#align irreducible_mul_is_unit irreducible_mul_isUnit
theorem irreducible_mul_iff {a b : α} :
Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible a ∧ IsUnit b ∨ Irreducible b ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· refine fun h => Or.imp (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (h.isUnit_or_isUnit rfl).symm
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit h'] at h
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul h'] at h
· rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩ | ⟨hb, ha⟩)
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit hb]
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul ha]
#align irreducible_mul_iff irreducible_mul_iff
end
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a : α}
theorem Irreducible.not_square (ha : Irreducible a) : ¬IsSquare a := by
rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq]
rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact not_irreducible_pow (by decide) ha
#align irreducible.not_square Irreducible.not_square
theorem IsSquare.not_irreducible (ha : IsSquare a) : ¬Irreducible a := fun h => h.not_square ha
#align is_square.not_irreducible IsSquare.not_irreducible
end CommMonoid
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
theorem Irreducible.prime_of_isPrimal {a : α}
(irr : Irreducible a) (primal : IsPrimal a) : Prime a :=
⟨irr.ne_zero, irr.not_unit, fun a b dvd ↦ by
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ := primal dvd
exact (of_irreducible_mul irr).symm.imp (·.mul_right_dvd.mpr h₁) (·.mul_left_dvd.mpr h₂)⟩
theorem Irreducible.prime [DecompositionMonoid α] {a : α} (irr : Irreducible a) : Prime a :=
irr.prime_of_isPrimal (DecompositionMonoid.primal a)
end CommMonoidWithZero
section CancelCommMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a p : α}
protected theorem Prime.irreducible (hp : Prime p) : Irreducible p :=
⟨hp.not_unit, fun a b ↦ by
rintro rfl
exact (hp.dvd_or_dvd dvd_rfl).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_dvd_one <| (mul_dvd_mul_iff_right <| right_ne_zero_of_mul hp.ne_zero).mp <|
dvd_mul_of_dvd_right · _)
(isUnit_of_dvd_one <| (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left <| left_ne_zero_of_mul hp.ne_zero).mp <|
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left · _)⟩
#align prime.irreducible Prime.irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff_prime [DecompositionMonoid α] {a : α} : Irreducible a ↔ Prime a :=
⟨Irreducible.prime, Prime.irreducible⟩
theorem succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul (hp : Prime p) {a b : α} {k l : ℕ} :
p ^ k ∣ a → p ^ l ∣ b → p ^ (k + l + 1) ∣ a * b → p ^ (k + 1) ∣ a ∨ p ^ (l + 1) ∣ b :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ⟨z, hz⟩ =>
have h : p ^ (k + l) * (x * y) = p ^ (k + l) * (p * z) := by
simpa [mul_comm, pow_add, hx, hy, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm] using hz
have hp0 : p ^ (k + l) ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero
have hpd : p ∣ x * y := ⟨z, by rwa [mul_right_inj' hp0] at h⟩
(hp.dvd_or_dvd hpd).elim
(fun ⟨d, hd⟩ => Or.inl ⟨d, by simp [*, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]⟩)
fun ⟨d, hd⟩ => Or.inr ⟨d, by simp [*, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]⟩
#align succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.not_square (hp : Prime p) : ¬IsSquare p :=
hp.irreducible.not_square
#align prime.not_square Prime.not_square
theorem IsSquare.not_prime (ha : IsSquare a) : ¬Prime a := fun h => h.not_square ha
#align is_square.not_prime IsSquare.not_prime
theorem not_prime_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ¬Prime (a ^ n) := fun hp =>
not_irreducible_pow hn hp.irreducible
#align pow_not_prime not_prime_pow
end CancelCommMonoidWithZero
/-- Two elements of a `Monoid` are `Associated` if one of them is another one
multiplied by a unit on the right. -/
def Associated [Monoid α] (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ u : αˣ, x * u = y
#align associated Associated
/-- Notation for two elements of a monoid are associated, i.e.
if one of them is another one multiplied by a unit on the right. -/
local infixl:50 " ~ᵤ " => Associated
namespace Associated
@[refl]
protected theorem refl [Monoid α] (x : α) : x ~ᵤ x :=
⟨1, by simp⟩
#align associated.refl Associated.refl
protected theorem rfl [Monoid α] {x : α} : x ~ᵤ x :=
.refl x
instance [Monoid α] : IsRefl α Associated :=
⟨Associated.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm [Monoid α] : ∀ {x y : α}, x ~ᵤ y → y ~ᵤ x
| x, _, ⟨u, rfl⟩ => ⟨u⁻¹, by rw [mul_assoc, Units.mul_inv, mul_one]⟩
#align associated.symm Associated.symm
instance [Monoid α] : IsSymm α Associated :=
⟨fun _ _ => Associated.symm⟩
protected theorem comm [Monoid α] {x y : α} : x ~ᵤ y ↔ y ~ᵤ x :=
⟨Associated.symm, Associated.symm⟩
#align associated.comm Associated.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans [Monoid α] : ∀ {x y z : α}, x ~ᵤ y → y ~ᵤ z → x ~ᵤ z
| x, _, _, ⟨u, rfl⟩, ⟨v, rfl⟩ => ⟨u * v, by rw [Units.val_mul, mul_assoc]⟩
#align associated.trans Associated.trans
instance [Monoid α] : IsTrans α Associated :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => Associated.trans⟩
/-- The setoid of the relation `x ~ᵤ y` iff there is a unit `u` such that `x * u = y` -/
protected def setoid (α : Type*) [Monoid α] :
Setoid α where
r := Associated
iseqv := ⟨Associated.refl, Associated.symm, Associated.trans⟩
#align associated.setoid Associated.setoid
theorem map {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N]
(f : F) {x y : M} (ha : Associated x y) : Associated (f x) (f y) := by
obtain ⟨u, ha⟩ := ha
exact ⟨Units.map f u, by rw [← ha, map_mul, Units.coe_map, MonoidHom.coe_coe]⟩
end Associated
attribute [local instance] Associated.setoid
theorem unit_associated_one [Monoid α] {u : αˣ} : (u : α) ~ᵤ 1 :=
⟨u⁻¹, Units.mul_inv u⟩
#align unit_associated_one unit_associated_one
@[simp]
theorem associated_one_iff_isUnit [Monoid α] {a : α} : (a : α) ~ᵤ 1 ↔ IsUnit a :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨c, h⟩ := h.symm
h ▸ ⟨c, (one_mul _).symm⟩)
fun ⟨c, h⟩ => Associated.symm ⟨c, by simp [h]⟩
#align associated_one_iff_is_unit associated_one_iff_isUnit
@[simp]
theorem associated_zero_iff_eq_zero [MonoidWithZero α] (a : α) : a ~ᵤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨u, h⟩ := h.symm
simpa using h.symm)
fun h => h ▸ Associated.refl a
#align associated_zero_iff_eq_zero associated_zero_iff_eq_zero
theorem associated_one_of_mul_eq_one [CommMonoid α] {a : α} (b : α) (hab : a * b = 1) : a ~ᵤ 1 :=
show (Units.mkOfMulEqOne a b hab : α) ~ᵤ 1 from unit_associated_one
#align associated_one_of_mul_eq_one associated_one_of_mul_eq_one
theorem associated_one_of_associated_mul_one [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} : a * b ~ᵤ 1 → a ~ᵤ 1
| ⟨u, h⟩ => associated_one_of_mul_eq_one (b * u) <| by simpa [mul_assoc] using h
#align associated_one_of_associated_mul_one associated_one_of_associated_mul_one
theorem associated_mul_unit_left {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) a :=
let ⟨u', hu⟩ := hu
⟨u'⁻¹, hu ▸ Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _⟩
#align associated_mul_unit_left associated_mul_unit_left
theorem associated_unit_mul_left {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) a := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu
#align associated_unit_mul_left associated_unit_mul_left
theorem associated_mul_unit_right {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (a * u) :=
(associated_mul_unit_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_mul_unit_right associated_mul_unit_right
theorem associated_unit_mul_right {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * a) :=
(associated_unit_mul_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_unit_mul_right associated_unit_mul_right
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
⟨(associated_mul_unit_right _ _ hu).trans, (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu).trans⟩
#align associated_mul_is_unit_left_iff associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {u a b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) b ↔ Associated a b := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu
#align associated_is_unit_mul_left_iff associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b u : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_mul_is_unit_right_iff associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_is_unit_mul_right_iff associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_left_iff associated_mul_unit_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (↑u * a) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_left_iff associated_unit_mul_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_right_iff associated_mul_unit_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (↑u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_right_iff associated_unit_mul_right_iff
theorem Associated.mul_left [Monoid α] (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a * b ~ᵤ a * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_left Associated.mul_left
theorem Associated.mul_right [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) (c : α) : a * c ~ᵤ b * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_right_comm _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_right Associated.mul_right
theorem Associated.mul_mul [CommMonoid α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
(h₁ : a₁ ~ᵤ b₁) (h₂ : a₂ ~ᵤ b₂) : a₁ * a₂ ~ᵤ b₁ * b₂ := (h₁.mul_right _).trans (h₂.mul_left _)
#align associated.mul_mul Associated.mul_mul
theorem Associated.pow_pow [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ^ n ~ᵤ b ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp [Associated.refl]
convert h.mul_mul ih <;> rw [pow_succ']
#align associated.pow_pow Associated.pow_pow
protected theorem Associated.dvd [Monoid α] {a b : α} : a ~ᵤ b → a ∣ b := fun ⟨u, hu⟩ =>
⟨u, hu.symm⟩
#align associated.dvd Associated.dvd
protected theorem Associated.dvd' [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : b ∣ a :=
h.symm.dvd
protected theorem Associated.dvd_dvd [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ∣ b ∧ b ∣ a :=
⟨h.dvd, h.symm.dvd⟩
#align associated.dvd_dvd Associated.dvd_dvd
theorem associated_of_dvd_dvd [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
a ~ᵤ b := by
rcases hab with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases hba with ⟨d, a_eq⟩
by_cases ha0 : a = 0
· simp_all
have hac0 : a * c ≠ 0 := by
intro con
rw [con, zero_mul] at a_eq
apply ha0 a_eq
have : a * (c * d) = a * 1 := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← a_eq, mul_one]
have hcd : c * d = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ ha0 this
have : a * c * (d * c) = a * c * 1 := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← a_eq, mul_one]
have hdc : d * c = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hac0 this
exact ⟨⟨c, d, hcd, hdc⟩, rfl⟩
#align associated_of_dvd_dvd associated_of_dvd_dvd
theorem dvd_dvd_iff_associated [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} : a ∣ b ∧ b ∣ a ↔ a ~ᵤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => associated_of_dvd_dvd h1 h2, Associated.dvd_dvd⟩
#align dvd_dvd_iff_associated dvd_dvd_iff_associated
instance [CancelMonoidWithZero α] [DecidableRel ((· ∣ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
DecidableRel ((· ~ᵤ ·) : α → α → Prop) := fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff _ dvd_dvd_iff_associated
theorem Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left [Monoid α] {a b c : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ∣ c ↔ b ∣ c :=
let ⟨_, hu⟩ := h
hu ▸ Units.mul_right_dvd.symm
#align associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left
theorem Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right [Monoid α] {a b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ c :=
let ⟨_, hu⟩ := h
hu ▸ Units.dvd_mul_right.symm
#align associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right
theorem Associated.eq_zero_iff [MonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [← Units.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq, zero_mul]
#align associated.eq_zero_iff Associated.eq_zero_iff
theorem Associated.ne_zero_iff [MonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ≠ 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 :=
not_congr h.eq_zero_iff
#align associated.ne_zero_iff Associated.ne_zero_iff
theorem Associated.neg_left [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated (-a) b :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h; ⟨-u, by simp [hu]⟩
theorem Associated.neg_right [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated a (-b) :=
h.symm.neg_left.symm
theorem Associated.neg_neg [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated (-a) (-b) :=
h.neg_left.neg_right
protected theorem Associated.prime [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) (hp : Prime p) :
Prime q :=
⟨h.ne_zero_iff.1 hp.ne_zero,
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
⟨fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => hp.not_unit ⟨v * u⁻¹, by simp [hv, hu.symm]⟩,
hu ▸ by
simp only [IsUnit.mul_iff, Units.isUnit, and_true, IsUnit.mul_right_dvd]
intro a b
exact hp.dvd_or_dvd⟩⟩
#align associated.prime Associated.prime
theorem prime_mul_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {x y : α} :
Prime (x * y) ↔ (Prime x ∧ IsUnit y) ∨ (IsUnit x ∧ Prime y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases of_irreducible_mul h.irreducible with hx | hy
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, (associated_unit_mul_left y x hx).prime h⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨(associated_mul_unit_left x y hy).prime h, hy⟩
· rintro (⟨hx, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, hy⟩)
· exact (associated_mul_unit_left x y hy).symm.prime hx
· exact (associated_unit_mul_right y x hx).prime hy
@[simp]
lemma prime_pow_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} {n : ℕ} :
Prime (p ^ n) ↔ Prime p ∧ n = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, fun ⟨hp, hn⟩ ↦ by simpa [hn]⟩
suffices n = 1 by aesop
cases' n with n
· simp at hp
· rw [Nat.succ.injEq]
rw [pow_succ', prime_mul_iff] at hp
rcases hp with ⟨hp, hpn⟩ | ⟨hp, hpn⟩
· by_contra contra
rw [isUnit_pow_iff contra] at hpn
exact hp.not_unit hpn
· exfalso
exact hpn.not_unit (hp.pow n)
theorem Irreducible.dvd_iff [Monoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
y ∣ x ↔ IsUnit y ∨ Associated x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
obtain (h|h) := hx.isUnit_or_isUnit hz
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [hz]
exact Or.inr (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ h)
· rintro (hy|h)
· exact hy.dvd
· exact h.symm.dvd
theorem Irreducible.associated_of_dvd [Monoid α] {p q : α} (p_irr : Irreducible p)
(q_irr : Irreducible q) (dvd : p ∣ q) : Associated p q :=
((q_irr.dvd_iff.mp dvd).resolve_left p_irr.not_unit).symm
#align irreducible.associated_of_dvd Irreducible.associated_of_dvdₓ
theorem Irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated [Monoid α] {p q : α}
(pp : Irreducible p) (qp : Irreducible q) : p ∣ q ↔ Associated p q :=
⟨Irreducible.associated_of_dvd pp qp, Associated.dvd⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated Irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated
theorem Prime.associated_of_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (p_prime : Prime p)
(q_prime : Prime q) (dvd : p ∣ q) : Associated p q :=
p_prime.irreducible.associated_of_dvd q_prime.irreducible dvd
#align prime.associated_of_dvd Prime.associated_of_dvd
theorem Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (pp : Prime p)
(qp : Prime q) : p ∣ q ↔ Associated p q :=
pp.irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated qp.irreducible
#align prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated
theorem Associated.prime_iff [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) : Prime p ↔ Prime q :=
⟨h.prime, h.symm.prime⟩
#align associated.prime_iff Associated.prime_iff
protected theorem Associated.isUnit [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : IsUnit a → IsUnit b :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => ⟨v * u, by simp [hv, hu.symm]⟩
#align associated.is_unit Associated.isUnit
theorem Associated.isUnit_iff [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : IsUnit a ↔ IsUnit b :=
⟨h.isUnit, h.symm.isUnit⟩
#align associated.is_unit_iff Associated.isUnit_iff
theorem Irreducible.isUnit_iff_not_associated_of_dvd [Monoid α]
{x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) (hy : y ∣ x) : IsUnit y ↔ ¬ Associated x y :=
⟨fun hy hxy => hx.1 (hxy.symm.isUnit hy), (hx.dvd_iff.mp hy).resolve_right⟩
protected theorem Associated.irreducible [Monoid α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) (hp : Irreducible p) :
Irreducible q :=
⟨mt h.symm.isUnit hp.1,
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
fun a b hab =>
have hpab : p = a * (b * (u⁻¹ : αˣ)) :=
calc
p = p * u * (u⁻¹ : αˣ) := by simp
_ = _ := by rw [hu]; simp [hab, mul_assoc]
(hp.isUnit_or_isUnit hpab).elim Or.inl fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => Or.inr ⟨v * u, by simp [hv]⟩⟩
#align associated.irreducible Associated.irreducible
protected theorem Associated.irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) :
Irreducible p ↔ Irreducible q :=
⟨h.irreducible, h.symm.irreducible⟩
#align associated.irreducible_iff Associated.irreducible_iff
theorem Associated.of_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b ~ᵤ c * d)
(h₁ : a ~ᵤ c) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b ~ᵤ d :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := Associated.symm h₁
⟨u * (v : αˣ),
mul_left_cancel₀ ha
(by
rw [← hv, mul_assoc c (v : α) d, mul_left_comm c, ← hu]
simp [hv.symm, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm])⟩
#align associated.of_mul_left Associated.of_mul_left
theorem Associated.of_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d : α} :
a * b ~ᵤ c * d → b ~ᵤ d → b ≠ 0 → a ~ᵤ c := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm c]; exact Associated.of_mul_left
#align associated.of_mul_right Associated.of_mul_right
theorem Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p₁ p₂ : α} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
(hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₁) (h : p₁ ^ k₁ ~ᵤ p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ ~ᵤ p₂ := by
have : p₁ ∣ p₂ ^ k₂ := by
rw [← h.dvd_iff_dvd_right]
apply dvd_pow_self _ hk₁.ne'
rw [← hp₁.dvd_prime_iff_associated hp₂]
exact hp₁.dvd_of_dvd_pow this
#align associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime
theorem Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime' [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p₁ p₂ : α} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
(hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₂ : 0 < k₂) (h : p₁ ^ k₁ ~ᵤ p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ ~ᵤ p₂ :=
(h.symm.of_pow_associated_of_prime hp₂ hp₁ hk₂).symm
#align associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime' Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime'
/-- See also `Irreducible.coprime_iff_not_dvd`. -/
lemma Irreducible.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd [Monoid α] {p n : α} (hp : Irreducible p) :
IsRelPrime p n ↔ ¬ p ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h contra ↦ hp.not_unit (h dvd_rfl contra), fun hpn d hdp hdn ↦ ?_⟩
contrapose! hpn
suffices Associated p d from this.dvd.trans hdn
exact (hp.dvd_iff.mp hdp).resolve_left hpn
lemma Irreducible.dvd_or_isRelPrime [Monoid α] {p n : α} (hp : Irreducible p) :
p ∣ n ∨ IsRelPrime p n := Classical.or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr hp.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd.2
section UniqueUnits
variable [Monoid α] [Unique αˣ]
theorem associated_iff_eq {x y : α} : x ~ᵤ y ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [units_eq_one c, Units.val_one, mul_one]
· rintro rfl
rfl
#align associated_iff_eq associated_iff_eq
theorem associated_eq_eq : (Associated : α → α → Prop) = Eq := by
ext
rw [associated_iff_eq]
#align associated_eq_eq associated_eq_eq
theorem prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq {M : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero M] [Unique Mˣ] {p q : M}
(pp : Prime p) (qp : Prime q) : p ∣ q ↔ p = q := by
rw [pp.dvd_prime_iff_associated qp, ← associated_eq_eq]
#align prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq
end UniqueUnits
section UniqueUnits₀
variable {R : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] [Unique Rˣ] {p₁ p₂ : R} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
theorem eq_of_prime_pow_eq (hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₁)
(h : p₁ ^ k₁ = p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq] at h ⊢
apply h.of_pow_associated_of_prime hp₁ hp₂ hk₁
#align eq_of_prime_pow_eq eq_of_prime_pow_eq
theorem eq_of_prime_pow_eq' (hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₂)
(h : p₁ ^ k₁ = p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq] at h ⊢
apply h.of_pow_associated_of_prime' hp₁ hp₂ hk₁
#align eq_of_prime_pow_eq' eq_of_prime_pow_eq'
end UniqueUnits₀
/-- The quotient of a monoid by the `Associated` relation. Two elements `x` and `y`
are associated iff there is a unit `u` such that `x * u = y`. There is a natural
monoid structure on `Associates α`. -/
abbrev Associates (α : Type*) [Monoid α] : Type _ :=
Quotient (Associated.setoid α)
#align associates Associates
namespace Associates
open Associated
/-- The canonical quotient map from a monoid `α` into the `Associates` of `α` -/
protected abbrev mk {α : Type*} [Monoid α] (a : α) : Associates α :=
⟦a⟧
#align associates.mk Associates.mk
instance [Monoid α] : Inhabited (Associates α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff_associated [Monoid α] {a b : α} : Associates.mk a = Associates.mk b ↔ a ~ᵤ b :=
Iff.intro Quotient.exact Quot.sound
#align associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated
theorem quotient_mk_eq_mk [Monoid α] (a : α) : ⟦a⟧ = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk [Monoid α] (a : α) : Quot.mk Setoid.r a = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.quot_mk_eq_mk Associates.quot_mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem quot_out [Monoid α] (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk (Quot.out a) = a := by
rw [← quot_mk_eq_mk, Quot.out_eq]
#align associates.quot_out Associates.quot_outₓ
theorem mk_quot_out [Monoid α] (a : α) : Quot.out (Associates.mk a) ~ᵤ a := by
rw [← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, Associates.quot_out]
theorem forall_associated [Monoid α] {p : Associates α → Prop} :
(∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, p (Associates.mk a) :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ => h _) fun h a => Quotient.inductionOn a h
#align associates.forall_associated Associates.forall_associated
theorem mk_surjective [Monoid α] : Function.Surjective (@Associates.mk α _) :=
forall_associated.2 fun a => ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align associates.mk_surjective Associates.mk_surjective
instance [Monoid α] : One (Associates α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_one [Monoid α] : Associates.mk (1 : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_one Associates.mk_one
theorem one_eq_mk_one [Monoid α] : (1 : Associates α) = Associates.mk 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.one_eq_mk_one Associates.one_eq_mk_one
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_one [Monoid α] {a : α} : Associates.mk a = 1 ↔ IsUnit a := by
rw [← mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, associated_one_iff_isUnit]
instance [Monoid α] : Bot (Associates α) :=
⟨1⟩
theorem bot_eq_one [Monoid α] : (⊥ : Associates α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.bot_eq_one Associates.bot_eq_one
theorem exists_rep [Monoid α] (a : Associates α) : ∃ a0 : α, Associates.mk a0 = a :=
Quot.exists_rep a
#align associates.exists_rep Associates.exists_rep
instance [Monoid α] [Subsingleton α] :
Unique (Associates α) where
default := 1
uniq := forall_associated.2 fun _ ↦ mk_eq_one.2 <| isUnit_of_subsingleton _
theorem mk_injective [Monoid α] [Unique (Units α)] : Function.Injective (@Associates.mk α _) :=
fun _ _ h => associated_iff_eq.mp (Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.mp h)
#align associates.mk_injective Associates.mk_injective
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
instance instMul : Mul (Associates α) :=
⟨Quotient.map₂ (· * ·) fun _ _ h₁ _ _ h₂ ↦ h₁.mul_mul h₂⟩
theorem mk_mul_mk {x y : α} : Associates.mk x * Associates.mk y = Associates.mk (x * y) :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_mul_mk Associates.mk_mul_mk
instance instCommMonoid : CommMonoid (Associates α) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
mul_one a' := Quotient.inductionOn a' fun a => show ⟦a * 1⟧ = ⟦a⟧ by simp
one_mul a' := Quotient.inductionOn a' fun a => show ⟦1 * a⟧ = ⟦a⟧ by simp
mul_assoc a' b' c' :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a' b' c' fun a b c =>
show ⟦a * b * c⟧ = ⟦a * (b * c)⟧ by rw [mul_assoc]
mul_comm a' b' :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a' b' fun a b => show ⟦a * b⟧ = ⟦b * a⟧ by rw [mul_comm]
instance instPreorder : Preorder (Associates α) where
le := Dvd.dvd
le_refl := dvd_refl
le_trans a b c := dvd_trans
/-- `Associates.mk` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
protected def mkMonoidHom : α →* Associates α where
toFun := Associates.mk
map_one' := mk_one
map_mul' _ _ := mk_mul_mk
#align associates.mk_monoid_hom Associates.mkMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem mkMonoidHom_apply (a : α) : Associates.mkMonoidHom a = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_monoid_hom_apply Associates.mkMonoidHom_apply
theorem associated_map_mk {f : Associates α →* α} (hinv : Function.RightInverse f Associates.mk)
(a : α) : a ~ᵤ f (Associates.mk a) :=
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.1 (hinv (Associates.mk a)).symm
#align associates.associated_map_mk Associates.associated_map_mk
theorem mk_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : Associates.mk (a ^ n) = Associates.mk a ^ n := by
induction n <;> simp [*, pow_succ, Associates.mk_mul_mk.symm]
#align associates.mk_pow Associates.mk_pow
theorem dvd_eq_le : ((· ∣ ·) : Associates α → Associates α → Prop) = (· ≤ ·) :=
rfl
#align associates.dvd_eq_le Associates.dvd_eq_le
theorem mul_eq_one_iff {x y : Associates α} : x * y = 1 ↔ x = 1 ∧ y = 1 :=
Iff.intro
(Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun a b h =>
have : a * b ~ᵤ 1 := Quotient.exact h
⟨Quotient.sound <| associated_one_of_associated_mul_one this,
Quotient.sound <| associated_one_of_associated_mul_one <| by rwa [mul_comm] at this⟩)
(by simp (config := { contextual := true }))
#align associates.mul_eq_one_iff Associates.mul_eq_one_iff
theorem units_eq_one (u : (Associates α)ˣ) : u = 1 :=
Units.ext (mul_eq_one_iff.1 u.val_inv).1
#align associates.units_eq_one Associates.units_eq_one
instance uniqueUnits : Unique (Associates α)ˣ where
default := 1
uniq := Associates.units_eq_one
#align associates.unique_units Associates.uniqueUnits
@[simp]
theorem coe_unit_eq_one (u : (Associates α)ˣ) : (u : Associates α) = 1 := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align associates.coe_unit_eq_one Associates.coe_unit_eq_one
theorem isUnit_iff_eq_one (a : Associates α) : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ coe_unit_eq_one _) fun h => h.symm ▸ isUnit_one
#align associates.is_unit_iff_eq_one Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one
theorem isUnit_iff_eq_bot {a : Associates α} : IsUnit a ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one, bot_eq_one]
#align associates.is_unit_iff_eq_bot Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_bot
| Mathlib/Algebra/Associated.lean | 989 | 993 | theorem isUnit_mk {a : α} : IsUnit (Associates.mk a) ↔ IsUnit a :=
calc
IsUnit (Associates.mk a) ↔ a ~ᵤ 1 := by |
rw [isUnit_iff_eq_one, one_eq_mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
_ ↔ IsUnit a := associated_one_iff_isUnit
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
#align_import geometry.manifold.smooth_manifold_with_corners from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ddec54a71a0dd025c05445d467f1a2b7d586a3ba"
/-!
# Smooth manifolds (possibly with boundary or corners)
A smooth manifold is a manifold modelled on a normed vector space, or a subset like a
half-space (to get manifolds with boundaries) for which the changes of coordinates are smooth maps.
We define a model with corners as a map `I : H → E` embedding nicely the topological space `H` in
the vector space `E` (or more precisely as a structure containing all the relevant properties).
Given such a model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of local
homeomorphisms of `H` which are smooth when read in `E` (for any regularity `n : ℕ∞`).
With this groupoid at hand and the general machinery of charted spaces, we thus get the notion
of `C^n` manifold with respect to any model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`. We also introduce a
specific type class for `C^∞` manifolds as these are the most commonly used.
Some texts assume manifolds to be Hausdorff and secound countable. We (in mathlib) assume neither,
but add these assumptions later as needed. (Quite a few results still do not require them.)
## Main definitions
* `ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H` :
a structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space E over the field `𝕜`. This is all that is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
* `modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E` :
trivial model with corners structure on the space `E` embedded in itself by the identity.
* `contDiffGroupoid n I` :
when `I` is a model with corners on `(𝕜, E, H)`, this is the groupoid of partial homeos of `H`
which are of class `C^n` over the normed field `𝕜`, when read in `E`.
* `SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M` :
a type class saying that the charted space `M`, modelled on the space `H`, has `C^∞` changes of
coordinates with respect to the model with corners `I` on `(𝕜, E, H)`. This type class is just
a shortcut for `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)`.
* `extChartAt I x`:
in a smooth manifold with corners with the model `I` on `(E, H)`, the charts take values in `H`,
but often we may want to use their `E`-valued version, obtained by composing the charts with `I`.
Since the target is in general not open, we can not register them as partial homeomorphisms, but
we register them as `PartialEquiv`s.
`extChartAt I x` is the canonical such partial equiv around `x`.
As specific examples of models with corners, we define (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Real`)
* `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` for the model space used to define
`n`-dimensional real manifolds without boundary (with notation `𝓡 n` in the locale `Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanHalfSpace n)` for the model space
used to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with boundary (with notation `𝓡∂ n` in the locale
`Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanQuadrant n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with corners
With these definitions at hand, to invoke an `n`-dimensional real manifold without boundary,
one could use
`variable {n : ℕ} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners (𝓡 n) M]`.
However, this is not the recommended way: a theorem proved using this assumption would not apply
for instance to the tangent space of such a manifold, which is modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` and not on `EuclideanSpace (Fin (2 * n))`!
In the same way, it would not apply to product manifolds, modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin m))`.
The right invocation does not focus on one specific construction, but on all constructions sharing
the right properties, like
`variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E E} [I.Boundaryless]
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace E M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]`
Here, `I.Boundaryless` is a typeclass property ensuring that there is no boundary (this is for
instance the case for `modelWithCornersSelf`, or products of these). Note that one could consider
as a natural assumption to only use the trivial model with corners `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ E`,
but again in product manifolds the natural model with corners will not be this one but the product
one (and they are not defeq as `(fun p : E × F ↦ (p.1, p.2))` is not defeq to the identity).
So, it is important to use the above incantation to maximize the applicability of theorems.
## Implementation notes
We want to talk about manifolds modelled on a vector space, but also on manifolds with
boundary, modelled on a half space (or even manifolds with corners). For the latter examples,
we still want to define smooth functions, tangent bundles, and so on. As smooth functions are
well defined on vector spaces or subsets of these, one could take for model space a subtype of a
vector space. With the drawback that the whole vector space itself (which is the most basic
example) is not directly a subtype of itself: the inclusion of `univ : Set E` in `Set E` would
show up in the definition, instead of `id`.
A good abstraction covering both cases it to have a vector
space `E` (with basic example the Euclidean space), a model space `H` (with basic example the upper
half space), and an embedding of `H` into `E` (which can be the identity for `H = E`, or
`Subtype.val` for manifolds with corners). We say that the pair `(E, H)` with their embedding is a
model with corners, and we encompass all the relevant properties (in particular the fact that the
image of `H` in `E` should have unique differentials) in the definition of `ModelWithCorners`.
We concentrate on `C^∞` manifolds: all the definitions work equally well for `C^n` manifolds, but
later on it is a pain to carry all over the smoothness parameter, especially when one wants to deal
with `C^k` functions as there would be additional conditions `k ≤ n` everywhere. Since one deals
almost all the time with `C^∞` (or analytic) manifolds, this seems to be a reasonable choice that
one could revisit later if needed. `C^k` manifolds are still available, but they should be called
using `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid k I)` where `I` is the model with corners.
I have considered using the model with corners `I` as a typeclass argument, possibly `outParam`, to
get lighter notations later on, but it did not turn out right, as on `E × F` there are two natural
model with corners, the trivial (identity) one, and the product one, and they are not defeq and one
needs to indicate to Lean which one we want to use.
This means that when talking on objects on manifolds one will most often need to specify the model
with corners one is using. For instance, the tangent bundle will be `TangentBundle I M` and the
derivative will be `mfderiv I I' f`, instead of the more natural notations `TangentBundle 𝕜 M` and
`mfderiv 𝕜 f` (the field has to be explicit anyway, as some manifolds could be considered both as
real and complex manifolds).
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w u' v' w'
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Manifold Filter Topology
/-- The extended natural number `∞` -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ℕ∞)
/-! ### Models with corners. -/
/-- A structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space `E` over the field `𝕜`. This is all what is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
-/
@[ext] -- Porting note(#5171): was nolint has_nonempty_instance
structure ModelWithCorners (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] extends
PartialEquiv H E where
source_eq : source = univ
unique_diff' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 toPartialEquiv.target
continuous_toFun : Continuous toFun := by continuity
continuous_invFun : Continuous invFun := by continuity
#align model_with_corners ModelWithCorners
attribute [simp, mfld_simps] ModelWithCorners.source_eq
/-- A vector space is a model with corners. -/
def modelWithCornersSelf (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.refl E
source_eq := rfl
unique_diff' := uniqueDiffOn_univ
continuous_toFun := continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_id
#align model_with_corners_self modelWithCornersSelf
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ", " E ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E
/-- A normed field is a model with corners. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 𝕜
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
namespace ModelWithCorners
/-- Coercion of a model with corners to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is actually
`e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to
switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' (e : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) fun _ => H → E := ⟨toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse to a model with corners, only registered as a `PartialEquiv`. -/
protected def symm : PartialEquiv E H :=
I.toPartialEquiv.symm
#align model_with_corners.symm ModelWithCorners.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E :=
I
#align model_with_corners.simps.apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : E → H :=
I.symm
#align model_with_corners.simps.symm_apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections ModelWithCorners (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
-- Register a few lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts expressions in normal form
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe : (I.toPartialEquiv : H → E) = I :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
((ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E) = (e : H → E) :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_coe ModelWithCorners.mk_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe_symm : (I.toPartialEquiv.symm : E → H) = I.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe_symm ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_symm (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
(ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_symm ModelWithCorners.mk_symm
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous I :=
I.continuous_toFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous ModelWithCorners.continuous
protected theorem continuousAt {x} : ContinuousAt I x :=
I.continuous.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at ModelWithCorners.continuousAt
protected theorem continuousWithinAt {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I s x :=
I.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous I.symm :=
I.continuous_invFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous_symm ModelWithCorners.continuous_symm
theorem continuousAt_symm {x} : ContinuousAt I.symm x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousAt_symm
theorem continuousWithinAt_symm {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I.symm s x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_symm {s} : ContinuousOn I.symm s :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousOn
#align model_with_corners.continuous_on_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousOn_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem target_eq : I.target = range (I : H → E) := by
rw [← image_univ, ← I.source_eq]
exact I.image_source_eq_target.symm
#align model_with_corners.target_eq ModelWithCorners.target_eq
protected theorem unique_diff : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (range I) :=
I.target_eq ▸ I.unique_diff'
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff ModelWithCorners.unique_diff
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem left_inv (x : H) : I.symm (I x) = x := by refine I.left_inv' ?_; simp
#align model_with_corners.left_inv ModelWithCorners.left_inv
protected theorem leftInverse : LeftInverse I.symm I :=
I.left_inv
#align model_with_corners.left_inverse ModelWithCorners.leftInverse
theorem injective : Injective I :=
I.leftInverse.injective
#align model_with_corners.injective ModelWithCorners.injective
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_comp_self : I.symm ∘ I = id :=
I.leftInverse.comp_eq_id
#align model_with_corners.symm_comp_self ModelWithCorners.symm_comp_self
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn I.symm I (range I) :=
I.leftInverse.rightInvOn_range
#align model_with_corners.right_inv_on ModelWithCorners.rightInvOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem right_inv {x : E} (hx : x ∈ range I) : I (I.symm x) = x :=
I.rightInvOn hx
#align model_with_corners.right_inv ModelWithCorners.right_inv
theorem preimage_image (s : Set H) : I ⁻¹' (I '' s) = s :=
I.injective.preimage_image s
#align model_with_corners.preimage_image ModelWithCorners.preimage_image
protected theorem image_eq (s : Set H) : I '' s = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I := by
refine (I.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage ?_).trans ?_
· rw [I.source_eq]; exact subset_univ _
· rw [inter_comm, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm]
#align model_with_corners.image_eq ModelWithCorners.image_eq
protected theorem closedEmbedding : ClosedEmbedding I :=
I.leftInverse.closedEmbedding I.continuous_symm I.continuous
#align model_with_corners.closed_embedding ModelWithCorners.closedEmbedding
theorem isClosed_range : IsClosed (range I) :=
I.closedEmbedding.isClosed_range
#align model_with_corners.closed_range ModelWithCorners.isClosed_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-17")] alias closed_range := isClosed_range
theorem map_nhds_eq (x : H) : map I (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhds_eq x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq (s : Set H) (x : H) : map I (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[I '' s] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq s x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_within_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhdsWithin_eq
theorem image_mem_nhdsWithin {x : H} {s : Set H} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : I '' s ∈ 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.map_nhds_eq x ▸ image_mem_map hs
#align model_with_corners.image_mem_nhds_within ModelWithCorners.image_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_image {x : H} {s : Set H} : map I.symm (𝓝[I '' s] I x) = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [← I.map_nhdsWithin_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_image ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_range (x : H) : map I.symm (𝓝[range I] I x) = 𝓝 x := by
rw [← I.map_nhds_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_range ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range
theorem unique_diff_preimage {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact I.unique_diff.inter (hs.preimage I.continuous_invFun)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage
theorem unique_diff_preimage_source {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {e : PartialHomeomorph H β} :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' e.source ∩ range I) :=
I.unique_diff_preimage e.open_source
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage_source ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage_source
theorem unique_diff_at_image {x : H} : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (range I) (I x) :=
I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_at_image ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_at_image
theorem symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : H → X} {s : Set H}
{x : H} :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.comp I.continuousWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
simp_rw [preimage_inter, preimage_preimage, I.left_inv, preimage_id', preimage_range,
inter_univ] at this
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, I.symm_comp_self] at this
· rw [← I.left_inv x] at h; exact h.comp I.continuousWithinAt_symm inter_subset_left
#align model_with_corners.symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff ModelWithCorners.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
protected theorem locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
LocallyCompactSpace H := by
have : ∀ x : H, (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ 𝓝 (I x) ∧ IsCompact s)
fun s => I.symm '' (s ∩ range I) := fun x ↦ by
rw [← I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (I x)).inf_principal _).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨-, hsc⟩
exact (hsc.inter_right I.isClosed_range).image I.continuous_symm
#align model_with_corners.locally_compact ModelWithCorners.locallyCompactSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem secondCountableTopology [SecondCountableTopology E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
SecondCountableTopology H :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.secondCountableTopology
#align model_with_corners.second_countable_topology ModelWithCorners.secondCountableTopology
end ModelWithCorners
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- In the trivial model with corners, the associated `PartialEquiv` is the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv : 𝓘(𝕜, E).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.refl E :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_local_equiv modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe : (𝓘(𝕜, E) : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe modelWithCornersSelf_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm : (𝓘(𝕜, E).symm : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe_symm modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm
end
end
section ModelWithCornersProd
/-- Given two model_with_corners `I` on `(E, H)` and `I'` on `(E', H')`, we define the model with
corners `I.prod I'` on `(E × E', ModelProd H H')`. This appears in particular for the manifold
structure on the tangent bundle to a manifold modelled on `(E, H)`: it will be modelled on
`(E × E, H × E)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about `ModelProd H H'`
vs `H × H'`. -/
@[simps (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def ModelWithCorners.prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E') (ModelProd H H') :=
{ I.toPartialEquiv.prod I'.toPartialEquiv with
toFun := fun x => (I x.1, I' x.2)
invFun := fun x => (I.symm x.1, I'.symm x.2)
source := { x | x.1 ∈ I.source ∧ x.2 ∈ I'.source }
source_eq := by simp only [setOf_true, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := I.unique_diff'.prod I'.unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := I.continuous_toFun.prod_map I'.continuous_toFun
continuous_invFun := I.continuous_invFun.prod_map I'.continuous_invFun }
#align model_with_corners.prod ModelWithCorners.prod
/-- Given a finite family of `ModelWithCorners` `I i` on `(E i, H i)`, we define the model with
corners `pi I` on `(Π i, E i, ModelPi H)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about
`ModelPi H`. -/
def ModelWithCorners.pi {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι]
{E : ι → Type w} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] {H : ι → Type u'}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)] (I : ∀ i, ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E i) (H i)) :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (∀ i, E i) (ModelPi H) where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.pi fun i => (I i).toPartialEquiv
source_eq := by simp only [pi_univ, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := UniqueDiffOn.pi ι E _ _ fun i _ => (I i).unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous.comp (continuous_apply i)
continuous_invFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous_symm.comp (continuous_apply i)
#align model_with_corners.pi ModelWithCorners.pi
/-- Special case of product model with corners, which is trivial on the second factor. This shows up
as the model to tangent bundles. -/
abbrev ModelWithCorners.tangent {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E) (ModelProd H E) :=
I.prod 𝓘(𝕜, E)
#align model_with_corners.tangent ModelWithCorners.tangent
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F']
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H}
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv :
(I.prod J).toPartialEquiv = I.toPartialEquiv.prod J.toPartialEquiv :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_to_local_equiv modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
(I.prod I' : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I I' :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe modelWithCorners_prod_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
((I.prod I').symm : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I.symm I'.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe_symm modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_prod : 𝓘(𝕜, E × F) = 𝓘(𝕜, E).prod 𝓘(𝕜, F) := by ext1 <;> simp
#align model_with_corners_self_prod modelWithCornersSelf_prod
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_prod : range (I.prod J) = range I ×ˢ range J := by
simp_rw [← ModelWithCorners.target_eq]; rfl
#align model_with_corners.range_prod ModelWithCorners.range_prod
end ModelWithCornersProd
section Boundaryless
/-- Property ensuring that the model with corners `I` defines manifolds without boundary. This
differs from the more general `BoundarylessManifold`, which requires every point on the manifold
to be an interior point. -/
class ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : Prop where
range_eq_univ : range I = univ
#align model_with_corners.boundaryless ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] :
range I = univ := ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ
/-- If `I` is a `ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless` model, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
@[simps (config := {simpRhs := true})]
def ModelWithCorners.toHomeomorph {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] : H ≃ₜ E where
__ := I
left_inv := I.left_inv
right_inv _ := I.right_inv <| I.range_eq_univ.symm ▸ mem_univ _
/-- The trivial model with corners has no boundary -/
instance modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : (modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E).Boundaryless :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align model_with_corners_self_boundaryless modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless
/-- If two model with corners are boundaryless, their product also is -/
instance ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H')
[I'.Boundaryless] : (I.prod I').Boundaryless := by
constructor
dsimp [ModelWithCorners.prod, ModelProd]
rw [← prod_range_range_eq, ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ,
ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ, univ_prod_univ]
#align model_with_corners.range_eq_univ_prod ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod
end Boundaryless
section contDiffGroupoid
/-! ### Smooth functions on models with corners -/
variable {m n : ℕ∞} {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
variable (n)
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the pregroupoid of `C^n` transformations of `H`
as the maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffPregroupoid : Pregroupoid H where
property f s := ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
comp {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ := by
have : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
simp only [this]
refine hg.comp (hf.mono fun x ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ ↦ ⟨hx1.1, hx2⟩) ?_
rintro x ⟨hx1, _⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx1 ⊢
exact hx1.2
id_mem := by
apply ContDiffOn.congr contDiff_id.contDiffOn
rintro x ⟨_, hx2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hx2 with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy]
simp only [mfld_simps]
locality {f u} _ H := by
apply contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rcases H x hy1 with ⟨v, v_open, xv, hv⟩
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' u ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' v := by
rw [preimage_inter, inter_assoc, inter_assoc]
congr 1
rw [inter_comm]
rw [this] at hv
exact ⟨I.symm ⁻¹' v, v_open.preimage I.continuous_symm, by simpa, hv⟩
congr {f g u} _ fg hf := by
apply hf.congr
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rw [fg _ hy1]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of invertible `C^n` transformations
of `H` as the invertible maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (contDiffPregroupoid n I)
#align cont_diff_groupoid contDiffGroupoid
variable {n}
/-- Inclusion of the groupoid of `C^n` local diffeos in the groupoid of `C^m` local diffeos when
`m ≤ n` -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_le (h : m ≤ n) : contDiffGroupoid n I ≤ contDiffGroupoid m I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, contDiffGroupoid]
apply groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le
intro f s hfs
exact ContDiffOn.of_le hfs h
#align cont_diff_groupoid_le contDiffGroupoid_le
/-- The groupoid of `0`-times continuously differentiable maps is just the groupoid of all
partial homeomorphisms -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq : contDiffGroupoid 0 I = continuousGroupoid H := by
apply le_antisymm le_top
intro u _
-- we have to check that every partial homeomorphism belongs to `contDiffGroupoid 0 I`,
-- by unfolding its definition
change u ∈ contDiffGroupoid 0 I
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid, contDiffPregroupoid]
simp only [contDiffOn_zero]
constructor
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.symm.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
#align cont_diff_groupoid_zero_eq contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq
variable (n)
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid]
suffices h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) by
simp [h, contDiffPregroupoid]
have : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n id (univ : Set E) := contDiff_id.contDiffOn
exact this.congr_mono (fun x hx => I.right_inv hx.2) (subset_univ _)
#align of_set_mem_cont_diff_groupoid ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I e.open_target) this
#align symm_trans_mem_cont_diff_groupoid symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid
variable {E' H' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
/-- The product of two smooth partial homeomorphisms is smooth. -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_prod {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'} (he : e ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I)
(he' : e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I') : e.prod e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ (I.prod I') := by
cases' he with he he_symm
cases' he' with he' he'_symm
simp only at he he_symm he' he'_symm
constructor <;> simp only [PartialEquiv.prod_source, PartialHomeomorph.prod_toPartialEquiv,
contDiffPregroupoid]
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he he'
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he_symm he'_symm
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
#align cont_diff_groupoid_prod contDiffGroupoid_prod
/-- The `C^n` groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (contDiffGroupoid n I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (contDiffGroupoid n I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I hs)
end contDiffGroupoid
section analyticGroupoid
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of analytic transformations of `H`
as the maps that are analytic and map interior to interior when read in `E` through `I`. We also
explicitly define that they are `C^∞` on the whole domain, since we are only requiring
analyticity on the interior of the domain. -/
def analyticGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) ⊓ Pregroupoid.groupoid
{ property := fun f s => AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I)
comp := fun {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ => by
simp only [] at hf hg ⊢
have comp : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
apply And.intro
· simp only [comp, preimage_inter]
refine hg.left.comp (hf.left.mono ?_) ?_
· simp only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_right]
rw [inter_assoc]
simp
· intro x hx
apply And.intro
· rw [mem_preimage, comp_apply, I.left_inv]
exact hx.left.right
· apply hf.right
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨x, ⟨⟨hx.left.left, hx.right⟩, rfl⟩⟩
· simp only [comp]
rw [image_comp]
intro x hx
rw [mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x', hx'⟩
refine hg.right ⟨x', And.intro ?_ hx'.right⟩
apply And.intro
· have hx'1 : x' ∈ ((v.preimage f).preimage (I.symm)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) := by
refine image_subset (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ?_ hx'.left
rw [preimage_inter]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (u.preimage I.symm).inter_subset_right
apply inter_subset_left
rcases hx'1 with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
rw [hx''.right.symm]
simp only [comp_apply, mem_preimage, I.left_inv]
exact hx''.left
· rw [mem_image] at hx'
rcases hx'.left with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
exact hf.right ⟨x'', ⟨⟨hx''.left.left.left, hx''.left.right⟩, hx''.right⟩⟩
id_mem := by
apply And.intro
· simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact AnalyticOn.congr isOpen_interior
(f := (1 : E →L[𝕜] E)) (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
(fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz)).symm)
· intro x hx
simp only [id_comp, comp_apply, preimage_univ, univ_inter, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left)]
exact hy.left
locality := fun {f u} _ h => by
simp only [] at h
simp only [AnalyticOn]
apply And.intro
· intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) (mem_preimage.mp hx.left) with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact hv.right.right.left x ⟨mem_preimage.mpr ⟨hx.left, hv.right.left⟩, hx.right⟩
· apply mapsTo'.mp
simp only [MapsTo]
intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) hx.left with ⟨v, hv⟩
apply hv.right.right.right
rw [mem_image]
have hx' := And.intro hx (mem_preimage.mpr hv.right.left)
rw [← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, ← preimage_inter, inter_comm v u] at hx'
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx', rfl⟩⟩
congr := fun {f g u} hu fg hf => by
simp only [] at hf ⊢
apply And.intro
· refine AnalyticOn.congr (IsOpen.inter (hu.preimage I.continuous_symm) isOpen_interior)
hf.left ?_
intro z hz
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [fg (I.symm z) hz.left]
· intro x hx
apply hf.right
rw [mem_image] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy.left, ?_⟩⟩
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, fg (I.symm y) hy.left.left] at hy
exact hy.right }
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ analyticGroupoid I := by
rw [analyticGroupoid]
refine And.intro (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid ∞ I hs) ?_
apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr
suffices h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I) by
simp only [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_apply, id_comp, PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_toPartialEquiv,
PartialEquiv.ofSet_source, h, comp_apply, mem_range, image_subset_iff, true_and,
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_symm, PartialEquiv.ofSet_target, and_self]
intro x hx
refine mem_preimage.mpr ?_
rw [← I.right_inv (interior_subset hx.right)] at hx
exact hx.right
apply And.intro
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (1 : E →L[𝕜] E) (univ : Set E) := (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
exact (this.mono (subset_univ (s.preimage (I.symm) ∩ interior (range I)))).congr
((hs.preimage I.continuous_symm).inter isOpen_interior)
fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz.right)).symm
· intro x hx
simp only [comp_apply, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left.right)]
exact hy.left.right
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_analyticGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ analyticGroupoid I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I e.open_target) this
/-- The analytic groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (analyticGroupoid I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (analyticGroupoid I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I hs)
/-- The analytic groupoid on a boundaryless charted space modeled on a complete vector space
consists of the partial homeomorphisms which are analytic and have analytic inverse. -/
theorem mem_analyticGroupoid_of_boundaryless [CompleteSpace E] [I.Boundaryless]
(e : PartialHomeomorph H H) :
e ∈ analyticGroupoid I ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.source) ∧
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.target) := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro he
have := mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mp he.right
simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ, interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true] at this ⊢
exact this
· intro he
apply And.intro
all_goals apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr; simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ,
interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true, contDiffPregroupoid] at he ⊢
· exact ⟨he.left.contDiffOn, he.right.contDiffOn⟩
· exact he
end analyticGroupoid
section SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/-! ### Smooth manifolds with corners -/
/-- Typeclass defining smooth manifolds with corners with respect to a model with corners, over a
field `𝕜` and with infinite smoothness to simplify typeclass search and statements later on. -/
class SmoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] extends
HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) : Prop
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[gr : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M :=
{ gr with }
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.mk' SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk'
theorem smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
(h : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M →
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (I ∘ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source ∩ range I)) :
SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M where
compatible := by
haveI : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) := hasGroupoid_of_pregroupoid _ (h _ _)
apply StructureGroupoid.compatible
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners_of_cont_diff_on smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn
/-- For any model with corners, the model space is a smooth manifold -/
instance model_space_smooth {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I H :=
{ hasGroupoid_model_space _ _ with }
#align model_space_smooth model_space_smooth
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/- We restate in the namespace `SmoothManifoldWithCorners` some lemmas that hold for general
charted space with a structure groupoid, avoiding the need to specify the groupoid
`contDiffGroupoid ∞ I` explicitly. -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
/-- The maximal atlas of `M` for the smooth manifold with corners structure corresponding to the
model with corners `I`. -/
def maximalAtlas :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I).maximalAtlas M
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.maximalAtlas
variable {M}
theorem subset_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] : atlas H M ⊆ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.subset_maximalAtlas _
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.subset_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.subset_maximalAtlas
theorem chart_mem_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (x : M) :
chartAt H x ∈ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.chart_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.chart_mem_maximalAtlas
variable {I}
theorem compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) : e.symm.trans e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ∞ I :=
StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he'
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas
/-- The product of two smooth manifolds with corners is naturally a smooth manifold with corners. -/
instance prod {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (M' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M'] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners (I.prod I') (M × M') where
compatible := by
rintro f g ⟨f1, hf1, f2, hf2, rfl⟩ ⟨g1, hg1, g2, hg2, rfl⟩
rw [PartialHomeomorph.prod_symm, PartialHomeomorph.prod_trans]
have h1 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I).compatible hf1 hg1
have h2 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I').compatible hf2 hg2
exact contDiffGroupoid_prod h1 h2
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.prod SmoothManifoldWithCorners.prod
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) (h : e.source = Set.univ) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ (e.singletonChartedSpace h) :=
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (id _) <|
e.singleton_hasGroupoid h (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)
#align local_homeomorph.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [Nonempty M] {f : M → H}
(h : OpenEmbedding f) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ h.singletonChartedSpace :=
(h.toPartialHomeomorph f).singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners I (by simp)
#align open_embedding.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
open TopologicalSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (s : Opens M)
instance : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I s :=
{ s.instHasGroupoid (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) with }
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
section ExtendedCharts
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 E M H E' M' H' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] (f f' : PartialHomeomorph M H)
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
[TopologicalSpace M'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {s t : Set M}
/-!
### Extended charts
In a smooth manifold with corners, the model space is the space `H`. However, we will also
need to use extended charts taking values in the model vector space `E`. These extended charts are
not `PartialHomeomorph` as the target is not open in `E` in general, but we can still register them
as `PartialEquiv`.
-/
namespace PartialHomeomorph
/-- Given a chart `f` on a manifold with corners, `f.extend I` is the extended chart to the model
vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extend : PartialEquiv M E :=
f.toPartialEquiv ≫ I.toPartialEquiv
#align local_homeomorph.extend PartialHomeomorph.extend
theorem extend_coe : ⇑(f.extend I) = I ∘ f :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe
theorem extend_coe_symm : ⇑(f.extend I).symm = f.symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe_symm PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe_symm
theorem extend_source : (f.extend I).source = f.source := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.source_eq, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_source
theorem isOpen_extend_source : IsOpen (f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_source]
exact f.open_source
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_source PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_source
theorem extend_target : (f.extend I).target = I.symm ⁻¹' f.target ∩ range I := by
simp_rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm, inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target PartialHomeomorph.extend_target
theorem extend_target' : (f.extend I).target = I '' f.target := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target'', I.source_eq, univ_inter, I.toPartialEquiv_coe]
lemma isOpen_extend_target [I.Boundaryless] : IsOpen (f.extend I).target := by
rw [extend_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact I.continuous_symm.isOpen_preimage _ f.open_target
theorem mapsTo_extend (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
MapsTo (f.extend I) s ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [mapsTo', extend_coe, extend_coe_symm, preimage_comp, ← I.image_eq, image_comp,
f.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hs]
exact image_subset _ inter_subset_right
#align local_homeomorph.maps_to_extend PartialHomeomorph.mapsTo_extend
theorem extend_left_inv {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) = x :=
(f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_left_inv PartialHomeomorph.extend_left_inv
/-- Variant of `f.extend_left_inv I`, stated in terms of images. -/
lemma extend_left_inv' (ht: t ⊆ f.source) : ((f.extend I).symm ∘ (f.extend I)) '' t = t :=
EqOn.image_eq_self (fun _ hx ↦ f.extend_left_inv I (ht hx))
theorem extend_source_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(isOpen_extend_source f I).mem_nhds <| by rwa [f.extend_source I]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds
theorem extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extend : ContinuousOn (f.extend I) (f.extend I).source := by
refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn ?_
rw [extend_source]
exact f.continuousOn
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend
theorem continuousAt_extend {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : ContinuousAt (f.extend I) x :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).continuousAt <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend
theorem map_extend_nhds {x : M} (hy : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [extend_coe, comp_apply, ← I.map_nhds_eq, ← f.map_nhds_eq, map_map]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhds
theorem map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
rw [f.map_extend_nhds _ hx, I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
(f.extend I).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [← PartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target, ← map_extend_nhds f I hy]
exact image_mem_map (extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x} (hx : x ∈ f.source)
{s : Set M} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : (f.extend I) '' s ∈ 𝓝 ((f.extend I) x) := by
rw [← f.map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless _ hx, Filter.mem_map]
filter_upwards [h] using subset_preimage_image (f.extend I) s
theorem extend_target_subset_range : (f.extend I).target ⊆ range I := by simp only [mfld_simps]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_subset_range PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_subset_range
lemma interior_extend_target_subset_interior_range :
interior (f.extend I).target ⊆ interior (range I) := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq]
exact inter_subset_right
/-- If `y ∈ f.target` and `I y ∈ interior (range I)`,
then `I y` is an interior point of `(I ∘ f).target`. -/
lemma mem_interior_extend_target {y : H} (hy : y ∈ f.target)
(hy' : I y ∈ interior (range I)) : I y ∈ interior (f.extend I).target := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq,
mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨mem_of_eq_of_mem (I.left_inv (y)) hy, hy'⟩
theorem nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
𝓝[(f.extend I).target] f.extend I y = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y :=
(nhdsWithin_mono _ (extend_target_subset_range _ _)).antisymm <|
nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.nhds_within_extend_target_eq PartialHomeomorph.nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm' {x : E} (h : x ∈ (f.extend I).target) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm x :=
(f.continuousAt_symm h.2).comp I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm' PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' f I <| (f.extend I).map_source <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm
theorem continuousOn_extend_symm : ContinuousOn (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I).target := fun _ h =>
(continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend_symm
theorem extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {g : M → X}
{s : Set M} {x : M} :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I x) ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f.symm) (f.symm ⁻¹' s) (f x) := by
rw [← I.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff]; rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage' {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((f.extend I).source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).isOpen_inter_preimage (isOpen_extend_source _ _) hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage' PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (f.source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extend_source f I]; exact isOpen_extend_preimage' f I hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' ((f.extend I).source ∩ s)] f.extend I y := by
set e := f.extend I
calc
map e (𝓝[s] y) = map e (𝓝[e.source ∩ s] y) :=
congr_arg (map e) (nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin f I hy)).symm
_ = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e y :=
((f.extend I).leftInvOn.mono inter_subset_left).map_nhdsWithin_eq
((f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source])
(continuousAt_extend_symm f I hy).continuousWithinAt
(continuousAt_extend f I hy).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within_eq_image PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' s] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ hy, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
rwa [extend_source]
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image f I hy, nhdsWithin_inter, ←
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ hy, ← nhdsWithin_inter, (f.extend I).image_source_inter_eq',
inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝[s] y := by
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin f I hy, map_map, Filter.map_congr, map_id]
exact (f.extend I).leftInvOn.eqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝 y := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ, ← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I hy, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within_range PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range
theorem tendsto_extend_comp_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {g : α → M}
(hg : ∀ᶠ z in l, g z ∈ f.source) {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
Tendsto (f.extend I ∘ g) l (𝓝 (f.extend I y)) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 y) := by
refine ⟨fun h u hu ↦ mem_map.2 ?_, (continuousAt_extend _ _ hy).tendsto.comp⟩
have := (f.continuousAt_extend_symm I hy).tendsto.comp h
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy] at this
filter_upwards [hg, mem_map.1 (this hu)] with z hz hzu
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), extend_left_inv _ _ hz, mem_preimage] using hzu
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
theorem continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'} {y : M}
(hy : y ∈ f.source) (hgy : g y ∈ f'.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousWithinAt (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm)
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I y) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s y := by
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy, f'.tendsto_extend_comp_iff _ _ hgy,
← f.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin I hy, tendsto_map'_iff]
rw [← f.map_extend_nhdsWithin I hy, eventually_map]
filter_upwards [inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (f.open_source.mem_nhds hy)] with z hz
rw [comp_apply, extend_left_inv _ _ hz.2]
exact hmaps hz.1
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
/-- If `s ⊆ f.source` and `g x ∈ f'.source` whenever `x ∈ s`, then `g` is continuous on `s` if and
only if `g` written in charts `f.extend I` and `f'.extend I'` is continuous on `f.extend I '' s`. -/
theorem continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'}
(hs : s ⊆ f.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousOn (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) (f.extend I '' s) ↔ ContinuousOn g s := by
refine forall_mem_image.trans <| forall₂_congr fun x hx ↦ ?_
refine (continuousWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_).trans
(continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff _ _ _ (hs hx) (hmaps hx) hmaps)
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin]
exacts [hs hx, hs hx, hs]
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I h, mem_map] at ht
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
apply (continuousAt_extend_symm f I h).preimage_mem_nhds
rwa [(f.extend I).left_inv]
rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds
/-- Technical lemma to rewrite suitably the preimage of an intersection under an extended chart, to
bring it into a convenient form to apply derivative lemmas. -/
theorem extend_preimage_inter_eq :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) ∩ range I =
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t := by
mfld_set_tac
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq
-- Porting note: an `aux` lemma that is no longer needed. Delete?
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux {s : Set M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)]
((f.extend I).target ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s : Set _) := by
rw [f.extend_target, inter_assoc, inter_comm (range I)]
conv =>
congr
· skip
rw [← univ_inter (_ ∩ range I)]
refine (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr ?_).symm.inter EventuallyEq.rfl
refine I.continuousAt_symm.preimage_mem_nhds (f.open_target.mem_nhds ?_)
simp_rw [f.extend_coe, Function.comp_apply, I.left_inv, f.mapsTo hx]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq_aux PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq {s : Set M} {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ f.source)
(hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)] f.extend I '' s := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ hx,
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset _ _ hx hs]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq
/-! We use the name `extend_coord_change` for `(f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I`. -/
theorem extend_coord_change_source :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source = I '' (f.symm ≫ₕ f').source := by
simp_rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.image_eq, extend_source, PartialEquiv.symm_source,
extend_target, inter_right_comm _ (range I)]
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source
theorem extend_image_source_inter :
f.extend I '' (f.source ∩ f'.source) = ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source := by
simp_rw [f.extend_coord_change_source, f.extend_coe, image_comp I f, trans_source'', symm_symm,
symm_target]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_image_source_inter PartialHomeomorph.extend_image_source_inter
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] x := by
rw [f.extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := hx
refine I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hx
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source)
(hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
apply extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf, hxf'⟩
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within' PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
variable {f f'}
open SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem contDiffOn_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_coord_change_source, I.image_eq]
exact (StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas hf' hf).1
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_on_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffOn_extend_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) x := by
apply (contDiffOn_extend_coord_change I hf hf' x hx).mono_of_mem
rw [extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ := hx
exact I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hz)
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_within_at_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change' [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) (hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) (f'.extend I x) := by
refine contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change I hf hf' ?_
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf', hxf⟩
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_within_at_extend_coord_change' PartialHomeomorph.contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change'
end PartialHomeomorph
open PartialHomeomorph
variable [ChartedSpace H M] [ChartedSpace H' M']
/-- The preferred extended chart on a manifold with corners around a point `x`, from a neighborhood
of `x` to the model vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extChartAt (x : M) : PartialEquiv M E :=
(chartAt H x).extend I
#align ext_chart_at extChartAt
theorem extChartAt_coe (x : M) : ⇑(extChartAt I x) = I ∘ chartAt H x :=
rfl
#align ext_chart_at_coe extChartAt_coe
theorem extChartAt_coe_symm (x : M) : ⇑(extChartAt I x).symm = (chartAt H x).symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align ext_chart_at_coe_symm extChartAt_coe_symm
theorem extChartAt_source (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source = (chartAt H x).source :=
extend_source _ _
#align ext_chart_at_source extChartAt_source
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_source (x : M) : IsOpen (extChartAt I x).source :=
isOpen_extend_source _ _
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_source isOpen_extChartAt_source
theorem mem_extChartAt_source (x : M) : x ∈ (extChartAt I x).source := by
simp only [extChartAt_source, mem_chart_source]
#align mem_ext_chart_source mem_extChartAt_source
theorem mem_extChartAt_target (x : M) : extChartAt I x x ∈ (extChartAt I x).target :=
(extChartAt I x).map_source <| mem_extChartAt_source _ _
theorem extChartAt_target (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target = I.symm ⁻¹' (chartAt H x).target ∩ range I :=
extend_target _ _
#align ext_chart_at_target extChartAt_target
theorem uniqueDiffOn_extChartAt_target (x : M) : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I x).target := by
rw [extChartAt_target]
exact I.unique_diff_preimage (chartAt H x).open_target
theorem uniqueDiffWithinAt_extChartAt_target (x : M) :
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I x).target (extChartAt I x x) :=
uniqueDiffOn_extChartAt_target I x _ <| mem_extChartAt_target I x
theorem extChartAt_to_inv (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).symm ((extChartAt I x) x) = x :=
(extChartAt I x).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_to_inv extChartAt_to_inv
theorem mapsTo_extChartAt {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source) :
MapsTo (extChartAt I x) s ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) :=
mapsTo_extend _ _ hs
#align maps_to_ext_chart_at mapsTo_extChartAt
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝 x' :=
extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds' extChartAt_source_mem_nhds'
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds extChartAt_source_mem_nhds
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x' :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' I h)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds I x)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extChartAt (x : M) : ContinuousOn (extChartAt I x) (extChartAt I x).source :=
continuousOn_extend _ _
#align continuous_on_ext_chart_at continuousOn_extChartAt
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x) x' :=
continuousAt_extend _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at' continuousAt_extChartAt'
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt (x : M) : ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x) x :=
continuousAt_extChartAt' _ (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at continuousAt_extChartAt
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhds _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds' map_extChartAt_nhds'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds (x : M) : map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhds' I <| mem_extChartAt_source I x
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds map_extChartAt_nhds
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [extChartAt]
exact map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless (chartAt H x) I (mem_chart_source H x)
variable {x} in
theorem extChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless]
{x : M} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : extChartAt I x '' s ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [extChartAt]
exact extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless _ I (mem_chart_source H x) hx
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin'
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x :=
extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin
/-- If we're boundaryless, `extChartAt` has open target -/
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_target [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) : IsOpen (extChartAt I x).target := by
simp_rw [extChartAt_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_target _).preimage I.continuous_symm
/-- If we're boundaryless, `(extChartAt I x).target` is a neighborhood of the key point -/
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhds [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
convert extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin I x
simp only [I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- If we're boundaryless, `(extChartAt I x).target` is a neighborhood of any of its points -/
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhds' [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} {y : E}
(m : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) : (extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝 y :=
(isOpen_extChartAt_target I x).mem_nhds m
theorem extChartAt_target_subset_range (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).target ⊆ range I := by
simp only [mfld_simps]
#align ext_chart_at_target_subset_range extChartAt_target_subset_range
theorem nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target] extChartAt I x y = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align nhds_within_ext_chart_at_target_eq' nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq (x : M) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target] (extChartAt I x) x = 𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align nhds_within_ext_chart_at_target_eq nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' {x : M} {y : E} (h : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm y :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm'' continuousAt_extChartAt_symm''
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm (extChartAt I x x') :=
continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' I <| (extChartAt I x).map_source h
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm' continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm (x : M) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm ((extChartAt I x) x) :=
continuousAt_extChartAt_symm' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm continuousAt_extChartAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_extChartAt_symm (x : M) :
ContinuousOn (extChartAt I x).symm (extChartAt I x).target :=
fun _y hy => (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' _ hy).continuousWithinAt
#align continuous_on_ext_chart_at_symm continuousOn_extChartAt_symm
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_preimage' (x : M) {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ extChartAt I x ⁻¹' s) :=
isOpen_extend_preimage' _ _ hs
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_preimage' isOpen_extChartAt_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_preimage (x : M) {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((chartAt H x).source ∩ extChartAt I x ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extChartAt_source I]
exact isOpen_extChartAt_preimage' I x hs
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_preimage isOpen_extChartAt_preimage
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] y) =
𝓝[extChartAt I x '' ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ s)] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within_eq_image' map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] x) =
𝓝[extChartAt I x '' ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ s)] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within_eq_image map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within' map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x y) =
𝓝[s] y :=
map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within' map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin'
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y) = 𝓝 y :=
map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within_range' map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range'
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x x) =
𝓝[s] x :=
map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x) = 𝓝 x :=
map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within_range map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x' := by
rwa [← map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' I h, mem_map] at ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of the
base point is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x) ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x') : (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x') :=
extend_preimage_mem_nhds _ _ (by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]) ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds' extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds'
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
is a neighborhood of the preimage. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds {x : M} (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm I x).preimage_mem_nhds
rwa [(extChartAt I x).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source _ _)]
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds
/-- Technical lemma to rewrite suitably the preimage of an intersection under an extended chart, to
bring it into a convenient form to apply derivative lemmas. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) ∩ range I =
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t := by
mfld_set_tac
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_inter_eq extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range
{f : M → M'} {x : M} (hc : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x x) =
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source)] (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [← (extChartAt I x).image_source_inter_eq', ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image,
← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem']
exact hc (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds _ _)
/-! We use the name `ext_coord_change` for `(extChartAt I x').symm ≫ extChartAt I x`. -/
theorem ext_coord_change_source (x x' : M) :
((extChartAt I x').symm ≫ extChartAt I x).source =
I '' ((chartAt H x').symm ≫ₕ chartAt H x).source :=
extend_coord_change_source _ _ _
#align ext_coord_change_source ext_coord_change_source
open SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem contDiffOn_ext_coord_change [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (x x' : M) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (extChartAt I x ∘ (extChartAt I x').symm)
((extChartAt I x').symm ≫ extChartAt I x).source :=
contDiffOn_extend_coord_change I (chart_mem_maximalAtlas I x) (chart_mem_maximalAtlas I x')
#align cont_diff_on_ext_coord_change contDiffOn_ext_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_ext_coord_change [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (x x' : M) {y : E}
(hy : y ∈ ((extChartAt I x').symm ≫ extChartAt I x).source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (extChartAt I x ∘ (extChartAt I x').symm) (range I) y :=
contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change I (chart_mem_maximalAtlas I x) (chart_mem_maximalAtlas I x')
hy
#align cont_diff_within_at_ext_coord_change contDiffWithinAt_ext_coord_change
/-- Conjugating a function to write it in the preferred charts around `x`.
The manifold derivative of `f` will just be the derivative of this conjugated function. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def writtenInExtChartAt (x : M) (f : M → M') : E → E' :=
extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm
#align written_in_ext_chart_at writtenInExtChartAt
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/SmoothManifoldWithCorners.lean | 1,573 | 1,574 | theorem writtenInExtChartAt_chartAt {x : M} {y : E} (h : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) :
writtenInExtChartAt I I x (chartAt H x) y = y := by | simp_all only [mfld_simps]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
#align_import algebra.algebra.spectrum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"58a272265b5e05f258161260dd2c5d247213cbd3"
/-!
# Spectrum of an element in an algebra
This file develops the basic theory of the spectrum of an element of an algebra.
This theory will serve as the foundation for spectral theory in Banach algebras.
## Main definitions
* `resolventSet a : Set R`: the resolvent set of an element `a : A` where
`A` is an `R`-algebra.
* `spectrum a : Set R`: the spectrum of an element `a : A` where
`A` is an `R`-algebra.
* `resolvent : R → A`: the resolvent function is `fun r ↦ Ring.inverse (↑ₐr - a)`, and hence
when `r ∈ resolvent R A`, it is actually the inverse of the unit `(↑ₐr - a)`.
## Main statements
* `spectrum.unit_smul_eq_smul` and `spectrum.smul_eq_smul`: units in the scalar ring commute
(multiplication) with the spectrum, and over a field even `0` commutes with the spectrum.
* `spectrum.left_add_coset_eq`: elements of the scalar ring commute (addition) with the spectrum.
* `spectrum.unit_mem_mul_iff_mem_swap_mul` and `spectrum.preimage_units_mul_eq_swap_mul`: the
units (of `R`) in `σ (a*b)` coincide with those in `σ (b*a)`.
* `spectrum.scalar_eq`: in a nontrivial algebra over a field, the spectrum of a scalar is
a singleton.
## Notations
* `σ a` : `spectrum R a` of `a : A`
-/
open Set
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v
section Defs
variable (R : Type u) {A : Type v}
variable [CommSemiring R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
local notation "↑ₐ" => algebraMap R A
-- definition and basic properties
/-- Given a commutative ring `R` and an `R`-algebra `A`, the *resolvent set* of `a : A`
is the `Set R` consisting of those `r : R` for which `r•1 - a` is a unit of the
algebra `A`. -/
def resolventSet (a : A) : Set R :=
{r : R | IsUnit (↑ₐ r - a)}
#align resolvent_set resolventSet
/-- Given a commutative ring `R` and an `R`-algebra `A`, the *spectrum* of `a : A`
is the `Set R` consisting of those `r : R` for which `r•1 - a` is not a unit of the
algebra `A`.
The spectrum is simply the complement of the resolvent set. -/
def spectrum (a : A) : Set R :=
(resolventSet R a)ᶜ
#align spectrum spectrum
variable {R}
/-- Given an `a : A` where `A` is an `R`-algebra, the *resolvent* is
a map `R → A` which sends `r : R` to `(algebraMap R A r - a)⁻¹` when
`r ∈ resolvent R A` and `0` when `r ∈ spectrum R A`. -/
noncomputable def resolvent (a : A) (r : R) : A :=
Ring.inverse (↑ₐ r - a)
#align resolvent resolvent
/-- The unit `1 - r⁻¹ • a` constructed from `r • 1 - a` when the latter is a unit. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def IsUnit.subInvSMul {r : Rˣ} {s : R} {a : A} (h : IsUnit <| r • ↑ₐ s - a) : Aˣ where
val := ↑ₐ s - r⁻¹ • a
inv := r • ↑h.unit⁻¹
val_inv := by rw [mul_smul_comm, ← smul_mul_assoc, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul, h.mul_val_inv]
inv_val := by rw [smul_mul_assoc, ← mul_smul_comm, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul, h.val_inv_mul]
#align is_unit.sub_inv_smul IsUnit.subInvSMul
#align is_unit.coe_sub_inv_smul IsUnit.val_subInvSMul
#align is_unit.coe_inv_sub_inv_smul IsUnit.val_inv_subInvSMul
end Defs
namespace spectrum
section ScalarSemiring
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v}
variable [CommSemiring R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
local notation "σ" => spectrum R
local notation "↑ₐ" => algebraMap R A
theorem mem_iff {r : R} {a : A} : r ∈ σ a ↔ ¬IsUnit (↑ₐ r - a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align spectrum.mem_iff spectrum.mem_iff
theorem not_mem_iff {r : R} {a : A} : r ∉ σ a ↔ IsUnit (↑ₐ r - a) := by
apply not_iff_not.mp
simp [Set.not_not_mem, mem_iff]
#align spectrum.not_mem_iff spectrum.not_mem_iff
variable (R)
theorem zero_mem_iff {a : A} : (0 : R) ∈ σ a ↔ ¬IsUnit a := by
rw [mem_iff, map_zero, zero_sub, IsUnit.neg_iff]
#align spectrum.zero_mem_iff spectrum.zero_mem_iff
alias ⟨not_isUnit_of_zero_mem, zero_mem⟩ := spectrum.zero_mem_iff
theorem zero_not_mem_iff {a : A} : (0 : R) ∉ σ a ↔ IsUnit a := by
rw [zero_mem_iff, Classical.not_not]
#align spectrum.zero_not_mem_iff spectrum.zero_not_mem_iff
alias ⟨isUnit_of_zero_not_mem, zero_not_mem⟩ := spectrum.zero_not_mem_iff
lemma subset_singleton_zero_compl {a : A} (ha : IsUnit a) : spectrum R a ⊆ {0}ᶜ :=
Set.subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr <| spectrum.zero_not_mem R ha
variable {R}
theorem mem_resolventSet_of_left_right_inverse {r : R} {a b c : A} (h₁ : (↑ₐ r - a) * b = 1)
(h₂ : c * (↑ₐ r - a) = 1) : r ∈ resolventSet R a :=
Units.isUnit ⟨↑ₐ r - a, b, h₁, by rwa [← left_inv_eq_right_inv h₂ h₁]⟩
#align spectrum.mem_resolvent_set_of_left_right_inverse spectrum.mem_resolventSet_of_left_right_inverse
theorem mem_resolventSet_iff {r : R} {a : A} : r ∈ resolventSet R a ↔ IsUnit (↑ₐ r - a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align spectrum.mem_resolvent_set_iff spectrum.mem_resolventSet_iff
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_mem_iff (S : Type*) {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Ring A] [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] {a : A} {r : R} :
algebraMap R S r ∈ spectrum S a ↔ r ∈ spectrum R a := by
simp only [spectrum.mem_iff, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
protected alias ⟨of_algebraMap_mem, algebraMap_mem⟩ := spectrum.algebraMap_mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_algebraMap (S : Type*) {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Ring A] [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] {a : A} :
algebraMap R S ⁻¹' spectrum S a = spectrum R a :=
Set.ext fun _ => spectrum.algebraMap_mem_iff _
@[simp]
theorem resolventSet_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton A] (a : A) : resolventSet R a = Set.univ := by
simp_rw [resolventSet, Subsingleton.elim (algebraMap R A _ - a) 1, isUnit_one, Set.setOf_true]
#align spectrum.resolvent_set_of_subsingleton spectrum.resolventSet_of_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton A] (a : A) : spectrum R a = ∅ := by
rw [spectrum, resolventSet_of_subsingleton, Set.compl_univ]
#align spectrum.of_subsingleton spectrum.of_subsingleton
theorem resolvent_eq {a : A} {r : R} (h : r ∈ resolventSet R a) : resolvent a r = ↑h.unit⁻¹ :=
Ring.inverse_unit h.unit
#align spectrum.resolvent_eq spectrum.resolvent_eq
theorem units_smul_resolvent {r : Rˣ} {s : R} {a : A} :
r • resolvent a (s : R) = resolvent (r⁻¹ • a) (r⁻¹ • s : R) := by
by_cases h : s ∈ spectrum R a
· rw [mem_iff] at h
simp only [resolvent, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] at *
rw [smul_assoc, ← smul_sub]
have h' : ¬IsUnit (r⁻¹ • (s • (1 : A) - a)) := fun hu =>
h (by simpa only [smul_inv_smul] using IsUnit.smul r hu)
simp only [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h', smul_zero]
· simp only [resolvent]
have h' : IsUnit (r • algebraMap R A (r⁻¹ • s) - a) := by
simpa [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc] using not_mem_iff.mp h
rw [← h'.val_subInvSMul, ← (not_mem_iff.mp h).unit_spec, Ring.inverse_unit, Ring.inverse_unit,
h'.val_inv_subInvSMul]
simp only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, smul_inv_smul]
#align spectrum.units_smul_resolvent spectrum.units_smul_resolvent
theorem units_smul_resolvent_self {r : Rˣ} {a : A} :
r • resolvent a (r : R) = resolvent (r⁻¹ • a) (1 : R) := by
simpa only [Units.smul_def, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Units.inv_mul] using
@units_smul_resolvent _ _ _ _ _ r r a
#align spectrum.units_smul_resolvent_self spectrum.units_smul_resolvent_self
/-- The resolvent is a unit when the argument is in the resolvent set. -/
theorem isUnit_resolvent {r : R} {a : A} : r ∈ resolventSet R a ↔ IsUnit (resolvent a r) :=
isUnit_ring_inverse.symm
#align spectrum.is_unit_resolvent spectrum.isUnit_resolvent
theorem inv_mem_resolventSet {r : Rˣ} {a : Aˣ} (h : (r : R) ∈ resolventSet R (a : A)) :
(↑r⁻¹ : R) ∈ resolventSet R (↑a⁻¹ : A) := by
rw [mem_resolventSet_iff, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← Units.smul_def] at h ⊢
rw [IsUnit.smul_sub_iff_sub_inv_smul, inv_inv, IsUnit.sub_iff]
have h₁ : (a : A) * (r • (↑a⁻¹ : A) - 1) = r • (1 : A) - a := by
rw [mul_sub, mul_smul_comm, a.mul_inv, mul_one]
have h₂ : (r • (↑a⁻¹ : A) - 1) * a = r • (1 : A) - a := by
rw [sub_mul, smul_mul_assoc, a.inv_mul, one_mul]
have hcomm : Commute (a : A) (r • (↑a⁻¹ : A) - 1) := by rwa [← h₂] at h₁
exact (hcomm.isUnit_mul_iff.mp (h₁.symm ▸ h)).2
#align spectrum.inv_mem_resolvent_set spectrum.inv_mem_resolventSet
theorem inv_mem_iff {r : Rˣ} {a : Aˣ} : (r : R) ∈ σ (a : A) ↔ (↑r⁻¹ : R) ∈ σ (↑a⁻¹ : A) :=
not_iff_not.2 <| ⟨inv_mem_resolventSet, inv_mem_resolventSet⟩
#align spectrum.inv_mem_iff spectrum.inv_mem_iff
theorem zero_mem_resolventSet_of_unit (a : Aˣ) : 0 ∈ resolventSet R (a : A) := by
simpa only [mem_resolventSet_iff, ← not_mem_iff, zero_not_mem_iff] using a.isUnit
#align spectrum.zero_mem_resolvent_set_of_unit spectrum.zero_mem_resolventSet_of_unit
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_of_unit {a : Aˣ} {r : R} (hr : r ∈ σ (a : A)) : r ≠ 0 := fun hn =>
(hn ▸ hr) (zero_mem_resolventSet_of_unit a)
#align spectrum.ne_zero_of_mem_of_unit spectrum.ne_zero_of_mem_of_unit
theorem add_mem_iff {a : A} {r s : R} : r + s ∈ σ a ↔ r ∈ σ (-↑ₐ s + a) := by
simp only [mem_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← sub_sub, map_add]
#align spectrum.add_mem_iff spectrum.add_mem_iff
theorem add_mem_add_iff {a : A} {r s : R} : r + s ∈ σ (↑ₐ s + a) ↔ r ∈ σ a := by
rw [add_mem_iff, neg_add_cancel_left]
#align spectrum.add_mem_add_iff spectrum.add_mem_add_iff
theorem smul_mem_smul_iff {a : A} {s : R} {r : Rˣ} : r • s ∈ σ (r • a) ↔ s ∈ σ a := by
simp only [mem_iff, not_iff_not, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, ← smul_sub,
isUnit_smul_iff]
#align spectrum.smul_mem_smul_iff spectrum.smul_mem_smul_iff
theorem unit_smul_eq_smul (a : A) (r : Rˣ) : σ (r • a) = r • σ a := by
ext x
have x_eq : x = r • r⁻¹ • x := by simp
nth_rw 1 [x_eq]
rw [smul_mem_smul_iff]
constructor
· exact fun h => ⟨r⁻¹ • x, ⟨h, show r • r⁻¹ • x = x by simp⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨w, _, (x'_eq : r • w = x)⟩
simpa [← x'_eq ]
#align spectrum.unit_smul_eq_smul spectrum.unit_smul_eq_smul
-- `r ∈ σ(a*b) ↔ r ∈ σ(b*a)` for any `r : Rˣ`
theorem unit_mem_mul_iff_mem_swap_mul {a b : A} {r : Rˣ} : ↑r ∈ σ (a * b) ↔ ↑r ∈ σ (b * a) := by
have h₁ : ∀ x y : A, IsUnit (1 - x * y) → IsUnit (1 - y * x) := by
refine fun x y h => ⟨⟨1 - y * x, 1 + y * h.unit.inv * x, ?_, ?_⟩, rfl⟩
· calc
(1 - y * x) * (1 + y * (IsUnit.unit h).inv * x) =
1 - y * x + y * ((1 - x * y) * h.unit.inv) * x := by noncomm_ring
_ = 1 := by simp only [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, IsUnit.mul_val_inv, mul_one, sub_add_cancel]
· calc
(1 + y * (IsUnit.unit h).inv * x) * (1 - y * x) =
1 - y * x + y * (h.unit.inv * (1 - x * y)) * x := by noncomm_ring
_ = 1 := by simp only [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, IsUnit.val_inv_mul, mul_one, sub_add_cancel]
have := Iff.intro (h₁ (r⁻¹ • a) b) (h₁ b (r⁻¹ • a))
rw [mul_smul_comm r⁻¹ b a] at this
simpa only [mem_iff, not_iff_not, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← Units.smul_def,
IsUnit.smul_sub_iff_sub_inv_smul, smul_mul_assoc]
#align spectrum.unit_mem_mul_iff_mem_swap_mul spectrum.unit_mem_mul_iff_mem_swap_mul
theorem preimage_units_mul_eq_swap_mul {a b : A} :
((↑) : Rˣ → R) ⁻¹' σ (a * b) = (↑) ⁻¹' σ (b * a) :=
Set.ext fun _ => unit_mem_mul_iff_mem_swap_mul
#align spectrum.preimage_units_mul_eq_swap_mul spectrum.preimage_units_mul_eq_swap_mul
section Star
variable [InvolutiveStar R] [StarRing A] [StarModule R A]
theorem star_mem_resolventSet_iff {r : R} {a : A} :
star r ∈ resolventSet R a ↔ r ∈ resolventSet R (star a) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩ <;>
simpa only [mem_resolventSet_iff, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, star_sub, star_smul,
star_star, star_one] using IsUnit.star h
#align spectrum.star_mem_resolvent_set_iff spectrum.star_mem_resolventSet_iff
protected theorem map_star (a : A) : σ (star a) = star (σ a) := by
ext
simpa only [Set.mem_star, mem_iff, not_iff_not] using star_mem_resolventSet_iff.symm
#align spectrum.map_star spectrum.map_star
end Star
end ScalarSemiring
section ScalarRing
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v}
variable [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
local notation "σ" => spectrum R
local notation "↑ₐ" => algebraMap R A
-- it would be nice to state this for `subalgebra_class`, but we don't have such a thing yet
theorem subset_subalgebra {S : Subalgebra R A} (a : S) : spectrum R (a : A) ⊆ spectrum R a :=
compl_subset_compl.2 fun _ => IsUnit.map S.val
#align spectrum.subset_subalgebra spectrum.subset_subalgebra
-- this is why it would be nice if `subset_subalgebra` was registered for `subalgebra_class`.
theorem subset_starSubalgebra [StarRing R] [StarRing A] [StarModule R A] {S : StarSubalgebra R A}
(a : S) : spectrum R (a : A) ⊆ spectrum R a :=
compl_subset_compl.2 fun _ => IsUnit.map S.subtype
#align spectrum.subset_star_subalgebra spectrum.subset_starSubalgebra
theorem singleton_add_eq (a : A) (r : R) : {r} + σ a = σ (↑ₐ r + a) :=
ext fun x => by
rw [singleton_add, image_add_left, mem_preimage, add_comm, add_mem_iff, map_neg, neg_neg]
#align spectrum.singleton_add_eq spectrum.singleton_add_eq
theorem add_singleton_eq (a : A) (r : R) : σ a + {r} = σ (a + ↑ₐ r) :=
add_comm {r} (σ a) ▸ add_comm (algebraMap R A r) a ▸ singleton_add_eq a r
#align spectrum.add_singleton_eq spectrum.add_singleton_eq
theorem vadd_eq (a : A) (r : R) : r +ᵥ σ a = σ (↑ₐ r + a) :=
singleton_add.symm.trans <| singleton_add_eq a r
#align spectrum.vadd_eq spectrum.vadd_eq
theorem neg_eq (a : A) : -σ a = σ (-a) :=
Set.ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_neg, mem_iff, map_neg, ← neg_add', IsUnit.neg_iff, sub_neg_eq_add]
#align spectrum.neg_eq spectrum.neg_eq
theorem singleton_sub_eq (a : A) (r : R) : {r} - σ a = σ (↑ₐ r - a) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_eq, singleton_add_eq, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align spectrum.singleton_sub_eq spectrum.singleton_sub_eq
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Spectrum.lean | 331 | 332 | theorem sub_singleton_eq (a : A) (r : R) : σ a - {r} = σ (a - ↑ₐ r) := by |
simpa only [neg_sub, neg_eq] using congr_arg Neg.neg (singleton_sub_eq a r)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attr
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.FinsetOps
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.finset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Finite sets
Terms of type `Finset α` are one way of talking about finite subsets of `α` in mathlib.
Below, `Finset α` is defined as a structure with 2 fields:
1. `val` is a `Multiset α` of elements;
2. `nodup` is a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
Finsets in Lean are constructive in that they have an underlying `List` that enumerates their
elements. In particular, any function that uses the data of the underlying list cannot depend on its
ordering. This is handled on the `Multiset` level by multiset API, so in most cases one needn't
worry about it explicitly.
Finsets give a basic foundation for defining finite sums and products over types:
1. `∑ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`;
2. `∏ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`.
Lean refers to these operations as big operators.
More information can be found in `Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset`.
Finsets are directly used to define fintypes in Lean.
A `Fintype α` instance for a type `α` consists of a universal `Finset α` containing every term of
`α`, called `univ`. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
There is also `univ'`, the noncomputable partner to `univ`,
which is defined to be `α` as a finset if `α` is finite,
and the empty finset otherwise. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
`Finset.card`, the size of a finset is defined in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card`.
This is then used to define `Fintype.card`, the size of a type.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset`: Defines a type for the finite subsets of `α`.
Constructing a `Finset` requires two pieces of data: `val`, a `Multiset α` of elements,
and `nodup`, a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
* `Finset.instMembershipFinset`: Defines membership `a ∈ (s : Finset α)`.
* `Finset.instCoeTCFinsetSet`: Provides a coercion `s : Finset α` to `s : Set α`.
* `Finset.instCoeSortFinsetType`: Coerce `s : Finset α` to the type of all `x ∈ s`.
* `Finset.induction_on`: Induction on finsets. To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty finset, and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the finset obtained by inserting a new element.
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Finset constructions
* `Finset.instSingletonFinset`: Denoted by `{a}`; the finset consisting of one element.
* `Finset.empty`: Denoted by `∅`. The finset associated to any type consisting of no elements.
* `Finset.range`: For any `n : ℕ`, `range n` is equal to `{0, 1, ... , n - 1} ⊆ ℕ`.
This convention is consistent with other languages and normalizes `card (range n) = n`.
Beware, `n` is not in `range n`.
* `Finset.attach`: Given `s : Finset α`, `attach s` forms a finset of elements of the subtype
`{a // a ∈ s}`; in other words, it attaches elements to a proof of membership in the set.
### Finsets from functions
* `Finset.filter`: Given a decidable predicate `p : α → Prop`, `s.filter p` is
the finset consisting of those elements in `s` satisfying the predicate `p`.
### The lattice structure on subsets of finsets
There is a natural lattice structure on the subsets of a set.
In Lean, we use lattice notation to talk about things involving unions and intersections. See
`Mathlib.Order.Lattice`. For the lattice structure on finsets, `⊥` is called `bot` with `⊥ = ∅` and
`⊤` is called `top` with `⊤ = univ`.
* `Finset.instHasSubsetFinset`: Lots of API about lattices, otherwise behaves as one would expect.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: Defines `s ∪ t` (or `s ⊔ t`) as the union of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.sup`/`Finset.biUnion` for finite unions.
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: Defines `s ∩ t` (or `s ⊓ t`) as the intersection of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.inf` for finite intersections.
### Operations on two or more finsets
* `insert` and `Finset.cons`: For any `a : α`, `insert s a` returns `s ∪ {a}`. `cons s a h`
returns the same except that it requires a hypothesis stating that `a` is not already in `s`.
This does not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.erase`: For any `a : α`, `erase s a` returns `s` with the element `a` removed.
* `Finset.instSDiffFinset`: Defines the set difference `s \ t` for finsets `s` and `t`.
* `Finset.product`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of `α × β`.
For arbitrary dependent products, see `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi`.
### Predicates on finsets
* `Disjoint`: defined via the lattice structure on finsets; two sets are disjoint if their
intersection is empty.
* `Finset.Nonempty`: A finset is nonempty if it has elements. This is equivalent to saying `s ≠ ∅`.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib.Data.Equiv` files describe a general type of equivalence, so look in there for any
lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that `s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen
assert_not_exists Multiset.Powerset
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Multiset Subtype Nat Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure Finset (α : Type*) where
/-- The underlying multiset -/
val : Multiset α
/-- `val` contains no duplicates -/
nodup : Nodup val
#align finset Finset
instance Multiset.canLiftFinset {α} : CanLift (Multiset α) (Finset α) Finset.val Multiset.Nodup :=
⟨fun m hm => ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
#align multiset.can_lift_finset Multiset.canLiftFinset
namespace Finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : Finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩, ⟨t, _⟩, h => by cases h; rfl
#align finset.eq_of_veq Finset.eq_of_veq
theorem val_injective : Injective (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ => eq_of_veq
#align finset.val_injective Finset.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem val_inj {s t : Finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
val_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.val_inj Finset.val_inj
@[simp]
theorem dedup_eq_self [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : dedup s.1 = s.1 :=
s.2.dedup
#align finset.dedup_eq_self Finset.dedup_eq_self
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Finset α)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
#align finset.has_decidable_eq Finset.decidableEq
/-! ### membership -/
instance : Membership α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_def Finset.mem_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_val {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s.1 ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_val Finset.mem_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @Finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_mk Finset.mem_mk
instance decidableMem [_h : DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Multiset.decidableMem _ _
#align finset.decidable_mem Finset.decidableMem
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ a = b) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ b = a) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
/-! ### set coercion -/
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
@[coe] def toSet (s : Finset α) : Set α :=
{ a | a ∈ s }
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : CoeTC (Finset α) (Set α) :=
⟨toSet⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ (s : Set α) ↔ a ∈ (s : Finset α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_coe Finset.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem {α} {s : Finset α} : { a | a ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align finset.set_of_mem Finset.setOf_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_mem {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) : ↑x ∈ s :=
x.2
#align finset.coe_mem Finset.coe_mem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mk_coe {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) {h} : (⟨x, h⟩ : (s : Set α)) = x :=
Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align finset.mk_coe Finset.mk_coe
instance decidableMem' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ (s : Set α)) :=
s.decidableMem _
#align finset.decidable_mem' Finset.decidableMem'
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans <| s₁.nodup.ext s₂.nodup
#align finset.ext_iff Finset.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
#align finset.ext Finset.ext
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
Set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
#align finset.coe_inj Finset.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective {α} : Injective ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) := fun _s _t => coe_inj.1
#align finset.coe_injective Finset.coe_injective
/-! ### type coercion -/
/-- Coercion from a finset to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type u} : CoeSort (Finset α) (Type u) :=
⟨fun s => { x // x ∈ s }⟩
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem forall_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align finset.forall_coe Finset.forall_coe
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem exists_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align finset.exists_coe Finset.exists_coe
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift (ι : Type*) (α : ι → Type*) [_ne : ∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
(s : Finset ι) : CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α (· ∈ s)
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift' (ι α : Type*) [_ne : Nonempty α] (s : Finset ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiFinsetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift' Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift'
instance FinsetCoe.canLift (s : Finset α) : CanLift α s (↑) fun a => a ∈ s where
prf a ha := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align finset.finset_coe.can_lift Finset.FinsetCoe.canLift
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sort_coe (s : Finset α) : ((s : Set α) : Sort _) = s :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_sort_coe Finset.coe_sort_coe
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
section Subset
variable {s t : Finset α}
instance : HasSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Finset α) where
le := (· ⊆ ·)
lt := (· ⊂ ·)
le_refl s a := id
le_trans s t u hst htu a ha := htu <| hst ha
le_antisymm s t hst hts := ext fun a => ⟨@hst _, @hts _⟩
instance : IsRefl (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
theorem subset_def : s ⊆ t ↔ s.1 ⊆ t.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_def Finset.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.ssubset_def Finset.ssubset_def
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ s :=
Multiset.Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.refl Finset.Subset.refl
protected theorem Subset.rfl {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.rfl Finset.Subset.rfl
protected theorem subset_of_eq {s t : Finset α} (h : s = t) : s ⊆ t :=
h ▸ Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset_of_eq Finset.subset_of_eq
theorem Subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ :=
Multiset.Subset.trans
#align finset.subset.trans Finset.Subset.trans
theorem Superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ := fun h' h =>
Subset.trans h h'
#align finset.superset.trans Finset.Superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
Multiset.mem_of_subset
#align finset.mem_of_subset Finset.mem_of_subset
theorem not_mem_mono {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) {a : α} : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align finset.not_mem_mono Finset.not_mem_mono
theorem Subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext fun a => ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
#align finset.subset.antisymm Finset.Subset.antisymm
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_iff Finset.subset_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_subset Finset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
le_iff_subset s₁.2
#align finset.val_le_iff Finset.val_le_iff
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
#align finset.subset.antisymm_iff Finset.Subset.antisymm_iff
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∉ t := by simp only [← coe_subset, Set.not_subset, mem_coe]
#align finset.not_subset Finset.not_subset
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.le_eq_subset Finset.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_subset : ((· < ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.lt_eq_subset Finset.lt_eq_subset
theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.le_iff_subset Finset.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.lt_iff_ssubset Finset.lt_iff_ssubset
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁ by simp only [Set.ssubset_def, Finset.coe_subset]
#align finset.coe_ssubset Finset.coe_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff <| not_congr val_le_iff
#align finset.val_lt_iff Finset.val_lt_iff
lemma val_strictMono : StrictMono (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ ↦ val_lt_iff.2
theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne _ _ s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
#align finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊂ s₂) : ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align finset.exists_of_ssubset Finset.exists_of_ssubset
instance isWellFounded_ssubset : IsWellFounded (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
Subrelation.isWellFounded (InvImage _ _) val_lt_iff.2
#align finset.is_well_founded_ssubset Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Finset α) :=
Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
#align finset.is_well_founded_lt Finset.wellFoundedLT
end Subset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
/-! ### Order embedding from `Finset α` to `Set α` -/
/-- Coercion to `Set α` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α :=
⟨⟨(↑), coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
#align finset.coe_emb Finset.coeEmb
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeEmb : ⇑(coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α) = ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_coe_emb Finset.coe_coeEmb
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.Nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def Nonempty (s : Finset α) : Prop := ∃ x : α, x ∈ s
#align finset.nonempty Finset.Nonempty
-- Porting note: Much longer than in Lean3
instance decidableNonempty {s : Finset α} : Decidable s.Nonempty :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (motive := fun s : Multiset α => Decidable (∃ a, a ∈ s)) s.1
(fun l : List α =>
match l with
| [] => isFalse <| by simp
| a::l => isTrue ⟨a, by simp⟩)
#align finset.decidable_nonempty Finset.decidableNonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonempty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_nonempty Finset.coe_nonempty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : Nonempty (s : Type _) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align finset.nonempty_coe_sort Finset.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.to_set⟩ := coe_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.to_set Finset.Nonempty.to_set
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align finset.nonempty.coe_sort Finset.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem Nonempty.exists_mem {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x : α, x ∈ s :=
h
#align finset.nonempty.bex Finset.Nonempty.exists_mem
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias Nonempty.bex := Nonempty.exists_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono {s t : Finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
Set.Nonempty.mono hst hs
#align finset.nonempty.mono Finset.Nonempty.mono
theorem Nonempty.forall_const {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) {p : Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s, p) ↔ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
⟨fun h => h x hx, fun h _ _ => h⟩
#align finset.nonempty.forall_const Finset.Nonempty.forall_const
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty s :=
nonempty_coe_sort.2
#align finset.nonempty.to_subtype Finset.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _hx⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align finset.nonempty.to_type Finset.Nonempty.to_type
/-! ### empty -/
section Empty
variable {s : Finset α}
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : Finset α :=
⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
#align finset.empty Finset.empty
instance : EmptyCollection (Finset α) :=
⟨Finset.empty⟩
instance inhabitedFinset : Inhabited (Finset α) :=
⟨∅⟩
#align finset.inhabited_finset Finset.inhabitedFinset
@[simp]
theorem empty_val : (∅ : Finset α).1 = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.empty_val Finset.empty_val
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : Finset α) := by
-- Porting note: was `id`. `a ∈ List.nil` is no longer definitionally equal to `False`
simp only [mem_def, empty_val, not_mem_zero, not_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_empty Finset.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Finset α).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => not_mem_empty x hx
#align finset.not_nonempty_empty Finset.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, nodup_zero⟩ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_zero Finset.mk_zero
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ := fun e =>
not_mem_empty a <| e ▸ h
#align finset.ne_empty_of_mem Finset.ne_empty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
(Exists.elim h) fun _a => ne_empty_of_mem
#align finset.nonempty.ne_empty Finset.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
zero_subset _
#align finset.empty_subset Finset.empty_subset
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
#align finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
-- Porting note: used `id`
⟨by rintro rfl x; apply not_mem_empty, fun h => eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
#align finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero {s : Finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
@val_inj _ s ∅
#align finset.val_eq_zero Finset.val_eq_zero
theorem subset_empty {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
#align finset.subset_empty Finset.subset_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_ssubset_empty (s : Finset α) : ¬s ⊂ ∅ := fun h =>
let ⟨_, he, _⟩ := exists_of_ssubset h
-- Porting note: was `he`
not_mem_empty _ he
#align finset.not_ssubset_empty Finset.not_ssubset_empty
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.Nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
#align finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
#align finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.not.trans not_not
#align finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
by_cases Or.inl fun h => Or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h)
#align finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_empty : ((∅ : Finset α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align finset.coe_empty Finset.coe_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by rw [← coe_empty, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_empty Finset.coe_eq_empty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : IsEmpty (s : Type _) ↔ s = ∅ := by
simpa using @Set.isEmpty_coe_sort α s
#align finset.is_empty_coe_sort Finset.isEmpty_coe_sort
instance instIsEmpty : IsEmpty (∅ : Finset α) :=
isEmpty_coe_sort.2 rfl
/-- A `Finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ :=
Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
#align finset.eq_empty_of_is_empty Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance : OrderBot (Finset α) where
bot := ∅
bot_le := empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.bot_eq_empty Finset.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Finset α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align finset.empty_ssubset Finset.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align finset.nonempty.empty_ssubset Finset.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
end Empty
/-! ### singleton -/
section Singleton
variable {s : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `{a} : Finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `DecidableEq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : Singleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).1 = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_val Finset.singleton_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Finset α) ↔ b = a :=
Multiset.mem_singleton
#align finset.mem_singleton Finset.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Finset α)) : x = y :=
mem_singleton.1 h
#align finset.eq_of_mem_singleton Finset.eq_of_mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : Finset α) ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr mem_singleton
#align finset.not_mem_singleton Finset.not_mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Finset α) :=
-- Porting note: was `Or.inl rfl`
mem_singleton.mpr rfl
#align finset.mem_singleton_self Finset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Finset α} : s.val = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← val_inj]
rfl
#align finset.val_eq_singleton_iff Finset.val_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Finset α) := fun _a _b h =>
mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _)
#align finset.singleton_injective Finset.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj : ({a} : Finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.singleton_inj Finset.singleton_inj
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
#align finset.singleton_nonempty Finset.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
#align finset.singleton_ne_empty Finset.singleton_ne_empty
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Finset α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align finset.empty_ssubset_singleton Finset.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : (({a} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_singleton Finset.coe_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (s : Set α) = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_singleton Finset.coe_eq_singleton
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_subset_singleton : (s : Set α) ⊆ {a} ↔ s ⊆ {a} := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
@[norm_cast]
lemma singleton_subset_coe : {a} ⊆ (s : Set α) ↔ {a} ⊆ s := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor <;> intro t
· rw [t]
exact ⟨Finset.mem_singleton_self _, fun _ => Finset.mem_singleton.1⟩
· ext
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨t.right _, fun r => r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· rintro ⟨hne, h_uniq⟩
rw [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem]
refine ⟨?_, h_uniq⟩
rw [← h_uniq hne.choose hne.choose_spec]
exact hne.choose_spec
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
theorem nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default [Unique α] {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty ↔ s = {default} := by
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default Finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
alias ⟨Nonempty.eq_singleton_default, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
#align finset.nonempty.eq_singleton_default Finset.Nonempty.eq_singleton_default
theorem singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : Finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s := by
simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, ExistsUnique]
#align finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem singleton_subset_set_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : ↑({a} : Finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [coe_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
#align finset.singleton_subset_set_iff Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
#align finset.singleton_subset_iff Finset.singleton_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton, Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq, coe_eq_empty, coe_eq_singleton]
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff Finset.subset_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Finset α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align finset.singleton_subset_singleton Finset.singleton_subset_singleton
protected theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align finset.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => mem_singleton
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff' Finset.subset_singleton_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_singleton, Set.ssubset_singleton_iff, coe_eq_empty]
#align finset.ssubset_singleton_iff Finset.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
/-- A finset is nontrivial if it has at least two elements. -/
protected abbrev Nontrivial (s : Finset α) : Prop := (s : Set α).Nontrivial
#align finset.nontrivial Finset.Nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_empty : ¬ (∅ : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_empty Finset.not_nontrivial_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_singleton : ¬ ({a} : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_singleton Finset.not_nontrivial_singleton
theorem Nontrivial.ne_singleton (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ {a} := by
rintro rfl; exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs
#align finset.nontrivial.ne_singleton Finset.Nontrivial.ne_singleton
nonrec lemma Nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.Nontrivial) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := hs.exists_ne _
theorem eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton]; exact Set.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha
#align finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨Nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
#align finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton Finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton
theorem Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.Nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.Nontrivial :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left <| Exists.intro a
#align finset.nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
instance instNontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Finset α) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨⟨{a}, ∅, singleton_ne_empty _⟩⟩
#align finset.nontrivial' Finset.instNontrivial
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Finset α) where
default := ∅
uniq _ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
instance (i : α) : Unique ({i} : Finset α) where
default := ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩
uniq j := Subtype.ext <| mem_singleton.mp j.2
@[simp]
lemma default_singleton (i : α) : ((default : ({i} : Finset α)) : α) = i := rfl
end Singleton
/-! ### cons -/
section Cons
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `DecidableEq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : Finset α :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
#align finset.cons Finset.cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {h} : b ∈ s.cons a h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons
#align finset.mem_cons Finset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Finset α} {hb : b ∉ s} (ha : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s hb :=
Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem ha
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) {h} : a ∈ cons a s h :=
Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _
#align finset.mem_cons_self Finset.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.cons_val Finset.cons_val
theorem forall_mem_cons (h : a ∉ s) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.forall_mem_cons Finset.forall_mem_cons
/-- Useful in proofs by induction. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_cons {p : α → Prop} {h : a ∉ s} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) (x)
(h : x ∈ s) : p x :=
H _ <| mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.forall_of_forall_cons Finset.forall_of_forall_cons
@[simp]
theorem mk_cons {s : Multiset α} (h : (a ::ₘ s).Nodup) :
(⟨a ::ₘ s, h⟩ : Finset α) = cons a ⟨s, (nodup_cons.1 h).2⟩ (nodup_cons.1 h).1 :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_cons Finset.mk_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_empty (a : α) : cons a ∅ (not_mem_empty _) = {a} := rfl
#align finset.cons_empty Finset.cons_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_cons.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩
#align finset.nonempty_cons Finset.nonempty_cons
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk {m : Multiset α} {hm} : (⟨m, hm⟩ : Finset α).Nonempty ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
induction m using Multiset.induction_on <;> simp
#align finset.nonempty_mk Finset.nonempty_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_cons {a s h} : (@cons α a s h : Set α) = insert a (s : Set α) := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_cons Finset.coe_cons
theorem subset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.subset_cons _ _
#align finset.subset_cons Finset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.ssubset_cons h
#align finset.ssubset_cons Finset.ssubset_cons
theorem cons_subset {h : a ∉ s} : s.cons a h ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
Multiset.cons_subset
#align finset.cons_subset Finset.cons_subset
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 940 | 941 | theorem cons_subset_cons {hs ht} : s.cons a hs ⊆ t.cons a ht ↔ s ⊆ t := by |
rwa [← coe_subset, coe_cons, coe_cons, Set.insert_subset_insert_iff, coe_subset]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives
This file defines the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` where `𝕜` is a
normed field and `F` is a normed space over this field. The derivative of
such a function `f` at a point `x` is given by an element `f' : F`.
The theory is developed analogously to the [Fréchet
derivatives](./fderiv.html). We first introduce predicates defined in terms
of the corresponding predicates for Fréchet derivatives:
- `HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
- `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
- `HasDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x`.
- `HasStrictDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability, i.e.,
`f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o (y - z)` as `y, z → x`.
For the last two notions we also define a functional version:
- `derivWithin f s x` is a derivative of `f` at `x` within `s`. If the
derivative does not exist, then `derivWithin f s x` equals zero.
- `deriv f x` is a derivative of `f` at `x`. If the derivative does not
exist, then `deriv f x` equals zero.
The theorems `fderivWithin_derivWithin` and `fderiv_deriv` show that the
one-dimensional derivatives coincide with the general Fréchet derivatives.
We also show the existence and compute the derivatives of:
- constants
- the identity function
- linear maps (in `Linear.lean`)
- addition (in `Add.lean`)
- sum of finitely many functions (in `Add.lean`)
- negation (in `Add.lean`)
- subtraction (in `Add.lean`)
- star (in `Star.lean`)
- multiplication of two functions in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Mul.lean`)
- multiplication of a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` and of a function in `𝕜 → E` (in `Mul.lean`)
- powers of a function (in `Pow.lean` and `ZPow.lean`)
- inverse `x → x⁻¹` (in `Inv.lean`)
- division (in `Inv.lean`)
- composition of a function in `𝕜 → F` with a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Comp.lean`)
- composition of a function in `F → E` with a function in `𝕜 → F` (in `Comp.lean`)
- inverse function (assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `Inverse.lean`)
- polynomials (in `Polynomial.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
We set up the simplifier so that it can compute the derivative of simple functions. For instance,
```lean
example (x : ℝ) :
deriv (fun x ↦ cos (sin x) * exp x) x = (cos(sin(x))-sin(sin(x))*cos(x))*exp(x) := by
simp; ring
```
The relationship between the derivative of a function and its definition from a standard
undergraduate course as the limit of the slope `(f y - f x) / (y - x)` as `y` tends to `𝓝[≠] x`
is developed in the file `Slope.lean`.
## Implementation notes
Most of the theorems are direct restatements of the corresponding theorems
for Fréchet derivatives.
The strategy to construct simp lemmas that give the simplifier the possibility to compute
derivatives is the same as the one for differentiability statements, as explained in
`FDeriv/Basic.lean`. See the explanations there.
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges along the filter `L`.
-/
def HasDerivAtFilter (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) (L : Filter 𝕜) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x L
#align has_deriv_at_filter HasDerivAtFilter
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def HasDerivWithinAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
#align has_deriv_within_at HasDerivWithinAt
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def HasDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
#align has_deriv_at HasDerivAt
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability.
That is, `f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. -/
def HasStrictDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x
#align has_strict_deriv_at HasStrictDerivAt
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • derivWithin f s x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def derivWithin (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x 1
#align deriv_within derivWithin
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivAt f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv f x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def deriv (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderiv 𝕜 f x 1
#align deriv deriv
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L` in terms of `HasDerivAtFilter` -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L := by simp [HasDerivAtFilter]
#align has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_has_deriv_at_filter hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L → HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter.mp
#align has_fderiv_at_filter.has_deriv_at_filter HasFDerivAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_fderiv_within_at_iff_has_deriv_within_at hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt
/-- Expressing `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasFDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_has_fderiv_within_at hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt.mp
#align has_fderiv_within_at.has_deriv_within_at HasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt.mp
#align has_deriv_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at HasDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasDerivAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_fderiv_at_iff_has_deriv_at hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x → HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt.mp
#align has_fderiv_at.has_deriv_at HasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x := by
simp [HasStrictDerivAt, HasStrictFDerivAt]
#align has_strict_fderiv_at_iff_has_strict_deriv_at hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x → HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt.mp
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.has_strict_deriv_at HasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt :
HasStrictDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_strict_deriv_at_iff_has_strict_fderiv_at hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasStrictDerivAt.hasStrictFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt
#align has_strict_deriv_at.has_strict_fderiv_at HasStrictDerivAt.hasStrictFDerivAt
/-- Expressing `HasDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasFDerivAt` -/
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
#align has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasDerivAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
#align has_deriv_at.has_fderiv_at HasDerivAt.hasFDerivAt
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h]
simp
#align deriv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_of_derivWithin_ne_zero (h : derivWithin f s x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
not_imp_comm.1 derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h
#align differentiable_within_at_of_deriv_within_ne_zero differentiableWithinAt_of_derivWithin_ne_zero
theorem deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : deriv f x = 0 := by
unfold deriv
rw [fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h]
simp
#align deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt
theorem differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h : deriv f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
not_imp_comm.1 deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h
#align differentiable_at_of_deriv_ne_zero differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq_deriv (s : Set 𝕜) (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h₁ : HasDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq H h h₁
#align unique_diff_within_at.eq_deriv UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq_deriv
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_at_filter_iff_is_o hasDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' : 𝕜 => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) L (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
(fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝[s] x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_is_o hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝 x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
#align has_deriv_at_iff_is_o hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
#align has_deriv_at_iff_tendsto hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_deriv_at_filter.is_O_sub HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hf' : f' ≠ 0) :
(fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
suffices AntilipschitzWith ‖f'‖₊⁻¹ (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') from hf.isBigO_sub_rev this
AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') fun x => by
simp [norm_smul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (mt norm_eq_zero.1 hf')]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_deriv_at_filter.is_O_sub_rev HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivAt f f' x :=
h.hasFDerivAt
#align has_strict_deriv_at.has_deriv_at HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set' {s t : Set 𝕜} (y : 𝕜) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' y h
#align has_deriv_within_at_congr_set' hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set'
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set {s t : Set 𝕜} (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
#align has_deriv_within_at_congr_set hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.congr_set, _⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
#align has_deriv_within_at.congr_set HasDerivWithinAt.congr_set
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {x}) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _
#align has_deriv_within_at_diff_singleton hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
#align has_deriv_within_at_Ioi_iff_Ici hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ici_of_Ioi HasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_of_Ici HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iio x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iic x) x := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
#align has_deriv_within_at_Iio_iff_Iic hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Iic_of_Iio, HasDerivWithinAt.Iio_of_Iic⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic
#align has_deriv_within_at.Iic_of_Iio HasDerivWithinAt.Iic_of_Iio
#align has_deriv_within_at.Iio_of_Iic HasDerivWithinAt.Iio_of_Iic
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo [LinearOrder 𝕜] [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] {x y : 𝕜} (h : x < y) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioo x y) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter <| Iio_mem_nhds h
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_iff_Ioo HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ioo, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioo_of_Ioi⟩ := HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioi_of_Ioo HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ioo
#align has_deriv_within_at.Ioo_of_Ioi HasDerivWithinAt.Ioo_of_Ioi
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h => f (x + h) - f x - h • f') =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
#align has_deriv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.mono h hst
#align has_deriv_at_filter.mono HasDerivAtFilter.mono
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.mono HasDerivWithinAt.mono
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem h hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.mono_of_mem HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem
#align has_deriv_within_at.nhds_within HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem
theorem HasDerivAt.hasDerivAtFilter (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter h hL
#align has_deriv_at.has_deriv_at_filter HasDerivAt.hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_at.has_deriv_within_at HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_within_at.differentiable_within_at HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt h
#align has_deriv_at.differentiable_at HasDerivAt.differentiableAt
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_univ : HasDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
#align has_deriv_within_at_univ hasDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem HasDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| h₀.hasFDerivAt.unique h₁
#align has_deriv_at.unique HasDerivAt.unique
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' h
#align has_deriv_within_at_inter' hasDerivWithinAt_inter'
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter h
#align has_deriv_within_at_inter hasDerivWithinAt_inter
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (ht : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x :=
hs.hasFDerivWithinAt.union ht.hasFDerivWithinAt
#align has_deriv_within_at.union HasDerivWithinAt.union
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAt f f' x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt h hs
#align has_deriv_within_at.has_deriv_at HasDerivWithinAt.hasDerivAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f s x) s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt
#align differentiable_at.has_deriv_at DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_deriv_iff : HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableAt, fun h => h.hasDerivAt⟩
#align has_deriv_at_deriv_iff hasDerivAt_deriv_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_derivWithin_iff :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f s x) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableWithinAt, fun h => h.hasDerivWithinAt⟩
#align has_deriv_within_at_deriv_within_iff hasDerivWithinAt_derivWithin_iff
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasDerivAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasDerivAt
#align differentiable_on.has_deriv_at DifferentiableOn.hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.deriv (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : deriv f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasDerivAt.unique h
#align has_deriv_at.deriv HasDerivAt.deriv
theorem deriv_eq {f' : 𝕜 → F} (h : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) : deriv f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).deriv
#align deriv_eq deriv_eq
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : derivWithin f s x = f' :=
hxs.eq_deriv _ h.differentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h
#align has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within HasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin
theorem fderivWithin_derivWithin : (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = derivWithin f s x :=
rfl
#align fderiv_within_deriv_within fderivWithin_derivWithin
theorem derivWithin_fderivWithin :
smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (derivWithin f s x) = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by simp [derivWithin]
#align deriv_within_fderiv_within derivWithin_fderivWithin
theorem norm_derivWithin_eq_norm_fderivWithin : ‖derivWithin f s x‖ = ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖ := by
simp [← derivWithin_fderivWithin]
theorem fderiv_deriv : (fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = deriv f x :=
rfl
#align fderiv_deriv fderiv_deriv
theorem deriv_fderiv : smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (deriv f x) = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by simp [deriv]
#align deriv_fderiv deriv_fderiv
theorem norm_deriv_eq_norm_fderiv : ‖deriv f x‖ = ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖ := by
simp [← deriv_fderiv]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic.lean | 487 | 490 | theorem DifferentiableAt.derivWithin (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin f s x = deriv f x := by |
unfold derivWithin deriv
rw [h.fderivWithin hxs]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Ideal
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Division
#align_import ring_theory.mv_polynomial.ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"72c366d0475675f1309d3027d3d7d47ee4423951"
/-!
# Lemmas about ideals of `MvPolynomial`
Notably this contains results about monomial ideals.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.mem_ideal_span_monomial_image`
* `MvPolynomial.mem_ideal_span_X_image`
-/
variable {σ R : Type*}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable [CommSemiring R]
/-- `x` is in a monomial ideal generated by `s` iff every element of its support dominates one of
the generators. Note that `si ≤ xi` is analogous to saying that the monomial corresponding to `si`
divides the monomial corresponding to `xi`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/Ideal.lean | 32 | 36 | theorem mem_ideal_span_monomial_image {x : MvPolynomial σ R} {s : Set (σ →₀ ℕ)} :
x ∈ Ideal.span ((fun s => monomial s (1 : R)) '' s) ↔ ∀ xi ∈ x.support, ∃ si ∈ s, si ≤ xi := by |
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.mem_ideal_span_of'_image.trans ?_
simp_rw [le_iff_exists_add, add_comm]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import algebra.ring_quot from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e5820f6c8fcf1b75bcd7738ae4da1c5896191f72"
/-!
# Quotients of non-commutative rings
Unfortunately, ideals have only been developed in the commutative case as `Ideal`,
and it's not immediately clear how one should formalise ideals in the non-commutative case.
In this file, we directly define the quotient of a semiring by any relation,
by building a bigger relation that represents the ideal generated by that relation.
We prove the universal properties of the quotient, and recommend avoiding relying on the actual
definition, which is made irreducible for this purpose.
Since everything runs in parallel for quotients of `R`-algebras, we do that case at the same time.
-/
universe uR uS uT uA u₄
variable {R : Type uR} [Semiring R]
variable {S : Type uS} [CommSemiring S]
variable {T : Type uT}
variable {A : Type uA} [Semiring A] [Algebra S A]
namespace RingCon
instance (c : RingCon A) : Algebra S c.Quotient where
smul := (· • ·)
toRingHom := c.mk'.comp (algebraMap S A)
commutes' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.smul_def _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algebraMap (c : RingCon A) (s : S) :
(algebraMap S A s : c.Quotient) = algebraMap S _ s :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_algebra_map RingCon.coe_algebraMap
end RingCon
namespace RingQuot
/-- Given an arbitrary relation `r` on a ring, we strengthen it to a relation `Rel r`,
such that the equivalence relation generated by `Rel r` has `x ~ y` if and only if
`x - y` is in the ideal generated by elements `a - b` such that `r a b`.
-/
inductive Rel (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of ⦃x y : R⦄ (h : r x y) : Rel r x y
| add_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_right ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r b c → Rel r (a * b) (a * c)
#align ring_quot.rel RingQuot.Rel
theorem Rel.add_right {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) : Rel r (a + b) (a + c) := by
rw [add_comm a b, add_comm a c]
exact Rel.add_left h
#align ring_quot.rel.add_right RingQuot.Rel.add_right
theorem Rel.neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (-a) (-b) := by simp only [neg_eq_neg_one_mul a, neg_eq_neg_one_mul b, Rel.mul_right h]
#align ring_quot.rel.neg RingQuot.Rel.neg
theorem Rel.sub_left {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (a - c) (b - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.add_left]
#align ring_quot.rel.sub_left RingQuot.Rel.sub_left
theorem Rel.sub_right {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) :
Rel r (a - b) (a - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.neg.add_right]
#align ring_quot.rel.sub_right RingQuot.Rel.sub_right
theorem Rel.smul {r : A → A → Prop} (k : S) ⦃a b : A⦄ (h : Rel r a b) : Rel r (k • a) (k • b) := by
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, Rel.mul_right h]
#align ring_quot.rel.smul RingQuot.Rel.smul
/-- `EqvGen (RingQuot.Rel r)` is a ring congruence. -/
def ringCon (r : R → R → Prop) : RingCon R where
r := EqvGen (Rel r)
iseqv := EqvGen.is_equivalence _
add' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.add_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| EqvGen.refl _)
mul' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.mul_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| EqvGen.refl _)
#align ring_quot.ring_con RingQuot.ringCon
theorem eqvGen_rel_eq (r : R → R → Prop) : EqvGen (Rel r) = RingConGen.Rel r := by
ext x₁ x₂
constructor
· intro h
induction h with
| rel _ _ h => induction h with
| of => exact RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ ‹_›
| add_left _ h => exact h.add (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_left _ h => exact h.mul (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_right _ h => exact (RingConGen.Rel.refl _).mul h
| refl => exact RingConGen.Rel.refl _
| symm => exact RingConGen.Rel.symm ‹_›
| trans => exact RingConGen.Rel.trans ‹_› ‹_›
· intro h
induction h with
| of => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ (Rel.of ‹_›)
| refl => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).refl _
| symm => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).symm ‹_›
| trans => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).trans ‹_› ‹_›
| add => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).add ‹_› ‹_›
| mul => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).mul ‹_› ‹_›
#align ring_quot.eqv_gen_rel_eq RingQuot.eqvGen_rel_eq
end RingQuot
/-- The quotient of a ring by an arbitrary relation. -/
structure RingQuot (r : R → R → Prop) where
toQuot : Quot (RingQuot.Rel r)
#align ring_quot RingQuot
namespace RingQuot
variable (r : R → R → Prop)
-- can't be irreducible, causes diamonds in ℕ-algebras
private def natCast (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ n⟩
private irreducible_def zero : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩
private irreducible_def one : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩
private irreducible_def add : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· + ·) Rel.add_right Rel.add_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def mul : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· * ·) Rel.mul_right Rel.mul_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ -a) Rel.neg a⟩
private irreducible_def sub {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) :
RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ Sub.sub Rel.sub_right Rel.sub_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def npow (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ =>
⟨Quot.lift (fun a ↦ Quot.mk (RingQuot.Rel r) (a ^ n))
(fun a b (h : Rel r a b) ↦ by
-- note we can't define a `Rel.pow` as `Rel` isn't reflexive so `Rel r 1 1` isn't true
dsimp only
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
-- Porting note:
-- `simpa [mul_def] using congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) (Quot.sound h) ih`
-- mysteriously doesn't work
have := congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) ih (Quot.sound h)
dsimp only at this
simp? [mul_def] at this says simp only [mul_def, Quot.map₂_mk, mk.injEq] at this
exact this)
a⟩
-- note: this cannot be irreducible, as otherwise diamonds don't commute.
private def smul [Algebra S R] (n : S) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ n • a) (Rel.smul n) a⟩
instance : NatCast (RingQuot r) :=
⟨natCast r⟩
instance : Zero (RingQuot r) :=
⟨zero r⟩
instance : One (RingQuot r) :=
⟨one r⟩
instance : Add (RingQuot r) :=
⟨add r⟩
instance : Mul (RingQuot r) :=
⟨mul r⟩
instance : NatPow (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun x n ↦ npow r n x⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Neg (RingQuot r) :=
⟨neg r⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Sub (RingQuot r) :=
⟨sub r⟩
instance [Algebra S R] : SMul S (RingQuot r) :=
⟨smul r⟩
theorem zero_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩ : RingQuot r) = 0 :=
show _ = zero r by rw [zero_def]
#align ring_quot.zero_quot RingQuot.zero_quot
theorem one_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩ : RingQuot r) = 1 :=
show _ = one r by rw [one_def]
#align ring_quot.one_quot RingQuot.one_quot
theorem add_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ + ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a + b)⟩ := by
show add r _ _ = _
rw [add_def]
rfl
#align ring_quot.add_quot RingQuot.add_quot
theorem mul_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ * ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a * b)⟩ := by
show mul r _ _ = _
rw [mul_def]
rfl
#align ring_quot.mul_quot RingQuot.mul_quot
theorem pow_quot {a} {n : ℕ} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ ^ n : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a ^ n)⟩ := by
show npow r _ _ = _
rw [npow_def]
#align ring_quot.pow_quot RingQuot.pow_quot
theorem neg_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a} :
(-⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (-a)⟩ := by
show neg r _ = _
rw [neg_def]
rfl
#align ring_quot.neg_quot RingQuot.neg_quot
theorem sub_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a b} :
(⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ - ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a - b)⟩ := by
show sub r _ _ = _
rw [sub_def]
rfl
#align ring_quot.sub_quot RingQuot.sub_quot
| Mathlib/Algebra/RingQuot.lean | 267 | 271 | theorem smul_quot [Algebra S R] {n : S} {a : R} :
(n • ⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (n • a)⟩ := by |
show smul r _ _ = _
rw [smul]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import data.nat.part_enat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
#align part_enat PartENat
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
#align part_enat.some PartENat.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_some PartENat.dom_some
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm x y := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add x := Part.ext' (true_and_iff _) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero x := Part.ext' (and_true_iff _) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc x y z := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (true_and_iff _).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.some_eq_coe PartENat.some_eq_natCast
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
#align part_enat.coe_inj PartENat.natCast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_coe PartENat.dom_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Sup PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
#align part_enat.le_def PartENat.le_def
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
#align part_enat.cases_on' PartENat.casesOn'
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
#align part_enat.cases_on PartENat.casesOn
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (false_and_iff _) fun h => h.left.elim
#align part_enat.top_add PartENat.top_add
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
#align part_enat.add_top PartENat.add_top
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
#align part_enat.coe_get PartENat.natCast_get
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_coe' PartENat.get_natCast'
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
#align part_enat.get_coe PartENat.get_natCast
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_add_get PartENat.coe_add_get
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_add PartENat.get_add
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_zero PartENat.get_zero
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_one PartENat.get_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom) :
Part.get (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) h = (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x)) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_some PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_of_dom PartENat.dom_of_le_of_dom
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_some PartENat.dom_of_le_some
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_coe PartENat.dom_of_le_natCast
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by rw [le_def])
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
#align part_enat.decidable_le PartENat.decidableLe
-- Porting note: Removed. Use `Nat.castAddMonoidHom` instead.
#noalign part_enat.coe_hom
#noalign part_enat.coe_coe_hom
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
#align part_enat.lt_def PartENat.lt_def
noncomputable instance orderedAddCommMonoid : OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder, PartENat.addCommMonoid with
add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
#align part_enat.semilattice_sup PartENat.semilatticeSup
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
#align part_enat.order_bot PartENat.orderBot
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
#align part_enat.order_top PartENat.orderTop
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
#align part_enat.coe_le_coe PartENat.coe_le_coe
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
#align part_enat.coe_lt_coe PartENat.coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_le_get PartENat.get_le_get
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
#align part_enat.le_coe_iff PartENat.le_coe_iff
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_iff PartENat.lt_coe_iff
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_le_iff PartENat.coe_le_iff
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_lt_iff PartENat.coe_lt_iff
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
#align part_enat.eq_zero_iff PartENat.eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
#align part_enat.ne_zero_iff PartENat.ne_zero_iff
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
#align part_enat.dom_of_lt PartENat.dom_of_lt
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
#align part_enat.top_eq_none PartENat.top_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
#align part_enat.coe_lt_top PartENat.natCast_lt_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.coe_ne_top PartENat.natCast_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.not_is_max_coe PartENat.not_isMax_natCast
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff PartENat.ne_top_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff_dom PartENat.ne_top_iff_dom
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
#align part_enat.not_dom_iff_eq_top PartENat.not_dom_iff_eq_top
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
#align part_enat.ne_top_of_lt PartENat.ne_top_of_lt
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
#align part_enat.eq_top_iff_forall_lt PartENat.eq_top_iff_forall_lt
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
#align part_enat.eq_top_iff_forall_le PartENat.eq_top_iff_forall_le
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [iff_true_iff, le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
#align part_enat.pos_iff_one_le PartENat.pos_iff_one_le
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
-- Porting note: was `max_def := @sup_eq_maxDefault _ _ (id _) _ }`
max_def := fun a b => by
change (fun a b => a ⊔ b) a b = _
rw [@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (id _) _]
rfl }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
noncomputable instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup, PartENat.orderBot,
PartENat.orderedAddCommMonoid with
le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun a =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
#align part_enat.eq_coe_sub_of_add_eq_coe PartENat.eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· rw [top_add]
-- Porting note: was apply_mod_cast natCast_lt_top
norm_cast; apply natCast_lt_top
norm_cast at h
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h`
norm_cast; apply add_lt_add_right h
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_right PartENat.add_lt_add_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_right PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_left PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
#align part_enat.lt_add_iff_pos_right PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
#align part_enat.lt_add_one PartENat.lt_add_one
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.le_of_lt_add_one PartENat.le_of_lt_add_one
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.succ_le_of_lt; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.add_one_le_of_lt PartENat.add_one_le_of_lt
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply natCast_lt_top
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.lt_of_succ_le; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.add_one_le_iff_lt PartENat.add_one_le_iff_lt
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
#align part_enat.coe_succ_le_succ_iff PartENat.coe_succ_le_iff
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.lt_succ_of_le; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.lt_add_one_iff_lt PartENat.lt_add_one_iff_lt
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_succ_iff_le PartENat.lt_coe_succ_iff_le
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
#align part_enat.add_eq_top_iff PartENat.add_eq_top_iff
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
#align part_enat.add_right_cancel_iff PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
#align part_enat.add_left_cancel_iff PartENat.add_left_cancel_iff
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
#align part_enat.to_with_top PartENat.toWithTop
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_top PartENat.toWithTop_top
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
#align part_enat.to_with_top_top' PartENat.toWithTop_top'
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_zero PartENat.toWithTop_zero
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
#align part_enat.to_with_top_zero' PartENat.toWithTop_zero'
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_some PartENat.toWithTop_some
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by
simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr
#align part_enat.to_with_top_coe PartENat.toWithTop_natCast
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_natCast' (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (n : PartENat) = n := by
rw [toWithTop_natCast n]
#align part_enat.to_with_top_coe' PartENat.toWithTop_natCast'
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] {_ : Decidable (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat)) = OfNat.ofNat n := toWithTop_natCast' n
-- Porting note: statement changed. Mathlib 3 statement was
-- ```
-- @[simp] lemma to_with_top_le {x y : part_enat} :
-- Π [decidable x.dom] [decidable y.dom], by exactI to_with_top x ≤ to_with_top y ↔ x ≤ y :=
-- ```
-- This used to be really slow to typecheck when the definition of `ENat`
-- was still `deriving AddCommMonoidWithOne`. Now that I removed that it is fine.
-- (The problem was that the last `simp` got stuck at `CharZero ℕ∞ ≟ CharZero ℕ∞` where
-- one side used `instENatAddCommMonoidWithOne` and the other used
-- `NonAssocSemiring.toAddCommMonoidWithOne`. Now the former doesn't exist anymore.)
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_le {x y : PartENat} [hx : Decidable x.Dom] [hy : Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x ≤ toWithTop y ↔ x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hy
· simp
induction x using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hx
· simp
· simp -- Porting note: this takes too long.
#align part_enat.to_with_top_le PartENat.toWithTop_le
/-
Porting note: As part of the investigation above, I noticed that Lean4 does not
find the following two instances which it could find in Lean3 automatically:
```
#synth Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom
variable {n : ℕ}
#synth Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom
```
-/
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_lt {x y : PartENat} [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x < toWithTop y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le toWithTop_le
#align part_enat.to_with_top_lt PartENat.toWithTop_lt
end WithTop
-- Porting note: new, extracted from `withTopEquiv`.
/-- Coercion from `ℕ∞` to `PartENat`. -/
@[coe]
def ofENat : ℕ∞ → PartENat :=
fun x => match x with
| Option.none => none
| Option.some n => some n
-- Porting note (#10754): new instance
instance : Coe ℕ∞ PartENat := ⟨ofENat⟩
-- Porting note: new. This could probably be moved to tests or removed.
example (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℕ∞) : PartENat) = ↑n := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_top : ofENat ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_coe (n : ℕ) : ofENat n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_zero : ofENat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_one : ofENat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ofENat (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toWithTop_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop (↑n) = n := by
cases n with
| top => simp
| coe n => simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_toWithTop (x : PartENat) {_ : Decidable (x : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop x = x := by
induction x using PartENat.casesOn <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_le {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x ≤ ofENat y ↔ x ≤ y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_le, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_lt {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x < ofENat y ↔ x < y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_lt, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
section WithTopEquiv
open scoped Classical
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_add {x y : PartENat} : toWithTop (x + y) = toWithTop x + toWithTop y := by
refine PartENat.casesOn y ?_ ?_ <;> refine PartENat.casesOn x ?_ ?_
-- Porting note: was `simp [← Nat.cast_add, ← ENat.coe_add]`
· simp only [add_top, toWithTop_top', _root_.add_top]
· simp only [add_top, toWithTop_top', toWithTop_natCast', _root_.add_top, forall_const]
· simp only [top_add, toWithTop_top', toWithTop_natCast', _root_.top_add, forall_const]
· simp_rw [toWithTop_natCast', ← Nat.cast_add, toWithTop_natCast', forall_const]
#align part_enat.to_with_top_add PartENat.toWithTop_add
/-- `Equiv` between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞` (for the order isomorphism see
`withTopOrderIso`). -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def withTopEquiv : PartENat ≃ ℕ∞ where
toFun x := toWithTop x
invFun x := ↑x
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv PartENat.withTopEquiv
theorem withTopEquiv_top : withTopEquiv ⊤ = ⊤ := by
simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv_top PartENat.withTopEquiv_top
theorem withTopEquiv_natCast (n : Nat) : withTopEquiv n = n := by
simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv_coe PartENat.withTopEquiv_natCast
theorem withTopEquiv_zero : withTopEquiv 0 = 0 := by
simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv_zero PartENat.withTopEquiv_zero
theorem withTopEquiv_one : withTopEquiv 1 = 1 := by
simp
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 767 | 769 | theorem withTopEquiv_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
withTopEquiv (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n := by |
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
#align_import data.pnat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"09597669f02422ed388036273d8848119699c22f"
/-!
# Primality and GCD on pnat
This file extends the theory of `ℕ+` with `gcd`, `lcm` and `Prime` functions, analogous to those on
`Nat`.
-/
namespace Nat.Primes
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- The canonical map from `Nat.Primes` to `ℕ+` -/
@[coe] def toPNat : Nat.Primes → ℕ+ :=
fun p => ⟨(p : ℕ), p.property.pos⟩
instance coePNat : Coe Nat.Primes ℕ+ :=
⟨toPNat⟩
#align nat.primes.coe_pnat Nat.Primes.coePNat
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pnat_nat (p : Nat.Primes) : ((p : ℕ+) : ℕ) = p :=
rfl
#align nat.primes.coe_pnat_nat Nat.Primes.coe_pnat_nat
theorem coe_pnat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) := fun p q h =>
Subtype.ext (by injection h)
#align nat.primes.coe_pnat_injective Nat.Primes.coe_pnat_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pnat_inj (p q : Nat.Primes) : (p : ℕ+) = (q : ℕ+) ↔ p = q :=
coe_pnat_injective.eq_iff
#align nat.primes.coe_pnat_inj Nat.Primes.coe_pnat_inj
end Nat.Primes
namespace PNat
open Nat
/-- The greatest common divisor (gcd) of two positive natural numbers,
viewed as positive natural number. -/
def gcd (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left (m : ℕ) n.pos⟩
#align pnat.gcd PNat.gcd
/-- The least common multiple (lcm) of two positive natural numbers,
viewed as positive natural number. -/
def lcm (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), by
let h := mul_pos n.pos m.pos
rw [← gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), mul_comm] at h
exact pos_of_dvd_of_pos (Dvd.intro (Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ)) rfl) h⟩
#align pnat.lcm PNat.lcm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem gcd_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (gcd n m : ℕ) = Nat.gcd n m :=
rfl
#align pnat.gcd_coe PNat.gcd_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem lcm_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (lcm n m : ℕ) = Nat.lcm n m :=
rfl
#align pnat.lcm_coe PNat.lcm_coe
theorem gcd_dvd_left (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_dvd_left PNat.gcd_dvd_left
theorem gcd_dvd_right (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_dvd_right PNat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem dvd_gcd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : k ∣ m) (hn : k ∣ n) : k ∣ gcd m n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_gcd (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
#align pnat.dvd_gcd PNat.dvd_gcd
theorem dvd_lcm_left (n m : ℕ+) : n ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.dvd_lcm_left PNat.dvd_lcm_left
theorem dvd_lcm_right (n m : ℕ+) : m ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.dvd_lcm_right PNat.dvd_lcm_right
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : m ∣ k) (hn : n ∣ k) : lcm m n ∣ k :=
dvd_iff.2 (@Nat.lcm_dvd (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
#align pnat.lcm_dvd PNat.lcm_dvd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m * lcm n m = n * m :=
Subtype.eq (Nat.gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_mul_lcm PNat.gcd_mul_lcm
theorem eq_one_of_lt_two {n : ℕ+} : n < 2 → n = 1 := by
intro h; apply le_antisymm; swap
· apply PNat.one_le
· exact PNat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h
#align pnat.eq_one_of_lt_two PNat.eq_one_of_lt_two
section Prime
/-! ### Prime numbers -/
/-- Primality predicate for `ℕ+`, defined in terms of `Nat.Prime`. -/
def Prime (p : ℕ+) : Prop :=
(p : ℕ).Prime
#align pnat.prime PNat.Prime
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → 1 < p :=
Nat.Prime.one_lt
#align pnat.prime.one_lt PNat.Prime.one_lt
theorem prime_two : (2 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_two
#align pnat.prime_two PNat.prime_two
instance {p : ℕ+} [h : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime := h
instance fact_prime_two : Fact (2 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_two⟩
theorem prime_three : (3 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_three
instance fact_prime_three : Fact (3 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_three⟩
theorem prime_five : (5 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_five
instance fact_prime_five : Fact (5 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_five⟩
theorem dvd_prime {p m : ℕ+} (pp : p.Prime) : m ∣ p ↔ m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
rw [PNat.dvd_iff]
rw [Nat.dvd_prime pp]
simp
#align pnat.dvd_prime PNat.dvd_prime
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → p ≠ 1 := by
intro pp
intro contra
apply Nat.Prime.ne_one pp
rw [PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
apply contra
#align pnat.prime.ne_one PNat.Prime.ne_one
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬(1 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.not_prime_one
#align pnat.not_prime_one PNat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.not_dvd_one {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → ¬p ∣ 1 := fun pp : p.Prime => by
rw [dvd_iff]
apply Nat.Prime.not_dvd_one pp
#align pnat.prime.not_dvd_one PNat.Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem exists_prime_and_dvd {n : ℕ+} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ∃ p : ℕ+, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := Nat.exists_prime_and_dvd (mt coe_eq_one_iff.mp hn)
exists (⟨p, Nat.Prime.pos hp.left⟩ : ℕ+); rw [dvd_iff]; apply hp
#align pnat.exists_prime_and_dvd PNat.exists_prime_and_dvd
end Prime
section Coprime
/-! ### Coprime numbers and gcd -/
/-- Two pnats are coprime if their gcd is 1. -/
def Coprime (m n : ℕ+) : Prop :=
m.gcd n = 1
#align pnat.coprime PNat.Coprime
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coprime_coe {m n : ℕ+} : Nat.Coprime ↑m ↑n ↔ m.Coprime n := by
unfold Nat.Coprime Coprime
rw [← coe_inj]
simp
#align pnat.coprime_coe PNat.coprime_coe
theorem Coprime.mul {k m n : ℕ+} : m.Coprime k → n.Coprime k → (m * n).Coprime k := by
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
rw [mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.mul
#align pnat.coprime.mul PNat.Coprime.mul
theorem Coprime.mul_right {k m n : ℕ+} : k.Coprime m → k.Coprime n → k.Coprime (m * n) := by
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
rw [mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.mul_right
#align pnat.coprime.mul_right PNat.Coprime.mul_right
theorem gcd_comm {m n : ℕ+} : m.gcd n = n.gcd m := by
apply eq
simp only [gcd_coe]
apply Nat.gcd_comm
#align pnat.gcd_comm PNat.gcd_comm
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ+} : m ∣ n ↔ m.gcd n = m := by
rw [dvd_iff]
rw [Nat.gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd]
rw [← coe_inj]
simp
#align pnat.gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd PNat.gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ+} : m ∣ n ↔ n.gcd m = m := by
rw [gcd_comm]
apply gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
#align pnat.gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd PNat.gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime n → (k * m).gcd n = m.gcd n := by
intro h; apply eq; simp only [gcd_coe, mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel; simpa
#align pnat.coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel PNat.Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime n → (m * k).gcd n = m.gcd n := by rw [mul_comm]; apply Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel
#align pnat.coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel PNat.Coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel_right (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime m → m.gcd (k * n) = m.gcd n := by
intro h; iterate 2 rw [gcd_comm]; symm;
apply Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel _ h
#align pnat.coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel_right PNat.Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel_right
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel_right (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime m → m.gcd (n * k) = m.gcd n := by
rw [mul_comm];
apply Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel_right
#align pnat.coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel_right PNat.Coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem one_gcd {n : ℕ+} : gcd 1 n = 1 := by
rw [← gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd]
apply one_dvd
#align pnat.one_gcd PNat.one_gcd
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Prime.lean | 251 | 253 | theorem gcd_one {n : ℕ+} : gcd n 1 = 1 := by |
rw [gcd_comm]
apply one_gcd
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import data.set.intervals.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder `α`, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open, or
closed) using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side. For instance,
`Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
This file contains these definitions, and basic facts on inclusion, intersection, difference of
intervals (where the precise statements may depend on the properties of the order, in particular
for some statements it should be `LinearOrder` or `DenselyOrdered`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
/-- Left-open right-open interval -/
def Ioo (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ioo Set.Ioo
/-- Left-closed right-open interval -/
def Ico (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ico Set.Ico
/-- Left-infinite right-open interval -/
def Iio (a : α) :=
{ x | x < a }
#align set.Iio Set.Iio
/-- Left-closed right-closed interval -/
def Icc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Icc Set.Icc
/-- Left-infinite right-closed interval -/
def Iic (b : α) :=
{ x | x ≤ b }
#align set.Iic Set.Iic
/-- Left-open right-closed interval -/
def Ioc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Ioc Set.Ioc
/-- Left-closed right-infinite interval -/
def Ici (a : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x }
#align set.Ici Set.Ici
/-- Left-open right-infinite interval -/
def Ioi (a : α) :=
{ x | a < x }
#align set.Ioi Set.Ioi
theorem Ioo_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x < b } = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioo_def Set.Ioo_def
theorem Ico_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b } = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ico_def Set.Ico_def
theorem Iio_def (a : α) : { x | x < a } = Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.Iio_def Set.Iio_def
theorem Icc_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b } = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Icc_def Set.Icc_def
theorem Iic_def (b : α) : { x | x ≤ b } = Iic b :=
rfl
#align set.Iic_def Set.Iic_def
theorem Ioc_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b } = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioc_def Set.Ioc_def
theorem Ici_def (a : α) : { x | a ≤ x } = Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_def Set.Ici_def
theorem Ioi_def (a : α) : { x | a < x } = Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_def Set.Ioi_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioo Set.mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ico Set.mem_Ico
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iio Set.mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Icc Set.mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iic Set.mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioc Set.mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ici Set.mem_Ici
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioi Set.mem_Ioi
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioo Set.decidableMemIoo
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ico Set.decidableMemIco
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iio Set.decidableMemIio
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Icc Set.decidableMemIcc
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iic Set.decidableMemIic
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioc Set.decidableMemIoc
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ici Set.decidableMemIci
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioi Set.decidableMemIoi
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioo Set.left_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Ico Set.left_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Icc Set.left_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioc Set.left_mem_Ioc
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
#align set.left_mem_Ici Set.left_mem_Ici
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioo Set.right_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 209 | 209 | theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by | simp [lt_irrefl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.fin.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
/-!
# Finite intervals in `Fin n`
This file proves that `Fin n` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as Finsets and Fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace Fin
variable {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup : ↑(a ⊔ b) = (a ⊔ b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_sup Fin.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf : ↑(a ⊓ b) = (a ⊓ b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_inf Fin.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max : ↑(max a b) = (max a b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_max Fin.coe_max
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min : ↑(min a b) = (min a b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_min Fin.coe_min
end Fin
open Finset Fin Function
namespace Fin
variable (n : ℕ)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (Fin n) :=
OrderIso.locallyFiniteOrder Fin.orderIsoSubtype
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : LocallyFiniteOrderBot (Fin n) :=
OrderIso.locallyFiniteOrderBot Fin.orderIsoSubtype
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderTop (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
variable {n} (a b : Fin n)
theorem Icc_eq_finset_subtype : Icc a b = (Icc (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Icc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Icc_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ico_eq_finset_subtype : Ico a b = (Ico (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ico_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ico_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_subtype : Ioc a b = (Ioc (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ioc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ioc_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_subtype : Ioo a b = (Ioo (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ioo_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ioo_eq_finset_subtype
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_subtype : uIcc a b = (uIcc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := rfl
#align fin.uIcc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.uIcc_eq_finset_subtype
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Icc : (Icc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Icc ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Icc_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map, Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Icc Fin.map_valEmbedding_Icc
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ico : (Ico a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Ico_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Ico Fin.map_valEmbedding_Ico
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioc : (Ioc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioc ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Ioc_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map, Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Ioc Fin.map_valEmbedding_Ioc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Fin.lean | 94 | 95 | theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioo : (Ioo a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioo ↑a ↑b := by |
simp [Ioo_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Uniform
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Completion
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
/-!
# Inner product space
This file defines inner product spaces and proves the basic properties. We do not formally
define Hilbert spaces, but they can be obtained using the set of assumptions
`[NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [CompleteSpace E]`.
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an inner product. It generalizes the notion of
dot product in `ℝ^n` and provides the means of defining the length of a vector and the angle between
two vectors. In particular vectors `x` and `y` are orthogonal if their inner product equals zero.
We define both the real and complex cases at the same time using the `RCLike` typeclass.
This file proves general results on inner product spaces. For the specific construction of an inner
product structure on `n → 𝕜` for `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`, see `EuclideanSpace` in
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2`.
## Main results
- We define the class `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E` extending `NormedSpace 𝕜 E` with a number of basic
properties, most notably the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Here `𝕜` is understood to be either `ℝ`
or `ℂ`, through the `RCLike` typeclass.
- We show that the inner product is continuous, `continuous_inner`, and bundle it as the
continuous sesquilinear map `innerSL` (see also `innerₛₗ` for the non-continuous version).
- We define `Orthonormal`, a predicate on a function `v : ι → E`, and prove the existence of a
maximal orthonormal set, `exists_maximal_orthonormal`. Bessel's inequality,
`Orthonormal.tsum_inner_products_le`, states that given an orthonormal set `v` and a vector `x`,
the sum of the norm-squares of the inner products `⟪v i, x⟫` is no more than the norm-square of
`x`. For the existence of orthonormal bases, Hilbert bases, etc., see the file
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.projection`.
## Notation
We globally denote the real and complex inner products by `⟪·, ·⟫_ℝ` and `⟪·, ·⟫_ℂ` respectively.
We also provide two notation namespaces: `RealInnerProductSpace`, `ComplexInnerProductSpace`,
which respectively introduce the plain notation `⟪·, ·⟫` for the real and complex inner product.
## Implementation notes
We choose the convention that inner products are conjugate linear in the first argument and linear
in the second.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
## References
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open Topology ComplexConjugate
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
/-- Syntactic typeclass for types endowed with an inner product -/
class Inner (𝕜 E : Type*) where
/-- The inner product function. -/
inner : E → E → 𝕜
#align has_inner Inner
export Inner (inner)
/-- The inner product with values in `𝕜`. -/
notation3:max "⟪" x ", " y "⟫_" 𝕜:max => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
section Notations
/-- The inner product with values in `ℝ`. -/
scoped[RealInnerProductSpace] notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner ℝ _ _ x y
/-- The inner product with values in `ℂ`. -/
scoped[ComplexInnerProductSpace] notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner ℂ _ _ x y
end Notations
/-- An inner product space is a vector space with an additional operation called inner product.
The norm could be derived from the inner product, instead we require the existence of a norm and
the fact that `‖x‖^2 = re ⟪x, x⟫` to be able to put instances on `𝕂` or product
spaces.
To construct a norm from an inner product, see `InnerProductSpace.ofCore`.
-/
class InnerProductSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] extends
NormedSpace 𝕜 E, Inner 𝕜 E where
/-- The inner product induces the norm. -/
norm_sq_eq_inner : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner x x)
/-- The inner product is *hermitian*, taking the `conj` swaps the arguments. -/
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
/-- The inner product is additive in the first coordinate. -/
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
/-- The inner product is conjugate linear in the first coordinate. -/
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space InnerProductSpace
/-!
### Constructing a normed space structure from an inner product
In the definition of an inner product space, we require the existence of a norm, which is equal
(but maybe not defeq) to the square root of the scalar product. This makes it possible to put
an inner product space structure on spaces with a preexisting norm (for instance `ℝ`), with good
properties. However, sometimes, one would like to define the norm starting only from a well-behaved
scalar product. This is what we implement in this paragraph, starting from a structure
`InnerProductSpace.Core` stating that we have a nice scalar product.
Our goal here is not to develop a whole theory with all the supporting API, as this will be done
below for `InnerProductSpace`. Instead, we implement the bare minimum to go as directly as
possible to the construction of the norm and the proof of the triangular inequality.
Warning: Do not use this `Core` structure if the space you are interested in already has a norm
instance defined on it, otherwise this will create a second non-defeq norm instance!
-/
/-- A structure requiring that a scalar product is positive definite and symmetric, from which one
can construct an `InnerProductSpace` instance in `InnerProductSpace.ofCore`. -/
-- @[nolint HasNonemptyInstance] porting note: I don't think we have this linter anymore
structure InnerProductSpace.Core (𝕜 : Type*) (F : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [AddCommGroup F]
[Module 𝕜 F] extends Inner 𝕜 F where
/-- The inner product is *hermitian*, taking the `conj` swaps the arguments. -/
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
/-- The inner product is positive (semi)definite. -/
nonneg_re : ∀ x, 0 ≤ re (inner x x)
/-- The inner product is positive definite. -/
definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0
/-- The inner product is additive in the first coordinate. -/
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
/-- The inner product is conjugate linear in the first coordinate. -/
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space.core InnerProductSpace.Core
/- We set `InnerProductSpace.Core` to be a class as we will use it as such in the construction
of the normed space structure that it produces. However, all the instances we will use will be
local to this proof. -/
attribute [class] InnerProductSpace.Core
/-- Define `InnerProductSpace.Core` from `InnerProductSpace`. Defined to reuse lemmas about
`InnerProductSpace.Core` for `InnerProductSpace`s. Note that the `Norm` instance provided by
`InnerProductSpace.Core.norm` is propositionally but not definitionally equal to the original
norm. -/
def InnerProductSpace.toCore [NormedAddCommGroup E] [c : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E :=
{ c with
nonneg_re := fun x => by
rw [← InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner]
apply sq_nonneg
definite := fun x hx =>
norm_eq_zero.1 <| pow_eq_zero (n := 2) <| by
rw [InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, hx, map_zero] }
#align inner_product_space.to_core InnerProductSpace.toCore
namespace InnerProductSpace.Core
variable [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 F _ x y
local notation "normSqK" => @RCLike.normSq 𝕜 _
local notation "reK" => @RCLike.re 𝕜 _
local notation "ext_iff" => @RCLike.ext_iff 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
/-- Inner product defined by the `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure. We can't reuse
`InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner` because it takes `InnerProductSpace.Core` as an explicit
argument. -/
def toInner' : Inner 𝕜 F :=
c.toInner
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_inner' InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner'
attribute [local instance] toInner'
/-- The norm squared function for `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure. -/
def normSq (x : F) :=
reK ⟪x, x⟫
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq
local notation "normSqF" => @normSq 𝕜 F _ _ _ _
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.conj_symm x y
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_conj_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_conj_symm
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
c.nonneg_re _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_nonneg InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_im (x : F) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]
simp [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_im InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
c.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]; simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_right
theorem ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self (x : F) : (normSqF x : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [ext_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [ofReal_re]; rfl, by simp only [inner_self_im, ofReal_im]⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.coe_norm_sq_eq_inner_self InnerProductSpace.Core.ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : F) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_re_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_re_symm
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : F) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_im_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_im_symm
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.smul_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_left
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left];
simp only [conj_conj, inner_conj_symm, RingHom.map_mul]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_right
theorem inner_zero_left (x : F) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : F), inner_smul_left];
simp only [zero_mul, RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_left
theorem inner_zero_right (x : F) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_right
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨c.definite _, by
rintro rfl
exact inner_zero_left _⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_eq_zero
theorem normSq_eq_zero {x : F} : normSqF x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Iff.trans
(by simp only [normSq, ext_iff, map_zero, inner_self_im, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff])
(@inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ x)
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_ne_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ne_zero
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : F) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
norm_num [ext_iff, inner_self_im]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_re_to_K InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ofReal_re
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_inner_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_symm
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : F) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_neg_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_neg_left
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : F) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_neg_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_neg_right
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left, inner_neg_left]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_left
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right, inner_neg_right]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_right
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : F) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm
/-- Expand `inner (x + y) (x + y)` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_add_self InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_add_self
-- Expand `inner (x - y) (x - y)`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_sub_self InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_sub_self
/-- An auxiliary equality useful to prove the **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**: the square of the norm
of `⟪x, y⟫ • x - ⟪x, x⟫ • y` is equal to `‖x‖ ^ 2 * (‖x‖ ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 - ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ^ 2)`. We use
`InnerProductSpace.ofCore.normSq x` etc (defeq to `is_R_or_C.re ⟪x, x⟫`) instead of `‖x‖ ^ 2`
etc to avoid extra rewrites when applying it to an `InnerProductSpace`. -/
theorem cauchy_schwarz_aux (x y : F) :
normSqF (⟪x, y⟫ • x - ⟪x, x⟫ • y) = normSqF x * (normSqF x * normSqF y - ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self]
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, conj_ofReal, mul_sub, ←
ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self x, ← ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self y]
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, RCLike.conj_mul, mul_left_comm, ← inner_conj_symm y, mul_conj]
push_cast
ring
#align inner_product_space.core.cauchy_schwarz_aux InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**.
We need this for the `Core` structure to prove the triangle inequality below when
showing the core is a normed group.
-/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simpa only [inner_zero_left, map_zero, zero_mul, norm_zero] using le_rfl
· have hx' : 0 < normSqF x := inner_self_nonneg.lt_of_ne' (mt normSq_eq_zero.1 hx)
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hx', ← normSq, ← normSq,
norm_inner_symm y, ← sq, ← cauchy_schwarz_aux]
exact inner_self_nonneg
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_mul_inner_self_le InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le
/-- Norm constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure, defined to be the square root
of the scalar product. -/
def toNorm : Norm F where norm x := √(re ⟪x, x⟫)
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.toNorm
attribute [local instance] toNorm
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := rfl
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_eq_sqrt_inner InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_eq_sqrt_inner
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫), sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm (x : F) : √(normSqF x) = ‖x‖ := rfl
#align inner_product_space.core.sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.sqrt_normSq_eq_norm
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (mul_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) <|
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [norm_inner_symm]
_ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ := inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_inner_le_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm
/-- Normed group structure constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure -/
def toNormedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup F :=
AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := fun x => √(re ⟪x, x⟫)
map_zero' := by simp only [sqrt_zero, inner_zero_right, map_zero]
neg' := fun x => by simp only [inner_neg_left, neg_neg, inner_neg_right]
add_le' := fun x y => by
have h₁ : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := norm_inner_le_norm _ _
have h₂ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ := re_le_norm _
have h₃ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := h₂.trans h₁
have h₄ : re ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
have : ‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ ≤ (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) * (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, inner_add_add_self, mul_add, mul_comm, map_add]
linarith
exact nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (add_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) this
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun x hx =>
normSq_eq_zero.1 <| (sqrt_eq_zero inner_self_nonneg).1 hx }
#align inner_product_space.core.to_normed_add_comm_group InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup
attribute [local instance] toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Normed space structure constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure -/
def toNormedSpace : NormedSpace 𝕜 F where
norm_smul_le r x := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, ← mul_assoc]
rw [RCLike.conj_mul, ← ofReal_pow, re_ofReal_mul, sqrt_mul, ← ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self,
ofReal_re]
· simp [sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, RCLike.sqrt_normSq_eq_norm]
· positivity
#align inner_product_space.core.to_normed_space InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedSpace
end InnerProductSpace.Core
section
attribute [local instance] InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Given an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure on a space, one can use it to turn
the space into an inner product space. The `NormedAddCommGroup` structure is expected
to already be defined with `InnerProductSpace.ofCore.toNormedAddCommGroup`. -/
def InnerProductSpace.ofCore [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] (c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F) :
InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F :=
letI : NormedSpace 𝕜 F := @InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedSpace 𝕜 F _ _ _ c
{ c with
norm_sq_eq_inner := fun x => by
have h₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 = √(re (c.inner x x)) ^ 2 := rfl
have h₂ : 0 ≤ re (c.inner x x) := InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
simp [h₁, sq_sqrt, h₂] }
#align inner_product_space.of_core InnerProductSpace.ofCore
end
/-! ### Properties of inner product spaces -/
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_inner)
section BasicProperties
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_symm _ _
#align inner_conj_symm inner_conj_symm
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
#align real_inner_comm real_inner_comm
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
#align inner_eq_zero_symm inner_eq_zero_symm
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
#align inner_self_im inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_add_left inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_add_right inner_add_right
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align inner_re_symm inner_re_symm
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
#align inner_im_symm inner_im_symm
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.smul_left _ _ _
#align inner_smul_left inner_smul_left
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
#align real_inner_smul_left real_inner_smul_left
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
#align inner_smul_real_left inner_smul_real_left
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_mul, conj_conj, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_smul_right inner_smul_right
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
#align real_inner_smul_right real_inner_smul_right
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
#align inner_smul_real_right inner_smul_real_right
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
#align sesq_form_of_inner sesqFormOfInner
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
#align bilin_form_of_real_inner bilinFormOfRealInner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
#align sum_inner sum_inner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
#align inner_sum inner_sum
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert _root_.sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align finsupp.sum_inner Finsupp.sum_inner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert _root_.inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align finsupp.inner_sum Finsupp.inner_sum
theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [DFinsupp.sum, _root_.sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
#align dfinsupp.sum_inner DFinsupp.sum_inner
theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [DFinsupp.sum, _root_.inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align dfinsupp.inner_sum DFinsupp.inner_sum
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
#align inner_zero_left inner_zero_left
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
#align inner_re_zero_left inner_re_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_zero_right inner_zero_right
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
#align inner_re_zero_right inner_re_zero_right
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.toCore.nonneg_re x
#align inner_self_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
#align real_inner_self_nonneg real_inner_self_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_re_to_K inner_self_ofReal_re
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_inner, ofReal_pow]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
#align inner_self_re_eq_norm inner_self_re_eq_norm
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_norm_to_K inner_self_ofReal_norm
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
#align real_inner_self_abs real_inner_self_abs
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
#align inner_self_eq_zero inner_self_eq_zero
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
#align inner_self_ne_zero inner_self_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
#align inner_self_nonpos inner_self_nonpos
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
@inner_self_nonpos ℝ F _ _ _ x
#align real_inner_self_nonpos real_inner_self_nonpos
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
#align norm_inner_symm norm_inner_symm
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
#align inner_neg_left inner_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_neg_right inner_neg_right
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
#align inner_neg_neg inner_neg_neg
-- Porting note: removed `simp` because it can prove it using `inner_conj_symm`
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
#align inner_self_conj inner_self_conj
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
#align inner_sub_left inner_sub_left
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
#align inner_sub_right inner_sub_right
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
#align inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
#align inner_add_add_self inner_add_add_self
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
#align real_inner_add_add_self real_inner_add_add_self
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
#align inner_sub_sub_self inner_sub_sub_self
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
#align real_inner_sub_sub_self real_inner_sub_sub_self
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
#align ext_inner_left ext_inner_left
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
#align ext_inner_right ext_inner_right
variable {𝕜}
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
#align parallelogram_law parallelogram_law
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
#align inner_mul_inner_self_le inner_mul_inner_self_le
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
#align real_inner_mul_inner_self_le real_inner_mul_inner_self_le
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (β := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
#align linear_independent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero
end BasicProperties
section OrthonormalSets
variable {ι : Type*} (𝕜)
/-- An orthonormal set of vectors in an `InnerProductSpace` -/
def Orthonormal (v : ι → E) : Prop :=
(∀ i, ‖v i‖ = 1) ∧ Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0
#align orthonormal Orthonormal
variable {𝕜}
/-- `if ... then ... else` characterization of an indexed set of vectors being orthonormal. (Inner
product equals Kronecker delta.) -/
theorem orthonormal_iff_ite [DecidableEq ι] {v : ι → E} :
Orthonormal 𝕜 v ↔ ∀ i j, ⟪v i, v j⟫ = if i = j then (1 : 𝕜) else (0 : 𝕜) := by
constructor
· intro hv i j
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, hv.1]
· exact hv.2 h
· intro h
constructor
· intro i
have h' : ‖v i‖ ^ 2 = 1 ^ 2 := by simp [@norm_sq_eq_inner 𝕜, h i i]
have h₁ : 0 ≤ ‖v i‖ := norm_nonneg _
have h₂ : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 := zero_le_one
rwa [sq_eq_sq h₁ h₂] at h'
· intro i j hij
simpa [hij] using h i j
#align orthonormal_iff_ite orthonormal_iff_ite
/-- `if ... then ... else` characterization of a set of vectors being orthonormal. (Inner product
equals Kronecker delta.) -/
theorem orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite [DecidableEq E] {s : Set E} :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : s → E) ↔ ∀ v ∈ s, ∀ w ∈ s, ⟪v, w⟫ = if v = w then 1 else 0 := by
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite]
constructor
· intro h v hv w hw
convert h ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ using 1
simp
· rintro h ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
convert h v hv w hw using 1
simp
#align orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_right_finsupp {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (i : ι) :
⟪v i, Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l⟫ = l i := by
classical
simpa [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.inner_sum, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv] using Eq.symm
#align orthonormal.inner_right_finsupp Orthonormal.inner_right_finsupp
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_right_sum {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜) {s : Finset ι}
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) : ⟪v i, ∑ i ∈ s, l i • v i⟫ = l i := by
classical
simp [inner_sum, inner_smul_right, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv, hi]
#align orthonormal.inner_right_sum Orthonormal.inner_right_sum
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_right_fintype [Fintype ι] {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜)
(i : ι) : ⟪v i, ∑ i : ι, l i • v i⟫ = l i :=
hv.inner_right_sum l (Finset.mem_univ _)
#align orthonormal.inner_right_fintype Orthonormal.inner_right_fintype
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_left_finsupp {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (i : ι) :
⟪Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l, v i⟫ = conj (l i) := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, hv.inner_right_finsupp]
#align orthonormal.inner_left_finsupp Orthonormal.inner_left_finsupp
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_left_sum {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜) {s : Finset ι}
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) : ⟪∑ i ∈ s, l i • v i, v i⟫ = conj (l i) := by
classical
simp only [sum_inner, inner_smul_left, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv, hi, mul_boole,
Finset.sum_ite_eq', if_true]
#align orthonormal.inner_left_sum Orthonormal.inner_left_sum
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_left_fintype [Fintype ι] {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜)
(i : ι) : ⟪∑ i : ι, l i • v i, v i⟫ = conj (l i) :=
hv.inner_left_sum l (Finset.mem_univ _)
#align orthonormal.inner_left_fintype Orthonormal.inner_left_fintype
/-- The inner product of two linear combinations of a set of orthonormal vectors, expressed as
a sum over the first `Finsupp`. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l₁ l₂ : ι →₀ 𝕜) :
⟪Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l₁, Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l₂⟫ = l₁.sum fun i y => conj y * l₂ i := by
simp only [l₁.total_apply _, Finsupp.sum_inner, hv.inner_right_finsupp, smul_eq_mul]
#align orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left
/-- The inner product of two linear combinations of a set of orthonormal vectors, expressed as
a sum over the second `Finsupp`. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_right {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l₁ l₂ : ι →₀ 𝕜) :
⟪Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l₁, Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l₂⟫ = l₂.sum fun i y => conj (l₁ i) * y := by
simp only [l₂.total_apply _, Finsupp.inner_sum, hv.inner_left_finsupp, mul_comm, smul_eq_mul]
#align orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_right Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_right
/-- The inner product of two linear combinations of a set of orthonormal vectors, expressed as
a sum. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_sum {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l₁ l₂ : ι → 𝕜) (s : Finset ι) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, l₁ i • v i, ∑ i ∈ s, l₂ i • v i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, conj (l₁ i) * l₂ i := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_smul_left]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hv.inner_right_sum l₂ hi]
#align orthonormal.inner_sum Orthonormal.inner_sum
/--
The double sum of weighted inner products of pairs of vectors from an orthonormal sequence is the
sum of the weights.
-/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_left_right_finset {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
{a : ι → ι → 𝕜} : (∑ i ∈ s, ∑ j ∈ s, a i j • ⟪v j, v i⟫) = ∑ k ∈ s, a k k := by
classical
simp [orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv, Finset.sum_ite_of_true]
#align orthonormal.inner_left_right_finset Orthonormal.inner_left_right_finset
/-- An orthonormal set is linearly independent. -/
theorem Orthonormal.linearIndependent {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff]
intro l hl
ext i
have key : ⟪v i, Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l⟫ = ⟪v i, 0⟫ := by rw [hl]
simpa only [hv.inner_right_finsupp, inner_zero_right] using key
#align orthonormal.linear_independent Orthonormal.linearIndependent
/-- A subfamily of an orthonormal family (i.e., a composition with an injective map) is an
orthonormal family. -/
theorem Orthonormal.comp {ι' : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (f : ι' → ι)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : Orthonormal 𝕜 (v ∘ f) := by
classical
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite] at hv ⊢
intro i j
convert hv (f i) (f j) using 1
simp [hf.eq_iff]
#align orthonormal.comp Orthonormal.comp
/-- An injective family `v : ι → E` is orthonormal if and only if `Subtype.val : (range v) → E` is
orthonormal. -/
theorem orthonormal_subtype_range {v : ι → E} (hv : Function.Injective v) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : Set.range v → E) ↔ Orthonormal 𝕜 v := by
let f : ι ≃ Set.range v := Equiv.ofInjective v hv
refine ⟨fun h => h.comp f f.injective, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [← Equiv.self_comp_ofInjective_symm hv]
exact h.comp f.symm f.symm.injective
#align orthonormal_subtype_range orthonormal_subtype_range
/-- If `v : ι → E` is an orthonormal family, then `Subtype.val : (range v) → E` is an orthonormal
family. -/
theorem Orthonormal.toSubtypeRange {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : Set.range v → E) :=
(orthonormal_subtype_range hv.linearIndependent.injective).2 hv
#align orthonormal.to_subtype_range Orthonormal.toSubtypeRange
/-- A linear combination of some subset of an orthonormal set is orthogonal to other members of the
set. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_zero {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {s : Set ι} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∉ s) {l : ι →₀ 𝕜} (hl : l ∈ Finsupp.supported 𝕜 𝕜 s) :
⟪Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l, v i⟫ = 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_supported'] at hl
simp only [hv.inner_left_finsupp, hl i hi, map_zero]
#align orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_zero Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_zero
/-- Given an orthonormal family, a second family of vectors is orthonormal if every vector equals
the corresponding vector in the original family or its negation. -/
theorem Orthonormal.orthonormal_of_forall_eq_or_eq_neg {v w : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(hw : ∀ i, w i = v i ∨ w i = -v i) : Orthonormal 𝕜 w := by
classical
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite] at *
intro i j
cases' hw i with hi hi <;> cases' hw j with hj hj <;>
replace hv := hv i j <;> split_ifs at hv ⊢ with h <;>
simpa only [hi, hj, h, inner_neg_right, inner_neg_left, neg_neg, eq_self_iff_true,
neg_eq_zero] using hv
#align orthonormal.orthonormal_of_forall_eq_or_eq_neg Orthonormal.orthonormal_of_forall_eq_or_eq_neg
/- The material that follows, culminating in the existence of a maximal orthonormal subset, is
adapted from the corresponding development of the theory of linearly independents sets. See
`exists_linearIndependent` in particular. -/
variable (𝕜 E)
theorem orthonormal_empty : Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : (∅ : Set E) → E) := by
classical
simp [orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite]
#align orthonormal_empty orthonormal_empty
variable {𝕜 E}
theorem orthonormal_iUnion_of_directed {η : Type*} {s : η → Set E} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
(h : ∀ i, Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : s i → E)) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : (⋃ i, s i) → E) := by
classical
rw [orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite]
rintro x ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hxi⟩ y ⟨_, ⟨j, rfl⟩, hyj⟩
obtain ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := hs i j
have h_orth : Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : s k → E) := h k
rw [orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite] at h_orth
exact h_orth x (hik hxi) y (hjk hyj)
#align orthonormal_Union_of_directed orthonormal_iUnion_of_directed
theorem orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed {s : Set (Set E)} (hs : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) s)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => ((x : a) : E))) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : ⋃₀ s → E) := by
rw [Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion]; exact orthonormal_iUnion_of_directed hs.directed_val (by simpa using h)
#align orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed
/-- Given an orthonormal set `v` of vectors in `E`, there exists a maximal orthonormal set
containing it. -/
theorem exists_maximal_orthonormal {s : Set E} (hs : Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : s → E)) :
∃ w ⊇ s, Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : w → E) ∧
∀ u ⊇ w, Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : u → E) → u = w := by
have := zorn_subset_nonempty { b | Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : b → E) } ?_ _ hs
· obtain ⟨b, bi, sb, h⟩ := this
refine ⟨b, sb, bi, ?_⟩
exact fun u hus hu => h u hu hus
· refine fun c hc cc _c0 => ⟨⋃₀ c, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed cc.directedOn fun x xc => hc xc
· exact fun _ => Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
#align exists_maximal_orthonormal exists_maximal_orthonormal
theorem Orthonormal.ne_zero {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (i : ι) : v i ≠ 0 := by
have : ‖v i‖ ≠ 0 := by
rw [hv.1 i]
norm_num
simpa using this
#align orthonormal.ne_zero Orthonormal.ne_zero
open FiniteDimensional
/-- A family of orthonormal vectors with the correct cardinality forms a basis. -/
def basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank [Fintype ι] [Nonempty ι] {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(card_eq : Fintype.card ι = finrank 𝕜 E) : Basis ι 𝕜 E :=
basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank hv.linearIndependent card_eq
#align basis_of_orthonormal_of_card_eq_finrank basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank
@[simp]
theorem coe_basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank [Fintype ι] [Nonempty ι] {v : ι → E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (card_eq : Fintype.card ι = finrank 𝕜 E) :
(basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank hv card_eq : ι → E) = v :=
coe_basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank _ _
#align coe_basis_of_orthonormal_of_card_eq_finrank coe_basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank
end OrthonormalSets
section Norm
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_inner _)
#align norm_eq_sqrt_inner norm_eq_sqrt_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
#align norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
#align inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
#align inner_self_eq_norm_sq inner_self_eq_norm_sq
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
#align real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
#align real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq
-- Porting note: this was present in mathlib3 but seemingly didn't do anything.
-- variable (𝕜)
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align norm_add_sq norm_add_sq
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
#align norm_add_pow_two norm_add_pow_two
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
#align norm_add_sq_real norm_add_sq_real
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
#align norm_add_pow_two_real norm_add_pow_two_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
#align norm_add_mul_self norm_add_mul_self
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
#align norm_add_mul_self_real norm_add_mul_self_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
#align norm_sub_sq norm_sub_sq
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
#align norm_sub_pow_two norm_sub_pow_two
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align norm_sub_sq_real norm_sub_sq_real
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
#align norm_sub_pow_two_real norm_sub_pow_two_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
#align norm_sub_mul_self norm_sub_mul_self
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
#align norm_sub_mul_self_real norm_sub_mul_self_real
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
#align norm_inner_le_norm norm_inner_le_norm
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
#align nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
#align re_inner_le_norm re_inner_le_norm
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
#align abs_real_inner_le_norm abs_real_inner_le_norm
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
#align real_inner_le_norm real_inner_le_norm
variable (𝕜)
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
#align parallelogram_law_with_norm parallelogram_law_with_norm
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
#align parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
#align re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
#align re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
#align re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align im_inner_eq_norm_sub_I_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_I_smul_mul_self_div_four im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
#align inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx
have hy' : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
#align dist_div_norm_sq_smul dist_div_norm_sq_smul
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InnerProductSpace.toUniformConvexSpace : UniformConvexSpace F :=
⟨fun ε hε => by
refine
⟨2 - √(4 - ε ^ 2), sub_pos_of_lt <| (sqrt_lt' zero_lt_two).2 ?_, fun x hx y hy hxy => ?_⟩
· norm_num
exact pow_pos hε _
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
refine le_sqrt_of_sq_le ?_
rw [sq, eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 (parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ x y), ← sq ‖x - y‖, hx, hy]
ring_nf
exact sub_le_sub_left (pow_le_pow_left hε.le hxy _) 4⟩
#align inner_product_space.to_uniform_convex_space InnerProductSpace.toUniformConvexSpace
section Complex
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℂ V]
/-- A complex polarization identity, with a linear map
-/
theorem inner_map_polarization (T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) (x y : V) :
⟪T y, x⟫_ℂ =
(⟪T (x + y), x + y⟫_ℂ - ⟪T (x - y), x - y⟫_ℂ +
Complex.I * ⟪T (x + Complex.I • y), x + Complex.I • y⟫_ℂ -
Complex.I * ⟪T (x - Complex.I • y), x - Complex.I • y⟫_ℂ) /
4 := by
simp only [map_add, map_sub, inner_add_left, inner_add_right, LinearMap.map_smul, inner_smul_left,
inner_smul_right, Complex.conj_I, ← pow_two, Complex.I_sq, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right,
mul_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_neg, neg_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, one_mul, neg_one_mul, mul_sub, sub_sub]
ring
#align inner_map_polarization inner_map_polarization
theorem inner_map_polarization' (T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) (x y : V) :
⟪T x, y⟫_ℂ =
(⟪T (x + y), x + y⟫_ℂ - ⟪T (x - y), x - y⟫_ℂ -
Complex.I * ⟪T (x + Complex.I • y), x + Complex.I • y⟫_ℂ +
Complex.I * ⟪T (x - Complex.I • y), x - Complex.I • y⟫_ℂ) /
4 := by
simp only [map_add, map_sub, inner_add_left, inner_add_right, LinearMap.map_smul, inner_smul_left,
inner_smul_right, Complex.conj_I, ← pow_two, Complex.I_sq, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right,
mul_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_neg, neg_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, one_mul, neg_one_mul, mul_sub, sub_sub]
ring
#align inner_map_polarization' inner_map_polarization'
/-- A linear map `T` is zero, if and only if the identity `⟪T x, x⟫_ℂ = 0` holds for all `x`.
-/
theorem inner_map_self_eq_zero (T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) : (∀ x : V, ⟪T x, x⟫_ℂ = 0) ↔ T = 0 := by
constructor
· intro hT
ext x
rw [LinearMap.zero_apply, ← @inner_self_eq_zero ℂ V, inner_map_polarization]
simp only [hT]
norm_num
· rintro rfl x
simp only [LinearMap.zero_apply, inner_zero_left]
#align inner_map_self_eq_zero inner_map_self_eq_zero
/--
Two linear maps `S` and `T` are equal, if and only if the identity `⟪S x, x⟫_ℂ = ⟪T x, x⟫_ℂ` holds
for all `x`.
-/
theorem ext_inner_map (S T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) : (∀ x : V, ⟪S x, x⟫_ℂ = ⟪T x, x⟫_ℂ) ↔ S = T := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← inner_map_self_eq_zero]
refine forall_congr' fun x => ?_
rw [LinearMap.sub_apply, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero]
#align ext_inner_map ext_inner_map
end Complex
section
variable {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} {ι'' : Type*}
variable {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E']
variable {E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'']
/-- A linear isometry preserves the inner product. -/
@[simp]
theorem LinearIsometry.inner_map_map (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (x y : E) : ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
simp [inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four, ← f.norm_map]
#align linear_isometry.inner_map_map LinearIsometry.inner_map_map
/-- A linear isometric equivalence preserves the inner product. -/
@[simp]
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_map (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (x y : E) : ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
f.toLinearIsometry.inner_map_map x y
#align linear_isometry_equiv.inner_map_map LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_map
/-- The adjoint of a linear isometric equivalence is its inverse. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_eq_flip (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (x : E) (y : E') :
⟪f x, y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, f.symm y⟫_𝕜 := by
conv_lhs => rw [← f.apply_symm_apply y, f.inner_map_map]
/-- A linear map that preserves the inner product is a linear isometry. -/
def LinearMap.isometryOfInner (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h : ∀ x y, ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫) : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
⟨f, fun x => by simp only [@norm_eq_sqrt_inner 𝕜, h]⟩
#align linear_map.isometry_of_inner LinearMap.isometryOfInner
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.coe_isometryOfInner (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) : ⇑(f.isometryOfInner h) = f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.coe_isometry_of_inner LinearMap.coe_isometryOfInner
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.isometryOfInner_toLinearMap (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) :
(f.isometryOfInner h).toLinearMap = f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.isometry_of_inner_to_linear_map LinearMap.isometryOfInner_toLinearMap
/-- A linear equivalence that preserves the inner product is a linear isometric equivalence. -/
def LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h : ∀ x y, ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫) : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
⟨f, ((f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E').isometryOfInner h).norm_map⟩
#align linear_equiv.isometry_of_inner LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.coe_isometryOfInner (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) : ⇑(f.isometryOfInner h) = f :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.coe_isometry_of_inner LinearEquiv.coe_isometryOfInner
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner_toLinearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) :
(f.isometryOfInner h).toLinearEquiv = f :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.isometry_of_inner_to_linear_equiv LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner_toLinearEquiv
/-- A linear map is an isometry if and it preserves the inner product. -/
theorem LinearMap.norm_map_iff_inner_map_map {F : Type*} [FunLike F E E'] [LinearMapClass F 𝕜 E E']
(f : F) : (∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖) ↔ (∀ x y, ⟪f x, f y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜) :=
⟨({ toLinearMap := LinearMapClass.linearMap f, norm_map' := · : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' }.inner_map_map),
(LinearMapClass.linearMap f |>.isometryOfInner · |>.norm_map)⟩
/-- A linear isometry preserves the property of being orthonormal. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.orthonormal_comp_iff {v : ι → E} (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v) ↔ Orthonormal 𝕜 v := by
classical simp_rw [orthonormal_iff_ite, Function.comp_apply, LinearIsometry.inner_map_map]
#align linear_isometry.orthonormal_comp_iff LinearIsometry.orthonormal_comp_iff
/-- A linear isometry preserves the property of being orthonormal. -/
theorem Orthonormal.comp_linearIsometry {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v) := by rwa [f.orthonormal_comp_iff]
#align orthonormal.comp_linear_isometry Orthonormal.comp_linearIsometry
/-- A linear isometric equivalence preserves the property of being orthonormal. -/
theorem Orthonormal.comp_linearIsometryEquiv {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v) :=
hv.comp_linearIsometry f.toLinearIsometry
#align orthonormal.comp_linear_isometry_equiv Orthonormal.comp_linearIsometryEquiv
/-- A linear isometric equivalence, applied with `Basis.map`, preserves the property of being
orthonormal. -/
theorem Orthonormal.mapLinearIsometryEquiv {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') : Orthonormal 𝕜 (v.map f.toLinearEquiv) :=
hv.comp_linearIsometryEquiv f
#align orthonormal.map_linear_isometry_equiv Orthonormal.mapLinearIsometryEquiv
/-- A linear map that sends an orthonormal basis to orthonormal vectors is a linear isometry. -/
def LinearMap.isometryOfOrthonormal (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
f.isometryOfInner fun x y => by
classical rw [← v.total_repr x, ← v.total_repr y, Finsupp.apply_total, Finsupp.apply_total,
hv.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left, hf.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left]
#align linear_map.isometry_of_orthonormal LinearMap.isometryOfOrthonormal
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.coe_isometryOfOrthonormal (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) : ⇑(f.isometryOfOrthonormal hv hf) = f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.coe_isometry_of_orthonormal LinearMap.coe_isometryOfOrthonormal
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.isometryOfOrthonormal_toLinearMap (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) :
(f.isometryOfOrthonormal hv hf).toLinearMap = f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.isometry_of_orthonormal_to_linear_map LinearMap.isometryOfOrthonormal_toLinearMap
/-- A linear equivalence that sends an orthonormal basis to orthonormal vectors is a linear
isometric equivalence. -/
def LinearEquiv.isometryOfOrthonormal (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
f.isometryOfInner fun x y => by
rw [← LinearEquiv.coe_coe] at hf
classical rw [← v.total_repr x, ← v.total_repr y, ← LinearEquiv.coe_coe f, Finsupp.apply_total,
Finsupp.apply_total, hv.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left, hf.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left]
#align linear_equiv.isometry_of_orthonormal LinearEquiv.isometryOfOrthonormal
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.coe_isometryOfOrthonormal (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) : ⇑(f.isometryOfOrthonormal hv hf) = f :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.coe_isometry_of_orthonormal LinearEquiv.coe_isometryOfOrthonormal
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.isometryOfOrthonormal_toLinearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) :
(f.isometryOfOrthonormal hv hf).toLinearEquiv = f :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.isometry_of_orthonormal_to_linear_equiv LinearEquiv.isometryOfOrthonormal_toLinearEquiv
/-- A linear isometric equivalence that sends an orthonormal basis to a given orthonormal basis. -/
def Orthonormal.equiv {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'}
(hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
(v.equiv v' e).isometryOfOrthonormal hv
(by
have h : v.equiv v' e ∘ v = v' ∘ e := by
ext i
simp
rw [h]
classical exact hv'.comp _ e.injective)
#align orthonormal.equiv Orthonormal.equiv
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_toLinearEquiv {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
{v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'} (hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(hv.equiv hv' e).toLinearEquiv = v.equiv v' e :=
rfl
#align orthonormal.equiv_to_linear_equiv Orthonormal.equiv_toLinearEquiv
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_apply {ι' : Type*} {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
{v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'} (hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') (i : ι) :
hv.equiv hv' e (v i) = v' (e i) :=
Basis.equiv_apply _ _ _ _
#align orthonormal.equiv_apply Orthonormal.equiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_refl {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
hv.equiv hv (Equiv.refl ι) = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl 𝕜 E :=
v.ext_linearIsometryEquiv fun i => by
simp only [Orthonormal.equiv_apply, Equiv.coe_refl, id, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_refl]
#align orthonormal.equiv_refl Orthonormal.equiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_symm {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'}
(hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') : (hv.equiv hv' e).symm = hv'.equiv hv e.symm :=
v'.ext_linearIsometryEquiv fun i =>
(hv.equiv hv' e).injective <| by
simp only [LinearIsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Orthonormal.equiv_apply, e.apply_symm_apply]
#align orthonormal.equiv_symm Orthonormal.equiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_trans {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'}
(hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') {v'' : Basis ι'' 𝕜 E''} (hv'' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v'')
(e' : ι' ≃ ι'') : (hv.equiv hv' e).trans (hv'.equiv hv'' e') = hv.equiv hv'' (e.trans e') :=
v.ext_linearIsometryEquiv fun i => by
simp only [LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, Orthonormal.equiv_apply, e.coe_trans,
Function.comp_apply]
#align orthonormal.equiv_trans Orthonormal.equiv_trans
theorem Orthonormal.map_equiv {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'}
(hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') :
v.map (hv.equiv hv' e).toLinearEquiv = v'.reindex e.symm :=
v.map_equiv _ _
#align orthonormal.map_equiv Orthonormal.map_equiv
end
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
#align real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
#align real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_right_eq_self, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
#align norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm,
sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)) (norm_nonneg _)]
#align norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_right_eq_self, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
#align norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
#align norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_right_eq_self, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
#align norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm,
sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)) (norm_nonneg _)]
#align norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
#align norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
#align real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
#align norm_sub_eq_norm_add norm_sub_eq_norm_add
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
#align abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
#align real_inner_smul_self_left real_inner_smul_self_left
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
#align real_inner_smul_self_right real_inner_smul_self_right
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
#align norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
#align abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
#align real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
#align real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2
· refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux, InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3
· exact fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1
· rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4; · simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
#align norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
#align norm_inner_eq_norm_iff norm_inner_eq_norm_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
#align norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
#align abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
#align inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
#align inner_eq_norm_mul_iff inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
#align inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
#align real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
#align real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
#align inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
#align inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
#align inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
#align inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero
variable (𝕜)
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear map. -/
def innerₛₗ : E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ _ _ (fun v w => ⟪v, w⟫) inner_add_left (fun _ _ _ => inner_smul_left _ _ _)
inner_add_right fun _ _ _ => inner_smul_right _ _ _
#align innerₛₗ innerₛₗ
@[simp]
theorem innerₛₗ_apply_coe (v : E) : ⇑(innerₛₗ 𝕜 v) = fun w => ⟪v, w⟫ :=
rfl
#align innerₛₗ_apply_coe innerₛₗ_apply_coe
@[simp]
theorem innerₛₗ_apply (v w : E) : innerₛₗ 𝕜 v w = ⟪v, w⟫ :=
rfl
#align innerₛₗ_apply innerₛₗ_apply
variable (F)
/-- The inner product as a bilinear map in the real case. -/
def innerₗ : F →ₗ[ℝ] F →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := innerₛₗ ℝ
@[simp] lemma flip_innerₗ : (innerₗ F).flip = innerₗ F := by
ext v w
exact real_inner_comm v w
variable {F}
@[simp] lemma innerₗ_apply (v w : F) : innerₗ F v w = ⟪v, w⟫_ℝ := rfl
/-- The inner product as a continuous sesquilinear map. Note that `toDualMap` (resp. `toDual`)
in `InnerProductSpace.Dual` is a version of this given as a linear isometry (resp. linear
isometric equivalence). -/
def innerSL : E →L⋆[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂ (innerₛₗ 𝕜) 1 fun x y => by
simp only [norm_inner_le_norm, one_mul, innerₛₗ_apply]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align innerSL innerSL
@[simp]
theorem innerSL_apply_coe (v : E) : ⇑(innerSL 𝕜 v) = fun w => ⟪v, w⟫ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align innerSL_apply_coe innerSL_apply_coe
@[simp]
theorem innerSL_apply (v w : E) : innerSL 𝕜 v w = ⟪v, w⟫ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align innerSL_apply innerSL_apply
/-- `innerSL` is an isometry. Note that the associated `LinearIsometry` is defined in
`InnerProductSpace.Dual` as `toDualMap`. -/
@[simp]
theorem innerSL_apply_norm (x : E) : ‖innerSL 𝕜 x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
refine
le_antisymm ((innerSL 𝕜 x).opNorm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) fun y => norm_inner_le_norm _ _) ?_
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h)
· simp
· refine (mul_le_mul_right (norm_pos_iff.2 h)).mp ?_
calc
‖x‖ * ‖x‖ = ‖(⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)‖ := by
rw [← sq, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, norm_pow, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
_ ≤ ‖innerSL 𝕜 x‖ * ‖x‖ := (innerSL 𝕜 x).le_opNorm _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align innerSL_apply_norm innerSL_apply_norm
lemma norm_innerSL_le : ‖innerSL 𝕜 (E := E)‖ ≤ 1 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one (by simp)
/-- The inner product as a continuous sesquilinear map, with the two arguments flipped. -/
def innerSLFlip : E →L[𝕜] E →L⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
@ContinuousLinearMap.flipₗᵢ' 𝕜 𝕜 𝕜 E E 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜) _ _
(innerSL 𝕜)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align innerSL_flip innerSLFlip
@[simp]
theorem innerSLFlip_apply (x y : E) : innerSLFlip 𝕜 x y = ⟪y, x⟫ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align innerSL_flip_apply innerSLFlip_apply
variable (F) in
@[simp] lemma innerSL_real_flip : (innerSL ℝ (E := F)).flip = innerSL ℝ := by
ext v w
exact real_inner_comm _ _
variable {𝕜}
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E']
-- Note: odd and expensive build behavior is explicitly turned off using `noncomputable`
/-- Given `f : E →L[𝕜] E'`, construct the continuous sesquilinear form `fun x y ↦ ⟪x, A y⟫`, given
as a continuous linear map. -/
noncomputable def toSesqForm : (E →L[𝕜] E') →L[𝕜] E' →L⋆[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.flipₗᵢ' E E' 𝕜 (starRingEnd 𝕜) (RingHom.id 𝕜)).toContinuousLinearEquiv ∘L
ContinuousLinearMap.compSL E E' (E' →L⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) (RingHom.id 𝕜) (RingHom.id 𝕜) (innerSLFlip 𝕜)
#align continuous_linear_map.to_sesq_form ContinuousLinearMap.toSesqForm
@[simp]
theorem toSesqForm_apply_coe (f : E →L[𝕜] E') (x : E') : toSesqForm f x = (innerSL 𝕜 x).comp f :=
rfl
#align continuous_linear_map.to_sesq_form_apply_coe ContinuousLinearMap.toSesqForm_apply_coe
theorem toSesqForm_apply_norm_le {f : E →L[𝕜] E'} {v : E'} : ‖toSesqForm f v‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖v‖ := by
refine opNorm_le_bound _ (by positivity) fun x ↦ ?_
have h₁ : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := le_opNorm _ _
have h₂ := @norm_inner_le_norm 𝕜 E' _ _ _ v (f x)
calc
‖⟪v, f x⟫‖ ≤ ‖v‖ * ‖f x‖ := h₂
_ ≤ ‖v‖ * (‖f‖ * ‖x‖) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₁ (norm_nonneg v)
_ = ‖f‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖x‖ := by ring
#align continuous_linear_map.to_sesq_form_apply_norm_le ContinuousLinearMap.toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
end ContinuousLinearMap
/-- When an inner product space `E` over `𝕜` is considered as a real normed space, its inner
product satisfies `IsBoundedBilinearMap`.
In order to state these results, we need a `NormedSpace ℝ E` instance. We will later establish
such an instance by restriction-of-scalars, `InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E`, but this
instance may be not definitionally equal to some other “natural” instance. So, we assume
`[NormedSpace ℝ E]`.
-/
theorem _root_.isBoundedBilinearMap_inner [NormedSpace ℝ E] :
IsBoundedBilinearMap ℝ fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫ :=
{ add_left := inner_add_left
smul_left := fun r x y => by
simp only [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r x, algebraMap_eq_ofReal, inner_smul_real_left]
add_right := inner_add_right
smul_right := fun r x y => by
simp only [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r y, algebraMap_eq_ofReal, inner_smul_real_right]
bound :=
⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun x y => by
rw [one_mul]
exact norm_inner_le_norm x y⟩ }
#align is_bounded_bilinear_map_inner isBoundedBilinearMap_inner
end Norm
section BesselsInequality
variable {ι : Type*} (x : E) {v : ι → E}
/-- Bessel's inequality for finite sums. -/
theorem Orthonormal.sum_inner_products_le {s : Finset ι} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
∑ i ∈ s, ‖⟪v i, x⟫‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
have h₂ :
(∑ i ∈ s, ∑ j ∈ s, ⟪v i, x⟫ * ⟪x, v j⟫ * ⟪v j, v i⟫) = (∑ k ∈ s, ⟪v k, x⟫ * ⟪x, v k⟫ : 𝕜) := by
classical exact hv.inner_left_right_finset
have h₃ : ∀ z : 𝕜, re (z * conj z) = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
intro z
simp only [mul_conj, normSq_eq_def']
norm_cast
suffices hbf : ‖x - ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪v i, x⟫ • v i‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - ∑ i ∈ s, ‖⟪v i, x⟫‖ ^ 2 by
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← hbf]
simp only [norm_nonneg, pow_nonneg]
rw [@norm_sub_sq 𝕜, sub_add]
simp only [@InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner 𝕜, _root_.inner_sum, _root_.sum_inner]
simp only [inner_smul_right, two_mul, inner_smul_left, inner_conj_symm, ← mul_assoc, h₂,
add_sub_cancel_right, sub_right_inj]
simp only [map_sum, ← inner_conj_symm x, ← h₃]
#align orthonormal.sum_inner_products_le Orthonormal.sum_inner_products_le
/-- Bessel's inequality. -/
theorem Orthonormal.tsum_inner_products_le (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
∑' i, ‖⟪v i, x⟫‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
refine tsum_le_of_sum_le' ?_ fun s => hv.sum_inner_products_le x
simp only [norm_nonneg, pow_nonneg]
#align orthonormal.tsum_inner_products_le Orthonormal.tsum_inner_products_le
/-- The sum defined in Bessel's inequality is summable. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_products_summable (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
Summable fun i => ‖⟪v i, x⟫‖ ^ 2 := by
use ⨆ s : Finset ι, ∑ i ∈ s, ‖⟪v i, x⟫‖ ^ 2
apply hasSum_of_isLUB_of_nonneg
· intro b
simp only [norm_nonneg, pow_nonneg]
· refine isLUB_ciSup ?_
use ‖x‖ ^ 2
rintro y ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact hv.sum_inner_products_le x
#align orthonormal.inner_products_summable Orthonormal.inner_products_summable
end BesselsInequality
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := conj x * y
norm_sq_eq_inner x := by simp only [inner, conj_mul, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [add_mul, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.inner_product_space RCLike.innerProductSpace
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y :=
rfl
#align is_R_or_C.inner_apply RCLike.inner_apply
/-! ### Inner product space structure on subspaces -/
/-- Induced inner product on a submodule. -/
instance Submodule.innerProductSpace (W : Submodule 𝕜 E) : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 W :=
{ Submodule.normedSpace W with
inner := fun x y => ⟪(x : E), (y : E)⟫
conj_symm := fun _ _ => inner_conj_symm _ _
norm_sq_eq_inner := fun x => norm_sq_eq_inner (x : E)
add_left := fun _ _ _ => inner_add_left _ _ _
smul_left := fun _ _ _ => inner_smul_left _ _ _ }
#align submodule.inner_product_space Submodule.innerProductSpace
/-- The inner product on submodules is the same as on the ambient space. -/
@[simp]
theorem Submodule.coe_inner (W : Submodule 𝕜 E) (x y : W) : ⟪x, y⟫ = ⟪(x : E), ↑y⟫ :=
rfl
#align submodule.coe_inner Submodule.coe_inner
theorem Orthonormal.codRestrict {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (s : Submodule 𝕜 E)
(hvs : ∀ i, v i ∈ s) : @Orthonormal 𝕜 s _ _ _ ι (Set.codRestrict v s hvs) :=
s.subtypeₗᵢ.orthonormal_comp_iff.mp hv
#align orthonormal.cod_restrict Orthonormal.codRestrict
theorem orthonormal_span {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
@Orthonormal 𝕜 (Submodule.span 𝕜 (Set.range v)) _ _ _ ι fun i : ι =>
⟨v i, Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_range_self i)⟩ :=
hv.codRestrict (Submodule.span 𝕜 (Set.range v)) fun i =>
Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_range_self i)
#align orthonormal_span orthonormal_span
/-! ### Families of mutually-orthogonal subspaces of an inner product space -/
section OrthogonalFamily
variable {ι : Type*} (𝕜)
open DirectSum
/-- An indexed family of mutually-orthogonal subspaces of an inner product space `E`.
The simple way to express this concept would be as a condition on `V : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E`. We
instead implement it as a condition on a family of inner product spaces each equipped with an
isometric embedding into `E`, thus making it a property of morphisms rather than subobjects.
The connection to the subobject spelling is shown in `orthogonalFamily_iff_pairwise`.
This definition is less lightweight, but allows for better definitional properties when the inner
product space structure on each of the submodules is important -- for example, when considering
their Hilbert sum (`PiLp V 2`). For example, given an orthonormal set of vectors `v : ι → E`,
we have an associated orthogonal family of one-dimensional subspaces of `E`, which it is convenient
to be able to discuss using `ι → 𝕜` rather than `Π i : ι, span 𝕜 (v i)`. -/
def OrthogonalFamily (G : ι → Type*) [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (G i)]
[∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (G i)] (V : ∀ i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) : Prop :=
Pairwise fun i j => ∀ v : G i, ∀ w : G j, ⟪V i v, V j w⟫ = 0
#align orthogonal_family OrthogonalFamily
variable {𝕜}
variable {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (G i)] [∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (G i)]
{V : ∀ i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E} (hV : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 G V) [dec_V : ∀ (i) (x : G i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)]
theorem Orthonormal.orthogonalFamily {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun _i : ι => 𝕜) fun i => LinearIsometry.toSpanSingleton 𝕜 E (hv.1 i) :=
fun i j hij a b => by simp [inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, hv.2 hij]
#align orthonormal.orthogonal_family Orthonormal.orthogonalFamily
theorem OrthogonalFamily.eq_ite [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (v : G i) (w : G j) :
⟪V i v, V j w⟫ = ite (i = j) ⟪V i v, V j w⟫ 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· exact hV h v w
#align orthogonal_family.eq_ite OrthogonalFamily.eq_ite
theorem OrthogonalFamily.inner_right_dfinsupp [DecidableEq ι] (l : ⨁ i, G i) (i : ι) (v : G i) :
⟪V i v, l.sum fun j => V j⟫ = ⟪v, l i⟫ :=
calc
⟪V i v, l.sum fun j => V j⟫ = l.sum fun j => fun w => ⟪V i v, V j w⟫ :=
DFinsupp.inner_sum (fun j => V j) l (V i v)
_ = l.sum fun j => fun w => ite (i = j) ⟪V i v, V j w⟫ 0 :=
(congr_arg l.sum <| funext fun j => funext <| hV.eq_ite v)
_ = ⟪v, l i⟫ := by
simp only [DFinsupp.sum, Submodule.coe_inner, Finset.sum_ite_eq, ite_eq_left_iff,
DFinsupp.mem_support_toFun]
split_ifs with h
· simp only [LinearIsometry.inner_map_map]
· simp only [of_not_not h, inner_zero_right]
#align orthogonal_family.inner_right_dfinsupp OrthogonalFamily.inner_right_dfinsupp
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 2,037 | 2,045 | theorem OrthogonalFamily.inner_right_fintype [Fintype ι] (l : ∀ i, G i) (i : ι) (v : G i) :
⟪V i v, ∑ j : ι, V j (l j)⟫ = ⟪v, l i⟫ := by |
classical
calc
⟪V i v, ∑ j : ι, V j (l j)⟫ = ∑ j : ι, ⟪V i v, V j (l j)⟫ := by rw [inner_sum]
_ = ∑ j, ite (i = j) ⟪V i v, V j (l j)⟫ 0 :=
(congr_arg (Finset.sum Finset.univ) <| funext fun j => hV.eq_ite v (l j))
_ = ⟪v, l i⟫ := by
simp only [Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, (V i).inner_map_map, if_true]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
#align_import data.real.nnreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b1abe23ae96fef89ad30d9f4362c307f72a55010"
/-!
# Nonnegative real numbers
In this file we define `NNReal` (notation: `ℝ≥0`) to be the type of non-negative real numbers,
a.k.a. the interval `[0, ∞)`. We also define the following operations and structures on `ℝ≥0`:
* the order on `ℝ≥0` is the restriction of the order on `ℝ`; these relations define a conditionally
complete linear order with a bottom element, `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot`;
* `a + b` and `a * b` are the restrictions of addition and multiplication of real numbers to `ℝ≥0`;
these operations together with `0 = ⟨0, _⟩` and `1 = ⟨1, _⟩` turn `ℝ≥0` into a conditionally
complete linear ordered archimedean commutative semifield; we have no typeclass for this in
`mathlib` yet, so we define the following instances instead:
- `LinearOrderedSemiring ℝ≥0`;
- `OrderedCommSemiring ℝ≥0`;
- `CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring ℝ≥0`;
- `LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero ℝ≥0`;
- `CanonicallyLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0`;
- `Archimedean ℝ≥0`;
- `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ℝ≥0`.
These instances are derived from corresponding instances about the type `{x : α // 0 ≤ x}` in an
appropriate ordered field/ring/group/monoid `α`, see `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Ring`.
* `Real.toNNReal x` is defined as `⟨max x 0, _⟩`, i.e. `↑(Real.toNNReal x) = x` when `0 ≤ x` and
`↑(Real.toNNReal x) = 0` otherwise.
We also define an instance `CanLift ℝ ℝ≥0`. This instance can be used by the `lift` tactic to
replace `x : ℝ` and `hx : 0 ≤ x` in the proof context with `x : ℝ≥0` while replacing all occurrences
of `x` with `↑x`. This tactic also works for a function `f : α → ℝ` with a hypothesis
`hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x`.
## Notations
This file defines `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
open Function
-- to ensure these instances are computable
/-- Nonnegative real numbers. -/
def NNReal := { r : ℝ // 0 ≤ r } deriving
Zero, One, Semiring, StrictOrderedSemiring, CommMonoidWithZero, CommSemiring,
SemilatticeInf, SemilatticeSup, DistribLattice, OrderedCommSemiring,
CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring, Inhabited
#align nnreal NNReal
namespace NNReal
scoped notation "ℝ≥0" => NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
instance instDenselyOrdered : DenselyOrdered ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.instDenselyOrdered
instance : OrderBot ℝ≥0 := inferInstance
instance : Archimedean ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.archimedean
noncomputable instance : Sub ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.sub
noncomputable instance : OrderedSub ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.orderedSub
noncomputable instance : CanonicallyLinearOrderedSemifield ℝ≥0 :=
Nonneg.canonicallyLinearOrderedSemifield
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ`. -/
@[coe] def toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ := Subtype.val
instance : Coe ℝ≥0 ℝ := ⟨toReal⟩
-- Simp lemma to put back `n.val` into the normal form given by the coercion.
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_coe (n : ℝ≥0) : n.val = n :=
rfl
#align nnreal.val_eq_coe NNReal.val_eq_coe
instance canLift : CanLift ℝ ℝ≥0 toReal fun r => 0 ≤ r :=
Subtype.canLift _
#align nnreal.can_lift NNReal.canLift
@[ext] protected theorem eq {n m : ℝ≥0} : (n : ℝ) = (m : ℝ) → n = m :=
Subtype.eq
#align nnreal.eq NNReal.eq
protected theorem eq_iff {n m : ℝ≥0} : (n : ℝ) = (m : ℝ) ↔ n = m :=
Subtype.ext_iff.symm
#align nnreal.eq_iff NNReal.eq_iff
theorem ne_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} : (x : ℝ) ≠ (y : ℝ) ↔ x ≠ y :=
not_congr <| NNReal.eq_iff
#align nnreal.ne_iff NNReal.ne_iff
protected theorem «forall» {p : ℝ≥0 → Prop} :
(∀ x : ℝ≥0, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x), p ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align nnreal.forall NNReal.forall
protected theorem «exists» {p : ℝ≥0 → Prop} :
(∃ x : ℝ≥0, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x), p ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align nnreal.exists NNReal.exists
/-- Reinterpret a real number `r` as a non-negative real number. Returns `0` if `r < 0`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.Real.toNNReal (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨max r 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
#align real.to_nnreal Real.toNNReal
theorem _root_.Real.coe_toNNReal (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) : (Real.toNNReal r : ℝ) = r :=
max_eq_left hr
#align real.coe_to_nnreal Real.coe_toNNReal
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.toNNReal = ⟨r, hr⟩ := by
simp_rw [Real.toNNReal, max_eq_left hr]
#align real.to_nnreal_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg
theorem _root_.Real.le_coe_toNNReal (r : ℝ) : r ≤ Real.toNNReal r :=
le_max_left r 0
#align real.le_coe_to_nnreal Real.le_coe_toNNReal
theorem coe_nonneg (r : ℝ≥0) : (0 : ℝ) ≤ r := r.2
#align nnreal.coe_nonneg NNReal.coe_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_mk (a : ℝ) (ha) : toReal ⟨a, ha⟩ = a := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_mk NNReal.coe_mk
example : Zero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : One ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Add ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Sub ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Mul ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Inv ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Div ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : LE ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Bot ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Inhabited ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Nontrivial ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
protected theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) := Subtype.coe_injective
#align nnreal.coe_injective NNReal.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inj {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} : (r₁ : ℝ) = r₂ ↔ r₁ = r₂ :=
NNReal.coe_injective.eq_iff
#align nnreal.coe_eq NNReal.coe_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-03")] protected alias coe_eq := coe_inj
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 0 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_zero NNReal.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 1 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_one NNReal.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_add (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ + r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ + r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_add NNReal.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_mul (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ * r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ * r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_mul NNReal.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_inv (r : ℝ≥0) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_inv NNReal.coe_inv
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_div (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ / r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r₁ : ℝ) / r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_div NNReal.coe_div
#noalign nnreal.coe_bit0
#noalign nnreal.coe_bit1
protected theorem coe_two : ((2 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 2 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_two NNReal.coe_two
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_sub {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} (h : r₂ ≤ r₁) : ((r₁ - r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = ↑r₁ - ↑r₂ :=
max_eq_left <| le_sub_comm.2 <| by simp [show (r₂ : ℝ) ≤ r₁ from h]
#align nnreal.coe_sub NNReal.coe_sub
variable {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} {x y : ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_zero : (r : ℝ) = 0 ↔ r = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, coe_inj]
#align coe_eq_zero NNReal.coe_eq_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_one : (r : ℝ) = 1 ↔ r = 1 := by rw [← coe_one, coe_inj]
#align coe_inj_one NNReal.coe_eq_one
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ne_zero : (r : ℝ) ≠ 0 ↔ r ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
#align nnreal.coe_ne_zero NNReal.coe_ne_zero
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ne_one : (r : ℝ) ≠ 1 ↔ r ≠ 1 := coe_eq_one.not
example : CommSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ` as a `RingHom`.
Porting note (#11215): TODO: what if we define `Coe ℝ≥0 ℝ` using this function? -/
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := NNReal.coe_one
map_mul' := NNReal.coe_mul
map_zero' := NNReal.coe_zero
map_add' := NNReal.coe_add
#align nnreal.to_real_hom NNReal.toRealHom
@[simp] theorem coe_toRealHom : ⇑toRealHom = toReal := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_to_real_hom NNReal.coe_toRealHom
section Actions
/-- A `MulAction` over `ℝ` restricts to a `MulAction` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [MulAction ℝ M] : MulAction ℝ≥0 M :=
MulAction.compHom M toRealHom.toMonoidHom
theorem smul_def {M : Type*} [MulAction ℝ M] (c : ℝ≥0) (x : M) : c • x = (c : ℝ) • x :=
rfl
#align nnreal.smul_def NNReal.smul_def
instance {M N : Type*} [MulAction ℝ M] [MulAction ℝ N] [SMul M N] [IsScalarTower ℝ M N] :
IsScalarTower ℝ≥0 M N where smul_assoc r := (smul_assoc (r : ℝ) : _)
instance smulCommClass_left {M N : Type*} [MulAction ℝ N] [SMul M N] [SMulCommClass ℝ M N] :
SMulCommClass ℝ≥0 M N where smul_comm r := (smul_comm (r : ℝ) : _)
#align nnreal.smul_comm_class_left NNReal.smulCommClass_left
instance smulCommClass_right {M N : Type*} [MulAction ℝ N] [SMul M N] [SMulCommClass M ℝ N] :
SMulCommClass M ℝ≥0 N where smul_comm m r := (smul_comm m (r : ℝ) : _)
#align nnreal.smul_comm_class_right NNReal.smulCommClass_right
/-- A `DistribMulAction` over `ℝ` restricts to a `DistribMulAction` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] [DistribMulAction ℝ M] : DistribMulAction ℝ≥0 M :=
DistribMulAction.compHom M toRealHom.toMonoidHom
/-- A `Module` over `ℝ` restricts to a `Module` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module ℝ M] : Module ℝ≥0 M :=
Module.compHom M toRealHom
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: after this line, `↑` uses `Algebra.cast` instead of `toReal`
/-- An `Algebra` over `ℝ` restricts to an `Algebra` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra ℝ A] : Algebra ℝ≥0 A where
smul := (· • ·)
commutes' r x := by simp [Algebra.commutes]
smul_def' r x := by simp [← Algebra.smul_def (r : ℝ) x, smul_def]
toRingHom := (algebraMap ℝ A).comp (toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ)
instance : StarRing ℝ≥0 := starRingOfComm
instance : TrivialStar ℝ≥0 where
star_trivial _ := rfl
instance : StarModule ℝ≥0 ℝ where
star_smul := by simp only [star_trivial, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
-- verify that the above produces instances we might care about
example : Algebra ℝ≥0 ℝ := by infer_instance
example : DistribMulAction ℝ≥0ˣ ℝ := by infer_instance
end Actions
example : MonoidWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : CommMonoidWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : CommGroupWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
#align nnreal.coe_indicator NNReal.coe_indicator
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (r : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ) ^ n := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_pow NNReal.coe_pow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zpow (r : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ) ^ n := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_zpow NNReal.coe_zpow
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
#align nnreal.coe_list_sum NNReal.coe_list_sum
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
#align nnreal.coe_list_prod NNReal.coe_list_prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
#align nnreal.coe_multiset_sum NNReal.coe_multiset_sum
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
#align nnreal.coe_multiset_prod NNReal.coe_multiset_prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑(∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
#align nnreal.coe_sum NNReal.coe_sum
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
#align real.to_nnreal_sum_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
#align nnreal.coe_prod NNReal.coe_prod
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
#align real.to_nnreal_prod_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: `simp`? `norm_cast`?
theorem coe_nsmul (r : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ↑(n • r) = n • (r : ℝ) := rfl
#align nnreal.nsmul_coe NNReal.coe_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : (↑(↑n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = n :=
map_natCast toRealHom n
#align nnreal.coe_nat_cast NNReal.coe_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_nat_cast := NNReal.coe_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_ofScientific (m : ℕ) (s : Bool) (e : ℕ) :
↑(OfScientific.ofScientific m s e : ℝ≥0) = (OfScientific.ofScientific m s e : ℝ) :=
rfl
noncomputable example : LinearOrder ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : (r₁ : ℝ) ≤ r₂ ↔ r₁ ≤ r₂ := Iff.rfl
#align nnreal.coe_le_coe NNReal.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : (r₁ : ℝ) < r₂ ↔ r₁ < r₂ := Iff.rfl
#align nnreal.coe_lt_coe NNReal.coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pos : (0 : ℝ) < r ↔ 0 < r := Iff.rfl
#align nnreal.coe_pos NNReal.coe_pos
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_le_coe : 1 ≤ (r : ℝ) ↔ 1 ≤ r := by rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_lt_coe : 1 < (r : ℝ) ↔ 1 < r := by rw [← coe_lt_coe, coe_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_one : (r : ℝ) ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 := by rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_one : (r : ℝ) < 1 ↔ r < 1 := by rw [← coe_lt_coe, coe_one]
@[mono] lemma coe_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) := fun _ _ => NNReal.coe_le_coe.2
#align nnreal.coe_mono NNReal.coe_mono
/-- Alias for the use of `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, GCongr.toReal_le_toReal⟩ := coe_le_coe
protected theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_mono : Monotone Real.toNNReal := fun _ _ h =>
max_le_max h (le_refl 0)
#align real.to_nnreal_mono Real.toNNReal_mono
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : Real.toNNReal r = r :=
NNReal.eq <| max_eq_left r.2
#align real.to_nnreal_coe Real.toNNReal_coe
@[simp]
theorem mk_natCast (n : ℕ) : @Eq ℝ≥0 (⟨(n : ℝ), n.cast_nonneg⟩ : ℝ≥0) n :=
NNReal.eq (NNReal.coe_natCast n).symm
#align nnreal.mk_coe_nat NNReal.mk_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias mk_coe_nat := mk_natCast
-- Porting note: place this in the `Real` namespace
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : Real.toNNReal n = n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simp [Real.coe_toNNReal]
#align nnreal.to_nnreal_coe_nat NNReal.toNNReal_coe_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Real.toNNReal (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
toNNReal_coe_nat n
/-- `Real.toNNReal` and `NNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ` form a Galois insertion. -/
noncomputable def gi : GaloisInsertion Real.toNNReal (↑) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro NNReal.coe_mono Real.toNNReal_mono Real.le_coe_toNNReal fun _ =>
Real.toNNReal_coe
#align nnreal.gi NNReal.gi
-- note that anything involving the (decidability of the) linear order,
-- will be noncomputable, everything else should not be.
example : OrderBot ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : PartialOrder ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : CanonicallyLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : DistribLattice ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : SemilatticeInf ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : SemilatticeSup ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : OrderedCommSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedCommMonoid ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : DenselyOrdered ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : NoMaxOrder ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
instance instPosSMulStrictMono {α} [Preorder α] [MulAction ℝ α] [PosSMulStrictMono ℝ α] :
PosSMulStrictMono ℝ≥0 α where
elim _r hr _a₁ _a₂ ha := (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left ha (coe_pos.2 hr):)
instance instSMulPosStrictMono {α} [Zero α] [Preorder α] [MulAction ℝ α] [SMulPosStrictMono ℝ α] :
SMulPosStrictMono ℝ≥0 α where
elim _a ha _r₁ _r₂ hr := (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right (coe_lt_coe.2 hr) ha:)
/-- If `a` is a nonnegative real number, then the closed interval `[0, a]` in `ℝ` is order
isomorphic to the interval `Set.Iic a`. -/
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore once `simps` supports `ℝ≥0` @[simps!? apply_coe_coe]
def orderIsoIccZeroCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) a ≃o Set.Iic a where
toEquiv := Equiv.Set.sep (Set.Ici 0) fun x : ℝ => x ≤ a
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align nnreal.order_iso_Icc_zero_coe NNReal.orderIsoIccZeroCoe
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIccZeroCoe_apply_coe_coe (a : ℝ≥0) (b : Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) a) :
(orderIsoIccZeroCoe a b : ℝ) = b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIccZeroCoe_symm_apply_coe (a : ℝ≥0) (b : Set.Iic a) :
((orderIsoIccZeroCoe a).symm b : ℝ) = b :=
rfl
#align nnreal.order_iso_Icc_zero_coe_symm_apply_coe NNReal.orderIsoIccZeroCoe_symm_apply_coe
-- note we need the `@` to make the `Membership.mem` have a sensible type
theorem coe_image {s : Set ℝ≥0} :
(↑) '' s = { x : ℝ | ∃ h : 0 ≤ x, @Membership.mem ℝ≥0 _ _ ⟨x, h⟩ s } :=
Subtype.coe_image
#align nnreal.coe_image NNReal.coe_image
theorem bddAbove_coe {s : Set ℝ≥0} : BddAbove (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) '' s) ↔ BddAbove s :=
Iff.intro
(fun ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
⟨Real.toNNReal b, fun ⟨y, _⟩ hys =>
show y ≤ max b 0 from le_max_of_le_left <| hb <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hys⟩)
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, fun _ ⟨_, hx, eq⟩ => eq ▸ hb hx⟩
#align nnreal.bdd_above_coe NNReal.bddAbove_coe
theorem bddBelow_coe (s : Set ℝ≥0) : BddBelow (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) '' s) :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨q, _, eq⟩ => eq ▸ q.2⟩
#align nnreal.bdd_below_coe NNReal.bddBelow_coe
noncomputable instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ℝ≥0 :=
Nonneg.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot 0
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0) : (↑(sSup s) : ℝ) = sSup (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) '' s) := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|hs
· simp
by_cases H : BddAbove s
· have A : sSup (Subtype.val '' s) ∈ Set.Ici 0 := by
apply Real.sSup_nonneg
rintro - ⟨y, -, rfl⟩
exact y.2
exact (@subset_sSup_of_within ℝ (Set.Ici (0 : ℝ)) _ _ (_) s hs H A).symm
· simp only [csSup_of_not_bddAbove H, csSup_empty, bot_eq_zero', NNReal.coe_zero]
apply (Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove ?_).symm
contrapose! H
exact bddAbove_coe.1 H
#align nnreal.coe_Sup NNReal.coe_sSup
@[simp, norm_cast] -- Porting note: add `simp`
theorem coe_iSup {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → ℝ≥0) : (↑(⨆ i, s i) : ℝ) = ⨆ i, ↑(s i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, coe_sSup, ← Set.range_comp]; rfl
#align nnreal.coe_supr NNReal.coe_iSup
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0) : (↑(sInf s) : ℝ) = sInf (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) '' s) := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|hs
· simp only [Set.image_empty, Real.sInf_empty, coe_eq_zero]
exact @subset_sInf_emptyset ℝ (Set.Ici (0 : ℝ)) _ _ (_)
have A : sInf (Subtype.val '' s) ∈ Set.Ici 0 := by
apply Real.sInf_nonneg
rintro - ⟨y, -, rfl⟩
exact y.2
exact (@subset_sInf_of_within ℝ (Set.Ici (0 : ℝ)) _ _ (_) s hs (OrderBot.bddBelow s) A).symm
#align nnreal.coe_Inf NNReal.coe_sInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set ℝ≥0) = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_sInf, Set.image_empty, Real.sInf_empty]
#align nnreal.Inf_empty NNReal.sInf_empty
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → ℝ≥0) : (↑(⨅ i, s i) : ℝ) = ⨅ i, ↑(s i) := by
rw [iInf, iInf, coe_sInf, ← Set.range_comp]; rfl
#align nnreal.coe_infi NNReal.coe_iInf
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
#align nnreal.le_infi_add_infi NNReal.le_iInf_add_iInf
example : Archimedean ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: remove?
instance covariant_add : CovariantClass ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0 (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) := inferInstance
#align nnreal.covariant_add NNReal.covariant_add
instance contravariant_add : ContravariantClass ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0 (· + ·) (· < ·) := inferInstance
#align nnreal.contravariant_add NNReal.contravariant_add
instance covariant_mul : CovariantClass ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0 (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) := inferInstance
#align nnreal.covariant_mul NNReal.covariant_mul
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: delete?
nonrec theorem le_of_forall_pos_le_add {a b : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → a ≤ b + ε) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_forall_pos_le_add h
#align nnreal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add NNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
theorem lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn (a b : ℝ≥0) :
a < b ↔ ∃ q : ℚ, 0 ≤ q ∧ a < Real.toNNReal q ∧ Real.toNNReal q < b :=
Iff.intro
(fun h : (↑a : ℝ) < (↑b : ℝ) =>
let ⟨q, haq, hqb⟩ := exists_rat_btwn h
have : 0 ≤ (q : ℝ) := le_trans a.2 <| le_of_lt haq
⟨q, Rat.cast_nonneg.1 this, by
simp [Real.coe_toNNReal _ this, NNReal.coe_lt_coe.symm, haq, hqb]⟩)
fun ⟨q, _, haq, hqb⟩ => lt_trans haq hqb
#align nnreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn NNReal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : ℝ≥0) = 0 := rfl
#align nnreal.bot_eq_zero NNReal.bot_eq_zero
theorem mul_sup (a b c : ℝ≥0) : a * (b ⊔ c) = a * b ⊔ a * c :=
mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| zero_le a
#align nnreal.mul_sup NNReal.mul_sup
theorem sup_mul (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a ⊔ b) * c = a * c ⊔ b * c :=
max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ <| zero_le c
#align nnreal.sup_mul NNReal.sup_mul
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
#align nnreal.mul_finset_sup NNReal.mul_finset_sup
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
#align nnreal.finset_sup_mul NNReal.finset_sup_mul
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
#align nnreal.finset_sup_div NNReal.finset_sup_div
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℝ≥0) : ((max x y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = max (x : ℝ) (y : ℝ) :=
NNReal.coe_mono.map_max
#align nnreal.coe_max NNReal.coe_max
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℝ≥0) : ((min x y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = min (x : ℝ) (y : ℝ) :=
NNReal.coe_mono.map_min
#align nnreal.coe_min NNReal.coe_min
@[simp]
theorem zero_le_coe {q : ℝ≥0} : 0 ≤ (q : ℝ) :=
q.2
#align nnreal.zero_le_coe NNReal.zero_le_coe
instance instOrderedSMul {M : Type*} [OrderedAddCommMonoid M] [Module ℝ M] [OrderedSMul ℝ M] :
OrderedSMul ℝ≥0 M where
smul_lt_smul_of_pos hab hc := (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hab (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hc) : _)
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos {a b c} hab _ :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_left (by exact hab) (NNReal.coe_nonneg c)
end NNReal
open NNReal
namespace Real
section ToNNReal
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNNReal' (r : ℝ) : (Real.toNNReal r : ℝ) = max r 0 :=
rfl
#align real.coe_to_nnreal' Real.coe_toNNReal'
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_zero : Real.toNNReal 0 = 0 := NNReal.eq <| coe_toNNReal _ le_rfl
#align real.to_nnreal_zero Real.toNNReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_one : Real.toNNReal 1 = 1 := NNReal.eq <| coe_toNNReal _ zero_le_one
#align real.to_nnreal_one Real.toNNReal_one
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_pos {r : ℝ} : 0 < Real.toNNReal r ↔ 0 < r := by
simp [← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, lt_irrefl]
#align real.to_nnreal_pos Real.toNNReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_eq_zero {r : ℝ} : Real.toNNReal r = 0 ↔ r ≤ 0 := by
simpa [-toNNReal_pos] using not_iff_not.2 (@toNNReal_pos r)
#align real.to_nnreal_eq_zero Real.toNNReal_eq_zero
theorem toNNReal_of_nonpos {r : ℝ} : r ≤ 0 → Real.toNNReal r = 0 :=
toNNReal_eq_zero.2
#align real.to_nnreal_of_nonpos Real.toNNReal_of_nonpos
lemma toNNReal_eq_iff_eq_coe {r : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0} (hp : p ≠ 0) : r.toNNReal = p ↔ r = p :=
⟨fun h ↦ h ▸ (coe_toNNReal _ <| not_lt.1 fun hlt ↦ hp <| h ▸ toNNReal_of_nonpos hlt.le).symm,
fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ toNNReal_coe⟩
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : r.toNNReal = 1 ↔ r = 1 := toNNReal_eq_iff_eq_coe one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : r.toNNReal = n ↔ r = n :=
mod_cast toNNReal_eq_iff_eq_coe <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias toNNReal_eq_nat_cast := toNNReal_eq_natCast
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
r.toNNReal = no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
toNNReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Real/NNReal.lean | 689 | 690 | theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff {r p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
toNNReal r ≤ toNNReal p ↔ r ≤ p := by | simp [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, hp]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Cycle factors of a permutation
Let `β` be a `Fintype` and `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleOf`: `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of `f` that `x` belongs to.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleFactors`: `f.cycleFactors` is a list of disjoint cyclic permutations
that multiply to `f`.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-!
### `cycleOf`
-/
section CycleOf
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of the permutation `f` to which `x` belongs. -/
def cycleOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : Perm α :=
ofSubtype (subtypePerm f fun _ => sameCycle_apply_right.symm : Perm { y // SameCycle f x y })
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of Equiv.Perm.cycleOf
theorem cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) (x y : α) :
cycleOf f x y = if SameCycle f x y then f y else y := by
dsimp only [cycleOf]
split_ifs with h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_mem
exact h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem
exact h
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply
theorem cycleOf_inv (f : Perm α) (x : α) : (cycleOf f x)⁻¹ = cycleOf f⁻¹ x :=
Equiv.ext fun y => by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_inv_apply_right]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_inv Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_inv
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_pow_apply_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro n
induction' n with n hn
· rfl
· rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, cycleOf_apply, hn, if_pos, pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨n, rfl⟩
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_pow_apply_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_pow_apply_self
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_zpow_apply_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) :
∀ n : ℤ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro z
induction' z with z hz
· exact cycleOf_pow_apply_self f x z
· rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_inv, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_pow_apply_self]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_zpow_apply_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_zpow_apply_self
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_apply : SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = f y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _
#align equiv.perm.same_cycle.cycle_of_apply Equiv.Perm.SameCycle.cycleOf_apply
theorem cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle : ¬SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_of_not_same_cycle Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_eq (h : SameCycle f x y) : cycleOf f x = cycleOf f y := by
ext z
rw [Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hz
· exact (h.symm.trans hz).cycleOf_apply.symm
· exact (cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle (mt h.trans hz)).symm
#align equiv.perm.same_cycle.cycle_of_eq Equiv.Perm.SameCycle.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) (k : ℤ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
rw [SameCycle.cycleOf_apply]
· rw [add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply]
· exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_apply_zpow_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) (k : ℕ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self f x k using 1
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_apply_pow_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) : cycleOf f x (f x) = f (f x) := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self f x 1 using 1
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_apply_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_apply_self
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_self (f : Perm α) (x : α) : cycleOf f x x = f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_apply_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply_self
theorem IsCycle.cycleOf_eq (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) : cycleOf f x = f :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
if h : SameCycle f x y then by rw [h.cycleOf_apply]
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle h,
Classical.not_not.1 (mt ((isCycle_iff_sameCycle hx).1 hf).2 h)]
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle.cycle_of_eq Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_eq_one_iff (f : Perm α) : cycleOf f x = 1 ↔ f x = x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, cycleOf_apply, one_apply]
refine ⟨fun h => (if_pos (SameCycle.refl f x)).symm.trans (h x), fun h y => ?_⟩
by_cases hy : f y = y
· rw [hy, ite_self]
· exact if_neg (mt SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff (by tauto))
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_eq_one_iff Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply (f : Perm α) (x : α) : cycleOf f (f x) = cycleOf f x :=
(sameCycle_apply_right.2 SameCycle.rfl).symm.cycleOf_eq
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_self_apply Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_self_apply
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_pow (f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) (x : α) : cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.pow_left.cycleOf_eq
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_self_apply_pow Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_self_apply_pow
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_zpow (f : Perm α) (n : ℤ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.zpow_left.cycleOf_eq
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_self_apply_zpow Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_self_apply_zpow
protected theorem IsCycle.cycleOf (hf : IsCycle f) : cycleOf f x = if f x = x then 1 else f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rwa [if_pos hx, cycleOf_eq_one_iff]
· rwa [if_neg hx, hf.cycleOf_eq]
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle.cycle_of Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.cycleOf
theorem cycleOf_one (x : α) : cycleOf 1 x = 1 :=
(cycleOf_eq_one_iff 1).mpr rfl
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_one Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_one
theorem isCycle_cycleOf (f : Perm α) (hx : f x ≠ x) : IsCycle (cycleOf f x) :=
have : cycleOf f x x ≠ x := by rwa [SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply]
(isCycle_iff_sameCycle this).2 @fun y =>
⟨fun h => mt h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 this, fun h =>
if hxy : SameCycle f x y then
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hxy
⟨i, by rw [cycleOf_zpow_apply_self, hi]⟩
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy] at h
exact (h rfl).elim⟩
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle_cycle_of Equiv.Perm.isCycle_cycleOf
@[simp]
theorem two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff : 2 ≤ card (cycleOf f x).support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by simpa using (isCycle_cycleOf _ h).two_le_card_support⟩
contrapose! h
rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at h
simp [h]
#align equiv.perm.two_le_card_support_cycle_of_iff Equiv.Perm.two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff
@[simp]
theorem card_support_cycleOf_pos_iff : 0 < card (cycleOf f x).support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
rw [← two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff, ← Nat.succ_le_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => Or.resolve_left h.eq_or_lt (card_support_ne_one _).symm, zero_lt_two.trans_le⟩
#align equiv.perm.card_support_cycle_of_pos_iff Equiv.Perm.card_support_cycleOf_pos_iff
theorem pow_mod_orderOf_cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
(f ^ (n % orderOf (cycleOf f x))) x = (f ^ n) x := by
rw [← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, pow_mod_orderOf]
#align equiv.perm.pow_apply_eq_pow_mod_order_of_cycle_of_apply Equiv.Perm.pow_mod_orderOf_cycleOf_apply
theorem cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self (h : Commute f g) (x : α) (hx : g x = x) :
(f * g).cycleOf x = f.cycleOf x := by
ext y
by_cases hxy : (f * g).SameCycle x y
· obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hxy
rw [cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self]
simp [h.mul_zpow, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
· rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy, cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle]
contrapose! hxy
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hxy
refine ⟨z, ?_⟩
simp [h.mul_zpow, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_of_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self
theorem Disjoint.cycleOf_mul_distrib (h : f.Disjoint g) (x : α) :
(f * g).cycleOf x = f.cycleOf x * g.cycleOf x := by
cases' (disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq.mp h) x with hfx hgx
· simp [h.commute.eq, cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self h.symm.commute, hfx]
· simp [cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self h.commute, hgx]
#align equiv.perm.disjoint.cycle_of_mul_distrib Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.cycleOf_mul_distrib
theorem support_cycleOf_eq_nil_iff : (f.cycleOf x).support = ∅ ↔ x ∉ f.support := by simp
#align equiv.perm.support_cycle_of_eq_nil_iff Equiv.Perm.support_cycleOf_eq_nil_iff
theorem support_cycleOf_le (f : Perm α) (x : α) : support (f.cycleOf x) ≤ support f := by
intro y hy
rw [mem_support, cycleOf_apply] at hy
split_ifs at hy
· exact mem_support.mpr hy
· exact absurd rfl hy
#align equiv.perm.support_cycle_of_le Equiv.Perm.support_cycleOf_le
theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff : y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y ∧ x ∈ support f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [(cycleOf_eq_one_iff _).mpr hx]
simp [hx]
· rw [mem_support, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hy
· simp only [hx, hy, iff_true_iff, Ne, not_false_iff, and_self_iff, mem_support]
rcases hy with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [← not_mem_support]
simpa using hx
· simpa [hx] using hy
#align equiv.perm.mem_support_cycle_of_iff Equiv.Perm.mem_support_cycleOf_iff
theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff' (hx : f x ≠ x) : y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [mem_support_cycleOf_iff, and_iff_left (mem_support.2 hx)]
#align equiv.perm.mem_support_cycle_of_iff' Equiv.Perm.mem_support_cycleOf_iff'
theorem SameCycle.mem_support_iff (h : SameCycle f x y) : x ∈ support f ↔ y ∈ support f :=
⟨fun hx => support_cycleOf_le f x (mem_support_cycleOf_iff.mpr ⟨h, hx⟩), fun hy =>
support_cycleOf_le f y (mem_support_cycleOf_iff.mpr ⟨h.symm, hy⟩)⟩
#align equiv.perm.same_cycle.mem_support_iff Equiv.Perm.SameCycle.mem_support_iff
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Factors.lean | 250 | 255 | theorem pow_mod_card_support_cycleOf_self_apply (f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
(f ^ (n % (f.cycleOf x).support.card)) x = (f ^ n) x := by |
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
· rw [← cycleOf_pow_apply_self, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, ← (isCycle_cycleOf f hx).orderOf,
pow_mod_orderOf]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Semicontinuous
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableSequence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# Borel sigma algebras on spaces with orders
## Main statements
* `borel_eq_generateFrom_Ixx` (where Ixx is one of {Iio, Ioi, Iic, Ici, Ico, Ioc}):
The Borel sigma algebra of a linear order topology is generated by intervals of the given kind.
* `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem`, `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem`:
The Borel sigma algebra of a dense linear order topology is generated by intervals of a given
kind, with endpoints from dense subsets.
* `ext_of_Ico`, `ext_of_Ioc`:
A locally finite Borel measure on a second countable conditionally complete linear order is
characterized by the measures of intervals of the given kind.
* `ext_of_Iic`, `ext_of_Ici`:
A finite Borel measure on a second countable linear order is characterized by the measures of
intervals of the given kind.
* `UpperSemicontinuous.measurable`, `LowerSemicontinuous.measurable`:
Semicontinuous functions are measurable.
* `measurable_iSup`, `measurable_iInf`, `measurable_sSup`, `measurable_sInf`:
Countable supremums and infimums of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
* `measurable_liminf`, `measurable_limsup`:
Countable liminfs and limsups of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
-/
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
section OrderTopology
variable (α)
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio : borel α = .generateFrom (range Iio) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le ?_)
· rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_of_subbasis (@OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals α _ _ _)]
letI : MeasurableSpace α := MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iio)
have H : ∀ a : α, MeasurableSet (Iio a) := fun a => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
refine generateFrom_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩
· rcases em (∃ b, a ⋖ b) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hcovBy
· rw [hb.Ioi_eq, ← compl_Iio]
exact (H _).compl
· rcases isOpen_biUnion_countable (Ioi a) Ioi fun _ _ ↦ isOpen_Ioi with ⟨t, hat, htc, htU⟩
have : Ioi a = ⋃ b ∈ t, Ici b := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ <| iUnion₂_subset fun b hb ↦ Ici_subset_Ioi.2 (hat hb)
refine Subset.trans ?_ <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ ↦ Ioi_subset_Ici_self
simpa [CovBy, htU, subset_def] using hcovBy
simp only [this, ← compl_Iio]
exact .biUnion htc <| fun _ _ ↦ (H _).compl
· apply H
· rw [forall_mem_range]
intro a
exact GenerateMeasurable.basic _ isOpen_Iio
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Iio borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi : borel α = .generateFrom (range Ioi) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio αᵒᵈ _ (by infer_instance : SecondCountableTopology α) _ _
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Ioi borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic :
borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iic) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Ioi]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Iic borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici : borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Ici) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Ici borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici
end OrderTopology
section Orders
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
variable [MeasurableSpace δ]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α}
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a) :=
isClosed_Ici.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Ici measurableSet_Ici
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a) :=
isClosed_Iic.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Iic measurableSet_Iic
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Icc : MeasurableSet (Icc a b) :=
isClosed_Icc.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Icc measurableSet_Icc
instance nhdsWithin_Ici_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ici b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ici.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
#align nhds_within_Ici_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Ici_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance nhdsWithin_Iic_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iic b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iic.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
#align nhds_within_Iic_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Iic_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[Icc a b] x) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, nhdsWithin_inter]
infer_instance
#align nhds_within_Icc_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance atTop_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atTop : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
#align at_top_is_measurably_generated atTop_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance atBot_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atBot : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
#align at_bot_is_measurably_generated atBot_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance [R1Space α] : IsMeasurablyGenerated (cocompact α) where
exists_measurable_subset := by
intro _ hs
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := mem_cocompact.mp hs
exact ⟨(closure t)ᶜ, ht.closure.compl_mem_cocompact, isClosed_closure.measurableSet.compl,
(compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure).trans hts⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {a b : α}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le' : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_le' measurableSet_le'
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
MeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } :=
hf.prod_mk hg measurableSet_le'
#align measurable_set_le measurableSet_le
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α}
-- we open this locale only here to avoid issues with list being treated as intervals above
open Interval
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iio : MeasurableSet (Iio a) :=
isOpen_Iio.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Iio measurableSet_Iio
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioi : MeasurableSet (Ioi a) :=
isOpen_Ioi.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Ioi measurableSet_Ioi
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioo : MeasurableSet (Ioo a b) :=
isOpen_Ioo.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Ioo measurableSet_Ioo
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc a b) :=
measurableSet_Ioi.inter measurableSet_Iic
#align measurable_set_Ioc measurableSet_Ioc
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ico : MeasurableSet (Ico a b) :=
measurableSet_Ici.inter measurableSet_Iio
#align measurable_set_Ico measurableSet_Ico
instance nhdsWithin_Ioi_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ioi b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ioi.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
#align nhds_within_Ioi_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Ioi_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance nhdsWithin_Iio_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iio b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iio.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
#align nhds_within_Iio_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Iio_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance nhdsWithin_uIcc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[[[a, b]]] x) :=
nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated
#align nhds_within_uIcc_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_uIcc_isMeasurablyGenerated
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } :=
(isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd).measurableSet
#align measurable_set_lt' measurableSet_lt'
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } :=
hf.prod_mk hg measurableSet_lt'
#align measurable_set_lt measurableSet_lt
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ} {f g : δ → α}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : NullMeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } μ :=
(hf.prod_mk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_lt'
#align null_measurable_set_lt nullMeasurableSet_lt
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure (α × α)} :
NullMeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } μ :=
measurableSet_lt'.nullMeasurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_le [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ}
{f g : δ → α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
NullMeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } μ :=
(hf.prod_mk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_le'
theorem Set.OrdConnected.measurableSet (h : OrdConnected s) : MeasurableSet s := by
let u := ⋃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), Ioo x y
have huopen : IsOpen u := isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_Ioo
have humeas : MeasurableSet u := huopen.measurableSet
have hfinite : (s \ u).Finite := s.finite_diff_iUnion_Ioo
have : u ⊆ s := iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => iUnion₂_subset fun y hy =>
Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans (h.out hx hy)
rw [← union_diff_cancel this]
exact humeas.union hfinite.measurableSet
#align set.ord_connected.measurable_set Set.OrdConnected.measurableSet
theorem IsPreconnected.measurableSet (h : IsPreconnected s) : MeasurableSet s :=
h.ordConnected.measurableSet
#align is_preconnected.measurable_set IsPreconnected.measurableSet
theorem generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderClosedTopology α] (s t : Set α) :
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ t, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
≤ borel α := by
apply generateFrom_le
borelize α
rintro _ ⟨a, -, b, -, -, rfl⟩
exact measurableSet_Ico
#align generate_from_Ico_mem_le_borel generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → y ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
set S : Set (Set α) := { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel _ _)
letI : MeasurableSpace α := generateFrom S
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio]
refine generateFrom_le (forall_mem_range.2 fun a => ?_)
rcases hd.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top with ⟨t, hts, hc, htd, htb, -⟩
by_cases ha : ∀ b < a, (Ioo b a).Nonempty
· convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (u ∈ t) (_ : l < u) (_ : u ≤ a), Ico l u)
· ext y
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Iio, mem_Ico]
constructor
· intro hy
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) y with ⟨l, hlt, hly⟩
rcases htd.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioo (ha y hy) with ⟨u, hut, hyu, hua⟩
exact ⟨l, hlt, u, hut, hly.trans_lt hyu, hua.le, hly, hyu⟩
· rintro ⟨l, -, u, -, -, hua, -, hyu⟩
exact hyu.trans_le hua
· refine MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun a ha => MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun b hb => ?_
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hab => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨a, hts ha, b, hts hb, hab, mem_singleton _⟩
· simp only [not_forall, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at ha
replace ha : a ∈ s := hIoo ha.choose a ha.choose_spec.fst ha.choose_spec.snd
convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (_ : l < a), Ico l a)
· symm
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, inter_eq_right, subset_def, mem_iUnion,
mem_Ici, mem_Iio]
intro x hx
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) x with ⟨z, hzt, hzx⟩
exact ⟨z, hzt, hzx.trans_lt hx, hzx⟩
· refine .biUnion hc fun x hx => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hlt => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨x, hts hx, a, ha, hlt, mem_singleton _⟩
#align dense.borel_eq_generate_from_Ico_mem_aux Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (by simp) fun x y hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
#align dense.borel_eq_generate_from_Ico_mem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ (l u : α), l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and_iff] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Ico borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → x ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } := by
convert hd.orderDual.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux hbot fun x y hlt he => hIoo y x hlt _
using 2
· ext s
constructor <;> rintro ⟨l, hl, u, hu, hlt, rfl⟩
exacts [⟨u, hu, l, hl, hlt, dual_Ico⟩, ⟨u, hu, l, hl, hlt, dual_Ioc⟩]
· erw [dual_Ioo]
exact he
#align dense.borel_eq_generate_from_Ioc_mem_aux Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux (by simp) fun x y hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
#align dense.borel_eq_generate_from_Ioc_mem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Order.lean | 342 | 347 | theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l u, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } := by |
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and_iff] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes, Floris van Doorn, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
#align_import data.nat.factorial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d012cd09a9b256d870751284dd6a29882b0be105"
/-!
# Factorial and variants
This file defines the factorial, along with the ascending and descending variants.
## Main declarations
* `Nat.factorial`: The factorial.
* `Nat.ascFactorial`: The ascending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from `n` to
`n + k - 1`.
* `Nat.descFactorial`: The descending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from
`n - k + 1` to `n`.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.factorial n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
def factorial : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| succ n => succ n * factorial n
#align nat.factorial Nat.factorial
/-- factorial notation `n!` -/
scoped notation:10000 n "!" => Nat.factorial n
section Factorial
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp] theorem factorial_zero : 0! = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_zero Nat.factorial_zero
theorem factorial_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1)! = (n + 1) * n ! :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_succ Nat.factorial_succ
@[simp] theorem factorial_one : 1! = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_one Nat.factorial_one
@[simp] theorem factorial_two : 2! = 2 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_two Nat.factorial_two
theorem mul_factorial_pred (hn : 0 < n) : n * (n - 1)! = n ! :=
Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hn) ▸ rfl
#align nat.mul_factorial_pred Nat.mul_factorial_pred
theorem factorial_pos : ∀ n, 0 < n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| succ n => Nat.mul_pos (succ_pos _) (factorial_pos n)
#align nat.factorial_pos Nat.factorial_pos
theorem factorial_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : n ! ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (factorial_pos _)
#align nat.factorial_ne_zero Nat.factorial_ne_zero
theorem factorial_dvd_factorial {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ∣ n ! := by
induction' h with n _ ih
· exact Nat.dvd_refl _
· exact Nat.dvd_trans ih (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
#align nat.factorial_dvd_factorial Nat.factorial_dvd_factorial
theorem dvd_factorial : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ n !
| succ _, _, _, h => Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
#align nat.dvd_factorial Nat.dvd_factorial
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem factorial_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ≤ n ! :=
le_of_dvd (factorial_pos _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
#align nat.factorial_le Nat.factorial_le
theorem factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ! * (m + 1) ^ n ≤ (m + n)!
| m, 0 => by simp
| m, n + 1 => by
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (_ + 1), Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial (succ_le_succ (le_add_right _ _))
#align nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
theorem factorial_lt (hn : 0 < n) : n ! < m ! ↔ n < m := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_le.mp fun hmn => Nat.not_le_of_lt h (factorial_le hmn), fun h => ?_⟩
have : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → n ! < (n + 1)! := by
intro k hk
rw [factorial_succ, succ_mul, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos]
exact Nat.mul_pos hk k.factorial_pos
induction' h with k hnk ih generalizing hn
· exact this hn
· exact lt_trans (ih hn) $ this <| lt_trans hn <| lt_of_succ_le hnk
#align nat.factorial_lt Nat.factorial_lt
@[gcongr]
lemma factorial_lt_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : n < m) : n ! < m ! := (factorial_lt hn).mpr h
@[simp] lemma one_lt_factorial : 1 < n ! ↔ 1 < n := factorial_lt Nat.one_pos
#align nat.one_lt_factorial Nat.one_lt_factorial
@[simp]
theorem factorial_eq_one : n ! = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_factorial, h]
apply lt_irrefl
· rintro (_|_|_) <;> rfl
#align nat.factorial_eq_one Nat.factorial_eq_one
theorem factorial_inj (hn : 1 < n) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, congr_arg _⟩
obtain hnm | rfl | hnm := lt_trichotomy n m
· rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
· rfl
rw [← one_lt_factorial, h, one_lt_factorial] at hn
rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
#align nat.factorial_inj Nat.factorial_inj
theorem factorial_inj' (h : 1 < n ∨ 1 < m) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
obtain hn|hm := h
· exact factorial_inj hn
· rw [eq_comm, factorial_inj hm, eq_comm]
theorem self_le_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, n ≤ n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_le _
| k + 1 => Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ (Nat.one_le_of_lt k.factorial_pos)
#align nat.self_le_factorial Nat.self_le_factorial
theorem lt_factorial_self {n : ℕ} (hi : 3 ≤ n) : n < n ! := by
have : 0 < n := by omega
have hn : 1 < pred n := le_pred_of_lt (succ_le_iff.mp hi)
rw [← succ_pred_eq_of_pos ‹0 < n›, factorial_succ]
exact (Nat.lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right (pred n).succ_pos).2
((Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hn (self_le_factorial _)))
#align nat.lt_factorial_self Nat.lt_factorial_self
theorem add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ {i : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (hi : 2 ≤ i) :
i + (n + 1)! < (i + n + 1)! := by
rw [factorial_succ (i + _), Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul]
have := (i + n).self_le_factorial
refine Nat.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ ((Nat.lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right ?_).2 ?_))
(factorial_le ?_) <;> omega
#align nat.add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ Nat.add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ
theorem add_factorial_lt_factorial_add {i n : ℕ} (hi : 2 ≤ i) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
i + n ! < (i + n)! := by
cases hn
· rw [factorial_one]
exact lt_factorial_self (succ_le_succ hi)
exact add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ _ hi
#align nat.add_factorial_lt_factorial_add Nat.add_factorial_lt_factorial_add
theorem add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ (i : ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
i + (n + 1)! ≤ (i + (n + 1))! := by
cases (le_or_lt (2 : ℕ) i)
· rw [← Nat.add_assoc]
apply Nat.le_of_lt
apply add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ
assumption
· match i with
| 0 => simp
| 1 =>
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ (1 + n), Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul, Nat.add_comm 1 n,
Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
exact Nat.mul_pos n.succ_pos n.succ.factorial_pos
| succ (succ n) => contradiction
#align nat.add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ Nat.add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ
theorem add_factorial_le_factorial_add (i : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n1 : 1 ≤ n) : i + n ! ≤ (i + n)! := by
cases' n1 with h
· exact self_le_factorial _
exact add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ i h
#align nat.add_factorial_le_factorial_add Nat.add_factorial_le_factorial_add
theorem factorial_mul_pow_sub_le_factorial {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) : n ! * n ^ (m - n) ≤ m ! := by
calc
_ ≤ n ! * (n + 1) ^ (m - n) := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.pow_le_pow_left n.le_succ _)
_ ≤ _ := by simpa [hnm] using @Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial n (m - n)
#align nat.factorial_mul_pow_sub_le_factorial Nat.factorial_mul_pow_sub_le_factorial
lemma factorial_le_pow : ∀ n, n ! ≤ n ^ n
| 0 => le_refl _
| n + 1 =>
calc
_ ≤ (n + 1) * n ^ n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ n.factorial_le_pow
_ ≤ (n + 1) * (n + 1) ^ n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.pow_le_pow_left n.le_succ _)
_ = _ := by rw [pow_succ']
end Factorial
/-! ### Ascending and descending factorials -/
section AscFactorial
/-- `n.ascFactorial k = n (n + 1) ⋯ (n + k - 1)`. This is closely related to `ascPochhammer`, but
much less general. -/
def ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| k + 1 => (n + k) * ascFactorial n k
#align nat.asc_factorial Nat.ascFactorial
@[simp]
theorem ascFactorial_zero (n : ℕ) : n.ascFactorial 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.asc_factorial_zero Nat.ascFactorial_zero
theorem ascFactorial_succ {n k : ℕ} : n.ascFactorial k.succ = (n + k) * n.ascFactorial k :=
rfl
#align nat.asc_factorial_succ Nat.ascFactorial_succ
theorem zero_ascFactorial : ∀ (k : ℕ), (0 : ℕ).ascFactorial k.succ = 0
| 0 => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, ascFactorial_zero, Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_mul]
| (k+1) => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, zero_ascFactorial k, Nat.mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem one_ascFactorial : ∀ (k : ℕ), (1 : ℕ).ascFactorial k = k.factorial
| 0 => ascFactorial_zero 1
| (k+1) => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, one_ascFactorial k, Nat.add_comm, factorial_succ]
theorem succ_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, n * n.succ.ascFactorial k = (n + k) * n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [Nat.add_zero, ascFactorial_zero, ascFactorial_zero]
| k + 1 => by rw [ascFactorial, Nat.mul_left_comm, succ_ascFactorial n k, ascFactorial, succ_add,
← Nat.add_assoc]
#align nat.succ_asc_factorial Nat.succ_ascFactorial
/-- `(n + 1).ascFactorial k = (n + k) ! / n !` but without ℕ-division. See
`Nat.ascFactorial_eq_div` for the version with ℕ-division. -/
theorem factorial_mul_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ k, n ! * (n + 1).ascFactorial k = (n + k)!
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.add_zero, Nat.mul_one]
| k + 1 => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, ← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (n + 1 + k),
← Nat.mul_assoc, factorial_mul_ascFactorial n k, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.add_right_comm]
#align nat.factorial_mul_asc_factorial Nat.factorial_mul_ascFactorial
/-- `n.ascFactorial k = (n + k - 1)! / (n - 1)!` for `n > 0` but without ℕ-division. See
`Nat.ascFactorial_eq_div` for the version with ℕ-division. Consider using
`factorial_mul_ascFactorial` to avoid complications of ℕ-subtraction. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorial/Basic.lean | 256 | 260 | theorem factorial_mul_ascFactorial' (n k : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) :
(n - 1) ! * n.ascFactorial k = (n + k - 1)! := by |
rw [Nat.sub_add_comm h, Nat.sub_one]
nth_rw 2 [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq h rfl]
rw [Nat.sub_one, factorial_mul_ascFactorial]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.