Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shing Tak Lam, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Derivation
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.pderiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Partial derivatives of polynomials
This file defines the notion of the formal *partial derivative* of a polynomial,
the derivative with respect to a single variable.
This derivative is not connected to the notion of derivative from analysis.
It is based purely on the polynomial exponents and coefficients.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.pderiv i p` : the partial derivative of `p` with respect to `i`, as a bundled
derivation of `MvPolynomial σ R`.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommRing R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v
namespace MvPolynomial
open Set Function Finsupp
variable {R : Type u} {σ : Type v} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section PDeriv
variable [CommSemiring R]
/-- `pderiv i p` is the partial derivative of `p` with respect to `i` -/
def pderiv (i : σ) : Derivation R (MvPolynomial σ R) (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
mkDerivation R <| Pi.single i 1
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv MvPolynomial.pderiv
theorem pderiv_def [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) : pderiv i = mkDerivation R (Pi.single i 1) := by
unfold pderiv; congr!
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_def MvPolynomial.pderiv_def
@[simp]
theorem pderiv_monomial {i : σ} :
pderiv i (monomial s a) = monomial (s - single i 1) (a * s i) := by
classical
simp only [pderiv_def, mkDerivation_monomial, Finsupp.smul_sum, smul_eq_mul, ← smul_mul_assoc,
← (monomial _).map_smul]
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single i (fun j _ hne => ?_) fun hi => ?_).trans ?_
· simp [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hne]
· rw [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff] at hi; simp [hi]
· simp
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_monomial MvPolynomial.pderiv_monomial
theorem pderiv_C {i : σ} : pderiv i (C a) = 0 :=
derivation_C _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_C MvPolynomial.pderiv_C
theorem pderiv_one {i : σ} : pderiv i (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := pderiv_C
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_one MvPolynomial.pderiv_one
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/PDeriv.lean | 89 | 91 | theorem pderiv_X [DecidableEq σ] (i j : σ) :
pderiv i (X j : MvPolynomial σ R) = Pi.single (f := fun j => _) i 1 j := by |
rw [pderiv_def, mkDerivation_X]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
#align_import linear_algebra.linear_pmap from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8b981918a93bc45a8600de608cde7944a80d92b9"
/-!
# Partially defined linear maps
A `LinearPMap R E F` or `E →ₗ.[R] F` is a linear map from a submodule of `E` to `F`.
We define a `SemilatticeInf` with `OrderBot` instance on this, and define three operations:
* `mkSpanSingleton` defines a partial linear map defined on the span of a singleton.
* `sup` takes two partial linear maps `f`, `g` that agree on the intersection of their
domains, and returns the unique partial linear map on `f.domain ⊔ g.domain` that
extends both `f` and `g`.
* `sSup` takes a `DirectedOn (· ≤ ·)` set of partial linear maps, and returns the unique
partial linear map on the `sSup` of their domains that extends all these maps.
Moreover, we define
* `LinearPMap.graph` is the graph of the partial linear map viewed as a submodule of `E × F`.
Partially defined maps are currently used in `Mathlib` to prove Hahn-Banach theorem
and its variations. Namely, `LinearPMap.sSup` implies that every chain of `LinearPMap`s
is bounded above.
They are also the basis for the theory of unbounded operators.
-/
universe u v w
/-- A `LinearPMap R E F` or `E →ₗ.[R] F` is a linear map from a submodule of `E` to `F`. -/
structure LinearPMap (R : Type u) [Ring R] (E : Type v) [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E] (F : Type w)
[AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] where
domain : Submodule R E
toFun : domain →ₗ[R] F
#align linear_pmap LinearPMap
@[inherit_doc] notation:25 E " →ₗ.[" R:25 "] " F:0 => LinearPMap R E F
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E] {F : Type*}
[AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
namespace LinearPMap
open Submodule
-- Porting note: A new definition underlying a coercion `↑`.
@[coe]
def toFun' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f.domain → F := f.toFun
instance : CoeFun (E →ₗ.[R] F) fun f : E →ₗ.[R] F => f.domain → F :=
⟨toFun'⟩
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : f.domain) : f.toFun x = f x :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.to_fun_eq_coe LinearPMap.toFun_eq_coe
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.domain = g.domain)
(h' : ∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y) : f = g := by
rcases f with ⟨f_dom, f⟩
rcases g with ⟨g_dom, g⟩
obtain rfl : f_dom = g_dom := h
obtain rfl : f = g := LinearMap.ext fun x => h' rfl
rfl
#align linear_pmap.ext LinearPMap.ext
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f 0 = 0 :=
f.toFun.map_zero
#align linear_pmap.map_zero LinearPMap.map_zero
theorem ext_iff {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} :
f = g ↔
∃ _domain_eq : f.domain = g.domain,
∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y :=
⟨fun EQ =>
EQ ▸
⟨rfl, fun x y h => by
congr
exact mod_cast h⟩,
fun ⟨deq, feq⟩ => ext deq feq⟩
#align linear_pmap.ext_iff LinearPMap.ext_iff
theorem ext' {s : Submodule R E} {f g : s →ₗ[R] F} (h : f = g) : mk s f = mk s g :=
h ▸ rfl
#align linear_pmap.ext' LinearPMap.ext'
theorem map_add (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x y : f.domain) : f (x + y) = f x + f y :=
f.toFun.map_add x y
#align linear_pmap.map_add LinearPMap.map_add
theorem map_neg (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : f.domain) : f (-x) = -f x :=
f.toFun.map_neg x
#align linear_pmap.map_neg LinearPMap.map_neg
theorem map_sub (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x y : f.domain) : f (x - y) = f x - f y :=
f.toFun.map_sub x y
#align linear_pmap.map_sub LinearPMap.map_sub
theorem map_smul (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (c : R) (x : f.domain) : f (c • x) = c • f x :=
f.toFun.map_smul c x
#align linear_pmap.map_smul LinearPMap.map_smul
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (p : Submodule R E) (f : p →ₗ[R] F) (x : p) : mk p f x = f x :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.mk_apply LinearPMap.mk_apply
/-- The unique `LinearPMap` on `R ∙ x` that sends `x` to `y`. This version works for modules
over rings, and requires a proof of `∀ c, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0`. -/
noncomputable def mkSpanSingleton' (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) :
E →ₗ.[R] F where
domain := R ∙ x
toFun :=
have H : ∀ c₁ c₂ : R, c₁ • x = c₂ • x → c₁ • y = c₂ • y := by
intro c₁ c₂ h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_smul] at h ⊢
exact H _ h
{ toFun := fun z => Classical.choose (mem_span_singleton.1 z.prop) • y
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
-- Porting note: Were `Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 _)`.
map_add' := fun y z => by
beta_reduce
rw [← add_smul]
apply H
simp only [add_smul, sub_smul,
fun w : R ∙ x => Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 w.prop)]
apply coe_add
map_smul' := fun c z => by
beta_reduce
rw [smul_smul]
apply H
simp only [mul_smul,
fun w : R ∙ x => Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 w.prop)]
apply coe_smul }
#align linear_pmap.mk_span_singleton' LinearPMap.mkSpanSingleton'
@[simp]
theorem domain_mkSpanSingleton (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) :
(mkSpanSingleton' x y H).domain = R ∙ x :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.domain_mk_span_singleton LinearPMap.domain_mkSpanSingleton
@[simp]
theorem mkSpanSingleton'_apply (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) (c : R) (h) :
mkSpanSingleton' x y H ⟨c • x, h⟩ = c • y := by
dsimp [mkSpanSingleton']
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_smul]
apply H
simp only [sub_smul, one_smul, sub_eq_zero]
apply Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 h)
#align linear_pmap.mk_span_singleton'_apply LinearPMap.mkSpanSingleton'_apply
@[simp]
theorem mkSpanSingleton'_apply_self (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) (h) :
mkSpanSingleton' x y H ⟨x, h⟩ = y := by
-- Porting note: A placeholder should be specified before `convert`.
have := by refine mkSpanSingleton'_apply x y H 1 ?_; rwa [one_smul]
convert this <;> rw [one_smul]
#align linear_pmap.mk_span_singleton'_apply_self LinearPMap.mkSpanSingleton'_apply_self
/-- The unique `LinearPMap` on `span R {x}` that sends a non-zero vector `x` to `y`.
This version works for modules over division rings. -/
noncomputable abbrev mkSpanSingleton {K E F : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E]
[AddCommGroup F] [Module K F] (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ≠ 0) : E →ₗ.[K] F :=
mkSpanSingleton' x y fun c hc =>
(smul_eq_zero.1 hc).elim (fun hc => by rw [hc, zero_smul]) fun hx' => absurd hx' hx
#align linear_pmap.mk_span_singleton LinearPMap.mkSpanSingleton
theorem mkSpanSingleton_apply (K : Type*) {E F : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup E]
[Module K E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module K F] {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : F) :
mkSpanSingleton x y hx ⟨x, (Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x : x ∈ Submodule.span K {x})⟩ =
y :=
LinearPMap.mkSpanSingleton'_apply_self _ _ _ _
#align linear_pmap.mk_span_singleton_apply LinearPMap.mkSpanSingleton_apply
/-- Projection to the first coordinate as a `LinearPMap` -/
protected def fst (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) : E × F →ₗ.[R] E where
domain := p.prod p'
toFun := (LinearMap.fst R E F).comp (p.prod p').subtype
#align linear_pmap.fst LinearPMap.fst
@[simp]
theorem fst_apply (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) (x : p.prod p') :
LinearPMap.fst p p' x = (x : E × F).1 :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.fst_apply LinearPMap.fst_apply
/-- Projection to the second coordinate as a `LinearPMap` -/
protected def snd (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) : E × F →ₗ.[R] F where
domain := p.prod p'
toFun := (LinearMap.snd R E F).comp (p.prod p').subtype
#align linear_pmap.snd LinearPMap.snd
@[simp]
theorem snd_apply (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) (x : p.prod p') :
LinearPMap.snd p p' x = (x : E × F).2 :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.snd_apply LinearPMap.snd_apply
instance le : LE (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g => f.domain ≤ g.domain ∧ ∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y⟩
#align linear_pmap.has_le LinearPMap.le
theorem apply_comp_inclusion {T S : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : T ≤ S) (x : T.domain) :
T x = S (Submodule.inclusion h.1 x) :=
h.2 rfl
#align linear_pmap.apply_comp_of_le LinearPMap.apply_comp_inclusion
theorem exists_of_le {T S : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : T ≤ S) (x : T.domain) :
∃ y : S.domain, (x : E) = y ∧ T x = S y :=
⟨⟨x.1, h.1 x.2⟩, ⟨rfl, h.2 rfl⟩⟩
#align linear_pmap.exists_of_le LinearPMap.exists_of_le
theorem eq_of_le_of_domain_eq {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hle : f ≤ g) (heq : f.domain = g.domain) :
f = g :=
ext heq hle.2
#align linear_pmap.eq_of_le_of_domain_eq LinearPMap.eq_of_le_of_domain_eq
/-- Given two partial linear maps `f`, `g`, the set of points `x` such that
both `f` and `g` are defined at `x` and `f x = g x` form a submodule. -/
def eqLocus (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Submodule R E where
carrier := { x | ∃ (hf : x ∈ f.domain) (hg : x ∈ g.domain), f ⟨x, hf⟩ = g ⟨x, hg⟩ }
zero_mem' := ⟨zero_mem _, zero_mem _, f.map_zero.trans g.map_zero.symm⟩
add_mem' := fun {x y} ⟨hfx, hgx, hx⟩ ⟨hfy, hgy, hy⟩ =>
⟨add_mem hfx hfy, add_mem hgx hgy, by
erw [f.map_add ⟨x, hfx⟩ ⟨y, hfy⟩, g.map_add ⟨x, hgx⟩ ⟨y, hgy⟩, hx, hy]⟩
-- Porting note: `by rintro` is required, or error of a free variable happens.
smul_mem' := by
rintro c x ⟨hfx, hgx, hx⟩
exact
⟨smul_mem _ c hfx, smul_mem _ c hgx,
by erw [f.map_smul c ⟨x, hfx⟩, g.map_smul c ⟨x, hgx⟩, hx]⟩
#align linear_pmap.eq_locus LinearPMap.eqLocus
instance inf : Inf (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f.eqLocus g, f.toFun.comp <| inclusion fun _x hx => hx.fst⟩⟩
#align linear_pmap.has_inf LinearPMap.inf
instance bot : Bot (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨⟨⊥, 0⟩⟩
#align linear_pmap.has_bot LinearPMap.bot
instance inhabited : Inhabited (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨⊥⟩
#align linear_pmap.inhabited LinearPMap.inhabited
instance semilatticeInf : SemilatticeInf (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl f := ⟨le_refl f.domain, fun x y h => Subtype.eq h ▸ rfl⟩
le_trans := fun f g h ⟨fg_le, fg_eq⟩ ⟨gh_le, gh_eq⟩ =>
⟨le_trans fg_le gh_le, fun x z hxz =>
have hxy : (x : E) = inclusion fg_le x := rfl
(fg_eq hxy).trans (gh_eq <| hxy.symm.trans hxz)⟩
le_antisymm f g fg gf := eq_of_le_of_domain_eq fg (le_antisymm fg.1 gf.1)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
-- Porting note: `by rintro` is required, or error of a metavariable happens.
le_inf := by
rintro f g h ⟨fg_le, fg_eq⟩ ⟨fh_le, fh_eq⟩
exact ⟨fun x hx =>
⟨fg_le hx, fh_le hx, by
-- Porting note: `[exact ⟨x, hx⟩, rfl, rfl]` → `[skip, exact ⟨x, hx⟩, skip] <;> rfl`
convert (fg_eq _).symm.trans (fh_eq _) <;> [skip; exact ⟨x, hx⟩; skip] <;> rfl⟩,
fun x ⟨y, yg, hy⟩ h => by
apply fg_eq
exact h⟩
inf_le_left f g := ⟨fun x hx => hx.fst, fun x y h => congr_arg f <| Subtype.eq <| h⟩
inf_le_right f g :=
⟨fun x hx => hx.snd.fst, fun ⟨x, xf, xg, hx⟩ y h => hx.trans <| congr_arg g <| Subtype.eq <| h⟩
#align linear_pmap.semilattice_inf LinearPMap.semilatticeInf
instance orderBot : OrderBot (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le f :=
⟨bot_le, fun x y h => by
have hx : x = 0 := Subtype.eq ((mem_bot R).1 x.2)
have hy : y = 0 := Subtype.eq (h.symm.trans (congr_arg _ hx))
rw [hx, hy, map_zero, map_zero]⟩
#align linear_pmap.order_bot LinearPMap.orderBot
theorem le_of_eqLocus_ge {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (H : f.domain ≤ f.eqLocus g) : f ≤ g :=
suffices f ≤ f ⊓ g from le_trans this inf_le_right
⟨H, fun _x _y hxy => ((inf_le_left : f ⊓ g ≤ f).2 hxy.symm).symm⟩
#align linear_pmap.le_of_eq_locus_ge LinearPMap.le_of_eqLocus_ge
theorem domain_mono : StrictMono (@domain R _ E _ _ F _ _) := fun _f _g hlt =>
lt_of_le_of_ne hlt.1.1 fun heq => ne_of_lt hlt <| eq_of_le_of_domain_eq (le_of_lt hlt) heq
#align linear_pmap.domain_mono LinearPMap.domain_mono
private theorem sup_aux (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) :
∃ fg : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain) →ₗ[R] F,
∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain) (z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain)),
(x : E) + y = ↑z → fg z = f x + g y := by
choose x hx y hy hxy using fun z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain) => mem_sup.1 z.prop
set fg := fun z => f ⟨x z, hx z⟩ + g ⟨y z, hy z⟩
have fg_eq : ∀ (x' : f.domain) (y' : g.domain) (z' : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain))
(_H : (x' : E) + y' = z'), fg z' = f x' + g y' := by
intro x' y' z' H
dsimp [fg]
rw [add_comm, ← sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add, eq_comm, ← map_sub, ← map_sub]
apply h
simp only [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hxy
simp only [AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, coe_mk, coe_mk, hxy, ← sub_add, ← sub_sub, sub_self,
zero_sub, ← H]
apply neg_add_eq_sub
use { toFun := fg, map_add' := ?_, map_smul' := ?_ }, fg_eq
· rintro ⟨z₁, hz₁⟩ ⟨z₂, hz₂⟩
rw [← add_assoc, add_right_comm (f _), ← map_add, add_assoc, ← map_add]
apply fg_eq
simp only [coe_add, coe_mk, ← add_assoc]
rw [add_right_comm (x _), hxy, add_assoc, hxy, coe_mk, coe_mk]
· intro c z
rw [smul_add, ← map_smul, ← map_smul]
apply fg_eq
simp only [coe_smul, coe_mk, ← smul_add, hxy, RingHom.id_apply]
/-- Given two partial linear maps that agree on the intersection of their domains,
`f.sup g h` is the unique partial linear map on `f.domain ⊔ g.domain` that agrees
with `f` and `g`. -/
protected noncomputable def sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨_, Classical.choose (sup_aux f g h)⟩
#align linear_pmap.sup LinearPMap.sup
@[simp]
theorem domain_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) :
(f.sup g h).domain = f.domain ⊔ g.domain :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.domain_sup LinearPMap.domain_sup
theorem sup_apply {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (H : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y)
(x : f.domain) (y : g.domain) (z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain)) (hz : (↑x : E) + ↑y = ↑z) :
f.sup g H z = f x + g y :=
Classical.choose_spec (sup_aux f g H) x y z hz
#align linear_pmap.sup_apply LinearPMap.sup_apply
protected theorem left_le_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : f ≤ f.sup g h := by
refine ⟨le_sup_left, fun z₁ z₂ hz => ?_⟩
rw [← add_zero (f _), ← g.map_zero]
refine (sup_apply h _ _ _ ?_).symm
simpa
#align linear_pmap.left_le_sup LinearPMap.left_le_sup
protected theorem right_le_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : g ≤ f.sup g h := by
refine ⟨le_sup_right, fun z₁ z₂ hz => ?_⟩
rw [← zero_add (g _), ← f.map_zero]
refine (sup_apply h _ _ _ ?_).symm
simpa
#align linear_pmap.right_le_sup LinearPMap.right_le_sup
protected theorem sup_le {f g h : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(H : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) (fh : f ≤ h) (gh : g ≤ h) :
f.sup g H ≤ h :=
have Hf : f ≤ f.sup g H ⊓ h := le_inf (f.left_le_sup g H) fh
have Hg : g ≤ f.sup g H ⊓ h := le_inf (f.right_le_sup g H) gh
le_of_eqLocus_ge <| sup_le Hf.1 Hg.1
#align linear_pmap.sup_le LinearPMap.sup_le
/-- Hypothesis for `LinearPMap.sup` holds, if `f.domain` is disjoint with `g.domain`. -/
theorem sup_h_of_disjoint (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (h : Disjoint f.domain g.domain) (x : f.domain)
(y : g.domain) (hxy : (x : E) = y) : f x = g y := by
rw [disjoint_def] at h
have hy : y = 0 := Subtype.eq (h y (hxy ▸ x.2) y.2)
have hx : x = 0 := Subtype.eq (hxy.trans <| congr_arg _ hy)
simp [*]
#align linear_pmap.sup_h_of_disjoint LinearPMap.sup_h_of_disjoint
/-! ### Algebraic operations -/
section Zero
instance instZero : Zero (E →ₗ.[R] F) := ⟨⊤, 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_domain : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F).domain = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : (⊤ : Submodule R E)) : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F) x = 0 := rfl
end Zero
section SMul
variable {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M F] [SMulCommClass R M F]
variable [Monoid N] [DistribMulAction N F] [SMulCommClass R N F]
instance instSMul : SMul M (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a f =>
{ domain := f.domain
toFun := a • f.toFun }⟩
#align linear_pmap.has_smul LinearPMap.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem smul_domain (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (a • f).domain = f.domain :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.smul_domain LinearPMap.smul_domain
theorem smul_apply (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (a • f).domain) : (a • f) x = a • f x :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.smul_apply LinearPMap.smul_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : ⇑(a • f) = a • ⇑f :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.coe_smul LinearPMap.coe_smul
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass M N F] : SMulCommClass M N (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext' <| smul_comm a b f.toFun⟩
#align linear_pmap.smul_comm_class LinearPMap.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul M N] [IsScalarTower M N F] : IsScalarTower M N (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext' <| smul_assoc a b f.toFun⟩
#align linear_pmap.is_scalar_tower LinearPMap.instIsScalarTower
instance instMulAction : MulAction M (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul := fun ⟨_s, f⟩ => ext' <| one_smul M f
mul_smul a b f := ext' <| mul_smul a b f.toFun
#align linear_pmap.mul_action LinearPMap.instMulAction
end SMul
instance instNeg : Neg (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f.domain, -f.toFun⟩⟩
#align linear_pmap.has_neg LinearPMap.instNeg
@[simp]
theorem neg_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (-f).domain = f.domain := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x) : (-f) x = -f x :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.neg_apply LinearPMap.neg_apply
instance instInvolutiveNeg : InvolutiveNeg (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· rfl
· simp only [neg_apply, neg_neg]
cases x
congr⟩
section Add
instance instAdd : Add (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := f.domain ⊓ g.domain
toFun := f.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_left : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _))
+ g.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_right : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _)) }⟩
theorem add_domain (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f + g).domain = f.domain ⊓ g.domain := rfl
theorem add_apply (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f.domain ⊓ g.domain : Submodule R E)) :
(f + g) x = f ⟨x, x.prop.1⟩ + g ⟨x, x.prop.2⟩ := rfl
instance instAddSemigroup : AddSemigroup (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g h => by
ext x y hxy
· simp only [add_domain, inf_assoc]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, add_assoc]⟩
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· simp [add_domain]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, zero_apply, zero_add],
fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· simp [add_domain]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, zero_apply, add_zero]⟩
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
zero_add f := by
simp
add_zero := by
simp
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g => by
ext x y hxy
· simp only [add_domain, inf_comm]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, add_comm]⟩
end Add
section VAdd
instance instVAdd : VAdd (E →ₗ[R] F) (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := g.domain
toFun := f.comp g.domain.subtype + g.toFun }⟩
#align linear_pmap.has_vadd LinearPMap.instVAdd
@[simp]
theorem vadd_domain (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f +ᵥ g).domain = g.domain :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.vadd_domain LinearPMap.vadd_domain
theorem vadd_apply (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f +ᵥ g).domain) :
(f +ᵥ g) x = f x + g x :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.vadd_apply LinearPMap.vadd_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_vadd (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : ⇑(f +ᵥ g) = ⇑(f.comp g.domain.subtype) + ⇑g :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.coe_vadd LinearPMap.coe_vadd
instance instAddAction : AddAction (E →ₗ[R] F) (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
vadd := (· +ᵥ ·)
zero_vadd := fun ⟨_s, _f⟩ => ext' <| zero_add _
add_vadd := fun _f₁ _f₂ ⟨_s, _g⟩ => ext' <| LinearMap.ext fun _x => add_assoc _ _ _
#align linear_pmap.add_action LinearPMap.instAddAction
end VAdd
section Sub
instance instSub : Sub (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := f.domain ⊓ g.domain
toFun := f.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_left : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _))
- g.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_right : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _)) }⟩
theorem sub_domain (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f - g).domain = f.domain ⊓ g.domain := rfl
theorem sub_apply (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f.domain ⊓ g.domain : Submodule R E)) :
(f - g) x = f ⟨x, x.prop.1⟩ - g ⟨x, x.prop.2⟩ := rfl
instance instSubtractionCommMonoid : SubtractionCommMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
add_comm := add_comm
sub_eq_add_neg f g := by
ext x y h
· rfl
simp [sub_apply, add_apply, neg_apply, ← sub_eq_add_neg, h]
neg_neg := neg_neg
neg_add_rev f g := by
ext x y h
· simp [add_domain, sub_domain, neg_domain, And.comm]
simp [sub_apply, add_apply, neg_apply, ← sub_eq_add_neg, h]
neg_eq_of_add f g h' := by
ext x y h
· have : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F).domain = ⊤ := zero_domain
simp only [← h', add_domain, ge_iff_le, inf_eq_top_iff] at this
rw [neg_domain, this.1, this.2]
simp only [inf_coe, neg_domain, Eq.ndrec, Int.ofNat_eq_coe, neg_apply]
rw [ext_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨hdom, h'⟩
rw [zero_domain] at hdom
simp only [inf_coe, neg_domain, Eq.ndrec, Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zero_domain, top_coe, zero_apply,
Subtype.forall, mem_top, forall_true_left, forall_eq'] at h'
specialize h' x.1 (by simp [hdom])
simp only [inf_coe, neg_domain, Eq.ndrec, Int.ofNat_eq_coe, add_apply, Subtype.coe_eta,
← neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero] at h'
rw [h', h]
zsmul := zsmulRec
end Sub
section
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [Module K E] [Module K F]
/-- Extend a `LinearPMap` to `f.domain ⊔ K ∙ x`. -/
noncomputable def supSpanSingleton (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) :
E →ₗ.[K] F :=
-- Porting note: `simpa [..]` → `simp [..]; exact ..`
f.sup (mkSpanSingleton x y fun h₀ => hx <| h₀.symm ▸ f.domain.zero_mem) <|
sup_h_of_disjoint _ _ <| by simp [disjoint_span_singleton]; exact fun h => False.elim <| hx h
#align linear_pmap.sup_span_singleton LinearPMap.supSpanSingleton
@[simp]
theorem domain_supSpanSingleton (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) :
(f.supSpanSingleton x y hx).domain = f.domain ⊔ K ∙ x :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.domain_sup_span_singleton LinearPMap.domain_supSpanSingleton
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: Left-hand side does not simplify.
theorem supSpanSingleton_apply_mk (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) (x' : E)
(hx' : x' ∈ f.domain) (c : K) :
f.supSpanSingleton x y hx
⟨x' + c • x, mem_sup.2 ⟨x', hx', _, mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩ =
f ⟨x', hx'⟩ + c • y := by
-- Porting note: `erw [..]; rfl; exact ..` → `erw [..]; exact ..; rfl`
-- That is, the order of the side goals generated by `erw` changed.
erw [sup_apply _ ⟨x', hx'⟩ ⟨c • x, _⟩, mkSpanSingleton'_apply]
· exact mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩
· rfl
#align linear_pmap.sup_span_singleton_apply_mk LinearPMap.supSpanSingleton_apply_mk
end
private theorem sSup_aux (c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)) (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) :
∃ f : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)) →ₗ[R] F, (⟨_, f⟩ : E →ₗ.[R] F) ∈ upperBounds c := by
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ceq | cne
· subst c
simp
have hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) (domain '' c) :=
directedOn_image.2 (hc.mono @(domain_mono.monotone))
have P : ∀ x : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)), { p : c // (x : E) ∈ p.val.domain } := by
rintro x
apply Classical.indefiniteDescription
have := (mem_sSup_of_directed (cne.image _) hdir).1 x.2
-- Porting note: + `← bex_def`
rwa [Set.exists_mem_image, ← bex_def, SetCoe.exists'] at this
set f : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)) → F := fun x => (P x).val.val ⟨x, (P x).property⟩
have f_eq : ∀ (p : c) (x : ↥(sSup (domain '' c))) (y : p.1.1) (_hxy : (x : E) = y),
f x = p.1 y := by
intro p x y hxy
rcases hc (P x).1.1 (P x).1.2 p.1 p.2 with ⟨q, _hqc, hxq, hpq⟩
-- Porting note: `refine' ..; exacts [inclusion hpq.1 y, hxy, rfl]`
-- → `refine' .. <;> [skip; exact inclusion hpq.1 y; rfl]; exact hxy`
convert (hxq.2 _).trans (hpq.2 _).symm <;> [skip; exact inclusion hpq.1 y; rfl]; exact hxy
use { toFun := f, map_add' := ?_, map_smul' := ?_ }, ?_
· intro x y
rcases hc (P x).1.1 (P x).1.2 (P y).1.1 (P y).1.2 with ⟨p, hpc, hpx, hpy⟩
set x' := inclusion hpx.1 ⟨x, (P x).2⟩
set y' := inclusion hpy.1 ⟨y, (P y).2⟩
rw [f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ x x' rfl, f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ y y' rfl, f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ (x + y) (x' + y') rfl,
map_add]
· intro c x
simp only [RingHom.id_apply]
rw [f_eq (P x).1 (c • x) (c • ⟨x, (P x).2⟩) rfl, ← map_smul]
· intro p hpc
refine ⟨le_sSup <| Set.mem_image_of_mem domain hpc, fun x y hxy => Eq.symm ?_⟩
exact f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ _ _ hxy.symm
protected noncomputable def sSup (c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)) (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨_, Classical.choose <| sSup_aux c hc⟩
#align linear_pmap.Sup LinearPMap.sSup
protected theorem le_sSup {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {f : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hf : f ∈ c) : f ≤ LinearPMap.sSup c hc :=
Classical.choose_spec (sSup_aux c hc) hf
#align linear_pmap.le_Sup LinearPMap.le_sSup
protected theorem sSup_le {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {g : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hg : ∀ f ∈ c, f ≤ g) : LinearPMap.sSup c hc ≤ g :=
le_of_eqLocus_ge <|
sSup_le fun _ ⟨f, hf, Eq⟩ =>
Eq ▸
have : f ≤ LinearPMap.sSup c hc ⊓ g := le_inf (LinearPMap.le_sSup _ hf) (hg f hf)
this.1
#align linear_pmap.Sup_le LinearPMap.sSup_le
protected theorem sSup_apply {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {l : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hl : l ∈ c) (x : l.domain) :
(LinearPMap.sSup c hc) ⟨x, (LinearPMap.le_sSup hc hl).1 x.2⟩ = l x := by
symm
apply (Classical.choose_spec (sSup_aux c hc) hl).2
rfl
#align linear_pmap.Sup_apply LinearPMap.sSup_apply
end LinearPMap
namespace LinearMap
/-- Restrict a linear map to a submodule, reinterpreting the result as a `LinearPMap`. -/
def toPMap (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨p, f.comp p.subtype⟩
#align linear_map.to_pmap LinearMap.toPMap
@[simp]
theorem toPMap_apply (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) (x : p) : f.toPMap p x = f x :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_pmap_apply LinearMap.toPMap_apply
@[simp]
theorem toPMap_domain (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) : (f.toPMap p).domain = p :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_pmap_domain LinearMap.toPMap_domain
/-- Compose a linear map with a `LinearPMap` -/
def compPMap (g : F →ₗ[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : E →ₗ.[R] G where
domain := f.domain
toFun := g.comp f.toFun
#align linear_map.comp_pmap LinearMap.compPMap
@[simp]
theorem compPMap_apply (g : F →ₗ[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x) : g.compPMap f x = g (f x) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.comp_pmap_apply LinearMap.compPMap_apply
end LinearMap
namespace LinearPMap
/-- Restrict codomain of a `LinearPMap` -/
def codRestrict (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (p : Submodule R F) (H : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) : E →ₗ.[R] p where
domain := f.domain
toFun := f.toFun.codRestrict p H
#align linear_pmap.cod_restrict LinearPMap.codRestrict
/-- Compose two `LinearPMap`s -/
def comp (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (H : ∀ x : f.domain, f x ∈ g.domain) : E →ₗ.[R] G :=
g.toFun.compPMap <| f.codRestrict _ H
#align linear_pmap.comp LinearPMap.comp
/-- `f.coprod g` is the partially defined linear map defined on `f.domain × g.domain`,
and sending `p` to `f p.1 + g p.2`. -/
def coprod (f : E →ₗ.[R] G) (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) : E × F →ₗ.[R] G where
domain := f.domain.prod g.domain
toFun :=
-- Porting note: This is just
-- `(f.comp (LinearPMap.fst f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.1).toFun +`
-- ` (g.comp (LinearPMap.snd f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.2).toFun`,
HAdd.hAdd
(α := f.domain.prod g.domain →ₗ[R] G)
(β := f.domain.prod g.domain →ₗ[R] G)
(f.comp (LinearPMap.fst f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.1).toFun
(g.comp (LinearPMap.snd f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.2).toFun
#align linear_pmap.coprod LinearPMap.coprod
@[simp]
theorem coprod_apply (f : E →ₗ.[R] G) (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) (x) :
f.coprod g x = f ⟨(x : E × F).1, x.2.1⟩ + g ⟨(x : E × F).2, x.2.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.coprod_apply LinearPMap.coprod_apply
/-- Restrict a partially defined linear map to a submodule of `E` contained in `f.domain`. -/
def domRestrict (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (S : Submodule R E) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨S ⊓ f.domain, f.toFun.comp (Submodule.inclusion (by simp))⟩
#align linear_pmap.dom_restrict LinearPMap.domRestrict
@[simp]
theorem domRestrict_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {S : Submodule R E} :
(f.domRestrict S).domain = S ⊓ f.domain :=
rfl
#align linear_pmap.dom_restrict_domain LinearPMap.domRestrict_domain
theorem domRestrict_apply {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {S : Submodule R E} ⦃x : ↥(S ⊓ f.domain)⦄ ⦃y : f.domain⦄
(h : (x : E) = y) : f.domRestrict S x = f y := by
have : Submodule.inclusion (by simp) x = y := by
ext
simp [h]
rw [← this]
exact LinearPMap.mk_apply _ _ _
#align linear_pmap.dom_restrict_apply LinearPMap.domRestrict_apply
theorem domRestrict_le {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {S : Submodule R E} : f.domRestrict S ≤ f :=
⟨by simp, fun x y hxy => domRestrict_apply hxy⟩
#align linear_pmap.dom_restrict_le LinearPMap.domRestrict_le
/-! ### Graph -/
section Graph
/-- The graph of a `LinearPMap` viewed as a submodule on `E × F`. -/
def graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Submodule R (E × F) :=
f.toFun.graph.map (f.domain.subtype.prodMap (LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))
#align linear_pmap.graph LinearPMap.graph
theorem mem_graph_iff' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E × F} :
x ∈ f.graph ↔ ∃ y : f.domain, (↑y, f y) = x := by simp [graph]
#align linear_pmap.mem_graph_iff' LinearPMap.mem_graph_iff'
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E × F} :
x ∈ f.graph ↔ ∃ y : f.domain, (↑y : E) = x.1 ∧ f y = x.2 := by
cases x
simp_rw [mem_graph_iff', Prod.mk.inj_iff]
#align linear_pmap.mem_graph_iff LinearPMap.mem_graph_iff
/-- The tuple `(x, f x)` is contained in the graph of `f`. -/
theorem mem_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : domain f) : ((x : E), f x) ∈ f.graph := by simp
#align linear_pmap.mem_graph LinearPMap.mem_graph
theorem graph_map_fst_eq_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
f.graph.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) = f.domain := by
ext x
simp only [Submodule.mem_map, mem_graph_iff, Subtype.exists, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left,
LinearMap.fst_apply, Prod.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨x, hx, _⟩
exact hx
· use f ⟨x, h⟩
simp only [h, exists_const]
theorem graph_map_snd_eq_range (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
f.graph.map (LinearMap.snd R E F) = LinearMap.range f.toFun := by ext; simp
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M F] [SMulCommClass R M F] (y : M)
/-- The graph of `z • f` as a pushforward. -/
theorem smul_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (z : M) :
(z • f).graph =
f.graph.map ((LinearMap.id : E →ₗ[R] E).prodMap (z • (LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))) := by
ext x; cases' x with x_fst x_snd
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [LinearPMap.smul_apply] at h
rw [Submodule.mem_map]
simp only [mem_graph_iff, LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id,
LinearMap.smul_apply, Prod.mk.inj_iff, Prod.exists, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
use x_fst, y, hy
rw [Submodule.mem_map] at h
rcases h with ⟨x', hx', h⟩
cases x'
simp only [LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id, LinearMap.smul_apply,
Prod.mk.inj_iff] at h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx' ⊢
rcases hx' with ⟨y, hy, hx'⟩
use y
rw [← h.1, ← h.2]
simp [hy, hx']
#align linear_pmap.smul_graph LinearPMap.smul_graph
/-- The graph of `-f` as a pushforward. -/
theorem neg_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
(-f).graph =
f.graph.map ((LinearMap.id : E →ₗ[R] E).prodMap (-(LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))) := by
ext x; cases' x with x_fst x_snd
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [LinearPMap.neg_apply] at h
rw [Submodule.mem_map]
simp only [mem_graph_iff, LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id,
LinearMap.neg_apply, Prod.mk.inj_iff, Prod.exists, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
use x_fst, y, hy
rw [Submodule.mem_map] at h
rcases h with ⟨x', hx', h⟩
cases x'
simp only [LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id, LinearMap.neg_apply,
Prod.mk.inj_iff] at h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx' ⊢
rcases hx' with ⟨y, hy, hx'⟩
use y
rw [← h.1, ← h.2]
simp [hy, hx']
#align linear_pmap.neg_graph LinearPMap.neg_graph
theorem mem_graph_snd_inj (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x y : E} {x' y' : F} (hx : (x, x') ∈ f.graph)
(hy : (y, y') ∈ f.graph) (hxy : x = y) : x' = y' := by
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx hy
rcases hx with ⟨x'', hx1, hx2⟩
rcases hy with ⟨y'', hy1, hy2⟩
simp only at hx1 hx2 hy1 hy2
rw [← hx1, ← hy1, SetLike.coe_eq_coe] at hxy
rw [← hx2, ← hy2, hxy]
#align linear_pmap.mem_graph_snd_inj LinearPMap.mem_graph_snd_inj
theorem mem_graph_snd_inj' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x y : E × F} (hx : x ∈ f.graph) (hy : y ∈ f.graph)
(hxy : x.1 = y.1) : x.2 = y.2 := by
cases x
cases y
exact f.mem_graph_snd_inj hx hy hxy
#align linear_pmap.mem_graph_snd_inj' LinearPMap.mem_graph_snd_inj'
/-- The property that `f 0 = 0` in terms of the graph. -/
theorem graph_fst_eq_zero_snd (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E} {x' : F} (h : (x, x') ∈ f.graph)
(hx : x = 0) : x' = 0 :=
f.mem_graph_snd_inj h f.graph.zero_mem hx
#align linear_pmap.graph_fst_eq_zero_snd LinearPMap.graph_fst_eq_zero_snd
theorem mem_domain_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} : x ∈ f.domain ↔ ∃ y : F, (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
constructor <;> intro h
· use f ⟨x, h⟩
exact f.mem_graph ⟨x, h⟩
cases' h with y h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
cases' h with x' h
simp only at h
rw [← h.1]
simp
#align linear_pmap.mem_domain_iff LinearPMap.mem_domain_iff
theorem mem_domain_of_mem_graph {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} {y : F} (h : (x, y) ∈ f.graph) :
x ∈ f.domain := by
rw [mem_domain_iff]
exact ⟨y, h⟩
#align linear_pmap.mem_domain_of_mem_graph LinearPMap.mem_domain_of_mem_graph
theorem image_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} {y : F} (hx : x ∈ f.domain) :
y = f ⟨x, hx⟩ ↔ (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
rw [mem_graph_iff]
constructor <;> intro h
· use ⟨x, hx⟩
simp [h]
rcases h with ⟨⟨x', hx'⟩, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk] at h1 h2
simp only [← h2, h1]
#align linear_pmap.image_iff LinearPMap.image_iff
theorem mem_range_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {y : F} : y ∈ Set.range f ↔ ∃ x : E, (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [Set.mem_range] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, h⟩
use x
rw [← h]
exact f.mem_graph ⟨x, hx⟩
cases' h with x h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
cases' h with x h
rw [Set.mem_range]
use x
simp only at h
rw [h.2]
#align linear_pmap.mem_range_iff LinearPMap.mem_range_iff
theorem mem_domain_iff_of_eq_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph = g.graph) {x : E} :
x ∈ f.domain ↔ x ∈ g.domain := by simp_rw [mem_domain_iff, h]
#align linear_pmap.mem_domain_iff_of_eq_graph LinearPMap.mem_domain_iff_of_eq_graph
theorem le_of_le_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph ≤ g.graph) : f ≤ g := by
constructor
· intro x hx
rw [mem_domain_iff] at hx ⊢
cases' hx with y hx
use y
exact h hx
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
rw [image_iff]
refine h ?_
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk] at hxy
rw [hxy] at hx
rw [← image_iff hx]
simp [hxy]
#align linear_pmap.le_of_le_graph LinearPMap.le_of_le_graph
theorem le_graph_of_le {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f ≤ g) : f.graph ≤ g.graph := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx ⊢
cases' hx with y hx
use ⟨y, h.1 y.2⟩
simp only [hx, Submodule.coe_mk, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
convert hx.2 using 1
refine (h.2 ?_).symm
simp only [hx.1, Submodule.coe_mk]
#align linear_pmap.le_graph_of_le LinearPMap.le_graph_of_le
theorem le_graph_iff {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} : f.graph ≤ g.graph ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨le_of_le_graph, le_graph_of_le⟩
#align linear_pmap.le_graph_iff LinearPMap.le_graph_iff
theorem eq_of_eq_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph = g.graph) : f = g := by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine ext ..`
refine ext (Submodule.ext fun x => ?_) (fun x y h' => ?_)
· exact mem_domain_iff_of_eq_graph h
· exact (le_of_le_graph h.le).2 h'
#align linear_pmap.eq_of_eq_graph LinearPMap.eq_of_eq_graph
end Graph
end LinearPMap
namespace Submodule
section SubmoduleToLinearPMap
theorem existsUnique_from_graph {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ {x : E × F} (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) {a : E}
(ha : a ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : ∃! b : F, (a, b) ∈ g := by
refine exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique ?_ ?_
· convert ha
simp
intro y₁ y₂ hy₁ hy₂
have hy : ((0 : E), y₁ - y₂) ∈ g := by
convert g.sub_mem hy₁ hy₂
exact (sub_self _).symm
exact sub_eq_zero.mp (hg hy (by simp))
#align submodule.exists_unique_from_graph Submodule.existsUnique_from_graph
/-- Auxiliary definition to unfold the existential quantifier. -/
noncomputable def valFromGraph {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) {a : E}
(ha : a ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : F :=
(ExistsUnique.exists (existsUnique_from_graph @hg ha)).choose
#align submodule.val_from_graph Submodule.valFromGraph
theorem valFromGraph_mem {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) {a : E}
(ha : a ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : (a, valFromGraph hg ha) ∈ g :=
(ExistsUnique.exists (existsUnique_from_graph @hg ha)).choose_spec
#align submodule.val_from_graph_mem Submodule.valFromGraph_mem
/-- Define a `LinearMap` from its graph.
Helper definition for `LinearPMap`. -/
noncomputable def toLinearPMapAux (g : Submodule R (E × F))
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) :
g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) →ₗ[R] F where
toFun := fun x => valFromGraph hg x.2
map_add' := fun v w => by
have hadd := (g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)).add_mem v.2 w.2
have hvw := valFromGraph_mem hg hadd
have hvw' := g.add_mem (valFromGraph_mem hg v.2) (valFromGraph_mem hg w.2)
rw [Prod.mk_add_mk] at hvw'
exact (existsUnique_from_graph @hg hadd).unique hvw hvw'
map_smul' := fun a v => by
have hsmul := (g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)).smul_mem a v.2
have hav := valFromGraph_mem hg hsmul
have hav' := g.smul_mem a (valFromGraph_mem hg v.2)
rw [Prod.smul_mk] at hav'
exact (existsUnique_from_graph @hg hsmul).unique hav hav'
open scoped Classical in
/-- Define a `LinearPMap` from its graph.
In the case that the submodule is not a graph of a `LinearPMap` then the underlying linear map
is just the zero map. -/
noncomputable def toLinearPMap (g : Submodule R (E × F)) : E →ₗ.[R] F where
domain := g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)
toFun := if hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0 then
g.toLinearPMapAux hg else 0
#align submodule.to_linear_pmap Submodule.toLinearPMap
theorem toLinearPMap_domain (g : Submodule R (E × F)) :
g.toLinearPMap.domain = g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) := rfl
theorem toLinearPMap_apply_aux {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0)
(x : g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) :
g.toLinearPMap x = valFromGraph hg x.2 := by
classical
change (if hg : _ then g.toLinearPMapAux hg else 0) x = _
rw [dif_pos]
· rfl
· exact hg
theorem mem_graph_toLinearPMap {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0)
(x : g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : (x.val, g.toLinearPMap x) ∈ g := by
rw [toLinearPMap_apply_aux hg]
exact valFromGraph_mem hg x.2
#align submodule.mem_graph_to_linear_pmap Submodule.mem_graph_toLinearPMap
@[simp]
theorem toLinearPMap_graph_eq (g : Submodule R (E × F))
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) :
g.toLinearPMap.graph = g := by
ext x
constructor <;> intro hx
· rw [LinearPMap.mem_graph_iff] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hx1, hx2⟩
convert g.mem_graph_toLinearPMap hg y using 1
exact Prod.ext hx1.symm hx2.symm
rw [LinearPMap.mem_graph_iff]
cases' x with x_fst x_snd
have hx_fst : x_fst ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) := by
simp only [mem_map, LinearMap.fst_apply, Prod.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
exact ⟨x_snd, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x_fst, hx_fst⟩, Subtype.coe_mk x_fst hx_fst, ?_⟩
rw [toLinearPMap_apply_aux hg]
exact (existsUnique_from_graph @hg hx_fst).unique (valFromGraph_mem hg hx_fst) hx
#align submodule.to_linear_pmap_graph_eq Submodule.toLinearPMap_graph_eq
theorem toLinearPMap_range (g : Submodule R (E × F))
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) :
LinearMap.range g.toLinearPMap.toFun = g.map (LinearMap.snd R E F) := by
rwa [← LinearPMap.graph_map_snd_eq_range, toLinearPMap_graph_eq]
end SubmoduleToLinearPMap
end Submodule
namespace LinearPMap
section inverse
/-- The inverse of a `LinearPMap`. -/
noncomputable def inverse (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : F →ₗ.[R] E :=
(f.graph.map (LinearEquiv.prodComm R E F)).toLinearPMap
variable {f : E →ₗ.[R] F}
theorem inverse_domain : (inverse f).domain = LinearMap.range f.toFun := by
rw [inverse, Submodule.toLinearPMap_domain, ← graph_map_snd_eq_range,
← LinearEquiv.fst_comp_prodComm, Submodule.map_comp]
rfl
variable (hf : LinearMap.ker f.toFun = ⊥)
/-- The graph of the inverse generates a `LinearPMap`. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/LinearPMap.lean | 1,089 | 1,100 | theorem mem_inverse_graph_snd_eq_zero (x : F × E)
(hv : x ∈ (graph f).map (LinearEquiv.prodComm R E F))
(hv' : x.fst = 0) : x.snd = 0 := by |
simp only [Submodule.mem_map, mem_graph_iff, Subtype.exists, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left,
LinearEquiv.prodComm_apply, Prod.exists, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at hv
rcases hv with ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, h1⟩, ⟨h2, h3⟩⟩
simp only at hv' ⊢
rw [hv'] at h1
rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot'] at hf
specialize hf ⟨a, ha⟩ h1
simp only [Submodule.mk_eq_zero] at hf
exact hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.OpenPos
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.prod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"00abe0695d8767201e6d008afa22393978bb324d"
/-!
# The product measure
In this file we define and prove properties about the binary product measure. If `α` and `β` have
s-finite measures `μ` resp. `ν` then `α × β` can be equipped with a s-finite measure `μ.prod ν` that
satisfies `(μ.prod ν) s = ∫⁻ x, ν {y | (x, y) ∈ s} ∂μ`.
We also have `(μ.prod ν) (s ×ˢ t) = μ s * ν t`, i.e. the measure of a rectangle is the product of
the measures of the sides.
We also prove Tonelli's theorem.
## Main definition
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod`: The product of two measures.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_apply` states `μ.prod ν s = ∫⁻ x, ν {y | (x, y) ∈ s} ∂μ`
for measurable `s`. `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_apply_symm` is the reversed version.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_prod` states `μ.prod ν (s ×ˢ t) = μ s * ν t` for measurable sets
`s` and `t`.
* `MeasureTheory.lintegral_prod`: Tonelli's theorem. It states that for a measurable function
`α × β → ℝ≥0∞` we have `∫⁻ z, f z ∂(μ.prod ν) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ`. The version
for functions `α → β → ℝ≥0∞` is reversed, and called `lintegral_lintegral`. Both versions have
a variant with `_symm` appended, where the order of integration is reversed.
The lemma `Measurable.lintegral_prod_right'` states that the inner integral of the right-hand side
is measurable.
## Implementation Notes
Many results are proven twice, once for functions in curried form (`α → β → γ`) and one for
functions in uncurried form (`α × β → γ`). The former often has an assumption
`Measurable (uncurry f)`, which could be inconvenient to discharge, but for the latter it is more
common that the function has to be given explicitly, since Lean cannot synthesize the function by
itself. We name the lemmas about the uncurried form with a prime.
Tonelli's theorem has a different naming scheme, since the version for the uncurried version is
reversed.
## Tags
product measure, Tonelli's theorem, Fubini-Tonelli theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Function Real ENNReal
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open TopologicalSpace hiding generateFrom
open Filter hiding prod_eq map
variable {α α' β β' γ E : Type*}
/-- Rectangles formed by π-systems form a π-system. -/
theorem IsPiSystem.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsPiSystem C)
(hD : IsPiSystem D) : IsPiSystem (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rintro _ ⟨s₁, hs₁, t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨s₂, hs₂, t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩ hst
rw [prod_inter_prod] at hst ⊢; rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at hst
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hC _ hs₁ _ hs₂ hst.1) (hD _ ht₁ _ ht₂ hst.2)
#align is_pi_system.prod IsPiSystem.prod
/-- Rectangles of countably spanning sets are countably spanning. -/
theorem IsCountablySpanning.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) : IsCountablySpanning (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rcases hC, hD with ⟨⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩, t, h1t, h2t⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n.unpair.1 ×ˢ t n.unpair.2, fun n => mem_image2_of_mem (h1s _) (h1t _), ?_⟩
rw [iUnion_unpair_prod, h2s, h2t, univ_prod_univ]
#align is_countably_spanning.prod IsCountablySpanning.prod
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α'] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β']
variable [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ' : Measure α} {ν ν' : Measure β} {τ : Measure γ}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-! ### Measurability
Before we define the product measure, we can talk about the measurability of operations on binary
functions. We show that if `f` is a binary measurable function, then the function that integrates
along one of the variables (using either the Lebesgue or Bochner integral) is measurable.
-/
/-- The product of generated σ-algebras is the one generated by rectangles, if both generating sets
are countably spanning. -/
theorem generateFrom_prod_eq {α β} {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) :
@Prod.instMeasurableSpace _ _ (generateFrom C) (generateFrom D) =
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine sup_le ?_ ?_ <;> rw [comap_generateFrom] <;> apply generateFrom_le <;>
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
· rcases hD with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← prod_univ, ← h2t, prod_iUnion]
apply MeasurableSet.iUnion
intro n
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
exact ⟨s, hs, t n, h1t n, rfl⟩
· rcases hC with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← univ_prod, ← h2t, iUnion_prod_const]
apply MeasurableSet.iUnion
rintro n
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
exact mem_image2_of_mem (h1t n) hs
· apply generateFrom_le
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
dsimp only
rw [prod_eq]
apply (measurable_fst _).inter (measurable_snd _)
· exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
· exact measurableSet_generateFrom ht
#align generate_from_prod_eq generateFrom_prod_eq
/-- If `C` and `D` generate the σ-algebras on `α` resp. `β`, then rectangles formed by `C` and `D`
generate the σ-algebra on `α × β`. -/
theorem generateFrom_eq_prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : generateFrom C = ‹_›)
(hD : generateFrom D = ‹_›) (h2C : IsCountablySpanning C) (h2D : IsCountablySpanning D) :
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) = Prod.instMeasurableSpace := by
rw [← hC, ← hD, generateFrom_prod_eq h2C h2D]
#align generate_from_eq_prod generateFrom_eq_prod
/-- The product σ-algebra is generated from boxes, i.e. `s ×ˢ t` for sets `s : Set α` and
`t : Set β`. -/
theorem generateFrom_prod :
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } { t : Set β | MeasurableSet t }) =
Prod.instMeasurableSpace :=
generateFrom_eq_prod generateFrom_measurableSet generateFrom_measurableSet
isCountablySpanning_measurableSet isCountablySpanning_measurableSet
#align generate_from_prod generateFrom_prod
/-- Rectangles form a π-system. -/
theorem isPiSystem_prod :
IsPiSystem (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } { t : Set β | MeasurableSet t }) :=
isPiSystem_measurableSet.prod isPiSystem_measurableSet
#align is_pi_system_prod isPiSystem_prod
/-- If `ν` is a finite measure, and `s ⊆ α × β` is measurable, then `x ↦ ν { y | (x, y) ∈ s }` is
a measurable function. `measurable_measure_prod_mk_left` is strictly more general. -/
theorem measurable_measure_prod_mk_left_finite [IsFiniteMeasure ν] {s : Set (α × β)}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) := by
refine induction_on_inter (C := fun s => Measurable fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s))
generateFrom_prod.symm isPiSystem_prod ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hs
· simp
· rintro _ ⟨s, hs, t, _, rfl⟩
simp only [mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, measure_if]
exact measurable_const.indicator hs
· intro t ht h2t
simp_rw [preimage_compl, measure_compl (measurable_prod_mk_left ht) (measure_ne_top ν _)]
exact h2t.const_sub _
· intro f h1f h2f h3f
simp_rw [preimage_iUnion]
have : ∀ b, ν (⋃ i, Prod.mk b ⁻¹' f i) = ∑' i, ν (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' f i) := fun b =>
measure_iUnion (fun i j hij => Disjoint.preimage _ (h1f hij)) fun i =>
measurable_prod_mk_left (h2f i)
simp_rw [this]
apply Measurable.ennreal_tsum h3f
#align measurable_measure_prod_mk_left_finite measurable_measure_prod_mk_left_finite
/-- If `ν` is an s-finite measure, and `s ⊆ α × β` is measurable, then `x ↦ ν { y | (x, y) ∈ s }`
is a measurable function. -/
theorem measurable_measure_prod_mk_left [SFinite ν] {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq ν]
simp_rw [Measure.sum_apply_of_countable]
exact Measurable.ennreal_tsum (fun i ↦ measurable_measure_prod_mk_left_finite hs)
#align measurable_measure_prod_mk_left measurable_measure_prod_mk_left
/-- If `μ` is a σ-finite measure, and `s ⊆ α × β` is measurable, then `y ↦ μ { x | (x, y) ∈ s }` is
a measurable function. -/
theorem measurable_measure_prod_mk_right {μ : Measure α} [SFinite μ] {s : Set (α × β)}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun y => μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' s) :=
measurable_measure_prod_mk_left (measurableSet_swap_iff.mpr hs)
#align measurable_measure_prod_mk_right measurable_measure_prod_mk_right
theorem Measurable.map_prod_mk_left [SFinite ν] :
Measurable fun x : α => map (Prod.mk x) ν := by
apply measurable_of_measurable_coe; intro s hs
simp_rw [map_apply measurable_prod_mk_left hs]
exact measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs
#align measurable.map_prod_mk_left Measurable.map_prod_mk_left
theorem Measurable.map_prod_mk_right {μ : Measure α} [SFinite μ] :
Measurable fun y : β => map (fun x : α => (x, y)) μ := by
apply measurable_of_measurable_coe; intro s hs
simp_rw [map_apply measurable_prod_mk_right hs]
exact measurable_measure_prod_mk_right hs
#align measurable.map_prod_mk_right Measurable.map_prod_mk_right
theorem MeasurableEmbedding.prod_mk {α β γ δ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α}
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {mδ : MeasurableSpace δ} {f : α → β}
{g : γ → δ} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) :
MeasurableEmbedding fun x : γ × α => (g x.1, f x.2) := by
have h_inj : Function.Injective fun x : γ × α => (g x.fst, f x.snd) := by
intro x y hxy
rw [← @Prod.mk.eta _ _ x, ← @Prod.mk.eta _ _ y]
simp only [Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hxy ⊢
exact ⟨hg.injective hxy.1, hf.injective hxy.2⟩
refine ⟨h_inj, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (hg.measurable.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk (hf.measurable.comp measurable_snd)
· -- Induction using the π-system of rectangles
refine fun s hs =>
@MeasurableSpace.induction_on_inter _
(fun s => MeasurableSet ((fun x : γ × α => (g x.fst, f x.snd)) '' s)) _ _
generateFrom_prod.symm isPiSystem_prod ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ _ hs
· simp only [Set.image_empty, MeasurableSet.empty]
· rintro t ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩
rw [← Set.prod_image_image_eq]
exact (hg.measurableSet_image.mpr ht₁).prod (hf.measurableSet_image.mpr ht₂)
· intro t _ ht_m
rw [← Set.range_diff_image h_inj, ← Set.prod_range_range_eq]
exact
MeasurableSet.diff (MeasurableSet.prod hg.measurableSet_range hf.measurableSet_range) ht_m
· intro g _ _ hg
simp_rw [Set.image_iUnion]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion hg
#align measurable_embedding.prod_mk MeasurableEmbedding.prod_mk
lemma MeasurableEmbedding.prod_mk_left {β γ : Type*} [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
(x : α) {f : γ → β} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) :
MeasurableEmbedding (fun y ↦ (x, f y)) where
injective := by
intro y y'
simp only [Prod.mk.injEq, true_and]
exact fun h ↦ hf.injective h
measurable := Measurable.prod_mk measurable_const hf.measurable
measurableSet_image' := by
intro s hs
convert (MeasurableSet.singleton x).prod (hf.measurableSet_image.mpr hs)
ext x
simp
lemma measurableEmbedding_prod_mk_left [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (x : α) :
MeasurableEmbedding (Prod.mk x : β → α × β) :=
MeasurableEmbedding.prod_mk_left x MeasurableEmbedding.id
lemma MeasurableEmbedding.prod_mk_right {β γ : Type*} [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : γ → β} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) (x : α) :
MeasurableEmbedding (fun y ↦ (f y, x)) where
injective := by
intro y y'
simp only [Prod.mk.injEq, and_true]
exact fun h ↦ hf.injective h
measurable := Measurable.prod_mk hf.measurable measurable_const
measurableSet_image' := by
intro s hs
convert (hf.measurableSet_image.mpr hs).prod (MeasurableSet.singleton x)
ext x
simp
lemma measurableEmbedding_prod_mk_right [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (x : α) :
MeasurableEmbedding (fun y ↦ (y, x) : β → β × α) :=
MeasurableEmbedding.prod_mk_right MeasurableEmbedding.id x
/-- The Lebesgue integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
Tonelli's theorem is measurable. -/
theorem Measurable.lintegral_prod_right' [SFinite ν] :
∀ {f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞}, Measurable f → Measurable fun x => ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂ν := by
have m := @measurable_prod_mk_left
refine Measurable.ennreal_induction (P := fun f => Measurable fun (x : α) => ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂ν)
?_ ?_ ?_
· intro c s hs
simp only [← indicator_comp_right]
suffices Measurable fun x => c * ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) by simpa [lintegral_indicator _ (m hs)]
exact (measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs).const_mul _
· rintro f g - hf - h2f h2g
simp only [Pi.add_apply]
conv => enter [1, x]; erw [lintegral_add_left (hf.comp m)]
exact h2f.add h2g
· intro f hf h2f h3f
have := measurable_iSup h3f
have : ∀ x, Monotone fun n y => f n (x, y) := fun x i j hij y => h2f hij (x, y)
conv => enter [1, x]; erw [lintegral_iSup (fun n => (hf n).comp m) (this x)]
assumption
#align measurable.lintegral_prod_right' Measurable.lintegral_prod_right'
/-- The Lebesgue integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
Tonelli's theorem is measurable.
This version has the argument `f` in curried form. -/
theorem Measurable.lintegral_prod_right [SFinite ν] {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (uncurry f)) : Measurable fun x => ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν :=
hf.lintegral_prod_right'
#align measurable.lintegral_prod_right Measurable.lintegral_prod_right
/-- The Lebesgue integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
the symmetric version of Tonelli's theorem is measurable. -/
theorem Measurable.lintegral_prod_left' [SFinite μ] {f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun y => ∫⁻ x, f (x, y) ∂μ :=
(measurable_swap_iff.mpr hf).lintegral_prod_right'
#align measurable.lintegral_prod_left' Measurable.lintegral_prod_left'
/-- The Lebesgue integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
the symmetric version of Tonelli's theorem is measurable.
This version has the argument `f` in curried form. -/
theorem Measurable.lintegral_prod_left [SFinite μ] {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (uncurry f)) : Measurable fun y => ∫⁻ x, f x y ∂μ :=
hf.lintegral_prod_left'
#align measurable.lintegral_prod_left Measurable.lintegral_prod_left
/-! ### The product measure -/
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/-- The binary product of measures. They are defined for arbitrary measures, but we basically
prove all properties under the assumption that at least one of them is s-finite. -/
protected irreducible_def prod (μ : Measure α) (ν : Measure β) : Measure (α × β) :=
bind μ fun x : α => map (Prod.mk x) ν
#align measure_theory.measure.prod MeasureTheory.Measure.prod
instance prod.measureSpace {α β} [MeasureSpace α] [MeasureSpace β] : MeasureSpace (α × β) where
volume := volume.prod volume
#align measure_theory.measure.prod.measure_space MeasureTheory.Measure.prod.measureSpace
theorem volume_eq_prod (α β) [MeasureSpace α] [MeasureSpace β] :
(volume : Measure (α × β)) = (volume : Measure α).prod (volume : Measure β) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.volume_eq_prod MeasureTheory.Measure.volume_eq_prod
variable [SFinite ν]
theorem prod_apply {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.prod ν s = ∫⁻ x, ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) ∂μ := by
simp_rw [Measure.prod, bind_apply hs (Measurable.map_prod_mk_left (ν := ν)),
map_apply measurable_prod_mk_left hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_apply
/-- The product measure of the product of two sets is the product of their measures. Note that we
do not need the sets to be measurable. -/
@[simp]
theorem prod_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : μ.prod ν (s ×ˢ t) = μ s * ν t := by
apply le_antisymm
· set S := toMeasurable μ s
set T := toMeasurable ν t
have hSTm : MeasurableSet (S ×ˢ T) :=
(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).prod (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
calc
μ.prod ν (s ×ˢ t) ≤ μ.prod ν (S ×ˢ T) := by gcongr <;> apply subset_toMeasurable
_ = μ S * ν T := by
rw [prod_apply hSTm]
simp_rw [mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, measure_if,
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), lintegral_const,
restrict_apply_univ, mul_comm]
_ = μ s * ν t := by rw [measure_toMeasurable, measure_toMeasurable]
· -- Formalization is based on https://mathoverflow.net/a/254134/136589
set ST := toMeasurable (μ.prod ν) (s ×ˢ t)
have hSTm : MeasurableSet ST := measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
have hST : s ×ˢ t ⊆ ST := subset_toMeasurable _ _
set f : α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' ST)
have hfm : Measurable f := measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hSTm
set s' : Set α := { x | ν t ≤ f x }
have hss' : s ⊆ s' := fun x hx => measure_mono fun y hy => hST <| mk_mem_prod hx hy
calc
μ s * ν t ≤ μ s' * ν t := by gcongr
_ = ∫⁻ _ in s', ν t ∂μ := by rw [set_lintegral_const, mul_comm]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s', f x ∂μ := set_lintegral_mono measurable_const hfm fun x => id
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := lintegral_mono' restrict_le_self le_rfl
_ = μ.prod ν ST := (prod_apply hSTm).symm
_ = μ.prod ν (s ×ˢ t) := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_prod MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_prod
@[simp] lemma map_fst_prod : Measure.map Prod.fst (μ.prod ν) = (ν univ) • μ := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.map_apply measurable_fst hs, ← prod_univ, mul_comm]
@[simp] lemma map_snd_prod : Measure.map Prod.snd (μ.prod ν) = (μ univ) • ν := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.map_apply measurable_snd hs, ← univ_prod]
instance prod.instIsOpenPosMeasure {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
{m : MeasurableSpace X} {μ : Measure X} [IsOpenPosMeasure μ] {m' : MeasurableSpace Y}
{ν : Measure Y} [IsOpenPosMeasure ν] [SFinite ν] : IsOpenPosMeasure (μ.prod ν) := by
constructor
rintro U U_open ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy⟩
rcases isOpen_prod_iff.1 U_open x y hxy with ⟨u, v, u_open, v_open, xu, yv, huv⟩
refine ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (measure_mono huv))
simp only [prod_prod, CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring.mul_pos]
constructor
· exact u_open.measure_pos μ ⟨x, xu⟩
· exact v_open.measure_pos ν ⟨y, yv⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.prod.is_open_pos_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.prod.instIsOpenPosMeasure
instance {X Y : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace X] [MeasureSpace X] [IsOpenPosMeasure (volume : Measure X)]
[TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasureSpace Y] [IsOpenPosMeasure (volume : Measure Y)]
[SFinite (volume : Measure Y)] : IsOpenPosMeasure (volume : Measure (X × Y)) :=
prod.instIsOpenPosMeasure
instance prod.instIsFiniteMeasure {α β : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
(μ : Measure α) (ν : Measure β) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.prod ν) := by
constructor
rw [← univ_prod_univ, prod_prod]
exact mul_lt_top (measure_lt_top _ _).ne (measure_lt_top _ _).ne
#align measure_theory.measure.prod.measure_theory.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.prod.instIsFiniteMeasure
instance {α β : Type*} [MeasureSpace α] [MeasureSpace β] [IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure α)]
[IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure β)] : IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (α × β)) :=
prod.instIsFiniteMeasure _ _
instance prod.instIsProbabilityMeasure {α β : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α}
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (μ : Measure α) (ν : Measure β) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
[IsProbabilityMeasure ν] : IsProbabilityMeasure (μ.prod ν) :=
⟨by rw [← univ_prod_univ, prod_prod, measure_univ, measure_univ, mul_one]⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.prod.measure_theory.is_probability_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.prod.instIsProbabilityMeasure
instance {α β : Type*} [MeasureSpace α] [MeasureSpace β]
[IsProbabilityMeasure (volume : Measure α)] [IsProbabilityMeasure (volume : Measure β)] :
IsProbabilityMeasure (volume : Measure (α × β)) :=
prod.instIsProbabilityMeasure _ _
instance prod.instIsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (μ : Measure α) (ν : Measure β)
[IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts ν] [SFinite ν] :
IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (μ.prod ν) := by
refine ⟨fun K hK => ?_⟩
set L := (Prod.fst '' K) ×ˢ (Prod.snd '' K) with hL
have : K ⊆ L := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hxy
simp only [L, prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_image, Prod.exists, exists_and_right,
exists_eq_right]
exact ⟨⟨y, hxy⟩, ⟨x, hxy⟩⟩
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono this)
rw [hL, prod_prod]
exact
mul_lt_top (IsCompact.measure_lt_top (hK.image continuous_fst)).ne
(IsCompact.measure_lt_top (hK.image continuous_snd)).ne
#align measure_theory.measure.prod.measure_theory.is_finite_measure_on_compacts MeasureTheory.Measure.prod.instIsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts
instance {X Y : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace X] [MeasureSpace X] [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (volume : Measure X)]
[TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasureSpace Y] [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (volume : Measure Y)]
[SFinite (volume : Measure Y)] : IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (volume : Measure (X × Y)) :=
prod.instIsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts _ _
instance prod.instNoAtoms_fst [NoAtoms μ] :
NoAtoms (Measure.prod μ ν) := by
refine NoAtoms.mk (fun x => ?_)
rw [← Set.singleton_prod_singleton, Measure.prod_prod, measure_singleton, zero_mul]
instance prod.instNoAtoms_snd [NoAtoms ν] :
NoAtoms (Measure.prod μ ν) := by
refine NoAtoms.mk (fun x => ?_)
rw [← Set.singleton_prod_singleton, Measure.prod_prod, measure_singleton (μ := ν), mul_zero]
theorem ae_measure_lt_top {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : (μ.prod ν) s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
rw [prod_apply hs] at h2s
exact ae_lt_top (measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs) h2s
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_measure_lt_top MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_measure_lt_top
/-- Note: the assumption `hs` cannot be dropped. For a counterexample, see
Walter Rudin *Real and Complex Analysis*, example (c) in section 8.9. -/
theorem measure_prod_null {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.prod ν s = 0 ↔ (fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s)) =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [prod_apply hs, lintegral_eq_zero_iff (measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs)]
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_prod_null MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_prod_null
/-- Note: the converse is not true without assuming that `s` is measurable. For a counterexample,
see Walter Rudin *Real and Complex Analysis*, example (c) in section 8.9. -/
theorem measure_ae_null_of_prod_null {s : Set (α × β)} (h : μ.prod ν s = 0) :
(fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s)) =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
obtain ⟨t, hst, mt, ht⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null h
rw [measure_prod_null mt] at ht
rw [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff]
exact
⟨EventuallyLE.trans_eq (eventually_of_forall fun x => (measure_mono (preimage_mono hst) : _))
ht,
eventually_of_forall fun x => zero_le _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_ae_null_of_prod_null MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_ae_null_of_prod_null
theorem AbsolutelyContinuous.prod [SFinite ν'] (h1 : μ ≪ μ') (h2 : ν ≪ ν') :
μ.prod ν ≪ μ'.prod ν' := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs h2s => ?_
rw [measure_prod_null hs] at h2s ⊢
exact (h2s.filter_mono h1.ae_le).mono fun _ h => h2 h
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.prod MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.prod
/-- Note: the converse is not true. For a counterexample, see
Walter Rudin *Real and Complex Analysis*, example (c) in section 8.9. It is true if the set is
measurable, see `ae_prod_mem_iff_ae_ae_mem`. -/
theorem ae_ae_of_ae_prod {p : α × β → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ z ∂μ.prod ν, p z) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᵐ y ∂ν, p (x, y) :=
measure_ae_null_of_prod_null h
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_ae_of_ae_prod MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_ae_of_ae_prod
theorem ae_ae_eq_curry_of_prod {f g : α × β → γ} (h : f =ᵐ[μ.prod ν] g) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, curry f x =ᵐ[ν] curry g x :=
ae_ae_of_ae_prod h
theorem ae_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_uncurry {f g : α → β → γ} (h : uncurry f =ᵐ[μ.prod ν] uncurry g) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x =ᵐ[ν] g x :=
ae_ae_eq_curry_of_prod h
theorem ae_prod_mem_iff_ae_ae_mem {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(∀ᵐ z ∂μ.prod ν, z ∈ s) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᵐ y ∂ν, (x, y) ∈ s :=
measure_prod_null hs.compl
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_fst : QuasiMeasurePreserving Prod.fst (μ.prod ν) μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_fst, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs h2s => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_fst hs, ← prod_univ, prod_prod, h2s, zero_mul]
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving_fst MeasureTheory.Measure.quasiMeasurePreserving_fst
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_snd : QuasiMeasurePreserving Prod.snd (μ.prod ν) ν := by
refine ⟨measurable_snd, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs h2s => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_snd hs, ← univ_prod, prod_prod, h2s, mul_zero]
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving_snd MeasureTheory.Measure.quasiMeasurePreserving_snd
lemma set_prod_ae_eq {s s' : Set α} {t t' : Set β} (hs : s =ᵐ[μ] s') (ht : t =ᵐ[ν] t') :
(s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) =ᵐ[μ.prod ν] (s' ×ˢ t' : Set (α × β)) :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_fst.preimage_ae_eq hs).inter
(quasiMeasurePreserving_snd.preimage_ae_eq ht)
lemma measure_prod_compl_eq_zero {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(s_ae_univ : μ sᶜ = 0) (t_ae_univ : ν tᶜ = 0) :
μ.prod ν (s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = 0 := by
rw [Set.compl_prod_eq_union, measure_union_null_iff]
simp [s_ae_univ, t_ae_univ]
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(s_mble : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t_mble : NullMeasurableSet t ν) :
NullMeasurableSet (s ×ˢ t) (μ.prod ν) :=
let ⟨s₀, mble_s₀, s_aeeq_s₀⟩ := s_mble
let ⟨t₀, mble_t₀, t_aeeq_t₀⟩ := t_mble
⟨s₀ ×ˢ t₀, ⟨mble_s₀.prod mble_t₀, set_prod_ae_eq s_aeeq_s₀ t_aeeq_t₀⟩⟩
/-- If `s ×ˢ t` is a null measurable set and `μ s ≠ 0`, then `t` is a null measurable set. -/
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.right_of_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(h : NullMeasurableSet (s ×ˢ t) (μ.prod ν)) (hs : μ s ≠ 0) : NullMeasurableSet t ν := by
rcases h with ⟨u, hum, hu⟩
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' (s ×ˢ t)) =ᵐ[ν] (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' u) :=
((frequently_ae_iff.2 hs).and_eventually (ae_ae_eq_curry_of_prod hu)).exists
refine ⟨Prod.mk x ⁻¹' u, measurable_prod_mk_left hum, ?_⟩
rwa [mk_preimage_prod_right hxs] at hx
/-- If `Prod.snd ⁻¹' t` is a null measurable set and `μ ≠ 0`, then `t` is a null measurable set. -/
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.of_preimage_snd [NeZero μ] {t : Set β}
(h : NullMeasurableSet (Prod.snd ⁻¹' t) (μ.prod ν)) : NullMeasurableSet t ν :=
.right_of_prod (by rwa [univ_prod]) (NeZero.ne _)
/-- `Prod.snd ⁻¹' t` is null measurable w.r.t. `μ.prod ν` iff `t` is null measurable w.r.t. `ν`
provided that `μ ≠ 0`. -/
lemma nullMeasurableSet_preimage_snd [NeZero μ] {t : Set β} :
NullMeasurableSet (Prod.snd ⁻¹' t) (μ.prod ν) ↔ NullMeasurableSet t ν :=
⟨.of_preimage_snd, (.preimage · quasiMeasurePreserving_snd)⟩
lemma nullMeasurable_comp_snd [NeZero μ] {f : β → γ} :
NullMeasurable (f ∘ Prod.snd) (μ.prod ν) ↔ NullMeasurable f ν :=
forall₂_congr fun s _ ↦ nullMeasurableSet_preimage_snd (t := f ⁻¹' s)
/-- `μ.prod ν` has finite spanning sets in rectangles of finite spanning sets. -/
noncomputable def FiniteSpanningSetsIn.prod {ν : Measure β} {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)}
(hμ : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C) (hν : ν.FiniteSpanningSetsIn D) :
(μ.prod ν).FiniteSpanningSetsIn (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
haveI := hν.sigmaFinite
refine
⟨fun n => hμ.set n.unpair.1 ×ˢ hν.set n.unpair.2, fun n =>
mem_image2_of_mem (hμ.set_mem _) (hν.set_mem _), fun n => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [prod_prod]
exact mul_lt_top (hμ.finite _).ne (hν.finite _).ne
· simp_rw [iUnion_unpair_prod, hμ.spanning, hν.spanning, univ_prod_univ]
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.prod MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.prod
lemma prod_sum_left {ι : Type*} (m : ι → Measure α) (μ : Measure β) [SFinite μ] :
(Measure.sum m).prod μ = Measure.sum (fun i ↦ (m i).prod μ) := by
ext s hs
simp only [prod_apply hs, lintegral_sum_measure, hs, sum_apply, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_prod MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_sum_left
lemma prod_sum_right {ι' : Type*} [Countable ι'] (m : Measure α) (m' : ι' → Measure β)
[∀ n, SFinite (m' n)] :
m.prod (Measure.sum m') = Measure.sum (fun p ↦ m.prod (m' p)) := by
ext s hs
simp only [prod_apply hs, lintegral_sum_measure, hs, sum_apply, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
have M : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) := fun x => measurable_prod_mk_left hs
simp_rw [Measure.sum_apply _ (M _)]
rw [lintegral_tsum (fun i ↦ (measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs).aemeasurable)]
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_sum_right
lemma prod_sum {ι ι' : Type*} [Countable ι'] (m : ι → Measure α) (m' : ι' → Measure β)
[∀ n, SFinite (m' n)] :
(Measure.sum m).prod (Measure.sum m') =
Measure.sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ (m p.1).prod (m' p.2)) := by
simp_rw [prod_sum_left, prod_sum_right, sum_sum]
instance prod.instSigmaFinite {α β : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SigmaFinite μ] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {ν : Measure β} [SigmaFinite ν] :
SigmaFinite (μ.prod ν) :=
(μ.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn.prod ν.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn).sigmaFinite
#align measure_theory.measure.prod.sigma_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.prod.instSigmaFinite
instance prod.instSFinite {α β : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SFinite μ] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {ν : Measure β} [SFinite ν] :
SFinite (μ.prod ν) := by
have : μ.prod ν =
Measure.sum (fun (p : ℕ × ℕ) ↦ (sFiniteSeq μ p.1).prod (sFiniteSeq ν p.2)) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq μ, ← sum_sFiniteSeq ν]
apply prod_sum
rw [this]
infer_instance
instance {α β} [MeasureSpace α] [SigmaFinite (volume : Measure α)]
[MeasureSpace β] [SigmaFinite (volume : Measure β)] : SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α × β)) :=
prod.instSigmaFinite
instance {α β} [MeasureSpace α] [SFinite (volume : Measure α)]
[MeasureSpace β] [SFinite (volume : Measure β)] : SFinite (volume : Measure (α × β)) :=
prod.instSFinite
/-- A measure on a product space equals the product measure if they are equal on rectangles
with as sides sets that generate the corresponding σ-algebras. -/
theorem prod_eq_generateFrom {μ : Measure α} {ν : Measure β} {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)}
(hC : generateFrom C = ‹_›) (hD : generateFrom D = ‹_›) (h2C : IsPiSystem C)
(h2D : IsPiSystem D) (h3C : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C) (h3D : ν.FiniteSpanningSetsIn D)
{μν : Measure (α × β)} (h₁ : ∀ s ∈ C, ∀ t ∈ D, μν (s ×ˢ t) = μ s * ν t) : μ.prod ν = μν := by
refine
(h3C.prod h3D).ext
(generateFrom_eq_prod hC hD h3C.isCountablySpanning h3D.isCountablySpanning).symm
(h2C.prod h2D) ?_
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
haveI := h3D.sigmaFinite
rw [h₁ s hs t ht, prod_prod]
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_eq_generate_from MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_eq_generateFrom
/- Note that the next theorem is not true for s-finite measures: let `μ = ν = ∞ • Leb` on `[0,1]`
(they are s-finite as countable sums of the finite Lebesgue measure), and let `μν = μ.prod ν + λ`
where `λ` is Lebesgue measure on the diagonal. Then both measures give infinite mass to rectangles
`s × t` whose sides have positive Lebesgue measure, and `0` measure when one of the sides has zero
Lebesgue measure. And yet they do not coincide, as the first one gives zero mass to the diagonal,
and the second one gives mass one.
-/
/-- A measure on a product space equals the product measure of sigma-finite measures if they are
equal on rectangles. -/
theorem prod_eq {μ : Measure α} [SigmaFinite μ] {ν : Measure β} [SigmaFinite ν]
{μν : Measure (α × β)}
(h : ∀ s t, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet t → μν (s ×ˢ t) = μ s * ν t) : μ.prod ν = μν :=
prod_eq_generateFrom generateFrom_measurableSet generateFrom_measurableSet
isPiSystem_measurableSet isPiSystem_measurableSet μ.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn
ν.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn fun s hs t ht => h s t hs ht
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_eq
variable [SFinite μ]
theorem prod_swap : map Prod.swap (μ.prod ν) = ν.prod μ := by
have : sum (fun (i : ℕ × ℕ) ↦ map Prod.swap ((sFiniteSeq μ i.1).prod (sFiniteSeq ν i.2)))
= sum (fun (i : ℕ × ℕ) ↦ map Prod.swap ((sFiniteSeq μ i.2).prod (sFiniteSeq ν i.1))) := by
ext s hs
rw [sum_apply _ hs, sum_apply _ hs]
exact ((Equiv.prodComm ℕ ℕ).tsum_eq _).symm
rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq μ, ← sum_sFiniteSeq ν, prod_sum, prod_sum,
map_sum measurable_swap.aemeasurable, this]
congr 1
ext1 i
refine (prod_eq ?_).symm
intro s t hs ht
simp_rw [map_apply measurable_swap (hs.prod ht), preimage_swap_prod, prod_prod, mul_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_swap MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_swap
theorem measurePreserving_swap : MeasurePreserving Prod.swap (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
⟨measurable_swap, prod_swap⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_preserving_swap MeasureTheory.Measure.measurePreserving_swap
theorem prod_apply_symm {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.prod ν s = ∫⁻ y, μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' s) ∂ν := by
rw [← prod_swap, map_apply measurable_swap hs, prod_apply (measurable_swap hs)]
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_apply_symm MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_apply_symm
/-- If `s ×ˢ t` is a null measurable set and `ν t ≠ 0`, then `s` is a null measurable set. -/
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.left_of_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(h : NullMeasurableSet (s ×ˢ t) (μ.prod ν)) (ht : ν t ≠ 0) : NullMeasurableSet s μ := by
refine .right_of_prod ?_ ht
rw [← preimage_swap_prod]
exact h.preimage measurePreserving_swap.quasiMeasurePreserving
/-- If `Prod.fst ⁻¹' s` is a null measurable set and `ν ≠ 0`, then `s` is a null measurable set. -/
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.of_preimage_fst [NeZero ν] {s : Set α}
(h : NullMeasurableSet (Prod.fst ⁻¹' s) (μ.prod ν)) : NullMeasurableSet s μ :=
.left_of_prod (by rwa [prod_univ]) (NeZero.ne _)
/-- `Prod.fst ⁻¹' s` is null measurable w.r.t. `μ.prod ν` iff `s` is null measurable w.r.t. `μ`
provided that `ν ≠ 0`. -/
lemma nullMeasurableSet_preimage_fst [NeZero ν] {s : Set α} :
NullMeasurableSet (Prod.fst ⁻¹' s) (μ.prod ν) ↔ NullMeasurableSet s μ :=
⟨.of_preimage_fst, (.preimage · quasiMeasurePreserving_fst)⟩
lemma nullMeasurable_comp_fst [NeZero ν] {f : α → γ} :
NullMeasurable (f ∘ Prod.fst) (μ.prod ν) ↔ NullMeasurable f μ :=
forall₂_congr fun s _ ↦ nullMeasurableSet_preimage_fst (s := f ⁻¹' s)
/-- The product of two non-null sets is null measurable
if and only if both of them are null measurable. -/
lemma nullMeasurableSet_prod_of_ne_zero {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : μ s ≠ 0) (ht : ν t ≠ 0) :
NullMeasurableSet (s ×ˢ t) (μ.prod ν) ↔ NullMeasurableSet s μ ∧ NullMeasurableSet t ν :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.left_of_prod ht, h.right_of_prod hs⟩, fun ⟨hs, ht⟩ ↦ hs.prod ht⟩
/-- The product of two sets is null measurable
if and only if both of them are null measurable or one of them has measure zero. -/
lemma nullMeasurableSet_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
NullMeasurableSet (s ×ˢ t) (μ.prod ν) ↔
NullMeasurableSet s μ ∧ NullMeasurableSet t ν ∨ μ s = 0 ∨ ν t = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne (μ s) 0 with hs | hs; · simp [NullMeasurableSet.of_null, *]
rcases eq_or_ne (ν t) 0 with ht | ht; · simp [NullMeasurableSet.of_null, *]
simp [*, nullMeasurableSet_prod_of_ne_zero]
theorem prodAssoc_prod [SFinite τ] :
map MeasurableEquiv.prodAssoc ((μ.prod ν).prod τ) = μ.prod (ν.prod τ) := by
have : sum (fun (p : ℕ × ℕ × ℕ) ↦
(sFiniteSeq μ p.1).prod ((sFiniteSeq ν p.2.1).prod (sFiniteSeq τ p.2.2)))
= sum (fun (p : (ℕ × ℕ) × ℕ) ↦
(sFiniteSeq μ p.1.1).prod ((sFiniteSeq ν p.1.2).prod (sFiniteSeq τ p.2))) := by
ext s hs
rw [sum_apply _ hs, sum_apply _ hs, ← (Equiv.prodAssoc _ _ _).tsum_eq]
simp only [Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq μ, ← sum_sFiniteSeq ν, ← sum_sFiniteSeq τ, prod_sum, prod_sum,
map_sum MeasurableEquiv.prodAssoc.measurable.aemeasurable, prod_sum, prod_sum, this]
congr
ext1 i
refine (prod_eq_generateFrom generateFrom_measurableSet generateFrom_prod
isPiSystem_measurableSet isPiSystem_prod ((sFiniteSeq μ i.1.1)).toFiniteSpanningSetsIn
((sFiniteSeq ν i.1.2).toFiniteSpanningSetsIn.prod (sFiniteSeq τ i.2).toFiniteSpanningSetsIn)
?_).symm
rintro s hs _ ⟨t, ht, u, hu, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hs ht hu
simp_rw [map_apply (MeasurableEquiv.measurable _) (hs.prod (ht.prod hu)),
MeasurableEquiv.prodAssoc, MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk, Equiv.prod_assoc_preimage, prod_prod,
mul_assoc]
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_assoc_prod MeasureTheory.Measure.prodAssoc_prod
/-! ### The product of specific measures -/
theorem prod_restrict (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(μ.restrict s).prod (ν.restrict t) = (μ.prod ν).restrict (s ×ˢ t) := by
rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq μ, ← sum_sFiniteSeq ν, restrict_sum_of_countable, restrict_sum_of_countable,
prod_sum, prod_sum, restrict_sum_of_countable]
congr 1
ext1 i
refine prod_eq fun s' t' hs' ht' => ?_
rw [restrict_apply (hs'.prod ht'), prod_inter_prod, prod_prod, restrict_apply hs',
restrict_apply ht']
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_restrict MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_restrict
theorem restrict_prod_eq_prod_univ (s : Set α) :
(μ.restrict s).prod ν = (μ.prod ν).restrict (s ×ˢ univ) := by
have : ν = ν.restrict Set.univ := Measure.restrict_univ.symm
rw [this, Measure.prod_restrict, ← this]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_prod_eq_prod_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_prod_eq_prod_univ
theorem prod_dirac (y : β) : μ.prod (dirac y) = map (fun x => (x, y)) μ := by
rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq μ, prod_sum_left, map_sum measurable_prod_mk_right.aemeasurable]
congr
ext1 i
refine prod_eq fun s t hs ht => ?_
simp_rw [map_apply measurable_prod_mk_right (hs.prod ht), mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, measure_if,
dirac_apply' _ ht, ← indicator_mul_right _ fun _ => sFiniteSeq μ i s, Pi.one_apply, mul_one]
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_dirac MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_dirac
theorem dirac_prod (x : α) : (dirac x).prod ν = map (Prod.mk x) ν := by
rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq ν, prod_sum_right, map_sum measurable_prod_mk_left.aemeasurable]
congr
ext1 i
refine prod_eq fun s t hs ht => ?_
simp_rw [map_apply measurable_prod_mk_left (hs.prod ht), mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, measure_if,
dirac_apply' _ hs, ← indicator_mul_left _ _ fun _ => sFiniteSeq ν i t, Pi.one_apply, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.measure.dirac_prod MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac_prod
theorem dirac_prod_dirac {x : α} {y : β} : (dirac x).prod (dirac y) = dirac (x, y) := by
rw [prod_dirac, map_dirac measurable_prod_mk_right]
#align measure_theory.measure.dirac_prod_dirac MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac_prod_dirac
theorem prod_add (ν' : Measure β) [SFinite ν'] : μ.prod (ν + ν') = μ.prod ν + μ.prod ν' := by
simp_rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq ν, ← sum_sFiniteSeq ν', sum_add_sum, ← sum_sFiniteSeq μ, prod_sum,
sum_add_sum]
congr
ext1 i
refine prod_eq fun s t _ _ => ?_
simp_rw [add_apply, prod_prod, left_distrib]
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_add MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_add
theorem add_prod (μ' : Measure α) [SFinite μ'] : (μ + μ').prod ν = μ.prod ν + μ'.prod ν := by
simp_rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq μ, ← sum_sFiniteSeq μ', sum_add_sum, ← sum_sFiniteSeq ν, prod_sum,
sum_add_sum]
congr
ext1 i
refine prod_eq fun s t _ _ => ?_
simp_rw [add_apply, prod_prod, right_distrib]
#align measure_theory.measure.add_prod MeasureTheory.Measure.add_prod
@[simp]
theorem zero_prod (ν : Measure β) : (0 : Measure α).prod ν = 0 := by
rw [Measure.prod]
exact bind_zero_left _
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_prod MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_zero (μ : Measure α) : μ.prod (0 : Measure β) = 0 := by simp [Measure.prod]
#align measure_theory.measure.prod_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_zero
theorem map_prod_map {δ} [MeasurableSpace δ] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ} (μa : Measure α)
(μc : Measure γ) [SFinite μa] [SFinite μc] (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
(map f μa).prod (map g μc) = map (Prod.map f g) (μa.prod μc) := by
simp_rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq μa, ← sum_sFiniteSeq μc, map_sum hf.aemeasurable,
map_sum hg.aemeasurable, prod_sum, map_sum (hf.prod_map hg).aemeasurable]
congr
ext1 i
refine prod_eq fun s t hs ht => ?_
rw [map_apply (hf.prod_map hg) (hs.prod ht), map_apply hf hs, map_apply hg ht]
exact prod_prod (f ⁻¹' s) (g ⁻¹' t)
#align measure_theory.measure.map_prod_map MeasureTheory.Measure.map_prod_map
end Measure
open Measure
namespace MeasurePreserving
variable {δ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace δ] {μa : Measure α} {μb : Measure β} {μc : Measure γ}
{μd : Measure δ}
theorem skew_product [SFinite μa] [SFinite μc] {f : α → β} (hf : MeasurePreserving f μa μb)
{g : α → γ → δ} (hgm : Measurable (uncurry g)) (hg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μa, map (g x) μc = μd) :
MeasurePreserving (fun p : α × γ => (f p.1, g p.1 p.2)) (μa.prod μc) (μb.prod μd) := by
classical
have : Measurable fun p : α × γ => (f p.1, g p.1 p.2) := (hf.1.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk hgm
/- if `μa = 0`, then the lemma is trivial, otherwise we can use `hg`
to deduce `SFinite μd`. -/
rcases eq_or_ne μa 0 with (rfl | ha)
· rw [← hf.map_eq, zero_prod, Measure.map_zero, zero_prod]
exact ⟨this, by simp only [Measure.map_zero]⟩
have sf : SFinite μd := by
rcases (ae_neBot.2 ha).nonempty_of_mem hg with ⟨x, hx : map (g x) μc = μd⟩
rw [← hx]
infer_instance
-- Thus we can use the integral formula for the product measure, and compute things explicitly
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
ext s hs
rw [map_apply this hs, prod_apply (this hs), prod_apply hs,
← hf.lintegral_comp (measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs)]
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hg] with a ha
rw [← ha, map_apply hgm.of_uncurry_left (measurable_prod_mk_left hs), preimage_preimage,
preimage_preimage]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.skew_product MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.skew_product
/-- If `f : α → β` sends the measure `μa` to `μb` and `g : γ → δ` sends the measure `μc` to `μd`,
then `Prod.map f g` sends `μa.prod μc` to `μb.prod μd`. -/
protected theorem prod [SFinite μa] [SFinite μc] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ}
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μa μb) (hg : MeasurePreserving g μc μd) :
MeasurePreserving (Prod.map f g) (μa.prod μc) (μb.prod μd) :=
have : Measurable (uncurry fun _ : α => g) := hg.1.comp measurable_snd
hf.skew_product this <| Filter.eventually_of_forall fun _ => hg.map_eq
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.prod MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.prod
end MeasurePreserving
namespace QuasiMeasurePreserving
theorem prod_of_right {f : α × β → γ} {μ : Measure α} {ν : Measure β} {τ : Measure γ}
(hf : Measurable f) [SFinite ν]
(h2f : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun y => f (x, y)) ν τ) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f (μ.prod ν) τ := by
refine ⟨hf, ?_⟩
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs h2s => ?_
rw [map_apply hf hs, prod_apply (hf hs)]; simp_rw [preimage_preimage]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (h2f.mono fun x hx => hx.preimage_null h2s), lintegral_zero]
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving.prod_of_right MeasureTheory.QuasiMeasurePreserving.prod_of_right
theorem prod_of_left {α β γ} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
{f : α × β → γ} {μ : Measure α} {ν : Measure β} {τ : Measure γ} (hf : Measurable f)
[SFinite μ] [SFinite ν]
(h2f : ∀ᵐ y ∂ν, QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun x => f (x, y)) μ τ) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f (μ.prod ν) τ := by
rw [← prod_swap]
convert (QuasiMeasurePreserving.prod_of_right (hf.comp measurable_swap) h2f).comp
((measurable_swap.measurePreserving (ν.prod μ)).symm
MeasurableEquiv.prodComm).quasiMeasurePreserving
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving.prod_of_left MeasureTheory.QuasiMeasurePreserving.prod_of_left
end QuasiMeasurePreserving
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory.Measure
section
theorem AEMeasurable.prod_swap [SFinite μ] [SFinite ν] {f : β × α → γ}
(hf : AEMeasurable f (ν.prod μ)) : AEMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.swap) (μ.prod ν) := by
rw [← Measure.prod_swap] at hf
exact hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap
#align ae_measurable.prod_swap AEMeasurable.prod_swap
theorem AEMeasurable.fst [SFinite ν] {f : α → γ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.1) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving quasiMeasurePreserving_fst
#align ae_measurable.fst AEMeasurable.fst
theorem AEMeasurable.snd [SFinite ν] {f : β → γ} (hf : AEMeasurable f ν) :
AEMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.2) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving quasiMeasurePreserving_snd
#align ae_measurable.snd AEMeasurable.snd
end
namespace MeasureTheory
/-! ### The Lebesgue integral on a product -/
variable [SFinite ν]
theorem lintegral_prod_swap [SFinite μ] (f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ z, f z.swap ∂ν.prod μ = ∫⁻ z, f z ∂μ.prod ν :=
measurePreserving_swap.lintegral_comp_emb MeasurableEquiv.prodComm.measurableEmbedding f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_prod_swap MeasureTheory.lintegral_prod_swap
/-- **Tonelli's Theorem**: For `ℝ≥0∞`-valued measurable functions on `α × β`,
the integral of `f` is equal to the iterated integral. -/
theorem lintegral_prod_of_measurable :
∀ (f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞), Measurable f → ∫⁻ z, f z ∂μ.prod ν = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ := by
have m := @measurable_prod_mk_left
refine Measurable.ennreal_induction
(P := fun f => ∫⁻ z, f z ∂μ.prod ν = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ) ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro c s hs
conv_rhs =>
enter [2, x, 2, y]
rw [← indicator_comp_right, const_def, const_comp, ← const_def]
conv_rhs =>
enter [2, x]
rw [lintegral_indicator _ (m (x := x) hs), lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
simp [hs, lintegral_const_mul, measurable_measure_prod_mk_left (ν := ν) hs, prod_apply]
· rintro f g - hf _ h2f h2g
simp only [Pi.add_apply]
conv_lhs => rw [lintegral_add_left hf]
conv_rhs => enter [2, x]; erw [lintegral_add_left (hf.comp (m (x := x)))]
simp [lintegral_add_left, Measurable.lintegral_prod_right', hf, h2f, h2g]
· intro f hf h2f h3f
have kf : ∀ x n, Measurable fun y => f n (x, y) := fun x n => (hf n).comp m
have k2f : ∀ x, Monotone fun n y => f n (x, y) := fun x i j hij y => h2f hij (x, y)
have lf : ∀ n, Measurable fun x => ∫⁻ y, f n (x, y) ∂ν := fun n => (hf n).lintegral_prod_right'
have l2f : Monotone fun n x => ∫⁻ y, f n (x, y) ∂ν := fun i j hij x =>
lintegral_mono (k2f x hij)
simp only [lintegral_iSup hf h2f, lintegral_iSup (kf _), k2f, lintegral_iSup lf l2f, h3f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_prod_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_prod_of_measurable
/-- **Tonelli's Theorem**: For `ℝ≥0∞`-valued almost everywhere measurable functions on `α × β`,
the integral of `f` is equal to the iterated integral. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Prod/Basic.lean | 967 | 973 | theorem lintegral_prod (f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.prod ν)) :
∫⁻ z, f z ∂μ.prod ν = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ := by |
have A : ∫⁻ z, f z ∂μ.prod ν = ∫⁻ z, hf.mk f z ∂μ.prod ν := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : (∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, hf.mk f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_prod hf.ae_eq_mk] with _ ha using lintegral_congr_ae ha
rw [A, B, lintegral_prod_of_measurable _ hf.measurable_mk]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LocallyIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
#align_import analysis.convolution from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8905e5ed90859939681a725b00f6063e65096d95"
/-!
# Convolution of functions
This file defines the convolution on two functions, i.e. `x ↦ ∫ f(t)g(x - t) ∂t`.
In the general case, these functions can be vector-valued, and have an arbitrary (additive)
group as domain. We use a continuous bilinear operation `L` on these function values as
"multiplication". The domain must be equipped with a Haar measure `μ`
(though many individual results have weaker conditions on `μ`).
For many applications we can take `L = ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℝ` or
`L = ContinuousLinearMap.mul ℝ ℝ`.
We also define `ConvolutionExists` and `ConvolutionExistsAt` to state that the convolution is
well-defined (everywhere or at a single point). These conditions are needed for pointwise
computations (e.g. `ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add`), but are generally not strong enough for any
local (or global) properties of the convolution. For this we need stronger assumptions on `f`
and/or `g`, and generally if we impose stronger conditions on one of the functions, we can impose
weaker conditions on the other.
We have proven many of the properties of the convolution assuming one of these functions
has compact support (in which case the other function only needs to be locally integrable).
We still need to prove the properties for other pairs of conditions (e.g. both functions are
rapidly decreasing)
# Design Decisions
We use a bilinear map `L` to "multiply" the two functions in the integrand.
This generality has several advantages
* This allows us to compute the total derivative of the convolution, in case the functions are
multivariate. The total derivative is again a convolution, but where the codomains of the
functions can be higher-dimensional. See `HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right`.
* This allows us to use `@[to_additive]` everywhere (which would not be possible if we would use
`mul`/`smul` in the integral, since `@[to_additive]` will incorrectly also try to additivize
those definitions).
* We need to support the case where at least one of the functions is vector-valued, but if we use
`smul` to multiply the functions, that would be an asymmetric definition.
# Main Definitions
* `convolution f g L μ x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ` is the convolution of
`f` and `g` w.r.t. the continuous bilinear map `L` and measure `μ`.
* `ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ` states that the convolution `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x` is well-defined
(i.e. the integral exists).
* `ConvolutionExists f g L μ` states that the convolution `f ⋆[L, μ] g` is well-defined at each
point.
# Main Results
* `HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right` and
`HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_left`: we can compute the total derivative
of the convolution as a convolution with the total derivative of the right (left) function.
* `HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_right` and
`HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_left`: the convolution is `𝒞ⁿ` if one of the functions
is `𝒞ⁿ` with compact support and the other function in locally integrable.
Versions of these statements for functions depending on a parameter are also given.
* `convolution_tendsto_right`: Given a sequence of nonnegative normalized functions whose support
tends to a small neighborhood around `0`, the convolution tends to the right argument.
This is specialized to bump functions in `ContDiffBump.convolution_tendsto_right`.
# Notation
The following notations are localized in the locale `convolution`:
* `f ⋆[L, μ] g` for the convolution. Note: you have to use parentheses to apply the convolution
to an argument: `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x`.
* `f ⋆[L] g := f ⋆[L, volume] g`
* `f ⋆ g := f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ] g`
# To do
* Existence and (uniform) continuity of the convolution if
one of the maps is in `ℒ^p` and the other in `ℒ^q` with `1 / p + 1 / q = 1`.
This might require a generalization of `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.smul` where `smul` is generalized
to a continuous bilinear map.
(see e.g. [Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 2)][fremlin_vol2], 255K)
* The convolution is an `AEStronglyMeasurable` function
(see e.g. [Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 2)][fremlin_vol2], 255I).
* Prove properties about the convolution if both functions are rapidly decreasing.
* Use `@[to_additive]` everywhere (this likely requires changes in `to_additive`)
-/
open Set Function Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ContinuousLinearMap Metric Bornology
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal Filter
universe u𝕜 uG uE uE' uE'' uF uF' uF'' uP
variable {𝕜 : Type u𝕜} {G : Type uG} {E : Type uE} {E' : Type uE'} {E'' : Type uE''} {F : Type uF}
{F' : Type uF'} {F'' : Type uF''} {P : Type uP}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedAddCommGroup E'']
[NormedAddCommGroup F] {f f' : G → E} {g g' : G → E'} {x x' : G} {y y' : E}
namespace MeasureTheory
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
section NoMeasurability
variable [AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G]
theorem convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset {C : ℝ} (hC : ∀ i, ‖g i‖ ≤ C) {x t : G}
{s u : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hu : -tsupport g + s ⊆ u) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ u.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * C) t := by
-- Porting note: had to add `f := _`
refine le_indicator (f := fun t ↦ ‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖) (fun t _ => ?_) (fun t ht => ?_) t
· apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
· have : x - t ∉ support g := by
refine mt (fun hxt => hu ?_) ht
refine ⟨_, Set.neg_mem_neg.mpr (subset_closure hxt), _, hx, ?_⟩
simp only [neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
simp only [nmem_support.mp this, (L _).map_zero, norm_zero, le_rfl]
#align convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset MeasureTheory.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) (hg : Continuous g)
{x t : G} {s u : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hu : -tsupport g + s ⊆ u) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ u.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖) t := by
refine convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset _ (fun i => ?_) hx hu
exact le_ciSup (hg.norm.bddAbove_range_of_hasCompactSupport hcg.norm) _
#align has_compact_support.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hg : Continuous g) {x t : G} {s : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ (-tsupport g + s).indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖) t :=
hcg.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset L hg hx Subset.rfl
#align has_compact_support.convolution_integrand_bound_right HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right
theorem _root_.Continuous.convolution_integrand_fst [ContinuousSub G] (hg : Continuous g) (t : G) :
Continuous fun x => L (f t) (g (x - t)) :=
L.continuous₂.comp₂ continuous_const <| hg.comp <| continuous_id.sub continuous_const
#align continuous.convolution_integrand_fst Continuous.convolution_integrand_fst
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_left (hcf : HasCompactSupport f)
(hf : Continuous f) {x t : G} {s : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖L (f (x - t)) (g t)‖ ≤
(-tsupport f + s).indicator (fun t => (‖L‖ * ⨆ i, ‖f i‖) * ‖g t‖) t := by
convert hcf.convolution_integrand_bound_right L.flip hf hx using 1
simp_rw [L.opNorm_flip, mul_right_comm]
#align has_compact_support.convolution_integrand_bound_left HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_left
end NoMeasurability
section Measurability
variable [MeasurableSpace G] {μ ν : Measure G}
/-- The convolution of `f` and `g` exists at `x` when the function `t ↦ L (f t) (g (x - t))` is
integrable. There are various conditions on `f` and `g` to prove this. -/
def ConvolutionExistsAt [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (x : G) (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Integrable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ
#align convolution_exists_at MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt
/-- The convolution of `f` and `g` exists when the function `t ↦ L (f t) (g (x - t))` is integrable
for all `x : G`. There are various conditions on `f` and `g` to prove this. -/
def ConvolutionExists [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : G, ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ
#align convolution_exists MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExists
section ConvolutionExists
variable {L} in
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable [Sub G] {x : G} (h : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ) :
Integrable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
h
#align convolution_exists_at.integrable MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable
section Group
variable [AddGroup G]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand' [MeasurableAdd₂ G]
[MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite ν] (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun p : G × G => p.1 - p.2) (μ.prod ν)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf.snd <| hg.comp_measurable measurable_sub
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand'
section
variable [MeasurableAdd G] [MeasurableNeg G]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd'
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {x : G}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x - t) μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf <| hg.comp_measurable <| measurable_id.const_sub x
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand_snd' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd'
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd' {x : G}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f <| map (fun t => x - t) μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ (hf.comp_measurable <| measurable_id.const_sub x) hg
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd'
/-- A sufficient condition to prove that `f ⋆[L, μ] g` exists.
We assume that `f` is integrable on a set `s` and `g` is bounded and ae strongly measurable
on `x₀ - s` (note that both properties hold if `g` is continuous with compact support). -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt' {x₀ : G} {s : Set G}
(hbg : BddAbove ((fun i => ‖g i‖) '' ((fun t => -t + x₀) ⁻¹' s))) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) ⊆ s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x₀ - t) (μ.restrict s)) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
rw [ConvolutionExistsAt]
rw [← integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset h2s]
set s' := (fun t => -t + x₀) ⁻¹' s
have : ∀ᵐ t : G ∂μ.restrict s,
‖L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))‖ ≤ s.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i : s', ‖g i‖) t := by
filter_upwards
refine le_indicator (fun t ht => ?_) fun t ht => ?_
· apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
refine (le_ciSup_set hbg <| mem_preimage.mpr ?_)
rwa [neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
· have : t ∉ support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)) := mt (fun h => h2s h) ht
rw [nmem_support.mp this, norm_zero]
refine Integrable.mono' ?_ ?_ this
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hs]; exact ((hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _).integrableOn
· exact hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd' L hmg
#align bdd_above.convolution_exists_at' BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt'
/-- If `‖f‖ *[μ] ‖g‖` exists, then `f *[L, μ] g` exists. -/
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm' {x₀ : G}
(h : ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) x₀ (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hmf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x₀ - t) μ) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine (h.const_mul ‖L‖).mono'
(hmf.convolution_integrand_snd' L hmg) (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [mul_apply', ← mul_assoc]
apply L.le_opNorm₂
#align convolution_exists_at.of_norm' MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm'
end
section Left
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (x : G) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
hf.convolution_integrand_snd' L <|
hg.mono_ac <| (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x).absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand_snd MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (x : G) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
(hf.mono_ac
(quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ
x).absolutelyContinuous).convolution_integrand_swap_snd'
L hg
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd
/-- If `‖f‖ *[μ] ‖g‖` exists, then `f *[L, μ] g` exists. -/
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm {x₀ : G}
(h : ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) x₀ (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hmf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ :=
h.ofNorm' L hmf <|
hmg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x₀).absolutelyContinuous
#align convolution_exists_at.of_norm MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm
end Left
section Right
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
[SigmaFinite ν]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.convolution_integrand' L <|
hg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_of_right_invariant μ ν).absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.convolution_integrand MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand
theorem Integrable.convolution_integrand (hf : Integrable f ν) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) := by
have h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand L hg.aestronglyMeasurable
have h2_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y : G => ∫ x : G, ‖L (f y) (g (x - y))‖ ∂μ) ν :=
h_meas.prod_swap.norm.integral_prod_right'
simp_rw [integrable_prod_iff' h_meas]
refine ⟨eventually_of_forall fun t => (L (f t)).integrable_comp (hg.comp_sub_right t), ?_⟩
refine Integrable.mono' ?_ h2_meas
(eventually_of_forall fun t => (?_ : _ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ∫ x, ‖g (x - t)‖ ∂μ))
· simp only [integral_sub_right_eq_self (‖g ·‖)]
exact (hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· simp_rw [← integral_mul_left]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
exact integral_mono_of_nonneg (eventually_of_forall fun t => norm_nonneg _)
((hg.comp_sub_right t).norm.const_mul _) (eventually_of_forall fun t => L.le_opNorm₂ _ _)
#align measure_theory.integrable.convolution_integrand MeasureTheory.Integrable.convolution_integrand
theorem Integrable.ae_convolution_exists (hf : Integrable f ν) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L ν :=
((integrable_prod_iff <|
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand L hg.aestronglyMeasurable).mp <|
hf.convolution_integrand L hg).1
#align measure_theory.integrable.ae_convolution_exists MeasureTheory.Integrable.ae_convolution_exists
end Right
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalAddGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt {x₀ : G}
(h : HasCompactSupport fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : Continuous g) : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
let u := (Homeomorph.neg G).trans (Homeomorph.addRight x₀)
let v := (Homeomorph.neg G).trans (Homeomorph.addLeft x₀)
apply ((u.isCompact_preimage.mpr h).bddAbove_image hg.norm.continuousOn).convolutionExistsAt' L
isClosed_closure.measurableSet subset_closure (hf.integrableOn_isCompact h)
have A : AEStronglyMeasurable (g ∘ v)
(μ.restrict (tsupport fun t : G => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)))) := by
apply (hg.comp v.continuous).continuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact h
exact (isClosed_tsupport _).measurableSet
convert ((v.continuous.measurable.measurePreserving
(μ.restrict (tsupport fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))))).aestronglyMeasurable_comp_iff
v.measurableEmbedding).1 A
ext x
simp only [v, Homeomorph.neg, sub_eq_add_neg, val_toAddUnits_apply, Homeomorph.trans_apply,
Equiv.neg_apply, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Homeomorph.homeomorph_mk_coe, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Homeomorph.coe_addLeft]
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_at HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := by
intro x₀
refine HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ hf hg
refine (hcg.comp_homeomorph (Homeomorph.subLeft x₀)).mono ?_
refine fun t => mt fun ht : g (x₀ - t) = 0 => ?_
simp_rw [ht, (L _).map_zero]
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_right HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) :
ConvolutionExists f g L μ := by
intro x₀
refine HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ hf hg
refine hcf.mono ?_
refine fun t => mt fun ht : f t = 0 => ?_
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_left_of_continuous_right HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G]
section MeasurableGroup
variable [MeasurableNeg G] [IsAddLeftInvariant μ]
/-- A sufficient condition to prove that `f ⋆[L, μ] g` exists.
We assume that the integrand has compact support and `g` is bounded on this support (note that
both properties hold if `g` is continuous with compact support). We also require that `f` is
integrable on the support of the integrand, and that both functions are strongly measurable.
This is a variant of `BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt'` in an abelian group with a left-invariant
measure. This allows us to state the boundedness and measurability of `g` in a more natural way. -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [SigmaFinite μ] {x₀ : G} {s : Set G}
(hbg : BddAbove ((fun i => ‖g i‖) '' ((fun t => x₀ - t) ⁻¹' s))) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) ⊆ s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt' L ?_ hs h2s hf ?_
· simp_rw [← sub_eq_neg_add, hbg]
· have : AEStronglyMeasurable g (map (fun t : G => x₀ - t) μ) :=
hmg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x₀).absolutelyContinuous
apply this.mono_measure
exact map_mono restrict_le_self (measurable_const.sub measurable_id')
#align bdd_above.convolution_exists_at BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt
variable {L} [MeasurableAdd G] [IsNegInvariant μ]
theorem convolutionExistsAt_flip :
ConvolutionExistsAt g f x L.flip μ ↔ ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ := by
simp_rw [ConvolutionExistsAt, ← integrable_comp_sub_left (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) x,
sub_sub_cancel, flip_apply]
#align convolution_exists_at_flip MeasureTheory.convolutionExistsAt_flip
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable_swap (h : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ) :
Integrable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ := by
convert h.comp_sub_left x
simp_rw [sub_sub_self]
#align convolution_exists_at.integrable_swap MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable_swap
theorem convolutionExistsAt_iff_integrable_swap :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ ↔ Integrable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
convolutionExistsAt_flip.symm
#align convolution_exists_at_iff_integrable_swap MeasureTheory.convolutionExistsAt_iff_integrable_swap
end MeasurableGroup
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalAddGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [IsNegInvariant μ]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsLeft
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := fun x₀ =>
convolutionExistsAt_flip.mp <| hcf.convolutionExists_right L.flip hg hf x₀
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_left HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsLeft
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsRightOfContinuousLeft (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := fun x₀ =>
convolutionExistsAt_flip.mp <| hcg.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right L.flip hg hf x₀
#align has_compact_support.convolution_exists_right_of_continuous_left HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsRightOfContinuousLeft
end CommGroup
end ConvolutionExists
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- The convolution of two functions `f` and `g` with respect to a continuous bilinear map `L` and
measure `μ`. It is defined to be `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ`. -/
noncomputable def convolution [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : G → F := fun x =>
∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ
#align convolution MeasureTheory.convolution
/-- The convolution of two functions with respect to a bilinear operation `L` and a measure `μ`. -/
scoped[Convolution] notation:67 f " ⋆[" L:67 ", " μ:67 "] " g:66 => convolution f g L μ
/-- The convolution of two functions with respect to a bilinear operation `L` and the volume. -/
scoped[Convolution]
notation:67 f " ⋆[" L:67 "]" g:66 => convolution f g L MeasureSpace.volume
/-- The convolution of two real-valued functions with respect to volume. -/
scoped[Convolution]
notation:67 f " ⋆ " g:66 =>
convolution f g (ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℝ) MeasureSpace.volume
open scoped Convolution
theorem convolution_def [Sub G] : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ :=
rfl
#align convolution_def MeasureTheory.convolution_def
/-- The definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is scalar multiplication.
Note: it often helps the elaborator to give the type of the convolution explicitly. -/
theorem convolution_lsmul [Sub G] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → F} :
(f ⋆[lsmul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g : G → F) x = ∫ t, f t • g (x - t) ∂μ :=
rfl
#align convolution_lsmul MeasureTheory.convolution_lsmul
/-- The definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_mul [Sub G] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → 𝕜} :
(f ⋆[mul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g) x = ∫ t, f t * g (x - t) ∂μ :=
rfl
#align convolution_mul MeasureTheory.convolution_mul
section Group
variable {L} [AddGroup G]
theorem smul_convolution [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] {y : 𝕜} : y • f ⋆[L, μ] g = y • (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
ext; simp only [Pi.smul_apply, convolution_def, ← integral_smul, L.map_smul₂]
#align smul_convolution MeasureTheory.smul_convolution
theorem convolution_smul [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] {y : 𝕜} : f ⋆[L, μ] y • g = y • (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
ext; simp only [Pi.smul_apply, convolution_def, ← integral_smul, (L _).map_smul]
#align convolution_smul MeasureTheory.convolution_smul
@[simp]
theorem zero_convolution : 0 ⋆[L, μ] g = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [convolution_def, Pi.zero_apply, L.map_zero₂, integral_zero]
#align zero_convolution MeasureTheory.zero_convolution
@[simp]
theorem convolution_zero : f ⋆[L, μ] 0 = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [convolution_def, Pi.zero_apply, (L _).map_zero, integral_zero]
#align convolution_zero MeasureTheory.convolution_zero
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add {x : G} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x L μ) :
(f ⋆[L, μ] (g + g')) x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x + (f ⋆[L, μ] g') x := by
simp only [convolution_def, (L _).map_add, Pi.add_apply, integral_add hfg hfg']
#align convolution_exists_at.distrib_add MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add
theorem ConvolutionExists.distrib_add (hfg : ConvolutionExists f g L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExists f g' L μ) : f ⋆[L, μ] (g + g') = f ⋆[L, μ] g + f ⋆[L, μ] g' := by
ext x
exact (hfg x).distrib_add (hfg' x)
#align convolution_exists.distrib_add MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExists.distrib_add
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.add_distrib {x : G} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f' g x L μ) :
((f + f') ⋆[L, μ] g) x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x + (f' ⋆[L, μ] g) x := by
simp only [convolution_def, L.map_add₂, Pi.add_apply, integral_add hfg hfg']
#align convolution_exists_at.add_distrib MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt.add_distrib
theorem ConvolutionExists.add_distrib (hfg : ConvolutionExists f g L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExists f' g L μ) : (f + f') ⋆[L, μ] g = f ⋆[L, μ] g + f' ⋆[L, μ] g := by
ext x
exact (hfg x).add_distrib (hfg' x)
#align convolution_exists.add_distrib MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExists.add_distrib
theorem convolution_mono_right {f g g' : G → ℝ} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ) (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ g' x) :
(f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x ≤ (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g') x := by
apply integral_mono hfg hfg'
simp only [lsmul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul]
intro t
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hg _) (hf _)
#align convolution_mono_right MeasureTheory.convolution_mono_right
theorem convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg {f g g' : G → ℝ}
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ) (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ g' x)
(hg' : ∀ x, 0 ≤ g' x) : (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x ≤ (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g') x := by
by_cases H : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ
· exact convolution_mono_right H hfg' hf hg
have : (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x = 0 := integral_undef H
rw [this]
exact integral_nonneg fun y => mul_nonneg (hf y) (hg' (x - y))
#align convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg
variable (L)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convolution.lean | 539 | 547 | theorem convolution_congr [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SigmaFinite μ]
[IsAddRightInvariant μ] (h1 : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (h2 : g =ᵐ[μ] g') : f ⋆[L, μ] g = f' ⋆[L, μ] g' := by |
ext x
apply integral_congr_ae
exact
(h1.prod_mk <|
h2.comp_tendsto
(quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x).tendsto_ae).fun_comp
↿fun x y => L x y
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposites
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Kleene
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Semiring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basic
#align_import algebra.algebra.operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"27b54c47c3137250a521aa64e9f1db90be5f6a26"
/-!
# Multiplication and division of submodules of an algebra.
An interface for multiplication and division of sub-R-modules of an R-algebra A is developed.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or semiring) and let `A` be an `R`-algebra.
* `1 : Submodule R A` : the R-submodule R of the R-algebra A
* `Mul (Submodule R A)` : multiplication of two sub-R-modules M and N of A is defined to be
the smallest submodule containing all the products `m * n`.
* `Div (Submodule R A)` : `I / J` is defined to be the submodule consisting of all `a : A` such
that `a • J ⊆ I`
It is proved that `Submodule R A` is a semiring, and also an algebra over `Set A`.
Additionally, in the `Pointwise` locale we promote `Submodule.pointwiseDistribMulAction` to a
`MulSemiringAction` as `Submodule.pointwiseMulSemiringAction`.
## Tags
multiplication of submodules, division of submodules, submodule semiring
-/
universe uι u v
open Algebra Set MulOpposite
open Pointwise
namespace SubMulAction
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) :=
⟨r, (algebraMap_eq_smul_one r).symm⟩
#align sub_mul_action.algebra_map_mem SubMulAction.algebraMap_mem
theorem mem_one' {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
#align sub_mul_action.mem_one' SubMulAction.mem_one'
end SubMulAction
namespace Submodule
variable {ι : Sort uι}
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R]
section Ring
variable {A : Type v} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (S T : Set A) {M N P Q : Submodule R A} {m n : A}
/-- `1 : Submodule R A` is the submodule R of A. -/
instance one : One (Submodule R A) :=
-- Porting note: `f.range` notation doesn't work
⟨LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A)⟩
#align submodule.has_one Submodule.one
theorem one_eq_range : (1 : Submodule R A) = LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A) :=
rfl
#align submodule.one_eq_range Submodule.one_eq_range
theorem le_one_toAddSubmonoid : 1 ≤ (1 : Submodule R A).toAddSubmonoid := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, map_natCast (algebraMap R A) n⟩
#align submodule.le_one_to_add_submonoid Submodule.le_one_toAddSubmonoid
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : Submodule R A) :=
LinearMap.mem_range_self (Algebra.linearMap R A) _
#align submodule.algebra_map_mem Submodule.algebraMap_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_one {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : Submodule R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_one Submodule.mem_one
@[simp]
theorem toSubMulAction_one : (1 : Submodule R A).toSubMulAction = 1 :=
SetLike.ext fun _ => mem_one.trans SubMulAction.mem_one'.symm
#align submodule.to_sub_mul_action_one Submodule.toSubMulAction_one
theorem one_eq_span : (1 : Submodule R A) = R ∙ 1 := by
apply Submodule.ext
intro a
simp only [mem_one, mem_span_singleton, Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
#align submodule.one_eq_span Submodule.one_eq_span
theorem one_eq_span_one_set : (1 : Submodule R A) = span R 1 :=
one_eq_span
#align submodule.one_eq_span_one_set Submodule.one_eq_span_one_set
theorem one_le : (1 : Submodule R A) ≤ P ↔ (1 : A) ∈ P := by
-- Porting note: simpa no longer closes refl goals, so added `SetLike.mem_coe`
simp only [one_eq_span, span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
#align submodule.one_le Submodule.one_le
protected theorem map_one {A'} [Semiring A'] [Algebra R A'] (f : A →ₐ[R] A') :
map f.toLinearMap (1 : Submodule R A) = 1 := by
ext
simp
#align submodule.map_one Submodule.map_one
@[simp]
theorem map_op_one :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (1 : Submodule R A) = 1 := by
ext x
induction x using MulOpposite.rec'
simp
#align submodule.map_op_one Submodule.map_op_one
@[simp]
theorem comap_op_one :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (1 : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) = 1 := by
ext
simp
#align submodule.comap_op_one Submodule.comap_op_one
@[simp]
theorem map_unop_one :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (1 : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) = 1 := by
rw [← comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, comap_op_one]
#align submodule.map_unop_one Submodule.map_unop_one
@[simp]
theorem comap_unop_one :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (1 : Submodule R A) = 1 := by
rw [← map_equiv_eq_comap_symm, map_op_one]
#align submodule.comap_unop_one Submodule.comap_unop_one
/-- Multiplication of sub-R-modules of an R-algebra A. The submodule `M * N` is the
smallest R-submodule of `A` containing the elements `m * n` for `m ∈ M` and `n ∈ N`. -/
instance mul : Mul (Submodule R A) :=
⟨Submodule.map₂ <| LinearMap.mul R A⟩
#align submodule.has_mul Submodule.mul
theorem mul_mem_mul (hm : m ∈ M) (hn : n ∈ N) : m * n ∈ M * N :=
apply_mem_map₂ _ hm hn
#align submodule.mul_mem_mul Submodule.mul_mem_mul
theorem mul_le : M * N ≤ P ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, m * n ∈ P :=
map₂_le
#align submodule.mul_le Submodule.mul_le
theorem mul_toAddSubmonoid (M N : Submodule R A) :
(M * N).toAddSubmonoid = M.toAddSubmonoid * N.toAddSubmonoid := by
dsimp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul] -- Porting note: added `hMul`
rw [map₂, iSup_toAddSubmonoid]
rfl
#align submodule.mul_to_add_submonoid Submodule.mul_toAddSubmonoid
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem mul_induction_on {C : A → Prop} {r : A} (hr : r ∈ M * N)
(hm : ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, C (m * n)) (ha : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C r := by
rw [← mem_toAddSubmonoid, mul_toAddSubmonoid] at hr
exact AddSubmonoid.mul_induction_on hr hm ha
#align submodule.mul_induction_on Submodule.mul_induction_on
/-- A dependent version of `mul_induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem mul_induction_on' {C : ∀ r, r ∈ M * N → Prop}
(mem_mul_mem : ∀ m (hm : m ∈ M) n (hn : n ∈ N), C (m * n) (mul_mem_mul hm hn))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, C x hx → C y hy → C (x + y) (add_mem hx hy)) {r : A} (hr : r ∈ M * N) :
C r hr := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hr : r ∈ M * N) (hc : C r hr) => hc
exact
Submodule.mul_induction_on hr
(fun x hx y hy => ⟨_, mem_mul_mem _ hx _ hy⟩)
fun x y ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ => ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩
#align submodule.mul_induction_on' Submodule.mul_induction_on'
variable (R)
theorem span_mul_span : span R S * span R T = span R (S * T) :=
map₂_span_span _ _ _ _
#align submodule.span_mul_span Submodule.span_mul_span
variable {R}
variable (M N P Q)
@[simp]
theorem mul_bot : M * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right _ _
#align submodule.mul_bot Submodule.mul_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * M = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left _ _
#align submodule.bot_mul Submodule.bot_mul
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this once we have a monoid structure
protected theorem one_mul : (1 : Submodule R A) * M = M := by
conv_lhs => rw [one_eq_span, ← span_eq M]
erw [span_mul_span, one_mul, span_eq]
#align submodule.one_mul Submodule.one_mul
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this once we have a monoid structure
protected theorem mul_one : M * 1 = M := by
conv_lhs => rw [one_eq_span, ← span_eq M]
erw [span_mul_span, mul_one, span_eq]
#align submodule.mul_one Submodule.mul_one
variable {M N P Q}
@[mono]
theorem mul_le_mul (hmp : M ≤ P) (hnq : N ≤ Q) : M * N ≤ P * Q :=
map₂_le_map₂ hmp hnq
#align submodule.mul_le_mul Submodule.mul_le_mul
theorem mul_le_mul_left (h : M ≤ N) : M * P ≤ N * P :=
map₂_le_map₂_left h
#align submodule.mul_le_mul_left Submodule.mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_le_mul_right (h : N ≤ P) : M * N ≤ M * P :=
map₂_le_map₂_right h
#align submodule.mul_le_mul_right Submodule.mul_le_mul_right
variable (M N P)
theorem mul_sup : M * (N ⊔ P) = M * N ⊔ M * P :=
map₂_sup_right _ _ _ _
#align submodule.mul_sup Submodule.mul_sup
theorem sup_mul : (M ⊔ N) * P = M * P ⊔ N * P :=
map₂_sup_left _ _ _ _
#align submodule.sup_mul Submodule.sup_mul
theorem mul_subset_mul : (↑M : Set A) * (↑N : Set A) ⊆ (↑(M * N) : Set A) :=
image2_subset_map₂ (Algebra.lmul R A).toLinearMap M N
#align submodule.mul_subset_mul Submodule.mul_subset_mul
protected theorem map_mul {A'} [Semiring A'] [Algebra R A'] (f : A →ₐ[R] A') :
map f.toLinearMap (M * N) = map f.toLinearMap M * map f.toLinearMap N :=
calc
map f.toLinearMap (M * N) = ⨆ i : M, (N.map (LinearMap.mul R A i)).map f.toLinearMap :=
map_iSup _ _
_ = map f.toLinearMap M * map f.toLinearMap N := by
apply congr_arg sSup
ext S
constructor <;> rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
· use ⟨f y, mem_map.mpr ⟨y.1, y.2, rfl⟩⟩ -- Porting note: added `⟨⟩`
refine Eq.trans ?_ hy
ext
simp
· obtain ⟨y', hy', fy_eq⟩ := mem_map.mp y.2
use ⟨y', hy'⟩ -- Porting note: added `⟨⟩`
refine Eq.trans ?_ hy
rw [f.toLinearMap_apply] at fy_eq
ext
simp [fy_eq]
#align submodule.map_mul Submodule.map_mul
theorem map_op_mul :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (M * N) =
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) N *
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) M := by
apply le_antisymm
· simp_rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]
refine mul_le.2 fun m hm n hn => ?_
rw [mem_comap, map_equiv_eq_comap_symm, map_equiv_eq_comap_symm]
show op n * op m ∈ _
exact mul_mem_mul hn hm
· refine mul_le.2 (MulOpposite.rec' fun m hm => MulOpposite.rec' fun n hn => ?_)
rw [Submodule.mem_map_equiv] at hm hn ⊢
exact mul_mem_mul hn hm
#align submodule.map_op_mul Submodule.map_op_mul
theorem comap_unop_mul :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (M * N) =
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) N *
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) M := by
simp_rw [← map_equiv_eq_comap_symm, map_op_mul]
#align submodule.comap_unop_mul Submodule.comap_unop_mul
theorem map_unop_mul (M N : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (M * N) =
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) N *
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) M :=
have : Function.Injective (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) :=
LinearEquiv.injective _
map_injective_of_injective this <| by
rw [← map_comp, map_op_mul, ← map_comp, ← map_comp, LinearEquiv.comp_coe,
LinearEquiv.symm_trans_self, LinearEquiv.refl_toLinearMap, map_id, map_id, map_id]
#align submodule.map_unop_mul Submodule.map_unop_mul
theorem comap_op_mul (M N : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (M * N) =
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) N *
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) M := by
simp_rw [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_unop_mul]
#align submodule.comap_op_mul Submodule.comap_op_mul
lemma restrictScalars_mul {A B C} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Semiring C]
[Algebra A B] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C] {I J : Submodule B C} :
(I * J).restrictScalars A = I.restrictScalars A * J.restrictScalars A := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro x (hx : x ∈ I * J)
refine Submodule.mul_induction_on hx ?_ ?_
· exact fun m hm n hn ↦ mul_mem_mul hm hn
· exact fun _ _ ↦ add_mem
· exact mul_le.mpr (fun _ hm _ hn ↦ mul_mem_mul hm hn)
section
open Pointwise
/-- `Submodule.pointwiseNeg` distributes over multiplication.
This is available as an instance in the `Pointwise` locale. -/
protected def hasDistribPointwiseNeg {A} [Ring A] [Algebra R A] : HasDistribNeg (Submodule R A) :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective.hasDistribNeg _ neg_toAddSubmonoid mul_toAddSubmonoid
#align submodule.has_distrib_pointwise_neg Submodule.hasDistribPointwiseNeg
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Submodule.hasDistribPointwiseNeg
end
section DecidableEq
open scoped Classical
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_span_mul {R A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Mul A]
[Module R A] {S : Set A} {S' : Set A} {x : A} (hx : x ∈ span R (S * S')) :
∃ T T' : Finset A, ↑T ⊆ S ∧ ↑T' ⊆ S' ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set A) := by
obtain ⟨U, h, hU⟩ := mem_span_finite_of_mem_span hx
obtain ⟨T, T', hS, hS', h⟩ := Finset.subset_mul h
use T, T', hS, hS'
have h' : (U : Set A) ⊆ T * T' := by assumption_mod_cast
have h'' := span_mono h' hU
assumption
#align submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_span_mul Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_span_mul
end DecidableEq
theorem mul_eq_span_mul_set (s t : Submodule R A) : s * t = span R ((s : Set A) * (t : Set A)) :=
map₂_eq_span_image2 _ s t
#align submodule.mul_eq_span_mul_set Submodule.mul_eq_span_mul_set
theorem iSup_mul (s : ι → Submodule R A) (t : Submodule R A) : (⨆ i, s i) * t = ⨆ i, s i * t :=
map₂_iSup_left _ s t
#align submodule.supr_mul Submodule.iSup_mul
theorem mul_iSup (t : Submodule R A) (s : ι → Submodule R A) : (t * ⨆ i, s i) = ⨆ i, t * s i :=
map₂_iSup_right _ t s
#align submodule.mul_supr Submodule.mul_iSup
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {P Q : Submodule R A} {x : A} (hx : x ∈ P * Q) :
∃ T T' : Finset A, (T : Set A) ⊆ P ∧ (T' : Set A) ⊆ Q ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set A) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_span_mul
(by rwa [← Submodule.span_eq P, ← Submodule.span_eq Q, Submodule.span_mul_span] at hx)
#align submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul
variable {M N P}
theorem mem_span_singleton_mul {x y : A} : x ∈ span R {y} * P ↔ ∃ z ∈ P, y * z = x := by
-- Porting note: need both `*` and `Mul.mul`
simp_rw [(· * ·), Mul.mul, map₂_span_singleton_eq_map]
rfl
#align submodule.mem_span_singleton_mul Submodule.mem_span_singleton_mul
theorem mem_mul_span_singleton {x y : A} : x ∈ P * span R {y} ↔ ∃ z ∈ P, z * y = x := by
-- Porting note: need both `*` and `Mul.mul`
simp_rw [(· * ·), Mul.mul, map₂_span_singleton_eq_map_flip]
rfl
#align submodule.mem_mul_span_singleton Submodule.mem_mul_span_singleton
lemma span_singleton_mul {x : A} {p : Submodule R A} :
Submodule.span R {x} * p = x • p := ext fun _ ↦ mem_span_singleton_mul
lemma mem_smul_iff_inv_mul_mem {S} [Field S] [Algebra R S] {x : S} {p : Submodule R S} {y : S}
(hx : x ≠ 0) : y ∈ x • p ↔ x⁻¹ * y ∈ p := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha : a ∈ p, rfl⟩; simpa [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx]
· exact fun h ↦ ⟨_, h, by simp [mul_inv_cancel_left₀ hx]⟩
lemma mul_mem_smul_iff {S} [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] {x : S} {p : Submodule R S} {y : S}
(hx : x ∈ nonZeroDivisors S) :
x * y ∈ x • p ↔ y ∈ p :=
show Exists _ ↔ _ by simp [mul_cancel_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors hx]
variable (M N) in
theorem mul_smul_mul_eq_smul_mul_smul (x y : R) : (x * y) • (M * N) = (x • M) * (y • N) := by
ext
refine ⟨?_, fun hx ↦ Submodule.mul_induction_on hx ?_ fun _ _ hx hy ↦ Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy⟩
· rintro ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
rw [DistribMulAction.toLinearMap_apply]
refine Submodule.mul_induction_on hx (fun m hm n hn ↦ ?_) (fun _ _ hn hm ↦ ?_)
· rw [← smul_mul_smul x y m n]
exact mul_mem_mul (smul_mem_pointwise_smul m x M hm) (smul_mem_pointwise_smul n y N hn)
· rw [smul_add]
exact Submodule.add_mem _ hn hm
· rintro _ ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩ _ ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
erw [smul_mul_smul x y m n]
exact smul_mem_pointwise_smul _ _ _ (mul_mem_mul hm hn)
/-- Sub-R-modules of an R-algebra form an idempotent semiring. -/
instance idemSemiring : IdemSemiring (Submodule R A) :=
{ toAddSubmonoid_injective.semigroup _ fun m n : Submodule R A => mul_toAddSubmonoid m n,
AddMonoidWithOne.unary, Submodule.pointwiseAddCommMonoid,
(by infer_instance :
Lattice (Submodule R A)) with
one_mul := Submodule.one_mul
mul_one := Submodule.mul_one
zero_mul := bot_mul
mul_zero := mul_bot
left_distrib := mul_sup
right_distrib := sup_mul,
-- Porting note: removed `(by infer_instance : OrderBot (Submodule R A))`
bot_le := fun _ => bot_le }
variable (M)
theorem span_pow (s : Set A) : ∀ n : ℕ, span R s ^ n = span R (s ^ n)
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, one_eq_span_one_set]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, span_pow s n, span_mul_span]
#align submodule.span_pow Submodule.span_pow
theorem pow_eq_span_pow_set (n : ℕ) : M ^ n = span R ((M : Set A) ^ n) := by
rw [← span_pow, span_eq]
#align submodule.pow_eq_span_pow_set Submodule.pow_eq_span_pow_set
theorem pow_subset_pow {n : ℕ} : (↑M : Set A) ^ n ⊆ ↑(M ^ n : Submodule R A) :=
(pow_eq_span_pow_set M n).symm ▸ subset_span
#align submodule.pow_subset_pow Submodule.pow_subset_pow
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : A} (hx : x ∈ M) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ M ^ n :=
pow_subset_pow _ <| Set.pow_mem_pow hx _
#align submodule.pow_mem_pow Submodule.pow_mem_pow
theorem pow_toAddSubmonoid {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (M ^ n).toAddSubmonoid = M.toAddSubmonoid ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact (h rfl).elim
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, mul_toAddSubmonoid]
cases n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul, ← mul_toAddSubmonoid, one_mul]
| succ n => rw [ih n.succ_ne_zero]
#align submodule.pow_to_add_submonoid Submodule.pow_toAddSubmonoid
theorem le_pow_toAddSubmonoid {n : ℕ} : M.toAddSubmonoid ^ n ≤ (M ^ n).toAddSubmonoid := by
obtain rfl | hn := Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
exact le_one_toAddSubmonoid
· exact (pow_toAddSubmonoid M hn).ge
#align submodule.le_pow_to_add_submonoid Submodule.le_pow_toAddSubmonoid
/-- Dependent version of `Submodule.pow_induction_on_left`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem pow_induction_on_left' {C : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), x ∈ M ^ n → Prop}
(algebraMap : ∀ r : R, C 0 (algebraMap _ _ r) (algebraMap_mem r))
(add : ∀ x y i hx hy, C i x hx → C i y hy → C i (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›))
(mem_mul : ∀ m (hm : m ∈ M), ∀ (i x hx), C i x hx → C i.succ (m * x)
((pow_succ' M i).symm ▸ (mul_mem_mul hm hx)))
-- Porting note: swapped argument order to match order of `C`
{n : ℕ} {x : A}
(hx : x ∈ M ^ n) : C n x hx := by
induction' n with n n_ih generalizing x
· rw [pow_zero] at hx
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := hx
exact algebraMap r
revert hx
simp_rw [pow_succ']
intro hx
exact
Submodule.mul_induction_on' (fun m hm x ih => mem_mul _ hm _ _ _ (n_ih ih))
(fun x hx y hy Cx Cy => add _ _ _ _ _ Cx Cy) hx
#align submodule.pow_induction_on_left' Submodule.pow_induction_on_left'
/-- Dependent version of `Submodule.pow_induction_on_right`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem pow_induction_on_right' {C : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), x ∈ M ^ n → Prop}
(algebraMap : ∀ r : R, C 0 (algebraMap _ _ r) (algebraMap_mem r))
(add : ∀ x y i hx hy, C i x hx → C i y hy → C i (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›))
(mul_mem :
∀ i x hx, C i x hx →
∀ m (hm : m ∈ M), C i.succ (x * m) (mul_mem_mul hx hm))
-- Porting note: swapped argument order to match order of `C`
{n : ℕ} {x : A} (hx : x ∈ M ^ n) : C n x hx := by
induction' n with n n_ih generalizing x
· rw [pow_zero] at hx
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := hx
exact algebraMap r
revert hx
simp_rw [pow_succ]
intro hx
exact
Submodule.mul_induction_on' (fun m hm x ih => mul_mem _ _ hm (n_ih _) _ ih)
(fun x hx y hy Cx Cy => add _ _ _ _ _ Cx Cy) hx
#align submodule.pow_induction_on_right' Submodule.pow_induction_on_right'
/-- To show a property on elements of `M ^ n` holds, it suffices to show that it holds for scalars,
is closed under addition, and holds for `m * x` where `m ∈ M` and it holds for `x` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem pow_induction_on_left {C : A → Prop} (hr : ∀ r : R, C (algebraMap _ _ r))
(hadd : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) (hmul : ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ (x), C x → C (m * x)) {x : A} {n : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ M ^ n) : C x :=
-- Porting note: `M` is explicit yet can't be passed positionally!
Submodule.pow_induction_on_left' (M := M) (C := fun _ a _ => C a) hr
(fun x y _i _hx _hy => hadd x y)
(fun _m hm _i _x _hx => hmul _ hm _) hx
#align submodule.pow_induction_on_left Submodule.pow_induction_on_left
/-- To show a property on elements of `M ^ n` holds, it suffices to show that it holds for scalars,
is closed under addition, and holds for `x * m` where `m ∈ M` and it holds for `x` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem pow_induction_on_right {C : A → Prop} (hr : ∀ r : R, C (algebraMap _ _ r))
(hadd : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) (hmul : ∀ x, C x → ∀ m ∈ M, C (x * m)) {x : A} {n : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ M ^ n) : C x :=
Submodule.pow_induction_on_right' (M := M) (C := fun _ a _ => C a) hr
(fun x y _i _hx _hy => hadd x y)
(fun _i _x _hx => hmul _) hx
#align submodule.pow_induction_on_right Submodule.pow_induction_on_right
/-- `Submonoid.map` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom`, when applied to `AlgHom`s. -/
@[simps]
def mapHom {A'} [Semiring A'] [Algebra R A'] (f : A →ₐ[R] A') :
Submodule R A →*₀ Submodule R A' where
toFun := map f.toLinearMap
map_zero' := Submodule.map_bot _
map_one' := Submodule.map_one _
map_mul' _ _ := Submodule.map_mul _ _ _
#align submodule.map_hom Submodule.mapHom
/-- The ring of submodules of the opposite algebra is isomorphic to the opposite ring of
submodules. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivOpposite : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Submodule R A)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun p := op <| p.comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ)
invFun p := p.unop.comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A)
left_inv p := SetLike.coe_injective <| rfl
right_inv p := unop_injective <| SetLike.coe_injective rfl
map_add' p q := by simp [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, ← op_add]
map_mul' p q := congr_arg op <| comap_op_mul _ _
#align submodule.equiv_opposite Submodule.equivOpposite
protected theorem map_pow {A'} [Semiring A'] [Algebra R A'] (f : A →ₐ[R] A') (n : ℕ) :
map f.toLinearMap (M ^ n) = map f.toLinearMap M ^ n :=
map_pow (mapHom f) M n
#align submodule.map_pow Submodule.map_pow
theorem comap_unop_pow (n : ℕ) :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (M ^ n) =
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) M ^ n :=
(equivOpposite : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* _).symm.map_pow (op M) n
#align submodule.comap_unop_pow Submodule.comap_unop_pow
theorem comap_op_pow (n : ℕ) (M : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (M ^ n) =
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) M ^ n :=
op_injective <| (equivOpposite : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* _).map_pow M n
#align submodule.comap_op_pow Submodule.comap_op_pow
theorem map_op_pow (n : ℕ) :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (M ^ n) =
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) M ^ n := by
rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm, map_equiv_eq_comap_symm, comap_unop_pow]
#align submodule.map_op_pow Submodule.map_op_pow
theorem map_unop_pow (n : ℕ) (M : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (M ^ n) =
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) M ^ n := by
rw [← comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, ← comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, comap_op_pow]
#align submodule.map_unop_pow Submodule.map_unop_pow
/-- `span` is a semiring homomorphism (recall multiplication is pointwise multiplication of subsets
on either side). -/
@[simps]
def span.ringHom : SetSemiring A →+* Submodule R A where
-- Note: the hint `(α := A)` is new in #8386
toFun s := Submodule.span R (SetSemiring.down (α := A) s)
map_zero' := span_empty
map_one' := one_eq_span.symm
map_add' := span_union
map_mul' s t := by
dsimp only -- Porting note: new, needed due to new-style structures
rw [SetSemiring.down_mul, span_mul_span]
#align submodule.span.ring_hom Submodule.span.ringHom
section
variable {α : Type*} [Monoid α] [MulSemiringAction α A] [SMulCommClass α R A]
/-- The action on a submodule corresponding to applying the action to every element.
This is available as an instance in the `Pointwise` locale.
This is a stronger version of `Submodule.pointwiseDistribMulAction`. -/
protected def pointwiseMulSemiringAction : MulSemiringAction α (Submodule R A) :=
{
Submodule.pointwiseDistribMulAction with
smul_mul := fun r x y => Submodule.map_mul x y <| MulSemiringAction.toAlgHom R A r
smul_one := fun r => Submodule.map_one <| MulSemiringAction.toAlgHom R A r }
#align submodule.pointwise_mul_semiring_action Submodule.pointwiseMulSemiringAction
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Submodule.pointwiseMulSemiringAction
end
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {A : Type v} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable {M N : Submodule R A} {m n : A}
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev (hm : m ∈ M) (hn : n ∈ N) : n * m ∈ M * N :=
mul_comm m n ▸ mul_mem_mul hm hn
#align submodule.mul_mem_mul_rev Submodule.mul_mem_mul_rev
variable (M N)
protected theorem mul_comm : M * N = N * M :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 fun _r hrm _s hsn => mul_mem_mul_rev hsn hrm)
(mul_le.2 fun _r hrn _s hsm => mul_mem_mul_rev hsm hrn)
#align submodule.mul_comm Submodule.mul_comm
/-- Sub-R-modules of an R-algebra A form a semiring. -/
instance : IdemCommSemiring (Submodule R A) :=
{ Submodule.idemSemiring with mul_comm := Submodule.mul_comm }
theorem prod_span {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Set A) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Submodule.span R (M i)) = Submodule.span R (∏ i ∈ s, M i) := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp [one_eq_span, Set.singleton_one]
· intro _ _ H ih
rw [Finset.prod_insert H, Finset.prod_insert H, ih, span_mul_span]
#align submodule.prod_span Submodule.prod_span
theorem prod_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (x : ι → A) :
(∏ i ∈ s, span R ({x i} : Set A)) = span R {∏ i ∈ s, x i} := by
rw [prod_span, Set.finset_prod_singleton]
#align submodule.prod_span_singleton Submodule.prod_span_singleton
variable (R A)
/-- R-submodules of the R-algebra A are a module over `Set A`. -/
instance moduleSet : Module (SetSemiring A) (Submodule R A) where
-- Porting note: have to unfold both `HSMul.hSMul` and `SMul.smul`
-- Note: the hint `(α := A)` is new in #8386
smul s P := span R (SetSemiring.down (α := A) s) * P
smul_add _ _ _ := mul_add _ _ _
add_smul s t P := by
simp_rw [HSMul.hSMul, SetSemiring.down_add, span_union, sup_mul, add_eq_sup]
mul_smul s t P := by
simp_rw [HSMul.hSMul, SetSemiring.down_mul, ← mul_assoc, span_mul_span]
one_smul P := by
simp_rw [HSMul.hSMul, SetSemiring.down_one, ← one_eq_span_one_set, one_mul]
zero_smul P := by
simp_rw [HSMul.hSMul, SetSemiring.down_zero, span_empty, bot_mul, bot_eq_zero]
smul_zero _ := mul_bot _
#align submodule.module_set Submodule.moduleSet
variable {R A}
theorem smul_def (s : SetSemiring A) (P : Submodule R A) :
s • P = span R (SetSemiring.down (α := A) s) * P :=
rfl
#align submodule.smul_def Submodule.smul_def
theorem smul_le_smul {s t : SetSemiring A} {M N : Submodule R A}
(h₁ : SetSemiring.down (α := A) s ⊆ SetSemiring.down (α := A) t)
(h₂ : M ≤ N) : s • M ≤ t • N :=
mul_le_mul (span_mono h₁) h₂
#align submodule.smul_le_smul Submodule.smul_le_smul
theorem singleton_smul (a : A) (M : Submodule R A) :
Set.up ({a} : Set A) • M = M.map (LinearMap.mulLeft R a) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq M]
rw [smul_def, SetSemiring.down_up, span_mul_span, singleton_mul]
exact (map (LinearMap.mulLeft R a) M).span_eq
#align submodule.smul_singleton Submodule.singleton_smul
section Quotient
/-- The elements of `I / J` are the `x` such that `x • J ⊆ I`.
In fact, we define `x ∈ I / J` to be `∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I` (see `mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem`),
which is equivalent to `x • J ⊆ I` (see `mem_div_iff_smul_subset`), but nicer to use in proofs.
This is the general form of the ideal quotient, traditionally written $I : J$.
-/
instance : Div (Submodule R A) :=
⟨fun I J =>
{ carrier := { x | ∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I }
zero_mem' := fun y _ => by
rw [zero_mul]
apply Submodule.zero_mem
add_mem' := fun ha hb y hy => by
rw [add_mul]
exact Submodule.add_mem _ (ha _ hy) (hb _ hy)
smul_mem' := fun r x hx y hy => by
rw [Algebra.smul_mul_assoc]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (hx _ hy) }⟩
theorem mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem {x : A} {I J : Submodule R A} : x ∈ I / J ↔ ∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I :=
Iff.refl _
#align submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem
theorem mem_div_iff_smul_subset {x : A} {I J : Submodule R A} : x ∈ I / J ↔ x • (J : Set A) ⊆ I :=
⟨fun h y ⟨y', hy', xy'_eq_y⟩ => by
rw [← xy'_eq_y]
apply h
assumption, fun h y hy => h (Set.smul_mem_smul_set hy)⟩
#align submodule.mem_div_iff_smul_subset Submodule.mem_div_iff_smul_subset
theorem le_div_iff {I J K : Submodule R A} : I ≤ J / K ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ z ∈ K, x * z ∈ J :=
Iff.refl _
#align submodule.le_div_iff Submodule.le_div_iff
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {I J K : Submodule R A} : I ≤ J / K ↔ I * K ≤ J := by
rw [le_div_iff, mul_le]
#align submodule.le_div_iff_mul_le Submodule.le_div_iff_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem one_le_one_div {I : Submodule R A} : 1 ≤ 1 / I ↔ I ≤ 1 := by
constructor; all_goals intro hI
· rwa [le_div_iff_mul_le, one_mul] at hI
· rwa [le_div_iff_mul_le, one_mul]
#align submodule.one_le_one_div Submodule.one_le_one_div
theorem le_self_mul_one_div {I : Submodule R A} (hI : I ≤ 1) : I ≤ I * (1 / I) := by
refine (mul_one I).symm.trans_le ?_ -- Porting note: drop `rw {occs := _}` in favor of `refine`
apply mul_le_mul_right (one_le_one_div.mpr hI)
#align submodule.le_self_mul_one_div Submodule.le_self_mul_one_div
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Operations.lean | 750 | 755 | theorem mul_one_div_le_one {I : Submodule R A} : I * (1 / I) ≤ 1 := by |
rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intro m hm n hn
rw [Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem] at hn
rw [mul_comm]
exact hn m hm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Init.Order.LinearOrder
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.Cases
import Mathlib.Order.Notation
#align_import order.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"90df25ded755a2cf9651ea850d1abe429b1e4eb1"
/-!
# Basic definitions about `≤` and `<`
This file proves basic results about orders, provides extensive dot notation, defines useful order
classes and allows to transfer order instances.
## Type synonyms
* `OrderDual α` : A type synonym reversing the meaning of all inequalities, with notation `αᵒᵈ`.
* `AsLinearOrder α`: A type synonym to promote `PartialOrder α` to `LinearOrder α` using
`IsTotal α (≤)`.
### Transferring orders
- `Order.Preimage`, `Preorder.lift`: Transfers a (pre)order on `β` to an order on `α`
using a function `f : α → β`.
- `PartialOrder.lift`, `LinearOrder.lift`: Transfers a partial (resp., linear) order on `β` to a
partial (resp., linear) order on `α` using an injective function `f`.
### Extra class
* `DenselyOrdered`: An order with no gap, i.e. for any two elements `a < b` there exists `c` such
that `a < c < b`.
## Notes
`≤` and `<` are highly favored over `≥` and `>` in mathlib. The reason is that we can formulate all
lemmas using `≤`/`<`, and `rw` has trouble unifying `≤` and `≥`. Hence choosing one direction spares
us useless duplication. This is enforced by a linter. See Note [nolint_ge] for more infos.
Dot notation is particularly useful on `≤` (`LE.le`) and `<` (`LT.lt`). To that end, we
provide many aliases to dot notation-less lemmas. For example, `le_trans` is aliased with
`LE.le.trans` and can be used to construct `hab.trans hbc : a ≤ c` when `hab : a ≤ b`,
`hbc : b ≤ c`, `lt_of_le_of_lt` is aliased as `LE.le.trans_lt` and can be used to construct
`hab.trans hbc : a < c` when `hab : a ≤ b`, `hbc : b < c`.
## TODO
- expand module docs
- automatic construction of dual definitions / theorems
## Tags
preorder, order, partial order, poset, linear order, chain
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a b c : α}
theorem le_trans' : b ≤ c → a ≤ b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_trans
#align le_trans' le_trans'
theorem lt_trans' : b < c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_trans
#align lt_trans' lt_trans'
theorem lt_of_le_of_lt' : b ≤ c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_lt_of_le
#align lt_of_le_of_lt' lt_of_le_of_lt'
theorem lt_of_lt_of_le' : b < c → a ≤ b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_le_of_lt
#align lt_of_lt_of_le' lt_of_lt_of_le'
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem ge_antisymm : a ≤ b → b ≤ a → b = a :=
flip le_antisymm
#align ge_antisymm ge_antisymm
theorem lt_of_le_of_ne' : a ≤ b → b ≠ a → a < b := fun h₁ h₂ ↦ lt_of_le_of_ne h₁ h₂.symm
#align lt_of_le_of_ne' lt_of_le_of_ne'
theorem Ne.lt_of_le : a ≠ b → a ≤ b → a < b :=
flip lt_of_le_of_ne
#align ne.lt_of_le Ne.lt_of_le
theorem Ne.lt_of_le' : b ≠ a → a ≤ b → a < b :=
flip lt_of_le_of_ne'
#align ne.lt_of_le' Ne.lt_of_le'
end PartialOrder
attribute [simp] le_refl
attribute [ext] LE
alias LE.le.trans := le_trans
alias LE.le.trans' := le_trans'
alias LE.le.trans_lt := lt_of_le_of_lt
alias LE.le.trans_lt' := lt_of_le_of_lt'
alias LE.le.antisymm := le_antisymm
alias LE.le.antisymm' := ge_antisymm
alias LE.le.lt_of_ne := lt_of_le_of_ne
alias LE.le.lt_of_ne' := lt_of_le_of_ne'
alias LE.le.lt_of_not_le := lt_of_le_not_le
alias LE.le.lt_or_eq := lt_or_eq_of_le
alias LE.le.lt_or_eq_dec := Decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le
alias LT.lt.le := le_of_lt
alias LT.lt.trans := lt_trans
alias LT.lt.trans' := lt_trans'
alias LT.lt.trans_le := lt_of_lt_of_le
alias LT.lt.trans_le' := lt_of_lt_of_le'
alias LT.lt.ne := ne_of_lt
#align has_lt.lt.ne LT.lt.ne
alias LT.lt.asymm := lt_asymm
alias LT.lt.not_lt := lt_asymm
alias Eq.le := le_of_eq
#align eq.le Eq.le
-- Porting note: no `decidable_classical` linter
-- attribute [nolint decidable_classical] LE.le.lt_or_eq_dec
section
variable [Preorder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem lt_self_iff_false (x : α) : x < x ↔ False :=
⟨lt_irrefl x, False.elim⟩
#align lt_self_iff_false lt_self_iff_false
#align le_of_le_of_eq le_of_le_of_eq
#align le_of_eq_of_le le_of_eq_of_le
#align lt_of_lt_of_eq lt_of_lt_of_eq
#align lt_of_eq_of_lt lt_of_eq_of_lt
theorem le_of_le_of_eq' : b ≤ c → a = b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_of_eq_of_le
#align le_of_le_of_eq' le_of_le_of_eq'
theorem le_of_eq_of_le' : b = c → a ≤ b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_of_le_of_eq
#align le_of_eq_of_le' le_of_eq_of_le'
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq' : b < c → a = b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_eq_of_lt
#align lt_of_lt_of_eq' lt_of_lt_of_eq'
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt' : b = c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_lt_of_eq
#align lt_of_eq_of_lt' lt_of_eq_of_lt'
alias LE.le.trans_eq := le_of_le_of_eq
alias LE.le.trans_eq' := le_of_le_of_eq'
alias LT.lt.trans_eq := lt_of_lt_of_eq
alias LT.lt.trans_eq' := lt_of_lt_of_eq'
alias Eq.trans_le := le_of_eq_of_le
#align eq.trans_le Eq.trans_le
alias Eq.trans_ge := le_of_eq_of_le'
#align eq.trans_ge Eq.trans_ge
alias Eq.trans_lt := lt_of_eq_of_lt
#align eq.trans_lt Eq.trans_lt
alias Eq.trans_gt := lt_of_eq_of_lt'
#align eq.trans_gt Eq.trans_gt
end
namespace Eq
variable [Preorder α] {x y z : α}
/-- If `x = y` then `y ≤ x`. Note: this lemma uses `y ≤ x` instead of `x ≥ y`, because `le` is used
almost exclusively in mathlib. -/
protected theorem ge (h : x = y) : y ≤ x :=
h.symm.le
#align eq.ge Eq.ge
theorem not_lt (h : x = y) : ¬x < y := fun h' ↦ h'.ne h
#align eq.not_lt Eq.not_lt
theorem not_gt (h : x = y) : ¬y < x :=
h.symm.not_lt
#align eq.not_gt Eq.not_gt
end Eq
section
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
@[simp] lemma le_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : a ≤ b := (Subsingleton.elim a b).le
-- Making this a @[simp] lemma causes confluences problems downstream.
lemma not_lt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : ¬a < b := (Subsingleton.elim a b).not_lt
end
namespace LE.le
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- Porting note: linter not found @[nolint ge_or_gt]
protected theorem ge [LE α] {x y : α} (h : x ≤ y) : y ≥ x :=
h
#align has_le.le.ge LE.le.ge
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem lt_iff_ne (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ↔ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.ne, h.lt_of_ne⟩
#align has_le.le.lt_iff_ne LE.le.lt_iff_ne
theorem gt_iff_ne (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ↔ b ≠ a :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.ne.symm, h.lt_of_ne'⟩
#align has_le.le.gt_iff_ne LE.le.gt_iff_ne
theorem not_lt_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a < b ↔ a = b :=
h.lt_iff_ne.not_left
#align has_le.le.not_lt_iff_eq LE.le.not_lt_iff_eq
theorem not_gt_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a < b ↔ b = a :=
h.gt_iff_ne.not_left
#align has_le.le.not_gt_iff_eq LE.le.not_gt_iff_eq
theorem le_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : b ≤ a ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.antisymm h, Eq.le⟩
#align has_le.le.le_iff_eq LE.le.le_iff_eq
theorem ge_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : b ≤ a ↔ a = b :=
⟨h.antisymm, Eq.ge⟩
#align has_le.le.ge_iff_eq LE.le.ge_iff_eq
end PartialOrder
theorem lt_or_le [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a < c ∨ c ≤ b :=
((lt_or_ge a c).imp id) fun hc ↦ le_trans hc h
#align has_le.le.lt_or_le LE.le.lt_or_le
theorem le_or_lt [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a ≤ c ∨ c < b :=
((le_or_gt a c).imp id) fun hc ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hc h
#align has_le.le.le_or_lt LE.le.le_or_lt
theorem le_or_le [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b :=
(h.le_or_lt c).elim Or.inl fun h ↦ Or.inr <| le_of_lt h
#align has_le.le.le_or_le LE.le.le_or_le
end LE.le
namespace LT.lt
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- Porting note: linter not found @[nolint ge_or_gt]
protected theorem gt [LT α] {x y : α} (h : x < y) : y > x :=
h
#align has_lt.lt.gt LT.lt.gt
protected theorem false [Preorder α] {x : α} : x < x → False :=
lt_irrefl x
#align has_lt.lt.false LT.lt.false
theorem ne' [Preorder α] {x y : α} (h : x < y) : y ≠ x :=
h.ne.symm
#align has_lt.lt.ne' LT.lt.ne'
theorem lt_or_lt [LinearOrder α] {x y : α} (h : x < y) (z : α) : x < z ∨ z < y :=
(lt_or_ge z y).elim Or.inr fun hz ↦ Or.inl <| h.trans_le hz
#align has_lt.lt.lt_or_lt LT.lt.lt_or_lt
end LT.lt
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- Porting note: linter not found @[nolint ge_or_gt]
protected theorem GE.ge.le [LE α] {x y : α} (h : x ≥ y) : y ≤ x :=
h
#align ge.le GE.ge.le
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- Porting note: linter not found @[nolint ge_or_gt]
protected theorem GT.gt.lt [LT α] {x y : α} (h : x > y) : y < x :=
h
#align gt.lt GT.gt.lt
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- Porting note: linter not found @[nolint ge_or_gt]
theorem ge_of_eq [Preorder α] {a b : α} (h : a = b) : a ≥ b :=
h.ge
#align ge_of_eq ge_of_eq
#align ge_iff_le ge_iff_le
#align gt_iff_lt gt_iff_lt
theorem not_le_of_lt [Preorder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ¬b ≤ a :=
(le_not_le_of_lt h).right
#align not_le_of_lt not_le_of_lt
alias LT.lt.not_le := not_le_of_lt
theorem not_lt_of_le [Preorder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : ¬b < a := fun hba ↦ hba.not_le h
#align not_lt_of_le not_lt_of_le
alias LE.le.not_lt := not_lt_of_le
theorem ne_of_not_le [Preorder α] {a b : α} (h : ¬a ≤ b) : a ≠ b := fun hab ↦ h (le_of_eq hab)
#align ne_of_not_le ne_of_not_le
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.le_iff_eq_or_lt [PartialOrder α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {a b : α} :
a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
Decidable.le_iff_lt_or_eq.trans or_comm
#align decidable.le_iff_eq_or_lt Decidable.le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem le_iff_eq_or_lt [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
le_iff_lt_or_eq.trans or_comm
#align le_iff_eq_or_lt le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} : a < b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨le_of_lt h, ne_of_lt h⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ h1.lt_of_ne h2⟩
#align lt_iff_le_and_ne lt_iff_le_and_ne
theorem eq_iff_not_lt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {x y : α} : x ≤ y → y = x ↔ ¬x < y := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, not_and, Classical.not_not, eq_comm]
#align eq_iff_not_lt_of_le eq_iff_not_lt_of_le
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.eq_iff_le_not_lt [PartialOrder α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {a b : α} :
a = b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ¬a < b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, h ▸ lt_irrefl _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦
h₁.antisymm <| Decidable.by_contradiction fun h₃ ↦ h₂ (h₁.lt_of_not_le h₃)⟩
#align decidable.eq_iff_le_not_lt Decidable.eq_iff_le_not_lt
theorem eq_iff_le_not_lt [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} : a = b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ¬a < b :=
haveI := Classical.dec
Decidable.eq_iff_le_not_lt
#align eq_iff_le_not_lt eq_iff_le_not_lt
theorem eq_or_lt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a = b ∨ a < b :=
h.lt_or_eq.symm
#align eq_or_lt_of_le eq_or_lt_of_le
theorem eq_or_gt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : b = a ∨ a < b :=
h.lt_or_eq.symm.imp Eq.symm id
#align eq_or_gt_of_le eq_or_gt_of_le
theorem gt_or_eq_of_le [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ∨ b = a :=
(eq_or_gt_of_le h).symm
#align gt_or_eq_of_le gt_or_eq_of_le
alias LE.le.eq_or_lt_dec := Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le
alias LE.le.eq_or_lt := eq_or_lt_of_le
alias LE.le.eq_or_gt := eq_or_gt_of_le
alias LE.le.gt_or_eq := gt_or_eq_of_le
-- Porting note: no `decidable_classical` linter
-- attribute [nolint decidable_classical] LE.le.eq_or_lt_dec
theorem eq_of_le_of_not_lt [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : ¬a < b) : a = b :=
hab.eq_or_lt.resolve_right hba
#align eq_of_le_of_not_lt eq_of_le_of_not_lt
theorem eq_of_ge_of_not_gt [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : ¬a < b) : b = a :=
(hab.eq_or_lt.resolve_right hba).symm
#align eq_of_ge_of_not_gt eq_of_ge_of_not_gt
alias LE.le.eq_of_not_lt := eq_of_le_of_not_lt
alias LE.le.eq_of_not_gt := eq_of_ge_of_not_gt
theorem Ne.le_iff_lt [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h' ↦ lt_of_le_of_ne h' h, fun h ↦ h.le⟩
#align ne.le_iff_lt Ne.le_iff_lt
theorem Ne.not_le_or_not_le [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : ¬a ≤ b ∨ ¬b ≤ a :=
not_and_or.1 <| le_antisymm_iff.not.1 h
#align ne.not_le_or_not_le Ne.not_le_or_not_le
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.ne_iff_lt_iff_le [PartialOrder α] [DecidableEq α] {a b : α} :
(a ≠ b ↔ a < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ Decidable.byCases le_of_eq (le_of_lt ∘ h.mp), fun h ↦ ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne h, ne_of_lt⟩⟩
#align decidable.ne_iff_lt_iff_le Decidable.ne_iff_lt_iff_le
@[simp]
theorem ne_iff_lt_iff_le [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} : (a ≠ b ↔ a < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
haveI := Classical.dec
Decidable.ne_iff_lt_iff_le
#align ne_iff_lt_iff_le ne_iff_lt_iff_le
-- Variant of `min_def` with the branches reversed.
theorem min_def' [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) : min a b = if b ≤ a then b else a := by
rw [min_def]
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (lt | eq | gt)
· rw [if_pos lt.le, if_neg (not_le.mpr lt)]
· rw [if_pos eq.le, if_pos eq.ge, eq]
· rw [if_neg (not_le.mpr gt.gt), if_pos gt.le]
#align min_def' min_def'
-- Variant of `min_def` with the branches reversed.
-- This is sometimes useful as it used to be the default.
theorem max_def' [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) : max a b = if b ≤ a then a else b := by
rw [max_def]
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (lt | eq | gt)
· rw [if_pos lt.le, if_neg (not_le.mpr lt)]
· rw [if_pos eq.le, if_pos eq.ge, eq]
· rw [if_neg (not_le.mpr gt.gt), if_pos gt.le]
#align max_def' max_def'
theorem lt_of_not_le [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} (h : ¬b ≤ a) : a < b :=
((le_total _ _).resolve_right h).lt_of_not_le h
#align lt_of_not_le lt_of_not_le
theorem lt_iff_not_le [LinearOrder α] {x y : α} : x < y ↔ ¬y ≤ x :=
⟨not_le_of_lt, lt_of_not_le⟩
#align lt_iff_not_le lt_iff_not_le
theorem Ne.lt_or_lt [LinearOrder α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : x < y ∨ y < x :=
lt_or_gt_of_ne h
#align ne.lt_or_lt Ne.lt_or_lt
/-- A version of `ne_iff_lt_or_gt` with LHS and RHS reversed. -/
@[simp]
theorem lt_or_lt_iff_ne [LinearOrder α] {x y : α} : x < y ∨ y < x ↔ x ≠ y :=
ne_iff_lt_or_gt.symm
#align lt_or_lt_iff_ne lt_or_lt_iff_ne
theorem not_lt_iff_eq_or_lt [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} : ¬a < b ↔ a = b ∨ b < a :=
not_lt.trans <| Decidable.le_iff_eq_or_lt.trans <| or_congr eq_comm Iff.rfl
#align not_lt_iff_eq_or_lt not_lt_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem exists_ge_of_linear [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) : ∃ c, a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
match le_total a b with
| Or.inl h => ⟨_, h, le_rfl⟩
| Or.inr h => ⟨_, le_rfl, h⟩
#align exists_ge_of_linear exists_ge_of_linear
lemma exists_forall_ge_and [LinearOrder α] {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, p j) → (∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, q j) → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, p j ∧ q j
| ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨c, hac, hbc⟩ := exists_ge_of_linear a b
⟨c, fun _d hcd ↦ ⟨ha _ $ hac.trans hcd, hb _ $ hbc.trans hcd⟩⟩
#align exists_forall_ge_and exists_forall_ge_and
theorem lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le {β} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b → c ≤ d) (h : d < c) : b < a :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' ↦ (H h').not_lt h
#align lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le
theorem le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β} :
a ≤ b → c ≤ d ↔ d < c → b < a :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le, le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt⟩
#align le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt
theorem lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' {β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) (H' : b ≤ a ↔ d ≤ c) : b < a ↔ d < c :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| (and_congr H' (not_congr H)).trans lt_iff_le_not_le.symm
#align lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le'
theorem lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) : b < a ↔ d < c :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr H).trans <| not_le
#align lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le
theorem le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β} :
(a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) ↔ (b < a ↔ d < c) :=
⟨lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le, fun H ↦ not_lt.symm.trans <| (not_congr H).trans <| not_lt⟩
#align le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt
theorem eq_of_forall_le_iff [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (H : ∀ c, c ≤ a ↔ c ≤ b) : a = b :=
((H _).1 le_rfl).antisymm ((H _).2 le_rfl)
#align eq_of_forall_le_iff eq_of_forall_le_iff
theorem le_of_forall_le [Preorder α] {a b : α} (H : ∀ c, c ≤ a → c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
H _ le_rfl
#align le_of_forall_le le_of_forall_le
theorem le_of_forall_le' [Preorder α] {a b : α} (H : ∀ c, a ≤ c → b ≤ c) : b ≤ a :=
H _ le_rfl
#align le_of_forall_le' le_of_forall_le'
theorem le_of_forall_lt [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} (H : ∀ c, c < a → c < b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl _ (H _ h)
#align le_of_forall_lt le_of_forall_lt
theorem forall_lt_iff_le [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} : (∀ ⦃c⦄, c < a → c < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨le_of_forall_lt, fun h _ hca ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hca h⟩
#align forall_lt_iff_le forall_lt_iff_le
theorem le_of_forall_lt' [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} (H : ∀ c, a < c → b < c) : b ≤ a :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl _ (H _ h)
#align le_of_forall_lt' le_of_forall_lt'
theorem forall_lt_iff_le' [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} : (∀ ⦃c⦄, a < c → b < c) ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_forall_lt', fun h _ hac ↦ lt_of_le_of_lt h hac⟩
#align forall_lt_iff_le' forall_lt_iff_le'
theorem eq_of_forall_ge_iff [PartialOrder α] {a b : α} (H : ∀ c, a ≤ c ↔ b ≤ c) : a = b :=
((H _).2 le_rfl).antisymm ((H _).1 le_rfl)
#align eq_of_forall_ge_iff eq_of_forall_ge_iff
theorem eq_of_forall_lt_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} (h : ∀ c, c < a ↔ c < b) : a = b :=
(le_of_forall_lt fun _ ↦ (h _).1).antisymm <| le_of_forall_lt fun _ ↦ (h _).2
#align eq_of_forall_lt_iff eq_of_forall_lt_iff
theorem eq_of_forall_gt_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} (h : ∀ c, a < c ↔ b < c) : a = b :=
(le_of_forall_lt' fun _ ↦ (h _).2).antisymm <| le_of_forall_lt' fun _ ↦ (h _).1
#align eq_of_forall_gt_iff eq_of_forall_gt_iff
/-- A symmetric relation implies two values are equal, when it implies they're less-equal. -/
theorem rel_imp_eq_of_rel_imp_le [PartialOrder β] (r : α → α → Prop) [IsSymm α r] {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ a b, r a b → f a ≤ f b) {a b : α} : r a b → f a = f b := fun hab ↦
le_antisymm (h a b hab) (h b a <| symm hab)
#align rel_imp_eq_of_rel_imp_le rel_imp_eq_of_rel_imp_le
/-- monotonicity of `≤` with respect to `→` -/
theorem le_implies_le_of_le_of_le {a b c d : α} [Preorder α] (hca : c ≤ a) (hbd : b ≤ d) :
a ≤ b → c ≤ d :=
fun hab ↦ (hca.trans hab).trans hbd
#align le_implies_le_of_le_of_le le_implies_le_of_le_of_le
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
/-- To prove commutativity of a binary operation `○`, we only to check `a ○ b ≤ b ○ a` for all `a`,
`b`. -/
theorem commutative_of_le {f : β → β → α} (comm : ∀ a b, f a b ≤ f b a) : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a :=
fun _ _ ↦ (comm _ _).antisymm <| comm _ _
#align commutative_of_le commutative_of_le
/-- To prove associativity of a commutative binary operation `○`, we only to check
`(a ○ b) ○ c ≤ a ○ (b ○ c)` for all `a`, `b`, `c`. -/
theorem associative_of_commutative_of_le {f : α → α → α} (comm : Commutative f)
(assoc : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c ≤ f a (f b c)) : Associative f := fun a b c ↦
le_antisymm (assoc _ _ _) <| by
rw [comm, comm b, comm _ c, comm a]
exact assoc _ _ _
#align associative_of_commutative_of_le associative_of_commutative_of_le
end PartialOrder
@[ext]
| Mathlib/Order/Basic.lean | 589 | 599 | theorem Preorder.toLE_injective : Function.Injective (@Preorder.toLE α) :=
fun A B h ↦ match A, B with
| { lt := A_lt, lt_iff_le_not_le := A_iff, .. },
{ lt := B_lt, lt_iff_le_not_le := B_iff, .. } => by
cases h
have : A_lt = B_lt := by |
funext a b
show (LT.mk A_lt).lt a b = (LT.mk B_lt).lt a b
rw [A_iff, B_iff]
cases this
congr
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.nat.bitwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6afc9b06856ad973f6a2619e3e8a0a8d537a58f2"
/-!
# Bitwise operations on natural numbers
In the first half of this file, we provide theorems for reasoning about natural numbers from their
bitwise properties. In the second half of this file, we show properties of the bitwise operations
`lor`, `land` and `xor`, which are defined in core.
## Main results
* `eq_of_testBit_eq`: two natural numbers are equal if they have equal bits at every position.
* `exists_most_significant_bit`: if `n ≠ 0`, then there is some position `i` that contains the most
significant `1`-bit of `n`.
* `lt_of_testBit`: if `n` and `m` are numbers and `i` is a position such that the `i`-th bit of
of `n` is zero, the `i`-th bit of `m` is one, and all more significant bits are equal, then
`n < m`.
## Future work
There is another way to express bitwise properties of natural number: `digits 2`. The two ways
should be connected.
## Keywords
bitwise, and, or, xor
-/
open Function
namespace Nat
set_option linter.deprecated false
section
variable {f : Bool → Bool → Bool}
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_zero_left (m : Nat) : bitwise f 0 m = if f false true then m else 0 := by
simp [bitwise]
#align nat.bitwise_zero_left Nat.bitwise_zero_left
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_zero_right (n : Nat) : bitwise f n 0 = if f true false then n else 0 := by
unfold bitwise
simp only [ite_self, decide_False, Nat.zero_div, ite_true, ite_eq_right_iff]
rintro ⟨⟩
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align nat.bitwise_zero_right Nat.bitwise_zero_right
lemma bitwise_zero : bitwise f 0 0 = 0 := by
simp only [bitwise_zero_right, ite_self]
#align nat.bitwise_zero Nat.bitwise_zero
lemma bitwise_of_ne_zero {n m : Nat} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
bitwise f n m = bit (f (bodd n) (bodd m)) (bitwise f (n / 2) (m / 2)) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
have mod_two_iff_bod x : (x % 2 = 1 : Bool) = bodd x := by
simp only [mod_two_of_bodd, cond]; cases bodd x <;> rfl
simp only [hn, hm, mod_two_iff_bod, ite_false, bit, bit1, bit0, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem binaryRec_of_ne_zero {C : Nat → Sort*} (z : C 0) (f : ∀ b n, C n → C (bit b n)) {n}
(h : n ≠ 0) :
binaryRec z f n = bit_decomp n ▸ f (bodd n) (div2 n) (binaryRec z f (div2 n)) := by
rw [Eq.rec_eq_cast]
rw [binaryRec]
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg h, eq_mpr_eq_cast]
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_bit {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (h : f false false = false := by rfl) (a m b n) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was
-- simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [bit, bit1, bit0, Bool.cond_eq_ite] -/
simp only [bit, ite_apply, bit1, bit0, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
have h1 x : (x + x) % 2 = 0 := by rw [← two_mul, mul_comm]; apply mul_mod_left
have h2 x : (x + x + 1) % 2 = 1 := by rw [← two_mul, add_comm]; apply add_mul_mod_self_left
have h3 x : (x + x) / 2 = x := by omega
have h4 x : (x + x + 1) / 2 = x := by rw [← two_mul, add_comm]; simp [add_mul_div_left]
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp [h1, h2, h3, h4] <;> split_ifs
<;> simp_all (config := {decide := true})
#align nat.bitwise_bit Nat.bitwise_bit
lemma bit_mod_two (a : Bool) (x : ℕ) :
bit a x % 2 = if a then 1 else 0 := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was
-- simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [bit, bit1, bit0, ← mul_two,
-- Bool.cond_eq_ite] -/
simp only [bit, ite_apply, bit1, bit0, ← mul_two, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
split_ifs <;> simp [Nat.add_mod]
@[simp]
lemma bit_mod_two_eq_zero_iff (a x) :
bit a x % 2 = 0 ↔ !a := by
rw [bit_mod_two]; split_ifs <;> simp_all
@[simp]
lemma bit_mod_two_eq_one_iff (a x) :
bit a x % 2 = 1 ↔ a := by
rw [bit_mod_two]; split_ifs <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem lor_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m ||| bit b n = bit (a || b) (m ||| n) :=
bitwise_bit
#align nat.lor_bit Nat.lor_bit
@[simp]
theorem land_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m &&& bit b n = bit (a && b) (m &&& n) :=
bitwise_bit
#align nat.land_bit Nat.land_bit
@[simp]
theorem ldiff_bit : ∀ a m b n, ldiff (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && not b) (ldiff m n) :=
bitwise_bit
#align nat.ldiff_bit Nat.ldiff_bit
@[simp]
theorem xor_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m ^^^ bit b n = bit (bne a b) (m ^^^ n) :=
bitwise_bit
#align nat.lxor_bit Nat.xor_bit
attribute [simp] Nat.testBit_bitwise
#align nat.test_bit_bitwise Nat.testBit_bitwise
theorem testBit_lor : ∀ m n k, testBit (m ||| n) k = (testBit m k || testBit n k) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
#align nat.test_bit_lor Nat.testBit_lor
theorem testBit_land : ∀ m n k, testBit (m &&& n) k = (testBit m k && testBit n k) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
#align nat.test_bit_land Nat.testBit_land
@[simp]
theorem testBit_ldiff : ∀ m n k, testBit (ldiff m n) k = (testBit m k && not (testBit n k)) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
#align nat.test_bit_ldiff Nat.testBit_ldiff
attribute [simp] testBit_xor
#align nat.test_bit_lxor Nat.testBit_xor
end
@[simp]
theorem bit_false : bit false = bit0 :=
rfl
#align nat.bit_ff Nat.bit_false
@[simp]
theorem bit_true : bit true = bit1 :=
rfl
#align nat.bit_tt Nat.bit_true
@[simp]
theorem bit_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {b : Bool} : n.bit b = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∧ b = false := by
cases b <;> simp [Nat.bit0_eq_zero, Nat.bit1_ne_zero]
#align nat.bit_eq_zero Nat.bit_eq_zero
theorem bit_ne_zero_iff {n : ℕ} {b : Bool} : n.bit b ≠ 0 ↔ n = 0 → b = true := by
simpa only [not_and, Bool.not_eq_false] using (@bit_eq_zero n b).not
/-- An alternative for `bitwise_bit` which replaces the `f false false = false` assumption
with assumptions that neither `bit a m` nor `bit b n` are `0`
(albeit, phrased as the implications `m = 0 → a = true` and `n = 0 → b = true`) -/
lemma bitwise_bit' {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (a : Bool) (m : Nat) (b : Bool) (n : Nat)
(ham : m = 0 → a = true) (hbn : n = 0 → b = true) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at ham hbn
simp only [ham, hbn, bit_mod_two_eq_one_iff, Bool.decide_coe, ← div2_val, div2_bit, ne_eq,
ite_false]
conv_rhs => simp only [bit, bit1, bit0, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
split_ifs with hf <;> rfl
lemma bitwise_eq_binaryRec (f : Bool → Bool → Bool) :
bitwise f =
binaryRec (fun n => cond (f false true) n 0) fun a m Ia =>
binaryRec (cond (f true false) (bit a m) 0) fun b n _ => bit (f a b) (Ia n) := by
funext x y
induction x using binaryRec' generalizing y with
| z => simp only [bitwise_zero_left, binaryRec_zero, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
| f xb x hxb ih =>
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at hxb
simp_rw [binaryRec_of_ne_zero _ _ hxb, bodd_bit, div2_bit, eq_rec_constant]
induction y using binaryRec' with
| z => simp only [bitwise_zero_right, binaryRec_zero, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
| f yb y hyb =>
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at hyb
simp_rw [binaryRec_of_ne_zero _ _ hyb, bitwise_of_ne_zero hxb hyb, bodd_bit, ← div2_val,
div2_bit, eq_rec_constant, ih]
theorem zero_of_testBit_eq_false {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ i, testBit n i = false) : n = 0 := by
induction' n using Nat.binaryRec with b n hn
· rfl
· have : b = false := by simpa using h 0
rw [this, bit_false, bit0_val, hn fun i => by rw [← h (i + 1), testBit_bit_succ], mul_zero]
#align nat.zero_of_test_bit_eq_ff Nat.zero_of_testBit_eq_false
theorem testBit_eq_false_of_lt {n i} (h : n < 2 ^ i) : n.testBit i = false := by
simp [testBit, shiftRight_eq_div_pow, Nat.div_eq_of_lt h]
#align nat.zero_test_bit Nat.zero_testBit
/-- The ith bit is the ith element of `n.bits`. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Bitwise.lean | 218 | 225 | theorem testBit_eq_inth (n i : ℕ) : n.testBit i = n.bits.getI i := by |
induction' i with i ih generalizing n
· simp only [testBit, zero_eq, shiftRight_zero, one_and_eq_mod_two, mod_two_of_bodd,
bodd_eq_bits_head, List.getI_zero_eq_headI]
cases List.headI (bits n) <;> rfl
conv_lhs => rw [← bit_decomp n]
rw [testBit_bit_succ, ih n.div2, div2_bits_eq_tail]
cases n.bits <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.GeometryOfNumbers
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.VolumeOfBalls
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding.Basic
#align_import number_theory.number_field.canonical_embedding from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60da01b41bbe4206f05d34fd70c8dd7498717a30"
/-!
# Convex Bodies
The file contains the definitions of several convex bodies lying in the space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`
associated to a number field of signature `K` and proves several existence theorems by applying
*Minkowski Convex Body Theorem* to those.
## Main definitions and results
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.convexBodyLT`: The set of points `x` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all
infinite places `w` with `f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0`.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.convexBodySum`: The set of points `x` such that
`∑ w real, ‖x w‖ + 2 * ∑ w complex, ‖x w‖ ≤ B`
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt`: Let `I` be a fractional ideal of `K`.
Assume that `f` is such that `minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodyLT K f)`, then there exists a
nonzero algebraic number `a` in `I` such that `w a < f w` for all infinite places `w`.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le`: Let `I` be a fractional ideal
of `K`. Assume that `B` is such that `minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodySum K B)` (see
`convexBodySum_volume` for the computation of this volume), then there exists a nonzero algebraic
number `a` in `I` such that `|Norm a| < (B / d) ^ d` where `d` is the degree of `K`.
## Tags
number field, infinite places
-/
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace FiniteDimensional
/-- The space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂` with `(r₁, r₂)` the signature of `K`. -/
local notation "E" K =>
({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)
section convexBodyLT
open Metric NNReal
variable (f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0)
/-- The convex body defined by `f`: the set of points `x : E` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all
infinite places `w`. -/
abbrev convexBodyLT : Set (E K) :=
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } => ball 0 (f w))) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } => ball 0 (f w)))
theorem convexBodyLT_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f) ↔ ∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x < f w := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, mem_ball_zero_iff, Pi.ringHom_apply, ← Complex.norm_real,
embedding_of_isReal_apply, Subtype.forall, ← forall₂_or_left, ← not_isReal_iff_isComplex, em,
forall_true_left, norm_embedding_eq]
theorem convexBodyLT_neg_mem (x : E K) (hx : x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f)) :
-x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f) := by
simp only [Set.mem_prod, Prod.fst_neg, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ, Pi.neg_apply,
mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_neg, Real.norm_eq_abs, forall_true_left, Subtype.forall,
Prod.snd_neg, Complex.norm_eq_abs] at hx ⊢
exact hx
theorem convexBodyLT_convex : Convex ℝ (convexBodyLT K f) :=
Convex.prod (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _)) (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _))
open Fintype MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure ENNReal
open scoped Classical
variable [NumberField K]
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (E K)) := prod.instIsAddHaarMeasure volume volume
instance : NoAtoms (volume : Measure (E K)) := by
obtain ⟨w⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (InfinitePlace K))
by_cases hw : IsReal w
· exact @prod.instNoAtoms_fst _ _ _ _ volume volume _ (pi_noAtoms ⟨w, hw⟩)
· exact @prod.instNoAtoms_snd _ _ _ _ volume volume _
(pi_noAtoms ⟨w, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw⟩)
/-- The fudge factor that appears in the formula for the volume of `convexBodyLT`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodyLTFactor : ℝ≥0 :=
(2 : ℝ≥0) ^ NrRealPlaces K * NNReal.pi ^ NrComplexPlaces K
theorem convexBodyLTFactor_ne_zero : convexBodyLTFactor K ≠ 0 :=
mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero) (pow_ne_zero _ pi_ne_zero)
theorem one_le_convexBodyLTFactor : 1 ≤ convexBodyLTFactor K :=
one_le_mul₀ (one_le_pow_of_one_le one_le_two _)
(one_le_pow_of_one_le (le_trans one_le_two Real.two_le_pi) _)
/-- The volume of `(ConvexBodyLt K f)` where `convexBodyLT K f` is the set of points `x`
such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all infinite places `w`. -/
theorem convexBodyLT_volume :
volume (convexBodyLT K f) = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
calc
_ = (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (2 * (f x.val))) *
∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2 * NNReal.pi := by
simp_rw [volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, volume_pi, pi_pi, Real.volume_ball, Complex.volume_ball]
_ = ((2:ℝ≥0) ^ NrRealPlaces K * (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val)))
* ((∏ x : {w // IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2) *
NNReal.pi ^ NrComplexPlaces K) := by
simp_rw [ofReal_mul (by norm_num : 0 ≤ (2 : ℝ)), Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const,
Finset.card_univ, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_ofNat]
_ = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ((∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, .ofReal (f x.val)) *
(∏ x : {w // IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2)) := by
simp_rw [convexBodyLTFactor, coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_pow]
ring
_ = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
simp_rw [mult, pow_ite, pow_one, Finset.prod_ite, ofReal_coe_nnreal, not_isReal_iff_isComplex,
coe_mul, coe_finset_prod, ENNReal.coe_pow]
congr 2
· refine (Finset.prod_subtype (Finset.univ.filter _) ?_ (fun w => (f w : ℝ≥0∞))).symm
exact fun _ => by simp only [Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, true_and]
· refine (Finset.prod_subtype (Finset.univ.filter _) ?_ (fun w => (f w : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2)).symm
exact fun _ => by simp only [Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, true_and]
variable {f}
/-- This is a technical result: quite often, we want to impose conditions at all infinite places
but one and choose the value at the remaining place so that we can apply
`exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_lt`. -/
theorem adjust_f {w₁ : InfinitePlace K} (B : ℝ≥0) (hf : ∀ w, w ≠ w₁ → f w ≠ 0) :
∃ g : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0, (∀ w, w ≠ w₁ → g w = f w) ∧ ∏ w, (g w) ^ mult w = B := by
let S := ∏ w ∈ Finset.univ.erase w₁, (f w) ^ mult w
refine ⟨Function.update f w₁ ((B * S⁻¹) ^ (mult w₁ : ℝ)⁻¹), ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun w hw => Function.update_noteq hw _ f
· rw [← Finset.mul_prod_erase Finset.univ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₁), Function.update_same,
Finset.prod_congr rfl fun w hw => by rw [Function.update_noteq (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hw)],
← NNReal.rpow_natCast, ← NNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel, NNReal.rpow_one, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel, mul_one]
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
exact fun w hw => pow_ne_zero _ (hf w (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hw))
· rw [mult]; split_ifs <;> norm_num
end convexBodyLT
section convexBodyLT'
open Metric ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Classical
variable (f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0) (w₀ : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w})
/-- A version of `convexBodyLT` with an additional condition at a fixed complex place. This is
needed to ensure the element constructed is not real, see for example
`exists_primitive_element_lt_of_isComplex`.
-/
abbrev convexBodyLT' : Set (E K) :=
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } ↦ ball 0 (f w))) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } ↦
if w = w₀ then {x | |x.re| < 1 ∧ |x.im| < (f w : ℝ) ^ 2} else ball 0 (f w)))
theorem convexBodyLT'_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀ ↔
(∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w ≠ w₀ → w x < f w) ∧
|(w₀.val.embedding x).re| < 1 ∧ |(w₀.val.embedding x).im| < (f w₀: ℝ) ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, Pi.ringHom_apply, apply_ite, mem_ball_zero_iff, ← Complex.norm_real,
embedding_of_isReal_apply, norm_embedding_eq, Subtype.forall, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨fun w h_ne ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨fun w hw ↦ ?_, fun w hw ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· by_cases hw : IsReal w
· exact norm_embedding_eq w _ ▸ h₁ w hw
· specialize h₂ w (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw)
rwa [if_neg (by exact Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 h_ne)] at h₂
· simpa [if_true] using h₂ w₀.val w₀.prop
· exact h₁ w (ne_of_isReal_isComplex hw w₀.prop)
· by_cases h_ne : w = w₀
· simpa [h_ne]
· rw [if_neg (by exact Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 h_ne)]
exact h₁ w h_ne
theorem convexBodyLT'_neg_mem (x : E K) (hx : x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀) :
-x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀ := by
simp [Set.mem_prod, Prod.fst_neg, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ, Pi.neg_apply,
mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_neg, Real.norm_eq_abs, forall_true_left, Subtype.forall,
Prod.snd_neg, Complex.norm_eq_abs] at hx ⊢
convert hx using 3
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem convexBodyLT'_convex : Convex ℝ (convexBodyLT' K f w₀) := by
refine Convex.prod (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _)) (convex_pi (fun _ _ => ?_))
split_ifs
· simp_rw [abs_lt]
refine Convex.inter ((convex_halfspace_re_gt _).inter (convex_halfspace_re_lt _))
((convex_halfspace_im_gt _).inter (convex_halfspace_im_lt _))
· exact convex_ball _ _
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Classical
variable [NumberField K]
/-- The fudge factor that appears in the formula for the volume of `convexBodyLT'`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodyLT'Factor : ℝ≥0 :=
(2 : ℝ≥0) ^ (NrRealPlaces K + 2) * NNReal.pi ^ (NrComplexPlaces K - 1)
theorem convexBodyLT'Factor_ne_zero : convexBodyLT'Factor K ≠ 0 :=
mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero) (pow_ne_zero _ pi_ne_zero)
theorem one_le_convexBodyLT'Factor : 1 ≤ convexBodyLT'Factor K :=
one_le_mul₀ (one_le_pow_of_one_le one_le_two _)
(one_le_pow_of_one_le (le_trans one_le_two Real.two_le_pi) _)
theorem convexBodyLT'_volume :
volume (convexBodyLT' K f w₀) = convexBodyLT'Factor K * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
have vol_box : ∀ B : ℝ≥0, volume {x : ℂ | |x.re| < 1 ∧ |x.im| < B^2} = 4*B^2 := by
intro B
rw [← (Complex.volume_preserving_equiv_real_prod.symm).measure_preimage]
· simp_rw [Set.preimage_setOf_eq, Complex.measurableEquivRealProd_symm_apply]
rw [show {a : ℝ × ℝ | |a.1| < 1 ∧ |a.2| < B ^ 2} =
Set.Ioo (-1:ℝ) (1:ℝ) ×ˢ Set.Ioo (- (B:ℝ) ^ 2) ((B:ℝ) ^ 2) by
ext; simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_Ioo, abs_lt]]
simp_rw [volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, Real.volume_Ioo, sub_neg_eq_add, one_add_one_eq_two,
← two_mul, ofReal_mul zero_le_two, ofReal_pow (coe_nonneg B), ofReal_ofNat,
ofReal_coe_nnreal, ← mul_assoc, show (2:ℝ≥0∞) * 2 = 4 by norm_num]
· refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· exact measurableSet_lt (measurable_norm.comp Complex.measurable_re) measurable_const
· exact measurableSet_lt (measurable_norm.comp Complex.measurable_im) measurable_const
calc
_ = (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (2 * (f x.val))) *
((∏ x ∈ Finset.univ.erase w₀, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2 * pi) *
(4 * (f w₀) ^ 2)) := by
simp_rw [volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, volume_pi, pi_pi, Real.volume_ball]
rw [← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₀)]
congr 2
· refine Finset.prod_congr rfl (fun w' hw' ↦ ?_)
rw [if_neg (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hw'), Complex.volume_ball]
· simpa only [ite_true] using vol_box (f w₀)
_ = ((2 : ℝ≥0) ^ NrRealPlaces K *
(∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val))) *
((∏ x ∈ Finset.univ.erase w₀, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2) *
↑pi ^ (NrComplexPlaces K - 1) * (4 * (f w₀) ^ 2)) := by
simp_rw [ofReal_mul (by norm_num : 0 ≤ (2 : ℝ)), Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const,
Finset.card_erase_of_mem (Finset.mem_univ _), Finset.card_univ, ofReal_ofNat,
ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_ofNat]
_ = convexBodyLT'Factor K * (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val))
* (∏ x : {w // IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2) := by
rw [show (4 : ℝ≥0∞) = (2 : ℝ≥0) ^ 2 by norm_num, convexBodyLT'Factor, pow_add,
← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₀), ofReal_coe_nnreal]
simp_rw [coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_pow]
ring
_ = convexBodyLT'Factor K * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
simp_rw [mult, pow_ite, pow_one, Finset.prod_ite, ofReal_coe_nnreal, not_isReal_iff_isComplex,
coe_mul, coe_finset_prod, ENNReal.coe_pow, mul_assoc]
congr 3
· refine (Finset.prod_subtype (Finset.univ.filter _) ?_ (fun w => (f w : ℝ≥0∞))).symm
exact fun _ => by simp only [Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, true_and]
· refine (Finset.prod_subtype (Finset.univ.filter _) ?_ (fun w => (f w : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2)).symm
exact fun _ => by simp only [Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, true_and]
end convexBodyLT'
section convexBodySum
open ENNReal MeasureTheory Fintype
open scoped Real Classical NNReal
variable [NumberField K] (B : ℝ)
variable {K}
/-- The function that sends `x : ({w // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({w // IsComplex w} → ℂ)` to
`∑ w, ‖x.1 w‖ + 2 * ∑ w, ‖x.2 w‖`. It defines a norm and it used to define `convexBodySum`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodySumFun (x : E K) : ℝ := ∑ w, mult w * normAtPlace w x
theorem convexBodySumFun_apply (x : E K) :
convexBodySumFun x = ∑ w, mult w * normAtPlace w x := rfl
theorem convexBodySumFun_apply' (x : E K) :
convexBodySumFun x = ∑ w, ‖x.1 w‖ + 2 * ∑ w, ‖x.2 w‖ := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun_apply, ← Finset.sum_add_sum_compl {w | IsReal w}.toFinset,
Set.toFinset_setOf, Finset.compl_filter, not_isReal_iff_isComplex, ← Finset.subtype_univ,
← Finset.univ.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter, Finset.mul_sum]
congr
· ext w
rw [mult, if_pos w.prop, normAtPlace_apply_isReal, Nat.cast_one, one_mul]
· ext w
rw [mult, if_neg (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr w.prop), normAtPlace_apply_isComplex,
Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem convexBodySumFun_nonneg (x : E K) :
0 ≤ convexBodySumFun x :=
Finset.sum_nonneg (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_pos.mpr mult_pos).le (normAtPlace_nonneg _ _))
theorem convexBodySumFun_neg (x : E K) :
convexBodySumFun (- x) = convexBodySumFun x := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun, normAtPlace_neg]
theorem convexBodySumFun_add_le (x y : E K) :
convexBodySumFun (x + y) ≤ convexBodySumFun x + convexBodySumFun y := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← mul_add]
exact Finset.sum_le_sum
fun _ _ ↦ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (normAtPlace_add_le _ x y) (Nat.cast_pos.mpr mult_pos).le
theorem convexBodySumFun_smul (c : ℝ) (x : E K) :
convexBodySumFun (c • x) = |c| * convexBodySumFun x := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun, normAtPlace_smul, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm, Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc]
theorem convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff (x : E K) :
convexBodySumFun x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← normAtPlace_eq_zero, convexBodySumFun, Finset.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg fun _ _ =>
mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_pos.mpr mult_pos).le (normAtPlace_nonneg _ _)]
conv =>
enter [1, w, hw]
rw [mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr mult_ne_zero)]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_univ, true_implies]
theorem norm_le_convexBodySumFun (x : E K) : ‖x‖ ≤ convexBodySumFun x := by
rw [norm_eq_sup'_normAtPlace]
refine (Finset.sup'_le_iff _ _).mpr fun w _ ↦ ?_
rw [convexBodySumFun_apply, ← Finset.univ.add_sum_erase _ (Finset.mem_univ w)]
refine le_add_of_le_of_nonneg ?_ ?_
· exact le_mul_of_one_le_left (normAtPlace_nonneg w x) one_le_mult
· exact Finset.sum_nonneg (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_pos.mpr mult_pos).le
(normAtPlace_nonneg _ _))
variable (K)
theorem convexBodySumFun_continuous :
Continuous (convexBodySumFun : (E K) → ℝ) := by
refine continuous_finset_sum Finset.univ fun w ↦ ?_
obtain hw | hw := isReal_or_isComplex w
all_goals
· simp only [normAtPlace_apply_isReal, normAtPlace_apply_isComplex, hw]
fun_prop
/-- The convex body equal to the set of points `x : E` such that
`∑ w real, ‖x w‖ + 2 * ∑ w complex, ‖x w‖ ≤ B`. -/
abbrev convexBodySum : Set (E K) := { x | convexBodySumFun x ≤ B }
theorem convexBodySum_volume_eq_zero_of_le_zero {B} (hB : B ≤ 0) :
volume (convexBodySum K B) = 0 := by
obtain hB | hB := lt_or_eq_of_le hB
· suffices convexBodySum K B = ∅ by rw [this, measure_empty]
ext x
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun h => h.elim⟩
rw [Set.mem_setOf] at hx
linarith [convexBodySumFun_nonneg x]
· suffices convexBodySum K B = { 0 } by rw [this, measure_singleton]
ext
rw [convexBodySum, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_singleton_iff, hB, ← convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff]
exact (convexBodySumFun_nonneg _).le_iff_eq
theorem convexBodySum_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ (convexBodySum K B) ↔
∑ w : InfinitePlace K, (mult w) * w.val x ≤ B := by
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, convexBodySumFun, normAtPlace_apply]
rfl
theorem convexBodySum_neg_mem {x : E K} (hx : x ∈ (convexBodySum K B)) :
-x ∈ (convexBodySum K B) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf, convexBodySumFun_neg]
exact hx
theorem convexBodySum_convex : Convex ℝ (convexBodySum K B) := by
refine Convex_subadditive_le (fun _ _ => convexBodySumFun_add_le _ _) (fun c x h => ?_) B
convert le_of_eq (convexBodySumFun_smul c x)
exact (abs_eq_self.mpr h).symm
theorem convexBodySum_isBounded : Bornology.IsBounded (convexBodySum K B) := by
refine Metric.isBounded_iff.mpr ⟨B + B, fun x hx y hy => ?_⟩
refine le_trans (norm_sub_le x y) (add_le_add ?_ ?_)
· exact le_trans (norm_le_convexBodySumFun x) hx
· exact le_trans (norm_le_convexBodySumFun y) hy
theorem convexBodySum_compact : IsCompact (convexBodySum K B) := by
rw [Metric.isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded]
refine ⟨?_, convexBodySum_isBounded K B⟩
convert IsClosed.preimage (convexBodySumFun_continuous K) (isClosed_Icc : IsClosed (Set.Icc 0 B))
ext
simp [convexBodySumFun_nonneg]
/-- The fudge factor that appears in the formula for the volume of `convexBodyLt`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodySumFactor : ℝ≥0 :=
(2 : ℝ≥0) ^ NrRealPlaces K * (NNReal.pi / 2) ^ NrComplexPlaces K / (finrank ℚ K).factorial
theorem convexBodySumFactor_ne_zero : convexBodySumFactor K ≠ 0 := by
refine div_ne_zero ?_ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.factorial_ne_zero _)
exact mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero)
(pow_ne_zero _ (div_ne_zero NNReal.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero))
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Real in
theorem convexBodySum_volume :
volume (convexBodySum K B) = (convexBodySumFactor K) * (.ofReal B) ^ (finrank ℚ K) := by
obtain hB | hB := le_or_lt B 0
· rw [convexBodySum_volume_eq_zero_of_le_zero K hB, ofReal_eq_zero.mpr hB, zero_pow, mul_zero]
exact finrank_pos.ne'
· suffices volume (convexBodySum K 1) = (convexBodySumFactor K) by
rw [mul_comm]
convert addHaar_smul volume B (convexBodySum K 1)
· simp_rw [← Set.preimage_smul_inv₀ (ne_of_gt hB), Set.preimage_setOf_eq, convexBodySumFun,
normAtPlace_smul, abs_inv, abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt hB), ← mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_assoc,
← Finset.mul_sum, inv_mul_le_iff hB, mul_one]
· rw [abs_pow, ofReal_pow (abs_nonneg _), abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt hB),
mixedEmbedding.finrank]
· exact this.symm
rw [MeasureTheory.measure_le_eq_lt _ ((convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff 0).mpr rfl)
convexBodySumFun_neg convexBodySumFun_add_le
(fun hx => (convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff _).mp hx)
(fun r x => le_of_eq (convexBodySumFun_smul r x))]
rw [measure_lt_one_eq_integral_div_gamma (g := fun x : (E K) => convexBodySumFun x)
volume ((convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff 0).mpr rfl) convexBodySumFun_neg convexBodySumFun_add_le
(fun hx => (convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff _).mp hx)
(fun r x => le_of_eq (convexBodySumFun_smul r x)) zero_lt_one]
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.finrank, div_one, Gamma_nat_eq_factorial, ofReal_div_of_pos
(Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Nat.factorial_pos _)), Real.rpow_one, ofReal_natCast]
suffices ∫ x : E K, exp (-convexBodySumFun x) =
(2:ℝ) ^ NrRealPlaces K * (π / 2) ^ NrComplexPlaces K by
rw [this, convexBodySumFactor, ofReal_mul (by positivity), ofReal_pow zero_le_two,
ofReal_pow (by positivity), ofReal_div_of_pos zero_lt_two, ofReal_ofNat,
← NNReal.coe_real_pi, ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_div (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr
(Nat.factorial_ne_zero _)), coe_mul, coe_pow, coe_pow, coe_ofNat, coe_div two_ne_zero,
coe_ofNat, coe_natCast]
calc
_ = (∫ x : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ, ∏ w, exp (- ‖x w‖)) *
(∫ x : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ, ∏ w, exp (- 2 * ‖x w‖)) := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun_apply', neg_add, ← neg_mul, Finset.mul_sum,
← Finset.sum_neg_distrib, exp_add, exp_sum, ← integral_prod_mul, volume_eq_prod]
_ = (∫ x : ℝ, exp (-|x|)) ^ NrRealPlaces K *
(∫ x : ℂ, Real.exp (-2 * ‖x‖)) ^ NrComplexPlaces K := by
rw [integral_fintype_prod_eq_pow _ (fun x => exp (- ‖x‖)), integral_fintype_prod_eq_pow _
(fun x => exp (- 2 * ‖x‖))]
simp_rw [norm_eq_abs]
_ = (2 * Gamma (1 / 1 + 1)) ^ NrRealPlaces K *
(π * (2:ℝ) ^ (-(2:ℝ) / 1) * Gamma (2 / 1 + 1)) ^ NrComplexPlaces K := by
rw [integral_comp_abs (f := fun x => exp (- x)), ← integral_exp_neg_rpow zero_lt_one,
← Complex.integral_exp_neg_mul_rpow le_rfl zero_lt_two]
simp_rw [Real.rpow_one]
_ = (2:ℝ) ^ NrRealPlaces K * (π / 2) ^ NrComplexPlaces K := by
simp_rw [div_one, one_add_one_eq_two, Gamma_add_one two_ne_zero, Gamma_two, mul_one,
mul_assoc, ← Real.rpow_add_one two_ne_zero, show (-2:ℝ) + 1 = -1 by norm_num,
Real.rpow_neg_one]
rfl
end convexBodySum
section minkowski
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure FiniteDimensional Zspan Real Submodule
open scoped ENNReal NNReal nonZeroDivisors IntermediateField
variable [NumberField K] (I : (FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K)ˣ)
/-- The bound that appears in **Minkowski Convex Body theorem**, see
`MeasureTheory.exists_ne_zero_mem_lattice_of_measure_mul_two_pow_lt_measure`. See
`NumberField.mixedEmbedding.volume_fundamentalDomain_idealLatticeBasis_eq` and
`NumberField.mixedEmbedding.volume_fundamentalDomain_latticeBasis` for the computation of
`volume (fundamentalDomain (idealLatticeBasis K))`. -/
noncomputable def minkowskiBound : ℝ≥0∞ :=
volume (fundamentalDomain (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I)) * (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (finrank ℝ (E K))
theorem volume_fundamentalDomain_fractionalIdealLatticeBasis :
volume (fundamentalDomain (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I)) =
.ofReal (FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1) * volume (fundamentalDomain (latticeBasis K)) := by
let e : (Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ I) ≃ (Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) := by
refine Fintype.equivOfCardEq ?_
rw [← finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, ← finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex,
fractionalIdeal_rank]
rw [← fundamentalDomain_reindex (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I) e,
measure_fundamentalDomain ((fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I).reindex e)]
· rw [show (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I).reindex e = (mixedEmbedding K) ∘
(basisOfFractionalIdeal K I) ∘ e.symm by
ext1; simp only [Basis.coe_reindex, Function.comp_apply, fractionalIdealLatticeBasis_apply]]
rw [mixedEmbedding.det_basisOfFractionalIdeal_eq_norm]
theorem minkowskiBound_lt_top : minkowskiBound K I < ⊤ := by
refine ENNReal.mul_lt_top ?_ ?_
· exact ne_of_lt (fundamentalDomain_isBounded _).measure_lt_top
· exact ne_of_lt (ENNReal.pow_lt_top (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ENNReal.two_ne_top) _)
theorem minkowskiBound_pos : 0 < minkowskiBound K I := by
refine zero_lt_iff.mpr (mul_ne_zero ?_ ?_)
· exact Zspan.measure_fundamentalDomain_ne_zero _
· exact ENNReal.pow_ne_zero two_ne_zero _
variable {f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0} (I : (FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K)ˣ)
/-- Let `I` be a fractional ideal of `K`. Assume that `f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0` is such that
`minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodyLT K f)` where `convexBodyLT K f` is the set of
points `x` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all infinite places `w` (see `convexBodyLT_volume` for
the computation of this volume), then there exists a nonzero algebraic number `a` in `I` such
that `w a < f w` for all infinite places `w`. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt (h : minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodyLT K f)) :
∃ a ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K), a ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w a < f w := by
have h_fund := Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I) volume
have : Countable (span ℤ (Set.range (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I))).toAddSubgroup := by
change Countable (span ℤ (Set.range (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I)) : Set (E K))
infer_instance
obtain ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, h_nz, h_mem⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_lattice_of_measure_mul_two_pow_lt_measure
h_fund (convexBodyLT_neg_mem K f) (convexBodyLT_convex K f) h
rw [mem_toAddSubgroup, mem_span_fractionalIdealLatticeBasis] at hx
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hx
exact ⟨a, ha, by simpa using h_nz, (convexBodyLT_mem K f).mp h_mem⟩
/-- A version of `exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt` where the absolute value of the real part of `a` is
smaller than `1` at some fixed complex place. This is useful to ensure that `a` is not real. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt' (w₀ : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w})
(h : minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodyLT' K f w₀)) :
∃ a ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K), a ≠ 0 ∧ (∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w ≠ w₀ → w a < f w) ∧
|(w₀.val.embedding a).re| < 1 ∧ |(w₀.val.embedding a).im| < (f w₀ : ℝ) ^ 2:= by
have h_fund := Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I) volume
have : Countable (span ℤ (Set.range (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I))).toAddSubgroup := by
change Countable (span ℤ (Set.range (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I)) : Set (E K))
infer_instance
obtain ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, h_nz, h_mem⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_lattice_of_measure_mul_two_pow_lt_measure
h_fund (convexBodyLT'_neg_mem K f w₀) (convexBodyLT'_convex K f w₀) h
rw [mem_toAddSubgroup, mem_span_fractionalIdealLatticeBasis] at hx
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hx
exact ⟨a, ha, by simpa using h_nz, (convexBodyLT'_mem K f w₀).mp h_mem⟩
/-- A version of `exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt` for the ring of integers of `K`. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_lt (h : minkowskiBound K ↑1 < volume (convexBodyLT K f)) :
∃ a : 𝓞 K, a ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w a < f w := by
obtain ⟨_, h_mem, h_nz, h_bd⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt K ↑1 h
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := (FractionalIdeal.mem_one_iff _).mp h_mem
exact ⟨a, RingOfIntegers.coe_ne_zero_iff.mp h_nz, h_bd⟩
/-- A version of `exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt'` for the ring of integers of `K`. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_lt' (w₀ : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w})
(h : minkowskiBound K ↑1 < volume (convexBodyLT' K f w₀)) :
∃ a : 𝓞 K, a ≠ 0 ∧ (∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w ≠ w₀ → w a < f w) ∧
|(w₀.val.embedding a).re| < 1 ∧ |(w₀.val.embedding a).im| < (f w₀ : ℝ) ^ 2 := by
obtain ⟨_, h_mem, h_nz, h_bd⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt' K ↑1 w₀ h
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := (FractionalIdeal.mem_one_iff _).mp h_mem
exact ⟨a, RingOfIntegers.coe_ne_zero_iff.mp h_nz, h_bd⟩
theorem exists_primitive_element_lt_of_isReal {w₀ : InfinitePlace K} (hw₀ : IsReal w₀) {B : ℝ≥0}
(hB : minkowskiBound K ↑1 < convexBodyLTFactor K * B) :
∃ a : 𝓞 K, ℚ⟮(a : K)⟯ = ⊤ ∧
∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w a < max B 1 := by
have : minkowskiBound K ↑1 < volume (convexBodyLT K (fun w ↦ if w = w₀ then B else 1)) := by
rw [convexBodyLT_volume, ← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₀)]
simp_rw [ite_pow, one_pow]
rw [Finset.prod_ite_eq']
simp_rw [Finset.not_mem_erase, ite_false, mult, hw₀, ite_true, one_mul, pow_one]
exact hB
obtain ⟨a, h_nz, h_le⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_lt K this
refine ⟨a, ?_, fun w ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le (h_le w) ?_⟩
· exact is_primitive_element_of_infinitePlace_lt h_nz
(fun w h_ne ↦ by convert (if_neg h_ne) ▸ h_le w) (Or.inl hw₀)
· split_ifs <;> simp
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/ConvexBody.lean | 563 | 591 | theorem exists_primitive_element_lt_of_isComplex {w₀ : InfinitePlace K} (hw₀ : IsComplex w₀)
{B : ℝ≥0} (hB : minkowskiBound K ↑1 < convexBodyLT'Factor K * B) :
∃ a : 𝓞 K, ℚ⟮(a : K)⟯ = ⊤ ∧
∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w a < Real.sqrt (1 + B ^ 2) := by |
have : minkowskiBound K ↑1 <
volume (convexBodyLT' K (fun w ↦ if w = w₀ then NNReal.sqrt B else 1) ⟨w₀, hw₀⟩) := by
rw [convexBodyLT'_volume, ← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₀)]
simp_rw [ite_pow, one_pow]
rw [Finset.prod_ite_eq']
simp_rw [Finset.not_mem_erase, ite_false, mult, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr hw₀,
ite_true, ite_false, one_mul, NNReal.sq_sqrt]
exact hB
obtain ⟨a, h_nz, h_le, h_le₀⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_lt' K ⟨w₀, hw₀⟩ this
refine ⟨a, ?_, fun w ↦ ?_⟩
· exact is_primitive_element_of_infinitePlace_lt h_nz
(fun w h_ne ↦ by convert if_neg h_ne ▸ h_le w h_ne) (Or.inr h_le₀.1)
· by_cases h_eq : w = w₀
· rw [if_pos rfl] at h_le₀
dsimp only at h_le₀
rw [h_eq, ← norm_embedding_eq, Real.lt_sqrt (norm_nonneg _), ← Complex.re_add_im
(embedding w₀ _), Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.abs_add_mul_I, Real.sq_sqrt (by positivity)]
refine add_lt_add ?_ ?_
· rw [← sq_abs, sq_lt_one_iff (abs_nonneg _)]
exact h_le₀.1
· rw [sq_lt_sq, NNReal.abs_eq, ← NNReal.sq_sqrt B]
exact h_le₀.2
· refine lt_of_lt_of_le (if_neg h_eq ▸ h_le w h_eq) ?_
rw [NNReal.coe_one, Real.le_sqrt' zero_lt_one, one_pow]
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
#align_import algebra.gcd_monoid.finset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
#align_import algebra.gcd_monoid.div from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b537794f8409bc9598febb79cd510b1df5f4539d"
/-!
# GCD and LCM operations on finsets
## Main definitions
- `Finset.gcd` - the greatest common denominator of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
- `Finset.lcm` - the least common multiple of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
## Implementation notes
Many of the proofs use the lemmas `gcd_def` and `lcm_def`, which relate `Finset.gcd`
and `Finset.lcm` to `Multiset.gcd` and `Multiset.lcm`.
TODO: simplify with a tactic and `Data.Finset.Lattice`
## Tags
finset, gcd
-/
variable {ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
open Multiset
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α]
/-! ### lcm -/
section lcm
/-- Least common multiple of a finite set -/
def lcm (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.lcm 1 f
#align finset.lcm Finset.lcm
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem lcm_def : s.lcm f = (s.1.map f).lcm :=
rfl
#align finset.lcm_def Finset.lcm_def
@[simp]
theorem lcm_empty : (∅ : Finset β).lcm f = 1 :=
fold_empty
#align finset.lcm_empty Finset.lcm_empty
@[simp]
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {a : α} : s.lcm f ∣ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.lcm_dvd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
#align finset.lcm_dvd_iff Finset.lcm_dvd_iff
theorem lcm_dvd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a) → s.lcm f ∣ a :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2
#align finset.lcm_dvd Finset.lcm_dvd
theorem dvd_lcm {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ∣ s.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
#align finset.dvd_lcm Finset.dvd_lcm
@[simp]
theorem lcm_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (f b) (s.lcm f) := by
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(lcm_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.lcm f) (Multiset.normalize_lcm (s.1.map f))).2 (dvd_lcm h)]
apply fold_insert h
#align finset.lcm_insert Finset.lcm_insert
@[simp]
theorem lcm_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).lcm f = normalize (f b) :=
Multiset.lcm_singleton
#align finset.lcm_singleton Finset.lcm_singleton
-- Porting note: Priority changed for `simpNF`
@[simp 1100]
theorem normalize_lcm : normalize (s.lcm f) = s.lcm f := by simp [lcm_def]
#align finset.normalize_lcm Finset.normalize_lcm
theorem lcm_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (s₁.lcm f) (s₂.lcm f) :=
Finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, lcm_empty, lcm_one_left, normalize_lcm])
fun a s _ ih ↦ by rw [insert_union, lcm_insert, lcm_insert, ih, lcm_assoc]
#align finset.lcm_union Finset.lcm_union
theorem lcm_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.lcm f = s₂.lcm g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
#align finset.lcm_congr Finset.lcm_congr
theorem lcm_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.lcm f ∣ s.lcm g :=
lcm_dvd fun b hb ↦ (h b hb).trans (dvd_lcm hb)
#align finset.lcm_mono_fun Finset.lcm_mono_fun
theorem lcm_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.lcm f ∣ s₂.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd fun _ hb ↦ dvd_lcm (h hb)
#align finset.lcm_mono Finset.lcm_mono
theorem lcm_image [DecidableEq β] {g : γ → β} (s : Finset γ) :
(s.image g).lcm f = s.lcm (f ∘ g) := by
classical induction' s using Finset.induction with c s _ ih <;> simp [*]
#align finset.lcm_image Finset.lcm_image
theorem lcm_eq_lcm_image [DecidableEq α] : s.lcm f = (s.image f).lcm id :=
Eq.symm <| lcm_image _
#align finset.lcm_eq_lcm_image Finset.lcm_eq_lcm_image
theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial α] : s.lcm f = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ f '' s := by
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, lcm_def, Multiset.lcm_eq_zero_iff, Set.mem_image, mem_coe, ←
Finset.mem_def]
#align finset.lcm_eq_zero_iff Finset.lcm_eq_zero_iff
end lcm
/-! ### gcd -/
section gcd
/-- Greatest common divisor of a finite set -/
def gcd (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.gcd 0 f
#align finset.gcd Finset.gcd
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem gcd_def : s.gcd f = (s.1.map f).gcd :=
rfl
#align finset.gcd_def Finset.gcd_def
@[simp]
theorem gcd_empty : (∅ : Finset β).gcd f = 0 :=
fold_empty
#align finset.gcd_empty Finset.gcd_empty
theorem dvd_gcd_iff {a : α} : a ∣ s.gcd f ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ f b := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.dvd_gcd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
#align finset.dvd_gcd_iff Finset.dvd_gcd_iff
theorem gcd_dvd {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : s.gcd f ∣ f b :=
dvd_gcd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
#align finset.gcd_dvd Finset.gcd_dvd
theorem dvd_gcd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ f b) → a ∣ s.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd_iff.2
#align finset.dvd_gcd Finset.dvd_gcd
@[simp]
theorem gcd_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).gcd f = GCDMonoid.gcd (f b) (s.gcd f) := by
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(gcd_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.gcd f) (Multiset.normalize_gcd (s.1.map f))).2 (gcd_dvd h)]
apply fold_insert h
#align finset.gcd_insert Finset.gcd_insert
@[simp]
theorem gcd_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).gcd f = normalize (f b) :=
Multiset.gcd_singleton
#align finset.gcd_singleton Finset.gcd_singleton
-- Porting note: Priority changed for `simpNF`
@[simp 1100]
theorem normalize_gcd : normalize (s.gcd f) = s.gcd f := by simp [gcd_def]
#align finset.normalize_gcd Finset.normalize_gcd
theorem gcd_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).gcd f = GCDMonoid.gcd (s₁.gcd f) (s₂.gcd f) :=
Finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, gcd_empty, gcd_zero_left, normalize_gcd])
fun a s _ ih ↦ by rw [insert_union, gcd_insert, gcd_insert, ih, gcd_assoc]
#align finset.gcd_union Finset.gcd_union
theorem gcd_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.gcd f = s₂.gcd g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
#align finset.gcd_congr Finset.gcd_congr
theorem gcd_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.gcd f ∣ s.gcd g :=
dvd_gcd fun b hb ↦ (gcd_dvd hb).trans (h b hb)
#align finset.gcd_mono_fun Finset.gcd_mono_fun
theorem gcd_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.gcd f ∣ s₁.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd fun _ hb ↦ gcd_dvd (h hb)
#align finset.gcd_mono Finset.gcd_mono
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Finset.lean | 203 | 205 | theorem gcd_image [DecidableEq β] {g : γ → β} (s : Finset γ) :
(s.image g).gcd f = s.gcd (f ∘ g) := by |
classical induction' s using Finset.induction with c s _ ih <;> simp [*]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
#align_import topology.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs products, sums, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, sum, disjoint union, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance instTopologicalSpaceSubtype {p : X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Subtype p) :=
induced (↑) t
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceProd [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X × Y) :=
induced Prod.fst t₁ ⊓ induced Prod.snd t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSum [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
coinduced Sum.inl t₁ ⊔ coinduced Sum.inr t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
#align Pi.topological_space Pi.topologicalSpace
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
#align ulift.topological_space ULift.topologicalSpace
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_mul continuous_ofMul
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_mul continuous_toMul
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_add continuous_ofAdd
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_add continuous_toAdd
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_mul isOpenMap_ofMul
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_mul isOpenMap_toMul
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_add isOpenMap_ofAdd
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_add isOpenMap_toAdd
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_mul isClosedMap_ofMul
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_mul isClosedMap_toMul
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_add isClosedMap_ofAdd
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_add isClosedMap_toAdd
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_mul nhds_ofMul
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_add nhds_ofAdd
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 (toMul x) = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_mul nhds_toMul
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 (toAdd x) = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_add nhds_toAdd
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_dual continuous_toDual
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_dual continuous_ofDual
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_dual isOpenMap_toDual
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_dual isOpenMap_ofDual
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_dual isClosedMap_toDual
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_dual isClosedMap_ofDual
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_dual nhds_toDual
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_dual nhds_ofDual
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
#align quotient.preimage_mem_nhds Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
#align dense.quotient Dense.quotient
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
#align dense_range.quotient DenseRange.quotient
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
#align sum.discrete_topology Sum.discreteTopology
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
#align sigma.discrete_topology Sigma.discreteTopology
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
#align mem_nhds_subtype mem_nhds_subtype
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
#align nhds_subtype nhds_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
#align nhds_within_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_ne_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align discrete_topology_subtype_iff discreteTopology_subtype_iff
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
#align cofinite_topology CofiniteTopology
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
#align cofinite_topology.of CofiniteTopology.of
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff' CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff'
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
#align cofinite_topology.is_closed_iff CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
#align cofinite_topology.nhds_eq CofiniteTopology.nhds_eq
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
#align cofinite_topology.mem_nhds_iff CofiniteTopology.mem_nhds_iff
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
[TopologicalSpace ε] [TopologicalSpace ζ]
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean 4 fails to deduce implicit args
@[simp] theorem continuous_prod_mk {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} :
(Continuous fun x => (f x, g x)) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
(@continuous_inf_rng X (Y × Z) _ _ (TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _)).trans <|
continuous_induced_rng.and continuous_induced_rng
#align continuous_prod_mk continuous_prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_fst : Continuous (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).1
#align continuous_fst continuous_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.fst {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).1 :=
continuous_fst.comp hf
#align continuous.fst Continuous.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.fst' {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.fst :=
hf.comp continuous_fst
#align continuous.fst' Continuous.fst'
theorem continuousAt_fst {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.fst p :=
continuous_fst.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_fst continuousAt_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.fst {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).1) x :=
continuousAt_fst.comp hf
#align continuous_at.fst ContinuousAt.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst' {f : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst' ContinuousAt.fst'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst'' {f : X → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.fst) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst'' ContinuousAt.fst''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).1) l (𝓝 <| p.1) :=
continuousAt_fst.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_snd : Continuous (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).2
#align continuous_snd continuous_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.snd {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).2 :=
continuous_snd.comp hf
#align continuous.snd Continuous.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.snd' {f : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.snd :=
hf.comp continuous_snd
#align continuous.snd' Continuous.snd'
theorem continuousAt_snd {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.snd p :=
continuous_snd.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_snd continuousAt_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.snd {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).2) x :=
continuousAt_snd.comp hf
#align continuous_at.snd ContinuousAt.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd' {f : Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd' ContinuousAt.snd'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd'' {f : Y → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.snd) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd'' ContinuousAt.snd''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).2) l (𝓝 <| p.2) :=
continuousAt_snd.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.prod_mk {f : Z → X} {g : Z → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => (f x, g x) :=
continuous_prod_mk.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.prod_mk Continuous.prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk (x : X) : Continuous fun y : Y => (x, y) :=
continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align continuous.prod.mk Continuous.Prod.mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk_left (y : Y) : Continuous fun x : X => (x, y) :=
continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const
#align continuous.prod.mk_left Continuous.Prod.mk_left
/-- If `f x y` is continuous in `x` for all `y ∈ s`,
then the set of `x` such that `f x` maps `s` to `t` is closed. -/
lemma IsClosed.setOf_mapsTo {α : Type*} {f : X → α → Z} {s : Set α} {t : Set Z} (ht : IsClosed t)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Continuous (f · a)) : IsClosed {x | MapsTo (f x) s t} := by
simpa only [MapsTo, setOf_forall] using isClosed_biInter fun y hy ↦ ht.preimage (hf y hy)
theorem Continuous.comp₂ {g : X × Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w) :=
hg.comp <| he.prod_mk hf
#align continuous.comp₂ Continuous.comp₂
theorem Continuous.comp₃ {g : X × Y × Z → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) :
Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w) :=
hg.comp₂ he <| hf.prod_mk hk
#align continuous.comp₃ Continuous.comp₃
theorem Continuous.comp₄ {g : X × Y × Z × ζ → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) {l : W → ζ}
(hl : Continuous l) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w, l w) :=
hg.comp₃ he hf <| hk.prod_mk hl
#align continuous.comp₄ Continuous.comp₄
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.prod_map {f : Z → X} {g : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun p : Z × W => (f p.1, g p.2) :=
hf.fst'.prod_mk hg.snd'
#align continuous.prod_map Continuous.prod_map
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_left₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta1; haveI := tb1; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta1 tb1 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_left₂ continuous_inf_dom_left₂
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_right₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta2; haveI := tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta2 tb2 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_right₂ continuous_inf_dom_right₂
/-- A version of `continuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_sInf_dom₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {tas : Set (TopologicalSpace X)}
{tbs : Set (TopologicalSpace Y)} {tX : TopologicalSpace X} {tY : TopologicalSpace Y}
{tc : TopologicalSpace Z} (hX : tX ∈ tas) (hY : tY ∈ tbs)
(hf : Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf tas; haveI := sInf tbs;
exact @Continuous _ _ _ tc fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have hX := continuous_sInf_dom hX continuous_id
have hY := continuous_sInf_dom hY continuous_id
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ tX tY (sInf tas) (sInf tbs) _ _ hX hY
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_continuous_id
#align continuous_Inf_dom₂ continuous_sInf_dom₂
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds {p : X → Prop} {x : X} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (y : Y) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).1 :=
continuousAt_fst h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds {p : Y → Prop} {y : Y} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) (x : X) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).2 :=
continuousAt_snd h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds {px : X → Prop} {x} (hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, px x) {py : Y → Prop}
{y} (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, py y) : ∀ᶠ p in 𝓝 (x, y), px (p : X × Y).1 ∧ py p.2 :=
(hx.prod_inl_nhds y).and (hy.prod_inr_nhds x)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds
theorem continuous_swap : Continuous (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) :=
continuous_snd.prod_mk continuous_fst
#align continuous_swap continuous_swap
lemma isClosedMap_swap : IsClosedMap (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) := fun s hs ↦ by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
exact hs.preimage continuous_swap
theorem Continuous.uncurry_left {f : X → Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous (f x) :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk _)
#align continuous_uncurry_left Continuous.uncurry_left
theorem Continuous.uncurry_right {f : X → Y → Z} (y : Y) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous fun a => f a y :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk_left _)
#align continuous_uncurry_right Continuous.uncurry_right
-- 2024-03-09
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_left := Continuous.uncurry_left
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_right := Continuous.uncurry_right
theorem continuous_curry {g : X × Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous g) : Continuous (curry g x) :=
Continuous.uncurry_left x h
#align continuous_curry continuous_curry
theorem IsOpen.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).inter (ht.preimage continuous_snd)
#align is_open.prod IsOpen.prod
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean fails to find `t₁` and `t₂` by unification
theorem nhds_prod_eq {x : X} {y : Y} : 𝓝 (x, y) = 𝓝 x ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, instTopologicalSpaceProd, nhds_inf (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _), nhds_induced, nhds_induced]
#align nhds_prod_eq nhds_prod_eq
-- Porting note: moved from `Topology.ContinuousOn`
theorem nhdsWithin_prod_eq (x : X) (y : Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (x, y) = 𝓝[s] x ×ˢ 𝓝[t] y := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
#align nhds_within_prod_eq nhdsWithin_prod_eq
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝 y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff mem_nhds_prod_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} {tx : Set X} {ty : Set Y} :
s ∈ 𝓝[tx ×ˢ ty] (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[tx] x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝[ty] y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds {ιX ιY : Type*} {px : ιX → Prop} {py : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : (𝓝 x).HasBasis px sx)
(hy : (𝓝 y).HasBasis py sy) :
(𝓝 (x, y)).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => px i.1 ∧ py i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact hx.prod hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds' {ιX ιY : Type*} {pX : ιX → Prop} {pY : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {p : X × Y} (hx : (𝓝 p.1).HasBasis pX sx)
(hy : (𝓝 p.2).HasBasis pY sy) :
(𝓝 p).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => pX i.1 ∧ pY i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 :=
hx.prod_nhds hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds' Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds'
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff' {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).prod_nhds (nhds_basis_opens y)).mem_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Prod.exists, and_comm, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff' mem_nhds_prod_iff'
theorem Prod.tendsto_iff {X} (seq : X → Y × Z) {f : Filter X} (p : Y × Z) :
Tendsto seq f (𝓝 p) ↔
Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).fst) f (𝓝 p.fst) ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).snd) f (𝓝 p.snd) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.tendsto_prod_iff']
#align prod.tendsto_iff Prod.tendsto_iff
instance [DiscreteTopology X] [DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X × Y) :=
discreteTopology_iff_nhds.2 fun (a, b) => by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete X, nhds_discrete Y, prod_pure_pure]
theorem prod_mem_nhds_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 y := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, prod_mem_prod_iff]
#align prod_mem_nhds_iff prod_mem_nhds_iff
theorem prod_mem_nhds {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hy : t ∈ 𝓝 y) :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) :=
prod_mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
#align prod_mem_nhds prod_mem_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds : IsOpen { p : X × X | Disjoint (𝓝 p.1) (𝓝 p.2) } := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, Prod.forall, mem_setOf_eq]
intro x y h
obtain ⟨U, hU, V, hV, hd⟩ := ((nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y)).mp h
exact mem_nhds_prod_iff'.mpr ⟨U, V, hU.2, hU.1, hV.2, hV.1, fun ⟨x', y'⟩ ⟨hx', hy'⟩ =>
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem hd (hU.2.mem_nhds hx') (hV.2.mem_nhds hy')⟩
#align is_open_set_of_disjoint_nhds_nhds isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, q y) : ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x, y), p z.1 ∧ q z.2 :=
prod_mem_nhds hx hy
#align filter.eventually.prod_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds
theorem nhds_swap (x : X) (y : Y) : 𝓝 (x, y) = (𝓝 (y, x)).map Prod.swap := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.prod_comm, nhds_prod_eq]; rfl
#align nhds_swap nhds_swap
theorem Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds {γ} {x : X} {y : Y} {f : Filter γ} {mx : γ → X} {my : γ → Y}
(hx : Tendsto mx f (𝓝 x)) (hy : Tendsto my f (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun c => (mx c, my c)) f (𝓝 (x, y)) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk hx hy
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds {p : X × Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p x) : ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ y' in 𝓝 y, p (x', y') := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq] at h
exact h.curry
#align filter.eventually.curry_nhds Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.prod {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
hf.prod_mk_nhds hg
#align continuous_at.prod ContinuousAt.prod
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {p : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f p.fst)
(hg : ContinuousAt g p.snd) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) p :=
hf.fst''.prod hg.snd''
#align continuous_at.prod_map ContinuousAt.prod_map
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map' {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g y) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) (x, y) :=
hf.fst'.prod hg.snd'
#align continuous_at.prod_map' ContinuousAt.prod_map'
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂ {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f (g x, h x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf (hg.prod hh)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_of_eq {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y × Z}
(hf : ContinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) (e : (g x, h x) = y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x := by
rw [← e] at hf
exact hf.comp₂ hg hh
/-- Continuous functions on products are continuous in their first argument -/
theorem Continuous.curry_left {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {y : Y} :
Continuous fun x ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
alias Continuous.along_fst := Continuous.curry_left
/-- Continuous functions on products are continuous in their second argument -/
theorem Continuous.curry_right {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {x : X} :
Continuous fun y ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id)
alias Continuous.along_snd := Continuous.curry_right
-- todo: prove a version of `generateFrom_union` with `image2 (∩) s t` in the LHS and use it here
theorem prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq {X Y : Type*} {s : Set (Set X)} {t : Set (Set Y)}
(hs : ⋃₀ s = univ) (ht : ⋃₀ t = univ) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Y (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) =
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t) :=
let G := generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t)
le_antisymm
(le_generateFrom fun g ⟨u, hu, v, hv, g_eq⟩ =>
g_eq.symm ▸
@IsOpen.prod _ _ (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) _ _ (GenerateOpen.basic _ hu)
(GenerateOpen.basic _ hv))
(le_inf
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun u hu =>
have : ⋃ v ∈ t, u ×ˢ v = Prod.fst ⁻¹' u := by
simp_rw [← prod_iUnion, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, ht, prod_univ]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.fst ⁻¹' u) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun v =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hv => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun v hv =>
have : ⋃ u ∈ s, u ×ˢ v = Prod.snd ⁻¹' v := by
simp_rw [← iUnion_prod_const, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, hs, univ_prod]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.snd ⁻¹' v) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun u =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hu => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩))
#align prod_generate_from_generate_from_eq prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq
-- todo: use the previous lemma?
theorem prod_eq_generateFrom :
instTopologicalSpaceProd =
generateFrom { g | ∃ (s : Set X) (t : Set Y), IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ g = s ×ˢ t } :=
le_antisymm (le_generateFrom fun g ⟨s, t, hs, ht, g_eq⟩ => g_eq.symm ▸ hs.prod ht)
(le_inf
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨t, univ, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩)
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨univ, t, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩))
#align prod_eq_generate_from prod_eq_generateFrom
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: align with `mem_nhds_prod_iff'`
theorem isOpen_prod_iff {s : Set (X × Y)} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s →
∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ a ∈ u ∧ b ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.trans <| by simp_rw [Prod.forall, mem_nhds_prod_iff', and_left_comm]
#align is_open_prod_iff isOpen_prod_iff
/-- A product of induced topologies is induced by the product map -/
theorem prod_induced_induced (f : X → Y) (g : Z → W) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Z (induced f ‹_›) (induced g ‹_›) =
induced (fun p => (f p.1, g p.2)) instTopologicalSpaceProd := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceProd
simp_rw [induced_inf, induced_compose]
rfl
#align prod_induced_induced prod_induced_induced
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology_left
/-- Given a neighborhood `s` of `(x, x)`, then `(x, x)` has a square open neighborhood
that is a subset of `s`. -/
theorem exists_nhds_square {s : Set (X × X)} {x : X} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 (x, x)) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ U ×ˢ U ⊆ s := by
simpa [nhds_prod_eq, (nhds_basis_opens x).prod_self.mem_iff, and_assoc, and_left_comm] using hx
#align exists_nhds_square exists_nhds_square
/-- `Prod.fst` maps neighborhood of `x : X × Y` within the section `Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}`
to `𝓝 x.1`. -/
theorem map_fst_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝[Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}] x) = 𝓝 x.1 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_fst.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hu fun z hz => H _ hz _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hv) rfl
#align map_fst_nhds_within map_fst_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.1 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_fst <| (map_fst_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_fst_nhds map_fst_nhds
/-- The first projection in a product of topological spaces sends open sets to open sets. -/
theorem isOpenMap_fst : IsOpenMap (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_fst_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_fst isOpenMap_fst
/-- `Prod.snd` maps neighborhood of `x : X × Y` within the section `Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}`
to `𝓝 x.2`. -/
theorem map_snd_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝[Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}] x) = 𝓝 x.2 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_snd.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hv fun z hz => H _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hu) _ hz rfl
#align map_snd_nhds_within map_snd_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.2 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_snd <| (map_snd_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_snd_nhds map_snd_nhds
/-- The second projection in a product of topological spaces sends open sets to open sets. -/
theorem isOpenMap_snd : IsOpenMap (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_snd_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_snd isOpenMap_snd
/-- A product set is open in a product space if and only if each factor is open, or one of them is
empty -/
theorem isOpen_prod_iff' {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} :
IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) ↔ IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
· have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := prod_nonempty_iff.1 h
constructor
· intro (H : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t))
refine Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· show IsOpen s
rw [← fst_image_prod s st.2]
exact isOpenMap_fst _ H
· show IsOpen t
rw [← snd_image_prod st.1 t]
exact isOpenMap_snd _ H
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, not_false_iff, or_false_iff] at H
exact H.1.prod H.2
#align is_open_prod_iff' isOpen_prod_iff'
theorem closure_prod_eq {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} : closure (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ closure t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
simp_rw [mem_prod, mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_prod_eq, prod_neBot]
#align closure_prod_eq closure_prod_eq
theorem interior_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) : interior (s ×ˢ t) = interior s ×ˢ interior t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp only [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_prod, prod_mem_nhds_iff]
#align interior_prod_eq interior_prod_eq
theorem frontier_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
frontier (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ frontier t ∪ frontier s ×ˢ closure t := by
simp only [frontier, closure_prod_eq, interior_prod_eq, prod_diff_prod]
#align frontier_prod_eq frontier_prod_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_prod_univ_eq (s : Set X) :
frontier (s ×ˢ (univ : Set Y)) = frontier s ×ˢ univ := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_prod_univ_eq frontier_prod_univ_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ_prod_eq (s : Set Y) :
frontier ((univ : Set X) ×ˢ s) = univ ×ˢ frontier s := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_univ_prod_eq frontier_univ_prod_eq
theorem map_mem_closure₂ {f : X → Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {u : Set Z}
(hf : Continuous (uncurry f)) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure t)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b ∈ u) : f x y ∈ closure u :=
have H₁ : (x, y) ∈ closure (s ×ˢ t) := by simpa only [closure_prod_eq] using mk_mem_prod hx hy
have H₂ : MapsTo (uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) u := forall_prod_set.2 h
H₂.closure hf H₁
#align map_mem_closure₂ map_mem_closure₂
theorem IsClosed.prod {s₁ : Set X} {s₂ : Set Y} (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) :
IsClosed (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) :=
closure_eq_iff_isClosed.mp <| by simp only [h₁.closure_eq, h₂.closure_eq, closure_prod_eq]
#align is_closed.prod IsClosed.prod
/-- The product of two dense sets is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : Dense s) (ht : Dense t) : Dense (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun x => by
rw [closure_prod_eq]
exact ⟨hs x.1, ht x.2⟩
#align dense.prod Dense.prod
/-- If `f` and `g` are maps with dense range, then `Prod.map f g` has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.prod_map {ι : Type*} {κ : Type*} {f : ι → Y} {g : κ → Z} (hf : DenseRange f)
(hg : DenseRange g) : DenseRange (Prod.map f g) := by
simpa only [DenseRange, prod_range_range_eq] using hf.prod hg
#align dense_range.prod_map DenseRange.prod_map
theorem Inducing.prod_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Inducing f) (hg : Inducing g) :
Inducing (Prod.map f g) :=
inducing_iff_nhds.2 fun (x, z) => by simp_rw [Prod.map_def, nhds_prod_eq, hf.nhds_eq_comap,
hg.nhds_eq_comap, prod_comap_comap_eq]
#align inducing.prod_mk Inducing.prod_map
@[simp]
theorem inducing_const_prod {x : X} {f : Y → Z} : (Inducing fun x' => (x, f x')) ↔ Inducing f := by
simp_rw [inducing_iff, instTopologicalSpaceProd, induced_inf, induced_compose, Function.comp,
induced_const, top_inf_eq]
#align inducing_const_prod inducing_const_prod
@[simp]
theorem inducing_prod_const {y : Y} {f : X → Z} : (Inducing fun x => (f x, y)) ↔ Inducing f := by
simp_rw [inducing_iff, instTopologicalSpaceProd, induced_inf, induced_compose, Function.comp,
induced_const, inf_top_eq]
#align inducing_prod_const inducing_prod_const
theorem Embedding.prod_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Embedding f) (hg : Embedding g) :
Embedding (Prod.map f g) :=
{ hf.toInducing.prod_map hg.toInducing with
inj := fun ⟨x₁, z₁⟩ ⟨x₂, z₂⟩ => by simp [hf.inj.eq_iff, hg.inj.eq_iff] }
#align embedding.prod_mk Embedding.prod_map
protected theorem IsOpenMap.prod {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hg : IsOpenMap g) :
IsOpenMap fun p : X × Z => (f p.1, g p.2) := by
rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le]
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_prod_eq, ← Filter.prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono (hf.nhds_le a) (hg.nhds_le b)
#align is_open_map.prod IsOpenMap.prod
protected theorem OpenEmbedding.prod {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : OpenEmbedding f)
(hg : OpenEmbedding g) : OpenEmbedding fun x : X × Z => (f x.1, g x.2) :=
openEmbedding_of_embedding_open (hf.1.prod_map hg.1) (hf.isOpenMap.prod hg.isOpenMap)
#align open_embedding.prod OpenEmbedding.prod
theorem embedding_graph {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Embedding fun x => (x, f x) :=
embedding_of_embedding_compose (continuous_id.prod_mk hf) continuous_fst embedding_id
#align embedding_graph embedding_graph
theorem embedding_prod_mk (x : X) : Embedding (Prod.mk x : Y → X × Y) :=
embedding_of_embedding_compose (Continuous.Prod.mk x) continuous_snd embedding_id
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Sum
open Sum
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
theorem continuous_sum_dom {f : X ⊕ Y → Z} :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∧ Continuous (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
(continuous_sup_dom (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.coinduced Sum.inl _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.coinduced Sum.inr _)).trans <|
continuous_coinduced_dom.and continuous_coinduced_dom
#align continuous_sum_dom continuous_sum_dom
theorem continuous_sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} :
Continuous (Sum.elim f g) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
continuous_sum_dom
#align continuous_sum_elim continuous_sum_elim
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (Sum.elim f g) :=
continuous_sum_elim.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.sum_elim Continuous.sum_elim
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_isLeft : Continuous (isLeft : X ⊕ Y → Bool) :=
continuous_sum_dom.2 ⟨continuous_const, continuous_const⟩
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_isRight : Continuous (isRight : X ⊕ Y → Bool) :=
continuous_sum_dom.2 ⟨continuous_const, continuous_const⟩
@[continuity]
-- Porting note: the proof was `continuous_sup_rng_left continuous_coinduced_rng`
theorem continuous_inl : Continuous (@inl X Y) := ⟨fun _ => And.left⟩
#align continuous_inl continuous_inl
@[continuity]
-- Porting note: the proof was `continuous_sup_rng_right continuous_coinduced_rng`
theorem continuous_inr : Continuous (@inr X Y) := ⟨fun _ => And.right⟩
#align continuous_inr continuous_inr
theorem isOpen_sum_iff {s : Set (X ⊕ Y)} : IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen (inl ⁻¹' s) ∧ IsOpen (inr ⁻¹' s) :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_open_sum_iff isOpen_sum_iff
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem isClosed_sum_iff {s : Set (X ⊕ Y)} :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed (inl ⁻¹' s) ∧ IsClosed (inr ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_compl]
theorem isOpenMap_inl : IsOpenMap (@inl X Y) := fun u hu => by
simpa [isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_image_eq u Sum.inl_injective]
#align is_open_map_inl isOpenMap_inl
theorem isOpenMap_inr : IsOpenMap (@inr X Y) := fun u hu => by
simpa [isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_image_eq u Sum.inr_injective]
#align is_open_map_inr isOpenMap_inr
theorem openEmbedding_inl : OpenEmbedding (@inl X Y) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_inl inl_injective isOpenMap_inl
#align open_embedding_inl openEmbedding_inl
theorem openEmbedding_inr : OpenEmbedding (@inr X Y) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_inr inr_injective isOpenMap_inr
#align open_embedding_inr openEmbedding_inr
theorem embedding_inl : Embedding (@inl X Y) :=
openEmbedding_inl.1
#align embedding_inl embedding_inl
theorem embedding_inr : Embedding (@inr X Y) :=
openEmbedding_inr.1
#align embedding_inr embedding_inr
theorem isOpen_range_inl : IsOpen (range (inl : X → X ⊕ Y)) :=
openEmbedding_inl.2
#align is_open_range_inl isOpen_range_inl
theorem isOpen_range_inr : IsOpen (range (inr : Y → X ⊕ Y)) :=
openEmbedding_inr.2
#align is_open_range_inr isOpen_range_inr
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 1,003 | 1,005 | theorem isClosed_range_inl : IsClosed (range (inl : X → X ⊕ Y)) := by |
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_range_inl]
exact isOpen_range_inr
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.InverseFunctionTheorem.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.log_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6a5c85000ab93fe5dcfdf620676f614ba8e18c26"
/-!
# Differentiability of the complex `log` function
-/
open Set Filter
open scoped Real Topology
namespace Complex
theorem isOpenMap_exp : IsOpenMap exp :=
isOpenMap_of_hasStrictDerivAt hasStrictDerivAt_exp exp_ne_zero
#align complex.is_open_map_exp Complex.isOpenMap_exp
/-- `Complex.exp` as a `PartialHomeomorph` with `source = {z | -π < im z < π}` and
`target = {z | 0 < re z} ∪ {z | im z ≠ 0}`. This definition is used to prove that `Complex.log`
is complex differentiable at all points but the negative real semi-axis. -/
noncomputable def expPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℂ ℂ :=
PartialHomeomorph.ofContinuousOpen
{ toFun := exp
invFun := log
source := {z : ℂ | z.im ∈ Ioo (-π) π}
target := slitPlane
map_source' := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨h₁ : -π < y, h₂ : y < π⟩
refine (not_or_of_imp fun hz => ?_).symm
obtain rfl : y = 0 := by
rw [exp_im] at hz
simpa [(Real.exp_pos _).ne', Real.sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt h₁ h₂] using hz
rw [← ofReal_def, exp_ofReal_re]
exact Real.exp_pos x
map_target' := fun z h => by
simp only [mem_setOf, log_im, mem_Ioo, neg_pi_lt_arg, arg_lt_pi_iff, true_and]
exact h.imp_left le_of_lt
left_inv' := fun x hx => log_exp hx.1 (le_of_lt hx.2)
right_inv' := fun x hx => exp_log <| slitPlane_ne_zero hx }
continuous_exp.continuousOn isOpenMap_exp (isOpen_Ioo.preimage continuous_im)
#align complex.exp_local_homeomorph Complex.expPartialHomeomorph
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_log {x : ℂ} (h : x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt log x⁻¹ x :=
have h0 : x ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero h
expPartialHomeomorph.hasStrictDerivAt_symm h h0 <| by
simpa [exp_log h0] using hasStrictDerivAt_exp (log x)
#align complex.has_strict_deriv_at_log Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_log
lemma hasDerivAt_log {z : ℂ} (hz : z ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt log z⁻¹ z :=
HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt <| hasStrictDerivAt_log hz
lemma differentiableAt_log {z : ℂ} (hz : z ∈ slitPlane) : DifferentiableAt ℂ log z :=
(hasDerivAt_log hz).differentiableAt
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_log_real {x : ℂ} (h : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt log (x⁻¹ • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_log h).complexToReal_fderiv
#align complex.has_strict_fderiv_at_log_real Complex.hasStrictFDerivAt_log_real
theorem contDiffAt_log {x : ℂ} (h : x ∈ slitPlane) {n : ℕ∞} : ContDiffAt ℂ n log x :=
expPartialHomeomorph.contDiffAt_symm_deriv (exp_ne_zero <| log x) h (hasDerivAt_exp _)
contDiff_exp.contDiffAt
#align complex.cont_diff_at_log Complex.contDiffAt_log
end Complex
section LogDeriv
open Complex Filter
open scoped Topology
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.clog {f : E → ℂ} {f' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ} {x : E} (h₁ : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(h₂ : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun t => log (f t)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_log h₂).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x h₁
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.clog HasStrictFDerivAt.clog
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.clog {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} (h₁ : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(h₂ : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun t => log (f t)) (f' / f x) x := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul]; exact (hasStrictDerivAt_log h₂).comp x h₁
#align has_strict_deriv_at.clog HasStrictDerivAt.clog
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.clog_real {f : ℝ → ℂ} {x : ℝ} {f' : ℂ} (h₁ : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(h₂ : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun t => log (f t)) (f' / f x) x := by
simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul] using (hasStrictFDerivAt_log_real h₂).comp_hasStrictDerivAt x h₁
#align has_strict_deriv_at.clog_real HasStrictDerivAt.clog_real
theorem HasFDerivAt.clog {f : E → ℂ} {f' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ} {x : E} (h₁ : HasFDerivAt f f' x)
(h₂ : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun t => log (f t)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_log h₂).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x h₁
#align has_fderiv_at.clog HasFDerivAt.clog
theorem HasDerivAt.clog {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} (h₁ : HasDerivAt f f' x)
(h₂ : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt (fun t => log (f t)) (f' / f x) x := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul]; exact (hasStrictDerivAt_log h₂).hasDerivAt.comp x h₁
#align has_deriv_at.clog HasDerivAt.clog
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/LogDeriv.lean | 110 | 113 | theorem HasDerivAt.clog_real {f : ℝ → ℂ} {x : ℝ} {f' : ℂ} (h₁ : HasDerivAt f f' x)
(h₂ : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt (fun t => log (f t)) (f' / f x) x := by |
simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul] using
(hasStrictFDerivAt_log_real h₂).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt x h₁
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.PProd
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ker
#align_import order.filter.bases from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"996b0ff959da753a555053a480f36e5f264d4207"
/-!
# Filter bases
A filter basis `B : FilterBasis α` on a type `α` is a nonempty collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element of
the collection. Compared to filters, filter bases do not require that any set containing
an element of `B` belongs to `B`.
A filter basis `B` can be used to construct `B.filter : Filter α` such that a set belongs
to `B.filter` if and only if it contains an element of `B`.
Given an indexing type `ι`, a predicate `p : ι → Prop`, and a map `s : ι → Set α`,
the proposition `h : Filter.IsBasis p s` makes sure the range of `s` bounded by `p`
(ie. `s '' setOf p`) defines a filter basis `h.filterBasis`.
If one already has a filter `l` on `α`, `Filter.HasBasis l p s` (where `p : ι → Prop`
and `s : ι → Set α` as above) means that a set belongs to `l` if and
only if it contains some `s i` with `p i`. It implies `h : Filter.IsBasis p s`, and
`l = h.filterBasis.filter`. The point of this definition is that checking statements
involving elements of `l` often reduces to checking them on the basis elements.
We define a function `HasBasis.index (h : Filter.HasBasis l p s) (t) (ht : t ∈ l)` that returns
some index `i` such that `p i` and `s i ⊆ t`. This function can be useful to avoid manual
destruction of `h.mem_iff.mpr ht` using `cases` or `let`.
This file also introduces more restricted classes of bases, involving monotonicity or
countability. In particular, for `l : Filter α`, `l.IsCountablyGenerated` means
there is a countable set of sets which generates `s`. This is reformulated in term of bases,
and consequences are derived.
## Main statements
* `Filter.HasBasis.mem_iff`, `HasBasis.mem_of_superset`, `HasBasis.mem_of_mem` : restate `t ∈ f` in
terms of a basis;
* `Filter.basis_sets` : all sets of a filter form a basis;
* `Filter.HasBasis.inf`, `Filter.HasBasis.inf_principal`, `Filter.HasBasis.prod`,
`Filter.HasBasis.prod_self`, `Filter.HasBasis.map`, `Filter.HasBasis.comap` : combinators to
construct filters of `l ⊓ l'`, `l ⊓ 𝓟 t`, `l ×ˢ l'`, `l ×ˢ l`, `l.map f`, `l.comap f`
respectively;
* `Filter.HasBasis.le_iff`, `Filter.HasBasis.ge_iff`, `Filter.HasBasis.le_basis_iff` : restate
`l ≤ l'` in terms of bases.
* `Filter.HasBasis.tendsto_right_iff`, `Filter.HasBasis.tendsto_left_iff`,
`Filter.HasBasis.tendsto_iff` : restate `Tendsto f l l'` in terms of bases.
* `isCountablyGenerated_iff_exists_antitone_basis` : proves a filter is countably generated if and
only if it admits a basis parametrized by a decreasing sequence of sets indexed by `ℕ`.
* `tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto` : an abstract version of "sequentially continuous implies continuous".
## Implementation notes
As with `Set.iUnion`/`biUnion`/`Set.sUnion`, there are three different approaches to filter bases:
* `Filter.HasBasis l s`, `s : Set (Set α)`;
* `Filter.HasBasis l s`, `s : ι → Set α`;
* `Filter.HasBasis l p s`, `p : ι → Prop`, `s : ι → Set α`.
We use the latter one because, e.g., `𝓝 x` in an `EMetricSpace` or in a `MetricSpace` has a basis
of this form. The other two can be emulated using `s = id` or `p = fun _ ↦ True`.
With this approach sometimes one needs to `simp` the statement provided by the `Filter.HasBasis`
machinery, e.g., `simp only [true_and]` or `simp only [forall_const]` can help with the case
`p = fun _ ↦ True`.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Set Filter
open scoped Classical
open Filter
section sort
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*}
/-- A filter basis `B` on a type `α` is a nonempty collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element
of the collection. -/
structure FilterBasis (α : Type*) where
/-- Sets of a filter basis. -/
sets : Set (Set α)
/-- The set of filter basis sets is nonempty. -/
nonempty : sets.Nonempty
/-- The set of filter basis sets is directed downwards. -/
inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → ∃ z ∈ sets, z ⊆ x ∩ y
#align filter_basis FilterBasis
instance FilterBasis.nonempty_sets (B : FilterBasis α) : Nonempty B.sets :=
B.nonempty.to_subtype
#align filter_basis.nonempty_sets FilterBasis.nonempty_sets
-- Porting note: this instance was reducible but it doesn't work the same way in Lean 4
/-- If `B` is a filter basis on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ B` as
on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*} : Membership (Set α) (FilterBasis α) :=
⟨fun U B => U ∈ B.sets⟩
@[simp] theorem FilterBasis.mem_sets {s : Set α} {B : FilterBasis α} : s ∈ B.sets ↔ s ∈ B := Iff.rfl
-- For illustration purposes, the filter basis defining `(atTop : Filter ℕ)`
instance : Inhabited (FilterBasis ℕ) :=
⟨{ sets := range Ici
nonempty := ⟨Ici 0, mem_range_self 0⟩
inter_sets := by
rintro _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact ⟨Ici (max n m), mem_range_self _, Ici_inter_Ici.symm.subset⟩ }⟩
/-- View a filter as a filter basis. -/
def Filter.asBasis (f : Filter α) : FilterBasis α :=
⟨f.sets, ⟨univ, univ_mem⟩, fun {x y} hx hy => ⟨x ∩ y, inter_mem hx hy, subset_rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.as_basis Filter.asBasis
-- Porting note: was `protected` in Lean 3 but `protected` didn't work; removed
/-- `is_basis p s` means the image of `s` bounded by `p` is a filter basis. -/
structure Filter.IsBasis (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → Set α) : Prop where
/-- There exists at least one `i` that satisfies `p`. -/
nonempty : ∃ i, p i
/-- `s` is directed downwards on `i` such that `p i`. -/
inter : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → ∃ k, p k ∧ s k ⊆ s i ∩ s j
#align filter.is_basis Filter.IsBasis
namespace Filter
namespace IsBasis
/-- Constructs a filter basis from an indexed family of sets satisfying `IsBasis`. -/
protected def filterBasis {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : IsBasis p s) : FilterBasis α where
sets := { t | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = t }
nonempty :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.nonempty
⟨s i, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩⟩
inter_sets := by
rintro _ _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
rcases h.inter hi hj with ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩, hk'⟩
#align filter.is_basis.filter_basis Filter.IsBasis.filterBasis
variable {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : IsBasis p s)
theorem mem_filterBasis_iff {U : Set α} : U ∈ h.filterBasis ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.is_basis.mem_filter_basis_iff Filter.IsBasis.mem_filterBasis_iff
end IsBasis
end Filter
namespace FilterBasis
/-- The filter associated to a filter basis. -/
protected def filter (B : FilterBasis α) : Filter α where
sets := { s | ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ s }
univ_sets := B.nonempty.imp fun s s_in => ⟨s_in, s.subset_univ⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨s, s_in, h⟩ hxy => ⟨s, s_in, Set.Subset.trans h hxy⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨_s, s_in, hs⟩ ⟨_t, t_in, ht⟩ =>
let ⟨u, u_in, u_sub⟩ := B.inter_sets s_in t_in
⟨u, u_in, u_sub.trans (inter_subset_inter hs ht)⟩
#align filter_basis.filter FilterBasis.filter
theorem mem_filter_iff (B : FilterBasis α) {U : Set α} : U ∈ B.filter ↔ ∃ s ∈ B, s ⊆ U :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter_basis.mem_filter_iff FilterBasis.mem_filter_iff
theorem mem_filter_of_mem (B : FilterBasis α) {U : Set α} : U ∈ B → U ∈ B.filter := fun U_in =>
⟨U, U_in, Subset.refl _⟩
#align filter_basis.mem_filter_of_mem FilterBasis.mem_filter_of_mem
theorem eq_iInf_principal (B : FilterBasis α) : B.filter = ⨅ s : B.sets, 𝓟 s := by
have : Directed (· ≥ ·) fun s : B.sets => 𝓟 (s : Set α) := by
rintro ⟨U, U_in⟩ ⟨V, V_in⟩
rcases B.inter_sets U_in V_in with ⟨W, W_in, W_sub⟩
use ⟨W, W_in⟩
simp only [ge_iff_le, le_principal_iff, mem_principal, Subtype.coe_mk]
exact subset_inter_iff.mp W_sub
ext U
simp [mem_filter_iff, mem_iInf_of_directed this]
#align filter_basis.eq_infi_principal FilterBasis.eq_iInf_principal
protected theorem generate (B : FilterBasis α) : generate B.sets = B.filter := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro U U_in
rcases B.mem_filter_iff.mp U_in with ⟨V, V_in, h⟩
exact GenerateSets.superset (GenerateSets.basic V_in) h
· rw [le_generate_iff]
apply mem_filter_of_mem
#align filter_basis.generate FilterBasis.generate
end FilterBasis
namespace Filter
namespace IsBasis
variable {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α}
/-- Constructs a filter from an indexed family of sets satisfying `IsBasis`. -/
protected def filter (h : IsBasis p s) : Filter α :=
h.filterBasis.filter
#align filter.is_basis.filter Filter.IsBasis.filter
protected theorem mem_filter_iff (h : IsBasis p s) {U : Set α} :
U ∈ h.filter ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ U := by
simp only [IsBasis.filter, FilterBasis.mem_filter_iff, mem_filterBasis_iff,
exists_exists_and_eq_and]
#align filter.is_basis.mem_filter_iff Filter.IsBasis.mem_filter_iff
theorem filter_eq_generate (h : IsBasis p s) : h.filter = generate { U | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U } := by
erw [h.filterBasis.generate]; rfl
#align filter.is_basis.filter_eq_generate Filter.IsBasis.filter_eq_generate
end IsBasis
-- Porting note: was `protected` in Lean 3 but `protected` didn't work; removed
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a basis `s : ι → Set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`. -/
structure HasBasis (l : Filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → Set α) : Prop where
/-- A set `t` belongs to a filter `l` iff it includes an element of the basis. -/
mem_iff' : ∀ t : Set α, t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ t
#align filter.has_basis Filter.HasBasis
section SameType
variable {l l' : Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} {i : ι} {p' : ι' → Prop}
{s' : ι' → Set α} {i' : ι'}
theorem hasBasis_generate (s : Set (Set α)) :
(generate s).HasBasis (fun t => Set.Finite t ∧ t ⊆ s) fun t => ⋂₀ t :=
⟨fun U => by simp only [mem_generate_iff, exists_prop, and_assoc, and_left_comm]⟩
#align filter.has_basis_generate Filter.hasBasis_generate
/-- The smallest filter basis containing a given collection of sets. -/
def FilterBasis.ofSets (s : Set (Set α)) : FilterBasis α where
sets := sInter '' { t | Set.Finite t ∧ t ⊆ s }
nonempty := ⟨univ, ∅, ⟨⟨finite_empty, empty_subset s⟩, sInter_empty⟩⟩
inter_sets := by
rintro _ _ ⟨a, ⟨fina, suba⟩, rfl⟩ ⟨b, ⟨finb, subb⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⋂₀ (a ∪ b), mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨fina.union finb, union_subset suba subb⟩,
(sInter_union _ _).subset⟩
#align filter.filter_basis.of_sets Filter.FilterBasis.ofSets
lemma FilterBasis.ofSets_sets (s : Set (Set α)) :
(FilterBasis.ofSets s).sets = sInter '' { t | Set.Finite t ∧ t ⊆ s } :=
rfl
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
/-- Definition of `HasBasis` unfolded with implicit set argument. -/
theorem HasBasis.mem_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) : t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ t :=
hl.mem_iff' t
#align filter.has_basis.mem_iff Filter.HasBasis.mem_iffₓ
theorem HasBasis.eq_of_same_basis (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p s) : l = l' := by
ext t
rw [hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff]
#align filter.has_basis.eq_of_same_basis Filter.HasBasis.eq_of_same_basis
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem hasBasis_iff : l.HasBasis p s ↔ ∀ t, t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis_iff Filter.hasBasis_iffₓ
theorem HasBasis.ex_mem (h : l.HasBasis p s) : ∃ i, p i :=
(h.mem_iff.mp univ_mem).imp fun _ => And.left
#align filter.has_basis.ex_mem Filter.HasBasis.ex_mem
protected theorem HasBasis.nonempty (h : l.HasBasis p s) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_exists h.ex_mem
#align filter.has_basis.nonempty Filter.HasBasis.nonempty
protected theorem IsBasis.hasBasis (h : IsBasis p s) : HasBasis h.filter p s :=
⟨fun t => by simp only [h.mem_filter_iff, exists_prop]⟩
#align filter.is_basis.has_basis Filter.IsBasis.hasBasis
protected theorem HasBasis.mem_of_superset (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hi : p i) (ht : s i ⊆ t) :
t ∈ l :=
hl.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, ht⟩
#align filter.has_basis.mem_of_superset Filter.HasBasis.mem_of_superset
theorem HasBasis.mem_of_mem (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hi : p i) : s i ∈ l :=
hl.mem_of_superset hi Subset.rfl
#align filter.has_basis.mem_of_mem Filter.HasBasis.mem_of_mem
/-- Index of a basis set such that `s i ⊆ t` as an element of `Subtype p`. -/
noncomputable def HasBasis.index (h : l.HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) (ht : t ∈ l) : { i : ι // p i } :=
⟨(h.mem_iff.1 ht).choose, (h.mem_iff.1 ht).choose_spec.1⟩
#align filter.has_basis.index Filter.HasBasis.index
theorem HasBasis.property_index (h : l.HasBasis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : p (h.index t ht) :=
(h.index t ht).2
#align filter.has_basis.property_index Filter.HasBasis.property_index
theorem HasBasis.set_index_mem (h : l.HasBasis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : s (h.index t ht) ∈ l :=
h.mem_of_mem <| h.property_index _
#align filter.has_basis.set_index_mem Filter.HasBasis.set_index_mem
theorem HasBasis.set_index_subset (h : l.HasBasis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : s (h.index t ht) ⊆ t :=
(h.mem_iff.1 ht).choose_spec.2
#align filter.has_basis.set_index_subset Filter.HasBasis.set_index_subset
theorem HasBasis.isBasis (h : l.HasBasis p s) : IsBasis p s where
nonempty := h.ex_mem
inter hi hj := by
simpa only [h.mem_iff] using inter_mem (h.mem_of_mem hi) (h.mem_of_mem hj)
#align filter.has_basis.is_basis Filter.HasBasis.isBasis
theorem HasBasis.filter_eq (h : l.HasBasis p s) : h.isBasis.filter = l := by
ext U
simp [h.mem_iff, IsBasis.mem_filter_iff]
#align filter.has_basis.filter_eq Filter.HasBasis.filter_eq
theorem HasBasis.eq_generate (h : l.HasBasis p s) : l = generate { U | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U } := by
rw [← h.isBasis.filter_eq_generate, h.filter_eq]
#align filter.has_basis.eq_generate Filter.HasBasis.eq_generate
theorem generate_eq_generate_inter (s : Set (Set α)) :
generate s = generate (sInter '' { t | Set.Finite t ∧ t ⊆ s }) := by
rw [← FilterBasis.ofSets_sets, FilterBasis.generate, ← (hasBasis_generate s).filter_eq]; rfl
#align filter.generate_eq_generate_inter Filter.generate_eq_generate_inter
theorem ofSets_filter_eq_generate (s : Set (Set α)) :
(FilterBasis.ofSets s).filter = generate s := by
rw [← (FilterBasis.ofSets s).generate, FilterBasis.ofSets_sets, ← generate_eq_generate_inter]
#align filter.of_sets_filter_eq_generate Filter.ofSets_filter_eq_generate
protected theorem _root_.FilterBasis.hasBasis (B : FilterBasis α) :
HasBasis B.filter (fun s : Set α => s ∈ B) id :=
⟨fun _ => B.mem_filter_iff⟩
#align filter_basis.has_basis FilterBasis.hasBasis
theorem HasBasis.to_hasBasis' (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → s' i' ∈ l) : l.HasBasis p' s' := by
refine ⟨fun t => ⟨fun ht => ?_, fun ⟨i', hi', ht⟩ => mem_of_superset (h' i' hi') ht⟩⟩
rcases hl.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨i, hi, ht⟩
rcases h i hi with ⟨i', hi', hs's⟩
exact ⟨i', hi', hs's.trans ht⟩
#align filter.has_basis.to_has_basis' Filter.HasBasis.to_hasBasis'
theorem HasBasis.to_hasBasis (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i') : l.HasBasis p' s' :=
hl.to_hasBasis' h fun i' hi' =>
let ⟨i, hi, hss'⟩ := h' i' hi'
hl.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, hss'⟩
#align filter.has_basis.to_has_basis Filter.HasBasis.to_hasBasis
protected lemma HasBasis.congr (hl : l.HasBasis p s) {p' s'} (hp : ∀ i, p i ↔ p' i)
(hs : ∀ i, p i → s i = s' i) : l.HasBasis p' s' :=
⟨fun t ↦ by simp only [hl.mem_iff, ← hp]; exact exists_congr fun i ↦
and_congr_right fun hi ↦ hs i hi ▸ Iff.rfl⟩
theorem HasBasis.to_subset (hl : l.HasBasis p s) {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, p i → t i ⊆ s i)
(ht : ∀ i, p i → t i ∈ l) : l.HasBasis p t :=
hl.to_hasBasis' (fun i hi => ⟨i, hi, h i hi⟩) ht
#align filter.has_basis.to_subset Filter.HasBasis.to_subset
theorem HasBasis.eventually_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, q x) ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s i → q x := by simpa using hl.mem_iff
#align filter.has_basis.eventually_iff Filter.HasBasis.eventually_iff
theorem HasBasis.frequently_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, q x) ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ x ∈ s i, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, hl.eventually_iff]; push_neg; rfl
#align filter.has_basis.frequently_iff Filter.HasBasis.frequently_iff
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem HasBasis.exists_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) {P : Set α → Prop}
(mono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → P t → P s) : (∃ s ∈ l, P s) ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ P (s i) :=
⟨fun ⟨_s, hs, hP⟩ =>
let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := hl.mem_iff.1 hs
⟨i, hi, mono his hP⟩,
fun ⟨i, hi, hP⟩ => ⟨s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, hP⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis.exists_iff Filter.HasBasis.exists_iffₓ
theorem HasBasis.forall_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) {P : Set α → Prop}
(mono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) : (∀ s ∈ l, P s) ↔ ∀ i, p i → P (s i) :=
⟨fun H i hi => H (s i) <| hl.mem_of_mem hi, fun H _s hs =>
let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := hl.mem_iff.1 hs
mono his (H i hi)⟩
#align filter.has_basis.forall_iff Filter.HasBasis.forall_iff
protected theorem HasBasis.neBot_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) :
NeBot l ↔ ∀ {i}, p i → (s i).Nonempty :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.symm.trans <| hl.forall_iff fun _ _ => Nonempty.mono
#align filter.has_basis.ne_bot_iff Filter.HasBasis.neBot_iff
theorem HasBasis.eq_bot_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) : l = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| neBot_iff.symm.trans <|
hl.neBot_iff.trans <| by simp only [not_exists, not_and, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align filter.has_basis.eq_bot_iff Filter.HasBasis.eq_bot_iff
theorem generate_neBot_iff {s : Set (Set α)} :
NeBot (generate s) ↔ ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Finite → (⋂₀ t).Nonempty :=
(hasBasis_generate s).neBot_iff.trans <| by simp only [← and_imp, and_comm]
#align filter.generate_ne_bot_iff Filter.generate_neBot_iff
theorem basis_sets (l : Filter α) : l.HasBasis (fun s : Set α => s ∈ l) id :=
⟨fun _ => exists_mem_subset_iff.symm⟩
#align filter.basis_sets Filter.basis_sets
theorem asBasis_filter (f : Filter α) : f.asBasis.filter = f :=
Filter.ext fun _ => exists_mem_subset_iff
#align filter.as_basis_filter Filter.asBasis_filter
theorem hasBasis_self {l : Filter α} {P : Set α → Prop} :
HasBasis l (fun s => s ∈ l ∧ P s) id ↔ ∀ t ∈ l, ∃ r ∈ l, P r ∧ r ⊆ t := by
simp only [hasBasis_iff, id, and_assoc]
exact forall_congr' fun s =>
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h, fun ⟨t, hl, _, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset hl hts⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis_self Filter.hasBasis_self
theorem HasBasis.comp_surjective (h : l.HasBasis p s) {g : ι' → ι} (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
l.HasBasis (p ∘ g) (s ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _ => h.mem_iff.trans hg.exists⟩
#align filter.has_basis.comp_surjective Filter.HasBasis.comp_surjective
theorem HasBasis.comp_equiv (h : l.HasBasis p s) (e : ι' ≃ ι) : l.HasBasis (p ∘ e) (s ∘ e) :=
h.comp_surjective e.surjective
#align filter.has_basis.comp_equiv Filter.HasBasis.comp_equiv
theorem HasBasis.to_image_id' (h : l.HasBasis p s) : l.HasBasis (fun t ↦ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = t) id :=
⟨fun _ ↦ by simp [h.mem_iff]⟩
theorem HasBasis.to_image_id {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : l.HasBasis p s) :
l.HasBasis (· ∈ s '' {i | p i}) id :=
h.to_image_id'
/-- If `{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l` and each `s i` includes `s j` such that
`p j ∧ q j`, then `{s j | p j ∧ q j}` is a basis of `l`. -/
theorem HasBasis.restrict (h : l.HasBasis p s) {q : ι → Prop}
(hq : ∀ i, p i → ∃ j, p j ∧ q j ∧ s j ⊆ s i) : l.HasBasis (fun i => p i ∧ q i) s := by
refine ⟨fun t => ⟨fun ht => ?_, fun ⟨i, hpi, hti⟩ => h.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, hpi.1, hti⟩⟩⟩
rcases h.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨i, hpi, hti⟩
rcases hq i hpi with ⟨j, hpj, hqj, hji⟩
exact ⟨j, ⟨hpj, hqj⟩, hji.trans hti⟩
#align filter.has_basis.restrict Filter.HasBasis.restrict
/-- If `{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l` and `V ∈ l`, then `{s i | p i ∧ s i ⊆ V}`
is a basis of `l`. -/
theorem HasBasis.restrict_subset (h : l.HasBasis p s) {V : Set α} (hV : V ∈ l) :
l.HasBasis (fun i => p i ∧ s i ⊆ V) s :=
h.restrict fun _i hi => (h.mem_iff.1 (inter_mem hV (h.mem_of_mem hi))).imp fun _j hj =>
⟨hj.1, subset_inter_iff.1 hj.2⟩
#align filter.has_basis.restrict_subset Filter.HasBasis.restrict_subset
theorem HasBasis.hasBasis_self_subset {p : Set α → Prop} (h : l.HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ l ∧ p s) id)
{V : Set α} (hV : V ∈ l) : l.HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ l ∧ p s ∧ s ⊆ V) id := by
simpa only [and_assoc] using h.restrict_subset hV
#align filter.has_basis.has_basis_self_subset Filter.HasBasis.hasBasis_self_subset
theorem HasBasis.ge_iff (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → s' i' ∈ l :=
⟨fun h _i' hi' => h <| hl'.mem_of_mem hi', fun h _s hs =>
let ⟨_i', hi', hs⟩ := hl'.mem_iff.1 hs
mem_of_superset (h _ hi') hs⟩
#align filter.has_basis.ge_iff Filter.HasBasis.ge_iff
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem HasBasis.le_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ t ∈ l', ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_def, hl.mem_iff]
#align filter.has_basis.le_iff Filter.HasBasis.le_iffₓ
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem HasBasis.le_basis_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') :
l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i' := by
simp only [hl'.ge_iff, hl.mem_iff]
#align filter.has_basis.le_basis_iff Filter.HasBasis.le_basis_iffₓ
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem HasBasis.ext (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s')
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i) (h' : ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i') :
l = l' := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [hl.le_basis_iff hl']
simpa using h'
· rw [hl'.le_basis_iff hl]
simpa using h
#align filter.has_basis.ext Filter.HasBasis.extₓ
theorem HasBasis.inf' (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') :
(l ⊓ l').HasBasis (fun i : PProd ι ι' => p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) fun i => s i.1 ∩ s' i.2 :=
⟨by
intro t
constructor
· simp only [mem_inf_iff, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff]
rintro ⟨t, ⟨i, hi, ht⟩, t', ⟨i', hi', ht'⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨i, i'⟩, ⟨hi, hi'⟩, inter_subset_inter ht ht'⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨i, i'⟩, ⟨hi, hi'⟩, H⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (hl.mem_of_mem hi) (hl'.mem_of_mem hi') H⟩
#align filter.has_basis.inf' Filter.HasBasis.inf'
theorem HasBasis.inf {ι ι' : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {p' : ι' → Prop}
{s' : ι' → Set α} (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') :
(l ⊓ l').HasBasis (fun i : ι × ι' => p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) fun i => s i.1 ∩ s' i.2 :=
(hl.inf' hl').comp_equiv Equiv.pprodEquivProd.symm
#align filter.has_basis.inf Filter.HasBasis.inf
theorem hasBasis_iInf' {ι : Type*} {ι' : ι → Type*} {l : ι → Filter α} {p : ∀ i, ι' i → Prop}
{s : ∀ i, ι' i → Set α} (hl : ∀ i, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i)) :
(⨅ i, l i).HasBasis (fun If : Set ι × ∀ i, ι' i => If.1.Finite ∧ ∀ i ∈ If.1, p i (If.2 i))
fun If : Set ι × ∀ i, ι' i => ⋂ i ∈ If.1, s i (If.2 i) :=
⟨by
intro t
constructor
· simp only [mem_iInf', (hl _).mem_iff]
rintro ⟨I, hI, V, hV, -, rfl, -⟩
choose u hu using hV
exact ⟨⟨I, u⟩, ⟨hI, fun i _ => (hu i).1⟩, iInter₂_mono fun i _ => (hu i).2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨I, f⟩, ⟨hI₁, hI₂⟩, hsub⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ hsub
exact (biInter_mem hI₁).mpr fun i hi => mem_iInf_of_mem i <| (hl i).mem_of_mem <| hI₂ _ hi⟩
#align filter.has_basis_infi' Filter.hasBasis_iInf'
theorem hasBasis_iInf {ι : Type*} {ι' : ι → Type*} {l : ι → Filter α} {p : ∀ i, ι' i → Prop}
{s : ∀ i, ι' i → Set α} (hl : ∀ i, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i)) :
(⨅ i, l i).HasBasis
(fun If : Σ I : Set ι, ∀ i : I, ι' i => If.1.Finite ∧ ∀ i : If.1, p i (If.2 i)) fun If =>
⋂ i : If.1, s i (If.2 i) := by
refine ⟨fun t => ⟨fun ht => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rcases (hasBasis_iInf' hl).mem_iff.mp ht with ⟨⟨I, f⟩, ⟨hI, hf⟩, hsub⟩
exact ⟨⟨I, fun i => f i⟩, ⟨hI, Subtype.forall.mpr hf⟩, trans (iInter_subtype _ _) hsub⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨I, f⟩, ⟨hI, hf⟩, hsub⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ hsub
cases hI.nonempty_fintype
exact iInter_mem.2 fun i => mem_iInf_of_mem ↑i <| (hl i).mem_of_mem <| hf _
#align filter.has_basis_infi Filter.hasBasis_iInf
theorem hasBasis_iInf_of_directed' {ι : Type*} {ι' : ι → Sort _} [Nonempty ι] {l : ι → Filter α}
(s : ∀ i, ι' i → Set α) (p : ∀ i, ι' i → Prop) (hl : ∀ i, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i))
(h : Directed (· ≥ ·) l) :
(⨅ i, l i).HasBasis (fun ii' : Σi, ι' i => p ii'.1 ii'.2) fun ii' => s ii'.1 ii'.2 := by
refine ⟨fun t => ?_⟩
rw [mem_iInf_of_directed h, Sigma.exists]
exact exists_congr fun i => (hl i).mem_iff
#align filter.has_basis_infi_of_directed' Filter.hasBasis_iInf_of_directed'
theorem hasBasis_iInf_of_directed {ι : Type*} {ι' : Sort _} [Nonempty ι] {l : ι → Filter α}
(s : ι → ι' → Set α) (p : ι → ι' → Prop) (hl : ∀ i, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i))
(h : Directed (· ≥ ·) l) :
(⨅ i, l i).HasBasis (fun ii' : ι × ι' => p ii'.1 ii'.2) fun ii' => s ii'.1 ii'.2 := by
refine ⟨fun t => ?_⟩
rw [mem_iInf_of_directed h, Prod.exists]
exact exists_congr fun i => (hl i).mem_iff
#align filter.has_basis_infi_of_directed Filter.hasBasis_iInf_of_directed
theorem hasBasis_biInf_of_directed' {ι : Type*} {ι' : ι → Sort _} {dom : Set ι}
(hdom : dom.Nonempty) {l : ι → Filter α} (s : ∀ i, ι' i → Set α) (p : ∀ i, ι' i → Prop)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ dom, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i)) (h : DirectedOn (l ⁻¹'o GE.ge) dom) :
(⨅ i ∈ dom, l i).HasBasis (fun ii' : Σi, ι' i => ii'.1 ∈ dom ∧ p ii'.1 ii'.2) fun ii' =>
s ii'.1 ii'.2 := by
refine ⟨fun t => ?_⟩
rw [mem_biInf_of_directed h hdom, Sigma.exists]
refine exists_congr fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨hi, hti⟩
rcases (hl i hi).mem_iff.mp hti with ⟨b, hb, hbt⟩
exact ⟨b, ⟨hi, hb⟩, hbt⟩
· rintro ⟨b, ⟨hi, hb⟩, hibt⟩
exact ⟨hi, (hl i hi).mem_iff.mpr ⟨b, hb, hibt⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis_binfi_of_directed' Filter.hasBasis_biInf_of_directed'
theorem hasBasis_biInf_of_directed {ι : Type*} {ι' : Sort _} {dom : Set ι} (hdom : dom.Nonempty)
{l : ι → Filter α} (s : ι → ι' → Set α) (p : ι → ι' → Prop)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ dom, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i)) (h : DirectedOn (l ⁻¹'o GE.ge) dom) :
(⨅ i ∈ dom, l i).HasBasis (fun ii' : ι × ι' => ii'.1 ∈ dom ∧ p ii'.1 ii'.2) fun ii' =>
s ii'.1 ii'.2 := by
refine ⟨fun t => ?_⟩
rw [mem_biInf_of_directed h hdom, Prod.exists]
refine exists_congr fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨hi, hti⟩
rcases (hl i hi).mem_iff.mp hti with ⟨b, hb, hbt⟩
exact ⟨b, ⟨hi, hb⟩, hbt⟩
· rintro ⟨b, ⟨hi, hb⟩, hibt⟩
exact ⟨hi, (hl i hi).mem_iff.mpr ⟨b, hb, hibt⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis_binfi_of_directed Filter.hasBasis_biInf_of_directed
theorem hasBasis_principal (t : Set α) : (𝓟 t).HasBasis (fun _ : Unit => True) fun _ => t :=
⟨fun U => by simp⟩
#align filter.has_basis_principal Filter.hasBasis_principal
theorem hasBasis_pure (x : α) :
(pure x : Filter α).HasBasis (fun _ : Unit => True) fun _ => {x} := by
simp only [← principal_singleton, hasBasis_principal]
#align filter.has_basis_pure Filter.hasBasis_pure
theorem HasBasis.sup' (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') :
(l ⊔ l').HasBasis (fun i : PProd ι ι' => p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) fun i => s i.1 ∪ s' i.2 :=
⟨by
intro t
simp_rw [mem_sup, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff, PProd.exists, union_subset_iff,
← exists_and_right, ← exists_and_left]
simp only [and_assoc, and_left_comm]⟩
#align filter.has_basis.sup' Filter.HasBasis.sup'
theorem HasBasis.sup {ι ι' : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {p' : ι' → Prop}
{s' : ι' → Set α} (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') :
(l ⊔ l').HasBasis (fun i : ι × ι' => p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) fun i => s i.1 ∪ s' i.2 :=
(hl.sup' hl').comp_equiv Equiv.pprodEquivProd.symm
#align filter.has_basis.sup Filter.HasBasis.sup
theorem hasBasis_iSup {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Type*} {l : ι → Filter α} {p : ∀ i, ι' i → Prop}
{s : ∀ i, ι' i → Set α} (hl : ∀ i, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i)) :
(⨆ i, l i).HasBasis (fun f : ∀ i, ι' i => ∀ i, p i (f i)) fun f : ∀ i, ι' i => ⋃ i, s i (f i) :=
hasBasis_iff.mpr fun t => by
simp only [hasBasis_iff, (hl _).mem_iff, Classical.skolem, forall_and, iUnion_subset_iff,
mem_iSup]
#align filter.has_basis_supr Filter.hasBasis_iSup
theorem HasBasis.sup_principal (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) :
(l ⊔ 𝓟 t).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∪ t :=
⟨fun u => by
simp only [(hl.sup' (hasBasis_principal t)).mem_iff, PProd.exists, exists_prop, and_true_iff,
Unique.exists_iff]⟩
#align filter.has_basis.sup_principal Filter.HasBasis.sup_principal
theorem HasBasis.sup_pure (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (x : α) :
(l ⊔ pure x).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∪ {x} := by
simp only [← principal_singleton, hl.sup_principal]
#align filter.has_basis.sup_pure Filter.HasBasis.sup_pure
theorem HasBasis.inf_principal (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (s' : Set α) :
(l ⊓ 𝓟 s').HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ s' :=
⟨fun t => by
simp only [mem_inf_principal, hl.mem_iff, subset_def, mem_setOf_eq, mem_inter_iff, and_imp]⟩
#align filter.has_basis.inf_principal Filter.HasBasis.inf_principal
theorem HasBasis.principal_inf (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (s' : Set α) :
(𝓟 s' ⊓ l).HasBasis p fun i => s' ∩ s i := by
simpa only [inf_comm, inter_comm] using hl.inf_principal s'
#align filter.has_basis.principal_inf Filter.HasBasis.principal_inf
theorem HasBasis.inf_basis_neBot_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') :
NeBot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, p i → ∀ ⦃i'⦄, p' i' → (s i ∩ s' i').Nonempty :=
(hl.inf' hl').neBot_iff.trans <| by simp [@forall_swap _ ι']
#align filter.has_basis.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff Filter.HasBasis.inf_basis_neBot_iff
theorem HasBasis.inf_neBot_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) :
NeBot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, p i → ∀ ⦃s'⦄, s' ∈ l' → (s i ∩ s').Nonempty :=
hl.inf_basis_neBot_iff l'.basis_sets
#align filter.has_basis.inf_ne_bot_iff Filter.HasBasis.inf_neBot_iff
theorem HasBasis.inf_principal_neBot_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) {t : Set α} :
NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 t) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, p i → (s i ∩ t).Nonempty :=
(hl.inf_principal t).neBot_iff
#align filter.has_basis.inf_principal_ne_bot_iff Filter.HasBasis.inf_principal_neBot_iff
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem HasBasis.disjoint_iff (hl : l.HasBasis p s) (hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') :
Disjoint l l' ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∃ i', p' i' ∧ Disjoint (s i) (s' i') :=
not_iff_not.mp <| by simp only [_root_.disjoint_iff, ← Ne.eq_def, ← neBot_iff, inf_eq_inter,
hl.inf_basis_neBot_iff hl', not_exists, not_and, bot_eq_empty, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align filter.has_basis.disjoint_iff Filter.HasBasis.disjoint_iffₓ
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem _root_.Disjoint.exists_mem_filter_basis (h : Disjoint l l') (hl : l.HasBasis p s)
(hl' : l'.HasBasis p' s') : ∃ i, p i ∧ ∃ i', p' i' ∧ Disjoint (s i) (s' i') :=
(hl.disjoint_iff hl').1 h
#align disjoint.exists_mem_filter_basis Disjoint.exists_mem_filter_basisₓ
theorem _root_.Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_basis_of_disjoint {I} [Finite I] {l : I → Filter α}
{ι : I → Sort*} {p : ∀ i, ι i → Prop} {s : ∀ i, ι i → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on l))
(h : ∀ i, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i)) :
∃ ind : ∀ i, ι i, (∀ i, p i (ind i)) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on fun i => s i (ind i)) := by
rcases hd.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint with ⟨t, htl, hd⟩
choose ind hp ht using fun i => (h i).mem_iff.1 (htl i)
exact ⟨ind, hp, hd.mono fun i j hij => hij.mono (ht _) (ht _)⟩
#align pairwise.exists_mem_filter_basis_of_disjoint Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_basis_of_disjoint
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter_basis {I : Type*} {l : I → Filter α}
{ι : I → Sort*} {p : ∀ i, ι i → Prop} {s : ∀ i, ι i → Set α} {S : Set I}
(hd : S.PairwiseDisjoint l) (hS : S.Finite) (h : ∀ i, (l i).HasBasis (p i) (s i)) :
∃ ind : ∀ i, ι i, (∀ i, p i (ind i)) ∧ S.PairwiseDisjoint fun i => s i (ind i) := by
rcases hd.exists_mem_filter hS with ⟨t, htl, hd⟩
choose ind hp ht using fun i => (h i).mem_iff.1 (htl i)
exact ⟨ind, hp, hd.mono ht⟩
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.exists_mem_filter_basis Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter_basis
theorem inf_neBot_iff :
NeBot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, s ∈ l → ∀ ⦃s'⦄, s' ∈ l' → (s ∩ s').Nonempty :=
l.basis_sets.inf_neBot_iff
#align filter.inf_ne_bot_iff Filter.inf_neBot_iff
theorem inf_principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ U ∈ l, (U ∩ s).Nonempty :=
l.basis_sets.inf_principal_neBot_iff
#align filter.inf_principal_ne_bot_iff Filter.inf_principal_neBot_iff
theorem mem_iff_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ↔ f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥ := by
refine not_iff_not.1 ((inf_principal_neBot_iff.trans ?_).symm.trans neBot_iff)
exact
⟨fun h hs => by simpa [Set.not_nonempty_empty] using h s hs, fun hs t ht =>
inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 fun hts => hs <| mem_of_superset ht hts⟩
#align filter.mem_iff_inf_principal_compl Filter.mem_iff_inf_principal_compl
theorem not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∉ f ↔ NeBot (f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ) :=
(not_congr mem_iff_inf_principal_compl).trans neBot_iff.symm
#align filter.not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl Filter.not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_principal_right {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : Disjoint f (𝓟 s) ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, disjoint_iff]
#align filter.disjoint_principal_right Filter.disjoint_principal_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_principal_left {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : Disjoint (𝓟 s) f ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_principal_right]
#align filter.disjoint_principal_left Filter.disjoint_principal_left
@[simp 1100] -- Porting note: higher priority for linter
theorem disjoint_principal_principal {s t : Set α} : Disjoint (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_principal_left, mem_principal]
#align filter.disjoint_principal_principal Filter.disjoint_principal_principal
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.filter_principal⟩ := disjoint_principal_principal
#align disjoint.filter_principal Disjoint.filter_principal
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_pure_pure {x y : α} : Disjoint (pure x : Filter α) (pure y) ↔ x ≠ y := by
simp only [← principal_singleton, disjoint_principal_principal, disjoint_singleton]
#align filter.disjoint_pure_pure Filter.disjoint_pure_pure
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
#align filter.compl_diagonal_mem_prod Filter.compl_diagonal_mem_prod
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem HasBasis.disjoint_iff_left (h : l.HasBasis p s) :
Disjoint l l' ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ (s i)ᶜ ∈ l' := by
simp only [h.disjoint_iff l'.basis_sets, id, ← disjoint_principal_left,
(hasBasis_principal _).disjoint_iff l'.basis_sets, true_and, Unique.exists_iff]
#align filter.has_basis.disjoint_iff_left Filter.HasBasis.disjoint_iff_leftₓ
-- Porting note: use `∃ i, p i ∧ _` instead of `∃ i (hi : p i), _`.
theorem HasBasis.disjoint_iff_right (h : l.HasBasis p s) :
Disjoint l' l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ (s i)ᶜ ∈ l' :=
disjoint_comm.trans h.disjoint_iff_left
#align filter.has_basis.disjoint_iff_right Filter.HasBasis.disjoint_iff_rightₓ
theorem le_iff_forall_inf_principal_compl {f g : Filter α} : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ V ∈ g, f ⊓ 𝓟 Vᶜ = ⊥ :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => mem_iff_inf_principal_compl
#align filter.le_iff_forall_inf_principal_compl Filter.le_iff_forall_inf_principal_compl
theorem inf_neBot_iff_frequently_left {f g : Filter α} :
NeBot (f ⊓ g) ↔ ∀ {p : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [inf_neBot_iff, frequently_iff, and_comm]; rfl
#align filter.inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left Filter.inf_neBot_iff_frequently_left
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Bases.lean | 760 | 763 | theorem inf_neBot_iff_frequently_right {f g : Filter α} :
NeBot (f ⊓ g) ↔ ∀ {p : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in g, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by |
rw [inf_comm]
exact inf_neBot_iff_frequently_left
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
#align_import algebra.ring.units from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2ed7e4aec72395b6a7c3ac4ac7873a7a43ead17c"
/-!
# Units in semirings and rings
-/
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {R : Type x}
open Function
namespace Units
section HasDistribNeg
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α}
/-- Each element of the group of units of a ring has an additive inverse. -/
instance : Neg αˣ :=
⟨fun u => ⟨-↑u, -↑u⁻¹, by simp, by simp⟩⟩
/-- Representing an element of a ring's unit group as an element of the ring commutes with
mapping this element to its additive inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem val_neg (u : αˣ) : (↑(-u) : α) = -u :=
rfl
#align units.coe_neg Units.val_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_neg_one : ((-1 : αˣ) : α) = -1 :=
rfl
#align units.coe_neg_one Units.coe_neg_one
instance : HasDistribNeg αˣ :=
Units.ext.hasDistribNeg _ Units.val_neg Units.val_mul
@[field_simps]
theorem neg_divp (a : α) (u : αˣ) : -(a /ₚ u) = -a /ₚ u := by simp only [divp, neg_mul]
#align units.neg_divp Units.neg_divp
end HasDistribNeg
section Ring
variable [Ring α] {a b : α}
-- Needs to have higher simp priority than divp_add_divp. 1000 is the default priority.
@[field_simps 1010]
theorem divp_add_divp_same (a b : α) (u : αˣ) : a /ₚ u + b /ₚ u = (a + b) /ₚ u := by
simp only [divp, add_mul]
#align units.divp_add_divp_same Units.divp_add_divp_same
-- Needs to have higher simp priority than divp_sub_divp. 1000 is the default priority.
@[field_simps 1010]
theorem divp_sub_divp_same (a b : α) (u : αˣ) : a /ₚ u - b /ₚ u = (a - b) /ₚ u := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_divp, divp_add_divp_same]
#align units.divp_sub_divp_same Units.divp_sub_divp_same
@[field_simps]
theorem add_divp (a b : α) (u : αˣ) : a + b /ₚ u = (a * u + b) /ₚ u := by
simp only [divp, add_mul, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]
#align units.add_divp Units.add_divp
@[field_simps]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Units.lean | 77 | 78 | theorem sub_divp (a b : α) (u : αˣ) : a - b /ₚ u = (a * u - b) /ₚ u := by |
simp only [divp, sub_mul, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
#align_import topology.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs products, sums, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, sum, disjoint union, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance instTopologicalSpaceSubtype {p : X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Subtype p) :=
induced (↑) t
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceProd [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X × Y) :=
induced Prod.fst t₁ ⊓ induced Prod.snd t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSum [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
coinduced Sum.inl t₁ ⊔ coinduced Sum.inr t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
#align Pi.topological_space Pi.topologicalSpace
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
#align ulift.topological_space ULift.topologicalSpace
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_mul continuous_ofMul
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_mul continuous_toMul
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_add continuous_ofAdd
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_add continuous_toAdd
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_mul isOpenMap_ofMul
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_mul isOpenMap_toMul
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_add isOpenMap_ofAdd
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_add isOpenMap_toAdd
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_mul isClosedMap_ofMul
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_mul isClosedMap_toMul
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_add isClosedMap_ofAdd
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_add isClosedMap_toAdd
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_mul nhds_ofMul
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_add nhds_ofAdd
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 (toMul x) = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_mul nhds_toMul
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 (toAdd x) = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_add nhds_toAdd
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_dual continuous_toDual
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_dual continuous_ofDual
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_dual isOpenMap_toDual
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_dual isOpenMap_ofDual
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_dual isClosedMap_toDual
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_dual isClosedMap_ofDual
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_dual nhds_toDual
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_dual nhds_ofDual
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
#align quotient.preimage_mem_nhds Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
#align dense.quotient Dense.quotient
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
#align dense_range.quotient DenseRange.quotient
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
#align sum.discrete_topology Sum.discreteTopology
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
#align sigma.discrete_topology Sigma.discreteTopology
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
#align mem_nhds_subtype mem_nhds_subtype
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
#align nhds_subtype nhds_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
#align nhds_within_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_ne_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align discrete_topology_subtype_iff discreteTopology_subtype_iff
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
#align cofinite_topology CofiniteTopology
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
#align cofinite_topology.of CofiniteTopology.of
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff' CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff'
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
#align cofinite_topology.is_closed_iff CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
#align cofinite_topology.nhds_eq CofiniteTopology.nhds_eq
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
#align cofinite_topology.mem_nhds_iff CofiniteTopology.mem_nhds_iff
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
[TopologicalSpace ε] [TopologicalSpace ζ]
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean 4 fails to deduce implicit args
@[simp] theorem continuous_prod_mk {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} :
(Continuous fun x => (f x, g x)) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
(@continuous_inf_rng X (Y × Z) _ _ (TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _)).trans <|
continuous_induced_rng.and continuous_induced_rng
#align continuous_prod_mk continuous_prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_fst : Continuous (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).1
#align continuous_fst continuous_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.fst {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).1 :=
continuous_fst.comp hf
#align continuous.fst Continuous.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.fst' {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.fst :=
hf.comp continuous_fst
#align continuous.fst' Continuous.fst'
theorem continuousAt_fst {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.fst p :=
continuous_fst.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_fst continuousAt_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.fst {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).1) x :=
continuousAt_fst.comp hf
#align continuous_at.fst ContinuousAt.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst' {f : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst' ContinuousAt.fst'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst'' {f : X → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.fst) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst'' ContinuousAt.fst''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).1) l (𝓝 <| p.1) :=
continuousAt_fst.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_snd : Continuous (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).2
#align continuous_snd continuous_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.snd {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).2 :=
continuous_snd.comp hf
#align continuous.snd Continuous.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.snd' {f : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.snd :=
hf.comp continuous_snd
#align continuous.snd' Continuous.snd'
theorem continuousAt_snd {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.snd p :=
continuous_snd.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_snd continuousAt_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.snd {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).2) x :=
continuousAt_snd.comp hf
#align continuous_at.snd ContinuousAt.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd' {f : Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd' ContinuousAt.snd'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd'' {f : Y → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.snd) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd'' ContinuousAt.snd''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).2) l (𝓝 <| p.2) :=
continuousAt_snd.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.prod_mk {f : Z → X} {g : Z → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => (f x, g x) :=
continuous_prod_mk.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.prod_mk Continuous.prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk (x : X) : Continuous fun y : Y => (x, y) :=
continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align continuous.prod.mk Continuous.Prod.mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk_left (y : Y) : Continuous fun x : X => (x, y) :=
continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const
#align continuous.prod.mk_left Continuous.Prod.mk_left
/-- If `f x y` is continuous in `x` for all `y ∈ s`,
then the set of `x` such that `f x` maps `s` to `t` is closed. -/
lemma IsClosed.setOf_mapsTo {α : Type*} {f : X → α → Z} {s : Set α} {t : Set Z} (ht : IsClosed t)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Continuous (f · a)) : IsClosed {x | MapsTo (f x) s t} := by
simpa only [MapsTo, setOf_forall] using isClosed_biInter fun y hy ↦ ht.preimage (hf y hy)
theorem Continuous.comp₂ {g : X × Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w) :=
hg.comp <| he.prod_mk hf
#align continuous.comp₂ Continuous.comp₂
theorem Continuous.comp₃ {g : X × Y × Z → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) :
Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w) :=
hg.comp₂ he <| hf.prod_mk hk
#align continuous.comp₃ Continuous.comp₃
theorem Continuous.comp₄ {g : X × Y × Z × ζ → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) {l : W → ζ}
(hl : Continuous l) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w, l w) :=
hg.comp₃ he hf <| hk.prod_mk hl
#align continuous.comp₄ Continuous.comp₄
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.prod_map {f : Z → X} {g : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun p : Z × W => (f p.1, g p.2) :=
hf.fst'.prod_mk hg.snd'
#align continuous.prod_map Continuous.prod_map
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_left₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta1; haveI := tb1; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta1 tb1 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_left₂ continuous_inf_dom_left₂
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_right₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta2; haveI := tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta2 tb2 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_right₂ continuous_inf_dom_right₂
/-- A version of `continuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_sInf_dom₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {tas : Set (TopologicalSpace X)}
{tbs : Set (TopologicalSpace Y)} {tX : TopologicalSpace X} {tY : TopologicalSpace Y}
{tc : TopologicalSpace Z} (hX : tX ∈ tas) (hY : tY ∈ tbs)
(hf : Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf tas; haveI := sInf tbs;
exact @Continuous _ _ _ tc fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have hX := continuous_sInf_dom hX continuous_id
have hY := continuous_sInf_dom hY continuous_id
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ tX tY (sInf tas) (sInf tbs) _ _ hX hY
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_continuous_id
#align continuous_Inf_dom₂ continuous_sInf_dom₂
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds {p : X → Prop} {x : X} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (y : Y) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).1 :=
continuousAt_fst h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds {p : Y → Prop} {y : Y} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) (x : X) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).2 :=
continuousAt_snd h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds {px : X → Prop} {x} (hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, px x) {py : Y → Prop}
{y} (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, py y) : ∀ᶠ p in 𝓝 (x, y), px (p : X × Y).1 ∧ py p.2 :=
(hx.prod_inl_nhds y).and (hy.prod_inr_nhds x)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds
theorem continuous_swap : Continuous (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) :=
continuous_snd.prod_mk continuous_fst
#align continuous_swap continuous_swap
lemma isClosedMap_swap : IsClosedMap (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) := fun s hs ↦ by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
exact hs.preimage continuous_swap
theorem Continuous.uncurry_left {f : X → Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous (f x) :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk _)
#align continuous_uncurry_left Continuous.uncurry_left
theorem Continuous.uncurry_right {f : X → Y → Z} (y : Y) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous fun a => f a y :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk_left _)
#align continuous_uncurry_right Continuous.uncurry_right
-- 2024-03-09
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_left := Continuous.uncurry_left
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_right := Continuous.uncurry_right
theorem continuous_curry {g : X × Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous g) : Continuous (curry g x) :=
Continuous.uncurry_left x h
#align continuous_curry continuous_curry
theorem IsOpen.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).inter (ht.preimage continuous_snd)
#align is_open.prod IsOpen.prod
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean fails to find `t₁` and `t₂` by unification
theorem nhds_prod_eq {x : X} {y : Y} : 𝓝 (x, y) = 𝓝 x ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, instTopologicalSpaceProd, nhds_inf (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _), nhds_induced, nhds_induced]
#align nhds_prod_eq nhds_prod_eq
-- Porting note: moved from `Topology.ContinuousOn`
theorem nhdsWithin_prod_eq (x : X) (y : Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (x, y) = 𝓝[s] x ×ˢ 𝓝[t] y := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
#align nhds_within_prod_eq nhdsWithin_prod_eq
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝 y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff mem_nhds_prod_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} {tx : Set X} {ty : Set Y} :
s ∈ 𝓝[tx ×ˢ ty] (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[tx] x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝[ty] y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds {ιX ιY : Type*} {px : ιX → Prop} {py : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : (𝓝 x).HasBasis px sx)
(hy : (𝓝 y).HasBasis py sy) :
(𝓝 (x, y)).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => px i.1 ∧ py i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact hx.prod hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds' {ιX ιY : Type*} {pX : ιX → Prop} {pY : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {p : X × Y} (hx : (𝓝 p.1).HasBasis pX sx)
(hy : (𝓝 p.2).HasBasis pY sy) :
(𝓝 p).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => pX i.1 ∧ pY i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 :=
hx.prod_nhds hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds' Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds'
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff' {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).prod_nhds (nhds_basis_opens y)).mem_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Prod.exists, and_comm, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff' mem_nhds_prod_iff'
theorem Prod.tendsto_iff {X} (seq : X → Y × Z) {f : Filter X} (p : Y × Z) :
Tendsto seq f (𝓝 p) ↔
Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).fst) f (𝓝 p.fst) ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).snd) f (𝓝 p.snd) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.tendsto_prod_iff']
#align prod.tendsto_iff Prod.tendsto_iff
instance [DiscreteTopology X] [DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X × Y) :=
discreteTopology_iff_nhds.2 fun (a, b) => by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete X, nhds_discrete Y, prod_pure_pure]
theorem prod_mem_nhds_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 y := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, prod_mem_prod_iff]
#align prod_mem_nhds_iff prod_mem_nhds_iff
theorem prod_mem_nhds {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hy : t ∈ 𝓝 y) :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) :=
prod_mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
#align prod_mem_nhds prod_mem_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds : IsOpen { p : X × X | Disjoint (𝓝 p.1) (𝓝 p.2) } := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, Prod.forall, mem_setOf_eq]
intro x y h
obtain ⟨U, hU, V, hV, hd⟩ := ((nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y)).mp h
exact mem_nhds_prod_iff'.mpr ⟨U, V, hU.2, hU.1, hV.2, hV.1, fun ⟨x', y'⟩ ⟨hx', hy'⟩ =>
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem hd (hU.2.mem_nhds hx') (hV.2.mem_nhds hy')⟩
#align is_open_set_of_disjoint_nhds_nhds isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, q y) : ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x, y), p z.1 ∧ q z.2 :=
prod_mem_nhds hx hy
#align filter.eventually.prod_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds
theorem nhds_swap (x : X) (y : Y) : 𝓝 (x, y) = (𝓝 (y, x)).map Prod.swap := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.prod_comm, nhds_prod_eq]; rfl
#align nhds_swap nhds_swap
theorem Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds {γ} {x : X} {y : Y} {f : Filter γ} {mx : γ → X} {my : γ → Y}
(hx : Tendsto mx f (𝓝 x)) (hy : Tendsto my f (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun c => (mx c, my c)) f (𝓝 (x, y)) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk hx hy
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 636 | 639 | theorem Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds {p : X × Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p x) : ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ y' in 𝓝 y, p (x', y') := by |
rw [nhds_prod_eq] at h
exact h.curry
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Cases
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
#align_import algebra.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a07d750983b94c530ab69a726862c2ab6802b38c"
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section IsLeftCancelMul
variable [Mul G] [IsLeftCancelMul G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_injective (a : G) : Injective (a * ·) := fun _ _ ↦ mul_left_cancel
#align mul_right_injective mul_right_injective
#align add_right_injective add_right_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_right_inj (a : G) {b c : G} : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_right_injective a).eq_iff
#align mul_right_inj mul_right_inj
#align add_right_inj add_right_inj
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_mul_right (a : G) {b c : G} : a * b ≠ a * c ↔ b ≠ c :=
(mul_right_injective a).ne_iff
#align mul_ne_mul_right mul_ne_mul_right
#align add_ne_add_right add_ne_add_right
end IsLeftCancelMul
section IsRightCancelMul
variable [Mul G] [IsRightCancelMul G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_injective (a : G) : Function.Injective (· * a) := fun _ _ ↦ mul_right_cancel
#align mul_left_injective mul_left_injective
#align add_left_injective add_left_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_left_inj (a : G) {b c : G} : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
(mul_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align mul_left_inj mul_left_inj
#align add_left_inj add_left_inj
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_mul_left (a : G) {b c : G} : b * a ≠ c * a ↔ b ≠ c :=
(mul_left_injective a).ne_iff
#align mul_ne_mul_left mul_ne_mul_left
#align add_ne_add_left add_ne_add_left
end IsRightCancelMul
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
#align semigroup.to_is_associative Semigroup.to_isAssociative
#align add_semigroup.to_is_associative AddSemigroup.to_isAssociative
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
#align comp_mul_left comp_mul_left
#align comp_add_left comp_add_left
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
#align comp_mul_right comp_mul_right
#align comp_add_right comp_add_right
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
#align comm_semigroup.to_is_commutative CommMagma.to_isCommutative
#align add_comm_semigroup.to_is_commutative AddCommMagma.to_isCommutative
section MulOneClass
variable {M : Type u} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h:P <;> simp [h]
#align ite_mul_one ite_mul_one
#align ite_add_zero ite_add_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h:P <;> simp [h]
#align ite_one_mul ite_one_mul
#align ite_zero_add ite_zero_add
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
#align eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one
#align eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
#align one_mul_eq_id one_mul_eq_id
#align zero_add_eq_id zero_add_eq_id
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
#align mul_one_eq_id mul_one_eq_id
#align add_zero_eq_id add_zero_eq_id
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm : ∀ a b c : G, a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) :=
left_comm Mul.mul mul_comm mul_assoc
#align mul_left_comm mul_left_comm
#align add_left_comm add_left_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm : ∀ a b c : G, a * b * c = a * c * b :=
right_comm Mul.mul mul_comm mul_assoc
#align mul_right_comm mul_right_comm
#align add_right_comm add_right_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
#align mul_mul_mul_comm mul_mul_mul_comm
#align add_add_add_comm add_add_add_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
#align mul_rotate mul_rotate
#align add_rotate add_rotate
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
#align mul_rotate' mul_rotate'
#align add_rotate' add_rotate'
end CommSemigroup
section AddCommSemigroup
set_option linter.deprecated false
variable {M : Type u} [AddCommSemigroup M]
theorem bit0_add (a b : M) : bit0 (a + b) = bit0 a + bit0 b :=
add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
#align bit0_add bit0_add
theorem bit1_add [One M] (a b : M) : bit1 (a + b) = bit0 a + bit1 b :=
(congr_arg (· + (1 : M)) <| bit0_add a b : _).trans (add_assoc _ _ _)
#align bit1_add bit1_add
theorem bit1_add' [One M] (a b : M) : bit1 (a + b) = bit1 a + bit0 b := by
rw [add_comm, bit1_add, add_comm]
#align bit1_add' bit1_add'
end AddCommSemigroup
section AddMonoid
set_option linter.deprecated false
variable {M : Type u} [AddMonoid M] {a b c : M}
@[simp]
theorem bit0_zero : bit0 (0 : M) = 0 :=
add_zero _
#align bit0_zero bit0_zero
@[simp]
theorem bit1_zero [One M] : bit1 (0 : M) = 1 := by rw [bit1, bit0_zero, zero_add]
#align bit1_zero bit1_zero
end AddMonoid
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b c : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
#align pow_boole pow_boole
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
#align pow_mul_pow_sub pow_mul_pow_sub
#align nsmul_add_sub_nsmul nsmul_add_sub_nsmul
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
#align pow_sub_mul_pow pow_sub_mul_pow
#align sub_nsmul_nsmul_add sub_nsmul_nsmul_add
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel $ Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel $ Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
#align pow_eq_pow_mod pow_eq_pow_mod
#align nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
#align pow_mul_pow_eq_one pow_mul_pow_eq_one
#align nsmul_add_nsmul_eq_zero nsmul_add_nsmul_eq_zero
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
#align inv_unique inv_unique
#align neg_unique neg_unique
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
#align mul_pow mul_pow
#align nsmul_add nsmul_add
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable {M : Type u} [LeftCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_right_eq_self : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
#align mul_right_eq_self mul_right_eq_self
#align add_right_eq_self add_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem self_eq_mul_right : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_right_eq_self
#align self_eq_mul_right self_eq_mul_right
#align self_eq_add_right self_eq_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_ne_self : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_right_eq_self.not
#align mul_right_ne_self mul_right_ne_self
#align add_right_ne_self add_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem self_ne_mul_right : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := self_eq_mul_right.not
#align self_ne_mul_right self_ne_mul_right
#align self_ne_add_right self_ne_add_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable {M : Type u} [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_left_eq_self : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
#align mul_left_eq_self mul_left_eq_self
#align add_left_eq_self add_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem self_eq_mul_left : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_left_eq_self
#align self_eq_mul_left self_eq_mul_left
#align self_eq_add_left self_eq_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_ne_self : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_left_eq_self.not
#align mul_left_ne_self mul_left_ne_self
#align add_left_ne_self add_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem self_ne_mul_left : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := self_eq_mul_left.not
#align self_ne_mul_left self_ne_mul_left
#align self_ne_add_left self_ne_add_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
#align inv_involutive inv_involutive
#align neg_involutive neg_involutive
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
#align inv_surjective inv_surjective
#align neg_surjective neg_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
#align inv_injective inv_injective
#align neg_injective neg_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
#align inv_inj inv_inj
#align neg_inj neg_inj
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
#align inv_eq_iff_eq_inv inv_eq_iff_eq_inv
#align neg_eq_iff_eq_neg neg_eq_iff_eq_neg
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
#align inv_comp_inv inv_comp_inv
#align neg_comp_neg neg_comp_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
#align left_inverse_inv leftInverse_inv
#align left_inverse_neg leftInverse_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
#align right_inverse_inv rightInverse_inv
#align right_inverse_neg rightInverse_neg
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem inv_eq_one_div (x : G) : x⁻¹ = 1 / x := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul]
#align inv_eq_one_div inv_eq_one_div
#align neg_eq_zero_sub neg_eq_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align mul_one_div mul_one_div
#align add_zero_sub add_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_assoc (a b c : G) : a * b / c = a * (b / c) := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc _ _ _]
#align mul_div_assoc mul_div_assoc
#align add_sub_assoc add_sub_assoc
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align mul_div_assoc' mul_div_assoc'
#align add_sub_assoc' add_sub_assoc'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_div (a : G) : 1 / a = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_one_div a).symm
#align one_div one_div
#align zero_sub zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align mul_div mul_div
#align add_sub add_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
#align div_eq_mul_one_div div_eq_mul_one_div
#align sub_eq_add_zero_sub sub_eq_add_zero_sub
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_one div_one
#align sub_zero sub_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
#align one_div_one one_div_one
#align zero_sub_zero zero_sub_zero
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
#align eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right
#align eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
#align eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left
#align eq_zero_sub_of_add_eq_zero_left eq_zero_sub_of_add_eq_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
#align eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right
#align eq_zero_sub_of_add_eq_zero_right eq_zero_sub_of_add_eq_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
#align eq_of_div_eq_one eq_of_div_eq_one
#align eq_of_sub_eq_zero eq_of_sub_eq_zero
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
#align div_ne_one_of_ne div_ne_one_of_ne
#align sub_ne_zero_of_ne sub_ne_zero_of_ne
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
#align one_div_mul_one_div_rev one_div_mul_one_div_rev
#align zero_sub_add_zero_sub_rev zero_sub_add_zero_sub_rev
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
#align inv_div_left inv_div_left
#align neg_sub_left neg_sub_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
#align inv_div inv_div
#align neg_sub neg_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
#align one_div_div one_div_div
#align zero_sub_sub zero_sub_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
#align one_div_one_div one_div_one_div
#align zero_sub_zero_sub zero_sub_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive SubtractionMonoid.toSubNegZeroMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
#align inv_pow inv_pow
#align neg_nsmul neg_nsmul
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
#align one_zpow one_zpow
#align zsmul_zero zsmul_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by
change a ^ (0 : ℤ) = (a ^ (0 : ℤ))⁻¹
simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
#align zpow_neg zpow_neg
#align neg_zsmul neg_zsmul
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
#align mul_zpow_neg_one mul_zpow_neg_one
#align neg_one_zsmul_add neg_one_zsmul_add
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
#align inv_zpow inv_zpow
#align zsmul_neg zsmul_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
#align inv_zpow' inv_zpow'
#align zsmul_neg' zsmul_neg'
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
#align one_div_pow one_div_pow
#align nsmul_zero_sub nsmul_zero_sub
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
#align one_div_zpow one_div_zpow
#align zsmul_zero_sub zsmul_zero_sub
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
#align inv_eq_one inv_eq_one
#align neg_eq_zero neg_eq_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
#align one_eq_inv one_eq_inv
#align zero_eq_neg zero_eq_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
#align inv_ne_one inv_ne_one
#align neg_ne_zero neg_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
#align eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div
#align eq_of_zero_sub_eq_zero_sub eq_of_zero_sub_eq_zero_sub
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
#align zpow_mul zpow_mul
#align mul_zsmul' mul_zsmul'
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
#align zpow_mul' zpow_mul'
#align mul_zsmul mul_zsmul
#noalign zpow_bit0
#noalign bit0_zsmul
#noalign zpow_bit0'
#noalign bit0_zsmul'
#noalign zpow_bit1
#noalign bit1_zsmul
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
#align div_div_eq_mul_div div_div_eq_mul_div
#align sub_sub_eq_add_sub sub_sub_eq_add_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
#align div_inv_eq_mul div_inv_eq_mul
#align sub_neg_eq_add sub_neg_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_mul_eq_div_div_swap div_mul_eq_div_div_swap
#align sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap
end DivisionMonoid
section SubtractionMonoid
set_option linter.deprecated false
lemma bit0_neg [SubtractionMonoid α] (a : α) : bit0 (-a) = -bit0 a := (neg_add_rev _ _).symm
#align bit0_neg bit0_neg
end SubtractionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
#align mul_inv mul_inv
#align neg_add neg_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
#align inv_div' inv_div'
#align neg_sub' neg_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
#align div_eq_inv_mul div_eq_inv_mul
#align sub_eq_neg_add sub_eq_neg_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
#align inv_mul_eq_div inv_mul_eq_div
#align neg_add_eq_sub neg_add_eq_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
#align inv_mul' inv_mul'
#align neg_add' neg_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
#align inv_div_inv inv_div_inv
#align neg_sub_neg neg_sub_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
#align inv_inv_div_inv inv_inv_div_inv
#align neg_neg_sub_neg neg_neg_sub_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
#align one_div_mul_one_div one_div_mul_one_div
#align zero_sub_add_zero_sub zero_sub_add_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
#align div_right_comm div_right_comm
#align sub_right_comm sub_right_comm
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
#align div_div div_div
#align sub_sub sub_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul : a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by simp
#align div_mul div_mul
#align sub_add sub_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_left_comm : a * (b / c) = b * (a / c) := by simp
#align mul_div_left_comm mul_div_left_comm
#align add_sub_left_comm add_sub_left_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by simp
#align mul_div_right_comm mul_div_right_comm
#align add_sub_right_comm add_sub_right_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div : a / (b * c) = a / b / c := by simp
#align div_mul_eq_div_div div_mul_eq_div_div
#align sub_add_eq_sub_sub sub_add_eq_sub_sub
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_mul_eq_mul_div : a / b * c = a * c / b := by simp
#align div_mul_eq_mul_div div_mul_eq_mul_div
#align sub_add_eq_add_sub sub_add_eq_add_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_eq_div : 1 / a * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by simp
#align mul_comm_div mul_comm_div
#align add_comm_sub add_comm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_comm : a / b * c = c / b * a := by simp
#align div_mul_comm div_mul_comm
#align sub_add_comm sub_add_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div : a / (b * c) = a / b * (1 / c) := by simp
#align div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div
#align sub_add_eq_sub_add_zero_sub sub_add_eq_sub_add_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_eq : a / b / (c / d) = a * d / (b * c) := by simp
#align div_div_div_eq div_div_div_eq
#align sub_sub_sub_eq sub_sub_sub_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_comm : a / b / (c / d) = a / c / (b / d) := by simp
#align div_div_div_comm div_div_div_comm
#align sub_sub_sub_comm sub_sub_sub_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_div_comm : a / b * (c / d) = a * c / (b * d) := by simp
#align div_mul_div_comm div_mul_div_comm
#align sub_add_sub_comm sub_add_sub_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_mul_comm : a * b / (c * d) = a / c * (b / d) := by simp
#align mul_div_mul_comm mul_div_mul_comm
#align add_sub_add_comm add_sub_add_comm
@[to_additive zsmul_add] lemma mul_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp_rw [zpow_natCast, mul_pow]
| .negSucc n => by simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_pow]
#align mul_zpow mul_zpow
#align zsmul_add zsmul_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nsmul_sub]
lemma div_pow (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow, inv_pow]
#align div_pow div_pow
#align nsmul_sub nsmul_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_sub]
lemma div_zpow (a b : α) (n : ℤ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_zpow, inv_zpow]
#align div_zpow div_zpow
#align zsmul_sub zsmul_sub
end DivisionCommMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {a b c d : G} {n : ℤ}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_inv_self : a / b = b⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_left_eq_self]
#align div_eq_inv_self div_eq_inv_self
#align sub_eq_neg_self sub_eq_neg_self
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_surjective (a : G) : Surjective (a * ·) :=
fun x ↦ ⟨a⁻¹ * x, mul_inv_cancel_left a x⟩
#align mul_left_surjective mul_left_surjective
#align add_left_surjective add_left_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_surjective (a : G) : Function.Surjective fun x ↦ x * a := fun x ↦
⟨x * a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_right x a⟩
#align mul_right_surjective mul_right_surjective
#align add_right_surjective add_right_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (h : a * c = b) : a = b * c⁻¹ := by simp [h.symm]
#align eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq
#align eq_add_neg_of_add_eq eq_add_neg_of_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (h : b * a = c) : a = b⁻¹ * c := by simp [h.symm]
#align eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq
#align eq_neg_add_of_add_eq eq_neg_add_of_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul (h : b = a * c) : a⁻¹ * b = c := by simp [h]
#align inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul
#align neg_add_eq_of_eq_add neg_add_eq_of_eq_add
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 895 | 895 | theorem mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul (h : a = c * b) : a * b⁻¹ = c := by | simp [h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import analysis.normed.group.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8f305514e0d47dfaa710f5a52f0d21b588e6328"
/-!
# Properties of pointwise addition of sets in normed groups
We explore the relationships between pointwise addition of sets in normed groups, and the norm.
Notably, we show that the sum of bounded sets remain bounded.
-/
open Metric Set Pointwise Topology
variable {E : Type*}
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] {ε δ : ℝ} {s t : Set E} {x y : E}
-- note: we can't use `LipschitzOnWith.isBounded_image2` here without adding `[IsometricSMul E E]`
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.mul (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s * t) := by
obtain ⟨Rs, hRs⟩ : ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R := hs.exists_norm_le'
obtain ⟨Rt, hRt⟩ : ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ t, ‖x‖ ≤ R := ht.exists_norm_le'
refine isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.2 ⟨Rs + Rt, ?_⟩
rintro z ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
exact norm_mul_le_of_le (hRs x hx) (hRt y hy)
#align metric.bounded.mul Bornology.IsBounded.mul
#align metric.bounded.add Bornology.IsBounded.add
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.of_mul (hst : IsBounded (s * t)) : IsBounded s ∨ IsBounded t :=
AntilipschitzWith.isBounded_of_image2_left _ (fun x => (isometry_mul_right x).antilipschitz) hst
#align metric.bounded.of_mul Bornology.IsBounded.of_mul
#align metric.bounded.of_add Bornology.IsBounded.of_add
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.inv : IsBounded s → IsBounded s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le', ← image_inv, forall_mem_image, norm_inv']
exact id
#align metric.bounded.inv Bornology.IsBounded.inv
#align metric.bounded.neg Bornology.IsBounded.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.div (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s / t) :=
div_eq_mul_inv s t ▸ hs.mul ht.inv
#align metric.bounded.div Bornology.IsBounded.div
#align metric.bounded.sub Bornology.IsBounded.sub
end SeminormedGroup
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] {ε δ : ℝ} {s t : Set E} {x y : E}
section EMetric
open EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_inv_inv (x : E) (s : Set E) : infEdist x⁻¹ s⁻¹ = infEdist x s := by
rw [← image_inv, infEdist_image isometry_inv]
#align inf_edist_inv_inv infEdist_inv_inv
#align inf_edist_neg_neg infEdist_neg_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem infEdist_inv (x : E) (s : Set E) : infEdist x⁻¹ s = infEdist x s⁻¹ := by
rw [← infEdist_inv_inv, inv_inv]
#align inf_edist_inv infEdist_inv
#align inf_edist_neg infEdist_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ediam_mul_le (x y : Set E) : EMetric.diam (x * y) ≤ EMetric.diam x + EMetric.diam y :=
(LipschitzOnWith.ediam_image2_le (· * ·) _ _
(fun _ _ => (isometry_mul_right _).lipschitz.lipschitzOnWith _) fun _ _ =>
(isometry_mul_left _).lipschitz.lipschitzOnWith _).trans_eq <|
by simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
#align ediam_mul_le ediam_mul_le
#align ediam_add_le ediam_add_le
end EMetric
variable (ε δ s t x y)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_thickening : (thickening δ s)⁻¹ = thickening δ s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [thickening, ← infEdist_inv]
rfl
#align inv_thickening inv_thickening
#align neg_thickening neg_thickening
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_cthickening : (cthickening δ s)⁻¹ = cthickening δ s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [cthickening, ← infEdist_inv]
rfl
#align inv_cthickening inv_cthickening
#align neg_cthickening neg_cthickening
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_ball : (ball x δ)⁻¹ = ball x⁻¹ δ := (IsometryEquiv.inv E).preimage_ball x δ
#align inv_ball inv_ball
#align neg_ball neg_ball
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_closedBall : (closedBall x δ)⁻¹ = closedBall x⁻¹ δ :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv E).preimage_closedBall x δ
#align inv_closed_ball inv_closedBall
#align neg_closed_ball neg_closedBall
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_ball : {x} * ball y δ = ball (x * y) δ := by
simp only [preimage_mul_ball, image_mul_left, singleton_mul, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm y x]
#align singleton_mul_ball singleton_mul_ball
#align singleton_add_ball singleton_add_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_ball : {x} / ball y δ = ball (x / y) δ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_ball, singleton_mul_ball]
#align singleton_div_ball singleton_div_ball
#align singleton_sub_ball singleton_sub_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_mul_singleton : ball x δ * {y} = ball (x * y) δ := by
rw [mul_comm, singleton_mul_ball, mul_comm y]
#align ball_mul_singleton ball_mul_singleton
#align ball_add_singleton ball_add_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_div_singleton : ball x δ / {y} = ball (x / y) δ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_singleton, ball_mul_singleton]
#align ball_div_singleton ball_div_singleton
#align ball_sub_singleton ball_sub_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_ball_one : {x} * ball 1 δ = ball x δ := by simp
#align singleton_mul_ball_one singleton_mul_ball_one
#align singleton_add_ball_zero singleton_add_ball_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_ball_one : {x} / ball 1 δ = ball x δ := by
rw [singleton_div_ball, div_one]
#align singleton_div_ball_one singleton_div_ball_one
#align singleton_sub_ball_zero singleton_sub_ball_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_mul_singleton : ball 1 δ * {x} = ball x δ := by simp [ball_mul_singleton]
#align ball_one_mul_singleton ball_one_mul_singleton
#align ball_zero_add_singleton ball_zero_add_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_div_singleton : ball 1 δ / {x} = ball x⁻¹ δ := by
rw [ball_div_singleton, one_div]
#align ball_one_div_singleton ball_one_div_singleton
#align ball_zero_sub_singleton ball_zero_sub_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_ball_one : x • ball (1 : E) δ = ball x δ := by
rw [smul_ball, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
#align smul_ball_one smul_ball_one
#align vadd_ball_zero vadd_ball_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem singleton_mul_closedBall : {x} * closedBall y δ = closedBall (x * y) δ := by
simp_rw [singleton_mul, ← smul_eq_mul, image_smul, smul_closedBall]
#align singleton_mul_closed_ball singleton_mul_closedBall
#align singleton_add_closed_ball singleton_add_closedBall
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem singleton_div_closedBall : {x} / closedBall y δ = closedBall (x / y) δ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_closedBall, singleton_mul_closedBall]
#align singleton_div_closed_ball singleton_div_closedBall
#align singleton_sub_closed_ball singleton_sub_closedBall
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem closedBall_mul_singleton : closedBall x δ * {y} = closedBall (x * y) δ := by
simp [mul_comm _ {y}, mul_comm y]
#align closed_ball_mul_singleton closedBall_mul_singleton
#align closed_ball_add_singleton closedBall_add_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem closedBall_div_singleton : closedBall x δ / {y} = closedBall (x / y) δ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align closed_ball_div_singleton closedBall_div_singleton
#align closed_ball_sub_singleton closedBall_sub_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_closedBall_one : {x} * closedBall 1 δ = closedBall x δ := by simp
#align singleton_mul_closed_ball_one singleton_mul_closedBall_one
#align singleton_add_closed_ball_zero singleton_add_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_closedBall_one : {x} / closedBall 1 δ = closedBall x δ := by
rw [singleton_div_closedBall, div_one]
#align singleton_div_closed_ball_one singleton_div_closedBall_one
#align singleton_sub_closed_ball_zero singleton_sub_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem closedBall_one_mul_singleton : closedBall 1 δ * {x} = closedBall x δ := by simp
#align closed_ball_one_mul_singleton closedBall_one_mul_singleton
#align closed_ball_zero_add_singleton closedBall_zero_add_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem closedBall_one_div_singleton : closedBall 1 δ / {x} = closedBall x⁻¹ δ := by simp
#align closed_ball_one_div_singleton closedBall_one_div_singleton
#align closed_ball_zero_sub_singleton closedBall_zero_sub_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem smul_closedBall_one : x • closedBall (1 : E) δ = closedBall x δ := by simp
#align smul_closed_ball_one smul_closedBall_one
#align vadd_closed_ball_zero vadd_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ball_one : s * ball 1 δ = thickening δ s := by
rw [thickening_eq_biUnion_ball]
convert iUnion₂_mul (fun x (_ : x ∈ s) => {x}) (ball (1 : E) δ)
· exact s.biUnion_of_singleton.symm
ext x
simp_rw [singleton_mul_ball, mul_one]
#align mul_ball_one mul_ball_one
#align add_ball_zero add_ball_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ball_one : s / ball 1 δ = thickening δ s := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_ball_one]
#align div_ball_one div_ball_one
#align sub_ball_zero sub_ball_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_mul_one : ball 1 δ * s = thickening δ s := by rw [mul_comm, mul_ball_one]
#align ball_mul_one ball_mul_one
#align ball_add_zero ball_add_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_div_one : ball 1 δ / s = thickening δ s⁻¹ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ball_mul_one]
#align ball_div_one ball_div_one
#align ball_sub_zero ball_sub_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_ball : s * ball x δ = x • thickening δ s := by
rw [← smul_ball_one, mul_smul_comm, mul_ball_one]
#align mul_ball mul_ball
#align add_ball add_ball
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_ball : s / ball x δ = x⁻¹ • thickening δ s := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_ball div_ball
#align sub_ball sub_ball
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ball_mul : ball x δ * s = x • thickening δ s := by rw [mul_comm, mul_ball]
#align ball_mul ball_mul
#align ball_add ball_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ball_div : ball x δ / s = x • thickening δ s⁻¹ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align ball_div ball_div
#align ball_sub ball_sub
variable {ε δ s t x y}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.mul_closedBall_one (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
s * closedBall (1 : E) δ = cthickening δ s := by
rw [hs.cthickening_eq_biUnion_closedBall hδ]
ext x
simp only [mem_mul, dist_eq_norm_div, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, exists_and_left,
mem_closedBall_one_iff, ← eq_div_iff_mul_eq'', div_one, exists_eq_right]
#align is_compact.mul_closed_ball_one IsCompact.mul_closedBall_one
#align is_compact.add_closed_ball_zero IsCompact.add_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.div_closedBall_one (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
s / closedBall 1 δ = cthickening δ s := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, hs.mul_closedBall_one hδ]
#align is_compact.div_closed_ball_one IsCompact.div_closedBall_one
#align is_compact.sub_closed_ball_zero IsCompact.sub_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.closedBall_one_mul (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
closedBall 1 δ * s = cthickening δ s := by rw [mul_comm, hs.mul_closedBall_one hδ]
#align is_compact.closed_ball_one_mul IsCompact.closedBall_one_mul
#align is_compact.closed_ball_zero_add IsCompact.closedBall_zero_add
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.closedBall_one_div (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
closedBall 1 δ / s = cthickening δ s⁻¹ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, hs.inv.mul_closedBall_one hδ]
#align is_compact.closed_ball_one_div IsCompact.closedBall_one_div
#align is_compact.closed_ball_zero_sub IsCompact.closedBall_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.mul_closedBall (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (x : E) :
s * closedBall x δ = x • cthickening δ s := by
rw [← smul_closedBall_one, mul_smul_comm, hs.mul_closedBall_one hδ]
#align is_compact.mul_closed_ball IsCompact.mul_closedBall
#align is_compact.add_closed_ball IsCompact.add_closedBall
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Pointwise.lean | 305 | 307 | theorem IsCompact.div_closedBall (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (x : E) :
s / closedBall x δ = x⁻¹ • cthickening δ s := by |
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, hs.mul_closedBall hδ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kevin H. Wilson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin H. Wilson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
#align_import analysis.calculus.uniform_limits_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
/-!
# Swapping limits and derivatives via uniform convergence
The purpose of this file is to prove that the derivative of the pointwise limit of a sequence of
functions is the pointwise limit of the functions' derivatives when the derivatives converge
_uniformly_. The formal statement appears as `hasFDerivAt_of_tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn`.
## Main statements
* `uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_of_fderiv`: If
1. `f : ℕ → E → G` is a sequence of functions which have derivatives
`f' : ℕ → E → (E →L[𝕜] G)` on a neighborhood of `x`,
2. the functions `f` converge at `x`, and
3. the derivatives `f'` form a Cauchy sequence uniformly on a neighborhood of `x`,
then the `f` form a Cauchy sequence _uniformly_ on a neighborhood of `x`
* `hasFDerivAt_of_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter` : Suppose (1), (2), and (3) above are true. Let
`g` (resp. `g'`) be the limiting function of the `f` (resp. `g'`). Then `f'` is the derivative of
`g` on a neighborhood of `x`
* `hasFDerivAt_of_tendstoUniformlyOn`: An often-easier-to-use version of the above theorem when
*all* the derivatives exist and functions converge on a common open set and the derivatives
converge uniformly there.
Each of the above statements also has variations that support `deriv` instead of `fderiv`.
## Implementation notes
Our technique for proving the main result is the famous "`ε / 3` proof." In words, you can find it
explained, for instance, at [this StackExchange post](https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/214218/uniform-convergence-of-derivatives-tao-14-2-7).
The subtlety is that we want to prove that the difference quotients of the `g` converge to the `g'`.
That is, we want to prove something like:
```
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ y ∈ B_δ(x), |y - x|⁻¹ * |(g y - g x) - g' x (y - x)| < ε.
```
To do so, we will need to introduce a pair of quantifiers
```lean
∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ y ∈ B_δ(x), |y - x|⁻¹ * |(g y - g x) - g' x (y - x)| < ε.
```
So how do we write this in terms of filters? Well, the initial definition of the derivative is
```lean
tendsto (|y - x|⁻¹ * |(g y - g x) - g' x (y - x)|) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0)
```
There are two ways we might introduce `n`. We could do:
```lean
∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, Tendsto (|y - x|⁻¹ * |(g y - g x) - g' x (y - x)|) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0)
```
but this is equivalent to the quantifier order `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ y ∈ B_δ(x)`,
which _implies_ our desired `∀ ∃ ∀ ∃ ∀` but is _not_ equivalent to it. On the other hand, we might
try
```lean
Tendsto (|y - x|⁻¹ * |(g y - g x) - g' x (y - x)|) (atTop ×ˢ 𝓝 x) (𝓝 0)
```
but this is equivalent to the quantifier order `∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ n ≥ N, ∀ y ∈ B_δ(x)`, which
again _implies_ our desired `∀ ∃ ∀ ∃ ∀` but is not equivalent to it.
So to get the quantifier order we want, we need to introduce a new filter construction, which we
call a "curried filter"
```lean
Tendsto (|y - x|⁻¹ * |(g y - g x) - g' x (y - x)|) (atTop.curry (𝓝 x)) (𝓝 0)
```
Then the above implications are `Filter.Tendsto.curry` and
`Filter.Tendsto.mono_left Filter.curry_le_prod`. We will use both of these deductions as part of
our proof.
We note that if you loosen the assumptions of the main theorem then the proof becomes quite a bit
easier. In particular, if you assume there is a common neighborhood `s` where all of the three
assumptions of `hasFDerivAt_of_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter` hold and that the `f'` are
continuous, then you can avoid the mean value theorem and much of the work around curried filters.
## Tags
uniform convergence, limits of derivatives
-/
open Filter
open scoped uniformity Filter Topology
section LimitsOfDerivatives
variable {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] {f : ι → E → G}
{g : E → G} {f' : ι → E → E →L[𝕜] G} {g' : E → E →L[𝕜] G} {x : E}
/-- If a sequence of functions real or complex functions are eventually differentiable on a
neighborhood of `x`, they are Cauchy _at_ `x`, and their derivatives
are a uniform Cauchy sequence in a neighborhood of `x`, then the functions form a uniform Cauchy
sequence in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/UniformLimitsDeriv.lean | 112 | 163 | theorem uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_of_fderiv (hf' : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter f' l (𝓝 x))
(hf : ∀ᶠ n : ι × E in l ×ˢ 𝓝 x, HasFDerivAt (f n.1) (f' n.1 n.2) n.2)
(hfg : Cauchy (map (fun n => f n x) l)) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter f l (𝓝 x) := by |
letI : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 _
rw [SeminormedAddGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_zero] at hf' ⊢
suffices
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (n : ι × ι) (z : E) => f n.1 z - f n.2 z - (f n.1 x - f n.2 x)) 0
(l ×ˢ l) (𝓝 x) ∧
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (n : ι × ι) (_ : E) => f n.1 x - f n.2 x) 0 (l ×ˢ l) (𝓝 x) by
have := this.1.add this.2
rw [add_zero] at this
exact this.congr (by simp)
constructor
· -- This inequality follows from the mean value theorem. To apply it, we will need to shrink our
-- neighborhood to small enough ball
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff] at hf' ⊢
intro ε hε
have := (tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually (hf.prod_mk hf)).diag_of_prod_right
obtain ⟨a, b, c, d, e⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 ((hf' ε hε).and this)
obtain ⟨R, hR, hR'⟩ := Metric.nhds_basis_ball.eventually_iff.mp d
let r := min 1 R
have hr : 0 < r := by simp [r, hR]
have hr' : ∀ ⦃y : E⦄, y ∈ Metric.ball x r → c y := fun y hy =>
hR' (lt_of_lt_of_le (Metric.mem_ball.mp hy) (min_le_right _ _))
have hxy : ∀ y : E, y ∈ Metric.ball x r → ‖y - x‖ < 1 := by
intro y hy
rw [Metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hy
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hy (min_le_left _ _)
have hxyε : ∀ y : E, y ∈ Metric.ball x r → ε * ‖y - x‖ < ε := by
intro y hy
exact (mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right hε.lt).mpr (hxy y hy)
-- With a small ball in hand, apply the mean value theorem
refine
eventually_prod_iff.mpr
⟨_, b, fun e : E => Metric.ball x r e,
eventually_mem_set.mpr (Metric.nhds_basis_ball.mem_of_mem hr), fun {n} hn {y} hy => ?_⟩
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, dist_zero_left] at e ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (hxyε y hy)
exact
Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun y hy => ((e hn (hr' hy)).2.1.sub (e hn (hr' hy)).2.2).hasFDerivWithinAt)
(fun y hy => (e hn (hr' hy)).1.le) (convex_ball x r) (Metric.mem_ball_self hr) hy
· -- This is just `hfg` run through `eventually_prod_iff`
refine Metric.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff.mpr fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := (Metric.cauchy_iff.mp hfg).2 ε hε
exact
eventually_prod_iff.mpr
⟨fun n : ι × ι => f n.1 x ∈ t ∧ f n.2 x ∈ t,
eventually_prod_iff.mpr ⟨_, ht, _, ht, fun {n} hn {n'} hn' => ⟨hn, hn'⟩⟩,
fun _ => True,
by simp,
fun {n} hn {y} _ => by simpa [norm_sub_rev, dist_eq_norm] using ht' _ hn.1 _ hn.2⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import order.upper_lower.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c0c52abb75074ed8b73a948341f50521fbf43b4c"
/-!
# Up-sets and down-sets
This file defines upper and lower sets in an order.
## Main declarations
* `IsUpperSet`: Predicate for a set to be an upper set. This means every element greater than a
member of the set is in the set itself.
* `IsLowerSet`: Predicate for a set to be a lower set. This means every element less than a member
of the set is in the set itself.
* `UpperSet`: The type of upper sets.
* `LowerSet`: The type of lower sets.
* `upperClosure`: The greatest upper set containing a set.
* `lowerClosure`: The least lower set containing a set.
* `UpperSet.Ici`: Principal upper set. `Set.Ici` as an upper set.
* `UpperSet.Ioi`: Strict principal upper set. `Set.Ioi` as an upper set.
* `LowerSet.Iic`: Principal lower set. `Set.Iic` as a lower set.
* `LowerSet.Iio`: Strict principal lower set. `Set.Iio` as a lower set.
## Notation
* `×ˢ` is notation for `UpperSet.prod` / `LowerSet.prod`.
## Notes
Upper sets are ordered by **reverse** inclusion. This convention is motivated by the fact that this
makes them order-isomorphic to lower sets and antichains, and matches the convention on `Filter`.
## TODO
Lattice structure on antichains. Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-! ### Unbundled upper/lower sets -/
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
/-- An upper set in an order `α` is a set such that any element greater than one of its members is
also a member. Also called up-set, upward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsUpperSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a ≤ b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_upper_set IsUpperSet
/-- A lower set in an order `α` is a set such that any element less than one of its members is also
a member. Also called down-set, downward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsLowerSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b ≤ a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_lower_set IsLowerSet
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_empty isUpperSet_empty
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_empty isLowerSet_empty
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_univ isUpperSet_univ
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_univ isLowerSet_univ
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_upper_set.compl IsUpperSet.compl
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_lower_set.compl IsLowerSet.compl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
#align is_upper_set_compl isUpperSet_compl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
#align is_lower_set_compl isLowerSet_compl
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.union IsUpperSet.union
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.union IsLowerSet.union
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.inter IsUpperSet.inter
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.inter IsLowerSet.inter
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_upper_set_sUnion isUpperSet_sUnion
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_lower_set_sUnion isLowerSet_sUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Union isUpperSet_iUnion
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Union isLowerSet_iUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Union₂ isUpperSet_iUnion₂
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Union₂ isLowerSet_iUnion₂
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_upper_set_sInter isUpperSet_sInter
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_lower_set_sInter isLowerSet_sInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Inter isUpperSet_iInter
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Inter isLowerSet_iInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Inter₂ isUpperSet_iInter₂
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Inter₂ isLowerSet_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.to_dual IsUpperSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.to_dual IsLowerSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.of_dual IsUpperSet.ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.of_dual IsLowerSet.ofDual
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
#align is_upper_set_Ici isUpperSet_Ici
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
#align is_lower_set_Iic isLowerSet_Iic
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
#align is_upper_set_Ioi isUpperSet_Ioi
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
#align is_lower_set_Iio isLowerSet_Iio
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_upper_set_iff_Ici_subset isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 252 | 253 | theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by |
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Matthew Robert Ballard
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Digits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.MaxPowDiv
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import number_theory.padics.padic_val from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60fa54e778c9e85d930efae172435f42fb0d71f7"
/-!
# `p`-adic Valuation
This file defines the `p`-adic valuation on `ℕ`, `ℤ`, and `ℚ`.
The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` is the difference of the multiplicities of `p` in the numerator and
denominator of `q`. This function obeys the standard properties of a valuation, with the appropriate
assumptions on `p`. The `p`-adic valuations on `ℕ` and `ℤ` agree with that on `ℚ`.
The valuation induces a norm on `ℚ`. This norm is defined in padicNorm.lean.
## Notations
This file uses the local notation `/.` for `Rat.mk`.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
## Calculations with `p`-adic valuations
* `padicValNat_factorial`: Legendre's Theorem. The `p`-adic valuation of `n!` is the sum of the
quotients `n / p ^ i`. This sum is expressed over the finset `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound
greater than `log p n`. See `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_factorial` for the same result but stated in the
language of prime multiplicity.
* `sub_one_mul_padicValNat_factorial`: Legendre's Theorem. Taking (`p - 1`) times
the `p`-adic valuation of `n!` equals `n` minus the sum of base `p` digits of `n`.
* `padicValNat_choose`: Kummer's Theorem. The `p`-adic valuation of `n.choose k` is the number
of carries when `k` and `n - k` are added in base `p`. This sum is expressed over the finset
`Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than `log p n`. See `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_choose` for the
same result but stated in the language of prime multiplicity.
* `sub_one_mul_padicValNat_choose_eq_sub_sum_digits`: Kummer's Theorem. Taking (`p - 1`) times the
`p`-adic valuation of the binomial `n` over `k` equals the sum of the digits of `k` plus the sum of
the digits of `n - k` minus the sum of digits of `n`, all base `p`.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation
-/
universe u
open Nat
open Rat
open multiplicity
/-- For `p ≠ 1`, the `p`-adic valuation of a natural `n ≠ 0` is the largest natural number `k` such
that `p^k` divides `n`. If `n = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValNat p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValNat (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if h : p ≠ 1 ∧ 0 < n then (multiplicity p n).get (multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.2 h) else 0
#align padic_val_nat padicValNat
namespace padicValNat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
/-- `padicValNat p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValNat p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValNat]
#align padic_val_nat.zero padicValNat.zero
/-- `padicValNat p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValNat p 1 = 0 := by
unfold padicValNat
split_ifs
· simp
· rfl
#align padic_val_nat.one padicValNat.one
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValNat p p` is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValNat p p = 1 := by
have neq_one : ¬p = 1 ↔ True := iff_of_true hp.ne' trivial
have eq_zero_false : p = 0 ↔ False := iff_false_intro (zero_lt_one.trans hp).ne'
simp [padicValNat, neq_one, eq_zero_false]
#align padic_val_nat.self padicValNat.self
@[simp]
theorem eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : padicValNat p n = 0 ↔ p = 1 ∨ n = 0 ∨ ¬p ∣ n := by
simp only [padicValNat, dite_eq_right_iff, PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe, Nat.cast_zero,
multiplicity_eq_zero, and_imp, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ← or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align padic_val_nat.eq_zero_iff padicValNat.eq_zero_iff
theorem eq_zero_of_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (h : ¬p ∣ n) : padicValNat p n = 0 :=
eq_zero_iff.2 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr h
#align padic_val_nat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd
open Nat.maxPowDiv
theorem maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity {p n : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hn : 0 < n) :
p.maxPowDiv n = multiplicity p n := by
apply multiplicity.unique <| pow_dvd p n
intro h
apply Nat.not_lt.mpr <| le_of_dvd hp hn h
simp
theorem maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity_get {p n : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hn : 0 < n) (h : Finite p n) :
p.maxPowDiv n = (multiplicity p n).get h := by
rw [PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe.mpr]
apply maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity hp hn|>.symm
/-- Allows for more efficient code for `padicValNat` -/
@[csimp]
theorem padicValNat_eq_maxPowDiv : @padicValNat = @maxPowDiv := by
ext p n
by_cases h : 1 < p ∧ 0 < n
· dsimp [padicValNat]
rw [dif_pos ⟨Nat.ne_of_gt h.1,h.2⟩, maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity_get h.1 h.2]
· simp only [not_and_or,not_gt_eq,Nat.le_zero] at h
apply h.elim
· intro h
interval_cases p
· simp [Classical.em]
· dsimp [padicValNat, maxPowDiv]
rw [go, if_neg, dif_neg] <;> simp
· intro h
simp [h]
end padicValNat
/-- For `p ≠ 1`, the `p`-adic valuation of an integer `z ≠ 0` is the largest natural number `k` such
that `p^k` divides `z`. If `x = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValInt p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValInt (p : ℕ) (z : ℤ) : ℕ :=
padicValNat p z.natAbs
#align padic_val_int padicValInt
namespace padicValInt
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
theorem of_ne_one_ne_zero {z : ℤ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
padicValInt p z =
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) z).get
(by
apply multiplicity.finite_int_iff.2
simp [hp, hz]) := by
rw [padicValInt, padicValNat, dif_pos (And.intro hp (Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hz))]
simp only [multiplicity.Int.natAbs p z]
#align padic_val_int.of_ne_one_ne_zero padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero
/-- `padicValInt p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValInt p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.zero padicValInt.zero
/-- `padicValInt p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValInt p 1 = 0 := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.one padicValInt.one
/-- The `p`-adic value of a natural is its `p`-adic value as an integer. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_nat {n : ℕ} : padicValInt p n = padicValNat p n := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.of_nat padicValInt.of_nat
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValInt p p` is `1`. -/
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValInt p p = 1 := by simp [padicValNat.self hp]
#align padic_val_int.self padicValInt.self
theorem eq_zero_of_not_dvd {z : ℤ} (h : ¬(p : ℤ) ∣ z) : padicValInt p z = 0 := by
rw [padicValInt, padicValNat]
split_ifs <;> simp [multiplicity.Int.natAbs, multiplicity_eq_zero.2 h]
#align padic_val_int.eq_zero_of_not_dvd padicValInt.eq_zero_of_not_dvd
end padicValInt
/-- `padicValRat` defines the valuation of a rational `q` to be the valuation of `q.num` minus the
valuation of `q.den`. If `q = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValRat p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValRat (p : ℕ) (q : ℚ) : ℤ :=
padicValInt p q.num - padicValNat p q.den
#align padic_val_rat padicValRat
lemma padicValRat_def (p : ℕ) (q : ℚ) :
padicValRat p q = padicValInt p q.num - padicValNat p q.den :=
rfl
namespace padicValRat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
/-- `padicValRat p q` is symmetric in `q`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem neg (q : ℚ) : padicValRat p (-q) = padicValRat p q := by
simp [padicValRat, padicValInt]
#align padic_val_rat.neg padicValRat.neg
/-- `padicValRat p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValRat p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.zero padicValRat.zero
/-- `padicValRat p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValRat p 1 = 0 := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.one padicValRat.one
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is its `p`-adic_value as a rational. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_int {z : ℤ} : padicValRat p z = padicValInt p z := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.of_int padicValRat.of_int
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is the multiplicity of `p` in `z`. -/
theorem of_int_multiplicity {z : ℤ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (z : ℚ) = (multiplicity (p : ℤ) z).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp, hz⟩) := by
rw [of_int, padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero hp hz]
#align padic_val_rat.of_int_multiplicity padicValRat.of_int_multiplicity
theorem multiplicity_sub_multiplicity {q : ℚ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p q =
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) q.num).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp, Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hq⟩) -
(multiplicity p q.den).get
(by
rw [← finite_iff_dom, finite_nat_iff]
exact ⟨hp, q.pos⟩) := by
rw [padicValRat, padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero hp, padicValNat, dif_pos]
· exact ⟨hp, q.pos⟩
· exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hq
#align padic_val_rat.multiplicity_sub_multiplicity padicValRat.multiplicity_sub_multiplicity
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is its `p`-adic value as a rational. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_nat {n : ℕ} : padicValRat p n = padicValNat p n := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.of_nat padicValRat.of_nat
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValRat p p` is `1`. -/
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValRat p p = 1 := by simp [hp]
#align padic_val_rat.self padicValRat.self
end padicValRat
section padicValNat
variable {p : ℕ}
theorem zero_le_padicValRat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ padicValRat p n := by simp
#align zero_le_padic_val_rat_of_nat zero_le_padicValRat_of_nat
/-- `padicValRat` coincides with `padicValNat`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem padicValRat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : ↑(padicValNat p n) = padicValRat p n := by simp
#align padic_val_rat_of_nat padicValRat_of_nat
/-- A simplification of `padicValNat` when one input is prime, by analogy with
`padicValRat_def`. -/
theorem padicValNat_def [hp : Fact p.Prime] {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
padicValNat p n = (multiplicity p n).get (multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.2 ⟨hp.out.ne_one, hn⟩) :=
dif_pos ⟨hp.out.ne_one, hn⟩
#align padic_val_nat_def padicValNat_def
theorem padicValNat_def' {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hn : 0 < n) :
↑(padicValNat p n) = multiplicity p n := by simp [padicValNat, hp, hn]
#align padic_val_nat_def' padicValNat_def'
@[simp]
theorem padicValNat_self [Fact p.Prime] : padicValNat p p = 1 := by
rw [padicValNat_def (@Fact.out p.Prime).pos]
simp
#align padic_val_nat_self padicValNat_self
theorem one_le_padicValNat_of_dvd {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hn : 0 < n) (div : p ∣ n) :
1 ≤ padicValNat p n := by
rwa [← PartENat.coe_le_coe, padicValNat_def' hp.out.ne_one hn, ← pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity,
pow_one]
#align one_le_padic_val_nat_of_dvd one_le_padicValNat_of_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_padicValNat_ne_zero {p n : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hn0 : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ padicValNat p n ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun h => one_le_iff_ne_zero.mp (one_le_padicValNat_of_dvd hn0.bot_lt h), fun h =>
Classical.not_not.1 (mt padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd h)⟩
#align dvd_iff_padic_val_nat_ne_zero dvd_iff_padicValNat_ne_zero
open List
theorem le_multiplicity_iff_replicate_subperm_factors {a b : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (ha : a.Prime)
(hb : b ≠ 0) :
↑n ≤ multiplicity a b ↔ replicate n a <+~ b.factors :=
(replicate_subperm_factors_iff ha hb).trans multiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity |>.symm
theorem le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors {a b : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (ha : a.Prime)
(hb : b ≠ 0) :
n ≤ padicValNat a b ↔ replicate n a <+~ b.factors := by
rw [← le_multiplicity_iff_replicate_subperm_factors ha hb,
← padicValNat_def' ha.ne_one (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb), Nat.cast_le]
end padicValNat
namespace padicValRat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- The multiplicity of `p : ℕ` in `a : ℤ` is finite exactly when `a ≠ 0`. -/
theorem finite_int_prime_iff {a : ℤ} : Finite (p : ℤ) a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
simp [finite_int_iff, hp.1.ne_one]
#align padic_val_rat.finite_int_prime_iff padicValRat.finite_int_prime_iff
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p q` when `q` is expressed in terms of `Rat.mk`. -/
protected theorem defn (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hqz : q ≠ 0)
(qdf : q = n /. d) :
padicValRat p q =
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) n).get
(finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, fun hn => by simp_all⟩) -
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) d).get
(finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, fun hd => by simp_all⟩) := by
have hd : d ≠ 0 := Rat.mk_denom_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hqz qdf
let ⟨c, hc1, hc2⟩ := Rat.num_den_mk hd qdf
rw [padicValRat.multiplicity_sub_multiplicity hp.1.ne_one hqz]
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff, hc1, hc2]
rw [multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1),
multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1)]
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add]
simp_rw [Int.natCast_multiplicity p q.den]
ring
-- Porting note: was
-- simp only [hc1, hc2, multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1),
-- hp.1.ne_one, hqz, pos_iff_ne_zero, Int.natCast_multiplicity p q.den
#align padic_val_rat.defn padicValRat.defn
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p (q * r)` with conditions `q ≠ 0`, `r ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem mul {q r : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (q * r) = padicValRat p q + padicValRat p r := by
have : q * r = (q.num * r.num) /. (q.den * r.den) := by
rw [Rat.mul_eq_mkRat, Rat.mkRat_eq_divInt, Nat.cast_mul]
have hq' : q.num /. q.den ≠ 0 := by rwa [Rat.num_divInt_den]
have hr' : r.num /. r.den ≠ 0 := by rwa [Rat.num_divInt_den]
have hp' : Prime (p : ℤ) := Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1
rw [padicValRat.defn p (mul_ne_zero hq hr) this]
conv_rhs =>
rw [← q.num_divInt_den, padicValRat.defn p hq', ← r.num_divInt_den, padicValRat.defn p hr']
rw [multiplicity.mul' hp', multiplicity.mul' hp', Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add]
ring
-- Porting note: was
-- simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align padic_val_rat.mul padicValRat.mul
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p (q^k)` with condition `q ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem pow {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) {k : ℕ} :
padicValRat p (q ^ k) = k * padicValRat p q := by
induction k <;>
simp [*, padicValRat.mul hq (pow_ne_zero _ hq), _root_.pow_succ', add_mul, add_comm]
#align padic_val_rat.pow padicValRat.pow
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p (q⁻¹)` with condition `q ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem inv (q : ℚ) : padicValRat p q⁻¹ = -padicValRat p q := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
· rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← padicValRat.mul (inv_ne_zero hq) hq, inv_mul_cancel hq,
padicValRat.one]
#align padic_val_rat.inv padicValRat.inv
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p (q / r)` with conditions `q ≠ 0`, `r ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem div {q r : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (q / r) = padicValRat p q - padicValRat p r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, padicValRat.mul hq (inv_ne_zero hr), padicValRat.inv r, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align padic_val_rat.div padicValRat.div
/-- A condition for `padicValRat p (n₁ / d₁) ≤ padicValRat p (n₂ / d₂)`, in terms of
divisibility by `p^n`. -/
theorem padicValRat_le_padicValRat_iff {n₁ n₂ d₁ d₂ : ℤ} (hn₁ : n₁ ≠ 0) (hn₂ : n₂ ≠ 0)
(hd₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (hd₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (n₁ /. d₁) ≤ padicValRat p (n₂ /. d₂) ↔
∀ n : ℕ, (p : ℤ) ^ n ∣ n₁ * d₂ → (p : ℤ) ^ n ∣ n₂ * d₁ := by
have hf1 : Finite (p : ℤ) (n₁ * d₂) := finite_int_prime_iff.2 (mul_ne_zero hn₁ hd₂)
have hf2 : Finite (p : ℤ) (n₂ * d₁) := finite_int_prime_iff.2 (mul_ne_zero hn₂ hd₁)
conv =>
lhs
rw [padicValRat.defn p (Rat.divInt_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hn₁ hd₁) rfl,
padicValRat.defn p (Rat.divInt_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hn₂ hd₂) rfl, sub_le_iff_le_add', ←
add_sub_assoc, _root_.le_sub_iff_add_le]
norm_cast
rw [← multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1) hf1, add_comm, ←
multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1) hf2, PartENat.get_le_get,
multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff]
#align padic_val_rat.padic_val_rat_le_padic_val_rat_iff padicValRat.padicValRat_le_padicValRat_iff
/-- Sufficient conditions to show that the `p`-adic valuation of `q` is less than or equal to the
`p`-adic valuation of `q + r`. -/
theorem le_padicValRat_add_of_le {q r : ℚ} (hqr : q + r ≠ 0)
(h : padicValRat p q ≤ padicValRat p r) : padicValRat p q ≤ padicValRat p (q + r) :=
if hq : q = 0 then by simpa [hq] using h
else
if hr : r = 0 then by simp [hr]
else by
have hqn : q.num ≠ 0 := Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hq
have hqd : (q.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Rat.den_nz _
have hrn : r.num ≠ 0 := Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hr
have hrd : (r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Rat.den_nz _
have hqreq : q + r = (q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num) /. (q.den * r.den) := Rat.add_num_den _ _
have hqrd : q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num ≠ 0 := Rat.mk_num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hqr hqreq
conv_lhs => rw [← q.num_divInt_den]
rw [hqreq, padicValRat_le_padicValRat_iff hqn hqrd hqd (mul_ne_zero hqd hrd), ←
multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff, mul_left_comm,
multiplicity.mul (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), add_mul]
rw [← q.num_divInt_den, ← r.num_divInt_den, padicValRat_le_padicValRat_iff hqn hrn hqd hrd, ←
multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff] at h
calc
_ ≤
min (multiplicity (↑p) (q.num * r.den * q.den))
(multiplicity (↑p) (↑q.den * r.num * ↑q.den)) :=
le_min
(by rw [@multiplicity.mul _ _ _ _ (_ * _) _ (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), add_comm])
(by
rw [mul_assoc,
@multiplicity.mul _ _ _ _ (q.den : ℤ) (_ * _)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1)]
exact add_le_add_left h _)
_ ≤ _ := min_le_multiplicity_add
#align padic_val_rat.le_padic_val_rat_add_of_le padicValRat.le_padicValRat_add_of_le
/-- The minimum of the valuations of `q` and `r` is at most the valuation of `q + r`. -/
theorem min_le_padicValRat_add {q r : ℚ} (hqr : q + r ≠ 0) :
min (padicValRat p q) (padicValRat p r) ≤ padicValRat p (q + r) :=
(le_total (padicValRat p q) (padicValRat p r)).elim
(fun h => by rw [min_eq_left h]; exact le_padicValRat_add_of_le hqr h)
(fun h => by rw [min_eq_right h, add_comm]; exact le_padicValRat_add_of_le (by rwa [add_comm]) h)
#align padic_val_rat.min_le_padic_val_rat_add padicValRat.min_le_padicValRat_add
/-- Ultrametric property of a p-adic valuation. -/
lemma add_eq_min {q r : ℚ} (hqr : q + r ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0)
(hval : padicValRat p q ≠ padicValRat p r) :
padicValRat p (q + r) = min (padicValRat p q) (padicValRat p r) := by
have h1 := min_le_padicValRat_add (p := p) hqr
have h2 := min_le_padicValRat_add (p := p) (ne_of_eq_of_ne (add_neg_cancel_right q r) hq)
have h3 := min_le_padicValRat_add (p := p) (ne_of_eq_of_ne (add_neg_cancel_right r q) hr)
rw [add_neg_cancel_right, padicValRat.neg] at h2 h3
rw [add_comm] at h3
refine le_antisymm (le_min ?_ ?_) h1
· contrapose! h2
rw [min_eq_right h2.le] at h3
exact lt_min h2 (lt_of_le_of_ne h3 hval)
· contrapose! h3
rw [min_eq_right h3.le] at h2
exact lt_min h3 (lt_of_le_of_ne h2 hval.symm)
lemma add_eq_of_lt {q r : ℚ} (hqr : q + r ≠ 0)
(hq : q ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) (hval : padicValRat p q < padicValRat p r) :
padicValRat p (q + r) = padicValRat p q := by
rw [add_eq_min hqr hq hr (ne_of_lt hval), min_eq_left (le_of_lt hval)]
lemma lt_add_of_lt {q r₁ r₂ : ℚ} (hqr : r₁ + r₂ ≠ 0)
(hval₁ : padicValRat p q < padicValRat p r₁) (hval₂ : padicValRat p q < padicValRat p r₂) :
padicValRat p q < padicValRat p (r₁ + r₂) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_min hval₁ hval₂) (padicValRat.min_le_padicValRat_add hqr)
@[simp]
lemma self_pow_inv (r : ℕ) : padicValRat p ((p : ℚ) ^ r)⁻¹ = -r := by
rw [padicValRat.inv, neg_inj, padicValRat.pow (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hp.elim.ne_zero),
padicValRat.self hp.elim.one_lt, mul_one]
/-- A finite sum of rationals with positive `p`-adic valuation has positive `p`-adic valuation
(if the sum is non-zero). -/
theorem sum_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} {F : ℕ → ℚ} (hF : ∀ i, i < n → 0 < padicValRat p (F i))
(hn0 : ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, F i ≠ 0) : 0 < padicValRat p (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, F i) := by
induction' n with d hd
· exact False.elim (hn0 rfl)
· rw [Finset.sum_range_succ] at hn0 ⊢
by_cases h : ∑ x ∈ Finset.range d, F x = 0
· rw [h, zero_add]
exact hF d (lt_add_one _)
· refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (min_le_padicValRat_add hn0)
refine lt_min (hd (fun i hi => ?_) h) (hF d (lt_add_one _))
exact hF _ (lt_trans hi (lt_add_one _))
#align padic_val_rat.sum_pos_of_pos padicValRat.sum_pos_of_pos
/-- If the p-adic valuation of a finite set of positive rationals is greater than a given rational
number, then the p-adic valuation of their sum is also greater than the same rational number. -/
theorem lt_sum_of_lt {p j : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] {F : ℕ → ℚ} {S : Finset ℕ}
(hS : S.Nonempty) (hF : ∀ i, i ∈ S → padicValRat p (F j) < padicValRat p (F i))
(hn1 : ∀ i : ℕ, 0 < F i) : padicValRat p (F j) < padicValRat p (∑ i ∈ S, F i) := by
induction' hS using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with k s S' Hnot Hne Hind
· rw [Finset.sum_singleton]
exact hF k (by simp)
· rw [Finset.cons_eq_insert, Finset.sum_insert Hnot]
exact padicValRat.lt_add_of_lt
(ne_of_gt (add_pos (hn1 s) (Finset.sum_pos (fun i _ => hn1 i) Hne)))
(hF _ (by simp [Finset.mem_insert, true_or]))
(Hind (fun i hi => hF _ (by rw [Finset.cons_eq_insert,Finset.mem_insert]; exact Or.inr hi)))
end padicValRat
namespace padicValNat
variable {p a b : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValNat p (a * b)` with conditions `a ≠ 0`, `b ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem mul : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → padicValNat p (a * b) = padicValNat p a + padicValNat p b :=
mod_cast @padicValRat.mul p _ a b
#align padic_val_nat.mul padicValNat.mul
protected theorem div_of_dvd (h : b ∣ a) :
padicValNat p (a / b) = padicValNat p a - padicValNat p b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := h
obtain ⟨hb, hk⟩ := mul_ne_zero_iff.mp ha
rw [mul_comm, k.mul_div_cancel hb.bot_lt, padicValNat.mul hk hb, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align padic_val_nat.div_of_dvd padicValNat.div_of_dvd
/-- Dividing out by a prime factor reduces the `padicValNat` by `1`. -/
protected theorem div (dvd : p ∣ b) : padicValNat p (b / p) = padicValNat p b - 1 := by
rw [padicValNat.div_of_dvd dvd, padicValNat_self]
#align padic_val_nat.div padicValNat.div
/-- A version of `padicValRat.pow` for `padicValNat`. -/
protected theorem pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : padicValNat p (a ^ n) = n * padicValNat p a := by
simpa only [← @Nat.cast_inj ℤ, push_cast] using padicValRat.pow (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr ha)
#align padic_val_nat.pow padicValNat.pow
@[simp]
protected theorem prime_pow (n : ℕ) : padicValNat p (p ^ n) = n := by
rw [padicValNat.pow _ (@Fact.out p.Prime).ne_zero, padicValNat_self, mul_one]
#align padic_val_nat.prime_pow padicValNat.prime_pow
protected theorem div_pow (dvd : p ^ a ∣ b) : padicValNat p (b / p ^ a) = padicValNat p b - a := by
rw [padicValNat.div_of_dvd dvd, padicValNat.prime_pow]
#align padic_val_nat.div_pow padicValNat.div_pow
protected theorem div' {m : ℕ} (cpm : Coprime p m) {b : ℕ} (dvd : m ∣ b) :
padicValNat p (b / m) = padicValNat p b := by
rw [padicValNat.div_of_dvd dvd, eq_zero_of_not_dvd (hp.out.coprime_iff_not_dvd.mp cpm),
Nat.sub_zero]
#align padic_val_nat.div' padicValNat.div'
end padicValNat
section padicValNat
variable {p : ℕ}
theorem dvd_of_one_le_padicValNat {n : ℕ} (hp : 1 ≤ padicValNat p n) : p ∣ n := by
by_contra h
rw [padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd h] at hp
exact lt_irrefl 0 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp)
#align dvd_of_one_le_padic_val_nat dvd_of_one_le_padicValNat
theorem pow_padicValNat_dvd {n : ℕ} : p ^ padicValNat p n ∣ n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn); · simp
rcases eq_or_ne p 1 with (rfl | hp); · simp
rw [multiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, padicValNat_def'] <;> assumption
#align pow_padic_val_nat_dvd pow_padicValNat_dvd
theorem padicValNat_dvd_iff_le [hp : Fact p.Prime] {a n : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
p ^ n ∣ a ↔ n ≤ padicValNat p a := by
rw [pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, ← padicValNat_def' hp.out.ne_one ha.bot_lt, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
#align padic_val_nat_dvd_iff_le padicValNat_dvd_iff_le
theorem padicValNat_dvd_iff (n : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℕ) :
p ^ n ∣ a ↔ a = 0 ∨ n ≤ padicValNat p a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact iff_of_true (dvd_zero _) (Or.inl rfl)
· rw [padicValNat_dvd_iff_le ha, or_iff_right ha]
#align padic_val_nat_dvd_iff padicValNat_dvd_iff
theorem pow_succ_padicValNat_not_dvd {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
¬p ^ (padicValNat p n + 1) ∣ n := by
rw [padicValNat_dvd_iff_le hn, not_le]
exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align pow_succ_padic_val_nat_not_dvd pow_succ_padicValNat_not_dvd
theorem padicValNat_primes {q : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [hq : Fact q.Prime] (neq : p ≠ q) :
padicValNat p q = 0 :=
@padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd p q <|
(not_congr (Iff.symm (prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq hp.1 hq.1))).mp neq
#align padic_val_nat_primes padicValNat_primes
theorem padicValNat_prime_prime_pow {q : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [hq : Fact q.Prime]
(n : ℕ) (neq : p ≠ q) : padicValNat p (q ^ n) = 0 := by
rw [padicValNat.pow _ <| Nat.Prime.ne_zero hq.elim, padicValNat_primes neq, mul_zero]
theorem padicValNat_mul_pow_left {q : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [hq : Fact q.Prime]
(n m : ℕ) (neq : p ≠ q) : padicValNat p (p^n * q^m) = n := by
rw [padicValNat.mul (NeZero.ne' (p^n)).symm (NeZero.ne' (q^m)).symm,
padicValNat.prime_pow, padicValNat_prime_prime_pow m neq, add_zero]
theorem padicValNat_mul_pow_right {q : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [hq : Fact q.Prime]
(n m : ℕ) (neq : q ≠ p) : padicValNat q (p^n * q^m) = m := by
rw [mul_comm (p^n) (q^m)]
exact padicValNat_mul_pow_left m n neq
/-- The p-adic valuation of `n` is less than or equal to its logarithm w.r.t `p`. -/
lemma padicValNat_le_nat_log (n : ℕ) : padicValNat p n ≤ Nat.log p n := by
rcases n with _ | n
· simp
rcases p with _ | _ | p
· simp
· simp
exact Nat.le_log_of_pow_le p.one_lt_succ_succ (le_of_dvd n.succ_pos pow_padicValNat_dvd)
/-- The p-adic valuation of `n` is equal to the logarithm w.r.t `p` iff
`n` is less than `p` raised to one plus the p-adic valuation of `n`. -/
lemma nat_log_eq_padicValNat_iff {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.log p n = padicValNat p n ↔ n < p ^ (padicValNat p n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.log_eq_iff (Or.inr ⟨(Nat.Prime.one_lt' p).out, by omega⟩), and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => Nat.le_of_dvd hn pow_padicValNat_dvd
lemma Nat.log_ne_padicValNat_succ {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : log 2 n ≠ padicValNat 2 (n + 1) := by
rw [Ne, log_eq_iff (by simp [hn])]
rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩
rw [← lt_add_one_iff, ← mul_one (2 ^ _)] at h1
rw [← add_one_le_iff, Nat.pow_succ] at h2
refine not_dvd_of_between_consec_multiples h1 (lt_of_le_of_ne' h2 ?_) pow_padicValNat_dvd
-- TODO(kmill): Why is this `p := 2` necessary?
exact pow_succ_padicValNat_not_dvd (p := 2) n.succ_ne_zero ∘ dvd_of_eq
lemma Nat.max_log_padicValNat_succ_eq_log_succ (n : ℕ) :
max (log 2 n) (padicValNat 2 (n + 1)) = log 2 (n + 1) := by
apply le_antisymm (max_le (le_log_of_pow_le one_lt_two (pow_log_le_add_one 2 n))
(padicValNat_le_nat_log (n + 1)))
rw [le_max_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, not_le]
intro h
replace h := le_antisymm (add_one_le_iff.mpr (lt_pow_of_log_lt one_lt_two h))
(pow_log_le_self 2 n.succ_ne_zero)
rw [h, padicValNat.prime_pow, ← h]
theorem range_pow_padicValNat_subset_divisors {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(Finset.range (padicValNat p n + 1)).image (p ^ ·) ⊆ n.divisors := by
intro t ht
simp only [exists_prop, Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_range] at ht
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [Nat.mem_divisors]
exact ⟨(pow_dvd_pow p <| by omega).trans pow_padicValNat_dvd, hn⟩
#align range_pow_padic_val_nat_subset_divisors range_pow_padicValNat_subset_divisors
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicVal.lean | 658 | 667 | theorem range_pow_padicValNat_subset_divisors' {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] :
((Finset.range (padicValNat p n)).image fun t => p ^ (t + 1)) ⊆ n.divisors.erase 1 := by |
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
intro t ht
simp only [exists_prop, Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_range] at ht
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Nat.mem_divisors]
refine ⟨?_, (pow_dvd_pow p <| succ_le_iff.2 hk).trans pow_padicValNat_dvd, hn⟩
exact (Nat.one_lt_pow k.succ_ne_zero hp.out.one_lt).ne'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
#align real.angle.sin_coe_pi Real.Angle.sin_coe_pi
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
#align real.angle.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
#align real.angle.sin_neg Real.Angle.sin_neg
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.sin_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sin_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi Real.Angle.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
#align real.angle.cos_zero Real.Angle.cos_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
#align real.angle.cos_coe_pi Real.Angle.cos_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
#align real.angle.cos_neg Real.Angle.cos_neg
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.cos_antiperiodic Real.Angle.cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi Real.Angle.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 427 | 428 | theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by |
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
#align_import measure_theory.group.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Measure theory in the product of groups
In this file we show properties about measure theory in products of measurable groups
and properties of iterated integrals in measurable groups.
These lemmas show the uniqueness of left invariant measures on measurable groups, up to
scaling. In this file we follow the proof and refer to the book *Measure Theory* by Paul Halmos.
The idea of the proof is to use the translation invariance of measures to prove `μ(t) = c * μ(s)`
for two sets `s` and `t`, where `c` is a constant that does not depend on `μ`. Let `e` and `f` be
the characteristic functions of `s` and `t`.
Assume that `μ` and `ν` are left-invariant measures. Then the map `(x, y) ↦ (y * x, x⁻¹)`
preserves the measure `μ × ν`, which means that
```
∫ x, ∫ y, h x y ∂ν ∂μ = ∫ x, ∫ y, h (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ
```
If we apply this to `h x y := e x * f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun h ↦ h * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)`, we can rewrite the RHS to
`μ(t)`, and the LHS to `c * μ(s)`, where `c = c(ν)` does not depend on `μ`.
Applying this to `μ` and to `ν` gives `μ (t) / μ (s) = ν (t) / ν (s)`, which is the uniqueness up to
scalar multiplication.
The proof in [Halmos] seems to contain an omission in §60 Th. A, see
`MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure`.
Note that this theory only applies in measurable groups, i.e., when multiplication and inversion
are measurable. This is not the case in general in locally compact groups, or even in compact
groups, when the topology is not second-countable. For arguments along the same line, but using
continuous functions instead of measurable sets and working in the general locally compact
setting, see the file `MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding prod_eq
open Function MeasureTheory
open Filter hiding map
open scoped Classical ENNReal Pointwise MeasureTheory
variable (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul₂ G]
variable (μ ν : Measure G) [SigmaFinite ν] [SigmaFinite μ] {s : Set G}
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk measurable_mul
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd }
#align measurable_equiv.shear_mul_right MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight
#align measurable_equiv.shear_add_right MeasurableEquiv.shearAddRight
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, yx)` -/
@[to_additive
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, y + x)`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.divRight with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_snd.div measurable_fst
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst }
#align measurable_equiv.shear_div_right MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight
#align measurable_equiv.shear_sub_right MeasurableEquiv.shearSubRight
variable {G}
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure
section LeftInvariant
/-- The multiplicative shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`.
This condition is part of the definition of a measurable group in [Halmos, §59].
There, the map in this lemma is called `S`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add
" The shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(MeasurePreserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul <|
Filter.eventually_of_forall <| map_mul_left_eq_self ν
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_mul MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_mul
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_add MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_add
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, yx)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the map `SR` in [Halmos, §59].
`S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y + x)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_mul_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_add_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_measure_mul_right (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => μ ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) := by
suffices
Measurable fun y =>
μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((fun z : G × G => ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' univ ×ˢ s))
by convert this using 1; ext1 x; congr 1 with y : 1; simp
apply measurable_measure_prod_mk_right
apply measurable_const.prod_mk measurable_mul (MeasurableSet.univ.prod hs)
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.measurable_measure_mul_right MeasureTheory.measurable_measure_mul_right
#align measure_theory.measurable_measure_add_right MeasureTheory.measurable_measure_add_right
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x⁻¹y)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, - x + y)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul μ ν).symm <| MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight G
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_inv_mul MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_neg_add MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
variable [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y⁻¹x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the function `S⁻¹R` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, - y + x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_inv_mul_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_neg_add_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (yx, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹RSR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y + x, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_mul_prod_inv MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_add_prod_neg MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv : QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_inv, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hsm hμs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage]
have hf : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_fst.inv
suffices map (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0 by
simpa only [(measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ μ).map_eq, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞),
or_self_iff] using this
have hsm' : MeasurableSet (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (μ := μ) (ν := μ) (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage,
mk_preimage_prod, inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null inter_subset_right hμs,
lintegral_zero]
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_inv MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_inv
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_neg MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_inv_null : μ s⁻¹ = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs => ?_, (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null⟩
rw [← inv_inv s]
exact (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null hs
#align measure_theory.measure_inv_null MeasureTheory.measure_inv_null
#align measure_theory.measure_neg_null MeasureTheory.measure_neg_null
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_absolutelyContinuous : μ.inv ≪ μ :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.inv_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.inv_absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.neg_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.neg_absolutelyContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_inv : μ ≪ μ.inv := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s _ => ?_
simp_rw [inv_apply μ s, measure_inv_null, imp_self]
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_inv MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_inv
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_neg MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (f : G → G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : AEMeasurable (uncurry f) (μ.prod ν)) :
(∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν ∂μ := by
have h : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_fst.inv
have h2f : AEMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => f (y * x) x⁻¹) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).quasiMeasurePreserving
simp_rw [lintegral_lintegral h2f, lintegral_lintegral hf]
conv_rhs => rw [← (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq]
symm
exact
lintegral_map' (hf.mono' (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq.absolutelyContinuous)
h.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_add_neg MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_add_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_null (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
calc
μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ ((fun x => y⁻¹ * x) ⁻¹' s⁻¹)⁻¹ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
_ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [measure_inv_null μ, measure_preimage_mul]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_right_null MeasureTheory.measure_mul_right_null
#align measure_theory.measure_add_right_null MeasureTheory.measure_add_right_null
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_ne_zero (h2s : μ s ≠ 0) (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr (measure_mul_right_null μ y)).mpr h2s
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_right_ne_zero MeasureTheory.measure_mul_right_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.measure_add_right_ne_zero MeasureTheory.measure_add_right_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right (g : G) : μ ≪ map (· * g) μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => ?_
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null]; exact id
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_mul_right MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_add_right MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left (g : G) : μ ≪ map (fun h => g / h) μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
erw [← map_map (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv]
conv_lhs => rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
exact (absolutelyContinuous_inv μ).map (measurable_const_mul g)
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_div_left MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_sub_left MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_sub_left
/-- This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. -/
@[to_additive "This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]."]
theorem measure_mul_lintegral_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : Measurable f) : (μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, ν ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s) * f x⁻¹ ∂μ := by
rw [← set_lintegral_one, ← lintegral_indicator _ sm,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul (measurable_const.indicator sm).aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv μ ν]
swap
· exact (((measurable_const.indicator sm).comp measurable_fst).mul
(hf.comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable
have ms :
∀ x : G, Measurable fun y => ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) y :=
fun x => measurable_const.indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm)
have : ∀ x y, s.indicator (fun _ : G => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (y * x) =
((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun b : G => 1) y := by
intro x y; symm; convert indicator_comp_right (M := ℝ≥0∞) fun y => y * x using 2; ext1; rfl
simp_rw [this, lintegral_mul_const _ (ms _), lintegral_indicator _ (measurable_mul_const _ sm),
set_lintegral_one]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.measure_mul_lintegral_eq
#align measure_theory.measure_add_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.measure_add_lintegral_eq
/-- Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. -/
@[to_additive
" Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. "]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (hν : ν ≠ 0) : μ ≪ ν := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s sm hνs => ?_
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm 1 measurable_one
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, lintegral_one, mul_one, (measure_mul_right_null ν _).mpr hνs,
lintegral_zero, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞), measure_univ_eq_zero.not.mpr hν, or_false_iff] at h1
exact h1
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_of_is_mul_left_invariant MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_of_is_add_left_invariant MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_of_isAddLeftInvariant
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ν ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
refine ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict' ν.inv _ ?_
intro A hA _ h3A
simp only [ν.inv_apply] at h3A
apply ae_lt_top (measurable_measure_mul_right ν sm)
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm (A⁻¹.indicator 1) (measurable_one.indicator hA.inv)
rw [lintegral_indicator _ hA.inv] at h1
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, set_lintegral_one, ← image_inv, indicator_image inv_injective, image_inv, ←
indicator_mul_right _ fun x => ν ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s), Function.comp, Pi.one_apply,
mul_one] at h1
rw [← lintegral_indicator _ hA, ← h1]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top hμs h3A.ne
#align measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top
#align measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero [IsMulLeftInvariant ν]
(sm : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : ν s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ν ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top ν ν sm h3s).filter_mono ?_
refine (absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant μ ν ?_).ae_le
refine mt ?_ h2s
intro hν
rw [hν, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
#align measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero
/-- A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A].
Note that if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `t` this states that
`μ t = c * μ s` for a constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos].
In the last line, the equality `g(x⁻¹)ν(sx⁻¹) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that
`0 < ν(sx⁻¹) < ∞`. The first inequality follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is
not justified. We prove this inequality for almost all `x` in
`MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`. -/
@[to_additive
"A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. Note that
if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `t` this states that `μ t = c * μ s` for a
constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos]. In the last line, the equality
`g(-x) + ν(s - x) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that `0 < ν(s - x) < ∞`. The first inequality
follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is not justified. We prove this inequality for
almost all `x` in `MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`."]
theorem measure_lintegral_div_measure [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : ν s ≠ 0)
(h3s : ν s ≠ ∞) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun x => x * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s) ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
set g := fun y => f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun x => x * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)
have hg : Measurable g :=
(hf.comp measurable_inv).div ((measurable_measure_mul_right ν sm).comp measurable_inv)
simp_rw [measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm g hg, g, inv_inv]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero μ ν sm h2s h3s).mono fun x hx => ?_
simp_rw [ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' (measure_mul_right_ne_zero ν h2s _) hx.ne]
#align measure_theory.measure_lintegral_div_measure MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure
#align measure_theory.measure_lintegral_sub_measure MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_sub_measure
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_measure_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] {s t : Set G} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h2s : ν s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν s ≠ ∞) : μ s * ν t = ν s * μ t := by
have h1 :=
measure_lintegral_div_measure ν ν hs h2s h3s (t.indicator fun _ => 1)
(measurable_const.indicator ht)
have h2 :=
measure_lintegral_div_measure μ ν hs h2s h3s (t.indicator fun _ => 1)
(measurable_const.indicator ht)
rw [lintegral_indicator _ ht, set_lintegral_one] at h1 h2
rw [← h1, mul_left_comm, h2]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_measure_eq MeasureTheory.measure_mul_measure_eq
#align measure_theory.measure_add_measure_eq MeasureTheory.measure_add_measure_eq
/-- Left invariant Borel measures on a measurable group are unique (up to a scalar). -/
@[to_additive
" Left invariant Borel measures on an additive measurable group are unique (up to a scalar). "]
theorem measure_eq_div_smul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : ν s ≠ 0)
(h3s : ν s ≠ ∞) : μ = (μ s / ν s) • ν := by
ext1 t ht
rw [smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm,
measure_mul_measure_eq μ ν hs ht h2s h3s, mul_div_assoc, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' h2s h3s]
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_div_smul MeasureTheory.measure_eq_div_smul
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_sub_vadd MeasureTheory.measure_eq_sub_vadd
end LeftInvariant
section RightInvariant
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_right]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_right [IsMulRightInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
MeasurePreserving.skew_product (g := fun x y => y * x) (MeasurePreserving.id μ)
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst) <| Filter.eventually_of_forall <| map_mul_right_eq_self ν
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_mul_right MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_mul_right
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_add_right MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_add_right
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, xy)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap_right
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, x + y)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap_right [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul_right ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_mul_swap_right MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap_right
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_add_swap_right MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_add_swap_right
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (xy, y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (x + y, y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1 * z.2, z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
measurePreserving_swap.comp <| by apply measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap_right μ ν
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_mul_prod MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_mul_prod
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_add_prod MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_add_prod
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` is measure-preserving. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_sub "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_div [IsMulRightInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.2 / z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul_right μ ν).symm (MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight G).symm
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_div MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_div
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_sub MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_sub
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, x / y)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_sub_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, x - y)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_div_swap [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.1 / z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_div ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_div_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_div_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_sub_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_sub_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x / y, y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_sub_prod
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (x - y, y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_div_prod [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1 / z.2, z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
measurePreserving_swap.comp <| by apply measurePreserving_prod_div_swap μ ν
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_div_prod MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_div_prod
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_sub_prod MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_sub_prod
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (xy, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg_right
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x + y, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv_right [IsMulRightInvariant μ] [IsMulRightInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1 * z.2, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_div_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap_right μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, div_mul_eq_div_div_swap, div_self', one_div]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_mul_prod_inv_right MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv_right
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_add_prod_neg_right MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_add_prod_neg_right
end RightInvariant
section QuasiMeasurePreserving
variable [MeasurableInv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv_of_right_invariant [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
rw [← μ.inv_inv]
exact
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ.inv).mono (inv_absolutelyContinuous μ.inv)
(absolutelyContinuous_inv μ.inv)
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_inv_of_right_invariant MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_inv_of_right_invariant
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_neg_of_right_invariant MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_neg_of_right_invariant
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_div_left [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] (g : G) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun h : G => g / h) μ μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact
(measurePreserving_mul_left μ g).quasiMeasurePreserving.comp (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ)
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_div_left MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_div_left
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_sub_left MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_div_left_of_right_invariant [IsMulRightInvariant μ] (g : G) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun h : G => g / h) μ μ := by
rw [← μ.inv_inv]
exact
(quasiMeasurePreserving_div_left μ.inv g).mono (inv_absolutelyContinuous μ.inv)
(absolutelyContinuous_inv μ.inv)
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_div_left_of_right_invariant MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_div_left_of_right_invariant
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Prod.lean | 469 | 472 | theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_div_of_right_invariant [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun p : G × G => p.1 / p.2) (μ.prod ν) μ := by |
refine QuasiMeasurePreserving.prod_of_left measurable_div (eventually_of_forall fun y => ?_)
exact (measurePreserving_div_right μ y).quasiMeasurePreserving
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.inverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open Set Filter
open Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
#align real.arcsin Real.arcsin
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arcsin_mem_Icc Real.arcsin_mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
#align real.range_arcsin Real.range_arcsin
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
#align real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
#align real.arcsin_proj_Icc Real.arcsin_projIcc
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 64 | 66 | theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by |
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Translations
#align_import algebra.continued_fractions.computation.translations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Basic Translation Lemmas Between Structures Defined for Computing Continued Fractions
## Summary
This is a collection of simple lemmas between the different structures used for the computation
of continued fractions defined in `Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Basic`. The file consists
of three sections:
1. Recurrences and inversion lemmas for `IntFractPair.stream`: these lemmas give us inversion
rules and recurrences for the computation of the stream of integer and fractional parts of
a value.
2. Translation lemmas for the head term: these lemmas show us that the head term of the computed
continued fraction of a value `v` is `⌊v⌋` and how this head term is moved along the structures
used in the computation process.
3. Translation lemmas for the sequence: these lemmas show how the sequences of the involved
structures (`IntFractPair.stream`, `IntFractPair.seq1`, and
`GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of`) are connected, i.e. how the values are moved along the
structures and the termination of one sequence implies the termination of another sequence.
## Main Theorems
- `succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff` gives as a recurrence to compute the `n + 1`th value of the sequence
of integer and fractional parts of a value in case of non-termination.
- `succ_nth_stream_eq_none_iff` gives as a recurrence to compute the `n + 1`th value of the sequence
of integer and fractional parts of a value in case of termination.
- `get?_of_eq_some_of_succ_get?_intFractPair_stream` and
`get?_of_eq_some_of_get?_intFractPair_stream_fr_ne_zero` show how the entries of the sequence
of the computed continued fraction can be obtained from the stream of integer and fractional
parts.
-/
namespace GeneralizedContinuedFraction
open GeneralizedContinuedFraction (of)
-- Fix a discrete linear ordered floor field and a value `v`.
variable {K : Type*} [LinearOrderedField K] [FloorRing K] {v : K}
namespace IntFractPair
/-!
### Recurrences and Inversion Lemmas for `IntFractPair.stream`
Here we state some lemmas that give us inversion rules and recurrences for the computation of the
stream of integer and fractional parts of a value.
-/
theorem stream_zero (v : K) : IntFractPair.stream v 0 = some (IntFractPair.of v) :=
rfl
#align generalized_continued_fraction.int_fract_pair.stream_zero GeneralizedContinuedFraction.IntFractPair.stream_zero
variable {n : ℕ}
theorem stream_eq_none_of_fr_eq_zero {ifp_n : IntFractPair K}
(stream_nth_eq : IntFractPair.stream v n = some ifp_n) (nth_fr_eq_zero : ifp_n.fr = 0) :
IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = none := by
cases' ifp_n with _ fr
change fr = 0 at nth_fr_eq_zero
simp [IntFractPair.stream, stream_nth_eq, nth_fr_eq_zero]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.int_fract_pair.stream_eq_none_of_fr_eq_zero GeneralizedContinuedFraction.IntFractPair.stream_eq_none_of_fr_eq_zero
/-- Gives a recurrence to compute the `n + 1`th value of the sequence of integer and fractional
parts of a value in case of termination.
-/
theorem succ_nth_stream_eq_none_iff :
IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = none ↔
IntFractPair.stream v n = none ∨ ∃ ifp, IntFractPair.stream v n = some ifp ∧ ifp.fr = 0 := by
rw [IntFractPair.stream]
cases IntFractPair.stream v n <;> simp [imp_false]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.int_fract_pair.succ_nth_stream_eq_none_iff GeneralizedContinuedFraction.IntFractPair.succ_nth_stream_eq_none_iff
/-- Gives a recurrence to compute the `n + 1`th value of the sequence of integer and fractional
parts of a value in case of non-termination.
-/
theorem succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff {ifp_succ_n : IntFractPair K} :
IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = some ifp_succ_n ↔
∃ ifp_n : IntFractPair K,
IntFractPair.stream v n = some ifp_n ∧
ifp_n.fr ≠ 0 ∧ IntFractPair.of ifp_n.fr⁻¹ = ifp_succ_n := by
simp [IntFractPair.stream, ite_eq_iff, Option.bind_eq_some]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.int_fract_pair.succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff GeneralizedContinuedFraction.IntFractPair.succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff
/-- An easier to use version of one direction of
`GeneralizedContinuedFraction.IntFractPair.succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff`.
-/
theorem stream_succ_of_some {p : IntFractPair K} (h : IntFractPair.stream v n = some p)
(h' : p.fr ≠ 0) : IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = some (IntFractPair.of p.fr⁻¹) :=
succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff.mpr ⟨p, h, h', rfl⟩
#align generalized_continued_fraction.int_fract_pair.stream_succ_of_some GeneralizedContinuedFraction.IntFractPair.stream_succ_of_some
/-- The stream of `IntFractPair`s of an integer stops after the first term.
-/
theorem stream_succ_of_int (a : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : IntFractPair.stream (a : K) (n + 1) = none := by
induction' n with n ih
· refine IntFractPair.stream_eq_none_of_fr_eq_zero (IntFractPair.stream_zero (a : K)) ?_
simp only [IntFractPair.of, Int.fract_intCast]
· exact IntFractPair.succ_nth_stream_eq_none_iff.mpr (Or.inl ih)
#align generalized_continued_fraction.int_fract_pair.stream_succ_of_int GeneralizedContinuedFraction.IntFractPair.stream_succ_of_int
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/Computation/Translations.lean | 112 | 121 | theorem exists_succ_nth_stream_of_fr_zero {ifp_succ_n : IntFractPair K}
(stream_succ_nth_eq : IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = some ifp_succ_n)
(succ_nth_fr_eq_zero : ifp_succ_n.fr = 0) :
∃ ifp_n : IntFractPair K, IntFractPair.stream v n = some ifp_n ∧ ifp_n.fr⁻¹ = ⌊ifp_n.fr⁻¹⌋ := by |
-- get the witness from `succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff` and prove that it has the additional
-- properties
rcases succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff.mp stream_succ_nth_eq with
⟨ifp_n, seq_nth_eq, _, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ifp_n, seq_nth_eq, ?_⟩
simpa only [IntFractPair.of, Int.fract, sub_eq_zero] using succ_nth_fr_eq_zero
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Vladimir Goryachev. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Goryachev, Kyle Miller, Scott Morrison, Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.count from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
/-!
# Counting on ℕ
This file defines the `count` function, which gives, for any predicate on the natural numbers,
"how many numbers under `k` satisfy this predicate?".
We then prove several expected lemmas about `count`, relating it to the cardinality of other
objects, and helping to evaluate it for specific `k`.
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
section Count
variable [DecidablePred p]
/-- Count the number of naturals `k < n` satisfying `p k`. -/
def count (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(List.range n).countP p
#align nat.count Nat.count
@[simp]
theorem count_zero : count p 0 = 0 := by
rw [count, List.range_zero, List.countP, List.countP.go]
#align nat.count_zero Nat.count_zero
/-- A fintype instance for the set relevant to `Nat.count`. Locally an instance in locale `count` -/
def CountSet.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i // i < n ∧ p i } := by
apply Fintype.ofFinset ((Finset.range n).filter p)
intro x
rw [mem_filter, mem_range]
rfl
#align nat.count_set.fintype Nat.CountSet.fintype
scoped[Count] attribute [instance] Nat.CountSet.fintype
open Count
theorem count_eq_card_filter_range (n : ℕ) : count p n = ((range n).filter p).card := by
rw [count, List.countP_eq_length_filter]
rfl
#align nat.count_eq_card_filter_range Nat.count_eq_card_filter_range
/-- `count p n` can be expressed as the cardinality of `{k // k < n ∧ p k}`. -/
theorem count_eq_card_fintype (n : ℕ) : count p n = Fintype.card { k : ℕ // k < n ∧ p k } := by
rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, ← Fintype.card_ofFinset, ← CountSet.fintype]
rfl
#align nat.count_eq_card_fintype Nat.count_eq_card_fintype
theorem count_succ (n : ℕ) : count p (n + 1) = count p n + if p n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [count, List.range_succ, h]
#align nat.count_succ Nat.count_succ
@[mono]
theorem count_monotone : Monotone (count p) :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n ↦ by by_cases h : p n <;> simp [count_succ, h]
#align nat.count_monotone Nat.count_monotone
theorem count_add (a b : ℕ) : count p (a + b) = count p a + count (fun k ↦ p (a + k)) b := by
have : Disjoint ((range a).filter p) (((range b).map <| addLeftEmbedding a).filter p) := by
apply disjoint_filter_filter
rw [Finset.disjoint_left]
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
rintro x hx ⟨c, _, rfl⟩
exact (self_le_add_right _ _).not_lt hx
simp_rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, range_add, filter_union, card_union_of_disjoint this,
filter_map, addLeftEmbedding, card_map]
rfl
#align nat.count_add Nat.count_add
theorem count_add' (a b : ℕ) : count p (a + b) = count (fun k ↦ p (k + b)) a + count p b := by
rw [add_comm, count_add, add_comm]
simp_rw [add_comm b]
#align nat.count_add' Nat.count_add'
theorem count_one : count p 1 = if p 0 then 1 else 0 := by simp [count_succ]
#align nat.count_one Nat.count_one
theorem count_succ' (n : ℕ) :
count p (n + 1) = count (fun k ↦ p (k + 1)) n + if p 0 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [count_add', count_one]
#align nat.count_succ' Nat.count_succ'
variable {p}
@[simp]
theorem count_lt_count_succ_iff {n : ℕ} : count p n < count p (n + 1) ↔ p n := by
by_cases h : p n <;> simp [count_succ, h]
#align nat.count_lt_count_succ_iff Nat.count_lt_count_succ_iff
theorem count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff {n : ℕ} : count p (n + 1) = count p n + 1 ↔ p n := by
by_cases h : p n <;> simp [h, count_succ]
#align nat.count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff Nat.count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff
theorem count_succ_eq_count_iff {n : ℕ} : count p (n + 1) = count p n ↔ ¬p n := by
by_cases h : p n <;> simp [h, count_succ]
#align nat.count_succ_eq_count_iff Nat.count_succ_eq_count_iff
alias ⟨_, count_succ_eq_succ_count⟩ := count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff
#align nat.count_succ_eq_succ_count Nat.count_succ_eq_succ_count
alias ⟨_, count_succ_eq_count⟩ := count_succ_eq_count_iff
#align nat.count_succ_eq_count Nat.count_succ_eq_count
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Count.lean | 120 | 122 | theorem count_le_cardinal (n : ℕ) : (count p n : Cardinal) ≤ Cardinal.mk { k | p k } := by |
rw [count_eq_card_fintype, ← Cardinal.mk_fintype]
exact Cardinal.mk_subtype_mono fun x hx ↦ hx.2
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
#align_import analysis.calculus.extend_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Extending differentiability to the boundary
We investigate how differentiable functions inside a set extend to differentiable functions
on the boundary. For this, it suffices that the function and its derivative admit limits there.
A general version of this statement is given in `has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv`.
One-dimensional versions, in which one wants to obtain differentiability at the left endpoint or
the right endpoint of an interval, are given in
`has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv` and
`has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv`. These versions are formulated in terms
of the one-dimensional derivative `deriv ℝ f`.
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Filter Set Metric ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped Topology
attribute [local mono] Set.prod_mono
/-- If a function `f` is differentiable in a convex open set and continuous on its closure, and its
derivative converges to a limit `f'` at a point on the boundary, then `f` is differentiable there
with derivative `f'`. -/
theorem has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E} {f' : E →L[ℝ] F}
(f_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (s_conv : Convex ℝ s) (s_open : IsOpen s)
(f_cont : ∀ y ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s y)
(h : Tendsto (fun y => fderiv ℝ f y) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 f')) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (closure s) x := by
classical
-- one can assume without loss of generality that `x` belongs to the closure of `s`, as the
-- statement is empty otherwise
by_cases hx : x ∉ closure s
· rw [← closure_closure] at hx; exact hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nmem_closure hx
push_neg at hx
rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff]
/- One needs to show that `‖f y - f x - f' (y - x)‖ ≤ ε ‖y - x‖` for `y` close to `x` in
`closure s`, where `ε` is an arbitrary positive constant. By continuity of the functions, it
suffices to prove this for nearby points inside `s`. In a neighborhood of `x`, the derivative
of `f` is arbitrarily close to `f'` by assumption. The mean value inequality completes the
proof. -/
intro ε ε_pos
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ y ∈ s, dist y x < δ → ‖fderiv ℝ f y - f'‖ < ε := by
simpa [dist_zero_right] using tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds.1 h ε ε_pos
set B := ball x δ
suffices ∀ y ∈ B ∩ closure s, ‖f y - f x - (f' y - f' x)‖ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖ from
mem_nhdsWithin_iff.2 ⟨δ, δ_pos, fun y hy => by simpa using this y hy⟩
suffices
∀ p : E × E,
p ∈ closure ((B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s)) → ‖f p.2 - f p.1 - (f' p.2 - f' p.1)‖ ≤ ε * ‖p.2 - p.1‖ by
rw [closure_prod_eq] at this
intro y y_in
apply this ⟨x, y⟩
have : B ∩ closure s ⊆ closure (B ∩ s) := isOpen_ball.inter_closure
exact ⟨this ⟨mem_ball_self δ_pos, hx⟩, this y_in⟩
have key : ∀ p : E × E, p ∈ (B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s) →
‖f p.2 - f p.1 - (f' p.2 - f' p.1)‖ ≤ ε * ‖p.2 - p.1‖ := by
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
have conv : Convex ℝ (B ∩ s) := (convex_ball _ _).inter s_conv
have diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (B ∩ s) := f_diff.mono inter_subset_right
have bound : ∀ z ∈ B ∩ s, ‖fderivWithin ℝ f (B ∩ s) z - f'‖ ≤ ε := by
intro z z_in
have h := hδ z
have : fderivWithin ℝ f (B ∩ s) z = fderiv ℝ f z := by
have op : IsOpen (B ∩ s) := isOpen_ball.inter s_open
rw [DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin _ (op.uniqueDiffOn z z_in)]
exact (diff z z_in).differentiableAt (IsOpen.mem_nhds op z_in)
rw [← this] at h
exact le_of_lt (h z_in.2 z_in.1)
simpa using conv.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le' diff bound u_in v_in
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ uv_in
have f_cont' : ∀ y ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt (f - ⇑f') s y := by
intro y y_in
exact Tendsto.sub (f_cont y y_in) f'.cont.continuousWithinAt
refine ContinuousWithinAt.closure_le uv_in ?_ ?_ key
all_goals
-- common start for both continuity proofs
have : (B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s) ⊆ s ×ˢ s := by mono <;> exact inter_subset_right
obtain ⟨u_in, v_in⟩ : u ∈ closure s ∧ v ∈ closure s := by
simpa [closure_prod_eq] using closure_mono this uv_in
apply ContinuousWithinAt.mono _ this
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt]
· rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
have : ∀ u v, f v - f u - (f' v - f' u) = f v - f' v - (f u - f' u) := by intros; abel
simp only [this]
exact
Tendsto.comp continuous_norm.continuousAt
((Tendsto.comp (f_cont' v v_in) tendsto_snd).sub <|
Tendsto.comp (f_cont' u u_in) tendsto_fst)
· apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact
tendsto_const_nhds.mul
(Tendsto.comp continuous_norm.continuousAt <| tendsto_snd.sub tendsto_fst)
#align has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv
/-- If a function is differentiable on the right of a point `a : ℝ`, continuous at `a`, and
its derivative also converges at `a`, then `f` is differentiable on the right at `a`. -/
theorem has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv {s : Set ℝ} {e : E} {a : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
(f_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (f_lim : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[>] a)
(f_lim' : Tendsto (fun x => deriv f x) (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 e)) : HasDerivWithinAt f e (Ici a) a := by
/- This is a specialization of `has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv`. To be in the setting of
this theorem, we need to work on an open interval with closure contained in `s ∪ {a}`, that we
call `t = (a, b)`. Then, we check all the assumptions of this theorem and we apply it. -/
obtain ⟨b, ab : a < b, sab : Ioc a b ⊆ s⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset.1 hs
let t := Ioo a b
have ts : t ⊆ s := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ioc_self sab
have t_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f t := f_diff.mono ts
have t_conv : Convex ℝ t := convex_Ioo a b
have t_open : IsOpen t := isOpen_Ioo
have t_closure : closure t = Icc a b := closure_Ioo ab.ne
have t_cont : ∀ y ∈ closure t, ContinuousWithinAt f t y := by
rw [t_closure]
intro y hy
by_cases h : y = a
· rw [h]; exact f_lim.mono ts
· have : y ∈ s := sab ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne hy.1 (Ne.symm h), hy.2⟩
exact (f_diff.continuousOn y this).mono ts
have t_diff' : Tendsto (fun x => fderiv ℝ f x) (𝓝[t] a) (𝓝 (smulRight (1 : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℝ) e)) := by
simp only [deriv_fderiv.symm]
exact Tendsto.comp
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight : IsBoundedBilinearMap ℝ _).continuous_right.continuousAt
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left Ioo_subset_Ioi_self f_lim')
-- now we can apply `has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_differentiable`
have : HasDerivWithinAt f e (Icc a b) a := by
rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, ← t_closure]
exact has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv t_diff t_conv t_open t_cont t_diff'
exact this.mono_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici <| left_mem_Ico.2 ab)
#align has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv
/-- If a function is differentiable on the left of a point `a : ℝ`, continuous at `a`, and
its derivative also converges at `a`, then `f` is differentiable on the left at `a`. -/
theorem has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv {s : Set ℝ} {e : E} {a : ℝ}
{f : ℝ → E} (f_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (f_lim : ContinuousWithinAt f s a)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝[<] a) (f_lim' : Tendsto (fun x => deriv f x) (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 e)) :
HasDerivWithinAt f e (Iic a) a := by
/- This is a specialization of `has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_differentiable`. To be in the setting of
this theorem, we need to work on an open interval with closure contained in `s ∪ {a}`, that we
call `t = (b, a)`. Then, we check all the assumptions of this theorem and we apply it. -/
obtain ⟨b, ba, sab⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Iio a, Ico b a ⊆ s := mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_Ico_subset.1 hs
let t := Ioo b a
have ts : t ⊆ s := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self sab
have t_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f t := f_diff.mono ts
have t_conv : Convex ℝ t := convex_Ioo b a
have t_open : IsOpen t := isOpen_Ioo
have t_closure : closure t = Icc b a := closure_Ioo (ne_of_lt ba)
have t_cont : ∀ y ∈ closure t, ContinuousWithinAt f t y := by
rw [t_closure]
intro y hy
by_cases h : y = a
· rw [h]; exact f_lim.mono ts
· have : y ∈ s := sab ⟨hy.1, lt_of_le_of_ne hy.2 h⟩
exact (f_diff.continuousOn y this).mono ts
have t_diff' : Tendsto (fun x => fderiv ℝ f x) (𝓝[t] a) (𝓝 (smulRight (1 : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℝ) e)) := by
simp only [deriv_fderiv.symm]
exact Tendsto.comp
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight : IsBoundedBilinearMap ℝ _).continuous_right.continuousAt
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left Ioo_subset_Iio_self f_lim')
-- now we can apply `has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_differentiable`
have : HasDerivWithinAt f e (Icc b a) a := by
rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, ← t_closure]
exact has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv t_diff t_conv t_open t_cont t_diff'
exact this.mono_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic <| right_mem_Ioc.2 ba)
#align has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv
/-- If a real function `f` has a derivative `g` everywhere but at a point, and `f` and `g` are
continuous at this point, then `g` is also the derivative of `f` at this point. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_ne {f g : ℝ → E} {x : ℝ}
(f_diff : ∀ y ≠ x, HasDerivAt f (g y) y) (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : HasDerivAt f (g x) x := by
have A : HasDerivWithinAt f (g x) (Ici x) x := by
have diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioi x) := fun y hy =>
(f_diff y (ne_of_gt hy)).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
-- next line is the nontrivial bit of this proof, appealing to differentiability
-- extension results.
apply
has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv diff hf.continuousWithinAt
self_mem_nhdsWithin
have : Tendsto g (𝓝[>] x) (𝓝 (g x)) := tendsto_inf_left hg
apply this.congr' _
apply mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin fun y hy => _
intros y hy
exact (f_diff y (ne_of_gt hy)).deriv.symm
have B : HasDerivWithinAt f (g x) (Iic x) x := by
have diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Iio x) := fun y hy =>
(f_diff y (ne_of_lt hy)).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
-- next line is the nontrivial bit of this proof, appealing to differentiability
-- extension results.
apply
has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv diff hf.continuousWithinAt
self_mem_nhdsWithin
have : Tendsto g (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝 (g x)) := tendsto_inf_left hg
apply this.congr' _
apply mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin fun y hy => _
intros y hy
exact (f_diff y (ne_of_lt hy)).deriv.symm
simpa using B.union A
#align has_deriv_at_of_has_deriv_at_of_ne hasDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_ne
/-- If a real function `f` has a derivative `g` everywhere but at a point, and `f` and `g` are
continuous at this point, then `g` is the derivative of `f` everywhere. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Extend.lean | 214 | 219 | theorem hasDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_ne' {f g : ℝ → E} {x : ℝ}
(f_diff : ∀ y ≠ x, HasDerivAt f (g y) y) (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) (y : ℝ) : HasDerivAt f (g y) y := by |
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· exact hasDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_ne f_diff hf hg
· exact f_diff y hne
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jalex Stark. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jalex Stark, Scott Morrison, Eric Wieser, Oliver Nash, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
#align_import data.matrix.basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"320df450e9abeb5fc6417971e75acb6ae8bc3794"
/-!
# Matrices with a single non-zero element.
This file provides `Matrix.stdBasisMatrix`. The matrix `Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j c` has `c`
at position `(i, j)`, and zeroes elsewhere.
-/
variable {l m n : Type*}
variable {R α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Matrix
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
variable [Semiring α]
/-- `stdBasisMatrix i j a` is the matrix with `a` in the `i`-th row, `j`-th column,
and zeroes elsewhere.
-/
def stdBasisMatrix (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) : Matrix m n α := fun i' j' =>
if i = i' ∧ j = j' then a else 0
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix Matrix.stdBasisMatrix
@[simp]
theorem smul_stdBasisMatrix [SMulZeroClass R α] (r : R) (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) :
r • stdBasisMatrix i j a = stdBasisMatrix i j (r • a) := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix
ext
simp [smul_ite]
#align matrix.smul_std_basis_matrix Matrix.smul_stdBasisMatrix
@[simp]
theorem stdBasisMatrix_zero (i : m) (j : n) : stdBasisMatrix i j (0 : α) = 0 := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix
ext
simp
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix_zero Matrix.stdBasisMatrix_zero
theorem stdBasisMatrix_add (i : m) (j : n) (a b : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j (a + b) = stdBasisMatrix i j a + stdBasisMatrix i j b := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix; ext
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix_add Matrix.stdBasisMatrix_add
theorem mulVec_stdBasisMatrix [Fintype m] (i : n) (j : m) (c : α) (x : m → α) :
mulVec (stdBasisMatrix i j c) x = Function.update (0 : n → α) i (c * x j) := by
ext i'
simp [stdBasisMatrix, mulVec, dotProduct]
rcases eq_or_ne i i' with rfl|h
· simp
simp [h, h.symm]
theorem matrix_eq_sum_std_basis [Fintype m] [Fintype n] (x : Matrix m n α) :
x = ∑ i : m, ∑ j : n, stdBasisMatrix i j (x i j) := by
ext i j; symm
iterate 2 rw [Finset.sum_apply]
-- Porting note: was `convert`
refine (Fintype.sum_eq_single i ?_).trans ?_; swap
· -- Porting note: `simp` seems unwilling to apply `Fintype.sum_apply`
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [stdBasisMatrix]
rw [Fintype.sum_apply, Fintype.sum_apply]
simp
· intro j' hj'
-- Porting note: `simp` seems unwilling to apply `Fintype.sum_apply`
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [stdBasisMatrix]
rw [Fintype.sum_apply, Fintype.sum_apply]
simp [hj']
#align matrix.matrix_eq_sum_std_basis Matrix.matrix_eq_sum_std_basis
-- TODO: tie this up with the `Basis` machinery of linear algebra
-- this is not completely trivial because we are indexing by two types, instead of one
-- TODO: add `std_basis_vec`
theorem std_basis_eq_basis_mul_basis (i : m) (j : n) :
stdBasisMatrix i j (1 : α) =
vecMulVec (fun i' => ite (i = i') 1 0) fun j' => ite (j = j') 1 0 := by
ext i' j'
-- Porting note: was `norm_num [std_basis_matrix, vec_mul_vec]` though there are no numerals
-- involved.
simp only [stdBasisMatrix, vecMulVec, mul_ite, mul_one, mul_zero, of_apply]
-- Porting note: added next line
simp_rw [@and_comm (i = i')]
exact ite_and _ _ _ _
#align matrix.std_basis_eq_basis_mul_basis Matrix.std_basis_eq_basis_mul_basis
-- todo: the old proof used fintypes, I don't know `Finsupp` but this feels generalizable
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' [Finite m] [Finite n] {P : Matrix m n α → Prop} (M : Matrix m n α)
(h_zero : P 0) (h_add : ∀ p q, P p → P q → P (p + q))
(h_std_basis : ∀ (i : m) (j : n) (x : α), P (stdBasisMatrix i j x)) : P M := by
cases nonempty_fintype m; cases nonempty_fintype n
rw [matrix_eq_sum_std_basis M, ← Finset.sum_product']
apply Finset.sum_induction _ _ h_add h_zero
· intros
apply h_std_basis
#align matrix.induction_on' Matrix.induction_on'
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on [Finite m] [Finite n] [Nonempty m] [Nonempty n]
{P : Matrix m n α → Prop} (M : Matrix m n α) (h_add : ∀ p q, P p → P q → P (p + q))
(h_std_basis : ∀ i j x, P (stdBasisMatrix i j x)) : P M :=
Matrix.induction_on' M
(by
inhabit m
inhabit n
simpa using h_std_basis default default 0)
h_add h_std_basis
#align matrix.induction_on Matrix.induction_on
namespace StdBasisMatrix
section
variable (i : m) (j : n) (c : α) (i' : m) (j' : n)
@[simp]
theorem apply_same : stdBasisMatrix i j c i j = c :=
if_pos (And.intro rfl rfl)
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.apply_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.apply_same
@[simp]
theorem apply_of_ne (h : ¬(i = i' ∧ j = j')) : stdBasisMatrix i j c i' j' = 0 := by
simp only [stdBasisMatrix, and_imp, ite_eq_right_iff]
tauto
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.apply_of_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem apply_of_row_ne {i i' : m} (hi : i ≠ i') (j j' : n) (a : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j a i' j' = 0 := by simp [hi]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.apply_of_row_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_row_ne
@[simp]
theorem apply_of_col_ne (i i' : m) {j j' : n} (hj : j ≠ j') (a : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j a i' j' = 0 := by simp [hj]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.apply_of_col_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_col_ne
end
section
variable (i j : n) (c : α) (i' j' : n)
@[simp]
theorem diag_zero (h : j ≠ i) : diag (stdBasisMatrix i j c) = 0 :=
funext fun _ => if_neg fun ⟨e₁, e₂⟩ => h (e₂.trans e₁.symm)
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.diag_zero Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.diag_zero
@[simp]
theorem diag_same : diag (stdBasisMatrix i i c) = Pi.single i c := by
ext j
by_cases hij : i = j <;> (try rw [hij]) <;> simp [hij]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.diag_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.diag_same
variable [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem trace_zero (h : j ≠ i) : trace (stdBasisMatrix i j c) = 0 := by
-- Porting note: added `-diag_apply`
simp [trace, -diag_apply, h]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.trace_zero Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_zero
@[simp]
theorem trace_eq : trace (stdBasisMatrix i i c) = c := by
-- Porting note: added `-diag_apply`
simp [trace, -diag_apply]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.trace_eq Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_eq
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_apply_same (b : n) (M : Matrix n n α) :
(stdBasisMatrix i j c * M) i b = c * M j b := by simp [mul_apply, stdBasisMatrix]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_left_apply_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_left_apply_same
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_apply_same (a : n) (M : Matrix n n α) :
(M * stdBasisMatrix i j c) a j = M a i * c := by simp [mul_apply, stdBasisMatrix, mul_comm]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_right_apply_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_right_apply_same
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (h : a ≠ i) (M : Matrix n n α) :
(stdBasisMatrix i j c * M) a b = 0 := by simp [mul_apply, h.symm]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_left_apply_of_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_left_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (hbj : b ≠ j) (M : Matrix n n α) :
(M * stdBasisMatrix i j c) a b = 0 := by simp [mul_apply, hbj.symm]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_right_apply_of_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_right_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem mul_same (k : n) (d : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j c * stdBasisMatrix j k d = stdBasisMatrix i k (c * d) := by
ext a b
simp only [mul_apply, stdBasisMatrix, boole_mul]
by_cases h₁ : i = a <;> by_cases h₂ : k = b <;> simp [h₁, h₂]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_same
@[simp]
theorem mul_of_ne {k l : n} (h : j ≠ k) (d : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j c * stdBasisMatrix k l d = 0 := by
ext a b
simp only [mul_apply, boole_mul, stdBasisMatrix]
by_cases h₁ : i = a
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [h₁, h, h.symm]`
· simp only [h₁, true_and, mul_ite, ite_mul, zero_mul, mul_zero, ← ite_and, zero_apply]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero (fun x _ => ?_)
apply if_neg
rintro ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩, h⟩
contradiction
· simp only [h₁, false_and, ite_false, mul_ite, zero_mul, mul_zero, ite_self,
Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_apply]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_of_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_of_ne
end
end StdBasisMatrix
section Commute
variable [Fintype n]
theorem row_eq_zero_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix {i j k : n} {M : Matrix n n α}
(hM : Commute (stdBasisMatrix i j 1) M) (hkj : k ≠ j) : M j k = 0 := by
have := ext_iff.mpr hM i k
aesop
theorem col_eq_zero_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix {i j k : n} {M : Matrix n n α}
(hM : Commute (stdBasisMatrix i j 1) M) (hki : k ≠ i) : M k i = 0 := by
have := ext_iff.mpr hM k j
aesop
theorem diag_eq_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix {i j : n} {M : Matrix n n α}
(hM : Commute (stdBasisMatrix i j 1) M) : M i i = M j j := by
have := ext_iff.mpr hM i j
aesop
/-- `M` is a scalar matrix if it commutes with every non-diagonal `stdBasisMatrix`. -/
theorem mem_range_scalar_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix {M : Matrix n n α}
(hM : Pairwise fun i j => Commute (stdBasisMatrix i j 1) M) :
M ∈ Set.range (Matrix.scalar n) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· exact ⟨0, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
obtain ⟨i⟩ := ‹Nonempty n›
refine ⟨M i i, Matrix.ext fun j k => ?_⟩
simp only [scalar_apply]
obtain rfl | hkl := Decidable.eq_or_ne j k
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq]
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· rfl
· exact diag_eq_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix (hM hij)
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hkl]
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· rw [col_eq_zero_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix (hM hkl.symm) hkl]
· rw [row_eq_zero_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix (hM hij) hkl.symm]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basis.lean | 265 | 269 | theorem mem_range_scalar_iff_commute_stdBasisMatrix {M : Matrix n n α} :
M ∈ Set.range (Matrix.scalar n) ↔ ∀ (i j : n), i ≠ j → Commute (stdBasisMatrix i j 1) M := by |
refine ⟨fun ⟨r, hr⟩ i j _ => hr ▸ Commute.symm ?_, mem_range_scalar_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix⟩
rw [scalar_commute_iff]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OreLocalization.Basic
#align_import group_theory.monoid_localization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10ee941346c27bdb5e87bb3535100c0b1f08ac41"
/-!
# Localizations of commutative monoids
Localizing a commutative ring at one of its submonoids does not rely on the ring's addition, so
we can generalize localizations to commutative monoids.
We characterize the localization of a commutative monoid `M` at a submonoid `S` up to
isomorphism; that is, a commutative monoid `N` is the localization of `M` at `S` iff we can find a
monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` satisfying 3 properties:
1. For all `y ∈ S`, `f y` is a unit;
2. For all `z : N`, there exists `(x, y) : M × S` such that `z * f y = f x`;
3. For all `x, y : M` such that `f x = f y`, there exists `c ∈ S` such that `x * c = y * c`.
(The converse is a consequence of 1.)
Given such a localization map `f : M →* N`, we can define the surjection
`Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'` sending `(x, y) : M × S` to `f x * (f y)⁻¹`, and
`Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift`, the homomorphism from `N` induced by a homomorphism from `M` which
maps elements of `S` to invertible elements of the codomain. Similarly, given commutative monoids
`P, Q`, a submonoid `T` of `P` and a localization map for `T` from `P` to `Q`, then a homomorphism
`g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T` induces a homomorphism of localizations, `LocalizationMap.map`,
from `N` to `Q`. We treat the special case of localizing away from an element in the sections
`AwayMap` and `Away`.
We also define the quotient of `M × S` by the unique congruence relation (equivalence relation
preserving a binary operation) `r` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S`
satisfying '`∀ y ∈ S`, `(1, 1) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`', we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`
whenever `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r`. We show this relation is equivalent to the standard
localization relation.
This defines the localization as a quotient type, `Localization`, but the majority of
subsequent lemmas in the file are given in terms of localizations up to isomorphism, using maps
which satisfy the characteristic predicate.
The Grothendieck group construction corresponds to localizing at the top submonoid, namely making
every element invertible.
## Implementation notes
In maths it is natural to reason up to isomorphism, but in Lean we cannot naturally `rewrite` one
structure with an isomorphic one; one way around this is to isolate a predicate characterizing
a structure up to isomorphism, and reason about things that satisfy the predicate.
The infimum form of the localization congruence relation is chosen as 'canonical' here, since it
shortens some proofs.
To apply a localization map `f` as a function, we use `f.toMap`, as coercions don't work well for
this structure.
To reason about the localization as a quotient type, use `mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'` and associated
lemmas. These show the quotient map `mk : M → S → Localization S` equals the
surjection `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by the map
`Localization.monoidOf : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S (Localization S)` (where `of` establishes the
localization as a quotient type satisfies the characteristic predicate). The lemma
`mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'` hence gives you access to the results in the rest of the file, which are about
the `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by any localization map.
## TODO
* Show that the localization at the top monoid is a group.
* Generalise to (nonempty) subsemigroups.
* If we acquire more bundlings, we can make `Localization.mkOrderEmbedding` be an ordered monoid
embedding.
## Tags
localization, monoid localization, quotient monoid, congruence relation, characteristic predicate,
commutative monoid, grothendieck group
-/
open Function
namespace AddSubmonoid
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (S : AddSubmonoid M) (N : Type*) [AddCommMonoid N]
/-- The type of AddMonoid homomorphisms satisfying the characteristic predicate: if `f : M →+ N`
satisfies this predicate, then `N` is isomorphic to the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure LocalizationMap extends AddMonoidHom M N where
map_add_units' : ∀ y : S, IsAddUnit (toFun y)
surj' : ∀ z : N, ∃ x : M × S, z + toFun x.2 = toFun x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ x y, toFun x = toFun y → ∃ c : S, ↑c + x = ↑c + y
#align add_submonoid.localization_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: no docstrings for AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_add_units'
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.surj' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_eq
/-- The AddMonoidHom underlying a `LocalizationMap` of `AddCommMonoid`s. -/
add_decl_doc LocalizationMap.toAddMonoidHom
end AddSubmonoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (S : Submonoid M) (N : Type*) [CommMonoid N] {P : Type*}
[CommMonoid P]
namespace Submonoid
/-- The type of monoid homomorphisms satisfying the characteristic predicate: if `f : M →* N`
satisfies this predicate, then `N` is isomorphic to the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure LocalizationMap extends MonoidHom M N where
map_units' : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (toFun y)
surj' : ∀ z : N, ∃ x : M × S, z * toFun x.2 = toFun x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ x y, toFun x = toFun y → ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = c * y
#align submonoid.localization_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: no docstrings for Submonoid.LocalizationMap
attribute [nolint docBlame] Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_units' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.surj'
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_eq
attribute [to_additive] Submonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: this translation already exists
-- attribute [to_additive] Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMonoidHom
/-- The monoid hom underlying a `LocalizationMap`. -/
add_decl_doc LocalizationMap.toMonoidHom
end Submonoid
namespace Localization
-- Porting note: this does not work so it is done explicitly instead
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `Localization `AddLocalization
-- run_cmd Elab.Command.liftCoreM <| ToAdditive.insertTranslation `Localization `AddLocalization
/-- The congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a submonoid of `M`, whose
quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`, defined as the unique congruence relation on
`M × S` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S` where for all `y ∈ S`,
`(1, 1) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`, we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r` implies
`(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`. -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r
"The congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` an `AddCommMonoid` and `S` an `AddSubmonoid` of `M`,
whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`, defined as the unique congruence relation on
`M × S` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S` where for all `y ∈ S`,
`(0, 0) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`, we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r` implies
`(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`."]
def r (S : Submonoid M) : Con (M × S) :=
sInf { c | ∀ y : S, c 1 (y, y) }
#align localization.r Localization.r
#align add_localization.r AddLocalization.r
/-- An alternate form of the congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a
submonoid of `M`, whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r'
"An alternate form of the congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a
submonoid of `M`, whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`."]
def r' : Con (M × S) := by
-- note we multiply by `c` on the left so that we can later generalize to `•`
refine
{ r := fun a b : M × S ↦ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑b.2 * a.1) = c * (a.2 * b.1)
iseqv := ⟨fun a ↦ ⟨1, rfl⟩, fun ⟨c, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨c, hc.symm⟩, ?_⟩
mul' := ?_ }
· rintro a b c ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩
use t₂ * t₁ * b.2
simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul]
calc
(t₂ * t₁ * b.2 : M) * (c.2 * a.1) = t₂ * c.2 * (t₁ * (b.2 * a.1)) := by ac_rfl
_ = t₁ * a.2 * (t₂ * (c.2 * b.1)) := by rw [ht₁]; ac_rfl
_ = t₂ * t₁ * b.2 * (a.2 * c.1) := by rw [ht₂]; ac_rfl
· rintro a b c d ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩
use t₂ * t₁
calc
(t₂ * t₁ : M) * (b.2 * d.2 * (a.1 * c.1)) = t₂ * (d.2 * c.1) * (t₁ * (b.2 * a.1)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (t₂ * t₁ : M) * (a.2 * c.2 * (b.1 * d.1)) := by rw [ht₁, ht₂]; ac_rfl
#align localization.r' Localization.r'
#align add_localization.r' AddLocalization.r'
/-- The congruence relation used to localize a `CommMonoid` at a submonoid can be expressed
equivalently as an infimum (see `Localization.r`) or explicitly
(see `Localization.r'`). -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r_eq_r'
"The additive congruence relation used to localize an `AddCommMonoid` at a submonoid can be
expressed equivalently as an infimum (see `AddLocalization.r`) or explicitly
(see `AddLocalization.r'`)."]
theorem r_eq_r' : r S = r' S :=
le_antisymm (sInf_le fun _ ↦ ⟨1, by simp⟩) <|
le_sInf fun b H ⟨p, q⟩ ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ by
rw [← one_mul (p, q), ← one_mul (x, y)]
refine b.trans (b.mul (H (t * y)) (b.refl _)) ?_
convert b.symm (b.mul (H (t * q)) (b.refl (x, y))) using 1
dsimp only [Prod.mk_mul_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul] at ht ⊢
simp_rw [mul_assoc, ht, mul_comm y q]
#align localization.r_eq_r' Localization.r_eq_r'
#align add_localization.r_eq_r' AddLocalization.r_eq_r'
variable {S}
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r_iff_exists]
theorem r_iff_exists {x y : M × S} : r S x y ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑y.2 * x.1) = c * (x.2 * y.1) := by
rw [r_eq_r' S]; rfl
#align localization.r_iff_exists Localization.r_iff_exists
#align add_localization.r_iff_exists AddLocalization.r_iff_exists
end Localization
/-- The localization of a `CommMonoid` at one of its submonoids (as a quotient type). -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization
"The localization of an `AddCommMonoid` at one of its submonoids (as a quotient type)."]
def Localization := (Localization.r S).Quotient
#align localization Localization
#align add_localization AddLocalization
namespace Localization
@[to_additive]
instance inhabited : Inhabited (Localization S) := Con.Quotient.inhabited
#align localization.inhabited Localization.inhabited
#align add_localization.inhabited AddLocalization.inhabited
/-- Multiplication in a `Localization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ * ⟨c, d⟩ = ⟨a * c, b * d⟩`. -/
@[to_additive "Addition in an `AddLocalization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ + ⟨c, d⟩ = ⟨a + c, b + d⟩`.
Should not be confused with the ring localization counterpart `Localization.add`, which maps
`⟨a, b⟩ + ⟨c, d⟩` to `⟨d * a + b * c, b * d⟩`."]
protected irreducible_def mul : Localization S → Localization S → Localization S :=
(r S).commMonoid.mul
#align localization.mul Localization.mul
#align add_localization.add AddLocalization.add
@[to_additive]
instance : Mul (Localization S) := ⟨Localization.mul S⟩
/-- The identity element of a `Localization` is defined as `⟨1, 1⟩`. -/
@[to_additive "The identity element of an `AddLocalization` is defined as `⟨0, 0⟩`.
Should not be confused with the ring localization counterpart `Localization.zero`,
which is defined as `⟨0, 1⟩`."]
protected irreducible_def one : Localization S := (r S).commMonoid.one
#align localization.one Localization.one
#align add_localization.zero AddLocalization.zero
@[to_additive]
instance : One (Localization S) := ⟨Localization.one S⟩
/-- Exponentiation in a `Localization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ ^ n = ⟨a ^ n, b ^ n⟩`.
This is a separate `irreducible` def to ensure the elaborator doesn't waste its time
trying to unify some huge recursive definition with itself, but unfolded one step less.
-/
@[to_additive "Multiplication with a natural in an `AddLocalization` is defined as
`n • ⟨a, b⟩ = ⟨n • a, n • b⟩`.
This is a separate `irreducible` def to ensure the elaborator doesn't waste its time
trying to unify some huge recursive definition with itself, but unfolded one step less."]
protected irreducible_def npow : ℕ → Localization S → Localization S := (r S).commMonoid.npow
#align localization.npow Localization.npow
#align add_localization.nsmul AddLocalization.nsmul
@[to_additive]
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid (Localization S) where
mul := (· * ·)
one := 1
mul_assoc x y z := show (x.mul S y).mul S z = x.mul S (y.mul S z) by
rw [Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_assoc
mul_comm x y := show x.mul S y = y.mul S x by
rw [Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_comm
mul_one x := show x.mul S (.one S) = x by
rw [Localization.mul, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_one
one_mul x := show (Localization.one S).mul S x = x by
rw [Localization.mul, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.one_mul
npow := Localization.npow S
npow_zero x := show Localization.npow S 0 x = .one S by
rw [Localization.npow, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.npow_zero
npow_succ n x := show Localization.npow S n.succ x = (Localization.npow S n x).mul S x by
rw [Localization.npow, Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.npow_succ
variable {S}
/-- Given a `CommMonoid` `M` and submonoid `S`, `mk` sends `x : M`, `y ∈ S` to the equivalence
class of `(x, y)` in the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an `AddCommMonoid` `M` and submonoid `S`, `mk` sends `x : M`, `y ∈ S` to
the equivalence class of `(x, y)` in the localization of `M` at `S`."]
def mk (x : M) (y : S) : Localization S := (r S).mk' (x, y)
#align localization.mk Localization.mk
#align add_localization.mk AddLocalization.mk
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff {a c : M} {b d : S} : mk a b = mk c d ↔ r S ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨c, d⟩ := (r S).eq
#align localization.mk_eq_mk_iff Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff
#align add_localization.mk_eq_mk_iff AddLocalization.mk_eq_mk_iff
universe u
/-- Dependent recursion principle for `Localizations`: given elements `f a b : p (mk a b)`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d` (with the correct coercions),
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"Dependent recursion principle for `AddLocalizations`: given elements `f a b : p (mk a b)`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d` (with the correct coercions),
then `f` is defined on the whole `AddLocalization S`."]
def rec {p : Localization S → Sort u} (f : ∀ (a : M) (b : S), p (mk a b))
(H : ∀ {a c : M} {b d : S} (h : r S (a, b) (c, d)),
(Eq.ndrec (f a b) (mk_eq_mk_iff.mpr h) : p (mk c d)) = f c d) (x) : p x :=
Quot.rec (fun y ↦ Eq.ndrec (f y.1 y.2) (by rfl)) (fun y z h ↦ by cases y; cases z; exact H h) x
#align localization.rec Localization.rec
#align add_localization.rec AddLocalization.rec
/-- Copy of `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂` for `Localization` -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "Copy of `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂` for `AddLocalization`"]
def recOnSubsingleton₂ {r : Localization S → Localization S → Sort u}
[h : ∀ (a c : M) (b d : S), Subsingleton (r (mk a b) (mk c d))] (x y : Localization S)
(f : ∀ (a c : M) (b d : S), r (mk a b) (mk c d)) : r x y :=
@Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' _ _ _ _ r (Prod.rec fun _ _ => Prod.rec fun _ _ => h _ _ _ _) x y
(Prod.rec fun _ _ => Prod.rec fun _ _ => f _ _ _ _)
#align localization.rec_on_subsingleton₂ Localization.recOnSubsingleton₂
#align add_localization.rec_on_subsingleton₂ AddLocalization.recOnSubsingleton₂
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_mul (a c : M) (b d : S) : mk a b * mk c d = mk (a * c) (b * d) :=
show Localization.mul S _ _ = _ by rw [Localization.mul]; rfl
#align localization.mk_mul Localization.mk_mul
#align add_localization.mk_add AddLocalization.mk_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_one : mk 1 (1 : S) = 1 :=
show mk _ _ = .one S by rw [Localization.one]; rfl
#align localization.mk_one Localization.mk_one
#align add_localization.mk_zero AddLocalization.mk_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_pow (n : ℕ) (a : M) (b : S) : mk a b ^ n = mk (a ^ n) (b ^ n) :=
show Localization.npow S _ _ = _ by rw [Localization.npow]; rfl
#align localization.mk_pow Localization.mk_pow
#align add_localization.mk_nsmul AddLocalization.mk_nsmul
-- Porting note: mathport translated `rec` to `ndrec` in the name of this lemma
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ndrec_mk {p : Localization S → Sort u} (f : ∀ (a : M) (b : S), p (mk a b)) (H) (a : M)
(b : S) : (rec f H (mk a b) : p (mk a b)) = f a b := rfl
#align localization.rec_mk Localization.ndrec_mk
#align add_localization.rec_mk AddLocalization.ndrec_mk
/-- Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f a b : p`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
-- Porting note: the attribute `elab_as_elim` fails with `unexpected eliminator resulting type p`
-- @[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
@[to_additive
"Non-dependent recursion principle for `AddLocalization`s: given elements `f a b : p`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`."]
def liftOn {p : Sort u} (x : Localization S) (f : M → S → p)
(H : ∀ {a c : M} {b d : S}, r S (a, b) (c, d) → f a b = f c d) : p :=
rec f (fun h ↦ (by simpa only [eq_rec_constant] using H h)) x
#align localization.lift_on Localization.liftOn
#align add_localization.lift_on AddLocalization.liftOn
@[to_additive]
theorem liftOn_mk {p : Sort u} (f : M → S → p) (H) (a : M) (b : S) :
liftOn (mk a b) f H = f a b := rfl
#align localization.lift_on_mk Localization.liftOn_mk
#align add_localization.lift_on_mk AddLocalization.liftOn_mk
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem ind {p : Localization S → Prop} (H : ∀ y : M × S, p (mk y.1 y.2)) (x) : p x :=
rec (fun a b ↦ H (a, b)) (fun _ ↦ rfl) x
#align localization.ind Localization.ind
#align add_localization.ind AddLocalization.ind
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on {p : Localization S → Prop} (x) (H : ∀ y : M × S, p (mk y.1 y.2)) : p x :=
ind H x
#align localization.induction_on Localization.induction_on
#align add_localization.induction_on AddLocalization.induction_on
/-- Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f x y : p`
for all `x` and `y`, such that `r S x x'` and `r S y y'` implies `f x y = f x' y'`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
-- Porting note: the attribute `elab_as_elim` fails with `unexpected eliminator resulting type p`
-- @[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
@[to_additive
"Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f x y : p`
for all `x` and `y`, such that `r S x x'` and `r S y y'` implies `f x y = f x' y'`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`."]
def liftOn₂ {p : Sort u} (x y : Localization S) (f : M → S → M → S → p)
(H : ∀ {a a' b b' c c' d d'}, r S (a, b) (a', b') → r S (c, d) (c', d') →
f a b c d = f a' b' c' d') : p :=
liftOn x (fun a b ↦ liftOn y (f a b) fun hy ↦ H ((r S).refl _) hy) fun hx ↦
induction_on y fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ H hx ((r S).refl _)
#align localization.lift_on₂ Localization.liftOn₂
#align add_localization.lift_on₂ AddLocalization.liftOn₂
@[to_additive]
theorem liftOn₂_mk {p : Sort*} (f : M → S → M → S → p) (H) (a c : M) (b d : S) :
liftOn₂ (mk a b) (mk c d) f H = f a b c d := rfl
#align localization.lift_on₂_mk Localization.liftOn₂_mk
#align add_localization.lift_on₂_mk AddLocalization.liftOn₂_mk
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on₂ {p : Localization S → Localization S → Prop} (x y)
(H : ∀ x y : M × S, p (mk x.1 x.2) (mk y.1 y.2)) : p x y :=
induction_on x fun x ↦ induction_on y <| H x
#align localization.induction_on₂ Localization.induction_on₂
#align add_localization.induction_on₂ AddLocalization.induction_on₂
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on₃ {p : Localization S → Localization S → Localization S → Prop} (x y z)
(H : ∀ x y z : M × S, p (mk x.1 x.2) (mk y.1 y.2) (mk z.1 z.2)) : p x y z :=
induction_on₂ x y fun x y ↦ induction_on z <| H x y
#align localization.induction_on₃ Localization.induction_on₃
#align add_localization.induction_on₃ AddLocalization.induction_on₃
@[to_additive]
theorem one_rel (y : S) : r S 1 (y, y) := fun _ hb ↦ hb y
#align localization.one_rel Localization.one_rel
#align add_localization.zero_rel AddLocalization.zero_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem r_of_eq {x y : M × S} (h : ↑y.2 * x.1 = ↑x.2 * y.1) : r S x y :=
r_iff_exists.2 ⟨1, by rw [h]⟩
#align localization.r_of_eq Localization.r_of_eq
#align add_localization.r_of_eq AddLocalization.r_of_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_self (a : S) : mk (a : M) a = 1 := by
symm
rw [← mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff]
exact one_rel a
#align localization.mk_self Localization.mk_self
#align add_localization.mk_self AddLocalization.mk_self
section Scalar
variable {R R₁ R₂ : Type*}
/-- Scalar multiplication in a monoid localization is defined as `c • ⟨a, b⟩ = ⟨c • a, b⟩`. -/
protected irreducible_def smul [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] (c : R) (z : Localization S) :
Localization S :=
Localization.liftOn z (fun a b ↦ mk (c • a) b)
(fun {a a' b b'} h ↦ mk_eq_mk_iff.2 (by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := b
let ⟨b', hb'⟩ := b'
rw [r_eq_r'] at h ⊢
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := h
use t
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at ht ⊢
-- TODO: this definition should take `SMulCommClass R M M` instead of `IsScalarTower R M M` if
-- we ever want to generalize to the non-commutative case.
haveI : SMulCommClass R M M :=
⟨fun r m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_comm m₁, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
simp only [mul_smul_comm, ht]))
#align localization.smul Localization.smul
instance instSMulLocalization [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] : SMul R (Localization S) where
smul := Localization.smul
theorem smul_mk [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] (c : R) (a b) :
c • (mk a b : Localization S) = mk (c • a) b := by
simp only [HSMul.hSMul, instHSMul, SMul.smul, instSMulLocalization, Localization.smul]
show liftOn (mk a b) (fun a b => mk (c • a) b) _ = _
exact liftOn_mk (fun a b => mk (c • a) b) _ a b
#align localization.smul_mk Localization.smul_mk
instance [SMul R₁ M] [SMul R₂ M] [IsScalarTower R₁ M M] [IsScalarTower R₂ M M]
[SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ M] : SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (Localization S) where
smul_comm s t := Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_comm s t r]
instance [SMul R₁ M] [SMul R₂ M] [IsScalarTower R₁ M M] [IsScalarTower R₂ M M] [SMul R₁ R₂]
[IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ M] : IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (Localization S) where
smul_assoc s t := Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_assoc s t r]
instance smulCommClass_right {R : Type*} [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
SMulCommClass R (Localization S) (Localization S) where
smul_comm s :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by
simp only [smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, mk_mul, mul_comm r₁, smul_mul_assoc]
#align localization.smul_comm_class_right Localization.smulCommClass_right
instance isScalarTower_right {R : Type*} [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
IsScalarTower R (Localization S) (Localization S) where
smul_assoc s :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, mk_mul, smul_mul_assoc]
#align localization.is_scalar_tower_right Localization.isScalarTower_right
instance [SMul R M] [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsScalarTower R M M] [IsScalarTower Rᵐᵒᵖ M M]
[IsCentralScalar R M] : IsCentralScalar R (Localization S) where
op_smul_eq_smul s :=
Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, op_smul_eq_smul]
instance [Monoid R] [MulAction R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] : MulAction R (Localization S) where
one_smul :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intros
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, one_smul]
mul_smul s₁ s₂ :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intros
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, mul_smul]
instance [Monoid R] [MulDistribMulAction R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
MulDistribMulAction R (Localization S) where
smul_one s := by simp only [← Localization.mk_one, Localization.smul_mk, smul_one]
smul_mul s x y :=
Localization.induction_on₂ x y <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by simp only [Localization.smul_mk, Localization.mk_mul, smul_mul']
end Scalar
end Localization
variable {S N}
namespace MonoidHom
/-- Makes a localization map from a `CommMonoid` hom satisfying the characteristic predicate. -/
@[to_additive
"Makes a localization map from an `AddCommMonoid` hom satisfying the characteristic predicate."]
def toLocalizationMap (f : M →* N) (H1 : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y))
(H2 : ∀ z, ∃ x : M × S, z * f x.2 = f x.1) (H3 : ∀ x y, f x = f y → ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = ↑c * y) :
Submonoid.LocalizationMap S N :=
{ f with
map_units' := H1
surj' := H2
exists_of_eq := H3 }
#align monoid_hom.to_localization_map MonoidHom.toLocalizationMap
#align add_monoid_hom.to_localization_map AddMonoidHom.toLocalizationMap
end MonoidHom
namespace Submonoid
namespace LocalizationMap
/-- Short for `toMonoidHom`; used to apply a localization map as a function. -/
@[to_additive "Short for `toAddMonoidHom`; used to apply a localization map as a function."]
abbrev toMap (f : LocalizationMap S N) := f.toMonoidHom
#align submonoid.localization_map.to_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.to_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext {f g : LocalizationMap S N} (h : ∀ x, f.toMap x = g.toMap x) : f = g := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, MonoidHom.mk.injEq]
exact OneHom.ext h
#align submonoid.localization_map.ext Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ext
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.ext AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem ext_iff {f g : LocalizationMap S N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f.toMap x = g.toMap x :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ h ▸ rfl, ext⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.ext_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ext_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.ext_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ext_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem toMap_injective : Function.Injective (@LocalizationMap.toMap _ _ S N _) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ext <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h
#align submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap_injective
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem map_units (f : LocalizationMap S N) (y : S) : IsUnit (f.toMap y) :=
f.2 y
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_units Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_units
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_add_units AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_addUnits
@[to_additive]
theorem surj (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z : N) : ∃ x : M × S, z * f.toMap x.2 = f.toMap x.1 :=
f.3 z
#align submonoid.localization_map.surj Submonoid.LocalizationMap.surj
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.surj AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.surj
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, and `z w : N`, there exist `z' w' : M` and `d : S`
such that `f z' / f d = z` and `f w' / f d = w`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, and `z w : N`, there exist `z' w' : M` and `d : S`
such that `f z' - f d = z` and `f w' - f d = w`."]
theorem surj₂ (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z w : N) : ∃ z' w' : M, ∃ d : S,
(z * f.toMap d = f.toMap z') ∧ (w * f.toMap d = f.toMap w') := by
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := surj f z
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := surj f w
refine ⟨a.1 * b.2, a.2 * b.1, a.2 * b.2, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [mul_def, map_mul, ← ha]
exact (mul_assoc z _ _).symm
· simp_rw [mul_def, map_mul, ← hb]
exact mul_left_comm w _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_exists (f : LocalizationMap S N) {x y} :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = c * y := Iff.intro (f.4 x y)
fun ⟨c, h⟩ ↦ by
replace h := congr_arg f.toMap h
rw [map_mul, map_mul] at h
exact (f.map_units c).mul_right_inj.mp h
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_exists Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_exists AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, a section function sending `z : N` to some
`(x, y) : M × S` such that `f x * (f y)⁻¹ = z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, a section function sending `z : N`
to some `(x, y) : M × S` such that `f x - f y = z`."]
noncomputable def sec (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z : N) : M × S := Classical.choose <| f.surj z
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec
@[to_additive]
theorem sec_spec {f : LocalizationMap S N} (z : N) :
z * f.toMap (f.sec z).2 = f.toMap (f.sec z).1 := Classical.choose_spec <| f.surj z
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec
@[to_additive]
theorem sec_spec' {f : LocalizationMap S N} (z : N) :
f.toMap (f.sec z).1 = f.toMap (f.sec z).2 * z := by rw [mul_comm, sec_spec]
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec'
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `w * (f y)⁻¹ = z ↔ w = f y * z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `w - f y = z ↔ w = f y + z`."]
theorem mul_inv_left {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) (y : S) (w z : N) :
w * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ = z ↔ w = f y * z := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact Units.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg_left
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `z = w * (f y)⁻¹ ↔ z * f y = w`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `z = w - f y ↔ z + f y = w`."]
theorem mul_inv_right {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) (y : S) (w z : N) :
z = w * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ ↔ z * f y = w := by
rw [eq_comm, mul_inv_left h, mul_comm, eq_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg_right
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all `x₁ x₂ : M` and `y₁, y₂ ∈ S`, we have
`f x₁ * (f y₁)⁻¹ = f x₂ * (f y₂)⁻¹ ↔ f (x₁ * y₂) = f (x₂ * y₁)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `x₁ x₂ : M` and `y₁, y₂ ∈ S`, we have
`f x₁ - f y₁ = f x₂ - f y₂ ↔ f (x₁ + y₂) = f (x₂ + y₁)`."]
theorem mul_inv {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f x₁ * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y₁)⁻¹ =
f x₂ * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y₂)⁻¹ ↔
f (x₁ * y₂) = f (x₂ * y₁) := by
rw [mul_inv_right h, mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f y₂), ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left h, mul_comm x₂,
f.map_mul, f.map_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`y, z ∈ S`, we have `(f y)⁻¹ = (f z)⁻¹ → f y = f z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `y, z ∈ S`, we have `- (f y) = - (f z) → f y = f z`."]
theorem inv_inj {f : M →* N} (hf : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {y z : S}
(h : (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf y)⁻¹ = (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf z)⁻¹) :
f y = f z := by
rw [← mul_one (f y), eq_comm, ← mul_inv_left hf y (f z) 1, h]
exact Units.inv_mul (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf z)⁻¹
#align submonoid.localization_map.inv_inj Submonoid.LocalizationMap.inv_inj
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.neg_inj AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.neg_inj
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`y ∈ S`, `(f y)⁻¹` is unique. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `y ∈ S`, `- (f y)` is unique."]
theorem inv_unique {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {y : S} {z : N} (H : f y * z = 1) :
(IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ = z := by
rw [← one_mul _⁻¹, Units.val_mul, mul_inv_left]
exact H.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.inv_unique Submonoid.LocalizationMap.inv_unique
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.neg_unique AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.neg_unique
variable (f : LocalizationMap S N)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_right_cancel {x y} {c : S} (h : f.toMap (c * x) = f.toMap (c * y)) :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y := by
rw [f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul] at h
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := f.map_units c
rw [← hu] at h
exact (Units.mul_right_inj u).1 h
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_right_cancel Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_right_cancel
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_right_cancel AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_right_cancel
@[to_additive]
theorem map_left_cancel {x y} {c : S} (h : f.toMap (x * c) = f.toMap (y * c)) :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y :=
f.map_right_cancel <| by rw [mul_comm _ x, mul_comm _ y, h]
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_left_cancel Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_left_cancel
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_left_cancel AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_left_cancel
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, the surjection sending `(x, y) : M × S` to
`f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, the surjection sending `(x, y) : M × S`
to `f x - f y`."]
noncomputable def mk' (f : LocalizationMap S N) (x : M) (y : S) : N :=
f.toMap x * ↑(IsUnit.liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units y)⁻¹
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul (x₁ x₂ : M) (y₁ y₂ : S) : f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) (y₁ * y₂) = f.mk' x₁ y₁ * f.mk' x₂ y₂ :=
(mul_inv_left f.map_units _ _ _).2 <|
show _ = _ * (_ * _ * (_ * _)) by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right f.map_units, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ (f.toMap x₂), ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right f.map_units,
Submonoid.coe_mul, f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul]
ac_rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_one (x) : f.mk' x (1 : S) = f.toMap x := by
rw [mk', MonoidHom.map_one]
exact mul_one _
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_one Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_one
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_zero AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_zero
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N` for a submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `z : N` we have that if
`x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`, then `f x * (f y)⁻¹ = z`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `z : N`
we have that if `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`, then `f x - f y = z`."]
theorem mk'_sec (z : N) : f.mk' (f.sec z).1 (f.sec z).2 = z :=
show _ * _ = _ by rw [← sec_spec, mul_inv_left, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_sec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_sec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_sec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_sec
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_surjective (z : N) : ∃ (x : _) (y : S), f.mk' x y = z :=
⟨(f.sec z).1, (f.sec z).2, f.mk'_sec z⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_surjective Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_surjective
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_surjective AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_spec (x) (y : S) : f.mk' x y * f.toMap y = f.toMap x :=
show _ * _ * _ = _ by rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f.toMap y), ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_spec' (x) (y : S) : f.toMap y * f.mk' x y = f.toMap x := by rw [mul_comm, mk'_spec]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq {x} {y : S} {z} : z = f.mk' x y ↔ z * f.toMap y = f.toMap x :=
⟨fun H ↦ by rw [H, mk'_spec], fun H ↦ by erw [mul_inv_right, H]⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_mk'_iff_add_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_mk'_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul {x} {y : S} {z} : f.mk' x y = z ↔ f.toMap x = z * f.toMap y := by
rw [eq_comm, eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, eq_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ f.toMap (y₂ * x₁) = f.toMap (y₁ * x₂) :=
⟨fun H ↦ by
rw [f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul, f.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.1 H,← mul_assoc, mk'_spec',
mul_comm ((toMap f) x₂) _],
fun H ↦ by
rw [mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul, mk', mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f.toMap y₁), ← mul_assoc, ←
f.toMap.map_mul, mul_comm x₂, ← H, ← mul_comm x₁, f.toMap.map_mul,
mul_inv_right f.map_units]⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq' {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ f.toMap (x₁ * y₂) = f.toMap (x₂ * y₁) := by
simp only [f.mk'_eq_iff_eq, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq'
@[to_additive]
protected theorem eq {a₁ b₁} {a₂ b₂ : S} :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑b₂ * a₁) = c * (a₂ * b₁) :=
f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.trans <| f.eq_iff_exists
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq
@[to_additive]
protected theorem eq' {a₁ b₁} {a₂ b₂ : S} :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ ↔ Localization.r S (a₁, a₂) (b₁, b₂) := by
rw [f.eq, Localization.r_iff_exists]
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_eq (g : LocalizationMap S P) {x y} : f.toMap x = f.toMap y ↔ g.toMap x = g.toMap y :=
f.eq_iff_exists.trans g.eq_iff_exists.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq (g : LocalizationMap S P) {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ g.mk' x₁ y₁ = g.mk' x₂ y₂ :=
f.eq'.trans g.eq'.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `x₁ : M` and `y₁ ∈ S`,
if `x₂ : M, y₂ ∈ S` are such that `f x₁ * (f y₁)⁻¹ * f y₂ = f x₂`, then there exists `c ∈ S`
such that `x₁ * y₂ * c = x₂ * y₁ * c`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `x₁ : M`
and `y₁ ∈ S`, if `x₂ : M, y₂ ∈ S` are such that `(f x₁ - f y₁) + f y₂ = f x₂`, then there exists
`c ∈ S` such that `x₁ + y₂ + c = x₂ + y₁ + c`."]
theorem exists_of_sec_mk' (x) (y : S) :
∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑(f.sec <| f.mk' x y).2 * x) = c * (y * (f.sec <| f.mk' x y).1) :=
f.eq_iff_exists.1 <| f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.1 <| (mk'_sec _ _).symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.exists_of_sec_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_sec_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.exists_of_sec_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_sec_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_eq {a₁ b₁ : M} {a₂ b₂ : S} (H : ↑a₂ * b₁ = ↑b₂ * a₁) :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ :=
f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.2 <| H ▸ rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_eq' {a₁ b₁ : M} {a₂ b₂ : S} (H : b₁ * ↑a₂ = a₁ * ↑b₂) :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ :=
f.mk'_eq_of_eq <| by simpa only [mul_comm] using H
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_cancel (a : M) (b c : S) :
f.mk' (a * c) (b * c) = f.mk' a b :=
mk'_eq_of_eq' f (by rw [Submonoid.coe_mul, mul_comm (b:M), mul_assoc])
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_same {a b} {d : S} :
f.mk' a d = f.mk' b d ↔ ∃ c : S, c * a = c * b := by
rw [mk'_eq_iff_eq', map_mul, map_mul, ← eq_iff_exists f]
exact (map_units f d).mul_left_inj
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_self' (y : S) : f.mk' (y : M) y = 1 :=
show _ * _ = _ by rw [mul_inv_left, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_self (x) (H : x ∈ S) : f.mk' x ⟨x, H⟩ = 1 := mk'_self' f ⟨x, H⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul (x₁ x₂) (y : S) : f.toMap x₁ * f.mk' x₂ y = f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) y := by
rw [← mk'_one, ← mk'_mul, one_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_mk'_eq_mk'_of_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_mk'_eq_mk'_of_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul (x₁ x₂) (y : S) : f.mk' x₂ y * f.toMap x₁ = f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) y := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_eq_mk'_of_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_eq_mk'_of_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mk'_one_eq_mk' (x) (y : S) : f.toMap x * f.mk' 1 y = f.mk' x y := by
rw [mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_mk'_one_eq_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_mk'_one_eq_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_mk'_zero_eq_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_mk'_zero_eq_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_mul_cancel_right (x : M) (y : S) : f.mk' (x * y) y = f.toMap x := by
rw [← mul_mk'_one_eq_mk', f.toMap.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_mk'_one_eq_mk', mk'_self', mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_cancel_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_cancel_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_cancel_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul_cancel_left (x) (y : S) : f.mk' ((y : M) * x) y = f.toMap x := by
rw [mul_comm, mk'_mul_cancel_right]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_cancel_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_cancel_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_cancel_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_cancel_left
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_comp (j : N →* P) (y : S) : IsUnit (j.comp f.toMap y) :=
⟨Units.map j <| IsUnit.liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units y,
show j _ = j _ from congr_arg j <| IsUnit.coe_liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units _⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.is_unit_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.isUnit_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.is_add_unit_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.isAddUnit_comp
variable {g : M →* P}
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ Units P`, `f x = f y → g x = g y` for all `x y : M`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g(S) ⊆ AddUnits P`, `f x = f y → g x = g y`
for all `x y : M`."]
theorem eq_of_eq (hg : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (g y)) {x y} (h : f.toMap x = f.toMap y) : g x = g y := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := f.eq_iff_exists.1 h
rw [← one_mul (g x), ← IsUnit.liftRight_inv_mul (g.restrict S) hg c]
show _ * g c * _ = _
rw [mul_assoc, ← g.map_mul, hc, mul_comm, mul_inv_left hg, g.map_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_of_eq
/-- Given `CommMonoid`s `M, P`, Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids
`S, T` respectively, and `g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T`, `f x = f y` implies
`k (g x) = k (g y)`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given `AddCommMonoid`s `M, P`, Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids
`S, T` respectively, and `g : M →+ P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T`, `f x = f y`
implies `k (g x) = k (g y)`."]
theorem comp_eq_of_eq {T : Submonoid P} {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q] (hg : ∀ y : S, g y ∈ T)
(k : LocalizationMap T Q) {x y} (h : f.toMap x = f.toMap y) : k.toMap (g x) = k.toMap (g y) :=
f.eq_of_eq (fun y : S ↦ show IsUnit (k.toMap.comp g y) from k.map_units ⟨g y, hg y⟩) h
#align submonoid.localization_map.comp_eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.comp_eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.comp_eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.comp_eq_of_eq
variable (hg : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (g y))
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism induced from
`N` to `P` sending `z : N` to `g x * (g y)⁻¹`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such that
`z = f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N` for a submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism
induced from `N` to `P` sending `z : N` to `g x - g y`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such that
`z = f x - f y`."]
noncomputable def lift : N →* P where
toFun z := g (f.sec z).1 * (IsUnit.liftRight (g.restrict S) hg (f.sec z).2)⁻¹
map_one' := by rw [mul_inv_left, mul_one]; exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by rw [← sec_spec, one_mul])
map_mul' x y := by
dsimp only
rw [mul_inv_left hg, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right hg, mul_comm _ (g (f.sec y).1), ←
mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right hg]
repeat rw [← g.map_mul]
exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by simp_rw [f.toMap.map_mul, sec_spec']; ac_rfl)
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism induced from
`N` to `P` maps `f x * (f y)⁻¹` to `g x * (g y)⁻¹` for all `x : M, y ∈ S`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism
induced from `N` to `P` maps `f x - f y` to `g x - g y` for all `x : M, y ∈ S`."]
theorem lift_mk' (x y) : f.lift hg (f.mk' x y) = g x * (IsUnit.liftRight (g.restrict S) hg y)⁻¹ :=
(mul_inv hg).2 <|
f.eq_of_eq hg <| by
simp_rw [f.toMap.map_mul, sec_spec', mul_assoc, f.mk'_spec, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N, v : P`, we have
`f.lift hg z = v ↔ g x = g y * v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an
`AddCommMonoid` map `g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all
`z : N, v : P`, we have `f.lift hg z = v ↔ g x = g y + v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_spec (z v) : f.lift hg z = v ↔ g (f.sec z).1 = g (f.sec z).2 * v :=
mul_inv_left hg _ _ v
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N, v w : P`, we have
`f.lift hg z * w = v ↔ g x * w = g y * v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid` map
`g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all
`z : N, v w : P`, we have `f.lift hg z + w = v ↔ g x + w = g y + v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such
that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_spec_mul (z w v) : f.lift hg z * w = v ↔ g (f.sec z).1 * w = g (f.sec z).2 * v := by
erw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left hg, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec_add
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_mk'_spec (x v) (y : S) : f.lift hg (f.mk' x y) = v ↔ g x = g y * v := by
rw [f.lift_mk' hg]; exact mul_inv_left hg _ _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk'_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk'_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'_spec
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`f.lift hg z * g y = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid`
map `g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`f.lift hg z + g y = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_mul_right (z) : f.lift hg z * g (f.sec z).2 = g (f.sec z).1 := by
erw [mul_assoc, IsUnit.liftRight_inv_mul, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mul_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mul_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_add_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_add_right
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`g y * f.lift hg z = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid` map
`g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`g y + f.lift hg z = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_mul_left (z) : g (f.sec z).2 * f.lift hg z = g (f.sec z).1 := by
rw [mul_comm, lift_mul_right]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mul_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mul_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_add_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_eq (x : M) : f.lift hg (f.toMap x) = g x := by
rw [lift_spec, ← g.map_mul]; exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by rw [sec_spec', f.toMap.map_mul])
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_eq_iff {x y : M × S} :
f.lift hg (f.mk' x.1 x.2) = f.lift hg (f.mk' y.1 y.2) ↔ g (x.1 * y.2) = g (y.1 * x.2) := by
rw [lift_mk', lift_mk', mul_inv hg]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp : (f.lift hg).comp f.toMap = g := by ext; exact f.lift_eq hg _
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_of_comp (j : N →* P) : f.lift (f.isUnit_comp j) = j := by
ext
rw [lift_spec]
show j _ = j _ * _
erw [← j.map_mul, sec_spec']
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_of_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_of_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_of_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_of_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem epic_of_localizationMap {j k : N →* P} (h : ∀ a, j.comp f.toMap a = k.comp f.toMap a) :
j = k := by
rw [← f.lift_of_comp j, ← f.lift_of_comp k]
congr 1 with x; exact h x
#align submonoid.localization_map.epic_of_localization_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.epic_of_localizationMap
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.epic_of_localization_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.epic_of_localizationMap
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_unique {j : N →* P} (hj : ∀ x, j (f.toMap x) = g x) : f.lift hg = j := by
ext
rw [lift_spec, ← hj, ← hj, ← j.map_mul]
apply congr_arg
rw [← sec_spec']
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_unique Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_unique
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_unique AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_unique
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_id (x) : f.lift f.map_units x = x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (f.lift_of_comp <| MonoidHom.id N) x
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_id Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_id
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_id AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_id
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and
`k : M →* Q` for a Submonoid `T ⊆ M`, such that `S ≤ T`, and we have
`l : M →* A`, the composition of the induced map `f.lift` for `k` with
the induced map `k.lift` for `l` is equal to the induced map `f.lift` for `l`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and
`k : M →+ Q` for a Submonoid `T ⊆ M`, such that `S ≤ T`, and we have
`l : M →+ A`, the composition of the induced map `f.lift` for `k` with
the induced map `k.lift` for `l` is equal to the induced map `f.lift` for `l`"]
theorem lift_comp_lift {T : Submonoid M} (hST : S ≤ T) {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q]
(k : LocalizationMap T Q) {A : Type*} [CommMonoid A] {l : M →* A}
(hl : ∀ w : T, IsUnit (l w)) :
(k.lift hl).comp (f.lift (map_units k ⟨_, hST ·.2⟩)) =
f.lift (hl ⟨_, hST ·.2⟩) := .symm <|
lift_unique _ _ fun x ↦ by rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply,
MonoidHom.comp_assoc, lift_comp, lift_comp]
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_comp_lift_eq {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q] (k : LocalizationMap S Q)
{A : Type*} [CommMonoid A] {l : M →* A} (hl : ∀ w : S, IsUnit (l w)) :
(k.lift hl).comp (f.lift k.map_units) = f.lift hl :=
lift_comp_lift f le_rfl k hl
/-- Given two Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : M →* P` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, the hom
from `P` to `N` induced by `f` is left inverse to the hom from `N` to `P` induced by `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Given two Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : M →+ P` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, the hom
from `P` to `N` induced by `f` is left inverse to the hom from `N` to `P` induced by `k`."]
theorem lift_left_inverse {k : LocalizationMap S P} (z : N) :
k.lift f.map_units (f.lift k.map_units z) = z :=
(DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_comp_lift_eq f k f.map_units) z).trans (lift_id f z)
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_left_inverse Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_left_inverse
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_left_inverse AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_left_inverse
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_surjective_iff :
Function.Surjective (f.lift hg) ↔ ∀ v : P, ∃ x : M × S, v * g x.2 = g x.1 := by
constructor
· intro H v
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := H v
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := f.surj z
use x
rw [← hz, f.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq.2 hx, lift_mk', mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (g ↑x.2)]
erw [IsUnit.mul_liftRight_inv (g.restrict S) hg, mul_one]
· intro H v
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := H v
use f.mk' x.1 x.2
rw [lift_mk', mul_inv_left hg, mul_comm, ← hx]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_surjective_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_surjective_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_surjective_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_surjective_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_injective_iff :
Function.Injective (f.lift hg) ↔ ∀ x y, f.toMap x = f.toMap y ↔ g x = g y := by
constructor
· intro H x y
constructor
· exact f.eq_of_eq hg
· intro h
rw [← f.lift_eq hg, ← f.lift_eq hg] at h
exact H h
· intro H z w h
obtain ⟨_, _⟩ := f.surj z
obtain ⟨_, _⟩ := f.surj w
rw [← f.mk'_sec z, ← f.mk'_sec w]
exact (mul_inv f.map_units).2 ((H _ _).2 <| (mul_inv hg).1 h)
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_injective_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_injective_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_injective_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_injective_iff
variable {T : Submonoid P} (hy : ∀ y : S, g y ∈ T) {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q]
(k : LocalizationMap T Q)
/-- Given a `CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P` where for Submonoids `S ⊆ M, T ⊆ P` we have
`g(S) ⊆ T`, the induced Monoid homomorphism from the Localization of `M` at `S` to the
Localization of `P` at `T`: if `f : M →* N` and `k : P →* Q` are Localization maps for `S` and
`T` respectively, we send `z : N` to `k (g x) * (k (g y))⁻¹`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such
that `z = f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an `AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P` where for Submonoids `S ⊆ M, T ⊆ P` we have
`g(S) ⊆ T`, the induced AddMonoid homomorphism from the Localization of `M` at `S` to the
Localization of `P` at `T`: if `f : M →+ N` and `k : P →+ Q` are Localization maps for `S` and
`T` respectively, we send `z : N` to `k (g x) - k (g y)`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such
that `z = f x - f y`."]
noncomputable def map : N →* Q :=
@lift _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f (k.toMap.comp g) fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map
variable {k}
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq (x) : f.map hy k (f.toMap x) = k.toMap (g x) :=
f.lift_eq (fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩) x
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comp : (f.map hy k).comp f.toMap = k.toMap.comp g :=
f.lift_comp fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mk' (x) (y : S) : f.map hy k (f.mk' x y) = k.mk' (g x) ⟨g y, hy y⟩ := by
rw [map, lift_mk', mul_inv_left]
show k.toMap (g x) = k.toMap (g y) * _
rw [mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul]
exact (k.mk'_mul_cancel_left (g x) ⟨g y, hy y⟩).symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_mk'
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if a
`CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →* Q`, then for all `z : N`,
`u : Q`, we have `f.map hy k z = u ↔ k (g x) = k (g y) * u` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if an
`AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →+ Q`, then for all `z : N`,
`u : Q`, we have `f.map hy k z = u ↔ k (g x) = k (g y) + u` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem map_spec (z u) : f.map hy k z = u ↔ k.toMap (g (f.sec z).1) = k.toMap (g (f.sec z).2) * u :=
f.lift_spec (fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩) _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_spec
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if a
`CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →* Q`, then for all `z : N`,
we have `f.map hy k z * k (g y) = k (g x)` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if an
`AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →+ Q`, then for all `z : N`,
we have `f.map hy k z + k (g y) = k (g x)` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem map_mul_right (z) : f.map hy k z * k.toMap (g (f.sec z).2) = k.toMap (g (f.sec z).1) :=
f.lift_mul_right (fun y ↦ k.map_units ⟨g y, hy y⟩) _
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_mul_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_mul_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_add_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_add_right
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, if a
`CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →* Q`, then for all `z : N`,
we have `k (g y) * f.map hy k z = k (g x)` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively if an
`AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P` induces a `f.map hy k : N →+ Q`, then for all `z : N`,
we have `k (g y) + f.map hy k z = k (g x)` where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem map_mul_left (z) : k.toMap (g (f.sec z).2) * f.map hy k z = k.toMap (g (f.sec z).1) := by
rw [mul_comm, f.map_mul_right]
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_mul_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_mul_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_add_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id (z : N) : f.map (fun y ↦ show MonoidHom.id M y ∈ S from y.2) f z = z :=
f.lift_id z
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_id Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_id
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_id AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_id
/-- If `CommMonoid` homs `g : M →* P, l : P →* A` induce maps of localizations, the composition
of the induced maps equals the map of localizations induced by `l ∘ g`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `AddCommMonoid` homs `g : M →+ P, l : P →+ A` induce maps of localizations, the composition
of the induced maps equals the map of localizations induced by `l ∘ g`."]
theorem map_comp_map {A : Type*} [CommMonoid A] {U : Submonoid A} {R} [CommMonoid R]
(j : LocalizationMap U R) {l : P →* A} (hl : ∀ w : T, l w ∈ U) :
(k.map hl j).comp (f.map hy k) =
f.map (fun x ↦ show l.comp g x ∈ U from hl ⟨g x, hy x⟩) j := by
ext z
show j.toMap _ * _ = j.toMap (l _) * _
rw [mul_inv_left, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right]
show j.toMap _ * j.toMap (l (g _)) = j.toMap (l _) * _
rw [← j.toMap.map_mul, ← j.toMap.map_mul, ← l.map_mul, ← l.map_mul]
exact
k.comp_eq_of_eq hl j
(by rw [k.toMap.map_mul, k.toMap.map_mul, sec_spec', mul_assoc, map_mul_right])
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_comp_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_comp_map
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_comp_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_comp_map
/-- If `CommMonoid` homs `g : M →* P, l : P →* A` induce maps of localizations, the composition
of the induced maps equals the map of localizations induced by `l ∘ g`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `AddCommMonoid` homs `g : M →+ P, l : P →+ A` induce maps of localizations, the composition
of the induced maps equals the map of localizations induced by `l ∘ g`."]
theorem map_map {A : Type*} [CommMonoid A] {U : Submonoid A} {R} [CommMonoid R]
(j : LocalizationMap U R) {l : P →* A} (hl : ∀ w : T, l w ∈ U) (x) :
k.map hl j (f.map hy k x) = f.map (fun x ↦ show l.comp g x ∈ U from hl ⟨g x, hy x⟩) j x := by
-- Porting note: Lean has a hard time figuring out what the implicit arguments should be
-- when calling `map_comp_map`. Hence the original line below has to be replaced by a much more
-- explicit one
-- rw [← f.map_comp_map hy j hl]
rw [← @map_comp_map M _ S N _ P _ f g T hy Q _ k A _ U R _ j l hl]
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, comp_apply]
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_map
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_map
/-- Given an injective `CommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →* P`, and a submonoid `S ⊆ M`,
the induced monoid homomorphism from the localization of `M` at `S` to the
localization of `P` at `g S`, is injective.
-/
@[to_additive "Given an injective `AddCommMonoid` homomorphism `g : M →+ P`, and a
submonoid `S ⊆ M`, the induced monoid homomorphism from the localization of `M` at `S`
to the localization of `P` at `g S`, is injective. "]
theorem map_injective_of_injective (hg : Injective g) (k : LocalizationMap (S.map g) Q) :
Injective (map f (apply_coe_mem_map g S) k) := fun z w hizw ↦ by
set i := map f (apply_coe_mem_map g S) k
have ifkg (a : M) : i (f.toMap a) = k.toMap (g a) := map_eq f (apply_coe_mem_map g S) a
let ⟨z', w', x, hxz, hxw⟩ := surj₂ f z w
have : k.toMap (g z') = k.toMap (g w') := by
rw [← ifkg, ← ifkg, ← hxz, ← hxw, map_mul, map_mul, hizw]
obtain ⟨⟨_, c, hc, rfl⟩, eq⟩ := k.exists_of_eq _ _ this
simp_rw [← map_mul, hg.eq_iff] at eq
rw [← (f.map_units x).mul_left_inj, hxz, hxw, f.eq_iff_exists]
exact ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, eq⟩
section AwayMap
variable (x : M)
/-- Given `x : M`, the type of `CommMonoid` homomorphisms `f : M →* N` such that `N`
is isomorphic to the Localization of `M` at the Submonoid generated by `x`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Given `x : M`, the type of `AddCommMonoid` homomorphisms `f : M →+ N` such that `N`
is isomorphic to the localization of `M` at the AddSubmonoid generated by `x`."]
def AwayMap (N' : Type*) [CommMonoid N'] := LocalizationMap (powers x) N'
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap
variable (F : AwayMap x N)
/-- Given `x : M` and a Localization map `F : M →* N` away from `x`, `invSelf` is `(F x)⁻¹`. -/
noncomputable def AwayMap.invSelf : N := F.mk' 1 ⟨x, mem_powers _⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map.inv_self Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.invSelf
/-- Given `x : M`, a Localization map `F : M →* N` away from `x`, and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g x` is invertible, the homomorphism induced from `N` to `P` sending
`z : N` to `g y * (g x)⁻ⁿ`, where `y : M, n : ℕ` are such that `z = F y * (F x)⁻ⁿ`. -/
noncomputable def AwayMap.lift (hg : IsUnit (g x)) : N →* P :=
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift F fun y ↦
show IsUnit (g y.1) by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := y.2
rw [← hn, g.map_pow]
exact IsUnit.pow n hg
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift
@[simp]
theorem AwayMap.lift_eq (hg : IsUnit (g x)) (a : M) : F.lift x hg (F.toMap a) = g a :=
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq _ _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift_eq
@[simp]
theorem AwayMap.lift_comp (hg : IsUnit (g x)) : (F.lift x hg).comp F.toMap = g :=
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift_comp
/-- Given `x y : M` and Localization maps `F : M →* N, G : M →* P` away from `x` and `x * y`
respectively, the homomorphism induced from `N` to `P`. -/
noncomputable def awayToAwayRight (y : M) (G : AwayMap (x * y) P) : N →* P :=
F.lift x <|
show IsUnit (G.toMap x) from
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one (G.toMap x) (G.mk' y ⟨x * y, mem_powers _⟩) <| by
rw [mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, mk'_self]
#align submonoid.localization_map.away_to_away_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.awayToAwayRight
end AwayMap
end LocalizationMap
end Submonoid
namespace AddSubmonoid
namespace LocalizationMap
section AwayMap
variable {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] (x : A) {B : Type*} [AddCommMonoid B] (F : AwayMap x B)
{C : Type*} [AddCommMonoid C] {g : A →+ C}
/-- Given `x : A` and a Localization map `F : A →+ B` away from `x`, `neg_self` is `- (F x)`. -/
noncomputable def AwayMap.negSelf : B :=
F.mk' 0 ⟨x, mem_multiples _⟩
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map.neg_self AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.negSelf
/-- Given `x : A`, a localization map `F : A →+ B` away from `x`, and a map of `AddCommMonoid`s
`g : A →+ C` such that `g x` is invertible, the homomorphism induced from `B` to `C` sending
`z : B` to `g y - n • g x`, where `y : A, n : ℕ` are such that `z = F y - n • F x`. -/
noncomputable def AwayMap.lift (hg : IsAddUnit (g x)) : B →+ C :=
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift F fun y ↦
show IsAddUnit (g y.1) by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := y.2
rw [← hn]
dsimp
rw [g.map_nsmul]
exact IsAddUnit.map (nsmulAddMonoidHom n : C →+ C) hg
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift
@[simp]
theorem AwayMap.lift_eq (hg : IsAddUnit (g x)) (a : A) : F.lift x hg (F.toMap a) = g a :=
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq _ _ _
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift_eq
@[simp]
theorem AwayMap.lift_comp (hg : IsAddUnit (g x)) : (F.lift x hg).comp F.toMap = g :=
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp _ _
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_map.lift_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.AwayMap.lift_comp
/-- Given `x y : A` and Localization maps `F : A →+ B, G : A →+ C` away from `x` and `x + y`
respectively, the homomorphism induced from `B` to `C`. -/
noncomputable def awayToAwayRight (y : A) (G : AwayMap (x + y) C) : B →+ C :=
F.lift x <|
show IsAddUnit (G.toMap x) from
isAddUnit_of_add_eq_zero (G.toMap x) (G.mk' y ⟨x + y, mem_multiples _⟩) <| by
rw [add_mk'_eq_mk'_of_add, mk'_self]
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.away_to_away_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.awayToAwayRight
end AwayMap
end LocalizationMap
end AddSubmonoid
namespace Submonoid
namespace LocalizationMap
variable (f : S.LocalizationMap N) {g : M →* P} (hg : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (g y)) {T : Submonoid P}
{Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q]
/-- If `f : M →* N` and `k : M →* P` are Localization maps for a Submonoid `S`, we get an
isomorphism of `N` and `P`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f : M →+ N` and `k : M →+ R` are Localization maps for an AddSubmonoid `S`, we get an
isomorphism of `N` and `R`."]
noncomputable def mulEquivOfLocalizations (k : LocalizationMap S P) : N ≃* P :=
{ toFun := f.lift k.map_units
invFun := k.lift f.map_units
left_inv := f.lift_left_inverse
right_inv := k.lift_left_inverse
map_mul' := MonoidHom.map_mul _ }
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_apply {k : LocalizationMap S P} {x} :
f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k x = f.lift k.map_units x := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_symm_apply {k : LocalizationMap S P} {x} :
(f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k).symm x = k.lift f.map_units x := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_symm_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_symm_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_symm_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_symm_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_symm_eq_mulEquivOfLocalizations {k : LocalizationMap S P} :
(k.mulEquivOfLocalizations f).symm = f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_symm_eq_mul_equiv_of_localizations Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_symm_eq_mulEquivOfLocalizations
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_symm_eq_add_equiv_of_localizations AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_symm_eq_addEquivOfLocalizations
/-- If `f : M →* N` is a Localization map for a Submonoid `S` and `k : N ≃* P` is an isomorphism
of `CommMonoid`s, `k ∘ f` is a Localization map for `M` at `S`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f : M →+ N` is a Localization map for a Submonoid `S` and `k : N ≃+ P` is an isomorphism
of `AddCommMonoid`s, `k ∘ f` is a Localization map for `M` at `S`."]
def ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (k : N ≃* P) : LocalizationMap S P :=
(k.toMonoidHom.comp f.toMap).toLocalizationMap (fun y ↦ isUnit_comp f k.toMonoidHom y)
(fun v ↦
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := k.toEquiv.surjective v
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := f.surj z
⟨x, show v * k _ = k _ by rw [← hx, k.map_mul, ← hz]; rfl⟩)
fun x y ↦ (k.apply_eq_iff_eq.trans f.eq_iff_exists).1
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply {k : N ≃* P} (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap x = k (f.toMap x) := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_eq {k : N ≃* P} :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap = k.toMonoidHom.comp f.toMap := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem symm_comp_ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply {k : N ≃* P} (x) :
k.symm ((f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap x) = f.toMap x := k.symm_apply_apply (f.toMap x)
#align submonoid.localization_map.symm_comp_of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.symm_comp_ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.symm_comp_of_add_equiv_of_localizations_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.symm_comp_ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem symm_comp_ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply' {k : P ≃* N} (x) :
k ((f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k.symm).toMap x) = f.toMap x := k.apply_symm_apply (f.toMap x)
#align submonoid.localization_map.symm_comp_of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_apply' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.symm_comp_ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_apply'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.symm_comp_of_add_equiv_of_localizations_apply' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.symm_comp_ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_apply'
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_eq_iff_eq {k : N ≃* P} {x y} :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap x = y ↔ f.toMap x = k.symm y :=
k.toEquiv.eq_symm_apply.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_eq_iff_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_eq_iff_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_eq_iff_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive addEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv (k : LocalizationMap S P) :
f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k) = k :=
toMap_injective <| f.lift_comp k.map_units
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_right_inv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_right_inv AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[to_additive addEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv_apply]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv_apply {k : LocalizationMap S P} {x} :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (f.mulEquivOfLocalizations k)).toMap x = k.toMap x := by simp
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_right_inv_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_right_inv_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_left_inv (k : N ≃* P) :
f.mulEquivOfLocalizations (f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k) = k :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (f.lift_of_comp k.toMonoidHom) x
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_left_inv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_left_inv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_left_neg AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_left_neg
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfLocalizations_left_inv_apply {k : N ≃* P} (x) :
f.mulEquivOfLocalizations (f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k) x = k x := by simp
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_localizations_left_inv_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfLocalizations_left_inv_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_localizations_left_neg_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfLocalizations_left_neg_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_id : f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (MulEquiv.refl N) = f := by
ext; rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_id Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_id
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_id AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_id
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_comp {k : N ≃* P} {j : P ≃* Q} :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (k.trans j)).toMap =
j.toMonoidHom.comp (f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations k).toMap := by
ext; rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_localizations_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_localizations_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfLocalizations_comp
/-- Given `CommMonoid`s `M, P` and Submonoids `S ⊆ M, T ⊆ P`, if `f : M →* N` is a Localization
map for `S` and `k : P ≃* M` is an isomorphism of `CommMonoid`s such that `k(T) = S`, `f ∘ k`
is a Localization map for `T`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given `AddCommMonoid`s `M, P` and `AddSubmonoid`s `S ⊆ M, T ⊆ P`, if `f : M →* N` is a
Localization map for `S` and `k : P ≃+ M` is an isomorphism of `AddCommMonoid`s such that
`k(T) = S`, `f ∘ k` is a Localization map for `T`."]
def ofMulEquivOfDom {k : P ≃* M} (H : T.map k.toMonoidHom = S) : LocalizationMap T N :=
let H' : S.comap k.toMonoidHom = T :=
H ▸ (SetLike.coe_injective <| T.1.1.preimage_image_eq k.toEquiv.injective)
(f.toMap.comp k.toMonoidHom).toLocalizationMap
(fun y ↦
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := f.map_units ⟨k y, H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem k y.2⟩
⟨z, hz⟩)
(fun z ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := f.surj z
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := k.toEquiv.surjective x.1
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := k.toEquiv.surjective x.2
⟨(v, ⟨w, H' ▸ show k w ∈ S from hw.symm ▸ x.2.2⟩),
show z * f.toMap (k.toEquiv w) = f.toMap (k.toEquiv v) by erw [hv, hw, hx]⟩)
fun x y ↦
show f.toMap _ = f.toMap _ → _ by
erw [f.eq_iff_exists]
exact
fun ⟨c, hc⟩ ↦
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := k.toEquiv.surjective c
⟨⟨d, H' ▸ show k d ∈ S from hd.symm ▸ c.2⟩, by
erw [← hd, ← k.map_mul, ← k.map_mul] at hc; exact k.toEquiv.injective hc⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_apply {k : P ≃* M} (H : T.map k.toMonoidHom = S) (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfDom H).toMap x = f.toMap (k x) := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_eq {k : P ≃* M} (H : T.map k.toMonoidHom = S) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfDom H).toMap = f.toMap.comp k.toMonoidHom := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_comp_symm {k : P ≃* M} (H : T.map k.toMonoidHom = S) (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfDom H).toMap (k.symm x) = f.toMap x :=
congr_arg f.toMap <| k.apply_symm_apply x
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_comp_symm Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_comp_symm
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_comp_symm AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_comp_symm
@[to_additive]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_comp {k : M ≃* P} (H : T.map k.symm.toMonoidHom = S) (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfDom H).toMap (k x) = f.toMap x := congr_arg f.toMap <| k.symm_apply_apply x
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_comp
/-- A special case of `f ∘ id = f`, `f` a Localization map. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "A special case of `f ∘ id = f`, `f` a Localization map."]
theorem ofMulEquivOfDom_id :
f.ofMulEquivOfDom
(show S.map (MulEquiv.refl M).toMonoidHom = S from
Submonoid.ext fun x ↦ ⟨fun ⟨_, hy, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ hy, fun h ↦ ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩) = f := by
ext; rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_dom_id Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ofMulEquivOfDom_id
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_dom_id AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ofAddEquivOfDom_id
/-- Given Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* U` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, an
isomorphism `j : M ≃* P` such that `j(S) = T` induces an isomorphism of localizations `N ≃* U`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ U` for Submonoids `S, T` respectively, an
isomorphism `j : M ≃+ P` such that `j(S) = T` induces an isomorphism of localizations `N ≃+ U`."]
noncomputable def mulEquivOfMulEquiv (k : LocalizationMap T Q) {j : M ≃* P}
(H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) : N ≃* Q :=
f.mulEquivOfLocalizations <| k.ofMulEquivOfDom H
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq_map_apply {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P}
(H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) (x) :
f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H x =
f.map (fun y : S ↦ show j.toMonoidHom y ∈ T from H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2) k x := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_eq_map_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq_map_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv_eq_map_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv_eq_map_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq_map {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P}
(H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) :
(f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H).toMonoidHom =
f.map (fun y : S ↦ show j.toMonoidHom y ∈ T from H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2) k := rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_eq_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq_map
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv_eq_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv_eq_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P} (H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T)
(x) :
f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H (f.toMap x) = k.toMap (j x) :=
f.map_eq (fun y : S ↦ H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2) _
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mulEquivOfMulEquiv_mk' {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P} (H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T)
(x y) :
f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H (f.mk' x y) = k.mk' (j x) ⟨j y, H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2⟩ :=
f.map_mk' (fun y : S ↦ H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem j y.2) _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mulEquivOfMulEquiv_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_equiv_of_add_equiv_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.addEquivOfAddEquiv_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv_apply {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P}
(H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) (x) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H)).toMap x = k.toMap (j x) :=
ext_iff.1 (f.mulEquivOfLocalizations_right_inv (k.ofMulEquivOfDom H)) x
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv_apply Submonoid.LocalizationMap.of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv_apply
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_add_equiv_apply AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.of_addEquivOfAddEquiv_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv {k : LocalizationMap T Q} {j : M ≃* P} (H : S.map j.toMonoidHom = T) :
(f.ofMulEquivOfLocalizations (f.mulEquivOfMulEquiv k H)).toMap = k.toMap.comp j.toMonoidHom :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv_apply H
#align submonoid.localization_map.of_mul_equiv_of_mul_equiv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.of_mulEquivOfMulEquiv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.of_add_equiv_of_add_equiv AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.of_addEquivOfAddEquiv
@[to_additive]
theorem toMap_injective_iff (f : LocalizationMap S N) :
Injective (LocalizationMap.toMap f) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ S → IsLeftRegular x := by
rw [Injective]
constructor <;> intro h
· intro x hx y z hyz
simp_rw [LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists] at h
apply (fun y z _ => h) y z x
lift x to S using hx
use x
· intro a b hab
rw [LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists] at hab
obtain ⟨c,hc⟩ := hab
apply (fun x a => h a) c (SetLike.coe_mem c) hc
end LocalizationMap
end Submonoid
namespace Localization
variable (S)
/-- Natural homomorphism sending `x : M`, `M` a `CommMonoid`, to the equivalence class of
`(x, 1)` in the Localization of `M` at a Submonoid. -/
@[to_additive
"Natural homomorphism sending `x : M`, `M` an `AddCommMonoid`, to the equivalence class of
`(x, 0)` in the Localization of `M` at a Submonoid."]
def monoidOf : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S (Localization S) :=
{ (r S).mk'.comp <| MonoidHom.inl M
S with
toFun := fun x ↦ mk x 1
map_one' := mk_one
map_mul' := fun x y ↦ by dsimp only; rw [mk_mul, mul_one]
map_units' := fun y ↦
isUnit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨mk 1 y, by dsimp only; rw [mk_mul, mul_one, one_mul, mk_self]⟩
surj' := fun z ↦ induction_on z fun x ↦
⟨x, by dsimp only; rw [mk_mul, mul_comm x.fst, ← mk_mul, mk_self, one_mul]⟩
exists_of_eq := fun x y ↦ Iff.mp <|
mk_eq_mk_iff.trans <|
r_iff_exists.trans <|
show (∃ c : S, ↑c * (1 * x) = c * (1 * y)) ↔ _ by rw [one_mul, one_mul] }
#align localization.monoid_of Localization.monoidOf
#align add_localization.add_monoid_of AddLocalization.addMonoidOf
variable {S}
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk (x) : mk x 1 = (monoidOf S).toMap x := rfl
#align localization.mk_one_eq_monoid_of_mk Localization.mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk
#align add_localization.mk_zero_eq_add_monoid_of_mk AddLocalization.mk_zero_eq_addMonoidOf_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply (x y) : mk x y = (monoidOf S).mk' x y :=
show _ = _ * _ from
(Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv_right (monoidOf S).map_units _ _ _).2 <| by
rw [← mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk, ← mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk, mk_mul x y y 1, mul_comm y 1]
conv => rhs; rw [← mul_one 1]; rw [← mul_one x]
exact mk_eq_mk_iff.2 (Con.symm _ <| (Localization.r S).mul (Con.refl _ (x, 1)) <| one_rel _)
#align localization.mk_eq_monoid_of_mk'_apply Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply
#align add_localization.mk_eq_add_monoid_of_mk'_apply AddLocalization.mk_eq_addMonoidOf_mk'_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_eq_monoidOf_mk' : mk = (monoidOf S).mk' :=
funext fun _ ↦ funext fun _ ↦ mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply _ _
#align localization.mk_eq_monoid_of_mk' Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'
#align add_localization.mk_eq_add_monoid_of_mk' AddLocalization.mk_eq_addMonoidOf_mk'
universe u
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOn_mk' {p : Sort u} (f : M → S → p) (H) (a : M) (b : S) :
liftOn ((monoidOf S).mk' a b) f H = f a b := by rw [← mk_eq_monoidOf_mk', liftOn_mk]
#align localization.lift_on_mk' Localization.liftOn_mk'
#align add_localization.lift_on_mk' AddLocalization.liftOn_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOn₂_mk' {p : Sort*} (f : M → S → M → S → p) (H) (a c : M) (b d : S) :
liftOn₂ ((monoidOf S).mk' a b) ((monoidOf S).mk' c d) f H = f a b c d := by
rw [← mk_eq_monoidOf_mk', liftOn₂_mk]
#align localization.lift_on₂_mk' Localization.liftOn₂_mk'
#align add_localization.lift_on₂_mk' AddLocalization.liftOn₂_mk'
variable (f : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S N)
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S`, we get an isomorphism between
the Localization of `M` at `S` as a quotient type and `N`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S`, we get an isomorphism between
the Localization of `M` at `S` as a quotient type and `N`."]
noncomputable def mulEquivOfQuotient (f : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S N) : Localization S ≃* N :=
(monoidOf S).mulEquivOfLocalizations f
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient
variable {f}
-- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_apply (x) : mulEquivOfQuotient f x = (monoidOf S).lift f.map_units x :=
rfl
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient_apply Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient_apply
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient_apply AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_mk' (x y) : mulEquivOfQuotient f ((monoidOf S).mk' x y) = f.mk' x y :=
(monoidOf S).lift_mk' _ _ _
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient_mk' Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient_mk'
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient_mk' AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_mk (x y) : mulEquivOfQuotient f (mk x y) = f.mk' x y := by
rw [mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply]; exact mulEquivOfQuotient_mk' _ _
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient_mk Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient_mk
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient_mk AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient_mk
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_monoidOf (x) :
mulEquivOfQuotient f ((monoidOf S).toMap x) = f.toMap x := by simp
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient_monoid_of Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient_monoidOf
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient_add_monoid_of AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient_addMonoidOf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_symm_mk' (x y) :
(mulEquivOfQuotient f).symm (f.mk' x y) = (monoidOf S).mk' x y :=
f.lift_mk' (monoidOf S).map_units _ _
#align localization.mul_equiv_of_quotient_symm_mk' Localization.mulEquivOfQuotient_symm_mk'
#align add_localization.add_equiv_of_quotient_symm_mk' AddLocalization.addEquivOfQuotient_symm_mk'
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/MonoidLocalization.lean | 1,795 | 1,796 | theorem mulEquivOfQuotient_symm_mk (x y) : (mulEquivOfQuotient f).symm (f.mk' x y) = mk x y := by |
rw [mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply]; exact mulEquivOfQuotient_symm_mk' _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Kevin Klinge, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OreLocalization.OreSet
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.ore_localization.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"861a26926586cd46ff80264d121cdb6fa0e35cc1"
/-!
# Localization over left Ore sets.
This file defines the localization of a monoid over a left Ore set and proves its universal
mapping property.
## Notations
Introduces the notation `R[S⁻¹]` for the Ore localization of a monoid `R` at a right Ore
subset `S`. Also defines a new heterogeneous division notation `r /ₒ s` for a numerator `r : R` and
a denominator `s : S`.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Ore+localization>
* [Zoran Škoda, *Noncommutative localization in noncommutative geometry*][skoda2006]
## Tags
localization, Ore, non-commutative
-/
universe u
open OreLocalization
namespace OreLocalization
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] (S : Submonoid R) [OreSet S] (X) [MulAction R X]
/-- The setoid on `R × S` used for the Ore localization. -/
@[to_additive AddOreLocalization.oreEqv "The setoid on `R × S` used for the Ore localization."]
def oreEqv : Setoid (X × S) where
r rs rs' := ∃ (u : S) (v : R), u • rs'.1 = v • rs.1 ∧ u * rs'.2 = v * rs.2
iseqv := by
refine ⟨fun _ => ⟨1, 1, by simp⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨r, s⟩ ⟨r', s'⟩ ⟨u, v, hru, hsu⟩; dsimp only at *
rcases oreCondition (s : R) s' with ⟨r₂, s₂, h₁⟩
rcases oreCondition r₂ u with ⟨r₃, s₃, h₂⟩
have : r₃ * v * s = s₃ * s₂ * s := by
-- Porting note: the proof used `assoc_rw`
rw [mul_assoc _ (s₂ : R), h₁, ← mul_assoc, h₂, mul_assoc, ← hsu, ← mul_assoc]
rcases ore_right_cancel (r₃ * v) (s₃ * s₂) s this with ⟨w, hw⟩
refine ⟨w * (s₃ * s₂), w * (r₃ * u), ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul, Submonoid.smul_def, ← hw]
· simp only [mul_smul, hru, ← Submonoid.smul_def]
· simp only [mul_assoc, hsu]
· rintro ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂⟩ ⟨r₃, s₃⟩ ⟨u, v, hur₁, hs₁u⟩ ⟨u', v', hur₂, hs₂u⟩
rcases oreCondition v' u with ⟨r', s', h⟩; dsimp only at *
refine ⟨s' * u', r' * v, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, mul_smul, mul_assoc] at *
· rw [hur₂, smul_smul, h, mul_smul, hur₁]
· rw [hs₂u, ← mul_assoc, h, mul_assoc, hs₁u]
#align ore_localization.ore_eqv OreLocalization.oreEqv
end OreLocalization
/-- The Ore localization of a monoid and a submonoid fulfilling the Ore condition. -/
@[to_additive AddOreLocalization "The Ore localization of an additive monoid and a submonoid
fulfilling the Ore condition."]
def OreLocalization {R : Type*} [Monoid R] (S : Submonoid R) [OreSet S]
(X : Type*) [MulAction R X] :=
Quotient (OreLocalization.oreEqv S X)
#align ore_localization OreLocalization
namespace OreLocalization
section Monoid
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R}
variable (R S) [OreSet S]
@[inherit_doc OreLocalization]
scoped syntax:1075 term noWs atomic("[" term "⁻¹" noWs "]") : term
macro_rules | `($R[$S⁻¹]) => ``(OreLocalization $S $R)
attribute [local instance] oreEqv
variable {R S}
variable {X} [MulAction R X]
/-- The division in the Ore localization `X[S⁻¹]`, as a fraction of an element of `X` and `S`. -/
@[to_additive "The subtraction in the Ore localization,
as a difference of an element of `X` and `S`."]
def oreDiv (r : X) (s : S) : X[S⁻¹] :=
Quotient.mk' (r, s)
#align ore_localization.ore_div OreLocalization.oreDiv
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:70 " /ₒ " => oreDiv
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:65 " -ₒ " => _root_.AddOreLocalization.oreSub
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
protected theorem ind {β : X[S⁻¹] → Prop}
(c : ∀ (r : X) (s : S), β (r /ₒ s)) : ∀ q, β q := by
apply Quotient.ind
rintro ⟨r, s⟩
exact c r s
#align ore_localization.ind OreLocalization.ind
@[to_additive]
theorem oreDiv_eq_iff {r₁ r₂ : X} {s₁ s₂ : S} :
r₁ /ₒ s₁ = r₂ /ₒ s₂ ↔ ∃ (u : S) (v : R), u • r₂ = v • r₁ ∧ u * s₂ = v * s₁ :=
Quotient.eq''
#align ore_localization.ore_div_eq_iff OreLocalization.oreDiv_eq_iff
/-- A fraction `r /ₒ s` is equal to its expansion by an arbitrary factor `t` if `t * s ∈ S`. -/
@[to_additive "A difference `r -ₒ s` is equal to its expansion by an
arbitrary translation `t` if `t + s ∈ S`."]
protected theorem expand (r : X) (s : S) (t : R) (hst : t * (s : R) ∈ S) :
r /ₒ s = t • r /ₒ ⟨t * s, hst⟩ := by
apply Quotient.sound
exact ⟨s, s * t, by rw [mul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def], by rw [← mul_assoc]⟩
#align ore_localization.expand OreLocalization.expand
/-- A fraction is equal to its expansion by a factor from `S`. -/
@[to_additive "A difference is equal to its expansion by a summand from `S`."]
protected theorem expand' (r : X) (s s' : S) : r /ₒ s = s' • r /ₒ (s' * s) :=
OreLocalization.expand r s s' (by norm_cast; apply SetLike.coe_mem)
#align ore_localization.expand' OreLocalization.expand'
/-- Fractions which differ by a factor of the numerator can be proven equal if
those factors expand to equal elements of `R`. -/
@[to_additive "Differences whose minuends differ by a common summand can be proven equal if
those summands expand to equal elements of `R`."]
protected theorem eq_of_num_factor_eq {r r' r₁ r₂ : R} {s t : S} (h : t * r = t * r') :
r₁ * r * r₂ /ₒ s = r₁ * r' * r₂ /ₒ s := by
rcases oreCondition r₁ t with ⟨r₁', t', hr₁⟩
rw [OreLocalization.expand' _ s t', OreLocalization.expand' _ s t']
congr 1
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: use `assoc_rw`?
calc (t' : R) * (r₁ * r * r₂)
= t' * r₁ * r * r₂ := by simp [← mul_assoc]
_ = r₁' * t * r * r₂ := by rw [hr₁]
_ = r₁' * (t * r) * r₂ := by simp [← mul_assoc]
_ = r₁' * (t * r') * r₂ := by rw [h]
_ = r₁' * t * r' * r₂ := by simp [← mul_assoc]
_ = t' * r₁ * r' * r₂ := by rw [hr₁]
_ = t' * (r₁ * r' * r₂) := by simp [← mul_assoc]
#align ore_localization.eq_of_num_factor_eq OreLocalization.eq_of_num_factor_eq
/-- A function or predicate over `X` and `S` can be lifted to `X[S⁻¹]` if it is invariant
under expansion on the left. -/
@[to_additive "A function or predicate over `X` and `S` can be lifted to the localizaton if it is
invariant under expansion on the left."]
def liftExpand {C : Sort*} (P : X → S → C)
(hP : ∀ (r : X) (t : R) (s : S) (ht : t * s ∈ S), P r s = P (t • r) ⟨t * s, ht⟩) :
X[S⁻¹] → C :=
Quotient.lift (fun p : X × S => P p.1 p.2) fun (r₁, s₁) (r₂, s₂) ⟨u, v, hr₂, hs₂⟩ => by
dsimp at *
have s₁vS : v * s₁ ∈ S := by
rw [← hs₂, ← S.coe_mul]
exact SetLike.coe_mem (u * s₂)
replace hs₂ : u * s₂ = ⟨_, s₁vS⟩ := by ext; simp [hs₂]
rw [hP r₁ v s₁ s₁vS, hP r₂ u s₂ (by norm_cast; rwa [hs₂]), ← hr₂]
simp only [← hs₂]; rfl
#align ore_localization.lift_expand OreLocalization.liftExpand
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftExpand_of {C : Sort*} {P : X → S → C}
{hP : ∀ (r : X) (t : R) (s : S) (ht : t * s ∈ S), P r s = P (t • r) ⟨t * s, ht⟩} (r : X)
(s : S) : liftExpand P hP (r /ₒ s) = P r s :=
rfl
#align ore_localization.lift_expand_of OreLocalization.liftExpand_of
/-- A version of `liftExpand` used to simultaneously lift functions with two arguments
in `X[S⁻¹]`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `liftExpand` used to simultaneously lift functions with two arguments"]
def lift₂Expand {C : Sort*} (P : X → S → X → S → C)
(hP :
∀ (r₁ : X) (t₁ : R) (s₁ : S) (ht₁ : t₁ * s₁ ∈ S) (r₂ : X) (t₂ : R) (s₂ : S)
(ht₂ : t₂ * s₂ ∈ S),
P r₁ s₁ r₂ s₂ = P (t₁ • r₁) ⟨t₁ * s₁, ht₁⟩ (t₂ • r₂) ⟨t₂ * s₂, ht₂⟩) :
X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] → C :=
liftExpand
(fun r₁ s₁ => liftExpand (P r₁ s₁) fun r₂ t₂ s₂ ht₂ => by
have := hP r₁ 1 s₁ (by simp) r₂ t₂ s₂ ht₂
simp [this])
fun r₁ t₁ s₁ ht₁ => by
ext x; induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r₂ s₂
dsimp only
rw [liftExpand_of, liftExpand_of, hP r₁ t₁ s₁ ht₁ r₂ 1 s₂ (by simp)]; simp
#align ore_localization.lift₂_expand OreLocalization.lift₂Expand
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift₂Expand_of {C : Sort*} {P : X → S → X → S → C}
{hP :
∀ (r₁ : X) (t₁ : R) (s₁ : S) (ht₁ : t₁ * s₁ ∈ S) (r₂ : X) (t₂ : R) (s₂ : S)
(ht₂ : t₂ * s₂ ∈ S),
P r₁ s₁ r₂ s₂ = P (t₁ • r₁) ⟨t₁ * s₁, ht₁⟩ (t₂ • r₂) ⟨t₂ * s₂, ht₂⟩}
(r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : lift₂Expand P hP (r₁ /ₒ s₁) (r₂ /ₒ s₂) = P r₁ s₁ r₂ s₂ :=
rfl
#align ore_localization.lift₂_expand_of OreLocalization.lift₂Expand_of
@[to_additive]
private def smul' (r₁ : R) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] :=
oreNum r₁ s₂ • r₂ /ₒ (oreDenom r₁ s₂ * s₁)
@[to_additive]
private theorem smul'_char (r₁ : R) (r₂ : X) (s₁ s₂ : S) (u : S) (v : R) (huv : u * r₁ = v * s₂) :
OreLocalization.smul' r₁ s₁ r₂ s₂ = v • r₂ /ₒ (u * s₁) := by
-- Porting note: `assoc_rw` was not ported yet
simp only [smul']
have h₀ := ore_eq r₁ s₂; set v₀ := oreNum r₁ s₂; set u₀ := oreDenom r₁ s₂
rcases oreCondition (u₀ : R) u with ⟨r₃, s₃, h₃⟩
have :=
calc
r₃ * v * s₂ = r₃ * (u * r₁) := by rw [mul_assoc, ← huv]
_ = s₃ * (u₀ * r₁) := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, h₃]
_ = s₃ * v₀ * s₂ := by rw [mul_assoc, h₀]
rcases ore_right_cancel _ _ _ this with ⟨s₄, hs₄⟩
symm; rw [oreDiv_eq_iff]
use s₄ * s₃
use s₄ * r₃
simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul, Submonoid.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
constructor
· rw [smul_smul, mul_assoc (c := v₀), ← hs₄]
simp only [smul_smul, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_assoc (b := (u₀ : R)), mul_assoc (c := (u₀ : R)), h₃]
simp only [mul_assoc]
/-- The multiplication on the Ore localization of monoids. -/
@[to_additive]
private def smul'' (r : R) (s : S) : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
liftExpand (smul' r s) fun r₁ r₂ s' hs => by
rcases oreCondition r s' with ⟨r₁', s₁', h₁⟩
rw [smul'_char _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
rcases oreCondition r ⟨_, hs⟩ with ⟨r₂', s₂', h₂⟩
rw [smul'_char _ _ _ _ _ _ h₂]
rcases oreCondition (s₁' : R) (s₂') with ⟨r₃', s₃', h₃⟩
have : s₃' * r₁' * s' = (r₃' * r₂' * r₂) * s' := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← h₁, ← mul_assoc, h₃, mul_assoc, h₂]
simp [mul_assoc]
rcases ore_right_cancel _ _ _ this with ⟨s₄', h₄⟩
have : (s₄' * r₃') * (s₂' * s) ∈ S := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc r₃', ← h₃]
exact (s₄' * (s₃' * s₁' * s)).2
rw [OreLocalization.expand' _ _ (s₄' * s₃'), OreLocalization.expand _ (s₂' * s) _ this]
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, smul_smul, mul_assoc, h₄]
congr 1
ext; simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_assoc]
rw [mul_assoc (s₄' : R), h₃, ← mul_assoc]
/-- The scalar multiplication on the Ore localization of monoids. -/
@[to_additive "the vector addition on the Ore localization of additive monoids."]
protected def smul : R[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
liftExpand smul'' fun r₁ r₂ s hs => by
ext x
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with x s₂
show OreLocalization.smul' r₁ s x s₂ = OreLocalization.smul' (r₂ * r₁) ⟨_, hs⟩ x s₂
rcases oreCondition r₁ s₂ with ⟨r₁', s₁', h₁⟩
rw [smul'_char _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
rcases oreCondition (r₂ * r₁) s₂ with ⟨r₂', s₂', h₂⟩
rw [smul'_char _ _ _ _ _ _ h₂]
rcases oreCondition (s₂' * r₂) (s₁') with ⟨r₃', s₃', h₃⟩
have : s₃' * r₂' * s₂ = r₃' * r₁' * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← h₂, ← mul_assoc _ r₂, ← mul_assoc, h₃, mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc]
rcases ore_right_cancel _ _ _ this with ⟨s₄', h₄⟩
have : (s₄' * r₃') * (s₁' * s) ∈ S := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_assoc _ r₃', ← h₃, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
exact mul_mem (s₄' * s₃' * s₂').2 hs
rw [OreLocalization.expand' (r₂' • x) _ (s₄' * s₃'), OreLocalization.expand _ _ _ this]
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, smul_smul, mul_assoc, h₄]
congr 1
ext; simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_assoc]
rw [mul_assoc _ r₃', ← h₃, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]
#align ore_localization.mul OreLocalization.smul
@[to_additive]
instance : SMul R[S⁻¹] X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨OreLocalization.smul⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Mul R[S⁻¹] :=
⟨OreLocalization.smul⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem oreDiv_smul_oreDiv {r₁ : R} {r₂ : X} {s₁ s₂ : S} :
(r₁ /ₒ s₁) • (r₂ /ₒ s₂) = oreNum r₁ s₂ • r₂ /ₒ (oreDenom r₁ s₂ * s₁) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem oreDiv_mul_oreDiv {r₁ : R} {r₂ : R} {s₁ s₂ : S} :
(r₁ /ₒ s₁) * (r₂ /ₒ s₂) = oreNum r₁ s₂ * r₂ /ₒ (oreDenom r₁ s₂ * s₁) :=
rfl
#align ore_localization.ore_div_mul_ore_div OreLocalization.oreDiv_mul_oreDiv
/-- A characterization lemma for the scalar multiplication on the Ore localization,
allowing for a choice of Ore numerator and Ore denominator. -/
@[to_additive "A characterization lemma for the vector addition on the Ore localization,
allowing for a choice of Ore minuend and Ore subtrahend."]
theorem oreDiv_smul_char (r₁ : R) (r₂ : X) (s₁ s₂ : S) (r' : R) (s' : S) (huv : s' * r₁ = r' * s₂) :
(r₁ /ₒ s₁) • (r₂ /ₒ s₂) = r' • r₂ /ₒ (s' * s₁) :=
smul'_char r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ s' r' huv
/-- A characterization lemma for the multiplication on the Ore localization, allowing for a choice
of Ore numerator and Ore denominator. -/
@[to_additive "A characterization lemma for the addition on the Ore localization,
allowing for a choice of Ore minuend and Ore subtrahend."]
theorem oreDiv_mul_char (r₁ r₂ : R) (s₁ s₂ : S) (r' : R) (s' : S) (huv : s' * r₁ = r' * s₂) :
r₁ /ₒ s₁ * (r₂ /ₒ s₂) = r' * r₂ /ₒ (s' * s₁) :=
smul'_char r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ s' r' huv
#align ore_localization.ore_div_mul_char OreLocalization.oreDiv_mul_char
/-- Another characterization lemma for the scalar multiplication on the Ore localizaion delivering
Ore witnesses and conditions bundled in a sigma type. -/
@[to_additive "Another characterization lemma for the vector addition on the
Ore localizaion delivering Ore witnesses and conditions bundled in a sigma type."]
def oreDivSMulChar' (r₁ : R) (r₂ : X) (s₁ s₂ : S) :
Σ'r' : R, Σ's' : S, s' * r₁ = r' * s₂ ∧ (r₁ /ₒ s₁) • (r₂ /ₒ s₂) = r' • r₂ /ₒ (s' * s₁) :=
⟨oreNum r₁ s₂, oreDenom r₁ s₂, ore_eq r₁ s₂, oreDiv_smul_oreDiv⟩
/-- Another characterization lemma for the multiplication on the Ore localizaion delivering
Ore witnesses and conditions bundled in a sigma type. -/
@[to_additive "Another characterization lemma for the addition on the Ore localizaion delivering
Ore witnesses and conditions bundled in a sigma type."]
def oreDivMulChar' (r₁ r₂ : R) (s₁ s₂ : S) :
Σ'r' : R, Σ's' : S, s' * r₁ = r' * s₂ ∧ r₁ /ₒ s₁ * (r₂ /ₒ s₂) = r' * r₂ /ₒ (s' * s₁) :=
⟨oreNum r₁ s₂, oreDenom r₁ s₂, ore_eq r₁ s₂, oreDiv_mul_oreDiv⟩
#align ore_localization.ore_div_mul_char' OreLocalization.oreDivMulChar'
@[to_additive AddOreLocalization.instZeroAddOreLocalization]
instance : One R[S⁻¹] :=
⟨1 /ₒ 1⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem one_def : (1 : R[S⁻¹]) = 1 /ₒ 1 :=
rfl
#align ore_localization.one_def OreLocalization.one_def
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited R[S⁻¹] :=
⟨1⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem div_eq_one' {r : R} (hr : r ∈ S) : r /ₒ ⟨r, hr⟩ = 1 := by
rw [OreLocalization.one_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, 1, by simp, by simp⟩
#align ore_localization.div_eq_one' OreLocalization.div_eq_one'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem div_eq_one {s : S} : (s : R) /ₒ s = 1 :=
OreLocalization.div_eq_one' _
#align ore_localization.div_eq_one OreLocalization.div_eq_one
@[to_additive]
protected theorem one_smul (x : X[S⁻¹]) : (1 : R[S⁻¹]) • x = x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
simp [OreLocalization.one_def, oreDiv_smul_char 1 r 1 s 1 s (by simp)]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem one_mul (x : R[S⁻¹]) : 1 * x = x :=
OreLocalization.one_smul x
#align ore_localization.one_mul OreLocalization.one_mul
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_one (x : R[S⁻¹]) : x * 1 = x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
simp [OreLocalization.one_def, oreDiv_mul_char r (1 : R) s (1 : S) r 1 (by simp)]
#align ore_localization.mul_one OreLocalization.mul_one
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_smul (x y : R[S⁻¹]) (z : X[S⁻¹]) : (x * y) • z = x • y • z := by
-- Porting note: `assoc_rw` was not ported yet
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r₁ s₁
induction' y using OreLocalization.ind with r₂ s₂
induction' z using OreLocalization.ind with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivMulChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'
rcases oreDivSMulChar' r₂ r₃ s₂ s₃ with ⟨rb, sb, hb, hb'⟩; rw [hb']; clear hb'
rcases oreCondition ra sb with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
rw [oreDiv_smul_char (ra * r₂) r₃ (sa * s₁) s₃ (rc * rb) sc]; swap
· rw [← mul_assoc _ ra, hc, mul_assoc, hb, ← mul_assoc]
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_smul]
symm; apply oreDiv_smul_char
rw [Submonoid.coe_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc _ ra, ← ha, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_assoc (x y z : R[S⁻¹]) : x * y * z = x * (y * z) :=
OreLocalization.mul_smul x y z
#align ore_localization.mul_assoc OreLocalization.mul_assoc
@[to_additive]
instance : Monoid R[S⁻¹] where
one_mul := OreLocalization.one_mul
mul_one := OreLocalization.mul_one
mul_assoc := OreLocalization.mul_assoc
@[to_additive]
instance instMulActionOreLocalization : MulAction R[S⁻¹] X[S⁻¹] where
one_smul := OreLocalization.one_smul
mul_smul := OreLocalization.mul_smul
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_inv (s s' : S) : ((s : R) /ₒ s') * ((s' : R) /ₒ s) = 1 := by
simp [oreDiv_mul_char (s : R) s' s' s 1 1 (by simp)]
#align ore_localization.mul_inv OreLocalization.mul_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem one_div_smul {r : X} {s t : S} : ((1 : R) /ₒ t) • (r /ₒ s) = r /ₒ (s * t) := by
simp [oreDiv_smul_char 1 r t s 1 s (by simp)]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem one_div_mul {r : R} {s t : S} : (1 /ₒ t) * (r /ₒ s) = r /ₒ (s * t) := by
simp [oreDiv_mul_char 1 r t s 1 s (by simp)]
#align ore_localization.mul_one_div OreLocalization.one_div_mul
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem smul_cancel {r : X} {s t : S} : ((s : R) /ₒ t) • (r /ₒ s) = r /ₒ t := by
simp [oreDiv_smul_char s.1 r t s 1 1 (by simp)]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem mul_cancel {r : R} {s t : S} : ((s : R) /ₒ t) * (r /ₒ s) = r /ₒ t := by
simp [oreDiv_mul_char s.1 r t s 1 1 (by simp)]
#align ore_localization.mul_cancel OreLocalization.mul_cancel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem smul_cancel' {r₁ : R} {r₂ : X} {s t : S} :
((r₁ * s) /ₒ t) • (r₂ /ₒ s) = (r₁ • r₂) /ₒ t := by
simp [oreDiv_smul_char (r₁ * s) r₂ t s r₁ 1 (by simp)]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem mul_cancel' {r₁ r₂ : R} {s t : S} :
((r₁ * s) /ₒ t) * (r₂ /ₒ s) = (r₁ * r₂) /ₒ t := by
simp [oreDiv_mul_char (r₁ * s) r₂ t s r₁ 1 (by simp)]
#align ore_localization.mul_cancel' OreLocalization.mul_cancel'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/OreLocalization/Basic.lean | 443 | 444 | theorem smul_div_one {p : R} {r : X} {s : S} : (p /ₒ s) • (r /ₒ 1) = (p • r) /ₒ s := by |
simp [oreDiv_smul_char p r s 1 p 1 (by simp)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Lower Lebesgue integral for `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions
We define the lower Lebesgue integral of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function.
## Notation
We introduce the following notation for the lower Lebesgue integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`.
* `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with respect to a measure `μ`;
* `∫⁻ x, f x`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with respect to the canonical measure
`volume` on `α`;
* `∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` over a set `s` with respect
to a measure `μ`, defined as `∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`;
* `∫⁻ x in s, f x`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` over a set `s` with respect
to the canonical measure `volume`, defined as `∫⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`.
-/
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- The **lower Lebesgue integral** of a function `f` with respect to a measure `μ`. -/
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫⁻ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫⁻ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
/-- For any function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`, there exists a measurable function `g ≤ f` with the same
integral. -/
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
/-- `∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ` is defined as the supremum of integrals of simple functions
`φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞` such that `φ ≤ f`. This lemma says that it suffices to take
functions `φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0`. -/
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
/-- **Monotone convergence theorem** -- sometimes called **Beppo-Levi convergence**.
See `lintegral_iSup_directed` for a more general form. -/
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
/-- Monotone convergence theorem -- sometimes called Beppo-Levi convergence. Version with
ae_measurable functions. -/
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
/-- Monotone convergence theorem expressed with limits -/
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. This lemma states this fact in terms of `ε` and `δ`. -/
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
/-- The sum of the lower Lebesgue integrals of two functions is less than or equal to the integral
of their sum. The other inequality needs one of these functions to be (a.e.-)measurable. -/
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
/-- If `f g : α → ℝ≥0∞` are two functions and one of them is (a.e.) measurable, then the Lebesgue
integral of `f + g` equals the sum of integrals. This lemma assumes that `f` is integrable, see also
`MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right` and primed versions of these lemmas. -/
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right'
/-- If `f g : α → ℝ≥0∞` are two functions and one of them is (a.e.) measurable, then the Lebesgue
integral of `f + g` equals the sum of integrals. This lemma assumes that `g` is integrable, see also
`MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left` and primed versions of these lemmas. -/
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' f hg.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂c • μ = c * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul, ENNReal.mul_iSup, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_smul_measure
lemma set_lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂(c • μ) = c * ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_smul, lintegral_smul_measure]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [iSup_comm]
congr; funext s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.sum_insert hi, ← hs]
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup ?_).symm
intro φ ψ
exact
⟨⟨φ ⊔ ψ, fun x => sup_le (φ.2 x) (ψ.2 x)⟩,
add_le_add (SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_left le_rfl)
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_right le_rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_sum_measure
theorem hasSum_lintegral_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) :=
(lintegral_sum_measure f μ).symm ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align measure_theory.has_sum_lintegral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_lintegral_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ ν : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(μ + ν) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν := by
simpa [tsum_fintype] using lintegral_sum_measure f fun b => cond b μ ν
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Finset ι) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : ι → Measure α) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
rw [← Measure.sum_coe_finset, lintegral_sum_measure, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_of_isEmpty {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [IsEmpty α] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
have : Subsingleton (Measure α) := inferInstance
convert lintegral_zero_measure f
theorem set_lintegral_empty (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, lintegral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_empty MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_empty
theorem set_lintegral_univ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_univ MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_univ
theorem set_lintegral_measure_zero (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hs' : μ s = 0) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
convert lintegral_zero_measure _
exact Measure.restrict_eq_zero.2 hs'
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_measure_zero MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_measure_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum' (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f b) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih
· simp
· simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf
rw [lintegral_add_left' hf.1, ih hf.2]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum'
theorem lintegral_finset_sum (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b ∈ s, Measurable (f b)) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ :=
lintegral_finset_sum' s fun b hb => (hf b hb).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const_mul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (const α r * eapprox f n) a ∂μ := by
congr
funext a
rw [← iSup_eapprox_apply f hf, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
simp
_ = ⨆ n, r * (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
· intro n
exact SimpleFunc.measurable _
· intro i j h a
exact mul_le_mul_left' (monotone_eapprox _ h _) _
_ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by rw [← ENNReal.mul_iSup, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul
theorem lintegral_const_mul'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, r * hf.mk f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.ae_eq_mk _)
rw [A, B, lintegral_const_mul _ hf.measurable_mk]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul''
theorem lintegral_const_mul_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le fun s => ?_
rw [ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro hs
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_iSup_of_le (const α r * s) (le_iSup_of_le (fun x => ?_) le_rfl)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hs x) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul_le
theorem lintegral_const_mul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm _ (lintegral_const_mul_le r f)
have rinv : r * r⁻¹ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h hr
have rinv' : r⁻¹ * r = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact rinv
have := lintegral_const_mul_le (μ := μ) r⁻¹ fun x => r * f x
simp? [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv'] at this says
simp only [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv', one_mul] at this
simpa [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv] using mul_le_mul_left' this r
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul'
theorem lintegral_mul_const (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const
theorem lintegral_mul_const'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul'' r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const''
theorem lintegral_mul_const_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ := by
simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul_le r f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const_le
theorem lintegral_mul_const' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const'
/- A double integral of a product where each factor contains only one variable
is a product of integrals -/
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g ν) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x * g y ∂ν ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) * ∫⁻ y, g y ∂ν := by
simp [lintegral_const_mul'' _ hg, lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₁ {f f' : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h.mono fun a h => by dsimp only; rw [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₁ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₁
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₂ {f₁ f₁' : α → β} {f₂ f₂' : α → γ} (h₁ : f₁ =ᵐ[μ] f₁') (h₂ : f₂ =ᵐ[μ] f₂')
(g : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, g (f₁ a) (f₂ a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f₁' a) (f₂' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h₁.mp <| h₂.mono fun _ h₂ h₁ => by dsimp only; rw [h₁, h₂]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₂ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₂
theorem lintegral_indicator_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
apply iSup_le (fun g ↦ (iSup_le (fun hg ↦ ?_)))
have : g ≤ f := hg.trans (indicator_le_self s f)
refine le_iSup_of_le g (le_iSup_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_))
rw [lintegral_restrict, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
congr with t
by_cases H : t = 0
· simp [H]
congr with x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
rintro rfl
contrapose! H
simpa [H] using hg x
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm (lintegral_indicator_le f s)
simp only [lintegral, ← restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, iSup_subtype']
refine iSup_mono' (Subtype.forall.2 fun φ hφ => ?_)
refine ⟨⟨φ.restrict s, fun x => ?_⟩, le_rfl⟩
simp [hφ x, hs, indicator_le_indicator]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator
theorem lintegral_indicator₀ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq),
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
Measure.restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator₀
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ ≤ c * μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_le _ _).trans (set_lintegral_const s c).le
theorem lintegral_indicator_const₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_indicator₀ _ hs, set_lintegral_const]
theorem lintegral_indicator_const {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s :=
lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet c
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const
theorem set_lintegral_eq_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in { x | f x = r }, f x ∂μ = r * μ { x | f x = r } := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ { x | f x = r } → f x = r := ae_of_all μ fun _ hx => hx
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun _ this]
· rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton r)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_eq_const
theorem lintegral_indicator_one_le (s : Set α) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ ≤ μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const_le _ _).trans <| (one_mul _).le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs _).trans <| one_mul _
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const hs _).trans <| one_mul _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_one
/-- A version of **Markov's inequality** for two functions. It doesn't follow from the standard
Markov's inequality because we only assume measurability of `g`, not `f`. -/
theorem lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ f with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } = ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } := by
rw [hφ_eq]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } := by
gcongr
exact fun x => (add_le_add_right (hφ_le _) _).trans
_ = ∫⁻ x, φ x + indicator { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } (fun _ => ε) x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_add_left hφm, lintegral_indicator₀, set_lintegral_const]
exact measurableSet_le (hφm.nullMeasurable.measurable'.add_const _) hg.nullMeasurable
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := lintegral_mono_ae (hle.mono fun x hx₁ => ?_)
simp only [indicator_apply]; split_ifs with hx₂
exacts [hx₂, (add_zero _).trans_le <| (hφ_le x).trans hx₁]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral
/-- **Markov's inequality** also known as **Chebyshev's first inequality**. -/
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [lintegral_zero, zero_add] using
lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral (ae_of_all _ fun x => zero_le (f x)) hf ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀
/-- **Markov's inequality** also known as **Chebyshev's first inequality**. For a version assuming
`AEMeasurable`, see `mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀`. -/
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf.aemeasurable ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral
lemma meas_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 1 ≤ f x) : μ s ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_trans _ (mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf 1)
rw [one_mul]
exact measure_mono hs
lemma lintegral_le_meas {s : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≤ 1) (h'f : ∀ a ∈ sᶜ, f a = 0) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ μ s := by
apply (lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)).trans (lintegral_indicator_one_le s)
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [hx] using hf x
· simpa [hx] using h'f x hx
theorem lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hμf : μ {x | f x = ∞} ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
calc
∞ = ∞ * μ { x | ∞ ≤ f x } := by simp [mul_eq_top, hμf]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ∞
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf <|
mt (eq_bot_mono <| by rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep]; exact Measure.le_restrict_apply _ _) hμf
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hμf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
μ {x | f x = ∞} = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_set_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top
/-- **Markov's inequality** also known as **Chebyshev's first inequality**. -/
theorem meas_ge_le_lintegral_div {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0)
(hε' : ε ≠ ∞) : μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) / ε :=
(ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hε) (Or.inl hε')).2 <| by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ε
#align measure_theory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div MeasureTheory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hgf : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x < f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
intro n
simp only [ae_iff, not_lt]
have : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + (↑n)⁻¹ * μ { x : α | f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
(lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral hfg hg n⁻¹).trans hgf
rw [(ENNReal.cancel_of_ne hf).add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at this
exact this.resolve_left (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _))
refine hfg.mp ((ae_all_iff.2 this).mono fun x hlt hle => hle.antisymm ?_)
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) from
ge_of_tendsto' this fun i => (hlt i).le
simpa only [inv_top, add_zero] using
tendsto_const_nhds.add (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
have : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ ≠ ∞ := by simp [lintegral_zero, zero_ne_top]
⟨fun h =>
(ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le (ae_of_all _ <| zero_le f) this hf
(h.trans lintegral_zero.symm).le).symm,
fun h => (lintegral_congr_ae h).trans lintegral_zero⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff' MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff
theorem lintegral_pos_iff_support {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(0 < ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hf, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Function.support]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_pos_iff_support MeasureTheory.lintegral_pos_iff_support
theorem setLintegral_pos_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} :
0 < ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f ∩ s) := by
rw [lintegral_pos_iff_support hf, Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_support hf)]
/-- Weaker version of the monotone convergence theorem-/
theorem lintegral_iSup_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f n.succ a) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null (ae_iff.1 (ae_all_iff.2 h_mono))
let g n a := if a ∈ s then 0 else f n a
have g_eq_f : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, g n a = f n a :=
(measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 hs.2.2).mono fun a ha n => if_neg ha
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, g n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| g_eq_f.mono fun a ha => by simp only [ha]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, g n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => measurable_const.piecewise hs.2.1 (hf n))
(monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n a => ?_))
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by simp only [lintegral_congr_ae (g_eq_f.mono fun _a ha => ha _)]
simp only [g]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· have := Set.not_mem_subset hs.1 h
simp only [not_forall, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_exists, not_lt] at this
exact this n
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_ae
theorem lintegral_sub' {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq hg_fin ?_
rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hg]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (h_le.mono fun x hx => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hx)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub'
theorem lintegral_sub {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub' hg.aemeasurable hg_fin h_le
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub
theorem lintegral_sub_le' (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
by_cases hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞
· rw [hfi, add_top]
exact le_top
· rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hf]
gcongr
exact le_tsub_add
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le'
theorem lintegral_sub_le (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub_le' f g hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h : ∃ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ g x) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, Ne, Classical.not_not]
exact ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le h_le hfi hg h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) {s : Set α} (hμs : μ s ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt hg hfi h_le <|
((frequently_ae_mem_iff.2 hμs).and_eventually h).mono fun _x hx => (hx.2 hx.1).ne
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on
theorem lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
rw [Ne, ← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero] at hμ
refine lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on hg hfi (ae_le_of_ae_lt h) hμ ?_
simpa using h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono
theorem set_lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ 0) (hg : Measurable g) (hfi : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono (by simp [hs]) hg.aemeasurable hfi ((ae_restrict_iff' hsm).mpr h)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_strict_mono
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for nonincreasing sequences of functions -/
theorem lintegral_iInf_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ ≤ᵐ[μ] f n) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
have fn_le_f0 : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
have fn_le_f0' : ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ := iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
(ENNReal.sub_right_inj h_fin fn_le_f0 fn_le_f0').1 <|
show ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ from
calc
∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_sub (measurable_iInf h_meas)
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le _ _)
(ae_of_all _ fun a => iInf_le _ _)).symm
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ := congr rfl (funext fun a => ENNReal.sub_iInf)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup_ae (fun n => (h_meas 0).sub (h_meas n)) fun n =>
(h_mono n).mono fun a ha => tsub_le_tsub le_rfl ha)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
(have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ a ≤ f n a := ae_all_iff.2 h_mono
have h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f 0 a := fun n =>
h_mono.mono fun a h => by
induction' n with n ih
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_trans (h n) ih
congr_arg iSup <|
funext fun n =>
lintegral_sub (h_meas _) (ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono_ae <| h_mono n)
(h_mono n))
_ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := ENNReal.sub_iInf.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_ae
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for nonincreasing sequences of functions -/
theorem lintegral_iInf {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_anti : Antitone f)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iInf_ae h_meas (fun n => ae_of_all _ <| h_anti n.le_succ) h_fin
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf
theorem lintegral_iInf' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_anti : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a)) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iInf_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Antitone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_anti
have h_ae_seq_mono : Antitone (aeSeq h_meas p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet h_meas p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet h_meas hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iInf h_meas hp).symm]
simp_rw [iInf_apply]
rw [lintegral_iInf (aeSeq.measurable h_meas p) h_ae_seq_mono]
· congr
exact funext fun n ↦ lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp n)
· rwa [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp 0)]
/-- Monotone convergence for an infimum over a directed family and indexed by a countable type -/
theorem lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [Countable β]
{f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure α} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b))
(hf_int : ∀ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_directed : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp only [iInf_of_empty, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.top_mul (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.mpr hμ)]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨅ b, f b a = ⨅ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
refine fun a =>
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun n => iInf_le _ _)
(le_iInf fun b => iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) ?_)
exact h_directed.sequence_le b a
-- Porting note: used `∘` below to deal with its reduced reducibility
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by simp only [this, Function.comp_apply]
_ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_iInf ?_ h_directed.sequence_anti]
· exact hf_int _
· exact fun n => hf _
_ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun b => ?_) (le_iInf fun n => ?_)
· exact iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.sequence_le b)
· exact iInf_le (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
#align lintegral_infi_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable
/-- Known as Fatou's lemma, version with `AEMeasurable` functions -/
theorem lintegral_liminf_le' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
calc
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat]
_ = ⨆ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup' (fun n => aemeasurable_biInf _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ h_meas i))
(ae_of_all μ fun a n m hnm => iInf_le_iInf_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi))
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := iSup_mono fun n => le_iInf₂_lintegral _
_ = atTop.liminf fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le'
/-- Known as Fatou's lemma -/
theorem lintegral_liminf_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
lintegral_liminf_le' fun n => (h_meas n).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le
theorem limsup_lintegral_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_bound : ∀ n, f n ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ :=
calc
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
_ ≤ ⨅ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := iInf_mono fun n => iSup₂_lintegral_le _
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
refine (lintegral_iInf ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro n
exact measurable_biSup _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ hf_meas i)
· intro n m hnm a
exact iSup_le_iSup_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi
· refine ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin (lintegral_mono_ae ?_)
refine (ae_all_iff.2 h_bound).mono fun n hn => ?_
exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => hn i
_ = ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ := by simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat]
#align measure_theory.limsup_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.limsup_lintegral_le
/-- Dominated convergence theorem for nonnegative functions -/
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) :=
tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
(calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n : ℕ => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.liminf_eq.symm
_ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop := lintegral_liminf_le hF_meas
)
(calc
limsup (fun n : ℕ => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
limsup_lintegral_le hF_meas h_bound h_fin
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.limsup_eq
)
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence
/-- Dominated convergence theorem for nonnegative functions which are just almost everywhere
measurable. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 1,167 | 1,183 | theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) := by |
have : ∀ n, ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a ∂μ := fun n =>
lintegral_congr_ae (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk
simp_rw [this]
apply
tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence bound (fun n => (hF_meas n).measurable_mk) _ h_fin
· have : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := fun n => (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk.symm
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := ae_all_iff.mpr this
filter_upwards [this, h_lim] with a H H'
simp_rw [H]
exact H'
· intro n
filter_upwards [h_bound n, (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk] with a H H'
rwa [H'] at H
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Free
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.CofilteredLimit
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Product
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Algebra
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Bool.Lemmas
/-!
# Nöbeling's theorem
This file proves Nöbeling's theorem.
## Main result
* `LocallyConstant.freeOfProfinite`: Nöbeling's theorem.
For `S : Profinite`, the `ℤ`-module `LocallyConstant S ℤ` is free.
## Proof idea
We follow the proof of theorem 5.4 in [scholze2019condensed], in which the idea is to embed `S` in
a product of `I` copies of `Bool` for some sufficiently large `I`, and then to choose a
well-ordering on `I` and use ordinal induction over that well-order. Here we can let `I` be
the set of clopen subsets of `S` since `S` is totally separated.
The above means it suffices to prove the following statement: For a closed subset `C` of `I → Bool`,
the `ℤ`-module `LocallyConstant C ℤ` is free.
For `i : I`, let `e C i : LocallyConstant C ℤ` denote the map `fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)`.
The basis will consist of products `e C iᵣ * ⋯ * e C i₁` with `iᵣ > ⋯ > i₁` which cannot be written
as linear combinations of lexicographically smaller products. We call this set `GoodProducts C`
What is proved by ordinal induction is that this set is linearly independent. The fact that it
spans can be proved directly.
## References
- [scholze2019condensed], Theorem 5.4.
-/
universe u
namespace Profinite
namespace NobelingProof
variable {I : Type u} [LinearOrder I] [IsWellOrder I (·<·)] (C : Set (I → Bool))
open Profinite ContinuousMap CategoryTheory Limits Opposite Submodule
section Projections
/-!
## Projection maps
The purpose of this section is twofold.
Firstly, in the proof that the set `GoodProducts C` spans the whole module `LocallyConstant C ℤ`,
we need to project `C` down to finite discrete subsets and write `C` as a cofiltered limit of those.
Secondly, in the inductive argument, we need to project `C` down to "smaller" sets satisfying the
inductive hypothesis.
In this section we define the relevant projection maps and prove some compatibility results.
### Main definitions
* Let `J : I → Prop`. Then `Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)` is the projection mapping everything
that satisfies `J i` to itself, and everything else to `false`.
* The image of `C` under `Proj J` is denoted `π C J` and the corresponding map `C → π C J` is called
`ProjRestrict`. If `J` implies `K` we have a map `ProjRestricts : π C K → π C J`.
* `spanCone_isLimit` establishes that when `C` is compact, it can be written as a limit of its
images under the maps `Proj (· ∈ s)` where `s : Finset I`.
-/
variable (J K L : I → Prop) [∀ i, Decidable (J i)] [∀ i, Decidable (K i)] [∀ i, Decidable (L i)]
/--
The projection mapping everything that satisfies `J i` to itself, and everything else to `false`
-/
def Proj : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool) :=
fun c i ↦ if J i then c i else false
@[simp]
theorem continuous_proj :
Continuous (Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)) := by
dsimp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Proj]
apply continuous_pi
intro i
split
· apply continuous_apply
· apply continuous_const
/-- The image of `Proj π J` -/
def π : Set (I → Bool) := (Proj J) '' C
/-- The restriction of `Proj π J` to a subset, mapping to its image. -/
@[simps!]
def ProjRestrict : C → π C J :=
Set.MapsTo.restrict (Proj J) _ _ (Set.mapsTo_image _ _)
@[simp]
theorem continuous_projRestrict : Continuous (ProjRestrict C J) :=
Continuous.restrict _ (continuous_proj _)
theorem proj_eq_self {x : I → Bool} (h : ∀ i, x i ≠ false → J i) : Proj J x = x := by
ext i
simp only [Proj, ite_eq_left_iff]
contrapose!
simpa only [ne_comm] using h i
theorem proj_prop_eq_self (hh : ∀ i x, x ∈ C → x i ≠ false → J i) : π C J = C := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun ⟨y, hy, h⟩ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨x, h, ?_⟩⟩
· rwa [← h, proj_eq_self]; exact (hh · y hy)
· rw [proj_eq_self]; exact (hh · x h)
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 125 | 127 | theorem proj_comp_of_subset (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : (Proj J ∘ Proj K) =
(Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)) := by |
ext x i; dsimp [Proj]; aesop
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Units
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.IntUnitsPower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DirectSum.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Algebra
/-!
# Graded tensor products over graded algebras
The graded tensor product $A \hat\otimes_R B$ is imbued with a multiplication defined on homogeneous
tensors by:
$$(a \otimes b) \cdot (a' \otimes b') = (-1)^{\deg a' \deg b} (a \cdot a') \otimes (b \cdot b')$$
where $A$ and $B$ are algebras graded by `ℕ`, `ℤ`, or `ZMod 2` (or more generally, any index
that satisfies `Module ι (Additive ℤˣ)`).
The results for internally-graded algebras (via `GradedAlgebra`) are elsewhere, as is the type
`GradedTensorProduct`.
## Main results
* `TensorProduct.gradedComm`: the symmetric braiding operator on the tensor product of
externally-graded rings.
* `TensorProduct.gradedMul`: the previously-described multiplication on externally-graded rings, as
a bilinear map.
## Implementation notes
Rather than implementing the multiplication directly as above, we first implement the canonical
non-trivial braiding sending $a \otimes b$ to $(-1)^{\deg a' \deg b} (b \otimes a)$, as the
multiplication follows trivially from this after some point-free nonsense.
## References
* https://math.stackexchange.com/q/202718/1896
* [*Algebra I*, Bourbaki : Chapter III, §4.7, example (2)][bourbaki1989]
-/
suppress_compilation
open scoped TensorProduct DirectSum
variable {R ι A B : Type*}
namespace TensorProduct
variable [CommSemiring ι] [Module ι (Additive ℤˣ)] [DecidableEq ι]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Type*) (ℬ : ι → Type*)
variable [CommRing R]
variable [∀ i, AddCommGroup (𝒜 i)] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (ℬ i)]
variable [∀ i, Module R (𝒜 i)] [∀ i, Module R (ℬ i)]
variable [DirectSum.GRing 𝒜] [DirectSum.GRing ℬ]
variable [DirectSum.GAlgebra R 𝒜] [DirectSum.GAlgebra R ℬ]
-- this helps with performance
instance (i : ι × ι) : Module R (𝒜 (Prod.fst i) ⊗[R] ℬ (Prod.snd i)) :=
TensorProduct.leftModule
open DirectSum (lof)
variable (R)
section gradedComm
local notation "𝒜ℬ" => (fun i : ι × ι => 𝒜 (Prod.fst i) ⊗[R] ℬ (Prod.snd i))
local notation "ℬ𝒜" => (fun i : ι × ι => ℬ (Prod.fst i) ⊗[R] 𝒜 (Prod.snd i))
/-- Auxliary construction used to build `TensorProduct.gradedComm`.
This operates on direct sums of tensors instead of tensors of direct sums. -/
def gradedCommAux : DirectSum _ 𝒜ℬ →ₗ[R] DirectSum _ ℬ𝒜 := by
refine DirectSum.toModule R _ _ fun i => ?_
have o := DirectSum.lof R _ ℬ𝒜 i.swap
have s : ℤˣ := ((-1 : ℤˣ)^(i.1* i.2 : ι) : ℤˣ)
exact (s • o) ∘ₗ (TensorProduct.comm R _ _).toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem gradedCommAux_lof_tmul (i j : ι) (a : 𝒜 i) (b : ℬ j) :
gradedCommAux R 𝒜 ℬ (lof R _ 𝒜ℬ (i, j) (a ⊗ₜ b)) =
(-1 : ℤˣ)^(j * i) • lof R _ ℬ𝒜 (j, i) (b ⊗ₜ a) := by
rw [gradedCommAux]
dsimp
simp [mul_comm i j]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Graded/External.lean | 93 | 98 | theorem gradedCommAux_comp_gradedCommAux :
gradedCommAux R 𝒜 ℬ ∘ₗ gradedCommAux R ℬ 𝒜 = LinearMap.id := by |
ext i a b
dsimp
rw [gradedCommAux_lof_tmul, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, gradedCommAux_lof_tmul, smul_smul,
mul_comm i.2 i.1, Int.units_mul_self, one_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.seq.computation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
/-!
# Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
This file provides a `Computation` type where `Computation α` is the type of
unbounded computations returning `α`.
-/
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive Computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| pure : α → Computation α
| think : Computation α → Computation α
-/
/-- `Computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `Computation α` is an infinite sequence of `Option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def Computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // ∀ ⦃n a⦄, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a }
#align computation Computation
namespace Computation
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `pure a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
-- Porting note: `return` is reserved, so changed to `pure`
def pure (a : α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const (some a), fun _ _ => id⟩
#align computation.return Computation.pure
instance : CoeTC α (Computation α) :=
⟨pure⟩
-- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.cons none c.1, fun n a h => by
cases' n with n
· contradiction
· exact c.2 h⟩
#align computation.think Computation.think
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : Computation α) : ℕ → Computation α
| 0 => c
| n + 1 => think (thinkN c n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.thinkN Computation.thinkN
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = pure a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : Computation α) : Option α :=
c.1.head
#align computation.head Computation.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = pure a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, fun _ _ h => c.2 h⟩
#align computation.tail Computation.tail
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun _ _ => id⟩
#align computation.empty Computation.empty
instance : Inhabited (Computation α) :=
⟨empty _⟩
/-- `runFor c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def runFor : Computation α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
#align computation.run_for Computation.runFor
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = pure a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : Computation α) : Sum α (Computation α) :=
match c.1 0 with
| none => Sum.inr (tail c)
| some a => Sum.inl a
#align computation.destruct Computation.destruct
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
unsafe def run : Computation α → α
| c =>
match destruct c with
| Sum.inl a => a
| Sum.inr ca => run ca
#align computation.run Computation.run
theorem destruct_eq_pure {s : Computation α} {a : α} : destruct s = Sum.inl a → s = pure a := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with _ <;> intro h
· contradiction
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
· injection h with h'
rwa [h'] at f0
· exact s.2 IH
#align computation.destruct_eq_ret Computation.destruct_eq_pure
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : Computation α} {s'} : destruct s = Sum.inr s' → s = think s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with a' <;> intro h
· injection h with h'
rw [← h']
cases' s with f al
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [think, tail]
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
· contradiction
#align computation.destruct_eq_think Computation.destruct_eq_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_pure (a : α) : destruct (pure a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
#align computation.destruct_ret Computation.destruct_pure
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : Computation α, destruct (think s) = Sum.inr s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align computation.destruct_think Computation.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = Sum.inr (empty α) :=
rfl
#align computation.destruct_empty Computation.destruct_empty
@[simp]
theorem head_pure (a : α) : head (pure a) = some a :=
rfl
#align computation.head_ret Computation.head_pure
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : Computation α) : head (think s) = none :=
rfl
#align computation.head_think Computation.head_think
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none :=
rfl
#align computation.head_empty Computation.head_empty
@[simp]
theorem tail_pure (a : α) : tail (pure a) = pure a :=
rfl
#align computation.tail_ret Computation.tail_pure
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : Computation α) : tail (think s) = s := by
cases' s with f al; apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]
#align computation.tail_think Computation.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α :=
rfl
#align computation.tail_empty Computation.tail_empty
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
#align computation.think_empty Computation.think_empty
/-- Recursion principle for computations, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} (s : Computation α) (h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
match H : destruct s with
| Sum.inl v => by
rw [destruct_eq_pure H]
apply h1
| Sum.inr v => match v with
| ⟨a, s'⟩ => by
rw [destruct_eq_think H]
apply h2
#align computation.rec_on Computation.recOn
/-- Corecursor constructor for `corec`-/
def Corec.f (f : β → Sum α β) : Sum α β → Option α × Sum α β
| Sum.inl a => (some a, Sum.inl a)
| Sum.inr b =>
(match f b with
| Sum.inl a => some a
| Sum.inr _ => none,
f b)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.corec.F Computation.Corec.f
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = pure a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → Sum α β) (b : β) : Computation α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b), fun n a' h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (Sum.inr b)).2 n = some a'
revert h; generalize Sum.inr b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = some a' → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = some a'
cases' o with _ b <;> intro h
· exact h
unfold Corec.f at *; split <;> simp_all
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
#align computation.corec Computation.corec
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : Sum α γ → Sum β γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl (f a)
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr b
#align computation.lmap Computation.lmap
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : Sum α β → Sum α γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr (f b)
#align computation.rmap Computation.rmap
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
-- Porting note: this was far less painful in mathlib3. There seem to be two issues;
-- firstly, in mathlib3 we have `corec.F._match_1` and it's the obvious map α ⊕ β → option α.
-- In mathlib4 we have `Corec.f.match_1` and it's something completely different.
-- Secondly, the proof that `Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0` is this function
-- evaluated at `f b`, used to be `rfl` and now is `cases, rfl`.
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → Sum α β) (b : β) : destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0 =
Sum.rec Option.some (fun _ ↦ none) (f b) by
dsimp [Corec.f, Stream'.corec', Stream'.corec, Stream'.map, Stream'.get, Stream'.iterate]
match (f b) with
| Sum.inl x => rfl
| Sum.inr x => rfl
]
induction' h : f b with a b'; · rfl
dsimp [Corec.f, destruct]
apply congr_arg; apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
#align computation.corec_eq Computation.corec_eq
section Bisim
variable (R : Computation α → Computation α → Prop)
/-- bisimilarity relation-/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity over a sum of `Computation`s-/
def BisimO : Sum α (Computation α) → Sum α (Computation α) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl a' => a = a'
| Sum.inr s, Sum.inr s' => R s s'
| _, _ => False
#align computation.bisim_o Computation.BisimO
attribute [simp] BisimO
/-- Attribute expressing bisimilarity over two `Computation`s-/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
#align computation.is_bisimulation Computation.IsBisimulation
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ =>
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have h := bisim r; revert r h
apply recOn s _ _ <;> intro r' <;> apply recOn s' _ _ <;> intro a' r h
· constructor <;> dsimp at h
· rw [h]
· rw [h] at r
rw [tail_pure, tail_pure,h]
assumption
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· simp_all
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
#align computation.eq_of_bisim Computation.eq_of_bisim
end Bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
/-- Assertion that a `Computation` limits to a given value-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : Computation α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
#align computation.mem Computation.Mem
instance : Membership α (Computation α) :=
⟨Computation.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a := by
cases' s with f al
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
#align computation.le_stable Computation.le_stable
theorem mem_unique {s : Computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩, ⟨n, hb⟩ => by
injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans (le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
#align computation.mem_unique Computation.mem_unique
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Computation α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
#align computation.mem.left_unique Computation.Mem.left_unique
/-- `Terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class Terminates (s : Computation α) : Prop where
/-- assertion that there is some term `a` such that the `Computation` terminates -/
term : ∃ a, a ∈ s
#align computation.terminates Computation.Terminates
theorem terminates_iff (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h.1, Terminates.mk⟩
#align computation.terminates_iff Computation.terminates_iff
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
#align computation.terminates_of_mem Computation.terminates_of_mem
theorem terminates_def (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).isSome :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ =>
⟨n, by
dsimp [Stream'.get] at h
rw [← h]
exact rfl⟩,
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨⟨Option.get _ h, n, (Option.eq_some_of_isSome h).symm⟩⟩⟩
#align computation.terminates_def Computation.terminates_def
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
#align computation.ret_mem Computation.ret_mem
theorem eq_of_pure_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ pure a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
#align computation.eq_of_ret_mem Computation.eq_of_pure_mem
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : Terminates (pure a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
#align computation.ret_terminates Computation.ret_terminates
theorem think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨n + 1, h⟩
#align computation.think_mem Computation.think_mem
instance think_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s], Terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, n + 1, h⟩⟩
#align computation.think_terminates Computation.think_terminates
theorem of_think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => by
cases' n with n'
· contradiction
· exact ⟨n', h⟩
#align computation.of_think_mem Computation.of_think_mem
theorem of_think_terminates {s : Computation α} : Terminates (think s) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
#align computation.of_think_terminates Computation.of_think_terminates
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α := fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by contradiction
#align computation.not_mem_empty Computation.not_mem_empty
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬Terminates (empty α) := fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => not_mem_empty a h
#align computation.not_terminates_empty Computation.not_terminates_empty
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬Terminates s) : s = empty α := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
induction' h : s.val n with _; · rfl
refine absurd ?_ H; exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
#align computation.eq_empty_of_not_terminates Computation.eq_empty_of_not_terminates
theorem thinkN_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| n + 1 => Iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.thinkN_mem Computation.thinkN_mem
instance thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s] (n), Terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, n => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.thinkN_terminates Computation.thinkN_terminates
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) (n) : Terminates (thinkN s n) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.of_thinkN_terminates Computation.of_thinkN_terminates
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def Promises (s : Computation α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
#align computation.promises Computation.Promises
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~> " => Promises
theorem mem_promises {s : Computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a := fun h _ => mem_unique h
#align computation.mem_promises Computation.mem_promises
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a := fun _ h => absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
#align computation.empty_promises Computation.empty_promises
section get
variable (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s]
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ :=
Nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
#align computation.length Computation.length
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α :=
Option.get _ (Nat.find_spec <| (terminates_def _).1 h)
#align computation.get Computation.get
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
Exists.intro (length s) (Option.eq_some_of_isSome _).symm
#align computation.get_mem Computation.get_mem
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
#align computation.get_eq_of_mem Computation.get_eq_of_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Computation.lean | 460 | 460 | theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s := by | intro h; rw [← h]; apply get_mem
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
/-!
# Theory of degrees of polynomials
Some of the main results include
- `natDegree_comp_le` : The degree of the composition is at most the product of degrees
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {ι : Type w} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Degree
theorem natDegree_comp_le : natDegree (p.comp q) ≤ natDegree p * natDegree q :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : p.comp q = 0 then by rw [h0, natDegree_zero]; exact Nat.zero_le _
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
↑(natDegree (p.comp q)) = degree (p.comp q) := (degree_eq_natDegree h0).symm
_ = _ := congr_arg degree comp_eq_sum_left
_ ≤ _ := degree_sum_le _ _
_ ≤ _ :=
Finset.sup_le fun n hn =>
calc
degree (C (coeff p n) * q ^ n) ≤ degree (C (coeff p n)) + degree (q ^ n) :=
degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • degree q :=
(add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_pow_le _ _))
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • ↑(natDegree q) :=
(add_le_add_left (nsmul_le_nsmul_right (@degree_le_natDegree _ _ q) n) _)
_ = (n * natDegree q : ℕ) := by
rw [natDegree_C, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, nsmul_eq_mul];
simp
_ ≤ (natDegree p * natDegree q : ℕ) :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <|
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mem_support_iff.1 hn))
(Nat.zero_le _)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_comp_le Polynomial.natDegree_comp_le
theorem degree_pos_of_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (h : IsRoot p a) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have := eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hlt
rw [IsRoot, this, eval_C] at h
simp only [h, RingHom.map_zero] at this
exact hp this
#align polynomial.degree_pos_of_root Polynomial.degree_pos_of_root
theorem natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero : p.natDegree ≤ n ↔ ∀ N : ℕ, n < N → p.coeff N = 0 := by
simp_rw [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero Polynomial.natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_left {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ p.natDegree ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le h qn⟩
refine natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mpr fun m hm => ?_
convert natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp h m hm using 1
rw [coeff_add, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp qn _ hm, add_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_le_iff_left Polynomial.natDegree_add_le_iff_left
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_right {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ q.natDegree ≤ n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact natDegree_add_le_iff_left _ _ pn
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_le_iff_right Polynomial.natDegree_add_le_iff_right
theorem natDegree_C_mul_le (a : R) (f : R[X]) : (C a * f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree :=
calc
(C a * f).natDegree ≤ (C a).natDegree + f.natDegree := natDegree_mul_le
_ = 0 + f.natDegree := by rw [natDegree_C a]
_ = f.natDegree := zero_add _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_le Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_le
theorem natDegree_mul_C_le (f : R[X]) (a : R) : (f * C a).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree :=
calc
(f * C a).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree + (C a).natDegree := natDegree_mul_le
_ = f.natDegree + 0 := by rw [natDegree_C a]
_ = f.natDegree := add_zero _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul_C_le Polynomial.natDegree_mul_C_le
theorem eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (ns : n ∈ p.support) :
p.natDegree = n :=
le_antisymm pn (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ ns)
#align polynomial.eq_nat_degree_of_le_mem_support Polynomial.eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support
theorem natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_eq_one {ai : R} (au : ai * a = 1) :
(C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
le_antisymm (natDegree_C_mul_le a p)
(calc
p.natDegree = (1 * p).natDegree := by nth_rw 1 [← one_mul p]
_ = (C ai * (C a * p)).natDegree := by rw [← C_1, ← au, RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc]
_ ≤ (C a * p).natDegree := natDegree_C_mul_le ai (C a * p))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_eq_one Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_eq_one
theorem natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one {ai : R} (au : a * ai = 1) :
(p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
le_antisymm (natDegree_mul_C_le p a)
(calc
p.natDegree = (p * 1).natDegree := by nth_rw 1 [← mul_one p]
_ = (p * C a * C ai).natDegree := by rw [← C_1, ← au, RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc]
_ ≤ (p * C a).natDegree := natDegree_mul_C_le (p * C a) ai)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one Polynomial.natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one
/-- Although not explicitly stated, the assumptions of lemma `nat_degree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero`
force the polynomial `p` to be non-zero, via `p.leading_coeff ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : p.leadingCoeff * a ≠ 0) :
(p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
refine eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (natDegree_mul_C_le p a) ?_
refine mem_support_iff.mpr ?_
rwa [coeff_mul_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero
/-- Although not explicitly stated, the assumptions of lemma `nat_degree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero`
force the polynomial `p` to be non-zero, via `p.leading_coeff ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : a * p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
refine eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (natDegree_C_mul_le a p) ?_
refine mem_support_iff.mpr ?_
rwa [coeff_C_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero
theorem natDegree_add_coeff_mul (f g : R[X]) :
(f * g).coeff (f.natDegree + g.natDegree) = f.coeff f.natDegree * g.coeff g.natDegree := by
simp only [coeff_natDegree, coeff_mul_degree_add_degree]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_coeff_mul Polynomial.natDegree_add_coeff_mul
theorem natDegree_lt_coeff_mul (h : p.natDegree + q.natDegree < m + n) :
(p * q).coeff (m + n) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (natDegree_mul_le.trans_lt h)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_coeff_mul Polynomial.natDegree_lt_coeff_mul
theorem coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le (pm : p.natDegree ≤ m) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p * q).coeff (m + n) = p.coeff m * q.coeff n := by
simp_rw [← Polynomial.toFinsupp_apply, toFinsupp_mul]
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.apply_add_of_supDegree_le ?_ Function.injective_id ?_ ?_
· simp
· rwa [supDegree_eq_natDegree, id_eq]
· rwa [supDegree_eq_natDegree, id_eq]
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_of_nat_degree_le Polynomial.coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le
theorem coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p ^ m).coeff (m * n) = p.coeff n ^ m := by
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ← hm, Nat.succ_mul, coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le _ pn]
refine natDegree_pow_le.trans (le_trans ?_ (le_refl _))
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left pn m.zero_le
#align polynomial.coeff_pow_of_nat_degree_le Polynomial.coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le
theorem coeff_pow_eq_ite_of_natDegree_le_of_le {o : ℕ}
(pn : natDegree p ≤ n) (mno : m * n ≤ o) :
coeff (p ^ m) o = if o = m * n then (coeff p n) ^ m else 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne o (m * n) with rfl | h
· simpa only [ite_true] using coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le pn
· simpa only [h, ite_false] using coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <|
lt_of_le_of_lt (natDegree_pow_le_of_le m pn) (lt_of_le_of_ne mno h.symm)
theorem coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt (qn : q.natDegree < n) : (p + q).coeff n = p.coeff n :=
(coeff_add _ _ _).trans <|
(congr_arg _ <| coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| qn).trans <| add_zero _
#align polynomial.coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt Polynomial.coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt
theorem coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt (pn : p.natDegree < n) : (p + q).coeff n = q.coeff n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt pn
#align polynomial.coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt Polynomial.coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt
theorem degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint (f : S → R[X]) (s : Finset S)
(h : Set.Pairwise { i | i ∈ s ∧ f i ≠ 0 } (Ne on degree ∘ f)) :
degree (s.sum f) = s.sup fun i => degree (f i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with x s hx IH
· simp
· simp only [hx, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff, Finset.sup_insert]
specialize IH (h.mono fun _ => by simp (config := { contextual := true }))
rcases lt_trichotomy (degree (f x)) (degree (s.sum f)) with (H | H | H)
· rw [← IH, sup_eq_right.mpr H.le, degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt H]
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs)
· simp
obtain ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ := Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs fun i => degree (f i)
rw [IH, hy'] at H
by_cases hx0 : f x = 0
· simp [hx0, IH]
have hy0 : f y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! H
simpa [H, degree_eq_bot] using hx0
refine absurd H (h ?_ ?_ fun H => hx ?_)
· simp [hx0]
· simp [hy, hy0]
· exact H.symm ▸ hy
· rw [← IH, sup_eq_left.mpr H.le, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt H]
#align polynomial.degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint Polynomial.degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint
theorem natDegree_sum_eq_of_disjoint (f : S → R[X]) (s : Finset S)
(h : Set.Pairwise { i | i ∈ s ∧ f i ≠ 0 } (Ne on natDegree ∘ f)) :
natDegree (s.sum f) = s.sup fun i => natDegree (f i) := by
by_cases H : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0
· obtain ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ := H
have hs : s.Nonempty := ⟨x, hx⟩
refine natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some ?_
rw [degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint]
· rw [← Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs, ← Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs,
Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.coe_sup' hs, ←
Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [Finset.sup'_le_iff]
intro b hb
by_cases hb' : f b = 0
· simpa [hb'] using hs
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hb', Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup' (fun i : S => (natDegree (f i) : WithBot ℕ)) hb
· rw [Finset.sup'_le_iff]
intro b hb
simp only [Finset.le_sup'_iff, exists_prop, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hb' : f b = 0
· refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx'
simpa [← Nat.cast_withBot, hb', degree_eq_bot] using hx'
exact ⟨b, hb, (degree_eq_natDegree hb').ge⟩
· exact h.imp fun x y hxy hxy' => hxy (natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq hxy')
· push_neg at H
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero H, natDegree_zero, eq_comm, show 0 = ⊥ from rfl, Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
simp [H x hx]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint Polynomial.natDegree_sum_eq_of_disjoint
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem natDegree_bit0 (a : R[X]) : (bit0 a).natDegree ≤ a.natDegree :=
(natDegree_add_le _ _).trans (max_self _).le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_bit0 Polynomial.natDegree_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem natDegree_bit1 (a : R[X]) : (bit1 a).natDegree ≤ a.natDegree :=
(natDegree_add_le _ _).trans (by simp [natDegree_bit0])
#align polynomial.nat_degree_bit1 Polynomial.natDegree_bit1
variable [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R →+* S) {z : S}
(hz : eval₂ f z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, f x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < natDegree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have A : p = C (p.coeff 0) := eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero hlt
rw [A, eval₂_C] at hz
simp only [inj (p.coeff 0) hz, RingHom.map_zero] at A
exact hp A
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pos_of_eval₂_root Polynomial.natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root
theorem degree_pos_of_eval₂_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R →+* S) {z : S}
(hz : eval₂ f z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, f x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < degree p :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root hp f hz inj)
#align polynomial.degree_pos_of_eval₂_root Polynomial.degree_pos_of_eval₂_root
@[simp]
theorem coe_lt_degree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (n : WithBot ℕ) < degree p ↔ n < natDegree p := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp [h]
simp [degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.coe_lt_degree Polynomial.coe_lt_degree
@[simp]
theorem degree_map_eq_iff {f : R →+* S} {p : Polynomial R} :
degree (map f p) = degree p ↔ f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0 ∨ p = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with h|h
· simp [h]
simp only [h, or_false]
refine ⟨fun h2 ↦ ?_, degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f⟩
have h3 : natDegree (map f p) = natDegree p := by simp_rw [natDegree, h2]
have h4 : map f p ≠ 0 := by
rwa [ne_eq, ← degree_eq_bot, h2, degree_eq_bot]
rwa [← coeff_natDegree, ← coeff_map, ← h3, coeff_natDegree, ne_eq, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_map_eq_iff {f : R →+* S} {p : Polynomial R} :
natDegree (map f p) = natDegree p ↔ f (p.leadingCoeff) ≠ 0 ∨ natDegree p = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne (natDegree p) 0 with h|h
· simp_rw [h, ne_eq, or_true, iff_true, ← Nat.le_zero, ← h, natDegree_map_le f p]
have h2 : p ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp at h
have h3 : degree p ≠ (0 : ℕ) := degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne h
simp_rw [h, or_false, natDegree, WithBot.unbot'_eq_unbot'_iff, degree_map_eq_iff]
simp [h, h2, h3] -- simp doesn't rewrite in the hypothesis for some reason
tauto
theorem natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero (h : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0) : 0 < p.natDegree := by
rw [nextCoeff] at h
by_cases hpz : p.natDegree = 0
· simp_all only [ne_eq, zero_le, ite_true, not_true_eq_false]
· apply Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hpz
end Degree
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem natDegree_sub : (p - q).natDegree = (q - p).natDegree := by rw [← natDegree_neg, neg_sub]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sub Polynomial.natDegree_sub
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Lemmas.lean | 331 | 334 | theorem natDegree_sub_le_iff_left (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p - q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ p.natDegree ≤ n := by |
rw [← natDegree_neg] at qn
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, natDegree_add_le_iff_left _ _ qn]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import data.zmod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74ad1c88c77e799d2fea62801d1dbbd698cff1b7"
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* `valMinAbs` returns the integer closest to zero in the equivalence class.
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Submodule
open Function
namespace ZMod
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
#align zmod.val ZMod.val
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
#align zmod.val_lt ZMod.val_lt
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
#align zmod.val_le ZMod.val_le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
#align zmod.val_zero ZMod.val_zero
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
#align zmod.val_one' ZMod.val_one'
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
#align zmod.val_neg' ZMod.val_neg'
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
#align zmod.val_mul' ZMod.val_mul'
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_ofNat a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
#align zmod.val_nat_cast ZMod.val_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast := val_natCast
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
theorem val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast_of_lt := val_natCast_of_lt
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff' := by
intro k
cases' n with n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
#align zmod.add_order_of_one ZMod.addOrderOf_one
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
cases' a with a
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe ZMod.addOrderOf_coe
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe' ZMod.addOrderOf_coe'
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
#align zmod.ring_char_zmod_n ZMod.ringChar_zmod_n
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
#align zmod.nat_cast_self ZMod.natCast_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self := natCast_self
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
#align zmod.nat_cast_self' ZMod.natCast_self'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self' := natCast_self'
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
#align zmod.cast ZMod.cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
#align zmod.cast_zero ZMod.cast_zero
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.cast_eq_val ZMod.cast_eq_val
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.fst_zmod_cast Prod.fst_zmod_cast
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 199 | 202 | theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by |
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import data.set.intervals.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder `α`, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open, or
closed) using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side. For instance,
`Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
This file contains these definitions, and basic facts on inclusion, intersection, difference of
intervals (where the precise statements may depend on the properties of the order, in particular
for some statements it should be `LinearOrder` or `DenselyOrdered`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
/-- Left-open right-open interval -/
def Ioo (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ioo Set.Ioo
/-- Left-closed right-open interval -/
def Ico (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ico Set.Ico
/-- Left-infinite right-open interval -/
def Iio (a : α) :=
{ x | x < a }
#align set.Iio Set.Iio
/-- Left-closed right-closed interval -/
def Icc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Icc Set.Icc
/-- Left-infinite right-closed interval -/
def Iic (b : α) :=
{ x | x ≤ b }
#align set.Iic Set.Iic
/-- Left-open right-closed interval -/
def Ioc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Ioc Set.Ioc
/-- Left-closed right-infinite interval -/
def Ici (a : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x }
#align set.Ici Set.Ici
/-- Left-open right-infinite interval -/
def Ioi (a : α) :=
{ x | a < x }
#align set.Ioi Set.Ioi
theorem Ioo_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x < b } = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioo_def Set.Ioo_def
theorem Ico_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b } = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ico_def Set.Ico_def
theorem Iio_def (a : α) : { x | x < a } = Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.Iio_def Set.Iio_def
theorem Icc_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b } = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Icc_def Set.Icc_def
theorem Iic_def (b : α) : { x | x ≤ b } = Iic b :=
rfl
#align set.Iic_def Set.Iic_def
theorem Ioc_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b } = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioc_def Set.Ioc_def
theorem Ici_def (a : α) : { x | a ≤ x } = Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_def Set.Ici_def
theorem Ioi_def (a : α) : { x | a < x } = Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_def Set.Ioi_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioo Set.mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ico Set.mem_Ico
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iio Set.mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Icc Set.mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iic Set.mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioc Set.mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ici Set.mem_Ici
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioi Set.mem_Ioi
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioo Set.decidableMemIoo
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ico Set.decidableMemIco
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iio Set.decidableMemIio
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Icc Set.decidableMemIcc
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iic Set.decidableMemIic
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioc Set.decidableMemIoc
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ici Set.decidableMemIci
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioi Set.decidableMemIoi
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioo Set.left_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Ico Set.left_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Icc Set.left_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioc Set.left_mem_Ioc
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
#align set.left_mem_Ici Set.left_mem_Ici
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioo Set.right_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ico Set.right_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Icc Set.right_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioc Set.right_mem_Ioc
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
#align set.right_mem_Iic Set.right_mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ici : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Ici Set.dual_Ici
@[simp]
theorem dual_Iic : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Iic Set.dual_Iic
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioi : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Ioi Set.dual_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem dual_Iio : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Iio Set.dual_Iio
@[simp]
theorem dual_Icc : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Icc Set.dual_Icc
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioc : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ioc Set.dual_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ico : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ico Set.dual_Ico
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioo : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ioo Set.dual_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Icc Set.nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ico Set.nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ioc Set.nonempty_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ici Set.nonempty_Ici
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
#align set.nonempty_Iic Set.nonempty_Iic
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ioo Set.nonempty_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
#align set.nonempty_Ioi Set.nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
#align set.nonempty_Iio Set.nonempty_Iio
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Icc_subtype Set.nonempty_Icc_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ico_subtype Set.nonempty_Ico_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ioc_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioc_subtype
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
#align set.nonempty_Ici_subtype Set.nonempty_Ici_subtype
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
#align set.nonempty_Iic_subtype Set.nonempty_Iic_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ioo_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioo_subtype
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
#align set.nonempty_Ioi_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioi_subtype
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
#align set.nonempty_Iio_subtype Set.nonempty_Iio_subtype
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
#align set.Icc_eq_empty Set.Icc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
#align set.Ico_eq_empty Set.Ico_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty Set.Ioc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty Set.Ioo_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
#align set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt Set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ico_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ico_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ico_self Set.Ico_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ioc_self Set.Ioc_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ioo_self Set.Ioo_self
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
#align set.Ici_subset_Ici Set.Ici_subset_Ici
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align set.Iic_subset_Iic Set.Iic_subset_Iic
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
#align set.Ici_subset_Ioi Set.Ici_subset_Ioi
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
#align set.Iic_subset_Iio Set.Iic_subset_Iio
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico Set.Ico_subset_Ico
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_left Set.Ico_subset_Ico_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_right Set.Ico_subset_Ico_right
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc Set.Icc_subset_Icc
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_left Set.Icc_subset_Icc_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_right Set.Icc_subset_Icc_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioo Set.Icc_subset_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Icc_subset_Ici_self Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Icc_subset_Iic_self Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
#align set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
#align set.Icc_subset_Ico_right Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
#align set.Ico_subset_Icc_self Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
#align set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self Set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ico_subset_Iio_self Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic_self Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ico_subset_Ici_self Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
#align set.Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
#align set.Iio_ssubset_Iic_self Set.Iio_ssubset_Iic_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff Set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Iic_iff Set.Icc_subset_Iic_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ici_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ici_iff
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
#align set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
#align set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ioi Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici Set.Ioi_subset_Ici
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
#align set.Iio_subset_Iio Set.Iio_subset_Iio
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic Set.Iio_subset_Iic
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_inter_Iic Set.Ici_inter_Iic
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_inter_Iio Set.Ici_inter_Iio
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_inter_Iic Set.Ioi_inter_Iic
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_inter_Iio Set.Ioi_inter_Iio
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iic_inter_Ici Set.Iic_inter_Ici
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iio_inter_Ici Set.Iio_inter_Ici
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iic_inter_Ioi Set.Iic_inter_Ioi
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iio_inter_Ioi Set.Iio_inter_Ioi
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
#align set.mem_Ico_of_Ioo Set.mem_Ico_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
#align set.mem_Ioc_of_Ioo Set.mem_Ioc_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ico Set.mem_Icc_of_Ico
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ioc Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioc
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
#align set.mem_Ici_of_Ioi Set.mem_Ici_of_Ioi
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
#align set.mem_Iic_of_Iio Set.mem_Iic_of_Iio
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
#align set.Icc_eq_empty_iff Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
#align set.Ico_eq_empty_iff Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
#align is_top.Iic_eq IsTop.Iic_eq
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
#align is_bot.Ici_eq IsBot.Ici_eq
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ioi a = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => h.not_lt
#align is_max.Ioi_eq IsMax.Ioi_eq
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iio a = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => h.not_lt
#align is_min.Iio_eq IsMin.Iio_eq
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
#align set.Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le Set.Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
#align set.not_mem_Icc_of_lt Set.not_mem_Icc_of_lt
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
#align set.not_mem_Icc_of_gt Set.not_mem_Icc_of_gt
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
#align set.not_mem_Ico_of_lt Set.not_mem_Ico_of_lt
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
#align set.not_mem_Ioc_of_gt Set.not_mem_Ioc_of_gt
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
#align set.not_mem_Ioi_self Set.not_mem_Ioi_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
#align set.not_mem_Iio_self Set.not_mem_Iio_self
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
#align set.not_mem_Ioc_of_le Set.not_mem_Ioc_of_le
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
#align set.not_mem_Ico_of_ge Set.not_mem_Ico_of_ge
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
#align set.not_mem_Ioo_of_le Set.not_mem_Ioo_of_le
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
#align set.not_mem_Ioo_of_ge Set.not_mem_Ioo_of_ge
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align set.Icc_self Set.Icc_self
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h.subst <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h.subst <| right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
#align set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
#align set.subsingleton_Icc_of_ge Set.subsingleton_Icc_of_ge
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [ge_iff_le, gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
#align set.Icc_diff_left Set.Icc_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
#align set.Icc_diff_right Set.Icc_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
#align set.Ico_diff_left Set.Ico_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
#align set.Ioc_diff_right Set.Ioc_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
#align set.Icc_diff_both Set.Icc_diff_both
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
#align set.Ici_diff_left Set.Ici_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
#align set.Iic_diff_right Set.Iic_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
#align set.Ico_diff_Ioo_same Set.Ico_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
#align set.Ioc_diff_Ioo_same Set.Ioc_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ico_same Set.Icc_diff_Ico_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ioc_same Set.Icc_diff_Ioc_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ioo_same Set.Icc_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ioi_same Set.Ici_diff_Ioi_same
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iio_same Set.Iic_diff_Iio_same
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
#align set.Ioi_union_left Set.Ioi_union_left
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
#align set.Iio_union_right Set.Iio_union_right
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
#align set.Ioo_union_left Set.Ioo_union_left
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [dual_Ioo, dual_Ico] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
#align set.Ioo_union_right Set.Ioo_union_right
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
#align set.Ioc_union_left Set.Ioc_union_left
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [dual_Ioc, dual_Icc] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
#align set.Ico_union_right Set.Ico_union_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
#align set.Ico_insert_right Set.Ico_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
#align set.Ioc_insert_left Set.Ioc_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
#align set.Ioo_insert_left Set.Ioo_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
#align set.Ioo_insert_right Set.Ioo_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
#align set.Iio_insert Set.Iio_insert
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
#align set.Ioi_insert Set.Ioi_insert
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
#align set.mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset Set.mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
#align set.mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset Set.mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
#align set.mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset Set.mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset
theorem eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ico a b) : x = a ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
#align set.eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico Set.eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico
theorem eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.2.eq_or_lt.imp_right <| And.intro hmem.1
#align set.eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc Set.eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc
theorem eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Icc a b) :
x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
#align set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ici_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ici a = {a} :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => h.eq_of_ge⟩
#align is_max.Ici_eq IsMax.Ici_eq
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iic_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iic a = {a} :=
h.toDual.Ici_eq
#align is_min.Iic_eq IsMin.Iic_eq
theorem Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
#align set.Ici_injective Set.Ici_injective
theorem Iic_injective : Injective (Iic : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
#align set.Iic_injective Set.Iic_injective
theorem Ici_inj : Ici a = Ici b ↔ a = b :=
Ici_injective.eq_iff
#align set.Ici_inj Set.Ici_inj
theorem Iic_inj : Iic a = Iic b ↔ a = b :=
Iic_injective.eq_iff
#align set.Iic_inj Set.Iic_inj
end PartialOrder
section OrderTop
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} :=
isMax_top.Ici_eq
#align set.Ici_top Set.Ici_top
variable [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_top : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ :=
isMax_top.Ioi_eq
#align set.Ioi_top Set.Ioi_top
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ :=
isTop_top.Iic_eq
#align set.Iic_top Set.Iic_top
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top : Icc a ⊤ = Ici a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Icc_top Set.Icc_top
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top : Ioc a ⊤ = Ioi a := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.Ioc_top Set.Ioc_top
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} :=
isMin_bot.Iic_eq
#align set.Iic_bot Set.Iic_bot
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem Iio_bot : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ :=
isMin_bot.Iio_eq
#align set.Iio_bot Set.Iio_bot
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ :=
isBot_bot.Ici_eq
#align set.Ici_bot Set.Ici_bot
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot : Icc ⊥ a = Iic a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Icc_bot Set.Icc_bot
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot : Ico ⊥ a = Iio a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.Ico_bot Set.Ico_bot
end OrderBot
theorem Icc_bot_top [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] : Icc (⊥ : α) ⊤ = univ := by simp
#align set.Icc_bot_top Set.Icc_bot_top
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c d : α}
theorem not_mem_Ici : c ∉ Ici a ↔ c < a :=
not_le
#align set.not_mem_Ici Set.not_mem_Ici
theorem not_mem_Iic : c ∉ Iic b ↔ b < c :=
not_le
#align set.not_mem_Iic Set.not_mem_Iic
theorem not_mem_Ioi : c ∉ Ioi a ↔ c ≤ a :=
not_lt
#align set.not_mem_Ioi Set.not_mem_Ioi
theorem not_mem_Iio : c ∉ Iio b ↔ b ≤ c :=
not_lt
#align set.not_mem_Iio Set.not_mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem compl_Iic : (Iic a)ᶜ = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => not_le
#align set.compl_Iic Set.compl_Iic
@[simp]
theorem compl_Ici : (Ici a)ᶜ = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => not_le
#align set.compl_Ici Set.compl_Ici
@[simp]
theorem compl_Iio : (Iio a)ᶜ = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => not_lt
#align set.compl_Iio Set.compl_Iio
@[simp]
theorem compl_Ioi : (Ioi a)ᶜ = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => not_lt
#align set.compl_Ioi Set.compl_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ici : Ici a \ Ici b = Ico a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ici, Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ici Set.Ici_diff_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi : Ici a \ Ioi b = Icc a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ioi, Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ioi Set.Ici_diff_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_diff_Ioi : Ioi a \ Ioi b = Ioc a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ioi, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.Ioi_diff_Ioi Set.Ioi_diff_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_diff_Ici : Ioi a \ Ici b = Ioo a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ici, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.Ioi_diff_Ici Set.Ioi_diff_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iic : Iic b \ Iic a = Ioc a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iic, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iic Set.Iic_diff_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iio_diff_Iic : Iio b \ Iic a = Ioo a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iic, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.Iio_diff_Iic Set.Iio_diff_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio : Iic b \ Iio a = Icc a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iio, inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iio Set.Iic_diff_Iio
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 1,147 | 1,148 | theorem Iio_diff_Iio : Iio b \ Iio a = Ico a b := by |
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iio, inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iio]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.LinearMap
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.FG
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.ScaleRoots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.integral_closure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"641b6a82006416ec431b2987b354af9311fed4f2"
/-!
# Integral closure of a subring.
If A is an R-algebra then `a : A` is integral over R if it is a root of a monic polynomial
with coefficients in R. Enough theory is developed to prove that integral elements
form a sub-R-algebra of A.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a `CommRing` and let `A` be an R-algebra.
* `RingHom.IsIntegralElem (f : R →+* A) (x : A)` : `x` is integral with respect to the map `f`,
* `IsIntegral (x : A)` : `x` is integral over `R`, i.e., is a root of a monic polynomial with
coefficients in `R`.
* `integralClosure R A` : the integral closure of `R` in `A`, regarded as a sub-`R`-algebra of `A`.
-/
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial Submodule
section Ring
variable {R S A : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- An element `x` of `A` is said to be integral over `R` with respect to `f`
if it is a root of a monic polynomial `p : R[X]` evaluated under `f` -/
def RingHom.IsIntegralElem (f : R →+* A) (x : A) :=
∃ p : R[X], Monic p ∧ eval₂ f x p = 0
#align ring_hom.is_integral_elem RingHom.IsIntegralElem
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : R →+* A` is said to be integral
if every element `A` is integral with respect to the map `f` -/
def RingHom.IsIntegral (f : R →+* A) :=
∀ x : A, f.IsIntegralElem x
#align ring_hom.is_integral RingHom.IsIntegral
variable [Algebra R A] (R)
/-- An element `x` of an algebra `A` over a commutative ring `R` is said to be *integral*,
if it is a root of some monic polynomial `p : R[X]`.
Equivalently, the element is integral over `R` with respect to the induced `algebraMap` -/
def IsIntegral (x : A) : Prop :=
(algebraMap R A).IsIntegralElem x
#align is_integral IsIntegral
variable (A)
/-- An algebra is integral if every element of the extension is integral over the base ring -/
protected class Algebra.IsIntegral : Prop :=
isIntegral : ∀ x : A, IsIntegral R x
#align algebra.is_integral Algebra.IsIntegral
variable {R A}
lemma Algebra.isIntegral_def : Algebra.IsIntegral R A ↔ ∀ x : A, IsIntegral R x :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem RingHom.isIntegralElem_map {x : R} : f.IsIntegralElem (f x) :=
⟨X - C x, monic_X_sub_C _, by simp⟩
#align ring_hom.is_integral_map RingHom.isIntegralElem_map
theorem isIntegral_algebraMap {x : R} : IsIntegral R (algebraMap R A x) :=
(algebraMap R A).isIntegralElem_map
#align is_integral_algebra_map isIntegral_algebraMap
end Ring
section
variable {R A B S : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Ring B] [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (f : R →+* S)
theorem IsIntegral.map {B C F : Type*} [Ring B] [Ring C] [Algebra R B] [Algebra A B] [Algebra R C]
[IsScalarTower R A B] [Algebra A C] [IsScalarTower R A C] {b : B}
[FunLike F B C] [AlgHomClass F A B C] (f : F)
(hb : IsIntegral R b) : IsIntegral R (f b) := by
obtain ⟨P, hP⟩ := hb
refine ⟨P, hP.1, ?_⟩
rw [← aeval_def, ← aeval_map_algebraMap A,
aeval_algHom_apply, aeval_map_algebraMap, aeval_def, hP.2, _root_.map_zero]
#align map_is_integral IsIntegral.map
theorem IsIntegral.map_of_comp_eq {R S T U : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring S]
[CommRing T] [Ring U] [Algebra R S] [Algebra T U] (φ : R →+* T) (ψ : S →+* U)
(h : (algebraMap T U).comp φ = ψ.comp (algebraMap R S)) {a : S} (ha : IsIntegral R a) :
IsIntegral T (ψ a) :=
let ⟨p, hp⟩ := ha
⟨p.map φ, hp.1.map _, by
rw [← eval_map, map_map, h, ← map_map, eval_map, eval₂_at_apply, eval_map, hp.2, ψ.map_zero]⟩
#align is_integral_map_of_comp_eq_of_is_integral IsIntegral.map_of_comp_eq
section
variable {A B : Type*} [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f)
theorem isIntegral_algHom_iff {x : A} : IsIntegral R (f x) ↔ IsIntegral R x := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨p, hp, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩, IsIntegral.map f⟩
rwa [← f.comp_algebraMap, ← AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, ← hom_eval₂, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom,
map_eq_zero_iff f hf] at hx
#align is_integral_alg_hom_iff isIntegral_algHom_iff
theorem Algebra.IsIntegral.of_injective [Algebra.IsIntegral R B] : Algebra.IsIntegral R A :=
⟨fun _ ↦ (isIntegral_algHom_iff f hf).mp (isIntegral _)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem isIntegral_algEquiv {A B : Type*} [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
(f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) {x : A} : IsIntegral R (f x) ↔ IsIntegral R x :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.map f.symm, IsIntegral.map f⟩
#align is_integral_alg_equiv isIntegral_algEquiv
/-- If `R → A → B` is an algebra tower,
then if the entire tower is an integral extension so is `A → B`. -/
theorem IsIntegral.tower_top [Algebra A B] [IsScalarTower R A B] {x : B}
(hx : IsIntegral R x) : IsIntegral A x :=
let ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩ := hx
⟨p.map <| algebraMap R A, hp.map _, by rw [← aeval_def, aeval_map_algebraMap, aeval_def, hpx]⟩
#align is_integral_of_is_scalar_tower IsIntegral.tower_top
#align is_integral_tower_top_of_is_integral IsIntegral.tower_top
theorem map_isIntegral_int {B C F : Type*} [Ring B] [Ring C] {b : B}
[FunLike F B C] [RingHomClass F B C] (f : F)
(hb : IsIntegral ℤ b) : IsIntegral ℤ (f b) :=
hb.map (f : B →+* C).toIntAlgHom
#align map_is_integral_int map_isIntegral_int
theorem IsIntegral.of_subring {x : B} (T : Subring R) (hx : IsIntegral T x) : IsIntegral R x :=
hx.tower_top
#align is_integral_of_subring IsIntegral.of_subring
protected theorem IsIntegral.algebraMap [Algebra A B] [IsScalarTower R A B] {x : A}
(h : IsIntegral R x) : IsIntegral R (algebraMap A B x) := by
rcases h with ⟨f, hf, hx⟩
use f, hf
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq R A B, ← hom_eval₂, hx, RingHom.map_zero]
#align is_integral.algebra_map IsIntegral.algebraMap
theorem isIntegral_algebraMap_iff [Algebra A B] [IsScalarTower R A B] {x : A}
(hAB : Function.Injective (algebraMap A B)) :
IsIntegral R (algebraMap A B x) ↔ IsIntegral R x :=
isIntegral_algHom_iff (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A B) hAB
#align is_integral_algebra_map_iff isIntegral_algebraMap_iff
theorem isIntegral_iff_isIntegral_closure_finite {r : B} :
IsIntegral R r ↔ ∃ s : Set R, s.Finite ∧ IsIntegral (Subring.closure s) r := by
constructor <;> intro hr
· rcases hr with ⟨p, hmp, hpr⟩
refine ⟨_, Finset.finite_toSet _, p.restriction, monic_restriction.2 hmp, ?_⟩
rw [← aeval_def, ← aeval_map_algebraMap R r p.restriction, map_restriction, aeval_def, hpr]
rcases hr with ⟨s, _, hsr⟩
exact hsr.of_subring _
#align is_integral_iff_is_integral_closure_finite isIntegral_iff_isIntegral_closure_finite
theorem Submodule.span_range_natDegree_eq_adjoin {R A} [CommRing R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
{x : A} {f : R[X]} (hf : f.Monic) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) :
span R (Finset.image (x ^ ·) (Finset.range (natDegree f))) =
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (Algebra.adjoin R {x}) := by
nontriviality A
have hf1 : f ≠ 1 := by rintro rfl; simp [one_ne_zero' A] at hfx
refine (span_le.mpr fun s hs ↦ ?_).antisymm fun r hr ↦ ?_
· rcases Finset.mem_image.1 hs with ⟨k, -, rfl⟩
exact (Algebra.adjoin R {x}).pow_mem (Algebra.subset_adjoin rfl) k
rw [Subalgebra.mem_toSubmodule, Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval] at hr
rcases (aeval x).mem_range.mp hr with ⟨p, rfl⟩
rw [← modByMonic_add_div p hf, map_add, map_mul, hfx,
zero_mul, add_zero, ← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq (p %ₘ f), aeval_def, eval₂_sum, sum_def]
refine sum_mem fun k hkq ↦ ?_
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eval₂_monomial, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span <| Finset.mem_image_of_mem _ <| Finset.mem_range.mpr <|
(le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hkq).trans_lt <| natDegree_modByMonic_lt p hf hf1)
theorem IsIntegral.fg_adjoin_singleton {x : B} (hx : IsIntegral R x) :
(Algebra.adjoin R {x}).toSubmodule.FG := by
rcases hx with ⟨f, hfm, hfx⟩
use (Finset.range <| f.natDegree).image (x ^ ·)
exact span_range_natDegree_eq_adjoin hfm (by rwa [aeval_def])
theorem fg_adjoin_of_finite {s : Set A} (hfs : s.Finite) (his : ∀ x ∈ s, IsIntegral R x) :
(Algebra.adjoin R s).toSubmodule.FG :=
Set.Finite.induction_on hfs
(fun _ =>
⟨{1},
Submodule.ext fun x => by
rw [Algebra.adjoin_empty, Finset.coe_singleton, ← one_eq_span, Algebra.toSubmodule_bot]⟩)
(fun {a s} _ _ ih his => by
rw [← Set.union_singleton, Algebra.adjoin_union_coe_submodule]
exact
FG.mul (ih fun i hi => his i <| Set.mem_insert_of_mem a hi)
(his a <| Set.mem_insert a s).fg_adjoin_singleton)
his
#align fg_adjoin_of_finite fg_adjoin_of_finite
theorem isNoetherian_adjoin_finset [IsNoetherianRing R] (s : Finset A)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, IsIntegral R x) : IsNoetherian R (Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A)) :=
isNoetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian _ (fg_adjoin_of_finite s.finite_toSet hs)
#align is_noetherian_adjoin_finset isNoetherian_adjoin_finset
instance Module.End.isIntegral {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module.Finite R M] :
Algebra.IsIntegral R (Module.End R M) :=
⟨LinearMap.exists_monic_and_aeval_eq_zero R⟩
#align module.End.is_integral Module.End.isIntegral
variable (R)
theorem IsIntegral.of_finite [Module.Finite R B] (x : B) : IsIntegral R x :=
(isIntegral_algHom_iff (Algebra.lmul R B) Algebra.lmul_injective).mp
(Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral _)
variable (B)
instance Algebra.IsIntegral.of_finite [Module.Finite R B] : Algebra.IsIntegral R B :=
⟨.of_finite R⟩
#align algebra.is_integral.of_finite Algebra.IsIntegral.of_finite
variable {R B}
/-- If `S` is a sub-`R`-algebra of `A` and `S` is finitely-generated as an `R`-module,
then all elements of `S` are integral over `R`. -/
theorem IsIntegral.of_mem_of_fg {A} [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (S : Subalgebra R A)
(HS : S.toSubmodule.FG) (x : A) (hx : x ∈ S) : IsIntegral R x :=
have : Module.Finite R S := ⟨(fg_top _).mpr HS⟩
(isIntegral_algHom_iff S.val Subtype.val_injective).mpr (.of_finite R (⟨x, hx⟩ : S))
#align is_integral_of_mem_of_fg IsIntegral.of_mem_of_fg
theorem isIntegral_of_noetherian (_ : IsNoetherian R B) (x : B) : IsIntegral R x :=
.of_finite R x
#align is_integral_of_noetherian isIntegral_of_noetherian
theorem isIntegral_of_submodule_noetherian (S : Subalgebra R B)
(H : IsNoetherian R (Subalgebra.toSubmodule S)) (x : B) (hx : x ∈ S) : IsIntegral R x :=
.of_mem_of_fg _ ((fg_top _).mp <| H.noetherian _) _ hx
#align is_integral_of_submodule_noetherian isIntegral_of_submodule_noetherian
/-- Suppose `A` is an `R`-algebra, `M` is an `A`-module such that `a • m ≠ 0` for all non-zero `a`
and `m`. If `x : A` fixes a nontrivial f.g. `R`-submodule `N` of `M`, then `x` is `R`-integral. -/
theorem isIntegral_of_smul_mem_submodule {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower R A M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors A M] (N : Submodule R M) (hN : N ≠ ⊥) (hN' : N.FG)
(x : A) (hx : ∀ n ∈ N, x • n ∈ N) : IsIntegral R x := by
let A' : Subalgebra R A :=
{ carrier := { x | ∀ n ∈ N, x • n ∈ N }
mul_mem' := fun {a b} ha hb n hn => smul_smul a b n ▸ ha _ (hb _ hn)
one_mem' := fun n hn => (one_smul A n).symm ▸ hn
add_mem' := fun {a b} ha hb n hn => (add_smul a b n).symm ▸ N.add_mem (ha _ hn) (hb _ hn)
zero_mem' := fun n _hn => (zero_smul A n).symm ▸ N.zero_mem
algebraMap_mem' := fun r n hn => (algebraMap_smul A r n).symm ▸ N.smul_mem r hn }
let f : A' →ₐ[R] Module.End R N :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap
{ toFun := fun x => (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M x).restrict x.prop
-- Porting note: was
-- `fun x y => LinearMap.ext fun n => Subtype.ext <| add_smul x y n`
map_add' := by intros x y; ext; exact add_smul _ _ _
-- Porting note: was
-- `fun r s => LinearMap.ext fun n => Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r s n`
map_smul' := by intros r s; ext; apply smul_assoc }
-- Porting note: the next two lines were
--`(LinearMap.ext fun n => Subtype.ext <| one_smul _ _) fun x y =>`
--`LinearMap.ext fun n => Subtype.ext <| mul_smul x y n`
(by ext; apply one_smul)
(by intros x y; ext; apply mul_smul)
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ : ∃ a ∈ N, a ≠ (0 : M) := by
by_contra! h'
apply hN
rwa [eq_bot_iff]
have : Function.Injective f := by
show Function.Injective f.toLinearMap
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, eq_bot_iff]
intro s hs
have : s.1 • a = 0 := congr_arg Subtype.val (LinearMap.congr_fun hs ⟨a, ha₁⟩)
exact Subtype.ext ((eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero this).resolve_right ha₂)
show IsIntegral R (A'.val ⟨x, hx⟩)
rw [isIntegral_algHom_iff A'.val Subtype.val_injective, ← isIntegral_algHom_iff f this]
haveI : Module.Finite R N := by rwa [Module.finite_def, Submodule.fg_top]
apply Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral
#align is_integral_of_smul_mem_submodule isIntegral_of_smul_mem_submodule
variable {f}
theorem RingHom.Finite.to_isIntegral (h : f.Finite) : f.IsIntegral :=
letI := f.toAlgebra
fun _ ↦ IsIntegral.of_mem_of_fg ⊤ h.1 _ trivial
#align ring_hom.finite.to_is_integral RingHom.Finite.to_isIntegral
alias RingHom.IsIntegral.of_finite := RingHom.Finite.to_isIntegral
#align ring_hom.is_integral.of_finite RingHom.IsIntegral.of_finite
/-- The [Kurosh problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurosh_problem) asks to show that
this is still true when `A` is not necessarily commutative and `R` is a field, but it has
been solved in the negative. See https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.02383.pdf for criteria for a
finitely generated algebraic (= integral) algebra over a field to be finite dimensional.
This could be an `instance`, but we tend to go from `Module.Finite` to `IsIntegral`/`IsAlgebraic`,
and making it an instance will cause the search to be complicated a lot.
-/
theorem Algebra.IsIntegral.finite [Algebra.IsIntegral R A] [h' : Algebra.FiniteType R A] :
Module.Finite R A :=
have ⟨s, hs⟩ := h'
⟨by apply hs ▸ fg_adjoin_of_finite s.finite_toSet fun x _ ↦ Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral x⟩
#align algebra.is_integral.finite Algebra.IsIntegral.finite
/-- finite = integral + finite type -/
theorem Algebra.finite_iff_isIntegral_and_finiteType :
Module.Finite R A ↔ Algebra.IsIntegral R A ∧ Algebra.FiniteType R A :=
⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨⟨.of_finite R⟩, inferInstance⟩, fun ⟨h, _⟩ ↦ h.finite⟩
#align algebra.finite_iff_is_integral_and_finite_type Algebra.finite_iff_isIntegral_and_finiteType
theorem RingHom.IsIntegral.to_finite (h : f.IsIntegral) (h' : f.FiniteType) : f.Finite :=
let _ := f.toAlgebra
let _ : Algebra.IsIntegral R S := ⟨h⟩
Algebra.IsIntegral.finite (h' := h')
#align ring_hom.is_integral.to_finite RingHom.IsIntegral.to_finite
alias RingHom.Finite.of_isIntegral_of_finiteType := RingHom.IsIntegral.to_finite
#align ring_hom.finite.of_is_integral_of_finite_type RingHom.Finite.of_isIntegral_of_finiteType
/-- finite = integral + finite type -/
theorem RingHom.finite_iff_isIntegral_and_finiteType : f.Finite ↔ f.IsIntegral ∧ f.FiniteType :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.to_isIntegral, h.to_finiteType⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ ↦ h.to_finite h'⟩
#align ring_hom.finite_iff_is_integral_and_finite_type RingHom.finite_iff_isIntegral_and_finiteType
variable (f)
theorem RingHom.IsIntegralElem.of_mem_closure {x y z : S} (hx : f.IsIntegralElem x)
(hy : f.IsIntegralElem y) (hz : z ∈ Subring.closure ({x, y} : Set S)) : f.IsIntegralElem z := by
letI : Algebra R S := f.toAlgebra
have := (IsIntegral.fg_adjoin_singleton hx).mul (IsIntegral.fg_adjoin_singleton hy)
rw [← Algebra.adjoin_union_coe_submodule, Set.singleton_union] at this
exact
IsIntegral.of_mem_of_fg (Algebra.adjoin R {x, y}) this z
(Algebra.mem_adjoin_iff.2 <| Subring.closure_mono Set.subset_union_right hz)
#align ring_hom.is_integral_of_mem_closure RingHom.IsIntegralElem.of_mem_closure
nonrec theorem IsIntegral.of_mem_closure {x y z : A} (hx : IsIntegral R x) (hy : IsIntegral R y)
(hz : z ∈ Subring.closure ({x, y} : Set A)) : IsIntegral R z :=
hx.of_mem_closure (algebraMap R A) hy hz
#align is_integral_of_mem_closure IsIntegral.of_mem_closure
variable (f : R →+* B)
theorem RingHom.isIntegralElem_zero : f.IsIntegralElem 0 :=
f.map_zero ▸ f.isIntegralElem_map
#align ring_hom.is_integral_zero RingHom.isIntegralElem_zero
theorem isIntegral_zero : IsIntegral R (0 : B) :=
(algebraMap R B).isIntegralElem_zero
#align is_integral_zero isIntegral_zero
theorem RingHom.isIntegralElem_one : f.IsIntegralElem 1 :=
f.map_one ▸ f.isIntegralElem_map
#align ring_hom.is_integral_one RingHom.isIntegralElem_one
theorem isIntegral_one : IsIntegral R (1 : B) :=
(algebraMap R B).isIntegralElem_one
#align is_integral_one isIntegral_one
theorem RingHom.IsIntegralElem.add (f : R →+* S) {x y : S}
(hx : f.IsIntegralElem x) (hy : f.IsIntegralElem y) :
f.IsIntegralElem (x + y) :=
hx.of_mem_closure f hy <|
Subring.add_mem _ (Subring.subset_closure (Or.inl rfl)) (Subring.subset_closure (Or.inr rfl))
#align ring_hom.is_integral_add RingHom.IsIntegralElem.add
nonrec theorem IsIntegral.add {x y : A} (hx : IsIntegral R x) (hy : IsIntegral R y) :
IsIntegral R (x + y) :=
hx.add (algebraMap R A) hy
#align is_integral_add IsIntegral.add
variable (f : R →+* S)
-- can be generalized to noncommutative S.
theorem RingHom.IsIntegralElem.neg {x : S} (hx : f.IsIntegralElem x) : f.IsIntegralElem (-x) :=
hx.of_mem_closure f hx (Subring.neg_mem _ (Subring.subset_closure (Or.inl rfl)))
#align ring_hom.is_integral_neg RingHom.IsIntegralElem.neg
theorem IsIntegral.neg {x : B} (hx : IsIntegral R x) : IsIntegral R (-x) :=
.of_mem_of_fg _ hx.fg_adjoin_singleton _ (Subalgebra.neg_mem _ <| Algebra.subset_adjoin rfl)
#align is_integral_neg IsIntegral.neg
theorem RingHom.IsIntegralElem.sub {x y : S} (hx : f.IsIntegralElem x) (hy : f.IsIntegralElem y) :
f.IsIntegralElem (x - y) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hx.add f (hy.neg f)
#align ring_hom.is_integral_sub RingHom.IsIntegralElem.sub
nonrec theorem IsIntegral.sub {x y : A} (hx : IsIntegral R x) (hy : IsIntegral R y) :
IsIntegral R (x - y) :=
hx.sub (algebraMap R A) hy
#align is_integral_sub IsIntegral.sub
theorem RingHom.IsIntegralElem.mul {x y : S} (hx : f.IsIntegralElem x) (hy : f.IsIntegralElem y) :
f.IsIntegralElem (x * y) :=
hx.of_mem_closure f hy
(Subring.mul_mem _ (Subring.subset_closure (Or.inl rfl)) (Subring.subset_closure (Or.inr rfl)))
#align ring_hom.is_integral_mul RingHom.IsIntegralElem.mul
nonrec theorem IsIntegral.mul {x y : A} (hx : IsIntegral R x) (hy : IsIntegral R y) :
IsIntegral R (x * y) :=
hx.mul (algebraMap R A) hy
#align is_integral_mul IsIntegral.mul
theorem IsIntegral.smul {R} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R B] [Algebra S B] [Algebra R S]
[IsScalarTower R S B] {x : B} (r : R)(hx : IsIntegral S x) : IsIntegral S (r • x) :=
.of_mem_of_fg _ hx.fg_adjoin_singleton _ <| by
rw [← algebraMap_smul S]; apply Subalgebra.smul_mem; exact Algebra.subset_adjoin rfl
#align is_integral_smul IsIntegral.smul
theorem IsIntegral.of_pow {x : B} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (hx : IsIntegral R <| x ^ n) :
IsIntegral R x := by
rcases hx with ⟨p, hmonic, heval⟩
exact ⟨expand R n p, hmonic.expand hn, by rwa [← aeval_def, expand_aeval]⟩
#align is_integral_of_pow IsIntegral.of_pow
variable (R A)
/-- The integral closure of R in an R-algebra A. -/
def integralClosure : Subalgebra R A where
carrier := { r | IsIntegral R r }
zero_mem' := isIntegral_zero
one_mem' := isIntegral_one
add_mem' := IsIntegral.add
mul_mem' := IsIntegral.mul
algebraMap_mem' _ := isIntegral_algebraMap
#align integral_closure integralClosure
theorem mem_integralClosure_iff_mem_fg {r : A} :
r ∈ integralClosure R A ↔ ∃ M : Subalgebra R A, M.toSubmodule.FG ∧ r ∈ M :=
⟨fun hr =>
⟨Algebra.adjoin R {r}, hr.fg_adjoin_singleton, Algebra.subset_adjoin rfl⟩,
fun ⟨M, Hf, hrM⟩ => .of_mem_of_fg M Hf _ hrM⟩
#align mem_integral_closure_iff_mem_fg mem_integralClosure_iff_mem_fg
variable {R A}
theorem adjoin_le_integralClosure {x : A} (hx : IsIntegral R x) :
Algebra.adjoin R {x} ≤ integralClosure R A := by
rw [Algebra.adjoin_le_iff]
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact hx
#align adjoin_le_integral_closure adjoin_le_integralClosure
theorem le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral {S : Subalgebra R A} :
S ≤ integralClosure R A ↔ Algebra.IsIntegral R S :=
SetLike.forall.symm.trans <|
(forall_congr' fun x =>
show IsIntegral R (algebraMap S A x) ↔ IsIntegral R x from
isIntegral_algebraMap_iff Subtype.coe_injective).trans
Algebra.isIntegral_def.symm
#align le_integral_closure_iff_is_integral le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral
theorem Algebra.isIntegral_sup {S T : Subalgebra R A} :
Algebra.IsIntegral R (S ⊔ T : Subalgebra R A) ↔
Algebra.IsIntegral R S ∧ Algebra.IsIntegral R T := by
simp only [← le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral, sup_le_iff]
#align is_integral_sup Algebra.isIntegral_sup
/-- Mapping an integral closure along an `AlgEquiv` gives the integral closure. -/
theorem integralClosure_map_algEquiv [Algebra R S] (f : A ≃ₐ[R] S) :
(integralClosure R A).map (f : A →ₐ[R] S) = integralClosure R S := by
ext y
rw [Subalgebra.mem_map]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact hx.map f
· intro hy
use f.symm y, hy.map (f.symm : S →ₐ[R] A)
simp
#align integral_closure_map_alg_equiv integralClosure_map_algEquiv
/-- An `AlgHom` between two rings restrict to an `AlgHom` between the integral closures inside
them. -/
def AlgHom.mapIntegralClosure [Algebra R S] (f : A →ₐ[R] S) :
integralClosure R A →ₐ[R] integralClosure R S :=
(f.restrictDomain (integralClosure R A)).codRestrict (integralClosure R S) (fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h.map f)
@[simp]
theorem AlgHom.coe_mapIntegralClosure [Algebra R S] (f : A →ₐ[R] S)
(x : integralClosure R A) : (f.mapIntegralClosure x : S) = f (x : A) := rfl
/-- An `AlgEquiv` between two rings restrict to an `AlgEquiv` between the integral closures inside
them. -/
def AlgEquiv.mapIntegralClosure [Algebra R S] (f : A ≃ₐ[R] S) :
integralClosure R A ≃ₐ[R] integralClosure R S :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[R] S).mapIntegralClosure (f.symm : S →ₐ[R] A).mapIntegralClosure
(AlgHom.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext (f.right_inv _))
(AlgHom.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext (f.left_inv _))
@[simp]
theorem AlgEquiv.coe_mapIntegralClosure [Algebra R S] (f : A ≃ₐ[R] S)
(x : integralClosure R A) : (f.mapIntegralClosure x : S) = f (x : A) := rfl
theorem integralClosure.isIntegral (x : integralClosure R A) : IsIntegral R x :=
let ⟨p, hpm, hpx⟩ := x.2
⟨p, hpm,
Subtype.eq <| by
rwa [← aeval_def, ← Subalgebra.val_apply, aeval_algHom_apply] at hpx⟩
#align integral_closure.is_integral integralClosure.isIntegral
instance integralClosure.AlgebraIsIntegral : Algebra.IsIntegral R (integralClosure R A) :=
⟨integralClosure.isIntegral⟩
theorem IsIntegral.of_mul_unit {x y : B} {r : R} (hr : algebraMap R B r * y = 1)
(hx : IsIntegral R (x * y)) : IsIntegral R x := by
obtain ⟨p, p_monic, hp⟩ := hx
refine ⟨scaleRoots p r, (monic_scaleRoots_iff r).2 p_monic, ?_⟩
convert scaleRoots_aeval_eq_zero hp
rw [Algebra.commutes] at hr ⊢
rw [mul_assoc, hr, mul_one]; rfl
#align is_integral_of_is_integral_mul_unit IsIntegral.of_mul_unit
theorem RingHom.IsIntegralElem.of_mul_unit (x y : S) (r : R) (hr : f r * y = 1)
(hx : f.IsIntegralElem (x * y)) : f.IsIntegralElem x :=
letI : Algebra R S := f.toAlgebra
IsIntegral.of_mul_unit hr hx
#align ring_hom.is_integral_of_is_integral_mul_unit RingHom.IsIntegralElem.of_mul_unit
/-- Generalization of `IsIntegral.of_mem_closure` bootstrapped up from that lemma -/
theorem IsIntegral.of_mem_closure' (G : Set A) (hG : ∀ x ∈ G, IsIntegral R x) :
∀ x ∈ Subring.closure G, IsIntegral R x := fun _ hx ↦
Subring.closure_induction hx hG isIntegral_zero isIntegral_one (fun _ _ ↦ IsIntegral.add)
(fun _ ↦ IsIntegral.neg) fun _ _ ↦ IsIntegral.mul
#align is_integral_of_mem_closure' IsIntegral.of_mem_closure'
theorem IsIntegral.of_mem_closure'' {S : Type*} [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S} (G : Set S)
(hG : ∀ x ∈ G, f.IsIntegralElem x) : ∀ x ∈ Subring.closure G, f.IsIntegralElem x := fun x hx =>
@IsIntegral.of_mem_closure' R S _ _ f.toAlgebra G hG x hx
#align is_integral_of_mem_closure'' IsIntegral.of_mem_closure''
theorem IsIntegral.pow {x : B} (h : IsIntegral R x) (n : ℕ) : IsIntegral R (x ^ n) :=
.of_mem_of_fg _ h.fg_adjoin_singleton _ <|
Subalgebra.pow_mem _ (by exact Algebra.subset_adjoin rfl) _
#align is_integral.pow IsIntegral.pow
theorem IsIntegral.nsmul {x : B} (h : IsIntegral R x) (n : ℕ) : IsIntegral R (n • x) :=
h.smul n
#align is_integral.nsmul IsIntegral.nsmul
theorem IsIntegral.zsmul {x : B} (h : IsIntegral R x) (n : ℤ) : IsIntegral R (n • x) :=
h.smul n
#align is_integral.zsmul IsIntegral.zsmul
theorem IsIntegral.multiset_prod {s : Multiset A} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, IsIntegral R x) :
IsIntegral R s.prod :=
(integralClosure R A).multiset_prod_mem h
#align is_integral.multiset_prod IsIntegral.multiset_prod
theorem IsIntegral.multiset_sum {s : Multiset A} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, IsIntegral R x) :
IsIntegral R s.sum :=
(integralClosure R A).multiset_sum_mem h
#align is_integral.multiset_sum IsIntegral.multiset_sum
theorem IsIntegral.prod {α : Type*} {s : Finset α} (f : α → A) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, IsIntegral R (f x)) :
IsIntegral R (∏ x ∈ s, f x) :=
(integralClosure R A).prod_mem h
#align is_integral.prod IsIntegral.prod
theorem IsIntegral.sum {α : Type*} {s : Finset α} (f : α → A) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, IsIntegral R (f x)) :
IsIntegral R (∑ x ∈ s, f x) :=
(integralClosure R A).sum_mem h
#align is_integral.sum IsIntegral.sum
theorem IsIntegral.det {n : Type*} [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix n n A}
(h : ∀ i j, IsIntegral R (M i j)) : IsIntegral R M.det := by
rw [Matrix.det_apply]
exact IsIntegral.sum _ fun σ _hσ ↦ (IsIntegral.prod _ fun i _hi => h _ _).zsmul _
#align is_integral.det IsIntegral.det
@[simp]
theorem IsIntegral.pow_iff {x : A} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : IsIntegral R (x ^ n) ↔ IsIntegral R x :=
⟨IsIntegral.of_pow hn, fun hx ↦ hx.pow n⟩
#align is_integral.pow_iff IsIntegral.pow_iff
open TensorProduct
theorem IsIntegral.tmul (x : A) {y : B} (h : IsIntegral R y) : IsIntegral A (x ⊗ₜ[R] y) := by
rw [← mul_one x, ← smul_eq_mul, ← smul_tmul']
exact smul _ (h.map_of_comp_eq (algebraMap R A)
(Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight (R := R) (A := A) (B := B)).toRingHom
Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeftRingHom_comp_algebraMap)
#align is_integral.tmul IsIntegral.tmul
section
variable (p : R[X]) (x : S)
/-- The monic polynomial whose roots are `p.leadingCoeff * x` for roots `x` of `p`. -/
noncomputable def normalizeScaleRoots (p : R[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i (if i = p.natDegree then 1 else p.coeff i * p.leadingCoeff ^ (p.natDegree - 1 - i))
#align normalize_scale_roots normalizeScaleRoots
theorem normalizeScaleRoots_coeff_mul_leadingCoeff_pow (i : ℕ) (hp : 1 ≤ natDegree p) :
(normalizeScaleRoots p).coeff i * p.leadingCoeff ^ i =
p.coeff i * p.leadingCoeff ^ (p.natDegree - 1) := by
simp only [normalizeScaleRoots, finset_sum_coeff, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq', one_mul,
zero_mul, mem_support_iff, ite_mul, Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· simp [h₁]
· rw [h₂, leadingCoeff, ← pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le hp]
· rw [mul_assoc, ← pow_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
apply Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
exact ⟨le_natDegree_of_ne_zero h₁, h₂⟩
#align normalize_scale_roots_coeff_mul_leading_coeff_pow normalizeScaleRoots_coeff_mul_leadingCoeff_pow
theorem leadingCoeff_smul_normalizeScaleRoots (p : R[X]) :
p.leadingCoeff • normalizeScaleRoots p = scaleRoots p p.leadingCoeff := by
ext
simp only [coeff_scaleRoots, normalizeScaleRoots, coeff_monomial, coeff_smul, Finset.smul_sum,
Ne, Finset.sum_ite_eq', finset_sum_coeff, smul_ite, smul_zero, mem_support_iff]
-- Porting note: added the following `simp only`
simp only [ge_iff_le, tsub_le_iff_right, smul_eq_mul, mul_ite, mul_one, mul_zero,
Finset.sum_ite_eq', mem_support_iff, ne_eq, ite_not]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· simp [*]
· simp [*]
· rw [mul_comm, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ, tsub_right_comm,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff]
exact tsub_pos_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero h₁) h₂)
#align leading_coeff_smul_normalize_scale_roots leadingCoeff_smul_normalizeScaleRoots
theorem normalizeScaleRoots_support : (normalizeScaleRoots p).support ≤ p.support := by
intro x
contrapose
simp only [not_mem_support_iff, normalizeScaleRoots, finset_sum_coeff, coeff_monomial,
Finset.sum_ite_eq', mem_support_iff, Ne, Classical.not_not, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h₁ h₂
exact (h₂ h₁).elim
#align normalize_scale_roots_support normalizeScaleRoots_support
theorem normalizeScaleRoots_degree : (normalizeScaleRoots p).degree = p.degree := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Finset.sup_mono (normalizeScaleRoots_support p)
· rw [← degree_scaleRoots, ← leadingCoeff_smul_normalizeScaleRoots]
exact degree_smul_le _ _
#align normalize_scale_roots_degree normalizeScaleRoots_degree
theorem normalizeScaleRoots_eval₂_leadingCoeff_mul (h : 1 ≤ p.natDegree) (f : R →+* S) (x : S) :
(normalizeScaleRoots p).eval₂ f (f p.leadingCoeff * x) =
f p.leadingCoeff ^ (p.natDegree - 1) * p.eval₂ f x := by
rw [eval₂_eq_sum_range, eval₂_eq_sum_range, Finset.mul_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr
· rw [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (normalizeScaleRoots_degree p)]
intro n _hn
rw [mul_pow, ← mul_assoc, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_mul,
normalizeScaleRoots_coeff_mul_leadingCoeff_pow _ _ h, f.map_mul, f.map_pow]
ring
#align normalize_scale_roots_eval₂_leading_coeff_mul normalizeScaleRoots_eval₂_leadingCoeff_mul
theorem normalizeScaleRoots_monic (h : p ≠ 0) : (normalizeScaleRoots p).Monic := by
delta Monic leadingCoeff
rw [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (normalizeScaleRoots_degree p)]
suffices p = 0 → (0 : R) = 1 by simpa [normalizeScaleRoots, coeff_monomial]
exact fun h' => (h h').elim
#align normalize_scale_roots_monic normalizeScaleRoots_monic
/-- Given a `p : R[X]` and a `x : S` such that `p.eval₂ f x = 0`,
`f p.leadingCoeff * x` is integral. -/
theorem RingHom.isIntegralElem_leadingCoeff_mul (h : p.eval₂ f x = 0) :
f.IsIntegralElem (f p.leadingCoeff * x) := by
by_cases h' : 1 ≤ p.natDegree
· use normalizeScaleRoots p
have : p ≠ 0 := fun h'' => by
rw [h'', natDegree_zero] at h'
exact Nat.not_succ_le_zero 0 h'
use normalizeScaleRoots_monic p this
rw [normalizeScaleRoots_eval₂_leadingCoeff_mul p h' f x, h, mul_zero]
· by_cases hp : p.map f = 0
· apply_fun fun q => coeff q p.natDegree at hp
rw [coeff_map, coeff_zero, coeff_natDegree] at hp
rw [hp, zero_mul]
exact f.isIntegralElem_zero
· rw [Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, Classical.not_not] at h'
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero h', eval₂_C] at h
suffices p.map f = 0 by exact (hp this).elim
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero h', map_C, h, C_eq_zero]
#align ring_hom.is_integral_elem_leading_coeff_mul RingHom.isIntegralElem_leadingCoeff_mul
/-- Given a `p : R[X]` and a root `x : S`,
then `p.leadingCoeff • x : S` is integral over `R`. -/
theorem isIntegral_leadingCoeff_smul [Algebra R S] (h : aeval x p = 0) :
IsIntegral R (p.leadingCoeff • x) := by
rw [aeval_def] at h
rw [Algebra.smul_def]
exact (algebraMap R S).isIntegralElem_leadingCoeff_mul p x h
#align is_integral_leading_coeff_smul isIntegral_leadingCoeff_smul
end
end
section IsIntegralClosure
/-- `IsIntegralClosure A R B` is the characteristic predicate stating `A` is
the integral closure of `R` in `B`,
i.e. that an element of `B` is integral over `R` iff it is an element of (the image of) `A`.
-/
class IsIntegralClosure (A R B : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommSemiring A] [CommRing B] [Algebra R B]
[Algebra A B] : Prop where
algebraMap_injective' : Function.Injective (algebraMap A B)
isIntegral_iff : ∀ {x : B}, IsIntegral R x ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap A B y = x
#align is_integral_closure IsIntegralClosure
instance integralClosure.isIntegralClosure (R A : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] :
IsIntegralClosure (integralClosure R A) R A where
algebraMap_injective' := Subtype.coe_injective
isIntegral_iff {x} := ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩, by rintro ⟨⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩; exact h⟩
#align integral_closure.is_integral_closure integralClosure.isIntegralClosure
namespace IsIntegralClosure
-- Porting note: added to work around missing infer kind support
theorem algebraMap_injective (A R B : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommSemiring A] [CommRing B]
[Algebra R B] [Algebra A B] [IsIntegralClosure A R B] : Function.Injective (algebraMap A B) :=
algebraMap_injective' R
variable {R A B : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [CommRing B]
variable [Algebra R B] [Algebra A B] [IsIntegralClosure A R B]
variable (R B)
protected theorem isIntegral [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R A B] (x : A) : IsIntegral R x :=
(isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap_injective A R B)).mp <|
show IsIntegral R (algebraMap A B x) from isIntegral_iff.mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align is_integral_closure.is_integral IsIntegralClosure.isIntegral
theorem isIntegral_algebra [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R A B] : Algebra.IsIntegral R A :=
⟨fun x => IsIntegralClosure.isIntegral R B x⟩
#align is_integral_closure.is_integral_algebra IsIntegralClosure.isIntegral_algebra
theorem noZeroSMulDivisors [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R A B] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R B] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors R A := by
refine
Function.Injective.noZeroSMulDivisors _ (IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_injective A R B)
(map_zero _) fun _ _ => ?_
simp only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, IsScalarTower.smul_assoc]
#align is_integral_closure.no_zero_smul_divisors IsIntegralClosure.noZeroSMulDivisors
variable {R} (A) {B}
/-- If `x : B` is integral over `R`, then it is an element of the integral closure of `R` in `B`. -/
noncomputable def mk' (x : B) (hx : IsIntegral R x) : A :=
Classical.choose (isIntegral_iff.mp hx)
#align is_integral_closure.mk' IsIntegralClosure.mk'
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_mk' (x : B) (hx : IsIntegral R x) : algebraMap A B (mk' A x hx) = x :=
Classical.choose_spec (isIntegral_iff.mp hx)
#align is_integral_closure.algebra_map_mk' IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_one (h : IsIntegral R (1 : B) := isIntegral_one) : mk' A 1 h = 1 :=
algebraMap_injective A R B <| by rw [algebraMap_mk', RingHom.map_one]
#align is_integral_closure.mk'_one IsIntegralClosure.mk'_one
@[simp]
theorem mk'_zero (h : IsIntegral R (0 : B) := isIntegral_zero) : mk' A 0 h = 0 :=
algebraMap_injective A R B <| by rw [algebraMap_mk', RingHom.map_zero]
#align is_integral_closure.mk'_zero IsIntegralClosure.mk'_zero
-- Porting note: Left-hand side does not simplify @[simp]
theorem mk'_add (x y : B) (hx : IsIntegral R x) (hy : IsIntegral R y) :
mk' A (x + y) (hx.add hy) = mk' A x hx + mk' A y hy :=
algebraMap_injective A R B <| by simp only [algebraMap_mk', RingHom.map_add]
#align is_integral_closure.mk'_add IsIntegralClosure.mk'_add
-- Porting note: Left-hand side does not simplify @[simp]
theorem mk'_mul (x y : B) (hx : IsIntegral R x) (hy : IsIntegral R y) :
mk' A (x * y) (hx.mul hy) = mk' A x hx * mk' A y hy :=
algebraMap_injective A R B <| by simp only [algebraMap_mk', RingHom.map_mul]
#align is_integral_closure.mk'_mul IsIntegralClosure.mk'_mul
@[simp]
theorem mk'_algebraMap [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R A B] (x : R)
(h : IsIntegral R (algebraMap R B x) := isIntegral_algebraMap) :
IsIntegralClosure.mk' A (algebraMap R B x) h = algebraMap R A x :=
algebraMap_injective A R B <| by rw [algebraMap_mk', ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
#align is_integral_closure.mk'_algebra_map IsIntegralClosure.mk'_algebraMap
section lift
variable (B) {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
-- split from above, since otherwise it does not synthesize `Semiring S`
variable [Algebra S B] [IsScalarTower R S B]
variable [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R A B] [isIntegral : Algebra.IsIntegral R S]
variable (R)
/-- If `B / S / R` is a tower of ring extensions where `S` is integral over `R`,
then `S` maps (uniquely) into an integral closure `B / A / R`. -/
noncomputable def lift : S →ₐ[R] A where
toFun x := mk' A (algebraMap S B x) (IsIntegral.algebraMap
(Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (R := R) x))
map_one' := by simp only [RingHom.map_one, mk'_one]
map_zero' := by simp only [RingHom.map_zero, mk'_zero]
map_add' x y := by simp_rw [← mk'_add, map_add]
map_mul' x y := by simp_rw [← mk'_mul, RingHom.map_mul]
commutes' x := by simp_rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, mk'_algebraMap]
#align is_integral_closure.lift IsIntegralClosure.lift
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_lift (x : S) : algebraMap A B (lift R A B x) = algebraMap S B x :=
algebraMap_mk' A (algebraMap S B x) (IsIntegral.algebraMap
(Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (R := R) x))
#align is_integral_closure.algebra_map_lift IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift
end lift
section Equiv
variable (R B) (A' : Type*) [CommRing A']
variable [Algebra A' B] [IsIntegralClosure A' R B]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R A'] [IsScalarTower R A B] [IsScalarTower R A' B]
/-- Integral closures are all isomorphic to each other. -/
noncomputable def equiv : A ≃ₐ[R] A' :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom
(lift _ B (isIntegral := isIntegral_algebra R B))
(lift _ B (isIntegral := isIntegral_algebra R B))
(by ext x; apply algebraMap_injective A' R B; simp)
(by ext x; apply algebraMap_injective A R B; simp)
#align is_integral_closure.equiv IsIntegralClosure.equiv
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_equiv (x : A) : algebraMap A' B (equiv R A B A' x) = algebraMap A B x :=
algebraMap_lift A' B (isIntegral := isIntegral_algebra R B) x
#align is_integral_closure.algebra_map_equiv IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_equiv
end Equiv
end IsIntegralClosure
end IsIntegralClosure
section Algebra
open Algebra
variable {R A B S T : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Ring B] [CommRing S] [CommRing T]
variable [Algebra A B] [Algebra R B] (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T)
variable [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R A B]
/-- If A is an R-algebra all of whose elements are integral over R,
and x is an element of an A-algebra that is integral over A, then x is integral over R. -/
theorem isIntegral_trans [Algebra.IsIntegral R A] (x : B) (hx : IsIntegral A x) :
IsIntegral R x := by
rcases hx with ⟨p, pmonic, hp⟩
let S := adjoin R (p.coeffs : Set A)
have : Module.Finite R S := ⟨(Subalgebra.toSubmodule S).fg_top.mpr <|
fg_adjoin_of_finite p.coeffs.finite_toSet fun a _ ↦ Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral a⟩
let p' : S[X] := p.toSubring S.toSubring subset_adjoin
have hSx : IsIntegral S x := ⟨p', (p.monic_toSubring _ _).mpr pmonic, by
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq S A B, ← eval₂_map]
convert hp; apply p.map_toSubring S.toSubring⟩
let Sx := Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin S {x})
let MSx : Module S Sx := SMulMemClass.toModule _ -- the next line times out without this
have : Module.Finite S Sx := ⟨(Submodule.fg_top _).mpr hSx.fg_adjoin_singleton⟩
refine .of_mem_of_fg ((adjoin S {x}).restrictScalars R) ?_ _
((Subalgebra.mem_restrictScalars R).mpr <| subset_adjoin rfl)
rw [← Submodule.fg_top, ← Module.finite_def]
letI : SMul S Sx := { MSx with } -- need this even though MSx is there
have : IsScalarTower R S Sx :=
Submodule.isScalarTower Sx -- Lean looks for `Module A Sx` without this
exact Module.Finite.trans S Sx
#align is_integral_trans isIntegral_trans
#noalign is_integral_trans_aux
variable (A) in
/-- If A is an R-algebra all of whose elements are integral over R,
and B is an A-algebra all of whose elements are integral over A,
then all elements of B are integral over R. -/
protected theorem Algebra.IsIntegral.trans
[Algebra.IsIntegral R A] [Algebra.IsIntegral A B] : Algebra.IsIntegral R B :=
⟨fun x ↦ isIntegral_trans x (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (R := A) x)⟩
#align algebra.is_integral_trans Algebra.IsIntegral.trans
protected theorem RingHom.IsIntegral.trans
(hf : f.IsIntegral) (hg : g.IsIntegral) : (g.comp f).IsIntegral :=
let _ := f.toAlgebra; let _ := g.toAlgebra; let _ := (g.comp f).toAlgebra
have : IsScalarTower R S T := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq fun _ ↦ rfl
have : Algebra.IsIntegral R S := ⟨hf⟩
have : Algebra.IsIntegral S T := ⟨hg⟩
have : Algebra.IsIntegral R T := Algebra.IsIntegral.trans S
Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral
#align ring_hom.is_integral_trans RingHom.IsIntegral.trans
/-- If `R → A → B` is an algebra tower, `C` is the integral closure of `R` in `B`
and `A` is integral over `R`, then `C` is the integral closure of `A` in `B`. -/
lemma IsIntegralClosure.tower_top {B C : Type*} [CommRing C] [CommRing B]
[Algebra R B] [Algebra A B] [Algebra C B] [IsScalarTower R A B]
[IsIntegralClosure C R B] [Algebra.IsIntegral R A] :
IsIntegralClosure C A B :=
⟨IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_injective _ R _,
fun hx => (IsIntegralClosure.isIntegral_iff).mp (isIntegral_trans (R := R) _ hx),
fun hx => ((IsIntegralClosure.isIntegral_iff (R := R)).mpr hx).tower_top⟩
theorem RingHom.isIntegral_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : f.IsIntegral :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).recOn fun _y hy ↦ hy ▸ f.isIntegralElem_map
#align ring_hom.is_integral_of_surjective RingHom.isIntegral_of_surjective
theorem Algebra.isIntegral_of_surjective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R A)) :
Algebra.IsIntegral R A :=
⟨(algebraMap R A).isIntegral_of_surjective h⟩
#align is_integral_of_surjective Algebra.isIntegral_of_surjective
/-- If `R → A → B` is an algebra tower with `A → B` injective,
then if the entire tower is an integral extension so is `R → A` -/
theorem IsIntegral.tower_bot (H : Function.Injective (algebraMap A B)) {x : A}
(h : IsIntegral R (algebraMap A B x)) : IsIntegral R x :=
(isIntegral_algHom_iff (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A B) H).mp h
#align is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral IsIntegral.tower_bot
nonrec theorem RingHom.IsIntegral.tower_bot (hg : Function.Injective g)
(hfg : (g.comp f).IsIntegral) : f.IsIntegral :=
letI := f.toAlgebra; letI := g.toAlgebra; letI := (g.comp f).toAlgebra
haveI : IsScalarTower R S T := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq fun _ ↦ rfl
fun x ↦ IsIntegral.tower_bot hg (hfg (g x))
#align ring_hom.is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral RingHom.IsIntegral.tower_bot
theorem IsIntegral.tower_bot_of_field {R A B : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field A]
[CommRing B] [Nontrivial B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra A B] [Algebra R B] [IsScalarTower R A B]
{x : A} (h : IsIntegral R (algebraMap A B x)) : IsIntegral R x :=
h.tower_bot (algebraMap A B).injective
#align is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral_field IsIntegral.tower_bot_of_field
theorem RingHom.isIntegralElem.of_comp {x : T} (h : (g.comp f).IsIntegralElem x) :
g.IsIntegralElem x :=
let ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := h
⟨p.map f, hp.map f, by rwa [← eval₂_map] at hp'⟩
#align ring_hom.is_integral_elem_of_is_integral_elem_comp RingHom.isIntegralElem.of_comp
theorem RingHom.IsIntegral.tower_top (h : (g.comp f).IsIntegral) : g.IsIntegral :=
fun x ↦ RingHom.isIntegralElem.of_comp f g (h x)
#align ring_hom.is_integral_tower_top_of_is_integral RingHom.IsIntegral.tower_top
| Mathlib/RingTheory/IntegralClosure.lean | 953 | 958 | theorem RingHom.IsIntegral.quotient {I : Ideal S} (hf : f.IsIntegral) :
(Ideal.quotientMap I f le_rfl).IsIntegral := by |
rintro ⟨x⟩
obtain ⟨p, p_monic, hpx⟩ := hf x
refine ⟨p.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk _), p_monic.map _, ?_⟩
simpa only [hom_eval₂, eval₂_map] using congr_arg (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) hpx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulhwi Cha. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bulhwi Cha, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.Char
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.String.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Misc
import Batteries.Tactic.SeqFocus
namespace String
attribute [ext] ext
theorem lt_trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : String} : s₁ < s₂ → s₂ < s₃ → s₁ < s₃ :=
List.lt_trans' (α := Char) Nat.lt_trans
(fun h1 h2 => Nat.not_lt.2 <| Nat.le_trans (Nat.not_lt.1 h2) (Nat.not_lt.1 h1))
theorem lt_antisymm {s₁ s₂ : String} (h₁ : ¬s₁ < s₂) (h₂ : ¬s₂ < s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext <| List.lt_antisymm' (α := Char)
(fun h1 h2 => Char.le_antisymm (Nat.not_lt.1 h2) (Nat.not_lt.1 h1)) h₁ h₂
instance : Batteries.TransOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq
String.lt_irrefl String.lt_trans String.lt_antisymm
instance : Batteries.LTOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq
String.lt_irrefl String.lt_trans String.lt_antisymm
instance : Batteries.BEqOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq String.lt_irrefl
@[simp] theorem mk_length (s : List Char) : (String.mk s).length = s.length := rfl
attribute [simp] toList -- prefer `String.data` over `String.toList` in lemmas
private theorem add_csize_pos : 0 < i + csize c :=
Nat.add_pos_right _ (csize_pos c)
private theorem ne_add_csize_add_self : i ≠ n + csize c + i :=
Nat.ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left add_csize_pos)
private theorem ne_self_add_add_csize : i ≠ i + (n + csize c) :=
Nat.ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right add_csize_pos)
/-- The UTF-8 byte length of a list of characters. (This is intended for specification purposes.) -/
@[inline] def utf8Len : List Char → Nat := utf8ByteSize.go
@[simp] theorem utf8ByteSize.go_eq : utf8ByteSize.go = utf8Len := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8ByteSize_mk (cs) : utf8ByteSize ⟨cs⟩ = utf8Len cs := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_nil : utf8Len [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_cons (c cs) : utf8Len (c :: cs) = utf8Len cs + csize c := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_append (cs₁ cs₂) : utf8Len (cs₁ ++ cs₂) = utf8Len cs₁ + utf8Len cs₂ := by
induction cs₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.add_right_comm]
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_reverseAux (cs₁ cs₂) :
utf8Len (cs₁.reverseAux cs₂) = utf8Len cs₁ + utf8Len cs₂ := by
induction cs₁ generalizing cs₂ <;> simp [*, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm]
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_reverse (cs) : utf8Len cs.reverse = utf8Len cs := utf8Len_reverseAux ..
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_eq_zero : utf8Len l = 0 ↔ l = [] := by
cases l <;> simp [Nat.ne_of_gt add_csize_pos]
section
open List
theorem utf8Len_le_of_sublist : ∀ {cs₁ cs₂}, cs₁ <+ cs₂ → utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂
| _, _, .slnil => Nat.le_refl _
| _, _, .cons _ h => Nat.le_trans (utf8Len_le_of_sublist h) (Nat.le_add_right ..)
| _, _, .cons₂ _ h => Nat.add_le_add_right (utf8Len_le_of_sublist h) _
theorem utf8Len_le_of_infix (h : cs₁ <:+: cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
theorem utf8Len_le_of_suffix (h : cs₁ <:+ cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
theorem utf8Len_le_of_prefix (h : cs₁ <+: cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
end
@[simp] theorem endPos_eq (cs : List Char) : endPos ⟨cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ := rfl
namespace Pos
attribute [ext] ext
theorem lt_addChar (p : Pos) (c : Char) : p < p + c := Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (csize_pos _)
private theorem zero_ne_addChar {i : Pos} {c : Char} : 0 ≠ i + c :=
ne_of_lt add_csize_pos
/-- A string position is valid if it is equal to the UTF-8 length of an initial substring of `s`. -/
def Valid (s : String) (p : Pos) : Prop :=
∃ cs cs', cs ++ cs' = s.1 ∧ p.1 = utf8Len cs
@[simp] theorem valid_zero : Valid s 0 := ⟨[], s.1, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem valid_endPos : Valid s (endPos s) := ⟨s.1, [], by simp, rfl⟩
theorem Valid.mk (cs cs' : List Char) : Valid ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ := ⟨cs, cs', rfl, rfl⟩
theorem Valid.le_endPos : ∀ {s p}, Valid s p → p ≤ endPos s
| ⟨_⟩, ⟨_⟩, ⟨cs, cs', rfl, rfl⟩ => by simp [Nat.le_add_right]
end Pos
theorem endPos_eq_zero : ∀ (s : String), endPos s = 0 ↔ s = ""
| ⟨_⟩ => Pos.ext_iff.trans <| utf8Len_eq_zero.trans ext_iff.symm
theorem isEmpty_iff (s : String) : isEmpty s ↔ s = "" :=
(beq_iff_eq ..).trans (endPos_eq_zero _)
/--
Induction along the valid positions in a list of characters.
(This definition is intended only for specification purposes.)
-/
def utf8InductionOn {motive : List Char → Pos → Sort u}
(s : List Char) (i p : Pos)
(nil : ∀ i, motive [] i)
(eq : ∀ c cs, motive (c :: cs) p)
(ind : ∀ (c : Char) cs i, i ≠ p → motive cs (i + c) → motive (c :: cs) i) :
motive s i :=
match s with
| [] => nil i
| c::cs =>
if h : i = p then
h ▸ eq c cs
else ind c cs i h (utf8InductionOn cs (i + c) p nil eq ind)
theorem utf8GetAux_add_right_cancel (s : List Char) (i p n : Nat) :
utf8GetAux s ⟨i + n⟩ ⟨p + n⟩ = utf8GetAux s ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ := by
apply utf8InductionOn s ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ (motive := fun s i =>
utf8GetAux s ⟨i.byteIdx + n⟩ ⟨p + n⟩ = utf8GetAux s i ⟨p⟩) <;>
simp [utf8GetAux]
intro c cs ⟨i⟩ h ih
simp [Pos.ext_iff, Pos.addChar_eq] at h ⊢
simp [Nat.add_right_cancel_iff, h]
rw [Nat.add_right_comm]
exact ih
theorem utf8GetAux_addChar_right_cancel (s : List Char) (i p : Pos) (c : Char) :
utf8GetAux s (i + c) (p + c) = utf8GetAux s i p := utf8GetAux_add_right_cancel ..
theorem utf8GetAux_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) {i p : Nat} (hp : i + utf8Len cs = p) :
utf8GetAux (cs ++ cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = cs'.headD default := by
match cs, cs' with
| [], [] => rfl
| [], c::cs' => simp [← hp, utf8GetAux]
| c::cs, cs' =>
simp [utf8GetAux, -List.headD_eq_head?]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc => simp [← hp, Pos.ext_iff]; exact ne_self_add_add_csize
refine utf8GetAux_of_valid cs cs' ?_
simpa [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm] using hp
theorem get_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) : get ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = cs'.headD default :=
utf8GetAux_of_valid _ _ (Nat.zero_add _)
theorem get_cons_addChar (c : Char) (cs : List Char) (i : Pos) :
get ⟨c :: cs⟩ (i + c) = get ⟨cs⟩ i := by
simp [get, utf8GetAux, Pos.zero_ne_addChar, utf8GetAux_addChar_right_cancel]
theorem utf8GetAux?_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) {i p : Nat} (hp : i + utf8Len cs = p) :
utf8GetAux? (cs ++ cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = cs'.head? := by
match cs, cs' with
| [], [] => rfl
| [], c::cs' => simp [← hp, utf8GetAux?]
| c::cs, cs' =>
simp [utf8GetAux?]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc => simp [← hp, Pos.ext_iff]; exact ne_self_add_add_csize
refine utf8GetAux?_of_valid cs cs' ?_
simpa [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm] using hp
theorem get?_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) : get? ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = cs'.head? :=
utf8GetAux?_of_valid _ _ (Nat.zero_add _)
theorem utf8SetAux_of_valid (c' : Char) (cs cs' : List Char) {i p : Nat} (hp : i + utf8Len cs = p) :
utf8SetAux c' (cs ++ cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = cs ++ cs'.modifyHead fun _ => c' := by
match cs, cs' with
| [], [] => rfl
| [], c::cs' => simp [← hp, utf8SetAux]
| c::cs, cs' =>
simp [utf8SetAux]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc => simp [← hp, Pos.ext_iff]; exact ne_self_add_add_csize
refine congrArg (c::·) (utf8SetAux_of_valid c' cs cs' ?_)
simpa [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm] using hp
theorem set_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) (c' : Char) :
set ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ c' = ⟨cs ++ cs'.modifyHead fun _ => c'⟩ :=
ext (utf8SetAux_of_valid _ _ _ (Nat.zero_add _))
theorem modify_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) :
modify ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ f = ⟨cs ++ cs'.modifyHead f⟩ := by
rw [modify, set_of_valid, get_of_valid]; cases cs' <;> rfl
theorem next_of_valid' (cs cs' : List Char) :
next ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs + csize (cs'.headD default)⟩ := by
simp only [next, get_of_valid]; rfl
theorem next_of_valid (cs : List Char) (c : Char) (cs' : List Char) :
next ⟨cs ++ c :: cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs + csize c⟩ := next_of_valid' ..
@[simp] theorem atEnd_iff (s : String) (p : Pos) : atEnd s p ↔ s.endPos ≤ p :=
decide_eq_true_iff _
theorem valid_next {p : Pos} (h : p.Valid s) (h₂ : p < s.endPos) : (next s p).Valid s := by
match s, p, h with
| ⟨_⟩, ⟨_⟩, ⟨cs, [], rfl, rfl⟩ => simp at h₂
| ⟨_⟩, ⟨_⟩, ⟨cs, c::cs', rfl, rfl⟩ =>
rw [utf8ByteSize.go_eq, next_of_valid]
simpa using Pos.Valid.mk (cs ++ [c]) cs'
theorem utf8PrevAux_of_valid {cs cs' : List Char} {c : Char} {i p : Nat}
(hp : i + (utf8Len cs + csize c) = p) :
utf8PrevAux (cs ++ c :: cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = ⟨i + utf8Len cs⟩ := by
match cs with
| [] => simp [utf8PrevAux, ← hp, Pos.addChar_eq]
| c'::cs =>
simp [utf8PrevAux, Pos.addChar_eq, ← hp]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc =>
simp [Pos.ext_iff]; rw [Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.add_left_comm]; apply ne_add_csize_add_self
refine (utf8PrevAux_of_valid (by simp [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm])).trans ?_
simp [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
theorem prev_of_valid (cs : List Char) (c : Char) (cs' : List Char) :
prev ⟨cs ++ c :: cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs + csize c⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ := by
simp [prev]; refine (if_neg (Pos.ne_of_gt add_csize_pos)).trans ?_
rw [utf8PrevAux_of_valid] <;> simp
theorem prev_of_valid' (cs cs' : List Char) :
prev ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs.dropLast⟩ := by
match cs, cs.eq_nil_or_concat with
| _, .inl rfl => rfl
| _, .inr ⟨cs, c, rfl⟩ => simp [prev_of_valid]
theorem front_eq (s : String) : front s = s.1.headD default := by
unfold front; exact get_of_valid [] s.1
theorem back_eq (s : String) : back s = s.1.getLastD default := by
match s, s.1.eq_nil_or_concat with
| ⟨_⟩, .inl rfl => rfl
| ⟨_⟩, .inr ⟨cs, c, rfl⟩ => simp [back, prev_of_valid, get_of_valid]
theorem atEnd_of_valid (cs : List Char) (cs' : List Char) :
atEnd ⟨cs ++ cs'⟩ ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ ↔ cs' = [] := by
rw [atEnd_iff]
cases cs' <;> simp [Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right add_csize_pos]
unseal posOfAux findAux in
theorem posOfAux_eq (s c) : posOfAux s c = findAux s (· == c) := rfl
unseal posOfAux findAux in
theorem posOf_eq (s c) : posOf s c = find s (· == c) := rfl
unseal revPosOfAux revFindAux in
theorem revPosOfAux_eq (s c) : revPosOfAux s c = revFindAux s (· == c) := rfl
unseal revPosOfAux revFindAux in
theorem revPosOf_eq (s c) : revPosOf s c = revFind s (· == c) := rfl
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices] -- false positive from unfolding String.findAux
theorem findAux_of_valid (p) : ∀ l m r,
findAux ⟨l ++ m ++ r⟩ p ⟨utf8Len l + utf8Len m⟩ ⟨utf8Len l⟩ =
⟨utf8Len l + utf8Len (m.takeWhile (!p ·))⟩
| l, [], r => by unfold findAux List.takeWhile; simp
| l, c::m, r => by
unfold findAux List.takeWhile
rw [dif_pos (by exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right add_csize_pos)]
have h1 := get_of_valid l (c::m++r); have h2 := next_of_valid l c (m++r)
simp at h1 h2; simp [h1, h2]
cases p c <;> simp
have foo := findAux_of_valid p (l++[c]) m r; simp at foo
rw [Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.add_assoc] at foo
rw [foo, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem find_of_valid (p s) : find s p = ⟨utf8Len (s.1.takeWhile (!p ·))⟩ := by
simpa using findAux_of_valid p [] s.1 []
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices] -- false positive from unfolding String.revFindAux
theorem revFindAux_of_valid (p) : ∀ l r,
revFindAux ⟨l.reverse ++ r⟩ p ⟨utf8Len l⟩ = (l.dropWhile (!p ·)).tail?.map (⟨utf8Len ·⟩)
| [], r => by unfold revFindAux List.dropWhile; simp
| c::l, r => by
unfold revFindAux List.dropWhile
rw [dif_neg (by exact Pos.ne_of_gt add_csize_pos)]
have h1 := get_of_valid l.reverse (c::r); have h2 := prev_of_valid l.reverse c r
simp at h1 h2; simp [h1, h2]
cases p c <;> simp
exact revFindAux_of_valid p l (c::r)
theorem revFind_of_valid (p s) :
revFind s p = (s.1.reverse.dropWhile (!p ·)).tail?.map (⟨utf8Len ·⟩) := by
simpa using revFindAux_of_valid p s.1.reverse []
theorem firstDiffPos_loop_eq (l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ stop p)
(hl₁ : p = utf8Len l₁) (hl₂ : p = utf8Len l₂)
(hstop : stop = min (utf8Len l₁ + utf8Len r₁) (utf8Len l₂ + utf8Len r₂)) :
firstDiffPos.loop ⟨l₁ ++ r₁⟩ ⟨l₂ ++ r₂⟩ ⟨stop⟩ ⟨p⟩ =
⟨p + utf8Len (List.takeWhile₂ (· = ·) r₁ r₂).1⟩ := by
unfold List.takeWhile₂; split <;> unfold firstDiffPos.loop
· next a r₁ b r₂ =>
rw [
dif_pos <| by
rw [hstop, ← hl₁, ← hl₂]
refine Nat.lt_min.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right add_csize_pos,
show get ⟨l₁ ++ a :: r₁⟩ ⟨p⟩ = a by simp [hl₁, get_of_valid],
show get ⟨l₂ ++ b :: r₂⟩ ⟨p⟩ = b by simp [hl₂, get_of_valid]]
simp; split <;> simp
subst b
rw [show next ⟨l₁ ++ a :: r₁⟩ ⟨p⟩ = ⟨utf8Len l₁ + csize a⟩ by simp [hl₁, next_of_valid]]
simpa [← hl₁, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm] using
firstDiffPos_loop_eq (l₁ ++ [a]) (l₂ ++ [a]) r₁ r₂ stop (p + csize a)
(by simp [hl₁]) (by simp [hl₂]) (by simp [hstop, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm])
· next h =>
rw [dif_neg] <;> simp [hstop, ← hl₁, ← hl₂, -Nat.not_lt, Nat.lt_min]
intro h₁ h₂
have : ∀ {cs}, p < p + utf8Len cs → cs ≠ [] := by rintro _ h rfl; simp at h
obtain ⟨a, as, e₁⟩ := List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil (this h₁)
obtain ⟨b, bs, e₂⟩ := List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil (this h₂)
exact h _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂
theorem firstDiffPos_eq (a b : String) :
firstDiffPos a b = ⟨utf8Len (List.takeWhile₂ (· = ·) a.1 b.1).1⟩ := by
simpa [firstDiffPos] using
firstDiffPos_loop_eq [] [] a.1 b.1 ((utf8Len a.1).min (utf8Len b.1)) 0 rfl rfl (by simp)
theorem extract.go₂_add_right_cancel (s : List Char) (i e n : Nat) :
go₂ s ⟨i + n⟩ ⟨e + n⟩ = go₂ s ⟨i⟩ ⟨e⟩ := by
apply utf8InductionOn s ⟨i⟩ ⟨e⟩ (motive := fun s i =>
go₂ s ⟨i.byteIdx + n⟩ ⟨e + n⟩ = go₂ s i ⟨e⟩) <;> simp [go₂]
intro c cs ⟨i⟩ h ih
simp [Pos.ext_iff, Pos.addChar_eq] at h ⊢
simp [Nat.add_right_cancel_iff, h]
rw [Nat.add_right_comm]
exact ih
theorem extract.go₂_append_left : ∀ (s t : List Char) (i e : Nat),
e = utf8Len s + i → go₂ (s ++ t) ⟨i⟩ ⟨e⟩ = s
| [], t, i, _, rfl => by cases t <;> simp [go₂]
| c :: cs, t, i, _, rfl => by
simp [go₂, Pos.ext_iff, ne_add_csize_add_self, Pos.addChar_eq]
apply go₂_append_left; rw [Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/String/Lemmas.lean | 347 | 358 | theorem extract.go₁_add_right_cancel (s : List Char) (i b e n : Nat) :
go₁ s ⟨i + n⟩ ⟨b + n⟩ ⟨e + n⟩ = go₁ s ⟨i⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨e⟩ := by |
apply utf8InductionOn s ⟨i⟩ ⟨b⟩ (motive := fun s i =>
go₁ s ⟨i.byteIdx + n⟩ ⟨b + n⟩ ⟨e + n⟩ = go₁ s i ⟨b⟩ ⟨e⟩) <;>
simp [go₁]
· intro c cs
apply go₂_add_right_cancel
· intro c cs ⟨i⟩ h ih
simp [Pos.ext_iff, Pos.addChar_eq] at h ih ⊢
simp [Nat.add_right_cancel_iff, h]
rw [Nat.add_right_comm]
exact ih
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Instances
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.list.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists Set.range
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
-- Porting note: Delete this attribute
-- attribute [inline] List.head!
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
#align list.unique_of_is_empty List.uniqueOfIsEmpty
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
#align list.cons_ne_nil List.cons_ne_nil
#align list.cons_ne_self List.cons_ne_self
#align list.head_eq_of_cons_eq List.head_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
#align list.tail_eq_of_cons_eq List.tail_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
#align list.cons_injective List.cons_injective
#align list.cons_inj List.cons_inj
#align list.cons_eq_cons List.cons_eq_cons
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
#align list.singleton_injective List.singleton_injective
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align list.singleton_inj List.singleton_inj
#align list.exists_cons_of_ne_nil List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
#align list.set_of_mem_cons List.set_of_mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
#align list.mem_singleton_self List.mem_singleton_self
#align list.eq_of_mem_singleton List.eq_of_mem_singleton
#align list.mem_singleton List.mem_singleton
#align list.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem List.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
#align decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.not_mem_append List.not_mem_append
#align list.ne_nil_of_mem List.ne_nil_of_mem
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias mem_split := append_of_mem
#align list.mem_split List.append_of_mem
#align list.mem_of_ne_of_mem List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
#align list.ne_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem List.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem
#align list.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.mem_map List.mem_map
#align list.exists_of_mem_map List.exists_of_mem_map
#align list.mem_map_of_mem List.mem_map_of_memₓ -- implicits order
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
#align list.mem_map_of_injective List.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
#align function.involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
#align list.mem_map_of_involutive List.mem_map_of_involutive
#align list.forall_mem_map_iff List.forall_mem_map_iffₓ -- universe order
#align list.map_eq_nil List.map_eq_nilₓ -- universe order
attribute [simp] List.mem_join
#align list.mem_join List.mem_join
#align list.exists_of_mem_join List.exists_of_mem_join
#align list.mem_join_of_mem List.mem_join_of_memₓ -- implicits order
attribute [simp] List.mem_bind
#align list.mem_bind List.mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3, And in Lean4
#align list.exists_of_mem_bind List.exists_of_mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
#align list.mem_bind_of_mem List.mem_bind_of_memₓ -- implicits order
#align list.bind_map List.bind_mapₓ -- implicits order
theorem map_bind (g : β → List γ) (f : α → β) :
∀ l : List α, (List.map f l).bind g = l.bind fun a => g (f a)
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by simp only [cons_bind, map_cons, map_bind _ _ l]
#align list.map_bind List.map_bind
/-! ### length -/
#align list.length_eq_zero List.length_eq_zero
#align list.length_singleton List.length_singleton
#align list.length_pos_of_mem List.length_pos_of_mem
#align list.exists_mem_of_length_pos List.exists_mem_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_iff_exists_mem List.length_pos_iff_exists_mem
alias ⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos
#align list.ne_nil_of_length_pos List.ne_nil_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_of_ne_nil List.length_pos_of_ne_nil
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
#align list.length_pos_iff_ne_nil List.length_pos_iff_ne_nil
#align list.exists_mem_of_ne_nil List.exists_mem_of_ne_nil
#align list.length_eq_one List.length_eq_one
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
#align list.exists_of_length_succ List.exists_of_length_succ
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· apply ih; simpa using hl
#align list.length_injective_iff List.length_injective_iff
@[simp default+1] -- Porting note: this used to be just @[simp]
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
#align list.length_injective List.length_injective
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_two List.length_eq_two
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_three List.length_eq_three
#align list.sublist.length_le List.Sublist.length_le
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
#align list.has_singleton List.instSingletonList
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_emptyc_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg (not_mem_nil _) }
#align list.empty_eq List.empty_eq
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
#align list.singleton_eq List.singleton_eq
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
#align list.insert_neg List.insert_neg
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
#align list.insert_pos List.insert_pos
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
#align list.doubleton_eq List.doubleton_eq
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
#align list.forall_mem_nil List.forall_mem_nil
#align list.forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
#align list.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons
#align list.forall_mem_singleton List.forall_mem_singleton
#align list.forall_mem_append List.forall_mem_append
#align list.not_exists_mem_nil List.not_exists_mem_nilₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of List.exists_mem_cons_ofₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of_exists List.exists_mem_cons_of_existsₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
#align list.or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons List.or_exists_of_exists_mem_consₓ -- bExists change
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
#align list.exists_mem_cons_iff List.exists_mem_cons_iff
/-! ### list subset -/
instance : IsTrans (List α) Subset where
trans := fun _ _ _ => List.Subset.trans
#align list.subset_def List.subset_def
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_left List.subset_append_of_subset_left
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_right List.subset_append_of_subset_right
#align list.cons_subset List.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
#align list.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem List.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
#align list.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset List.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.append_subset_iff List.append_subset
alias ⟨eq_nil_of_subset_nil, _⟩ := subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_of_subset_nil List.eq_nil_of_subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem
#align list.map_subset List.map_subset
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
#align list.map_subset_iff List.map_subset_iff
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
#align list.append_eq_has_append List.append_eq_has_append
#align list.singleton_append List.singleton_append
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right
#align list.append_eq_nil List.append_eq_nil
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.nil_eq_append_iff List.nil_eq_append
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias append_eq_cons_iff := append_eq_cons
#align list.append_eq_cons_iff List.append_eq_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias cons_eq_append_iff := cons_eq_append
#align list.cons_eq_append_iff List.cons_eq_append
#align list.append_eq_append_iff List.append_eq_append_iff
#align list.take_append_drop List.take_append_drop
#align list.append_inj List.append_inj
#align list.append_inj_right List.append_inj_rightₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left List.append_inj_leftₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj' List.append_inj'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_right' List.append_inj_right'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left' List.append_inj_left'ₓ -- implicits order
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_left_cancel := append_cancel_left
#align list.append_left_cancel List.append_cancel_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_right_cancel := append_cancel_right
#align list.append_right_cancel List.append_cancel_right
@[simp] theorem append_left_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [← append_left_inj (s₁ := x), nil_append]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_left {x y : List α} : y = x ++ y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_left_eq_self]
@[simp] theorem append_right_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = x ↔ y = [] := by
rw [← append_right_inj (t₁ := y), append_nil]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_right {x y : List α} : x = x ++ y ↔ y = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_right_eq_self]
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
#align list.append_right_injective List.append_right_injective
#align list.append_right_inj List.append_right_inj
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
#align list.append_left_injective List.append_left_injective
#align list.append_left_inj List.append_left_inj
#align list.map_eq_append_split List.map_eq_append_split
/-! ### replicate -/
@[simp] lemma replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = [] := rfl
#align list.replicate_zero List.replicate_zero
attribute [simp] replicate_succ
#align list.replicate_succ List.replicate_succ
lemma replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = [a] := rfl
#align list.replicate_one List.replicate_one
#align list.length_replicate List.length_replicate
#align list.mem_replicate List.mem_replicate
#align list.eq_of_mem_replicate List.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length]
#align list.eq_replicate_length List.eq_replicate_length
#align list.eq_replicate_of_mem List.eq_replicate_of_mem
#align list.eq_replicate List.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
induction m <;> simp [*, succ_add, replicate]
#align list.replicate_add List.replicate_add
theorem replicate_succ' (n) (a : α) : replicate (n + 1) a = replicate n a ++ [a] :=
replicate_add n 1 a
#align list.replicate_succ' List.replicate_succ'
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
#align list.replicate_subset_singleton List.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
#align list.subset_singleton_iff List.subset_singleton_iff
@[simp] theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (n) (a : α) :
map f (replicate n a) = replicate n (f a) := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, map]]
#align list.map_replicate List.map_replicate
@[simp] theorem tail_replicate (a : α) (n) :
tail (replicate n a) = replicate (n - 1) a := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.tail_replicate List.tail_replicate
@[simp] theorem join_replicate_nil (n : ℕ) : join (replicate n []) = @nil α := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, join, append_nil]]
#align list.join_replicate_nil List.join_replicate_nil
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align list.replicate_right_injective List.replicate_right_injective
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_right_inj List.replicate_right_inj
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
#align list.replicate_right_inj' List.replicate_right_inj'
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate · a)
#align list.replicate_left_injective List.replicate_left_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_left_inj List.replicate_left_inj
@[simp] theorem head_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) (h) : head (replicate n a) h = a := by
cases n <;> simp at h ⊢
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
#align list.mem_pure List.mem_pure
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.bind f :=
rfl
#align list.bind_eq_bind List.bind_eq_bind
#align list.bind_append List.append_bind
/-! ### concat -/
#align list.concat_nil List.concat_nil
#align list.concat_cons List.concat_cons
#align list.concat_eq_append List.concat_eq_append
#align list.init_eq_of_concat_eq List.init_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.last_eq_of_concat_eq List.last_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.concat_ne_nil List.concat_ne_nil
#align list.concat_append List.concat_append
#align list.length_concat List.length_concat
#align list.append_concat List.append_concat
/-! ### reverse -/
#align list.reverse_nil List.reverse_nil
#align list.reverse_core List.reverseAux
-- Porting note: Do we need this?
attribute [local simp] reverseAux
#align list.reverse_cons List.reverse_cons
#align list.reverse_core_eq List.reverseAux_eq
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
#align list.reverse_cons' List.reverse_cons'
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
#align list.reverse_singleton List.reverse_singleton
#align list.reverse_append List.reverse_append
#align list.reverse_concat List.reverse_concat
#align list.reverse_reverse List.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
#align list.reverse_involutive List.reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
#align list.reverse_injective List.reverse_injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
#align list.reverse_surjective List.reverse_surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
#align list.reverse_bijective List.reverse_bijective
@[simp]
theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : List α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_inj List.reverse_inj
theorem reverse_eq_iff {l l' : List α} : l.reverse = l' ↔ l = l'.reverse :=
reverse_involutive.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_iff List.reverse_eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_nil List.reverse_eq_nil_iff
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
#align list.concat_eq_reverse_cons List.concat_eq_reverse_cons
#align list.length_reverse List.length_reverse
-- Porting note: This one was @[simp] in mathlib 3,
-- but Lean contains a competing simp lemma reverse_map.
-- For now we remove @[simp] to avoid simplification loops.
-- TODO: Change Lean lemma to match mathlib 3?
theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
(reverse_map f l).symm
#align list.map_reverse List.map_reverse
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
#align list.map_reverse_core List.map_reverseAux
#align list.mem_reverse List.mem_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_replicate (n) (a : α) : reverse (replicate n a) = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate.2
⟨by rw [length_reverse, length_replicate],
fun b h => eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
#align list.reverse_replicate List.reverse_replicate
/-! ### empty -/
-- Porting note: this does not work as desired
-- attribute [simp] List.isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_iff_eq_nil {l : List α} : l.isEmpty ↔ l = [] := by cases l <;> simp [isEmpty]
#align list.empty_iff_eq_nil List.isEmpty_iff_eq_nil
/-! ### dropLast -/
#align list.length_init List.length_dropLast
/-! ### getLast -/
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons {a : α} {l : List α} :
∀ h : l ≠ nil, getLast (a :: l) (cons_ne_nil a l) = getLast l h := by
induction l <;> intros
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.last_cons List.getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l _ (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp only [getLast_append]
#align list.last_append_singleton List.getLast_append_singleton
-- Porting note: name should be fixed upstream
theorem getLast_append' (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l₁ l₂ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction' l₁ with _ _ ih
· simp
· simp only [cons_append]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
exact ih
#align list.last_append List.getLast_append'
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (concat_ne_nil a l) = a :=
getLast_concat ..
#align list.last_concat List.getLast_concat'
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
#align list.last_singleton List.getLast_singleton'
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
#align list.last_cons_cons List.getLast_cons_cons
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [a], h => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
#align list.init_append_last List.dropLast_append_getLast
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
#align list.last_congr List.getLast_congr
#align list.last_mem List.getLast_mem
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ (length_replicate _ _)) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
#align list.last_replicate_succ List.getLast_replicate_succ
/-! ### getLast? -/
-- Porting note: Moved earlier in file, for use in subsequent lemmas.
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_cons_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) :
getLast? (a :: b :: l) = getLast? (b :: l) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isNone : ∀ {l : List α}, (getLast? l).isNone ↔ l = []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isNone (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_none List.getLast?_isNone
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isSome : ∀ {l : List α}, l.getLast?.isSome ↔ l ≠ []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isSome (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_some List.getLast?_isSome
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
#align list.mem_last'_eq_last List.mem_getLast?_eq_getLast
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
#align list.last'_eq_last_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
#align list.mem_last'_cons List.mem_getLast?_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_getLast? {l : List α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.getLast?) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := mem_getLast?_eq_getLast ha
h₂.symm ▸ getLast_mem _
#align list.mem_of_mem_last' List.mem_of_mem_getLast?
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
#align list.init_append_last' List.dropLast_append_getLast?
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [a] => rfl
| [a, b] => rfl
| [a, b, c] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
#align list.ilast_eq_last' List.getLastI_eq_getLast?
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], a, l₂ => rfl
| [b], a, l₂ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
#align list.last'_append_cons List.getLast?_append_cons
#align list.last'_cons_cons List.getLast?_cons_cons
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
#align list.last'_append_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem getLast?_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
#align list.last'_append List.getLast?_append
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head_eq_head' List.head!_eq_head?
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_head List.surjective_head!
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
#align list.surjective_head' List.surjective_head?
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_tail List.surjective_tail
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
#align list.eq_cons_of_mem_head' List.eq_cons_of_mem_head?
theorem mem_of_mem_head? {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l.head?) : x ∈ l :=
(eq_cons_of_mem_head? h).symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
#align list.mem_of_mem_head' List.mem_of_mem_head?
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
#align list.head_cons List.head!_cons
#align list.tail_nil List.tail_nil
#align list.tail_cons List.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.head_append List.head!_append
theorem head?_append {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) : x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
#align list.head'_append List.head?_append
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
#align list.head'_append_of_ne_nil List.head?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
#align list.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
#align list.cons_head'_tail List.cons_head?_tail
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| a :: l, _ => rfl
#align list.head_mem_head' List.head!_mem_head?
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
#align list.cons_head_tail List.cons_head!_tail
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' := mem_cons_self l.head! l.tail
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
#align list.head_mem_self List.head!_mem_self
theorem head_mem {l : List α} : ∀ (h : l ≠ nil), l.head h ∈ l := by
cases l <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head?_map (f : α → β) (l) : head? (map f l) = (head? l).map f := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head'_map List.head?_map
theorem tail_append_of_ne_nil (l l' : List α) (h : l ≠ []) : (l ++ l').tail = l.tail ++ l' := by
cases l
· contradiction
· simp
#align list.tail_append_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_of_ne_nil
#align list.nth_le_eq_iff List.get_eq_iff
theorem get_eq_get? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = (l.get? i).get (by simp [get?_eq_get]) := by
simp [get_eq_iff]
#align list.some_nth_le_eq List.get?_eq_get
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false -- TODO(Mario): make replacements for theorems in this section
/-- nth element of a list `l` given `n < l.length`. -/
@[deprecated get (since := "2023-01-05")]
def nthLe (l : List α) (n) (h : n < l.length) : α := get l ⟨n, h⟩
#align list.nth_le List.nthLe
@[simp] theorem nthLe_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.nthLe i h = l.nthLe (i + 1) h' := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
#align list.nth_le_tail List.nthLe_tail
theorem nthLe_cons_aux {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : n < (a :: l).length) :
n - 1 < l.length := by
contrapose! h
rw [length_cons]
omega
#align list.nth_le_cons_aux List.nthLe_cons_aux
theorem nthLe_cons {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hl) :
(a :: l).nthLe n hl = if hn : n = 0 then a else l.nthLe (n - 1) (nthLe_cons_aux hn hl) := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [nthLe, h]
cases l
· rw [length_singleton, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hl
omega
cases n
· contradiction
rfl
#align list.nth_le_cons List.nthLe_cons
end deprecated
-- Porting note: List.modifyHead has @[simp], and Lean 4 treats this as
-- an invitation to unfold modifyHead in any context,
-- not just use the equational lemmas.
-- @[simp]
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem modifyHead_modifyHead (l : List α) (f g : α → α) :
(l.modifyHead f).modifyHead g = l.modifyHead (g ∘ f) := by cases l <;> simp
#align list.modify_head_modify_head List.modifyHead_modifyHead
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def reverseRecOn {motive : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) : motive l :=
match h : reverse l with
| [] => cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
nil
| head :: tail =>
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
append_singleton _ head <| reverseRecOn (reverse tail) nil append_singleton
termination_by l.length
decreasing_by
simp_wf
rw [← length_reverse l, h, length_cons]
simp [Nat.lt_succ]
#align list.reverse_rec_on List.reverseRecOn
@[simp]
theorem reverseRecOn_nil {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn [] nil append_singleton = nil := reverseRecOn.eq_1 ..
-- `unusedHavesSuffices` is getting confused by the unfolding of `reverseRecOn`
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem reverseRecOn_concat {motive : List α → Sort*} (x : α) (xs : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
append_singleton _ _ (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) xs nil append_singleton) := by
suffices ∀ ys (h : reverse (reverse xs) = ys),
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
cast (by simp [(reverse_reverse _).symm.trans h])
(append_singleton _ x (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) ys nil append_singleton)) by
exact this _ (reverse_reverse xs)
intros ys hy
conv_lhs => unfold reverseRecOn
split
next h => simp at h
next heq =>
revert heq
simp only [reverse_append, reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, singleton_append, cons.injEq]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
subst ys
rfl
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def bidirectionalRec {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
∀ l, motive l
| [] => nil
| [a] => singleton a
| a :: b :: l =>
let l' := dropLast (b :: l)
let b' := getLast (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
cast (by rw [← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)]) <|
cons_append a l' b' (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l')
termination_by l => l.length
#align list.bidirectional_rec List.bidirectionalRecₓ -- universe order
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_nil {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [] = nil := bidirectionalRec.eq_1 ..
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_singleton {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) (a : α):
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [a] = singleton a := by
simp [bidirectionalRec]
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_cons_append {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b])))
(a : α) (l : List α) (b : α) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append (a :: (l ++ [b])) =
cons_append a l b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bidirectionalRec
cases l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs =>
simp only [List.cons_append]
dsimp only [← List.cons_append]
suffices ∀ (ys init : List α) (hinit : init = ys) (last : α) (hlast : last = b),
(cons_append a init last
(bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append init)) =
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simp [hinit, hlast])
(cons_append a ys b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append ys)) by
rw [this (x :: xs) _ (by rw [dropLast_append_cons, dropLast_single, append_nil]) _ (by simp)]
simp
rintro ys init rfl last rfl
rfl
/-- Like `bidirectionalRec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
abbrev bidirectionalRecOn {C : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ a : α, C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectionalRec H0 H1 Hn l
#align list.bidirectional_rec_on List.bidirectionalRecOn
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
#align list.nil_sublist List.nil_sublist
#align list.sublist.refl List.Sublist.refl
#align list.sublist.trans List.Sublist.trans
#align list.sublist_cons List.sublist_cons
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist List.sublist_of_cons_sublist
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
#align list.sublist.cons_cons List.Sublist.cons_cons
#align list.sublist_append_left List.sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist_append_right List.sublist_append_right
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
#align list.sublist_cons_of_sublist List.sublist_cons_of_sublist
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_left List.sublist_append_of_sublist_left
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_right List.sublist_append_of_sublist_right
theorem tail_sublist : ∀ l : List α, tail l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a::l => sublist_cons a l
#align list.tail_sublist List.tail_sublist
@[gcongr] protected theorem Sublist.tail : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → tail l₁ <+ tail l₂
| _, _, slnil => .slnil
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ h => (tail_sublist _).trans h
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ _ h => h
theorem Sublist.of_cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} {a b : α} (h : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.tail
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons List.Sublist.of_cons_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")]
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {a} (h : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ := h.of_cons_cons
attribute [simp] cons_sublist_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")] alias cons_sublist_cons_iff := cons_sublist_cons
#align list.cons_sublist_cons_iff List.cons_sublist_cons_iff
#align list.append_sublist_append_left List.append_sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist.append_right List.Sublist.append_right
#align list.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist List.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist
#align list.sublist.reverse List.Sublist.reverse
#align list.reverse_sublist_iff List.reverse_sublist
#align list.append_sublist_append_right List.append_sublist_append_right
#align list.sublist.append List.Sublist.append
#align list.sublist.subset List.Sublist.subset
#align list.singleton_sublist List.singleton_sublist
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : List α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil <| s.subset
#align list.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil List.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil
-- Porting note: this lemma seems to have been renamed on the occasion of its move to Batteries
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
#align list.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil List.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
#align list.replicate_sublist_replicate List.replicate_sublist_replicate
theorem sublist_replicate_iff {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ} :
l <+ replicate n a ↔ ∃ k ≤ n, l = replicate k a :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨l.length, h.length_le.trans_eq (length_replicate _ _),
eq_replicate_length.mpr fun b hb => eq_of_mem_replicate (h.subset hb)⟩,
by rintro ⟨k, h, rfl⟩; exact (replicate_sublist_replicate _).mpr h⟩
#align list.sublist_replicate_iff List.sublist_replicate_iff
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length List.Sublist.eq_of_length
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length_le List.Sublist.eq_of_length_le
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
#align list.sublist.antisymm List.Sublist.antisymm
instance decidableSublist [DecidableEq α] : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [], _ => isTrue <| nil_sublist _
| _ :: _, [] => isFalse fun h => List.noConfusion <| eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ =>
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist l₁ l₂) <| h ▸ cons_sublist_cons.symm
else
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist (a :: l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, fun s =>
match a, l₁, s, h with
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ s', h => s'
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ t _, h => absurd rfl h⟩
#align list.decidable_sublist List.decidableSublist
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
#align list.index_of_nil List.indexOf_nil
/-
Porting note: The following proofs were simpler prior to the port. These proofs use the low-level
`findIdx.go`.
* `indexOf_cons_self`
* `indexOf_cons_eq`
* `indexOf_cons_ne`
* `indexOf_cons`
The ported versions of the earlier proofs are given in comments.
-/
-- indexOf_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_self (a : α) (l : List α) : indexOf a (a :: l) = 0 := by
rw [indexOf, findIdx_cons, beq_self_eq_true, cond]
#align list.index_of_cons_self List.indexOf_cons_self
-- fun e => if_pos e
theorem indexOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → indexOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact indexOf_cons_self b l
#align list.index_of_cons_eq List.indexOf_cons_eq
-- fun n => if_neg n
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → indexOf a (b :: l) = succ (indexOf a l)
| h => by simp only [indexOf, findIdx_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, h, ite_false]
#align list.index_of_cons_ne List.indexOf_cons_ne
#align list.index_of_cons List.indexOf_cons
theorem indexOf_eq_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction' l with b l ih
· exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _)
simp only [length, mem_cons, indexOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or_iff]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj'
#align list.index_of_eq_length List.indexOf_eq_length
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → indexOf a l = length l :=
indexOf_eq_length.2
#align list.index_of_of_not_mem List.indexOf_of_not_mem
theorem indexOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction' l with b l ih; · rfl
simp only [length, indexOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
#align list.index_of_le_length List.indexOf_le_length
theorem indexOf_lt_length {a} {l : List α} : indexOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.by_contradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| indexOf_eq_length.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne indexOf_le_length) fun h => indexOf_eq_length.1 h al⟩
#align list.index_of_lt_length List.indexOf_lt_length
theorem indexOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = indexOf a l₁ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· exfalso
exact not_mem_nil a h
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [indexOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
#align list.index_of_append_of_mem List.indexOf_append_of_mem
theorem indexOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + indexOf a l₂ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
rw [List.cons_append, indexOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
#align list.index_of_append_of_not_mem List.indexOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated get_of_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := get_of_mem h; ⟨i.1, i.2, h⟩
#align list.nth_le_of_mem List.nthLe_of_mem
@[deprecated get?_eq_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_get? {l : List α} {n} (h) : get? l n = some (nthLe l n h) := get?_eq_get _
#align list.nth_le_nth List.nthLe_get?
#align list.nth_len_le List.get?_len_le
@[simp]
theorem get?_length (l : List α) : l.get? l.length = none := get?_len_le le_rfl
#align list.nth_length List.get?_length
#align list.nth_eq_some List.get?_eq_some
#align list.nth_eq_none_iff List.get?_eq_none
#align list.nth_of_mem List.get?_of_mem
@[deprecated get_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_mem (l : List α) (n h) : nthLe l n h ∈ l := get_mem ..
#align list.nth_le_mem List.nthLe_mem
#align list.nth_mem List.get?_mem
@[deprecated mem_iff_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem mem_iff_nthLe {a} {l : List α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
mem_iff_get.trans ⟨fun ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩ => ⟨n, h, e⟩, fun ⟨n, h, e⟩ => ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩⟩
#align list.mem_iff_nth_le List.mem_iff_nthLe
#align list.mem_iff_nth List.mem_iff_get?
#align list.nth_zero List.get?_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-03")] alias get?_injective := get?_inj
#align list.nth_injective List.get?_inj
#align list.nth_map List.get?_map
@[deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nthLe (map f l) n H1 = f (nthLe l n H2) := get_map ..
#align list.nth_le_map List.nthLe_map
/-- A version of `get_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem get_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} :
f (get l n) = get (map f l) ⟨n.1, (l.length_map f).symm ▸ n.2⟩ := Eq.symm (get_map _)
/-- A version of `nthLe_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
@[deprecated get_map_rev (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nthLe l n H) = nthLe (map f l) n ((l.length_map f).symm ▸ H) :=
(nthLe_map f _ _).symm
#align list.nth_le_map_rev List.nthLe_map_rev
@[simp, deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nthLe (map f l) n H = f (nthLe l n (l.length_map f ▸ H)) := nthLe_map f _ _
#align list.nth_le_map' List.nthLe_map'
#align list.nth_le_of_eq List.get_of_eq
@[simp, deprecated get_singleton (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) : nthLe [a] n hn = a := get_singleton ..
#align list.nth_le_singleton List.get_singleton
#align list.nth_le_zero List.get_mk_zero
#align list.nth_le_append List.get_append
@[deprecated get_append_right' (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_append_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nthLe n h₂ = l₂.nthLe (n - l₁.length) (get_append_right_aux h₁ h₂) :=
get_append_right' h₁ h₂
#align list.nth_le_append_right_aux List.get_append_right_aux
#align list.nth_le_append_right List.nthLe_append_right
#align list.nth_le_replicate List.get_replicate
#align list.nth_append List.get?_append
#align list.nth_append_right List.get?_append_right
#align list.last_eq_nth_le List.getLast_eq_get
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_get l _).symm
#align list.nth_le_length_sub_one List.get_length_sub_one
#align list.nth_concat_length List.get?_concat_length
@[deprecated get_cons_length (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_cons_length : ∀ (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : ℕ) (h : n = xs.length),
(x :: xs).nthLe n (by simp [h]) = (x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs) := get_cons_length
#align list.nth_le_cons_length List.nthLe_cons_length
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_get_cons h, take, take]
#align list.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length List.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length
#align list.ext List.ext
-- TODO one may rename ext in the standard library, and it is also not clear
-- which of ext_get?, ext_get?', ext_get should be @[ext], if any
alias ext_get? := ext
theorem ext_get?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, get?_eq_none.mpr]
theorem ext_get?_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔ ∀ n, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _; rfl, ext_get?⟩
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_get?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_get?'⟩
@[deprecated ext_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem ext_nthLe {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀ n h₁ h₂, nthLe l₁ n h₁ = nthLe l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_get hl h
#align list.ext_le List.ext_nthLe
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h), get l ⟨indexOf a l, h⟩ = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, indexOf_cons, get, @indexOf_get _ _ l, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
#align list.index_of_nth_le List.indexOf_get
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get? [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
get? l (indexOf a l) = some a := by rw [get?_eq_get, indexOf_get (indexOf_lt_length.2 h)]
#align list.index_of_nth List.indexOf_get?
@[deprecated (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem get_reverse_aux₁ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i h1 h2), get (reverseAux l r) ⟨i + length l, h1⟩ = get r ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i => fun h1 _ => rfl
| a :: l, r, i => by
rw [show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l from Nat.add_right_comm i (length l) 1]
exact fun h1 h2 => get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) (i + 1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux1 List.get_reverse_aux₁
theorem indexOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
indexOf x l = indexOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨indexOf x l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨indexOf y l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [indexOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
#align list.index_of_inj List.indexOf_inj
theorem get_reverse_aux₂ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i : Nat) (h1) (h2),
get (reverseAux l r) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i, h1, h2 => absurd h2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| a :: l, r, 0, h1, _ => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) 0
rw [Nat.zero_add] at aux
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
| a :: l, r, i + 1, h1, h2 => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₂ l (a :: r) i
have heq : length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1) = length l - 1 - i := by rw [length]; omega
rw [← heq] at aux
apply aux
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux2 List.get_reverse_aux₂
@[simp] theorem get_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
get (reverse l) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩ :=
get_reverse_aux₂ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp, deprecated get_reverse (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
nthLe (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nthLe l i h2 :=
get_reverse ..
#align list.nth_le_reverse List.nthLe_reverse
theorem nthLe_reverse' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.reverse.length) (hn') :
l.reverse.nthLe n hn = l.nthLe (l.length - 1 - n) hn' := by
rw [eq_comm]
convert nthLe_reverse l.reverse n (by simpa) hn using 1
simp
#align list.nth_le_reverse' List.nthLe_reverse'
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := nthLe_reverse' ..
-- FIXME: prove it the other way around
attribute [deprecated get_reverse' (since := "2023-01-05")] nthLe_reverse'
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nthLe 0 (by omega)] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp only [get_singleton]
congr
omega
#align list.eq_cons_of_length_one List.eq_cons_of_length_one
end deprecated
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail {f g : List α → List α} (m : ℕ) :
∀ (n) (l : List α),
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g (m + n) =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g m) n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, a :: l => congr_arg (List.cons a) (modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail m n l)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le {f g : List α → List α} (m n : ℕ) (l : List α)
(h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g m =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g (m - n)) n := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.add_comm, modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same {f g : List α → List α} (n : ℕ) (l : List α) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g n = l.modifyNthTail (g ∘ f) n := by
rw [modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le n n l (le_refl n), Nat.sub_self]; rfl
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same
#align list.modify_nth_tail_id List.modifyNthTail_id
#align list.remove_nth_eq_nth_tail List.eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
#align list.update_nth_eq_modify_nth List.set_eq_modifyNth
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias removeNth_eq_nthTail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNth_eq_set (f : α → α) :
∀ (n) (l : List α), modifyNth f n l = ((fun a => set l n (f a)) <$> get? l n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, b :: l =>
(congr_arg (cons b) (modifyNth_eq_set f n l)).trans <| by cases h : get? l n <;> simp [h]
#align list.modify_nth_eq_update_nth List.modifyNth_eq_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth List.get?_modifyNth
theorem length_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _ => @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (· + 1) (length_modifyNthTail _ H _ _)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_length List.length_modifyNthTail
-- Porting note: Duplicate of `modify_get?_length`
-- (but with a substantially better name?)
-- @[simp]
theorem length_modifyNth (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modify_get?_length f
#align list.modify_nth_length List.length_modifyNth
#align list.update_nth_length List.length_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth_eq List.get?_modifyNth_eq
#align list.nth_modify_nth_ne List.get?_modifyNth_ne
#align list.nth_update_nth_eq List.get?_set_eq
#align list.nth_update_nth_of_lt List.get?_set_eq_of_lt
#align list.nth_update_nth_ne List.get?_set_ne
#align list.update_nth_nil List.set_nil
#align list.update_nth_succ List.set_succ
#align list.update_nth_comm List.set_comm
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_eq List.get_set_eq
@[simp]
theorem get_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a).get ⟨j, hj⟩ = l.get ⟨j, by simpa using hj⟩ := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.get?_eq_get, List.get?_set_ne _ _ h, List.get?_eq_get]
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_of_ne List.get_set_of_ne
#align list.mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth List.mem_or_eq_of_mem_set
/-! ### map -/
#align list.map_nil List.map_nil
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = foldr (fun a bs => f a :: bs) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.map_eq_foldr List.map_eq_foldr
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : List α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: l, h => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h
rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
#align list.map_congr List.map_congr
theorem map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : List α} : map f l = map g l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x := by
refine ⟨?_, map_congr⟩; intro h x hx
rw [mem_iff_get] at hx; rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
rw [get_map_rev f, get_map_rev g]
congr!
#align list.map_eq_map_iff List.map_eq_map_iff
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_concat List.map_concat
#align list.map_id'' List.map_id'
theorem map_id'' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : List α) : map f l = l := by
simp [show f = id from funext h]
#align list.map_id' List.map_id''
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : List α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero <| by rw [← length_map l f, h]; rfl
#align list.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil List.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : List (List α)) : map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) := by
induction L <;> [rfl; simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_join List.map_join
theorem bind_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_bind ..
#align list.bind_ret_eq_map List.bind_pure_eq_map
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated bind_pure_eq_map (since := "2024-03-24")]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (List.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
bind_pure_eq_map f l
theorem bind_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
List.bind l f = List.bind l g :=
(congr_arg List.join <| map_congr h : _)
#align list.bind_congr List.bind_congr
theorem infix_bind_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.bind f :=
List.infix_of_mem_join (List.mem_map_of_mem f h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
#align list.map_eq_map List.map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.map_tail List.map_tail
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
(map_map _ _ _).symm
#align list.comp_map List.comp_map
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
#align list.map_comp_map List.map_comp_map
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
#align list.map_injective_iff List.map_injective_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (fun a bs => bif p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as := by
induction' as with head tail
· rfl
· simp only [foldr]
cases hp : p head <;> simp [filter, *]
#align list.map_filter_eq_foldr List.map_filter_eq_foldr
theorem getLast_map (f : α → β) {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).getLast (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.getLast hl) := by
induction' l with l_hd l_tl l_ih
· apply (hl rfl).elim
· cases l_tl
· simp
· simpa using l_ih _
#align list.last_map List.getLast_map
theorem map_eq_replicate_iff {l : List α} {f : α → β} {b : β} :
l.map f = replicate l.length b ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = b := by
simp [eq_replicate]
#align list.map_eq_replicate_iff List.map_eq_replicate_iff
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : List α) (b : β) : map (const α b) l = replicate l.length b :=
map_eq_replicate_iff.mpr fun _ _ => rfl
#align list.map_const List.map_const
@[simp] theorem map_const' (l : List α) (b : β) : map (fun _ => b) l = replicate l.length b :=
map_const l b
#align list.map_const' List.map_const'
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
#align list.eq_of_mem_map_const List.eq_of_mem_map_const
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem nil_zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (l : List β) : zipWith f [] l = [] := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.nil_map₂ List.nil_zipWith
theorem zipWith_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : List α) : zipWith f l [] = [] := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.map₂_nil List.zipWith_nil
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_flip (f : α → β → γ) : ∀ as bs, zipWith (flip f) bs as = zipWith f as bs
| [], [] => rfl
| [], b :: bs => rfl
| a :: as, [] => rfl
| a :: as, b :: bs => by
simp! [zipWith_flip]
rfl
#align list.map₂_flip List.zipWith_flip
/-! ### take, drop -/
#align list.take_zero List.take_zero
#align list.take_nil List.take_nil
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : List α) : take (succ n) (a :: l) = a :: take n l :=
rfl
#align list.take_cons List.take_cons
#align list.take_length List.take_length
#align list.take_all_of_le List.take_all_of_le
#align list.take_left List.take_left
#align list.take_left' List.take_left'
#align list.take_take List.take_take
#align list.take_replicate List.take_replicate
#align list.map_take List.map_take
#align list.take_append_eq_append_take List.take_append_eq_append_take
#align list.take_append_of_le_length List.take_append_of_le_length
#align list.take_append List.take_append
#align list.nth_le_take List.get_take
#align list.nth_le_take' List.get_take'
#align list.nth_take List.get?_take
#align list.nth_take_of_succ List.nth_take_of_succ
#align list.take_succ List.take_succ
#align list.take_eq_nil_iff List.take_eq_nil_iff
#align list.take_eq_take List.take_eq_take
#align list.take_add List.take_add
#align list.init_eq_take List.dropLast_eq_take
#align list.init_take List.dropLast_take
#align list.init_cons_of_ne_nil List.dropLast_cons_of_ne_nil
#align list.init_append_of_ne_nil List.dropLast_append_of_ne_nil
#align list.drop_eq_nil_of_le List.drop_eq_nil_of_le
#align list.drop_eq_nil_iff_le List.drop_eq_nil_iff_le
#align list.tail_drop List.tail_drop
@[simp]
theorem drop_tail (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.tail.drop n = l.drop (n + 1) := by
rw [drop_add, drop_one]
theorem cons_get_drop_succ {l : List α} {n} :
l.get n :: l.drop (n.1 + 1) = l.drop n.1 :=
(drop_eq_get_cons n.2).symm
#align list.cons_nth_le_drop_succ List.cons_get_drop_succ
#align list.drop_nil List.drop_nil
#align list.drop_one List.drop_one
#align list.drop_add List.drop_add
#align list.drop_left List.drop_left
#align list.drop_left' List.drop_left'
#align list.drop_eq_nth_le_cons List.drop_eq_get_consₓ -- nth_le vs get
#align list.drop_length List.drop_length
#align list.drop_length_cons List.drop_length_cons
#align list.drop_append_eq_append_drop List.drop_append_eq_append_drop
#align list.drop_append_of_le_length List.drop_append_of_le_length
#align list.drop_append List.drop_append
#align list.drop_sizeof_le List.drop_sizeOf_le
#align list.nth_le_drop List.get_drop
#align list.nth_le_drop' List.get_drop'
#align list.nth_drop List.get?_drop
#align list.drop_drop List.drop_drop
#align list.drop_take List.drop_take
#align list.map_drop List.map_drop
#align list.modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop List.modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop
#align list.modify_nth_eq_take_drop List.modifyNth_eq_take_drop
#align list.modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop List.modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop
#align list.update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop List.set_eq_take_cons_drop
#align list.reverse_take List.reverse_take
#align list.update_nth_eq_nil List.set_eq_nil
section TakeI
variable [Inhabited α]
@[simp]
theorem takeI_length : ∀ n l, length (@takeI α _ n l) = n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ => congr_arg succ (takeI_length _ _)
#align list.take'_length List.takeI_length
@[simp]
theorem takeI_nil : ∀ n, takeI n (@nil α) = replicate n default
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => congr_arg (cons _) (takeI_nil _)
#align list.take'_nil List.takeI_nil
theorem takeI_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : List α}, n ≤ length l → takeI n l = take n l
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _, h => congr_arg (cons _) <| takeI_eq_take <| le_of_succ_le_succ h
#align list.take'_eq_take List.takeI_eq_take
@[simp]
theorem takeI_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : takeI (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(takeI_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, Nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
#align list.take'_left List.takeI_left
theorem takeI_left' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) : takeI n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ := by
rw [← h]; apply takeI_left
#align list.take'_left' List.takeI_left'
end TakeI
/- Porting note: in mathlib3 we just had `take` and `take'`. Now we have `take`, `takeI`, and
`takeD`. The following section replicates the theorems above but for `takeD`. -/
section TakeD
@[simp]
theorem takeD_length : ∀ n l a, length (@takeD α n l a) = n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _, _ => congr_arg succ (takeD_length _ _ _)
-- Porting note: `takeD_nil` is already in std
theorem takeD_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : List α} a, n ≤ length l → takeD n l a = take n l
| 0, _, _, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _, a, h => congr_arg (cons _) <| takeD_eq_take a <| le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp]
theorem takeD_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : takeD (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) a = l₁ :=
(takeD_eq_take a (by simp only [length_append, Nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem takeD_left' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n} {a} (h : length l₁ = n) : takeD n (l₁ ++ l₂) a = l₁ := by
rw [← h]; apply takeD_left
end TakeD
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
#align list.foldl_ext List.foldl_ext
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction' l with hd tl ih; · rfl
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
#align list.foldr_ext List.foldr_ext
#align list.foldl_nil List.foldl_nil
#align list.foldl_cons List.foldl_cons
#align list.foldr_nil List.foldr_nil
#align list.foldr_cons List.foldr_cons
#align list.foldl_append List.foldl_append
#align list.foldr_append List.foldr_append
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
#align list.foldl_fixed' List.foldl_fixed'
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
#align list.foldr_fixed' List.foldr_fixed'
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
#align list.foldl_fixed List.foldl_fixed
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
#align list.foldr_fixed List.foldr_fixed
@[simp]
theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : List (List β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a, [] => rfl
| a, l :: L => by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join f (foldl f a l) L]
#align list.foldl_join List.foldl_join
@[simp]
theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : List (List α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (fun l b => foldr f b l) b L
| a, [] => rfl
| a, l :: L => by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join f a L, foldr_cons]
#align list.foldr_join List.foldr_join
#align list.foldl_reverse List.foldl_reverse
#align list.foldr_reverse List.foldr_reverse
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem foldr_eta : ∀ l : List α, foldr cons [] l = l := by
simp only [foldr_self_append, append_nil, forall_const]
#align list.foldr_eta List.foldr_eta
@[simp]
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
rw [← foldr_reverse]; simp only [foldr_self_append, append_nil, reverse_reverse]
#align list.reverse_foldl List.reverse_foldl
#align list.foldl_map List.foldl_map
#align list.foldr_map List.foldr_map
theorem foldl_map' {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β) (a : α) (l : List α)
(h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
List.foldl f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (List.foldl f a l) := by
induction l generalizing a
· simp
· simp [*, h]
#align list.foldl_map' List.foldl_map'
theorem foldr_map' {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β) (a : α) (l : List α)
(h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
List.foldr f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (List.foldr f a l) := by
induction l generalizing a
· simp
· simp [*, h]
#align list.foldr_map' List.foldr_map'
#align list.foldl_hom List.foldl_hom
#align list.foldr_hom List.foldr_hom
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
#align list.foldl_hom₂ List.foldl_hom₂
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
#align list.foldr_hom₂ List.foldr_hom₂
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction' l with lh lt l_ih generalizing f
· exact hf
· apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
#align list.injective_foldl_comp List.injective_foldl_comp
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldr`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : α → β → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldrRecOn {C : β → Sort*} (l : List α) (op : α → β → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ l, C (op a b)) : C (foldr op b l) := by
induction l with
| nil => exact hb
| cons hd tl IH =>
refine hl _ ?_ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)
refine IH ?_
intro y hy x hx
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx)
#align list.foldr_rec_on List.foldrRecOn
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldl`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : β → α → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldlRecOn {C : β → Sort*} (l : List α) (op : β → α → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ l, C (op b a)) : C (foldl op b l) := by
induction l generalizing b with
| nil => exact hb
| cons hd tl IH =>
refine IH _ ?_ ?_
· exact hl b hb hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)
· intro y hy x hx
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx)
#align list.foldl_rec_on List.foldlRecOn
@[simp]
theorem foldrRecOn_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldrRecOn [] op b hb hl = hb :=
rfl
#align list.foldr_rec_on_nil List.foldrRecOn_nil
@[simp]
theorem foldrRecOn_cons {C : β → Sort*} (x : α) (l : List α) (op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ b, C b → ∀ a ∈ x :: l, C (op a b)) :
foldrRecOn (x :: l) op b hb hl =
hl _ (foldrRecOn l op b hb fun b hb a ha => hl b hb a (mem_cons_of_mem _ ha)) x
(mem_cons_self _ _) :=
rfl
#align list.foldr_rec_on_cons List.foldrRecOn_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldlRecOn_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : β → α → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldlRecOn [] op b hb hl = hb :=
rfl
#align list.foldl_rec_on_nil List.foldlRecOn_nil
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section Scanl
variable {f : β → α → β} {b : β} {a : α} {l : List α}
theorem length_scanl : ∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a, [] => rfl
| a, x :: l => by
rw [scanl, length_cons, length_cons, ← succ_eq_add_one, congr_arg succ]
exact length_scanl _ _
#align list.length_scanl List.length_scanl
@[simp]
theorem scanl_nil (b : β) : scanl f b nil = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.scanl_nil List.scanl_nil
@[simp]
theorem scanl_cons : scanl f b (a :: l) = [b] ++ scanl f (f b a) l := by
simp only [scanl, eq_self_iff_true, singleton_append, and_self_iff]
#align list.scanl_cons List.scanl_cons
@[simp]
theorem get?_zero_scanl : (scanl f b l).get? 0 = some b := by
cases l
· simp only [get?, scanl_nil]
· simp only [get?, scanl_cons, singleton_append]
#align list.nth_zero_scanl List.get?_zero_scanl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} : (scanl f b l).get ⟨0, h⟩ = b := by
cases l
· simp only [get, scanl_nil]
· simp only [get, scanl_cons, singleton_append]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp, deprecated get_zero_scanl (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} : (scanl f b l).nthLe 0 h = b :=
get_zero_scanl
#align list.nth_le_zero_scanl List.nthLe_zero_scanl
theorem get?_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} : (scanl f b l).get? (i + 1) =
((scanl f b l).get? i).bind fun x => (l.get? i).map fun y => f x y := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing b i
· symm
simp only [Option.bind_eq_none', get?, forall₂_true_iff, not_false_iff, Option.map_none',
scanl_nil, Option.not_mem_none, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [scanl_cons, singleton_append]
cases i
· simp only [Option.map_some', get?_zero_scanl, get?, Option.some_bind']
· simp only [hl, get?]
#align list.nth_succ_scanl List.get?_succ_scanl
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem nthLe_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nthLe (i + 1) h =
f ((scanl f b l).nthLe i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt h))
(l.nthLe i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l))))) := by
induction i generalizing b l with
| zero =>
cases l
· simp only [length, zero_eq, lt_self_iff_false] at h
· simp [scanl_cons, singleton_append, nthLe_zero_scanl, nthLe_cons]
| succ i hi =>
cases l
· simp only [length] at h
exact absurd h (by omega)
· simp_rw [scanl_cons]
rw [nthLe_append_right]
· simp only [length, Nat.zero_add 1, succ_add_sub_one, hi]; rfl
· simp only [length_singleton]; omega
#align list.nth_le_succ_scanl List.nthLe_succ_scanl
theorem get_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).get ⟨i + 1, h⟩ =
f ((scanl f b l).get ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt h⟩)
(l.get ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l)))⟩) :=
nthLe_succ_scanl
-- FIXME: we should do the proof the other way around
attribute [deprecated get_succ_scanl (since := "2023-01-05")] nthLe_succ_scanl
end Scanl
-- scanr
@[simp]
theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.scanr_nil List.scanr_nil
#noalign list.scanr_aux_cons
@[simp]
theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
scanr f b (a :: l) = foldr f b (a :: l) :: scanr f b l := by
simp only [scanr, foldr, cons.injEq, and_true]
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih => simp only [foldr, ih]
#align list.scanr_cons List.scanr_cons
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : Commutative f) (hassoc : Associative f)
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| a, b, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw [hassoc]
#align list.foldl1_eq_foldr1 List.foldl1_eq_foldr1
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; rfl
#align list.foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc List.foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
#align list.foldl_eq_foldr List.foldl_eq_foldr
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a, b, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
#align list.foldl_eq_of_comm' List.foldl_eq_of_comm'
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
#align list.foldl_eq_foldr' List.foldl_eq_foldr'
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c))
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a, b, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' ..]; rfl
#align list.foldr_eq_of_comm' List.foldr_eq_of_comm'
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op] [hc : Std.Commutative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂
| [], a₁, a₂ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ =>
calc
((a :: l) <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂) = l <*> a₁ ⋆ a₂ ⋆ a := by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
_ = a₁ ⋆ (a :: l) <*> a₂ := by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
#align list.foldl_assoc List.foldl_assoc
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], a₁, a₂ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
#align list.foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc List.foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
#align list.foldl_assoc_comm_cons List.foldl_assoc_comm_cons
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
#align list.mfoldl_nil List.foldlM_nil
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldr_nil List.foldrM_nil
#align list.mfoldl_cons List.foldlM_cons
/- Porting note: now in std; now assumes an instance of `LawfulMonad m`, so we make everything
`foldrM_eq_foldr` depend on one as well. (An instance of `LawfulMonad m` was already present for
everything following; this just moves it a few lines up.) -/
#align list.mfoldr_cons List.foldrM_cons
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.mfoldr_eq_foldr List.foldrM_eq_foldr
attribute [simp] mapM mapM'
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
#align list.mfoldl_eq_foldl List.foldlM_eq_foldl
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldl_append List.foldlM_append
-- Porting note: now in std
#align list.mfoldr_append List.foldrM_append
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
#align list.intersperse_nil List.intersperse_nil
@[simp]
theorem intersperse_singleton (a b : α) : intersperse a [b] = [b] :=
rfl
#align list.intersperse_singleton List.intersperse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem intersperse_cons_cons (a b c : α) (tl : List α) :
intersperse a (b :: c :: tl) = b :: a :: intersperse a (c :: tl) :=
rfl
#align list.intersperse_cons_cons List.intersperse_cons_cons
/-! ### splitAt and splitOn -/
section SplitAtOn
/- Porting note: the new version of `splitOnP` uses a `Bool`-valued predicate instead of a
`Prop`-valued one. All downstream definitions have been updated to match. -/
variable (p : α → Bool) (xs ys : List α) (ls : List (List α)) (f : List α → List α)
/- Porting note: this had to be rewritten because of the new implementation of `splitAt`. It's
long in large part because `splitAt.go` (`splitAt`'s auxiliary function) works differently
in the case where n ≥ length l, requiring two separate cases (and two separate inductions). Still,
this can hopefully be golfed. -/
@[simp]
theorem splitAt_eq_take_drop (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : splitAt n l = (take n l, drop n l) := by
by_cases h : n < l.length <;> rw [splitAt, go_eq_take_drop]
· rw [if_pos h]; rfl
· rw [if_neg h, take_all_of_le <| le_of_not_lt h, drop_eq_nil_of_le <| le_of_not_lt h]
where
go_eq_take_drop (n : ℕ) (l xs : List α) (acc : Array α) : splitAt.go l xs n acc =
if n < xs.length then (acc.toList ++ take n xs, drop n xs) else (l, []) := by
split_ifs with h
· induction n generalizing xs acc with
| zero =>
rw [splitAt.go, take, drop, append_nil]
· intros h₁; rw [h₁] at h; contradiction
· intros; contradiction
| succ _ ih =>
cases xs with
| nil => contradiction
| cons hd tl =>
rw [length] at h
rw [splitAt.go, take, drop, append_cons, Array.toList_eq, ← Array.push_data,
← Array.toList_eq]
exact ih _ _ <| (by omega)
· induction n generalizing xs acc with
| zero =>
replace h : xs.length = 0 := by omega
rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h, splitAt.go]
| succ _ ih =>
cases xs with
| nil => rw [splitAt.go]
| cons hd tl =>
rw [length] at h
rw [splitAt.go]
exact ih _ _ <| not_imp_not.mpr (Nat.add_lt_add_right · 1) h
#align list.split_at_eq_take_drop List.splitAt_eq_take_drop
@[simp]
theorem splitOn_nil [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : [].splitOn a = [[]] :=
rfl
#align list.split_on_nil List.splitOn_nil
@[simp]
theorem splitOnP_nil : [].splitOnP p = [[]] :=
rfl
#align list.split_on_p_nil List.splitOnP_nilₓ
/- Porting note: `split_on_p_aux` and `split_on_p_aux'` were used to prove facts about
`split_on_p`. `splitOnP` has a different structure, and we need different facts about
`splitOnP.go`. Theorems involving `split_on_p_aux` have been omitted where possible. -/
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_ne_nil
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_spec
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux'
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_eq
#noalign list.split_on_p_aux_nil
theorem splitOnP.go_ne_nil (xs acc : List α) : splitOnP.go p xs acc ≠ [] := by
induction xs generalizing acc <;> simp [go]; split <;> simp [*]
theorem splitOnP.go_acc (xs acc : List α) :
splitOnP.go p xs acc = modifyHead (acc.reverse ++ ·) (splitOnP p xs) := by
induction xs generalizing acc with
| nil => simp only [go, modifyHead, splitOnP_nil, append_nil]
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [splitOnP, go]; split
· simp only [modifyHead, reverse_nil, append_nil]
· rw [ih [hd], modifyHead_modifyHead, ih]
congr; funext x; simp only [reverse_cons, append_assoc]; rfl
theorem splitOnP_ne_nil (xs : List α) : xs.splitOnP p ≠ [] := splitOnP.go_ne_nil _ _ _
#align list.split_on_p_ne_nil List.splitOnP_ne_nilₓ
@[simp]
theorem splitOnP_cons (x : α) (xs : List α) :
(x :: xs).splitOnP p =
if p x then [] :: xs.splitOnP p else (xs.splitOnP p).modifyHead (cons x) := by
rw [splitOnP, splitOnP.go]; split <;> [rfl; simp [splitOnP.go_acc]]
#align list.split_on_p_cons List.splitOnP_consₓ
/-- The original list `L` can be recovered by joining the lists produced by `splitOnP p L`,
interspersed with the elements `L.filter p`. -/
theorem splitOnP_spec (as : List α) :
join (zipWith (· ++ ·) (splitOnP p as) (((as.filter p).map fun x => [x]) ++ [[]])) = as := by
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as' ih =>
rw [splitOnP_cons, filter]
by_cases h : p a
· rw [if_pos h, h, map, cons_append, zipWith, nil_append, join, cons_append, cons_inj]
exact ih
· rw [if_neg h, eq_false_of_ne_true h, join_zipWith (splitOnP_ne_nil _ _)
(append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ [[]] (cons_ne_nil [] [])), cons_inj]
exact ih
where
join_zipWith {xs ys : List (List α)} {a : α} (hxs : xs ≠ []) (hys : ys ≠ []) :
join (zipWith (fun x x_1 ↦ x ++ x_1) (modifyHead (cons a) xs) ys) =
a :: join (zipWith (fun x x_1 ↦ x ++ x_1) xs ys) := by
cases xs with | nil => contradiction | cons =>
cases ys with | nil => contradiction | cons => rfl
#align list.split_on_p_spec List.splitOnP_specₓ
/-- If no element satisfies `p` in the list `xs`, then `xs.splitOnP p = [xs]` -/
theorem splitOnP_eq_single (h : ∀ x ∈ xs, ¬p x) : xs.splitOnP p = [xs] := by
induction xs with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [splitOnP_cons, h hd (mem_cons_self hd tl), if_neg]
rw [ih <| forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h]
rfl
#align list.split_on_p_eq_single List.splitOnP_eq_singleₓ
/-- When a list of the form `[...xs, sep, ...as]` is split on `p`, the first element is `xs`,
assuming no element in `xs` satisfies `p` but `sep` does satisfy `p` -/
theorem splitOnP_first (h : ∀ x ∈ xs, ¬p x) (sep : α) (hsep : p sep) (as : List α) :
(xs ++ sep :: as).splitOnP p = xs :: as.splitOnP p := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp [hsep]
| cons hd tl ih => simp [h hd _, ih <| forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h]
#align list.split_on_p_first List.splitOnP_firstₓ
/-- `intercalate [x]` is the left inverse of `splitOn x` -/
theorem intercalate_splitOn (x : α) [DecidableEq α] : [x].intercalate (xs.splitOn x) = xs := by
simp only [intercalate, splitOn]
induction' xs with hd tl ih; · simp [join]
cases' h' : splitOnP (· == x) tl with hd' tl'; · exact (splitOnP_ne_nil _ tl h').elim
rw [h'] at ih
rw [splitOnP_cons]
split_ifs with h
· rw [beq_iff_eq] at h
subst h
simp [ih, join, h']
cases tl' <;> simpa [join, h'] using ih
#align list.intercalate_split_on List.intercalate_splitOn
/-- `splitOn x` is the left inverse of `intercalate [x]`, on the domain
consisting of each nonempty list of lists `ls` whose elements do not contain `x` -/
theorem splitOn_intercalate [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (hx : ∀ l ∈ ls, x ∉ l) (hls : ls ≠ []) :
([x].intercalate ls).splitOn x = ls := by
simp only [intercalate]
induction' ls with hd tl ih; · contradiction
cases tl
· suffices hd.splitOn x = [hd] by simpa [join]
refine splitOnP_eq_single _ _ ?_
intro y hy H
rw [eq_of_beq H] at hy
refine hx hd ?_ hy
simp
· simp only [intersperse_cons_cons, singleton_append, join]
specialize ih _ _
· intro l hl
apply hx l
simp only [mem_cons] at hl ⊢
exact Or.inr hl
· exact List.noConfusion
have := splitOnP_first (· == x) hd ?h x (beq_self_eq_true _)
case h =>
intro y hy H
rw [eq_of_beq H] at hy
exact hx hd (.head _) hy
simp only [splitOn] at ih ⊢
rw [this, ih]
#align list.split_on_intercalate List.splitOn_intercalate
end SplitAtOn
/- Porting note: new; here tentatively -/
/-! ### modifyLast -/
section ModifyLast
theorem modifyLast.go_append_one (f : α → α) (a : α) (tl : List α) (r : Array α) :
modifyLast.go f (tl ++ [a]) r = (r.toListAppend <| modifyLast.go f (tl ++ [a]) #[]) := by
cases tl with
| nil =>
simp only [nil_append, modifyLast.go]; rfl
| cons hd tl =>
simp only [cons_append]
rw [modifyLast.go, modifyLast.go]
case x_3 | x_3 => exact append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right tl [a] (cons_ne_nil a [])
rw [modifyLast.go_append_one _ _ tl _, modifyLast.go_append_one _ _ tl (Array.push #[] hd)]
simp only [Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.push_data, Array.data_toArray, nil_append, append_assoc]
theorem modifyLast_append_one (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
modifyLast f (l ++ [a]) = l ++ [f a] := by
cases l with
| nil =>
simp only [nil_append, modifyLast, modifyLast.go, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.data_toArray]
| cons _ tl =>
simp only [cons_append, modifyLast]
rw [modifyLast.go]
case x_3 => exact append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right tl [a] (cons_ne_nil a [])
rw [modifyLast.go_append_one, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.push_data, Array.data_toArray,
nil_append, cons_append, nil_append, cons_inj]
exact modifyLast_append_one _ _ tl
theorem modifyLast_append (f : α → α) (l₁ l₂ : List α) (_ : l₂ ≠ []) :
modifyLast f (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyLast f l₂ := by
cases l₂ with
| nil => contradiction
| cons hd tl =>
cases tl with
| nil => exact modifyLast_append_one _ hd _
| cons hd' tl' =>
rw [append_cons, ← nil_append (hd :: hd' :: tl'), append_cons [], nil_append,
modifyLast_append _ (l₁ ++ [hd]) (hd' :: tl') _, modifyLast_append _ [hd] (hd' :: tl') _,
append_assoc]
all_goals { exact cons_ne_nil _ _ }
end ModifyLast
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
#align list.pmap List.pmap
#align list.attach List.attach
@[simp] lemma attach_nil : ([] : List α).attach = [] := rfl
#align list.attach_nil List.attach_nil
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction' l with h t ih <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
#align list.sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : List α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (fun a _ => f a) l H = map f l := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, pmap, map]]
#align list.pmap_eq_map List.pmap_eq_map
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {g : ∀ a, q a → β} (l : List α) {H₁ H₂}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ (h₁ h₂), f a h₁ = g a h₂) : pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ := by
induction' l with _ _ ih
· rfl
· rw [pmap, pmap, h _ (mem_cons_self _ _), ih fun a ha => h a (mem_cons_of_mem _ ha)]
#align list.pmap_congr List.pmap_congr
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l H) :
map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (fun a h => g (f a h)) l H := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, pmap, map]]
#align list.map_pmap List.map_pmap
theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (g : ∀ b, p b → γ) (f : α → β) (l H) :
pmap g (map f l) H = pmap (fun a h => g (f a) h) l fun a h => H _ (mem_map_of_mem _ h) := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, pmap, map]]
#align list.pmap_map List.pmap_map
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l H) :
pmap f l H = l.attach.map fun x => f x.1 (H _ x.2) := by
rw [attach, attachWith, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l fun _ _ _ _ => rfl
#align list.pmap_eq_map_attach List.pmap_eq_map_attach
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10959): lean 4 simp can't rewrite with this
theorem attach_map_coe' (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
(l.attach.map fun (i : {i // i ∈ l}) => f i) = l.map f := by
rw [attach, attachWith, map_pmap]; exact pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _
#align list.attach_map_coe' List.attach_map_coe'
theorem attach_map_val' (l : List α) (f : α → β) : (l.attach.map fun i => f i.val) = l.map f :=
attach_map_coe' _ _
#align list.attach_map_val' List.attach_map_val'
@[simp]
theorem attach_map_val (l : List α) : l.attach.map Subtype.val = l :=
(attach_map_coe' _ _).trans l.map_id
-- Porting note: coe is expanded eagerly, so "attach_map_coe" would have the same syntactic form.
#align list.attach_map_coe List.attach_map_val
#align list.attach_map_val List.attach_map_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_attach (l : List α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach
| ⟨a, h⟩ => by
have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val] <;> exact h)
rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩
exact m
#align list.mem_attach List.mem_attach
@[simp]
theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l H b} :
b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b := by
simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and_iff, Subtype.exists, eq_comm]
#align list.mem_pmap List.mem_pmap
@[simp]
theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, pmap, length]]
#align list.length_pmap List.length_pmap
@[simp]
theorem length_attach (L : List α) : L.attach.length = L.length :=
length_pmap
#align list.length_attach List.length_attach
@[simp]
theorem pmap_eq_nil {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l H} : pmap f l H = [] ↔ l = [] := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_pmap, length_eq_zero]
#align list.pmap_eq_nil List.pmap_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_nil (l : List α) : l.attach = [] ↔ l = [] :=
pmap_eq_nil
#align list.attach_eq_nil List.attach_eq_nil
theorem getLast_pmap (p : α → Prop) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l : List α)
(hl₁ : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (hl₂ : l ≠ []) :
(l.pmap f hl₁).getLast (mt List.pmap_eq_nil.1 hl₂) =
f (l.getLast hl₂) (hl₁ _ (List.getLast_mem hl₂)) := by
induction' l with l_hd l_tl l_ih
· apply (hl₂ rfl).elim
· by_cases hl_tl : l_tl = []
· simp [hl_tl]
· simp only [pmap]
rw [getLast_cons, l_ih _ hl_tl]
simp only [getLast_cons hl_tl]
#align list.last_pmap List.getLast_pmap
theorem get?_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (n : ℕ) :
get? (pmap f l h) n = Option.pmap f (get? l n) fun x H => h x (get?_mem H) := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing n
· simp
· cases' n with n
· simp
· simp [hl]
#align list.nth_pmap List.get?_pmap
theorem get_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
get (pmap f l h) ⟨n, hn⟩ =
f (get l ⟨n, @length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn⟩)
(h _ (get_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing n
· simp only [length, pmap] at hn
exact absurd hn (not_lt_of_le n.zero_le)
· cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated get_pmap (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
nthLe (pmap f l h) n hn =
f (nthLe l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))
(h _ (get_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) :=
get_pmap ..
#align list.nth_le_pmap List.nthLe_pmap
theorem pmap_append {p : ι → Prop} (f : ∀ a : ι, p a → α) (l₁ l₂ : List ι)
(h : ∀ a ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p a) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).pmap f h =
(l₁.pmap f fun a ha => h a (mem_append_left l₂ ha)) ++
l₂.pmap f fun a ha => h a (mem_append_right l₁ ha) := by
induction' l₁ with _ _ ih
· rfl
· dsimp only [pmap, cons_append]
rw [ih]
#align list.pmap_append List.pmap_append
theorem pmap_append' {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a : α, p a → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α)
(h₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a) (h₂ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, p a) :
((l₁ ++ l₂).pmap f fun a ha => (List.mem_append.1 ha).elim (h₁ a) (h₂ a)) =
l₁.pmap f h₁ ++ l₂.pmap f h₂ :=
pmap_append f l₁ l₂ _
#align list.pmap_append' List.pmap_append'
/-! ### find -/
section find?
variable {p : α → Bool} {l : List α} {a : α}
#align list.find_nil List.find?_nil
-- @[simp]
-- Later porting note (at time of this lemma moving to Batteries):
-- removing attribute `nolint simpNF`
attribute [simp 1100] find?_cons_of_pos
#align list.find_cons_of_pos List.find?_cons_of_pos
-- @[simp]
-- Later porting note (at time of this lemma moving to Batteries):
-- removing attribute `nolint simpNF`
attribute [simp 1100] find?_cons_of_neg
#align list.find_cons_of_neg List.find?_cons_of_neg
attribute [simp] find?_eq_none
#align list.find_eq_none List.find?_eq_none
#align list.find_some List.find?_some
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-05")] alias find?_mem := mem_of_find?_eq_some
#align list.find_mem List.mem_of_find?_eq_some
end find?
/-! ### lookmap -/
section Lookmap
variable (f : α → Option α)
/- Porting note: need a helper theorem for lookmap.go. -/
theorem lookmap.go_append (l : List α) (acc : Array α) :
lookmap.go f l acc = acc.toListAppend (lookmap f l) := by
cases l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl =>
rw [lookmap, go, go]
cases f hd with
| none => simp only [go_append tl _, Array.toListAppend_eq, append_assoc, Array.push_data]; rfl
| some a => rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] :=
rfl
#align list.lookmap_nil List.lookmap_nil
@[simp]
theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : List α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f := by
simp only [lookmap, lookmap.go, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.data_toArray, nil_append]
rw [lookmap.go_append, h]; rfl
#align list.lookmap_cons_none List.lookmap_cons_none
@[simp]
theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : List α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l := by
simp only [lookmap, lookmap.go, Array.toListAppend_eq, Array.data_toArray, nil_append]
rw [h]
#align list.lookmap_cons_some List.lookmap_cons_some
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : List α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] => rfl
| _ :: _ => rfl
#align list.lookmap_some List.lookmap_some
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : List α, (l.lookmap fun _ => none) = l
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => (lookmap_cons_none _ l rfl).trans (congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l))
#align list.lookmap_none List.lookmap_none
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → Option α} :
∀ {l : List α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: l, H => by
cases' forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂
cases' h : g a with b
· simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂]
· simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)]
#align list.lookmap_congr List.lookmap_congr
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
#align list.lookmap_of_forall_not List.lookmap_of_forall_not
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ (a), ∀ b ∈ f a, g a = g b) :
∀ l : List α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by
cases' h' : f a with b
· simpa [h'] using lookmap_map_eq _ h l
· simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h']
#align list.lookmap_map_eq List.lookmap_map_eq
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ (a), ∀ b ∈ f a, a = b) (l : List α) : l.lookmap f = l := by
rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
#align list.lookmap_id' List.lookmap_id'
theorem length_lookmap (l : List α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l := by
rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ fun _ => (), length_map]; simp
#align list.length_lookmap List.length_lookmap
end Lookmap
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
#align list.filter_map_nil List.filterMap_nil
-- Later porting note (at time of this lemma moving to Batteries):
-- removing attribute `nolint simpNF`
attribute [simp 1100] filterMap_cons_none
#align list.filter_map_cons_none List.filterMap_cons_none
-- Later porting note (at time of this lemma moving to Batteries):
-- removing attribute `nolint simpNF`
attribute [simp 1100] filterMap_cons_some
#align list.filter_map_cons_some List.filterMap_cons_some
#align list.filter_map_cons List.filterMap_cons
#align list.filter_map_append List.filterMap_append
#align list.filter_map_eq_map List.filterMap_eq_map
#align list.filter_map_eq_filter List.filterMap_eq_filter
#align list.filter_map_filter_map List.filterMap_filterMap
#align list.map_filter_map List.map_filterMap
#align list.filter_map_map List.filterMap_map
#align list.filter_filter_map List.filter_filterMap
#align list.filter_map_filter List.filterMap_filter
#align list.filter_map_some List.filterMap_some
#align list.map_filter_map_some_eq_filter_map_is_some List.map_filterMap_some_eq_filter_map_is_some
#align list.mem_filter_map List.mem_filterMap
#align list.filter_map_join List.filterMap_join
#align list.map_filter_map_of_inv List.map_filterMap_of_inv
#align list.length_filter_le List.length_filter_leₓ
#align list.length_filter_map_le List.length_filterMap_le
#align list.sublist.filter_map List.Sublist.filterMap
theorem Sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
filterMap_eq_map f ▸ s.filterMap _
#align list.sublist.map List.Sublist.map
theorem filterMap_eq_bind_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.bind fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction' l with a l ih <;> simp
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction' l with a l ih <;> simp
simp [ih (fun x hx ↦ h x (List.mem_cons_of_mem a hx))]
cases' hfa : f a with b
· have : g a = none := Eq.symm (by simpa [hfa] using h a (by simp))
simp [this]
· have : g a = some b := Eq.symm (by simpa [hfa] using h a (by simp))
simp [this]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction' l with a l ih
· simp
cases' ha : f a with b <;> simp [ha]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun (List.filterMap_eq_map _) _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
-- Porting note: Lemmas for `filter` are stated in terms of `p : α → Bool`
-- rather than `p : α → Prop` with `DecidablePred p`, since `filter` itself is.
-- Likewise, `if` sometimes becomes `bif`.
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
#align list.filter_singleton List.filter_singleton
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#align list.filter_eq_foldr List.filter_eq_foldr
#align list.filter_congr' List.filter_congr'
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
(filter_sublist l).subset
#align list.filter_subset List.filter_subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
#align list.of_mem_filter List.of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
#align list.mem_of_mem_filter List.mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align list.mem_filter_of_mem List.mem_filter_of_mem
#align list.mem_filter List.mem_filter
theorem monotone_filter_left (p : α → Bool) ⦃l l' : List α⦄ (h : l ⊆ l') :
filter p l ⊆ filter p l' := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_filter] at hx ⊢
exact ⟨h hx.left, hx.right⟩
#align list.monotone_filter_left List.monotone_filter_left
#align list.filter_eq_self List.filter_eq_self
#align list.filter_length_eq_length List.filter_length_eq_length
#align list.filter_eq_nil List.filter_eq_nil
variable (p)
#align list.sublist.filter List.Sublist.filter
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· rfl
· by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ hp, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ hq]
exact IH
#align list.monotone_filter_right List.monotone_filter_right
#align list.map_filter List.map_filter
lemma map_filter' {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [(· ∘ ·), map_filter, hf.eq_iff]
#align list.map_filter' List.map_filter'
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun x => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [(· ∘ ·), map_filter' _ Subtype.coe_injective]
#align list.filter_attach' List.filter_attach'
-- Porting note: `Lean.Internal.coeM` forces us to type-ascript `{x // x ∈ l}`
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun x => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, (· ∘ ·), Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← map_filter, attach_map_val]
#align list.filter_attach List.filter_attach
#align list.filter_filter List.filter_filter
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [and_comm]
#align list.filter_comm List.filter_comm
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
#align list.filter_true List.filter_true
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
#align list.filter_false List.filter_false
/- Porting note: need a helper theorem for span.loop. -/
theorem span.loop_eq_take_drop :
∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, span.loop p l₁ l₂ = (l₂.reverse ++ takeWhile p l₁, dropWhile p l₁)
| [], l₂ => by simp [span.loop, takeWhile, dropWhile]
| (a :: l), l₂ => by
cases hp : p a <;> simp [hp, span.loop, span.loop_eq_take_drop, takeWhile, dropWhile]
@[simp]
theorem span_eq_take_drop (l : List α) : span p l = (takeWhile p l, dropWhile p l) := by
simpa using span.loop_eq_take_drop p l []
#align list.span_eq_take_drop List.span_eq_take_drop
#align list.take_while_append_drop List.takeWhile_append_dropWhile
-- TODO update to use `get` instead of `nthLe`
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem dropWhile_nthLe_zero_not (l : List α) (hl : 0 < (l.dropWhile p).length) :
¬p ((l.dropWhile p).nthLe 0 hl) := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· cases hl
· simp only [dropWhile]
by_cases hp : p hd
· simp [hp, IH]
· simp [hp, nthLe_cons]
-- Porting note: How did the Lean 3 proof work,
-- without mentioning nthLe_cons?
-- Same question for takeWhile_eq_nil_iff below
#align list.drop_while_nth_le_zero_not List.dropWhile_nthLe_zero_not
variable {p} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem dropWhile_eq_nil_iff : dropWhile p l = [] ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x := by
induction' l with x xs IH
· simp [dropWhile]
· by_cases hp : p x <;> simp [hp, dropWhile, IH]
#align list.drop_while_eq_nil_iff List.dropWhile_eq_nil_iff
@[simp] theorem takeWhile_nil : List.takeWhile p [] = [] := rfl
theorem takeWhile_cons {x : α} :
List.takeWhile p (x :: l) = (match p x with
| true => x :: takeWhile p l
| false => []) :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 3,007 | 3,009 | theorem takeWhile_cons_of_pos {x : α} (h : p x) :
List.takeWhile p (x :: l) = x :: takeWhile p l := by |
simp [takeWhile_cons, h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Valuation
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.WithZeroTopology
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformField
#align_import topology.algebra.valued_field from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e0c4d76b6ebe9dfafb67d16f7286d2731ed6064"
/-!
# Valued fields and their completions
In this file we study the topology of a field `K` endowed with a valuation (in our application
to adic spaces, `K` will be the valuation field associated to some valuation on a ring, defined in
valuation.basic).
We already know from valuation.topology that one can build a topology on `K` which
makes it a topological ring.
The first goal is to show `K` is a topological *field*, ie inversion is continuous
at every non-zero element.
The next goal is to prove `K` is a *completable* topological field. This gives us
a completion `hat K` which is a topological field. We also prove that `K` is automatically
separated, so the map from `K` to `hat K` is injective.
Then we extend the valuation given on `K` to a valuation on `hat K`.
-/
open Filter Set
open Topology
section DivisionRing
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionRing K] {Γ₀ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
section ValuationTopologicalDivisionRing
section InversionEstimate
variable (v : Valuation K Γ₀)
-- The following is the main technical lemma ensuring that inversion is continuous
-- in the topology induced by a valuation on a division ring (i.e. the next instance)
-- and the fact that a valued field is completable
-- [BouAC, VI.5.1 Lemme 1]
theorem Valuation.inversion_estimate {x y : K} {γ : Γ₀ˣ} (y_ne : y ≠ 0)
(h : v (x - y) < min (γ * (v y * v y)) (v y)) : v (x⁻¹ - y⁻¹) < γ := by
have hyp1 : v (x - y) < γ * (v y * v y) := lt_of_lt_of_le h (min_le_left _ _)
have hyp1' : v (x - y) * (v y * v y)⁻¹ < γ := mul_inv_lt_of_lt_mul₀ hyp1
have hyp2 : v (x - y) < v y := lt_of_lt_of_le h (min_le_right _ _)
have key : v x = v y := Valuation.map_eq_of_sub_lt v hyp2
have x_ne : x ≠ 0 := by
intro h
apply y_ne
rw [h, v.map_zero] at key
exact v.zero_iff.1 key.symm
have decomp : x⁻¹ - y⁻¹ = x⁻¹ * (y - x) * y⁻¹ := by
rw [mul_sub_left_distrib, sub_mul, mul_assoc, show y * y⁻¹ = 1 from mul_inv_cancel y_ne,
show x⁻¹ * x = 1 from inv_mul_cancel x_ne, mul_one, one_mul]
calc
v (x⁻¹ - y⁻¹) = v (x⁻¹ * (y - x) * y⁻¹) := by rw [decomp]
_ = v x⁻¹ * (v <| y - x) * v y⁻¹ := by repeat' rw [Valuation.map_mul]
_ = (v x)⁻¹ * (v <| y - x) * (v y)⁻¹ := by rw [map_inv₀, map_inv₀]
_ = (v <| y - x) * (v y * v y)⁻¹ := by rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm, key, mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev]
_ = (v <| y - x) * (v y * v y)⁻¹ := rfl
_ = (v <| x - y) * (v y * v y)⁻¹ := by rw [Valuation.map_sub_swap]
_ < γ := hyp1'
#align valuation.inversion_estimate Valuation.inversion_estimate
end InversionEstimate
open Valued
/-- The topology coming from a valuation on a division ring makes it a topological division ring
[BouAC, VI.5.1 middle of Proposition 1] -/
instance (priority := 100) Valued.topologicalDivisionRing [Valued K Γ₀] :
TopologicalDivisionRing K :=
{ (by infer_instance : TopologicalRing K) with
continuousAt_inv₀ := by
intro x x_ne s s_in
cases' Valued.mem_nhds.mp s_in with γ hs; clear s_in
rw [mem_map, Valued.mem_nhds]
change ∃ γ : Γ₀ˣ, { y : K | (v (y - x) : Γ₀) < γ } ⊆ { x : K | x⁻¹ ∈ s }
have vx_ne := (Valuation.ne_zero_iff <| v).mpr x_ne
let γ' := Units.mk0 _ vx_ne
use min (γ * (γ' * γ')) γ'
intro y y_in
apply hs
simp only [mem_setOf_eq] at y_in
rw [Units.min_val, Units.val_mul, Units.val_mul] at y_in
exact Valuation.inversion_estimate _ x_ne y_in }
#align valued.topological_division_ring Valued.topologicalDivisionRing
/-- A valued division ring is separated. -/
instance (priority := 100) ValuedRing.separated [Valued K Γ₀] : T0Space K := by
suffices T2Space K by infer_instance
apply TopologicalAddGroup.t2Space_of_zero_sep
intro x x_ne
refine ⟨{ k | v k < v x }, ?_, fun h => lt_irrefl _ h⟩
rw [Valued.mem_nhds]
have vx_ne := (Valuation.ne_zero_iff <| v).mpr x_ne
let γ' := Units.mk0 _ vx_ne
exact ⟨γ', fun y hy => by simpa using hy⟩
#align valued_ring.separated ValuedRing.separated
section
open WithZeroTopology
open Valued
theorem Valued.continuous_valuation [Valued K Γ₀] : Continuous (v : K → Γ₀) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h)
· rw [ContinuousAt, map_zero, WithZeroTopology.tendsto_zero]
intro γ hγ
rw [Filter.Eventually, Valued.mem_nhds_zero]
use Units.mk0 γ hγ; rfl
· have v_ne : (v x : Γ₀) ≠ 0 := (Valuation.ne_zero_iff _).mpr h
rw [ContinuousAt, WithZeroTopology.tendsto_of_ne_zero v_ne]
apply Valued.loc_const v_ne
#align valued.continuous_valuation Valued.continuous_valuation
end
end ValuationTopologicalDivisionRing
end DivisionRing
namespace Valued
open UniformSpace
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {Γ₀ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀] [hv : Valued K Γ₀]
local notation "hat " => Completion
/-- A valued field is completable. -/
instance (priority := 100) completable : CompletableTopField K :=
{ ValuedRing.separated with
nice := by
rintro F hF h0
have : ∃ γ₀ : Γ₀ˣ, ∃ M ∈ F, ∀ x ∈ M, (γ₀ : Γ₀) ≤ v x := by
rcases Filter.inf_eq_bot_iff.mp h0 with ⟨U, U_in, M, M_in, H⟩
rcases Valued.mem_nhds_zero.mp U_in with ⟨γ₀, hU⟩
exists γ₀, M, M_in
intro x xM
apply le_of_not_lt _
intro hyp
have : x ∈ U ∩ M := ⟨hU hyp, xM⟩
rwa [H] at this
rcases this with ⟨γ₀, M₀, M₀_in, H₀⟩
rw [Valued.cauchy_iff] at hF ⊢
refine ⟨hF.1.map _, ?_⟩
replace hF := hF.2
intro γ
rcases hF (min (γ * γ₀ * γ₀) γ₀) with ⟨M₁, M₁_in, H₁⟩
clear hF
use (fun x : K => x⁻¹) '' (M₀ ∩ M₁)
constructor
· rw [mem_map]
apply mem_of_superset (Filter.inter_mem M₀_in M₁_in)
exact subset_preimage_image _ _
· rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨x_in₀, x_in₁⟩, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, ⟨_, y_in₁⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
specialize H₁ x x_in₁ y y_in₁
replace x_in₀ := H₀ x x_in₀
clear H₀
apply Valuation.inversion_estimate
· have : (v x : Γ₀) ≠ 0 := by
intro h
rw [h] at x_in₀
simp at x_in₀
exact (Valuation.ne_zero_iff _).mp this
· refine lt_of_lt_of_le H₁ ?_
rw [Units.min_val]
apply min_le_min _ x_in₀
rw [mul_assoc]
have : ((γ₀ * γ₀ : Γ₀ˣ) : Γ₀) ≤ v x * v x :=
calc
↑γ₀ * ↑γ₀ ≤ ↑γ₀ * v x := mul_le_mul_left' x_in₀ ↑γ₀
_ ≤ _ := mul_le_mul_right' x_in₀ (v x)
rw [Units.val_mul]
exact mul_le_mul_left' this γ }
#align valued.completable Valued.completable
open WithZeroTopology
/-- The extension of the valuation of a valued field to the completion of the field. -/
noncomputable def extension : hat K → Γ₀ :=
Completion.denseInducing_coe.extend (v : K → Γ₀)
#align valued.extension Valued.extension
theorem continuous_extension : Continuous (Valued.extension : hat K → Γ₀) := by
refine Completion.denseInducing_coe.continuous_extend ?_
intro x₀
rcases eq_or_ne x₀ 0 with (rfl | h)
· refine ⟨0, ?_⟩
erw [← Completion.denseInducing_coe.toInducing.nhds_eq_comap]
exact Valued.continuous_valuation.tendsto' 0 0 (map_zero v)
· have preimage_one : v ⁻¹' {(1 : Γ₀)} ∈ 𝓝 (1 : K) := by
have : (v (1 : K) : Γ₀) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Valuation.map_one]
exact zero_ne_one.symm
convert Valued.loc_const this
ext x
rw [Valuation.map_one, mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq]
obtain ⟨V, V_in, hV⟩ : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : hat K), ∀ x : K, (x : hat K) ∈ V → (v x : Γ₀) = 1 := by
rwa [Completion.denseInducing_coe.nhds_eq_comap, mem_comap] at preimage_one
have : ∃ V' ∈ 𝓝 (1 : hat K), (0 : hat K) ∉ V' ∧ ∀ (x) (_ : x ∈ V') (y) (_ : y ∈ V'),
x * y⁻¹ ∈ V := by
have : Tendsto (fun p : hat K × hat K => p.1 * p.2⁻¹) ((𝓝 1) ×ˢ (𝓝 1)) (𝓝 1) := by
rw [← nhds_prod_eq]
conv =>
congr
rfl
rfl
rw [← one_mul (1 : hat K)]
refine
Tendsto.mul continuous_fst.continuousAt (Tendsto.comp ?_ continuous_snd.continuousAt)
-- Porting note: Added `ContinuousAt.tendsto`
convert (continuousAt_inv₀ (zero_ne_one.symm : 1 ≠ (0 : hat K))).tendsto
exact inv_one.symm
rcases tendsto_prod_self_iff.mp this V V_in with ⟨U, U_in, hU⟩
let hatKstar := ({0}ᶜ : Set <| hat K)
have : hatKstar ∈ 𝓝 (1 : hat K) := compl_singleton_mem_nhds zero_ne_one.symm
use U ∩ hatKstar, Filter.inter_mem U_in this
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, h'⟩
rw [mem_compl_singleton_iff] at h'
exact h' rfl
· rintro x ⟨hx, _⟩ y ⟨hy, _⟩
apply hU <;> assumption
rcases this with ⟨V', V'_in, zeroV', hV'⟩
have nhds_right : (fun x => x * x₀) '' V' ∈ 𝓝 x₀ := by
have l : Function.LeftInverse (fun x : hat K => x * x₀⁻¹) fun x : hat K => x * x₀ := by
intro x
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel h, mul_one]
have r : Function.RightInverse (fun x : hat K => x * x₀⁻¹) fun x : hat K => x * x₀ := by
intro x
simp only [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel h, mul_one]
have c : Continuous fun x : hat K => x * x₀⁻¹ := continuous_id.mul continuous_const
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse l r]
rw [← mul_inv_cancel h] at V'_in
exact c.continuousAt V'_in
have : ∃ z₀ : K, ∃ y₀ ∈ V', ↑z₀ = y₀ * x₀ ∧ z₀ ≠ 0 := by
rcases Completion.denseRange_coe.mem_nhds nhds_right with ⟨z₀, y₀, y₀_in, H : y₀ * x₀ = z₀⟩
refine ⟨z₀, y₀, y₀_in, ⟨H.symm, ?_⟩⟩
rintro rfl
exact mul_ne_zero (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem y₀_in zeroV') h H
rcases this with ⟨z₀, y₀, y₀_in, hz₀, z₀_ne⟩
have vz₀_ne : (v z₀ : Γ₀) ≠ 0 := by rwa [Valuation.ne_zero_iff]
refine ⟨v z₀, ?_⟩
rw [WithZeroTopology.tendsto_of_ne_zero vz₀_ne, eventually_comap]
filter_upwards [nhds_right] with x x_in a ha
rcases x_in with ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩
have : (v (a * z₀⁻¹) : Γ₀) = 1 := by
apply hV
have : (z₀⁻¹ : K) = (z₀ : hat K)⁻¹ := map_inv₀ (Completion.coeRingHom : K →+* hat K) z₀
rw [Completion.coe_mul, this, ha, hz₀, mul_inv, mul_comm y₀⁻¹, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc y,
mul_inv_cancel h, mul_one]
solve_by_elim
calc
v a = v (a * z₀⁻¹ * z₀) := by rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel z₀_ne, mul_one]
_ = v (a * z₀⁻¹) * v z₀ := Valuation.map_mul _ _ _
_ = v z₀ := by rw [this, one_mul]
#align valued.continuous_extension Valued.continuous_extension
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem extension_extends (x : K) : extension (x : hat K) = v x := by
refine Completion.denseInducing_coe.extend_eq_of_tendsto ?_
rw [← Completion.denseInducing_coe.nhds_eq_comap]
exact Valued.continuous_valuation.continuousAt
#align valued.extension_extends Valued.extension_extends
/-- the extension of a valuation on a division ring to its completion. -/
noncomputable def extensionValuation : Valuation (hat K) Γ₀ where
toFun := Valued.extension
map_zero' := by
rw [← v.map_zero (R := K), ← Valued.extension_extends (0 : K)]
rfl
map_one' := by
simp only
rw [← Completion.coe_one, Valued.extension_extends (1 : K)]
exact Valuation.map_one _
map_mul' x y := by
apply Completion.induction_on₂ x y
(p := fun x y => extension (x * y) = extension x * extension y)
· have c1 : Continuous fun x : hat K × hat K => Valued.extension (x.1 * x.2) :=
Valued.continuous_extension.comp (continuous_fst.mul continuous_snd)
have c2 : Continuous fun x : hat K × hat K => Valued.extension x.1 * Valued.extension x.2 :=
(Valued.continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).mul
(Valued.continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)
exact isClosed_eq c1 c2
· intro x y
norm_cast
exact Valuation.map_mul _ _ _
map_add_le_max' x y := by
rw [le_max_iff]
apply Completion.induction_on₂ x y
(p := fun x y => extension (x + y) ≤ extension x ∨ extension (x + y) ≤ extension y)
· have cont : Continuous (Valued.extension : hat K → Γ₀) := Valued.continuous_extension
exact
(isClosed_le (cont.comp continuous_add) <| cont.comp continuous_fst).union
(isClosed_le (cont.comp continuous_add) <| cont.comp continuous_snd)
· intro x y
norm_cast
rw [← le_max_iff]
exact v.map_add x y
#align valued.extension_valuation Valued.extensionValuation
-- Bourbaki CA VI §5 no.3 Proposition 5 (d)
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/ValuedField.lean | 319 | 343 | theorem closure_coe_completion_v_lt {γ : Γ₀ˣ} :
closure ((↑) '' { x : K | v x < (γ : Γ₀) }) =
{ x : hat K | extensionValuation x < (γ : Γ₀) } := by |
ext x
let γ₀ := extensionValuation x
suffices γ₀ ≠ 0 → (x ∈ closure ((↑) '' { x : K | v x < (γ : Γ₀) }) ↔ γ₀ < (γ : Γ₀)) by
rcases eq_or_ne γ₀ 0 with h | h
· simp only [h, (Valuation.zero_iff _).mp h, mem_setOf_eq, Valuation.map_zero, Units.zero_lt,
iff_true_iff]
apply subset_closure
exact ⟨0, by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, Valuation.map_zero, Units.zero_lt, true_and_iff]; rfl⟩
· exact this h
intro h
have hγ₀ : extension ⁻¹' {γ₀} ∈ 𝓝 x :=
continuous_extension.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds
(WithZeroTopology.singleton_mem_nhds_of_ne_zero h)
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds']
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx s hs => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨⟨-, y, hy₁ : v y < (γ : Γ₀), rfl⟩, hy₂⟩ := hx _ hγ₀
replace hy₂ : v y = γ₀ := by simpa using hy₂
rwa [← hy₂]
· obtain ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ := Completion.denseRange_coe.mem_nhds (inter_mem hγ₀ hs)
replace hy₁ : v y = γ₀ := by simpa using hy₁
rw [← hy₁] at hx
exact ⟨⟨y, ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩⟩, hy₂⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Invertible.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Units
#align_import group_theory.group_action.group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3b52265189f3fb43aa631edffce5d060fafaf82f"
/-!
# Group actions applied to various types of group
This file contains lemmas about `SMul` on `GroupWithZero`, and `Group`.
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
section MulAction
section Group
variable [Group α] [MulAction α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Group.lean | 30 | 30 | theorem inv_smul_smul (c : α) (x : β) : c⁻¹ • c • x = x := by | rw [smul_smul, mul_left_inv, one_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sublists
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
#align_import group_theory.free_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f93c11933efbc3c2f0299e47b8ff83e9b539cbf6"
/-!
# Free groups
This file defines free groups over a type. Furthermore, it is shown that the free group construction
is an instance of a monad. For the result that `FreeGroup` is the left adjoint to the forgetful
functor from groups to types, see `Algebra/Category/Group/Adjunctions`.
## Main definitions
* `FreeGroup`/`FreeAddGroup`: the free group (resp. free additive group) associated to a type
`α` defined as the words over `a : α × Bool` modulo the relation `a * x * x⁻¹ * b = a * b`.
* `FreeGroup.mk`/`FreeAddGroup.mk`: the canonical quotient map `List (α × Bool) → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.of`/`FreeAddGroup.of`: the canonical injection `α → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.lift f`/`FreeAddGroup.lift`: the canonical group homomorphism `FreeGroup α →* G`
given a group `G` and a function `f : α → G`.
## Main statements
* `FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser`/`FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser`: The Church-Rosser theorem for word
reduction (also known as Newman's diamond lemma).
* `FreeGroup.freeGroupUnitEquivInt`: The free group over the one-point type
is isomorphic to the integers.
* The free group construction is an instance of a monad.
## Implementation details
First we introduce the one step reduction relation `FreeGroup.Red.Step`:
`w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v`, its reflexive transitive closure `FreeGroup.Red.trans`
and prove that its join is an equivalence relation. Then we introduce `FreeGroup α` as a quotient
over `FreeGroup.Red.Step`.
For the additive version we introduce the same relation under a different name so that we can
distinguish the quotient types more easily.
## Tags
free group, Newman's diamond lemma, Church-Rosser theorem
-/
open Relation
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u}
attribute [local simp] List.append_eq_has_append
-- Porting note: to_additive.map_namespace is not supported yet
-- worked around it by putting a few extra manual mappings (but not too many all in all)
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `FreeGroup `FreeAddGroup
/-- Reduction step for the additive free group relation: `w + x + (-x) + v ~> w + v` -/
inductive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeAddGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
#align free_add_group.red.step FreeAddGroup.Red.Step
attribute [simp] FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not
/-- Reduction step for the multiplicative free group relation: `w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step]
inductive FreeGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
#align free_group.red.step FreeGroup.Red.Step
attribute [simp] FreeGroup.Red.Step.not
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red "Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step`"]
def Red : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop :=
ReflTransGen Red.Step
#align free_group.red FreeGroup.Red
#align free_add_group.red FreeAddGroup.Red
@[to_additive (attr := refl)]
theorem Red.refl : Red L L :=
ReflTransGen.refl
#align free_group.red.refl FreeGroup.Red.refl
#align free_add_group.red.refl FreeAddGroup.Red.refl
@[to_additive (attr := trans)]
theorem Red.trans : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₂ L₃ → Red L₁ L₃ :=
ReflTransGen.trans
#align free_group.red.trans FreeGroup.Red.trans
#align free_add_group.red.trans FreeAddGroup.Red.trans
namespace Red
/-- Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there are words
`w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃xx⁻¹w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄` -/
@[to_additive "Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there
are words `w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃ + x + (-x) + w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄`"]
theorem Step.length : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → L₂.length + 2 = L₁.length
| _, _, @Red.Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by rw [List.length_append, List.length_append]; rfl
#align free_group.red.step.length FreeGroup.Red.Step.length
#align free_add_group.red.step.length FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.length
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.not_rev {x b} : Step (L₁ ++ (x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂) := by
cases b <;> exact Step.not
#align free_group.red.step.bnot_rev FreeGroup.Red.Step.not_rev
#align free_add_group.red.step.bnot_rev FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not {x b} : Red.Step ((x, b) :: (x, !b) :: L) L :=
@Step.not _ [] _ _ _
#align free_group.red.step.cons_bnot FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_not
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_bnot FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not_rev {x b} : Red.Step ((x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L) L :=
@Red.Step.not_rev _ [] _ _ _
#align free_group.red.step.cons_bnot_rev FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_not_rev
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_bnot_rev FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_not_rev
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₂ L₃ → Step (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₁ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by rw [← List.append_assoc, ← List.append_assoc]; constructor
#align free_group.red.step.append_left FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_left
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_left FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons {x} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Red.Step (x :: L₁) (x :: L₂) :=
@Step.append_left _ [x] _ _ H
#align free_group.red.step.cons FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_right : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → Step (L₁ ++ L₃) (L₂ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by simp
#align free_group.red.step.append_right FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_right
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_right FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_right
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_nil : ¬Step [] L := by
generalize h' : [] = L'
intro h
cases' h with L₁ L₂
simp [List.nil_eq_append] at h'
#align free_group.red.not_step_nil FreeGroup.Red.not_step_nil
#align free_add_group.red.not_step_nil FreeAddGroup.Red.not_step_nil
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_left_iff {a : α} {b : Bool} :
Step ((a, b) :: L₁) L₂ ↔ (∃ L, Step L₁ L ∧ L₂ = (a, b) :: L) ∨ L₁ = (a, ! b) :: L₂ := by
constructor
· generalize hL : ((a, b) :: L₁ : List _) = L
rintro @⟨_ | ⟨p, s'⟩, e, a', b'⟩
· simp at hL
simp [*]
· simp at hL
rcases hL with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
refine Or.inl ⟨s' ++ e, Step.not, ?_⟩
simp
· rintro (⟨L, h, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact Step.cons h
· exact Step.cons_not
#align free_group.red.step.cons_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_singleton : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, ¬Step [p] L
| (a, b) => by simp [Step.cons_left_iff, not_step_nil]
#align free_group.red.not_step_singleton FreeGroup.Red.not_step_singleton
#align free_add_group.red.not_step_singleton FreeAddGroup.Red.not_step_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_cons_iff : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, Step (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [Step.cons_left_iff, iff_def, or_imp]
#align free_group.red.step.cons_cons_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_cons_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_cons_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_cons_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left_iff : ∀ L, Step (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂
| [] => by simp
| p :: l => by simp [Step.append_left_iff l, Step.cons_cons_iff]
#align free_group.red.step.append_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond_aux :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)} {x1 b1 x2 b2},
L₁ ++ (x1, b1) :: (x1, !b1) :: L₂ = L₃ ++ (x2, b2) :: (x2, !b2) :: L₄ →
L₁ ++ L₂ = L₃ ++ L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step (L₁ ++ L₂) L₅ ∧ Red.Step (L₃ ++ L₄) L₅
| [], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, [(x3, b3)], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [(x3, b3)], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; simp; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.cons_not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; simp; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.cons_not, Red.Step.not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: tl, _, (x4, b4) :: tl2, _, _, _, _, _, H =>
let ⟨H1, H2⟩ := List.cons.inj H
match Step.diamond_aux H2 with
| Or.inl H3 => Or.inl <| by simp [H1, H3]
| Or.inr ⟨L₅, H3, H4⟩ => Or.inr ⟨_, Step.cons H3, by simpa [H1] using Step.cons H4⟩
#align free_group.red.step.diamond_aux FreeGroup.Red.Step.diamond_aux
#align free_add_group.red.step.diamond_aux FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.diamond_aux
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)},
Red.Step L₁ L₃ → Red.Step L₂ L₄ → L₁ = L₂ → L₃ = L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step L₃ L₅ ∧ Red.Step L₄ L₅
| _, _, _, _, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.not, H => Step.diamond_aux H
#align free_group.red.step.diamond FreeGroup.Red.Step.diamond
#align free_add_group.red.step.diamond FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.diamond
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.to_red : Step L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₂ :=
ReflTransGen.single
#align free_group.red.step.to_red FreeGroup.Red.Step.to_red
#align free_add_group.red.step.to_red FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.to_red
/-- **Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma. -/
@[to_additive
"**Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma."]
theorem church_rosser : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₃ → Join Red L₂ L₃ :=
Relation.church_rosser fun a b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| b, c, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, hcd.to_red⟩
#align free_group.red.church_rosser FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser
#align free_add_group.red.church_rosser FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons {p} : Red L₁ L₂ → Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) :=
ReflTransGen.lift (List.cons p) fun _ _ => Step.cons
#align free_group.red.cons_cons FreeGroup.Red.cons_cons
#align free_add_group.red.cons_cons FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_cons
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons_iff (p) : Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq₁ : (p :: L₁ : List _) = LL₁
generalize eq₂ : (p :: L₂ : List _) = LL₂
intro h
induction' h using Relation.ReflTransGen.head_induction_on
with L₁ L₂ h₁₂ h ih
generalizing L₁ L₂
· subst_vars
cases eq₂
constructor
· subst_vars
cases' p with a b
rw [Step.cons_left_iff] at h₁₂
rcases h₁₂ with (⟨L, h₁₂, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact (ih rfl rfl).head h₁₂
· exact (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not_rev)
cons_cons
#align free_group.red.cons_cons_iff FreeGroup.Red.cons_cons_iff
#align free_add_group.red.cons_cons_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_cons_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append_left_iff : ∀ L, Red (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| p :: L => by simp [append_append_left_iff L, cons_cons_iff]
#align free_group.red.append_append_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.append_append_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.append_append_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.append_append_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append (h₁ : Red L₁ L₃) (h₂ : Red L₂ L₄) : Red (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₃ ++ L₄) :=
(h₁.lift (fun L => L ++ L₂) fun _ _ => Step.append_right).trans ((append_append_left_iff _).2 h₂)
#align free_group.red.append_append FreeGroup.Red.append_append
#align free_add_group.red.append_append FreeAddGroup.Red.append_append
@[to_additive]
theorem to_append_iff : Red L (L₁ ++ L₂) ↔ ∃ L₃ L₄, L = L₃ ++ L₄ ∧ Red L₃ L₁ ∧ Red L₄ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq : L₁ ++ L₂ = L₁₂
intro h
induction' h with L' L₁₂ hLL' h ih generalizing L₁ L₂
· exact ⟨_, _, eq.symm, by rfl, by rfl⟩
· cases' h with s e a b
rcases List.append_eq_append_iff.1 eq with (⟨s', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨e', rfl, rfl⟩)
· have : L₁ ++ (s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e) = L₁ ++ s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂.tail Step.not⟩
· have : s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e' ++ L₂ = s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: (e' ++ L₂) :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁.tail Step.not, h₂⟩)
fun ⟨L₃, L₄, Eq, h₃, h₄⟩ => Eq.symm ▸ append_append h₃ h₄
#align free_group.red.to_append_iff FreeGroup.Red.to_append_iff
#align free_add_group.red.to_append_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.to_append_iff
/-- The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself."]
theorem nil_iff : Red [] L ↔ L = [] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => Red.not_step_nil
#align free_group.red.nil_iff FreeGroup.Red.nil_iff
#align free_add_group.red.nil_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.nil_iff
/-- A letter only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "A letter only reduces to itself."]
theorem singleton_iff {x} : Red [x] L₁ ↔ L₁ = [x] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => not_step_singleton
#align free_group.red.singleton_iff FreeGroup.Red.singleton_iff
#align free_add_group.red.singleton_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.singleton_iff
/-- If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `xw` reduces to the empty word, then `w` reduces
to `x⁻¹` -/
@[to_additive
"If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `x + w` reduces to the empty word, then `w`
reduces to `-x`."]
theorem cons_nil_iff_singleton {x b} : Red ((x, b) :: L) [] ↔ Red L [(x, not b)] :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
have h₁ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) [(x, not b)] := cons_cons h
have h₂ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) L := ReflTransGen.single Step.cons_not_rev
let ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩ := church_rosser h₁ h₂
rw [singleton_iff] at h₁
subst L'
assumption)
fun h => (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not
#align free_group.red.cons_nil_iff_singleton FreeGroup.Red.cons_nil_iff_singleton
#align free_add_group.red.cons_nil_iff_singleton FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_nil_iff_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem red_iff_irreducible {x1 b1 x2 b2} (h : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2)) :
Red [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] L ↔ L = [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] := by
apply reflTransGen_iff_eq
generalize eq : [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] = L'
intro L h'
cases h'
simp [List.cons_eq_append, List.nil_eq_append] at eq
rcases eq with ⟨rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
simp at h
#align free_group.red.red_iff_irreducible FreeGroup.Red.red_iff_irreducible
#align free_add_group.red.red_iff_irreducible FreeAddGroup.Red.red_iff_irreducible
/-- If `x` and `y` are distinct letters and `w₁ w₂` are words such that `xw₁` reduces to `yw₂`, then
`w₁` reduces to `x⁻¹yw₂`. -/
@[to_additive "If `x` and `y` are distinct letters and `w₁ w₂` are words such that `x + w₁` reduces
to `y + w₂`, then `w₁` reduces to `-x + y + w₂`."]
theorem inv_of_red_of_ne {x1 b1 x2 b2} (H1 : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2))
(H2 : Red ((x1, b1) :: L₁) ((x2, b2) :: L₂)) : Red L₁ ((x1, not b1) :: (x2, b2) :: L₂) := by
have : Red ((x1, b1) :: L₁) ([(x2, b2)] ++ L₂) := H2
rcases to_append_iff.1 this with ⟨_ | ⟨p, L₃⟩, L₄, eq, h₁, h₂⟩
· simp [nil_iff] at h₁
· cases eq
show Red (L₃ ++ L₄) ([(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] ++ L₂)
apply append_append _ h₂
have h₁ : Red ((x1, not b1) :: (x1, b1) :: L₃) [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] := cons_cons h₁
have h₂ : Red ((x1, not b1) :: (x1, b1) :: L₃) L₃ := Step.cons_not_rev.to_red
rcases church_rosser h₁ h₂ with ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩
rw [red_iff_irreducible H1] at h₁
rwa [h₁] at h₂
#align free_group.red.inv_of_red_of_ne FreeGroup.Red.inv_of_red_of_ne
#align free_add_group.red.neg_of_red_of_ne FreeAddGroup.Red.neg_of_red_of_ne
open List -- for <+ notation
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.sublist (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Sublist L₂ L₁ := by
cases H; simp; constructor; constructor; rfl
#align free_group.red.step.sublist FreeGroup.Red.Step.sublist
#align free_add_group.red.step.sublist FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.sublist
/-- If `w₁ w₂` are words such that `w₁` reduces to `w₂`, then `w₂` is a sublist of `w₁`. -/
@[to_additive "If `w₁ w₂` are words such that `w₁` reduces to `w₂`, then `w₂` is a sublist of
`w₁`."]
protected theorem sublist : Red L₁ L₂ → L₂ <+ L₁ :=
@reflTransGen_of_transitive_reflexive
_ (fun a b => b <+ a) _ _ _
(fun l => List.Sublist.refl l)
(fun _a _b _c hab hbc => List.Sublist.trans hbc hab)
(fun _ _ => Red.Step.sublist)
#align free_group.red.sublist FreeGroup.Red.sublist
#align free_add_group.red.sublist FreeAddGroup.Red.sublist
@[to_additive]
theorem length_le (h : Red L₁ L₂) : L₂.length ≤ L₁.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
#align free_group.red.length_le FreeGroup.Red.length_le
#align free_add_group.red.length_le FreeAddGroup.Red.length_le
@[to_additive]
theorem sizeof_of_step : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)},
Step L₁ L₂ → sizeOf L₂ < sizeOf L₁
| _, _, @Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by
induction L1 with
| nil =>
-- dsimp [sizeOf]
dsimp
simp only [Bool.sizeOf_eq_one]
have H :
1 + (1 + 1) + (1 + (1 + 1) + sizeOf L2) =
sizeOf L2 + (1 + ((1 + 1) + (1 + 1) + 1)) := by
ac_rfl
rw [H]
apply Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right
apply Nat.lt_add_right
apply Nat.zero_lt_one
| cons hd tl ih =>
dsimp
exact Nat.add_lt_add_left ih _
#align free_group.red.sizeof_of_step FreeGroup.Red.sizeof_of_step
#align free_add_group.red.sizeof_of_step FreeAddGroup.Red.sizeof_of_step
@[to_additive]
theorem length (h : Red L₁ L₂) : ∃ n, L₁.length = L₂.length + 2 * n := by
induction' h with L₂ L₃ _h₁₂ h₂₃ ih
· exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
· rcases ih with ⟨n, eq⟩
exists 1 + n
simp [Nat.mul_add, eq, (Step.length h₂₃).symm, add_assoc]
#align free_group.red.length FreeGroup.Red.length
#align free_add_group.red.length FreeAddGroup.Red.length
@[to_additive]
theorem antisymm (h₁₂ : Red L₁ L₂) (h₂₁ : Red L₂ L₁) : L₁ = L₂ :=
h₂₁.sublist.antisymm h₁₂.sublist
#align free_group.red.antisymm FreeGroup.Red.antisymm
#align free_add_group.red.antisymm FreeAddGroup.Red.antisymm
end Red
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.equivalence_join_red]
theorem equivalence_join_red : Equivalence (Join (@Red α)) :=
equivalence_join_reflTransGen fun a b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| b, c, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, ReflTransGen.single hcd⟩
#align free_group.equivalence_join_red FreeGroup.equivalence_join_red
#align free_add_group.equivalence_join_red FreeAddGroup.equivalence_join_red
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.join_red_of_step]
theorem join_red_of_step (h : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
join_of_single reflexive_reflTransGen h.to_red
#align free_group.join_red_of_step FreeGroup.join_red_of_step
#align free_add_group.join_red_of_step FreeAddGroup.join_red_of_step
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.eqvGen_step_iff_join_red]
theorem eqvGen_step_iff_join_red : EqvGen Red.Step L₁ L₂ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
have : EqvGen (Join Red) L₁ L₂ := h.mono fun _ _ => join_red_of_step
equivalence_join_red.eqvGen_iff.1 this)
(join_of_equivalence (EqvGen.is_equivalence _) fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_equivalence (EqvGen.is_equivalence _) EqvGen.rel)
#align free_group.eqv_gen_step_iff_join_red FreeGroup.eqvGen_step_iff_join_red
#align free_add_group.eqv_gen_step_iff_join_red FreeAddGroup.eqvGen_step_iff_join_red
end FreeGroup
/-- The free group over a type, i.e. the words formed by the elements of the type and their formal
inverses, quotient by one step reduction. -/
@[to_additive "The free additive group over a type, i.e. the words formed by the elements of the
type and their formal inverses, quotient by one step reduction."]
def FreeGroup (α : Type u) : Type u :=
Quot <| @FreeGroup.Red.Step α
#align free_group FreeGroup
#align free_add_group FreeAddGroup
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- The canonical map from `List (α × Bool)` to the free group on `α`. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical map from `list (α × bool)` to the free additive group on `α`."]
def mk (L : List (α × Bool)) : FreeGroup α :=
Quot.mk Red.Step L
#align free_group.mk FreeGroup.mk
#align free_add_group.mk FreeAddGroup.mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk : Quot.mk Red.Step L = mk L :=
rfl
#align free_group.quot_mk_eq_mk FreeGroup.quot_mk_eq_mk
#align free_add_group.quot_mk_eq_mk FreeAddGroup.quot_mk_eq_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_lift_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → β)
(H : ∀ L₁ L₂, Red.Step L₁ L₂ → f L₁ = f L₂) : Quot.lift f H (mk L) = f L :=
rfl
#align free_group.quot_lift_mk FreeGroup.quot_lift_mk
#align free_add_group.quot_lift_mk FreeAddGroup.quot_lift_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_liftOn_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → β)
(H : ∀ L₁ L₂, Red.Step L₁ L₂ → f L₁ = f L₂) : Quot.liftOn (mk L) f H = f L :=
rfl
#align free_group.quot_lift_on_mk FreeGroup.quot_liftOn_mk
#align free_add_group.quot_lift_on_mk FreeAddGroup.quot_liftOn_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_map_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → List (β × Bool))
(H : (Red.Step ⇒ Red.Step) f f) : Quot.map f H (mk L) = mk (f L) :=
rfl
#align free_group.quot_map_mk FreeGroup.quot_map_mk
#align free_add_group.quot_map_mk FreeAddGroup.quot_map_mk
@[to_additive]
instance : One (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨mk []⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem one_eq_mk : (1 : FreeGroup α) = mk [] :=
rfl
#align free_group.one_eq_mk FreeGroup.one_eq_mk
#align free_add_group.zero_eq_mk FreeAddGroup.zero_eq_mk
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (FreeGroup α) := by unfold FreeGroup; infer_instance
@[to_additive]
instance : Mul (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨fun x y =>
Quot.liftOn x
(fun L₁ =>
Quot.liftOn y (fun L₂ => mk <| L₁ ++ L₂) fun _L₂ _L₃ H =>
Quot.sound <| Red.Step.append_left H)
fun _L₁ _L₂ H => Quot.inductionOn y fun _L₃ => Quot.sound <| Red.Step.append_right H⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_mk : mk L₁ * mk L₂ = mk (L₁ ++ L₂) :=
rfl
#align free_group.mul_mk FreeGroup.mul_mk
#align free_add_group.add_mk FreeAddGroup.add_mk
/-- Transform a word representing a free group element into a word representing its inverse. -/
@[to_additive "Transform a word representing a free group element into a word representing its
negative."]
def invRev (w : List (α × Bool)) : List (α × Bool) :=
(List.map (fun g : α × Bool => (g.1, not g.2)) w).reverse
#align free_group.inv_rev FreeGroup.invRev
#align free_add_group.neg_rev FreeAddGroup.negRev
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_length : (invRev L₁).length = L₁.length := by simp [invRev]
#align free_group.inv_rev_length FreeGroup.invRev_length
#align free_add_group.neg_rev_length FreeAddGroup.negRev_length
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_invRev : invRev (invRev L₁) = L₁ := by
simp [invRev, List.map_reverse, (· ∘ ·)]
#align free_group.inv_rev_inv_rev FreeGroup.invRev_invRev
#align free_add_group.neg_rev_neg_rev FreeAddGroup.negRev_negRev
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_empty : invRev ([] : List (α × Bool)) = [] :=
rfl
#align free_group.inv_rev_empty FreeGroup.invRev_empty
#align free_add_group.neg_rev_empty FreeAddGroup.negRev_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_involutive : Function.Involutive (@invRev α) := fun _ => invRev_invRev
#align free_group.inv_rev_involutive FreeGroup.invRev_involutive
#align free_add_group.neg_rev_involutive FreeAddGroup.negRev_involutive
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_injective : Function.Injective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.injective
#align free_group.inv_rev_injective FreeGroup.invRev_injective
#align free_add_group.neg_rev_injective FreeAddGroup.negRev_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_surjective : Function.Surjective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.surjective
#align free_group.inv_rev_surjective FreeGroup.invRev_surjective
#align free_add_group.neg_rev_surjective FreeAddGroup.negRev_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_bijective : Function.Bijective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.bijective
#align free_group.inv_rev_bijective FreeGroup.invRev_bijective
#align free_add_group.neg_rev_bijective FreeAddGroup.negRev_bijective
@[to_additive]
instance : Inv (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨Quot.map invRev
(by
intro a b h
cases h
simp [invRev])⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mk : (mk L)⁻¹ = mk (invRev L) :=
rfl
#align free_group.inv_mk FreeGroup.inv_mk
#align free_add_group.neg_mk FreeAddGroup.neg_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.Step.invRev {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)} (h : Red.Step L₁ L₂) :
Red.Step (FreeGroup.invRev L₁) (FreeGroup.invRev L₂) := by
cases' h with a b x y
simp [FreeGroup.invRev]
#align free_group.red.step.inv_rev FreeGroup.Red.Step.invRev
#align free_add_group.red.step.neg_rev FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.negRev
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.invRev {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)} (h : Red L₁ L₂) : Red (invRev L₁) (invRev L₂) :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.lift _ (fun _a _b => Red.Step.invRev) h
#align free_group.red.inv_rev FreeGroup.Red.invRev
#align free_add_group.red.neg_rev FreeAddGroup.Red.negRev
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Red.step_invRev_iff :
Red.Step (FreeGroup.invRev L₁) (FreeGroup.invRev L₂) ↔ Red.Step L₁ L₂ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [invRev_invRev] using h.invRev, fun h => h.invRev⟩
#align free_group.red.step_inv_rev_iff FreeGroup.Red.step_invRev_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step_neg_rev_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.step_negRev_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem red_invRev_iff : Red (invRev L₁) (invRev L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [invRev_invRev] using h.invRev, fun h => h.invRev⟩
#align free_group.red_inv_rev_iff FreeGroup.red_invRev_iff
#align free_add_group.red_neg_rev_iff FreeAddGroup.red_negRev_iff
@[to_additive]
instance : Group (FreeGroup α) where
mul := (· * ·)
one := 1
inv := Inv.inv
mul_assoc := by rintro ⟨L₁⟩ ⟨L₂⟩ ⟨L₃⟩; simp
one_mul := by rintro ⟨L⟩; rfl
mul_one := by rintro ⟨L⟩; simp [one_eq_mk]
mul_left_inv := by
rintro ⟨L⟩
exact
List.recOn L rfl fun ⟨x, b⟩ tl ih =>
Eq.trans (Quot.sound <| by simp [invRev, one_eq_mk]) ih
/-- `of` is the canonical injection from the type to the free group over that type by sending each
element to the equivalence class of the letter that is the element. -/
@[to_additive "`of` is the canonical injection from the type to the free group over that type
by sending each element to the equivalence class of the letter that is the element."]
def of (x : α) : FreeGroup α :=
mk [(x, true)]
#align free_group.of FreeGroup.of
#align free_add_group.of FreeAddGroup.of
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.exact : mk L₁ = mk L₂ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
calc
mk L₁ = mk L₂ ↔ EqvGen Red.Step L₁ L₂ := Iff.intro (Quot.exact _) Quot.EqvGen_sound
_ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ := eqvGen_step_iff_join_red
#align free_group.red.exact FreeGroup.Red.exact
#align free_add_group.red.exact FreeAddGroup.Red.exact
/-- The canonical map from the type to the free group is an injection. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical map from the type to the additive free group is an injection."]
theorem of_injective : Function.Injective (@of α) := fun _ _ H => by
let ⟨L₁, hx, hy⟩ := Red.exact.1 H
simp [Red.singleton_iff] at hx hy; aesop
#align free_group.of_injective FreeGroup.of_injective
#align free_add_group.of_injective FreeAddGroup.of_injective
section lift
variable {β : Type v} [Group β] (f : α → β) {x y : FreeGroup α}
/-- Given `f : α → β` with `β` a group, the canonical map `List (α × Bool) → β` -/
@[to_additive "Given `f : α → β` with `β` an additive group, the canonical map
`list (α × bool) → β`"]
def Lift.aux : List (α × Bool) → β := fun L =>
List.prod <| L.map fun x => cond x.2 (f x.1) (f x.1)⁻¹
#align free_group.lift.aux FreeGroup.Lift.aux
#align free_add_group.lift.aux FreeAddGroup.Lift.aux
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.Step.lift {f : α → β} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Lift.aux f L₁ = Lift.aux f L₂ := by
cases' H with _ _ _ b; cases b <;> simp [Lift.aux]
#align free_group.red.step.lift FreeGroup.Red.Step.lift
#align free_add_group.red.step.lift FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.lift
/-- If `β` is a group, then any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to a group homomorphism
from the free group over `α` to `β` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps symm_apply)
"If `β` is an additive group, then any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to an
additive group homomorphism from the free additive group over `α` to `β`"]
def lift : (α → β) ≃ (FreeGroup α →* β) where
toFun f :=
MonoidHom.mk' (Quot.lift (Lift.aux f) fun L₁ L₂ => Red.Step.lift) <| by
rintro ⟨L₁⟩ ⟨L₂⟩; simp [Lift.aux]
invFun g := g ∘ of
left_inv f := one_mul _
right_inv g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| by
rintro ⟨L⟩
exact List.recOn L
(g.map_one.symm)
(by
rintro ⟨x, _ | _⟩ t (ih : _ = g (mk t))
· show _ = g ((of x)⁻¹ * mk t)
simpa [Lift.aux] using ih
· show _ = g (of x * mk t)
simpa [Lift.aux] using ih)
#align free_group.lift FreeGroup.lift
#align free_add_group.lift FreeAddGroup.lift
#align free_group.lift_symm_apply FreeGroup.lift_symm_apply
#align free_add_group.lift_symm_apply FreeAddGroup.lift_symm_apply
variable {f}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift.mk : lift f (mk L) = List.prod (L.map fun x => cond x.2 (f x.1) (f x.1)⁻¹) :=
rfl
#align free_group.lift.mk FreeGroup.lift.mk
#align free_add_group.lift.mk FreeAddGroup.lift.mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift.of {x} : lift f (of x) = f x :=
one_mul _
#align free_group.lift.of FreeGroup.lift.of
#align free_add_group.lift.of FreeAddGroup.lift.of
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.unique (g : FreeGroup α →* β) (hg : ∀ x, g (FreeGroup.of x) = f x) {x} :
g x = FreeGroup.lift f x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_eq.mp (funext hg : g ∘ FreeGroup.of = f)) x
#align free_group.lift.unique FreeGroup.lift.unique
#align free_add_group.lift.unique FreeAddGroup.lift.unique
/-- Two homomorphisms out of a free group are equal if they are equal on generators.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two homomorphisms out of a free additive group are equal if they are
equal on generators. See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]."]
theorem ext_hom {G : Type*} [Group G] (f g : FreeGroup α →* G) (h : ∀ a, f (of a) = g (of a)) :
f = g :=
lift.symm.injective <| funext h
#align free_group.ext_hom FreeGroup.ext_hom
#align free_add_group.ext_hom FreeAddGroup.ext_hom
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_of_eq_id (α) : lift of = MonoidHom.id (FreeGroup α) :=
lift.apply_symm_apply (MonoidHom.id _)
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.of_eq (x : FreeGroup α) : lift FreeGroup.of x = x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_of_eq_id α) x
#align free_group.lift.of_eq FreeGroup.lift.of_eq
#align free_add_group.lift.of_eq FreeAddGroup.lift.of_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.range_le {s : Subgroup β} (H : Set.range f ⊆ s) : (lift f).range ≤ s := by
rintro _ ⟨⟨L⟩, rfl⟩;
exact
List.recOn L s.one_mem fun ⟨x, b⟩ tl ih =>
Bool.recOn b (by simp at ih ⊢; exact s.mul_mem (s.inv_mem <| H ⟨x, rfl⟩) ih)
(by simp at ih ⊢; exact s.mul_mem (H ⟨x, rfl⟩) ih)
#align free_group.lift.range_le FreeGroup.lift.range_le
#align free_add_group.lift.range_le FreeAddGroup.lift.range_le
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeGroup/Basic.lean | 776 | 780 | theorem lift.range_eq_closure : (lift f).range = Subgroup.closure (Set.range f) := by |
apply le_antisymm (lift.range_le Subgroup.subset_closure)
rw [Subgroup.closure_le]
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨FreeGroup.of a, by simp only [lift.of]⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Antoine Chambert-Loir and María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir, María Inés de Frutos-Fernández, Eric Wieser, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Basic
/-!
# Partial HasAntidiagonal for functions with finite support
For an `AddCommMonoid` `μ`,
`Finset.HasAntidiagonal μ` provides a function `antidiagonal : μ → Finset (μ × μ)`
which maps `n : μ` to a `Finset` of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a + b = n`.
In this file, we provide an analogous definition for `ι →₀ μ`,
with an explicit finiteness condition on the support,
assuming `AddCommMonoid μ`, `HasAntidiagonal μ`,
For computability reasons, we also need `DecidableEq ι` and `DecidableEq μ`.
This Finset could be viewed inside `ι → μ`,
but the `Finsupp` condition provides a natural `DecidableEq` instance.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.finsuppAntidiag s n` is the finite set of all functions `f : ι →₀ μ`
with finite support contained in `s` and such that the sum of its values equals `n : μ`
That condition is expressed by `Finset.mem_finsuppAntidiag`
* `Finset.mem_finsuppAntidiag'` rewrites the `Finsupp.sum` condition as a `Finset.sum`.
* `Finset.finAntidiagonal`, a more general case of `Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple`
(TODO: deduplicate).
-/
namespace Finset
variable {ι μ μ' : Type*}
open Function Finsupp
section Fin
variable [AddCommMonoid μ] [DecidableEq μ] [HasAntidiagonal μ]
/-- `finAntidiagonal d n` is the type of `d`-tuples with sum `n`.
TODO: deduplicate with the less general `Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple`. -/
def finAntidiagonal (d : ℕ) (n : μ) : Finset (Fin d → μ) :=
aux d n
where
/-- Auxiliary construction for `finAntidiagonal` that bundles a proof of lawfulness
(`mem_finAntidiagonal`), as this is needed to invoke `disjiUnion`. Using `Finset.disjiUnion` makes
this computationally much more efficient than using `Finset.biUnion`. -/
aux (d : ℕ) (n : μ) : {s : Finset (Fin d → μ) // ∀ f, f ∈ s ↔ ∑ i, f i = n} :=
match d with
| 0 =>
if h : n = 0 then
⟨{0}, by simp [h, Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim ![]]⟩
else
⟨∅, by simp [Ne.symm h]⟩
| d + 1 =>
{ val := (antidiagonal n).disjiUnion
(fun ab => (aux d ab.2).1.map {
toFun := Fin.cons (ab.1)
inj' := Fin.cons_right_injective _ })
(fun i _hi j _hj hij => Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun t hti htj => hij <| by
simp_rw [Finset.mem_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk] at hti htj
obtain ⟨ai, hai, hij'⟩ := hti
obtain ⟨aj, haj, rfl⟩ := htj
rw [Fin.cons_eq_cons] at hij'
ext
· exact hij'.1
· obtain ⟨-, rfl⟩ := hij'
rw [← (aux d i.2).prop ai |>.mp hai, ← (aux d j.2).prop ai |>.mp haj])
property := fun f => by
simp_rw [mem_disjiUnion, mem_antidiagonal, mem_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk, Prod.exists,
(aux d _).prop, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, rfl, g, rfl, rfl⟩
simp only [Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ]
· intro hf
exact ⟨_, _, hf, _, rfl, Fin.cons_self_tail f⟩ }
lemma mem_finAntidiagonal (d : ℕ) (n : μ) (f : Fin d → μ) :
f ∈ finAntidiagonal d n ↔ ∑ i, f i = n :=
(finAntidiagonal.aux d n).prop f
/-- `finAntidiagonal₀ d n` is the type of d-tuples with sum `n` -/
def finAntidiagonal₀ (d : ℕ) (n : μ) : Finset (Fin d →₀ μ) :=
(finAntidiagonal d n).map
{ toFun := fun f =>
-- this is `Finsupp.onFinset`, but computable
{ toFun := f, support := univ.filter (f · ≠ 0), mem_support_toFun := fun x => by simp }
inj' := fun _ _ h => DFunLike.coe_fn_eq.mpr h }
lemma mem_finAntidiagonal₀' (d : ℕ) (n : μ) (f : Fin d →₀ μ) :
f ∈ finAntidiagonal₀ d n ↔ ∑ i, f i = n := by
simp only [finAntidiagonal₀, mem_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk, ← mem_finAntidiagonal,
← DFunLike.coe_injective.eq_iff, Finsupp.coe_mk, exists_eq_right]
lemma mem_finAntidiagonal₀ (d : ℕ) (n : μ) (f : Fin d →₀ μ) :
f ∈ finAntidiagonal₀ d n ↔ sum f (fun _ x => x) = n := by
rw [mem_finAntidiagonal₀', sum_of_support_subset f (subset_univ _) _ (fun _ _ => rfl)]
end Fin
section finsuppAntidiag
variable [DecidableEq ι]
variable [AddCommMonoid μ] [HasAntidiagonal μ] [DecidableEq μ]
/-- The Finset of functions `ι →₀ μ` with support contained in `s` and sum `n`. -/
def finsuppAntidiag (s : Finset ι) (n : μ) : Finset (ι →₀ μ) :=
let x : Finset (s →₀ μ) :=
-- any ordering of elements of `s` will do, the result is the same
(Fintype.truncEquivFinOfCardEq <| Fintype.card_coe s).lift
(fun e => (finAntidiagonal₀ s.card n).map (equivCongrLeft e.symm).toEmbedding)
(fun e1 e2 => Finset.ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_map_equiv, equivCongrLeft_symm, Equiv.symm_symm, equivCongrLeft_apply,
mem_finAntidiagonal₀, sum_equivMapDomain])
x.map
⟨Finsupp.extendDomain, Function.LeftInverse.injective subtypeDomain_extendDomain⟩
/-- A function belongs to `finsuppAntidiag s n`
iff its support is contained in `s` and the sum of its components is equal to `n` -/
lemma mem_finsuppAntidiag {s : Finset ι} {n : μ} {f : ι →₀ μ} :
f ∈ finsuppAntidiag s n ↔ f.support ⊆ s ∧ Finsupp.sum f (fun _ x => x) = n := by
simp only [finsuppAntidiag, mem_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk, mem_finAntidiagonal₀]
induction' (Fintype.truncEquivFinOfCardEq <| Fintype.card_coe s) using Trunc.ind with e'
simp_rw [Trunc.lift_mk, mem_map_equiv, equivCongrLeft_symm, Equiv.symm_symm, equivCongrLeft_apply,
mem_finAntidiagonal₀, sum_equivMapDomain]
constructor
· rintro ⟨f, rfl, rfl⟩
dsimp [sum]
constructor
· exact Finset.coe_subset.mpr (support_extendDomain_subset _)
· simp
· rintro ⟨hsupp, rfl⟩
refine (Function.RightInverse.surjective subtypeDomain_extendDomain).exists.mpr ⟨f, ?_⟩
constructor
· simp_rw [sum, support_subtypeDomain, subtypeDomain_apply, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hsupp]
· rw [extendDomain_subtypeDomain _ hsupp]
end finsuppAntidiag
section
variable [DecidableEq ι]
variable [AddCommMonoid μ] [HasAntidiagonal μ] [DecidableEq μ]
variable [AddCommMonoid μ'] [HasAntidiagonal μ'] [DecidableEq μ']
lemma mem_finsuppAntidiag' (s : Finset ι) (n : μ) (f) :
f ∈ finsuppAntidiag s n ↔ f.support ⊆ s ∧ s.sum f = n := by
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hs
rw [sum_of_support_subset _ hs]
exact fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem finsuppAntidiag_empty_zero :
finsuppAntidiag (∅ : Finset ι) (0 : μ) = {0} := by
ext f
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag]
simp only [mem_singleton, subset_empty]
rw [support_eq_empty, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
intro hf
rw [hf, sum_zero_index]
theorem finsuppAntidiag_empty_of_ne_zero {n : μ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
finsuppAntidiag (∅ : Finset ι) n = ∅ := by
ext f
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag]
simp only [subset_empty, support_eq_empty, sum_empty,
not_mem_empty, iff_false, not_and]
intro hf
rw [hf, sum_zero_index]
exact Ne.symm hn
theorem finsuppAntidiag_empty [DecidableEq μ] (n : μ) :
finsuppAntidiag (∅ : Finset ι) n = if n = 0 then {0} else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hn
· rw [hn]
apply finsuppAntidiag_empty_zero
· apply finsuppAntidiag_empty_of_ne_zero hn
theorem mem_finsuppAntidiag_insert [DecidableEq ι] {a : ι} {s : Finset ι}
(h : a ∉ s) (n : μ) {f : ι →₀ μ} :
f ∈ finsuppAntidiag (insert a s) n ↔
∃ m ∈ antidiagonal n, ∃ (g : ι →₀ μ),
f = Finsupp.update g a m.1 ∧ g ∈ finsuppAntidiag s m.2 := by
simp only [mem_finsuppAntidiag', mem_antidiagonal, Prod.exists, sum_insert h]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hsupp, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, Finsupp.erase a f, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [update_erase_eq_update, update_self]
· rwa [support_erase, ← subset_insert_iff]
· apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [Finsupp.erase_ne (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h)]
· rintro ⟨n1, n2, rfl, g, rfl, hgsupp, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact (support_update_subset _ _).trans (insert_subset_insert a hgsupp)
· simp only [coe_update]
apply congr_arg₂
· rw [update_same]
· apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [update_noteq (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h) n1 ⇑g]
theorem finsuppAntidiag_insert [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq μ] {a : ι} {s : Finset ι}
(h : a ∉ s) (n : μ) :
finsuppAntidiag (insert a s) n = (antidiagonal n).biUnion
(fun p : μ × μ =>
(finsuppAntidiag s p.snd).attach.map
⟨fun f => Finsupp.update f.val a p.fst,
(fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ hfg => Subtype.ext <| by
simp only [mem_val, mem_finsuppAntidiag] at hf hg
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff] at hfg ⊢
intro x
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x a
· replace hf := mt (hf.1 ·) h
replace hg := mt (hg.1 ·) h
rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp hf, not_mem_support_iff.mp hg]
· simpa only [coe_update, Function.update, dif_neg hx] using hfg x)⟩) := by
ext f
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag_insert h, mem_biUnion]
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists, Embedding.coeFn_mk, exists_prop, and_comm,
eq_comm]
-- This should work under the assumption that e is an embedding and an AddHom
lemma mapRange_finsuppAntidiag_subset {e : μ ≃+ μ'} {s : Finset ι} {n : μ} :
(finsuppAntidiag s n).map (mapRange.addEquiv e).toEmbedding ⊆ finsuppAntidiag s (e n) := by
intro f
simp only [mem_map, mem_finsuppAntidiag]
rintro ⟨g, ⟨hsupp, hsum⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [AddEquiv.toEquiv_eq_coe, mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding,
mapRange.equiv_apply, EquivLike.coe_coe]
constructor
· exact subset_trans (support_mapRange) hsupp
· rw [sum_mapRange_index (fun _ => rfl), ← hsum, _root_.map_finsupp_sum]
lemma mapRange_finsuppAntidiag_eq {e : μ ≃+ μ'} {s : Finset ι} {n : μ} :
(finsuppAntidiag s n).map (mapRange.addEquiv e).toEmbedding = finsuppAntidiag s (e n) := by
ext f
constructor
· apply mapRange_finsuppAntidiag_subset
· set h := (mapRange.addEquiv e).toEquiv with hh
intro hf
have : n = e.symm (e n) := (AddEquiv.eq_symm_apply e).mpr rfl
rw [mem_map_equiv, this]
apply mapRange_finsuppAntidiag_subset
rw [← mem_map_equiv]
convert hf
rw [map_map, hh]
convert map_refl
apply Function.Embedding.equiv_symm_toEmbedding_trans_toEmbedding
end
section CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [DecidableEq ι]
variable [CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid μ] [HasAntidiagonal μ] [DecidableEq μ]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/PiAntidiagonal.lean | 265 | 270 | theorem finsuppAntidiag_zero (s : Finset ι) :
finsuppAntidiag s (0 : μ) = {(0 : ι →₀ μ)} := by |
ext f
simp_rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag', mem_singleton, sum_eq_zero_iff, Finset.subset_iff,
mem_support_iff, not_imp_comm, ← forall_and, ← or_imp, DFunLike.ext_iff, zero_apply, or_comm,
or_not, true_imp_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alex Kontorovich and Heather Macbeth and Marc Masdeu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth, Marc Masdeu
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Parity
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
#align_import analysis.complex.upper_half_plane.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"34d3797325d202bd7250431275bb871133cdb611"
/-!
# The upper half plane and its automorphisms
This file defines `UpperHalfPlane` to be the upper half plane in `ℂ`.
We furthermore equip it with the structure of a `GLPos 2 ℝ` action by
fractional linear transformations.
We define the notation `ℍ` for the upper half plane available in the locale
`UpperHalfPlane` so as not to conflict with the quaternions.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Matrix Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup
open scoped Classical MatrixGroups
/- Disable these instances as they are not the simp-normal form, and having them disabled ensures
we state lemmas in this file without spurious `coe_fn` terms. -/
attribute [-instance] Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup.instCoeFun
attribute [-instance] Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.instCoeFun
local notation "GL(" n ", " R ")" "⁺" => Matrix.GLPos (Fin n) R
local notation:1024 "↑ₘ" A:1024 =>
(((A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) : GL (Fin 2) ℝ) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) _)
local notation:1024 "↑ₘ[" R "]" A:1024 =>
((A : GL (Fin 2) R) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R)
/-- The open upper half plane -/
def UpperHalfPlane :=
{ point : ℂ // 0 < point.im }
#align upper_half_plane UpperHalfPlane
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UpperHalfPlane] notation "ℍ" => UpperHalfPlane
open UpperHalfPlane
namespace UpperHalfPlane
/-- Canonical embedding of the upper half-plane into `ℂ`. -/
@[coe] protected def coe (z : ℍ) : ℂ := z.1
-- Porting note: added to replace `deriving`
instance : CoeOut ℍ ℂ := ⟨UpperHalfPlane.coe⟩
instance : Inhabited ℍ :=
⟨⟨Complex.I, by simp⟩⟩
@[ext] theorem ext {a b : ℍ} (h : (a : ℂ) = b) : a = b := Subtype.eq h
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ext_iff {a b : ℍ} : (a : ℂ) = b ↔ a = b := Subtype.coe_inj
instance canLift : CanLift ℂ ℍ ((↑) : ℍ → ℂ) fun z => 0 < z.im :=
Subtype.canLift fun (z : ℂ) => 0 < z.im
#align upper_half_plane.can_lift UpperHalfPlane.canLift
/-- Imaginary part -/
def im (z : ℍ) :=
(z : ℂ).im
#align upper_half_plane.im UpperHalfPlane.im
/-- Real part -/
def re (z : ℍ) :=
(z : ℂ).re
#align upper_half_plane.re UpperHalfPlane.re
/-- Extensionality lemma in terms of `UpperHalfPlane.re` and `UpperHalfPlane.im`. -/
theorem ext' {a b : ℍ} (hre : a.re = b.re) (him : a.im = b.im) : a = b :=
ext <| Complex.ext hre him
/-- Constructor for `UpperHalfPlane`. It is useful if `⟨z, h⟩` makes Lean use a wrong
typeclass instance. -/
def mk (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : ℍ :=
⟨z, h⟩
#align upper_half_plane.mk UpperHalfPlane.mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_im (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ).im = z.im :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.coe_im UpperHalfPlane.coe_im
@[simp]
theorem coe_re (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ).re = z.re :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.coe_re UpperHalfPlane.coe_re
@[simp]
theorem mk_re (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h).re = z.re :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.mk_re UpperHalfPlane.mk_re
@[simp]
theorem mk_im (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h).im = z.im :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.mk_im UpperHalfPlane.mk_im
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h : ℂ) = z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.coe_mk UpperHalfPlane.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (z : ℍ) (h : 0 < (z : ℂ).im := z.2) : mk z h = z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.mk_coe UpperHalfPlane.mk_coe
theorem re_add_im (z : ℍ) : (z.re + z.im * Complex.I : ℂ) = z :=
Complex.re_add_im z
#align upper_half_plane.re_add_im UpperHalfPlane.re_add_im
theorem im_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < z.im :=
z.2
#align upper_half_plane.im_pos UpperHalfPlane.im_pos
theorem im_ne_zero (z : ℍ) : z.im ≠ 0 :=
z.im_pos.ne'
#align upper_half_plane.im_ne_zero UpperHalfPlane.im_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
mt (congr_arg Complex.im) z.im_ne_zero
#align upper_half_plane.ne_zero UpperHalfPlane.ne_zero
/-- Define I := √-1 as an element on the upper half plane. -/
def I : ℍ := ⟨Complex.I, by simp⟩
@[simp]
lemma I_im : I.im = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma I_re : I.re = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_I : I = Complex.I := rfl
end UpperHalfPlane
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `UpperHalfPlane.im`. -/
@[positivity UpperHalfPlane.im _]
def evalUpperHalfPlaneIm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(UpperHalfPlane.im $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(@UpperHalfPlane.im_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not UpperHalfPlane.im"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `UpperHalfPlane.coe`. -/
@[positivity UpperHalfPlane.coe _]
def evalUpperHalfPlaneCoe : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℂ), ~q(UpperHalfPlane.coe $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonzero q(@UpperHalfPlane.ne_zero $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not UpperHalfPlane.coe"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace UpperHalfPlane
theorem normSq_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < Complex.normSq (z : ℂ) := by
rw [Complex.normSq_pos]; exact z.ne_zero
#align upper_half_plane.norm_sq_pos UpperHalfPlane.normSq_pos
theorem normSq_ne_zero (z : ℍ) : Complex.normSq (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
(normSq_pos z).ne'
#align upper_half_plane.norm_sq_ne_zero UpperHalfPlane.normSq_ne_zero
theorem im_inv_neg_coe_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < (-z : ℂ)⁻¹.im := by
simpa using div_pos z.property (normSq_pos z)
#align upper_half_plane.im_inv_neg_coe_pos UpperHalfPlane.im_inv_neg_coe_pos
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]` because it broke `field_simp` calls below.
/-- Numerator of the formula for a fractional linear transformation -/
def num (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ :=
(↑ₘg 0 0 : ℝ) * z + (↑ₘg 0 1 : ℝ)
#align upper_half_plane.num UpperHalfPlane.num
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]` because it broke `field_simp` calls below.
/-- Denominator of the formula for a fractional linear transformation -/
def denom (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ :=
(↑ₘg 1 0 : ℝ) * z + (↑ₘg 1 1 : ℝ)
#align upper_half_plane.denom UpperHalfPlane.denom
theorem linear_ne_zero (cd : Fin 2 → ℝ) (z : ℍ) (h : cd ≠ 0) : (cd 0 : ℂ) * z + cd 1 ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h
have : cd 0 = 0 := by
-- we will need this twice
apply_fun Complex.im at h
simpa only [z.im_ne_zero, Complex.add_im, add_zero, coe_im, zero_mul, or_false_iff,
Complex.ofReal_im, Complex.zero_im, Complex.mul_im, mul_eq_zero] using h
simp only [this, zero_mul, Complex.ofReal_zero, zero_add, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
at h
ext i
fin_cases i <;> assumption
#align upper_half_plane.linear_ne_zero UpperHalfPlane.linear_ne_zero
theorem denom_ne_zero (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : denom g z ≠ 0 := by
intro H
have DET := (mem_glpos _).1 g.prop
have hz := z.prop
simp only [GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply] at DET
have H1 : (↑ₘg 1 0 : ℝ) = 0 ∨ z.im = 0 := by simpa [num, denom] using congr_arg Complex.im H
cases' H1 with H1
· simp only [H1, Complex.ofReal_zero, denom, zero_mul, zero_add,
Complex.ofReal_eq_zero] at H
rw [Matrix.det_fin_two (↑ₘg : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ)] at DET
simp only [H, H1, mul_zero, sub_zero, lt_self_iff_false] at DET
· change z.im > 0 at hz
linarith
#align upper_half_plane.denom_ne_zero UpperHalfPlane.denom_ne_zero
theorem normSq_denom_pos (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : 0 < Complex.normSq (denom g z) :=
Complex.normSq_pos.mpr (denom_ne_zero g z)
#align upper_half_plane.norm_sq_denom_pos UpperHalfPlane.normSq_denom_pos
theorem normSq_denom_ne_zero (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : Complex.normSq (denom g z) ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (normSq_denom_pos g z)
#align upper_half_plane.norm_sq_denom_ne_zero UpperHalfPlane.normSq_denom_ne_zero
/-- Fractional linear transformation, also known as the Moebius transformation -/
def smulAux' (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ :=
num g z / denom g z
#align upper_half_plane.smul_aux' UpperHalfPlane.smulAux'
#adaptation_note /-- after v4.7.0-rc1, there is a performance problem in `field_simp`.
(Part of the code was ignoring the `maxDischargeDepth` setting:
now that we have to increase it, other paths become slow.) -/
set_option maxHeartbeats 400000 in
theorem smulAux'_im (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
(smulAux' g z).im = det ↑ₘg * z.im / Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by
rw [smulAux', Complex.div_im]
field_simp [smulAux', num, denom]
-- Porting note: the local notation still didn't work here
rw [Matrix.det_fin_two ((g : GL (Fin 2) ℝ) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ)]
ring
#align upper_half_plane.smul_aux'_im UpperHalfPlane.smulAux'_im
/-- Fractional linear transformation, also known as the Moebius transformation -/
def smulAux (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℍ :=
mk (smulAux' g z) <| by
rw [smulAux'_im]
convert mul_pos ((mem_glpos _).1 g.prop)
(div_pos z.im_pos (Complex.normSq_pos.mpr (denom_ne_zero g z))) using 1
simp only [GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply]
ring
#align upper_half_plane.smul_aux UpperHalfPlane.smulAux
theorem denom_cocycle (x y : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
denom (x * y) z = denom x (smulAux y z) * denom y z := by
change _ = (_ * (_ / _) + _) * _
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [Matrix.mul_apply, dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, denom, num, Subgroup.coe_mul,
GeneralLinearGroup.coe_mul, Fintype.univ_ofSubsingleton, Fin.mk_zero, Finset.sum_singleton,
Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
#align upper_half_plane.denom_cocycle UpperHalfPlane.denom_cocycle
theorem mul_smul' (x y : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : smulAux (x * y) z = smulAux x (smulAux y z) := by
ext1
-- Porting note: was `change _ / _ = (_ * (_ / _) + _) * _`
change _ / _ = (_ * (_ / _) + _) / _
rw [denom_cocycle]
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [Matrix.mul_apply, dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, num, denom, Subgroup.coe_mul,
GeneralLinearGroup.coe_mul, Fintype.univ_ofSubsingleton, Fin.mk_zero, Finset.sum_singleton,
Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
#align upper_half_plane.mul_smul' UpperHalfPlane.mul_smul'
/-- The action of `GLPos 2 ℝ` on the upper half-plane by fractional linear transformations. -/
instance : MulAction GL(2, ℝ)⁺ ℍ where
smul := smulAux
one_smul z := by
ext1
change _ / _ = _
simp [num, denom]
mul_smul := mul_smul'
section ModularScalarTowers
instance SLAction {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R ℝ] : MulAction SL(2, R) ℍ :=
MulAction.compHom ℍ <| SpecialLinearGroup.toGLPos.comp <| map (algebraMap R ℝ)
#align upper_half_plane.SL_action UpperHalfPlane.SLAction
namespace ModularGroup
variable (Γ : Subgroup (SpecialLinearGroup (Fin 2) ℤ))
/-- Canonical embedding of `SL(2, ℤ)` into `GL(2, ℝ)⁺`. -/
@[coe]
def coe' : SL(2, ℤ) → GL(2, ℝ)⁺ := fun g => ((g : SL(2, ℝ)) : GL(2, ℝ)⁺)
instance : Coe SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ :=
⟨coe'⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe'_apply_complex {g : SL(2, ℤ)} {i j : Fin 2} :
(Units.val <| Subtype.val <| coe' g) i j = (Subtype.val g i j : ℂ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem det_coe' {g : SL(2, ℤ)} : det (Units.val <| Subtype.val <| coe' g) = 1 := by
simp only [SpecialLinearGroup.coe_GLPos_coe_GL_coe_matrix, SpecialLinearGroup.det_coe, coe']
instance SLOnGLPos : SMul SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ :=
⟨fun s g => s * g⟩
#align upper_half_plane.SL_on_GL_pos UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.SLOnGLPos
theorem SLOnGLPos_smul_apply (s : SL(2, ℤ)) (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
(s • g) • z = ((s : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) * g) • z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.SL_on_GL_pos_smul_apply UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.SLOnGLPos_smul_apply
instance SL_to_GL_tower : IsScalarTower SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ ℍ where
smul_assoc := by
intro s g z
simp only [SLOnGLPos_smul_apply]
apply mul_smul'
#align upper_half_plane.SL_to_GL_tower UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.SL_to_GL_tower
instance subgroupGLPos : SMul Γ GL(2, ℝ)⁺ :=
⟨fun s g => s * g⟩
#align upper_half_plane.subgroup_GL_pos UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.subgroupGLPos
theorem subgroup_on_glpos_smul_apply (s : Γ) (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
(s • g) • z = ((s : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) * g) • z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.subgroup_on_GL_pos_smul_apply UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.subgroup_on_glpos_smul_apply
instance subgroup_on_glpos : IsScalarTower Γ GL(2, ℝ)⁺ ℍ where
smul_assoc := by
intro s g z
simp only [subgroup_on_glpos_smul_apply]
apply mul_smul'
#align upper_half_plane.subgroup_on_GL_pos UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.subgroup_on_glpos
instance subgroupSL : SMul Γ SL(2, ℤ) :=
⟨fun s g => s * g⟩
#align upper_half_plane.subgroup_SL UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.subgroupSL
theorem subgroup_on_SL_apply (s : Γ) (g : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ) :
(s • g) • z = ((s : SL(2, ℤ)) * g) • z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.subgroup_on_SL_apply UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.subgroup_on_SL_apply
instance subgroup_to_SL_tower : IsScalarTower Γ SL(2, ℤ) ℍ where
smul_assoc s g z := by
rw [subgroup_on_SL_apply]
apply MulAction.mul_smul
#align upper_half_plane.subgroup_to_SL_tower UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.subgroup_to_SL_tower
end ModularGroup
end ModularScalarTowers
-- Porting note: in the statement, we used to have coercions `↑· : ℝ`
-- rather than `algebraMap R ℝ ·`.
theorem specialLinearGroup_apply {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R ℝ] (g : SL(2, R)) (z : ℍ) :
g • z =
mk
(((algebraMap R ℝ (↑ₘ[R] g 0 0) : ℂ) * z + (algebraMap R ℝ (↑ₘ[R] g 0 1) : ℂ)) /
((algebraMap R ℝ (↑ₘ[R] g 1 0) : ℂ) * z + (algebraMap R ℝ (↑ₘ[R] g 1 1) : ℂ)))
(g • z).property :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.special_linear_group_apply UpperHalfPlane.specialLinearGroup_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ↑(g • z) = num g z / denom g z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.coe_smul UpperHalfPlane.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem re_smul (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : (g • z).re = (num g z / denom g z).re :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.re_smul UpperHalfPlane.re_smul
theorem im_smul (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : (g • z).im = (num g z / denom g z).im :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.im_smul UpperHalfPlane.im_smul
theorem im_smul_eq_div_normSq (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
(g • z).im = det ↑ₘg * z.im / Complex.normSq (denom g z) :=
smulAux'_im g z
#align upper_half_plane.im_smul_eq_div_norm_sq UpperHalfPlane.im_smul_eq_div_normSq
theorem c_mul_im_sq_le_normSq_denom (z : ℍ) (g : SL(2, ℝ)) :
((↑ₘg 1 0 : ℝ) * z.im) ^ 2 ≤ Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by
let c := (↑ₘg 1 0 : ℝ)
let d := (↑ₘg 1 1 : ℝ)
calc
(c * z.im) ^ 2 ≤ (c * z.im) ^ 2 + (c * z.re + d) ^ 2 := by nlinarith
_ = Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by dsimp [c, d, denom, Complex.normSq]; ring
#align upper_half_plane.c_mul_im_sq_le_norm_sq_denom UpperHalfPlane.c_mul_im_sq_le_normSq_denom
@[simp]
theorem neg_smul (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : -g • z = g • z := by
ext1
change _ / _ = _ / _
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [num, denom, Complex.ofReal_neg, neg_mul, GLPos.coe_neg_GL, Units.val_neg, neg_apply]
ring_nf
#align upper_half_plane.neg_smul UpperHalfPlane.neg_smul
section SLModularAction
namespace ModularGroup
variable (g : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ) (Γ : Subgroup SL(2, ℤ))
@[simp]
theorem sl_moeb (A : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ) : A • z = (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) • z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.sl_moeb UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.sl_moeb
theorem subgroup_moeb (A : Γ) (z : ℍ) : A • z = (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) • z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.subgroup_moeb UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.subgroup_moeb
@[simp]
theorem subgroup_to_sl_moeb (A : Γ) (z : ℍ) : A • z = (A : SL(2, ℤ)) • z :=
rfl
#align upper_half_plane.subgroup_to_sl_moeb UpperHalfPlane.ModularGroup.subgroup_to_sl_moeb
@[simp high]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/UpperHalfPlane/Basic.lean | 446 | 447 | theorem SL_neg_smul (g : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ) : -g • z = g • z := by |
simp only [coe_GLPos_neg, sl_moeb, coe_int_neg, neg_smul, coe']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConvergenceInMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space
#align_import measure_theory.function.uniform_integrable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
/-!
# Uniform integrability
This file contains the definitions for uniform integrability (both in the measure theory sense
as well as the probability theory sense). This file also contains the Vitali convergence theorem
which establishes a relation between uniform integrability, convergence in measure and
Lp convergence.
Uniform integrability plays a vital role in the theory of martingales most notably is used to
formulate the martingale convergence theorem.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable`: uniform integrability in the measure theory sense.
In particular, a sequence of functions `f` is uniformly integrable if for all `ε > 0`, there
exists some `δ > 0` such that for all sets `s` of smaller measure than `δ`, the Lp-norm of
`f i` restricted `s` is smaller than `ε` for all `i`.
* `MeasureTheory.UniformIntegrable`: uniform integrability in the probability theory sense.
In particular, a sequence of measurable functions `f` is uniformly integrable in the
probability theory sense if it is uniformly integrable in the measure theory sense and
has uniformly bounded Lp-norm.
# Main results
* `MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite`: a finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly
integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ae`: a sequence of Lp functions which is uniformly
integrable converges in Lp if they converge almost everywhere.
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_Lp`: Vitali convergence theorem:
a sequence of Lp functions converges in Lp if and only if it is uniformly integrable
and converges in measure.
## Tags
uniform integrable, uniformly absolutely continuous integral, Vitali convergence theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {α β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup β]
/-- Uniform integrability in the measure theory sense.
A sequence of functions `f` is said to be uniformly integrable if for all `ε > 0`, there exists
some `δ > 0` such that for all sets `s` with measure less than `δ`, the Lp-norm of `f i`
restricted on `s` is less than `ε`.
Uniform integrability is also known as uniformly absolutely continuous integrals. -/
def UnifIntegrable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : ι → α → β) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃ε : ℝ⦄ (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ i s,
MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ → snorm (s.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable
/-- In probability theory, a family of measurable functions is uniformly integrable if it is
uniformly integrable in the measure theory sense and is uniformly bounded. -/
def UniformIntegrable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : ι → α → β) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
(∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) ∧ UnifIntegrable f p μ ∧ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ i, snorm (f i) p μ ≤ C
#align measure_theory.uniform_integrable MeasureTheory.UniformIntegrable
namespace UniformIntegrable
protected theorem aeStronglyMeasurable {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ)
(i : ι) : AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ :=
hf.1 i
#align measure_theory.uniform_integrable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.UniformIntegrable.aeStronglyMeasurable
protected theorem unifIntegrable {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ :=
hf.2.1
#align measure_theory.uniform_integrable.unif_integrable MeasureTheory.UniformIntegrable.unifIntegrable
protected theorem memℒp {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ) (i : ι) :
Memℒp (f i) p μ :=
⟨hf.1 i,
let ⟨_, _, hC⟩ := hf.2
lt_of_le_of_lt (hC i) ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.uniform_integrable.mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.UniformIntegrable.memℒp
end UniformIntegrable
section UnifIntegrable
/-! ### `UnifIntegrable`
This section deals with uniform integrability in the measure theory sense. -/
namespace UnifIntegrable
variable {f g : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
protected theorem add (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hg : UnifIntegrable g p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) (hg_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) :
UnifIntegrable (f + g) p μ := by
intro ε hε
have hε2 : 0 < ε / 2 := half_pos hε
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁_pos, hfδ₁⟩ := hf hε2
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂_pos, hgδ₂⟩ := hg hε2
refine ⟨min δ₁ δ₂, lt_min hδ₁_pos hδ₂_pos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_add']
refine (snorm_add_le ((hf_meas i).indicator hs) ((hg_meas i).indicator hs) hp).trans ?_
have hε_halves : ENNReal.ofReal ε = ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) + ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_add hε2.le hε2.le, add_halves]
rw [hε_halves]
exact add_le_add (hfδ₁ i s hs (hμs.trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (min_le_left _ _))))
(hgδ₂ i s hs (hμs.trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (min_le_right _ _))))
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable.add MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable.add
protected theorem neg (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) : UnifIntegrable (-f) p μ := by
simp_rw [UnifIntegrable, Pi.neg_apply, Set.indicator_neg', snorm_neg]
exact hf
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable.neg MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable.neg
protected theorem sub (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hg : UnifIntegrable g p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) (hg_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) :
UnifIntegrable (f - g) p μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hf.add hg.neg hp hf_meas fun i => (hg_meas i).neg
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable.sub MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable.sub
protected theorem ae_eq (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UnifIntegrable g p μ := by
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hfδ⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun n s hs hμs => (le_of_eq <| snorm_congr_ae ?_).trans (hfδ n s hs hμs)⟩
filter_upwards [hfg n] with x hx
simp_rw [Set.indicator_apply, hx]
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable.ae_eq MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable.ae_eq
end UnifIntegrable
theorem unifIntegrable_zero_meas [MeasurableSpace α] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : ι → α → β} :
UnifIntegrable f p (0 : Measure α) :=
fun ε _ => ⟨1, one_pos, fun i s _ _ => by simp⟩
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable_zero_meas MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_zero_meas
theorem unifIntegrable_congr_ae {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f g : ι → α → β} (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ ↔ UnifIntegrable g p μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.ae_eq hfg, fun hg => hg.ae_eq fun n => (hfg n).symm⟩
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable_congr_ae MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_congr_ae
theorem tendsto_indicator_ge (f : α → β) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun M : ℕ => { x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const (i₀ := Nat.ceil (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ) + 1) fun n hn => ?_
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
simp only [not_le, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_ceil _) ?_
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_one _) ?_
norm_cast
#align measure_theory.tendsto_indicator_ge MeasureTheory.tendsto_indicator_ge
variable {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section
variable {f : α → β}
/-- This lemma is weaker than `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le`
as the latter provides `0 ≤ M` and does not require the measurability of `f`. -/
theorem Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le (hf : Memℒp f 1 μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have htendsto :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun M : ℕ => { x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
univ_mem' (id fun x => tendsto_indicator_ge f x)
have hmeas : ∀ M : ℕ, AEStronglyMeasurable ({ x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) μ := by
intro M
apply hf.1.indicator
apply StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_le stronglyMeasurable_const
hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.coe_nnreal_real.stronglyMeasurable
have hbound : HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ‖f x‖) μ := by
rw [memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf
exact hf.norm.2
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖{ x | n ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f a - 0‖ ∂μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence hmeas hbound ?_ htendsto
refine fun n => univ_mem' (id fun x => ?_)
by_cases hx : (n : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖
· dsimp
rwa [Set.indicator_of_mem]
· dsimp
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem, norm_zero]
· exact norm_nonneg _
· assumption
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at this
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := this (ENNReal.ofReal ε) (ENNReal.ofReal_pos.2 hε)
simp only [true_and_iff, ge_iff_le, zero_tsub, zero_le, sub_zero, zero_add, coe_nnnorm,
Set.mem_Icc] at hM
refine ⟨M, ?_⟩
convert hM M le_rfl
simp only [coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal (norm_nonneg _)]
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le
/-- This lemma is superceded by `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le`
which does not require measurability. -/
theorem Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas (hf : Memℒp f 1 μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 ≤ M ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε :=
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le hmeas hε
⟨max M 0, le_max_right _ _, by simpa⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas
theorem Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le (hf : Memℒp f 1 μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 ≤ M ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have hf_mk : Memℒp (hf.1.mk f) 1 μ := (memℒp_congr_ae hf.1.ae_eq_mk).mp hf
obtain ⟨M, hM_pos, hfM⟩ :=
hf_mk.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas hf.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk hε
refine ⟨M, hM_pos, (le_of_eq ?_).trans hfM⟩
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
simp only [Set.indicator_apply, coe_nnnorm, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ENNReal.coe_inj, hx.symm]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le
theorem Memℒp.snormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero (hf : Memℒp f ∞ μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∃ M : ℝ, snormEssSup ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) μ = 0 := by
have hbdd : snormEssSup f μ < ∞ := hf.snorm_lt_top
refine ⟨(snorm f ∞ μ + 1).toReal, ?_⟩
rw [snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict]
· have : μ.restrict { x : α | (snorm f ⊤ μ + 1).toReal ≤ ‖f x‖₊ } = 0 := by
simp only [coe_nnnorm, snorm_exponent_top, Measure.restrict_eq_zero]
have : { x : α | (snormEssSup f μ + 1).toReal ≤ ‖f x‖ } ⊆
{ x : α | snormEssSup f μ < ‖f x‖₊ } := by
intro x hx
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal hbdd.ne ENNReal.coe_lt_top.ne,
ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hx
rw [ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal hbdd.ne]
· exact ENNReal.lt_add_right hbdd.ne one_ne_zero
· exact (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hbdd, ENNReal.one_lt_top⟩).ne
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
refine (measure_mono this).trans ?_
have hle := coe_nnnorm_ae_le_snormEssSup f μ
simp_rw [ae_iff, not_le] at hle
exact nonpos_iff_eq_zero.2 hle
rw [this, snormEssSup_measure_zero]
exact measurableSet_le measurable_const hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero
/- This lemma is slightly weaker than `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le` as the
latter provides `0 < M`. -/
theorem Memℒp.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_le (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ M : ℝ, snorm ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
by_cases hp_ne_zero : p = 0
· refine ⟨1, hp_ne_zero.symm ▸ ?_⟩
simp [snorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp_ne_top : p = ∞
· subst hp_ne_top
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.snormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero hmeas
refine ⟨M, ?_⟩
simp only [snorm_exponent_top, hM, zero_le]
obtain ⟨M, hM', hM⟩ := Memℒp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le
(μ := μ) (hf.norm_rpow hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top) (Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hε p.toReal)
refine ⟨M ^ (1 / p.toReal), ?_⟩
rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, ← ENNReal.rpow_one (ENNReal.ofReal ε)]
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_one_div_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm]
rw [ENNReal.rpow_mul,
ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (one_div_pos.2 <| ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top),
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos hε]
convert hM
rename_i x
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm,
nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm]
have hiff : M ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ ↔ M ≤ ‖‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal‖₊ := by
rw [coe_nnnorm, coe_nnnorm, Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), norm_norm,
← Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff hM' (Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
(one_div_pos.2 <| ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top), ← Real.rpow_mul (norm_nonneg _),
mul_one_div_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm, Real.rpow_one]
by_cases hx : x ∈ { x : α | M ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_mem, Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg]
· rfl
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rwa [← hiff]
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
· simp [(ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm]
· rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rwa [← hiff]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_le
/-- This lemma implies that a single function is uniformly integrable (in the probability sense). -/
theorem Memℒp.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 < M ∧ snorm ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_le hmeas hε
refine
⟨max M 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _), le_trans (snorm_mono fun x => ?_) hM⟩
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
refine Set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (fun x hx => ?_) (fun x => norm_nonneg (f x)) x
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx -- removing the `rw` breaks the proof!
exact (max_le_iff.1 hx).1
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le
end
theorem snorm_indicator_le_of_bound {f : α → β} (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {M : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ < M) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ), ∀ s,
MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ → snorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
by_cases hM : M ≤ 0
· refine ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun s _ _ => ?_⟩
rw [(_ : f = 0)]
· simp [hε.le]
· ext x
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
exact (lt_of_lt_of_le (hf x) hM).le
rw [not_le] at hM
refine ⟨(ε / M) ^ p.toReal, Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (div_pos hε hM) _, fun s hs hμ => ?_⟩
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict hs]
have haebdd : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ M := by
filter_upwards
exact fun x => (hf x).le
refine le_trans (snorm_le_of_ae_bound haebdd) ?_
rw [Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter,
← ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl _) (Or.inl ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top)]
· rw [← one_div, ENNReal.rpow_one_div_le_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top)]
refine le_trans hμ ?_
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos (div_pos hε hM),
ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top), ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos hM]
· simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, Ne]
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_le_of_bound MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_le_of_bound
section
variable {f : α → β}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_indicator_le`. -/
theorem Memℒp.snorm_indicator_le' (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : Memℒp f p μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
snorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ 2 * ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨M, hMpos, hM⟩ := hf.snorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le hmeas hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ :=
snorm_indicator_le_of_bound (f := { x | ‖f x‖ < M }.indicator f) hp_top hε (by
intro x
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, Set.indicator_apply]
· split_ifs with h
exacts [h, hMpos])
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
rw [(_ : f = { x : α | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f + { x : α | ‖f x‖ < M }.indicator f)]
· rw [snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict hs]
refine le_trans (snorm_add_le ?_ ?_ hp_one) ?_
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(hmeas.indicator (measurableSet_le measurable_const hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe))
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(hmeas.indicator (measurableSet_lt hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe measurable_const))
· rw [two_mul]
refine add_le_add (le_trans (snorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self) hM) ?_
rw [← snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict hs]
exact hδ s hs hμs
· ext x
by_cases hx : M ≤ ‖f x‖
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_of_mem, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, add_zero] <;> simpa
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, Set.indicator_of_mem, zero_add] <;>
simpa using hx
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_indicator_le' MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_indicator_le'
/-- This lemma is superceded by `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_indicator_le` which does not require
measurability on `f`. -/
theorem Memℒp.snorm_indicator_le_of_meas (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : Memℒp f p μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
snorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := hf.snorm_indicator_le' hp_one hp_top hmeas (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => le_trans (hδ s hs hμs) ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos zero_lt_two, (by norm_num : ENNReal.ofReal 2 = 2),
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'] <;>
norm_num
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_indicator_le_of_meas MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_indicator_le_of_meas
theorem Memℒp.snorm_indicator_le (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
snorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have hℒp := hf
obtain ⟨⟨f', hf', heq⟩, _⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := (hℒp.ae_eq heq).snorm_indicator_le_of_meas hp_one hp_top hf' hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
convert hδ s hs hμs using 1
rw [snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict hs, snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict hs]
exact snorm_congr_ae heq.restrict
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_indicator_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_indicator_le
/-- A constant function is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_const {g : α → β} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
UnifIntegrable (fun _ : ι => g) p μ := by
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hgδ⟩ := hg.snorm_indicator_le hp hp_ne_top hε
exact ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun _ => hgδ⟩
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable_const MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_const
/-- A single function is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ι → α → β} (hf : ∀ i, Memℒp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
intro ε hε
by_cases hι : Nonempty ι
· cases' hι with i
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := (hf i).snorm_indicator_le hp_one hp_top hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun j s hs hμs => ?_⟩
convert hδ s hs hμs
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun i => False.elim <| hι <| Nonempty.intro i⟩
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable_subsingleton MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_subsingleton
/-- This lemma is less general than `MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite` which applies to
all sequences indexed by a finite type. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_fin (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {n : ℕ} {f : Fin n → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, Memℒp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
revert f
induction' n with n h
· intro f hf
-- Porting note (#10754): added this instance
have : Subsingleton (Fin Nat.zero) := subsingleton_fin_zero
exact unifIntegrable_subsingleton hp_one hp_top hf
intro f hfLp ε hε
let g : Fin n → α → β := fun k => f k
have hgLp : ∀ i, Memℒp (g i) p μ := fun i => hfLp i
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁pos, hδ₁⟩ := h hgLp hε
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂pos, hδ₂⟩ := (hfLp n).snorm_indicator_le hp_one hp_top hε
refine ⟨min δ₁ δ₂, lt_min hδ₁pos hδ₂pos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hi : i.val < n
· rw [(_ : f i = g ⟨i.val, hi⟩)]
· exact hδ₁ _ s hs (le_trans hμs <| ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <| min_le_left _ _)
· simp [g]
· rw [(_ : i = n)]
· exact hδ₂ _ hs (le_trans hμs <| ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <| min_le_right _ _)
· have hi' := Fin.is_lt i
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hi'
rw [not_lt] at hi
simp [← le_antisymm hi' hi]
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable_fin MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_fin
/-- A finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_finite [Finite ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, Memℒp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin ι
intro ε hε
let g : Fin n → α → β := f ∘ hn.some.symm
have hg : ∀ i, Memℒp (g i) p μ := fun _ => hf _
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := unifIntegrable_fin hp_one hp_top hg hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
specialize hδ (hn.some i) s hs hμs
simp_rw [g, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply] at hδ
assumption
#align measure_theory.unif_integrable_finite MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite
end
theorem snorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd (μ : Measure α)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)
{f g : α → β} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ c) :
snorm (s.indicator (f - g)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal c * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ x, ‖s.indicator (f - g) x‖ ≤ ‖s.indicator (fun _ => c) x‖ := by
intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Pi.sub_apply, ← dist_eq_norm,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hc]
exact hf x hx
· simp [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx]
refine le_trans (snorm_mono this) ?_
rw [snorm_indicator_const hs hp hp']
refine mul_le_mul_right' (le_of_eq ?_) _
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hc]
#align measure_theory.snorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd MeasureTheory.snorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd
/-- A sequence of uniformly integrable functions which converges μ-a.e. converges in Lp. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hg' : Memℒp g p μ) (hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => snorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero]
intro ε hε
by_cases h : ε < ∞; swap
· rw [not_lt, top_le_iff] at h
exact ⟨0, fun n _ => by simp [h]⟩
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· exact ⟨0, fun n _ => by simp [hμ]⟩
have hε' : 0 < ε.toReal / 3 :=
div_pos (ENNReal.toReal_pos (gt_iff_lt.1 hε).ne.symm h.ne) (by norm_num)
have hdivp : 0 ≤ 1 / p.toReal := by
refine one_div_nonneg.2 ?_
rw [← ENNReal.zero_toReal, ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal ENNReal.zero_ne_top hp']
exact le_trans (zero_le _) hp
have hpow : 0 < measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ) _
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁, hsnorm₁⟩ := hui hε'
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂, hsnorm₂⟩ := hg'.snorm_indicator_le hp hp' hε'
obtain ⟨t, htm, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto' hf hg hfg (lt_min hδ₁ hδ₂)
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff] at ht₂
specialize ht₂ (ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)))
(div_pos (ENNReal.toReal_pos (gt_iff_lt.1 hε).ne.symm h.ne) (mul_pos (by norm_num) hpow))
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.1 ht₂; clear ht₂
refine ⟨N, fun n hn => ?_⟩
rw [← t.indicator_self_add_compl (f n - g)]
refine le_trans (snorm_add_le (((hf n).sub hg).indicator htm).aestronglyMeasurable
(((hf n).sub hg).indicator htm.compl).aestronglyMeasurable hp) ?_
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, Set.indicator_add' t, Set.indicator_neg']
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right (snorm_add_le ((hf n).indicator htm).aestronglyMeasurable
(hg.indicator htm).neg.aestronglyMeasurable hp) _) ?_
have hnf : snorm (t.indicator (f n)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
refine hsnorm₁ n t htm (le_trans ht₁ ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ₁.le]
exact min_le_left _ _
have hng : snorm (t.indicator g) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
refine hsnorm₂ t htm (le_trans ht₁ ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ₂.le]
exact min_le_right _ _
have hlt : snorm (tᶜ.indicator (f n - g)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
specialize hN n hn
have : 0 ≤ ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)) := by positivity
have := snorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd μ hp' htm.compl this fun x hx =>
(dist_comm (g x) (f n x) ▸ (hN x hx).le :
dist (f n x) (g x) ≤ ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)))
refine le_trans this ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, ← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (measure_lt_top μ tᶜ).ne,
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg hdivp, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul, mul_assoc]
· refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (mul_le_of_le_one_right hε'.le ?_)
rw [mul_comm, mul_one_div, div_le_one]
· refine Real.rpow_le_rpow ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
(ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ).le ?_) hdivp
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_measureUnivNNReal]
exact measure_mono (Set.subset_univ _)
· exact Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ) _
· positivity
have : ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) = ε / 3 := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (show (0 : ℝ) < 3 by norm_num), ENNReal.ofReal_toReal h.ne]
simp
rw [this] at hnf hng hlt
rw [snorm_neg, ← ENNReal.add_thirds ε, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact add_le_add_three hnf hng hlt
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas MeasureTheory.tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas
/-- A sequence of uniformly integrable functions which converges μ-a.e. converges in Lp. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/UniformIntegrable.lean | 555 | 571 | theorem tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ae [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {f : ℕ → α → β}
{g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ)
(hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => snorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by |
have : ∀ n, snorm (f n - g) p μ = snorm ((hf n).mk (f n) - hg.1.mk g) p μ :=
fun n => snorm_congr_ae ((hf n).ae_eq_mk.sub hg.1.ae_eq_mk)
simp_rw [this]
refine tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).stronglyMeasurable_mk)
hg.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk (hg.ae_eq hg.1.ae_eq_mk) (hui.ae_eq fun n => (hf n).ae_eq_mk) ?_
have h_ae_forall_eq : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, f n x = (hf n).mk (f n) x := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
exact fun n => (hf n).ae_eq_mk
filter_upwards [hfg, h_ae_forall_eq, hg.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx_tendsto hxf_eq hxg_eq
rw [← hxg_eq]
convert hx_tendsto using 1
ext1 n
exact (hxf_eq n).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Matthew Robert Ballard
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Digits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.MaxPowDiv
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import number_theory.padics.padic_val from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60fa54e778c9e85d930efae172435f42fb0d71f7"
/-!
# `p`-adic Valuation
This file defines the `p`-adic valuation on `ℕ`, `ℤ`, and `ℚ`.
The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` is the difference of the multiplicities of `p` in the numerator and
denominator of `q`. This function obeys the standard properties of a valuation, with the appropriate
assumptions on `p`. The `p`-adic valuations on `ℕ` and `ℤ` agree with that on `ℚ`.
The valuation induces a norm on `ℚ`. This norm is defined in padicNorm.lean.
## Notations
This file uses the local notation `/.` for `Rat.mk`.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
## Calculations with `p`-adic valuations
* `padicValNat_factorial`: Legendre's Theorem. The `p`-adic valuation of `n!` is the sum of the
quotients `n / p ^ i`. This sum is expressed over the finset `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound
greater than `log p n`. See `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_factorial` for the same result but stated in the
language of prime multiplicity.
* `sub_one_mul_padicValNat_factorial`: Legendre's Theorem. Taking (`p - 1`) times
the `p`-adic valuation of `n!` equals `n` minus the sum of base `p` digits of `n`.
* `padicValNat_choose`: Kummer's Theorem. The `p`-adic valuation of `n.choose k` is the number
of carries when `k` and `n - k` are added in base `p`. This sum is expressed over the finset
`Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than `log p n`. See `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_choose` for the
same result but stated in the language of prime multiplicity.
* `sub_one_mul_padicValNat_choose_eq_sub_sum_digits`: Kummer's Theorem. Taking (`p - 1`) times the
`p`-adic valuation of the binomial `n` over `k` equals the sum of the digits of `k` plus the sum of
the digits of `n - k` minus the sum of digits of `n`, all base `p`.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation
-/
universe u
open Nat
open Rat
open multiplicity
/-- For `p ≠ 1`, the `p`-adic valuation of a natural `n ≠ 0` is the largest natural number `k` such
that `p^k` divides `n`. If `n = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValNat p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValNat (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if h : p ≠ 1 ∧ 0 < n then (multiplicity p n).get (multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.2 h) else 0
#align padic_val_nat padicValNat
namespace padicValNat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
/-- `padicValNat p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValNat p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValNat]
#align padic_val_nat.zero padicValNat.zero
/-- `padicValNat p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValNat p 1 = 0 := by
unfold padicValNat
split_ifs
· simp
· rfl
#align padic_val_nat.one padicValNat.one
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValNat p p` is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValNat p p = 1 := by
have neq_one : ¬p = 1 ↔ True := iff_of_true hp.ne' trivial
have eq_zero_false : p = 0 ↔ False := iff_false_intro (zero_lt_one.trans hp).ne'
simp [padicValNat, neq_one, eq_zero_false]
#align padic_val_nat.self padicValNat.self
@[simp]
theorem eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : padicValNat p n = 0 ↔ p = 1 ∨ n = 0 ∨ ¬p ∣ n := by
simp only [padicValNat, dite_eq_right_iff, PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe, Nat.cast_zero,
multiplicity_eq_zero, and_imp, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ← or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align padic_val_nat.eq_zero_iff padicValNat.eq_zero_iff
theorem eq_zero_of_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (h : ¬p ∣ n) : padicValNat p n = 0 :=
eq_zero_iff.2 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr h
#align padic_val_nat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd
open Nat.maxPowDiv
theorem maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity {p n : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hn : 0 < n) :
p.maxPowDiv n = multiplicity p n := by
apply multiplicity.unique <| pow_dvd p n
intro h
apply Nat.not_lt.mpr <| le_of_dvd hp hn h
simp
theorem maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity_get {p n : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hn : 0 < n) (h : Finite p n) :
p.maxPowDiv n = (multiplicity p n).get h := by
rw [PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe.mpr]
apply maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity hp hn|>.symm
/-- Allows for more efficient code for `padicValNat` -/
@[csimp]
theorem padicValNat_eq_maxPowDiv : @padicValNat = @maxPowDiv := by
ext p n
by_cases h : 1 < p ∧ 0 < n
· dsimp [padicValNat]
rw [dif_pos ⟨Nat.ne_of_gt h.1,h.2⟩, maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity_get h.1 h.2]
· simp only [not_and_or,not_gt_eq,Nat.le_zero] at h
apply h.elim
· intro h
interval_cases p
· simp [Classical.em]
· dsimp [padicValNat, maxPowDiv]
rw [go, if_neg, dif_neg] <;> simp
· intro h
simp [h]
end padicValNat
/-- For `p ≠ 1`, the `p`-adic valuation of an integer `z ≠ 0` is the largest natural number `k` such
that `p^k` divides `z`. If `x = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValInt p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValInt (p : ℕ) (z : ℤ) : ℕ :=
padicValNat p z.natAbs
#align padic_val_int padicValInt
namespace padicValInt
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
theorem of_ne_one_ne_zero {z : ℤ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
padicValInt p z =
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) z).get
(by
apply multiplicity.finite_int_iff.2
simp [hp, hz]) := by
rw [padicValInt, padicValNat, dif_pos (And.intro hp (Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hz))]
simp only [multiplicity.Int.natAbs p z]
#align padic_val_int.of_ne_one_ne_zero padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero
/-- `padicValInt p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValInt p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.zero padicValInt.zero
/-- `padicValInt p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValInt p 1 = 0 := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.one padicValInt.one
/-- The `p`-adic value of a natural is its `p`-adic value as an integer. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_nat {n : ℕ} : padicValInt p n = padicValNat p n := by simp [padicValInt]
#align padic_val_int.of_nat padicValInt.of_nat
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValInt p p` is `1`. -/
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValInt p p = 1 := by simp [padicValNat.self hp]
#align padic_val_int.self padicValInt.self
theorem eq_zero_of_not_dvd {z : ℤ} (h : ¬(p : ℤ) ∣ z) : padicValInt p z = 0 := by
rw [padicValInt, padicValNat]
split_ifs <;> simp [multiplicity.Int.natAbs, multiplicity_eq_zero.2 h]
#align padic_val_int.eq_zero_of_not_dvd padicValInt.eq_zero_of_not_dvd
end padicValInt
/-- `padicValRat` defines the valuation of a rational `q` to be the valuation of `q.num` minus the
valuation of `q.den`. If `q = 0` or `p = 1`, then `padicValRat p q` defaults to `0`. -/
def padicValRat (p : ℕ) (q : ℚ) : ℤ :=
padicValInt p q.num - padicValNat p q.den
#align padic_val_rat padicValRat
lemma padicValRat_def (p : ℕ) (q : ℚ) :
padicValRat p q = padicValInt p q.num - padicValNat p q.den :=
rfl
namespace padicValRat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
/-- `padicValRat p q` is symmetric in `q`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem neg (q : ℚ) : padicValRat p (-q) = padicValRat p q := by
simp [padicValRat, padicValInt]
#align padic_val_rat.neg padicValRat.neg
/-- `padicValRat p 0` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValRat p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.zero padicValRat.zero
/-- `padicValRat p 1` is `0` for any `p`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValRat p 1 = 0 := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.one padicValRat.one
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is its `p`-adic_value as a rational. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_int {z : ℤ} : padicValRat p z = padicValInt p z := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.of_int padicValRat.of_int
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is the multiplicity of `p` in `z`. -/
theorem of_int_multiplicity {z : ℤ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (z : ℚ) = (multiplicity (p : ℤ) z).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp, hz⟩) := by
rw [of_int, padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero hp hz]
#align padic_val_rat.of_int_multiplicity padicValRat.of_int_multiplicity
theorem multiplicity_sub_multiplicity {q : ℚ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p q =
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) q.num).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp, Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hq⟩) -
(multiplicity p q.den).get
(by
rw [← finite_iff_dom, finite_nat_iff]
exact ⟨hp, q.pos⟩) := by
rw [padicValRat, padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero hp, padicValNat, dif_pos]
· exact ⟨hp, q.pos⟩
· exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hq
#align padic_val_rat.multiplicity_sub_multiplicity padicValRat.multiplicity_sub_multiplicity
/-- The `p`-adic value of an integer `z ≠ 0` is its `p`-adic value as a rational. -/
@[simp]
theorem of_nat {n : ℕ} : padicValRat p n = padicValNat p n := by simp [padicValRat]
#align padic_val_rat.of_nat padicValRat.of_nat
/-- If `p ≠ 0` and `p ≠ 1`, then `padicValRat p p` is `1`. -/
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValRat p p = 1 := by simp [hp]
#align padic_val_rat.self padicValRat.self
end padicValRat
section padicValNat
variable {p : ℕ}
theorem zero_le_padicValRat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ padicValRat p n := by simp
#align zero_le_padic_val_rat_of_nat zero_le_padicValRat_of_nat
/-- `padicValRat` coincides with `padicValNat`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem padicValRat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : ↑(padicValNat p n) = padicValRat p n := by simp
#align padic_val_rat_of_nat padicValRat_of_nat
/-- A simplification of `padicValNat` when one input is prime, by analogy with
`padicValRat_def`. -/
theorem padicValNat_def [hp : Fact p.Prime] {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
padicValNat p n = (multiplicity p n).get (multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.2 ⟨hp.out.ne_one, hn⟩) :=
dif_pos ⟨hp.out.ne_one, hn⟩
#align padic_val_nat_def padicValNat_def
theorem padicValNat_def' {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 1) (hn : 0 < n) :
↑(padicValNat p n) = multiplicity p n := by simp [padicValNat, hp, hn]
#align padic_val_nat_def' padicValNat_def'
@[simp]
theorem padicValNat_self [Fact p.Prime] : padicValNat p p = 1 := by
rw [padicValNat_def (@Fact.out p.Prime).pos]
simp
#align padic_val_nat_self padicValNat_self
theorem one_le_padicValNat_of_dvd {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hn : 0 < n) (div : p ∣ n) :
1 ≤ padicValNat p n := by
rwa [← PartENat.coe_le_coe, padicValNat_def' hp.out.ne_one hn, ← pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity,
pow_one]
#align one_le_padic_val_nat_of_dvd one_le_padicValNat_of_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_padicValNat_ne_zero {p n : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hn0 : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ padicValNat p n ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun h => one_le_iff_ne_zero.mp (one_le_padicValNat_of_dvd hn0.bot_lt h), fun h =>
Classical.not_not.1 (mt padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd h)⟩
#align dvd_iff_padic_val_nat_ne_zero dvd_iff_padicValNat_ne_zero
open List
theorem le_multiplicity_iff_replicate_subperm_factors {a b : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (ha : a.Prime)
(hb : b ≠ 0) :
↑n ≤ multiplicity a b ↔ replicate n a <+~ b.factors :=
(replicate_subperm_factors_iff ha hb).trans multiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity |>.symm
theorem le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors {a b : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (ha : a.Prime)
(hb : b ≠ 0) :
n ≤ padicValNat a b ↔ replicate n a <+~ b.factors := by
rw [← le_multiplicity_iff_replicate_subperm_factors ha hb,
← padicValNat_def' ha.ne_one (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb), Nat.cast_le]
end padicValNat
namespace padicValRat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- The multiplicity of `p : ℕ` in `a : ℤ` is finite exactly when `a ≠ 0`. -/
theorem finite_int_prime_iff {a : ℤ} : Finite (p : ℤ) a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
simp [finite_int_iff, hp.1.ne_one]
#align padic_val_rat.finite_int_prime_iff padicValRat.finite_int_prime_iff
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p q` when `q` is expressed in terms of `Rat.mk`. -/
protected theorem defn (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hqz : q ≠ 0)
(qdf : q = n /. d) :
padicValRat p q =
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) n).get
(finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, fun hn => by simp_all⟩) -
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) d).get
(finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, fun hd => by simp_all⟩) := by
have hd : d ≠ 0 := Rat.mk_denom_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hqz qdf
let ⟨c, hc1, hc2⟩ := Rat.num_den_mk hd qdf
rw [padicValRat.multiplicity_sub_multiplicity hp.1.ne_one hqz]
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff, hc1, hc2]
rw [multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1),
multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1)]
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add]
simp_rw [Int.natCast_multiplicity p q.den]
ring
-- Porting note: was
-- simp only [hc1, hc2, multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1),
-- hp.1.ne_one, hqz, pos_iff_ne_zero, Int.natCast_multiplicity p q.den
#align padic_val_rat.defn padicValRat.defn
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p (q * r)` with conditions `q ≠ 0`, `r ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem mul {q r : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (q * r) = padicValRat p q + padicValRat p r := by
have : q * r = (q.num * r.num) /. (q.den * r.den) := by
rw [Rat.mul_eq_mkRat, Rat.mkRat_eq_divInt, Nat.cast_mul]
have hq' : q.num /. q.den ≠ 0 := by rwa [Rat.num_divInt_den]
have hr' : r.num /. r.den ≠ 0 := by rwa [Rat.num_divInt_den]
have hp' : Prime (p : ℤ) := Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1
rw [padicValRat.defn p (mul_ne_zero hq hr) this]
conv_rhs =>
rw [← q.num_divInt_den, padicValRat.defn p hq', ← r.num_divInt_den, padicValRat.defn p hr']
rw [multiplicity.mul' hp', multiplicity.mul' hp', Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add]
ring
-- Porting note: was
-- simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align padic_val_rat.mul padicValRat.mul
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p (q^k)` with condition `q ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem pow {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) {k : ℕ} :
padicValRat p (q ^ k) = k * padicValRat p q := by
induction k <;>
simp [*, padicValRat.mul hq (pow_ne_zero _ hq), _root_.pow_succ', add_mul, add_comm]
#align padic_val_rat.pow padicValRat.pow
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p (q⁻¹)` with condition `q ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem inv (q : ℚ) : padicValRat p q⁻¹ = -padicValRat p q := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
· rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← padicValRat.mul (inv_ne_zero hq) hq, inv_mul_cancel hq,
padicValRat.one]
#align padic_val_rat.inv padicValRat.inv
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValRat p (q / r)` with conditions `q ≠ 0`, `r ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem div {q r : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (q / r) = padicValRat p q - padicValRat p r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, padicValRat.mul hq (inv_ne_zero hr), padicValRat.inv r, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align padic_val_rat.div padicValRat.div
/-- A condition for `padicValRat p (n₁ / d₁) ≤ padicValRat p (n₂ / d₂)`, in terms of
divisibility by `p^n`. -/
theorem padicValRat_le_padicValRat_iff {n₁ n₂ d₁ d₂ : ℤ} (hn₁ : n₁ ≠ 0) (hn₂ : n₂ ≠ 0)
(hd₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (hd₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
padicValRat p (n₁ /. d₁) ≤ padicValRat p (n₂ /. d₂) ↔
∀ n : ℕ, (p : ℤ) ^ n ∣ n₁ * d₂ → (p : ℤ) ^ n ∣ n₂ * d₁ := by
have hf1 : Finite (p : ℤ) (n₁ * d₂) := finite_int_prime_iff.2 (mul_ne_zero hn₁ hd₂)
have hf2 : Finite (p : ℤ) (n₂ * d₁) := finite_int_prime_iff.2 (mul_ne_zero hn₂ hd₁)
conv =>
lhs
rw [padicValRat.defn p (Rat.divInt_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hn₁ hd₁) rfl,
padicValRat.defn p (Rat.divInt_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hn₂ hd₂) rfl, sub_le_iff_le_add', ←
add_sub_assoc, _root_.le_sub_iff_add_le]
norm_cast
rw [← multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1) hf1, add_comm, ←
multiplicity.mul' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1) hf2, PartENat.get_le_get,
multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff]
#align padic_val_rat.padic_val_rat_le_padic_val_rat_iff padicValRat.padicValRat_le_padicValRat_iff
/-- Sufficient conditions to show that the `p`-adic valuation of `q` is less than or equal to the
`p`-adic valuation of `q + r`. -/
theorem le_padicValRat_add_of_le {q r : ℚ} (hqr : q + r ≠ 0)
(h : padicValRat p q ≤ padicValRat p r) : padicValRat p q ≤ padicValRat p (q + r) :=
if hq : q = 0 then by simpa [hq] using h
else
if hr : r = 0 then by simp [hr]
else by
have hqn : q.num ≠ 0 := Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hq
have hqd : (q.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Rat.den_nz _
have hrn : r.num ≠ 0 := Rat.num_ne_zero.2 hr
have hrd : (r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Rat.den_nz _
have hqreq : q + r = (q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num) /. (q.den * r.den) := Rat.add_num_den _ _
have hqrd : q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num ≠ 0 := Rat.mk_num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hqr hqreq
conv_lhs => rw [← q.num_divInt_den]
rw [hqreq, padicValRat_le_padicValRat_iff hqn hqrd hqd (mul_ne_zero hqd hrd), ←
multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff, mul_left_comm,
multiplicity.mul (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), add_mul]
rw [← q.num_divInt_den, ← r.num_divInt_den, padicValRat_le_padicValRat_iff hqn hrn hqd hrd, ←
multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff] at h
calc
_ ≤
min (multiplicity (↑p) (q.num * r.den * q.den))
(multiplicity (↑p) (↑q.den * r.num * ↑q.den)) :=
le_min
(by rw [@multiplicity.mul _ _ _ _ (_ * _) _ (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), add_comm])
(by
rw [mul_assoc,
@multiplicity.mul _ _ _ _ (q.den : ℤ) (_ * _)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1)]
exact add_le_add_left h _)
_ ≤ _ := min_le_multiplicity_add
#align padic_val_rat.le_padic_val_rat_add_of_le padicValRat.le_padicValRat_add_of_le
/-- The minimum of the valuations of `q` and `r` is at most the valuation of `q + r`. -/
theorem min_le_padicValRat_add {q r : ℚ} (hqr : q + r ≠ 0) :
min (padicValRat p q) (padicValRat p r) ≤ padicValRat p (q + r) :=
(le_total (padicValRat p q) (padicValRat p r)).elim
(fun h => by rw [min_eq_left h]; exact le_padicValRat_add_of_le hqr h)
(fun h => by rw [min_eq_right h, add_comm]; exact le_padicValRat_add_of_le (by rwa [add_comm]) h)
#align padic_val_rat.min_le_padic_val_rat_add padicValRat.min_le_padicValRat_add
/-- Ultrametric property of a p-adic valuation. -/
lemma add_eq_min {q r : ℚ} (hqr : q + r ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0)
(hval : padicValRat p q ≠ padicValRat p r) :
padicValRat p (q + r) = min (padicValRat p q) (padicValRat p r) := by
have h1 := min_le_padicValRat_add (p := p) hqr
have h2 := min_le_padicValRat_add (p := p) (ne_of_eq_of_ne (add_neg_cancel_right q r) hq)
have h3 := min_le_padicValRat_add (p := p) (ne_of_eq_of_ne (add_neg_cancel_right r q) hr)
rw [add_neg_cancel_right, padicValRat.neg] at h2 h3
rw [add_comm] at h3
refine le_antisymm (le_min ?_ ?_) h1
· contrapose! h2
rw [min_eq_right h2.le] at h3
exact lt_min h2 (lt_of_le_of_ne h3 hval)
· contrapose! h3
rw [min_eq_right h3.le] at h2
exact lt_min h3 (lt_of_le_of_ne h2 hval.symm)
lemma add_eq_of_lt {q r : ℚ} (hqr : q + r ≠ 0)
(hq : q ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) (hval : padicValRat p q < padicValRat p r) :
padicValRat p (q + r) = padicValRat p q := by
rw [add_eq_min hqr hq hr (ne_of_lt hval), min_eq_left (le_of_lt hval)]
lemma lt_add_of_lt {q r₁ r₂ : ℚ} (hqr : r₁ + r₂ ≠ 0)
(hval₁ : padicValRat p q < padicValRat p r₁) (hval₂ : padicValRat p q < padicValRat p r₂) :
padicValRat p q < padicValRat p (r₁ + r₂) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_min hval₁ hval₂) (padicValRat.min_le_padicValRat_add hqr)
@[simp]
lemma self_pow_inv (r : ℕ) : padicValRat p ((p : ℚ) ^ r)⁻¹ = -r := by
rw [padicValRat.inv, neg_inj, padicValRat.pow (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hp.elim.ne_zero),
padicValRat.self hp.elim.one_lt, mul_one]
/-- A finite sum of rationals with positive `p`-adic valuation has positive `p`-adic valuation
(if the sum is non-zero). -/
theorem sum_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} {F : ℕ → ℚ} (hF : ∀ i, i < n → 0 < padicValRat p (F i))
(hn0 : ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, F i ≠ 0) : 0 < padicValRat p (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, F i) := by
induction' n with d hd
· exact False.elim (hn0 rfl)
· rw [Finset.sum_range_succ] at hn0 ⊢
by_cases h : ∑ x ∈ Finset.range d, F x = 0
· rw [h, zero_add]
exact hF d (lt_add_one _)
· refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (min_le_padicValRat_add hn0)
refine lt_min (hd (fun i hi => ?_) h) (hF d (lt_add_one _))
exact hF _ (lt_trans hi (lt_add_one _))
#align padic_val_rat.sum_pos_of_pos padicValRat.sum_pos_of_pos
/-- If the p-adic valuation of a finite set of positive rationals is greater than a given rational
number, then the p-adic valuation of their sum is also greater than the same rational number. -/
theorem lt_sum_of_lt {p j : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] {F : ℕ → ℚ} {S : Finset ℕ}
(hS : S.Nonempty) (hF : ∀ i, i ∈ S → padicValRat p (F j) < padicValRat p (F i))
(hn1 : ∀ i : ℕ, 0 < F i) : padicValRat p (F j) < padicValRat p (∑ i ∈ S, F i) := by
induction' hS using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with k s S' Hnot Hne Hind
· rw [Finset.sum_singleton]
exact hF k (by simp)
· rw [Finset.cons_eq_insert, Finset.sum_insert Hnot]
exact padicValRat.lt_add_of_lt
(ne_of_gt (add_pos (hn1 s) (Finset.sum_pos (fun i _ => hn1 i) Hne)))
(hF _ (by simp [Finset.mem_insert, true_or]))
(Hind (fun i hi => hF _ (by rw [Finset.cons_eq_insert,Finset.mem_insert]; exact Or.inr hi)))
end padicValRat
namespace padicValNat
variable {p a b : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- A rewrite lemma for `padicValNat p (a * b)` with conditions `a ≠ 0`, `b ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem mul : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → padicValNat p (a * b) = padicValNat p a + padicValNat p b :=
mod_cast @padicValRat.mul p _ a b
#align padic_val_nat.mul padicValNat.mul
protected theorem div_of_dvd (h : b ∣ a) :
padicValNat p (a / b) = padicValNat p a - padicValNat p b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := h
obtain ⟨hb, hk⟩ := mul_ne_zero_iff.mp ha
rw [mul_comm, k.mul_div_cancel hb.bot_lt, padicValNat.mul hk hb, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align padic_val_nat.div_of_dvd padicValNat.div_of_dvd
/-- Dividing out by a prime factor reduces the `padicValNat` by `1`. -/
protected theorem div (dvd : p ∣ b) : padicValNat p (b / p) = padicValNat p b - 1 := by
rw [padicValNat.div_of_dvd dvd, padicValNat_self]
#align padic_val_nat.div padicValNat.div
/-- A version of `padicValRat.pow` for `padicValNat`. -/
protected theorem pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : padicValNat p (a ^ n) = n * padicValNat p a := by
simpa only [← @Nat.cast_inj ℤ, push_cast] using padicValRat.pow (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr ha)
#align padic_val_nat.pow padicValNat.pow
@[simp]
protected theorem prime_pow (n : ℕ) : padicValNat p (p ^ n) = n := by
rw [padicValNat.pow _ (@Fact.out p.Prime).ne_zero, padicValNat_self, mul_one]
#align padic_val_nat.prime_pow padicValNat.prime_pow
protected theorem div_pow (dvd : p ^ a ∣ b) : padicValNat p (b / p ^ a) = padicValNat p b - a := by
rw [padicValNat.div_of_dvd dvd, padicValNat.prime_pow]
#align padic_val_nat.div_pow padicValNat.div_pow
protected theorem div' {m : ℕ} (cpm : Coprime p m) {b : ℕ} (dvd : m ∣ b) :
padicValNat p (b / m) = padicValNat p b := by
rw [padicValNat.div_of_dvd dvd, eq_zero_of_not_dvd (hp.out.coprime_iff_not_dvd.mp cpm),
Nat.sub_zero]
#align padic_val_nat.div' padicValNat.div'
end padicValNat
section padicValNat
variable {p : ℕ}
theorem dvd_of_one_le_padicValNat {n : ℕ} (hp : 1 ≤ padicValNat p n) : p ∣ n := by
by_contra h
rw [padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd h] at hp
exact lt_irrefl 0 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp)
#align dvd_of_one_le_padic_val_nat dvd_of_one_le_padicValNat
theorem pow_padicValNat_dvd {n : ℕ} : p ^ padicValNat p n ∣ n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn); · simp
rcases eq_or_ne p 1 with (rfl | hp); · simp
rw [multiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, padicValNat_def'] <;> assumption
#align pow_padic_val_nat_dvd pow_padicValNat_dvd
theorem padicValNat_dvd_iff_le [hp : Fact p.Prime] {a n : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
p ^ n ∣ a ↔ n ≤ padicValNat p a := by
rw [pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, ← padicValNat_def' hp.out.ne_one ha.bot_lt, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
#align padic_val_nat_dvd_iff_le padicValNat_dvd_iff_le
theorem padicValNat_dvd_iff (n : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℕ) :
p ^ n ∣ a ↔ a = 0 ∨ n ≤ padicValNat p a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact iff_of_true (dvd_zero _) (Or.inl rfl)
· rw [padicValNat_dvd_iff_le ha, or_iff_right ha]
#align padic_val_nat_dvd_iff padicValNat_dvd_iff
theorem pow_succ_padicValNat_not_dvd {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
¬p ^ (padicValNat p n + 1) ∣ n := by
rw [padicValNat_dvd_iff_le hn, not_le]
exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align pow_succ_padic_val_nat_not_dvd pow_succ_padicValNat_not_dvd
theorem padicValNat_primes {q : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [hq : Fact q.Prime] (neq : p ≠ q) :
padicValNat p q = 0 :=
@padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd p q <|
(not_congr (Iff.symm (prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq hp.1 hq.1))).mp neq
#align padic_val_nat_primes padicValNat_primes
theorem padicValNat_prime_prime_pow {q : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [hq : Fact q.Prime]
(n : ℕ) (neq : p ≠ q) : padicValNat p (q ^ n) = 0 := by
rw [padicValNat.pow _ <| Nat.Prime.ne_zero hq.elim, padicValNat_primes neq, mul_zero]
theorem padicValNat_mul_pow_left {q : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [hq : Fact q.Prime]
(n m : ℕ) (neq : p ≠ q) : padicValNat p (p^n * q^m) = n := by
rw [padicValNat.mul (NeZero.ne' (p^n)).symm (NeZero.ne' (q^m)).symm,
padicValNat.prime_pow, padicValNat_prime_prime_pow m neq, add_zero]
theorem padicValNat_mul_pow_right {q : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [hq : Fact q.Prime]
(n m : ℕ) (neq : q ≠ p) : padicValNat q (p^n * q^m) = m := by
rw [mul_comm (p^n) (q^m)]
exact padicValNat_mul_pow_left m n neq
/-- The p-adic valuation of `n` is less than or equal to its logarithm w.r.t `p`. -/
lemma padicValNat_le_nat_log (n : ℕ) : padicValNat p n ≤ Nat.log p n := by
rcases n with _ | n
· simp
rcases p with _ | _ | p
· simp
· simp
exact Nat.le_log_of_pow_le p.one_lt_succ_succ (le_of_dvd n.succ_pos pow_padicValNat_dvd)
/-- The p-adic valuation of `n` is equal to the logarithm w.r.t `p` iff
`n` is less than `p` raised to one plus the p-adic valuation of `n`. -/
lemma nat_log_eq_padicValNat_iff {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.log p n = padicValNat p n ↔ n < p ^ (padicValNat p n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.log_eq_iff (Or.inr ⟨(Nat.Prime.one_lt' p).out, by omega⟩), and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => Nat.le_of_dvd hn pow_padicValNat_dvd
lemma Nat.log_ne_padicValNat_succ {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : log 2 n ≠ padicValNat 2 (n + 1) := by
rw [Ne, log_eq_iff (by simp [hn])]
rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩
rw [← lt_add_one_iff, ← mul_one (2 ^ _)] at h1
rw [← add_one_le_iff, Nat.pow_succ] at h2
refine not_dvd_of_between_consec_multiples h1 (lt_of_le_of_ne' h2 ?_) pow_padicValNat_dvd
-- TODO(kmill): Why is this `p := 2` necessary?
exact pow_succ_padicValNat_not_dvd (p := 2) n.succ_ne_zero ∘ dvd_of_eq
lemma Nat.max_log_padicValNat_succ_eq_log_succ (n : ℕ) :
max (log 2 n) (padicValNat 2 (n + 1)) = log 2 (n + 1) := by
apply le_antisymm (max_le (le_log_of_pow_le one_lt_two (pow_log_le_add_one 2 n))
(padicValNat_le_nat_log (n + 1)))
rw [le_max_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, not_le]
intro h
replace h := le_antisymm (add_one_le_iff.mpr (lt_pow_of_log_lt one_lt_two h))
(pow_log_le_self 2 n.succ_ne_zero)
rw [h, padicValNat.prime_pow, ← h]
theorem range_pow_padicValNat_subset_divisors {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(Finset.range (padicValNat p n + 1)).image (p ^ ·) ⊆ n.divisors := by
intro t ht
simp only [exists_prop, Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_range] at ht
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [Nat.mem_divisors]
exact ⟨(pow_dvd_pow p <| by omega).trans pow_padicValNat_dvd, hn⟩
#align range_pow_padic_val_nat_subset_divisors range_pow_padicValNat_subset_divisors
theorem range_pow_padicValNat_subset_divisors' {n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] :
((Finset.range (padicValNat p n)).image fun t => p ^ (t + 1)) ⊆ n.divisors.erase 1 := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
intro t ht
simp only [exists_prop, Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_range] at ht
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Nat.mem_divisors]
refine ⟨?_, (pow_dvd_pow p <| succ_le_iff.2 hk).trans pow_padicValNat_dvd, hn⟩
exact (Nat.one_lt_pow k.succ_ne_zero hp.out.one_lt).ne'
#align range_pow_padic_val_nat_subset_divisors' range_pow_padicValNat_subset_divisors'
/-- The `p`-adic valuation of `(p * n)!` is `n` more than that of `n!`. -/
theorem padicValNat_factorial_mul (n : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] :
padicValNat p (p * n) ! = padicValNat p n ! + n := by
refine PartENat.natCast_inj.mp ?_
rw [padicValNat_def' (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp.out) <| factorial_pos (p * n), Nat.cast_add,
padicValNat_def' (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp.out) <| factorial_pos n]
exact Prime.multiplicity_factorial_mul hp.out
/-- The `p`-adic valuation of `m` equals zero if it is between `p * k` and `p * (k + 1)` for
some `k`. -/
theorem padicValNat_eq_zero_of_mem_Ioo {m k : ℕ}
(hm : m ∈ Set.Ioo (p * k) (p * (k + 1))) : padicValNat p m = 0 :=
padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd <| not_dvd_of_between_consec_multiples hm.1 hm.2
theorem padicValNat_factorial_mul_add {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : n < p) :
padicValNat p (p * m + n) ! = padicValNat p (p * m) ! := by
induction' n with n hn
· rw [add_zero]
· rw [add_succ, factorial_succ,
padicValNat.mul (succ_ne_zero (p * m + n)) <| factorial_ne_zero (p * m + _),
hn <| lt_of_succ_lt h, ← add_succ,
padicValNat_eq_zero_of_mem_Ioo ⟨(Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right <| succ_pos n),
(Nat.mul_add _ _ _▸ Nat.mul_one _ ▸ ((add_lt_add_iff_left (p * m)).mpr h))⟩,
zero_add]
/-- The `p`-adic valuation of `n!` is equal to the `p`-adic valuation of the factorial of the
largest multiple of `p` below `n`, i.e. `(p * ⌊n / p⌋)!`. -/
@[simp] theorem padicValNat_mul_div_factorial (n : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] :
padicValNat p (p * (n / p))! = padicValNat p n ! := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod n p]
exact (padicValNat_factorial_mul_add (n / p) <| mod_lt n hp.out.pos).symm
/-- **Legendre's Theorem**
The `p`-adic valuation of `n!` is the sum of the quotients `n / p ^ i`. This sum is expressed
over the finset `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than `log p n`. -/
theorem padicValNat_factorial {n b : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hnb : log p n < b) :
padicValNat p (n !) = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico 1 b, n / p ^ i :=
PartENat.natCast_inj.mp ((padicValNat_def' (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp.out) <| factorial_pos _) ▸
Prime.multiplicity_factorial hp.out hnb)
/-- **Legendre's Theorem**
Taking (`p - 1`) times the `p`-adic valuation of `n!` equals `n` minus the sum of base `p` digits
of `n`. -/
theorem sub_one_mul_padicValNat_factorial [hp : Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ):
(p - 1) * padicValNat p (n !) = n - (p.digits n).sum := by
rw [padicValNat_factorial <| lt_succ_of_lt <| lt.base (log p n)]
nth_rw 2 [← zero_add 1]
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← Finset.sum_Ico_add' _ 0 _ 1,
Ico_zero_eq_range, ← sub_one_mul_sum_log_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
/-- **Kummer's Theorem**
The `p`-adic valuation of `n.choose k` is the number of carries when `k` and `n - k` are added
in base `p`. This sum is expressed over the finset `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than
`log p n`. -/
theorem padicValNat_choose {n k b : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hkn : k ≤ n) (hnb : log p n < b) :
padicValNat p (choose n k) =
((Finset.Ico 1 b).filter fun i => p ^ i ≤ k % p ^ i + (n - k) % p ^ i).card :=
PartENat.natCast_inj.mp <| (padicValNat_def' (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp.out) <| choose_pos hkn) ▸
Prime.multiplicity_choose hp.out hkn hnb
/-- **Kummer's Theorem**
The `p`-adic valuation of `(n + k).choose k` is the number of carries when `k` and `n` are added
in base `p`. This sum is expressed over the finset `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than
`log p (n + k)`. -/
theorem padicValNat_choose' {n k b : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hnb : log p (n + k) < b) :
padicValNat p (choose (n + k) k) =
((Finset.Ico 1 b).filter fun i => p ^ i ≤ k % p ^ i + n % p ^ i).card :=
PartENat.natCast_inj.mp <| (padicValNat_def' (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp.out) <| choose_pos <|
Nat.le_add_left k n)▸ Prime.multiplicity_choose' hp.out hnb
/-- **Kummer's Theorem**
Taking (`p - 1`) times the `p`-adic valuation of the binomial `n + k` over `k` equals the sum of the
digits of `k` plus the sum of the digits of `n` minus the sum of digits of `n + k`, all base `p`.
-/
theorem sub_one_mul_padicValNat_choose_eq_sub_sum_digits' {k n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] :
(p - 1) * padicValNat p (choose (n + k) k) =
(p.digits k).sum + (p.digits n).sum - (p.digits (n + k)).sum := by
have h : k ≤ n + k := by exact Nat.le_add_left k n
simp only [Nat.choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial h]
rw [padicValNat.div_of_dvd <| factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial h, Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib,
padicValNat.mul (factorial_ne_zero _) (factorial_ne_zero _), Nat.mul_add]
simp only [sub_one_mul_padicValNat_factorial]
rw [← Nat.sub_add_comm <| digit_sum_le p k, Nat.add_sub_cancel n k, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc <|
digit_sum_le p n, Nat.sub_sub (k + n), ← Nat.sub_right_comm, Nat.sub_sub, sub_add_eq,
add_comm, tsub_tsub_assoc (Nat.le_refl (k + n)) <| (add_comm k n) ▸ (Nat.add_le_add
(digit_sum_le p n) (digit_sum_le p k)), Nat.sub_self (k + n), zero_add, add_comm]
/-- **Kummer's Theorem**
Taking (`p - 1`) times the `p`-adic valuation of the binomial `n` over `k` equals the sum of the
digits of `k` plus the sum of the digits of `n - k` minus the sum of digits of `n`, all base `p`.
-/
theorem sub_one_mul_padicValNat_choose_eq_sub_sum_digits {k n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : k ≤ n) : (p - 1) * padicValNat p (choose n k) =
(p.digits k).sum + (p.digits (n - k)).sum - (p.digits n).sum := by
convert @sub_one_mul_padicValNat_choose_eq_sub_sum_digits' _ _ _ ‹_›
all_goals omega
end padicValNat
section padicValInt
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem padicValInt_dvd_iff (n : ℕ) (a : ℤ) : (p : ℤ) ^ n ∣ a ↔ a = 0 ∨ n ≤ padicValInt p a := by
rw [padicValInt, ← Int.natAbs_eq_zero, ← padicValNat_dvd_iff, ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_pow]
#align padic_val_int_dvd_iff padicValInt_dvd_iff
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicVal.lean | 781 | 783 | theorem padicValInt_dvd (a : ℤ) : (p : ℤ) ^ padicValInt p a ∣ a := by |
rw [padicValInt_dvd_iff]
exact Or.inr le_rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.affine_subspace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e96bdfbd1e8c98a09ff75f7ac6204d142debc840"
/-!
# Affine spaces
This file defines affine subspaces (over modules) and the affine span of a set of points.
## Main definitions
* `AffineSubspace k P` is the type of affine subspaces. Unlike affine spaces, affine subspaces are
allowed to be empty, and lemmas that do not apply to empty affine subspaces have `Nonempty`
hypotheses. There is a `CompleteLattice` structure on affine subspaces.
* `AffineSubspace.direction` gives the `Submodule` spanned by the pairwise differences of points
in an `AffineSubspace`. There are various lemmas relating to the set of vectors in the
`direction`, and relating the lattice structure on affine subspaces to that on their directions.
* `AffineSubspace.parallel`, notation `∥`, gives the property of two affine subspaces being
parallel (one being a translate of the other).
* `affineSpan` gives the affine subspace spanned by a set of points, with `vectorSpan` giving its
direction. The `affineSpan` is defined in terms of `spanPoints`, which gives an explicit
description of the points contained in the affine span; `spanPoints` itself should generally only
be used when that description is required, with `affineSpan` being the main definition for other
purposes. Two other descriptions of the affine span are proved equivalent: it is the `sInf` of
affine subspaces containing the points, and (if `[Nontrivial k]`) it contains exactly those points
that are affine combinations of points in the given set.
## Implementation notes
`outParam` is used in the definition of `AddTorsor V P` to make `V` an implicit argument (deduced
from `P`) in most cases. As for modules, `k` is an explicit argument rather than implied by `P` or
`V`.
This file only provides purely algebraic definitions and results. Those depending on analysis or
topology are defined elsewhere; see `Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor` and `Topology.Algebra.Affine`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
open Set
section
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P]
/-- The submodule spanning the differences of a (possibly empty) set of points. -/
def vectorSpan (s : Set P) : Submodule k V :=
Submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s)
#align vector_span vectorSpan
/-- The definition of `vectorSpan`, for rewriting. -/
theorem vectorSpan_def (s : Set P) : vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s) :=
rfl
#align vector_span_def vectorSpan_def
/-- `vectorSpan` is monotone. -/
theorem vectorSpan_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : vectorSpan k s₁ ≤ vectorSpan k s₂ :=
Submodule.span_mono (vsub_self_mono h)
#align vector_span_mono vectorSpan_mono
variable (P)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem vectorSpan_empty : vectorSpan k (∅ : Set P) = (⊥ : Submodule k V) := by
rw [vectorSpan_def, vsub_empty, Submodule.span_empty]
#align vector_span_empty vectorSpan_empty
variable {P}
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a single point is `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem vectorSpan_singleton (p : P) : vectorSpan k ({p} : Set P) = ⊥ := by simp [vectorSpan_def]
#align vector_span_singleton vectorSpan_singleton
/-- The `s -ᵥ s` lies within the `vectorSpan k s`. -/
theorem vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan (s : Set P) : s -ᵥ s ⊆ ↑(vectorSpan k s) :=
Submodule.subset_span
#align vsub_set_subset_vector_span vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan
/-- Each pairwise difference is in the `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem vsub_mem_vectorSpan {s : Set P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vectorSpan k s :=
vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan k s (vsub_mem_vsub hp1 hp2)
#align vsub_mem_vector_span vsub_mem_vectorSpan
/-- The points in the affine span of a (possibly empty) set of points. Use `affineSpan` instead to
get an `AffineSubspace k P`. -/
def spanPoints (s : Set P) : Set P :=
{ p | ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ v ∈ vectorSpan k s, p = v +ᵥ p1 }
#align span_points spanPoints
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
theorem mem_spanPoints (p : P) (s : Set P) : p ∈ s → p ∈ spanPoints k s
| hp => ⟨p, hp, 0, Submodule.zero_mem _, (zero_vadd V p).symm⟩
#align mem_span_points mem_spanPoints
/-- A set is contained in its `spanPoints`. -/
theorem subset_spanPoints (s : Set P) : s ⊆ spanPoints k s := fun p => mem_spanPoints k p s
#align subset_span_points subset_spanPoints
/-- The `spanPoints` of a set is nonempty if and only if that set is. -/
@[simp]
theorem spanPoints_nonempty (s : Set P) : (spanPoints k s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
constructor
· contrapose
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
intro h
simp [h, spanPoints]
· exact fun h => h.mono (subset_spanPoints _ _)
#align span_points_nonempty spanPoints_nonempty
/-- Adding a point in the affine span and a vector in the spanning submodule produces a point in the
affine span. -/
theorem vadd_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_vectorSpan {s : Set P} {p : P} {v : V}
(hp : p ∈ spanPoints k s) (hv : v ∈ vectorSpan k s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ spanPoints k s := by
rcases hp with ⟨p2, ⟨hp2, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rw [hv2p, vadd_vadd]
exact ⟨p2, hp2, v + v2, (vectorSpan k s).add_mem hv hv2, rfl⟩
#align vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span vadd_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_vectorSpan
/-- Subtracting two points in the affine span produces a vector in the spanning submodule. -/
theorem vsub_mem_vectorSpan_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints {s : Set P} {p1 p2 : P}
(hp1 : p1 ∈ spanPoints k s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ spanPoints k s) : p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vectorSpan k s := by
rcases hp1 with ⟨p1a, ⟨hp1a, ⟨v1, ⟨hv1, hv1p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rcases hp2 with ⟨p2a, ⟨hp2a, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rw [hv1p, hv2p, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (v1 +ᵥ p1a), vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc]
have hv1v2 : v1 - v2 ∈ vectorSpan k s := (vectorSpan k s).sub_mem hv1 hv2
refine (vectorSpan k s).add_mem ?_ hv1v2
exact vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp1a hp2a
#align vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points vsub_mem_vectorSpan_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints
end
/-- An `AffineSubspace k P` is a subset of an `AffineSpace V P` that, if not empty, has an affine
space structure induced by a corresponding subspace of the `Module k V`. -/
structure AffineSubspace (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module k V] [AffineSpace V P] where
/-- The affine subspace seen as a subset. -/
carrier : Set P
smul_vsub_vadd_mem :
∀ (c : k) {p1 p2 p3 : P},
p1 ∈ carrier → p2 ∈ carrier → p3 ∈ carrier → c • (p1 -ᵥ p2 : V) +ᵥ p3 ∈ carrier
#align affine_subspace AffineSubspace
namespace Submodule
variable {k V : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
/-- Reinterpret `p : Submodule k V` as an `AffineSubspace k V`. -/
def toAffineSubspace (p : Submodule k V) : AffineSubspace k V where
carrier := p
smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ h₃ := p.add_mem (p.smul_mem _ (p.sub_mem h₁ h₂)) h₃
#align submodule.to_affine_subspace Submodule.toAffineSubspace
end Submodule
namespace AffineSubspace
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AffineSpace V P]
instance : SetLike (AffineSubspace k P) P where
coe := carrier
coe_injective' p q _ := by cases p; cases q; congr
/-- A point is in an affine subspace coerced to a set if and only if it is in that affine
subspace. -/
-- Porting note: removed `simp`, proof is `simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]`
theorem mem_coe (p : P) (s : AffineSubspace k P) : p ∈ (s : Set P) ↔ p ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.mem_coe AffineSubspace.mem_coe
variable {k P}
/-- The direction of an affine subspace is the submodule spanned by
the pairwise differences of points. (Except in the case of an empty
affine subspace, where the direction is the zero submodule, every
vector in the direction is the difference of two points in the affine
subspace.) -/
def direction (s : AffineSubspace k P) : Submodule k V :=
vectorSpan k (s : Set P)
#align affine_subspace.direction AffineSubspace.direction
/-- The direction equals the `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem direction_eq_vectorSpan (s : AffineSubspace k P) : s.direction = vectorSpan k (s : Set P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.direction_eq_vector_span AffineSubspace.direction_eq_vectorSpan
/-- Alternative definition of the direction when the affine subspace is nonempty. This is defined so
that the order on submodules (as used in the definition of `Submodule.span`) can be used in the
proof of `coe_direction_eq_vsub_set`, and is not intended to be used beyond that proof. -/
def directionOfNonempty {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) : Submodule k V where
carrier := (s : Set P) -ᵥ s
zero_mem' := by
cases' h with p hp
exact vsub_self p ▸ vsub_mem_vsub hp hp
add_mem' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩ ⟨p3, hp3, p4, hp4, rfl⟩
rw [← vadd_vsub_assoc]
refine vsub_mem_vsub ?_ hp4
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp3
rw [one_smul]
smul_mem' := by
rintro c _ ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩
rw [← vadd_vsub (c • (p1 -ᵥ p2)) p2]
refine vsub_mem_vsub ?_ hp2
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1 hp2 hp2
#align affine_subspace.direction_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.directionOfNonempty
/-- `direction_of_nonempty` gives the same submodule as `direction`. -/
theorem directionOfNonempty_eq_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
directionOfNonempty h = s.direction := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_le.2 Set.Subset.rfl)
rw [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe, directionOfNonempty, direction, Submodule.coe_set_mk,
AddSubmonoid.coe_set_mk]
exact vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan k _
#align affine_subspace.direction_of_nonempty_eq_direction AffineSubspace.directionOfNonempty_eq_direction
/-- The set of vectors in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace is given by `vsub_set`. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (s : Set P) -ᵥ s :=
directionOfNonempty_eq_direction h ▸ rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set
/-- A vector is in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace if and only if it is the subtraction
of two vectors in the subspace. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p1 -ᵥ p2 := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set h, Set.mem_vsub]
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, eq_comm]
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub
/-- Adding a vector in the direction to a point in the subspace produces a point in the
subspace. -/
theorem vadd_mem_of_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub ⟨p, hp⟩] at hv
rcases hv with ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩
rw [hv]
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp
rw [one_smul]
exact s.mem_coe k P _
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction
/-- Subtracting two points in the subspace produces a vector in the direction. -/
theorem vsub_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ s.direction :=
vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp1 hp2
#align affine_subspace.vsub_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vsub_mem_direction
/-- Adding a vector to a point in a subspace produces a point in the subspace if and only if the
vector is in the direction. -/
theorem vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} (v : V) {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ s ↔ v ∈ s.direction :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using vsub_mem_direction h hp, fun h => vadd_mem_of_mem_direction h hp⟩
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction
/-- Adding a vector in the direction to a point produces a point in the subspace if and only if
the original point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction)
{p : P} : v +ᵥ p ∈ s ↔ p ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv h⟩
convert vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) h
simp
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its direction equals the set of
vectors subtracting that point on the right. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (· -ᵥ p) '' s := by
rw [coe_direction_eq_vsub_set ⟨p, hp⟩]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro v ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p1 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (vsub_mem_direction hp1 hp2) hp, vadd_vsub _ _⟩
· rintro v ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p2, hp2, p, hp, rfl⟩
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its direction equals the set of
vectors subtracting that point on the left. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (p -ᵥ ·) '' s := by
ext v
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, ← Submodule.neg_mem_iff, ← SetLike.mem_coe,
coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_image]
conv_lhs =>
congr
ext
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_inj]
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction if and only if it results from
subtracting that point on the right. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p2 -ᵥ p := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp]
exact ⟨fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction if and only if it results from
subtracting that point on the left. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p -ᵥ p2 := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left hp]
exact ⟨fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that point on the right is in the
direction if and only if the other point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p2 -ᵥ p ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right hp]
simp
#align affine_subspace.vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem AffineSubspace.vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that point on the left is in the
direction if and only if the other point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p -ᵥ p2 ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left hp]
simp
#align affine_subspace.vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem AffineSubspace.vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem
/-- Two affine subspaces are equal if they have the same points. -/
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : AffineSubspace k P → Set P) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
#align affine_subspace.coe_injective AffineSubspace.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : AffineSubspace k P} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ q) : p = q :=
SetLike.ext h
#align affine_subspace.ext AffineSubspace.ext
-- Porting note: removed `simp`, proof is `simp only [SetLike.ext'_iff]`
theorem ext_iff (s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P) : (s₁ : Set P) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.symm
#align affine_subspace.ext_iff AffineSubspace.ext_iff
/-- Two affine subspaces with the same direction and nonempty intersection are equal. -/
theorem ext_of_direction_eq {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (hd : s1.direction = s2.direction)
(hn : ((s1 : Set P) ∩ s2).Nonempty) : s1 = s2 := by
ext p
have hq1 := Set.mem_of_mem_inter_left hn.some_mem
have hq2 := Set.mem_of_mem_inter_right hn.some_mem
constructor
· intro hp
rw [← vsub_vadd p hn.some]
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq2
rw [← hd]
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq1
· intro hp
rw [← vsub_vadd p hn.some]
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq1
rw [hd]
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq2
#align affine_subspace.ext_of_direction_eq AffineSubspace.ext_of_direction_eq
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- This is not an instance because it loops with `AddTorsor.nonempty`. -/
abbrev toAddTorsor (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : AddTorsor s.direction s where
vadd a b := ⟨(a : V) +ᵥ (b : P), vadd_mem_of_mem_direction a.2 b.2⟩
zero_vadd := fun a => by
ext
exact zero_vadd _ _
add_vadd a b c := by
ext
apply add_vadd
vsub a b := ⟨(a : P) -ᵥ (b : P), (vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem a.2 _).mpr b.2⟩
vsub_vadd' a b := by
ext
apply AddTorsor.vsub_vadd'
vadd_vsub' a b := by
ext
apply AddTorsor.vadd_vsub'
#align affine_subspace.to_add_torsor AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
attribute [local instance] toAddTorsor
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_vsub (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (a b : s) : ↑(a -ᵥ b) = (a : P) -ᵥ (b : P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_vsub AffineSubspace.coe_vsub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_vadd (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (a : s.direction) (b : s) :
↑(a +ᵥ b) = (a : V) +ᵥ (b : P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_vadd AffineSubspace.coe_vadd
/-- Embedding of an affine subspace to the ambient space, as an affine map. -/
protected def subtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : s →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun := (↑)
linear := s.direction.subtype
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype AffineSubspace.subtype
@[simp]
theorem subtype_linear (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] :
s.subtype.linear = s.direction.subtype := rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype_linear AffineSubspace.subtype_linear
theorem subtype_apply (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (p : s) : s.subtype p = p :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype_apply AffineSubspace.subtype_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeSubtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : (s.subtype : s → P) = ((↑) : s → P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_subtype AffineSubspace.coeSubtype
theorem injective_subtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : Function.Injective s.subtype :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align affine_subspace.injective_subtype AffineSubspace.injective_subtype
/-- Two affine subspaces with nonempty intersection are equal if and only if their directions are
equal. -/
theorem eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁)
(h₂ : p ∈ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁.direction = s₂.direction :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext_of_direction_eq h ⟨p, h₁, h₂⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem AffineSubspace.eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem
/-- Construct an affine subspace from a point and a direction. -/
def mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : AffineSubspace k P where
carrier := { q | ∃ v ∈ direction, q = v +ᵥ p }
smul_vsub_vadd_mem c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3 := by
rcases hp1 with ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩
rcases hp2 with ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩
rcases hp3 with ⟨v3, hv3, hp3⟩
use c • (v1 - v2) + v3, direction.add_mem (direction.smul_mem c (direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2)) hv3
simp [hp1, hp2, hp3, vadd_vadd]
#align affine_subspace.mk' AffineSubspace.mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains that point. -/
theorem self_mem_mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨0, ⟨direction.zero_mem, (zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.self_mem_mk' AffineSubspace.self_mem_mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains the result of adding a
vector in that direction to that point. -/
theorem vadd_mem_mk' {v : V} (p : P) {direction : Submodule k V} (hv : v ∈ direction) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_mk' AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction is nonempty. -/
theorem mk'_nonempty (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : (mk' p direction : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨p, self_mem_mk' p direction⟩
#align affine_subspace.mk'_nonempty AffineSubspace.mk'_nonempty
/-- The direction of an affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) :
(mk' p direction).direction = direction := by
ext v
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub (mk'_nonempty _ _)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨p1, ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩, p2, ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩, hv⟩
rw [hv, hp1, hp2, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2
· exact fun hv => ⟨v +ᵥ p, vadd_mem_mk' _ hv, p, self_mem_mk' _ _, (vadd_vsub _ _).symm⟩
#align affine_subspace.direction_mk' AffineSubspace.direction_mk'
/-- A point lies in an affine subspace constructed from another point and a direction if and only
if their difference is in that direction. -/
theorem mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem {p₁ p₂ : P} {direction : Submodule k V} :
p₂ ∈ mk' p₁ direction ↔ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ ∈ direction := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← direction_mk' p₁ direction]
exact vsub_mem_direction h (self_mem_mk' _ _)
· rw [← vsub_vadd p₂ p₁]
exact vadd_mem_mk' p₁ h
#align affine_subspace.mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem AffineSubspace.mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem
/-- Constructing an affine subspace from a point in a subspace and that subspace's direction
yields the original subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) : mk' p s.direction = s :=
ext_of_direction_eq (direction_mk' p s.direction) ⟨p, Set.mem_inter (self_mem_mk' _ _) hp⟩
#align affine_subspace.mk'_eq AffineSubspace.mk'_eq
/-- If an affine subspace contains a set of points, it contains the `spanPoints` of that set. -/
theorem spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe {s : Set P} {s1 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s ⊆ s1) :
spanPoints k s ⊆ s1 := by
rintro p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, hp⟩
rw [hp]
have hp1s1 : p1 ∈ (s1 : Set P) := Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp1 h
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hp1s1
have hs : vectorSpan k s ≤ s1.direction := vectorSpan_mono k h
rw [SetLike.le_def] at hs
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hv hs
#align affine_subspace.span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe AffineSubspace.spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe
end AffineSubspace
namespace Submodule
variable {k V : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
@[simp]
theorem mem_toAffineSubspace {p : Submodule k V} {x : V} :
x ∈ p.toAffineSubspace ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toAffineSubspace_direction (s : Submodule k V) : s.toAffineSubspace.direction = s := by
ext x; simp [← s.toAffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ s.zero_mem]
end Submodule
theorem AffineMap.lineMap_mem {k V P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AddTorsor V P] {Q : AffineSubspace k P} {p₀ p₁ : P} (c : k) (h₀ : p₀ ∈ Q) (h₁ : p₁ ∈ Q) :
AffineMap.lineMap p₀ p₁ c ∈ Q := by
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply]
exact Q.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c h₁ h₀ h₀
#align affine_map.line_map_mem AffineMap.lineMap_mem
section affineSpan
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AffineSpace V P]
/-- The affine span of a set of points is the smallest affine subspace containing those points.
(Actually defined here in terms of spans in modules.) -/
def affineSpan (s : Set P) : AffineSubspace k P where
carrier := spanPoints k s
smul_vsub_vadd_mem c _ _ _ hp1 hp2 hp3 :=
vadd_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_vectorSpan k hp3
((vectorSpan k s).smul_mem c
(vsub_mem_vectorSpan_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints k hp1 hp2))
#align affine_span affineSpan
/-- The affine span, converted to a set, is `spanPoints`. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_affineSpan (s : Set P) : (affineSpan k s : Set P) = spanPoints k s :=
rfl
#align coe_affine_span coe_affineSpan
/-- A set is contained in its affine span. -/
theorem subset_affineSpan (s : Set P) : s ⊆ affineSpan k s :=
subset_spanPoints k s
#align subset_affine_span subset_affineSpan
/-- The direction of the affine span is the `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem direction_affineSpan (s : Set P) : (affineSpan k s).direction = vectorSpan k s := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
rintro v ⟨p1, ⟨p2, hp2, v1, hv1, hp1⟩, p3, ⟨p4, hp4, v2, hv2, hp3⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]
rw [hp1, hp3, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc]
exact
(vectorSpan k s).sub_mem ((vectorSpan k s).add_mem hv1 (vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp2 hp4)) hv2
· exact vectorSpan_mono k (subset_spanPoints k s)
#align direction_affine_span direction_affineSpan
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
theorem mem_affineSpan {p : P} {s : Set P} (hp : p ∈ s) : p ∈ affineSpan k s :=
mem_spanPoints k p s hp
#align mem_affine_span mem_affineSpan
end affineSpan
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[S : AffineSpace V P]
instance : CompleteLattice (AffineSubspace k P) :=
{
PartialOrder.lift ((↑) : AffineSubspace k P → Set P)
coe_injective with
sup := fun s1 s2 => affineSpan k (s1 ∪ s2)
le_sup_left := fun s1 s2 =>
Set.Subset.trans Set.subset_union_left (subset_spanPoints k _)
le_sup_right := fun s1 s2 =>
Set.Subset.trans Set.subset_union_right (subset_spanPoints k _)
sup_le := fun s1 s2 s3 hs1 hs2 => spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (Set.union_subset hs1 hs2)
inf := fun s1 s2 =>
mk (s1 ∩ s2) fun c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3 =>
⟨s1.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1.1 hp2.1 hp3.1, s2.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1.2 hp2.2 hp3.2⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ => Set.inter_subset_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ => Set.inter_subset_right
le_sInf := fun S s1 hs1 => by
-- Porting note: surely there is an easier way?
refine Set.subset_sInter (t := (s1 : Set P)) ?_
rintro t ⟨s, _hs, rfl⟩
exact Set.subset_iInter (hs1 s)
top :=
{ carrier := Set.univ
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => Set.mem_univ _ }
le_top := fun _ _ _ => Set.mem_univ _
bot :=
{ carrier := ∅
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := fun _ _ _ _ => False.elim }
bot_le := fun _ _ => False.elim
sSup := fun s => affineSpan k (⋃ s' ∈ s, (s' : Set P))
sInf := fun s =>
mk (⋂ s' ∈ s, (s' : Set P)) fun c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3 =>
Set.mem_iInter₂.2 fun s2 hs2 => by
rw [Set.mem_iInter₂] at *
exact s2.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c (hp1 s2 hs2) (hp2 s2 hs2) (hp3 s2 hs2)
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => Set.Subset.trans (Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem h) (subset_spanPoints k _)
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (Set.iUnion₂_subset h)
sInf_le := fun _ _ => Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => Set.subset_inter }
instance : Inhabited (AffineSubspace k P) :=
⟨⊤⟩
/-- The `≤` order on subspaces is the same as that on the corresponding sets. -/
theorem le_def (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : s1 ≤ s2 ↔ (s1 : Set P) ⊆ s2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.le_def AffineSubspace.le_def
/-- One subspace is less than or equal to another if and only if all its points are in the second
subspace. -/
theorem le_def' (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : s1 ≤ s2 ↔ ∀ p ∈ s1, p ∈ s2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.le_def' AffineSubspace.le_def'
/-- The `<` order on subspaces is the same as that on the corresponding sets. -/
theorem lt_def (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : s1 < s2 ↔ (s1 : Set P) ⊂ s2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.lt_def AffineSubspace.lt_def
/-- One subspace is not less than or equal to another if and only if it has a point not in the
second subspace. -/
theorem not_le_iff_exists (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : ¬s1 ≤ s2 ↔ ∃ p ∈ s1, p ∉ s2 :=
Set.not_subset
#align affine_subspace.not_le_iff_exists AffineSubspace.not_le_iff_exists
/-- If a subspace is less than another, there is a point only in the second. -/
theorem exists_of_lt {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s1 < s2) : ∃ p ∈ s2, p ∉ s1 :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align affine_subspace.exists_of_lt AffineSubspace.exists_of_lt
/-- A subspace is less than another if and only if it is less than or equal to the second subspace
and there is a point only in the second. -/
theorem lt_iff_le_and_exists (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) :
s1 < s2 ↔ s1 ≤ s2 ∧ ∃ p ∈ s2, p ∉ s1 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, not_le_iff_exists]
#align affine_subspace.lt_iff_le_and_exists AffineSubspace.lt_iff_le_and_exists
/-- If an affine subspace is nonempty and contained in another with the same direction, they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P}
(hd : s₁.direction = s₂.direction) (hn : (s₁ : Set P).Nonempty) (hle : s₁ ≤ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
let ⟨p, hp⟩ := hn
ext_of_direction_eq hd ⟨p, hp, hle hp⟩
#align affine_subspace.eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le AffineSubspace.eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le
variable (k V)
/-- The affine span is the `sInf` of subspaces containing the given points. -/
theorem affineSpan_eq_sInf (s : Set P) :
affineSpan k s = sInf { s' : AffineSubspace k P | s ⊆ s' } :=
le_antisymm (spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe <| Set.subset_iInter₂ fun _ => id)
(sInf_le (subset_spanPoints k _))
#align affine_subspace.affine_span_eq_Inf AffineSubspace.affineSpan_eq_sInf
variable (P)
/-- The Galois insertion formed by `affineSpan` and coercion back to a set. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (affineSpan k) ((↑) : AffineSubspace k P → Set P) where
choice s _ := affineSpan k s
gc s1 _s2 :=
⟨fun h => Set.Subset.trans (subset_spanPoints k s1) h, spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe⟩
le_l_u _ := subset_spanPoints k _
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
#align affine_subspace.gi AffineSubspace.gi
/-- The span of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : affineSpan k (∅ : Set P) = ⊥ :=
(AffineSubspace.gi k V P).gc.l_bot
#align affine_subspace.span_empty AffineSubspace.span_empty
/-- The span of `univ` is `⊤`. -/
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : affineSpan k (Set.univ : Set P) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| subset_spanPoints k _
#align affine_subspace.span_univ AffineSubspace.span_univ
variable {k V P}
theorem _root_.affineSpan_le {s : Set P} {Q : AffineSubspace k P} :
affineSpan k s ≤ Q ↔ s ⊆ (Q : Set P) :=
(AffineSubspace.gi k V P).gc _ _
#align affine_span_le affineSpan_le
variable (k V) {p₁ p₂ : P}
/-- The affine span of a single point, coerced to a set, contains just that point. -/
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: this needs to take priority over `coe_affineSpan`
theorem coe_affineSpan_singleton (p : P) : (affineSpan k ({p} : Set P) : Set P) = {p} := by
ext x
rw [mem_coe, ← vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_singleton p)) _,
direction_affineSpan]
simp
#align affine_subspace.coe_affine_span_singleton AffineSubspace.coe_affineSpan_singleton
/-- A point is in the affine span of a single point if and only if they are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_affineSpan_singleton : p₁ ∈ affineSpan k ({p₂} : Set P) ↔ p₁ = p₂ := by
simp [← mem_coe]
#align affine_subspace.mem_affine_span_singleton AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton (x : P) :
((↑) : affineSpan k ({x} : Set P) → P) ⁻¹' {x} = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun y => (AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton _ _).1 y.2
#align affine_subspace.preimage_coe_affine_span_singleton AffineSubspace.preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton
/-- The span of a union of sets is the sup of their spans. -/
theorem span_union (s t : Set P) : affineSpan k (s ∪ t) = affineSpan k s ⊔ affineSpan k t :=
(AffineSubspace.gi k V P).gc.l_sup
#align affine_subspace.span_union AffineSubspace.span_union
/-- The span of a union of an indexed family of sets is the sup of their spans. -/
theorem span_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : ι → Set P) :
affineSpan k (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, affineSpan k (s i) :=
(AffineSubspace.gi k V P).gc.l_iSup
#align affine_subspace.span_Union AffineSubspace.span_iUnion
variable (P)
/-- `⊤`, coerced to a set, is the whole set of points. -/
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : AffineSubspace k P) : Set P) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.top_coe AffineSubspace.top_coe
variable {P}
/-- All points are in `⊤`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (p : P) : p ∈ (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P) :=
Set.mem_univ p
#align affine_subspace.mem_top AffineSubspace.mem_top
variable (P)
/-- The direction of `⊤` is the whole module as a submodule. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_top : (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P).direction = ⊤ := by
cases' S.nonempty with p
ext v
refine ⟨imp_intro Submodule.mem_top, fun _hv => ?_⟩
have hpv : (v +ᵥ p -ᵥ p : V) ∈ (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P).direction :=
vsub_mem_direction (mem_top k V _) (mem_top k V _)
rwa [vadd_vsub] at hpv
#align affine_subspace.direction_top AffineSubspace.direction_top
/-- `⊥`, coerced to a set, is the empty set. -/
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : AffineSubspace k P) : Set P) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.bot_coe AffineSubspace.bot_coe
theorem bot_ne_top : (⊥ : AffineSubspace k P) ≠ ⊤ := by
intro contra
rw [← ext_iff, bot_coe, top_coe] at contra
exact Set.empty_ne_univ contra
#align affine_subspace.bot_ne_top AffineSubspace.bot_ne_top
instance : Nontrivial (AffineSubspace k P) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, bot_ne_top k V P⟩⟩
theorem nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top {s : Set P} (h : affineSpan k s = ⊤) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
rintro rfl
rw [AffineSubspace.span_empty] at h
exact bot_ne_top k V P h
#align affine_subspace.nonempty_of_affine_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top
/-- If the affine span of a set is `⊤`, then the vector span of the same set is the `⊤`. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_top_of_affineSpan_eq_top {s : Set P} (h : affineSpan k s = ⊤) :
vectorSpan k s = ⊤ := by rw [← direction_affineSpan, h, direction_top]
#align affine_subspace.vector_span_eq_top_of_affine_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.vectorSpan_eq_top_of_affineSpan_eq_top
/-- For a nonempty set, the affine span is `⊤` iff its vector span is `⊤`. -/
theorem affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nonempty {s : Set P} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
affineSpan k s = ⊤ ↔ vectorSpan k s = ⊤ := by
refine ⟨vectorSpan_eq_top_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P, ?_⟩
intro h
suffices Nonempty (affineSpan k s) by
obtain ⟨p, hp : p ∈ affineSpan k s⟩ := this
rw [eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem hp (mem_top k V p), direction_affineSpan, h, direction_top]
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
exact ⟨⟨x, mem_affineSpan k hx⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.affine_span_eq_top_iff_vector_span_eq_top_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nonempty
/-- For a non-trivial space, the affine span of a set is `⊤` iff its vector span is `⊤`. -/
theorem affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nontrivial {s : Set P} [Nontrivial P] :
affineSpan k s = ⊤ ↔ vectorSpan k s = ⊤ := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· simp [hs, subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, AddTorsor.subsingleton_iff V P, not_subsingleton]
· rw [affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nonempty k V P hs]
#align affine_subspace.affine_span_eq_top_iff_vector_span_eq_top_of_nontrivial AffineSubspace.affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nontrivial
theorem card_pos_of_affineSpan_eq_top {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {p : ι → P}
(h : affineSpan k (range p) = ⊤) : 0 < Fintype.card ι := by
obtain ⟨-, ⟨i, -⟩⟩ := nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P h
exact Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨i⟩
#align affine_subspace.card_pos_of_affine_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.card_pos_of_affineSpan_eq_top
attribute [local instance] toAddTorsor
/-- The top affine subspace is linearly equivalent to the affine space.
This is the affine version of `Submodule.topEquiv`. -/
@[simps! linear apply symm_apply_coe]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P) ≃ᵃ[k] P where
toEquiv := Equiv.Set.univ P
linear := .ofEq _ _ (direction_top _ _ _) ≪≫ₗ Submodule.topEquiv
map_vadd' _p _v := rfl
variable {P}
/-- No points are in `⊥`. -/
theorem not_mem_bot (p : P) : p ∉ (⊥ : AffineSubspace k P) :=
Set.not_mem_empty p
#align affine_subspace.not_mem_bot AffineSubspace.not_mem_bot
variable (P)
/-- The direction of `⊥` is the submodule `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_bot : (⊥ : AffineSubspace k P).direction = ⊥ := by
rw [direction_eq_vectorSpan, bot_coe, vectorSpan_def, vsub_empty, Submodule.span_empty]
#align affine_subspace.direction_bot AffineSubspace.direction_bot
variable {k V P}
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_bot_iff (Q : AffineSubspace k P) : (Q : Set P) = ∅ ↔ Q = ⊥ :=
coe_injective.eq_iff' (bot_coe _ _ _)
#align affine_subspace.coe_eq_bot_iff AffineSubspace.coe_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_univ_iff (Q : AffineSubspace k P) : (Q : Set P) = univ ↔ Q = ⊤ :=
coe_injective.eq_iff' (top_coe _ _ _)
#align affine_subspace.coe_eq_univ_iff AffineSubspace.coe_eq_univ_iff
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_bot (Q : AffineSubspace k P) : (Q : Set P).Nonempty ↔ Q ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
exact not_congr Q.coe_eq_bot_iff
#align affine_subspace.nonempty_iff_ne_bot AffineSubspace.nonempty_iff_ne_bot
theorem eq_bot_or_nonempty (Q : AffineSubspace k P) : Q = ⊥ ∨ (Q : Set P).Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_bot]
apply eq_or_ne
#align affine_subspace.eq_bot_or_nonempty AffineSubspace.eq_bot_or_nonempty
theorem subsingleton_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top {s : Set P} (h₁ : s.Subsingleton)
(h₂ : affineSpan k s = ⊤) : Subsingleton P := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := AffineSubspace.nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P h₂
have : s = {p} := Subset.antisymm (fun q hq => h₁ hq hp) (by simp [hp])
rw [this, ← AffineSubspace.ext_iff, AffineSubspace.coe_affineSpan_singleton,
AffineSubspace.top_coe, eq_comm, ← subsingleton_iff_singleton (mem_univ _)] at h₂
exact subsingleton_of_univ_subsingleton h₂
#align affine_subspace.subsingleton_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.subsingleton_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top
theorem eq_univ_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top {s : Set P} (h₁ : s.Subsingleton)
(h₂ : affineSpan k s = ⊤) : s = (univ : Set P) := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := AffineSubspace.nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P h₂
have : s = {p} := Subset.antisymm (fun q hq => h₁ hq hp) (by simp [hp])
rw [this, eq_comm, ← subsingleton_iff_singleton (mem_univ p), subsingleton_univ_iff]
exact subsingleton_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top h₁ h₂
#align affine_subspace.eq_univ_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.eq_univ_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top
/-- A nonempty affine subspace is `⊤` if and only if its direction is `⊤`. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
s.direction = ⊤ ↔ s = ⊤ := by
constructor
· intro hd
rw [← direction_top k V P] at hd
refine ext_of_direction_eq hd ?_
simp [h]
· rintro rfl
simp
#align affine_subspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty
/-- The inf of two affine subspaces, coerced to a set, is the intersection of the two sets of
points. -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : (s1 ⊓ s2 : Set P) = (s1 : Set P) ∩ s2 :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.inf_coe AffineSubspace.inf_coe
/-- A point is in the inf of two affine subspaces if and only if it is in both of them. -/
theorem mem_inf_iff (p : P) (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : p ∈ s1 ⊓ s2 ↔ p ∈ s1 ∧ p ∈ s2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.mem_inf_iff AffineSubspace.mem_inf_iff
/-- The direction of the inf of two affine subspaces is less than or equal to the inf of their
directions. -/
theorem direction_inf (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) :
(s1 ⊓ s2).direction ≤ s1.direction ⊓ s2.direction := by
simp only [direction_eq_vectorSpan, vectorSpan_def]
exact
le_inf (sInf_le_sInf fun p hp => trans (vsub_self_mono inter_subset_left) hp)
(sInf_le_sInf fun p hp => trans (vsub_self_mono inter_subset_right) hp)
#align affine_subspace.direction_inf AffineSubspace.direction_inf
/-- If two affine subspaces have a point in common, the direction of their inf equals the inf of
their directions. -/
theorem direction_inf_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁) (h₂ : p ∈ s₂) :
(s₁ ⊓ s₂).direction = s₁.direction ⊓ s₂.direction := by
ext v
rw [Submodule.mem_inf, ← vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v h₁, ← vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v h₂, ←
vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩), mem_inf_iff]
#align affine_subspace.direction_inf_of_mem AffineSubspace.direction_inf_of_mem
/-- If two affine subspaces have a point in their inf, the direction of their inf equals the inf of
their directions. -/
theorem direction_inf_of_mem_inf {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (h : p ∈ s₁ ⊓ s₂) :
(s₁ ⊓ s₂).direction = s₁.direction ⊓ s₂.direction :=
direction_inf_of_mem ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).1 h).1 ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).1 h).2
#align affine_subspace.direction_inf_of_mem_inf AffineSubspace.direction_inf_of_mem_inf
/-- If one affine subspace is less than or equal to another, the same applies to their
directions. -/
theorem direction_le {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s1 ≤ s2) : s1.direction ≤ s2.direction := by
simp only [direction_eq_vectorSpan, vectorSpan_def]
exact vectorSpan_mono k h
#align affine_subspace.direction_le AffineSubspace.direction_le
/-- If one nonempty affine subspace is less than another, the same applies to their directions -/
theorem direction_lt_of_nonempty {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s1 < s2)
(hn : (s1 : Set P).Nonempty) : s1.direction < s2.direction := by
cases' hn with p hp
rw [lt_iff_le_and_exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨hle, p2, hp2, hp2s1⟩
rw [SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists]
use direction_le hle, p2 -ᵥ p, vsub_mem_direction hp2 (hle hp)
intro hm
rw [vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp p2] at hm
exact hp2s1 hm
#align affine_subspace.direction_lt_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.direction_lt_of_nonempty
/-- The sup of the directions of two affine subspaces is less than or equal to the direction of
their sup. -/
theorem sup_direction_le (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) :
s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction ≤ (s1 ⊔ s2).direction := by
simp only [direction_eq_vectorSpan, vectorSpan_def]
exact
sup_le
(sInf_le_sInf fun p hp => Set.Subset.trans (vsub_self_mono (le_sup_left : s1 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2)) hp)
(sInf_le_sInf fun p hp => Set.Subset.trans (vsub_self_mono (le_sup_right : s2 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2)) hp)
#align affine_subspace.sup_direction_le AffineSubspace.sup_direction_le
/-- The sup of the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces with empty intersection is less than
the direction of their sup. -/
theorem sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : Set P).Nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : Set P).Nonempty) (he : (s1 ∩ s2 : Set P) = ∅) :
s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction < (s1 ⊔ s2).direction := by
cases' h1 with p1 hp1
cases' h2 with p2 hp2
rw [SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists]
use sup_direction_le s1 s2, p2 -ᵥ p1,
vsub_mem_direction ((le_sup_right : s2 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2) hp2) ((le_sup_left : s1 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2) hp1)
intro h
rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at h
rcases h with ⟨v1, hv1, v2, hv2, hv1v2⟩
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_comm v1, add_assoc, ←
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_neg v2, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub,
vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hv1v2
refine Set.Nonempty.ne_empty ?_ he
use v1 +ᵥ p1, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv1 hp1
rw [hv1v2]
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv2) hp2
#align affine_subspace.sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty AffineSubspace.sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty
/-- If the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces span the whole module, they have nonempty
intersection. -/
theorem inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : Set P).Nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : Set P).Nonempty)
(hd : s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction = ⊤) : ((s1 : Set P) ∩ s2).Nonempty := by
by_contra h
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at h
have hlt := sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty h1 h2 h
rw [hd] at hlt
exact not_top_lt hlt
#align affine_subspace.inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top AffineSubspace.inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top
/-- If the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces are complements of each other, they intersect
in exactly one point. -/
theorem inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_isCompl {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : Set P).Nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : Set P).Nonempty)
(hd : IsCompl s1.direction s2.direction) : ∃ p, (s1 : Set P) ∩ s2 = {p} := by
cases' inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top h1 h2 hd.sup_eq_top with p hp
use p
ext q
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hq1, hq2⟩
have hqp : q -ᵥ p ∈ s1.direction ⊓ s2.direction :=
⟨vsub_mem_direction hq1 hp.1, vsub_mem_direction hq2 hp.2⟩
rwa [hd.inf_eq_bot, Submodule.mem_bot, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hqp
· exact fun h => h.symm ▸ hp
#align affine_subspace.inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_is_compl AffineSubspace.inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_isCompl
/-- Coercing a subspace to a set then taking the affine span produces the original subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineSpan_coe (s : AffineSubspace k P) : affineSpan k (s : Set P) = s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (subset_spanPoints _ _)
rintro p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, rfl⟩
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp1
#align affine_subspace.affine_span_coe AffineSubspace.affineSpan_coe
end AffineSubspace
section AffineSpace'
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*}
open AffineSubspace Set
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the left. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k ((p -ᵥ ·) '' s) := by
rw [vectorSpan_def]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_mono ?_)
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro v ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩
simp_rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p1 p2 p] at hv
rw [← hv, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_span]
exact fun m hm => Submodule.sub_mem _ (hm ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩) (hm ⟨p1, hp1, rfl⟩)
· rintro v ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩
exact ⟨p, hp, p2, hp2, hv⟩
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the right. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k ((· -ᵥ p) '' s) := by
rw [vectorSpan_def]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_mono ?_)
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro v ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩
simp_rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p1 p2 p] at hv
rw [← hv, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_span]
exact fun m hm => Submodule.sub_mem _ (hm ⟨p1, hp1, rfl⟩) (hm ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩)
· rintro v ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩
exact ⟨p2, hp2, p, hp, hv⟩
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the left,
excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k ((p -ᵥ ·) '' (s \ {p})) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left k hp, ← Set.insert_eq_of_mem hp, ←
Set.insert_diff_singleton, Set.image_insert_eq]
simp [Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the right,
excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k ((· -ᵥ p) '' (s \ {p})) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k hp, ← Set.insert_eq_of_mem hp, ←
Set.insert_diff_singleton, Set.image_insert_eq]
simp [Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the right,
excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne [DecidableEq P] [DecidableEq V] {s : Finset P}
{p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k (s : Set P) = Submodule.span k ((s.erase p).image (· -ᵥ p)) := by
simp [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne _ (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hp)]
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` of the image of a function is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the left, excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne (p : ι → P) {s : Set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k (p '' s) = Submodule.span k ((p i -ᵥ ·) '' (p '' (s \ {i}))) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (Set.mem_image_of_mem p hi), ← Set.insert_eq_of_mem hi, ←
Set.insert_diff_singleton, Set.image_insert_eq, Set.image_insert_eq]
simp [Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
#align vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` of the image of a function is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the right, excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne (p : ι → P) {s : Set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k (p '' s) = Submodule.span k ((· -ᵥ p i) '' (p '' (s \ {i}))) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (Set.mem_image_of_mem p hi), ← Set.insert_eq_of_mem hi,
← Set.insert_diff_singleton, Set.image_insert_eq, Set.image_insert_eq]
simp [Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
#align vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given
point on the left. -/
theorem vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left (p : ι → P) (i0 : ι) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) = Submodule.span k (Set.range fun i : ι => p i0 -ᵥ p i) := by
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (Set.mem_range_self i0), ← Set.range_comp]
congr
#align vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given
point on the right. -/
theorem vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right (p : ι → P) (i0 : ι) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) = Submodule.span k (Set.range fun i : ι => p i -ᵥ p i0) := by
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (Set.mem_range_self i0), ← Set.range_comp]
congr
#align vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given
point on the left, excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left_ne (p : ι → P) (i₀ : ι) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) =
Submodule.span k (Set.range fun i : { x // x ≠ i₀ } => p i₀ -ᵥ p i) := by
rw [← Set.image_univ, vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne k _ (Set.mem_univ i₀)]
congr with v
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, ⟨i₁, ⟨⟨_, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hv⟩
exact ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩
· exact fun ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩ => ⟨p i₁, ⟨i₁, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩, hv⟩
#align vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left_ne vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given
point on the right, excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne (p : ι → P) (i₀ : ι) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) =
Submodule.span k (Set.range fun i : { x // x ≠ i₀ } => p i -ᵥ p i₀) := by
rw [← Set.image_univ, vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne k _ (Set.mem_univ i₀)]
congr with v
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, ⟨i₁, ⟨⟨_, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hv⟩
exact ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩
· exact fun ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩ => ⟨p i₁, ⟨i₁, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩, hv⟩
#align vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne
section
variable {s : Set P}
/-- The affine span of a set is nonempty if and only if that set is. -/
theorem affineSpan_nonempty : (affineSpan k s : Set P).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
spanPoints_nonempty k s
#align affine_span_nonempty affineSpan_nonempty
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.affineSpan⟩ := affineSpan_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.affine_span Set.Nonempty.affineSpan
/-- The affine span of a nonempty set is nonempty. -/
instance [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (affineSpan k s) :=
((nonempty_coe_sort.1 ‹_›).affineSpan _).to_subtype
/-- The affine span of a set is `⊥` if and only if that set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineSpan_eq_bot : affineSpan k s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_bot, affineSpan_nonempty,
nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align affine_span_eq_bot affineSpan_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_lt_affineSpan : ⊥ < affineSpan k s ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
exact (affineSpan_eq_bot _).not
#align bot_lt_affine_span bot_lt_affineSpan
end
variable {k}
/-- An induction principle for span membership. If `p` holds for all elements of `s` and is
preserved under certain affine combinations, then `p` holds for all elements of the span of `s`. -/
theorem affineSpan_induction {x : P} {s : Set P} {p : P → Prop} (h : x ∈ affineSpan k s)
(mem : ∀ x : P, x ∈ s → p x)
(smul_vsub_vadd : ∀ (c : k) (u v w : P), p u → p v → p w → p (c • (u -ᵥ v) +ᵥ w)) : p x :=
(affineSpan_le (Q := ⟨p, smul_vsub_vadd⟩)).mpr mem h
#align affine_span_induction affineSpan_induction
/-- A dependent version of `affineSpan_induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem affineSpan_induction' {s : Set P} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ affineSpan k s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (y) (hys : y ∈ s), p y (subset_affineSpan k _ hys))
(smul_vsub_vadd :
∀ (c : k) (u hu v hv w hw),
p u hu →
p v hv → p w hw → p (c • (u -ᵥ v) +ᵥ w) (AffineSubspace.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ hu hv hw))
{x : P} (h : x ∈ affineSpan k s) : p x h := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ affineSpan k s) (hc : p x hx) => hc
-- Porting note: Lean couldn't infer the motive
refine affineSpan_induction (p := fun y => ∃ z, p y z) h ?_ ?_
· exact fun y hy => ⟨subset_affineSpan _ _ hy, mem y hy⟩
· exact fun c u v w hu hv hw =>
Exists.elim hu fun hu' hu =>
Exists.elim hv fun hv' hv =>
Exists.elim hw fun hw' hw =>
⟨AffineSubspace.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ hu' hv' hw',
smul_vsub_vadd _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hu hv hw⟩
#align affine_span_induction' affineSpan_induction'
section WithLocalInstance
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
/-- A set, considered as a subset of its spanned affine subspace, spans the whole subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineSpan_coe_preimage_eq_top (A : Set P) [Nonempty A] :
affineSpan k (((↑) : affineSpan k A → P) ⁻¹' A) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ -
refine affineSpan_induction' (fun y hy ↦ ?_) (fun c u hu v hv w hw ↦ ?_) hx
· exact subset_affineSpan _ _ hy
· exact AffineSubspace.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _
#align affine_span_coe_preimage_eq_top affineSpan_coe_preimage_eq_top
end WithLocalInstance
/-- Suppose a set of vectors spans `V`. Then a point `p`, together with those vectors added to `p`,
spans `P`. -/
theorem affineSpan_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top {s : Set V} (p : P)
(h : Submodule.span k (Set.range ((↑) : s → V)) = ⊤) :
affineSpan k ({p} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p) '' s) = ⊤ := by
convert ext_of_direction_eq _
⟨p, mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton _)), mem_top k V p⟩
rw [direction_affineSpan, direction_top,
vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton _) : p ∈ _),
eq_top_iff, ← h]
apply Submodule.span_mono
rintro v ⟨v', rfl⟩
use (v' : V) +ᵥ p
simp
#align affine_span_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top affineSpan_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top
variable (k)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of two points is the span of their difference. -/
theorem vectorSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = k ∙ p₁ -ᵥ p₂ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (mem_insert p₁ _), image_pair, vsub_self,
Submodule.span_insert_zero]
#align vector_span_pair vectorSpan_pair
/-- The `vectorSpan` of two points is the span of their difference (reversed). -/
theorem vectorSpan_pair_rev (p₁ p₂ : P) : vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = k ∙ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ := by
rw [pair_comm, vectorSpan_pair]
#align vector_span_pair_rev vectorSpan_pair_rev
/-- The difference between two points lies in their `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ p₂ ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) :=
vsub_mem_vectorSpan _ (Set.mem_insert _ _) (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _))
#align vsub_mem_vector_span_pair vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- The difference between two points (reversed) lies in their `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₂ -ᵥ p₁ ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) :=
vsub_mem_vectorSpan _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _)) (Set.mem_insert _ _)
#align vsub_rev_mem_vector_span_pair vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair
variable {k}
/-- A multiple of the difference between two points lies in their `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem smul_vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
r • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) :=
Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair k p₁ p₂)
#align smul_vsub_mem_vector_span_pair smul_vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- A multiple of the difference between two points (reversed) lies in their `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
r • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) :=
Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair k p₁ p₂)
#align smul_vsub_rev_mem_vector_span_pair smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- A vector lies in the `vectorSpan` of two points if and only if it is a multiple of their
difference. -/
theorem mem_vectorSpan_pair {p₁ p₂ : P} {v : V} :
v ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) ↔ ∃ r : k, r • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) = v := by
rw [vectorSpan_pair, Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
#align mem_vector_span_pair mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- A vector lies in the `vectorSpan` of two points if and only if it is a multiple of their
difference (reversed). -/
theorem mem_vectorSpan_pair_rev {p₁ p₂ : P} {v : V} :
v ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) ↔ ∃ r : k, r • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) = v := by
rw [vectorSpan_pair_rev, Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
#align mem_vector_span_pair_rev mem_vectorSpan_pair_rev
variable (k)
/-- The line between two points, as an affine subspace. -/
notation "line[" k ", " p₁ ", " p₂ "]" =>
affineSpan k (insert p₁ (@singleton _ _ Set.instSingletonSet p₂))
/-- The first of two points lies in their affine span. -/
theorem left_mem_affineSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
mem_affineSpan _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)
#align left_mem_affine_span_pair left_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- The second of two points lies in their affine span. -/
theorem right_mem_affineSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₂ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
mem_affineSpan _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _))
#align right_mem_affine_span_pair right_mem_affineSpan_pair
variable {k}
/-- A combination of two points expressed with `lineMap` lies in their affine span. -/
theorem AffineMap.lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
AffineMap.lineMap p₁ p₂ r ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
AffineMap.lineMap_mem _ (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _) (right_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _)
#align affine_map.line_map_mem_affine_span_pair AffineMap.lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A combination of two points expressed with `lineMap` (with the two points reversed) lies in
their affine span. -/
theorem AffineMap.lineMap_rev_mem_affineSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
AffineMap.lineMap p₂ p₁ r ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
AffineMap.lineMap_mem _ (right_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _) (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _)
#align affine_map.line_map_rev_mem_affine_span_pair AffineMap.lineMap_rev_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A multiple of the difference of two points added to the first point lies in their affine
span. -/
theorem smul_vsub_vadd_mem_affineSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
r • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₁ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
AffineMap.lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align smul_vsub_vadd_mem_affine_span_pair smul_vsub_vadd_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A multiple of the difference of two points added to the second point lies in their affine
span. -/
theorem smul_vsub_rev_vadd_mem_affineSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
r • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) +ᵥ p₂ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
AffineMap.lineMap_rev_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align smul_vsub_rev_vadd_mem_affine_span_pair smul_vsub_rev_vadd_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A vector added to the first point lies in the affine span of two points if and only if it is
a multiple of their difference. -/
theorem vadd_left_mem_affineSpan_pair {p₁ p₂ : P} {v : V} :
v +ᵥ p₁ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] ↔ ∃ r : k, r • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) = v := by
rw [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _), direction_affineSpan,
mem_vectorSpan_pair_rev]
#align vadd_left_mem_affine_span_pair vadd_left_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A vector added to the second point lies in the affine span of two points if and only if it is
a multiple of their difference. -/
theorem vadd_right_mem_affineSpan_pair {p₁ p₂ : P} {v : V} :
v +ᵥ p₂ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] ↔ ∃ r : k, r • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) = v := by
rw [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ (right_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _), direction_affineSpan,
mem_vectorSpan_pair]
#align vadd_right_mem_affine_span_pair vadd_right_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- The span of two points that lie in an affine subspace is contained in that subspace. -/
theorem affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem {p₁ p₂ : P} {s : AffineSubspace k P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : line[k, p₁, p₂] ≤ s := by
rw [affineSpan_le, Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩
#align affine_span_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem
/-- One line is contained in another differing in the first point if the first point of the first
line is contained in the second line. -/
theorem affineSpan_pair_le_of_left_mem {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ line[k, p₂, p₃]) :
line[k, p₁, p₃] ≤ line[k, p₂, p₃] :=
affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem h (right_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _)
#align affine_span_pair_le_of_left_mem affineSpan_pair_le_of_left_mem
/-- One line is contained in another differing in the second point if the second point of the
first line is contained in the second line. -/
theorem affineSpan_pair_le_of_right_mem {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ line[k, p₂, p₃]) :
line[k, p₂, p₁] ≤ line[k, p₂, p₃] :=
affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _) h
#align affine_span_pair_le_of_right_mem affineSpan_pair_le_of_right_mem
variable (k)
/-- `affineSpan` is monotone. -/
@[mono]
theorem affineSpan_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : affineSpan k s₁ ≤ affineSpan k s₂ :=
spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (Set.Subset.trans h (subset_affineSpan k _))
#align affine_span_mono affineSpan_mono
/-- Taking the affine span of a set, adding a point and taking the span again produces the same
results as adding the point to the set and taking the span. -/
theorem affineSpan_insert_affineSpan (p : P) (ps : Set P) :
affineSpan k (insert p (affineSpan k ps : Set P)) = affineSpan k (insert p ps) := by
rw [Set.insert_eq, Set.insert_eq, span_union, span_union, affineSpan_coe]
#align affine_span_insert_affine_span affineSpan_insert_affineSpan
/-- If a point is in the affine span of a set, adding it to that set does not change the affine
span. -/
theorem affineSpan_insert_eq_affineSpan {p : P} {ps : Set P} (h : p ∈ affineSpan k ps) :
affineSpan k (insert p ps) = affineSpan k ps := by
rw [← mem_coe] at h
rw [← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan, Set.insert_eq_of_mem h, affineSpan_coe]
#align affine_span_insert_eq_affine_span affineSpan_insert_eq_affineSpan
variable {k}
/-- If a point is in the affine span of a set, adding it to that set does not change the vector
span. -/
theorem vectorSpan_insert_eq_vectorSpan {p : P} {ps : Set P} (h : p ∈ affineSpan k ps) :
vectorSpan k (insert p ps) = vectorSpan k ps := by
simp_rw [← direction_affineSpan, affineSpan_insert_eq_affineSpan _ h]
#align vector_span_insert_eq_vector_span vectorSpan_insert_eq_vectorSpan
/-- When the affine space is also a vector space, the affine span is contained within the linear
span. -/
lemma affineSpan_le_toAffineSubspace_span {s : Set V} :
affineSpan k s ≤ (Submodule.span k s).toAffineSubspace := by
intro x hx
show x ∈ Submodule.span k s
induction hx using affineSpan_induction' with
| mem x hx => exact Submodule.subset_span hx
| smul_vsub_vadd c u _ v _ w _ hu hv hw =>
simp only [vsub_eq_sub, vadd_eq_add]
apply Submodule.add_mem _ _ hw
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.sub_mem _ hu hv)
lemma affineSpan_subset_span {s : Set V} :
(affineSpan k s : Set V) ⊆ Submodule.span k s :=
affineSpan_le_toAffineSubspace_span
end AffineSpace'
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AffineSpace V P]
/-- The direction of the sup of two nonempty affine subspaces is the sup of the two directions and
of any one difference between points in the two subspaces. -/
theorem direction_sup {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s1) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s2) :
(s1 ⊔ s2).direction = s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction ⊔ k ∙ p2 -ᵥ p1 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· change (affineSpan k ((s1 : Set P) ∪ s2)).direction ≤ _
rw [← mem_coe] at hp1
rw [direction_affineSpan, vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (Set.mem_union_left _ hp1),
Submodule.span_le]
rintro v ⟨p3, hp3, rfl⟩
cases' hp3 with hp3 hp3
· rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_sup]
use 0, Submodule.zero_mem _, p3 -ᵥ p1, vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp1
rw [zero_add]
· rw [sup_assoc, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_sup]
use 0, Submodule.zero_mem _, p3 -ᵥ p1
rw [and_comm, zero_add]
use rfl
rw [← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p3 p2 p1, Submodule.mem_sup]
use p3 -ᵥ p2, vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp2, p2 -ᵥ p1, Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self _
· refine sup_le (sup_direction_le _ _) ?_
rw [direction_eq_vectorSpan, vectorSpan_def]
exact
sInf_le_sInf fun p hp =>
Set.Subset.trans
(Set.singleton_subset_iff.2
(vsub_mem_vsub (mem_spanPoints k p2 _ (Set.mem_union_right _ hp2))
(mem_spanPoints k p1 _ (Set.mem_union_left _ hp1))))
hp
#align affine_subspace.direction_sup AffineSubspace.direction_sup
/-- The direction of the span of the result of adding a point to a nonempty affine subspace is the
sup of the direction of that subspace and of any one difference between that point and a point in
the subspace. -/
theorem direction_affineSpan_insert {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) :
(affineSpan k (insert p2 (s : Set P))).direction =
Submodule.span k {p2 -ᵥ p1} ⊔ s.direction := by
rw [sup_comm, ← Set.union_singleton, ← coe_affineSpan_singleton k V p2]
change (s ⊔ affineSpan k {p2}).direction = _
rw [direction_sup hp1 (mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_singleton _)), direction_affineSpan]
simp
#align affine_subspace.direction_affine_span_insert AffineSubspace.direction_affineSpan_insert
/-- Given a point `p1` in an affine subspace `s`, and a point `p2`, a point `p` is in the span of
`s` with `p2` added if and only if it is a multiple of `p2 -ᵥ p1` added to a point in `s`. -/
theorem mem_affineSpan_insert_iff {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p1 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (p2 p : P) :
p ∈ affineSpan k (insert p2 (s : Set P)) ↔
∃ r : k, ∃ p0 ∈ s, p = r • (p2 -ᵥ p1 : V) +ᵥ p0 := by
rw [← mem_coe] at hp1
rw [← vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp1)),
direction_affineSpan_insert hp1, Submodule.mem_sup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨v1, hv1, v2, hv2, hp⟩
rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton] at hv1
rcases hv1 with ⟨r, rfl⟩
use r, v2 +ᵥ p1, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv2 hp1
symm at hp
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hp
rw [hp, vadd_vadd]
· rintro ⟨r, p3, hp3, rfl⟩
use r • (p2 -ᵥ p1), Submodule.mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨r, rfl⟩, p3 -ᵥ p1,
vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp1
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc]
#align affine_subspace.mem_affine_span_insert_iff AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_insert_iff
end AffineSubspace
section MapComap
variable {k V₁ P₁ V₂ P₂ V₃ P₃ : Type*} [Ring k]
variable [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module k V₁] [AddTorsor V₁ P₁]
variable [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AddTorsor V₂ P₂]
variable [AddCommGroup V₃] [Module k V₃] [AddTorsor V₃ P₃]
section
variable (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂)
@[simp]
theorem AffineMap.vectorSpan_image_eq_submodule_map {s : Set P₁} :
Submodule.map f.linear (vectorSpan k s) = vectorSpan k (f '' s) := by
rw [vectorSpan_def, vectorSpan_def, f.image_vsub_image, Submodule.span_image]
-- Porting note: Lean unfolds things too far with `simp` here.
#align affine_map.vector_span_image_eq_submodule_map AffineMap.vectorSpan_image_eq_submodule_map
namespace AffineSubspace
/-- The image of an affine subspace under an affine map as an affine subspace. -/
def map (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) : AffineSubspace k P₂ where
carrier := f '' s
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := by
rintro t - - - ⟨p₁, h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨p₂, h₂, rfl⟩ ⟨p₃, h₃, rfl⟩
use t • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) +ᵥ p₃
suffices t • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) +ᵥ p₃ ∈ s by
{ simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, true_and, this]
rw [AffineMap.map_vadd, map_smul, AffineMap.linearMap_vsub] }
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem t h₁ h₂ h₃
#align affine_subspace.map AffineSubspace.map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) : (s.map f : Set P₂) = f '' s :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_map AffineSubspace.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂} {x : P₂} {s : AffineSubspace k P₁} :
x ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.mem_map AffineSubspace.mem_map
theorem mem_map_of_mem {x : P₁} {s : AffineSubspace k P₁} (h : x ∈ s) : f x ∈ s.map f :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align affine_subspace.mem_map_of_mem AffineSubspace.mem_map_of_mem
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `AffineSubspace.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective {f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂} {x : P₁} {s : AffineSubspace k P₁}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : f x ∈ s.map f ↔ x ∈ s :=
hf.mem_set_image
#align affine_subspace.mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective AffineSubspace.mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : AffineSubspace k P₁).map f = ⊥ :=
coe_injective <| image_empty f
#align affine_subspace.map_bot AffineSubspace.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff {s : AffineSubspace k P₁} : s.map f = ⊥ ↔ s = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rwa [← coe_eq_bot_iff, coe_map, image_eq_empty, coe_eq_bot_iff] at h
· rw [h, map_bot]
#align affine_subspace.map_eq_bot_iff AffineSubspace.map_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) : s.map (AffineMap.id k P₁) = s :=
coe_injective <| image_id _
#align affine_subspace.map_id AffineSubspace.map_id
theorem map_map (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (g : P₂ →ᵃ[k] P₃) :
(s.map f).map g = s.map (g.comp f) :=
coe_injective <| image_image _ _ _
#align affine_subspace.map_map AffineSubspace.map_map
@[simp]
theorem map_direction (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) :
(s.map f).direction = s.direction.map f.linear := by
rw [direction_eq_vectorSpan, direction_eq_vectorSpan, coe_map,
AffineMap.vectorSpan_image_eq_submodule_map]
-- Porting note: again, Lean unfolds too aggressively with `simp`
#align affine_subspace.map_direction AffineSubspace.map_direction
theorem map_span (s : Set P₁) : (affineSpan k s).map f = affineSpan k (f '' s) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨p, hp⟩);
· rw [image_empty, span_empty, span_empty, map_bot]
-- Porting note: I don't know exactly why this `simp` was broken.
apply ext_of_direction_eq
· simp [direction_affineSpan]
· exact
⟨f p, mem_image_of_mem f (subset_affineSpan k _ hp),
subset_affineSpan k _ (mem_image_of_mem f hp)⟩
#align affine_subspace.map_span AffineSubspace.map_span
section inclusion
variable {S₁ S₂ : AffineSubspace k P₁} [Nonempty S₁] [Nonempty S₂]
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
/-- Affine map from a smaller to a larger subspace of the same space.
This is the affine version of `Submodule.inclusion`. -/
@[simps linear]
def inclusion (h : S₁ ≤ S₂) : S₁ →ᵃ[k] S₂ where
toFun := Set.inclusion h
linear := Submodule.inclusion <| AffineSubspace.direction_le h
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion_apply (h : S₁ ≤ S₂) (x : S₁) : (inclusion h x : P₁) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inclusion_rfl : inclusion (le_refl S₁) = AffineMap.id k S₁ := rfl
end inclusion
end AffineSubspace
namespace AffineMap
@[simp]
theorem map_top_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : AffineSubspace.map f ⊤ = ⊤ := by
rw [← AffineSubspace.ext_iff]
exact image_univ_of_surjective hf
#align affine_map.map_top_of_surjective AffineMap.map_top_of_surjective
theorem span_eq_top_of_surjective {s : Set P₁} (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(h : affineSpan k s = ⊤) : affineSpan k (f '' s) = ⊤ := by
rw [← AffineSubspace.map_span, h, map_top_of_surjective f hf]
#align affine_map.span_eq_top_of_surjective AffineMap.span_eq_top_of_surjective
end AffineMap
namespace AffineEquiv
section ofEq
variable (S₁ S₂ : AffineSubspace k P₁) [Nonempty S₁] [Nonempty S₂]
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
/-- Affine equivalence between two equal affine subspace.
This is the affine version of `LinearEquiv.ofEq`. -/
@[simps linear]
def ofEq (h : S₁ = S₂) : S₁ ≃ᵃ[k] S₂ where
toEquiv := Equiv.Set.ofEq <| congr_arg _ h
linear := .ofEq _ _ <| congr_arg _ h
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofEq_apply (h : S₁ = S₂) (x : S₁) : (ofEq S₁ S₂ h x : P₁) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofEq_symm (h : S₁ = S₂) : (ofEq S₁ S₂ h).symm = ofEq S₂ S₁ h.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofEq_rfl : ofEq S₁ S₁ rfl = AffineEquiv.refl k S₁ := rfl
end ofEq
theorem span_eq_top_iff {s : Set P₁} (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) :
affineSpan k s = ⊤ ↔ affineSpan k (e '' s) = ⊤ := by
refine ⟨(e : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂).span_eq_top_of_surjective e.surjective, ?_⟩
intro h
have : s = e.symm '' (e '' s) := by rw [← image_comp]; simp
rw [this]
exact (e.symm : P₂ →ᵃ[k] P₁).span_eq_top_of_surjective e.symm.surjective h
#align affine_equiv.span_eq_top_iff AffineEquiv.span_eq_top_iff
end AffineEquiv
end
namespace AffineSubspace
/-- The preimage of an affine subspace under an affine map as an affine subspace. -/
def comap (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : AffineSubspace k P₂) : AffineSubspace k P₁ where
carrier := f ⁻¹' s
smul_vsub_vadd_mem t p₁ p₂ p₃ (hp₁ : f p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : f p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : f p₃ ∈ s) :=
show f _ ∈ s by
rw [AffineMap.map_vadd, LinearMap.map_smul, AffineMap.linearMap_vsub]
apply s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ hp₁ hp₂ hp₃
#align affine_subspace.comap AffineSubspace.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : AffineSubspace k P₂) : (s.comap f : Set P₁) = f ⁻¹' ↑s :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_comap AffineSubspace.coe_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂} {x : P₁} {s : AffineSubspace k P₂} : x ∈ s.comap f ↔ f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.mem_comap AffineSubspace.mem_comap
theorem comap_mono {f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂} {s t : AffineSubspace k P₂} : s ≤ t → s.comap f ≤ t.comap f :=
preimage_mono
#align affine_subspace.comap_mono AffineSubspace.comap_mono
@[simp]
theorem comap_top {f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂} : (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P₂).comap f = ⊤ := by
rw [← ext_iff]
exact preimage_univ (f := f)
#align affine_subspace.comap_top AffineSubspace.comap_top
@[simp] theorem comap_bot (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) : comap f ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_id (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) : s.comap (AffineMap.id k P₁) = s :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.comap_id AffineSubspace.comap_id
theorem comap_comap (s : AffineSubspace k P₃) (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (g : P₂ →ᵃ[k] P₃) :
(s.comap g).comap f = s.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.comap_comap AffineSubspace.comap_comap
-- lemmas about map and comap derived from the galois connection
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂} {s : AffineSubspace k P₁} {t : AffineSubspace k P₂} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
image_subset_iff
#align affine_subspace.map_le_iff_le_comap AffineSubspace.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align affine_subspace.gc_map_comap AffineSubspace.gc_map_comap
theorem map_comap_le (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : AffineSubspace k P₂) : (s.comap f).map f ≤ s :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align affine_subspace.map_comap_le AffineSubspace.map_comap_le
theorem le_comap_map (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) : s ≤ (s.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align affine_subspace.le_comap_map AffineSubspace.le_comap_map
theorem map_sup (s t : AffineSubspace k P₁) (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) : (s ⊔ t).map f = s.map f ⊔ t.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
#align affine_subspace.map_sup AffineSubspace.map_sup
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : ι → AffineSubspace k P₁) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
#align affine_subspace.map_supr AffineSubspace.map_iSup
theorem comap_inf (s t : AffineSubspace k P₂) (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) :
(s ⊓ t).comap f = s.comap f ⊓ t.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
#align affine_subspace.comap_inf AffineSubspace.comap_inf
theorem comap_supr {ι : Sort*} (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : ι → AffineSubspace k P₂) :
(iInf s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_iInf
#align affine_subspace.comap_supr AffineSubspace.comap_supr
@[simp]
theorem comap_symm (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) :
s.comap (e.symm : P₂ →ᵃ[k] P₁) = s.map e :=
coe_injective <| e.preimage_symm _
#align affine_subspace.comap_symm AffineSubspace.comap_symm
@[simp]
theorem map_symm (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : AffineSubspace k P₂) :
s.map (e.symm : P₂ →ᵃ[k] P₁) = s.comap e :=
coe_injective <| e.image_symm _
#align affine_subspace.map_symm AffineSubspace.map_symm
theorem comap_span (f : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (s : Set P₂) :
(affineSpan k s).comap (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) = affineSpan k (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← map_symm, map_span, AffineEquiv.coe_coe, f.image_symm]
#align affine_subspace.comap_span AffineSubspace.comap_span
end AffineSubspace
end MapComap
namespace AffineSubspace
open AffineEquiv
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P]
/-- Two affine subspaces are parallel if one is related to the other by adding the same vector
to all points. -/
def Parallel (s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P) : Prop :=
∃ v : V, s₂ = s₁.map (constVAdd k P v)
#align affine_subspace.parallel AffineSubspace.Parallel
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Affine] infixl:50 " ∥ " => AffineSubspace.Parallel
@[symm]
theorem Parallel.symm {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s₁ ∥ s₂) : s₂ ∥ s₁ := by
rcases h with ⟨v, rfl⟩
refine ⟨-v, ?_⟩
rw [map_map, ← coe_trans_to_affineMap, ← constVAdd_add, neg_add_self, constVAdd_zero,
coe_refl_to_affineMap, map_id]
#align affine_subspace.parallel.symm AffineSubspace.Parallel.symm
theorem parallel_comm {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} : s₁ ∥ s₂ ↔ s₂ ∥ s₁ :=
⟨Parallel.symm, Parallel.symm⟩
#align affine_subspace.parallel_comm AffineSubspace.parallel_comm
@[refl]
theorem Parallel.refl (s : AffineSubspace k P) : s ∥ s :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
#align affine_subspace.parallel.refl AffineSubspace.Parallel.refl
@[trans]
theorem Parallel.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : AffineSubspace k P} (h₁₂ : s₁ ∥ s₂) (h₂₃ : s₂ ∥ s₃) :
s₁ ∥ s₃ := by
rcases h₁₂ with ⟨v₁₂, rfl⟩
rcases h₂₃ with ⟨v₂₃, rfl⟩
refine ⟨v₂₃ + v₁₂, ?_⟩
rw [map_map, ← coe_trans_to_affineMap, ← constVAdd_add]
#align affine_subspace.parallel.trans AffineSubspace.Parallel.trans
theorem Parallel.direction_eq {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s₁ ∥ s₂) :
s₁.direction = s₂.direction := by
rcases h with ⟨v, rfl⟩
simp
#align affine_subspace.parallel.direction_eq AffineSubspace.Parallel.direction_eq
@[simp]
theorem parallel_bot_iff_eq_bot {s : AffineSubspace k P} : s ∥ ⊥ ↔ s = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h ▸ Parallel.refl _⟩
rcases h with ⟨v, h⟩
rwa [eq_comm, map_eq_bot_iff] at h
#align affine_subspace.parallel_bot_iff_eq_bot AffineSubspace.parallel_bot_iff_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_parallel_iff_eq_bot {s : AffineSubspace k P} : ⊥ ∥ s ↔ s = ⊥ := by
rw [parallel_comm, parallel_bot_iff_eq_bot]
#align affine_subspace.bot_parallel_iff_eq_bot AffineSubspace.bot_parallel_iff_eq_bot
theorem parallel_iff_direction_eq_and_eq_bot_iff_eq_bot {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} :
s₁ ∥ s₂ ↔ s₁.direction = s₂.direction ∧ (s₁ = ⊥ ↔ s₂ = ⊥) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.direction_eq, ?_, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact bot_parallel_iff_eq_bot.1 h
· rintro rfl
exact parallel_bot_iff_eq_bot.1 h
· rcases h with ⟨hd, hb⟩
by_cases hs₁ : s₁ = ⊥
· rw [hs₁, bot_parallel_iff_eq_bot]
exact hb.1 hs₁
· have hs₂ : s₂ ≠ ⊥ := hb.not.1 hs₁
rcases (nonempty_iff_ne_bot s₁).2 hs₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩
rcases (nonempty_iff_ne_bot s₂).2 hs₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂⟩
refine ⟨p₂ -ᵥ p₁, (eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem hp₂ ?_).2 ?_⟩
· rw [mem_map]
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
simp
· simpa using hd.symm
#align affine_subspace.parallel_iff_direction_eq_and_eq_bot_iff_eq_bot AffineSubspace.parallel_iff_direction_eq_and_eq_bot_iff_eq_bot
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/AffineSubspace.lean | 1,872 | 1,875 | theorem Parallel.vectorSpan_eq {s₁ s₂ : Set P} (h : affineSpan k s₁ ∥ affineSpan k s₂) :
vectorSpan k s₁ = vectorSpan k s₂ := by |
simp_rw [← direction_affineSpan]
exact h.direction_eq
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Henry Swanson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Henry Swanson
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Option
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Option
#align_import combinatorics.derangements.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9407b03373c8cd201df99d6bc5514fc2db44054f"
/-!
# Derangements on types
In this file we define `derangements α`, the set of derangements on a type `α`.
We also define some equivalences involving various subtypes of `Perm α` and `derangements α`:
* `derangementsOptionEquivSigmaAtMostOneFixedPoint`: An equivalence between
`derangements (Option α)` and the sigma-type `Σ a : α, {f : Perm α // fixed_points f ⊆ a}`.
* `derangementsRecursionEquiv`: An equivalence between `derangements (Option α)` and the
sigma-type `Σ a : α, (derangements (({a}ᶜ : Set α) : Type*) ⊕ derangements α)` which is later
used to inductively count the number of derangements.
In order to prove the above, we also prove some results about the effect of `Equiv.removeNone`
on derangements: `RemoveNone.fiber_none` and `RemoveNone.fiber_some`.
-/
open Equiv Function
/-- A permutation is a derangement if it has no fixed points. -/
def derangements (α : Type*) : Set (Perm α) :=
{ f : Perm α | ∀ x : α, f x ≠ x }
#align derangements derangements
variable {α β : Type*}
theorem mem_derangements_iff_fixedPoints_eq_empty {f : Perm α} :
f ∈ derangements α ↔ fixedPoints f = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.symm
#align mem_derangements_iff_fixed_points_eq_empty mem_derangements_iff_fixedPoints_eq_empty
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `derangements α` is equivalent to `derangements β`. -/
def Equiv.derangementsCongr (e : α ≃ β) : derangements α ≃ derangements β :=
e.permCongr.subtypeEquiv fun {f} => e.forall_congr <| by
intro b; simp only [ne_eq, permCongr_apply, symm_apply_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
#align equiv.derangements_congr Equiv.derangementsCongr
namespace derangements
/-- Derangements on a subtype are equivalent to permutations on the original type where points are
fixed iff they are not in the subtype. -/
protected def subtypeEquiv (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
derangements (Subtype p) ≃ { f : Perm α // ∀ a, ¬p a ↔ a ∈ fixedPoints f } :=
calc
derangements (Subtype p) ≃ { f : { f : Perm α // ∀ a, ¬p a → a ∈ fixedPoints f } //
∀ a, a ∈ fixedPoints f → ¬p a } := by
refine (Perm.subtypeEquivSubtypePerm p).subtypeEquiv fun f => ⟨fun hf a hfa ha => ?_, ?_⟩
· refine hf ⟨a, ha⟩ (Subtype.ext ?_)
simp_rw [mem_fixedPoints, IsFixedPt, Perm.subtypeEquivSubtypePerm,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Perm.ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _ ha] at hfa
assumption
rintro hf ⟨a, ha⟩ hfa
refine hf _ ?_ ha
simp only [Perm.subtypeEquivSubtypePerm_apply_coe, mem_fixedPoints]
dsimp [IsFixedPt]
simp_rw [Perm.ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _ ha, hfa]
_ ≃ { f : Perm α // ∃ _h : ∀ a, ¬p a → a ∈ fixedPoints f, ∀ a, a ∈ fixedPoints f → ¬p a } :=
subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists _ _
_ ≃ { f : Perm α // ∀ a, ¬p a ↔ a ∈ fixedPoints f } :=
subtypeEquivRight fun f => by
simp_rw [exists_prop, ← forall_and, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
#align derangements.subtype_equiv derangements.subtypeEquiv
universe u
/-- The set of permutations that fix either `a` or nothing is equivalent to the sum of:
- derangements on `α`
- derangements on `α` minus `a`. -/
def atMostOneFixedPointEquivSum_derangements [DecidableEq α] (a : α) :
{ f : Perm α // fixedPoints f ⊆ {a} } ≃ Sum (derangements ({a}ᶜ : Set α)) (derangements α) :=
calc
{ f : Perm α // fixedPoints f ⊆ {a} } ≃
Sum { f : { f : Perm α // fixedPoints f ⊆ {a} } // a ∈ fixedPoints f }
{ f : { f : Perm α // fixedPoints f ⊆ {a} } // a ∉ fixedPoints f } :=
(Equiv.sumCompl _).symm
_ ≃ Sum { f : Perm α // fixedPoints f ⊆ {a} ∧ a ∈ fixedPoints f }
{ f : Perm α // fixedPoints f ⊆ {a} ∧ a ∉ fixedPoints f } := by
-- Porting note: `subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter` no longer works with placeholder `_`s.
refine Equiv.sumCongr ?_ ?_
· exact subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter
(fun x : Perm α => fixedPoints x ⊆ {a})
(a ∈ fixedPoints ·)
· exact subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter
(fun x : Perm α => fixedPoints x ⊆ {a})
(¬a ∈ fixedPoints ·)
_ ≃ Sum { f : Perm α // fixedPoints f = {a} } { f : Perm α // fixedPoints f = ∅ } := by
refine Equiv.sumCongr (subtypeEquivRight fun f => ?_) (subtypeEquivRight fun f => ?_)
· rw [Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, and_comm]
rfl
· rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun h x hx => h.2 (h.1 hx ▸ hx), fun h => ⟨fun x hx => (h _ hx).elim, h _⟩⟩
_ ≃ Sum (derangements ({a}ᶜ : Set α)) (derangements α) := by
-- Porting note: was `subtypeEquiv _` but now needs the placeholder to be provided explicitly
refine
Equiv.sumCongr ((derangements.subtypeEquiv (· ∈ ({a}ᶜ : Set α))).trans <|
subtypeEquivRight fun x => ?_).symm
(subtypeEquivRight fun f => mem_derangements_iff_fixedPoints_eq_empty.symm)
rw [eq_comm, Set.ext_iff]
simp_rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, Classical.not_not]
#align derangements.at_most_one_fixed_point_equiv_sum_derangements derangements.atMostOneFixedPointEquivSum_derangements
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The set of permutations `f` such that the preimage of `(a, f)` under
`Equiv.Perm.decomposeOption` is a derangement. -/
def RemoveNone.fiber (a : Option α) : Set (Perm α) :=
{ f : Perm α | (a, f) ∈ Equiv.Perm.decomposeOption '' derangements (Option α) }
#align derangements.equiv.remove_none.fiber derangements.Equiv.RemoveNone.fiber
theorem RemoveNone.mem_fiber (a : Option α) (f : Perm α) :
f ∈ RemoveNone.fiber a ↔
∃ F : Perm (Option α), F ∈ derangements (Option α) ∧ F none = a ∧ removeNone F = f := by
simp [RemoveNone.fiber, derangements]
#align derangements.equiv.remove_none.mem_fiber derangements.Equiv.RemoveNone.mem_fiber
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Derangements/Basic.lean | 129 | 134 | theorem RemoveNone.fiber_none : RemoveNone.fiber (@none α) = ∅ := by |
rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
intro f hyp
rw [RemoveNone.mem_fiber] at hyp
rcases hyp with ⟨F, F_derangement, F_none, _⟩
exact F_derangement none F_none
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Inversion.Basic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.PerpBisector
/-!
# Image of a hyperplane under inversion
In this file we prove that the inversion with center `c` and radius `R ≠ 0` maps a sphere passing
through the center to a hyperplane, and vice versa. More precisely, it maps a sphere with center
`y ≠ c` and radius `dist y c` to the hyperplane
`AffineSubspace.perpBisector c (EuclideanGeometry.inversion c R y)`.
The exact statements are a little more complicated because `EuclideanGeometry.inversion c R` sends
the center to itself, not to a point at infinity.
We also prove that the inversion sends an affine subspace passing through the center to itself.
## Keywords
inversion
-/
open Metric Function AffineMap Set AffineSubspace
open scoped Topology
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {c x y : P} {R : ℝ}
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-- The inversion with center `c` and radius `R` maps a sphere passing through the center to a
hyperplane. -/
theorem inversion_mem_perpBisector_inversion_iff (hR : R ≠ 0) (hx : x ≠ c) (hy : y ≠ c) :
inversion c R x ∈ perpBisector c (inversion c R y) ↔ dist x y = dist y c := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq, dist_inversion_inversion hx hy, dist_inversion_center]
have hx' := dist_ne_zero.2 hx
have hy' := dist_ne_zero.2 hy
field_simp [mul_assoc, mul_comm, hx, hx.symm, eq_comm]
/-- The inversion with center `c` and radius `R` maps a sphere passing through the center to a
hyperplane. -/
theorem inversion_mem_perpBisector_inversion_iff' (hR : R ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ c) :
inversion c R x ∈ perpBisector c (inversion c R y) ↔ dist x y = dist y c ∧ x ≠ c := by
rcases eq_or_ne x c with rfl | hx
· simp [*]
· simp [inversion_mem_perpBisector_inversion_iff hR hx hy, hx]
theorem preimage_inversion_perpBisector_inversion (hR : R ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ c) :
inversion c R ⁻¹' perpBisector c (inversion c R y) = sphere y (dist y c) \ {c} :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ inversion_mem_perpBisector_inversion_iff' hR hy
theorem preimage_inversion_perpBisector (hR : R ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ c) :
inversion c R ⁻¹' perpBisector c y = sphere (inversion c R y) (R ^ 2 / dist y c) \ {c} := by
rw [← dist_inversion_center, ← preimage_inversion_perpBisector_inversion hR,
inversion_inversion] <;> simp [*]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Inversion/ImageHyperplane.lean | 61 | 64 | theorem image_inversion_perpBisector (hR : R ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ c) :
inversion c R '' perpBisector c y = sphere (inversion c R y) (R ^ 2 / dist y c) \ {c} := by |
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (inversion_involutive _ hR) (inversion_involutive _ hR),
preimage_inversion_perpBisector hR hy]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, François Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Extr
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
#align_import analysis.convex.function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
/-!
# Convex and concave functions
This file defines convex and concave functions in vector spaces and proves the finite Jensen
inequality. The integral version can be found in `Analysis.Convex.Integral`.
A function `f : E → β` is `ConvexOn` a set `s` if `s` is itself a convex set, and for any two
points `x y ∈ s`, the segment joining `(x, f x)` to `(y, f y)` is above the graph of `f`.
Equivalently, `ConvexOn 𝕜 f s` means that the epigraph `{p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2}` is
a convex set.
## Main declarations
* `ConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
-/
open scoped Classical
open LinearMap Set Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F α β ι : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [OrderedAddCommMonoid α] [OrderedAddCommMonoid β]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 α] [SMul 𝕜 β] (s : Set E) (f : E → β) {g : β → α}
/-- Convexity of functions -/
def ConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y
#align convex_on ConvexOn
/-- Concavity of functions -/
def ConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
#align concave_on ConcaveOn
/-- Strict convexity of functions -/
def StrictConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y
#align strict_convex_on StrictConvexOn
/-- Strict concavity of functions -/
def StrictConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)
#align strict_concave_on StrictConcaveOn
variable {𝕜 s f}
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
theorem ConvexOn.dual (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
#align convex_on.dual ConvexOn.dual
theorem ConcaveOn.dual (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
#align concave_on.dual ConcaveOn.dual
theorem StrictConvexOn.dual (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
#align strict_convex_on.dual StrictConvexOn.dual
theorem StrictConcaveOn.dual (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
#align strict_concave_on.dual StrictConcaveOn.dual
theorem convexOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
#align convex_on_id convexOn_id
theorem concaveOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
#align concave_on_id concaveOn_id
theorem ConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
#align convex_on.subset ConvexOn.subset
theorem ConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
#align concave_on.subset ConcaveOn.subset
theorem StrictConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
#align strict_convex_on.subset StrictConvexOn.subset
theorem StrictConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
#align strict_concave_on.subset StrictConcaveOn.subset
theorem ConvexOn.comp (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab⟩
#align convex_on.comp ConvexOn.comp
theorem ConcaveOn.comp (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
#align concave_on.comp ConcaveOn.comp
theorem ConvexOn.comp_concaveOn (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
#align convex_on.comp_concave_on ConvexOn.comp_concaveOn
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_convexOn (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
#align concave_on.comp_convex_on ConcaveOn.comp_convexOn
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab⟩
#align strict_convex_on.comp StrictConvexOn.comp
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
#align strict_concave_on.comp StrictConcaveOn.comp
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp_strictConcaveOn (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
#align strict_convex_on.comp_strict_concave_on StrictConvexOn.comp_strictConcaveOn
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp_strictConvexOn (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
#align strict_concave_on.comp_strict_convex_on StrictConcaveOn.comp_strictConvexOn
end SMul
section DistribMulAction
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.add (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]
⟩
#align convex_on.add ConvexOn.add
theorem ConcaveOn.add (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
#align concave_on.add ConcaveOn.add
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem convexOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun _ : E => c :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hab => (Convex.combo_self hab c).ge⟩
#align convex_on_const convexOn_const
theorem concaveOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun _ => c :=
convexOn_const (β := βᵒᵈ) _ hs
#align concave_on_const concaveOn_const
theorem convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 }) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).1,
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).2⟩
#align convex_on_of_convex_epigraph convexOn_of_convex_epigraph
theorem concaveOn_of_convex_hypograph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 }) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ) h
#align concave_on_of_convex_hypograph concaveOn_of_convex_hypograph
end Module
section OrderedSMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ r }) :=
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2
· exact hy.2
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
#align convex_on.convex_le ConvexOn.convex_le
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_ge (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r ≤ f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_le r
#align concave_on.convex_ge ConcaveOn.convex_ge
theorem ConvexOn.convex_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } := by
rintro ⟨x, r⟩ ⟨hx, hr⟩ ⟨y, t⟩ ⟨hy, ht⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine ⟨hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • t := by gcongr
#align convex_on.convex_epigraph ConvexOn.convex_epigraph
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_epigraph
#align concave_on.convex_hypograph ConcaveOn.convex_hypograph
theorem convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
⟨ConvexOn.convex_epigraph, convexOn_of_convex_epigraph⟩
#align convex_on_iff_convex_epigraph convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph
theorem concaveOn_iff_convex_hypograph :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ)
#align concave_on_iff_convex_hypograph concaveOn_iff_convex_hypograph
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_right (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ ≤ a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
⟩
#align convex_on.translate_right ConvexOn.translate_right
/-- Right translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
#align concave_on.translate_right ConcaveOn.translate_right
/-- Left translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_left (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm c] using hf.translate_right c
#align convex_on.translate_left ConvexOn.translate_left
/-- Left translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) :=
hf.dual.translate_left _
#align concave_on.translate_left ConcaveOn.translate_left
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
theorem convexOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
refine and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha.le hb.le hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
subst b
simp_rw [zero_smul, zero_add, one_smul, le_rfl]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
subst a
simp_rw [zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, le_rfl]
exact h hx hy ha' hb' hab
#align convex_on_iff_forall_pos convexOn_iff_forall_pos
theorem concaveOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_forall_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
#align concave_on_iff_forall_pos concaveOn_iff_forall_pos
theorem convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
rw [convexOn_iff_forall_pos]
refine
and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha hb hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rw [Convex.combo_self hab, Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
#align convex_on_iff_pairwise_pos convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos
theorem concaveOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
#align concave_on_iff_pairwise_pos concaveOn_iff_pairwise_pos
/-- A linear map is convex. -/
theorem LinearMap.convexOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
#align linear_map.convex_on LinearMap.convexOn
/-- A linear map is concave. -/
theorem LinearMap.concaveOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
#align linear_map.concave_on LinearMap.concaveOn
theorem StrictConvexOn.convexOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab => (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).le⟩
#align strict_convex_on.convex_on StrictConvexOn.convexOn
theorem StrictConcaveOn.concaveOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
hf.dual.convexOn
#align strict_concave_on.concave_on StrictConcaveOn.concaveOn
section OrderedSMul
variable [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2.le
· exact hy.2.le
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
#align strict_convex_on.convex_lt StrictConvexOn.convex_lt
theorem StrictConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
#align strict_concave_on.convex_gt StrictConcaveOn.convex_gt
end OrderedSMul
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder E] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is convex, it suffices to
verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y` only for `x < y` and positive `a`,
`b`. The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order.
-/
theorem LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.2 ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
-- Porting note: without clearing the stray variables, `wlog` gives a bad term.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/wlog.20.2316495
clear! α F ι
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
#align linear_order.convex_on_of_lt LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is concave it suffices to
verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`. The
main use case is `E = ℝ` however one can apply it, e.g., to `ℝ^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.concaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
#align linear_order.concave_on_of_lt LinearOrder.concaveOn_of_lt
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly convex, it suffices
to verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
-- Porting note: without clearing the stray variables, `wlog` gives a bad term.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/wlog.20.2316495
clear! α F ι
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
#align linear_order.strict_convex_on_of_lt LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly concave it suffices
to verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConcaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
#align linear_order.strict_concave_on_of_lt LinearOrder.strictConcaveOn_of_lt
end LinearOrder
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [SMul 𝕜 β]
/-- If `g` is convex on `s`, so is `(f ∘ g)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConvexOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
⟨hf.1.linear_preimage _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (g (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • g x + b • g y) := by rw [g.map_add, g.map_smul, g.map_smul]
_ ≤ a • f (g x) + b • f (g y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
#align convex_on.comp_linear_map ConvexOn.comp_linearMap
/-- If `g` is concave on `s`, so is `(g ∘ f)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
hf.dual.comp_linearMap g
#align concave_on.comp_linear_map ConcaveOn.comp_linearMap
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid β]
section DistribMulAction
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_convexOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
#align strict_convex_on.add_convex_on StrictConvexOn.add_convexOn
theorem ConvexOn.add_strictConvexOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
add_comm g f ▸ hg.add_convexOn hf
#align convex_on.add_strict_convex_on ConvexOn.add_strictConvexOn
theorem StrictConvexOn.add (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
#align strict_convex_on.add StrictConvexOn.add
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_concaveOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_convexOn hg.dual
#align strict_concave_on.add_concave_on StrictConcaveOn.add_concaveOn
theorem ConcaveOn.add_strictConcaveOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_strictConvexOn hg.dual
#align concave_on.add_strict_concave_on ConcaveOn.add_strictConcaveOn
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
#align strict_concave_on.add StrictConcaveOn.add
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_forall_pos.2 fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • r + b • r :=
(add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hx.2 ha)
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hy.2.le hb.le))
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab _⟩
#align convex_on.convex_lt ConvexOn.convex_lt
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
#align concave_on.convex_gt ConcaveOn.convex_gt
theorem ConvexOn.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ f q.1 ≤ q.2) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } := by
rintro _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
refine ⟨hf.1 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • p.1 + b • q.1) ≤ a • f p.1 + b • f q.1 := hf.2 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • p.2 + b • q.2 := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hp.2 ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hq.2 hb.le)
#align convex_on.open_segment_subset_strict_epigraph ConvexOn.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph
theorem ConcaveOn.openSegment_subset_strict_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ q.2 ≤ f q.1) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp hq
#align concave_on.open_segment_subset_strict_hypograph ConcaveOn.openSegment_subset_strict_hypograph
theorem ConvexOn.convex_strict_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } :=
convex_iff_openSegment_subset.mpr fun p hp q hq =>
hf.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp ⟨hq.1, hq.2.le⟩
#align convex_on.convex_strict_epigraph ConvexOn.convex_strict_epigraph
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_strict_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_strict_epigraph
#align concave_on.convex_strict_hypograph ConcaveOn.convex_strict_hypograph
end Module
end OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E}
{f g : E → β}
/-- The pointwise maximum of convex functions is convex. -/
theorem ConvexOn.sup (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) := by
refine ⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => sup_le ?_ ?_⟩
· calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.right hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_left
· calc
g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • g x + b • g y := hg.right hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_right
#align convex_on.sup ConvexOn.sup
/-- The pointwise minimum of concave functions is concave. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.inf (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
#align concave_on.inf ConcaveOn.inf
/-- The pointwise maximum of strictly convex functions is strictly convex. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.sup (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
max_lt
(calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_left)
(calc
g (a • x + b • y) < a • g x + b • g y := hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_right)⟩
#align strict_convex_on.sup StrictConvexOn.sup
/-- The pointwise minimum of strictly concave functions is strictly concave. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.inf (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
#align strict_concave_on.inf StrictConcaveOn.inf
/-- A convex function on a segment is upper-bounded by the max of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConvexOn.le_on_segment' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) {a b : 𝕜}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • max (f x) (f y) + b • max (f x) (f y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = max (f x) (f y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
#align convex_on.le_on_segment' ConvexOn.le_on_segment'
/-- A concave function on a segment is lower-bounded by the min of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_on_segment' hx hy ha hb hab
#align concave_on.ge_on_segment' ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment'
/-- A convex function on a segment is upper-bounded by the max of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConvexOn.le_on_segment (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : f z ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, _, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ := hz
hz ▸ hf.le_on_segment' hx hy ha hb hab
#align convex_on.le_on_segment ConvexOn.le_on_segment
/-- A concave function on a segment is lower-bounded by the min of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_on_segment hx hy hz
#align concave_on.ge_on_segment ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment
/-- A strictly convex function on an open segment is strictly upper-bounded by the max of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.lt_on_open_segment' (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
f (a • x + b • y) < max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • max (f x) (f y) + b • max (f x) (f y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = max (f x) (f y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
#align strict_convex_on.lt_on_open_segment' StrictConvexOn.lt_on_open_segment'
/-- A strictly concave function on an open segment is strictly lower-bounded by the min of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_open_segment' (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
min (f x) (f y) < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_on_open_segment' hx hy hxy ha hb hab
#align strict_concave_on.lt_on_open_segment' StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_open_segment'
/-- A strictly convex function on an open segment is strictly upper-bounded by the max of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.lt_on_openSegment (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) : f z < max (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, _, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ := hz
hz ▸ hf.lt_on_open_segment' hx hy hxy ha hb hab
#align strict_convex_on.lt_on_open_segment StrictConvexOn.lt_on_openSegment
/-- A strictly concave function on an open segment is strictly lower-bounded by the min of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_openSegment (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) : min (f x) (f y) < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_on_openSegment hx hy hxy hz
#align strict_concave_on.lt_on_open_segment StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_openSegment
end LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid β]
section OrderedSMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f x :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl (f (a • x + b • y)) <|
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb hab
_ < a • f (a • x + b • y) + b • f (a • x + b • y) := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left h ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hfy hb)
_ = f (a • x + b • y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
#align convex_on.le_left_of_right_le' ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le'
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f y) :
f x ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le' hx hy ha hb hab hfy
#align concave_on.left_le_of_le_right' ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right'
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f x ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f y := by
rw [add_comm] at hab hfx ⊢
exact hf.le_left_of_right_le' hy hx hb ha hab hfx
#align convex_on.le_right_of_left_le' ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le'
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f x) :
f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le' hx hy ha hb hab hfx
#align concave_on.right_le_of_le_left' ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left'
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f y ≤ f z) : f z ≤ f x := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.le_left_of_right_le' hx hy ha hb.le hab hyz
#align convex_on.le_left_of_right_le ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f z ≤ f y) : f x ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le hx hy hz hyz
#align concave_on.left_le_of_le_right ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f x ≤ f z) : f z ≤ f y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.le_right_of_left_le' hx hy ha.le hb hab hxz
#align convex_on.le_right_of_left_le ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f z ≤ f x) : f y ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le hx hy hz hxz
#align concave_on.right_le_of_le_left ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
/- The following lemmas don't require `Module 𝕜 E` if you add the hypothesis `x ≠ y`. At the time of
the writing, we decided the resulting lemmas wouldn't be useful. Feel free to reintroduce them. -/
theorem ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) < f x :=
not_le.1 fun h ↦ lt_irrefl (f (a • x + b • y)) <|
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • f (a • x + b • y) + b • f (a • x + b • y) := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h ha.le) (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hfy hb)
_ = f (a • x + b • y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
#align convex_on.lt_left_of_right_lt' ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt'
theorem ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f (a • x + b • y) < f y) :
f x < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_left_of_right_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hfy
#align concave_on.left_lt_of_lt_right' ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right'
theorem ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f x < f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) < f y := by
rw [add_comm] at hab hfx ⊢
exact hf.lt_left_of_right_lt' hy hx hb ha hab hfx
#align convex_on.lt_right_of_left_lt' ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt'
theorem ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f (a • x + b • y) < f x) :
f y < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_right_of_left_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hfx
#align concave_on.lt_right_of_left_lt' ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt'
theorem ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f y < f z) : f z < f x := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.lt_left_of_right_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hyz
#align convex_on.lt_left_of_right_lt ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt
theorem ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f z < f y) : f x < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_left_of_right_lt hx hy hz hyz
#align concave_on.left_lt_of_lt_right ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right
theorem ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f x < f z) : f z < f y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.lt_right_of_left_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hxz
#align convex_on.lt_right_of_left_lt ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt
theorem ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f z < f x) : f y < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_right_of_left_lt hx hy hz hxz
#align concave_on.lt_right_of_left_lt ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt
end Module
end LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
/-- A function `-f` is convex iff `f` is concave. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_convexOn_iff : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
simp? [neg_apply, neg_le, add_comm] at h says
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, le_add_neg_iff_add_le, add_comm,
add_neg_le_iff_le_add] at h
exact h hx hy ha hb hab
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff]
simp_rw [neg_add, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, neg_neg]
exact h hx hy ha hb hab
#align neg_convex_on_iff neg_convexOn_iff
/-- A function `-f` is concave iff `f` is convex. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_concaveOn_iff : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
rw [← neg_convexOn_iff, neg_neg f]
#align neg_concave_on_iff neg_concaveOn_iff
/-- A function `-f` is strictly convex iff `f` is strictly concave. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_strictConvexOn_iff : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
simp only [ne_eq, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt, add_comm,
add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add] at h
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff]
simp_rw [neg_add, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, neg_neg]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
#align neg_strict_convex_on_iff neg_strictConvexOn_iff
/-- A function `-f` is strictly concave iff `f` is strictly convex. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_strictConcaveOn_iff : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
rw [← neg_strictConvexOn_iff, neg_neg f]
#align neg_strict_concave_on_iff neg_strictConcaveOn_iff
alias ⟨_, ConcaveOn.neg⟩ := neg_convexOn_iff
#align concave_on.neg ConcaveOn.neg
alias ⟨_, ConvexOn.neg⟩ := neg_concaveOn_iff
#align convex_on.neg ConvexOn.neg
alias ⟨_, StrictConcaveOn.neg⟩ := neg_strictConvexOn_iff
#align strict_concave_on.neg StrictConcaveOn.neg
alias ⟨_, StrictConvexOn.neg⟩ := neg_strictConcaveOn_iff
#align strict_convex_on.neg StrictConvexOn.neg
theorem ConvexOn.sub (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
#align convex_on.sub ConvexOn.sub
theorem ConcaveOn.sub (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
#align concave_on.sub ConcaveOn.sub
theorem StrictConvexOn.sub (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
#align strict_convex_on.sub StrictConvexOn.sub
theorem StrictConcaveOn.sub (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
#align strict_concave_on.sub StrictConcaveOn.sub
theorem ConvexOn.sub_strictConcaveOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_strictConvexOn hg.neg
#align convex_on.sub_strict_concave_on ConvexOn.sub_strictConcaveOn
theorem ConcaveOn.sub_strictConvexOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_strictConcaveOn hg.neg
#align concave_on.sub_strict_convex_on ConcaveOn.sub_strictConvexOn
theorem StrictConvexOn.sub_concaveOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_convexOn hg.neg
#align strict_convex_on.sub_concave_on StrictConvexOn.sub_concaveOn
theorem StrictConcaveOn.sub_convexOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_concaveOn hg.neg
#align strict_concave_on.sub_convex_on StrictConcaveOn.sub_convexOn
end OrderedAddCommGroup
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCancelCommMonoid
variable [AddCancelCommMonoid E] [OrderedAddCommMonoid β] [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E}
{f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves strict convexity. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.translate_right (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ < a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ((add_right_injective c).ne hxy) ha hb hab⟩
#align strict_convex_on.translate_right StrictConvexOn.translate_right
/-- Right translation preserves strict concavity. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
#align strict_concave_on.translate_right StrictConcaveOn.translate_right
/-- Left translation preserves strict convexity. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Function.lean | 956 | 958 | theorem StrictConvexOn.translate_left (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by |
simpa only [add_comm] using hf.translate_right c
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
#align_import data.set.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file defines the product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i` along with the diagonal of a
type.
## Main declarations
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun _ => And.decidable
#align set.decidable_mem_prod Set.decidableMemProd
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
#align set.prod_mono Set.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
#align set.prod_mono_left Set.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
#align set.prod_mono_right Set.prod_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
#align set.prod_self_subset_prod_self Set.prod_self_subset_prod_self
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
#align set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self Set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
#align set.prod_subset_iff Set.prod_subset_iff
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
#align set.forall_prod_set Set.forall_prod_set
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
#align set.exists_prod_set Set.exists_prod_set
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact and_false_iff _
#align set.prod_empty Set.prod_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_prod Set.empty_prod
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact true_and_iff _
#align set.univ_prod_univ Set.univ_prod_univ
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.univ_prod Set.univ_prod
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.prod_univ Set.prod_univ
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.singleton_prod Set.singleton_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.prod_singleton Set.prod_singleton
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by simp
#align set.singleton_prod_singleton Set.singleton_prod_singleton
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
#align set.union_prod Set.union_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
#align set.prod_union Set.prod_union
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.inter_prod Set.inter_prod
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.prod_inter Set.prod_inter
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align set.prod_inter_prod Set.prod_inter_prod
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
#align set.disjoint_prod Set.disjoint_prod
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_left Set.Disjoint.set_prod_left
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_right Set.Disjoint.set_prod_right
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp]
#align set.insert_prod Set.insert_prod
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
-- porting note (#10745):
-- was `simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp, Imp.swap]`
simp only [mem_prod, mem_insert_iff, image, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.injEq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hx, rfl|hy⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, hy⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩|⟨hx, hy⟩ := h
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inl rfl⟩
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inr hy⟩
#align set.prod_insert Set.prod_insert
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_eq Set.prod_preimage_eq
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_left Set.prod_preimage_left
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_right Set.prod_preimage_right
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_prod_map_prod Set.preimage_prod_map_prod
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.mk_preimage_prod Set.mk_preimage_prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left Set.mk_preimage_prod_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right Set.mk_preimage_prod_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
#align set.preimage_swap_prod Set.preimage_swap_prod
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
#align set.image_swap_prod Set.image_swap_prod
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
#align set.prod_image_image_eq Set.prod_image_image_eq
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_range_eq Set.prod_range_range_eq
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prod_map {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
#align set.range_prod_map Set.range_prod_map
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_univ_eq Set.prod_range_univ_eq
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_univ_range_eq Set.prod_univ_range_eq
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prod_map]
apply range_comp_subset_range
#align set.range_pair_subset Set.range_pair_subset
theorem Nonempty.prod : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty.prod Set.Nonempty.prod
theorem Nonempty.fst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.1, hx.1⟩
#align set.nonempty.fst Set.Nonempty.fst
theorem Nonempty.snd : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.2, hx.2⟩
#align set.nonempty.snd Set.Nonempty.snd
@[simp]
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
#align set.prod_nonempty_iff Set.prod_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
#align set.prod_eq_empty_iff Set.prod_eq_empty_iff
theorem prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : Set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s ×ˢ t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.prod_sub_preimage_iff Set.prod_sub_preimage_iff
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) '' s ⊆ (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mk_mem_prod (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem g hx)
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a '' t ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right
theorem prod_subset_preimage_fst (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
inter_subset_left
#align set.prod_subset_preimage_fst Set.prod_subset_preimage_fst
theorem fst_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_fst s t
#align set.fst_image_prod_subset Set.fst_image_prod_subset
theorem fst_image_prod (s : Set β) {t : Set α} (ht : t.Nonempty) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t = s :=
(fst_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht
⟨(y, x), ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.fst_image_prod Set.fst_image_prod
theorem prod_subset_preimage_snd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
inter_subset_right
#align set.prod_subset_preimage_snd Set.prod_subset_preimage_snd
theorem snd_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s t
#align set.snd_image_prod_subset Set.snd_image_prod_subset
theorem snd_image_prod {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t = t :=
(snd_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y y_in =>
let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := hs
⟨(x, y), ⟨x_in, y_in⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.snd_image_prod Set.snd_image_prod
theorem prod_diff_prod : s ×ˢ t \ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ = s ×ˢ (t \ t₁) ∪ (s \ s₁) ×ˢ t := by
ext x
by_cases h₁ : x.1 ∈ s₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : x.2 ∈ t₁ <;> simp [*]
#align set.prod_diff_prod Set.prod_diff_prod
/-- A product set is included in a product set if and only factors are included, or a factor of the
first set is empty. -/
theorem prod_subset_prod_iff : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁ ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by rwa [prod_nonempty_iff] at h
refine ⟨fun H => Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have := image_subset (Prod.fst : α × β → α) H
rwa [fst_image_prod _ st.2, fst_image_prod _ (h.mono H).snd] at this
· have := image_subset (Prod.snd : α × β → β) H
rwa [snd_image_prod st.1, snd_image_prod (h.mono H).fst] at this
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, or_false_iff] at H
exact prod_mono H.1 H.2
#align set.prod_subset_prod_iff Set.prod_subset_prod_iff
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ := by
constructor
· intro heq
have h₁ : (s₁ ×ˢ t₁ : Set _).Nonempty := by rwa [← heq]
rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at h h₁
rw [← fst_image_prod s h.2, ← fst_image_prod s₁ h₁.2, heq, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff, ←
snd_image_prod h.1 t, ← snd_image_prod h₁.1 t₁, heq]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty Set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ ∨ (s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (s₁ = ∅ ∨ t₁ = ∅) := by
symm
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (s ×ˢ t) with h | h
· simp_rw [h, @eq_comm _ ∅, prod_eq_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h, true_and_iff,
or_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h
rw [prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty h]
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, prod_eq_empty_iff] at h
simp_rw [h, false_and_iff, or_false_iff]
#align set.prod_eq_prod_iff Set.prod_eq_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_iff_eq (ht : t.Nonempty) : s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ↔ s = s₁ := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_iff, ht.ne_empty, and_true_iff, or_iff_left_iff_imp,
or_false_iff]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align set.prod_eq_iff_eq Set.prod_eq_iff_eq
section Mono
variable [Preorder α] {f : α → Set β} {g : α → Set γ}
theorem _root_.Monotone.set_prod (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
#align monotone.set_prod Monotone.set_prod
theorem _root_.Antitone.set_prod (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
#align antitone.set_prod Antitone.set_prod
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.set_prod (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
#align monotone_on.set_prod MonotoneOn.set_prod
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.set_prod (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
#align antitone_on.set_prod AntitoneOn.set_prod
end Mono
end Prod
/-! ### Diagonal
In this section we prove some lemmas about the diagonal set `{p | p.1 = p.2}` and the diagonal map
`fun x ↦ (x, x)`.
-/
section Diagonal
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α}
lemma diagonal_nonempty [Nonempty α] : (diagonal α).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun x => ⟨_, mem_diagonal x⟩
#align set.diagonal_nonempty Set.diagonal_nonempty
instance decidableMemDiagonal [h : DecidableEq α] (x : α × α) : Decidable (x ∈ diagonal α) :=
h x.1 x.2
#align set.decidable_mem_diagonal Set.decidableMemDiagonal
theorem preimage_coe_coe_diagonal (s : Set α) :
Prod.map (fun x : s => (x : α)) (fun x : s => (x : α)) ⁻¹' diagonal α = diagonal s := by
ext ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
simp [Set.diagonal]
#align set.preimage_coe_coe_diagonal Set.preimage_coe_coe_diagonal
@[simp]
theorem range_diag : (range fun x => (x, x)) = diagonal α := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [diagonal, eq_comm]
#align set.range_diag Set.range_diag
theorem diagonal_subset_iff {s} : diagonal α ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, (x, x) ∈ s := by
rw [← range_diag, range_subset_iff]
#align set.diagonal_subset_iff Set.diagonal_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint : s ×ˢ t ⊆ (diagonal α)ᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
prod_subset_iff.trans disjoint_iff_forall_ne.symm
#align set.prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint Set.prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint
@[simp]
theorem diag_preimage_prod (s t : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align set.diag_preimage_prod Set.diag_preimage_prod
theorem diag_preimage_prod_self (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s = s :=
inter_self s
#align set.diag_preimage_prod_self Set.diag_preimage_prod_self
theorem diag_image (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) '' s = diagonal α ∩ s ×ˢ s := by
rw [← range_diag, ← image_preimage_eq_range_inter, diag_preimage_prod_self]
#align set.diag_image Set.diag_image
theorem diagonal_eq_univ_iff : diagonal α = univ ↔ Subsingleton α := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, eq_univ_iff_forall, Prod.forall, mem_diagonal_iff]
theorem diagonal_eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : diagonal α = univ := diagonal_eq_univ_iff.2 ‹_›
end Diagonal
/-- A function is `Function.const α a` for some `a` if and only if `∀ x y, f x = f y`. -/
theorem range_const_eq_diagonal {α β : Type*} [hβ : Nonempty β] :
range (const α) = {f : α → β | ∀ x y, f x = f y} := by
refine (range_eq_iff _ _).mpr ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl, fun f hf ↦ ?_⟩
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with h|⟨⟨a⟩⟩
· exact hβ.elim fun b ↦ ⟨b, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· exact ⟨f a, funext fun x ↦ hf _ _⟩
end Set
section Pullback
open Set
variable {X Y Z}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y Z$. -/
abbrev Function.Pullback (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) := {p : X × Z // f p.1 = g p.2}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y X$. -/
abbrev Function.PullbackSelf (f : X → Y) := f.Pullback f
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the first factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : X := p.val.1
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the second factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : Z := p.val.2
open Function.Pullback in
lemma Function.pullback_comm_sq (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) :
f ∘ @fst X Y Z f g = g ∘ @snd X Y Z f g := funext fun p ↦ p.2
/-- The diagonal map $\Delta: X \to X \times_Y X$. -/
def toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (x : X) : f.Pullback f := ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
/-- The diagonal $\Delta(X) \subseteq X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.pullbackDiagonal (f : X → Y) : Set (f.Pullback f) := {p | p.fst = p.snd}
/-- Three functions between the three pairs of spaces $X_i, Y_i, Z_i$ that are compatible
induce a function $X_1 \times_{Y_1} Z_1 \to X_2 \times_{Y_2} Z_2$. -/
def Function.mapPullback {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂}
{f₁ : X₁ → Y₁} {g₁ : Z₁ → Y₁} {f₂ : X₂ → Y₂} {g₂ : Z₂ → Y₂}
(mapX : X₁ → X₂) (mapY : Y₁ → Y₂) (mapZ : Z₁ → Z₂)
(commX : f₂ ∘ mapX = mapY ∘ f₁) (commZ : g₂ ∘ mapZ = mapY ∘ g₁)
(p : f₁.Pullback g₁) : f₂.Pullback g₂ :=
⟨(mapX p.fst, mapZ p.snd),
(congr_fun commX _).trans <| (congr_arg mapY p.2).trans <| congr_fun commZ.symm _⟩
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_Z (X \times_Y Z) \to X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@snd X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → f.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback fst g fst (pullback_comm_sq f g) (pullback_comm_sq f g)
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_X (X \times_Y Z) \to Z \times_Y Z$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@fst X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → g.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback snd f snd (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm
open Function.PullbackSelf Function.Pullback
theorem preimage_map_fst_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
@map_fst X Y Z f g ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (@snd X Y Z f g) := by
ext ⟨⟨p₁, p₂⟩, he⟩
simp_rw [pullbackDiagonal, mem_setOf, Subtype.ext_iff, Prod.ext_iff]
exact (and_iff_left he).symm
theorem Function.Injective.preimage_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → X} (inj : g.Injective) :
mapPullback g id g (by rfl) (by rfl) ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (f ∘ g) :=
ext fun _ ↦ inj.eq_iff
theorem image_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (s : Set X) :
toPullbackDiag f '' s = pullbackDiagonal f ∩ Subtype.val ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, hx, hx⟩
· obtain ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ := x
rintro ⟨rfl : x = y, h2x⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ h2x.1
theorem range_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : range (toPullbackDiag f) = pullbackDiagonal f := by
rw [← image_univ, image_toPullbackDiag, univ_prod_univ, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
theorem injective_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : (toPullbackDiag f).Injective :=
fun _ _ h ↦ congr_arg Prod.fst (congr_arg Subtype.val h)
end Pullback
namespace Set
section OffDiag
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} {x : α × α} {a : α}
theorem offDiag_mono : Monotone (offDiag : Set α → Set (α × α)) := fun _ _ h _ =>
And.imp (@h _) <| And.imp_left <| @h _
#align set.off_diag_mono Set.offDiag_mono
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_nonempty : s.offDiag.Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [offDiag, Set.Nonempty, Set.Nontrivial]
#align set.off_diag_nonempty Set.offDiag_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_eq_empty : s.offDiag = ∅ ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← not_nontrivial_iff, offDiag_nonempty.not]
#align set.off_diag_eq_empty Set.offDiag_eq_empty
alias ⟨_, Nontrivial.offDiag_nonempty⟩ := offDiag_nonempty
#align set.nontrivial.off_diag_nonempty Set.Nontrivial.offDiag_nonempty
alias ⟨_, Subsingleton.offDiag_eq_empty⟩ := offDiag_nonempty
#align set.subsingleton.off_diag_eq_empty Set.Subsingleton.offDiag_eq_empty
variable (s t)
theorem offDiag_subset_prod : s.offDiag ⊆ s ×ˢ s := fun _ hx => ⟨hx.1, hx.2.1⟩
#align set.off_diag_subset_prod Set.offDiag_subset_prod
theorem offDiag_eq_sep_prod : s.offDiag = { x ∈ s ×ˢ s | x.1 ≠ x.2 } :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc.symm
#align set.off_diag_eq_sep_prod Set.offDiag_eq_sep_prod
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_empty : (∅ : Set α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp
#align set.off_diag_empty Set.offDiag_empty
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp
#align set.off_diag_singleton Set.offDiag_singleton
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_univ : (univ : Set α).offDiag = (diagonal α)ᶜ :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.off_diag_univ Set.offDiag_univ
@[simp]
theorem prod_sdiff_diagonal : s ×ˢ s \ diagonal α = s.offDiag :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
#align set.prod_sdiff_diagonal Set.prod_sdiff_diagonal
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_diagonal_offDiag : Disjoint (diagonal α) s.offDiag :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ hd ho => ho.2.2 hd
#align set.disjoint_diagonal_off_diag Set.disjoint_diagonal_offDiag
theorem offDiag_inter : (s ∩ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∩ t.offDiag :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_offDiag, mem_inter_iff]
tauto
#align set.off_diag_inter Set.offDiag_inter
variable {s t}
theorem offDiag_union (h : Disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ t.offDiag ∪ s ×ˢ t ∪ t ×ˢ s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_offDiag, mem_union, ne_eq, mem_prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨h0|h0, h1|h1, h2⟩ <;> simp [h0, h1, h2]
· rintro (((⟨h0, h1, h2⟩|⟨h0, h1, h2⟩)|⟨h0, h1⟩)|⟨h0, h1⟩) <;> simp [*]
· rintro h3
rw [h3] at h0
exact Set.disjoint_left.mp h h0 h1
· rintro h3
rw [h3] at h0
exact (Set.disjoint_right.mp h h0 h1).elim
#align set.off_diag_union Set.offDiag_union
theorem offDiag_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ {a} ×ˢ s ∪ s ×ˢ {a} := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, offDiag_union, offDiag_singleton, union_empty, union_right_comm]
rw [disjoint_left]
rintro b hb (rfl : b = a)
exact ha hb
#align set.off_diag_insert Set.offDiag_insert
end OffDiag
/-! ### Cartesian set-indexed product of sets -/
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {α β : ι → Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set ι} {t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {i : ι}
@[simp]
theorem empty_pi (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : pi ∅ s = univ := by
ext
simp [pi]
#align set.empty_pi Set.empty_pi
theorem subsingleton_univ_pi (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Subsingleton) :
(univ.pi t).Subsingleton := fun _f hf _g hg ↦ funext fun i ↦
(ht i) (hf _ <| mem_univ _) (hg _ <| mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ (s : Set ι) : (pi s fun i => (univ : Set (α i))) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ _ _ => mem_univ _
#align set.pi_univ Set.pi_univ
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_ite (s : Set ι) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
(pi univ fun i => if i ∈ s then t i else univ) = s.pi t := by
ext; simp_rw [Set.mem_pi]; apply forall_congr'; intro i; split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem pi_mono (h : ∀ i ∈ s, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : pi s t₁ ⊆ pi s t₂ := fun _ hx i hi => h i hi <| hx i hi
#align set.pi_mono Set.pi_mono
theorem pi_inter_distrib : (s.pi fun i => t i ∩ t₁ i) = s.pi t ∩ s.pi t₁ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [forall_and, mem_pi, mem_inter_iff]
#align set.pi_inter_distrib Set.pi_inter_distrib
theorem pi_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s₁, t₁ i = t₂ i) : s₁.pi t₁ = s₂.pi t₂ :=
h ▸ ext fun _ => forall₂_congr fun i hi => h' i hi ▸ Iff.rfl
#align set.pi_congr Set.pi_congr
theorem pi_eq_empty (hs : i ∈ s) (ht : t i = ∅) : s.pi t = ∅ := by
ext f
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, not_forall, iff_false_iff, mem_pi, Classical.not_imp]
exact ⟨i, hs, by simp [ht]⟩
#align set.pi_eq_empty Set.pi_eq_empty
theorem univ_pi_eq_empty (ht : t i = ∅) : pi univ t = ∅ :=
pi_eq_empty (mem_univ i) ht
#align set.univ_pi_eq_empty Set.univ_pi_eq_empty
theorem pi_nonempty_iff : (s.pi t).Nonempty ↔ ∀ i, ∃ x, i ∈ s → x ∈ t i := by
simp [Classical.skolem, Set.Nonempty]
#align set.pi_nonempty_iff Set.pi_nonempty_iff
theorem univ_pi_nonempty_iff : (pi univ t).Nonempty ↔ ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty := by
simp [Classical.skolem, Set.Nonempty]
#align set.univ_pi_nonempty_iff Set.univ_pi_nonempty_iff
theorem pi_eq_empty_iff : s.pi t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, IsEmpty (α i) ∨ i ∈ s ∧ t i = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, pi_nonempty_iff]
push_neg
refine exists_congr fun i => ?_
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty (α i) <;> simp [*, forall_and, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.pi_eq_empty_iff Set.pi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 761 | 762 | theorem univ_pi_eq_empty_iff : pi univ t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, t i = ∅ := by |
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, univ_pi_nonempty_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Subobjects
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Submonoid.Centralizer
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.subsemiring.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b915e9392ecb2a861e1e766f0e1df6ac481188ca"
/-!
# Bundled subsemirings
We define bundled subsemirings and some standard constructions: `CompleteLattice` structure,
`Subtype` and `inclusion` ring homomorphisms, subsemiring `map`, `comap` and range (`rangeS`) of
a `RingHom` etc.
-/
universe u v w
section AddSubmonoidWithOneClass
/-- `AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R` says `S` is a type of subsets `s ≤ R` that contain `0`, `1`,
and are closed under `(+)` -/
class AddSubmonoidWithOneClass (S R : Type*) [AddMonoidWithOne R]
[SetLike S R] extends AddSubmonoidClass S R, OneMemClass S R : Prop
#align add_submonoid_with_one_class AddSubmonoidWithOneClass
variable {S R : Type*} [AddMonoidWithOne R] [SetLike S R] (s : S)
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem natCast_mem [AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R] (n : ℕ) : (n : R) ∈ s := by
induction n <;> simp [zero_mem, add_mem, one_mem, *]
#align nat_cast_mem natCast_mem
#align coe_nat_mem natCast_mem
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated] alias coe_nat_mem := natCast_mem
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
lemma ofNat_mem [AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R] (s : S) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ∈ s := by
rw [← Nat.cast_eq_ofNat]; exact natCast_mem s n
instance (priority := 74) AddSubmonoidWithOneClass.toAddMonoidWithOne
[AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R] : AddMonoidWithOne s :=
{ AddSubmonoidClass.toAddMonoid s with
one := ⟨_, one_mem s⟩
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, natCast_mem s n⟩
natCast_zero := Subtype.ext Nat.cast_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => Subtype.ext (Nat.cast_succ _) }
#align add_submonoid_with_one_class.to_add_monoid_with_one AddSubmonoidWithOneClass.toAddMonoidWithOne
end AddSubmonoidWithOneClass
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} [NonAssocSemiring R] (M : Submonoid R)
section SubsemiringClass
/-- `SubsemiringClass S R` states that `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ R` that
are both a multiplicative and an additive submonoid. -/
class SubsemiringClass (S : Type*) (R : Type u) [NonAssocSemiring R]
[SetLike S R] extends SubmonoidClass S R, AddSubmonoidClass S R : Prop
#align subsemiring_class SubsemiringClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SubsemiringClass.addSubmonoidWithOneClass (S : Type*)
(R : Type u) [NonAssocSemiring R] [SetLike S R] [h : SubsemiringClass S R] :
AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R :=
{ h with }
#align subsemiring_class.add_submonoid_with_one_class SubsemiringClass.addSubmonoidWithOneClass
variable [SetLike S R] [hSR : SubsemiringClass S R] (s : S)
namespace SubsemiringClass
-- Prefer subclasses of `NonAssocSemiring` over subclasses of `SubsemiringClass`.
/-- A subsemiring of a `NonAssocSemiring` inherits a `NonAssocSemiring` structure -/
instance (priority := 75) toNonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.nonAssocSemiring (↑) rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align subsemiring_class.to_non_assoc_semiring SubsemiringClass.toNonAssocSemiring
instance nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial s :=
nontrivial_of_ne 0 1 fun H => zero_ne_one (congr_arg Subtype.val H)
#align subsemiring_class.nontrivial SubsemiringClass.nontrivial
instance noZeroDivisors [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.noZeroDivisors _ rfl fun _ _ => rfl
#align subsemiring_class.no_zero_divisors SubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors
/-- The natural ring hom from a subsemiring of semiring `R` to `R`. -/
def subtype : s →+* R :=
{ SubmonoidClass.subtype s, AddSubmonoidClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
#align subsemiring_class.subtype SubsemiringClass.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → R) = ((↑) : s → R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring_class.coe_subtype SubsemiringClass.coe_subtype
-- Prefer subclasses of `Semiring` over subclasses of `SubsemiringClass`.
/-- A subsemiring of a `Semiring` is a `Semiring`. -/
instance (priority := 75) toSemiring {R} [Semiring R] [SetLike S R] [SubsemiringClass S R] :
Semiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.semiring (↑) rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align subsemiring_class.to_semiring SubsemiringClass.toSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow {R} [Semiring R] [SetLike S R] [SubsemiringClass S R] (x : s) (n : ℕ) :
((x ^ n : s) : R) = (x : R) ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, ih]
#align subsemiring_class.coe_pow SubsemiringClass.coe_pow
/-- A subsemiring of a `CommSemiring` is a `CommSemiring`. -/
instance toCommSemiring {R} [CommSemiring R] [SetLike S R] [SubsemiringClass S R] :
CommSemiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commSemiring (↑) rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align subsemiring_class.to_comm_semiring SubsemiringClass.toCommSemiring
instance instCharZero [CharZero R] : CharZero s :=
⟨Function.Injective.of_comp (f := Subtype.val) (g := Nat.cast (R := s)) Nat.cast_injective⟩
end SubsemiringClass
end SubsemiringClass
variable [NonAssocSemiring S] [NonAssocSemiring T]
/-- A subsemiring of a semiring `R` is a subset `s` that is both a multiplicative and an additive
submonoid. -/
structure Subsemiring (R : Type u) [NonAssocSemiring R] extends Submonoid R, AddSubmonoid R
#align subsemiring Subsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `Subsemiring` as a `Submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subsemiring.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `Subsemiring` as an `AddSubmonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid
namespace Subsemiring
instance : SetLike (Subsemiring R) R where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : SubsemiringClass (Subsemiring R) R where
zero_mem := zero_mem'
add_mem {s} := AddSubsemigroup.add_mem' s.toAddSubmonoid.toAddSubsemigroup
one_mem {s} := Submonoid.one_mem' s.toSubmonoid
mul_mem {s} := Subsemigroup.mul_mem' s.toSubmonoid.toSubsemigroup
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubmonoid {s : Subsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_to_submonoid Subsemiring.mem_toSubmonoid
-- `@[simp]` -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove thisrove this
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_carrier Subsemiring.mem_carrier
/-- Two subsemirings are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : Subsemiring R} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subsemiring.ext Subsemiring.ext
/-- Copy of a subsemiring with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : Subsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : Subsemiring R :=
{ S.toAddSubmonoid.copy s hs, S.toSubmonoid.copy s hs with carrier := s }
#align subsemiring.copy Subsemiring.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : Subsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_copy Subsemiring.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (S : Subsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subsemiring.copy_eq Subsemiring.copy_eq
theorem toSubmonoid_injective : Function.Injective (toSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → Submonoid R)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align subsemiring.to_submonoid_injective Subsemiring.toSubmonoid_injective
@[mono]
theorem toSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → Submonoid R) :=
fun _ _ => id
#align subsemiring.to_submonoid_strict_mono Subsemiring.toSubmonoid_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → Submonoid R) :=
toSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subsemiring.to_submonoid_mono Subsemiring.toSubmonoid_mono
theorem toAddSubmonoid_injective :
Function.Injective (toAddSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_injective Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_injective
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toAddSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R) :=
fun _ _ => id
#align subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toAddSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R) :=
toAddSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_mono Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_mono
/-- Construct a `Subsemiring R` from a set `s`, a submonoid `sm`, and an additive
submonoid `sa` such that `x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ sm ↔ x ∈ sa`. -/
protected def mk' (s : Set R) (sm : Submonoid R) (hm : ↑sm = s) (sa : AddSubmonoid R)
(ha : ↑sa = s) : Subsemiring R where
carrier := s
zero_mem' := by exact ha ▸ sa.zero_mem
one_mem' := by exact hm ▸ sm.one_mem
add_mem' {x y} := by simpa only [← ha] using sa.add_mem
mul_mem' {x y} := by simpa only [← hm] using sm.mul_mem
#align subsemiring.mk' Subsemiring.mk'
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R} (ha : ↑sa = s) :
(Subsemiring.mk' s sm hm sa ha : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_mk' Subsemiring.coe_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk' {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R} (ha : ↑sa = s)
{x : R} : x ∈ Subsemiring.mk' s sm hm sa ha ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_mk' Subsemiring.mem_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_toSubmonoid {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (Subsemiring.mk' s sm hm sa ha).toSubmonoid = sm :=
SetLike.coe_injective hm.symm
#align subsemiring.mk'_to_submonoid Subsemiring.mk'_toSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem mk'_toAddSubmonoid {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (Subsemiring.mk' s sm hm sa ha).toAddSubmonoid = sa :=
SetLike.coe_injective ha.symm
#align subsemiring.mk'_to_add_submonoid Subsemiring.mk'_toAddSubmonoid
end Subsemiring
namespace Subsemiring
variable (s : Subsemiring R)
/-- A subsemiring contains the semiring's 1. -/
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : R) ∈ s :=
one_mem s
#align subsemiring.one_mem Subsemiring.one_mem
/-- A subsemiring contains the semiring's 0. -/
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : R) ∈ s :=
zero_mem s
#align subsemiring.zero_mem Subsemiring.zero_mem
/-- A subsemiring is closed under multiplication. -/
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : R} : x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s :=
mul_mem
#align subsemiring.mul_mem Subsemiring.mul_mem
/-- A subsemiring is closed under addition. -/
protected theorem add_mem {x y : R} : x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s :=
add_mem
#align subsemiring.add_mem Subsemiring.add_mem
/-- Product of a list of elements in a `Subsemiring` is in the `Subsemiring`. -/
nonrec theorem list_prod_mem {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) {l : List R} :
(∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s) → l.prod ∈ s :=
list_prod_mem
#align subsemiring.list_prod_mem Subsemiring.list_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a list of elements in a `Subsemiring` is in the `Subsemiring`. -/
protected theorem list_sum_mem {l : List R} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s) → l.sum ∈ s :=
list_sum_mem
#align subsemiring.list_sum_mem Subsemiring.list_sum_mem
/-- Product of a multiset of elements in a `Subsemiring` of a `CommSemiring`
is in the `Subsemiring`. -/
protected theorem multiset_prod_mem {R} [CommSemiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) (m : Multiset R) :
(∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s) → m.prod ∈ s :=
multiset_prod_mem m
#align subsemiring.multiset_prod_mem Subsemiring.multiset_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a multiset of elements in a `Subsemiring` of a `Semiring` is
in the `add_subsemiring`. -/
protected theorem multiset_sum_mem (m : Multiset R) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s) → m.sum ∈ s :=
multiset_sum_mem m
#align subsemiring.multiset_sum_mem Subsemiring.multiset_sum_mem
/-- Product of elements of a subsemiring of a `CommSemiring` indexed by a `Finset` is in the
subsemiring. -/
protected theorem prod_mem {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) {ι : Type*}
{t : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ s) : (∏ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ s :=
prod_mem h
#align subsemiring.prod_mem Subsemiring.prod_mem
/-- Sum of elements in a `Subsemiring` of a `Semiring` indexed by a `Finset`
is in the `add_subsemiring`. -/
protected theorem sum_mem (s : Subsemiring R) {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → R}
(h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ s) : (∑ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ s :=
sum_mem h
#align subsemiring.sum_mem Subsemiring.sum_mem
/-- A subsemiring of a `NonAssocSemiring` inherits a `NonAssocSemiring` structure -/
instance toNonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring s :=
-- Porting note: this used to be a specialized instance which needed to be expensively unified.
SubsemiringClass.toNonAssocSemiring _
#align subsemiring.to_non_assoc_semiring Subsemiring.toNonAssocSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : s) : R) = (1 : R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_one Subsemiring.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : s) : R) = (0 : R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_zero Subsemiring.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : s) : ((x + y : s) : R) = (x + y : R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_add Subsemiring.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : s) : ((x * y : s) : R) = (x * y : R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_mul Subsemiring.coe_mul
instance nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial s :=
nontrivial_of_ne 0 1 fun H => zero_ne_one (congr_arg Subtype.val H)
#align subsemiring.nontrivial Subsemiring.nontrivial
protected theorem pow_mem {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) {x : R} (hx : x ∈ s)
(n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ s :=
pow_mem hx n
#align subsemiring.pow_mem Subsemiring.pow_mem
instance noZeroDivisors [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors s where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {_ _} h :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero <| Subtype.ext_iff.mp h).imp Subtype.eq Subtype.eq
#align subsemiring.no_zero_divisors Subsemiring.noZeroDivisors
/-- A subsemiring of a `Semiring` is a `Semiring`. -/
instance toSemiring {R} [Semiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) : Semiring s :=
{ s.toNonAssocSemiring, s.toSubmonoid.toMonoid with }
#align subsemiring.to_semiring Subsemiring.toSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow {R} [Semiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) (x : s) (n : ℕ) :
((x ^ n : s) : R) = (x : R) ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, ih]
#align subsemiring.coe_pow Subsemiring.coe_pow
/-- A subsemiring of a `CommSemiring` is a `CommSemiring`. -/
instance toCommSemiring {R} [CommSemiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) : CommSemiring s :=
{ s.toSemiring with mul_comm := fun _ _ => Subtype.eq <| mul_comm _ _ }
#align subsemiring.to_comm_semiring Subsemiring.toCommSemiring
/-- The natural ring hom from a subsemiring of semiring `R` to `R`. -/
def subtype : s →+* R :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.subtype, s.toAddSubmonoid.subtype with toFun := (↑) }
#align subsemiring.subtype Subsemiring.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : ⇑s.subtype = ((↑) : s → R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_subtype Subsemiring.coe_subtype
protected theorem nsmul_mem {x : R} (hx : x ∈ s) (n : ℕ) : n • x ∈ s :=
nsmul_mem hx n
#align subsemiring.nsmul_mem Subsemiring.nsmul_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmonoid (s : Subsemiring R) : (s.toSubmonoid : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_to_submonoid Subsemiring.coe_toSubmonoid
-- Porting note: adding this as `simp`-normal form for `coe_toAddSubmonoid`
@[simp]
theorem coe_carrier_toSubmonoid (s : Subsemiring R) : (s.toSubmonoid.carrier : Set R) = s :=
rfl
-- Porting note: can be proven using `SetLike` so removing `@[simp]`
theorem mem_toAddSubmonoid {s : Subsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toAddSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_to_add_submonoid Subsemiring.mem_toAddSubmonoid
-- Porting note: new normal form is `coe_carrier_toSubmonoid` so removing `@[simp]`
theorem coe_toAddSubmonoid (s : Subsemiring R) : (s.toAddSubmonoid : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_to_add_submonoid Subsemiring.coe_toAddSubmonoid
/-- The subsemiring `R` of the semiring `R`. -/
instance : Top (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submonoid R), (⊤ : AddSubmonoid R) with }⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : R) : x ∈ (⊤ : Subsemiring R) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align subsemiring.mem_top Subsemiring.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_top Subsemiring.coe_top
/-- The ring equiv between the top element of `Subsemiring R` and `R`. -/
@[simps]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subsemiring R) ≃+* R where
toFun r := r
invFun r := ⟨r, Subsemiring.mem_top r⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_mul' := (⊤ : Subsemiring R).coe_mul
map_add' := (⊤ : Subsemiring R).coe_add
#align subsemiring.top_equiv Subsemiring.topEquiv
/-- The preimage of a subsemiring along a ring homomorphism is a subsemiring. -/
def comap (f : R →+* S) (s : Subsemiring S) : Subsemiring R :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.comap (f : R →* S), s.toAddSubmonoid.comap (f : R →+ S) with carrier := f ⁻¹' s }
#align subsemiring.comap Subsemiring.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (s : Subsemiring S) (f : R →+* S) : (s.comap f : Set R) = f ⁻¹' s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_comap Subsemiring.coe_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {s : Subsemiring S} {f : R →+* S} {x : R} : x ∈ s.comap f ↔ f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_comap Subsemiring.mem_comap
theorem comap_comap (s : Subsemiring T) (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S) :
(s.comap g).comap f = s.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.comap_comap Subsemiring.comap_comap
/-- The image of a subsemiring along a ring homomorphism is a subsemiring. -/
def map (f : R →+* S) (s : Subsemiring R) : Subsemiring S :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.map (f : R →* S), s.toAddSubmonoid.map (f : R →+ S) with carrier := f '' s }
#align subsemiring.map Subsemiring.map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : R →+* S) (s : Subsemiring R) : (s.map f : Set S) = f '' s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_map Subsemiring.coe_map
@[simp]
lemma mem_map {f : R →+* S} {s : Subsemiring R} {y : S} : y ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, f x = y := Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_map Subsemiring.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : s.map (RingHom.id R) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
#align subsemiring.map_id Subsemiring.map_id
theorem map_map (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
#align subsemiring.map_map Subsemiring.map_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : R →+* S} {s : Subsemiring R} {t : Subsemiring S} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
Set.image_subset_iff
#align subsemiring.map_le_iff_le_comap Subsemiring.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (f : R →+* S) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align subsemiring.gc_map_comap Subsemiring.gc_map_comap
/-- A subsemiring is isomorphic to its image under an injective function -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) : s ≃+* s.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f s hf with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (f.map_mul _ _)
map_add' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (f.map_add _ _) }
#align subsemiring.equiv_map_of_injective Subsemiring.equivMapOfInjective
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : s) :
(equivMapOfInjective s f hf x : S) = f x :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply Subsemiring.coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply
end Subsemiring
namespace RingHom
variable (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S)
/-- The range of a ring homomorphism is a subsemiring. See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def rangeS : Subsemiring S :=
((⊤ : Subsemiring R).map f).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
#align ring_hom.srange RingHom.rangeS
@[simp]
theorem coe_rangeS : (f.rangeS : Set S) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.coe_srange RingHom.coe_rangeS
@[simp]
theorem mem_rangeS {f : R →+* S} {y : S} : y ∈ f.rangeS ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align ring_hom.mem_srange RingHom.mem_rangeS
theorem rangeS_eq_map (f : R →+* S) : f.rangeS = (⊤ : Subsemiring R).map f := by
ext
simp
#align ring_hom.srange_eq_map RingHom.rangeS_eq_map
theorem mem_rangeS_self (f : R →+* S) (x : R) : f x ∈ f.rangeS :=
mem_rangeS.mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align ring_hom.mem_srange_self RingHom.mem_rangeS_self
theorem map_rangeS : f.rangeS.map g = (g.comp f).rangeS := by
simpa only [rangeS_eq_map] using (⊤ : Subsemiring R).map_map g f
#align ring_hom.map_srange RingHom.map_rangeS
/-- The range of a morphism of semirings is a fintype, if the domain is a fintype.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` in the
presence of `Fintype S`. -/
instance fintypeRangeS [Fintype R] [DecidableEq S] (f : R →+* S) : Fintype (rangeS f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
#align ring_hom.fintype_srange RingHom.fintypeRangeS
end RingHom
namespace Subsemiring
instance : Bot (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨(Nat.castRingHom R).rangeS⟩
instance : Inhabited (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨⊥⟩
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = Set.range ((↑) : ℕ → R) :=
(Nat.castRingHom R).coe_rangeS
#align subsemiring.coe_bot Subsemiring.coe_bot
theorem mem_bot {x : R} : x ∈ (⊥ : Subsemiring R) ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ↑n = x :=
RingHom.mem_rangeS
#align subsemiring.mem_bot Subsemiring.mem_bot
/-- The inf of two subsemirings is their intersection. -/
instance : Inf (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨fun s t =>
{ s.toSubmonoid ⊓ t.toSubmonoid, s.toAddSubmonoid ⊓ t.toAddSubmonoid with carrier := s ∩ t }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : Subsemiring R) : ((p ⊓ p' : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = (p : Set R) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_inf Subsemiring.coe_inf
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : Subsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_inf Subsemiring.mem_inf
instance : InfSet (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨fun s =>
Subsemiring.mk' (⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t) (⨅ t ∈ s, Subsemiring.toSubmonoid t) (by simp)
(⨅ t ∈ s, Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid t)
(by simp)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (Subsemiring R)) : ((sInf S : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_Inf Subsemiring.coe_sInf
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subsemiring R)} {x : R} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align subsemiring.mem_Inf Subsemiring.mem_sInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubmonoid (s : Set (Subsemiring R)) :
(sInf s).toSubmonoid = ⨅ t ∈ s, Subsemiring.toSubmonoid t :=
mk'_toSubmonoid _ _
#align subsemiring.Inf_to_submonoid Subsemiring.sInf_toSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toAddSubmonoid (s : Set (Subsemiring R)) :
(sInf s).toAddSubmonoid = ⨅ t ∈ s, Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid t :=
mk'_toAddSubmonoid _ _
#align subsemiring.Inf_to_add_submonoid Subsemiring.sInf_toAddSubmonoid
/-- Subsemirings of a semiring form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (Subsemiring R) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subsemiring R) fun _ =>
IsGLB.of_image
(fun {s t : Subsemiring R} => show (s : Set R) ⊆ t ↔ s ≤ t from SetLike.coe_subset_coe)
isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun s _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := mem_bot.1 hx
hn ▸ natCast_mem s n
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _ _ => trivial
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩ }
theorem eq_top_iff' (A : Subsemiring R) : A = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : R, x ∈ A :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
#align subsemiring.eq_top_iff' Subsemiring.eq_top_iff'
section NonAssocSemiring
variable (R) [NonAssocSemiring R]
/-- The center of a non-associative semiring `R` is the set of elements that commute and associate
with everything in `R` -/
def center : Subsemiring R :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiring.center R with
one_mem' := Set.one_mem_center R }
#align subsemiring.center Subsemiring.center
theorem coe_center : ↑(center R) = Set.center R :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_center Subsemiring.coe_center
@[simp]
theorem center_toSubmonoid : (center R).toSubmonoid = Submonoid.center R :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.center_to_submonoid Subsemiring.center_toSubmonoid
/-- The center is commutative and associative.
This is not an instance as it forms a non-defeq diamond with
`NonUnitalSubringClass.tNonUnitalring ` in the `npow` field. -/
abbrev center.commSemiring' : CommSemiring (center R) :=
{ Submonoid.center.commMonoid', (center R).toNonAssocSemiring with }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
/-- The center is commutative. -/
instance center.commSemiring {R} [Semiring R] : CommSemiring (center R) :=
{ Submonoid.center.commMonoid, (center R).toSemiring with }
-- no instance diamond, unlike the primed version
example {R} [Semiring R] :
center.commSemiring.toSemiring = Subsemiring.toSemiring (center R) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem mem_center_iff {R} [Semiring R] {z : R} : z ∈ center R ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g :=
Subsemigroup.mem_center_iff
#align subsemiring.mem_center_iff Subsemiring.mem_center_iff
instance decidableMemCenter {R} [Semiring R] [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ center R) := fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ mem_center_iff
#align subsemiring.decidable_mem_center Subsemiring.decidableMemCenter
@[simp]
theorem center_eq_top (R) [CommSemiring R] : center R = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.center_eq_univ R)
#align subsemiring.center_eq_top Subsemiring.center_eq_top
end Semiring
section Centralizer
/-- The centralizer of a set as subsemiring. -/
def centralizer {R} [Semiring R] (s : Set R) : Subsemiring R :=
{ Submonoid.centralizer s with
carrier := s.centralizer
zero_mem' := Set.zero_mem_centralizer _
add_mem' := Set.add_mem_centralizer }
#align subsemiring.centralizer Subsemiring.centralizer
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_centralizer {R} [Semiring R] (s : Set R) : (centralizer s : Set R) = s.centralizer :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_centralizer Subsemiring.coe_centralizer
theorem centralizer_toSubmonoid {R} [Semiring R] (s : Set R) :
(centralizer s).toSubmonoid = Submonoid.centralizer s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.centralizer_to_submonoid Subsemiring.centralizer_toSubmonoid
theorem mem_centralizer_iff {R} [Semiring R] {s : Set R} {z : R} :
z ∈ centralizer s ↔ ∀ g ∈ s, g * z = z * g :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_centralizer_iff Subsemiring.mem_centralizer_iff
theorem center_le_centralizer {R} [Semiring R] (s) : center R ≤ centralizer s :=
s.center_subset_centralizer
#align subsemiring.center_le_centralizer Subsemiring.center_le_centralizer
theorem centralizer_le {R} [Semiring R] (s t : Set R) (h : s ⊆ t) : centralizer t ≤ centralizer s :=
Set.centralizer_subset h
#align subsemiring.centralizer_le Subsemiring.centralizer_le
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset {R} [Semiring R] {s : Set R} :
centralizer s = ⊤ ↔ s ⊆ center R :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans Set.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
#align subsemiring.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset Subsemiring.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_univ {R} [Semiring R] : centralizer Set.univ = center R :=
SetLike.ext' (Set.centralizer_univ R)
#align subsemiring.centralizer_univ Subsemiring.centralizer_univ
lemma le_centralizer_centralizer {R} [Semiring R] {s : Subsemiring R} :
s ≤ centralizer (centralizer (s : Set R)) :=
Set.subset_centralizer_centralizer
@[simp]
lemma centralizer_centralizer_centralizer {R} [Semiring R] {s : Set R} :
centralizer s.centralizer.centralizer = centralizer s := by
apply SetLike.coe_injective
simp only [coe_centralizer, Set.centralizer_centralizer_centralizer]
end Centralizer
/-- The `Subsemiring` generated by a set. -/
def closure (s : Set R) : Subsemiring R :=
sInf { S | s ⊆ S }
#align subsemiring.closure Subsemiring.closure
theorem mem_closure {x : R} {s : Set R} : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ S : Subsemiring R, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
#align subsemiring.mem_closure Subsemiring.mem_closure
/-- The subsemiring generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_closure {s : Set R} : s ⊆ closure s := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hS => hS hx
#align subsemiring.subset_closure Subsemiring.subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {s : Set R} {P : R} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align subsemiring.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure Subsemiring.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
/-- A subsemiring `S` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_le {s : Set R} {t : Subsemiring R} : closure s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Set.Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
#align subsemiring.closure_le Subsemiring.closure_le
/-- Subsemiring closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure s ≤ closure t`. -/
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set R⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ≤ closure t :=
closure_le.2 <| Set.Subset.trans h subset_closure
#align subsemiring.closure_mono Subsemiring.closure_mono
theorem closure_eq_of_le {s : Set R} {t : Subsemiring R} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ≤ closure s) :
closure s = t :=
le_antisymm (closure_le.2 h₁) h₂
#align subsemiring.closure_eq_of_le Subsemiring.closure_eq_of_le
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : R ≃+* S} {K : Subsemiring R} {x : S} :
x ∈ K.map (f : R →+* S) ↔ f.symm x ∈ K := by
convert @Set.mem_image_equiv _ _ (↑K) f.toEquiv x using 1
#align subsemiring.mem_map_equiv Subsemiring.mem_map_equiv
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : Subsemiring R) :
K.map (f : R →+* S) = K.comap f.symm :=
SetLike.coe_injective (f.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage K)
#align subsemiring.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm Subsemiring.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : Subsemiring S) :
K.comap (f : R →+* S) = K.map f.symm :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
#align subsemiring.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm Subsemiring.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm
end Subsemiring
namespace Submonoid
/-- The additive closure of a submonoid is a subsemiring. -/
def subsemiringClosure (M : Submonoid R) : Subsemiring R :=
{ AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) with
one_mem' := AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mpr fun _ hy => hy M.one_mem
mul_mem' := MulMemClass.mul_mem_add_closure }
#align submonoid.subsemiring_closure Submonoid.subsemiringClosure
theorem subsemiringClosure_coe :
(M.subsemiringClosure : Set R) = AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) :=
rfl
#align submonoid.subsemiring_closure_coe Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_coe
theorem subsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid :
M.subsemiringClosure.toAddSubmonoid = AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) :=
rfl
#align submonoid.subsemiring_closure_to_add_submonoid Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid
/-- The `Subsemiring` generated by a multiplicative submonoid coincides with the
`Subsemiring.closure` of the submonoid itself . -/
theorem subsemiringClosure_eq_closure : M.subsemiringClosure = Subsemiring.closure (M : Set R) := by
ext
refine
⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx =>
(Subsemiring.mem_closure.mp hx) M.subsemiringClosure fun s sM => ?_⟩
<;> rintro - ⟨H1, rfl⟩
<;> rintro - ⟨H2, rfl⟩
· exact AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp hx H1.toAddSubmonoid H2
· exact H2 sM
#align submonoid.subsemiring_closure_eq_closure Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_eq_closure
end Submonoid
namespace Subsemiring
@[simp]
theorem closure_submonoid_closure (s : Set R) : closure ↑(Submonoid.closure s) = closure s :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le.mpr fun _ hy =>
(Submonoid.mem_closure.mp hy) (closure s).toSubmonoid subset_closure)
(closure_mono Submonoid.subset_closure)
#align subsemiring.closure_submonoid_closure Subsemiring.closure_submonoid_closure
/-- The elements of the subsemiring closure of `M` are exactly the elements of the additive closure
of a multiplicative submonoid `M`. -/
theorem coe_closure_eq (s : Set R) :
(closure s : Set R) = AddSubmonoid.closure (Submonoid.closure s : Set R) := by
simp [← Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid, Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_eq_closure]
#align subsemiring.coe_closure_eq Subsemiring.coe_closure_eq
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : Set R} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ x ∈ AddSubmonoid.closure (Submonoid.closure s : Set R) :=
Set.ext_iff.mp (coe_closure_eq s) x
#align subsemiring.mem_closure_iff Subsemiring.mem_closure_iff
@[simp]
theorem closure_addSubmonoid_closure {s : Set R} :
closure ↑(AddSubmonoid.closure s) = closure s := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => closure_mono AddSubmonoid.subset_closure hx⟩
rintro - ⟨H, rfl⟩
rintro - ⟨J, rfl⟩
refine (AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp (mem_closure_iff.mp hx)) H.toAddSubmonoid fun y hy => ?_
refine (Submonoid.mem_closure.mp hy) H.toSubmonoid fun z hz => ?_
exact (AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp hz) H.toAddSubmonoid fun w hw => J hw
#align subsemiring.closure_add_submonoid_closure Subsemiring.closure_addSubmonoid_closure
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `0`, `1`, and all elements
of `s`, and is preserved under addition and multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements
of the closure of `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {s : Set R} {p : R → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure s) (mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(zero : p 0) (one : p 1) (add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨p, @mul⟩, one⟩, @add, zero⟩).2 mem h
#align subsemiring.closure_induction Subsemiring.closure_induction
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction' {s : Set R} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_closure h))
(zero : p 0 (zero_mem _)) (one : p 1 (one_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy))
(mul : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
{a : R} (ha : a ∈ closure s) : p a ha := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (ha : a ∈ closure s) (hc : p a ha) => hc
refine
closure_induction ha (fun m hm => ⟨subset_closure hm, mem m hm⟩) ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
⟨one_mem _, one⟩ ?_ ?_
· exact (fun x y hx hy => hx.elim fun hx' hx => hy.elim fun hy' hy =>
⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
· exact (fun x y hx hy => hx.elim fun hx' hx => hy.elim fun hy' hy =>
⟨mul_mem hx' hy', mul _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction₂ {s : Set R} {p : R → R → Prop} {x} {y : R} (hx : x ∈ closure s)
(hy : y ∈ closure s) (Hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, p x y) (H0_left : ∀ x, p 0 x)
(H0_right : ∀ x, p x 0) (H1_left : ∀ x, p 1 x) (H1_right : ∀ x, p x 1)
(Hadd_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ + x₂) y)
(Hadd_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ + y₂))
(Hmul_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ * x₂) y)
(Hmul_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ * y₂)) : p x y :=
closure_induction hx
(fun x₁ x₁s =>
closure_induction hy (Hs x₁ x₁s) (H0_right x₁) (H1_right x₁) (Hadd_right x₁) (Hmul_right x₁))
(H0_left y) (H1_left y) (fun z z' => Hadd_left z z' y) fun z z' => Hmul_left z z' y
#align subsemiring.closure_induction₂ Subsemiring.closure_induction₂
theorem mem_closure_iff_exists_list {R} [Semiring R] {s : Set R} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ L : List (List R), (∀ t ∈ L, ∀ y ∈ t, y ∈ s) ∧ (L.map List.prod).sum = x := by
constructor
· intro hx
-- Porting note: needed explicit `p`
let p : R → Prop := fun x =>
∃ (L : List (List R)),
(∀ (t : List R), t ∈ L → ∀ (y : R), y ∈ t → y ∈ s) ∧ (List.map List.prod L).sum = x
exact AddSubmonoid.closure_induction (p := p) (mem_closure_iff.1 hx)
(fun x hx =>
suffices ∃ t : List R, (∀ y ∈ t, y ∈ s) ∧ t.prod = x from
let ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := this
⟨[t], List.forall_mem_singleton.2 ht1, by
rw [List.map_singleton, List.sum_singleton, ht2]⟩
Submonoid.closure_induction hx
(fun x hx => ⟨[x], List.forall_mem_singleton.2 hx, one_mul x⟩)
⟨[], List.forall_mem_nil _, rfl⟩ fun x y ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ ⟨u, hu1, hu2⟩ =>
⟨t ++ u, List.forall_mem_append.2 ⟨ht1, hu1⟩, by rw [List.prod_append, ht2, hu2]⟩)
⟨[], List.forall_mem_nil _, rfl⟩ fun x y ⟨L, HL1, HL2⟩ ⟨M, HM1, HM2⟩ =>
⟨L ++ M, List.forall_mem_append.2 ⟨HL1, HM1⟩, by
rw [List.map_append, List.sum_append, HL2, HM2]⟩
· rintro ⟨L, HL1, HL2⟩
exact HL2 ▸
list_sum_mem fun r hr =>
let ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := List.mem_map.1 hr
ht2 ▸ list_prod_mem _ fun y hy => subset_closure <| HL1 t ht1 y hy
#align subsemiring.mem_closure_iff_exists_list Subsemiring.mem_closure_iff_exists_list
variable (R)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure R _) (↑) where
choice s _ := closure s
gc _ _ := closure_le
le_l_u _ := subset_closure
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
#align subsemiring.gi Subsemiring.gi
variable {R}
/-- Closure of a subsemiring `S` equals `S`. -/
theorem closure_eq (s : Subsemiring R) : closure (s : Set R) = s :=
(Subsemiring.gi R).l_u_eq s
#align subsemiring.closure_eq Subsemiring.closure_eq
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set R) = ⊥ :=
(Subsemiring.gi R).gc.l_bot
#align subsemiring.closure_empty Subsemiring.closure_empty
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure (Set.univ : Set R) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top R _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
#align subsemiring.closure_univ Subsemiring.closure_univ
theorem closure_union (s t : Set R) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(Subsemiring.gi R).gc.l_sup
#align subsemiring.closure_union Subsemiring.closure_union
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set R) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(Subsemiring.gi R).gc.l_iSup
#align subsemiring.closure_Union Subsemiring.closure_iUnion
theorem closure_sUnion (s : Set (Set R)) : closure (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, closure t :=
(Subsemiring.gi R).gc.l_sSup
#align subsemiring.closure_sUnion Subsemiring.closure_sUnion
theorem map_sup (s t : Subsemiring R) (f : R →+* S) : (s ⊔ t).map f = s.map f ⊔ t.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
#align subsemiring.map_sup Subsemiring.map_sup
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : R →+* S) (s : ι → Subsemiring R) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
#align subsemiring.map_supr Subsemiring.map_iSup
theorem comap_inf (s t : Subsemiring S) (f : R →+* S) : (s ⊓ t).comap f = s.comap f ⊓ t.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
#align subsemiring.comap_inf Subsemiring.comap_inf
theorem comap_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : R →+* S) (s : ι → Subsemiring S) :
(iInf s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_iInf
#align subsemiring.comap_infi Subsemiring.comap_iInf
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : R →+* S) : (⊥ : Subsemiring R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align subsemiring.map_bot Subsemiring.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem comap_top (f : R →+* S) : (⊤ : Subsemiring S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
#align subsemiring.comap_top Subsemiring.comap_top
/-- Given `Subsemiring`s `s`, `t` of semirings `R`, `S` respectively, `s.prod t` is `s × t`
as a subsemiring of `R × S`. -/
def prod (s : Subsemiring R) (t : Subsemiring S) : Subsemiring (R × S) :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.prod t.toSubmonoid, s.toAddSubmonoid.prod t.toAddSubmonoid with
carrier := s ×ˢ t }
#align subsemiring.prod Subsemiring.prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Subsemiring R) (t : Subsemiring S) :
(s.prod t : Set (R × S)) = (s : Set R) ×ˢ (t : Set S) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_prod Subsemiring.coe_prod
theorem mem_prod {s : Subsemiring R} {t : Subsemiring S} {p : R × S} :
p ∈ s.prod t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_prod Subsemiring.mem_prod
@[mono]
theorem prod_mono ⦃s₁ s₂ : Subsemiring R⦄ (hs : s₁ ≤ s₂) ⦃t₁ t₂ : Subsemiring S⦄ (ht : t₁ ≤ t₂) :
s₁.prod t₁ ≤ s₂.prod t₂ :=
Set.prod_mono hs ht
#align subsemiring.prod_mono Subsemiring.prod_mono
theorem prod_mono_right (s : Subsemiring R) : Monotone fun t : Subsemiring S => s.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl s)
#align subsemiring.prod_mono_right Subsemiring.prod_mono_right
theorem prod_mono_left (t : Subsemiring S) : Monotone fun s : Subsemiring R => s.prod t :=
fun _ _ hs => prod_mono hs (le_refl t)
#align subsemiring.prod_mono_left Subsemiring.prod_mono_left
theorem prod_top (s : Subsemiring R) : s.prod (⊤ : Subsemiring S) = s.comap (RingHom.fst R S) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
#align subsemiring.prod_top Subsemiring.prod_top
theorem top_prod (s : Subsemiring S) : (⊤ : Subsemiring R).prod s = s.comap (RingHom.snd R S) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
#align subsemiring.top_prod Subsemiring.top_prod
@[simp]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subsemiring R).prod (⊤ : Subsemiring S) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
#align subsemiring.top_prod_top Subsemiring.top_prod_top
/-- Product of subsemirings is isomorphic to their product as monoids. -/
def prodEquiv (s : Subsemiring R) (t : Subsemiring S) : s.prod t ≃+* s × t :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (s : Set R) (t : Set S) with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align subsemiring.prod_equiv Subsemiring.prodEquiv
theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {S : ι → Subsemiring R} (hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S)
{x : R} : (x ∈ ⨆ i, S i) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ le_iSup S i hi⟩
let U : Subsemiring R :=
Subsemiring.mk' (⋃ i, (S i : Set R))
(⨆ i, (S i).toSubmonoid) (Submonoid.coe_iSup_of_directed hS)
(⨆ i, (S i).toAddSubmonoid) (AddSubmonoid.coe_iSup_of_directed hS)
-- Porting note: gave the hypothesis an explicit name because `@this` doesn't work
suffices h : ⨆ i, S i ≤ U by simpa [U] using @h x
exact iSup_le fun i x hx ↦ Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hx⟩
#align subsemiring.mem_supr_of_directed Subsemiring.mem_iSup_of_directed
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {S : ι → Subsemiring R}
(hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) : ((⨆ i, S i : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = ⋃ i, S i :=
Set.ext fun x ↦ by simp [mem_iSup_of_directed hS]
#align subsemiring.coe_supr_of_directed Subsemiring.coe_iSup_of_directed
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Subsemiring/Basic.lean | 1,064 | 1,068 | theorem mem_sSup_of_directedOn {S : Set (Subsemiring R)} (Sne : S.Nonempty)
(hS : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S) {x : R} : x ∈ sSup S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, x ∈ s := by |
haveI : Nonempty S := Sne.to_subtype
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup', mem_iSup_of_directed hS.directed_val, SetCoe.exists, Subtype.coe_mk,
exists_prop]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import topology.uniform_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"195fcd60ff2bfe392543bceb0ec2adcdb472db4c"
/-!
# Uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups. Many concepts directly
generalize to uniform spaces, e.g.
* uniform continuity (in this file)
* completeness (in `Cauchy.lean`)
* extension of uniform continuous functions to complete spaces (in `UniformEmbedding.lean`)
* totally bounded sets (in `Cauchy.lean`)
* totally bounded complete sets are compact (in `Cauchy.lean`)
A uniform structure on a type `X` is a filter `𝓤 X` on `X × X` satisfying some conditions
which makes it reasonable to say that `∀ᶠ (p : X × X) in 𝓤 X, ...` means
"for all p.1 and p.2 in X close enough, ...". Elements of this filter are called entourages
of `X`. The two main examples are:
* If `X` is a metric space, `V ∈ 𝓤 X ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ⊆ V`
* If `G` is an additive topological group, `V ∈ 𝓤 G ↔ ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G), {p | p.2 - p.1 ∈ U} ⊆ V`
Those examples are generalizations in two different directions of the elementary example where
`X = ℝ` and `V ∈ 𝓤 ℝ ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | |p.2 - p.1| < ε } ⊆ V` which features both the topological
group structure on `ℝ` and its metric space structure.
Each uniform structure on `X` induces a topology on `X` characterized by
> `nhds_eq_comap_uniformity : ∀ {x : X}, 𝓝 x = comap (Prod.mk x) (𝓤 X)`
where `Prod.mk x : X → X × X := (fun y ↦ (x, y))` is the partial evaluation of the product
constructor.
The dictionary with metric spaces includes:
* an upper bound for `dist x y` translates into `(x, y) ∈ V` for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`
* a ball `ball x r` roughly corresponds to `UniformSpace.ball x V := {y | (x, y) ∈ V}`
for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`, but the later is more general (it includes in
particular both open and closed balls for suitable `V`).
In particular we have:
`isOpen_iff_ball_subset {s : Set X} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ball x V ⊆ s`
The triangle inequality is abstracted to a statement involving the composition of relations in `X`.
First note that the triangle inequality in a metric space is equivalent to
`∀ (x y z : X) (r r' : ℝ), dist x y ≤ r → dist y z ≤ r' → dist x z ≤ r + r'`.
Then, for any `V` and `W` with type `Set (X × X)`, the composition `V ○ W : Set (X × X)` is
defined as `{ p : X × X | ∃ z, (p.1, z) ∈ V ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ W }`.
In the metric space case, if `V = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r }` and `W = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r' }`
then the triangle inequality, as reformulated above, says `V ○ W` is contained in
`{p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r + r'}` which is the entourage associated to the radius `r + r'`.
In general we have `mem_ball_comp (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) : z ∈ ball x (V ○ W)`.
Note that this discussion does not depend on any axiom imposed on the uniformity filter,
it is simply captured by the definition of composition.
The uniform space axioms ask the filter `𝓤 X` to satisfy the following:
* every `V ∈ 𝓤 X` contains the diagonal `idRel = { p | p.1 = p.2 }`. This abstracts the fact
that `dist x x ≤ r` for every non-negative radius `r` in the metric space case and also that
`x - x` belongs to every neighborhood of zero in the topological group case.
* `V ∈ 𝓤 X → Prod.swap '' V ∈ 𝓤 X`. This is tightly related the fact that `dist x y = dist y x`
in a metric space, and to continuity of negation in the topological group case.
* `∀ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ∃ W ∈ 𝓤 X, W ○ W ⊆ V`. In the metric space case, it corresponds
to cutting the radius of a ball in half and applying the triangle inequality.
In the topological group case, it comes from continuity of addition at `(0, 0)`.
These three axioms are stated more abstractly in the definition below, in terms of
operations on filters, without directly manipulating entourages.
## Main definitions
* `UniformSpace X` is a uniform space structure on a type `X`
* `UniformContinuous f` is a predicate saying a function `f : α → β` between uniform spaces
is uniformly continuous : `∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ (x : α × α) in 𝓤 α, (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r`
In this file we also define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## Implementation notes
There is already a theory of relations in `Data/Rel.lean` where the main definition is
`def Rel (α β : Type*) := α → β → Prop`.
The relations used in the current file involve only one type, but this is not the reason why
we don't reuse `Data/Rel.lean`. We use `Set (α × α)`
instead of `Rel α α` because we really need sets to use the filter library, and elements
of filters on `α × α` have type `Set (α × α)`.
The structure `UniformSpace X` bundles a uniform structure on `X`, a topology on `X` and
an assumption saying those are compatible. This may not seem mathematically reasonable at first,
but is in fact an instance of the forgetful inheritance pattern. See Note [forgetful inheritance]
below.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
/-- The identity relation, or the graph of the identity function -/
def idRel {α : Type*} :=
{ p : α × α | p.1 = p.2 }
#align id_rel idRel
@[simp]
theorem mem_idRel {a b : α} : (a, b) ∈ @idRel α ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_id_rel mem_idRel
@[simp]
theorem idRel_subset {s : Set (α × α)} : idRel ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a, (a, a) ∈ s := by
simp [subset_def]
#align id_rel_subset idRel_subset
/-- The composition of relations -/
def compRel (r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)) :=
{ p : α × α | ∃ z : α, (p.1, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ r₂ }
#align comp_rel compRel
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Uniformity] infixl:62 " ○ " => compRel
open Uniformity
@[simp]
theorem mem_compRel {α : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)} {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ r₁ ○ r₂ ↔ ∃ z, (x, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, y) ∈ r₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_comp_rel mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem swap_idRel : Prod.swap '' idRel = @idRel α :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simpa [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap] using eq_comm
#align swap_id_rel swap_idRel
theorem Monotone.compRel [Preorder β] {f g : β → Set (α × α)} (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ○ g x := fun _ _ h _ ⟨z, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨z, hf h h₁, hg h h₂⟩
#align monotone.comp_rel Monotone.compRel
@[mono]
theorem compRel_mono {f g h k : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : f ⊆ h) (h₂ : g ⊆ k) : f ○ g ⊆ h ○ k :=
fun _ ⟨z, h, h'⟩ => ⟨z, h₁ h, h₂ h'⟩
#align comp_rel_mono compRel_mono
theorem prod_mk_mem_compRel {a b c : α} {s t : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : (a, c) ∈ s) (h₂ : (c, b) ∈ t) :
(a, b) ∈ s ○ t :=
⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩
#align prod_mk_mem_comp_rel prod_mk_mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem id_compRel {r : Set (α × α)} : idRel ○ r = r :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp
#align id_comp_rel id_compRel
theorem compRel_assoc {r s t : Set (α × α)} : r ○ s ○ t = r ○ (s ○ t) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩; simp only [mem_compRel]; tauto
#align comp_rel_assoc compRel_assoc
theorem left_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ t) : s ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨_x, y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨y, xy_in, h <| rfl⟩
#align left_subset_comp_rel left_subset_compRel
theorem right_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : t ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨x, _y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨x, h <| rfl, xy_in⟩
#align right_subset_comp_rel right_subset_compRel
theorem subset_comp_self {s : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
left_subset_compRel h
#align subset_comp_self subset_comp_self
theorem subset_iterate_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) (n : ℕ) :
t ⊆ (s ○ ·)^[n] t := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing t
exacts [Subset.rfl, (right_subset_compRel h).trans ihn]
#align subset_iterate_comp_rel subset_iterate_compRel
/-- The relation is invariant under swapping factors. -/
def SymmetricRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Prop :=
Prod.swap ⁻¹' V = V
#align symmetric_rel SymmetricRel
/-- The maximal symmetric relation contained in a given relation. -/
def symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Set (α × α) :=
V ∩ Prod.swap ⁻¹' V
#align symmetrize_rel symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetric_symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : SymmetricRel (symmetrizeRel V) := by
simp [SymmetricRel, symmetrizeRel, preimage_inter, inter_comm, ← preimage_comp]
#align symmetric_symmetrize_rel symmetric_symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetrizeRel_subset_self (V : Set (α × α)) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ V :=
sep_subset _ _
#align symmetrize_rel_subset_self symmetrizeRel_subset_self
@[mono]
theorem symmetrize_mono {V W : Set (α × α)} (h : V ⊆ W) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ symmetrizeRel W :=
inter_subset_inter h <| preimage_mono h
#align symmetrize_mono symmetrize_mono
theorem SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ V ↔ (y, x) ∈ V :=
Set.ext_iff.1 hV (y, x)
#align symmetric_rel.mk_mem_comm SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm
theorem SymmetricRel.eq {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' U = U :=
hU
#align symmetric_rel.eq SymmetricRel.eq
theorem SymmetricRel.inter {U V : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) (hV : SymmetricRel V) :
SymmetricRel (U ∩ V) := by rw [SymmetricRel, preimage_inter, hU.eq, hV.eq]
#align symmetric_rel.inter SymmetricRel.inter
/-- This core description of a uniform space is outside of the type class hierarchy. It is useful
for constructions of uniform spaces, when the topology is derived from the uniform space. -/
structure UniformSpace.Core (α : Type u) where
/-- The uniformity filter. Once `UniformSpace` is defined, `𝓤 α` (`_root_.uniformity`) becomes the
normal form. -/
uniformity : Filter (α × α)
/-- Every set in the uniformity filter includes the diagonal. -/
refl : 𝓟 idRel ≤ uniformity
/-- If `s ∈ uniformity`, then `Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ∈ uniformity`. -/
symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
/-- For every set `u ∈ uniformity`, there exists `v ∈ uniformity` such that `v ○ v ⊆ u`. -/
comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
#align uniform_space.core UniformSpace.Core
protected theorem UniformSpace.Core.comp_mem_uniformity_sets {c : Core α} {s : Set (α × α)}
(hs : s ∈ c.uniformity) : ∃ t ∈ c.uniformity, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
(mem_lift'_sets <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).mp <| c.comp hs
/-- An alternative constructor for `UniformSpace.Core`. This version unfolds various
`Filter`-related definitions. -/
def UniformSpace.Core.mk' {α : Type u} (U : Filter (α × α)) (refl : ∀ r ∈ U, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r)
(symm : ∀ r ∈ U, Prod.swap ⁻¹' r ∈ U) (comp : ∀ r ∈ U, ∃ t ∈ U, t ○ t ⊆ r) :
UniformSpace.Core α :=
⟨U, fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 (refl _ ru), symm, fun _r ru =>
let ⟨_s, hs, hsr⟩ := comp _ ru
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) hsr⟩
#align uniform_space.core.mk' UniformSpace.Core.mk'
/-- Defining a `UniformSpace.Core` from a filter basis satisfying some uniformity-like axioms. -/
def UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis {α : Type u} (B : FilterBasis (α × α))
(refl : ∀ r ∈ B, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r) (symm : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ Prod.swap ⁻¹' r)
(comp : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ○ t ⊆ r) : UniformSpace.Core α where
uniformity := B.filter
refl := B.hasBasis.ge_iff.mpr fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 <| refl _ ru
symm := (B.hasBasis.tendsto_iff B.hasBasis).mpr symm
comp := (HasBasis.le_basis_iff (B.hasBasis.lift' (monotone_id.compRel monotone_id))
B.hasBasis).2 comp
#align uniform_space.core.mk_of_basis UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis
/-- A uniform space generates a topological space -/
def UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) :
TopologicalSpace α :=
.mkOfNhds fun x ↦ .comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity
#align uniform_space.core.to_topological_space UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace
theorem UniformSpace.Core.ext :
∀ {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace.Core α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align uniform_space.core_eq UniformSpace.Core.ext
theorem UniformSpace.Core.nhds_toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : Core α) (x : α) :
@nhds α u.toTopologicalSpace x = comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity := by
apply TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun _ ↦ (basis_sets _).comap _)
· exact fun a U hU ↦ u.refl hU rfl
· intro a U hU
rcases u.comp_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with b hb
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with c hc
exact hVU ⟨b, hb, hc⟩
-- the topological structure is embedded in the uniform structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- A uniform space is a generalization of the "uniform" topological aspects of a
metric space. It consists of a filter on `α × α` called the "uniformity", which
satisfies properties analogous to the reflexivity, symmetry, and triangle properties
of a metric.
A metric space has a natural uniformity, and a uniform space has a natural topology.
A topological group also has a natural uniformity, even when it is not metrizable. -/
class UniformSpace (α : Type u) extends TopologicalSpace α where
/-- The uniformity filter. -/
protected uniformity : Filter (α × α)
/-- If `s ∈ uniformity`, then `Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ∈ uniformity`. -/
protected symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
/-- For every set `u ∈ uniformity`, there exists `v ∈ uniformity` such that `v ○ v ⊆ u`. -/
protected comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
/-- The uniformity agrees with the topology: the neighborhoods filter of each point `x`
is equal to `Filter.comap (Prod.mk x) (𝓤 α)`. -/
protected nhds_eq_comap_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 x = comap (Prod.mk x) uniformity
#align uniform_space UniformSpace
#noalign uniform_space.mk' -- Can't be a `match_pattern`, so not useful anymore
/-- The uniformity is a filter on α × α (inferred from an ambient uniform space
structure on α). -/
def uniformity (α : Type u) [UniformSpace α] : Filter (α × α) :=
@UniformSpace.uniformity α _
#align uniformity uniformity
/-- Notation for the uniformity filter with respect to a non-standard `UniformSpace` instance. -/
scoped[Uniformity] notation "𝓤[" u "]" => @uniformity _ u
@[inherit_doc] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: should we drop the `uniformity` def?
scoped[Uniformity] notation "𝓤" => uniformity
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace` from a `u : UniformSpace.Core` and a `TopologicalSpace` structure
that is equal to `u.toTopologicalSpace`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.ofCoreEq {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) (t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : t = u.toTopologicalSpace) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
toTopologicalSpace := t
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by rw [h, u.nhds_toTopologicalSpace]
#align uniform_space.of_core_eq UniformSpace.ofCoreEq
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace` from a `UniformSpace.Core`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.ofCore {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofCoreEq u _ rfl
#align uniform_space.of_core UniformSpace.ofCore
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace.Core` from a `UniformSpace`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.toCore (u : UniformSpace α) : UniformSpace.Core α where
__ := u
refl := by
rintro U hU ⟨x, y⟩ (rfl : x = y)
have : Prod.mk x ⁻¹' U ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [UniformSpace.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact preimage_mem_comap hU
convert mem_of_mem_nhds this
theorem UniformSpace.toCore_toTopologicalSpace (u : UniformSpace α) :
u.toCore.toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by
rw [u.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, u.toCore.nhds_toTopologicalSpace]
#align uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space UniformSpace.toCore_toTopologicalSpace
/-- Build a `UniformSpace` from a `UniformSpace.Core` and a compatible topology.
Use `UniformSpace.mk` instead to avoid proving
the unnecessary assumption `UniformSpace.Core.refl`.
The main constructor used to use a different compatibility assumption.
This definition was created as a step towards porting to a new definition.
Now the main definition is ported,
so this constructor will be removed in a few months. -/
@[deprecated UniformSpace.mk (since := "2024-03-20")]
def UniformSpace.ofNhdsEqComap (u : UniformSpace.Core α) (_t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : ∀ x, 𝓝 x = u.uniformity.comap (Prod.mk x)) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := h
@[ext]
protected theorem UniformSpace.ext {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u₁] = 𝓤[u₂]) : u₁ = u₂ := by
have : u₁.toTopologicalSpace = u₂.toTopologicalSpace := TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
rw [u₁.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, u₂.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact congr_arg (comap _) h
cases u₁; cases u₂; congr
#align uniform_space_eq UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.ext_iff {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} :
u₁ = u₂ ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤[u₁] ↔ s ∈ 𝓤[u₂] :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore (u : UniformSpace α) (t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : t = u.toCore.toTopologicalSpace) : .ofCoreEq u.toCore t h = u :=
UniformSpace.ext rfl
#align uniform_space.of_core_eq_to_core UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore
/-- Replace topology in a `UniformSpace` instance with a propositionally (but possibly not
definitionally) equal one. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.replaceTopology {α : Type*} [i : TopologicalSpace α] (u : UniformSpace α)
(h : i = u.toTopologicalSpace) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
toTopologicalSpace := i
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by rw [h, u.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
#align uniform_space.replace_topology UniformSpace.replaceTopology
theorem UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq {α : Type*} [i : TopologicalSpace α] (u : UniformSpace α)
(h : i = u.toTopologicalSpace) : u.replaceTopology h = u :=
UniformSpace.ext rfl
#align uniform_space.replace_topology_eq UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq
-- Porting note: rfc: use `UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis`? This will change defeq here and there
/-- Define a `UniformSpace` using a "distance" function. The function can be, e.g., the
distance in a (usual or extended) metric space or an absolute value on a ring. -/
def UniformSpace.ofFun {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [OrderedAddCommMonoid β]
(d : α → α → β) (refl : ∀ x, d x x = 0) (symm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x)
(triangle : ∀ x y z, d x z ≤ d x y + d y z)
(half : ∀ ε > (0 : β), ∃ δ > (0 : β), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε) :
UniformSpace α :=
.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ r > 0, 𝓟 { x | d x.1 x.2 < r }
refl := le_iInf₂ fun r hr => principal_mono.2 <| idRel_subset.2 fun x => by simpa [refl]
symm := tendsto_iInf_iInf fun r => tendsto_iInf_iInf fun _ => tendsto_principal_principal.2
fun x hx => by rwa [mem_setOf, symm]
comp := le_iInf₂ fun r hr => let ⟨δ, h0, hδr⟩ := half r hr; le_principal_iff.2 <|
mem_of_superset
(mem_lift' <| mem_iInf_of_mem δ <| mem_iInf_of_mem h0 <| mem_principal_self _)
fun (x, z) ⟨y, h₁, h₂⟩ => (triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (hδr _ h₁ _ h₂) }
#align uniform_space.of_fun UniformSpace.ofFun
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid β]
(h₀ : ∃ x : β, 0 < x) (d : α → α → β) (refl : ∀ x, d x x = 0) (symm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x)
(triangle : ∀ x y z, d x z ≤ d x y + d y z)
(half : ∀ ε > (0 : β), ∃ δ > (0 : β), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε) :
𝓤[.ofFun d refl symm triangle half].HasBasis ((0 : β) < ·) (fun ε => { x | d x.1 x.2 < ε }) :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun ε₁ h₁ ε₂ h₂ => ⟨min ε₁ ε₂, lt_min h₁ h₂, fun _x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx (min_le_left _ _),
fun _x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx (min_le_right _ _)⟩) h₀
#align uniform_space.has_basis_of_fun UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem nhds_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap (Prod.mk x) :=
UniformSpace.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x
#align nhds_eq_comap_uniformity nhds_eq_comap_uniformity
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 448 | 450 | theorem isOpen_uniformity {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by |
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap_prod_mk]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Prod
#align_import order.filter.n_ary from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"78f647f8517f021d839a7553d5dc97e79b508dea"
/-!
# N-ary maps of filter
This file defines the binary and ternary maps of filters. This is mostly useful to define pointwise
operations on filters.
## Main declarations
* `Filter.map₂`: Binary map of filters.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Data.Finset.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
-/
open Function Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' : Type*} {m : α → β → γ} {f f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
{g g₁ g₂ : Filter β} {h h₁ h₂ : Filter γ} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {u : Set γ}
{v : Set δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `m : α → β → γ` as a function `Filter α → Filter β → Filter γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def map₂ (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : Filter γ :=
((f ×ˢ g).map (uncurry m)).copy { s | ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ v ∈ g, image2 m u v ⊆ s } fun _ ↦ by
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff, image2_subset_iff, prod_subset_iff]; rfl
#align filter.map₂ Filter.map₂
@[simp 900]
theorem mem_map₂_iff : u ∈ map₂ m f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, image2 m s t ⊆ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map₂_iff Filter.mem_map₂_iff
theorem image2_mem_map₂ (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : image2 m s t ∈ map₂ m f g :=
⟨_, hs, _, ht, Subset.rfl⟩
#align filter.image2_mem_map₂ Filter.image2_mem_map₂
theorem map_prod_eq_map₂ (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.map (fun p : α × β => m p.1 p.2) (f ×ˢ g) = map₂ m f g := by
rw [map₂, copy_eq, uncurry_def]
#align filter.map_prod_eq_map₂ Filter.map_prod_eq_map₂
theorem map_prod_eq_map₂' (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.map m (f ×ˢ g) = map₂ (fun a b => m (a, b)) f g :=
map_prod_eq_map₂ (curry m) f g
#align filter.map_prod_eq_map₂' Filter.map_prod_eq_map₂'
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk_eq_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : map₂ Prod.mk f g = f ×ˢ g := by
simp only [← map_prod_eq_map₂, map_id']
#align filter.map₂_mk_eq_prod Filter.map₂_mk_eq_prod
-- lemma image2_mem_map₂_iff (hm : injective2 m) : image2 m s t ∈ map₂ m f g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
-- ⟨by { rintro ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h⟩, rw image2_subset_image2_iff hm at h,
-- exact ⟨mem_of_superset hu h.1, mem_of_superset hv h.2⟩ }, λ h, image2_mem_map₂ h.1 h.2⟩
theorem map₂_mono (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) : map₂ m f₁ g₁ ≤ map₂ m f₂ g₂ :=
fun _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ => ⟨s, hf hs, t, hg ht, hst⟩
#align filter.map₂_mono Filter.map₂_mono
theorem map₂_mono_left (h : g₁ ≤ g₂) : map₂ m f g₁ ≤ map₂ m f g₂ :=
map₂_mono Subset.rfl h
#align filter.map₂_mono_left Filter.map₂_mono_left
theorem map₂_mono_right (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : map₂ m f₁ g ≤ map₂ m f₂ g :=
map₂_mono h Subset.rfl
#align filter.map₂_mono_right Filter.map₂_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem le_map₂_iff {h : Filter γ} :
h ≤ map₂ m f g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → image2 m s t ∈ h :=
⟨fun H _ hs _ ht => H <| image2_mem_map₂ hs ht, fun H _ ⟨_, hs, _, ht, hu⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (H hs ht) hu⟩
#align filter.le_map₂_iff Filter.le_map₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem map₂_eq_bot_iff : map₂ m f g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by simp [← map_prod_eq_map₂]
#align filter.map₂_eq_bot_iff Filter.map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem map₂_bot_left : map₂ m ⊥ g = ⊥ := map₂_eq_bot_iff.2 <| .inl rfl
#align filter.map₂_bot_left Filter.map₂_bot_left
@[simp]
theorem map₂_bot_right : map₂ m f ⊥ = ⊥ := map₂_eq_bot_iff.2 <| .inr rfl
#align filter.map₂_bot_right Filter.map₂_bot_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/NAry.lean | 103 | 103 | theorem map₂_neBot_iff : (map₂ m f g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot := by | simp [neBot_iff, not_or]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Fintype
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import group_theory.sylow from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4be589053caf347b899a494da75410deb55fb3ef"
/-!
# Sylow theorems
The Sylow theorems are the following results for every finite group `G` and every prime number `p`.
* There exists a Sylow `p`-subgroup of `G`.
* All Sylow `p`-subgroups of `G` are conjugate to each other.
* Let `nₚ` be the number of Sylow `p`-subgroups of `G`, then `nₚ` divides the index of the Sylow
`p`-subgroup, `nₚ ≡ 1 [MOD p]`, and `nₚ` is equal to the index of the normalizer of the Sylow
`p`-subgroup in `G`.
## Main definitions
* `Sylow p G` : The type of Sylow `p`-subgroups of `G`.
## Main statements
* `exists_subgroup_card_pow_prime`: A generalization of Sylow's first theorem:
For every prime power `pⁿ` dividing the cardinality of `G`,
there exists a subgroup of `G` of order `pⁿ`.
* `IsPGroup.exists_le_sylow`: A generalization of Sylow's first theorem:
Every `p`-subgroup is contained in a Sylow `p`-subgroup.
* `Sylow.card_eq_multiplicity`: The cardinality of a Sylow subgroup is `p ^ n`
where `n` is the multiplicity of `p` in the group order.
* `sylow_conjugate`: A generalization of Sylow's second theorem:
If the number of Sylow `p`-subgroups is finite, then all Sylow `p`-subgroups are conjugate.
* `card_sylow_modEq_one`: A generalization of Sylow's third theorem:
If the number of Sylow `p`-subgroups is finite, then it is congruent to `1` modulo `p`.
-/
open Fintype MulAction Subgroup
section InfiniteSylow
variable (p : ℕ) (G : Type*) [Group G]
/-- A Sylow `p`-subgroup is a maximal `p`-subgroup. -/
structure Sylow extends Subgroup G where
isPGroup' : IsPGroup p toSubgroup
is_maximal' : ∀ {Q : Subgroup G}, IsPGroup p Q → toSubgroup ≤ Q → Q = toSubgroup
#align sylow Sylow
variable {p} {G}
namespace Sylow
attribute [coe] Sylow.toSubgroup
-- Porting note: Changed to `CoeOut`
instance : CoeOut (Sylow p G) (Subgroup G) :=
⟨Sylow.toSubgroup⟩
-- Porting note: syntactic tautology
-- @[simp]
-- theorem toSubgroup_eq_coe {P : Sylow p G} : P.toSubgroup = ↑P :=
-- rfl
#noalign sylow.to_subgroup_eq_coe
@[ext]
theorem ext {P Q : Sylow p G} (h : (P : Subgroup G) = Q) : P = Q := by cases P; cases Q; congr
#align sylow.ext Sylow.ext
theorem ext_iff {P Q : Sylow p G} : P = Q ↔ (P : Subgroup G) = Q :=
⟨congr_arg _, ext⟩
#align sylow.ext_iff Sylow.ext_iff
instance : SetLike (Sylow p G) G where
coe := (↑)
coe_injective' _ _ h := ext (SetLike.coe_injective h)
instance : SubgroupClass (Sylow p G) G where
mul_mem := Subgroup.mul_mem _
one_mem _ := Subgroup.one_mem _
inv_mem := Subgroup.inv_mem _
variable (P : Sylow p G)
/-- The action by a Sylow subgroup is the action by the underlying group. -/
instance mulActionLeft {α : Type*} [MulAction G α] : MulAction P α :=
inferInstanceAs (MulAction (P : Subgroup G) α)
#align sylow.mul_action_left Sylow.mulActionLeft
variable {K : Type*} [Group K] (ϕ : K →* G) {N : Subgroup G}
/-- The preimage of a Sylow subgroup under a p-group-kernel homomorphism is a Sylow subgroup. -/
def comapOfKerIsPGroup (hϕ : IsPGroup p ϕ.ker) (h : ↑P ≤ ϕ.range) : Sylow p K :=
{ P.1.comap ϕ with
isPGroup' := P.2.comap_of_ker_isPGroup ϕ hϕ
is_maximal' := fun {Q} hQ hle => by
show Q = P.1.comap ϕ
rw [← P.3 (hQ.map ϕ) (le_trans (ge_of_eq (map_comap_eq_self h)) (map_mono hle))]
exact (comap_map_eq_self ((P.1.ker_le_comap ϕ).trans hle)).symm }
#align sylow.comap_of_ker_is_p_group Sylow.comapOfKerIsPGroup
@[simp]
theorem coe_comapOfKerIsPGroup (hϕ : IsPGroup p ϕ.ker) (h : ↑P ≤ ϕ.range) :
(P.comapOfKerIsPGroup ϕ hϕ h : Subgroup K) = Subgroup.comap ϕ ↑P :=
rfl
#align sylow.coe_comap_of_ker_is_p_group Sylow.coe_comapOfKerIsPGroup
/-- The preimage of a Sylow subgroup under an injective homomorphism is a Sylow subgroup. -/
def comapOfInjective (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) (h : ↑P ≤ ϕ.range) : Sylow p K :=
P.comapOfKerIsPGroup ϕ (IsPGroup.ker_isPGroup_of_injective hϕ) h
#align sylow.comap_of_injective Sylow.comapOfInjective
@[simp]
theorem coe_comapOfInjective (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) (h : ↑P ≤ ϕ.range) :
↑(P.comapOfInjective ϕ hϕ h) = Subgroup.comap ϕ ↑P :=
rfl
#align sylow.coe_comap_of_injective Sylow.coe_comapOfInjective
/-- A sylow subgroup of G is also a sylow subgroup of a subgroup of G. -/
protected def subtype (h : ↑P ≤ N) : Sylow p N :=
P.comapOfInjective N.subtype Subtype.coe_injective (by rwa [subtype_range])
#align sylow.subtype Sylow.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype (h : ↑P ≤ N) : ↑(P.subtype h) = subgroupOf (↑P) N :=
rfl
#align sylow.coe_subtype Sylow.coe_subtype
theorem subtype_injective {P Q : Sylow p G} {hP : ↑P ≤ N} {hQ : ↑Q ≤ N}
(h : P.subtype hP = Q.subtype hQ) : P = Q := by
rw [SetLike.ext_iff] at h ⊢
exact fun g => ⟨fun hg => (h ⟨g, hP hg⟩).mp hg, fun hg => (h ⟨g, hQ hg⟩).mpr hg⟩
#align sylow.subtype_injective Sylow.subtype_injective
end Sylow
/-- A generalization of **Sylow's first theorem**.
Every `p`-subgroup is contained in a Sylow `p`-subgroup. -/
theorem IsPGroup.exists_le_sylow {P : Subgroup G} (hP : IsPGroup p P) : ∃ Q : Sylow p G, P ≤ Q :=
Exists.elim
(zorn_nonempty_partialOrder₀ { Q : Subgroup G | IsPGroup p Q }
(fun c hc1 hc2 Q hQ =>
⟨{ carrier := ⋃ R : c, R
one_mem' := ⟨Q, ⟨⟨Q, hQ⟩, rfl⟩, Q.one_mem⟩
inv_mem' := fun {g} ⟨_, ⟨R, rfl⟩, hg⟩ => ⟨R, ⟨R, rfl⟩, R.1.inv_mem hg⟩
mul_mem' := fun {g} h ⟨_, ⟨R, rfl⟩, hg⟩ ⟨_, ⟨S, rfl⟩, hh⟩ =>
(hc2.total R.2 S.2).elim (fun T => ⟨S, ⟨S, rfl⟩, S.1.mul_mem (T hg) hh⟩) fun T =>
⟨R, ⟨R, rfl⟩, R.1.mul_mem hg (T hh)⟩ },
fun ⟨g, _, ⟨S, rfl⟩, hg⟩ => by
refine Exists.imp (fun k hk => ?_) (hc1 S.2 ⟨g, hg⟩)
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_pow] at hk ⊢, fun M hM g hg => ⟨M, ⟨⟨M, hM⟩, rfl⟩, hg⟩⟩)
P hP)
fun {Q} ⟨hQ1, hQ2, hQ3⟩ => ⟨⟨Q, hQ1, hQ3 _⟩, hQ2⟩
#align is_p_group.exists_le_sylow IsPGroup.exists_le_sylow
instance Sylow.nonempty : Nonempty (Sylow p G) :=
nonempty_of_exists IsPGroup.of_bot.exists_le_sylow
#align sylow.nonempty Sylow.nonempty
noncomputable instance Sylow.inhabited : Inhabited (Sylow p G) :=
Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty Sylow.nonempty
#align sylow.inhabited Sylow.inhabited
theorem Sylow.exists_comap_eq_of_ker_isPGroup {H : Type*} [Group H] (P : Sylow p H) {f : H →* G}
(hf : IsPGroup p f.ker) : ∃ Q : Sylow p G, (Q : Subgroup G).comap f = P :=
Exists.imp (fun Q hQ => P.3 (Q.2.comap_of_ker_isPGroup f hf) (map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hQ))
(P.2.map f).exists_le_sylow
#align sylow.exists_comap_eq_of_ker_is_p_group Sylow.exists_comap_eq_of_ker_isPGroup
theorem Sylow.exists_comap_eq_of_injective {H : Type*} [Group H] (P : Sylow p H) {f : H →* G}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : ∃ Q : Sylow p G, (Q : Subgroup G).comap f = P :=
P.exists_comap_eq_of_ker_isPGroup (IsPGroup.ker_isPGroup_of_injective hf)
#align sylow.exists_comap_eq_of_injective Sylow.exists_comap_eq_of_injective
theorem Sylow.exists_comap_subtype_eq {H : Subgroup G} (P : Sylow p H) :
∃ Q : Sylow p G, (Q : Subgroup G).comap H.subtype = P :=
P.exists_comap_eq_of_injective Subtype.coe_injective
#align sylow.exists_comap_subtype_eq Sylow.exists_comap_subtype_eq
/-- If the kernel of `f : H →* G` is a `p`-group,
then `Fintype (Sylow p G)` implies `Fintype (Sylow p H)`. -/
noncomputable def Sylow.fintypeOfKerIsPGroup {H : Type*} [Group H] {f : H →* G}
(hf : IsPGroup p f.ker) [Fintype (Sylow p G)] : Fintype (Sylow p H) :=
let h_exists := fun P : Sylow p H => P.exists_comap_eq_of_ker_isPGroup hf
let g : Sylow p H → Sylow p G := fun P => Classical.choose (h_exists P)
have hg : ∀ P : Sylow p H, (g P).1.comap f = P := fun P => Classical.choose_spec (h_exists P)
Fintype.ofInjective g fun P Q h => Sylow.ext (by rw [← hg, h]; exact (h_exists Q).choose_spec)
#align sylow.fintype_of_ker_is_p_group Sylow.fintypeOfKerIsPGroup
/-- If `f : H →* G` is injective, then `Fintype (Sylow p G)` implies `Fintype (Sylow p H)`. -/
noncomputable def Sylow.fintypeOfInjective {H : Type*} [Group H] {f : H →* G}
(hf : Function.Injective f) [Fintype (Sylow p G)] : Fintype (Sylow p H) :=
Sylow.fintypeOfKerIsPGroup (IsPGroup.ker_isPGroup_of_injective hf)
#align sylow.fintype_of_injective Sylow.fintypeOfInjective
/-- If `H` is a subgroup of `G`, then `Fintype (Sylow p G)` implies `Fintype (Sylow p H)`. -/
noncomputable instance (H : Subgroup G) [Fintype (Sylow p G)] : Fintype (Sylow p H) :=
Sylow.fintypeOfInjective H.subtype_injective
/-- If `H` is a subgroup of `G`, then `Finite (Sylow p G)` implies `Finite (Sylow p H)`. -/
instance (H : Subgroup G) [Finite (Sylow p G)] : Finite (Sylow p H) := by
cases nonempty_fintype (Sylow p G)
infer_instance
open Pointwise
/-- `Subgroup.pointwiseMulAction` preserves Sylow subgroups. -/
instance Sylow.pointwiseMulAction {α : Type*} [Group α] [MulDistribMulAction α G] :
MulAction α (Sylow p G) where
smul g P :=
⟨(g • P.toSubgroup : Subgroup G), P.2.map _, fun {Q} hQ hS =>
inv_smul_eq_iff.mp
(P.3 (hQ.map _) fun s hs =>
(congr_arg (· ∈ g⁻¹ • Q) (inv_smul_smul g s)).mp
(smul_mem_pointwise_smul (g • s) g⁻¹ Q (hS (smul_mem_pointwise_smul s g P hs))))⟩
one_smul P := Sylow.ext (one_smul α P.toSubgroup)
mul_smul g h P := Sylow.ext (mul_smul g h P.toSubgroup)
#align sylow.pointwise_mul_action Sylow.pointwiseMulAction
theorem Sylow.pointwise_smul_def {α : Type*} [Group α] [MulDistribMulAction α G] {g : α}
{P : Sylow p G} : ↑(g • P) = g • (P : Subgroup G) :=
rfl
#align sylow.pointwise_smul_def Sylow.pointwise_smul_def
instance Sylow.mulAction : MulAction G (Sylow p G) :=
compHom _ MulAut.conj
#align sylow.mul_action Sylow.mulAction
theorem Sylow.smul_def {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} : g • P = MulAut.conj g • P :=
rfl
#align sylow.smul_def Sylow.smul_def
theorem Sylow.coe_subgroup_smul {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} :
↑(g • P) = MulAut.conj g • (P : Subgroup G) :=
rfl
#align sylow.coe_subgroup_smul Sylow.coe_subgroup_smul
theorem Sylow.coe_smul {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} : ↑(g • P) = MulAut.conj g • (P : Set G) :=
rfl
#align sylow.coe_smul Sylow.coe_smul
theorem Sylow.smul_le {P : Sylow p G} {H : Subgroup G} (hP : ↑P ≤ H) (h : H) : ↑(h • P) ≤ H :=
Subgroup.conj_smul_le_of_le hP h
#align sylow.smul_le Sylow.smul_le
theorem Sylow.smul_subtype {P : Sylow p G} {H : Subgroup G} (hP : ↑P ≤ H) (h : H) :
h • P.subtype hP = (h • P).subtype (Sylow.smul_le hP h) :=
Sylow.ext (Subgroup.conj_smul_subgroupOf hP h)
#align sylow.smul_subtype Sylow.smul_subtype
theorem Sylow.smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} :
g • P = P ↔ g ∈ (P : Subgroup G).normalizer := by
rw [eq_comm, SetLike.ext_iff, ← inv_mem_iff (G := G) (H := normalizer P.toSubgroup),
mem_normalizer_iff, inv_inv]
exact
forall_congr' fun h =>
iff_congr Iff.rfl
⟨fun ⟨a, b, c⟩ => c ▸ by simpa [mul_assoc] using b,
fun hh => ⟨(MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ h, hh, MulAut.apply_inv_self G (MulAut.conj g) h⟩⟩
#align sylow.smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer Sylow.smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer
theorem Sylow.smul_eq_of_normal {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} [h : (P : Subgroup G).Normal] :
g • P = P := by simp only [Sylow.smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer, normalizer_eq_top.mpr h, mem_top]
#align sylow.smul_eq_of_normal Sylow.smul_eq_of_normal
theorem Subgroup.sylow_mem_fixedPoints_iff (H : Subgroup G) {P : Sylow p G} :
P ∈ fixedPoints H (Sylow p G) ↔ H ≤ (P : Subgroup G).normalizer := by
simp_rw [SetLike.le_def, ← Sylow.smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer]; exact Subtype.forall
#align subgroup.sylow_mem_fixed_points_iff Subgroup.sylow_mem_fixedPoints_iff
theorem IsPGroup.inf_normalizer_sylow {P : Subgroup G} (hP : IsPGroup p P) (Q : Sylow p G) :
P ⊓ (Q : Subgroup G).normalizer = P ⊓ Q :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf inf_le_left
(sup_eq_right.mp
(Q.3 (hP.to_inf_left.to_sup_of_normal_right' Q.2 inf_le_right) le_sup_right)))
(inf_le_inf_left P le_normalizer)
#align is_p_group.inf_normalizer_sylow IsPGroup.inf_normalizer_sylow
theorem IsPGroup.sylow_mem_fixedPoints_iff {P : Subgroup G} (hP : IsPGroup p P) {Q : Sylow p G} :
Q ∈ fixedPoints P (Sylow p G) ↔ P ≤ Q := by
rw [P.sylow_mem_fixedPoints_iff, ← inf_eq_left, hP.inf_normalizer_sylow, inf_eq_left]
#align is_p_group.sylow_mem_fixed_points_iff IsPGroup.sylow_mem_fixedPoints_iff
/-- A generalization of **Sylow's second theorem**.
If the number of Sylow `p`-subgroups is finite, then all Sylow `p`-subgroups are conjugate. -/
instance [hp : Fact p.Prime] [Finite (Sylow p G)] : IsPretransitive G (Sylow p G) :=
⟨fun P Q => by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype (Sylow p G)
have H := fun {R : Sylow p G} {S : orbit G P} =>
calc
S ∈ fixedPoints R (orbit G P) ↔ S.1 ∈ fixedPoints R (Sylow p G) :=
forall_congr' fun a => Subtype.ext_iff
_ ↔ R.1 ≤ S := R.2.sylow_mem_fixedPoints_iff
_ ↔ S.1.1 = R := ⟨fun h => R.3 S.1.2 h, ge_of_eq⟩
suffices Set.Nonempty (fixedPoints Q (orbit G P)) by
exact Exists.elim this fun R hR => by
rw [← Sylow.ext (H.mp hR)]
exact R.2
apply Q.2.nonempty_fixed_point_of_prime_not_dvd_card
refine fun h => hp.out.not_dvd_one (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mp ?_)
calc
1 = card (fixedPoints P (orbit G P)) := ?_
_ ≡ card (orbit G P) [MOD p] := (P.2.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints (orbit G P)).symm
_ ≡ 0 [MOD p] := Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mpr h
rw [← Set.card_singleton (⟨P, mem_orbit_self P⟩ : orbit G P)]
refine card_congr' (congr_arg _ (Eq.symm ?_))
rw [Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem]
exact ⟨H.mpr rfl, fun R h => Subtype.ext (Sylow.ext (H.mp h))⟩⟩
variable (p) (G)
/-- A generalization of **Sylow's third theorem**.
If the number of Sylow `p`-subgroups is finite, then it is congruent to `1` modulo `p`. -/
theorem card_sylow_modEq_one [Fact p.Prime] [Fintype (Sylow p G)] :
card (Sylow p G) ≡ 1 [MOD p] := by
refine Sylow.nonempty.elim fun P : Sylow p G => ?_
have : fixedPoints P.1 (Sylow p G) = {P} :=
Set.ext fun Q : Sylow p G =>
calc
Q ∈ fixedPoints P (Sylow p G) ↔ P.1 ≤ Q := P.2.sylow_mem_fixedPoints_iff
_ ↔ Q.1 = P.1 := ⟨P.3 Q.2, ge_of_eq⟩
_ ↔ Q ∈ {P} := Sylow.ext_iff.symm.trans Set.mem_singleton_iff.symm
have fin : Fintype (fixedPoints P.1 (Sylow p G)) := by
rw [this]
infer_instance
have : card (fixedPoints P.1 (Sylow p G)) = 1 := by simp [this]
exact (P.2.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints (Sylow p G)).trans (by rw [this])
#align card_sylow_modeq_one card_sylow_modEq_one
theorem not_dvd_card_sylow [hp : Fact p.Prime] [Fintype (Sylow p G)] : ¬p ∣ card (Sylow p G) :=
fun h =>
hp.1.ne_one
(Nat.dvd_one.mp
((Nat.modEq_iff_dvd' zero_le_one).mp
((Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mpr h).symm.trans (card_sylow_modEq_one p G))))
#align not_dvd_card_sylow not_dvd_card_sylow
variable {p} {G}
/-- Sylow subgroups are isomorphic -/
nonrec def Sylow.equivSMul (P : Sylow p G) (g : G) : P ≃* (g • P : Sylow p G) :=
equivSMul (MulAut.conj g) P.toSubgroup
#align sylow.equiv_smul Sylow.equivSMul
/-- Sylow subgroups are isomorphic -/
noncomputable def Sylow.equiv [Fact p.Prime] [Finite (Sylow p G)] (P Q : Sylow p G) : P ≃* Q := by
rw [← Classical.choose_spec (exists_smul_eq G P Q)]
exact P.equivSMul (Classical.choose (exists_smul_eq G P Q))
#align sylow.equiv Sylow.equiv
@[simp]
theorem Sylow.orbit_eq_top [Fact p.Prime] [Finite (Sylow p G)] (P : Sylow p G) : orbit G P = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp fun Q _ => exists_smul_eq G P Q
#align sylow.orbit_eq_top Sylow.orbit_eq_top
theorem Sylow.stabilizer_eq_normalizer (P : Sylow p G) :
stabilizer G P = (P : Subgroup G).normalizer := by
ext; simp [Sylow.smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer]
#align sylow.stabilizer_eq_normalizer Sylow.stabilizer_eq_normalizer
theorem Sylow.conj_eq_normalizer_conj_of_mem_centralizer [Fact p.Prime] [Finite (Sylow p G)]
(P : Sylow p G) (x g : G) (hx : x ∈ centralizer (P : Set G))
(hy : g⁻¹ * x * g ∈ centralizer (P : Set G)) :
∃ n ∈ (P : Subgroup G).normalizer, g⁻¹ * x * g = n⁻¹ * x * n := by
have h1 : ↑P ≤ centralizer (zpowers x : Set G) := by rwa [le_centralizer_iff, zpowers_le]
have h2 : ↑(g • P) ≤ centralizer (zpowers x : Set G) := by
rw [le_centralizer_iff, zpowers_le]
rintro - ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
specialize hy z hz
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc] at hy
obtain ⟨h, hh⟩ :=
exists_smul_eq (centralizer (zpowers x : Set G)) ((g • P).subtype h2) (P.subtype h1)
simp_rw [Sylow.smul_subtype, Subgroup.smul_def, smul_smul] at hh
refine ⟨h * g, Sylow.smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer.mp (Sylow.subtype_injective hh), ?_⟩
rw [← mul_assoc, Commute.right_comm (h.prop x (mem_zpowers x)), mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align sylow.conj_eq_normalizer_conj_of_mem_centralizer Sylow.conj_eq_normalizer_conj_of_mem_centralizer
theorem Sylow.conj_eq_normalizer_conj_of_mem [Fact p.Prime] [Finite (Sylow p G)] (P : Sylow p G)
[_hP : (P : Subgroup G).IsCommutative] (x g : G) (hx : x ∈ P) (hy : g⁻¹ * x * g ∈ P) :
∃ n ∈ (P : Subgroup G).normalizer, g⁻¹ * x * g = n⁻¹ * x * n :=
P.conj_eq_normalizer_conj_of_mem_centralizer x g (le_centralizer P hx) (le_centralizer P hy)
#align sylow.conj_eq_normalizer_conj_of_mem Sylow.conj_eq_normalizer_conj_of_mem
/-- Sylow `p`-subgroups are in bijection with cosets of the normalizer of a Sylow `p`-subgroup -/
noncomputable def Sylow.equivQuotientNormalizer [Fact p.Prime] [Finite (Sylow p G)]
(P : Sylow p G) : Sylow p G ≃ G ⧸ (P : Subgroup G).normalizer :=
calc
Sylow p G ≃ (⊤ : Set (Sylow p G)) := (Equiv.Set.univ (Sylow p G)).symm
_ ≃ orbit G P := Equiv.setCongr P.orbit_eq_top.symm
_ ≃ G ⧸ stabilizer G P := orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer G P
_ ≃ G ⧸ (P : Subgroup G).normalizer := by rw [P.stabilizer_eq_normalizer]
#align sylow.equiv_quotient_normalizer Sylow.equivQuotientNormalizer
noncomputable instance [Fact p.Prime] [Fintype (Sylow p G)] (P : Sylow p G) :
Fintype (G ⧸ (P : Subgroup G).normalizer) :=
ofEquiv (Sylow p G) P.equivQuotientNormalizer
theorem card_sylow_eq_card_quotient_normalizer [Fact p.Prime] [Fintype (Sylow p G)]
(P : Sylow p G) : card (Sylow p G) = card (G ⧸ (P : Subgroup G).normalizer) :=
card_congr P.equivQuotientNormalizer
#align card_sylow_eq_card_quotient_normalizer card_sylow_eq_card_quotient_normalizer
theorem card_sylow_eq_index_normalizer [Fact p.Prime] [Fintype (Sylow p G)] (P : Sylow p G) :
card (Sylow p G) = (P : Subgroup G).normalizer.index :=
(card_sylow_eq_card_quotient_normalizer P).trans (P : Subgroup G).normalizer.index_eq_card.symm
#align card_sylow_eq_index_normalizer card_sylow_eq_index_normalizer
theorem card_sylow_dvd_index [Fact p.Prime] [Fintype (Sylow p G)] (P : Sylow p G) :
card (Sylow p G) ∣ (P : Subgroup G).index :=
((congr_arg _ (card_sylow_eq_index_normalizer P)).mp dvd_rfl).trans
(index_dvd_of_le le_normalizer)
#align card_sylow_dvd_index card_sylow_dvd_index
theorem not_dvd_index_sylow' [hp : Fact p.Prime] (P : Sylow p G) [(P : Subgroup G).Normal]
[fP : FiniteIndex (P : Subgroup G)] : ¬p ∣ (P : Subgroup G).index := by
intro h
letI : Fintype (G ⧸ (P : Subgroup G)) := (P : Subgroup G).fintypeQuotientOfFiniteIndex
rw [index_eq_card (P : Subgroup G)] at h
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card (G := G ⧸ (P : Subgroup G)) p h
have h := IsPGroup.of_card ((Fintype.card_zpowers.trans hx).trans (pow_one p).symm)
let Q := (zpowers x).comap (QuotientGroup.mk' (P : Subgroup G))
have hQ : IsPGroup p Q := by
apply h.comap_of_ker_isPGroup
rw [QuotientGroup.ker_mk']
exact P.2
replace hp := mt orderOf_eq_one_iff.mpr (ne_of_eq_of_ne hx hp.1.ne_one)
rw [← zpowers_eq_bot, ← Ne, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, ←
comap_lt_comap_of_surjective (QuotientGroup.mk'_surjective _), MonoidHom.comap_bot,
QuotientGroup.ker_mk'] at hp
exact hp.ne' (P.3 hQ hp.le)
#align not_dvd_index_sylow' not_dvd_index_sylow'
theorem not_dvd_index_sylow [hp : Fact p.Prime] [Finite (Sylow p G)] (P : Sylow p G)
(hP : relindex ↑P (P : Subgroup G).normalizer ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ (P : Subgroup G).index := by
cases nonempty_fintype (Sylow p G)
rw [← relindex_mul_index le_normalizer, ← card_sylow_eq_index_normalizer]
haveI : (P.subtype le_normalizer : Subgroup (P : Subgroup G).normalizer).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_in_normalizer
haveI : FiniteIndex ↑(P.subtype le_normalizer : Subgroup (P : Subgroup G).normalizer) := ⟨hP⟩
replace hP := not_dvd_index_sylow' (P.subtype le_normalizer)
exact hp.1.not_dvd_mul hP (not_dvd_card_sylow p G)
#align not_dvd_index_sylow not_dvd_index_sylow
/-- **Frattini's Argument**: If `N` is a normal subgroup of `G`, and if `P` is a Sylow `p`-subgroup
of `N`, then `N_G(P) ⊔ N = G`. -/
theorem Sylow.normalizer_sup_eq_top {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal]
[Finite (Sylow p N)] (P : Sylow p N) :
((↑P : Subgroup N).map N.subtype).normalizer ⊔ N = ⊤ := by
refine top_le_iff.mp fun g _ => ?_
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_smul_eq N ((MulAut.conjNormal g : MulAut N) • P) P
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left (↑n) g, sup_comm]
apply mul_mem_sup (N.inv_mem n.2)
rw [Sylow.smul_def, ← mul_smul, ← MulAut.conjNormal_val, ← MulAut.conjNormal.map_mul,
Sylow.ext_iff, Sylow.pointwise_smul_def, Subgroup.pointwise_smul_def] at hn
have : Function.Injective (MulAut.conj (n * g)).toMonoidHom := (MulAut.conj (n * g)).injective
refine fun x ↦ (mem_map_iff_mem this).symm.trans ?_
rw [map_map, ← congr_arg (map N.subtype) hn, map_map]
rfl
#align sylow.normalizer_sup_eq_top Sylow.normalizer_sup_eq_top
/-- **Frattini's Argument**: If `N` is a normal subgroup of `G`, and if `P` is a Sylow `p`-subgroup
of `N`, then `N_G(P) ⊔ N = G`. -/
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Sylow.lean | 477 | 480 | theorem Sylow.normalizer_sup_eq_top' {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal]
[Finite (Sylow p N)] (P : Sylow p G) (hP : ↑P ≤ N) : (P : Subgroup G).normalizer ⊔ N = ⊤ := by |
rw [← Sylow.normalizer_sup_eq_top (P.subtype hP), P.coe_subtype, subgroupOf_map_subtype,
inf_of_le_left hP]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.graded_algebra.homogeneous_localization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"831c494092374cfe9f50591ed0ac81a25efc5b86"
/-!
# Homogeneous Localization
## Notation
- `ι` is a commutative monoid;
- `R` is a commutative semiring;
- `A` is a commutative ring and an `R`-algebra;
- `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A` is the grading of `A`;
- `x : Submonoid A` is a submonoid
## Main definitions and results
This file constructs the subring of `Aₓ` where the numerator and denominator have the same grading,
i.e. `{a/b ∈ Aₓ | ∃ (i : ι), a ∈ 𝒜ᵢ ∧ b ∈ 𝒜ᵢ}`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg`: a structure with a numerator and denominator field
where they are required to have the same grading.
However `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` cannot have a ring structure for many reasons, for example if `c`
is a `NumDenSameDeg`, then generally, `c + (-c)` is not necessarily `0` for degree reasons ---
`0` is considered to have grade zero (see `deg_zero`) but `c + (-c)` has the same degree as `c`. To
circumvent this, we quotient `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` by the kernel of `c ↦ c.num / c.den`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding`: for `x : Submonoid A` and any
`c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x`, or equivalent a numerator and a denominator of the same degree,
we get an element `c.num / c.den` of `Aₓ`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization`: `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` quotiented by kernel of `embedding 𝒜 x`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.val`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.val` is an element
of `Aₓ`. In another word, one can view `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` as a subring of `Aₓ`
through `HomogeneousLocalization.val`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.num`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.num : A` is the
numerator of `f`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.den`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.den : A` is the
denominator of `f`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.deg : ι` is the
degree of `f` such that `f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg` and `f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`
(see `HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg` and `HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg`).
* `HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.num_mem_deg` is a proof that `f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.den_mem_deg` is a proof that `f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.eq_num_div_den`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.val : Aₓ` is equal to `f.num / f.den`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.localRing`: `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` is a local ring when `x` is
the complement of some prime ideals.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.map`: Let `A` and `B` be two graded rings and `g : A → B` a grading
preserving ring map. If `P ≤ A` and `Q ≤ B` are submonoids such that `P ≤ g⁻¹(Q)`, then `g`
induces a ring map between the homogeneous localization of `A` at `P` and the homogeneous
localization of `B` at `Q`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
noncomputable section
open DirectSum Pointwise
open DirectSum SetLike
variable {ι R A : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [DecidableEq ι]
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A) [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
variable (x : Submonoid A)
local notation "at " x => Localization x
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
section
/-- Let `x` be a submonoid of `A`, then `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` is a structure with a numerator and a
denominator with same grading such that the denominator is contained in `x`.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure NumDenSameDeg where
deg : ι
(num den : 𝒜 deg)
den_mem : (den : A) ∈ x
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg
end
namespace NumDenSameDeg
open SetLike.GradedMonoid Submodule
variable {𝒜}
@[ext]
theorem ext {c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x} (hdeg : c1.deg = c2.deg) (hnum : (c1.num : A) = c2.num)
(hden : (c1.den : A) = c2.den) : c1 = c2 := by
rcases c1 with ⟨i1, ⟨n1, hn1⟩, ⟨d1, hd1⟩, h1⟩
rcases c2 with ⟨i2, ⟨n2, hn2⟩, ⟨d2, hd2⟩, h2⟩
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at *
subst hdeg hnum hden
congr
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.ext HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.ext
instance : One (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
one :=
{ deg := 0
-- Porting note: Changed `one_mem` to `GradedOne.one_mem`
num := ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩
den := ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.one_mem _ }
@[simp]
theorem deg_one : (1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).deg = 0 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_one HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_one
@[simp]
theorem num_one : ((1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).num : A) = 1 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_one HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_one
@[simp]
theorem den_one : ((1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).den : A) = 1 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_one HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_one
instance : Zero (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
zero := ⟨0, 0, ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩, Submonoid.one_mem _⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_zero : (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).deg = 0 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_zero HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_zero
@[simp]
theorem num_zero : (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).num = 0 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_zero HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_zero
@[simp]
theorem den_zero : ((0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).den : A) = 1 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_zero HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_zero
instance : Mul (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
mul p q :=
{ deg := p.deg + q.deg
-- Porting note: Changed `mul_mem` to `GradedMul.mul_mem`
num := ⟨p.num * q.num, GradedMul.mul_mem p.num.prop q.num.prop⟩
den := ⟨p.den * q.den, GradedMul.mul_mem p.den.prop q.den.prop⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.mul_mem _ p.den_mem q.den_mem }
@[simp]
theorem deg_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (c1 * c2).deg = c1.deg + c2.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_mul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_mul
@[simp]
theorem num_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 * c2).num : A) = c1.num * c2.num :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_mul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_mul
@[simp]
theorem den_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 * c2).den : A) = c1.den * c2.den :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_mul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_mul
instance : Add (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
add c1 c2 :=
{ deg := c1.deg + c2.deg
num := ⟨c1.den * c2.num + c2.den * c1.num,
add_mem (GradedMul.mul_mem c1.den.2 c2.num.2)
(add_comm c2.deg c1.deg ▸ GradedMul.mul_mem c2.den.2 c1.num.2)⟩
den := ⟨c1.den * c2.den, GradedMul.mul_mem c1.den.2 c2.den.2⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.mul_mem _ c1.den_mem c2.den_mem }
@[simp]
theorem deg_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (c1 + c2).deg = c1.deg + c2.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_add HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_add
@[simp]
theorem num_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) :
((c1 + c2).num : A) = c1.den * c2.num + c2.den * c1.num :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_add HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_add
@[simp]
theorem den_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 + c2).den : A) = c1.den * c2.den :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_add HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_add
instance : Neg (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
neg c := ⟨c.deg, ⟨-c.num, neg_mem c.num.2⟩, c.den, c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (-c).deg = c.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_neg HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_neg
@[simp]
theorem num_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((-c).num : A) = -c.num :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_neg HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_neg
@[simp]
theorem den_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((-c).den : A) = c.den :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_neg HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_neg
instance : CommMonoid (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc c1 c2 c3 := ext _ (add_assoc _ _ _) (mul_assoc _ _ _) (mul_assoc _ _ _)
one_mul c := ext _ (zero_add _) (one_mul _) (one_mul _)
mul_one c := ext _ (add_zero _) (mul_one _) (mul_one _)
mul_comm c1 c2 := ext _ (add_comm _ _) (mul_comm _ _) (mul_comm _ _)
instance : Pow (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) ℕ where
pow c n :=
⟨n • c.deg, @GradedMonoid.GMonoid.gnpow _ (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) _ _ n _ c.num,
@GradedMonoid.GMonoid.gnpow _ (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) _ _ n _ c.den, by
induction' n with n ih
· simpa only [Nat.zero_eq, coe_gnpow, pow_zero] using Submonoid.one_mem _
· simpa only [pow_succ, coe_gnpow] using x.mul_mem ih c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : (c ^ n).deg = n • c.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_pow HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_pow
@[simp]
theorem num_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : ((c ^ n).num : A) = (c.num : A) ^ n :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_pow HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_pow
@[simp]
theorem den_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : ((c ^ n).den : A) = (c.den : A) ^ n :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_pow HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_pow
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α R] [SMul α A] [IsScalarTower α R A]
instance : SMul α (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
smul m c := ⟨c.deg, m • c.num, c.den, c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : (m • c).deg = c.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_smul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_smul
@[simp]
theorem num_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : ((m • c).num : A) = m • c.num :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_smul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_smul
@[simp]
theorem den_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : ((m • c).den : A) = c.den :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_smul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_smul
end SMul
variable (𝒜)
/-- For `x : prime ideal of A` and any `p : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x`, or equivalent a numerator and a
denominator of the same degree, we get an element `p.num / p.den` of `Aₓ`.
-/
def embedding (p : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : at x :=
Localization.mk p.num ⟨p.den, p.den_mem⟩
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.embedding HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding
end NumDenSameDeg
end HomogeneousLocalization
/-- For `x : prime ideal of A`, `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` is `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` modulo the
kernel of `embedding 𝒜 x`. This is essentially the subring of `Aₓ` where the numerator and
denominator share the same grading.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def HomogeneousLocalization : Type _ :=
Quotient (Setoid.ker <| HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding 𝒜 x)
#align homogeneous_localization HomogeneousLocalization
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
open HomogeneousLocalization HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg
variable {𝒜} {x}
/-- Construct an element of `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` from a homogeneous fraction. -/
abbrev mk (y : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x :=
Quotient.mk'' y
lemma mk_surjective : Function.Surjective (mk (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''
/-- View an element of `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` as an element of `Aₓ` by forgetting that the
numerator and denominator are of the same grading.
-/
def val (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : at x :=
Quotient.liftOn' y (NumDenSameDeg.embedding 𝒜 x) fun _ _ => id
#align homogeneous_localization.val HomogeneousLocalization.val
@[simp]
theorem val_mk (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) :
val (mk i) = Localization.mk (i.num : A) ⟨i.den, i.den_mem⟩ :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.val_mk' HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk
variable (x)
@[ext]
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (HomogeneousLocalization.val (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)) :=
fun a b => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' a b fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound' h
#align homogeneous_localization.val_injective HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective
variable (𝒜) {x} in
lemma subsingleton (hx : 0 ∈ x) : Subsingleton (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
have := IsLocalization.subsingleton (S := at x) hx
(HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)).subsingleton
instance hasPow : Pow (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) ℕ where
pow z n :=
(Quotient.map' (· ^ n) fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_pow, den_pow]
convert congr_arg (fun z : at x => z ^ n) h <;> erw [Localization.mk_pow] <;> rfl :
HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x → HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x)
z
#align homogeneous_localization.has_pow HomogeneousLocalization.hasPow
@[simp] lemma mk_pow (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : mk (i ^ n) = mk i ^ n := rfl
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α R] [SMul α A] [IsScalarTower α R A]
variable [IsScalarTower α A A]
instance : SMul α (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
smul m := Quotient.map' (m • ·) fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_smul, den_smul]
convert congr_arg (fun z : at x => m • z) h <;> rw [Localization.smul_mk]
@[simp] lemma mk_smul (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : mk (m • i) = m • mk i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_smul (n : α) : ∀ y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (n • y).val = n • y.val :=
Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ by rw [← mk_smul, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.smul_mk]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.smul_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_smul
end SMul
instance : Neg (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
neg := Quotient.map' Neg.neg fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_neg, den_neg, ← Localization.neg_mk]
exact congr_arg Neg.neg h
@[simp] lemma mk_neg (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (-i) = -mk i := rfl
instance : Add (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
add :=
Quotient.map₂' (· + ·)
fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) c3 c4
(h' : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_add, den_add, ← Localization.add_mk]
convert congr_arg₂ (· + ·) h h' <;> erw [Localization.add_mk] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_add (i j : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (i + j) = mk i + mk j := rfl
instance : Sub (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where sub z1 z2 := z1 + -z2
instance : Mul (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
mul :=
Quotient.map₂' (· * ·)
fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) c3 c4
(h' : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_mul, den_mul]
convert congr_arg₂ (· * ·) h h' <;> erw [Localization.mk_mul] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_mul (i j : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (i * j) = mk i * mk j := rfl
instance : One (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where one := Quotient.mk'' 1
@[simp] lemma mk_one : mk (1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) = 1 := rfl
instance : Zero (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where zero := Quotient.mk'' 0
@[simp] lemma mk_zero : mk (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_eq : (0 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) = Quotient.mk'' 0 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.zero_eq HomogeneousLocalization.zero_eq
theorem one_eq : (1 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) = Quotient.mk'' 1 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.one_eq HomogeneousLocalization.one_eq
variable {x}
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : (0 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = 0 :=
Localization.mk_zero _
#align homogeneous_localization.zero_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_zero
@[simp]
theorem val_one : (1 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = 1 :=
Localization.mk_one
#align homogeneous_localization.one_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_one
@[simp]
theorem val_add : ∀ y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (y1 + y2).val = y1.val + y2.val :=
Quotient.ind₂' fun y1 y2 ↦ by rw [← mk_add, val_mk, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.add_mk]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.add_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_add
@[simp]
theorem val_mul : ∀ y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (y1 * y2).val = y1.val * y2.val :=
Quotient.ind₂' fun y1 y2 ↦ by rw [← mk_mul, val_mk, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.mk_mul]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.mul_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_mul
@[simp]
theorem val_neg : ∀ y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (-y).val = -y.val :=
Quotient.ind' fun y ↦ by rw [← mk_neg, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.neg_mk]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.neg_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_neg
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/HomogeneousLocalization.lean | 449 | 450 | theorem val_sub (y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : (y1 - y2).val = y1.val - y2.val := by |
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← val_neg, ← val_add]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RieszLemma
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Matrix
#align_import analysis.normed_space.finite_dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9425b6f8220e53b059f5a4904786c3c4b50fc057"
/-!
# Finite dimensional normed spaces over complete fields
Over a complete nontrivially normed field, in finite dimension, all norms are equivalent and all
linear maps are continuous. Moreover, a finite-dimensional subspace is always complete and closed.
## Main results:
* `FiniteDimensional.complete` : a finite-dimensional space over a complete field is complete. This
is not registered as an instance, as the field would be an unknown metavariable in typeclass
resolution.
* `Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional` : a finite-dimensional subspace over a complete field is
closed
* `FiniteDimensional.proper` : a finite-dimensional space over a proper field is proper. This
is not registered as an instance, as the field would be an unknown metavariable in typeclass
resolution. It is however registered as an instance for `𝕜 = ℝ` and `𝕜 = ℂ`. As properness
implies completeness, there is no need to also register `FiniteDimensional.complete` on `ℝ` or
`ℂ`.
* `FiniteDimensional.of_isCompact_closedBall`: Riesz' theorem: if the closed unit ball is
compact, then the space is finite-dimensional.
## Implementation notes
The fact that all norms are equivalent is not written explicitly, as it would mean having two norms
on a single space, which is not the way type classes work. However, if one has a
finite-dimensional vector space `E` with a norm, and a copy `E'` of this type with another norm,
then the identities from `E` to `E'` and from `E'`to `E` are continuous thanks to
`LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional`. This gives the desired norm equivalence.
-/
universe u v w x
noncomputable section
open Set FiniteDimensional TopologicalSpace Filter Asymptotics Classical Topology
NNReal Metric
namespace LinearIsometry
open LinearMap
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {F E₁ : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup E₁] [Module R E₁]
variable {R₁ : Type*} [Field R₁] [Module R₁ E₁] [Module R₁ F] [FiniteDimensional R₁ E₁]
[FiniteDimensional R₁ F]
/-- A linear isometry between finite dimensional spaces of equal dimension can be upgraded
to a linear isometry equivalence. -/
def toLinearIsometryEquiv (li : E₁ →ₗᵢ[R₁] F) (h : finrank R₁ E₁ = finrank R₁ F) :
E₁ ≃ₗᵢ[R₁] F where
toLinearEquiv := li.toLinearMap.linearEquivOfInjective li.injective h
norm_map' := li.norm_map'
#align linear_isometry.to_linear_isometry_equiv LinearIsometry.toLinearIsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLinearIsometryEquiv (li : E₁ →ₗᵢ[R₁] F) (h : finrank R₁ E₁ = finrank R₁ F) :
(li.toLinearIsometryEquiv h : E₁ → F) = li :=
rfl
#align linear_isometry.coe_to_linear_isometry_equiv LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearIsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem toLinearIsometryEquiv_apply (li : E₁ →ₗᵢ[R₁] F) (h : finrank R₁ E₁ = finrank R₁ F)
(x : E₁) : (li.toLinearIsometryEquiv h) x = li x :=
rfl
#align linear_isometry.to_linear_isometry_equiv_apply LinearIsometry.toLinearIsometryEquiv_apply
end LinearIsometry
namespace AffineIsometry
open AffineMap
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {V₁ V₂ : Type*} {P₁ P₂ : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup V₁]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup V₂] [NormedSpace 𝕜 V₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 V₂] [MetricSpace P₁]
[PseudoMetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₁ P₁] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 V₁] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 V₂]
/-- An affine isometry between finite dimensional spaces of equal dimension can be upgraded
to an affine isometry equivalence. -/
def toAffineIsometryEquiv [Inhabited P₁] (li : P₁ →ᵃⁱ[𝕜] P₂) (h : finrank 𝕜 V₁ = finrank 𝕜 V₂) :
P₁ ≃ᵃⁱ[𝕜] P₂ :=
AffineIsometryEquiv.mk' li (li.linearIsometry.toLinearIsometryEquiv h)
(Inhabited.default (α := P₁)) fun p => by simp
#align affine_isometry.to_affine_isometry_equiv AffineIsometry.toAffineIsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAffineIsometryEquiv [Inhabited P₁] (li : P₁ →ᵃⁱ[𝕜] P₂)
(h : finrank 𝕜 V₁ = finrank 𝕜 V₂) : (li.toAffineIsometryEquiv h : P₁ → P₂) = li :=
rfl
#align affine_isometry.coe_to_affine_isometry_equiv AffineIsometry.coe_toAffineIsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem toAffineIsometryEquiv_apply [Inhabited P₁] (li : P₁ →ᵃⁱ[𝕜] P₂)
(h : finrank 𝕜 V₁ = finrank 𝕜 V₂) (x : P₁) : (li.toAffineIsometryEquiv h) x = li x :=
rfl
#align affine_isometry.to_affine_isometry_equiv_apply AffineIsometry.toAffineIsometryEquiv_apply
end AffineIsometry
section CompleteField
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type x}
[AddCommGroup F'] [Module 𝕜 F'] [TopologicalSpace F'] [TopologicalAddGroup F']
[ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F'] [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
section Affine
variable {PE PF : Type*} [MetricSpace PE] [NormedAddTorsor E PE] [MetricSpace PF]
[NormedAddTorsor F PF] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E]
theorem AffineMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional (f : PE →ᵃ[𝕜] PF) : Continuous f :=
AffineMap.continuous_linear_iff.1 f.linear.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
#align affine_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional AffineMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
theorem AffineEquiv.continuous_of_finiteDimensional (f : PE ≃ᵃ[𝕜] PF) : Continuous f :=
f.toAffineMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
#align affine_equiv.continuous_of_finite_dimensional AffineEquiv.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
/-- Reinterpret an affine equivalence as a homeomorphism. -/
def AffineEquiv.toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional (f : PE ≃ᵃ[𝕜] PF) : PE ≃ₜ PF where
toEquiv := f.toEquiv
continuous_toFun := f.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
continuous_invFun :=
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F := f.linear.finiteDimensional
f.symm.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
#align affine_equiv.to_homeomorph_of_finite_dimensional AffineEquiv.toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.coe_toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional (f : PE ≃ᵃ[𝕜] PF) :
⇑f.toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional = f :=
rfl
#align affine_equiv.coe_to_homeomorph_of_finite_dimensional AffineEquiv.coe_toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.coe_toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional_symm (f : PE ≃ᵃ[𝕜] PF) :
⇑f.toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional.symm = f.symm :=
rfl
#align affine_equiv.coe_to_homeomorph_of_finite_dimensional_symm AffineEquiv.coe_toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional_symm
end Affine
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det : Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] E => f.det := by
change Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] E => LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E)
-- Porting note: this could be easier with `det_cases`
by_cases h : ∃ s : Finset E, Nonempty (Basis (↥s) 𝕜 E)
· rcases h with ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis b
simp_rw [LinearMap.det_eq_det_toMatrix_of_finset b]
refine Continuous.matrix_det ?_
exact
((LinearMap.toMatrix b b).toLinearMap.comp
(ContinuousLinearMap.coeLM 𝕜)).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
· -- Porting note: was `unfold LinearMap.det`
rw [LinearMap.det_def]
simpa only [h, MonoidHom.one_apply, dif_neg, not_false_iff] using continuous_const
#align continuous_linear_map.continuous_det ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det
/-- Any `K`-Lipschitz map from a subset `s` of a metric space `α` to a finite-dimensional real
vector space `E'` can be extended to a Lipschitz map on the whole space `α`, with a slightly worse
constant `C * K` where `C` only depends on `E'`. We record a working value for this constant `C`
as `lipschitzExtensionConstant E'`. -/
irreducible_def lipschitzExtensionConstant (E' : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] : ℝ≥0 :=
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E').equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
max (‖A.symm.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * ‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊) 1
#align lipschitz_extension_constant lipschitzExtensionConstant
theorem lipschitzExtensionConstant_pos (E' : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] : 0 < lipschitzExtensionConstant E' := by
rw [lipschitzExtensionConstant]
exact zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _)
#align lipschitz_extension_constant_pos lipschitzExtensionConstant_pos
/-- Any `K`-Lipschitz map from a subset `s` of a metric space `α` to a finite-dimensional real
vector space `E'` can be extended to a Lipschitz map on the whole space `α`, with a slightly worse
constant `lipschitzExtensionConstant E' * K`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.extend_finite_dimension {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] {s : Set α} {f : α → E'}
{K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) :
∃ g : α → E', LipschitzWith (lipschitzExtensionConstant E' * K) g ∧ EqOn f g s := by
/- This result is already known for spaces `ι → ℝ`. We use a continuous linear equiv between
`E'` and such a space to transfer the result to `E'`. -/
let ι : Type _ := Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex ℝ E'
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E').equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
have LA : LipschitzWith ‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ A := by apply A.lipschitz
have L : LipschitzOnWith (‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * K) (A ∘ f) s :=
LA.comp_lipschitzOnWith hf
obtain ⟨g, hg, gs⟩ :
∃ g : α → ι → ℝ, LipschitzWith (‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * K) g ∧ EqOn (A ∘ f) g s :=
L.extend_pi
refine ⟨A.symm ∘ g, ?_, ?_⟩
· have LAsymm : LipschitzWith ‖A.symm.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ A.symm := by
apply A.symm.lipschitz
apply (LAsymm.comp hg).weaken
rw [lipschitzExtensionConstant, ← mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul' (le_max_left _ _) le_rfl
· intro x hx
have : A (f x) = g x := gs hx
simp only [(· ∘ ·), ← this, A.symm_apply_apply]
#align lipschitz_on_with.extend_finite_dimension LipschitzOnWith.extend_finite_dimension
theorem LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) : ∃ K > 0, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial E
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, AntilipschitzWith.of_subsingleton⟩
· rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot] at hf
let e : E ≃L[𝕜] LinearMap.range f := (LinearEquiv.ofInjective f hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
exact ⟨_, e.nnnorm_symm_pos, e.antilipschitz⟩
#align linear_map.exists_antilipschitz_with LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith
open Function in
/-- A `LinearMap` on a finite-dimensional space over a complete field
is injective iff it is anti-Lipschitz. -/
theorem LinearMap.injective_iff_antilipschitz [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
Injective f ↔ ∃ K > 0, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
constructor
· rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
exact f.exists_antilipschitzWith
· rintro ⟨K, -, H⟩
exact H.injective
open Function in
/-- The set of injective continuous linear maps `E → F` is open,
if `E` is finite-dimensional over a complete field. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.isOpen_injective [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] :
IsOpen { L : E →L[𝕜] F | Injective L } := by
rw [isOpen_iff_eventually]
rintro φ₀ hφ₀
rcases φ₀.injective_iff_antilipschitz.mp hφ₀ with ⟨K, K_pos, H⟩
have : ∀ᶠ φ in 𝓝 φ₀, ‖φ - φ₀‖₊ < K⁻¹ := eventually_nnnorm_sub_lt _ <| inv_pos_of_pos K_pos
filter_upwards [this] with φ hφ
apply φ.injective_iff_antilipschitz.mpr
exact ⟨(K⁻¹ - ‖φ - φ₀‖₊)⁻¹, inv_pos_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt hφ),
H.add_sub_lipschitzWith (φ - φ₀).lipschitz hφ⟩
protected theorem LinearIndependent.eventually {ι} [Finite ι] {f : ι → E}
(hf : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) : ∀ᶠ g in 𝓝 f, LinearIndependent 𝕜 g := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
simp only [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff'] at hf ⊢
rcases LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith _ hf with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
have : Tendsto (fun g : ι → E => ∑ i, ‖g i - f i‖) (𝓝 f) (𝓝 <| ∑ i, ‖f i - f i‖) :=
tendsto_finset_sum _ fun i _ =>
Tendsto.norm <| ((continuous_apply i).tendsto _).sub tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [sub_self, norm_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero] at this
refine (this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds <| inv_pos.2 K0)).mono fun g hg => ?_
replace hg : ∑ i, ‖g i - f i‖₊ < K⁻¹ := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_lt_coe]
push_cast
exact hg
rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
refine (hK.add_sub_lipschitzWith (LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun v u => ?_) hg).injective
simp only [dist_eq_norm, LinearMap.lsum_apply, Pi.sub_apply, LinearMap.sum_apply,
LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.proj_apply, LinearMap.smulRight_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, ←
Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, ← sub_smul, NNReal.coe_sum, coe_nnnorm, Finset.sum_mul]
refine norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun i _ => ?_
rw [norm_smul, mul_comm]
gcongr
exact norm_le_pi_norm (v - u) i
#align linear_independent.eventually LinearIndependent.eventually
theorem isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
IsOpen { f : ι → E | LinearIndependent 𝕜 f } :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun _ => LinearIndependent.eventually
#align is_open_set_of_linear_independent isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent
theorem isOpen_setOf_nat_le_rank (n : ℕ) :
IsOpen { f : E →L[𝕜] F | ↑n ≤ (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).rank } := by
simp only [LinearMap.le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent_finset, setOf_exists, ← exists_prop]
refine isOpen_biUnion fun t _ => ?_
have : Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] F => fun x : (t : Set E) => f x :=
continuous_pi fun x => (ContinuousLinearMap.apply 𝕜 F (x : E)).continuous
exact isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent.preimage this
#align is_open_set_of_nat_le_rank isOpen_setOf_nat_le_rank
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/FiniteDimension.lean | 296 | 312 | theorem Basis.opNNNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) {u : E →L[𝕜] F} (M : ℝ≥0)
(hu : ∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖₊ ≤ M) : ‖u‖₊ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * M :=
u.opNNNorm_le_bound _ fun e => by
set φ := v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap
calc
‖u e‖₊ = ‖u (∑ i, v.equivFun e i • v i)‖₊ := by | rw [v.sum_equivFun]
_ = ‖∑ i, v.equivFun e i • (u <| v i)‖₊ := by simp [map_sum, LinearMap.map_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i • (u <| v i)‖₊ := nnnorm_sum_le _ _
_ = ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ * ‖u (v i)‖₊ := by simp only [nnnorm_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ * M := by gcongr; apply hu
_ = (∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊) * M := by rw [Finset.sum_mul]
_ ≤ Fintype.card ι • (‖φ‖₊ * ‖e‖₊) * M := by
gcongr
calc
∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖φ e‖₊ := Pi.sum_nnnorm_apply_le_nnnorm _
_ ≤ Fintype.card ι • (‖φ‖₊ * ‖e‖₊) := nsmul_le_nsmul_right (φ.le_opNNNorm e) _
_ = Fintype.card ι • ‖φ‖₊ * M * ‖e‖₊ := by simp only [smul_mul_assoc, mul_right_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Isabel Longbottom, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
#align_import set_theory.game.pgame from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8900d545017cd21961daa2a1734bb658ef52c618"
/-!
# Combinatorial (pre-)games.
The basic theory of combinatorial games, following Conway's book `On Numbers and Games`. We
construct "pregames", define an ordering and arithmetic operations on them, then show that the
operations descend to "games", defined via the equivalence relation `p ≈ q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ q ≤ p`.
The surreal numbers will be built as a quotient of a subtype of pregames.
A pregame (`SetTheory.PGame` below) is axiomatised via an inductive type, whose sole constructor
takes two types (thought of as indexing the possible moves for the players Left and Right), and a
pair of functions out of these types to `SetTheory.PGame` (thought of as describing the resulting
game after making a move).
Combinatorial games themselves, as a quotient of pregames, are constructed in `Game.lean`.
## Conway induction
By construction, the induction principle for pregames is exactly "Conway induction". That is, to
prove some predicate `SetTheory.PGame → Prop` holds for all pregames, it suffices to prove
that for every pregame `g`, if the predicate holds for every game resulting from making a move,
then it also holds for `g`.
While it is often convenient to work "by induction" on pregames, in some situations this becomes
awkward, so we also define accessor functions `SetTheory.PGame.LeftMoves`,
`SetTheory.PGame.RightMoves`, `SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft` and `SetTheory.PGame.moveRight`.
There is a relation `PGame.Subsequent p q`, saying that
`p` can be reached by playing some non-empty sequence of moves starting from `q`, an instance
`WellFounded Subsequent`, and a local tactic `pgame_wf_tac` which is helpful for discharging proof
obligations in inductive proofs relying on this relation.
## Order properties
Pregames have both a `≤` and a `<` relation, satisfying the usual properties of a `Preorder`. The
relation `0 < x` means that `x` can always be won by Left, while `0 ≤ x` means that `x` can be won
by Left as the second player.
It turns out to be quite convenient to define various relations on top of these. We define the "less
or fuzzy" relation `x ⧏ y` as `¬ y ≤ x`, the equivalence relation `x ≈ y` as `x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x`, and
the fuzzy relation `x ‖ y` as `x ⧏ y ∧ y ⧏ x`. If `0 ⧏ x`, then `x` can be won by Left as the
first player. If `x ≈ 0`, then `x` can be won by the second player. If `x ‖ 0`, then `x` can be won
by the first player.
Statements like `zero_le_lf`, `zero_lf_le`, etc. unfold these definitions. The theorems `le_def` and
`lf_def` give a recursive characterisation of each relation in terms of themselves two moves later.
The theorems `zero_le`, `zero_lf`, etc. also take into account that `0` has no moves.
Later, games will be defined as the quotient by the `≈` relation; that is to say, the
`Antisymmetrization` of `SetTheory.PGame`.
## Algebraic structures
We next turn to defining the operations necessary to make games into a commutative additive group.
Addition is defined for $x = \{xL | xR\}$ and $y = \{yL | yR\}$ by $x + y = \{xL + y, x + yL | xR +
y, x + yR\}$. Negation is defined by $\{xL | xR\} = \{-xR | -xL\}$.
The order structures interact in the expected way with addition, so we have
```
theorem le_iff_sub_nonneg {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y ↔ 0 ≤ y - x := sorry
theorem lt_iff_sub_pos {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ 0 < y - x := sorry
```
We show that these operations respect the equivalence relation, and hence descend to games. At the
level of games, these operations satisfy all the laws of a commutative group. To prove the necessary
equivalence relations at the level of pregames, we introduce the notion of a `Relabelling` of a
game, and show, for example, that there is a relabelling between `x + (y + z)` and `(x + y) + z`.
## Future work
* The theory of dominated and reversible positions, and unique normal form for short games.
* Analysis of basic domineering positions.
* Hex.
* Temperature.
* The development of surreal numbers, based on this development of combinatorial games, is still
quite incomplete.
## References
The material here is all drawn from
* [Conway, *On numbers and games*][conway2001]
An interested reader may like to formalise some of the material from
* [Andreas Blass, *A game semantics for linear logic*][MR1167694]
* [André Joyal, *Remarques sur la théorie des jeux à deux personnes*][joyal1997]
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace SetTheory
open Function Relation
-- We'd like to be able to use multi-character auto-implicits in this file.
set_option relaxedAutoImplicit true
/-! ### Pre-game moves -/
/-- The type of pre-games, before we have quotiented
by equivalence (`PGame.Setoid`). In ZFC, a combinatorial game is constructed from
two sets of combinatorial games that have been constructed at an earlier
stage. To do this in type theory, we say that a pre-game is built
inductively from two families of pre-games indexed over any type
in Type u. The resulting type `PGame.{u}` lives in `Type (u+1)`,
reflecting that it is a proper class in ZFC. -/
inductive PGame : Type (u + 1)
| mk : ∀ α β : Type u, (α → PGame) → (β → PGame) → PGame
#align pgame SetTheory.PGame
compile_inductive% PGame
namespace PGame
/-- The indexing type for allowable moves by Left. -/
def LeftMoves : PGame → Type u
| mk l _ _ _ => l
#align pgame.left_moves SetTheory.PGame.LeftMoves
/-- The indexing type for allowable moves by Right. -/
def RightMoves : PGame → Type u
| mk _ r _ _ => r
#align pgame.right_moves SetTheory.PGame.RightMoves
/-- The new game after Left makes an allowed move. -/
def moveLeft : ∀ g : PGame, LeftMoves g → PGame
| mk _l _ L _ => L
#align pgame.move_left SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft
/-- The new game after Right makes an allowed move. -/
def moveRight : ∀ g : PGame, RightMoves g → PGame
| mk _ _r _ R => R
#align pgame.move_right SetTheory.PGame.moveRight
@[simp]
theorem leftMoves_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).LeftMoves = xl :=
rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_mk SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_mk
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).moveLeft = xL :=
rfl
#align pgame.move_left_mk SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_mk
@[simp]
theorem rightMoves_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).RightMoves = xr :=
rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_mk SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_mk
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).moveRight = xR :=
rfl
#align pgame.move_right_mk SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_mk
-- TODO define this at the level of games, as well, and perhaps also for finsets of games.
/-- Construct a pre-game from list of pre-games describing the available moves for Left and Right.
-/
def ofLists (L R : List PGame.{u}) : PGame.{u} :=
mk (ULift (Fin L.length)) (ULift (Fin R.length)) (fun i => L.get i.down) fun j ↦ R.get j.down
#align pgame.of_lists SetTheory.PGame.ofLists
theorem leftMoves_ofLists (L R : List PGame) : (ofLists L R).LeftMoves = ULift (Fin L.length) :=
rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_ofLists
theorem rightMoves_ofLists (L R : List PGame) : (ofLists L R).RightMoves = ULift (Fin R.length) :=
rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_ofLists
/-- Converts a number into a left move for `ofLists`. -/
def toOfListsLeftMoves {L R : List PGame} : Fin L.length ≃ (ofLists L R).LeftMoves :=
((Equiv.cast (leftMoves_ofLists L R).symm).trans Equiv.ulift).symm
#align pgame.to_of_lists_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.toOfListsLeftMoves
/-- Converts a number into a right move for `ofLists`. -/
def toOfListsRightMoves {L R : List PGame} : Fin R.length ≃ (ofLists L R).RightMoves :=
((Equiv.cast (rightMoves_ofLists L R).symm).trans Equiv.ulift).symm
#align pgame.to_of_lists_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.toOfListsRightMoves
theorem ofLists_moveLeft {L R : List PGame} (i : Fin L.length) :
(ofLists L R).moveLeft (toOfListsLeftMoves i) = L.get i :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_left SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem ofLists_moveLeft' {L R : List PGame} (i : (ofLists L R).LeftMoves) :
(ofLists L R).moveLeft i = L.get (toOfListsLeftMoves.symm i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_left' SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveLeft'
theorem ofLists_moveRight {L R : List PGame} (i : Fin R.length) :
(ofLists L R).moveRight (toOfListsRightMoves i) = R.get i :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_right SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveRight
@[simp]
theorem ofLists_moveRight' {L R : List PGame} (i : (ofLists L R).RightMoves) :
(ofLists L R).moveRight i = R.get (toOfListsRightMoves.symm i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_right' SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveRight'
/-- A variant of `PGame.recOn` expressed in terms of `PGame.moveLeft` and `PGame.moveRight`.
Both this and `PGame.recOn` describe Conway induction on games. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def moveRecOn {C : PGame → Sort*} (x : PGame)
(IH : ∀ y : PGame, (∀ i, C (y.moveLeft i)) → (∀ j, C (y.moveRight j)) → C y) : C x :=
x.recOn fun yl yr yL yR => IH (mk yl yr yL yR)
#align pgame.move_rec_on SetTheory.PGame.moveRecOn
/-- `IsOption x y` means that `x` is either a left or right option for `y`. -/
@[mk_iff]
inductive IsOption : PGame → PGame → Prop
| moveLeft {x : PGame} (i : x.LeftMoves) : IsOption (x.moveLeft i) x
| moveRight {x : PGame} (i : x.RightMoves) : IsOption (x.moveRight i) x
#align pgame.is_option SetTheory.PGame.IsOption
theorem IsOption.mk_left {xl xr : Type u} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xl) :
(xL i).IsOption (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@IsOption.moveLeft (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.is_option.mk_left SetTheory.PGame.IsOption.mk_left
theorem IsOption.mk_right {xl xr : Type u} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xr) :
(xR i).IsOption (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@IsOption.moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.is_option.mk_right SetTheory.PGame.IsOption.mk_right
theorem wf_isOption : WellFounded IsOption :=
⟨fun x =>
moveRecOn x fun x IHl IHr =>
Acc.intro x fun y h => by
induction' h with _ i _ j
· exact IHl i
· exact IHr j⟩
#align pgame.wf_is_option SetTheory.PGame.wf_isOption
/-- `Subsequent x y` says that `x` can be obtained by playing some nonempty sequence of moves from
`y`. It is the transitive closure of `IsOption`. -/
def Subsequent : PGame → PGame → Prop :=
TransGen IsOption
#align pgame.subsequent SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent
instance : IsTrans _ Subsequent :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsTrans _ (TransGen _)
@[trans]
theorem Subsequent.trans {x y z} : Subsequent x y → Subsequent y z → Subsequent x z :=
TransGen.trans
#align pgame.subsequent.trans SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.trans
theorem wf_subsequent : WellFounded Subsequent :=
wf_isOption.transGen
#align pgame.wf_subsequent SetTheory.PGame.wf_subsequent
instance : WellFoundedRelation PGame :=
⟨_, wf_subsequent⟩
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.moveLeft {x : PGame} (i : x.LeftMoves) : Subsequent (x.moveLeft i) x :=
TransGen.single (IsOption.moveLeft i)
#align pgame.subsequent.move_left SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.moveRight {x : PGame} (j : x.RightMoves) : Subsequent (x.moveRight j) x :=
TransGen.single (IsOption.moveRight j)
#align pgame.subsequent.move_right SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.moveRight
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_left {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xl) :
Subsequent (xL i) (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@Subsequent.moveLeft (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.subsequent.mk_left SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.mk_left
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_right {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j : xr) :
Subsequent (xR j) (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@Subsequent.moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) j
#align pgame.subsequent.mk_right SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.mk_right
/--
Discharges proof obligations of the form `⊢ Subsequent ..` arising in termination proofs
of definitions using well-founded recursion on `PGame`.
-/
macro "pgame_wf_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic| solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 8 })
[Prod.Lex.left, Prod.Lex.right, PSigma.Lex.left, PSigma.Lex.right,
Subsequent.moveLeft, Subsequent.moveRight, Subsequent.mk_left, Subsequent.mk_right,
Subsequent.trans] )
-- Register some consequences of pgame_wf_tac as simp-lemmas for convenience
-- (which are applied by default for WF goals)
-- This is different from mk_right from the POV of the simplifier,
-- because the unifier can't solve `xr =?= RightMoves (mk xl xr xL xR)` at reducible transparency.
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_right' (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j : RightMoves (mk xl xr xL xR)) :
Subsequent (xR j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveRight_mk_left (xL : xl → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xL i).moveRight j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveRight_mk_right (xR : xr → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xR i).moveRight j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveLeft_mk_left (xL : xl → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xL i).moveLeft j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveLeft_mk_right (xR : xr → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xR i).moveLeft j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
-- Porting note: linter claims these lemmas don't simplify?
open Subsequent in attribute [nolint simpNF] mk_left mk_right mk_right'
moveRight_mk_left moveRight_mk_right moveLeft_mk_left moveLeft_mk_right
/-! ### Basic pre-games -/
/-- The pre-game `Zero` is defined by `0 = { | }`. -/
instance : Zero PGame :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, PEmpty, PEmpty.elim, PEmpty.elim⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_leftMoves : LeftMoves 0 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_leftMoves
@[simp]
theorem zero_rightMoves : RightMoves 0 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_rightMoves
instance isEmpty_zero_leftMoves : IsEmpty (LeftMoves 0) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_zero_leftMoves
instance isEmpty_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (RightMoves 0) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_zero_rightMoves
instance : Inhabited PGame :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The pre-game `One` is defined by `1 = { 0 | }`. -/
instance instOnePGame : One PGame :=
⟨⟨PUnit, PEmpty, fun _ => 0, PEmpty.elim⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_leftMoves : LeftMoves 1 = PUnit :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.one_leftMoves
@[simp]
theorem one_moveLeft (x) : moveLeft 1 x = 0 :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_move_left SetTheory.PGame.one_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem one_rightMoves : RightMoves 1 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.one_rightMoves
instance uniqueOneLeftMoves : Unique (LeftMoves 1) :=
PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniqueOneLeftMoves
instance isEmpty_one_rightMoves : IsEmpty (RightMoves 1) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_one_rightMoves
/-! ### Pre-game order relations -/
/-- The less or equal relation on pre-games.
If `0 ≤ x`, then Left can win `x` as the second player. -/
instance le : LE PGame :=
⟨Sym2.GameAdd.fix wf_isOption fun x y le =>
(∀ i, ¬le y (x.moveLeft i) (Sym2.GameAdd.snd_fst <| IsOption.moveLeft i)) ∧
∀ j, ¬le (y.moveRight j) x (Sym2.GameAdd.fst_snd <| IsOption.moveRight j)⟩
/-- The less or fuzzy relation on pre-games.
If `0 ⧏ x`, then Left can win `x` as the first player. -/
def LF (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
¬y ≤ x
#align pgame.lf SetTheory.PGame.LF
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infixl:50 " ⧏ " => PGame.LF
@[simp]
protected theorem not_le {x y : PGame} : ¬x ≤ y ↔ y ⧏ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align pgame.not_le SetTheory.PGame.not_le
@[simp]
theorem not_lf {x y : PGame} : ¬x ⧏ y ↔ y ≤ x :=
Classical.not_not
#align pgame.not_lf SetTheory.PGame.not_lf
theorem _root_.LE.le.not_gf {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y → ¬y ⧏ x :=
not_lf.2
#align has_le.le.not_gf LE.le.not_gf
theorem LF.not_ge {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y → ¬y ≤ x :=
id
#align pgame.lf.not_ge SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_ge
/-- Definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏`.
The ordering here is chosen so that `And.left` refer to moves by Left, and `And.right` refer to
moves by Right. -/
theorem le_iff_forall_lf {x y : PGame} :
x ≤ y ↔ (∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ y) ∧ ∀ j, x ⧏ y.moveRight j := by
unfold LE.le le
simp only
rw [Sym2.GameAdd.fix_eq]
rfl
#align pgame.le_iff_forall_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_iff_forall_lf
/-- Definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games built using the constructor. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk {xl xr xL xR yl yr yL yR} :
mk xl xr xL xR ≤ mk yl yr yL yR ↔ (∀ i, xL i ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR) ∧ ∀ j, mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ yR j :=
le_iff_forall_lf
#align pgame.mk_le_mk SetTheory.PGame.mk_le_mk
theorem le_of_forall_lf {x y : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ y) (h₂ : ∀ j, x ⧏ y.moveRight j) :
x ≤ y :=
le_iff_forall_lf.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align pgame.le_of_forall_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_of_forall_lf
/-- Definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games, in terms of `≤`.
The ordering here is chosen so that `or.inl` refer to moves by Left, and `or.inr` refer to
moves by Right. -/
theorem lf_iff_exists_le {x y : PGame} :
x ⧏ y ↔ (∃ i, x ≤ y.moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ y := by
rw [LF, le_iff_forall_lf, not_and_or]
simp
#align pgame.lf_iff_exists_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_iff_exists_le
/-- Definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games built using the constructor. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_lf_mk {xl xr xL xR yl yr yL yR} :
mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR ↔ (∃ i, mk xl xr xL xR ≤ yL i) ∨ ∃ j, xR j ≤ mk yl yr yL yR :=
lf_iff_exists_le
#align pgame.mk_lf_mk SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf_mk
theorem le_or_gf (x y : PGame) : x ≤ y ∨ y ⧏ x := by
rw [← PGame.not_le]
apply em
#align pgame.le_or_gf SetTheory.PGame.le_or_gf
theorem moveLeft_lf_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) (i) : x.moveLeft i ⧏ y :=
(le_iff_forall_lf.1 h).1 i
#align pgame.move_left_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_lf_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.moveLeft_lf := moveLeft_lf_of_le
#align has_le.le.move_left_lf LE.le.moveLeft_lf
theorem lf_moveRight_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) (j) : x ⧏ y.moveRight j :=
(le_iff_forall_lf.1 h).2 j
#align pgame.lf_move_right_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_moveRight_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.lf_moveRight := lf_moveRight_of_le
#align has_le.le.lf_move_right LE.le.lf_moveRight
theorem lf_of_moveRight_le {x y : PGame} {j} (h : x.moveRight j ≤ y) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_exists_le.2 <| Or.inr ⟨j, h⟩
#align pgame.lf_of_move_right_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_moveRight_le
theorem lf_of_le_moveLeft {x y : PGame} {i} (h : x ≤ y.moveLeft i) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_exists_le.2 <| Or.inl ⟨i, h⟩
#align pgame.lf_of_le_move_left SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_moveLeft
theorem lf_of_le_mk {xl xr xL xR y} : mk xl xr xL xR ≤ y → ∀ i, xL i ⧏ y :=
moveLeft_lf_of_le
#align pgame.lf_of_le_mk SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_mk
theorem lf_of_mk_le {x yl yr yL yR} : x ≤ mk yl yr yL yR → ∀ j, x ⧏ yR j :=
lf_moveRight_of_le
#align pgame.lf_of_mk_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_mk_le
theorem mk_lf_of_le {xl xr y j} (xL) {xR : xr → PGame} : xR j ≤ y → mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ y :=
@lf_of_moveRight_le (mk _ _ _ _) y j
#align pgame.mk_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf_of_le
theorem lf_mk_of_le {x yl yr} {yL : yl → PGame} (yR) {i} : x ≤ yL i → x ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR :=
@lf_of_le_moveLeft x (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.lf_mk_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_mk_of_le
/- We prove that `x ≤ y → y ≤ z → x ≤ z` inductively, by also simultaneously proving its cyclic
reorderings. This auxiliary lemma is used during said induction. -/
private theorem le_trans_aux {x y z : PGame}
(h₁ : ∀ {i}, y ≤ z → z ≤ x.moveLeft i → y ≤ x.moveLeft i)
(h₂ : ∀ {j}, z.moveRight j ≤ x → x ≤ y → z.moveRight j ≤ y) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ z :=
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => PGame.not_le.1 fun h => (h₁ hyz h).not_gf <| hxy.moveLeft_lf i)
fun j => PGame.not_le.1 fun h => (h₂ h hxy).not_gf <| hyz.lf_moveRight j
instance : Preorder PGame :=
{ PGame.le with
le_refl := fun x => by
induction' x with _ _ _ _ IHl IHr
exact
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => lf_of_le_moveLeft (IHl i)) fun i => lf_of_moveRight_le (IHr i)
le_trans := by
suffices
∀ {x y z : PGame},
(x ≤ y → y ≤ z → x ≤ z) ∧ (y ≤ z → z ≤ x → y ≤ x) ∧ (z ≤ x → x ≤ y → z ≤ y) from
fun x y z => this.1
intro x y z
induction' x with xl xr xL xR IHxl IHxr generalizing y z
induction' y with yl yr yL yR IHyl IHyr generalizing z
induction' z with zl zr zL zR IHzl IHzr
exact
⟨le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHxl i).2.1) fun {j} => (IHzr j).2.2,
le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHyl i).2.2) fun {j} => (IHxr j).1,
le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHzl i).1) fun {j} => (IHyr j).2.1⟩
lt := fun x y => x ≤ y ∧ x ⧏ y }
theorem lt_iff_le_and_lf {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ x ⧏ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align pgame.lt_iff_le_and_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_iff_le_and_lf
theorem lt_of_le_of_lf {x y : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : x ⧏ y) : x < y :=
⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align pgame.lt_of_le_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_of_le_of_lf
theorem lf_of_lt {x y : PGame} (h : x < y) : x ⧏ y :=
h.2
#align pgame.lf_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.lf := lf_of_lt
#align has_lt.lt.lf LT.lt.lf
theorem lf_irrefl (x : PGame) : ¬x ⧏ x :=
le_rfl.not_gf
#align pgame.lf_irrefl SetTheory.PGame.lf_irrefl
instance : IsIrrefl _ (· ⧏ ·) :=
⟨lf_irrefl⟩
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_le_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : y ⧏ z) : x ⧏ z := by
rw [← PGame.not_le] at h₂ ⊢
exact fun h₃ => h₂ (h₃.trans h₁)
#align pgame.lf_of_le_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_of_lf
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance : Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ⧏ ·) (· ⧏ ·) := ⟨lf_of_le_of_lf⟩
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_le {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y ≤ z) : x ⧏ z := by
rw [← PGame.not_le] at h₁ ⊢
exact fun h₃ => h₁ (h₂.trans h₃)
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_le
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance : Trans (· ⧏ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ⧏ ·) := ⟨lf_of_lf_of_le⟩
alias _root_.LE.le.trans_lf := lf_of_le_of_lf
#align has_le.le.trans_lf LE.le.trans_lf
alias LF.trans_le := lf_of_lf_of_le
#align pgame.lf.trans_le SetTheory.PGame.LF.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lt_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : y ⧏ z) : x ⧏ z :=
h₁.le.trans_lf h₂
#align pgame.lf_of_lt_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lt_of_lf
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_lt {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y < z) : x ⧏ z :=
h₁.trans_le h₂.le
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.trans_lf := lf_of_lt_of_lf
#align has_lt.lt.trans_lf LT.lt.trans_lf
alias LF.trans_lt := lf_of_lf_of_lt
#align pgame.lf.trans_lt SetTheory.PGame.LF.trans_lt
theorem moveLeft_lf {x : PGame} : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ x :=
le_rfl.moveLeft_lf
#align pgame.move_left_lf SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_lf
theorem lf_moveRight {x : PGame} : ∀ j, x ⧏ x.moveRight j :=
le_rfl.lf_moveRight
#align pgame.lf_move_right SetTheory.PGame.lf_moveRight
theorem lf_mk {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i) : xL i ⧏ mk xl xr xL xR :=
@moveLeft_lf (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.lf_mk SetTheory.PGame.lf_mk
theorem mk_lf {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j) : mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ xR j :=
@lf_moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) j
#align pgame.mk_lf SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf
/-- This special case of `PGame.le_of_forall_lf` is useful when dealing with surreals, where `<` is
preferred over `⧏`. -/
theorem le_of_forall_lt {x y : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i < y) (h₂ : ∀ j, x < y.moveRight j) :
x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => (h₁ i).lf) fun i => (h₂ i).lf
#align pgame.le_of_forall_lt SetTheory.PGame.le_of_forall_lt
/-- The definition of `x ≤ y` on pre-games, in terms of `≤` two moves later. -/
theorem le_def {x y : PGame} :
x ≤ y ↔
(∀ i, (∃ i', x.moveLeft i ≤ y.moveLeft i') ∨ ∃ j, (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j ≤ y) ∧
∀ j, (∃ i, x ≤ (y.moveRight j).moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j', x.moveRight j' ≤ y.moveRight j := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
conv =>
lhs
simp only [lf_iff_exists_le]
#align pgame.le_def SetTheory.PGame.le_def
/-- The definition of `x ⧏ y` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏` two moves later. -/
theorem lf_def {x y : PGame} :
x ⧏ y ↔
(∃ i, (∀ i', x.moveLeft i' ⧏ y.moveLeft i) ∧ ∀ j, x ⧏ (y.moveLeft i).moveRight j) ∨
∃ j, (∀ i, (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i ⧏ y) ∧ ∀ j', x.moveRight j ⧏ y.moveRight j' := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
conv =>
lhs
simp only [le_iff_forall_lf]
#align pgame.lf_def SetTheory.PGame.lf_def
/-- The definition of `0 ≤ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ⧏`. -/
theorem zero_le_lf {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ x ↔ ∀ j, 0 ⧏ x.moveRight j := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
simp
#align pgame.zero_le_lf SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_lf
/-- The definition of `x ≤ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏ 0`. -/
theorem le_zero_lf {x : PGame} : x ≤ 0 ↔ ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ 0 := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
simp
#align pgame.le_zero_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_zero_lf
/-- The definition of `0 ⧏ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ≤`. -/
theorem zero_lf_le {x : PGame} : 0 ⧏ x ↔ ∃ i, 0 ≤ x.moveLeft i := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
simp
#align pgame.zero_lf_le SetTheory.PGame.zero_lf_le
/-- The definition of `x ⧏ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `≤ 0`. -/
theorem lf_zero_le {x : PGame} : x ⧏ 0 ↔ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ 0 := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
simp
#align pgame.lf_zero_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_zero_le
/-- The definition of `0 ≤ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ≤` two moves later. -/
theorem zero_le {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ x ↔ ∀ j, ∃ i, 0 ≤ (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i := by
rw [le_def]
simp
#align pgame.zero_le SetTheory.PGame.zero_le
/-- The definition of `x ≤ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `≤ 0` two moves later. -/
theorem le_zero {x : PGame} : x ≤ 0 ↔ ∀ i, ∃ j, (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j ≤ 0 := by
rw [le_def]
simp
#align pgame.le_zero SetTheory.PGame.le_zero
/-- The definition of `0 ⧏ x` on pre-games, in terms of `0 ⧏` two moves later. -/
theorem zero_lf {x : PGame} : 0 ⧏ x ↔ ∃ i, ∀ j, 0 ⧏ (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j := by
rw [lf_def]
simp
#align pgame.zero_lf SetTheory.PGame.zero_lf
/-- The definition of `x ⧏ 0` on pre-games, in terms of `⧏ 0` two moves later. -/
theorem lf_zero {x : PGame} : x ⧏ 0 ↔ ∃ j, ∀ i, (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i ⧏ 0 := by
rw [lf_def]
simp
#align pgame.lf_zero SetTheory.PGame.lf_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_le_of_isEmpty_rightMoves (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.RightMoves] : 0 ≤ x :=
zero_le.2 isEmptyElim
#align pgame.zero_le_of_is_empty_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_of_isEmpty_rightMoves
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_of_isEmpty_leftMoves (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.LeftMoves] : x ≤ 0 :=
le_zero.2 isEmptyElim
#align pgame.le_zero_of_is_empty_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.le_zero_of_isEmpty_leftMoves
/-- Given a game won by the right player when they play second, provide a response to any move by
left. -/
noncomputable def rightResponse {x : PGame} (h : x ≤ 0) (i : x.LeftMoves) :
(x.moveLeft i).RightMoves :=
Classical.choose <| (le_zero.1 h) i
#align pgame.right_response SetTheory.PGame.rightResponse
/-- Show that the response for right provided by `rightResponse` preserves the right-player-wins
condition. -/
theorem rightResponse_spec {x : PGame} (h : x ≤ 0) (i : x.LeftMoves) :
(x.moveLeft i).moveRight (rightResponse h i) ≤ 0 :=
Classical.choose_spec <| (le_zero.1 h) i
#align pgame.right_response_spec SetTheory.PGame.rightResponse_spec
/-- Given a game won by the left player when they play second, provide a response to any move by
right. -/
noncomputable def leftResponse {x : PGame} (h : 0 ≤ x) (j : x.RightMoves) :
(x.moveRight j).LeftMoves :=
Classical.choose <| (zero_le.1 h) j
#align pgame.left_response SetTheory.PGame.leftResponse
/-- Show that the response for left provided by `leftResponse` preserves the left-player-wins
condition. -/
theorem leftResponse_spec {x : PGame} (h : 0 ≤ x) (j : x.RightMoves) :
0 ≤ (x.moveRight j).moveLeft (leftResponse h j) :=
Classical.choose_spec <| (zero_le.1 h) j
#align pgame.left_response_spec SetTheory.PGame.leftResponse_spec
#noalign pgame.upper_bound
#noalign pgame.upper_bound_right_moves_empty
#noalign pgame.le_upper_bound
#noalign pgame.upper_bound_mem_upper_bounds
/-- A small family of pre-games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_range_of_small [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → PGame.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) := by
let x : PGame.{u} := ⟨Σ i, (f $ (equivShrink.{u} ι).symm i).LeftMoves, PEmpty,
fun x ↦ moveLeft _ x.2, PEmpty.elim⟩
refine ⟨x, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← (equivShrink ι).symm_apply_apply i, le_iff_forall_lf]
simpa [x] using fun j ↦ @moveLeft_lf x ⟨equivShrink ι i, j⟩
/-- A small set of pre-games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_of_small (s : Set PGame.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s := by
simpa using bddAbove_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → PGame.{u})
#align pgame.bdd_above_of_small SetTheory.PGame.bddAbove_of_small
#noalign pgame.lower_bound
#noalign pgame.lower_bound_left_moves_empty
#noalign pgame.lower_bound_le
#noalign pgame.lower_bound_mem_lower_bounds
/-- A small family of pre-games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_range_of_small [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → PGame.{u}) : BddBelow (Set.range f) := by
let x : PGame.{u} := ⟨PEmpty, Σ i, (f $ (equivShrink.{u} ι).symm i).RightMoves, PEmpty.elim,
fun x ↦ moveRight _ x.2⟩
refine ⟨x, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← (equivShrink ι).symm_apply_apply i, le_iff_forall_lf]
simpa [x] using fun j ↦ @lf_moveRight x ⟨equivShrink ι i, j⟩
/-- A small set of pre-games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_of_small (s : Set PGame.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddBelow s := by
simpa using bddBelow_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → PGame.{u})
#align pgame.bdd_below_of_small SetTheory.PGame.bddBelow_of_small
/-- The equivalence relation on pre-games. Two pre-games `x`, `y` are equivalent if `x ≤ y` and
`y ≤ x`.
If `x ≈ 0`, then the second player can always win `x`. -/
def Equiv (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x
#align pgame.equiv SetTheory.PGame.Equiv
-- Porting note: deleted the scoped notation due to notation overloading with the setoid
-- instance and this causes the PGame.equiv docstring to not show up on hover.
instance : IsEquiv _ PGame.Equiv where
refl _ := ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨xy, yx⟩ ⟨yz, zy⟩ => ⟨xy.trans yz, zy.trans yx⟩
symm _ _ := And.symm
-- Porting note: moved the setoid instance from Basic.lean to here
instance setoid : Setoid PGame :=
⟨Equiv, refl, symm, Trans.trans⟩
#align pgame.setoid SetTheory.PGame.setoid
theorem Equiv.le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≈ y) : x ≤ y :=
h.1
#align pgame.equiv.le SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.le
theorem Equiv.ge {x y : PGame} (h : x ≈ y) : y ≤ x :=
h.2
#align pgame.equiv.ge SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.ge
@[refl, simp]
theorem equiv_rfl {x : PGame} : x ≈ x :=
refl x
#align pgame.equiv_rfl SetTheory.PGame.equiv_rfl
theorem equiv_refl (x : PGame) : x ≈ x :=
refl x
#align pgame.equiv_refl SetTheory.PGame.equiv_refl
@[symm]
protected theorem Equiv.symm {x y : PGame} : (x ≈ y) → (y ≈ x) :=
symm
#align pgame.equiv.symm SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem Equiv.trans {x y z : PGame} : (x ≈ y) → (y ≈ z) → (x ≈ z) :=
_root_.trans
#align pgame.equiv.trans SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_comm {x y : PGame} : (x ≈ y) ↔ (y ≈ x) :=
comm
#align pgame.equiv_comm SetTheory.PGame.equiv_comm
theorem equiv_of_eq {x y : PGame} (h : x = y) : x ≈ y := by subst h; rfl
#align pgame.equiv_of_eq SetTheory.PGame.equiv_of_eq
@[trans]
theorem le_of_le_of_equiv {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : y ≈ z) : x ≤ z :=
h₁.trans h₂.1
#align pgame.le_of_le_of_equiv SetTheory.PGame.le_of_le_of_equiv
instance : Trans
((· ≤ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· ≈ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· ≤ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop) where
trans := le_of_le_of_equiv
@[trans]
theorem le_of_equiv_of_le {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≈ y) : y ≤ z → x ≤ z :=
h₁.1.trans
#align pgame.le_of_equiv_of_le SetTheory.PGame.le_of_equiv_of_le
instance : Trans
((· ≈ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· ≤ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· ≤ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop) where
trans := le_of_equiv_of_le
theorem LF.not_equiv {x y : PGame} (h : x ⧏ y) : ¬(x ≈ y) := fun h' => h.not_ge h'.2
#align pgame.lf.not_equiv SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_equiv
theorem LF.not_equiv' {x y : PGame} (h : x ⧏ y) : ¬(y ≈ x) := fun h' => h.not_ge h'.1
#align pgame.lf.not_equiv' SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_equiv'
theorem LF.not_gt {x y : PGame} (h : x ⧏ y) : ¬y < x := fun h' => h.not_ge h'.le
#align pgame.lf.not_gt SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_gt
theorem le_congr_imp {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) (h : x₁ ≤ y₁) : x₂ ≤ y₂ :=
hx.2.trans (h.trans hy.1)
#align pgame.le_congr_imp SetTheory.PGame.le_congr_imp
theorem le_congr {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ≤ y₁ ↔ x₂ ≤ y₂ :=
⟨le_congr_imp hx hy, le_congr_imp (Equiv.symm hx) (Equiv.symm hy)⟩
#align pgame.le_congr SetTheory.PGame.le_congr
theorem le_congr_left {x₁ x₂ y : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ ≤ y ↔ x₂ ≤ y :=
le_congr hx equiv_rfl
#align pgame.le_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.le_congr_left
theorem le_congr_right {x y₁ y₂ : PGame} (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x ≤ y₁ ↔ x ≤ y₂ :=
le_congr equiv_rfl hy
#align pgame.le_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.le_congr_right
theorem lf_congr {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ⧏ y₁ ↔ x₂ ⧏ y₂ :=
PGame.not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr (le_congr hy hx)).trans PGame.not_le
#align pgame.lf_congr SetTheory.PGame.lf_congr
theorem lf_congr_imp {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ⧏ y₁ → x₂ ⧏ y₂ :=
(lf_congr hx hy).1
#align pgame.lf_congr_imp SetTheory.PGame.lf_congr_imp
theorem lf_congr_left {x₁ x₂ y : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ ⧏ y ↔ x₂ ⧏ y :=
lf_congr hx equiv_rfl
#align pgame.lf_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.lf_congr_left
theorem lf_congr_right {x y₁ y₂ : PGame} (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x ⧏ y₁ ↔ x ⧏ y₂ :=
lf_congr equiv_rfl hy
#align pgame.lf_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.lf_congr_right
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_equiv {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y ≈ z) : x ⧏ z :=
lf_congr_imp equiv_rfl h₂ h₁
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_equiv SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_equiv
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_equiv_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≈ y) : y ⧏ z → x ⧏ z :=
lf_congr_imp (Equiv.symm h₁) equiv_rfl
#align pgame.lf_of_equiv_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_equiv_of_lf
@[trans]
theorem lt_of_lt_of_equiv {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : y ≈ z) : x < z :=
h₁.trans_le h₂.1
#align pgame.lt_of_lt_of_equiv SetTheory.PGame.lt_of_lt_of_equiv
@[trans]
theorem lt_of_equiv_of_lt {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≈ y) : y < z → x < z :=
h₁.1.trans_lt
#align pgame.lt_of_equiv_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lt_of_equiv_of_lt
instance : Trans
((· ≈ ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· < ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop)
((· < ·) : PGame → PGame → Prop) where
trans := lt_of_equiv_of_lt
theorem lt_congr_imp {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) (h : x₁ < y₁) : x₂ < y₂ :=
hx.2.trans_lt (h.trans_le hy.1)
#align pgame.lt_congr_imp SetTheory.PGame.lt_congr_imp
theorem lt_congr {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ < y₁ ↔ x₂ < y₂ :=
⟨lt_congr_imp hx hy, lt_congr_imp (Equiv.symm hx) (Equiv.symm hy)⟩
#align pgame.lt_congr SetTheory.PGame.lt_congr
theorem lt_congr_left {x₁ x₂ y : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ < y ↔ x₂ < y :=
lt_congr hx equiv_rfl
#align pgame.lt_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.lt_congr_left
theorem lt_congr_right {x y₁ y₂ : PGame} (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x < y₁ ↔ x < y₂ :=
lt_congr equiv_rfl hy
#align pgame.lt_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.lt_congr_right
theorem lt_or_equiv_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) : x < y ∨ (x ≈ y) :=
and_or_left.mp ⟨h, (em <| y ≤ x).symm.imp_left PGame.not_le.1⟩
#align pgame.lt_or_equiv_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lt_or_equiv_of_le
theorem lf_or_equiv_or_gf (x y : PGame) : x ⧏ y ∨ (x ≈ y) ∨ y ⧏ x := by
by_cases h : x ⧏ y
· exact Or.inl h
· right
cases' lt_or_equiv_of_le (PGame.not_lf.1 h) with h' h'
· exact Or.inr h'.lf
· exact Or.inl (Equiv.symm h')
#align pgame.lf_or_equiv_or_gf SetTheory.PGame.lf_or_equiv_or_gf
theorem equiv_congr_left {y₁ y₂ : PGame} : (y₁ ≈ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁, (x₁ ≈ y₁) ↔ (x₁ ≈ y₂) :=
⟨fun h _ => ⟨fun h' => Equiv.trans h' h, fun h' => Equiv.trans h' (Equiv.symm h)⟩,
fun h => (h y₁).1 <| equiv_rfl⟩
#align pgame.equiv_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.equiv_congr_left
theorem equiv_congr_right {x₁ x₂ : PGame} : (x₁ ≈ x₂) ↔ ∀ y₁, (x₁ ≈ y₁) ↔ (x₂ ≈ y₁) :=
⟨fun h _ => ⟨fun h' => Equiv.trans (Equiv.symm h) h', fun h' => Equiv.trans h h'⟩,
fun h => (h x₂).2 <| equiv_rfl⟩
#align pgame.equiv_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.equiv_congr_right
theorem equiv_of_mk_equiv {x y : PGame} (L : x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves)
(R : x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves) (hl : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ≈ y.moveLeft (L i))
(hr : ∀ j, x.moveRight j ≈ y.moveRight (R j)) : x ≈ y := by
constructor <;> rw [le_def]
· exact ⟨fun i => Or.inl ⟨_, (hl i).1⟩, fun j => Or.inr ⟨_, by simpa using (hr (R.symm j)).1⟩⟩
· exact ⟨fun i => Or.inl ⟨_, by simpa using (hl (L.symm i)).2⟩, fun j => Or.inr ⟨_, (hr j).2⟩⟩
#align pgame.equiv_of_mk_equiv SetTheory.PGame.equiv_of_mk_equiv
/-- The fuzzy, confused, or incomparable relation on pre-games.
If `x ‖ 0`, then the first player can always win `x`. -/
def Fuzzy (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
x ⧏ y ∧ y ⧏ x
#align pgame.fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infixl:50 " ‖ " => PGame.Fuzzy
@[symm]
theorem Fuzzy.swap {x y : PGame} : x ‖ y → y ‖ x :=
And.symm
#align pgame.fuzzy.swap SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.swap
instance : IsSymm _ (· ‖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Fuzzy.swap⟩
theorem Fuzzy.swap_iff {x y : PGame} : x ‖ y ↔ y ‖ x :=
⟨Fuzzy.swap, Fuzzy.swap⟩
#align pgame.fuzzy.swap_iff SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.swap_iff
theorem fuzzy_irrefl (x : PGame) : ¬x ‖ x := fun h => lf_irrefl x h.1
#align pgame.fuzzy_irrefl SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_irrefl
instance : IsIrrefl _ (· ‖ ·) :=
⟨fuzzy_irrefl⟩
theorem lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y ↔ x < y ∨ x ‖ y := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_lf, Fuzzy, ← PGame.not_le]
tauto
#align pgame.lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy
theorem lf_of_fuzzy {x y : PGame} (h : x ‖ y) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy.2 (Or.inr h)
#align pgame.lf_of_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_fuzzy
alias Fuzzy.lf := lf_of_fuzzy
#align pgame.fuzzy.lf SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.lf
theorem lt_or_fuzzy_of_lf {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y → x < y ∨ x ‖ y :=
lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy.1
#align pgame.lt_or_fuzzy_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_or_fuzzy_of_lf
theorem Fuzzy.not_equiv {x y : PGame} (h : x ‖ y) : ¬(x ≈ y) := fun h' => h'.1.not_gf h.2
#align pgame.fuzzy.not_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.not_equiv
theorem Fuzzy.not_equiv' {x y : PGame} (h : x ‖ y) : ¬(y ≈ x) := fun h' => h'.2.not_gf h.2
#align pgame.fuzzy.not_equiv' SetTheory.PGame.Fuzzy.not_equiv'
theorem not_fuzzy_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) : ¬x ‖ y := fun h' => h'.2.not_ge h
#align pgame.not_fuzzy_of_le SetTheory.PGame.not_fuzzy_of_le
theorem not_fuzzy_of_ge {x y : PGame} (h : y ≤ x) : ¬x ‖ y := fun h' => h'.1.not_ge h
#align pgame.not_fuzzy_of_ge SetTheory.PGame.not_fuzzy_of_ge
theorem Equiv.not_fuzzy {x y : PGame} (h : x ≈ y) : ¬x ‖ y :=
not_fuzzy_of_le h.1
#align pgame.equiv.not_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.not_fuzzy
theorem Equiv.not_fuzzy' {x y : PGame} (h : x ≈ y) : ¬y ‖ x :=
not_fuzzy_of_le h.2
#align pgame.equiv.not_fuzzy' SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.not_fuzzy'
theorem fuzzy_congr {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ‖ y₁ ↔ x₂ ‖ y₂ :=
show _ ∧ _ ↔ _ ∧ _ by rw [lf_congr hx hy, lf_congr hy hx]
#align pgame.fuzzy_congr SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_congr
theorem fuzzy_congr_imp {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ ‖ y₁ → x₂ ‖ y₂ :=
(fuzzy_congr hx hy).1
#align pgame.fuzzy_congr_imp SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_congr_imp
theorem fuzzy_congr_left {x₁ x₂ y : PGame} (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ ‖ y ↔ x₂ ‖ y :=
fuzzy_congr hx equiv_rfl
#align pgame.fuzzy_congr_left SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_congr_left
theorem fuzzy_congr_right {x y₁ y₂ : PGame} (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x ‖ y₁ ↔ x ‖ y₂ :=
fuzzy_congr equiv_rfl hy
#align pgame.fuzzy_congr_right SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_congr_right
@[trans]
theorem fuzzy_of_fuzzy_of_equiv {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ‖ y) (h₂ : y ≈ z) : x ‖ z :=
(fuzzy_congr_right h₂).1 h₁
#align pgame.fuzzy_of_fuzzy_of_equiv SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_of_fuzzy_of_equiv
@[trans]
theorem fuzzy_of_equiv_of_fuzzy {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≈ y) (h₂ : y ‖ z) : x ‖ z :=
(fuzzy_congr_left h₁).2 h₂
#align pgame.fuzzy_of_equiv_of_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.fuzzy_of_equiv_of_fuzzy
/-- Exactly one of the following is true (although we don't prove this here). -/
theorem lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy (x y : PGame) : x < y ∨ (x ≈ y) ∨ y < x ∨ x ‖ y := by
cases' le_or_gf x y with h₁ h₁ <;> cases' le_or_gf y x with h₂ h₂
· right
left
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
· left
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
· right
right
left
exact ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
· right
right
right
exact ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align pgame.lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy SetTheory.PGame.lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy
theorem lt_or_equiv_or_gf (x y : PGame) : x < y ∨ (x ≈ y) ∨ y ⧏ x := by
rw [lf_iff_lt_or_fuzzy, Fuzzy.swap_iff]
exact lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy x y
#align pgame.lt_or_equiv_or_gf SetTheory.PGame.lt_or_equiv_or_gf
/-! ### Relabellings -/
/-- `Relabelling x y` says that `x` and `y` are really the same game, just dressed up differently.
Specifically, there is a bijection between the moves for Left in `x` and in `y`, and similarly
for Right, and under these bijections we inductively have `Relabelling`s for the consequent games.
-/
inductive Relabelling : PGame.{u} → PGame.{u} → Type (u + 1)
|
mk :
∀ {x y : PGame} (L : x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves) (R : x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves),
(∀ i, Relabelling (x.moveLeft i) (y.moveLeft (L i))) →
(∀ j, Relabelling (x.moveRight j) (y.moveRight (R j))) → Relabelling x y
#align pgame.relabelling SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infixl:50 " ≡r " => PGame.Relabelling
namespace Relabelling
variable {x y : PGame.{u}}
/-- A constructor for relabellings swapping the equivalences. -/
def mk' (L : y.LeftMoves ≃ x.LeftMoves) (R : y.RightMoves ≃ x.RightMoves)
(hL : ∀ i, x.moveLeft (L i) ≡r y.moveLeft i) (hR : ∀ j, x.moveRight (R j) ≡r y.moveRight j) :
x ≡r y :=
⟨L.symm, R.symm, fun i => by simpa using hL (L.symm i), fun j => by simpa using hR (R.symm j)⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.mk' SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk'
/-- The equivalence between left moves of `x` and `y` given by the relabelling. -/
def leftMovesEquiv : x ≡r y → x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves
| ⟨L,_, _,_⟩ => L
#align pgame.relabelling.left_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.leftMovesEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mk_leftMovesEquiv {x y L R hL hR} : (@Relabelling.mk x y L R hL hR).leftMovesEquiv = L :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabelling.mk_left_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk_leftMovesEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mk'_leftMovesEquiv {x y L R hL hR} :
(@Relabelling.mk' x y L R hL hR).leftMovesEquiv = L.symm :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabelling.mk'_left_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk'_leftMovesEquiv
/-- The equivalence between right moves of `x` and `y` given by the relabelling. -/
def rightMovesEquiv : x ≡r y → x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves
| ⟨_, R, _, _⟩ => R
#align pgame.relabelling.right_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.rightMovesEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mk_rightMovesEquiv {x y L R hL hR} : (@Relabelling.mk x y L R hL hR).rightMovesEquiv = R :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabelling.mk_right_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk_rightMovesEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mk'_rightMovesEquiv {x y L R hL hR} :
(@Relabelling.mk' x y L R hL hR).rightMovesEquiv = R.symm :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabelling.mk'_right_moves_equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.mk'_rightMovesEquiv
/-- A left move of `x` is a relabelling of a left move of `y`. -/
def moveLeft : ∀ (r : x ≡r y) (i : x.LeftMoves), x.moveLeft i ≡r y.moveLeft (r.leftMovesEquiv i)
| ⟨_, _, hL, _⟩ => hL
#align pgame.relabelling.move_left SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.moveLeft
/-- A left move of `y` is a relabelling of a left move of `x`. -/
def moveLeftSymm :
∀ (r : x ≡r y) (i : y.LeftMoves), x.moveLeft (r.leftMovesEquiv.symm i) ≡r y.moveLeft i
| ⟨L, R, hL, hR⟩, i => by simpa using hL (L.symm i)
#align pgame.relabelling.move_left_symm SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.moveLeftSymm
/-- A right move of `x` is a relabelling of a right move of `y`. -/
def moveRight :
∀ (r : x ≡r y) (i : x.RightMoves), x.moveRight i ≡r y.moveRight (r.rightMovesEquiv i)
| ⟨_, _, _, hR⟩ => hR
#align pgame.relabelling.move_right SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.moveRight
/-- A right move of `y` is a relabelling of a right move of `x`. -/
def moveRightSymm :
∀ (r : x ≡r y) (i : y.RightMoves), x.moveRight (r.rightMovesEquiv.symm i) ≡r y.moveRight i
| ⟨L, R, hL, hR⟩, i => by simpa using hR (R.symm i)
#align pgame.relabelling.move_right_symm SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.moveRightSymm
/-- The identity relabelling. -/
@[refl]
def refl (x : PGame) : x ≡r x :=
⟨Equiv.refl _, Equiv.refl _, fun i => refl _, fun j => refl _⟩
termination_by x
#align pgame.relabelling.refl SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.refl
instance (x : PGame) : Inhabited (x ≡r x) :=
⟨refl _⟩
/-- Flip a relabelling. -/
@[symm]
def symm : ∀ {x y : PGame}, x ≡r y → y ≡r x
| _, _, ⟨L, R, hL, hR⟩ => mk' L R (fun i => (hL i).symm) fun j => (hR j).symm
#align pgame.relabelling.symm SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.symm
theorem le {x y : PGame} (r : x ≡r y) : x ≤ y :=
le_def.2
⟨fun i => Or.inl ⟨_, (r.moveLeft i).le⟩, fun j =>
Or.inr ⟨_, (r.moveRightSymm j).le⟩⟩
termination_by x
#align pgame.relabelling.le SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.le
theorem ge {x y : PGame} (r : x ≡r y) : y ≤ x :=
r.symm.le
#align pgame.relabelling.ge SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.ge
/-- A relabelling lets us prove equivalence of games. -/
theorem equiv (r : x ≡r y) : x ≈ y :=
⟨r.le, r.ge⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.equiv SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.equiv
/-- Transitivity of relabelling. -/
@[trans]
def trans : ∀ {x y z : PGame}, x ≡r y → y ≡r z → x ≡r z
| _, _, _, ⟨L₁, R₁, hL₁, hR₁⟩, ⟨L₂, R₂, hL₂, hR₂⟩ =>
⟨L₁.trans L₂, R₁.trans R₂, fun i => (hL₁ i).trans (hL₂ _), fun j => (hR₁ j).trans (hR₂ _)⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.trans SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.trans
/-- Any game without left or right moves is a relabelling of 0. -/
def isEmpty (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.LeftMoves] [IsEmpty x.RightMoves] : x ≡r 0 :=
⟨Equiv.equivPEmpty _, Equiv.equivOfIsEmpty _ _, isEmptyElim, isEmptyElim⟩
#align pgame.relabelling.is_empty SetTheory.PGame.Relabelling.isEmpty
end Relabelling
theorem Equiv.isEmpty (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.LeftMoves] [IsEmpty x.RightMoves] : x ≈ 0 :=
(Relabelling.isEmpty x).equiv
#align pgame.equiv.is_empty SetTheory.PGame.Equiv.isEmpty
instance {x y : PGame} : Coe (x ≡r y) (x ≈ y) :=
⟨Relabelling.equiv⟩
/-- Replace the types indexing the next moves for Left and Right by equivalent types. -/
def relabel {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves) : PGame :=
⟨xl', xr', x.moveLeft ∘ el, x.moveRight ∘ er⟩
#align pgame.relabel SetTheory.PGame.relabel
@[simp]
theorem relabel_moveLeft' {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves)
(i : xl') : moveLeft (relabel el er) i = x.moveLeft (el i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabel_move_left' SetTheory.PGame.relabel_moveLeft'
theorem relabel_moveLeft {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves)
(i : x.LeftMoves) : moveLeft (relabel el er) (el.symm i) = x.moveLeft i := by simp
#align pgame.relabel_move_left SetTheory.PGame.relabel_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem relabel_moveRight' {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves)
(j : xr') : moveRight (relabel el er) j = x.moveRight (er j) :=
rfl
#align pgame.relabel_move_right' SetTheory.PGame.relabel_moveRight'
theorem relabel_moveRight {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves)
(j : x.RightMoves) : moveRight (relabel el er) (er.symm j) = x.moveRight j := by simp
#align pgame.relabel_move_right SetTheory.PGame.relabel_moveRight
/-- The game obtained by relabelling the next moves is a relabelling of the original game. -/
def relabelRelabelling {x : PGame} {xl' xr'} (el : xl' ≃ x.LeftMoves) (er : xr' ≃ x.RightMoves) :
x ≡r relabel el er :=
-- Porting note: needed to add `rfl`
Relabelling.mk' el er (fun i => by simp; rfl) (fun j => by simp; rfl)
#align pgame.relabel_relabelling SetTheory.PGame.relabelRelabelling
/-! ### Negation -/
/-- The negation of `{L | R}` is `{-R | -L}`. -/
def neg : PGame → PGame
| ⟨l, r, L, R⟩ => ⟨r, l, fun i => neg (R i), fun i => neg (L i)⟩
#align pgame.neg SetTheory.PGame.neg
instance : Neg PGame :=
⟨neg⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_def {xl xr xL xR} : -mk xl xr xL xR = mk xr xl (fun j => -xR j) fun i => -xL i :=
rfl
#align pgame.neg_def SetTheory.PGame.neg_def
instance : InvolutiveNeg PGame :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Neg PGame) with
neg_neg := fun x => by
induction' x with xl xr xL xR ihL ihR
simp_rw [neg_def, ihL, ihR] }
instance : NegZeroClass PGame :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Zero PGame), inferInstanceAs (Neg PGame) with
neg_zero := by
dsimp [Zero.zero, Neg.neg, neg]
congr <;> funext i <;> cases i }
@[simp]
theorem neg_ofLists (L R : List PGame) :
-ofLists L R = ofLists (R.map fun x => -x) (L.map fun x => -x) := by
simp only [ofLists, neg_def, List.get_map, mk.injEq, List.length_map, true_and]
constructor
all_goals
apply hfunext
· simp
· rintro ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩ ⟨⟨b, hb⟩⟩ h
have :
∀ {m n} (_ : m = n) {b : ULift (Fin m)} {c : ULift (Fin n)} (_ : HEq b c),
(b.down : ℕ) = ↑c.down := by
rintro m n rfl b c
simp only [heq_eq_eq]
rintro rfl
rfl
congr 5
exact this (List.length_map _ _).symm h
#align pgame.neg_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.neg_ofLists
theorem isOption_neg {x y : PGame} : IsOption x (-y) ↔ IsOption (-x) y := by
rw [isOption_iff, isOption_iff, or_comm]
cases y;
apply or_congr <;>
· apply exists_congr
intro
rw [neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
rfl
#align pgame.is_option_neg SetTheory.PGame.isOption_neg
@[simp]
theorem isOption_neg_neg {x y : PGame} : IsOption (-x) (-y) ↔ IsOption x y := by
rw [isOption_neg, neg_neg]
#align pgame.is_option_neg_neg SetTheory.PGame.isOption_neg_neg
theorem leftMoves_neg : ∀ x : PGame, (-x).LeftMoves = x.RightMoves
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_neg SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_neg
theorem rightMoves_neg : ∀ x : PGame, (-x).RightMoves = x.LeftMoves
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_neg SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_neg
/-- Turns a right move for `x` into a left move for `-x` and vice versa.
Even though these types are the same (not definitionally so), this is the preferred way to convert
between them. -/
def toLeftMovesNeg {x : PGame} : x.RightMoves ≃ (-x).LeftMoves :=
Equiv.cast (leftMoves_neg x).symm
#align pgame.to_left_moves_neg SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNeg
/-- Turns a left move for `x` into a right move for `-x` and vice versa.
Even though these types are the same (not definitionally so), this is the preferred way to convert
between them. -/
def toRightMovesNeg {x : PGame} : x.LeftMoves ≃ (-x).RightMoves :=
Equiv.cast (rightMoves_neg x).symm
#align pgame.to_right_moves_neg SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNeg
theorem moveLeft_neg {x : PGame} (i) : (-x).moveLeft (toLeftMovesNeg i) = -x.moveRight i := by
cases x
rfl
#align pgame.move_left_neg SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_neg
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_neg' {x : PGame} (i) : (-x).moveLeft i = -x.moveRight (toLeftMovesNeg.symm i) := by
cases x
rfl
#align pgame.move_left_neg' SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_neg'
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/PGame.lean | 1,340 | 1,342 | theorem moveRight_neg {x : PGame} (i) : (-x).moveRight (toRightMovesNeg i) = -x.moveLeft i := by |
cases x
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Julian Kuelshammer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
#align_import group_theory.exponent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"52fa514ec337dd970d71d8de8d0fd68b455a1e54"
/-!
# Exponent of a group
This file defines the exponent of a group, or more generally a monoid. For a group `G` it is defined
to be the minimal `n≥1` such that `g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`. For a finite group `G`,
it is equal to the lowest common multiple of the order of all elements of the group `G`.
## Main definitions
* `Monoid.ExponentExists` is a predicate on a monoid `G` saying that there is some positive `n`
such that `g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`.
* `Monoid.exponent` defines the exponent of a monoid `G` as the minimal positive `n` such that
`g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`, by convention it is `0` if no such `n` exists.
* `AddMonoid.ExponentExists` the additive version of `Monoid.ExponentExists`.
* `AddMonoid.exponent` the additive version of `Monoid.exponent`.
## Main results
* `Monoid.lcm_order_eq_exponent`: For a finite left cancel monoid `G`, the exponent is equal to the
`Finset.lcm` of the order of its elements.
* `Monoid.exponent_eq_iSup_orderOf(')`: For a commutative cancel monoid, the exponent is
equal to `⨆ g : G, orderOf g` (or zero if it has any order-zero elements).
* `Monoid.exponent_pi` and `Monoid.exponent_prod`: The exponent of a finite product of monoids is
the least common multiple (`Finset.lcm` and `lcm`, respectively) of the exponents of the
constituent monoids.
* `MonoidHom.exponent_dvd`: If `f : M₁ →⋆ M₂` is surjective, then the exponent of `M₂` divides the
exponent of `M₁`.
## TODO
* Refactor the characteristic of a ring to be the exponent of its underlying additive group.
-/
universe u
variable {G : Type u}
open scoped Classical
namespace Monoid
section Monoid
variable (G) [Monoid G]
/-- A predicate on a monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such that `g ^ n = 1`
for all `g`. -/
@[to_additive
"A predicate on an additive monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such\n
that `n • g = 0` for all `g`."]
def ExponentExists :=
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1
#align monoid.exponent_exists Monoid.ExponentExists
#align add_monoid.exponent_exists AddMonoid.ExponentExists
/-- The exponent of a group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that `g ^ n = 1` for all
`g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"The exponent of an additive group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that\n
`n • g = 0` for all `g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention."]
noncomputable def exponent :=
if h : ExponentExists G then Nat.find h else 0
#align monoid.exponent Monoid.exponent
#align add_monoid.exponent AddMonoid.exponent
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoid.exponent_additive :
AddMonoid.exponent (Additive G) = exponent G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem exponent_multiplicative {G : Type*} [AddMonoid G] :
exponent (Multiplicative G) = AddMonoid.exponent G := rfl
open MulOpposite in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.MulOpposite.exponent : exponent (MulOpposite G) = exponent G := by
simp only [Monoid.exponent, ExponentExists]
congr!
all_goals exact ⟨(op_injective <| · <| op ·), (unop_injective <| · <| unop ·)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.isOfFinOrder (h : ExponentExists G) {g : G} : IsOfFinOrder g :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by peel 2 h; exact this g
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.orderOf_pos (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : 0 < orderOf g :=
h.isOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_ne_zero : exponent G ≠ 0 ↔ ExponentExists G := by
rw [exponent]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, @not_lt_zero' ℕ]
--if this isn't done this way, `to_additive` freaks
· tauto
#align monoid.exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero Monoid.exponent_ne_zero
#align add_monoid.exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero AddMonoid.exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_ne_zero⟩ := exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-27"))]
theorem exponentExists_iff_ne_zero : ExponentExists G ↔ exponent G ≠ 0 := exponent_ne_zero.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos : 0 < exponent G ↔ ExponentExists G :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_pos⟩ := exponent_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff : exponent G = 0 ↔ ¬ExponentExists G :=
exponent_ne_zero.not_right
#align monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff Monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff
#align add_monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff AddMonoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero {g : G} (hg : orderOf g = 0) : exponent G = 0 :=
exponent_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun h ↦ h.orderOf_pos g |>.ne' hg
#align monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero Monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero
#align add_monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero AddMonoid.exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero
/-- The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that `g ^ n ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that
`n • g ≠ 0`."]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff_forall : exponent G = 0 ↔ ∀ n > 0, ∃ g : G, g ^ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [exponent_eq_zero_iff, ExponentExists]
push_neg
rfl
@[to_additive exponent_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_exponent_eq_one (g : G) : g ^ exponent G = 1 := by
by_cases h : ExponentExists G
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_pos h]
exact (Nat.find_spec h).2 g
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_neg h, pow_zero]
#align monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one
#align add_monoid.exponent_nsmul_eq_zero AddMonoid.exponent_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Exponent.lean | 160 | 163 | theorem pow_eq_mod_exponent {n : ℕ} (g : G) : g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G) :=
calc
g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G + exponent G * (n / exponent G)) := by | rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = g ^ (n % exponent G) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_exponent_eq_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
#align_import measure_theory.measure.measure_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace
open scoped Classical symmDiff
open Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_is_measurably_generated MeasureTheory.ae_isMeasurablyGenerated
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
#align measure_theory.ae_uIoc_iff MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union MeasureTheory.measure_union
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union' MeasureTheory.measure_union'
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_inter_add_diff
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_diff_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter' MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter'
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union] using measure_union disjoint_sdiff_sdiff (ht.diff hs)
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_add_measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_add_measure_compl
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion₀
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion₀
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset₀
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
#align measure_theory.tsum_meas_le_meas_Union_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_null' MeasureTheory.measure_diff_null'
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) : μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union' disjoint_sdiff_right hs, union_diff_self]
#align measure_theory.measure_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_add_diff
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : MeasurableSet t) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
Eq.symm <| ENNReal.sub_eq_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff' MeasureTheory.measure_diff'
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff MeasureTheory.measure_diff
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
#align measure_theory.le_measure_diff MeasureTheory.le_measure_diff
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := (WithTop.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩).symm
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} :
μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
#align measure_theory.measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_compl
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} {t : β → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ b, s b ⊆ t b) (h_le : ∀ b, μ (t b) ≤ μ (s b)) : μ (⋃ b, s b) = μ (⋃ b, t b) := by
rcases Classical.em (∃ b, μ (t b) = ∞) with (⟨b, hb⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ b, s b) = ∞ := top_unique (hb ▸ (h_le b).trans <| measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, t b) := Eq.symm <| top_unique <| hb ▸ measure_mono (subset_iUnion _ _)
push_neg at htop
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono (iUnion_mono hsub)) ?_
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
#align measure_theory.measure_union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_union_congr_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b, s b) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _b => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _b =>
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_toMeasurable
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_toMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_to_measurable_union MeasureTheory.measure_toMeasurable_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_union_toMeasurable
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i)) (H : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily
-measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable ι
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
generalize ht : Function.extend Encodable.encode s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion,
iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective, (· ∘ ·), Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty,
measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i => measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) :=
MeasurableSet.disjointed fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) ≤ μ (⋃ n, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun i => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} : μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
have hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) (Accumulate f) := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rli ↦ le_trans rli rik,
biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rlj ↦ le_trans rlj rjk⟩
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd.directed_val, ← iSup_subtype'']
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le _ k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (MeasurableSet.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => ?_)
· rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· rw [tsub_le_iff_right, ← measure_union, Set.union_comm]
· exact measure_mono (diff_subset_iff.1 Subset.rfl)
· apply disjoint_sdiff_left
· apply h i
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
#align measure_theory.measure_Inter_eq_infi MeasureTheory.measure_iInter_eq_iInf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
let s := fun i ↦ ⋂ j ≤ i, f j
have iInter_eq : ⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i, s i := by
ext x; simp [s]; constructor
· exact fun h _ j _ ↦ h j
· intro h i
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact h j i rij
have ms : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i) :=
fun i ↦ MeasurableSet.biInter (countable_univ.mono <| subset_univ _) fun i _ ↦ h i
have hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biInter_subset_biInter_left fun j rji ↦ le_trans rji rik,
biInter_subset_biInter_left fun i rij ↦ le_trans rij rjk⟩
have hfin' : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞ := by
rcases hfin with ⟨i, hi⟩
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact ⟨j, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hi <| measure_mono <| biInter_subset_of_mem rij⟩
exact iInter_eq ▸ measure_iInter_eq_iInf ms hd hfin'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Countable ι]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hm.directed_le]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Union MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup']
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n)) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf hs hm.directed_ge hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Inter MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iInter
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ∈ {j | j ≤ i}, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf' hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, MeasurableSet (s r)) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun l hl => ?_, fun L hL => ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin (s := Ioi a)] with r hr using hl.trans_le
(measure_mono (biInter_subset_of_mem hr))
obtain ⟨u, u_anti, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ι, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, a < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, ar, _⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto' ar with ⟨w, w_anti, w_mem, w_lim⟩
exact ⟨w, w_anti, fun n => (w_mem n).1, w_lim⟩
have A : Tendsto (μ ∘ s ∘ u) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s (u n)))) := by
refine tendsto_measure_iInter (fun n => hs _ (u_pos n)) ?_ ?_
· intro m n hmn
exact hm _ _ (u_pos n) (u_anti.antitone hmn)
· rcases hf with ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 r rpos).exists
refine ⟨n, ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hr.lt_top)⟩
exact measure_mono (hm _ _ (u_pos n) hn.le)
have B : ⋂ n, s (u n) = ⋂ r > a, s r := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro r rpos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ rpos).exists
exact Subset.trans (iInter_subset _ n) (hm (u n) r (u_pos n) hn.le)
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro n
apply biInter_subset_of_mem
exact u_pos n
rw [B] at A
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, μ (s (u n)) < L := ((tendsto_order.1 A).2 _ hL).exists
have : Ioc a (u n) ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, u_pos n⟩
filter_upwards [this] with r hr using lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (hm _ _ hr.1 hr.2)) hn
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_bInter_gt MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_biInter_gt
/-- One direction of the **Borel-Cantelli lemma** (sometimes called the "*first* Borel-Cantelli
lemma"): if (sᵢ) is a sequence of sets such that `∑ μ sᵢ` is finite, then the limit superior of the
`sᵢ` is a null set.
Note: for the *second* Borel-Cantelli lemma (applying to independent sets in a probability space),
see `ProbabilityTheory.measure_limsup_eq_one`. -/
theorem measure_limsup_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (hs : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (limsup s atTop) = 0 := by
-- First we replace the sequence `sₙ` with a sequence of measurable sets `tₙ ⊇ sₙ` of the same
-- measure.
set t : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (s n)
have ht : (∑' i, μ (t i)) ≠ ∞ := by simpa only [t, measure_toMeasurable] using hs
suffices μ (limsup t atTop) = 0 by
have A : s ≤ t := fun n => subset_toMeasurable μ (s n)
-- TODO default args fail
exact measure_mono_null (limsup_le_limsup (eventually_of_forall (Pi.le_def.mp A))) this
-- Next we unfold `limsup` for sets and replace equality with an inequality
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', Set.iInf_eq_iInter, Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, ←
nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
-- Finally, we estimate `μ (⋃ i, t (i + n))` by `∑ i', μ (t (i + n))`
refine
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto'
(tendsto_measure_iInter
(fun i => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun b => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) ?_
⟨0, ne_top_of_le_ne_top ht (measure_iUnion_le t)⟩)
(ENNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add (μ ∘ t) ht) fun n => measure_iUnion_le _
intro n m hnm x
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i + (m - n), by simpa only [add_assoc, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hnm] using hi⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_limsup_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_limsup_eq_zero
theorem measure_liminf_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (liminf s atTop) = 0 := by
rw [← le_zero_iff]
have : liminf s atTop ≤ limsup s atTop := liminf_le_limsup
exact (μ.mono this).trans (by simp [measure_limsup_eq_zero h])
#align measure_theory.measure_liminf_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_liminf_eq_zero
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : limsup (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.limsup_sdiff s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_limsup s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` above because of diamond; see #19041
theorem liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : liminf (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.liminf_sdiff s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_liminf s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align measure_theory.measure_if MeasureTheory.measure_if
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory MeasureTheory.le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.to_measure_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.toMeasure_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
#align measure_theory.le_to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.le_toMeasure_apply
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply₀ MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply₀
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
#align measure_theory.to_outer_measure_to_measure MeasureTheory.toOuterMeasure_toMeasure
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
#align measure_theory.bounded_by_measure MeasureTheory.boundedBy_measure
end OuterMeasure
section
/- Porting note: These variables are wrapped by an anonymous section because they interrupt
synthesizing instances in `MeasureSpace` section. -/
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_inter MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_inter
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero [MeasurableSpace α] : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.instZero
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_zero
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.subsingleton MeasureTheory.Measure.instSubsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
#align measure_theory.measure.eq_zero_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.eq_zero_of_isEmpty
instance instInhabited [MeasurableSpace α] : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.inhabited MeasureTheory.Measure.instInhabited
instance instAdd [MeasurableSpace α] : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_add MeasureTheory.Measure.instAdd
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.add_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_add
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.add_apply
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul [MeasurableSpace α] : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_apply
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_comm_class MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_scalar_tower MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsScalarTower
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_central_scalar MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsCentralScalar
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instMulAction
instance instAddCommMonoid [MeasurableSpace α] : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.add_comm_monoid MeasureTheory.Measure.instAddCommMonoid
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add_hom MeasureTheory.Measure.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_finset_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_finset_sum
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.finset_sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.finset_sum_apply
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.distrib_mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instDistribMulAction
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.module MeasureTheory.Measure.instModule
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, smul_apply, or_iff_right_iff_imp, mul_eq_zero]
simp only [IsEmpty.forall_iff, hc]
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_smul_measure_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_smul_measure_iff
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_add_inter_left MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_add_inter_right MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder [MeasurableSpace α] : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl m s := le_rfl
le_trans m₁ m₂ m₃ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
#align measure_theory.measure.partial_order MeasureTheory.Measure.instPartialOrder
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_le MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_le
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
#align measure_theory.measure.le_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.le_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.le_iff'
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
#align measure_theory.measure.lt_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.lt_iff
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
#align measure_theory.measure.lt_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.lt_iff'
instance covariantAddLE [MeasurableSpace α] :
CovariantClass (Measure α) (Measure α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.covariant_add_le MeasureTheory.Measure.covariantAddLE
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_add_left MeasureTheory.Measure.le_add_left
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_add_right MeasureTheory.Measure.le_add_right
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
#align measure_theory.measure.Inf_caratheodory MeasureTheory.Measure.sInf_caratheodory
instance [MeasurableSpace α] : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.Inf_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.sInf_apply
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun μ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf [MeasurableSpace α] : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
#align measure_theory.measure.complete_semilattice_Inf MeasureTheory.Measure.instCompleteSemilatticeInf
instance instCompleteLattice [MeasurableSpace α] : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun μ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
#align measure_theory.measure.complete_lattice MeasureTheory.Measure.instCompleteLattice
end sInf
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure_top MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top [MeasurableSpace α] :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_top MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_top
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.top_add MeasureTheory.Measure.top_add
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_top MeasureTheory.Measure.add_top
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_le MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_ne_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_pos
/-! ### Pushforward and pullback -/
/-- Lift a linear map between `OuterMeasure` spaces such that for each measure `μ` every measurable
set is caratheodory-measurable w.r.t. `f μ` to a linear map between `Measure` spaces. -/
def liftLinear {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β)
(hf : ∀ μ : Measure α, ‹_› ≤ (f μ.toOuterMeasure).caratheodory) :
Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure β where
toFun μ := (f μ.toOuterMeasure).toMeasure (hf μ)
map_add' μ₁ μ₂ := ext fun s hs => by
simp only [map_add, coe_add, Pi.add_apply, toMeasure_apply, add_toOuterMeasure,
OuterMeasure.coe_add, hs]
map_smul' c μ := ext fun s hs => by
simp only [LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply,
toMeasure_apply, smul_toOuterMeasure (R := ℝ≥0∞), OuterMeasure.coe_smul (R := ℝ≥0∞),
smul_apply, hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.lift_linear MeasureTheory.Measure.liftLinear
lemma liftLinear_apply₀ {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) {s : Set β}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (liftLinear f hf μ)) : liftLinear f hf μ s = f μ.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply₀ _ (hf μ) hs
@[simp]
theorem liftLinear_apply {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : liftLinear f hf μ s = f μ.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply _ (hf μ) hs
#align measure_theory.measure.lift_linear_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.liftLinear_apply
theorem le_liftLinear_apply {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) (s : Set β) :
f μ.toOuterMeasure s ≤ liftLinear f hf μ s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ (hf μ) s
#align measure_theory.measure.le_lift_linear_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_liftLinear_apply
/-- The pushforward of a measure as a linear map. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not
a measurable function. -/
def mapₗ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure β :=
if hf : Measurable f then
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.map f) fun μ _s hs t =>
le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory μ _ (hf hs) (f ⁻¹' t)
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ
theorem mapₗ_congr {f g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
mapₗ f μ = mapₗ g μ := by
ext1 s hs
simpa only [mapₗ, hf, hg, hs, dif_pos, liftLinear_apply, OuterMeasure.map_apply]
using measure_congr (h.preimage s)
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_congr
/-- The pushforward of a measure. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not an almost everywhere
measurable function. -/
irreducible_def map [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) : Measure β :=
if hf : AEMeasurable f μ then mapₗ (hf.mk f) μ else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.map MeasureTheory.Measure.map
theorem mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
mapₗ (hf.mk f) μ = map f μ := by simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_mk_apply_of_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable
theorem mapₗ_apply_of_measurable {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (μ : Measure α) :
mapₗ f μ = map f μ := by
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable]
exact mapₗ_congr hf hf.aemeasurable.measurable_mk hf.aemeasurable.ae_eq_mk
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_apply_of_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_apply_of_measurable
@[simp]
theorem map_add (μ ν : Measure α) {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ + ν).map f = μ.map f + ν.map f := by simp [← mapₗ_apply_of_measurable hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_add MeasureTheory.Measure.map_add
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : (0 : Measure α).map f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f (0 : Measure α) <;> simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_of_not_aemeasurable {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ¬AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.map f = 0 := by simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_of_not_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.map_of_not_aemeasurable
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Measure.map f μ = Measure.map g μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· have hg : AEMeasurable g μ := hf.congr h
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf, ← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hg]
exact
mapₗ_congr hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk (hf.ae_eq_mk.symm.trans (h.trans hg.ae_eq_mk))
· have hg : ¬AEMeasurable g μ := by simpa [← aemeasurable_congr h] using hf
simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable, hf, hg]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.map_congr
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β) :
(c • μ).map f = c • μ.map f := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc); · simp
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· have hfc : AEMeasurable f (c • μ) :=
⟨hf.mk f, hf.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).2 hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf, ← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hfc,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply]
congr 1
apply mapₗ_congr hfc.measurable_mk hf.measurable_mk
exact EventuallyEq.trans ((ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 hfc.ae_eq_mk.symm) hf.ae_eq_mk
· have hfc : ¬AEMeasurable f (c • μ) := by
intro hfc
exact hf ⟨hfc.mk f, hfc.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 hfc.ae_eq_mk⟩
simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable hf, map_of_not_aemeasurable hfc]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.map_smul
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul_nnreal (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β) :
(c • μ).map f = c • μ.map f :=
μ.map_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) f
#align measure_theory.measure.map_smul_nnreal MeasureTheory.Measure.map_smul_nnreal
variable {f : α → β}
lemma map_apply₀ {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (map f μ)) : μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map, dif_pos hf, mapₗ, dif_pos hf.measurable_mk] at hs ⊢
rw [liftLinear_apply₀ _ hs, measure_congr (hf.ae_eq_mk.preimage s)]
rfl
/-- We can evaluate the pushforward on measurable sets. For non-measurable sets, see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.le_map_apply` and `MeasurableEquiv.map_apply`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := map_apply₀ hf hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.map_apply_of_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable
@[simp]
theorem map_apply (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) :=
map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable hs
#align measure_theory.measure.map_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.map_apply
theorem map_toOuterMeasure (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(μ.map f).toOuterMeasure = (OuterMeasure.map f μ.toOuterMeasure).trim := by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_trim_iff]
intro s hs
simp [hf, hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.map_toOuterMeasure
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_iff (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.map f = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf .univ, preimage_univ]
@[simp] lemma mapₗ_eq_zero_iff (hf : Measurable f) : Measure.mapₗ f μ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [mapₗ_apply_of_measurable hf, map_eq_zero_iff hf.aemeasurable]
lemma map_ne_zero_iff (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.map f ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 := (map_eq_zero_iff hf).not
lemma mapₗ_ne_zero_iff (hf : Measurable f) : Measure.mapₗ f μ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
(mapₗ_eq_zero_iff hf).not
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map id μ = μ :=
ext fun _ => map_apply measurable_id
#align measure_theory.measure.map_id MeasureTheory.Measure.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : map (fun x => x) μ = μ :=
map_id
#align measure_theory.measure.map_id' MeasureTheory.Measure.map_id'
theorem map_map {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ.map f).map g = μ.map (g ∘ f) :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hf, hg, hs, hg hs, hg.comp hf, ← preimage_comp]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_map MeasureTheory.Measure.map_map
@[mono]
theorem map_mono {f : α → β} (h : μ ≤ ν) (hf : Measurable f) : μ.map f ≤ ν.map f :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simp [hf.aemeasurable, hs, h _]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.map_mono
/-- Even if `s` is not measurable, we can bound `map f μ s` from below.
See also `MeasurableEquiv.map_apply`. -/
theorem le_map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (s : Set β) : μ (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ μ.map f s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ μ (f ⁻¹' toMeasurable (μ.map f) s) := by gcongr; apply subset_toMeasurable
_ = μ.map f (toMeasurable (μ.map f) s) :=
(map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf <| measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).symm
_ = μ.map f s := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_map_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_map_apply
theorem le_map_apply_image {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (s : Set α) :
μ s ≤ μ.map f (f '' s) :=
(measure_mono (subset_preimage_image f s)).trans (le_map_apply hf _)
/-- Even if `s` is not measurable, `map f μ s = 0` implies that `μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0`. -/
theorem preimage_null_of_map_null {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : μ.map f s = 0) : μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.mp <| (le_map_apply hf s).trans_eq hs
#align measure_theory.measure.preimage_null_of_map_null MeasureTheory.Measure.preimage_null_of_map_null
theorem tendsto_ae_map {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : Tendsto f (ae μ) (ae (μ.map f)) :=
fun _ hs => preimage_null_of_map_null hf hs
#align measure_theory.measure.tendsto_ae_map MeasureTheory.Measure.tendsto_ae_map
/-- Pullback of a `Measure` as a linear map. If `f` sends each measurable set to a measurable
set, then for each measurable set `s` we have `comapₗ f μ s = μ (f '' s)`.
If the linearity is not needed, please use `comap` instead, which works for a larger class of
functions. -/
def comapₗ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Measure β →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
if hf : Injective f ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s) then
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.comap f) fun μ s hs t => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.comap_apply, image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1]
apply le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
exact hf.2 s hs
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ
theorem comapₗ_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comapₗ f μ s = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [comapₗ, dif_pos, liftLinear_apply _ hs, OuterMeasure.comap_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
exact ⟨hfi, hf⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ_apply
/-- Pullback of a `Measure`. If `f` sends each measurable set to a null-measurable set,
then for each measurable set `s` we have `comap f μ s = μ (f '' s)`. -/
def comap [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) : Measure α :=
if hf : Injective f ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ then
(OuterMeasure.comap f μ.toOuterMeasure).toMeasure fun s hs t => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.comap_apply, image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1]
exact (measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ (hf.2 s hs)).symm
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.comap MeasureTheory.Measure.comap
theorem comap_apply₀ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (comap f μ)) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [comap, dif_pos (And.intro hfi hf)] at hs ⊢
rw [toMeasure_apply₀ _ _ hs, OuterMeasure.comap_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_apply₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_apply₀
theorem le_comap_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ) (s : Set α) :
μ (f '' s) ≤ comap f μ s := by
rw [comap, dif_pos (And.intro hfi hf)]
exact le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_comap_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_comap_apply
theorem comap_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
comap_apply₀ f μ hfi (fun s hs => (hf s hs).nullMeasurableSet) hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_apply
theorem comapₗ_eq_comap {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comapₗ f μ s = comap f μ s :=
(comapₗ_apply f hfi hf μ hs).trans (comap_apply f hfi hf μ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ_eq_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ_eq_comap
theorem measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
(f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ) {s : Set α} (hs : comap f μ s = 0) :
μ (f '' s) = 0 :=
le_antisymm ((le_comap_apply f μ hfi hf s).trans hs.le) (zero_le _)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
{s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᵐ[comap f μ] t) : f '' s =ᵐ[μ] f '' t := by
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff] at hst ⊢
have h_eq_α : { a : α | ¬s a = t a } = s \ t ∪ t \ s := by
ext1 x
simp only [eq_iff_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_union, mem_diff]
tauto
have h_eq_β : { a : β | ¬(f '' s) a = (f '' t) a } = f '' s \ f '' t ∪ f '' t \ f '' s := by
ext1 x
simp only [eq_iff_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_union, mem_diff]
tauto
rw [← Set.image_diff hfi, ← Set.image_diff hfi, ← Set.image_union] at h_eq_β
rw [h_eq_β]
rw [h_eq_α] at hst
exact measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero f μ hfi hf hst
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap
theorem NullMeasurableSet.image {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.comap f)) : NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ := by
refine ⟨toMeasurable μ (f '' toMeasurable (μ.comap f) s), measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _, ?_⟩
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq ?_).symm
swap
· exact hf _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
have h : toMeasurable (comap f μ) s =ᵐ[comap f μ] s :=
NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq hs
exact ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap f μ hfi hf h.symm
#align measure_theory.measure.null_measurable_set.image MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurableSet.image
theorem comap_preimage {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β)
{s : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (hf' : Measurable f)
(h : ∀ t, MeasurableSet t → NullMeasurableSet (f '' t) μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [comap_apply₀ _ _ hf h (hf' hs).nullMeasurableSet, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_preimage MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_preimage
section Sum
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
#align measure_theory.measure.sum MeasureTheory.Measure.sum
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_sum_apply
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = x₀`. For any Dirac mass
`δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure `sum δ_x`
gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any measurable set
containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one get `sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
#align measure_theory.measure.le_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.le_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply_eq_zero'
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,527 | 1,531 | theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by |
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 198 | 199 | theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by |
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Restrict
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Reflective
#align_import algebraic_geometry.Gamma_Spec_adjunction from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
/-!
# Adjunction between `Γ` and `Spec`
We define the adjunction `ΓSpec.adjunction : Γ ⊣ Spec` by defining the unit (`toΓSpec`,
in multiple steps in this file) and counit (done in `Spec.lean`) and checking that they satisfy
the left and right triangle identities. The constructions and proofs make use of
maps and lemmas defined and proved in structure_sheaf.lean extensively.
Notice that since the adjunction is between contravariant functors, you get to choose
one of the two categories to have arrows reversed, and it is equally valid to present
the adjunction as `Spec ⊣ Γ` (`Spec.to_LocallyRingedSpace.right_op ⊣ Γ`), in which
case the unit and the counit would switch to each other.
## Main definition
* `AlgebraicGeometry.identityToΓSpec` : The natural transformation `𝟭 _ ⟶ Γ ⋙ Spec`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction` : The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from
`CommRingᵒᵖ` to `LocallyRingedSpace`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction` : The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from
`CommRingᵒᵖ` to `Scheme`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve perfomance #12737
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
universe u
open PrimeSpectrum
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory
open StructureSheaf
open Spec (structureSheaf)
open TopologicalSpace
open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace
open TopCat.Presheaf
open TopCat.Presheaf.SheafCondition
namespace LocallyRingedSpace
variable (X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u})
/-- The map from the global sections to a stalk. -/
def ΓToStalk (x : X) : Γ.obj (op X) ⟶ X.presheaf.stalk x :=
X.presheaf.germ (⟨x, trivial⟩ : (⊤ : Opens X))
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_to_stalk AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.ΓToStalk
/-- The canonical map from the underlying set to the prime spectrum of `Γ(X)`. -/
def toΓSpecFun : X → PrimeSpectrum (Γ.obj (op X)) := fun x =>
comap (X.ΓToStalk x) (LocalRing.closedPoint (X.presheaf.stalk x))
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_fun AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecFun
theorem not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk (r : Γ.obj (op X)) (x : X) :
r ∉ (X.toΓSpecFun x).asIdeal ↔ IsUnit (X.ΓToStalk x r) := by
erw [LocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal, Classical.not_not]
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk
/-- The preimage of a basic open in `Spec Γ(X)` under the unit is the basic
open in `X` defined by the same element (they are equal as sets). -/
theorem toΓSpec_preim_basicOpen_eq (r : Γ.obj (op X)) :
X.toΓSpecFun ⁻¹' (basicOpen r).1 = (X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r).1 := by
ext
erw [X.toRingedSpace.mem_top_basicOpen]; apply not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_preim_basic_open_eq AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec_preim_basicOpen_eq
/-- `toΓSpecFun` is continuous. -/
theorem toΓSpec_continuous : Continuous X.toΓSpecFun := by
rw [isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens.continuous_iff]
rintro _ ⟨r, rfl⟩
erw [X.toΓSpec_preim_basicOpen_eq r]
exact (X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r).2
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_continuous AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec_continuous
/-- The canonical (bundled) continuous map from the underlying topological
space of `X` to the prime spectrum of its global sections. -/
@[simps]
def toΓSpecBase : X.toTopCat ⟶ Spec.topObj (Γ.obj (op X)) where
toFun := X.toΓSpecFun
continuous_toFun := X.toΓSpec_continuous
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_base AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecBase
-- These lemmas have always been bad (#7657), but lean4#2644 made `simp` start noticing
attribute [nolint simpNF] AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecBase_apply
variable (r : Γ.obj (op X))
/-- The preimage in `X` of a basic open in `Spec Γ(X)` (as an open set). -/
abbrev toΓSpecMapBasicOpen : Opens X :=
(Opens.map X.toΓSpecBase).obj (basicOpen r)
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_map_basic_open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen
/-- The preimage is the basic open in `X` defined by the same element `r`. -/
theorem toΓSpecMapBasicOpen_eq : X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r = X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r :=
Opens.ext (X.toΓSpec_preim_basicOpen_eq r)
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_map_basic_open_eq AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen_eq
/-- The map from the global sections `Γ(X)` to the sections on the (preimage of) a basic open. -/
abbrev toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen :
X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤) ⟶ X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r) :=
X.presheaf.map (X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r).leTop.op
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_to_Γ_Spec_map_basic_open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen
/-- `r` is a unit as a section on the basic open defined by `r`. -/
theorem isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen : IsUnit (X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r r) := by
convert
(X.presheaf.map <| (eqToHom <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen_eq r).op).isUnit_map
(X.toRingedSpace.isUnit_res_basicOpen r)
-- Porting note: `rw [comp_apply]` to `erw [comp_apply]`
erw [← comp_apply, ← Functor.map_comp]
congr
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.is_unit_res_to_Γ_Spec_map_basic_open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen
/-- Define the sheaf hom on individual basic opens for the unit. -/
def toΓSpecCApp :
(structureSheaf <| Γ.obj <| op X).val.obj (op <| basicOpen r) ⟶
X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r) :=
IsLocalization.Away.lift r (isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen _ r)
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_c_app AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecCApp
/-- Characterization of the sheaf hom on basic opens,
direction ← (next lemma) is used at various places, but → is not used in this file. -/
theorem toΓSpecCApp_iff
(f :
(structureSheaf <| Γ.obj <| op X).val.obj (op <| basicOpen r) ⟶
X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r)) :
toOpen _ (basicOpen r) ≫ f = X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r ↔ f = X.toΓSpecCApp r := by
-- Porting Note: Type class problem got stuck in `IsLocalization.Away.AwayMap.lift_comp`
-- created instance manually. This replaces the `pick_goal` tactics
have loc_inst := IsLocalization.to_basicOpen (Γ.obj (op X)) r
rw [← @IsLocalization.Away.AwayMap.lift_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r loc_inst _
(X.isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r)]
--pick_goal 5; exact is_localization.to_basic_open _ r
constructor
· intro h
exact IsLocalization.ringHom_ext (Submonoid.powers r) h
apply congr_arg
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_c_app_iff AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecCApp_iff
theorem toΓSpecCApp_spec : toOpen _ (basicOpen r) ≫ X.toΓSpecCApp r = X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r :=
(X.toΓSpecCApp_iff r _).2 rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_c_app_spec AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecCApp_spec
/-- The sheaf hom on all basic opens, commuting with restrictions. -/
@[simps app]
def toΓSpecCBasicOpens :
(inducedFunctor basicOpen).op ⋙ (structureSheaf (Γ.obj (op X))).1 ⟶
(inducedFunctor basicOpen).op ⋙ ((TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ X.toΓSpecBase).obj X.𝒪).1 where
app r := X.toΓSpecCApp r.unop
naturality r s f := by
apply (StructureSheaf.to_basicOpen_epi (Γ.obj (op X)) r.unop).1
simp only [← Category.assoc]
erw [X.toΓSpecCApp_spec r.unop]
convert X.toΓSpecCApp_spec s.unop
symm
apply X.presheaf.map_comp
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_c_basic_opens AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecCBasicOpens
/-- The canonical morphism of sheafed spaces from `X` to the spectrum of its global sections. -/
@[simps]
def toΓSpecSheafedSpace : X.toSheafedSpace ⟶ Spec.toSheafedSpace.obj (op (Γ.obj (op X))) where
base := X.toΓSpecBase
c :=
TopCat.Sheaf.restrictHomEquivHom (structureSheaf (Γ.obj (op X))).1 _ isBasis_basic_opens
X.toΓSpecCBasicOpens
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_SheafedSpace AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecSheafedSpace
-- Porting Note: Now need much more hand holding: all variables explicit, and need to tidy up
-- significantly, was `TopCat.Sheaf.extend_hom_app _ _ _ _`
theorem toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_eq :
X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace.c.app (op (basicOpen r)) = X.toΓSpecCApp r := by
have := TopCat.Sheaf.extend_hom_app (Spec.toSheafedSpace.obj (op (Γ.obj (op X)))).presheaf
((TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ X.toΓSpecBase).obj X.𝒪)
isBasis_basic_opens X.toΓSpecCBasicOpens r
dsimp at this
rw [← this]
dsimp
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_SheafedSpace_app_eq AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_eq
-- Porting note: need a helper lemma `toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec_assoc` to help compile
-- `toStalk_stalkMap_to_Γ_Spec`
@[reassoc] theorem toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec (r : Γ.obj (op X)) :
toOpen (Γ.obj (op X)) (basicOpen r) ≫ X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace.c.app (op (basicOpen r)) =
X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r :=
(X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_eq r).symm ▸ X.toΓSpecCApp_spec r
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_SheafedSpace_app_spec AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec
/-- The map on stalks induced by the unit commutes with maps from `Γ(X)` to
stalks (in `Spec Γ(X)` and in `X`). -/
theorem toStalk_stalkMap_toΓSpec (x : X) :
toStalk _ _ ≫ PresheafedSpace.stalkMap X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace x = X.ΓToStalk x := by
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap]
erw [← toOpen_germ _ (basicOpen (1 : Γ.obj (op X)))
⟨X.toΓSpecFun x, by rw [basicOpen_one]; trivial⟩]
rw [← Category.assoc, Category.assoc (toOpen _ _)]
erw [stalkFunctor_map_germ]
rw [← Category.assoc, toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec]
unfold ΓToStalk
rw [← stalkPushforward_germ _ X.toΓSpecBase X.presheaf ⊤]
congr 1
change (X.toΓSpecBase _* X.presheaf).map le_top.hom.op ≫ _ = _
apply germ_res
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_stalk_stalk_map_to_Γ_Spec AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toStalk_stalkMap_toΓSpec
/-- The canonical morphism from `X` to the spectrum of its global sections. -/
@[simps! val_base]
def toΓSpec : X ⟶ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (Γ.obj (op X)) where
val := X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace
prop := by
intro x
let p : PrimeSpectrum (Γ.obj (op X)) := X.toΓSpecFun x
constructor
-- show stalk map is local hom ↓
let S := (structureSheaf _).presheaf.stalk p
rintro (t : S) ht
obtain ⟨⟨r, s⟩, he⟩ := IsLocalization.surj p.asIdeal.primeCompl t
dsimp at he
set t' := _
change t * t' = _ at he
apply isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left (y := t')
rw [he]
refine IsLocalization.map_units S (⟨r, ?_⟩ : p.asIdeal.primeCompl)
apply (not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk _ _ _).mpr
rw [← toStalk_stalkMap_toΓSpec]
erw [comp_apply, ← he]
rw [RingHom.map_mul]
-- Porting note: `IsLocalization.map_units` and the goal needs to be simplified before Lean
-- realize it is useful
have := IsLocalization.map_units (R := Γ.obj (op X)) S s
dsimp at this ⊢
exact ht.mul <| this.map _
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec
theorem comp_ring_hom_ext {X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u}} {R : CommRingCat.{u}} {f : R ⟶ Γ.obj (op X)}
{β : X ⟶ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R}
(w : X.toΓSpec.1.base ≫ (Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f).1.base = β.1.base)
(h :
∀ r : R,
f ≫ X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top : (Opens.map β.1.base).obj (basicOpen r) ⟶ _).op =
toOpen R (basicOpen r) ≫ β.1.c.app (op (basicOpen r))) :
X.toΓSpec ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f = β := by
ext1
-- Porting note: was `apply Spec.basicOpen_hom_ext`
refine Spec.basicOpen_hom_ext w ?_
intro r U
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_val_c_app]
erw [toOpen_comp_comap_assoc]
rw [Category.assoc]
erw [toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
exact h r
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext
/-- `toSpecΓ _` is an isomorphism so these are mutually two-sided inverses. -/
theorem Γ_Spec_left_triangle : toSpecΓ (Γ.obj (op X)) ≫ X.toΓSpec.1.c.app (op ⊤) = 𝟙 _ := by
unfold toSpecΓ
rw [← toOpen_res _ (basicOpen (1 : Γ.obj (op X))) ⊤ (eqToHom basicOpen_one.symm)]
erw [Category.assoc]
rw [NatTrans.naturality, ← Category.assoc]
erw [X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec 1, ← Functor.map_comp]
convert eqToHom_map X.presheaf _; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_Spec_left_triangle AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_Spec_left_triangle
end LocallyRingedSpace
/-- The unit as a natural transformation. -/
def identityToΓSpec : 𝟭 LocallyRingedSpace.{u} ⟶ Γ.rightOp ⋙ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace where
app := LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec
naturality X Y f := by
symm
apply LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext
· ext1 x
dsimp only [Spec.topMap, LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecFun]
-- Porting note: Had to add the next four lines
rw [comp_apply]
dsimp [toΓSpecBase]
-- The next six lines were `rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]` before
-- leanprover/lean4#2644
have : (ContinuousMap.mk (toΓSpecFun Y) (toΓSpec_continuous _)) (f.val.base x)
= toΓSpecFun Y (f.val.base x) := by rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
erw [this]
have : (ContinuousMap.mk (toΓSpecFun X) (toΓSpec_continuous _)) x
= toΓSpecFun X x := by rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
erw [this]
dsimp [toΓSpecFun]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← LocalRing.comap_closedPoint (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.val x), ←
PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp_apply, ← PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp_apply]
congr 2
exact (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap_germ f.1 ⊤ ⟨x, trivial⟩).symm
· intro r
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_val_c_app, ← Category.assoc]
erw [Y.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec, f.1.c.naturality]
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.identity_to_Γ_Spec AlgebraicGeometry.identityToΓSpec
namespace ΓSpec
set_option backward.isDefEq.lazyWhnfCore false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12534
theorem left_triangle (X : LocallyRingedSpace) :
SpecΓIdentity.inv.app (Γ.obj (op X)) ≫ (identityToΓSpec.app X).val.c.app (op ⊤) = 𝟙 _ :=
X.Γ_Spec_left_triangle
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.left_triangle AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.left_triangle
/-- `SpecΓIdentity` is iso so these are mutually two-sided inverses. -/
theorem right_triangle (R : CommRingCat) :
identityToΓSpec.app (Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.obj <| op R) ≫
Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.map (SpecΓIdentity.inv.app R).op =
𝟙 _ := by
apply LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext
· ext (p : PrimeSpectrum R)
dsimp
ext x
erw [← IsLocalization.AtPrime.to_map_mem_maximal_iff ((structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk p)
p.asIdeal x]
rfl
· intro r; apply toOpen_res
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.right_triangle AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.right_triangle
/-- The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from `CommRingᵒᵖ` to `LocallyRingedSpace`. -/
-- Porting note: `simps` cause a time out, so `Unit` and `counit` will be added manually
def locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction : Γ.rightOp ⊣ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.{u} :=
Adjunction.mkOfUnitCounit
{ unit := identityToΓSpec
counit := (NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity).inv
left_triangle := by
ext X; erw [Category.id_comp]
exact congr_arg Quiver.Hom.op (left_triangle X)
right_triangle := by
ext R : 2
-- Porting note: a little bit hand holding
change identityToΓSpec.app _ ≫ 𝟙 _ ≫ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.map _ =
𝟙 _
simp_rw [Category.id_comp, show (NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity).inv.app R =
(SpecΓIdentity.inv.app R.unop).op from rfl]
exact right_triangle R.unop
}
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.LocallyRingedSpace_adjunction AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_unit :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.unit = identityToΓSpec := rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.LocallyRingedSpace_adjunction_unit AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_unit
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit = (NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity.{u}).inv := rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.LocallyRingedSpace_adjunction_counit AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit
@[simp]
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app (R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit.app R =
(toOpen R.unop ⊤).op := rfl
@[simp]
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit.app (op <| CommRingCat.of R) =
(toOpen R ⊤).op := rfl
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_apply
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ}
(f : Γ.rightOp.obj X ⟶ R) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X R f =
identityToΓSpec.app X ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f.unop := rfl
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_apply'
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
(f : CommRingCat.of R ⟶ Γ.obj <| op X) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X (op <| CommRingCat.of R) (op f) =
identityToΓSpec.app X ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f := rfl
lemma toOpen_comp_locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_app
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
(f : Γ.rightOp.obj X ⟶ op (CommRingCat.of R)) (U) :
StructureSheaf.toOpen R U.unop ≫
(locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X (op <| CommRingCat.of R) f).1.c.app U =
f.unop ≫ X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top).op := by
rw [← StructureSheaf.toOpen_res _ _ _ (homOfLE le_top), Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality _ (homOfLE (le_top (a := U.unop))).op,
show (toOpen R ⊤) = (toOpen R ⊤).op.unop from rfl,
← locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app']
simp_rw [← Γ_map_op]
rw [← Γ.rightOp_map_unop, ← Category.assoc, ← unop_comp, ← Adjunction.homEquiv_counit,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
rfl
-- Porting Note: Commented
--attribute [local semireducible] Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace
/-- The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from `CommRingᵒᵖ` to `Scheme`. -/
def adjunction : Scheme.Γ.rightOp ⊣ Scheme.Spec :=
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.restrictFullyFaithful
Scheme.fullyFaithfulForgetToLocallyRingedSpace (Functor.FullyFaithful.id _)
(NatIso.ofComponents (fun X => Iso.refl _))
(NatIso.ofComponents (fun X => Iso.refl _))
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.adjunction AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/GammaSpecAdjunction.lean | 419 | 424 | theorem adjunction_homEquiv_apply {X : Scheme} {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ}
(f : (op <| Scheme.Γ.obj <| op X) ⟶ R) :
ΓSpec.adjunction.homEquiv X R f = locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X.1 R f := by |
dsimp only [adjunction]
rw [Adjunction.restrictFullyFaithful_homEquiv_apply, Adjunction.homEquiv_unit]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subcover, isLindelof_of_countable_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subfamily_closed :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅
→ ∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed, isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- The empty set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_empty : IsLindelof (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf _ hsf ↦
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
/-- A singleton set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_singleton {x : X} : IsLindelof ({x} : Set X) := fun f hf _ hfa ↦
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isLindelof (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsLindelof s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isLindelof_empty fun _ ↦ isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
apply isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
intro i U hU hUcover
have hiU : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ⊆ ⋃ i, U i :=
fun _ is ↦ _root_.subset_trans (subset_biUnion_of_mem is) hUcover
have iSets := fun i is ↦ (hf i is).elim_countable_subcover U hU (hiU i is)
choose! r hr using iSets
use ⋃ i ∈ s, r i
constructor
· refine (Countable.biUnion_iff hs).mpr ?h.left.a
exact fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1
· refine iUnion₂_subset ?h.right.h
intro i is
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
intro x hx
exact mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion (countable hs) hf
theorem Finset.isLindelof_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isLindelof_biUnion hf
theorem isLindelof_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsLindelof (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isLindelof_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Countable)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem isLindelof_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Set X} [Countable ι] (h : ∀ i, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i, f i) := (countable_range f).isLindelof_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof (hs : s.Countable) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof (hs : s.Finite) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem IsLindelof.countable_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (hs : IsLindelof s) :
s.Countable := by
have : ∀ x : X, ({x} : Set X) ∈ 𝓝 x := by simp [nhds_discrete]
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover (fun x => {x}) fun x _ => this x with ⟨t, ht, _, hssubt⟩
rw [biUnion_of_singleton] at hssubt
exact ht.mono hssubt
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology X] : IsLindelof s ↔ s.Countable :=
⟨fun h => h.countable_of_discrete, fun h => h.isLindelof⟩
theorem IsLindelof.union (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsLindelof t) : IsLindelof (s ∪ t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isLindelof_iUnion fun b => by cases b <;> assumption
protected theorem IsLindelof.insert (hs : IsLindelof s) (a) : IsLindelof (insert a s) :=
isLindelof_singleton.union hs
/-- If `X` has a basis consisting of compact opens, then an open set in `X` is compact open iff
it is a finite union of some elements in the basis -/
theorem isLindelof_open_iff_eq_countable_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis (b : ι → Set X)
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis (Set.range b)) (hb' : ∀ i, IsLindelof (b i)) (U : Set X) :
IsLindelof U ∧ IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s : Set ι, s.Countable ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨Y, f, rfl, hf⟩ := hb.open_eq_iUnion h₂
choose f' hf' using hf
have : b ∘ f' = f := funext hf'
subst this
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
h₁.elim_countable_subcover (b ∘ f') (fun i => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)) Subset.rfl
refine ⟨t.image f', Countable.image (ht.1) f', le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ht.2 ?_
simp only [Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i hi
rw [← Set.iUnion_subtype (fun x : ι => x ∈ t.image f') fun i => b i.1]
exact Set.subset_iUnion (fun i : t.image f' => b i) ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ hi⟩
· apply Set.iUnion₂_subset
rintro i hi
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ := (mem_image ..).mp hi
exact Set.subset_iUnion (b ∘ f') j
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun i _ => hb' i
· exact isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)
/-- `Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets. -/
def Filter.coLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
--`Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coLindelof : (coLindelof X).HasBasis IsLindelof compl :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun s hs t ht =>
⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩)
⟨∅, isLindelof_empty⟩
theorem mem_coLindelof : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_iff
theorem mem_coLindelof' : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
mem_coLindelof.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ => compl_subset_comm
theorem _root_.IsLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof (hs : IsLindelof s) : sᶜ ∈ coLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_of_mem hs
theorem coLindelof_le_cofinite : coLindelof X ≤ cofinite := fun s hs =>
compl_compl s ▸ hs.isLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof
theorem Tendsto.isLindelof_insert_range_of_coLindelof {f : X → Y} {y}
(hf : Tendsto f (coLindelof X) (𝓝 y)) (hfc : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (insert y (range f)) := by
intro l hne _ hle
by_cases hy : ClusterPt y l
· exact ⟨y, Or.inl rfl, hy⟩
simp only [clusterPt_iff, not_forall, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_not] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨s, hsy, t, htl, hd⟩
rcases mem_coLindelof.1 (hf hsy) with ⟨K, hKc, hKs⟩
have : f '' K ∈ l := by
filter_upwards [htl, le_principal_iff.1 hle] with y hyt hyf
rcases hyf with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [(hd.le_bot ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds hsy, hyt⟩).elim,
mem_image_of_mem _ (not_not.1 fun hxK => hd.le_bot ⟨hKs hxK, hyt⟩)]
rcases hKc.image hfc (le_principal_iff.2 this) with ⟨y, hy, hyl⟩
exact ⟨y, Or.inr <| image_subset_range _ _ hy, hyl⟩
/-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets. -/
def Filter.coclosedLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsClosed s) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coclosedLindelof :
(Filter.coclosedLindelof X).HasBasis (fun s => IsClosed s ∧ IsLindelof s) compl := by
simp only [Filter.coclosedLindelof, iInf_and']
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal' ?_ ⟨∅, isClosed_empty, isLindelof_empty⟩
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
exact ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨⟨hs₁.union ht₁, hs₂.union ht₂⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩⟩
theorem mem_coclosedLindelof : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s := by
simp only [hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_iff, and_assoc]
theorem mem_coclosed_Lindelof' : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t := by
simp only [mem_coclosedLindelof, compl_subset_comm]
theorem coLindelof_le_coclosedLindelof : coLindelof X ≤ coclosedLindelof X :=
iInf_mono fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
theorem IsLindeof.compl_mem_coclosedLindelof_of_isClosed (hs : IsLindelof s) (hs' : IsClosed s) :
sᶜ ∈ Filter.coclosedLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_of_mem ⟨hs', hs⟩
/-- X is a Lindelöf space iff every open cover has a countable subcover. -/
class LindelofSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In a Lindelöf space, `Set.univ` is a Lindelöf set. -/
isLindelof_univ : IsLindelof (univ : Set X)
instance (priority := 10) Subsingleton.lindelofSpace [Subsingleton X] : LindelofSpace X :=
⟨subsingleton_univ.isLindelof⟩
theorem isLindelof_univ_iff : IsLindelof (univ : Set X) ↔ LindelofSpace X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
theorem isLindelof_univ [h : LindelofSpace X] : IsLindelof (univ : Set X) :=
h.isLindelof_univ
theorem cluster_point_of_Lindelof [LindelofSpace X] (f : Filter X) [NeBot f]
[CountableInterFilter f] : ∃ x, ClusterPt x f := by
simpa using isLindelof_univ (show f ≤ 𝓟 univ by simp)
theorem LindelofSpace.elim_nhds_subcover [LindelofSpace X] (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = univ := by
obtain ⟨t, tc, -, s⟩ := IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover isLindelof_univ U fun x _ => hU x
use t, tc
apply top_unique s
theorem lindelofSpace_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → ⋂ i, t i = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i = ∅) :
LindelofSpace X where
isLindelof_univ := isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed fun t => by simpa using h t
theorem IsClosed.isLindelof [LindelofSpace X] (h : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_univ.of_isClosed_subset h (subset_univ _)
/-- A compact set `s` is Lindelöf. -/
theorem IsCompact.isLindelof (hs : IsCompact s) :
IsLindelof s := by tauto
/-- A σ-compact set `s` is Lindelöf-/
theorem IsSigmaCompact.isLindelof (hs : IsSigmaCompact s) :
IsLindelof s := by
rw [IsSigmaCompact] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨K, ⟨hc, huniv⟩⟩
rw [← huniv]
have hl : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n) := fun n ↦ IsCompact.isLindelof (hc n)
exact isLindelof_iUnion hl
/-- A compact space `X` is Lindelöf. -/
instance (priority := 100) [CompactSpace X] : LindelofSpace X :=
{ isLindelof_univ := isCompact_univ.isLindelof}
/-- A sigma-compact space `X` is Lindelöf. -/
instance (priority := 100) [SigmaCompactSpace X] : LindelofSpace X :=
{ isLindelof_univ := isSigmaCompact_univ.isLindelof}
/-- `X` is a non-Lindelöf topological space if it is not a Lindelöf space. -/
class NonLindelofSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In a non-Lindelöf space, `Set.univ` is not a Lindelöf set. -/
nonLindelof_univ : ¬IsLindelof (univ : Set X)
lemma nonLindelof_univ (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [NonLindelofSpace X] :
¬IsLindelof (univ : Set X) :=
NonLindelofSpace.nonLindelof_univ
theorem IsLindelof.ne_univ [NonLindelofSpace X] (hs : IsLindelof s) : s ≠ univ := fun h ↦
nonLindelof_univ X (h ▸ hs)
instance [NonLindelofSpace X] : NeBot (Filter.coLindelof X) := by
refine hasBasis_coLindelof.neBot_iff.2 fun {s} hs => ?_
contrapose hs
rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, compl_empty_iff] at hs
rw [hs]
exact nonLindelof_univ X
@[simp]
theorem Filter.coLindelof_eq_bot [LindelofSpace X] : Filter.coLindelof X = ⊥ :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.eq_bot_iff.mpr ⟨Set.univ, isLindelof_univ, Set.compl_univ⟩
instance [NonLindelofSpace X] : NeBot (Filter.coclosedLindelof X) :=
neBot_of_le coLindelof_le_coclosedLindelof
theorem nonLindelofSpace_of_neBot (_ : NeBot (Filter.coLindelof X)) : NonLindelofSpace X :=
⟨fun h' => (Filter.nonempty_of_mem h'.compl_mem_coLindelof).ne_empty compl_univ⟩
theorem Filter.coLindelof_neBot_iff : NeBot (Filter.coLindelof X) ↔ NonLindelofSpace X :=
⟨nonLindelofSpace_of_neBot, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
theorem not_LindelofSpace_iff : ¬LindelofSpace X ↔ NonLindelofSpace X :=
⟨fun h₁ => ⟨fun h₂ => h₁ ⟨h₂⟩⟩, fun ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ => h₁ h₂⟩
/-- A compact space `X` is Lindelöf. -/
instance (priority := 100) [CompactSpace X] : LindelofSpace X :=
{ isLindelof_univ := isCompact_univ.isLindelof}
theorem countable_of_Lindelof_of_discrete [LindelofSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : Countable X :=
countable_univ_iff.mp isLindelof_univ.countable_of_discrete
theorem countable_cover_nhds_interior [LindelofSpace X] {U : X → Set X} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, interior (U x) = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := isLindelof_univ.elim_countable_subcover (fun x => interior (U x))
(fun _ => isOpen_interior) fun x _ => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hU x)⟩
⟨t, ⟨ht.1, univ_subset_iff.1 ht.2⟩⟩
theorem countable_cover_nhds [LindelofSpace X] {U : X → Set X} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := countable_cover_nhds_interior hU
⟨t, ⟨ht.1, univ_subset_iff.1 <| ht.2.symm.subset.trans <|
iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => interior_subset⟩⟩
/-- The comap of the coLindelöf filter on `Y` by a continuous function `f : X → Y` is less than or
equal to the coLindelöf filter on `X`.
This is a reformulation of the fact that images of Lindelöf sets are Lindelöf. -/
theorem Filter.comap_coLindelof_le {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
(Filter.coLindelof Y).comap f ≤ Filter.coLindelof X := by
rw [(hasBasis_coLindelof.comap f).le_basis_iff hasBasis_coLindelof]
intro t ht
refine ⟨f '' t, ht.image hf, ?_⟩
simpa using t.subset_preimage_image f
theorem isLindelof_range [LindelofSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (range f) := by rw [← image_univ]; exact isLindelof_univ.image hf
theorem isLindelof_diagonal [LindelofSpace X] : IsLindelof (diagonal X) :=
@range_diag X ▸ isLindelof_range (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_id)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an `Inducing` map, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is Lindelöf
if and only if `s` is compact. -/
theorem Inducing.isLindelof_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : Inducing f) :
IsLindelof s ↔ IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun hs => hs.image hf.continuous, fun hs F F_ne_bot _ F_le => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, ⟨x, x_in : x ∈ s, rfl⟩, hx : ClusterPt (f x) (map f F)⟩ :=
hs ((map_mono F_le).trans_eq map_principal)
exact ⟨x, x_in, hf.mapClusterPt_iff.1 hx⟩
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an `Embedding`, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is Lindelöf
if and only if `s` is Lindelöf. -/
theorem Embedding.isLindelof_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : Embedding f) :
IsLindelof s ↔ IsLindelof (f '' s) := hf.toInducing.isLindelof_iff
/-- The preimage of a Lindelöf set under an inducing map is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem Inducing.isLindelof_preimage {f : X → Y} (hf : Inducing f) (hf' : IsClosed (range f))
{K : Set Y} (hK : IsLindelof K) : IsLindelof (f ⁻¹' K) := by
replace hK := hK.inter_right hf'
rwa [hf.isLindelof_iff, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
/-- The preimage of a Lindelöf set under a closed embedding is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem ClosedEmbedding.isLindelof_preimage {f : X → Y} (hf : ClosedEmbedding f)
{K : Set Y} (hK : IsLindelof K) : IsLindelof (f ⁻¹' K) :=
hf.toInducing.isLindelof_preimage (hf.isClosed_range) hK
/-- A closed embedding is proper, ie, inverse images of Lindelöf sets are contained in Lindelöf.
Moreover, the preimage of a Lindelöf set is Lindelöf, see `ClosedEmbedding.isLindelof_preimage`. -/
theorem ClosedEmbedding.tendsto_coLindelof {f : X → Y} (hf : ClosedEmbedding f) :
Tendsto f (Filter.coLindelof X) (Filter.coLindelof Y) :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.tendsto_right_iff.mpr fun _K hK =>
(hf.isLindelof_preimage hK).compl_mem_coLindelof
/-- Sets of subtype are Lindelöf iff the image under a coercion is. -/
theorem Subtype.isLindelof_iff {p : X → Prop} {s : Set { x // p x }} :
IsLindelof s ↔ IsLindelof ((↑) '' s : Set X) :=
embedding_subtype_val.isLindelof_iff
theorem isLindelof_iff_isLindelof_univ : IsLindelof s ↔ IsLindelof (univ : Set s) := by
rw [Subtype.isLindelof_iff, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem isLindelof_iff_LindelofSpace : IsLindelof s ↔ LindelofSpace s :=
isLindelof_iff_isLindelof_univ.trans isLindelof_univ_iff
lemma IsLindelof.of_coe [LindelofSpace s] : IsLindelof s := isLindelof_iff_LindelofSpace.mpr ‹_›
theorem IsLindelof.countable (hs : IsLindelof s) (hs' : DiscreteTopology s) : s.Countable :=
countable_coe_iff.mp
(@countable_of_Lindelof_of_discrete _ _ (isLindelof_iff_LindelofSpace.mp hs) hs')
protected theorem ClosedEmbedding.nonLindelofSpace [NonLindelofSpace X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : ClosedEmbedding f) : NonLindelofSpace Y :=
nonLindelofSpace_of_neBot hf.tendsto_coLindelof.neBot
protected theorem ClosedEmbedding.LindelofSpace [h : LindelofSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : ClosedEmbedding f) : LindelofSpace X :=
⟨by rw [hf.toInducing.isLindelof_iff, image_univ]; exact hf.isClosed_range.isLindelof⟩
/-- Countable topological spaces are Lindelof. -/
instance (priority := 100) Countable.LindelofSpace [Countable X] : LindelofSpace X where
isLindelof_univ := countable_univ.isLindelof
/-- The disjoint union of two Lindelöf spaces is Lindelöf. -/
instance [LindelofSpace X] [LindelofSpace Y] : LindelofSpace (X ⊕ Y) where
isLindelof_univ := by
rw [← range_inl_union_range_inr]
exact (isLindelof_range continuous_inl).union (isLindelof_range continuous_inr)
instance {X : ι → Type*} [Countable ι] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, LindelofSpace (X i)] :
LindelofSpace (Σi, X i) where
isLindelof_univ := by
rw [Sigma.univ]
exact isLindelof_iUnion fun i => isLindelof_range continuous_sigmaMk
instance Quot.LindelofSpace {r : X → X → Prop} [LindelofSpace X] : LindelofSpace (Quot r) where
isLindelof_univ := by
rw [← range_quot_mk]
exact isLindelof_range continuous_quot_mk
instance Quotient.LindelofSpace {s : Setoid X} [LindelofSpace X] : LindelofSpace (Quotient s) :=
Quot.LindelofSpace
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 670 | 674 | theorem LindelofSpace.of_continuous_surjective {f : X → Y} [LindelofSpace X] (hf : Continuous f)
(hsur : Function.Surjective f) : LindelofSpace Y where
isLindelof_univ := by |
rw [← Set.image_univ_of_surjective hsur]
exact IsLindelof.image (isLindelof_univ_iff.mpr ‹_›) hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.IdealOperations
#align_import algebra.lie.abelian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8983bec7cdf6cb2dd1f21315c8a34ab00d7b2f6d"
/-!
# Trivial Lie modules and Abelian Lie algebras
The action of a Lie algebra `L` on a module `M` is trivial if `⁅x, m⁆ = 0` for all `x ∈ L` and
`m ∈ M`. In the special case that `M = L` with the adjoint action, triviality corresponds to the
concept of an Abelian Lie algebra.
In this file we define these concepts and provide some related definitions and results.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.IsTrivial`
* `IsLieAbelian`
* `commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring`
* `LieModule.ker`
* `LieModule.maxTrivSubmodule`
* `LieAlgebra.center`
## Tags
lie algebra, abelian, commutative, center
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
/-- A Lie (ring) module is trivial iff all brackets vanish. -/
class LieModule.IsTrivial (L : Type v) (M : Type w) [Bracket L M] [Zero M] : Prop where
trivial : ∀ (x : L) (m : M), ⁅x, m⁆ = 0
#align lie_module.is_trivial LieModule.IsTrivial
@[simp]
theorem trivial_lie_zero (L : Type v) (M : Type w) [Bracket L M] [Zero M] [LieModule.IsTrivial L M]
(x : L) (m : M) : ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 :=
LieModule.IsTrivial.trivial x m
#align trivial_lie_zero trivial_lie_zero
instance LieModule.instIsTrivialOfSubsingleton {L M : Type*}
[LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [LieRingModule L M] [Subsingleton L] : LieModule.IsTrivial L M :=
⟨fun x m ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.eq_zero x, zero_lie]⟩
instance LieModule.instIsTrivialOfSubsingleton' {L M : Type*}
[LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [LieRingModule L M] [Subsingleton M] : LieModule.IsTrivial L M :=
⟨fun x m ↦ by simp_rw [Subsingleton.eq_zero m, lie_zero]⟩
/-- A Lie algebra is Abelian iff it is trivial as a Lie module over itself. -/
abbrev IsLieAbelian (L : Type v) [Bracket L L] [Zero L] : Prop :=
LieModule.IsTrivial L L
#align is_lie_abelian IsLieAbelian
instance LieIdeal.isLieAbelian_of_trivial (R : Type u) (L : Type v) [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
[LieAlgebra R L] (I : LieIdeal R L) [h : LieModule.IsTrivial L I] : IsLieAbelian I where
trivial x y := by apply h.trivial
#align lie_ideal.is_lie_abelian_of_trivial LieIdeal.isLieAbelian_of_trivial
theorem Function.Injective.isLieAbelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w} [CommRing R]
[LieRing L₁] [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₁] [LieAlgebra R L₂] {f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂}
(h₁ : Function.Injective f) (_ : IsLieAbelian L₂) : IsLieAbelian L₁ :=
{ trivial := fun x y => h₁ <|
calc
f ⁅x, y⁆ = ⁅f x, f y⁆ := LieHom.map_lie f x y
_ = 0 := trivial_lie_zero _ _ _ _
_ = f 0 := f.map_zero.symm}
#align function.injective.is_lie_abelian Function.Injective.isLieAbelian
theorem Function.Surjective.isLieAbelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w} [CommRing R]
[LieRing L₁] [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₁] [LieAlgebra R L₂] {f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂}
(h₁ : Function.Surjective f) (h₂ : IsLieAbelian L₁) : IsLieAbelian L₂ :=
{ trivial := fun x y => by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h₁ x
obtain ⟨v, rfl⟩ := h₁ y
rw [← LieHom.map_lie, trivial_lie_zero, LieHom.map_zero] }
#align function.surjective.is_lie_abelian Function.Surjective.isLieAbelian
theorem lie_abelian_iff_equiv_lie_abelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w} [CommRing R]
[LieRing L₁] [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₁] [LieAlgebra R L₂] (e : L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) :
IsLieAbelian L₁ ↔ IsLieAbelian L₂ :=
⟨e.symm.injective.isLieAbelian, e.injective.isLieAbelian⟩
#align lie_abelian_iff_equiv_lie_abelian lie_abelian_iff_equiv_lie_abelian
theorem commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring {A : Type v} [Ring A] :
Std.Commutative (α := A) (· * ·) ↔ IsLieAbelian A := by
have h₁ : Std.Commutative (α := A) (· * ·) ↔ ∀ a b : A, a * b = b * a :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
have h₂ : IsLieAbelian A ↔ ∀ a b : A, ⁅a, b⁆ = 0 := ⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
simp only [h₁, h₂, LieRing.of_associative_ring_bracket, sub_eq_zero]
#align commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring
section Center
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w) (N : Type w₁)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [LieRingModule L N] [LieModule R L N]
namespace LieModule
/-- The kernel of the action of a Lie algebra `L` on a Lie module `M` as a Lie ideal in `L`. -/
protected def ker : LieIdeal R L :=
(toEnd R L M).ker
#align lie_module.ker LieModule.ker
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_ker (x : L) : x ∈ LieModule.ker R L M ↔ ∀ m : M, ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 := by
simp only [LieModule.ker, LieHom.mem_ker, LinearMap.ext_iff, LinearMap.zero_apply,
toEnd_apply_apply]
#align lie_module.mem_ker LieModule.mem_ker
/-- The largest submodule of a Lie module `M` on which the Lie algebra `L` acts trivially. -/
def maxTrivSubmodule : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := { m | ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 }
zero_mem' x := lie_zero x
add_mem' {x y} hx hy z := by rw [lie_add, hx, hy, add_zero]
smul_mem' c x hx y := by rw [lie_smul, hx, smul_zero]
lie_mem {x m} hm y := by rw [hm, lie_zero]
#align lie_module.max_triv_submodule LieModule.maxTrivSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem mem_maxTrivSubmodule (m : M) : m ∈ maxTrivSubmodule R L M ↔ ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_module.mem_max_triv_submodule LieModule.mem_maxTrivSubmodule
instance : IsTrivial L (maxTrivSubmodule R L M) where trivial x m := Subtype.ext (m.property x)
@[simp]
theorem ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot (I : LieIdeal R L) :
⁅I, maxTrivSubmodule R L M⁆ = ⊥ := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span,
LieSubmodule.bot_coeSubmodule, Submodule.span_eq_bot]
rintro m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
exact hm x
#align lie_module.ideal_oper_max_triv_submodule_eq_bot LieModule.ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot
theorem le_max_triv_iff_bracket_eq_bot {N : LieSubmodule R L M} :
N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M ↔ ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h m hm => ?_⟩
· rw [← le_bot_iff, ← ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot R L M ⊤]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right _ _ ⊤ h
· rw [mem_maxTrivSubmodule]
rw [LieSubmodule.lie_eq_bot_iff] at h
exact fun x => h x (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) m hm
#align lie_module.le_max_triv_iff_bracket_eq_bot LieModule.le_max_triv_iff_bracket_eq_bot
theorem trivial_iff_le_maximal_trivial (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
IsTrivial L N ↔ N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M :=
⟨fun h m hm x => IsTrivial.casesOn h fun h => Subtype.ext_iff.mp (h x ⟨m, hm⟩), fun h =>
{ trivial := fun x m => Subtype.ext (h m.2 x) }⟩
#align lie_module.trivial_iff_le_maximal_trivial LieModule.trivial_iff_le_maximal_trivial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Abelian.lean | 160 | 164 | theorem isTrivial_iff_max_triv_eq_top : IsTrivial L M ↔ maxTrivSubmodule R L M = ⊤ := by |
constructor
· rintro ⟨h⟩; ext; simp only [mem_maxTrivSubmodule, h, forall_const, LieSubmodule.mem_top]
· intro h; constructor; intro x m; revert x
rw [← mem_maxTrivSubmodule R L M, h]; exact LieSubmodule.mem_top m
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ioi_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ioi_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ioi a * Ici b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ioi_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ioi_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ioi b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
end ContravariantLT
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ -x`
-/
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioo Set.image_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ici Set.image_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iic Set.image_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioi Set.image_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iio Set.image_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Icc Set.image_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ico Set.image_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioc Set.image_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioo Set.image_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ici Set.image_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iic Set.image_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioi Set.image_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) '' Iio b = Iio (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iio Set.image_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Icc Set.image_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) '' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ico Set.image_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioc Set.image_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioo Set.image_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Bijections
-/
theorem Iic_add_bij : BijOn (· + a) (Iic b) (Iic (b + a)) :=
image_add_const_Iic a b ▸ (add_left_injective _).injOn.bijOn_image
#align set.Iic_add_bij Set.Iic_add_bij
theorem Iio_add_bij : BijOn (· + a) (Iio b) (Iio (b + a)) :=
image_add_const_Iio a b ▸ (add_left_injective _).injOn.bijOn_image
#align set.Iio_add_bij Set.Iio_add_bij
end OrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_uIcc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simp only [← Icc_min_max, preimage_const_add_Icc, min_sub_sub_right, max_sub_sub_right]
#align set.preimage_const_add_uIcc Set.preimage_const_add_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_uIcc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simpa only [add_comm] using preimage_const_add_uIcc a b c
#align set.preimage_add_const_uIcc Set.preimage_add_const_uIcc
-- TODO: Why is the notation `-[[a, b]]` broken?
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_uIcc : @Neg.neg (Set α) Set.neg [[a, b]] = [[-a, -b]] := by
simp only [← Icc_min_max, preimage_neg_Icc, min_neg_neg, max_neg_neg]
#align set.preimage_neg_uIcc Set.preimage_neg_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_uIcc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b + a, c + a]] := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_uIcc Set.preimage_sub_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_uIcc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[a - b, a - c]] := by
simp_rw [← Icc_min_max, preimage_const_sub_Icc]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, min_add_add_left, max_add_add_left, min_neg_neg, max_neg_neg]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_uIcc Set.preimage_const_sub_uIcc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this module `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_uIcc : (fun x => a + x) '' [[b, c]] = [[a + b, a + c]] := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_uIcc Set.image_const_add_uIcc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_uIcc : (fun x => x + a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b + a, c + a]] := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_uIcc Set.image_add_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_uIcc : (fun x => a - x) '' [[b, c]] = [[a - b, a - c]] := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_uIcc Set.image_const_sub_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_uIcc : (fun x => x - a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
#align set.image_sub_const_uIcc Set.image_sub_const_uIcc
theorem image_neg_uIcc : Neg.neg '' [[a, b]] = [[-a, -b]] := by simp
#align set.image_neg_uIcc Set.image_neg_uIcc
variable {a b c d}
/-- If `[c, d]` is a subinterval of `[a, b]`, then the distance between `c` and `d` is less than or
equal to that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc (h : [[c, d]] ⊆ [[a, b]]) : |d - c| ≤ |b - a| := by
rw [← max_sub_min_eq_abs, ← max_sub_min_eq_abs]
rw [uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le] at h
exact sub_le_sub h.2 h.1
#align set.abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc Set.abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc
/-- If `c ∈ [a, b]`, then the distance between `a` and `c` is less than or equal to
that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc (h : c ∈ [[a, b]]) : |c - a| ≤ |b - a| :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc_left h
#align set.abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc Set.abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc
/-- If `x ∈ [a, b]`, then the distance between `c` and `b` is less than or equal to
that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc (h : c ∈ [[a, b]]) : |b - c| ≤ |b - a| :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc_right h
#align set.abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc Set.abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
/-!
### Multiplication and inverse in a field
-/
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iio Set.preimage_const_mul_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iic Set.preimage_const_mul_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ici Set.preimage_const_mul_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ico Set.preimage_const_mul_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Icc Set.preimage_const_mul_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Icc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Icc_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Icc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_uIcc (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c : α) :
(· * a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b / a, c / a]] :=
(lt_or_gt_of_ne ha).elim
(fun h => by
simp [← Icc_min_max, h, h.le, min_div_div_right_of_nonpos, max_div_div_right_of_nonpos])
fun ha : 0 < a => by simp [← Icc_min_max, ha, ha.le, min_div_div_right, max_div_div_right]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_uIcc Set.preimage_mul_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_uIcc (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c : α) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b / a, c / a]] := by
simp only [← preimage_mul_const_uIcc ha, mul_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_uIcc Set.preimage_const_mul_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_div_const_uIcc (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c : α) :
(fun x => x / a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b * a, c * a]] := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, preimage_mul_const_uIcc (inv_ne_zero ha), inv_inv]
#align set.preimage_div_const_uIcc Set.preimage_div_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_mul_const_uIcc (a b c : α) : (· * a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b * a, c * a]] :=
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha]
else calc
(fun x => x * a) '' [[b, c]] = (· * a⁻¹) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] :=
(Units.mk0 a ha).mulRight.image_eq_preimage _
_ = (fun x => x / a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] := by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
_ = [[b * a, c * a]] := preimage_div_const_uIcc ha _ _
#align set.image_mul_const_uIcc Set.image_mul_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_mul_uIcc (a b c : α) : (a * ·) '' [[b, c]] = [[a * b, a * c]] := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using image_mul_const_uIcc a b c
#align set.image_const_mul_uIcc Set.image_const_mul_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_div_const_uIcc (a b c : α) : (fun x => x / a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b / a, c / a]] := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, image_mul_const_uIcc]
#align set.image_div_const_uIcc Set.image_div_const_uIcc
theorem image_mul_right_Icc' (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) :=
((Units.mk0 c h.ne').mulRight.image_eq_preimage _).trans (by simp [h, division_def])
#align set.image_mul_right_Icc' Set.image_mul_right_Icc'
theorem image_mul_right_Icc {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
(fun x => x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) := by
cases eq_or_lt_of_le hc
· subst c
simp [(nonempty_Icc.2 hab).image_const]
exact image_mul_right_Icc' a b ‹0 < c›
#align set.image_mul_right_Icc Set.image_mul_right_Icc
theorem image_mul_left_Icc' {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b c : α) :
(a * ·) '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) := by
convert image_mul_right_Icc' b c h using 1 <;> simp only [mul_comm _ a]
#align set.image_mul_left_Icc' Set.image_mul_left_Icc'
theorem image_mul_left_Icc {a b c : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
(a * ·) '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) := by
convert image_mul_right_Icc hbc ha using 1 <;> simp only [mul_comm _ a]
#align set.image_mul_left_Icc Set.image_mul_left_Icc
theorem image_mul_right_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) '' Ioo a b = Ioo (a * c) (b * c) :=
((Units.mk0 c h.ne').mulRight.image_eq_preimage _).trans (by simp [h, division_def])
#align set.image_mul_right_Ioo Set.image_mul_right_Ioo
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 841 | 843 | theorem image_mul_left_Ioo {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b c : α) :
(a * ·) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a * b) (a * c) := by |
convert image_mul_right_Ioo b c h using 1 <;> simp only [mul_comm _ a]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDenseLp
#align_import measure_theory.integral.set_to_l1 from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Let `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` be additive for measurable sets with finite measure, in the sense that
for `s, t` two such sets, `s ∩ t = ∅ → T (s ∪ t) = T s + T t`. `T` is akin to a bilinear map on
`Set α × E`, or a linear map on indicator functions.
This file constructs an extension of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of
indicators of measurable sets with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of
integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. This extension process is used to
define the Bochner integral in the `MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner` file and the conditional
expectation of an integrable function in `MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation`.
## Main Definitions
- `FinMeasAdditive μ T`: the property that `T` is additive on measurable sets with finite measure.
For two such sets, `s ∩ t = ∅ → T (s ∪ t) = T s + T t`.
- `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`: `FinMeasAdditive μ T ∧ ∀ s, ‖T s‖ ≤ C * (μ s).toReal`.
This is the property needed to perform the extension from indicators to L1.
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is a `NormedLatticeAddCommGroup` and `T` is such that `0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we
also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
## Implementation notes
The starting object `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` matters only through its restriction on measurable sets
with finite measure. Its value on other sets is ignored.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Pointwise
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
open Finset
section FinMeasAdditive
/-- A set function is `FinMeasAdditive` if its value on the union of two disjoint measurable
sets with finite measure is the sum of its values on each set. -/
def FinMeasAdditive {β} [AddMonoid β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (T : Set α → β) :
Prop :=
∀ s t, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet t → μ s ≠ ∞ → μ t ≠ ∞ → s ∩ t = ∅ → T (s ∪ t) = T s + T t
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive
namespace FinMeasAdditive
variable {β : Type*} [AddCommMonoid β] {T T' : Set α → β}
theorem zero : FinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → β) := fun s t _ _ _ _ _ => by simp
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.zero MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.zero
theorem add (hT : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hT' : FinMeasAdditive μ T') :
FinMeasAdditive μ (T + T') := by
intro s t hs ht hμs hμt hst
simp only [hT s t hs ht hμs hμt hst, hT' s t hs ht hμs hμt hst, Pi.add_apply]
abel
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.add MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.add
theorem smul [Monoid 𝕜] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] (hT : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : 𝕜) :
FinMeasAdditive μ fun s => c • T s := fun s t hs ht hμs hμt hst => by
simp [hT s t hs ht hμs hμt hst]
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.smul MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.smul
theorem of_eq_top_imp_eq_top {μ' : Measure α} (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = ∞ → μ' s = ∞)
(hT : FinMeasAdditive μ T) : FinMeasAdditive μ' T := fun s t hs ht hμ's hμ't hst =>
hT s t hs ht (mt (h s hs) hμ's) (mt (h t ht) hμ't) hst
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.of_eq_top_imp_eq_top MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.of_eq_top_imp_eq_top
theorem of_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞) (hT : FinMeasAdditive (c • μ) T) :
FinMeasAdditive μ T := by
refine of_eq_top_imp_eq_top (fun s _ hμs => ?_) hT
rw [Measure.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_eq_top] at hμs
simp only [hc_ne_top, or_false_iff, Ne, false_and_iff] at hμs
exact hμs.2
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.of_smul_measure MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.of_smul_measure
theorem smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hT : FinMeasAdditive μ T) :
FinMeasAdditive (c • μ) T := by
refine of_eq_top_imp_eq_top (fun s _ hμs => ?_) hT
rw [Measure.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_eq_top]
simp only [hc_ne_zero, true_and_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact Or.inl hμs
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.smul_measure MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.smul_measure
theorem smul_measure_iff (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞) :
FinMeasAdditive (c • μ) T ↔ FinMeasAdditive μ T :=
⟨fun hT => of_smul_measure c hc_ne_top hT, fun hT => smul_measure c hc_ne_zero hT⟩
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.smul_measure_iff MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.smul_measure_iff
theorem map_empty_eq_zero {β} [AddCancelMonoid β] {T : Set α → β} (hT : FinMeasAdditive μ T) :
T ∅ = 0 := by
have h_empty : μ ∅ ≠ ∞ := (measure_empty.le.trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top).ne
specialize hT ∅ ∅ MeasurableSet.empty MeasurableSet.empty h_empty h_empty (Set.inter_empty ∅)
rw [Set.union_empty] at hT
nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (T ∅)] at hT
exact (add_left_cancel hT).symm
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.map_empty_eq_zero MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.map_empty_eq_zero
theorem map_iUnion_fin_meas_set_eq_sum (T : Set α → β) (T_empty : T ∅ = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {ι} (S : ι → Set α) (sι : Finset ι)
(hS_meas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (S i)) (hSp : ∀ i ∈ sι, μ (S i) ≠ ∞)
(h_disj : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ sι) (j ∈ sι), i ≠ j → Disjoint (S i) (S j)) :
T (⋃ i ∈ sι, S i) = ∑ i ∈ sι, T (S i) := by
revert hSp h_disj
refine Finset.induction_on sι ?_ ?_
· simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, IsEmpty.forall_iff, iUnion_false, iUnion_empty, sum_empty,
forall₂_true_iff, imp_true_iff, forall_true_left, not_false_iff, T_empty]
intro a s has h hps h_disj
rw [Finset.sum_insert has, ← h]
swap; · exact fun i hi => hps i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
swap;
· exact fun i hi j hj hij =>
h_disj i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) hij
rw [←
h_add (S a) (⋃ i ∈ s, S i) (hS_meas a) (measurableSet_biUnion _ fun i _ => hS_meas i)
(hps a (Finset.mem_insert_self a s))]
· congr; convert Finset.iSup_insert a s S
· exact
((measure_biUnion_finset_le _ _).trans_lt <|
ENNReal.sum_lt_top fun i hi => hps i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi).ne
· simp_rw [Set.inter_iUnion]
refine iUnion_eq_empty.mpr fun i => iUnion_eq_empty.mpr fun hi => ?_
rw [← Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
refine h_disj a (Finset.mem_insert_self a s) i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) fun hai => ?_
rw [← hai] at hi
exact has hi
#align measure_theory.fin_meas_additive.map_Union_fin_meas_set_eq_sum MeasureTheory.FinMeasAdditive.map_iUnion_fin_meas_set_eq_sum
end FinMeasAdditive
/-- A `FinMeasAdditive` set function whose norm on every set is less than the measure of the
set (up to a multiplicative constant). -/
def DominatedFinMeasAdditive {β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
(T : Set α → β) (C : ℝ) : Prop :=
FinMeasAdditive μ T ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * (μ s).toReal
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive
namespace DominatedFinMeasAdditive
variable {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {T T' : Set α → β} {C C' : ℝ}
theorem zero {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (hC : 0 ≤ C) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → β) C := by
refine ⟨FinMeasAdditive.zero, fun s _ _ => ?_⟩
rw [Pi.zero_apply, norm_zero]
exact mul_nonneg hC toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.zero MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.zero
theorem eq_zero_of_measure_zero {β : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup β] {T : Set α → β} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hs_zero : μ s = 0) :
T s = 0 := by
refine norm_eq_zero.mp ?_
refine ((hT.2 s hs (by simp [hs_zero])).trans (le_of_eq ?_)).antisymm (norm_nonneg _)
rw [hs_zero, ENNReal.zero_toReal, mul_zero]
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.eq_zero_of_measure_zero MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.eq_zero_of_measure_zero
theorem eq_zero {β : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup β] {T : Set α → β} {C : ℝ} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (0 : Measure α) T C) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
T s = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_measure_zero hT hs (by simp only [Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply])
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.eq_zero MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.eq_zero
theorem add (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (T + T') (C + C') := by
refine ⟨hT.1.add hT'.1, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
rw [Pi.add_apply, add_mul]
exact (norm_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add (hT.2 s hs hμs) (hT'.2 s hs hμs))
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.add MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.add
theorem smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 β] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : 𝕜) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (fun s => c • T s) (‖c‖ * C) := by
refine ⟨hT.1.smul c, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [norm_smul, mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul le_rfl (hT.2 s hs hμs) (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.smul MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.smul
theorem of_measure_le {μ' : Measure α} (h : μ ≤ μ') (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C := by
have h' : ∀ s, μ s = ∞ → μ' s = ∞ := fun s hs ↦ top_unique <| hs.symm.trans_le (h _)
refine ⟨hT.1.of_eq_top_imp_eq_top fun s _ ↦ h' s, fun s hs hμ's ↦ ?_⟩
have hμs : μ s < ∞ := (h s).trans_lt hμ's
calc
‖T s‖ ≤ C * (μ s).toReal := hT.2 s hs hμs
_ ≤ C * (μ' s).toReal := by gcongr; exacts [hμ's.ne, h _]
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.of_measure_le MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.of_measure_le
theorem add_measure_right {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α)
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C) : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + ν) T C :=
of_measure_le (Measure.le_add_right le_rfl) hT hC
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.add_measure_right MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.add_measure_right
theorem add_measure_left {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α)
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive ν T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C) : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + ν) T C :=
of_measure_le (Measure.le_add_left le_rfl) hT hC
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.add_measure_left MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.add_measure_left
theorem of_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (c • μ) T C) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T (c.toReal * C) := by
have h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → c • μ s = ∞ → μ s = ∞ := by
intro s _ hcμs
simp only [hc_ne_top, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_eq_top, or_false_iff, Ne,
false_and_iff] at hcμs
exact hcμs.2
refine ⟨hT.1.of_eq_top_imp_eq_top (μ := c • μ) h, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
have hcμs : c • μ s ≠ ∞ := mt (h s hs) hμs.ne
rw [smul_eq_mul] at hcμs
simp_rw [DominatedFinMeasAdditive, Measure.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul] at hT
refine (hT.2 s hs hcμs.lt_top).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
ring
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.of_smul_measure MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.of_smul_measure
theorem of_measure_le_smul {μ' : Measure α} (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) (h : μ ≤ c • μ')
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T (c.toReal * C) :=
(hT.of_measure_le h hC).of_smul_measure c hc
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive.of_measure_le_smul MeasureTheory.DominatedFinMeasAdditive.of_measure_le_smul
end DominatedFinMeasAdditive
end FinMeasAdditive
namespace SimpleFunc
/-- Extend `Set α → (F →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →ₛ F) → F'`. -/
def setToSimpleFunc {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (T : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F') (f : α →ₛ F) : F' :=
∑ x ∈ f.range, T (f ⁻¹' {x}) x
#align measure_theory.simple_func.set_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 284 | 285 | theorem setToSimpleFunc_zero {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ F) :
setToSimpleFunc (0 : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F') f = 0 := by | simp [setToSimpleFunc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.MulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
#align_import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Asymptotics
We introduce these relations:
* `IsBigOWith c l f g` : "f is big O of g along l with constant c";
* `f =O[l] g` : "f is big O of g along l";
* `f =o[l] g` : "f is little o of g along l".
Here `l` is any filter on the domain of `f` and `g`, which are assumed to be the same. The codomains
of `f` and `g` do not need to be the same; all that is needed that there is a norm associated with
these types, and it is the norm that is compared asymptotically.
The relation `IsBigOWith c` is introduced to factor out common algebraic arguments in the proofs of
similar properties of `IsBigO` and `IsLittleO`. Usually proofs outside of this file should use
`IsBigO` instead.
Often the ranges of `f` and `g` will be the real numbers, in which case the norm is the absolute
value. In general, we have
`f =O[l] g ↔ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖) =O[l] (fun x ↦ ‖g x‖)`,
and similarly for `IsLittleO`. But our setup allows us to use the notions e.g. with functions
to the integers, rationals, complex numbers, or any normed vector space without mentioning the
norm explicitly.
If `f` and `g` are functions to a normed field like the reals or complex numbers and `g` is always
nonzero, we have
`f =o[l] g ↔ Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / (g x)) l (𝓝 0)`.
In fact, the right-to-left direction holds without the hypothesis on `g`, and in the other direction
it suffices to assume that `f` is zero wherever `g` is. (This generalization is useful in defining
the Fréchet derivative.)
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter NNReal
namespace Asymptotics
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {E : Type*} {F : Type*} {G : Type*} {E' : Type*}
{F' : Type*} {G' : Type*} {E'' : Type*} {F'' : Type*} {G'' : Type*} {E''' : Type*}
{R : Type*} {R' : Type*} {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*}
variable [Norm E] [Norm F] [Norm G]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedAddCommGroup F''] [NormedAddCommGroup G''] [SeminormedRing R]
[SeminormedAddGroup E''']
[SeminormedRing R']
variable [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜']
variable {c c' c₁ c₂ : ℝ} {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G}
variable {f' : α → E'} {g' : α → F'} {k' : α → G'}
variable {f'' : α → E''} {g'' : α → F''} {k'' : α → G''}
variable {l l' : Filter α}
section Defs
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- This version of the Landau notation `IsBigOWith C l f g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on
a type `α` and `l` is a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by `C * ‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded by `C`, modulo division by zero issues that are
avoided by this definition. Probably you want to use `IsBigO` instead of this relation. -/
irreducible_def IsBigOWith (c : ℝ) (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
#align asymptotics.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigOWith` is irreducible. -/
theorem isBigOWith_iff : IsBigOWith c l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by rw [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_iff Asymptotics.isBigOWith_iff
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.bound, IsBigOWith.of_bound⟩ := isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =O[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by a constant multiple of `‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded, modulo division by zero issues that are avoided
by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsBigO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =O[" l "] " g:100 => IsBigO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigO` is
irreducible. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g := by rw [IsBigO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isBigO_iff : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_iff
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with a positive constant. -/
theorem isBigO_iff' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff] at h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
refine ⟨max c 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _), ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
apply hx.trans
gcongr
exact le_max_left _ _
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff]
obtain ⟨c, ⟨_, hc⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with the constant in the lower bound. -/
theorem isBigO_iff'' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff'] at h
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)]
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff']
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [← inv_inv c, inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)] at hx
theorem IsBigO.of_bound (c : ℝ) (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff.2 ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound
theorem IsBigO.of_bound' (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound 1 <| by
simp_rw [one_mul]
exact h
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound' Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound'
theorem IsBigO.bound : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigO_iff.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =o[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by an arbitrarily small constant
multiple of `‖g‖`. In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` tends to `0` along `l`, modulo division by zero
issues that are avoided by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsLittleO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_o Asymptotics.IsLittleO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =o[" l "] " g:100 => IsLittleO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g := by
rw [IsLittleO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
alias ⟨IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith, IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith⟩ := isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff
alias ⟨IsLittleO.bound, IsLittleO.of_bound⟩ := isLittleO_iff
#align asymptotics.is_o.bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.bound
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_bound
theorem IsLittleO.def (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def
theorem IsLittleO.def' (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigOWith_iff.2 <| isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def'
theorem IsLittleO.eventuallyLE (h : f =o[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simpa using h.def zero_lt_one
end Defs
/-! ### Conversions -/
theorem IsBigOWith.isBigO (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) : f =O[l] g := by rw [IsBigO_def]; exact ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.isBigO
theorem IsLittleO.isBigOWith (hgf : f =o[l] g) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
hgf.def' zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigOWith
theorem IsLittleO.isBigO (hgf : f =o[l] g) : f =O[l] g :=
hgf.isBigOWith.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigO
theorem IsBigO.isBigOWith : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigO.isBigOWith
theorem IsBigOWith.weaken (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : c ≤ c') : IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_of_superset h.bound fun x hx =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ := hx
_ ≤ _ := by gcongr
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.weaken Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.weaken
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_pos (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') :
∃ c' > 0, IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
⟨max c 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right c 1), h.weaken <| le_max_left c 1⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_pos Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_pos
theorem IsBigO.exists_pos (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c > 0, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.exists_pos
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_pos Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_pos
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_nonneg (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') :
∃ c' ≥ 0, IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
let ⟨c, cpos, hc⟩ := h.exists_pos
⟨c, le_of_lt cpos, hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_nonneg Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_nonneg
theorem IsBigO.exists_nonneg (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c ≥ 0, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.exists_nonneg
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_nonneg Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_nonneg
/-- `f = O(g)` if and only if `IsBigOWith c f g` for all sufficiently large `c`. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ᶠ c in atTop, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.trans
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨c, fun _c' hc' => hc.weaken hc'⟩, fun h => h.exists⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_eventually_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith
/-- `f = O(g)` if and only if `∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖` for all sufficiently large `c`. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_eventually : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ᶠ c in atTop, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ :=
isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith.trans <| by simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_eventually Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_eventually
theorem IsBigO.exists_mem_basis {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : f =O[l] g')
(hb : l.HasBasis p s) :
∃ c > 0, ∃ i : ι, p i ∧ ∀ x ∈ s i, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ :=
flip Exists.imp h.exists_pos fun c h => by
simpa only [isBigOWith_iff, hb.eventually_iff, exists_prop] using h
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_mem_basis Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_mem_basis
theorem isBigOWith_inv (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c⁻¹ l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff' hc]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_inv Asymptotics.isBigOWith_inv
-- We prove this lemma with strange assumptions to get two lemmas below automatically
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (h₀ : (∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖f x‖) ∨ ∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖g x‖) :
f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
constructor
· rintro H (_ | n)
· refine (H.def one_pos).mono fun x h₀' => ?_
rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul]
refine h₀.elim (fun hf => (hf x).trans ?_) fun hg => hg x
rwa [one_mul] at h₀'
· have : (0 : ℝ) < n.succ := Nat.cast_pos.2 n.succ_pos
exact (isBigOWith_inv this).1 (H.def' <| inv_pos.2 this)
· refine fun H => isLittleO_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹ with ⟨n, hn⟩
have hn₀ : (0 : ℝ) < n := (inv_pos.2 ε0).trans hn
refine ((isBigOWith_inv hn₀).2 (H n)).bound.mono fun x hfg => ?_
refine hfg.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (inv_le_of_inv_le ε0 hn.le) ?_)
refine h₀.elim (fun hf => nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right ((hf x).trans hfg) ?_) fun h => h x
exact inv_pos.2 hn₀
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le_aux Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le : f =o[l] g' ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g' x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (Or.inr fun _x => norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le' : f' =o[l] g ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f' x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (Or.inl fun _x => norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le' Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le'
/-! ### Subsingleton -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem isLittleO_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E'] : f' =o[l] g' :=
IsLittleO.of_bound fun c hc => by simp [Subsingleton.elim (f' _) 0, mul_nonneg hc.le]
#align asymptotics.is_o_of_subsingleton Asymptotics.isLittleO_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem isBigO_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E'] : f' =O[l] g' :=
isLittleO_of_subsingleton.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_subsingleton Asymptotics.isBigO_of_subsingleton
section congr
variable {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F}
/-! ### Congruence -/
theorem isBigOWith_congr (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) :
IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁ ↔ IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
subst c₂
apply Filter.eventually_congr
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with _ e₁ e₂
rw [e₁, e₂]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_congr Asymptotics.isBigOWith_congr
theorem IsBigOWith.congr' (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁) (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ :=
(isBigOWith_congr hc hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr'
theorem IsBigOWith.congr (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁) (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x)
(hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ :=
h.congr' hc (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_left (h : IsBigOWith c l f₁ g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
IsBigOWith c l f₂ g :=
h.congr rfl hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_left
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_right (h : IsBigOWith c l f g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
IsBigOWith c l f g₂ :=
h.congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_right
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_const (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f g) (hc : c₁ = c₂) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f g :=
h.congr hc (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_const Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_const
theorem isBigO_congr (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ =O[l] g₁ ↔ f₂ =O[l] g₂ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun c => isBigOWith_congr rfl hf hg
#align asymptotics.is_O_congr Asymptotics.isBigO_congr
theorem IsBigO.congr' (h : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₂ =O[l] g₂ :=
(isBigO_congr hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr' Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr'
theorem IsBigO.congr (h : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
f₂ =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr
theorem IsBigO.congr_left (h : f₁ =O[l] g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₂ =O[l] g :=
h.congr hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_left
theorem IsBigO.congr_right (h : f =O[l] g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : f =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_right
theorem isLittleO_congr (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ =o[l] g₁ ↔ f₂ =o[l] g₂ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun c _hc => isBigOWith_congr (Eq.refl c) hf hg
#align asymptotics.is_o_congr Asymptotics.isLittleO_congr
theorem IsLittleO.congr' (h : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₂ =o[l] g₂ :=
(isLittleO_congr hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr'
theorem IsLittleO.congr (h : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
f₂ =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr
theorem IsLittleO.congr_left (h : f₁ =o[l] g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₂ =o[l] g :=
h.congr hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_left
theorem IsLittleO.congr_right (h : f =o[l] g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : f =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_right
@[trans]
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h : f₂ =O[l] g) : f₁ =O[l] g :=
h.congr' hf.symm EventuallyEq.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_is_O Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO
instance transEventuallyEqIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → E) (α → F) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO
@[trans]
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h : f₂ =o[l] g) : f₁ =o[l] g :=
h.congr' hf.symm EventuallyEq.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_is_o Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO
instance transEventuallyEqIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → E) (α → F) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq {f : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F} (h : f =O[l] g₁) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) :
f =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' EventuallyEq.rfl hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_eventually_eq Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq
instance transIsBigOEventuallyEq :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → F) (· =O[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq {f : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F} (h : f =o[l] g₁)
(hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' EventuallyEq.rfl hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_eventually_eq Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq
instance transIsLittleOEventuallyEq :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → F) (· =o[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq
end congr
/-! ### Filter operations and transitivity -/
theorem IsBigOWith.comp_tendsto (hcfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β}
(hk : Tendsto k l' l) : IsBigOWith c l' (f ∘ k) (g ∘ k) :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| hk hcfg.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.comp_tendsto
theorem IsBigO.comp_tendsto (hfg : f =O[l] g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β} (hk : Tendsto k l' l) :
(f ∘ k) =O[l'] (g ∘ k) :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 <| hfg.isBigOWith.imp fun _c h => h.comp_tendsto hk
#align asymptotics.is_O.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigO.comp_tendsto
theorem IsLittleO.comp_tendsto (hfg : f =o[l] g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β} (hk : Tendsto k l' l) :
(f ∘ k) =o[l'] (g ∘ k) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (hfg.forall_isBigOWith cpos).comp_tendsto hk
#align asymptotics.is_o.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsLittleO.comp_tendsto
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
IsBigOWith c (map k l) f g ↔ IsBigOWith c l (f ∘ k) (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
exact eventually_map
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_map Asymptotics.isBigOWith_map
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} : f =O[map k l] g ↔ (f ∘ k) =O[l] (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, isBigOWith_map]
#align asymptotics.is_O_map Asymptotics.isBigO_map
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} : f =o[map k l] g ↔ (f ∘ k) =o[l] (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, isBigOWith_map]
#align asymptotics.is_o_map Asymptotics.isLittleO_map
theorem IsBigOWith.mono (h : IsBigOWith c l' f g) (hl : l ≤ l') : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| hl h.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.mono Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.mono
theorem IsBigO.mono (h : f =O[l'] g) (hl : l ≤ l') : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 <| h.isBigOWith.imp fun _c h => h.mono hl
#align asymptotics.is_O.mono Asymptotics.IsBigO.mono
theorem IsLittleO.mono (h : f =o[l'] g) (hl : l ≤ l') : f =o[l] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).mono hl
#align asymptotics.is_o.mono Asymptotics.IsLittleO.mono
theorem IsBigOWith.trans (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : IsBigOWith c' l g k) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith (c * c') l f k := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [hfg, hgk] with x hx hx'
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := hx
_ ≤ c * (c' * ‖k x‖) := by gcongr
_ = c * c' * ‖k x‖ := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =O[l] g) (hgk : g =O[l] k) :
f =O[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := hfg.exists_nonneg
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := hgk.isBigOWith
(hc.trans hc' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans
instance transIsBigOIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F') (α → G) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans
theorem IsLittleO.trans_isBigOWith (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : IsBigOWith c l g k) (hc : 0 < c) :
f =o[l] k := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c' c'pos
have : 0 < c' / c := div_pos c'pos hc
exact ((hfg this).trans hgk this.le).congr_const (div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc.ne')
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_isBigOWith
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans_isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G'} (hfg : f =o[l] g)
(hgk : g =O[l] k) : f =o[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cpos, hc⟩ := hgk.exists_pos
hfg.trans_isBigOWith hc cpos
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_isBigO
instance transIsLittleOIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → G') (· =o[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans_isBigO
theorem IsBigOWith.trans_isLittleO (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : g =o[l] k) (hc : 0 < c) :
f =o[l] k := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c' c'pos
have : 0 < c' / c := div_pos c'pos hc
exact (hfg.trans (hgk this) hc.le).congr_const (mul_div_cancel₀ _ hc.ne')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans_isLittleO {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =O[l] g)
(hgk : g =o[l] k) : f =o[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cpos, hc⟩ := hfg.exists_pos
hc.trans_isLittleO hgk cpos
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_isLittleO
instance transIsBigOIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F') (α → G) (· =O[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : g =o[l] k) :
f =o[l] k :=
hfg.trans_isBigOWith hgk.isBigOWith one_pos
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans
instance transIsLittleOIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → G) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.trans_isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G}
(hfg : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) (hgk : g =O[l] k) : f =O[l] k :=
(IsBigO.of_bound' hfg).trans hgk
#align filter.eventually.trans_is_O Filter.Eventually.trans_isBigO
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → ℝ} {l : Filter α}
(hfg : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound' <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans <| Real.le_norm_self _
#align filter.eventually.is_O Filter.Eventually.isBigO
section
variable (l)
theorem isBigOWith_of_le' (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| univ_mem' hfg
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_le' Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_le'
theorem isBigOWith_of_le (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
isBigOWith_of_le' l fun x => by
rw [one_mul]
exact hfg x
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_le Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_le
theorem isBigO_of_le' (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
(isBigOWith_of_le' l hfg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_le' Asymptotics.isBigO_of_le'
theorem isBigO_of_le (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
(isBigOWith_of_le l hfg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_le Asymptotics.isBigO_of_le
end
theorem isBigOWith_refl (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) : IsBigOWith 1 l f f :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _ => le_rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_refl Asymptotics.isBigOWith_refl
theorem isBigO_refl (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) : f =O[l] f :=
(isBigOWith_refl f l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_refl Asymptotics.isBigO_refl
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ =O[l] f₂ :=
hf.trans_isBigO (isBigO_refl _ _)
theorem IsBigOWith.trans_le (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f k :=
(hfg.trans (isBigOWith_of_le l hgk) hc).congr_const <| mul_one c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans_le Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans_le
theorem IsBigO.trans_le (hfg : f =O[l] g') (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g' x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) : f =O[l] k :=
hfg.trans (isBigO_of_le l hgk)
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_le Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_le
theorem IsLittleO.trans_le (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) : f =o[l] k :=
hfg.trans_isBigOWith (isBigOWith_of_le _ hgk) zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_le Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_le
theorem isLittleO_irrefl' (h : ∃ᶠ x in l, ‖f' x‖ ≠ 0) : ¬f' =o[l] f' := by
intro ho
rcases ((ho.bound one_half_pos).and_frequently h).exists with ⟨x, hle, hne⟩
rw [one_div, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at hle
exact (half_lt_self (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) hne.symm)).not_le hle
#align asymptotics.is_o_irrefl' Asymptotics.isLittleO_irrefl'
theorem isLittleO_irrefl (h : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) : ¬f'' =o[l] f'' :=
isLittleO_irrefl' <| h.mono fun _x => norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr
#align asymptotics.is_o_irrefl Asymptotics.isLittleO_irrefl
theorem IsBigO.not_isLittleO (h : f'' =O[l] g') (hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) :
¬g' =o[l] f'' := fun h' =>
isLittleO_irrefl hf (h.trans_isLittleO h')
#align asymptotics.is_O.not_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.not_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.not_isBigO (h : f'' =o[l] g') (hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) :
¬g' =O[l] f'' := fun h' =>
isLittleO_irrefl hf (h.trans_isBigO h')
#align asymptotics.is_o.not_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.not_isBigO
section Bot
variable (c f g)
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_bot : IsBigOWith c ⊥ f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| trivial
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_bot Asymptotics.isBigOWith_bot
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_bot : f =O[⊥] g :=
(isBigOWith_bot 1 f g).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_bot Asymptotics.isBigO_bot
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_bot : f =o[⊥] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun c _ => isBigOWith_bot c f g
#align asymptotics.is_o_bot Asymptotics.isLittleO_bot
end Bot
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_pure {x} : IsBigOWith c (pure x) f g ↔ ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_pure Asymptotics.isBigOWith_pure
theorem IsBigOWith.sup (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) (h' : IsBigOWith c l' f g) :
IsBigOWith c (l ⊔ l') f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| mem_sup.2 ⟨h.bound, h'.bound⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sup Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sup
theorem IsBigOWith.sup' (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (h' : IsBigOWith c' l' f g') :
IsBigOWith (max c c') (l ⊔ l') f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_sup.2 ⟨(h.weaken <| le_max_left c c').bound, (h'.weaken <| le_max_right c c').bound⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sup' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sup'
theorem IsBigO.sup (h : f =O[l] g') (h' : f =O[l'] g') : f =O[l ⊔ l'] g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := h'.isBigOWith
(hc.sup' hc').isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.sup Asymptotics.IsBigO.sup
theorem IsLittleO.sup (h : f =o[l] g) (h' : f =o[l'] g) : f =o[l ⊔ l'] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).sup (h'.forall_isBigOWith cpos)
#align asymptotics.is_o.sup Asymptotics.IsLittleO.sup
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_sup : f =O[l ⊔ l'] g' ↔ f =O[l] g' ∧ f =O[l'] g' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono le_sup_left, h.mono le_sup_right⟩, fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_sup Asymptotics.isBigO_sup
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_sup : f =o[l ⊔ l'] g ↔ f =o[l] g ∧ f =o[l'] g :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono le_sup_left, h.mono le_sup_right⟩, fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_sup Asymptotics.isLittleO_sup
theorem isBigOWith_insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {C : ℝ} {g : α → E} {g' : α → F}
(h : ‖g x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖) : IsBigOWith C (𝓝[insert x s] x) g g' ↔
IsBigOWith C (𝓝[s] x) g g' := by
simp_rw [IsBigOWith_def, nhdsWithin_insert, eventually_sup, eventually_pure, h, true_and_iff]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_insert Asymptotics.isBigOWith_insert
protected theorem IsBigOWith.insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {C : ℝ} {g : α → E}
{g' : α → F} (h1 : IsBigOWith C (𝓝[s] x) g g') (h2 : ‖g x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖) :
IsBigOWith C (𝓝[insert x s] x) g g' :=
(isBigOWith_insert h2).mpr h1
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.insert Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.insert
theorem isLittleO_insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {g : α → E'} {g' : α → F'}
(h : g x = 0) : g =o[𝓝[insert x s] x] g' ↔ g =o[𝓝[s] x] g' := by
simp_rw [IsLittleO_def]
refine forall_congr' fun c => forall_congr' fun hc => ?_
rw [isBigOWith_insert]
rw [h, norm_zero]
exact mul_nonneg hc.le (norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_insert Asymptotics.isLittleO_insert
protected theorem IsLittleO.insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {g : α → E'}
{g' : α → F'} (h1 : g =o[𝓝[s] x] g') (h2 : g x = 0) : g =o[𝓝[insert x s] x] g' :=
(isLittleO_insert h2).mpr h1
#align asymptotics.is_o.insert Asymptotics.IsLittleO.insert
/-! ### Simplification : norm, abs -/
section NormAbs
variable {u v : α → ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_norm_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f g' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_norm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_abs_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => |u x|) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f u :=
@isBigOWith_norm_right _ _ _ _ _ _ f u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_right, IsBigOWith.norm_right⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_right, IsBigOWith.abs_right⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_norm_right : (f =O[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f =O[l] g' := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_right Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_abs_right : (f =O[l] fun x => |u x|) ↔ f =O[l] u :=
@isBigO_norm_right _ _ ℝ _ _ _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_right Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_right, IsBigO.norm_right⟩ := isBigO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_right, IsBigO.abs_right⟩ := isBigO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_norm_right : (f =o[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f =o[l] g' := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_abs_right : (f =o[l] fun x => |u x|) ↔ f =o[l] u :=
@isLittleO_norm_right _ _ ℝ _ _ _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_right, IsLittleO.norm_right⟩ := isLittleO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_right, IsLittleO.abs_right⟩ := isLittleO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_norm_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => ‖f' x‖) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_norm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_abs_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => |u x|) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l u g :=
@isBigOWith_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_left, IsBigOWith.norm_left⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_left, IsBigOWith.abs_left⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_norm_left : (fun x => ‖f' x‖) =O[l] g ↔ f' =O[l] g := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_left Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_abs_left : (fun x => |u x|) =O[l] g ↔ u =O[l] g :=
@isBigO_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_left Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_left, IsBigO.norm_left⟩ := isBigO_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_left, IsBigO.abs_left⟩ := isBigO_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_norm_left : (fun x => ‖f' x‖) =o[l] g ↔ f' =o[l] g := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_abs_left : (fun x => |u x|) =o[l] g ↔ u =o[l] g :=
@isLittleO_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_left, IsLittleO.norm_left⟩ := isLittleO_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_left, IsLittleO.abs_left⟩ := isLittleO_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_left
theorem isBigOWith_norm_norm :
(IsBigOWith c l (fun x => ‖f' x‖) fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g' :=
isBigOWith_norm_left.trans isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_norm Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_norm
theorem isBigOWith_abs_abs :
(IsBigOWith c l (fun x => |u x|) fun x => |v x|) ↔ IsBigOWith c l u v :=
isBigOWith_abs_left.trans isBigOWith_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_abs Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_norm, IsBigOWith.norm_norm⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_abs, IsBigOWith.abs_abs⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_abs
theorem isBigO_norm_norm : ((fun x => ‖f' x‖) =O[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f' =O[l] g' :=
isBigO_norm_left.trans isBigO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_norm Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_norm
theorem isBigO_abs_abs : ((fun x => |u x|) =O[l] fun x => |v x|) ↔ u =O[l] v :=
isBigO_abs_left.trans isBigO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_abs Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_norm, IsBigO.norm_norm⟩ := isBigO_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_abs, IsBigO.abs_abs⟩ := isBigO_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_abs
theorem isLittleO_norm_norm : ((fun x => ‖f' x‖) =o[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f' =o[l] g' :=
isLittleO_norm_left.trans isLittleO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_norm Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_norm
theorem isLittleO_abs_abs : ((fun x => |u x|) =o[l] fun x => |v x|) ↔ u =o[l] v :=
isLittleO_abs_left.trans isLittleO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_abs Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_norm, IsLittleO.norm_norm⟩ := isLittleO_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_abs, IsLittleO.abs_abs⟩ := isLittleO_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_abs
end NormAbs
/-! ### Simplification: negate -/
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_neg_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => -g' x) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f g' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_neg]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_neg_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_neg_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_neg_right, IsBigOWith.neg_right⟩ := isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_neg_right : (f =O[l] fun x => -g' x) ↔ f =O[l] g' := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_neg_right Asymptotics.isBigO_neg_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_neg_right, IsBigO.neg_right⟩ := isBigO_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_neg_right : (f =o[l] fun x => -g' x) ↔ f =o[l] g' := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_neg_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_neg_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_neg_right, IsLittleO.neg_right⟩ := isLittleO_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.neg_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_neg_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => -f' x) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_neg]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_neg_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_neg_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_neg_left, IsBigOWith.neg_left⟩ := isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.neg_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_neg_left : (fun x => -f' x) =O[l] g ↔ f' =O[l] g := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_neg_left Asymptotics.isBigO_neg_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_neg_left, IsBigO.neg_left⟩ := isBigO_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.neg_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_neg_left : (fun x => -f' x) =o[l] g ↔ f' =o[l] g := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o_neg_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_neg_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_neg_left, IsLittleO.neg_left⟩ := isLittleO_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.neg_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.neg_left
/-! ### Product of functions (right) -/
theorem isBigOWith_fst_prod : IsBigOWith 1 l f' fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _x => le_max_left _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_fst_prod Asymptotics.isBigOWith_fst_prod
theorem isBigOWith_snd_prod : IsBigOWith 1 l g' fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _x => le_max_right _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_snd_prod Asymptotics.isBigOWith_snd_prod
theorem isBigO_fst_prod : f' =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_fst_prod.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_fst_prod Asymptotics.isBigO_fst_prod
theorem isBigO_snd_prod : g' =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_snd_prod.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_snd_prod Asymptotics.isBigO_snd_prod
theorem isBigO_fst_prod' {f' : α → E' × F'} : (fun x => (f' x).1) =O[l] f' := by
simpa [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def] using isBigO_fst_prod (E' := E') (F' := F')
#align asymptotics.is_O_fst_prod' Asymptotics.isBigO_fst_prod'
theorem isBigO_snd_prod' {f' : α → E' × F'} : (fun x => (f' x).2) =O[l] f' := by
simpa [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def] using isBigO_snd_prod (E' := E') (F' := F')
#align asymptotics.is_O_snd_prod' Asymptotics.isBigO_snd_prod'
section
variable (f' k')
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_rightl (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
(h.trans isBigOWith_fst_prod hc).congr_const (mul_one c)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_rightl
theorem IsBigO.prod_rightl (h : f =O[l] g') : f =O[l] fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(hc.prod_rightl k' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_rightl
theorem IsLittleO.prod_rightl (h : f =o[l] g') : f =o[l] fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).prod_rightl k' cpos.le
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_rightl
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_rightr (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
(h.trans isBigOWith_snd_prod hc).congr_const (mul_one c)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_rightr
theorem IsBigO.prod_rightr (h : f =O[l] g') : f =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(hc.prod_rightr f' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_rightr
theorem IsLittleO.prod_rightr (h : f =o[l] g') : f =o[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).prod_rightr f' cpos.le
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_rightr
end
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_same (hf : IsBigOWith c l f' k') (hg : IsBigOWith c l g' k') :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' := by
rw [isBigOWith_iff] at *; filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x using max_le
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_same Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_same
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left (hf : IsBigOWith c l f' k') (hg : IsBigOWith c' l g' k') :
IsBigOWith (max c c') l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' :=
(hf.weaken <| le_max_left c c').prod_left_same (hg.weaken <| le_max_right c c')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_fst (h : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k') :
IsBigOWith c l f' k' :=
(isBigOWith_fst_prod.trans h zero_le_one).congr_const <| one_mul c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_fst
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_snd (h : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k') :
IsBigOWith c l g' k' :=
(isBigOWith_snd_prod.trans h zero_le_one).congr_const <| one_mul c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_snd
theorem isBigOWith_prod_left :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' k' ∧ IsBigOWith c l g' k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left_same h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_prod_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_prod_left
theorem IsBigO.prod_left (hf : f' =O[l] k') (hg : g' =O[l] k') : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' :=
let ⟨_c, hf⟩ := hf.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hg⟩ := hg.isBigOWith
(hf.prod_left hg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left
theorem IsBigO.prod_left_fst : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' → f' =O[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans isBigO_fst_prod
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left_fst
theorem IsBigO.prod_left_snd : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' → g' =O[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans isBigO_snd_prod
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left_snd
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_prod_left : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' ↔ f' =O[l] k' ∧ g' =O[l] k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_prod_left Asymptotics.isBigO_prod_left
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left (hf : f' =o[l] k') (hg : g' =o[l] k') :
(fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c hc =>
(hf.forall_isBigOWith hc).prod_left_same (hg.forall_isBigOWith hc)
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left_fst : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' → f' =o[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans_isLittleO isBigO_fst_prod
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left_fst
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left_snd : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' → g' =o[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans_isLittleO isBigO_snd_prod
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left_snd
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_prod_left : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' ↔ f' =o[l] k' ∧ g' =o[l] k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_prod_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_prod_left
theorem IsBigOWith.eq_zero_imp (h : IsBigOWith c l f'' g'') : ∀ᶠ x in l, g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 :=
Eventually.mono h.bound fun x hx hg => norm_le_zero_iff.1 <| by simpa [hg] using hx
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.eq_zero_imp Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.eq_zero_imp
theorem IsBigO.eq_zero_imp (h : f'' =O[l] g'') : ∀ᶠ x in l, g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 :=
let ⟨_C, hC⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hC.eq_zero_imp
#align asymptotics.is_O.eq_zero_imp Asymptotics.IsBigO.eq_zero_imp
/-! ### Addition and subtraction -/
section add_sub
variable {f₁ f₂ : α → E'} {g₁ g₂ : α → F'}
theorem IsBigOWith.add (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g) :
IsBigOWith (c₁ + c₂) l (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) g := by
rw [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [h₁, h₂] with x hx₁ hx₂ using
calc
‖f₁ x + f₂ x‖ ≤ c₁ * ‖g x‖ + c₂ * ‖g x‖ := norm_add_le_of_le hx₁ hx₂
_ = (c₁ + c₂) * ‖g x‖ := (add_mul _ _ _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.add Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.add
theorem IsBigO.add (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =O[l] g :=
let ⟨_c₁, hc₁⟩ := h₁.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c₂, hc₂⟩ := h₂.isBigOWith
(hc₁.add hc₂).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.add Asymptotics.IsBigO.add
theorem IsLittleO.add (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =o[l] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun c cpos =>
((h₁.forall_isBigOWith <| half_pos cpos).add (h₂.forall_isBigOWith <|
half_pos cpos)).congr_const (add_halves c)
#align asymptotics.is_o.add Asymptotics.IsLittleO.add
theorem IsLittleO.add_add (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =o[l] fun x => ‖g₁ x‖ + ‖g₂ x‖ := by
refine (h₁.trans_le fun x => ?_).add (h₂.trans_le ?_) <;> simp [abs_of_nonneg, add_nonneg]
#align asymptotics.is_o.add_add Asymptotics.IsLittleO.add_add
theorem IsBigO.add_isLittleO (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =O[l] g :=
h₁.add h₂.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.add_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.add_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.add_isBigO (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =O[l] g :=
h₁.isBigO.add h₂
#align asymptotics.is_o.add_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.add_isBigO
theorem IsBigOWith.add_isLittleO (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) (hc : c₁ < c₂) :
IsBigOWith c₂ l (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) g :=
(h₁.add (h₂.forall_isBigOWith (sub_pos.2 hc))).congr_const (add_sub_cancel _ _)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.add_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.add_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.add_isBigOWith (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g) (h₂ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₂ g) (hc : c₁ < c₂) :
IsBigOWith c₂ l (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) g :=
(h₂.add_isLittleO h₁ hc).congr_left fun _ => add_comm _ _
#align asymptotics.is_o.add_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.add_isBigOWith
theorem IsBigOWith.sub (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g) :
IsBigOWith (c₁ + c₂) l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add h₂.neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sub Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sub
theorem IsBigOWith.sub_isLittleO (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) (hc : c₁ < c₂) :
IsBigOWith c₂ l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add_isLittleO h₂.neg_left hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sub_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sub_isLittleO
theorem IsBigO.sub (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add h₂.neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.sub Asymptotics.IsBigO.sub
theorem IsLittleO.sub (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add h₂.neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.sub Asymptotics.IsLittleO.sub
end add_sub
/-!
### Lemmas about `IsBigO (f₁ - f₂) g l` / `IsLittleO (f₁ - f₂) g l` treated as a binary relation
-/
section IsBigOOAsRel
variable {f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → E'}
theorem IsBigOWith.symm (h : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g) :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) g :=
h.neg_left.congr_left fun _x => neg_sub _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.symm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.symm
theorem isBigOWith_comm :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) g :=
⟨IsBigOWith.symm, IsBigOWith.symm⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_comm Asymptotics.isBigOWith_comm
theorem IsBigO.symm (h : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) =O[l] g :=
h.neg_left.congr_left fun _x => neg_sub _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O.symm Asymptotics.IsBigO.symm
theorem isBigO_comm : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g ↔ (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) =O[l] g :=
⟨IsBigO.symm, IsBigO.symm⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_comm Asymptotics.isBigO_comm
theorem IsLittleO.symm (h : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) =o[l] g := by
simpa only [neg_sub] using h.neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.symm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.symm
theorem isLittleO_comm : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g ↔ (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) =o[l] g :=
⟨IsLittleO.symm, IsLittleO.symm⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_comm Asymptotics.isLittleO_comm
theorem IsBigOWith.triangle (h₁ : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g)
(h₂ : IsBigOWith c' l (fun x => f₂ x - f₃ x) g) :
IsBigOWith (c + c') l (fun x => f₁ x - f₃ x) g :=
(h₁.add h₂).congr_left fun _x => sub_add_sub_cancel _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.triangle Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.triangle
theorem IsBigO.triangle (h₁ : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g)
(h₂ : (fun x => f₂ x - f₃ x) =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x - f₃ x) =O[l] g :=
(h₁.add h₂).congr_left fun _x => sub_add_sub_cancel _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O.triangle Asymptotics.IsBigO.triangle
theorem IsLittleO.triangle (h₁ : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g)
(h₂ : (fun x => f₂ x - f₃ x) =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x - f₃ x) =o[l] g :=
(h₁.add h₂).congr_left fun _x => sub_add_sub_cancel _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_o.triangle Asymptotics.IsLittleO.triangle
theorem IsBigO.congr_of_sub (h : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g) : f₁ =O[l] g ↔ f₂ =O[l] g :=
⟨fun h' => (h'.sub h).congr_left fun _x => sub_sub_cancel _ _, fun h' =>
(h.add h').congr_left fun _x => sub_add_cancel _ _⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_of_sub Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_of_sub
theorem IsLittleO.congr_of_sub (h : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g) : f₁ =o[l] g ↔ f₂ =o[l] g :=
⟨fun h' => (h'.sub h).congr_left fun _x => sub_sub_cancel _ _, fun h' =>
(h.add h').congr_left fun _x => sub_add_cancel _ _⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_of_sub Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_of_sub
end IsBigOOAsRel
/-! ### Zero, one, and other constants -/
section ZeroConst
variable (g g' l)
theorem isLittleO_zero : (fun _x => (0 : E')) =o[l] g' :=
IsLittleO.of_bound fun c hc =>
univ_mem' fun x => by simpa using mul_nonneg hc.le (norm_nonneg <| g' x)
#align asymptotics.is_o_zero Asymptotics.isLittleO_zero
theorem isBigOWith_zero (hc : 0 ≤ c) : IsBigOWith c l (fun _x => (0 : E')) g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| univ_mem' fun x => by simpa using mul_nonneg hc (norm_nonneg <| g' x)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_zero Asymptotics.isBigOWith_zero
theorem isBigOWith_zero' : IsBigOWith 0 l (fun _x => (0 : E')) g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| univ_mem' fun x => by simp
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_zero' Asymptotics.isBigOWith_zero'
theorem isBigO_zero : (fun _x => (0 : E')) =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 ⟨0, isBigOWith_zero' _ _⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_zero Asymptotics.isBigO_zero
theorem isBigO_refl_left : (fun x => f' x - f' x) =O[l] g' :=
(isBigO_zero g' l).congr_left fun _x => (sub_self _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_refl_left Asymptotics.isBigO_refl_left
theorem isLittleO_refl_left : (fun x => f' x - f' x) =o[l] g' :=
(isLittleO_zero g' l).congr_left fun _x => (sub_self _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_o_refl_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_refl_left
variable {g g' l}
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_zero_right_iff : (IsBigOWith c l f'' fun _x => (0 : F')) ↔ f'' =ᶠ[l] 0 := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, exists_prop, true_and_iff, norm_zero, mul_zero,
norm_le_zero_iff, EventuallyEq, Pi.zero_apply]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_zero_right_iff Asymptotics.isBigOWith_zero_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_zero_right_iff : (f'' =O[l] fun _x => (0 : F')) ↔ f'' =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
isBigOWith_zero_right_iff.1 hc,
fun h => (isBigOWith_zero_right_iff.2 h : IsBigOWith 1 _ _ _).isBigO⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_zero_right_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_zero_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_zero_right_iff : (f'' =o[l] fun _x => (0 : F')) ↔ f'' =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => isBigO_zero_right_iff.1 h.isBigO,
fun h => IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c _hc => isBigOWith_zero_right_iff.2 h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_zero_right_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_zero_right_iff
theorem isBigOWith_const_const (c : E) {c' : F''} (hc' : c' ≠ 0) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith (‖c‖ / ‖c'‖) l (fun _x : α => c) fun _x => c' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
apply univ_mem'
intro x
rw [mem_setOf, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hc')]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_const_const Asymptotics.isBigOWith_const_const
theorem isBigO_const_const (c : E) {c' : F''} (hc' : c' ≠ 0) (l : Filter α) :
(fun _x : α => c) =O[l] fun _x => c' :=
(isBigOWith_const_const c hc' l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_const Asymptotics.isBigO_const_const
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_const_const_iff {c : E''} {c' : F''} (l : Filter α) [l.NeBot] :
((fun _x : α => c) =O[l] fun _x => c') ↔ c' = 0 → c = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne c' 0 with (rfl | hc')
· simp [EventuallyEq]
· simp [hc', isBigO_const_const _ hc']
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_const_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_const_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_pure {x} : f'' =O[pure x] g'' ↔ g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 :=
calc
f'' =O[pure x] g'' ↔ (fun _y : α => f'' x) =O[pure x] fun _ => g'' x := isBigO_congr rfl rfl
_ ↔ g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 := isBigO_const_const_iff _
#align asymptotics.is_O_pure Asymptotics.isBigO_pure
end ZeroConst
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_principal {s : Set α} : IsBigOWith c (𝓟 s) f g ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
rw [IsBigOWith_def, eventually_principal]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_principal Asymptotics.isBigOWith_principal
theorem isBigO_principal {s : Set α} : f =O[𝓟 s] g ↔ ∃ c, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp_rw [isBigO_iff, eventually_principal]
#align asymptotics.is_O_principal Asymptotics.isBigO_principal
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_principal {s : Set α} : f'' =o[𝓟 s] g' ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f'' x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ norm_le_zero_iff.1 ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· simp only [isLittleO_iff, isBigOWith_principal] at h
have : Tendsto (fun c : ℝ => c * ‖g' x‖) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) :=
((continuous_id.mul continuous_const).tendsto' _ _ (zero_mul _)).mono_left
inf_le_left
apply le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto tendsto_const_nhds this
apply eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 (eventually_of_forall (fun c hc ↦ ?_))
exact eventually_principal.1 (h hc) x hx
· apply (isLittleO_zero g' _).congr' ?_ EventuallyEq.rfl
exact fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).symm
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_top : IsBigOWith c ⊤ f g ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
rw [IsBigOWith_def, eventually_top]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_top Asymptotics.isBigOWith_top
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_top : f =O[⊤] g ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ := by
simp_rw [isBigO_iff, eventually_top]
#align asymptotics.is_O_top Asymptotics.isBigO_top
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_top : f'' =o[⊤] g' ↔ ∀ x, f'' x = 0 := by
simp only [← principal_univ, isLittleO_principal, mem_univ, forall_true_left]
#align asymptotics.is_o_top Asymptotics.isLittleO_top
section
variable (F)
variable [One F] [NormOneClass F]
theorem isBigOWith_const_one (c : E) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith ‖c‖ l (fun _x : α => c) fun _x => (1 : F) := by simp [isBigOWith_iff]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_const_one Asymptotics.isBigOWith_const_one
theorem isBigO_const_one (c : E) (l : Filter α) : (fun _x : α => c) =O[l] fun _x => (1 : F) :=
(isBigOWith_const_one F c l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_one Asymptotics.isBigO_const_one
theorem isLittleO_const_iff_isLittleO_one {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =o[l] fun _x => c) ↔ f =o[l] fun _x => (1 : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_isBigOWith (isBigOWith_const_one _ _ _) (norm_pos_iff.2 hc),
fun h => h.trans_isBigO <| isBigO_const_const _ hc _⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_iff_is_o_one Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_iff_isLittleO_one
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_one_iff : f' =o[l] (fun _x => 1 : α → F) ↔ Tendsto f' l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [isLittleO_iff, norm_one, mul_one, Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall.tendsto_right_iff,
Metric.mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right]
#align asymptotics.is_o_one_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_one_iff : f =O[l] (fun _x => 1 : α → F) ↔
IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => ‖f x‖ := by
simp only [isBigO_iff, norm_one, mul_one, IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map]
#align asymptotics.is_O_one_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_one_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Filter.IsBoundedUnder.isBigO_one⟩ := isBigO_one_iff
#align filter.is_bounded_under.is_O_one Filter.IsBoundedUnder.isBigO_one
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_one_left_iff : (fun _x => 1 : α → F) =o[l] f ↔ Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop :=
calc
(fun _x => 1 : α → F) =o[l] f ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖(1 : F)‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux <| Or.inl fun _x => by simp only [norm_one, zero_le_one]
_ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, True → ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ∈ Ici (n : ℝ) := by
simp only [norm_one, mul_one, true_imp_iff, mem_Ici]
_ ↔ Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop :=
atTop_hasCountableBasis_of_archimedean.1.tendsto_right_iff.symm
#align asymptotics.is_o_one_left_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_one_left_iff
theorem _root_.Filter.Tendsto.isBigO_one {c : E'} (h : Tendsto f' l (𝓝 c)) :
f' =O[l] (fun _x => 1 : α → F) :=
h.norm.isBoundedUnder_le.isBigO_one F
#align filter.tendsto.is_O_one Filter.Tendsto.isBigO_one
theorem IsBigO.trans_tendsto_nhds (hfg : f =O[l] g') {y : F'} (hg : Tendsto g' l (𝓝 y)) :
f =O[l] (fun _x => 1 : α → F) :=
hfg.trans <| hg.isBigO_one F
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_tendsto_nhds Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_tendsto_nhds
/-- The condition `f = O[𝓝[≠] a] 1` is equivalent to `f = O[𝓝 a] 1`. -/
lemma isBigO_one_nhds_ne_iff [TopologicalSpace α] {a : α} :
f =O[𝓝[≠] a] (fun _ ↦ 1 : α → F) ↔ f =O[𝓝 a] (fun _ ↦ 1 : α → F) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds⟩
simp only [isBigO_one_iff, IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
use max c ‖f a‖
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.mp hc] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne b a with rfl | hb'
· apply le_max_right
· exact (hb hb').trans (le_max_left ..)
end
theorem isLittleO_const_iff {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f'' =o[l] fun _x => c) ↔ Tendsto f'' l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_const_iff_isLittleO_one ℝ hc).trans (isLittleO_one_iff _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_iff
theorem isLittleO_id_const {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) : (fun x : E'' => x) =o[𝓝 0] fun _x => c :=
(isLittleO_const_iff hc).mpr (continuous_id.tendsto 0)
#align asymptotics.is_o_id_const Asymptotics.isLittleO_id_const
theorem _root_.Filter.IsBoundedUnder.isBigO_const (h : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ f))
{c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) : f =O[l] fun _x => c :=
(h.isBigO_one ℝ).trans (isBigO_const_const _ hc _)
#align filter.is_bounded_under.is_O_const Filter.IsBoundedUnder.isBigO_const
theorem isBigO_const_of_tendsto {y : E''} (h : Tendsto f'' l (𝓝 y)) {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
f'' =O[l] fun _x => c :=
h.norm.isBoundedUnder_le.isBigO_const hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_of_tendsto Asymptotics.isBigO_const_of_tendsto
theorem IsBigO.isBoundedUnder_le {c : F} (h : f =O[l] fun _x => c) :
IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ f) :=
let ⟨c', hc'⟩ := h.bound
⟨c' * ‖c‖, eventually_map.2 hc'⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.is_bounded_under_le Asymptotics.IsBigO.isBoundedUnder_le
theorem isBigO_const_of_ne {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =O[l] fun _x => c) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ f) :=
⟨fun h => h.isBoundedUnder_le, fun h => h.isBigO_const hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_of_ne Asymptotics.isBigO_const_of_ne
theorem isBigO_const_iff {c : F''} : (f'' =O[l] fun _x => c) ↔
(c = 0 → f'' =ᶠ[l] 0) ∧ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => ‖f'' x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨fun hc => isBigO_zero_right_iff.1 (by rwa [← hc]), h.isBoundedUnder_le⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hcf, hf⟩
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (hc | hc)
exacts [(hcf hc).trans_isBigO (isBigO_zero _ _), hf.isBigO_const hc]
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_const_iff
theorem isBigO_iff_isBoundedUnder_le_div (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, g'' x ≠ 0) :
f =O[l] g'' ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => ‖f x‖ / ‖g'' x‖ := by
simp only [isBigO_iff, IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map]
exact
exists_congr fun c =>
eventually_congr <| h.mono fun x hx => (div_le_iff <| norm_pos_iff.2 hx).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_is_bounded_under_le_div Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_isBoundedUnder_le_div
/-- `(fun x ↦ c) =O[l] f` if and only if `f` is bounded away from zero. -/
theorem isBigO_const_left_iff_pos_le_norm {c : E''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(fun _x => c) =O[l] f' ↔ ∃ b, 0 < b ∧ ∀ᶠ x in l, b ≤ ‖f' x‖ := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨‖c‖ / C, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hc) hC₀, ?_⟩
exact hC.bound.mono fun x => (div_le_iff' hC₀).2
· rintro ⟨b, hb₀, hb⟩
refine IsBigO.of_bound (‖c‖ / b) (hb.mono fun x hx => ?_)
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
exact le_mul_of_one_le_right (norm_nonneg _) ((one_le_div hb₀).2 hx)
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_left_iff_pos_le_norm Asymptotics.isBigO_const_left_iff_pos_le_norm
theorem IsBigO.trans_tendsto (hfg : f'' =O[l] g'') (hg : Tendsto g'' l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto f'' l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 <| hfg.trans_isLittleO <| (isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).2 hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_tendsto
theorem IsLittleO.trans_tendsto (hfg : f'' =o[l] g'') (hg : Tendsto g'' l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto f'' l (𝓝 0) :=
hfg.isBigO.trans_tendsto hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_tendsto Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_tendsto
/-! ### Multiplication by a constant -/
theorem isBigOWith_const_mul_self (c : R) (f : α → R) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith ‖c‖ l (fun x => c * f x) f :=
isBigOWith_of_le' _ fun _x => norm_mul_le _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_const_mul_self Asymptotics.isBigOWith_const_mul_self
theorem isBigO_const_mul_self (c : R) (f : α → R) (l : Filter α) : (fun x => c * f x) =O[l] f :=
(isBigOWith_const_mul_self c f l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_self Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_self
theorem IsBigOWith.const_mul_left {f : α → R} (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) (c' : R) :
IsBigOWith (‖c'‖ * c) l (fun x => c' * f x) g :=
(isBigOWith_const_mul_self c' f l).trans h (norm_nonneg c')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.const_mul_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.const_mul_left
theorem IsBigO.const_mul_left {f : α → R} (h : f =O[l] g) (c' : R) : (fun x => c' * f x) =O[l] g :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
(hc.const_mul_left c').isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.const_mul_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.const_mul_left
theorem isBigOWith_self_const_mul' (u : Rˣ) (f : α → R) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith ‖(↑u⁻¹ : R)‖ l f fun x => ↑u * f x :=
(isBigOWith_const_mul_self ↑u⁻¹ (fun x ↦ ↑u * f x) l).congr_left
fun x ↦ u.inv_mul_cancel_left (f x)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_self_const_mul' Asymptotics.isBigOWith_self_const_mul'
theorem isBigOWith_self_const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hc : c ≠ 0) (f : α → 𝕜) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith ‖c‖⁻¹ l f fun x => c * f x :=
(isBigOWith_self_const_mul' (Units.mk0 c hc) f l).congr_const <| norm_inv c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_self_const_mul Asymptotics.isBigOWith_self_const_mul
theorem isBigO_self_const_mul' {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) (f : α → R) (l : Filter α) :
f =O[l] fun x => c * f x :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ (isBigOWith_self_const_mul' u f l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_self_const_mul' Asymptotics.isBigO_self_const_mul'
theorem isBigO_self_const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hc : c ≠ 0) (f : α → 𝕜) (l : Filter α) :
f =O[l] fun x => c * f x :=
isBigO_self_const_mul' (IsUnit.mk0 c hc) f l
#align asymptotics.is_O_self_const_mul Asymptotics.isBigO_self_const_mul
theorem isBigO_const_mul_left_iff' {f : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(fun x => c * f x) =O[l] g ↔ f =O[l] g :=
⟨(isBigO_self_const_mul' hc f l).trans, fun h => h.const_mul_left c⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_left_iff' Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_left_iff'
theorem isBigO_const_mul_left_iff {f : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(fun x => c * f x) =O[l] g ↔ f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_const_mul_left_iff' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_left_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_left_iff
theorem IsLittleO.const_mul_left {f : α → R} (h : f =o[l] g) (c : R) : (fun x => c * f x) =o[l] g :=
(isBigO_const_mul_self c f l).trans_isLittleO h
#align asymptotics.is_o.const_mul_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.const_mul_left
theorem isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff' {f : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(fun x => c * f x) =o[l] g ↔ f =o[l] g :=
⟨(isBigO_self_const_mul' hc f l).trans_isLittleO, fun h => h.const_mul_left c⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_mul_left_iff' Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff'
theorem isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff {f : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(fun x => c * f x) =o[l] g ↔ f =o[l] g :=
isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_mul_left_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff
theorem IsBigOWith.of_const_mul_right {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc' : 0 ≤ c')
(h : IsBigOWith c' l f fun x => c * g x) : IsBigOWith (c' * ‖c‖) l f g :=
h.trans (isBigOWith_const_mul_self c g l) hc'
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_const_mul_right
theorem IsBigO.of_const_mul_right {g : α → R} {c : R} (h : f =O[l] fun x => c * g x) : f =O[l] g :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(hc.of_const_mul_right cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_const_mul_right
theorem IsBigOWith.const_mul_right' {g : α → R} {u : Rˣ} {c' : ℝ} (hc' : 0 ≤ c')
(h : IsBigOWith c' l f g) : IsBigOWith (c' * ‖(↑u⁻¹ : R)‖) l f fun x => ↑u * g x :=
h.trans (isBigOWith_self_const_mul' _ _ _) hc'
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.const_mul_right' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.const_mul_right'
theorem IsBigOWith.const_mul_right {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) {c' : ℝ} (hc' : 0 ≤ c')
(h : IsBigOWith c' l f g) : IsBigOWith (c' * ‖c‖⁻¹) l f fun x => c * g x :=
h.trans (isBigOWith_self_const_mul c hc g l) hc'
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.const_mul_right
theorem IsBigO.const_mul_right' {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) (h : f =O[l] g) :
f =O[l] fun x => c * g x :=
h.trans (isBigO_self_const_mul' hc g l)
#align asymptotics.is_O.const_mul_right' Asymptotics.IsBigO.const_mul_right'
theorem IsBigO.const_mul_right {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (h : f =O[l] g) :
f =O[l] fun x => c * g x :=
h.const_mul_right' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_O.const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.const_mul_right
theorem isBigO_const_mul_right_iff' {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(f =O[l] fun x => c * g x) ↔ f =O[l] g :=
⟨fun h => h.of_const_mul_right, fun h => h.const_mul_right' hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_right_iff' Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_right_iff'
theorem isBigO_const_mul_right_iff {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =O[l] fun x => c * g x) ↔ f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_const_mul_right_iff' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_right_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_right_iff
theorem IsLittleO.of_const_mul_right {g : α → R} {c : R} (h : f =o[l] fun x => c * g x) :
f =o[l] g :=
h.trans_isBigO (isBigO_const_mul_self c g l)
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_const_mul_right
theorem IsLittleO.const_mul_right' {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) (h : f =o[l] g) :
f =o[l] fun x => c * g x :=
h.trans_isBigO (isBigO_self_const_mul' hc g l)
#align asymptotics.is_o.const_mul_right' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.const_mul_right'
theorem IsLittleO.const_mul_right {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (h : f =o[l] g) :
f =o[l] fun x => c * g x :=
h.const_mul_right' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.const_mul_right
theorem isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff' {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(f =o[l] fun x => c * g x) ↔ f =o[l] g :=
⟨fun h => h.of_const_mul_right, fun h => h.const_mul_right' hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_mul_right_iff' Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff'
theorem isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =o[l] fun x => c * g x) ↔ f =o[l] g :=
isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_mul_right_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff
/-! ### Multiplication -/
theorem IsBigOWith.mul {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} {c₁ c₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁)
(h₂ : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂) :
IsBigOWith (c₁ * c₂) l (fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [h₁, h₂] with _ hx₁ hx₂
apply le_trans (norm_mul_le _ _)
convert mul_le_mul hx₁ hx₂ (norm_nonneg _) (le_trans (norm_nonneg _) hx₁) using 1
rw [norm_mul, mul_mul_mul_comm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.mul Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.mul
theorem IsBigO.mul {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) =O[l] fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h₁.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := h₂.isBigOWith
(hc.mul hc').isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.mul Asymptotics.IsBigO.mul
theorem IsBigO.mul_isLittleO {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) =o[l] fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c cpos
rcases h₁.exists_pos with ⟨c', c'pos, hc'⟩
exact (hc'.mul (h₂ (div_pos cpos c'pos))).congr_const (mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt c'pos))
#align asymptotics.is_O.mul_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.mul_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.mul_isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) =o[l] fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c cpos
rcases h₂.exists_pos with ⟨c', c'pos, hc'⟩
exact ((h₁ (div_pos cpos c'pos)).mul hc').congr_const (div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt c'pos))
#align asymptotics.is_o.mul_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.mul_isBigO
theorem IsLittleO.mul {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) =o[l] fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x :=
h₁.mul_isBigO h₂.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.mul Asymptotics.IsLittleO.mul
theorem IsBigOWith.pow' {f : α → R} {g : α → 𝕜} (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) :
∀ n : ℕ, IsBigOWith (Nat.casesOn n ‖(1 : R)‖ fun n => c ^ (n + 1))
l (fun x => f x ^ n) fun x => g x ^ n
| 0 => by simpa using isBigOWith_const_const (1 : R) (one_ne_zero' 𝕜) l
| 1 => by simpa
| n + 2 => by simpa [pow_succ] using (IsBigOWith.pow' h (n + 1)).mul h
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.pow' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.pow'
theorem IsBigOWith.pow [NormOneClass R] {f : α → R} {g : α → 𝕜} (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) :
∀ n : ℕ, IsBigOWith (c ^ n) l (fun x => f x ^ n) fun x => g x ^ n
| 0 => by simpa using h.pow' 0
| n + 1 => h.pow' (n + 1)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.pow Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.pow
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/Asymptotics.lean | 1,669 | 1,677 | theorem IsBigOWith.of_pow {n : ℕ} {f : α → 𝕜} {g : α → R} (h : IsBigOWith c l (f ^ n) (g ^ n))
(hn : n ≠ 0) (hc : c ≤ c' ^ n) (hc' : 0 ≤ c') : IsBigOWith c' l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| (h.weaken hc).bound.mono fun x hx ↦
le_of_pow_le_pow_left hn (by positivity) <|
calc
‖f x‖ ^ n = ‖f x ^ n‖ := (norm_pow _ _).symm
_ ≤ c' ^ n * ‖g x ^ n‖ := hx
_ ≤ c' ^ n * ‖g x‖ ^ n := by | gcongr; exact norm_pow_le' _ hn.bot_lt
_ = (c' * ‖g x‖) ^ n := (mul_pow _ _ _).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
#align_import algebra.order.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"afdb43429311b885a7988ea15d0bac2aac80f69c"
/-!
# Floor and ceil
## Summary
We define the natural- and integer-valued floor and ceil functions on linearly ordered rings.
## Main Definitions
* `FloorSemiring`: An ordered semiring with natural-valued floor and ceil.
* `Nat.floor a`: Greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. Equal to `0` if `a < 0`.
* `Nat.ceil a`: Least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n`.
* `FloorRing`: A linearly ordered ring with integer-valued floor and ceil.
* `Int.floor a`: Greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`.
* `Int.ceil a`: Least integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`.
* `Int.fract a`: Fractional part of `a`, defined as `a - floor a`.
* `round a`: Nearest integer to `a`. It rounds halves towards infinity.
## Notations
* `⌊a⌋₊` is `Nat.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉₊` is `Nat.ceil a`.
* `⌊a⌋` is `Int.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉` is `Int.ceil a`.
The index `₊` in the notations for `Nat.floor` and `Nat.ceil` is used in analogy to the notation
for `nnnorm`.
## TODO
`LinearOrderedRing`/`LinearOrderedSemiring` can be relaxed to `OrderedRing`/`OrderedSemiring` in
many lemmas.
## Tags
rounding, floor, ceil
-/
open Set
variable {F α β : Type*}
/-! ### Floor semiring -/
/-- A `FloorSemiring` is an ordered semiring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℕ` satisfying `∀ (n : ℕ) (x : α), n ≤ ⌊x⌋ ↔ (n : α) ≤ x)`.
Note that many lemmas require a `LinearOrder`. Please see the above `TODO`. -/
class FloorSemiring (α) [OrderedSemiring α] where
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor a` computes the greatest natural `n` such that `(n : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil a` computes the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ (n : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor` of a negative element is zero. -/
floor_of_neg {a : α} (ha : a < 0) : floor a = 0
/-- A natural number `n` is smaller than `FloorSemiring.floor a` iff its coercion to `α` is
smaller than `a`. -/
gc_floor {a : α} {n : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ floor a ↔ (n : α) ≤ a
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℕ → α`. -/
gc_ceil : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_semiring FloorSemiring
instance : FloorSemiring ℕ where
floor := id
ceil := id
floor_of_neg ha := (Nat.not_lt_zero _ ha).elim
gc_floor _ := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil n a := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
namespace Nat
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
/-- `⌊a⌋₊` is the greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. If `a` is negative, then `⌊a⌋₊ = 0`. -/
def floor : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.floor
#align nat.floor Nat.floor
/-- `⌈a⌉₊` is the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n` -/
def ceil : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.ceil
#align nat.ceil Nat.ceil
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat : (Nat.floor : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.floor_nat Nat.floor_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_nat : (Nat.ceil : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.ceil_nat Nat.ceil_nat
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋₊" => Nat.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉₊" => Nat.ceil a
end OrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
theorem le_floor_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a :=
FloorSemiring.gc_floor ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff Nat.le_floor_iff
theorem le_floor (h : (n : α) ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ :=
(le_floor_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h).2 h
#align nat.le_floor Nat.le_floor
theorem floor_lt (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.floor_lt Nat.floor_lt
theorem floor_lt_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
(floor_lt ha).trans <| by rw [Nat.cast_one]
#align nat.floor_lt_one Nat.floor_lt_one
theorem lt_of_floor_lt (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < n) : a < n :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' => (le_floor h').not_lt h
#align nat.lt_of_floor_lt Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
theorem lt_one_of_floor_lt_one (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1) : a < 1 := mod_cast lt_of_floor_lt h
#align nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one Nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one
theorem floor_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : α) ≤ a :=
(le_floor_iff ha).1 le_rfl
#align nat.floor_le Nat.floor_le
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊.succ :=
lt_of_floor_lt <| Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align nat.lt_succ_floor Nat.lt_succ_floor
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by simpa using lt_succ_floor a
#align nat.lt_floor_add_one Nat.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor_iff, Nat.cast_le]
exact n.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_coe Nat.floor_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-08")] alias floor_coe := floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_zero Nat.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_one Nat.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
Nat.floor_natCast _
theorem floor_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 :=
ha.lt_or_eq.elim FloorSemiring.floor_of_neg <| by
rintro rfl
exact floor_zero
#align nat.floor_of_nonpos Nat.floor_of_nonpos
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℕ) := fun a b h => by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact le_floor ((floor_le ha).trans h)
#align nat.floor_mono Nat.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋₊ ≤ ⌊y⌋₊ := floor_mono
theorem le_floor_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact
iff_of_false (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn).not_le
(not_le_of_lt <| ha.trans_lt <| cast_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
· exact le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff' Nat.le_floor_iff'
@[simp]
theorem one_le_floor_iff (x : α) : 1 ≤ ⌊x⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
mod_cast @le_floor_iff' α _ _ x 1 one_ne_zero
#align nat.one_le_floor_iff Nat.one_le_floor_iff
theorem floor_lt' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff' hn
#align nat.floor_lt' Nat.floor_lt'
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero`
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero, cast_one]
#align nat.floor_pos Nat.floor_pos
theorem pos_of_floor_pos (h : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊) : 0 < a :=
(le_or_lt a 0).resolve_left fun ha => lt_irrefl 0 <| by rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha] at h
#align nat.pos_of_floor_pos Nat.pos_of_floor_pos
theorem lt_of_lt_floor (h : n < ⌊a⌋₊) : ↑n < a :=
(Nat.cast_lt.2 h).trans_le <| floor_le (pos_of_floor_pos <| (Nat.zero_le n).trans_lt h).le
#align nat.lt_of_lt_floor Nat.lt_of_lt_floor
theorem floor_le_of_le (h : a ≤ n) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ n :=
le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.2 lt_of_lt_floor h
#align nat.floor_le_of_le Nat.floor_le_of_le
theorem floor_le_one_of_le_one (h : a ≤ 1) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ 1 :=
floor_le_of_le <| h.trans_eq <| Nat.cast_one.symm
#align nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one Nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← lt_one_iff, ← @cast_one α]
exact floor_lt' Nat.one_ne_zero
#align nat.floor_eq_zero Nat.floor_eq_zero
theorem floor_eq_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff ha, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt ha, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff Nat.floor_eq_iff
theorem floor_eq_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff' hn, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt' (Nat.add_one_ne_zero n),
Nat.lt_add_one_iff, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff' Nat.floor_eq_iff'
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℕ) : ∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), ⌊a⌋₊ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
(floor_eq_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h₀).mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℕ) :
∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), (⌊a⌋₊ : α) = n :=
fun x hx => mod_cast floor_eq_on_Ico n x hx
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico' Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico'
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_zero : (floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iio 1 :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_floor_zero Nat.preimage_floor_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(n:α)`
theorem preimage_floor_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ico (n:α) (n + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff' hn
#align nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection (ceil : α → ℕ) (↑) :=
FloorSemiring.gc_ceil
#align nat.gc_ceil_coe Nat.gc_ceil_coe
@[simp]
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n :=
gc_ceil_coe _ _
#align nat.ceil_le Nat.ceil_le
theorem lt_ceil : n < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align nat.lt_ceil Nat.lt_ceil
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : n + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a := by
rw [← Nat.lt_ceil, Nat.add_one_le_iff]
#align nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add 1, Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.one_le_ceil_iff Nat.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one Nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ :=
ceil_le.1 le_rfl
#align nat.le_ceil Nat.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α] (z : ℤ) :
⌈(z : α)⌉₊ = z.toNat :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
simp only [ceil_le, Int.toNat_le]
norm_cast
#align nat.ceil_int_cast Nat.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, cast_le]
#align nat.ceil_nat_cast Nat.ceil_natCast
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℕ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align nat.ceil_mono Nat.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉₊ ≤ ⌈y⌉₊ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_zero Nat.ceil_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_one : ⌈(1 : α)⌉₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_one Nat.ceil_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌉₊ = n := ceil_natCast n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_zero : ⌈a⌉₊ = 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by rw [← Nat.le_zero, ceil_le, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_eq_zero Nat.ceil_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_pos Nat.ceil_pos
theorem lt_of_ceil_lt (h : ⌈a⌉₊ < n) : a < n :=
(le_ceil a).trans_lt (Nat.cast_lt.2 h)
#align nat.lt_of_ceil_lt Nat.lt_of_ceil_lt
theorem le_of_ceil_le (h : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n) : a ≤ n :=
(le_ceil a).trans (Nat.cast_le.2 h)
#align nat.le_of_ceil_le Nat.le_of_ceil_le
theorem floor_le_ceil (a : α) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact cast_le.1 ((floor_le ha).trans <| le_ceil _)
#align nat.floor_le_ceil Nat.floor_le_ceil
theorem floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos {a b : α} (h : a < b) (h' : 0 < b) : ⌊a⌋₊ < ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 a with (ha | ha)
· rw [floor_lt ha]
exact h.trans_le (le_ceil _)
· rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha.le, lt_ceil, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos Nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos
theorem ceil_eq_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌈a⌉₊ = n ↔ ↑(n - 1) < a ∧ a ≤ n := by
rw [← ceil_le, ← not_le, ← ceil_le, not_le,
tsub_lt_iff_right (Nat.add_one_le_iff.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hn)), Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.ceil_eq_iff Nat.ceil_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ceil_zero : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iic 0 :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_ceil_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(↑(n - 1))`
theorem preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ioc (↑(n - 1) : α) n :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_iff hn
#align nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Intervals -/
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioo a b = Set.Ioo ⌊a⌋₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioo Nat.preimage_Ioo
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico {a b : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ico a b = Set.Ico ⌈a⌉₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Ico Nat.preimage_Ico
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioc a b = Set.Ioc ⌊a⌋₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, le_floor_iff, hb, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioc Nat.preimage_Ioc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc {a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Icc a b = Set.Icc ⌈a⌉₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, hb, le_floor_iff]
#align nat.preimage_Icc Nat.preimage_Icc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioi a = Set.Ioi ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioi Nat.preimage_Ioi
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ici a = Set.Ici ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le]
#align nat.preimage_Ici Nat.preimage_Ici
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iio a = Set.Iio ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Iio Nat.preimage_Iio
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iic a = Set.Iic ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [le_floor_iff, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Iic Nat.preimage_Iic
theorem floor_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by
rw [le_floor_iff (add_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg)]
obtain hb | hb := le_total n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_le_add_iff_right, add_le_add_iff_right,
le_floor_iff ha]
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_left_comm _ b, add_left_comm _ (b : α)]
refine iff_of_true ?_ le_self_add
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right <| ha.trans <| le_add_of_nonneg_right d.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_add_nat Nat.floor_add_nat
theorem floor_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a + 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_nat ha 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.floor_add_one Nat.floor_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat ha n
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
⌊a - n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - n := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha, floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le (ha.trans n.cast_nonneg)), zero_tsub]
rcases le_total a n with h | h
· rw [floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le h), eq_comm, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le]
exact Nat.cast_le.1 ((Nat.floor_le ha).trans h)
· rw [eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le (le_floor h), ← floor_add_nat _, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_left ((add_zero _).trans_le h)
#align nat.floor_sub_nat Nat.floor_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_one [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - 1 :=
mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by
rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, not_iff_not, lt_ceil]
obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_lt_add_iff_right, add_lt_add_iff_right,
lt_ceil]
· exact iff_of_true (lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt ha <| cast_lt.2 hb) (Nat.lt_add_left _ hb)
#align nat.ceil_add_nat Nat.ceil_add_nat
theorem ceil_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌈a + 1⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_nat ha 1`
rw [cast_one.symm, ceil_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.ceil_add_one Nat.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat ha n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : α) < a + 1 :=
lt_ceil.1 <| (Nat.lt_succ_self _).trans_le (ceil_add_one ha).ge
#align nat.ceil_lt_add_one Nat.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ + ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add]
exact _root_.add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align nat.ceil_add_le Nat.ceil_add_le
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋₊ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| lt_floor_add_one a
#align nat.sub_one_lt_floor Nat.sub_one_lt_floor
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [LinearOrderedSemifield α] [FloorSemiring α]
-- TODO: should these lemmas be `simp`? `norm_cast`?
theorem floor_div_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a / n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / n := by
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha
· rw [floor_of_nonpos, floor_of_nonpos ha]
· simp
apply div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· rw [cast_zero, div_zero, Nat.div_zero, floor_zero]
refine (floor_eq_iff ?_).2 ?_
· exact div_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
constructor
· exact cast_div_le.trans (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (floor_le ha) n.cast_nonneg)
rw [div_lt_iff, add_mul, one_mul, ← cast_mul, ← cast_add, ← floor_lt ha]
· exact lt_div_mul_add hn
· exact cast_pos.2 hn
#align nat.floor_div_nat Nat.floor_div_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_div_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a / (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_div_nat a n
/-- Natural division is the floor of field division. -/
theorem floor_div_eq_div (m n : ℕ) : ⌊(m : α) / n⌋₊ = m / n := by
convert floor_div_nat (m : α) n
rw [m.floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_div_eq_div Nat.floor_div_eq_div
end LinearOrderedSemifield
end Nat
/-- There exists at most one `FloorSemiring` structure on a linear ordered semiring. -/
theorem subsingleton_floorSemiring {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] :
Subsingleton (FloorSemiring α) := by
refine ⟨fun H₁ H₂ => ?_⟩
have : H₁.ceil = H₂.ceil := funext fun a => (H₁.gc_ceil.l_unique H₂.gc_ceil) fun n => rfl
have : H₁.floor = H₂.floor := by
ext a
cases' lt_or_le a 0 with h h
· rw [H₁.floor_of_neg, H₂.floor_of_neg] <;> exact h
· refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun n => ?_
rw [H₁.gc_floor, H₂.gc_floor] <;> exact h
cases H₁
cases H₂
congr
#align subsingleton_floor_semiring subsingleton_floorSemiring
/-! ### Floor rings -/
/-- A `FloorRing` is a linear ordered ring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℤ` satisfying `∀ (z : ℤ) (a : α), z ≤ floor a ↔ (z : α) ≤ a)`.
-/
class FloorRing (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] where
/-- `FloorRing.floor a` computes the greatest integer `z` such that `(z : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil a` computes the least integer `z` such that `a ≤ (z : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the upper adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_ring FloorRing
instance : FloorRing ℤ where
floor := id
ceil := id
gc_coe_floor a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil_coe a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `floor` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofFloor (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (floor : α → ℤ)
(gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor
ceil := fun a => -floor (-a)
gc_coe_floor
gc_ceil_coe := fun a z => by rw [neg_le, ← gc_coe_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff] }
#align floor_ring.of_floor FloorRing.ofFloor
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `ceil` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofCeil (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (ceil : α → ℤ)
(gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor := fun a => -ceil (-a)
ceil
gc_coe_floor := fun a z => by rw [le_neg, gc_ceil_coe, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
gc_ceil_coe }
#align floor_ring.of_ceil FloorRing.ofCeil
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α] {z : ℤ} {a : α}
/-- `Int.floor a` is the greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`. It is denoted with `⌊a⌋`. -/
def floor : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.floor
#align int.floor Int.floor
/-- `Int.ceil a` is the smallest integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`. It is denoted with `⌈a⌉`. -/
def ceil : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.ceil
#align int.ceil Int.ceil
/-- `Int.fract a`, the fractional part of `a`, is `a` minus its floor. -/
def fract (a : α) : α :=
a - floor a
#align int.fract Int.fract
@[simp]
theorem floor_int : (Int.floor : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.floor_int Int.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_int : (Int.ceil : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_int Int.ceil_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_int : (Int.fract : ℤ → ℤ) = 0 :=
funext fun x => by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_int Int.fract_int
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋" => Int.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉" => Int.ceil a
-- Mathematical notation for `fract a` is usually `{a}`. Let's not even go there.
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_floor_eq : @FloorRing.floor = @Int.floor :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_floor_eq Int.floorRing_floor_eq
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_ceil_eq : @FloorRing.ceil = @Int.ceil :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_ceil_eq Int.floorRing_ceil_eq
/-! #### Floor -/
theorem gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection ((↑) : ℤ → α) floor :=
FloorRing.gc_coe_floor
#align int.gc_coe_floor Int.gc_coe_floor
theorem le_floor : z ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ (z : α) ≤ a :=
(gc_coe_floor z a).symm
#align int.le_floor Int.le_floor
theorem floor_lt : ⌊a⌋ < z ↔ a < z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_floor
#align int.floor_lt Int.floor_lt
theorem floor_le (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a :=
gc_coe_floor.l_u_le a
#align int.floor_le Int.floor_le
theorem floor_nonneg : 0 ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ 0 ≤ a := by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_zero]
#align int.floor_nonneg Int.floor_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_sub_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ z - 1 ↔ a < z := by rw [← floor_lt, le_sub_one_iff]
#align int.floor_le_sub_one_iff Int.floor_le_sub_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_neg_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
rw [← zero_sub (1 : ℤ), floor_le_sub_one_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.floor_le_neg_one_iff Int.floor_le_neg_one_iff
theorem floor_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ 0 := by
rw [← @cast_le α, Int.cast_zero]
exact (floor_le a).trans ha
#align int.floor_nonpos Int.floor_nonpos
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋.succ :=
floor_lt.1 <| Int.lt_succ_self _
#align int.lt_succ_floor Int.lt_succ_floor
@[simp]
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
simpa only [Int.succ, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one] using lt_succ_floor a
#align int.lt_floor_add_one Int.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (lt_floor_add_one a)
#align int.sub_one_lt_floor Int.sub_one_lt_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌊(z : α)⌋ = z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_le]
#align int.floor_int_cast Int.floor_intCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.floor_nat_cast Int.floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_zero Int.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_one Int.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌋ = n :=
floor_natCast n
@[mono]
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℤ) :=
gc_coe_floor.monotone_u
#align int.floor_mono Int.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋ ≤ ⌊y⌋ := floor_mono
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor`
rw [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor, cast_one]
#align int.floor_pos Int.floor_pos
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a + z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub]
#align int.floor_add_int Int.floor_add_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌊a + 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_int a 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_one Int.floor_add_one
theorem le_floor_add (a b : α) : ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ ≤ ⌊a + b⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (floor_le _) (floor_le _)
#align int.le_floor_add Int.le_floor_add
theorem le_floor_add_floor (a b : α) : ⌊a + b⌋ - 1 ≤ ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ := by
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub, sub_le_comm, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
refine le_trans ?_ (sub_one_lt_floor _).le
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', ← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
exact floor_le _
#align int.le_floor_add_floor Int.le_floor_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_int_add (z : ℤ) (a : α) : ⌊↑z + a⌋ = z + ⌊a⌋ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using floor_add_int a z
#align int.floor_int_add Int.floor_int_add
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_nat Int.floor_add_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ⌊↑n + a⌋ = n + ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_int_add]
#align int.floor_nat_add Int.floor_nat_add
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a⌋ = OfNat.ofNat n + ⌊a⌋ :=
floor_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a - z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (floor_add_int _ _)
#align int.floor_sub_int Int.floor_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a - n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_sub_int]
#align int.floor_sub_nat Int.floor_sub_nat
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_one (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - 1 := mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing α] [FloorRing α]
{a b : α} (h : ⌊a⌋ = ⌊b⌋) : |a - b| < 1 := by
have : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one a
have : b < ⌊b⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one b
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) = ⌊b⌋ := Int.cast_inj.2 h
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a := floor_le a
have : (⌊b⌋ : α) ≤ b := floor_le b
exact abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor Int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor
theorem floor_eq_iff : ⌊a⌋ = z ↔ ↑z ≤ a ∧ a < z + 1 := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, le_floor, ← Int.lt_add_one_iff, floor_lt, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
and_comm]
#align int.floor_eq_iff Int.floor_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero_iff : ⌊a⌋ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ico (0 : α) 1 := by simp [floor_eq_iff]
#align int.floor_eq_zero_iff Int.floor_eq_zero_iff
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), ⌊a⌋ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
floor_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico Int.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), (⌊a⌋ : α) = n := fun a ha =>
congr_arg _ <| floor_eq_on_Ico n a ha
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico' Int.floor_eq_on_Ico'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_singleton (m : ℤ) : (floor : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ico (m : α) (m + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_floor_singleton Int.preimage_floor_singleton
/-! #### Fractional part -/
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_floor (a : α) : a - ⌊a⌋ = fract a :=
rfl
#align int.self_sub_floor Int.self_sub_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_fract (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) + fract a = a :=
add_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.floor_add_fract Int.floor_add_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_floor (a : α) : fract a + ⌊a⌋ = a :=
sub_add_cancel _ _
#align int.fract_add_floor Int.fract_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_int Int.fract_add_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_nat (a : α) (m : ℕ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_nat Int.fract_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_one (a : α) : fract (a + 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_add_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem fract_int_add (m : ℤ) (a : α) : fract (↑m + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_int]
#align int.fract_int_add Int.fract_int_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : fract (↑n + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_one_add (a : α) : fract (1 + a) = fract a := mod_cast fract_nat_add 1 a
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a) = fract a :=
fract_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a - m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_int Int.fract_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : fract (a - n) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_nat Int.fract_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_one (a : α) : fract (a - 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_sub_nat a n
-- Was a duplicate lemma under a bad name
#align int.fract_int_nat Int.fract_int_add
theorem fract_add_le (a b : α) : fract (a + b) ≤ fract a + fract b := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_le_sub_iff_left, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_le]
exact le_floor_add _ _
#align int.fract_add_le Int.fract_add_le
theorem fract_add_fract_le (a b : α) : fract a + fract b ≤ fract (a + b) + 1 := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact mod_cast le_floor_add_floor a b
#align int.fract_add_fract_le Int.fract_add_fract_le
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_fract (a : α) : a - fract a = ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.self_sub_fract Int.self_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_self (a : α) : fract a - a = -⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel_left _ _
#align int.fract_sub_self Int.fract_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ fract a :=
sub_nonneg.2 <| floor_le _
#align int.fract_nonneg Int.fract_nonneg
/-- The fractional part of `a` is positive if and only if `a ≠ ⌊a⌋`. -/
lemma fract_pos : 0 < fract a ↔ a ≠ ⌊a⌋ :=
(fract_nonneg a).lt_iff_ne.trans <| ne_comm.trans sub_ne_zero
#align int.fract_pos Int.fract_pos
theorem fract_lt_one (a : α) : fract a < 1 :=
sub_lt_comm.1 <| sub_one_lt_floor _
#align int.fract_lt_one Int.fract_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem fract_zero : fract (0 : α) = 0 := by rw [fract, floor_zero, cast_zero, sub_self]
#align int.fract_zero Int.fract_zero
@[simp]
theorem fract_one : fract (1 : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_one Int.fract_one
theorem abs_fract : |fract a| = fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| fract_nonneg a
#align int.abs_fract Int.abs_fract
@[simp]
theorem abs_one_sub_fract : |1 - fract a| = 1 - fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| sub_nonneg.mpr (fract_lt_one a).le
#align int.abs_one_sub_fract Int.abs_one_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_intCast (z : ℤ) : fract (z : α) = 0 := by
unfold fract
rw [floor_intCast]
exact sub_self _
#align int.fract_int_cast Int.fract_intCast
@[simp]
theorem fract_natCast (n : ℕ) : fract (n : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_nat_cast Int.fract_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) : α) = 0 :=
fract_natCast n
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem fract_floor (a : α) : fract (⌊a⌋ : α) = 0 :=
fract_intCast _
#align int.fract_floor Int.fract_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_fract (a : α) : ⌊fract a⌋ = 0 := by
rw [floor_eq_iff, Int.cast_zero, zero_add]; exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.floor_fract Int.floor_fract
theorem fract_eq_iff {a b : α} : fract a = b ↔ 0 ≤ b ∧ b < 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, ⟨⌊a⌋, sub_sub_cancel _ _⟩⟩,
by
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, z, hz⟩
rw [← self_sub_floor, eq_comm, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_comm, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, hz,
Int.cast_inj, floor_eq_iff, ← hz]
constructor <;> simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc] ⟩
#align int.fract_eq_iff Int.fract_eq_iff
theorem fract_eq_fract {a b : α} : fract a = fract b ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => ⟨⌊a⌋ - ⌊b⌋, by unfold fract at h; rw [Int.cast_sub, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub.1 h]⟩,
by
rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
refine fract_eq_iff.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, z + ⌊b⌋, ?_⟩
rw [eq_add_of_sub_eq hz, add_comm, Int.cast_add]
exact add_sub_sub_cancel _ _ _⟩
#align int.fract_eq_fract Int.fract_eq_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_eq_self {a : α} : fract a = a ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ a < 1 :=
fract_eq_iff.trans <| and_assoc.symm.trans <| and_iff_left ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align int.fract_eq_self Int.fract_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (a : α) : fract (fract a) = fract a :=
fract_eq_self.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.fract_fract Int.fract_fract
theorem fract_add (a b : α) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract (a + b) - fract a - fract b = z :=
⟨⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ - ⌊a + b⌋, by
unfold fract
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, cast_add, cast_neg]
abel⟩
#align int.fract_add Int.fract_add
theorem fract_neg {x : α} (hx : fract x ≠ 0) : fract (-x) = 1 - fract x := by
rw [fract_eq_iff]
constructor
· rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, zero_add]
exact (fract_lt_one x).le
refine ⟨sub_lt_self _ (lt_of_le_of_ne' (fract_nonneg x) hx), -⌊x⌋ - 1, ?_⟩
simp only [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, cast_sub, cast_neg, cast_one, sub_left_inj]
conv in -x => rw [← floor_add_fract x]
simp [-floor_add_fract]
#align int.fract_neg Int.fract_neg
@[simp]
theorem fract_neg_eq_zero {x : α} : fract (-x) = 0 ↔ fract x = 0 := by
simp only [fract_eq_iff, le_refl, zero_lt_one, tsub_zero, true_and_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ <;> use -z <;> simp [← hz]
#align int.fract_neg_eq_zero Int.fract_neg_eq_zero
theorem fract_mul_nat (a : α) (b : ℕ) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract a * b - fract (a * b) = z := by
induction' b with c hc
· use 0; simp
· rcases hc with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, mul_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
rcases fract_add (a * c) a with ⟨y, hy⟩
use z - y
rw [Int.cast_sub, ← hz, ← hy]
abel
#align int.fract_mul_nat Int.fract_mul_nat
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
theorem preimage_fract (s : Set α) :
fract ⁻¹' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x => x - (m:α)) ⁻¹' (s ∩ Ico (0 : α) 1) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⌊x⌋, h, fract_nonneg x, fract_lt_one x⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨m, hms, hm0, hm1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊x⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 hm0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 hm1⟩
exact hms
#align int.preimage_fract Int.preimage_fract
theorem image_fract (s : Set α) : fract '' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x : α => x - m) '' s ∩ Ico 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_image, mem_inter_iff, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⌊y⌋, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, fract_nonneg y, fract_lt_one y⟩
· rintro ⟨m, ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩, h0, h1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊y⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 h0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 h1⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩
#align int.image_fract Int.image_fract
section LinearOrderedField
variable {k : Type*} [LinearOrderedField k] [FloorRing k] {b : k}
theorem fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico (a b : k) (ha : 0 < a) : fract (b / a) * a ∈ Ico 0 a :=
⟨(mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right ha).2 (fract_nonneg (b / a)),
(mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left ha).2 (fract_lt_one (b / a))⟩
#align int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico Int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico
theorem fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq (a b : k) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
fract (b / a) * a + ⌊b / a⌋ • a = b := by
rw [zsmul_eq_mul, ← add_mul, fract_add_floor, div_mul_cancel₀ b ha]
#align int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq Int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq
theorem sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg (a : k) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a - ⌊a / b⌋ * b :=
sub_nonneg_of_le <| (le_div_iff hb).1 <| floor_le _
#align int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg
theorem sub_floor_div_mul_lt (a : k) (hb : 0 < b) : a - ⌊a / b⌋ * b < b :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| by
-- Porting note: `← one_add_mul` worked in mathlib3 without the argument
rw [← one_add_mul _ b, ← div_lt_iff hb, add_comm]
exact lt_floor_add_one _
#align int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt
theorem fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod {m n : ℕ} : fract ((m : k) / n) = ↑(m % n) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
have hn' : 0 < (n : k) := by
norm_cast
refine fract_eq_iff.mpr ⟨?_, ?_, m / n, ?_⟩
· positivity
· simpa only [div_lt_one hn', Nat.cast_lt] using m.mod_lt hn
· rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← mul_right_inj' hn'.ne', mul_div_cancel₀ _ hn'.ne', mul_add,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ hn'.ne']
norm_cast
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Nat.mod_add_div m n]
#align int.fract_div_nat_cast_eq_div_nat_cast_mod Int.fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod
-- TODO Generalise this to allow `n : ℤ` using `Int.fmod` instead of `Int.mod`.
theorem fract_div_intCast_eq_div_intCast_mod {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} :
fract ((m : k) / n) = ↑(m % n) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
replace hn : 0 < (n : k) := by norm_cast
have : ∀ {l : ℤ}, 0 ≤ l → fract ((l : k) / n) = ↑(l % n) / n := by
intros l hl
obtain ⟨l₀, rfl | rfl⟩ := l.eq_nat_or_neg
· rw [cast_natCast, ← natCast_mod, cast_natCast, fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod]
· rw [Right.nonneg_neg_iff, natCast_nonpos_iff] at hl
simp [hl, zero_mod]
obtain ⟨m₀, rfl | rfl⟩ := m.eq_nat_or_neg
· exact this (ofNat_nonneg m₀)
let q := ⌈↑m₀ / (n : k)⌉
let m₁ := q * ↑n - (↑m₀ : ℤ)
have hm₁ : 0 ≤ m₁ := by
simpa [m₁, ← @cast_le k, ← div_le_iff hn] using FloorRing.gc_ceil_coe.le_u_l _
calc
fract ((Int.cast (-(m₀ : ℤ)) : k) / (n : k))
-- Porting note: the `rw [cast_neg, cast_natCast]` was `push_cast`
= fract (-(m₀ : k) / n) := by rw [cast_neg, cast_natCast]
_ = fract ((m₁ : k) / n) := ?_
_ = Int.cast (m₁ % (n : ℤ)) / Nat.cast n := this hm₁
_ = Int.cast (-(↑m₀ : ℤ) % ↑n) / Nat.cast n := ?_
· rw [← fract_int_add q, ← mul_div_cancel_right₀ (q : k) hn.ne', ← add_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
-- Porting note: the `simp` was `push_cast`
simp [m₁]
· congr 2
change (q * ↑n - (↑m₀ : ℤ)) % ↑n = _
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm (q * ↑n), add_mul_emod_self]
#align int.fract_div_int_cast_eq_div_int_cast_mod Int.fract_div_intCast_eq_div_intCast_mod
end LinearOrderedField
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil ((↑) : ℤ → α) :=
FloorRing.gc_ceil_coe
#align int.gc_ceil_coe Int.gc_ceil_coe
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉ ≤ z ↔ a ≤ z :=
gc_ceil_coe a z
#align int.ceil_le Int.ceil_le
theorem floor_neg : ⌊-a⌋ = -⌈a⌉ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun z => by rw [le_neg, ceil_le, le_floor, Int.cast_neg, le_neg]
#align int.floor_neg Int.floor_neg
theorem ceil_neg : ⌈-a⌉ = -⌊a⌋ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun z => by rw [neg_le, ceil_le, le_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le]
#align int.ceil_neg Int.ceil_neg
theorem lt_ceil : z < ⌈a⌉ ↔ (z : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align int.lt_ceil Int.lt_ceil
@[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : z + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉ ↔ (z : α) < a := by rw [← lt_ceil, add_one_le_iff]
#align int.add_one_le_ceil_iff Int.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add (1 : ℤ), add_one_le_ceil_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.one_le_ceil_iff Int.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉ ≤ ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align int.ceil_le_floor_add_one Int.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉ :=
gc_ceil_coe.le_u_l a
#align int.le_ceil Int.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌈(z : α)⌉ = z :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_le]
#align int.ceil_int_cast Int.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.ceil_nat_cast Int.ceil_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌉ = n := ceil_natCast n
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℤ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align int.ceil_mono Int.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉ ≤ ⌈y⌉ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈a + z⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + z := by
rw [← neg_inj, neg_add', ← floor_neg, ← floor_neg, neg_add', floor_sub_int]
#align int.ceil_add_int Int.ceil_add_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + n := by rw [← Int.cast_natCast, ceil_add_int]
#align int.ceil_add_nat Int.ceil_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a + 1⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_int a (1 : ℤ)`
rw [← ceil_add_int a (1 : ℤ), cast_one]
#align int.ceil_add_one Int.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈a - z⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (ceil_add_int _ _)
#align int.ceil_sub_int Int.ceil_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a - n⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - n := by
convert ceil_sub_int a n using 1
simp
#align int.ceil_sub_nat Int.ceil_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_one (a : α) : ⌈a - 1⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - 1 := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← ceil_add_one, sub_add_cancel]
#align int.ceil_sub_one Int.ceil_sub_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (a : α) : (⌈a⌉ : α) < a + 1 := by
rw [← lt_ceil, ← Int.cast_one, ceil_add_int]
apply lt_add_one
#align int.ceil_lt_add_one Int.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉ ≤ ⌈a⌉ + ⌈b⌉ := by
rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align int.ceil_add_le Int.ceil_add_le
theorem ceil_add_ceil_le (a b : α) : ⌈a⌉ + ⌈b⌉ ≤ ⌈a + b⌉ + 1 := by
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, ceil_le, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, le_sub_comm]
refine (ceil_lt_add_one _).le.trans ?_
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le', ← add_assoc, add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_ceil _
#align int.ceil_add_ceil_le Int.ceil_add_ceil_le
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align int.ceil_pos Int.ceil_pos
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,319 | 1,319 | theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉ = 0 := by | rw [← cast_zero, ceil_intCast]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Hanneke Wiersema. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Hanneke Wiersema
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Basic
/-!
# The cyclotomic character
Let `L` be an integral domain and let `n : ℕ+` be a positive integer. If `μₙ` is the
group of `n`th roots of unity in `L` then any field automorphism `g` of `L`
induces an automorphism of `μₙ` which, being a cyclic group, must be of
the form `ζ ↦ ζ^j` for some integer `j = j(g)`, well-defined in `ZMod d`, with
`d` the cardinality of `μₙ`. The function `j` is a group homomorphism
`(L ≃+* L) →* ZMod d`.
Future work: If `L` is separably closed (e.g. algebraically closed) and `p` is a prime
number such that `p ≠ 0` in `L`, then applying the above construction with
`n = p^i` (noting that the size of `μₙ` is `p^i`) gives a compatible collection of
group homomorphisms `(L ≃+* L) →* ZMod (p^i)` which glue to give
a group homomorphism `(L ≃+* L) →* ℤₚ`; this is the `p`-adic cyclotomic character.
## Important definitions
Let `L` be an integral domain, `g : L ≃+* L` and `n : ℕ+`. Let `d` be the number of `n`th roots
of `1` in `L`.
* `ModularCyclotomicCharacter L n hn : (L ≃+* L) →* (ZMod n)ˣ` sends `g` to the unique `j` such
that `g(ζ)=ζ^j` for all `ζ : rootsOfUnity n L`. Here `hn` is a proof that there
are `n` `n`th roots of unity in `L`.
## Implementation note
In theory this could be set up as some theory about monoids, being a character
on monoid isomorphisms, but under the hypotheses that the `n`'th roots of unity
are cyclic. The advantage of sticking to integral domains is that finite subgroups
are guaranteed to be cyclic, so the weaker assumption that there are `n` `n`th
roots of unity is enough. All the applications I'm aware of are when `L` is a
field anyway.
Although I don't know whether it's of any use, `ModularCyclotomicCharacter'`
is the general case for integral domains, with target in `(ZMod d)ˣ`
where `d` is the number of `n`th roots of unity in `L`.
## Todo
* Prove the compatibility of `ModularCyclotomicCharacter n` and `ModularCyclotomicCharacter m`
if `n ∣ m`.
* Define the cyclotomic character.
* Prove that it's continuous.
## Tags
cyclotomic character
-/
universe u
variable {L : Type u} [CommRing L] [IsDomain L]
/-
## The mod n theory
-/
variable (n : ℕ+)
theorem rootsOfUnity.integer_power_of_ringEquiv (g : L ≃+* L) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ t : rootsOfUnity n L, g (t : Lˣ) = (t ^ m : Lˣ) := by
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := MonoidHom.map_cyclic ((g : L ≃* L).restrictRootsOfUnity n).toMonoidHom
exact ⟨m, fun t ↦ Units.ext_iff.1 <| SetCoe.ext_iff.2 <| hm t⟩
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/CyclotomicCharacter.lean | 77 | 79 | theorem rootsOfUnity.integer_power_of_ringEquiv' (g : L ≃+* L) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ t ∈ rootsOfUnity n L, g (t : Lˣ) = (t ^ m : Lˣ) := by |
simpa using rootsOfUnity.integer_power_of_ringEquiv n g
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.SheafCondition.Sites
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Constructions
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties
#align_import algebraic_geometry.properties from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"88474d1b5af6d37c2ab728b757771bced7f5194c"
/-!
# Basic properties of schemes
We provide some basic properties of schemes
## Main definition
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsIntegral`: A scheme is integral if it is nontrivial and all nontrivial
components of the structure sheaf are integral domains.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsReduced`: A scheme is reduced if all the components of the structure sheaf
are reduced.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve perfomance #12737
universe u
open TopologicalSpace Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits TopCat
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable (X : Scheme)
instance : T0Space X.carrier := by
refine T0Space.of_open_cover fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨U, R, ⟨e⟩⟩ := X.local_affine x
let e' : U.1 ≃ₜ PrimeSpectrum R :=
homeoOfIso ((LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _).mapIso e)
exact ⟨U.1.1, U.2, U.1.2, e'.embedding.t0Space⟩
instance : QuasiSober X.carrier := by
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true })
quasiSober_of_open_cover (Set.range fun x => Set.range <| (X.affineCover.map x).1.base)
· rintro ⟨_, i, rfl⟩; exact (X.affineCover.IsOpen i).base_open.isOpen_range
· rintro ⟨_, i, rfl⟩
exact @OpenEmbedding.quasiSober _ _ _ _ _ (Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _
(X.affineCover.IsOpen i).base_open.toEmbedding).symm.openEmbedding PrimeSpectrum.quasiSober
· rw [Set.top_eq_univ, Set.sUnion_range, Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
intro x; exact ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, X.affineCover.Covers x⟩
/-- A scheme `X` is reduced if all `𝒪ₓ(U)` are reduced. -/
class IsReduced : Prop where
component_reduced : ∀ U, IsReduced (X.presheaf.obj (op U)) := by infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.is_reduced AlgebraicGeometry.IsReduced
attribute [instance] IsReduced.component_reduced
theorem isReducedOfStalkIsReduced [∀ x : X.carrier, _root_.IsReduced (X.presheaf.stalk x)] :
IsReduced X := by
refine ⟨fun U => ⟨fun s hs => ?_⟩⟩
apply Presheaf.section_ext X.sheaf U s 0
intro x
rw [RingHom.map_zero]
change X.presheaf.germ x s = 0
exact (hs.map _).eq_zero
#align algebraic_geometry.is_reduced_of_stalk_is_reduced AlgebraicGeometry.isReducedOfStalkIsReduced
instance stalk_isReduced_of_reduced [IsReduced X] (x : X.carrier) :
_root_.IsReduced (X.presheaf.stalk x) := by
constructor
rintro g ⟨n, e⟩
obtain ⟨U, hxU, s, rfl⟩ := X.presheaf.germ_exist x g
rw [← map_pow, ← map_zero (X.presheaf.germ ⟨x, hxU⟩)] at e
obtain ⟨V, hxV, iU, iV, e'⟩ := X.presheaf.germ_eq x hxU hxU _ 0 e
rw [map_pow, map_zero] at e'
replace e' := (IsNilpotent.mk _ _ e').eq_zero (R := X.presheaf.obj <| op V)
erw [← ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (X.presheaf.germ_res iU ⟨x, hxV⟩) s]
rw [comp_apply, e', map_zero]
#align algebraic_geometry.stalk_is_reduced_of_reduced AlgebraicGeometry.stalk_isReduced_of_reduced
theorem isReducedOfOpenImmersion {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
[IsReduced Y] : IsReduced X := by
constructor
intro U
have : U = (Opens.map f.1.base).obj (H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) := by
ext1; exact (Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj).symm
rw [this]
exact isReduced_of_injective (inv <| f.1.c.app (op <| H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U))
(asIso <| f.1.c.app (op <| H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) :
Y.presheaf.obj _ ≅ _).symm.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.injective
#align algebraic_geometry.is_reduced_of_open_immersion AlgebraicGeometry.isReducedOfOpenImmersion
instance {R : CommRingCat.{u}} [H : _root_.IsReduced R] : IsReduced (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R) := by
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) isReducedOfStalkIsReduced
intro x; dsimp
have : _root_.IsReduced (CommRingCat.of <| Localization.AtPrime (PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal x)) := by
dsimp; infer_instance
rw [show (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R).presheaf = (Spec.structureSheaf R).presheaf from rfl]
exact isReduced_of_injective (StructureSheaf.stalkIso R x).hom
(StructureSheaf.stalkIso R x).commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.injective
theorem affine_isReduced_iff (R : CommRingCat) :
IsReduced (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R) ↔ _root_.IsReduced R := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => inferInstance⟩
intro h
have : _root_.IsReduced
(LocallyRingedSpace.Γ.obj (op <| Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.obj <| op R)) := by
change _root_.IsReduced ((Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R).presheaf.obj <| op ⊤); infer_instance
exact isReduced_of_injective (toSpecΓ R) (asIso <| toSpecΓ R).commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.injective
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_is_reduced_iff AlgebraicGeometry.affine_isReduced_iff
theorem isReducedOfIsAffineIsReduced [IsAffine X] [h : _root_.IsReduced (X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤))] :
IsReduced X :=
haveI : IsReduced (Scheme.Spec.obj (op (Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)))) := by
rw [affine_isReduced_iff]; exact h
isReducedOfOpenImmersion X.isoSpec.hom
#align algebraic_geometry.is_reduced_of_is_affine_is_reduced AlgebraicGeometry.isReducedOfIsAffineIsReduced
/-- To show that a statement `P` holds for all open subsets of all schemes, it suffices to show that
1. In any scheme `X`, if `P` holds for an open cover of `U`, then `P` holds for `U`.
2. For an open immerison `f : X ⟶ Y`, if `P` holds for the entire space of `X`, then `P` holds for
the image of `f`.
3. `P` holds for the entire space of an affine scheme.
-/
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Properties.lean | 128 | 146 | theorem reduce_to_affine_global (P : ∀ (X : Scheme) (_ : Opens X.carrier), Prop)
(h₁ : ∀ (X : Scheme) (U : Opens X.carrier),
(∀ x : U, ∃ (V : _) (_ : x.1 ∈ V) (_ : V ⟶ U), P X V) → P X U)
(h₂ : ∀ {X Y} (f : X ⟶ Y) [hf : IsOpenImmersion f],
∃ (U : Set X.carrier) (V : Set Y.carrier) (hU : U = ⊤) (hV : V = Set.range f.1.base),
P X ⟨U, hU.symm ▸ isOpen_univ⟩ → P Y ⟨V, hV.symm ▸ hf.base_open.isOpen_range⟩)
(h₃ : ∀ R : CommRingCat, P (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R) ⊤) :
∀ (X : Scheme) (U : Opens X.carrier), P X U := by |
intro X U
apply h₁
intro x
obtain ⟨_, ⟨j, rfl⟩, hx, i⟩ :=
X.affineBasisCover_is_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open (SetLike.mem_coe.2 x.prop) U.isOpen
let U' : Opens _ := ⟨_, (X.affineBasisCover.IsOpen j).base_open.isOpen_range⟩
let i' : U' ⟶ U := homOfLE i
refine ⟨U', hx, i', ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl, h₂'⟩ := h₂ (X.affineBasisCover.map j)
apply h₂'
apply h₃
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Ashvni Narayanan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ashvni Narayanan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subsemiring.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.subring.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b915e9392ecb2a861e1e766f0e1df6ac481188ca"
/-!
# Subrings
Let `R` be a ring. This file defines the "bundled" subring type `Subring R`, a type
whose terms correspond to subrings of `R`. This is the preferred way to talk
about subrings in mathlib. Unbundled subrings (`s : Set R` and `IsSubring s`)
are not in this file, and they will ultimately be deprecated.
We prove that subrings are a complete lattice, and that you can `map` (pushforward) and
`comap` (pull back) them along ring homomorphisms.
We define the `closure` construction from `Set R` to `Subring R`, sending a subset of `R`
to the subring it generates, and prove that it is a Galois insertion.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
`(R : Type u) [Ring R] (S : Type u) [Ring S] (f g : R →+* S)`
`(A : Subring R) (B : Subring S) (s : Set R)`
* `Subring R` : the type of subrings of a ring `R`.
* `instance : CompleteLattice (Subring R)` : the complete lattice structure on the subrings.
* `Subring.center` : the center of a ring `R`.
* `Subring.closure` : subring closure of a set, i.e., the smallest subring that includes the set.
* `Subring.gi` : `closure : Set M → Subring M` and coercion `(↑) : Subring M → et M`
form a `GaloisInsertion`.
* `comap f B : Subring A` : the preimage of a subring `B` along the ring homomorphism `f`
* `map f A : Subring B` : the image of a subring `A` along the ring homomorphism `f`.
* `prod A B : Subring (R × S)` : the product of subrings
* `f.range : Subring B` : the range of the ring homomorphism `f`.
* `eqLocus f g : Subring R` : given ring homomorphisms `f g : R →+* S`,
the subring of `R` where `f x = g x`
## Implementation notes
A subring is implemented as a subsemiring which is also an additive subgroup.
The initial PR was as a submonoid which is also an additive subgroup.
Lattice inclusion (e.g. `≤` and `⊓`) is used rather than set notation (`⊆` and `∩`), although
`∈` is defined as membership of a subring's underlying set.
## Tags
subring, subrings
-/
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} [Ring R]
section SubringClass
/-- `SubringClass S R` states that `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ R` that
are both a multiplicative submonoid and an additive subgroup. -/
class SubringClass (S : Type*) (R : Type u) [Ring R] [SetLike S R] extends
SubsemiringClass S R, NegMemClass S R : Prop
#align subring_class SubringClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SubringClass.addSubgroupClass (S : Type*) (R : Type u)
[SetLike S R] [Ring R] [h : SubringClass S R] : AddSubgroupClass S R :=
{ h with }
#align subring_class.add_subgroup_class SubringClass.addSubgroupClass
variable [SetLike S R] [hSR : SubringClass S R] (s : S)
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem intCast_mem (n : ℤ) : (n : R) ∈ s := by simp only [← zsmul_one, zsmul_mem, one_mem]
#align coe_int_mem intCast_mem
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated _root_.intCast_mem] alias coe_int_mem := intCast_mem
namespace SubringClass
instance (priority := 75) toHasIntCast : IntCast s :=
⟨fun n => ⟨n, intCast_mem s n⟩⟩
#align subring_class.to_has_int_cast SubringClass.toHasIntCast
-- Prefer subclasses of `Ring` over subclasses of `SubringClass`.
/-- A subring of a ring inherits a ring structure -/
instance (priority := 75) toRing : Ring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.ring (↑) rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align subring_class.to_ring SubringClass.toRing
-- Prefer subclasses of `Ring` over subclasses of `SubringClass`.
/-- A subring of a `CommRing` is a `CommRing`. -/
instance (priority := 75) toCommRing {R} [CommRing R] [SetLike S R] [SubringClass S R] :
CommRing s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commRing (↑) rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align subring_class.to_comm_ring SubringClass.toCommRing
-- Prefer subclasses of `Ring` over subclasses of `SubringClass`.
/-- A subring of a domain is a domain. -/
instance (priority := 75) {R} [Ring R] [IsDomain R] [SetLike S R] [SubringClass S R] : IsDomain s :=
NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
/-- The natural ring hom from a subring of ring `R` to `R`. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →+* R :=
{ SubmonoidClass.subtype s, AddSubgroupClass.subtype s with
toFun := (↑) }
#align subring_class.subtype SubringClass.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coeSubtype : (subtype s : s → R) = ((↑) : s → R) :=
rfl
#align subring_class.coe_subtype SubringClass.coeSubtype
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : s) : R) = n :=
map_natCast (subtype s) n
#align subring_class.coe_nat_cast SubringClass.coe_natCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : s) : R) = n :=
map_intCast (subtype s) n
#align subring_class.coe_int_cast SubringClass.coe_intCast
end SubringClass
end SubringClass
variable [Ring S] [Ring T]
/-- `Subring R` is the type of subrings of `R`. A subring of `R` is a subset `s` that is a
multiplicative submonoid and an additive subgroup. Note in particular that it shares the
same 0 and 1 as R. -/
structure Subring (R : Type u) [Ring R] extends Subsemiring R, AddSubgroup R
#align subring Subring
/-- Reinterpret a `Subring` as a `Subsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc Subring.toSubsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `Subring` as an `AddSubgroup`. -/
add_decl_doc Subring.toAddSubgroup
namespace Subring
-- Porting note: there is no `Subring.toSubmonoid` but we can't define it because there is a
-- projection `s.toSubmonoid`
#noalign subring.to_submonoid
instance : SetLike (Subring R) R where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.ext' h
instance : SubringClass (Subring R) R where
zero_mem s := s.zero_mem'
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
one_mem s := s.one_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
neg_mem {s} := s.neg_mem'
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubsemiring {s : Subring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toSubsemiring ↔ x ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_carrier Subring.mem_carrier
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {S : Subsemiring R} {x : R} (h) : x ∈ (⟨S, h⟩ : Subring R) ↔ x ∈ S := Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_mk Subring.mem_mkₓ
@[simp] theorem coe_set_mk (S : Subsemiring R) (h) : ((⟨S, h⟩ : Subring R) : Set R) = S := rfl
#align subring.coe_set_mk Subring.coe_set_mkₓ
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk {S S' : Subsemiring R} (h₁ h₂) :
(⟨S, h₁⟩ : Subring R) ≤ (⟨S', h₂⟩ : Subring R) ↔ S ≤ S' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subring.mk_le_mk Subring.mk_le_mkₓ
/-- Two subrings are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : Subring R} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subring.ext Subring.ext
/-- Copy of a subring with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : Subring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : Subring R :=
{ S.toSubsemiring.copy s hs with
carrier := s
neg_mem' := hs.symm ▸ S.neg_mem' }
#align subring.copy Subring.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : Subring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_copy Subring.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (S : Subring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subring.copy_eq Subring.copy_eq
theorem toSubsemiring_injective : Function.Injective (toSubsemiring : Subring R → Subsemiring R)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align subring.to_subsemiring_injective Subring.toSubsemiring_injective
@[mono]
theorem toSubsemiring_strictMono : StrictMono (toSubsemiring : Subring R → Subsemiring R) :=
fun _ _ => id
#align subring.to_subsemiring_strict_mono Subring.toSubsemiring_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toSubsemiring_mono : Monotone (toSubsemiring : Subring R → Subsemiring R) :=
toSubsemiring_strictMono.monotone
#align subring.to_subsemiring_mono Subring.toSubsemiring_mono
theorem toAddSubgroup_injective : Function.Injective (toAddSubgroup : Subring R → AddSubgroup R)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align subring.to_add_subgroup_injective Subring.toAddSubgroup_injective
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubgroup_strictMono : StrictMono (toAddSubgroup : Subring R → AddSubgroup R) :=
fun _ _ => id
#align subring.to_add_subgroup_strict_mono Subring.toAddSubgroup_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubgroup_mono : Monotone (toAddSubgroup : Subring R → AddSubgroup R) :=
toAddSubgroup_strictMono.monotone
#align subring.to_add_subgroup_mono Subring.toAddSubgroup_mono
theorem toSubmonoid_injective : Function.Injective (fun s : Subring R => s.toSubmonoid)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align subring.to_submonoid_injective Subring.toSubmonoid_injective
@[mono]
theorem toSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (fun s : Subring R => s.toSubmonoid) := fun _ _ => id
#align subring.to_submonoid_strict_mono Subring.toSubmonoid_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (fun s : Subring R => s.toSubmonoid) :=
toSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subring.to_submonoid_mono Subring.toSubmonoid_mono
/-- Construct a `Subring R` from a set `s`, a submonoid `sm`, and an additive
subgroup `sa` such that `x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ sm ↔ x ∈ sa`. -/
protected def mk' (s : Set R) (sm : Submonoid R) (sa : AddSubgroup R) (hm : ↑sm = s)
(ha : ↑sa = s) : Subring R :=
{ sm.copy s hm.symm, sa.copy s ha.symm with }
#align subring.mk' Subring.mk'
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubgroup R} (ha : ↑sa = s) :
(Subring.mk' s sm sa hm ha : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_mk' Subring.coe_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk' {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubgroup R} (ha : ↑sa = s)
{x : R} : x ∈ Subring.mk' s sm sa hm ha ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_mk' Subring.mem_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_toSubmonoid {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubgroup R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (Subring.mk' s sm sa hm ha).toSubmonoid = sm :=
SetLike.coe_injective hm.symm
#align subring.mk'_to_submonoid Subring.mk'_toSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem mk'_toAddSubgroup {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubgroup R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (Subring.mk' s sm sa hm ha).toAddSubgroup = sa :=
SetLike.coe_injective ha.symm
#align subring.mk'_to_add_subgroup Subring.mk'_toAddSubgroup
end Subring
/-- A `Subsemiring` containing -1 is a `Subring`. -/
def Subsemiring.toSubring (s : Subsemiring R) (hneg : (-1 : R) ∈ s) : Subring R where
toSubsemiring := s
neg_mem' h := by
rw [← neg_one_mul]
exact mul_mem hneg h
#align subsemiring.to_subring Subsemiring.toSubring
namespace Subring
variable (s : Subring R)
/-- A subring contains the ring's 1. -/
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : R) ∈ s :=
one_mem _
#align subring.one_mem Subring.one_mem
/-- A subring contains the ring's 0. -/
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : R) ∈ s :=
zero_mem _
#align subring.zero_mem Subring.zero_mem
/-- A subring is closed under multiplication. -/
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : R} : x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s :=
mul_mem
#align subring.mul_mem Subring.mul_mem
/-- A subring is closed under addition. -/
protected theorem add_mem {x y : R} : x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s :=
add_mem
#align subring.add_mem Subring.add_mem
/-- A subring is closed under negation. -/
protected theorem neg_mem {x : R} : x ∈ s → -x ∈ s :=
neg_mem
#align subring.neg_mem Subring.neg_mem
/-- A subring is closed under subtraction -/
protected theorem sub_mem {x y : R} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x - y ∈ s :=
sub_mem hx hy
#align subring.sub_mem Subring.sub_mem
/-- Product of a list of elements in a subring is in the subring. -/
protected theorem list_prod_mem {l : List R} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s) → l.prod ∈ s :=
list_prod_mem
#align subring.list_prod_mem Subring.list_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a list of elements in a subring is in the subring. -/
protected theorem list_sum_mem {l : List R} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s) → l.sum ∈ s :=
list_sum_mem
#align subring.list_sum_mem Subring.list_sum_mem
/-- Product of a multiset of elements in a subring of a `CommRing` is in the subring. -/
protected theorem multiset_prod_mem {R} [CommRing R] (s : Subring R) (m : Multiset R) :
(∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s) → m.prod ∈ s :=
multiset_prod_mem _
#align subring.multiset_prod_mem Subring.multiset_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a multiset of elements in a `Subring` of a `Ring` is
in the `Subring`. -/
protected theorem multiset_sum_mem {R} [Ring R] (s : Subring R) (m : Multiset R) :
(∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s) → m.sum ∈ s :=
multiset_sum_mem _
#align subring.multiset_sum_mem Subring.multiset_sum_mem
/-- Product of elements of a subring of a `CommRing` indexed by a `Finset` is in the
subring. -/
protected theorem prod_mem {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (s : Subring R) {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι}
{f : ι → R} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ s) : (∏ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ s :=
prod_mem h
#align subring.prod_mem Subring.prod_mem
/-- Sum of elements in a `Subring` of a `Ring` indexed by a `Finset`
is in the `Subring`. -/
protected theorem sum_mem {R : Type*} [Ring R] (s : Subring R) {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι}
{f : ι → R} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ s) : (∑ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ s :=
sum_mem h
#align subring.sum_mem Subring.sum_mem
/-- A subring of a ring inherits a ring structure -/
instance toRing : Ring s := SubringClass.toRing s
#align subring.to_ring Subring.toRing
protected theorem zsmul_mem {x : R} (hx : x ∈ s) (n : ℤ) : n • x ∈ s :=
zsmul_mem hx n
#align subring.zsmul_mem Subring.zsmul_mem
protected theorem pow_mem {x : R} (hx : x ∈ s) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ s :=
pow_mem hx n
#align subring.pow_mem Subring.pow_mem
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : s) : (↑(x + y) : R) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_add Subring.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (x : s) : (↑(-x) : R) = -↑x :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_neg Subring.coe_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : s) : (↑(x * y) : R) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_mul Subring.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : s) : R) = 0 :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_zero Subring.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : s) : R) = 1 :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_one Subring.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : s) (n : ℕ) : ↑(x ^ n) = (x : R) ^ n :=
SubmonoidClass.coe_pow x n
#align subring.coe_pow Subring.coe_pow
-- TODO: can be generalized to `AddSubmonoidClass`
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : s} : (x : R) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Subtype.ext (Trans.trans h s.coe_zero.symm), fun h => h.symm ▸ s.coe_zero⟩
#align subring.coe_eq_zero_iff Subring.coe_eq_zero_iff
/-- A subring of a `CommRing` is a `CommRing`. -/
instance toCommRing {R} [CommRing R] (s : Subring R) : CommRing s :=
SubringClass.toCommRing s
#align subring.to_comm_ring Subring.toCommRing
/-- A subring of a non-trivial ring is non-trivial. -/
instance {R} [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] (s : Subring R) : Nontrivial s :=
s.toSubsemiring.nontrivial
/-- A subring of a ring with no zero divisors has no zero divisors. -/
instance {R} [Ring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] (s : Subring R) : NoZeroDivisors s :=
s.toSubsemiring.noZeroDivisors
/-- A subring of a domain is a domain. -/
instance {R} [Ring R] [IsDomain R] (s : Subring R) : IsDomain s :=
NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
/-- The natural ring hom from a subring of ring `R` to `R`. -/
def subtype (s : Subring R) : s →+* R :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.subtype, s.toAddSubgroup.subtype with toFun := (↑) }
#align subring.subtype Subring.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coeSubtype : ⇑s.subtype = ((↑) : s → R) :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_subtype Subring.coeSubtype
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this (removed `@[simp]`)
theorem coe_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : s) : R) = n :=
map_natCast s.subtype
#align subring.coe_nat_cast Subring.coe_natCast
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this (removed `@[simp]`)
theorem coe_intCast : ∀ n : ℤ, ((n : s) : R) = n :=
map_intCast s.subtype
#align subring.coe_int_cast Subring.coe_intCast
/-! ## Partial order -/
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubsemiring (s : Subring R) : (s.toSubsemiring : Set R) = s :=
rfl
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem mem_toSubmonoid {s : Subring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_to_submonoid Subring.mem_toSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmonoid (s : Subring R) : (s.toSubmonoid : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_to_submonoid Subring.coe_toSubmonoid
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem mem_toAddSubgroup {s : Subring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toAddSubgroup ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_to_add_subgroup Subring.mem_toAddSubgroup
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAddSubgroup (s : Subring R) : (s.toAddSubgroup : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_to_add_subgroup Subring.coe_toAddSubgroup
/-! ## top -/
/-- The subring `R` of the ring `R`. -/
instance : Top (Subring R) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submonoid R), (⊤ : AddSubgroup R) with }⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : R) : x ∈ (⊤ : Subring R) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align subring.mem_top Subring.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Subring R) : Set R) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_top Subring.coe_top
/-- The ring equiv between the top element of `Subring R` and `R`. -/
@[simps!]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subring R) ≃+* R :=
Subsemiring.topEquiv
#align subring.top_equiv Subring.topEquiv
theorem card_top (R) [Ring R] [Fintype R] : Fintype.card (⊤ : Subring R) = Fintype.card R :=
Fintype.card_congr topEquiv.toEquiv
/-! ## comap -/
/-- The preimage of a subring along a ring homomorphism is a subring. -/
def comap {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (s : Subring S) : Subring R :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.comap (f : R →* S), s.toAddSubgroup.comap (f : R →+ S) with
carrier := f ⁻¹' s.carrier }
#align subring.comap Subring.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (s : Subring S) (f : R →+* S) : (s.comap f : Set R) = f ⁻¹' s :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_comap Subring.coe_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {s : Subring S} {f : R →+* S} {x : R} : x ∈ s.comap f ↔ f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_comap Subring.mem_comap
theorem comap_comap (s : Subring T) (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S) :
(s.comap g).comap f = s.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align subring.comap_comap Subring.comap_comap
/-! ## map -/
/-- The image of a subring along a ring homomorphism is a subring. -/
def map {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (s : Subring R) : Subring S :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.map (f : R →* S), s.toAddSubgroup.map (f : R →+ S) with
carrier := f '' s.carrier }
#align subring.map Subring.map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : R →+* S) (s : Subring R) : (s.map f : Set S) = f '' s :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_map Subring.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : R →+* S} {s : Subring R} {y : S} : y ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, f x = y := Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_map Subring.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : s.map (RingHom.id R) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
#align subring.map_id Subring.map_id
theorem map_map (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
#align subring.map_map Subring.map_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : R →+* S} {s : Subring R} {t : Subring S} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
Set.image_subset_iff
#align subring.map_le_iff_le_comap Subring.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (f : R →+* S) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align subring.gc_map_comap Subring.gc_map_comap
/-- A subring is isomorphic to its image under an injective function -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) : s ≃+* s.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f s hf with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (f.map_mul _ _)
map_add' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (f.map_add _ _) }
#align subring.equiv_map_of_injective Subring.equivMapOfInjective
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : s) :
(equivMapOfInjective s f hf x : S) = f x :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply Subring.coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply
end Subring
namespace RingHom
variable (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S)
/-! ## range -/
/-- The range of a ring homomorphism, as a subring of the target. See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) : Subring S :=
((⊤ : Subring R).map f).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
#align ring_hom.range RingHom.range
@[simp]
theorem coe_range : (f.range : Set S) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.coe_range RingHom.coe_range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {f : R →+* S} {y : S} : y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align ring_hom.mem_range RingHom.mem_range
theorem range_eq_map (f : R →+* S) : f.range = Subring.map f ⊤ := by
ext
simp
#align ring_hom.range_eq_map RingHom.range_eq_map
theorem mem_range_self (f : R →+* S) (x : R) : f x ∈ f.range :=
mem_range.mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align ring_hom.mem_range_self RingHom.mem_range_self
theorem map_range : f.range.map g = (g.comp f).range := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using (⊤ : Subring R).map_map g f
#align ring_hom.map_range RingHom.map_range
/-- The range of a ring homomorphism is a fintype, if the domain is a fintype.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` in the
presence of `Fintype S`. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype R] [DecidableEq S] (f : R →+* S) : Fintype (range f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
#align ring_hom.fintype_range RingHom.fintypeRange
end RingHom
namespace Subring
/-! ## bot -/
instance : Bot (Subring R) :=
⟨(Int.castRingHom R).range⟩
instance : Inhabited (Subring R) :=
⟨⊥⟩
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Subring R) : Set R) = Set.range ((↑) : ℤ → R) :=
RingHom.coe_range (Int.castRingHom R)
#align subring.coe_bot Subring.coe_bot
theorem mem_bot {x : R} : x ∈ (⊥ : Subring R) ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, ↑n = x :=
RingHom.mem_range
#align subring.mem_bot Subring.mem_bot
/-! ## inf -/
/-- The inf of two subrings is their intersection. -/
instance : Inf (Subring R) :=
⟨fun s t =>
{ s.toSubmonoid ⊓ t.toSubmonoid, s.toAddSubgroup ⊓ t.toAddSubgroup with carrier := s ∩ t }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : Subring R) : ((p ⊓ p' : Subring R) : Set R) = (p : Set R) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_inf Subring.coe_inf
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : Subring R} {x : R} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_inf Subring.mem_inf
instance : InfSet (Subring R) :=
⟨fun s =>
Subring.mk' (⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t) (⨅ t ∈ s, t.toSubmonoid) (⨅ t ∈ s, Subring.toAddSubgroup t)
(by simp) (by simp)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (Subring R)) : ((sInf S : Subring R) : Set R) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_Inf Subring.coe_sInf
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subring R)} {x : R} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align subring.mem_Inf Subring.mem_sInf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subring R} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set R) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
#align subring.coe_infi Subring.coe_iInf
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subring R} {x : R} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align subring.mem_infi Subring.mem_iInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubmonoid (s : Set (Subring R)) :
(sInf s).toSubmonoid = ⨅ t ∈ s, t.toSubmonoid :=
mk'_toSubmonoid _ _
#align subring.Inf_to_submonoid Subring.sInf_toSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toAddSubgroup (s : Set (Subring R)) :
(sInf s).toAddSubgroup = ⨅ t ∈ s, Subring.toAddSubgroup t :=
mk'_toAddSubgroup _ _
#align subring.Inf_to_add_subgroup Subring.sInf_toAddSubgroup
/-- Subrings of a ring form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (Subring R) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subring R) fun _ =>
IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun s _x hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := mem_bot.1 hx
hn ▸ intCast_mem s n
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _s _x _hx => trivial
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _s _t _x => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _s _t _x => And.right
le_inf := fun _s _t₁ _t₂ h₁ h₂ _x hx => ⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩ }
theorem eq_top_iff' (A : Subring R) : A = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : R, x ∈ A :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
#align subring.eq_top_iff' Subring.eq_top_iff'
/-! ## Center of a ring -/
section
variable (R)
/-- The center of a ring `R` is the set of elements that commute with everything in `R` -/
def center : Subring R :=
{ Subsemiring.center R with
carrier := Set.center R
neg_mem' := Set.neg_mem_center }
#align subring.center Subring.center
theorem coe_center : ↑(center R) = Set.center R :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_center Subring.coe_center
@[simp]
theorem center_toSubsemiring : (center R).toSubsemiring = Subsemiring.center R :=
rfl
#align subring.center_to_subsemiring Subring.center_toSubsemiring
variable {R}
theorem mem_center_iff {z : R} : z ∈ center R ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g :=
Subsemigroup.mem_center_iff
#align subring.mem_center_iff Subring.mem_center_iff
instance decidableMemCenter [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] : DecidablePred (· ∈ center R) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ mem_center_iff
#align subring.decidable_mem_center Subring.decidableMemCenter
@[simp]
theorem center_eq_top (R) [CommRing R] : center R = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.center_eq_univ R)
#align subring.center_eq_top Subring.center_eq_top
/-- The center is commutative. -/
instance : CommRing (center R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring (Subsemiring.center R)), (center R).toRing with }
end
section DivisionRing
variable {K : Type u} [DivisionRing K]
instance instField : Field (center K) where
inv a := ⟨a⁻¹, Set.inv_mem_center₀ a.prop⟩
mul_inv_cancel a ha := Subtype.ext <| mul_inv_cancel <| Subtype.coe_injective.ne ha
div a b := ⟨a / b, Set.div_mem_center₀ a.prop b.prop⟩
div_eq_mul_inv a b := Subtype.ext <| div_eq_mul_inv _ _
inv_zero := Subtype.ext inv_zero
-- TODO: use a nicer defeq
nnqsmul := _
qsmul := _
@[simp]
theorem center.coe_inv (a : center K) : ((a⁻¹ : center K) : K) = (a : K)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align subring.center.coe_inv Subring.center.coe_inv
@[simp]
theorem center.coe_div (a b : center K) : ((a / b : center K) : K) = (a : K) / (b : K) :=
rfl
#align subring.center.coe_div Subring.center.coe_div
end DivisionRing
section Centralizer
/-- The centralizer of a set inside a ring as a `Subring`. -/
def centralizer (s : Set R) : Subring R :=
{ Subsemiring.centralizer s with neg_mem' := Set.neg_mem_centralizer }
#align subring.centralizer Subring.centralizer
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_centralizer (s : Set R) : (centralizer s : Set R) = s.centralizer :=
rfl
#align subring.coe_centralizer Subring.coe_centralizer
theorem centralizer_toSubmonoid (s : Set R) :
(centralizer s).toSubmonoid = Submonoid.centralizer s :=
rfl
#align subring.centralizer_to_submonoid Subring.centralizer_toSubmonoid
theorem centralizer_toSubsemiring (s : Set R) :
(centralizer s).toSubsemiring = Subsemiring.centralizer s :=
rfl
#align subring.centralizer_to_subsemiring Subring.centralizer_toSubsemiring
theorem mem_centralizer_iff {s : Set R} {z : R} : z ∈ centralizer s ↔ ∀ g ∈ s, g * z = z * g :=
Iff.rfl
#align subring.mem_centralizer_iff Subring.mem_centralizer_iff
theorem center_le_centralizer (s) : center R ≤ centralizer s :=
s.center_subset_centralizer
#align subring.center_le_centralizer Subring.center_le_centralizer
theorem centralizer_le (s t : Set R) (h : s ⊆ t) : centralizer t ≤ centralizer s :=
Set.centralizer_subset h
#align subring.centralizer_le Subring.centralizer_le
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset {s : Set R} : centralizer s = ⊤ ↔ s ⊆ center R :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans Set.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
#align subring.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset Subring.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_univ : centralizer Set.univ = center R :=
SetLike.ext' (Set.centralizer_univ R)
#align subring.centralizer_univ Subring.centralizer_univ
end Centralizer
/-! ## subring closure of a subset -/
/-- The `Subring` generated by a set. -/
def closure (s : Set R) : Subring R :=
sInf { S | s ⊆ S }
#align subring.closure Subring.closure
theorem mem_closure {x : R} {s : Set R} : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ S : Subring R, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
#align subring.mem_closure Subring.mem_closure
/-- The subring generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_closure {s : Set R} : s ⊆ closure s := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hS => hS hx
#align subring.subset_closure Subring.subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {s : Set R} {P : R} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align subring.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure Subring.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
/-- A subring `t` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_le {s : Set R} {t : Subring R} : closure s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Set.Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
#align subring.closure_le Subring.closure_le
/-- Subring closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure s ≤ closure t`. -/
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set R⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ≤ closure t :=
closure_le.2 <| Set.Subset.trans h subset_closure
#align subring.closure_mono Subring.closure_mono
theorem closure_eq_of_le {s : Set R} {t : Subring R} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ≤ closure s) :
closure s = t :=
le_antisymm (closure_le.2 h₁) h₂
#align subring.closure_eq_of_le Subring.closure_eq_of_le
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `0`, `1`, and all elements
of `s`, and is preserved under addition, negation, and multiplication, then `p` holds for all
elements of the closure of `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {s : Set R} {p : R → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure s) (Hs : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(zero : p 0) (one : p 1) (add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) (neg : ∀ x : R, p x → p (-x))
(mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨⟨p, @mul⟩, one⟩, @add, zero⟩, @neg⟩).2 Hs h
#align subring.closure_induction Subring.closure_induction
@[elab_as_elim]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Subring/Basic.lean | 885 | 899 | theorem closure_induction' {s : Set R} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_closure h))
(zero : p 0 (zero_mem _)) (one : p 1 (one_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy))
(neg : ∀ x hx, p x hx → p (-x) (neg_mem hx))
(mul : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
{a : R} (ha : a ∈ closure s) : p a ha := by |
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (ha : a ∈ closure s) (hc : p a ha) => hc
refine
closure_induction ha (fun m hm => ⟨subset_closure hm, mem m hm⟩) ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
⟨one_mem _, one⟩ ?_ (fun x hx => hx.elim fun hx' hx => ⟨neg_mem hx', neg _ _ hx⟩) ?_
· exact (fun x y hx hy => hx.elim fun hx' hx => hy.elim fun hy' hy =>
⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
· exact (fun x y hx hy => hx.elim fun hx' hx => hy.elim fun hy' hy =>
⟨mul_mem hx' hy', mul _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 98 | 101 | theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by |
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
#align_import category_theory.subobject.factor_thru from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"829895f162a1f29d0133f4b3538f4cd1fb5bffd3"
/-!
# Factoring through subobjects
The predicate `h : P.Factors f`, for `P : Subobject Y` and `f : X ⟶ Y`
asserts the existence of some `P.factorThru f : X ⟶ (P : C)` making the obvious diagram commute.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {X Y Z : C}
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace MonoOver
/-- When `f : X ⟶ Y` and `P : MonoOver Y`,
`P.Factors f` expresses that there exists a factorisation of `f` through `P`.
Given `h : P.Factors f`, you can recover the morphism as `P.factorThru f h`.
-/
def Factors {X Y : C} (P : MonoOver Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
∃ g : X ⟶ (P : C), g ≫ P.arrow = f
#align category_theory.mono_over.factors CategoryTheory.MonoOver.Factors
theorem factors_congr {X : C} {f g : MonoOver X} {Y : C} (h : Y ⟶ X) (e : f ≅ g) :
f.Factors h ↔ g.Factors h :=
⟨fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨u ≫ ((MonoOver.forget _).map e.hom).left, by simp [hu]⟩, fun ⟨u, hu⟩ =>
⟨u ≫ ((MonoOver.forget _).map e.inv).left, by simp [hu]⟩⟩
#align category_theory.mono_over.factors_congr CategoryTheory.MonoOver.factors_congr
/-- `P.factorThru f h` provides a factorisation of `f : X ⟶ Y` through some `P : MonoOver Y`,
given the evidence `h : P.Factors f` that such a factorisation exists. -/
def factorThru {X Y : C} (P : MonoOver Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Factors P f) : X ⟶ (P : C) :=
Classical.choose h
#align category_theory.mono_over.factor_thru CategoryTheory.MonoOver.factorThru
end MonoOver
namespace Subobject
/-- When `f : X ⟶ Y` and `P : Subobject Y`,
`P.Factors f` expresses that there exists a factorisation of `f` through `P`.
Given `h : P.Factors f`, you can recover the morphism as `P.factorThru f h`.
-/
def Factors {X Y : C} (P : Subobject Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
Quotient.liftOn' P (fun P => P.Factors f)
(by
rintro P Q ⟨h⟩
apply propext
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, w⟩
exact ⟨i ≫ h.hom.left, by erw [Category.assoc, Over.w h.hom, w]⟩
· rintro ⟨i, w⟩
exact ⟨i ≫ h.inv.left, by erw [Category.assoc, Over.w h.inv, w]⟩)
#align category_theory.subobject.factors CategoryTheory.Subobject.Factors
@[simp]
theorem mk_factors_iff {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [Mono f] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
(Subobject.mk f).Factors g ↔ (MonoOver.mk' f).Factors g :=
Iff.rfl
#align category_theory.subobject.mk_factors_iff CategoryTheory.Subobject.mk_factors_iff
theorem mk_factors_self (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : (mk f).Factors f :=
⟨𝟙 _, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.mk_factors_self CategoryTheory.Subobject.mk_factors_self
theorem factors_iff {X Y : C} (P : Subobject Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
P.Factors f ↔ (representative.obj P).Factors f :=
Quot.inductionOn P fun _ => MonoOver.factors_congr _ (representativeIso _).symm
#align category_theory.subobject.factors_iff CategoryTheory.Subobject.factors_iff
theorem factors_self {X : C} (P : Subobject X) : P.Factors P.arrow :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨𝟙 (P : C), by simp⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.factors_self CategoryTheory.Subobject.factors_self
theorem factors_comp_arrow {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} (f : X ⟶ P) : P.Factors (f ≫ P.arrow) :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨f, rfl⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.factors_comp_arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.factors_comp_arrow
theorem factors_of_factors_right {X Y Z : C} {P : Subobject Z} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g : Y ⟶ Z}
(h : P.Factors g) : P.Factors (f ≫ g) := by
induction' P using Quotient.ind' with P
obtain ⟨g, rfl⟩ := h
exact ⟨f ≫ g, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.factors_of_factors_right CategoryTheory.Subobject.factors_of_factors_right
theorem factors_zero [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} : P.Factors (0 : X ⟶ Y) :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.factors_zero CategoryTheory.Subobject.factors_zero
theorem factors_of_le {Y Z : C} {P Q : Subobject Y} (f : Z ⟶ Y) (h : P ≤ Q) :
P.Factors f → Q.Factors f := by
simp only [factors_iff]
exact fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨u ≫ ofLE _ _ h, by simp [← hu]⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.factors_of_le CategoryTheory.Subobject.factors_of_le
/-- `P.factorThru f h` provides a factorisation of `f : X ⟶ Y` through some `P : Subobject Y`,
given the evidence `h : P.Factors f` that such a factorisation exists. -/
def factorThru {X Y : C} (P : Subobject Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Factors P f) : X ⟶ P :=
Classical.choose ((factors_iff _ _).mp h)
#align category_theory.subobject.factor_thru CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem factorThru_arrow {X Y : C} (P : Subobject Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Factors P f) :
P.factorThru f h ≫ P.arrow = f :=
Classical.choose_spec ((factors_iff _ _).mp h)
#align category_theory.subobject.factor_thru_arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru_arrow
@[simp]
theorem factorThru_self {X : C} (P : Subobject X) (h) : P.factorThru P.arrow h = 𝟙 (P : C) := by
ext
simp
#align category_theory.subobject.factor_thru_self CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru_self
@[simp]
theorem factorThru_mk_self (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(mk f).factorThru f (mk_factors_self f) = (underlyingIso f).inv := by
ext
simp
#align category_theory.subobject.factor_thru_mk_self CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru_mk_self
@[simp]
theorem factorThru_comp_arrow {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} (f : X ⟶ P) (h) :
P.factorThru (f ≫ P.arrow) h = f := by
ext
simp
#align category_theory.subobject.factor_thru_comp_arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru_comp_arrow
@[simp]
theorem factorThru_eq_zero [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}
{h : Factors P f} : P.factorThru f h = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
fconstructor
· intro w
replace w := w =≫ P.arrow
simpa using w
· rintro rfl
ext
simp
#align category_theory.subobject.factor_thru_eq_zero CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru_eq_zero
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/FactorThru.lean | 157 | 160 | theorem factorThru_right {X Y Z : C} {P : Subobject Z} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : P.Factors g) :
f ≫ P.factorThru g h = P.factorThru (f ≫ g) (factors_of_factors_right f h) := by |
apply (cancel_mono P.arrow).mp
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Symmetric
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.vieta from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# Vieta's Formula
The main result is `Multiset.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm`, which shows that the product of
linear terms `X + λ` with `λ` in a `Multiset s` is equal to a linear combination of the
symmetric functions `esymm s`.
From this, we deduce `MvPolynomial.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm` which is the equivalent formula
for the product of linear terms `X + X i` with `i` in a `Fintype σ` as a linear combination
of the symmetric polynomials `esymm σ R j`.
For `R` be an integral domain (so that `p.roots` is defined for any `p : R[X]` as a multiset),
we derive `Polynomial.coeff_eq_esymm_roots_of_card`, the relationship between the coefficients and
the roots of `p` for a polynomial `p` that splits (i.e. having as many roots as its degree).
-/
open Polynomial
namespace Multiset
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/-- A sum version of **Vieta's formula** for `Multiset`: the product of the linear terms `X + λ`
where `λ` runs through a multiset `s` is equal to a linear combination of the symmetric functions
`esymm s` of the `λ`'s . -/
theorem prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm (s : Multiset R) :
(s.map fun r => X + C r).prod =
∑ j ∈ Finset.range (Multiset.card s + 1), (C (s.esymm j) * X ^ (Multiset.card s - j)) := by
classical
rw [prod_map_add, antidiagonal_eq_map_powerset, map_map, ← bind_powerset_len,
map_bind, sum_bind, Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, Finset.range_val, map_congr (Eq.refl _)]
intro _ _
rw [esymm, ← sum_hom', ← sum_map_mul_right, map_congr (Eq.refl _)]
intro s ht
rw [mem_powersetCard] at ht
dsimp
rw [prod_hom' s (Polynomial.C : R →+* R[X])]
simp [ht, map_const, prod_replicate, prod_hom', map_id', card_sub]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align multiset.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm Multiset.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm
/-- Vieta's formula for the coefficients of the product of linear terms `X + λ` where `λ` runs
through a multiset `s` : the `k`th coefficient is the symmetric function `esymm (card s - k) s`. -/
theorem prod_X_add_C_coeff (s : Multiset R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ Multiset.card s) :
(s.map fun r => X + C r).prod.coeff k = s.esymm (Multiset.card s - k) := by
convert Polynomial.ext_iff.mp (prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm s) k using 1
simp_rw [finset_sum_coeff, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (Multiset.card s - k) _]
· rw [if_pos (Nat.sub_sub_self h).symm]
· intro j hj1 hj2
suffices k ≠ card s - j by rw [if_neg this]
intro hn
rw [hn, Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (Finset.mem_range.mp hj1))] at hj2
exact Ne.irrefl hj2
· rw [Finset.mem_range]
exact Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.sub_le (Multiset.card s) k)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align multiset.prod_X_add_C_coeff Multiset.prod_X_add_C_coeff
theorem prod_X_add_C_coeff' {σ} (s : Multiset σ) (r : σ → R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ Multiset.card s) :
(s.map fun i => X + C (r i)).prod.coeff k = (s.map r).esymm (Multiset.card s - k) := by
erw [← map_map (fun r => X + C r) r, prod_X_add_C_coeff] <;> rw [s.card_map r]; assumption
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align multiset.prod_X_add_C_coeff' Multiset.prod_X_add_C_coeff'
theorem _root_.Finset.prod_X_add_C_coeff {σ} (s : Finset σ) (r : σ → R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ s.card) :
(∏ i ∈ s, (X + C (r i))).coeff k = ∑ t ∈ s.powersetCard (s.card - k), ∏ i ∈ t, r i := by
rw [Finset.prod, prod_X_add_C_coeff' _ r h, Finset.esymm_map_val]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align finset.prod_X_add_C_coeff Finset.prod_X_add_C_coeff
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
theorem esymm_neg (s : Multiset R) (k : ℕ) : (map Neg.neg s).esymm k = (-1) ^ k * esymm s k := by
rw [esymm, esymm, ← Multiset.sum_map_mul_left, Multiset.powersetCard_map, Multiset.map_map,
map_congr rfl]
intro x hx
rw [(mem_powersetCard.mp hx).right.symm, ← prod_replicate, ← Multiset.map_const]
nth_rw 3 [← map_id' x]
rw [← prod_map_mul, map_congr rfl, Function.comp_apply]
exact fun z _ => neg_one_mul z
#align multiset.esymm_neg Multiset.esymm_neg
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Vieta.lean | 104 | 116 | theorem prod_X_sub_X_eq_sum_esymm (s : Multiset R) :
(s.map fun t => X - C t).prod =
∑ j ∈ Finset.range (Multiset.card s + 1),
(-1) ^ j * (C (s.esymm j) * X ^ (Multiset.card s - j)) := by |
conv_lhs =>
congr
congr
ext x
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [← map_neg C x]
convert prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm (map (fun t => -t) s) using 1
· rw [map_map]; rfl
· simp only [esymm_neg, card_map, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_pow, map_neg, map_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yourong Zang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yourong Zang, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
#align_import topology.alexandroff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
/-!
# The OnePoint Compactification
We construct the OnePoint compactification (the one-point compactification) of an arbitrary
topological space `X` and prove some properties inherited from `X`.
## Main definitions
* `OnePoint`: the OnePoint compactification, we use coercion for the canonical embedding
`X → OnePoint X`; when `X` is already compact, the compactification adds an isolated point
to the space.
* `OnePoint.infty`: the extra point
## Main results
* The topological structure of `OnePoint X`
* The connectedness of `OnePoint X` for a noncompact, preconnected `X`
* `OnePoint X` is `T₀` for a T₀ space `X`
* `OnePoint X` is `T₁` for a T₁ space `X`
* `OnePoint X` is normal if `X` is a locally compact Hausdorff space
## Tags
one-point compactification, compactness
-/
open Set Filter Topology
/-!
### Definition and basic properties
In this section we define `OnePoint X` to be the disjoint union of `X` and `∞`, implemented as
`Option X`. Then we restate some lemmas about `Option X` for `OnePoint X`.
-/
variable {X : Type*}
/-- The OnePoint extension of an arbitrary topological space `X` -/
def OnePoint (X : Type*) :=
Option X
#align alexandroff OnePoint
/-- The repr uses the notation from the `OnePoint` locale. -/
instance [Repr X] : Repr (OnePoint X) :=
⟨fun o _ =>
match o with
| none => "∞"
| some a => "↑" ++ repr a⟩
namespace OnePoint
/-- The point at infinity -/
@[match_pattern] def infty : OnePoint X := none
#align alexandroff.infty OnePoint.infty
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "∞" => OnePoint.infty
/-- Coercion from `X` to `OnePoint X`. -/
@[coe, match_pattern] def some : X → OnePoint X := Option.some
instance : CoeTC X (OnePoint X) := ⟨some⟩
instance : Inhabited (OnePoint X) := ⟨∞⟩
instance [Fintype X] : Fintype (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Fintype (Option X))
instance infinite [Infinite X] : Infinite (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Infinite (Option X))
#align alexandroff.infinite OnePoint.infinite
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
Option.some_injective X
#align alexandroff.coe_injective OnePoint.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {x y : X} : (x : OnePoint X) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
#align alexandroff.coe_eq_coe OnePoint.coe_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_infty (x : X) : (x : OnePoint X) ≠ ∞ :=
nofun
#align alexandroff.coe_ne_infty OnePoint.coe_ne_infty
@[simp]
theorem infty_ne_coe (x : X) : ∞ ≠ (x : OnePoint X) :=
nofun
#align alexandroff.infty_ne_coe OnePoint.infty_ne_coe
/-- Recursor for `OnePoint` using the preferred forms `∞` and `↑x`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def rec {C : OnePoint X → Sort*} (h₁ : C ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x : X, C x) :
∀ z : OnePoint X, C z
| ∞ => h₁
| (x : X) => h₂ x
#align alexandroff.rec OnePoint.rec
theorem isCompl_range_coe_infty : IsCompl (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X)) {∞} :=
isCompl_range_some_none X
#align alexandroff.is_compl_range_coe_infty OnePoint.isCompl_range_coe_infty
-- Porting note: moved @[simp] to a new lemma
theorem range_coe_union_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∪ {∞} = univ :=
range_some_union_none X
#align alexandroff.range_coe_union_infty OnePoint.range_coe_union_infty
@[simp]
theorem insert_infty_range_coe : insert ∞ (range (@some X)) = univ :=
insert_none_range_some _
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_inter_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∩ {∞} = ∅ :=
range_some_inter_none X
#align alexandroff.range_coe_inter_infty OnePoint.range_coe_inter_infty
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_coe : (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X))ᶜ = {∞} :=
compl_range_some X
#align alexandroff.compl_range_coe OnePoint.compl_range_coe
theorem compl_infty : ({∞}ᶜ : Set (OnePoint X)) = range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
(@isCompl_range_coe_infty X).symm.compl_eq
#align alexandroff.compl_infty OnePoint.compl_infty
theorem compl_image_coe (s : Set X) : ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ = (↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} := by
rw [coe_injective.compl_image_eq, compl_range_coe]
#align alexandroff.compl_image_coe OnePoint.compl_image_coe
theorem ne_infty_iff_exists {x : OnePoint X} : x ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ y : X, (y : OnePoint X) = x := by
induction x using OnePoint.rec <;> simp
#align alexandroff.ne_infty_iff_exists OnePoint.ne_infty_iff_exists
instance canLift : CanLift (OnePoint X) X (↑) fun x => x ≠ ∞ :=
WithTop.canLift
#align alexandroff.can_lift OnePoint.canLift
theorem not_mem_range_coe_iff {x : OnePoint X} : x ∉ range some ↔ x = ∞ := by
rw [← mem_compl_iff, compl_range_coe, mem_singleton_iff]
#align alexandroff.not_mem_range_coe_iff OnePoint.not_mem_range_coe_iff
theorem infty_not_mem_range_coe : ∞ ∉ range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
not_mem_range_coe_iff.2 rfl
#align alexandroff.infty_not_mem_range_coe OnePoint.infty_not_mem_range_coe
theorem infty_not_mem_image_coe {s : Set X} : ∞ ∉ ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) '' s :=
not_mem_subset (image_subset_range _ _) infty_not_mem_range_coe
#align alexandroff.infty_not_mem_image_coe OnePoint.infty_not_mem_image_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_infty : ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' {∞} = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align alexandroff.coe_preimage_infty OnePoint.coe_preimage_infty
/-!
### Topological space structure on `OnePoint X`
We define a topological space structure on `OnePoint X` so that `s` is open if and only if
* `(↑) ⁻¹' s` is open in `X`;
* if `∞ ∈ s`, then `((↑) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ` is compact.
Then we reformulate this definition in a few different ways, and prove that
`(↑) : X → OnePoint X` is an open embedding. If `X` is not a compact space, then we also prove
that `(↑)` has dense range, so it is a dense embedding.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
instance : TopologicalSpace (OnePoint X) where
IsOpen s := (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ) ∧
IsOpen (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro ⟨hms, hs⟩ ⟨hmt, ht⟩
refine ⟨?_, hs.inter ht⟩
rintro ⟨hms', hmt'⟩
simpa [compl_inter] using (hms hms').union (hmt hmt')
isOpen_sUnion S ho := by
suffices IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' ⋃₀ S : Set X) by
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rintro ⟨s, hsS : s ∈ S, hs : ∞ ∈ s⟩
refine IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset ((ho s hsS).1 hs) this.isClosed_compl ?_
exact compl_subset_compl.mpr (preimage_mono <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hsS)
rw [preimage_sUnion]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun s hs => (ho s hs).2
variable {s : Set (OnePoint X)} {t : Set X}
theorem isOpen_def :
IsOpen s ↔ (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ) ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) :=
Iff.rfl
#align alexandroff.is_open_def OnePoint.isOpen_def
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem' (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_mem' OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_mem'
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_of_mem' h, isClosed_compl_iff, and_comm]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_mem OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_mem
theorem isOpen_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) : IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_not_mem OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_not_mem
theorem isClosed_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) : IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
have : ∞ ∉ sᶜ := fun H => H h
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_of_not_mem this, ← isOpen_compl_iff, preimage_compl]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_iff_of_mem OnePoint.isClosed_iff_of_mem
theorem isClosed_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_of_mem (mem_compl h), ← preimage_compl, compl_compl]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_iff_of_not_mem OnePoint.isClosed_iff_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_image_coe {s : Set X} : IsOpen ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X)) ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_not_mem infty_not_mem_image_coe, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
#align alexandroff.is_open_image_coe OnePoint.isOpen_image_coe
theorem isOpen_compl_image_coe {s : Set X} :
IsOpen ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_mem, ← preimage_compl, compl_compl, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
exact infty_not_mem_image_coe
#align alexandroff.is_open_compl_image_coe OnePoint.isOpen_compl_image_coe
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_image_coe {s : Set X} :
IsClosed ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X)) ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_compl_image_coe]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_image_coe OnePoint.isClosed_image_coe
/-- An open set in `OnePoint X` constructed from a closed compact set in `X` -/
def opensOfCompl (s : Set X) (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsCompact s) :
TopologicalSpace.Opens (OnePoint X) :=
⟨((↑) '' s)ᶜ, isOpen_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
#align alexandroff.opens_of_compl OnePoint.opensOfCompl
theorem infty_mem_opensOfCompl {s : Set X} (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsCompact s) :
∞ ∈ opensOfCompl s h₁ h₂ :=
mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe
#align alexandroff.infty_mem_opens_of_compl OnePoint.infty_mem_opensOfCompl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
continuous_def.mpr fun _s hs => hs.right
#align alexandroff.continuous_coe OnePoint.continuous_coe
theorem isOpenMap_coe : IsOpenMap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) := fun _ => isOpen_image_coe.2
#align alexandroff.is_open_map_coe OnePoint.isOpenMap_coe
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_coe coe_injective isOpenMap_coe
#align alexandroff.open_embedding_coe OnePoint.openEmbedding_coe
theorem isOpen_range_coe : IsOpen (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X)) :=
openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range
#align alexandroff.is_open_range_coe OnePoint.isOpen_range_coe
theorem isClosed_infty : IsClosed ({∞} : Set (OnePoint X)) := by
rw [← compl_range_coe, isClosed_compl_iff]
exact isOpen_range_coe
#align alexandroff.is_closed_infty OnePoint.isClosed_infty
theorem nhds_coe_eq (x : X) : 𝓝 ↑x = map ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq x).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_coe_eq OnePoint.nhds_coe_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_coe_image (s : Set X) (x : X) :
𝓝[(↑) '' s] (x : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (𝓝[s] x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq _ _).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_coe_image OnePoint.nhdsWithin_coe_image
theorem nhdsWithin_coe (s : Set (OnePoint X)) (x : X) : 𝓝[s] ↑x = map (↑) (𝓝[(↑) ⁻¹' s] x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhdsWithin_preimage_eq _ _).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_coe OnePoint.nhdsWithin_coe
theorem comap_coe_nhds (x : X) : comap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x :=
(openEmbedding_coe.toInducing.nhds_eq_comap x).symm
#align alexandroff.comap_coe_nhds OnePoint.comap_coe_nhds
/-- If `x` is not an isolated point of `X`, then `x : OnePoint X` is not an isolated point
of `OnePoint X`. -/
instance nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot (x : X) [h : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] :
NeBot (𝓝[≠] (x : OnePoint X)) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_coe, preimage, coe_eq_coe] using h.map some
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_coe_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot
theorem nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq : 𝓝[≠] (∞ : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (coclosedCompact X) := by
refine (nhdsWithin_basis_open ∞ _).ext (hasBasis_coclosedCompact.map _) ?_ ?_
· rintro s ⟨hs, hso⟩
refine ⟨_, (isOpen_iff_of_mem hs).mp hso, ?_⟩
simp [Subset.rfl]
· rintro s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe, isOpen_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩, ?_⟩
simp [compl_image_coe, ← diff_eq, subset_preimage_image]
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_infty_eq OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq
/-- If `X` is a non-compact space, then `∞` is not an isolated point of `OnePoint X`. -/
instance nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot [NoncompactSpace X] : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (∞ : OnePoint X)) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq]
infer_instance
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_infty_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot
instance (priority := 900) nhdsWithin_compl_neBot [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] [NoncompactSpace X]
(x : OnePoint X) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) :=
OnePoint.rec OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot
(fun y => OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot y) x
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_neBot
theorem nhds_infty_eq : 𝓝 (∞ : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (coclosedCompact X) ⊔ pure ∞ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq, nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure]
#align alexandroff.nhds_infty_eq OnePoint.nhds_infty_eq
theorem hasBasis_nhds_infty :
(𝓝 (∞ : OnePoint X)).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s) fun s =>
(↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} := by
rw [nhds_infty_eq]
exact (hasBasis_coclosedCompact.map _).sup_pure _
#align alexandroff.has_basis_nhds_infty OnePoint.hasBasis_nhds_infty
@[simp]
theorem comap_coe_nhds_infty : comap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 ∞) = coclosedCompact X := by
simp [nhds_infty_eq, comap_sup, comap_map coe_injective]
#align alexandroff.comap_coe_nhds_infty OnePoint.comap_coe_nhds_infty
theorem le_nhds_infty {f : Filter (OnePoint X)} :
f ≤ 𝓝 ∞ ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsClosed s → IsCompact s → (↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} ∈ f := by
simp only [hasBasis_nhds_infty.ge_iff, and_imp]
#align alexandroff.le_nhds_infty OnePoint.le_nhds_infty
theorem ultrafilter_le_nhds_infty {f : Ultrafilter (OnePoint X)} :
(f : Filter (OnePoint X)) ≤ 𝓝 ∞ ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsClosed s → IsCompact s → (↑) '' s ∉ f := by
simp only [le_nhds_infty, ← compl_image_coe, Ultrafilter.mem_coe,
Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem]
#align alexandroff.ultrafilter_le_nhds_infty OnePoint.ultrafilter_le_nhds_infty
theorem tendsto_nhds_infty' {α : Type*} {f : OnePoint X → α} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ∞) l ↔ Tendsto f (pure ∞) l ∧ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑)) (coclosedCompact X) l := by
simp [nhds_infty_eq, and_comm]
#align alexandroff.tendsto_nhds_infty' OnePoint.tendsto_nhds_infty'
theorem tendsto_nhds_infty {α : Type*} {f : OnePoint X → α} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ∞) l ↔
∀ s ∈ l, f ∞ ∈ s ∧ ∃ t : Set X, IsClosed t ∧ IsCompact t ∧ MapsTo (f ∘ (↑)) tᶜ s :=
tendsto_nhds_infty'.trans <| by
simp only [tendsto_pure_left, hasBasis_coclosedCompact.tendsto_left_iff, forall_and,
and_assoc, exists_prop]
#align alexandroff.tendsto_nhds_infty OnePoint.tendsto_nhds_infty
theorem continuousAt_infty' {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : OnePoint X → Y} :
ContinuousAt f ∞ ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑)) (coclosedCompact X) (𝓝 (f ∞)) :=
tendsto_nhds_infty'.trans <| and_iff_right (tendsto_pure_nhds _ _)
#align alexandroff.continuous_at_infty' OnePoint.continuousAt_infty'
theorem continuousAt_infty {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : OnePoint X → Y} :
ContinuousAt f ∞ ↔
∀ s ∈ 𝓝 (f ∞), ∃ t : Set X, IsClosed t ∧ IsCompact t ∧ MapsTo (f ∘ (↑)) tᶜ s :=
continuousAt_infty'.trans <| by simp only [hasBasis_coclosedCompact.tendsto_left_iff, and_assoc]
#align alexandroff.continuous_at_infty OnePoint.continuousAt_infty
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactification/OnePoint.lean | 381 | 383 | theorem continuousAt_coe {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : OnePoint X → Y} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑)) x := by |
rw [ContinuousAt, nhds_coe_eq, tendsto_map'_iff, ContinuousAt]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Andrew Zipperer, Haitao Zhang, Minchao Wu, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
#align_import data.set.function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"996b0ff959da753a555053a480f36e5f264d4207"
/-!
# Functions over sets
## Main definitions
### Predicate
* `Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ s` : functions `f₁` and `f₂` are equal at every point of `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo f s t` : `f` sends every point of `s` to a point of `t`;
* `Set.InjOn f s` : restriction of `f` to `s` is injective;
* `Set.SurjOn f s t` : every point in `s` has a preimage in `s`;
* `Set.BijOn f s t` : `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`;
* `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` : for every `x ∈ s` we have `f' (f x) = x`;
* `Set.RightInvOn f' f t` : for every `y ∈ t` we have `f (f' y) = y`;
* `Set.InvOn f' f s t` : `f'` is a two-side inverse of `f` on `s` and `t`, i.e.
we have `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` and `Set.RightInvOn f' f t`.
### Functions
* `Set.restrict f s` : restrict the domain of `f` to the set `s`;
* `Set.codRestrict f s h` : given `h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s`, restrict the codomain of `f` to the set `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo.restrict f s t h`: given `h : MapsTo f s t`, restrict the domain of `f` to `s`
and the codomain to `t`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Restrict -/
section restrict
/-- Restrict domain of a function `f` to a set `s`. Same as `Subtype.restrict` but this version
takes an argument `↥s` instead of `Subtype s`. -/
def restrict (s : Set α) (f : ∀ a : α, π a) : ∀ a : s, π a := fun x => f x
#align set.restrict Set.restrict
theorem restrict_eq (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s.restrict f = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
rfl
#align set.restrict_eq Set.restrict_eq
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : s) : s.restrict f x = f x :=
rfl
#align set.restrict_apply Set.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_eq_iff {f : ∀ a, π a} {s : Set α} {g : ∀ a : s, π a} :
restrict s f = g ↔ ∀ (a) (ha : a ∈ s), f a = g ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
funext_iff.trans Subtype.forall
#align set.restrict_eq_iff Set.restrict_eq_iff
theorem eq_restrict_iff {s : Set α} {f : ∀ a : s, π a} {g : ∀ a, π a} :
f = restrict s g ↔ ∀ (a) (ha : a ∈ s), f ⟨a, ha⟩ = g a :=
funext_iff.trans Subtype.forall
#align set.eq_restrict_iff Set.eq_restrict_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : Set.range (s.restrict f) = f '' s :=
(range_comp _ _).trans <| congr_arg (f '' ·) Subtype.range_coe
#align set.range_restrict Set.range_restrict
theorem image_restrict (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) :
s.restrict f '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) = f '' (t ∩ s) := by
rw [restrict_eq, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.image_restrict Set.image_restrict
@[simp]
theorem restrict_dite {s : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β)
(g : ∀ a ∉ s, β) :
(s.restrict fun a => if h : a ∈ s then f a h else g a h) = (fun a : s => f a a.2) :=
funext fun a => dif_pos a.2
#align set.restrict_dite Set.restrict_dite
@[simp]
theorem restrict_dite_compl {s : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β)
(g : ∀ a ∉ s, β) :
(sᶜ.restrict fun a => if h : a ∈ s then f a h else g a h) = (fun a : (sᶜ : Set α) => g a a.2) :=
funext fun a => dif_neg a.2
#align set.restrict_dite_compl Set.restrict_dite_compl
@[simp]
theorem restrict_ite (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
(s.restrict fun a => if a ∈ s then f a else g a) = s.restrict f :=
restrict_dite _ _
#align set.restrict_ite Set.restrict_ite
@[simp]
theorem restrict_ite_compl (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
(sᶜ.restrict fun a => if a ∈ s then f a else g a) = sᶜ.restrict g :=
restrict_dite_compl _ _
#align set.restrict_ite_compl Set.restrict_ite_compl
@[simp]
theorem restrict_piecewise (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
s.restrict (piecewise s f g) = s.restrict f :=
restrict_ite _ _ _
#align set.restrict_piecewise Set.restrict_piecewise
@[simp]
theorem restrict_piecewise_compl (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
sᶜ.restrict (piecewise s f g) = sᶜ.restrict g :=
restrict_ite_compl _ _ _
#align set.restrict_piecewise_compl Set.restrict_piecewise_compl
theorem restrict_extend_range (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
(range f).restrict (extend f g g') = fun x => g x.coe_prop.choose := by
classical
exact restrict_dite _ _
#align set.restrict_extend_range Set.restrict_extend_range
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend_compl_range (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
(range f)ᶜ.restrict (extend f g g') = g' ∘ Subtype.val := by
classical
exact restrict_dite_compl _ _
#align set.restrict_extend_compl_range Set.restrict_extend_compl_range
theorem range_extend_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
range (extend f g g') ⊆ range g ∪ g' '' (range f)ᶜ := by
classical
rintro _ ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [extend_def]
split_ifs with h
exacts [Or.inl (mem_range_self _), Or.inr (mem_image_of_mem _ h)]
#align set.range_extend_subset Set.range_extend_subset
theorem range_extend {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
range (extend f g g') = range g ∪ g' '' (range f)ᶜ := by
refine (range_extend_subset _ _ _).antisymm ?_
rintro z (⟨x, rfl⟩ | ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨f x, hf.extend_apply _ _ _⟩, ⟨y, extend_apply' _ _ _ hy⟩]
#align set.range_extend Set.range_extend
/-- Restrict codomain of a function `f` to a set `s`. Same as `Subtype.coind` but this version
has codomain `↥s` instead of `Subtype s`. -/
def codRestrict (f : ι → α) (s : Set α) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : ι → s := fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩
#align set.cod_restrict Set.codRestrict
@[simp]
theorem val_codRestrict_apply (f : ι → α) (s : Set α) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) (x : ι) :
(codRestrict f s h x : α) = f x :=
rfl
#align set.coe_cod_restrict_apply Set.val_codRestrict_apply
@[simp]
theorem restrict_comp_codRestrict {f : ι → α} {g : α → β} {b : Set α} (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ b) :
b.restrict g ∘ b.codRestrict f h = g ∘ f :=
rfl
#align set.restrict_comp_cod_restrict Set.restrict_comp_codRestrict
@[simp]
theorem injective_codRestrict {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) :
Injective (codRestrict f s h) ↔ Injective f := by
simp only [Injective, Subtype.ext_iff, val_codRestrict_apply]
#align set.injective_cod_restrict Set.injective_codRestrict
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Injective.codRestrict⟩ := injective_codRestrict
#align function.injective.cod_restrict Function.Injective.codRestrict
end restrict
/-! ### Equality on a set -/
section equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_empty (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
#align set.eq_on_empty Set.eqOn_empty
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_singleton : Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ {a} ↔ f₁ a = f₂ a := by
simp [Set.EqOn]
#align set.eq_on_singleton Set.eqOn_singleton
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_univ (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ univ ↔ f₁ = f₂ := by
simp [EqOn, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_restrict_iff : restrict s f₁ = restrict s f₂ ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s :=
restrict_eq_iff
#align set.restrict_eq_restrict_iff Set.restrict_eq_restrict_iff
@[symm]
theorem EqOn.symm (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : EqOn f₂ f₁ s := fun _ hx => (h hx).symm
#align set.eq_on.symm Set.EqOn.symm
theorem eqOn_comm : EqOn f₁ f₂ s ↔ EqOn f₂ f₁ s :=
⟨EqOn.symm, EqOn.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on_comm Set.eqOn_comm
-- This can not be tagged as `@[refl]` with the current argument order.
-- See note below at `EqOn.trans`.
theorem eqOn_refl (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : EqOn f f s := fun _ _ => rfl
#align set.eq_on_refl Set.eqOn_refl
-- Note: this was formerly tagged with `@[trans]`, and although the `trans` attribute accepted it
-- the `trans` tactic could not use it.
-- An update to the trans tactic coming in mathlib4#7014 will reject this attribute.
-- It can be restored by changing the argument order from `EqOn f₁ f₂ s` to `EqOn s f₁ f₂`.
-- This change will be made separately: [zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Reordering.20arguments.20of.20.60Set.2EEqOn.60/near/390467581).
theorem EqOn.trans (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (h₂ : EqOn f₂ f₃ s) : EqOn f₁ f₃ s := fun _ hx =>
(h₁ hx).trans (h₂ hx)
#align set.eq_on.trans Set.EqOn.trans
theorem EqOn.image_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
#align set.eq_on.image_eq Set.EqOn.image_eq
/-- Variant of `EqOn.image_eq`, for one function being the identity. -/
theorem EqOn.image_eq_self {f : α → α} (h : Set.EqOn f id s) : f '' s = s := by
rw [h.image_eq, image_id]
theorem EqOn.inter_preimage_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (t : Set β) : s ∩ f₁ ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' t :=
ext fun x => and_congr_right_iff.2 fun hx => by rw [mem_preimage, mem_preimage, heq hx]
#align set.eq_on.inter_preimage_eq Set.EqOn.inter_preimage_eq
theorem EqOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ := fun _ hx => hf (hs hx)
#align set.eq_on.mono Set.EqOn.mono
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_union : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ ∧ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂ :=
forall₂_or_left
#align set.eq_on_union Set.eqOn_union
theorem EqOn.union (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁) (h₂ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
eqOn_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align set.eq_on.union Set.EqOn.union
theorem EqOn.comp_left (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) := fun _ ha =>
congr_arg _ <| h ha
#align set.eq_on.comp_left Set.EqOn.comp_left
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_range {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → α} {g₁ g₂ : α → β} :
EqOn g₁ g₂ (range f) ↔ g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f :=
forall_mem_range.trans <| funext_iff.symm
#align set.eq_on_range Set.eqOn_range
alias ⟨EqOn.comp_eq, _⟩ := eqOn_range
#align set.eq_on.comp_eq Set.EqOn.comp_eq
end equality
/-! ### Congruence lemmas for monotonicity and antitonicity -/
section Order
variable {s : Set α} {f₁ f₂ : α → β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.congr (h₁ : MonotoneOn f₁ s) (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : MonotoneOn f₂ s := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [← h ha, ← h hb]
exact h₁ ha hb hab
#align monotone_on.congr MonotoneOn.congr
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.congr (h₁ : AntitoneOn f₁ s) (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : AntitoneOn f₂ s :=
h₁.dual_right.congr h
#align antitone_on.congr AntitoneOn.congr
theorem _root_.StrictMonoOn.congr (h₁ : StrictMonoOn f₁ s) (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) :
StrictMonoOn f₂ s := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [← h ha, ← h hb]
exact h₁ ha hb hab
#align strict_mono_on.congr StrictMonoOn.congr
theorem _root_.StrictAntiOn.congr (h₁ : StrictAntiOn f₁ s) (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : StrictAntiOn f₂ s :=
h₁.dual_right.congr h
#align strict_anti_on.congr StrictAntiOn.congr
theorem EqOn.congr_monotoneOn (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : MonotoneOn f₁ s ↔ MonotoneOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h₁ => h₁.congr h, fun h₂ => h₂.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.congr_monotone_on Set.EqOn.congr_monotoneOn
theorem EqOn.congr_antitoneOn (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : AntitoneOn f₁ s ↔ AntitoneOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h₁ => h₁.congr h, fun h₂ => h₂.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.congr_antitone_on Set.EqOn.congr_antitoneOn
theorem EqOn.congr_strictMonoOn (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : StrictMonoOn f₁ s ↔ StrictMonoOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h₁ => h₁.congr h, fun h₂ => h₂.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.congr_strict_mono_on Set.EqOn.congr_strictMonoOn
theorem EqOn.congr_strictAntiOn (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : StrictAntiOn f₁ s ↔ StrictAntiOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h₁ => h₁.congr h, fun h₂ => h₂.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.congr_strict_anti_on Set.EqOn.congr_strictAntiOn
end Order
/-! ### Monotonicity lemmas-/
section Mono
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.mono (h : MonotoneOn f s) (h' : s₂ ⊆ s) : MonotoneOn f s₂ :=
fun _ hx _ hy => h (h' hx) (h' hy)
#align monotone_on.mono MonotoneOn.mono
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.mono (h : AntitoneOn f s) (h' : s₂ ⊆ s) : AntitoneOn f s₂ :=
fun _ hx _ hy => h (h' hx) (h' hy)
#align antitone_on.mono AntitoneOn.mono
theorem _root_.StrictMonoOn.mono (h : StrictMonoOn f s) (h' : s₂ ⊆ s) : StrictMonoOn f s₂ :=
fun _ hx _ hy => h (h' hx) (h' hy)
#align strict_mono_on.mono StrictMonoOn.mono
theorem _root_.StrictAntiOn.mono (h : StrictAntiOn f s) (h' : s₂ ⊆ s) : StrictAntiOn f s₂ :=
fun _ hx _ hy => h (h' hx) (h' hy)
#align strict_anti_on.mono StrictAntiOn.mono
protected theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.monotone (h : MonotoneOn f s) :
Monotone (f ∘ Subtype.val : s → β) :=
fun x y hle => h x.coe_prop y.coe_prop hle
#align monotone_on.monotone MonotoneOn.monotone
protected theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.monotone (h : AntitoneOn f s) :
Antitone (f ∘ Subtype.val : s → β) :=
fun x y hle => h x.coe_prop y.coe_prop hle
#align antitone_on.monotone AntitoneOn.monotone
protected theorem _root_.StrictMonoOn.strictMono (h : StrictMonoOn f s) :
StrictMono (f ∘ Subtype.val : s → β) :=
fun x y hlt => h x.coe_prop y.coe_prop hlt
#align strict_mono_on.strict_mono StrictMonoOn.strictMono
protected theorem _root_.StrictAntiOn.strictAnti (h : StrictAntiOn f s) :
StrictAnti (f ∘ Subtype.val : s → β) :=
fun x y hlt => h x.coe_prop y.coe_prop hlt
#align strict_anti_on.strict_anti StrictAntiOn.strictAnti
end Mono
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
section MapsTo
theorem MapsTo.restrict_commutes (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (h : MapsTo f s t) :
Subtype.val ∘ h.restrict f s t = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem MapsTo.val_restrict_apply (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : s) : (h.restrict f s t x : β) = f x :=
rfl
#align set.maps_to.coe_restrict_apply Set.MapsTo.val_restrict_apply
theorem MapsTo.coe_iterate_restrict {f : α → α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (x : s) (k : ℕ) :
h.restrict^[k] x = f^[k] x := by
induction' k with k ih; · simp
simp only [iterate_succ', comp_apply, val_restrict_apply, ih]
/-- Restricting the domain and then the codomain is the same as `MapsTo.restrict`. -/
@[simp]
theorem codRestrict_restrict (h : ∀ x : s, f x ∈ t) :
codRestrict (s.restrict f) t h = MapsTo.restrict f s t fun x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
rfl
#align set.cod_restrict_restrict Set.codRestrict_restrict
/-- Reverse of `Set.codRestrict_restrict`. -/
theorem MapsTo.restrict_eq_codRestrict (h : MapsTo f s t) :
h.restrict f s t = codRestrict (s.restrict f) t fun x => h x.2 :=
rfl
#align set.maps_to.restrict_eq_cod_restrict Set.MapsTo.restrict_eq_codRestrict
theorem MapsTo.coe_restrict (h : Set.MapsTo f s t) :
Subtype.val ∘ h.restrict f s t = s.restrict f :=
rfl
#align set.maps_to.coe_restrict Set.MapsTo.coe_restrict
theorem MapsTo.range_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (h : MapsTo f s t) :
range (h.restrict f s t) = Subtype.val ⁻¹' (f '' s) :=
Set.range_subtype_map f h
#align set.maps_to.range_restrict Set.MapsTo.range_restrict
theorem mapsTo_iff_exists_map_subtype : MapsTo f s t ↔ ∃ g : s → t, ∀ x : s, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.restrict f s t, fun _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨g, hg⟩ x hx => by
erw [hg ⟨x, hx⟩]
apply Subtype.coe_prop⟩
#align set.maps_to_iff_exists_map_subtype Set.mapsTo_iff_exists_map_subtype
theorem mapsTo' : MapsTo f s t ↔ f '' s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.symm
#align set.maps_to' Set.mapsTo'
theorem mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal : MapsTo (Prod.map f f) (diagonal α) (diagonal β) :=
diagonal_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
#align set.maps_to_prod_map_diagonal Set.mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal
theorem MapsTo.subset_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hf : MapsTo f s t) :
s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
hf
#align set.maps_to.subset_preimage Set.MapsTo.subset_preimage
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_singleton {x : α} : MapsTo f {x} t ↔ f x ∈ t :=
singleton_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_singleton Set.mapsTo_singleton
theorem mapsTo_empty (f : α → β) (t : Set β) : MapsTo f ∅ t :=
empty_subset _
#align set.maps_to_empty Set.mapsTo_empty
@[simp] theorem mapsTo_empty_iff : MapsTo f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [mapsTo', subset_empty_iff]
/-- If `f` maps `s` to `t` and `s` is non-empty, `t` is non-empty. -/
theorem MapsTo.nonempty (h : MapsTo f s t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(hs.image f).mono (mapsTo'.mp h)
theorem MapsTo.image_subset (h : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s ⊆ t :=
mapsTo'.1 h
#align set.maps_to.image_subset Set.MapsTo.image_subset
theorem MapsTo.congr (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₂ s t := fun _ hx =>
h hx ▸ h₁ hx
#align set.maps_to.congr Set.MapsTo.congr
theorem EqOn.comp_right (hg : t.EqOn g₁ g₂) (hf : s.MapsTo f t) : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) :=
fun _ ha => hg <| hf ha
#align set.eq_on.comp_right Set.EqOn.comp_right
theorem EqOn.mapsTo_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₁ s t ↔ MapsTo f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.maps_to_iff Set.EqOn.mapsTo_iff
theorem MapsTo.comp (h₁ : MapsTo g t p) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s p := fun _ h =>
h₁ (h₂ h)
#align set.maps_to.comp Set.MapsTo.comp
theorem mapsTo_id (s : Set α) : MapsTo id s s := fun _ => id
#align set.maps_to_id Set.mapsTo_id
theorem MapsTo.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) : ∀ n, MapsTo f^[n] s s
| 0 => fun _ => id
| n + 1 => (MapsTo.iterate h n).comp h
#align set.maps_to.iterate Set.MapsTo.iterate
theorem MapsTo.iterate_restrict {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) :
(h.restrict f s s)^[n] = (h.iterate n).restrict _ _ _ := by
funext x
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, MapsTo.val_restrict_apply]
induction' n with n ihn generalizing x
· rfl
· simp [Nat.iterate, ihn]
#align set.maps_to.iterate_restrict Set.MapsTo.iterate_restrict
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty) :
MapsTo f s t :=
fun a ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| h ⟨a, ha⟩
#align set.maps_to_of_subsingleton' Set.mapsTo_of_subsingleton'
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s s :=
mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ id
#align set.maps_to_of_subsingleton Set.mapsTo_of_subsingleton
theorem MapsTo.mono (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s₂ t₂ :=
fun _ hx => ht (hf <| hs hx)
#align set.maps_to.mono Set.MapsTo.mono
theorem MapsTo.mono_left (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : MapsTo f s₂ t := fun _ hx =>
hf (hs hx)
#align set.maps_to.mono_left Set.MapsTo.mono_left
theorem MapsTo.mono_right (hf : MapsTo f s t₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s t₂ := fun _ hx =>
ht (hf hx)
#align set.maps_to.mono_right Set.MapsTo.mono_right
theorem MapsTo.union_union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => Or.inl <| h₁ hx) fun hx => Or.inr <| h₂ hx
#align set.maps_to.union_union Set.MapsTo.union_union
theorem MapsTo.union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t) : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t :=
union_self t ▸ h₁.union_union h₂
#align set.maps_to.union Set.MapsTo.union
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_union : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t ↔ MapsTo f s₁ t ∧ MapsTo f s₂ t :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl t),
h.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl t)⟩,
fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
#align set.maps_to_union Set.mapsTo_union
theorem MapsTo.inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t₂) : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩
#align set.maps_to.inter Set.MapsTo.inter
theorem MapsTo.inter_inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
#align set.maps_to.inter_inter Set.MapsTo.inter_inter
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_inter : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) ↔ MapsTo f s t₁ ∧ MapsTo f s t₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_left,
h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.inter h.2⟩
#align set.maps_to_inter Set.mapsTo_inter
theorem mapsTo_univ (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s univ := fun _ _ => trivial
#align set.maps_to_univ Set.mapsTo_univ
theorem mapsTo_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s (range f) :=
(mapsTo_image f s).mono (Subset.refl s) (image_subset_range _ _)
#align set.maps_to_range Set.mapsTo_range
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_image_iff {f : α → β} {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} {t : Set β} :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
⟨fun h c hc => h ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hc⟩ => hc.2 ▸ h hc.1⟩
#align set.maps_image_to Set.mapsTo_image_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2023-12-25")]
lemma maps_image_to (f : α → β) (g : γ → α) (s : Set γ) (t : Set β) :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
mapsTo_image_iff
lemma MapsTo.comp_left (g : β → γ) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hf hx, rfl⟩
#align set.maps_to.comp_left Set.MapsTo.comp_left
lemma MapsTo.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hg : MapsTo g s t) (f : α → β) :
MapsTo (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := fun _ hx ↦ hg hx
#align set.maps_to.comp_right Set.MapsTo.comp_right
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_univ_iff : MapsTo f univ t ↔ ∀ x, f x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h _ => h (mem_univ _), fun h x _ => h x⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2023-12-25")]
theorem maps_univ_to (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : MapsTo f univ s ↔ ∀ a, f a ∈ s :=
mapsTo_univ_iff
#align set.maps_univ_to Set.maps_univ_to
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_range_iff {g : ι → α} : MapsTo f (range g) t ↔ ∀ i, f (g i) ∈ t :=
forall_mem_range
@[deprecated mapsTo_range_iff (since := "2023-12-25")]
theorem maps_range_to (f : α → β) (g : γ → α) (s : Set β) :
MapsTo f (range g) s ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) univ s := by rw [← image_univ, mapsTo_image_iff]
#align set.maps_range_to Set.maps_range_to
theorem surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
Surjective ((mapsTo_image f s).restrict f s (f '' s)) := fun ⟨_, x, hs, hxy⟩ =>
⟨⟨x, hs⟩, Subtype.ext hxy⟩
#align set.surjective_maps_to_image_restrict Set.surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict
theorem MapsTo.mem_iff (h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ) {x} : f x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun ht => by_contra fun hs => hc hs ht, fun hx => h hx⟩
#align set.maps_to.mem_iff Set.MapsTo.mem_iff
end MapsTo
/-! ### Restriction onto preimage -/
section
variable (t)
variable (f s) in
theorem image_restrictPreimage :
t.restrictPreimage f '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' s) = Subtype.val ⁻¹' (f '' s) := by
delta Set.restrictPreimage
rw [← (Subtype.coe_injective).image_injective.eq_iff, ← image_comp, MapsTo.restrict_commutes,
image_comp, Subtype.image_preimage_coe, Subtype.image_preimage_coe, image_preimage_inter]
variable (f) in
theorem range_restrictPreimage : range (t.restrictPreimage f) = Subtype.val ⁻¹' range f := by
simp only [← image_univ, ← image_restrictPreimage, preimage_univ]
#align set.range_restrict_preimage Set.range_restrictPreimage
variable {U : ι → Set β}
lemma restrictPreimage_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (t.restrictPreimage f) :=
fun _ _ e => Subtype.coe_injective <| hf <| Subtype.mk.inj e
#align set.restrict_preimage_injective Set.restrictPreimage_injective
lemma restrictPreimage_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (t.restrictPreimage f) :=
fun x => ⟨⟨_, ((hf x).choose_spec.symm ▸ x.2 : _ ∈ t)⟩, Subtype.ext (hf x).choose_spec⟩
#align set.restrict_preimage_surjective Set.restrictPreimage_surjective
lemma restrictPreimage_bijective (hf : Bijective f) : Bijective (t.restrictPreimage f) :=
⟨t.restrictPreimage_injective hf.1, t.restrictPreimage_surjective hf.2⟩
#align set.restrict_preimage_bijective Set.restrictPreimage_bijective
alias _root_.Function.Injective.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_injective
alias _root_.Function.Surjective.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_surjective
alias _root_.Function.Bijective.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_bijective
#align function.bijective.restrict_preimage Function.Bijective.restrictPreimage
#align function.surjective.restrict_preimage Function.Surjective.restrictPreimage
#align function.injective.restrict_preimage Function.Injective.restrictPreimage
end
/-! ### Injectivity on a set -/
section injOn
theorem Subsingleton.injOn (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : InjOn f s := fun _ hx _ hy _ =>
hs hx hy
#align set.subsingleton.inj_on Set.Subsingleton.injOn
@[simp]
theorem injOn_empty (f : α → β) : InjOn f ∅ :=
subsingleton_empty.injOn f
#align set.inj_on_empty Set.injOn_empty
@[simp]
theorem injOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : InjOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.injOn f
#align set.inj_on_singleton Set.injOn_singleton
@[simp] lemma injOn_pair {b : α} : InjOn f {a, b} ↔ f a = f b → a = b := by unfold InjOn; aesop
theorem InjOn.eq_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y ↔ x = y :=
⟨h hx hy, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
#align set.inj_on.eq_iff Set.InjOn.eq_iff
theorem InjOn.ne_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
(h.eq_iff hx hy).not
#align set.inj_on.ne_iff Set.InjOn.ne_iff
alias ⟨_, InjOn.ne⟩ := InjOn.ne_iff
#align set.inj_on.ne Set.InjOn.ne
theorem InjOn.congr (h₁ : InjOn f₁ s) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₂ s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
h hx ▸ h hy ▸ h₁ hx hy
#align set.inj_on.congr Set.InjOn.congr
theorem EqOn.injOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₁ s ↔ InjOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.inj_on_iff Set.EqOn.injOn_iff
theorem InjOn.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : InjOn f s₂) : InjOn f s₁ := fun _ hx _ hy H =>
ht (h hx) (h hy) H
#align set.inj_on.mono Set.InjOn.mono
theorem injOn_union (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ InjOn f s₁ ∧ InjOn f s₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁, ∀ y ∈ s₂, f x ≠ f y := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.mono subset_union_left, H.mono subset_union_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· intro x hx y hy hxy
obtain rfl : x = y := H (Or.inl hx) (Or.inr hy) hxy
exact h.le_bot ⟨hx, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂, h₁₂⟩
rintro x (hx | hx) y (hy | hy) hxy
exacts [h₁ hx hy hxy, (h₁₂ _ hx _ hy hxy).elim, (h₁₂ _ hy _ hx hxy.symm).elim, h₂ hx hy hxy]
#align set.inj_on_union Set.injOn_union
theorem injOn_insert {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) :
Set.InjOn f (insert a s) ↔ Set.InjOn f s ∧ f a ∉ f '' s := by
rw [← union_singleton, injOn_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has)]
simp
#align set.inj_on_insert Set.injOn_insert
theorem injective_iff_injOn_univ : Injective f ↔ InjOn f univ :=
⟨fun h _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy, fun h _ _ heq => h trivial trivial heq⟩
#align set.injective_iff_inj_on_univ Set.injective_iff_injOn_univ
theorem injOn_of_injective (h : Injective f) {s : Set α} : InjOn f s := fun _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy
#align set.inj_on_of_injective Set.injOn_of_injective
alias _root_.Function.Injective.injOn := injOn_of_injective
#align function.injective.inj_on Function.Injective.injOn
-- A specialization of `injOn_of_injective` for `Subtype.val`.
theorem injOn_subtype_val {s : Set { x // p x }} : Set.InjOn Subtype.val s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
lemma injOn_id (s : Set α) : InjOn id s := injective_id.injOn
#align set.inj_on_id Set.injOn_id
theorem InjOn.comp (hg : InjOn g t) (hf : InjOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq => hf hx hy <| hg (h hx) (h hy) heq
#align set.inj_on.comp Set.InjOn.comp
lemma InjOn.image_of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn g (f '' s) :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy heq ↦ congr_arg f <| h hx hy heq
lemma InjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hf : MapsTo f s s) :
∀ n, InjOn f^[n] s
| 0 => injOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate hf n).comp h hf
#align set.inj_on.iterate Set.InjOn.iterate
lemma injOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : InjOn f s :=
(injective_of_subsingleton _).injOn
#align set.inj_on_of_subsingleton Set.injOn_of_subsingleton
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.injOn_range (h : Injective (g ∘ f)) : InjOn g (range f) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ H
exact congr_arg f (h H)
#align function.injective.inj_on_range Function.Injective.injOn_range
theorem injOn_iff_injective : InjOn f s ↔ Injective (s.restrict f) :=
⟨fun H a b h => Subtype.eq <| H a.2 b.2 h, fun H a as b bs h =>
congr_arg Subtype.val <| @H ⟨a, as⟩ ⟨b, bs⟩ h⟩
#align set.inj_on_iff_injective Set.injOn_iff_injective
alias ⟨InjOn.injective, _⟩ := Set.injOn_iff_injective
#align set.inj_on.injective Set.InjOn.injective
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 714 | 715 | theorem MapsTo.restrict_inj (h : MapsTo f s t) : Injective (h.restrict f s t) ↔ InjOn f s := by |
rw [h.restrict_eq_codRestrict, injective_codRestrict, injOn_iff_injective]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicIntegers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ZMod
#align_import number_theory.padics.ring_homs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"565eb991e264d0db702722b4bde52ee5173c9950"
/-!
# Relating `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod (p ^ n)`
In this file we establish connections between the `p`-adic integers $\mathbb{Z}_p$
and the integers modulo powers of `p`, $\mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$.
## Main declarations
We show that $\mathbb{Z}_p$ has a ring hom to $\mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$ for each `n`.
The case for `n = 1` is handled separately, since it is used in the general construction
and we may want to use it without the `^1` getting in the way.
* `PadicInt.toZMod`: ring hom to `ZMod p`
* `PadicInt.toZModPow`: ring hom to `ZMod (p^n)`
* `PadicInt.ker_toZMod` / `PadicInt.ker_toZModPow`: the kernels of these maps are the ideals
generated by `p^n`
We also establish the universal property of $\mathbb{Z}_p$ as a projective limit.
Given a family of compatible ring homs $f_k : R \to \mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$,
there is a unique limit $R \to \mathbb{Z}_p$.
* `PadicInt.lift`: the limit function
* `PadicInt.lift_spec` / `PadicInt.lift_unique`: the universal property
## Implementation notes
The ring hom constructions go through an auxiliary constructor `PadicInt.toZModHom`,
which removes some boilerplate code.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Nat LocalRing Padic
namespace PadicInt
variable {p : ℕ} [hp_prime : Fact p.Prime]
section RingHoms
/-! ### Ring homomorphisms to `ZMod p` and `ZMod (p ^ n)` -/
variable (p) (r : ℚ)
/-- `modPart p r` is an integer that satisfies
`‖(r - modPart p r : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1` when `‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1`,
see `PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart`.
It is the unique non-negative integer that is `< p` with this property.
(Note that this definition assumes `r : ℚ`.
See `PadicInt.zmodRepr` for a version that takes values in `ℕ`
and works for arbitrary `x : ℤ_[p]`.) -/
def modPart : ℤ :=
r.num * gcdA r.den p % p
#align padic_int.mod_part PadicInt.modPart
variable {p}
theorem modPart_lt_p : modPart p r < p := by
convert Int.emod_lt _ _
· simp
· exact mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
#align padic_int.mod_part_lt_p PadicInt.modPart_lt_p
theorem modPart_nonneg : 0 ≤ modPart p r :=
Int.emod_nonneg _ <| mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
#align padic_int.mod_part_nonneg PadicInt.modPart_nonneg
theorem isUnit_den (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : IsUnit (r.den : ℤ_[p]) := by
rw [isUnit_iff]
apply le_antisymm (r.den : ℤ_[p]).2
rw [← not_lt, coe_natCast]
intro norm_denom_lt
have hr : ‖(r * r.den : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ := by
congr
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rw [padicNormE.mul] at hr
have key : ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
calc
_ = _ := hr.symm
_ < 1 * 1 := mul_lt_mul' h norm_denom_lt (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one
_ = 1 := mul_one 1
have : ↑p ∣ r.num ∧ (p : ℤ) ∣ r.den := by
simp only [← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← padic_norm_e_of_padicInt]
exact ⟨key, norm_denom_lt⟩
apply hp_prime.1.not_dvd_one
rwa [← r.reduced.gcd_eq_one, Nat.dvd_gcd_iff, ← Int.natCast_dvd, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
#align padic_int.is_unit_denom PadicInt.isUnit_den
theorem norm_sub_modPart_aux (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
↑p ∣ r.num - r.num * r.den.gcdA p % p * ↑r.den := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_mod, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_sub]
have := congr_arg (fun x => x % p : ℤ → ZMod p) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab r.den p)
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, CharP.cast_eq_zero, EuclideanDomain.mod_zero, Int.cast_add,
Int.cast_mul, zero_mul, add_zero] at this
push_cast
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc, ← this]
suffices rdcp : r.den.Coprime p by
rw [rdcp.gcd_eq_one]
simp only [mul_one, cast_one, sub_self]
apply Coprime.symm
apply (coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp_prime.1 _).resolve_right
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, not_lt]
apply ge_of_eq
rw [← isUnit_iff]
exact isUnit_den r h
#align padic_int.norm_sub_mod_part_aux PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart_aux
theorem norm_sub_modPart (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - modPart p r : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
let n := modPart p r
rw [norm_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← (isUnit_den r h).dvd_mul_right]
suffices ↑p ∣ r.num - n * r.den by
convert (Int.castRingHom ℤ_[p]).map_dvd this
simp only [sub_mul, Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast, Int.cast_mul, sub_left_inj, Int.cast_sub]
apply Subtype.coe_injective
simp only [coe_mul, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast]
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rfl
exact norm_sub_modPart_aux r h
#align padic_int.norm_sub_mod_part PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart
theorem exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
∃ n : ℤ, 0 ≤ n ∧ n < p ∧ ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - n : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 :=
⟨modPart p r, modPart_nonneg _, modPart_lt_p _, norm_sub_modPart _ h⟩
#align padic_int.exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one PadicInt.exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℤ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton] at ha hb
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_pow]
rw [← dvd_neg, neg_sub] at ha
have := dvd_add ha hb
rwa [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ←
Int.cast_sub, pow_p_dvd_int_iff] at this
#align padic_int.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux PadicInt.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
simpa using zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux n x a b ha hb
#align padic_int.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span PadicInt.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ) (hm : x - m ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p])
(hn : x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p]) : (m : ZMod p) = n := by
rw [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p] at hm hn
have := zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux 1 x m n
simp only [pow_one] at this
specialize this hm hn
apply_fun ZMod.castHom (show p ∣ p ^ 1 by rw [pow_one]) (ZMod p) at this
simp only [map_intCast] at this
simpa only [Int.cast_natCast] using this
#align padic_int.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal PadicInt.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal
variable (x : ℤ_[p])
theorem exists_mem_range : ∃ n : ℕ, n < p ∧ x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
simp only [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p, Ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← norm_lt_one_iff_dvd]
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense p (x : ℚ_[p]) zero_lt_one
have H : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1 := by
rw [norm_sub_rev] at hr
calc
_ = ‖(r : ℚ_[p]) - x + x‖ := by ring_nf
_ ≤ _ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
_ ≤ _ := max_le (le_of_lt hr) x.2
obtain ⟨n, hzn, hnp, hn⟩ := exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one r H
lift n to ℕ using hzn
use n
constructor
· exact mod_cast hnp
simp only [norm_def, coe_sub, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast] at hn ⊢
rw [show (x - n : ℚ_[p]) = x - r + (r - n) by ring]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _)
apply max_lt hr
simpa using hn
#align padic_int.exists_mem_range PadicInt.exists_mem_range
/-- `zmod_repr x` is the unique natural number smaller than `p`
satisfying `‖(x - zmod_repr x : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1`.
-/
def zmodRepr : ℕ :=
Classical.choose (exists_mem_range x)
#align padic_int.zmod_repr PadicInt.zmodRepr
theorem zmodRepr_spec : zmodRepr x < p ∧ x - zmodRepr x ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_mem_range x)
#align padic_int.zmod_repr_spec PadicInt.zmodRepr_spec
theorem zmodRepr_lt_p : zmodRepr x < p :=
(zmodRepr_spec _).1
#align padic_int.zmod_repr_lt_p PadicInt.zmodRepr_lt_p
theorem sub_zmodRepr_mem : x - zmodRepr x ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] :=
(zmodRepr_spec _).2
#align padic_int.sub_zmod_repr_mem PadicInt.sub_zmodRepr_mem
/-- `toZModHom` is an auxiliary constructor for creating ring homs from `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod v`.
-/
def toZModHom (v : ℕ) (f : ℤ_[p] → ℕ) (f_spec : ∀ x, x - f x ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]))
(f_congr :
∀ (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ),
x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) →
x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) → (a : ZMod v) = b) :
ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod v where
toFun x := f x
map_zero' := by
dsimp only
rw [f_congr (0 : ℤ_[p]) _ 0, cast_zero]
· exact f_spec _
· simp only [sub_zero, cast_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
map_one' := by
dsimp only
rw [f_congr (1 : ℤ_[p]) _ 1, cast_one]
· exact f_spec _
· simp only [sub_self, cast_one, Submodule.zero_mem]
map_add' := by
intro x y
dsimp only
rw [f_congr (x + y) _ (f x + f y), cast_add]
· exact f_spec _
· convert Ideal.add_mem _ (f_spec x) (f_spec y) using 1
rw [cast_add]
ring
map_mul' := by
intro x y
dsimp only
rw [f_congr (x * y) _ (f x * f y), cast_mul]
· exact f_spec _
· let I : Ideal ℤ_[p] := Ideal.span {↑v}
convert I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left x (f_spec y)) (I.mul_mem_right ↑(f y) (f_spec x)) using 1
rw [cast_mul]
ring
#align padic_int.to_zmod_hom PadicInt.toZModHom
/-- `toZMod` is a ring hom from `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod p`,
with the equality `toZMod x = (zmodRepr x : ZMod p)`.
-/
def toZMod : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod p :=
toZModHom p zmodRepr
(by
rw [← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
exact sub_zmodRepr_mem)
(by
rw [← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
exact zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal)
#align padic_int.to_zmod PadicInt.toZMod
/-- `z - (toZMod z : ℤ_[p])` is contained in the maximal ideal of `ℤ_[p]`, for every `z : ℤ_[p]`.
The coercion from `ZMod p` to `ℤ_[p]` is `ZMod.cast`,
which coerces `ZMod p` into arbitrary rings.
This is unfortunate, but a consequence of the fact that we allow `ZMod p`
to coerce to rings of arbitrary characteristic, instead of only rings of characteristic `p`.
This coercion is only a ring homomorphism if it coerces into a ring whose characteristic divides
`p`. While this is not the case here we can still make use of the coercion.
-/
theorem toZMod_spec : x - (ZMod.cast (toZMod x) : ℤ_[p]) ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
convert sub_zmodRepr_mem x using 2
dsimp [toZMod, toZModHom]
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hp_prime.1.pos with ⟨p', rfl⟩
change ↑((_ : ZMod (0 + p' + 1)).val) = (_ : ℤ_[0 + p' + 1])
simp only [ZMod.val_natCast, add_zero, add_def, Nat.cast_inj, zero_add]
apply mod_eq_of_lt
simpa only [zero_add] using zmodRepr_lt_p x
#align padic_int.to_zmod_spec PadicInt.toZMod_spec
theorem ker_toZMod : RingHom.ker (toZMod : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod p) = maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
ext x
rw [RingHom.mem_ker]
constructor
· intro h
simpa only [h, ZMod.cast_zero, sub_zero] using toZMod_spec x
· intro h
rw [← sub_zero x] at h
dsimp [toZMod, toZModHom]
convert zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal x _ 0 _ h
· norm_cast
· apply sub_zmodRepr_mem
#align padic_int.ker_to_zmod PadicInt.ker_toZMod
/-- `appr n x` gives a value `v : ℕ` such that `x` and `↑v : ℤ_p` are congruent mod `p^n`.
See `appr_spec`. -/
-- Porting note: removing irreducible solves a lot of problems
noncomputable def appr : ℤ_[p] → ℕ → ℕ
| _x, 0 => 0
| x, n + 1 =>
let y := x - appr x n
if hy : y = 0 then appr x n
else
let u := (unitCoeff hy : ℤ_[p])
appr x n + p ^ n * (toZMod ((u * (p : ℤ_[p]) ^ (y.valuation - n).natAbs) : ℤ_[p])).val
#align padic_int.appr PadicInt.appr
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/RingHoms.lean | 310 | 326 | theorem appr_lt (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : x.appr n < p ^ n := by |
induction' n with n ih generalizing x
· simp only [appr, zero_eq, _root_.pow_zero, zero_lt_one]
simp only [appr, map_natCast, ZMod.natCast_self, RingHom.map_pow, Int.natAbs, RingHom.map_mul]
have hp : p ^ n < p ^ (n + 1) := by apply pow_lt_pow_right hp_prime.1.one_lt (lt_add_one n)
split_ifs with h
· apply lt_trans (ih _) hp
· calc
_ < p ^ n + p ^ n * (p - 1) := ?_
_ = p ^ (n + 1) := ?_
· apply add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (ih _)
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
apply le_pred_of_lt
apply ZMod.val_lt
· rw [mul_tsub, mul_one, ← _root_.pow_succ]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hp)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.BumpFunction.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Atlas
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.NormedSpace
#align_import geometry.manifold.bump_function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b018406ad2f2a73223a3a9e198ccae61e6f05318"
/-!
# Smooth bump functions on a smooth manifold
In this file we define `SmoothBumpFunction I c` to be a bundled smooth "bump" function centered at
`c`. It is a structure that consists of two real numbers `0 < rIn < rOut` with small enough `rOut`.
We define a coercion to function for this type, and for `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c`, the function
`⇑f` written in the extended chart at `c` has the following properties:
* `f x = 1` in the closed ball of radius `f.rIn` centered at `c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the ball of radius `f.rOut` centered at `c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The actual statements involve (pre)images under `extChartAt I f` and are given as lemmas in the
`SmoothBumpFunction` namespace.
## Tags
manifold, smooth bump function
-/
universe uE uF uH uM
variable {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H) {M : Type uM} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]
open Function Filter FiniteDimensional Set Metric
open scoped Topology Manifold Classical Filter
noncomputable section
/-!
### Smooth bump function
In this section we define a structure for a bundled smooth bump function and prove its properties.
-/
/-- Given a smooth manifold modelled on a finite dimensional space `E`,
`f : SmoothBumpFunction I M` is a smooth function on `M` such that in the extended chart `e` at
`f.c`:
* `f x = 1` in the closed ball of radius `f.rIn` centered at `f.c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the ball of radius `f.rOut` centered at `f.c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The structure contains data required to construct a function with these properties. The function is
available as `⇑f` or `f x`. Formal statements of the properties listed above involve some
(pre)images under `extChartAt I f.c` and are given as lemmas in the `SmoothBumpFunction`
namespace. -/
structure SmoothBumpFunction (c : M) extends ContDiffBump (extChartAt I c c) where
closedBall_subset : closedBall (extChartAt I c c) rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target
#align smooth_bump_function SmoothBumpFunction
namespace SmoothBumpFunction
variable {c : M} (f : SmoothBumpFunction I c) {x : M} {I}
/-- The function defined by `f : SmoothBumpFunction c`. Use automatic coercion to function
instead. -/
@[coe] def toFun : M → ℝ :=
indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c)
#align smooth_bump_function.to_fun SmoothBumpFunction.toFun
instance : CoeFun (SmoothBumpFunction I c) fun _ => M → ℝ :=
⟨toFun⟩
theorem coe_def : ⇑f = indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) :=
rfl
#align smooth_bump_function.coe_def SmoothBumpFunction.coe_def
theorem rOut_pos : 0 < f.rOut :=
f.toContDiffBump.rOut_pos
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align smooth_bump_function.R_pos SmoothBumpFunction.rOut_pos
theorem ball_subset : ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target :=
Subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closedBall) f.closedBall_subset
#align smooth_bump_function.ball_subset SmoothBumpFunction.ball_subset
theorem ball_inter_range_eq_ball_inter_target :
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I =
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ (extChartAt I c).target :=
(subset_inter inter_subset_left f.ball_subset).antisymm <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <|
extChartAt_target_subset_range _ _
theorem eqOn_source : EqOn f (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) (chartAt H c).source :=
eqOn_indicator
#align smooth_bump_function.eq_on_source SmoothBumpFunction.eqOn_source
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem_source (hx : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c :=
f.eqOn_source.eventuallyEq_of_mem <| (chartAt H c).open_source.mem_nhds hx
#align smooth_bump_function.eventually_eq_of_mem_source SmoothBumpFunction.eventuallyEq_of_mem_source
theorem one_of_dist_le (hs : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source)
(hd : dist (extChartAt I c x) (extChartAt I c c) ≤ f.rIn) : f x = 1 := by
simp only [f.eqOn_source hs, (· ∘ ·), f.one_of_mem_closedBall hd]
#align smooth_bump_function.one_of_dist_le SmoothBumpFunction.one_of_dist_le
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/BumpFunction.lean | 112 | 116 | theorem support_eq_inter_preimage :
support f = (chartAt H c).source ∩ extChartAt I c ⁻¹' ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut := by |
rw [coe_def, support_indicator, support_comp_eq_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I,
← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', ← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq',
f.support_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Computability.Language
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import computability.DFA from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Deterministic Finite Automata
This file contains the definition of a Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA), a state machine which
determines whether a string (implemented as a list over an arbitrary alphabet) is in a regular set
in linear time.
Note that this definition allows for Automaton with infinite states, a `Fintype` instance must be
supplied for true DFA's.
-/
open Computability
universe u v
-- Porting note: Required as `DFA` is used in mathlib3
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
/-- A DFA is a set of states (`σ`), a transition function from state to state labelled by the
alphabet (`step`), a starting state (`start`) and a set of acceptance states (`accept`). -/
structure DFA (α : Type u) (σ : Type v) where
/-- A transition function from state to state labelled by the alphabet. -/
step : σ → α → σ
/-- Starting state. -/
start : σ
/-- Set of acceptance states. -/
accept : Set σ
#align DFA DFA
namespace DFA
variable {α : Type u} {σ : Type v} (M : DFA α σ)
instance [Inhabited σ] : Inhabited (DFA α σ) :=
⟨DFA.mk (fun _ _ => default) default ∅⟩
/-- `M.evalFrom s x` evaluates `M` with input `x` starting from the state `s`. -/
def evalFrom (start : σ) : List α → σ :=
List.foldl M.step start
#align DFA.eval_from DFA.evalFrom
@[simp]
theorem evalFrom_nil (s : σ) : M.evalFrom s [] = s :=
rfl
#align DFA.eval_from_nil DFA.evalFrom_nil
@[simp]
theorem evalFrom_singleton (s : σ) (a : α) : M.evalFrom s [a] = M.step s a :=
rfl
#align DFA.eval_from_singleton DFA.evalFrom_singleton
@[simp]
theorem evalFrom_append_singleton (s : σ) (x : List α) (a : α) :
M.evalFrom s (x ++ [a]) = M.step (M.evalFrom s x) a := by
simp only [evalFrom, List.foldl_append, List.foldl_cons, List.foldl_nil]
#align DFA.eval_from_append_singleton DFA.evalFrom_append_singleton
/-- `M.eval x` evaluates `M` with input `x` starting from the state `M.start`. -/
def eval : List α → σ :=
M.evalFrom M.start
#align DFA.eval DFA.eval
@[simp]
theorem eval_nil : M.eval [] = M.start :=
rfl
#align DFA.eval_nil DFA.eval_nil
@[simp]
theorem eval_singleton (a : α) : M.eval [a] = M.step M.start a :=
rfl
#align DFA.eval_singleton DFA.eval_singleton
@[simp]
theorem eval_append_singleton (x : List α) (a : α) : M.eval (x ++ [a]) = M.step (M.eval x) a :=
evalFrom_append_singleton _ _ _ _
#align DFA.eval_append_singleton DFA.eval_append_singleton
theorem evalFrom_of_append (start : σ) (x y : List α) :
M.evalFrom start (x ++ y) = M.evalFrom (M.evalFrom start x) y :=
x.foldl_append _ _ y
#align DFA.eval_from_of_append DFA.evalFrom_of_append
/-- `M.accepts` is the language of `x` such that `M.eval x` is an accept state. -/
def accepts : Language α := {x | M.eval x ∈ M.accept}
#align DFA.accepts DFA.accepts
theorem mem_accepts (x : List α) : x ∈ M.accepts ↔ M.evalFrom M.start x ∈ M.accept := by rfl
#align DFA.mem_accepts DFA.mem_accepts
| Mathlib/Computability/DFA.lean | 101 | 134 | theorem evalFrom_split [Fintype σ] {x : List α} {s t : σ} (hlen : Fintype.card σ ≤ x.length)
(hx : M.evalFrom s x = t) :
∃ q a b c,
x = a ++ b ++ c ∧
a.length + b.length ≤ Fintype.card σ ∧
b ≠ [] ∧ M.evalFrom s a = q ∧ M.evalFrom q b = q ∧ M.evalFrom q c = t := by |
obtain ⟨n, m, hneq, heq⟩ :=
Fintype.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt
(fun n : Fin (Fintype.card σ + 1) => M.evalFrom s (x.take n)) (by norm_num)
wlog hle : (n : ℕ) ≤ m
· exact this _ hlen hx _ _ hneq.symm heq.symm (le_of_not_le hle)
have hm : (m : ℕ) ≤ Fintype.card σ := Fin.is_le m
refine
⟨M.evalFrom s ((x.take m).take n), (x.take m).take n, (x.take m).drop n,
x.drop m, ?_, ?_, ?_, by rfl, ?_⟩
· rw [List.take_append_drop, List.take_append_drop]
· simp only [List.length_drop, List.length_take]
rw [min_eq_left (hm.trans hlen), min_eq_left hle, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hle]
exact hm
· intro h
have hlen' := congr_arg List.length h
simp only [List.length_drop, List.length, List.length_take] at hlen'
rw [min_eq_left, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le] at hlen'
· apply hneq
apply le_antisymm
assumption'
exact hm.trans hlen
have hq : M.evalFrom (M.evalFrom s ((x.take m).take n)) ((x.take m).drop n) =
M.evalFrom s ((x.take m).take n) := by
rw [List.take_take, min_eq_left hle, ← evalFrom_of_append, heq, ← min_eq_left hle, ←
List.take_take, min_eq_left hle, List.take_append_drop]
use hq
rwa [← hq, ← evalFrom_of_append, ← evalFrom_of_append, ← List.append_assoc,
List.take_append_drop, List.take_append_drop]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
#align_import category_theory.sites.canonical from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9e7c80f638149bfb3504ba8ff48dfdbfc949fb1a"
/-!
# The canonical topology on a category
We define the finest (largest) Grothendieck topology for which a given presheaf `P` is a sheaf.
This is well defined since if `P` is a sheaf for a topology `J`, then it is a sheaf for any
coarser (smaller) topology. Nonetheless we define the topology explicitly by specifying its sieves:
A sieve `S` on `X` is covering for `finestTopologySingle P` iff
for any `f : Y ⟶ X`, `P` satisfies the sheaf axiom for `S.pullback f`.
Showing that this is a genuine Grothendieck topology (namely that it satisfies the transitivity
axiom) forms the bulk of this file.
This generalises to a set of presheaves, giving the topology `finestTopology Ps` which is the
finest topology for which every presheaf in `Ps` is a sheaf.
Using `Ps` as the set of representable presheaves defines the `canonicalTopology`: the finest
topology for which every representable is a sheaf.
A Grothendieck topology is called `Subcanonical` if it is smaller than the canonical topology,
equivalently it is subcanonical iff every representable presheaf is a sheaf.
## References
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/canonical+topology
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/subcanonical+coverage
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z9
* https://math.stackexchange.com/a/358709/
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open scoped Classical
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
namespace Sheaf
variable {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v}
variable {X Y : C} {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
variable (J J₂ : GrothendieckTopology C)
/--
To show `P` is a sheaf for the binding of `U` with `B`, it suffices to show that `P` is a sheaf for
`U`, that `P` is a sheaf for each sieve in `B`, and that it is separated for any pullback of any
sieve in `B`.
This is mostly an auxiliary lemma to show `isSheafFor_trans`.
Adapted from [Elephant], Lemma C2.1.7(i) with suggestions as mentioned in
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/358709/
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Canonical.lean | 61 | 113 | theorem isSheafFor_bind (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v) (U : Sieve X) (B : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, U f → Sieve Y)
(hU : Presieve.IsSheafFor P (U : Presieve X))
(hB : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (hf : U f), Presieve.IsSheafFor P (B hf : Presieve Y))
(hB' : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (h : U f) ⦃Z⦄ (g : Z ⟶ Y),
Presieve.IsSeparatedFor P (((B h).pullback g) : Presieve Z)) :
Presieve.IsSheafFor P (Sieve.bind (U : Presieve X) B : Presieve X) := by |
intro s hs
let y : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (hf : U f), Presieve.FamilyOfElements P (B hf : Presieve Y) :=
fun Y f hf Z g hg => s _ (Presieve.bind_comp _ _ hg)
have hy : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (hf : U f), (y hf).Compatible := by
intro Y f H Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
apply hs
apply reassoc_of% comm
let t : Presieve.FamilyOfElements P (U : Presieve X) :=
fun Y f hf => (hB hf).amalgamate (y hf) (hy hf)
have ht : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (hf : U f), (y hf).IsAmalgamation (t f hf) := fun Y f hf =>
(hB hf).isAmalgamation _
have hT : t.Compatible := by
rw [Presieve.compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
intro Z W f h hf
apply (hB (U.downward_closed hf h)).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro Y l hl
apply (hB' hf (l ≫ h)).ext
intro M m hm
have : bind U B (m ≫ l ≫ h ≫ f) := by
-- Porting note: had to make explicit the parameter `((m ≫ l ≫ h) ≫ f)` and
-- using `by exact`
have : bind U B ((m ≫ l ≫ h) ≫ f) := by exact Presieve.bind_comp f hf hm
simpa using this
trans s (m ≫ l ≫ h ≫ f) this
· have := ht (U.downward_closed hf h) _ ((B _).downward_closed hl m)
rw [op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply] at this
rw [this]
change s _ _ = s _ _
-- Porting note: the proof was `by simp`
congr 1
simp only [assoc]
· have h : s _ _ = _ := (ht hf _ hm).symm
-- Porting note: this was done by `simp only [assoc] at`
conv_lhs at h => congr; rw [assoc, assoc]
rw [h]
simp only [op_comp, assoc, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
refine ⟨hU.amalgamate t hT, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro Z _ ⟨Y, f, g, hg, hf, rfl⟩
rw [op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue _ _ _ hg]
apply ht hg _ hf
· intro y hy
apply hU.isSeparatedFor.ext
intro Y f hf
apply (hB hf).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro Z g hg
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, hy _ (Presieve.bind_comp _ _ hg),
hU.valid_glue _ _ hf, ht hf _ hg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Filter
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Measure
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Bool.Lemmas
#align_import analysis.box_integral.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Integrals of Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane
In this file we define the integral of a function over a box in `ℝⁿ`. The same definition works for
Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane integrals.
As usual, we represent `ℝⁿ` as the type of functions `ι → ℝ` for some finite type `ι`. A rectangular
box `(l, u]` in `ℝⁿ` is defined to be the set `{x : ι → ℝ | ∀ i, l i < x i ∧ x i ≤ u i}`, see
`BoxIntegral.Box`.
Let `vol` be a box-additive function on boxes in `ℝⁿ` with codomain `E →L[ℝ] F`. Given a function
`f : ℝⁿ → E`, a box `I` and a tagged partition `π` of this box, the *integral sum* of `f` over `π`
with respect to the volume `vol` is the sum of `vol J (f (π.tag J))` over all boxes of `π`. Here
`π.tag J` is the point (tag) in `ℝⁿ` associated with the box `J`.
The integral is defined as the limit of integral sums along a filter. Different filters correspond
to different integration theories. In order to avoid code duplication, all our definitions and
theorems take an argument `l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams`. This is a type that holds three
boolean values, and encodes eight filters including those corresponding to Riemann,
Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane integrals.
Following the design of infinite sums (see `hasSum` and `tsum`), we define a predicate
`BoxIntegral.HasIntegral` and a function `BoxIntegral.integral` that returns a vector satisfying
the predicate or zero if the function is not integrable.
Then we prove some basic properties of box integrals (linearity, a formula for the integral of a
constant). We also prove a version of the Henstock-Sacks inequality (see
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_le_of_memBaseSet` and
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet_of_iUnion_eq`), prove
integrability of continuous functions, and provide a criterion for integrability w.r.t. a
non-Riemann filter (e.g., Henstock-Kurzweil and McShane).
## Notation
- `ℝⁿ`: local notation for `ι → ℝ`
## Tags
integral
-/
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal Filter Uniformity BoxIntegral
open Set Finset Function Filter Metric BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type u} {E : Type v} {F : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {I J : Box ι} {π : TaggedPrepartition I}
open TaggedPrepartition
local notation "ℝⁿ" => ι → ℝ
/-!
### Integral sum and its basic properties
-/
/-- The integral sum of `f : ℝⁿ → E` over a tagged prepartition `π` w.r.t. box-additive volume `vol`
with codomain `E →L[ℝ] F` is the sum of `vol J (f (π.tag J))` over all boxes of `π`. -/
def integralSum (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) : F :=
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, vol J (f (π.tag J))
#align box_integral.integral_sum BoxIntegral.integralSum
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Basic.lean | 83 | 87 | theorem integralSum_biUnionTagged (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, TaggedPrepartition J) :
integralSum f vol (π.biUnionTagged πi) = ∑ J ∈ π.boxes, integralSum f vol (πi J) := by |
refine (π.sum_biUnion_boxes _ _).trans <| sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => sum_congr rfl fun J' hJ' => ?_
rw [π.tag_biUnionTagged hJ hJ']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Filtered
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DiscreteCategory
#align_import category_theory.limits.opposites from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ac3ae212f394f508df43e37aa093722fa9b65d31"
/-!
# Limits in `C` give colimits in `Cᵒᵖ`.
We also give special cases for (co)products,
(co)equalizers, and pullbacks / pushouts.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {J : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} J]
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cocone_op CategoryTheory.Limits.IsColimit.op
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_op CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.op
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.IsColimit.unop
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.unop
-- 2024-03-26
@[deprecated] alias isLimitCoconeOp := IsColimit.op
@[deprecated] alias isColimitConeOp := IsLimit.op
@[deprecated] alias isLimitCoconeUnop := IsColimit.unop
@[deprecated] alias isColimitConeUnop := IsLimit.unop
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeLeftOpOfCocone (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneLeftOpOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeLeftOp s)).unop
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| by
simp only [coneLeftOpOfCocone_π_app, op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac,
coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app, op_unop]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac, coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_left_op_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeLeftOpOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit of `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a colimit of `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeLeftOpOfCone (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeLeftOpOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeLeftOp s)).unop
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| by
simp only [coconeLeftOpOfCone_ι_app, op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac,
coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app, op_unop]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac, coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_left_op_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeLeftOpOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a limit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeRightOpOfCocone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneRightOpOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeRightOp s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_right_op_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeRightOpOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a colimit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeRightOpOfCone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeRightOpOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeRightOp s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_right_op_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeRightOpOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeUnopOfCocone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneUnopOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeUnop s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_unop_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeUnopOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit of `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a colimit of `F.unop : J ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeUnopOfCone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeUnopOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeUnop s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_unop_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeUnopOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a limit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F.leftOp} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeLeftOp c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeLeftOpOfCone s)).op
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by
simp only [coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app, unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac,
coconeLeftOpOfCone_ι_app, unop_op]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac, coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp
/-- Turn a limit of `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a colimit of `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F.leftOp} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeLeftOp c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneLeftOpOfCocone s)).op
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by
simp only [coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app, unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac,
coneLeftOpOfCocone_π_app, unop_op]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac, coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_of_cone_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeRightOp (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cocone F.rightOp} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeRightOp c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeRightOpOfCone s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_right_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeRightOp
/-- Turn a limit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeOfConeRightOp (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cone F.rightOp} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeRightOp c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneRightOpOfCocone s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_of_cone_right_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeOfConeRightOp
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeUnop (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F.unop} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeUnop c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeUnopOfCone s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeUnop
/-- Turn a limit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C` into a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitConeOfCoconeUnop (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F.unop} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeUnop c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneUnopOfCocone s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_of_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitConeOfCoconeUnop
/-- If `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` has a colimit, we can construct a limit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
theorem hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) [HasColimit F.leftOp] : HasLimit F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := coneOfCoconeLeftOp (colimit.cocone F.leftOp)
isLimit := isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp _ (colimit.isColimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_colimit_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp
theorem hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F.op] : HasLimit F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (colimit.cocone F.op).unop
isLimit := (colimit.isColimit _).unop }
theorem hasLimit_op_of_hasColimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : HasLimit F.op :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (colimit.cocone F).op
isLimit := (colimit.isColimit _).op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_colimit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op
/-- If `C` has colimits of shape `Jᵒᵖ`, we can construct limits in `Cᵒᵖ` of shape `J`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape [HasColimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C] :
HasLimitsOfShape J Cᵒᵖ :=
{ has_limit := fun F => hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_op_of_has_colimits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op [HasColimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ] :
HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
{ has_limit := fun F => hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_of_has_colimits_of_shape_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op
attribute [local instance] hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
/-- If `C` has colimits, we can construct limits for `Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
instance hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits [HasColimits C] : HasLimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_op_of_has_colimits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits
theorem hasLimits_of_hasColimits_op [HasColimits Cᵒᵖ] : HasLimits C :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := fun _ _ => hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_has_colimits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimits_of_hasColimits_op
instance has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits [HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C] :
HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ where
HasLimitsOfShape _ _ _ := hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
#align category_theory.limits.has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits CategoryTheory.Limits.has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits
theorem has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op [HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ] :
HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C :=
{ HasLimitsOfShape := fun _ _ _ => hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op
/-- If `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` has a limit, we can construct a colimit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
theorem hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) [HasLimit F.leftOp] : HasColimit F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := coconeOfConeLeftOp (limit.cone F.leftOp)
isColimit := isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp _ (limit.isLimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit_of_has_limit_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp
theorem hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F.op] : HasColimit F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (limit.cone F.op).unop
isColimit := (limit.isLimit _).unop }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit_of_has_limit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op
theorem hasColimit_op_of_hasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : HasColimit F.op :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (limit.cone F).op
isColimit := (limit.isLimit _).op }
/-- If `C` has colimits of shape `Jᵒᵖ`, we can construct limits in `Cᵒᵖ` of shape `J`.
-/
instance hasColimitsOfShape_op_of_hasLimitsOfShape [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C] :
HasColimitsOfShape J Cᵒᵖ where has_colimit F := hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp F
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_shape_op_of_has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitsOfShape_op_of_hasLimitsOfShape
theorem hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ] :
HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
{ has_colimit := fun F => hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_shape_of_has_limits_of_shape_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op
/-- If `C` has limits, we can construct colimits for `Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
instance hasColimits_op_of_hasLimits [HasLimits C] : HasColimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_op_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimits_op_of_hasLimits
theorem hasColimits_of_hasLimits_op [HasLimits Cᵒᵖ] : HasColimits C :=
{ has_colimits_of_shape := fun _ _ => hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_has_limits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimits_of_hasLimits_op
instance has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits [HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C] :
HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ where HasColimitsOfShape _ _ _ := inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits
theorem has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op [HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ] :
HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C :=
{ HasColimitsOfShape := fun _ _ _ => hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op
variable (X : Type v₂)
/-- If `C` has products indexed by `X`, then `Cᵒᵖ` has coproducts indexed by `X`.
-/
instance hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite [HasProductsOfShape X C] : HasCoproductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_shape_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite
theorem hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite [HasProductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ] : HasCoproductsOfShape X C :=
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_shape_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite
/-- If `C` has coproducts indexed by `X`, then `Cᵒᵖ` has products indexed by `X`.
-/
instance hasProductsOfShape_opposite [HasCoproductsOfShape X C] : HasProductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_shape_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProductsOfShape_opposite
theorem hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite [HasCoproductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ] : HasProductsOfShape X C :=
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_shape_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite
instance hasProducts_opposite [HasCoproducts.{v₂} C] : HasProducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ := fun _ =>
inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProducts_opposite
theorem hasProducts_of_opposite [HasCoproducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ] : HasProducts.{v₂} C := fun X =>
hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite X
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProducts_of_opposite
instance hasCoproducts_opposite [HasProducts.{v₂} C] : HasCoproducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ := fun _ =>
inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproducts_opposite
theorem hasCoproducts_of_opposite [HasProducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ] : HasCoproducts.{v₂} C := fun X =>
hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite X
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproducts_of_opposite
instance hasFiniteCoproducts_opposite [HasFiniteProducts C] : HasFiniteCoproducts Cᵒᵖ where
out _ := Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite _
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_coproducts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteCoproducts_opposite
theorem hasFiniteCoproducts_of_opposite [HasFiniteProducts Cᵒᵖ] : HasFiniteCoproducts C :=
{ out := fun _ => hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite _ }
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_coproducts_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteCoproducts_of_opposite
instance hasFiniteProducts_opposite [HasFiniteCoproducts C] : HasFiniteProducts Cᵒᵖ where
out _ := inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_products_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteProducts_opposite
theorem hasFiniteProducts_of_opposite [HasFiniteCoproducts Cᵒᵖ] : HasFiniteProducts C :=
{ out := fun _ => hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite _ }
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_products_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteProducts_of_opposite
section OppositeCoproducts
variable {α : Type*} {Z : α → C} [HasCoproduct Z]
instance : HasLimit (Discrete.functor Z).op := hasLimit_op_of_hasColimit (Discrete.functor Z)
instance : HasLimit ((Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op) :=
hasLimitEquivalenceComp (Discrete.opposite α).symm
instance : HasProduct (op <| Z ·) := hasLimitOfIso
((Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ by rfl)) :
(Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op ≅
Discrete.functor (op <| Z ·))
/-- A `Cofan` gives a `Fan` in the opposite category. -/
@[simp]
def Cofan.op (c : Cofan Z) : Fan (op <| Z ·) := Fan.mk _ (fun a ↦ (c.inj a).op)
/-- If a `Cofan` is colimit, then its opposite is limit. -/
def Cofan.IsColimit.op {c : Cofan Z} (hc : IsColimit c) : IsLimit c.op := by
let e : Discrete.functor (Opposite.op <| Z ·) ≅ (Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙
(Discrete.functor Z).op := Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
refine IsLimit.ofIsoLimit ((IsLimit.postcomposeInvEquiv e _).2
(IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.op (Discrete.opposite α).symm))
(Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ ?_))
dsimp
erw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
rfl
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of an abstract coproduct to the corresponding product
in the opposite category.
-/
def opCoproductIsoProduct' {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) : op c.pt ≅ f.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (Cofan.IsColimit.op hc) hf
variable (Z) in
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of the coproduct to the product in the opposite
category.
-/
def opCoproductIsoProduct :
op (∐ Z) ≅ ∏ᶜ (op <| Z ·) :=
opCoproductIsoProduct' (coproductIsCoproduct Z) (productIsProduct (op <| Z ·))
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) (b : α) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).inv ≫ (c.inj b).op = f.proj b :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp (Cofan.IsColimit.op hc) hf ⟨b⟩
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct'_comp_self {c c' : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc' : IsColimit c') (hf : IsLimit f) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).hom ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct' hc' hf).inv =
(hc.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc').op.inv := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
apply hc'.hom_ext
intro ⟨j⟩
change c'.inj _ ≫ _ = _
simp only [unop_op, unop_comp, Discrete.functor_obj, const_obj_obj, Iso.op_inv,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv]
apply Quiver.Hom.op_inj
simp only [op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, Category.assoc,
opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj]
rw [← opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj hc hf]
simp only [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
rfl
variable (Z) in
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct_inv_comp_ι (b : α) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct Z).inv ≫ (Sigma.ι Z b).op = Pi.π (op <| Z ·) b :=
opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj _ _ b
theorem desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct'_hom {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) (c' : Cofan Z) :
(hc.desc c').op ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).hom = hf.lift c'.op := by
refine (Iso.eq_comp_inv _).mp (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext (fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)))
simp only [unop_op, Discrete.functor_obj, const_obj_obj, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac,
Cofan.op, unop_comp, op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, Category.assoc]
erw [opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj, IsLimit.fac]
rfl
theorem desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct_hom {X : C} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) :
(Sigma.desc π).op ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct Z).hom = Pi.lift (fun a ↦ (π a).op) := by
convert desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct'_hom (coproductIsCoproduct Z)
(productIsProduct (op <| Z ·)) (Cofan.mk _ π)
· ext; simp [Sigma.desc, coproductIsCoproduct]
· ext; simp [Pi.lift, productIsProduct]
end OppositeCoproducts
section OppositeProducts
variable {α : Type*} {Z : α → C} [HasProduct Z]
instance : HasColimit (Discrete.functor Z).op := hasColimit_op_of_hasLimit (Discrete.functor Z)
instance : HasColimit ((Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op) :=
hasColimit_equivalence_comp (Discrete.opposite α).symm
instance : HasCoproduct (op <| Z ·) := hasColimitOfIso
((Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ by rfl)) :
(Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op ≅
Discrete.functor (op <| Z ·)).symm
/-- A `Fan` gives a `Cofan` in the opposite category. -/
@[simp]
def Fan.op (f : Fan Z) : Cofan (op <| Z ·) := Cofan.mk _ (fun a ↦ (f.proj a).op)
/-- If a `Fan` is limit, then its opposite is colimit. -/
def Fan.IsLimit.op {f : Fan Z} (hf : IsLimit f) : IsColimit f.op := by
let e : Discrete.functor (Opposite.op <| Z ·) ≅ (Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙
(Discrete.functor Z).op := Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
refine IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ((IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv e _).2
(IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hf.op (Discrete.opposite α).symm))
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ ?_))
dsimp
erw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
rfl
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of an abstract product to the corresponding coproduct
in the opposite category.
-/
def opProductIsoCoproduct' {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) : op f.pt ≅ c.pt :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (Fan.IsLimit.op hf) hc
variable (Z) in
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of the product to the coproduct in the opposite
category.
-/
def opProductIsoCoproduct :
op (∏ᶜ Z) ≅ ∐ (op <| Z ·) :=
opProductIsoCoproduct' (productIsProduct Z) (coproductIsCoproduct (op <| Z ·))
theorem proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) (b : α) :
(f.proj b).op ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).hom = c.inj b :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (Fan.IsLimit.op hf) hc ⟨b⟩
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct'_comp_self {f f' : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hf' : IsLimit f') (hc : IsColimit c) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).hom ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct' hf' hc).inv =
(hf.conePointUniqueUpToIso hf').op.inv := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
apply hf.hom_ext
intro ⟨j⟩
change _ ≫ f.proj _ = _
simp only [unop_op, unop_comp, Category.assoc, Discrete.functor_obj, Iso.op_inv,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp]
apply Quiver.Hom.op_inj
simp only [op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom]
rw [← proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom hf' hc]
simp only [Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
rfl
variable (Z) in
theorem π_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct_hom (b : α) :
(Pi.π Z b).op ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct Z).hom = Sigma.ι (op <| Z ·) b :=
proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom _ _ b
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct'_inv_comp_lift {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) (f' : Fan Z) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).inv ≫ (hf.lift f').op = hc.desc f'.op := by
refine (Iso.inv_comp_eq _).mpr (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hf.hom_ext (fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)))
simp only [Discrete.functor_obj, unop_op, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac, Fan.op, unop_comp,
Category.assoc, op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop]
erw [← Category.assoc, proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom, IsColimit.fac]
rfl
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct_inv_comp_lift {X : C} (π : (a : α) → X ⟶ Z a) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct Z).inv ≫ (Pi.lift π).op = Sigma.desc (fun a ↦ (π a).op) := by
convert opProductIsoCoproduct'_inv_comp_lift (productIsProduct Z)
(coproductIsCoproduct (op <| Z ·)) (Fan.mk _ π)
· ext; simp [Pi.lift, productIsProduct]
· ext; simp [Sigma.desc, coproductIsCoproduct]
end OppositeProducts
instance hasEqualizers_opposite [HasCoequalizers C] : HasEqualizers Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingParallelPairOpEquiv
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_equalizers_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasEqualizers_opposite
instance hasCoequalizers_opposite [HasEqualizers C] : HasCoequalizers Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingParallelPairOpEquiv
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coequalizers_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoequalizers_opposite
instance hasFiniteColimits_opposite [HasFiniteLimits C] : HasFiniteColimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_colimits_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteColimits_opposite
instance hasFiniteLimits_opposite [HasFiniteColimits C] : HasFiniteLimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_limits_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteLimits_opposite
instance hasPullbacks_opposite [HasPushouts C] : HasPullbacks Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape WalkingCospanᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingCospanOpEquiv.symm
apply hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullbacks_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullbacks_opposite
instance hasPushouts_opposite [HasPullbacks C] : HasPushouts Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape WalkingSpanᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingSpanOpEquiv.symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushouts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushouts_opposite
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `Span f.op g.op` and `(Cospan f g).op` -/
@[simps!]
def spanOp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
span f.op g.op ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> rfl)
(by rintro (_ | _ | _) (_ | _ | _) f <;> cases f <;> aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.span_op CategoryTheory.Limits.spanOp
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `(Cospan f g).op` and `Span f.op g.op` -/
@[simps!]
def opCospan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).op ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ span f.op g.op :=
calc
(cospan f g).op ≅ 𝟭 _ ⋙ (cospan f g).op := by rfl
_ ≅ (walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse) ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
(isoWhiskerRight walkingCospanOpEquiv.unitIso _)
_ ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _)
_ ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ span f.op g.op := isoWhiskerLeft _ (spanOp f g).symm
#align category_theory.limits.op_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.opCospan
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `Cospan f.op g.op` and `(Span f g).op` -/
@[simps!]
def cospanOp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
cospan f.op g.op ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (span f g).op :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> rfl)
(by rintro (_ | _ | _) (_ | _ | _) f <;> cases f <;> aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_op CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanOp
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `(Span f g).op` and `Cospan f.op g.op` -/
@[simps!]
def opSpan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
(span f g).op ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ cospan f.op g.op :=
calc
(span f g).op ≅ 𝟭 _ ⋙ (span f g).op := by rfl
_ ≅ (walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse) ⋙ (span f g).op :=
(isoWhiskerRight walkingSpanOpEquiv.unitIso _)
_ ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (span f g).op :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _)
_ ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ cospan f.op g.op := isoWhiskerLeft _ (cospanOp f g).symm
#align category_theory.limits.op_span CategoryTheory.Limits.opSpan
namespace PushoutCocone
-- Porting note: it was originally @[simps (config := lemmasOnly)]
/-- The obvious map `PushoutCocone f g → PullbackCone f.unop g.unop` -/
@[simps!]
def unop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
PullbackCone f.unop g.unop :=
Cocone.unop
((Cocones.precompose (opCospan f.unop g.unop).hom).obj
(Cocone.whisker walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor c))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_fst {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.unop.fst = c.inl.unop := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_snd {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.unop.snd = c.inr.unop := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop_snd
-- Porting note: it was originally @[simps (config := lemmasOnly)]
/-- The obvious map `PushoutCocone f.op g.op → PullbackCone f g` -/
@[simps!]
def op {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) : PullbackCone f.op g.op :=
(Cones.postcompose (cospanOp f g).symm.hom).obj
(Cone.whisker walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse (Cocone.op c))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.op
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_fst {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.op.fst = c.inl.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.op_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_snd {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.op.snd = c.inr.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.op_snd
end PushoutCocone
namespace PullbackCone
-- Porting note: it was originally @[simps (config := lemmasOnly)]
/-- The obvious map `PullbackCone f g → PushoutCocone f.unop g.unop` -/
@[simps!]
def unop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
PushoutCocone f.unop g.unop :=
Cone.unop
((Cones.postcompose (opSpan f.unop g.unop).symm.hom).obj
(Cone.whisker walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor c))
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.unop
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_inl {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
c.unop.inl = c.fst.unop := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.unop_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.unop_inl
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_inr {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
c.unop.inr = c.snd.unop := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.unop_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.unop_inr
/-- The obvious map `PullbackCone f g → PushoutCocone f.op g.op` -/
@[simps!]
def op {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) : PushoutCocone f.op g.op :=
(Cocones.precompose (spanOp f g).hom).obj
(Cocone.whisker walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse (Cone.op c))
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.op CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.op
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_inl {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
c.op.inl = c.fst.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.op_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.op_inl
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_inr {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
c.op.inr = c.snd.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.op_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.op_inr
/-- If `c` is a pullback cone, then `c.op.unop` is isomorphic to `c`. -/
def opUnop {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.op.unop ≅ c :=
PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.op_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.opUnop
/-- If `c` is a pullback cone in `Cᵒᵖ`, then `c.unop.op` is isomorphic to `c`. -/
def unopOp {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.unop.op ≅ c :=
PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.unop_op CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.unopOp
end PullbackCone
namespace PushoutCocone
/-- If `c` is a pushout cocone, then `c.op.unop` is isomorphic to `c`. -/
def opUnop {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.op.unop ≅ c :=
PushoutCocone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.opUnop
/-- If `c` is a pushout cocone in `Cᵒᵖ`, then `c.unop.op` is isomorphic to `c`. -/
def unopOp {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.unop.op ≅ c :=
PushoutCocone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop_op CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unopOp
/-- A pushout cone is a colimit cocone if and only if the corresponding pullback cone
in the opposite category is a limit cone. -/
def isColimitEquivIsLimitOp {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
IsColimit c ≃ IsLimit c.op := by
apply equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton
· intro h
exact (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).invFun
((IsLimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv walkingSpanOpEquiv.symm).toFun h.op)
· intro h
exact (IsColimit.equivIsoColimit c.opUnop).toFun
(((IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).invFun
((IsLimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv _).toFun h)).unop)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_equiv_is_limit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitEquivIsLimitOp
/-- A pushout cone is a colimit cocone in `Cᵒᵖ` if and only if the corresponding pullback cone
in `C` is a limit cone. -/
def isColimitEquivIsLimitUnop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
IsColimit c ≃ IsLimit c.unop := by
apply equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton
· intro h
exact ((IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).invFun
((IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv _).toFun h)).unop
· intro h
exact (IsColimit.equivIsoColimit c.unopOp).toFun
((IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).invFun
((IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv walkingCospanOpEquiv.symm).toFun h.op))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_equiv_is_limit_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitEquivIsLimitUnop
end PushoutCocone
namespace PullbackCone
/-- A pullback cone is a limit cone if and only if the corresponding pushout cocone
in the opposite category is a colimit cocone. -/
def isLimitEquivIsColimitOp {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
IsLimit c ≃ IsColimit c.op :=
(IsLimit.equivIsoLimit c.opUnop).symm.trans c.op.isColimitEquivIsLimitUnop.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_equiv_is_colimit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitEquivIsColimitOp
/-- A pullback cone is a limit cone in `Cᵒᵖ` if and only if the corresponding pushout cocone
in `C` is a colimit cocone. -/
def isLimitEquivIsColimitUnop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) :
IsLimit c ≃ IsColimit c.unop :=
(IsLimit.equivIsoLimit c.unopOp).symm.trans c.unop.isColimitEquivIsLimitOp.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_equiv_is_colimit_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitEquivIsColimitUnop
end PullbackCone
section Pullback
open Opposite
/-- The pullback of `f` and `g` in `C` is isomorphic to the pushout of
`f.op` and `g.op` in `Cᵒᵖ`. -/
noncomputable def pullbackIsoUnopPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [h : HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] : pullback f g ≅ unop (pushout f.op g.op) :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (@limit.isLimit _ _ _ _ _ h)
((PushoutCocone.isColimitEquivIsLimitUnop _) (colimit.isColimit (span f.op g.op)))
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_fst {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] :
(pullbackIsoUnopPushout f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst = (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f.op g.op).unop :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _).trans (by simp [unop_id (X := { unop := X })])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_snd {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] :
(pullbackIsoUnopPushout f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd = (pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f.op g.op).unop :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _).trans (by simp [unop_id (X := { unop := Y })])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout_inv_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoUnopPushout_hom_inl {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] :
pushout.inl ≫ (pullbackIsoUnopPushout f g).hom.op = pullback.fst.op := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
dsimp
rw [← pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_fst, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_iso_unop_pushout_hom_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsoUnopPushout_hom_inl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Opposites.lean | 800 | 805 | theorem pullbackIsoUnopPushout_hom_inr {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPushout f.op g.op] : pushout.inr ≫ (pullbackIsoUnopPushout f g).hom.op =
pullback.snd.op := by |
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
dsimp
rw [← pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_snd, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.Order.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8ea5598db6caeddde6cb734aa179cc2408dbd345"
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r o h`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.lift.initialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.lift.principalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. This definition is universe polymorphic:
`Ordinal.omega.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in a specific
universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module
assert_not_exists Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Well order on an arbitrary type -/
section WellOrderingThm
-- Porting note: `parameter` does not work
-- parameter {σ : Type u}
variable {σ : Type u}
open Function
theorem nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal : Nonempty (σ ↪ Cardinal.{u}) :=
(Embedding.total _ _).resolve_left fun ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ =>
let g : σ → Cardinal.{u} := invFun f
let ⟨x, (hx : g x = 2 ^ sum g)⟩ := invFun_surjective hf (2 ^ sum g)
have : g x ≤ sum g := le_sum.{u, u} g x
not_le_of_gt (by rw [hx]; exact cantor _) this
#align nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal
/-- An embedding of any type to the set of cardinals. -/
def embeddingToCardinal : σ ↪ Cardinal.{u} :=
Classical.choice nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal
#align embedding_to_cardinal embeddingToCardinal
/-- Any type can be endowed with a well order, obtained by pulling back the well order over
cardinals by some embedding. -/
def WellOrderingRel : σ → σ → Prop :=
embeddingToCardinal ⁻¹'o (· < ·)
#align well_ordering_rel WellOrderingRel
instance WellOrderingRel.isWellOrder : IsWellOrder σ WellOrderingRel :=
(RelEmbedding.preimage _ _).isWellOrder
#align well_ordering_rel.is_well_order WellOrderingRel.isWellOrder
instance IsWellOrder.subtype_nonempty : Nonempty { r // IsWellOrder σ r } :=
⟨⟨WellOrderingRel, inferInstance⟩⟩
#align is_well_order.subtype_nonempty IsWellOrder.subtype_nonempty
end WellOrderingThm
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Well_order WellOrder
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (o : WellOrder) : mk o.α o.r o.wo = o := by
cases o
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Well_order.eta WellOrder.eta
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_equivalent Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
#align ordinal Ordinal
instance hasWellFoundedOut (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.out.α :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
#align has_well_founded_out hasWellFoundedOut
instance linearOrderOut (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.out.α :=
IsWellOrder.linearOrder o.out.r
#align linear_order_out linearOrderOut
instance isWellOrder_out_lt (o : Ordinal) : IsWellOrder o.out.α (· < ·) :=
o.out.wo
#align is_well_order_out_lt isWellOrder_out_lt
namespace Ordinal
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
#align ordinal.type Ordinal.type
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order. For the embedding as a principal segment, see
`typein.principalSeg`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : Ordinal :=
type (Subrel r { b | r b a })
#align ordinal.typein Ordinal.typein
@[simp]
theorem type_def' (w : WellOrder) : ⟦w⟧ = type w.r := by
cases w
rfl
#align ordinal.type_def' Ordinal.type_def'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem type_def (r) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : (⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧ : Ordinal) = type r := by
rfl
#align ordinal.type_def Ordinal.type_def
@[simp]
theorem type_out (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal.type o.out.r = o := by
rw [Ordinal.type, WellOrder.eta, Quotient.out_eq]
#align ordinal.type_out Ordinal.type_out
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
#align ordinal.type_eq Ordinal.type_eq
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
#align rel_iso.ordinal_type_eq RelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lt (o : Ordinal) : type ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop) = o :=
(type_def' _).symm.trans <| Quotient.out_eq o
#align ordinal.type_lt Ordinal.type_lt
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_eq_zero_of_empty Ordinal.type_eq_zero_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
#align ordinal.type_eq_zero_iff_is_empty Ordinal.type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
#align ordinal.type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty Ordinal.type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
#align ordinal.type_ne_zero_of_nonempty Ordinal.type_ne_zero_of_nonempty
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_pempty Ordinal.type_pEmpty
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
#align ordinal.type_empty Ordinal.type_empty
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Unique α] : type r = 1 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_eq_one_of_unique Ordinal.type_eq_one_of_unique
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => @type_eq_one_of_unique α r _ h⟩
#align ordinal.type_eq_one_iff_unique Ordinal.type_eq_one_iff_unique
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_punit Ordinal.type_pUnit
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_unit Ordinal.type_unit
@[simp]
theorem out_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.out.α ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.out.α (· < ·), type_lt]
#align ordinal.out_empty_iff_eq_zero Ordinal.out_empty_iff_eq_zero
theorem eq_zero_of_out_empty (o : Ordinal) [h : IsEmpty o.out.α] : o = 0 :=
out_empty_iff_eq_zero.1 h
#align ordinal.eq_zero_of_out_empty Ordinal.eq_zero_of_out_empty
instance isEmpty_out_zero : IsEmpty (0 : Ordinal).out.α :=
out_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
#align ordinal.is_empty_out_zero Ordinal.isEmpty_out_zero
@[simp]
theorem out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.out.α ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.out.α (· < ·), type_lt]
#align ordinal.out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero Ordinal.out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_out_nonempty (o : Ordinal) [h : Nonempty o.out.α] : o ≠ 0 :=
out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.1 h
#align ordinal.ne_zero_of_out_nonempty Ordinal.ne_zero_of_out_nonempty
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
#align ordinal.one_ne_zero Ordinal.one_ne_zero
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
--@[simp] -- Porting note: not in simp nf, added aux lemma below
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_preimage Ordinal.type_preimage
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- `simpNF` incorrectly complains the LHS doesn't simplify.
theorem type_preimage_aux {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
@type _ (fun x y => r (f x) (f y)) (inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder β (↑f ⁻¹'o r))) = type r := by
convert (RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
#align ordinal.induction_on Ordinal.inductionOn
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨(InitialSeg.ofIso f.symm).trans <| h.trans (InitialSeg.ofIso g)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨(InitialSeg.ofIso f).trans <| h.trans (InitialSeg.ofIso g.symm)⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.equivLT f.symm <| h.ltLe (InitialSeg.ofIso g)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨PrincipalSeg.equivLT f <| h.ltLe (InitialSeg.ofIso g.symm)⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.ltLe g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
Sum.recOn f.ltOrEq (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨InitialSeg.ofIso g.symm⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.type_le_iff Ordinal.type_le_iff
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
#align ordinal.type_le_iff' Ordinal.type_le_iff'
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
#align initial_seg.ordinal_type_le InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
#align rel_embedding.ordinal_type_le RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le
@[simp]
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.type_lt_iff Ordinal.type_lt_iff
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
#align principal_seg.ordinal_type_lt PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
#align ordinal.zero_le Ordinal.zero_le
instance orderBot : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.bot_eq_zero Ordinal.bot_eq_zero
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
#align ordinal.le_zero Ordinal.le_zero
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
#align ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
#align ordinal.not_lt_zero Ordinal.not_lt_zero
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
#align ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos
instance zeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance NeZero.one : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
#align ordinal.ne_zero.one Ordinal.NeZero.one
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegOut α β` is the initial segment embedding
of `α` to `β`, as map from a model type for `α` to a model type for `β`. -/
def initialSegOut {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) :
InitialSeg ((· < ·) : α.out.α → α.out.α → Prop) ((· < ·) : β.out.α → β.out.α → Prop) := by
change α.out.r ≼i β.out.r
rw [← Quotient.out_eq α, ← Quotient.out_eq β] at h; revert h
cases Quotient.out α; cases Quotient.out β; exact Classical.choice
#align ordinal.initial_seg_out Ordinal.initialSegOut
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegOut α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α` to `β`, as map from a model type for `α` to a model type for `β`. -/
def principalSegOut {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) :
PrincipalSeg ((· < ·) : α.out.α → α.out.α → Prop) ((· < ·) : β.out.α → β.out.α → Prop) := by
change α.out.r ≺i β.out.r
rw [← Quotient.out_eq α, ← Quotient.out_eq β] at h; revert h
cases Quotient.out α; cases Quotient.out β; exact Classical.choice
#align ordinal.principal_seg_out Ordinal.principalSegOut
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
⟨PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _⟩
#align ordinal.typein_lt_type Ordinal.typein_lt_type
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.out.α) :
@typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_lt o]
apply typein_lt_type
#align ordinal.typein_lt_self Ordinal.typein_lt_self
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
Eq.symm <|
Quot.sound
⟨RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.codRestrict _ f f.lt_top) fun ⟨a, h⟩ => by
rcases f.down.1 h with ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨b, rfl⟩⟩
#align ordinal.typein_top Ordinal.typein_top
@[simp]
theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : Ordinal.typein s (f a) = Ordinal.typein r a :=
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨RelIso.ofSurjective
(RelEmbedding.codRestrict _ ((Subrel.relEmbedding _ _).trans f) fun ⟨x, h⟩ => by
rw [RelEmbedding.trans_apply]; exact f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h)
fun ⟨y, h⟩ => by
rcases f.init h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨a, f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.1 h⟩,
Subtype.eq <| RelEmbedding.trans_apply _ _ _⟩⟩
#align ordinal.typein_apply Ordinal.typein_apply
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => by
have : f.top.1 = a := by
let f' := PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a
let g' := f.trans (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r b)
have : g'.top = f'.top := by rw [Subsingleton.elim f' g']
exact this
rw [← this]
exact f.top.2, fun h =>
⟨PrincipalSeg.codRestrict _ (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a) (fun x => @trans _ r _ _ _ _ x.2 h) h⟩⟩
#align ordinal.typein_lt_typein Ordinal.typein_lt_typein
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
∃ a, typein r a = o :=
inductionOn o (fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.top, typein_top _⟩) h
#align ordinal.typein_surj Ordinal.typein_surj
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
injective_of_increasing r (· < ·) (typein r) (typein_lt_typein r).2
#align ordinal.typein_injective Ordinal.typein_injective
@[simp]
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
#align ordinal.typein_inj Ordinal.typein_inj
/-- Principal segment version of the `typein` function, embedding a well order into
ordinals as a principal segment. -/
def typein.principalSeg {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
@PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) :=
⟨⟨⟨typein r, typein_injective r⟩, typein_lt_typein r⟩, type r,
fun _ ↦ ⟨typein_surj r, fun ⟨a, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ typein_lt_type r a⟩⟩
#align ordinal.typein.principal_seg Ordinal.typein.principalSeg
@[simp]
theorem typein.principalSeg_coe (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
(typein.principalSeg r : α → Ordinal) = typein r :=
rfl
#align ordinal.typein.principal_seg_coe Ordinal.typein.principalSeg_coe
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals. -/
/-- `enum r o h` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those
less than the order type of `r`, to the elements of `α`. -/
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (o) (h : o < type r) : α :=
(typein.principalSeg r).subrelIso ⟨o, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
typein r (enum r o h) = o :=
(typein.principalSeg r).apply_subrelIso _
#align ordinal.typein_enum Ordinal.typein_enum
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r (type s) h = f.top :=
(typein.principalSeg r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
#align ordinal.enum_type Ordinal.enum_type
@[simp]
theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
enum r (typein r a) (typein_lt_type r a) = a :=
enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a)
#align ordinal.enum_typein Ordinal.enum_typein
theorem enum_lt_enum {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h₁ : o₁ < type r)
(h₂ : o₂ < type r) : r (enum r o₁ h₁) (enum r o₂ h₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ := by
rw [← typein_lt_typein r, typein_enum, typein_enum]
#align ordinal.enum_lt_enum Ordinal.enum_lt_enum
theorem relIso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) :
∀ (hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s), f (enum r o hr) = enum s o hs := by
refine inductionOn o ?_; rintro γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩
rw [enum_type g, enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ltEquiv g f)]; rfl
#align ordinal.rel_iso_enum' Ordinal.relIso_enum'
theorem relIso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r o hr) =
enum s o
(by
convert hr using 1
apply Quotient.sound
exact ⟨f.symm⟩) :=
relIso_enum' _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.rel_iso_enum Ordinal.relIso_enum
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Ordinal (· < ·) :=
/-
wellFounded_iff_wellFounded_subrel.mpr (·.induction_on fun ⟨_, r, wo⟩ ↦
RelHomClass.wellFounded (typein.principalSeg r).subrelIso wo.wf)
-/
⟨fun a =>
inductionOn a fun α r wo =>
suffices ∀ a, Acc (· < ·) (typein r a) from
⟨_, fun o h =>
let ⟨a, e⟩ := typein_surj r h
e ▸ this a⟩
fun a =>
Acc.recOn (wo.wf.apply a) fun x _ IH =>
⟨_, fun o h => by
rcases typein_surj r (lt_trans h (typein_lt_type r _)) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact IH _ ((typein_lt_typein r).1 h)⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lt_wf Ordinal.lt_wf
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation Ordinal :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
/-- Reformulation of well founded induction on ordinals as a lemma that works with the
`induction` tactic, as in `induction i using Ordinal.induction with | h i IH => ?_`. -/
theorem induction {p : Ordinal.{u} → Prop} (i : Ordinal.{u}) (h : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j) :
p i :=
lt_wf.induction i h
#align ordinal.induction Ordinal.induction
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinality of any type on which a relation with that order
type is defined. -/
def card : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Quotient.map WellOrder.α fun _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.toEquiv⟩
#align ordinal.card Ordinal.card
@[simp]
theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : card (type r) = #α :=
rfl
#align ordinal.card_type Ordinal.card_type
-- Porting note: nolint, simpNF linter falsely claims the lemma never applies
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) :
#{ y // r y x } = (typein r x).card :=
rfl
#align ordinal.card_typein Ordinal.card_typein
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ _ _ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩ => ⟨f⟩
#align ordinal.card_le_card Ordinal.card_le_card
@[simp]
theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
#align ordinal.card_zero Ordinal.card_zero
@[simp]
theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
#align ordinal.card_one Ordinal.card_one
/-! ### Lifting ordinals to a higher universe -/
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hint .{u} below
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `Ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `Ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. For the initial segment version,
see `lift.initialSeg`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (o : Ordinal.{v}) : Ordinal.{max v u} :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w => type <| ULift.down.{u} ⁻¹'o w.r) fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift Ordinal.lift
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hints ULift.down.{v,u} below
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: Not in simpnf, added aux lemma below
theorem type_uLift (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
type (ULift.down.{v,u} ⁻¹'o r) = lift.{v} (type r) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })
rfl
#align ordinal.type_ulift Ordinal.type_uLift
-- Porting note: simpNF linter falsely claims that this never applies
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem type_uLift_aux (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
@type.{max v u} _ (fun x y => r (ULift.down.{v,u} x) (ULift.down.{v,u} y))
(inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder (ULift α) (ULift.down ⁻¹'o r))) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop}
{s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
lift.{v} (type r) = lift.{u} (type s) :=
((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <|
f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm).ordinal_type_eq
#align rel_iso.ordinal_lift_type_eq RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq
-- @[simp]
theorem type_lift_preimage {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (type (f ⁻¹'o r)) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_lift_preimage Ordinal.type_lift_preimage
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem type_lift_preimage_aux {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (@type _ (fun x y => r (f x) (f y))
(inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder β (f ⁻¹'o r)))) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp lemma never applies, tested
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a =>
inductionOn a fun _ r _ =>
Quotient.sound ⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_umax Ordinal.lift_umax
/-- `lift.{max v u, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp lemma never applies, tested
theorem lift_umax' : lift.{max v u, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
lift_umax
#align ordinal.lift_umax' Ordinal.lift_umax'
/-- An ordinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp lemma never applies, tested
theorem lift_id' (a : Ordinal) : lift a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ r _ => Quotient.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r⟩
#align ordinal.lift_id' Ordinal.lift_id'
/-- An ordinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u}
#align ordinal.lift_id Ordinal.lift_id
/-- An ordinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id' a
#align ordinal.lift_uzero Ordinal.lift_uzero
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift (a : Ordinal) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans <|
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_lift Ordinal.lift_lift
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) ≤ lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).trans <|
f.trans (InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s))⟩,
fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).trans <|
f.trans (InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm)⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_type_le Ordinal.lift_type_le
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) = lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'.trans
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s)⟩,
fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_type_eq Ordinal.lift_type_eq
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) < lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) := by
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (@Equiv.ulift.{max v w} α ⁻¹'o r) r
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift.{max v w} r) _
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (@Equiv.ulift.{max u w} β ⁻¹'o s) s
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift.{max u w} s) _
exact ⟨fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(f.equivLT (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).ltLe
(InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s))⟩,
fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨(f.equivLT (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).ltLe
(InitialSeg.ofIso (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm)⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_type_lt Ordinal.lift_type_lt
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u,v} a ≤ lift.{u,v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_type_le.{_,_,u}
#align ordinal.lift_le Ordinal.lift_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u,v} a = lift.{u,v} b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
#align ordinal.lift_inj Ordinal.lift_inj
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u,v} a < lift.{u,v} b ↔ a < b := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
#align ordinal.lift_lt Ordinal.lift_lt
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
#align ordinal.lift_zero Ordinal.lift_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
type_eq_one_of_unique _
#align ordinal.lift_one Ordinal.lift_one
@[simp]
theorem lift_card (a) : Cardinal.lift.{u,v} (card a)= card (lift.{u,v} a) :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align ordinal.lift_card Ordinal.lift_card
theorem lift_down' {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}}
(h : card.{max u v} b ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v,u} a) : ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b :=
let ⟨c, e⟩ := Cardinal.lift_down h
Cardinal.inductionOn c
(fun α =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ e' => by
rw [card_type, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{max u v, u} #β, ← Cardinal.lift_umax.{u, v},
lift_mk_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}] at e'
cases' e' with f
have g := RelIso.preimage f s
haveI := (g : f ⁻¹'o s ↪r s).isWellOrder
have := lift_type_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}.2 ⟨g⟩
rw [lift_id, lift_umax.{u, v}] at this
exact ⟨_, this⟩)
e
#align ordinal.lift_down' Ordinal.lift_down'
theorem lift_down {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} (h : b ≤ lift.{v,u} a) :
∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b :=
@lift_down' (card a) _ (by rw [lift_card]; exact card_le_card h)
#align ordinal.lift_down Ordinal.lift_down
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h
⟨a', e, lift_le.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
#align ordinal.le_lift_iff Ordinal.le_lift_iff
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h)
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
#align ordinal.lt_lift_iff Ordinal.lt_lift_iff
/-- Initial segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `ordinal.{u}` in
`ordinal.{v}` as an initial segment when `u ≤ v`. -/
def lift.initialSeg : @InitialSeg Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{max u v} (· < ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨⟨⟨lift.{v}, fun _ _ => lift_inj.1⟩, lift_lt⟩, fun _ _ h => lift_down (le_of_lt h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift.initial_seg Ordinal.lift.initialSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift.initialSeg_coe : (lift.initialSeg.{u,v} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{v,u} :=
rfl
#align ordinal.lift.initial_seg_coe Ordinal.lift.initialSeg_coe
/-! ### The first infinite ordinal `omega` -/
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega : Ordinal.{u} :=
lift <| @type ℕ (· < ·) _
#align ordinal.omega Ordinal.omega
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ω" => Ordinal.omega
/-- Note that the presence of this lemma makes `simp [omega]` form a loop. -/
@[simp]
theorem type_nat_lt : @type ℕ (· < ·) _ = ω :=
(lift_id _).symm
#align ordinal.type_nat_lt Ordinal.type_nat_lt
@[simp]
theorem card_omega : card ω = ℵ₀ :=
rfl
#align ordinal.card_omega Ordinal.card_omega
@[simp]
theorem lift_omega : lift ω = ω :=
lift_lift _
#align ordinal.lift_omega Ordinal.lift_omega
/-!
### Definition and first properties of addition on ordinals
In this paragraph, we introduce the addition on ordinals, and prove just enough properties to
deduce that the order on ordinals is total (and therefore well-founded). Further properties of
the addition, together with properties of the other operations, are proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
-/
/-- `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`. -/
instance add : Add Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ =>
Quotient.liftOn₂ o₁ o₂ (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => type (Sum.Lex r s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.sumLexCongr f g⟩⟩
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Ordinal.{u} where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
one := 1
zero_add o :=
inductionOn o fun α r _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(emptySum PEmpty α).symm, Sum.lex_inr_inr⟩⟩
add_zero o :=
inductionOn o fun α r _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(sumEmpty α PEmpty).symm, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩⟩
add_assoc o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨⟨sumAssoc _ _ _, by
intros a b
rcases a with (⟨a | a⟩ | a) <;> rcases b with (⟨b | b⟩ | b) <;>
simp only [sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl, sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr, sumAssoc_apply_inr,
Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl]⟩⟩
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem card_add (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : card (o₁ + o₂) = card o₁ + card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ __ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align ordinal.card_add Ordinal.card_add
@[simp]
theorem type_sum_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Sum.Lex r s) = type r + type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_sum_lex Ordinal.type_sum_lex
@[simp]
theorem card_nat (n : ℕ) : card.{u} n = n := by
induction n <;> [simp; simp only [card_add, card_one, Nat.cast_succ, *]]
#align ordinal.card_nat Ordinal.card_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem card_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
card.{u} (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
card_nat n
-- Porting note: Rewritten proof of elim, previous version was difficult to debug
instance add_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) where
elim := fun c a b h => by
revert h c
refine inductionOn a (fun α₁ r₁ _ ↦ ?_)
refine inductionOn b (fun α₂ r₂ _ ↦ ?_)
rintro c ⟨⟨⟨f, fo⟩, fi⟩⟩
refine inductionOn c (fun β s _ ↦ ?_)
refine ⟨⟨⟨(Embedding.refl.{u+1} _).sumMap f, ?_⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· intros a b
match a, b with
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl b => exact Sum.lex_inl_inl.trans Sum.lex_inl_inl.symm
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inr b => apply iff_of_true <;> apply Sum.Lex.sep
| Sum.inr a, Sum.inl b => apply iff_of_false <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inl
| Sum.inr a, Sum.inr b => exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.trans <| fo.trans Sum.lex_inr_inr.symm
· intros a b H
match a, b, H with
| _, Sum.inl b, _ => exact ⟨Sum.inl b, rfl⟩
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inr b, H => exact (Sum.lex_inr_inl H).elim
| Sum.inr a, Sum.inr b, H =>
let ⟨w, h⟩ := fi _ _ (Sum.lex_inr_inr.1 H)
exact ⟨Sum.inr w, congr_arg Sum.inr h⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_le Ordinal.add_covariantClass_le
-- Porting note: Rewritten proof of elim, previous version was difficult to debug
instance add_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·) where
elim := fun c a b h => by
revert h c
refine inductionOn a (fun α₁ r₁ _ ↦ ?_)
refine inductionOn b (fun α₂ r₂ _ ↦ ?_)
rintro c ⟨⟨⟨f, fo⟩, fi⟩⟩
refine inductionOn c (fun β s _ ↦ ?_)
exact @RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le _ _ (Sum.Lex r₁ s) (Sum.Lex r₂ s) _ _
⟨f.sumMap (Embedding.refl _), by
intro a b
constructor <;> intro H
· cases' a with a a <;> cases' b with b b <;> cases H <;> constructor <;>
[rwa [← fo]; assumption]
· cases H <;> constructor <;> [rwa [fo]; assumption]⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.add_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_add_right (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ a + b := by
simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
#align ordinal.le_add_right Ordinal.le_add_right
theorem le_add_left (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + a := by
simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
#align ordinal.le_add_left Ordinal.le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b =>
match lt_or_eq_of_le (le_add_left b a), lt_or_eq_of_le (le_add_right a b) with
| Or.inr h, _ => by rw [h]; exact Or.inl (le_add_right _ _)
| _, Or.inr h => by rw [h]; exact Or.inr (le_add_left _ _)
| Or.inl h₁, Or.inl h₂ => by
revert h₁ h₂
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α₁ r₁ _
refine inductionOn b ?_
intro α₂ r₂ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩
rw [← typein_top f, ← typein_top g, le_iff_lt_or_eq, le_iff_lt_or_eq,
typein_lt_typein, typein_lt_typein]
rcases trichotomous_of (Sum.Lex r₁ r₂) g.top f.top with (h | h | h) <;>
[exact Or.inl (Or.inl h); (left; right; rw [h]); exact Or.inr (Or.inl h)]
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Ordinal :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance isWellOrder : IsWellOrder Ordinal (· < ·) where
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Ordinal :=
IsWellOrder.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
theorem max_zero_left : ∀ a : Ordinal, max 0 a = a :=
max_bot_left
#align ordinal.max_zero_left Ordinal.max_zero_left
theorem max_zero_right : ∀ a : Ordinal, max a 0 = a :=
max_bot_right
#align ordinal.max_zero_right Ordinal.max_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem max_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
max_eq_bot
#align ordinal.max_eq_zero Ordinal.max_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Ordinal) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
#align ordinal.Inf_empty Ordinal.sInf_empty
/-! ### Successor order properties -/
private theorem succ_le_iff' {a b : Ordinal} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨lt_of_lt_of_le
(inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
⟨⟨⟨⟨fun x => Sum.inl x, fun _ _ => Sum.inl.inj⟩, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩,
Sum.inr PUnit.unit, fun b =>
Sum.recOn b (fun x => ⟨fun _ => ⟨x, rfl⟩, fun _ => Sum.Lex.sep _ _⟩) fun x =>
Sum.lex_inr_inr.trans ⟨False.elim, fun ⟨x, H⟩ => Sum.inl_ne_inr H⟩⟩⟩),
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β s hs ⟨⟨f, t, hf⟩⟩ => by
haveI := hs
refine ⟨⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.rec f fun _ => t) (fun a b ↦ ?_), fun a b ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rcases a with (a | _) <;> rcases b with (b | _)
· simpa only [Sum.lex_inl_inl] using f.map_rel_iff.2
· intro
rw [hf]
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
· exact False.elim ∘ Sum.lex_inr_inl
· exact False.elim ∘ Sum.lex_inr_inr.1
· rcases a with (a | _)
· intro h
have := @PrincipalSeg.init _ _ _ _ _ ⟨f, t, hf⟩ _ _ h
cases' this with w h
exact ⟨Sum.inl w, h⟩
· intro h
cases' (hf b).1 h with w h
exact ⟨Sum.inl w, h⟩⟩
instance noMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder Ordinal :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨_, succ_le_iff'.1 le_rfl⟩⟩
instance succOrder : SuccOrder Ordinal.{u} :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun o => o + 1) succ_le_iff'
@[simp]
theorem add_one_eq_succ (o : Ordinal) : o + 1 = succ o :=
rfl
#align ordinal.add_one_eq_succ Ordinal.add_one_eq_succ
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 :=
zero_add 1
#align ordinal.succ_zero Ordinal.succ_zero
-- Porting note: Proof used to be rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_one : succ (1 : Ordinal) = 2 := by congr; simp only [Nat.unaryCast, zero_add]
#align ordinal.succ_one Ordinal.succ_one
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align ordinal.add_succ Ordinal.add_succ
theorem one_le_iff_pos {o : Ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ 0 < o := by rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
#align ordinal.one_le_iff_pos Ordinal.one_le_iff_pos
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero Ordinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero
theorem succ_pos (o : Ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
bot_lt_succ o
#align ordinal.succ_pos Ordinal.succ_pos
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : Ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt <| succ_pos o
#align ordinal.succ_ne_zero Ordinal.succ_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {a : Ordinal} : a < 1 ↔ a = 0 := by
simpa using @lt_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _ _
#align ordinal.lt_one_iff_zero Ordinal.lt_one_iff_zero
theorem le_one_iff {a : Ordinal} : a ≤ 1 ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 := by
simpa using @le_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _
#align ordinal.le_one_iff Ordinal.le_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem card_succ (o : Ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 := by
simp only [← add_one_eq_succ, card_add, card_one]
#align ordinal.card_succ Ordinal.card_succ
theorem natCast_succ (n : ℕ) : ↑n.succ = succ (n : Ordinal) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nat_cast_succ Ordinal.natCast_succ
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_succ := natCast_succ
instance uniqueIioOne : Unique (Iio (1 : Ordinal)) where
default := ⟨0, by simp⟩
uniq a := Subtype.ext <| lt_one_iff_zero.1 a.2
#align ordinal.unique_Iio_one Ordinal.uniqueIioOne
instance uniqueOutOne : Unique (1 : Ordinal).out.α where
default := enum (· < ·) 0 (by simp)
uniq a := by
unfold default
rw [← @enum_typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) a]
congr
rw [← lt_one_iff_zero]
apply typein_lt_self
#align ordinal.unique_out_one Ordinal.uniqueOutOne
theorem one_out_eq (x : (1 : Ordinal).out.α) : x = enum (· < ·) 0 (by simp) :=
Unique.eq_default x
#align ordinal.one_out_eq Ordinal.one_out_eq
/-! ### Extra properties of typein and enum -/
@[simp]
theorem typein_one_out (x : (1 : Ordinal).out.α) :
@typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) x = 0 := by
rw [one_out_eq x, typein_enum]
#align ordinal.typein_one_out Ordinal.typein_one_out
@[simp]
theorem typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {x x' : α} :
typein r x ≤ typein r x' ↔ ¬r x' x := by rw [← not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
#align ordinal.typein_le_typein Ordinal.typein_le_typein
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem typein_le_typein' (o : Ordinal) {x x' : o.out.α} :
@typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) x ≤ @typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) x'
↔ x ≤ x' := by
rw [typein_le_typein]
exact not_lt
#align ordinal.typein_le_typein' Ordinal.typein_le_typein'
-- Porting note: added nolint, simpnf linter falsely claims it never applies
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem enum_le_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o o' : Ordinal} (ho : o < type r)
(ho' : o' < type r) : ¬r (enum r o' ho') (enum r o ho) ↔ o ≤ o' := by
rw [← @not_lt _ _ o' o, enum_lt_enum ho']
#align ordinal.enum_le_enum Ordinal.enum_le_enum
@[simp]
theorem enum_le_enum' (a : Ordinal) {o o' : Ordinal} (ho : o < type (· < ·))
(ho' : o' < type (· < ·)) : enum (· < ·) o ho ≤ @enum a.out.α (· < ·) _ o' ho' ↔ o ≤ o' := by
rw [← @enum_le_enum _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _), ← not_lt]
#align ordinal.enum_le_enum' Ordinal.enum_le_enum'
theorem enum_zero_le {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (h0 : 0 < type r) (a : α) :
¬r a (enum r 0 h0) := by
rw [← enum_typein r a, enum_le_enum r]
apply Ordinal.zero_le
#align ordinal.enum_zero_le Ordinal.enum_zero_le
theorem enum_zero_le' {o : Ordinal} (h0 : 0 < o) (a : o.out.α) :
@enum o.out.α (· < ·) _ 0 (by rwa [type_lt]) ≤ a := by
rw [← not_lt]
apply enum_zero_le
#align ordinal.enum_zero_le' Ordinal.enum_zero_le'
theorem le_enum_succ {o : Ordinal} (a : (succ o).out.α) :
a ≤
@enum (succ o).out.α (· < ·) _ o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) := by
rw [← @enum_typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) a, enum_le_enum', ← lt_succ_iff]
apply typein_lt_self
#align ordinal.le_enum_succ Ordinal.le_enum_succ
@[simp]
theorem enum_inj {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h₁ : o₁ < type r)
(h₂ : o₂ < type r) : enum r o₁ h₁ = enum r o₂ h₂ ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
(typein.principalSeg r).subrelIso.injective.eq_iff.trans Subtype.mk_eq_mk
#align ordinal.enum_inj Ordinal.enum_inj
-- TODO: Can we remove this definition and just use `(typein.principalSeg r).subrelIso` directly?
/-- A well order `r` is order isomorphic to the set of ordinals smaller than `type r`. -/
@[simps]
def enumIso (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Subrel (· < ·) (· < type r) ≃r r :=
{ (typein.principalSeg r).subrelIso with
toFun := fun x ↦ enum r x.1 x.2
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨typein r x, typein_lt_type r x⟩ }
#align ordinal.enum_iso Ordinal.enumIso
/-- The order isomorphism between ordinals less than `o` and `o.out.α`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def enumIsoOut (o : Ordinal) : Set.Iio o ≃o o.out.α where
toFun x :=
enum (· < ·) x.1 <| by
rw [type_lt]
exact x.2
invFun x := ⟨@typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨o', h⟩ => Subtype.ext_val (typein_enum _ _)
right_inv h := enum_typein _ _
map_rel_iff' := by
rintro ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩
apply enum_le_enum'
#align ordinal.enum_iso_out Ordinal.enumIsoOut
/-- `o.out.α` is an `OrderBot` whenever `0 < o`. -/
def outOrderBotOfPos {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : OrderBot o.out.α where
bot_le := enum_zero_le' ho
#align ordinal.out_order_bot_of_pos Ordinal.outOrderBotOfPos
theorem enum_zero_eq_bot {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) :
enum (· < ·) 0 (by rwa [type_lt]) =
haveI H := outOrderBotOfPos ho
⊥ :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_zero_eq_bot Ordinal.enum_zero_eq_bot
/-! ### Universal ordinal -/
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- `univ.{u v}` is the order type of the ordinals of `Type u` as a member
of `Ordinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). It is an inaccessible cardinal. -/
@[pp_with_univ, nolint checkUnivs]
def univ : Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
lift.{v, u + 1} (@type Ordinal (· < ·) _)
#align ordinal.univ Ordinal.univ
theorem univ_id : univ.{u, u + 1} = @type Ordinal (· < ·) _ :=
lift_id _
#align ordinal.univ_id Ordinal.univ_id
@[simp]
theorem lift_univ : lift.{w} univ.{u, v} = univ.{u, max v w} :=
lift_lift _
#align ordinal.lift_univ Ordinal.lift_univ
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u, max (u + 1) v} = univ.{u, v} :=
congr_fun lift_umax _
#align ordinal.univ_umax Ordinal.univ_umax
/-- Principal segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `ordinal.{u}` in
`ordinal.{v}` as a principal segment when `u < v`. -/
def lift.principalSeg : @PrincipalSeg Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} (· < ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨↑lift.initialSeg.{u, max (u + 1) v}, univ.{u, v}, by
refine fun b => inductionOn b ?_; intro β s _
rw [univ, ← lift_umax]; constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← lift_id (type s)] at h ⊢
cases' lift_type_lt.{_,_,v}.1 h with f
cases' f with f a hf
exists a
revert hf
-- Porting note: apply inductionOn does not work, refine does
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _ hf
refine
lift_type_eq.{u, max (u + 1) v, max (u + 1) v}.2
⟨(RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_) ?_).symm⟩
· exact fun b => enum r (f b) ((hf _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩)
· refine fun a b h => (typein_lt_typein r).1 ?_
rw [typein_enum, typein_enum]
exact f.map_rel_iff.2 h
· intro a'
cases' (hf _).1 (typein_lt_type _ a') with b e
exists b
simp only [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe]
simp [e]
· cases' h with a e
rw [← e]
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _
exact lift_type_lt.{u, u + 1, max (u + 1) v}.2 ⟨typein.principalSeg r⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift.principal_seg Ordinal.lift.principalSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift.principalSeg_coe :
(lift.principalSeg.{u, v} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{max (u + 1) v} :=
rfl
#align ordinal.lift.principal_seg_coe Ordinal.lift.principalSeg_coe
-- Porting note: Added universe hints below
@[simp]
theorem lift.principalSeg_top : (lift.principalSeg.{u,v}).top = univ.{u,v} :=
rfl
#align ordinal.lift.principal_seg_top Ordinal.lift.principalSeg_top
theorem lift.principalSeg_top' : lift.principalSeg.{u, u + 1}.top = @type Ordinal (· < ·) _ := by
simp only [lift.principalSeg_top, univ_id]
#align ordinal.lift.principal_seg_top' Ordinal.lift.principalSeg_top'
end Ordinal
/-! ### Representing a cardinal with an ordinal -/
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem mk_ordinal_out (o : Ordinal) : #o.out.α = o.card :=
(Ordinal.card_type _).symm.trans <| by rw [Ordinal.type_lt]
#align cardinal.mk_ordinal_out Cardinal.mk_ordinal_out
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. For the order-embedding version, see `ord.order_embedding`. -/
def ord (c : Cardinal) : Ordinal :=
let F := fun α : Type u => ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2
Quot.liftOn c F
(by
suffices ∀ {α β}, α ≈ β → F α ≤ F β from
fun α β h => (this h).antisymm (this (Setoid.symm h))
rintro α β ⟨f⟩
refine le_ciInf_iff'.2 fun i => ?_
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (f ⁻¹'o i.1) _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2
exact
(ciInf_le' _
(Subtype.mk (f ⁻¹'o i.val)
(@RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ _ _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2))).trans_eq
(Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage f i.1⟩))
#align cardinal.ord Cardinal.ord
theorem ord_eq_Inf (α : Type u) : ord #α = ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2 :=
rfl
#align cardinal.ord_eq_Inf Cardinal.ord_eq_Inf
theorem ord_eq (α) : ∃ (r : α → α → Prop) (wo : IsWellOrder α r), ord #α = @type α r wo :=
let ⟨r, wo⟩ := ciInf_mem fun r : { r // IsWellOrder α r } => @type α r.1 r.2
⟨r.1, r.2, wo.symm⟩
#align cardinal.ord_eq Cardinal.ord_eq
theorem ord_le_type (r : α → α → Prop) [h : IsWellOrder α r] : ord #α ≤ type r :=
ciInf_le' _ (Subtype.mk r h)
#align cardinal.ord_le_type Cardinal.ord_le_type
theorem ord_le {c o} : ord c ≤ o ↔ c ≤ o.card :=
inductionOn c fun α =>
Ordinal.inductionOn o fun β s _ => by
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α
simp only [card_type]; constructor <;> intro h
· rw [e] at h
exact
let ⟨f⟩ := h
⟨f.toEmbedding⟩
· cases' h with f
have g := RelEmbedding.preimage f s
haveI := RelEmbedding.isWellOrder g
exact le_trans (ord_le_type _) g.ordinal_type_le
#align cardinal.ord_le Cardinal.ord_le
theorem gc_ord_card : GaloisConnection ord card := fun _ _ => ord_le
#align cardinal.gc_ord_card Cardinal.gc_ord_card
theorem lt_ord {c o} : o < ord c ↔ o.card < c :=
gc_ord_card.lt_iff_lt
#align cardinal.lt_ord Cardinal.lt_ord
@[simp]
theorem card_ord (c) : (ord c).card = c :=
Quotient.inductionOn c fun α => by
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α
-- Porting note: cardinal.mk_def is now Cardinal.mk'_def, not sure why
simp only [mk'_def, e, card_type]
#align cardinal.card_ord Cardinal.card_ord
/-- Galois coinsertion between `Cardinal.ord` and `Ordinal.card`. -/
def gciOrdCard : GaloisCoinsertion ord card :=
gc_ord_card.toGaloisCoinsertion fun c => c.card_ord.le
#align cardinal.gci_ord_card Cardinal.gciOrdCard
theorem ord_card_le (o : Ordinal) : o.card.ord ≤ o :=
gc_ord_card.l_u_le _
#align cardinal.ord_card_le Cardinal.ord_card_le
theorem lt_ord_succ_card (o : Ordinal) : o < (succ o.card).ord :=
lt_ord.2 <| lt_succ _
#align cardinal.lt_ord_succ_card Cardinal.lt_ord_succ_card
theorem card_le_iff {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} : o.card ≤ c ↔ o < (succ c).ord := by
rw [lt_ord, lt_succ_iff]
/--
A variation on `Cardinal.lt_ord` using `≤`: If `o` is no greater than the
initial ordinal of cardinality `c`, then its cardinal is no greater than `c`.
The converse, however, is false (for instance, `o = ω+1` and `c = ℵ₀`).
-/
lemma card_le_of_le_ord {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} (ho : o ≤ c.ord) :
o.card ≤ c := by
rw [← card_ord c]; exact Ordinal.card_le_card ho
@[mono]
theorem ord_strictMono : StrictMono ord :=
gciOrdCard.strictMono_l
#align cardinal.ord_strict_mono Cardinal.ord_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem ord_mono : Monotone ord :=
gc_ord_card.monotone_l
#align cardinal.ord_mono Cardinal.ord_mono
@[simp]
theorem ord_le_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ ≤ ord c₂ ↔ c₁ ≤ c₂ :=
gciOrdCard.l_le_l_iff
#align cardinal.ord_le_ord Cardinal.ord_le_ord
@[simp]
theorem ord_lt_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ < ord c₂ ↔ c₁ < c₂ :=
ord_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
#align cardinal.ord_lt_ord Cardinal.ord_lt_ord
@[simp]
theorem ord_zero : ord 0 = 0 :=
gc_ord_card.l_bot
#align cardinal.ord_zero Cardinal.ord_zero
@[simp]
theorem ord_nat (n : ℕ) : ord n = n :=
(ord_le.2 (card_nat n).ge).antisymm
(by
induction' n with n IH
· apply Ordinal.zero_le
· exact succ_le_of_lt (IH.trans_lt <| ord_lt_ord.2 <| natCast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self n)))
#align cardinal.ord_nat Cardinal.ord_nat
@[simp]
theorem ord_one : ord 1 = 1 := by simpa using ord_nat 1
#align cardinal.ord_one Cardinal.ord_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ord_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ord (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ord_nat n
@[simp]
theorem lift_ord (c) : Ordinal.lift.{u,v} (ord c) = ord (lift.{u,v} c) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_) ?_
· rcases Ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 ha with ⟨a, rfl, _⟩
rwa [lt_ord, ← lift_card, lift_lt, ← lt_ord, ← Ordinal.lift_lt]
· rw [ord_le, ← lift_card, card_ord]
#align cardinal.lift_ord Cardinal.lift_ord
theorem mk_ord_out (c : Cardinal) : #c.ord.out.α = c := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_ord_out Cardinal.mk_ord_out
theorem card_typein_lt (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) (h : ord #α = type r) :
card (typein r x) < #α := by
rw [← lt_ord, h]
apply typein_lt_type
#align cardinal.card_typein_lt Cardinal.card_typein_lt
theorem card_typein_out_lt (c : Cardinal) (x : c.ord.out.α) :
card (@typein _ (· < ·) (isWellOrder_out_lt _) x) < c := by
rw [← lt_ord]
apply typein_lt_self
#align cardinal.card_typein_out_lt Cardinal.card_typein_out_lt
theorem mk_Iio_ord_out_α {c : Cardinal} (i : c.ord.out.α) : #(Iio i) < c := card_typein_out_lt c i
theorem ord_injective : Injective ord := by
intro c c' h
rw [← card_ord c, ← card_ord c', h]
#align cardinal.ord_injective Cardinal.ord_injective
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. This is the order-embedding version. For the regular function, see `ord`.
-/
def ord.orderEmbedding : Cardinal ↪o Ordinal :=
RelEmbedding.orderEmbeddingOfLTEmbedding
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone Cardinal.ord fun _ _ => Cardinal.ord_lt_ord.2)
#align cardinal.ord.order_embedding Cardinal.ord.orderEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem ord.orderEmbedding_coe : (ord.orderEmbedding : Cardinal → Ordinal) = ord :=
rfl
#align cardinal.ord.order_embedding_coe Cardinal.ord.orderEmbedding_coe
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- The cardinal `univ` is the cardinality of ordinal `univ`, or
equivalently the cardinal of `Ordinal.{u}`, or `Cardinal.{u}`,
as an element of `Cardinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). -/
@[pp_with_univ, nolint checkUnivs]
def univ :=
lift.{v, u + 1} #Ordinal
#align cardinal.univ Cardinal.univ
theorem univ_id : univ.{u, u + 1} = #Ordinal :=
lift_id _
#align cardinal.univ_id Cardinal.univ_id
@[simp]
theorem lift_univ : lift.{w} univ.{u, v} = univ.{u, max v w} :=
lift_lift _
#align cardinal.lift_univ Cardinal.lift_univ
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u, max (u + 1) v} = univ.{u, v} :=
congr_fun lift_umax _
#align cardinal.univ_umax Cardinal.univ_umax
theorem lift_lt_univ (c : Cardinal) : lift.{u + 1, u} c < univ.{u, u + 1} := by
simpa only [lift.principalSeg_coe, lift_ord, lift_succ, ord_le, succ_le_iff] using
le_of_lt (lift.principalSeg.{u, u + 1}.lt_top (succ c).ord)
#align cardinal.lift_lt_univ Cardinal.lift_lt_univ
theorem lift_lt_univ' (c : Cardinal) : lift.{max (u + 1) v, u} c < univ.{u, v} := by
have := lift_lt.{_, max (u+1) v}.2 (lift_lt_univ c)
rw [lift_lift, lift_univ, univ_umax.{u,v}] at this
exact this
#align cardinal.lift_lt_univ' Cardinal.lift_lt_univ'
@[simp]
theorem ord_univ : ord univ.{u, v} = Ordinal.univ.{u, v} := by
refine le_antisymm (ord_card_le _) <| le_of_forall_lt fun o h => lt_ord.2 ?_
have := lift.principalSeg.{u, v}.down.1 (by simpa only [lift.principalSeg_coe] using h)
rcases this with ⟨o, h'⟩
rw [← h', lift.principalSeg_coe, ← lift_card]
apply lift_lt_univ'
#align cardinal.ord_univ Cardinal.ord_univ
theorem lt_univ {c} : c < univ.{u, u + 1} ↔ ∃ c', c = lift.{u + 1, u} c' :=
⟨fun h => by
have := ord_lt_ord.2 h
rw [ord_univ] at this
cases' lift.principalSeg.{u, u + 1}.down.1 (by simpa only [lift.principalSeg_top] ) with o e
have := card_ord c
rw [← e, lift.principalSeg_coe, ← lift_card] at this
exact ⟨_, this.symm⟩, fun ⟨c', e⟩ => e.symm ▸ lift_lt_univ _⟩
#align cardinal.lt_univ Cardinal.lt_univ
theorem lt_univ' {c} : c < univ.{u, v} ↔ ∃ c', c = lift.{max (u + 1) v, u} c' :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨a, e, h'⟩ := lt_lift_iff.1 h
rw [← univ_id] at h'
rcases lt_univ.{u}.1 h' with ⟨c', rfl⟩
exact ⟨c', by simp only [e.symm, lift_lift]⟩, fun ⟨c', e⟩ => e.symm ▸ lift_lt_univ' _⟩
#align cardinal.lt_univ' Cardinal.lt_univ'
theorem small_iff_lift_mk_lt_univ {α : Type u} :
Small.{v} α ↔ Cardinal.lift.{v+1,_} #α < univ.{v, max u (v + 1)} := by
rw [lt_univ']
constructor
· rintro ⟨β, e⟩
exact ⟨#β, lift_mk_eq.{u, _, v + 1}.2 e⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact ⟨⟨c.out, lift_mk_eq.{u, _, v + 1}.1 (hc.trans (congr rfl c.mk_out.symm))⟩⟩
#align cardinal.small_iff_lift_mk_lt_univ Cardinal.small_iff_lift_mk_lt_univ
end Cardinal
namespace Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem card_univ : card univ.{u,v} = Cardinal.univ.{u,v} :=
rfl
#align ordinal.card_univ Ordinal.card_univ
@[simp]
theorem nat_le_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : Cardinal) ≤ card o ↔ (n : Ordinal) ≤ o := by
rw [← Cardinal.ord_le, Cardinal.ord_nat]
#align ordinal.nat_le_card Ordinal.nat_le_card
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 1,561 | 1,562 | theorem one_le_card {o} : 1 ≤ card o ↔ 1 ≤ o := by |
simpa using nat_le_card (n := 1)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Dual
/-!
# Matroid Restriction
Given `M : Matroid α` and `R : Set α`, the independent sets of `M` that are contained in `R`
are the independent sets of another matroid `M ↾ R` with ground set `R`,
called the 'restriction' of `M` to `R`.
For `I, R ⊆ M.E`, `I` is a basis of `R` in `M` if and only if `I` is a base
of the restriction `M ↾ R`, so this construction relates `Matroid.Basis` to `Matroid.Base`.
If `N M : Matroid α` satisfy `N = M ↾ R` for some `R ⊆ M.E`,
then we call `N` a 'restriction of `M`', and write `N ≤r M`. This is a partial order.
This file proves that the restriction is a matroid and that the `≤r` order is a partial order,
and gives related API.
It also proves some `Basis` analogues of `Base` lemmas that, while they could be stated in
`Data.Matroid.Basic`, are hard to prove without `Matroid.restrict` API.
## Main Definitions
* `M.restrict R`, written `M ↾ R`, is the restriction of `M : Matroid α` to `R : Set α`: i.e.
the matroid with ground set `R` whose independent sets are the `M`-independent subsets of `R`.
* `Matroid.Restriction N M`, written `N ≤r M`, means that `N = M ↾ R` for some `R ⊆ M.E`.
* `Matroid.StrictRestriction N M`, written `N <r M`, means that `N = M ↾ R` for some `R ⊂ M.E`.
* `Matroidᵣ α` is a type synonym for `Matroid α`, equipped with the `PartialOrder` `≤r`.
## Implementation Notes
Since `R` and `M.E` are both terms in `Set α`, to define the restriction `M ↾ R`,
we need to either insist that `R ⊆ M.E`, or to say what happens when `R` contains the junk
outside `M.E`.
It turns out that `R ⊆ M.E` is just an unnecessary hypothesis; if we say the restriction
`M ↾ R` has ground set `R` and its independent sets are the `M`-independent subsets of `R`,
we always get a matroid, in which the elements of `R \ M.E` aren't in any independent sets.
We could instead define this matroid to always be 'smaller' than `M` by setting
`(M ↾ R).E := R ∩ M.E`, but this is worse definitionally, and more generally less convenient.
This makes it possible to actually restrict a matroid 'upwards'; for instance, if `M : Matroid α`
satisfies `M.E = ∅`, then `M ↾ Set.univ` is the matroid on `α` whose ground set is all of `α`,
where the empty set is only the independent set.
(Elements of `R` outside the ground set are all 'loops' of the matroid.)
This is mathematically strange, but is useful for API building.
The cost of allowing a restriction of `M` to be 'bigger' than the `M` itself is that
the statement `M ↾ R ≤r M` is only true with the hypothesis `R ⊆ M.E`
(at least, if we want `≤r` to be a partial order).
But this isn't too inconvenient in practice. Indeed `(· ⊆ M.E)` proofs
can often be automatically provided by `aesop_mat`.
We define the restriction order `≤r` to give a `PartialOrder` instance on the type synonym
`Matroidᵣ α` rather than `Matroid α` itself, because the `PartialOrder (Matroid α)` instance is
reserved for the more mathematically important 'minor' order.
-/
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {R I J X Y : Set α}
section restrict
/-- The `IndepMatroid` whose independent sets are the independent subsets of `R`. -/
@[simps] def restrictIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := R
Indep I := M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ R
indep_empty := ⟨M.empty_indep, empty_subset _⟩
indep_subset := fun I J h hIJ ↦ ⟨h.1.subset hIJ, hIJ.trans h.2⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I I' ⟨hI, hIY⟩ (hIn : ¬ M.Basis' I R) (hI' : M.Basis' I' R)
rw [basis'_iff_basis_inter_ground] at hIn hI'
obtain ⟨B', hB', rfl⟩ := hI'.exists_base
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB, hBIB'⟩ := hI.exists_base_subset_union_base hB'
rw [hB'.inter_basis_iff_compl_inter_basis_dual, diff_inter_diff] at hI'
have hss : M.E \ (B' ∪ (R ∩ M.E)) ⊆ M.E \ (B ∪ (R ∩ M.E)) := by
apply diff_subset_diff_right
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left subset_union_right, union_comm]
exact hBIB'.trans (union_subset_union_left _ (subset_inter hIY hI.subset_ground))
have hi : M✶.Indep (M.E \ (B ∪ (R ∩ M.E))) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists]
exact ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_right subset_union_left disjoint_sdiff_left⟩
have h_eq := hI'.eq_of_subset_indep hi hss
(diff_subset_diff_right subset_union_right)
rw [h_eq, ← diff_inter_diff, ← hB.inter_basis_iff_compl_inter_basis_dual] at hI'
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.subset_basis_of_subset
(subset_inter hIB (subset_inter hIY hI.subset_ground))
obtain rfl := hI'.indep.eq_of_basis hJ
have hIJ' : I ⊂ B ∩ (R ∩ M.E) := hIJ.ssubset_of_ne (fun he ↦ hIn (by rwa [he]))
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hIJ'
exact ⟨e, ⟨⟨(hBIB' he.1.1).elim (fun h ↦ (he.2 h).elim) id,he.1.2⟩, he.2⟩,
hI'.indep.subset (insert_subset he.1 hIJ), insert_subset he.1.2.1 hIY⟩
indep_maximal := by
rintro A hAX I ⟨hI, _⟩ hIA
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.subset_basis'_of_subset hIA; use J
rw [mem_maximals_setOf_iff, and_iff_left hJ.subset, and_iff_left hIJ,
and_iff_right ⟨hJ.indep, hJ.subset.trans hAX⟩]
exact fun K ⟨⟨hK, _⟩, _, hKA⟩ hJK ↦ hJ.eq_of_subset_indep hK hJK hKA
subset_ground I := And.right
/-- Change the ground set of a matroid to some `R : Set α`. The independent sets of the restriction
are the independent subsets of the new ground set. Most commonly used when `R ⊆ M.E`,
but it is convenient not to require this. The elements of `R \ M.E` become 'loops'. -/
def restrict (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : Matroid α := (M.restrictIndepMatroid R).matroid
/-- `M ↾ R` means `M.restrict R`. -/
scoped infixl:65 " ↾ " => Matroid.restrict
@[simp] theorem restrict_indep_iff : (M ↾ R).Indep I ↔ M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ R := Iff.rfl
theorem Indep.indep_restrict_of_subset (h : M.Indep I) (hIR : I ⊆ R) : (M ↾ R).Indep I :=
restrict_indep_iff.mpr ⟨h,hIR⟩
theorem Indep.of_restrict (hI : (M ↾ R).Indep I) : M.Indep I :=
(restrict_indep_iff.1 hI).1
@[simp] theorem restrict_ground_eq : (M ↾ R).E = R := rfl
theorem restrict_finite {R : Set α} (hR : R.Finite) : (M ↾ R).Finite :=
⟨hR⟩
@[simp] theorem restrict_dep_iff : (M ↾ R).Dep X ↔ ¬ M.Indep X ∧ X ⊆ R := by
rw [Dep, restrict_indep_iff, restrict_ground_eq]; tauto
@[simp] theorem restrict_ground_eq_self (M : Matroid α) : (M ↾ M.E) = M := by
refine eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall rfl ?_; aesop
theorem restrict_restrict_eq {R₁ R₂ : Set α} (M : Matroid α) (hR : R₂ ⊆ R₁) :
(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂ := by
refine eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall rfl ?_
simp only [restrict_ground_eq, restrict_indep_iff, and_congr_left_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ h _ _ ↦ h.trans hR
@[simp] theorem restrict_idem (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : M ↾ R ↾ R = M ↾ R := by
rw [M.restrict_restrict_eq Subset.rfl]
@[simp] theorem base_restrict_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
(M ↾ X).Base I ↔ M.Basis I X := by
simp_rw [base_iff_maximal_indep, basis_iff', restrict_indep_iff, and_iff_left hX, and_assoc]
aesop
theorem base_restrict_iff' : (M ↾ X).Base I ↔ M.Basis' I X := by
simp_rw [Basis', base_iff_maximal_indep, mem_maximals_setOf_iff, restrict_indep_iff]
theorem Basis.restrict_base (h : M.Basis I X) : (M ↾ X).Base I := by
rw [basis_iff'] at h
simp_rw [base_iff_maximal_indep, restrict_indep_iff, and_imp, and_assoc, and_iff_right h.1.1,
and_iff_right h.1.2.1]
exact fun J hJ hJX hIJ ↦ h.1.2.2 _ hJ hIJ hJX
instance restrict_finiteRk [M.FiniteRk] (R : Set α) : (M ↾ R).FiniteRk :=
let ⟨_, hB⟩ := (M ↾ R).exists_base
hB.finiteRk_of_finite (hB.indep.of_restrict.finite)
instance restrict_finitary [Finitary M] (R : Set α) : Finitary (M ↾ R) := by
refine ⟨fun I hI ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [restrict_indep_iff] at *
rw [indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep]
exact ⟨fun J hJ hJfin ↦ (hI J hJ hJfin).1,
fun e heI ↦ singleton_subset_iff.1 (hI _ (by simpa) (toFinite _)).2⟩
@[simp] theorem Basis.base_restrict (h : M.Basis I X) : (M ↾ X).Base I :=
(base_restrict_iff h.subset_ground).mpr h
theorem Basis.basis_restrict_of_subset (hI : M.Basis I X) (hXY : X ⊆ Y) : (M ↾ Y).Basis I X := by
rwa [← base_restrict_iff, M.restrict_restrict_eq hXY, base_restrict_iff]
theorem basis'_restrict_iff : (M ↾ R).Basis' I X ↔ M.Basis' I (X ∩ R) ∧ I ⊆ R := by
simp_rw [Basis', mem_maximals_setOf_iff, restrict_indep_iff, subset_inter_iff, and_imp]; tauto
theorem basis_restrict_iff' : (M ↾ R).Basis I X ↔ M.Basis I (X ∩ M.E) ∧ X ⊆ R := by
rw [basis_iff_basis'_subset_ground, basis'_restrict_iff, restrict_ground_eq, and_congr_left_iff,
← basis'_iff_basis_inter_ground]
intro hXR
rw [inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hXR, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun h ↦ h.subset.trans hXR
theorem basis_restrict_iff (hR : R ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
(M ↾ R).Basis I X ↔ M.Basis I X ∧ X ⊆ R := by
rw [basis_restrict_iff', and_congr_left_iff]
intro hXR
rw [← basis'_iff_basis_inter_ground, basis'_iff_basis]
theorem restrict_eq_restrict_iff (M M' : Matroid α) (X : Set α) :
M ↾ X = M' ↾ X ↔ ∀ I, I ⊆ X → (M.Indep I ↔ M'.Indep I) := by
refine ⟨fun h I hIX ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall rfl fun I (hI : I ⊆ X) ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← and_iff_left (a := (M.Indep I)) hIX, ← and_iff_left (a := (M'.Indep I)) hIX,
← restrict_indep_iff, h, restrict_indep_iff]
rw [restrict_indep_iff, and_iff_left hI, restrict_indep_iff, and_iff_left hI, h _ hI]
@[simp] theorem restrict_eq_self_iff : M ↾ R = M ↔ R = M.E :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h]; rfl, fun h ↦ by simp [h]⟩
end restrict
section Restriction
variable {N : Matroid α}
/-- `Restriction N M` means that `N = M ↾ R` for some subset `R` of `M.E` -/
def Restriction (N M : Matroid α) : Prop := ∃ R ⊆ M.E, N = M ↾ R
/-- `StrictRestriction N M` means that `N = M ↾ R` for some strict subset `R` of `M.E` -/
def StrictRestriction (N M : Matroid α) : Prop := Restriction N M ∧ ¬ Restriction M N
/-- `N ≤r M` means that `N` is a `Restriction` of `M`. -/
scoped infix:50 " ≤r " => Restriction
/-- `N <r M` means that `N` is a `StrictRestriction` of `M`. -/
scoped infix:50 " <r " => StrictRestriction
/-- A type synonym for matroids with the restriction order.
(The `PartialOrder` on `Matroid α` is reserved for the minor order) -/
@[ext] structure Matroidᵣ (α : Type*) where ofMatroid ::
/-- The underlying `Matroid`.-/
toMatroid : Matroid α
instance {α : Type*} : CoeOut (Matroidᵣ α) (Matroid α) where
coe := Matroidᵣ.toMatroid
@[simp] theorem Matroidᵣ.coe_inj {M₁ M₂ : Matroidᵣ α} :
(M₁ : Matroid α) = (M₂ : Matroid α) ↔ M₁ = M₂ := by
cases M₁; cases M₂; simp
instance {α : Type*} : PartialOrder (Matroidᵣ α) where
le := (· ≤r ·)
le_refl M := ⟨(M : Matroid α).E, Subset.rfl, (M : Matroid α).restrict_ground_eq_self.symm⟩
le_trans M₁ M₂ M₃ := by
rintro ⟨R, hR, h₁⟩ ⟨R', hR', h₂⟩
change _ ≤r _
rw [h₂] at h₁ hR
rw [h₁, restrict_restrict_eq _ (show R ⊆ R' from hR)]
exact ⟨R, hR.trans hR', rfl⟩
le_antisymm M₁ M₂ := by
rintro ⟨R, hR, h⟩ ⟨R', hR', h'⟩
rw [h', restrict_ground_eq] at hR
rw [h, restrict_ground_eq] at hR'
rw [← Matroidᵣ.coe_inj, h, h', hR.antisymm hR', restrict_idem]
@[simp] protected theorem Matroidᵣ.le_iff {M M' : Matroidᵣ α} :
M ≤ M' ↔ (M : Matroid α) ≤r (M' : Matroid α) := Iff.rfl
@[simp] protected theorem Matroidᵣ.lt_iff {M M' : Matroidᵣ α} :
M < M' ↔ (M : Matroid α) <r (M' : Matroid α) := Iff.rfl
theorem ofMatroid_le_iff {M M' : Matroid α} :
Matroidᵣ.ofMatroid M ≤ Matroidᵣ.ofMatroid M' ↔ M ≤r M' := by
simp
theorem ofMatroid_lt_iff {M M' : Matroid α} :
Matroidᵣ.ofMatroid M < Matroidᵣ.ofMatroid M' ↔ M <r M' := by
simp
theorem Restriction.refl : M ≤r M :=
le_refl (Matroidᵣ.ofMatroid M)
theorem Restriction.antisymm {M' : Matroid α} (h : M ≤r M') (h' : M' ≤r M) : M = M' := by
simpa using (ofMatroid_le_iff.2 h).antisymm (ofMatroid_le_iff.2 h')
theorem Restriction.trans {M₁ M₂ M₃ : Matroid α} (h : M₁ ≤r M₂) (h' : M₂ ≤r M₃) : M₁ ≤r M₃ :=
le_trans (α := Matroidᵣ α) h h'
theorem restrict_restriction (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) (hR : R ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M ↾ R ≤r M :=
⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Restrict.lean | 281 | 282 | theorem Restriction.eq_restrict (h : N ≤r M) : M ↾ N.E = N := by |
obtain ⟨R, -, rfl⟩ := h; rw [restrict_ground_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
#align_import algebra.big_operators.associated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Products of associated, prime, and irreducible elements.
This file contains some theorems relating definitions in `Algebra.Associated`
and products of multisets, finsets, and finsupps.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
-- the same local notation used in `Algebra.Associated`
local infixl:50 " ~ᵤ " => Associated
namespace Prime
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
theorem exists_mem_multiset_dvd {s : Multiset α} : p ∣ s.prod → ∃ a ∈ s, p ∣ a :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun h => (hp.not_dvd_one h).elim) fun a s ih h =>
have : p ∣ a * s.prod := by simpa using h
match hp.dvd_or_dvd this with
| Or.inl h => ⟨a, Multiset.mem_cons_self a s, h⟩
| Or.inr h =>
let ⟨a, has, h⟩ := ih h
⟨a, Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem has, h⟩
#align prime.exists_mem_multiset_dvd Prime.exists_mem_multiset_dvd
theorem exists_mem_multiset_map_dvd {s : Multiset β} {f : β → α} :
p ∣ (s.map f).prod → ∃ a ∈ s, p ∣ f a := fun h => by
simpa only [exists_prop, Multiset.mem_map, exists_exists_and_eq_and] using
hp.exists_mem_multiset_dvd h
#align prime.exists_mem_multiset_map_dvd Prime.exists_mem_multiset_map_dvd
theorem exists_mem_finset_dvd {s : Finset β} {f : β → α} : p ∣ s.prod f → ∃ i ∈ s, p ∣ f i :=
hp.exists_mem_multiset_map_dvd
#align prime.exists_mem_finset_dvd Prime.exists_mem_finset_dvd
end Prime
theorem Prod.associated_iff {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] {x z : M × N} :
x ~ᵤ z ↔ x.1 ~ᵤ z.1 ∧ x.2 ~ᵤ z.2 :=
⟨fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨⟨(MulEquiv.prodUnits.toFun u).1, (Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 hu).1⟩,
⟨(MulEquiv.prodUnits.toFun u).2, (Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 hu).2⟩⟩,
fun ⟨⟨u₁, h₁⟩, ⟨u₂, h₂⟩⟩ =>
⟨MulEquiv.prodUnits.invFun (u₁, u₂), Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Associated.lean | 58 | 69 | theorem Associated.prod {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → M)
(g : ι → M) (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → (f i) ~ᵤ (g i)) : (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ~ᵤ (∏ i ∈ s, g i) := by |
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty =>
simp only [Finset.prod_empty]
rfl
| @insert j s hjs IH =>
classical
convert_to (∏ i ∈ insert j s, f i) ~ᵤ (∏ i ∈ insert j s, g i)
rw [Finset.prod_insert hjs, Finset.prod_insert hjs]
exact Associated.mul_mul (h j (Finset.mem_insert_self j s))
(IH (fun i hi ↦ h i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
#align_import field_theory.intermediate_field from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c596622fccd6e0321979d94931c964054dea2d26"
/-!
# Intermediate fields
Let `L / K` be a field extension, given as an instance `Algebra K L`.
This file defines the type of fields in between `K` and `L`, `IntermediateField K L`.
An `IntermediateField K L` is a subfield of `L` which contains (the image of) `K`,
i.e. it is a `Subfield L` and a `Subalgebra K L`.
## Main definitions
* `IntermediateField K L` : the type of intermediate fields between `K` and `L`.
* `Subalgebra.to_intermediateField`: turns a subalgebra closed under `⁻¹`
into an intermediate field
* `Subfield.to_intermediateField`: turns a subfield containing the image of `K`
into an intermediate field
* `IntermediateField.map`: map an intermediate field along an `AlgHom`
* `IntermediateField.restrict_scalars`: restrict the scalars of an intermediate field to a smaller
field in a tower of fields.
## Implementation notes
Intermediate fields are defined with a structure extending `Subfield` and `Subalgebra`.
A `Subalgebra` is closed under all operations except `⁻¹`,
## Tags
intermediate field, field extension
-/
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable (K L L' : Type*) [Field K] [Field L] [Field L'] [Algebra K L] [Algebra K L']
/-- `S : IntermediateField K L` is a subset of `L` such that there is a field
tower `L / S / K`. -/
structure IntermediateField extends Subalgebra K L where
inv_mem' : ∀ x ∈ carrier, x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align intermediate_field IntermediateField
/-- Reinterpret an `IntermediateField` as a `Subalgebra`. -/
add_decl_doc IntermediateField.toSubalgebra
variable {K L L'}
variable (S : IntermediateField K L)
namespace IntermediateField
instance : SetLike (IntermediateField K L) L :=
⟨fun S => S.toSubalgebra.carrier, by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp ⟩
protected theorem neg_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) : -x ∈ S := by
show -x ∈S.toSubalgebra; simpa
#align intermediate_field.neg_mem IntermediateField.neg_mem
/-- Reinterpret an `IntermediateField` as a `Subfield`. -/
def toSubfield : Subfield L :=
{ S.toSubalgebra with
neg_mem' := S.neg_mem,
inv_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
#align intermediate_field.to_subfield IntermediateField.toSubfield
instance : SubfieldClass (IntermediateField K L) L where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
neg_mem {s} := s.neg_mem
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
one_mem {s} := s.one_mem'
inv_mem {s} := s.inv_mem' _
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): simp can prove it
theorem mem_carrier {s : IntermediateField K L} {x : L} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_carrier IntermediateField.mem_carrier
/-- Two intermediate fields are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : IntermediateField K L} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align intermediate_field.ext IntermediateField.ext
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubalgebra : (S.toSubalgebra : Set L) = S :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.coe_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubfield : (S.toSubfield : Set L) = S :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_to_subfield IntermediateField.coe_toSubfield
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk (s : Subsemiring L) (hK : ∀ x, algebraMap K L x ∈ s) (hi) (x : L) :
x ∈ IntermediateField.mk (Subalgebra.mk s hK) hi ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_mk IntermediateField.mem_mkₓ
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubalgebra (s : IntermediateField K L) (x : L) : x ∈ s.toSubalgebra ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.mem_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubfield (s : IntermediateField K L) (x : L) : x ∈ s.toSubfield ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_to_subfield IntermediateField.mem_toSubfield
/-- Copy of an intermediate field with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) :
IntermediateField K L where
toSubalgebra := S.toSubalgebra.copy s (hs : s = S.toSubalgebra.carrier)
inv_mem' :=
have hs' : (S.toSubalgebra.copy s hs).carrier = S.toSubalgebra.carrier := hs
hs'.symm ▸ S.inv_mem'
#align intermediate_field.copy IntermediateField.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set L) = s :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_copy IntermediateField.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align intermediate_field.copy_eq IntermediateField.copy_eq
section InheritedLemmas
/-! ### Lemmas inherited from more general structures
The declarations in this section derive from the fact that an `IntermediateField` is also a
subalgebra or subfield. Their use should be replaceable with the corresponding lemma from a
subobject class.
-/
/-- An intermediate field contains the image of the smaller field. -/
theorem algebraMap_mem (x : K) : algebraMap K L x ∈ S :=
S.algebraMap_mem' x
#align intermediate_field.algebra_map_mem IntermediateField.algebraMap_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
theorem smul_mem {y : L} : y ∈ S → ∀ {x : K}, x • y ∈ S :=
S.toSubalgebra.smul_mem
#align intermediate_field.smul_mem IntermediateField.smul_mem
/-- An intermediate field contains the ring's 1. -/
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : L) ∈ S :=
one_mem S
#align intermediate_field.one_mem IntermediateField.one_mem
/-- An intermediate field contains the ring's 0. -/
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : L) ∈ S :=
zero_mem S
#align intermediate_field.zero_mem IntermediateField.zero_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under multiplication. -/
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x * y ∈ S :=
mul_mem
#align intermediate_field.mul_mem IntermediateField.mul_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under addition. -/
protected theorem add_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x + y ∈ S :=
add_mem
#align intermediate_field.add_mem IntermediateField.add_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under subtraction -/
protected theorem sub_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x - y ∈ S :=
sub_mem
#align intermediate_field.sub_mem IntermediateField.sub_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under inverses. -/
protected theorem inv_mem {x : L} : x ∈ S → x⁻¹ ∈ S :=
inv_mem
#align intermediate_field.inv_mem IntermediateField.inv_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under division. -/
protected theorem div_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x / y ∈ S :=
div_mem
#align intermediate_field.div_mem IntermediateField.div_mem
/-- Product of a list of elements in an intermediate_field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem list_prod_mem {l : List L} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ S) → l.prod ∈ S :=
list_prod_mem
#align intermediate_field.list_prod_mem IntermediateField.list_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a list of elements in an intermediate field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem list_sum_mem {l : List L} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ S) → l.sum ∈ S :=
list_sum_mem
#align intermediate_field.list_sum_mem IntermediateField.list_sum_mem
/-- Product of a multiset of elements in an intermediate field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem multiset_prod_mem (m : Multiset L) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ S) → m.prod ∈ S :=
multiset_prod_mem m
#align intermediate_field.multiset_prod_mem IntermediateField.multiset_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a multiset of elements in an `IntermediateField` is in the `IntermediateField`. -/
protected theorem multiset_sum_mem (m : Multiset L) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ S) → m.sum ∈ S :=
multiset_sum_mem m
#align intermediate_field.multiset_sum_mem IntermediateField.multiset_sum_mem
/-- Product of elements of an intermediate field indexed by a `Finset` is in the intermediate_field.
-/
protected theorem prod_mem {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → L} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ S) :
(∏ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ S :=
prod_mem h
#align intermediate_field.prod_mem IntermediateField.prod_mem
/-- Sum of elements in an `IntermediateField` indexed by a `Finset` is in the `IntermediateField`.
-/
protected theorem sum_mem {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → L} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ S) :
(∑ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ S :=
sum_mem h
#align intermediate_field.sum_mem IntermediateField.sum_mem
protected theorem pow_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℤ) : x ^ n ∈ S :=
zpow_mem hx n
#align intermediate_field.pow_mem IntermediateField.pow_mem
protected theorem zsmul_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℤ) : n • x ∈ S :=
zsmul_mem hx n
#align intermediate_field.zsmul_mem IntermediateField.zsmul_mem
protected theorem intCast_mem (n : ℤ) : (n : L) ∈ S :=
intCast_mem S n
#align intermediate_field.coe_int_mem IntermediateField.intCast_mem
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : L) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_add IntermediateField.coe_add
protected theorem coe_neg (x : S) : (↑(-x) : L) = -↑x :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_neg IntermediateField.coe_neg
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : L) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_mul IntermediateField.coe_mul
protected theorem coe_inv (x : S) : (↑x⁻¹ : L) = (↑x)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_inv IntermediateField.coe_inv
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : L) = 0 :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_zero IntermediateField.coe_zero
protected theorem coe_one : ((1 : S) : L) = 1 :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_one IntermediateField.coe_one
protected theorem coe_pow (x : S) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n : S) : L) = (x : L) ^ n :=
SubmonoidClass.coe_pow x n
#align intermediate_field.coe_pow IntermediateField.coe_pow
end InheritedLemmas
theorem natCast_mem (n : ℕ) : (n : L) ∈ S := by simpa using intCast_mem S n
#align intermediate_field.coe_nat_mem IntermediateField.natCast_mem
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated _root_.natCast_mem] alias coe_nat_mem := natCast_mem
@[deprecated _root_.intCast_mem] alias coe_int_mem := intCast_mem
end IntermediateField
/-- Turn a subalgebra closed under inverses into an intermediate field -/
def Subalgebra.toIntermediateField (S : Subalgebra K L) (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ S, x⁻¹ ∈ S) :
IntermediateField K L :=
{ S with
inv_mem' := inv_mem }
#align subalgebra.to_intermediate_field Subalgebra.toIntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField (S : Subalgebra K L) (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ S, x⁻¹ ∈ S) :
(S.toIntermediateField inv_mem).toSubalgebra = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_subalgebra_to_intermediate_field toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem toIntermediateField_toSubalgebra (S : IntermediateField K L) :
(S.toSubalgebra.toIntermediateField fun x => S.inv_mem) = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_intermediate_field_to_subalgebra toIntermediateField_toSubalgebra
/-- Turn a subalgebra satisfying `IsField` into an intermediate_field -/
def Subalgebra.toIntermediateField' (S : Subalgebra K L) (hS : IsField S) : IntermediateField K L :=
S.toIntermediateField fun x hx => by
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0, inv_zero]
exact S.zero_mem
letI hS' := hS.toField
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS.mul_inv_cancel (show (⟨x, hx⟩ : S) ≠ 0 from Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 hx0)
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, S.coe_mul, S.coe_one, Subtype.coe_mk, mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq₀ hx0] at hy
exact hy.symm ▸ y.2
#align subalgebra.to_intermediate_field' Subalgebra.toIntermediateField'
@[simp]
theorem toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField' (S : Subalgebra K L) (hS : IsField S) :
(S.toIntermediateField' hS).toSubalgebra = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_subalgebra_to_intermediate_field' toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField'
@[simp]
theorem toIntermediateField'_toSubalgebra (S : IntermediateField K L) :
S.toSubalgebra.toIntermediateField' (Field.toIsField S) = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_intermediate_field'_to_subalgebra toIntermediateField'_toSubalgebra
/-- Turn a subfield of `L` containing the image of `K` into an intermediate field -/
def Subfield.toIntermediateField (S : Subfield L) (algebra_map_mem : ∀ x, algebraMap K L x ∈ S) :
IntermediateField K L :=
{ S with
algebraMap_mem' := algebra_map_mem }
#align subfield.to_intermediate_field Subfield.toIntermediateField
namespace IntermediateField
/-- An intermediate field inherits a field structure -/
instance toField : Field S :=
S.toSubfield.toField
#align intermediate_field.to_field IntermediateField.toField
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → S) : (↑(∑ i, f i) : L) = ∑ i, (f i : L) := by
classical
induction' (Finset.univ : Finset ι) using Finset.induction_on with i s hi H
· simp
· rw [Finset.sum_insert hi, AddMemClass.coe_add, H, Finset.sum_insert hi]
#align intermediate_field.coe_sum IntermediateField.coe_sum
@[norm_cast] --Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem coe_prod {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → S) : (↑(∏ i, f i) : L) = ∏ i, (f i : L) := by
classical
induction' (Finset.univ : Finset ι) using Finset.induction_on with i s hi H
· simp
· rw [Finset.prod_insert hi, MulMemClass.coe_mul, H, Finset.prod_insert hi]
#align intermediate_field.coe_prod IntermediateField.coe_prod
/-! `IntermediateField`s inherit structure from their `Subalgebra` coercions. -/
instance module' {R} [Semiring R] [SMul R K] [Module R L] [IsScalarTower R K L] : Module R S :=
S.toSubalgebra.module'
#align intermediate_field.module' IntermediateField.module'
instance module : Module K S :=
inferInstanceAs (Module K S.toSubsemiring)
#align intermediate_field.module IntermediateField.module
instance isScalarTower {R} [Semiring R] [SMul R K] [Module R L] [IsScalarTower R K L] :
IsScalarTower R K S :=
inferInstanceAs (IsScalarTower R K S.toSubsemiring)
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower IntermediateField.isScalarTower
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul {R} [Semiring R] [SMul R K] [Module R L] [IsScalarTower R K L] (r : R) (x : S) :
↑(r • x : S) = (r • (x : L)) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_smul IntermediateField.coe_smul
#noalign intermediate_field.algebra'
instance algebra : Algebra K S :=
inferInstanceAs (Algebra K S.toSubsemiring)
#align intermediate_field.algebra IntermediateField.algebra
#noalign intermediate_field.to_algebra
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_apply (x : S) : algebraMap S L x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_algebraMap_apply (x : K) : ↑(algebraMap K S x) = algebraMap K L x := rfl
instance isScalarTower_bot {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Algebra L R] : IsScalarTower S L R :=
IsScalarTower.subalgebra _ _ _ S.toSubalgebra
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_bot IntermediateField.isScalarTower_bot
instance isScalarTower_mid {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Algebra L R] [Algebra K R]
[IsScalarTower K L R] : IsScalarTower K S R :=
IsScalarTower.subalgebra' _ _ _ S.toSubalgebra
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_mid IntermediateField.isScalarTower_mid
/-- Specialize `is_scalar_tower_mid` to the common case where the top field is `L` -/
instance isScalarTower_mid' : IsScalarTower K S L :=
S.isScalarTower_mid
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_mid' IntermediateField.isScalarTower_mid'
section shortcut_instances
variable {E} [Field E] [Algebra L E] (T : IntermediateField S E) {S}
instance : Algebra S T := T.algebra
instance : Module S T := Algebra.toModule
instance : SMul S T := Algebra.toSMul
instance [Algebra K E] [IsScalarTower K L E] : IsScalarTower K S T := T.isScalarTower
end shortcut_instances
/-- Given `f : L →ₐ[K] L'`, `S.comap f` is the intermediate field between `K` and `L`
such that `f x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S.comap f`. -/
def comap (f : L →ₐ[K] L') (S : IntermediateField K L') : IntermediateField K L where
__ := S.toSubalgebra.comap f
inv_mem' x hx := show f x⁻¹ ∈ S by rw [map_inv₀ f x]; exact S.inv_mem hx
/-- Given `f : L →ₐ[K] L'`, `S.map f` is the intermediate field between `K` and `L'`
such that `x ∈ S ↔ f x ∈ S.map f`. -/
def map (f : L →ₐ[K] L') (S : IntermediateField K L) : IntermediateField K L' where
__ := S.toSubalgebra.map f
inv_mem' := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, S.inv_mem hx, map_inv₀ f x⟩
#align intermediate_field.map IntermediateField.map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : L →ₐ[K] L') : (S.map f : Set L') = f '' S :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_map IntermediateField.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem toSubalgebra_map (f : L →ₐ[K] L') : (S.map f).toSubalgebra = S.toSubalgebra.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubfield_map (f : L →ₐ[K] L') : (S.map f).toSubfield = S.toSubfield.map f :=
rfl
theorem map_map {K L₁ L₂ L₃ : Type*} [Field K] [Field L₁] [Algebra K L₁] [Field L₂] [Algebra K L₂]
[Field L₃] [Algebra K L₃] (E : IntermediateField K L₁) (f : L₁ →ₐ[K] L₂) (g : L₂ →ₐ[K] L₃) :
(E.map f).map g = E.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.map_map IntermediateField.map_map
theorem map_mono (f : L →ₐ[K] L') {S T : IntermediateField K L} (h : S ≤ T) :
S.map f ≤ T.map f :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.image_subset f h)
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : L →ₐ[K] L'}
{s : IntermediateField K L} {t : IntermediateField K L'} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f :L →ₐ[K] L') : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) :=
fun _ _ ↦ map_le_iff_le_comap
/-- Given an equivalence `e : L ≃ₐ[K] L'` of `K`-field extensions and an intermediate
field `E` of `L/K`, `intermediateFieldMap e E` is the induced equivalence
between `E` and `E.map e` -/
def intermediateFieldMap (e : L ≃ₐ[K] L') (E : IntermediateField K L) : E ≃ₐ[K] E.map e.toAlgHom :=
e.subalgebraMap E.toSubalgebra
#align intermediate_field.intermediate_field_map IntermediateField.intermediateFieldMap
/- We manually add these two simp lemmas because `@[simps]` before `intermediate_field_map`
led to a timeout. -/
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem intermediateFieldMap_apply_coe (e : L ≃ₐ[K] L') (E : IntermediateField K L) (a : E) :
↑(intermediateFieldMap e E a) = e a :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.intermediate_field_map_apply_coe IntermediateField.intermediateFieldMap_apply_coe
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem intermediateFieldMap_symm_apply_coe (e : L ≃ₐ[K] L') (E : IntermediateField K L)
(a : E.map e.toAlgHom) : ↑((intermediateFieldMap e E).symm a) = e.symm a :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.intermediate_field_map_symm_apply_coe IntermediateField.intermediateFieldMap_symm_apply_coe
end IntermediateField
namespace AlgHom
variable (f : L →ₐ[K] L')
/-- The range of an algebra homomorphism, as an intermediate field. -/
@[simps toSubalgebra]
def fieldRange : IntermediateField K L' :=
{ f.range, (f : L →+* L').fieldRange with }
#align alg_hom.field_range AlgHom.fieldRange
@[simp]
theorem coe_fieldRange : ↑f.fieldRange = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_field_range AlgHom.coe_fieldRange
@[simp]
theorem fieldRange_toSubfield : f.fieldRange.toSubfield = (f : L →+* L').fieldRange :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.field_range_to_subfield AlgHom.fieldRange_toSubfield
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem mem_fieldRange {y : L'} : y ∈ f.fieldRange ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align alg_hom.mem_field_range AlgHom.mem_fieldRange
end AlgHom
namespace IntermediateField
/-- The embedding from an intermediate field of `L / K` to `L`. -/
def val : S →ₐ[K] L :=
S.toSubalgebra.val
#align intermediate_field.val IntermediateField.val
@[simp]
theorem coe_val : ⇑S.val = ((↑) : S → L) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_val IntermediateField.coe_val
@[simp]
theorem val_mk {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) : S.val ⟨x, hx⟩ = x :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.val_mk IntermediateField.val_mk
theorem range_val : S.val.range = S.toSubalgebra :=
S.toSubalgebra.range_val
#align intermediate_field.range_val IntermediateField.range_val
@[simp]
theorem fieldRange_val : S.val.fieldRange = S :=
SetLike.ext' Subtype.range_val
#align intermediate_field.field_range_val IntermediateField.fieldRange_val
instance AlgHom.inhabited : Inhabited (S →ₐ[K] L) :=
⟨S.val⟩
#align intermediate_field.alg_hom.inhabited IntermediateField.AlgHom.inhabited
theorem aeval_coe {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R K] [Algebra R L] [IsScalarTower R K L]
(x : S) (P : R[X]) : aeval (x : L) P = aeval x P := by
refine Polynomial.induction_on' P (fun f g hf hg => ?_) fun n r => ?_
· rw [aeval_add, aeval_add, AddMemClass.coe_add, hf, hg]
· simp only [MulMemClass.coe_mul, aeval_monomial, SubmonoidClass.coe_pow, mul_eq_mul_right_iff]
left
rfl
#align intermediate_field.aeval_coe IntermediateField.aeval_coe
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IntermediateField.lean | 554 | 565 | theorem coe_isIntegral_iff {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R K] [Algebra R L]
[IsScalarTower R K L] {x : S} : IsIntegral R (x : L) ↔ IsIntegral R x := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨P, hPmo, hProot⟩ := h
refine ⟨P, hPmo, (injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).1 (algebraMap (↥S) L).injective _ ?_⟩
letI : IsScalarTower R S L := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq (congr_fun rfl)
rw [eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← eval₂_at_apply, eval₂_eq_eval_map, Polynomial.map_map, ←
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map]
exact hProot
· obtain ⟨P, hPmo, hProot⟩ := h
refine ⟨P, hPmo, ?_⟩
rw [← aeval_def, aeval_coe, aeval_def, hProot, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
#align_import analysis.convex.gauge from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"373b03b5b9d0486534edbe94747f23cb3712f93d"
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
#align gauge gauge
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
#align gauge_def gauge_def
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
#align gauge_def' gauge_def'
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
#align absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
#align gauge_mono gauge_mono
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
#align exists_lt_of_gauge_lt exists_lt_of_gauge_lt
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
#align gauge_zero gauge_zero
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
#align gauge_zero' gauge_zero'
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
#align gauge_empty gauge_empty
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
#align gauge_of_subset_zero gauge_of_subset_zero
/-- The gauge is always nonnegative. -/
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg _ fun _ hx => hx.1.le
#align gauge_nonneg gauge_nonneg
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
#align gauge_neg gauge_neg
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
#align gauge_neg_set_neg gauge_neg_set_neg
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
#align gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
#align gauge_le_of_mem gauge_le_of_mem
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
#align gauge_le_eq gauge_le_eq
theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
#align gauge_lt_eq' gauge_lt_eq'
theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
#align gauge_lt_eq gauge_lt_eq
theorem mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hgauge : gauge s x < 1) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ∈ openSegment ℝ 0 y := by
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs hgauge with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, 1 - r, r, ?_⟩
simp [*]
theorem gauge_lt_one_subset_self (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } ⊆ s := fun _x hx ↦
let ⟨_y, hys, hx⟩ := mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one absorbs hx
hs.openSegment_subset h₀ hys hx
#align gauge_lt_one_subset_self gauge_lt_one_subset_self
theorem gauge_le_one_of_mem {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) : gauge s x ≤ 1 :=
gauge_le_of_mem zero_le_one <| by rwa [one_smul]
#align gauge_le_one_of_mem gauge_le_one_of_mem
/-- Gauge is subadditive. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 201 | 212 | theorem gauge_add_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (x y : E) :
gauge s (x + y) ≤ gauge s x + gauge s y := by |
refine le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha', x, hx, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s x) (half_pos hε))
obtain ⟨b, hb, hb', y, hy, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s y) (half_pos hε))
calc
gauge s (a • x + b • y) ≤ a + b := gauge_le_of_mem (by positivity) <| by
rw [hs.add_smul ha.le hb.le]
exact add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set hx) (smul_mem_smul_set hy)
_ < gauge s (a • x) + gauge s (b • y) + ε := by linarith
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
#align_import data.int.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
/-!
# Finite intervals of integers
This file proves that `ℤ` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
-/
open Finset Int
namespace Int
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℤ where
finsetIcc a b :=
(Finset.range (b + 1 - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a
finsetIco a b := (Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a
finsetIoc a b :=
(Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)
finsetIoo a b :=
(Finset.range (b - a - 1).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [lt_sub_iff_add_lt, Int.lt_add_one_iff, add_comm] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - a).toNat
rw [← lt_add_one_iff] at hb
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.mp h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - a).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [← add_one_le_iff, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_comm _ (1 : ℤ), ← add_assoc] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - (a + 1)).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha, ← add_one_le_iff, sub_add, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact ⟨sub_le_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [sub_sub, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - (a + 1)).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha, sub_sub]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
variable (a b : ℤ)
theorem Icc_eq_finset_map :
Icc a b =
(Finset.range (b + 1 - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a) :=
rfl
#align int.Icc_eq_finset_map Int.Icc_eq_finset_map
theorem Ico_eq_finset_map :
Ico a b = (Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a) :=
rfl
#align int.Ico_eq_finset_map Int.Ico_eq_finset_map
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_map :
Ioc a b =
(Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)) :=
rfl
#align int.Ioc_eq_finset_map Int.Ioc_eq_finset_map
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_map :
Ioo a b =
(Finset.range (b - a - 1).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)) :=
rfl
#align int.Ioo_eq_finset_map Int.Ioo_eq_finset_map
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_map :
uIcc a b = (range (max a b + 1 - min a b).toNat).map
(Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding <| min a b) := rfl
#align int.uIcc_eq_finset_map Int.uIcc_eq_finset_map
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : (Icc a b).card = (b + 1 - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
#align int.card_Icc Int.card_Icc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : (Ico a b).card = (b - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
#align int.card_Ico Int.card_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : (Ioc a b).card = (b - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
#align int.card_Ioc Int.card_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : (Ioo a b).card = (b - a - 1).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
#align int.card_Ioo Int.card_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : (uIcc a b).card = (b - a).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_map _).trans <|
Int.ofNat.inj <| by
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Restore `int.coe_nat_inj` and remove the `change`
change ((↑) : ℕ → ℤ) _ = ((↑) : ℕ → ℤ) _
rw [card_range, sup_eq_max, inf_eq_min,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le <| le_add_one min_le_max), Int.ofNat_add,
Int.natCast_natAbs, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, max_sub_min_eq_abs, add_comm, Int.ofNat_one]
#align int.card_uIcc Int.card_uIcc
theorem card_Icc_of_le (h : a ≤ b + 1) : ((Icc a b).card : ℤ) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [card_Icc, toNat_sub_of_le h]
#align int.card_Icc_of_le Int.card_Icc_of_le
theorem card_Ico_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : ((Ico a b).card : ℤ) = b - a := by
rw [card_Ico, toNat_sub_of_le h]
#align int.card_Ico_of_le Int.card_Ico_of_le
theorem card_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : ((Ioc a b).card : ℤ) = b - a := by
rw [card_Ioc, toNat_sub_of_le h]
#align int.card_Ioc_of_le Int.card_Ioc_of_le
theorem card_Ioo_of_lt (h : a < b) : ((Ioo a b).card : ℤ) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [card_Ioo, sub_sub, toNat_sub_of_le h]
#align int.card_Ioo_of_lt Int.card_Ioo_of_lt
-- Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it
theorem card_fintype_Icc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = (b + 1 - a).toNat := by
rw [← card_Icc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align int.card_fintype_Icc Int.card_fintype_Icc
-- Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it
theorem card_fintype_Ico : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = (b - a).toNat := by
rw [← card_Ico, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align int.card_fintype_Ico Int.card_fintype_Ico
-- Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it
theorem card_fintype_Ioc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = (b - a).toNat := by
rw [← card_Ioc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align int.card_fintype_Ioc Int.card_fintype_Ioc
-- Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it
theorem card_fintype_Ioo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = (b - a - 1).toNat := by
rw [← card_Ioo, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align int.card_fintype_Ioo Int.card_fintype_Ioo
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Interval.lean | 169 | 170 | theorem card_fintype_uIcc : Fintype.card (Set.uIcc a b) = (b - a).natAbs + 1 := by |
rw [← card_uIcc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FormalMultilinearSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
#align_import analysis.analytic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Analytic functions
A function is analytic in one dimension around `0` if it can be written as a converging power series
`Σ pₙ zⁿ`. This definition can be extended to any dimension (even in infinite dimension) by
requiring that `pₙ` is a continuous `n`-multilinear map. In general, `pₙ` is not unique (in two
dimensions, taking `p₂ (x, y) (x', y') = x y'` or `y x'` gives the same map when applied to a
vector `(x, y) (x, y)`). A way to guarantee uniqueness is to take a symmetric `pₙ`, but this is not
always possible in nonzero characteristic (in characteristic 2, the previous example has no
symmetric representative). Therefore, we do not insist on symmetry or uniqueness in the definition,
and we only require the existence of a converging series.
The general framework is important to say that the exponential map on bounded operators on a Banach
space is analytic, as well as the inverse on invertible operators.
## Main definitions
Let `p` be a formal multilinear series from `E` to `F`, i.e., `p n` is a multilinear map on `E^n`
for `n : ℕ`.
* `p.radius`: the largest `r : ℝ≥0∞` such that `‖p n‖ * r^n` grows subexponentially.
* `p.le_radius_of_bound`, `p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal`, `p.le_radius_of_isBigO`: if `‖p n‖ * r ^ n`
is bounded above, then `r ≤ p.radius`;
* `p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius`, `p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius`,
`p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius`,
`p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`, `p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`: if `r < p.radius`, then
`‖p n‖ * r ^ n` tends to zero exponentially;
* `p.lt_radius_of_isBigO`: if `r ≠ 0` and `‖p n‖ * r ^ n = O(a ^ n)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then
`r < p.radius`;
* `p.partialSum n x`: the sum `∑_{i = 0}^{n-1} pᵢ xⁱ`.
* `p.sum x`: the sum `∑'_{i = 0}^{∞} pᵢ xⁱ`.
Additionally, let `f` be a function from `E` to `F`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`: on the ball of center `x` with radius `r`,
`f (x + y) = ∑'_n pₙ yⁿ`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`: on some ball of center `x` with positive radius, holds
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`.
* `AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x`: there exists a power series `p` such that holds `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`.
* `AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s`: the function `f` is analytic at every point of `s`.
We develop the basic properties of these notions, notably:
* If a function admits a power series, it is continuous (see
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.continuousOn` and `HasFPowerSeriesAt.continuousAt` and
`AnalyticAt.continuousAt`).
* In a complete space, the sum of a formal power series with positive radius is well defined on the
disk of convergence, see `FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`.
* If a function admits a power series in a ball, then it is analytic at any point `y` of this ball,
and the power series there can be expressed in terms of the initial power series `p` as
`p.changeOrigin y`. See `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.changeOrigin`. It follows in particular that
the set of points at which a given function is analytic is open, see `isOpen_analyticAt`.
## Implementation details
We only introduce the radius of convergence of a power series, as `p.radius`.
For a power series in finitely many dimensions, there is a finer (directional, coordinate-dependent)
notion, describing the polydisk of convergence. This notion is more specific, and not necessary to
build the general theory. We do not define it here.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter ENNReal
open Set Filter Asymptotics
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [Ring 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
variable [TopologicalAddGroup E] [TopologicalAddGroup F]
variable [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.sum x` is the sum `Σ pₙ xⁿ`. A
priori, it only behaves well when `‖x‖ < p.radius`. -/
protected def sum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) : F :=
∑' n : ℕ, p n fun _ => x
#align formal_multilinear_series.sum FormalMultilinearSeries.sum
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.partialSum n x` is the sum
`Σ pₖ xᵏ` for `k ∈ {0,..., n-1}`. -/
def partialSum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) (x : E) : F :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, p k fun _ : Fin k => x
#align formal_multilinear_series.partial_sum FormalMultilinearSeries.partialSum
/-- The partial sums of a formal multilinear series are continuous. -/
theorem partialSum_continuous (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
Continuous (p.partialSum n) := by
unfold partialSum -- Porting note: added
continuity
#align formal_multilinear_series.partial_sum_continuous FormalMultilinearSeries.partialSum_continuous
end FormalMultilinearSeries
/-! ### The radius of a formal multilinear series -/
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
/-- The radius of a formal multilinear series is the largest `r` such that the sum `Σ ‖pₙ‖ ‖y‖ⁿ`
converges for all `‖y‖ < r`. This implies that `Σ pₙ yⁿ` converges for all `‖y‖ < r`, but these
definitions are *not* equivalent in general. -/
def radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0) (C : ℝ) (_ : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C), (r : ℝ≥0∞)
#align formal_multilinear_series.radius FormalMultilinearSeries.radius
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound (C : ℝ) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
le_iSup_of_le r <| le_iSup_of_le C <| le_iSup (fun _ => (r : ℝ≥0∞)) h
#align formal_multilinear_series.le_radius_of_bound FormalMultilinearSeries.le_radius_of_bound
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (C : ℝ≥0) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => mod_cast h n
#align formal_multilinear_series.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal FormalMultilinearSeries.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(1)`, as `n → ∞`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_isBigO (h : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
Exists.elim (isBigO_one_nat_atTop_iff.1 h) fun C hC =>
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (hC n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align formal_multilinear_series.le_radius_of_is_O FormalMultilinearSeries.le_radius_of_isBigO
theorem le_radius_of_eventually_le (C) (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO <| IsBigO.of_bound C <| h.mono fun n hn => by simpa
#align formal_multilinear_series.le_radius_of_eventually_le FormalMultilinearSeries.le_radius_of_eventually_le
theorem le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (∑' n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) fun _ => le_tsum' h _
#align formal_multilinear_series.le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm FormalMultilinearSeries.le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm
theorem le_radius_of_summable (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm <| by
simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at h
exact mod_cast h
#align formal_multilinear_series.le_radius_of_summable FormalMultilinearSeries.le_radius_of_summable
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO
(h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h r)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align formal_multilinear_series.radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_is_O FormalMultilinearSeries.radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO
theorem radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, p n = 0) : p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO fun r =>
(isBigO_zero _ _).congr' (h.mono fun n hn => by simp [hn]) EventuallyEq.rfl
#align formal_multilinear_series.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero FormalMultilinearSeries.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ m, p (m + n) = 0) :
p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero <|
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n, fun _ hk => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hk ▸ hn _⟩
#align formal_multilinear_series.radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero FormalMultilinearSeries.radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius {v : F} :
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius = ⊤ :=
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 1
(by simp [constFormalMultilinearSeries])
#align formal_multilinear_series.const_formal_multilinear_series_radius FormalMultilinearSeries.constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1`, `‖p n‖ rⁿ = o(aⁿ)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (a ^ ·) := by
have := (TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4
rw [this]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [(TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4]
simp only [radius, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨t, C, hC, rt⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at rt
have : 0 < (t : ℝ) := r.coe_nonneg.trans_lt rt
rw [← div_lt_one this] at rt
refine ⟨_, rt, C, Or.inr zero_lt_one, fun n => ?_⟩
calc
|‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n| = ‖p n‖ * (t : ℝ) ^ n * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by
field_simp [mul_right_comm, abs_mul]
_ ≤ C * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by gcongr; apply hC
#align formal_multilinear_series.is_o_of_lt_radius FormalMultilinearSeries.isLittleO_of_lt_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = o(1)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
(fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (fun _ => 1 : ℕ → ℝ) :=
let ⟨_, ha, hp⟩ := p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h
hp.trans <| (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left ha.1.le ha.2).congr (fun _ => rfl) one_pow
#align formal_multilinear_series.is_o_one_of_lt_radius FormalMultilinearSeries.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1` and `C > 0`, `‖p n‖ * r ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n`. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n := by
-- Porting note: moved out of `rcases`
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 5).mp
(p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h)
rcases this with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, H⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, C, hC, fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (H n)⟩
#align formal_multilinear_series.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius FormalMultilinearSeries.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius
/-- If `r ≠ 0` and `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(aⁿ)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then `r < p.radius`. -/
theorem lt_radius_of_isBigO (h₀ : r ≠ 0) {a : ℝ} (ha : a ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1)
(hp : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] (a ^ ·)) : ↑r < p.radius := by
-- Porting note: moved out of `rcases`
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 2 5)
rcases this.mp ⟨a, ha, hp⟩ with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, hp⟩
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero, ← NNReal.coe_pos] at h₀
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.1.le
have : (r : ℝ) < r / a := by
simpa only [div_one] using (div_lt_div_left h₀ zero_lt_one ha.1).2 ha.2
norm_cast at this
rw [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe] at this
refine this.trans_le (p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => ?_)
rw [NNReal.coe_div, div_pow, ← mul_div_assoc, div_le_iff (pow_pos ha.1 n)]
exact (le_abs_self _).trans (hp n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align formal_multilinear_series.lt_radius_of_is_O FormalMultilinearSeries.lt_radius_of_isBigO
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C :=
let ⟨_, ha, C, hC, h⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius h
⟨C, hC, fun n => (h n).trans <| mul_le_of_le_one_right hC.lt.le (pow_le_one _ ha.1.le ha.2.le)⟩
#align formal_multilinear_series.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius FormalMultilinearSeries.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem norm_le_div_pow_of_pos_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h0 : 0 < r) (h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ ≤ C / (r : ℝ) ^ n :=
let ⟨C, hC, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius h
⟨C, hC, fun n => Iff.mpr (le_div_iff (pow_pos h0 _)) (hp n)⟩
#align formal_multilinear_series.norm_le_div_pow_of_pos_of_lt_radius FormalMultilinearSeries.norm_le_div_pow_of_pos_of_lt_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C :=
let ⟨C, hC, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius h
⟨⟨C, hC.lt.le⟩, hC, mod_cast hp⟩
#align formal_multilinear_series.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius FormalMultilinearSeries.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius
theorem le_radius_of_tendsto (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {l : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) atTop (𝓝 l)) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h.isBigO_one _)
#align formal_multilinear_series.le_radius_of_tendsto FormalMultilinearSeries.le_radius_of_tendsto
theorem le_radius_of_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(hs : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_tendsto hs.tendsto_atTop_zero
#align formal_multilinear_series.le_radius_of_summable_norm FormalMultilinearSeries.le_radius_of_summable_norm
theorem not_summable_norm_of_radius_lt_nnnorm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(h : p.radius < ‖x‖₊) : ¬Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * ‖x‖ ^ n :=
fun hs => not_le_of_lt h (p.le_radius_of_summable_norm hs)
#align formal_multilinear_series.not_summable_norm_of_radius_lt_nnnorm FormalMultilinearSeries.not_summable_norm_of_radius_lt_nnnorm
theorem summable_norm_mul_pow (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n := by
obtain ⟨a, ha : a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, C, - : 0 < C, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius h
exact .of_nonneg_of_le (fun n => mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg r.coe_nonneg _))
hp ((summable_geometric_of_lt_one ha.1.le ha.2).mul_left _)
#align formal_multilinear_series.summable_norm_mul_pow FormalMultilinearSeries.summable_norm_mul_pow
theorem summable_norm_apply (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) p.radius) : Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n fun _ => x‖ := by
rw [mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff] at hx
refine .of_nonneg_of_le
(fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _) (fun n ↦ ((p n).le_opNorm _).trans_eq ?_) (p.summable_norm_mul_pow hx)
simp
#align formal_multilinear_series.summable_norm_apply FormalMultilinearSeries.summable_norm_apply
theorem summable_nnnorm_mul_pow (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n := by
rw [← NNReal.summable_coe]
push_cast
exact p.summable_norm_mul_pow h
#align formal_multilinear_series.summable_nnnorm_mul_pow FormalMultilinearSeries.summable_nnnorm_mul_pow
protected theorem summable [CompleteSpace F] (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) p.radius) : Summable fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => x :=
(p.summable_norm_apply hx).of_norm
#align formal_multilinear_series.summable FormalMultilinearSeries.summable
theorem radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(hs : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_summable_norm (hs r)
#align formal_multilinear_series.radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm FormalMultilinearSeries.radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Basic.lean | 309 | 319 | theorem radius_eq_top_iff_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
p.radius = ∞ ↔ ∀ r : ℝ≥0, Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n := by |
constructor
· intro h r
obtain ⟨a, ha : a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, C, - : 0 < C, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius
(show (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius from h.symm ▸ ENNReal.coe_lt_top)
refine .of_norm_bounded
(fun n ↦ (C : ℝ) * a ^ n) ((summable_geometric_of_lt_one ha.1.le ha.2).mul_left _) fun n ↦ ?_
specialize hp n
rwa [Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg r.coe_nonneg n))]
· exact p.radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Homology
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
#align_import algebra.homology.opposite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8c75ef3517d4106e89fe524e6281d0b0545f47fc"
/-!
# Opposite categories of complexes
Given a preadditive category `V`, the opposite of its category of chain complexes is equivalent to
the category of cochain complexes of objects in `Vᵒᵖ`. We define this equivalence, and another
analogous equivalence (for a general category of homological complexes with a general
complex shape).
We then show that when `V` is abelian, if `C` is a homological complex, then the homology of
`op(C)` is isomorphic to `op` of the homology of `C` (and the analogous result for `unop`).
## Implementation notes
It is convenient to define both `op` and `opSymm`; this is because given a complex shape `c`,
`c.symm.symm` is not defeq to `c`.
## Tags
opposite, chain complex, cochain complex, homology, cohomology, homological complex
-/
noncomputable section
open Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
section
variable {V : Type*} [Category V] [Abelian V]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Opposite.lean | 40 | 50 | theorem imageToKernel_op {X Y Z : V} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel g.op f.op (by rw [← op_comp, w, op_zero]) =
(imageSubobjectIso _ ≪≫ (imageOpOp _).symm).hom ≫
(cokernel.desc f (factorThruImage g)
(by rw [← cancel_mono (image.ι g), Category.assoc, image.fac, w, zero_comp])).op ≫
(kernelSubobjectIso _ ≪≫ kernelOpOp _).inv := by |
ext
simp only [Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom, Iso.trans_inv, kernelOpOp_inv, Category.assoc,
imageToKernel_arrow, kernelSubobject_arrow', kernel.lift_ι, ← op_comp, cokernel.π_desc,
← imageSubobject_arrow, ← imageUnopOp_inv_comp_op_factorThruImage g.op]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
#align_import category_theory.limits.preserves.shapes.biproducts from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Preservation of biproducts
We define the image of a (binary) bicone under a functor that preserves zero morphisms and define
classes `PreservesBiproduct` and `PreservesBinaryBiproduct`. We then
* show that a functor that preserves biproducts of a two-element type preserves binary biproducts,
* construct the comparison morphisms between the image of a biproduct and the biproduct of the
images and show that the biproduct is preserved if one of them is an isomorphism,
* give the canonical isomorphism between the image of a biproduct and the biproduct of the images
in case that the biproduct is preserved.
-/
universe w₁ w₂ v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
section HasZeroMorphisms
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
namespace Functor
section Map
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
section Bicone
variable {J : Type w₁}
/-- The image of a bicone under a functor. -/
@[simps]
def mapBicone {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f) : Bicone (F.obj ∘ f) where
pt := F.obj b.pt
π j := F.map (b.π j)
ι j := F.map (b.ι j)
ι_π j j' := by
rw [← F.map_comp]
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp only [bicone_ι_π_self, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id, eqToHom_refl]; dsimp
· rw [bicone_ι_π_ne _ h, F.map_zero]
#align category_theory.functor.map_bicone CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBicone
theorem mapBicone_whisker {K : Type w₂} {g : K ≃ J} {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) :
F.mapBicone (c.whisker g) = (F.mapBicone c).whisker g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.functor.map_bicone_whisker CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBicone_whisker
end Bicone
/-- The image of a binary bicone under a functor. -/
@[simps!]
def mapBinaryBicone {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y) : BinaryBicone (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
(BinaryBicones.functoriality _ _ F).obj b
#align category_theory.functor.map_binary_bicone CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBinaryBicone
end Map
end Functor
open CategoryTheory.Functor
namespace Limits
section Bicone
variable {J : Type w₁} {K : Type w₂}
/-- A functor `F` preserves biproducts of `f` if `F` maps every bilimit bicone over `f` to a
bilimit bicone over `F.obj ∘ f`. -/
class PreservesBiproduct (f : J → C) (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] where
preserves : ∀ {b : Bicone f}, b.IsBilimit → (F.mapBicone b).IsBilimit
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesBiproduct
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBiproduct] PreservesBiproduct.preserves
/-- A functor `F` preserves biproducts of `f` if `F` maps every bilimit bicone over `f` to a
bilimit bicone over `F.obj ∘ f`. -/
def isBilimitOfPreserves {f : J → C} (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [PreservesBiproduct f F]
{b : Bicone f} (hb : b.IsBilimit) : (F.mapBicone b).IsBilimit :=
PreservesBiproduct.preserves hb
#align category_theory.limits.is_bilimit_of_preserves CategoryTheory.Limits.isBilimitOfPreserves
variable (J)
/-- A functor `F` preserves biproducts of shape `J` if it preserves biproducts of `f` for every
`f : J → C`. -/
class PreservesBiproductsOfShape (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] where
preserves : ∀ {f : J → C}, PreservesBiproduct f F
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_biproducts_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesBiproductsOfShape
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBiproductsOfShape] PreservesBiproductsOfShape.preserves
attribute [instance 100] PreservesBiproductsOfShape.preserves
end Bicone
/-- A functor `F` preserves finite biproducts if it preserves biproducts of shape `J` whenever
`J` is a fintype. -/
class PreservesFiniteBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] where
preserves : ∀ {J : Type} [Fintype J], PreservesBiproductsOfShape J F
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_finite_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesFiniteBiproducts
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesFiniteBiproducts] PreservesFiniteBiproducts.preserves
attribute [instance 100] PreservesFiniteBiproducts.preserves
/-- A functor `F` preserves biproducts if it preserves biproducts of any shape `J` of size `w`.
The usual notion of preservation of biproducts is recovered by choosing `w` to be the universe
of the morphisms of `C`. -/
class PreservesBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] where
preserves : ∀ {J : Type w₁}, PreservesBiproductsOfShape J F
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesBiproducts
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBiproducts] PreservesBiproducts.preserves
attribute [instance 100] PreservesBiproducts.preserves
/-- Preserving biproducts at a bigger universe level implies preserving biproducts at a
smaller universe level. -/
def preservesBiproductsShrink (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
[PreservesBiproducts.{max w₁ w₂} F] : PreservesBiproducts.{w₁} F :=
⟨fun {_} =>
⟨fun {_} =>
⟨fun {b} ib =>
((F.mapBicone b).whiskerIsBilimitIff _).toFun
(isBilimitOfPreserves F ((b.whiskerIsBilimitIff Equiv.ulift.{w₂}).invFun ib))⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_biproducts_shrink CategoryTheory.Limits.preservesBiproductsShrink
instance (priority := 100) preservesFiniteBiproductsOfPreservesBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D)
[PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [PreservesBiproducts.{w₁} F] : PreservesFiniteBiproducts F where
preserves {J} _ := by letI := preservesBiproductsShrink.{0} F; infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_finite_biproducts_of_preserves_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.preservesFiniteBiproductsOfPreservesBiproducts
/-- A functor `F` preserves binary biproducts of `X` and `Y` if `F` maps every bilimit bicone over
`X` and `Y` to a bilimit bicone over `F.obj X` and `F.obj Y`. -/
class PreservesBinaryBiproduct (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] where
preserves : ∀ {b : BinaryBicone X Y}, b.IsBilimit → (F.mapBinaryBicone b).IsBilimit
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_binary_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesBinaryBiproduct
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBinaryBiproduct] PreservesBinaryBiproduct.preserves
/-- A functor `F` preserves binary biproducts of `X` and `Y` if `F` maps every bilimit bicone over
`X` and `Y` to a bilimit bicone over `F.obj X` and `F.obj Y`. -/
def isBinaryBilimitOfPreserves {X Y : C} (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
[PreservesBinaryBiproduct X Y F] {b : BinaryBicone X Y} (hb : b.IsBilimit) :
(F.mapBinaryBicone b).IsBilimit :=
PreservesBinaryBiproduct.preserves hb
#align category_theory.limits.is_binary_bilimit_of_preserves CategoryTheory.Limits.isBinaryBilimitOfPreserves
/-- A functor `F` preserves binary biproducts if it preserves the binary biproduct of `X` and `Y`
for all `X` and `Y`. -/
class PreservesBinaryBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] where
preserves : ∀ {X Y : C}, PreservesBinaryBiproduct X Y F := by infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_binary_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesBinaryBiproducts
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBinaryBiproducts] PreservesBinaryBiproducts.preserves
/-- A functor that preserves biproducts of a pair preserves binary biproducts. -/
def preservesBinaryBiproductOfPreservesBiproduct (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] (X Y : C)
[PreservesBiproduct (pairFunction X Y) F] : PreservesBinaryBiproduct X Y F where
preserves {b} hb :=
{ isLimit :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit
((IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoPair _) _).symm
(isBilimitOfPreserves F (b.toBiconeIsBilimit.symm hb)).isLimit) <|
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp
isColimit :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit
((IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv (diagramIsoPair _) _).symm
(isBilimitOfPreserves F (b.toBiconeIsBilimit.symm hb)).isColimit) <|
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_binary_biproduct_of_preserves_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.preservesBinaryBiproductOfPreservesBiproduct
/-- A functor that preserves biproducts of a pair preserves binary biproducts. -/
def preservesBinaryBiproductsOfPreservesBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
[PreservesBiproductsOfShape WalkingPair F] : PreservesBinaryBiproducts F where
preserves {X} Y := preservesBinaryBiproductOfPreservesBiproduct F X Y
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_binary_biproducts_of_preserves_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.preservesBinaryBiproductsOfPreservesBiproducts
attribute [instance 100] PreservesBinaryBiproducts.preserves
end Limits
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace Functor
section Bicone
variable {J : Type w₁} (F : C ⥤ D) (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f]
section
variable [HasBiproduct (F.obj ∘ f)]
/-- As for products, any functor between categories with biproducts gives rise to a morphism
`F.obj (⨁ f) ⟶ ⨁ (F.obj ∘ f)`. -/
def biproductComparison : F.obj (⨁ f) ⟶ ⨁ F.obj ∘ f :=
biproduct.lift fun j => F.map (biproduct.π f j)
#align category_theory.functor.biproduct_comparison CategoryTheory.Functor.biproductComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproductComparison_π (j : J) :
biproductComparison F f ≫ biproduct.π _ j = F.map (biproduct.π f j) :=
biproduct.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.functor.biproduct_comparison_π CategoryTheory.Functor.biproductComparison_π
/-- As for coproducts, any functor between categories with biproducts gives rise to a morphism
`⨁ (F.obj ∘ f) ⟶ F.obj (⨁ f)` -/
def biproductComparison' : ⨁ F.obj ∘ f ⟶ F.obj (⨁ f) :=
biproduct.desc fun j => F.map (biproduct.ι f j)
#align category_theory.functor.biproduct_comparison' CategoryTheory.Functor.biproductComparison'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_biproductComparison' (j : J) :
biproduct.ι _ j ≫ biproductComparison' F f = F.map (biproduct.ι f j) :=
biproduct.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.functor.ι_biproduct_comparison' CategoryTheory.Functor.ι_biproductComparison'
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
/-- The composition in the opposite direction is equal to the identity if and only if `F` preserves
the biproduct, see `preservesBiproduct_of_monoBiproductComparison`. -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproductComparison'_comp_biproductComparison :
biproductComparison' F f ≫ biproductComparison F f = 𝟙 (⨁ F.obj ∘ f) := by
classical
ext
simp [biproduct.ι_π, ← Functor.map_comp, eqToHom_map]
#align category_theory.functor.biproduct_comparison'_comp_biproduct_comparison CategoryTheory.Functor.biproductComparison'_comp_biproductComparison
/-- `biproduct_comparison F f` is a split epimorphism. -/
@[simps]
def splitEpiBiproductComparison : SplitEpi (biproductComparison F f) where
section_ := biproductComparison' F f
id := by aesop
#align category_theory.functor.split_epi_biproduct_comparison CategoryTheory.Functor.splitEpiBiproductComparison
instance : IsSplitEpi (biproductComparison F f) :=
IsSplitEpi.mk' (splitEpiBiproductComparison F f)
/-- `biproduct_comparison' F f` is a split monomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def splitMonoBiproductComparison' : SplitMono (biproductComparison' F f) where
retraction := biproductComparison F f
id := by aesop
#align category_theory.functor.split_mono_biproduct_comparison' CategoryTheory.Functor.splitMonoBiproductComparison'
instance : IsSplitMono (biproductComparison' F f) :=
IsSplitMono.mk' (splitMonoBiproductComparison' F f)
end
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [PreservesBiproduct f F]
instance hasBiproduct_of_preserves : HasBiproduct (F.obj ∘ f) :=
HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := F.mapBicone (biproduct.bicone f)
isBilimit := PreservesBiproduct.preserves (biproduct.isBilimit _) }
#align category_theory.functor.has_biproduct_of_preserves CategoryTheory.Functor.hasBiproduct_of_preserves
/-- If `F` preserves a biproduct, we get a definitionally nice isomorphism
`F.obj (⨁ f) ≅ ⨁ (F.obj ∘ f)`. -/
@[simp]
def mapBiproduct : F.obj (⨁ f) ≅ ⨁ F.obj ∘ f :=
biproduct.uniqueUpToIso _ (PreservesBiproduct.preserves (biproduct.isBilimit _))
#align category_theory.functor.map_biproduct CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBiproduct
theorem mapBiproduct_hom :
haveI : HasBiproduct fun j => F.obj (f j) := hasBiproduct_of_preserves F f
(mapBiproduct F f).hom = biproduct.lift fun j => F.map (biproduct.π f j) := rfl
#align category_theory.functor.map_biproduct_hom CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBiproduct_hom
theorem mapBiproduct_inv :
haveI : HasBiproduct fun j => F.obj (f j) := hasBiproduct_of_preserves F f
(mapBiproduct F f).inv = biproduct.desc fun j => F.map (biproduct.ι f j) := rfl
#align category_theory.functor.map_biproduct_inv CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBiproduct_inv
end Bicone
variable (F : C ⥤ D) (X Y : C) [HasBinaryBiproduct X Y]
section
variable [HasBinaryBiproduct (F.obj X) (F.obj Y)]
/-- As for products, any functor between categories with binary biproducts gives rise to a
morphism `F.obj (X ⊞ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y`. -/
def biprodComparison : F.obj (X ⊞ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y :=
biprod.lift (F.map biprod.fst) (F.map biprod.snd)
#align category_theory.functor.biprod_comparison CategoryTheory.Functor.biprodComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biprodComparison_fst : biprodComparison F X Y ≫ biprod.fst = F.map biprod.fst :=
biprod.lift_fst _ _
#align category_theory.functor.biprod_comparison_fst CategoryTheory.Functor.biprodComparison_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biprodComparison_snd : biprodComparison F X Y ≫ biprod.snd = F.map biprod.snd :=
biprod.lift_snd _ _
#align category_theory.functor.biprod_comparison_snd CategoryTheory.Functor.biprodComparison_snd
/-- As for coproducts, any functor between categories with binary biproducts gives rise to a
morphism `F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊞ Y)`. -/
def biprodComparison' : F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊞ Y) :=
biprod.desc (F.map biprod.inl) (F.map biprod.inr)
#align category_theory.functor.biprod_comparison' CategoryTheory.Functor.biprodComparison'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_biprodComparison' : biprod.inl ≫ biprodComparison' F X Y = F.map biprod.inl :=
biprod.inl_desc _ _
#align category_theory.functor.inl_biprod_comparison' CategoryTheory.Functor.inl_biprodComparison'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_biprodComparison' : biprod.inr ≫ biprodComparison' F X Y = F.map biprod.inr :=
biprod.inr_desc _ _
#align category_theory.functor.inr_biprod_comparison' CategoryTheory.Functor.inr_biprodComparison'
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
/-- The composition in the opposite direction is equal to the identity if and only if `F` preserves
the biproduct, see `preservesBinaryBiproduct_of_monoBiprodComparison`. -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biprodComparison'_comp_biprodComparison :
biprodComparison' F X Y ≫ biprodComparison F X Y = 𝟙 (F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y) := by
ext <;> simp [← Functor.map_comp]
#align category_theory.functor.biprod_comparison'_comp_biprod_comparison CategoryTheory.Functor.biprodComparison'_comp_biprodComparison
/-- `biprodComparison F X Y` is a split epi. -/
@[simps]
def splitEpiBiprodComparison : SplitEpi (biprodComparison F X Y) where
section_ := biprodComparison' F X Y
id := by aesop
#align category_theory.functor.split_epi_biprod_comparison CategoryTheory.Functor.splitEpiBiprodComparison
instance : IsSplitEpi (biprodComparison F X Y) :=
IsSplitEpi.mk' (splitEpiBiprodComparison F X Y)
/-- `biprodComparison' F X Y` is a split mono. -/
@[simps]
def splitMonoBiprodComparison' : SplitMono (biprodComparison' F X Y) where
retraction := biprodComparison F X Y
id := by aesop
#align category_theory.functor.split_mono_biprod_comparison' CategoryTheory.Functor.splitMonoBiprodComparison'
instance : IsSplitMono (biprodComparison' F X Y) :=
IsSplitMono.mk' (splitMonoBiprodComparison' F X Y)
end
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [PreservesBinaryBiproduct X Y F]
instance hasBinaryBiproduct_of_preserves : HasBinaryBiproduct (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := F.mapBinaryBicone (BinaryBiproduct.bicone X Y)
isBilimit := PreservesBinaryBiproduct.preserves (BinaryBiproduct.isBilimit _ _) }
#align category_theory.functor.has_binary_biproduct_of_preserves CategoryTheory.Functor.hasBinaryBiproduct_of_preserves
/-- If `F` preserves a binary biproduct, we get a definitionally nice isomorphism
`F.obj (X ⊞ Y) ≅ F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y`. -/
@[simp]
def mapBiprod : F.obj (X ⊞ Y) ≅ F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y :=
biprod.uniqueUpToIso _ _ (PreservesBinaryBiproduct.preserves (BinaryBiproduct.isBilimit _ _))
#align category_theory.functor.map_biprod CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBiprod
theorem mapBiprod_hom : (mapBiprod F X Y).hom = biprod.lift (F.map biprod.fst) (F.map biprod.snd) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.functor.map_biprod_hom CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBiprod_hom
theorem mapBiprod_inv : (mapBiprod F X Y).inv = biprod.desc (F.map biprod.inl) (F.map biprod.inr) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.functor.map_biprod_inv CategoryTheory.Functor.mapBiprod_inv
end Functor
namespace Limits
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
section Bicone
variable {J : Type w₁} (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] [PreservesBiproduct f F] {W : C}
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Biproducts.lean | 409 | 416 | theorem biproduct.map_lift_mapBiprod (g : ∀ j, W ⟶ f j) :
-- Porting note: twice we need haveI to tell Lean about hasBiproduct_of_preserves F f
haveI : HasBiproduct fun j => F.obj (f j) := hasBiproduct_of_preserves F f
F.map (biproduct.lift g) ≫ (F.mapBiproduct f).hom = biproduct.lift fun j => F.map (g j) := by |
ext j
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
haveI : HasBiproduct fun j => F.obj (f j) := hasBiproduct_of_preserves F f
simp only [mapBiproduct_hom, Category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, ← F.map_comp]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attr
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.FinsetOps
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.finset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Finite sets
Terms of type `Finset α` are one way of talking about finite subsets of `α` in mathlib.
Below, `Finset α` is defined as a structure with 2 fields:
1. `val` is a `Multiset α` of elements;
2. `nodup` is a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
Finsets in Lean are constructive in that they have an underlying `List` that enumerates their
elements. In particular, any function that uses the data of the underlying list cannot depend on its
ordering. This is handled on the `Multiset` level by multiset API, so in most cases one needn't
worry about it explicitly.
Finsets give a basic foundation for defining finite sums and products over types:
1. `∑ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`;
2. `∏ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`.
Lean refers to these operations as big operators.
More information can be found in `Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset`.
Finsets are directly used to define fintypes in Lean.
A `Fintype α` instance for a type `α` consists of a universal `Finset α` containing every term of
`α`, called `univ`. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
There is also `univ'`, the noncomputable partner to `univ`,
which is defined to be `α` as a finset if `α` is finite,
and the empty finset otherwise. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
`Finset.card`, the size of a finset is defined in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card`.
This is then used to define `Fintype.card`, the size of a type.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset`: Defines a type for the finite subsets of `α`.
Constructing a `Finset` requires two pieces of data: `val`, a `Multiset α` of elements,
and `nodup`, a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
* `Finset.instMembershipFinset`: Defines membership `a ∈ (s : Finset α)`.
* `Finset.instCoeTCFinsetSet`: Provides a coercion `s : Finset α` to `s : Set α`.
* `Finset.instCoeSortFinsetType`: Coerce `s : Finset α` to the type of all `x ∈ s`.
* `Finset.induction_on`: Induction on finsets. To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty finset, and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the finset obtained by inserting a new element.
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Finset constructions
* `Finset.instSingletonFinset`: Denoted by `{a}`; the finset consisting of one element.
* `Finset.empty`: Denoted by `∅`. The finset associated to any type consisting of no elements.
* `Finset.range`: For any `n : ℕ`, `range n` is equal to `{0, 1, ... , n - 1} ⊆ ℕ`.
This convention is consistent with other languages and normalizes `card (range n) = n`.
Beware, `n` is not in `range n`.
* `Finset.attach`: Given `s : Finset α`, `attach s` forms a finset of elements of the subtype
`{a // a ∈ s}`; in other words, it attaches elements to a proof of membership in the set.
### Finsets from functions
* `Finset.filter`: Given a decidable predicate `p : α → Prop`, `s.filter p` is
the finset consisting of those elements in `s` satisfying the predicate `p`.
### The lattice structure on subsets of finsets
There is a natural lattice structure on the subsets of a set.
In Lean, we use lattice notation to talk about things involving unions and intersections. See
`Mathlib.Order.Lattice`. For the lattice structure on finsets, `⊥` is called `bot` with `⊥ = ∅` and
`⊤` is called `top` with `⊤ = univ`.
* `Finset.instHasSubsetFinset`: Lots of API about lattices, otherwise behaves as one would expect.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: Defines `s ∪ t` (or `s ⊔ t`) as the union of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.sup`/`Finset.biUnion` for finite unions.
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: Defines `s ∩ t` (or `s ⊓ t`) as the intersection of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.inf` for finite intersections.
### Operations on two or more finsets
* `insert` and `Finset.cons`: For any `a : α`, `insert s a` returns `s ∪ {a}`. `cons s a h`
returns the same except that it requires a hypothesis stating that `a` is not already in `s`.
This does not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.erase`: For any `a : α`, `erase s a` returns `s` with the element `a` removed.
* `Finset.instSDiffFinset`: Defines the set difference `s \ t` for finsets `s` and `t`.
* `Finset.product`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of `α × β`.
For arbitrary dependent products, see `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi`.
### Predicates on finsets
* `Disjoint`: defined via the lattice structure on finsets; two sets are disjoint if their
intersection is empty.
* `Finset.Nonempty`: A finset is nonempty if it has elements. This is equivalent to saying `s ≠ ∅`.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib.Data.Equiv` files describe a general type of equivalence, so look in there for any
lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that `s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen
assert_not_exists Multiset.Powerset
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Multiset Subtype Nat Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure Finset (α : Type*) where
/-- The underlying multiset -/
val : Multiset α
/-- `val` contains no duplicates -/
nodup : Nodup val
#align finset Finset
instance Multiset.canLiftFinset {α} : CanLift (Multiset α) (Finset α) Finset.val Multiset.Nodup :=
⟨fun m hm => ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
#align multiset.can_lift_finset Multiset.canLiftFinset
namespace Finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : Finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩, ⟨t, _⟩, h => by cases h; rfl
#align finset.eq_of_veq Finset.eq_of_veq
theorem val_injective : Injective (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ => eq_of_veq
#align finset.val_injective Finset.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem val_inj {s t : Finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
val_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.val_inj Finset.val_inj
@[simp]
theorem dedup_eq_self [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : dedup s.1 = s.1 :=
s.2.dedup
#align finset.dedup_eq_self Finset.dedup_eq_self
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Finset α)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
#align finset.has_decidable_eq Finset.decidableEq
/-! ### membership -/
instance : Membership α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_def Finset.mem_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_val {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s.1 ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_val Finset.mem_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @Finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_mk Finset.mem_mk
instance decidableMem [_h : DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Multiset.decidableMem _ _
#align finset.decidable_mem Finset.decidableMem
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ a = b) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ b = a) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
/-! ### set coercion -/
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
@[coe] def toSet (s : Finset α) : Set α :=
{ a | a ∈ s }
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : CoeTC (Finset α) (Set α) :=
⟨toSet⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ (s : Set α) ↔ a ∈ (s : Finset α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_coe Finset.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem {α} {s : Finset α} : { a | a ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align finset.set_of_mem Finset.setOf_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_mem {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) : ↑x ∈ s :=
x.2
#align finset.coe_mem Finset.coe_mem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mk_coe {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) {h} : (⟨x, h⟩ : (s : Set α)) = x :=
Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align finset.mk_coe Finset.mk_coe
instance decidableMem' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ (s : Set α)) :=
s.decidableMem _
#align finset.decidable_mem' Finset.decidableMem'
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans <| s₁.nodup.ext s₂.nodup
#align finset.ext_iff Finset.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
#align finset.ext Finset.ext
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
Set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
#align finset.coe_inj Finset.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective {α} : Injective ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) := fun _s _t => coe_inj.1
#align finset.coe_injective Finset.coe_injective
/-! ### type coercion -/
/-- Coercion from a finset to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type u} : CoeSort (Finset α) (Type u) :=
⟨fun s => { x // x ∈ s }⟩
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem forall_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align finset.forall_coe Finset.forall_coe
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem exists_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align finset.exists_coe Finset.exists_coe
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift (ι : Type*) (α : ι → Type*) [_ne : ∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
(s : Finset ι) : CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α (· ∈ s)
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift' (ι α : Type*) [_ne : Nonempty α] (s : Finset ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiFinsetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift' Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift'
instance FinsetCoe.canLift (s : Finset α) : CanLift α s (↑) fun a => a ∈ s where
prf a ha := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align finset.finset_coe.can_lift Finset.FinsetCoe.canLift
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sort_coe (s : Finset α) : ((s : Set α) : Sort _) = s :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_sort_coe Finset.coe_sort_coe
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
section Subset
variable {s t : Finset α}
instance : HasSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Finset α) where
le := (· ⊆ ·)
lt := (· ⊂ ·)
le_refl s a := id
le_trans s t u hst htu a ha := htu <| hst ha
le_antisymm s t hst hts := ext fun a => ⟨@hst _, @hts _⟩
instance : IsRefl (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
theorem subset_def : s ⊆ t ↔ s.1 ⊆ t.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_def Finset.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.ssubset_def Finset.ssubset_def
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ s :=
Multiset.Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.refl Finset.Subset.refl
protected theorem Subset.rfl {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.rfl Finset.Subset.rfl
protected theorem subset_of_eq {s t : Finset α} (h : s = t) : s ⊆ t :=
h ▸ Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset_of_eq Finset.subset_of_eq
theorem Subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ :=
Multiset.Subset.trans
#align finset.subset.trans Finset.Subset.trans
theorem Superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ := fun h' h =>
Subset.trans h h'
#align finset.superset.trans Finset.Superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
Multiset.mem_of_subset
#align finset.mem_of_subset Finset.mem_of_subset
theorem not_mem_mono {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) {a : α} : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align finset.not_mem_mono Finset.not_mem_mono
theorem Subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext fun a => ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
#align finset.subset.antisymm Finset.Subset.antisymm
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_iff Finset.subset_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_subset Finset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
le_iff_subset s₁.2
#align finset.val_le_iff Finset.val_le_iff
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
#align finset.subset.antisymm_iff Finset.Subset.antisymm_iff
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∉ t := by simp only [← coe_subset, Set.not_subset, mem_coe]
#align finset.not_subset Finset.not_subset
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.le_eq_subset Finset.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_subset : ((· < ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.lt_eq_subset Finset.lt_eq_subset
theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.le_iff_subset Finset.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.lt_iff_ssubset Finset.lt_iff_ssubset
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁ by simp only [Set.ssubset_def, Finset.coe_subset]
#align finset.coe_ssubset Finset.coe_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff <| not_congr val_le_iff
#align finset.val_lt_iff Finset.val_lt_iff
lemma val_strictMono : StrictMono (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ ↦ val_lt_iff.2
theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne _ _ s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
#align finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊂ s₂) : ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align finset.exists_of_ssubset Finset.exists_of_ssubset
instance isWellFounded_ssubset : IsWellFounded (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
Subrelation.isWellFounded (InvImage _ _) val_lt_iff.2
#align finset.is_well_founded_ssubset Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Finset α) :=
Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
#align finset.is_well_founded_lt Finset.wellFoundedLT
end Subset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
/-! ### Order embedding from `Finset α` to `Set α` -/
/-- Coercion to `Set α` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α :=
⟨⟨(↑), coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
#align finset.coe_emb Finset.coeEmb
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeEmb : ⇑(coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α) = ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_coe_emb Finset.coe_coeEmb
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.Nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def Nonempty (s : Finset α) : Prop := ∃ x : α, x ∈ s
#align finset.nonempty Finset.Nonempty
-- Porting note: Much longer than in Lean3
instance decidableNonempty {s : Finset α} : Decidable s.Nonempty :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (motive := fun s : Multiset α => Decidable (∃ a, a ∈ s)) s.1
(fun l : List α =>
match l with
| [] => isFalse <| by simp
| a::l => isTrue ⟨a, by simp⟩)
#align finset.decidable_nonempty Finset.decidableNonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonempty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_nonempty Finset.coe_nonempty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : Nonempty (s : Type _) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align finset.nonempty_coe_sort Finset.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.to_set⟩ := coe_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.to_set Finset.Nonempty.to_set
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align finset.nonempty.coe_sort Finset.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem Nonempty.exists_mem {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x : α, x ∈ s :=
h
#align finset.nonempty.bex Finset.Nonempty.exists_mem
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias Nonempty.bex := Nonempty.exists_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono {s t : Finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
Set.Nonempty.mono hst hs
#align finset.nonempty.mono Finset.Nonempty.mono
theorem Nonempty.forall_const {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) {p : Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s, p) ↔ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
⟨fun h => h x hx, fun h _ _ => h⟩
#align finset.nonempty.forall_const Finset.Nonempty.forall_const
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty s :=
nonempty_coe_sort.2
#align finset.nonempty.to_subtype Finset.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _hx⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align finset.nonempty.to_type Finset.Nonempty.to_type
/-! ### empty -/
section Empty
variable {s : Finset α}
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : Finset α :=
⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
#align finset.empty Finset.empty
instance : EmptyCollection (Finset α) :=
⟨Finset.empty⟩
instance inhabitedFinset : Inhabited (Finset α) :=
⟨∅⟩
#align finset.inhabited_finset Finset.inhabitedFinset
@[simp]
theorem empty_val : (∅ : Finset α).1 = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.empty_val Finset.empty_val
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : Finset α) := by
-- Porting note: was `id`. `a ∈ List.nil` is no longer definitionally equal to `False`
simp only [mem_def, empty_val, not_mem_zero, not_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_empty Finset.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Finset α).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => not_mem_empty x hx
#align finset.not_nonempty_empty Finset.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, nodup_zero⟩ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_zero Finset.mk_zero
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ := fun e =>
not_mem_empty a <| e ▸ h
#align finset.ne_empty_of_mem Finset.ne_empty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
(Exists.elim h) fun _a => ne_empty_of_mem
#align finset.nonempty.ne_empty Finset.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
zero_subset _
#align finset.empty_subset Finset.empty_subset
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
#align finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
-- Porting note: used `id`
⟨by rintro rfl x; apply not_mem_empty, fun h => eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
#align finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero {s : Finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
@val_inj _ s ∅
#align finset.val_eq_zero Finset.val_eq_zero
theorem subset_empty {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
#align finset.subset_empty Finset.subset_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_ssubset_empty (s : Finset α) : ¬s ⊂ ∅ := fun h =>
let ⟨_, he, _⟩ := exists_of_ssubset h
-- Porting note: was `he`
not_mem_empty _ he
#align finset.not_ssubset_empty Finset.not_ssubset_empty
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.Nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
#align finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
#align finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.not.trans not_not
#align finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
by_cases Or.inl fun h => Or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h)
#align finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_empty : ((∅ : Finset α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align finset.coe_empty Finset.coe_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by rw [← coe_empty, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_empty Finset.coe_eq_empty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : IsEmpty (s : Type _) ↔ s = ∅ := by
simpa using @Set.isEmpty_coe_sort α s
#align finset.is_empty_coe_sort Finset.isEmpty_coe_sort
instance instIsEmpty : IsEmpty (∅ : Finset α) :=
isEmpty_coe_sort.2 rfl
/-- A `Finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ :=
Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
#align finset.eq_empty_of_is_empty Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance : OrderBot (Finset α) where
bot := ∅
bot_le := empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.bot_eq_empty Finset.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Finset α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align finset.empty_ssubset Finset.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align finset.nonempty.empty_ssubset Finset.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
end Empty
/-! ### singleton -/
section Singleton
variable {s : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `{a} : Finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `DecidableEq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : Singleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).1 = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_val Finset.singleton_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Finset α) ↔ b = a :=
Multiset.mem_singleton
#align finset.mem_singleton Finset.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Finset α)) : x = y :=
mem_singleton.1 h
#align finset.eq_of_mem_singleton Finset.eq_of_mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : Finset α) ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr mem_singleton
#align finset.not_mem_singleton Finset.not_mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Finset α) :=
-- Porting note: was `Or.inl rfl`
mem_singleton.mpr rfl
#align finset.mem_singleton_self Finset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Finset α} : s.val = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← val_inj]
rfl
#align finset.val_eq_singleton_iff Finset.val_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Finset α) := fun _a _b h =>
mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _)
#align finset.singleton_injective Finset.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj : ({a} : Finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.singleton_inj Finset.singleton_inj
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
#align finset.singleton_nonempty Finset.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
#align finset.singleton_ne_empty Finset.singleton_ne_empty
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Finset α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align finset.empty_ssubset_singleton Finset.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : (({a} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_singleton Finset.coe_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (s : Set α) = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_singleton Finset.coe_eq_singleton
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_subset_singleton : (s : Set α) ⊆ {a} ↔ s ⊆ {a} := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
@[norm_cast]
lemma singleton_subset_coe : {a} ⊆ (s : Set α) ↔ {a} ⊆ s := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor <;> intro t
· rw [t]
exact ⟨Finset.mem_singleton_self _, fun _ => Finset.mem_singleton.1⟩
· ext
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨t.right _, fun r => r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· rintro ⟨hne, h_uniq⟩
rw [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem]
refine ⟨?_, h_uniq⟩
rw [← h_uniq hne.choose hne.choose_spec]
exact hne.choose_spec
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
theorem nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default [Unique α] {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty ↔ s = {default} := by
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default Finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
alias ⟨Nonempty.eq_singleton_default, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
#align finset.nonempty.eq_singleton_default Finset.Nonempty.eq_singleton_default
theorem singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : Finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s := by
simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, ExistsUnique]
#align finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem singleton_subset_set_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : ↑({a} : Finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [coe_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
#align finset.singleton_subset_set_iff Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
#align finset.singleton_subset_iff Finset.singleton_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton, Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq, coe_eq_empty, coe_eq_singleton]
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff Finset.subset_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Finset α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align finset.singleton_subset_singleton Finset.singleton_subset_singleton
protected theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align finset.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => mem_singleton
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff' Finset.subset_singleton_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_singleton, Set.ssubset_singleton_iff, coe_eq_empty]
#align finset.ssubset_singleton_iff Finset.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
/-- A finset is nontrivial if it has at least two elements. -/
protected abbrev Nontrivial (s : Finset α) : Prop := (s : Set α).Nontrivial
#align finset.nontrivial Finset.Nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_empty : ¬ (∅ : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_empty Finset.not_nontrivial_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_singleton : ¬ ({a} : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_singleton Finset.not_nontrivial_singleton
theorem Nontrivial.ne_singleton (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ {a} := by
rintro rfl; exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs
#align finset.nontrivial.ne_singleton Finset.Nontrivial.ne_singleton
nonrec lemma Nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.Nontrivial) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := hs.exists_ne _
theorem eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton]; exact Set.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha
#align finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨Nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
#align finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton Finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton
theorem Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.Nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.Nontrivial :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left <| Exists.intro a
#align finset.nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
instance instNontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Finset α) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨⟨{a}, ∅, singleton_ne_empty _⟩⟩
#align finset.nontrivial' Finset.instNontrivial
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Finset α) where
default := ∅
uniq _ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
instance (i : α) : Unique ({i} : Finset α) where
default := ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩
uniq j := Subtype.ext <| mem_singleton.mp j.2
@[simp]
lemma default_singleton (i : α) : ((default : ({i} : Finset α)) : α) = i := rfl
end Singleton
/-! ### cons -/
section Cons
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `DecidableEq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : Finset α :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
#align finset.cons Finset.cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {h} : b ∈ s.cons a h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons
#align finset.mem_cons Finset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Finset α} {hb : b ∉ s} (ha : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s hb :=
Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem ha
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) {h} : a ∈ cons a s h :=
Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _
#align finset.mem_cons_self Finset.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.cons_val Finset.cons_val
theorem forall_mem_cons (h : a ∉ s) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.forall_mem_cons Finset.forall_mem_cons
/-- Useful in proofs by induction. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_cons {p : α → Prop} {h : a ∉ s} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) (x)
(h : x ∈ s) : p x :=
H _ <| mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.forall_of_forall_cons Finset.forall_of_forall_cons
@[simp]
theorem mk_cons {s : Multiset α} (h : (a ::ₘ s).Nodup) :
(⟨a ::ₘ s, h⟩ : Finset α) = cons a ⟨s, (nodup_cons.1 h).2⟩ (nodup_cons.1 h).1 :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_cons Finset.mk_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_empty (a : α) : cons a ∅ (not_mem_empty _) = {a} := rfl
#align finset.cons_empty Finset.cons_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_cons.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩
#align finset.nonempty_cons Finset.nonempty_cons
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk {m : Multiset α} {hm} : (⟨m, hm⟩ : Finset α).Nonempty ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
induction m using Multiset.induction_on <;> simp
#align finset.nonempty_mk Finset.nonempty_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_cons {a s h} : (@cons α a s h : Set α) = insert a (s : Set α) := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_cons Finset.coe_cons
theorem subset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.subset_cons _ _
#align finset.subset_cons Finset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.ssubset_cons h
#align finset.ssubset_cons Finset.ssubset_cons
theorem cons_subset {h : a ∉ s} : s.cons a h ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
Multiset.cons_subset
#align finset.cons_subset Finset.cons_subset
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset_cons {hs ht} : s.cons a hs ⊆ t.cons a ht ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rwa [← coe_subset, coe_cons, coe_cons, Set.insert_subset_insert_iff, coe_subset]
#align finset.cons_subset_cons Finset.cons_subset_cons
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∉ s), s.cons a h ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset (ssubset_cons _) h⟩
obtain ⟨a, hs, ht⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, cons_subset.2 ⟨hs, h.subset⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset
end Cons
/-! ### disjoint -/
section Disjoint
variable {f : α → β} {s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
⟨fun h a hs ht => not_mem_empty a <|
singleton_subset_iff.mp (h (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hs) (singleton_subset_iff.mpr ht)),
fun h _ hs ht _ ha => (h (hs ha) (ht ha)).elim⟩
#align finset.disjoint_left Finset.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by
rw [_root_.disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align finset.disjoint_right Finset.disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b := by
simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
#align finset.disjoint_iff_ne Finset.disjoint_iff_ne
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_val : s.1.Disjoint t.1 ↔ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.disjoint_val Finset.disjoint_val
theorem _root_.Disjoint.forall_ne_finset (h : Disjoint s t) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : a ≠ b :=
disjoint_iff_ne.1 h _ ha _ hb
#align disjoint.forall_ne_finset Disjoint.forall_ne_finset
theorem not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
disjoint_left.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => by
rw [Classical.not_imp, not_not]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff Finset.not_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_left.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_left Finset.disjoint_of_subset_left
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_right.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_right.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_right Finset.disjoint_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_left (s : Finset α) : Disjoint ∅ s :=
disjoint_bot_left
#align finset.disjoint_empty_left Finset.disjoint_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_right (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s ∅ :=
disjoint_bot_right
#align finset.disjoint_empty_right Finset.disjoint_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint (singleton a) s ↔ a ∉ s := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_left Finset.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s (singleton a) ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_right Finset.disjoint_singleton_right
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 1,016 | 1,017 | theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Finset α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by |
rw [disjoint_singleton_left, mem_singleton]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Units
#align_import algebra.associated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
/-!
# Associated, prime, and irreducible elements.
In this file we define the predicate `Prime p`
saying that an element of a commutative monoid with zero is prime.
Namely, `Prime p` means that `p` isn't zero, it isn't a unit,
and `p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b` for all `a`, `b`;
In decomposition monoids (e.g., `ℕ`, `ℤ`), this predicate is equivalent to `Irreducible`,
however this is not true in general.
We also define an equivalence relation `Associated`
saying that two elements of a monoid differ by a multiplication by a unit.
Then we show that the quotient type `Associates` is a monoid
and prove basic properties of this quotient.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
section Prime
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
/-- An element `p` of a commutative monoid with zero (e.g., a ring) is called *prime*,
if it's not zero, not a unit, and `p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b` for all `a`, `b`. -/
def Prime (p : α) : Prop :=
p ≠ 0 ∧ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p ∣ a * b → p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b
#align prime Prime
namespace Prime
variable {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
theorem ne_zero : p ≠ 0 :=
hp.1
#align prime.ne_zero Prime.ne_zero
theorem not_unit : ¬IsUnit p :=
hp.2.1
#align prime.not_unit Prime.not_unit
theorem not_dvd_one : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_one ·) hp.not_unit
#align prime.not_dvd_one Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem ne_one : p ≠ 1 := fun h => hp.2.1 (h.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
#align prime.ne_one Prime.ne_one
theorem dvd_or_dvd (hp : Prime p) {a b : α} (h : p ∣ a * b) : p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b :=
hp.2.2 a b h
#align prime.dvd_or_dvd Prime.dvd_or_dvd
theorem dvd_mul {a b : α} : p ∣ a * b ↔ p ∣ a ∨ p ∣ b :=
⟨hp.dvd_or_dvd, (Or.elim · (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left · _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right · _))⟩
theorem isPrimal (hp : Prime p) : IsPrimal p := fun _a _b dvd ↦ (hp.dvd_or_dvd dvd).elim
(fun h ↦ ⟨p, 1, h, one_dvd _, (mul_one p).symm⟩) fun h ↦ ⟨1, p, one_dvd _, h, (one_mul p).symm⟩
theorem not_dvd_mul {a b : α} (ha : ¬ p ∣ a) (hb : ¬ p ∣ b) : ¬ p ∣ a * b :=
hp.dvd_mul.not.mpr <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem dvd_of_dvd_pow (hp : Prime p) {a : α} {n : ℕ} (h : p ∣ a ^ n) : p ∣ a := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero] at h
have := isUnit_of_dvd_one h
have := not_unit hp
contradiction
rw [pow_succ'] at h
cases' dvd_or_dvd hp h with dvd_a dvd_pow
· assumption
exact ih dvd_pow
#align prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow
theorem dvd_pow_iff_dvd {a : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∣ a ^ n ↔ p ∣ a :=
⟨hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow, (dvd_pow · hn)⟩
end Prime
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime (0 : α) := fun h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align not_prime_zero not_prime_zero
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime (1 : α) := fun h => h.not_unit isUnit_one
#align not_prime_one not_prime_one
section Map
variable [CommMonoidWithZero β] {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [FunLike F α β]
variable [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β] [FunLike G β α] [MulHomClass G β α]
variable (f : F) (g : G) {p : α}
theorem comap_prime (hinv : ∀ a, g (f a : β) = a) (hp : Prime (f p)) : Prime p :=
⟨fun h => hp.1 <| by simp [h], fun h => hp.2.1 <| h.map f, fun a b h => by
refine
(hp.2.2 (f a) (f b) <| by
convert map_dvd f h
simp).imp
?_ ?_ <;>
· intro h
convert ← map_dvd g h <;> apply hinv⟩
#align comap_prime comap_prime
theorem MulEquiv.prime_iff (e : α ≃* β) : Prime p ↔ Prime (e p) :=
⟨fun h => (comap_prime e.symm e fun a => by simp) <| (e.symm_apply_apply p).substr h,
comap_prime e e.symm fun a => by simp⟩
#align mul_equiv.prime_iff MulEquiv.prime_iff
end Map
end Prime
theorem Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
{a b : α} : a ∣ p * b → p ∣ a ∨ a ∣ b := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
rcases hp.2.2 a c (hc ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _) with (h | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' hp.ne_zero] at hc
exact Or.inr (hc.symm ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ a) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ b := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero]
exact one_dvd b
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := ih (dvd_trans (pow_dvd_pow p n.le_succ) h')
rw [pow_succ]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left _ ((hp.dvd_or_dvd _).resolve_left h)
rwa [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero), ← pow_succ, mul_left_comm]
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ b) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ a := by
rw [mul_comm] at h'
exact hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left n h h'
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
theorem Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α}
{n : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hpow : p ^ n.succ ∣ a ^ n.succ * b ^ n) (hb : ¬p ^ 2 ∣ b) : p ∣ a := by
-- Suppose `p ∣ b`, write `b = p * x` and `hy : a ^ n.succ * b ^ n = p ^ n.succ * y`.
cases' hp.dvd_or_dvd ((dvd_pow_self p (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).trans hpow) with H hbdiv
· exact hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow H
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hbdiv
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hpow
-- Then we can divide out a common factor of `p ^ n` from the equation `hy`.
have : a ^ n.succ * x ^ n = p * y := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero) ?_
rw [← mul_assoc _ p, ← pow_succ, ← hy, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc (a ^ n.succ), mul_comm _ (p ^ n),
mul_assoc]
-- So `p ∣ a` (and we're done) or `p ∣ x`, which can't be the case since it implies `p^2 ∣ b`.
refine hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow ((hp.dvd_or_dvd ⟨_, this⟩).resolve_right fun hdvdx => hb ?_)
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hdvdx
rw [pow_two, ← mul_assoc]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd
theorem prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p x y : α} (h : Prime p)
{i : ℕ} (hxy : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x * y) : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x ∨ p ∣ y := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro hy
induction' i with i ih generalizing x
· rw [pow_one] at hxy ⊢
exact (h.dvd_or_dvd hxy).resolve_right hy
rw [pow_succ'] at hxy ⊢
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := (h.dvd_or_dvd (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd hxy)).resolve_right hy
rw [mul_assoc] at hxy
exact mul_dvd_mul_left p (ih ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h.ne_zero).mp hxy))
#align prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul
/-- `Irreducible p` states that `p` is non-unit and only factors into units.
We explicitly avoid stating that `p` is non-zero, this would require a semiring. Assuming only a
monoid allows us to reuse irreducible for associated elements.
-/
structure Irreducible [Monoid α] (p : α) : Prop where
/-- `p` is not a unit -/
not_unit : ¬IsUnit p
/-- if `p` factors then one factor is a unit -/
isUnit_or_isUnit' : ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b
#align irreducible Irreducible
namespace Irreducible
theorem not_dvd_one [CommMonoid α] {p : α} (hp : Irreducible p) : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_one ·) hp.not_unit
#align irreducible.not_dvd_one Irreducible.not_dvd_one
theorem isUnit_or_isUnit [Monoid α] {p : α} (hp : Irreducible p) {a b : α} (h : p = a * b) :
IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
hp.isUnit_or_isUnit' a b h
#align irreducible.is_unit_or_is_unit Irreducible.isUnit_or_isUnit
end Irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p : α} :
Irreducible p ↔ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
#align irreducible_iff irreducible_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_one [Monoid α] : ¬Irreducible (1 : α) := by simp [irreducible_iff]
#align not_irreducible_one not_irreducible_one
theorem Irreducible.ne_one [Monoid α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 1
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_one hp
#align irreducible.ne_one Irreducible.ne_one
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ¬Irreducible (0 : α)
| ⟨hn0, h⟩ =>
have : IsUnit (0 : α) ∨ IsUnit (0 : α) := h 0 0 (mul_zero 0).symm
this.elim hn0 hn0
#align not_irreducible_zero not_irreducible_zero
theorem Irreducible.ne_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 0
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_zero hp
#align irreducible.ne_zero Irreducible.ne_zero
theorem of_irreducible_mul {α} [Monoid α] {x y : α} : Irreducible (x * y) → IsUnit x ∨ IsUnit y
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h _ _ rfl
#align of_irreducible_mul of_irreducible_mul
theorem not_irreducible_pow {α} [Monoid α] {x : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) :
¬ Irreducible (x ^ n) := by
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
have := h₂ _ _ (pow_succ _ _)
rw [isUnit_pow_iff (Nat.succ_ne_succ.mp hn), or_self] at this
exact h₁ (this.pow _)
#noalign of_irreducible_pow
theorem irreducible_or_factor {α} [Monoid α] (x : α) (h : ¬IsUnit x) :
Irreducible x ∨ ∃ a b, ¬IsUnit a ∧ ¬IsUnit b ∧ a * b = x := by
haveI := Classical.dec
refine or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun H => ?_
simp? [h, irreducible_iff] at H ⊢ says
simp only [exists_and_left, not_exists, not_and, irreducible_iff, h, not_false_eq_true,
true_and] at H ⊢
refine fun a b h => by_contradiction fun o => ?_
simp? [not_or] at o says simp only [not_or] at o
exact H _ o.1 _ o.2 h.symm
#align irreducible_or_factor irreducible_or_factor
/-- If `p` and `q` are irreducible, then `p ∣ q` implies `q ∣ p`. -/
theorem Irreducible.dvd_symm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q → q ∣ p := by
rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
rw [IsUnit.mul_right_dvd (Or.resolve_left (of_irreducible_mul hq) hp.not_unit)]
#align irreducible.dvd_symm Irreducible.dvd_symm
theorem Irreducible.dvd_comm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q ↔ q ∣ p :=
⟨hp.dvd_symm hq, hq.dvd_symm hp⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_comm Irreducible.dvd_comm
section
variable [Monoid α]
theorem irreducible_units_mul (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (↑a * b) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_units_mul, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← a.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← a⁻¹.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align irreducible_units_mul irreducible_units_mul
theorem irreducible_isUnit_mul {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_units_mul a b
#align irreducible_is_unit_mul irreducible_isUnit_mul
theorem irreducible_mul_units (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (b * ↑a) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_mul_units, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a⁻¹]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]
#align irreducible_mul_units irreducible_mul_units
theorem irreducible_mul_isUnit {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (b * a) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_mul_units a b
#align irreducible_mul_is_unit irreducible_mul_isUnit
theorem irreducible_mul_iff {a b : α} :
Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible a ∧ IsUnit b ∨ Irreducible b ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· refine fun h => Or.imp (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (h.isUnit_or_isUnit rfl).symm
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit h'] at h
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul h'] at h
· rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩ | ⟨hb, ha⟩)
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit hb]
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul ha]
#align irreducible_mul_iff irreducible_mul_iff
end
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a : α}
theorem Irreducible.not_square (ha : Irreducible a) : ¬IsSquare a := by
rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq]
rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact not_irreducible_pow (by decide) ha
#align irreducible.not_square Irreducible.not_square
theorem IsSquare.not_irreducible (ha : IsSquare a) : ¬Irreducible a := fun h => h.not_square ha
#align is_square.not_irreducible IsSquare.not_irreducible
end CommMonoid
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
theorem Irreducible.prime_of_isPrimal {a : α}
(irr : Irreducible a) (primal : IsPrimal a) : Prime a :=
⟨irr.ne_zero, irr.not_unit, fun a b dvd ↦ by
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ := primal dvd
exact (of_irreducible_mul irr).symm.imp (·.mul_right_dvd.mpr h₁) (·.mul_left_dvd.mpr h₂)⟩
theorem Irreducible.prime [DecompositionMonoid α] {a : α} (irr : Irreducible a) : Prime a :=
irr.prime_of_isPrimal (DecompositionMonoid.primal a)
end CommMonoidWithZero
section CancelCommMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a p : α}
protected theorem Prime.irreducible (hp : Prime p) : Irreducible p :=
⟨hp.not_unit, fun a b ↦ by
rintro rfl
exact (hp.dvd_or_dvd dvd_rfl).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_dvd_one <| (mul_dvd_mul_iff_right <| right_ne_zero_of_mul hp.ne_zero).mp <|
dvd_mul_of_dvd_right · _)
(isUnit_of_dvd_one <| (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left <| left_ne_zero_of_mul hp.ne_zero).mp <|
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left · _)⟩
#align prime.irreducible Prime.irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff_prime [DecompositionMonoid α] {a : α} : Irreducible a ↔ Prime a :=
⟨Irreducible.prime, Prime.irreducible⟩
theorem succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul (hp : Prime p) {a b : α} {k l : ℕ} :
p ^ k ∣ a → p ^ l ∣ b → p ^ (k + l + 1) ∣ a * b → p ^ (k + 1) ∣ a ∨ p ^ (l + 1) ∣ b :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ⟨z, hz⟩ =>
have h : p ^ (k + l) * (x * y) = p ^ (k + l) * (p * z) := by
simpa [mul_comm, pow_add, hx, hy, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm] using hz
have hp0 : p ^ (k + l) ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero
have hpd : p ∣ x * y := ⟨z, by rwa [mul_right_inj' hp0] at h⟩
(hp.dvd_or_dvd hpd).elim
(fun ⟨d, hd⟩ => Or.inl ⟨d, by simp [*, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]⟩)
fun ⟨d, hd⟩ => Or.inr ⟨d, by simp [*, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]⟩
#align succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul succ_dvd_or_succ_dvd_of_succ_sum_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.not_square (hp : Prime p) : ¬IsSquare p :=
hp.irreducible.not_square
#align prime.not_square Prime.not_square
theorem IsSquare.not_prime (ha : IsSquare a) : ¬Prime a := fun h => h.not_square ha
#align is_square.not_prime IsSquare.not_prime
theorem not_prime_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ¬Prime (a ^ n) := fun hp =>
not_irreducible_pow hn hp.irreducible
#align pow_not_prime not_prime_pow
end CancelCommMonoidWithZero
/-- Two elements of a `Monoid` are `Associated` if one of them is another one
multiplied by a unit on the right. -/
def Associated [Monoid α] (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ u : αˣ, x * u = y
#align associated Associated
/-- Notation for two elements of a monoid are associated, i.e.
if one of them is another one multiplied by a unit on the right. -/
local infixl:50 " ~ᵤ " => Associated
namespace Associated
@[refl]
protected theorem refl [Monoid α] (x : α) : x ~ᵤ x :=
⟨1, by simp⟩
#align associated.refl Associated.refl
protected theorem rfl [Monoid α] {x : α} : x ~ᵤ x :=
.refl x
instance [Monoid α] : IsRefl α Associated :=
⟨Associated.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm [Monoid α] : ∀ {x y : α}, x ~ᵤ y → y ~ᵤ x
| x, _, ⟨u, rfl⟩ => ⟨u⁻¹, by rw [mul_assoc, Units.mul_inv, mul_one]⟩
#align associated.symm Associated.symm
instance [Monoid α] : IsSymm α Associated :=
⟨fun _ _ => Associated.symm⟩
protected theorem comm [Monoid α] {x y : α} : x ~ᵤ y ↔ y ~ᵤ x :=
⟨Associated.symm, Associated.symm⟩
#align associated.comm Associated.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans [Monoid α] : ∀ {x y z : α}, x ~ᵤ y → y ~ᵤ z → x ~ᵤ z
| x, _, _, ⟨u, rfl⟩, ⟨v, rfl⟩ => ⟨u * v, by rw [Units.val_mul, mul_assoc]⟩
#align associated.trans Associated.trans
instance [Monoid α] : IsTrans α Associated :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => Associated.trans⟩
/-- The setoid of the relation `x ~ᵤ y` iff there is a unit `u` such that `x * u = y` -/
protected def setoid (α : Type*) [Monoid α] :
Setoid α where
r := Associated
iseqv := ⟨Associated.refl, Associated.symm, Associated.trans⟩
#align associated.setoid Associated.setoid
theorem map {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N]
(f : F) {x y : M} (ha : Associated x y) : Associated (f x) (f y) := by
obtain ⟨u, ha⟩ := ha
exact ⟨Units.map f u, by rw [← ha, map_mul, Units.coe_map, MonoidHom.coe_coe]⟩
end Associated
attribute [local instance] Associated.setoid
theorem unit_associated_one [Monoid α] {u : αˣ} : (u : α) ~ᵤ 1 :=
⟨u⁻¹, Units.mul_inv u⟩
#align unit_associated_one unit_associated_one
@[simp]
theorem associated_one_iff_isUnit [Monoid α] {a : α} : (a : α) ~ᵤ 1 ↔ IsUnit a :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨c, h⟩ := h.symm
h ▸ ⟨c, (one_mul _).symm⟩)
fun ⟨c, h⟩ => Associated.symm ⟨c, by simp [h]⟩
#align associated_one_iff_is_unit associated_one_iff_isUnit
@[simp]
theorem associated_zero_iff_eq_zero [MonoidWithZero α] (a : α) : a ~ᵤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨u, h⟩ := h.symm
simpa using h.symm)
fun h => h ▸ Associated.refl a
#align associated_zero_iff_eq_zero associated_zero_iff_eq_zero
theorem associated_one_of_mul_eq_one [CommMonoid α] {a : α} (b : α) (hab : a * b = 1) : a ~ᵤ 1 :=
show (Units.mkOfMulEqOne a b hab : α) ~ᵤ 1 from unit_associated_one
#align associated_one_of_mul_eq_one associated_one_of_mul_eq_one
theorem associated_one_of_associated_mul_one [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} : a * b ~ᵤ 1 → a ~ᵤ 1
| ⟨u, h⟩ => associated_one_of_mul_eq_one (b * u) <| by simpa [mul_assoc] using h
#align associated_one_of_associated_mul_one associated_one_of_associated_mul_one
theorem associated_mul_unit_left {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) a :=
let ⟨u', hu⟩ := hu
⟨u'⁻¹, hu ▸ Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _⟩
#align associated_mul_unit_left associated_mul_unit_left
theorem associated_unit_mul_left {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) a := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu
#align associated_unit_mul_left associated_unit_mul_left
theorem associated_mul_unit_right {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (a * u) :=
(associated_mul_unit_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_mul_unit_right associated_mul_unit_right
theorem associated_unit_mul_right {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * a) :=
(associated_unit_mul_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_unit_mul_right associated_unit_mul_right
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
⟨(associated_mul_unit_right _ _ hu).trans, (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu).trans⟩
#align associated_mul_is_unit_left_iff associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {u a b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) b ↔ Associated a b := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu
#align associated_is_unit_mul_left_iff associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b u : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_mul_is_unit_right_iff associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_is_unit_mul_right_iff associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_left_iff associated_mul_unit_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (↑u * a) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_left_iff associated_unit_mul_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_right_iff associated_mul_unit_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (↑u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_right_iff associated_unit_mul_right_iff
theorem Associated.mul_left [Monoid α] (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a * b ~ᵤ a * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_left Associated.mul_left
theorem Associated.mul_right [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) (c : α) : a * c ~ᵤ b * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_right_comm _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_right Associated.mul_right
theorem Associated.mul_mul [CommMonoid α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
(h₁ : a₁ ~ᵤ b₁) (h₂ : a₂ ~ᵤ b₂) : a₁ * a₂ ~ᵤ b₁ * b₂ := (h₁.mul_right _).trans (h₂.mul_left _)
#align associated.mul_mul Associated.mul_mul
theorem Associated.pow_pow [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ^ n ~ᵤ b ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp [Associated.refl]
convert h.mul_mul ih <;> rw [pow_succ']
#align associated.pow_pow Associated.pow_pow
protected theorem Associated.dvd [Monoid α] {a b : α} : a ~ᵤ b → a ∣ b := fun ⟨u, hu⟩ =>
⟨u, hu.symm⟩
#align associated.dvd Associated.dvd
protected theorem Associated.dvd' [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : b ∣ a :=
h.symm.dvd
protected theorem Associated.dvd_dvd [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ∣ b ∧ b ∣ a :=
⟨h.dvd, h.symm.dvd⟩
#align associated.dvd_dvd Associated.dvd_dvd
theorem associated_of_dvd_dvd [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
a ~ᵤ b := by
rcases hab with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases hba with ⟨d, a_eq⟩
by_cases ha0 : a = 0
· simp_all
have hac0 : a * c ≠ 0 := by
intro con
rw [con, zero_mul] at a_eq
apply ha0 a_eq
have : a * (c * d) = a * 1 := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← a_eq, mul_one]
have hcd : c * d = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ ha0 this
have : a * c * (d * c) = a * c * 1 := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← a_eq, mul_one]
have hdc : d * c = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hac0 this
exact ⟨⟨c, d, hcd, hdc⟩, rfl⟩
#align associated_of_dvd_dvd associated_of_dvd_dvd
theorem dvd_dvd_iff_associated [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} : a ∣ b ∧ b ∣ a ↔ a ~ᵤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => associated_of_dvd_dvd h1 h2, Associated.dvd_dvd⟩
#align dvd_dvd_iff_associated dvd_dvd_iff_associated
instance [CancelMonoidWithZero α] [DecidableRel ((· ∣ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
DecidableRel ((· ~ᵤ ·) : α → α → Prop) := fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff _ dvd_dvd_iff_associated
theorem Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left [Monoid α] {a b c : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ∣ c ↔ b ∣ c :=
let ⟨_, hu⟩ := h
hu ▸ Units.mul_right_dvd.symm
#align associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left
theorem Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right [Monoid α] {a b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ c :=
let ⟨_, hu⟩ := h
hu ▸ Units.dvd_mul_right.symm
#align associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right
theorem Associated.eq_zero_iff [MonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [← Units.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq, zero_mul]
#align associated.eq_zero_iff Associated.eq_zero_iff
theorem Associated.ne_zero_iff [MonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ≠ 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 :=
not_congr h.eq_zero_iff
#align associated.ne_zero_iff Associated.ne_zero_iff
theorem Associated.neg_left [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated (-a) b :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h; ⟨-u, by simp [hu]⟩
theorem Associated.neg_right [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated a (-b) :=
h.symm.neg_left.symm
theorem Associated.neg_neg [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated (-a) (-b) :=
h.neg_left.neg_right
protected theorem Associated.prime [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) (hp : Prime p) :
Prime q :=
⟨h.ne_zero_iff.1 hp.ne_zero,
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
⟨fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => hp.not_unit ⟨v * u⁻¹, by simp [hv, hu.symm]⟩,
hu ▸ by
simp only [IsUnit.mul_iff, Units.isUnit, and_true, IsUnit.mul_right_dvd]
intro a b
exact hp.dvd_or_dvd⟩⟩
#align associated.prime Associated.prime
theorem prime_mul_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {x y : α} :
Prime (x * y) ↔ (Prime x ∧ IsUnit y) ∨ (IsUnit x ∧ Prime y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases of_irreducible_mul h.irreducible with hx | hy
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, (associated_unit_mul_left y x hx).prime h⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨(associated_mul_unit_left x y hy).prime h, hy⟩
· rintro (⟨hx, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, hy⟩)
· exact (associated_mul_unit_left x y hy).symm.prime hx
· exact (associated_unit_mul_right y x hx).prime hy
@[simp]
lemma prime_pow_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} {n : ℕ} :
Prime (p ^ n) ↔ Prime p ∧ n = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, fun ⟨hp, hn⟩ ↦ by simpa [hn]⟩
suffices n = 1 by aesop
cases' n with n
· simp at hp
· rw [Nat.succ.injEq]
rw [pow_succ', prime_mul_iff] at hp
rcases hp with ⟨hp, hpn⟩ | ⟨hp, hpn⟩
· by_contra contra
rw [isUnit_pow_iff contra] at hpn
exact hp.not_unit hpn
· exfalso
exact hpn.not_unit (hp.pow n)
theorem Irreducible.dvd_iff [Monoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
y ∣ x ↔ IsUnit y ∨ Associated x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
obtain (h|h) := hx.isUnit_or_isUnit hz
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [hz]
exact Or.inr (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ h)
· rintro (hy|h)
· exact hy.dvd
· exact h.symm.dvd
theorem Irreducible.associated_of_dvd [Monoid α] {p q : α} (p_irr : Irreducible p)
(q_irr : Irreducible q) (dvd : p ∣ q) : Associated p q :=
((q_irr.dvd_iff.mp dvd).resolve_left p_irr.not_unit).symm
#align irreducible.associated_of_dvd Irreducible.associated_of_dvdₓ
theorem Irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated [Monoid α] {p q : α}
(pp : Irreducible p) (qp : Irreducible q) : p ∣ q ↔ Associated p q :=
⟨Irreducible.associated_of_dvd pp qp, Associated.dvd⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated Irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated
theorem Prime.associated_of_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (p_prime : Prime p)
(q_prime : Prime q) (dvd : p ∣ q) : Associated p q :=
p_prime.irreducible.associated_of_dvd q_prime.irreducible dvd
#align prime.associated_of_dvd Prime.associated_of_dvd
theorem Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (pp : Prime p)
(qp : Prime q) : p ∣ q ↔ Associated p q :=
pp.irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated qp.irreducible
#align prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated
theorem Associated.prime_iff [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) : Prime p ↔ Prime q :=
⟨h.prime, h.symm.prime⟩
#align associated.prime_iff Associated.prime_iff
protected theorem Associated.isUnit [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : IsUnit a → IsUnit b :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => ⟨v * u, by simp [hv, hu.symm]⟩
#align associated.is_unit Associated.isUnit
theorem Associated.isUnit_iff [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : IsUnit a ↔ IsUnit b :=
⟨h.isUnit, h.symm.isUnit⟩
#align associated.is_unit_iff Associated.isUnit_iff
theorem Irreducible.isUnit_iff_not_associated_of_dvd [Monoid α]
{x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) (hy : y ∣ x) : IsUnit y ↔ ¬ Associated x y :=
⟨fun hy hxy => hx.1 (hxy.symm.isUnit hy), (hx.dvd_iff.mp hy).resolve_right⟩
protected theorem Associated.irreducible [Monoid α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) (hp : Irreducible p) :
Irreducible q :=
⟨mt h.symm.isUnit hp.1,
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
fun a b hab =>
have hpab : p = a * (b * (u⁻¹ : αˣ)) :=
calc
p = p * u * (u⁻¹ : αˣ) := by simp
_ = _ := by rw [hu]; simp [hab, mul_assoc]
(hp.isUnit_or_isUnit hpab).elim Or.inl fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => Or.inr ⟨v * u, by simp [hv]⟩⟩
#align associated.irreducible Associated.irreducible
protected theorem Associated.irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) :
Irreducible p ↔ Irreducible q :=
⟨h.irreducible, h.symm.irreducible⟩
#align associated.irreducible_iff Associated.irreducible_iff
theorem Associated.of_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b ~ᵤ c * d)
(h₁ : a ~ᵤ c) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b ~ᵤ d :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := Associated.symm h₁
⟨u * (v : αˣ),
mul_left_cancel₀ ha
(by
rw [← hv, mul_assoc c (v : α) d, mul_left_comm c, ← hu]
simp [hv.symm, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm])⟩
#align associated.of_mul_left Associated.of_mul_left
theorem Associated.of_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d : α} :
a * b ~ᵤ c * d → b ~ᵤ d → b ≠ 0 → a ~ᵤ c := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm c]; exact Associated.of_mul_left
#align associated.of_mul_right Associated.of_mul_right
theorem Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p₁ p₂ : α} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
(hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₁) (h : p₁ ^ k₁ ~ᵤ p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ ~ᵤ p₂ := by
have : p₁ ∣ p₂ ^ k₂ := by
rw [← h.dvd_iff_dvd_right]
apply dvd_pow_self _ hk₁.ne'
rw [← hp₁.dvd_prime_iff_associated hp₂]
exact hp₁.dvd_of_dvd_pow this
#align associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime
theorem Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime' [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p₁ p₂ : α} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
(hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₂ : 0 < k₂) (h : p₁ ^ k₁ ~ᵤ p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ ~ᵤ p₂ :=
(h.symm.of_pow_associated_of_prime hp₂ hp₁ hk₂).symm
#align associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime' Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime'
/-- See also `Irreducible.coprime_iff_not_dvd`. -/
lemma Irreducible.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd [Monoid α] {p n : α} (hp : Irreducible p) :
IsRelPrime p n ↔ ¬ p ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h contra ↦ hp.not_unit (h dvd_rfl contra), fun hpn d hdp hdn ↦ ?_⟩
contrapose! hpn
suffices Associated p d from this.dvd.trans hdn
exact (hp.dvd_iff.mp hdp).resolve_left hpn
lemma Irreducible.dvd_or_isRelPrime [Monoid α] {p n : α} (hp : Irreducible p) :
p ∣ n ∨ IsRelPrime p n := Classical.or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr hp.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd.2
section UniqueUnits
variable [Monoid α] [Unique αˣ]
theorem associated_iff_eq {x y : α} : x ~ᵤ y ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [units_eq_one c, Units.val_one, mul_one]
· rintro rfl
rfl
#align associated_iff_eq associated_iff_eq
theorem associated_eq_eq : (Associated : α → α → Prop) = Eq := by
ext
rw [associated_iff_eq]
#align associated_eq_eq associated_eq_eq
theorem prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq {M : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero M] [Unique Mˣ] {p q : M}
(pp : Prime p) (qp : Prime q) : p ∣ q ↔ p = q := by
rw [pp.dvd_prime_iff_associated qp, ← associated_eq_eq]
#align prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq
end UniqueUnits
section UniqueUnits₀
variable {R : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] [Unique Rˣ] {p₁ p₂ : R} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
theorem eq_of_prime_pow_eq (hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₁)
(h : p₁ ^ k₁ = p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq] at h ⊢
apply h.of_pow_associated_of_prime hp₁ hp₂ hk₁
#align eq_of_prime_pow_eq eq_of_prime_pow_eq
theorem eq_of_prime_pow_eq' (hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₂)
(h : p₁ ^ k₁ = p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq] at h ⊢
apply h.of_pow_associated_of_prime' hp₁ hp₂ hk₁
#align eq_of_prime_pow_eq' eq_of_prime_pow_eq'
end UniqueUnits₀
/-- The quotient of a monoid by the `Associated` relation. Two elements `x` and `y`
are associated iff there is a unit `u` such that `x * u = y`. There is a natural
monoid structure on `Associates α`. -/
abbrev Associates (α : Type*) [Monoid α] : Type _ :=
Quotient (Associated.setoid α)
#align associates Associates
namespace Associates
open Associated
/-- The canonical quotient map from a monoid `α` into the `Associates` of `α` -/
protected abbrev mk {α : Type*} [Monoid α] (a : α) : Associates α :=
⟦a⟧
#align associates.mk Associates.mk
instance [Monoid α] : Inhabited (Associates α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff_associated [Monoid α] {a b : α} : Associates.mk a = Associates.mk b ↔ a ~ᵤ b :=
Iff.intro Quotient.exact Quot.sound
#align associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated
theorem quotient_mk_eq_mk [Monoid α] (a : α) : ⟦a⟧ = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk [Monoid α] (a : α) : Quot.mk Setoid.r a = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.quot_mk_eq_mk Associates.quot_mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem quot_out [Monoid α] (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk (Quot.out a) = a := by
rw [← quot_mk_eq_mk, Quot.out_eq]
#align associates.quot_out Associates.quot_outₓ
theorem mk_quot_out [Monoid α] (a : α) : Quot.out (Associates.mk a) ~ᵤ a := by
rw [← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, Associates.quot_out]
theorem forall_associated [Monoid α] {p : Associates α → Prop} :
(∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, p (Associates.mk a) :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ => h _) fun h a => Quotient.inductionOn a h
#align associates.forall_associated Associates.forall_associated
theorem mk_surjective [Monoid α] : Function.Surjective (@Associates.mk α _) :=
forall_associated.2 fun a => ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align associates.mk_surjective Associates.mk_surjective
instance [Monoid α] : One (Associates α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_one [Monoid α] : Associates.mk (1 : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_one Associates.mk_one
theorem one_eq_mk_one [Monoid α] : (1 : Associates α) = Associates.mk 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.one_eq_mk_one Associates.one_eq_mk_one
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_one [Monoid α] {a : α} : Associates.mk a = 1 ↔ IsUnit a := by
rw [← mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, associated_one_iff_isUnit]
instance [Monoid α] : Bot (Associates α) :=
⟨1⟩
theorem bot_eq_one [Monoid α] : (⊥ : Associates α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.bot_eq_one Associates.bot_eq_one
theorem exists_rep [Monoid α] (a : Associates α) : ∃ a0 : α, Associates.mk a0 = a :=
Quot.exists_rep a
#align associates.exists_rep Associates.exists_rep
instance [Monoid α] [Subsingleton α] :
Unique (Associates α) where
default := 1
uniq := forall_associated.2 fun _ ↦ mk_eq_one.2 <| isUnit_of_subsingleton _
theorem mk_injective [Monoid α] [Unique (Units α)] : Function.Injective (@Associates.mk α _) :=
fun _ _ h => associated_iff_eq.mp (Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.mp h)
#align associates.mk_injective Associates.mk_injective
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
instance instMul : Mul (Associates α) :=
⟨Quotient.map₂ (· * ·) fun _ _ h₁ _ _ h₂ ↦ h₁.mul_mul h₂⟩
theorem mk_mul_mk {x y : α} : Associates.mk x * Associates.mk y = Associates.mk (x * y) :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_mul_mk Associates.mk_mul_mk
instance instCommMonoid : CommMonoid (Associates α) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
mul_one a' := Quotient.inductionOn a' fun a => show ⟦a * 1⟧ = ⟦a⟧ by simp
one_mul a' := Quotient.inductionOn a' fun a => show ⟦1 * a⟧ = ⟦a⟧ by simp
mul_assoc a' b' c' :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a' b' c' fun a b c =>
show ⟦a * b * c⟧ = ⟦a * (b * c)⟧ by rw [mul_assoc]
mul_comm a' b' :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a' b' fun a b => show ⟦a * b⟧ = ⟦b * a⟧ by rw [mul_comm]
instance instPreorder : Preorder (Associates α) where
le := Dvd.dvd
le_refl := dvd_refl
le_trans a b c := dvd_trans
/-- `Associates.mk` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
protected def mkMonoidHom : α →* Associates α where
toFun := Associates.mk
map_one' := mk_one
map_mul' _ _ := mk_mul_mk
#align associates.mk_monoid_hom Associates.mkMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem mkMonoidHom_apply (a : α) : Associates.mkMonoidHom a = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_monoid_hom_apply Associates.mkMonoidHom_apply
theorem associated_map_mk {f : Associates α →* α} (hinv : Function.RightInverse f Associates.mk)
(a : α) : a ~ᵤ f (Associates.mk a) :=
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.1 (hinv (Associates.mk a)).symm
#align associates.associated_map_mk Associates.associated_map_mk
| Mathlib/Algebra/Associated.lean | 950 | 951 | theorem mk_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : Associates.mk (a ^ n) = Associates.mk a ^ n := by |
induction n <;> simp [*, pow_succ, Associates.mk_mul_mk.symm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jalex Stark. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jalex Stark, Scott Morrison, Eric Wieser, Oliver Nash, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
#align_import data.matrix.basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"320df450e9abeb5fc6417971e75acb6ae8bc3794"
/-!
# Matrices with a single non-zero element.
This file provides `Matrix.stdBasisMatrix`. The matrix `Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j c` has `c`
at position `(i, j)`, and zeroes elsewhere.
-/
variable {l m n : Type*}
variable {R α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Matrix
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
variable [Semiring α]
/-- `stdBasisMatrix i j a` is the matrix with `a` in the `i`-th row, `j`-th column,
and zeroes elsewhere.
-/
def stdBasisMatrix (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) : Matrix m n α := fun i' j' =>
if i = i' ∧ j = j' then a else 0
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix Matrix.stdBasisMatrix
@[simp]
theorem smul_stdBasisMatrix [SMulZeroClass R α] (r : R) (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) :
r • stdBasisMatrix i j a = stdBasisMatrix i j (r • a) := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix
ext
simp [smul_ite]
#align matrix.smul_std_basis_matrix Matrix.smul_stdBasisMatrix
@[simp]
theorem stdBasisMatrix_zero (i : m) (j : n) : stdBasisMatrix i j (0 : α) = 0 := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix
ext
simp
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix_zero Matrix.stdBasisMatrix_zero
theorem stdBasisMatrix_add (i : m) (j : n) (a b : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j (a + b) = stdBasisMatrix i j a + stdBasisMatrix i j b := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix; ext
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix_add Matrix.stdBasisMatrix_add
theorem mulVec_stdBasisMatrix [Fintype m] (i : n) (j : m) (c : α) (x : m → α) :
mulVec (stdBasisMatrix i j c) x = Function.update (0 : n → α) i (c * x j) := by
ext i'
simp [stdBasisMatrix, mulVec, dotProduct]
rcases eq_or_ne i i' with rfl|h
· simp
simp [h, h.symm]
theorem matrix_eq_sum_std_basis [Fintype m] [Fintype n] (x : Matrix m n α) :
x = ∑ i : m, ∑ j : n, stdBasisMatrix i j (x i j) := by
ext i j; symm
iterate 2 rw [Finset.sum_apply]
-- Porting note: was `convert`
refine (Fintype.sum_eq_single i ?_).trans ?_; swap
· -- Porting note: `simp` seems unwilling to apply `Fintype.sum_apply`
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [stdBasisMatrix]
rw [Fintype.sum_apply, Fintype.sum_apply]
simp
· intro j' hj'
-- Porting note: `simp` seems unwilling to apply `Fintype.sum_apply`
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [stdBasisMatrix]
rw [Fintype.sum_apply, Fintype.sum_apply]
simp [hj']
#align matrix.matrix_eq_sum_std_basis Matrix.matrix_eq_sum_std_basis
-- TODO: tie this up with the `Basis` machinery of linear algebra
-- this is not completely trivial because we are indexing by two types, instead of one
-- TODO: add `std_basis_vec`
theorem std_basis_eq_basis_mul_basis (i : m) (j : n) :
stdBasisMatrix i j (1 : α) =
vecMulVec (fun i' => ite (i = i') 1 0) fun j' => ite (j = j') 1 0 := by
ext i' j'
-- Porting note: was `norm_num [std_basis_matrix, vec_mul_vec]` though there are no numerals
-- involved.
simp only [stdBasisMatrix, vecMulVec, mul_ite, mul_one, mul_zero, of_apply]
-- Porting note: added next line
simp_rw [@and_comm (i = i')]
exact ite_and _ _ _ _
#align matrix.std_basis_eq_basis_mul_basis Matrix.std_basis_eq_basis_mul_basis
-- todo: the old proof used fintypes, I don't know `Finsupp` but this feels generalizable
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' [Finite m] [Finite n] {P : Matrix m n α → Prop} (M : Matrix m n α)
(h_zero : P 0) (h_add : ∀ p q, P p → P q → P (p + q))
(h_std_basis : ∀ (i : m) (j : n) (x : α), P (stdBasisMatrix i j x)) : P M := by
cases nonempty_fintype m; cases nonempty_fintype n
rw [matrix_eq_sum_std_basis M, ← Finset.sum_product']
apply Finset.sum_induction _ _ h_add h_zero
· intros
apply h_std_basis
#align matrix.induction_on' Matrix.induction_on'
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on [Finite m] [Finite n] [Nonempty m] [Nonempty n]
{P : Matrix m n α → Prop} (M : Matrix m n α) (h_add : ∀ p q, P p → P q → P (p + q))
(h_std_basis : ∀ i j x, P (stdBasisMatrix i j x)) : P M :=
Matrix.induction_on' M
(by
inhabit m
inhabit n
simpa using h_std_basis default default 0)
h_add h_std_basis
#align matrix.induction_on Matrix.induction_on
namespace StdBasisMatrix
section
variable (i : m) (j : n) (c : α) (i' : m) (j' : n)
@[simp]
theorem apply_same : stdBasisMatrix i j c i j = c :=
if_pos (And.intro rfl rfl)
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.apply_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.apply_same
@[simp]
theorem apply_of_ne (h : ¬(i = i' ∧ j = j')) : stdBasisMatrix i j c i' j' = 0 := by
simp only [stdBasisMatrix, and_imp, ite_eq_right_iff]
tauto
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.apply_of_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem apply_of_row_ne {i i' : m} (hi : i ≠ i') (j j' : n) (a : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j a i' j' = 0 := by simp [hi]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.apply_of_row_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_row_ne
@[simp]
theorem apply_of_col_ne (i i' : m) {j j' : n} (hj : j ≠ j') (a : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j a i' j' = 0 := by simp [hj]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.apply_of_col_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_col_ne
end
section
variable (i j : n) (c : α) (i' j' : n)
@[simp]
theorem diag_zero (h : j ≠ i) : diag (stdBasisMatrix i j c) = 0 :=
funext fun _ => if_neg fun ⟨e₁, e₂⟩ => h (e₂.trans e₁.symm)
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.diag_zero Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.diag_zero
@[simp]
theorem diag_same : diag (stdBasisMatrix i i c) = Pi.single i c := by
ext j
by_cases hij : i = j <;> (try rw [hij]) <;> simp [hij]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.diag_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.diag_same
variable [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem trace_zero (h : j ≠ i) : trace (stdBasisMatrix i j c) = 0 := by
-- Porting note: added `-diag_apply`
simp [trace, -diag_apply, h]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.trace_zero Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_zero
@[simp]
theorem trace_eq : trace (stdBasisMatrix i i c) = c := by
-- Porting note: added `-diag_apply`
simp [trace, -diag_apply]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.trace_eq Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_eq
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_apply_same (b : n) (M : Matrix n n α) :
(stdBasisMatrix i j c * M) i b = c * M j b := by simp [mul_apply, stdBasisMatrix]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_left_apply_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_left_apply_same
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_apply_same (a : n) (M : Matrix n n α) :
(M * stdBasisMatrix i j c) a j = M a i * c := by simp [mul_apply, stdBasisMatrix, mul_comm]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_right_apply_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_right_apply_same
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (h : a ≠ i) (M : Matrix n n α) :
(stdBasisMatrix i j c * M) a b = 0 := by simp [mul_apply, h.symm]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_left_apply_of_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_left_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (hbj : b ≠ j) (M : Matrix n n α) :
(M * stdBasisMatrix i j c) a b = 0 := by simp [mul_apply, hbj.symm]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_right_apply_of_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_right_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem mul_same (k : n) (d : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j c * stdBasisMatrix j k d = stdBasisMatrix i k (c * d) := by
ext a b
simp only [mul_apply, stdBasisMatrix, boole_mul]
by_cases h₁ : i = a <;> by_cases h₂ : k = b <;> simp [h₁, h₂]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_same Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_same
@[simp]
theorem mul_of_ne {k l : n} (h : j ≠ k) (d : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j c * stdBasisMatrix k l d = 0 := by
ext a b
simp only [mul_apply, boole_mul, stdBasisMatrix]
by_cases h₁ : i = a
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [h₁, h, h.symm]`
· simp only [h₁, true_and, mul_ite, ite_mul, zero_mul, mul_zero, ← ite_and, zero_apply]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero (fun x _ => ?_)
apply if_neg
rintro ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩, h⟩
contradiction
· simp only [h₁, false_and, ite_false, mul_ite, zero_mul, mul_zero, ite_self,
Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_apply]
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix.mul_of_ne Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.mul_of_ne
end
end StdBasisMatrix
section Commute
variable [Fintype n]
theorem row_eq_zero_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix {i j k : n} {M : Matrix n n α}
(hM : Commute (stdBasisMatrix i j 1) M) (hkj : k ≠ j) : M j k = 0 := by
have := ext_iff.mpr hM i k
aesop
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basis.lean | 236 | 239 | theorem col_eq_zero_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix {i j k : n} {M : Matrix n n α}
(hM : Commute (stdBasisMatrix i j 1) M) (hki : k ≠ i) : M k i = 0 := by |
have := ext_iff.mpr hM k j
aesop
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import topology.instances.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ec4b2eeb50364487f80421c0b4c41328a611f30d"
/-!
# Topology on extended non-negative reals
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric Function
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0} {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set ℝ≥0∞}
section TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
/-- Topology on `ℝ≥0∞`.
Note: this is different from the `EMetricSpace` topology. The `EMetricSpace` topology has
`IsOpen {∞}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0∞ := Preorder.topology ℝ≥0∞
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : T2Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T5Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T4Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0∞ :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.secondCountableTopology
instance : MetrizableSpace ENNReal :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.metrizableSpace
theorem embedding_coe : Embedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
coe_strictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected <| by rw [range_coe']; exact ordConnected_Iio
#align ennreal.embedding_coe ENNReal.embedding_coe
theorem isOpen_ne_top : IsOpen { a : ℝ≥0∞ | a ≠ ∞ } := isOpen_ne
#align ennreal.is_open_ne_top ENNReal.isOpen_ne_top
theorem isOpen_Ico_zero : IsOpen (Ico 0 b) := by
rw [ENNReal.Ico_eq_Iio]
exact isOpen_Iio
#align ennreal.is_open_Ico_zero ENNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
⟨embedding_coe, by rw [range_coe']; exact isOpen_Iio⟩
#align ennreal.open_embedding_coe ENNReal.openEmbedding_coe
theorem coe_range_mem_nhds : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range <| mem_range_self _
#align ennreal.coe_range_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_range_mem_nhds
@[norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ≥0∞)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe ENNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
embedding_coe.continuous
#align ennreal.continuous_coe ENNReal.continuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe_iff {α} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(Continuous fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ Continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_coe_iff ENNReal.continuous_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) = (𝓝 r).map (↑) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq r).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe
theorem tendsto_nhds_coe_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ↑x) l ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) (𝓝 x) l := by
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
theorem continuousAt_coe_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
ContinuousAt f ↑x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) x :=
tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
#align ennreal.continuous_at_coe_iff ENNReal.continuousAt_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe_coe {r p : ℝ≥0} :
𝓝 ((r : ℝ≥0∞), (p : ℝ≥0∞)) = (𝓝 (r, p)).map fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0 => (↑p.1, ↑p.2) :=
((openEmbedding_coe.prod openEmbedding_coe).map_nhds_eq (r, p)).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe_coe
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ENNReal.ofReal :=
(continuous_coe_iff.2 continuous_id).comp continuous_real_toNNReal
#align ennreal.continuous_of_real ENNReal.continuous_ofReal
theorem tendsto_ofReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun a => ENNReal.ofReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal a)) :=
(continuous_ofReal.tendsto a).comp h
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal
theorem tendsto_toNNReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto ENNReal.toNNReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toNNReal) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact tendsto_id
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal
theorem eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfi : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ∞) (hgi : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≠ ∞)
(hfg : (fun x => (f x).toReal) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x).toReal) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by
filter_upwards [hfi, hgi, hfg] with _ hfx hgx _
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal hfx hgx]
#align ennreal.eventually_eq_of_to_real_eventually_eq ENNReal.eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq
theorem continuousOn_toNNReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toNNReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } := fun _a ha =>
ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (tendsto_toNNReal ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_on_to_nnreal ENNReal.continuousOn_toNNReal
theorem tendsto_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toReal) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| tendsto_toNNReal ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real ENNReal.tendsto_toReal
lemma continuousOn_toReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp_continuousOn continuousOn_toNNReal
lemma continuousAt_toReal (hx : x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousAt ENNReal.toReal x :=
continuousOn_toReal.continuousAt (isOpen_ne_top.mem_nhds_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def neTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 where
toEquiv := neTopEquivNNReal
continuous_toFun := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_toNNReal
continuous_invFun := continuous_coe.subtype_mk _
#align ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.neTopHomeomorphNNReal
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ltTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a < ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 := by
refine (Homeomorph.setCongr ?_).trans neTopHomeomorphNNReal
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
#align ennreal.lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.ltTopHomeomorphNNReal
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ ∞), 𝓟 (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans <| by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
#align ennreal.nhds_top ENNReal.nhds_top
theorem nhds_top' : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ r : ℝ≥0, 𝓟 (Ioi ↑r) :=
nhds_top.trans <| iInf_ne_top _
#align ennreal.nhds_top' ENNReal.nhds_top'
theorem nhds_top_basis : (𝓝 ∞).HasBasis (fun a => a < ∞) fun a => Ioi a :=
_root_.nhds_top_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_top_basis ENNReal.nhds_top_basis
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ x : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑x < m a := by
simp only [nhds_top', tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.trans
⟨fun h n => by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_natCast] using h n, fun h x =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt x
(h n).mono fun y => lt_trans <| by rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, coe_lt_coe]⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat
theorem tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat.2 h
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_nat_nhds_top : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ↑n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top fun n =>
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n + 1, fun _m hm => mem_setOf.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_nhds_top {f : α → ℝ≥0} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) l (𝓝 ∞) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal, atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_right_iff]; simp
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_ofReal_atTop : Tendsto ENNReal.ofReal atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Iio]
#align ennreal.nhds_zero ENNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis
theorem nhds_zero_basis_Iic : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) Iic :=
nhds_bot_basis_Iic
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add a TC for `≠ ∞`?
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot {r : ℝ≥0} : (𝓝[>] (r : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨∞, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_coe_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot : (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_zero_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_one_neBot : (𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_nat_neBot (n : ℕ) : (𝓝[>] (n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_ofNat_nebot (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(𝓝[>] (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NeZero x] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' ⟨0, NeZero.pos x⟩
/-- Closed intervals `Set.Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)`, `ε ≠ 0`, form a basis of neighborhoods of an
extended nonnegative real number `x ≠ ∞`. We use `Set.Icc` instead of `Set.Ioo` because this way the
statement works for `x = 0`.
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (· ≠ 0) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
rcases (zero_le x).eq_or_gt with rfl | x0
· simp_rw [zero_tsub, zero_add, ← bot_eq_zero, Icc_bot, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
exact nhds_bot_basis_Iic
· refine (nhds_basis_Ioo' ⟨_, x0⟩ ⟨_, xt.lt_top⟩).to_hasBasis ?_ fun ε ε0 => ?_
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩
rcases exists_between (tsub_pos_of_lt ha) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 hb with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min ε δ, (lt_min ε0 (coe_pos.2 δ0)).ne', Icc_subset_Ioo ?_ ?_⟩
· exact lt_tsub_comm.2 ((min_le_left _ _).trans_lt hε)
· exact (add_le_add_left (min_le_right _ _) _).trans_lt hδ
· exact ⟨(x - ε, x + ε), ⟨ENNReal.sub_lt_self xt x0.ne' ε0,
lt_add_right xt ε0⟩, Ioo_subset_Icc_self⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt
theorem Icc_mem_nhds (xt : x ≠ ∞) (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) : Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt).mem_of_mem ε0
#align ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top xt).eq_biInf
#align ennreal.nhds_of_ne_top ENNReal.nhds_of_ne_top
theorem biInf_le_nhds : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) ≤ 𝓝 x
| ∞ => iInf₂_le_of_le 1 one_pos <| by
simpa only [← coe_one, top_sub_coe, top_add, Icc_self, principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds _
| (x : ℝ≥0) => (nhds_of_ne_top coe_ne_top).ge
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_of_Icc {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)) : Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) := by
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (biInf_le_nhds _)
simpa only [tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ℝ≥0∞` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) := by
simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds ENNReal.tendsto_nhds
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_zero {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ ε :=
nhds_zero_basis_Iic.tendsto_right_iff
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero
protected theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top ha)) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop
instance : ContinuousAdd ℝ≥0∞ := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_⟩
rintro ⟨_ | a, b⟩
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_fst fun p => le_add_right le_rfl
rcases b with (_ | b)
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_snd fun p => le_add_left le_rfl
simp only [ContinuousAt, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_add, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·),
tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
protected theorem tendsto_atTop_zero [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ≤ ε :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_zero_basis_Iic) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem tendsto_sub : ∀ {a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a - b))
| ∞, ∞, h => by simp only [ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_self] at h
| ∞, (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
rw [top_sub_coe, tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
refine fun x => ((lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (b + 1 + x)).prod_nhds
(ge_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one b)).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left]
calc y.2 + x ≤ ↑(b + 1) + x := add_le_add_right hy.2 _
_ < y.1 := hy.1
| (a : ℝ≥0), ∞, _ => by
rw [sub_top]
refine (tendsto_pure.2 ?_).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
exact ((gt_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one a).prod_nhds
(lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (a + 1))).mono fun x hx =>
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (hx.1.trans hx.2).le
| (a : ℝ≥0), (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, ← ENNReal.coe_sub, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_coe]
exact continuous_sub.tendsto (a, b)
#align ennreal.tendsto_sub ENNReal.tendsto_sub
protected theorem Tendsto.sub {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun a => ma a - mb a) f (𝓝 (a - b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a - b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_sub h) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.sub ENNReal.Tendsto.sub
protected theorem tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
have ht : ∀ b : ℝ≥0∞, b ≠ 0 →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (∞, b)) (𝓝 ∞) := fun b hb => by
refine tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.2 fun n => ?_
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε, hε, hεb⟩
have : ∀ᶠ c : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝 (∞, b), ↑n / ↑ε < c.1 ∧ ↑ε < c.2 :=
(lt_mem_nhds <| div_lt_top coe_ne_top hε.ne').prod_nhds (lt_mem_nhds hεb)
refine this.mono fun c hc => ?_
exact (ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hε.ne' coe_ne_top).symm.trans_lt (mul_lt_mul hc.1 hc.2)
induction a with
| top => simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at hb; simp [ht b hb, top_mul hb]
| coe a =>
induction b with
| top =>
simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at ha
simpa [(· ∘ ·), mul_comm, mul_top ha]
using (ht a ha).comp (continuous_swap.tendsto (ofNNReal a, ∞))
| coe b =>
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_mul, tendsto_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_mul]
#align ennreal.tendsto_mul ENNReal.tendsto_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a * b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul ENNReal.Tendsto.mul
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun x hx =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (hf x hx) (h₁ x hx) (hg x hx) (h₂ x hx)
#align continuous_on.ennreal_mul ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul
theorem _root_.Continuous.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h₁ : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) :
Continuous fun x => f x * g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul hf.continuousAt (h₁ x) hg.continuousAt (h₂ x)
#align continuous.ennreal_mul Continuous.ennreal_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.const_mul {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases (fun (this : a = 0) => by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (Or.inl ha) hm hb
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun x => m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul hm ha
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul_const ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const
theorem tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : Filter α} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(s : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) x (𝓝 (a i))) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, a i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun b => ∏ c ∈ s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c ∈ s, a c)) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has IH
· simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
simp only [Finset.prod_insert has]
apply Tendsto.mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
· right
exact (prod_lt_top fun i hi => h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)).ne
· exact IH (fun i hi => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi =>
h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· exact Or.inr (h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
#align ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top
protected theorem continuousAt_const_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (a * ·) b :=
Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_const_mul ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul
protected theorem continuousAt_mul_const {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x * a) b :=
Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_mul_const ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_const_mul {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a * ·) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_const_mul ENNReal.continuous_const_mul
protected theorem continuous_mul_const {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous fun x => x * a :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_mul_const ENNReal.continuous_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_div_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) (c_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
exact ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.intro_left _ (inv_ne_top.mpr c_ne_zero))
#align ennreal.continuous_div_const ENNReal.continuous_div_const
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_pow (n : ℕ) : Continuous fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => a ^ n := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [continuous_const]
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_one, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (IH.tendsto _) ?_ tendsto_id ?_ <;> by_cases H : x = 0
· simp only [H, zero_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
· exact Or.inl fun h => H (pow_eq_zero h)
· simp only [H, pow_eq_top_iff, zero_ne_top, false_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
not_false_iff, false_and_iff]
· simp only [H, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_pow ENNReal.continuous_pow
theorem continuousOn_sub :
ContinuousOn (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) { p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ | p ≠ ⟨∞, ∞⟩ } := by
rw [ContinuousOn]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hp
simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hp
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_sub (not_and_or.mp hp))
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub ENNReal.continuousOn_sub
theorem continuous_sub_left {a : ℝ≥0∞} (a_ne_top : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a - ·) := by
change Continuous (Function.uncurry Sub.sub ∘ (a, ·))
refine continuousOn_sub.comp_continuous (Continuous.Prod.mk a) fun x => ?_
simp only [a_ne_top, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.continuous_sub_left
theorem continuous_nnreal_sub {a : ℝ≥0} : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => (a : ℝ≥0∞) - x :=
continuous_sub_left coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.continuous_nnreal_sub ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub
theorem continuousOn_sub_left (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ContinuousOn (a - ·) { x : ℝ≥0∞ | x ≠ ∞ } := by
rw [show (fun x => a - x) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨a, x⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp continuousOn_sub (Continuous.continuousOn (Continuous.Prod.mk a))
rintro _ h (_ | _)
exact h none_eq_top
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub_left ENNReal.continuousOn_sub_left
theorem continuous_sub_right (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x - a := by
by_cases a_infty : a = ∞
· simp [a_infty, continuous_const]
· rw [show (fun x => x - a) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨x, a⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_sub (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const)
intro x
simp only [a_infty, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_false_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_right ENNReal.continuous_sub_right
protected theorem Tendsto.pow {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => m x ^ n) f (𝓝 (a ^ n)) :=
((continuous_pow n).tendsto a).comp hm
#align ennreal.tendsto.pow ENNReal.Tendsto.pow
theorem le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a < 1, a * x ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
have : Tendsto (· * x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 (1 * x)) :=
(ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inr one_ne_zero)).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [one_mul] at this
exact le_of_tendsto this (eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall h)
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le
theorem iInf_mul_left' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i := by
by_cases H : a = ∞ ∧ ⨅ i, f i = 0
· rcases h H.1 H.2 with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [H.2, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
exact fun b hb => ⟨i, by rwa [hi, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero]⟩
· rw [not_and_or] at H
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, iInf_of_empty, mul_top]
exact mt h0 (not_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›)
· exact (ENNReal.mul_left_mono.map_iInf_of_continuousAt'
(ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul H)).symm
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left' ENNReal.iInf_mul_left'
theorem iInf_mul_left {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_mul_left' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left ENNReal.iInf_mul_left
theorem iInf_mul_right' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a := by
simpa only [mul_comm a] using iInf_mul_left' h h0
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right' ENNReal.iInf_mul_right'
theorem iInf_mul_right {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a :=
iInf_mul_right' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right ENNReal.iInf_mul_right
theorem inv_map_iInf {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iInf x)⁻¹ = ⨆ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iInf x
#align ennreal.inv_map_infi ENNReal.inv_map_iInf
theorem inv_map_iSup {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iSup x)⁻¹ = ⨅ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iSup x
#align ennreal.inv_map_supr ENNReal.inv_map_iSup
theorem inv_limsup {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(limsup x l)⁻¹ = liminf (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.limsup_apply
#align ennreal.inv_limsup ENNReal.inv_limsup
theorem inv_liminf {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(liminf x l)⁻¹ = limsup (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.liminf_apply
#align ennreal.inv_liminf ENNReal.inv_liminf
instance : ContinuousInv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨OrderIso.invENNReal.continuous⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to `[InvolutiveInv _] [ContinuousInv _]`
protected theorem tendsto_inv_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun x => (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using Tendsto.inv h, Tendsto.inv⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff
protected theorem Tendsto.div {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a / mb a) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul hma _ (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hmb) _ <;> simp [ha, hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div ENNReal.Tendsto.div
protected theorem Tendsto.const_div {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a / m b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.const_mul (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hm)
simp [hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_div ENNReal.Tendsto.const_div
protected theorem Tendsto.div_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x => m x / b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul_const hm
simp [ha]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div_const ENNReal.Tendsto.div_const
protected theorem tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.inv_top ▸ ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : iSup s + a = ⨆ b, s b + a :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) <|
monotone_id.add monotone_const
#align ennreal.supr_add ENNReal.iSup_add
theorem biSup_add' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + a = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i + a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 h
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_add]
#align ennreal.bsupr_add' ENNReal.biSup_add'
theorem add_biSup' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), a + f i := by
simp only [add_comm a, biSup_add' h]
#align ennreal.add_bsupr' ENNReal.add_biSup'
theorem biSup_add {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + a = ⨆ i ∈ s, f i + a :=
biSup_add' hs
#align ennreal.bsupr_add ENNReal.biSup_add
theorem add_biSup {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ i ∈ s, f i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, a + f i :=
add_biSup' hs
#align ennreal.add_bsupr ENNReal.add_biSup
theorem sSup_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s + a = ⨆ b ∈ s, b + a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_add hs]
#align ennreal.Sup_add ENNReal.sSup_add
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : a + iSup s = ⨆ b, a + s b := by
rw [add_comm, iSup_add]; simp [add_comm]
#align ennreal.add_supr ENNReal.add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_le {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞}
{a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, f i + g j ≤ a) : iSup f + iSup g ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_add, add_iSup]; exact iSup₂_le h
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_le ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_le
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {q : ι' → Prop} (hp : ∃ i, p i) (hq : ∃ j, q j)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, q j → f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + ⨆ (j) (_ : q j), g j) ≤ a := by
simp_rw [biSup_add' hp, add_biSup' hq]
exact iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup₂_le (h i hi)
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le' ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le'
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le {ι ι'} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ t, f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) ≤ a :=
biSup_add_biSup_le' hs ht h
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le
theorem iSup_add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp only [iSup_of_empty, bot_eq_zero, zero_add]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun a => add_le_add (le_iSup _ _) (le_iSup _ _))
refine iSup_add_iSup_le fun i j => ?_
rcases h i j with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact le_iSup_of_le k hk
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup ι] {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : Monotone g) : iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a :=
iSup_add_iSup fun i j => ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add (hf <| le_sup_left) (hg <| le_sup_right)⟩
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_of_monotone ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone
theorem finset_sum_iSup_nat {α} {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] {s : Finset α} {f : α → ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ a, Monotone (f a)) : (∑ a ∈ s, iSup (f a)) = ⨆ n, ∑ a ∈ s, f a n := by
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a s has ih
simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [ih, iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone (hf a)]
intro i j h
exact Finset.sum_le_sum fun a _ => hf a h
#align ennreal.finset_sum_supr_nat ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat
theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * iSup f = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· obtain rfl : f = fun _ => 0 := funext hf
simp only [iSup_zero_eq_zero, mul_zero]
· refine (monotone_id.const_mul' _).map_iSup_of_continuousAt ?_ (mul_zero a)
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id (Or.inl ?_)
exact mt iSup_eq_zero.1 hf
#align ennreal.mul_supr ENNReal.mul_iSup
theorem mul_sSup {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, a * i := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.mul_Sup ENNReal.mul_sSup
theorem iSup_mul {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]; congr; funext; rw [mul_comm]
#align ennreal.supr_mul ENNReal.iSup_mul
theorem smul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (f : ι → ℝ≥0∞)
(c : R) : (c • ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, c • f i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `iSup _` with `iSup f`
simp only [← smul_one_mul c (f _), ← smul_one_mul c (iSup f), ENNReal.mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.smul_supr ENNReal.smul_iSup
theorem smul_sSup {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (c : R) :
c • sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, c • i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `_` with `s`
simp_rw [← smul_one_mul c (sSup s), ENNReal.mul_sSup, smul_one_mul]
#align ennreal.smul_Sup ENNReal.smul_sSup
theorem iSup_div {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f / a = ⨆ i, f i / a :=
iSup_mul
#align ennreal.supr_div ENNReal.iSup_div
protected theorem tendsto_coe_sub {b : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun b : ℝ≥0∞ => ↑r - b) (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (↑r - b)) :=
continuous_nnreal_sub.tendsto _
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_sub ENNReal.tendsto_coe_sub
theorem sub_iSup {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {b : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a < ∞) :
(a - ⨆ i, b i) = ⨅ i, a - b i :=
antitone_const_tsub.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuous_sub_left hr.ne).continuousAt
#align ennreal.sub_supr ENNReal.sub_iSup
theorem exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ 0 ∉ s ∧ ∞ ∉ s := by
obtain ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, hs⟩ :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∉ s) ∧ ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∉ s :=
exists_countable_dense_no_bot_top ℝ≥0∞
exact ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, fun h => hs.1 0 (by simp) h, fun h => hs.2 ∞ (by simp) h⟩
#align ennreal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
theorem exists_lt_add_of_lt_add {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x < y + z) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
∃ y' z', y' < y ∧ z' < z ∧ x < y' + z' := by
have : NeZero y := ⟨hy⟩
have : NeZero z := ⟨hz⟩
have A : Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 + p.2) (𝓝[<] y ×ˢ 𝓝[<] z) (𝓝 (y + z)) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ (Filter.prod_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
rw [← nhds_prod_eq]
exact tendsto_add
rcases ((A.eventually (lt_mem_nhds h)).and
(Filter.prod_mem_prod self_mem_nhdsWithin self_mem_nhdsWithin)).exists with
⟨⟨y', z'⟩, hx, hy', hz'⟩
exact ⟨y', z', hy', hz', hx⟩
#align ennreal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add ENNReal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add
theorem ofReal_cinfi (f : α → ℝ) [Nonempty α] :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ENNReal.ofReal (f i) := by
by_cases hf : BddBelow (range f)
· exact
Monotone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
(fun i j hij => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hij) hf
· symm
rw [Real.iInf_of_not_bddBelow hf, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ← ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
obtain ⟨y, hy_mem, hy_neg⟩ := not_bddBelow_iff.mp hf 0
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := mem_range.mpr hy_mem
refine fun x hx => ⟨i, ?_⟩
rwa [ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hy_neg.le]
#align ennreal.of_real_cinfi ENNReal.ofReal_cinfi
end TopologicalSpace
section Liminf
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, x n < R := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h r] with i hi using hi.trans (le_abs_self (x i))
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, R < x n := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h (-r)] with i hi using(le_neg.1 hi).trans (neg_le_abs _)
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top'
theorem exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hf : liminf (fun i => (Real.nnabs (x i) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞)
(hbdd : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun i => |x i|) :
∃ a b : ℚ, a < b ∧ (∃ᶠ i in l, x i < a) ∧ ∃ᶠ i in l, ↑b < x i := by
rw [isBoundedUnder_le_abs, not_and_or] at hbdd
obtain hbdd | hbdd := hbdd
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_gt R
refine ⟨q, q + 1, (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le hq (not_lt.1 hx)).le
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q + 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_lt R
refine ⟨q - 1, q, (sub_lt_self_iff _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q - 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 ((not_lt.1 hx).trans hq.le)
#align ennreal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under ENNReal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under
end Liminf
section tsum
variable {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
@[norm_cast]
protected theorem hasSum_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum (fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↑r ↔ HasSum f r := by
simp only [HasSum, ← coe_finset_sum, tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.has_sum_coe ENNReal.hasSum_coe
protected theorem tsum_coe_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0} (h : HasSum f r) : (∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = r :=
(ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 h).tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq
protected theorem coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : Summable f → ↑(tsum f) = ∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)
| ⟨r, hr⟩ => by rw [hr.tsum_eq, ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq hr]
#align ennreal.coe_tsum ENNReal.coe_tsum
protected theorem hasSum : HasSum f (⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a) :=
tendsto_atTop_iSup fun _ _ => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset
#align ennreal.has_sum ENNReal.hasSum
@[simp]
protected theorem summable : Summable f :=
⟨_, ENNReal.hasSum⟩
#align ennreal.summable ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable {f : β → ℝ≥0} : (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ENNReal.coe_tsum h ▸ ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
lift ∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞) to ℝ≥0 using h with a ha
refine ⟨a, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 ?_⟩
rw [ha]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum : ∑' a, f a = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a :=
ENNReal.hasSum.tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : ι → Finset α) (hs : ∀ t, ∃ i, t ⊆ s i) :
∑' a, f a = ⨆ i, ∑ a ∈ s i, f a := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
symm
change ⨆ i : ι, (fun t : Finset α => ∑ a ∈ t, f a) (s i) = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a
exact (Finset.sum_mono_set f).iSup_comp_eq hs
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum'
protected theorem tsum_sigma {β : α → Type*} (f : ∀ a, β a → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma ENNReal.tsum_sigma
protected theorem tsum_sigma' {β : α → Type*} (f : (Σa, β a) → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma' ENNReal.tsum_sigma'
protected theorem tsum_prod {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod ENNReal.tsum_prod
protected theorem tsum_prod' {f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f (a, b) :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod' ENNReal.tsum_prod'
protected theorem tsum_comm {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' a, ∑' b, f a b = ∑' b, ∑' a, f a b :=
tsum_comm' ENNReal.summable (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_comm ENNReal.tsum_comm
protected theorem tsum_add : ∑' a, (f a + g a) = ∑' a, f a + ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_add ENNReal.tsum_add
protected theorem tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : ∑' a, f a ≤ ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_le_tsum h ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_le_tsum ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum
@[gcongr]
protected theorem _root_.GCongr.ennreal_tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : tsum f ≤ tsum g :=
ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum h
protected theorem sum_le_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (s : Finset α) : ∑ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
sum_le_tsum s (fun _ _ => zero_le _) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.sum_le_tsum ENNReal.sum_le_tsum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat' {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {N : ℕ → ℕ} (hN : Tendsto N atTop atTop) :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range (N i), f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ fun t =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := t.exists_nat_subset_range
let ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop hN 0 n
⟨k, Finset.Subset.trans hn (Finset.range_mono hk)⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat'
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range i, f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = liminf (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.liminf_eq.symm
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_limsup_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = limsup (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.limsup_eq.symm
protected theorem le_tsum (a : α) : f a ≤ ∑' a, f a :=
le_tsum' ENNReal.summable a
#align ennreal.le_tsum ENNReal.le_tsum
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_eq_zero : ∑' i, f i = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 :=
tsum_eq_zero_iff ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_zero ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero
protected theorem tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top : (∃ a, f a = ∞) → ∑' a, f a = ∞
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => top_unique <| ha ▸ ENNReal.le_tsum a
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top
protected theorem lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top {a : α → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞) (j : α) :
a j < ∞ := by
contrapose! tsum_ne_top with h
exact ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨j, top_unique h⟩
#align ennreal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_top [Nonempty α] : ∑' _ : α, ∞ = ∞ :=
let ⟨a⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_top ENNReal.tsum_top
theorem tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero {α : Type*} [Infinite α] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
∑' _ : α, c = ∞ := by
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c) atTop (𝓝 (∞ * c)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_nat_nhds_top
simp only [true_or_iff, top_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff]
have B : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c ≤ ∑' _ : α, c := fun n => by
rcases Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n with ⟨s, hs⟩
simpa [hs] using @ENNReal.sum_le_tsum α (fun _ => c) s
simpa [hc] using le_of_tendsto' A B
#align ennreal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero
protected theorem ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (h : ∑' a, f a ≠ ∞) (a : α) : f a ≠ ∞ := fun ha =>
h <| ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, ha⟩
#align ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top
protected theorem tsum_mul_left : ∑' i, a * f i = a * ∑' i, f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· simp [hf]
· rw [← ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero] at hf
have : Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑ j ∈ s, a * f j) atTop (𝓝 (a * ∑' i, f i)) := by
simp only [← Finset.mul_sum]
exact ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.summable.hasSum (Or.inl hf)
exact HasSum.tsum_eq this
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_left ENNReal.tsum_mul_left
protected theorem tsum_mul_right : ∑' i, f i * a = (∑' i, f i) * a := by
simp [mul_comm, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_right ENNReal.tsum_mul_right
protected theorem tsum_const_smul {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (a : R) :
∑' i, a • f i = a • ∑' i, f i := by
simpa only [smul_one_mul] using @ENNReal.tsum_mul_left _ (a • (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) _
#align ennreal.tsum_const_smul ENNReal.tsum_const_smul
@[simp]
theorem tsum_iSup_eq {α : Type*} (a : α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} : (∑' b : α, ⨆ _ : a = b, f b) = f a :=
(tsum_eq_single a fun _ h => by simp [h.symm]).trans <| by simp
#align ennreal.tsum_supr_eq ENNReal.tsum_iSup_eq
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
refine ⟨HasSum.tendsto_sum_nat, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [← iSup_eq_of_tendsto _ h, ← ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat]
· exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
· exact fun s t hst => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset (Finset.range_subset.2 hst)
#align ennreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem tendsto_nat_tsum (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) := by
rw [← hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_tsum ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum
theorem toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) (x : α) :
(((ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) x : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = f x :=
coe_toNNReal <| ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf _
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) :
Summable (ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) := by
simpa only [← tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top hf] using hf
#align ennreal.summable_to_nnreal_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 0) := by
have f_ne_top : ∀ n, f n ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
have h_f_coe : f = fun n => ((f n).toNNReal : ENNReal) :=
funext fun n => (coe_toNNReal (f_ne_top n)).symm
rw [h_f_coe, ← @coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact NNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_summable (summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top hf)
#align ennreal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
exact tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top hf
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- The sum over the complement of a finset tends to `0` when the finset grows to cover the whole
space. This does not need a summability assumption, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑' b : { x // x ∉ s }, f b) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
convert ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 (NNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero f)
rw [ENNReal.coe_tsum]
exact NNReal.summable_comp_injective (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hf) Subtype.coe_injective
#align ennreal.tendsto_tsum_compl_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero
protected theorem tsum_apply {ι α : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : α} :
(∑' i, f i) x = ∑' i, f i x :=
tsum_apply <| Pi.summable.mpr fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_apply ENNReal.tsum_apply
theorem tsum_sub {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : ∑' i, g i ≠ ∞) (h₂ : g ≤ f) :
∑' i, (f i - g i) = ∑' i, f i - ∑' i, g i :=
have : ∀ i, f i - g i + g i = f i := fun i => tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h₂ i)
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h₁ <| by simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_add, this]
#align ennreal.tsum_sub ENNReal.tsum_sub
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' x, g (f x) ≤ ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj f hf (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable
ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' y, g y ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) :=
calc ∑' y, g y = ∑' y, g (f (surjInv hf y)) := by simp only [surjInv_eq hf]
_ ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) := tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf) _
theorem tsum_mono_subtype (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∑' x : s, f x ≤ ∑' x : t, f x :=
tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (inclusion_injective h) _
#align ennreal.tsum_mono_subtype ENNReal.tsum_mono_subtype
theorem tsum_iUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' x : Σ i, t i, f x.2 :=
tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective (sigmaToiUnion_surjective t) _
_ = ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x := ENNReal.tsum_sigma' _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s , t i, f x ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x = ∑' x : ⋃ i : s, t i, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ <| by simp
_ ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x := tsum_iUnion_le_tsum _ _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
(tsum_biUnion_le_tsum f s.toSet t).trans_eq (Finset.tsum_subtype s fun i => ∑' x : t i, f x)
#align ennreal.tsum_bUnion_le ENNReal.tsum_biUnion_le
theorem tsum_iUnion_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i, ∑' x : t i, f x := by
rw [← tsum_fintype]
exact tsum_iUnion_le_tsum f t
#align ennreal.tsum_Union_le ENNReal.tsum_iUnion_le
theorem tsum_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x ≤ ∑' x : s, f x + ∑' x : t, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x = ∑' x : ⋃ b, cond b s t, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ union_eq_iUnion
_ ≤ _ := by simpa using tsum_iUnion_le f (cond · s t)
#align ennreal.tsum_union_le ENNReal.tsum_union_le
theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (b : β) :
∑' x, f x = f b + ∑' x, ite (x = b) 0 (f x) :=
tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' b ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite ENNReal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
theorem tsum_add_one_eq_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' n, f n = ∞) (hf0 : f 0 ≠ ∞) :
∑' n, f (n + 1) = ∞ := by
rw [tsum_eq_zero_add' ENNReal.summable, add_eq_top] at hf
exact hf.resolve_left hf0
#align ennreal.tsum_add_one_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_add_one_eq_top
/-- A sum of extended nonnegative reals which is finite can have only finitely many terms
above any positive threshold. -/
theorem finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite := by
by_contra h
have := Infinite.to_subtype h
refine tsum_ne_top (top_unique ?_)
calc ∞ = ∑' _ : { i | ε ≤ a i }, ε := (tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ε_ne_zero).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := tsum_le_tsum_of_inj (↑) Subtype.val_injective (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
(fun i => i.2) ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- Markov's inequality for `Finset.card` and `tsum` in `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
theorem finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (c_ne_top : c ≠ ∞)
(tsum_le_c : ∑' i, a i ≤ c) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite, ↑hf.toFinset.card ≤ c / ε := by
have hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite :=
finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top (ne_top_of_le_ne_top c_ne_top tsum_le_c) ε_ne_zero
refine ⟨hf, (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (.inl ε_ne_zero) (.inr c_ne_top)).2 ?_⟩
calc ↑hf.toFinset.card * ε = ∑ _i ∈ hf.toFinset, ε := by rw [Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ hf.toFinset, a i := Finset.sum_le_sum fun i => hf.mem_toFinset.1
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := ENNReal.sum_le_tsum _
_ ≤ c := tsum_le_c
#align ennreal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le ENNReal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le
theorem tsum_fiberwise (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) (g : β → γ) :
∑' x, ∑' b : g ⁻¹' {x}, f b = ∑' i, f i := by
apply HasSum.tsum_eq
let equiv := Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv g
apply (equiv.hasSum_iff.mpr ENNReal.summable.hasSum).sigma
exact fun _ ↦ ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.mpr rfl
end tsum
theorem tendsto_toReal_iff {ι} {fi : Filter ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) {x : ℝ≥0∞}
(hx : x ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun n => (f n).toReal) fi (𝓝 x.toReal) ↔ Tendsto f fi (𝓝 x) := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx
simp [tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real_iff ENNReal.tendsto_toReal_iff
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) := by
rw [NNReal.summable_coe]
exact tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe
theorem tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = ∞ ↔ ¬Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) :=
tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe.not_right
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe
theorem hasSum_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
HasSum (fun x => (f x).toReal) (∑' x, (f x).toReal) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hsum
simp only [coe_toReal, ← NNReal.coe_tsum, NNReal.hasSum_coe]
exact (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hsum).hasSum
#align ennreal.has_sum_to_real ENNReal.hasSum_toReal
theorem summable_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) : Summable fun x => (f x).toReal :=
(hasSum_toReal hsum).summable
#align ennreal.summable_to_real ENNReal.summable_toReal
end ENNReal
namespace NNReal
theorem tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum {f : β → ℝ≥0} : ∑' b, f b = (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)).toNNReal := by
by_cases h : Summable f
· rw [← ENNReal.coe_tsum h, ENNReal.toNNReal_coe]
· have A := tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable h
simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, Classical.not_not] at h
simp only [h, ENNReal.top_toNNReal, A]
#align nnreal.tsum_eq_to_nnreal_tsum NNReal.tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem exists_le_hasSum_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) (hfr : HasSum f r) :
∃ p ≤ r, HasSum g p :=
have : (∑' b, (g b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≤ r := by
refine hasSum_le (fun b => ?_) ENNReal.summable.hasSum (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 hfr)
exact ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hgf _)
let ⟨p, Eq, hpr⟩ := ENNReal.le_coe_iff.1 this
⟨p, hpr, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 <| Eq ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum⟩
#align nnreal.exists_le_has_sum_of_le NNReal.exists_le_hasSum_of_le
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem summable_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) : Summable f → Summable g
| ⟨_r, hfr⟩ =>
let ⟨_p, _, hp⟩ := exists_le_hasSum_of_le hgf hfr
hp.summable
#align nnreal.summable_of_le NNReal.summable_of_le
/-- Summable non-negative functions have countable support -/
theorem _root_.Summable.countable_support_nnreal (f : α → ℝ≥0) (h : Summable f) :
f.support.Countable := by
rw [← NNReal.summable_coe] at h
simpa [support] using h.countable_support
/-- A series of non-negative real numbers converges to `r` in the sense of `HasSum` if and only if
the sequence of partial sum converges to `r`. -/
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
rw [← ENNReal.hasSum_coe, ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_finset_sum]
exact ENNReal.tendsto_coe
#align nnreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat NNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ((tendsto_of_monotone ?_).resolve_right h).comp ?_
exacts [Finset.sum_mono_set _, tendsto_finset_range]
· rintro hnat ⟨r, hr⟩
exact not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop hnat _ (hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat.1 hr)
#align nnreal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ ¬Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
rw [← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not, not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop]
#align nnreal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : Summable f := by
refine summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop.2 fun H => ?_
rcases exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop H 0 c with ⟨n, -, hn⟩
exact lt_irrefl _ (hn.trans_le (h n))
#align nnreal.summable_of_sum_range_le NNReal.summable_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
_root_.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le (summable_of_sum_range_le h) h
#align nnreal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le NNReal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {i : β → α}
(hi : Function.Injective i) : (∑' x, f (i x)) ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj i hi (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) (summable_comp_injective hf hi)
hf
#align nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj
theorem summable_sigma {β : α → Type*} {f : (Σ x, β x) → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y => f ⟨x, y⟩) ∧ Summable fun x => ∑' y, f ⟨x, y⟩ := by
constructor
· simp only [← NNReal.summable_coe, NNReal.coe_tsum]
exact fun h => ⟨h.sigma_factor, h.sigma⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simpa only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, ENNReal.tsum_sigma',
ENNReal.coe_tsum (h₁ _)] using h₂
#align nnreal.summable_sigma NNReal.summable_sigma
theorem indicator_summable {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (s : Set α) :
Summable (s.indicator f) := by
refine NNReal.summable_of_le (fun a => le_trans (le_of_eq (s.indicator_apply f a)) ?_) hf
split_ifs
· exact le_refl (f a)
· exact zero_le_coe
#align nnreal.indicator_summable NNReal.indicator_summable
theorem tsum_indicator_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {s : Set α} (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0) :
(∑' x, (s.indicator f) x) ≠ 0 := fun h' =>
let ⟨a, ha, hap⟩ := h
hap ((Set.indicator_apply_eq_self.mpr (absurd ha)).symm.trans
((tsum_eq_zero_iff (indicator_summable hf s)).1 h' a))
#align nnreal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero NNReal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero
open Finset
/-- For `f : ℕ → ℝ≥0`, then `∑' k, f (k + i)` tends to zero. This does not require a summability
assumption on `f`, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_sum_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0) : Tendsto (fun i => ∑' k, f (k + i)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← tendsto_coe]
convert _root_.tendsto_sum_nat_add fun i => (f i : ℝ)
norm_cast
#align nnreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add NNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add
nonrec theorem hasSum_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a)
(hi : f i < g i) (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg) : sf < sg := by
have A : ∀ a : α, (f a : ℝ) ≤ g a := fun a => NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
have : (sf : ℝ) < sg := hasSum_lt A (NNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hi) (hasSum_coe.2 hf) (hasSum_coe.2 hg)
exact NNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 this
#align nnreal.has_sum_lt NNReal.hasSum_lt
@[mono]
theorem hasSum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg)
(h : f < g) : sf < sg :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
hasSum_lt hle hi hf hg
#align nnreal.has_sum_strict_mono NNReal.hasSum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_lt_tsum {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a) (hi : f i < g i)
(hg : Summable g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
hasSum_lt h hi (summable_of_le h hg).hasSum hg.hasSum
#align nnreal.tsum_lt_tsum NNReal.tsum_lt_tsum
@[mono]
theorem tsum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (h : f < g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
tsum_lt_tsum hle hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_strict_mono NNReal.tsum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_pos {g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (i : α) (hi : 0 < g i) : 0 < ∑' b, g b := by
rw [← tsum_zero]
exact tsum_lt_tsum (fun a => zero_le _) hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_pos NNReal.tsum_pos
theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (i : α) :
∑' x, f x = f i + ∑' x, ite (x = i) 0 (f x) := by
refine tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' i (NNReal.summable_of_le (fun i' => ?_) hf)
rw [Function.update_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp only [zero_le', le_rfl]
#align nnreal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite NNReal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
theorem tsum_toNNReal_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ ∞) :
(∑' a, f a).toNNReal = ∑' a, (f a).toNNReal :=
(congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal (tsum_congr fun x => (coe_toNNReal (hf x)).symm)).trans
NNReal.tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum.symm
#align ennreal.tsum_to_nnreal_eq ENNReal.tsum_toNNReal_eq
theorem tsum_toReal_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ ∞) :
(∑' a, f a).toReal = ∑' a, (f a).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, tsum_toNNReal_eq hf, NNReal.coe_tsum]
#align ennreal.tsum_to_real_eq ENNReal.tsum_toReal_eq
theorem tendsto_sum_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∑' k, f (k + i)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
replace hf : Summable f := tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hf
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_tsum, NNReal.summable_nat_add _ hf, ← ENNReal.coe_zero]
exact mod_cast NNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add f
#align ennreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add ENNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add
theorem tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
_root_.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le ENNReal.summable h
#align ennreal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le ENNReal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
theorem hasSum_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {sf sg : ℝ≥0∞} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a) (hi : f i < g i)
(hsf : sf ≠ ∞) (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg) : sf < sg := by
by_cases hsg : sg = ∞
· exact hsg.symm ▸ lt_of_le_of_ne le_top hsf
· have hg' : ∀ x, g x ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (hg.tsum_eq.symm ▸ hsg)
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using fun x =>
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (h x) <| lt_of_le_of_ne le_top (hg' x))
lift g to α → ℝ≥0 using hg'
lift sf to ℝ≥0 using hsf
lift sg to ℝ≥0 using hsg
simp only [coe_le_coe, coe_lt_coe] at h hi ⊢
exact NNReal.hasSum_lt h hi (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 hf) (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 hg)
#align ennreal.has_sum_lt ENNReal.hasSum_lt
theorem tsum_lt_tsum {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {i : α} (hfi : tsum f ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a)
(hi : f i < g i) : ∑' x, f x < ∑' x, g x :=
hasSum_lt h hi hfi ENNReal.summable.hasSum ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tsum_lt_tsum ENNReal.tsum_lt_tsum
end ENNReal
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Summable f) (hn : ∀ a, 0 ≤ f a)
{i : β → α} (hi : Function.Injective i) : tsum (f ∘ i) ≤ tsum f := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using hn
rw [NNReal.summable_coe] at hf
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), ← NNReal.coe_tsum] using NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj hf hi
#align tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj
/-- Comparison test of convergence of series of non-negative real numbers. -/
theorem Summable.of_nonneg_of_le {f g : β → ℝ} (hg : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b)
(hf : Summable f) : Summable g := by
lift f to β → ℝ≥0 using fun b => (hg b).trans (hgf b)
lift g to β → ℝ≥0 using hg
rw [NNReal.summable_coe] at hf ⊢
exact NNReal.summable_of_le (fun b => NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 (hgf b)) hf
#align summable_of_nonneg_of_le Summable.of_nonneg_of_le
theorem Summable.toNNReal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Summable f) : Summable fun n => (f n).toNNReal := by
apply NNReal.summable_coe.1
refine .of_nonneg_of_le (fun n => NNReal.coe_nonneg _) (fun n => ?_) hf.abs
simp only [le_abs_self, Real.coe_toNNReal', max_le_iff, abs_nonneg, and_self_iff]
#align summable.to_nnreal Summable.toNNReal
/-- Finitely summable non-negative functions have countable support -/
theorem _root_.Summable.countable_support_ennreal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∑' (i : α), f i ≠ ∞) :
f.support.Countable := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top h
simpa [support] using (ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 h).countable_support_nnreal
/-- A series of non-negative real numbers converges to `r` in the sense of `HasSum` if and only if
the sequence of partial sum converges to `r`. -/
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp only [HasSum, ← NNReal.coe_sum, NNReal.tendsto_coe']
exact exists_congr fun hr => NNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
#align has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg
theorem ENNReal.ofReal_tsum_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf_nonneg : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) (hf : Summable f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (∑' n, f n) = ∑' n, ENNReal.ofReal (f n) := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq (NNReal.hasSum_real_toNNReal_of_nonneg hf_nonneg hf)]
#align ennreal.of_real_tsum_of_nonneg ENNReal.ofReal_tsum_of_nonneg
section
variable [EMetricSpace β]
open ENNReal Filter EMetric
/-- In an emetric ball, the distance between points is everywhere finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball {a : β} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (x y : ball a r) : edist x.1 y.1 ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt <|
calc
edist x y ≤ edist a x + edist a y := edist_triangle_left x.1 y.1 a
_ < r + r := by rw [edist_comm a x, edist_comm a y]; exact add_lt_add x.2 y.2
_ ≤ ∞ := le_top
#align edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball
/-- Each ball in an extended metric space gives us a metric space, as the edist
is everywhere finite. -/
def metricSpaceEMetricBall (a : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : MetricSpace (ball a r) :=
EMetricSpace.toMetricSpace edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball
#align metric_space_emetric_ball metricSpaceEMetricBall
theorem nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball (a x : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (h : x ∈ ball a r) :
𝓝 x = map ((↑) : ball a r → β) (𝓝 ⟨x, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds _ <| IsOpen.mem_nhds EMetric.isOpen_ball h).symm
#align nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball
end
section
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
open EMetric
theorem tendsto_iff_edist_tendsto_0 {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} {y : α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => edist (f x) y) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [EMetric.nhds_basis_eball.tendsto_right_iff, EMetric.mem_ball,
@tendsto_order ℝ≥0∞ β _ _, forall_prop_of_false ENNReal.not_lt_zero, forall_const, true_and_iff]
#align tendsto_iff_edist_tendsto_0 tendsto_iff_edist_tendsto_0
/-- Yet another metric characterization of Cauchy sequences on integers. This one is often the
most efficient. -/
theorem EMetric.cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0 [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {s : β → α} :
CauchySeq s ↔ ∃ b : β → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ n m N : β, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N) ∧
Tendsto b atTop (𝓝 0) := EMetric.cauchySeq_iff.trans <| by
constructor
· intro hs
/- `s` is Cauchy sequence. Let `b n` be the diameter of the set `s '' Set.Ici n`. -/
refine ⟨fun N => EMetric.diam (s '' Ici N), fun n m N hn hm => ?_, ?_⟩
-- Prove that it bounds the distances of points in the Cauchy sequence
· exact EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem _ hn) (mem_image_of_mem _ hm)
-- Prove that it tends to `0`, by using the Cauchy property of `s`
· refine ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases hs ε ε0 with ⟨N, hN⟩
refine (eventually_ge_atTop N).mono fun n hn => EMetric.diam_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ _ ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩
exact (hN _ (hn.trans hk) _ (hn.trans hl)).le
· rintro ⟨b, ⟨b_bound, b_lim⟩⟩ ε εpos
have : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, b n < ε := b_lim.eventually (gt_mem_nhds εpos)
rcases this.exists with ⟨N, hN⟩
refine ⟨N, fun m hm n hn => ?_⟩
calc edist (s m) (s n) ≤ b N := b_bound m n N hm hn
_ < ε := hN
#align emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0 EMetric.cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0
theorem continuous_of_le_add_edist {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + C * edist x y) : Continuous f := by
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_of_Icc fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases ENNReal.exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt hC ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
rw [mul_comm] at hδ
filter_upwards [EMetric.closedBall_mem_nhds x (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 δ0)] with y hy
refine ⟨tsub_le_iff_right.2 <| (h x y).trans ?_, (h y x).trans ?_⟩ <;>
refine add_le_add_left (le_trans (mul_le_mul_left' ?_ _) hδ.le) _
exacts [EMetric.mem_closedBall'.1 hy, EMetric.mem_closedBall.1 hy]
#align continuous_of_le_add_edist continuous_of_le_add_edist
theorem continuous_edist : Continuous fun p : α × α => edist p.1 p.2 := by
apply continuous_of_le_add_edist 2 (by decide)
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x x' + edist x' y' + edist y' y := edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
_ = edist x' y' + (edist x x' + edist y y') := by simp only [edist_comm]; ac_rfl
_ ≤ edist x' y' + (edist (x, y) (x', y') + edist (x, y) (x', y')) :=
(add_le_add_left (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) _)
_ = edist x' y' + 2 * edist (x, y) (x', y') := by rw [← mul_two, mul_comm]
#align continuous_edist continuous_edist
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.edist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => edist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_edist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
#align continuous.edist Continuous.edist
theorem Filter.Tendsto.edist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α} (hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) : Tendsto (fun x => edist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (edist a b)) :=
(continuous_edist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
#align filter.tendsto.edist Filter.Tendsto.edist
/-- If the extended distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated
by a summable series of `NNReal`s, then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ≥0)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : Summable d) : CauchySeq f := by
refine EMetric.cauchySeq_iff_NNReal.2 fun ε εpos ↦ ?_
-- Actually we need partial sums of `d` to be a Cauchy sequence.
replace hd : CauchySeq fun n : ℕ ↦ ∑ x ∈ Finset.range n, d x :=
let ⟨_, H⟩ := hd
H.tendsto_sum_nat.cauchySeq
-- Now we take the same `N` as in one of the definitions of a Cauchy sequence.
refine (Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.1 hd ε (NNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos)).imp fun N hN n hn ↦ ?_
specialize hN n hn
-- We simplify the known inequality.
rw [dist_nndist, NNReal.nndist_eq, ← Finset.sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ hn, add_tsub_cancel_left,
NNReal.coe_lt_coe, max_lt_iff] at hN
rw [edist_comm]
-- Then use `hf` to simplify the goal to the same form.
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le hn fun _ _ ↦ hf _) ?_
exact mod_cast hN.1
#align cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_summable cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : tsum d ≠ ∞) : CauchySeq f := by
lift d to ℕ → NNReal using fun i => ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hd i
rw [ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable] at hd
exact cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable d hf hd
#align cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem EMetric.isClosed_ball {a : α} {r : ℝ≥0∞} : IsClosed (closedBall a r) :=
isClosed_le (continuous_id.edist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align emetric.is_closed_ball EMetric.isClosed_ball
@[simp]
theorem EMetric.diam_closure (s : Set α) : diam (closure s) = diam s := by
refine le_antisymm (diam_le fun x hx y hy => ?_) (diam_mono subset_closure)
have : edist x y ∈ closure (Iic (diam s)) :=
map_mem_closure₂ continuous_edist hx hy fun x hx y hy => edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy
rwa [closure_Iic] at this
#align emetric.diam_closure EMetric.diam_closure
@[simp]
theorem Metric.diam_closure {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (s : Set α) :
Metric.diam (closure s) = diam s := by simp only [Metric.diam, EMetric.diam_closure]
#align metric.diam_closure Metric.diam_closure
theorem isClosed_setOf_lipschitzOnWith {α β} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (K : ℝ≥0)
(s : Set α) : IsClosed { f : α → β | LipschitzOnWith K f s } := by
simp only [LipschitzOnWith, setOf_forall]
refine isClosed_biInter fun x _ => isClosed_biInter fun y _ => isClosed_le ?_ ?_
exacts [.edist (continuous_apply x) (continuous_apply y), continuous_const]
#align is_closed_set_of_lipschitz_on_with isClosed_setOf_lipschitzOnWith
theorem isClosed_setOf_lipschitzWith {α β} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (K : ℝ≥0) :
IsClosed { f : α → β | LipschitzWith K f } := by
simp only [← lipschitzOn_univ, isClosed_setOf_lipschitzOnWith]
#align is_closed_set_of_lipschitz_with isClosed_setOf_lipschitzWith
namespace Real
/-- For a bounded set `s : Set ℝ`, its `EMetric.diam` is equal to `sSup s - sInf s` reinterpreted as
`ℝ≥0∞`. -/
theorem ediam_eq {s : Set ℝ} (h : Bornology.IsBounded s) :
EMetric.diam s = ENNReal.ofReal (sSup s - sInf s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· simp
refine le_antisymm (Metric.ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le fun x hx y hy => ?_) ?_
· exact Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc (h.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup hx) (h.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup hy)
· apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
rw [← Metric.diam, ← Metric.diam_closure]
calc sSup s - sInf s ≤ dist (sSup s) (sInf s) := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ Metric.diam (closure s) := dist_le_diam_of_mem h.closure (csSup_mem_closure hne h.bddAbove)
(csInf_mem_closure hne h.bddBelow)
#align real.ediam_eq Real.ediam_eq
/-- For a bounded set `s : Set ℝ`, its `Metric.diam` is equal to `sSup s - sInf s`. -/
theorem diam_eq {s : Set ℝ} (h : Bornology.IsBounded s) : Metric.diam s = sSup s - sInf s := by
rw [Metric.diam, Real.ediam_eq h, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
exact sub_nonneg.2 (Real.sInf_le_sSup s h.bddBelow h.bddAbove)
#align real.diam_eq Real.diam_eq
@[simp]
theorem ediam_Ioo (a b : ℝ) : EMetric.diam (Ioo a b) = ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) := by
rcases le_or_lt b a with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· rw [Real.ediam_eq (isBounded_Ioo _ _), csSup_Ioo h, csInf_Ioo h]
#align real.ediam_Ioo Real.ediam_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem ediam_Icc (a b : ℝ) : EMetric.diam (Icc a b) = ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) := by
rcases le_or_lt a b with (h | h)
· rw [Real.ediam_eq (isBounded_Icc _ _), csSup_Icc h, csInf_Icc h]
· simp [h, h.le]
#align real.ediam_Icc Real.ediam_Icc
@[simp]
theorem ediam_Ico (a b : ℝ) : EMetric.diam (Ico a b) = ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) :=
le_antisymm (ediam_Icc a b ▸ diam_mono Ico_subset_Icc_self)
(ediam_Ioo a b ▸ diam_mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self)
#align real.ediam_Ico Real.ediam_Ico
@[simp]
theorem ediam_Ioc (a b : ℝ) : EMetric.diam (Ioc a b) = ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) :=
le_antisymm (ediam_Icc a b ▸ diam_mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
(ediam_Ioo a b ▸ diam_mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self)
#align real.ediam_Ioc Real.ediam_Ioc
theorem diam_Icc {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) : Metric.diam (Icc a b) = b - a := by
simp [Metric.diam, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 h)]
#align real.diam_Icc Real.diam_Icc
theorem diam_Ico {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) : Metric.diam (Ico a b) = b - a := by
simp [Metric.diam, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 h)]
#align real.diam_Ico Real.diam_Ico
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/ENNReal.lean | 1,576 | 1,577 | theorem diam_Ioc {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) : Metric.diam (Ioc a b) = b - a := by |
simp [Metric.diam, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 h)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Violeta Hernández Palacios, Grayson Burton, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
#align_import order.cover from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"207cfac9fcd06138865b5d04f7091e46d9320432"
/-!
# The covering relation
This file defines the covering relation in an order. `b` is said to cover `a` if `a < b` and there
is no element in between. We say that `b` weakly covers `a` if `a ≤ b` and there is no element
between `a` and `b`. In a partial order this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ a = b`, in a preorder this
is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ (a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a)`
## Notation
* `a ⋖ b` means that `b` covers `a`.
* `a ⩿ b` means that `b` weakly covers `a`.
-/
open Set OrderDual
variable {α β : Type*}
section WeaklyCovers
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
/-- `WCovBy a b` means that `a = b` or `b` covers `a`.
This means that `a ≤ b` and there is no element in between.
-/
def WCovBy (a b : α) : Prop :=
a ≤ b ∧ ∀ ⦃c⦄, a < c → ¬c < b
#align wcovby WCovBy
/-- Notation for `WCovBy a b`. -/
infixl:50 " ⩿ " => WCovBy
theorem WCovBy.le (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1
#align wcovby.le WCovBy.le
theorem WCovBy.refl (a : α) : a ⩿ a :=
⟨le_rfl, fun _ hc => hc.not_lt⟩
#align wcovby.refl WCovBy.refl
@[simp] lemma WCovBy.rfl : a ⩿ a := WCovBy.refl a
#align wcovby.rfl WCovBy.rfl
protected theorem Eq.wcovBy (h : a = b) : a ⩿ b :=
h ▸ WCovBy.rfl
#align eq.wcovby Eq.wcovBy
theorem wcovBy_of_le_of_le (h1 : a ≤ b) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h1, fun _ hac hcb => (hac.trans hcb).not_le h2⟩
#align wcovby_of_le_of_le wcovBy_of_le_of_le
alias LE.le.wcovBy_of_le := wcovBy_of_le_of_le
theorem AntisymmRel.wcovBy (h : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ b :=
wcovBy_of_le_of_le h.1 h.2
#align antisymm_rel.wcovby AntisymmRel.wcovBy
theorem WCovBy.wcovBy_iff_le (hab : a ⩿ b) : b ⩿ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h.le, fun h => h.wcovBy_of_le hab.le⟩
#align wcovby.wcovby_iff_le WCovBy.wcovBy_iff_le
theorem wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
#align wcovby_of_eq_or_eq wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_wcovBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⩿ c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans hbc.le, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
#align antisymm_rel.trans_wcovby AntisymmRel.trans_wcovBy
theorem wcovBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ c ↔ b ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_wcovBy, hab.trans_wcovBy⟩
#align wcovby_congr_left wcovBy_congr_left
theorem WCovBy.trans_antisymm_rel (hab : a ⩿ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.le.trans hbc.1, fun _ had hdc => hab.2 had <| hdc.trans_le hbc.2⟩
#align wcovby.trans_antisymm_rel WCovBy.trans_antisymm_rel
theorem wcovBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⩿ a ↔ c ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab.symm⟩
#align wcovby_congr_right wcovBy_congr_right
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_wcovBy_iff (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a ⩿ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [WCovBy, h, true_and_iff, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
#align not_wcovby_iff not_wcovBy_iff
instance WCovBy.isRefl : IsRefl α (· ⩿ ·) :=
⟨WCovBy.refl⟩
#align wcovby.is_refl WCovBy.isRefl
theorem WCovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h.2 hx.1 hx.2
#align wcovby.Ioo_eq WCovBy.Ioo_eq
theorem wcovBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align wcovby_iff_Ioo_eq wcovBy_iff_Ioo_eq
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⩿ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le' (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem WCovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⩿ f b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨f.le_iff_le.mp h.le, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
#align wcovby.of_image WCovBy.of_image
theorem WCovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⩿ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⩿ f b := by
refine ⟨f.monotone hab.le, fun c ha hb => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := h.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨ha.le, hb.le⟩
rw [f.lt_iff_lt] at ha hb
exact hab.2 ha hb
#align wcovby.image WCovBy.image
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⩿ f b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h2 => h2.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
#align set.ord_connected.apply_wcovby_apply_iff Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff
@[simp]
theorem apply_wcovBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
e a ⩿ e b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_wcovBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
#align apply_wcovby_apply_iff apply_wcovBy_apply_iff
@[simp]
theorem toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff : toDual b ⩿ toDual a ↔ a ⩿ b :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
#align to_dual_wcovby_to_dual_iff toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : ofDual a ⩿ ofDual b ↔ b ⩿ a :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
#align of_dual_wcovby_of_dual_iff ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, WCovBy.toDual⟩ := toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff
#align wcovby.to_dual WCovBy.toDual
alias ⟨_, WCovBy.ofDual⟩ := ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff
#align wcovby.of_dual WCovBy.ofDual
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.eq_or_eq (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a ≤ c) (h3 : c ≤ b) : c = a ∨ c = b := by
rcases h2.eq_or_lt with (h2 | h2); · exact Or.inl h2.symm
rcases h3.eq_or_lt with (h3 | h3); · exact Or.inr h3
exact (h.2 h2 h3).elim
#align wcovby.eq_or_eq WCovBy.eq_or_eq
/-- An `iff` version of `WCovBy.eq_or_eq` and `wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq`. -/
theorem wcovBy_iff_le_and_eq_or_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.le, fun _ => h.eq_or_eq⟩, And.rec wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq⟩
#align wcovby_iff_le_and_eq_or_eq wcovBy_iff_le_and_eq_or_eq
theorem WCovBy.le_and_le_iff (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ c ∧ c ≤ b ↔ c = a ∨ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h2 => h.eq_or_eq h2.1 h2.2, ?_⟩; rintro (rfl | rfl);
exacts [⟨le_rfl, h.le⟩, ⟨h.le, le_rfl⟩]
#align wcovby.le_and_le_iff WCovBy.le_and_le_iff
theorem WCovBy.Icc_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Icc a b = {a, b} := by
ext c
exact h.le_and_le_iff
#align wcovby.Icc_eq WCovBy.Icc_eq
theorem WCovBy.Ico_subset (h : a ⩿ b) : Ico a b ⊆ {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, h.Icc_eq, diff_singleton_subset_iff, pair_comm]
#align wcovby.Ico_subset WCovBy.Ico_subset
theorem WCovBy.Ioc_subset (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioc a b ⊆ {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, h.Icc_eq, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
#align wcovby.Ioc_subset WCovBy.Ioc_subset
end PartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.sup_eq (hac : a ⩿ c) (hbc : b ⩿ c) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊔ b = c :=
(sup_le hac.le hbc.le).eq_of_not_lt fun h =>
hab.lt_sup_or_lt_sup.elim (fun h' => hac.2 h' h) fun h' => hbc.2 h' h
#align wcovby.sup_eq WCovBy.sup_eq
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.inf_eq (hca : c ⩿ a) (hcb : c ⩿ b) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊓ b = c :=
(le_inf hca.le hcb.le).eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.inf_lt_or_inf_lt.elim (hca.2 h) (hcb.2 h)
#align wcovby.inf_eq WCovBy.inf_eq
end SemilatticeInf
end WeaklyCovers
section LT
variable [LT α] {a b : α}
/-- `CovBy a b` means that `b` covers `a`: `a < b` and there is no element in between. -/
def CovBy (a b : α) : Prop :=
a < b ∧ ∀ ⦃c⦄, a < c → ¬c < b
#align covby CovBy
/-- Notation for `CovBy a b`. -/
infixl:50 " ⋖ " => CovBy
theorem CovBy.lt (h : a ⋖ b) : a < b :=
h.1
#align covby.lt CovBy.lt
/-- If `a < b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_covBy_iff (h : a < b) : ¬a ⋖ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [CovBy, h, true_and_iff, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
#align not_covby_iff not_covBy_iff
alias ⟨exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy, _⟩ := not_covBy_iff
#align exists_lt_lt_of_not_covby exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy
alias LT.lt.exists_lt_lt := exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy
/-- In a dense order, nothing covers anything. -/
theorem not_covBy [DenselyOrdered α] : ¬a ⋖ b := fun h =>
let ⟨_, hc⟩ := exists_between h.1
h.2 hc.1 hc.2
#align not_covby not_covBy
theorem denselyOrdered_iff_forall_not_covBy : DenselyOrdered α ↔ ∀ a b : α, ¬a ⋖ b :=
⟨fun h _ _ => @not_covBy _ _ _ _ h, fun h =>
⟨fun _ _ hab => exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy hab <| h _ _⟩⟩
#align densely_ordered_iff_forall_not_covby denselyOrdered_iff_forall_not_covBy
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-04")]
alias densely_ordered_iff_forall_not_covBy := denselyOrdered_iff_forall_not_covBy
@[simp]
theorem toDual_covBy_toDual_iff : toDual b ⋖ toDual a ↔ a ⋖ b :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
#align to_dual_covby_to_dual_iff toDual_covBy_toDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : ofDual a ⋖ ofDual b ↔ b ⋖ a :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
#align of_dual_covby_of_dual_iff ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, CovBy.toDual⟩ := toDual_covBy_toDual_iff
#align covby.to_dual CovBy.toDual
alias ⟨_, CovBy.ofDual⟩ := ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff
#align covby.of_dual CovBy.ofDual
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
theorem CovBy.le (h : a ⋖ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1.le
#align covby.le CovBy.le
protected theorem CovBy.ne (h : a ⋖ b) : a ≠ b :=
h.lt.ne
#align covby.ne CovBy.ne
theorem CovBy.ne' (h : a ⋖ b) : b ≠ a :=
h.lt.ne'
#align covby.ne' CovBy.ne'
protected theorem CovBy.wcovBy (h : a ⋖ b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h.le, h.2⟩
#align covby.wcovby CovBy.wcovBy
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_not_le (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : ¬b ≤ a) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h.le.lt_of_not_le h2, h.2⟩
#align wcovby.covby_of_not_le WCovBy.covBy_of_not_le
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_lt (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a < b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h2, h.2⟩
#align wcovby.covby_of_lt WCovBy.covBy_of_lt
lemma CovBy.of_le_of_lt (hac : a ⋖ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b < c) : b ⋖ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma CovBy.of_lt_of_le (hac : a ⋖ c) (hab : a < b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem not_covBy_of_lt_of_lt (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : b < c) : ¬a ⋖ c :=
(not_covBy_iff (h₁.trans h₂)).2 ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
#align not_covby_of_lt_of_lt not_covBy_of_lt_of_lt
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ a < b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.lt⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_lt h.2⟩
#align covby_iff_wcovby_and_lt covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.lt.not_le⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_not_le h.2⟩
#align covby_iff_wcovby_and_not_le covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le
theorem wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le : a ⩿ b ↔ a ⋖ b ∨ a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun h' => h.covBy_of_not_le fun hba => h' ⟨h.le, hba⟩,
fun h' => h'.elim (fun h => h.wcovBy) fun h => h.1.wcovBy_of_le h.2⟩
#align wcovby_iff_covby_or_le_and_le wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_covBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⋖ c) : a ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans_lt hbc.lt, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
#align antisymm_rel.trans_covby AntisymmRel.trans_covBy
theorem covBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⋖ c ↔ b ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_covBy, hab.trans_covBy⟩
#align covby_congr_left covBy_congr_left
theorem CovBy.trans_antisymmRel (hab : a ⋖ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.lt.trans_le hbc.1, fun _ had hdb => hab.2 had <| hdb.trans_le hbc.2⟩
#align covby.trans_antisymm_rel CovBy.trans_antisymmRel
theorem covBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⋖ a ↔ c ⋖ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymmRel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymmRel hab.symm⟩
#align covby_congr_right covBy_congr_right
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder α (· ⩿ ·) (· ⋖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ =>
covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le.trans <| and_congr_right fun h => h.wcovBy_iff_le.not.symm⟩
instance CovBy.isIrrefl : IsIrrefl α (· ⋖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ ha => ha.ne rfl⟩
#align covby.is_irrefl CovBy.isIrrefl
theorem CovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
h.wcovBy.Ioo_eq
#align covby.Ioo_eq CovBy.Ioo_eq
theorem covBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⋖ b ↔ a < b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align covby_iff_Ioo_eq covBy_iff_Ioo_eq
theorem CovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⋖ f b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨f.lt_iff_lt.mp h.lt, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
#align covby.of_image CovBy.of_image
theorem CovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⋖ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⋖ f b :=
(hab.wcovBy.image f h).covBy_of_lt <| f.strictMono hab.lt
#align covby.image CovBy.image
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⋖ f b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨CovBy.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
#align set.ord_connected.apply_covby_apply_iff Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff
@[simp]
theorem apply_covBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
e a ⋖ e b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_covBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
#align apply_covby_apply_iff apply_covBy_apply_iff
theorem covBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a < b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
#align covby_of_eq_or_eq covBy_of_eq_or_eq
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_ne (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a ≠ b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h.le.lt_of_ne h2, h.2⟩
#align wcovby.covby_of_ne WCovBy.covBy_of_ne
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_ne : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.ne⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_ne h.2⟩
#align covby_iff_wcovby_and_ne covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_ne
theorem wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ⋖ b ∨ a = b := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le]
#align wcovby_iff_covby_or_eq wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq
theorem wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy : a ⩿ b ↔ a = b ∨ a ⋖ b :=
wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq.trans or_comm
#align wcovby_iff_eq_or_covby wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy
alias ⟨WCovBy.covBy_or_eq, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq
#align wcovby.covby_or_eq WCovBy.covBy_or_eq
alias ⟨WCovBy.eq_or_covBy, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy
#align wcovby.eq_or_covby WCovBy.eq_or_covBy
theorem CovBy.eq_or_eq (h : a ⋖ b) (h2 : a ≤ c) (h3 : c ≤ b) : c = a ∨ c = b :=
h.wcovBy.eq_or_eq h2 h3
#align covby.eq_or_eq CovBy.eq_or_eq
/-- An `iff` version of `CovBy.eq_or_eq` and `covBy_of_eq_or_eq`. -/
theorem covBy_iff_lt_and_eq_or_eq : a ⋖ b ↔ a < b ∧ ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.lt, fun _ => h.eq_or_eq⟩, And.rec covBy_of_eq_or_eq⟩
#align covby_iff_lt_and_eq_or_eq covBy_iff_lt_and_eq_or_eq
theorem CovBy.Ico_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ico a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_left h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
#align covby.Ico_eq CovBy.Ico_eq
theorem CovBy.Ioc_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioc a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_right h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
#align covby.Ioc_eq CovBy.Ioc_eq
theorem CovBy.Icc_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Icc a b = {a, b} :=
h.wcovBy.Icc_eq
#align covby.Icc_eq CovBy.Icc_eq
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem CovBy.Ioi_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioi a = Ici b := by
rw [← Ioo_union_Ici_eq_Ioi h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
#align covby.Ioi_eq CovBy.Ioi_eq
theorem CovBy.Iio_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Iio b = Iic a := by
rw [← Iic_union_Ioo_eq_Iio h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, union_empty]
#align covby.Iio_eq CovBy.Iio_eq
theorem WCovBy.le_of_lt (hab : a ⩿ b) (hcb : c < b) : c ≤ a :=
not_lt.1 fun hac => hab.2 hac hcb
#align wcovby.le_of_lt WCovBy.le_of_lt
theorem WCovBy.ge_of_gt (hab : a ⩿ b) (hac : a < c) : b ≤ c :=
not_lt.1 <| hab.2 hac
#align wcovby.ge_of_gt WCovBy.ge_of_gt
theorem CovBy.le_of_lt (hab : a ⋖ b) : c < b → c ≤ a :=
hab.wcovBy.le_of_lt
#align covby.le_of_lt CovBy.le_of_lt
theorem CovBy.ge_of_gt (hab : a ⋖ b) : a < c → b ≤ c :=
hab.wcovBy.ge_of_gt
#align covby.ge_of_gt CovBy.ge_of_gt
theorem CovBy.unique_left (ha : a ⋖ c) (hb : b ⋖ c) : a = b :=
(hb.le_of_lt ha.lt).antisymm <| ha.le_of_lt hb.lt
#align covby.unique_left CovBy.unique_left
theorem CovBy.unique_right (hb : a ⋖ b) (hc : a ⋖ c) : b = c :=
(hb.ge_of_gt hc.lt).antisymm <| hc.ge_of_gt hb.lt
#align covby.unique_right CovBy.unique_right
/-- If `a`, `b`, `c` are consecutive and `a < x < c` then `x = b`. -/
theorem CovBy.eq_of_between {x : α} (hab : a ⋖ b) (hbc : b ⋖ c) (hax : a < x) (hxc : x < c) :
x = b :=
le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt fun h => hbc.2 h hxc) (le_of_not_lt <| hab.2 hax)
#align covby.eq_of_between CovBy.eq_of_between
/-- If `a < b` then there exist `a' > a` and `b' < b` such that `Set.Iio a'` is strictly to the left
of `Set.Ioi b'`. -/
lemma LT.lt.exists_disjoint_Iio_Ioi (h : a < b) :
∃ a' > a, ∃ b' < b, ∀ x < a', ∀ y > b', x < y := by
by_cases h' : a ⋖ b
· exact ⟨b, h, a, h, fun x hx y hy => hx.trans_le <| h'.ge_of_gt hy⟩
· rcases h.exists_lt_lt h' with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, ha, c, hb, fun _ h₁ _ => lt_trans h₁⟩
end LinearOrder
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma wcovBy_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⩿ insert x s := by
refine wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (subset_insert x s) fun t hst h2t => ?_
by_cases h : x ∈ t
· exact Or.inr (subset_antisymm h2t <| insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨h, hst⟩)
· refine Or.inl (subset_antisymm ?_ hst)
rwa [← diff_singleton_eq_self h, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
#align set.wcovby_insert Set.wcovBy_insert
@[simp] lemma sdiff_singleton_wcovBy (s : Set α) (a : α) : s \ {a} ⩿ s := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· convert wcovBy_insert a _
ext
simp [ha]
· simp [ha]
@[simp] lemma covBy_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⋖ insert a s :=
(wcovBy_insert _ _).covBy_of_lt <| ssubset_insert ha
#align set.covby_insert Set.covBy_insert
@[simp] lemma sdiff_singleton_covBy (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ {a} ⋖ s :=
⟨sdiff_lt (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) <| singleton_ne_empty _, (sdiff_singleton_wcovBy _ _).2⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_set_insert (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_insert.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssuperset <| h.2 <| ssubset_insert ha).symm⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_set_sdiff_singleton (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∈ t, t \ {a} = s :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_sdiff_singleton.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssubset fun h' ↦ h.2 h' <|
sdiff_lt (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) <| singleton_ne_empty _).symm⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_insert : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t :=
⟨CovBy.exists_set_insert, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact covBy_insert ha⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_sdiff_singleton : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, t \ {a} = s :=
⟨CovBy.exists_set_sdiff_singleton, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact sdiff_singleton_covBy ha⟩
end Set
section Relation
open Relation
lemma wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] : ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
ext x y; simp_rw [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, @eq_comm _ x, reflGen_iff]
lemma transGen_wcovBy_eq_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] :
TransGen ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
rw [wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, transGen_reflGen]
lemma reflTransGen_wcovBy_eq_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] :
ReflTransGen ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
rw [wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, reflTransGen_reflGen]
end Relation
namespace Prod
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β} {x y : α × β}
@[simp]
theorem swap_wcovBy_swap : x.swap ⩿ y.swap ↔ x ⩿ y :=
apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (OrderIso.prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α)
#align prod.swap_wcovby_swap Prod.swap_wcovBy_swap
@[simp]
theorem swap_covBy_swap : x.swap ⋖ y.swap ↔ x ⋖ y :=
apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderIso.prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α)
#align prod.swap_covby_swap Prod.swap_covBy_swap
theorem fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy : x ⩿ y → x.1 = y.1 ∨ x.2 = y.2 := by
refine fun h => of_not_not fun hab => ?_
push_neg at hab
exact
h.2 (mk_lt_mk.2 <| Or.inl ⟨hab.1.lt_of_le h.1.1, le_rfl⟩)
(mk_lt_mk.2 <| Or.inr ⟨le_rfl, hab.2.lt_of_le h.1.2⟩)
#align prod.fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovby Prod.fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy
theorem _root_.WCovBy.fst (h : x ⩿ y) : x.1 ⩿ y.1 :=
⟨h.1.1, fun _ h₁ h₂ => h.2 (mk_lt_mk_iff_left.2 h₁) ⟨⟨h₂.le, h.1.2⟩, fun hc => h₂.not_le hc.1⟩⟩
#align wcovby.fst WCovBy.fst
theorem _root_.WCovBy.snd (h : x ⩿ y) : x.2 ⩿ y.2 :=
⟨h.1.2, fun _ h₁ h₂ => h.2 (mk_lt_mk_iff_right.2 h₁) ⟨⟨h.1.1, h₂.le⟩, fun hc => h₂.not_le hc.2⟩⟩
#align wcovby.snd WCovBy.snd
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ⩿ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ⩿ a₂ := by
refine ⟨WCovBy.fst, (And.imp mk_le_mk_iff_left.2) fun h c h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
have : c.2 = b := h₂.le.2.antisymm h₁.le.2
rw [← @Prod.mk.eta _ _ c, this, mk_lt_mk_iff_left] at h₁ h₂
exact h h₁ h₂
#align prod.mk_wcovby_mk_iff_left Prod.mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) ⩿ (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ ⩿ b₂ :=
swap_wcovBy_swap.trans mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left
#align prod.mk_wcovby_mk_iff_right Prod.mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right
theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ⋖ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ⋖ a₂ := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt, mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left, mk_lt_mk_iff_left]
#align prod.mk_covby_mk_iff_left Prod.mk_covBy_mk_iff_left
theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) ⋖ (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ ⋖ b₂ := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt, mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right, mk_lt_mk_iff_right]
#align prod.mk_covby_mk_iff_right Prod.mk_covBy_mk_iff_right
| Mathlib/Order/Cover.lean | 592 | 599 | theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff : (a₁, b₁) ⩿ (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ ⩿ a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ ⩿ b₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl | rfl : a₁ = a₂ ∨ b₁ = b₂ := fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy h
· exact Or.inr ⟨mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right.1 h, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left.1 h, rfl⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨h, rfl⟩)
· exact mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left.2 h
· exact mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right.2 h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Mates
#align_import category_theory.closed.monoidal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0caf3701139ef2e69c215717665361cda205a90b"
/-!
# Closed monoidal categories
Define (right) closed objects and (right) closed monoidal categories.
## TODO
Some of the theorems proved about cartesian closed categories
should be generalised and moved to this file.
-/
universe v u u₂ v₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category MonoidalCategory
-- Note that this class carries a particular choice of right adjoint,
-- (which is only unique up to isomorphism),
-- not merely the existence of such, and
-- so definitional properties of instances may be important.
/-- An object `X` is (right) closed if `(X ⊗ -)` is a left adjoint. -/
class Closed {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] (X : C) where
/-- a choice of a right adjoint for `tensorLeft X` -/
rightAdj : C ⥤ C
/-- `tensorLeft X` is a left adjoint -/
adj : tensorLeft X ⊣ rightAdj
#align category_theory.closed CategoryTheory.Closed
/-- A monoidal category `C` is (right) monoidal closed if every object is (right) closed. -/
class MonoidalClosed (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] where
closed (X : C) : Closed X := by infer_instance
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed
attribute [instance 100] MonoidalClosed.closed
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C]
/-- If `X` and `Y` are closed then `X ⊗ Y` is.
This isn't an instance because it's not usually how we want to construct internal homs,
we'll usually prove all objects are closed uniformly.
-/
def tensorClosed {X Y : C} (hX : Closed X) (hY : Closed Y) : Closed (X ⊗ Y) where
adj := (hY.adj.comp hX.adj).ofNatIsoLeft (MonoidalCategory.tensorLeftTensor X Y).symm
#align category_theory.tensor_closed CategoryTheory.tensorClosed
/-- The unit object is always closed.
This isn't an instance because most of the time we'll prove closedness for all objects at once,
rather than just for this one.
-/
def unitClosed : Closed (𝟙_ C) where
rightAdj := 𝟭 C
adj := Adjunction.id.ofNatIsoLeft (MonoidalCategory.leftUnitorNatIso C).symm
#align category_theory.unit_closed CategoryTheory.unitClosed
variable (A B : C) {X X' Y Y' Z : C}
variable [Closed A]
/-- This is the internal hom `A ⟶[C] -`.
-/
def ihom : C ⥤ C :=
Closed.rightAdj (X := A)
#align category_theory.ihom CategoryTheory.ihom
namespace ihom
/-- The adjunction between `A ⊗ -` and `A ⟹ -`. -/
def adjunction : tensorLeft A ⊣ ihom A :=
Closed.adj
#align category_theory.ihom.adjunction CategoryTheory.ihom.adjunction
/-- The evaluation natural transformation. -/
def ev : ihom A ⋙ tensorLeft A ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
(ihom.adjunction A).counit
#align category_theory.ihom.ev CategoryTheory.ihom.ev
/-- The coevaluation natural transformation. -/
def coev : 𝟭 C ⟶ tensorLeft A ⋙ ihom A :=
(ihom.adjunction A).unit
#align category_theory.ihom.coev CategoryTheory.ihom.coev
@[simp]
theorem ihom_adjunction_counit : (ihom.adjunction A).counit = ev A :=
rfl
#align category_theory.ihom.ihom_adjunction_counit CategoryTheory.ihom.ihom_adjunction_counit
@[simp]
theorem ihom_adjunction_unit : (ihom.adjunction A).unit = coev A :=
rfl
#align category_theory.ihom.ihom_adjunction_unit CategoryTheory.ihom.ihom_adjunction_unit
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ev_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
A ◁ (ihom A).map f ≫ (ev A).app Y = (ev A).app X ≫ f :=
(ev A).naturality f
#align category_theory.ihom.ev_naturality CategoryTheory.ihom.ev_naturality
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coev_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ (coev A).app Y = (coev A).app X ≫ (ihom A).map (A ◁ f) :=
(coev A).naturality f
#align category_theory.ihom.coev_naturality CategoryTheory.ihom.coev_naturality
set_option quotPrecheck false in
/-- `A ⟶[C] B` denotes the internal hom from `A` to `B` -/
notation A " ⟶[" C "] " B:10 => (@ihom C _ _ A _).obj B
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ev_coev : (A ◁ (coev A).app B) ≫ (ev A).app (A ⊗ B) = 𝟙 (A ⊗ B) :=
(ihom.adjunction A).left_triangle_components _
#align category_theory.ihom.ev_coev CategoryTheory.ihom.ev_coev
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coev_ev : (coev A).app (A ⟶[C] B) ≫ (ihom A).map ((ev A).app B) = 𝟙 (A ⟶[C] B) :=
Adjunction.right_triangle_components (ihom.adjunction A) _
#align category_theory.ihom.coev_ev CategoryTheory.ihom.coev_ev
end ihom
open CategoryTheory.Limits
instance : PreservesColimits (tensorLeft A) :=
(ihom.adjunction A).leftAdjointPreservesColimits
variable {A}
-- Wrap these in a namespace so we don't clash with the core versions.
namespace MonoidalClosed
/-- Currying in a monoidal closed category. -/
def curry : (A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) → (Y ⟶ A ⟶[C] X) :=
(ihom.adjunction A).homEquiv _ _
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.curry CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.curry
/-- Uncurrying in a monoidal closed category. -/
def uncurry : (Y ⟶ A ⟶[C] X) → (A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) :=
((ihom.adjunction A).homEquiv _ _).symm
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.uncurry CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.uncurry
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem homEquiv_apply_eq (f : A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) : (ihom.adjunction A).homEquiv _ _ f = curry f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.hom_equiv_apply_eq CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.homEquiv_apply_eq
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem homEquiv_symm_apply_eq (f : Y ⟶ A ⟶[C] X) :
((ihom.adjunction A).homEquiv _ _).symm f = uncurry f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.hom_equiv_symm_apply_eq CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.homEquiv_symm_apply_eq
@[reassoc]
theorem curry_natural_left (f : X ⟶ X') (g : A ⊗ X' ⟶ Y) : curry (_ ◁ f ≫ g) = f ≫ curry g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_left _ _ _
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.curry_natural_left CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.curry_natural_left
@[reassoc]
theorem curry_natural_right (f : A ⊗ X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
curry (f ≫ g) = curry f ≫ (ihom _).map g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_right _ _ _
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.curry_natural_right CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.curry_natural_right
@[reassoc]
theorem uncurry_natural_right (f : X ⟶ A ⟶[C] Y) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
uncurry (f ≫ (ihom _).map g) = uncurry f ≫ g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_right_symm _ _ _
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.uncurry_natural_right CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.uncurry_natural_right
@[reassoc]
theorem uncurry_natural_left (f : X ⟶ X') (g : X' ⟶ A ⟶[C] Y) :
uncurry (f ≫ g) = _ ◁ f ≫ uncurry g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_left_symm _ _ _
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.uncurry_natural_left CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.uncurry_natural_left
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_curry (f : A ⊗ X ⟶ Y) : uncurry (curry f) = f :=
(Closed.adj.homEquiv _ _).left_inv f
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.uncurry_curry CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.uncurry_curry
@[simp]
theorem curry_uncurry (f : X ⟶ A ⟶[C] Y) : curry (uncurry f) = f :=
(Closed.adj.homEquiv _ _).right_inv f
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.curry_uncurry CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.curry_uncurry
theorem curry_eq_iff (f : A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ A ⟶[C] X) : curry f = g ↔ f = uncurry g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_apply_eq (ihom.adjunction A) f g
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.curry_eq_iff CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.curry_eq_iff
theorem eq_curry_iff (f : A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ A ⟶[C] X) : g = curry f ↔ uncurry g = f :=
Adjunction.eq_homEquiv_apply (ihom.adjunction A) f g
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.eq_curry_iff CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.eq_curry_iff
-- I don't think these two should be simp.
theorem uncurry_eq (g : Y ⟶ A ⟶[C] X) : uncurry g = (A ◁ g) ≫ (ihom.ev A).app X :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_counit _
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.uncurry_eq CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.uncurry_eq
theorem curry_eq (g : A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) : curry g = (ihom.coev A).app Y ≫ (ihom A).map g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_unit _
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.curry_eq CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.curry_eq
theorem curry_injective : Function.Injective (curry : (A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) → (Y ⟶ A ⟶[C] X)) :=
(Closed.adj.homEquiv _ _).injective
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.curry_injective CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.curry_injective
theorem uncurry_injective : Function.Injective (uncurry : (Y ⟶ A ⟶[C] X) → (A ⊗ Y ⟶ X)) :=
(Closed.adj.homEquiv _ _).symm.injective
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.uncurry_injective CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.uncurry_injective
variable (A X)
theorem uncurry_id_eq_ev : uncurry (𝟙 (A ⟶[C] X)) = (ihom.ev A).app X := by
simp [uncurry_eq]
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.uncurry_id_eq_ev CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.uncurry_id_eq_ev
theorem curry_id_eq_coev : curry (𝟙 _) = (ihom.coev A).app X := by
rw [curry_eq, (ihom A).map_id (A ⊗ _)]
apply comp_id
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.curry_id_eq_coev CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.curry_id_eq_coev
section Pre
variable {A B} [Closed B]
/-- Pre-compose an internal hom with an external hom. -/
def pre (f : B ⟶ A) : ihom A ⟶ ihom B :=
transferNatTransSelf (ihom.adjunction _) (ihom.adjunction _) ((tensoringLeft C).map f)
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.pre CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.pre
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem id_tensor_pre_app_comp_ev (f : B ⟶ A) (X : C) :
B ◁ (pre f).app X ≫ (ihom.ev B).app X = f ▷ (A ⟶[C] X) ≫ (ihom.ev A).app X :=
transferNatTransSelf_counit _ _ ((tensoringLeft C).map f) X
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.id_tensor_pre_app_comp_ev CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.id_tensor_pre_app_comp_ev
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_pre (f : B ⟶ A) (X : C) :
MonoidalClosed.uncurry ((pre f).app X) = f ▷ _ ≫ (ihom.ev A).app X := by
simp [uncurry_eq]
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.uncurry_pre CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.uncurry_pre
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coev_app_comp_pre_app (f : B ⟶ A) :
(ihom.coev A).app X ≫ (pre f).app (A ⊗ X) = (ihom.coev B).app X ≫ (ihom B).map (f ▷ _) :=
unit_transferNatTransSelf _ _ ((tensoringLeft C).map f) X
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.coev_app_comp_pre_app CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.coev_app_comp_pre_app
@[simp]
theorem pre_id (A : C) [Closed A] : pre (𝟙 A) = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [pre, Functor.map_id]
apply transferNatTransSelf_id
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.pre_id CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.pre_id
@[simp]
theorem pre_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ : C} [Closed A₁] [Closed A₂] [Closed A₃] (f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : A₂ ⟶ A₃) :
pre (f ≫ g) = pre g ≫ pre f := by
rw [pre, pre, pre, transferNatTransSelf_comp, (tensoringLeft C).map_comp]
#align category_theory.monoidal_closed.pre_map CategoryTheory.MonoidalClosed.pre_map
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Closed/Monoidal.lean | 272 | 273 | theorem pre_comm_ihom_map {W X Y Z : C} [Closed W] [Closed X] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pre f).app Y ≫ (ihom W).map g = (ihom X).map g ≫ (pre f).app Z := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
#align_import algebra.cubic_discriminant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"930133160e24036d5242039fe4972407cd4f1222"
/-!
# Cubics and discriminants
This file defines cubic polynomials over a semiring and their discriminants over a splitting field.
## Main definitions
* `Cubic`: the structure representing a cubic polynomial.
* `Cubic.disc`: the discriminant of a cubic polynomial.
## Main statements
* `Cubic.disc_ne_zero_iff_roots_nodup`: the cubic discriminant is not equal to zero if and only if
the cubic has no duplicate roots.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_equation
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant
## Tags
cubic, discriminant, polynomial, root
-/
noncomputable section
/-- The structure representing a cubic polynomial. -/
@[ext]
structure Cubic (R : Type*) where
(a b c d : R)
#align cubic Cubic
namespace Cubic
open Cubic Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable {R S F K : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default, default⟩⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
section Basic
variable {P Q : Cubic R} {a b c d a' b' c' d' : R} [Semiring R]
/-- Convert a cubic polynomial to a polynomial. -/
def toPoly (P : Cubic R) : R[X] :=
C P.a * X ^ 3 + C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d
#align cubic.to_poly Cubic.toPoly
theorem C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {w x y z : S} :
C w * (X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨w, w * -(x + y + z), w * (x * y + x * z + y * z), w * -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
simp only [toPoly, C_neg, C_add, C_mul]
ring1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cubic.C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq Cubic.C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq
theorem prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {x y z : S} :
(X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨1, -(x + y + z), x * y + x * z + y * z, -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
rw [← one_mul <| X - C x, ← C_1, C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq, one_mul, one_mul, one_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq Cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq
/-! ### Coefficients -/
section Coeff
private theorem coeffs : (∀ n > 3, P.toPoly.coeff n = 0) ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a ∧
P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d := by
simp only [toPoly, coeff_add, coeff_C, coeff_C_mul_X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
intro n hn
repeat' rw [if_neg]
any_goals linarith only [hn]
repeat' rw [zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 3 < n) : P.toPoly.coeff n = 0 :=
coeffs.1 n hn
#align cubic.coeff_eq_zero Cubic.coeff_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_a : P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a :=
coeffs.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_a Cubic.coeff_eq_a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_b : P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b :=
coeffs.2.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_b Cubic.coeff_eq_b
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_c : P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c :=
coeffs.2.2.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_c Cubic.coeff_eq_c
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_d : P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d :=
coeffs.2.2.2.2
#align cubic.coeff_eq_d Cubic.coeff_eq_d
theorem a_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.a = Q.a := by rw [← coeff_eq_a, h, coeff_eq_a]
#align cubic.a_of_eq Cubic.a_of_eq
theorem b_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.b = Q.b := by rw [← coeff_eq_b, h, coeff_eq_b]
#align cubic.b_of_eq Cubic.b_of_eq
theorem c_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.c = Q.c := by rw [← coeff_eq_c, h, coeff_eq_c]
#align cubic.c_of_eq Cubic.c_of_eq
theorem d_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.d = Q.d := by rw [← coeff_eq_d, h, coeff_eq_d]
#align cubic.d_of_eq Cubic.d_of_eq
theorem toPoly_injective (P Q : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly ↔ P = Q :=
⟨fun h ↦ Cubic.ext P Q (a_of_eq h) (b_of_eq h) (c_of_eq h) (d_of_eq h), congr_arg toPoly⟩
#align cubic.to_poly_injective Cubic.toPoly_injective
theorem of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [toPoly, ha, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_a_eq_zero Cubic.of_a_eq_zero
theorem of_a_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩ = C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d :=
of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.of_a_eq_zero'
theorem of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, hb, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_b_eq_zero Cubic.of_b_eq_zero
theorem of_b_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩ = C c * X + C d :=
of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_b_eq_zero' Cubic.of_b_eq_zero'
theorem of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.d := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, hc, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_c_eq_zero Cubic.of_c_eq_zero
theorem of_c_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩ = C d :=
of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.of_c_eq_zero'
theorem of_d_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 0) :
P.toPoly = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, hd, C_0]
#align cubic.of_d_eq_zero Cubic.of_d_eq_zero
theorem of_d_eq_zero' : (⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩ : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_d_eq_zero' Cubic.of_d_eq_zero'
theorem zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero'
#align cubic.zero Cubic.zero
theorem toPoly_eq_zero_iff (P : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = 0 ↔ P = 0 := by
rw [← zero, toPoly_injective]
#align cubic.to_poly_eq_zero_iff Cubic.toPoly_eq_zero_iff
private theorem ne_zero (h0 : P.a ≠ 0 ∨ P.b ≠ 0 ∨ P.c ≠ 0 ∨ P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h0
rw [(toPoly_eq_zero_iff P).mp h0]
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp ne_zero).1 ha
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).1 hb
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero (hc : P.c ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).2).1 hc
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero (hd : P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).2).2 hd
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.a :=
leadingCoeff_cubic ha
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = a :=
leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.b := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, leadingCoeff_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = b :=
leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.c := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, leadingCoeff_linear hc]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = c :=
leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) :
P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.d := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, leadingCoeff_C]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_eq_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero
-- @[simp] -- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).leadingCoeff = d :=
leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero'
theorem monic_of_a_eq_one (ha : P.a = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero (ha ▸ one_ne_zero), ha]
#align cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one
theorem monic_of_a_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨1, b, c, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_a_eq_one rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_b_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero ha (hb ▸ one_ne_zero), hb]
#align cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one
theorem monic_of_b_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 1, c, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_b_eq_one rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_c_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero ha hb (hc ▸ one_ne_zero), hc]
#align cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one
theorem monic_of_c_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 1, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_c_eq_one rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_d_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 1) :
P.toPoly.Monic := by
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, hd]
#align cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one
theorem monic_of_d_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, 1⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_d_eq_one rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one'
end Coeff
/-! ### Degrees -/
section Degree
/-- The equivalence between cubic polynomials and polynomials of degree at most three. -/
@[simps]
def equiv : Cubic R ≃ { p : R[X] // p.degree ≤ 3 } where
toFun P := ⟨P.toPoly, degree_cubic_le⟩
invFun f := ⟨coeff f 3, coeff f 2, coeff f 1, coeff f 0⟩
left_inv P := by ext <;> simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, coeffs]
right_inv f := by
-- Porting note: Added `simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] <;> ring_nf`
-- There's probably a better way to do this.
ext (_ | _ | _ | _ | n) <;> simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] <;> ring_nf
<;> try simp only [coeffs]
have h3 : 3 < 4 + n := by linarith only
rw [coeff_eq_zero h3,
(degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) 3).mp f.2 _ <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr (by exact h3)]
#align cubic.equiv Cubic.equiv
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 3 :=
degree_cubic ha
#align cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).degree = 3 :=
degree_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 2 := by
simpa only [of_a_eq_zero ha] using degree_quadratic_le
#align cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_a_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).degree ≤ 2 :=
degree_of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 2 := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, degree_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).degree = 2 :=
degree_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [of_b_eq_zero ha hb] using degree_linear_le
#align cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_b_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).degree ≤ 1 :=
degree_of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 1 := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, degree_linear hc]
#align cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).degree = 1 :=
degree_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
#align cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc] using degree_C_le
#align cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).degree ≤ 0 :=
degree_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.degree = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, degree_C hd]
#align cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_ne_zero' (hd : d ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).degree = 0 :=
degree_of_d_ne_zero rfl rfl rfl hd
#align cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 0) :
P.toPoly.degree = ⊥ := by
rw [of_d_eq_zero ha hb hc hd, degree_zero]
#align cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero
-- @[simp] -- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem degree_of_d_eq_zero' : (⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩ : Cubic R).toPoly.degree = ⊥ :=
degree_of_d_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly.degree = ⊥ :=
degree_of_d_eq_zero'
#align cubic.degree_of_zero Cubic.degree_of_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree = 3 :=
natDegree_cubic ha
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).natDegree = 3 :=
natDegree_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_a_ne_zero'
theorem natDegree_of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree ≤ 2 := by
simpa only [of_a_eq_zero ha] using natDegree_quadratic_le
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_eq_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_a_eq_zero
theorem natDegree_of_a_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).natDegree ≤ 2 :=
natDegree_of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_a_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree = 2 := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, natDegree_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).natDegree = 2 :=
natDegree_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero'
theorem natDegree_of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [of_b_eq_zero ha hb] using natDegree_linear_le
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_eq_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_b_eq_zero
theorem natDegree_of_b_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_eq_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_b_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.natDegree = 1 := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, natDegree_linear hc]
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_c_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_c_ne_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_c_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) :
P.toPoly.natDegree = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, natDegree_C]
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_c_eq_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_c_eq_zero
-- @[simp] -- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem natDegree_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).natDegree = 0 :=
natDegree_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_c_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly.natDegree = 0 :=
natDegree_of_c_eq_zero'
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_zero
end Degree
/-! ### Map across a homomorphism -/
section Map
variable [Semiring S] {φ : R →+* S}
/-- Map a cubic polynomial across a semiring homomorphism. -/
def map (φ : R →+* S) (P : Cubic R) : Cubic S :=
⟨φ P.a, φ P.b, φ P.c, φ P.d⟩
#align cubic.map Cubic.map
theorem map_toPoly : (map φ P).toPoly = Polynomial.map φ P.toPoly := by
simp only [map, toPoly, map_C, map_X, Polynomial.map_add, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_pow]
#align cubic.map_to_poly Cubic.map_toPoly
end Map
end Basic
section Roots
open Multiset
/-! ### Roots over an extension -/
section Extension
variable {P : Cubic R} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {φ : R →+* S}
/-- The roots of a cubic polynomial. -/
def roots [IsDomain R] (P : Cubic R) : Multiset R :=
P.toPoly.roots
#align cubic.roots Cubic.roots
theorem map_roots [IsDomain S] : (map φ P).roots = (Polynomial.map φ P.toPoly).roots := by
rw [roots, map_toPoly]
#align cubic.map_roots Cubic.map_roots
| Mathlib/Algebra/CubicDiscriminant.lean | 486 | 489 | theorem mem_roots_iff [IsDomain R] (h0 : P.toPoly ≠ 0) (x : R) :
x ∈ P.roots ↔ P.a * x ^ 3 + P.b * x ^ 2 + P.c * x + P.d = 0 := by |
rw [roots, mem_roots h0, IsRoot, toPoly]
simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_add, eval_mul, eval_pow]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.PoissonSummation
/-!
# Poisson summation applied to the Gaussian
In `Real.tsum_exp_neg_mul_int_sq` and `Complex.tsum_exp_neg_mul_int_sq`, we use Poisson summation
to prove the identity
`∑' (n : ℤ), exp (-π * a * n ^ 2) = 1 / a ^ (1 / 2) * ∑' (n : ℤ), exp (-π / a * n ^ 2)`
for positive real `a`, or complex `a` with positive real part. (See also
`NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta`.)
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics intervalIntegral
open scoped Real Topology FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp abs_of_nonneg sq_abs
noncomputable section
section GaussianPoisson
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-! First we show that Gaussian-type functions have rapid decay along `cocompact ℝ`. -/
lemma rexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop {a : ℝ} (ha : a < 0) (b s : ℝ) :
(fun x ↦ rexp (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) =o[atTop] (· ^ s) := by
suffices (fun x ↦ rexp (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) =o[atTop] (fun x ↦ rexp (-x)) by
refine this.trans ?_
simpa only [neg_one_mul] using isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop zero_lt_one s
rw [isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
have : (fun x ↦ -x - (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) = fun x ↦ x * (-a * x - (b + 1)) := by
ext1 x; ring_nf
rw [this]
exact tendsto_id.atTop_mul_atTop <|
Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ <| tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop (neg_pos.mpr ha)
lemma cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop {a : ℂ} (ha : a.re < 0) (b : ℂ) (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ ↦ cexp (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) =o[atTop] (· ^ s) := by
apply Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_left
convert rexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop ha b.re s with x
simp_rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.abs_exp, add_re, ← ofReal_pow, mul_comm (_ : ℂ) ↑(_ : ℝ),
re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm _ (re _)]
lemma cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_abs_rpow_cocompact {a : ℂ} (ha : a.re < 0) (b : ℂ) (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ ↦ cexp (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) =o[cocompact ℝ] (|·| ^ s) := by
rw [cocompact_eq_atBot_atTop, isLittleO_sup]
constructor
· refine ((cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop ha (-b) s).comp_tendsto
Filter.tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop).congr' (eventually_of_forall fun x ↦ ?_) ?_
· simp only [neg_mul, Function.comp_apply, ofReal_neg, neg_sq, mul_neg, neg_neg]
· refine (eventually_lt_atBot 0).mp (eventually_of_forall fun x hx ↦ ?_)
simp only [Function.comp_apply, abs_of_neg hx]
· refine (cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop ha b s).congr' EventuallyEq.rfl ?_
refine (eventually_gt_atTop 0).mp (eventually_of_forall fun x hx ↦ ?_)
simp_rw [abs_of_pos hx]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/PoissonSummation.lean | 68 | 76 | theorem tendsto_rpow_abs_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_cocompact {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (s : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ s * rexp (-a * x ^ 2)) (cocompact ℝ) (𝓝 0) := by |
conv in rexp _ => rw [← sq_abs]
erw [cocompact_eq_atBot_atTop, ← comap_abs_atTop,
@tendsto_comap'_iff _ _ _ (fun y => y ^ s * rexp (-a * y ^ 2)) _ _ _
(mem_atTop_sets.mpr ⟨0, fun b hb => ⟨b, abs_of_nonneg hb⟩⟩)]
exact
(rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg ha s).tendsto_zero_of_tendsto
(tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop_of_neg (neg_lt_zero.mpr one_half_pos))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.CompleteSeparated
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Bounded
#align_import topology.metric_space.antilipschitz from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8f305514e0d47dfaa710f5a52f0d21b588e6328"
/-!
# Antilipschitz functions
We say that a map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is
`AntilipschitzWith K`, `K ≥ 0`, if for all `x, y` we have `edist x y ≤ K * edist (f x) (f y)`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist x y ≤ K * dist (f x) (f y)`.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjunction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. We do not require `0 < K` in the definition, mostly because
we do not have a `posreal` type.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Uniformity Topology
open Set Filter Bornology
/-- We say that `f : α → β` is `AntilipschitzWith K` if for any two points `x`, `y` we have
`edist x y ≤ K * edist (f x) (f y)`. -/
def AntilipschitzWith [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) :=
∀ x y, edist x y ≤ K * edist (f x) (f y)
#align antilipschitz_with AntilipschitzWith
theorem AntilipschitzWith.edist_lt_top [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(h x y).trans_lt <| ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top (edist_ne_top _ _)
#align antilipschitz_with.edist_lt_top AntilipschitzWith.edist_lt_top
theorem AntilipschitzWith.edist_ne_top [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(h.edist_lt_top x y).ne
#align antilipschitz_with.edist_ne_top AntilipschitzWith.edist_ne_top
section Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
theorem antilipschitzWith_iff_le_mul_nndist :
AntilipschitzWith K f ↔ ∀ x y, nndist x y ≤ K * nndist (f x) (f y) := by
simp only [AntilipschitzWith, edist_nndist]
norm_cast
#align antilipschitz_with_iff_le_mul_nndist antilipschitzWith_iff_le_mul_nndist
alias ⟨AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nndist, AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_nndist⟩ :=
antilipschitzWith_iff_le_mul_nndist
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_nndist AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nndist
#align antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_nndist AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_nndist
theorem antilipschitzWith_iff_le_mul_dist :
AntilipschitzWith K f ↔ ∀ x y, dist x y ≤ K * dist (f x) (f y) := by
simp only [antilipschitzWith_iff_le_mul_nndist, dist_nndist]
norm_cast
#align antilipschitz_with_iff_le_mul_dist antilipschitzWith_iff_le_mul_dist
alias ⟨AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_dist, AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist⟩ :=
antilipschitzWith_iff_le_mul_dist
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_dist AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_dist
#align antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist
namespace AntilipschitzWith
theorem mul_le_nndist (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) :
K⁻¹ * nndist x y ≤ nndist (f x) (f y) := by
simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul] using NNReal.div_le_of_le_mul' (hf.le_mul_nndist x y)
#align antilipschitz_with.mul_le_nndist AntilipschitzWith.mul_le_nndist
theorem mul_le_dist (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) :
(K⁻¹ * dist x y : ℝ) ≤ dist (f x) (f y) := mod_cast hf.mul_le_nndist x y
#align antilipschitz_with.mul_le_dist AntilipschitzWith.mul_le_dist
end AntilipschitzWith
end Metric
namespace AntilipschitzWith
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
open EMetric
-- uses neither `f` nor `hf`
/-- Extract the constant from `hf : AntilipschitzWith K f`. This is useful, e.g.,
if `K` is given by a long formula, and we want to reuse this value. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
protected def k (_hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) : ℝ≥0 := K
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align antilipschitz_with.K AntilipschitzWith.k
protected theorem injective {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [EMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
{K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) : Function.Injective f := fun x y h => by
simpa only [h, edist_self, mul_zero, edist_le_zero] using hf x y
#align antilipschitz_with.injective AntilipschitzWith.injective
theorem mul_le_edist (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) :
(K : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * edist x y ≤ edist (f x) (f y) := by
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul' (hf x y)
#align antilipschitz_with.mul_le_edist AntilipschitzWith.mul_le_edist
theorem ediam_preimage_le (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (s : Set β) : diam (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ K * diam s :=
diam_le fun x hx y hy => (hf x y).trans <|
mul_le_mul_left' (edist_le_diam_of_mem (mem_preimage.1 hx) hy) K
#align antilipschitz_with.ediam_preimage_le AntilipschitzWith.ediam_preimage_le
theorem le_mul_ediam_image (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) : diam s ≤ K * diam (f '' s) :=
(diam_mono (subset_preimage_image _ _)).trans (hf.ediam_preimage_le (f '' s))
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_ediam_image AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_ediam_image
protected theorem id : AntilipschitzWith 1 (id : α → α) := fun x y => by
simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, id, le_refl]
#align antilipschitz_with.id AntilipschitzWith.id
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Antilipschitz.lean | 129 | 134 | theorem comp {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : β → γ} (hg : AntilipschitzWith Kg g) {Kf : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : AntilipschitzWith Kf f) : AntilipschitzWith (Kf * Kg) (g ∘ f) := fun x y =>
calc
edist x y ≤ Kf * edist (f x) (f y) := hf x y
_ ≤ Kf * (Kg * edist (g (f x)) (g (f y))) := ENNReal.mul_left_mono (hg _ _)
_ = _ := by | rw [ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_assoc]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.IndepAxioms
/-!
# Matroid Duality
For a matroid `M` on ground set `E`, the collection of complements of the bases of `M` is the
collection of bases of another matroid on `E` called the 'dual' of `M`.
The map from `M` to its dual is an involution, interacts nicely with minors,
and preserves many important matroid properties such as representability and connectivity.
This file defines the dual matroid `M✶` of `M`, and gives associated API. The definition
is in terms of its independent sets, using `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
We also define 'Co-independence' (independence in the dual) of a set as a predicate `M.Coindep X`.
This is an abbreviation for `M✶.Indep X`, but has its own name for the sake of dot notation.
## Main Definitions
* `M.Dual`, written `M✶`, is the matroid in which a set `B` is a base if and only if `B ⊆ M.E`
and `M.E \ B` is a base for `M`.
* `M.Coindep X` means `M✶.Indep X`, or equivalently that `X` is contained in `M.E \ B` for some
base `B` of `M`.
-/
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {I B X : Set α}
section dual
/-- Given `M : Matroid α`, the `IndepMatroid α` whose independent sets are
the subsets of `M.E` that are disjoint from some base of `M` -/
@[simps] def dualIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := M.E
Indep I := I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.Base B ∧ Disjoint I B
indep_empty := ⟨empty_subset M.E, M.exists_base.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, empty_disjoint _⟩)⟩
indep_subset := by
rintro I J ⟨hJE, B, hB, hJB⟩ hIJ
exact ⟨hIJ.trans hJE, ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left hIJ hJB⟩⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I X ⟨hIE, B, hB, hIB⟩ hI_not_max hX_max
have hXE := hX_max.1.1
have hB' := (base_compl_iff_mem_maximals_disjoint_base hXE).mpr hX_max
set B' := M.E \ X with hX
have hI := (not_iff_not.mpr (base_compl_iff_mem_maximals_disjoint_base)).mpr hI_not_max
obtain ⟨B'', hB'', hB''₁, hB''₂⟩ := (hB'.indep.diff I).exists_base_subset_union_base hB
rw [← compl_subset_compl, ← hIB.sdiff_eq_right, ← union_diff_distrib, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl, union_subset_iff, compl_subset_compl] at hB''₂
have hssu := (subset_inter (hB''₂.2) hIE).ssubset_of_ne
(by { rintro rfl; apply hI; convert hB''; simp [hB''.subset_ground] })
obtain ⟨e, ⟨(heB'' : e ∉ _), heE⟩, heI⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hssu
use e
simp_rw [mem_diff, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_left heI, and_iff_right heE, and_iff_right hIE]
refine ⟨by_contra (fun heX ↦ heB'' (hB''₁ ⟨?_, heI⟩)), ⟨B'', hB'', ?_⟩⟩
· rw [hX]; exact ⟨heE, heX⟩
rw [← union_singleton, disjoint_union_left, disjoint_singleton_left, and_iff_left heB'']
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hB''₂.2 disjoint_compl_left
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I'⟨hI'E, B, hB, hI'B⟩ hI'X
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_basis (M.E \ X)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB', hB'IB⟩ := hI.indep.exists_base_subset_union_base hB
refine ⟨(X \ B') ∩ M.E,
⟨?_, subset_inter (subset_diff.mpr ?_) hI'E, inter_subset_left.trans
diff_subset⟩, ?_⟩
· simp only [inter_subset_right, true_and]
exact ⟨B', hB', disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_left disjoint_sdiff_left⟩
· rw [and_iff_right hI'X]
refine disjoint_of_subset_right hB'IB ?_
rw [disjoint_union_right, and_iff_left hI'B]
exact disjoint_of_subset hI'X hI.subset disjoint_sdiff_right
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, subset_inter_iff, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
intros J hJE B'' hB'' hdj _ hJX hssJ
rw [and_iff_left hJE]
rw [diff_eq, inter_right_comm, ← diff_eq, diff_subset_iff] at hssJ
have hI' : (B'' ∩ X) ∪ (B' \ X) ⊆ B' := by
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left diff_subset,
← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hB''.subset_ground, inter_right_comm, inter_assoc]
calc _ ⊆ _ := inter_subset_inter_right _ hssJ
_ ⊆ _ := by rw [inter_union_distrib_left, hdj.symm.inter_eq, union_empty]
_ ⊆ _ := inter_subset_right
obtain ⟨B₁,hB₁,hI'B₁,hB₁I⟩ := (hB'.indep.subset hI').exists_base_subset_union_base hB''
rw [union_comm, ← union_assoc, union_eq_self_of_subset_right inter_subset_left] at hB₁I
have : B₁ = B' := by
refine hB₁.eq_of_subset_indep hB'.indep (fun e he ↦ ?_)
refine (hB₁I he).elim (fun heB'' ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ h.1)
refine (em (e ∈ X)).elim (fun heX ↦ hI' (Or.inl ⟨heB'', heX⟩)) (fun heX ↦ hIB' ?_)
refine hI.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨hB₁.subset_ground he, heX⟩
(hB₁.indep.subset (insert_subset he ?_))
refine (subset_union_of_subset_right (subset_diff.mpr ⟨hIB',?_⟩) _).trans hI'B₁
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hI.subset disjoint_sdiff_left
subst this
refine subset_diff.mpr ⟨hJX, by_contra (fun hne ↦ ?_)⟩
obtain ⟨e, heJ, heB'⟩ := not_disjoint_iff.mp hne
obtain (heB'' | ⟨-,heX⟩ ) := hB₁I heB'
· exact hdj.ne_of_mem heJ heB'' rfl
exact heX (hJX heJ)
subset_ground := by tauto
/-- The dual of a matroid; the bases are the complements (w.r.t `M.E`) of the bases of `M`. -/
def dual (M : Matroid α) : Matroid α := M.dualIndepMatroid.matroid
/-- The `✶` symbol, which denotes matroid duality.
(This is distinct from the usual `*` symbol for multiplication, due to precedence issues. )-/
postfix:max "✶" => Matroid.dual
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists' : (M✶.Indep I) ↔ I ⊆ M.E ∧ (∃ B, M.Base B ∧ Disjoint I B) := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_ground : M✶.E = M.E := rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_indep_iff_exists (hI : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.Indep I ↔ (∃ B, M.Base B ∧ Disjoint I B) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists', and_iff_right hI]
theorem dual_dep_iff_forall : (M✶.Dep I) ↔ (∀ B, M.Base B → (I ∩ B).Nonempty) ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
simp_rw [dep_iff, dual_indep_iff_exists', dual_ground, and_congr_left_iff, not_and,
not_exists, not_and, not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff,
iff_true_intro Or.inl]
instance dual_finite [M.Finite] : M✶.Finite :=
⟨M.ground_finite⟩
instance dual_nonempty [M.Nonempty] : M✶.Nonempty :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty⟩
@[simp] theorem dual_base_iff (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M✶.Base B ↔ M.Base (M.E \ B) := by
rw [base_compl_iff_mem_maximals_disjoint_base, base_iff_maximal_indep, dual_indep_iff_exists',
mem_maximals_setOf_iff]
simp [dual_indep_iff_exists']
theorem dual_base_iff' : M✶.Base B ↔ M.Base (M.E \ B) ∧ B ⊆ M.E :=
(em (B ⊆ M.E)).elim (fun h ↦ by rw [dual_base_iff, and_iff_left h])
(fun h ↦ iff_of_false (h ∘ (fun h' ↦ h'.subset_ground)) (h ∘ And.right))
theorem setOf_dual_base_eq : {B | M✶.Base B} = (fun X ↦ M.E \ X) '' {B | M.Base B} := by
ext B
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_image, dual_base_iff']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, h.1, diff_diff_cancel_left h.2⟩,
fun ⟨B', hB', h⟩ ↦ ⟨?_,h.symm.trans_subset diff_subset⟩⟩
rwa [← h, diff_diff_cancel_left hB'.subset_ground]
@[simp] theorem dual_dual (M : Matroid α) : M✶✶ = M :=
eq_of_base_iff_base_forall rfl (fun B (h : B ⊆ M.E) ↦
by rw [dual_base_iff, dual_base_iff, dual_ground, diff_diff_cancel_left h])
theorem dual_involutive : Function.Involutive (dual : Matroid α → Matroid α) := dual_dual
theorem dual_injective : Function.Injective (dual : Matroid α → Matroid α) :=
dual_involutive.injective
@[simp] theorem dual_inj {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁✶ = M₂✶ ↔ M₁ = M₂ :=
dual_injective.eq_iff
theorem eq_dual_comm {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁ = M₂✶ ↔ M₂ = M₁✶ := by
rw [← dual_inj, dual_dual, eq_comm]
theorem eq_dual_iff_dual_eq {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁ = M₂✶ ↔ M₁✶ = M₂ :=
dual_involutive.eq_iff.symm
theorem Base.compl_base_of_dual (h : M✶.Base B) : M.Base (M.E \ B) :=
(dual_base_iff'.1 h).1
theorem Base.compl_base_dual (h : M.Base B) : M✶.Base (M.E \ B) := by
rwa [dual_base_iff, diff_diff_cancel_left h.subset_ground]
theorem Base.compl_inter_basis_of_inter_basis (hB : M.Base B) (hBX : M.Basis (B ∩ X) X) :
M✶.Basis ((M.E \ B) ∩ (M.E \ X)) (M.E \ X) := by
refine Indep.basis_of_forall_insert ?_ inter_subset_right (fun e he ↦ ?_)
· rw [dual_indep_iff_exists]
exact ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_left disjoint_sdiff_left⟩
simp only [diff_inter_self_eq_diff, mem_diff, not_and, not_not, imp_iff_right he.1.1] at he
simp_rw [dual_dep_iff_forall, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_right he.1.1,
and_iff_left (inter_subset_left.trans diff_subset)]
refine fun B' hB' ↦ by_contra (fun hem ↦ ?_)
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, not_ne_iff, ← union_singleton, diff_inter_diff,
union_inter_distrib_right, union_empty_iff, singleton_inter_eq_empty, diff_eq,
inter_right_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hB'.subset_ground, ← diff_eq,
diff_eq_empty] at hem
obtain ⟨f, hfb, hBf⟩ := hB.exchange hB' ⟨he.2, hem.2⟩
have hi : M.Indep (insert f (B ∩ X)) := by
refine hBf.indep.subset (insert_subset_insert ?_)
simp_rw [subset_diff, and_iff_right inter_subset_left, disjoint_singleton_right,
mem_inter_iff, iff_false_intro he.1.2, and_false, not_false_iff]
exact hfb.2 (hBX.mem_of_insert_indep (Or.elim (hem.1 hfb.1) (False.elim ∘ hfb.2) id) hi).1
theorem Base.inter_basis_iff_compl_inter_basis_dual (hB : M.Base B) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat):
M.Basis (B ∩ X) X ↔ M✶.Basis ((M.E \ B) ∩ (M.E \ X)) (M.E \ X) := by
refine ⟨hB.compl_inter_basis_of_inter_basis, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hX, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hB.subset_ground] using
hB.compl_base_dual.compl_inter_basis_of_inter_basis h
theorem base_iff_dual_base_compl (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Base B ↔ M✶.Base (M.E \ B) := by
rw [dual_base_iff, diff_diff_cancel_left hB]
theorem ground_not_base (M : Matroid α) [h : RkPos M✶] : ¬M.Base M.E := by
rwa [rkPos_iff_empty_not_base, dual_base_iff, diff_empty] at h
theorem Base.ssubset_ground [h : RkPos M✶] (hB : M.Base B) : B ⊂ M.E :=
hB.subset_ground.ssubset_of_ne (by rintro rfl; exact M.ground_not_base hB)
theorem Indep.ssubset_ground [h : RkPos M✶] (hI : M.Indep I) : I ⊂ M.E := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := hI.exists_base_superset; exact hB.2.trans_ssubset hB.1.ssubset_ground
/-- A coindependent set of `M` is an independent set of the dual of `M✶`. we give it a separate
definition to enable dot notation. Which spelling is better depends on context. -/
abbrev Coindep (M : Matroid α) (I : Set α) : Prop := M✶.Indep I
theorem coindep_def : M.Coindep X ↔ M✶.Indep X := Iff.rfl
theorem Coindep.indep (hX : M.Coindep X) : M✶.Indep X :=
hX
@[simp] theorem dual_coindep_iff : M✶.Coindep X ↔ M.Indep X := by
rw [Coindep, dual_dual]
theorem Indep.coindep (hI : M.Indep I) : M✶.Coindep I :=
dual_coindep_iff.2 hI
theorem coindep_iff_exists' : M.Coindep X ↔ (∃ B, M.Base B ∧ B ⊆ M.E \ X) ∧ X ⊆ M.E := by
simp_rw [Coindep, dual_indep_iff_exists', and_comm (a := _ ⊆ _), and_congr_left_iff, subset_diff]
exact fun _ ↦ ⟨fun ⟨B, hB, hXB⟩ ↦ ⟨B, hB, hB.subset_ground, hXB.symm⟩,
fun ⟨B, hB, _, hBX⟩ ↦ ⟨B, hB, hBX.symm⟩⟩
theorem coindep_iff_exists (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Coindep X ↔ ∃ B, M.Base B ∧ B ⊆ M.E \ X := by
rw [coindep_iff_exists', and_iff_left hX]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Dual.lean | 246 | 249 | theorem coindep_iff_subset_compl_base : M.Coindep X ↔ ∃ B, M.Base B ∧ X ⊆ M.E \ B := by |
simp_rw [coindep_iff_exists', subset_diff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨⟨B, hB, _, hBX⟩, hX⟩ ↦ ⟨B, hB, hX, hBX.symm⟩,
fun ⟨B, hB, hXE, hXB⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨B, hB, hB.subset_ground, hXB.symm⟩, hXE⟩⟩
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.